ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCEITY OF ONTARIO. PROCEEDINGS 18TH - 21ST ANNUAL REPORT mir atten 1887 - 1889 7 = am Be, woe, : pin.» Handle with EXTREME CARE This volume is BRITTLE and cannot be repaired Photocopy only if necessa GERSTEIN SCIENCE INFORMATION CENTRE Please, retie with the linen tape Sa re ge. io ih. Fs Oye NEE Gay OQ \ v x ‘ 1 me eR ae Oh - * ieee we. eae i ABE %y ap 4 y hy eit bas "GS . we : a opin ee pose Ie e racee Se. a. pe a” 5 , % >e — fells, a aie sabebad*. wt es i ye ee 5 Presented to the Faculty of Forestr . , . FACULTY OF FORESTRY LIBRARY ssw UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO age y ‘ a 4 tig <9 a - P . Me a p } te - - } 4 . > 44% » ) « ~ - . t . » ° - * al e 7 _ = . ns . ) 7 j - ‘ } . n P . , ‘ - ad a a Th in 6 . : ie eo oe j : Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2009 with funding from University of Toronto http://www.archive.org/details/proceedings18ento ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO PROCEEDINGS 1887 - 1889 Note issues in this volume are bound out of order. Sequence: 19" ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FRUIT GROWERS’ ASSOCITION 18'4 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO 20" ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FRUIT GROWERS’ ASSOCITION 19™ ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO 2187 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FRUIT GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION 20'* ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO tyra JAGSOIONey 2 | RAS [oe —_ \e ARO See Tare) ee a 1. cig 7 ees 5 Brockville Beauty Apple........ ROE ee Sel. ct de 91 meetewme a: the Association... .. +... 1.2. uve eee eee ee se epitele Sa cule sees. 177 eres CRY POEANE 3053) ) 5 eo w Sel = Pg. As we. es os an - «oO LOUD ws 175 Canada at the Colonial Exhibition....................... Perry Co ee ae 48 Canker Worm, Remedy for....... SO EE A A ES Ee EER ec rk! Oe 66 IN shh ac ras a aa ig aN sea tice @ GEM docu, s oo a so aohilgge a 'o SoG SEN She .67, 68 — lV. PaGE. | JTL IS To. os SR ee eg | OL ae Pen coe 19 2 TUNE L b Mae ey eo oe ec iie a ree eee ee ees 126 een RIN SSEITEG EOE 2S a Hs SC ees Sok Dm ose is nse Sn SA RS EAS 65, 67 1 nt ee et ee Coe ee Se Oe ee 7 Peeeniae tal aidtan Wexhiibition 9, 2. A. Vk ie at. oe. fee lest tne dene nen 4, 52, 168, 175 (LUTE Lp Te oe Se eR ope a ro ae ae 43 ~) SUED LET Sa ee cee ee ee Be has: Soon eee a 58 RINE TERE 30 2 P< EA RR are aCe hams a hy ead oo! = / 80 RE RRIMEMEETAE NLS PEPTIC S22 2 a uae is ha SER oe a ak ee Pe ees 4 1 Re 176 pueesaenentmypie Market... o.oo). oe Gen de. sonseic mans ue sit Ck 51 ENN TNEMEIRA 080 Bis saad os 8d wa'ciclos BOE ss oS vd ckty ite p oe a Paes MOR, ke 50 nmmameNY OL ENG CCN 2 os how's wo ee oem A paiateiaets-edaccees Cio 102 NE Ree M EERO oo 2) a. Sod can a Sige be Sarak Mes A A TC Re POETS Sa 58, 60 SNES APU REISE LRPAOND 223.4 oes oa ay ic J han he gees cece emi ees hy BT Oe 15 EM A ES 255k 8 ied Wis S Sa oe ee aos « Bed aps eet ee nS sale w Br a re 10 Me aS ok A Aes Cio mc acu accents oo Ao ne 6 eee Seine, REE a 22 (oo UL rr Se eNea rk ve eee MT mea ls 41 PURE LD es ene ee eee eee ey AR Ry eS - 87 Election of Officers for 1887-88............. wavy «om Shee yw otha af ee a eae gm ame vc, egret ee 138 Steer EEARADIANIING OF oo <<) oe ec eee hs ooh whe oe hmm eee sao) aiiaee shbch Hie 115 NNR os Fs, 8 AED os aah Bidens & eu caTIe 7 © GE ae erates Saeabey Ss Sar i Se eg 44 | UUM DD DE 0 sn ene ni eee CRM eT Rene enon ES ee ee \ 138 NM SMEAR PURI 8 6 ihe ns ll, a Lic phe AM Bs ok Mme ean) ae it eee ee es 48, 76 RR METER IES OTL S850 5 52-50 os SG chvig dives sb. Re leisy eed oe ES RI ate aur et 62 etree ee Gti COTONOIG os Si dcc yw ad dines nica oa ab a vEG se matelenee St Once 104 Fertilizers, Commercial ....... a) chiar Sie oi tahoe cc Reeateve als a SRLS IA in REG ie ey 80 Freestone Peach, Early........... “sais iS diobatoMGeee Re 1 esa a sai Se MNS seks 2 See 41 PMEMELEDIAGES OF TOM) fo 5).,< oo arcs iw tne: hoe sae sd he oe woh xa 0s so 9 3 CO 157 Re MERTECMAROE TOMO TOS 25 a5 oie. 2 4 ftsje le ais wid ancwistn Donon es aT tech = cs vee hee 12 METCRINNR ERS SOMIEL GE carci Sch sion 5. rise Se dad Das ea Sd we ED 86, 123, 171 ete eeremertin in Wea Ooutity. . 5.0 U. ss 2éc sane de) «cm sean ces 4 eae eds a lve eae 37 ME ROMEO MINOT, WIUAL AGIOS, c0 csc os oa ¢4 vue ance) Me ‘Sew g hea uh avs paved de eee 41 TERME EAL ec Unc a ai hae Deady s wosele St ee eae. Be ASO BOs +. see 154 UT NT a a er ae eC i 113 a ee LE Oe ee ee De A ae Ae 15, 17, 18, 20 Peeps Crowd, rast, Present and Future of .........-.<.secewceens:. s+... 0n one 71 ED MERUIIETIA WN ARE NERY 5 35 oso i.g6 0k 6 dd dk Gav's ava hoe d ORE + a+ «sagen 72, 165 Sees itom High Aliimdes in Ontario: .. i. cea. conus eevee eeu eee 5 yo e0 snide 158 SEMSEEEEIFS GIG MMMTIGIAGUNG . 6 ai, 5ix'sixs wien sd v's nvm cob Agee Fes UNA kegs ye olen 162 Grape Preserving for Winter ....... Re SSR re ee Ne RPT LAE oho, 165, 166 EIS OLMMG ere 5 0 Ginn. S widisvvis. din a’ v9 sale wis Ska aeliae eppleki ce aaa 7, 167, 168 CERNING Joao e's!. «sx s'lipe> viv os. wes ca sisiv's dey as. 6-0 5 a8 ph Sulnigeeel pa Sip uEEONMECREOMS ORI, 5 so % | mks WRW'S 0.05'F dav wb cdo em 0 won cha eee nee 74, 75, 163, 164 ne ee OG CMEIMEWOORS 05 oo iiss «ods ce achavbne. ig clei Oy sk wha toe eee 10, 117 Vv. Pace. ne PMN Soo balers ci si cad Mand Webs Rae one eee Sas Ske Soha 98 eee MN gE 5 Sock wc Vie ig Sy ya aw oa digs Wels We atnmsiers sedge asNae es 111 Se a EK oa! a aS cin nO oi e'o vin ala Sh alew a's grad aetna wale ele a WSSU oie Her 20 Ee: Cane Nes 0. esas wk & sie slgvigd es she aeles made UUbidad eel. nbd ee 15 SMU Diy n'a oir is s'a)=' 3's 4 old a's nd ee oaisisre divided marae wn em Mbotend Sa wie gweld 130 EAE Buns di 5 ata Sia eo oho bBo Aus ane ah ge Mee = FY k WN wigs Re vee ST 20 RMOMMORG PMCKING. 00... 8 ee ee ee ee een cece rete nen reese tesneneceaes 5 ee OES fe Des ide ai nin: clea ewe kd tp abe rr cewknwnadensberes 4 LEON MUENEUEN EEE APRUG MOG... 5... 22 3 occ nec cas he tate bnccama vba ap aleew ders 64 eR Ay bs she's cies fb on Sik~ pap nent dal bes cana = non PEMD E Ree 22 EE a Be gh x i ni wls s «vo ois Se wows woe ea aks uelee 3% Oeste 44 Pre On eee rom United BiAbed. . 2... oe eee) dee weneacee ce duet sapicmme 154 el Rees wis yu Sieie.n 6 g's's ees sie dd OE sae oop ee alas Cae eee See 163 I ira eee ak Boel done swig V5 G's «Seam vind ote a up ee odes pes op oe 10, 69 LEE MO PCESE SMOG 25 oa 5 oan ct spa eieicamies as nclsiese sie ewes + oa ROEE 33 RINNE ERIN 5 Sy on oy aoc as Ga oie ais oo ches «esse RoE ASS fen nie MEME YY 5 oo oe dP iaielefbtc Es fee's v tiene we bidiv'es Vass Ob sone o VES ETH E 24 ee eee een ere reer ee ee D {eft san MN C2 SOS i's 4 olin. vob Tienes ke aes )° Subtade, ee aeeR eee One oa lee 128 ENE SROCOTAAOIS . 5. Gis os wk eco. een eee www semicdee weep le Yao tials spb aris 130 Re ee i er ere. oe eer. ec 134 ewe Ee anerby J..A: Morton iia. 2 rs is. see wee ots oe oenue MAY Jos seen 135 ED Sa Se ee a Rm ee ae ee foe 115 NOE oe nt ares 2 x vn Raw che eee ano emss loses ee sewers has oe ME eee 25 yon, T. T., Address at Chatham by... ......- 2-0... ce ese n eee reece tere een een ee sbens 22 EE ERACDRNNEE Sco... ois ain alle vir Row, o okae olor eae = piste 4 & vel mabe wee ated -o 21 I EMERIEESS SABIE Sancho od Ba eo wren SS eR ER Bima ways Geko Oss be lage aes See 6, 9 SR SEPEIIICH. SOEUR 6 oie con 5 so Tp es wis abt elne os os ampyeEee -tae eco Ree. 111, 147 IEEE EIEN, ASHOTICAIE 0... 50 2 fone oa nn wn wo Sn oo osm gale Se oe ++ ie blad ams or Os 148 UT SRMMUNE Ste AMIR ED PB 3 2) Jie os 2 Bias oS ‘an eee ale, ~ <0 20. a AE ee ee 51, 149 Markets for Apples, Copenhagen, Covent Garden.................. 022 e cree eects 51 mmntreewire ir DICEDIIPONOd 9 o. c= - S s See l e ee ee ee mete en emebane Seals 85 Ser Petaling for SRIpping.. ..T. .- -. os eae ee reece nee oeieieinie tame 111 II MEMINCSO 20s Seer M8 P ean Wines we ee ge te eprtis ari’ = FOR Sates 65 ERENCE fo Sc ket emacs ote aa 5 sso «3 5 hee a ore, ee ee eee 19 Moore’s Ruby Currant........... ie en nthe ea te cen Baan = ~ 2 bac mi cwicya Siete EY 20 es Se adi ia ants ain asi Gae o's wires aefr~t Selle +e » =") eeeinbretss 25, 40 0 LE Ae ne ae ne ee ae, ee! Ae 65 Cnn, LISSINiCEs GE 2... Seis. we an eka ine oe i Me - - COSY LLY 167 ea METER EEL TOT CHT AW DOLTION:. . Sich) < ofits oe ousiasca sco Ado in oe sie 2 dub pcotepmys. nieio dys sascuebarel emis 41 Vi. . PAGE Re) Se kat ners Merc es Sette tes Sean ne aioe em REA Se, ayant a> 2 LT lt eR re ee, ee ee ee eee 20 PE I Sg Po Spo 2 ee eb a fe ge Pee Leet o ee Leos sae een #8 24 Ie IAI, Nhs Ae SY ib ge ee etd fA NE eee eee ean | CRM Soa ts 3.45.04 28 oP She ne Py PACA les A oe TOS Fe 88 SPEIER oon Pus ds sk ved en oso ge Ste eR er er the aes 109 oO rc LA RPS Pel oe 104 EPRICE at on co S4 ee ete sips bed we een eas. se ee 107 La Sas ET Sites SSS ea oon ee RRM 4 aE Eee I ooo oe es wre cera s Saw bP asta reds ye asap on 59 SNE MEIER) td a eS TANS da oa Gown ve isa dus sedi da visa. 2 nn 101 RIE ete kee: (oe. 7 5.2 Shek teu c adi ecnse ess) a Sassi. enn 176 2A EL AEs en ne eS 29 RMSE MANOR os yo. oc a wl eke dows csv cde den es ives dass 87 NR ON OOA oe ioS atid Soak kek ed skeet bes bee oet esses onde 3 TIE MENES 6) Saya. ora alee le Vi ela'e'e ose clw's es ee eo co 128 MRAM DRONES retraite ae 08k oe Wie ek aS we Shae et cee cage + oer 81 PERERA CRURDEY =o Ste 2ST coe sci oe es be keene cu tac eg ee oe ss ie rn 163 RIN EIMEIEIIMON oe fc a le ePec e c nt wees vanes sn 107 RETIRE eR re aie ek cei es cscs vuataessedian nee 115, 119 PMunenneeCinet WALLA... ©. se) ted os. Coe seca wen cies se Sin ee URPRMDOIME MMO) ek Midas d ac ok gee wees stew esac tents se 120 EE CE ETL na ie fe irr 150 MEENA CHRIS on ayes sce fc... scene c eas leanne 14, 16, 19 Raspberry Culture................ ee ee eee 25 124 Re DOME ADDIG secs os ss h40. 3 28 eS els Se Ps wie, v's bo tad see ala a eg 91 OMIA SIOMUEOW 5 ai 4526 ¢0ste. nx ccaseseet ccc errr 132 RR MENERE Cas oC toa Peta Mire mies Fe. cs sss e's oe a we manne sonmnpping to London, Ianglind :. 2.2225 0.....0...1......:0..-5 5085 6 Beucuveimo for Bruit: Preservation... 5. si... fede cece ees tees ine 42 BIE PME LUAIDA (a arutais’s oo hciece de Lbied ON Leite cdeans cea ges se ae te 46 EEPROM TERE, 2, 0.5 cts sien etdiate awd GAN MAST aed Coe w at ca olds kee ne tee ae ee EME Cedi in etes aKet See eee ey ee die ees ae 23 RO EMBO A hl tia ccd ew Cuda g aeRO eve d Sates cca dail ce 0h can 0 en sali, NTN CRIES TONE: a nie aig, Sh ain carte Oe RT la inl cb eieic yet “oye 's bo e's Few ae eek es Seek somes. LOS SPE VRUE SON AIO TLUS NOUR Pied CAs tess gles es SOE PaaS Gv ede oak do les ke eo 65 IRONY FLOW MIOME i 45a WiPeteh se Calin eis eek elie s “aN beletla’e sew 2S 176 SEP ERCION SON MMNNLGEL 5 icc clas) diy ae 6-4 2.8 be EAT Hiabey oe vod ova ces sk cee 14, 17, 20 meewerry, Culiigumon and Kertinsing, 64.5 6.6 hides oS ccs sauce ew eeeeinn eb ss cee 129 Strawberry, Paper on.. Se ee Te ee ke eee er eR RL cl Me ipa 1s Strawberry in Simcoe “ey Gay, Ey 4Gis.s Line. Hy eee SOAS uk eee 2 ae 124 SE SAOUE SUPRROETY «0 ea eatpe do 0 0d tine view Werwie aed «el giniy ely (oe ee aie 127 SEU sic HARM ONire 0 a ike ines 0's we Wik! piwterw'ss that eh d w(atbtd” I QUA e Oe de ieee ties ys SR SOCOM SOT EP EGIG Ms vk cso cs caine arn anes spe Res sae AER 850 cots 167 Pace. IN I Grey RO ok ok cea Sia wie hig on ks Boia einen tan es eee ee eee 101 Superphosphates, to Make...............----- 05 suet e esses seen ee eee eee renee. 82 BT fie OE 0 Ie ee 88 RE ePURRTIUE OLIN MMMM in ks si a2 ose 25 = Danas Ses eae pase ae ewe re ees cowed 107 SITES le UE ee ee eae ea 131, 136 MOET (RIPEN Eire KS we in = = = PE em Bo sth ARN A eee kee 68 Trade in Fruit and Fruit Trees with United States .............. 0 -. 2222-2. 2s ee eee eee 153 mecasurer's Report... .:...-.-..5.-+----- PA ee Sie Mk 3 ens te war ee a atone gett anes 174 AI RAE i oc Si Po he rc cia ie os me im sialyl os 8 pd aslo ase wravela Weimaun's Bie’ \gie eS 0.0 19 RMI Oe 5 Oe oo Sk Aikido pis eh alte Sq 2 hie een Ais Be eae Ue wie 2 wld ied oe 10 0 ed gk coe cree nacre nol wis 2 Sie wa om mye wb dees Ago 2 2st calor 136 I AI RGEE Spot 0 = Fae Pc a aioe 2 28 Wem Ue kA pale sane ee Sas se eae 138 TERPS. Wes 5 ra ie Pew PSA dic Sinigl> - kare ois Bee es SE} 3's Lhe Hop 21 A Pd, I As aio eke hae © 2 tS So mE AY GS a oe ee aa eee 39 ESE SEEING 2.085) 7-81 Aer do) We aid ve sa icy Ao Gd A a rasa ns we haa S 94, 109 NEM GATE, MOLOUEES © 6 22 poco 2 et oc noe wae as We ice ee ce Sha oaehe soe eelen 49 ESPN, Tac Met oe fe. ai FI ME © Sane es woe ais Senn bio = se Se pate ed ser aie or 165 REE PIL SOS Heel ys. See Soe cere Coe Ss ema SEE ee oo ee. eee 34 ML AS CULine 504.00 So). wai SE Ae eels a. dios A Seas 139 HMC REE MER S . o. has tae) edna Mabon ol: Jose Se. SERS Ae es. Se 140 Web-worm, to Destroy...............-.--+- Tin GEN cc E/e- scans SO Ra Pe Oe Se a aie ees ee 3 Wilder, the late M. P....... Fe 5 ee eR na ae Ee EE ee lec Le ere Re a 7 SMMRRIIA RRR OKIOUCO'AG hoe. a... oo OF oe iets ie ee He eae ade eee eee emcee ese eee anes 168 RN 2h 2 5a

er 104 RAEN eer. s chen) a2) ss et icin '= abe ake sjnfax = > 2 ~~ - Ne 61 Morton, J. A., Director for District No. 10, Wingham.............-...--..---+.-. wy. fot Panton, M.A., Prof. J. H., Agricultural College, Guelph .............. . es Stee DOLE t ri Lb, (Le QS ES 0 a ve Gar ee ce, SS, eR 0 ee 126 OSE oe a ee eI, a a 30 NINETEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Phil e GROWERS “ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO. To the Honorable the Commissioner of Agriculture - Dear Si1r,—lI have pleasure in transmitting to you the Nineteenth Annual Report of the Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario, a volume containing an immense amount of the most valuable information on the subjects of fruit, flowers and forestry. Three public meetings for discussion have been held during the year, continuing for two days each. A most careful report of these meetings has been made by the aid of an able stenographer, which will, no doubt, aid materially in the progress and development of horticulture and sylviculture in our country. A volume of The Canadian Horticulturist for 1887 also accompanies this Report, a monthly journal which is highly appreciated by the members of our Association as a medium of communicating individual experience in practical horticulture, Trusting that the earnest efforts of the past year may be esteemed worthy of your approval, I have the honour to be, Sir, Your most obedient servant, L. WOOLVERTON, Secretary. OFFICERS FOR 1887-88. PRESIDENT: 2 EE LU re EI en ee Goderich ‘VicE-PRESIDENT : SSS ON ee en St. Catharines SECRETARY-TREASURER AND EDITOR LE EELS SLES a ee oe uetaeed Grimsby. DIRECTORS : eo SS WD Orit John Croil, Aultsville. : Agricultural Division No. 2...... ane are te epeuee ota: ates A. A. Wright, Renfrew. . ™*°4 Asrientsural Division No, 3.1)... 025 ee he wets Rey. Geo. Bell, LL.D., Kingston. Pamemtntal aivision NO. -4.5...5. 5... essed ewes P. C. Dempsy, Trenton. emmcuitenl PiIVISIOn INO, Di... ee eo ee eee oe Thos. Beall, Lindsay. meerricusural Wivision UNG. 9G). 20s. le she ee Se esse oe W. E. Wellington, Toronto. MAMICOMMMEMOINIEION INO: AF. onc... cece ot tenes s Murray Pettit, Winona. ericultum) Division No. 8.25... oe Sy ce eee A. H. Pettit, Grimsby. meterlorat aviator, NO oO. 2 nie ee we eek seme s Fred. Mitchell, Innerkip. Pee veo NO. LO ss loos 5 cele ane coin es J. A. Morton, Wingham. memmculnural-ivision NO. It eT J. M. Denton, London. merenitiral Division No. 12... -....2- 2.0.6 selon Albert Hill, Wyoming. Sereultural Divison Noo 15... 2. eee ect eo G. ©. Caston, Craighurst. AUDITORS : MMI Ee ete tic Mee hk «vc ce kone Cole ne cee eee Crown Hill. RR CM a ie bs gn 5d SS Lis ow ww gin ws sj a.sc0 sea aie = shot eae gee EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE : The President, | The Vice-President. The Secretary. FINANCE CoMMITTEE : EE OURS Se en reer SET Grimsby: NM aM NT aloe ain vind ae8 kn nad ss oe cd ais one Ua oa ee Winona. IOI 5s. 7 MMMM Nef RNG! siatule a das Sees one voces cash ve te Lindsay. THE PRESIDENTS ANNUAL ADDRESS. At the annual meeting of the Association, held at Grimsby, in the county of Lincoln, on the 28th and 29th of September, 1887, the president, Alex. McD. Allan, Esq., of ' Goderich, delivered the following address : LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, MEMBERS OF THE ONTARIO Fruit Growers’ ASSocIATION :— Probably no point in this Province could have been so appropriately chosen for our annual gathering as this beautiful village of Grimsby, embedded in the midst of the fruit Eden of Ontario. A few amongst us, whose heads have grown hoary under a weight of years, can look back to the early days when this great Niagara district, as well as the rest of our Pro- vince, was largely a forest, broken only by occasional small clearings and rough roadways leading to small villages of seldom more than a dozen cottages each. Society, as under- stood now-a-days, had no place in our country then, and yet these. old pioneers assure us that those were among their happiest days. Along with the hardest of daily toil they held converse with nature and all her charms. Neighbours were dear to each other, they consulted together in everything ; their feelings and interests were the same; a universal friendship prevailed. “* There is a pleasure in the pathless woods, ** There is a rapture by the lonely shore, ‘* There is society where none intrudes, ‘* By the deep sea, and music in its roar— ** We love not man the less, but nature more “ Tn these our interviews.” And yet now-a-days we frequently hear of those whose great desire is to leave the farm and seek the town or city in quest of so-called society. The question is often asked, “ Why do young men Jeave the farm?” Looking at this question from a horti- cultural standpoint, I am satisfied that, amongst other replies, it may be answered that early training has much to do with it. If boys were trained to give a reason for every piece of work done ; to know something of the science of tilling the soil, the “ whys” and “ wherefores” of everything connected with agriculture and horticulture, and above all, to create in the youthful mind a desire to search more deeply into nature and its great works, we would hear less of this desire to keep aloof from the industry of agri- culture. Interest each child in some plant or flower, and as he or she grows older that interest will grow, and the desire will become keener to search more deeply into nature’s great fields. There is nothing that will make so marked an impression for good, for tender, refined feeling in our children as to lead them into a study of the works of our great Creator in the forest as well as the fruitful fields, orchards and gardens. These early lessons are remembered through life, for the interest is kindled in school days when habits are forming. The school house as well as the school yard should contain a sort of Kindergarten or object lesson, and every child should have some special tree, plant or flower to care for. I believe this matter should receive the deepest attention, not only from all parents, but also from our educational departments and seats of learning, and I trust this Association will continue to work towards such a desirable end. I believe our common school system of studies is getting beyond the requirements of our country and its best interests, inasmuch as it is calculated to induce our young men and women to leave the field and orchard and seek some profession or other calling in life. Agriculture and its sister horticulture demand the brightest and best of our sons and daughters, and the best interests of our country demands their study and labour too. [If an interest in these studies were created in schools I believe ere long we could find a more general desire, and a more intelligent desire in the rising generation to excel in these sciences. Such a study would tend to make better men and women of our children. Lead a boy to take an interest in the cultivation of some tree, plant or flower and you make an impression upon his young mind that will deepen with age ; it will have an elevating tendency in his nature, a refining influence on his character that will, as he grows older, lead those he comes in contact with, to point up to him as one of “‘nature’s noblemen.” Under the influence of such studies we would have fewer criminals and a more prosperous as well as a better and happier people. Since our last annual meeting it has been my pleasant Jot to assist in representing Canada at the Colonial and Indian Exhibition in London, England, in the interests of fruit growers and shippers. As you are already well acquainted with the nature and extent of our fruit display on that occasion, it is not necessary to enlarge upon that. Suffice it to say that it was at once the largest and finest display of fruits ever seen, not only in Britain, but in all Europe. Our Dominion Government could not have done anything to so thoroughly correct the erroneous impressions of our country held by the people generally in the old world as by placing before them to see, feel and taste the luscious fruits of our orchards, gardens and vineyards. That exhibit did more for our country than all the literature and emigration agents could have accomplished in a quarter of a century. Our fruits told dwellers in Britain of a climate far superior to anything they had given Canada credit for, and the variations of that climate stretching from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Some years ago I made the statement at one of our meetings that I believed we could grow the finest apples in the world. My experience in Britain’s markets, where I met apples from almost all other fruit growing countries, has confirmed the impression. We have struck the happy medium in climate and soil in order to produce apples of the highest degree of excellence in flavour, form and colour. Our apples have taken the British buyers by storm, and consumers there will not purchase any others so long as they can obtain a suitable article from us. Britain wants the best, and the best only. There is no better market for a choice article, and I do not know so poor a market for an inferior article. Canada has gained a good name for generally honest culling and packing, and it is absolutely necessary that we do not allow a spot to I wish my words could reach the ears of every orchardist as well I would entreat of them, not only for their own best tarnish our character. as shippers in our fair country. interests, but also for the sake of the fair fame of our country, to exercise the greatest care in the cultivation, selection and packing of our fruits. Let the grower see to it that he leaves nothing undone that can be done to excel in the production of the choicest fruits, and that when he comes to dispose of it, to allow nothing pass to the shipper but the best. Above all things, teach your children to be scrupulously honest in picking and culling out the apples ready for packing. Never encourage a child to think it smart to get a spotted or wormy apple off on the buyer, by hiding it in the middle of the basket or barrel. Be honest towards your children, yourself, your customers and your country, and you will not only have the satisfaction of reaping reach pecuniary rewards but of being a benefit to your country, a guide to your associates, and an instructor for every- thing that is just and right in your own family. Let the shipper see to it also that he acts in strictest honesty with his customers. Let the brand always indicate truly what the barrel contains. Let every specimen be sound and clean for a good brand of fruit. And if a choice lot is wanted, they should be made of even size and good colour in the barrel. Under no circumstances let the brand indicate anything better than the fruit in the barrel fairly demands. A more difficult question now comes, namely, to whom shall we ship? All the fruit markets of Britain are full of so-called fruit brokers, whose only desire seems to be to make their commissions, and they always do this, no matter how they may sacrifice the interests of the shipper. This class of brokers are what we know as curbstone brokers, and are irresponsible. In conversation, they are quite persuasive, “child-like and bland,” as Bret Harte would put it ; but do not trust them. Then there is a large class of brokers who, although they are financially responsible, they have not the accommodation to hold fruit in storage, or they do not care to so far consider the inter- ests of the shipper as to hold for favourable markets, but force everything off at auction no matter what may be the state of the market. By all means, it is to our best interests to avoid this class. There is a class of brokers again, who are interested in retail fruit stores, the result of which is that when they handle fruit on consignment the interests of the shipper are cruelly sacrificed, and these retailers are supplied at prices that ensure large profits to the broker. But there is still left a thoroughly responsible and trust- worthy class who do all they can to protect the interests of the shippers, and where there is any possibility of realising prices that will ensure profit to the consignor, they will invariably accomplish that desirable end at a very reasonable cost. You will find this class of dealers often at the dock or railway depot examining the goods sent, and trying to make sale to some retailers without incurring cartage or market expense. During my four months’ stay in Britain [ visited all the fruit markets, searched out the various classes of dealers and their ways of doing business, and hence I know wheveof I speak. It would take up too much space to attempt to name firms, but at any time I will be pleased to give every information in my possession to those who desire to ship, I can recommend good responsible houses in most of the chief towns and cities, whose business records have been looked into or tested. Generally speaking, it is a mistake to ship on consignmeut to any but the three great distributing centres of trade, I mean London, Liverpool and Glasgow. There is another important point I desire shippers to notice, it is this: That the experience of the past has shewn that fruit shipped to London direct by water, has received much more damage in transit than when shipped vid Liver- a, a PSSST ey ed AS ‘ pool and thence by rail to London. It is a very common thing to find in cargoes shipped direct to London by water, barrels with only a few pecks in them, and from the fact that the few left are clean, fine samples, it is natural to conclude that they have been tam- pered with either when passing up the Thames or when in charge of the dock com- panies. I have made frequent visits to the docks to see cargoes discharged, and almost always remarked an amount of careless handling that was startling. Barrels of apples standing in the storage sheds open and passers by having every chance to pilfer that could be desired. I remonstrated with these dock companies, and for the time being things were attended to better ; but, no doubt, when my back was turned the same eare- lessness was repeated. [ would, theretore, advise shippers to ship to London always wid Liverpool. ‘This has a further advantage of an extra market, as if the consignee in London finds he can sell to advantage considering the difference in freight by stopping the cargo and disposing of it in Liverpool, he will do so. British railways are a huge monopoly, the result of which is that they so combine in freight charges as to put it beyond the inter ests of shippers to send consignments direct to inland cities and towns. They do not carry at a proportionately low rate compared with our through rates to British ports. Our markets for apples are extending, and there is no doubt but they will extend still farther within a few years, as the high flavour, beauty in form and colour and keeping qualities of our apples becomes more widely known. A very fine line of business was opened last year with buyers for the markets of Norway, Sweden and Denmark, and by exercising care in selecting and packing, this trade can be largely increased. I am confident that by proper management a good trade can be established with these countries in dried fruits as well as canned goods. Then, with the connection of a fast line of steamships on the Pacific Ocean with our Canadian Pacific Railway, our apples will find a profitable market in the far East. There is still another market nearer home that will prove one of the most important to growers in Ontario. I refer to our own great North- west. Even now, although the population is small and very scattered, the trade has assumed wonderful proportions. And it has one very desirable feature, in that it isa market for our early and fall apples, that would otherwise be of comparatively little value. Of course there are some fall apples that we can ship to Britain profitably under some circumstances. If the British, Belgian and German crops are short, then our fall apples, if carried in good order, will command about the same prices in Britain that winter sorts bring. But if there is a surplus in the countries that supply Britain with that class of apple, as well «s a fair crop in Britain herself, then we must seek another market for early and fall kinds. The same thing does not hold good to the same extent as regards winter varieties. Nearly all the kinds grown in Belgium and Germany for export are what we would call fall cookers ; they have very little if any colour and their flavour is generally somewhat insipid. The result is that however large these crops may be (the British crop included) they cannot find profitable sale when our .winter fruit appears in the markets. Of fall varieties we have one that is sure of ready sale at high prices. I refer to the Gravenstein. Even this season it has sold as high as $6.00 per barrel ; St Lawrence has made $4.20, and Colvert $4.05 for good samples. 7 If our ae companies would provide a cold blast for the compartment where fruit is stored it would be a boon to shippers and consumers alike, as that would ensure fruit carrying without the slightest damage by heating. The introduction of a cold blast would not necessitate much if any expense to the Company, and would, I believe, greatly facilitate and ensure the interests of all concerned. With its aid we could successfully ship such apples as Duchess of Oldenburg, and realize high prices. And if the market demand would permit, even such pears as Clapps’ Favorite, Bartlett, Flemish Beauty and Boussock could be shipped. In shipping our winter apples, shippers would find it greatly to their advantage to provide good storage so that varieties could be sent forward in proper season when the market demand is best for each particular variety. It is folly to send a mixed cargo at an early season, as there is then no proper demand for a long keeping kind. Shipments should continue through winter until early spring. Such a season as the present, if I were advising shippers as to the order in which special kinds should be shipped, it would be thus : In September and first week of October ship all Twenty-Ounce, and Ribston’s, and Blenheims; follow this with Kings. Send some Baldwins and Greenings through November and December, finishing shipments of these kinds in January. The first Spies should be sent forward in December, and continued on through January into February. Ontario and Wagner will also cover the same season. Hold the Russets until March, if possible, along with Mann, and send them forward then as the demand rises, taking care to examine every barrel before leaving the storehouse to see that there is no decay or shrinkage. Other kinds that I have not named can be sent forward in their proper season for using. But the time for shipping must be determined each season according as the crop matures early or late. It is invariably a good time to ship extra large and fine specimens about the first of December, so as to get the Christmas market on or about the 15th of that month. In any case, it pays to store long keepers here rather than ship early, as they will realize much better prices, besides keeping better in this dry climate that in thé damp and clammy winters of Britain. The large grape crop of the present season and the exceedingly low prices, causes the growers to ask what are the prospects of obtaining markets for an increasing supply ? I firmly believe that if proper cold storage can be secured on the steamships, Britain will soon prove to be a good market for our open air grapes. But as the taste for them is one that must be acquired largely, such a trade must be approached with all due care. The only class of grape consumers in Britain are those who can afford to pay very high prices for hot-house varieties, and those who are satisfied with the poor quality of the ordinary Spanish white grape of commerce. I have no doubt at all that our grapes would find a ready class of consumers if once introduced in competition with the Spanish grape. It will be necessary to test various ways of carrying our grapes and various packages, so as to ensure their arrival in perfect condition. Those packed in berry boxes tightly enclosed in a case containing some ten or a dozen such boxes, carried better than in any other way to the Colonial at London last year. The square boxes used last year for apples and pears were not after all so serviceable as good neat barrels. Fruit could not be packed tightly in the boxes, and hence bruised badly. Undoubtedly the barrel is by far the best package yet tried for apples fand when the quarter hoops are driven down far enough to allow the barrel roll upon them, it saves the fruit from bruising in the bilge of the barrel. I cannot too severely condemn employees of railways and steamships for the rough mannerin which they handle every kind of fruit package. Of the fruits shipped to the Colonial Exhibition, fully ten per cent. of the apples were damaged, twenty per cent. of pears, and ninety per cent. of plums and grapes. The express companies were no exception. It is high time that something were done to compel these corporations to exercise neces- ° sary care in handling packages. Both growers and shippers will be anxious to hear something about market prospects , Reports in the newspapers have been discouraging alike to grower and shipper, but as I was receiving widely different reports at the same time, I concluded that the published reports were from a class of fruit brokers who would like very well to see shippers make a little profit in order to hold their trade, and hence they sent out werd that export apples shouldbe purchased at thirty to forty per cent. lower than last year, as the British and Euro- pean crop was very large. These brokers would like to see shippers make their profit on this side of the ocean by reducing the price to the grower, instead of in the markets of Britain. No doubt early prospects were in favour of a generally good crop in Europe, but. what are the facts now? Britain passed through a long, tedious and severe winter, a cold, backward spring, and a summer of unusual heat and drought. It is generally admitted throughout Kent (and this county sends more apples to the London market than any other) that the aggregate yield of marketable fruit will not exceed an average crop, and these are mainly early kinds. In midland counties prospects are less favourable than last year. Orchards have suffered severely from continued drought and blight, and growers agree that the crop will be under an average. The west or cider counties report a small crop of doubtful quality. In the north, where the cultivation of the apple is only nominal, indications point to an average crop of fair quality. Taken altogether, we are safe to conclude that the apple crop of the United Kingdom will not exceed that of 1886, with quality and size of samplesinferior. Another point I may here mention that is well worth remembering ; it is this: that British apples are mostly cookers, and it is rare to find an apple grown there combining both cooking and dessert qualities. This and a most important point, they concede readily to Canada. Advices from the chief shipping ports of France, as well as the interior, agree that the quantity of apples suitable for the English markets will about equal that of last year. In the south-west Rennets and Dieudonne’s promise fairly, but it is admitted by shippers that the quantity available for export is yearly less important ; it is said that the shade of the apple trees is injurious to the vines amongst which they grow, and that when the trees die out they are not generally replaced. Reports from the apple sections of Belgium and Holland indicate an average yield of early kinds, which are all disposed of before this date. Late varieties, which are exten- sively grown for the English markets, are a fairly good crop, and shippers claim the winter export trade will be fair. The outlook in Germany is favourable, but advices from Hamburg, Stettin and the interior cannot at present be relied upon with any degree of certainty. Howeyer, the quantity available for export is never large, and it is probable that local consumption will exhaust the supply. Shipments of early apples from Fortugal commenced in June. Prices ate low owing to the inferiority of this fruit. Crops are reported light, and arrivals after September, if any, will have no influence on the British markets. Therefore, I conclude that shippers should make more money in the British-markets this year than was realized last year, and if they fail to do so it must certainly be on account of the inferiority of their brand. After visiting many orchards in various parts of Britain and discussing apple-growing with growers and dealers, I have arrived at the conclusion that British growers have become discouraged, and hence the fact that hundreds of acres of orchards are sadly neglected, and are in a state of decay. Many kinds have been grown that are mere cum- berers of the ground. Indeed, for siany years past, there has been a practical dearth of home grown apples in the Brisish markets, in consequence of inclement weather in the autumn preventing the maturing of the wood, and keen frosts in late spring destroying the blossom. Apple growing in Britain is rapidly waning, and there are some like indica- tions throughout Europe. In the United States the crop varies as it does in our own country. We do not find that competition in our own North-west that we have had on account of the smallness of the crop, even of early fruit in Missouri. The apple crop for all Western States, taken as a whole, is under the average considerably. In New York there will be about half a crop, with Newtown’s scarce, and in the Eastern States the crop is scarcely any better. Altogether, the apples for export from the States will be under that of last year considerably. The Nova Scotia crop is scarcely up to a half. Our own crop for export will be under that of last year, but the sample of fruit will be better. There is rejoicing all over our land by growers and shippers on account of the absence of the fungus spot, even Fameuse is perfectly clean this year, and contrary to earlier expectations samples will be fully up in size with superb colouring. A word still to the shippers and I leave this question. Packed and ready for ship- ment, it is for the exporter to decide with promptitude, if he has not already done so, as to the market to which he will consign his fruit. It is a mistake to have fixed ideas on this subject. Putting all your eggs in one basket means success or failure, and is opposed to the best rules of business. It may be difficult for shippers to come to a decision as to the best market to take. Too much reliance should not be placed upon market reports mailed from broking firms, for they are, as a rule, apart from prices actually realised, couched in language sufficiently encouraging to induce shippers to consign to Liverpool when they should take London or Glasgow, or vice versa. Market forecasts too are usually held out as one would wish them to be, rather than as they are likely to be. The necessity of always making arrangements with the steamship agents well in advance of contemplated shipments, in order to avoid being shut out, must also be borne in mind. Those who have had their fruit shut out, and have been compelled to await the following steamer, know from experience the value of this suggestion. Influence shouid also be brought to bear on the agents in regard to the storage of the fruit. Apples should never be stowed under or mixed with general or any other cargo, and they should always be stowed away from all heating influences, Among new fruits likely to find a place in general cultivation, I would name my old friend Mr. P. C. Dempsey’s new pear, which I shall here name “ Dempsey.” It is a cross between Bartlett and Duchess D’Angouleme, and bears not only the markings of both parents well blended together, but also flavour and’ season of ripening well defined. I believe this pear will yet come in as one of the most valuable on our list. I earnestly wish growers would strive, by hybridization and the growing of seedlings, to produce a winter pear of size and excellence. Take for your aim, for example, the Vicar for size and Josephene De Malmis for quality. Mr. Dempsey has also produced a new apple, the Trenton, by crossing the Golden Russet and Spy. The Trenton has the appearance as if of the Fameuse family ; form and size goes with the Russet parent ; flavour richer than Fameuse and colour more intense and covering. In plums, I do not know anything that has taken my fancy for general purposes as the Prune, grown at Collingwood. I have had an opportunity of tasting the fruit this season and, if I may judge by the few specimens sent to me, [ must pronounce it much superior to the well known German Prune in flavour. It is of good size and in general appearance resembles German Prune, and is a splendid shipper. Growers in Collingwood report that they can make more money out of this than any other variety. The system of judging fruits at Fairs must be improved upon and conducted scientifi- cally or exhibitors will not derive any practical benefits, and growers will be kept in the dark, as in the past. A scale should be adopted with maximum points for each variety, the highest number being the maximum of the most valuable fruits. A scale of one to ten would cover all, and if introduced and used by all judges, we would find a decided improvement in the growing of only the best kinds. All fruits should be judged upon points, and the man who is not able to give such a judgment should not be employed. The single judge system would have the effect of weeding out incompetent men, and I believe the sooner it is adopted by Exhibition Associations, in the horticultural depart- ment at all events, the better for all concerned. The English sparrow is still widening its field of mischief. This season I lost two trees of Huling’s Superb plums by the sparrow, and many others complain of its depreda- tions among the piums and grapes. As soon as the fruit ripens well they seem to pick holes to extract the juices, probably to quench thirst; at all events they take a marvel- lously short time to destroy a crop of plums. My two trees of Huling’s Superb were loaded and I was not able to find a whole plum in three days from ripening. Growers are reporting some new feature of evil in the sparrow from time to time, and I hope this Association will take the matter up at an early day, and if possible suggest a remedy. After a winter of more than usual severity and a summer of extraordinary heat and drouth, we are early into fall weather. Already we can almost say : ‘* Leaves are dead and woods are red, Autumn skies are soft and pale.” The orchardist should make early provision for winter. Our thanks as fruit-growers are due to the Dominion Government for the good done 11 in our interests and for our country through the Colonial Exhibition. Personally, I would not feel that I had done justice if I neglected to refer to the very many courtesies, the prompt attentions and interest in the welfare of Canada, expressed in the actions of Sir Charles Tupper, our High Commissioner, who was ever ready and willing to do all that was possible in every way to advance the fruit interests of Canada. Nor can I for- get the cheerful attentions and quick, executive ability of Mr. C. C. Chipman, the Cana- dian Accountant in London. And I feel under deep, personal obligations to Mr. J. B. Thomas, of Covent Garden Market, London, one of the oldest and foremost fruit dealers of Britain, for innumerable acts of kindness in assisting me to gain information concern- ing the trade. And now, my friends, before closing, let me ask one and all to work, speak, write and think for the interests of horticulture. Enlist the sympathies of your friends and neighbours ; spread everywhere the necessity of cultivation, more planting, growing only the best varieties, and buying and selling honestly. In our Association we want all classes of our people, especially do we want the influence of woman, and I believe even now our women are fairly enlisted and willing to work for the grand elevative interests of horticulture. Let us work up enthusiasm in our subject, and thus solidly and surely elevate the standard of everything that is good. There is room always for improvement, and we should never rest fully satisfied with the results of past experiments, but go on © working up to a high ideal and encouraging others to work too. “ Let us act that each to-morrow Find us farther than to-day.” 12 THE WINTER MEETING. The Winter Meeting was held in the Town Hall, Chatham, on Wednesday and Thursday, the 9th and 10th of February, 1887. The President, A. McD. Allan, Esq., in calling the meeting to order, expressed a hope that the local members and visitors from the County of Kent, of whom there was a fair attendance, would freely avail themselves of the opportunity of taking part in the debates of the Association, one of the especial objects of holding the meeting in Chatham being that points in regard to fruit culture in the County of Kent might be brought for- ward. A CIVIC WELCOME Mr. H. A. Patterson, Mayor of Chatham, then extended a welcome to the Associa- tion, on behalf of the Town Council and inhabitants of Chatham, in the following terms :— GENTLEMEN,—It affords me great pleasure to have the honour of welcoming your Association to Chatham. I have no formal address to offer—no written address,—but will, in a few words, offer you that welcome on behalf of the inhabitants of Chatham. There are few parts of this Dominion in which the fruit-grower has so many things lavished upon him by nature as in this County of Kent, and I much regret that a far more lively interest has not been evinced in this meeting by the fruit-growers of this vicinity, though I am confident that later on in your proceedings you will find a great increase in attendance. [again bid you welcome io Chatham, and am confident that your treatment here will be such that you will go away, feeling that Chatham is at least not the most forsaken place in the world. The President, on behalf of the Association, thanked the Mayor for the cordial wel- come extended, assuring him that the meeting at Chatham had been looked forward to with interest by them, and would doubtless be long remembered. They were well aware that Chatham was the chief town in one of the most important agricultural counties of the Province of Ontario, which was saying a good deal, and that the County of Kent was making its mark in the Province. He felt assured that the attendance, though com- paratively small at the time of opening, would be larger during the progress of the meet- ing, and that the discussions carried on would be marked by ardour and ability. As he had other remarks to make at a subsequent stage of the meeting, he would not now tres- pass further on the time at command, but proceed with the programme. . THE FRUIT GARDEN FOR HOME USE. The Secretary read the following paper, contributed by Mr. B. Gott, of Arkona : GENTLEMEN,—The word “ garden” comes to us through the Anglo-Saxon tongue and is derived from the old German gart, and signified a piece of ground enclosed for the purpose of growing vegetables, flowers, etc., for the family. The Latins used the word « hortus” for the same purpose, hence also we have our significant word “horticulture.” I may be allowed to remark, in the first place, that as the word garden purports so our ideas always point to an enclosed or guarded piece of ground in which flowers, vegetables, ee ——— 13 fruits, etc., are ia ee cared for and grown, We, therefore, have but little sympathy either with the teachings or practices of some in our day, who discard the idea of an enclosure and place their feeble efforts at gardening anywhere in the open field without marks or protection, and are at once liable to the inroads of cattle and depredators, and to be changed from year to year. On the contrary, we say, fence a spot of ground, large or small, somewhere on the farm most convenient and best adapted for the purposes designed ; let that spot of ground become sacred to those purposes and forever known as the home garden, and untrod by depredators of any kind and unbrowsed by hungry cattle, or untouched by devouring pig. There the various fruit, floral or vegetable relics, peacefully, securely and tenderly rest and thrive from year to year, and there are planted for future bloom or fruct the newest and choicest importations and the latest purchases obtainable, There the members of the family stroll at eventide and there they walk at early morn to see the late developments. There they practise their interesting art and tickle the fertile earth, and there they learn over new lessons of use- fulness and genial profit. From thence they minister to each other wonder and delight, and foster the good of each. The fence about the plot, whether square, rectangular or oblong in form, or whether large or small, may be both ornamental and useful, but, of course, the useful is the essential idea. It should be straight, strong, light, and as durable as possible. The best garden fences are made of good cedar posts and durable pickets, but many beautiful, serviceable fences are lately being made of posts and wires, ornamentally fashioned, and are recommendable if not made of barbed wires. The idea attached to a fence is protec- tion to that within and freedom from harbourings of all nuisances and all destroyers. It need not necessarily be very expensive, but it must be effective and as durable as possible, not necessarily close and high, like an old English fence, to hide from view all that is within, but it must be strong and it may be as beautiful as possible. The requirements of the home garden differ very greatly in accordance with the position, the intelligence, the character and the number of those composing the home. ‘The best idea of home to us is that of an assemblage of friends and those we love under a common roof. It is the habitation of a family of friends mutually working for each other’s good and well-being both here and hereafter. Let us then picture to ourselves such a home amongst the middle classes of our beautiful country, where we have many of them, and consisting of eight persons of different ages, father and mother and six children, half boys, a circumstance not by any means difficult to find, and may fitly be called a model family. The family so constituted will require then a plot of ground liberal in its dimensions, the form and shape of it makes but little difference, but it should be convenient and a rich, well drained loamy soil. The whole should be thoroughly and systematically planted with all the various and best fruits of the season. I shall not attempt in this connection the larger or orchard fruits, as apples, pears, etc., since these cannot properly be brought into the list for home garden culture. Neither shall I take into account here the questions of culture and prepara- tion of soil, laying out the beds their sizes and shapes, or whether there shall be any beds at all or not. Our duty will be rather the consideration of the kinds of fruits to plant. I would suggest that regularity of design or plan be adopted as may best suit the loca- tion and the family tastes and needs. The old forms cf dividing the plot into exact squares with posts from 6 to 8 feet in width, leading all round and the borders of these squares regularly planted with gooseberry or currant bushes, raspberry or strawberry plants need not necessarily be followed, but I would strongly recommend a system or plan of some sort simple and easily worked, and according to which even the visitor may know how to find the class of fruits he is in search of. I may suggest, too, some flowers in the garden. I do not know here how far you will be disposed to agree with me, but on account of my prevailing whim, I venture to broach it. I do so much love to see the flowers “‘that ever turn towards the sun,” as the Helianthus and the ever-varied and gay-coloured Phloxes, with many other favourites, that [ should be strongly tempted to stick them into every vacancy to bloom by the pathway. And then they are such an attraction, you know. The implements and accessories of the garden should be plentiful and efficient. The ordinary implements for stirring the soil, and keeping it well pulverized and free from 14 weeds, must be close at hand for ready and constant use whenever needed. Implements for pruning, training, grafting, shearing, clipping, etc., must also be in good condition and ready for use in proper time and season. I would further suggest that a cheap but serviceable greenhouse be provided. Perhaps you will think this superfluous, but in the experience of many years it is found to be advan- tageous and profitablee How many new kinds of fruit plants you recelve In an enfeebled condition, or perhaps in the cold of winter, could be nursed and cared for here and brought safely through? Again, how much profitable testing, experimenting and propagating may be quietly done here, even in the slack months? This is all very inter- esting and very profitable. In this connection cellars and storehouses are absolutely needed and must be provided. These must be ample and commodious, free from excessive dampness and from frost and vermin. Theirinside must be well ventilated and pure, and provided with slatted slide boxes and cribs for the hardier fruits, and commodious shelves for the smaller ones during the winter. These must be directed by circumstances. I should like to say a word or two about fruit preservation. This is one of the most important questions connected with the whole subject of fruit supply. The methods of canning and preserving that must be understood are now so many and so varied that this alone would form an ample theme of itself ; but they must be all known and practised in order to have a liberal supply of good and wholesome fruit for the table whenever the supply outside is no longer obtainable. Evaporation by means of artificial process, as is now practised, is one of the best methods for supplying the larger and fleshy in all seasons. For the berries and other delicate fruits, canning and conserving are the methods most resorted to, and eminently good and satisfactory. After those necessary digressions that will meet your approval, I shall come at once to speak as briefly as possible of the fruits themselves in order. The strawberry, in its earliness, its simplicity of treatment and ready growth, and in its fine and delicate internal and external qualities, must be the first on the list of desirable fruits for family use. In obtaining plants of this fruit the question of length of season should be in view. We advise to secure good healthy plants, as near at home as possible, and plant them in the spring of the year, in rows 2 feet apart and 12 inches in the rows, on good dry previously prepared soil. I cannot now detain you by descriptions of the varieties mentioned, but shall simply state the names of those I think the most deserving of notice and in the order of their qualities and season of ripening. For early, Canada, Bidwell, Crescent, Ontario, Manchester, Daniel Boone, Wilson and Mr. Henderson’s. new one ‘“ King of the North.’ For medium, the Crimson Cluster, Henderson, both new ones. For late, Prince of Berries, Maggie and Jewel. The last mentioned is Mr. Augur’s new strawberry from Connecticut, and is by many strides the most valuable and promising berry I have yet seen. The whole of those named need not necessarily be planted at once, unless the demand is for novelties and variety, but enough of them may for good family supply. The raspberry is properly the succeeding family fruit of the season, and cannot now be dispensed with. It is very popular, easily grown on almost any soils, and possesses so many réally good qualities of merit, that it asks or need no recommendations from me. The varieties, like those of the strawberry, are fortunately very various and very many to choose from. For early reds, the Hansell, Marlboro’, Herstine, Turner, Red Antwerp. and Franconia. For late, Clarke and Cuthbert, the last having more good qualities in it” than any other one berry amongst us. For early, black, Tyler, Souhegan, Seneca. For late, Mammoth Cluster, Gregg and Shaffer. For beautiful yellow or white nothing can be finer than Caroline and Brinckle’s Orange. The last mentioned is the highest and best flavoured of all, and although a little tender in the cane, yet by selecting favourable spots to grow it, or by laying it down in the winter, it may be made eminently successful. The blackberry, for family use, is not so greatly favoured as the fore-mentioned, and chiefly for the reason that the canes cannot be made so snug, neat and inoffensive as they, but the fruit is most delightful and highly relished. Though we acknowledge, to some extent, the justness of this complaint, yet we insist that there need not be so much com- 15 plaining if proper methgds of pruning and training are adopted. It is well known that the Americans grow acres upon acres of them, and without unusual trouble. The new Canadian blackberry, called Gainor, is said to have many good qualities, and we know the Snyder to be almost all that could be desired. But no blackberry has appeared with such large, fine and delicious flavoured fruits as the famed Kittatinny, which you may lant. ; Gooseberries are becoming more and more a popular fruit, in great demand, and no family fruit garden could, for a moment, be considered well stocked without a liberal supply of these in their best sorts. The new American gooseberry, Industry, offered by Mr. Barry, is known to be very good, hardy and productive. Good things are also said of Prof. Saunders’ Pearl. We have had a large experience with Houghton, Smith’s Improved and Downing, all very good. The English sorts Crown Bob and White Smith, may be grown, with care, and are then very large and fine. All these sorts may be improved by sulphuring as a precaution against mildew, etc. Currants must also form a part of every collection of family fruits. They are good growers, sure bearers and always reward the care and attention given to them. The famed Fay’s Prolific is good, but is nothing better or different, as we can see, from the older and tried sort called Cherry. Both will yield results as nearly identical as possible. Raby Castle and Old Red Dutch are very prolific and good. For black, Lee’s Prolific and Black Naples can be relied upon. For white, the White Grape and the White Dutch are both delightful and will fill the bill. I scarcely know whether I shall have space or whether you will forbear with me should I include in this list the popular and delicious fruits known amongst us as cher- ries, plums and peaches. They are all very attractive, and in their place and season, there is nothing that can supplant them. All families like them, and when the fruit can be had in proper quality and quantity they are very profitable. But there’s the “ rub,” for during the last few years past these tine fruits have been conspicuous by their absence, and in many localities they were not very encouraging. Nevertheless, it may be well for: a family to attempt a few of them in their most desirable varieties. Hardy grapes are, perhaps, the most popular fruits produced amongst us, and can be grown so easily in greater variety and greater excellence in all the colours of red, white and black than any other. It is our firm belief that any family owning but a small piece of ground can make grapes the best fruits to plant, and can grow more of them than any other. . Even outside locations all along by the fences, and even the walls of the buildings, may be made very serviceable for grapes, and the general appearance of the whole improved by them. We would advise then, every family, by all means to plant some grapes. Plant a sufficiency for the liberal use of the family and enough to last till grapes come again. For a family as presupposed, a vineyard of say 50 plants, well cared for, will give them a return that will be at once grateful and gratifying. Plant two-year- old plants in well prepared ground eight feet by twelve feet, thoroughly cultivate the ground and keep it clean. In two years the vines will begin to show a supply of tempting and delicious fruit. If in the open air ground, they should then be trellised by planting eight feet posts in the rows between the plants, and firmly fixing three wires to them, and have the canes fastened to these. We have known vines trellised thus to produce 20 lbs, each the third year. Last year our own 200 vines produced an average over the whole of 224 lbs., and realized for us a good sum. The varieties of grapes are now very great and very different, and the choice of these is a very important matter. For black, we give the preference to Moore’s Early as the best early grape on the list, and Worden’s seedling next. Concord is the most popular and is a very good and profitable grape. Wilder is very large and very good, known also as Roger No. 4; it is, indeed, the largest grape in cultivation amongst us. For red, we say Brighton is at the head of the list ; it is also very profitable. Lindley and Delaware are good and should not be omitted.. We fruited Jefferson last year, and it is very fine indeed. For white, the claimants are being multiplied, but the best in our culture is Lady, and the next Jessica. Niagara has a good deal said about it and it may be good, and we know that Golden Pocklington is so. From*ourjreading of the recommendation, we should think that the new grape “‘ Empire State” is something immense, that’s all we 16 Ce OE ESS ESE know about it. Any family who takes these fine fruits and succeeds with them to any-_ thing near their capabilities, will be so far pleased with the results that they will not regret any amount of labour or pains spent upon them. Of nectarines and quinces, I do not know how to recommend them. The nectarine — is, indeed, a very desirable fruit, but it is in vain to try to grow it in exposed places or — where you cannot succeed with plums. Quinces are not grown as much as they should be, and for the reason that their use is not understood. It is a question just where — they come in, in family economy. The best quince is the Orange that can be nicely grown in favourable places. Of mulberries, dewberries, huckleberries and cranberries, it is scarcely necessary — for me to speak, as almost all families are already pretty well acquainted with them. It is well known that in the case of cranberries that they cannot be produced only in special favourable locations. Huckleberries are in varieties, and can be made serviceable and good. Dewberries have not been very successful, but the late new one called | Lucretia is very fine and good. Mulberries are also in variety. Downing’s everbearing is one of the oldest and best. The newer one called Russian has a good deal said about it, but though smaller than the other, is in nothing better as we can see. It would be well to plant some of these fruits by way of experimenting, for it is quite possible to learn much by mere experimenting. Some locations are better suited to their needs than | others, and so in what I might fail might be another man’s abundant success. In this way we each of us add something to the general fund of knowledge, one of the prime objects of life, you know. You will say of figs and oranges, that this sounds too much south to be relishable in our snows, but we have tried them, and, in a small measure, have succeeded ; but we must acknowledge that the luxury is hardly worth the expense. The best way to do with these is to have them in large tubs and remove them to frost-proof underground cellars in winter. Hardy nuts may be made profitable in properly planted orchards, but it is only in some sorts that they can be used for family gardening. It is a great pity that some of our fruit and best nuts are forbidden fruit to us by our climate. I believe that the filbert nut may be grown in sheltered and favourable locations, but not to such perfection of size and quality as in England. I would recommend its being tried. The same remarks will apply to the Spanish chestnut, a rich and desirable product when it can be procured. I believe, too, that under very favourable locations and conditions the American hard-shell almond might be profitably produced, and so also with the Japan persim- mon. Why not experiment in these fine nuts? But what I hang my fancy over the most is the American peanut. I do most decidedly think that this serviceable nut. may be grown, if properly considered. And now I think I have exhausted my list and my task is done, how well, you will judge. Not half has been said that might profitably have been said, but I haveaimed at being but merely suggestive, confident in your mature wisdom to fill up anything lacking on my part. Let us hope that our efforts at producing good fruits may be steadily progressing as is our country. F. W. Wi1son.