. t oy Son xt hee i as JEAN ANN NiCchiv. wwii @b£50500 TOEO DO WAN 0000 IOHM/18lN ’ } ] ae. 4 i ‘ ‘ , is x i -— oh . : ite : Vs A - i ' 3 4 7 ’ ‘ 5° ’ 4 ‘Sa ‘ — ‘ ~ - * . ’ - ‘ r = é ‘ t } ; ‘ . . . % — F ‘ , Y ir 4 4 . i 5 iJ } : at ’ % i. ue bis i , i. ' ao | at Dak: hod rad ind ; ta ‘q 7 ' ’ ‘ : 2 ‘ 7 7 ‘ , > Ban . 4 " = ’ . - a > P , ~ ‘ : . é - * . . fr > . . F - 5 bd . . % . 4 . » od ad e . i . : - : ‘ es . ‘ a . d » > . - . J - . * , 42, ~_ od — ry fat PINENOCTPL ES Ore ie) EMG Y- BY HERBERT SPENCER AUTHOR oF “socIAL sTATICs,” “EDUCATION,” “sTUDY OF SOCIOLOGY,” “ESSAYS: SCIENTIFIC, POLITICAL, AND SPECULATIVE,” “FACTORS OF ORGANIC EVOLUTION,” ETC. VOL. Il NEW YORK DA PLE TON AND COMPANY 1896 jee Rese Vass See Wien) | =/ eet aaa £3 ee} ‘Candace «st Sita & = eset GEA ly, OR eR soni oe 13 yes te CNG ese A iecgs eee aes ee Be > : , J ~ , e j ~ i yr = 4 i Bk Cane 8 EGS UG? acti eh ee a | oF Pa ; et e%. 5A” St eet ae Bee ae Le Slat Kcbistay t “¢ oS Pine ame Bee — na grrye tee) hae Le ; 9 twos BIRT ke has : 7-7 7 : * >. - : 9 j a , 4 x ; . ’ :. 4 2 a) (oe : ; gl tie : Bai Cot J 2 ee, NS j ‘ sa | ' is « if f « ? é n, a ‘hh eee a eee rT inks » ?. = t s Ae 40 I 2’ = 2 i¢ a . 4 e FONG ‘ : a“ tit dees SSeretny Wes te ‘ah: oo ere. Pathe Gah sa lala dae —.- “% r CONTENTS OF VOL. IL IV.—MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. PART CUAP. FAGH I.—THE PROBLEMS CF MORPHOLOGY ae fe 3 1I.—THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS xa 10 I1I.—THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS, CON- "TINUED Sac a e ie 28 IV.—THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS xe (irs V.---THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS, CON- TINUED 99 VI.—MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN PLANTS em? bls: VII.—THE GENERAL SHAPES OF PLANTS 119 VIII.—THE SHAPES OF BRANCHES = ste sok SoU IX.—THE SHAPES OF LEAVES oe alate Sif ‘X.—THE SHAPES OF FLOWERS ts ay Sem XI.—THE SHAPES OF VEGETAL CELLS 159 XII.—CHANGES OF SHAPE OTHERWISE CAUSED 162 XIII.—MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN ANIMALS 166 XIV.—THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS 169 XV.—THE SHAPES OF VERTEBRATE SKELETONS .. 192 XVI.—THE SHAPES OF ANIMAL CELLS ... 210 RVII.—SUMMARY OF MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT 213 PART V.—PHYSLIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. I.—THE PROBLEMS OF PHYSIOLOGY... 23] 11 —DIFFERENTIATIONS BETWEEN THE OUTER AND INNER TISSUES OF PLANTS act 226 IlI.—-DIFFERENTIATIONS AMONG THE OUTER TISSUES OF PLANTS ae ae Ss ao eto IV.—DIFFERENTIATIONS AMONG THE INNER TISSUES OF PLANTS cate APP ane earns | vill CONTENTS. CHAP. V.—PHYSIOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN PLANTS ... eee VI.—DIFFERENTIATIONS BETWEEN THE OUTER AND INNER TISSUES OF ANIMALS cee mete eee VII.—-DIFFERENTIATIONS AMONG THE OUTER TISSUES OF ANIMALS eee ove oer eve V1ll.— DIFFERENTIATIONS AMONG THE INNER TISSUES OF ANIMALS S56 aes aoe eee IX.—PHYSIOLOGICAL INTEGRATION IN ANIMALS... eee X.—SUMMARY OF PHYSIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT see PART VI.—LAWS OF MULTIPIICATION I.—THE FACTORS eee cee eee eee iT eee PRIORI PRINCIPLE ... eee coe eee III.—-OBVERSE i PRIORI PRINCIPLE ... ee eee IV.—DIFFICULTIES OF INDUCTIVE VERIFICATION V.—ANTAGONISM BETWEEN GROWTH AND ASEXUAL GENESIS VI.—ANTAGONISM BETWEEN GROWTH AND SEXUAL GENESIS Vil. ANTAGONISM BETWEEN DEVELOPMENT AND GENESIS, ASEXUAL AND SEXUAL VIII.—-ANTAGONISM BETWEEN EXPENDITURE AND GENESIS ... IX.—COINCIDENCE BETWEEN HIGH NUTRITION AND GENESIS X.—-SPECIALITIES OF THESE RELATIONS XI. INTERPRETATION AND QUALIFICATION ase sis» XII.—MULTIPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RACE cola eee XIII.—HUMAN POPULATION IN THE FUTURE eee eee APPENDICES. A.——SUBSTITUTION OF AXIAL FOR FOLIAR ORGANS IN PLANTS B.—A CRITICISM ON PROF. OWENS THEORY OF THE VER- TEBRATE SKELETON Siete eee eve C.—ON CIRCULATION AND THE FORMATION OF WOOD IN PLANTS eee see ce PAGE 275 282 291 511 517 536 PAE by: MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. iy) if G ek 4 Fe by ee CHAPTER I. THE PROBLEMS OF MORPHOLOGY. § 175. Tue division of Morphology from Physiology, is one which may be tolerably-well preserved, so long as we do not carry our inquiries beyond the empirical generalizations of their respective phenomena; but it is one which becomes in great measure nominal, when the phenomena are to be rationally interpreted. It would be possible, after analyzing our Solar System, to set down certain general truths respect- ing the sizes and distances of its primary and secondary members, omitting all mention of their motions; and it would be possible to set down certain other general truths respect- ing their motions, without specifying their dimensions or positions, further than as greater or less, nearer or more re- mote. But on seeking to account for these general truths, arrived at by induction, we find ourselves obliged to con- sider simultaneously the relative sizes and places of the masses, and the relative amounts and directions of their motions. Similarly with organisms. Though we may frame sundry comprehensive propositions respecting the arrange- ments of their organs, considered as so many inert parts; and though we may establish several wide conclusions respecting the separate and combined actions of their organs, without knowing anything definite respecting the forms and positions of these organs; yet we cannot reach such a rationale of the 4 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. facts as the hypothesis of Evolution aims at, without contem: plating structures and functions in their mutual relations. Everywhere structures in great measure determine functions ; and everywhere functions are incessantly modifying structures. In Nature, the two are inseparable co-operators ; and Science can give no true interpretation of Nature, without keeping their co-operation constantly in view. An account of organic evolution, in its more special aspects, must be essentially an account of the inter-actions of structures and functions, as perpetually altered by changes of conditions. Hence, when treating apart Morphological Development and Physiological Development, all we can do is to direct our attention mainly to the one or to the other, as the case may be. In dealing with the facts of structure, we shall consider the facts of function, only in such general way as is needful to explain the facts of structure; and conversely when deal- ing with the facts of function. § 176. The problems of Morphology fall into two distinct classes, answering respectively to the two leading aspects of Evolution. In things which evolve there go on two processes —increase of mass and increase of structure. Increase of mass is primary, and in simple evolution takes place almost alone. Increase of structure is secondary, accompanying or following increase of mass with more or less regularity, wherever evolution rises above that form which small inor- ganic bodies, such as crystals, present to us. The fundamental antagonism between Dissolution and Evolution consisting in this, that while the one is an integration of motion and dis- integration of matter, the other is an integration of matter and disintegration of motion ; and this integration of matter accompanying disintegration of motion, being a necessary antecedent to the differentiation of the matter so inte- grated ; it follows that questions concerning the mode in which the parts are united into a whole, must be dealt with THE PROBLEMS OF MJRPHOLOGY. 3) before questions concerning the mode in which these parts become modified.* This is not obviously a morphological question. But an illustration or two will make it manifest, that fundamental differences may be produced between aggregates, by differences in the degrees of composition of the increments: the ultimate units of the increments being the same. ‘Thus an accu- mulation of things of a given kind may be made by add- ing one at a time. Or the things may be tied up into bundles of ten, and the tens placed together. Or the tens may be united into hundreds, anda pile of hundreds formed. Such unlikenesses in the structures of masses, are habitually seen in our mercantile transactions. Articles which the consumer re- cognizes as single, the retailer keeps wrapped up in dozens, the wholesaler sends the gross, and the manufacturer supplies in packages of a hundred gross—that is, they severally increase their stocks by units of simple, of compound, and of doubly- compound kinds. Similarly result those differences of mor- phological composition which we have first to consider. An organism consists of units. These units may be aggregated into a mass by the addition of unit to unit. Or they may be united into groups, and the groups joined together. Or these groups of groups may be so combined as to form a doubly- compound aggregate. Hence there arise respecting each organic form, the question—is its composition of the first, second, third, or fourth order ?—does it exhibit units of a singly-compounded kind only ; or are these consolidated into units of a doubly-compounded kind, or a triply-compounded kind? And if it displays double or triple composition, the * It seems needful here fo say, that allusion is made in this paragraph to a pro- position respecting the ultimate natures of Evolution and Dissolution, which is contained in an essay on The Classification of the Sciences, published in March, 1864. When the opportunity comes, I hope to make the definition there arrived at, the basis of a re-organization of the second part of First Principles : giving te that work a higher development, and a greater cohesion, than it at present pose BeSSES, 5 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. homologies of its different parts become problems. Under the disguises induced by the consolidation of primary, second- ary, and tertiary units, it has to be ascertained which answer to which, in their degrees of composition. Such questions are more intricate than they at first appear ; since, besides the obscurities caused by progressive integration, and those due to accompanying modifications of form, further obscurities result from the variable growths of units of the different orders. Just as an army may be augmented by re- cruiting in each company, without increasing the number of companies; or may be augmented by making up the full complement of companies in each regiment, while the number of regiments remains the same; or may be aug- mented by putting more regiments into each division, other things being unchanged; or may be augmented by adding to the number of its divisions without altering the components of each division ; or may be augmented by two or three of these processes at once; so, in organisms, increase of mass may be due to growth in units of the first order, or in those of the second order, or in those of still higher orders; or it may be due to simultaneous growth in units of several orders. And this last mode of integration being the general mode, puts difficulties in the way of analysis. Just as the structure of an army would be made less easy to understand, if com- panies often outgrew regiments, or regiments became larger than brigades ; so these questions of morphological composi- tion, are complicated by the indeterminate sizes of the units of each kind—relatively-simple units frequently becoming far more bulky than relatively-compound units. § 177. The morphological problems of the second class, are those having for their subject-matter the changes of shape that accompany changes of aggregation. The most general questions respecting the structure of an organism, having been answered when it is ascertained of what units it is composed as_ a whole, and in its several parts; there come the more special THE PROBLEMS OF MORPHOLOGY. 7 questions concerning its form—form in the ordinary sense. After the contrasts caused by variations in the process of integration, we have to consider the contrasts caused by variations in the process of differentiation. To speak speci- fically—the shape of the organism as a whole, irrespect- ive of its composition, has to be accounted for. Reasons have to be found for the unlikeness between its general out- lines and the general outlines of allied organisms. And there have to be answered kindred inquiries respecting the propor- tions of its component parts:—Why, among such of these as are homologous with one another, have there arisen the differences that exist? And how have there been produced the contrasts between them and the homologous parts of or- ganisms of the same type ? Very numerous are the heterogeneities of form that present themselves for interpretation under these heads. The ultimate morphological units combined in any group, may be differ- entiated individually, or collectively, or both: each of them may undergo changes of shape; or some of them may be changed and others not; or the group may be rendered mul- tiform by the greater growth of some of its units than of others. Similarly with the compound units, arising by union of these simple units. Aggregates of the second order may be made relatively complex in form, by inequalities in the rates of multiplication of their component units in diverse directions ; and among a number of such aggregates, numer- ous unlikenesses may be constituted by differences in their degrees of growth, and by differences in their modes of growth. Manifestly, at each higher stage of composition, the possible sources of divergence are multiplied still further. That facts of this order can be accounted for in detail, is not to be expected—the data are wanting. All that we may hope to do, is to ascertain their general laws. How this is to be attempted we will now consider. § 178. The task before us is to trace throughout these 3 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. phenomena the process of evolution; and to show how, as displayed in them, it conforms to those first principles which evolution in general conforms to. Two sets of factors have to be taken into account. Let us look at them. The factors cf the first class are those which tend directly to change an organic aggregate, in common with every other aggregate, from that more simple form which is not in equi- librium with incident forces, to that more complex form which is in equilibrium with them. We have to mark how, in corre- spondence with the universal law that the uniform lapses rnto the multiform, and the less multiform into the more multi- form, the parts of each organism are ever becoming further differentiated ; and we have to trace the varying relations to incident forces, by which further differentiations are entailed. We have to observe, too, how each primary modification of structure, induced by an altered distribution of forces, becomes a parent of secondary modifications—how, through the neces- sary multiplication of effects, change of form in one part brings about changes of form in other parts. And then we have also to note the metamorphoses constantly being induced by the process of segregation—by the gradual union of like parts exposed to like forces, and the gradual separation of like parts exposed to unlike forces. The fastors of the second class which we have to keep in view throughout our interpret- ations, are the formative tendencies of organisms themselves —the proclivities inherited by them from antecedent organ- isms, and which past processes of evolution have bequeathed. We have seen it to be a necessary inference from various orders — of facts (§§ 65, 84, 97,) that organisms are built up of certain highly-complex molecules, which we distinguished as physio- logical units—each kind of organism being built up of phy- siological units peculiar to itself. We found ourselves obliged to recognize in these physiological units, powers of arranging themselves into the forms of the organisms to which they be- long; analogous to the powers which the molecules of inor- 3D?) ganic substances have of aggregating into specific crystallme THE PROBLEMS OF MORPHOLOGY. 9 forms. We have consequently to regard this polarity of the physiological units, as producing, during the development of any organism, a combination of internal forces that expend themselves in working out a. structure in equilibrium with the forces to which ancestral organisms were exposed; but not in equilibrium with the forces to which the existing organ- ism is exposed, if the environment has been changed. Hence the problem in all cases, is, to ascertain the resultant of inter- nal organizing forces, tending to reproduce the ancestral form, and external modifying forces, tending to cause deviations from that form. Moreover, we have to take into account, not only the characters of immediately-preceding ancestors, but also those of their ancestors, and ancestors of all degrees of remoteness. Setting out with rudimentary types, we have to consider how, in each successive stage of evolution, the structures acquired during previous stages, have been ob- scured by further integrations and further differentiations ; or, conversely, how the lineaments of primitive organisms have all along continued to manifest themselves under the superposed modifications. § 179. Two ways of carrying on the inquiry suggest themselves. We may go through the several great groups of organisms, with the view of reaching, by comparison of parts, certain general truths respecting the homologies, the forms, and the relations of their parts; and then, having dealt with the phenomena inductively, may retrace our steps with the view of deductively interpreting the general truths reached. Or, instead of thus separating the two inves- tigations, we may carry them on hand in hand—first establishing each general truth empirically, and then pro- ceeding to the rationale of it. This last method will, I think, conduce to both brevity and clearness. Let us now thus deal with the first class of morphological problems. 34 CHAPTER II. THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. § 180. Evolution implies insensible modifications and gradual transitions, which render definition difficult—which make it impossible to separate absolutely the phases of or- ganization from one another. And this indefiniteness of distinction, to be expected a priort, we are compelled to re- cognize a posteriori, the moment we begin to group morpho- logical phenomena into general propositions. Thus, on in- quiring what is the morphological unit, whether of plants or of animals, we find that the facts refuse to be included in any rigid formula. The doctrine that all organisms are built up of cells, or that cells are the elements out of which every tissue 1s developed, is but approximately true. There are living forms of which cellular structure cannot be asserted ; and in living forms that are for the most part cellular, there are nevertheless certain portions which are not produced by the metamorphosis of cells. Supposing that clay were the only material available for building, the proposition that all houses are built of bricks, would bear about the same relation to the truth, as does the proposition that all organisms are composed of cells. This generalization respecting houses would be open to two criticisms: first, that certain houses of a primi- tive kind are formed, not out of bricks, but out of unmoulded elay ; and second, that though other houses consist mainly of bricks, vet their chimney-pots, drain-pipes, and ridge-tiles THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 11 do not result from combination or metamorphosis of bricks, but are made directly out of the original clay. And of like natures are the criticisms which must be passed on the generalization, that cells are the morphological units of or- ganisms. To continue the simile, the truth turns out to be, that the primitive clay or protoplasm out of which organisms are built, may be moulded either directly, or with various degrees of indirectness, into organic struc- tures. The physiological units which we are obliged to as- ~ sume as the components of this protoplasm, must, as we have seen, be the possessors of those complex polarities which re- sult in the structural arrangements of the organism. The assumption of such structural arrangements may go on, and, in many cases, does go on, by the shortest route ; without the passage through what we call metamorphoses. But where such structural arrangements are reached by a circuitous route, the first stage is the formation of these small aggre- gates, which, under the name of cells, are currently regarded as morphological units. The rationale of these truths appears to be furnished by the hypothesis of evolution. We set out with molecules one degree higher in complexity than those molecules of nitro- genous colloidal substance into which organic matter is resolvable ; and we regard these somewhat more complex mo- lecules as having the implied greater instability, greater sen- sitiveness to surrounding influences, and consequent greater mobility of form. Such being the primitive physiological units, organic evolution must begin with the formation of a minute aggregate of them—an aggregate showing vitality only by a higher degree of that readiness to change its form of aggregation, which colloidal matter in general displays ; and by its ability to’unite the nitrogenous molecules it meets with, into complex molecules like those of which it is com- posed. Obviously, the earliest forms must have been minute ; since, in the absence of any but diffused organic matter, no form but a minute one could find nutriment. Obviously, too, 13 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. it must have been structurelesss; since, as differentiations are producible only by the unlike actions of incident forces, there could have been no differentiations before such forces had had time to work. Hence, distinctions of parts like those required to constitute a cell, were necessarily absent at first. And we need not therefore be surprised to find, as we do find, specks of protoplasm manifesting life, and yet showing no signs of organization. A further stage of evolution is reached, when thevery imperfectly integrated molecules form- ing one of these minute aggregates, become more coherent ; at the same time as they pass into a state of heterogeneity, gradually increasing in its definiteness. That is to say, we may look for the assumption by them, of some distinctions of parts, such as we find in cells, and in what are called uni- cellular organisms. They cannot retain their primordial uni- formity ; and while in a few cases they may depart from it but slightly, they will, in the great majority of cases, acquire a very decided multiformity—there will result the compara- tively integrated and comparatively differentiated Protophyta and Protozoa. The production of minute aggregates of physiological units, being the first step ; and the passage of such minute aggregates into more consolidated and more complex forms, being the second step ; it must naturally hap- pen that all higher organic types, subsequently arising by further integrations and differentiations, will everywhere bear the impress of this earliest phase of evolution. From the law of heredity, considered as extending to the entire succes- sion of living things during the Earth’s past history, it follows, that since the formation of these small, simple organ- isms, must have preceded the formation of larger and more complex organisms, the larger and more complex organisms must inherit their essential characters. ~ We may anticipate that the multiplication and combination of these minute ageregates or cells, will be conspicuous in the early develop- mental stages of plants and animals; and that through- out all subsequent stages, cell-production and cell-differen ——————. THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 13 tiation will be dominant characteristics. The physiological units peculiar to each higher species, will, speaking generally, pass through this form of aggregation on their way towards the final arrangement they are to assume; because those primordial physiological units from which they are remotely descended, aggregated into this form. And yet, just as in other cases we found reasons for inferring (§ 131), that the traits of ancestral organization may, under certain conditions, be partially or wholly obliterated, and the ultimate structure assumed without passing through them; so, here, it is to be inferred that the process of cell-formation may, in some cases, be passed over. Thus the hypothesis of evolution prepares us for those two radical modifications of the cell- doctrine, which the facts oblige us to make. It leads us to expect that as structureless portions of protoplasm must have preceded cells in the process of general evolution ; so, in the special evolution of each higher organism, there will be an habitual production of cells out of structureless blastema. And it leads us to expect that though, generally, the physiolo- gical units composing a structureless blastema, will display their inherited proclivities by cell-development and meta- morphosis; there will nevertheless occur cases in which the tissue to be formed, is formed by direct transformation of the blastema. Interpreting the facts in this manner, we may recognize that large amount of truth which the cell-doctrine contains, without committing ourselves to the errors involved by the sweeping assertion of it. We are enabled to understand how it happens that organic structures are usually cellular in their composition, at the same time that they are not universally so. Weare shown that while we may properly continue to regard the cell as the morphological unit, we must constantly bear in mind that it is such, only in a greatly-qualified sense.* * Let me here refer those who are interested in this question, to Prof. Hux- ley’s criticism on the cell-doctrine, published in the Medico-Chirurgical Review in 1853. 14 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. § 181. These aggregates of the lowest order, each formed of physiological units united into a group that is structurely single, and cannot be divided without destruction of its individuality, may, as above implied, exist as independent organisms. The assumption to which we are committed by the hypothesis of evolution, that such so-called uni-cellular | plants, were at first the only kinds of plants, is in harmony with the fact that habitats not occupied by plants of higher orders, commonly contain these protophytes in great abund- ance and great variety. The various species of Protococcus, of Desmidiacee, and Diatomacee, supply examples of morpho- logical units living and propagating separately, under nu- merous modifications of form and structure. Figures 1, 2, and 3, represent a few of the commonest types. 22) (39) Mostly, simple plants are too small to be individually visible without the microscope. But, in some cases, these vegetal aggregates of the first order, grow to appreciable sizes. In the mycelium of some fungi, we have single cells developed into long branched filaments, or ramified tubules, that are of considerable lengths. An analogous structure characterizes certain tribes of Alga, of which Codium adherens, Fig. 4, may serve as an example. In HAydrogastrum, an- other alga, Fig. 5, we have a structure which is described aa + THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 15 simulating a perfect plant, with root, stem, bud, and fruit, all produced by the branching of a single cell. And among fungi, the genus Botrytis, Fig. 6, furnishes an illus- tration of allied kind. Here, though the size attained is much greater than that of many organisms which are mor- phologically compound, we are compelled to consider the morphological composition as simple ; since the whole can no more be separated into minor wholes, than can the branched vascular system of an animal. In these cases, we have con- siderable bulk attained, not by a number of aggregates of the first order being united into an aggregate of the second order; but by the continuous growth of an aggregate of the first order. § 182. The transition to higher forms begins in a very unobtrusive manner. Among these aggregates of the first order, an approach towards that union by which aggregates of the second order are produced, is indicated by mere juxta- position. Protophytes multiply rapidly; and their rapid multiplication sometimes causes crowding. When, instead of floating free in the water, they form a thin film on a moist surface, or are imbedded in a common matrix of mucus; the mechanical obstacles to dispersion result in a kind of feeble integration, vaguely shadowing forth a combined group. Somewhat more definite combination is shown us by such plants as Palmella botryoides. Here the members of a family of cells, arising by the spontaneous fission of a parent-cell, remain united by slender threads of that jelly-like substance which envelops their surfaces. In some Diatomacee, several individuals, instead of completely separating, hold together by their angles; and in other Diatomacee, as the Bacillaria, a variable number of units cohere so slightly, that they are continually moving in relation to one another. This formation of aggregates of the second order, faintly indicated in feeble and variable unions like the above, may be traced through phases of increasing permanence and de- 16 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. finiteness, as well as increasing extent. In the yeast-plant, Fig. 7, we have cells which may exist singly, or joined into groups of several; and which have their shapes scarcely at all modified by their connexion. Among the Desmidiacee, it happens in many cases, that the two individuals produced -by division of a parent-individual, part as soon as they are fully formed ; but in other cases, instead of parting they compose a group of two. Allied kinds show us how, by subsequent fissions of the adherent individuals and their progeny, there result longer groups; and in some species, a continuous thread of them is thus produced. oak 8, 9, 10, 11, exhibit these CO URC 2 Dom 2 FS aD several stages. Instead of linear aggregation, some of the Desmidiacee i'lustrate central aggregation; as shown in Figs. 12, 13, 14, 15. Other instances of central aggrega- tion are furnished by such protophytes as the Gonium pector- ale, Fig. 16 (a being the front view, and 6 the edge view), and the Sarcina ventriculi, Fig. 17. Further, we have that spherical mode of aggregation of which the Volvox globater furnishes a familiar instance. Thus far, however, the individuality of the secondary ag- gregate is feebly pronounced: not simply in the sense that it is small; but also in the sense that the individualities of the primary aggregates are very little subordinated. But on seeking further, we find transitions towards forms in which the compound individuality is more dominant, while the sim- ple individualities are more obscured. Obscuration of one kind, accompanies mere increase of size in the second- ary aggregate: in proportion to the greater number of the THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 1? morphological units held together in one mass, becomes their relative insignificance as individuals. We see this in the irregularly-spreading lichens that form patches on rocks; and in such creeping fungi as grow in films or lamine on decaying wood and the bark of trees. In these cases, how- ever, the integration of the component cells is of an almost mechanical kind. The aggregate of them is scarcely more individuated than a lump of inorganic matter: as witness the way in which the lichen extends its curved edges in this or that direction, as the surface favours; or the way in which the fungus grows round and imbeds the shoots and leaves that lie in its way, just as so much plastic clay might do. Though here, in the augmentation of mass, we see a progress towards the evolution of a higher type; we have as yet none of that definiteness required to constitute a compound unit, or true ageregate of the second order. Another kind of obscuration of the morphological units, is brought about by their more complete coalescence into the form of some struc- ture made by their union. This is well exemplified among tle Conferve, and their allies. In Fig. 18, there are re- presented the stages of a growing Mougeotia genuflexa, in which this merging of the simple individualities into the compound individuality, is shown in the history of a single plant ; and in Figs. 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, are represented a series of species from this group, and that of Cladophora, in which Wwe see a progressing integration. While in the lower types, the primitive spheroidal forms of the cells are scarcely 18 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. altered ; in the higher types, the cells are so fused together as to constitute cylinders divided by septa. Here, how- ever, the indefiniteness is still great: there are no specific limits to the length of any thread thus produced ; and none of that differentiation of parts required to give a decided in- dividuality to the whole. To constitute something like a true aggregate of the second order, capable of serving as a compound unit, that may be combined with others like itself into still higher ageregates, there must exist both mass and definiteness. § 183. An approach towards plants which unite these cha- racters, may be traced in such forms as Bangia ciliaris, Fig. 24. The multiplication of cells here takes place, not in a longitudinal direction only, but also in a transverse direction; and the transverse multiplication being greater towards the middle of the frond, there results a differ- ence between the middle and the two ex- tremities—a character which, in a feeble way, unites all the parts into a whole. Even | this slight individuation is, however, very ‘4 indefinitely marked; since, as shown by 4 the figures, the lateral multiplication of cells »| does not go on in a precise manner. 3) From some such type as this there appear *4 to arise, by slight differences in the modes of growth, two closely-allied groups of plants, having individualities somewhat more pro- nounced. If, while the cells multiply lon- gitudinally, their lateral multiplication goes on in one direc- tion only, there results a flat surface, as in Ulva hinza, Fig. 25; or where the lateral multiplication is less uniform in its rate, in types like Fig. 26. But where the lateral multipli- cation occurs in two directions transverse to one another, a hollow frond may be produced—sometimes irregularly jMO00000 le) eieP le) (2) (S) (2) 0 8 ! ‘O} 2) ~ THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. iv spheroidal, and sometimes irregularly tubular; as in Entero- morpha intestinalis, Fig. 27. And occasionally, as in Entero- morpha compressa, Fig. 28, thistubular frond becomes branched. Figs. 29 and 30 are magnified portions of such fronds ; show- ing the simple cellular aggregation which allies them with the preceding forms. In the common Fuci of our coasts, other and somewhat higher stages of this integration are displayed. We have fronds preserving something like constant breadths; and dividing dichotomously with approximate regularity. Though the sub-divisions so produced, are not to be regarded at all as separate fronds, but only as extensions of one frond, they foreshadow a higher degree of composition ; and by the com- paratively methodic way in which they are united, give to the aggregate a more definite, as well as a more complex, in- dividuality. Many of the higher lichens exhibit an analogous advance. While in the lowest lichens, the ditferent parts of the thallus are held together only by being all attached to the supporting surface, in the higher lichens the thallus is so far integrated that it can support itself by attachment to such surface at one point only. And then, in still more developed kinds, we find the thallus assuming a dichotomously-branched form, and so gaining a more specific character as well as greater size. 20 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. Where, as in types like these, the morphological units show an inherent tendency to arrange themselves in a man- ner that is so far constant as to give characteristic propor- tions, we may say that there is a recognizable compound in- dividuality. Considering the ThaJlogens that grow in this way, apart from their kinships, and wholly with reference to their morphological composition, we might not inaptly de- scribe them as pseudo-foliar. § 184. Another mode in which aggregation is so carried on as to produce a compound individuality of considerable definiteness, is variously displayed among other families of Alge. When the cells, instead of multiplying longitsudin- ally alone, and instead of all multiplying laterally as well as longitudinally, multiply laterally only at particular places ; they produce a branched structure. | Indications of this mode of aggregation occur among the Conferve and simple plants akin to them, as shown in Figs. 22, 23. Though, in some of the more developed A/ge which exhibit the ramified arrangement in a higher degree, the component cells are, like those of the lower Alga, united to- gether end to end, in such way as but little to obscure their separate forms, as in Cladophora Hutchinsie, Fig. 31; they nevertheless evince greater subordination to the whole of which they are parts, by arranging themselves more method- THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. | ieally. Still further pronounced becomes the compound individuality, when, while the component cells of the branches unite completely into jointed cylinders, the com- ponent cells of the stem begin to multiply laterally, so as to form an axis distinguished by its relative thickness and com- plexity. Such types of structures are indicated by Figs. 32, 33—figures representing small portions of plants which are quite tree-like in their entire outlines. On examining Figs. 34, 35, 36, which show the structures of the stems in these. types, it will be seen, too, that the component cells in becoming more coherent, have undergone changes of form which obscure their individualities more than before: not only are they much elongated, but they are so compressed as to be prismatic rather than cylindrical. This structure, be- sides displaying integration of the morphological units car- ried on in two directions instead of one; and besides displaying this higher integration in the greater merging of the indi- vidualities of the morphological units in the general individu- ality; also displays it in the more pronounced subordination of the branches and branchlets to the main stem. This differ- entiation and consolidation of the stem, brings all the second- ary growths into more marked dependence; and so renders the individuality of the aggregate more decided. We might not inappropriately call this type of structure pseud-axial. It simulates that of the higher plants in cer- tain leading characters. We see in it a primary axis along which development may continue indefinitely, and from which there bud out, laterally, secondary axes of like na- ture, bearing like tertiary axes; and this is the mode of growth with which Phenogams make us familiar. But the resemblance goes no further ; for these pseud-axes are devoid of those lateral appendages—those leaves or foliar organs— which true axes bear, and the bearing of which ordinarily constitutes them true axes. § 185. Some of the larger Alge supply examples of an 22 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVEL DPMENT. integration still more advanced: not simply inasmuch as they unite much greater numbers of morphological units into continuous masses; but also inasmuch as they com- bine the pseudo-fclar structure with the pseud-axial siruc- ture. Our own shores furnish an instance of this in the common Laminaria; and certain gigantic Fuct of the Antartic seas, supply yet better instances. In some of these, the germ develops a very long slender stem, which eventually expands into a large bladder-like or cylindrical air-vessel; and from the surface of this there grow out numerous leaf-shaped expansions. Another kind, Lessonia fuscescens, Fig. 37, shows us a massive stem growing up through water many feet deep—a stem which, bifurcating as it approaches the surface, flat- am Ay tens out the ends of its subdivisions into fronds 7% like ribands. These, however, are not true foliar appendages, since they are merely ex- panded continuations of the stem. The whole plant, great as is its size, and made up though it seems to be of many groups of mor- phological units, united into a compound group by their marked subordination to a connecting mass, is nevertheless a single thallus. The aggregate is still an aggregate - of the second order. But ameng certain of the highest Algw, we do find some- thing more than this union of the pseud-axial with the pseudo-foliar structure. In addition to pseud-axes of comparative complexity; and in addition to pseudo-folia that are like leaves, not- only in their general shapes, Dut in having mid-ribs and even veins; there are the be- ginnings of a higher stage of integration. Figs. 38, 39, and 40, show some of the steps. In Rhodymenia palmata, Fig. 38, the parent-frond is comparatively irregular in shape, and without a mid-rib; and along with this very imperfect integration, we see that the secondary fronds growing from THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 23 ne Ane Ar ME L, c — the edges are distributed very much at random, and are by no means specific in their shapes. A considerable advance is displayed by Phyllephora rubens, Fig. 59. Here the frond, primary, secondary, or tertiary, betrays some approach to- wards regularity in both form and size; by which, as also by its partially-developed mid-rib, there is established a more marked individuality ; and at the same time, the growth of the secondary fronds no longer occurs anywhere on the edge, in the same plane as the parent frond, but from the surface at specific places. Delesseria sanguinea, Fig. 40, illustrates a much more definite arrangement of the same kind. The fronds of this plant, quite regularly shaped, have their parts decidedly subordinated to the whole; and from their mid- ribs grow other fronds, which are just like them. Lach of these fronds is an organized gruup of those morphological units which we distinguish as aggregates of the first order. And in this case, two or more such ageregates of the second order, well individuated by their forms and structures, are anited together; and the plant composed of them is thus rendered, in so far, an aggregate of the third order. Just noting that in certain of the most-developed Alga, as 24 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. the Sargassum, or common gulf-weed, this tertiary degree of composition is far more completely displayed, so as to pro- duce among Thallogens a type of structure closely simulating that of the higher plants, let us now pass to the considera- tion of these higher plants. § 186. Having the surface of the soil for a support and the air for a medium, terrestrial plants are mechanically cireum- stanced in a manner widely different from that in which aquatic plants are circumstanced. Instead of being buoyed up by a surrounding fluid of specific gravity equal to their own, they have to erect themselves into a rare fluid which yields no appreciable support. Further, they are dis- _ similarly conditioned in having two sources of nutriment in place of one. Unhke the Alye, which derive all the mate- rials for their tissues from the water bathing their entire surfaces, and use their roots only for attachment ; most of the plants which cover the Earth’s surface, absorb part of their food through their imbedded roots and part through their exposed leaves, These two marked unlikenesses in the rela- tions to surrounding conditions, profoundly affect the respec- tive modes of growth. We must duly bear them in mind while studying the further advance of composition. The class of plants to which we now turn—that of Acrogens —is nearly related by its lower members to the classes above dealt with : so much so, that some of the inferior liverworts are quite licheniform, and are often mistaken for lichens. Passing over these, let us recommence our analysis with such members of the class, as repeat those indications of progress towards a higher composition, which we have just observed among the more-developed Alge. The Jungermanniacce furnish us with a series of types, clearly indicating the transi- tion from an aggregate of the second order to an aggregate of the third order. Figs. 41, and 42, indicate the structure among the lowest of this group. Here there is but an incom- plete development of the second order of aggregate. The THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 25 frond grows as irregularly as the thallus of a lichen: it is in- definite in size and outline, spreading hither or thither as the conditions favour. Moreover, it lacks the differentiations re- =<, quired to subordinate its parts to the whole: it is uniformly cellular, having neither mid-rib nor veins; and it puts out rootlets indifferently from all parts of its under-surface. In Big 45, Jungermannia epiphylla, we have an advance on this type. There is here, as shown in the transverse section, Fig. 44, a thickening of the frond along its central portion, pro- ducing something like an approach towards a mid-rib; and from this the rootlets are chiefly given off. The outline, too, is much less irregular; whence results greater distinctness of the individuality. A further step is displayed in Junger- mannia furcata, Fig. 45. The frond of this plant, compara- tively well integrated by the distribution of its substance around a decided mid-rib, and by its comparatively-definite outlines, produces secondary fronds—there is what is called proliferous growth ; and, occasionally, as shown in Fig. 46, representing an enlarged portion, the growth is doubly-pro- liferous. In these cases, however, the tertiary aggregate, so far as it is formed, is but very feebly integrated; and its in- tegration is but temporary. [or not only do these younger fronds that bud out from the mid-ribs of older fronds, develop rootlets of their own ; but as soon as they are well grown and adequately rooted, they dissolve their connexions with the perent-fronds, and become quite independent. From these transitional forms we pass, in the higher Jungerman- niacew, to forms composed of many fronds that are perman- ently united by a continuous stem. A more-developed ag- ays ov 26 MCRPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. gregate of the third order is thus produced. But though, along with increased definiteness in the secondary aggregates, there is here an integration of them so extensive and so re- gular, that they are visibly subordinated to the whole they form; yet the subordination is really very incomplete. In some instances, as in J. complanata, Fig. 47, the leaflets de- velop roots from their under surfaces, Just as the primitive frond does; and in the majority of the group, as in Jd. capitata, Fig. 48, roots are given off all along the connecting stem, at the spots where the leaflets or frondlets join it: the result being, that though the connected frondlets form a physical whole, they do not form, in any decided manner, a physiological whole; since successive portions of the united series, carry on their functions independently of the rest. Finally, the most developed members of the group, present us with tertiary aggregates ‘that are physio- logically as well as physically integrated. Not lying prone ike the kinds thus far described, but growing erect, the stem and attached leaflets become dependent upon a single root or vroup of roots; and being so prevented from carrying on their functions separately, are made members of a compound indi- vidual—there arises a definitely-established aggregate of the third degree of composition. The facts as arranged in the above order, are suggestive. Minute aggregates, or cells, the grouping of which we traced in § 182, showed us analogous phases of indefinite union, which appeared to lead the way towards definite union. We THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. a see here among compound aggregates, as we saw there among simple aggregates, the establishment of a specific form, and a size that falls within moderate limits of varia- tion. This passage from less definite extension to more de- finite extension, seems in the one case, as the other, to be ac- companied by the result, that growth exceeding a certain rate, ends in the formation of a new aggregate, rather than an enlargement of the old. And on the higher stage, as oa the lower, this process, irregularly carried out in the simpler types, produces in them unions that are but temporary ; while in. the more-developed types, it proceeds in a systematic way, and ends in the production of a permanent aggregate that is doubly compound. Must we then conclude, that as cells, or morphological units, are integrated into a unit of a higher order, which we eall a thallus or frond; so, by the integration of fronds, there is evolved a structure such as the above-delineated species possess ? Whether this is the interpretation to be given of these plants, we shall best see when considering whether it is the interpretation to be given of plants that rank above them. Thus far we have dealt only with the Cryptogamia. We have now to deal with the Phanerogamia or Phanogamia. CUEAPE Dalal. THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS, CONTINUED. § 187. THat advanced composition arrived at in the Acrogens, is carried still further in the Endogens and Exo- gens. In these most-elevated vegetal forms, aggregation of the third order is always distinctly displayed; and aggre- gates of the fourth, fifth, sixth, &c., orders are very common. Our inquiry into the morphology of these flowering plants, may be advantageously commenced by studying the development of simple leaves into compound leaves. It is easy to trace the transition, as well as the conditions under which it occurs; and tracing it will prepare us for under- standing how, and when, metamorphoses still greater in de- gree, take place. § 188. If we examine a branch of the common bramble, when in flower or afterwards, we shall not unfrequently find a simple or undivided leaf, at the insertion of one of the lateral flower-bearing axes, composing the terminal cluster of flowers. Sometimes this leaf is partially lobed ; sometimes cleft into three small leaflets. Lower down on the shoot, if it be a lateral one, occur larger leaves, composed of three leaflets; and in some of these, two of the leaflets may be lobed more or less deeply. On the main stem, the leaves, usually still larger, will be found to have five leaflets. Sup- * THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 29 posing the plant to be a well-grown one, it will furnish all gradations between the simple, very small leaf, and the large composite leaf, containing sometimes even seven fenficie Figs. 50 to 64, represent leading stages of the transition. What determines this transition ? Observation shows that the quintuple leaves occur where the materials for growth are supplied in greatest abundance; that the leaves become lesa x 80 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. and less compound, in proportion to their remoteness from the main currents of sap; and that where an entire absence of divisions or lobes is observed, it is on leaves within the flower-bunch: at the place, that is, where -the forces that cause growth are nearly equilibrated by the forces that oppose growth ; and where, as a consequence, gamogenesis is about to set in (§ 78). Additional evidence that the degree of nutrition determines the degree of composition of the leaf, is furnished by the relative sizes of the leaves. Not only, on the average, is the quintuple leaf much larger in its total area than the triple leaf; but the component leaflets of the one, are usually much larger than those of the other. The like con- trasts are still more marked between triple leaves and simple leaves. This connexion of decreasing size with decreasing composition, 1s conspicuous in the series of figures: the differ- ences shown, being not nearly so great as may bs frequently observed. Confirmation may be drawn from the fact, that when the leading shoot is broken or arrested in its growth, the shoots it gives off (provided they are given off after the injury), and into which its checked currents of sap are thrown, produce leaves of five leaflets, where ordinarily leaves of three leaflets occur. Of course incidental circumstances, as varia- tions in the amounts of sunshine, or of rain, or of matter sup- plied to the roots, are ever producing changes in the state of the plant as a whole; and by thus affecting the nutrition of its leaf-buds at the times of their formation, cause irregularities in the relations of size and composition above described. Put taking these causes into account, it is abundantly manifest that a leaf-bud of the bramble, will develop into a simple leaf or into a leaf compounded in different degrees, according to the quantity of assimilable matter brought to it at the time when the rudiments of its structure are being fixed. And on studying the habits of other plants—on observing how annuals that have compound leaves, usually bear simple leaves at the outset, when the assimilating surface is but small; and how, when compound-leaved plants in full growth THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. ol pear simple leaves in the midst of compound ones, the rela- tive smallness of such simple leaves shows that the buds from which they arose were ill-supplied with sap; it will cease to be doubted that a foliar organ may be metamorphosed into a group of foliar organs, if furnished, at the right time, with a quantity of matter greater than can be readily organized round a single centre of growth. An examination of the transitions through which a compound leaf passes into a doubly-compound leaf, as seen in the various intermediate forms of leaflets in Fig. 65, will further enforce this conclusion. Ilere we may advantageously note, too, how in such cases, te leaf-stalk undergoes concomitant changes of structure. In the bramble-leaves above described, it becomes compound simultaneously with the leaf—the veins become mid-ribs while the mid-ribs become petioles. Moreover, the secondary stalks, and still more the main stalks, bear thorns similar in their shapes, and approaching in their sizes, to those on the stem; 32 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. besides simulating the stem in colour and texture. In the petioles of large ecmpound leaves, like those of the com- mon Heraclewm, we still more distinctly see both internal and external approximations in character to axes. Nor are there wanting plants whose large, though simple, leaves, are held out far from the stems, by foot-stalks that are, near the ends, sometimes so like axes, that the transverse sections of the two are indistinguishable; as instance the Calla Ethiopica. One other fact respecting the modifications which leaves undergo, should be set down. Not only may leaf-stalks as-. sume to a great degree the characters of stems, when they have to discharge the functions of stems, by supporting many leaves or very large leaves; but they may assume the cha- racters of leaves, when they have to undertake the functions ef leaves. The Australian Acacias furnish a remarkable illustration of this. Acacias elsewhere found, bear pinnate leaves ; but the majority of those found in Australia, bear what appear to be simple leaves. It turns out, however, that these are merely leaf-stalks flattened out into foliar shapes: the lamin of the leaves being undeveloped. And the proof is, that in young plants, showing their kinships by their em- bryonic characters, these leaf-liKe petioles bear true leaflets at their ends. A metamorphosis of like kind occurs in Ozalis bupleurifolia, Fig. 66. The fact most deserving of notice, i however, is, that these leaf- stalks, in usurping the gene- ral aspects and functions of leaves, have also usurped their structures: though their ve- nation is not like that of the leaves they replace, yet they have veins, and in some cases mid-ribs. Reduced to their most general expression, the truths above shadowed forth are these :—That group of morphologi- cal units, or cells, which we see integrated into the compound unit cailed a leaf, has, in each higher plant, a typical form; due to the special arrangement of these cells around a mid-rib and 44 THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 33 veins. Ifthe multiplication of morphological units, at the time when the leaf-bud is taking on its main outlines, exceeds a certain limit, these units begin to arrange themselves round secondary centres, or lines of growth, in such ways as to re- peat, in part or wholly, the typical form: the larger veins become transformed into imperfect mid-ribs of partially inde- pendent leaves; or into complete mid-ribs of quite separate leaves. And as there goes on this transition from a single ageregate of cells to a group of such aggregates, there simul- taneously arises, by similarly-insensible steps, a distinct structure which supports the several aggregates thus pro- duced, and unites them into a compound aggregate. These phenomena should be carefully studied; since they give us a key to more involved phenomena. § 189. Thus far we have dealt with leaves ordinarily so called: briefly indicating the homologies between the parts of the simple and the compound. Let us now turn to the homo- logies among foliar organs in general. These have been made familiar to readers of natura! history, by popularized outlines of “The Metamorphosis of Plants”’—a title, by the way, which is far too extensive ; since the phenomena treated of under it, form but a small portion of those it properly in- cludes. Passing over certain vague anticipations that have heen quoted from ancient writers, and noting only that some clearer recognitions were reached by Joachim Jung, a Ham- burg professor, .n the middle of the 17th century ; we come to the Theorta Generationis, which Wolff published in 1759, and in which he gives a definite form to the conceptions that have since become current. Specifying the views of Wolff, Dr Masters writes,—‘“ After speaking of the homologous nature of the leaves, the sepals and petals, an homology consequent on their similarity of structure and identity of origin, he goes on to state that the ‘pericarp is manifestly composed of several leaves, as in the calyx, with this differ- 34 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. ence only, that the leaves which are merely placed in close contact in the calyx, are here united together ;’ a view whicn he corroborates by referring to the manner in which many capsules open and separate ‘into their leaves.’ The seeds, too, he looks upon as consisting of leaves in close combination. His reasons for considering the petals and stamens as homologous with leaves, are based upon the same facts as those which led Linnzus, and, many years afterwards, Goethe, to the same conclusion. ‘In a word,’ says Wolff, ‘we see nothing in the whole plant, whose parts at first sight differ so remark- ably from each other, but leaves and-stem, to which latter the root is referrible.’’’ It appears that Wolff, too, enunci- ated the now-accepted interpretation of compound fruits: basing it on the same evidence as that since assigned. In the essay of Goethe, published thirty years after, these rela- tions among the parts of flowering plants were traced out in greater detail, but not in so radical a way; for Goethe did not, as did Wolff, verify his hypothesis by dissecting buds in their early stages of development. Goethe appears to have arrived at his conclusions independently. But that they were original with him, and that he gave a more variously-illus- trated exposition of them than had been given by Wolff, does not entitle him to anything beyond a secondary place, among those who have established this important generaliza- tion. Were it not that these pages may be read by some to whom Biology, in all its divisions, is a new subject of study, it would be needless to name the evidence on which this now- familiar generalization rests. For the information of such it will suffice to sav, that the fundamental kinship existing among all the foliar organs of a flowering plant, is shown by the transitional forms which may be traced between them, and by the occasional assumption of one another’s forms. “Floral leaves, or bracts, are frequently only to be distin- guished from ordinary leaves by their position at the base of the flower; at cther times the bracts gradually assume more THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPUSITION OF PLANTS. 3o und more of the appearance of the sepals.” The sepals, or divisions of the calyx, are not unlike undeveloped leaves: sometimes assuming quite the structures of leaves. In other cases, they acquire partially or wholly the colours of the petals—as, indeed, the bracts and uppermost stem-leaves occasionally do. Similarly, the petals show their alliances to the fohar organs lower down on the axis, and to those higher up on the axis: on the one hand, they may develop into or- dinary leaves that are green and veined; and, on the other hand, as so commonly seen in double flowers, they may bear anthers on their edges. All varieties of gradation into neighbouring foliar organs, may be witnessed in stamens. Flattened and tinted in various degrees, they pass insensibly into petals, and through them prove their homology with leaves; into which, indeed, they are transformed in flowers that become wholly foliaceous. The style, too, is occasionally changed into petals or into green leaflets; and even the ovules are now and then seen to take on leaf-like forms. Thus we have clear evidence that in Phznogams, all the ap- pendages of the axis are homologues: they are all modified leaves. Wolff established, and Goethe further illustrated, another general law of structure in flowering plants. Each leaf commonly contains in its axil, a bud, similar in structure to the terminal bud ‘This axillary bud may remain unde- veloped; or it may develop into a lateral shoot like the main shoot; or it may develop into a flower. If a shoot bearing lateral flowers be examined, it will be found that the internode, or space which separates each leaf with its axillary flower from the leaf and axillary flower above it, becomes gradually less towards the upper end of the shoot. In some plants, as in the fox-glove, the internodes constitute a regularly-diminishing series. In other plants, the series they form suddenly begins to diminish so rapidly, as to bring the flowers into a short spike—instance the common orchis. And again, by a still more sudden dwarfing of the internodes, the 3 36 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. flowers are brought into a cluster ; as they are in the cows- lip. On contemplating a clover-flower, in which this clustering nas been carried so far as to produce a com- pact head; and on considering what must happen if, by a further arrest of axial development, the foot-stalks of the florets disappear; it will be seen that there must result a crowd of flowers, seated close together on the end of the axis. And if, at the same time, the internodes of the upper stem- leaves also remain undeveloped, these stem-leaves will be grouped into a common calyx or involucre: we shall have a composite flower, such as the thistle. Hence, to modifications in the developments of foliar organs, have to be added modi- fications in the developments of axial organs. Comparisons disclose the gradations through which axes, like their append- ages, pass into all varieties of size, proportion, and structure. And we learn that the occurrence of these two kinds of metamorphosis, in all conceivable degrees and combinations, furnishes us with a proximate interpretation of morpho- logical composition in Pheenogams. I say a proximate interpretation, because there remain to be solved certain deeper problems; one of which at once presents itself to be dealt with under the present head. Leaves, petals, stamens, &c., being shown to be homologous foliar organs; and the part to which they are attached, proving to be an indefinitely-extended axis of growth, or axial organ; we are met by the questions,—What is a foliar organ ? and What is an axial organ ? The morphological com- position of a Pheenogam is undetermined, so long as we can- not say to what lower structures leaves and shoots are homo- logous; and how this integration of them originates. To these questions let us now address ourselves. § 190-1. Already, in § 78, reference has been made +o the occasional development of foliar organs into axial organs: the special case there described, being that of a fox-glove, in which some of the sepals were replaced by flower-buds y THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 37—45 The observation of these and some analogous monstrosities, raising the suspicion that the distinction between foliar organs and axial organs is not absolute, led me to examine into the matter; and the result has been the deepening os this suspicion into a conviction. Part of the evidence is given in Appendix A Some time after having reached this conviction, 1 found on looking into the literature of the subject, that analogous ir- regularities have suggested to other observers, beliefs similarly at viriance with the current morphological creed. Diffi- culties in satisfactorily defining these two elements, have served to shake this creed in some minds. To others, the strange leaf-like developments which axes undergo in eertain plants, have afforded reasons for doubting the constancy of this distinction which vegetal morphologists usually draw. And those not otherwise rendered sceptical, have been made to hesitate by such cases as that of the Nepaul-barley ; in which the glume, a foliar organ, becomes developed into an axis, and bears flowers. In his essay— “Vegetable Morphology: its History and Present Condi- tion,’ * whence I have already quoted, Dr Masters indicates sundry of the grounds for thinking, that there is no impassable demarcation between leaf and stem. Among other difficult- ies which meet us if we assume that the distinction is abso- lute, he asks—‘‘ What shall we say to cases such as those afforded by the leaves of Guarea and T'richilia, where the leaves after a time assume the condition of branches and de- velop young leaflets from their free extremities, a process less perfectly seen in some of the pinnate-leaved kinds of Berbevis or Mahonia, to be found iii almost every shrubbery ?” A class of facts on which it will be desirable for us nere to dwell a moment, before proceeding to deal with the matter deductively, is presented by the Cactacee. In this remark- able group of plants, deviating in such varied ways from the ordinary phzenogamic type, we find many highly instructive * See British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review for January, 1862 44 - MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. modifications of form and structure. By contemplating the changes here displayed within the limits of a single order, we shall greatly widen our conception of the possibilities of metamorphosis in the vegetal kingdom, taken as a whole. Two different, but similarly-significant, truths are illustrated. First, we are shown how, of these two components of a flowering plant, commonly regarded as primordially distin- guished, one may assume, throughout numerous species, the functions, and to a great degree the appearance, of the other, Second, we are shown how, in the same individual, there may occur a re-metamorphosis—the usurped function and appearance being maintained in one part of the plant, while in another part, there is a return to the ordinary appearance and function. We will consider these two truths separ- ately. Some of the Huphorbiacee, which simulate Cactuses, show us the stages through which such abnormal structures are arrived at. In Euphorbia splendens, the lateral axes are considerably swollen at their distal ends, so as often to be club-shaped: still, hewever, being covered with bark of the ordinary colour, and still bearing leaves. But in kindred plants, as Huphorbia neriifolia, this swelling of the lateral axes is carried to a far greater extent; and, at the same time, a green colour and a fleshy consistence have been acquired: the typical relations nevertheless being still shown, by the few leaves that grow out of these soft and swollen axes. In the Cactacee, which are thus resembled by plants not otherwise allied to them, we have indications of a parallel transformation. Some kinds, not commonly brought to England, bear leaves; but in the species most familiar to us, the leaves are undeveloped and the axes assume their functions. Passing over the many varieties of form and combination which these green succulent growths display, we have to note that in some genera, as in Phy/locactus, they become flattened out into foliaceous shapes, having mid-ribs and something approaching to veins. ‘So that here, and in the genus Epiphyllum, which has this character still more THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 48 marked, the plant appears to be composed of fleshy ie growing one upon another. And then, in RAipsalis, the same parts are so leaf-like that an uncritical observer would regard them as leaves. These which are axial organs in their homologies, have become foliar organs. in their analogies. When, instead of comparing these strangely-modified axes in different genera of Cactuses, we compare them in the same individual, we meet with transform- ations no less striking. Where a tree-like form is pro- duced by the growth of these foliaceous shoots, one on another and where, as a consequence, the first-formed of them become the main stem that acts as support to secondary and tertiary stems; they lose their green, succulent character, acquire bark, and become woody—in resuming the functions of axes they resume the structures of axes, from which they had de- viated. In Fig. 71 are shown some of the leaf-like axes of Rhipsalis rhombea in their young state; while Fig. 72 repre- sents the oldest portion of the same plant, in which the foli- aceous characters are quite obliterated, and there has re- sulted an ordinary stem-struc- ture. One further ¢ fact is to be noted. At the same time that their leaf-like appearances are lost, the axes also lose their separate individualities. As they become stem-like, they also become integrated; and they do this so effectually, that their original points of junction, at first so strongly marked, are effaced, and a consolidated trunk is produced. Joined with the facts previously specified, these facts help us to conceive how, in the evolution of flowering plants in general, the morphological components that were once distinct, may become extremely disguised. We may ration- ally expect that during so long a course of modification, much greater changes of form, and much more decided fusions 46 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELUIMENT. of parts, have taken place. Seeing how, in an individual plant, the singleleaves pass into compound leaves, by the devel- opment of their veins into mid-ribs while their mid-ribs begin to simulate axes; and seeing that leaves ordinarily exhibit- ing definitely-limited developments, occasionally produce other leaves from their edges; we are led to suspect the pos- sibility of still greater changes in foliar organs. When, fur-* ‘her, we find that within the limits of one natural order, petioles usurp the functions and appearances of leaves, at the same time that in other orders, as in Ruscus, lateral axes so completely simulate leaves that their axial nature would never have been supposed, did they not bear flowers on their mid- ribs or edges; and when, among Cactuses, we perceive that such metamorphoses and re-metamorphoses take place with ereat facility ; our suspicion that the morphological elements of Phenogams admit of profound transformations, is deepened. And then, on discovering how frequent are the monstrosities that do not seem satisfactorily explicable without admitting the development of foliar organs into axial organs ; we become ready to entertain the hypothesis, that during the evolution of the phzenogamic type, the distinction between leaves and axes has arisen by degrees. With our pre-conceptions loosened by such facts, and carrying with us the general idea which such facts suggest, let us now consider in what way the typical structure of a flowering plant may be interpreted. § 192. To proceed methedically, we must seek a clue to the structures of Endogens and Exogens, in the structures cf those inferior plants that approach to them—Acrogens. The various divisions of this class present, along with sundry characters which ally them with Thallogens, other charac- ters by which the phenogamic structure is shadowed forth. While some of the inferior Hepatice or Liverworts, severally consist of little more than a thallus-like frond; among the higher members of this group, and still more among the THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 47 Mosses and Ferns, we find a distinctly marked stem.* Some Acrugens have foliar expansions that are indefinite in their forms; and some have quite definitely-shaped leaves. Roots are possessed by all the more developed genera of the class ; but there are other genera, as Sphagnum, which have no roots. Here the fronds are thallus-like, in being formed of only a single layer of cells; and there a double layer gives them a more leaf-like character—a difference exhibited between closely-allied genera of one order, the Mosses. Equally varied are the developments of the foliar-organs in their detailed structures: now being without mid-ribs or veins ; now having mid-ribs but no veins ; now having both mid-ribs and veins. Where stem and leaves exist, their imperfect differentiation is shown by the fact, that in many cases the stem is covered by an epidermis containing stomata. Nor must we omit the similarly-significant circumstance, that whereas in the lower Acrogens, the reproductive elements are immersed here and there in the thallus-like frond ; they are, in the higher orders, seated in well-specialized and quite distinct fructifying organs, having analogies with the flowers of Phanogams. Thus, many facts imply that if the pheenogamic type is to be analyzed at all, we must look among the Acrogens for its mor- phological components, and the manner of their integration. Already we have seen among the lower Cryptogamia, how * Schleiden, who chooses to regard as an axis, that which Mr Berkeley, with more obvious truth, calls a mid-rib, says :—‘ The flat stem of the Liverworts pre- sents many varieties, consisting frequently of one simple layer of thin-walled cells, or it exhibits in its axis the elemeats oF the ordinary stem.” This passage exemplifies the wholly gratuitous hypotheses which men will sometimes espouse, to escape hypotheses they dislike. Schleiden, with the positiveness characteristic of him, asserts the primordial distinctiun between axial organs and foliar organs. In the higher Acrogens, he sees an undeniable stem. In the lower Acrogens, clearly allied to them by their fructification, there is no structure having the remotest resemblance to a stem. But to save his hypothesis, Schleiden calls that ‘‘a flat stem,” which is very obviously a structure in which stem and leaf are not differ- entiated. He is the more to be blamed for this unphilosophical assumption, since he is merciless in his strictures on the unphilosophical assumptions of othe: »otanists. 3A 48 MORFHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT, as they become integrated and definitely limited, aggregaten acquire the habit of budding cat other aggregates, on reach- ing certain stages of growth. Cells produce other cells endogenously or exogenously ; and fronds give origin to other fronds from their edges or surfaces. We have seen, too, that the new aggregates so produced, whether of the first order or the second order, may either separate or remain zonnected. Fissiparously-multiplying cells in some cases fly asunder, while in other cases they unite into threads or lamine or masses; and fronds originating proliferousty from other fronds, sometimes when mature disconnect themselves from their parents, and sometimes continue attached to them. Whether they do or do not part, is clearly determined by their nutrition. If the conditions are such that they can severally thrive better by separating after a certain develop- ment is reached, it will become their habit then to separate ; since natural selection will favour the propagation of those which separate most nearly at that time. If, conversely, it profits the species for the cells or fronds to continue longer attached, which it can only do if their growth and subse- quent powers of multiplication are thereby increased ;-it must happen, through the continual survival of the fittest, that longer attachment will become an established characteristic ; and by persistence in this process, permanent attachment will result, when permanent attachment is advantageous. That disunion is really a consequence of relative innu- trition, and union a consequence of relative nutrition, is clear, a posteriori. On the one hand, the separation of the new individuals, whether in germs or as developed aggregates, is a decaying away of the connecting tissue ; and this implies that the connecting tissue has ceased to perform its .function as a channel of nutriment. On the other hand, where, as we see among Phnogams, there is about to take place a separation of new individuals in the shape of germs, at the point where the nutrition is the lowest, a sudden increase of nutrition will cause the impend- THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 49 tug separation to be arrested ; and the fructifying elements will revert towards the ordinary form, and develop in con- nexion with the parent. Turning to the Acrogens, we tind among them, many indications of this transition from dis- continuous development to continuous development.- Thus the Liverworts give origin to new plants by cells which they throw off from their surfaces; as, indeed, we have seen that much higher plants do. “According to Bischoff,” says Schleiden, ‘both the cells of the stem (Jungermannia biden- tata) and those of the leaves (J. easecta) separate themselves as propagative cells from the plant, and isolated cells shoot out and develop while still connected with the parent plant into small cellular bodies (J. violacea), which separate from the plant, and grow into new plants, as in Miiwm androgynum among the Mosses.’” Now in the way above explained, these propagative cells and proliferous buds, may continue de- veloping in connexicn with the parent, to various degrees before separating ; or the buds which are about to become fructifying organs, may similarly, under increased nutrition, develop into young fronds. As Sir W. Hooker says of the male fructification in Jungermannia furcata,—* It has the ap- pearance of being a young shoot or innovation (for in colour and texture I can perceive no difference) rolled up into a spherical figure.” On finding in this same plant, that some- times the proliferously-produced frond, buds out from itself another frond before separating from the parent, as shown in Fig. 46; it becomes clear that this long-continued connexion, may readily pass into permanent connexion. And whep we see how, even among Phzenogams, buds may either detach themselves as bulbils, or remain attached and become shoots ; we can scarcely doubt that among inferior plants, less de- finite in their modes of organization, such transitions must continually occur. Let us suppose, then, that Fig. 73 is the frond of some primitive Acrogen, similar in general characters to Junger- nanmea epiphylla, Fig.43; bearing, like it, the fructifying buds 5U MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. on its upper surface, and having a slightly- d 73 marked mid-rib and rootlets. And sup- pose that, as shown, a secondary frond is \ proliferously produced from the mid-rik, and continues attached to it. Evidently, the ordinary discontinuous development, can thus become a continuous development, cnly on condition that there is an adequate supply, to the secondary frond, of such materials as are furnished by the rootlets: the remaining materials being obtainable by itself from the air. Hence, that portion of the mid-rib lying between the secondary frond and the chief rootlets, having its function increased, will increase in bulk. An additional consequence will be, a creater concentration of the rootlets— there will be extra growth of those which are most serviceably placed. Observe, next, that the structure so arising, is likely to be maintained. Such a variation implying, as it does, circumstances especially favour- able to the growth of the plant, will give to the plant extra chances of leaving de- scendants; since the area of frond sup- ported by a given area of the soil, being greater than in other individuals, there may be a greater production of spores. And then, among the more numerous descendants thus secured by it, the varia- tion will give advantages to those in which it recurs. Such a mode of growth having, in this manner, become established, let us ask what is next likely to resuit. If it becomes the habit of the primary frond to bear a secondary frond from its mid-rib, this secondary frond, composed of physiological units of the same kind, will inherit the habit ; and supposng THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 5] that the supply of mineral matters obtained by the rootlets suffices for the full development of the secondary frond, there is a likelihood that the growth from it of a tertiary frond, will become an habitual characteristic of the variety. Along with the establishment of such a tertiary frond, as shown in Fig. 74, there must arise a further development of mid-rib in the primary frond, as well as in the secondary frond—a develop- ment which must bring with it a greater integration of the two; while, simultaneously, extra growth will take place in such of the rootlets as are most directly connected with this main channel of circulation. Without further explanation it will be seen, on inspecting Figs. 75 and 76, that there may in this manner result an integrated series of fronds, placed alternately on opposite sides of a- connecting vascular strue- ture. That this connecting vascular structure will, as shown in the figures, become more distinct from the foliar surfaces as these multiply, 1s no unwarranted assumption; for we have seen in compound-leaved plants, how, under analogous con- ditions, mid-ribs become developed into separate supporting parts, which acquire some of the characters of axes while as- suming their functions. And now mark how clearly the structure thus built up by integration of proliferously- growing fronds, corresponds with the structure of the more- developed Jungermanniacece. Hach of the fronds successively produced, repeating the characters of its parent, will bear roots; and will bear them in homologous places, as shown. Further, the united mid-ribs having but very little rigidity, will be unable to maintain an erect position. Hence there will result the recumbent, continuously-rooted stem, whicu these types exhibit. Nay, the parallelism is more complete than the figures show. To avoid confusion, the fronds thus supposed to be progressively integrated, have been repre- sented as simple. But, as shown in Fig. 45, these lower types ordinarily have fronds which divide dichotomously, in uch way that one division is larger than the other ; and this 52 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT is just the character of the successive leaves in the higher types. As shown in Fig. 47, each leaf is usually composed of two unequal lobes. A natural concomitant of the mode of growth here de- scribed, is, that the stem, while it increases longitudinally, increases scarcely at all transversely: hence the name Acrogens. Clearly the transverse development of a stem, i3 the correlative, partly of its function as a channel of circula- tion, and partly of its function as a mechanical support. That an axis may lift its attached leaves into the air, implies thickness and solidity proportionate to the mass of such leaves; and an increase of its sap-vessels, also proportionate to the mass of such leaves, is necessitated when the roots are all at one end and the leaves at the other. But in the generality of Acrogens, these conditions, under which arises the necessity for transverse growth of the axis, are absent, wholly or in great part. The stem habitually creeps below the surface, or lies prone upon the surface; and where it vrows in a vertical or inclined direction, does this by at- faching itself to a vertical or inclined object. Moreover, throwing out rootlets, as it mostly does, at intervals through- out its length, it is not called upon in any considerable de- gree, to transfer nutritive materials from one of its ends to the other. Hence this peculiarity which gives their name | to the Acrogens, is a natural accompaniment of the low degree of specialization reached in them. And that it is an incidental and not a necessary peculiarity, is demonstrated by two converse facts. On the one hand, in those higher Acrogens which, like the tree-ferns, lift large masses of foliage into the air, there is just as decided a transverse ex- pansion of the axis as in Exogens. On the other hand, in those Exogens which, like the common Dodder, gain sup- port and nutriment from the surfaces over which they creep, there is no more lateral expansion of the axis than is habit- ual among Acrogens. Concluding, as we are thus fully justi- fied in doing, that the lateral expansion accompanying longi- THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 53 ‘udinal extension, which is a general characteristic of Endogens and Exogens as distinguished from Acrogens, is nothing more than a concomitant of their usually-vertical growth ;* let us now go on to consider how vertical growth originates, and what are the structural changes 1t involves. § 193. Plants depend for their prosperity mainly on air aud light: they dwindle where they are smothered, and thrive where they can expand their leaves into free space and sunshine. Those kinds which assume prone positions, consequently labour under disadvantages in being habitually interfered with by one another—they are mutually shaded and mutually injured. Such of them, however, as happen, by variations in mode of growth, to get at all above the rest, are more likely to flourish and leave offspring than the rest. That is to say, natural selection will favour the more upright- growing forms: individuals with structures that lift them above the rest, are the fittest for the conditions; and by the continual survival of the fittest, such structures must become established. There are two essentially-different ways in which the integrated series of fronds above described, may be modified so as to acquire the stiffness needful for main- taining perpendicularity. We will consider them separately. A thin layer of substance gains greatly in power of re- sisting a transverse strain, if it is bent round so as to form a tube—witness the difference between the pliability of a sheet of paper when outspread, and the rigidity of the same sheet of paper when rolled up. Engineers constantly recognize * Tam indebted to Dr Hooker for pointing out further facts supporting this view. In his Mora Antarctica, he describes the genus Lessonia (see Fig. 37} and especially Z. ovata, as having a mode of growth simulating that of the Exogens. The tall vertical stem thickens as it grows, by the periodical addition of layers to its periphery. Among lichens, too, it seems that there is an analogous case. That even Thallogens should thus, under certain conditions, present a transversely- increasing axis, shows that there is nothing absolute in the character which gives the names to the two highest classes of plants, in contradistinction to the class nearest to them. 54 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMEN’. this truth, in devising appliances by which the greatest strength shall be obtained at the smallest cost of material; and among organisms, we see that natural selection habit- ually establishes structures conforming to the same principle, wherever lightness and stiffness are to be combined. The evlindrical bones of mammals and birds, and the hollow shafts of feathers, are examples. The lower plants, too, furnish cases where the strength needful for maintaining an upright position, is acquired by this rolling up of a flat thallus or frond. In Fig. 77, we have an Alga which ap- proaches towards a tubular distribution of substance ; and which has a consequent rigid- ity. Sundry common forms of lichen, having the thallus folded into a branched tube, still more decidedly display- ing the connexion between this structural arrangement and this mechanical advantage. And from the particular class of plants we are here dealing with—the Acrogens—a type is shown in Fig. 78, fiella helicophylla, similarly cha- racterized by a thin frond that is made stiff enough to stand, by an incurving which, though it does not produce a hollow cylinder, produces a kindred form. If, then, as we have seen, natural selection or survival of the fittest, will favour such among these recumbent Acrogens, as are enabled, by — variations of their structures, to maintain raised postures ; it will favour the formation of fronds that curve round upon themselves, and curve round upon the fronds growing out of them. What, now, will be the result should such a modification take place in the group of proliferous fronds represented in Fig. 76? Clearly, the result will be a structure like that shown in Fig. 79. And if this inrolling becomes more complete, a form like Jungermannia cordifolia, THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. a9) represented in Fig. 80, will be produced. When the successive fronds are thus folded round so com- vletely that their opposite edges meet, these opposite edges will be apt to unite : not that they will grow together after being formed, but that they willdevelopin connexion; or, in botanical language, will become “adnate.”’ That foliar surfaces which, in their embryonic state, are in close contact, often join into one, is a familiar fact. It is habitually so with sepals or divisions of the calyx. In all campanulate flowers it is so with petals. And in some tribes of plants it is so with stamens. We are therefore well-warranted in inferring, that under the conditions above described, the suc- cessive fronds or leafiets will, by union of their remote edges, first at their points of origin, and afterwards higher up, form sheaths inserted one within another, and including the AXIS. This incurving of the successive fronds, ending in the formation of sheaths, may be accompanied by different sets of modifications. Supposing Fig. 81 ‘to be a transverse section of such a type (a being the mid-rib, and b the expansion of an older frond; while ¢c is a younger frond proliferously developed within it), there may begin two di- vergent kinds of changes, leading to two contrasted struc- tures. If, while frond continues to grow out of frond, the series of united mid-ribs continues to be the channel of circu- lation between the uppermost fronds and the roots—if, as a consequence, the compound mid-rib, or rudimentary axis, con- _ tinues to increase in size laterally ; there will arise the series of transitional forms represented by the transverse sections 82, 83, 84, 85; ending in the production of a solid axis, everywhere wrapped round by tlie foliar surface of tho frond, as an outer layer or sheath. But if, on the other 56 MORPHOLUGICAL DEVELOPMENT. hand, circumstances favour a form of plant which maintains its uprightness at the smallest cost of substance—if the vascular bundles of each succeeding mid-rib, instead of re- " maining concentrated, become distributed all round the tube formed by the infolded frond; then the structure eventually reached, through the transitional forms 86, 87, 88, 89, will be a hollow cylinder. And now observe how the two structures thus produced, correspond with two kinds of Endogens. Fig. 90 represents a species of Dendrobium, in which we see clearly how each leaf is but a continuation of the external layer of a solid axis—a sheath such as would result from the infolded edges of a frond becoming adnate ; and on examining how the sheath of each leaf includes the one above it, and how the successive sheaths include the axis, it will be manifest that the relations of parts are just such as exist in the united series of fronds shown in Fig. 79—the successive nodes answering to the successive points of origin of the fronds. Conversely, the stem of a grass, Fig. 91, dis- plays just such relations of parts, as would result from the de- velopment of the type shown in Fig. 79, if instead of the mid- ribs thickening into a solid axis, the matter composing them became evenly distributed round the foliar surfaces, at the THE MORPHGLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. DL same time that the incurved edges of the foliar surfaces united. The arrangements of the tubular axis and its ap- pendages, thus resulting, are still more instructive than those of the solid axis. For while, even more clearly than in the Dendrobium, we see at the point b, a continuity of structure between the substance of the axis below the node, and the substance of the sheath above the node; we see that this sheath, instead of having its edges united as in Dendrobium, has them simply overlapping, so as to form an incomplete hollow cylinder which may be taken off and unrolled; and we see that were the overlapping edges of this sheath, united all the way from the node a to the node b, it would constitute a tubular axis, like that which precedes it or like that which it includes. And then, giving an unexpected conclusiveness to the argument, it turns out that in one family of grasses, the overlapping edges of the sheaths do unite: thus furnishing us with a demonstration that tubular structures ave produced by the incurving and joining o7 foliar surfaces; and that so, hollow axes may be interpreted as above, without making any assumption unwarranted by fact. One further correspondence between the type thus ideally constructed, and the endogenous type, must ve noted. If, as already pointed out, the transverse growth of 98 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. an axis arises, when the axis comes to be a channel of circus lation between all tne roots at one of its extremities and all the leaves at the other; and if this lateral bulging must in- crease, as fast as the quantity of foliage to be brought in communication with the roots increases—especially if such foliage has at the same time to be raised high above the earth’s surface ; what must happen to a plant constructed in the manner just described? ‘The elder fronds or foliar or- gans, ensheathing those within them, as well as the incipient AXIS serving as a bond of union, are at first of such circum- ference only as suffices to inclose these undeveleped parts. What, then, will take place when the inclosed parts grow— when the axis thickens while it elongates? Evidently the earliest-formed sheaths, not being large enough for the swelling axis, must burst; and evidently each of the later- formed sheaths must, in its turn, do the like. There must result a gradual exfoliation of the successive sheaths, like that indicated as beginning in the above figure of Dendio- bium ; which, at a, shows the bud of the undeveloped parts Just visible above the enwrapping sheaths, while at b, and c¢, it shows the older sheaths in process of being split open. That is to say, there must result the mode of growth which helps to give the name Endogens to this class. The other way in which an integrated series of fronds may acquire the rigidity needful for maintaining an erect position, has next to be considered. If the successive fronds do not acquire such habit of curling as may be taken ad- vantage of by natural selection, so as to produce the requisite stiffness ; then, the only way in which the requisite stiffness appears producible, is by the thickening and hardening of the fused series of mid-ribs. The incipient axis will not, in this case, be inclosed by the rolled-up fronds; but will con- tinue exposed. Survival of the fittest will favour the genesis of a type, in which those portions of the successive mid-ribs that enter into the continuous bond, become more bulky than the disengaged portions of the mid-ribs: the individuals THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 39 which thrive and have the best chances of leaving offspring, being, by the hypothesis, individuals having axes stiff enough to raise their foliage above that of their fellows At the same time, under the same influences, there will tend to result an elongation of those portions of the-mid-ribs, which become parts of the incipient axis ; seeing that it will profit the plant to have its leaves so far removed from one another, as to prevent mutual interferences. Hence, from the recumbent type, there will evolve, by indirect equilibration, (§ 167) such modifications as are shown in Figs. 92, 93, 94: the first of which is a slight advance on the ideal type represented in Fig. 76, arising in the way described; and the others of which are actual plants—Jungermannia Hooker, and J. decipiens. Thus the higher Acrogens show us how, along with an assumption of the upright attitude, there docs go on, as we see there must go on, a separation of the leaf: producing parts from the root-producing parts; a greater development of that connecting portion of the successive fronds, by which they are kept in communication with the roots, and raised above the ground; and a consequent in- creased differentiation of such connecting portion from the parts attached to it. And this lateral bulging of the axis, directly or indirectly consequent on its functions as a support 60 - MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. and 4 channel, being here unrestrained by the early-formed fronds folded round it, goes on without the bursting of these. Hence arises a leading character of what is called exogenous growth—a growth which is, however, still habitually accom- panied by exfoliation, in flakes, of the outermost layer, con- tinually being cracked and split by the accumulation of layers within it. And now if we examine plants of the exogenous type, we find among them many displaying the stages of this metamorphosis. In Fig. 95, is shown a form in which the continuity of the axis with the mid-rib of the leaf, is manifest—a continuity that is conspicuous in the common thistle. Here the foliar expansion, running some distance down the axis, makes the included portion of the axis a part of its mid-rib; just asin the ideal types above drawn. By the greater growth of the internodes, which are very variable, not only in different plants but in the same plant, there results a modification like that delineated in Fig. 96. And then, in such forms as Fig. 97, there is shown the arrangement that arises when, by more rapid develop- ment of the proximal portion of the mid-rib, the distal part of the foliar surface is separated from the part which em- braces the axis: the wings of the mid-rib still serving, how- ever, to connect the two portions of the foliar surface. Such a separation is, as pointed out in § 188, an habitual occur- rence ; and in some compound leaves, an actual tearing of the inter-veinous tissue, is caused by extra growth of the mid-rib. Modifications like this, and the further one in Fig. 98, we may expect to be established by survival of the fittest, among THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 61 (lose plants which produce considerable masses of leaves, s'nce the development of mid-ribs into footstalks, by throw- ing the leaves further away from the axes, will diminish the shading of the leaves, one by another. And then, among plants of bushy growth, in which the assimilating surfaces become still more liable to intercept one another’s light, natural selection will continue to give an advantage to those which carry their assimilating surfaces at the ends of the petioles, and do not develop assimilating surfaces close to the axis, where they are most shaded. Whence will result a disappearance of the stipules and the foliar fringes of the mid-ribs ; ending in the production of the ordinary stalked leaf, Fig. 99, which is characteristic of trees. MeanwLile, the axis thickens in proportion to the number of leaves it has to carry, and to put in communication with the roots ; and so there comes to be a more marked contrast between it and the vetioles, severally carrying a leaf each.* § 194. When, in the course of the process above sketched out, there has arisen such community of nutrition among the fronds thus integrated into a series, that the younger ones are aided by materials which the older ones have elaborated ; the younger fronds will begin to show, at earlier and earlier periods of development, the structures about to originate from them. Abundant nutrition will abbreviate the intervals between the successive prolifications; so that eventually, while each frond is yet imperfectly formed, the rudiment of the next will begin to show itself. All embryology justifies this inference. The analogies it furnishes lead us to expect that when this serial arrangement becomes organic, the growing part of the series will show the general relations of * Since this paragraph was put in type, I have observed that in some varieties of Cineraria, as probably in other plants, a single individual furnishes all these forms of leaves—all gradations between unstipulated leaves on long petioles, and leaves that embrace the axis. It may be added that the distribution of these va- rious forms, is quite in harmony with the rationale above given. 62 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. the forthcoming parts, while they are very small and un. specialized. What will in such case be the appearances they — assumed ? We shall have no difficulty in perceiving what it will be, if we take a form lke that shown m Fig. 92, and dwarf its several parts at the same time that we generalize them. Figs. 100, 101, 102, and 103, will show the result; and in Fig. 104, which is the bud of an exogen, we see how = 2M. aes = S? we #09 402 02 103 \ Zog\ } clear is the morphological correspondence: a being the rudiment of a foliar organ beginning to take shape; b being the almost formless rudiment of the next foliar organ; and c being the quite-undifferentiated part whence the rudiments of subsequent foliar organs are to arise. And now we are prepared for entering on a still-remaining _question respecting the structure of Phanogams—what is the origin of axillary buds? As the synthesis at present stands, it does not account for these; but on looking a little more closely into the matter, we shall find that the axillary buds are interpretable in the same manner as the terminal buds. So to interpret them, however, we must return to that pro- cess of proliferous growth with which we set out, for the pur- pose of observing some facts not before named. Delesseria hypoglossum, Fig. 105, represents a seaweed of the same genus as one outlined in Fig. 40; but of a species in which pro- liferous growth is carried much further. Here, not only does the primary frond bud out many secondary fronds from its mid-rib ; but most of the secondary fronds similarly bud out several tertiary fronds; and even by some of the tertiary fronds, this prolification is repeated. Besides being shown that the budding out of several fronds from one frond, may become habitual; we are also shown that it may become a habit inherited by the fronds so produced, and also by the THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 63 fronds they produce: the manifestation of the tendency, being probably limited only by failure of nutrition. That under fit conditions, an analogous mode of growth will occur in fronds of the acrogenic type, like those we set out with, ia shown by the case of Jungermannia furcata, Figs. -45, 46, in which such compound prolification is partially displayed. Let us suppose then, that the frond a, Fig. 106, produces not only a single secondary frond b, but also another such secondary frond, U'. Let us suppose, further, that the frond b is in like manner doubly proliferous: producing both ¢ and cl. Lastly, let us suppose that in the second frond D! which a produces, as well as in the second frond ¢ which 6 produces, the doubly-proliferous habit is manifested. If, now, this habit grows organic—if it becomes, as it natur- ally will become, the characteristic of a plant of luxuriant growth, the unfolding parts of which can be fed by the un- folded parts; it will happen with each lateral series, as with the main series, that its successive components will begin to shcw themselves at earlier and earlier stages of development. And in the same way that, by dwarfing and generalizing 37 b4 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. the original series, we arrive at a structure like that of the terminal bud; by dwarfing and generalizing a lateral series, as shown in Figs. 107—110, we arrive at a structure an- swering in nature and position to the axillary bud, \ AX et al Facts confirming these interpretations, are afforded by the structure and distribution of buds. The phenogamic axis In its primordial form, being an integrated series of folia; and the development of that part by which these folia are held together at considerable distances from one another, taking place afterwards; it is inferable from the general principles of embryology, that in its rudimentary stages, the pheenogamic axis will have its foliar parts much more clearly marked out than its axial parts. This we see in every bud. Every bud consists of the rudiments of leaves packed to- gether without any appreciable internodal spaces; and the internodal spaces begin to increase with rapidity, only when the foliar organs have been considerably developed. More- over, where nutrition is defective, and arrest of development takes place—that is, where a flower is formed—the inter- nodes remain undeveloped: the process of unfolding ceases — before the later-acquired characters of the phenogamic axis are assumed. Lastly, as the hypothesis leads us to expect, axillary buds make their appearances later than the foliar organs which they accompany; and where, as at the ends of axes, these foliar organs show failure of chlorophyll, the axillary buds are not produced at all. That these are in- ferable traits of structure, will be manifest on contemplating © Figs. 106—110; and on observing, first, that the doubly- proliferous tendency of which the axillary bud is a result, im- plies abundant nutrition; and on observing, next, that the original place of secondary prolification, is such that the foliar 107 THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 65 surface on which it occurs, must grow to some extent before the bud appears. On thus looking at the matter—on contemplating afresh the ideal type shown in Fig. 106, and noting how, by the conditions of the case, the secondary prolifications must cease before that primary prolification which produces the main axis; we are enabled to reconcile all the phenomena of axil- lary gemmation. We see harmony among the several facts— first, that the axillary bud becomes a lateral, leaf-bearing axis if there is abundant material for growth; second, that its development is arrested, or it becomes a flower-bearing axis, if the supply of sap is but moderate; third, that it is absent when the nutrition is failing. We are no longer committed to the gratuitous assumption, that in the pheno- gamic type, there must exist an axillary bud to each foliar organ; but we are led to conclude, @ priori, that which we find, a posteriori, that axillary buds are as normally absent in flowers as they are normally present lower down the axis. And then, to complete the argument, we are prepared for the corollary that axillary prolification may naturally arise even at the ends of axes, provided the failing nutrition which causes the dwarfing of the foliar organs to form a flower, be suddenly changed into such high nutrition as to transform the components of the flower into appendages that are green, if not otherwise leaf-like—a condition under which only, this phenomenon is proved to occur. § 195. One more question presents itself, when we con- trast the early stages of development in the two classes of Phenogams; and a further answer supplied by the hypothe- sis, gives to the hypothesis a further probability. It is cha- racteristic of an endogen, to have a single seed-leaf or coty- ledon ; and it is characteristic of an exogen, to have at least two cotyledons, if not more than two. That is to say, the monocotyledonous mode of germination everywhere co- exists with the endogenous mode of growth; and along with 56 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. the exogenous mode of growth, there always goes either a dicotyledonous or polycotyledonous germination. Why is this? Such correlations cannot be accidental—cannot be meaningless. A true theory of the phenogamic types, in their origin and divergence, should account for the connex- ion of these traits. Let us see whether the foregoing theory does this. The higher plants, like the higher animals, bequeath to their offspring more or less of nutriment and structure. Superior organisms of either kingdom do not, as do all in- ferior organisms, cast off their progeny in the shape of minute portions of protoplasm, unorganized and without stocks of material fit for them to organize; but they either deposit along with the germs they cast off, certain quantities of albumenoid substance, fit for them to appropriate while they develop themselves, or else they continue to supply such substance while the germs partially-develop themselves before their detachment. -Among plants, this constitutes the dis- tinction between seeds and spores. Every seed contains a store of food to serve the young plant during the first stages of its independent life; and usually, too, before the seed is detached, the young plant is so far advanced in structure, that it bears to the attached stock of nutriment much the same relation that the young fish bears to the appended yelk- bag at the time of leaving the egg. Sometimes, indeed, the development of chlorophyll gives the seed-leaves a bright green, while the seed is still contained in the parent- pod. This early organization of the pheeno- gam, must be supposed rudely to indicate the type out of which the phenogamic type arose. On the foregomg hypo- thesis, the seed-leaves therefore represent the primordial fronds—which, indeed, they simulate in their simple, cellular, unveined structures. And the question here to be asked is— do the different relations of the parts in young endogens and exogens correspond with the different relations of the primor- dial fronds, severally implied by the endogenous and the THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 67 exogenous modes of growth? We shall find that they do. Starting, as before, with the proliferous form shown in Fig. 111, it is clear that if the strength required for main- taining the vertical attitude, is obtained by the rolling up of the fronds, the primary frond will more and more conceal the secondary frond within it. At the same time, the secondary frond must continue to be dependent on the first for its nutri- tion; and being produced within the first, must be prevented by defective supply of light and air, from ever becoming syn- chronous in its development with the first. Hence, this infolding which leads to the endogenous mode of growth, inplies that there must always continue such pre-eminence 120 IX \ 421 Hf of the tirst-formed frond or its representative, as to make the germination monocotyledonous. Figs. 111 to 115, show the transitional forms that would result from the infolding of the fronds. In Fig. 116, a vertical section of the form repre- sented in Fig. 115, are exhibited the relations of the succes- 68 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. sive fronds to each other. The modified relations that would result, if the nutrition of the embryo admitted of anticipatory development of the successive fronds, is shown in Fig. 117. And how readily the structure may pass into that of the monocotyledonous germ, will be seen on inspecting Fig. 118; which is a vertical section of an actual monocotyledon at an early stage—the incomplete lines at the left of its root, indi- cating its connexion with the seed.* Contrariwise, where the strength required for maintaining an upright atti- tude is not obtained by the rolling up of the fronds, but by the strengthening of the continuous mid-rib, the second frond, so far from being less favourably circumstanced than the first, becomes in some respects even more favourably circumstanced: being above the other, it gets a greater share of light, and it is less restricted by surrounding obstacles. There is nothing, therefore, to prevent it from rapidly gaining an equality with the first. And if we assume, as the truths ot embryology entitle us to do, an increasing tendency towards anticipation in the development of subsequent fronds—if we assume that here, as in other cases, structures which were originally produced in succession, will, if the nutrition allows and no mechanical dependence hinders, come to be pro duced simultaneously ; there is nothing to prevent the pas- sage of the type represented in Fig. 111, into that represented * Since these figures were put on the block, it has occurred to me that the relations would be still clearer, were the primary frond represented as not taking part in these processes of modification, which have been described as giving rise to the erect form; as, indeed, the rooting of its under surface will prevent it from doing in any considerable degree. In such case, each of the Figs. 111 to 117, should have a horizontal rooted frond at its base, homologous with the pro-em- bryo among Acrogens. This primary frond would then more manifestly stand in the same relation to the rest, as the cotyledon does to the plumule—both by position, and as a supplier of nutriment. Fig. 117 a, which I am enabled to add, shows that this would complete the interpretation. Of the dicotyledonous series, it is needful to edd no further explanation than that the difference in habit of growth, will permit the second frond to root itself as well as the first; and so to become an additional source of nutrition, similarly circumstanced to the firat and equal with it. THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 69 in Fig. 122. Or rather, there is everything to facilitate it ; seeing that natural selection will continually favour the pro- duction of a form in which the second frond grows in such way as not to shade the first, and in such way as allows the axis readily to assume a vertical position. Thus, then, is interpretable the universal connexion between monocotyledonous germination and endogenous growth; as well as the similarly-universal connexion between exogenous growth and the development of two or more cotyledons. That it explains these fundamental relations, adds very greatly to the probability of the hypothesis. § 196. While we are in this manner enabled to discern the kinship that exists between the higher vegetal types themselves, as well as between them and the lower types; we are at the same time supplied with a rationale of those truths which vegetal morphologists have established. Those homo- logies which Wolff indicated in their chief outlines and Goethe followed out in detail, have a new meaning given to them when we regard the phenogamic axis as having been evolved in the way described. Forming the modified con- ception which we are here led to do, respecting the units of which a flowering plant is composed, we are no longer left without an answer to the question— What is an axis? And we are helped to understand the naturalness of those cor- respondences which the successive members of each shoot display. Let us glance at the facts from our present stand- point. The unit of composition of a Phenogam, is such portion of a shoot as answers to one of the primordial fronds. This portion is neither one of the foliar appendages nor one of the internodes; but it consists of a foliar appendage together with the preceding internode, including the axillary bud where this is developed. The parts intercepted by the dotted lines in Fig. 123, constitute such a segment; and the true homology is between this and any other foliar organ with the * 70 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. portion of the axis below it. And now observe how, when we take this for the unit of composition, the metamorphoses which the phenogamic axis displays, are inferable from known laws of development. Embryology teaches us that arrest of development shows itself first in the absence of those parts ‘hat have arisen latest in the course of evolution; that if defect of nutrition causes an earlier arrest, parts that are of more ancient origin abort; and that the part alone produced when the supply of materials fails near the outset, is the prim- ordial part. We must infer, therefore, that in each seg- ment of a Phznogam, the foliar organ, which answers to the primordial frond, will be the most constant element; and that the internode and the axillary bud, will be successively less constant. This we find. Along with a smaller size of foliar surface implying lower nutrition, it is usual to see a much-diminished internode and a less-pronounced axillary bud, as in Fig. 124. On approaching the flower, the ALS VU 427 128 129 axillary bud disappears; and the segment is reduced to a small foliar surface, with an internode which is in most cases very short if not absent, as in 125 and 126. In the flower itself, axillary buds and internodes are both want- ing: there remains only a foliar surface (127), which, though often larger than the immediately preceding foliar surface, shows failing nutrition by absence of chlorophyll. And then, in the quite terminal organs of fructification (129), we have the foliar part itself reduced to a mere rudiment. Though these progressive degenerations are by no means regular, being in many cases varied by adaptation to par- * ticular requirements, yet it cannot, I think, be questioned, THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 71 that the general relations are as described, and that they are such as the hypothesis leads us to expect. Nor are we without a kindred explanation of certain remaining traits of foliar organs in their least-developed forms. Petals, stamens, pistils, &c., besides reminding us of the primordial fronds by their diminished sizes, and by the want of those several supplementary parts which the preceding segments possess, also remind us of them by their histological charac- ters: they consist of simple cellular tissue, scarcely at all differentiated. The fructifying cells, too, which here make their appearance, are borne in ways like those in which the lower Acrogens bear them—at the edge of the frond, or at the end of a peduncle, or immersed in the general substance ; as in Figs. 128 and 129. Nay, it might even be said that the colours assumed by these terminal folia, call to mind the plants out of which we conclude that Phenogams have been evolved; for it is said of the fronds of the Jungermanniacee, that ‘though under certain circumstances of a pure green, they are inclined to be shaded with red, purple, chocolate, or other tints.” As thus understood, then, the homologies among the parts of the phzenogamic axis are interpretable, not as due to a needless adhesion to some typical form or fulfilment of a pre- determined plan; but as the inevitable consequences of the mode in which the pheenogamic axis originates. § 197. And now it remains only to observe, in confirmation of the foregoing synthesis, that it at once explains for us . various irregularities. When we see leaves sometimes pro- ducing leaflets from their edges or extremities, we recognize in the anomaly, a resumption of an original mode of growth: fronds frequently do this. When we learn that a flowering plant, as the Drosera intermedia, has been known to develop a young plant from the surface of one of its leaves, we are at once reminded of the proliferous growths and fructifying organs in the Liverworts. The occasional production of bul- ‘ 72 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. bils by Pheenogams, ceases to be so surprising when we find it to be habitual among the inferior Acrogens; and when we see that it is but a repetition, on a higher stage, of that self- detachment which is common among proliferously-produced fronds. Nor are we any longer without a solution of that transformation of foliar organs into axial organs, which not uncommonly takes place. How this last irregularity of development is to be accounted for, we will here pause a moment to consider. Let us first glance at our data. The form of every organism, we have seen, must depend on the structures of its physiological units. Any group of such physiological units will tend to arrange itself into the complete organism, if it is uncontrolled and placed in fit conditions. Hence the development of fertilized germs; and hence the development of those self-detached cells which characterize some plants. Conversely, physiological units which form a small group involved ina larger group, and are subject to all the forces of the larger group, will become sub- ordinate in their structural arrangements to the larger group —will be co-ordinated into a part of the major whole, in- stead of co-ordinating themselves into a minor whole. This antithesis will be clearly understood on remembering how, on the one hand, a small detached part of a hydra soon moulds itself into the shape of an entire hydra; and how, on the other hand, the cellular mass that buds out in place of a lobster’s lost claw, gradually assumes the form of.a claw —has its parts so moulded as to complete the structure of the organism: a result which we cannot but ascribe to the ‘ forces which the rest of the organism exerts upon it. Con- sequently, among plants, we may expect that whether any portion of protoplasm moulds itself into the typical form around an axis of its own, or is moulded into a part subor- dinate to another axis, will depend on the relative mass of its physiological units—the accumulation of them that has taken place before the assumption of any structural arrange- ment. A few illustrations will make clear the validity of THE MORPHOLOGILAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. - 7d this inference. In the compound leaf, Fig. 65, the several lateral growths a, b, c, d, are manifestly homologous ; and on comparing a number of such leaves together, it will be seen that one of these lateral growths may assume any de- gree of complexity, according to the degree of its’ nutrition. Every fern leaf exemplifies the same general truth still bet- ter. Whether each sub-frond remains an undeveloped wing of the main frond, or whether it organizes itself into a group of frondlets borne by a secondary rib, or whether, going further, as it often does, it gives rise to tertiary ribs, is clearly determined by the supply of materials for growth ; since such higher developments are habitually most marked at points where the nutrition is greatest; namely, next the stem. But the clearest evidence is afforded among the Alge, which, not drawing nutriment from roots, have their parts much less mutually dependent; and are therefore capable of showing more clearly, how any part may remain an append- age or may become the parent of appendages, according to circumstances. In the annexed Fig. 130, representing a branch of Ptilota plumosa, _ we see how a wing grows into a wing-bear- ing branch, if its nutrition passes a certain point. This form, so strikingly like that of the feathery crystallizations of many imor- ganic substances, proves to us that, as in such crystallizations, the simplicity or com- plexity of structure at any place, depends on the quantity of matter that has to be polarized at that place in a given time.* * How the element of time modifies the result, is shown by the familiar fact that erystals rapidly formed are small; and that they become larger when they are formed more slowly. If the quantity of molecules contained in a solution is rela- tively great, so that the mutual polarities of the molecules crowded together in every place throughout the solution are intense, there arises a crystalline aggre- gation around local axes ; whereas, in proportion as the local action of melecules on one another is rendered less intense by their wider dispersion, they become 74 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. Hence, then, we are not without an interpretation of those over-developments which the pheenogamic axis occasionally undergoes. Fig. 104, represents the phanogamic bud in its rudimentary state. The lateral process b, which ordinarily becomes a foliar appendage, differs very little from the terminal process c, which is to become an axis—differs mainly in having, at this period when its form is being determined, a smaller bulk. If while thus undifferentiated, its nutrition remains inferior to that of the terminal process, it becomes moulded into a part that is subordimate to the general axis. But if, as sometimes happens, there is supplied to it such an abundance of the materials needful for growth, that it becomes as large as the terminal process; then we may naturally expect it to begin moulding itself round an axis of its own: a foliar organ will be replaced by an axial organ. And this result will be especially liable to occur, when the growth of the axis has been previously under- going that arrest which leads to the formation of a flower; that is, when, from defect of materials, the terminal process has almost ceased to increase, and when some concurrence of favourable causes, brings a sudden access of sap, which reaches the lateral processes before it reaches the terminal process. § 198. The general conclusion to which these various lines of evidence converge, is, then, that the shoot of a flowering plant is an aggregate of the third degree of composition. Taking as aggregates of the first order, those small masses of protoplasm which ordinarily assume the forms under whch they are known as cells; and considering as aggregates of the second order, those assemblages of such cells which, in the lower cryptogamia, compose the various kinds of thal- lus; then that structure, common’ to the higher cryptogams and to phenogams, in which we find a series of such groups relatively more subordinate to the forces exerted on them by the larger aggre gates of molecules that are at greater distances, and thus are left to arrange themselves round fewer axes into larger crystals, THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF PLANTS. 79 of cells bound up into a continuous whole, must be regarded as an aggregate of the third order. The inference drawn from analysis, and verified by a synthesis that corresponds in a remarkable manner with the facts, is, that those compound parts which, in Endogens and Exogens, are called axes, have really arisen by integration of such simple parts as in lower plants are called fronds. Here, on a higher level, ap- pears to have taken place a repetition of the process already observed on lower levels. The formation of those small groups of physiological units which compose the lowest protophytes, is itself a process of integration ; and the con- solidation of such groups into definitely-circumscribed and coherent cells, is a completing of the process. In those coalescences, variously carried on, by which many such cells are joined into threads, and discs, and solid or flattened- out masses, we see these morphological units aggregating into units of a compound kind—the different phases of the transition being exemplified by groups of various sizes, various degrees of cohesion, and various degrees of definite- ness. Once more do we now find evidences of a like process on a larger scale: the compound groups are again com- pounded, And, as before, there are not wanting types of organization by which the stages of this higher imtegration are shadowed forth. From fronds that occasionally produce other fronds from their surfaces, we pass to those that habitually produce them. From those that do so in an in- definite manner, to those that do so in a definite manner. And from those that do so singly, to those that do so doubly and triply through successive generations of fronds. Even within the limits of a sub-class, we find gradations between fronds irregularly proliferous, and groups of such fronds united into a regular series. Nor does the process end here. The flowering plant is rarely uniaxial—it is nearly always multiaxial. From its primary shoot, there grow out secondary shoots of like kind. Thovgh occasionally among Phznogams, and frequently 76 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. among the higher Cryptogams, the germs of new axes detach themselves under the form of bulbils, and develop separately instead of in connexion with the parent axis; yet in most Pheenogams, the germ of each new axis maintains its con- nexion with the parent axis: whence results a group of axes -——an aggregate of the fourth order. Every tree, by the pro- duction of branch out of branch, shows us this integration repeated over and over again: forming an aggregate having a degree of composition too complex to be any longer defined. CHAP EEE EV. THE MORPIIOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. § 199. Wuar was said in § 180, respecting the ultimate structure of organisms, holds more manifestly of animals than of plants. That throughout the vegetal kingdom the cell is the morphological unit, is a proposition admitting of a better defence, than the proposition that the cell is the mor- phological unit throughout the animal kingdom. The qualifi- cations with which, as we saw, the cell-doctrine must be taken, are qualifications thrust upon us more especially by the facts which zoologists have brought to light. It is among the Protozoa that there occur numerous cases of vital activity displayed by specks of protoplasm; and from the minute anatomy of all creatures above these, up to the Teleozoa, are drawn the numerous proofs that non-cellular tissues may arise by direct metamorphosis of structureless colloidal sub- stance. Our survey of morphological composition throughout the animal kingdom, must therefore begin with those undiffer- entlated aggregates of physiological units, out of which are formed what we call, with considerable license, morphological units. § 200. In that division of the Protozoa distinguished as Rhizopoda, are presented, under various modifications, these minute portions of living organic matter, so little differenti- 78 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. ated, if not positively undifferentiated, that animal individu- ality can scarcely be claimed for them. Figs. 131, 132, and (7 ae tC 13 133, represent certain nearly-allied types of these—Amebu, Actinophrys, and Lreberkiihnia. The viscid jelly or sarcode, comparable in its physical properties to white of egg, out of which one of these creatures is mainly formed, shows us in various ways, the feebleness with which the component physio- logical units are integrated—shows us this by its very slight cohesion, by the extreme indefiniteness and mutability of its form, and by the absence of a limiting membrane. Though unqualified adherents of the cell-doctrine assert that the Amceba has an investment, yet since this investment, com- pared by Dujardin to the film which forms on the surface of paste, does not prevent the taking of solid particles into the mass of the body, and does not, in such kindred forms as Fig. 133, prevent the pseudopodia from coalescing when they meet, it cannot be anything deserving the name of a cell- wall. A considerable portion of the body, however, in Difflu- gia, Fig. 134, has a denser coating; so that the protrusion of the pseudopodia is limited to one part of it. And in the solitary Foraminifera, like Gromia, the sarcode is covered over most of its surface by a delicate calcareous shell, pierced with minute holes, through which the slender pseudopodia are thrust. The Gregarina exhibits an advance in integration, and a consequent greater definiteness. Figs. 135 and 136, exemplifying this type, show the complete membrane in which the substance of the creature is con- tained. Here there has arisen what may be properly called a cell: under its solitary form this animal is truly unicellular. _Its embryology has considerable significance. After passing through a certain quiescent, ‘‘ encysted”’ state, its interior breaks up into small portions, which, after their exit, assume THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. Fas. forms like that of the Ameba; and from this young condi- tion in which they are undifferentiated, they pass into that adult condition in which they have limiting membranes. If this development of the individual Gregarina typifies the mode of evolution of the species, it yields further support to the belief, that homogeneous fragments of sarcode existed earlier than any of the structures which are properly called cells. Among aggregates of the first order, there are some much more highly developed. These are the Infu- soria; constituting the most numerous of the Protozoa, in species as in individuals. Figs. 137, 138, and 139, are ex- amples. In them we find, along with greater definiteness, a considerable heterogeneity. The sarcode of which the body consists, has an indurated outer layer, bearing cilia and some- times spines; there 1s an opening serving as mouth, a per- manent cesophagus, and a cavity or cavities, temporarily formed in the interior of the sarcode, to serve as one or more stomachs ; and there 1s a comparatively specific arrangement of these and various minor parts. Thus in the animal kingdom, as in the vegetal kingdom, there exists a class of minute forms having this peculiarity, that no one of them is separable into a number of visible com- ponents homologous with one another—no one of them can be resolved into minor individualities. Its proximate units are those physiological units of which we conclude every or- ganism consists. The aggregate is an aggregate of the first order. § 201. Among plants are found types indicating a transi- tion from aggregates of the first order to aggregates of the second order ; and among animals we find analogous types. But the stages of progressing integration are not here so dis- tinct. The reason probably is, that the simplest animals, having individualities much less marked than those of the simplest plants, do not afford us the same facilities for ob- servution. In proportion as the limits of the minor indi- 08 80 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. vidualities are indefinite, the formation of major individu- alities out of them, naturally leaves less conspicuous traces. Be this as it may, however, in such types of Protozoa as the Thalassicolle, we find that though there is reason to re- gard the aggregate as an aggregate of the second order, yet its divisibility into minor individualities like those just de- scribed, is by no means manifest. Fig. 140, representing "KZ 990? aos OD 23-59% 0s I SENIEED.. = PET | Spherozoum punctatum, one of this group, illustrates the diffi- culty. Only by some license of interpretation, can we regard the “celleeform bodies”’ contained in it, as the morphological units of the animal. The jelly-like mass in which they are imbedded, shows no signs of being divisible into portions having each a cell or nucleus for its centre.* Comparison of the various forms assumed by creatures of this type, suggests, contrariwise, that the homogeneous sarcode is primary, and its included structures secondary. Among the Foraminifera, we find evidence of the coalescence of aggre- gates of the first order, into aggregates of the second order. There are solitary Foraminifers, allied to the creature repre- sented in Fig. 134. Certain ideal types of combination * This statement seems at variance with the figure; but the figure is very in- accurate. Its inaccuracy curiously illustrates the vitiation of evidence. When I saw the drawing on the block, I pointed out to the-draughtsman, that he had made the surrounding curves much more obviously related to the contained bodies, than they were in the original (in Dr Carpenter’s Foraminifera); and having Iccked on while he in great measure remedied this defect, thought no further care was needed. Now, however, on seeing the figure in the printer’s proof, I find that the engraver, swayed by the same supposition as the draughtsman that such a relation was meant to be shown, has made his lines represent it still more de- cidedly than those of the draughtsman before they were corrected. Thus, vague linear representations, like vague verbal ones, are apt to grow more definite when repeated. Hypcthesis warps perceptions as it warps thoughts. THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS, 81 amony them, are shown in Fig. 141. And setting out from — these, we may ascend in various directions to kinds com- pounded to an immense variety of degrees in an immense variety of ways. In all of them, however, the separability of © the major individuality into minor individualities, is very in- complete. The portion of sarcode contained in one of these calcareous chambers, gives origin to an external bud; and this presently becomes covered, like its parent, with calcareous matter: the position in which each successive chamber is so produced, determining the form of the compound shell. But the portions of sarcode thus budded out one from another, do not become distinctly individualized. Fig. 142, representing the living net-work which remains when the shell of an Or- bitolite has been dissolved, shows the continuity that exists among the occupants of its aggregated chambers. Still, the occupant of each chamber may fairly be considered as homo- logous with a solitary Foraminifer; and if so, the Orbitolite is an ageregate of the second order: this indefinite marking- off of its morphological units, being the obverse of the fact that the individualities of their prototypes are feebly pro- - nounced. Forms of essentially the same kind are aggregated in another manner among the Spongide. The fibres of a living sponge are clothed with gelatinous substance, which is separable into Ameba-like creatures, capable of moving about by their pseudopodia when detach- ed. These nucleated portions of sarcode, which are the morphological units of the sponge, lining all its channels and chambers, subsist on the nutritive particles brought to them by the currents of water that are drawn in through the superficial pores, and sent out through the larger open- ings—currents produced by ciliated units, such as are shown in Fig. 143. So that, in the words of Prof. Huxley, ‘the sponge represents a kind of subaqueous city, where the people are arranged about the streets and roads, in such a manner, that each can easily appropriate his food from the water as it passes along.” In the compound Infusoria, the 82 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMEYT. component units remain quite distinct. Being, as aggre: gates of the first order, much more definitely organized, their union into aggregates of the second order does not de- stroy their original individuelities, Among the Vorticell, of which two kinds are delineated in Figs. 144 and 145, there are various illustrations of this: the members of the com- munity being sometimes appended toa single stem; some» times attached by long separate stems to a common base ; and sometimes massed together. | Thus far, these aggregates of the second order exhibit but indefinite individualities. The integration is physical; but not physiological. Though, in the Thalassicolle, there is a shape that has some symmetry; and though, in the Fora- minifera, the formation of successive chambers proceeds in such methodic ways, as to produce quite-regular and tolerably-spe- cific shells; yet no more in these than in the Sponges or the compound Vorticelle, do we find such co-ordination as gives the whole a life predominating over the lives of its parts. We have not yet reached an aggregate of the second order, so individuated as to be capable of sefving as a unit in still Va higher combinations. But in ix ee vey __ the class Ceelenterata, this ad- ~ 3 Gas vance is displayed. The com- 146 WES 2 5 YY so a i mon Hydra, habitually taken as i) G2 fe o the type of the lowest division ( ON ot thi class, has specialized parts performing mutually-subservient functions ; and thus exhibiting a total life distinct from the lives of the units. Fig. 146 represents one of these creatures in its contracted state and in its expanded state; while Fig. 147 is a rude diagram from memory showing the wall of this creature’s sack-like body as seen in section under the microscope: @ and Db being the outer and inner cellular layers; while in the central space between them, is that nucleated substance, or sarcode, or protoplasm, in which the cells originate. But this lowly-organized THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 83 tissue of the Hydra, illustrates a phase of integration in which the lives of the minor aggregates are only par- tially-subordinated to the life of the major aggregate formed by them. For a Hydra’s substance is separable into Ameba-like portions, capable of moving about independ- ently. Prof. Green quotes Ecker, Lewes, and Jiiger, in proof that “this animal exhibits, at certain seasons of the year, a tendency to break up into particles of a sarcode aspect, which retain for a long time an independent vitality.” And if we bear in mind how analogous are the extreme extensibility and contractility of a Hydra’s body and tentacles, to the pro- perties displayed by the sarcode among Rhizopods; we may infer that probably the movements and other actions of a Hydra, are due to the half-independent co-operation of the Ameba-like individuals composing it. § 202. A truth which we before saw among plants, we here see repeated among animals—the truth that as soon as the integration of aggregates of the first order into aggregates of the second order, produces compound wholes so specific in their shapes and sizes, and so mutually dependent in their parts, as to have distinct individualities ; there simultaneously arises the tendency in them to produce, by gemmation, other such aggregates of the second order. The approach towards definite limitation in an organism, is, by implication, an ap- proach towards a state in which growth passing a certain point, results, not in the increase of the old individual, but in the formation of a new indi- vidual. Thus it happens that the common polype bude out other polypes, some of which very shortly do the like, as shown in Fig. 148: a process paral- .eled by the fronds of sundry Algc, and by those of the lower Jungermanniacee. And Just as, among these last plants, the b4 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. proliferously-produced fronds, after growing to certain sizes and developing rootlets, detach themselves from their parent- fronds; so among these animals, separation of the young ones from the bodies of their parents, ensues when they have acquired tolerably complete organizations. There is reason to think that the parallel holds still fur- ther. Within the limits of the Jungermanniacee, we found that while some genera exhibit this discontinuous develop- ment, other genera exhibit a development that is similar to it in all essential respects, save that it is continuous. And here within the limits of the Hydrozoa, we find, along with this genus in whick the gemmiparous individuals are pre- sently cast off, other genera in which they are not cast off, but form a permanent aggregate of the third order. Figs. 149 and 150, exemplify these compound Hydrozoa—one of them showing this mode of growth so carried out as to produce a single axis; and the other showing how, by repetitions of the process, lateral axes are produced. Integrations character- izing certain higher genera of the Hydrozoa, which swim or float instead of being fixed, are indicated by Figs. 151 and 152: the first of them representing the type of a group in which the polypes growing from an axis, or ceenosare, are drawn through the water by the rhythmical contractions of the organs from which they hang ; and the second of them representing a Physalia the component’ polypes of which are united into a cluster, attached to an air-vessel. It should be added that in the Rhizostomes, the integration is carried so far, that the individualities of the polypes are al- most lost in that of the aggregate they form. A parallel series of illustrations might be drawn from that second di- ye 7 THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 85 Se vision of the Calenterata, known as the Actinozoa. Here, too, we have a group of species—the Sea-anemonies—the individ- uals of which are solitary. Here, too, we have agamogenetic multiplication: occasionally by gemmation, but more fre- quently by that modified process called spontaneous fission. And here, too, we have compound forms resulting from the arrest of this spontaneous fission before it is complete. To give examples is needless; since they would but show, in more varied ways, the truth already made sufficiently clear, that the compound Celenterata are aggregates of the third order, produced by integration of aggregates of the second order such as we have in the Hydra. As before, it is manifest that on the hypothesis of evolution, these higher in- tegrations will insensibly arise, if the separation of the gem- miparous polypes is longer and longer postponed ; and that an increasing postponement will result by survival of the fittest, if it profits the group of individuals to remain united instead of dispersing. § 203. The lke relations exist, and imply that the like processes have been gone through, among those more highly- organized animals called Molluscoida. We have solitary individuals, and we have variously-integrated groups of indi- viduals: the chief difference between the evidence here fur- nished, and that furnished in the last case, being the absence of a type obviously linking the solitary state with the aggre- gated state. Itis now an accepted belief that the creatures named Brachi- opoda, very abundant in the so-called palzeozoic times, but at present comparatively rare, are akin in structure to the Polyzoa ; widely as they differ from them in size. If we can: not fairly say that by union of many Brachiopods there would be produced a compound animal like a Polyzoon; yet we may fairly say that were a small imperfectly-developed Brachiopod united with others like itself, a Polyzoon would result. This in- tegration of aggregates of the second order, is carried on among 86 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. vee the Polyzoa in divers ways, and with different degrees of com- pleteness. Thelittle patches of minute cells, shown as magnified in Fig. 153, so common on the fronds of sea-weeds and the surfaces of rocks at low-water mark, display little beyond me- chanical combination. The adjacent individuals, though sever- ally originated by gemmation from the same germ, have but little physiological dependence. In kindred kinds, however, as shown in Figs. 154 and 155, one of which is a magnified portion of the other, the integration is somewhat greater: the co-operation of the united individuals being shown in the production of those tubular branches which form their common support, and establish among them a more decided community of nutrition. Among the Ascidians, another order of the Molluscoida, this general law of morphological composition is once more dis- played. Each of these creatures subsists on the nutritive particles contained in the water which it draws in through one orifice and sends out through another ; and it may thus subsist either alone, or in connexion with others that are in some cases loosely aggregated and in other cases closely ageregated. Fig. 156, Phallusia mentula, is one of the soli- SEF LSE tary forms. A type in which the individuals are united by a stolon that gives origin to them by successive buds, is shown in Percphora, Fig. 157. Among the Botryllide, of which one THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 87 kind is drawn ona small scale in Fig. 159, and a portion of the same on a larger scale in Fig. 158, there is a combination of the individuals into annular clusters, which are themselves imbedded in a common gelatinous matrix. And in this group there are integrations even a stage higher, in which several such clusters of clusters grow from a single base. Here the compounding and re-compounding, appears to be carried further than anywhere else in the animal kingdom. Thus far, however, among these aggregates of the third order, we see what we before saw among the simpler aggre- gates of the second order—we see that the component indi- vidualities are but to a very small extent subordinated to the individuality made up of them. In nearly all the forms in- dicated, the. mutual dependence of the united animals is so slight, that they are more fitly comparable to societies, of which the members co-operate in securing certain common benefits. There is scarcely any specialization of functions among them. Only in the last type described do we see a number of individuals so completely combined as to simulate a single individual. And even here, though there appears to be an intimate community of nutrition, there is no physio- logical integration beyond that implied in several mouths and stomachs having a common vent. § 204. We come now to an extremely interesting ques- tion. Does there exist in other sub-kingdoms composition of the third degree, analogous to that which we have found so prevalent among the Ce/enterata and the Molluscoida ? The question is not whether elsewhere there are tertiary aggregates produced by the branching or clustering of secondary aggre- gates, in ways like those above traced ; but whether elsewhere there are ageregates which, though otherwise unlike in the arrangement of their parts, nevertheless consist of parts sc similar to one another that we may suspect them to be united secondary aggregates. The various compound types 88 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. above described, in which the united animals maintain their individualities so distinctly that the individuality of the agoregate remains vague, are constructed in such ways that the united animals carry on their several activities with scarcely any mutual hindrance. The members of a branched Hydrozoon such as is shown in Fig. 149 or Fig. 150, are so placed that they can all spread their tentacles and catch their prey as well as though separately attached to stones or weeds. Packed side by side on a flat surface or forming a tree- like assemblage, the associated individuals among the Polyzoa are not unequally conditioned; or if one has some advantage over another in a particular case, the mode of growth and the relations to surrounding objects are so irregular as to prevent this advantage re-appearing with constancy in suc- cessive generations. Similarly with the Ascidians growing from a stolon or those forming an annular cluster: each of them is as well placed as every other for drawing in the currents of sea-water from which it selects its food. Jn these cases the mode of aggregation does not expose the united individuals to multiform circumstances; and there- fore is not calculated to produce among them any structural multiformity. For the same reason no marked physiologi- cal division of labour arises among them; and consequently no combination close enough to disguise their several indi- vidualities. But under converse conditions we may expect converse results. If there isa mode of integration which necessarily subjects the united individuals to unlike sets of incident forces, and does this with complete uniformity from generation to generation, it is to be inferred that the united individuals will become unlike. They will severally assume such different functions as their different positions enable them respectively to carry on with the greatest advantage to the assemblage. This heterogeneity of function arising among them, will be followed by heterogeneity of structure ; as also by that closer combination which the better enables them to utilize one another’s functions. And hence, while THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 89 the oxiginally-like individuals are rendered unlike, they will have their homologies further obscured by their progressing fusion into an aggregate individual of a higher order. These converse conditions are in nearly all cases fulfilled where the successive individuals arising by continuous devel- opment are so budded-off as to form a linear series. I say in nearly all cases, because there are some types in which the associated individuals, though joined in single file, are not thereby rendered very unlike in their relations to the environment; and therefore do not become differentiated and interrated to any considerable extent. I refer to such Asci- dian3 as the Salpide. ‘These creatures float passively in the sea, attached together in strings. Being placed side by side and having mouths and vents that open laterally, each of them is as well circumstanced as its neighbours for absorb- ing and emitting the surrounding water; nor have the in- dividuals at the two extremities any marked advantages over the rest in these respects. Hence in this type, and in the allied type Pyrosoma, which has its component indivi- duals built into a hollow cylinder, linear aggregation may exist without the minor individualities becoming obscured and the major individuality marked: the conditions under which a differentiation and integration of the component individuals may be expected, are not fulfilled. But where the chain of individuals produced by gemmation, is either habitually fixed to some solid body by one of its extremities or moves actively through the water or over submerged stones and weeds, the several members of the chain become differently conditioned in the way anvove described ; and may therefore be expected to become unlike while they become united. A clear idea of the contrast between these tw> linear arrangements and their two diverse results, will be obtained by considering what happens to a row of soldiers, when changed from the ordinary position of a single rank to the position of Indian file. So long as the men stand shoulder to shoulder, they are severally able to use their 50° MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. weapons in like ways with like efficiency; and could, if called on, similarly perform various manual processes directly or indirectly conducive to their welfare. But when on the word of command “right face,” they so place themselves that each has one of his neighbours before him and another behind him, nearly all of them become incapacitated for fighting and for many other actions. They can walk or run one after another, so as to produce movement of the file in the direction of its length; but.if the file has to oppose an enemy or remove an obstacle lying in the line of its march, the front man is the only one able to use his weapons or hands to much purpose. And manifestly such an arrange- ment could become advantageous only if the front man pos- sessed powers peculiarly adapted to his position, while those behind him facilitated his actions by carrying supplies, &c. This simile, grotesque as it seems, serves to convey better perhaps than any other could do, a clear idea of the relations that must arise in a chain of individuals arismg by gemma- tion, and continuing permanently united end to end. Such a chain can arise by natural selection, only on condition that combination is more advantageous than separation ; and for it to be more advantageous, the anterior members of the series must become adapted to functions facilitated by their posi- tions, while the posterior members become adapted to func- tions which their positions permit. Hence, survival of the fittest must tend continually to establish types in which the connected individuals are more unlike one another, at the same time that their several individualities are more dis- guised by the integration consequent on their mutual dependence. Such being the anticipations warranted by the general laws of evolution, we have now to inquire whether the-e are any animals which fulfil them. Very little search suffices ; for structures of the kind to be expected are abund- ant. In that great division of the animal kingdom called Annulosa, especially if the Annuloida be regarded as part of THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 91 it, we find a variety of types having the looked-for charac; ters. Let us contemplate some of them. § 205. An adult Annelid is composed of segments which repeat one another in their details as well as in their general shapes. Dissecting one of the lower orders, such as is shown in Fig. 160, proves that the successive segments, be- iN i YAY (a ein G3) ( pe Ost M Sa \ \ (Pp D Ay } YW \ ees == SN" CEE D BU WS KP PPP OUY Y \ v v or 7 sxfes having like locomotive appendages, like branchize, and sometimes even like pairs of eyes, also have like internal organs. Each has its enlargement of the alimentary canal ; each its contractile dilatation of the great blood-vessel; each its portion of the double nervous cord, with ganglia when these exist; each its branches from the nervous and vascular trunks answering to those of its neighbours; each its simi- larly answering set of muscles; each its pair of openings through the body-wall; and so on throughout, even to the organs of reproduction. That is to say, every segment is in great measure a physiological whole—every segment con- tains most of the organs essential to individual life and mul- tiplication: such essential organs as it does not contain, being those which its position as one in the midst of a chain, prevents it from having or needing. If we ask what is the meaning of these homologies, no adequate answer is supplied by any current hypothesis. That this “vegetative repetition” is carried out to fulfil a prede- termined plan, was shown to be quite an untenable notion (§§ 183, 184). On the one hand, we found nothing satis- factory in the conception of a Creator who prescribed to him- 92 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. self a certain unit of composition for all creatures of a par- ticular class, and then displayed his ingenuity in building up a great variety of forms without departing from the “ arche- typal idea.”’ On the other hand, examination made it mani- fest that even were such a conception worthy of being enter- tained, it would have to be relinquished ; since in each class there are numerous deviations from the supposed ‘‘ archetypal idea.”’ Still less can these traits of structure be accounted for teleologically. That certain organs of nutrition and re- spiration and locomotion are repeated in each segment of a dorsibranchiate annelid, may be regarded as functionally ad- vantageous for a creature following its mode of life. But why should there be a hundred or even two hundred pairs of ovaries? This is an arrangement at variance with that physiological division of labour which every organism pro- fits by—is a less advantageous arrangement than might have been adopted. That is to say, the hypothesis of a designed adaptation fails to explain the facts. Contrariwise, these structural traits are just such as might naturally be looked for, if these annulose forms have arisen by the in- tegration of simpler forms. Among the various compound animals already glanced at, it is very general for the united individuals to repeat one another in all their parts—repro- ductive organs included. Hence if, instead cf a clustered or branched integration, such as the Coelenterata and Molluscoida exhibit, there occurs a longitudinal integration; we may ex- pect that the united individuals will habitually indicate their original independence by severally bearing germ-producing or sperm-producing organs. The reasons for believing one of these creatures to be an aggregate of the third order, are greatly strengthened when we turn from the adult structure to the mode of develop- ment. Among the Dorsibranchiata and Tubicole, the em- bryo leaves the egg in the shape of a ciliated gemmutle, not much more differentiated than that of a polype. As shown in Fig. 162, it is a nearly globular mass; and its interior THE MORPHULOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 93 consists of untransformed cells. The first appreciable change is an elongation and a simultaneous commencement of seg- mentation. The segments multiply by a modified gemma- tion, which takes place from the hinder-end of the penultimate segment. And considerable progress in marking-out these divisions is made before the internal organization begins. Figs. 163, 164, 165, represent some of these aly stages. In l eri! A Seat (4 Ml A (\\p My 452 a 463 165 Annelids of other orders, the embryo assumes the segmented form while still in the egg. But it does this in just the same manner as before. Indeed, the essential identity of the two modes of development is shown by the fact that the seg- mentation within the egg is only partially carried out: in all these types the segments continue to increase in number for some time after birth. Now this process is as like that by which compound animals in general are formed, as the different conditions of the case permit. When new individuals are budded-out laterally, their unfolding is not hirdered-—there is nothing to disguise either the process or the product. But gemmez produced one from another in the same straight line, and remaining connected, restrict one another’s developments; and that the resulting segments are so many gemmiparously-produced individuals, is necessarily less obvious. § 206. Evidence remains which adds very greatly to the weight of that already assigned. Thus far we have studied only the individual annulose animal; considering what may be inferred from its mode of evolution and final organization. 94 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. We have now to study annulose animals in general. Com- parison of them will disclose various phases of progressive integration of the kind to be anticipated. Among the simpler Annuloida, as in the Nemertide and in some kinds of P/anaria, transverse fission occurs. A por- tion of a Planaria separated by spontaneous constriction, becomes an independent individual. Sir J.G. Dalyell found that in some cases numerous fragments artificially separated, grew into perfect animals. In these annuloids which thus remind us of the lowest Hydrozoa in their powers of agamo- genetic multiplication, the individuals produced one from another, do not continue connected. As the young ones laterally budded-otf by the Hydra separate when complete, so do the young ones longitudinally budded-off by the Pia- naria. Fig. 166 indicates this. But there are allied types which show us a more or less persistent union of homologous parts, or individuals, similarly arising by longitudinal gem- mation. The cestoid Hnfozoa furnish illustrations. Without dwelling on the fact that each segment of a Tenza, like each separate Planaria, is an independent hermaphrodite, or on the fact that both develop their ova by the peculiar method of forming germinal vesicles in one canal and surrounding them with yelk that is secreted in another canal; and without specifying the sundry common structural traits which add probability to the suspicion that there is some kinship be- tween the individuals of the one order and the segments of the other; it will suffice to point out that the two types are so far allied as to demand their union under the same sub- class title. And recognizing this kinship, we see significance in the fact that in the one case the longitudinally-produced gemmie separate as complete individuals, and in the other continue united as segments in smaller or larger numbers and for shorter or longer periods. In Tenia echanococcus, represented in Fig. 167, we have a species in which the number of segments thus united does not exceed four. In Echinobothrium typus there are eight or ten ; and in cestoids _ THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 95 generally they are numerous.* A considerable hiatus occurs between this phase of integration and the next higher phase which we meet with; but it is not greater than the hiatus between the types of the Annuloida and the Annelida, which present the two phases. Though it is doubtful whether separation of single segments occurs among the Annelida, yet very often we find strings of segments, arising by repeated longitudinal budding, which after reach- ing certain lengths undergo spontaneous fission: in some eases doing this so as to form two or more similar strings of segments constituting independent individuals; and in other cases doing it so that the segments spontaneously separated are but a small part of the string. Thus a Syllis, Fig. 168, after reaching a certain length, begins to trans. form itself into two individuals. one of the posterior seg. ments develops into a head, and simultaneously narrows its connexion with the preceding segments, from which it * | find that the reasons for regarding the segment of a Tenia as answering to an individual of the second order of aggregation, are much stronger than I sup- posed when writing the above. Van Beneden says:—‘ Le Proglottis (segment) ayant acquis tout son développement, se détache ordinairement de la colonie et continue encore & croitre dans l’intestin du méme animal; il change méme sou- vent de forme et semble doué d’une nouvelle vie ; ses angles s’effacent, tout le corps s’arrondit, et il nage comme une Planaire au milieu des nuscosités intestinales.’ 