—It gives me great pleasure to have the privilege of being present at this meeting, as I have always taken a very lively interest in the proceedings of the Association ; and felt great satisfaction on learning that the present meeting was to be held in the town to which I belong. Speaking of fruits best adapted to this county, I may say that my experience leads me to the conclusion that, for the basket, the Marl- borough for an early red raspberry, and the Cuthbert for late, are the best, while one not mentioned at all—the Ohio—is the best black. It is hardy, productive, of good colour, and well adapted to our climate ; the bushes are well shaped and stand up well and I think it is in every way the best black raspberry of all. The Souhegan and Gregg are also good. ‘The Ohio is also a good evaporating raspberry, which is likely to be of great advantage in disposing of surplus stock. Of gooseberries, I think the Downing is a long way ahead of any of our well tried varieties. I believe that the Industry, which I Ee ee ee ~ Gitige: ore is = — 17 have been growing, is going to be one of our best. It is a very fine red fruit, and almost mildew proof. In grapes the Champion is the most profitable, but it is almost unfit to eat ; therefore, for home use. and markets we wish to hold, I would prefer Moore’s Early, the Worden and the Concord as the best black grapes, and the Lady and the Niagara as the best white. The Presipent.—Have you any vineyards in Kent! Mr. Witsox.—Very few. In the southern corner of the county, among the islands, they grow very large quantities, some in this county, and some in the adjoining county of Essex. I was never there to see myself, but I believe on the islands there are many hundreds of acres. Plums are almost a failure here; I think the Early Canada is the best, because the hardiest. For cherries I believe in the Early Richmond, which is much the best variety of English cherry, on account of its extreme hardiness and productiveness. Mackenziz Ross.—I believe I am one of the oldest members of the Association in the County of Kent, and may fairly claim the honour of being the father of the Horticul- tural Society in 1877. We are very much indebted to Mr. Smith for sending us two things, the Niagara, and another white grape giving promise of great things, the little Jessica—which is going to take the lead of any other grape. I do not do much in small fruit, but there is a berry—the Shaffer—of which I had a large quantity last year, and realized fifteen cents clear, while others were going for five cents. A. R. Everett.—The Hansell and Cuthbert are the. best red raspberries I have tried. The Mammoth Oluster was prominent for a long while, but it does not stand out now like the Gregg, which is as good as the Ohio. In grapes I have the Delaware. In strawberries I have had success with the Sharpless and Urescent. I have grown the Wilson and the Crescent together, and the Crescent has yielded me almost one-third more—a hundred bushels to the half acre—last year, and the land was not in the best condition either. With cherries I have not had much success ; of gooseberries [ never tried many, but the American varieties seem to be the best. I think the old Duchess is the best white grape I have. I have tried black currants—Lee’s Prolific—and they did first rate. A MemBer.—Did you find the Gregg perfectly hardy here? Mr. Everert.—It has been with me. F. W. Witson.—I have great respect for the opinion of Mr. Everett, who I know to be a highly practical gardener, but I must adhere to what I have said about the Ohio, which, with me, has done very well. When speaking before I omitted to make any mention of strawberries, a fruit for which the soil of this county is particularly well adapted. I have been growing about eighteen kinds, covering an area of about a quarter of an acre, and I gathered from them last year a crop amounting to 192 bushels per acre. The PrestpENT.—Do you give the preference to any particular varieties 4 Mr. Witson.—For bearing I think the Orescent is the best, with the Wilson and Bidwell next, and then, probably, the Manchester. The James Vick I find inclines too much to vines, and does not grow much fruit. It fertilizes well. Mr. Smiru.—Did you ever attempt to grow it away from other varieties } Mr. Wixtson.—No. In fertilizing it is necessary to select varieties which bloom within three days of each other; the Manchester and the James Vick, and the Wilson _ and the Orescent grow best together. The Sharpless I find almost a failure ; it grows the best berry, but scarcely any of them. Peaches do not succeed very well here. The Spanish chestnut, I think, would be a profitable fruit to grow in this section, and the dwarf English walnut, which comes into bearing at about three years of age, and with fruit fully as large as the ordinary English walnut, is a lowheaded tree, and said to be giving great satisfaction in other parts of the country where similar conditions to those prevalent in this county are found.’ ; Mr. BarkweELu.—The Concord is the best grape, but the Lady is good and takes my fancy. The cherry currant succeeds well, and is a fine grower. In black currants I grow chiefly the Black Naples variety. I think, for strawberries, nothing can beat the Wilson and Sharpless. In raspberries the Mammoth Cluster appears to do well enough with me. In cherries I have the English May Duke, but it does not seem to do very well; the blight affects it ; I would like to know what we can do for that. 2 (F.G.) 18 ' Mr. Witson.—My experience is that the only early cherry that will give any satis- faction is the Early Richmond. Mr. BarkweEtt.—In regard to grapes, the Concord is the grape grown by all large growers, but I believe for proiit, after that, the Champion. The PresipENT.—Do you recommend the Champion for home consumption # Mr. Witsoy.—No, the Champion is good for somebody else to eat, but I don’t want. the job; but it is a good grape to make money out of, if you can get somebody else to suck it. Mr. Mackenzie Ross.—I find that the Champion gives more money, because it goes. into the market here two or three weeks earlier than any other variety, selling for fifteen or twenty cents a pound; and I think most of you will go in for what yields the most money. It is not a very luscious fruit, but for a person so constituted that he wants some acid early in the season the Champion is all right. The SecRETARY.—You will observe that the subject of grapes comes up for discussion further on in the programme, under the head of “Grapes for the market.” We are at present discussing fruit for home use—everyone wants to know what to plant in order to secure a supply for their families. Keeping that in view, I would suggest the following list, which will give a family a variety of the different colours of grapes for home use. For black grapes I would suggest Moore’s Early, the Worden and the Concord ; I would leave out the Champion altogether, because Moore’s Early is just as early, and a grape of good quality ; while the Worden just comes between the two, and the Concord can be kept for a long time. For white grapes I would recommend the Niagara and the Empire State. I had the privilege, with Mr. Smith, of testing the Empire State at Rochester, and its quality is excellent, which, for home use, is a most important consideration. I would also add the Pocklington, though I do not think it succeeds very well everywhere, not being as hardy as the Niagara, but at Grimsby we have had good success with it, and some very fine shipments have been made. Among the reds I would suggest the Lindley and the Brighton. There is one criticism I want to make on this paper in regard to the home garden, and that is the idea of fencing in a little square with a high fence, for a home garden. That was the kind of garden I had to begin with—the kind my grandfather had, and which was the prevailing kind in days gone by, when they had more time to work with the spade and hoe, and pull weeds by hand, than we have now. In a garden of this description, into which you cannot get a horse, and in which the fence is in your way, you must do everything with a spade and hoe, and my memories of the past are that it was pretty hard work. I have now torn away all this fence around the garden, so that I can get a horse and a little plough in, and [ plant everything in the garden for home pur- poses in nice long rows, side by side, so that I can cultivate nearly everything with a horse, and do as little digging as possible. Besides this, where you have a fence all around the edge of your garden it is sure to be a mass of weeds, unless you have more time than I have ; and it also harbors insects. Mackenzie Ross.—I propose, Mr. Secretary, that you add to your list of grapes the Jessica, which is one of the most delicious I know of. And then there is the Lady, which cannot be beaten. A Memsrr.—I think the Triomphe de Gande is the sweetest berry we have, and the Orescent and Wilson next. In currants I think the White Grape and Cherry are both good home fruits, but not very profitable. I have not tried Fay’s Prolific. In black- berries I think there is nothing better than the Kittatinny. The dewberry is a nice fruit for the home garden, and should be more looked after than it is; I tried one and found big berries on it. They stand the winter well, and if cultivated would, I think ° : ’ ? yield a large crop. As for the garden itself, I would have a long fence, but fenced in. The Secretary.—You would have it so that a horse could be got in? A Memper.—Yes ; you could work it easier and better, and with more satisfac- tion. I believe in long rows. : Mr. Dempsey.—I will give you my opinion of what the home garden should be, and how and where to select it. I would select, if possible, a site that was long, as has been already suggested, and which might be cultivated with a horse; and I would have it, if at all practicable, thoroughly protected from the wind. The question arises how ita should be done. I would plant firm trellises for all my little apple trees and pear trees. and grapes, running the whole length of the garden, north and south, so that the sun might shine on both sides of them at different times of the day, and then cultivate between these rows. You can grow any variety of fruit on trellises just the same as in any other way, and grow them in any form you like. I assure you a garden planted and kept up in this way is one of the most ornamental spots you could visit, and people will come trom long distances to see it. All you will need to do yourself will be to cultivate the piece of land between the trellises with a horse, and it takes very little time for a ‘man to do that. You will find the ladies will get into the notion of looking after these. trees on the trellises, and do all the pinching and tying necessary. It is good and healthy for them, and they take a great pride in training these plants. As to varieties, I think I heard a man advocating the Champion as a grape to be grown for profit. When I heard that I felt like sticking up the danger flag. I think we should do everything in our power to stamp out any fruit that is unfit to eat, as was said of this grape. (Applause.). But it is not profitable after all, because parties who buy them this year will not buy them next year, at least that is my experience. I have only fifty vines, and I thought at one time there was going to be some money in the fruit, but I find in our little town of Belleville the Champion will not sell for anything, I hardly think people who knew them would carry home a basket if they were given to them. ‘There is only five or six days between them and the Worden, and we can surely wait that long. The Presipent.—What about Moore’s Early ? Mr. Dempsey.—It does not produce enough fruit, it is very shy bearing. There is nothing for an early grape to equal the Worden. There are a great many varieties of grapes, but I would advise any person who wants to plant them to go to their neighbour’s. ground and make their selection while they are ripening. What will ripen in your neigh- bour’s ground is safe enough for you. MackenziE Ross.—Talking about tearing down fences ; of course a man’s property could be protected without fences, but we have fences here. I consider there is something better than that, and that is trees. Some trees we have are not fit for the purpose ; soft maple are the worst trees that can be planted, because they run all over the ground, and their roots are very injurious to other trees. Scotch pine makes a beautiful shade and shelter ; I am fenced from the west, north-west and north by them, and am under the impression that we are very considerably warmer on account of it. Mr. Witson.—I quite agree with Mr. Ross as to the necessity of shelter from the north. I also found that where we had maples we had to put about three times as much fertilizer around as anywhere else. W. E. We.iincton.—I have been listening to the remarks so far made with interest, but I think we have been a little mixed; that is to say, some of us have spoken more in regard to the market than for home purposes. And then, again, we have not been definite enough as to localities, which is a very important element, because what may be recommended for this county or counties where they have about the same climate as here, will not do for places further east. I think it will be necessary for every speaker to define distinctly the locality he resides in, and give us a general idea of the climate. I make this remark because I have been frequently met with the complaint made by subscribers to the Horticultwrist who take the report and are interested in fruit grow- ing, ‘‘ You are not explicit enough as to the climate that certain varieties are adapted to ; while some recommend them as being very successful, others will give a very contrary report ; but we do not know from reading the report what is the cause, whether it is the effect of the soil or climate.” Now, for a home garden in such a climate as you have here—as far as [I understand it—I should recommend in raspberries the Herstine, Cuth- bert, Gregg and Caroline, and last, but not least, Shaffer’s Colossal ; in regard to which I quite agree with Mr. Ross, who, I believe, is the only gentleman who has mentioned it. I thins for home use it is one of the finest varieties that has ever been introduced. As _a market berry it will never become popular, its colour being against it with the masses, but for home use it is unsurpassed. It is very large in size, and has a peculiarly sprightly or acid flavour, which makes it invaluable for canning, This season, after trying all the 20 varieties raised,—because in our own home we use a great deal of canned fruit—I have come to the conclusion that Shaffer’s Colossal surpasses every other variety. The Caroline has not been mentioned. It is a yellow variety, of good quality. This is the first year we have fruited it extensively, though we have had it out for several years in limited quantities. For a shipper I do not recommend it, but for home use it is of good quality vand is rendered very attractive for the table by its beautiful appearance. I am sorry to say that Iam unable to agree with Mr. Wilson as to the Ohio. I am not speaking merely of my own personal experience, but I Snd from my own experience and that of others, that, as a general rule, it isa small berry, and in no way to be compared with the Gregg, which I consider.is ahead of all the black-caps that have ever been introduced, except it may be the Hillborn, which we have not yet tested to any great extent. From what I have heard of the Hillborn, I am inclined to think it may possibly supersede the Gregg on account of hardiness. Samples of it which I have seen were equal in quality to the Gregg, and surpassed it in appearance on account of its bloom and glossiness, I am also told it is hardier. The Gregg is a little on the tender side, but I think in this section, or sections west of Hamilton, that may be classed in the Niagara District, it may be termed perfectly hardy. It succeeds further east,—in Montreal,—but there the snow fall protects it. It also succeeds in the vicinity of Toronto, unless when we have unusually severe winters. In grapes for home culture and the table, I would not want either the Pocklington or Niagara, neither of which are in my opinion a high quality of grape. I would put in my garden Moore’s Early, the Jessica, the Empire State, the Brighton, and a grape that has not been mentioned, Rogers No. 4, which I consider the best of the Rogers’ varieties, being both productive and of good size. I would recommend it both as a home and market berry. Then there is another variety that I would strongly recommend, but only in sections where the Concord will ripen ; the Vergennes, which is a grape of good quality and excellent appearance, and valuable for the home garden. Now, we come to gooseberries. I think most of the speakers this morning have looked at gooseberries from a market point of view solely. Oertainly the Downing and Smith’s Improved are old and reliable varieties, but we have another, the Industry, far surpassing them, and, so far as it has been tested, well adapted to this country, having been tested widely in the United States. At a large horticultural meeting which I attended last June in Washington, it was spoken of as the leading gooseberry, and I am strongly in favour of it, both for home and market uses. Its productiveness is enormous, its quality good, and its size and appearance will always make it valuable. In currants, the Oherry and White Grape have been the leading varieties, but I believe Fay’s Prolific is superior, not only for its productiveness, but for its size and appearance. In quality itis much like Cherry. White Grape is superior to either of them in quality. The best red currant for quality is Moore’s Ruby, a cross of Cherry and White Grape, originated by Jacob Moore, the originator of the Brighton Grape. This is superior in quality, but not quite so large as the Cherry, though more productive than either Fay’s or Cherry, as far as our testing of the last three years has demonstrated. In strawberries for the garden, I value the Manchester very highly. Crescent, I am not fond of, except for the market. I don’t consider it of high quality, and, for the garden, I would prefer berries of a superior quality. T consider Manchester, as I have said, at the head of the list, but in addition would plant the Bidwell and the Sharpless, and also the Wilson, than which, when fully ripened, there are few better berries. Mr. Brat (of Lindsay).—You spoke of the Caroline raspberry ; how does that com- pare with Brinckle’s Mr. Wetuineron.—I do not think it is fully up to Brinckle’s Orange in quality, but that is a different question in most sections. I intended to have spoken of the new Golden Queen. We have not tested it sufficiently yet to speak positively, but from reports I think it is a berry destined to be largely sought after. It is said to be a seed- ling of the Cuthbert, —at least it was found in a plantation of Cuthbert and has the same appearance,—and, what is very desirable, it has good shipping qualities. I would not recommend anyone to plant largely of it until further tested for a year or two, but at the same time I am satisfied they would be safe in trying it in small quantities. From what T have learned of it I believe it is going to be a very desirable variety, and in its colour 21 will be quite the equaleof the celebrated Cuthbert, which I regard as the best red rasp~ berry for general use that has ever been introduced. Mr. Witson.—Different people have different experiences, and that has a good deal to do with their opinions. I have not at all withdrawn my idea that the Ohio is the best black raspberry. The Mammoth Cluster is dwindling out, and the Gregg, though a good berry, is not nearly as good in colour as the Ohio. As for the Caroline, which I have been observing for several years, although it is hardy and a heavy cropper, it will not keep, and if you cannot take the berries just when they are ripe, they are gone. Mr. Wetuineton.—They are not shippers. I spoke of them only for home use. Dr. McCutty.—tThe berry that did best with us last winter was an old-fashioned one, not much spoken of now—the Mammoth Cluster. It was a dry season, and its flavour was superior, though it was not so large as some other berries. A gentleman who lives. near me had the Gregg and other improved berries, and it was freely admitted that the dry weather affected mine less than the others. We were thinking that we would have had to take a back seat with our old Mammoth Cluster, but we did not have to do it, for, taken all in all, it held its own with any other berries we had on the lake shore. In regard to strawberries, I was glad to hear another old kind spoken of, the Wilson, for I believe it is the best market berry we have in this section of the country. The Triomphe de Gand I have not heard mentioned this morning, but it certainly has not lost its name with us yet, and I understand from gentlemen who grow it in our section that they get a cent a quart more for it in this market than any other variety, and sometimes sell all they have before there is a market for the others at all, which is a very great triumph, indeed, I think. The Prestpent.—Leaving aside the market, what do you consider the best for home use ? Dr. McCutty.—TI like the flavour of the Triomphe better than that of any other berry I have ever had, though, of course, it is not an early berry. There are some new varieties—the Sharpless, for instance —which are very nice, but I doubt if they are equal to the Triomphe, though growing larger; I don’t think the taste is superior to the Triomphe, though the berries are very fine. I have not had much to do with berries. except for my own use, and the old Mammoth Cluster did so well last year that I have. thought perhaps I could not get anything better. The PresipENt—Do you grow currants } Dr. McCuLty.—No; we grow a great many other things, and currants require so much care that we have given them up. We grow a great many cherries, which take the lead of almost everything. We grow just the common Kentish cherry ; they are very fine. I have one kind that comes in later than the rest, which I have not been able to find anywhere else ; I do not know its name, but it is a very red cherry, growing in clusters, sour in taste, but pleasant in flavor. It is a good bearer, bearing every year ; and if I knew its name I should be inclined to have a good many more. The PresIDENT.— Do you grow any grapes ? Dr. McCutty.—I do not, but my neighbours grow the Concord largely. Of course there are other grapes grown, but it seems to take the lead. We have not fruited the Pocklington or Niagara yet. They are high in price, and we thought we were doing more for the nurseries than ourselves in buying them, and did not go in for them. A. M. Smira—tThere is a raspberry which has not been mentioned, I think, which is valuable not only for home use, but for the market, on account of its earliness and good qualities. I refer to the Souhegan, which comes in ten days befor you get the Gregg and some other varieties. In regard to the Caroline raspberry, I must beg leave to differ a little from Mr. Wellington. It certainly is a hardy, productive and fine-looking berry, but, as far as my judgment goes, most insipid in taste; the most insipid in the whole collection. President Lyon, of the Michigan State Horticultural Society, was invited to address the meeting, and did so in the following terms: I am a little out of my own territory this morning, but I have discovered that a little difference in the geographical or political situation of my state and this province does not make much difference in the people. Although we are supposed to be talking exclusively 22 about fruit for the family, we find it almost impossible to forget altogether the “almighty dollar,” which is, of course, a very important consideration, and cannot be kept entirely out of sight, even in the discussion of what to grow for home use. I observe this par- ticularly in strawberries, which is naturally the first fruit we talk about, being generally the rst we eat. Some years ago, not very far from here, I received four varieties from Mr. Arnold. I have not heard it mentioned it here to-day, and yet with me, after seven ‘or eight years’ experience, one of these, the Alpha, is preferable for an early strawberry. It is of good quality and fair size, and ripens early. There are two or three others a little earlier, but they are unproductive, and, even for family use, we must have something fairly productive. [ hear a number of varieties of other fruit spoken of, and am rather ‘surprised at hearing some of them recommended for the home garden, particularly the _ Gregg raspberry, which, to my apprehension, is one of the poorest berries of its class. ‘grown, as far as quality is concerned. It is productive, and you get money for it in the market because it is large. If you were to hand out half a dozen apples to a child he would pick the biggest one, even though it was good for nothing, and it is the same way in the market ; and we have to remember that fact when talking about berries and other fruit for our own use. We would hardly think, in our state, of growing the Gregg for home use. It is a late berry, coming along a little later even than the Mammoth Cluster, which is far better in quality. The Souhegan and the Tyler seem to be so nearly identical as to be practically the same. I would add one or the other of them for family use, though they are not, perhaps, so profitable. I think a good deal of the Caroline and Brinckle’s Orauge for home use. It is perhaps true, as has already been said, that Brinckle’s Orange is nearly out of the question by reason of its unproductiveness and want of hardiness, but as to the Shaffer—we always drop off the extra handle and call Shatfer’s Colossal the Shaffer—it is one of the most vigorous and productive we have, and of good size. I call it a good market berry. The market will require a little talking up before people will accept it, but when once it is known in the market it commands a good price, and is probably as profitable as anything we have. I certainly consider it very de- sirable for the home, because it is productive, large, and of good quality. There has been a fruit mentioned here, which, it seems to me, will bear more consideration than it has received, though it is comparatively new—thedewberry. There are a number of varieties which are comparatively unproductive and undesirable, but within the last six or eight years we have taken up the Lucretia, which for the past five or six years has borne very fine crops. It possesses the merit of coming in at a time when thers are no blackberries in the market, and on that account seems to me to be very desirable. It is a difficult berry to handle, but for our own use we find it good. I have not heard many cherries mentioned. The Montmorency is somewhat superior in size, and fully equal, it seems to me, to the Early Richmond and the Kentish, and I know no reason why it should not in part take their place. It ripens a little later than the Early Richmond, but is very similar in most respects. In regard to grapes, I will venture to ask the question, why the Lady was not introduced into the family list ? It is comparatively unproductive, but it seems to me to do better as it gets older; and being a child of the Concord, possesses the hardiness, though not the vigour of that variety; and when you come to the particular taste required for the family, the fruit, it seems to me, is head and shoulders above every- thing else. It is earlier than Moore’s Early with us, or any other satisfactory variety that has been well tested, and I think should occupy a very prominent place in the list for the home garden, where you do not want so much quantity as a suitable quality. We are yearly thinking more and more of the Brighton in our state; it is being shown extensively ‘at our fairs, and is very highly esteemed, as well for its quality as its productiveness. I know it has been claimed that it is a little liable to mildew, but [ do not think the difficulty ‘in that respect is a serious one, and it seems to me worthy of a prominent position. The Worden, within the last two or three years, has taken a more prominent place with us than formerly, on account of its being earlier than the Concord, and at the same time equally hardy and productive. I think it stands quite well with us. I do not like to speak of quality when discussing the Concord, for I don’t think it is quite so high as some of the gentlemen have placed it. I think more of quality than I do of quantity when you ‘come to the home garden. I was a little surprised when [ heard the Empire State men- ‘tioned ; I would fike to know if it has been really tested in this province at all. It has not been with us, so far as I have learned. We have heard a great deal of it, but have not tried it far enough to recommend it for any purpose. Mr. We.tuinaton.—We have fruited it for two years. President Lyon.—It takes a number of years fruiting to settle the qualities of any new variety. I notice in gooseberries that the Industry is coming intofavour. There is -one thing, however, which I notice in almost every foreign variety—They succeed for a few years with reasonable treatment in good soil, while, unless they have special care, they soon after fall under the influence of mildew. It is only by special treatment from persons who know how to handle them we can permanently succeed. A. M. Smirxa.—I will supplement the remarks of the last speaker in regard to the Industry, by saying that a year ago last spring I raised some plants, and a couple of them which were planted in a corner were almost forgotten, and consequently neglected. When I came to investigate these plants last summer I found a few berries on them, and they were badly mildewed. ON SMALL FRUITS. A paper on this subject by P. E. Bucke, of Ottawa, was then read, as follows: Whilst the warmer portions of our climate is devoted to the growth of a general fruit dist, in the colder portions of the Dominion an intensified attention should be given to those fruits which can only be raised with a fair amount of success. The principal hope of the horticulturist in the clear and bracing air of the lovely valley of the noble Ottawa, as far as twenty years of practical experience has taught me, is still centered in the small fruits, including grapes. It seems strange to me that so many look ujon this berry busi- ness with contempt, whilst others treat it with indifference, and the rest of mankind with neglect. Where people can and do cultivate the larger fruits successfully, the three rural states above referred to may be pardoned, but where no others can be extracted from the generous soil, the free air and the azure sky, owing to climatic influences, it seems a shame when the breast of mother earth gives us the opportunity of sucking the sweets of these delicious and promptly responding fruits, that they should be so slighted, neglected, or forgotten. There are no fruits which give so long a period of freshness, or which supply the gap at that season when this article of diet is so much required by the human system, June, July, August, September and October are the seasons of the strawberry, the rasp- berry, the gooseberry, the currant and the grape, and it is during these months we have what is called the “heated term,” when fresh fruit is so acceptable. Every farmer, every gardener, every man who has a city lot, every man who has a thousand acres, every man who has a brick-yard or a saw-mill, should also have his small fruit patch. We all know hhow much facilities have increased for shipments, how much they have been improved by the various means of handling, by the diversity of packages suitable for the various classes of fruits ; but no one will for a moment contend, that knows the difference, that fruits shipped at all are to be compared for a single instant, either for brightness of colour or purity of aroma, to those which are gathered and placed on the table by the same delicate hand. I think I hear some of the shippers in the audience say, ‘My dear Bucke, you are talking nonsense ;” but I know,. and I say in these election times, without fear of ‘successful contradiction, that by far the largest majority will say I am right when I give my vote for fresh-picked fruit for immediate table use. And I further say, there is not an inch of inhabited territory in Canada to-day, except some original character has placed his mansion on some high and lofty boulder, that cannot be made to produce four or five months’ fresh fruit for the season when it is most required, and with proper canning it can be made to last the family throughout the year. What then shall we plant? First, some well-tried varieties of strawberries, such as Wilson’s, Manchester, or Crescent, Second, raspberries—Franconia for early, Cuthbert for a good cropper and later berry; and if you want more raspberries, plant more Cuthberts. Shall we plant currants? Yes; Fay’s Prolific. This variety gives longer bunches, which makes it more easily picked, and the berries, with high cultivation, are very fine. Shall we plant white currants? Yes; 24 a few bushes of White Grape, just to eat fresh. They look like pearls amongst the cream and sugar setting; when thoroughly ripe are juicy and sweet, but the colour does not suit the tidy housewife for canning or jelly, so we will only have a few bushes for fresh fruit. Shall we have black currants?! Yes; we will have Lee’s. Not that it is so prolific that. it has been cracked up to be, but it is sweeter and has a nicer flavour than the old Naples. There is nothing better for a first class roly-poly pudding. What shall we have next? We will have some gooseberries. Whatsorts! Well, Smith’s and Downing—the latter to plant in the shade of trees or fence, as they do not endure the sun so well, and further, when they are to be had, the Oonn and Ottawa. Well, Professor, what next ? Why, some grapes, of course. What are the most successful cultivated at Ottawa? In favoured localities almost any variety may be grown with a fair amount of success, but for general culture we will recommend a few Champions; they are not by any means a first-class berry, but they are sure to ripen, and make an excellent wine. Do you recommend the use of wine? Yes, “home made ;” but not sherry or any imported, doctored stuff. Then we will plant Moore’s Early, Rogers’ 9, 14 and 15, also some Brightons. What about the Niagara and Pocklington? Both good grapes, but too late for the north. How sweet are the cornfields that spring from the earth, Mauch sweeter the flowers that grow from hid roots ; Of all the rich blessing that follow us north, The best is the fairy-like, healthy small fruits. The meeting then adjourned at 12.30 until 2 p, m. On resuming in the afternoon a Committee on fruits was appointed, consisting of Messrs A. M. Smith, F. W. Wilson, and W. E. Wellington. QUESTION DRAWER. The Question Drawer was then opened, and the following questions read and answers. given. KNOTTINESS IN PEARS. Question.—Is there any well ascertained cause or remedy for knottiness in the fruit of the pear 4 Mr. Dempsey.—I can only answer that question by saying I do not know. There are varieties which are all knot. We imported several varieties some years ago, which were said to be very fine in Europe, and there is nothing but knots in them now, and they are unfit to eat. I made some experiments last year upon an apple and pear tree, and may say I was successful in a small way, but I cannot at present give any certain remedy. THE ONTARIO APPLE. Qurstion.—Is the Ontario Apple attracting attention, and is it a profitable fruit for shipment to Britain 4 The Presipent.—The Ontario, as far as export is concerned, is a new apple. Not very many were exported this year, but | sold fair quantities of it sent from different shippers at prices ranging from seventeen shillings to twenty-two shillings per barrel. It is an apple that does not spot, and in the future will command a high price in the British market ; where, as far as it is known, it is well thought of now. I am confident that in the future it is going to be a valuable apple, as it has points in its favour as between the Wagener and the Northern Spy, which make it valuable. Shippers sending it have lost little or nothing in the shipping, as it carried well; and I consider that the prices it brought, for a new variety going into the market, were extra good. 25 MULCHING. Question.—Do you approve of mulching strawberries, raspberries, currants, goose- berries and blackberries with sawdust ; if not what with, and when ? A. M. Smira.—It all depends upon what kind of sawdust. I do not think pine sawdust is a very good article for mulching. If you get hardwood in a decayed state it is a very good thing for raspberries or anything of that kind. My habit of mulching straw- berries is generally to cover them with a good coat of straw in the fall of the year and to rake it between the rows. Sometimes I have run it through the straw cutter, and scattered it under the leaves atter the first weeding, before the ripening of the fruit. The Prestpent.—Would you use straw also in the raspberries ? Mr. Suira,—Well, if you can get it, you can use to advantage decayed sawdust and chip manure. I have had access to the yard of the Great Western Railway, where they have stored and sawed large quantities of wood, and the sawdust and bark and chips have been allowed to remain and decay. I find that a very good mulch for raspberries. Mr. Witson.—I do not mulch raspberries in winter, but strawberries planted near them. I manure up around the strawberries in the fall, and then, in the spring, bring it right off into the raspberries. The raspberries seem to need it much more in the summer, and the strawberries in winter. Mr. Evererrs.—The reason I put that question in the box was because I mulched my strawberries with soft wood chiefly—elm, oak and bass ;—and they did first rate. Mr. Lyon.—I think it is very desirable to mulch strawberries late in the Fall, for the purpose of protecting them and bringing them through the winter in good condition. I am not an advocate of mulching anything during the growing season. I regard that. kind of mulching as simply an excuse for neglecting and not cultivating them, and I believe cultivating will do more than mulching in the way of inducing growth. As to raspberries and blackberries I do not know that I would mulch them at all; I would rather use the cultivator; I do not know that any good effect is to be derived by mulching them in winter. It may be different in this climate, but in mine I would not. do it at all, RASPBERRY CULTURE, QueEstion.— What causes Blackcap berries to fruit on the tops of new canes ! A. M. Smrru.—It seems to be the early growth that generally fruits in the fall ; some varieties are more inclined to do that than others. The Secrerary.—I suppose the bushes made a mistake, and thought it was next year. A Memper.—There are certain varieties of Blackcaps that invariably produce a second crop from the canes grown that season, and I suspect that the tendency is so nearly general that when a peculiar season comes round it produces the same effect upon others that do not usually do it. The Secretrary.—lI think it is entirely owing to the nature of the season. If there is an early growth and a rest that can be compared with the winter’s rest, and later in the season such climatic influences as would induce their development, it would be like another season, and thus tend to produce fruit. Mr Wi.son.— While the raspberry is being discussed it might not be out of place to ask what is the prospect of the new raspberry that has been so much talked about and advertised, and which bears two or three times in the summer—the Earhart. Mr. Wetiinetoxn.—I know nothing definite about it ; only what I have read in the Rural New Yorker and some other papers. The Rural speaks rather favourably of it ; they have fruited it, and think it is worthy of propagation. LOW HEADED TREES. Question.—Which are the best for large fruit, low headed trees or high, taking cultivation and picking into consideration 1 The Secretary.—I have had some experience in regard to this question. For the sake of picking and so on—a lazy idea, I suppose—I left a good many trees with low 26 heads. My experience has proved to me that it was a yreat wistake, for I have been pruning them up higher and higher ever since. [find them most inconvenient ; I do not approve of low headed trees for cultivation, eertainly. The PresipeNT.—Did you find any difference in the fruit of the low headed tree and the high ? The Secretary.—l have not found any advantage. Mr. WetLiInaton.—I cannot agree with the Seeretary in that. I believe that the best and proper way is to grow trees low headed. In the first place the stem of a high headed tree is exposed to the sun, especially early in the season, and to the action of the wind in Autumn, which I believe has a very injurious effect on its life and health generally. A low headed tree is its own shade to its stem. As far as cultivation is con- cerned it is true that it is easier with a high headed tree, but I would take my chances on the low headed one, and use hand cultivation where I could not get the cultivator in. The PrestpENT.—What would you designate a high or low headed tree ? Mr. WetLineron.—Ycu will tind them all the way from seven to ten feet in some orchards. ‘They are all heights, but in taking them from the nursery I consider a tree headed at five feet is the right thing, and you can prune them a trifle higher than that as they grow, and as you make the shape of your tree. The Secrerary.—Mr. Wellington and I do not differ so very greatly ; I would con- sider that a rather high headed tree. I think we should have mentioned what trees were referred to, whether apples, pears, peaches or other trees. I have been in the habit lately of heading pear trees as low as possible; they grow in a very upright way, and therefore you can get near them even though the branches are very near the ground. I have found it of great advantage to allow the branches of pear trees to grow low, because very often they are troubled with the blight, as you all know, and in that case by cutting off the tops _ of the trees you will have a good tree left. Mr. We.tuiINcTon.—That applies with even greater force to the peach tree. I believe I can extend the lite of a peach tree one third or a half by growing it as a low headed tree, and also produce better fruit than on a tall scraggy tree, such as is commonly seen in peach orchards. Mr. Perrit.—t1 quite agree with that. The tree will grow better, and you will get a better class of fruit. Mr We urneton.—I have trees branching as low as four feet, and even three, and I find everything in favour of the tow headed tree. Take it in the spring of the year, when the sun is bearing strong on the trunk of the tree, and there is a long stem exposed to it, a sharp frost afterwards bursts the bark, and I have not found the same effeet in low headed trees. Professor Panron.—I should say a peach tree should have a trunk of about a foot and a half, and an apple tree between four and five feet. Dr. McCutty.—On the Lake Shore we had them so low that we could not cultivate them, but that plan was given up after a number of years, and I only know of one large orchard with trees growing in that way now. We have come to the conclusion that under the present circumstances we can get a great deal more fruit by having the trees trimmed up higher, and the rule now is to trim them up so a horse can pass under the trees with- out the harness and hames carrying off the bark. With a peach tree it is different; my own experience is altogether in favour of the low-headed tree. When frosts were severe on young trees, if I had low buds near the ground, the trees would start and grow after the tops were killed; I saved the tree by having the branches low. I am in favour of heading them low for the first. few years until the wood becomes firm. I think it is the better plan when trees are young to branch them low. Apples, I am in favour of trim- ming high. The Presipent.—What length of trunk do you call high ? Dr. McCutty.—So that a man’s horse can work freely under thé tree. The Presipent.—You don’t require to run the horse very closely ; would five feet be high enough ? Dr. McCut.ty.—No ; it would require six feet to allow the animal to pass freely under the tree. Mr. Everergs.—I differ from you entirely. I have seen more trees blighted by _ ‘being long and leaned over with the wind than in any other way. There may be a little more hand work in having them low, but it is the best. Mr. Dempsey.—There are several advantages derived from having trees low headed- In the first place, we look upon the tree as a lever and the surface of the soil as the ful- crum, and when the tree becomes a full foliaged one, the stress will come very much more on the roots in a high-headed than in a low-headed tree. I have planted low and high-headed trees at the same time, and, although the low ones would be much smaller, perhaps two or three years younger than the others, I have invariably found that they doubled the high ones in growth. This is a very great advantage, I assure you, in the low-headed over the high-headed tree. I prefer a tree about fcur or five feet high, and for cultivation, a good cultivator that can be swung under the tree. Then use the hoe freely ; it does not hurt us to hoe a little bit. I do not think it is wise to plough too close to the trunk of a tree, because a certain quantity of the roots would be destroyed that way. F. W. Witson.—If cherry trees are very low it is difficult to gather the fruit. Cherry trees should have a stem about four feet high, and apple trees between five and six feet. There seems to exist here some difference of opinion as to what a high or low- headed tree is, Mr. Wellington thinks five feet is a low-headed tree, while others believe it is pretty high. I think it should be about five or six feet. If it is less it runs on the ground, or at all events, so close as to spoil the fruit. Mackenzie Ross.—I have an orchard that was planted in 1873, mostly Greenings and Ribston Pippins. I have some Ribston Pippins as pretty as ever you gazed upon, and I cultivate them every year. One year I’ plant it with potatoes, and the next year with corn. I contend that we get the best fruit from low trees. In the first place a storm kas less effect on a low tree than on a high one, and then you can gather the fruit much easier. We see many fine articles in the papers about people losing their fruit trees when they are young, and what is the reason of it? It is simply because they do not clean them up. Some of our fruit growers should be ashamed to see their orchards, with brush piled up almost as high as the tops of the trees, harbouring rats and mice and other vermin. If you keep your trees clean, and before the winter sets in hill them upa little bit with good earth, mice will never destroy them. The Presipent.—I think you are right. What would you consider a low-headed tree ? Mackeyzige Ross.—Beginning from three feet. When you have a one-horse plough you can squeeze it in very close to the roots; then if the boys come along with a hoe they ean clean that out ; then go back with the hoe and pack earth in, adding a pitchfork or two of light manure on the top, which retains the moisture and prevents the sun from penetrating into the roots. That is my mode of culture, and I prefer a low tree. BLIGHT IN PEAR TREES. Question.—To what cause may blight in pear trees be attributed, and what is the best mode of treatment ? Mr. Dempsey.—Kither cut the blight away or cut the tree down, and get it out of the way a3 fast as possible. The PresipeNtT.—That is the universal experience with blight ; the knife is the only remedy. Mr. Everetts.—lIs it necessary to destroy the tree altogether ? The Prestpent.—The moment you observe the blight, cut down below it. You will find sometimes that you will have to cut pretty close to the roots to get below the blight. Dr. McCutty.—In 1872 I bought forty pear trees. I did not come into direct pos- session of them, but had the privilege of attending the trees. I hired a man from the 28 village, and we got some of the best, fine rotten manure we could find to put around the trees. After doing this with part of them we left, and did not go back. As far as we went with the manure those trees all had the blight, and where we had stopped, the blight stopped. This led me to the conclusion that the manure was one of the causes, and I have never put any manure to any of my pear trees since, and I have been very little troubled with blight. Whenever I see any indications of blight now I immediately use the knife, and put the wood in the cooking stove. One of my neighbours had a nice little orchard close to his barn, where the ground was saturated. He lost all his trees ; they died off one or two at a time, till now he has only one tree. I had some very fine pears at the time, and he came over to me and wanted to know how it was that he could not grow pears as I could. I told him what my former experience had been, and that probably the close vicinity of his orchard to the barn was what caused the blight. Mr. Ripter.—I had four pear trees, two of which were very large. They stood two and two together at about a hundred yards apart, and when I first got the place two of them were bearing very heavily. There was then a heavy sod around them. After a while I thought that in order to make them bear better I would let the hogs go in and root aroundthem. The very next spring after I did that the blight took them, and destroyed both of the trees. I believe if I had left the sod growing strong my pears. would have lived longer. Dr. McCutty.—I work my pears nearly every year with a plough, and I do not find that cultivating the soil has any ill effect on pears. They get no manure. The SecretTary.—I think the cause for blight now assigned by scientists is bacteria —a very minute form of life, whether animal or vegetable is scarcely known, which is hardly to be detected by the most powerful glass ; and to which, also, are attributed many of the diseases of the human system. Scientists profess to have discovered that in all cases of blighted limbs these minute organisms are present, and they are assigned as the cause of the blight. If that is true it is possible that what has been stated by members here to-day is also true—that when pear trees are manured very heavily with barn yard manure, a very soft, succulent growth is induced, which would be more subject to the entry of these germs or minute forms of life, and therefore it might be explained in that way. i Professor Panton.—I might say that I have here a diagram, showing the bacteria to which the Secretary has referred. Pear blight, like all similar troubles, has raised much discussion and many theories as to its cause. In the earlier stages of the discussion it was attributed to certain conditions of the weather, and then the theory was advanced that it was caused by aninsect. That insect does sometimes bring about something of the nature of pear blight, but still that is not now considered to be the cause. Then came the frozen sap theory—that the alternate frost and fine weather brought about in the sap conditions of a more or less poisonous nature. Then there was the fungus theory, whick I think Prof. Mills upholds, but of which, I think, no specific description has been given. The latest researches—and they seem to have been pretty accurate, and carried on with great care—trace its origin to the presence of these bacteria—exceedingly small organ- isms. Wherever trees are blighted these are found in the sap, and healthy branches inoculated with that sap become blighted. When the same sap was strained, and these organisms eliminated, the inoculation was not productive of blight, but wherever these bacteria are found in it it produces blight. It is not the same as the bacteria that bring about rottenness, because these minute organisms in the juice of growing pears will multiply at a great rate, which the ordinary bacteria off decay will not do, their proper condition being in decaying matter, or matter which is about todecay. The experiments have been carried on with great care, and now they have got to the source of the trouble the difficulty presenting itself is as to what is the remedy. So far the best results have been obtained from trying to work on the condition of the tree. There are three things _ which have to be considered in regard to all these fungi—the atmosphere at the outset. That is something almost beyond our control, but certain conditions of the atmosphere are very favourable to fungous growth. Then there is the tree or plant affected—to watch its growth and vigour, and then, again, there is the growth of the fungus itself. 29 So far nothing seems to have been discovered that will work upon the fungus, but they are working on tiie vigour of the tree. The tree needs to be grown vigorously, but not luxuriantly, since the latter condition, as the Secretary has said, is the one in which they would be more subject to the entry of these microscopic organisms. In the case which has been mentioned, where so much manure was used, a condition of extreme succulence was induced which was favourable to the entry of this small organism. The whole thing, at present, seems to consist in bringing about a healthy, vigorous, but not too luxuriant growth. A specific cure to kill the thing itself has not yet been obtained. What has been mentioned is best—the knife. In cutting it is necessary to cut quite a piece below the blight ;—to prevent the disease you must go down till you come upon the green, natural sap. If there is the least bit of the sap left that is discoloured the tree will go on and die ; you must cut the green, healthy wood below. THE BEST MARKET PEACHES. QuEsTIoN.— Which are the six best varieties of market peaches; three early and three medium to late ? The SzoreTARY-—We have a good deal of experience down at Grimsby most years, but last year—I might say for the last three or four years—we have not had much opportunity of testing any variety. From my own experience of those I have tested I consider the following ones very reliable and satisfactory, although there are other sorts which [ am growing but have not yet fruited. For the three early ones I would recom- mend the Alexander, Hale’s Early, and the Early Crawford. The latter is certainly the best early peach, as far as quality is concerned, but it is not so hardy as the others; we frequently get a crop of Alexander or Hale’s Early when we do not of the Early Craw- ford. The others are also earlier ; indeed the three come in succession, the Alexander first, then Hale’s Early, and after that the Early Crawford. For medium to late I would recommend the following three varieties :—the Old Mixon which immediately succeeds the Orawford, the Smock, a late peach which when it matures—and it does most years— is very fine, and the Lemon Cling, which, if you do not have too many, is a very good market peach. Mr. Pertir.—I cannot add anything to Mr. Woolverton’s list. I think for six peaches you could not go astray on those he has mentioned. A. M. Smira.—lIt is so long since I have grown any peaches that I am hardly in a position to say much, but if I were confined to six varieties I think I would prefer the Rivers to Hale’s Early, which I do not consider a reliable peach. A MemBer.—What about the Early Barnard ? The Secretary.—I have grown it in years gone by. It is a very excellent peach as a rule, if the tree is not neglected. It is a very fine yellow peach, but not equal to the Crawford, and for that reason I discarded it. In regard to the Early Rivers, it is rather delicate, and shows bruises very easily, which is the principal objection. Dr. McCutty.—You have not mentioned the late Crawford. The SrcreTaRy.—It does not bear very well. A Memper.—What do you think about Hale’s July ? The Secretary.—l have not fruited it. The Memper.—It will bear earlier, keep longer, and is a better producer and shipper than any other grown. They produce more or less every year. This year they were a full crop. Another MemBer.—What about the Foster. The SecreTary.—lIt is very good. It comes in withthe Early Crawford nearly. I do not think it is superior to the Early Crawford. Mr. Witson.—The Early Canada appears to be hardy, and I think the Foster here is a better peach than the Crawford. 3 30 THE APPLE IN KENT. The following paper was read by Mr. F. W. Wilson: The first apples raised in America were on Governor’s Island, in Boston harbour, in 1639. In Kent we have the standard of excellence for their culture. We have the soil, climate, lake protection and shipping facilities to make it the fruit garden of the world, and we are making great strides toward that end. Every man, woman and child in Kent should be thankful to our government for having our interests so well represented in the metropolis by the amg and efforts of our ex-president, Prof. Saunders, and his assistant vice-president, P. C. Dempsey, our present president, A. McD. Allan ‘and others. The people of Kent were certainly too careless of their display at this great Colonial and Indian exhibition. Though there have been no prizes given for fruits sent: the best collection from Kent were from Mr. Ross, containing, according to our best and latest government reports, only thirty-five varieties of apples, two of pears, one of peppers; while Mr. P. C. Dempsey alone showed sixty varieties of apples, twenty-four of pears, twenty-eight of grapes, two of currants, six of gooseberries, one of plums and one of cranberries—122 varieties in all. Orchards of good winter varieties of apples produce an annual average crop, at low estimate of first and second class fruit, of the value of $100 per acre. And the pig feed and pasture in orchard would pay for all the work at trees and fruit. The hogs do much benefit by destroying the codling moth and other insects. If the cultivator evaporates his own fruit he gets much more than that from it all. I believe that the most profitable varieties of apples in this locality are, in order of merit, the Baldwin, Ben Davis, R. I. Greening, Golden Russet, Northern Spy and Pheenix. They are much better than any of the new Russian and ironclad apple trees, which are used in the northern parts of the country where these better varieties will not succeed. It does not require an ironclad apple tree to stand the climate here. One of the greatest mistakes made in our climate is we do not pick our apples soon enough. With the list mentioned we can start in the latter part of September with Greenings and Ben Davis, and finish with Baldwins, Golden Russets and Northern Spy about the middle of October. They should be handled very carefully and tastefully, having light stepladders, and wire hooks for hanging the baskets on either the limbs or the ladder. Begin by gathering the fruit off the outside of the tree before climbing into it ; youare not liable to shake so many down this way. Instead of pulling the apples off with a jerx and breaking off the bud along with the apple, so that you will not have fruit for the next year or two, turn the apple up and it breaks of quite readily, and you can do it rapidly. Put the apples gently into the basket and pour them into piles very carefully and cleanly. Use only very neat, clean barrels, and keep the different varieties and qualities separate. Don’t put in any very inferior stock. Shake down frequently and press closely into barrel, placing the layers near each end with the stems toward the end. - After the barrels are nailed tightly and honestly stenciled, keep them on their side in preference to standing on end. It is generally most profitable to sell early, so that the fruit can be placed on the foreign markets before the, arrival of apples from the more northern localities, and before the flood of oranges from Spain. The British people prefer a bright red colour, while Americans are suited with Greenings and even Bellflowers. There are now over 7,000 acres of apple orchard in Kent county, and its export in 1886 was about 50,000 barrels of first-class apples and 15,000 bushels of bulk fruit for evaporation in York state, besides a large amount for plenteous home consumption for a population of over 50,000 in Kent, and a large amount of cider, vinegar, waste and pig feed. Wherever people are there is a demand for fruit. It is the most beautiful and valuable food in the world. Dr. Tanner’s first food after forty days’ fast was fruit. Fruit was the first, original and natural food of man. Many live on it only. It is a luxury, _ necessity, appetizer, stimulant, nerve tonic, food and medicine all in one. The best temperature in which to keep this flower of commodities is as near freezing point as possible without actual freezing In this way they will keep all year round. ‘Cleanliness is next to godliness” as well in the fruit garden as with ourselves. 