39 96 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. eventually separates. Still more remarkable is the extent to which this process is carried in certain kindred types; which exhibit to us several individuals thus being simultaneously formed out of groups of segments. Fig. 169, copied (omit- ting the appendages) from one contained in a memoir by M. Milne-Edwards, represents six worms of different aves in course of development: the terminal one peing the eldest, the one having the greatest number of segments, and the one that will first detach itself; and the success- ively anterior ones, with their successively smaller numbers of segments, being successively less advanced towards fitness for separation and independence. Here among groups of segments we see repeated what in the previous cases occurs with single segments. And then in other Annelids we find that the string of segments arising by gemmation from a single germ becomes a permanently united whole: the tendency to any more complete fission than that which marks out the seg- ments, being lost; or,in other words, the integration haying become relatively complete. Leaving out of sight the question of alliance among the types above grouped together, that which it here concerns us to notice is, that longitudinal gemmation does go on; that it is displayed in that primitive form in which the gemme separate as soon as produced ; that we have types in which such gemme hang together in eroups of four, or in groups of eight and ten, from which however the gcmmz successively separate as individuals; that among higher types we have long strings of similarly- formed gemme which do not become individually independ- ent, but separate into organized groups; and that from these we advance to forms in which all the gemme remain parts of a single individual. One other significant class of facts must be added. A few cases have been pointed out, one of them quite recently, in which Annelids mul- tiply by lateral gemmation. M. Pagenstecher alleges this of the Exogone gemmifera: describing a certain number of the segments of the body as severally bearing on their dorsal THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 97 surfaces a bud on each side. And M. L. Vaillant, after citing this observation of M. Pagenstecher, gives an account of a species of Sy//is in which a great number of buds were borne by asinglesegment. That the longitudinally-produced gemmz which compose an Annelid, should thus have, one of them or several of them, the power of laterally budding-off gemme, from which no doubt other annelids arise, gives fur- ther support to the hypothesis that, primordially, the seg- ments were independent individuals. And it suggests this be- lief the more strongly because, in certain types of Celenterata, we see that longitudinal and lateral gemmation do occur to- gether, where the longitudinally-united gemme are demon- strably independent individuals. § 207. It would add to the probability of this conclusion could we identify the type out of which the annulose type may have arisen by the process of integration. I believe there may be poiited out such a type—a type which, by a slight modification carrying somewhat further an habitual mode of development, would produce not only a unit of com- position for the annulose type, but also as a bond uniting it with the other types, and these with one another. It is un- desirable, however, here to enter upon the numerous explan- ations involved by opening the question of these relation- ships; both because it would necessitate a long digression, encumbering too much the general argument, and because, being highly speculative, it would be impolitic to let the general argument be even apparently implicated by it. But even supposing it impossible now to identify the unit of composition of the annulose type, the foregoing evidence still goes far towards showing that an annulose animal is an aggre- gate of the third order. This repetition of segments, some- times numbering several hundreds, like one another in all their organs even down to those of reproduction, while it is otherwise unaccountable, is fully accounted for if these seg- ments are homologous with the separate individuals of some 98 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. lower type. The gemmation by which these segments are pro- duced, is as similar as the conditions allow, to the gemmation by which compound animals in general are produced. As among plants and as among demonstrably-compound animals, we see that the only thing required for the formation of a per- manent chain of gemmiparously-produced individuals, is that by remaining associated, such individuals will have advantages greater than are to be gained by separation. Further, by comparison of the annuloid and lower annulose forms, we discover a number of those transitional phases of integration which the hypothesis leads us to expect. And, lastly, the differences among these united individuals or successive segments, are not greater than the differences in their posi- tions and functions explain—not greater than such differences are known to produce among other united individuals: wit- ness sundry compound Hydrozoa. Indirect evidence of much weight has still to be given. Thus far we have considered only the less-developed Annu- Josa. ‘The more integrated and more differentiated types of the class remain. If in them we find a carrying further of the processes by which the lower types are here supposed to have been evolved, we shall have additional reason for be- lieving them to have been so evolved. If we find that in these superior orders the individualities of the united seg- ments are much less pronounced than in the inferior, we shall have grounds for suspecting that in the inferior the individualities of the segments are less pronounced than in those lost forms which initiated the annulose sub-kingdom CHAPTER V. THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS, CONTINUED. § 208. Insrcts, Arachnids, Crustaceans, and Myriapods, are all members of that higher division of the Annulosa called Articulata or Arthropoda. Though in these creatures the formation of segments may be interpreted as a disguised gemmation ; and though in some of them the number of seg- ments increases by this modified budding after leaving the ege, as among the higher Annelids; yet the process is not nearly so dominant: the segments are usually much less numerous than we find them in the types last considered. In most cases, too, the segments are in a greater dezree dif- ferentiated one from another, at the same time that they are severally more differentiated within themselves. Nor is there any instance of spontaneous fission taking place in the series of segments composing an articulate animal. On the contrary, the integration, always great enough permanently to unite the segments, is frequently carried so far as to hide very completely the individualities of some or many of them ; and occasionally, as among the Acari, the consolidation, or the arrest of segmentation, is so decided as to leave scarcely a trace of the articulate structure: the type being in these cases indicated chiefly by the presence of those character- istically-formed limbs, ‘which give the alternative name Arthropoda to all the higher Annulosa. Omitting the para- sitic orders, which, as in other cases, are aberrant members of 100 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. their sub-kingdom, comparisons between the different orders prove that the higher are strongly distinguished from the lower, by the much greater degree in which the individual- ity of the tertiary aggregate dominates over the individual- ities of those secondary aggregates called segments or “ somites,” of which it is composed. The successive Figs. 170—176, representing (without their limbs) a Julus, a 173 Scolopendra, an isopodous Crustacean, and four kinds of decapodous Crustaceans, ending with a Crab, will convey at a glance an idea of the way in which that greater size and heterogeneity reached by the higher types, is accompanied by an integration which, in the extreme cases, almost obliter- ates all traces of composite structure. In the Crab the posterior segments, usually folded underneath the shell, alone preserve their primitive distinctness: so completely confluent are the rest, that it seems absurd to say that a Crab’s carapace is composed of as many segments as there are pairs of limbs, foot-jaws, and antenne attached to it; and were it not that during early stages of the Crab’s develop- ment the segmentation is faintly marked, the assertion might be considered illegitimate. That all articulate animals are thus composed from end to end of homologous segments, is, however, an accepted doc- trine among naturalists. It is a doctrine that rests on care- THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 101 ful observation of three classes of facts—the correspondences of parts in the successive ‘‘somites”’ of an adult articulate animal; the still more marked correspondences of such parts as they exist in the embryonic or larval articulate ani- mal; and the maintenance of such correspondences in some types, which are absent in types otherwise near akin to them. The nature of the conclusion which these evidences unite in supporting, will best be shown by the annexed copies from the lecture-diagrams of Prof. Huxley; exhibiting the typical structures of a Myriapod, an Insect, a Spider, and a Crustacean, with their relations to a common plan, as in- terpreted by him. Mnsetl Shider 179 Y= 1S) UDIIMDJSIAMD SS SS Head Thorax Abdomen aN 182 Aunelide LOE 26 Treating of these homologies, Prof. Huxley says “that a striking uniformity of composition is to be found in the heads of, at any rate, the more highly organized members of these four classes, and that, typically, the head of a Crustacean, an Arachnid, a Myriapod, or an Insect, is composed of six somites (or segments corresponding with those of the body) and their appendages, the latter being modified so as to serve the purpose of sensory and manducatory organs.” And omitting the Myriapods, he also finds among these groups the further unity that in most of them the entire animal contains twenty of these homologous segments. 102 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. Thus even in the higher Annu/osa, the much greater const. lidation and much greater heterogeneity do not obliterate the evidence of the fact, that the organism is an aggregate of the third order. Beyond all question it is divisible into a number of proximate units, each of which has essentially the same structure as its neighbours, and each of which is an agoregate of the second order, in so far as it is an organized combination of those aggregates of the first order which we call morphological units or cells. And that these segments or somites, which make up an annulose animal, were origin- ally aggregates of the second order having independent in- dividualities, is an hypothesis which gathers further support from the contrast between the higher and the lower articu- late types, as well as from the contrast between the Articu- lata in general and the inferior Annulosa. For if that masking of the individualities of the segments which we find distinguishes the higher forms from the lower, has been going on from the beginning, as we may fairly assume ; it is to be inferred that the individualities of the segments in the lower forms, were originally more marked than they now are. Reversing those processes of change by which the most developed Annulosa have arisen from the least developed ; ard applying in thought this reversed process to the least developed, as they were described in the last Chapter; we are brought to the conception of attached segments that are completely alike, and have their individualities in no ap- preciable degree subordinated to that of the chain they com- pose. From which there is but a step to the conception of gemmiparously-produced individuals which severally part one from another as soon as they are formed. § 209. We must now return to a point whence we di- verged some time ago. As before explained under the head of Classification, organisms do not admit of uni-serial ar- rangement, either in general or in detail; but everywhere form groups within groups. Hence, having traced the THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 103 phases of morphological composition up to the highest forms in any sub-kingdom, we find ourselves at the extremity of a ereat branch, from which there is no access to another great branch, except by going back to some place of bifurcation low down in the tree. The nearest relatives of the Mollusca are these molluscoid forms treated of early in the last Chapter. A Brachiopod or a solitary Ascidian, though widely unlike a Mussel or a Snail or a Cuttle-fish, is nearer akin to them than is any celenterate animal or annulose animal or vertebrate animal. One of the leading distinctions, however, between the Mol- luscoida and the Mollusca, considered as groups, is that whereas the Jfolluscoida are very frequently, or indeed generally, compound, the Mollusca are invariably single. No true Mollusk multiplies by gemmation, either continuous or discontinuous ; but the product of every fertilized germ is a single individual. It is a significant fact that here, where for the first time we have homogenesis holding throughout an entire sub- kingdom, we have also throughout an entire sub-king- dom no case in which the organism is divisible into two, three, or more, like parts. There is neither any such clustering or branching as a celenterate or molluscoid ani- mal usually displays; nor is there any trace of that seg- mentation which characterizes the Annulosa. Among these animals in which no single egg produces several individuals, no individual is separable into several homologous divisions. This connexion will be seen to have a probable meaning, on remembering that it is the converse of the connexion which obtains among the Annulosa, considered as a group. A Mollusk, then, is an aggregate of the second order. Not only in the adult animal is there no sign of a multiplicity of like parts that have become obscured by integration; but there is no sign of such multiplicity in the embryo. And this unity is just as conspicuous in the lowest Lamelli- branch as in the highest Cephalopod. 104 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. It may be well to note, however, more especially because it illustrates a danger of misinterpretation presently to be guarded against, that there are certain Mollusks which si- mulate the segmented structure. Externally a Chiton, Fig. 188, appears to be made up of divisions substantially like those of the creature Fig 189; and one who judged only by externals, would say that the creature Fig. 190 differs as much from the creature Fig. 189, as this does from the preceding one. But the truth is, that while 190 and 189 are closely-allied types, 189 differs from 188 much more widely than a man does froma fish. And the radical distinction between them is this; that whereas in the Crustacean the segmentation is carried transversely through the whole mass of the body, so as to render the body more or less clearly divisible into a series of parts that are similarly composed ; in the Mollusk the segmentation is limited to the shell which it carries on its upper surface, and leaves its body as completely undivided as is that of a common slug. Vere the body cut through at each of the divisions, the sec- ton of it attached to each portion of the shell would be unlike all the other sections. Here the segmentation has a purely functional derivation—is adaptive instead of genetic. The similarly-formed and similarly-placed parts, are not homolo- gous in the same sense as are the appendages of a pheenoga- mic axis or the limbs of an insect. § 210. In studying the remaining and highest sub-king- dom of animals, it is important to recognize this radical dif- ference In meaning between that likeness of parts which is produced by likeness of modifying forces, and that likeness of parts which is due to primordial identity of origin. On our recognition of this difference depends the view we take THE MORI HULOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 105 of certain doctrines that have long been dominant, and have still a wide cvrrency. Among the Vertebrata, as among the Mollusca, homogenesis is universa]. The two sub-kingdoms are like one another and unlike the remaining sub-kingdoms in this, that in all the types they severally include, a single fertilized ovum _produces only a single individual. It is true that as the eggs of certain Gasteropods occasionally exhibit spontaneous hssion of the vitelline mass, which may or may not result in the furmation of two individuals; so among vertebrate ani- mals we now and then meet with double monsters, which appear to imply such a spontaneous fission imperfectly car- ried out. But these anomalies serve to render conspicu- ous the fact, that in both these sub-kingdoms the normal process is the integration of the whole germ-mass into a single organism, which at no phase of its development dis- plays any tendency to separate into two or more parts. Equally as throughout the Mollusca there holds throughout the Vertebrata, the correlative fact, that not even in its lowest any more than in its highest types, is the body divisible into homologous segments. The vertebrate animal, under its simplest as under its most complex form, is like the mollusc- ous animal in this, that you cannot cut it into transverse slices, each of which contains a digestive organ, a respiratory organ, a reproductive organ, &c. The organs of the least- developed fish as well as those of the most-developed mammal, form but a single physiological whole; and they show not the remotest trace of having ever been divisible mto two or more physiological wholes. That segmentation which the vertebrate animal usually exhibits throughout part of its organization, is the same in origin and meaning as the segmentation of a Chiton’s shell ; and no more implies in the vertebrate animal a composite structure, than do the successive pairs of branchiz of the Dofo or the transverse rows of branchiz in the Holis, imply composite structure in the molluscous animal. To some this will seem a very question- 106 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. able proposition ; and had we no evidence beyond that which adult vertebrate animals of developed types supply, it would be a proposition not easy to substantiate. But abundant support for it is to be found in the structure of the vertebrate embryo, and in the comparative morphology of the Vertebrata in general. Embryologists teach us that the primordial relations of parts are most clearly displayed in the early stages of evo- lution; and that they generally become partially or com- pletely disguised in its later stages. Hence, were the verte- brate animal on the same level as the annulose animal in degree of composition—did it similarly consist of segments which are homologous in the sense that they are the prox- unate units of composition; we ought to find this funda- mental fact most strongly marked at the outset. As in the annelid-embryo, the first conspicuous change is the elongation and division into segments, by constrictions that encircle the whole body; and as in the articulate embryo, the blastoderm becomes marked out transversely into pieces which extend themselves round the yelk before the internal organization has made any appreciable progress ; so in the embryo of every vertebrate animal, had it an analogous com- position, the first decided change should be a’ segmentation implicating the entire mass. But it is not so. Sundry im- portant differentiations occur before any divisions begin to show themselves. There is the defining of that elongated, elevated area with its longitudinal groove, which becomes the seat of subsequent changes; there is the formation of the notochord lying beneath this groove; there is the growth upwards of the boundaries of the groove into the dorsal Jamin, which rapidly develop and fold over in the region of the head. Rathke, as quoted and indorsed by Prof. Huxley, describes the subsequent changes as follows :—“ The gelatin- ous investing mass, which, at first, seems only to constitute a band to the right and to the left of the notochord, forms around it, in the further course of development, a sheath, THE MORPHULOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS. 107 which ends in a point posteriorly. Anteriorly, it sends out two processes which underlie the lateral parts of the skull, but very soon coalesce for a longer or shorter distance. Pos- teriorly, the sheath projects but little beyond the notochord ; but, anteriorly, for a considerable distance, as far-as the in- fundibulum. It sends upwards two plates, which embrace the future central parts of the nervous system laterally, pro- bably throughout their entire length.” All this precedes segmentation. Considered under its broadest aspects, the process is directly opposed to the process among the An- suosa. Whereas among the Annu/osa the first step is the resolution of the germ-mass or of the blastoderm into seg- ments, which may or may not afterwards become inte- grated; in the Vertebrata the first step is the marking out on the blastoderm of an integrated structure within which segments subsequently appear. When these do ap- pear, they are for some time limited to the middle region of the spinal axis; and no more then than ever after, do they implicate the general mass of the body in their transverse di- visions. On the contrary, before segmentation has made much progress the rudiments of the vascular system are laid down in a manner showing not the remotest trace of any primordial correspondence of its parts with the divisions of the axls. No less at variance with the belief that the vertebrate animal is essentially a series of homologous parts, is the heterogeneity which exists among these parts on their first appearance. Though in the head of an adult articulate animal there is little sign of divisibility into segments like those of the body ; yet such segments, with their appropriate gangha and appendages, are easily identifiable in the articu- late embryo. But in the vertebrata this antithesis is exactly reversed. At the time when segmentation has become de- cided in the dorsal region of the spine, there is no trace of segments in the parts that are to form the skull—nothing whatever to suggest that the skull is being formed out of hivisions homologous with yertebre. And minute observa- L08 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. tion no more discloses any such homology than does general appearance. ‘ Remak,” says Prof. Huxley, “has more fully proved than any other observer, the segmentation into ‘ur- wirbel,’ or proto-vertebre, which is characteristic of the ver- tebral column, stops at the occipital margin of the skull— the base of which, before ossification, presents no trace of that segmentation which occurs throughout the vertebral column.” Consider next the evidence supplied by comparative mor- phology. In preceding sections (§§ 206, 208,) it has been shown that among annulose animals, the divisibility into homologous parts is most clearly demonstrable in the lowest types. Though in decapodous Crustaceans, in Insects, in Arachnids, there is difficulty in identifying some or many of the component somites; and though when identified they display only partial correspondences; yet on descending to Annelids, the composition of the entire body out of such somites becomes conspicuous, and the homology between each somite and its neighbours is shown by the repetition of one another’s structural details, as well as by their common gemmiparous origin: indeed, in some cases we have the homology directly demonstrated by seeing a somite of the body transformed into ahead. If, then, a vertebrate animal had a segmental composition of kindred nature, we ought to find it most clearly marked in the lowest Vertebrata, and most disguised in the highest Vertebrata. But here, as be- fore, the fact is just the reverse. Among the Vertebrata ot developed type, such segmentation as really exists remains conspicuous—is but little obscured even in parts of the spinal column formed out of integrated vertebrae. Whereas in the undeveloped vertebrate type, segmentation is scarcely at all traceable. The Amphiorus, Fig. 191, is not only without ossified vertebre; not only is it without cartilaginous re- presentatives of them; but it is even without anything like distinct membranous divisions. The spinal column exists as a continuous notochord: the only signs of incipient segs THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS, [199 mentation being given by its membranous sheath, in the upper part of which “quadrate masses of somewhat denser tissue seem faintly to represent neural spines.” Moreover, throughout sundry groups of fishes and amphibians, the segmentation remains very imperfect: only certain peri- pheral appendages of the vertebrze becoming defined and solidified, while in place of the bodies of the vertebre there still continues the undivided notochord. Thus, instead of being morphologically composed of vertebral segments, the vertebrate animal in its primitive form is entirely without vertebral segments; and vertebral segments begin to appear only as we advance towards developed forms. Once more, evidence equally adverse to the current hypothesis meets us on observing that the differences between the parts supposed to be homologous, are as great at first as at last. Did the vertebrate animal primordially consist of homo- logous segments from snout to tail; then the segments said to compose the skull ought, in the lowest Vertebrata, to show themselves much more like the remaining segments than they do in the highest Vertebrata. But they do not. Fishes have crania made up of bones that are no more clearly arrangeable into segments like vertebre, than are the cranial bones of the highest mammal. Nay, indeed, the case is much stronger: the simplest fish possessing a skeleton, has a cranium composed of cartilage that is not segmented at all! Besides being inconsistent with the leading truths of Embryology and Comparative Morphology, the hypothe- sis of Goethe and Oken is inconsistent with itself. The facts brought forward to show that there exists an arche- 110 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. typal vertebra ; and that the vertebrate animal is composed of archetypal vertebrze arranged in a series, and seyer- ally modified to fit their positions—these facts, I say, so far from proving as much, suffice, when impartially considered, to disprove it. No assigned nor any conceivable attribute of the supposed archetypal vertebra is uniformly maintained. The parts composing it are constant neither in their num- ber, nor in their relative positions, nor in their modes of ossification, nor in the separateness of their several individu- alities when present. There is no fixity of any one element, or connexion, or mode of development, which justifies even a suspicion that vertebrae are modelled after an ideal pattern. To substantiate these assertions here would require too much space, and an amount of technical detail wearisome to the general reader. The warrant for them will be found in a criticism on the osteological works of Prof. Owen, originally published in the British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review for Oct. 1858. This criticism I add in the Appendix, for the convenience of those who may wish to study the question more fully. (See Appendix B.) Everything, then, goes to show that the segmental compo- sition which characterises the apparatus of external relation in most vertebrata, is not primordial or genetic, but function- ally determined or adaptive. Our inference must be that the vertebrate animal is an aggregate of the second order, in which a relatively superficial segmentation has been pro- duced by mechanical intercourse with the environment. We shall hereafter see that this conception leads us to a consist- ent interpretation of the facts—shows us why there has arisen such unity in variety as exists in every vertebral eolumn, and why this unity in variety is displayed under countless modifications in different skeletons. § 211. Glancing back at the facts brought together in these two chapters, it seems probable that there has gone on among animals a process parallel to that which we saw reason THE MORPHOLOGICAL COMPOSITION OF ANIMALS, 111 to think has gone on among plants. Minute aggregates of those physiological units which compose living protoplasm, exist as Protozoa: some of them incoherent, indefinite, and almost homogenous ; and others of them more coherent, de- finite, and heterogenous. By union of these nucléated parti- cles of sarcode, are produced various indefinite aggregates of the second order—Sponges, Thalassicolle, Foraminifers, &c. ; in which the compound individuality is scarcely enough marked to subordinate the primitive individualities. But in other types, as the Hydra, the lives of the morphological units are in a considerable degree, though not wholly, merged in the life of the integrated whole they form. As the primary ageregate when it passes a certain size undergoes fission or gemmation ; so does the secondary aggregate. And as on the lower stage so on the higher, we see cases in which the gemmiparously-produced individuals part as soon as formed, and other cases in which they continue united, though in great measure independent. This massing of secondary aggregates into tertiary aggregates, is variously carried on among the Hydrozoa, the Actinozoa, and the Molluscoida. In most of the types so produced, the component individualities are very little subordinated to the individuality of the mass they form —there is only physical unity and not physiological unity ; but in certain of the oceanic Hydrozoa, the individuals are so far differentiated and combined as very much to mask them. Forms showing us clearly the transition to well-developed individuals of the third order, are not to be found. Never- theless, in the great sub-kingdom Annulosa, there are traits of structure, development, and mode of multiplication, which go far to show that its members are such individuals of the third order; and in the relations to external conditions involved by the mcde of union, we find an adequate cause for that obscuration of the secondary individualities which we must suppose has taken place. The two other great sub- kingdoms Mollusca and Vertebrata, between the lower mem- bers of which there are suggestive points cf community, 40 112 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. present us only with aggregates of the second order, that have In many cases become very large and very complex. We find in them no trace of the union of gemmiparously- produced individuals. Neither the molluscous nor the vertebrate animal shows the faintest trace of a segmenta- tion affecting the totality of its structure; and we see good grounds for concluding that such segmentation as ex- ceptionally occurs in the one and usuaily occurs in the other, is superinduced, CHAPTER VI. MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN PLANTS. § 212. Wurtz in the course of their evolution plants and animals have displayed progressive integrations, there have at the same time been progressive differentiations of the resulting aggregates, both as wholes and in their parts. These differentiations and the interpretations of them, form ‘he second class of morphological problems. We commence as before with plants. We have to con- sider, first, the several kinds of modification in shape they have undergone; and, second, the relations between these kinds of modification and their factors. Let us glance at the leading questions that have to be answered. § 213. Irrespective of their degrees of composition, plants may, and do, become changed in their general forms. Are their changes capable of being formulated? The inquiry which meets us at the outset is—does a plant’s shape admit of being expressed in any universal terms ?—terms that remain the same for all genera, orders, and classes. After plants considered as wholes, have to be considered their proximate components, which vary with their degrees of composition, and in the highest plants are what we call branches. Is there any law traceable among the contrasted shapes of different branches in the same plant? Do the rela- tive developments of parts in the same branch conform to 114 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. any law? And are these laws, if they exist, allied with one another and with that to which the shape of the whole plant conforms ? Descending to the components of these components, which in developed plants we distinguish as leaves, there meet us kindred questions respecting their relative sizes, their rela- tive shapes, and their shapes as compared with those of foliar organs in general. Of their morphological differentia- tions, also, it has to be asked whether they exemplify any truth that is exemplified by the entire plant and by its larger parts. Then, a step lower, we come down to those morphological units of which leaves and fronds consist; and concerning these arise parallel inquiries touching their divergencies from one another and from cells in general. Tne problems thus put together in several groups can- not of course be rigorously separated. Evolution pre-sup- poses transitions which make all such classings more or less conventional ; and adherence to them must be subordinate to the needs of the occasion. § 214. In studying the causes of the morphological differentiations thus grouped and prospectively generalized, we shall have to bear in mind several orders of forces which it will be well briefly to specify. Growth tends inevitably to initiate changes in the shape of any aggregate, by changing both the amounts of the incident forces and the forces which the parts exert on one another. With the mechanical actions this is obvious: matter that is sensibly plastic cannot be increased in mass without undergoing a change in its proportions, consequent on the diminished ratio of its cohesive force to the force of gravitation. With the physiological actions it is equally obvious: increase of size, other things equal, alters the relations of the parts to the material and dynamical factors of nutrition; and by so affecting differently the nutrition MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN PLANTS. 115 of different parts, initiates further changes of propor- tions. Similarly in any composite plant, the proximate units as fast as they accumulate are subjected to mutual influences that are unlike one another and are continually changing. The earlier-formed units become mechanical supporters of the later-formed units, and so experience modifying forces from which the later-formed units are exempt. Further, these elder units simultaneously begin to serve as channels through which materials are carried to and from the younger units— another cause of differentiation that goes on increasing in in- tensity. Once more, there arise ever-strengthening contrasts between the amounts of light which fall upon the youngest or outermost units and the eldest or innermost units; whence result structural contrasts of yet another kind. Evidently, then, along with the progressive integration of cells into fronds, of fronds into axes, and of axes into plants still more composite, there come into play sundry causes of differen- tiation which act on the whole and on each of its parts, whatever their grade. The forces to be overcome, the forces to be utilized, and the matters to be appropriated, do not remain the same in their proportions and modes of action for any two members of the aggregate: be they members of the first, second, third, or any other order. § 215. Nor are these the only kinds and causes of hetero- geneity which we have to consider. Beyond the more general changes produced in the relative sizes and shapes of plants and their parts by progressive aggregation, there are the more particular changes determined by the more particu- lar conditions. Plants as wholes assume unlike attitudes towards their en- vironments; they have many ways of articulating their perts with one another; they have many ways of adjusting their parts towards surrounding agencies. These are causes of special differentiations additional to those general differentia. 116 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. tions that result from increase of mass and increase of com- position. In each part considered individually, there arises a characteristic shape consequent on that relative position towards external and internal forces, which the mode of growth entails. very member of the aggregate presents itselfin a more or less peculiar way towards the light, towards the air, and towards its point of support; and according to the relative homogeneity or heterogeneity in the incidence of the agencies thus brought to bear on it, will be the relative homogeneity or heterogeneity of its shape. § 216. Before passing from this @ priori view of the mor- phological differentiations which necessarily accompany morphological integrations, to an a posteriori view of them, it seems needful to specify the meanings of certain descriptive terms we shall have to employ. Taking for our broadest division among forms, the regular and the irregular, we may divide the latter into those which are wholly irregular and those which, being but partially irregular, suggest some regular form to which they approach. By slightly straining the difference between them, two current words may be conveniently used to describe these subdivi- sions. The entirely irregular forms we may class as asymmetrical—literally as forms without any equality of dimensions. The forms which approximate towards regu- larity without reaching it, we may distinguish as wnsym- metrical—a word which, though it asserts inequality of dimensions, has been associated by use rather with such slight inequality as constitutes an observable departure from equality. : Of the regular forms there are several claxses, differmg in the number of directions in which equality of dimensions is repeated. Hence results the need for names by which sym- metry of several kinds may be expressed. The most regular of figures is the sphere: its dimensions are the same from centre to surface in all directions; and i MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN PLANTS. TTY cut by any plane through the centre, the separated parts are equal and similar. This isa kind of symmetry which stands alone, and will be hereafter spoken of as spherical symmetry. When a sphere passes into a spheroid, either prolate or ob- late, there remains but one set of planes that will divide it into halves which are in all respects alike; namely, the planes in which its axis lies, or which have its axis for their line of intersection. Prolate and oblate spheroids may severally pass into various forms without losing this pro- perty. The prolate spheroid may become egg-shaped or py- riform, and it will still continue capable of being divided into two equal and similar parts by any plane cutting it down its axis; nor will forming constrictions round it deprive it of this property. Similarly with the oblate spheroid. The transition from a slight oblateness like that of an orange to an oblateness reducing it nearly to a flat disc, does not alter its divisibility into like halves by every plane passing through its axis. And clearly the moulding of any such flattened oblate spheroid into the shape of a plate, leaves it as before, symmetrically divisible by all planes at right angles to its surface and passing through its centre. Tlis species of symmetry is called radial symmetry. It is familiarly exemplified in such flowers as the daisy, the tulip, and the dahlia. From spherical symmetry, in which we have an infinite number of axes through each of which may pass an infinite number of planes severally dividing the aggregate into equal and similar parts; and from radial symmetry, in which we have a single axis through which may pass an infinite num- ber of planes severally dividing the aggregate into equal and similar parts; we now turn to bilateral symmewy, in which the divisibility into equal and similar parts becomes very limited. Noting, for the sake of completeness, that there is a sextuple bilateralness in the cube and its derivative forms, which admit of division into equal and similar parts by planes passing through the three diagonal axes and by planes passing 118 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. through the three axes that join the centres of the surfaces, let us limit our attention to the three kinds of bilateralness which here concern us. The first of these 1s triple bilateral symmetry. This is the symmetry of a figure having three axes at right angles to one another, through each of which there passes a single plane that divides the aggregate into corresponding halves. A common brick will serve as an example; and of objects not quite so simple, the most familiar is that modern kind of spectacle-case which is open at both ends. This may be divided into corresponding halves along its longitudinal axis, by cutting it through in the direction of its thickness or by cutting it through in the direction of its breadth ; or it may be divided into corresponding halves by cutting it across the middle. Uf objects which illustrate double bilateral symmetry, may be named one of those boats built for moving with equal facility in either di- rection, and therefore made alike at stem and stern. Ob- viously such a boat is separable into equal and similar parts by a vertical plane passing through stem and stern ; and it is also separable into equal and similar parts by a vertical plane cutting it amidships. To exemplify single bilateral symmetry it needs but to turn to the ordinary boat of which the two ends are unlike. Here there remains but the one plane passing vertically through stem and stern, on the op- posite sides of which the parts are symmetrically disposed. These several kinds of symmetry as placed in the fore- going order, imply increasing heterogeneity. The greatest uniformity in shape is shown by the divisibility into like parts in an infinite number of infinite series of ways; and the greatest degree of multiformity consistent with any regularity, is shown by the divisibility into like parts in only a single way. Hence, in tracing up organic evolution as displayed in morphological differentiations, we may ex- pect to pass from the one extreme of spherical symmetry, to the other extreme of single bilateral symmetry. -Tnis expectation we shall find to be completely fulfilled. CHAPTER VII. THE GENERAL SHAPES OF PLANTS. § 217. Amone protophytes those which are by gene.al consent regarded as the simplest, are the Protococci. As shown in Fig. 1, they are globular cells presenting no ob- vious differentiation save that between inner and outer parts. Their uniformity of figure coexists with a mode of life involv- ing the uniform exposure of all their sides to incident forces. The Protococcus nivalis, which colours red the snow through which it spreads with such marvellous rapidity, is subject to no constant contrasts in the amounts of light, heat, air, or moisture, on its upper and lower surfaces. Jor though each individual may have its external parts differently related to environing agencies, yet the new individuals produced by spontaneous fission have no means of maintaining parallel relations of position among their parts. On the contrary, the indefiniteness of the attitudes into which successive generations fall, must prevent the rise of any unlikeness be- tween one portion of the surface and another. Spherical symmetry continues because, on the average of cases, inci- dent forces are equal in all directions. Other orders of Protophyta have much more special forms, along with much more special attitudes: their ho- mologous parts maintaining, from generation to generation, unlike relations to incident forces. The Desmidiacee and 120 MORPHJ)LUGiCAL DEVELOPMENT. Patomacee, of which Figs. 2 and 3 show examples, severally 7 . include genera characterized ® “a by triple bilateral sym- é metry. A Navicula is di- Ae visible into corresponding halves by a transverse plane and by two longitudinal planes—one cutting its valves at right angles and the other passing between its valves. The like is true of those numerous transversely-constricted forms of Desmidiacee, exemplified by the second of the individuals represented in Fig. 2. If now we ask how a Navicula is re- lated to its environment, we see that its mode of life exposes it to three different sets of forces: each set being resolvable into two equal and opposite sets. A Navicula moves in the direction of its length, with either end foremost. Hence, on the average, its ends are subject to like actions from the agencies to which its motions subject it. Further, either end while moving, exposes its right and left sides to amounts of influence which in the long run must be equal. If, then, the two ends are not only like one another, but have cor- responding right and left sides, the symmetrical distribu- tion of parts answers to the symmetrical distribution of forces. Passing to the two edges and the two flat sur- faces, we similarly find a clue to their likenesses and differ- ences 1n their respective relations to the things around them. These locomotive protophytes move through the entangled masses of fragments and fibres produced by decaying organ- isms and confervoid growths. The interstices in such matted accumulations are nearly all of them much longer in one dimension than in the rest—form crevices rather than regular meshes. Hence, a small organism will have much greater facility of insinuating itself through this débris, in which it finds nutriment, if its transverse section is flattened instead of square or circular. And while we see how, by survival of the fittest, a flattened form is likely to be ac- quired by diatoms having this habit ; we also see that like- THE GENERAL SHAPES OF PLANTS. 12) ness will be maintained between the two flat surfaces and between the two edges. For, on the average, the relations of the two flat surfaces to the sides of the openings through which the diatom passes, will be alike; and so, too, on the average, will be the relations of the two edges. In desmids of the type exemplified by the second individual in Fig. 2, a kindred equalization of dimensions is otherwise in- sured. There is nothing to keep one of the two surfaces uppermost rather than the other; and hence, in the long succession of individuals, the two surfaces are sure to be similarly exposed to light and agencies in general. When to this is added the fact that spontaneous fission occurs transversely in a constant way, it becomes manifest that the two ends, while they are maintained in conditions like one another, are maintained in conditions unlike those of the two edges. Here then, as before, triple bilateral symmetry in form, coexists with a triple bilateral symmetry in the average distribution of actions. Still confining our attention to aggregates of the first order, let us next note what results when the two ends are vermanently subject to different conditions. The fixed unicellular plants, of which examples are given in Figs. 4, 5, and 6, severally illustrate the contrast in shape that arises L between the part that is applied to the econ surface and the part that extends into the surrounding medium. These two parts which are the most unlike in their relations to incident forces, are the most unlike in their forms. Ob- |b? ia MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. serve, next, that the part which lifts itself into the water o1 air, is more or less decidedly radial. Each upward growing tubule of Codium adherens, Fig. 4, has its parts disposed with some regularity around its axis; the upper stem and spore-vessel of Hydrogastrum, Fig. 5, display a lateral growth that is approximately equal in every direction; and the branches of the Botrytis, Fig. 6, shoot out with an ap- proach to evenness on all sides. Plants of this low type are naturally very variable in their modes of growth: each individual being greatly modified in form by its special cir- cumstances. But they nevertheless show us a general like- ness between parts exposed to like forces, as well as a general unlikeness between parts exposed to unlike forces. Respecting the forms of these aggregates of the first order, it has only to be added that ciey: are asymmetrical where there is total irregularity in the incidence of forces. We have an example in the indefinitely contorted and branched shape of a fungus-cell, growing as a mycelium among the particles of soil or through the interstices of organic tissue. § 218. Re-illustrations of the general truths which the forms of these vegetal aggregates of the first order display, are furnished by vegetal aggregates of the second order. The equalities and iaenalities of growth in different diree- tions, prove to be similarly related to the equalities and in- equalities of environing actions in different directions. Of spherical symmetry, an instance occurs in the Volvo globator. The ciliated cells, here so united as to produce a small, mulberry-shaped, hollow ball, cause, by the movements of their cilia, a simultaneous rotation of the ball and pro- gress of it through the water. There is nothing to de- termine the axis of rotation or the direction of rotation. And if the axis and direction of rotation continually vary, as we may conclude that they do, then the different mem- bers of the aggregate severally occupy in their turns like positions towards surrounding agencies; and so are not THE GENERAL SHAPES OF PLANTS. - [23 made to lose their homogeneity of form and distribution. Vegetal aggregates of the second order are usually fixed: locomotion is exceptional. Fixity implies that the surface of attachment is differently circumstanced from the free sur- face. Hence we may expect to find, as we do find, that among these rooted aggregates of the second order, as among those of the first order, the primary contrast of shape is between the adherent part and the loose part. Sea weeds variously exemplify this. In some the fronds are very irregular and in some tolerably regular; in some the form is pseudo-foliar and in some pseud-axial; but differing though they do in these respects, they agree in having the end which is attached to a solid body unlike the other end. The same truth is seen in such secondary aggregates as the com- mon fungi, or rather in their immensely-developed organs of fructification. A puff-ball, Fig. 192, presents no other obvious unlikeness of parts than that between its under and upper surfaces. So-too with the stalked kinds that frequent our woods and pastures. Jn the types which Figs. 198, 194, 195, delineate, the unlikenesses between the rooted ends and the expanded ends, as well as between the under and upper surfaces of the expanded ends, are obviously related to this fundamental contrast of conditions. Nor is this relation less clearly displayed in the sessile fungi which grow out from the sides of trees, as shown at a, ), Fig. 196. That which is common to this and the preceding types, ‘s the contrast between the attached end and the free end. From what these forms have in common, let us turn te that which they have not in common, and observe the causes of the want of community. < 94 248 have the flower assuming an ‘{\\ upright attitude, and at the | / | | same time assuming the radial type. This is not to be inter- N preted as a production of ra- | dial symmetry out of bilateral symmetry, under the action of the appropriate conditions. It is rather to be taken as a case of what is termed “ peloria ”’—a reversion to the primitive radial type, from which the bilateral modification had been derived. The significant inference to be drawn from it is, that this primitive radial type had an upright attitude; and P52 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMEXT. that the derivation of a bilateral type from it, occurred along with the assumption of an inclined attitude. We come now to a group of cases above referred to, in which radial symmetry continues to co-exist with that con- stant lateral attitude ordinarily accompanied by the two-sided rorm. Two examples will suffice: one a very large flower, the Hollyhock, and the other a very small flower, the Agri- mony. Why does the radial form here remain unchanged ? and how does its continuance consist with the alleged general law ? Until quite recently I have been unable to find any pro- bable answers to these questions. When the difficulty first presented itself, I could think of no other possible cause for the anomaly, than that the parts of the Hollyhock-flower, unfolding spirally as they do, might have different degrees of spiral twist in different flowers, and might thus not be unfolded in sufficiently-constant positions. But this seemed a very questionable interpretation ; and one which did not obviously apply to the case of the Agrimony. It was only on inquiring what are the special causes of modifications in the forms of flowers, that a more feasible explanation suggested itself; and this would probably never have suggested itself, had not Mr Darwin’s investigations into the fertilization of Orchids led me to take into account an unnoticed agency. The actions which affect the forms of leaves, affect much less decidedly the forms of flowers; and the forms of flowers are influenced by actions that do not influence the forms of leaves. Partly through the direct action of incident forces and partly through the indirect action of natural selection, leaves get their parts distributed in ways that most facilitate their assimilative functions, under the circumstances in which they are placed ; and their several types of symmetry are thus explicable. But in flowers, the petals and fructifying organs of which do not contain chlorophyll, the tendency to grow most where the supply of light is greatest, is less decided, if not absent; and a shape otherwise determined is hence less THE SHAPES OF FLOWERS. 153 liable to alter in consequence of altered relations to sun and air. Gravity, too, must be comparatively ineffective in caus- ing modifications: the smaller sizes of the parts, as well as their modes of attachment, giving them greater relative rigidity. Not, indeed, that these incident forces of the inor- ganic world are here quite inoperative. Fig. #9 219, representing a species of Campanula, shows that the developments of individual flow- ers are somewhat modified by the relations of their parts to general conditions. But the fact to be observed is, that the extreme trans- ee formations which flowers undergo are not likely to be thus caused: some further cause must be sought. And if we bear in mind the functions of flowers, we shall find in their adaptations to their functions, under conditions that are extremely varied, an adequate cause for the different types of symmetry, as well as for the exceptions to them. Flow- ers are parts in which fertilization is effected; and the active agents of this fertilization are insects—bees, moths, butterflies, &. Mr Darwin has shown in many cases, that the forms and positions of the essential organs of fructifica- tion, are such as to facilitate the actions of insects in trans- ferring pollen from the anthers of one flower to the pistil of another — an arrangement produced by natural selection. And here we shall find reason for concluding, that the forms and positions of those subsidiary parts which give the gene- ral shape to the flower, similarly arise by the survival of individuals which have the subsidiary parts so adjusted as to aid this fertilizing process—the deviations from radial sym- metry being among such adjustments. The reasoning is as follows. So long as the axis of a flower is vertical and the conditions are similar all round, a bee or butterfly alight- ing on it, will be as likely to come from one side as from another; and hence, hindrance rather than facilitation would result if the several sides of the flower did not afford it equally 154 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. free access. In like manner, flowers which are distributed over a plant in such ways that their discs open out on planes of all directions and inclinations, will have no tend- ency to lose their radial symmetry; since, on the average, no part of the periphery is differently related to insect- agency from any other part. But flowers so fixed as to open out sideways in tolerably-constant attitudes, have their petals differently related to insect-agency. A bee or butterfly coming to a laterally-growing flower, does not set- tle on it in one way as readily as in another; but almost of necessity settles with the axis of its body inclined upwards towards the stem of the plant. Hence, the side-petals of a flower so fixed, habitually stand to the alighting insect in relations different from those in which the upper and lower petals stand; and the upper and lower petals differ from one another in their relations to it. If, then, there so arises an habitual attitude of the insect towards the petals, there must be some particular arrangement of the petals that will be most convenient to the insect—will most facilitate its en- trance into the flower. Thus we see in many cases, that a long undermost petal or lip, by enabling the insect to settle in such way as to bring its head opposite to the opening of the tube, aids its fertilizing agency. But whatever be the spe- cial modifications of the corolla which facilitate the actions of the particular insects concerned, all of them will conduce to bilateral symmetry ; since they will be alike for the two sides but unlike for the top and bottom. And now we are prepared for understanding the exceptions. Flowers growing sideways can become thus adapted by survival of the fittest, only if they are of such sizes and structures that insect-agency can affect them in the way described. But in the plants named above, this condition is not fulfilled. A Hollyhock-flower is so open, as well as so large, that its petals are not in any appreciable degree differently related to the insects which visit it. On the other hand, the flower of the Agrimony is so small, that unless visited by insects of a THE SHAPES OF FLOWERS. 154 corresponding size which settle as bees and butterflies settle, its parts will not be affected in the alleged manner. That all anomalies of this kind can at once be satisfactorily ex- plained, is scarcely to be expected: the circumstances of each case have to be studied. But it seems not umprobable that they are all due to causes of the kind indicated. § 235. We have already glanced at clusters of flowers for the purpose of considering their shapes as clusters. We must now return to them to observe the modifications under- gone by their component flowers. Among these occur illus- trations of great significance. An example of transition from the radial to the bilateral form in clustered flowers of the same species, is furnished by the cultivated Geraniums, called by florists Pelargoniums. Some of these bearing somewhat small terminal clusters of flowers, which are closely packed together, with their faces almost upwards, have radially-symmetrical flowers. But among other varieties having terminal clusters of which the members are mutually thrust on one side by crowding, the flowers depart very considerably from the radial shape towards the bilateral shape. A like result occurs under like conditions in Rhododendrons and Azaleas. The Verbena, too, furnishes an illustration of radial flowers rendered slightly two-sided by the shght two-sideness of their rela- tions to other flowers in the cluster. And among the Cruci- fere, a kindred case occurs in the cultivated Candytuft. Evidence of a somewhat different kind, is offered us by clustered flowers in which the peripheral members of the clusters differ from the central members; and this evidence is especially conclusive where we find allied species that do not exhibit the deviation, at the same time that they do not fulfil the conditions under which it may be expected. Thus, in Scabiosa succisa, Fig. 250, which bears its numerous small flowers in a hemispherical knob, the component flowers, similarly circumstanced, are all equal and all radial; but in L56 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. Scabiosa arvensis, Fig. 251, in which the numerous small ada flowers form a flattened disk, sf UE Bp .,. only the confined central ones ee are radial: round the edge the S flowers are much larger, and conspicuously bilateral. But the most remarkable and most conclusive proofs of these relations between forms and positions, are those given by the clustered flowers called Umbellifere. In some cases, as where the component flowers have all plenty of room, or where the surface of the umbel is more or less globular, the modifications are not conspicuous ; but where, asin Viburnum, Cherophyllum, Anthriseus, Torilis, Caucalis, Daucus, Tordylium, &c., we have flowers clustered in such ways as to be differently conditioned, we find a num- ber of modifications that are marked and varied in propor- tion as the differences of conditions are marked and varied. In Cherophyl/um, where the flowers of each umbellule are closely placed so as to form a flat surface, but where the umbellules are wide apart and form a dispersed umbel, the umbellules do not differ from one another ; though among the flowers of each umbellule there are decided differences—the central flowers being small and radial, while the peripheral ones are large and bilateral. But in other genera, where not only the flowers of each umbellule but also the umbellules themselves are closely clustered into a flat surface, the umbel- lules themselves become contrasted; and many remarkable secondary modifications arise. In an umbel of Heracleum, for instance, there are to be noted the facts :—Arst, that the external umbellules are larger than the internal ones; second, that in each umbellule the central flowers are less developed than the peripheral ones ; third, that this greater development of the peripheral flowers is most marked in the outer umbellules; fourth, that it is most marked on the outer sides of the outer umbellules; fifth, that while the interior flowers of each umbcllule are radial, the exterior ones are THE SHAPES OF FLOWERS. 157 bilateral; sixth, that this bilateralness is most marked in the peripheva! flowers of the peripheral umbellules; seventh, that the flowers on the outer side of these peripheral umbellules are those in which the bilateralness- reaches a maximum; and eighth, that where the outer umbellules touch each other, the flowers, being unsymmetrically placed, are unsymmietrically bilateral.* The lke modi- fications are displayed, though not in so clearly-trace- able a way, in an umbel of Zordyliwm, Fig. 252. Considering how obviously these various forms are related to the vari- ous conditions, we should be scarcely able, even in the absence of all other facts, to resist the conclusion that the differences in the conditions are the causes of the differ- ences in the forms. Composite flowers furnish evidence so nearly allied to BER that which clustered flowers furnish, that we may fitly glance at them under the same head. Such a common type of this order as the Sun-flower, exemplifies the extremely marked differ- ence that arises in many of these plants between the closely-packed internal florets, each similarly circumstanced on all sides, and the external florets, not similarly circumstanced on all sides. In Fig. 253, representing the inner and outer florets of a Daisy, the contrast is marked between the smal! radial corolla of the one and the larger bilateral corolla of the other. In many cases, how- ever, this contrast is less marked: the inner florets having * T had intended here to insert a figure exhibiting these differences; butas the Cow-parsnip does not flower till July, and as I can find no drawing of the umbel which adequately represents its details, I am obliged to take another instance. 158 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. also their outward-growing prolongations—a difference pos- sibly related to some difference in the habits of the insects that fertilize them. Nevertheless, these composite flowers which have inner florets with strap-shaped corollas out- wardly directed, equally conform to the general principle ; both in the radial arrangement of the assemblage of florets, and in the bilateral shape of each floret; which has its parts alike on the two sides of a line passing from the centre of the assemblage to the circumference. Certain other members of this order fulfil the law somewhat differ- ently. In Centaurea, for instance, the inner florets are small and vertical in direction, while the outer florets are large and lateral in direction. And here may be remarked, in passing, a clear indication of the effect which great flexibility of the petals has in preventing a flower from losing its original radiate form ; for while in C. cyanus, the large outward-grow- ing florets, having short, stiff divisions of the corolla, are decidedly bilateral, in C. scabiosa, where the divisions of the corolla are long and flexible, the radial form is scarcely at all modified. On bearing in mind the probable relations of the forms to insect-agency, the meaning of this difference will not be difficult to understand. § 236. In extremely-varied ways there are thus re-illus- trated among flowers, the general laws of form which leaves and branches and entire plants disclose to us. Composed as each cluster of flowers is of individuals that are originally similar ; and composed as each flower is of homologous foliar organs; we see both that the like flowers become unlike and the like parts of each flower become unlike, where the posi- tions involve unlike incidence of forces. The symmetry remains radial where the conditions are equal all round ; shows deviation towards two-sidedness where there is slight two-sidedness of conditions; becomes decidedly bilateral where the conditions are decidedly bilateral ; and passes into an unsymmetrical form where the relations to the environ- ment are unsymmetrical. CHAPTER XI. THE SHAPES OF VEGETAL CELLS. § 237. We come now to aggregates of the lowest order. Already something has been said (§ 217) concerning the forms of those morphological units which exist as independent plants. But it is here requisite briefly to note the modifica- tions undergone by them where they become components of larger plants. Of the numerous cell-forms which are found in the tissues of the higher plants, it will suffice to give, in Fig. 254, re- presenting a section cf the surface of : a leaf, a single example. In this it Lg a will be seen that the epidermis cells te c, covered by the secreted external layer a, and separated from the layer of cells below them by the masses of inter-cellular substance 6, have differ- entiations of form clearly related to differences in the incidence of forces. Their divergences from primordial sphericity are such as correspond with the un- likenesses in the circumstances of their respective sides. Similarly with the layers below them. And throughout the more complex modifications which the cells of other tissues exhibit, the like correspondence holds. Among plants of a lower order of aggregation, we have.al- ready seen how cells become metamorphosed as they become integrated into masses having definite organizations. The 43 aIt 160 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. higher Alge, exemplified in Figs. 32, 34, 35, show this very clearly. Here the departure from the simple cell-form to the form of an elongated prism, is manifestly ,_q,, Subordinated to the contrasts in the se relations of the parts. And it is interesting to observe how, in one of the branches of Fig. 32, we pass from the small, almost-spherical cells which terminate the branch- lets, to the large, much-modified cells which join the main stem, through gradations obviously related in their changed forms to the altered actions their positions expose them to. More simply, but quite as conclusively, do the inferior Alge, of which Figs. 19—23 are examples, show us how cells pass from their original spherical symmetry into radial symmetry, as they pass from a state in which they are simi- larly-conditioned on all sides, to a state in which two of their opposite sides or ends are conditioned in ways that are lke one another, but unlike the ways in which all other sides are conditioned. Still more instructive are the morphological differentiations of those protophytes in which the first steps towards a higher degree of integration are shown. Fig. 9 represents one of the transitional forms of Desmidiacee. In it we see that the two inner halves by which the individuals are united, differ THE SHAPES OF VEGETAL CELLS. 16] somewhat from the two outer halves. So, too, of the type exemplified by Fig. 10, it is to be noted that besides the difference between the transverse and longitudinal dimensions, which the component units display in common, the two end units differ from the rest: they have appendages which the 8 an; 0 tf2 CO ToC Imm rest have not. Once more, where the integration is car- ried on in such ways as to produce not strings but clusters, there arise contrasts and correspondences just such as might be looked for. All the four members of the group shown in Fig. 12, are similarly conditioned ; and each of them has a bilateral shape answering to its bilateral relations. In Fig. 14 we have a number of similarly-bilateral individuals on the circumference, including a central individual differing from the rest by having the bilateral character nearly obliterated. And then, in Fig. 15, we have two central components of the group, deviating more decidedly from those that surround them. These few typical facts, which must be taken like the few typical facts grouped in each of the foregoing chapters as indicating a mass of evidence too great to be here detailed, will sufficiently show that from the most complex vegetal types down to the most simple, the laws of morphological differentiation remain the same. CEA Pain 1 Xcht. CHANGES OF SHAPE OTHERWISE CAUSED. § 238. BrsipEs the more special causes of modification in the shapes of plants and of their parts, certain more general eauses must be briefly noticed. ‘These may be described as consequences of variations in the total quantities of the matters and forces furnished to plants by their environments. Some of the changes of form so produced are displayed by plants as wholes, and others only by their parts. We will glance at them in this order. § 239. It is a familiar fact that luxuriant shoots have re- latively-long internodes; and, conversely, that a shoot dwarfed from lack of sap, has its nodes closely clustered : the result being that the lateral axes, where these are developed, become in the one case far apart and in the other case neat together. Fig. 255 represents a branch to the parts of which thelongerand shorter internodes so result- ing give differential characters. A whole | tree being in many cases simultaneously thus affected by states of the earth or the air, all parts of it may have such varia- tions impressed on them; and, indeed, such variations, following more or less regu- larly the changes of the seasons, give to ; many trees manifest traits of structure. In Fig. 256, a shoot of Phyllocactus rm aIO ea ae ae oe CHANGES OF SHAPE OTHERWISE CAUSED. 163 erenatus, we have an interesting example of a variation essen- tially of the same nature, little as it appears to be so. For each of the lateral indentations is here the seat of an axillary bud; and these we see are separated by internodes which, becoming broader as they become longer, and narrower as they become shorter, produce changes of form that correspond with changes in the luxuriance of growth. To complete the statement it must be added that these variations of nutrition often determine the development or non-development of lateral axes ; and by so doing cause still more marked structural differences. The Fox-glove may be named as a plant which illustrates this truth. § 240. From the morphological differentiations caused by unlikenesses of nutrition which the whole plant feels, we pass now to those which are thus caused in some of its parts and not in others. Among such are the contrasts between flowering axes, and the axes that bear leaves only. It has already been shown in § 78, that the belief expressed by Wolff in a direct connexion between fructificatien and innu- trition, is justified inductively by many facts of many kinds. Deductively too, in § 79, we saw reason to conclude that such a relation would be established by survival of the fittest ; seeing that it would profit a species for its members to begin sending off migrating germs from the ends of those axes which innutrition prevented from further agamogenetic mul- tiplication. Once more, when considering the nature of the phznogamic axis, we found support for this belief in the fact that the components of a flower exhibit a reversion to that type from which the phenogamic type has probably arisen— a reversion which the laws of embryology would lead us to look for where innutrition had arrested development. Hence, then, we may properly count those deviations of structure which constitute inflorescence, as among the mor- phological ditferentiations produced by local innutrition. Ido not mean that the detailed modifications which the essential 164 MCRPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT and subservient organs of fructification display, are thus accounted for: we have seen reason to think them otherwise caused. But I mean that the morphological characters which distinguish gamogenetic axes in general from agamogenetic axes, such as non-development of the internodes, and dwarf- ing of the foliar organs, are primarily results of failure in the supply of some material required for further growth.* § 241. Another trait which has to be noticed under this head, is the spiral, or rather the helical, arrangement of parts. The successive nodes of a phenogam habitually bear their appendages in ways implying more or less twist in the substance of the axis; and in climbing plants the twist is such as to produce a corkscrew shape. This structure is ascribable to differences of interstitial nutrition. Taking a shoot that is growing vertically, it is clear that if the molecules are added with perfect equality on all sides, there will be no tendency towards any kind of lateral deviation; and the successively-produced parts will be perpendicularly over one * It is but just to the memory of Wolff, here to point out that he was im- mensely in advance of Goéthe in his rationale of these metamorphoses, Whatever greater elaboration Goéthe gave to the theory considered as an induction, seems to me more than counter-balanced by the irrationality of his deductive interpret- ation; which unites medieval physiology with Platonic philosophy. A domin- ant idea with him is that leaves exist for the purpose of carrying off crude juices— that ‘“‘as long as there are crude juices to be carried off, the plant must be pro- vided with organs competent to effect the task ;” that while “ the less pure fluids are got rid of, purer ones are introduced ;” and that “if nourishment is withheld, that operation of natur (flowering) is facilitated and hastened; the organs of the nodes (leaves) become saore refined in texture, the action of the purified juices becomes stronger, and the transformation of parts having now become possible, takes place without delay.” This being the proximate explanation, the ultimate explanation is, that Nature wishes to form flowers—that when a plant flowers it ‘‘attains the end prescribed to it by nature ;” and that so “nature at length at- tains her object.” Instead of vitiating his induction by a teleology that is as unwarranted in its assigned object as in its assigned means, Wolff ascribes the phenomena to a cause which, whether sufficient or not, is strictly scientific in ius character. Variation of nutrition is unquestionably a “ true cause” of vari- ation in plant-structure. We have here no imaginary action of a fictitious ageney ; but an ascertained action of a known agency. CHANGES OF SHAPE OTHERWISE CAUSED. 165 another. But any inequality in the rate of growth-on the different sides of the shoot, will destroy this straightness in the lines of growth. If the greatest and least rates of mole- cular increase happens to be on opposite sides, the shoot must assume a curve of single curvature ; but in every other case of unequal molecular increase, a curve of double curvature will result. Now it is a corollary from the instability of the homogeneous, that the rates of growth on all sides of a shoot can never be exactly alike ; and it is to be also inferred from thesame general law, that the greatestand least ratesof growth will not cccur on exactly opposite sides of the shoot, at the same time that equal rates of growth are preserved by the two other sides. Hence, there must almost inevitably arise more or less of twist; and the appendages of the internodes will so be prevented from occurring perpendicularly one over another. A deviation of this kind, necessarily initiated by physical causes in conformity with the general laws of evolution, is likely to be made regular and decided by natural selection. For under ordinary circumstances, a plant will profit by hay- ing its axis so twisted as to bring the appended leaves into positions that prevent them from shading oneanother. And, manifestly, modifications in the forms, sizes, and insertions of the leaves, may, under the same agency, lead to adapted modifications of the twist. We must therefore ascribe this common characteristic of pheenogams, primarily to local differ- ences of nutrition, and secondarily to survival of the fittest. It is proper to add that there are some Monocotyledons, as Urania speciosa, in which this character does not occur. What conditions of existence they are that here hold this natural tendency in check, it is not easy to see.* * The Natural History Review for July, 1865, contained an article on the docs trine of morphological composition set forth in the foregoing Chaps. I. to III. In this article, which unites exposition and criticism in a way that is unhappily not common with reviewers, it is suggested that the spiral structure may be caused by natural selection. When this article appeared, the foregoing flve pages were etanding over in type, as surplus from No, 14, issued in June, 1869. CHAPTER XIII. MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN ANIMALS. § 242. Tue general considerations which preluded our in- quiry into the shapes of plants and their parts, equally serve, so far as they go, to prelude an inquiry into the shapes of - animals and their parts. Among animals, as among plants, the formation of aggregates greater in bulk or higher in degree of composition, or both, is accompanied by changes of form in the aggregates as wholes as well as by changes of form in their parts; and the processes of morphological differentiation conform to the same general laws in the one kingdom as in the other. It is needless to recapitulate the several kinds of modifi- cation to be expleined, and the several factors that co- operate in working them. In so far as these are common to plants and animals, the preceding chapters have suf- ficiently familiarized them. Nor is it needful to specify afresh the several types of symmetry and their descriptive names; for what is true of them in the one case is true of them in the other. There is, however, one new and all- important factor which we shall have now to take into account ; and about this a few preliminary remarks are requisite. § 243. This new factor is motion—motion of the organism in relation to surrounding objects, or of the parts of the MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN ANIMALS, 167 organism in relation to one another, or both. Though there are plants, especially of the simpler kinds, which move, and though a few of the simpler animals do not move; yet movements are so exceptional and unobtrusive in the one kingdom, while they are so general and conspicuous in the other, that the broad distinction commonly made is well warranted. What, among plants, is an inappreciable cause of morphological differentiation, becomes, among animals, the chief cause of morphological differentiation. Animals that are rooted or otherwise fixed, of course present traits of structure nearest akin to those we have been lately studying. The motions of parts in relation to one another and to the environment, being governed by the mode of aggre- gation and mode of fixing, we are presented with morphological differentiations similar in their general characters to those of plants, and showing us parallel kinds of symmetry under parallel conditions. But animals which move from place to place are subject to an additional class of actions and re- actions. ‘These actions and reactions affect them in various ways according to their various modes of movement. Let us glance at the several leading relations between shape and motion which we may expect to find. If an organism advances through a homogeneous medium with one end always foremost, that end, being exposed to forces unlike those to which the other end is exposed, may be expected to become unlike it; and supposing this to be the only constant contrast of conditions, we may expect an equal distribution of the parts round the axis of move- ment—a radial symmeiry. If in addition to this habitual attitude of the ends, one surface of the body is always uppermost and another always lowermost, there arise between the top and bottom dissimilarities of conditions, while the two sides remain similarly conditioned. Hence it is inferable that such an organism will be divisible into similar halves by a vertical plane passing through its axis of motion—will have a bilateral symmetry. We may presume 168 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. that this symmetry will deviate but little from double bilateralness where the upper and under parts are not exposed to strongly-contrasted influences; while we may rationally look for single bilateral symmetry of a decided kind, in creatures having dorsal and ventral parts conversant with very unlike regions of the environment: as in all cases where the movement is over a solid surface. If the movement, though over a solid surface, is not constant in direction, but takes place as often on one side as on another, radial symmetry may be again looked for; and if the motions are still more variously directed—if they are not limited to approximately-plane surfaces, but extend to surfaces that are distributed all around with a regular irregularity—an ap- proach of the radial towards the spherical symmetry is to be anticipated. Where the habits are such that the intercourse between the organism and its environment, does not involve an average equality of actions and reactions on any two or more sides, there may be expected either total irregularity or some divergence from regularity. The like general relations between forms and incident forces are inferable in the component parts of animals, as well as in the animals as wholes. It is needless, however, to occupy space by descriptions of these. Let us now pass to the facts, and see how they confirm, a postertori, the con- clusions here reached @ p7%07%. CHAPTER XIV. THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. § 244. Cerratn of the Protozoa are quite indefinite in their shapes, and quite inconstant in those indefinite shapes which they have—the relations of their parts are indeter- minate both in space and time. In one of the simpler Rhizopods, at least during the active stage of its existence, no permanent distinction of inside and outside is established ; and hence there can arise no established correspondence between the shape of the outside and the distribution of environing actions. But when the relation of inner and outer becomes fixed, either over part of the mass or over the whole of it, we have kinds of symmetry that correspond with the habitual incidence of forces. An Ameba in be- coming encysted, which we may regard as the production in it of a differentiation between superficial parts and central parts, passes from an indefinite, ever-changing form into a spherical form ; and the order of symmetry which it thus assumes, 1s in harmony with the average equality of the actions on all its sides. In Diffugia Fig. 134, and still better in Arcedlz, we have an indefinitely-radial symmetry eccurring where the conditions are different above and below but alike all around. Among the Giegarinida the spherical symmetry and symmetry passing from that into the radial, are such as appear to be congruous with the simple cir- cumstances of these creatures in the intestines of insects, 170 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELUPMENT. But the relations of these lowest types to their environments are eagle so indeterminate, and our knowledge of their actions so ee that little beyond negative evidence can be expected from the study of them. The like may be said of the Infusoria. These are more or less irregular. In some cases where the line of move- ment through the water is tolerably definite and constant we have a form that is approximately radial—externally at ieast. But usually, as shown in Figs. 137, 138, 139, there is either an unsymmetrical or an asymmetrical shape. And when one of these creatures is watched under the microscope, the congruity of this shape with the incidence of forces 1s mani- fest. For the movements are conspicuously varied and indeterminate—movements which do not expose any two or more sides of the mass to approximately equal sets of actions. § 245. Among aggregates of the second order, as among agorecates of the Ge st eae we find that of those possessing any Hefnite shapes the lowest are spherical or spheroidal. Such are the Thalassicolle. These gelatinous bodies which float passively in the sea, and present in turn all their sides to the same influences, have their parts disposed with ap- proximate regularity all around a centre. In some orders of Foraminifera, as for instance the Nummulites, we have secondary aggregates the parts of which are spirally are ranged, approximately in harmony with the radial relations of the society to the environment; but we have other types in which the congregated units are distributed in ways not easily definable, and having to the environment relations that are obscure. Further, among these secondary aggregates in which the units, only physically integrated, have not had their THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. t71 individualities merged into an individuality of a higher order, must be named the compound Infusoria. The cluster of Vorticelle in Fig. 144, will sufficiently exemplify them ; and the striking resemblance borne by its individuals to those of a radially-arranged cluster of flowers, will show how, under analogous conditions, the general principles of morphological differentiation are similarly illustrated in the two kingdoms. § 246. Radial symmetry is usual in those aggregates of the second order that have their parts sufficiently differentiat- ed and integrated to give individualities to them as wholes. The Celenterata offer numerous examples of this. Solitary polypes—hydroid or helianthoid—mostly stationary, and when they move, moving with any side foremost, do not by lecomotion subject their bodies to habitual contrasts of con- ditions. Seated with their mouths upwards or downwards, or else at all degrees of inclination, the individuals of a species taken together, are subject to no mechanical actions affecting some parts of their discs more than other parts. And this indeterminateness of attitude similarly prevents their relations to prey from being such as subject some of their prehensile organs to forces unlike those to which the rest are subject. The fixed end is differently conditioned from the free end, and the two are therefore different ; but around the axis running from the fixed to the free end the conditions are alike in all directions, and the form therefore is radial. - Again, among many of the simple free- swimming /Tydrozoa, the same general truth is exemplified under other circumstances. In a common Medusa, advanc- ing through the water by the rhythmical contractions of its disc, the mechanical reactions are the same on all sides ; and as, from accidental causes, every part of the edge of the disc comes upwards in its turn, no part is permanently af- fected in a different way from the rest. Hence the radial form continues. 172 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT In others of this same group, however, there occur forms which show us an incipient bilateralness; and help us to see how a more decided bilateralness may arise. Sundry of the Meduside are proliferous, giving origin to gemmez from the body of the central polypite or from certain points on the edge of the disc; and this budding, unless it occurs equally on all sides, which it does not and is unlikely to do, must tend to destroy the balance of the disc, and to make its attitude less changeable. In other cases the growth of a large process from the edge of the disc on one side, as in Steenstrupia, Fig 257—a process that is perhaps the morphological equivalent of one of the gemmee just named—constitutes a similar modi- fication, and a cause of further modification. The existence of this process makes the animal no longer divisible into any two quite similar halves, except those formed by a plane passing through the process; and unless the process is exactly of the same specific gravity as the disc, it must tend towards either the lowest or the highest point, and must so serve to increase the bilateralness, by keeping the two sides of the disc similarly conditioned while the top and bottom are differently conditioned. Fig. 258 represents the underside of another Medusa, in which a more decided bi- lateralness 1s produced by the presence of two such process es. Among the simple free-swimming Actinozoa, occur like deviations from radial sym- . metry, along with like motions i through the water in bilateral attitudes. Of this a Cydippe is afamiliar example. Though radial in some of its characters, as in the distribution of its meridional bands of locomotive paddles with their accompany- ing canals, this creature has a two-sided distribution of tentacles and various other parts, corresponding with its two- sided attitude in moving through the water. And in other THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. 173 genera of this group, as in Cestum, Hurhamphea, and Callianira, that almost equal distribution of parts which characterizes the Beroe is quite lost. Here seems a fit place to meet the objection which some may feel to this and other such illustrations, that they amount very much to physical truisms. If the parts of a Medusa are disposed in radial symmetry around the axis of motion through the water, there will of course be no means of maintaining one part of its edge upwards more than another ; and the equality of conditions may be ascribed to the radiate- ness, as much as the radiateness to the equality of conditions. Conversely, when the parts are not radially arranged round the axis of motion, they must gravitate towards some one attitude, implying a balance on the two sides of a vertical plane—a bilateralness; and the two-sided conditions so _ necessitated, may be as much ascribed to the bilateralness as the bilateralness to the two-sided conditions. Doubt- less the form and the conditions are, in the way alleged, necessary correlates ; and in so far as it asserts this, the ob- jection harmonizes with the argument. To the difficulty which it at the same time raises by the implied question— Why make the form the result of the conditions, rather than the conditions the result of the form? the reply is this :— The radial type, both as being the least differentiated type and as being the most obviously related to lower types, must be taken as antecedent to the bilateral type. The indi- vidual variations which incidental circumstances produce in the radial type, will not cause divergence of a species from the radial type, unless such variations give advantages to the individuals displaying them; which there is no reason to sup- pose they will always do. Those occasional deviations from the radial type, which the law of the instability of the homo- geneous warrants us in expecting to take place, will, however, in sorae cases be beneficial ; and will then be likely to estab- lish themselves. Such deviations must tend to destroy the original indefiniteness and variability of attitude— must L174 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. cause gravitation towards an habitual attitude. And gravita- tion towards an habitual attitude having once commenced, will continually increase, where increase of it is not negatived by adverse agencies: each further degree of bilateralness rendering more decided the actions that conduce to bilateral- ness. If this reply be thought insufficient, it may be enforced by the further one, that as, among plants, the incident forces are the antecedents and the forms the consequents (changes of forces being in many cases visibly followed by changes of forms) we are warranted in concluding that the like order of cause and effect holds among animals. § 247. Keeping to the same type but passing to a higher degree of composition, we meet more complex and varied illustrations of the same general laws. In the compound Celenterata, presenting clusters of individuals that are severally homologous with the solitary individuals last dealt with, we have to note both the shapes of the individuals thus united, and the shapes of the aggregates made up of them. Such of the fixed Hydrozoa and Actinozoa as form branched societies, continue radial ; both because their varied attitudes do not expose them to appreciable differences in their rela- tions to those surrounding actions which chiefly concern them (the actions of prey), and because such differences, even if they were appreciable, would be so averaged in their effects on the dissimilarly-placed members of each group as to be neutralized in the race. Among the “/, tree-like coral-polypedoms, as well as in such ramified assemblages of simpler poly- pes as are shown in Figs. 149, 150, we have, indeed, cases in many respects paral- lel to the cases of scattered flowers (§ 233}, which though placed laterally remain radial, because no differentiating agency can act uniformly on all of them. Meanwhile, in the groups which these united individuals compose, we see the shapes of 2z9 L350 THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. 17 plants further simulated under a further parallelism of con- ditions. The attached ends differ from the free ends as they do in plants; and the regular or irregular branches obvious- ly stand to environing actions in relations analogous to those in which the branches of plants stand. The members of those compound Oelenterata which move through the water by their own actions, in attitudes that are approximately constant. show usa more or less distinct two- sidedness. Diphyes, Fig. 259, furnishes an example. Each 259 of the largely-developed and modified polypites forming its swimming sacs is bilateral, in correspondence with the bi- lateralness of its conditions; and in each of the appended polypites the insertion of the solitary tentacle produces a kindred divergence from the primitive radial type. The ageregate, too, which here very much subordinates its mem- bers, exhibits the same conformity of structure to circum- stances. It admits of symmetrical bisection by a plane pass- ing through its two contractile sacs, or nectocalyces, but not by any other plane ; and the plane which thus symmetrically bisects it, is the vertical plane on the two sides of which its parts are similarly conditioned as it propels itself through the water. Another group of the oceanic Hydrozou, the Physophoride, furnishes interesting evidence—not so much in respect of the forms of the united individuals, which we may pass over, as in respect of the forms of the aggregates. Some of these which are without swimming organs, have their parts sus- pended from air-vessels which habitually float on the surface of the water; and the distribution of their parts is asym- 44 176 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. metrical. The Physalia, Fig. 152,is an example. Here the relations of the integrated group of individuals to the environ- ment are indefinite; and there is hence no agency tending to change that comparatively irregular mode of growth that is probably derived from a primordial ee type of the branched Hydrozoa. So various are the modes of union ~~ among the compound Celenterata, that it is out of the question to deal with them all. Even did space permit, it would be impracticable for any one but a professed naturalist, to trace through- | out this group the relations between shapes and conditions of existence. The above must be taken simply as a few of the most significant and easily-interpret- able cases. 154 § 248. In the sub-kingdom Mollus- coida, we meet with examples not wholly unlike the foregoing. Among the types assembled under this title there are simple individuals or aggregates of the second order, and societies or tertiary aggregates produced by their union. The relations of forms to forces have to be traced in both. Solitary Ascidians, fixed or floating, carry on an inactive and indefinite converse with the actions in the environment. Without power to move about vivaciously, and unable to catch any prey but that contained in the currents of water they absorb and expel, these creatures are not exposed to sets of forces that are equal on two or more sides; and their shapes consequently remain vague. Though there are in them traces of symmetrical arrangement, probably due to their derivation, yet they are substantially asymmetrical. Fig. 156 is an example. Among the composite Ascidians, floating and fixed, the shape of the aggregate, THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. 177 partly determined by the habitual mode of gemmation and partly by the surrounding conditions in each case, is in great measure indefinite. We can say no more about it than that it is not obviously at variance with the laws alleged. Evidence of a more positive kind occurs among those com- pound Molluscoida which are most lke the compound Celenterata in their modes of union—the Polyzoa. Many of these form groups that are more or less irregular—spreading as films over solid surfaces, combining into sea-weed-like fronds, budding out from creeping stolons, or growing up into tree-shaped societies; and besides aggregating ir- regularly they are irregularly placed on surfaces inclined in all directions. Merely noting that this asymmetrical dis- tribution of the united individuals is explained by the absence of definiteness in the relations of the aggregate to incident forces, it concerns us chiefly to observe that the united individuals severally exemplify the same truth as do similarly-united individuals among the Coelenterata. While their internal organs, though said to have a trace of bi- lateralness, cannot be said to display any definite symmetry ; their external organs are completely radial. Averaging the members of each society, the ciliated tentacles they protrude are similarly related to prey on all sides; and therefore remain the same on all sides. This distribution of tentacles is not, however, without exception. Among the fresh-water Polyzoa there are some genera, as Plumatella and Crystatella, in which the arrangement of these parts is very decidedly bilateral. Some species of them show us such relations of the individuals to one another and to their surface of attach- mert, as give a clue to this modification ; but in other species the meaning of this deviation from the radial type is not obvious. § 249. In that somewhat heterogeneous assemblage of animals now classed, perhaps provisionally, as Annuloida, we begin again with simple aggregates of the second order, and 178 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. ascend to aggregates in which we have seen reason to suspect a higher degree of composition. Good examples of the con- nexions between forms and forces occur in this group. Among the lower annuloid types, the Planaria exemplifies the single bilateral symmetry which, even in very inferior forms, accompanies the habit of moving in one direction over a solid surface. Humbly organized as are these creatures and their allies the Nemertide, we see in them just as clearly as in the highest animals, that where the movements subject _ the body to different forces at its two ends, different forces on its under and upper surfaces, and like forces along. its two sides, there arises a corresponding form, unlike at its extremi- ties, unlike above and below, but having its two sides alike. The Echinodermata furnish us with instructive illustrations —instructive because among types that are nearly allied, we meet with wide deviations of form answering to marked con-— trasts in the relations to the environment. The facts fall into four groups. The Crinoidea, once so abundant and now so rare, present a radial symmetry answering to an incidence of forces that is equal on every side. In the general attitudes of their parts towards surrounding actions, they are like uniaxial plants or like polypes; and show, as they do, marked differences between the attached ends and the free ends, along with even distributions of parts all round their axes. In the Ophiuridea, proved to be near akin to the Crinoids, and in the Star-fishes, we have radial symmetry co-existing with very different habits; but habits which nevertheless account for the maintenance of the form. Holding on to rovks and weeds by its simple or branched arms, or by the suckers borne on the under surface of its rays, one of these creatures moves about not always with one side foremost, but with any side foremost. Consequently, averaging its movements, its arms or rays are equally af- fected, and therefore remain the same on all sides. On watching the ways of the common Sea-urchin, we are similarly furnished with an explanation of its spherical, or THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. 179 rather its spheroidal, figure. Here the habit is not to move over any one approximately-flat surface ; but the habit is to hold on by several surfaces on difierent sides at the same time. Frequenting crevices and the interstices among stones and weeds, the Sea-urchin protrudes the suckers arranged in meridional bands over its shell, laying hold of objects now on this side and now on that, now above and now below: the result being, that it does not move in all directions over one plane but in all directions through space. Hence the approach in general form towards spherical symmetry—an approach which is, however, restrained by the relations of the parts to the mouth and vent: the conditions not being exactly the same at the two poles as at other parts of the surface. Still more significant is that deviation from this shape which occurs among such of the Echinidea as have habitats of a different kind, and, consequently, dif- ferent habits. The genera Echinocyamus, Spatangus, Bris- sus, and Amplidotus, diverge markedly towards a bilateral structure. These creatures are found not on rocky shores but on flat sea-bottoms, and some of them only on bottoms of sand or mud. Here, there is none of that distribution of surfaces on all sides which makes the spheroidal form con- gruous with the conditions. Having to move about over an approximately-horizontal plane, any deviation of structure which leads to one side being kept always foremost, will be an advantage: greater fitness to function becoming possible in proportion as function becomes fixed. Survival of the fittest will therefore tend to establish, under such conditions, a form that keeps the same part in advance—a form in which, consequently, tlie original radial symmetry diverges more and more towards bilateral symmetry. It may be well to add that the validity of these interpretations does not depend on the view taken of the alliances of the Echino- derms, and their primitive type of symmetry. If, as Pro fessor Huxley contends, the Echinoderms, having bilateral larvee, cannot be held akin to those lower types in which the L80 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. radial structure is constant and complete; it does not follow that the above reasonings are erroneous. On the contrary the derivation of these radially-symmetrical forms from forms not radially-symmetrical, would show how entirely the structure of the organism is moulded by the distribution of forces to which its mode of life exposes it. The remaining Annuloida, most of them parasitic, must be passed over. J.iving within the bodies of other creatures. they have their forms determined by conditions that are too cbscure to be satisfactorily dealt with. § 250. Very definite and comparatively uniform, are the relations between shapes and circumstances among the Annulosa—including under that title the Annelida and the Articulata. ‘The agreements and the disagreements are equally instructive. At one time or other of its life, if not throughout its life, every annulose animal is locomotive; and its temporary or permanent locomotion, being carried on with one end habitually foremost and one surface habitually uppermost, it fulfils those conditions under which bilateral symmetry arises. Accordingly, bilateral symmetry is traceable through- out the whole of this sub-kingdom. Traceable, we must say, because, though it is extremely conspicuous in the immense majority of annulose types, it is to a consider- able extent obscured where obscuration is to be expected. The embryos ut the Tubicole, after swimming about awhile, settle down and build themselves tubes, from which they protrude their heads; and in them, or in some of them, the bilateral symmetry is disguised by the develop- ment of head-appendages in an all-sided manner. The tentacles of Yerebella are distributed much in the same way as those of a polype. The breathing organs in Sabella unisptra, Fig. 260, do not correspond on opposite sides of a median plane. Even here, however, the body retains its primitive bilateralness; and it is further to be remarked that THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. 181 this less of bilateralness in the external appendages, does not occur where the relations to external conditions continue bilateral: witness the Serpula, Fig. 261, which has its respiratory tufts arranged in a two-sided way, under the two-sided conditions involved by the habitual position of its tube. The community of symmetry among the higher Annulosa, has an unobserved significance. That Fles, Beetles, Lob- sters, Centipedes, Spiders, Mites, have in common _ the characters, that the end which moves in advance differs from the hinder end, that the upper surface differs from the under surface, and that the two sides are alike, is a truth received as a matter of course. After all that has been said above, how- ever, it will be seen to have a meaning not to be overlooked ; since 1t supplies a million-fold illustration of the laws that have been set forth. It is needless to give diagrams. Every reader can call to mind the unity indicated. While, however, annulose animals repeat so uniformly these traits of structure, there are certain other traits in which they are variously contrasted; and their contrasts have to be here noted, as serving further to build up the general argument. In them we see the stages through which biiateral symmetry becomes gradually more marked, as the conditions it responds to become more decided. A 182 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. common Earth-worm may be instanced as a member of this sub-kingdom that is among the least-conspicuously bilateral. Though internally its parts have a two-sided arrangement; and though the positions of its orifices give it an external two-sidedness, at the same time that they estab- lish a difference between the two ends; yet its two-sidedness is not strongly marked. The form deviates but little from what we have distinguished as triple bilateral symmetry: if the creature is cut across the middle, the head and tail ends are very much alike; if cut in two along its axis by a hori- zontal plane, the under and upper halves are very much alike ; and if cut in two along its axis by a vertical plane, the two sides are quite alike. Figs. 263 and 264 will make this clear. Such creatures as the Judus and the Centipede, may be taken as showing a transition to double bilateral symmetry. Besides being divisible into exactly similar halves by a vertical plane passing through the axis, one of these animals may be bisected transversely into parts that differ only slightly; but if cut in two by a horizontal plane passing through the axis, the under and upper halves are decidedly unlike. Figs. 265, 266, exhibit these traits Among the isopodous crustaceans, the departure from these low types of symmetry is more marked. As shawn in Figs. 267 and 268, the contrast between the upper and under parts is greater, and the head and tail ends differ THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. 183 more obviously. In all the higher Articulata, the unlikeness between the front half and the hind half has become conspicuous: there is in them single bilateral symmetry of so pronounced a kind, that no other resem- blance is suggested than that between the two sides. By Figs. 269 and 270, representing a decapodous crustacean divided longitudinally and transversely, this truth is made manifest. On calling to mind the habits of the creatures here drawn and described, it will be seen that they explain these forms. The incidence of forces is the same all around the Earth-worm as it burrows through the compact ground. The Centipede, creeping amid loose soil or - débris or beneath stones, insinuates itself between solid sur- faces—the interstices being mostly greater in one dimension than in others. And all the higher Annulosa, moving about as they do over exposed objects, have their dorsal and ventral parts as dissimilarly acted upon as are their two ends. One other fact only respecting annulose animals needs to be noticed under this head—the fact, namely, that they become unsymmetrical where their parts are unsymmetrically related to the environment. The common Hermit-crab serves as an instance. Here, in addition to the unlikeness of the two sides implied by that curvature of the body which fits the creature to the shell it inhabits, there is an wnlikeness due to the greater development of the limbs, and especially the claws, on the outer side. As in the embryo of the Hermit-crab the two sides are alike; and as the embryo may be taken to represent the type from which the Hermit-crab has been derived; we have in this case evidence that a symmetrically-bi- lateral form has been moulded into an unsym- metrically-bilateral form, by the action of un- symmetrically-bilateral conditions. A further illustration is supplied by Bopyrus, Fig. 271: 27L a parasite the habits of which similarly account for its dis- torted shape. 184 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. § 251. Among the Mollusca we find more varied relations between shapes and circumstances. Some of them are highly instructive. Mollusks of one order, the Pteropoda, swim in the sea much in the same way that butterflies fly in the air, and have shapes not altogether unlike those of butterflies. Fig. 272 represents one of thesecreatures. That its bilaterally-sym- metrical shape harmonizes with itsbilaterally- symmetrical conditions is sufficiently obvious. 272 Among the Lamellibranchiata, we have diverse forms accompanying diverse modes of life. Such of them as frequently move about, like the fresh- water Mussel, have their two valves and the contained parts alike on the opposite sides of a vertical plane: they are bilaterally symmetrical in conformity with their mode of movement. The marine Mussel, too, though habitually fixed, and though not usually so fixed that its two valves are similarly conditioned, still retains that bilateral symmetry which is characteristic of the order; and it does this because in the species considered as a whole, the two valves are not dissimilarly conditioned. If the positions of the various individuals are averaged, it will be seen that the differenti- ating actions neutralize one another. In certain other fixed Lamellibranchs, however, there is a considerable deviation from bilateral symmetry ; and it is a deviation of the kind to be anticipated under the circumstances. Where one valve is always downwards, or next to the surface of attachment, while the other valve is always upwards, or next to the environing water, we may expect to find the two valves become unlike. This we do find: witness the Oyster. In the Oyster, too, we see a further irregularity. There isa great indefiniteness of outline, both in the shell and in the animal — an indefiniteness made manifest by comparing different individuals. We have but to remember that growing clustered together, as Oysters do, they must interfere with THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. 185 one another in various ways and degrees, to see how the indeterminateness of form and the variety of form are accounted for. Among the Gasteropods, modifications of a more definite kind occur. “In all Mollusks,” says Professor Huxley, “the axis of the body is at first straight, and its parts are arranged symmetrically with regard to a longitudinal verti- cal plane, just as in a vertebrate or an articulate embryo.” In some Gasteropods, as the Chiton, this bilateral sym- metry is retained—the relations of the body to surround- ing actions not being such as to disturb it. But in those more numerous types that have spiral shells, there is a marked deviation from bilateral symmetry, as might be ex- pected. ‘This asymmetrical over-development never affects the head or foot of the mollusk:” only those parts which, by inclosure in a shell, are protected from environing actions, lose their bilateralness; while the external parts, subjected by the movements of the creatures to bilateral conditions, remain bilateral. Here, however, a difficulty meets us. Why is it that the naked Gasteropods, such as our common slugs, deviate from bilateral symmetry, though their modes of movement are those along with which complete bilateral symmetry usually occurs? The reply is, that their devia- tions from bilateral symmetry are probably inherited, and that they are maintained in such parts of their organiza- tion as are not exposed to bilaterally-symmetrical conditions. There is reason to believe that the naked Gasteropods are descended from Gasteropods that had shells: the evidence being that the naked Gasteropods have shells during the early stages of their development, and that some of them retain rudimentary shells throughout life. Now the shelled Gasteropods deviate from bilateral symmetry in the dis- position of both the alimentary system and the reproductive system. The naked Gasteropods, in losing their sheils, have lost that immense one-sided development of the alimentary system which fitted them to their shells, and have acquired 186 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT that bilateral symmetry of external figure which fits them for their habits of locomotion ; but the reproductive system remains one-sided, because, in respect to it, the relations to external conditions remain one-sided. The Cephalopods, which are interpretable as higher de- velopments on the Gasteropod type, show us bilaterally-sym- metricalexternal forms along with habits of movement through the water in two-sided attitudes. At the same time, in the radial distribution of the arms, enabling one of these creatures to take an all-sided grasp of its prey, we see how readily upon one kind of symmetry there may be partially developed another kind of symmetry, where the relations to conditions favour it. § 252. The Vertebrata illustrate afresh the truths which we have already traced among the Annulosa. Flying through the air, swimming through the water, and running over the earth as vertebrate animals do, in common with annulose animals, they are, in common with annulose ani- mals, different at their anterior and posterior ends, different at their dorsal and ventral surfaces, but alike along their two sides. This single’ bilateral symmetry remains constant under the extremest modifications of form. Among fish we see it alike in the horizontally-flattened Skate, in the vertically-flattened Bream, in the almost spherical Diodon, and in the greatly-elongated Syngnathus. Among reptiles the Turtle, the Snake, and the Crocodile all display it. And under the countless modifications of structure displayed by birds and mammals, it remains conspicuous. A less obvious fact which it concerns us to note among the Vertebrata, parallel to one which we noted among the Annulosa, is that whereas the lower vertebrate forms deviate but little from triple bilateral symmetry, the deviation be- comes great as we ascend. Figs. 273 and 274 show how, besides being divisible into similar halves by a vertical plane passing through its axis, a Fish is divisible into halves that are not very dissimilar by a horizontal plane passing through THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMAIS. 187 its axis, and also into other not very dissimilar halves by a plane cutting it transversely. If, as shown in Figs. 275 and 276, analogous sections be made of a superior Reptile, the divided parts differ more decidedly. When a Mammal anda Bird are treated in the same way, as shown in Figs. 277, 278, and Figs. 279, 280, the parts marked off by the divid- 273 ap ih, 2 i ae ing = are unlike in far greater degrees. On considering the mechanical converse between organisms of these several types and their environments—on remembering that the fish habitually moves through a homogeneous medium of nearly the same specific gravity as itself, that the terrestrial reptile either crawls on the surface or raises itself very in- completely above it, that the more active mammal, having 188 MORPHOLUGICAL DEVELOPMENT. its supporting parts more fully developed, thereby has the under half of its body made more different from the upper half, and that the bird is subject by its mode of life to yet another set of actions and reactions; we shall see that these facts are quite congruous with the general doctrine, and fur- nish further support to it. One other significant piece of evidence must be named. Among the Annulosa we found unsymmetrical bilateralness in creatures having habits exposing them to unlike conditions on their two sides; and among the Vertebrata we find parallel cases. They are presented by the Pleuronectide—the order of distorted flat fishes to which the Sole and the Flounder belong. On the hypothesis of evolution, we must conclude that fishes of this order have arisen from an ordinary bila- terally-symmetrical type of fish, which, feeding at the bottom of the sea, gained some advantage by placing itself ‘ with one of its sides downwards, instead of maintaining the vertical attitude. Besides the general reason there are speci- fic reasons for concluding this. In the first place, the young Sole or Flounder is bilaterally symmetrical—has its eyes on opposite sides of its head, and swims in the usual way. In the second place, the metamorphosis which produces the unsym- metrical structure sometimes does not take place—there are abnormal Flounders that swim vertically, like other fishes. In the third place, the transition from the symmetrical structure to the unsymmetrical structure may be traced. Almost incredible though it seems, one of the eyes is transferred from the under-side of the head to the upper- side. Until lately it was supposed that the change by which the two eyes, originally placed on opposite sides, come to be placed on the same side, is effected by a distortion of the cranium ; but it is now asserted that actual migration of an eye occurs. According to Prof. Steenstrup, the eye passes between the ununited bones of the skull ; but according to Prof. Thomson, it passes under the skin. Be the course of the metamorphosis what it may, however, it furnishes several THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. 189 remarkable illustrations of the way in which forms become moulded into harmony with incident forces. For besides this divergence from bilateral symmetry involved by the presence of both eyes upon the upper side, there is a further divergence from bilateral symmetry involved by the differ- entiation of the two sides in respect to the contours of their surfaces and the sizes of their fins. And then, what is still more significant, there is a near approach to likeness be- tween the halves that were originally unlike, but are, under the new circumstances, exposed to like conditions. The body is divisible into similarly-shaped parts by a plane cutting it along the side from head to tail: “ the dorsal and ventral instead of the lateral halves become symmetrical in outline and are equipoised.” § 253. Thus, little as there seems in common between the shapes of plants and the shapes of animals, we yet find, on analysis, that the same general truths are displayed by both. The one ultimate principle that in any organism equal amounts of growth take place in those directions in which the incident forces are equal, serves as a key to the phenomena of morphological differentiation. By it we are furnished with interpretations of those lkenesses and un- likenesses of parts, which are exhibited in the several kinds of symmetry; and when we take into account inherited effects, wrought under ancestral conditions contrasted in various ways with present conditions, we are enabled to comprehend, in a general way, the actions by which animals have been moulded into the shapes they possess. To fill up the outline of the argument, so as to make it correspond throughout with the argument respecting vegetal forms, it would be proper here to devote a chapter to the differentiations of those homologous segments out of which animals of certain types are composed. Though, among most annals of the third degree of composition, such as the root- ed Hydrozoa, the Polyzoa, and the Ascidioida, the united 190 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. individuals are not reduced to the condition of segments of a composite individual, and do not display any marked differ- entiations; yet there are some animals in which such subordinations, and consequent heterogeneities, occur. Ths oceanic Hydrozoa form one group; and we have seen reason to conclude that the Annulosa form another group. It is not worth while, however, to occupy space in detailing these unlikenesses of homologous segments, and seeking specific explanations of them. Among the oceanic Hydrozoa they are extremely varied ; and the habits and derivations of these creatures are so little known, that there are no adequate data for interpreting the forms of the parts in terms of their relations to the environment. Conversely, among the dn- nulcsa those differentiations of the homologous segments which accompany their progressing integration, have so much in common, and have general causes which are so ob- vious, that it is needless to deal with them at any length. They are all explicable as due to the exposure of different parts of the chain of segments to different sets of actions and re- actions: the most general contrast being that between the anterior segments and the posterior segments, answering to the most general contrast of conditions to which annulose animals subject their segments; and the more special con- trasts answering to the contrasts of conditions entailed by their more special habits. Were an exhaustive treatment of the subject practicable, there should here, also, come a chapter devoted to the internal structures of animals—meaning, more especially, the shapes and arrangements of the viscera. The relations between forms and forces among these inclosed parts, are, however, mostly too obscure to allow of interpretation. Protected as” the viscera are in great measure from the incidence of ex- ternal forces, we are not likely to find much correspondence between their distribution and the distribution of external forces. In this case the influences, partly mechanical, partly physiological, which the organs exercise on one another, THE GENERAL SHAPES OF ANIMALS. 19] become the chief causes of their changes of figure and ar- rangement ; and these influences are complex and indefinite. One general fact may, indeed, be noted—the fact, namely, that the divergence towards asymmetry which generally characterizes the viscera, 1s marked among those of them which are most removed from mechanical converse with the environment, but not so marked among those of them which are less removed from such converse. Thus while, through- out the Vertebrata, the alimentary system, with the exception of its two extremities, is asymmetrically arranged, the re- spiratory system, which occupies one end of the body, ge- nerally deviates but little from bilateral symmetry, and the reproductive system, partly occupying the other end of the body, is in the main bilaterally symmetrical: such deviation from bilateral symmetry as occurs, being found in its most interiorly-placed parts, the ovaries. dust indicating these facts as having a certain significance, it will be best to leave this part of the subject as too involved for detailed treat- ment. Internal structures of one class, however, not included among the viscera, admit of general interpretation—struc- tures which, though internal, are brought into tolerably- direct relations with the environing forces, and are therefore subordinate in their forms to the distribution of those forces. These internal structures it will be desirable to deal with at some length ; both because they furnish important illustra- tions enforcing the general argument, and because an inter- pretation of them which we have seen reason to reject, zannot be rejected without raising the demand for scime other interpretation. CHAPTER: XY. THE SHAPES OF VERTEBRATE SKELETONS. § 254. Wuen an elongated mass of any substance is transversely strained, different parts of the mass are ex- posed to forces of opposite kinds. If, for example, a bar of metal or wood is supported at its two ends, as shown in Fig. 281, and has to bear a weight on its centre, its lower /\ part is thrown into a state of tension, while its upper part is thrown into a state of compression. As will be manifest to any one who has observed what happens on breaking a stick across his knee, the greatest degree of tension falls on the fibres that form the convex surface, while the fibres forming the concave surface are subject to the greatest degree of compression. Between these extremes the fibres at different depths are subject to different forces. Progressing upwards from the under surface of the bar shown in Fig. 281, the tension of the fibres becomes less; and progressing down- wards from the upper surface, the compression of the fibres becomes less; until, at a certain distance between the two surfaces, there is a place at which the fibres are neither ex- tended nor compressed. This, shown by the dotted line in THE SHAPES OF VERTEBRATE SKELETONS. 193 the figure, is called in mechanical language the “neutral axis.” It varies in position with the nature of the substance strained: being, in common pine-wood, at a distance of about five eighths of the depth from the upper surface or three eighths from the under surface. Clearly, if such a piece of wood instead of being subject to a downward force is secured at its ends and subject to an upward force, the distribution of the compressions and tensions will be reversed, and the neutral axis will be nearest to the upper surface. Fig. 282 represents these opposite attitudes of the bar and the changed position of its neutral axis: the arrow indicating the direc- tion of the force producing the upward bend, and the faint dotted line a, showing the previous position of the neutral axis. Between the two neutral axes will be seen a central space, and it is obvious that when the bar has its strain from time to time reversed, the repeated changes of its molecular con- dition must affect the central space in a way different from that in which they affect the two outer spaces. Fig. 283 is a diagram conveying some idea of these contrasts in molecular condition. If A BC D be the middle part of a bar thus treated, while G H and K L are the alternating neutral axes; then the forces to which the bar is in each case subject, may be readily shown. Supposing the deflecting force to be acting in the direction of the arrow E, then the tensions to which the fibres between G and F are exposed, will be represented by.a series of lines increasing in length as the distance from G increases; so that the triangle G F M, will express the amount and distribution of all the molecular tensions. But the molecular compressions throughout the spuce from G to E, must balance the molecular tensions; and hence, if the triangle G E N be made equal to the tri- Lv4 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. angle G F M, the parallel lines of which it is composed (here dotted for the sake of distinction) will express the amount and distribution of the compressions between E and G. Similarly, when the deflecting force is in the direction of the arrow 1, the compressions and tensions will be quantitatively symbolized by the triangle K F O, and K E P. And thus the several spaces occupied by full lines and by dotted lines and by the two together, will represent the different actions to which different parts of the transverse section are subject by alternating transverse strains. Here then it is made manifest to the eye that the central space between G and K, is differently conditioned from the spaces above and below it; and that the difference of condition is sharply marked off. The fibres forming the outer surface C D, are subject to violent tensions and violent compressions. Pro- gressing inwards the tensions and compressions decrease—- the tensions the more rapidly. As we approach the point G, the tensions to which the fibres are alternately subject, bear smaller and smaller ratios to the compressions, and disappear at the point G. Thence to the centre occur compressions THE SHAPES OF VERTEBRATE SKELETONS. 195 only, of alternating intensities, becoming at the centre small and equal; and from the centre we advance, through a reverse series of changes, to the other side. Thus it is demonstrable that any substance in which the power of resisting compression is unequal to the power of resisting tension, cannot be subject to alternating trausverse strains, without having a central portion differentiated in its conditions from the outer portions, and consequently dif- ferentiated in its structure. This conclusion may easily be verified by experiment. If something having a certain tough- ness but not difficult to break, as a thick piece of sheet lead, be bent from side to side till it is broken, the surface of frac- ture will exhibit an unlikeness of texture between the inner and outer parts. § 255. And now for the application of this seemingly-irre- levant truth. Though it has no obvious connection with the interpretation of vertebral structure, we shall soon see that it fundamentally concerns us. The simplest type of vertebrate animal, the fish, has a mode of locomotion which involves alternating transverse strains. It is not, indeed, subjected to alternating transverse strains by some outer agency, as in the case we have been investigating: it subjects itself to them. But though the strains are here internally produced instead of externally produced, the case is not therefore removed into a wholly different category. For sup- posing Fig. 28+4 to represent the outline of a fish when bent on one side (the dotted lines representing its outline when the bend is reversed), it is clear that part of the sub- stance forming the convex half must be in a state of tension. This state of tension implies the existence in the other half of some counter-balancing compression. And between the two there must be a neutral axis. The way in which this conclusion is reconcilable with the fact that there is tensiun 196 MORPITO'.OGICAL DEVELOPMENT. somewhere in the concave side of a fish, since the curve is caused by muscular contractions on the concave side, will be made clear by the rude illustration which a bow supplies. A bow may be bent by a thrust against its middle (the two ends being held back), or it may be bent by contracting 4 string that unites its ends; but the distributions of me- chanical forces within the wood of the bow, though not quite alike in the two cases, will be very similar. Now while the muscular action on the concave side of a fish differs from that represented by the tightened string of a bow, the difference is not such as to destroy the applicability of the illustration : the parallel holds so far as this, that within that portion of the fish’s body which is passively bent by the contracting muscles, there must be, as in a strung bow, a part in com- pression, a part in tension, and an intermediate part which is neutral. Recognizing the fact that even in the developed fish with its complex locomotive apparatus, this law of the transverse strain holds in a qualified way, we shall understand how much more it must hold in any form that may be supposed to initiate the vertebrate type—a form devoid of that seg- mentation by which the vertebrate type is more or less cha- racterized. We shall see that assuming a rudimentary animal still simpler than the Amphiorus, to have a feeble power of moving itself through the water by the undulations of its body, or some part of its body, there will necessarily come into play certain reactions that must affect the median portion of the undulating mass in a way unlike that in which they affect its lateral portions. And if there exists in this median portion a tissue that keeps its place with any constancy, we may expect that the differential conditions produced in it by the transverse strain, will initiate a dif- ferentiation. It is true that the distribution of the viscera in the Amphiorus, Fig. 191, and in the type from which we may suppose it te arise, is such as to interfere with this THE SHAPES OF VERTEBRATE SKELETONS. 197 process. It is also true that the actions and reactions de-. scribed would not of themselves give to the median portion a cylindrical shape, like that of the cartilaginous rod run- ning along the back of the Amphiorus. But what we have here to note in the first place is, that these habitual alternate flexions have a tendency to mark off from the outer parts an unlike inner part, which may be seized hold of, main- tained, and further modified, by natural selection, should any advantage thereby result. And we have to note in the second place, that an advantage zs likely to result. The eon- tractions cannot be effective in producing undulations, un- less the general shape of the body is maintained. External muscular fibres unopposed by an internal resistent mass, would cause collapse of the body. To meet the require- ments there must be a means of maintaining longitudinal rigidity without preventing bends from side to side; and such a means is presented by a structure initiated as described. In brief, whether we have or have not the actual cause, we have here at any rate ‘‘a true cause.” Though there are difficulties in tracing out the process in a specific way, 1t may at least be said that the mechanical genesis of this rudiment- ary vertebrate axis is quite conceivable. And even the difficulties may, I think, be much more fully met than ~ would at first sight seem possible. What is to be said of the other leading trait which the simplest vertebrate animal has in common with all higher vertebrate animals—the segmentation of its lateral mus: L198 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. cular masses? Is this, too, explicable on the mechanical hypothesis? Have we, in the perpetual transverse strains, a cause for the fact that while the rudimentary vertebrate axis is without any divisions, there are definite divisions of the substance forming the animal’s sides? I think we have. A glance at the distribution of forces under the transverse strain, as represented in the foregoing diagrams, will show how much more severe is the strain on the outer parts than on the inner parts; and how, consequently, any modifications of structure eventually necessitated, will arise peripherally before they arise centrally. The perception of this may be enforced by a simple experiment. Take a stick of sealing-wax and warm it slowly and moderately before the fire, so as to give it a little flexibility. Then bend it gently until it is curved into a semi-circle. On the convex surface small cracks will be seen, and on the concave sur- face wrinkles; while between the two the substance remains undistorted. If the bend be reversed and re-reversed, time ‘after time, these cracks and wrinkles will become fissures which gradually deepen. But now, if changes of this class, en- tailed by perpetual transverse strains, commence superficially, as they manifestly must; there arise the further questions— What will be the special modifications produced under these special conditions? and through what stages will these modifi- cations progress ? Every one has literally at hand an example of the way in which a dexible external layer that is now ex- tended and now compressed, by the bending of the mass it covers, becomes creased ; and a glance at the palms and the fingers will show that the creases are near one another where the skin is thin, and far apart where tke skin is thick. Between this familiar case and the case of the rhinoceros- hide, in which there are but a few large folds, various grada- tions may be traced. Now the like must happen with the increasing layers of contractile fibres forming the sides of the muscnlar tunic in such a type as that supposed. The beni» gs will produce in. them small wrinkles while they are THE SHAPES OF VERTEBRATE SKELETONS. 199 thin, but more decided and comparatively distant fissures as they become thick. Fig 289, which is a horizontal longitudinal section, shows how these thickening layers will adjust “NN NOUS themselves on the convex and the con- cave surfaces, supposing the fibres of 42-2253." which they are composed to be oblique, as their function requires; and it is not difficult to see that when once definite divisions have been established, they will advance inwards as the layers develop ; and will so produce a series of muscular bundles. Here then we have something like the myocommata which are traceable in the Amphioxus, and are conspicuous in all superior fishes. 239 § 256. These speculative conceptions I have ventured to present with the view of showing that the hypothesis of the mechanical genesis of vertebrate structure, is not wholly at fault when applied to the most rudimentary vertebrate ani- mal, Lest it should be alleged that the question is begged if we set out with a type which, like the Amphioxus, already displays segmentation throughout its muscular system, it seemed needful to indicate conceivable modes in which there may have been mechanically produced those leading traits that distinguish the Ampfiozus. It seemed needful to assign an origin for the notochord; and to this we see a clue in the differentiating effects of the transverse strain. It seemed needful to account for the existence of muscular divisions while yet there are no vertebral divisions; and for this, also, the transverse strain furnishes a feasible reason. But now, having sbown that the actions and reactions in- volved by its mode of locomotion, are possible causes of those rudimentary structures which the simplest vertebrate anima] presents, let us return to the region of established fact, and consider whether such actions and reactions as we actually witness, are adequate causes of those observed differentiations and integrations which distinguish the more-developed ver 200 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. tebrate animals. Let us see whether the theory of mechani- cal genesis afford us a deductive interpretation of the in- ductive generalizations. Before proceeding, we must note a process of functional adaptation which here co-operates with natural selection. I refer to the habitual formation of denser tissues at those parts of an organism which are exposed to the greatest strains—either compressions or tensions. Instances of harad- ening under compression are made familiar to us by the skin. We have the general contrast between the soft skin covering the body at large, and the indurated skin covering the inner surfaces of the hands and the soles of the feet. We have the fact that even within these areas the parts on which the pressure is habitually greatest, have the skin habitually thickest; and that in each person special points exposed to special pressures become specially dense—often as dense as horn. Further, we have the converse fact, that the skin of littie-used hands becomes abnormally thin—even losing, in places, that ribbed structure which distinguishes skin subject to rough usage. Of increased density directly following increased tension, the skeletons, whether of men or animals, furnish abundant evidence. Anatomists easily discriminate between the bones of a strong man and those of a weak man, by the greater development of those ridges and crests to which the muscles are attached ; and naturalists, on comparing the remains of domesticated animals with those of wild animals of the same species, find kindred differences. The first of these facts shows unmistakably the immediate effect of funetion on structure, and by obvious alliance with it the second may be held to do the same—both implying that the deposit of dense substance capable of great resist- ance, habitually takes place at points where the tension is excessive. Taking into account, then, this adaptive process, con- tinually aided by the survival of individuals in which it has taken place most rapidly, we may expect, on tracing up THE SHAPES OK VERTEBRATE SKELETONS. 201 the evolution of the vertebrate axis, to find that as the mus- cular power becomes greater there arise larger and harder masses of tissue, serving the muscles as points d’appui; and that these arise first in those places where the strains are greatest. Now this is just what we do find. The myocom- niata are so placed that their actions are likely to affect first that upper coat of the notochord, where there are found *quadrate masses of somewhat denser tissue,’ which ‘ seem faintly to represent neural spines,” even in the Amphiorus. It is by the development of the neural spines, and after them of the hzmal spines, that the segments of the vertebral column are first marked out; and under the increasing strain of more-developed myocommata, it is just these peripheral appendages of the vertebral segments that must be most subject to the forces which cause the formation of denser tissue. It follows from the mechanical hypothesis that as the muscular segmentation must begin externally and pro- gress inwards, so, too, must the vertebral segmentation. Besides thus finding reason for the fact that in fishes with wholly cartilaginous skeletons, the vertebral segments are indicated by these processes, while yet the notochord is un- segmented ; we find a like reason for the fact that the tran- sition from the less-dense cartilaginous skeleton to the more- dense osseous skeleton, pursues a parallel course. In the existing Lepidosiren, which by uniting certain piscine and amphibian characters betrays its close alliance with primitive types, the axial part of the vertebral column is unossified, while there is ossification of the peripheral parts. Similarly with numerous genera of fishes classed as paleozoic. The fossil remains of them show that while the neural and hzemal spines consisted of bone, the central parts of the vertebra were not bony. It may in some cases be noted, too, both in extant and in fossil forms, that while the ossification 1s com- plete at the outer extremities of the spines it is incomplete at their inner extremities—thus similarly implying centri- petal development. 202 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. § 257. After these explanations the process of eventual segmentation in the spinal axis itself, will be readily under- stood. The original cartilaginous rod has to maintain longi- tudinal rigidity while permitting lateral flexion. As fast as it becomes definitely marked out, it will begin to concentrate within itself a great part of those pressures and tensions eaused by transverse strains. As already said, it must be acted upon much in the same manner as a bow, though it is bent by forces acting in a more indirect way ; and lke a bow, it must, at each bend, have the substance of its convex side extended and the substance of its concave side compressed. So long as the vertebrate animal is small or inert, such a cartilaginous rod may have sufficient strength to withstand the muscular strains ; but, other things equal, the evolution of an animal that is large, or active, or both, implies mus- cular strains that must tend to cause modification in such a cartilaginous rod. The results of greater bulk and of greater vivacity may be best dealt with separately. As the animal increases in size, the rod will grow both longer and thicker. On looking back at the diagrams of forces caused by transverse strains, it will be seen that as the rod grows thicker, its outer parts must be exposed to more severe ten- sions and pressures, if the degree of bend is the same. It is doubtless true that when the fish or reptile, advancing by lateral undulations, becomes longer, the curvature assumed by the body at each movement becomes less; and that from this cause the outer parts of the notochord are, other things equal, less strained—the two changes thus partially neutral- izing one another. But other things are not equal. For while, supposing the shape of the body to remain con- stant, the force exerted in moving the body increases as the cubes of its dimensions, the sectional area of the notochord, on which fall the reactions of this exerted force, increases only as the squares of the dimensions: whence results an intenser stress upon its substance. Merely noting that the other varying facter—the resistance of the water—may here THE SHAPES OF VERTEBRATE SKELETONS. 202 be left out of the account (since for similar masses moving with equal velocities the resistances increase but little faster than the squares of the dimensions, which is the rate at which the sectional areas of the notochords increase) we see that aug- menting bulk, taken alone, involves but a moderate residuary increase of strain on each portion of the notochord; and this is probably the reason why it is possible for a large s/ug- gish fish like the Sturgeon, to retain the notochordal struc- ture. But now, passing to the effects of greater ac- tivity, a like dynamical inquiry at once shows us how rapidly the violence of the actions and reactions rises as the move- ments become more vivacious. In the first place, the resist- ance of a medium such as water increases as the square ol the velocity of the body moving through it; so that to maia- tain double the speed, a fish has to expend four times the energy. But the fish has to do more than this—it has to initiate this speed, or to impress on its mass the force umphed by this speed. Now the vis viva of a moving body varies as the square of the velocity ; whence it follows that the energy vequired to generate that vis viva is measured by the square of the velocity it produces. Consequently, did the fish put itself in motion dustantaneously, the expeuditure of energy in generating its own vis viva and simultaneously overcoming the resistance of the water, would vary as the fourth power of the velocity. But the fish cannot put itself in motion instantaneously—it must do it by increments; and thus it results that the amounts of the forces expended to give itself different velocities must be represented by some series 01 numbers falling between the squares and the fourth powers of those velocities. Were the increments slowly accumulated, the ratio of increasing effort would but little exceed the ratio of the squares; but whoever observes the sudden, convulsive action with which an alarmed fish darts out of a shallow into deep water, will see that the velocity is very rapidly gencr- ated, and that therefore the ratio of increasing effort probably exceeds the ratio of the squares very considerably. At any 204 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. rate it will be clear that the efforts made by fish in rushing upon vrey or escaping enemies (and it is these extreme efforts which here concern us) must, as fish become more active, rapidly exali tke strains to be borne by their motor organs ; and that of these strains, those which fall upon the noto- chord must be exalted in proportion to the rest. Thus the development of locomotive power, which survival of the fittest must tend in most cases to favour, involves such in- crease of stress on the primitive cartilaginous rod as will tend, other things equal, to cause its modification. What must its modification be ? Considering the compli- cation of the influences at work, conspiring, as above indi- cated, in various ways and degrees, we cannot expect to do more than form an idea of its average character. The nature of the changes which the notochord is likely to undergo, where greater bulk is accompanied by higher activity, is rudely indicated by Figs. 291, 292, and 293. The successively SI3 afl anim Soe al OR re are aaa -~ thicker lines represent the successively greater strains to which the outer layers of tissue are exposed ; and the widen- ing inter-spaces represent the greater extensions which they have to bear when they become convex, or else the greater gaps that must be formed in them. Had these outer layers to undergo extension only, as on the convex side, continued natural selection might result in the formation of a tissue elastic enough to admit of the requisite stretching. But at each alternate bend, these outer layers, becoming concave, are subject to increased compression—a compression which they cannot withstand if they have become simply more extensible. To withstand this greater compression they must become harder as well as more extensible. How are these two requirements to be reconciled? If, as facts war- rant us in supposing, a formation of denser substance occurs THE SHAPES OF VERTEBRATE SKELETONS. 205 ai those parts of the notochord where the strain is greatest ; it is clear that this formation cannot so go on as to produce a continuous mass: the perpetual flexions must prevent this. If matter that will not yield at each bend, is deposited while the bendings are continually taking place, the bendings will maintain certain places of discontinuity in the deposit— places at which the whole of the stretching consequent on each bend will be concentrated. And thus the tendency will be to form segments of hard tissue capable of great resistance to compression, with intervals filled by elastic tissue capable of great resistance to extension—a vertebral column. And now observe how the progress of ossification is just such as conforms to this view. That centripetal develop- ment of segments which holds of the vertebrate animal as a whole, as, if caused by transverse strains, it ought to do, and which holds of the vertebral column as a whole, as it ought to do, holds also of the central axis. On the mechanical hypothesis, the outer surface of the notochord should be the first part to undergo induration, and that division into seg- ments that must accompany induration. And accordingly, in a vertebral column of which the axis is beginning to ossify, the centrums consist of bony rings inclosing a still continuous rod of cartilage. § 258. Sundry other general facts which the comparative morphology of the Vertebrata discloses, supply further con- firmation. Let us take first the structure of the skull. On considering the arrangement of the muscular flakes, or myocommata, in any ordinary fish that comes to table—an arrangement already sketched out in the Amphiorus—it is not difficult to see that that portion of the body out of which the heal of the vertebrate animal becomes developed, is a por- tion which cannot subject itself to bendings in the same degree as the rest of the body. The muscles dev eloped there must be comparatively short, and much interfered with by the pre-existing orifices. Hence the cephalic part will not 206 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. partake in any considerable degree of the lateral undula- tions; and there will not tend to arise in it any such distinct segmentation as arises elsewhere. We have here, then, an explanation of the fact, that from the beginning the develop- ment of the head follows a course unlike that of the spinal column; and of the fact that the segmentation, so far as it can be traced in the head, is most readily to be traced in the occipital region and becomes lost in the region of the face. Still more significantly, we have an explanation of the fact that the base of the skull, answering to the front end of the notochord, never betrays any sign of segmentation. This, which is absolutely at variance with the hypothesis of the transcendental anatomists, is In complete harmony with the foregoing hypothesis. For if, as we have seen, the segmenta- tion consequent on mechanical actions and reactions must progress from without inwards, affecting last of all the axis; and if, as we have seen, the region of the head is so cireum- stanced that the causes of segmentation act but feebly even on its periphery; then, it is to be expected that its axis will not be segmented at all: that portion of the primitive notochord which is included in the head, having to un- dergo no lateral bendings, may ossify without division into segments. Of other incidental evidences suppled by comparative morphology, let me next refer to the supernumerary bones, which the theory of Goethe and Oken as elaborated by Prof. Owen, has to get rid of by gratuitous suppositions. In many fishes, for example, there are what have been called inter- neural spines and inter-hzmal spines. These cannot by any ingenuity be affiliated upon the archetypal vertebra, and they are therefore arbitrarily rejected as bones belonging to the exo-skeleton ; though in shape and texture they are similar to the spines between which they are placed. On the hy- pothesis of evolution, however, these additional bones are accounted for as arising under actions like those that gave origin to the bones adjacent to them. And similarly with THE SHAPES OF VERTEBRATE SKELETONS 207 such bones as those called sesamoid; together with cthers too numerous to name. Again, in the course of evolution, both as displayed 1 the Vertebrata generally and in each vertebrate embryo, three skeletons succeed one another—the membranous, the car- tilaginous, and the osseous. These substitutions take place variously and unsystematically. While one part of a skele- ton retains the membranous character, another part of the same skeleton has become cartilaginous. At the same time that certain components have become partially or completely ossified, other components continue cartilaginous or mem- branous. Further, though there is a general succession of these stages, the succession is not regularly maintained ; for in many cases bones are formed by the deposit of osseous matter in portions of the membranous skeleton, which thus do not pass through the cartilaginous stage. ‘“ Nor,” says Prof. Huxley, ‘‘does any one of these states ever completely obliterate its predecessor; more or less cartilage and mem- brane entering into the composition of the most completely ossified skull, and more or less membrane being discoverable in the most completely chondrtfied skull.” And then, too, the processes of chondrification and ossification often proceed with but little respect for the pre-existing divisions; but severally may result in the establishment of two parts where there was before one, or one where there were before two. Now wholly incongruous as these facts are with the hypothe- sis of an archetypal skeleton, they are quite congruous with the mechanical hypothesis. This shows us why, in the course of evolution, a feebly-resisting membranous structure came to be replaced by a more-resisting cartilaginous struc- ture, and this, again, by a still-more-resisting osseous struc- ture; aud why, therefore, these successive stages succeed one another, as it seems so superfluously, in the vertebrate em- bryo. And it further shows us why there is irregularity in the succession; seeing that the varying mechan.cal ac- tions to which the varying habits of the Vertebrata have 46 208 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. exposed them, have involved variations in the process of solidification. § 259. Of course the foregoing synthesis is to be taken simply as an adumbration of the process by which the verte- vrate structure may have arisen through the continued actions of known agencies. The motive for attempting it has been two-fold. Having, as before said, given reasons for con- cluding that the segments of a vertebrate animal are not homologous in the same sense as those of an annulose animal or a phzenogamic axis, it seemed needful to do something towards showing how they are otherwise to be accounted for ; and having here, for our general subject, the likenesses and differences among the parts of organisms, as determined by incident forces, it seemed out of the question to pass by the problem presented by the vertebrate skeleton. Leaving out all that is hypothetical, the general argument may be briefly presented thus:—The evolution from the simplest known vertebrate animal, of a powerful and active vertebrate animal, imples the development of a stronger internal fulcrum. The internal fulcrum cannot be made stronger without becoming more dense. And it cannot be- come more dense while retaining its lateral flexibility, with- out becoming divided into segments. Further, in conformity with the general principles thus far traced, these segments must be alike in proportion as the forces to which they are exposed are alike, and unlike in proportion as these forces are unlike; and so there necessarily results that unity in variety by which the vertebral column is from the beginning eharacterized. Once more, we see that the explanation ex- tends to those innumerable and more-marked divergences from homogeneity, which vertebree undergo in the various higher animals. Thus, the production of vertebra, the pro- duction of likenesses among vertebre, and the production of anlikenesses among vertebre, are interpretable as parts of THE SHAPES OF VERTEBRATE SKELETONS. 209 one general process, and as harmonizing with one general principle. Whether sufficient or insufficient, the explanation here given assigns causes of known kinds producing effects such as they are known to produce. It does not, as a solution of one mystery, offer another mystery of which no solution is to be asked. It does not allege a Platonic (td€a, or fictitious entity, which explains the vertebrate skeleton by absorbing into itself all the inexplicability. On the contrary, it assumes nothing beyond agencies by which structures in general are moulded—agencies by which these particular structures are, indeed, notoriously modifiable. An ascertained cause of certain traits in vertebree and other bones, it extends to all other traits of vertebrae; and at the time assimilates the morphological phenomena they present to much wider classes of morphological phenomena. CHAPTER XVI. THE SHAPES OF ANIMAL CELLS. § 260. AmonG animals as among plants, the laws of mor- phological differentiation must be conformed to by the mor- phological units, as well as by the larger parts and the wholes formed of them. It remains here to point out that the con- formity is traceable where the conditions are simple. In the shapes assumed by those rapidly-multiplying cells out of which each animal is developed, there is a conspicuous subordination to the surrounding actions. Fig. 294 represents the cellular embryonic mass that arises by repeated spontaneous fissions. In it we see how the cells, origin- ally spherical, are changed by- pressure against one another and against the linit- ing membrane; and how their likenesses and unlikenesses are determined by the likenesses and un- likenesses of the forces to which they are exposed. This fact may be thought scarcely worth pointing out. But it is worth pointing out, because what is here so obvious a con- sequence of mechanical actions, is in other cases a conse- guence of actions composite in their kinds and involved in their distribution. Just as the equalities and inequalities of dimensions among aggregated cells, are here caused by the equalities and inequalities among their mutual pressures in different directions ; so, though less manifestly, the equalities THE SHAPES OF ANIMAL CELLS. 211 and inequalities of dimensions among other aggregated cells, ars caused by the equalities and inequalities of the osmotic, chemical, thermal, and other forces besides the mechanical, to which their different positions subject them. § 261. This we shall readily see on observing the or- diaary structures of limiting membranes internal and ex- ternal. In Fig. 295, 15 shown a much-magnified section of a papilla from the gum. The cells of which it is composed originate in its deeper part; and are at first approximately spherical. Those of them which, as they develop, are thrust outwards by the new cells that continually take their places, have their shapes gradually changed. As they grow and successively advance to replace the superficial cells, when these exfoliate, they become exposed to forces that are more and more dif- ferent in the direction of the surface from what they are in lateral directions; and their dimensions gradually assume corresponding differences. Another species of limiting membrane, called cylinder- epithelium, is represented in Fig. 296. Though its mode of development is such as to render the shapes of its cells quite unlike those of pavement- epithelium, as the above-described kind is sometimes called, its cells equally exemplify the same general truth. For the chief contrast which each of them presents, is the contrast between its dimension at right angles to the surface of the membrane, and its dimension parallel to that surface. It is needless for our present purpose to examine further 212 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. the evidence furnished by Histology; nor, indeed, would further examination of this evidence be likely to yield de- finite results. In the cases given above we have marked differences among the incident forces; and therefore have a chance of finding, as we do find, relations between these and differences of form. But the cells composing masses of tissue are severally subject to forces that are indeterminate ; and therefore the interpretation of their shapes is imprac- ticable. It must suffice that so far as the facts go they are congruous with the hypothesis. CHAPTER. XVIT SUMMARY OF MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. ¢ 262. THar any formula should be capable of expressing & common character in the shapes of things so unlike as a tree and a cow, a flower and a centipede, is a remarkable fact; and is a fact which affords strong primé facie evidence of truth. For in proportion to the diversity and multiplicity of the cases to which any statement applies, is the probability that it sets forth the essential relations. Those connexions which remain constant under all varieties of manifestation, are most likely to be the causal connexions. Still higher will appear the likelihood of an alleged law of organic form possessing so great a comprehensiveness, when we remember that on the hypothesis of Evolution, there must exiss between all organisms and their environments, certain congruities expressible in terms of their actions and reac- tions. The forces being, on this hypothesis, the causes of the forms, it is inferable, a priori, that the forms must admit of zeneralization in terms of the forces; and hence, such a generalization arrived at @ posteriori, gains the further pro- bability due to fulfilment of anticipation. Nearer yet to certainty seems the conclusion thus reached, on finding that it does but assert in their special manifesta- tions, the laws of Evolution in general—the laws of that uni- versal re-distribution of matter and motion which holdthrough- out the totality of things, as well as in each of its parts. 214 MORPHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT. It will be useful to glance back over the various minor inferences arrived at, and contemplate them in their ensem- ble from these higher points of view. ' § 263. That process of integration which every plant dis- plays during its lfe, we found reason to think has gone on during the life of the vegetal kingdom as a whole. Proto- plasm into cells, cells into folia, folia into axes, axes into branched ccmbinations—such, in brief, are the stages passed through by every shrub; and such appear to have been the~ stages through which plants of successively-higher kinds have been evolved from lower kinds. Even among certain groups of plants now existing, we find aggregates of the first order passing through various gradations into aggregates of the second order—here forming small, incoherent, indefinite assemblages, and there forming large, definite, coherent fronds. Similar transitions are traceable through which these integrated aggregates of the second order pass into agerecates of the third order: in one species the unions of parent-fronds with the fronds that bud out from them, being temporary, and in another species such unions being longer continued; until, in species still higher, by a gemmation that is habitual and regular, there is produced a definitely- integrated aggregate of the third order—an axis bearing fronds or leaves. And even between this type and a type further compounded, a link occurs in the plants which cast off, in the shape of bulbils, some of the young axes they produce. As among plants, so among animals. Pee pee DIFFICULTIES OF INDUCTIVE VERIFICATION. 417 incubation, and the young afterwards. [Evidently all these differences affect the proportion between the total cost of re- production and the total cost of individuation, Whether the species is monogamous or polygamous, and whether there are marked differences of size or of structure between males and females, are also questions not to be over- looked. If there are many females to one male, the total quantity of assimilated matter devoted by each generation to the production of a new generation, is greater than if there ts a male to each female. Similarly, where the requirements are such that small males will suffice, the larger quantity of food left for the females, makes possible a greater surplus available for reproduction. And where, as in some of the Cirrhipedia, or such a parasite as Spherularia Bombi, the female is a thousand or many thousand times the size of the male, the reproductive capacity is almost doubled: the effect on the rate of multiplication being something like that which would result if any ordinary race could have all its males replaced by fertile females. Conversely, where the habits of the race render it needless that both sexes should have developed powers of locomotion—where, as in the Glow- worm and sundry Lepidoptera, the female is wingless while the male has wings—the cost of Individuation not being so great for the species as a whole, there arises a greater reserve for Genesis: the matter which would otherwise have gone to the production of wings and the using of them, may go to the production of ova. Other complications, as those which we see in Bees and Ants, might be dwelt on; but the foregoing will amply serve the intended purpose. § 333. To ascertain by comparison of cases whether Indi- viduation and Genesis vary inversely, is thus an under- taking so beset with difficulties, that we might despair of any satisfactory results, were not the relation too marked a one to be hidden even by all these complexities. Species are 418 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. so extremely contrasted in their degrees of evolution, and so extremely contrasted in their rates of multiplication, that the law of relation between these characters becomes unmis- takable when the evidence is looked at in its ensemble. This we shall soon find on ranging in order a number of typical cases. In doing this it will be convenient to neglect, temporarily, all unlikenesses among the circumstances in which organ- isms are placed. At the outset, we will turn our attention wholly to the antagonism displayed between the integrative process which results in individual evolution and the disinte- erative process which results in multiplication of individuals ; and this we will consider first as we see it under the several forms of agamogenesis, and then as we see it under the seve- ral forms of gamogenesis. We will next look at the anta- gonism between propagation and that evolution which is shown by increased complexity. And then we will consider the remaining phase of the antagonism, as it exists between the degree of fertility and the degree of evolution expressed by activity. Afterwards, passing to the varying relations between organisms and their environments, we will note how relative increase in the supply of food, or relative decrease in the quantity of force expended by the individual, entails relative increase in the quantity of force devoted to multiplication, and vice versd. Certain minor qualifications, together with sundry impor- tant corollaries, may then be entered upon. sate CHAPTER ‘V- ANTAGONISM BETWEEN GROWTH AND ASEXUAL GENESIS. § 334. When illustrating, in Part [V., the morphological] somposition of plants and animals, there were set down in groups, numerous facts which we have here to look at from another point of view. Then we saw how, by union of small simple aggregates, there are produced large compound agere- gates. Now we have to observe the reactive effect of this process on the relative numbers of the aggregates. Our present subject is the antagonism of Individuation and Genesis as seen under its simplest form, in the self-evident truth that the same quantity of matter may be divided into many small wholes or few large wholes; but that number negatives largeness and largeness negatives number. In setting down some examples, we may conveniently adopt the same arrangement as before. We will look at the facts as they are presented by vegetal ageregates of the first order, of the second order, and of the third order; and then as they are presented by animal aggregates of the same three orders. € 335. The ordinary unicellular plants are at once micro- scopic and enormously prolific. The often cited Protococeus nivalis, Which shows its immense powers of multiplication by reddening wide tracts of snow in a single night, does this by developing in its cavity a brood of young cells, which, being 420 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. presently set free by the bursting of the parent-cell, severally grow and quickly repeat the process. The like occurs among sundry of those kindred forms of minute A/ye which, by their enormous numbers, sometimes suddenly change pools to an opaque green. So, too, the Desmidiacee often multiply so ereatly as to colour the water; and among the Diatomacee the rate of genesis by self-division, ‘is something really extra- ordinary. So soon as a frustule is divided into two, each :f the latter at once proceeds with the act of self-division ; so that, to use Professor Smith’s approximative calculation of the possible rapidity of multiplication, supposing the process to occupy, in any single instance, twenty-four hours, ‘ we should have, as the progeny of a single frustule, the amazing number of one thousand millions in a single month.’” In these cases the multiplication is so carried on that the parent is lost in the offspring—the old individuality disappears either in the swarms of zoospores it dissolves into, or in the two or four new individualities simultaneously produced by fission. Vegetal aggregates of the first order, have, however, a form of agamogenesis in which the parent individuality is not lost: the young cells arise from the old cells by external gemmation. This process, too, repeated as it is at short intervals, results in immense fertility. The Yeast-fungus, which in a few hours thus propagates itself throughout a large mass of wort, offers a familiar example. In certain compound forms that must be classed as plants of the second order of aggregation, though very minute ones, self-division similarly increases the numbers at high rates. The Sarcina ventriculi, a parasitic plant that infests the stomach and swarms afresh as fast as previous swarms are vomited, shows us a spontaneous fission of clusters of cells. An allied mode of increase occurs in Gontum pectorale: each cell of the cluster resolving itself into a secondary cluster, and the secondary clusters then separating. ‘ Supposing, which is very probable, that a young Gonium after twenty - four hours is capable of development by fission, it follows SG 0 4,5 ogo GROWTH AND ASEXUAL GENESIS. 