31 We should be careful to have clean fences, to keep out all brush, weeds, ete., and wash the trees in early part of June with a solution made as follows: ‘™ Mix as much baking soda into water as it will dissolve, and then mix with soft soap to the consistency of or- dinary house paint, and opply with a brush.” It will make them shine with health and vigor, and destroy bark lice and keep away borers. The best preventative for apple spot and codling moths is to spray the trees when the blossoms are falling, and again a week later with a solution of three ounces of Paris green and three pounds of hy pophosphites of soda to each thirty-gallon barrel of water, throwing the spray so it falls on the upper side of the leaves. [ consider fruit culture to be the finest occupation in the world. I must have been born a fruit grower, for when a boy I was almost always to be found among the fruits, so I can heartily say, as did Robbie Burns, “ Be aye stickin’ in a tree, Jock, it’ll aye be ? 9) growin’ when ye’r sleepin’. ARE APPLE ORCHARDS PROFITABLE? This question was taken up in connection with that of fruit culture in the County of Kent, and elicited the following discussion : The Secretary.—Are apple orchards profitable? If I am to answer that question in accordance with my experience of the last three years, I say most emphatically, no ; they are not. They have been profitable, but for the last three years I do not think our orchards have averaged a bushel a tree in the yield, and they have been decidedly un- profitable. I have a neighbour in Grimsby who has an orchard of six hundred large trees, which have been twenty-five years planted. I speak of him particularly, because he hag Baldwins. In all that time there have been three or four good crops, which paid well, and had such a yield been continued every alternate year, the orchard would have been very profitable; but the owner of that orchard is now feeling thoroughly disgusted with apple culture, and inclined to sell out and get away somewbere. I remember the time in our own orchard when there was never a failure like this at all. We have taken in one year from one Greening apple tree twenty barrels of apples. This, perhaps, would seem a little astonishing, but it is an enormous tree, and, I suppose, about seventy-five years of age. Now, as to what is the cause of the present barrenness in our orchards in that section # There have been a good many different theories. I was over at the Rochester meeting a few weeks ago, and the same complaint was general in the state of New York. All the reports coming in were to the effect that they had never been so unfortunate before, and every kind of theory was suggested as to the cause. One man thought it was due to an electric storm at a certain season, another that it was attributable to a lack of manure. a third that want of cultivation was the cause, and so on. Most of the speakers agreed in attributing the failure, during the last season particularly, to the apple aphis, which had been very abundant. I do not know if the people of Kent were troubled in that way, but we in Grimsby suffered with it just in the same way. When the apples were small, just about the size of a hickory nut, the trees were full of these little green aphides. It was held by some that these little insects sucked the juices of the leaves and stems, and thus caused the leaves and apples to fall off. I noticed a paper that was read the other day at the meeting of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society, in which, speaking of the degeneracy of orchards, the reader held that they were running out ; that many of the varieties we have cultured so long, the Spitzenberg, for instance, were run out. I do not know, how- ever, that that isa settled question. We can only theorize, of course, and I have been inclined to attribute the failure to a disease we do not understand fully, that has affected them with these minute fungi, whose dreadfully destructive powers we are only just beginning to appreciate. . I think, perhaps, they have something to do with it. The leaves and fruit have both been found to be affected by them, and it is quite possible that the trouble is due to causes so small that we, who are in the business of cultivating fruit trees, are not able to quite understand them. Iam in hopes, however, that our scientific friends, who are making a study of these things at the agricultural colleges and ex peri- mental stations, will find some means of re-invigorating our orchards by checking these fungi, and that in the not distant future we shall again see prosperity in apple culture. 32 I have not yet given up all hope in the apple orchard, Mr. President, though I have felt very much discouraged during the last three or four years. Mr. Petyam.—lI planted an orchard with something like $130 worth of trees I got from the McGill Brothers. I planted all kinds of roots between them. I afterwards sowed it with timothy and got hay off it for four years, and the blight struck it more or less every year. Since that I have had only grass, and I have not seen a sign of it. A very important thing is good trimming—to scrape the trees and keep this scruff off them. I wash my trees, and keep the bark clean and bright ; I use a lye soap suds lotion. In the last eight years there has not been a sign of blight, either in apples or pears, and I have all varieties. The Seoretary.—Is your orchard in pasture ? : Mr. PetHam.— Yes, for the last four or five years. For eight years I got hay off, and since that it has been in pasture. During the last four years I have spread the manure from the animals there. The Prestpent.—Do you generally get a medium crop every year ? Mr, PetHam.—I get a beautiful crop almost every year. They vary a little, and I could hardly tell the average, but the trees are fit to break down sometimes it is so large. I do not believe in leaving too much top; if you have too much wood your fruit is bound to be small. There is more in working them, and keeping the bark clean and smooth. The PresipenT.—Do you sell in the local market ? Mr. PeLuam.—Yes ; chiefly in different parts of Kent. The PresipEnt.—Do you find many refuse fruit among your apples, or do they gen- erally turn out pretty smooth ? Mr, PeLHam.—All pretty smooth. The Presipent.—Are you troubled with the codling moth in the apple ! Mr. PrtHam.—A little, but I watch for it. The Presipent.—Do you do anything to prevent its ravages ? Mr. Peruam.—No; only the washing and seraping. ‘The Presipent.— What do you do with the fruit that drops ? Mr. Petuamu.—I feed it to pigs. I pick it up immediately, for if you do not, that is where the harm comes in. Do not allow fallen fruit to lie there. The PresipEnT.— You are keeping it in pasture ; what stock do you pasture there ? Mr. PetHam.—Horses, principally. Since it has been in pasture I have not seen a ‘limb affected, either pears or apples. I do not believe in allowing a tree to grow too high; from five to six feet, so you can get under it, [ find best. The SecreTary.—This gentleman who has just been speaking seems to have struck on an important point—that is, with reference to keeping the bark of trees clean by some means or other, I noticed recently that an experiment had been tried by a gentleman residing in England who was very much troubled on account of moss and kindred growths on the trees of his orchard. He used kerosene, and washed his trees in the fall with it, and then in the spring scraped them clean, which was very easy to do after applying this kerosene in the autumn. He said the result was most astonishing, both in the growth of the trees and the qualities of the fruit. Perhaps some gentleman present here can give us some information in regard to this article, whether it would be safe for us to apply it freely to the bark of trees. Prof. Panron.—I am not prepared to say from experience, but one thing is certain, it would drive off insects. Mr. Evererr.—I would not like to try. it very heavily. I once made use of it to kill insects and it killed the tree. Soap-suds, however, I have found to be a good thing. Prof. SAunpErs.—I think the use of coal oil in its undiluted state could not fail to be detrimental to the tree--you would get rid of the tree without any trouble. If the kerosene is emulsified by shaking it with soap or milk—a very violent shaking for a considerable time will convert it into a cream or butter—it can be used with water quite safely, either on the trunks or foliage of trees, stronger, of course, on the trunks than on the foliage. I have known, however, several instances in which kerosene was applied to destroy insects, where its application in the undiluted form resulted in the destruction of the trees also. 33 CURE FOR BLIGHT IN FRUIT TREES. The Secretary then read the following extract to which he had referred : The Rev. Henry P. Dunster states that in six fruit-growing counties he found in all, except a few new-planted orchards, that the trees were covered with mosses, lichens, and in a state of canker and neglect. He asks, “Can anything be done to renovate our present orchards?’ He says that when fruit trees are found in this miserable condition, the reason assigned is that they are decaying from age, or, if this theory be contradicted by the known age of the trees, then that their roots have worked to a cold, dead soil. Neither of these is the true reason. ‘Trees said to be past their prime are capable of renovation, and the roots of plants find the soil that suits them as skillfully as the ferret follows the rat. He attributes the decay to the state of the bark, which fails to supply to the head of the tree what is necessary for growth and fruit-bearing. Moss, lichens and other parasites consume for their own support the sap as it rises, and deprive all other parts of vitality. The roots are generally healthy, whilst the tree slowly dies. Trees die, not because their roots fail to support them, but they die, alas / as many poor waifs and strays of humanity die, the victims of a neglected and unclean skin. The remedy for this is the a) plication to the bark of a substance powerful enough to cleanse it, but leave the tree not only uninjured but with increased vitality. That substance is petroleum, or that preparation of the natural oil so called, which is known to commerce under the name of parafline, the oil now so commonly used in our domestic lamps. Marvellous results have followed from its use. The discovery was accidental. An apple infected with American blight eriosoma, appeared to be dying. It was intended to give it a coat of common oil, bus the oil lamp not being at hand, paraffine was tried, not without misgivings. Almost pint was used with a painter’s brush wherever the blight appeared. All traces of the blight were obliterated, »nd the moss, I believe, soon turned black and died. The following spring the bark was scraped clean, care being taken not to hurt the inner tissues. The success was complete, and resulted in a good crop. : Prof. Saunpers.—I am reminded, after hearing that, of the story of_a certain naturalist, who described the lobster as ‘‘an insect which is red, and walks backwards.” His statement was found to be true with the exception of three particulars, first the lobster is not an insect, second it is not red, and third it does not walk backwards. In all other respects the description was perfectly accurate. The gentleman in the present case says the tree derives its nourishment through the bark, which is quite a new idea, and one which I would like to see demonstrated—I think it would be very difficult to bring for- ward any proof of that being the case. We all know that the bark decays and falls off, and is more a protection than a source of nutriment to the tree. If he visited British Columbia, where the atmosphere is very moist, he would see the youngest trees covered with moss and linchens, and continuing to growand bear fruit under the circumstances, He confounds parafiine and petroleum, which are two distinct things, and does not re- congnize the difference. Those who are familiar with the process of refining coal oil will know that it consists of lighter and heavier oils, which are at decidedly different points as to temperature. The heavy oils approximate more nearly to the vegetable oils, and we all know it is safe to apply linseed oil; it may therefore be that the paraffine oil he uses is a heavy oil; in which case it is quite different from what we know as petroleum or ‘burning oil. I think it is quite probable, or at all events possible, that the application of some of the heavier coal oils might not have this detrimental effect, which I should expect to see result from the use of any of the ordinary burning oils we use. This Englishman, like many of his countrymen, has come to conclusions on insufficient premises —I do not mean that to apply to all Englishmen, but I have associated with some English- men, across the water, who came to conclusions on very insufficient premises, and who, like people everywhere else, required some little enlightenment. The Secretary.—It looks reasonable to suppose that moss and similar growths would extract a certain amount of sustenance or strength from the tree, and that it would be advantageous to remove them. Prof. SaunpErs.—It is reasonable on the surface, but these mosses have no roots that penetrate the bark to any extent—they attach themselves mechanically, and derive 3 (F.G.) 34 their entire sustenance from the atmosphere. There is no drain on the life of a tree covered with them, though I do not think it can be said that they are conducive to the health of a tree, and I think it is very much better to remove them as we would remove dirt from the human skin. We know that children who are brought up in dirty alleys often grow up robust and healthy, but that is not the result of the dirt, but of exposure to the open air. I do not think dirt is detrimental to health, otherwise we should not find so many exceptions as we do in the course of investigations. Prof. Panton.—It is easily seen that lichens cannot take much nourishment from the tree, for we find them on stones as well. Mr. Witson.—I would like to hear Professor Saunders’ opinion as to what -is the best substance to apply. Prof. Saunpers.—I can only give my own opinion in reply to that. For a number of years I have used the following with good effect—a mixture of either soft or hard soap —it is immaterial which—and water in which some washing soda had been previously dissolved, about as much as the water would take up; make the mixture about the con- sistency of ordinary house paint, and apply with a brush from the base of the tree to the crotch, and sometimes over the larger branches. This will be found exceedingly useful in keeping it clean, and will also prevent the borer from depositing its eggs on the bark of the tree, which is of much more consequence than the presence of moss and lichens. The application might be made in the first ten days of June ; it will form a sort of glossy coat or varnish over the tree, which is distasteful to the borer, and will prevent it from depositing its eggs on the bark, as well as in the tree. Dr. McCutty.—I think, from my observation as a resident of this county, that the production of fruit is not in as healthy a state as some years ago, for which I think several reasons might be given. One of the reasons is that it is not as much looked after, owing to the low prices which have been common—it is not such a fruitful source of revenue to the grower, and for that reason he is looking around after something else. Another reason is that a few years ago many of our orchards were just coming into full bearing ; they were, if I may so speak, in their prime, and were not fully developed and covering the land. Now they are fully developed and the land is too small for them ; there is not a sufficient amount of air and the sun’s rays reaching the tree to enable them to come to full perfection, and a great deal of the fruit is stunted. Prof. SaunpERs.— What distance are the trees apart? Dr. McOutty.—All distances. A fruit tree agent comes along and wants to sell some trees, and he persuades the farmer to crowd as many into a given space as he con- scientiously can, and in this way the farmer gets a few more trees on his lot than he otherwise would have done. Many orchards in my part of the country are planted as close as 25 or 30 feet, and some are planted 20 by 30, and the trees have grown so that they are interlacing one another, and many of them dying on that account. Mr. Sander- son, the owner of one of the best orchards on the Lake Shore, cut out one half of his trees. The previous year one half of his fruit was bad, and, as he said, he was determined to have less fruit and yet more fruit. The result surpassed his most sanguine hopes, and he realized a much larger revenue from the orchard. On the Lake Shore they will not now think of planting trees closer than forty feet square, and if you asked them why, they will tell you, ‘“‘ We have the open space in which we can grow crops, and we find at the same time that we get more perfect fruit and more of it.” We crop our orchards every year, and manure too. It takes the bulk of the manure to manure the orchards : the trouble is that the orchards are starving for manure, and have to get it on a great many farias on the Lake Shore at the expense of the rest of the land. The farm yard manure has all to go to the orchard, and they grow the finest fruit you can imagine, but where they do not get it the fruit is not of the same excellent quality, and we have a larger number of orchards than we have the means of fertilizing. It has gone so far that I have heard farmers swear—you know they do break out sometimes—that they would cut down the rest of their trees that they could not manure ; that the land was not yield- ing them what it would if in the natural state without an orchard at all, and T believ,. that will be the result, that many will eventually cut down their orchards. When tree, die they are not planting any in their places, the vacancies are not filled up any more 35 As I have already said, there are many causes why fruit in this county is not in the con. dition it was some time ago, but at the sanie time let no one imagine that this county does not grow fruit. Last year some thirty or torty thousand barrels of apples were shipped from this county, one man putting out ten thousand, and another six thousand barrels — just one half the thirty thousand, and a little more. We grow an immense quantity of apples here, but the great trouble is the want of trimming ; they are not properly pruned. A great many of the trees grow up just like bushes, no trimming of any account being done to them at all, and the deep soil of this county is sufficient to grow a tremendous brush top in an apple tree, and a tremendous crop of apples besides, in spite of all these defects, Another reason why apple orchards are not in their proper state is because proper sites were not selected, the orchards being all put upon the highest portions of the ridge, There is a high ridge, and all the water dips this way for twelve miles, and for half a mile into the lake. They planted their orchards on the highest part of this land, and in dry summers these trees are dried out at the roots ; [ have seen trees totally die in our orchard for want of moisture. If we had them on lower ground. where the water would reach the roots, and manured them, we would have magnificent crops, because orchards situated in those places have borne well when ours on the ridge are lacking. I think it a great mis- take to plant orchards in such a position, and am of opinion that one of the greatest elements of success in the culture of apple orchards is the selection of a suitable sit-, and then to give proper attention to pruning and so on. It has occurred to me to ask the question whether: the shell bark is a protection to them, or whether it is a harbour for insects, and would be better removed, perhaps there is some gentleman here who has some experience tat will enable him to say. Of course this new, fresh bark is exposed to the blasting winds of winter, and I have often thought that perhaps the removal of the shell bark was hurtful to trees. Of the different varieties of apples the Greenings are the favourite with us. There are other good apples too, such as the Russet, which is a favour- ite. The Ben Davis is not a very great favourite; wethink most of the Baldwins, -Greenings and Russets, and there are men in our section who out of a thousand trees have planted nine hundred and ninety-nine Greenings. The Spitzenberg we do not grow at all, it does not amount to anything with us, but in from the shore, on clay ground, they can grow the finest Spitzenbergs I have ever seen, APPLES AS FODDER FOR STOCK. The PresipENT raised this subject by the question,—How do you use your refuse apples 4 Dr. McCutty.—I mostly feed them to the stock on the farm. We gave a large quantity of apples as a bonus to assist a man in establishing an evaporator at Buckhorn, but last year he did not run it ; although he seemed to get very fair prices for the fruit, it did not pay. The Presipent.—Have you ever considered the question of feeding stock with refuse apples 4 Dr. McCutty.—No, only in a general way. I have found that to feed about a bushel to a milch cow a day, makes a considerably larger flow of milk, but I have never tested it by weighing the milk or testing the cream or butter. At the same time one needs to be careful, for it will founder cows too ; I have seen cows eating when we were making cider, and seen them foundered several times. 5 The Secretary.—Professor Mills has said that the elements of a perfect food require to be in the proportion of one to five, that is one part of albuminoids to five of carbo-hydrates; and I have read somewhere that the apple contains about that proportion, and is therefore a perfect food. If that is the case, it is a matter for consideration whether it would not pay us, or the farmers who scarcely know whether their orchards are profitable or not, to grow apples solely for feeding purposes. A gentleman at Rochester (Mr. Brooks) stated that even if farmers could not sell their apples at all it would be the rankest folly to cut down their orchards. He said that a good proportion was two quarts of meal to four quarts of apples, and that cattle would do as well on this food as they would if fed wholly 36 upon meal. He said further that a gentleman of his acquaintance had put up one thou- sand bushels of apples last fall, and fed them all to his stock with the best results. Prof. Panron.—I do not think that an analysis of the apple would show that it con- tained the proportions of the necessary elements requisite to make it a perfect food ; the difficulty is that the apple contains a great excess of the carbo-hydrates over the albumi- noids, and is far from being in the proper proportion. At the same time, when fed with something else rich in albuminoids, such as meal formed from ground peas, or oats, or bran, it makes an excellent food, but fed alone the apple contains too great an excess of carbo- hydrates to make it a successful food. As Dr. McOully has remarked, a great deal depends upon judicious feeding. If you started out to feed apples to cows that had not been accustomed to them, and fed them half a bushel or so a day, the results would probably be serious and not at all satisfactory ; but if you commenced with small propor- tions and worked up to about half a bushel at a feed with some meal—pea meal, or made from a mixture of peas and oats—to raise the proportion of albuminoids, you would have a very good feed stuff, and in that way, | think, the excess of apples that cannot be disposed of in the market might be successfully and profitably got rid of. Dr. McCutty.—How would bran do? Prof. Panton.—Very well; that is where the whole thing rests. The analysis of the apple reveals too small a proportion of albuminoids to carbo- hydrates, smaller than one to five, and to make up for this you must add bran or something rich in albuminoids. You must not bring animals into it at once, but by degrees work them up td it, which may be done with safety, and the experience of those who have tried it in this way has been that it is instrumental in increasing the flow of milk and its value as well. Prof. SaunpERs.— There is one point in connection with the use of apples in hits manner that has not been brought out—their healthfulness in moderate quantities. That is a point which I think needs to be emphasized. If you feed apples judiciously to stock and cattle it will produce in their constitution a degree of health and vigour which will enable them to make the best use of the other food “that is given them, and to draw moré good from it. Dr. McCutty.—The most successful effort I ever made in raising calves was by giving them plenty of milk and allowing them to run in the apple orchard. I never saw animals thrive so well as they did under’ those circumstances. A gentleman told me last fall that his sons had been endeavouring to make a certain calf they had gain three pounds a day in weight, and they fed it for thirty days in the manner.advocated by the professor, with plenty of ground oats, bran and such like, at the same time allowing it to run among the apples. At the end of ‘the time they only lacked ten pounds of being able to fill the bill, and this gentleman said he felt sure that the apples had a great deal to do with their success. Witi1am Macponatp.—I have a great many opportunities of talking over these matters with farmers, and have come to what is to me a satisfactory conclusion. In the first place, I almost invariably find that cattle-feeders feed them to cows, and very seldom to fattening animals; for this, I think, a very good cause can be assigned. There is in milk, in some shape, a large percentage of phosphate of soda, in which apples are also rich, and this, taken in conjunction with the fact that the milch cow is an animal whose nervous system—which is chiefly composed of phosphoric acid and soda—is extraordinarily developed, may have the effect of supplying the necessary constituents. Another thing, if fed in winter they are very valuable as a succulent food alone, much more so than roots. The acid in the apple is very cooling, and has also a medicinal effect. This agrees with the experience of those who keep apples till early in the spring, and feed them in the warm weather ; they find extraordinary results from their medicinal effects when changing from dry grain fodder. Mr. Witson.—I would like the Professor to tell us what is the best feed to use with apples—peas, oats, shorts, bran, or what? There are many who have orchards, and, as he says, the proper way is to bring stock up to apples gradually, it would be interesting to know the best feed to use with “them. Prof. Panron.—Peas first, and corn and bran by weight, taking a pound of each, Mr. MacponaLp.—Put new process bran and peas, “I would not recognize corn at all, and shorts is somewhat inferior to bran. 37 FRUIT GROWING IN KENT. Mr. Mackenzie Ross.—The question has been asked, ‘“‘ What kind of fruits can we grow in Kent?” For my own’part, [ make more money out of early apples than out of late ones, and [ think every fruit grower will agree with me when I say, I think our fall apples are the finest we possess. I never fail in making from 80 to 100 cents out of a bushel of Duchess of Oldenburg. It is a handsome, hardy apple, and comes into bearing when it is young. The Red Astrachan is a littie too acid, and the crop is very often inferior. I would feel very sorry to be without the Russian apples. I havea few, planted in 1873, the first of which is Peter the Great. I have also the Grand Duke Constantine, Count Orloff, Grand Sultan, Nicolaieff and Red Transparent. They are the handsomest apples I have, and I always get twenty or thirty cents a bushel more for Russian apples than any others. They are very beautiful and smooth, and always perfect, and I have very fine crops. Then, of course, the old Early Harvest is no longer considered worth planting. Then we have that eharming apple called the Kentish Fillbasket and the Beauty of Kent. Then there is another charming apple, the Gravenstein ; I am sorry that in this part of the country it is not a late apple. Then we have the Sweet Bough. I remember when travelling through this county in 1873, selecting fruit to be sent to Boston, coming to a gentleman’s orchard, and he said to me, “There is an apple that won’t hurt you if you eat a bushel of them.” I never saw a more beautiful apple than the large Sweet Bough. Then comes the Hawley and then the Alexander; and what is more beautiful than the St. Lawrence? The Rev. Dr. Matheson once said to me that it could never be properly grown out of the Island of Montreal, but I have seen samples in the garden of the warden of the County of Kent that were astonishing. The Ben Davis, though an extremely handsome apple, I consider very inferior. Then we have the Swayzie Pomme Grise, the Russett, the Hastings, and I believe if I went on I could name over a hundred varieties in my own collection. 1 don’t think I have too many. Some people, if they were going to put out a hundred apple trees, would plant ninety-nine Baldwins ; and Ihave seen one gentleman cut down a charming orchard of Ribston Pippins to make room for the Baldwin. The Presipent.—Does the Ribston Pippin do well here ? . Mr. Ross.—It does, and the Blenheim Pippin. As I have said before we consider the County of Kent, with genial climate, has no superior for growing either apples or pears. I would say to those gentlemen who have no Russian apples, by all means get some. Unfortunately they all come in early, but they are most charming fruit. Mr. Lanerorp.-—I have an apple orchard, but I don’t make much money out of it, and I have been thinking whether it would not be better to cut it down, and make more money out of the space in some other way—in raising crops of some kind. I have proba- bly a thousand trees, and for the fruit of at least one hundred of them I cannot get a buyer at all, either the trees are not the right kind or the buyers don’t come here. In regard to my orchard, I have been very much pleased at what [ have heard to-day, and now have a notion not to cut it down; after hearing of the good success met with at the Colonial Exhibition I think probably there will be a market for our apples, and we shall find them more profitable. The Presipent.— What varieties do you find best and grow most of? Mr. Lanerorp.— Unfortunately I have a good many Talman Sweets, and they seem to be a dead letter. The PresipENt.—The only market for them is the Boston market. Prof. SaunpERS.—They are splendid growers ; you should top-graft them. Mr. Bocier.—I am more interested in plums than inapples. I have a small orchard of plums, and my experience is that the Lombard is the best. I brought several varieties on the market last year that I considered were finer, but somehow the Lombards always sold first. The only trouble I have with my plum trees is that they are generally over- loaded. I lost a good tree last year from that cause. One year, when the hogs and cows had been kept out of the orchard the year before, I found a number of curculio, still in the chrysalis state. I let my fowls in the orchard and they scratch up the gronnd and 38 destroy them—as soon as I let the hogs and fowl in I would see the fowls after- wards under these trees every morning. The hogs, I find, are remarkably fond of the unripe fruit, and will travel all over picking it out. . Mr. TyLer.—I am in the southern portion of the County of Essex, about sixty miles from here and three-quarters of a mile from Lake Erie. Iam principally growing peaches aud apples. I have sixty-five trees now, from one to five years old, all of which are looking well ; and I had a very good crop last summer. Most of my apple trees are in bearing; it is eleven years since they were set. I have a number of Greening and Baldwin trees, some Golden Russet, Sweet King, Northern Spy and Ben Davis; the early and late Crawford Peach, the Smock, Alexander and Waterloo. I had somewhere about 5,500 baskets of peaches. I marketed some in Chatham, some in Windsor, some at home; about 800 baskets went to London, some to Hamilton, and fifty or seventy-five baskets, I think, to Brampton. I feel inclined to go on with peach culture. A MemsBer.—Do you cultivate your peach orchard ? Mr. TyLer.—Yes, but as a tree gets larger I do not go so close to it. The soil is very poor—sand and gravel—and I use barn yard manure, what little I do use. Peach trees, I think, are better without manure. Mr. Perrit.—Are there a considerable quantity of grapes along the shore? Mr. TyLErR.—Yes, quite a number. I have one vine of Moore’s Early, the Concord and the Delaware. Myr. Perrit.—What number of acres do you think are occupied in vineyards on the islands ? Mr Tyxer.—I could not tell. President Lyon —What is your practice in pruning peach trees ? Mr. TyLer.—I would run them up one foot from the ground, and I would cut away very few of the lower limbs. The Presipent.—Are you troubled with winter killing. Mr. TytEr.—No. In 1883 winter killing hurt me, but it was a hard winter, and there was a very heavy storm came and swept the snow off, and the trees were exposed all winter. Dr. McCutty.—What is your principal early peach ? Mr. TyLter.—The Alexander. Dr. McCutty.—How does the Crawford grow 3 Mr. Tyier.—I¢ grows very fine and fast, but I think it is not worth cultivation. The Presipent.—Is it not a good grower ? Mr. TyLer.—It is a good grower, but it grows no peaches. It is five years old, and I don’t think I have averaged half a dozen peaches a year. The Early Rare Ripe fruited very well; I am growing some seedlings I have been cultivating, Mr, Evererrs.—Have you the Mountain Rose Peach ? Mr. Tyter.—Yes, I have some. It is a middling good peach, not a very good flavour LI think. It is below the siandard in quality, although it sells very well. I have the “Old Mixon, which is one of the best, of course ; you cannot get many of them. A Memsper.—I come from a county where they have. been trying to grow peaches without much success. ‘en or fifteen years ago a number of parties went into peach ‘culture on the Lake Huron shore. The locality was thought to be favourable, but winter killing interfered so much that we had almost abandoned it. The Prestpent.—What about other fruit ? The Memser.—We have light soil up there, and have to study what is best adapted for it. 1 went up there expecting that the favourable influence of the lake would help me a great deal, bus as regards preventing spring frosts it has very little influence. It keeps oft fall frosts, however, to some extent, and I think perhaps if we paid more -attention to grapes the influence of the lake might help us. We are going into straw- berries and raspberries, and I was interested in hearing the opinions expressed as to the varieties of small fruit, although the matter under discussion relates of course to small fruits for families more than for markets. We are encouraged, however, to believe they can be grown on our light land. The Prestpent.—Do you make a specialty of any kind of fruit? 39 The MemsBer.—I have tried pears. [am afraid, however, that they will not do; the soil is too light. The trees did well when young, and have not been troubled with blight, but they seem to be lacking in vigour, and I am afraid pear growing is not going to bea success on that light land. Neither is apple growing to the extent small fruits and grapes will be. Mr. Hill, an acquaintance of mine, is growing small fruits in another part of the county, on a different soil. Mr. Hii. —During the last two years I have taken an interest in fruit, and this is my first visit to a meeting of this association. I have for several years past had pleasure in reading the Horticu/turist, which I believe has been the means of interesting me in fruit, to make money out of it. When I first went into the centre of the County of Lambton I interested myself in pears extensively for an ordinary person, having some three or four hundred trees. A good many of these have had the blight, some kinds more than others. The Dr. Reeder is a very excellent flavoured pear, and has stood the vlight excellently, and another kind called the Beurre D’ Anjou is almost free from blight ; but I have not found growing pears a success. I have lately gone into the culture of small fruit, and hope in the course of two or three years to give you some experience in that line. The PresipentT.— What kind of small fruit ? : Mr. Hii1i.—Strawberries and raspberries. ‘lhe last two years I have been reaping the harvest of two acres each year. Last year I sold off the two acres $640, and the pre- vious year $630. ‘Two years ago I planted the Turner, which is hardy and ripens quite as fast as I want a raspberry to. I find it too soft for the foreign market, however, but as we have a good local demand, 1 get them there in good shape. Last summer was my first real crop of the Tucner. I had about two acres, about a quarter of which is injured in a way I will speak of again, and out of the two acres | Jast year took $200. Ihave a large number of Cuthberts which seem to be bearing. I am going into blackberries exten- sively, as I find they will be a good market berry, though not so good for home use. In growing my strawberries I just take one crop. I plant them in rows about four feet apart, and about a foot and a-half in the row; cultivate them thoroughly with a horse cultivator, and encourage all the plant I can, doing as little hand work as possible. I cover with straw and rake off in the spring late, so as to keep the plants back as much as possible. By doing this I find I have larger fruit, and get one or two cents per box for it more in our market than is given for that from any other place. My fruit is both larger and pet- ter in quality. I have grown several varieties, and find none so good for the market as Wilson’s Albany. A Memper.—Have you tried-the Crescent ! Mr. Hity.—Yes, but there is one fault with it. It ripens earlier than the Wilson, but the fault I have with the Crescent is that it will not stand shipping. The Wilson will stand much better. I like the Manchester and the Wilson best of all. The Presipent.— Do you pick the Wilson when perfectly ripe, or wait till it becomes darker ? Mr. Htixi.—I caution the pickers to have them well ripe, and those who bring in a basket of fruit poorly ripened don’t get paid for picking it; it is just set aside. I get my pickers from the town and pay them by the box, from a cent and a half to two cents over the rest. I have little cards printed “ one quart,” ‘two quarts,” “six quarts,” and so on, and we have a little card so many quarts, and we just hand out this ticket to the picker and take the basket. The Presipent.—Did you ever try crates instead of baskets ? Mr. Hiit.—No ; I have seen them tried, but don’t like them. In my raspberry patch, about a quarter of an acre of it on the lowland, which is my best soil, my raspber- ries turned yellow and produced hardly any fruit, while on the soil just a couple of feet higher, the canes are very strong. I hope some of the professors will be able to tell me the cause and advise me what to do. [I think the strawberries were more profitable than raspberries. I would suggest that in preparing a plantation the plants should never be taken from the crop in the field, as in that way you take the outside plants, which are very poor. The plan I would adopt in future is to have a piece of soil well adapted for growing roots, and keep it especially for growing plants, and never touch my field at all ; have a place specially for plants, dig them all up, and plant again. 40 A Memser.—Did you grow raspberries in hills or rows ? Mr. Hitt—In rows six feet apart, and from thirty to thirty-six inches in the row, keeping them all perfectly clean and thoroughly cultivated. We take out a lot immedi- ately after the fruit is off. The tendency of raspberries, of course, is to bend down, and f£ this year took the precaution to have my man when thinning out, which I think is neces- sary, especially for the Turner, take out the leaning ones as well as those that were weakly, so my plantation has perfectly straight canes ; all standing up quite straight. Mr. Witson.—Don’t you think old plants bear earlier in. the season ! Mr. Hit1.—They might, but I could realize fully two cents a box more for mine. The red ones grow up probably about two feet. The Turner shoots do not grow up so high in the first plaze, but sprout out lower down, forming a very heavy branch—very heavy at the base. A Memser.—How many plants do you set to the acre of blackcaps ? Mr. Hinz.—If you plant them about six feet and a half apart, and about three and a half feet the other way, about 1,800 plants, perhaps, to the acre. THE QUESTION DRAWER. On reassembling in the evening the question drawer was opened, and the following questions read and discussed : THE PEACH LOUSE. Question.—Is there anyone present who knows the habits of the peach louse, and what is the best way of destroying it ? The Secretary.—lI have not met with a peach louse ; we have an apple bark louse. A Memper.—lIt comes in the month of July, and is very small, like what you find on the cherry. The Prestpent.—We have something about the same among the peach growers on the western shore. I suppose it is the aphis ; I expect that is what is intended. There is. just one process that applies to all these as well as aphides on the apple or cherry tree. In our vicinity its spread has been prevented by destroying it on its first appearance. A Memper.—I have done so, and it has ‘not spread a great deal; I find it on some trees much worse than others. MULCHING PEACH TREES. Qurstion.—When is the best time to mulch peach trees, and when should the mulch be removed ? The Secretary.—I have never been iu the habit of mulching peach trees at all. I don’t understand what purpose there can be, unless to protect the roots in winter time. They don’t require mulching in summer, because we keep them cultivated. I suppose the writer refers to the winter season, to protect the roots. A Memser.—The object is to keep the tree back in the spring—so as to make it late in the spring. It is not liable to a change of weather during the winter. The Presipent.—A friend of mine told me not long ago that he tried growing two or three varieties of peaches in the County of Perth, where they do not grow naturally at all, and, as the frost set in late, he had water under the trees, and he allowed it to freeze well and covered it with a strong, heavy mulch. But at the same time he just killed his trees in the spring by holding that on too long, all except one tree on the north side of the building, where it was naturally frozen till late in the spring. That tree did well and bore fruit. The action of the sun on the heads of the trees while the root power was dor- mant, evidently had the effect of killing them. Dr. McOutty.—I thought the gentleman referred to planting trees. We mulch as soon as possible after planting, in order to retain the moisture. : 41 EARLIEST FREESTONE PEACH. Dr. McCutty.—The Early York comes in earlier than the Crawford, and I think it is one of the best peaches in the country. It is good for the market, not being easily injured by transportation, and it is of very fine flavour. We have two kinds here, a small variety which is very productive, and a large kind called the Honest John, a most mag- nificent peach in every way, its only fault being that the market requires a yellow peach. For my own part I think the white peaches are superior to the yellow. I am told, too, that the Yellow Rare Ripe is an earlier peach than any other. A. M. Smiru.—The Early Purple is the earliest perfect freestone peach I know of, but it is small. We used to cultivate a peach at Grimsby called the Honest John, which was a yellow peach, and ripened fully a week ahead of the Early Crawford. There seems to be some confusion about the Honest John, there being several called by that name. We had some flesh and some yellow coloured. I believe there is a peach known as the Schumacher, that is claimed to be a freestone. Do you know anything about it, Mr. Lyon ! ; President Lyon.—-It is quite an early peach, but not of very good quality ; it is a freestone peach. | THE DOMINION STRAWBERRY, QueEstion.—What do you think of the Dominion strawberry as a market fruit ? A. M. Smita —In our section where we are near the market we have nothing that pays better, but it is not a very good shipper. It comes in after the Wilson, and with us is very profitable, but it will not “stand shipping too far. NITRATE OF SODA FOR STRAWBERRIES. Question.—Could nitrate of soda be profitably employed in growing strawberries, on light soils; and if so can a constant’supply of the unadulterated article be obtained in this country # Prof. Panton.—-I don’t know that it has ever been tried. It might be applied with a certain degree of success but I cannot speak from experience. In regard to its being obtained pure I could not say. [I think it is worthy of trial], but it would be risky for too light sandy soil. I would like to mix something with it, some farmyard manure, to give it more retentive power. I know it has been found excellent on grass land and some of the cereals. The quantity for ordinary crops is about two hundred pounds to the acre. Dried blood has a wonderful effect on Strawberries, not on the berry immedi- ately, but between the rows. MackeNnzIE Ross.—About a year ago I had about a thousand loads of hight soil drawn on to my place and ploughed it in, and I venture to say there were no better strawberries than I had that year. The first year it was a little too hot. The Sharpless _ under this manure did tremendous. by market gardeners down at Carleton, but they have to watch for fear of it burning, and they try mixing it with farmyard manure with very good results. By itself they are very much afraid of it. ' FRUIT PRESERVERS. Quzstion.—Are fruit preserving powders or liquids being successfully and profit- ably used ? Prof. Saunpers.—I shall have to ask whether the idea is to bring out the use of solutions or powders for preserving food to be eaten afterwards, or merely for exhibition. The Secrerary.—I think it is for use. 42 Prof. Ssunpers.— As far as my experience goes I should say that I do not yet know of any fluids for preserving fruits so that they will retain a suffivient proportion of tbeir natural qualities to make them so palatable as to be attractive on the table for eating purposes. Salicylic acid is perhaps the least objectionable of any, and I do not think the acid has anything to do with producing the insipid character of the preserved specimen, I think water has more to do with it. I think that water without the addition of any chemical at all would entirely destroy the freshness of the fruit, that is its freshness and flavour for the table. [I do not look for the introduction of anything of that sort that will prove of much value. I think, however, that these solutions are exceedingly valuable to fruit growers and institutions where it is necessary to preserve specimens for future reference, so as to indicate the size, form and general appearance of the fruit, but I don’t think we are going to get anything better than a strong solution of sugar to preserve our ‘fruit so as to preserve the natural flavour and fitness for the table. Mr, Brauyt.—I think there is one exception. I have seen in my own house goose- berries preserved or kept for three years with nothing but water; of course kept in air- tight jars, and just as nice when taken out as the first day. Prof. SaunpDEers.—That would not apply to ripe gooseberries- Mr. Beatut.—I don’t know. These were just ordinary fruit such as you would obtain for preserving, not ripe. Of course the water had been boile first, and allowed to cool, and they were kept in air-tight jars. Prof. Saunpers.—The character of the green gooseberry is hardly such as to tempt anyone to eat it raw, and it has not such a flavour as [ was thinking of. [am glad, however, to learn that they can be preserved in that way, because it will be useful in preserving samples. Dr. McCutiy.—I referred in the question to preserved specimens such as we have here to-day ; not for domestic purposes. I have seen fruit preserving powders advertised that would keep green fruits fresh any length of time. Prof. SaunpErs.-—The use of these powders is comparatively old; they have been ‘going the rounds this last five or six years, and as far as I have seen they are all salicylic acid, sometimes coloured so as to disguise it, and sometimes mixed with sugar. I know ‘some years ago, when they were first introduced, people who were desirous of preserving their grapes and other fruits paid twenty-five or fifty cents for the receipt, and took it to -a druggist, and found they were buying salicylic acid, and they did preserve them, so far _.aS appearance was concerned anyway. The law of diffusion of fluids, where the fruit is ripe, always results in a lot of water finding its way into the fruit, and a lot of saccharine matter finding its way out. The result was that at the end of a year nobody wanted to eat ‘the grapes, and the business died out after the tirst year—nobody tried it a second time. Now, in regard to Dr. McCully’s point, that of preparing solutions to preserve fruit for exhibition purposes, it will take some time to explain. I have worked at it some months with different kinds of fruits, and the results attained varied with different kinds of fruit. I find that any fruit of light colour—yellow or white fruit—will preserve best in a solution of sulphurous acid, the acid you realize the presence of by the nose when you light a match. Now that frequently averts any tendency to decomposition, and the form. and colour and character of yellow peaches, yellow apples, and yellow raspberries and ripe gooseberries is preserved, and all fruits of that character preserve admirably in that fluid ; and pears, also, will preserve in it in such a manner as to excite admiration. They are a little more delicate looking than is natural, but of course for exhibition purposes that is no detriment, for they certainly retain their form and attractive brilliancy. That was the fluid used at the Colonial Exhibition for all that class of fruits. I learned subsequently that it has been used in some German collections in a similar way, and the fruit kept for several years without any change. At the time I left the Colonial Exhibition the fruits had been in the fluid some four or six months, and did not seem to have suffered at all in appearance. The green colours were not so difficult to preserve ; some were preserved by salicylic acid and some hydrate of chloral, varying from three to five per cent. in strength ; others in boro-glycerit~, which is a mixture of boracic acid and glycerine, also about five per cent. instrength. These two solutions were found to be the best for green and also red fruits, but the success attending the preservation of red 43, colours was only partial, in some instances very partial. I do not think there is any pro- bability of our being able to find a chemical to preserve the red colour of, fruits under such conditions as had to be submitted to at that exhibition, where the fruit were exposed to the sun light all summer long. Some of our red apples could hardly be recognized on account of the lack of colour. That is a class of experiments I hope to con- tinue carrying on, and in the course of time I may be able to give the results of my endeavours in that direction. I do not wish to depreciate the results we obtained at the Colonial, for, apart from a purely horticultural standpoint, the fruits were very beautiful, and considered admirable by the great bulk of the public, but they would not have withstood the criticisms of a horticultural expert. Still, on the whole, the exhi- bition was very fine, and a grand success. Solutions of salt, I have since learned, are perhaps better for the preservation of plums and such fruits as will sink in a solution of salt than the others I have named,*bnt I found that solutions of salt were not well adapted to apples and pears, because the specific gravity of the fluid was so great as to force the specimens to the top, and no matter what devices were resorted to keep them under, the pressure required kept them out of shape, and they burst and were destroyed in that way. There were many difficulties in the way, which were all surmounted in a way which I think did credit to the country. With regard to the strength of the sulphurous acid, the strength I used was about one-half, or in some in- stances one-third the strength it is ordinarily found in commerce. That is, it is a water saturated solution of the acid, and that diluted with one or two parts of water. The salicylic solution was made by dissolving a drachm of the acid in a small quantity of alcohol—about an ounce or two, and adding to that solution a gallon of water. It would partially precipitate, but if stored some time would almost all dissolve, and the small portion that did not dissolve was separated by straining through muslin. Mr. Beatt.—I wrote to you, I think, telling you that a friend of mine had used Spirits of turpentine ; did you try it? Prof. Saunpers.-—I did not, because the regulations of the exhibition would not admit of the use of any inflammable spirits such as spirits of turpentine, on account of the likelihood of fire in case the bottle was broken. I propose to try it when I have an opportunity of doing so without risk. ay purpose. I think it would be exceedingly interesting if some fluid could be found which would preserve apples and similar fruits in their natural appearance for this purpose. I have for quite a time been watching Prof. Saunders’ researches. I have tried salcylic acid and it has given me the best results, but I found out that there was a tendency to precipitate the salcylic acid from the solution. The strength was about sixty grains to the gallon, and I used about a quart of alchohol. Prof. SauNpERS.—Mine was about one or two ounces, added to a gallon of water. Prof. Panton.—I noticed that raspberries maintain their colour pretty well in the salcylic acid. While you could scarcely say it is the natural colour, it is not so bad; but strawberries lose colour almost in a week or two. So far as my experience with it has gone, it seems that you might be very much discouraged in trying to dissolve salcylic acid, Prof. SaunpERS.—A good plan would be to use a little borax, which is itself an antiseptic. COLOURING OF FRUIT. Question.—Is it practicable to obtain colour in fruits independently of the ripening or maturing process ? Prof. SaunpEers.—I cannot see the object of propounding such a question ; I don’t know anyone who would have experience in that matter. President Lyon.—The object, I presume, is to bring out the relative conditions under which colour and ripening are produced. There is an idea, for instance, that colour in vegetation is the effect of frost. I don’t quite believe it ; I don’t know whether others do yet. 44 os Prof. SauvnpERs.—You mean the red colouring matter in the leaves of trees ? President Lyon.—No, in fruits. Prof. SaunpEers.—It seems to be a general law of nature that the red colours do ot, as a rule, obtain until the fruit reaches a stage known as ripeness, or, at least, the stage of maturity which will be the result of keeping. . President Lyon.—In our state of Michigan we have great variations in different locaii- ties, otherwise apparently under about the same conditions, in the colouring of the same kinds of fruit. The Rhode Island Greening in some places will be without the slightest colouring, while in others it will assume a most brilliant hue, and the same is true of almost all other fruits—they colour much more in some localities than others. I have never heard the cause of the difference explained. Prof. SaunpDERS.—It was remarked at the Colonial Exhibition this last year that the fruit from Quebec had a much higher colour than the same from Ontario, and we know hardy Russian fruits are almost all characterized by brilliant colours, which corroborates what has been said by Mr. Lyon. THE INDIAN CETONIA (E£uryomia Inda. ) Question.—There is a kind of bug that has been found on peach trees by a gentle- man near me. What is it? Prof. SaunDERS.—I should think it must be the Euryomia Inda, a family of insects with whose larval history I am not much acquainted. There are several species, all of which are found feeding on sweet fruits. This species before us comes quite early in the season, and a later brood make their appearance in the autumn. Of course they don’t get fruits in the spring, and what they feed on then I don’t know; probably sweet sap, or wounded trees and shrubs. I know I have found them in such situations. Most people, I know, think they are bees, for they fly around in the day time. They merely feed on the ripe fruits; I cannot say whether they puncture sound specimens, or only resort to those already cracked or punctured by other insects. They have never been sufficiently abundant to constitute a serious source of trouble to fruit growers. APPLE PACKING, QueEstion.— What is the most expedient and profitable way to pack apples for the market # The PresipENT.—I don’t know that I can add anything to the advice I have already so frequently given. The besc way we know of is to pack in barrels, and the most profit- able way is to include none but first-class specimens. There are certain kinds of apples, such as the Swayzie Pomme Grise, and possibly the Wagener and Fameuse, which it will pay to pack in half barrels ; the same shape as any other barrel, but only half the size. From a test of it which I made in the British market, I believe it will pay well. But so far as packing is concerned, there is no better way than in barrels. Many have talked a great deal about boxes, but atter my experience of the past season T still prefer barrels to boxes. It seems, so far, that in boxes we have not been able to pack the apples so tight that they will not move, whereas a barrel properly packed is perfectly solid, and they carry admirably. At the same time, while advocating barrels, I would have them with as little bilge as possible. There is a barrel that I tried myself some years ago that is a great idea; it has large quarter hoops, and when you roll the barrel upon these hoops the bilge never touches the ground at all in the rolling. So far as we examined them there was very little in the way of bruising ; they carried admirably. Perhaps something of that sort might be made. The Secrerary.—What do you think of the barrel without any bilge ? The Presipent.—I don’t know; that barrel rolls on the top and bottom hoop. L did try a few Tomlinson barrels ; I think they were made out of whole timber. Prof. SAunDERS.—- What is the objection to boxes ? 45 The Presipent.—The fruit was not packed tightly, and consequently they shook about and were bruised more than in the barrel ; there seemed so be a difficulty in getting them in. A Memper.—In regard to the time apples should be picked—I think we pick our apples altogether too late. The Presipent.—Do you refer to winter or summer apples? The Memper.—Any apples. The PrestpENT.—-There is a season of the year we must pick winter apples. You may leave them as late as you can without danger of frost, but in such a section as this they must be picked in the late fall. _ All I have to say is that they are sufficiently ma- tured for shipping purposes when the apple has reached its normal size and colour. A great many people, I have found, pick their apples and pack them at once. I handled some apples from a man last year who said he made a specialty of that, and if he did I hope he never will again, for certainly his apples arrived in the worst possible condition— all wet and rotten. I believe strongly in what I have always practised myself—leaving the apples on the ground several days, and always packing in perfectly dry weather. Rain or any thing of that sort will not hurt them, and there is also this advantage, that an apple which has naturally colour, but which from being on the inside of the tree or in the shade has not attained it, will gain the natural colour by being allowed to remain on the ground for a few days. Mr. Breatt.—Are summer apples the same as winter apples in that respect ? The Presipent.—If you ship to a distance you will have to pick them before the time of ripening. The Duchess of Oldenberg will ship, but you have to pick it before it is thoroughly matured. Of course, for the local market, I would leave them till thoroughly matured. Mr. Ross.—In this county last year we were a month earlier than usual. On the 20th of September, the date of the Provincial Exhibition, fruits were thoroughly ripe, while those of other sections were green. Probably last summer was the hottest we have ever experienced, and the apples taken down from the trees blistered from the heat. The Ribston Pippins fell before they were entirely ripe, and the heat was so intense that the fruit did not keep on account of being too ripe in the barrel. Although in England it is one of the best and longest keepers ; in this county it is not. It is matured in Septem- ber, and will not keep very long. I think we should be governed by the season. Dr. McCu.ty.—I had some experience i> picking apples too early, and they all puck- ered down under the skin and shrunk. I am of opinion that there is no invariable date for apples to ripen. A man will have to exercise his common sense and be a sort of expert in the business. With us on the Lake Shore it is left a good deal to the buyers ; when they are ready we are willing to pick them, and therefore they are sometimes picked too soon, and sometimes a little late. We generally do better to take them a little on the green side, because we escape the equinoctial winds. Occasionally these winds come along and knock down thousands of barrels. I know some of the best orchards where Baldwins were left to get colour, and a big wind came along and they were all shaken onto the ground, and hundreds of barrels of them were lost. I think we cannot tell exactly, but it is a good plan to pick winter apples quite early. The Presipent.—But, as you say, if you pick them a little too much on the early side they will shrivel. : Mr. Ross.—Yes, a man must be an expert. I think the most approved plan of pick- ing with us is to pick them into the barrels, wi:h the barrel on a sort of sleigh or stone boat, and then to draw them into the stable, or shed, and allow them to stand with the heads open for a week or so. Keep them dry and cool, and away from the sun. We sometimes find when we pick our apples, especially Greenings,—and I leave them in piles under the trees—that if there is the least spot and the skin is broken they will.commence at that spot, and in not more than three or four days it will have spread all over them; a ferment of some kind seems to have taken place. If the apple is kept in a dry place, it is not probable that this would happen in that way. Aud then there are some particular seasons when atmospheric conditions affect apples in that way, which makes lying out of doors bad, and sometimes occasions a great deal of loss. In the hot falls, when the apples 46 are left a good while on the trees, we always find more destruction from rot than when the weather is cold and the apples are not so ripe. Mr. Lyox.—You send a good deal of fruit across the water, I understand, and I have heard the opinion expressed, that it would be good policy to send good fruit packed one by one, each wrapped in paper ; that that course would be profitable. Has that been done ! The Presipent.— Well, packing in paper has been tried, but I don’t know that I would recommend it. We only tried it on a small scale. J don’t know that it is neces- sary ; but as to packing one by one, I believe, no matter what it. costs the shipper to pack, it is better to pay it than to pack imperfectly. It is better to pick them up one by one, and be sure there is nothing wrong about an apple—no spot, wrinkle or worm hole, and to see that the barrel from top to bottom contains nothing but perfect apples. People on the other side don’t begrudze the price ; they make no question about that. What they want is to be sure they have a good article, and they don’t want a medium or poor article at any price. I don’t think it would pay to pack even fine specimens in tissue paper on an extended scale. It might pay for a few barrels for Covent Garden market, but for other markets I don’t think it would. Packing in paper might have some effect in pre venting the spread of disease in a barrel if any of the apples happened to be affected, but I don’t think there is anything to be gained in general shipping. Mr. Dempsey.—In rezard to packing in boxes, I think I would rather risk tender varieties in boxes, not square boxes as we make them, two half-bushel boxes in one, but a bushel box made in one, square or as near as you can get it. [recommend picking them carefully, as you suggest. Every apple that has a spot or worm hole should be left out, and if there is a vacancy in the box which might be filled by a smaller apple, don’t put it in; it is better to stuff in a piece of paper than fill the vacancy with a medium or inferior apple. Never send a poor apple, whatever may be the temptation; try to have every specimen perfect. 1 have seen some varieties of apples sold in England, and so has the President, from 19s. and from that to 2ls. In the ordinary market here, I don’t think people would make a shilling difference in these apples for their own use, but the English are so particular that they will pay any price for a perfect thing. They have plenty of money, and don’t want our poor fruit ; they have plenty of that sort of theirown. They can buy their own green fruit for about two shillings a bushel in the market this year, so you can easily see what nonsense it would be for us to send our poor fruit there to compete with theirs at such prices as that. Some will say at once, “what shall we do with our culls?’ One of the largest fruit growers that we have in our county—one who takes the greates’ t~>uble to select his fruit—has all these culled winter apples, Ben Davis, Russets and Spys put carefully away to keep till the winter. He is now engaged in grinding them up into cider, which he is selling at twenty-five cents per gallon. A barrel of apples will make six gallons. How much more, I ask you, do you get for good apples than he is get- ting for his culls? He is actually receiving more for his culled apples to-day than we generally get for our best apples in the fall, so it is utter nonsense for us to think of pack- ing for exportation poor apples when we can make as much by manufacturing them into cider ; that is winter apples. Mr. Wirson.—What do you do with the cider # Mr. DempsEy.—Sell it at twenty-five cents per gallon by the barrel. Mr. Wutson.—I had thousands of gallons for ten cents last year, and it was often as low as three cents. SALT AS A FERTILIZER FOR ONIONS AND STRAWBERRIES. Question.—Should salt be sown betore or after planting onions; is it useful for strawberries, and when should it be applied ? Prof. Panron.—I should be inclined to sow it just immediately after the onion. I believe it would have some effect on onions, as it has a good effect on asparagus, celery and mangolds. Regarding its application, Isay just immediately after swing, not a long time before, because it is a soluble compound, and would leach the soil. I don’t know. that there have been any great results. Regarding strawberries, [ could not say from experi- ence. [hear a great deal about salt as a fertilizer, and from what I can gather from the United States, it seems to be popular on loamy soil; on clay it is of little or no service. One of the chief functions claimed for it is attracting moisture, but it seems also to have a salutary effect in breaking up compounds in the soil ; alkalies and the phosphate of lime seem to be acted upon to a certain extent. Ihave heard that good results have been noticed a year afterwards. It is generally believed that you get the results the first year, but latterly very practical men who have discussed this matter, claim that as good results have been produced the second year as the year previous. It is claimed for it, and no doubt there is a good deal of evidence in its favour, that it brings what might be termed a vigourous growth in vegetation, and it has a tendency, in a soil’-where you are afraid of a luxuriant growth, to make the plant take a firmer and better hold. This is particu- larly apparent in the case of low-lying soils, where the sowing of salt seems invariably to bring about a healthy condition in the plant. A great many have also spoken in its favour this winter as~ assisting in resisting rust and fungoid growths, and these things. may also be applicable to the strawberry. Mr. Witson.—How much salt should be put on mangolds and asparagus, it is not generally known ? Prof. Panton.—I heard a person remark that he ‘had actually put as much as twenty hundred weight to the acre ; that is a ton. Mr. Witson.—Not for asparagus ? Prof. Panton.—No. I think the application should be from two to four hundred weight. I would never say a ton; this person I speak of had done it accidentally. Some one said he thought six hundred weight was beyond the mark, and this person said he had seen a ton put on, and it did not entirely kill the vegetation. For a garden I would recommend about the same quantity, two to four hundred weight per acre. Mr. Beatu.—I have used for the past twelve or fifteen years half a barrel on 400 square feet. I think it is better now than fifteen years ago. Prof. SaunpreRs.—Did you try one part and Jet the other go without ? Mr. Beatu.—No. Prof. Saunpers.—I have been taught that wild asparagus grows in brackish water- or water impregnated with salt on the sea shores of Europe. I was surprised to find wild asparagus growing in the Alps, thousands of feet above the level of salt water, and: thriving remarkably well, and I thought we had not reached the bottom facts yet, and that possibly salt was not so essential as we have been in the habit of thinking. Mr. Ross.—I have a large bit of asparagus, planted fifteen years ago, and I used to give ita liberal supply of salt, but lately [ have not given it any at all, and I think I have better asparagus now. I use very little salt, and I think itis just as good asparagus as any I see in the country ; I doubt if we require salt for it atall. What you want for asparagus is plenty of manure. They used to dig a trench three feet deep, and put in lots of old shoes and rubbish, and then put a lot of manure on top of that. I am under~ the impression that there is nothing like having your land thoroughly pulverized and rich, then put in your plant and give it plenty of manuring, once a year if possible, before the- winter sets in. It is a very hardy plant, and as Prof. Saunders has said it is a plant that- grows in Enrope as well as in the wild west. I doubt very much the necessity of salt for it at all. It is just an old woman’s notion. ' Prof. SaunpERs.—Mr. Ross is carrying the idea further than I intended to go. IL did not intend to repudiate salt Some years ago, when running a farm, [ planted pease- on land, and ran some furrows down and planted asparagus in the furrows the same way as cora, and with only a top dressing of manure I[ had asparagus on that as fine as any I ever Saw growing in any beds prepared with all the paraphernalia that has been referred to. I think as far as that is concerned it is unnecessary. Mr. MacDonatp.—Salt has another action that has not been mentioned. A liberal dressing of manure on the surface will, if it is applied too thickly, do more injury thin good. Salt has the same action as plaster, it dissolves some of the soluble constituents and carries them down to the roots of the plant, it acts on deep rooted and shallow rooted plants in different ways, it is beneficial to both clover and grass, but on different principles_ 48 In clover it carries the soluble constituents down to the roots, and with grass the chloride of lime formed from the salt does not injure the grass as much as many other plants. There are many conditions of climate, cultivation and so on to be taken into consideration before salt can be intelligently applied, and I think it should never be applied in a greater quantity than 450 pounds to the acre. Dr. McCutty.—I have had great success in salting beds of Canada thistles. If you get right at them you will never be disappointed. I don’t limit the quantity, I am very liberal in the matter, and [ tell you it is good for Canada thistles. EXPERIMENTAL STATIONS WANTED. QueEstTion.—Ought not fruit growers to ask the Dominion and Ontario Governments to establish one or more stations for testing fruits and experimental purposes ? Prof. SaunpERrs.—The whole system of experimental agriculture is at present in its infancy. Iam doing my best to work order out of chaos, and have not reached any definite conclusions on the-point mentioned, and would therefore rather be excused from answering, Mr. Ross.-—I think the County of Kent might show something to them if a station were established in it, because the climate is congenial to fruit. Prof. SaunpERs.—It is the intention to make the central experimental station fall in with the work carried on at the different farm stations by distributing plants and seeds which it seems desirable under the circumstances to test in the different sections of the various. Provinces, and thus far it will meet the want indicated in the query; it is im- possible at the present time to go any further into the particulars than that. The meeting was then adjourned till the next morning at nine o’clock. CANADA AT THE COLONIAL EXHIBITION. In the evening a banquet tendered to the association by the County Council of Kent ‘was held in the Garner House, and after the usual loyal and patriotic toasts had been disposed of that of “Canada at the Colonial” was proposed, coupled with the names of President A. McD. Allan and P. C. Dempsey. Mr. Auian. —The subject with which you have so kindly coupled the names of Mr. Dempsey and myself is indeed a very comprehensive one, for during the three months we were over in the old country we saw a great deal. Speaking for myself, it was the first time I had crossed the Atlantic, and the first opportunity, therefore, I had had of seeing or personally knowing much about our parent nation. To do full justice to “Canada at the Colonial” would be a task of many hours, but as the audience present is a’ mixed one, consisting mainly of gentlemen interested in agriculture and horticulture, it may, perhaps, be well to touch only upon a few of the features of that great exhibition, in which they will be specially interested. To begin with cattle, as we have many farmers here, I had an opportunity at the great Smithfield Cattle Show, considered the great fat stock show of England, of judging, as far as my judgment goes in such matters, of the quality of the stock, taking.it for granted that at that show I saw the best specimens of the particular grades of stock in that country. It was acknowledged there that they never had a finer exhibition of fat stock, especially hogs. I must say that according to my judgment our own stock breeders could hold their own with those of Great Britain in all points but one. Our roots and vegetables attracted much attention on the part of the farming community in England, and they were fain to acknowledge that even with their high state of cultivation they could not grow better or even as good roots as those produced in Canada. At the Smith- field show the roots were beautifully trimmed up, but compared with ours they were not the average size, and there was not as much feed to the acre of grain there as with us, although they manure and cultivate their soil to a far higher degree than our farmers do 49 here. Mr. Dempsey and I felt proud of our roots and vegetables. Then, as to our fruits. There has been heretofore a very wrong impression prevalent in Britain regarding our country. The general impression, even among the better educated class of people there, is that “this Canada of ours” is a land of snow and ice, where polar bears and Indians may be encountered almost everywhere. I have often been asked if I wasn’t afraid of the Indians, and on such occasions would sometimes refer them to my head as a specimen of the Indian’s prowess with the scalping knife. Ido not think our Dominion Govern- ment could have devised anything more effectual in dispelling that idea of Canada than was the display of fruits grown in the Dominion made at the Colonial Exhibition. At the beginning of the season there was nothing but the fruit in jars, preserved in acid, which were admired very greatly ; but the British public were suspicious of them, and entertained in many instances serious doubts of their being genuine fruits. The remark was often made, ‘“ Oh, yes, it is all very well ; it looks very pretty, but for all we know it may be wax.” I have often heard them when exchanging opinions with each other, express a doubt as to whether they were really specimens or waxen imitations of fruit. When the unpreserved fruit came to hand we had often to allow them to taste and see for them- selves in order to dispel the allusion, and certainly our display astonished them very much indeed. The display was arranged in such a way as to attract the greatest amount of popular attention. The building in which it was exhibited was a large conservatory, run- ning from east to west, and we laid out the fruits, commencing at the eastern end with Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and the eastern part of the Dominion, province by province, finishing up with British Columbia at the western extremity, showing the fruit of Canada from ocean to ocean. They were arranged in groups of provinces, not societies, showing the province the fruit was grown in and the particular society by which it was sent, or, if an individual, the name of the person. As far as we could we had the name of the grower on each plate, giving the name of the fruit and its particular variety, and of such a display as we had I assure you we felt very proud. I did expect at the time the fruit was being collected here that our exhibit would be something grand, but in my most sanguine anticipations I fell far short of the reality ; I never expected it would be so perfectly grand as it turned out to be. As I said to Mr. Dempsey, after working all night to get it in order, I felt like going to Oxford street and investing in the highest plug hat to be found in all England. I don’t know how any Canadian could feel other- wise than proud of such a magnificent display. "We did our best to give all the information we could to the people, and to keep our exhibit before them. Wherever you would look your eye would be attracted by a label with ‘ Canada” conspicuously marked in gold leaf letters; we wanted to keep their attention upon our country as much as possible. Other labels showed the particular part of the Dominion from which they came, and we had also an attractive yellow label with black letters, on which was printed, “ All Grown in the Open Air by Ordinary Field Culture,” which attracted much atten- tion, and the thousands of people looking at that and seeing the brilliancy of the colouring of our fruit as compared with their own, could hardly believe that ours had been grown in _the open air, the impression, even of the fruit growers being, that we must have employed some species of hot-house culture to produce such brilliant colouring and colossal dimen- - sions. Now, from my experience there I have come to the conclusion—and being a _ shipper myself I feel privileged to make the statement—that our system of purchasing fruit from the grower and paying the grower has been a wrong one. I suppose the practice this year has been the same as in former years, the buyer paying as a rule an average of one dollar per barrel for winter fruit ; that has been the general rule. Now, I believe the way we ought to buy the fruit is according to its variety. I have made a calculation upon some few varieties according to the prices obtained in the British market. _ The King of Tompkins County is worth per barrel in the orchard $1.50 ; Fallawater, $1.30; Baldwin, $1; American Golden Russet, $1.15; Mann, $1.15. The Northern Spy, spotted as we have had it this year, is worth about 90 cents, but if you can get a first-class quality without spot, it is worth $1.40. IfI take the Swayzie Pomme Grise according to the best prices obtained, it is worth a great deal more—$2 ; but I don’t think I would be justified in putting it at that. I am quite satisfied, at all events, that it would be to the interest of shippers in buying hereafter to purchase fruit in that way, if not upon that 4 (F.G.) 50 scale, upon one something like it, paying for each variety as it grows. If you find a par- ticular variety grown to perfection, pay the growers for it, and in that way there will be encouragement for them to grow to perfection the kinds which will obtain the highest price. We did not have much opportunity of testing Grimes’ Golden on the British market, because we got so little. Rhode Island Greenings would give $1 this year, and, by-the-by, I think it is going to excel the Baldwin in the British market for price. This year Greenings came up wonderfully, and I found that the prejudice in the British market against green fruit is dying out. They are looking more now to quality, and for that reason I believe that before very long the Rhode Island Greening will bring a higher price than the Baldwin. I don’t know that it is necessary for me to say much in regard to packing, except that it will pay a shipper, no matter what it costs him, to cull them out thoroughly, and secure nothing but the most choice specimens, perfectly clean, and without spot or wrinkle. Then they should be sized and coloured—that is, all the apples of one size and colour put together in one barrel, and marked according to what they are. Be honest with the man at the other side and the consumer, and let your apples always be fully up to the standard of the brand marked on the barrel, and you will find the British buyers will pay the highest price for them, and in that way you will realize better prices than you can by mixing different fruits in one barrel. I would advocate having three classes or brands, and you will realize better prices for the large and highly coloured apples, whereas if you mixed smaller ones with the larger ones, and green fruit with that which is highly coloured, you will only get prices below the medium, not the average at all. If you cull them out you will get three different prices, and for the poorest brand of the three you will get nearly as much as you would have done for the mixed ones, while for the highest quality you will raceive the highest price going. The buyers in England are on the lookout, and when you have adopted a brand and they find that the apples are good, they will be on the alert for it, and if a barrel of a certain brand is found to contain apples inferior to what is represented, they will avoid that brand ; so it is a point on which shippers cannot be too careful. If in shipping one year your apples did not turn out to be as good as represented, your next year’s shipments, even though they might consist of the finest apples that could be obtained, would be injured by it. Many shippers this year took advantage of the Colonial Exhibition to ship to the London market in preference to others, and doing so, shipped direct by water. From my own experience, I would warn them -against doing this, for I found that the experience of every man there who had received fruit from this side direct to London by water was disastrous. The fruit was injured on the passage up the Thames, and arrived in the market fully a week later than if landed at Liverpool and forwarded on to London by rail, thus entailing a double loss—the loss of a week’s time, and the damage and pilfering consequent of their having to pass through so many hands. For this pilfering, the steam- ship companies blame the dock hands, and they in turn blame the custom house officials, and you can get no satisfaction at all ; and we found that much better prices were always realized by shipping via Liverpool by rail to London. Besides that, coming up the River Thames is expensive. The dock companies’ fees were something enormous,—eightpence per barrel landed on the dock, and then fees to the Duke of Bedford and goodness knows who not. The railways do charge too high a rate, however, from Liverpool to London at present, but they are going to pull the rates down. I have talked that matter over pretty thoroughly with the officials there, and I also suggested that the railway companies should provide accommodation at their stations centrally located in the city, where buyers could in a reasonable time buy, and the fruit be disposed of without expense, no rent being charged if the fruit is disposed of, instead of dealing at Covent Garden market, where the ubiquitous Duke of Bedford has to be paid a fee of three half-pence on every barrel. The railways took that up pretty well, the Midland so heartily that they had bought out half a block and started a new depot expressly for this purpose before I left, so that next year they will compete strongly for all the Canadian fruit going to London, and there will be no rent or charge to the shipper, and the fruit can be sold right in their own depot or kept for a reasonable length of time without charge, a point which will be of great value to our shippers. Then there is another point. All the last part of the season, through December, I cabled shippers sending me fruit to ship to London via Liverpool, 51 and I made an arrangement at London that if the Liverpool prices were better than the London prices, to stop it at Liverpool and sell there. If it would pay the difference in freight we allowed it to come on to London straight and sold there. Some of the gentle- men I dealt with in London also did business in Liverpool, and in that way I had the advantage of two markets ; then, again, in other markets. Liverpool, of course, is the distributing point ; they handle more than London or Glasgow. I found the markets varied a good deal with the supply and demand. I had one cargo, I remember, of 14,000 barrels, of which I had advice. The moment the steamer was in the Mersey, I thought to sell in Liverpool, but prices went up in Glasgow and I sent it on there ; but before the vessel had arrived at Glasgow I had sold the 14,000 barrels in Copenhagen, Denmark. I took the night train to Glasgow, had them transhipped, and got my money in Glasgow. That is the best sale 1 made—32s. That, however, was delivered free in Copenhagen, but after paying all the expenses there was a very handsome profit left for the shippers, several of whom were concerned. Speaking of that, I believe that Copenhagen is going to be a valuable market for this country. Apples from this country have been received in Sweden, Norway and Denmark before, but I think this year they know them pretty thoroughly and appreciate them, as we were able to send them a very fine sample of fruit, At the same time, I am sorry to say that we got some brands in England that were not up to the mark. The packing generally was good. I find that the packers generally have got into a systematic method of working and generally pack well, if they would only cull out properly, and stop the miserable practice of putting in small and wormy fruit in the centre of the barrel, thinking the buyers will never find them. The buyers are very particular, and open up one end of the barrel and go down a little way, then turn it over after closing the barrel and investigate the other end, and if there is any suspicious appearance they will shake it out to see what it contains. They go through it here and there until they learn thoroughly the kind of fruit they are receiving from that particular shipper. Even if they have received several consignments of number one fruit from a shipper, they will turn over a barrel of his shipments here aLd there, so a shipper can never expect to escape if he establishes a reputation and then tries to trade on that with inferior fruit. I tested the matter of shipping in half barrels. I took out a number of small barrels that are used for shipping Virginia Newton Pippins in ; it would take about two and a quarter of them to make a barrel of the size of ours. I lined these with paper and filled them with choice Swayzie Pomme Grise apples, and then went round to some of the best buyers and handed them a few apples to taste, telling them I was going to offer a few for the Christmas trade. They were offered there and started at 20 shillings, running up to 27 shillings the half barrel, the highest price ever known there except for Virginia Newton Pippins, for which very high prices are paid. That was better than 54 shillings for our barrel, but I do not think a large trade could be done in that way. There is a certain fancy trade which can be done in Covent Garden market for Christmas, but the trade would be very limited, of course. There are many other markets opening out for us, an important one of which is India. I look for the time when the Canadian Pacific Railway will have a first-class steamship line running across the Pacific, and we can do a good trade with India in apples. I understand that at the present time the _ price there is equal to sixteen cents per apple for Canadian apples, It seems that some American and Canadian apples have found their way to India in vessels carrying ice, and the prices realized have been sixteen cents per apple. I have been told by officers of the Indian service I have met, that although the market there would not be a very large one —because the class of people who could afford to pay for a luxury of that kind are not numerous—still it would pay, and that some of our varieties that will carry long distances would find a market there. As far as the distance is concerned, I don’t apprehend any trouble in that respect myself. With a first-class line of steamers, such as the Canadian Pacific intend running, I do not think there will be any more risk in shipping there than to Liverpool. Then we tried France and Germany, and although the prices were not very extra, they being fruit growing countries and their people knowing little or nothing in regard to our apples, we got prices that under the circumstances rather astonished us ; that paid expenses at all events, and in some cases a little over. From all that we have done and seen, I feel confident that there is market room enough for all the apples we 52 can possibly grow, and I am more satisfied than ever that in this Province of Ontario, or, “this Canada of ours,” we can grow apples equal, nay, superior to any country in the world, not even excepting our good friends across the line; for, taking the average of the market during the last year, our apples sold for an average of three shillings a barrel more than theirs did. I am under the mark when I say that. On regular market days, when lots of fruit are being offered, you will see the buyers there in hundreds waiting around for something to suit them. If any European fruits are offered they are very indifferent, and don’t seem to care at all. Then when the American fruit is offered the bids begin to come in, but when the seller announces from his stand that he is about to dispose of a few thousand barrels of Canadian apples, you will see them crowding right up to the desk to see what he has to offer, and the bids come in lively then, I assure you. It is the liveliest business I have seen for some time, to see our fruits sold in Covent Garden and other markets of Britain. I think I am not far astray when I say that the effects of this Colonial Exhibition in all our departments will be something grand for our country. From the conversation we had with farmers and others having sons and friends desiring to emigrate, we found that they were all anxious to gain a little more information of our Dominion, about the state of agriculture and horticulture, and they were all much inter- ested when they came to see our display of fruits and vegetables. Every day we were told of relatives who were going to emigrate, for they are over-populated there in every direction, and all had made up their minds to come to Canada. We did our very best to give them reliable information, to let them know what the country is without overshooting the mark, and explained to them carefully our climate and other matters of interest. We did not want them to come here with the idea they were going to land in a perfect paradise at once, but told them the kind of people we are, and, indeed, from their remarks, I believe they thought we were about the liveliest people they had ever met ; our methods were quite different from theirs. That is one point I noticed in Great Britain. You see the spirit of progress in Canada in all departments of agriculture, horticulture and every- thing else which is lacking in Britain. People there seem to have the idea that everything in that country is done and finished, and certainly many things there are brought to a much more perfect state than they are here. The buildings look as if they were built to last forever, and the farms and lanes and gardens are very beautiful. But the people have settled down to that idea, and they are loth to adopt any new improvement. That is a point in which we have a great advantage in this country. I don’t think I could give our Government too high a word of praise in speaking of that Colonial Exhibition, and of everything I observed there of the conduct of our Canadian affairs. I think everything was done there that could be done to advance the interests of the country in every depart- ment, and I believe that the result will be reaped at no distant day. I believe that when the spring opens we shall see a tide of immigration of a better class than we have ever had before. I am receiving by every mail letters from England and Scotland containing inquiries as to the prospect here, many of them being something like this: —A young man writes to say that he has eight hundred pounds to invest, and wants to go into farming or fruit growing, but would like first to engage with some farmer or fruit grower for the purpose of becoming acquainted with our methods, and in the meantime look around for an opening to invest his money to the best advantage. Many inquire in that way, young men who say they are not afraid of work. They say they were brought up on a farm, but cannot make anything at home. We have invited them in the warmest possible way, winding up by telling them that in coming to Canada they will still be under the old flag always dear to them, and are coming to live with one of the children of the mother country. - REPORT ON THE COLONIAL EXHIBITION. At a subsequent stage the following report on the Indian and Colonial Exhibition was read by the President: GENTLEMEN,—Presuming that a short report of our visit to the Oolonial and Indian Exhibition, held in London, England. during the past season will be of some interest to 53 you, especially in so far as it relates to fruits and vegetables, we beg to submit the following : When assisting at home in the work of collecting specimens for the display we looked forward with much interest to the time when such display would be arranged upon the tables at the ‘“Colindries,” as we anticipated that it would be both large and fine in samples. But although our anticipations were large we were actually astonished at the result, both as regards the number of specimens and their general fine appearance when laid upon the tables. It is only repeating the expression of a number of newspapers as well as many thousands of visitors, when we say that the fruit display of Canada at that Exhibition, was the largest and finest ever seen together in Europe. The immense con- servatory of the Royal Horticultural Society was filled completely, and still we had five hundred plates of apples to exhibit at the Edinburgh Exhibition. The conservatory in which these fruits were exhibited we took to represent Canada» and our display was laid out in provinces beginning with British Columbia on the west andcoutinuing eastwards until it closed with Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, thus shewing fruits representing the vast stretch of country from ocean to ocean. Each sec- tion was designated by a large printed card shewing to what province it belonged, and this surmounted by another on coloured cardboard stating that ‘“‘ these specimens were grown in open air by ordinary culture.” Besides these large coloured cards were to be seen in every point to catch the eye bearing the important inscription, “ Canada.” Thus laid out it was a grand picture, shewing as it did most conclusively that our country is not, as had been thought by many thousands in Britain a land of eternal ice and snow, wild Indians and polar bears, but a land possessed of a variation of climates, and scarcely any too severe to grow some variety of fruit, and most of it capable of producing the finest samples. It was a living picture that did not appeal in vain to the thousands who looked upon it so admiringly, it was a picture that eloquently and truthfully told of the beauties and goodness of our country and its climates, and it was a picture that took a firm grasp upon the hearts of the people and made an indellible impression upon their minds. To give an idea of the extent of this display we give each collection as follows :— British Columbia, apples, 180 plates ; pears 54 plates; making a total from that province of 234 plates. _ Provincial Exhibition, Guelph, apples, 356 plates ; pears, 84 ; peaches, 23 ; quinces, 24 ; plums, 19; grapes, 138 ; making from that exhibition a total of 644. Bay of Quinté Agricultural Society, apples, 288 plates ; pears, 68 ; quinces, 2, grapes, 80 ; making a total from that society of 438 plates. West Riding of Huron Agricultural Society, apples, 234 plates ; pears, 66 ; quinces. 4; grapes, 51 ; and plums, 13; making a total from that society of 368 plates. Besides exhibits from Ontario from individual growers of apples, 49 plates; pears, 22 ; plums, 7 ; and grapes, 13. In all 84 plates. Or by the Province of Ontario, a total of 1,534 plates. The Montreal Horticultural Society had apples, 198 plates; pears, 4 ; cranberries, 1; 203 plates. Abbotsford Horticulttral Society had apples, 47 plates, and pears 11 plates—58. Dominion Exhibition at Sherbrooke had apples, 76 plates ; pears, 9; and grapes, 16 plates—101; making for Quebec province a total of 362. Nova Scotia province had of apples, 334 plates; and pears, 3; or a total of 337 - plates. New Brunswick province had of apples, 144 plates ; and pears 5; ora total of 149 plates ; making a total for the Dominion of 2,616 plates. 54 Besides this display, earlier in the season there was laid upon the tables a small dis- play consisting of 140 plates of apples, 10 of pears and 4 of plums from the Province of Quebec ; 134 of apples, 37 of pears and 11 of plums from Ontario ; and 82 of apples and 7 of pears from Nova Scotia. There was also exhibited at the Edinburgh Exhibition a surplus, being fruit sent from London, Ontario, and the Niagara district, that could not be got on the tables at the Colonial of 419 plates of apples and 9 of pears; 63 of apples from Quebec, 10 of apples from Nova Scotia and 8 from New Brunswick. Thus making in all exhibited during the season, from Ontario, 2,144 plates; from Quebec, 579 plates ; Nova Scotia, 436 plates ; British Columbia, 234 plates, and New Brunswick, 157 plates. Making for the Dominion during the season a grand total of 3,550 plates. When the Exhibition closed we selected from the tables the best specimens for the Industrial Exhibition at Glasgow, making fully 500 selected plates of apples. Besides | which a collection sent from Prince Edward Island which arrived too late to be displayed at the Colonial was forwarded also to Glasgow. All the remaining specimens were dis- tributed amongst leading citizens, charitable institutions, and wherever we considered that the most credit as well as benefit would result to our country. In a number of instancee, both in England and Scotland, we placed small collections of choice long-keeping kinds in the windows of leading fruiterers with a display card showing that they were of Canadian growth. Of the fruit sent over by the Government to test commercial values, we found that plums sent in bushel boxes did not carry well, indeed there was not enough to make up one box out of all that was sent over. But while we feel satisfied that had these been sent in cold storage they would have carried well ; we would recommend that plums should be sent in smaller packages, and in any case they should be shipped only when not perfectly ripe. The early pears also were too ripe when shipped to carry by ordinary freight. But apples carried fairly well and realized good prices for finesamples, Duchess of Oldenburg and St. Lawrence brought seven shillings per box. We believe that in these cases also if all had been in cold storage they would have arrived in perfect condition. But grapes whether in or out of cold storage did not as a rule carry well. Of the varieties specially observed the following carried perfectly, Prentiss, Clinton, Telegraph, Rogers 44, Arnold’s hybrids. The following were fair:—Vergennes, Rogers 36, 22, 9, Burnet, Allen’s hybrid. We could get some fairly good bunches in each box of the following, Delaware, Iona, Diana, and the rest of Rogers grapes not already mentioned. But Lady Washington, Concord, Hartford Prolific, Champion and Niagara were so shelled off that it was only possible to get enough to make a plate or two for the tables. Prof. Saunders’ new grapes ‘‘ Kensington” and “ Emerald” which were packed in a box with other fruits carried perfectly. But we believe a large share of the loss (probably most of it) was due to the roughness in handling the packages in transit, and if the grapes had been packed in handle baskets we believe they would all have carried fairly well. The express com- panies deserve the utmost censure for the way such things are handled by them, indeed the fruits could not have been worse off in this respect had the Government sent all by ordinary freight. If we were to endeavour to find a market in Britain for our grapes it would be difficult to introduce them for dessert, as their quality is not as good as that of the home grown hot-house grapes and those imported from France. Besides cultivating a taste for them we would require to sell at a low enough price to enable those to eat grapes who cannot aftord to pay high prices for hot-house varieties. But sufficient has been seen and tested by manufacturers to assure us that they will become decidedly popular for wine making, and if the provisions of our liquor Act will permit of it there will be no difficulty in establishing large manufactories in grape growing districts for the purpose of wine making. Already one firm has signified its intention of establishing such a factory provided the law does not interfere. Their intention is to manufacture wines from grapes and also clarified cider from apples. The tests that have been made have been eminently satisfactory. One gentleman who used some of our refuse apples in cider making said that the quality of the juice extracted was so strong that it would bear twenty per cent. of water added, and then be as good as the juice of English apples. It was instructive to observe the difference between the British fruits in the market and the samples shown on exhibition tables, the former being wretchedly small and spotted, 55 while the latter were simply magnificent in size, but fineness of form and colour were wanting. The samples shown at the Crystal Palace show, as well as those exhibited in the conservatory at the annual exhibition of the Royal Horticultural Society were all wall grown fruits, and besides»many of the growers admitted that they required high cultivation and manuring in order to produce such specimens. Indeed it was most evident from the spreading eyes and knotted and ribbed forms of the apples, especially that such was the case. In point of flavour from all the tests we could get, such fruit is very in- sipid compared with our naturally grown specimens, and there is a wonderful want of tenderness in flesh in all English apples and pears. An English Duchess of D’Angouléme is scarcely better than a sweet turnip, indeed they do not pretend to eat it at all, and many growers who tasted some of our specimens were astonished at their richness. We hope our steamship lines will be induced to place in all their vessels a cold storage compartment for shipping our early and soft fruits. Our early apples especially can all be shipped to Britain successfully, and we believe prices will rule high for them, as local early varieties as well as those from the Channel Islands and Belgium are inferior to ours both in colour and flavour. The Royal Horticultural Society very kindly met and examined a number of seed- lings and hybrids in our fruit list and their report will be forthcoming. They also examined many of our regular varieties and will no doubt give their views in their report. Besides the silver medal awarded to our exhibit last spring that society also granted us a special medal for our general display of fresh fruits. But our fruit tables did not claim all the attention of the public when we placed the roots and vegetables on one large table. Farmers and their sons were continually examin- ing that table, and certainly it did look most attractive when arranged in three large pyramids, one on each end of the table and another in the centre with specimens covering the space between. People seemed quite dazed at the sight and but one opinion was expressed by all, namely, that England could not produce such fine specimens. We never before in our experience gave much thought on the question of raising large pumpkins and squashes, but gentlemen, you should hear us waxing eloquent over a 200 pound squash, or a rich coloured mammoth pumpkin. Daily when in conversation with people, farmers and their sons would express their determination to come to our country. Many of the vegetables were strange to most of the visitors of course, and it was amusing to hear the questions asked regarding them. But there was intense interest evident in every visitor. Our green corn attracted very general attention and the enquiry of thousands who had been either in Canada or the United States and had tasted corn in the ear, was ‘“ why don’t you send corn over to this country?’ We believe there is a very large market in England for our table sweet corn, and if cold storage on our steamships be adopted this is another article that can be successfully shipped. Tomatoes also are wanted in large quantities, especially the smooth varieties, and we believe high prices will be obtained, as those in the markets from the Channel Islands do not average so large as ours, nor are they so bright in colour. It was remarkable, and to us most interesting, to see that the object of our display was so universally accomplished in the fact, that everyone spoke out and in their wonder at the sight before them, remarked that Canada must have a finer climate than had been - thought when such fruits, roots and vegetables would grow to such perfection. People in Britain were brought up to think of our country as little better than a polar region, but now that they are convinced by staring at actual facts and handling the specimens before them that such is not the case, we look for an increased emigration to our country; and we will not be disappointed for the people we met and conversed with are evidently in earnest, desiring to improve their condition in life by changing from an over-populated country and high taxation to a rising country where there is room for every honest industrious man. At the close of the exhibition we divided the roots and vegetables among those who will exhibit them in their shop windows as long as they remain in condition. We believe it would pay our Government to send over fruits and vegetables to some of the exhibitions in inland cities in England, where the population is largely agricultural I would have the effect of drawing thousands of young farmers to our country who are 56 now either going into other pursuits or emigrating to the United States or Australia ; for they know more about these countries than they do about ours because Jey have seen more of their produce exhibited in such a way as we now recommend : To advertise a country by showing its products is the most convincing, most truthful and by far the cheapest method. AuEx. McD. ALuan. P. C. DEmMpseEY. Prof. SaunpErs.—I think the thanks of this association are due to the President and his associate, Mr. Dempsey, for this very full report of the Colonial Exhibition. I_am much pleased to find that the views of those gentlemen are so fully in accord with my own in this matter, with regard to the exhibit of grapes. That exhibit, even from a com- mercial standpoint, was got up more to illustrate the character of our climate than with a hope of introducing our grapes for actual sale as a source of profit to this country. When in England, in the spring, we had grapes in bottles only, and people would often congregate around the stand and wish for an opportunity of handling and tasting these grapes, and could scarcely believe they could have been grown in the open air in a country so cold as this, when they in England could not doit. It required a great deal of argu- ment and persuasion to convince them these things were genuine, and I was so strongly impressed by this that I thought it would be one of the wisest things we could do to send over a quantity of these grapes, which could be handed round and tasted by the hundreds of thousands of people daily visiting the exhibition, and thus demonstrate to them that these things were solid, substantial realities, and that we could grow these grapes in the open air. I think the delegation have stated the results very correctly, and pointed to the fact that it is highly probable that this exhibit will have more direct influence on immigration for years to come than anything the government has ever done in this way. I found on inquiry that a large proportion of immigration from Great Britain went to Australia, and was told that they did not like to go to a climate where they would have to suffer so much cold as in Canada. The average Englishman does not take any special pains to make his house warm, and when the thermometer goes down to zero there is much suffering among those who live in such houses, and they reach the conclusion that if they suffer so much at home, what must it be in Canada where it is frequently twenty and thirty below zero. They know nothing of our system of keeping comfortable and warm, and, in fact, we do not suffer half as much from cold here as people in England do, THE QUESTION DRAWER. Business was resumed on Thursday morning at 10.30, when the following questions were read and discussed : APPLE BARRELS. QueEstion.—I would like to ask the President if he noticed when in England whether the Nova Scotia apple barrels were the same size or smaller than ours ? The PrestpEnt.—They were smaller than ours. The same barrel has been used for a great many years there, one containing two bushels and three pecks, I believe. They were observably smaller than ours in all the markets. Mr. Evererts.—The same size as the American ? The Prestpent.—I found that the American barrels there varied in size.‘ I think the Nova Scotia barrel was the size of most of the American barrels. The standard for apples is three bushels, the same size as a flour barrel. ~~ 57 BLACK KNOT. QUESTION. profitable ? Prof. SaunpERs.—There is so much in the character of the season to influence black knot, that that is a very difficult question to answer without some preliminary explan. ation. Some seasons it prevails to such an extent that it would be exceedingly difficult to keep it under anything like reasonable control. I think as a rule there is no difficulty in keeping it under control if plum growers are careful to watch for the first indications, and to remove them and burn the knot, so as to destroy the spores of the tungus which are forming in that knot. If taken in its inception in that way and watched carefully, there will be little difficulty as a rule in keeping this class of disease under. There are exceptional seasons, however, when it is exceedingly difficult. Forty-five years ago now, almost all of you will remember, not only plum trees, but cherries almost all over Ontario became go affected with it, especially the common red cherry, that in many districts whole orchards had to be cut down and destroyed. There are sections of the country where formerly many cherries were yielded in which none are now grown on account of that and the following seasons. Since that time it has become comparatively scarce and less troublesome. When it abounds like that it is most difficult to deal with, because it requires a great deal of labour in the way of cutting off the affected branches. Still, even under those circumstances, I think a little more industry and energy in the work would avail to keep it under control. There is no patent way, however, of getting over the trouble ; the old-fashioned way of cutting off the branches and cutting out the knots seems to be the only feasible plan yet. I think a solution of carbolic acid, perhaps, is as good as anything to apply for the purpose of destroying the spores that may be left in the branches of trees where the knot has been troublesome, and arresting their power of germination. A Memper.—Is there any perceptible indication of the disease before the bark opens ? : Prof. SaunpEers.—I don’t know of any way of detecting the presence of the disease until the bark opens, so that the knot has got a firm root on the tissues of the wood. Unless it would be possible to indicate in advance where the black knot will break out, I do not know any feasible method of prevention. The Memser.—Is there any danger of it spreading? I have seen lately, on the cherry trees of a man five miles back of me, swarms of them; the trees were literally covered with them. Some have told me there is a danger of it spreading to the apple trees. Prof. SaunpERs.—It has never been known to affect any trees other than the plum and cherry, and there is no probability of its spreading to the apple. The plum has been ‘most affected by it until within the last few years ; in fact, formerly it was regarded as distinct on the cherry, but closer investigation showed that the same form of fungus affected both varieties, and was capable of being transferred from one to the other. Why it has taken a particular liking to the cherry more than the plum is difficult to account for, but we know in many districts the trees are completely covered with black knot, especially the sour cherries. The only wise course to pursue when trees are past redemp- ‘tion is to cut them down and burn them, and plant fresh the next season. Mr. Denton.—Does black knot attack the nectarine and peach and stone fruit generally ? Prof. Saunpers.—I think there is no case on record of either the peach, apricot or nectarine being attacked. The Prestpent.—Have you heard of black knot in the wild hickory tree? I have seen it. ; Prof. SaunpErRs.—It is a distinct form, I think. Mr. Denron.—I had a nectarine growing in my garden, and after black knot had attacked the plums it took the nectarine, and [I lost the nectarine ; not that I claim it died with black knot, but still I found that the black knot had taken it. Prof. Pantoy.—In travelling through the country I have been astonished at finding so many trees completely covered with black knot. People don’t try this plan of cutting Can black knot be sufficiently controlled to make plum growing down, and some I have found who did cut away the affected limbs, threw them in the fence corners, which is simply a means of scattering it. There are no less than five different kinds of spores, three of which have been conclusively proved to produce black knot. It is a fungus which spreads with tremendous rapidity, and the best treatment is to cut it off. People don’t do that ; they ask for specific remedies for it, but will not apply what they are told to it. The best plan is to cut it off and burn it, because if you don’t burn it you are scattering spores by the million into the orchard. THE COLUMBIA PEAR. Question.— What do you think of the Columbia pear? I think it ought to be more extensively grown. It keeps with less care than any other variety, and longer after being ripe. I have thirty-six varieties on my place, and have a good chance to judge. I think the Columbia is as good as any variety i have, and more valuable on account of its coming in ripe at this season of the year. Mr. Dempsey.—I do not think it is much approved of in our section. It is very subject to blight, and I lost a quantity of them, though I am not prepared to say that it is more subject to it than other varieties. I have lost a large number of varieties. One of the pears I prefer is the Josephine de Malines ; I am willing to stop right there for a winter pear. Perhaps just at this point I had better tell you something of the way in which we enjoy it. We have them yet, and have had since the Ist of December. We take a small quantity of them for about two weeks in our living room, where the thermometer is from sixty to seventy, and they ripen up beautifully ; all that one could desire in a winter pear. Prof. SaunDERS.— My experience is very limited. There is one feature in regard to it generally understood—it is very slow in coming into bearing ; it requires many years growth before you get any fruit. Mr. Dempsey.—That is correct. Prof. Saunpers.—It is very good and useful when sufficiently far advanced. The PrestpENT.—We are all anxious to get returns as soon as possible, but the fact that a tree is somewhat tardy in bearing is not against it inthe ultimate result. In spite of that defect it is assuming quite a prominent position as a market variety, because when it does bear, it is good. One defect it has is that it is not large and somewhat inclined to drop off, especially in windy localities ; but even then, specimens two-thirds grown will ripen up and make very nice market fruit. I think as we have so few desirable satisfac- tory winter pears it would be well to plant this, at least moderately for market, as well as for other purposes. BEST MEANS OF DESTROYING THE CURCULIO. The best means of destroying the curculio, and the question, “ Are any varieties of plum curculio proof ?’ was next taken up for discussion. : Prof. SAuNDERs.—The old method of destroying them by jarring the tree and collect- ing the insects has been largely superseded in many districts by the use of Paris Green in the proportion of a teaspoonful of the poison te a pailful of water, kept in a constant state of agitation and sprayed on the foliage of the trees; in the first place, about the time when the blossoms are falling or the young fruit shooting, and then again in the course of two weeks, and sometimes making a third application. Most people, however, find two applications sufficient to overcome the difficulty. How the result is brought about I am not prepared to say, but it is said that curculio will not attack trees so treated to any material extent, and by this method as a rule, a crop of plums may be secured. Experi- ments have been tried—I think the President can tell you more about it than I can—by 59 taking alternate rows of trees, and treating one and leaving the other without. The results pointed very conclusively to the importance and practical usefulness of this method of treatment for curculio. In reference to varieties being curculio proof, there are certainly some varieties which seem to have in the texture of their integuments or the character of their pulp, some qualities which make it difficult for the curculio to deposit eggs, or if they are deposited, for the larva to feed on the fruit, and these varieties are more or less exempt; but they do not as a rule constitute the better class of plums and the most desirable varieties to grow. I think there are gentlemen here who know more about that than I do. The Secretary.—Do you think that the plan which has been tried by a certain writer would be at all likely to succeed? He says he has wound cotton batting around the trees for about a foot up from the ground, tied with pack thread, and as the curculio very seldom flies but climbs the tree, it finds great difficulty in climbing over this cotton. He says that trees so treated were exempt. Prof. SaunpERS.—I think the gentleman must be astray in his conclusions. The eurculio flies quite readily ; I have seen them fly at night as well asin the day time. I would like to know what means of locomotion from one orchard to another the curculio has if it does not fly? Ifyou plant a tree five miles from any other they will find their way to it, and unless they had some appliance for flying they would be a long time in walking the distance. I do not think that would give any greater security for the plum against curculio than it would to a cherry against robins. I do not think that remedy has any practical value. The PresipDENT.—Quite early in the history of peach planting on the west shore of the State of Michigan, one of our early planters set out quite an extensive orchard, with a natural growth of timber between that and another orchard quite a distance away.. He found he had no trouble in the spring, when they first commenced, until there was a wind from the direction of the other orchard, and then he had plenty of curculio. The idea must be that in some way a knowledge of the existence of this orchard had been conveyed through the atmosphere and they made a break in that direction, and I am quite sure they did it by flying. A neighbour of mine thought he had made a discovery—perhaps he had—of a process for driving them away by smoking the trees with coal tar and a little sulphur, doing it very thoroughly. The curculios left him, but when they found themselves getting short of pasture, that process did not answer the purpose ; they could stand a little of it. I doubt if all these experiments are not liable to that objection. Mr. Everetts.—Will Paris green injure the trees? A neighbour of mine, who is now dead, thought it hurt the trees. Prof. Saunpers.—I think there is no danger in using Paris green of the strength indicated, if the liquid is kept well agitated while being sprayed on the trees. Being a heavy powder, it will settle in the vessel if not constantly stirred’ I knew a gentleman who put a quarter of a pound to a barrel, and he complained to me that it had injured his trees very seriously, but on inquiry I found that he had used the water on the top, and when he came to the bottom had turned the whole quarter pound on a very few trees, which were very seriously damaged, of course. That, however, arose from his not having kept the mixture in a constant state of agitation. The trees upon which he had sprayed the water—the top of the barrel—were not affected in any way, not even the effect he expected of killing off the curculio, because the poison was not properly distributed, but all settled in the bottom. The Presipent.—Our district was for many years noted as a plum-growing district, but the plum growers became discouraged by the ravages of curculio and black knot, and for many years the plum crop was comparatively small. Now, however, they are going into plums again, and our crop the last two years has been enormous ; plums last year were actually a drug on the market. So far as black knot is concerned, we do not fear it much ; we merely cut it off. The curculio does not appear to have the same effect now ; it is either weakening or leaving us altogether. We have made use of Paris green for the destruction of the curculio for many years and find it very effectual, using it in the proportions indicated by Professor Saunders. We never found any difficulty in using it in those quantities, but if used stronger there is a danger of killing the tree. 60 Take a patent pailful of water to a teaspoonful of Paris green, mixing it with a cup in the water till it is a perfect liquid; keep it constantly stirred, and apply to the trees with a fine rose syringe. On full-grown trees, a pail will spray from six to ten trees. The first application should be made immediately after the blossom drops, when the young plum is formed, and the second about ten days afterwards. Even if the Paris green did destroy some of the fruit, it would have been of benefit to our trees this last year, for they were laden down so heavily that in many instances they were broken down com- pletely with their crop of fruit. I do not believe, like many, that the Paris green kills the insect, but I incline to think there is something in the odor of it that drives them away. I have examined very closely for the purpose of finding that out, but never could, though examining for that very purpose. So far as curculio proof plums are concerned, I do not think there is a plum at all that we can call actually curculio proof. There are varieties that seem to be so perfectly hard at the season of the year the curculio seeks them, that it does not seem to be able to insert its proboscis into the plum, or, if he can, the egg does not come to maturity. Such varieties as Yellow Egg, Coe’s Golden Drop and Moore’s Arctic, I have never found any trouble with at all, simply on account of the extreme hardness of the plum at the time of year the curculio carries on his operations. Mr. Ross.