42] that under favourable conditions a single colony may on the second day develop 16, on the third 256, on the fourth 4,096, and at the end of a week 268,435,456 other organisms like itself.” In the Volvocine this continual dissolution ae a pr imary compound individual into secondary compound individuals, 1s carried on endogenously—the parent bursting to liberate the young ; and the numbers arising by this method, also are some- times so great as to tint large bodies of water. More fully established and or peel aggregates of the second order, such as the higher Miallosens and the lower Acrogens, do not sacrifice their individualities by fission ; but never- theless, by the kindred process of gemmation, are continually hindered in the increase of their individualities. The gemmee called tetraspores are cast off in great numbers by the marine Alge. Among those simple Jungermanniacee which consist of single fronds, the young ones that bud out grow for a time in connexion with their parents, send rootlets from their under sides into the soil, and presently separate themselves— a habit which augments the number of individuals in propor- tion as it checks their growths. Plants of the third order of composition, arising by arrest of this separation, exhibit a further corresponding decrease in the abundance of the aggregates formed. Acrogens of inferior types, in which the axes produced by integration of fronds are but small and feeble, are characterized by the habit of throwing off bulbils—bud-shaped axes which, falling and taking roct, add to the number of distinct individuals. This agamic multiplication, very general among the Mosses and their kindred, and not uncommon under a modified form in such higher types as the Ferns, many of which produce young ones from the surfaces of their fronds, becomes very unusual among Phenogams. The detachment of bulbils, though not unknown among them, is exceptional. And while it is true that some flowering plants, as the Strawberry, multiply by a process aliicd to gemmation, yet this is anything but characteristic of the class. A leading trait ot 422 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. these highest groups, to which the largest members of the vegetal kingdom belong, is that agamogenesis has so far ceased that it does not originate independent plants. Though the axes which, budding one out of another, compose a tree, are the equivalents of asexually-produced individuals; yet the asexual production of them stops short of separation. These vast integrations arise where spontaneous disintegra- tion, and the multiplication effected by it, have come to an end. Thus, not forgetting that certain Pheenogams, as Begonia phyllomaniaca, revert to quite primitive modes of increase, we may hold it as beyond question that while among the most minute plants asexual multiplication is universai, and pro- duces enormous numbers in short periods, it becomes step by step more restricted in range and frequency as we advance to large and compound plants; and disappears so generally from the largest, that its occurrence 1s regarded as anomalous. § 336. Parallel examples showing the inverse variation of growth and asexual genesis among animals, make clear the purely quantitative nature of this relation under its original form. Of the Ameba it is said that “ when a large variable process has been shot out far from the chief mass and become enlarged at the extremity, the expanded end retains its posi- tion, whilst the portion connecting it with the body becomes finer and finer by being withdrawn into the parent mass, until it at last breaks across, leaving a detached piece, which immediately on its own account shoots out processes, and manifests an independent existence. ‘This phenomenon is therefore one of simple detachment, and cannot rightly be called a process of fission.”” But it shows us, nevertheless, how the primordial form of multiplication is nothing more than a separation, instead of a continued union, of the grow- ing mass. Among the Protozcu, us among the Protophyta, there occurs that process by which the in- dividuality of the parent is wholly lost in producing offspring Pe Cs. -_ = GROWTH AND ASEXUAL GENESIS, 423 —the breaking up of the parental mass into a number of germs. An example is supplied by one of the lowest of the class—the Gregarina. This creature, which is nothing more than a minute spheroidal nucleated mass of protoplasm, having a structureless outer layer denser than the rest, but being without mouth or any organ, resolves itself into a multitude of still more minute masses, which when set free by bursting of the envelope, shortly become Ameba-form, and severally assuming the structure of the parent, go through the same course. Some of the Znfusoria, as for in- stance those of the genus Ko/poda, similarly become encysted and subsequently break up into young ones. The more familiar mode of increase among these apimal-aggre- gates of the first order, by fission, though it sacrifices the parent individuality by merging it in the individualities of the two produced, sacrifices it less completely than does the dissolution into a great number of germs. Occurring, how- ever, as this fission does, very frequently, and being com- pleted, in some cases that have been observed, in the course of half-an-hour, it results in immensely-rapid multiplication. If all its offspring survive, and continue dividing them- selves, a single Puramecium is said to be capable of thus originating 268 millions in the course of a month. Nor is this the greatest known rate of increase. Another animalcule, visible only under a high magnifying power, “ 1s calculated to generate 170 billions in four days.” And these enormous powers of propagation are accompanied by a minuteness so extreme, that of some species one drop of water would contain as many individuals as there are human beings on the Earth! Making allowance for exag;eration in these estimates, it 1s beyond question that among these smallest of animals the rate of asexual multiplication is by far the greatest; and this suffices for the purposes of the argument.* * That these estimated rates are not greater than is probable, may be inferred from such observations as that of Mr. Brightwell on the buds uf Zoothamnium. ‘At nine in the morning, one of these buds, or va, was 424 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. Of animal aggregates belonging to the second order, that multiply asexually with rapidity, the familiar Polypes furnish’ conspicuous examples. By gemmation in most cases, in other cases by fission, and in some cases by both, the agamogenesis is carried on among these tribes. As shown in Fig. 148, the budding of young ones from the parent Hydra is carried on so actively, that before the oldest of them is cast off half-a-dozen or more others have reacbed various stages of growth; and even while still attached, the first-formed of the group have commenced budding out from their sides a second generation of young ones’ In the Hydra tuba this gemmiparous multiplication is from time to time interrupted by a transverse splitting-up of the body into segments, which successively separate and swim away: the result of the two processes being, that in the course of a season there are produced from a single germ, great numbers of young Meduse, which are the adult or sexual forms of the species. Respecting Ccelenterate animals of this degree of composition, it may be added that when we ascend to the larger kinds we find asexual genesis far less active. Though comparisons are interfered with by differences of structure and mode of life, yet the contrasts are too striking to have their meanings much obscured. If, for instance, we take a solitary Actinozoon and a solitary Hydrozoon, we see that the relatively-great bulk of the first, goes along with a relatively-slow agamogenesis. The common Sea-anemones are but occasionally observed to undergo self-division: their numbers are not rapidly increased by this process. A higher class of secondary aggregates exemplifies the same observed fixed to the glass by a sheathed pedicle; a ciliary motion became perceptible at the top of the bulb; and at ten it had divided longitudinaily into two buds, each supported by a short stalk. The ciliary motion continued m the centre of each of these two buds, which by degrees expanded longitudi- pally, and at twelve had become four buds. By four in the afternoon, these tour buds had divided in like manner and increased to nine, with an elongated lootstalk, and interior contractile muscle.” GROWTH AND ASEXUAL GENESIS. 425 general truth with a difference. In the smaller members the agamogenesis is Incomplete, and in the larger it disappears. Each sub-section of the Mel/uscoida shows us this. The gemma- tion of the minute Polyzoa, though it does not end in the sepa- ration of the young individuals, habitually goes to the extent of producing families of partially-independent individuals ; but their near allies the B: achiopoda, which immensely exceed them in size, are solitary and not gemmiparous. So, too, is it with the Ascidioida. And then among the true Mollusca, including all the largest forms belonging to this sub-kingdom, no such thing is known as fission or gemmation. Take next the Annulosa, including under this title the Annuloida. When treating of morphological composition, reasons were given for the belief that the annulose animal is an aggregate of the third order, the segments of which, produced one from another by gemmation, originally became separate, as they still become in the _ cestoid Entozoa; but that by progressive integration, or arrested disintegration, there resulted a type in which many such segments were permanently united (S§ 205-7). Part of the evidence there assigned, is evidence to be here repeated in illustration of the direct antagonism of Growth and Asexual- Genesis. We saw how, among the lower Annelids, the string of segments produced by gemmation presently divides trans- versely into two strings; and how, in some cases, this resolu- tion of the elongating string of segments into groups that are to form separate individuals, goes on so actively that as many as six groups are found in different stages of progress to ultimate independence—a fact implying a high rate of fissiparous multiplication. Then we saw that, in the superior annulose types, distinguished in the mass by including thie larger species, fission does not occur. The higher Annelids do not propagate in this way; there is no known case of new individuals being so formed among the Muriapoda; nor do the Crustaceans afford us a single instance of this primordial mode of increase. It is, rndeed, true that while 426 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION, articulatz animals never multiply asexually after this simplest method, and while they are characterized in the mass by the cessation of agamogenesis of every kind, there nevertheless occur in a few of their small species, those higher forms of agamogenesis known as parthenogenesis, pseudo-partheno- genesis and internal metagenesis; and that by these some of them multiply very rapidly. Hereafter we shall find, in the interpretation of these anomalies. further support for tne general doctrine. To the above evidence has to be added that which the Vertebrata present. This may be very briefly summed up. On the one hand, this class, whether looked at in the aggre- gate or in its particular species, immensely exceeds all other classes in the sizes of its individuals; and on the other hand, agamogenesis under any form is absolutely unknown in it. § 337. Such are a few leading facts serving to show how deduction is inductively verified, in so far as the anta- gonism between Growth and Asexual Genesis is con- cerned. In whatever way we explain this opposition of the integrative and disintegrative processes, the facts and their implications remain the same. Indeed we need not commit ourselves to any hypothesis respecting the physical causation: it suffices to recognize the results under their most general aspects. We cannot help admitting there are at work these two antagonist tendencies to aggregation and separation; and we cannot help admitting that the propor- tion between the aggregative and separative tendencies, must in each case determine the relation between the increase in bulk of the individual and the increase of the race in number. The antithesis is as manifest @ posteriori as it is neces- sary ad priori. While the minutest organisms multiply asexually in their millions; while the small compound types next above them thus multiply in their thousands ; while larger and more compound types thus multiply in their hundreds and their tens; the largest types do not thus GROWTH AND ASEXUAL GENESIS, 427 multiply at all. Conversely, those which do not multiply asexually at all, are a billion or a million times the size of those which thus multiply with greatest rapidity; and are a thousand times, or a hundred times, or ten times the size of those which thus multiply with less and less rapidity. With- out saying that this inverse proportion is regular, which, as we shall hereafter see, it cannot be, we may unhesitatingly assert its average truth. That the smallest organisms habitually reproduce asexually with immense rapidity ; that the largest organisms never reproduce at all in this manner; and that between these extremes there is a general decrease of asexual reproduction along with an increase of bulk; are proposl- tions that admit of no dispute, CHAP THR: Wi: ANTAGONISM BETWEEN GROWTH AND SEXUAL GENESIS. § 338. In so far as it is a process of separation, sexual genesis is like asexual genesis; and is therefore, equaily with asexual genesis, opposed to that aggregation which results in growth. Whether a deduction is made from one parent or from two, whether it is made from any part of the body indifferently or from a specialized part, or whether it is made directly or indirectly, it remains in any case a deduction ; and in proportion as it is great, or frequent, or both, it must restrain the increase of the individual. Here we have to group together the leading illustrations of this truth. We will take them in the same order as before. § 339. The lowest vegetal forms, or rather, we may say, those forms which we cannot class as either distinctly vegetal or distinctly animal, show us a process of sexual multiplica- tion that differs much less from the asexual process than in the higher forms. The common character which distinguishes sexual from asexual genesis, is that the mass of protoplasm whence a new generation is to arise, has been produced by the anion of two portions of matter that were before more widely separated. I use this general expression, because ameng the simplest Alge, this is not invariably matter supplied by different individuals: certain Dictomacee exhibit within a single cell, the formation of a sporangium by a drawing GROWTH AND SEXUAL GENESIS. 429 together of the opposite halves of the endochrome into a ball. Mostly, however, sporangia are products of conjuga- tion. The endochromes of two cells unite to form the germ- mass; and these conjugating cells may be either entirely independent, as in many Desmidiacee and in the Palmelle ; or they may be two of the adjacent cells forming a thread, as in some Conjugatee ; or they may be cells belonging to adjacent threads, as in Zygnema. But whether it is originated by a single parent-cell, or by two parent-cells, the sporangium, after remaining quiescent until there recur the fit conditions for growth, breaks up into a multitude of spores, each of which produces an individual that multiplies asexually ; and the facet here to be noted is, that as the entire contents of the parent- cells unite to form the sporangium, their individualities are lost in the germs of a new generation. In these minute simple types, sexual propagation just as completely sacrifices the life of the parent or parents, as does that form of asexual propa- gation in which the endochrome resolves itself directly into zoospores. And in the one case as in the other, this sacrifice is the concomitant of a prodigious fertility. Slightly in advance of this, but still showing us an almost equal loss of parental life in the lives of offspring, is the process seen in such unicellular Alg@ as Hydrogastrum, and in minute Fungi of the same degree of composition. These exhibit a relatively- enormous development of the spore-producing part, and an almost entire absorption of the parental substance into it. As evidence of the resulting powers of multiplication, we have but to remember that the spread of mould over stale food, the rapid destruction of crops by mildew, and other kindred occurrences, are made possible by the incalculably numerous spores thus generated and universally dispersed. Plants a degree higher in composition, supply a parallel series of illustrations. We have among the larger Punyi, in which the reproductive apparatus is relatively so enormous as to constitute the ostensible plant, a similar subordination of the individual to the race, and a similarly-immense fertility. 430 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. Thus, as quoted by Dr. Carpenter, Fries says—“ in a single individual of Reticularia maxima, I have counted (calculated ?) 10,000,000 sporules.”” It needs but to note the clouds of particles, so minute as to look like smoke, which ripe puff- balls give off when they are burst, and then to remember that each particle is a potential fungus, to be impressed with the almost inconceivable powers 6f propagation which these plants possess. The Lichens, too, furnish examples. Though they are nothing like so prolific as the Fungi (the difference yielding, as we shall hereafter see, further support to the general argument), yet there is a great production of germs, and a proportionate sacrifice of the parental indi- viduality. Considerable areas of the frond here and there develop into apothecia and spermagonia, which resolve them- selves into sperm-cells and germ-cells. Some con- trasts presented by the higher A/ge may also be named as exemplifying the inverse proportion between the size of the individual and the extent of the generative structures. While in the smaller kinds relatively large portions of the fronds are transformed into reproductive elements, in the larger kinds these portions are relatively small: instance the Macrocystis pyrifera, a gigantic sea-weed, which sometimes attains a length of 1,500 feet, of which Dr. Carpenter remarks— “This development of the nutritive surface takes place at the expense of the fructifying apparatus, which is here quite subordinate.” When we turn to vegetal aggregates of the third order of composition, facts having the same meaning are conspicuous. On the average these higher plants are far larger than plants of a lower degree of composition; and on the average their rates of sexual reproduction are far less. Similarly if, among Acrogens, Endogens, and Exogens, we compare the smaller types with the larger, we find them proportionately more prolific. This is not manifest if we simply calculate the number of seeds ripened by an individual in a single season; but it becomes manifest if we take into account the GROWTH AND SEXUAL GENESIS. 431 further factor which here complicates the result—the age at which sexual genesis commences. The smaller Phznogams are mostly either annuals, or perennials that die down annually; and seeding as they do annually before their deaths, or the deaths of their reproductive parts, it results that in the course of a year, each gives origin to a multitude of potential plants, of which every one may the next year, if preserved, give origin to an equal multitude. Supposing but a hundred’ offspring to be produced the first year, ten thousand may be produced in the second year, a million in the third, a hundred millions in the fourth. Meanwhile, what has been the possible multiplication of a large Phe- nogam? While its small congener has been seeding and dying, and leaving multitudinous progeny to seed and die, it has simply been growing; and may so continue to grow for ten or a dozen years without bearing fruit. Before a Cocoa- nut tree has ripened its first cluster of nuts, the descendants of a wheat plant, supposing them all to survive and multiply, will have become numerous enough to occupy the whole surface of the Earth. So that though, when it begins to bear, a tree may annually shed as many seeds as agherb, yet in consequence of this delay in bearing, its fertility is incom- parably less; and its relatively-small fertility becomes still further reduced where, as in Lodoicea Sechellarum, the seeds take two years from the date of fertilization to the date of germination. § 340. Some observers state that in certain Protozoa there occurs a process of conjugation akin to that which the Protophytu exhibit—a coalescence of the substance of two Individuals to form a germ-mass. This has been alleged more especially of Actinophrys. The statement is question- able; but if proved true, then of the minute forms that appear to be more animal than vegetal in their characters, some have a mode of sexual multiplication by which the parents are sacrificed bodily in the production of a new 69 432 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. generation. A modified mode, apparently not fatal to the parents, has been observed in certain of the more developed Infusoria. Our knowledge of these microscopic types is, however, so rudimentary that evidence derived from them must. be taken with a qualification. Among small animal aggregates of the second order, the first to be considered are of course the Celenterata. A Hydra occasionally devotes a large part of its substance to sexual genesis. In the walls of its body groups of ova, or sperma- tozoa, or both, take their rise; and develop into masses greatly distorting the creature’s form, and leaving it greatly diminished when they escape. Here, however, gamogenesis ts ebviously supplementary to agamogenesis—the immensely rapid multiplication by budding continues as long as food is abundant and warmth sufficient, and is replaced by gamo- genesis only at the close of the season. A better example of the relation between small size and active gamo- genesis is supplied by the P/anaria, which does not multiply asexually with so much rapidity. The generative system is here enormous. Ova are developed all through the body, occupying everywhere the interspaces of the assimilative system; so that the animal may be said to consist of a part that absorbs nutriment and a part that transforms that nutri- ment into sperm-celis and germ-cells. Even saying nothing of the probably-early maturity of these animals, and there- fore frequent repetition of sexual multiplication, it is clear that their fertility must be very great. The Annulosa, including among them the inferior kindred types, have habits and conditions of life so various that only the broadest contrasts can be instanced in support of the pro- position before us. Of the microscopic forms belonging to this sub-kingdom, the Rotiferu may be named as having, along with small bulk, a great rate of sexual increase. Hyda- tina senta ‘‘ is capable of a four-fold propagation every twenty- four or thirty-hours, bringing forth in this time four ova, which grow from-the embryo to maturity, and exclude their GROWTH AND SEXUAL GENESIS. 433 fertile ova in the same period. The same individual, pro- ducing in ten days foriy eggs, developed with the rapidity above cited, this rate, raised to the tenth power, gives one million of individuals from one parent, on the eleventh day four millions, and on the twelfth day sixteen millions, and so en.” Ascending from this extreme, the differences of organization and activity greatly complicate the inverse variation of fertility and bulk. Bearing in mind, how- ever, that the rate of multiplication depends much less on the number of each brood than on the quickness with which maturity is reached and a new generation commenced, it will be obvious that though Annelids produce great numbers of ova, yet as they do this at comparatively long intervals, their rates of increase fall immensely below that just instanced in the Rotifers. And when at the other extreme we come to the large articulate animals, such as the Crab and the Lobster, the further diminution of fertility is seen in the still longer delay that occurs before each new generation begins to re- produce. . Perhaps the best examples are supplied by vertebrate animals, and especially those that are most familiar to us. Comparisons between Fishes are unsatisfactory, because of our ignorance of their histories. In some cases Fishes equal in bulk produce widely different numbers of eggs; as the Cod which spawns a million at once, and the Salmon by which nothing like so great a number is spawned. But then the eggs are very unlike in size; and if the ovaria of the two fishes be compared, the difference between their masses is comparatively moderate. There are, indeed, contrasts which seem at variance with the alleged relation; as that between the Cod and the Stickleback, which, though so much smaller, produces fewer ova. The Stickleback’s ova, however, are relatively large; and their total bulk bears as great a ratio ta the bulk of the Stickleback as does the bulk of the Cod’s ova to that of the Cod. Moreover, if, as is not improbable, the reproductive age is arrived at earlier by the Stickleback than 434 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION, by the Cod, the fertility of the species may ve greater not- withstanding the smaller number produced by each indi: vidual. Evidence that admits of being tolerably well disentangled is furnished by Birds. They differ but little in their grades of organization; and the habits of life throughout extensive groups of them are so similar, that comparisons may be fairly made. It is true that, as hereafter to be shown, the differences of expenditure which differences of bulk entail, have doubtless much to do with the differences of fertility. But we may set down under the present head some of those cases in which the activity, being relatively slight, does not greatly interfere with the relation we are considering ; similarly slight activities, the small produce more eggs than the large, and eggs that bear in their total mass a greater ratio to the mass of the parent. Consider, for example, the gallinaceous birds; which are like one another and unlike and may note that among such birds haying birds of most other groups in flying comparatively little. Taking first the wild members of this order, which rarely breed more than once in a season, we find that the Pheasant has from 6 to 10 eggs, the Black-cock from 5 to 10, the Grouse 8 to 12, the Partridge 10 to 15, the Quail still more, some- times reaching 20. Here the only exception to the relation between decreasing bulk and increasing number of eggs, occurs in the cases of the Pheasant and the Black-cock ; and it is to be remembered, in explanation, that the Pheasant inhabits a warmer region and is better fed—often artificially. If we pass to domesticated genera of the same order, we meet with parallel differences. From the numbers of eggs laid, little can be inferred; for under the favourable con- ditions artificially maintained, the laying is carried on inde- finitely. But though in the sizes of their broods the Turkey and the Fowl do not greatly differ, the Fowl begins breeding at a much earlier age than the Turkey, and produces broods more frequently: a considerably higher rate of multiplication being the result. Now these contrasts GRCWTH AND SEXUAL GENESIS. 43& among domestic creatures that are similarly conditioned, and closely-allied by constitution, may be held to show, more clearly than most other contrasts, the inverse varia- tion between bulk and sexual genesis; since here the cost of activity is diminished to a comparatively small _ amount. There is littl expenditure in flight—sometimes “almost none; and the expenditure in walking about is not great: there is more of standing than of actual movement. It is true that young Turkeys commence their existences as larger masses than chickens; but it is tolerably manifest that the total weight of the eggs produced by a Turkey during each season, bears a less ratio to the Lurkey’s weight, than the total weight of the eggs which a Hen produces during each season, bears to the Hen’s weight ; and this is the fairest way of making the comparison. The comparison so made shows a greater difference than appears likely to be due to the different costs of locomotion; con- sidering the inertness of the creatures. Remembering that the assimilating surface increases only as the squares of the dimensions, while the mass of the fabric to be built up by the absorbed nutriment increases as the cubes of the dimensions, it will be seen that the expense of growth becomes relatively greater with each increment of size; and that hence, of two similar creatures commencing hfe with different sizes, the larger one in reaching its superior adult bulk, will do this at a more than proportionate expense; and so will either be delayed in commencing its reproduction, or will have a diminished reserve for reproduction, or both. Other orders of Birds, active in their habits, show more markedly the con- nexion between augmenting mass and declining fertility. But in them the increasing cost of locomotion becomes an important, and probably the most important, factor. The evidence they furnish will therefore come better under another head. Contrasts among Mammals, like those which Birds present, have their meanings obscured by inequalities of the expenditure for motion. The smaller $36 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. fertility which habitually accompanies greater bulk, must in all cases be partly ascribed to this. Still, it may be well if we briefly note, for as much as they are worth, the broader contrasts. While a large Mammal bears but a single young one at a time, is several years before it commences doing this, and then repeats the reproducticn at long intervals; we find, as we descend to the smaller mem- bers of the class, a very early commencement of breeding, an increasing number at a birth, reaching in small Rodents to 10 or even more, and a much more frequent recurrence of broods: the combined result being a relatively prodigious fertility. If a specific comparison be desired between Mammals that are similar in constitution, in food, in con- ditions of life, and all other things but size, the Deer-tribe supplies it. While the large Red-deer has but one at a birth, the small Roe-deer has two at a birth. § 341. The antagonism between growth and sexual genesis, visible in these general contrasts, may also be traced in the history of each plant and animal. So familiar is the fact that sexual genesis does not occur early in life, and in all organisms which expend much begins only when the limit of size is nearly reached, that we do not sufficiently note its significance. It is a general physiological truth, however, that while the building-up of the individuai is going on rapidly, the reproductive organs remain imperfectly developed and inactive; and that the commencement of reproduction at once indicates a declining rate of growth, and becomes a cause of arresting growth. As was shown in § 78, the ex- ceptions to this rule are found where the limit of grewth is indefinite ; either because the organism expends little or nothing in action, or expends in action so moderate an amount that the supply of nutriment is never equilibrated by its expenditure. We will pass cver the inferior plants, and limiting our- selves to Phenogams, will not dwell on the less conspicu: wer GROWTH AND SEXUAL GENESIS, 437 ous evidence which the smaller types present. A few cases such as gardens supply will serve. All know that a Pear- tree continues to increase in size for years before it begins to bear; and that, producing but few pears at first, it is long before it fruits abundantly. A young Mulberry, branch- ing out luxuriantly season after season, but covered with nothing but leaves, at length blossoms sparingly, and sets some small and imperfect berries, which it drops while they are green; and it makes these futile attempts time after time before it succeeds in ripening any seeds. But these multi-axial plants, or aggregates of individuals some of which continue to grow while others become arrested and transformed into seed-bearers, show us the relation less de- finitely than certain plants that are substantially, if not literally, uni-axial. Of these the Cocoa-nut may be in- stanced. For some years it goes on shooting up without making any sign of becoming fertile. About the sixth year it flowers; but the flowers wither without result. In the seventh year it flowers and produces a few nuts; but these prove abortive and drop. In the eighth year it ripens a moderate number of nuts; and afterwards increases the number until, in the tenth year, it comes into full bearing. Meanwhile, from the time of its first flowering its growth begins to diminish, and goes on diminishing till the tenth year, when it ceases. Here we see the antagonism between growth and sexual genesis under both its aspects—see a struggle between self-evolution and race-evolution, in which the first for a time overcomes the last, and the last ultimately overcomes the first. The continued aggrandisement of the parent-individual makes abortive for two seasons the tendency to produce new individuals; and the tendency to produce new individuals, becoming more decided, stops any further agerandisement of the parent-individual. Parallel illustrations occur in the animal kingdom. The eggs laid by a pullet are relatively small and few. Similarly, it is alleged that, as a general rule, “a bitch has fewer 138 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. puppies at first, than afterwards.” According to Burdach, as quoted by Dr. Duncan, “the elk, the bear, &c., have at .first only a single young one, then they come to have most frequently two, and at last again only one. The young hamster produces only from three to six young ones, whilst that of a more advanced age produces from eight to sixteen. The same is true of the pig.” It is remarked by Buffon that when a sow of less than a year old has young, the number of the litter is small, and its members are feeble and even im- perfect. Here we have evidence that in animals growth checks sexual genesis. And then, conversely, we have evidence that sexual genesis checks growth. It is well known to breeders that if a filly is allowed to bear a foal, she is thereby prevented from reaching her proper size. And a like loss of perfection as an individual, is suffered by a cow that breeds too early. § 342. Notwithstanding the way in which the inverse variation of growth and sexual genesis is complicated with ‘other relations, its existence is thus, I think, sufficiently mani- fest. Individually, many of the foregoing instances are open to criticism, and have to be taken with qualifications; but when looked at in the mass, their meaning is beyond doubt. Comparisons between the largest with the smallest types, whether vegetal or animal, yield results that are unmis- takeable. On the one hand, remembering the fact that during its centuries of life an Oak does not produce as many acorns as a Fungus does spores in a single night, we see that the Fungus has a fertility exceeding that of the Oak in a de- gree literally beyond our powers of calculation or imagina- tion. When, on the other hand, taking a microscopic protophyte which has millions of descerfdants in a few days, we ask how many such would be required to build up the forest tree that is years before it drops a seed, we are met by a parallel difficulty in conceiving the number, if not in setting it down. Similarly, if we turn from the minute and GROWIH AND SEXUAL GENESIS. 439 prodigiously-fertile Rotifer, to the Klephant, which approaches thirty years before it bears a solitary young one, we find the connexions between small size and great fertility and between great size and small fertility, too intensely marked to be much disguised by the perturbing relations that have been indicated. Finally, as this induction, reached by a survey of organisms in general, 1s verified by observations on the rela- tion between decreasing growth and commencing reproduc- tion in individual organisms, we may, I think, consider the alleged antagonism as proved.* * When, after having held for some years the general doctrine elaborated in these chapters, I agreed, early in 1852, to prepare an outline of it for the West- minster Review, 1 consulted, among other works, the just-issued third edition of Dr. Carpenter’s Principles of Physiology, General and Comparative—seeking in it for facts illustrating the different degrees of fertility of ditferent organisms. I met with a passage, quoted above in §339, which seemed tacitly to assert that individual aggrandizement is at variance with the propagation of the race; but nowhere found a distinct enunciation of this truth. I did not then read the Chapter entitled ‘‘General View of the Functions,’’ which held out no promise of such evidence as I was looking for. But on since referring to this chapter, I discovered in it the definite statement that—‘‘ there is a certain degree of antagonism between the Nutritive and Reproductive functions, the one being executed at the expense of the other. The reproductive apparatus derives the materials of its operations through the nutritive system, and is entirely dependent upon it for the continuance of its function If, there- fore, it be in a state of excessive activity, it will necessarily draw off from the individual fabric some portion of the aliment destined for its maintenance. It may be universally observed that, when the nutritive functions are particularly active in supporting the individual, the reproductive system is in a corresponding degree undeveloped,—and vice versd.” —Principles af Phy- aology, Genvral and Comparyxtive, Third Editior, 1851, p. 592, CHAPTER VII. THE ANTAGONISM BETWEEN DEVELOPMENT AND GENESIS, ASEXUAL AND SEXUAL. § 348. By Development, as here to be dealt with apart from Growth, is meant increase of structure as distinguished from increase of mass. As was pointed out in § 50, this is the biological definition of the word. In the following sections, then, we have to note how complexity of organiza- tion is hindered by reproductive activity, and conversely. This relation partially coincides with that which we have just contemplated; for, as was shown in § 44, degree of growth is to a considerable extent dependent on degree of organization. But while the antagonism to be illustrated in this chapter, is much entangled with that illustrated in the last chapter, it may be so far separated as to be identified as an additional antagonism. Besides the direct opposition between that continual dis- integration which rapid genesis implies, and the fulfilment of that pre-requisite to extensive organization—the formation of an extensive aggregate, there 1s an indirect opposition which we may recognize under several aspects. The change from homogeneity to heterogeneity takes time ; and time taken in transforming a_ relatively-structureless mass into a de veloped individual, delays the period of reproduction. Usually this time is merged in that taken for growth; but certain cases of metamorphosis show us the one separate from the DEVELOPMENT AND GENESIS. 441 other. An insect, passing from its lowly-organized cater- pillar-stage into that of chrysalis, is afterwards a week, a fort- night, or a longer period in completing its structure: the re- commencement of genesis being by so much postponed, and the rate of multiplication therefore diminished. Further, that re-arrangement of substance which development implies, en- tails expenditure. The chrysalis loses weight in the course of its transformation; and that its loss is not loss of water only, may be inferred from the fact that it respires, and that respiration indicates consumption. Clearly the matter con- sumed, is, other things equal, a deduction from the surplus that may go to reproduction. Yet again, the more widely and completely an organic mass becomes diffe- rentiated, the smaller the portion of it which retains the re- latively-undifferentiated state that admits of being moulded into new individuals, or the germs of them. Protoplasm which has become specialized tissue, cannot be again generalized, and afterwards transformed into something else ; and hence the progress of structure in an organism, by diminishing the unstructured part, diminishes the amount available for making offspring. It is true that higher structure, like greater growth, may insure to a species advantages that eventually further its mul- tiplication—may give it access to larger supplies of food, or enable it to obtain food more economically; and we shall hereafter see how the inverse variation we are considering is thus qualified. But here we are concerned only with the necessary and direct effects; not with those that are con- tingent and remote. ‘These necessary and direct effects we will now look at as exemplified. § 344. Speaking generally, the simpler plants propagate both sexually and asexually; and, speaking comparatively, the complex plants propagate only sexually: their asexual propagation is usually incomplete—produces a united aggre- gate of individuals instead of numerous distinct individuals. 442 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. The Protophytes that perpetually subdivide, the merely« cellular A/ge that shed their tetraspores, the Acrogens that spontaneously separate their fronds and drop their gemma, show us an extra mode of multiplication which, among flower- ing plants, is exceptional. This extra mode of multiplication among these simpler plants, is made easy by their low de- velopment. Tetraspores arise only where the frond consists of untransformed cells; gemmee bud out and drop off only where the tissue is comparatively homogeneous. Should it be said that this is but another aspect of the antagonism already set forth, since these undeveloped forms are also the smalier forms; the reply is that though in part true, this is not wholly true. Various marine A/ge which propagate asexually, are larger than some Pheenogams which do not thus propagate. The objection that difference of medium vitiates this comparison, is met by the fact that it is the same among land-plants themselves. Sundry of the lowly-organized Liverworts that are habitually gemmiparous, exceed in size many flowering plants. And the Ferns show us agamic multiplication occurring in plants which, while they are inferior in complexity of structure, are superior in bulk to a great proportion of annual Endogens and Exogens. § 345. In the ability of the lowly-organized, or almost unorganized, sarcode of a Sponge, to transform itself into multitudes of gemmules, we have an instance of this same direct relation in the animal kingdom. Moreover, the instance yields very distinct proof of an antagonism between development and genesis, independent of the antagonism between growth and genesis; for the Sponge which thus multiplies itself asexually, as well as sexually, is far larger than hosts of more complex animals which do not multiply asexually. Once again may be cited the creature so often brought in evidence, the Hydra, us showing us how rapidity of agamic propagation is associated with inferiority of structure. Its DEVELOPMENT AND GENESIS. 443 power to produce young ones from nearly all parts of its body, is due to the comparative homogeneity of its body. In kindred but more-organized types, the gemmiparity is greatly restricted, or disappears. Among the free-swimming Hydrazoa, multiplication by budding, when it occurs at all, occurs only at special places. That increase of structure apart from increase of size, is here a cause of declining agamo- genesis, we may see in the contrast between the simple and the compound Hydroida; which last, along with more- differentiated tissues, show us a gemmation which does not go on all over the body of each polype, and much of which does not end in separation. It is, however, among the Annulosa that progressing organization is most conspicuously operative in diminishing agamogenesis. The segments or “somites” that compose an animal belonging to this class, are primordially alike; and, as before argued (§§ 205-7), are probably the homologues of what were originally independent individuals. The progress from the lower to the higher types of the class, is at once a progress towards types in which the strings of segments cease to undergo subdivision, and towards types in which the seg- ments, no longer alike in their structures and functions, have become physiologically integrated or mutually dependent. Already this group of cases has been named as illustrating the antagonism between growth and asexual genesis; but it is proper also to name it here; since, on the one hand, the greater size due to the ceasing of fission, is made possible only by the specialization of parts and the development of a co- ordinating apparatus to combine their actions, and since, on the other hand, specialization and co-ordination can advance only in proportion as fission ceases. § 346. The inverse variation of development and sexual genesis is by no means easy to follow. One or two facts indi cative of it may, however, be named. Pheenogams that have but little supporting tissue may 144 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. fairly be classed as structurally inferior to those provided with stems formed of woody fibres; for these imply additional dif- ferentiations, and constitute wider departures from the primi- tive type of vegetal tissue That the concomitant of this higher organization is a slower gamogenesis, scarcely needs pointing out. While the herbaceous annual is blossoming and ripening seed, the young tree is transforming its ori- ginally-succulent axis into dense fibrous substance ; and year by year the young tree expends in doing the like, nutriment which successive generations of the annual expend in fruit. Here the inverse relation is between sexual reproduction and complexity, and not between sexual reproduction and bulk seeing that besides seeding, the annual often grows to a size greater than that reached by the young infertile tree in several years. Proof of the antagonism between complexity and gamo- genesis in animals, is still more difficult to disentangle. Per- haps the evidence most to the point is furnished by the contrast between Man and certain other Mammals approaching to him in mass. To compare him with the domestic Sheep, which, though not very unlike in size, is relatively prolific, is objec- jectionable because of the relative inactivity of Sheep; and this, too, may be alleged as a reason why the Ox, though far more bulky, is also far more fertile, than Man. Further, agaiust a comparison with the Horse, which, while both larger and more prolific, is tolerably active, it may be urged that, in his case, and the cases of herbivorous creatures generally, the small exertion required to procure food, joined with the great ratio borne by the assimilative organs to the organs they have to build up and repair, vitiates the result. We may, however, fairly draw a parallel between Man anda large carnivore. The lion, superior in size, and perhaps equal in activity, has a digestive system not proportionately greater; and yet hasa higher rate of multiplication than Man. Here the only de- cided want of parity, besides that of crganization, is that of food. Possibly a carnivore gains an advantage in having a DEVELOPMENT AND GENESIS. 445 surplus nutriment consisting almost wholly of those nitro- genous materials from which the bodies of young ones are mainly formed. But, allowing for all other differences, it appears not improbable that the smallness of human fertility compared with the fertility of large feline animals, is due to the greater complexity of the human organization—more especially the organization of the nervous system. Taking degree of nervous organization as the chief correlative of mental capacity ; and remembering the physiological cost of that discipline whereby high mental capacity is reached; we may suspect that nervous organization is very expensive : the inference being that bringing it up to the level it reaches in Man, whose digestive system, by no means large, has at the same time to supply materials for general growth and daily waste, invoives a great retardation of maturity and sexnal genesis. | CHAPTER -Vilt ANTAGONISM BETWEEN EXPENDITURE AND GENESIS. § 847. Under this head we have to set down no evidence derived from the vegetal kingdom. Plants are not expenders of force in such degrees as to affect the general relations with which we are dealing. They have not to maintain a heat above that of their environment; nor have they to generate motion; and hence consumption for these two purposes does not diminish the stock of material that serves on the one hand for growth and on the other hand for propagation. It will be well, too, if we pass over the lower animals: especially those aquatic ones which, being nearly of the same temperature as the water, and nearly of the same specific gravity, lose but little im evolving motion, sensible and insensible. A further reason for excluding from con- sideration these inferior types, is, that we do not know enough of their rates of genesis to permit of our making, with any satisfaction, those involved comparisons here to be entered upon. The facts on which we must mainly depend are those to be gathered from terrestrial animals; and chiefly from those higher classes of them which are at the same time great expenders and have rates of multiplication about which our knowledge is tolerably definite. We will restrict ourselves, then, to the evidence which Birds and Mammals supply § 348. Satisfactory proof that loss of substance in the ——. EXPENDITURE AND GENESIS. 44? maintenance of heat diminishes the rapidity of propagation, is difficult to obtain. It is, indeed, obvious that the warm- blooded Vertebrata are less prolific than the cold-blooded ; but then they are at the same time more vivacious. Similarly, between Mammals and Birds (which are the warmer-biooded of the two) there is, other things equal, a parallel, though much smaller, difference; but here, too, the unlikenesses of muscular action complicate the evidence. Again, the annual return of generative activity has an average correspondence with the annual return of a warmer season, which, did it stand alone, might be taken as evidence that a diminished cost of heat-maintenance leads to such a surplus as makes reproduction possible. But then, this periodic rise of tem- perature is habitually accompanied by an increase in the quantity of food—a factor of equal or greater importance. We must be content, therefore, with such few special facts as admit of being disentangled. Certain of these we are introduced to by the general rela- tion last named—the habitual recurrence of genesis with the recurrence of spring. For in some cases a domesticated crea- ture has its supplies of food almost equalized; and hence the effect of varying nutrition may be in great part eliminated from the comparison. The common Fowl yields an illustra- tion. It is fed through the cold months, but nevertheless, in mid-winter, it either wholly leaves off laying or lays very sparingly. And then we have the further evidence that if it lays sparingly, it does so only on condition that the heat, as well as the food, is artificially maintained. Hens lay in cold weather only when they are kept warm. To which fact may be added the kindred one that “ when pigeons receive arti- ficial heat, they not only continue to hatch longer in autumn, but will recommence in spring sooner than they would other- wise do.” An analogous piece of evidence is that, in winter, inadequately-sheltered Cows either cease to give milk or give it in diminished quantity. For though giving milk is not the same thing as bearing a young one, yet, as milk 61 448 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. is part of the material from which a young one js built up, it is part of the outlay for reproductive purposes, and diminu- tion of it is a loss of reproductive power. Indeed the case aptly illustrates, under another aspect, the struggle between self-preservation and race-preservation. Maintenance of the cow’s life depends on maintenance of its heat; and main- tenance of its heat may entail such reduction in the supply of milk as to cause the death of the calf. Evidence derived from the habits of the same or allied genera in different climates, may naturally be looked for; but it is difficult to get, and it can scarcely be expected that the remaining conditions of existence will be so far similar as to allow of a fair comparison being made. The only illustrative facts I have met with which seem noteworthy, are some named by Mr. Gould in his work on The Birds of Australia. He says:—‘‘I must not omit to mention, too, the extraordinary fecundity which prevails in Australia, many of its smaller birds breeding three or four times in a season; but laying fewer eggs in the early spring when insect life is less developed, and a greater number later in the season, when the supply of insect food has become more abundant. I have also some reason to believe that the young of many spécies breed during the first season, for among others, I frequently found one section of the Honey-eaters (the Melithrepti) sitting upon eggs while still clothed in the brown dress of immaturity; and we know that such is the case with the introduced Gallinacee (or poultry) three or four generations of which have been often produced in the course of a year.” Though here Mr. Gould refers only to variation in the quantity of food as a cause of variation in the rate of multiplication, may we not suspect that the warmth is ¢ part-cause of the high rate which he describes as general ? § 349. Of the inverse variation between activity and genesis, we get clear proof. Let us begin with that which Birds furnish. EXPENDITURE AND GENESIS. 449 First we have the average contrast, already hinted, between the fertility of Birds and the fertility of Mammals. Compar- ing the large with the large and the small with the small, we see that creatures which continually go through the muscular exertion of sustaining themselves in the air and propelling themselves rapidly through it, are less prolific than creatures of equal weights which go though the smaller exertion of moving about over solid surfaces. Predatory Birds have fewer young ones than predatory Mammals of approximately the same sizes. If we compare Rooks with Rats, or Finches with Mice, we find like differences. And these differences are greater than at first appears. For whereas among Mammals a mother is able, unaided, to bear and suckle and rear half- way to maturity, a brood that probably weighs more in pro- portion than does the brood of a Bird; a Bird, or at least a Bird that flies much, is unable to do this. Both parents have to help; and this indicates that the margin for reproduction in each adult individual is smaller. Among Birds themselves occur contrasts which may be next considered. In the Raptorial class, various species of which, differing in their sizes, are similarly active in their habits, we see that the small are more prolific than the large. The Golden Eagle has usually 2 eggs: sometimes only 1. As we descend to the Kites and Falcons, the number is 2 or or 8, and 3 or 4. And when we come to the Sparrow-Hawk, 3 to 5 is the specified number. Similarly among the Owls: while the Great Eagle-Owl has 2 or 3 eggs, the comparatively small Common Owl has 4 or 5. As before hinted, it is im- possible to say what proportions of these differences are due to unlikenesses of bulk merely, and what proportions are duc to unlikenesses in the costs of locomotion. But we may fairly assume that the unlikenesses in the costs of locomotion are here the more important factors. Weights varying as the cubes of the dimensions, while muscular powers vary as the squares, the expense of flight increases more rapidly than the size increases ; and as motion through the air requires more 450 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. effort than motion on the ground, this geometric :1 progression tells more rapidly on Birds than on Mammals. Be this as it may, however, these contrasts support the argument; as do various others that may be setdown. The Finch family, for example, have broods averaging about 5 in number, and have vommonly 2 broods in the season; while in the Crow family the number of the brood is on the average less, and there is but one brood in a season. And then on descending to such small birds as the Wrens and the Tits, we have 8, 10, 12 to 15 eggs, and often two broods in the year. One of the best illustrations is furnished by the Swallow-tribe, throughout which there is little or no difference in mode of life or in food. The Sand- Martin, much the least of them, has usually 6 eggs; the Swallow, somewhat larger, has 4 or 5; and the Swifi, larger still, has but 2. Here we see a lower fertility associated in part with greater size, but associated still more con- spicuously with greater expenditure. For the difference of fertility is more than proportionate to the difference of bulk, as shown in other cases; and for this greater difference ther is the reason, that the Swift has to support not only the cost of propelling its larger mass through the air, but also the cost of propelling it at a higher velocity. Omitting much evidence of like nature, let us note that disclosed by comparisons of certain groups of birds with other groups. “Skulkers”’ is the descriptive title applied to the Water-Rail, the Corn-Crake, and their allies, which evade enemies by concealment—consequently expending but little in locomotion. These birds have relatively large broods—6 to 11, 8 to 12, &c. Not less instructive are the contrasts be- tween the Gallinaceous Birds and other Birds of like sizes but more active habits. The Partridge and the Wood-Pigeon are about equal in bulk, and have much the same food. Yet while the one has from 10 to 15 young ones, the other has but 2 young ones twice a-year: its annual reproduction is but one-third. It may be said that the ability of the Partridge to bring up so large a brood, is due to that habit of its tribe EXPENDITURE AND GENESIS. 451 which one of its names, “ Scrapers,” describes; and to the accompanying habit of the young, which begin to get their own living as soon as they are hatched: so saving the parents’ labour. Conversely, it may be sail that the inability of tie Pigeon to rear more than 2 ata time, is caused by the necessity of fetching everything they eat. But the alleged relation holds nevertheless. On the one hand, a great part of the feod which the Partridge chicks pick ap, is food which, in their absence, the mother would have picked up: though each chick costs her far less than a young Pigeon costs its parents, yet the whole of her chicks cost her a great deal in the shape of abstinence—an abstinence she can bear because she has to fly but little. On the other hand, the Pigeon’s habit of laying and hatching but two eggs, must not be referred to any fore- seen necessity of going through so much labour in supporting the young, but to a constitutional tendency established by such labour. This is proved by the curious fact that when do- mesticated, and saved from-such labour by artificial feeding, Pigeons, says Macgillivray, ‘‘are frequently seen sitting on eggs long before the former brood is able to leave the nest, so that the parent bird has at the same time young birds and eggs to take care of.” § 350. Made to illustrate the effect of activity on fertility, most comparisons among Mammals are objectionable: other cir- cumstances are not equal. A few, however, escape this criticism, One is that between the Hare and the Rabbit. These are closely-allied species of the same genus, similar in their diet but unlike in their expenditures for locomotion. The rela- tively-inert Rabbit has 5 to 8 young ones’ in a litter, and several litters a-year; while the relatively-active Hare has but 2 to 5d in a litter. This is not all. The Rabbit begins to breed at six months old; but a year elapses before the Ifare begins to breed. These two factors compounded, result in a difference of fertility far greater than can be ascribed to unlikeness of the two creatures in size. 452 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. Perhaps the most striking piece of evidence which Mam- mals furnish, is the extreme infertility of our common Bat. The Cheiroptera and the Rodentia are very similar in their internal structures. Diversity of constitution, therefore, cannot vitiate the comparison between Bats and Mice, which are about the same in size. Though their diets differ, the difference is in favour of the Bat: its food being exclusively animal while that of the Mouse is mainly vegetal. What now are their respective rates of genesis? The Mouse pro- duces many young at a time, reaching even 10 or 12; while the Bat produces only one at a time.- Whether the Bat repeats its one more frequently than the Mouse repeats its ten is not stated; but it is quite certain that even if it does so, the more frequent repetition cannot be such as to raise its fertility to anything like that of the Mouse. And this relatively-low rate of multiplication we may fairly ascribe to its relatively-high rate of expenditure. Here let us note, in passing, an interesting example of the way in which a species that has no specially-great power of self-preservation, while its power of multiplication is extremely small, nevertheless avoids extinction because it has to meet an unusually-small total of race-destroying forces. Leaving out parasites, the only enemy of the Bat is the Owl; and the Owl is sparingly distributed. § 351. These general evidences may be enforced by some special evidences. We have few opportunities of observing how, within the same species, variations of expenditure are related to variations of fertility. But a fact or two showing the connexion may be named. Doctor Duncan quotes a statement to the point respecting the breeding of dogs. Already in § 341 I have extracted a part of this statement, to the effect that before her growth is com- plete, a bitch bears at a birth fewer puppies than when she becomes full-grown. An accompanying allegation is, that her declining vigour is shown by a decrease in the number of EXPENDITURE AND GENESIS. 453 puppies contained in a litter,’ “ ending in one or two.” And then it is further alleged that, “as regards the amount of work a dog has to perform, so will the decline be rapid or gradual ; and hence, if a bitch is worked hard year after year, she will fail rapidly, and the diminution of her puppies will be accordingly; but if worked moderately and well kept, she will fail gradually, and the diminution will be less rapid.” In this place, more fitly than elsewhere, may be added a fact of like implication, though of a different order. Of course whether excessive expenditure be in the continual repairs of nervo-muscular tissues or in replacing other tissues, the re- active effects, if not quite the same, will be similar—there will be a decrease of the surplus available for genesis. If, then, in any animals there from time to time occur unusual outlays for self-maintenance, we may expect the periods of such outlays to be periods of diminished or arrested repro- duction. That they are so the moulting of birds shows us. When hens begin to moult they cease to lay. While they are expending so much in producing new clothing, they have nothing to expend for producing eggs. CHAPTER IX. COINCIDENCE BETWEEN HIGH NUTRITION AND GENESIS. § 352. Under this head may be grouped various facts which, in another way, tell the same tale as those contained in the last chapter. The evidence there put together went to show that increased cost of self-maintenance entailed de- creased power of propagation. The evidence to be set down here, will go to show that power of propagation is augmented by making self-maintenance unusually easy. For into this may be translated the effect of abundant food. To put the proposition more specifically—we have seen that after individual growth, development, and daily con- sumption have been provided for, the surplus nutriment measures the rate of multiplication. This surplus may be raised in amount by such changes in the environment as bring a larger supply of the materials or forces on which both parental life and the lives of offspring depend. Be there, or be there not, any expenditure, a higher nutrition will make possible a greater propagation. We may expect this to hold both of agamogenesis and of gamogenesis; and we shal] find that it does so. § 353. On multi-axial plants, the primary effect of surplus nutriment is a production of large and numerous leaf-shoots. How this asexual multiplication results from excessive nutri- tion, is well shown when the leading axis, ora chief branch, is broken off towards its extremity. The axillary buds below NUTRITION AND GENESIS. 455 the breakage quickly swell and burst into lateral shoots, which often put forth secondary shoots: two generations of agamic individuals arise where there probably would have been none but for the local abundance of sap, no longer drawn off. In like manner the abnormal agamogenesis which we have in proliferous flowers, is habitually accompanied by a general luxuriance, implying an unusual plethora. No less conclusive is the evidence furnished by agamo- genesis in animals. Sir John Dalyell, speaking of Hydra tuba, whose peculiar metagenesis he was the first to point out, says—“ It is singular how much propagation is promoted by abundant sustenance.”’ This Polype goes on budding-out young polypes from its sides, with a rapidity proportionate to the supply of materials. So, too, is it with the agamic reproduction of the Aphis. As cited by Professor Huxley, Kyber “ states that he raised viviparous broods of both this species ( Aphis Dianthi) and A. Rose for four consecutive years, without any intervention of males or oviparous females, and that the energy of the power of agamic reproduction was at the end of that period undiminished. ‘The rapidity of the agamic prolification throughout the whole period was directly proportional to the amount of warmth and food supplied.” In these cases the relation is not appreciably complicated by expenditure. The parent having reached its limit of growth, the absorbed food goes to asexual multiplication: scarcely any being deducted for the maintenance of parental life. § 354. The sexual multiplication of organisms under changed conditions, undergoes variations conforming to a parallel law. Cultivated plants and domesticated animals yield us proof of this. Facts showing that in cultivated plants, sexual genesis in- creases with nutrition, are obscured by facts showing that a less rapid asexual genesis, and an incipient sexual genesis, ac- company the fall from a high to a moderate nutrition. The confounding of these two relations has led to mistaken infer tz 456 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. ences. When treating of Genesis inductively, we reached the generalization that ‘ the products of a fertilized germ go on accumulating by simple growth, so long as the forces whence growth results are greatly in excess of the antagonist forces; but that when diminution of the one set of forces, or increase of the other, causes a considerable decline in this ex- cess, and an approach towards equilibrium, fertilized germs are again produced.” (§ 78.) It was pointed out that this holds of organisms which multiply by heterogenesis, as well as those which multiply by homogenesis. And plants were referred to as illustrating, both generally and locally, the decline of agamic multiplication and commencement of gamic multiplication, along with a lessening rate of nutrition. Now the many cases that are given of fruitfulness caused in trees by depletion, are really cases of this change from agamogenesis to gamogenesis; and simply go to prove that what would naturally arise when decreased peripheral growth had followed increased size, may be brought about artificially by diminishing the supply of materials for growth. Cramp- ing its roots in a pot, or cutting them, or ringing its branches, will make a tree bear very early: bringing about a pre- mature establishment of that relative innutrition which would have spontaneously arisen in course of time. Such facts by no means show that in plants, sexual genesis in- creases as nutrition diminishes. When it has once set in, sexual genesis is scanty or imperfect unless nutrition is good. Though the starved plant may blossom, yet many of its blossoms will fail; and such seeds as it produces will be ill- furnished with those enveloping structures and that store of albumen, &c., needed to give good chances of successful germi- nation—the number of surviving offspring will be diminished. Were it otherwise, the manuring of fields that are to bear seed-crops, would be not simply useless but injurious. Were it otherwise, dunging the roots of a fruit-tree would in all cases be impolitic; instead of being impolitic only where the growth of sexless axes is still luxuriant. Were it otherwise, . & NUTRITION AND GENESIS. 457 a tree which has borne a heavy crop, should, by the con- sequent depletion, be led to bear a still heavier crop next year; whereas it is apt to be wholly or partially barren next year—has to recover a state of tolerably-high nutrition before its sexual genesis again becomes large. But the best illustrations are those yielded by animals, in which we have, besides an increased supply of nutriment, a diminished expenditure. Two classes of comparisons, alike in their implications, may be made—comparisons between tame and wild animals of the same species or genus, and com- parisons between tame animals of the same species differently treated. To begin with Birds, let us first contrast the farm-yard Gallinacee with their kindred of the fields and woods. Not- withstanding their greater size, which, other things equal, should be accompanied by smaller fertility, the domesticated kinds have more numerous offspring thau the wild kinds. A Turkey has a dozen in a brood, while a Pheasant has from 6 to 10. Twice or thrice in a season, a Hen rears as many chickens as a Partridge rears once in a season. Anserine birds show us parallel differences. The Tame Goose sits on 12 or more eggs, but the Wild Goose sits on 5, 6, or 7; and these are noted as considerably smaller. It is the same with Ducks: the domesticated variety lays and hatches twice as many eggs as the wild variety. And the like holds of Pigeons. After remarking of the Columba livia that “in spring when they have plenty of corn to pick from the newly-sown fields, they begin to get fat and pair; and again, in harvest, when the corn is cut down,” Macgillivray goes on to say, that “ the same pair when tamed generally breed four times” in the year. That between different poultry-yards, in- equalities of fertility are caused by inequalities in the supplies of food, is a familiar truth. High feeding shows its effects not vnily in the continuous laying, but also in the sizes of the egos. Among directions’ given for obtaining eggs from pullets late in the year, it is especially insisted on that they 458 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION, shall havea generous diet. Respecting Pigeons Macgillivray writes :—“ that their breeding depends much on their having plenty of food to fatten them, seems, I think, evident from the circumstance that, when tamed, which they easily are, they are observed to breed in every month of the year. Ido not mean that the same pair will breed every month; but some in the flock, if well fed, will breed at any Season.” “ There may be added a fact of like meaning which partially-domesticated birds yield. The Sparrow is one of the Finch tribe that has taken to the neighbourhood of houses; and by its boldness secures food not available to its congeners. The result is that it has several broods in a sea- son, while its field-haunting kindred have none of them more than two broods, and some have only one. Equally clear proof that abundant nutriment raises the rate of multiplication, occurs among Mammals. Compare the litters of the Dog with the litters of the Wolf and the Fox. Whereas those of the one range in number from 6 to 14, the others contain respectively 5 or 6 or occasionally 7, and 4 or 5or rarely 6. Again, the wild Cat has 4 or 5 kittens ; but the tame Cat has 5 or 6 kittens 2 or 3 times a-year. So, too, is it with the Weasel tribe. The Stoat has 5 young ones once a-year. The Ferret has 2 litters yearly, each containing from 6 to 9; and this notwithstanding that it is the larger of the two. Perhaps the most striking contrast is that between the wild and tame varieties of the Pig. While-the one produces, according to its age, from ~4 to 8 or 10 young ones, once a year, the other produces sometimes as many as 17 in a litter; or, in other cases, will bring up 5 litters of 10 each in two years—a rate of reproduc- tion that is unparalleled in animals of as large a size. And let us not omit to note that this excessive fertility occurs where there is the greatest inactivity—where there is plenty to eat and nothing to do. There is no less distinct evidence that among domesticated Mammals themselves, the well-fed individuals are more prolific than NUTRITION AND GENESIS. 459 the ill-fed individuals. On the high and comparatively- infertile Cotswolds, it is unusual for Ewes to Lave twins; but they very commonly have twins in the adjacent rich valley of the Severn. Similarly, among the barren hills of the west of Scotland, two lambs will be borne by about one Ewe in twenty ; whereas in England, something like one Ewe in three will bear two lambs. Nay, in rich pastures, twins are more frequent than single births; and it occasionally happens that, after a genial autumn and consequent good grazing, a flock of Ewes will next spring yield double their number of jambs—the triplets balancing the uniparee. So direct is this relation, that I have heard a farmer assert his ability to fore- tell, from the high, medium, or low, condition of an Ewe in the autumn, whether she will next spring bear two, or one, or none. § 355. An objection must here be met. Many facts may be brought to prove that fatness is not accompar.ed by ferti- lity but by barrenness ; and the inference drawn is that high feeding is unfavourable to genesis. The premiss may be admitted while the conclusion is denied. There is a distinction between what may be called normal plethora, and an abnormal plethora, liable to be confounded with it. The one is a mark of constitutional wealth; but the other is a mark of constitutional poverty. Normal plethora is a superfluity of materials both for the building up of tissue and the evolution of force; and this is the plethora which we have found to be associated with unusual fecundity. Abnormal plethora, which, as truly alleged, is accompanied by infecundity, is a superfluity of force-evolving materials joined with either a positive or a relative deficiency of tiss1e- forming materials: the increased bulk indicating this state, being really the bulk of so much inert or dead matter. Note, first, a few of the facts which show us that obesity implies physiological impoverishment. Neither in brutes nor men does it ordinarily occur either +60 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. in youth or in that early maturity during which the vigour is the greatest and the digestion the best: it does not habitually accompany the highest power of taking up nutri- tive materials. When fatness arises in tke prime of life, whether from peculiarity of food or other circumstance, it.is not the sign of an increased total vitality. On the contrary, if great muscular action has to be gone through, the fat must be got rid of—either, as in a man, by training, or as in a horse that has grown bulky while out at grass, by putting him on such more nutritive diet as oats. The frequency of senile fatness, both in domesticated creatures and in ourselves, has a similar implication. Whether we consider the smaller ability of those who display it to with- stand large demands on their powers, or whether we consider the comparatively-inferior digestion common among them, we see that the increased size indicates, not an abundance of materials which the organism requires, but an abundance of materials which it does not require. Of like mean- ing is the fact that women who have had several children, and animals after they have gone on bearing young for some time, frequently become fat; and lose their fecundity as they do this. In such cases, the fatness is not to be taken as the cause of the infecundity; but the constitutional ex- haustion which the previous production of offspring has left, shows itself at once in the failing fecundity and the com- mencing fatness. There is yet another kind of evidence. Obesity not uncommonly sets in after the system has been subject to debilitating influences. Often a serious illness is followed by a corpulence to which there was previously no tendency. And the prolonged administration of mercury, con. stitutionally injurious as it is, sometimes produces a like effect. Closer inquiry verifies the conclusion to which these facts point. The microscope shows that along with the increase of bulk common in advanced life, there goes on what is called “ fatty degeneration :” oil-globules are deposited where there should be particles of flesh—or rather, we may say, the hydro- NUTRITION AND GENESIS, 46] carbonaceous molecules locally produced by decomposition of the nitrogenous molecules, have not been replaced by other nitrogenous molecules, as they should have been. This fatty degeneration is, indeed, a kind of local death. For so regard- ing it we have not simply the reason that an active substance has its place occupied by an inert substance; but we have the reason that the flesh of dead bodies, under certain conditions, is transfurmed into a fatty matter called adipocere. The infertility that accompanies fatness in domestic animals, has, however, other causes than that declining constitutional vigour which the fatness indicates. Being artificially fed, these animals cannot always obtain what their systems need. That which is given to them is often given expressly because of its fattening quality. And since the capacity of the digestive apparatus remains the same, the absorption of fat-producing materials in excess, implies defect in the abscrption of ma- terials from which the tissues are formed, and out of which young ones are built up. Moreover, this special feeding with a view to rapid and early fattening, continued as it is through generations, and accompanied as it is by a selection of individuals and varieties which fatten most readily, tends to establish a modified constitution, more fitted for producing fat and correspondaingly-less fitted for producing flesh—a constitution which, from this relatively-deficient ab- sorption of nitrogenous matters, is likely to become infertile ; as, indeed, these varieties generally become. Hence, no conclusions respecting the effects of high nutrition, pro- perly so called, can be drawn from cases of this kind. The cases are, in truth, of a kind that could not exist but for human agency. Under natural conditions no animal would diet itself in the way required to produce such results. And if it did, its race would quickly disappear.* * It is worth while inquiring whether unfitness of the food given to them, is not the chief cause of that sterility which, as Mr. Darwin says, ‘‘ is the great bar to the domestication of animals.” He remarks that ‘‘ when animals and plants are removed from their natural conditions, they are extremely liable to 462 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. There is yet another mode in which accumulation of fat diminishes fertility. Even supposing it unaccompanied by a smaller absorption of nitrogenous materials, it is still a cause of lessening the surplus of nitrogenous materials. For the repair of the motor tissues becomes more costly. Fat stored-up is weight to be carried. A creature loaded with inert matter must, other things equal, consume a greater amount of tissue-forming substances for keeping its loco- motive apparatus in order ; and thus expending more for self- maintenance can expend less for race-maintenance. Abnormal plethora is thus antagonistic to reproduction in a double way. It ordinarily implies a smaller absorption of tissue-forming matters, and an increased demand on the diminished supply. Hence fertility decreases in a geometrical progression. The counter-conclusion drawn from facts of this class, is, then, due to a misconception of their nature—a misconception arising partly from the circumstance that the increase of bulk produced by fat is somewhat like the increase of bulk which growth of tissues causes, and partly from the circumstance that abundance of good food normally produces a certain quantity of fat, which, within narrow limits, is a valuable store of force-evolving material. When, however, we limit the phrase high nutrition to its proper meaning—an abun- dance of, and due proportion among, all the substances which the organism needs—we find that, other things equal, fertility always increases as nutrition increases. And we see that these apparently-exceptional cases, are cases that really show us the same thing; since they are cases of relative innutrition. have their reproductive systems sericusly affected.” Possibly the relative or absolute arrest of genesis, is less due to a direct effect on the reproductive sys- tem, than to a changed nutrition of which the reproductive system most clearly shows the results. The matters required for forming an embryo are ina greater proportion nitrogenous than are the matters required for maintain- ing an adult. Hence, an animal forced to live on insufficiently-nitrogenized food, may have its surplus for reproduction cut off, but still have a sufficiency to keep its own tissues in repair, and appear to be in good health—meanwhile increasing in bulk from excess of the non-nitrogenc 1s matters it cats. CHAPTER X. SPECIALITIES OF THESE RELATIONS. § 356. Tests of the general doctrines set forth in preceding chapters, are afforded by organisms having modes of life that diverge widely from ordinary modes. Here, as elsewhere, aberrant cases yield crucial proofs. If certain organisms are so circumstanced that highly- nutritive matter is supplied to them without stint, and they nave nothing to do but absorb it, we may infer that their powers cf propagation will be enormous. If there are classes of creatures that expend very little for self-support in comparison with allied creatures, a relatively extreme prolificness may be expected of them. Or if, again, we find species presenting the peculiarity that while some of their individuals have much to do and little to eat, others of their individuals have much to eat and little to do, we may look for great fertility in these last and comparative infertility or barrenness in the first. These several anticipations we shall find completely verified. § 357. Plants which, like the Rafflesiacee, carry their para- sitism to the extent of living on the juices they absorb from other plants, exhibit one of these relations in the vegetal kingdom. In them the organs for self-support being need- less, are rudimentary; and the parts directly or indirectly 62 164 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION concerned in the production and distribution of germs, con- stitute the mass of the organism. That small ratio which the race-preserving structures bear to the self-preserving structures in ordinary Pheenogams, is, in these Phrenogams, inverted. A like relation occurs in the common Dodder. There may be added a kindred piece of evidence which the Fungi present. Those of them which grow on living plants, repeat the above connection completely; and those of them which, though not parasitic, nevertheless subsist on organized materials previously elaborated by other plants, substantially repeat it. The spore-producing part is relatively enormous: and the fertility is far greater than that of Cryptogams of like sizes, which have to form for themselves the organic com- pounds of which they and their germs consist. § 358. The same lesson is taught us by amimal-parasites. Along with the decreased cost of Individuation, they similarly show us an increased expenditure for Genesis; and they show us this in the most striking manner where the deviation from ordinary conditions of life is the greatest. Take, among the Epizoa, such an instance as the Nicothe. Belonging to the Entomostraca, both males and females of this species are, in their early days, similar to their allies; and the males continue so throughout life. Each female, however, presently fixes herself on the skin of an aquatic animal, where she sits and sucks its Juices, eniarges rapidly, and undergoes an extreme distortion from the growth of the ovaries. These, bulging.out from her sides, become lateral sacs, each of which attains something like three times her size; and then a further distortion is produced by two vast ego-bags, severally larger than herself, which also are formed and become pendant. So that the germ-producing organs and their contents, eventually acquire a total bulk some eight or ten times that of the rest of the body. Numerous species of this type and habit, repeat this relation between a life of in- action with high feeding, and an enormous rate of genesis. SPECIALITIES OF THESE RELATIONS. 