—I had the Arctic bearing last year, and it was full of curculio. Mr. Denton.—I have found that smoking has a good effect ; that making a fire of rubbish, especially old rags and a little tobacco, forces the curculio to leave the tree. Whether it kills it or not T am not able to say, but they will leave that bough and fly to some other. I have found curculio in the city in sugar barrels ; whether attracted by the sugar or not, I don’t know. I have made up my mind that they fly from place to place. Mr. Ross.—I was unfortunate in not being present when black knot was being discussed, and there is something in that connection that I would like to know. Last year I was invited to Dr. Riddell’s garden with a gentleman by the name of Everetts, I think. There were a great many nice trees affected, and we cut off one of the affected limbs and opened the part, and we found in it a grub. We then went through about a dozen, and found the same in all of them. Perhaps Prof. Saunders could tell us the insect that deposited that grub. Prof, SaunpErs.—The larva found in the black knot is that of the curculio, which frequently deposits its eggs on the knot, on which the larva appears to have the faculty of feeding and thriving as perfectly as on,the plum itself. This has given rise to the impression that the black knot was caused hy this insect, whereas it has merely taken up the knot as a place of residence. In regard to what Mr. Denton has said, anything that imparts a foreign odour to the plum tree seems to throw the curculio off his track. No doubt insects have some sense of smell, by which they detect particular trees which bear the fruits they are looking for—something analagous to our own sense of smell, but far more acute. I know in many instances the insertion of elder branches, which have a strong odour, among the branches of the plum has protected the crop from curculio, which can only be explained by the insect having been thrown off its scent ; it has come to the conclusion that it cannot be a plum tree on account of the odour. The different plans of smoking the tree seem to be explainable in the same way, and all have their value ; but you can understand that where one has an orchard of five hundred or a thousand trees, to kindle a fire and smoke each one thoroughly would be a rather tedious undertaking, and in that case Paris green would be a much more practicable remedy. Anyone who has only a few trees may adopt any of these methods with a certain amount of success. A Memsper.—Would the introduction of wild plums into the orchard be of any benefit, on account of their superior attractiveness, to curculio ? A. M. Smita.—They would be very liable to introduce black knot, which is worse. Prof. SaunpErs.—I do not think it would be of any avail. The number of curculio in any district is something not easily determined, and if you offer special attractions for them they will no doubt come to the entertainment. I don’t think it would be wise to plant wild plum trees with that object ; I don’t think the insects would confine themselves to the wild trees. 61 THE SPOT ON THE APPLE. The following paper was contributed by S. P. Morse, of Milton: The following observations are local, mainly confined to one orchard. An apple so diseased as not to be fit for shipping is put down as a total loss, for no man can make a living at growing culls. Early Harvest, Fameuse, Rambo and Dominie, 100 per cent. or total loss; Yellow Bellflower, 50 per cent.; Northern Spy, 30 per cent. ; Rhode Island Greening, Ladies’ Sweet, Twenty-Ounce and Fall Pippin, 20 per cent.; Tallman Sweet, Spitzenberg and Sweet Bough, 10 per cent. Some other slightly affected varieties exempt from spot, were: Duchess Oldenberg, Baldwin, Fall Orange, Maiden’s Blush, Fallawater, Grimes’ Golden, King of Tomkins Oounty, Ribston Pippin, Red Canada and all the Russets, as also all the Crabs and some seedlings on trial. ' I observed that wherever the fruit was attacked the leaf blight was present, though not always in equal degree ; that shade, cold and damp seemed to encourage the growth of fungus; and, that thin-skinned fruits appeared more liable to its attacks than the thick-skinned. The influence of sun and shade respectively was very clearly proved in the case of the Fameuse, where closely planted or crowded. Taking my stand on the south or south-east side, the fruit appeared well coloured and fair, though small. Go to the opposite side, and a mass of withered, black and frowning faces looked complainingly down. A Fameuse that happened to stand by itself on a bold shoulder of a high hill looking square in the face of Boreas, was loaded with small, clean fruit. Yet the leaf was somewhat injured, the probable cause of the small size of the fruit. The Spy and Bellflower were most affected at the calyx, so likewise the Twenty-Ounce. These varieties hang pendent from twigs, which averts the calyx from the light and retains any wet that may gather on the apple about it. Some varieties, such as the Westfield Seek-no-further and Swaar dropped nearly all thin fruit, but did not spot. Such varieties as did this exhibited most damage to the foliage, as a rule. I have not the means of proving whether this is a new or old enemy, as A. J. Downing fifty years ago mentioned the “spot” on the Fall Pippin. It is certain that the clearing of the country of forests and some cosmical changes have caused considerable climatic changes, sufficient it may be to render our present climate unfriendly to many of our old, and till late, hardy kinds. Some time ago I called the attention of the Horticulturist to the fact that in this region all the black ash on high and low lands alike,—trees of second growth as well as those a hundred years old,—are dead ; they died almost in a day, in the last of May, 1885. A little to the north and west of this locality, hundreds of apple trees and nearly all the better class of plums and cherries of all kinds have yielded to the destroyer or the changes the diseases produce by the changes and the sudden vicissitudes so trying to all living things. Every variety may be said to have its habitat in which it attains its highest possible develop- ment. Whatever changes the conditions which go to create this habitat, if destroyed, destroys the adaptation, produces a retrograde movement and decay. Some other facts and suggestions present themselves, but I have already made this paper longer than I intended. At some future time, when I shall have further verified my observations, I _ may submit the results, if desired. A paper on the same subject by John Croil, of Aultsville, was also read, as follows : The above being one of the subjects for discussion at our winter meeting, which I will be unable to attend, I venture a few remarks, as the disease seems to be worse in our district than in most places. I speak rather feelingly on the subject, as my orchard (which my neighbours were pleased to call one of the best, if not the best in these counties) is entirely ruined. The trees are the picture of health. The fruit, mostly Fameuse, I had no difficulty in selling afew years ago at a dollar a bushel ; this year and last, it failed to repay the expense of gathering. No doubt the spot is, as you say, a species of fungus, but we have failed to find either the cause or the cure. Some seem to think the disease will run itself out. The 62 ee eee ee chances of that seem to be very few. -A disease which has gone on increasing for a quarter of a century or more, and which is reported from all quarters to be worse now than ever it was, is a stubborn one. In the annual report of our association for 1869, p. 71, is the following, being a report of the fruit crop in the County of Lincoln :—The “black spot,” as it is called, is worse than ever known before, especially on the Early Joe, Early Harvest and Golden Sweet, which are nearly worthless. Almost all varieties are more or less affected by it. The Red Astracan, Rambo, Jersey Sweet, White Juneating, Dutch Mignonne, Duchess of Oldenberg, Gravenstein, Baldwin, Spitzenberg, Northern Spy, Swaar and Seek-no- further are slightly touched by it; whilst the Ribston Pippin, Newtown Pippin, King of Tompkins County, Roxbury and Golden Russet, especially the latter, are good. Of the above apples the same thing might be said to-day. The workings of the disease have been very puzzling. If it is in the soil or the atmosphere, what change has come over these to produce and continue it? Orchards we have here, within a few miles of us, grafted fruit, with soil and situation seemingly very similar to ours, all of them like ours close to the St. Lawrence, bearing fruit very little spotted, of kinds the same and alike cultivated. Within the distance named and under similar circumstances, @ neighbour of mine has a large orchard planted the same year as mine (1869.) This year his Fameuse, like mine, were badly spotted ; his Tallmans were free from spot. Mine, which were not affected till now, were this year as badly spotted as the Fameuse. In rare cases we come across trees of Fameuse very lightly affected ; these almost invariably are on sandy soil. Ours is a clay loam. At one of our meetings I showed Mr. Dempsey a sample of my Wealthy apples, and to my inquiry what apple it was, he replied, if it was not spotted he would say it was the Wealthy. It was the Wealthy, and from reports I gave you in the December number of the Horticulturist, you will see that it does not sustain its character of being entirely free from spot. I hope I may be wrong when I say I fear it will not remain on the spot free- list. The American Golden Russet has never been known to spot in our district. I might almost club the Duchess with it, but would have trouble to name a third. I never saw a tree subject to the spot recover, and as apples spotted to any extent will not pay the expense of growing, barely of gathering, I believe in the advice given us in the January Horticuliwrist. Cut them down and burn them is sound, and just such as I have given to others, but to me it’s like drawing teeth, very unpalatable. I hope the discussion on the subject may bring good results. The SECRETARY.—I was somewhat surprised to find the Newtown Pippin classed as - almost free, and that the Golden Sweet was subject to spot in the County of Lincoln. I have known the latter for a number of years, and it is almost entirely free. I feel so much interest in this question that I must ask you to allow me to make a few remarks also. We begin to feel that this is one of the most serious questions in regard to the future of our apple culture that can be brought up. I am very hopeful that discussions on this matter may be helpful to us, because I am certain that unless we can either find varieties proof against this spot, or some remedy for the spot itself, we shall have to give up apple culture. Its course with us has been somewhat as follows. It began in the Snow apple, in which I think I noticed the first signs about 1870, and in our section of the country it is now utterly useless. The apples are becoming smaller every year and we are cutting down our trees or else top-grafting them. The Fall Pippin is another of the same kind, and its history is the same, but with it, instead of getting smaller, the apples are fewer in number; we do not get a crop on more than half our trees. Some years ago, in 1874, we shipped a car load of them at a time in one season, but now we never get more than twenty or thirty barrels of apples off the same trees. I am sorry to say it is also coming on the Greening, which has been referred to by our President as one of the apples now gaining favour in the markets of the old country. They have been worthless, especially in the older orchards, for the last three or four years, and not only worthless but the crop has been very much decreased. 63 The Rambo is one of the worst, it is as bad as the Snow, and another apple that I am - very sorry to see beginning to be affected is the Northern Spy. There are a few on the table, just put there to show you how the spot is beginning to affect them; at the calyx end you will see how it affects them. I have planted a large orchard of these apples, and it disappoints me very much. The Spitzenberg does not show so plainly, but it has ceased to bear a profitable crop. The Early Harvest is another of the very worst ; almost as bad as the Snow. The Baldwin has not been a good cropper for the last three or four years, and I am inclined to attribute it to the same cause, although it does not show this scab to the same extent. The new apple, the Wallbridge, I have not fruited, but I noticed in the last Montreal report that it is subject to the spot. Altogether only a few varieties are free with us. The American Golden Russett is clear and beautiful, and the Graven- stein might be classed on the free list. The Red Astrachan is clean and the Duchess of Oldenburg is one of the very finest. The King apple is scarcely affected at all, and the Mann is clear. The Alexander also I think might be put upon the free list. The Wealthy has the reputation of being free, and the Ribston Pippin is one of the very best —perfectly free from spot. President Lyon.—Has anyone had any experience or made any investigation with reference to the time when this disease originates. I think very littleis generally known on the subject, and I think it is very important that this shonld be learned if we are to devise any means of arresting it. I suspect from the little observation I have made on the subject that it appears very early after the fruit begins to swell, if not early after the blossom. Prof. Panton.—It is said to be froma very early period of the apple’s existence, from the time it is as small as a pea, President Lyon.—I might add that there seems to be seasons when the disease dis- appears entirely, even on the varieties most affected ; that is, the Snows sometimes come out perfectly bright and clear, while most seasons they are entirely ruined. Prof. SaunpDErs.—I have observed the spot on very small apples, before they are the size of a hickory nut, and there is no doubt it attacks the fruit very soon after it is formed. President Lyon has pointed to a very important matter, and that is the character of the season and its influence on the spot. This last year, in the Province of Quebec, spot has prevailed to an extent never before known, and that may perhaps account for the adverse account of the Wallbridge, to which the Secretary has just referred. Heretofore there has been no difficulty in obtaining large quantities of Fameuse apples near Montreal, almost if not entirely free from spot, but this last year I had the greatest difficulty in getting a few bushels to send to the Oolonial Exhibition. Every grower told me that he had never had such an experience before, it resulted in the almost entire destruction of their crops, as far as the markets were concerned. It is to be hoped the thing will pass away there as readily as it has come to them, althongh it is to be feared they may be troubled in this matter for some years tc come. The Secretary.—lIt rather increases than diminishes with us, and never entirely disappears. ' Prof. SaunDERS.—It seems to be worse some years than others ; this last season has been much worse than any ever known before. Prof. Panton.— What kind of a season has it becn ? Prof. SaunpERs.—I have been away most of it, and have had no opportunity of judging. Ata late meeting of the vine growers in France the subject of mildew on grapes was investigated by scientific men, and some very useful information was conveyed to the public on the use of a mixture of sulphate of copper and lime as a deterrent for mildew, and it might possibly be worth testing in regard to the fungus on the apple. A paper was read at the meeting of the Western New York Fruit Growers’ Association on this subject, in which was given the proportions used. I took them down, but I don’t happen to have it with me, and cannot give the proportions from memory, but the sulphate of copper is dissolved in water, in the smallest possible quantity, and the lime is taken and slacked, and exposed to the air in a fine powder, and the solution of sulphate of copper added to the lime, and the whole mixture dried in the sun. It was tested on the grapes and they have had wonderful results. I think it is a thing well worth trying. It not 64 only kept the vine free from mildew, but had the effect of invigorating the plant so that it has held its foliage very late in the season, and retained its dark green colour. The SEcRETARY.—Some of you, will remember, perhaps, Professor Saunders recom- mending us to experiment on the apple spot by spraying with a solution of sulphur and water, and also, I believe, among other remedies, the use of a solution of hypo-sulphite of soda. I tried the sulphur very faithfully, but could not find the slightest difference in the trees that were sprayed. I am sorry I did not try the other, as I believe others have met with a measure of success in using it, and in the last report of the New York experi- mental station, Professor Arthur, of Geneva, gives his experiences initsuse. The quantity he used was one pound to ten gallons of water, and he syringed half of each tree with it, making applications on the 6th of May, the 9th of May, and the 15th of May, with the following result. The proportion of uninjured fruit on the syringed part of the trees was greater than on the other, and the fruit was also superior in size, and he adds, which makes it very practicable for us, it may be applied at the same time the spraying with Paris green is done ; it can be mixed with the Paris green and water when spraying the trees for codlin moth. - I would suggest that fruit growers should make the experiment this summer. I am going to try it, “for I think it is a very important thing. I hope science will come to our aid, and rid us of this very serious disease. Prof. SAuNDERS.—Some chemicals are very expensive, but this happens to be a very cheap one. Mr. Dempsey.—We had very few first-class apples this year on account of the spot, but if the same remedy will destroy apple spot that will destroy mildew, I am satisfied it can be quite easily accomplished. We find that a simple application of sulphur on grape vines when they are beginning to start their growth is quite sufficient to make a nice, clean crop. Throw the sulphur on the ground, or so it scatters on the ground, and we find that we have no mildew, even in the varieties most prone to it. We have also found it very efficacious to apply sulphate of iron sown broad-cast over the soil. When this was done we found no difficulty with our grapes. I don’t know whether this will agree with the scientific developments of Professors Saunders and Panton, but it occurs to me that there is a possibility of destroying apple spot by an application of either sulphate of iron or sulphate of copper. Prof. SaunpeRs.—In this paper to which I have referred the effect of the different substances was indicated by black lines, showing what proportion of success had attended these different methods by illustrating the relative good done. Sulphate of iron made a very short line indeed on this scale. In these experiments in France sulphur also failed to come up to the expectations formed, but this mixture of sulphate of copper and lime filled up the scale, indicating that they were almost entirely successful in stemming the virulence of this disease. I think at the same time that we should test everything likely to prove of service. The action of sulphate of iron may not be the same on the apple as on the grape, and therefore both should be experimented with. Mr. Dempsey.—Could the sulphate of copper not be safely used mixed with Paris green in spring for the codlin moth and syringed on the tree at the same time, as soon as we discover fruit on the apple trees ? Prof. SaunpEerRs.—I have had no personal experience ; I am merely reporting what I have heard second-hand, and in these experiments the sulphate of copper when used alone did not give half as good results as it did when lime was associated with it, and the opinion of the French chemists was that there was some combination between the lime and sulphate of copper which made them more effective when used in combination than where sulphate of copper was used in solution by itself. Prof. Panron.—Of the three mixtures spoken of, sulphur, sulphate of iron and the sulphate of copper and lime, the latter, as has been said by Prof. Saunders, gave the most favourable results in the experiments made by the French chemists. Mr. Dempsey tells us that where he scattered sulphur on the plant and the soil he has found satisfactory results. If that is an established fact it is worth following up by others, so as to make it still more definite. I can imagine that the fumes arising from the formation of sulphurous acid as the sulphur is acted. upon by the sun and atmosphere, would be death to these mildews. I would not have so much faith on the subject of iron, but of course all of these things 65 have to be judged by the results. I could understand better and be more in favour of the sulphate of copper and lime, because there the lime may take hold of the oxide and a certain amount of acid be evolved. I am inclined to favour this mixture of sulphate of copper and lime nfore than pure sulphate of iron. I don’t doubt sulphate of iron and lime might be tried. The Prestpent.—I can corroborate Mr. Dempsey in regard to sulphur on grapes. I used it for several varieties of my grapes that were affected by mildew. I was in the habit of sprinkling the sulphur upon the vine, but for the last three or four years I have practised scattering the sulphur—which, as I think Mr. Dempsey said, is a very cheap ‘ssubstance—all over the soil under the vinery, and I find no difticulty in any of the varie- ties we have ; no mildew at all. I havea perfectly clean crop of Concords, and even of the Burnet, which used to mildew all over. So far as mildew in the grape is concerned we have got fairly rid of it, and I believe with Mr. Dempsey that by following this up in the same way with other substances, we may attain the end we have in view. . Mr. Ross.—I have two hundred grape vines, and I never saw mildew on one of ‘them. The PresipENT.—This is the County of Kent, you must remember. Mr. Dempsey.—I know a recipe for destroying mildew on the grape. Puta certain quantity of lime in a bottle, and when syringing the vines put in a certain quantity of this liquid. I have known that remedy to clear them perfectly ina vinery. It is a theory I got from an English person. A Memser.—lIt is a good, practical remedy. Throw some lime and sulphur in the same pot. We used to have proportions to mix it, but that is not necessary ; nearly equal parts, or a little more lime or sulphur, it does not matter. After boiling for a few hours the liquid is put away in a jug to be used in small quantities. The PresipEnt.—These remedies sometimes fail when applied by simple spraying without force, and succeed under other circumstances. We can hardly judge of the preparations spoken of unless we know the circumstances under which they are applied. I have known cases in which preparations intended to destroy insects have failed when applied without much force, but succeeded admirably when sufficient force was given to thoroughly permeate the whole surface. The SEcrEtTARY.—A question was handed in which I reserved, to be dealt with under this head : “ Will it pay to spray apple trees with Paris green for codlin moth?” I sup- pose I may answer that from experience. It certainly does pay, and pay well. Formerly, when we did not use it, we were becoming discouraged, as we now are with the spot, and began to feel that if things went on like that we should find apple culture unprofitable. Tam sure that some years I have had to throw out fully one-third of my apples on account of codlin moth, and that is a serious consideration. But since we have used Paris green I don’t think there is one barrel in ten, perhaps in twenty ; so it pays very well indeed, and the labour is not very great. . The PrestpENt.— What is your proportion, and how is it used ? The SecRETARY.—My plan is to use one horse and a market waggon. Some use two horses, but I find one answers as well. At first horses are very much afraid when you begin to use the pump; it is rather terrifying to them. I use a pump similar to Field’s force pump, made at Oakville. I use a coal-oil barrel, which answers the purpose very well indeed, to which I attach the pump and screw it down fast in the head, in which also a little opening is left through which to pour in the water, the whole arrangement being securely tied to the waggon by four ropes, one at each corner. I first mix up the Paris green well with a smaller quantity of water and put this in the barrel, and then pouring in the rest, pail after pail, will mix it most thoroughly. Of course I have a stick for stirring it up every iittle while and keeping it well in suspension. Two men will go over a large area of ground in a day with this arrangement, By having it mounted in a ‘waggon you can reach pretty high trees. I have tried it in a truck or stone-boat, which answers for young trees, but in a waggon you can reach the top of quite large trees, and the spray is distributed beautifully fine all over them. Prof. Panton.—How many ordinary trees could be syringed with one barrel ? The Secretary.—Twenty-five or thirty. 5 (E.G.) 66 Prof. SAunDERS.— How much Paris green to the barrel ? The SecreTaRy.—Three ounces to fifty gallons of water. I was rather careful, because I found that injurious results followed sometimes from using as much as four ounces to the barrel. : A MemsBer.—How often did you go over them ? ‘The SecreTary.—Sometimes not more than once. unless there happened to be a heavy rain shortly after using it. The PresipENT.—At what time do you apply it ? The SecreTaRy.— Almost as soon as the apples are formed, while they are still stand- ing upright. Prof. SaunpERs.—Did you find it cleared away the canker worm as well ? The Secretary.—lI did; we have been a good deal troubled with canker worm, and at one time it was a question how to get rid of it; but I find the Paris green quite effectual in that way. I may state also that I have tried London purple and found it. quite as effective as Paris green as far as I have noticed of it. It certainly mixes with the water better, but I found that injury resulted also from the use of it too strong, and have not used as strong a solution as is reeommended by some. I found one-third of a pound to forty or fifty gallons to be sufficient. A Memper.—!Is there any brand we can be sure of ? Prof. SauNDERS.—Owing to the demand for a cheap article Paris green is often adulterated. Paris green will dissolve entirely in ammonia, and if you have any sample of doubtful purity take as much as will lie on a five cent piece and put it in a bottle of ammonia. If it leaves a white powder at the bottom you may be sure it is not Paris green. When Paris green is pure it is uniform in its action, and always contains about the same proportion of arsenic. London purple is quite a different thing, it is a waste powder that arose in the manufacture of aniline dyes, in which arsenic is one of the important constituents ; and formerly the manufacturers were obliged to send it out into mid-ocean and dump it to prevent any danger of bad effects. upon the community. There is no uniformity or stability about it; it is a mixture of arsenic and lime in variable proportions, some times twice as strong as at others, and for that reason I never recommend its use. You may get good results in two or three instances, and on using the same quantity next time you;will find the foliage of your trees or plants injured. I think when you know of a remedy that is safe, and uniform in its. action, it is not wise to change for one less uniform in its results. Mr. DempsEy.—With respect to the use of a nozzle for spraying trees, I believe I use one a little cheaper than any other [{ have ever seen used. It requires a little practice to use it properly, but I find it much more satistactory than anything else I have met with. We simply unscrew the patent nozzle and throw it away, and by clapping a finger over the ring of the nozzle I can arrange the spray just as I like ; it only requires a little practice. You can arrange to increase the force of your pump by throwing a smaller spray, or throw it larger and spread it further if you wish, just to suit the circumstances. And just here is another point, perhaps I use a more powerful pump than most people do, a three inch cylinder pump, which will throw water thirty feet high quite easily. When the poison is thrown up so that it descends like rain it generally strikes about. all the fruit that is standing erect, and 1 find it has the best effects upon the fruit. Prof. SAUNDERS.—While on my feet I intended to have referred to one more of the exact experiments that had been tried in regard to the effect of Paris green upon the codlin moth and cut worm. Professor Forbes, of Champagne, Lllinois, two years ago in- stituted a series of careful experiments, taking alternate trees of the same varieties of fruits and spraying one end leaving the other unsprayed ; keeping a record of the number of times they were sprayed and all particulars, and submitting each apple from each tree to a careful examination. The results, as far as I can give them from memory, were that about three-quarters of the crop was preserved by the use of Paris green on alternate: trees. It is the only very exact experiment I know of that has been carried on. They may be repeated in another county with better results. The SecreTARY.—I noticed the result of an experiment at the New York station. They used Paris green on the 3rd, 5th and 17th of June, and the result was that of the: 67 trees sprayed thirteen per cent. were wormy, and of those not sprayed thirty-five per cent. I would iike to bring up the question of kerosene emulsion, to see if any light can be thrown on that. I tried it last year on some apples and cherry trees, but without much success, perhaps because I did not use the correct proportions. I only used one gallon of kerosene to half a pound of soap and forty gallons of water, I find that Prof. Riley recommends two gallons of kerosene for the same amount. Of course I mixed it hot, got the soap and water boiling and put the kerosene in afterwards, and «churned it up thoroughly in barrels. I suppose my lack of success must have been owing to my not having used enough kerosene. Prof. SaunpDERs.—Did you churn the kerosene with the whole quantity of water ! The Secretary.—Afterwards ; I mixed it first in the pot. I used one gallon of ‘kerosene, half a pound of soap, and forty gallons of water. Mr. Evererts.—In regard to nozzles, I have done a good deal of spraying, and the best nozzle I have ever had yet is one in which the water comes out with a twist, and you can gauge it in spraying by turning a thumbscrew. I have seen it advertised in the American Agricultwrist, and they keep them in the hardware stores. You can arrange to spray the whole side of the tree almost. I do not remember the name of it. The Secretary.—lIs not there a half moon ? Mr. Everetts.—No, it is just like a shut-off tap. As you turn one way it shuts off the water entirely, and the other way a straight stream. The Secretary.—The cyclone nozzle is arranged with both a round and a half moon aperture, and by these you can regulate the stream of spray to any size you please. THE APHIS ON CHERRY LEAVES. The next subject taken up for discussion was, “The Aphis on Cherry Leaves ; Extent of the Plague, and best means of checking it.” The Secretary.—I have had some experience, but I am afraid it is not worth any- thing, because it was unsuccessful. It was the application I have just been describing, a kerosene emulsion, which I tried upon ths cherry trees. It did not remove the aphis and we suffered very badly with it ; indeed our trees were covered with them last season, and the cherries were largely unfit for shipping. The leaves were just black with them, and although in former years we have had the same plague we never had it so terribly bad as last season. I was very anxious to destroy the aphis, but I suppose owing to the fact that I did not put in enough kerosene to make it thoroughly effective I failed. I shall try it again, however. The PresipENT.—Did you try carbolic acid ? The Secretary.—No, sir. Prof. Saunpers.—I cannot throw very much light on this question. My oppor- tunities of testing remedies have not been very great in that line, as the few trees I have grown have not been badly affected, and the birds which feed on them have made a point of getting ahead of the aphis. The evidence which has been accumulating, however, in ' regard to kerosene emulsions, points to their being useful, to put it very mildly, for the aphis. They have been tried for the apple aphis and in many instances found beneficial, and would probably be so also for the cherry. The Presipent.—I have tried carbolic acid. I was just going from home when it appeared, and the trees were perfectly covered with it when I heard of it. I told the man in charge to make a mild solution of carbolic acid and apply it with a syringe, and one application of it cleared thé trees most completely. I don’t know what the strength was; I told him to have it mild enough so it would not injure the trees. It did not injure the trees, but it cleaned off the aphides and we saw nothing more of them. Mr. EvEeretts.—In 1885 they were very thick in my district ; and not only they, but another insect which eat away the fleshy part of the under side of the leaf of my Richmond cherry trees. Prof. SaunpERs.—That is a slug, a slimy-looking thing—the pear tree or cherry tree slug. Hellebore or Paris green will get rid of that entirely. 68 The SrecreTary.—What would be the proper amount of carbolic acid to use in water ? Prof. SaunpERs.—The proportion of about an ounce to a quart. The PresipEnT.—I don’t think my man used so much as that. Prof. SauNDERS.—It varies so much in its strength in commerce ; it depends upon whether you get the higher grades or the crude acid, which is a different chemical. You would have to know what grade of the acid was used before you could advise as to the proportions. The SrcreTary.—I have used it for the aphis on the rose. Mr. Beati.—I was going to ask if you used crystals. Of course I am not a chemist, but, as I understand it, it is in a crystal state, and there is crude carbolic acid, which is a heavy fluid. I used that, and I could not use a quarter of an ounce in a gallon but what it would burn up the foliage. Prof. SaunpERS.—My remarks apply to the higher grades, in the crystal state. Mr. Beaty.—You would not recommend the crude acid ? Prof. SaunpERS.—No, not for purposes such as we are now discussing. The clear acid—or sometimes it is a little pink—1is the most convenient form to use, and should be used. It is ordinarily sold for chemical purposes. The Presment.—I fancy that would be the kind my man used. President Lyon.—I had a row of forty or fifty young cherry trees attacked by the slug, and after a day or two found two hundred upon them. Being in haste I applied road dust right then, and on returning next day found only half a dozen, or perhaps a dozen left on the whole row. I tried it a second time, and that was the last of them. They certainly did not get away in any other way than being destroyed by the sand in each case. There is no doubt of the success of the Professor’s plan, but sometimes it is troublesome to go to the expense and labour of preparing chemical solutions, and the road dust or sand will actually effect the object. We have found no necessity for more than one or two applications. Prof. ‘SauNDERS.—Your experience does not correspond with that I had. I used to have an abiding faith in this road dust remedy, but after several applications I found it did not give the result expected. I thought I would try an experiment, and I took the branch of a pear tree that was badly affected by slugs, counted the number of slugs, and kept a record of them. I then took some road dust and was very careful to pepper each one all over with the dust, and then tied up the branch so that the birds could not get at it to pick off the slugs. On going back the next day, or two days after, I forget which, I found that the slugs had crawled out of this covering of sand and dirt and were feeding away as before on the leaves of the trees. I am not quite sure whether the number was at all diminished or not, but certainly not to any extent that would warrant me in includ- ing this as a remedy. I tried a second application on the same insects, and on visiting them again found they had crawled out a second time, and I thought if they could do that it was not worth while to pursue the experiment any further, as far as the practical out- come was concerned. These insects went on and completed their growth as if nothing had happened. I came to the conclusion that road dust acts mechanically by covering the slimy coats of the insects with a heavy weight, which causes them to roll off the tree. When it is thrown on with considerable force a large proportion of them would be dis- lodged, but while I would not like to be understood as disapproving the remedy, I do not think it is one which can be relied upon to succeed every time. I think it depends very largely upon the way in which it is applied. A Memper.—Have you seen air-slacked lime applied ? Prof. Saunpers.—No, but I understand it has been used very effectually ; but it is an unpleasant thing to use. Mr. Smita.—I effectually rid my trees of a large quantity by sprinkling with anleached ashes and hellebore, in the proportion of a handful of hellebore to a peck of ashes. Prof. SaunpErs.—The hellebore alone would have done it. Mr. Breatu.—I have used air-slacked lime on cherry trees. I did it for two years, and it only required one application each year to perfectly effect my object, but on applying 69 pn ee a Sn ee ee Ee it the third year I found it almost worthless. I began to think over the matter the next day. I could not make it out how it was, and then I remembered I had made a mistake in the time of putting it on. On the third occasion I had put it on early in the morning, when there was a heavy dew, and it had little effect. After this third time I applied it in the middle of the day, when it was hot and dry, and the next day after that application there was not a slug to be seen. It requires to be put on during the heat of the day, when everything but the slug itself is dry. Mr. Hvuccarp.—About six years ago I found it affecting not only the cherry and pear trees, but also the mountain ash as well. Lime was the only available thing I could get at the time, and I tried it in the morning with no satisfactory results, but in the middle of the day, or any time when the foliage is quite dry, it kills them every time in a couple or three hours. We have applied it for the last three or four years. It is easily applied ; anyone can sprinkle it on, and I will guarantee it a good cure. Mr. Beatt.—I might say that people think the application is objectionable if there is much wind, but by getting on the windward side of the tree and throwing it high, no _ unpleasant results will follow, Prof. SauNpERs.—Supposing there is no wind ? Mr. Breatu.—I throw it up. Prof. SAunpERs.—Do you run away then ? Mr. Beatt.—Oh, no; there is always wind enough if you keep on the windward side. Mr. Hucearp.—If you make a little trowel out of a shingle and throw it up mto the tree it will spread it quite effectually. President Lyon.—There is a little experience I had with pear trees which may be useful. Some years ago I had thirty or forty varieties of pear trees planted, two or three of each kind, planted in a row adjacent to each other. Some of these had very glossy foliage and the others quite the reverse. I had occasion to pass through them three times a day during the period at which the slug makes its appearance, and I made it my busines to look out for them. During the whole season I failed to discover a single slug on any of the glossy foliaged trees, while the others were invariably attacked. I applied the remedy of which I have already spoken every time I passed through, and I had no diffi- culty in keeping them almost entirely under subjection. They always appeared upon the varieties with the rough foliage. Prof. SAuNDERS.— What varieties ? President Lyon.—An old variety, called the Louise Bonne de Jersey. Prof. SauNDERS.—We suffered very much in the vicinity of London. I know my _ pear orchard was as if a fire had passed through it when I came back, I was astonished ; nearly the entire foliage of the orchard was gone. Out of something like a 100 varieties I could not observe any difference in their liability to its attack. President Lyon.—I guess if they had been driven to it they might have attacked the smooth trees with me, but they had plenty of pasture in the others. The PresipENt.—My experience in regard to road dust tallies with that of President Lyon. I have used road dust, and find it very effectual in dry weather when the slug is to be found in large numbers on the trees. I have once in a while thrown in alittle dry wood ashes with the dust, but generally have taken just the road dust alone. POINTS TO BE OBSERVED IN JUDGING FRUIT. Mr. Beatu.—The question I propose is, by what standard shall we judge fruit or apples. My reason for taking this question up was because of the difficulty which exists at our township and county fairs in judging, or rather the evil results of the judgments given there. I have seen so much of this at different places that I have come to the con- clusion that it is almost like a lottery ; no man can have any idea before hand of what the results will be, no matter how good his fruit may be he is never certain of receiving ar er ri i 70 a prize, simply because the taste of one or more of the judges differs from his own, and for the same reason the prize often goes to inferior fruit. I am speaking more par- ticularly, of course, of the small societies, the township societies, where only a few prizes are offered. For instance, a prize is offered for the best variety of winter apples, the best plate of winter apples. Well, I remember one instance in which there was an excellent plate of Russets on the table, and another of Talman Sweets, which got the prize as being the best winter apple on the table, and I have seen other cases just as erroneous in my judgment. I saw two of the judges in that case afterwards, and asked them their reasons for giving such a judgment. They said the Talman Sweet was just as large and better, and in their judgment they thought nothing was equal to the Talman Sweet. If there was a standard established by this association or some other body having authority mor- ally, to which they could refer and see that one must be judged by a higher standard than another, I think it would havea better effect. We know that at large fairs the numerical system has been almost altogether adopted, but at small places people don’t know any- thing about that. I think every apple should have a numerical value, for different purposes. For instance, an apple might be valued at say ten for a dessert apple, but for market purposes only five or six, and soon. I think it would prove of great advan- tage if a standard were established by this association, and the judges in small places would be greatly aided by it in the performance of their duties. Mr. Wetiineton.—I don’t think any standard would be of much service to judges who would make such a judgment as that described by Mr. Beall. The only effectual standard in that case would be to turn them out and appoint better men. As to our establishing a standard as to numbering, I don’t see how it is to operate. In the case say of winter apples, there might be a plate of what we would consider inferior winter apples that would be graded as two, anda very much superior plate very much less, and in that way you could not give justice to one which might be graded for a particular purpose. I think the judging of fruit depends a good deal upon the men who are selected as judges, who should be men having a practical knowledge of fruit ; then they will not run to the largest apple, but will have some knowledge of an apple’s value as a shipper or keeper or dessert apple, or whatever purpose it may be used for, and will look to colouring and average size, and not monstrosity. That is my idea of judging; I don’t think we could benefit a judge by setting up any numerical standard. The PresipENtT.—I have had considerable experience in regard to this matter, both here and across the line, in judging fruits, and ] have always adopted as one particular point in judging any fruits, to take into consideration the commercial value of each variety presented. I think that is a point which should never be forgotten in judging apples or any other fruit. In coming to a conclusion, take into consideration in the first place, the correct or incorrect naming of the varieties. The judge is supposed to he a practical man who knows the most possible about each variety, and what a perfect sample of each variety should be. He takes up an apple off a plate, and looks at it to see if, in his judgment, it is a perfect sample of its variety ; or, if it is not, how far below that does it fall, judging all points ranging from one to five, or one to ten, if you please. Give the proper number of points to each variety, and, adding up the whole, give the prize to the collection receiving the largest number of points. tn awarding these points, the general points that each apple should have, in order to be a perfect variety or sample, should be taken into consideration. Then take into consideration the commercial value. For instance, those varieties having the highest commercial value will have a chance of the prize, even if the samples themselves are not quite up to the mark as some other col- lection consisting of varieties not so valuable in the general markets. The collection having a large number of winter apples stands a better chance, as a rule, of the prize, than one made up largely of summer and fall apples, which are not commercially so valuable as the others for general cultivation. Mr, Everetrs.—lI think it would give judges a better chance if one were for packing. another shipping, another cooking, and so on. 71 THE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF GRAPE GROWING. At the opening of the afternoon session the following paper was read by A. M. Smith, of St. Catharines : The cultivation of grapes, if not practised by the antediluvians, was one of the first industries of which we have any record after the flood, and from that time to the present it has been in many parts of the world one of the most important, and it has furnished one of the most healthful articles of sustenance known to civilized man, and though many, like Noah who planted the first vineyard, have imbibed too freely of the fermented juice of the vine, and like him have shamefully exposed themselves, it still remains, when properly used, the most beautiful, Iucious and healthful fruit that God has given us. Though, by the way, I have heard it argued by a distinguished divine, that Noah did not get drunk because his wine was fermented, but his grandson, Canaan, wanted to have a little fun and drugged the old gentleman, hence the curse that he pronounced upon Canaan. Be that as it may, we know that the proper use of the grape always brings health and enjoyment, while the improper use brings worse curses upon the human race than were ever pronounced upon Canaan. I have often thought it would be interesting to know more of the methods of propa- gation, culture and varieties of the grapes grown by the ancients; whether Noah raised his vineyard from seeds or cuttings preserved from the flood, the distance apart he planted, and whether he trained to stakes or trellis, and whether they were all one variety or not. There can be no doubt of the superior size and productiveness of ancient grapes when we read of the famous grapes of Eshcol, and from what we know of the climate there and the varieties at present produced, we have no doubt about their superior qualities; but I doubt if as many named and distinct varieties were shown at their provincial and horti- cultural shows, as were exhibited at Toronto, Guelph, London and Hamilton last fall. Although the grape is indigenous to America and was found in nearly all parts of the country by the first settlers, and was utilized for wine making in Florida as early as 1564, the varieties were so inferior to those of Europe that the importation of foreign varieties began at an early date. The first attempt to establish a vineyard in the British North American colonies was made by a London company in Virginia prior to 1620, and though in a measure successful, the varieties did not do as well as in their native soil and climate. In 1683 William Penn attempted to start a vineyard near Philadelphia, without success, and in 1795 another vineyard on a large scale was planted near there by a company which only lasted a few years, and it was abandoned. Other vineyards were planted in various parts of the States, both of native and foreign varieties, and considerable wine was made, though as a general rule they were not successful until the Catawba was introduced by Major Adlum, of Georgetown, D. C., when a new era began in grape culture. The Major claimed that he had conferred a greater benefit upon the American people than he would have done by paying off the national debt, and, I presume, no one in the grape producing regions of the United States would now dispute him. This variety and the Isabella, introduced from South Carolina, were the two varieties first planted on Cayuga Lake, in the year 1854, which is now known as one of the most famous grape-growing regions in the United States. On an area of five by twenty five miles on the shores of this lake, there is from eight to ten thousand acres of vineyard yielding an annual income of nearly half a mlilion dollars, and although many other varieties have been introduced, a large proportion of Catawbas are still grown there. My experience in Canada in grape growing began with these same two varieties about the same time, at Grimsby. I then knew of no other varieties excepting a native wine grape, as it was called, something like the Clinton which grew there, and from which—with the aid of pie-plant juice, sugar and water, with, perhaps, sometimes some- thing stronger—was made what was called a “ pure native wine.” The Isabella flourished and ripened well at Grimsby ; the Catawba was too late, not ripening oftener than once in five or six years, which is too long to wait for a crop even of grapes. But soon other varieties began to multiply—the Concord, Delaware, Hartford, Diana and numerous short-lived ones, such as Perkins, Hyde’s Eliza, Northern Muscadine and the 72 famous Ontario, which were preceded by the Adirondac, Walter, Allen’s Hybrid, Martha and ‘others; and finally Rogers’ Hybrids, Moore’s Early and so on, down to the present list of Brighton, Pocklington, Niagara, Vergennes and hundreds of others (more or less): that are now clamouring for public favour. With the introduction of new varieties the cultivation began to extend, till from a few scattered vines along the Niagara peninsula, there are now several hundred acres in - the same territory, and small vineyards are scattered all over the country from Windsor to Montreal, the product of which is no small addition to the health and wealth of the country. Foremost in value to the producer, if not to the consumer, in varieties stands the Concord. Though not the earliest or best in quality, it is good enough for the masses and it will ripen in most parts of Ontario, and its healthy and vigourous growth and exemption from rot and mildew, its great producing and shipping qualities, make it unsurpassed among the black grapes for market. But the Worden, one of its offsprings, is fast gaining on it in reputation on account of its earliness, it being about a week earlier than the Concord. Moore’s Early is earlier still, of about the same quality, though not quite as productive, and would be more valuable to localities subject to early frosts. Some of Rogers’ black grapes are valuable in some localities and seasons, but there is too much foreign blood in them to stand our rigorous and variable climate. The same may be said of his red ones, as they are even more subject to mildew and rot, though in some seasons his Nos. 3, 9, 15 and 22 do wellin some sections. The Delaware, among red grapes, holds its own as well as any, though I think the Vergennes for hardi- ness, productiveness and long keeping is going to advance to the front as a market grape, though of inferior quality to the Delaware. The Brighton, where it escapes the mildew, is a profitable grape and unsurpassed in quality. In white grapes for market, I think it will be conceded by all who have tried it, that the Niagara stands where the Concord does among black for vigour, productiveness, shipping and keeping qualities—head and shoulders above every other variety, though for earliness and quality, others such as the Jessica and Lady may surpass it; and what shall I say of hundreds of other new claimants of public favour? No doubt some of them have come to stay, but the majority will not be heard of in a few years outside of the catalogues of the enterprising originators. who are pushing their sale, or from some of their customers who are lamenting over a waste of time and money in buying them. I would not be understood as condemning the testing and disseminating of new varieties, but I would make it a criminal offence for a man to sell or recommend tender or late varieties to plant in a section where he knows they will not grow, or ripen if they do grow. The great reason why grape culture has not advanced more in Canada, particularly in the colder parts, is because so many have tried tender, late and worthless varieties recommended by tree agents and nurserymen, and because these failed, have come to the conclusion that grapes will not succeed in their climate. I believe if a careful and judicious selection of varieties from the kinds we now have were made, that there are but few places in Ontario, where, with proper care and protection, they would not succeed. Further than this, I believe the time is coming when. we shall have good grapes that will grow and ripen as far north as our wild grapes grow. Our late President, Prof. Saunders, tells us that he found wild grapes growing on the Assiniboine River, in the far north-west. What is there to hinder the selecting of seeds from the best of these, and crossing and re-crossing them with our best hardy and early varieties, until. we produce something good that will stand the winters even in that climate? Cherries and apricots are grown in as cold a climate in Russia, and if apricots and cherries, why not grapes? I believe when the plans are matured which Prof. Saunders is inaugurating in connection with our experimental farms throughout the Dominion, we shall not only grow grapes but other fruits, in sections that we do not even dream of growing them in now, and that a majority at least of the inhabitants of the whole Dominion will actually sit under their own vines, if not fig trees. But it is even now being asked, “ will it pay to grow grapes?” ‘Is there no danger of overstocking the market ?’ In answer to the first question I would say, yes; at a cent a pound in the Niagara district, it will pay. Grapes can be grown as cheaply one year with another as potatoes. Four tons to the acre is about an average yield of Concords or Niagaras, which at one cent per pound would be eighty dollars per acre. What crops do 73 2 you raise on your farms that pay betterthan that? But aside from their value in dollars and cents, it pays to have such luxuries around your homes for your children and friends. There is no fruit more healthful, and there is very little trouble or expense in growing a few vines, and the enjoyment of having lucious grapes from September till February—as you can easily have—will well repay you for a few dollars outlay. In regard to the second question,—“ is there danger of overstocking the market?’—I answer, no. I recently attended the meeting of the Western New York Horticultural Society, and learned some- thing of the amount of grapes grown there. One county alone shipped 3,800 tons last fall, at an average price of two and a half cents per pound ; and this was not the largest yield, two other counties combined producing 16,000 tons, and I wondered where they all went to, till one dealer from Philadelphia stated that the house he represented had from the 3rd of September to the 23rd of December sold 332 tons, and then when I knew there were ten more such dealers in the same city and as many more in twenty or thirty other cities, I could see through it. The people in this country are only beginning to appreciate grapes. A few years ago a ton of grapes would have supplied all the cities in the Dominion, and now there are dozens of dealers in our cities who sell more than a ton a day, and some five or six tons of table and cooking grapes, to say nothing of the large amount made into wine. It is only a short time since our wives began to cook grapes, and perhaps all of them have not begun yet. But my wife would not think her winter stock of fruits complete if she had not plenty of canned grapes, besides jellies and unfer- mented wine ; and, by the way, I think there is a chance for some enterprising man to make a fortune in some of these Scott Act counties in the manufacture of this article, and the keeping of grapes for winter use is but little understood. You can just as well have good grapes on your table from September to February as apples, with about as little trouble. IL have specimens here on the table that were kept by simply wrapping the clusters in paper and putting them in open boxes and baskets in my cellar. But I will not tire your patience any longer, but simply advise you to plant grapes if you have land enough. If you do not wish to grow for market, grow enough for your own families and a few to give to the poor, and take the juice in its natural state without running it through a barrel, and you and your families will be the healthier and happier for it. President Lyon.—In regard to this canning grapes, man is a cooking animal and woman preeminently so, and the tendency is to cook what they ought to keep and use fresh. I would give more for one pound of fresh grapes than for ten pounds canned or cooked, for my own use. A Memper.—lIs the Empire State one of the best varieties, or how does it compare with the Niagara ? A. M. Smiru.—lIt is a comparatively new grape, and has not been fruited in Canada to any extent. Mr. Woolverton and I saw the fruit this winter at the Rochester meeting, ‘and I was very agreeably impressed with it. It is very good in quality, but I was a little disappointed in regard to its earliness. We here in Canada don’t want anything later than the Concord. The Empire State has been represented by agents to be considerably earlier than that. I took the liberty of inquiring particularly of the introducer in regard to that—how much earlier they claimed them to be. He said they did not claim it was any earlier. Mr. WELLINcToN.—We have fruited it two years, and as far as that test can be depended upon I am very favourably impressed with it. I think myself the quality is the best of the out-door white grapes ; that is my opinion after eating the fruit of a num- ber of varieties. President Lyoy.—Do you grow Allen’s Hybrid? Mr. Wetiineton.—Not extensively ; only for amateurs in this country. I would not call the Empire State better than the Hybrid. I am speaking of out-door grapes, 74 and I think the Empire State will come within that scope. As far as earliness is con- cerned, it is not earlier than the Concord. It was claimed that it was, but then it was ripened under peculiarly favourable circumstances. It is going to ripen about the same time as the Concord, as far as I can judge. The bunch is large and elongated; the berries are not quite as large as the Niagara, I think, but it is going to be a good keeper. I did not see the specimens exhibited at Rochester by the Horticultural Society. I think it is a grape which will take its place amongst our best varieties. As to the hardiness of the vine, we have tested that pretty thoroughly. We consider that the Pocklington is as hardy as necessary, but three years ago it stood in the same row with both the Pocklington and Concord, and was the least injured of the three. I think that was a pretty fair test, and wherever I have seen it grown it has stood the winter remarkably well. It is a better grower than the Pocklington, which will be a consideration of some weight with a great many. Mr. Huaearp.—In regard to the over producing, I am prepared to believe that there are ten times as many grapes used in Canada to-day as ten years ago. I know in the vicinity I lived twelve years ago (east of Toronto) there were only three or four parties in the town had any grapes at all. It was then generally believed that you could not succeed in ripening grapes there. Now, however, you can hardly find a garden without plums or grapes, or both of them, especially the earlier varieties ; and a finer exhibit of grapes than that made at the County Fair at Whitby a year ago last fall I have not seen for years—all grown in the immediate vicinity, white, red and black, and a great many varieties of them. People are inquiring after them much more now than at any previous time, and showing an inclination to use them if they can get them. Mr. Dempsey.—I don’t know that I could add anything to what has been said by Mr. Smith. I can see no danger of overstocking the markets, because lately the markets have been steadily increasing with us. The demand seems to increase faster than the supply, and I am therefore quite encouraged in grape culture, and shall certainly have no hesitation in increasing my plantation. Mr. Perrit.—With regard to this Empire State about which so much has been said, I have not fruited it yet, but I can see no object in going in for it very largely until we are more fully convinced that it is a grape that will be productive and healthy and will stand our climate. We have already a grape second to none, +he Niagara, a grape that has been thoroughly tested and has proved itself all that can be desired. If it has a fault, it is that it is a little liable to winter kill at the roots when young; but aside from that, in our section, it is everything that can be desired. I do not just agree with those who have spoken in regard to overstocking the market. In other countries wine-making has for many years been a great outlet for a large number of grapes, and if we have that cut off from us here to a great extent, with the territory there is in Ontario suitable tor grape culture, I am inclined to think our markets will be pretty well shut. At any rate, we will see the newer varieties selling at very low prices. I am free to admit that the demand has increased very rapidly since I began to ship grapes some ten or twelve years ago, but at the same time the supply is increasing very rapidly too. I have tested a good many new varieties, but as my experience has turned out, I cannot say very much for some of those mentioned in the paper. The Worden is growing in favour. Of course we cannot call it a very new variety, as is Moore’s Early, and of course the old Concord is being largely planted yet. Among the whites, I would say that the Niagara is far ahead of any other for profit. I find it the most profitable by far of ten or twelve varieties I had some years ago. Iam better pleased with the Pocklington now than I was when it was young ; it took a long time to get any fruit, but now the vines are growing older, it produces much better. A grape that among the whites is what the Champion is among the blacks is the » Noah, which, except the Niagara, is the most profitable I have. I always ship it to Montreal, and it generally gives me good returns. Coe’s Giant is a new kind I have fruited a few years. It has lately shown signs of tenderness and winter killing, whether from being overloaded the season before or not, I could not say. It is of fine flavour, and a very large grape. I have the Early Victor, which is another fine-flavoured grape, but the clusters are very small indeed, and it is not an attractive grape, nor is it early enough to be profitable where you can grow the Worden or Moore’s Early. The Jefferson I have fruited for some years, but I could not recommend it on account of it being so late. The Duchess I have found rather tender in the wood of the roots, not like the Niagara. The root seems to stand any amount of frost, but the wood kills; and then it spots too much with a small black spot, which spoils its appearance. The Prentiss I should not plant at all for market ; it is too much like the old Isabella. The Lady Washington is a very productive white grape, but rather late and not good enough in flavour. Mr. Hueearp.—Speaking of new grapes, there is one that I have not heard men- tioned, which I consider second to none ; it is the earliest of a lot of twenty that I have. I mean the Janesville. It is about as large as the Concord and very compact, and it is as good for sale as any grape I ever saw. To my taste the quality is ahead of the Concord, and those who have had the privilege of tasting both of them prefer to pay me two cents more for the Janesville than the Concord, although the Concord is rather larger. I quite agree with Mr. Pettit’s statement about the Prentiss. I consider it useless in our section, and the Duchess also has proved nearly so, being too small, too late and too tender for general cultivation. We have the Champion growing in all its glory, but I do not set much value on it as to quality ; it is inferior. The Pocklington has fruited with me fora few years, and this year I was rather disgusted with it, but last season I had a few clusters of the finest fruit | ever saw. The Rogers grapes do well if covered, but it is absolutely necessary to protect them during the winter; if you do not they will freeze like to the ground, and in some instances die out altogether. The Delaware is a standard variety of great excellence and highly esteemed, and brings the highest price, but the Janesville is the hardiest, and stands unprotected. A MemsBer.—What is the best method of preparing the land, and which are the best kinds of grapes to plant for general purposes ? Mr. Perrir.—Well, I would prepare the ground about the same as I would for a crop of corn or potatoes. Lay out the vinery so the rows will be a good length. If you have only an acre or two make the rows fully twice as long as the vinery is wide, which saves time in cultivation. I would plant the ordinary plants of grapes about eleven feet apart ; 1 work my vineries with a gang-plough, and eleven feet is just right for two rounds on the row. I use nothing else in the way of a plough but that, and that is one object I have in planting them at that distance, which I think is a fair one. If the ground required it I would underdrain it, and if in low soil would subsoil it. It pays well to prepare the ground thoroughly in the first place. In regard to the kinds of grapes suit- able, that varies a great deal with different localities. In my own section, in black grapes, I think fully one-half, or even more, are planting Concords. We will say half Concords, and the other half equally divided between Moore’s Early and the Worden. Of course, there are a good many No. 4 planted, and some of the other black Rogers, but they are not as reliable as the three I have mentioned. In red grapes I would plant the Delaware, Brighton and Lindley, and there are some other of the red Rogers very promising. Coming to white grapes, for profit I would stop right at the Niagara, although in some sections not as genial as ours, perhaps some of the more hardy varieties would be more profitable. Mr. Evererts.—How many wires on the trellis ? Mr. Perrit.—I use three ; some are only using two. Mr. Evererts.—How far apart are the posts? Mr. Perrir.—A post for every two vines. A MemsBer.— How high? Mr. Perrit.—About seven feet. A MemBer.—How do you like the Kniffen system ? Mr. Perrit.—With some varieties it takes better than others. Ido not think you could grow Delawares for any length of time successfully on the Kniffen system. The Niagara succeeds better with that system than any other. Mr. Lancrorp.—I would like to ask Mr. Pettit and those who go in for raising grapes extensively, if it is possible to raise them successfully without a trellis. I have been in a country where they raise grapes extensively and do not use a trellis, but raise them on shrubs—what they call a bush. a, ——— 76 Mr. Prrrit.—There are vineries in our section that have been conducted on that system for a long time, quite near us. I don’t think, however, it has been a success, and I am sure it would not be for dessert grapes. Prof. SAunpERS.—How far apart are the rows ? Mr. Pertit.—I think they would be about eight feet, if not more, perhaps. A great many of the grapes I have seen are sandy and poor, and don’t come up like those raised on a trellis. THE RELATIONSHIP OF EXPERIMENTAL STATIONS TO FRUIT GROWERS. Prof. SaunDERs then addressed the meeting on the relationship of the Experimental Stations to be establishe1 by the Dominion Government to fruit growers. He said: I shall not detain you for any length of time on this subject, but I think it well on this occasion to bring to your notice what is intended to be done at the Experimental Farms to be established by the Dominion Government, by way of feeding and encouraging fruit growing throughout the Dominion. It would be much pleasanter for me to speak of work that had been accomplished than of that which it is proposed to do, ‘for, unfortunately, we all make plans that are not carried out, and one item of actual experience is worth two or three proposed experiments. In the present instance I cannot point to any work that has been actually accomplished, further than that in the fruit way we have been successful in securing a large number of varieties of hardy Russian trees, part of which have been obtained from Prof. Budd, of Iowa, and others from nurserymen who have introduced from Russia a large number of varieties. Others have been secured, and it is the intention—in fact, negotiations in that direction are now being carried on—to secure standard varieties of fruits to be planted out in an orchard ; both large and small fruits. It is proposed to proceed on the assumption that we do not yet know what is hardy and what is not in the neighbourhood of Ottawa, where the central station is located, prac- tically ignoring the experience we have already gained, and for this reason, that I have found that the experience of all those with whom [ have talked has been more or less. mixed up with elements of uncertainty. A man will tell me that he has tried such and such a variety, and found that it is not hardy. He thinks he got the variety, but will admit that it came to hand in bad order, and as it did not grow he has jumped to the conclusion that the variety of fruit is not adapted for his district. That experience may be valuable or it may not, but I do not think it would be safe for a public institution to rest upou it. I think that every variety that it is at all within the reasonable range of probability will succeed, should be tried and a record made of the conditions under which the test is made, before we can be absolutely sure that it will not succeed. Then, it is not intended to limit the test to one tree, but to have three in every case, and five in most. instances ; and some means will be adopted to protect the trunks of these trees. Most of you have had a large experience and know that young trees, pears especially, are very often killed by the action of the sun on their trunks in spring time, after severe weather in the winter. You find a discoloration and disease in the bark which is communicated to the tree, which often dies from exposure to these variable conditions of temperature. It will be interesting, I think, to work out the problem of how far some protection—if nothing more than a piece of board tacked up to shade the tree—will be successful in preserving it from the bad results of exposure of that sort. Some claim that wrapping with straw in such a way as not to exclude the air would perhaps tide a tree over the first two or three years, until the bark thickens and it becomes covered with integumens. better calculated to resist the extreme temperature and trying conditions to which it is submitted on first coming from the nursery. I mention this as one of the lines in which we propose to make thorough tests, with a view to determining whether some of these sup- posed tender varieties cannot be tided over the period of their infancy, until sufficiently established to be grown successfully. Then this large collection of trees and vines and shrubs of a fruit-growing character will have added to them annually such varieties of newer kinds as ean be obtained, which will be tested and a report of their comparative merits given to those interested in bulletins, which will be issued from time to time, giv- 77 ing details of the work done. Another point upon which tests are desirable is the effect of hardy stocks upon scions. Some die, though we cannot see any reason why they should ; it is just a question if it does not arise from the roots being killed by the action of winter, and the stocks being tender. Most of our stocks are grown in France, where conditions of temperature very different from ours prevail. In the North-west we find the wild plum growing in great profusion, and yet I am told that plums cannot be grown there—they are too tender. I claim that where there is a wild fruit it is possible to take it and improve and crop it, and in that way obtain fruit desirable for cultivation and use. Now, how far our hardier varieties of plums would prove hardy in the North-west territory, grafted on to the native stocks, would be an interesting question to work out, and is one that will claim our early attention. I have found in the eastern part of Manitoba wild grapes, and was surprised at the size some of them grow to—large trees. It is not supposed that grapes can be grown in the North-west, but, with that as a start- ing point, I do not see why they cannot be improved as in Ontario and the eastern states, and made the equal of what they are in the latter localities. Forty years ago we had nothing but the Isabella, and before that nothing but European kinds, which would not succeed at all in western New York. Now we have almost countless varieties, some early, some late ; some adapted to one district, and some to another, but all the outcome of the practical experiments of fruit growers themselves. It is proposed in these institutions to help fruit growers, and to take up lines of experiments not so easily carried on by indi- viduals, which involve the sacrifice of more time and pains than they can devote to such pursuits, and to endeavour to originate in this country new varieties adapted not only to Ontario, but to extend the area of fruit culture to more northern regions in the older provinces, and to Manitoba and the territory further to the west. Another point which I think will be exceedingly interesting, is the getting together of the wild fruits of the different provinces of the Dominion, so as to have them grown side by side and test their relative merits. I found on inquiry that on the Selkirk range of mountains, at a high elevation, they are growing gooseberries, and the fruit is represented to me as being as large as the English gooseberry. That is a single instance, and it is likely that by taking that gooseberry and cross-fertilizing it, its objectionable features—which is a peculiar skin which reminds one of turpentine—may be eliminated, and we may obtain gooseberries from that source which will prove of great service throughout the Dominion. Things of this sort are being continually suggested to me, and we hope to get them together and make the most of the wild fruits we have, and to originate new varieties adapted to the provinces in which these grow by improving on these native wild fruits. Then it is pro- posed to test the value of the different fertilizers on these different fruits, growing them under varying conditions; to test the value of wood ashes, for instance. We know that they are valuable, but no experiments have been made to test their relative value by having one piece of ground fertilized by them, and an adjoining piece left without them. It does seem to me a matter of regret that our wood ashes should be sent hundreds of miles to the United States and sold at doub!'e the price we are willing to pay for them, and yet at which they are considered cheap as fertilizers by those who buy them. I think this altogether wrong. Ifa bushel of ashes is worth twenty cents in Michigan, it surely should be worth ten cents in Chatham. There is no reason why they should be carried away from us and sold at double the price when they might so profitably be made use of at home. The same remarks apply to our phosphates, thousands of tons of which are shipped away across the water and manufactured into valuable fertilizers, and used by farmers with good results. If they are so valuable abroad, there is no reason why they should not be equally so at home. Then, this association is interested not only in fruit, but in vegetables and the important matter of forestry. It is proposed that this should be taken up as opportunity offers, and that associated with the experiments of forestry tests will be made, not only of trees having an economical value, but of trees for orna- mental purposes. As has been remarked both here and at our gathering last night, the cultivation of ornamental varieties of trees and shrubs and flowers has an elevating tendency, and induces in people’s minds a degree of refinement and culture not easily attainable by any other means. So, while practical experiments will claim the first and greatest share of attention, I hope the more esthetic, and, as some people would call it, 78 high-toned portion of the work will not be neglected. If we can ascertain not only the relative economic value of our trees for commercial purposes, but the value also of certain varieties for their ornamental effects on the landscape, adding charms to the surroundings. of our homes, it will be a great gain. Sufficient attention has never been given to this important matter by our farmers, who, if they made the surroundings of their homes more attractive, would find their sons less prone to desert home and farm for the allure- ments of a city life. It is one of the greatest mistakes to imagine that the occupation of farming ig not as respectable as any professional pursuit. There is no higher or more ennobling occupation in the world than that of farming. The farmer who tills the soil, bringing forth from it those crops, which, by a beneficent arrangement of temperatures and seasons a wise Providence has ordained it shall afford, furnishes a foundation upon which all the civilizations of the world rest, and it is from the products of the soil that we derive the foundations of all our arts and manufactures ; in short, the most essential pursuit in every community in every age has been that of agriculture. We know that all other departments of arts, industries and sciences have received aid from government, but the actual work done in the interest of the farming community has been comparatively small. I think this new departure is one in the right direction, and it is my hope that. the results will be such in the course of time as to convince you of that fact. We are undertaking to do for the farmers and fruit growers of Canada that which they cannot do for themselves. That is, carrying on a series of exact experiments, the results of which will be reported faithfully and honestly, and which will afford opportunities for the judg- ment of the different varieties of fruit which do not at present exist. The nurseryman who places his products before us may be honest in his opinion, but when a man has money in a thing he is liable to be biased, and may fail to see imperfections which are visible to others who have not any interest at stake. It will be to your interest to have these things tested at an institution where there will be no monetary bias ; no interest to be served but that of truth and the good of the community ; and I think the results of the tests and trials thus conducted cannot fail to save the fruit growers of Canada the loss of a great deal of money which in the past has been spent on worthless things, and to materially aid and further their interests and impart a valuable stimuius on the progress of fruit culture. I think a great work has been done this year at the Colonial Exhibition in opening up the markets for our apples. The excellent report submitted by the President to-day shows that markets are opening up to an extent never before known. In connection with the important question of apples, we know very little about what our Dominion can do. I was surprised when visiting Nova Scotia to find what was being done there. It is estimated that from Annapolis alone there were shipped to Britain and the United States 300,000 barrels, and the Nova Scotia Gravensteins are considered the finest dessert apples to be had. The same state of affairs should prevail in British Cclumbia, where pears will grow in the greatest abundance and free from blight, spot or other disease ; and the most extraordinary grapes grow there that Ihave ever seen. If, as suggested by our President, we are to have a line of steamers connecting with India, Australia and New Zealand, there is a large field for work in this Dominion in carrying on such experiments as [ have been describing. The object will be to consider the interests not only of Ontario and Quebec, but those of the Maritime and Western Provinces and British Columbia, and to do all that is possible to be done towards advancing the interests of fruit growers in all parts of the Dominion. One thing I particularly request you all to do, and that is to be good enough to send your names to the Experimental Station at Ottawa for entry on the list of those to whom are to be sent the Bulletins of the association, the first of which will be issued in a short time. There - is one point I have omitted which is, perhaps, the most important of any in regard to fruit growing ; thatis, the getting together of all the seedling fruits which can be found in the Dominion and testing them side by side. I know you have in this district seedling apples and pears, some of which may be of value. By all, I do not mean all varieties of seedling apples and those that are worthless, but everything giving promise of sufficient value to be worth testing elsewhere, either on account of hardiness or other good qualities. We would like to get scions, or if possible young trees of such varieties, so that they may be grafted on fruits and put out in nursery rows until large enough to plant in orchards. 79 to be tested side by side. I was pleased to find in Nova Scotia seedlings of plums and cherries which I think will be of great service to us in the west, and the only way in which we can arrive at accurate conclusions in regard to them is by the methods I have endeavoured to detail to you—of growing them side by side in an experimental orchard, where from year to year their value as croppers and that of the fruit itself can be tested by careful and accurate notes, made by persons qualified to judge. THE LATE MARSHAL P. WILDER. The following resolution referring to the decease of Marshal P. Wilder, was read and adopted : Whereas, on the 16th December, 1886, occurred the death of M. P. Wilder, President of the American Pomological Society, at the advanced age of eighty-eight years ; and whereas, we in Canada, as well as our friends in the United States, have shared in the beneficent results of his life, devoted as it has been with the most untiring zeal and in the most unselfish manner to the advancement of horticultural science. Therefore Resolved, That we do receive the intelligence of his death with the deepest regret, recognizing his loss as not merely a local or even a national one, but as a continental one; and that we extend to his family our sincere sympathy, and order that a copy of this resolution be sent to them by the Secretary of this association. Mr. Dempsry.—I had the pleasure of being for several years acquainted with the late President Wilder, and a more sociable gentleman I never had the privilege of meet- ing. An enthusiast in fruit culture; he was always ready to try new varieties offered to. the public, and his reliability in pointing out the results of his tests caused his opinions to be largely sought for and placed implicit confidence in. Although at such a ripe old age we could hardly be surprised at his removal from our midst, yet we cannot but mourn his decease. The gap caused by the loss of such a man from our ranks cannot but be hard to fill; yet, being a believer in the theory that where the workman is removed another will be raised to take his place, I believe that it will be filled, and look to Presi- dent Barry, of New York, as the man who will fill it. Prof. SAunDERs.—I, too, had the pleasure of a personal acquaintance with President Wilder. The last occasion upon which I met him was a year ago last December, at which time I spent a very pleasant afternoon at his house near Boston. He then, in the course of his conversation, took occasion to impress on me the deep interest he felt in our Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario, and the subject of fruit culture all over our Dominion, as well as in the United States. He conversed freely about Ontario and Nova Scotia, _ and the general progress made in fruit culture during the past quarter of a century. He desired me at all times to convey to our people here the sentiments of warm friendship he entertained towards Canadian fruit growers, and his desire to render them every assist- ance consistent with his advanced age. He was expecting every year to be his last ; yet, while able to do anything, he most unselfishly gave his strength and intel'ect to the advancement of the interests of fruit culture and horticulture generally. He spoke to me especially in regard to a subject then attracting much attention, which he brought prominently before the fruit-growing public—the necessity for simplifying the nomencla- ture of our fruits. He particularly requested me to urge this upon our Canadian fruit growers. We know it has been proposed to drop many of the unnecessary names of fruits, and to bring their nomenclature within reach of the memory of men with ordinary reasonable intelligence. He had also a great horror of obnoxious names, such as “ Big Bob,” “Captain Jack,” “Jumbo,” and so on, and thought the substitution of something more euphonious and conveying a more refined impression to the minds of the public was desirable. I concur most heartily in the sentiments expressed in the resolution, and desire to add to it my tribute of sincere regret at the loss of one whose life work was given in so unselfish a manner to the great interest of fruit culture, and whose place it will indeed be exceedingly hard to fill. . President Lyon.—My recollection of the late President Wilder runs back as far as some time in 1860, when I met him at the first meeting of the American Pomological Society ever held in the State of New York. I have often met him since, and had a deal of correspondence with him. I do not know whether it is generally known, but I suppose 80 it is, that the late Colonel Wilder stood at the back of the Pomological Society, and that if he had not done so it would hardly have occupied the position it does to-day ; and it becomes quite a problem, in my estimation, what its future is going to be now he is lost to it. I believe, however, that that is partially provided for by his will. Some time before his death he intimated in his correspondence to me that he had made some provision in that direction, and I have since learned that he left $6,000, the income of which is to be devoted to the benefit of the society. This will do very much to supplement what he had done for it before, during his lifetime. The world seldom produces two such men in succession in any particular sphere, and there is a very serious doubt in the minds of many members of that society if his place can be filled. The name of a very excellent man (Mr. Barry) has been mentioned here in connection with the position, and it is very likely he will assume it, and if he does I am confident that he will do all that President Wilder did in his lifetime. At the same time the society has won a very favourable reputation under the administration of the late President W ilder, and become much stronger to bear any burdens that may be cast upon it. It is to be hoped its friends will stand by it, and that it may continue, at least as long as any of us shall remain, to stand a8 a monument of the worth of its first President. COMMERCIAL FERTILIZERS. ‘The subject of commercial fertilizers for garden and orchard was next taken up, as in Panton.—After taking a walk around the suburbs of Chatham, and hearing so much at these meetings of the natural fertility of the soil in the County of Kent, there is a natural inclination to think that this question is not one calling for any consideration here. As there may be some unfortunates at present, however, who do not reside a the cheerful town of Chatham or farm the fertile fields of Kent, a few remarks on the su ee of fertilizers may not be altogether out of place. A fertilizer, or manure, may be + = as a substance disposed to increase the fertility or productiveness of the gee er y supplying food ‘directly or indirectly. Now, it is found that as far as the app ears fertilizers or manurial agencies is concerned, there are three elements requiring ea ar observation ; the presence of these elements seems to be necessary for successful plant growth. They are nitrogen, potash and phosphoric acid—the No P) Pod sometimes eae them. The other ingredients essential to plant life are likely to be found in ae on itself, our soil being of such a character that its constituents possess more or less of t = necessary ingredients, but the nitrogen, potash and phosphoric acid are one 7 sma : quantities, and it is one or two of these elements we are after in the consideration i fertilizers. Now, at the very outset there seem to be two classes of fertilizers, one ~ which contains all these things (nitrogen, potash and phosphoric acid), and ee this class are generally known as complete or general manures. Manures of the = = class contain only one or two of these elements, and the term special, or specific, a “pp i to them ; that is, they are for special purposes. It is to these commercial ferti pase a we have now to direct our energies for a little time. Well, for the phosphoric acu vs look in bones, in the formation of which there is a large quantity of it, and in a mes: substance called “apatite,” which, when worked upon by the chemist ei a phuric acid, produces what is known as superphosphate of lime. Just let us look at 3 ms super- phosphate for a minute. Bones, as I have already said, contain this acid, and | am a everyone in the room will agree with me that bones are a most excellent fertilizer. 2 is phosphoric acid is very powerful, and holds in combination what we in chemistry sa three molecules of lime ; that is, if we took three portions of lime, this acid is ae enough to hold them together in chemical combination. When a bone is put into rs soil, nature, through the agency of rain or the decomposition of Macairars Sew a : soil, supplies an acid, which is carbonic acid. Now, this acid, acting in t rg a 4 the agency of rain or decomposition, lays hold of one of these molecules “i ae an R. certain amount of phosphoric acid is freed. The strength necessary to ho x “se “ie e- cules has now only to hold two, and consequently you get a certain amount of phosphoric 81 - acid. The chemist says we will put in a stronger acid, and puts in sulphuric acid, which tukes up two of these molecules and leaves the phosphoric acid altogether free ; and that is wherein the superphosphate of bones is more fertilizing in a short time than the ordi- nary bone. Nature is slow and steady in her action on the bone, but the chemist is quick, and the result is that he gets the use of the phosphoric acid in a very short time after it is applied to the soil. Now for the potash side of the question. There are two or three sources from which we seek that element. One is called pottassium chloride, and another potassium sulphide; but by far the best and to be had right at home, is ashes. If Prof. Saunders, through the experiments of which he has given us a sketch, succeeds in impressing the farmers of this country with a sense of their value, he will in that alone have accomplished a valuable work. It is astonishing that a fertilizing material of so much strength as hard wood ashes should be thrown aside here, and yet on being shipped to the other side realize a good price. Ordinary ashes contain a high per- centage of potash, and also a certain amount of phosphoric acid. Even when leached a large proportion of potash remains in them, the leaching only taking away twenty or thirty per cent. So that ashes become a most valuable fertilizer in supplying potash, and, to a certain extent, phosphoric acid, and whoever throws them away is wasting a most valuable manurial agent. From calculations made, basing the price of potash on a comparison with other fertilizers, a ton of good wood ashes is put at twenty dollars, taking the cost price of these various manuring constituents. The basis of this calculation [ shall refer to further along. So above all things, save your ashes, for it is generally conceded that for orchards there is no fertilizer that produces such satisfactory results. In the application of fertilizers to orchards there is an element requiring consideration, which it is not necessary to consider in farm manuring. In the case of a farm, by the rotation of crops, while you may lose in one constituent you gain in another, which is not the case in orchard cultivation or horticulture, where you have the one crop all the time. If a farmer makes a wrong application the succeeding season’s crop will get the benefit of it, but in the orchard, on account of the fixed nature of the crop, it can hardly be looked at in the same way, and the fruit grower has therefore to look more closely to results than the general farmer. The third ingredient I mentioned (nitrogen) we look for in nitrate of soda, something we have already mentioned in the compound of ammo- nium sulphate and in the dried blood to which I referred, which, if it can be obtained, is a most excellent fertilizer, especially for strawberries. The effect of from three to four hundred pounds per acre, between the rows, is productive of marvellous results, because it gives the equivalent of about fourteen per cent. of ammonia and seven per cent. of phosphoric acid. Now, then, the question presents itself about the purity of these fertilizers, a point which I am anxious to particularly emphasize. At places where large quantities of these artificial fertilizers have been used, it has been found on close examin- ation and actual analysis that a great many of them have been mere farces; that men have been buying things as fertilizers for special purposes at thirty-five and forty dollars per ton, the estimated cost price of which per ton was not more than a dollar and a half or two dollars. How can you estimate the cost per ton of a fertilizer? I will try ina few words to make that clear, so that you will be able to calculate it for yourselves. Hitherto, in the use of fertilizers in Canada, we have been working in the dark, because we had no analysis to work upon; it has not been required. Now, however, the. Dominion Government has stepped in and required that all persons selling artificial fertilizers shall produce an analysis of what they are selling, stating the percentage of each ingredient it contains. By making a reasonable estimate of the cost of these to the manufacturer, a fair idea of the value of the fertilizer may be obtained. Nitrogen may be estimated at from fifteen to- twenty cents per pound, potash at from five to seven cents, phosphoric acid from four to twelve cents ; these are the commercial values, and leave the manufacturer a fair price. There is no regular fixed price, but you will see in the spring of the year, particularly across the lines, printed schedules of what they think the values of these ingredients are, and I have no doubt but our Dominion Government will publish what they consider the estimated value per pound of nitrogen, phosphoric acid and potash. Now let us see how the price of the manure is made out. You have the analysis, which tells you that it contains so much per cent. of nitrogen, which means 6 (F.G.) 82 so many pounds of nitrogen in each hundred pounds of the fertilizer. The analysis also shows you the percentage of potash and phosphoric acid. All you have to do then, is to take this schedule giving you the prices for that year, and if nitrogen is worth twenty- five cents per pound and the fertilizer contains five per cent. of it, it would make one dollar and a quarter for that. If it contains eight per cent. of potash, and potash is valued at eight cents per pound, that will be sixty-four cents. Then if the percentage of phosphoric acid is. five per cent., and the value of the acid twelve cents per pound, that will be sixty cents. You will add these three amounts together, which will give you the price per hundred pounds of the fertilizer, and that again multiplied by twenty will be the value per ton. Now, if you find this estimated value per ton of a fertilizer is about ten dollars, and your agent is asking you thirty dollars for it, it shows that there isa tremendous margin, and very likely a great deal of adulteration in it. In places where this system has been carried on, in the earlier stages of this detective business of setting the chemist on the manufacturer, the frauds that were discovered being perpetrated on ignorant purchasers were surprising. As I said before, farmers and fruit growers were paying thirty-five and forty dollars per ton for manures, the estimated cost of which was not more than one dollar and a half, all sorts of tricks being resorted to in order to induce them to purchase. You will find that this system of analysis will bring about a much more satisfactory state of affairs, and inspire people with much greater confidence in this class of fertilizers. In the past men have bought alleged fertilizers from time to time, and on trying them found no appreciable results, and consequently they pooh-pooh all artificial fertilizers now. The other day, down at Carleton, a very energetic gentleman— something like our friend Mr. Mackenzie Ross here—got up to speak, and said to me, “You come from Guelph; I am going to go for you.” I said, “ Well, what is the trouble?’ Well, it was all about a fertilizer manufactured in the vicinity of Guelph some years ago. A great many of the market gardeners around Carleton had bought it, and ‘ from their description of it, I believe if an analysis of it had been made it would not have been found worth more than three or four dollars a ton. This gentleman himself was so disgusted with it that he frightened the manufacvurer into taking it back and paying the freight on it. Well, we have the means now of avoiding that sort of thing, and if you were not previously aware of it, I tell you know that you ought not to buy any fertilizer without being acquainted with its analysis, and when you know that you can easily calculate its. cost by this schedule of prices. If you do not know where to lay hands on that, write to the Agricultural College at Guelph or to the Experimental Station, and any of us will furnish you with the rates. If the estimated cost is less than the selling price, then you are paying too dear for your whistle. We come now to the home manufacture of fertilizers, which I believe is well worth consideration by fruit growers and gardeners. Make your own. You have your wood ashes, and as regards your superphosphate, you can make that too. It is generally conceded by persons who have tried it that a saving of twenty per cent. is effected in doing so, and at the same time you are sure of having the pure thing. I will give you a mixture or two that you will find most excellent for orchards and gardens—first by bulk. Take one part—a barrel, pail or any similar vessel of that kind will do—of bone dust, two parts of ashes, one-third of water (enough to saturate it) and one-sixth of what you ordinarily call plaster ; this will make a most excellent superphosphate. You will have a mixture that has phosphoric acid in the bones and potash in the ashes. Of course it will lack nitrogen, but you get that in farm- yard manure, and if you like you can apply that. The phosphoric acid, however, is more- likely to be deficient in the soil than the nitrogen, and it is that for which we are looking. Another excellent mixture I can give you by weight—one part of bone, one of ash, about a quarter of slacked lime and about one-eighth of crude carbonate of soda. After that is mixed a little while, if you will add some soil, say one-fifth of the bulk, you will have an excellent mixture for the orchard. Another point I desire to impress on you is. that you should know what to believe. I think that horticulturists and fruit growers should be observing men, and I am sure those present here are, otherwise the discussions of the last two days could not have been conducted in the vigourous manner they were. Now, in the application of fertilizers there is a great need of observation, and if I were a fruit grower I would try littleexperiments of my own in the orchard and field, and see 85 for myself whether a certain application of ashes or superphosphates brought about good results ; nature gives the best answers to all these questions. In the early days of agri- cultural science there was a rage prevalent in the country for sending a box of the soil of the farm to a chemist for analysis. Now, there can be but little of it in a box, and the ingredients are in such small proportions that a chemist might make a mistake in detecting them, or he might find the quantities there and yet not in the condition. You might take some soil that you knew would produce a very poor crop to a chemist, and after analyzing it he might send you a very fine statement of it. There is more to be learned now from the mechanical condition of the soil than from the chemical. Of course there must be the constituents in the soil, but it is wonderful how we have been favoured by Providence in this part of the country in giving us a sufficiency of these constituents. The trouble is, however, that we do not throw enough skill into their cultivation to make the most of them. High culture, thorough culture, is something the necessity for which those who are trying to wring their sustenance out of the soil must become fully impressed with at the present time. That a market gardener can get as much out of one aere as a farmer does out of ten is only the effect of high culture ; they plough thoroughly, dig thoroughly and add plenty of manure. You cannot lay much stress upon an analysis of the soil. The only case in which it is of much benefit is where—as is sometimes the case—there is an ingredient in the soil which may bring about a poisonous effect upon vegetation, and there the detection of that element becomes a vital matter. But taking the soil in general you cannot make much out of a chemical analysis, whereas if you experiment with a fertilizer the result is transparent. You may take a good result asa true reply from nature that she wants some of the constituents contained in that fertilizer. Therefore, I say, be experimentalists; get all the help you can from the College or the Experimental Station at Ottawa, but remember that there are conditions surrounding us that may not affect you, and the best plan of allis to keep your eyes open, and keep them fixed on the soil. I think if you apply some of these fertilizers from time to time you would soon have a pretty rational idea of the condition of your soil, and what fertilizers are likely to bring about favourable results in connection with it. Mr. Mackenzie Ross.—There is another fertilizer which has not been mentioned— soot. If the soil is well worked and pulverized, then the soot sown, and after that cleaned out and hoed, and a row of wood ashes run between the rows it has a good effect. Then there is another fertilizer. When you go out on a frosty morning you see the heap of manure round in the barn yard smoking. Now, that vapour goes up into the clouds, and comes back to us in the rain, and there is no fertilizer on the earth equal to what we get from the clouds. Is it any thing else than the ammonia which ascends from the manure? Prof. Panroy.—The ammonia that you send up from your manure pile may be blown over to Guelph, where we may get the benefit of it. Mr. Daniet Witson.—I am not a gardener, but a plain farmer, and have listened with attention to the remarks of the gentleman—who has been speaking, and who I am told is a professor from the Agricultural College,—out of which I endeavoured to get as much information as I could. He has told us all about the necessary ingredients—the superphosphate and so on, and he has also told us that we are blessed with different kinds of soils. Well, certainly we are blessed with different kinds of soil, from what I have seen of Guelph and the banks of the Thames. In conversation with Professor Brown, at the College, I asked him what it took to put the land in a fair state of cultivation, and he told me fifteen tons of barnyard manure and three hundredweight of phosphate to the acre. Well, I told the professor, and I tell you here, that if you applied that in this county you would not get anything but straw. But take that straw and put it in your barn yard manure, and don’t let that grand fertilizer go to waste. I don’t think, gentlemen, that you and I would differ about the necessity of superphosphate for the county of Kent, if you had travelled through it as much, or lived in it as long as Ihave. If you looked at the orchards in the various parts of this county you would find too much fruit ; too much vegetation ; too much force of sap. What we want here instead of any forced growth is proper pruning of our orchards: the chemical properties 84 _ necessary for plant growth are right here. We have from six to ten feet of vegetable soil on the bank of this river, extending through a large portion of the county. If the farmers would apply at the proper time what is going to waste in their barnyards there would be no necessity for telling us what superphosphate is composed of. As an Englishman said, ‘Muck the field, and it is sure to give you a crop.” How much manure do you think there is going to waste in this town! In almost all parts of it horses are kept, and you will find an immense quantity of manure going to waste. If there is any fertilizer needed on the farm remove that and put it where it is needed, and never say a word about chemicals. You would never try to make me believe I wanted chemicals, if you came and walked over my farm. It-is necessary that you should have a mixed system of farming—pasture some and till some; you cannot till all nor pasture all. Keep about as much stock as you can, and put the manure out at the proper time, and you will find that good returns will repay you for your labour. Prof. SaunDERS.—What time do you put your manure on your fields 4 Mr. Witson.—The best time is to take it out as soon as possible previous to applying it ; take it on the land in its raw state, particularly on what is called sandy loam, and plough it in for the spring crop. Mr. Dempsey.—There is manufactured in our neighbourhood a superphosphate made out of fish gathered from the lake, which are submitted to the action of sulphuric acid. What would be the probable value of that as a fertilizer ? Prof. Panton.—I think it would be a good fertilizer, but the- best way is to ask for the analysis. In reply to Mr. Wilson’s remarks, I would remind him that I said at the outset that here we were in paradise, and that the question of artificial manures in the county of Kent was not one calling for consideration. Mr. WELLINGTON.—I just wish to corroborate what has been said by Professor Panton in regard to the value of ashes as a fertilizer for trees. That is as far as I can go. What we learn by experience we know, and for a number of years I have used wood ashes for trees. We have in the same block, barnyard manure and ashes, and the com- parison has always been in favour of the wood ashes; you could tell the trees to which they had been applied without the least effort. The ashes are productive of a smooth, clean gro» th, and we value them so highly as a fertilizer that we keep teams constantly employed scouring the country as far as twenty miles around gathering hardwood ashes. It is a mistake, no doubt, for the people who have them to let them go, but they are certainly extremely valuable to the fruit grower. We usually pay ten cents per bushel for them, but at the present [ believe we are paying as high as fifteen cents. Mr. Macponatp.—In regard to the application of fertilizers generally, there is a point worthy of observation, which is this: As Professor Panton said the other day in reference to bacteria, the attention of fruit growers is being turned to dealing with the plant itself—to making it hardy and strong. Now, that does not apply to bacteria alone, but to almost everything else. If you make a hardy, thrifty tree, in any mauner whatever, it is more able to resist diseases of all kinds—parasites, bacteria, fungoid growths and everything else. Now this is something which can be done by the judicious application of fertilizers, and in no other manner that I know of, and in this — respect there are two ideas which ought to be corrected, which were expressed here yesterday. It was proved here yesterday by a man of experience that where barn- yard manure had been applied it proved detrimental to his trees, producing blight. Now, that was the effect of creating too much woody growth, something which all nitro- genous fertilizers do; and nitrate of soda—which has been spoken of here—is one of these, and I do not think it would be wise to apply it in any large quantities, especially if you have much barnyard manure with it. I say that the proper’ way to create a vigorous growth in a tree is by the application of other than nitrogenous fertilizers, and of course these have to be applied according to the condition of the soil. I proved this. _ beyond a doubt myself in several experiments I made with potatoes; where I used an excess of barnyard manure I had always a larger growth of tops, which were not so strong and healthy, and able to resist diseases as much as smaller tops with larger tubers. I have found by accurate weighings where I applied 20 tons to the acre I had forty per cent of rotten potatoes and where I applied other manure I had only fifteen per 85 cent. I think someone said here that we could not depend on artificial fertilizers to supplant barnyard manure. Perhaps we can’t, but by the use of them barnyard manure can be economized. If you have only enough barnyard manure for ten acres apply it to twenty acres, using with it some artificial fertilizer containing elements that the soil, to which it: is to be applied, needs. Don’t think so much about the plant. Of course, some plants are benefited by certain fertilizers more than others, but as a usual thing it is the soil that must be looked to more than the plant in choosing a fertilizer. Whether it is in fruit or anything else you must ascertain whether the soil is deficient in potash or phosphoric acid. You can easily tell if you have sufficient nitrogen ; if the vegeta- tion is profuse you have enough nitrogen. I think three-quarters of this country could be benefited by the application of phosphates in some form or another. It is complained by fruit growers and farmers that these fertilizers are too high in price, and there is a good deal of truth in it. It has long been supposed that phosphate should be dissolved before beneficial effects can be produced. The tendency now, however, is not to have phosphates so soluble as formerly—it is not consider+d necessary to have them so very soluble. They have machines now for grinding this apatite as fine as flour, and if held up to the wind it flies away like dust. The finer this phosphate can be made the more valuable it is as a fertilizer. I think if experiments were tried in a systematic manner by applying some of this phosphate flour to the trees around the roots when planting, and then watching the results carefully, both where it had been applied and also where it had not, the comparison would be productive of some valuable experience. Prof. SaunpErs.—I would like to hear whether barnyard manure is better green or decomposed—a little further light on that point would be valuable. From some inquiries made I find it is used in the green state during the winter, carting it directly on to the fields, and letting the leaching be done there. I think this is one of the most practical points that has come before us, because by the ordinary methods of keeping barnyard manure, where the barnyard is not so situated as to retain the drainage, there is a large loss to the farmer. If that can be avoided by taking the manure out during the winter months, teaming it out: to such places as it may be useful in the spring, it is a _thing we ought toknow. Those who have tried the plan of carting their manure out - to the fields every day say that they get better crops in that way than they did when they allowed it to accumulate in the yard and rot. Others, again, urge that it is better to rot it first ; there are two sides to the question, and I would like to hear from some of those present their views on the subject. A Memser.—If you want the manure to have its effect quickly it must be applied in the rotten state. Where it is applied green the benefit is not gained till the next year. F. W. Witson.—That is not my experience. I never got any good by piling manure. I think I got more immediate benefit with the spring manure than when it. was piled. It beats me to know how any good can be derived by piling it, for the good properties are evaporating all the time. I believe in ploughing it in in the spring. Prof. Panton.—For the orchard I would say look after your ashes, and if you make that mixture you will find it an excellent fertilizer ;.and in the garden—for that, I think, is what we are talking about—I think well rotted manure would be the best. Mr. Macponatp.—I have had little experience in rotten manure. [ last year tried cow dung without any urine on an onion plot of about a quarter of an acre, at the rate of sixty-two horse loads to the acre. I put part on in the fall and ploughed it down, another part I put on as atop dressing. The manure happened to be full of all sorts of weeds, and I got the benefit of them. Where I ploughed it under I had a tremendous pile of the onion maggot, where it was used as a top dressing there were less, and least of all where there was no manure put at all. I don’t know whether that proves anything or not, but it is my experience. -There are a great number of conditions to be observed in the application of inanure, whether rotted or green. If absorbents are used with the green manure, so that the liquid goes with it, it is very strong, and acts as quickly as fermented manure, but if it is put on in connection with straw without being fermented it must be put on clay soil. Then in some cases it might be beneficial, but in others might have the reverse effect. Its effect is beneticial in this way, that it opens the soil for the absorption of ammonia and moisture from the atmosphere, but you cannot get 86. any moisture from the loam because moisture will not enter coarse manure on the surface of the soil. So that whether manure is fermented or not depends a good deal upon the circumstances. Never apply green manure on light soil, but fermented manure may be employed on light soil. If you apply manure green you must be careful of weeds, and often, even if fermented at the ordinary temperature, it will not kill them ; it requires a high temperature. VOTES OF THANKS. On motion of Mr. F. W. Wilson, seconded by Mr. John Macklin, a vote of thanks was tendered the President and Directors of the Association for having chosen Ohatham as the place for the winter meeting. On motion of Mr. F. W. Wilson, seconded by Mr. Mackenzie Ross, the thanks of the Association and Meeting were tendered to Mr. President Lyon, of the Michigan State Association, for his presence and valuable aid in carrying on the various discussions. REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON FRUITS. The report of the committee on fruits was presented as follows, and taken as read :— Your committee have carefully examined and find— E. Tyhurst, of Leamington, shows six varieties, all fine specimens, N. Spy, Baldwin, King, Ben Davis, Golden Russet, and one variety although strongly resembling - Fallawater, your committee did not recognize, all very fine. ft. T. Tyhurst, Harwich, shows five varieties, R. I. Greening, Flushing, Spitzenburg, King, Baldwin, N. Spy, all very good. Joseph Ripley, Kent Bridge, shows excellent specimens of Fallawater, Gloriamundi, R. L. Greening, and fair of Baldwin and Phenix, which is commonly and erroneously called Red Canada, and the Bradt Seedling, a russet shown by Stone and Wellington, about the size of American G. Russett, but evidently quite distinct. Quality superior. Also Canada Baldwin which was grown in Quebec, hardy and beautiful. W. McKenzie Ross, shows Nick-a-Jack, a fair large apple, valuable for long-keeping qualities; a very superior large apple improperly labeled White Winter Pearmain ; excellent specimens of Bellflower, Northern Spy; good Ben Davis, American Golden Russet, Wagener, Cayuga Red Streak, R. I. Greening and Lady, and fair specimens of Grimes Golden and Mann, and a seedling of no particular merits—13 varieties in all. Richard Tyhurst, a sweet and large red seedling apple of good appearance. Thomas Beall, of Lindsay, a large red seedling of no marked quality in appearance. Excellent specimens of Pewaukee and Ontario apples. T. R. Merritt, St.\Catharines, shows the Columbia, a very good winter pear, a little above medium size and of superior quality. The committee are of opinion that this pear should be better known. Also the following specimens in a fair state of preservation :— Oswego Beurre, Vicar of Wakefield, Winter Nelis, Easter Beurre, President Druard, Mount Vernon, and J osephine de Malines, a very well flavoured winter pear. A. M. Smith, specimens of the Champion Quinces, which show wonderful keeping qualities ; also, Vergennes grapes which were kept wrapped in paper and in an open box in the cellar. The Vergennes cannot receive too high a recommendation for high and excellent keeping qualities. Many bunches were as perfect as when plucked from the vine. Also, Niagara in fair condition, showing it can be called a good keeper. 87 A. A. Wright, Renfrew, shows very good specimens of celery of the White Plume variety. While the specimens are well grown, to our mind this variety lacks quality. The appearance is good, but the stocks lack that crispness so necessary to good celery. They are pretty, but tough. L. Wolverton, of Grimsby, shows some perfect specimens of Spanish chestnuts and pecan nuts. (Signed, ) A. M. Smiru, F. W. WILSON, - Committee. W. E. WELLINGTON, ‘ BEST VARIETIES OF PEARS. The six best varieties of pears, (2) for home use, and (b) for market, was then discussed. The SrcreTary.—Not including the newer kinds which have not been tested, I would name the following six, given in the order of ripening, for home use :—Kostiezer, a small but delicious pear, the Bartlett, Clapp’s Favourite, Sheldon, Angouleme and Anjou. For the market, the Rostiezer, Bartlett, Clapp’s Favorite, Anjou, and the Howell, not a pear of very excellent quality, but large in size and an abundant bearer, which has produced very large crops with me, and which I think is a very desirable market pear. The Anjou is a most beautiful pear. At Rochester, at the meeting of the New York State Horticultural Society, President Barry exhibited some of the best specimens I ever saw. ‘That was on the 26th of January last, and they were preserved in the most excellent condition. They were equal in size to our Duchess, and they were surpassingly beautiful in appearance. The sight of them made me ambitious to plant largely of the Anjou pear. President Barry said there was nothing extraordinary in the method of culture, just ordinary good care had produced the results. Mr. Mackenzie Ross.—There is a pear called the Elliot, not usually called early, which is one of the loveliest we possess. It comes in at the same season with the Doyenne D’Ete. Clapp’s Favourite is perhaps one of the finest pears we possess, both for market and home use. We have about twenty-five trees of them, and our practice is to place the fruit on a floor between woollen cloths, leaving them for thirteen days. At the end of that time one would not think they were the same pears, they are just as yellow as you please. The Bartlett, as the Secretary has said, is a delicious pear, and will give satisfaction in almost any place, but it is a little tender. We prefer in our section, or even further north, Doyenne Boussock, which will produce twice as many pears as the Bartlett. With the Anjou we find some fault, it is rather a shy bearer; [ might say very shy indeed. I have a tree that has been twenty or more years planted, and which never produced me a bushel of pears but one year—a large tree too. The pear itself is all I could ask in a pear. I would substitute for it as a winter pear the Josephine De Malines, and allow me to say here that in winter pears I recommend the same for market as for home use. We get more satisfaction from our winter pears since we have learned how to handle them. After gathering them we keep them as cool as we can safely until near the time they are wanted for use, and then bring them up into a warm room and force the maturity as fast as possible. A winter pear ripened in a tem- perature of 70 is very much superior in flavour to one ripened in a lower temperature. The Doyenne Boussock did not give satisfaction for several years; it seemed as if we could not mature the fruit at all.* Now, however, since we have learned how to handle them, we find they are a very nice pear indeed, but they want to be ripened so you would almest think they were rotten, and when in this state their flavor is delicious. This is also the case with the Clairgeau. President Lyon.—There is a pear which I am surprised has not attracted more attention as a market variety. I refer to the Sterling. It bas never had anyone to push it. Mr. Downing spoke of it as suiting him very well, and it is of better quality \ ——_— $$ 88 } than the average market pear. It is a very clear, brilliant yellow, with red crimson cheeks. It wonld ripen here about the 1st of September. The flesh is clear and white, and very sweet, and the taste to those who like a sweet pear is very pleasant. It is one of the most attractive pears that can be put on a market stand, and brings a very high price. The tree is a strong, handsome, upright grower, and in sixty years acquaint- ance with it I have never known a case of blight ; when all others were blighted it was all right. I know trees that were planted in 1825 which were perfect the last time I saw them. The only case of blight or anything approaching it which has ever come under my, notice was caused by a stock which was grafted on it, but even then there was no blight as far as I could see in the variety itself. Anyone trying it will find it a pro- fitable tree, and desirable as well for their own use. The meeting then adjourned sine die. SUMMER MEETING. The summer meeting of the Association was held in the town hall, Colling. commencing on Wednesday, June 29th ; the President, A. McD. Allan, in the ebair. The Secretary read a letter from Mr. William Saunders, Director of the Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, expressing regret at his inability to be present at the meet- ing, he being.engaged in locatifig the Experimental Farmin Nova Scotia ; and conveying kindest regards to the president, directors and members of the Association. A GENERAL DISCUSSION ON ORCHARDS. The first subject on the programme for discussion was “ The Apple; varieties adapted to the counties of Simcoe and Grey.” The President called on Mr. W. W. Cox, of Collingwood Township, to lead the discussion. Mr. Cox.