465 Eintozoa yield us many examples of this causal relation, raised to a still higher degree. The Gordius, or Hair-worm, is a creature which, finding its way when young into the body of an insect, there grows rapidly, and afterwards emerg- ing to breed, laysas many as 8,000,000 eggs in less than a day. Similarly with the larger types that infest the higher ‘animals. It has been calculated by Dr. Eschricht, as quoted by Professor Owen, that there are “64,000,000 of ova in the mature female Ascaris Lumbricoides.”” Even a still greater fertility occurs among the cestoid Hiztozoa. Immersed as a Tape-worm is in nutritive liquid, which it absorbs through its integument, it requires no digestive apparatus. The room which one would occupy, and the materials it would use up, are therefore available for germ-producing organs, which nearly fill each segment: each segment, sexually complete in itself, is little else than an enormous reproductive system, with just enough of other structures to bind it together. Remembering that the Tape-worm, retaining its hold, con- tinues to bud-out such segments as fast as the fully-developed ones are cast off, and goes on doing this as long as the infested individual lives; we see that here, where there is no ex- penditure, where the cost of individuation is reduced to the greatest extent while the nutrition is the highest possible, the degree of fertility reaches its extreme. These Entozoa yield us further interesting evidence. Of their various species, most if not all undergo passive migration from animal to animal before they become nature. Usually, the form assumed in the body of the first host, is devoid of all that part in which the reproductive structures take their rise ; and this part grows and develops reproductive structures, only in some predatory animal to which its first host falls a sacrifce. Occasionally, however, the egg gives origin to the sexua. form in the animal that originally swallowed it, but the development remains incomplete—there is no sexual genesis, no formation of eggs in the rudimentary segments. That these may become fertile, it is needful, as before, for the 166 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. containing animal to be devoured ; so that the imperfect Tape worm may find its way into the intestine of a higher animal. Thus the Bothriocephalus solidus, found in the abdominal cavity of the Stickleback, is barren while it remains there ; but if the Stickleback is eaten by a Water-fowl, the reproductive system of the transferred Bothriocephalus becomes developed and active. So, too, a kind of Tape-worm which remains infertile while in the intestine of a Mouse, becomes fertile in the in- testine of a Cat that devours the mouse. May we not regard these facts as again showing the dependence of fertility on nutrition ? Barrenness here accompanies conditions unfavour- able to the absorption of nutriment; and it gives way to fecundity where nutriment is large in quantity and superior in quality. § 359. Extremely significant are those cases of partial reversion to primitive forms of genesis, that occur under special conditions in some of the higher Annulosa, I refer to the pseudo-parthenogenesis and metagenesis in Insects. Under what conditions do the Aphides exhibit this strange deviation from the habits of their order? Why among them should imperfect females produce, agamically, others like themselves, generation after generation, with great rapidity ? There is the obvious explanation that they get plenty of easily-assimilated food without exertion. Piercing the tender coats of young shoots, they sit and suek—appropriating the nitrogenous elements of the sap and ejecting its saccharine matter as “honey dew.” Along with a sluggishness strongly contrasted with the activity of their allies—along with a very low rate of consumption and a correlative degra- dation of structure; we have here a retrogression to asexual genesis, and a greatly-increased rate of multiplication. The recently-discovered instance of internal metagenesis in the maggots of certain Flies has a like meaning. In- credible as it at first seemed to naturalists, it is now proved that the Cecydomia-larva develops in its interior a brood of larva SPECIALITIES OF THESE RELATIONS. 467 of like structure with itself. In this case, asin the last, abun dant food is combined with low expenditure. These larve are found in such habitats as the refuse of beet-root-sugar fac- tories—masses of nitrogenous débris remaining: after the extraction of the saccharine matter. Each larva has a practically-unlimited supply of sustenance imbedding it on all sides. It is true that some other maggots, as those of the Flesh-fly, are similarly, or still better, circumstanced; and, it may be said, ought therefore to have the same habit. But this does not necessarily follow. Survival of the fittest will determine whether such specially-favourable conditions result in the agerandisement of the individual or in the multiplication of the race. And in the case of the Flesh-fly, there is a reason why greater individuation rather than more rapid genesis will occur. For a decomposing animal body lasts so short a time, that were Flesh-fly larve to multiply agamically, the second generation would die from the disappearance of their food. Hence, individuals in which the excessive nutrition led to internal metagenesis, would leave no posterity; and natural selection would establish the variety in which greater growth resulted. All which the argument requires is, that when such reversion to agamogenesis does take place, it shall be where the food is unusually abundant and the expenditure unusually small; and this the cases instanced go to show. § 360. The physiological lesson taught us by Bees and Ants, not quite harmonizing with the moral lesson they are supposed to teach, is that highly-fed idleness is favourable to fertility, and that excessive industry has barrenness for its concomitant. The egg of a Bee develops into a small barren female or into a large fertile female, according to the supply of food given to the larva hatched from it. We here see that the germ-producing action is an overflow of the surplus remain- ing after completion of the individual; and that the lower {68 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. feeding which the larva of a working Bee has, results in a dwarfing of the adult and an arrested development of the generative organs. Further, we have the fact that the con- dition under which the perfect female, or mother-Bee, goes on, unlike insects in general, laying eggs continuously, is that she has plenty of food brought to her, is kept warm, and goes through no considerable exertion. While, contrariwise, it is to be noted that the infertility of the workers, is asso- ciated with the ceaseless labour of bringing materials for the combs and building them, as well as the labour of feeding the queen, the larva, and themselves. Ants, and especially some of the tropical kinds, show us these relations in an exaggerated form. The differ- ence of bulk between the fecund and infecund females is immensely greater. The mother-Ant has the reproductive system so enormously developed, that the remainder of her body is relatively insignificant. Entirely incapable of loco- motion, she is unable to deposit her eggs in the places where they are to be hatched; so that they have to be carried away by the workers as fast as they are extruded. Her life is thus reduced substantially to that of a parasite—an absorption of abundant food supplied gratis, a total absence of expendi- ture, and a consequent excessive rate of genesis. ‘ The queen-ant of the African Termites lays 80,000 eggs in twenty- four hours.” § 361. It may be needful to say that these exceptional relations cannot be ascribed to the assigned causes acting alone. The extreme fertility which, among parasites and social insects, accompanies extremely high feeding, and an expenditure reduced nearly to zero, presupposes typical struc-. tures and tendencies of suitable kinds; and these are not directly accounted for. On creatures otherwise organized, unlimited supplies of food and total inactivity are not fol- lowed by such results. There of course requires a consti- tution fitted to the special conditions; and the evolution of SPECIALITIES OF THESE RELATIONS. 468 this cannot be due simply to plethora joined with rest. These cases are given as illustrating the conditions under which extreme exaltations of fertility become possible. Their mean- ings, thus limited, are clear, and completely to the point. We see in them that the devotion of nutriment to race-preserva- tion, is carried furthest where the cost of self-preservation is reduced to a minimum; and, conversely, that nothing is devoted directly to race-preservation by individuals on which falls an excessive expenditure for self-preservation and preservation of other’s offspring, CHAPTER XI. INTERPRETATION AND QUALIFICATION. + § 362. Considering the difficulties of inductive verification, we have, I think, as clear a correspondence between the a priori and a posteriori conclusions, as can be expected. The many factors co-operating to bring about the result in every case, are so variable in their absolute and relative amounts, that we can rarely disentangle the effect of each one; and have usually to be content with qualified inferences. Though in the mass, organisms show us an unmistakable relation between great size andsmall fertility ; yet special comparisons among them are nearly always partially vitiated by differ- ences of structure, differences of nutrition, differences of expenditure. Though it is beyond question that the more complex organisms are the less prolific; yet as complexity has a certain general connexion with bulk, and in animals with expenditure, we cannot often identify its results as inde- pendent of these. And, similarly, though the creatures that waste much matter in producing motion, sensible and insen- sible, have lower rates of multiplication than those which waste less; yet, as the creatures which waste much are generally larger and more complex, we are again met by an obstacle which limits our comparisons, and compels us to accept conclusions less definite than are desirable. Such difficulties arise, however, only when we endeavour, as in foregoing chapters, to prove the inverse variation INITERPRELATION AND QUALIFICATION. 471 between Genesis and each separate element of Individuation —growth development, activity. We are scarcely at all hampered by qualifications when, from contemplating these special relations, we return to the general relation. The antagonism between Individuation and Genesis, is shown by all the facts that have been grouped under each head. We have seen that in ascending from the lowest to the highest types, there is a decrease of fertility so great as to be abso- lutely inconceivable, and even inexpressible by figures; and whether the superiority of type consists in relative largeness, in greater complexity, in higher activity, or in some or all of these combined, matters not to the ultimate inference. The broad fact, enough for us here, is that organisms in which the integration and differentiation of matter and motion have been carried furthest, are those in which the rate of multipli- cation has fallen lowest. How much of the decline of repro- ductive power is due to the greater integration of matter, how much to its greater differentiation, how much to the larger amounts of integrated and differentiated motions gene- rated, it may be impossible to say; and it is not needful to say. These are all elements of a higher degree of life, an augmented ability to maintain the organic equilibrium amid environing actions—an increased power of self-preservation ; and we find their invariable accompaniment to be, a dimi- nished expenditure of matter, or motion, or both, in race- preservation. In brief, then, examination of the evidence shows that there does exist that relation which we inferred must exist. Arguing from general data, we saw that for the maintenance of a species, the ability to produce offspring must be great, in proportion as the ability of the individuals to contend witk destroying forces is small; and conversely. Arguing from other general data, we saw that, derived as the self-sustain- ing and race-sustaining forces are from a common stock of force, it necessarily happens that, other things equal, increase of one involves decrease of the other. And then, turning t72 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. to special facts, we have found that this inverse variation is clearly traceable throughout both the animal and vegetal kingdoms. We may therefore set it down as a law, that every higher degree of organic evolution, has for its con- comitant a lower degree of that peculiar organic dissolution which is seen in the production of new organisms. § 363. Something remains to be said in reply to the in- quiry—how is the ratio between Individuation and Genesis established in each case? This inquiry has been but partially answered in the course of the foregoing argument. All specialities of the reproductive process are due to the natural selection of favourable variations. Whether a creature lays a few large eggs or many small ones equal in weight to the few large, is not determined by any physiological neces- sity : here the only assignable cause is the survival of varieties in which the matter devoted to reproduction, happens to be divided into portions of such size and number as most to favour multiplication. Whether in any case there are frequent small broods or larger broods at longer intervals, depends wholly on the constitutional peculiarity that has arisen from the dying out of families in which the sizes and intervals of the broods were least suited to the conditions of life. Whether a species of animal produces many offspring of which it takes no care or a few of which it takes much care—that is, whether its reproductive surplus is laid out wholly in germs or partly in germs and partly in labour on their behalf—must have been decided by that moulding of constitution to conditions, slowly effected through the more frequent preservation of descendants from those whose re- productive habits were best adapted to the circum- stances of the species. Given a certain surplus available for race-preservation, and it is clear that by indirect equilibration only, can there be established the more or less peculiar distribution of this surplus which we see iu each case. Obviously, too, survival of the fittest INTERPRETATION AND QUALIFICATION. 473 has a share in determining the proportion between the amount of matter that goes to Individuation and the amount that goes to Genesis. Whether the interests of the species are most subserved by a higher evolution of the. individual joined with a diminished fertility, or by a lower evolution of the individual joined with an increased fertility, are ques- tions ever being experimentally answered. If the more- developed and less-prolific variety has a greater number of survivors, it becomes established and predominant. If, con- trariwise, the conditions of life being simple, the larger or more-organized individuals gain nothing by their greater size or better organization ; then the greater fertility of the less evolved ones, will insure to their descendants an increasing predominance. But direct equilibration all along maintains the limits within which indirect equilibration thus works. The necessary antagonism we have traced, rigidly restricts the changes that natural selection can produce, under given con- ditions, in either direction. A greater demand for Individua- tion, be it a demand caused by some spontaneous variation or by an adaptive increase of structure and function, inevitably diminishes the supply for Genesis; and natural selection cannot, other things remaining the same, restore the rate of Genesis while the higher Individuation is maintained. Con- versely, survival of the fittest, acting on a species that has, by spontaneous variation or otherwise, become more prolific, cannot again raise its lowered Individuation, so long as every- thing else continues constant. § 364. Here, however, a qualification must be made. It was parenthetically remarked in § 327 that the inverse varia- tion between Individuation and Genesis is not exact; and it was hinted that a slight modification of statement would be requisite at a more advanced stage of the argument. We have now reached the proper place for specifying this modification. 474 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. Each increment of evolution entails a decrement of re production that is not accurately proportionate, but somewhat less than proportionate. The gain in the one direction is not » wholly canceled by a loss in the other direction, but only partially canceled: leaving a margin of profit to the species. Though augmented power of self-maintenance habitually necessitates diminished power of race-propagation, yet the product of the two factors is greatér than before ; so that the forces preservative of race become, thereafter, in excess of the forces destructive of race, and the race spreads. We shall soon see why this happens. Each advance in evolution implies an economy. That any increase in bulk, or structure, or activity, may become esta- blished, the life of the organism must be to some extent facilitated by the change—the cost of self-support must be, on the average, reduced. If the greater complexity, or the larger size, or the more agile movement, entails on the in- dividual an outlay that is not repaid in food more-easily obtained, or danger more-easily escaped ; then the individual will be at a relative disadvantage, and its diminished posterity will disappear. If the extra outlay is but just made good by the extra advantage, the modified individual will not sur- vive longer, or leave more descendants, than the unmodified individuals. Consequently, it is only when the expense of greater individuation is out-balanced by a subsequent saving, that it can tend to subserve the preservation of the indi- vidual; or, by implication, the preservation of the race The vital capital invested in the alteration must bring a more than equivalent return. A few instances will show that, whether the change results from direct equilibration or from indirect equilibration, this must happen. Suppose a creature takes to performing some act in an un- usual way—leaps where ordinarily its kindred crawl, eludes pursuit by diving instead of, like others of its kind, by swim- ming along the surface, escapes by doubling instead of by sheer speed. Clearly, perseverance in the modified habit will, other INTERPRETATION AND QUALIFICATION. 479 things equal, imply that it takes less effort. The creature’s sensations will ever prompt desistance from the more laborious course; and hence a congenital habit is not likely to be diverged from unless an economy of force is achieved by the divergence. Assuming, then, that the new method has no advantage over the old in directly diminishing the chances of death, the establishment of it, and of the structural complications involved, nevertheless implies a physiological gain. Suppose, again, that an animal takes to some abundant food previously refused by its kind. It is likely to persist only if that the comparative ease in obtaining this food, more than compensates for any want of adaptation to its digestive organs; so that superposed modifications of the digestive organs are likely to arise only when an average economy results. What now must be the influence on the creature’s system as a whole? Diminished expenditure in any direction, or increased nutrition however effected, will leave a greater surplus of materials. The animal will be physiologically richer. Part of its augmented wealth will go towards its own greater individuation—its size, or its strength, or both, will increase; while another part will go towards more active genesis. Just as a state of plethora directly produced enhances fertility; so will such a state indirectly produced. In another way, the same thing must result from those additions to bulk or complexity or activity that are due to survival of the fittest. Any change which prolongs individual life, will, other things remaining the same, further the pro- duction of offspring. Even when it is not, like the foregoing, a means of economizing the forces of the individual, still, if it increases the chances of escaping destruction, it increases the chances of leaving posterity. Any further degree of evolution, therefore, will be so established only where the cost of it is more than repaid; part of the gain being shown in the lengthened life of the individual, and part in the greater production of other individuals. 476 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. We have here the solution of various minor anomalies by which the inverse variation of Individuation and Genesis is obscured. ‘Take as an instance the fertility of the Blackbird as compared with that of the Linnet. Both birds lay five eggs, and both usually have two broods. Yet the Blackbird is far the larger of the two; and ought, according to the general law, to be much less prolific. What causes this noncon- formity? We shall find an answer in their respective foods and habits. Except during the time that it is rearing its young, the Linnet collects only vegetal food—lives during the winter on the seeds it finds in the fields, or, when hard pressed, picks up around farms; and to obtain this spare diet is continually flying about. The result, if it survives the frost and snow, is a considerable depletion; and it recovers its condition only after some length of spring weather. The Blackbird, on the other hand, is omnivorous: while it eats grain and fruit when they come in its way, it depends largely on animal food. It cuts to pieces and devours the dew-worms which, morning and evening, it finds on the surface of a lawn, and, even discovering where they are, unearths them; it swallows slugs, and breaking snail-shells, either with its beak or by hammering them against stones, tears out their tenants; and it eats beetles and larve. Thus the strength of the Blackbird opens to it a store of good food, much of which is inaccessible to so small and weak a bird as a Linnet—a store especially helpful to it during the cold months, when the hybernating Snails in hedge-bottoms yield it abundant pro- vision. The result is that the Blackbird is ready to breed very early in spring; and is able during the summer to rear a second, and sometimes even a third, brood. Here, then, a higher degree of Individuation secures advantages so great, as to much more than compensate its cost: it is not that the decline of Genesis is less than proportionate to the increase of Individuation, but there is no decline at all. Com- parison of the Rat with the Mouse yields a parallel result. Though they differ greatly in size, yet the one is as prolific IN TERPRETATION AND QUALIFICATION. 477 as the other. This absence of difference cannot be ascribed to their unlike degrees of activity. We must seek its cause in some facility of living secured to the Rat by its greater intel- ligence, greater power and courage, greater ability: to utilize what it finds. The Rat is notoriously cunning; and its cunning gives success to its foraging expeditions. It is not, like the Mouse, limited mainly to vegetal food; but while it eats grain and beans like the Mouse, it also eats flesh and carrion, devours young poultry and eggs. The result is that, without a proportionate increase of expenditure, it gets a far larger supply of nourishment than the Mouse ; and this rela- tive excess of nourishment makes possible a large size without a smaller rate of multiplication. How clearly this is the cause, we see in the contrast between the common Rat and the Water-Rat. While the common Rat has habitually several broods a-year of from 10 to 12 each, the Water-Rat, though somewhat smaller, has but 5 or 6 in a brood, and but one brood, or sometimes two broods, a-year. But the Water- Rat lives on vegetal food—lacks all that its bold, sagacious, omnivorous congener, gains from the warmth as well as the abundance which men’s habitations yield. The inverse variation of Individuation and Genesis is, therefore, but approximate. Recognizing the truth that every increment of evolution which is appropriate to the circumstances of an organism, brings an advantage somewhat in excess of its cost; we see the general law, as more strictly stated, to be that Genesis decreases not quite so fast as In- dividuation increases. Whether the greater Individuation takes the form of a larger bulk and accompanyiny access of strength ; whether it be shown in higher speed or agility ; whether it consists in a modification of structure that facilitates some habitual movement, or in a visceral change that helps to utilize better the absorbed aliment ; the ultimate effect is identical. There is either a more economical per- formance of the same actions, internal or external, or there is a securing of greater advantages by modified actions, which 478 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. cost no more, or have an increased cost less than the in- creased gain. In any case, the result is a greater surplus of vital capital; part of which goes to the aggrandisement of the individual, and part to the formation of new in- dividuals. While the higher tide of nutritive matters, everywhere filling the parent-organism, adds to its power of self-maintenance, it also causes a reproductive overflow larger than before. Hence every type that is best adapted to its conditions, which on the average means every higher type, has a rate of multiplication that insures a tendency to predominate. Survival of the fittest, acting alone, is ever replacing in- ferior species by superior species. But beyond the longer urvival, and therefore greater chance of leaving offspring, which superiority gives, we see here another way in which the spread of the superior is insured. Though the more- evolved organism is the less fertile absolutely, it is the mor? fertile relatively. OP. a WP east e « CHAPTER XII. MULTIPLICATION OF THE IUMAN RACE. § 365. The relative fertility of Man considered as a species, and those changes in Man’s fertility which occur under changed conditions, must conform to the laws which we have traced thus far. As a matter of course, the inverse variation between Individuation and Genesis, holds of him as of all other organized beings. His extremely low rate of multipli- cation—far below that of all terrestrial Mammals except the Elephant, (which though otherwise less evolved, is, in extent of integration, more evolved)—we shall recognize as the necessary concomitant of his much higher evolution. And the causes of increase or decrease in his fertility, special or general, temporary or permanent, we shall expect to find in those changes of bulk, of structure, or of expenditure, which we have in all other cases seen associated with such effects. In the absence of detailed proof that these parallelisins exist, 1t might suffice to contemplate the several communities between the reproductive function in human beings and other beings. Ido not refer simply to the fact that genesis pro- ceeds in a similar manner; but I refer to the similarity of the relation between the generative function and the fune- tions that have for their joint end the preservation of the individual. In Man, as in other creatures that expend much, genesis commences only when growth and development are declining in rapidity and approaching their termination. Among the higher organisms in general, the reproductive 65 480 LAWS OF MULTIPJ ICATION. activity, continuing during the prime of life, ceases when the vigour declines, leaving a closing period of infertility; and in like manner among ourselves, barrenness supervenes when middle age brings the surplus vitality to an end. So, too, it is found that in Man, as in beings of lower orders, there is a period at which fecundity culminates. In § 341, facts were cited showing that at the commencement of the reproductive period, animals bear fewer offspring than afterwards; and that towards the close of the reproductive period, there is a decrease in the number produced. In like manner it is shown by the tables of Dr. Duncan’s recent work, that the fecundity of women increases up to the age of about 25 years; and continuing high with but slight diminution till after 30, then gradually wanes. It is the same with the sizes and weights of offspring. Infants born of women from 28 to 29 years of age, are both longer and heavier than infants born of younger or older women; and this difference has the same implication as the greater total weight of the offspring pro- duced at a birth, during the most fecund age of a pluriparous animal. Once more, there is the fact that a too-early bearing of young produces on a woman the same injurious effects as on an inferior creature—an arrest of growth and an enfeeble- ment of constitution. Considering these general and special parallelisms, we might safely infer that variations of human fertility conform to the same laws as do variations of fertility in general. But it is not needful to content ourselves with an implication. Evidence is assignable that what causes increase or decrease of genesis in other creatures, causes increase or decrease of genesis in Man. It is true that, even more than hitherto, our reasonings are beset by difficulties. ‘So numerous are the inequalities in the conditions, that but few unobjectionable comparisons can be made. The human races differ consider- ably in their sizes, and notably in their degrees of cerebral development. The climates they inhabit entail on them widely different consumptions of matter for maintenance of =). t-. . MULTIPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RACE. 4351 temperature. Both in their qualities and quantities, the foods they live on are unlike ; and the supply is here regular and there very irregular. Their expenditures in bodily action are extremely unequal; and even still more unequal are their expenditures in mental action. Hence the factors, varying so much in their amounts and combinations, can scarcely ever nave their respective effects identified. Never- theless there are a few comparisons, the results of which may withstand criticism. § 366. The increase of fertility caused by a nutrition that is greatly in excess of the expenditure, is to be detected by contrasting populations of the same race, or allied races, one of which obtains good and abundant sustenance much more easily than the other. Three cases may here be set down. The traveller Barrow, describing the Cape-Boors, says :— “ Unwilling to work and unable to think,” * * * “indulging to excess in the gratification of every sensual appetite, the African peasant grows to an unwieldy size;” and respecting the other sex, he adds—‘“ the women of the African peasantry lead a life of the most listless inactivity.” Then, after illus- trating these statements, he goes on to note “ the prolific tendency of all the African peasantry. Six or seven children in a family are considered as very few; from a dozen to twenty are not uncommon.” The native races of this region yield evidence to the same effect. Speaking of the cruelly-used Hottentots (he is writing sixty years ago), who. while they are poor and ill-fed, have to do all the work for the idle Boors, Barrow says that they “seldom have more than two or three children; and many of the women are barren.” This unusual infertility stands in remarkable con- trast with the unusual fertility of the Kaffirs, of whom he afterwards gives an account. Rich in cattle, leading easy lives, and living almost exclusively on animal food (chiefly milk with occasional flesh), these people were then reputed $52 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. to have a very high rate of multiplication. Barrow writes :— “They are said to be exceedingly prolific; that twins are almost as frequent as single births, and that it is no un- common thing for a woman to have three at a time.” Pro- bably both these statements are in excess of the truth; but there is room for large discounts without destroying the extreme difference. A third instance is that of the French Canadians. ‘‘ Nous sommes terribles pour les enfants !”” observed one of them to Prof. Johnston; who tells us that the man who said this “was one of fourteen children—was himself the father of fourteen, and assured me that from eight to sixteen was the usual number of the farmers’ families. He even named one or two women who had brought their husbands five-and-twenty, and threatened ‘ /e vingt-siziéme pour le prétre.”’ From these large families, joined with the early marriages and low rate of mortality, it results that, by natural increase, ‘‘ there are added to the French-Canadian population of Lower Canada four persons for every one that is added to the population of England.” Now these French-Canadians are described by Prof. Jehnston as home-loving, contented, unenterprising; and as living in a region where “land and subsistence are easily obtained.” Very moderate industry brings to them liberal supplies of necessaries ; and they pass a considerable portion of the year in idleness. Hence the cost of Individuation being much reduced, the rate of Genesis is much increased. That this uncommon fertility is not due to any direct influence of the locality, is implied by the fact that along with the “ restless, discontented, striving, burning energy of their Saxon neigh- bours”? no such rate of multiplication is observed; while further south, where the physical circumstances are more favourable if anything, the Anglo-Saxons, leading lives of excessive activity, have a fertility below the average. And that the peculiarity is not a direct effect of race, is proved by the fact that in Europe, the rural French are certainly not more prolific than the rural English. MULTIPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RACE. 4&4 To every reader there will probably occur the seemingly adverse evidence furnished by the Irish; who, though not well fed, multiply fast. Part of this more rapid increase is due to the earlier marriages common among them, and con- sequent quicker succession of generations—a factor which, as we have seen, has a larger effect than any other on the rate of multiplication. Part of it is due to the greater generality of marriage—to the comparative smallness of the number who die without having had the opportunity of pro- ducing offspring. The effects of these causes having been deducted, we may doubt whether the Irish, individually con- sidered, would be found more prolific than the English. Perhaps, however, it will be said that, considering their diet, they ought to be less prolific. This is by no means obvious. It is not simply a question of nutriment absorbed: it is a question of how much remains after the expenditure in self- maintenance. Now a notorious peculiarity in the life of the Irish peasant, 1s, that he obtains a return of food that is large in proportion to his outlay in labour. The cultivation of his potatoe-ground occupies each cottager but a small part of the year; and the domestic economy of his wife is not of a kind to entail on her much daily exertion. Consequently, the crop, tolerably abundant in quantity though innutritive in quality, very possibly suffices to meet the comparatively-low expendi- ture, and to leave a good surplus for genesis—perhaps a greater surplus than remains to the males and females of the English peasantry, who, though fed on better food, are harder worked. We conclude, then, that in the human race, as in all other races, such absolute or relative abundance of nutriment as ieaves a large excess after defraying the cost of carrying on parental life, is accompanied by a high rate of genesis.* * This is exactly the reverse of Mr. Doubleday’s doctrine ; which is that throughout both the animal and vegetal kingdoms, ‘‘ over-feeding checks in- crease ; whilst, on the other hand, a limited or deficient nutriment stimu- lates. and adds to it.” Or, as he elsewhere says—‘‘ Be the range of the 484 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. § 307. Evidence of the converse truth, that relative in crease of expenditure, leaving a diminished surplus, reduces the degree of fertility, is not wanting. Some of it has been set down for the sake of antithesis in the foregoing section. Here may be grouped a few facts of a more special kind Laving the same implication. To prove that much bodily labour renders women less prolific, requires more evidence than is obtainable. Some evi- dence, however, may be set down. De Boismont in France and Dr. Szukits in Austria, have shown by extensive statistical comparisons, that the reproductive age is reached a year later by women of the labouring class than by middle-class women; and while ascribing this delay in part to inferior natural power to increase in any species what it may, the plethoric state invariably checks it. and the deplethoric state invariably develops it ; and this happens in the exact ratio of the intensity and completeness of each state, until each state be carried so far as to bring about the actual death of the animal or plant itself.” I have space here only to indicate the misinterpretations on which Mr. Doubleday has based his argument. In the first place, he has confounded normal plethora with what I have, in $ 355, distinguished as abnormal plethora. The cases of infertility accom- panying fatness, which he cites in proof that over-feeding checks increase, are not cases of high nutrition properly so called; but cases of such defective absorption or assimilation as constitutes low nutrition. In Chap. IX, abun- dant proof was given that a truly plethoric state is an unusually fertile state. It may be added that much of the evidence by which Mr. Doubleday seeks to show that among men, highly-fed classes are infertile classes, may be out- balanced by counter-evidence. Many years ago Mr. Lewes pointed this out : extracting from a book on the peerage, the names of 16 peers who had, at that time, 186 children ; giving an average of 11°6 in a family. Mr. Doubleday insists much on the support given to his theory by the barrenuess of very luxuriant plants, and the fruitfulness produced in plants by depletion. Had he been aware that the change from barrenness to fruit- fulness in plants, is a change from agamogenesis to gamogtnesis—had it been as well known at the tine when he wrote as it is now, that a tree which goes on putting out sexless shoots, is so producing new individuals; and that when it vegins to bear fruit, it simply begins to produce r ew individuals after another manner—he would have perzeived that facts of this class do not tell in his avour. In the law which Mr. Doubleday alleges, he sees a guarantee for the main. BIO ROP in Agi ahrays 2 Re eT ee ee MULTIPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RACE. 435 nutrition, we may suspect that if is in part due to greater muscular expenditure. A kindred fact, admitting of a kindred interpretation, may be added. Tbough the com- paratively-low rate of increase in France is attributed to other causes, yet, very possibly, one of its causes is the greater proportion of hard work entailed on French women, by the excessive abstraction of men for non-productive occupations, military and civil. The higher rate of multiplication in England than in continental countries generally, is not im- probably furthered by the easier lives which English women lead. That absolute or relative infertility is generally pro- duced in women by mental labour carried te excess, is more clearly shown. Though the regimen of upper-class girls is not what it should be, yet, considering that their feeding is tenance of species. He argues that the plethoric state of the individuals con- stituting any race of organisms, presupposes conditions so favourable to life that the race can be in no danger; and that rapidity of multiplication becomes needless. Conversely, he argues that a deplethoric state implies unfavourable conditions—implies, consequently, unusual mortality; that is—implies a necessity for increased fertility to prevent the race from dying out. It may be readily shown, however, that such an arrangement would be the reverse of self-adjusting. Suppose a species, too numerous for its food, to be in the resulting deplethoric state. It will, according to Mr. Doubleday, become unusually fertile ; and the next generation will be more numerous rather than less numerous. For, by the hypothesis, the unusual fertility due to the deplethoric state, is the cause of undue increase of population. But if the next generation is more numerous while the supply of food has remained the same, or rather has decreased under the keener competition for it, then this next generation will be in a still more deplethoric state, and will be still more fertile. Thus there will go on an ever-increasing rate of multiplication, and an ever-decreasing supply of food, until the species Cisappears. Suppose, on the cther hand, the members of a species to be in an unusually plethoric state. Their rate of multiplication, ordinarily suffi- cient 1o maintain their numbers, will become insufficient to maintain their numbers. In the next generation, therefore, there will be fewer to eat the already abundant food, which, becoming relatively still more abundant, wit render the fewer members of the species still more plethoric, and still less fertile, than their parents. And the actions and reactions continuing, the species will presently die out from absolute barrenness. $356 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. better than that of girls belonging to the poorer classes, while, in most other respects, their physical treatment is not worse, the deficiency of reproductive power among them may be reasonably attributed to the overtaxing of their brains—an overtaxing which produces a serious reaction op the physique. This diminution of reproductive power is not shown only by the greater frequency of absolute sterility ; nor is it shown only in the earlier cessation of child-bearing ; but it is also shown in the very frequent inability of such women to suckle their infants. In its full sense, the re- productive power means the power to bear a well-developed infant, and to supply that infant with the natural food for the natural period. Most of the flat-chested girls who survive their high-pressure education, are incompetent to do this. Were their fertility measured by the number of children they could rear without artificial aid, they would prove relatively very infertile. The cost of reproduction to males being so much less than it is to females, the antagonism between Genesis and Individuation is not cften shown in men by suppression of generative power consequent on unusual expenditure in bodily action. Nevertheless, there are indications that this results in extreme cases. We read that the ancient athlete rarely had children ; and among such of their modern repre- sentatives as acrobats, an allied relation of cause and effect is alleged. Indirectly this truth, or rather its converse, appears to have been ascertained by those who train men for feats of strength—they find it needful to insist on con- tinence. Special proofs that 1n men, great cerebral expenditure di- minishes or destroys generative power, are difficult to obtain. It is, indeed, asserted that intense application to mathematics, requiring as it does extreme concentration of thought, is apt to have this result. and it is asserted, too, that this result is produced by the excessive emotional excitement of gambling Then, again, it is a matter of common remark how frequently MULTIPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RACE. 427 men of anusual mental activity leave no offspring. But facts of this kind admit: of another interpretation. ‘The re- action of the brain on the body is so violent—the overtaxing of the nervous system is so apt to prostrate the heart and derange the digestion ; that the incapacities caused in these cases, are probably often due more to constitutional dis- turbance than to the direct deduction which excessive action entails. Such instances harmonize with the hypothesis; but how far they yield it positive support we cannot say. § 368. An objection must here be guarded against. It is likely to be urged that since the civilized races are, on the average, larger than many of the uncivilized races ; and since they are also somewhat more complex as well as more active ; they ought, in conformity with the alleged general law, to be less prolific. There is, however, no evidence to prove that they are.so: on the whole, they seem rather the reverse. The reply is that were all other things equal, these superior varieties of men should have inferior rates of in- crease. But other things are not equal; and it is to the inequality of other things that this apparent anomaly is attributable. Already we have seen how much more fertile domesticated animals are than their wild kindred; and the causes of this greater fertility are also the causes of the ereater fertility, relative or absolute, which civilized men exhibit when compared with savages. There is the difference in amount of food. Australians, Fuegians, and sundry races that might be named as having low rates of multiplication, are obviously underfed. The sketches of natives contained in the volumes of Livingstone, Baker, and others, yield clear proofs of the extreme depletion common among the uncivilized. In quality as well as in quantity, their feeding is bad. Wild fruits, insects, larvae, vermin, &c., which we refuse with disgust, often enter largely into their dietary. Much of this inferior food they eat unvooked; and they have not our 4188 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. elaborate appliances for mechanically-preparing it, and rejecting its useless parts. So that they live on matters of less nutritive value, which cost more both to masticate and to digest. Further, to uncivilized men supplies of food come very irregularly: long periods of scarcity are divided by short periods of abundance. And though by eorging when opportunity occurs, something is done towards” compensating for previous want, yet the effects of prolonged starvation cannot be neutralized by occasional enormous meals. Bearing in mind, too, that improvident as they are, savages often bestir themselves only under pressure of hunger, we may fairly consider them as habitually ill- nourished—may see that even the poorer classes of civilized men, making regular meals on food separated from in- nntritive matters, easy to masticate and digest, tolerably good in quality and adequate if not abundant in quantity, are much better nourished. Then, again, though a much greater consumption in mus- cular action appears to be undergone by civilized men than by savages; and though it 1s probably true that among our labouring people the daily repairs cost more; yet in many cases there does not exist so much difference as we are apt to suppose. The chase is very laborious; and great amounts of exertion are gone through by the lowest races in seeking and securing the odds and ends of wild food on which they largely depend. We naturally assume that because barbarians are averse to regular labour, their muscular action is less than our own. But this is not necessarily true. The monotonous toil is what they cannot tolerate; and they may be ready to go through as much or more exertion when it is joined with excitement. If we remember that the sportsman who gladly scrambles up and down rough hill- sides all day after grouse or deer, would think himself hardly used had he to spend as much effort and time in digging; we shall see that a savage who is the reverse of industrious. may nevertheless be subject to a muscular waste not very MULTIPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RACE, 489 different in amount from that undergone by the indus- trious. When it is added that a larger physiolo- gical expenditure is entailed on the uncivilized than on the civilized by the absence of good appliances for shelter and protection—that in some cases they have to make good a greater loss of heat, and in other cases suffer much wear from irritating swarms of insects—we shall see that the total cost of self-maintenance among them is probably in many cases little less, and in some cases more, than if is among ourselves. So that though, on the average, the civilized are probably larger than the savage; and. though they are, in their nervous systems at least, somewhat more complex; and though, other things equal, they ought to be the less prolific; yet, other things are so unequal, as to make it quite conformable to the general law that they should be more prolific. In § 365 we observed how, among inferior animals, higher evolution sometimes makes self-preservation far easier, by opening the way to resources previously un- available: so involving an undiminished, or even an in- creased, rate of genesis. And similarly we may expect among races of men, that those whose slight further develop- ments have been followed by habits and arts that immensely facilitate life, will not exhibit a lower degree of fertility, aad may even exhibit a higher. § 369. One more objection has to be met—a kindred ob- jection to which there is a kindred reply. Cases may be named of men conspicuous for activity, bodily and mental, who were also noted, not for less generative power than usual, but for more. As their superiorities indicate higher degrees of evolution, it may be urged that such men should, accord- ing to the theory, have lower degrees of reproductive activity. The fact that here, along with increased powers of self-pre- servation, there go increased powers of race-propagation, seems irreconcilable with the general doctrine. Reconcilia- tion is not difficult however. 490 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. The cases are analogous to some before named, in which more abundant food simultaneously aggrandizes the indi- vidual and adds to the production of new individuals—the difference between the cases being, that instead of a better external supply cf materiais there is here a better internal utilization of materials Creatures of the same species noto- riously differ in goodness of constitution. Here there is some visceral defect, showing itself in feebleness of all the fune- tions; while here some peculiarity of organic balance, some high quality of tissue, some abundance or potency of the digestive juices, gives to the system a perpetual high tide of rich blood, that serves at once to enhance the vital activities and to raise the power of propagation. Such variations, however, are quite independent of changes in the proportion between Individuation and Genesis: this remains the same, while both are increased or decreased by the increase or decrease of the common stock of materials. An illustration will best clear up any perplexity. Let us say that the fuel burnt in the furnace of a locomotive steam- engine, answers to the food which a man consumes; let us say that the produced steam expended in working the engine, corresponds to that portion of absorbed nutriment which carries on the man’s functions and activities; and let us say that the steam blowing off at the safety-valve, answers to that portion of the absorbed nutriment which goes to the propagation of the race. Such being the condi- tions of the case, several kinds of variations are possible. All other circumstances remaining the same, there may be changes of proportion between the steam used for working the engine and the steam that escapes by the safety-valve. There may be a structural or organic change of proportion. By enlarging the safety-valve or weakening its spring, while the cylinders are reduced in size, there may be established a constitutionally-small power of locomotion and a constitu- tionally-large amount of escape-steam ; and inverse variations so produced, will answer to the inverse variations between MULTIPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RACE. 491 }ndividuation and Genesis which different tvpes of organisms show us. Again, there may be a functional change of pro- portion. If the engine has to draw a considerable load, the abstraction of steam by the cylinders greatly reduces the discharge by the safety-valve; and if a high velocity is kept up, the discharge from the safety-valve entirely ceases. Con- versely, if the velocity is low, the escape-steam bears a large ratio to the steam consumed by the motor apparatus; and if the engine becomes stationary the whole of the steam escapes by the safety-valve. This inverse variation answers to that which we have traced between Expenditure and Genesis, as displayed in the contrasts between species of the same type but unlike activities, and in the contrasts between active and inactive individuals of the same species. But now beyond these inverse variations between the quantities of consumed steam and escape-steam, that are structurally and functionally caused, there are coincident variations, producible in both by changes in the quantity of steam supplied—changes that may be caused in several ways. In the first place, the fuel thrown into the furnace may be increased or made better. Other things equal, there will result a more active locomo- tion as well as a greater escape; and this will answer to that simultaneous addition to its individual vigour and its repro- ductive activity, caused in an animal by a larger quanuty, or a superior quality, of food. Jn the second place, the steam generated may be economized. Loss by radiation from the boiler may be lessened by a covering of non-conducting sub- stances; and part of the steam thus prevented from con- densing, will go to increase the working power of the engine, while part will be added to the quantity blowing off. This variation corresponds to that simultaneous addition to bodily vigour and propagative power, which results in animals that have to expend less in keeping up their temperatures. In the third place, by improvement of the steam-generating upparatus, more steam may be obtained from a given weight of fuel. A better-formed evaporating surface, or boiler plates 492 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. which conduct more rapidly, or an increased number of tubes, may cause a larger absorption of heat from the burning mass or the hot gases it gives off; and the extra steam generated by this extra heat, will, as before, augment both the motive force and the emission through the safety-valve. And this last case of coincident variation, is parallel to the case with which we are here concerned—the augmentation of indi- vidual expenditure and of reproductive energy, that may be caused by a superiority of some organ on which the utilizing or economizing of materials depends. Manitestly, therefore, an increased expenditure for Genesis, or an increased expenditure for Individuation, may arise in one of two quite different ways—either by diminution of the antagonistic expenditure, or by addition to the store which supplies both expenditures; and confusion results from not distinguishing between these. Given the ratio 4 to 20, as expressive of the relative costs of Genesis and Individuation, and the expenditure for Genesis may be raised to 5 while the expenditure for Individuation is raised to 28, without any alteration of type; merely by favourable circumstances or superiority of constitution. Qn the other hand, cireumstances remaining the same, the expenditure for Genesis nay be raised from 4 to 5, by lowering the expenditure for Indi- viduation from 20 to 19: which change of ratio may be either functional and temporary, or structural and per- manent. And only when it is the last does it illustrate that inverse variation between degree of evolution and degree of procreative dissolution, which .we have everywhere seen. § 370. There is no reason to suppose, then, that the laws of multiplication which hold of other beings, do not hold of the human being. On the contrary, there are special facts which unite with general implications, to show that these laws do hold of the human being. The absence of direct evidence in some cases where it might be looked for, we find fully explained when ali the factors are taken into account. MULTIPLICATION OF THE HUMAN RACE, 498 And certain seemingly-adverse facts, prove, on examination, to be facts belonging to a different category from that in which they are placed, and harmonize with the rest when rightly interpreted. The conformity of human fertility to the laws of multipli- cation in general, being granted, it remains to inquire what effects must be caused by permanent changes in men’s natures and circumstances. ‘Thus far we have observed how, by their -extremely-high evolution and extremely-low fertility, man- kind display the inverse variation between IJndividuation and Genesis, in one of its extremes. And we have also observed how mankind, lke other kinds, are functionally changed in their rates of multiplication by changes of conditions. But. we have not observed how alteration of structure in Man entails alteration of fertility. The influence of this factor is so entangled with the influences of other factors which are for the present more important, that we cannot recognize it. Here, if we proceed at ull, we must proceed deductively. CHAPTER. XIII. HUMAN POPULATION IN THE FUTURE. § 371. Any further evolution in the most-highly evolved of terrestrial beings, Mun, must be of the same nature as evolution in general. Structurally considered, it may consist in greater integration, or greater differentiation, or both— augmented bulk, or increased heterogeneity and definiteness, or a combination of the two. Functionally considered, it may consist in a larger sum of actions, or more multiplied varieties of actions, or both—-a larger amount of sensible and insensible motion generated, or motions more numerous in kind and more intricate and exact in co-ordination, or motions that are greater alike in quantity, complexity, and precision. Expressing the change in terms of that more special evolution displayed by organisms ; we may say that it must be one which further adapts the moving equilibrium of organic actions. As it was pointed out in frst Principles, § 138, “the maintenance of such a moving equilibrium, re- quires the habitual genesis of internal forces corresponding in number, directions, and amounts to the external incident forces—as many inner functions, single or combined, as there are single or combined outer actions to be met.” And it was also pointed out that “the structural complexity accom- panying functional equilibration, is definable as one in which there are as many specialized parts as are capable, separately HUMAN POPULATION IN THE FUTURE. 495 and jointly, of counteracting the separate and joint forces amid which the organism exists.” Clearly, then, since all incompletenesses in Man as now constituted, are failures to meet certain of the outer actions, mostly involved, remote, irregular, to which he is exposed; every advance implies additional co-ordinations of actions and accompanying com- plexities of organization. Or once more, to specialize still further this conception of future progress, we may consider it as an advance towards completion of that continuous adjustment of internal to ex- ternal relations, which constitutes Life. In Part I. of this work, where if was shown that tie correspondence between inner and outer actions called Life, is a particular kind of what, in terms of Evolution, we called a moving equilibrium ; it was shown that the degree of life varies as the degree of correspondence. Greater evolution or higher life, implies, then, such modifications of human nature as shall make more exact the existing correspondences, or shall establish addi- tional correspondences, or both. Connexions of phenomena of a rare, distant, unobtrusive, or intricate kind, which we either suffer from or do not take advantage of, have to be responded to by new connexions of ideas, and acts properly combined and preportioned: there must be increase of know- ledge, or skill, or power, or of all these. And to effect this more extensive, more varied, and more accurate, co-ordina- tion of actions, there must be organization of still greater heterogeneity and definiteness. § 372. Let us before proceeding, consider in what par- ticular ways this further evolution, this higher life, this greater co-ordination of actions, may be expected to show ‘itself. Will it be in strength? Probably not to any considerable degree. Mechanical appliances are fast supplanting brute force, and doubtless will continue doing this. Though at present civilized nations largely depend for self-preservation 64 196 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. on vigour of limb, and are likely to do so while wars con- tinue; yet that progressive adaptation to the social state which must at last bring wars to an end, will leave the amount of muscular power to adjust itself to the requirements of a peaceful regime. Though, taking all things into account, the muscular power then required may not be less than now, there seems no reason why more should be required. Will it be in swiftness or agility? Probably not. In the savages these are important elements of the abitity to main- tain life; but in the civilized man they aid self-preservation in quite a minor degree, and there seems. no circumstance likely to necessitate an increase of them. By games and eymnastic competitions, such attributes may indeed be arti- ficially increased; but no artificial increase which does not bring a proportionate advantage can be permanent; since, other things equal, individuals and societies that devote the same amounts of energy in ways that subserve life more effectually, must by and by predominate. Will it be in mechanical skill, that is, in the better-co- ordination of complex movements? Most likely in some degree. Awkwardness is continually entailing injuries and deaths. Moreover, the complicated tools which civilization brings into use, are constantly requiring greater delicacy of manipulation. All the arts, industrial and esthetic, as they develop, imply a corresponding development of perceptive and executive faculties in men—the two necessarily act and react. Will it be in intelligence? Largely, no doubt. There is ample room for advance in this direction, and ample demand for it. Our lives are universally shortened by our ignorance In attaining complete knowledge of our own natures ana of the natures of surrounding things—in ascertaining the con- ditions of existence to which we must conform, and in dis- covering means of couforming to them under all variations of seasons and circumstances—we have abundant scope for intellectual progress. Will it be in morality, that is, in greater power of self- - — HUMAN POPULATION IN THE FUTURE. 497 regulation? Largely also: perhaps most largely. Right ‘conduct is usually come short of more from defect of will than defect of knowledge. To the due co-ordination of those complex actions which constitute human life in its civilized form, there goes not only the pre-requisite —recognition of the proper course; but the further pre- requisite—a due impulse to pursue that course. And on calling to mind our daily failures to fulfil often-repeated resolutions, we shall perceive that lack of the needful desire, rather than lack of the needful insight, is the chief cause of faulty action. A further endowment of those feelings which civilization is developing in us—sentiments responding to the requirements of the social state—emotive faculties that find their gratifications in the duties devolving on us—must be acquired before the crimes, excesses, diseases, improvi- dences, dishonesties, and cruelties, that now so greatly diminish the duration of life, can cease. Thus, looking at the several possibilities, and asking what direction this further evolution, this more complete moving equilibrium, this better adjustment of inner to outer relations, this more perfect co-ordination of actions, is likely to take; we conclude that it must take mainly the direction of a higher intellectual and emotional develop- ment. § 373. This conclusion we shall find equally forced on us if we inquire for the causes which are to bring about such results. No more in the case of Man than in the case of any other being, can we presume that evolution either has taken place, or will hereafter take place, spontaneously. In the past, at present, and in the future, all modifications, func- tional and organic, have been, are, and must be immediately or remotely consequent on surrounding conditions. What, then, are those changes in the environment to which, by direct or indirect equilibration, the human organism has been adjusting itself, is adjusting itself now, and will continue te iS LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. adjust itself? And how do they necessitate a higher cvolu- tion of the organism ? Civilization, everywhere having for its antecedent the in- - crease of population, and everywhere having for one of its consequences a decrease of certain race-destroying forces, has lor a further consequence an increase of certain other race- destroying forces. Danger of death from predatory animals lessens as men grow more numerous. Though, as they spread over the Earth and divide into tribes, men become wild beasts to one another, yet the danger of death from this cause also diminishes as tribes coalesce into nations. But the danger of death which does not diminish, is that produced by augmentation of numbers itself —the danger from deficiency of food. Supposing human nature to remain unchanged, the mortality hence resulting would, on the average, rise as human beings multiplied. If mortality, under such condi- tions, does not rise, it must be because the supply of food _ also augments; and this implies some change in human habits wrought by the stress of human needs. Here, then, is the permanent cause of modification to which eivilized’ men are exposed. Though the intensity of its action is ever being mitigated in one direction, by greater production of food ; it is, in the other direction, ever being added to by the greater production of individuals. Manifestly, the wants of their redundant numbers constitute the only stimulus mankind have to obtain more necessaries of life: were not the demand beyond the supply, there would be no motive to increase the supply. And manifestly, this excess of demand over supply is perennial: this pressure of population, of which it is the index, cannot be eluded. Though by the emigration that takes place when the pressure arrives at a certain intensity, temporary relief is from time to time obtained; yet as, by this process, all habitable countries must become peopled, it follows that in the end. the pressure, whatever it may then be, must be borne in full. This constant increase of people beyond the means of sub HUMAN POPULATION IN THE FUTURE. 499 sistence, causes, then, a never-ceasing requirement for skill, intelligence, and self-control—involves, therefore, a constant exercise of these and gradual growth of them. Every industrial improvement is at once the product of a higher form of humanity, and demands that higher form of humanity to earry it into practice, The application of science to the arts, is the bringing to bear greater intelligence for satisfying our wants; and implies continued progress of that intelligence. To get more produce from the acre, the farmer must study chemistry, must adopt new mechanical applianees, and must, by the multiplication of processes, cultivate beth his own powers and the powers of his labourers. To meet the requirements of the market, the manufacturer is per- petually improving his old machines, and inventing new ones ; and by the premium of high wages incites artizans to acquire greater skill. The daily-widening ramifications of commerce entail on the merchant a need for more know- ledge and more complex calculations; while the lessening profits of the ship-owner force him to build more scientifi- cally, to get captains of higher intelligence, and better crews. In all cases, pressure of population is the original cause. Were it not for the competition this entails, more thought and energy would not daily be spent on the business of life; and growth of mental power would not take place. Difficulty in getting a living is alike the incentive to a higher education of children, and to a more intense and long-continued application in adults. In the mother it in- duces foresight, economy, and skilful house-keeping ; in the father, laborious days and constant self-denial. Nothing but necessity could make men submit to this discipline; and nothing but this discipline could produce a continued pro- gression. In this case, as in many others, Nature secures each step in advance by a succession of trials; which are perpetually repeated, and cannot fail to be repeated, until success is achieved. All mankind in turn subject themselves more or 300 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. less to the discipline described ; they either may or may not advance under it; but, in the nature of things, only those who do advance under it eventually survive. For, neces- sarily, families and races whom this increasing difficulty of getting a living which exvess of fertility entails, does not stimulate to improvements in production—that is, to greater mental activity—are on the high road to extinction; and must ultimately be supplanted by those whom the pressure does so stimulate. This truth we have recently seen exem- plified in Ireland. And here, indeed, without further illustration, it will be seen that premature death, under all its forms and from all its causes, cannot fail to work in the same direction. For as those prematurely carried-off must, in the average of cases, be those in whom the power of self- preservation is the least, it unavoidably follows that those left behind to continue the race, must be those in whom the power of self-preservation is the greatest—must be the select of their generation. So that, whether the dangers to existence be of the kind produced by excess of fertility, or of any other kind, it is clear that by the ceaseless exercise of the faculties needed to contend with them, and by the death of all men who fail to contend with them successfully, there is ensured a constant progress towards a higher degree of skill, intelligence, and self-regulation—a better co-ordina- tien of actions—a more complete life.* * A good deal of this chapter retains its original form; and the above paragraph is reprinted verbatim from the Westminster Review for April, 1852, in which the views developed in the foregoing hundred pages were first sketched out. This paragraph shows how near one may be toa great generaliza- tion without seeing it. Though the process of natural selection is recognized ; and though to it is ascribed a share in the evolution of a higher type; yet the conception must not be confounded with that which Mr. Darwin has worked cut with such wonderful skill, and supported by such vast stores of knowledge. in the first place, natural selection is here described only as furthering direct adaptation—only as aiding progress by the preservation of individuals in whom functionally-produced modifications have gone on most favourably. - In the second place, there is no trace of the idea that natural selection may, by :0-operation with the cause assigned, or with other causes, produce divergences sie the HUMAN POPULATION IN THE FUTURE. 50] § 374. The proposition at which we have thus arrived, is then, that excess of fertility, through the changes it is ever working in Man’s environment, is itself the cause of Man’s further evoiution; and the obvious corollary here to be drawn, is, that Man’s further evolution so brought about, itself necessitates a decline in his fertility. That future progress of civilization which the never ceasing pressure of population must produce, will be ac companied by an enhanced cost of Individuation, both in structure and function; and more especially in nervous structure and function. The peaceful struggle for existence in societies ever growing more crowded and more complicated, must have for its concomitant an increase of the great nervous centres in mass, in complexity, in activity. The larger body of emotion needed as a fountain of energy for men who have to hold their places and rear their families under the inten- sifying competition of social life, is, other things equal, the correlative of larger brain. Those higher feelings presupposed by the better self-regulation which, in a better society, can alone enable the individual to leave a persistent posterity, are, other things equal, the correlatives of a more complex braia ; as are also those more numerous, more varied, more general, and more abstract ideas, which must also become increasingly of structure; and of course, in the absence of this idea, there is no im- plication, even, that natural selection has anything to do with the origin of species. And in the third place, the all-important factor of, variation— ‘* spontaneous,” or incidental as we may otherwise call it—is wholly ignored. Though use and disuse are, I think, much more potent causes of organic modification. than Mi. Darwin supposes—though, while pursuing the inquiry in detail, I have been Jed to believe that direct equilibration has played a more active part even than I had myself at one time thought ; yet I hold Mr. Darwin to have shown beyond question, that a great part of the facts— perhaps the greater part—are explicable only as resulting from the survival of individuals which have deviated in some indirectly-caused way from the ancestral type. Thus, the above paragraph contains merely a passing recogni- tion of the selective process; and indicates no suspicion of the enormous range of its effects, or of the conditions under which a large part of its etfeets are produced. 002 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. requisite for successful life as society advances. And the genesis of this larger quantity of feeling and thought, in a brain thus augmented in size and developed in structure, is, other things equal, the correlative of a greater wear of nerv- ous tissue and greater consumption of materials to repair it. So that both in original cost of construction and in subse- quent cost of working, the nervous system must become a heavier tax on the organism. Already the brain of the civi- lized man is larger by nearly thirty per cent. than the brain of the savage. Already, too, it presents an increased hetero- geneity—especially in the distribution of its convolutions. And further changes like these which have taken place under the discipline of civilized life, we infer will continue to take place. But everywhere and always, evolu- tion is antagonistic to procreative dissolution. Whether it be in greater growth of the organs which subserve self-main- tenance, whether it be in their added complexity of structure, or whether it be in their higher activity, the abstraction of the required materials, implies a diminished reserve of ma- terials for race-maintenance. And we have seen reason to believe that this antagonism between Individuation and Genesis, becomes unusually marked where the nervous sys- tem is concerned, because of the costliness of nervous struc- ture and function. In § 346 was pointed out the apparent connexion between high cerebral development and pro- longed delay of sexual maturity; and in § § 366, 367, the evidence went to show that where exceptional fer- tility exists there is sluggishness of mind, and that where there has been during education excessive expenditure in mental action, there frequently follows a complete or partial infertility. Hence the particular kind of further evolution which Man is hereafter to undergo, is one which, more than any other, may be expected to cause a decline in his power of reproduction. The higher nervous development and greater expenditure in nervous action, here described as indirectly brought about - te Qopeoral RUMAN POPULATION IN THE FUTURE. 563 by increase of numbers, and as thereafter becoming a check on the increase of numbers, must not be taken to imply an intenser strain—a mentally-laborious life. The greater emotional and intellectual power and activity above con- templated, must be understood as becoming, by small incre- ments, organic, spontaneous and pleasurable. As, even when relieved from the pressure of necessity, large-brained Euro- peans voluntarily enter on enterprises and activities which the savage could not keep up even to satisfy urgent wants ; so, their still larger-brained descendants will, in a still higher degree, find their gratifications in careers entailing still greater mental expenditures. This enhanced demand for materials to establish and carry on the psychical functions, will be a constitutional demand. We must conceive the type gradually so modified, that the more-developed nervons system irresistibly draws off, for its normal and unforced activities, a larger proportion of the common stock of nutri- ment; and while so increasing the intensity, completeness, and length of the individual life, necessarily diminishing the reserve applicable to the setting up of new. lives—no longer required to be so numerous. Though the working of this process will doubtless be interfered with and modified in the future, as it has been in the past, by the facilitation of living which civilization brings; yet nothing beyond temporary interruptions can so be caused. However much the industrial arts niay be im- proved, there must be a limit to the improvement; while, with a rate of multiplication in excess of the rate of mortality, population must continually tread on the heels of produc- tion. So that though, during the earlier stages of civiliza- tion, an increased amount of food may accrue from a given amount of labour; there must come a time when this relation will be reversed, and when every additional increment of food will be obtained by a more than proportionate labour : the disproportion growing ever higher, and the diminution of the reproductive power becoming greater. 504 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. § 375. There now remains but to inquire towards what limit this progress tends. So long as the fertility of the race is more than sufficient to balance the diminution by deaths, population must continue to increase. So long as population continues to increase, there must be pressure on tlhe means of subsistence. And so long as there is pressure on the means of subsistence, further mental development must go on, and further diminution of fertility must result Thus, the change can never cease until the rate of multiplication is just equal to the rate of mortality; that is, can never cease until, on the average, each pair has as many children as are requisite to produce another generation of child-bearing adults, equal in number to the lust generation. At first sight, this would seem to imply that eventually each pair will rarely have more than two offspring ; but a little considera- tion shows that this is a lower degree of fertility than is likely ever to be reached. Supposing the Sun’s light and heat, on which all terres- trial life depends, to continue abundant, for a period long enough to allow the entire evolution we are contemplating ; there are still certain slow astronomic and geologic changes which must prevent such complete adjustment of human nature to surrounding conditions, as would permit the rate of mul- tiplication to fall so low. As before pointed out (§ 148) during an epoch of 21,000 years, each hemisphere goes through a cycle of temperate seasons and seasons extreme in their heat and cold — variations that are themselves alternatelys exargerated and mitigated in the course of far longer cycles ; and we saw that these caused perpetual ebbings and flowings of species over different parts of the Earth’s surface. Further, by slow but inevitable geologic changes, especially those of elevation and subsidence, the climate and physical characters of every habitat are modified ; while old habitats are destroyed and new are formed. This, too, we noted as a constant cause of migrations and of consequent alterations of environment. Now though the human race differs from HUMAN POPULATION IN THE FUTURE. 94013) other races in having a power ‘f artificially counteracting external changes, yet there are limits to this power; and, even were there no limits, the changes could not fail to work their effects indirectly, if not directly. If, as is thought probable, these astronomie cycles entail recurrent glacial pe- riods in each hemisphere, then, parts of the Earth that are at one time thickly peopled, will at another time, be almost de- serted, and vice versd. The geologically-caused alterations of climate and surface, must produce further slow re-distributions of population; andother currents of people, to and from different regions, will be necessitated by the rise of successive centres of higher civilization. Consequently, mankind cannot but continue to undergo changes cf environment, physical and moral, analogous to those which they have thus far been undergoing. Such changes may eventually become slower and less marked; but they can never cease. And if they can never cease, there can never arise a perfect adaptation of human nature to its conditions of existence. To establish that complete correspondence between inner and outer actions which constitutes the highest hfe and greatest power of self- preservation, there must be a prolonged converse between the organism and circumstances that remain the same. If the external relations are being altered while the internal rela- tions are being adjusted to them, the adjustment can never become exact. And in the absence of exact adjustment, there cannot exist that theoretically-highest power of self- preservation with which there would co-exist the theoretically- lowest power of race-production. : Hence though the number of premature deaths may ul- timately become very small, it can never become so small as to allow the average number of offspring from each pai to fall so low as two. Some average number between twe and three may be inferred as the limit—a number, however, that is not likely to be quite constant, but may be ex- pected at one time to increase somewhat and afterwards to decrease somewhat, according as variations in physical 506 ; LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. and social conditions lower or raise the cost of self- preservation. Be this as it may, however, it is manifest that in the end, pressure of population and its accompanying evils will dis- appear; and will leave a state of things requiring from each individual no more than a normal and pleasurable activity. Cessation in the decrease of fertility implies cessation in the development of the nervous system; and this implies a nervous system that has become equal to all that is demanded of it—has not to do more than is natural to it. But that exercise of faculties which does not exceed what is natural. constitutes gratification. In the end, therefore, the ob- tainment of subsistence and discharge of all the parental and social duties, will require just that kind and that amount of action needful to health and happiness. The necessary antagonism of Individuation and Genesis, not only, then, fulfils with precision the @ priort law of maintenance of race, from the Monad up to Man, but ensures final attainment of the highest form of this maintenance — a form in which the amount of life shall be the greatest possible, and the births and deaths the fewest possible. This antagonism could not fail to work out the results we see it working out. The excess of fertility has itself rendered the process of civilization inevitable ; and the process of civiliza- tion must inevitably diminish fertility, and at last destroy its excess. From the beginning, pressure of population has been the proximate cause of progress. It produced the original diffusion of the race. It compelled men to abandon predatory habits and take to agriculture. It led to the clearing of the Earth’s surface. It forced men into the social state; made social organization imevitable; and has developed the social sentiments. It has stimulated to pro-_ gressive improvements in production, and to increased skill and intelligence. It is daify thrusting us into closer contact and more mutually-dependent relationships. And after having caused, as it ultimately must, the due peopling of the globe, HUMAN POPULATION IN THE FUTURE. OO? and the raising of all its habitable parts into the highest state of culture—after having brought all processes for the g the same time, developed the intellect into coniplete com- petency for its work, and the feelings into complete fitness for social life—after having done all this, the pressure of satisfaction of human wants to perfection—after having, at population, as it-gradually finishes its work, must gradually bring itself to an end. § 577. In closing the argument let us not overlook the self-sufficingness of those universal processes by which the results reached thus far have been wrought out, and which may be expected to work out these future results. Evolation under all its aspects, general and special, is an advance towards equilibrium. We have seen that the theo- retical limit towards which the integration and differentia- tion of every aggregate advances, is a state of balance be- tween all the forces to which its parts are subject, and the forces which its parts oppose to them (First Prin. § 130). And we have seen that organic evolution is a progress towards a moving equilibrium completely adjusted to en- vironing actions. It has been also pointed out that, in civilized Man, there is going on a new class of equilibrations—those between his ac- tions and the actions of the societies he forms (First Prin. § 185). Social restraints and requirements are ever altering his activities and by consequence his nature; and as fast as his nature is altered, social restraints and requirements undergo more or less re-adjustment, Here the organism and the con- ditions are both modifiable; and by successive conciliations of the two, there is effected a progress towards equilibrium. More recently we have seen that in every species, there establishes itself an equilibrium of an involved kind between the total race-destroying forces and the total race- preserving forees—an equilibrium which implies that where the ability to maintain individual life is small, the ability to propagate 508 LAWS OF MULTIPLICATION. must be great, and vice versd. Whence it follows that the evolution of a race more in equilibrium with the environment, is also the evolution of a race in which there is a correlative approach towards equilibrium between the number of new individuals produced and the number which survive and propagate. The final result to be observed, is, that in Man, all these equilibrations between constitution and conditions, between the structure of society and the nature of its members, be- tween fertility and mortality, advance simultaneously towards acommon climax. In approaching an equilibrium between his nature and the ever-varying circumstances of his inorganie environment, and in approaching an equilibrium between his nature and all the requirements of the social state, Man is at the same time approaching that lowest limit of fertility at which the equilibrium of population is maintained by the addition of as many infants as there are subtractions by death in old age. Changes numerical, social, organic, must, by their mutual influences, work unceasingly tewards a state of har- mony—a state in which each of the factors is just equal to its work. And this highest conceivable result must be wrought out by that same universal process which the simplest inor- ganic action illustrates. THE END. APPR INDEX. Ns SUBSTITUTION OF AXIAL FOR FOLIAR ORGANS IN PLANTS. 1 apPEND here the evidences referred to in §190. The most numerous and striking I have met with among the Umbellifere. Monstrosities having the alleged implication, are frequent in the common Cow-Parsnep—so frequent that they must be familiar to botanists ; and wild Angelica supplies many over-developments of like meaning. Omitting numerous cases of more or less significance, 1 will limit myself to two. One of them is that of a terminal umbel, in which nine of the outer umbellules are variously transformed—here a single flower being made monstrous by the development of some of its members into buds ; there several such malformed flowers being associated with rays that bear imperfect umbellules ; and elsewhere, flowers being replaced by ~ imbellules : some of which are perfect, and others imperfect only in the shortness of the flower-stalks. The annexed Fig. 69, represent- ‘ng in a somewhat conventionalized way, a part of the dried speci-, 65 512 men, will give an idea of this Angelica. At @ is shown a singie flower partially changed; in the umbellule marked 0, one of the rays bears a secondary umbellule; and there may be seen at ¢ and dd, several such over-develoj ments. But the most conclusive instance is that of a Cow-Parsnep, in which a single terminal umbel, besides the transformations already men- tioned, exhibits higher degrees of such transformations.* The com- ponents of this complex growth are ;—three central umbellules, ab- normal only in minor points ; one umbellule, external to these, which is partially changed into an umbel; one rather more out of the centre, which is so far metamorphosed as to be more an umbel than an umbellule: nine peripheral clusters formed by the development of umbellules into umbels, some of which are partially compounded still further. Examined in detail, these structures present the fol- lowing facts :—1. The innermost umbellule is normal, save in having a peripheral flower of which one member (apparently a petal) is transformed into a flower-bud. 2. The next umbellule, not quite so central, has one of its peripheral flowers made monstrous by the growth of a bud from the base of the calyx. 38. The third of the central umbellules has two abnormal outer flowers. One of them carries a flower-bud on its edge, in place of a foliar member. The other is half flower and half umbellule: being composed of three petals, three stamens, and five flower-buds growing where the other petals and stamens should grow. 4. Outside of these umbellules comes one of the mixed clusters. Its five central flowers are normal. Surrounding these are several flowers transformed in different degrees: one having a stamen par- tially changed into a flower bud. And then, at the periphery of this mixed cluster, come three complete umbellules and an incom- plete one in which some petals and stamens of the original flower remain. 5. A mixed cluster, in which the umbel-structure pre- dominates, stands next. Its three central flowers are normal. Surrounding them are five flowers over-developed in various ways, like those already described. And on its periphery are seven complete umbellules in place of flowers; besides an incomplete umbellule that contains traces of the original flower, one of them being a petal imperfectly twisted up into a bud. 6. Of the nine external clusters, in which the development of simple into compuund umbels is most decided, nearly all present anomalies. Three of them have each a central flower untransformed ; and in others, the central * For the information of those who may wish to examine metamorphoses _ of these kinds, I may here state that I have found nearly all the examples described, in the neighbourhood of the sea—the last-named, on the shore of Locheil, near Fort William. Whether it is that I have sought more dili- gently for cases when in such localities, or whether it is that the sea-air favours that excessive nutrition whence these transformations result, | am unable to say. 513 ambellule is composed of two, three, or four flowers. 7. But the most remarkable fact is, that in sundry of these peripheral clusters, resulting from the metamorphosis of simp!e umbels into compound umbels, “the like metamor phosis is carried a stage higher. Some of the component rays, are themselves the bearers of compound umbels mstead of simple umbels. In Fig. 70, a portion of the dried speci- men is represented. Two of the central umbellules are marked a and 0; those marked c and d are mixed clusters; at e and f are compound umbels replacing simple ones; and g shows one of the rays on which the over-development goes still further. Does not this evidence, enforced as it is by much more of like kind, go far to prove that foliar organs may be developed into axial organs? Even were not the tr ansitional forms traceable, there would still, I think, be no other legitimate interpretation of the facts last detailed. The only way of eluding the conclusion here drawn, is by assuming that where a cluster of flowers replaces a single flower, it is because the axillary buds which hypothetically belong to the several foliar organs of the flower, become developed into axes; and assuming this, is basing an hypothesis on another hypothesis that. is directly at variance with facts. The foliar organs of flowers do not bear buds in their axils; and it would never have been supposed that such buds are typically present, had it not been for that mistaken conception of “type” which has led to many other errors in Biology. Goethe writes: ‘ Now as we cannot realize the idea of a leaf apart from the node out of which it springs, or of a node without a bud, we may venture to infer,” &c. See here an example of a method of philosophizing not uncommon among the Germans 514 The method is this—Survey a portion of the facts, and draw from them a general conception; project this general conception back into the objective world. as a mould in which Nature casts her products; expect to fid it everywhere fulfilled; and allege poten- tial fulfilment where no actual fulfilment is visible. If instead of imposing our ideal forms on Nature, we are con. tent to generalize the facts as Nature presents them, we shall find no warrant for the morphological doctrine above enunciated. The only conception of type justified by the logic of science, is—that correlation of parts which remains constant under all modifications of tke structure to be defined. To ascertain this, we must compare all these modifications, and note what traits are common to them. On doing so with the successive segments of a phenogamic axis, we are brought to a conclusion widely different from that of Goethe. Axillary buds are almost universally absent from the cotyledons ; they are habitually present in the axils of fully-developed leaves higher up the axis ; they are often absent from leaves that are close to the flower; they are nearly always absent from the bracts; absent from the sepals; absent from the petals; absent from the stamens ; absent from the ecarpels. Thus, out of eight leading forms which folia assume, one has the axillary bud and seven are without it. With these facts before us, it seems to me not difficult to “ realize the idea” “of a node without a bud.” If we are not possessed by a foregone conclusion, the evidence will lead us to infer, that each node bears a foliar appendage and may bear an axillary bud. Even, however, were it granted that the typical segment of a Pheenogam includes an axillary bud, which must be regarded as always potentially present, no legitimate counter-interpretation of the monstrosities above described could thence be drawn. If when an umbellule is developed in place of a flower, the explanation is, that its component rays are axillary to the foliar organs of the flower superseded ; we may fairly require that these foliar organs to which they are axillary, shall be shown, But there are none. In the last specimen figured, the inner rays of each such umbellule are without them; most of the outer rays are also without them; and in one cluster, only a single ray has a bract at its point of origin. There is a rejoinder ready, however: the foliar organs are said to be suppressed. Though Goethe could not “ realize the idea” “ of ’ a node without a bud,” those who accept his typical form appear to find no difficulty in realizing the idea of an axillary bud without anything to which it is axillary. But letting this pass, suppose we ask what is the warrant for this assumed suppression. Axillary buds normally occur where the nutrition is high enough to produce fully-developed leaves; and when axillary buds are demonstrably present in flowers, they accompany foliar organs that are more leaf- like than usual—always greener if not always larger. That is te eo 515 say, the normal and the abnormal axillary buds, are alike the con- comitants of foliar organs coloured by that chlorophyll which habitually favours foliar development. How, then, can it be sup- posed that when, out of a flower there is developed a cluster of flower-bearing rays, the implied excess of nutrition causes the foliar organs to abort? It is true that very generally in a branched in- florescence, the bracts of the several flower-branches are very small (their smallness being probably due to that defective supply of certain chlorophyll-forming matters, which is the proximate cause of flowering) ; and it is true that, under these conditions, a flower- ing axis of considerable size, for the development of which chloro- phyll is less needful, grows from the axil of a dwarfed leaf. But the inference that the foliar organ may therefore be entirely sup- pressed, seems to me irreconcilable with the fact, that the foliar organ is always developed to some extent before the axillary bud appears. Until it has been shown that in some cases a lateral bud first appears, and a foliar organ afterwards grows out beneath it, to form its axil, the conception of an axillary bud of which the foliar organ is suppressed, will remain at variance with the established truths of development. The above originally formed a portion of $190. I have transferred it to the Appendix, partly because it contains too much detail to render it fit for the general argument, and partly because the inter- pretations being open to some question, it seemed undesirable to risk compromising that argument by including them. The criticisms passed upon these interpretations have not, however, sufficed to con- vince me of their incorrectness. Unfortunately, I have since had no opportunity of verifying the above statements by microscopic exami- nations, as I had intended. Though unable to enforce the inference drawn by further facts more minutely looked into, I may add some arguments based on facts that are well known. One of these is the fact that the so- called axillary bud is not universally axillary—is not universally seated in the angle made by the axis and an appended foliar organ. In certain plants the axillary bud is placed far above the node, half-way between it and the succeeding node. So that not only may a segment of a phenogamic axis be without the axillary bud, but the axillary bud, when present, may be removed from that place in which, according to Goethe, it necessarily exists. Another fact not congruous with the current doctrine, is the common occurrence of “‘adventitious” buds—the buds that are put out from roots and from old stems or branches bare of leaves. The name under which they are thus classed, is meant to imply that they may be left out of conside- ration. Those, however, who have not got a theory to save by 516 putting anomalies out of sight, may be inclined to think that the occurrence of buds where they are avowedly unconnected with nodes, and are axillary to nothing, tells very much against the as- sumption that every bud implies a node and a corresponding foliar organ. And they may also see that the development of these ad- ventitious buds at places where there is excess of nutritive mate- rials, favours the view above set forth. For if a bud thus arises at a place where it is not morphologically accounted for, simply because there happens to be at that place an abundance of unorganized pro- toplasm ; then, clearly, it is likely that if the mass of protaplasm from which a leaf would usually arise, is greatly increased in mass by excess of nutrition, it may develop into an axis instead of a leaf A PsP ee x B. A CRITICISM ON PROF. OWEN’S THEORY OF THE VERTEBRATE SKELETON. Prom the Britisu & ForetGN MeDICO-CHIRURGICAL REVIEW FOR OcT., 1858.] I. Ox the Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton. By LICHARD OwEN, £.2.S.—London, 1848. pp. 172. Il. Principes @ Ostéologie Comparée, ou Recherches sur l Archétype et les Homologies du Squelette Vertébré. Par RicHarp Owrn.— Paris. Principles of Comparative Osteology ; or, Researches on the Arcnetype and the Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton. By Ricuarp OWEN. Il. On the Nature of Limbs. A Discourse delivered on Friday, Lrebruary 9, at an Evening Meeting of the Royal Institution of Great Britain. By Ricuarp Owen, £.2.S.—London, 1849. pp. 119. JupGinG whether another proves his position is a widely different thing from proving your own. To establish a general law requires an extensive knowledge of the phenomena to be generalized; but to decide whether an alleged general law is established by the evidence assigned, requires merely an adequate reasoning faculty. Especially is such a decision easy where the premises do not warrant the con- clusion, It may be dangerous for one who has but little previous acquaintance with the facts, to say that a generalization is demon- strated ; seeing that the argument may be one-sided: there may be many facts unknown to him which disprove it. But it is not dangerous to give a negative verdict when the alleged demonstra- 518 tion is manifestly insufficient. If the data put before him do not bear out the inference, it is competent for every logical reader to say SO. From this stand-point, then, we venture to criticize some of Professor Owen's osteological theories. For his knowledge of comparative osteology we have the highest respect. We believe that no living man has so wide and detailed an acquaintance with the bony structure of the Vertebrata. Indeed, there probably has never been any one whose information on the subject was so nearly exhaustive. Moreover, we confess that nearly all we know of this department of biology has been learnt from his lectures and writ- ings. We pretend to no independent investigations, but merely to such knowledge of the phenomena as he has furnished us with. Our position, then, is such that, had Professor Owen simply enun- ciated his generalizations, we should have accepted them on his authority. But he has brought forward evidence to prove them. By so doing he has tacitly appealed to the judgments of his readers and hearers—has practically said, “‘ Here are the facts; do they not warrant these conclusions?” And all we propose to do, is to consider whether the conclusions are warranted by the facts brought forward. Let us first limit the scope of our criticisms. On that division of comparative osteology which deals with what Professor Owen distinguishes as “special homologies,” we do not propose to enter. That the wing of a bird is framed upon bones essentially parallel to those of a mammal’s fore-limb; that the cannon-bone of a horse’s leg answers to the middle metacarpal of the human hard; that various bones in the skull of a fish are homologous with bones in the skull of a man—these and countless similar facts, we take to be well established. It may be, indeed, that the doctrine of special homologies is at present carried too far. It may be that, just as the sweeping generalization at one time favoured, that the embryonic phases of the higher animals represent the adult forms of lower ones, has been found untrue in a literal sense, and is acceptable only in asqualified sense; so the sweeping generalization that the skeletons of all vertebrate animals consist of homolegous parts, will have to undergo some modification. But that this generalization is substantially true, all comparative anatomists agree. The doctrine which we are here to consider, is quite a separate one—that of “ general homologies.” The truth or falsity of this may be decided on quite apart from that of the other. Whether certain bones in one vertebrate animal’s skeleton correspond with certain bones in another’s, or in every other’s, is one question; and whether the skeleton of every. vertebrate animal is divisible into a Beries of segments, each of which is modelled after the same type, is another question. While the first is answered in the affirmative, d19 the last may be answered in the negative; and we propose to give reasons why it should be answered in the negative. In so far as his theory of the skeleton is concerned, Professor Owen is an avowed disciple of Plato. At the conclusion of his Archetype and Homologies of the Vertebrate Skeleton, he quotes ap- provingly the Platonic hypothesis of iJéx, “a sort of models, or moulds in which matter is cast, and which regularly produce the Same number and diversity of species.” The vertebrate form in general (see diagram of the Archetypus), or else the form of eack kind of vertebrate animal (see p. 172, where this seems implied), Professor Owen conceives to exist as an “ idea”—an “ arche- typal exemplar on which it has pleased the Creator to frame certain of his living creatures.” Whether Professor Owen holds that the typical vertebra also exists as an “idea,” is not so certain. [From the title given to his figure of the ‘“ ideal typicai vertebra,” it would seem that he does; and at p. 40 of his Nature of Limbs, and indeed throughout his general argument, this supposition is implied. But on the last two pages of the Archetype and Homologies, it is distinctly alleged that * the repetition of simi- lar segments in a vertebral column, and of similar elements in a vertebral segment, is analogous to the repetition of similar crystals as the result of polarizing force in the growth of an inorganic body ;” it is pointed out that, ‘as we descend the scale of anima life, the forms of the repeated parts of the skeleton approach more and more to geometrical figures;” and it is inferred that “the Platonic i or specific organizing principle or force, would seem to be in antagonism with the general polarizing force, and to sub- due and mould it in subserviency to the exigencies of the resulting specific form.” If Professor Owen’s doctrine is to be understood as expressed in these closing paragraphs of his Archetype and Homo- logies—if he considers that * the icéaz ” “ which produces the diver- sity of form belonging to living bodies of the same materials,” is met by the “‘ counter-operation” of ‘the polarizing force pervading all space,” which produces “ the similarity of forms, the repetition of parts, the signs of unity of organization,” and which is “ subdued” as we ascend ‘in the scale of being ;” then we may pass on with the remark that the hypothesis is too cumbrous and involved to have much vraisemblance. If, on the other hand, Professor Owen holds, as every reader would suppose from the general tenor of his reasonings, that not only does there exist an archetypal or ideal vertebrate skeleton, but that there also exists an archetypal or ideal vertebra; then he carries the Platonic hypothesis much further than Plato does. Plato’s argument, that before any species of object was created it must have existed as an idea of the Creative Intelligence, and that hence all objects of such species must be 520 sopies of this original idea, is tenable enough from the anthropo- morphic point of view. But while those who, with Plato, think fit to base their theory of creation upon the analogy of a carpenter designing and making a table, must yield assent to Plato’s inference, they are by no means committed to Professor Owen’s expansion of it. To say that before creating a vertebrate animal, God must have had the conception of one, does not involve saying that God gratuitously bound himself to make a vertebrate animal out of seg- ments all moulded after one pattern. As tnere is no conceivable advantage in this alleged adhesion to a fundamental pattern—as, for the fulfilment of the intended ends, it is not only needless, but often, as Professor Owen argues, less appropriate than some other construction would be (see Nature of Limbs, pp. 39, 40), to sup- pose the creative processes thus regulated, is not a little startling. Even those whose conceptions are so anthropomorphic as to think they honour the Creator by calling him “ the Great Artificer,” will scarcely ascribe to him a proceeding which, in a human artificer, they would consider a not very worthy exercise of ingenuity. But whichever of these alternatives Professor Owen contends for —whether the typical vertebra is that more or less crystalline figure which osseous matter ever tends to assume in spite of “the a or organizing principle,” or whether the typical vertebra is itself an “ j}éa or organizing principle”—there is alike implied the belief that the typical vertebra has an abstract existence apart from actual vertebre. It is a form which, in every endoskeleton, strives to embody itself in matter—a form which is potentially present in each vertebra; which is manifested in each vertebra with more or less clearness ; but which, in consequence of antagonizing forces, is no- where completely realized. Apart from the philosophy of this hypothesis, let us here examine the evidence which is thought to justify it. And first as to the essential constituents of the “ ideal typical vertebra.” Exclusive of “diverging appendages” which it ‘‘ may also support,” “it consists in its typical completeness of the follow- ing elements and parts”:—A centrum round which the rest are arranged in a somewhat radiate manner; above it two neurapophyses —converging as they ascend, and forming with the centrum a trian- guloid space containing the neural axis; a neural spine surmoanting the two neurapophyses, and with them completing the neural arch ; below the centrum two hemapophyses and a hemal spine, forming a hemal arch similar to the neural arch above, and enclosing the hemal axis; two pleurapophyses radiating horizontally from the sides of the centrum; and two parapophyses diverging from the centrum below the pleurapophyses. ‘ These,” says Professor Owen, “being usually developed from distinct and independent 521 centres, I have termed ‘autogenous elements.’” The remaining exexments, which he classes as “ exogenous,” because they ‘“ shoot sut as continuations from some of the preceding elements,” are the diapophyses diverging from the upper part of the centrum as the parapophyses do below, and the zygapophyses which grow out of the distal ends of the neurapophyses and hemapophyses. If, now, these are the constituents of the vertebrate segment in its typical completeness ;” and if the vertebrate skeleton consists oi a succession of such segments; we ought to have in these con- stituents, representatives of all the elements of the vertebrate skeleton—at any rate, all its essential elements. Are we then to conclude that the “ diverging appendages,” which Professor Owen regards as rudimental limbs, and from certain of which he considers actual limbs to be developed, are typically less important than some of the above-specified exogenous parts—say the zygapophyses ? That the meaning of this question may be understood, it will be needful briefly to state Professor Owen’s theory of Zhe Nature o Limbs; and such criticisms as we have to make on it must be in- cluded in the parenthesis. In the first place, he aims to show that the scapular and pelvic arches, giving insertion to the fore and hind limbs respectively, are displaced and modified hzemal arches, originally belonging in the one case to the occipital vertebra, and in the other case to some trunk-vertebra not specified. In support of this assumption of displacement, carried in some cases to the extent of twenty-seven vertebree, Professor Owen cites certain acknow- ledged displacements which occur in the human skeleton to the ex- tent of half a vertebra—a somewhat slender justification. But for proof that such a displacement /as taken place in the scapular arch, he chiefly relies on the fact that in fishes, the pectoral fins, which are the homologues of the fore-limbs, are directly articulated to certain bones at the back of the head, which he alleges are parts of the occipital vertebra. This appeal to the class of fishes is avowedly made on the principle that these lowest of the Vertebrata approach closest to archetypal regularity, and may therefore be expected to show the original relations of the bones more nearly. Simply noting the facts that Professor Owen does not give us any transitional forms between the alleged normal position of the scapular arch in fishes, and its extraordinary displacement in the higher Vertebrata ; and that he makes no reference to the embryecnic¢ phases of the higher Vertebrata, which might be expected to ex- hibit the progressive displacement; we go on to remark that, in the case of the pelvic arch, he abandons his principle of appealing to the lowest vertebrate forms for proof of the typical structure. In fishes, the rudimentary pelvis, widely removed from the spinal column, shows no signs of having belonged to any vertebra; and nere Professor Owen instances the perennibranchiate Batrachia as 522 exhibiting the typical structure : remarking that ‘“ mammals, birds, and reptiles show the rule of connexion, and fishes the exception.” Thus in the case of the scapular arch, the evidence afforded by fishes is held of great weight, because of their archetypal regularity ; while in the case of the pelvic arch, their evidence is rejected as exceptional. But now, having, as he considers, shown that these bony frames to which the limbs are articulated are modified heemal arches, Professor Owen points out that the hemal arches habitually bear certain “ diverging appendages ;” and he aims to show that the “diverging appendages” of the scapular and pelvic arches re- spectively, are developed into the fore and hind limbs. There are several indirect ways in which we may test the probability of this conclusion. If these diverging appendages are “ rudimental limbs” —‘ future possible or potential arms, legs, wings, or feet,” we may fairly expect them always to bear to the heemal arches a relation such as the limbs do. But they by no means do this. ‘ As the vertebre approach the tail, these appendages are often transferred gradually from the pleurapophysis to the parapophysis, or even to the centrum and neural arch.” (Arch. and Hom., p. 93.) Again, it might naturally be assumed that in the lowest vertebrate forms, where the limbs are but little developed, they would most clearly display their alliance with the appendages, or “ rudimental limbs,” by the similarity of their attachments. Instead of this, however, Professor Owen’s drawings show that whereas the appendages are habitually attached to the pleurapophyses, the limbs, in their earliest and lowest phase, alike in fishes and in the Lepzdosiren, are articu- lated to the hemapophyses. Most anomalons of all, however, is the process of development. When we speak of one thing as being developed out of another, we imply that the parts next to the germ are the first to appear, and the most constant. In the evolution of a tree out of a seed, there come at the outset the stem and the radicle ; afterwards the branches and divergent roots; and still later the branchlets and rootlets; the remotest parts being the latest and most inconstant. If, then, a limb is developed out of a “ di- verging appendage ” of the hemal arch, the earliest and most con- stant bones should be the humerus and femur; next in order of time and constancy should come the coupled bones based on these ; while the terminal groups of bones should be the last to make their appearance, and the most liable to be absent. Yet, as Professor Owen himself shows, the actual mode of development is the very re- verse of this. At p. 16 of the Archetype and Homologies, he says :— ‘¢ The earlier stages in the development of all locomotive extremities are permanently retained or represented in the paired fins of fishes. First the essential part of the member, the hand or foot, appears: then the fore-arm ur leg, both much shortened, flattened, and expanded, as in all fins and all embryonic rudiments uf limbs: finally come the humeral and femoral seg: ments ; but this stage I have not found attained in any fish.” —-.— - —_ ~~ 523 That is to say, alike in ascending through the Vertebrata gene. rally, and in tracing up the successive phases of a mammalian em- bryo, the last-developed and least constant division of the limb, is that basic one by which it articulates with the hemal arch. It seems to us that, so far from proving his hypothesis, Professor Owen’s own facts tend to show that limbs do not belong to the vertebre at all; that they make their first appearance peripherally ; that their development is centripetal; and that they become fixed to such parts of the vertebrate axis as the requirements of the case determine. But now, ending here this digressive exposition and criticism, and granting the position that limbs “are developments of costal appendages,” let us return to the question above put—W hy are not these appendages included as elements of the ‘ ideal typical ver- tebra?” It cannot be because of their comparative inconstancy ; for judging from the illustrative figures, they seem to be as con- stant as the hemal spine, which is one of the so-called autogenous elements: in the diagram of the Archetypus, the appendage is re- presented as attached to every vertebrate segment of the head and trunk, which the hemal spine is not. It cannot be from their com- parative unimportance; seeing that as potential limbs they are essential parts of nearly all the Vertebrata—much more obviously so than the diapophyses are. If, as Professor Owen argues, ‘ the divine mind which planned the archetype also foreknew all its modifications ;” and if, among these modifications, the development of limbs out of diverging appendages was one intended to charac- terize all the higher Vertebrata ; then, surely, these diverging ap- pendages must have been parts of the “ideal typical vertebra.” Or, if the “ ideal typical vertebra” is to be understood as a crystal- line form in antagonism with the organizing principle; then why should not the appendages be included among its various offshoots ? We do not ask this question because of its intrinsic importance. We ask it for the purpose of ascertaining Professor Owen’s method of determining what are true vertebral constituents. He presents us with a diagram of the typical vertebra, in which are included certain bones, and from which are excluded certain others. If re- lative constancy is the criterion, then there arises the question— What degree of constancy entitles a bone to be included? Ii re- lative importance is the criterion, there comes not only the question — What degree of importance suffices? but the further question —How is importance to be measured? If neither of these is the eriterion, then what is it? And if there is no criterion, does it not follow that the selection is arbitrary ? This question serves to introduce a much wider one :—Has the ideal typical vertebra” any essential constituents at all? I¢ might o24 naturally be supposed that though some bones are su rarely developed as not to seem worth including, and though some that are included are very apt to be absent; yet that certain others are invariable: forming, as it were, the basis of the ideal type. Let us see whether the facts bear out this supposition. In his “summary of modifications of corporal vertebre” (p. 96), Professor Owen says— The hemal spine is much less constant as to its existence, and is subject to a much greater range of variety, when present, than its vertical homotype above, which completes the neural arch.” Again he says— The haemapophyses, as osseous elements of a vertebra, are less constant than the pleuraponphyses.” And again— “The pleurapophyses are less constant elements than the neurapo- physes.” And again—‘ Amongst air-breathing vertebrates the pleurapophyses of the trunk segments are present only in those species in which the septum of the heart’s ventricle is complete and imper- forate, and here they are exogenous and confined to the cervical and anterior thoracic vertebra.” And once more, both the neura- pophyses and the neural spine “ are absent under both histological conditions, at the end of the tail in most air-breathing vertebrates, where the segments are reduced to their central elements.” That is to say, of all the peripheral elements of the “ideal typical vertebra,” there is not one which is always present. It will be ex- pected, however, that at any rate the centrum is constant: the bone which ‘“ forms the axis of the vertebral column, and commonly the central bond of union of the peripheral elements of the vertebra (p. 97), is uf course an invariable element. No: not even this is essential, ‘«The centrums do not pas3 beyond the primitive stage of the notochord (undivided column) in the existing lepidosiren, and they retained the like rudimental state in every fish whose remains have been found in strata earlier than the permian era in Geology, though the number of vertebre is frequently indicated in Devonian ‘and Silurian ichthyolites by the fossilized neur- and hemapophyses and their spines” (p. 96). Indeed, Professor Owen himself remarks that “the neurapo- physes are more constant as osseous or cartilaginous elements of the vertebra than the centrums” (p. 97). Thus, then, it appears that the several elements included in the “ ideal typical vertebra” have various degrees of constancy, and that no one of them is essential. There is no one part of a vertebra which invariably answers to its exemplar in the pattern-group. How does this fact consist with the hypothesis? If the Creator saw fit to make the vertebrate skeleton out of a series of segments, all formed on essentially the same mode; —if, for the maintenance of the type, one of these bony segments 1: in many cases formed out of a coalesced group of pieces, where, as Professor Owen argues, a single piece would have served as well or better ; then we ought to find this typical repetition of parts uni- 525 formly manifested. Without any change of shape, it would obvi ously have been quite possible for every actual vertebra to have coutained all the parts of the ideal one—rudimentally where they were not wanted. Even ore of the terminal bones of a mammal’s tail might have been formed ont of the nine autogenons pieces, united by suture but admitting of identification. As, however, there is no such uniform typical repetition of parts, it seems to us that to account for the typical repetition which does occur, by sup- posing the Creator to have fixed on a pattern-vertebra, is to ascribe to him the inconsistency of forming a plan and then abandoning it. If, on the other hand, Professor Owen means that the “ ideal typical vertebra” is a crystalline foma in antagonism with “ the idea or organizing principle ;” then we might fairly expect to find it most clearly displaying its crystalline character, and its full com- plement of parts, in those places where the organizing principle may be presumed to have “subdued” it to the smallest extent. Yet in the Vertebrata generally, and even in Professor Owen’s Archetypus, the vertebre of the tail, which must be considered as, if anything, less under the influence cf the organizing priaciple than those of the trunk, do not manifest the ideal form more com- pletely. On the contrary, as we approach the end of the tail, the successive segments not only lose their remaining typical elements, but become as uncrystalline-looking as can be conceived. Supposing, however, that the assumption of suppressed or unde- veloped elements be granted—supposing it to be consistent with the hypothesis of an ‘ideal typical vertebra,” that the constituent parts may severally be absent in greater or less number, sometimes leaving only a single bone to represent them all; may it not be that such parts as ave present, show their respective typical natures by some constant character: say their mode of ossification ? To this question some parts of the Archetype and Homologies seem to reply, “ Yes;” while others clearly answer, ‘“ No.” Criticising the opinions of Geoffroy St. Hilaire and Cuvier, who agreed in thinking that ossification from a separate centre was the test of a separate bone, and that thus there were as many elementary bones in the skeleton as there were centres of ossification, Professor Owen points out that, according to this test, the human femur, which is ossified from four centres, must be regarded as four bones; while the femur in birds and reptiles, which is ossified from a single centre, must be regarded as a single bone. Yet, on the other hand, he attaches weight to the fact that the skull of the human foetus presents “‘ the same ossific centres ” as do those of the embryo kan- garoo and the young bird (Nature of Limbs, p. 40.) And at p. 104 of the Homologies, after giving a number of instances, he says— ‘These and the like correspondences between the points of ossification ot 526 the human fcetal skeleton, and the separate bones of the adult skeletons of inferior animals, are pregnant with interest, and rank among the most striking illustrations of unity of plan in the vertebrate organization.” It is true that on the following page he seeks to explain this’ seeming contradiction by distinguishing ** between those centres of ossification that have homological relations, and those that have teleological ones—i.e., between the separate points of ossifica- tion of a human bone which typify vertebral elements, often permanently dis- tinct bones in the lower animals ; and the separate points which, without such signification, facilitate the progress of osteogeny, and have for their obvious final cause the well-being of the growing animal.” But if there are thus centres of ossification which have homo- logical meanings, and others which have not, there arises the ques- tion—How are they always to be distinenished ? Evidently in- dependent ossification ceases to be a homological test, if there are independent ossifications that have nothing to do with the homo- logies. And this becomes the more evident when we learn that there are cases where neither a homological nor a teleological meaning can be given. Among various modes of ossification of the centrum, Professor Owen points out that “the body of the human atlas is sometimes ossified from two, rarely from three, distinct centres placed side by side” {p. 89); while at p. 87 he says :—“ In osseous fishes I find that the centrum is usually ossified from siz points.” It is clear that this mode of ossification has here no home- logical signification ; and it would be difficult to give any teleo- logical reason why the small centrum of a fish should have more centres of ossification than the large centrum of amammal. The truth is, that as a criterion of the identity or individuality of a bone, mode of ossification is quite untrustworthy. Though, in his “ideal typical vertebra,” Professor Owen delineates and classifies as sepa- rate ‘“ autogenous” elements, those parts which are “ usually developed from distinct and independent centres ;” and though by doing so he erects this characteristic into some sort of criterion ; yet his own facts show it to be no criterion. The parapophyses are classed among the autogenous elements; yet they are auto- genous in fishes alone, and in these only in the trunk vertebra, while in all air-breathing vertebrates they are, when present at all, exogenous. The neurapophyses, again, “ lose their primitive in- dividuality by various kinds and degrees of confluence:” in the tails of the higher Vertebrata they, in common with the neural spine, become exogenous. Nay, even the centrum may lose its autogenous character. Describing how, in some _batrachians, “ the ossification of the centrum is completed by an extension of bone from the bases of the neurapophyses, which effects also the coalescence of these with the centrum,” Professor Owen adds : “ in Pelobates fuscus and Pelobates cultripes, Miiller found the en- 927 tire centrum ossified from this source, without any independent poiuts of ossification” (p. 88). That is to say, the centrum is in these cases an exogenous process of the nearapophyses. We see, then, that these so-called typical elements of vertebrie have no constant developmental character by which they can be identified. Not only are they undistinguishable by any specific test from other bones not included as vertebral elements; not only do they fail te show their typical characters by their constant presence; but, when present, they exhibit no persistent marks of individuality. The central element may be ossified from six, four, three, or two points; or it may have no separate point of ossification at all: and similarly with various of the peripheral elements. The whole group of bones forming the “ ideal typical vertebra” may severally have their one or more ossific centres ; or they may, as in a mam- mal’s tail, lose their individualities in a single bone ossified from one or two points. Another fact which seems very difficult to reconcile with the hypothesis of an “ideal typical vertebra,” is the not infrequent presence of some of the typical elements in duplicate. Not only, as we have seen, may they severally be absent ; but they may seve- rally be present in greater number than they should be. When we see, in the ideal diagram, one centrum, two neurapophyses, two pleurapophyses, two hemapophyses, one neural spine, and one heemal spine, we naturally expect to find them always bearing to each other these numerical relations. Though we may not be greatly surprised by the absence of some of them, we are hardly prepared to find others multiplied. Yet such cases are common, Thus the neural spine ‘is double in the anterior vertebrae of some fishes” (p. 98). Again, in the abdominal region of extinct saurians, and in crocodiles, ‘‘ the freely-suspended hemapophyses are com- pounded of two or more overlapping bony pieces” (p. 100). Yet again, at p. 99, we read—‘ I have observed some of the expanded pleurapophyses in the great Testudo elephantopus ossified from two centres, and the resulting divisions continuing distinct, but united by suture.” Once more “ the neurapophyses, which do not advance beyond the cartilaginous stage in the sturgeon, consist in that fish of two distinct pieces of cartilage ; and the anterior pleurapophyses also consist of two or more cartilages, set end on end” (p. 91). And elsewhere referring to this structure, he says :— ‘¢ Vegetative repetition of perivertebral parts not only manifests itself in the composite neurapophyses and pleurapophyses, but in a small accessory (interneural) cartilage, at the fore and back part of the base of the neura- vophysis ; and by a similar (interhemal) one at the fore and back part of most of the parapophyses” (p. 87). Thus the neural and hemal spines, the. neurapophyses, the plen- 63 528 rapophyses, the hemapophyses, may severally consist of two or more pieces. ‘This is not all: the like is true even of the centrums. ‘“‘In Heptanchus (Squalus cinereus) the vertebral centres are feebly and vegetatively marked out by numerous slender rings of hard cartilage in the notochordal capsule, the number of vertebree being more definitely indicated by the neurapophyses and parapophyses. . . . Im the piked dog-fish (Acanthias) and the spotted dog-fish (ScylZium) the vertebral centres coin- cide in number with the neural arches” (p. 87). Is it not strange that the pattern vertebra should be so little ad- hered to, that each of its single typical pieces may be transformed into two or three? But there are still more startling departures from the alleged type. The numerical relations of the elements vary not only in this way, but in the opposite way. A given part may be present not only in greater number than it should be, but also in less. In the tails of homocercal fishes, the centrums “ are rendered by cer- tripetal shortening and bony confluence fewer in number than the persistent, neural, and hemal arches of that part ’—that is, there is only a fraction of a centrum to each vertebra. Nay, even this is not the most heteroclite structure. Paradoxical as it may seem, there are cases in which the same vertebral element is, considered under different aspects, at once in excess and defect. Speaking of the hemal spine, Professor Oweu says :— ‘* The horizontal extension of this vertebral element is sometimes accom- anied by a median division, or in other words, it is ossified from two ee centres ; this is seen in the development of parts of the human sternum ; the same vegetative character is constant in the broader thoracie hemal spines of birds ; though, sometimes, as e.g., in the struthionida, ossification extends from the same lateral centre lengthwise—i.e., forwards and backwards, calcifying the connate cartilaginous homoleques of halves of four or five hemal spines, before these finally coalesce with their fellows at the median line” (p. 101). “ So that the sternum of the ostrich, which according to the hypo- thesis, should, in its cartilaginous stage, have consisted of four or jive transverse pieces, answering to the vertebral segments, and should have been ossified from four or five centres, one to each cartilaginous piece, shows not a trace of this structure; but in- stead, consists of two longitudinal pieces of cartilage, each ossilied from one centre, and finally coalescing on the median line. These four or five heemal spines have at the same time doubled their in- (lividualities transversely, and entirely lost them longitudinally ! There still remains to be considered the test of relative position It might be held that, spite of all the foregoing anomalies, if the typical parts of the vertebree always stood towards each other in the same relations—always preserved the same connexions, some- thing like a case would be made out. Doubtless, relative position 529 is an important pomt ; and it is one on which Professor Owen mant festly places great dependence. In his discussion of ‘moot cases of special homology,” it is the general test to which he appeals. The typical natures of the alisphenoid, the mastoid, the orbito- sphenoid, the prefrontal, the malar, the squamosal, &c,, he deter- mines almost wholly by reference to the adjacent nerve-perforations and the articulations with neighbouring bones (see pp. 19 to 72): the general form of the argument being—This bone is to be classed as such or such, decause it is connected thus and thus with these others, which are so and so. Moreover, by putting forth an * ideal typical vertebra,” consisting of a number of elements standing towards each other in certain definite arrangement, this persistency of relative position is manifestly alleged. The essential attribute oi this group of bones, considered as a typical group, is the con- stancy in the connexions of its parts: change the connexions, and the type is changed. but the constancy of relative position thus tacitly asserted, and appealed to as a conclusive test in “ moot cases of special homology,” is clearly negatived by Professor Owen’s own facts. For instance, in the “ideal typical vertebra,” the hemal arch is represented as formed by the two hemapophyses aud the hemal spine; but at p. 91 we are told that ** The contracted hemal arch in the caudal region of the body may be formed by different elements of the typical vertebra: e¢.g., by the para- pephyses (fishes generally) ; by the pleurapophyses (lepidosiren) ; by both pirapophyses and pleurapophyses (Sudis, Lepidosteus), and by hemapo- physes, shortened and directly articulated with the centrums (reptiles and inammals),”’ And further, in the thorax of reptiles, birds, and mammals, “ the heemapophyses are removed from the centrum, and are articulated to the distal ends of the pleurapophyses; the bony hoop being com- pleted by the intercalation of the hemal spine” (p. 82). So that there are jive different ways in which the hemal arch may be formed —four modes of attachment of the parts different from that shown in the typical diagram! Nor is this all. The pleurapophyses “ may be quite detached from their proper segment, and suspended to the hemal arch of another vertebra ;” as we have already seen, the eutire hemal arch may be detached and removed to a distance, sumetimes reaching the length of twenty-seven vertebrae ; and, even more remarkable, the ventral fins ef some fishes, which theoretically belong to the pelvic arch, are so much advanced forward as to be articulated to the scapular arch—‘* the ischium elongating to join the coracoid.” With these admissions it seems to us that relative position and connexions cannot be appealed to as tests of homology, nor as evidence of any original type of vertebra. In no class of facts, then, do we find a good foundation for the hypothesis of an “ideal typical vertebra.” There is no one Con- 530 scivable attribute of this archetypal form which is habitually realised by actual vertebree. The alleged group of true vertebral elements is not distinguished in any specified way from bones not included in it. Its members have various degrees of inconstancy; are rarely all present together; and no one of them is essential. They are severally developed in no uniform way: each of them may arise either out of a separate piece of cartilage, or out of a piece conr- tinuous with that of some other element ; and each may be ossified from many independent points, from one, or from none. Not only may their respective individualities be lost by absence, or by con- fluence with others; but they may be doubled, or tripled, or halved, or may be multiplied in one direction and lost in another. The en- tire group of typical elements may coalesce into one simple bone representing the whole vertebra; and even, as in the terminal piece of a bird’s tail, half-a-dozen vertebrae, with all their many elements, may become entirely lost in a single mass. Lastly, the respective elements, when present, have no fixity of relative position: sundry of them are found articulated to various others than those with which they are typically connected; they are frequently displaced and attached to neighbouring vertebre ; and they are even removed to quite remote parts of the skeleton. It seems to us that if this want of congruity with the facts does not disprove the hypothesis, no such hypothesis admits of disproof. Unsatisfactory as is the evidence in the case of the trunk and tail vertebrae, to which we have hitherto confined ourselves, it is far worse in the case of the alleged cranial vertebree. The mere fact that those who have contended for the vertebrate structure of the skull, have differed so astonishingly in their special interpretations of it, is enough to warrant great doubt as to the general truth of their theory. From Professor Owen’s history of the doctrine of general homology, we gather that Dumeril wrote upon “la téte eonsidérée comme wne vertebre;” that Kielmeyer, ‘instead of calling the skull a vertebra, said each vertebra might be called a skull;” that Oken recognized in the skull three vertebre and a rudiment ; that Professor Owen himself makes out four vertebree ; that Goethe’s idea, adopted and developed by Carus, was, that the skull is composed of siz vertebre; and that Geoffroy St. Hilaire divided it into seven. Does not the fact that different comparative anatomists have arranged the same group of bones into one, three, jour, siz, and seven vertebral segments, show that the mode of de- termination is arbitrary, and the conclusions arrived at faneiful ? May we not properly entertain great doubts as to any one scheme being more valid than the others? And if out of these conflicting schemes we are asked to accept one, ought we not to accept it only on the production of some thoroughly conciusive proof—seme -—. suiad i a” 531 rigorous test showing irrefragably that the others must be wrong and this alone right? Kvidently where such contradictory opinions have been formed by so many competent judges, we ought, before deciding in favour of one of them, to have a clearness of demon- stration much exceeding that required in any ordinary case. Let us see whether Professor Owen supplies us with any such clearness of demonstration, To bring the first or occipital segment of the skuil into corre- spondence with the “ ideal typical vertebra,” Professor Owen argues, in the case of the fish, that the parapophyses are displaced, and wedged between the neurapophyses and the neural spine—removed from the hemal arch and built into the upper part of the neural arch. Further, he considers that the pleurapophyses are teleologi- cally compound. And then, in all the higher vertebrata, he alleges that the hemal arch is separated from its centrum, taken to a dis- tance, and transformed into the scapular arch. Add to which, he says that in mammals the displaced parapophyses are mere processes of the neurapophyses (p. 153): these vertebral elements, typically belonging to the lower part of the centrum, and in nearly all cases confluent with it, are not only removed to the far ends of elements placed above the centrum, but have become exogenous parts of them ! Conformity of the second or parietal segment of the cranium with the pattern-vertebra, is produced thus :—The petrosals are excluded as being partially-ossified sense-capsules, not forming parts of the true vertebral system, but belonging to the ‘ splanchno-skeleton.” A centrum is artificially obtained by sawing in two the bone which serves in common as centrum to this and the preceding segment ; and this though it is admitted that in fishes, where their individualities ought to be best seen, these two hypothetical centrums are not simply coalescent, but connate. Next, a similar arbitrary bisection is made of certain elements of the hemal arches. And then, * the principle of vegetative repetition is still more manifest in this arch than in the occipital one:” each pleurapophysis is double; each hemapophysis is double; and the heemal spine consists of six pieces ! The interpretation of the third and fcurth segments being of the same general character, need not be detailed. The only point calling for remark being, that in addition to the above various modes of getting over anomalies, we find certain bones referred to ihe dermo-skeleton. Now it seems to us, that even supposing no antagonist interpre- tations had been given, an hypothesis reconcilable with the facts only by the aid of so many questionable devices, could not be con- sidered satisfactory ; and that when, as in this case, various com- parative anatomists have contended for other interpretations, the character of this one is certainly not of a kind to warrant the re- jection of the others in its favour; but rather of a kind to make : 32 as doubt the possibility of all such interpretations. The question which naturally arises is, whether by proceeding after this fashion, groups of bones might not be arranged into endless typical forms. If, when a given element was not in its place, we were at liberty to consider it as suppressed, or connate with some neighbouring element, or removed to some more or less distant position ;—if, on finding a bone in excess, we might consider it, now as part of the dermc« skeleton, now as part of the splanchno-skeleton, now as transplantec from its typical position, now as resulting from vegetative repetition, and now as a bone teleologically compound (for these last two are intrinsically different, though often used by Professor Owen as equivalents) ;—if, in other cases, a bone might be regarded as spurious (p. 91), or again as having usurped the place of another ;— if, we say, these various liberties were allowed us, we should not despair of reconciling the facts with various diagrammatic types besides that adopted by Professor Owen. When, in 1851, we attended a course of Professor Owen’s lectures on Comparative Osteology, beginning though we did in the attitude of discipleship, our scepticism grew as we listened, and reached its climax when we came to the skull; the reduction of which to the vertebrate structure, reminded us very much of the interpretation of prophecy. The delivery, at the Royal Society, of the Croonian Lecture for 1858, in which Professor Huxley, confirming the state- ments of several German anatomists, has shown that the facts of embryology do not countenance Professor Owen’s views respecting the formation of the cranium, has induced us to reconsider the verte- bral theory as a whole. Closer examination of Professor Owen's doctrines, as set forth in his works, has certainly not removed the scepticism generated years ago by his lectures. On the contrary, that scepticism has deepened into disbelief. And we venture to think that the evidence above cited shows this disbelief to be warranted. There remains the question—What general views are we to take respecting the vertebrate structure? If the hypothesis of an “ideal typical vertebra” is not justified by the facts, how are we to under- stand that degree of similarity which vertebree display ? We believe the explanation is not far to seek. All that our space’ will here allow, is a brief indication of what seems to us the natura view of the matter. Professor Owen, in common with other comparative anatomists, regards une divergences of individual vertebree from the average form, as due to adaptive modifications. If here one vertebral ele ment is largely developed, while elsewhere it is small—if now the form, now the position, now the degree of coalescence, of a given part varies; it is that the local requirements have involved this change. The entire teaching of comparative osteology implies that 588 differences in the conditions of the respective vertebra necessitate differences in their structures. Now, it seems to us that the first step towards a right conception of the phenomena, is to recognize this general law in its converse application. If vertebre are unlike in proportion to the unlikeness of their circumstances, then, by implication, they will be like in pro- portion to the likeness of their circumstances. While successive segments of the same skeleton, and of different skeletons, are all in some respects more or less differently acted on by incident forces, and are therefore required to be more or less different; they are all, in other respects, similarly acted on by incident forces, and are therefore required to be more or less similar. It is impossible to deny that if differences in the mechanical functions of the vertebre involve differences in their forms; then, community in their mechani- zal functions, must involve community in their forms. And as we know that throughout the Vertebrata generally, and in each vertebrate animal, the vertebree, amid all their varying circumstances, have a certain community of function, it follows necessarily that they will have a certain general resemblance—there will recur that average shape which has suggested the notion of a pattern vertebra. A glance at the facts at once shows their harmony with this conclusion. In an eel or a snake, where the bodily actions are such as to involve great homogeneity in the mechanical conditions of the vertebree, the series of them is comparatively homogeneous. On the contrary, in a mammal or a bird, where there is considerable hetero- geneity in their circumstances, their similarity is no longer so great. And if, instead of comparing the vertebral columns of different animals, we compare the successive vertebree of any one animal, we recognize the same law. In the segments of an individual spine, where is there the greatest divergence from the common mechanical conditions ? and where may we therefore expect to find the widest departure from the average form? Obviously at the two extremities. And accordingly it is at the two extremities that the ordinary struc- ture is lost. Still clearer becomes the truth of this view, when we consider the genesis of the vertebral column as displayed throughout the ascend- ing grades of the Vertebrata. In its first embryonic stage, the spine is an undivided column of flexible substance. In the early fishes, while some of the peripheral elements of the vertebrae were marked out, the central axis was still a continuous unossified cord. And thus we have good reason for thinking that in the primitive verte- brate animal, as in the existing Amphioxus, the notochord was per- sistent. The production of a higher, more powerful, more active creature of the same type, by whatever method it is conceived to have taken place, involved a change in the notochordal structure, (sreater muscular endowments presupposed a firmer internal fulcrum 534 —a less yielding central axis. On the other hand, for tle central axis to have become firmer while remaining continuous, would have entailed a stiffness incompatible with the creature’s movements. Hence, increasing density of the central axis necessarily went hand in hand with its segmentation: for strength, ossification was re- quired; for flexibility, division into parts. The production of ver- tebree resulting thus, there obviously would arise among them a general likeness, due to the similarity in their mechanical conditions, and more especially the muscular forces bearing on them, And then observe, lastly, that where, as in the head, the terminal position and the less space for development of muscles, entailed smaller lateral bendings, the segmentation would naturally be less decided, less regular, and would be lost as we approached the front of the head. But, it may be replied, this hypothesis does not explain all the facts. It does not tell us why a bone whose function in a given animal requires it to be solid, is formed not of a single piece, but by the coalescence of several pieces, which in other creatures are sepa- rate; it does not account for the frequent manifestations of unity of plan in defiance of teleological requirements. This is quite true. But it is not true, as Professor Owen argues respecting such cases, that “if the principle of special adaptation fails to explain them, and we reject the idea that these correspondences are manifestations of some archetypal exemplar, on which it has pleased the Creator to frame certain of his living creatures, there remains only the alterna- tive that the organic atoms have concurred fortuitously to produce such harmony.” This is not the only alternative: there is another, which Professor Owen has overlooked. It is a perfectly tenable supposi- tion that all higher vertebrate forms have arisen by the superposing of adaptations upon adaptations. Hither of the two antagonist cosmo- gonies consists with this supposition. Ii, on the one hand, we con- ceive species to have resulted from acts of special creation; then it is quite a fair assumption that to produce a higher vertebrate animal, the Creator did not begin afresh, but took a lower vertebrate animal, and so far modified its pre-existing parts as to fit them for the new requirements; in which case the original structure would show itself through the superposed modifications. If, on the other hand, we conceive species to have resulted by gradual differentiations under the influence of changed conditions; then, it would mani- festly follow that the higher, heterogeneous forms, would bear traces of the lower and more homogeneous forms from which they were evolved. Thus, besides finding that the hypothesis of an “ideal typical vertebra” is irreconcilable with the facts, we find that the facts are interpretable without gratuitous assumptions. The average com- munity of form which vertebre display, is explicable as resulting 535 from natural caases And those typical similarities which are trace- able under adaptive modifications, must obviously exist if, through- out creation in general, there has gone on that continuous super posing of modifications upon modifications which goes on in every unfolding organism. {I might with propriety have added to the foregoing criticisms, the remark that Professor Owen has indirectly conferred a great benefit by the elaborate investigations he has made with the view of establishing his hypothesis. He has himself very conclusively proved that the teleological interpretation is quite irreconcilable with the facts. In gathering together evidence in support of his own con- ception of archetypal forms, he has disclosed adverse evidence which I think shows his conception to be untenable. The result is that the field is left clear for the hypothesis of Evolution as the only tenable one. | ° A P Pane oe [From the TRANSACTIONS OF THE LINNEAN SoclETY, VOL. XxXY.] XV. On Circulation and the Formation of Wood in Plants. By Hersert SPENCER, Esg. Communicated by Grorce Busk, VE ie Ga Memae oc pl Bre Read Mareh Ist, 1866. Opinions respecting the functions of the vascular tissues in plants appear to make but little progress towards agreement. The suppo- sition that these vessels and strings of partially-united cells, lined with spiral, annular, reticulated, or other frameworks, are carriers of the plant-juices, is objected to on the ground that they often contain air: as the presence of air arrests the movement of blood through arteries and veins, its presence in the ducts of stems and petioles is assumed to unfit them as channels for sap. On the other hand, that these structures have a respiratory office, as some have thought, is certainly not more tenable, since, if the presence of air in them negatives the belief that their function is to dis- tribute liquid, the presence of liquid in them equally negatives the belief that their function is to distribute air. Nor can any better defence be made for the hypothesis which I find propounded, that these parts serve “to give strength to the parenchyma.” Tubes with fenestrated and reticulated internal skeletons have, indeed, some power of supporting the tissue through which they pass; but subes lined with spiral threads can yield extremely little support, while tubes lined with annuli, or spirals alternating with annuli, can yield no support whatever. ‘Though all these types of internal framework are more or less efficient for preventing closure by lateral pressure, they are some of them quite useless for holding up the mass through which the vessels pass ; and the best of them are for this purpose mechanically inferior to the simple cylinder. The same quantity of matter made into a continuous tube would be more effective in giving stiffness to the cellular tissue around it. In the absence of any feasible alternative, the hypothesis that these vessels are distributors of sap claims reconsideration. The objections are not, I think, so serious as they seem. The habitual oe, pee Do eer 537 presence of air in the ducts that traverse wood, can scarcely be held anomalous if when the wood is formed their function ceases. The canals which ramify through a Stag’s horn, contain air after the Stag’s horn is fully developed; but it is not thereby rendered doubtful whether it is the function of arteries to convey blood. Again, that air should frequently be found even in the vessels of petioles and leaves, will not appear remarkable when we call to niind the conditions to which a leaf is subject. Evaporation is going on from it. The thinner liquids pass by osmose out of the vessels into the tissues containing the liquids thickened by evapora- tion. And as the vessels are thus continually drained, a draught is made upon the liquid contained in the stem and roots. Suppose that this draught is unusually great, or suppose that around the roots there exists no adequate supply of moisture. S—= My) PO Ss i 7 2 ? ae SG nae a> aM Mig. the vascular system is relatively imperfect. Besides the compara- tively regular forms of these absorbents, there are forms composed of amorphous masses of fenestrated cells. It should be added that both the regular and irregular kinds are very variable in their num- bers: in some turnips they are abundant, and in others scarcely to be found. Possibly their presence depends on the age of the Turnip. —— = = ae eB Ne XD: ON THE ORIGIN OF THE VERTEBRATE TYPE. [When studying the development of the vertebrate skeleton, there occurred to me the following idea respecting the possible origin of the notochord. 1 was eventually led to omit the few pages of Appendix in which I had expressed this idea, because it was unsupported by develop- menial evidence. The developmental evidence recently discovered, how- ever, has led Professor Haeckel and others to analogous views respecting the affiliation of the Vertebrata on the Molluscoida. Having fortu- nately preserved a proof of the suppressed pages, I am able now to add them. With the omission of a superfluous paragraph, theu are reprinted verbatim from this proof, which dates back to the autumn of 1865, at which time the chapter on “ The Shapes of Vertebrate Skeletons” was written.—December, 1869. | The general argument contained in Chap. XVI. of Part IV., 1 have thought it undesirable to implicate with any conception more speculative than those essential to it; and to avoid so implicating it, I transfer to this place an hypothesis respecting the derivation of the rudimentary vertebrate structure, which appears to me worth considering. Among those molluscoid animals with which the lowest verte- brate animal has sundry traits in common, it very generally happens that while the adult is stationary the larva is locomotive. The locomotion of the larva is effected by the undulations of a tail. In shape and movement one of these young Ascidians is not altogether unlike a Tadpole. And as the tail of the Tadpole disappears when its function comes to be fulfilled by limbs; so the Ascidian larva’s tail disappears when fixation of the larva renders it useless. This disappearance of the tail, however, is not without exception. The Appendicularia is an Ascidian which retains its tail throngh- out life; and by its aid continues throughout life to swim about. Now this tail of the Appendicularia has a very suggestive structure. it is long, tapering to a point, and flattened. rom end to end there runs a mid-rib, which appears to be an imbedded gelatinous rod, not unlike a notochord. Extending along the two sides of 568 APPENDIX. this mid-rib, are bundles of muscular fibres; and its top bears a ganeliated nervous thread, giving off, at intervals, branches to the muscular fibres. In the Appendiculart va this tail, which i is inserted at the lewer part of the back, is bent forwards, so as not to be adapted for propelling the body of the animal head foremost; but the homologous tails of the larval Ascidians are directed backwards, so as to produce forward movement. If we suppose a type like the Appendicularia in the structure and insertion of its permanent tail, but resembling the larval forms in the direction of its tail, it is, I think, not difficulé to see that functional adaptation joined with natural selection, might readily produce a type approximating to that whose origin we are considering. It is a fair assumption that an habitually - locomotive creature would profit by in- creased power of locomotion. This granted, it follows that such further development of the tail-structures as might arise from enhanced function, and such better distribution of them as spontaneous variation might from time to time initiate, would be perpetuated. “What must be the accompanying changes? The more vigorous action of such an appendage implies a firmer insertion into the body; and this would be effected by the pro- longation forwards of the central axis of the tail inte the creature’s back. As fast as there progressed this fusion of the increasingly- powerful tail with the body, the body would begin to partake of its uscillations ; and at the same time that the resistant axis of the tail advanced along the dorsal region, its accompanying muscular fibres would spread over the sides of the body: graduaiiy taking such modified directions and insertions as their new conditions rendered most advantageous. Without further explanation, those who examine drawings of the structures described, will, I think, see that in such a way a tail homologous with that of the Appendicularia, would be likely, in the course of that de- velopment required for its greater efficiency, gradually to encroach on the body, until its mid-rib became the dorsal axis, its gangliated nerve-thread the spinal chord, and _ its muscular fibres the myocommata. Such a development of an appendage into a dominant part of the organism, though at first sight a startling supposition, is not without plenty of parallsls: instance the way in which the cerebral ganglia, originally mere adjuncts of the spinal chord, eventually become the great centres of the nervous system to which the spinal chord is quite subordinate ; or instance the way in which the limbs, small and inconspicuous in fishes, become, in Man, masses which, taken together, outweigh the trunk. It may be added that these familiar cases have a further appropriateness ; for they exhibit higher degrees of that same increasing dominance of the organs of external relation, which the hypothesis itself implies. APPENDIX. 569 Of course, if the rudimentary vertebrate apparatus thus grew into, and spread over, a molluscoid visceral system, the formation of the notochord under the action of alternating transverse strains, did not take place as suggested in § 255; but it does not therefore follow that its differentiation from surrounding tissues was not mechanically initiated in the way described. For what was said in that section respecting the effects of lateral bendings of the body, equally applies to lateral bendings of the tail; and as fast as the developing tail encroached on the body, the body would become implicated in the transverse strains, and the differentiation would advance forwards under the influences originally alleged. Obviously, too, though the lateral muscular masses would in this case have a different history ; yet the segmentation of them would be eventually determined by the assigned causes. For as fast as the strata of contractile fibres, developing somewhat in advance of the dorsal axis, spread along the sides, they would come under the influence of the alternate flexions ; and while, by survival of the fittest, their parts became adjusted in direction, their segmentation would, as before, accompany their increasing massiveness. The actions and reactions due to lateral undulations would still, therefore, be the causes of differentiation, with which natural selection weuld co- operate. o SUBJECT-INDEX. (For this — the Author is indebted to F. Howarp CoLuins, sq, of Edgbaston, Birmingham.) Acacra, foliar organs, 2, 32, 248. Acalephe: motion of, 1, 55; water in, 1, 145. Acari: special creation and effects of, 1, 343; development, 1, 373; direct transformations in, 7, 489; segmenta- tion, 2, 99. Acrogens: morphology of jungerman- niace@, 2, 24-27; growth and develop- ment, 2, 46-53 ; name and growth of, 2,52; tubular structure, 2, 54; sym- metry, 2, 125; inner tissue differentia- tion, 2, 256; vascular system, 2, 263; integration, 2, 276, 383 ; agamogenesis, 2, 421; growth and genesis, 2,430; genesis and development, 442. Actinophrys: aprimary aggregate, 2,78; genesis, 2, 431. Actinozea: multiaxial development, 1, 137; reparative power, 1, 175; diffe- rentiation, 7, 306; integration, 2, 85; symmetry, 2, 172, 174; growth and genesis, 2, 424. Sot: nutrition and genesis, résumé, 2, 470-2; and evolution, 2, 474-8, Adaptation: general truths, 1, 184-199, 190-2; botanical, 7, 184; physiologi- cal, 7, 185-190; psychological, 7, 186, 188, 189; structural, functional, and inter-dependence, 7, 192-6, 197-8, 255 ; social and organic stability, 7, 197-9; résumé, 1, 199; multiplication of effects, 1, 424, 465-6; direct equill- bration, 7, 435-7; natural selection and equilibration, 1, 444-9, 466, 474; of skin and skeleton, 2, 198, 200; outer tissue, 2, 295-9, 380; skin and mucous membrane differentiation, 2, 307-9, 382; vascular system, 2 | 334; osseous, 2, 343; muscular, 2, 360, 384; per- sistence of force and physiological, B. 387; plant multiplication, 2, 391-6; vertebrie development, 2, 532-5. Agamogenesis : of heterogenesis, 7, 211, 273 ; development of offspring, L 217; relation to vegetal growth, 1, 224; physiological units, 7, 288; in acti- nozoa, 2, 85; in hydrozoa, 2, 94; in» nutrition, 2, 163; laws of multiplica- tion, 2,395. (See also Muitiplication). Agaricine: symmetry, 2, 124; tissue differentiation, 2, 239. Agassiz, Prof. L. J. R., zoological classi- fication, 7, 298. Ageregates: integration and orders of, 2, 5; primary vegetal, 2, 14, 74; morphology of vegetal, 2, 15-18, 74-6 primary animal, 2, 77-9, ‘i; : ainda ary animal, 2, 79-83, Wa he tertiary animal, 2, 83-5, 85-7, 111; annulose, 2,97 ; sy mmetry of primary vegetal, op 119-2 22,130; of secondary, 2,122-5; of tertiary, 2, 125-8; morphological differentiation of primary vegetal, 2, 159-61; summary of morphelogical development, 2, 214. Avrimony, floral symmetry, 2, 152, 154 Air: in vegetal tissues, 2, 536-7, 552, 560, 562. Albumen: physical and chemical pro- perties, Z, 12; formula, 17,14; ditfusi- bility, Z, 19; im animal and vegetal tissues, 7, 38. Alcohols: physical and chemical pro- perties, Z, 10-12; transformation into acetic acid, 7, 40. Alge: multicentral development, 7,135; axial development, 2, 136; uniform tissue and function, Z, 156; gamo- genesis in conferve, 1,219; unicellular forms, 2,14; integration in conferva, 2,17; pseudo-foliar and axialdevelop- ment, 2, 20-4; tubular structure, 2, 54; foliar development, 2, 73, 83; branch symmetry, 2, 130; cell meta- morphoses, 2, 160; tissue differentia- tion, 2, 228, 378-9; outer tissue diiferentiation, 2, 235, 239, 379; inner, 2, 255 ; integration, 2,275; indefinite- ness, 2, 278; fexility, 2, 420, 421; sexual genesis, 2, 42%. 