—I live on the mountain in Collingwood township, where the soil is a red clay loam. In regard to the varieties of apples which may be grown in these counties, I might say that almost any of the known varieties can be successfully grown, and they will produce splendid specimens of fruit ; the main trouble is that we cannot get people to pick and ship them right. I will mention a few of the summer apples I have seen here, though of course there may be a great many more. They are the Early Harvest, Keswick Codlin, Red Astrachan, Sweet Bough and several others, of all of which I have Seen very fine specimens. The Secrerary.—What about the Early Harvest? Doesn’t it spot here ? Mr. Cox.—Now I remember, I believe I did see some spotted at Clarksburg. In autumn varieties, there are the Alexander, Colvert, Gravenstein, Duchess of Olden- burg and Fall Pippin, which all do well; I never saw the like of what we had at the show here. The Presipent.—Do you consider the Duchess of Oldenburg a fall apple here ? Mr. Cox.—Yes, we call it a falf apple here. Then there is the Maiden’s Blush— I have seen some of the most beautiful specimens of this apple here I ever saw in my life,— and the St. Lawrence and the Twenty-ounce Pippin. The Prestpent.—Does the St. Lawrence spot ? Mr. Cox.—I never knew it to spot at all. In winter varieties, we have the Baldwin, King of Tompkins County, Roxbury Russet, Talman Sweet, Kentish Fill Basket, Mackintosh Red, Ribston Pippin, Northern Spy, Rhode Island Greening, Wagener 89 and the Mann apple, all of which do well and produce very fine specimens. Of course the soils vary a good deal about here: go a mile and you will perhaps find it very different, and some of the soils just around the town here will not grow what we can out on the clay. The PrestpEnt.—Do you find a variation in the fruit on these different soils ? Mr. Cox.—-Yes. We find that they succeed far better on the clay soil, where we have a strong natural drainage. The SEcRETARY.—Did you say you had the King of Tompkins? Mr, It does splendidly, it is hardy and bears well-—~that is over the mountain, I could nd say for those down here. Mr. Brapte. —Any trouble with them dropping off immaturely ? Mr. Cox.—They have not found any fault with them in this respect. The Prestpent.—Do you find any trouble in regard to hardiness further Hip Mr. Cox.—There used to be, but I think it is being overcome now that the country is getting more cleared up. A friend of mine who has seven hundred acres of land there says his trees are dog better now than they did a few yearsago. Take a range across the rear, over the mountain, a few miles from Owen Sound back from the bay, and I never saw anything finer in my life than the apples are. One of the judges of the Provincial Show told me he had neyer seen finer fruit ; he could hardly believe that the Baldwin could be grown as we grow it here, and when he came to look at the other varieties he said, “Well, I never saw such fruit in my life before.” The great trouble has been to get people to take care of their trees; they don’t take any care of them, and then if they don’t do ‘well they blame the agent or the nurseryman. . The Presipent.—You think any of the known varieties can be grown in these counties ? Mr. Cox.—Yes. The Secretary.—lIn our Report for 1884 a list was given of varieties suitable for Simcoe and Grey, in which two or three were mentioned as not being hardy—the King and the Baldwin were spoken of as being tender. Now, it seems from what we have heard to-day, that they are not at all tender ; the Report is scarcely correct in that ? Mr. Cox.—Well, there might be some places back in Melancthon and Osprey where the soil is very mucky—sort of swampy, and in such places certain apples will not do. But all around here, for a radius of twenty miles, I think there is no difficulty with the apples mentioned ; except, as I have already said, that people don’t take care enough of them. Dr. AYLEswortH, Jr., of Collingwood.—The counties of Grey and Simcoe are very large, and the soil in Grey is very different from that of Simcoe. If you go east or west of this town for a few miles you will find this clay which has been spoken of, but go east and you will find sand for miles, and the northern part of Simcoe is like Muskoka and that region, where you cannot grow anything at all to speak of. But along this lake shore, on this clay ground, anything may be grown—any kind of fruit of medium hardi- ness. In this sand around the town, however, you, can grow neither apples or pears. When you get above the mountain, away from the lake four or five miles, most of the apples mentioned will not be found hardy, but anywhere along the lake they can be grown, Mr. T. B. Wurre. (Collingwood township).—I live in the Beaver River valley, where the soil is a clay loam, though at the back of that there ismore sand. My land, however, is mostly clay loam with a hard pan bottom, not in every respect first class, but good land. As regards apples, I find that [ can grow the Northern Spy, Russets, Snow Apples, Astrachans, and some others, the names of which I don’t just remember, all of which do well with me. I had one—I think it was a Rhode Island Greening—which I tried twice, but did not succeed with it. | The PresipentT.—For an early variety what do you prefer ? Mr. Wuirr.—The Red Astrachan. The Prestpent.— Does it spot ? Mr. Wuire.—No. The Prestpent.—Do you have any small apples? Is the crop generally of good size ? Mr. Wuite.—Yes. Last year they had the appearance as if they were going to be 90 very small, but there came on a tremendous rain, and they all turned to be a good size; the whole orchard. Speaking of localities, Dr. Aylesworth, I think, said two or three miles from the lake, certain kinds would not be hardy ; I think we might say six or seven, or eight miles. The Presipent.— You think they are subject to winter killing further inland ? Mr. Wuite.—Oh, yes; I think so. South of us, in Osprey, they have poor success. Men there have planted year after year, and still have no orchards; though they think they have done better of late years with selected kinds. Mr. Britiincer, of Collingwood.—I have seen a good deal of fruit tested, though I don’t grow any myself. Mr. Cox is a mountaineer; he can only speak of the mountain. When you come down here on to this light land it is very different. At Stayner, about nine miles south of this, the King is not hardy enough ; two years ago a great many of them were killed. A man who had a very large orchard there told me he lost a great number of them by winter killing. Mr. Wricut, of Renfrew.—How low does the thermometer generally register here? Mr. Brituincer.—I think as low as 32 below zero. Mr. A. M. Smita, of St. Catharines.—A little too cold for the Baldwin. Mr. Brinuincer.—It is very seldom so low as that, but I have seen it that low. Mr. CarpenterR.—I think 32 below is exceptional weather ; we do not often get it below 20. Mr. Conn, of Collingwood township.—The only thing I have ever noticed wrong with my apple trees is that the last few years they have spotted ; some trees that I had in an old garden were nearly all spotted. The Seoretary.— Were the Greenings spotted with you ? Mr. Conn.—Yes, very badly. The Secretary.—The Snow Apple ? Mr. Conn.—Yes. The closer they are placed together the worse they are; if you get out in the open they are not so bad. Spitzenbergs have done pretty well, and Wageners don’t spot very much. Mr. Beatt, of Lindsay.—Is the Spitzenberg healthy with you ? Mr. Conn.—Yes, it produces a good crop. The Baldwin does not winter kill with Mr. Beatt.—How old are your Spitzenberg trees ? Mr. Conn.—About twelve years; we planted the first about fifteen years ago. Mr. Hicx.1ne, of Barrie.—I have been growing apples now fer between thirty and forty years, and I find that while some do well for a time, others totally fail. I have just made a note of those which I consider the most choice, and which can be the most easily produced, for market purposes. For summer apples I would notice the Early Harvest, which has done very well for a time, but for the last few years has been badly subject to spot, and in some instances the trees have failed. The next on the list is the Red Astrachan, a very popular apple, and good for marketing ; I think it is spotted a little, but not so bad as some others.. Then there is another apple which is not very gen- erally known around here—the Williams’ Favorite, a red summer apple. Then there is another called the Porter, a very good serviceable apple, which answers either for dessert or cooking. The Early’Joe is too small for market, though the trees are very prolific, and strong, and healthy. It comes in for cooking on account of its growing faster than the others ; it answers as a green apple. The Presipent.—Don’t you find the Duchess of Oldenburg desirable ? Mr. Hickiine.—I have not come to that yet. There is the Summer Pearmain, a very nice apple. Of course some of these apples might almost be called fall apples in this part of the country. The Duchess of Oldenburg, taken on every point, I think is the apple for market and for domestic use, though it does not ripen so early as some others, but it comes into bearing very early. For fall apples there is the Alexander, a very showy apple, but I think a little tender. The St. Clair is very good, although the last few years it has taken the spot. Then there is the Fall Pippin and the Colvert, though I don’t think I need occupy your time with a description of them. I have an apple in my orchard—the name of which I do not know,—but from the picture in the 91 Horticulturist, I think it resembles the Yellow Transparent—-a clear yellow, tinged on one side with crimson. It is a very showy, pretty apple, and comes in, I think, in the latter end of September. The SecretTary.—Then it would not be the Yellow Transparent, that is too late for it. Mr. Hicktine.—It resembles it very much, but I do not know the name of it. For winter apples I should include the Golden Russet, Northern Spy, Fameuse, the Ontario, —which is a new apple that is doing very well. The Secretary.—Does it pay you to grow the Snow apple? Mr. Hicxitine.—Yes, it is not so bad the last year or so as formerly ; it seems to me that this year I have not seen any spot whatever on them ; other years I noticed it almost as soon as the apple wasformed. Whether it is going to be free or not I cannot say, but I hope it is. The Swayzie Pomme Grise is a very good winter apple, and the Seek-no- further does remarkably well ; it bears heavy crops, and is very good for the market. The Rox-bury Russet is a good apple, and the Yellow Bellflower, and the Rhode Island Greening. The PresipEnt.—Do you find these varieties all sufficiently hardy in your section ? Mr. Hicxiine.—I think so, take them on the whole. The PrestpENT.—You are close into Barrie ? Mr. Hickxiine.—Yes. The Presipent.—Is there any difficulty further inland ? Mr. Hicxxiinc.—It was a general complaint two years ago all over that the Baldwin was badly affected by winter killing, but this last winter it does not seem to have suffered ; the trees seemed to stand it very ‘well, Of course there are many varieties which I have not mentioned, but I think those I have included are the principal ones. The SecreTary.—Is not the King apple tender with you? Mr. Hicxirne.—I don’t know that it is, though perhaps it is not as hardy as some others. Mr. Broxovski.—I live in the township of Medonte. I think the hardiness of apples is influenced to a great extent by the kind of land they are grown on. We have planted a number of trees, and havea very inferior orchard at the present time, but I think we wiil try again. The Presipent.—Have you ‘underdrained your orchard ? Mr. Broxovski.—There is no necessity for doing so; it is perfectly dry without The Northern Spy does not succeed at all there ; it grows up six or seven years and then winter-kills—dies out in a year or two. I don’t think there is one in that part of the country. The St. Lawrence used to do well at one time, but it is failing now. The ' Duchess of Oldenburg succeeds admirably. There is another variety, the Brockville ‘ Beauty, not a very large apple, high colored, and having a fine flavour, which does very well. In fall apples I think the Haas (or the Fall Queen) succeeds best. Fallawater also succeeds moderately well. We have tried the Mann apple, but it is not a success ; but our only experience with it was in an unfavourable locality, and it would hardly be fair under the circumstances to condemn it. The Presipent.—You say your section does not require drainage ? Mr. Broxovsk1.—It does not ; it is rolling land. The Presipent.—Have you ever tried draining ? Mr. Broxovsk1.—No. The Prestpent.—Then I should recommend you to do so. A Mr. Smiru.—You say you have a hard clay bottom? Mr. Broxovsk1.—Yes, in seme places. The strata varies, some places there is a clay bottom, and in some sandy—when you get up high—and then clay beneath, and then when you get down lower again a kind of fine sand. We are introducing the Wealthy as a winter apple, and it seems to do very well. The Baldwin does not seem to succeed. There is another winter apple called the Red Pound, which is grown there considerably. It is a good deal like the Pearmain in shape, very large and red, with brown spots showing throngh it. The Presipent.—I think it is one of the Pearmains. I know they call it the Red Pound. The Prestpent.—I think the Baldwin should succeed there. They grow it away east in Mr. Croil’s district and Mr. Beall’s. Mr. Beatu.—I found it, but not just in our neighbourhood. Mr. Crort.—How low did you have the thermometer last winter ? Mr. Broxovski1.—I think about thirty was the lowest. I think that is what tried -the trees very much when it went down so low. The afternoon before it had been up in the thirties above, and at nine o’clock the next morning it was down to thirty below. The Presipent.—You say that in your district there is a rock formation. Is it limestone ? Mr. Broxovski.—No. Granite, I think. The Presipent.—In that district, you say, they can grow fruit ? Mr. Broxovski1.—Yes. That is about twelve or thirteen miles from me, but in the same township. There is no apparent difference in the soil in just looking atit. The srees stand the winter very well there, too. Mr. Wriacut, of Renfrew.—lIs it near the shore ? Mr. Broxovski—No. There is no apparent difference in the situation, slope, or anything else. That is the most remarkable part of it. I think the Snow apple is beginning to spot very badly, and in the winter the bark seems to break down near the ground, worse than any other variety. The Mackintosh Red seems to run out a little, and the bark cracks. There is a tree called the Gideon, which I got a couple of years. ago, and it seems to give great promise. . Dr. AYLESWORTH, Sr., of Collingwood.—My experience is varied, and not over successful. Mr. Cox’s statement that all kinds of apples in a general way succeed here is correct—that is under suitable arcumstances, but in my experience I have found both the Baldwin and the Greening a failure through the black heart. The PresipEnt.—Have you any special varieties you like ? ' Dr. AyLEswortH.—I have a variety of seedlings that I value very highly, and one of which Dr. Hoskins, who I had hopes of seeing heré, has a very high opinion. Some six years ago he stated’ in the Rural New Yorker that he hada seedling which he esteemed very highly, grafts of which he would send to any one sending him the postage. I sent a shinplaster, as we call it, to him, and he sent me about a dozen. I suc- ceeded with two, one of which is still alive, and which I value very highly. Itis an early apple, ripening in the latter end of the month of August. It is semi-transparent, and the first apple, or the largest of the first apples 1 got from it, was eleven inches in circumference, and weighed, T think, eight and a ha!f ounces, al people who tasted it considered it almost equal toa peach. I have also this seedling of my own which I think just as much of ; Dr. Stevens and some others have tasted the fruit and think very highly of it. _ I am grafting from both of these, and intend to propagate them if possible. Mr. GriLFovte, of Collingwood.—Although I am not a fruit grower, I handle a good many apples, and my choice for good keeping varieties is the Northern Spy, which I find a very satisfactory apple to handle. The Presipent.—Do you find they are grown in large quantities around here ? Mr. GitroyLe.—Not a great many in this immediate neighbourhood, but between here and Meaford, say within ten or twelve miles, they seem to be a greater success. The PrestpEnt.—Do you find there is a belt of country in which it succeeds better than in other places ? Mr. GitroyLe.—I cannot speak as to that; I have not been in the localities, and only know that it is from that vicinity they come to this market. I do not know any- thing at all about the culture of apples. Mr. Stewart, of Dunedin.— Where I live we can grow any kind of tree almost, and two miles from us they cannot grow any tree at all. Our soil is a mixture—heavy and light, and for drainage it is splendid. I think the King of Tompkins is the best apple there ; we find it hardy. The Alexander and the Wagener, also do very well, the latter will bear the second year and continue on. The Red “Astrachan is a very g good apple, 93 and the Baldwin dces- very well with us; mine is only just commencing, but with my neighbours it does splendidly. I think the difference between our section and the other I have spoken of is occasioned altogether by the soil; the other is high and level, ours high and rolling. Colverts stand there all right. . The PrestpENt.—Do you grow the Snow Apple? Mr. Stewarr.—Yes, but last year it spotted badly. I find other varieties also spot, but the Talman Sweet did not spot last year. The Baldwin, I believe, is a hard apple to grow in some places, but it is a good regular bearer and a good keeper. It is not hardy enough for our section unless top-grafted on some hardy stock. I have a neigh- bour who says the King of Tompkins County is a little tender, but I say it is not, and _ we only live 120 rods apart, so you see it takes a man to judge for himself, and not to listen to all he hears. ; Dr. AyLEswortH, Sr.—‘ Prove all things.” (Laughter.) Mr. Srewart.—If a man listens to everything he hears, he will never have an orchard. Mr. Moser ty, of Collingwood.—I cannot call myself either an apple grower or an apple exporter, though | take a great interest in fruit generally, but I have listened with much interest to what has been said by the different gentlemen regarding the class of apples that can be grown in these counties. One of. the early varieties spoken of, the Red Astrachan, is no doubt a fine apple and a prolific grower, but I would not advise anyone to grow more than one or two trees of it, just for home use and local consumption ; be- yond that it is valueless. When it ripens it is a beautiful apple to eat, but the moment it gets in the slightest degree over ripe it is almost like a sponge. and valueless for any purpose whatever. Another apple mentioned, the Duchess of Oldenburg, is, so far as my experience goes, a most prolific grower. I have a tree that is full of apples every year—beautiful apples. It is slightly later than the Red Astrachan, and it is an apple that keeps a little longer, but it also, you may say, is an apple valuable only for home use and local consumption. It has struck me that in choosing trees for an orchard ' people are apt instead of taking the experience of others as a guide to what are the best varieties for keeping and exporting, to take the book that is presented to them by the fruit man, and choose what in the illustrations seems to be the handsomest’and biggest apple, thinking that when they have got that they will have something no one else has, and be able to make a good deal out of it, instead of looking for an apple of good keeping qualities, suitable for export. I was talking to a gentleman the other day whom I had met at the Queen’s Hotel, Toronto, who came from Oregon, and among other things he told me that they had at times immense quantities of apples there, that were rotting on the ground. I inquired the reason, and found it was just about what I have stated. These farmers had raised a quantity of apples not fit to export, and although they had an enormous quantity of them they were valueless, because no one would buy them, and all the time and money spent in raising them was lost. It seems to me to be of the greatest importance to find out the apples that are going to be exporting apples, and those which will keep for the winter, and for fruit growers to turn their attention to such varieties. Then there will be a market for the fruit grown’ in this anc other parts of the country where perhaps the market at present is small. If that were done I am satis- fied that the apples grown in this section—the townships of Oollingwood, Nottawasaga, St. Vincent and probably others—would produce enormous quantities of apples, which would prove a source of wealth to them. The soil is peculiarly adapted for it, the formation being almost entirely limestone, which, I take it, is a good formation for fruits. of all kinds. In the town here we of course cannot grow apples to any great extent, the soil being almost altogether sand. In my own garden apples are growing very well, though not to the same extent they would, perhaps, if the soil were a little stronger. We have very little soil over our rock here, six or seven inches in some places, and in others seven or eight feet, but the whole of this country is underlaid with solid rock, which in some places crops out through the surface. We find, however, that trees grow very well. Much of this land which gentlemen have spoken of as not being adapted to apple growing, although apparently dry and sandy on top, may be springy down below —a hard, cold, springy subsoil. Not being a fruit grower myself it would be difficult 94 —_ for me to give as good an opinion with regard to the influences on fruit that would have to be grown for export as some of the gentlemen of more experience, but I am satisfied that what we have to turn our attention to is growing fruit suitable for export, and I am confident we could produce any quantity of them in this part of the country, and I am also sure that this will have to become to a very great extent an apple or fruit country—that we shall have to turn our attention more and more to that branch of industry. Now, there is an apple grown in New Brunswick, the name of which I forget, which is a very good apple, and which I do not think is grown up here at all. It is exceedingly good for exportation. The Annapolis Valley, of Nova Scotia, sends out an enormous quantity of apples every year, and I do not see why we should not here. We do not export apples to the extent we should, and I think one of the reasons is that we grow a great quantity of apples that are of no use, and, in many cases, a mere loss of time and money to the farmer who raises them. If these were replaced by varieties suitable for export, buyers would come in amongst us and make a business of securing them, instead of, as at present, the farmer marketing a few bushels of his own. If we had a large quantity of fruit of that kind people would come up here and make a business of buying it—perhaps on the trees. I think it is very important for farmers to be apprised of what goes on in these meetings, in order that they may ascer- tain of their own knowledge, or by the experience of ther neighbours in different sections of the country, the different kinds that succeed under varying circumstances, because it takes a tree a Jong time to grow—in the case of the Northern Spy you have to wait ten years before you get a crop. Therefore they do not want to plant varieties that are useful only for domestic and local purposes, but such varieties as a have a value for exportation. The Presipent.—In the course of this discussion one point has been “etnies in my mind ; that is the necessity for thorough underdraining. In all the localities in which the speakers were uncertain on this point it seems to me that it is a necessity. I think it would be pretty hard to find a tract of land where underdrainage would not do some good, and even on the rolling land where you are successful you would be still more successful—your trees would be healthier and the fruit finer if a thorough system of underdrainage were adopted. After a time, when the land has been thoroughly under- drained and ‘cultivated, it may be found that some of the varieties at present considered not hardy enough in this section wiil prove sufficiently hardy to be successfully grown. However, we have coming into the market a great many varieties of excellent apples which will be quite hardy ‘enough for any of these’ sections. I think Mr. Moberly has struck the keynote. There is no doubt at all that in other sections of the country as well as this farmers have been planting varieties they ought never to have planted. As a rule one or two early trees for the early summer are quite suflicient for home use, and three or four at the outside would be quite sufficient of fall fruit. What is wanted is winter fruit, not late fall, because we can now ship all winter to the foreign markets. We do not find a sufficient quantity of the long keeping varieties, and I would advise those who have too many trees of the early kinds to top graft them with some well known standard winter variety, such as succeeds best in their particular locality, and commands the best price in the foreign markets. I think by this course they would be encouraged to go much more extensively into fruit growing. Our markets are increas- ing rapidly year after year, and by planting such varieties as are well known to be suc- cessful in your own particular variety,—for which you must rely on your eyes and the evidence of your neighbours—and which are in demand in foreign parts, I think you will find it profitable ; bearing in mind always to begin by thoroughly underdraining. Dr. AYLEswortH, Jr.—Some eleven years ago I planted 900 apple trees in a very favourable position on the side of the mountain, thoroughly drained naturally, and facing the east. I planted the Northern Spy, the Golden Russet, the Baldwin, and the Green- ing. The first two have done exceptionally well. The Baldwin and Greening, I think, from the character of the trees supplied, are largely a failure ; but there are some splendid specimens of each kind. I have also planted two or three each of several other varieties : the Snow, Red Astrachan, Talman Sweet, and two or three others, the names of which I do not remember just now, all of which have done well. 95 The Srcretary.—There is a variety spoken very highly of in Maine, which I don’t think anyone in Canada has tested; it is the McClellan. A gentleman says that o seventy varieties he tried, it was the most successful. I would like to know if anyone has tried it here ? ee The Presipent.—There is another apple which is not grown here, which, in Maine, is one of their very best—the Nodhead. I have seen apples from some sections here called the Nodhead, but they are not at all like it. Their’s is a long-keeping, very fine winter apple, and has a good flavour. The McClellan, too, is a good keeper, and a high coloured apple. It is grown all over the State of Maine, and the eastern part of New Hampshire, in almost every orchard. Mr. A. M. Smira.—I would like to know if the Ben Davis is grown here ? Mr. Cox.—It is grown here upon the face of the mountain, and it does splendidly. At one o’clock the meeting adjourned until 2.30 p.m., and on reassembling, the question drawer was opened, and the following queries discussed :— VALUE OF APPLES FOR FEEDING MILCH COWS. .—Of what value are apples for feeding milch cows? Mr. Cro1t.—I have used apples for that purpose, but my experience is that they are very poor feed. I thought afterwards that a little corn would have done much more good than the apples. I fed them raw, but if cooked and mixed with grain, they might have done better. Some of my neighbours say their cows do not give such a large flow of milk on apples. The Secrerary.— Have you tried meal with them? Mr. Croit.—No. I think that way it might have been better. The Secretary.—At our last meeting Prof. Panton stated that when mixed With bran, pea meal, or chopped stuff, they made a very good food, and a gentleman who had used them moderately in that way, said their use had been productive of very good results, and believed it would pay any man to grow apples if only for that purpose. Col. McGitu.—You would have to cook your apples. then to get the full effect of them on the flow of milk. They have a decided influence if you cook the apples and mix them with meal ; they are’productive of improvement in the flow of milk—that has been my experience. A MemBer.—Does it pay for the cost and extra labour of cooking ? Col. McGint.—Yes, if you were going to feed apples, and expected to get any benefit from them. Mr. Beapie.—If you could market them at a merely nominal price it would pay better to sell them and feed meal. HOW TO DESTROY CATERPILLARS. Q.—What is the best way to exterminate caterpillars ; I have tried soft soap, but it does not affect those remaining in the web ? Mr. Breatit.—You will remember someone saying some time ago that eternal vigi- lance was the price of apples ; it is certainly so in regard to these caterpillars. I like the plan of looking for them in the early morning, when they are in the web in the fork of the tree. It is only as the day advances and the weather warms, that they begin to travel out and feed. At evening, too, you will find them in the web, and you can take a forked stick and pull web, caterpillar, and all down. Another thing is to look for the cluster of eggs on the twigs early in March, before the leaves are out. If your orchard has been at all infested the year before, it is probable some of the moths have escaped and laid , 96 ——————————————<————S Se their eggs on the twigs—I suppose you are all familiar with that fact. They are easily seen as you look through the top of the tree by projecting the limbs of the tree against the sky, and with the scissors on the end of a pole, you can clip them off and bring them down. If they are left on the ground it does not matter much, though I usually make sure of them by gathering them all up—except a few that may escape me in the grass or weeds ; they cannot eat grass, however, and soon perish. There is another way of getting at these fellows, of another class,—I am speaking now of the tree tent caterpillar. There is another variety which I may call a tent caterpillar, though it does not make a tent. - They were very abundant about London and St. Thomas a few years ago—the country was infested with them. They come from the forest, and go by the name of the forest tent caterpillar. They make a very slight web indeed, but they have the habit of gather- ing on the trunk of the tree some time during the twenty-four hours, in a great heap— seem to be built on top of one another, and you can easily manage to crush them. Ihave mentioned these to cover the two varieties of what are known as tent caterpillars. These last do not make a tent, so you cannot get at them always in the manner spoken of, with the forked stick, but the moth lays its eggs in a ring, and the ring of eggs can be cut off early in the spring the same as the tree tent caterpillar. BEST APPLES FOR FOREIGN MARKETS. The discussion of the apple was then resumed, having in view “ Varieties of foreign markets,” as follows :— é The PrestpEnt.—This is a question in regard to which, in different localities, there is room for considerable variation. The subject is one in which I have had some amount of experience for a good many years, and in. speaking of the best varieties fer foreign markets, I should in the first place include those possessed of good keeping qualities— winter varieties. Take, for instance, the Baldwin, out of which a good deal of money has been made in all the sections in which it has been grown. - The Rhode Island Greening, an apple which some years ago was low down in price on the British market, is now ris- ing, owing to its good keeping qualities. A good specimen of the Rhode Island Greening will now stand alongside the Baldwin, in price, in almost any of the British markets. It was formerly objected to on account of being green, the British taste being for a highly coloured appie, but they are now getting over that as an objection, and looking more to the quality, than the appearance. We all know that for keeping purposes, for our own use, most of us would prefer the Greening to the Baldwin. Then there is an apple that is grown pretty largely throughout this Province, and which has been considered, and. bought by shippers, as a fall apple—the Twenty-Ounce; it is a valuable apple for the’ British market where it is well known, and commands a very high price. There was a time when in Britain they wanted a. medium sized apple for dessert purposes, but now they want to get as. much apple as they possibly can for the price, and large apples are in demand and bring a high price. The Fallawater, for instance, brings a high price, though it has very little colour. The King of Tompkins County, which has not only a very fine appearance, but also excellent qualities, is much sought for at good prices. The Northern Spy, too, is a great favourite there in any of the markets you go to; it is an apple of very high quality, and therefore has held its own. Last year it was spotted pretty badly, but notwithstanding that, it stood pretty well to the front of Canadian apples in the market. The Ben Davis, although not a very large apple, is one that holds the market very well, simply because it is an apple of good average size and colour, and fine appearance. Still I would hardly advise growers to plant very freely of Ben Davis, because the quality is rather low, and I do not think it will continue to hold the market very long. I think in Britain they will, by and by, begin to know and appreciate high quality in an apple, in- stead of looking merely to colour, as was formerly the case. The Ribston Pippin is an apple I would like to see grown largely wherever it will succeed, and with it I might mention the Blenheim Pippin, or Blenheim Orange, as it is sometimes called. Both these apples command the highest price in the markets of Great Britain ;- probably they are at 97 a the top of the list for price ; and we can grow them much finer here than any they can produce there. I think it is probable that the Ribston Pippin and Blenheim Orange are more extensively grown in the Annapolis Valley, of Nova Scotia, than any other variety, and they make more out of them than any other variety, too. They are apples of such good quality that they are sure to hold the market. A Memper.—Do they compare favourably with ours ? The Presipent.—They do. Then there is the Wagener ; it is a little on the small side, and is not sufficiently well known on the markets to be appreciated as it ought, but there is no doubt it will be appreciated as it becomes better known abroad. The Ameri- can Golden Russet will always hold its own, but it should be stored here and shipped towards the spring of the year in order to realize its proper value. The Roxbury Russet, too, should be held late here, and if shipped then, will command a very high price on the British or other foreign markets. It is an apple which is sold by the Nova Scotians by a different name—the Nonpariel, which, [ believe, is one and the same with the Roxbury Russet. The Spitzenberg is an apple that would bring a good price, but there is something about the local .Spitzenberg as a shipper, that I do not understand; I found it last year a very poor shipper, arriving in England in very poor condition ; barrel after barrel that were opened were in a state of decay. It is an apple of the very highest quality as a dessert apple, but it is one that growers of experience do not care very much for growing, “being a slow grower and a poor bearer. The Swayzie Promme Grise I tested last year in the London market for the Christmas trade—I put some of them on the market on the 15th of December for the Christmas holidays ; I packed them in small barrels known as half-barrels. After explaining them pretty well to buyers on the market, they sold for twenty-seven shillings per half-barrel, that is fifty-four shillings per barrel—the ordinary fruit barrrel. I gave the people there to understand that to grow that particular kind of apple we would have to get at least thirty shillings per half-barrel. -It is a very small apple, and it takes a great many to fill a barrel, and in growing a large orchard I think the grower would run a great risk in order to make any money. It is an apple which I suppose most of you know, and is pos- sessed of the highest quality known in an apple. A good many confound it with the Pomme Grise, or Montreal Pomme Grise, which is quite a different apple, though of very high quality, too, and which should bring a high price on the foreign markets. There is no demand for sweet apples, and I would not advise anyone to ship the Talman Sweet to the British market ; they don’t want it there. We have other varieties of apples,—our early apples—the Duchess of Oldenburg, for instance, out of which, if some of the steam- ship companies would start a line of cold storage, as much money could be made as out of any other variety grownin Canada. You would have to pick them a little ahead of time, but the Duchess will keep very well when picked a little on the early side, and.colour nicely on the way; I believe there would be money in shipping in that way at that season of the year. At that season in England they handle principally German and Belgian apples, which would not at all compare with the Duchess. I tested them in small quantities and realized good prices: twenty-four shillings per barrel in small packages. Then the Fameuse, if grown clean and clear from spot, would be appreciated in the British market ; they would be willing to pay a figure that would pay the grower here. If grown clean, the Fameuse can be shipped in the ordinary way, without cold storage, and will arrive there very well—that is the Snow apple. The Colvert also arrived in very good condition, and brought fair prices. The Wealthy would ship there very well, indeed, and would also realize a paying figure. The Cranberry Pippin would ship there very well, and sell well. I also saw some Mackintosh Reds there which were brought from the vicinity of Oshawa, and which, I think, were sold very well. The Mann apple sold very well, indeed; it is a long keeper, and should not be shipped until spring, when it would bring a high price. I sold the Ontario at a general average of twenty-two shillings per barrel for what I did sell. The King of Tompkins always sells high, with the Ribston Pippin and the Blenheim. The SecreTary.—What about these hardy varieties, Cellini and Fall Queen ? The Presipent.—They have not been tried there—at all events I have never met them in the market. Nor the Wallbridge, I think, at present. 7 (¥,G.) 98 The Secrerary.—I don’t think there has been very much money in growing the Baldwin for shipping, of late at all events, if we may judge by its conduct with us in the Niagara District. We cannot get any apples off our trees any more; they do not. produce any fruit of any consequence at all, and what there has been is not at all up to its former size or appearance. I have a neighbour who has a large orchard almost entirely Baldwins, who feels almost ruined by them. It is a fine, big orchard, trees. twenty-five or thirty years old, and beautiful trees too; but he gets no fruit in it, and what he does get is not fit to ship ; he has been selling it at fifteen cents a bushel to the canning factory, which is very discouraging in an apple of which we have been planting very largely. This year we hoped to have had a large crop, but instead of that the promise is of a small crop again. The Greening is giving us better satisfaction, and it shows up splendidly for this year—the fruit looks beautifully clear, and the trees are well loaded The Greening yields more fruit than any other variety, and if, as you say, it is going to be in demand in the old country, it will be very profitable for us. We have one old tree of Greenings that has given us fifteen or sixteen barrels several times, and on one occasion we picked twenty barrels off it. It is about eighty years old. In regard to the King, I have quite a large number of trees of good size, and if jt would only bear well I would think it was one of the best, it is such a beautiful apple, and when you open up a barrel has a most agreeable aroma. In shipping it always returns the highest prices of any, but we fail to get enough fruit to make us think very highly of it. The Ribston does well in our section ; always clear and beautiful, and bears well. The Spitzenberg, however, which has been spoken of, is a perfect failure, worse, far worse than the Baldwin. I do not remember that you mentioned the American Golden Russet, of which we think very highly ; it is beautifully clear and has borne most abundantly, especially after the tree reaches its age it does remarkably well. The PresipeNt.—There is a gentleman here from Glasgow, Mr. Cecil, who can tell us that the feeling of the British markets is strongly in favour of Canadian over all other apples. Mr. Cecin.—I am not a practical apple grower. My business is selling apples, in which there is a large business done during three months of the year, and I may say that the prospect of profit this year is exceedingly good. A good many of the varieties which have been mentioned here to-day are not known on the Glasgow market, and [ think the people there want to be educated up to a higher taste. About the only varieties that are known there are the Colvert, Baldwin, Russet, King of Tompkins and Northern Spy. 1 believe that in the course of time people will begin to appreciate Canadian apples even more than they do now, especially if they are picked very carefully, which in Belguim, or even the United States of America, is not usually done. I think the Canadians have a better name for packing than any people from whom we get apples. vi Mr. Beatt.—The President has named sixteen varieties. Does he recommend any- one who is setting out an orchard of two or three hundred trees to set out all these varieties 4 The PrestpENT.—By no means. If they could adopt and plant two varieties it would be better than sixteen. What they require to do is to plant only those which in their own particular locality succeed best, and confine themselves principally to winter fruit. Mr. A. M. Smiru.—Suppose all the varieties you mentioned would succeed well ? The Presrpent.—Then I would select from the sixteen those out of which I thought the most money could be realized. Dr. AYLESworTH, Sr., of Collingwood.—I should be inclined, if going largely into apple growing, to confine myself to one variety—the Russet. It is an early bearer, and what is more important, its keeping qualities are great. A great fruit exporter who was | here a few years ago advised me to confine myself to Russets. I don’t think it would pay me at 75 years of age to go into it, but if I were young I should go largely into apple growing in this part of the country. I planted some Russets six years ago im my garden here, and last year, five years after planting, I had some fruit, and here (producing specimens) is some of last year’s crop off those little trees. And now, while s 99 ———[———[—[— 50 5 ooo I am on my feet, here is my seedling that I was speaking of this morning. (Showing seedling). Col. McGiuiu.—There is a very large orchard of American Golden Russets about a mile and a half or two miles from my place—some six or seven acres set out entirely with them, and although it has been there twelve or fourteen years I don’t think they have gathered one bushel of apples per tree in that orchard since it was set out. The trees are healthy and grow well, but it is very seldom in our section (Oshawa) that you can get such specimens as this—not one year out of ten. I have grown them for the last forty years. The Presipent.—The moral in that case is not to grow American Golden Russets in that section. Col. McGitu.—Yes, there is‘ no money in it, They are good keepers and high flavoured, but we cannot fill the barrels. A Memper (referring to Dr. Aylesworth’s specimens).—Were these grown in Collingwood ? Dr. AyLEswortH, Sr.—Right in my garden. The Secrerary.---I think the orchard of which Col. McGill speaks has not had time yet. I have had a good many trees of the same variety planted twenty-five years, and it is only for the last five years they have been actually paying. They are now bearing excellently. Col. McGiiu.—My trees have been out forty years, and they have not paid me yet, BEST MODES OF GATHERING APPLES. Mr. BeapLe.—The easiest way is to shake them down. The Presipent.—I am sorry to hear you say that in the presence of a Glasgow merchant. The Secretary.—The Americans suspend canvas under the tree, and shake the apples into that—they have a patent on it. Col. McGiiu.—We sell our orchard by the barrel, and gather our own apples. We gather them with a ladder, into a basket holding about half a bushel, and put them into the barrel carefully as we gather them, always taking care to gather them when dry. I generally pack them myself, and my sons and the hired man gather them. Then we turn them over on their side, and store them, if they are to be shipped before the heavy frost, in a shed, where they are kept from the rain. We used at one time to gather in bags, and sometimes we would get them jammed or shaken—they come out best in _ baskets. The Secretary.—I suppose we all follow very much the same plan Col. McGill has described, using a ladder and a basket. I have found it a very good idea to have spikes in the bottom of the ladder, which is a great help in raising it, and will give it a good hold in the ground. A long ladder is apt at times to slide, and I have found these spikes a great convenience. I have tried several modes of gathering my crop: some- times we have gathered them into a number of baskets and carried them indoors where we had lots of room, and packed them there on the floor, but of late I have practised gathering them immediately into the barrels in the orchard. I have also tried leaving them in piles, but that I found productive of a good deal of trouble. Lately, as I have said, I have tried this picking them immediately into the barrel, and heading them up, taking them into a cool place and leaving them there on their sides. Then when the packing time comes, late in‘the season, I empty them out two’ barrels at a time upon a packing table or upon straw on the floor. I have been using a packing table about twelve feet long with sides all round it, and an inclination so that the apples will be disposed to roll towards me. Two persons can very easily empty out a couple of barrels on this table and throw out the poor specimens, and so, quickly cull them over, separating them into the different classes, and putting them into the barrels and marking them according to their grade. I think that, generally speaking, is one of the most 100 ———— a satisfactory methods I have tried. The only difficulty is that if the weather is very close in the place where they are stored—if it is not cool enough—they are apt to ripen a little faster than if left in heaps on the grass or same other such place. With summer apples, the course is a little different. I ship them away in baskets. The Red Astrachan trees I go over a good many times because they ripen so unevenly, and by picking them off early they sell remarkably well. It pays to gather the early apples as they ripen. I think that a picker, such as was shown in the Horticulturist is a good and useful tool for gathering Red Astrachans, at least before the trees get too large. I have them brought down from the trees in that way and placed in baskets on the ground, then a boy comes along with an express waggon and takes them inside the packing house, where they are picked over and classified. The extra select are packed in twelve quart baskets, and the second grade in barrels. BEST MODES OF PACKING APPLES. Col. McGinu.—I always have the packing of my own orchard and some of one or two neighbours. We invariably pack in flour barrels, and with a press, pressing them down. There is as much injury in pressing them too hard as in not pressing them hard enough. lf you press too hard you destroy the outside course, especially on the head. We always place the bottom rows down, beginning at the head end, making that the bottom and taking out the bottom of the barrel, which leaves the stem end always up to view. We then put them in carefully, and if there are any imperfect specimens we throw them to one side, and a good many are thrown out in that way. We shake the barrel carefully about every half bushel, so as to get them close together, and round it up nicely so that the head willbe perhaps two or three inches from the chime, and then we press them down with the press. If they are small apples we do not round them up so much as large ones, because the smail ones pack closer. The Presipent.—As a matter of fact, where a barrel of apples has been properly packed by a scientific packer it should be impossible on opening either end to tell from which end it has been packed. Choose a solid place on the ground and place your barrel upon a solid piece of plank. Lay the first course of apples with the stem end down. The packer should not take special samples for this course, but just take them as they come, and place them so as to make a solid row on the bottom. The next row also should be put in carefully, with the blossom end down. The barrel should be care- fully shaken down on that solid plank after each basketful. When the packer comes to the top of the barrel he evens them off according to the variety. One variety will press down closer than another, and that is where a little judgment and experience is required. A man must know every variety he is packing in order to know how many to put in the barrel ; whether he will fill it to the chine, an inch above the chine, or even further. Then the last row has to be so placed as to be in an oval position before you put the press on, with the stems up, so that when you put the press on they will press down evenly and level, and afterwards on opening the barrel you cannot tell which end you commenced at. That is a barrel packed properly, and it will carry, and carry thoroughly. If the apples before packing have been what we call sweated—and the best place to sweat apples is on the ground, they should, if possible, remain on the ground for a week after being picked from the tree—they will carry much better, Of course in wet weather they are better taken in to the barn floor or some other convenient place, but as a rule they should rentain for a week or ten days after being picked ; the skin toughens in that time. I find quite a difference in the Northern Spy, which has such a tender skin, in places where they are left on the ground to toughen and get through this sweating process—they will carry much better. Before packing, the first thing todo is to make up your mind how many grades you are going to have in the pile from which you are packing. There will be two grades at least, and the chances are, not more than three. For instance, take a Baldwin grown on the inside of a tree, that is apt to be rather green. That will be one grade. All the medium sized apples —-have them all the one size as much as possible,—and pretty high colored, that is 101 another grade. Grown at the top of the tree or on the outside limbs apples will be much smaller, but high in color. That will be your third grade. ) Duty: | Value Duty. : $ C. $ G $ Cs $ - ‘e. Groom Erulthen, sees cco ek otek each Sone sate | 642,967 00 123,321 00 | 929,133 00 165,886 00 Ininanb trees: splauts: iets 2... : ssja5- tis aloe 198,340 09 41,006 00 227,346 00 43,597 00 - Field and garden seéds...........25..2-0-8- 333,357 00 | 50,017 60 | 714,849 00 107,470 00 Potatoes and vegetables .....:....45....... 220,578 00 | 40,645 00 415,780 00 82,330 00 Barbra arse 7, SR aE MELE 1,395,242 00 | 254,989 00 || 2,287,108 00 | 399,233 00 From this statement it appears that the imports of the last three years from the United States exceed those of the previons three by $891,866—the excess in the valua- tion of green fruits being $286,166; of fruit trees, plants, etc., $29,006 ; of field and garden seeds, $381,492 ; and of vegetables, $195,202. These figures, it appears to me, demonstrate that the present duties do not serve the interests of the Canadian producers by shutting out United States imports or even reducing their volume. A philosophic historian has said that extirpation is tbe only persecution which can be successful, or even not destructive of its own object. Well, I am disposed to believe that prohibition is the only protection which can protect in the case of the trade we are considering. The fact is that only in a very small degree do American products come into competition with the Canadian at all. The fruits and vegetables which we import from the United States are chiefly those which ripen earlier than ours, and which or dealers import and our people consume because they can he got nowhere else. The best information I can obtain from men in the trade is that while imported strawberries supply our city markets a month earlier than the home grown fruit, they cease to compete when the latter comes in. Being brought a longer distance they have lost treshness and flavor, and besides, the duty of four cents per pound becomes prohibitory in its eff-ct. The same observation is generally true of apples, plums, pears, peaches and vegetables ; they are importe! from the Southern and Middle States for a few weeks before our own mature, and with the craving appetite for new fruits and vegetables which the diet of a long winter begets, they are bought up eagerly at any price in reason, They compete for a brief season only with the native products, not merely because the trade is made unprofitable by the duty, but because they are by comparison of a poorer quality. If any proof of the correctness of this statement were needed, I have no doubt that it would be speedily forthcoming from the members of this Association ; but let me quote an impartial authority—the report of McKittrick, Hamilton & Co., of England—on American apples for the season 18x6-7. Here is what they say -— “Canada, as usual, has been to the fore, and we have had really perfect parcels landed here, for which high prices have heen obtained. The early supplies from the Dominion male about same prices as those from the United States, but once their fall fruit was in a condition for shipment they immediately took the lead, and while Boston, Maine and New York Baldwins made 10/3 to 15/3, Canadians sold for 16/ to 18/3. This lead was maintained through the season, the general average of prices being very high.” And because it possesses this fine quality, a degree of perfection hardly equalled anywhere else on the continent, Canadian fruit needs no tariff wall for its protection. We are able to compete with the American fruit growers at home or abroad, and I am persuaded that in the products of the orchard and garden, if in no other, it is the common interest of consumers and producers to favor a policy of unrestricted reciprocity with our neighbors. New York, Ohio and Michigan have not suffered by competition with each other, or by competition with sister States eastward, southward and westward, and the great centres of population in those States, growing greater every year, will maintain for all time the best of markets at our « oors. There is one other aspect of the question of trade with the United States to which I must refer, viz.: the relation of fruit and vegetables as articles ot diet to the health of our people ; and in looking up the best authorities on this subject I ought to say that I have been aided by my friend Dr. Bryce, the Secretary of the Provincial Board of Health. A high English authority, Dr. Wynter Blyth, of London, stated in a recent address that— The importance of cabbages, carrots, turnips, of apples, pears, raspberries and strawberries, is far more than their nutritive value; for without the addition of these substances, even while eating fresh meat, we are liable to decline in health and suffer from eruptions, while if we eat salt meat for any time and consume neither potatoes nor vegetables, nor fruits, then that terrible disease, scurvy, is imminent. Another authority whom I shall quote is Prof. de Chaumont, who in a lecture on Practical Dietetics (issued by the Council of the International Association of 1884) expressed practically the same opinions as Dr. Blyth. If the blood is in a proper healthy condition, he stated, it is alkaline; but if it gets into an unhealthy condition, chiefly through being deprived of vegetable food, then it becomes less alkaline, gets into a fluid condition, and the result is the disease we know in its extreme form as scurvy. And he goes on to say :— This disease in former years was the scourge of our navy, and it is on record that the channel fleet in the middle of the last century had sometimes come into Spithead with no less than 10,000 men disabled by scurvy alone ; and one of the reasons why the enormous hospital at Haslar was built to hold 2,000 patients was on account of the tremendous stress put upon all hospital accommodation by the enormous number of scurvy patients. This condition of things was remonstrated against by the medical officers of the navy, who pointed out the remedy at hand by the use of vegetable acids a long time before it was adopted, but as soon as it was adopted the result was magical. Scurvy disappe:red from the navy altogether, and that immense hospital at Haslar was left with only a few cases compared with what it was intended to accommo- date. But 1 should mention that scurvy has by no means disappeared entirely, and so far is it from disappearing that if cases are carefully investigated in ord nary life, even among the better clas-es, we shall tind symptoms of scurvy from time to time. A great many people dislike vegetables, and even dislike fruits, and neglect the use of them. Others from sheer ignvrance do not use them, and the result is that again and again diseases that are apparently caused by quite other means are aggravated and complicated by a certain amount of this scorbutic taint. It hardly seems necessary to point the lesson which these statements of eminent men so unmistakably teach. The use of fruits and vegetables in the diet of our people is so essential that the policy which makes these articles scarce and dear can only be regarded as inhuman and stupid in an eminent degree. We are proud of our north-land, with its bracing climate, its great lakes. its rich heritage of farm land and forest, and proudest of all of the men who have made and are making it. But let us never close our minds to the fact thit it is and ever must bea north-land, where winter reigns half the year, and thit we can ill afford to make that winter longer still by a barrier raised to shut out the bounties of niture. And in our relations with our neighbor may we learn the wisdom of the philosophic maxim, “ that of all the agencies of civilization and progress of the human race commerce is the most efficient.” Mr. E. Morven (Drummondville).—I live on the frontier, and my market for fruit is in the United States very largely. Iam able to compete with the United States, and de compete with the United States’ fruit growers in their own markets. I sell most of my fruit there, and get my money from there, and I hope the day will come when the fruit growers of Canada will at least treat our neighbors to the south of us with the same liberality that we receive from them. 158 a The Prestpent.—There is no doubt the question raised by the paper read is a very important one, and one that is receiving a good deal of attention trom public men at the present time. We see it every day, and we read something about it every day, and as far as my experience goes it extends pretty much to the export of apples. In the other fruits I have exported some to the United States. There is no doubt about it, as far as apples are concerned we are not only not afraid of the American competition, but we are not afraid of any country in the world. (Applause.) We have met them all ; we have met them successfully ; and the prices current in the houses in Britain will show that we command the highest prices known for apples. No matter how they pack them, how they cull them, how they select them, we find that our apples lead all in prices, (Applause.) The Americans no doubt come nearer to us in competition than any other country that we have met with as yet, and any country that we know of. The New York State apples generally we find the very best ; also the Maine Baldwins, and Nodheads from the State of Maine, are very fine, and they culland pack them very well indeed. They come pretty closely in competition with us in the markets of Britain ; but, taking all the markets combined, and taking good, had and indifferent as cargoes go, I would be on the safe side in saying there is a usual difference of from two to three shillings a barrel in our favor. Mr A. G. Mvutr.