429,430; genesis and development, 2, 442. Alimentary canal: fur-tion, 7, 1613 differentiation, 2, 286, %07-9, 310-3 O00 382; gizzard development in birds, | 2, 312; development in ruminants, 2, 314-6; differentiation of liver, 2, 316- 21; muscularity, 2, 355. Allotropism: of organie constituents, 7, 4,9; muscular action, 7, 56. Alloys, melting point of, Z, 276. Alternation of generations (see Gamo- genesis). -Ameba: central development, 7, 134; a primary aggregate, 2,78 ; symmeiry of encysted, 2, 169; genesis, 7, 422. Ammonia: physical properties, 1, 6; chemical properties, 7,9; nerve stimu- lant, 1, 52. Amphibia: classification of, 1, 308; structure and media, 1, 395; scgmen- tation, 2, 109; outer tissues, 2, 293; respiration, ?, 322, 326; Owen on skeleton, 2, 521, 526, 527. Anphioxus: classification, 1, 362; em- bryonic development, 2, 108; genesis of vertebrate axis, 2, 196-9, 199-201, 203 ; development, 2, 533. Anabas scandens, the climbing fish, 1, 392, 394. Anacharis alsinastrum, individuality in, 209. Anzsthetics, local and general effects, 1, a2. Animals: nutrition and molecular re- arrangement, 7, 33-35; nitrogeneous character, 7,37, 38; nitro2zeneous food of carnivorous, 7,45; sensible motion, 1, 54; changes showing life, Z, 72; length and complexity of life, 1, 84; degree of life and environment, 1, 85-8; growth, Z, 108; organization and size, 1, 110-12; growth and nutrition, 7, 112, 119-21, 122, 131; and initial and. final bulks, 7, 115, 127- 31, 132; and structural complexity, 7, 117-9,132; structure, temperature, and self-mobility, 7, 145-30 ; functions, Z, 154-6, 305; functional and structural ; differentiation, 7, 157-60; functional differentiation and integration, 7, 161-4; functional specialization and vicariousness, Z, 163-6; waste in, 7, 169-71, 176, 185; reparative power, Z, 175, 179-82; waste and activity, 1, 175-7; organic polarity and physio- logical units, 1, 182-3, 253; modified adaptability, 7, 188; stability of types, 7,199; whatis unindividual? Z, 203; heterogenesis, growth, and nutrition, ! SUBJECT-INDEX. 1, 228-33, 235-7; homo- and heteroe genesis and natural selection, 7, 2383-7; general truths of heredity, 7, 238-41 ; heredity and breeding, 7, 242, 252; functional alterations, structure and heredity, 1, 246-52, 255 ; variation, 7, 257; domestication and variation, 7, 261, 263; variation and adaptation, 1, 269; in-and-in breeding, 7, 282-4, 289; pure and mixed breeding, 7, 291; classification, 1, 248-304; distribution and migrations, 1, 312-7, 327; natural barriers and distribution, 7, 317-20, 328, 388; distribution in time, 7,320-7, 328; special creation and parasitic, 7, 342; evolution and classification, 2, 358, 359, 364, 471; rudimentary organs in, 7, 386, 387, 472; evoluticn and varied media of, 1, 391-7, 401, 472; KE. Darwin and Lamarck on evolution of, 7, 402-10; solar influence, 1,412, 472; geologic changes affecting, 1, 413-5, 464, 466, 472°; interdepen- dence with plants, 7, 416-8, 426; complexity of influences affecting, J, 418; persistence of species, 1, 428; defensive plant apphances, Z, 437; direct equilibration, Z, 439-41, 442, 466, 474; natural selection and in- direct equilibration, 2, 448-9, 466, 474; natural selection and equilibra- tion, 1, 457-62, 474; importance of natural sel+-etion 7, 468; distribution and age of plants and animals, 2, 230; muscular colour, 2, 356-9; laws of multiplication, 2, 391-6; rhythm in numbers, 2, 399; law of weights and dimensions, 2,414; growth and asexual genesis, 2, 422-6; growth and sexual genesis, 2,431-6; nutritionand genesis, 2, 458. Annelida: phosphorescence, 7, 47; seg: mentation, 2, 91-3; embryonic deve- lopment, 2, 106; bilateral symmetry, 2, 180-3; genesis, 2, 425, 433. Aanuloida: development, 1, 372; i:te- gration, 2, 94-7; symmetry, 2, 177-80; genesis, 2, 425. Annulosa: axial development, 7, 136, 137 ; definition, Z, 307 ; classification, 1, 363; segmentation, 2, 9i-3, 111; integration, 2, 94-7, 108; unit and agerevate, 2,97; embryonic develop- ment, 2,107; bilateral symmetry, 2, 180-3; symmetry of vertebruta, 2, 186-9; segmental differentiation, -— SUBJECT-INDEX. DE 189-91; unintegrated function in planaria, 2, 365; genesis, 2, 425, 432; development and genesis, 2, 443; nutrition and genesis, 2,466. (See also Articulata). Anthropomorphism, former prevalence of, 1, 335. Ants, nutrition and genesis, 1, 467. Aphides: axial development, 1, 137; individuality, 7,206, 207; pseudo-par- thenogenesis, 7, 214; development of new individua!s, 7,217; heterogenesis, 1, 228; nutrition and genesis, 2, 455, 466. Arachnida: avoidance of danger, 1, 73; oviparous homogenesis, Z, 211; de- velopment, 7, 371; integration and homology, 2, 99-102, 1U8; bilateral symmetry, 2, 181. Arcelia: symmetry, 2,169; outer tissue differentiation, 2, 291. Arm: development of human, 7, 140; functional vicariousness of human, Z, 166. Army, morphological analogy, 2, 6. Arteries (see Vascular system). Arthropoda (see Articulata). Articulata: integration and homology, 2, 99-102, 108; embryonic develop- ment, 2, 106, 107; bilateral symmetry, 2, 180-3; genesis, 2, 426, 433. Ascidians: integration, 2, 86, 88, 89; symmetry, 2, 176, 186; origin of vertebrate type, 2, 567. Assimilation, compared with reasoning, 1, 62-8. Asteroidea, radial symmetry, 2, 178. Astronomy: and growth, JZ, 107; Schleiden on individuality, Z, 202; evolution, 7, 347, 350; classification, 1,359; rhythm of, and organic change, 1, 411-8, 473; law of equilibration, 1, 433; ‘‘ mechanical theory,” Z, 490 ; co-operation of structure and function, 2 3. Asymmetry (see Morphology). Alavism: occurrence of, 1, 248, 252; digital variation, 7, 258-60. Atoms: mechanically considered, 1, 14; etherial wnduiations and oscillations of, 1, 29-33. Axillary buds, origin and development, 2, 61-5. Axis: “neutral” of mechanics, 2, 193 ; genesis of vertebrate, 2, 195-9, 208. (See a/so Development). BaER, K. E. vow: formula of, 1, 141-4, 363-9, 378; zoological classification, 1, 301 ; on animal transitions, 7, 492. Balanophore: wax on, 2, 244; inner tissue, 2, 257. Bark: varied development, 2, 229-31 ; physiological differentiation, 2, 231- 3, 240, 379, 380. Bat, expenditure and genesis, 2, 452. Bean, vascular system, 2, 542, 560. Bees (see Insects). Begoniacee : multiplication, 7,180, 181, 253, 2, 422; mdividuality, 7, 207; de- velopment from scales, 7,221; symme- try, 2,144, 150-1; development, 2,254, Berkeley, Rev. M. J.: indetiniteness of alge and fungi, 2,278 ; of mosses and ferns, 2, 279. Bilateral symmetry (see Morphology). Biliverdine, function cf, 2, 317, 320, 370. Binary compounds: physical properties, 1, 5-7; chemical properties, Z, 7-10 ; combining power and atomic weights, (eee Biology: definition and divisions, 1, 94- 6; organic structural phenomena, J, 96-8; also functional, Z, 98-100; actions and reactions of function and structure, 1, 100-2; genesis, 1, 102; limited knowledge of, 1, 103 ; evolu- tion, Z, 347, 349. Birds: growth and expenditure of foree, 1, 114,127; size of egg and adult, 7, 116; temperature of, 1, 146, 147; self-mobility, 1, 147; functional and structural differentiation, 2, 157; food of starving pigeon, 1. 170; vivi- parous, 1, 211; heredity and pigeon breeding, 7, 242; atavism in pigeon, 1, 252; osseous variation in pig2on, 1, 258; classification, 7, 308; distri- bution and migrations, 7, 315, 316, 319; distribution in time, 7, 326; Darwin on petrels, 1,368 ; rudimentary teeth, 1, 370; vertebre, 1, 383, 2, 533; feather development, 7, 389; habits of water-ouzel, 1, 397; migra- tion, 1, 412; egg-shells and direct equilibration, 2, 440; bones and direct equilibration, 1, 441; sexual selection, 2, 253 ; wing spurs, 2, 296 ; outer tissue differentiation, 2, 300, 381; alimentary canal development, 2, 312, 314; muscular colour and activity, 2, 356-60 ; nutrition, 2, 413; cost of genesis, 2, 416; growth and 5 oon (8 genesis, 2, 434, 437; heat expenditure and genesis, 2, 448-8, 453; muscular expenditure and genesis, 2, 448-51, 453; mammalian fertility, 2, 449; eggs "of wild and tame, 2, 457 ; reat: i- tion of blackbird and linnet, 2,476; Owen on skeleton of, 2, 528, 529, 530, tlainville, H. M. D. de, definition of life, 1, 60, 74. Dlister, nervous action in, 2, 299. Blood: similarity of iron peroxide, 7, 17; segregation of abnormal consti- tuents, 1, 152 ; changed by disease, J, 177, 484; assimilative power and or- ganic repair, J, 17 os respiratory tissue differentiation, 2, 292-5; pres- sure in mammalia, 2, 329, 330. (See also Vascular system). Boismont, A.B.de, human fertility, 2, 484. Bone: Botany : adaptability, Fie be Ae 200- 1; function and weight, 1, 246-5 mam- malian cervical vertebre, 7, 309; evolution and vertebral column, JZ, 382; partial development, 7, 385 ; size of head as influencing, 7, 424, 451-3; direct equilibration and strength, 7, 441; skull development, 2, 205; theory of supernumerary, 2, 206; membranous, cartilaginous, and osseous states, 2,207; differentiation, 2, 298, 334-46 ; integration, 2, 375; Owen’s theory of vertebrate skeleton, 2, 517-35. influence of heat on plants, 7, 27 ; effect of solar rays, 1, 28-33, 412, 472; plants non-nitrogenous, 1, 37 ; fungi nitrogenous, Z, 38; generation of heat in plants, 2, 44; phospho- rescence, 1, 46; vegetal electricity, 1,48; sensible plant motion, 1, 53-5 ; vital plant changes, Z, 67,68 ; changes showing life, 1, 72, 75; crystalli- zation and vegetal life, 7, 78; vital adjustments, 7, 83; length and com- plexity of life, Z, 84, 85 ; animal and vegetal biology, 1, 96; growth, 2, 108 ; protophytic structure, 7, An8:; organization and growth, 7, 110, 117- 9,132; growth and nutrition, 7, 112, 119-21, 130, 131; relation of initial to final bulks, 7, 115, 132; limits to growth, 7, 125; growth and expendi- ture, 7, 130, 132; central protophytic development, Z, 134; insubordinate multicentral development, JZ, 135; exial development, Z, 186, 211; uni- aod multi-axial development, 7, 136, a SUBJECT-INDEX, 138; bud and leaf development, f, 128-41; weight, temperature, and sel f- mobility, ee 145- 50; function, Z, 154-6 ; functional and structural come plexity, 1,156; vicarious function, 1, 165-6; waste and repair, 1,169, 176 multiplication of begoniacee, 1, 180, 181, 253 ; organic polarity and physio- logical units, 7, 182-3, 253; adapta- tion, 7, 184; what is an individual ? 1, 201-3, 207, 208; homogenesis ex- ceptional, Z, 211; heterogenesis, 1, 211, 212; parthenogenesis, 7, 214-6 ; disintegration of genesis, J, 216-83 reproductive tissue structurally un- differentiated, 7,218-24; gamogenesis _ in protophyta, 1, 219; relation of nutrition to growth and gamogenesis, 1, 224-8, 232, 235-7, 2, 30; homo- logues of ovules, 1, 228; nutrition and growth of eee ds 233 ; natural eo and homo- ard hetero-genesis, , 233-7; general truths of heredity, Z 233-41; heredity and “change of habit,” 1, 245 ; and “sports,” 7, 246 ; me 1, 257; cultivation and variation, Z, 260, 261, 262-4; cross fertilization, Z, 278; self-fertilization, 1, 280-2 ; classification, 7, 295-8, 301; distribution and migration, 7, 312-7, 327; natural barriers and distrébuticn, 1, 317-20, 328, 388; distribution in time, 7, 320-7, 328; special creation and parasitism, 7, 343; evolution hypothesis, 2, 349; evolution and classification, 7, 358, 364, 471 ; Davwin on floral morphology, 7, 384; rudi- mentary organs, J, 886, 387, 472; European plants in New Zealand, Z, 389; distribution, Z, 389-91, 472; varied media, 1, 396, 472; E. Darwin and Lamarck on plant evoluticn, 7, 402-10; geologic changes affecting, 1, 413-5, 472; interdependence of auimals and plants, 7, 416-8, 426; complexity of influences on plants, 1, 418 ; equilibration, nutrition, defence, and fertilization, 7, 437-9; natural selection and indirect equilibration, Z, 446, 448, 474; dimorphism, 7, 448 ; seed distribution, 7, 461; importance of natural selection, 7, 468; aquatic and terrestrial conditions, 2, 243 natural selection and nutrition, 2, 48; floral symmetry, 2, 117; wood de- velopment, 2, 258-62, 268-71, 272, SUBJECT-INDEX. 636-66 ; adaptation and multiplica- tion, 2, 391-6; rhythm in numbers, 2, 399; growth and asexual genesis, 2, 419-22; growth and sexual genesis, 2, 428-81; expenditure, 2, 446 ; hor- ticulture, nutrition, and genesis, 2, 456; tree development, 2, 522; cir- culation and wood formation, 2, 536- 61; dye permeability and circulation, 2, 538-48, 546-50, 553, 555; résumé on circulation and wood formation, @, 561-6. (See also Multiplication, Morphology, and Physiology.) Bothriocephalus, development, 2, 466. Botrytis: uni-cellular, 2, 15; symme- try, 2, 122. Brachiopoda (see Molluscoida). Brain: naturel selection and evolution, 1, 469; size in civilized and uncivil- ized, 2, 502. Bramble: leaf development, 2, 28-38 ; leaf symmetry, 2, 139. Branches (see Botany and Morphology). Branchie (see Respiratory system). Breeding: heredity, 1, 242 ; in-and-in, 7, 282-4, 289 ; pure and mixed, 7, 2U1. Bricis, changed equilibrium shown by, 1, 36, 40. Buds: development of axillary, 2, 61-5 ; effects of nutrition, 2, 7. Cactace®: foliar and axial develop- ment, 2, 37-46 ; differentiation im, 2, 240, 241, 259, 266; vascular system, 2, 265 ; dye permeability and circula- tion, 2,540, 541; wood formation, 2, 544, 546, 547, 559. Canadians, nutrition and genesis, 2, 482. Cancer: cesophageal, 2, 311; and vas- cular system, 2, 334. é Caoutchouc: analogy from, 2, 283, 340; leaf structure, 2, 558. Capillarity, and vegetal vascular system, 2, 262, 269, 537, 539, 554, 556, 561-5. Capilleries (see Vascular system). Carbon: chemical and physical proper- ties, 1,3-5, 20,22; binary compounds, Z, 5; 8,9; ternary, 1, 10-12; quar- ternary, 1, 12-14, 23. Carbonic acid: properties, 1, 6, 7, 9; excreted by animais, 7, 170; ditusi- bility, 2, 319. Carbonic oxide, properties, 1, 5, 7. Carpenter, Dr. W. B.: on functional specialization, 1, 164; amphioxus, 1, | 69 o7T9 863 ; macrocystis, 2, 430; nutrition and reproductive function, 2, 439. Cartilage (see Bone). Catalysis, and vital metamorphosis, 7, 36, 41. ; Cell: evolution and doctrine of, 2, 10- 13, 77; morphological differentiation, 2, 159-61; animai morphology, 2, 210-12; morphological summary, 2, 215; vegetal tissue ditferentiation, 2, 231-3, 379; vascular development, 2, 262-8, 381. Centipede, bilateral symmetry, 2, 181-3. Cephalopoda: bilateral symmetry, 2, 186; vascular system, 2, 331. Cercarie (see Entozoa). Cereus, tissue differentiation, 2, 259, 266. Cestoda (see Entozoa). Chaja, wing spurs, 2, 296. Change, and definition of life, 2, 62-71. Chemistry: properties of organic ele- ments, 1, 3-5, 20, 22; of binary com- pounds, Z, 7-10; ternary, 7, 10-12; quaternary, 1, 12-14, 23; etherial undulations and atomic oscillation, 7, 29-33 ; chemical affinity and organic change, 7, 33-5, 35-41 ; oxidation and generation of heat, Z, 43-6, 57; gene- ration of nerve force, 1, 49-53, 57 ; physiology and organic, 1, 98; flesh constituents, Z, 125; composition of organisms and environment, J, 145 ; organic development and differential assimilation, 7, 151-2; chemical units, 1, 182; primitive ideas of elements, Z, 333 ; evolution of organic compounds, 1, 479-84, 486. Chesnut, leaf symmetry, ?, 134, 138. Chiton: simulation of segmentation, 2, 104, 105 ; symmetry, 2, 185. Chlorophyll: nutrition and absence of, 2,70; function, 2, 246. Circle, and evolution hypothesis, 7, 348. Circulatory system (see Vascular sys- ten). Cirrhipedia, reproductive capacity, 2 417. Civilization: environment and degree of life, 7, 87; human evolution aud genesis, 2, 501-3. Cladophora: integration, 2, 17; pseud- axial development, 2, 20. Classification : subjective conception, £, 59; two purposes of, 7,292; agracual process, 1, 293; botanical, 1, 295-6, 301, 304; zoological, 7, 298-804; in- 580 complete equivalence of groups, I, 304, 361, 364, 471; group attributes, 1, 305 3; the truths interpreted, 1, 38- 10; ethnologic and linguistic evolu- tion, 1, 356-8, 360, 363; crganic evolutior, 7, 358, 363,471; differences in king and degree, 1, 359-61; former structural similarity, JZ, 362, 364; Von Baer’s formula, 1, 366, 471; organic, not uniserial, 2, 102. Classification of the Sciences, The, and evolution and dissolution, 2, 5. Clay, physiological analogy from, 2, 283. Clover: flower and axial development, 2, 36; symmetry, 2, 137. Coal, social effects of supply, 1, 195-6, 197-8. Cocoa-nut, growth and genesis, 2, 437. Cod: ovaof, 2,415; growth and genesis, 2, 483. Codium: symmetry, 2, 122 ; ferentiation, 2, 228. Celenterata: effect of shock on hydro- zoa, 1,55; changes in polype, 7, 76; axial development, Z, 136, 137; selt- mobility, 7, 147 ; functional differen- tiation, 7, 157, 306; vicarious junc- tion, 7, 165, 166 ; mnutrition, 7, 169; reparative power, 1, 175, 180; indivi- duality, 1, 203, 205, 207; hetero genesis, 1, 212, 217, 235; negative disintegration in hudrozoa, 1, 216; reproductive tissue, J, 221, 229 ; dif- ferentiation in hydrozoa, ye 306 ; ; clas- sification, 7, 363 ; functional co-ordi- nation, 7, 368 ; development, 1, 372 ; development of detached parts, 2, 72 ; integration, 2, 82, 94, 97,111; gem- mation, 2, 83; tertiary aggregate, 2, 84, 88, 111; radial symmetry, 2, 171 ; symmetry of compound, 2, 174-6; cegmental differentiation, 2,190; phy- sidlogical eee T! on in hydra and analogy, 2, 283 ; tissue reduplication, 2, 284-6, 382; outer tissue differentia- tion, 2,291 ; osmosis in hydra, 2,328; vascular system in hydra, 2, 330, 368 ; asexual genesis, 2, 424; growth and sexual genesis, 2, 432; development and genesis, 2, 442; nutrition and genesis, 2, 455. Colloids: T. Graham on, 7, 15-8; diffu- sibility, 7, 18-21; organic, 21, 23, 24; plisbility and elasticity, 7, 25; capil- lary atlinity, 7, 26; isomerism, 7, 56; instability, 7,287 ; molecular mobility tissue dif- SUBJECT-INDEX. and diffusibility, 2, 318; nerve tissue differentiation, 2, 346-51, 352; mus- cular differentiation, 2, 351-5. Colour: sensation of, J, 51; ganic, 2, 71, 249; light and vegetal, 2, 245, 246; floral fertilization, 2, 249-53; sexual selection, 2, 233, activity and muscular, 2, 356-60. Composite, floral symmetry, 2, 157. Comte, A., definition of life, 1, 74, Conferve (see Alge). Conjugatee (see Alga) Consumption, hereditary transmission, 1, 250: Correspondence, use of word, 1, 79. Cow-parsnip (see Heracleum). Crab (see Crustacea). Creation (see Special creation). Crinoidea, symmetry, 2, 177. Crocodile, growth, 7, 125, 126, 231. Cruciferae, floral symmetry, 2, 149, 155. Crustacea: homogenesis, 1, 211; hetero genesis and nutrition in daphnia, 1, 229-30; growth and genesis, 1. 231 3 development of lernee, 1, 296 ; hermit crab parasite, 7, 313; ‘amphibious and terrestrial, 7, 317, 393-4; retrograde development, Z, 371; segmentation, 1, 380; Darwin on jaws and legs, 1, 333 ; survival of cirrhipedia, 1, 429 ; renewal of limbs, 27, 723 integration and homology, 2, 99-102, 108; bi- lateral symmetry, 2, 181-3; eyes, 2, 303 ; dermal structure of hermit-crab, 2, 3U8, 380; fertility, 2, 433; nutri- tion ad genesis, 2, 464. Crystalloids: Prof. Graham on, 7, 15-8 diifusibility, 1, 18-21 ; 3 organic, 2, 21— —4, Crystals: of “storm glass,” 1; Tee growth, 1, 107, 108, 109; segregation, i, AST, 152, 177, 179, 181 ; equiibra- tion, 7, 274; physiological units and polarity, 7, 484-92; time and forima- tion, 2, 73. Cube, bilateral symmetry, 2, 117. Cuttle fish, individuality of hectocotylus, 1, 207. Cuvier, Baron G. L. C. F. D., zoological classification, 7, 289. Cyanogen, physical and chemical proper- ties, 7, 6, 8, 9. Cyclicthys, dermal structure, 2, 283. phenoe Daphnia, heterogenesis and nutrition, 2, 229-380. SUBJECT-INDEX, 581 Darwin, C.: Origin of Species, 1, 101; natural selection and function, 7, 246 ; atavism, 7, 252; osseous variations in pigeons, 7, 258; plant variation and domestication, 7, 262; “ spontaneous variation,” 7, 264, 480; plant fertiliza- tion, 2, 278; intercrossing and self- fertilization, 7, 281,282; intercrossing, 1, 284; plant fertilization and distri- bution, 7,313; habits of birds, 7, 316; distribution and natural barriers, 7, 318, 388; disappearance and non-re- appearance of species, 1, 322: distri- bution in time and space, 7, 320; linguistic classification, 1, 357; classi- fication of organisms, 1, 358; classifi- cation and descent, Z, 364; on petrels, 1, 368; suppression of organs, 1, 370 ; development of cirrhipedia, 1, 371; jaws and legs of crustacea, 1, 383; aborted organs, 1, 386; vegetal distri- bution, 7,390; opinions of E. Darwin and Lamarck, 7,403; natural selection and indirect equilibration, 1, 444-9, 466; changes without natural selec- tion, 1, 449-57; A. R. Wallace, Z, 469; floral fertilization, 2, 153, 250, 571; sexual selection, 2, 253; attach- ment of climbing plants, 2, 259; vegetal fructification, 2, 277; aniinal sterility and domestication, 2, 4651; | natural selection of, 2, 5U0. Darwin, Dr. E., modifiability oforganisms, 1, 402, 404-9. Death: and vital correspondence, 1, 83, 88; only limit to vegetal erowth, if, 125; physiological integration, 25 366, 385; cause of natural, 2, 393; relation to births, Buon h. Definiteness: of vital change, 1, 68-71, 88, 91; developmental, 7, 150; fune- tional, 7,168; segregation of evolution, 1, 426-8, 429-31. Definition, difficulties o', Z, 59, 2, 10. Dendrobium (see Orchids). Oesmidiacee : unicellular, 2, 14; linear and cer.tial aggregation, 2, 16; aol selection and symmetry, 2 1195120; morphological differentiation, 2, 160 ; tissue, 2, 226; genesis, 2, 420, 429. Development: an increase of structure, 1,133, 2,440; primarily central, Z, 133, 137; uni- and multi-central, 1, 134, 135, 187, 1388; axial, 7, 185, 138; uni- and multi-axial, 7, 186-7, 1388; a chanze to coherent definite hetero- geneity, 7, 138-41, 151; Von Baevr’s formula, Z, 141-4; individual diffe- rentiationfrom environment, 7, 145-50; cell formation, 7, 182; discontinuous, and agaimogenesis, 7,215; Prof. Hux- ley’s classification, 1, 215; direct and indirect, 1, 371-8;- continuous anl discontinuous vegeial, 2,49; summary of physiological, 2, 377-88; nutrition and genesis, résumé, 2, 470-2; evolu- tion, 2, 474-8; commencement of genesis, 2, 479; of vertebrate limbs, 2,522. (See also Multiplication). Development hypothesis, The, arguments from, 1, 338, 348. Dialects (see Language). Dialysis, and diffusibility, 7, 19, 20. Diastase, decomposition of, 1, 36, 37. Diatomacee: unicelluiary forms, 7, 14; aggregation, 2, 15; natural selection and SB easy 1,120; tissue, 2, 226; genesis, 2, 420, 428. Diiferentiation (see Morphology and Physiology). Diffilugia: primary aggregate, 2, 78; symmetry, 2,169; outer tissue dilfe- rentiation, 2, 291. Diffusion, of colloids and erystalloids, 1, 18-20; 2, 318. aS and obesity, 2, 459-62; fer- tility, 2, 487. Diphues: individuality, 7,203; symmetry, 4, 17d. Disease: segregation of blood constitu- ents, 2, 152; blood changes from, J, 177, 484; heredity, 1, 244, 250, 252; special creation, 1, 335, 342; dermal structure, 2, 289 ; exudation of a cropsy, 2, 298; hyper trophy and vascula system, 2, 299; intestinal muscular hypertrophy, 2, 312; indigestion and alimentary canal development, 2, 315 ; jaundice and biliverdine, 2, 3817, 321; localization of exCrelian 2,319; membranes of croup, 2, 333; osseous differentiation in rickets, 2, 343; jaundice and functional specialization, 2, 370; fatty degeneration, 2, 46°. Disintegration, physiological (sze Phy- siology). Distoma: metagenesis, 1, 213; disin- tegration of genesis, 1, 216. Distribution: the two kinds, 7, 311; and migration of plants and animals, 1, 312-7, 327; natural barriers, J, 317-20, 327, 388; of animals and 052 plants in time, 7,320-7, 328; botanical, in New Zealand, Z, 389; region and organism, Z, 889-91, 401; through varied media, Z, 391-7, 401, 472; past and present organic forms, JZ, 399-401, 472; vegetal and animal complexity, 2, 280. Division of labour, physiological, (see Physiology). Dog: iives of tortoise and, 1, 84, 85; heredity and kabits, 7, 247; abnormal digits, 7,262; expenditure and genesis, 2, 452; nutrition and genesis, 2, 458. Domestication: animal and vegetal variation, 1, 260-2, 264; and fertility (see Multiplication). Doubleday, E., on nutrition and genesis, 2, 483-5. Dropsy (see Disease). Drosera: individuality, £, 208; prolife- rous growth, 2, 71. Du Bois-Reymond, E. H., electricity from muscles and nerves, /, 47. Dualism, and evolution, J, 491. Dye: tissue absorption, 2, 262; vegetal circulation and staining, 2, 535-43, 546-50, 553, 555. Ear, development of vertebrate, 2, 204, 306. Farth, climatic rhythm and organic change, J, 411-3, 473. Earth-worm, bilateral symmetry, 2, 182, 183. Echinococcus (see Entozoa). Echinodermata, symmetry, 2, 177-80. Ectoderm: functional differentiation, 7, 158, 159; functional vicariousness, 7, 165. Effects, multiplication of : variation, J, 265, 269; organic evolution, 1, 423-6, 428, 430, 465, 473 ; morphological de- velopment, 2, 7-9, 216; physiological differentiation, 2, 383-4, 385. Eggs (see Embryology). Electricity: genesis in organic matter, Z, 47-9, 57; muscular action, 7, 56. Klephant, growth and genesis, 2, 439. Embryology: as aiding biology, 1, 97; simulation of growth, 1, 108; initial and fina] organic bulks, Z, 115, 128, 132; foetal flesh constituents, 7, 125; human arm development, 7,140; Von Baer’s formula, 7, 141-4, 365-9, 378 ; embryonic heat, 2, 149; spherical SUBJECT-INDEX. organic form, 7, 149; functional diffe. rentiation, 2, 159; individuality, 2, 204; unspecialized reproductive tissue, 1, 219-24, 254; changes following impregnation, J, 223; nutrition and vegetal growth, 1, 224-8, 235-7 ; and animal growth, 7, 228-33, 2385-7; physiological units and heredity, 1, 253-6 ; variation and parental fune- tional condition, 1,261; physiological units and variation, Z, 264-7, 267-8, 269-70; fertilized and unfertilized ova, 1,277; hermaphrodism, 1, 278-9, 250; animal and vegetal self-fertili- zation, 1, 279-82, 290; in-and-m breeding, 1, 282-4, 289; eggs of entozoa, 1, 297; evolution hypo- thesis, J, 349, 351, 471; wetrel de- velopinent, 1, 368; substitution and suppression of organs, 1, 869-71, 378, 384; direct and indirect development, 1, 371-8; “size of ova and develops ment, 1, 373; egg-shell function, J, 440; direct transformations and pliye siological units, 1, 489; transtorma- tion of blastema, 2, 18; arrest of growth and innutrition, 2, 70; de- velopment of dorsibranchiata, and tuli- cole, 2,92; annulosa, 2,94; adaptive vertebrate segmentation, 2, 105-10, 111, 208 ; animal cell morphology, 2, 210; lung development, 2, 321, 322; mammalian ova maturation, 2, 333 ; movements of ova, 2, 316, 354; modi- fications in mole, 2, 384; genesis and nutrition, 2,404, 405; fish ova, Z, 418, 433 ; cost of genesis, 2, 415-6 ; 1um- ber of birds’ eggs, 2, 435, 457; heat and genesis, 2, 447, 453; muscular expenditure and genesis in bids, 2, 448-51, 453; vertebrate limb develop- ment, 2,522; ossification in vertebrates, 2, 525 ; Owen’s vertebrate theory, 2, 532; development of vertebra, 2, 533, (See also Multiplication). Endoderm: functional differentiation, 7, 158, 159; functional vicariousuess, 2, 1¢5. Endogens: mode of growth, 2, 56-8, 65-9, 75, 165; growth and genesis. 2, 430; physiological integration, 2, 276, 383 Entozoa: metagenesis, 1, 213; sel{-fer- tilization, 1, 280; eggs, 1, 297; dis- tribution, 7,314; and special creation, 1, 342-8; development, 1,378 ; direct z SUBJECT-INDEX. transformation, 7, 489; integration, 2,94; genesis, 2, 425; nutrition and genesis, 2, 465. Environment: degree of life and com- plexity of, 1, 85-8 ; relation to organic structure and function, 7, 145-80. Eolis : branchie, 2, 105 ; outer tissue, 2, 293. Epidermis (see Skin). Epilepsy, and heredity, Z, 251. Epithelium: reproductive tissue, 7, 221; “pavement” and “cylinder,” 2, 211. £pizoa: development ot lerneae, 1, 296; distribution, 1, 314; special creation and effects of, 1, 348; nutrition and genesis, 2, 464. ; s:guilibration : variation and law of, 1, 263, 270; molecular arrangement, 1, 274-8 ; of organic change, 1, 285, 462, 474; direct and indirect, 7, 432-5; adaptation and direct, 1, 435-7, 466, 474; nutrition, defence, and fertiliza- tion of plants, 7, 437-9; direct, of animals, 7, 439-41, 442, 466, 474; natural selection and indirect, 7, 443-9, 466,474; of natural selection, 7, 457- 62, 469, 474; increasing importance of direct, 7, 468; tissue ditferentia- tion, 2, 227; functional, 2, 381-7; laws of multiplication, 2, 391-6; of forces acting on species, 2, 397-9, 410; human and social evolution, 2, 507. (See also Natural selection). Ethnology: heredity, 7, 240, 248 ; plas- ticity of mixed races, 7, 291; primi- tive ideas, Z, 333; evolution and classification, Z, 356-8, $63; natural selection, Z, 468. Luphorbiacee: foliar and axial de- velopment, 2, 36-46; physiological differentiation, 2, 240; dye perimea- bility and circulation, 2, 540; wood formation, 2, 544, 546, 547; foliar vascular system, 2, 558-61, 565. Evaporation: organic change, 1, 27; vegetal circulation, 2, 556. Evolution: definitions of life, 7, 89-98 ; implies growth and development, 1, 107, 183; formula supported by de- velopment, Z, 138-41, 150 ; shows life prior to organizution, 7, 167 ; formula supported hy function, Z, 168; sta- bility of species, 7, 199, 428, 430; individuality, 7,204; genesis, heredity, aad variation resulting from, Z, 291; hypcthesis of special creation, 1. 331, 583 344; derivation, 7, 846, 355, 470; gradual development of hypothesis, J, 345-8, 355; cirele and straight line, 1, 348; conceivability, Z, 348-51, 399; support from direct evidence, 1. 351-3, 355; malevolence not im- plied by, 7, 353-5, 355; Von Baer’s formula, 2, 365-9, 378; substitu- tion and suppression of organs, J, 369-71, 378, 384; segmentation of arliculata, 1, 880-2; vertebral column development, 1, 382-4; rudimentary organs, 1, 384-7, 472; vegetal anl animal changes of media, 1, 391-7, 472; considered historically, 2, 402-4, 408-10; instability of the homo- geneous, a cause, 1, 421-38, 428, 465 ; multiplication of effects, 1, 423-6, 429-31, 465 ; segregation, and hetero- geneity and definiteness of, 7, 426-8, 429-31, 465; natural selection and general doctrme, 1, 457-62, 474; classification, embryology, morpho- logy, and distribution, 7, 471-2; in- organic and the System of Philosophy, 1, 479; ‘‘spontaneous generation,” 7, 479-84,485; materialism and dualism, 1, 490-2 ; dissolution and problems of morphology, 2, 4-6; morphology and formula, 2, 7-9, 2138-7 ; difficulties of definition, 2, 10; cell-doctrine, 2. 10-13, 77; first plants unicellular 2,14; résumé of vegetal morphology, 2, 74-6; physiclogical problems, 2, 221-5; tissue differentiation, 2, 226-8, 878; race and individual multiplica- tion, 2, 408-10; declining fertility of, 2,411, 501-3 ; individuation and gene- sis, 2, 474-8; human life, prospective, 2, 494-7; torces influencing human, 2, 497-500 ; future of population, 2, 504-7; self-sufficingness of, 2, 507 ; vertebral, 2, 532-8. Excretion, localization of, 2, 319-21. Exogens: growth, 2, 58-61, 65-9, 75; outer stem and leaf tissues, 2, 240; pliysiological integration, 2, 276, 383; growth and genesis, 2, 430 Expenditure (see Multiplication). Eye, the: waste and repair, 1, 173-4; transmission of defects, Z, 244; use and disuse, 1, 247, 249; migration in pleuronectide, 82, 188; differentia- tion, 2, 303-5. 584 Fats, the: physical and chemical pro- perties, Z, 1U-12 ; non-nitrogenous, 7, 38 ; action of bile, 2, 317. Feathers, development, 1, 385; 2, 299- 302. Feet, heredity and size, 7, 248. Ferments, changes and _ nitrogenous character of, 7, 35, 37, 39. Ferns: foliar development and nutrition, 2,73; inner tissue differentiation, 2, 256; indefiniteness, 2, 279; genesis, 2, 421, 442. Fertility (see Multiplication). Ficus, foliar structure, 2, 558, 565. Fingers: development of human, 1,140; heredity and abnormal, 1, 243, 252, 258-60 ; abnormal number, Z, 385. Fish: sizes of ova and adult, Z, 115; growth of pike, 7, 126, 231 ; tempera- ture, 1, 146, 147; self-mobility, Z, 147; alimentation, Z, 170, 2, 314; symmetry, 7, 188; genesis, 7,211; 2, 415,416; growth and genesis, /, 231; 2, 433; classification, 1, 308 ; change of media, 7, 317, 392; distribution in time, 2, 324, 325; the climbing, 7, 392, 394; migrations, 7,412; dermal structure, 7, 440; 2, 288, 300-2, 380; segmentation, 2, 109; bilateral svm- metry, 2, 186-9; eye of p/euronectida, 2,188; genesis of vertebrate axis, 2, 195-9, 202-4; ossification of palzeozoie, 2, 201; respiratory organs, 2, 322-7 ; activity and muscular colour, 2, 356- 60; Owen on skeleton, 2, 521, 526, 527-9, 531, 533. Flowers, shape of (see Morphology). Food (see Nutrition). Foraminifera: primary aggregate, 2, 78, 111; progressing integration, 2, 80-3, 111; symmetry, 2, 170. Force : action on like and uniike units, 1,5; expenditure and organic growth, 1, 121-6, 131, 182; functional ac- cumulation, transfer, and expenditure, 1, 154-6, 306; waste and expenditure, 1, 17C-2 ; conception of, 7,491; distri- bution during strain, 2,192-5 ; persis- tence cf (see Persistence of force). Fossils (see Paizeontology). Fowls (see Birds). Foxglove: abnormai development, 1, 226, 228; 2,36; floral distribution, 2, 126; nutrition and growth, 2, 163. France, rate of multiplication, 2, 482, 485. SUBJECT-INDEX. Frankland, Dr. E., on isomerism of pro- tein, 1, 483. Fries, E.: on indefiniteness of al¢@ and Sung, 2, 278; reticularia, 2, 430. Fuci: cell multiplication, 2, 19; pseudo- foliar and axial development, 2, 22; undifferentiated outer tissue, 2, 239. Function: biology and phenomena of, 1, 94—6, 98-100 ; co-ordinate structural modifications, i, 100-3; precedes structure, J, 153, 167 ; divisions of, 1, 154-6, 306; structurai complexity, 7, 156, 167; progressive structural diffe- rentiation, J, 157-60; differentiation and integration, 1, 160-4; speciali- zation and vicariousness, 1, 164-7; formula of evolution, 7, 168; dimi- nished ability and overwork, 1, 171; growth and increased, 7, 185-90, 190- 2; interdependence of social and organic, 7, 192-6, 197-9; structure and heredity, 7, 244-52, 255-6; aids natural selection, 7, 246; organic interdependence, 1, 255 ; parental con- dition and variation, 7, 261, 263; variation and altered, 7, 262-4, 269- 70; as causing variation, 7, 270-2; effect on physiological units, 7, 289, 291; zoological classification, 2, 305- 8; multiplication of effects, 1, 424; law of eyuilibration, 7, 432-5, 473; correlation of changes in, 1, 443; structural effects of changing, 1, 455- 7; structural co-operation, 2, 3, 200; vicarious vegetal, 2, 254; vicarious- ness and specialization, 2, 276; epi- dermic structure, 2, 295-9, 380; structure and muscular, 2, 3860, 384; structural repair and growth, 2, 361- 4; equilibration and adaptation, 2, 385 ; persistence of force and adapta tion, 2, 387. (See also Physiology). Fungi: nitrogenous character, 1, 38; multicentral development, 1, 135; axial development, 7, 136; unicellular, 2, 14; integration, 2, 17, 276; syme metry, 2, 122-5, 180; puffball tissue, 2, 228, 235, 379; tissue differentia« tion, 2, 239; inner tissue, ?, 262; in- definiteness, 2, 278; sexual genesis, 2, 429, 480; growth and genesis, 2 438; nutrition and genesis, 2, 464. Gallinacee (see Birds). Gamogenesis: homogenesis, 7, Z10; 7 SUBJECT heterogenesis, 7, 211, 273; offspring, development in, Z, 217; reproductive tissue structure, Z, 218-24; vegetal nutrition, 7, 224-8, 232; 2,30; animal nutrition, 27, 228-33, 286; when and why does it recur? 1, 233-7, 273-8 ; effect on species, 1, 251-6; leaf forma- tion, 2, 80; molluscan, 2, 103, 105; vertebrate, 2, 105; growth, 2, 249. (See also Multiplication). Gasteropoda (see Mollusca). Gemmation: and genesis, 1, 212-6; annulose, 2, 938-7, 98. Generation, and genesis: the words, 1, 209. Genesis (see Multiplication). Gentiana: floral arrangement, 2, 571-4. Genus: indefinite value, 7, 305, 361; in- stability of homogeneous and heteroge- neity of, 1, 421-3, 428, 429-31, 465, 473. Geology: growth displayed in, 7,107, 108; distribution in time, 1, 320-7, 328; special creation, 1, 335,340; evolution, 1, 347,352; record congruous with evo- lution, 7, 397-401, 472 ; organic influ- ence of changes, 1, 413-5, 464, 466, 473 ; climatic influence of changes, Z, 415; human evolution and changes, 2, 504. Germ cell: wunspecialized, 7, 219-24, 253; dissimilarity, Z, 265-7, 267-8, 269-70, 280 ; equilibrium, Z, 277. Gizzard, development of birds, 2, 312. Glass, molecular rcarrangement, Z, 274, 289, 487. Glove : structural analogy, 2, 285 ; strain analogy, 2, 544. Gcethe, J. W. von: foliar homology, 2, 34, 518, 514, archetypal hypothesis, 2, 109; vegetal fructification and nutrition, 2, 164; theory of supernu- merary bones, 2, 206; on the skuil, 2, 530. Gorilla, eallosities, 2, 295. Gould, J., Birds of Australia, 2, 448. Gout (see Disease). Graham, T.: properties of water, 7, 9; 2, 350; colloids and crystalloi:'s, 1, 15-8; their diffusibility, 2, 18-21; sapid and insipid substances, 7, 51. Gramine: foliar surfaces, 2, 57, 246; floral symmetry, 2,150; physiological ditferentiation, 2, 240. Gravity: effect on vascular system, 2, 298; vegetal circulation, 2, 555. Gregarina : central development, 1, 134; -INDEX, 985 primary aggregate, 2,78; symmetry, 2,169; asexual genesis, 2, 423. Growth : organic and inorganic, 7, 107- 9; simulation of, Z, 108; limits to, 1,109; structural complexity, Z, 110- 12, 117-9, 132; nutrition, 7,112, 119- 21,131; expenditure of force, 1, 113- 5, 131; initial and final bulks, J, 115-6, 127-31, 132; final arrest of, 1, 121-6; unceasing, 1,126; résumé, with generalizations, 7, 181; defined, 1,133; 2, 440; increased function, 1, 185-90, 190-2; functional imterde- pendence, 7, 192-6, 197-9; nutrition and vegetal, 7, 224-8, 252, 233-7, 273, 2, 30; heterogenesis and animal nue trition, Z, 225-31, 286, 273; homo- and hetero-genesis snd natural selec- tion, Z, 233-7; o acrogens, 2, 52; cylindrical form of vegetal, 2, 53-61 ; endogenonps, 2, 56-8, 75; exogenous, 2, 58-61, 75; plant differentiation, 2, 114-6; tissue differentiation, 2, 361-4; vegetal, and asexual genesis, 2, 419-22; animal, and asexual genesis, 2, 422-6; autngonistic to asexual genesis, 2, 426; veg tal and sexual genesis, 2, 28-31 ; animal and sexual genesis, 2, 431-6 ; antagonistic to sexual genesis, 2, 436-8; nutrition and genesis, résumé, 2,470-2; evolution, 2, 474-8; con mencement of genesis, 7, 479. Gunpowder, nitrogenous instability, 2, 8, 40. Gymnotus, electricity of 1, 48. Harrs: non-conductors of heat, 7, 440; vegetal, and natural selection, 1, 446 ; development, 2, 299-302; tactual organs, 2, 302. Hand: development of human, 7, 140; heredity and size of, 1, 248. Hare: activity and muscular colour, 2, 356-60; expenditure and genesis, 4, 451. Harley, Dr. T., on biliverdine, 2, 317. Head, structural influence of size, 2, 424, 451-8. Hearing, sense of, 7, 51. Heart (sce Vascular system). Heat: absorption by water vapour, 1, 7 ; action on binary compounds, 7, 8-9, 22; on ternary, Z, 10-12; on colloids and crystalloids, 1, 24; organic changes frum evaporation, Z, 27; 596 decomposition by, 7, 31; organic oxida- tion, 1, 43-6, 57 ; growth and organic, 1,124; animal, vegetal, and environ- ment, 1, 145-6, 149; alloy melting points, 2, 276; organic change and rhythm in terrestrial, 2, 411, 473; effect on physiological units, Z, 488 ; fish respiratory organs, 2,325 ; evolved by non-nitrogenous substances, 2, 353 ; animal preservation, 2, 414; verte- brate expenditure and genesis, 2, 447—- 8, 453; insect genesis, 2, 455. Hectocotylus, individuality, 1, 207. Hepatice: Schleiden on, 2, 47, 49; continuous and discontinuous develop- ment, 2, 49; vascular system, 2, 263; genesis and development, 2, 44.2. Heracleum: leaf symmetry, 2, 139-40; floral symmetry, 2, 156; axial and foliar organs, 2, 511-16. Heredity: structural modification, 7, 189 ; general truths, 7, 238-41; trans- mission of congenital peculiarities, 1, 241-4; atavism, or recurrence of an- cestral traits, Z, 243, 252; structure and altered function, 2, 244-52, 255- 6; physiological units, *ésumé, 1, 286- 91; natural selection, 7, 460-2, 469, 474; ethnology and natural selection, 1, 469; cell doctrine, 2, 12; physio- logical development, 2, 224, 229; wood formation, 2, 270; tissue diffe- rentiation, 2, 286, 295-9, 380; respira- tory system, 2, 293; osseous dilferen- tiation, 2, 342; muscular adaptation, 2, 359; persistence of force and phy- siological adaptation, 2, 387; vegetal vascular system, 2, 543, 551, 557, 565. Hermaphrodism, vegetal and animal, J, 278-9, 280. Heterogeneity: of vital change, 1, 63-71, 88, 90; of development, 7, 1388-41, 1590; functional, 7, 160-4, 168; of organic matter, 1, 286-91; organic, and in- stability of homogeneous, i, 421-3, 430, 465, 473; segregation of evolu- tion, 7, 426-8, 429-31, 4.55. Heterogenesis: classification, 1, 210-6, 273; animal nutrition, JZ, 228-33, 235-7; natural selection, 2, 233-7 ; heredity, 2, 238. Histolozy (see Physiology). Hollyhock, floral symmetry, 2, 152, 154. Homogeneous, insiability of the: vavri- ation, 7, 264-7, 267-8, 269-70, 230; _ evolution, 7, 421-3, 428, 465, 473; SUBJECT-INDEX. morphological development, 2, 7-98, 216; direction of vegetal growth, 2, 164; radial symmetry, 2,173; phy- siological differentiation, 2, 377, 38a. Homogenesis (see Gamogenesis). Homology, articulate integration, 2, 99= 102, 108, Hooker, Sir J. D.: European plants in New Zealand, 7, 389; vegetal diss tribution, Z, 391; amphibious and terrestrial plants, 1, 396; vegetal growth, 2, 53; balanophore, 2, 244; balanophore and rafflesiacee, 2, 257; structural complexity, 2, 278, 280; vegetal and animal distribution ard age, 2, 280; bean vascular system, 2, O45. Hooker, Sir W., on gungermaniiacea, 2, 49. Horns, natural selection and size, &, 451-3. Huxley, Prof. T. H.: “continuous” and “discontinuous”? development, 1, 185; life without organization, L, 154; pseud-ova, J, 214; classification of development, Z, 215; hermaphro- dism, Z, 281; zoological classification, 1, 301-3, 307; “On persistent types,” 1, 324-6; the cell-doctrine, 7, 18; Spongida, 2, 81; articulata, 2, 101; vertebrate embryo, 2, 106, 108; echino- dermata, 2, 179; molluscan sym- metry, 2, 185; ossification, 2, 207; celenterata, 2, 285; tegumentary organs, 2, 286, 297, 300; vertebrate sensory organs, 2, 304, 305; Kyber on aphis, 2, 455; Owen’s vertebrate theory, 2, 532. Hyacinth, symmetry, 2, 126, 147. Hydra (see Celenterata). Hydro-carbons: physical properties, 2, 6; chemical properties, 7, 8, 9; of living tissue, 7,10; tissue differentia- tion, 2, 363. Hydrogastrum: symmetry, sexual genesis, 2, 429. Hydrogen: chemical and physical pro: perties, 7, 3-5, 20, 22; binary com: pounds, 7, 6, 8, 9; ternary, Z, 10-12; quaternary, 7, 12-14, 23. Hydrozoa (see Caelenieraia). Hymenoptera (see Insects). Hypertrophy (see Disease). 2, izzy IpEAs (see Psychology}. SUBJECT-IN Individuality: the botanical, 7, 201-3 ; the zoological, 1, 203-4; the fertilized germ product, 2, 204-6; definition of life, 1, 206-8. Individuation : genesis, 2, 408-10, 472; total cost, 2, 415-7; genesis and evolution, 2, 474-8, Infusoria: functional specialization, Z, 306; primary aggregate, 2,79; lack- ing symmetry, 2, 170, 171; tissue differentiation, 2, 282, 378; genesis, 2, 423, 432. Injuries, repair of animal, 7,175 179- 82, 253. Insanity, and heredity, 7, 252. Insects: temperature, 1, 44, 146; phos- phorescence, 1, 46; self-mobility, 7, 147; homogenesis, 7, 211; partheno- genesis in lepidoptera, ie 214, 217, 233 ; growth and reproduction, 1, 2ak; vegetal and animal distribution, re 313; distribution in time, Z, 324. ; development, 7, 371, 373; segmenta- tion, 7, 880; aborted organs, 1, 386, 387; East Indian distribution, 7, 390; floral fertilization, 1, 438; 2, 183-5, 158, 250-8, 571; integration and homology, 2, 99-102, 108; bilateral symmetry, 2, 181; sexual selection, 2, 253; eyes, 2 303; environment, 2, 413; cost of genesis, 2, 416, 417; development aud penesis, 2, 441; nutrition and genesis, 2, 455, 466- 8. Instability of the homogeneous (see | Homog7necus). Integration: morphological composition, 2, 4-6; articuluta, 2, 99-102, 105; vegetal Bes colonial, 2, 275-8, 278-81, 383; genesis, 2, 404, 406-8. Tnternodes: Sricd development, 2, 3- 6; nutrition and length, 2, 162. Intestine (see Alunentary canal). Irish, nutrition and geuvesis, 2, 483. Tron: isomerism of compounds, 1, 4; colloidal form of peroxide, Z, 17, 20; molecular rearrangement, Ee 274, 289, 487 ; vegetal absorption, 2 , 042. Iron industr ; faberdapeddened of social function, 7, 194-6, 197-8. Isomerism: of organic constituents, 7, 4, 9, 23; ternary coiwpounds, 7, 11; quaternary, J, 13, 23; muscular action, Z, 56: organic evolution, 7, 483, 486; differentiation of nerve tissue, 2 346-51, 352; of muscular tiesue, 2, 351-5. Or oa) -I EX, JAUNDICE (see Disease). Jaws, of uncivilized and civilized, 7, 455. Jungermanniacee : morphology, 2, 24- 7; continuous and discontinuous de- velopment, 2, 49-52, 84; tubular structure, 2, 54,° 59; proliferous growth, 2, 63, 83; colour, 2, 71, 249; symmetry, 2,125; fertility and growth, 2, 421, Jussieu, A. de, vegetal classification, 7, 296. LABOUR, vlc sian — of, 1, 160, 168 ; 3 2, 365. Lamarck, J. B. P. A. de ae zoological classification, 7, 309; opinions of E. Darwin and, 7, 403, 405-9. Laminaria: pseudo-foliar and axial development, 2, 22; tissue, 2, 229, 239, 255. Language and evolution, 7, 360. Laurel, leaves of, 2, 1384, 281. Leaves : development and aggregation, 2, 28-33, 73; stem-like stalks, 2 32; homology, 2, 33-6, 71-4; foliar and axial development, 7, 36-46, 511-6; “aduate,” 2, 55; proliferous growth, 2, 63, 83; nutrition and develop- ment, 2, 738-4; symmetry, and of . branches, 2, 183-5, 135; size and distribution of leaflets, 2, 137-40; transition from compound to simpie, 2, 140-3 ; unsymmetrical form, 143- 4; morphological summary, , 216; tissue differentiation, 2, 229: distri- ou 2, 231; outer tissues of stem and, 2, 239-42, 253, 380; distribution of stomata, 2,243; wax deposit on, 2, 243-5 ; light and colour, 2, 245 superficial differentiation, 2, 246-8, 254, 380; root nourishment from, 2, 257 ; reas tissue differentiation, 261, 381; vascular tissue ditferentia: tion, 2, 269, 272, 381; dye abso: ption and circulation, 2, 58 30. -43, 546; vas- ‘cular system, 2, 507-61, 565; a1range- ment, 2, 571-4. Lepidoplera (see Insects). Lepidosiren: ossification, 2, 291; res- piration, 2,326; skeleton, 2, 522, 524, 529. Lepidosteus : der, 2, 322. 317, 357-8, Q ry armour, 1, 440; air blad: 588 Lessonia: Hooker on growth, 2, 53; branch symmetry, 2, 131. Lewes, G. H., definition of life, Z, 61. Lichens: cell multiplication, 2, 19; Hooker on growth, 2, 53; tubular structure, 2, 54; integration, 2, 276; indefiniteness, 2, 278; sexual genesis, 2, 430. Tiebig, Baron J. von, nitrogenous food stuffs, 1, 44, 45. life: co-ordination of actions, 7, 60,70; defined by Schelling, Z, 60, 150; Richeraud, 7, 60; De Blainville, 7, 60, 74; G. H. Lewes, 1, 61; the definite combination of heterogeneous changes, &e., 1,62-7; changes showing, 1, 72; defined by Comte, 1, 74; the definite combination, &c., in correspondence with external co-existences and se- quences, 1, 74, 263; correspondence of external and internal relations, 7, 74-7, 81; continuous adjustment of internal relations to external relations, 1, 80; completeness of, proportionate to correspondence, 1, 82-5; length and complexity, 2, 84; degree, and complexity of environment, Z, 85-8; perfect, is perfect correspondence, 1, 88, 92; definitions of evolution and life, Z, 89-93; definition of science of, 1, 94-6 ; is organization produced by? 1, 153; precedes organization, 1, 167; definitions of individuality and, 7, 207; effect of incident forces on, 1, 286, 231; length in individuals and species. 1, 338; equilibration of, 1, 462, 471; “absolute” commence- ment of, 7, 482, 485; integration and augmentation, 2, 406; prospective, 2, 494-7, L ght: influence on animals and plants, 1, 28-33; 2, 413; nitrogenous plants, Z, 38; animal and vegetal phos- phorescence, 1, 46, 57; heliotropism, 1, 73, 2, 145; effects on crguuic matter, Z, 121 ; plant adaptation, J, 184; organic change and rhythm in terrestriai, Z, 411, 473; vegetal in- fluences, 2, 115, 116, 132, 134, 139, 143 ; influence on flowers, 2, 152, 571- 4; vegetal tissue differentiation, 2, 236-8, 241, 242; action on leaves, 2, 243-8 ; on vegetal vascular system, 2, 271, 280,556; development of sensory organs, 2, 307. Lime, leaf forms, 2, 143, 144. He eee ea eee ee ee SUBJECT-INDEX. Lindley, J., vegetal classification, 2, 295-7. Linneus, C.: plant classification, 7, 295 ; animal, 7,298; indefiniteness of alae and fungi, 2, 278. Liver, the, development, Z, 375; 2, 316- 21. Liverworts, (see Hepatice). Logic, reasoning and definition of life ree Logwood, vegetal staining, 2, 538-45, 546-50, 593. Longevity, characteristic of develop: ment, J, 84. Lubbock, Sir J.: on Daphnia, 1, 229- 30; insecta and crustacea, 1, 231. Lungs (see Respiratory system). MAGENTA, vegetal staining by, 2, 538- 43, 546-50, 553. Magnetism, and muscular action, J, 56. Maillet, B. de, modifiability of organisms, 1, 402, 408. Mammalia: nutrition and growth, J, 113 ; growthand expenditure of force, 1, 114, 127; flesh constituents, J, 125; embryonic development and Von Baev’s formula, 1, 142-4; temperature, 1, 146, 149; self-mobility, 2. 147; functional and structural differentia- tion, 1, 157; viviparous homugenesis, 1, 211; classification, 1,308; cervical vertebra, 1, 309; 2, 533; aquatic, Z, 317; distribution in time, 7,324, 326; embryonic respiratory system, 1, 369; suppression of teeth, 1, 370; arrested development, 1, 385-6 ; symmetry, 2, 187 ; tegumentary structure, 2, 297, outer tissue differentiation, 2, 300; blood pressure, 2, 329, 330; ova matu- ratiozr, 2, 333; osseous differentiation, 2, 835-46; activity and muscula colour, 2, 356-60; functional integra: tion, 2, 367; growth and genesis, 2, 435, 438 ; development and genesis, 2, 444; heat expenditure and genesis, 2, 446-8 ; fertility of birds, 2, 449 ; mus- cular expenditure and genesis, 2, 451; nutrition and genesis, 2, 458. Manatee, nailless paddles, 7, 385. Marchantizcee: symmetry, 2,129; outet tissue difierentiation, 2, 238. Marmot, hybernation and waste, Z, 170, eB =. > SUBJECT-INDEX. 559) Marriage (see Multiplication). Masters, Dr. M. T., on foliar homology, 2, 33, 37-43. Materialism, and evolution, 7, 490-2. Mechanics: transverse strains, 2, 192-5 ; genesis of vertebrate axis, 2, 195-9, 199-201, 208; osseous differentiation, 2, 335-42; disintegrated motion, 2, 867; analogy from locomotive, 2, 490-2 ; future human evolution, 2,496; strain and vegetal structure, 2, 543- 57, 561-9. Meduside: contractile function, 1, 55, 2, 366; symmetry, 2, 171-4. Metagenesis: of Prof. Owen, 1, 213; in insects, 2, 446. Metals, melting 289. Meteorology: changing phenomena, 7, 63, 66, 88 ; crystallization of ‘storm glass,’ 1,77; special creation, 7, 335 ; rhythm in, and organic change, 7, 411-13, 473; effect of geologic change, 1, 415. Migrations: solar influences, 1, 412; causes, 2, 504. Milne-Kdwards, H.: “ physiological divi- sion of labour,” 1, 160 ; ocular struc- ture, 2, 303. Milk, expenditure and genesis, 2, 447. Mind (see Psychology). Mobility, molar and molecular, 7, 14. Mole, function and multiplication of effects, 2, 384. Molecules: mechanically considered, 1, 14; stability, 1, 274-8; nerve diff- erentiation, 2, 346-51, 372-5. Mollusca: axial development, J, 186, 137; vascular system, 7, 158, 161-2, 2, 3830-2; individuality, 7, 204 ; genesis, J, 211, ?, 425; hermaphro- aism, 1, 279; definition, 7, 307 ; dis- tribution in time, 7, 321, 324, 326; classification, 1, 363; development, 1, 372 ; amphibious and terrestrial, Z, 393 ; indirect equilibration, 7, 448; secondary aggregate, 2, 102-4; sym- metry, 2, 184-6; outer tissue, 2, 292, 280; alimentary system, 2, 312. Blolluscoida: ditferentiation, 1, 307; integration, 2, 85-7 ; a tertiary aggre- gate, 2,111; contrasted with mollusca, ?, 103; symmetry, 2, 176; vascular system, 2, 330-2; genesis, 2, 425; origin of vertebrate type, 2, 567. Monocotyledon (see Endogens), of alloys, 1, 276, Monstrosities, vertebrate, 2, 105. Morphology: as aiding biology, 1, 97 ; morphological units, 7, 182; rudimen- tary organs, 1, 384-7, 472 ; structural and functional co-operation, 2, 3 ; inte- gration, 2,4-6; change of shape, 2,6; formula of evolution, 2,7-9; evolution and cell doctrine, 2, 10-18. Morphology, animal: evolution and seg- mentation of articulata, 1, 380-2; vertebral column development, 7, 382- 4; primary aggregates, 2, 77-9, 111; secondary, 2, 79-83, 111; tertiary, 2, 83-5; integration in mulluscoida, 2, 85-7, 111; integration and indepen- dence of individuality, 2, 87-91, 111; segmentation in annulosa, 2, 91-3, 111; also integration, 2, 93-7, 99-12, 108, 111, 208; unintegrated molluscan form, 2, 102-4; adaptive segmentation in vertebrata, 2, 104-10, 111, 208; motion and symmetry, 2, 166-8; primary aggregate symmetry, 2, 169 ; secondary, 2, 170-4; symmetry of com- pound celenterata, 2, 174-6; simula- tion of plant shapes, 2,174; symmetry of molluscoida, 2, 176; of annuloida with echinodermata, 2, 177-80; of annulosa, 2, 180-3; of mollusca, 2, 184-6 ; of vertebrata, 2, 186-9,-190 ; similarity of animal and vegetal, 2, 189; cell shapes, 2, 210-12; evolu- tion and generalizations summarized, 2, 213-7. (See also Vertebrata). Morphology, vegetal : unice}lular piants, 2,14; aggregation and integration, 2, 15-8, 74-6: pseudo-foliar develop- ment, 2, 18-20; pseud-axial, 2, 20; pseudo-foliar and avxial, 2, 21-4: composition of jungermanniacee, 2, 24-7 ; leaf development and aggrega- tion, 2, 28-33, 71-4; foliar homologies, 2, 33-6, 71-4; foliar and axial de- velopment, 2, 36-46, 511-6; growth and development of acrogens, 2, 46- 53; of endogens and exogens, 2, 53- 61, 74-6; origin and development of axillary buds, 2, 61-5; growth of endogens and exogens, 2, 65-9 ; phenogamic axis and unit, 2, 69--71 ; development of foliar into axial organs, 2, 71-4; résumé, 2, 74-6; can plant shapes be formulated? 2,113; growth and differentiation, 2, 114-6; kinds of symmetry, 2, 116-8 ; symmetry of piimary aggregates, 2, 119-22; of 590 SUBJECT-INDEX. secondary, 2, 122-5; of tertiary, 2, 125-8; symmetry and environing influences, 2, 128-9; symmetry of primary branches, 2, 1380; of secon- dary, 2, 1380; of tertiary, 2, 131-3 ; leaf and branch symmetry, 2, 133-5, 136; phenogamic unit homology, 2, 136; size and distribution of leaflets, 2, 137-40 ; transition from compound to simple leaves, 2, 140-3; unsymme- trical leaf development, 2, 143-4 ; differentiation of homologous units, 2, 144; floral cluster symmetry, 2, 146, 158; radial floral symmetry, 2, 147-9, 158, 571; Bilateral floral symmetry and fertilization, 2, 149-55; floral clusters and component fiowers, 2, 155-8 ; cell differentiation and meta- morphosis, 2, 159-61; nutrition and | differentiation,2 , 162; and inflorescence, 2,163 ; helical growth of phenovams, 2, 164; summary of symmetry, 2 216; str ess and structure, 2, 258-62, 381; interdependence with physiology, 2, 221, (See also Leaves). Mosses: varied develonment, 2, 47, 49; indefiniteness, 2, 279; multiplication, 2, 421. Motion: organic and environment, 1, 145-50; of animals and waste, 1, 170, 176; conception of, 1, 491. Mountains: climatic effects, Z, 415; growth of trees on, 2, 127. Mouse: fertility, 2,401; expend’ture and genesis, 2, 452; tape- as develop- ment, 2, 466 ; mod rat, 2, 476-7. Mucous membrane, differentiation, 2, 307-9, 382. Mulder, G. J., on chlorophyll, 2, 244. Multiplication : declining fertility of evolution, 1, 84; 2, 411 ; biology and phenomena of, 7, 102; reasons for the word “ genesis,” 7,209; classifica- tion of processes, J, 210-6, 273; a process of disintegration, 7, 216-8; neprod uctige tissue in gamogenesis, 7, 218-24; nutrition and erowth, 7, 224. 33, 235-7; natural selection as aiding, 1, 233-7 ; hermaphrodism, animal and vegetal, 1, 278-9, 280; im-and-in breeding, 1, 282-4, 289 ; physiological units, résumé, 1, 286-91; four factors of law of, 2, 895, 415; destructive end preservative forces, 2, 397-9, 410; rhythm of species, 2, 399; fertility and preservation, 2, 400-3, 410; nutri- | tion and disintegration of, 2, 404, 405, 410; integration and genesis, 2, 406- 8; individuation, 2, 408-10, 415-7, 472, 474-8 ; difficulties from environ« ment, 2, 412; from individual expen- diture, 2, 413-5; plant growth and asexual genesis, 2, 419-22; and animal growth, 2, 422-6; character of asexual and sexual, 2, 428; vegeta} growth and sexual genesis, 2, 428-31; also animal, 2, 431-6; antagonism of growth and sexual genesis, 2, 4386-8; of development and genesis, 2, 440; vegetal development, 2, 441, 448; animal development, 2, 442, 444; vegetal expenditure, ?, 446; verte- brate expenditure, 2, 446-8, 451; muscular expenditure in birds and mammals, 2, 448-51; vegetal nutri- tion, 2, 454, 484; animal nutrition and agamogenesis, 2, 455; nutrition and effect of conditions, 2, 455-9; obesity and nutrition, 2, 459-62, 484; nutrition, résumé, 2, 468, 470-2; vegetal parasitic nutrition, 2, 463; and animal, 2, 464-6; insect nutrition, 2, 466-8; nutrition of blackbird and linnet, 2, 476; human, 2, 479-81, 493 ; nutrition and human, 2, 481-3; Doubleday on, 2, 483-5; human bodily and mental expenditure, 2, 484-7, 489-92, 502; civilized and uncivilized, 2, 487-9; human evyolu- tion and decline in, 2, 501-8; the future of population, 2, 504—7 ; equili- bration and evolution, 2, / 07. Muscle: electricity from, 1, 47; action of, 2, 56; growth and function, 7, 123; development, 7, 141; functional ditferentiation, 7,159; vicarious func- tion, Z, 166; waste and repair, 1, 171-3; modifiability and adaptability, 1, 185, 187,189, 191; natural selection and increase, 1, 450-8; differentia. tion. 2, 351-61; activity and pee 2, 856-60; repairand growth, 2, 361-4; integration, 2, 368, 375 ; equilibration in action, 2, 386 ; expenditure and bird genesis, 2, 448-51; power, as square of dimensions, 2, 449; future human evolution, 2, 495; origin of vertebrate type, 2, 567-9. Music, faculty of, and heredity, 7, 249, 260. Myocommata, and vertebrate skeleton, 2, 199, 201, 205. SUBJECT-INDEX, 591 Myriapoda: integration and homology, tion and waste, 1,171; adaptability, 2, 99-102; genesis, 2, 425. 1, 186, 189, 193: hereditary erilepsy, 1, 251; muscular differentiation, 2, 354. (See also peek Narrs, mammalian, 7, 385. Nervousness, and heredity, 7, 244, 251. Natural selection: structural modifica- | New Zealand, apron plants in, 2 tion, 7, 168; homogenesis and hetero- 389, 401. genesis, 7, 233-7; aided by function, Nitric acid, Pape ite 1; G;.8;. 9. Z, 246-52 ; special creation, 1, 340-4; | Nitrogen: chemical and physical proper- indirect equilibration, wh 444-9, AG 6, ties, 7, 3-5, 20, 22 ; binary compounds, 474; changes without, J, 44.9 57 3 1, 6, 8,9; instability of compounds, peanamiicnl tendency, ibs 450 ; general 1, 8, 37,39; 2, 232; quaternary com- docirine of evolution, 7, 457-62, 474; pounds, 7, 12-14, 23; organic impor- unceasing, 7, 468; ethnologic, 7, 48 ; tance, 1, 39-41 ; evolution of heat and vegetal nutrition, 2, 48; upright oxidation, 7, 44; tissue differentiation, vesetal growth, 2, 53; endogenous 2, 302-4; nutrition and genesis, 2, 461. growth, 2, 54; exogenous, 2, 61; | North American Review: “ Philosophical gemmation, 2, 90; navicula symme- Biology,” 1, 479-84; ** Physiological try, 2, 120; foliar position, 2, 143; units,’ 7, 484-94. foliar distribution, 2, 152; floral fer- | Notochord: formation, 2, 199-201, 569; tization and symmetry, 2, 153-5, segmentation, 2, 202-5. 571-4; helical phcenogamic growth, | Nutrition: organic re-arrangement, 1, 2, 164; echinodermata and bilateral 34; nitrogenous and non-nitrogenous, symmetry, 2, 179; vertebrate axis 1, 44, 45; 2, 353; food assimilation “segmentation, 2, 204; pkcenogamic and reasoning, Z, 62-8; needful for tissue differentiation, 2, 230; physio- vital change, 1,75; relation to growth, logical differentiation, 2, 235, 239; 7, 112, 114, 116, 119-21, 122, 127, 131; foliar wax deposit, ?, 244; foliar expeuditure of force, Z, 154, 306; surfaces, 2, 246; floral fertilization, flnid; 7; 165; vegetal erowth, it, 2, 252 ; sexual selection, 2, 253 ; inner 224-8, 232, 235-7; animal growth, J, vegetal tissue differentiation, 2, 262; 228-33, 235-7; Dr. E. Darwin on wood formation, 2, 270-1, 273-4; Se ee 1, 407; leaf development, aninal tissue differentiation, 2, 286- yon, oe 3 vegetal development, 2, 90; diiferentiation of respiratory sys- ie 162, ; axillary buds, 2, 61-5 ; tem, 2. 293-5; epidermic diflerentia- daicearee ms 70; vegetal inflorescence, tion, 2, 295-9; sensory organ deve- 2, 163; helical phcenogamic growth, lopment, 2, 307; skin and mucous 2,164; vegetal fructification, 2, 250 ; membrane differentiation, 2, 308; action of bile, 2, 317; osseous develop- localization of excretion, 2, 320-1; ment, 2, 340, 344; genesis, 2, 399, respiratory organs of fish, 2, 324-7; 402, 407, 415-7 432; of young, a paren- heart and vascular system, 2, 332, tal loss. 2, 404, 408, 409; distribution, 334; osseous diflerentiation, 2, 345; 2, 413; reproductive system, 2, 439; also muscular, 2, 354, 359-61; insect animal development and gene si8,, 2; nutrition and Boiess 2, 467 ; genesis 444; expenditure and genesis, 2, 447; and individuation, 2, 472; eeonamics of vegetal genesis, 2, 454, 484; agamo- evolution, 2, 474— 8; Darwin, 2 2, 900 ; genesis, 2, 455; genesis and -etiect of vegetal tissue formation, Z, pole 563- ae conditions, 2, 455-9; obesity and origin of vertebrate type, 2, 568. genesis, 2, 459-62, 484; general Wavicula, symmetry, 2, 120. doctrine of genesis, 2, 463; genesis Nenertide: aLeRTArOn, 2,94; bilateral and vegetal parasitism, 2, 463; also symmetry, ?, 178. animal, 2, 464-6; insect genesis, 2, Nerves: electricity from, 48 ; genera- 466-8 ; es résumé, 2, 470-2; tion of nerve-foree, 1, 49-53, 57; and evolution, 2, 474-8; of blackbird differentiation, 1, 159; 2, 346- 51, and bagel, 2,476; genesis in human ~ 352; vasculo- olor system, TAGZ race, 2, 481-3, 487-9; Doubleday on, rigarious function, 7, 166; over-exer- 2, 4838-5: future human evolution, no2 2, 498, 503 ; abnormal vegetal growth, 2, 512; organ of, (see Alimentary carpal). OBESITY, nutrition and genesis, 2, 459- 62, 484. Odours: floral fertilization, 2, 252, 258; animal protection, 2, 414. Offspring, influence of age on, 2, 480. Oken, L.: archetypal hypothesis, 2, 109; theory of supernumerary bones, 2, 206; on the skull, 2, 580. Opuntia (see Cactucee). Orchids: pollen propu'sion, 2, 54; leaf formation, 2, 56; aérial roots and physiological differentiation, 2, 2388, 240; foliar surface, 2, 247. Organic matter: properties of elements, 1, 3-5, 22; of binary compounds, 7, 5-10; of ternary, 1, 10-12; quaternary 1, 12-14, 23; molar and molecular mobility, 7,14; colloid and crystalloid form, 1, 15-8, 23; their diffusibility, 1, 18-21, 24; extreme complexity, 7, 21; modifiability, 7,265, 41; capillarity and osmosis, J, 26; effects of heat, 1, 27; of light, Z, 28-33; nitrogenous, 1, 35-41; oxidation and evolution of heat, 1, 43, 57; genesis of electricity, 1, 47-9, 57; transformations and persistence of force. 1, 57; sensible motions in, 7, 57; inorganic matter, 1, 89-93; résumé of generalizations, 1, 94; imstability, 7, 121, 420, 473; and heterogeneity, 1, 286-91; “spon- taneous generation,” and evolution of, 1, 479-84, 486; cell-doctrine and evolution of, 2, 10-13. Organization (see Structure). Osmosis: organic effects, 1, 26,27; in animals, 7, 55; 2, 361-4; in vascular system, 2, 298, 327-34; in vegetal tissue, 2, 537, 544, 546, 554, 561-4. Ossification (see Bone). Owen, Sir R.: metagenesis and partheno- genesis, 1, 213; fossil mammalia, 1, | 326; human parasites, 7, 342; con- tinuous operation of creative power, /, 404; theory of vertebrate skeleton, 2, 110, 517-35; theory of supernumerary bones, 2, 206; Eschricht on ascaris, 2, 465. Oxalis: radial symmetry, 2, 187; foliar surface, 2, 248. Oxen and sheep, growth of, 7, 128, 131. | SUBJECT-INDEX. Oxidation (see Oxygen). Oxygen: chemical and physical proper ties, 1, 3-5, 20,22; binary compounds, i, 5-7, 10, 22; ternary, 2 a0-ie¢ quaternary, 1, 12-14, 23; a crystal- loid, Z, 21; combining power and atomic weight, 1,31; organic change from, 1, 34; heat generation, 1, 43-6; phosphorescence, 7, 46; nerve torze dependent on, Z, 50; necessary to aniinal life, Z, 75-6; amount inhaled, 1, 170. Pacet, Str J., blood changes, from disease, 7, 177, 484. Palxontology: distribution in time, 1, 820-7, 328; special creation, 1, 340; record congruous with evolution, Z, 397-401, 472. Palimelia: tissues, 2,226; sexual genesis, 2, 429. Parasites: aberrant type forms, 7, 296; distribution, 7, 313; special creation and human, 7, 342, 354; retrograde development, 7, 370; nutrition and genesis in vegetal, 2, 463, 468; in animal, 2, 464-6, 468. Parthenogenesis: true and pseudo-, 1, 213-5; laws of multiplication, 2, 399; of articulata, 2, 426. Peloria: in gloxinia, 2, 151; pheeno- gams, 2, 163. Penguin, dermal structure, 2, 300. Persistence of force: properties of coms pounds, 7, 3; organic transformation, 1, 57; growth, 1, 122, 131, 132; organic energy, 7,176; erganic repair, 1, 177; variation, 1, 271; genesic, heredity, and variation, 7, 291; mou- phological summary, 2, 217; vegetal tissue differentiation, 2, 227; physio- lozical development, 2, 387. Petals: foliar homology, “adnate,” 2, 55. Petrels, Darwin on, 7, 368. Phanerogamia (see Phenogams). Phenogams: uni- and multi-axial sym metry, 2, 126-8; unit of composition, 2, 136; helical growth, 2,164; tissue and leaf differentiation, 2, 229-31, 379; also bark and cambium, 2, 231-8, 3793 also outer tissue, 2, 245, 239-42, 2538, 380; wax deposit on leaves, 2, 243-5 ; differentiation of inner tissues, 2, 256-8, 381; vascular system develops 2, 33-63 SUBJECT-INDEX. ment, 2, 263-8, 381; integration, 2, 277, 280, 383; multiplication, 2, 421, 422; genesis and growth, 2, 431, 437 ; and development, 2, 448; and nutri- tion, 2, 455, 456, 484. Philology, and evolution, 1, 347, 357-8, 360. Philosophy, (see Psychology). Phosphorescence, animal and vegetal, 1, 46. Phosphorus: allotropic, 7, 4; organic evolution, Z, 486. Photogenes, visibility of, 7, 174. Physalia: motion, 1, 55; individuality, 1, 204; tertiary aggregate, 2, S4. Physiological units: definition, Z, 183 ; genesis, 1, 220; heredity, 1, 253-6 ; variation, Z, 265-7, 267-8, 269-70; stability, 7, 277-8 ; hermaphrodism, 7, 278-9, 280; self-fertilization, 7, 279- 82, 290 ; interbreeding, 1, 282-4, 289 ; genesis, heredity, and variation, ré- sumé, 1, 286-91; organic development, 1, 373, 376-8; ‘mechanical theory,’ 1, 484-9 ; morphological development, 2,7-9; cell-doctrine, 2, 10-18; foliar development, 2, 72. Physiology: and psychology, 1, 98; comparative and general, 1, 100 ; vicarious function, 2, 165; primitive interpretations, 1,333; multiplication of effects, 1, 425; structural and functional co-operation, 2, 3; verte- brate organic symmetry, 2,190; and morphology, 2, 221-3 ; und evolution, 2, 223-5; tissue dilfierentiation and evolution, 2, 226-8, 377-83; tissue differentiation in secondary aggregates, 2, 228, 378; im phenogams, 2, 229- 31, 379; in bark and cambium, 2, 231-3, 379; on free and fixed surfaces, 2, 234-9, 253, 379; outer stem and leaf tissue, 2, 239-42, 253, 380; super- ficial differentiation in leaves, 2, 242- 8, 254, 380; floral tissue ditferentia- tion, 2, 248-53, 254, 381; outer plant tissue, résumé, 2, 253; inner plant tissue differentiation, 2, 256-8, 381; supporting plant tissue, 2, 258-62, 263-71, 381; vascuiar system develop- ment, 2, 262-8, 268-71, 381; inner plant tissue, summary, 2, 271-4, 381 ; vegetal integration, 2, 275-8, 278-81, 383 ; tissae differentiation in protozoa, 2, 282,378; analogy of tissue differen- tiation in celenterata, 2, 283-4, 382 ; 593 tissue reduplication in calenterata, 2, 284-6, 382; natural selection and animal tissue, 2, 285-90; outer tissue in celenterata, 2, 291; respiratory organs, 2, 292-5, 321-7, 380; diffe- rentiation of anima] epidermic tissue, 2, 295-9, 380; development of tegu- mentary organs, 2, 299-302, 380; of sensory, 2, 302-7; inner atd oute tissue transition, 2, 3U7-9, 382; ali mentary canal differentiation, 2, 310- 12; gizzard development in birds, 2, 3!2; alimentary canal of ruminants, 2, 314-6; differentiation of liver, 2, 316-21; of animal vascular system, 2, 327-34; of osseous system, 2, 334—- 46; of nerve tissue, 2, 346-51, 352; of muscle, ?, 351-61; tissue repair, and growth, 2, 361-4; correlation of integration and differentiation, 2, 365; differentiation and integration in animals, 2,365—-8; in vascular system, 2, 368-72, 375 ; im nerves, 2, 372-5; origin of development, 2, 377 ; animal differentiation and instability of homo- geneous, 2, 377-83, 385 ; summary of development, 2, 377--88; vegetal diffe- reutiation and instability of homo- geneous, 2, 377-83, 385; and multi- plication of effects, ?, 383-4, 385; animal differentiation and multiplica- tion of effects, 2, 383-4, 385; equili- bration, 2, 384-7; persistence of force and development, 2, 387; vegetal circulation and wood formation, 2, 533-66; also dye permeability, 2, 538-43, 546-50, 553, 555. (See also Function, and Multiplication). Pigeons (see Birds). Pike, unceasing growth, 2, 126, 231. Planaria : integration, 2, 94; symmetry, 2, 178; liver, 2, 316; unintegrated function, 2, 865; growth and genesis, 2, 432. Plants (see Botany, Morphology, and Physiology). Plato, idéa of, 2, 519. Plethora, nutrition and genesis, 2, 459- 62, 484. Pieuronectide: symmetry and eye, 2, 188; outer tissue, 2, 380. Plumatella: metagenesis, 1, 217; sym: metry, 2, 177. Polarity: organic, 7, 182, 253, 286-91; physiological units, 7, 484-92. Polymerism: of binary compounds, 7, 9, 594 23; ternary, 2, 11, 23; nerve tissue, 2, 847-51. Polype (see Celenterata). Polyzoa: structural indefiniteness, J, 145; functional differentiation, 1, 158 ; integration, 2, 85, 88; sym- metry, 2,177,189; functional co-ordi- nation, 2, 368; genesis, 2, 425. Potato: simulation of growth, 7, 108; physiological differentiation, 1, 238. Preservation: fertility and self-, 2, 403, 410; nutrition, 2, 469. Protein, isomerism, 1, 483, 486, 487. Protococcus (see Protophyta). Protophyfa: central development, J, 134; axial, 7, 135; structure, 1, 145; self-mobility, 2, 147; individuality, 1, 202; spontzneous fission, 1, 216; genesis, Z, 249, 2, 419, 442; hetero- genesis and nutrition, 7, 235; uni- cellular, 2, 14; symmetry, 2, 119; tissues, 2, 226, 231. Protozoa: locomotion, 1, 54, 147; cor- respondence shown by, 1, 75; struc- ture, 7, 111, 144, 145 ; development, 1, 134, 135, 372; spontaneous fission, 1, 216; genesis, 7, 219; 2, 422, 431; heterogenesis and nutrition, 1, 235 ; undifferent-ated, 7, 306; distribution, 1, 312; “spontaneous generation,”’ 1 480-4; primary aggregate, 2, 77-9, 111; progressing integration, 2, 79- 83, 111; symmetry, 2, 169; diteren- tiation, 2, 282, 291, 378; genesis in rotifera, 2, 432, 439. Pseud-axial development, vegeta!, 2, 20, 22. Pseudo-foliar d. velopment, vegetal, 2, 18-20, 22. Pseudo - parthenozenesis, animal and vegetal, 7, 214-6; 2, 466. Pseud-ova, of Huxley, 7, 214. Psychology : reasoning and definition of life, 1, 62-71 ; correspondence shown by recognition, 1,77; contrasted with physiology, 2, 98; subjective, and objective, Z, 99; comparative and general, Z, 100; vicarious function, 1,166; waste and repair in sensory organs, 1, 173-4; sensory adaptability, Z, 186, 188, 189; sensory organs and heredity, 1,244; heredity and musical talent, 7, 249; primitive ideas and progress of knowledge, Z, 333; in- concaivability of special creation, .J, 336, 344, 348, 470; conceivability ot | SUBJECT*INDEX, evolution hypothesis, Z, 348-51, 355, 470; persistent formative power, ua- representable, 7, 404; E. Darwin and Lamarck on desires, 1, 406; natural selection and brain evolution, Z, 469; “ mechanical theory” and the unknow- able, 7, 490-2 ; vitiation of evidence, 2, 80 ; repetition and perception, 2, 128; sensation and vascular system, 2, 299 ; differentiation of sensory organs, 2 302-7; differentiation of nerve tissue. 2, 346-51, 352 ; functional integration, 2, 368; also integration, 2, 372-5; equilibration of nerve discharge, 2, 386 ; genesis and nerve development, 2, 445, 502; mental activity and genesis, 2, 485-7, 489-92, 502.; future human evolution, 2, 495-7, 499; human evolution and genesis, 2, 501- 3; future mental development, 2, 506; origin of vertebrate type, 2, 567-9. Pieropoda: bilateral symmetry, 2, 184; outer tissue, 2, 292. Pyrosoma: phosphorescence, Z, 47 ; in- tegration, 2, 89. QUATERNARY compounds, propevties, 7, 12-14, 23. Quills, development, 2, 299-302. RaBBit: activity and muscle colour, 2, 356-6) ; expenditure and genesis, 2,451. Radial, definition, 2, 133. Raffiesiacee: tissue differentiation, 2, 235, 257; nutrition and genesis, 2, 463. Rathke, H., on vertebrate embryo, 2, 106. Ray, J., plant classification, Z, 296. Reasoning, compare with assimilatien, 1, 62-8. Remak, R., on vertebrate embryo, 2. 108. Repair: continuity of, 1, 171-4; of animal injuries, 1, 175, 173-82; organic, and assimilative power in bicod, 177-9 ; of differentiated tissue, 2, 361-4. Reproduction (see Multiplication). Reptilia: growth and expenditure of force, 1, 114, 127; sizes of ova and adult, 7, 116; temperature, 7, 146; SUBJECT-INDEX. waste, 1,170; distribution in time, 7, $25, 328; bilateral symmetry, 2, 186, 187; outer tissue differentiation, 2, 301, 380; activity and muscular colour, 2, 356; functional integration, 2, 367; hind limbs, 2, 382; vertebral column, 2, 385; Owen on skeleton, 2, 529; vertebre, 2, 533. Respiratory system: effect of light, 7, 28; organic rearrangement, 1, 34; cutaneous, 7, 165; differentiation, 2, 292-5, 321-7, 380; osmosis and deve- lopment, 2, 362; physiological inte- gration, 2, 366-7, 375; vascuiar dif- ferentiation and integration, 2, 369. Rhizopoda: structure, 7, 145; life with- out organization, Z, 1038, 156; un- differentiated, 1, 3806; a primary ageregate, 2, 77; symmetry, 2, 169; tissue differentiated, 2, 282, 378; motion of sareode, 2, 346. Rhythm: astronomic and organic, 1, 411-8, 473; law of equilibration, 2, 432-5; of multiplication, 2, 399. Richeraud, Baron A., definition of life, 1, 60. Rivinus, A. Q., plant classification, J, 295. Roots: physiological differentiation, 2, 286-8, 253 ; nutrition from leaves, 2, 257; size and function, 2, 259. Ruminarts, alimentary canal cevelop- ment, 2, 314-6. _ Salmonide, reproduction and growth, JZ, 231. Salpide : heterogenesis, 1, 212, 217 ; in- tegration, 2, SY. Sap (see Vascular system). Sarcina: central aggregation, 2, 16; fertility, 2, 420. Scent: foral fertilization, 2, 252, 253 ; animal protection, 2, 414. Schelling, E. W. J. von, definition of life, 7, 60, 150. Sehleiden, J. M.: on individuality, 2, 202; hepatice, 2, 47, 49; algal inde- finiteness, 2, 279. Sea: organic motion, 2, 65; life in, lower than terrestrial, 2, 85; distri- bution, Z, 312, 429; change of media caused by, 1, 393; geologic influence, 1, 414. Bea's : nvil-bearing, 1, 385; vibrisse, 8, 302, | 70 595 Sedgewick, Wm., on heredity, 1, 248, 252. Seeds : nitrogenous, 7, 38 ; temperature of germinating, 1, 44; natural selec- tion of, 1, 447. Segmentation: in annulosa, 2, 91-3, 111; simulated in mollusca, 2, 104, 111; in vertebrata, 2, 104510, 111, 202-5, 208. Segregation: of growth, Z, 108; of like units, Z, 151; organic repair, 7, 177; variation, 1, 264-7, 267-8, 269-70; morphologic development, 2, 7-9; heterogeneity, and definiteness of evo- lution, 2, 426-8, 429-31. Self-fertilization, animal and vegetal, Z, 279-82, 290. Senses, the (see Psychology). Sexual selection (see Natural selection). Sheep: and oxen, growth of, 1, 128; nutrition and genesis, 2, 459. Ship-building, interdependence of social functions, 7, 194-6, 197-8. Silica, colloid and crystailoid, 7, 17. Silicic acid: properties, Z, 16, 17; iso- merism, 1, 56. Silicon, allotropic, 1, 4. Skeleton, vertebrate (see Vertcbruta). Skin: adaptability, Z, 185; 2, 293-9, 380; differentiation, 2, 198, 200, 286-90; tezumentary development, 2, 299-302, 350; differentiation of sen- sory organs, 2, 302-7; and mucous membrane, 2, 307-9, 382. j Skull (see Vertebrata). Sleep, repair favoured by, 1, 172. Smali-pox, blood changes from, 1, 177. Smith, Prof. W., on fertility of diato- macee, 2, 420. Snakes (see Reptilia). Sociology : functional differentiation, 2, 160; division of labour, Z, 162; fune- tional interdependence, 1, 193-6, 197-9; evolution 7, 347; organic de- velopment, 7, 373, 376; natural selce- tion, 7,469; integration and differen- tiation, 2, 371; effects of population, 2, 506 ; equilibration, 2, 507. Solanum: organs of attachment, 2, 260 ; inner tissue, 2, 202. Special creation: and evolution, Z, 331, 344; improbable, 2, 334-6, 344, 354, 470; inconceivability, 1, 336, 344, 348, 470; of individuals and species, 1, 337-40; implication of benevolence, 1, 340-4, 854; suinmary, 1, 344, 470; Von Baer’s formuia, 7, 596 365-9; vertebrate skeleton, 2, 520, 525, 534. - Species: adaptation and stability, J, 199; change in, Z, 209; hereditary transmission, 7, 258-41; variation in wild and cultivated, 7, 250-2, 262-4; gamogenesis, 1, 284-6; indefinite value, 1, 305, 361; special creation, Z, 337-40; instability of homogeneous and heterogeneity of, 7, 421-3, 428, 429-31, 465, 473 ; persistence of, 1, 428, 430; natural selection and equi- libration, 7, 457-62, 469, 474. Specific gravity, of organisms and en- vironment, /, 145, 149. Sperm cell: unspecialized form, 7, 219- 24, 253; dissunilarity of, 1, 265-7, 267-8, 269-7v, 280; equilibrium, 7, 277. Sphere: tendency of units to form, 7, 15; the embryonic form, i, 149; symmetry, 2, 116. Spheroid, symmetry, 2, 117. Spine (see Vertebrata). Sponge: multicentral development, 1, 135; reproductive tissue, J, morphological integration, 2, 81-3, 111; physiological differentiation, 2, 283. 379; physiologically unintegrated, 2, 375; development and genesis, 2, 442; analogy from, 2, 545. Spontaneous generation: and _ hetero- genesis, 7, 210; and evolution, 7, 47Jy- 84, 485. Stamens, and foliar homology, 2, 33-6. Starches: properties, Z, 10-12; saccha- rine transformation, J, 36, 37; 2, 552. Steenstrup, J. J. S., on eye of gleuro- nectide, 2, 188. Stickleback: ova, 2,433; bothriocephalus in, 2, 466. Stomach (see Alimentary canal), Stomata, distribution, 2, 243. Straight line, and evolution hypothesis, 1, 348. Strain: compression and tension of, 2, 192-5; vegetal structure, 2, 543-87, 561-5; origin of vertebrate type, 2, 569. Strawberry : multiaxial development, Z, 137 ; multiplication, 2, 421. Structure: biology and organic, 7, 94-6, 96-8 ; functional co-ordinate modifi- cation, 7, 100-3; size and organic, /, 110-12; growih and complexity oi, Z, 117-9, 182; relation to environment, Z, 145-50; precedes function, 1, 153, L223 Tznta (see Entozon). l SUBJECT-INDEX. 167 ; functional complexity, £, 156, 167; also diff+rentiation, Z, 157-60 ; reparative power, 1, 175; social end organic functional interdependence, 1, 192-6, 197-9; reproductive tissue, 1, 219-22; heredity and function, 1, 244-52, 205-6; varied by function, 1, 270-2, 455-7, 2, 200; zoologica} classification, Z, 305-8; equilibration, 1, 432-5, 474; co-operation witb function, 2, 8; evolution’ and in: creased, 2, 4; earliest organic forms, 2, 12; cylindrical vegetal, 2, 54-8; permanence and complexity, 2, 278, 280; function and epidermic, ?, 295- 9, 389; and muscular, 2, 360, 3843 and repair and growth, 2, 361-43; adaptation and equilibration, 7, 385 ; persistence of force and physio‘ogical adaptation, 2, 387 ; evolution, 2, 474-_ 8. (See also Morphology). Struthers, Dr. J.: on heredity, 7, 243, 252; digital variation, 7, 208-60. Sugars: properties, 7, 10-12; vegetal trausformation, 7, 36, 37; 2, 5€2. Sulphur: allotropic, 2, 4, 56; organic evolution, 7, 486. Sun (see Light). Survival of the fittest (see Natural se- lection). Symmetry (see Morpholegy). Taste, depencent on chemical action, J, ol. Teeth: hereditary transmission, 7, 244; suppression of mammalian, 1, 3/0; of uncivilized and civilized, 7, 455. Temperature (see Heat). ‘Tension (see Strain). Thallassicolle: unicentral development 1,134; secondary asgregate, 2, 80-3, 111; symmetry, 2, 170. Tide (see Sea). Tissue (see Physiology). Tortoise: life of dog and, 1, 84, &5 natural selection and carapace, 1, 448, Tree (see Botany). Tremblay, A., on the polype, 7, 180. Trichiniasis, in Germany, 1, 343. Tubicole: development, 2, 92; bilateral symmetry, 2, 180. Turnip: outer tissue, 2, 287; vascular system, 2, 264, 268, 547, 560, 569. | Twins, similarity of, 1, 261, 264, SUBJECT-INDEX. Tyndall, Prof. J., on heat absorption by water vapour, J, 7. “Types, persistent,’ Huxley on, 2, cut 6. Urcrr, dermal structure, 2, 289. Ulva: cell multiplication, 2 185 tissue, 2, 239. Unbellifera : floral symmetry, 2, 156 ; axial and foliar organs, 2, 511-6. Units: differentiation and dissimilarity, 1, 21; segregation and organic repair, 1, 177-9, 179-82 ; chemical, morpho- logical, and physiological, Z, 182-3; stability, 7, 275; instability and hete- rogeneity of eee, J, 287; morpho- logical composition, 2, 5. 7-9, 18, 75, oa7 ; phenogamic, 2, 69-71, 136; annulose, 2, 97; incident force and homologous, 4 144; morphological summary, 2,2 15. Physiological, (see Physiological units). Unknowable, the, manifestations of, 1, 491, Uns; mmetrical, definition, 2,116. outer Van BENEDEN, P. J., on tenia, 2, 95 Variation: Struthers on digital, 7, 25 5 60; effects of parenta! conditio:, Z, 260-2; of altered funetion, 7, 262-4 270-2; “spontaneous,” 1, 261, 272, 425, 480; 2, 500; dissimilarity of initial conditions, 1, 264-7, 267-8, 269- 70; persistence of force, 7, 271; phiv- siological units, résumé, 1, 286-91; equilibration and vegetal, 1, 437-9; equilibration of favourable, 2, 387. Vascular system: nutrition, J, 118, 120; development, Z, 140; function, ZI, 184-6: of mollusca, 1, 158; func- tional differentiation and intesratio n, 1, 161-3 ; organic repair, 1, 173, 177- 0; adaptability Obl, 186 ; and in- creased function, 7 191, 193 ; heart cievelopment, 7, 375, 377; equilibra- tion, 7, 450; development of vegetal, 2, 256-8, 262-8, 268- ee 381; diffe- rentiation of, summary, 2, 271 A: dsl; effect of gravity, 2, 298; differ ‘enti: tion of animal, 2, 327-34; "mammalian biood pressure, 2, 329; ‘Usseous deve- lopment, 2, 338- 42 ; muscularity, 2 2, 39d ; muscular colour, 2, 357-60; repair and growth, 2, 361-4; heari- O94 motor apparatus, 2, 366; differentia- tion and integration in animal, 2 7, 368- 72, 375: wood formation, 2, 536- —61; vésumé of wood formation, 2, 561-6. Vegetal (see Botany and Morpliology). Velocity, of moving bodies, 2, 2U2-4. Vertebrata: size, 1,11i3 size at birtl. and maturity, Z, 116; axial structure 1, 186; embryonic development and Von Baer’s furmula, 1, 142-4; self- mobility, Z, 147; functional differen- tiation, 7, 160; reparative power, Z, 175, 179; homogenesis universal, 1, 210 ; Huxley's “defini fon. 2,307); Gcatetpnt of hie gher, 7, 308 ; distri- bution in time, one 525 ; classificatoiy value, 7, 861; embryonic mammalian respiratory system, 1, 869; direct and indirect development, 1, 372, 375; evolution and vertebral column, Z, 852; rudimentary organs, 7, 385; evo- lution and varied media, 1, 391-7 ; size of head and vertebra, 7, 424; segre2ation and evolution of vertebre, 5 Pe aT adapt tive seginentation, 2, 104-10, 111, 208: bilateral symmetry, 186-9; internal organic symmetry, 2, 191; genesis of rudimentary axis, 2, 193- 9; origin of notochord, 2, 193- 2U1; spinal segmentation, 2, 202-5, 208; shull development, 2, 205; membranous, cartilaginous, and osseous a skeleton, 2, ae résumé, of axis development, 2, 208; be ea organs, 2. 304; air meine 2 2, 322; osseous difierentiation, 2, 334-46; activity snd muscular colour, 2, 356-60; he of art-motor apparitus, 2, 366; cost SES 2, 416; agamogenesis unknown, 2, 426; growth an genesis, 2 433 ; ae expenditure and genesis, 2, 446— 8, 453; Owen, theory of skele- ton, 2, 517- 35: e\ olution of vei ‘tebre, 2, 5382-5; origin of type, 2, 567-9. Viviparous: homogenesis, Z, 210, 218; heterogenesis, 1, 214-5. Volcano, definition of life, 7, 67, 70. Volvocine : individuality, 1, 202; disin- tegration of genesis, 1, 216; spherical ageregation, 2,16; symmetry, 2, 122; outer tessue, 2, 234, 379 ; fertility, 2, 421. Vomiting, 2, 315. Vorticella: secondary aggregate, 2, 82: symmetry, 2, 171. alimentary canal developwent, 598 SUBJECT-INDEX. Wattacz, A. R., “The Origin of the | Weight: relation to environment of Human Races,” 1, 469. organic, 7, 145, 149; varying as cube Waste: vegetal, 7, 169, 176; animal, of dimensions, 2, 414, 449. 1, 169-71, 185; relation to activity, 7, | Wind: and vegetal bilateral symmetry 175-7. 2, 127; and inner vegetal tissue Water: properties, 2, 7, 9; colloidal differentiation, 2, 258-62, 269, 272 affinity for, 1, 26; organic change 381; and vegetal multiplication, 2 from, 1, 27; organic need for, 1, 119, 278; and vegetal sap movement, 2 121; in mammalian flesh, 7, 125; 552, 553, 556, résumé, 561-5. in organic matter, 1, 149, 149; terres- | Wolff, C.: vegetal fructification ante trial organisms inhabiting, 1, 316; nutrition, 1, 224, 2, 163-4; vegeta change of media by animals, 1, 391-7; vascular system, 2, 266. vegetal tissue differentiation, 2, 236; | Women (see Multiplication). molecular rearrangement, 2, 330; | Wood (see Botany). colloidal contraction, 2, 352. Watts, Dr., on The Principles of Biology, he ee Yeast: fermentation, 7, 35, 27; lines Wax, folier deposit, 2, 243-5, aggregation, 2,16; fertility, 2, 420, wae o al . ¢ y - y a ‘ ‘ ~ é “ ? Ps - es i i — S o ahi y eA” gh i -~ > = , , Ci 7 _—, d - § = a + 7 = = a 7 7 “3 7 , : i = a : - 4 f t F ' - _ | a i] : - * e as = o 7 <4 : ob oy