—I would like to ask the President whether, when he estimated the difference in the selling prices of the Canadian and the American barrel, the difference in the size of the barrel was considered in the quotations. ‘ The Prestpent-—That is considered. The American barrels vary very much. They have mostly two sizes—two bushels and three pecks and three-bushel barrels. Our barrels now under the Act are three-bushel barrels) The two-bushel-and-three-peck barrel of the American trade rules very low in the market; it is sold at a very great disadvantage. They make a much better proportion out of their three-bushel barre] ; but I am speaking of the proportion between that barrel and ours—between their three-bushel barrel and ours. The difference between the other and ours is very much larger indeed, but then they are selling the other at a very great disadvantage to themselves as compared with their three-bushel barrel. GRAPE GROWING IN ONTARIO. Papers on discussions on various aspects of grape growing then occupied the attention of the meeting, the subject being introduced by Prof. Brown with the following paper on GRAPES FROM HIGH ALTITUDES IN ONTARIO. It is now six years since a committee of this association planted some ninety-six varieties of grape vines at the Ontario Experimental Farm. The object was a severe testing of those considered to be of value to the Province— because a situation 850 feet above Lake Ontario, and therefore about 1200 feet above sea level, is likely to be very trying to fruit of any kind. Recently, Professor Panton, our Botanist, gave a short bulletin on this subject, which necessarily, by its briefness, could not bring out some points that I trust may now be gathered. The ground selected has a, southern aspect, without any shelter whatever ; the soil a clay loam, somewhat stiff and decidedly spongy with hillside water. The management has been to grow two canes from each vine, tying up earefully every season so that the young and bearing wood is trained in every direction upon four lines of fence wire five feet in height. This method seemed best adapted where it is necessary, as with us, to lay down and cover for winter protection. We have manured and cultivated well. Pruning is undertaken end of October and beginning of November, as well as shoot pinching in summer, and nothing allowed to get higher thin the trellis, 159 Four hundred and forty vines were planted in 1881 and 210 in 1882, so that we had a total of 650—representing ninety-six varieties. The first thing to place on record is life and death, and the character of that life. GRAPE VINES PLANTED 1881-2. STRONG, VIGOROUS PLANTS. Agawam. Martha. Brighton. [ Missouri. Brant. Massasoit. Black Hawk Merrimac. Clinton. Nortons (Var). Champion. Noah. Cornucopia. ) Othello. Concord. Pocklington. Cynthiana. Rogers’ 28. Duchess. Rogers’ 33. Delaware. Rogers’ 41. Dracut Amber. Una. Elvira. | Uhland. Eva. Venango. Gaertner. Wilder. Hartford Prolific. (Not represented at Meeting). Herbert. Naomi. Ives’ Seedling. Barry. Jefferson. Pearl. Janesville. Maxatawney. Lindley. Cottage. Lady Washington. Vergennes. Mary Ann. Early Dawn. Moore’s Early. Eumelan. MEDIUM, IN VIGOR. Advance. Transparent. Amber. \ alter. Alvey. (Not represented ut Meeting.) Amber Queen. Canada. Faith. Dempsey 4. Jessica. Cayahoga. Lady. Isabella. New Haven. Creveling. Rogers’ No. 30. Echland. Rogers’ No. 39. Rogers’ No. 2. Salem. Worden, of excellent quality. Autonello. Grimes’ Golden. WEAK PLANTS. Autucheon, (Not represented at Meeting.) Black Eagle. | Telegraph. Eldorado. Monroe, Iona. Beauty. Rochester. | Senasqua. } Prentiss. 160 FAILURES. Centennial. Herbemont. Croton Rogers’ 5. Chasselas. Purity. Dempsey’s 18. Triumphant. Dempsey’s 25. Waverly. ‘ The second consideration is as to fruiting and ripening. Up to the end of 1886, and therefore with an experience of four years fruiting, it may surprise you to know that not more than a dozen of the eighty-six varieties that? lived—ten having failed—ripened {so"that they could be eaten. In October, 1886, the list stood thus: Lindley. | Eumelan. Delaware. Herbert. Moore’s Early. | Concord. Salem. | Clinton. Massasoit. | Brighton. Wilder. Agawam. Merrimac. Martha. Hence it is perfectly clear that the average season in such a position is not a safe grape growing one. Of the above, every one—Salem excepted, which is medinm—is on our hardy and vigorous list, so that the fact of their doing well at the Experimental Farm is evidence pretty certain that they would likely do well anywhere else in the Province. Looking to this, therefore, we are prepared to advise the following for hardiness, yield and flavour : Black. Brighton. Wilder. . Lindley. Worden. Agawam. Moore. White. Concord. Niagara, Barry. Lady. fed. Martha. Delaware. And thirdly, I have to submit evidence of the remarkable character of the season of 1887, as affecting these grapes, for in place of the dozen that it seems, we will be limited to on an average, no fewer than 70 varieties ripened well. Of these I could con- veniently bring to the meeting only 54, which you can now examine and prove practically. The earliest gathering was on 3rd September, the latest the 22nd, so that being all inside this month I have simply put the day of harvesting on the card along with the name, and whether it is a vigorous, medium, or weak plant. I shall say nothing about the character of the fruit which you are now to taste, but shall close with the order of ripening :— RIPENING—ONE WEEK INTERVAL. Most early in ripening :-— Janesville. Ives’ Seedling. May Red. Champion. Moore’s Early. Brant. Mary Ann. (Not in collection exhibited.) Black Hawk. | Early Dawn. Alvey. 161. Second most eurly :-— Othello. Rogers’ 39. Concord. New Haven. Cornucopia. Rogers’ 33. Delaware. Rogers’ 2. Eldorado. | Norton. ( Var.) Massasoit. Merrimac. Lady. Lindley. Jessica. Venango. Hartford Prolific, Autuchon. Faith. Brighton. Rochester. Third most early :— Amber Queen. Wilder. Dracut’s Amber. : Herbert. Eva. Lady Washington. Jefferson. Iona. Rogers’ 28. | Martha. Rogers’ 30. | (Not in exhibit.) Rogers’ 41. Telegraph. Uhland. Cottage. Cynthiana. | Isabella Duchess. Eumelan. Gaertner. Barry. Una. Creveling. Noah. Latest in ripening :— Missouri. Transparent. Salem.’ Amber. Lugawana. Elvira. Pocklington. Clinton. Agawam. I beg specially to draw your attention to the quality of Moore’s Early. Lindley. Massasoit. | Rogers’ 41. Lady. Salem. Jessica | Pocklington. The Presipent.—We have seen something from the Agricultural Farm this year that is of importance. It is a fine thing to bring the varieties all together in a section such as that—a very difficult section, indeed, to grow grapes to perfection. You cannot expect to find grapes coming from that section as fine in bunch or berry as you will find them in this section. It is a much more difficult thing to bring them there to a state of perfection. I visited the farm this year, and I was very much pleased indeed to see that their grapes were likely to ripen.- It is a very difficult thing in many of the western inland sections to ripen their grapes. In some they cannot ripen at all. This was an exceptional year. We would only expect that the earlier varieties would ripen at Guelph. They have ripened all varieties this year at the Model Farm; they can’t expect them to ripen every year. They can only ripen some varieties in a season such as we have just had ; it is quite an exception ; and as we have seen from the paper, a large bulk of the varieties spoken of have been comparatively worthless in years past. There is no doubt 11 (&.G.) 162 that they have accomplished, I think, all that could possibly be expected from that section or from any inland section within reach having the same advantages, or disadvantages rather, as far as grape culture is concerned. I think the audience would probably like to hear the paper of Mr. Beall before going into further discussion on the grape question. Then we will take the grape question up generally and hear from the authorities. GRAPE CULTURE AND TEMPERATURE. Mr. Beatt.—I fully agree with you as to this being an exceptional year, and it is for that reason I desire to place some figures before you. Mine is hardly a paper; it is “ Notes on Grape Culture and Temperature for the year 1887.” The past unusually dry and hot summer has afforded a good opportunity to ascertain with much certainty, the length of time and the quantity of heat required to ripen the varieties of grapes usually cultivated in this province. Careful notes have been taken in my grounds of the time of ripening of a few varie- ties ; and I am also enabled to give the number of days and the quantity of heat required for the maturity of each of the varieties named below. The time is computed from the 15th of May, that being about the time when the grape vine buds begin to expand; the time for uncovering the vines being about one week previous to that date. The fruit of the varieties named was fully ripe at the dates given. No. of Mean Name or VARIETY. Date of Ripening. | Days | Max. sens Heat Required.|Temp’ture Maria: Wer Soe 8 on oo ~ SRG eRe eee ns ees oe \August 31......---- 108 80.19 8660.73 Ta ON 2cTT «EC pects enn i Ro eet ne Bak? (Biker eee 111 80.04 8884.93 Maare’s Starly = 22>. sate. - 225 x. app ee eee 5 6... eee 114 80.05 9125.43 Billy cs. esac cae ae Fx eR! ee ee. 114 80.05 | 9125.43 yr Poe 8 ee ee ee cs 10 eke 118 79.57 9389.13 oS EES ie GORE ae VR ca kee eC. . aee 121 79.36 9603.03 WGAPSTS..- <2 ~~ oon ene se sce ene ence nies ees 3 9 cots owe a 123 79.21 9742.33 7 Ee FOr re a ees 2s Se See ene $F Lee eens 123 79.21 9742.33 TE ee ee eee eee ae “f (ieee 123 79.21 9742.33 Wergennes .. .. 52.2. 2 oe oop eee eee e ne esee eee = | eee 125 79 05 9871.93 ET a ee ee ee = >. ee ee 128 78.75 10080.43 AQAWAID.......-- 220s ee cee eee cece e cette eee e eee = : Se 132 78.17 10317 .23 The foregoing goes far to show that the estimate of the mean maximum daily tem- perature for the full period, which may generally be expected without serious frost, as given in the Canadian Horticultwrist for 1885, page 81, may be taken as being very nearly correct, i. ¢., that from the 15th of May to the Ist of October—138 days—the mean maximum daily temperature for the full period must be at least 70° to ripen the earliest varieties, such as Early Victor, Worden and Moore’s Early ; and that for the later varie- ties, viz., those ripening a little before but not later than the Concord, 72.5°, or a total of say, 10,000° will be necessary. Heat seems to be the most important factor in determining the time of ripening the grape, for we find from the foregoing figures that the excessive heat during the past sum- mer has shortened the period of growth fully two weeks, which gives another proof of the truthfulness of the proposition advanced by Boussingault, that ‘‘ the duration of the vegetation appears to be in the inverse ratio of the mean temperature ; so that if we mul- tiply the number of days during which a given plant grows in different climates, by the mean temperature of each, we obtain numbers that are very nearly equal.” It appears to me, however, that the mean maximum temperature of a given locality a better guide in the cultivation of grapes thanthe mean temperature. The mean tem- rature along the north shore of Lake Ontario and that of the high lands, varying from 20 to perhaps 60 miles north of the lake, are very nearly equal during the summer ; but he mean maximum temperature during the same period is many degrees higher inland than along the lake shore ; hence the reason why grape culture is so much more success- ful inland than along the north shore of Lake Ontario from Toronto eastward. The Presipent.—We would like to hear now from Mr. Pettit, who has grown a large number of varieties here. EXPERIENCE AT WINONA. Mr. M. Pertit then gave his experience at Winona with sixty or seventy varieties. Pretty nearly all of you know, he said, what grapes grow in this section; and we who grow in large quantities for market discuss grapes in a different way from what we have heard it done to-day. We consider them from their financial standpoint—from their real value as grapes to make money from. The Prestpent.—That is what we want to hear. Mr. Perrir.—I have these varieties here, and my idea was to take up one after another and comment a little on some of its peculiarities, or something about it, and if thought advisable, pass them about to any person who would like to see or taste them. Perhaps I had better start on white grapes first. Niagara—you have all seen that. I think it has combined more good points as a market grape than any other grape we culti- vate, in fact, it scarcely hasafailure. Itis very, very hardy and productive, and quality good, so that a person in growing grapes for market could sell the Niagara at two cents a pound and make as much money, I fancy, as any other variety at three, unless it might be the Concord. The next is the Noah, very hardy and productive, not quite as pro- ductive as the Niagara; I think more hardy, very poor flavor. The next is the Lady Washington. It is very productive, somewhat liable to mildew, and poorin flavor. The Duchess, a very nice grape to eat, but does not succeed very well It will make a very high growth and winter-kill; very hardy at the root, fine grape to eat. The Prentiss is too weak in the vine. It will have a very heavy load one year, and perhaps take two years to recover; I would not recommend it. The Rebecca is a very nice grape, but not a practical grape for vineyard cultivation. The PrestpENt.—There is money in it, I suppose. Mr. Perrir.—I don’t think so. Elvira, I think, is a wine grape. It is productive, but very poor in quality. Mr. Beapte.—It wants more heat than we can give it. Mr. Pertir.—The Jessica is a very sweet grape, but I would not recommend it for very extensive cultivation as a market grape. It has a very fine flavor. The Prestpent.—It is more an amateur’s grape. Mr. Perrrr.— Yes. Allan’s Hybrid is a very good grape, but I would not recommend that. Martha, a nice sweet little grape, good in quality, but not productive enough. The Lady, a fine grape for dessert ; early, and I think, when the vines become established, productive. Its earliness and quality are very much in its favor. Prof. Brows.—Do you mean as the vine become established ? Mr. Perrir.—Yes, as the vine becomes established it seems to be stronger and more productive. Pocklington in some places succeeds admirably. In Mr. Woolverton’s grounds, as most of you saw yesterday, it is equal to the Niagara, but in many places it is not much better than many of the other whites that we have referred to; it is too slow in growth. It is almost impossible to get wood enough to bear profitable crop. The Taylor is poor in quality, very rank grower, much like the Clinton Pearl is very much liable to mildew, and poor in quality. Among the reds is Roger 9, one of the finest red grapes we grow, hardy and productive, very fine in quality, keeps well and ships well. Wyoming Red, a very handsome little red grape, early but not good enough 164 in flavor, quite productive. You will see a branch on the other side of the room cut from a four-year old vine ; they have passed their time now and become dark, but it is a very pretty grape. Roger’s 13 is not as good as many of the other red Rogers. Salem you all know ; for vineyard cultivation its greatest fault is being more subject to mildew than some other red Rogers, and in showery weather liable to burst. The AmberI would not recommend. Roger’s 1 rather late in ripening ; in favored localities it it does very well, and is very fine in flavor, and with me is quite free from mildew. Agawam No, 15 is another of the best red Rogers. The Jefferson is rather late in ripen- ing ; a nice grape, but I would not recommend it for vineyard purposes. Mr. Perrit.—lIona, a small sample. Many of these samples aresmall. It ripens late. Dr. BeEapLE.— What do you say of the quality of the Iona when it does ripen ? Mr. Perrit.—Good, but like the Catawba there are only a few favored localities where it will succeed, that is, every year. Roger’s 30, not as good as most red Rogers. Catawba, there are only a few favored localities where it will succeed every year, but where it will it is a profitable crop. Yields well and sells well. Prof. Brown.—A good table grape as well as wine? Mr. Perrit.—Oh, yes, very fine dessert grape. This you all know is a fine little grape—Delaware ; it requires closer pruning and finer cultivation than any other. If properly handled I think it is as profitable as any other grape. The early Victor, good in flavor, not quite early enough, and rather small. Among the blacks is the Oreveling ; its great fault is straggling bunches; hardy. Here is a grape that originated here in Hamilton, supposed to be a very early grape, and a seedling, but judging from the leaf I am strongly inclined to think it is one of the black Rogers that has got astray, and it is too latein ripening. Roger’s 32, much like many of the black Rogers, their character- _ istics are much the same. A very small sample of Roger’s 43 ; it is not as profitable a crop as 4or 44. Miriam isa sort of wine grape, very sour, a great deal of coloring matter in it. Any person who wants to cover any fence or building with a vine can plant nothing nicer ; the foliage is a very fine, golden hue the early part of the season, and it will grow any distance, and is very hardy. The old Isabella ; you all know that its great fault is overloading and taking one year to rest. Dr. BeapLE.—Do you find it a profitable market grape ? Mr. Perrit.—I have, yes, although without it is carefully watched it will over- load, and takes a year to recover. Munro I would not recommend. Roger’s 4, one of the best black Rogers for vineyard cultivation. Worden, a very fine flavored grape, productive and hardy ; should take the place the Concord does in everything but ship- ping ; it is a little too tender. The SEcretaRy.—How much before the Concord with you in ripening? Mr. Pertir.—Five or six days. A MemsBer.—How does it ripen with you compared with Moore’s Early ? Mr. Perrit.—It does not color and bloom quite as early; at the same date it will be as sweet. Mr. Morpen.—I noticed Mr. Beall placed it before Moore’s Early in ripening. Mr. Beatu.—The coloring of Moore’s Early commenced much earlier. Mr. Pertit.—Roger’s 34 is much the same as many of the black Rogers; they are all very high growers, and somewhat liable to mildew. Here is August Giant ; it does not ripen in August. It isa very \large grape, pretty good in quality ; I think would be a poor shipper ; tender. A MemsBer.—lIs that the old Ontario that was shown years ago? Mr. Perrit.—I could not tell you; I don’t think itis. Eumelan, pretty early, good quality. The old Concord, youall knowit. Dracut Amber is in reds what the Champion is in blacks—the first and the poorest. Here is the Champion. Brighton is a fine red grape if taken just when it is ripe; if allowed to hang too long it loses its sprightliness, Dr. BEADLE.— What about its value for market ! Mr. Perrit.—I think Roger’s No. 9 and 55 fill the place better. Diana, an old grape that you all know, and for packing away for winter use retains its sprightly flavor better than any other grape; keeps well. 1605 Mr. Morpen.—What about the Vergennes ? Mr. Perrir.—I have not had much experience of that, but I think it would keep all winter ; it is very tough in the skin. Senasqua I would not recommend. Roger’s 19 is a good black grape. I think I have now mentioned most of those that are worthy of mention, and trust you will excuse my very poor way of introducing this matter; and any of you who would like to see, or taste or take any samples, do so. The Prestpent.—Do you think there is any danger of overstocking the market? What market do you get now for the grape crop! Mr. Perrit.—Well, the markets of the world now have been pretty well overstocked. Montreal is our great outlet, and Toronto ; and there is no question that they have had too many grapes this year rushed in ; with a good peach and plum crop the market has been glutted. The PresipENt.—Have you tried any other markets ? Mr. Perrit.—There have been some shipped to the North-west; but express rates are so high that it injures the business in that way, and it will take too long to get them through by freight. A Memeber.—Did you ever ship any to Buffalo or New York ? Mr. Pertir.—They are lower there than here. Chicago has been much lower than _ here. A Memser.—Do you think grapes are below a paying profit ? Mr. Perrit.—No, I don’t think that grape-growing is overdone any more than any other line of farming. I think perhaps at present prices, this season’s prices even, there is as much money in growing grapes as in any other line of farming. A Memper.—Have you any idea how many grapes are out in Canada ? Mr. Perrit.—I have not. Rey. Mr. Murray.—Could Mr, Pettit suggest half a dozen varieties for good winter keeping ? Mr. Perrit.—Diana, Isabella, Salem, Roger’s 9, I think Vergennes, but then that is not generally cultivated ; the 15 will keep equally well, although you are getting three red Rogers—not much of a variety. The Niagara, if carefully handled, will keep on through January. The great trouble in keeping the Niagara for market is in shipping it; if not carefully handled it is liable to tear loose. Then it discolors, and after it stands a little longer becomes mildewed, and that affects the grape next to it; butif they could be handled carefully and not knocked loose in this way, it will keep a long time. Dr. BeapLte.— What are the keeping qualities of the Clinton ! Mr. Perrit.—I never triedit. I think, though, it would keep well. I have seen them hanging on the branches nearly all winter. @_=>. gPRESERVING GRAPES FOR WINTER. €Mr. MorpEen.—This last question suggests a very important one that it is not too late to discuss for the benefit of the grape interest this year,—How to preserve grapes for the winter. I think there are one or two gentlemen that could give this information. There area great many grapes in the country, and fruit will be scarce in a few weeks. If these can be preserved for a few weeks it will be to our advantage. It is to be regretted that not much has appeared in print of late on the point. The PresipeENTt.—We would like very much to hear from one that has had some experience on this point. Mr. Pettit, I think probably you can give us information on that point. Mr. Perrit.—I may just say that Mr. Cline and myself, and I think some other growers, last year, owing to the prices being dull late in the season, stored away quite a quantity of Niagaras—just put them away in the baskets. I put away ten ton. L00 Those grapes kept in the baskets until along in December, and we found at that time that the market for grapes was over, the demand was so light that you could not sell any quantity. One consignment that I sent to Toronto was in the commission house several weeks, and I wrote to know if they had sold them ; they said they were still on hand, and I asked them to express them back tome; I thought they would be worth the charges back to use at home, but they had been handled pretty rough and were not worth much. Mr. Cline’s experience was far worse than mine in setting them by fora later market ; but if carefully packed and set in a cool place in baskets, the Niagara will keep on until the holidays in very good shape. The year before last they kept in prime condition. Last year, from some cause—I don’t know what—they did not keep as well. Mr. Joun Osporn, (Beamsville).—Quite a number of years ago—in the early days of the Fruit Growers’ Society, I thought I would try an experiment with some Isabellas, and I took a couple of cheese boxes—that was all the extent of my experiment,—a couple of those round cheese boxes,—I put them layer after layer, merely putting some leaves between the layers, and then I dug deep holes in the earth in a dry knoll, and I buried them in the earth. I kept them there until the Fruit Growers’ meeting, which was held in February, in Hamilton, and I took some bunches of them to the Fruit Growers’ Society, and showed them, and they were really in a remarkable state of preservation ; they were pronounced to have been very well kept; they were firm and solid and in a very good state in the month of February ; and that was the way I kept them. I have done nothing in the way of experimenting since. Mr. A. M. Smira#.—Some of you who were in Collingwood last June will remember that I exhibited some specimens of Salem grapes in a very good state of preservation. They were kept by Mr. Kerman. Perhaps he can tell you how he preserved them. Mr. Booker,—Our system of packing grapes and sending to market is not a very good one. Inthe United States, where the grapes are handled by the hundreds of thousands of pounds, they are gathered in boxes or trays in the fields; those trays are then removed to the packing house ; they are then thrown on broad tables and allowed to remain there three or four days until the wood is ripened ; then the grapes are packed in baskets and sent to market. In this way they will keep much longer and carry in better condition. At the same time all unripe grapes, musty grapes, etc., are picked out, and the kinds assorted. Thus they go to market in good condition and make a fine appearance. Now, we in Canada gather them right off the vines and pack them up and send them to market and expect them to keep. It is utterly wrong. Some ten or twelve years agoa gentleman, who had a friend in Scotland, wanted us to try the experiment of sending some grapes there. I took some baskets—twenty-pound baskets —of Isabella and kept them ina dry place for about five days, then packed them up and sent them to Glasgow, and they went in very good condition, and the returns were very satisfactory indeed. We never repeated the experiment; but no doubt Isabella and some other varieties could be shipped—if properly handled ; but picking them right from the field and sending them away, as we do, to Montreal and other places, no wonder we hear of their arriving in bad condition, We must change our system of handling grapes. Mr. KermAn.—Mine is a very old system—one that was practiced before I came to Canada. I take the grapes on a sunny day when they are perfectly dry, and seal the stems, and I have hitherto put them down ina candy box, but if I was to put them in a large quantity I would put them in ten-gallon kegs. Dip the ends in sealing wax ; get some dry sawdust ; put some of the sawdust at the bottom; puta layer of grapes on; cover them with sawdust ; then take the box and shake them till the sawdust has settled in between the grapes, and put a little more on, and then another layer of grapes, and so build it up. Then I take some glue, and glue some strong brown paper right around the box so as to make it perfectly air-tight ; and I hang it up in the cellar and let it remain till I want them. I have tried that for four years. There are some gentlemen here who have seen my grapes in July, and they were equally as good as they were the day I teok them off the vines. But I have only tried the Salem grape in that way. I have 167 tried the Vergennes, and I put them in very small boxes, but they were not well pre- served. I believe if the Vergennes had been put in the same as the others they would nave kept equally long. When you take your grapes out of the sawdust you can take a little woollen wisp, or anything that you have to clean your piano with, and just dust them off. You cannot do that with the Dianas, although they are a good grape to keep, because when you take them out they will be full of sawdust, and you can’t get it out ; for if you attempt to get the sawdust out you will knock all your grapes off. I have tried the Amber Queen, the Delaware, the Catawba, the Vergennes and the Salem ; but I find there is no grape that is equal to the Vergennes for keeping. They are very fast on the stem; you can take and shake them in July and scarcely shake them off. But as for the Pocklington or the Niagara, I don’t think that they would do on my plan. As Mr. Pettit said, many people put them in baskets and hang them up ; but the reason they don’t keep well is, they don’t hide the cellar key. If they would only lock them up and hold the cellar key they would keep them a good deal longer. Mr. Morpen.—You can hang them in my cellar as much as you wish. Dr. Beapie.— Do you use pine sawdust ? Mr. Krerman.—No sir, I use all hardwood sawdust, if I can get it. The pine sawdust is apt to give them a taste of the pine, and you can’t get the pine sawdust to dry. The finer you can get your sawdust the better. A Memper.—It is more like wood dust that you use—filings ; it is finer than ordinary sawdust ? Mr. Krerman.—Yes. Mr. Orr.—I think our past experience shows that it is no use to try to pack grapes for market purposes, for every family can put down a few baskets for themselves. We think this so important that the Stony Creek Grape Growers’ Club issued 50,000 circu- lars last year,—sent them to all parts of the Province with the baskets of the fruit ; and we have done the same thing this year, and in that circular are recipes for putting down grapes and packing them away for family use. We have sent 50,000 this year, adver- tising at considerable expense for ourselves and the rest of the growers over Ontario. A Memper.—Is the Niagara grape sufficiently hardy north of Hamilton to stand the winter ? The PrestpEnt.—Oh yes ; we have found the Niagara grape hardy all through the west. We grow it at Goderich, and up to the north of that. Along the lake there, any of these varieties are sufficiently hardy. The Niagara is there a high grower and a heavy bearer, as it is here. We never lay them down, although I believe in these colder regions it pays to lay them down. I have made several tests on that from time to time, and my experience is this: You take several vines, lay one vine down, and just opposite it lead the other one up on the trellis, and you will find the one that is laid down, covered over with soil, the best every time. I believe the one that is laid down in winter will bud very much earlier in spring when raised up, and as a result will blossom earlier and ripen its fruit earlier. I think it makes a decided difference. It may not make the same differ- ence in all sections, but [ think in the colder sections you will find it makes a most decided difference. SHIPPING FACILITIES FOR THE TRADE, The PresipEnt.—While speaking of the grape, I agree with one gentleman that made the remark that he had tried a shipment to Scotland. Now from my experience last year I have made up my mind that there is a splendid opening for our grapes in Scotland. If I were introducing the trade in the old country, in Britain, I would begin at Glasgow ; I would work them in through Scotland first. You must educate the people up to eating our grapes. Those British people require education in eating fruit of all kinds. (Hear, hear.) They don’t know how to eat apples yet ; they have only commenced. (Laughter.) It isa very few years ago that they knew what an apple was almost ; they did not know what a good eating apple was; their idea was only for cooking. They are only beginning tVU0 to eat apples, and they are beginning in downright earnest now. I consider that our trade with that country is merely in its infancy ; the trade is going to be something enor- mous in a few years, because they are very fond of good things in that old country. They are some time making up their minds to go into anything; but when they go in they do it in British downright earnest. I believe there is destined to be a good market for our grapes. The question is to be looked into as to the method of shipping ; to see if there is any way at all—through the Government or in any other way—of tying down those officials on the railways and steamship companies, compelling them to handle our pack- ages in better shape, and not to fling and toss them about the way they do. I observed they always seemed to handle any article that has a handle to it—anything in the shape of a basket—much better than they will anything like a square box or a round parcel that has no particular hold to take up with the hand; but those packages of that descrip- tion, they certainly fling them about in any and every shape ; and our grapes that we shipped to the Colonial Exhibition certainly sustained more damage just by the bad handling than any other way. TI am satisfied they can all be shipped, or the most of our varieties can be shipped, thoroughly well to the old country ; they can be shipped in splendid order there if they handle them in a half christian-like way. Another point I was satisfied of over there was this, that only for the wisdom—if it can be called wisdom—of our legislators in framing the Scott Act and practically shutting off the manufacture of wine from the grape, as well as cider from the apple, that a number of manufacturers from that country would be perfectly willing to come to this country and go into the manufacture of wine from our grapes on a large scale. They enquired there regarding our laws particularly. At the Colonial Exhibition we had a number of enquiries on that very question from parties there—manufacturers who got some of our grapes—in fact they were refuse grapes that were unfit for the table that were handed over to them ; and they made some tests with them, and at the same time made some tests with some refuse apples we had. I did not hear at the time we came away—although they promised to give us the test on the grapes—I did not hear what the result of the test on the grapes was. 1 saw some gentlemen at the time, and they said they had great hopes of the test ; they thought they would be able to make a very fine quality of wine. The result from the apples they did give me, and the statement was this, that taking the juice of our apples and adding twenty per cent. of water, they had a better article to make cider out of than the pure juice of their own home-grown apples. So much for the cider and the juice of our apples. I believe the grape-growers ought to pursue this question of a market for our grapes, and it is time to pursue it now. I believe it would pay to follow up that British market, and begin at Glasgow. There was a gentleman at the meeting at Col- lingwood that spoke there about our grapes, and he is a broker in Glasgow, a very res- ponsible man, I think, from all I have seen or known of him for the last two years, and he would like to handle our grapes to a small extent. Of course it is a trade that must be handled carefully, because people must acquire that taste for our grapes first. Those who do eat grapes there are accustomed only to hot-house grapes or the poor white Spanish grape, which is a very poor affair compared with many of our varieties; and I think there will be no difficulty in introducing our grapes if gone about in the right way and gone about carefully. I think it is going to be one of the most important markets that we can ship to. . Mr. Orr.—What can the Spanish grape be laid down there for ? The PresipEnt.—They sell them for about tenpence a pound—sixpence to tenpence a pound. They come there sometimes damaged greatly. Well, you know, we could lay our grapes in there much lower than that. A. H. Pertit.—I think you will find no one in this room who will undertake the shipment of Niagara grapes to the old country ; but I think the suggestion you threw out. last night could be acted*upon, in reference to transportation. It is very difficult for shippers to deal with those large transportation companies, and if the case were properly handled there would be any quantity of grapes sent forward this year ; and it is not too late to do it yet. Now I would suggest that the only body in this country who can successfully do it should do it—the representatives of the fruit-growers of Ontario ; and 169 SS TS I would move that the President, Vice-President, Mr. Dempsey and the Secretary be a committee to correspond and confer with the steamship companies, or take such steps as | may be necessary, in referrence to getting facilities for the shipment of our grapes to the old country. Shipments that have baen tried by our shippers are very discouraging, and as long as they turn out discouragingly the shippers of this country must be content to take a large discount on their apples. It is simply that they are cooked on board ship— placed in hot storage, or something of that kind. I think the matter of the fruit trade of this country has got now to be of such importance that if ever we are to get accom- modaton from the steamship companies it ought to be now. Mr. Morven seconded the motion, authorizing the committee to speak for the whole of the fruit-growers of Ontario, which was put and carried unanimously. The Prestpent.—For my own part I will have no objection at all. In fact for some years past I have had a good deal of such business with these companies, and I now take what some people might call a fiendish delight in pitching into them. (Laughter.) They require it ; they certainly do. They speak well to us; they receive us very nicely indeed, and they promise everything that can be promised from any one ; but my experience has been that there has been very little good done by it so far. However, we can make another trial, and the only thing is to keep continually at them ; and I have found a good way of working, it is this,—to go to one steamship company and say, ‘‘ Now, we are going to try you, but we are going to try these other companies, too”; and when we go to a Canadian company and say, ‘‘ Weare going to try you, but we don’t like the way you handle goods ; we are compelled now to ship by New York, and we are going to try that and let you loose altogether.” This gets them down on their knees, I find, and they want to hold the trade, and they promise then; and I believe they handle a good deal better when we pit the one against the other. There is becoming now a very strong competition for our freight trade ; the American lines are bidding very strongly against the Canadian lines ; and I think there is more chance of getting some- thing from them in that way than we have had for years past. * Dr. Beapie.—I was going to ask in what order those Spanish grapes usually arrive ; they are packed in cork saw-dust ! The PresipEntT.—Yes ; you would open up a little cask, and the grapes would be quite decayed and broken up. There was a good deal of loss one way or the other in every package opened. Mr, Osporn.—How were the goods packed that were sent to the Exhibition ? The Presipent.—In several ways ; two or three bunches in a berry box, and those boxes contained in a case with some paper in them. I don’t think we had any in saw- dust ; had we, Mr. Dempsey ? Mr. Dempsry.—No. Mr. OsBorn.—How would you recommend packing for shipment ? The Prestpent.—That is something that has to be experimented upon. I would hardly give an opinion on it yet. We should try the saw-dust; but I believe in trying the saw-dust our grapes would have to be cut and kept for some time until the wood and the stems thoroughly ripened and dried up, and then we should see that nothing was packed there but perfect berries. ; Mr. Oszporn.—Something has been said about educating the British taste to the eating of grapes. It is quite correct that their taste is not educated yet as to the eating of apples. I have letters from dealers, and the only thing they ask for is red apples. They say, ‘‘nice showy red apples,”—that is all the length of their education ; they don’t ask for our fine varieties. Mr. Kerman.—You should take into consideration not only packing but unpacking again. You will find there will. be more grapes broken in the unpacking than in the transport, unless they are packed in such form that you could take them out without having to break them off the stem. Mr. Orr.—Last year Mr. Smith, emigration agent in Hamilton, got three baskets of Niagaras from me. They were packed in ten-pound packages, with tissue paper. One each was sent to emigration agents in England, Ireland and Scotland, and he got reports from them that they all arrived there in first-rate condition. 170 Mr. Drempsey.—I had in my charge a few baskets of grapes when I went across that were packed in baskets, probably fifteen pounds to the basket. Every one of those baskets arrived in perfect order. They arrived just as nice as some of your grapes I saw when [ arrived in Toronto. With respect to your Spanish grapes, I saw in Glasgow sold some hundreds of barrels of them, and they were sold for less than our apples were bringing ; they were sold at auction. I fancy that those Spanish grapes can be laid down in England for less money than our grapes; but our grapes, to my taste, are much superior to those. Then there seems to be no difficulty in shipping them any distance, that is, the Spanish grapes; you are all aware what they are and how they will stand shipment. I think some of them, as I saw them there, could be almost counted as safe to walk over and not crush them. (Laughter.) They were very fim and solid—almost unfit to eat. I bought them in London one day ; I bought a bunch, particularly I remember, for threepence, that weighed a pound and a half; so that they are sold from some fruit stands in London very cheap indeed. They were not these white grapes such as we see generally of the Spanish grapes, but they were a pink color, much superior to the white. I have seen there some of those grapes peddled or hawked—they call it there—around the streets by boys, in baskets. I have seen them sold for threepence a bunch, fourpence a bunch, and so on. Those bunches all go over a pound, or fully a pound. I am a little suspicious about our grape shipments ever being satisfactory, to England ; notwithstand- ing, I am satisfied that we can lay them down in Glasgow nearly as perfect, if we can obtain cold storage, as we convey them here; but we must have a basket with a handle to it. They will always pick them up with a handle; but if they are in a box, I don’t care what you mark on the box, or if you stand right by and say, ‘There is precious fruit there I don’t want destroyed,” they are just as sure to drop it upside down when they set it down after carrying it on board ship, or off ship, or anywhere else—just as sure to drop it upside down as they have it in their hand. That seems to be their nature. (Laughter.) I don’t know where they get it from. Mr. Morpen.—The question I wished to start was this, is there not some method of keeping grapes till Christmas without the sawdust. It seems to me it can be done after weather-curing for some days, that they might be packed, perhaps, in leaves—in dry, autumn leaves, surrounded with paper—or in a paper bag, and perhaps that paper bag within a basket, and the basket hung in a cool, airy place, and when cold in the fruit house a little stove could be used ; and those grapes, put upon our own Christmas market, would prove profitable. It seems to me that this is a little problem that could be solved, and that the grapes could be preserved from now until Christmas, cheaply, without the use of sawdust. I have seen a neighbour of mine shipping grapes at Christmas. I am not aware of his methods, but I think he did not adopt the sawdust plan. I predict we will see a good deal of fruit shipping at Christmas within a few years. I think it can be done, but I have no experience. A Memper.—Can you find a market ? Mr. Morpen.—I should say so. The PresipENT.—As we have only a few minutes to spare we must close the discus- sion. The Secretary has a couple of questions here and will read them. THE PEACH-BORER. Q.—When is the best time to hunt the peach-borer, and how many times a year? How old is the tree before the borer ceases to molest it? Also, is it injurious to a peach orchard to plough it the latter part of this month (September) or the first of next ? The Presiprent.—I think the Secretary can answer that. The Secretary.—I can give my own practice with regard to this peach-borer. The worm develops into a moth during the summer months, in June, July, and August ; and, in order to prevent his escape and his doing mischief to other trees, it is necessary that he shouldb e destroyed early in the season ; and, therefore, I usually go over my peach trees in May or early in June to take them out and destroy them, and then I have them my 171 mn banked up—a bank of earth up a little above the collar of the tree, because the moth deposits its eggs just at the neck there, as it were, between the trunk and the root, and the borer works down into the root; and, by a little mound of fine earth around the tree, I find the work of this enemy is quite avoided, and the tree is protected against this borer. I never found a tree old enough yet to withstand his attacks, As to the culti- vation of the peach orchard, I think it is not best to cultivate too late in the season, because it is best to get maturity of growth before the winter season ; but, perhaps, after the growth of the season is completed, and the leaves have fallen, it would be safe enough. WINTER INJURY TO RED RASPBERRIES. Q.—Can any gentleman explain the injury to red and hybrid raspberries last winter, although peaches, quinces, grapes, and blackberries came through safely 4 Mr. Hinporn.—I don’t think I can answer that question. I think that was asked by Mr. Morden. He was talking to me yesterday about it, and it is a mystery to me; I don’t understand it. I would like to hear some one speak on the question who does understand it. In my experience, I found that where they were’ killed as he spoke of that they are killed by winter-killing, and I have never found the Shaffers to be injured where the Cuthbert would stand. Mr. MorpEen.—This injury to the red raspberries extended through the United States to some extent, and extended through this country to some extent. It probably was more special where there was a mistake in the pruning, that is, where they were clipped off at this season and there was a later growth; but, even admitting that, it is rather strange, it was exceptional. I never lost points before, nor have I known it; but during the past winter the Cuthberts were badly injured. I think it very remarkable that the blackberry should go through unharmed to the very tip—a thing they very seldom do, even with us—and that the red raspberry should perish almost by wholesale. Mine perished altogether almost, so that I ploughed them up. Where such was the case the old wood was trimmed out, and they were fall pruned. IL think we can avoid that by not being over eager. Leave the pruning over till the spring ; that is what I shall do this year. A MemsBer.—Were the plants scarred down to the ground, or was it the tips? Mr. Morpen.—All the way down; everything ; some with the tips, however, and some clear to the ground—a thing unknown, almost, even where the roots were entirely destroyed: and they suffered the most where the snow banks failed to lodge. I found that on the west side of the patch where there were snow banks, they came through safely. A Memser.—I would sometimes find that raspberry canes were injured in a mild winter by the sudden changes in the weather from hot to cold, and would generally notice that on the side of the branch towards the sun they would be injured the most. The north side of a raspberry cane might be quite green, while the side exposed to the sun would be killed entirely. Mr. Morpen.—I suspect that this was done in April. REPORT OF THE FRUIT COMMITTEE The Prestpent.—There is a report from the Fruit Committee ; and I think, as there would be no time to hear it,—it is a description of the fruits on the table,—will the meet- ing consider the report as read 4 The report of the committee is as follows : Mr. Allen Moyer, Jordan, exhibits a seedling grape of good quality, although past ics time of ripening ; also a seedling peach of fine appearance and quality, good. Mr. Dennis Vanduzer exhibits the Centennial peach, Orange quince, and Beurre Olairgeau pear, all fine specimens. 172 Mr. J. H. Biggar, of Winona, some fine specimens of Niagara grapes. B. R. Nelles exhibits six varieties of grapes ; very fine. A. H. Pettit, several varieties of apples, pears and grapes. Mr. J. Armstrong, some fine samples of Northern Spy, Holland Pippin, Roxbury Russet, and R. I. Greening. Mr. E. J. Woolverton, Goodale, Keiffer, Pres’t Druard, Belle De Beaufort, Vicar Beurre Clairgeau, and Duchesse D’Angouleme pears, all very good specimens ; also Diana Rogers 44, 15 and 4, Ann Arbor, Delaware, Moore’s Early, Worden, Perkins, Pock- lington and Brighton. Mr. P. E. Bucke, of Ottawa, exhibits three bunches of a new grape, the Northern Light, originating in the Ottawa Valley, of fair quality. Mr. Linus Woolverton exhibits quite a number of seedling apples, No, 1 to No. 9, of beautiful appearance, and some of good quality ; also some fine samples of his seedling, the Princess Louise or Woolverton apple. | Mr. P. C. Dempsey, of Albury, shows some fine pears, grown by him from imported stock ; one variety to all appearance resembling the Bartlett, yet later in ripening and of excellent quality, will no doubt create some excitement among fruit growers in the near future. Dr. Millward exhibits Winter Nelis and another pear without name. Mr. 1. F. Calder shows Flemish Beauty, Duchesse D’ Angouleme, Sheldon, Kingsessing and Bartlett Pears; also Alsopus Spitzenberg, R. I. Greening, Seek, Talman Sweet, Snow, and Gloria Mundi apples, all fine specimens. Mr. W. D. Kitchen exhibits one branch of a Niagara vine, with one hundred fine bunches, an immense crop. Mr. S. A. Nelle’ exhibits a small branch, upon which were twenty-eight nice speci- mens of Lady apple. Mr. D. Kerman, some canned plums, very beautiful in appearance ; also some good specimens of Catawba, Woodruff Red, and Delaware grapes and Sheldon pears. Messrs. Smith and Kerman exhibit Smith’s extra late and Centennial peach ; also the Princess Louise or Woolverton apple, very fine specimens. Mr. F. G. H. Pattison exhibits four varieties of apples, fine samples. Mr. Thomas Beall, of Lindsay, three varieties of grapes, Niagara, Burnet, and Agawam, very fine, and also Catawba grapes and Grimes Golden apple, grown by D. Lack, of Lindsay. Mr. M. Pettit, of Winona, exhibits sixty-six varieties of grapes, some of superior excellence, all grown on his experimental grounds, a full report of which may be found in the proceedings. Mr. J. R. Pettit exhibits Concord and Rogers 15, very good samples, Mr. A. G. Muir shows Brighton and Niagara, fine specimens. Mr. ©. S. Nelles, some beautiful bunches of Niagara grapes. Professor Brown, of the Agricultural College, Guelph, shows some forty odd varieties of grapes grown upon the experimental grounds, which attracted much attention, and many varieties were of excellent quality. Mr. John D. Roberts, of Cobourg, shows a fine collection of foreign varieties of apples, grown at Cobourg from imported stock. Among them are fine samples of the following varieties, viz., Lord Suffield, Cellini, Cox’s Pomona, Cox’s Orange Pippin, Margil, Lady Henniker, Small’s Admirable, Reinette Superfine, Tower of Glammis, Hawthorden New, Bedfordshire Foundling, Worcester Pearmain, Peter Smith and Nonnetil. To sum up, your committee can only repeat again that the specimens placed upon the tables were very numerous indeed, and of very fine qnality throughout ; and to attempt to give a fuller report upon the various exhibits, would require very much more time than your committee were allowed. A. H. Perrit, P. O. Dempsty, +} Fruit Committee, D. Kerman, Grimsby, 28th Sept., 1887. 173 nn ————————— Sa A Memper.—What about the next meeting ? The PresipEnt.—That is left with the Executive Committee, and will be decided on shortly. We can’t tell where the next meeting will be. It will hardly be held in Grimsby so soon after this meeting ; but you may rest assured a meeting will be held in Grimsby before long. We have taken a fancy to the Grimsby Park, and we want to have a mass meeting of the fruit-growers. I think it would be a fine thing to get a mass mesting of the fruit-growers to assemble together at the Park. I think it would be a grand place to discuss all the matters connected with our Association. Again we bid you farewell. We shall long remember you and your attendance here. I am of the opinion that this has been one of the best meetings we have had in the history of our Association. (Applause. ) 174 TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE YEAR 1886-7. l | RECEIPTS. EXPENDITURE. 5 c¢ $ «¢ Balance on hand at last audit......... 740 00 Estate of. DoWe Beadle... ... ss. s-m 729 47 IWEaDOrs (fEOS < o:2 eraieis soles acre a ware sista a ' ares - “1% ned 3 a 7 ce a 7 He pene mpi at mA: i fe TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE 0 Le eocec eee 5 Aigeria tipuliformis ................ 54 Peron COCHTANI .. 0... eee eee eee 57 SEMIN 6 0 vie cota se sin due ve oe 57 PGLIG/ATEUUACED . 6. c0c cece cece ese 17, 33 BEC oie ws aisie co's cece ae cess 17, 33 Amblycorypha retinervis............ 43 - American Association for the Advance- Peabo! SClIeNCe S62... 65... 6s 29 Anabrus purpurascens .............- 64, 70 Annual Address of President ........ 6 ‘¢ Meeting of Entomological So- Ee Ot ONUETIO.:. 6... Fee see ese 2 Annual Meeting of Montreal Branch. 4 Seteport of Council........... 3 “Statement of Secretary-Treas. 4 BUMMER ICOMID co elec sick ase nine n clap eas 32 Aphelinus aspidiotidis .............. 15 Apple-trees, Canker-worm affecting .. 14 re Codling-worm ‘‘ .. 15, 53 me Tent caterpillars affecting 12, 14 202 re 47 Arsenical poisons, Use of............ 15, 53 meenatupus Doble... .... 2.2.6.0 ne es 31, 32 B Bethune, Rev. C. J.S., Articles by, 17,33,48,51 Mermabta orientalis .........-2c.eeeees 68 EN Ke ERs celSa es, oyaye wie ws 68 BEPEMILIIGED (0. 65 tee ase tees tee 46 mawies, G, J., Death of .......... 3, 16, 50 British Columbia, Appointment of Matomologist for............... 10, 51 Bumble-foot in poultry ...........«. 9 Butterflies and Moths, Chapter* on MEMEO SOL teh. os we vs ale cre 72 Butterflies of Malay Peninsula....... . a Ed of North America; Edwards 12, 46, 48 - Rearing from Egg........ 11, 47 “y "White Cabbage .........: 14 2* (EN.) oC Pace. Cabbage, Club-root in ...........06- 8 ‘¢ Root-maggot of............ 14 _ White Butterfly of......... 14 Callimorpha, Species of............. 30 Caloptenus femur-rubrum........... 66, 67 BPLOUUB Sc 5.5 sco was eens oe 65, 67 Calosoma scrutator ............+.-:: 18 Gamnula pellucida, oo. .is 5 cease cue ec 66, 70 Canada thistle, Insects destroying seeds Oars bccleie star sstales hae sConyas ep eee 11 **Canadian Eytomologist”.......... 6 Captures, Remarkable in Ontario .... 21 Carpocapsa pomonella .............. 15 Warr ot Thy rae oie eo ae lies rae aes 14 Catocalarelieta << ..o3 ps5). vie sccegis 22 Caulfield, F. B., Article by ......... 59 Ceuthophilus maculatus..... ....... 63, 69 Chapman, Charles, Death of......... 16 Chionobas, Canadian species of ...... 23 Chionobas gigas, Visit to home of.... 24 Chloroform, Use of in collecting...... 44 Clarkson; ) PF. , Article: bys cc cee yee 7 Claypole, Prof., Articles by......... 19, 45 Clisiocampa Americana ............. 12 Wackrosehes,. Ss... 6.2 sstoakie eae cewey 60, 68 Codline=worths<. os... 5's asi sae een 15, 53 Colias, PuUlodiIce... P< sees atm eee eae 22, 23 Collecting and preserving Insects 19,43,44,45 Colorado potato beetle.............. 31, 52 Conocephalus dissimilis............. 43 = ensiger. 2. .2..°..40, GEge ee exiliseanorus:.. 55.5; 43 “s FODUSEUB «.:<.< arou,5 sent 43 Conotrachelus nenuphar............ 53 Co-relationship of Natural Sciences .. 9 Cossus Centerensis ..........0e000e. 82 Cotton Moth in Canada............. 17, 33 GRIGICGSES: 5s, ois sl oynyere Whore Renee 61 CHOCOTIS ASPATARDs, «<\c.s0 eis ses re Pee 31, 32 Croton bug cacatcee's olseicces cere ciee 68 Curculio of the plum..........ss00.. 53 lv. ‘C—Continued. Pace. Girtanh Gebers: ) 4.5. 0.55. 2 se ee oe 54 Gee EW TLY chars spec 50 wees ere 30, 55 So oS PaR-WOLM .. .. oe «ome «ple gs 56 BORWOTTAS: 20% c1 soveace tees 37, 38, 41 PilectionuofsOmeenrs sce sicher ake eriese 16 Entomological Club of A.A.A.S..... 29 Entomologist for British Columbia... 10, 51 LEGS Sire) 022 oo ii a ep 56 Exper.mental Farms..............-- 7, 31 F TOILE My /GAOE 0) oa CS Ain ee eee chee rane 58 Fletcher, J., Annual Address of Presi- GIGTTIR SES Sos dak CR eu ee 6 ieeber: 0s, “ATHElE DY wc mes. sc 2 46 LENS CH ECELTUNCG ESR eo oe 68 G Gas lime for root maggots........... 14 Gasoline for killing Specimens........ 19, 45 ieades, Gs, Article. by... ..00 i.e ee 21 RESP SOES, lois cia info areas cc 66cm’ 8 62 Grote, A.B: Article by ...........: 72 [TOL Bee ae or 61 Gryjlotalps borealis... 5.22 - 662.62: 61, 69 Coryllus domestieus 6.30.2. 660.2 2 we 61, 69 CGP IGE IROIN aac) vip sei o's haves 61, 69 Hi Hamilton, Dr. J., Articles by........ 38, 41 eremiston Uy ELS hilar we ir 25, 43 Hawk Moths of North America; Grote 50 Peomare Ghysbe... 2.0%... 6 80 HRDIEGEINIB © 9.18 A oN ees 80 Hemileuca tricolor .,............... 80 erent PY 1, Sra Soy oki’ te RR he 13 Hickory, beetles from .............. 38 H—Continued. PaGE. Hymenoptera, Cresson’s Synopsis of . 48 3 Hints on Collecting ... 43 -s Observing Early Stages Gh. cake osofrk soi. of ys aceeenoeme 31 Hyphantria cunea. .. ...: « .dasaena 58 ef GERCOL. 515.0 shee eee 58 - Inaset powder 2 2. ...4.: Sessa cacaueee 14 J Jackson, J, A., Article by ........:- 44 K Katydids.. 20. 0. 0000 2.260 ee 63 L Labia Minor... 2.3.0.7. 40. ne ae 69, 72 Larch Saw-flys ss.) SOU ho. ee 31, 32 Locustidze, Notes on ........2...02. 43, 62 Locusts... 2650085 0227247 eee 65 M Meromyza Americana ...........-- 13 Mimicry in Butterflies and Moths.... 81 Moffat, J. A., Article by ........... 27 Mole Crickets ... 2.221 732 See 61 Monarthrum mali ........... Chile ip N Nematus Erichsonii........... eee 31, 32 es ventricosus *.. .:. 2.4. = see 55 Nemobius fasciatus=::.. .<..6 saeetee 62, 69 as vittatus «oh ic.) .< 5. eee 60, 62, 69 Noxious insects, Remedies for ...... 51 Nuptials of Thalessa ............... 25 O Oak-pruner....4... 55: 3:2 Coes 37, 38 Obituary: is.s: 32/557 so SAE ee 50 Gicanthus niveus.. 22) ¢sh).eeees 60, 62, 69 Cidipoda Carolina... 00... Sai 66 © pheenicoptera ............ 67 3: BOPdigh-. cx Silane sameness 66 ys verruculata® Mic een ee. 66 Orchelimum agile : . 2200. ea 64, 70 O— Continued. Ormerod, Miss, eee Wer) s.r «>< Ormerod, Report on Injurious Insects. Orthoptera, List of Canadian........ i Sketch of ‘“ Oyster-shell bark louse Elected Honorary ah eae we eres 6 0 P Papilio cresphontes ........ ean dines 7S rs Saleen Paris Green, Use of .......... 15, 29, Pea Crop, Failure of, in Prince Ed- MRE ONLGE is Sie ine vee bes te fs « Pear blight beetle................-. Belicinus polycerator ..........-... Phaneroptera curvicauda EES DPE feo a xine vin cd vin oe os Phylloptera oblongifolia Pieris protodice ce PaO ee Be ee i ee Minia,S eles We Y Won eles o°s\ 6 a)p Platyphyllum concavum Plum curculio “ce a. 6 >) 6,0 5 ee) =o) Ve inte 6.0 018 ms, 6) @ 0 €. 6a 90) ¥/0 6 MMMETE TIS soa o's cule x» ¥ gms ss Popular papers on Entomology Potato beetle SO Ka ie ORC OT Sa Ja eA SR ale Psenocerus supernotatus Psila rosze 8 0 Gee xe (es, a) Save apis) ele 's)'S\ 2 se» e\s 6s 6 00 «0 vie 68 R Remedies for Noxious Insects ....... Senne COURGH. 5. ss. tere so oo ot Delegate to Royal Society SBMA Sc Cee eles gee sales Report of Montreal Branch ......... Rhopalocera Malayana.............. Root-maggot of Radishes............ PAGE. 23 25 52, 53 Saperda concolor Se) Haigh sateen aie ce ees eS acc Saunders, Prof. W Sciapteron simulans .............. y Scopelosoma Moffatiana Solenotus Fletcheri ......:.......-. Species, Varieties and Check-lists.... Spectre Insects Taylor, Rev. G. W., Article by ce see cee appointed Provincial Ento- mologist of British Columbia .... Telea polyphemus Tent Caterpillars Pines pellionella \2ce00s orcas Moos ded Thalessa, Nuptials of (POPs BOLETS: 25'S takes Co eae Tragocephala infuscata Tree Crickets Turnip aphis © O.el ew Beis (s ee. 6 00, elev ed Os wf) «a es ae we whe Udeopsylla nigra €).= 6S 0 Bw) © 0,6 66, mew Vaniesia Aniiopa:’. i. 5 its Sees Semen Variation in Butterflies and Moths .. Ww Walking-stick Insects .............. ALPES ca 1 2 a a CU cx tem, Magrot 2a: .5. 4. seme Willow borers Xiphidium fasciatum “cc BalGANS stat stan a Xyleborus dispar “ce pyri © 0 © © ee 018 a) 6 \e S4o re 0, Bip) ele 4. (Sis inl. 9 eke aes Ope ‘ . . “i ' “ * . , rn " ve i Se aTess —s% shen pre Di 7 ' af A 4 aS? i. . art 4 “« ** sy ej he + ~ i . * oe) > es Sakae = = ‘ pat ihe Oh < ij Nira ‘ 3 = re eee ral mae yAS ud Paiees eh per ered int ie Coan 4 = . m i ' ‘ ei ‘ ne = oh ie 62 WIM acne ee ‘ - a { + Fai {- . Ni . i esi a ina? 3 boa J ¥ ‘ y 2 i |) “* F ? iy el fe ‘i , i i 4 re, " I iP \ 5 - AIT a { - \ a's ‘ , gh = Js a , io y 3 ‘7 Pe = p Oe . . . re - ad ~ , ¢ t . q . ; . ; > A et > a. 3 . a Pt i = * *. * ly , F sae ; ¥ . ), aa + - ’ de) 3 ‘ - ‘ 7 ' “> + a =) ~- , ; : my 4) i 5 fot A \ . . hy is , ~ i- . oe . * avy a? ‘ ’ ss 5 oe j = 4 " Py ihe . ; * - ‘ ) 1 1 —- , e j P s . , j Lae an oa ron F at Jaya q ek ld isp ath *! ‘hha EIGHTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Eo COUGICAL: SOUHE bY OF ONTARIO. To the Honourable the Commissioner of Agriculture : Srr,—In accordance with the provisions of our Statute of Incorporation, I beg to submit herewith the Annual Report of the Entomological Society of Ontario for the year 1887. The Report contains a record of the proceedings of our annual meeting for the election of officers and the transaction of the general business of the Society, which was held in the City of Ottawa, on the 26th and 27th of October, 1887 ; it includes also the audited Financial Statement of the Secretary-Treasurer, the Reports of our Council and Montreal branch, the President’s Annual Address, and the various papers read by members at the meeting. I have also the honour to submit herewith several illustrated papers by our members on injurious, beneficial and other insects, which have been specially prepared for the information of the general public, and particularly for the assistance of the farmers and fruit-growers in dealing with their insect friends or foes. Our monthly magazine, the Canadian Entomologist, has been regularly and punct- ually issued during the past vear. Its nineteenth volume is now almost completed. It continues to be received with marked favour by scientific entomologists both in Europe and America, and it includes amongst its contributors and correspondents the most eminent specialists in this department of natural science both in the United States and our own country. It is a matter of thankfulness that during the past year our Province has enjoyed great immunity from serious damages by insects; those that have been particularly troublesome are referred to by our President in his address, or described in the papers that follow. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, W. E. SAUNDERS, Secretary-Treasurer. bo ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY. The annual meeting of the Society was held pursuant to notice at Ottawa, on Wednesday and Thursday, 26th and 27th October, 1887. The meeting was held in Ottawa at the request of several members, in order that an opportunity might be afforded to visit the Central Experimental Farm of the Dominion Government, to examine the valuable collections of insects in the Museum of the Geological and Natural History Survey of Canada, and to inspect the collections of the members resident in Ottawa. Through the kindness of the civic rulers, the meetings were held in the City Hall. A Council meeting was held on Wednesday, at 10 a.m., on the adjournment of which the Museum was visited and the insect collections examined, the magnificent exhibit of Lepidoptera eliciting universal admiration. In the afternoon the Experimental Farm was visited, the Director, Prof. Saunders, kindly placing carriages at the disposal of the Council. A Council meeting was held in his office, after which he escorted the visitors around the farm, and explained the work already accomplished, and the plans for future operations. The house and barns in course of construction were justly admired, and it was evident to all that a great and useful work was being accomplished under the oversight of the director and his’ skilful assistants. In the evening a general meeting of the Society was held in the council chamber of the City Hall, and the annual address was delivered by the President, Mr. James Fletcher. Among the large audience present were, in addition to members of the Entomological Society, many officers and members of the Ottawa Field Naturalists’ Club, of the Ottawa Literary and Scientific Society, of the Geological Museum, of various educational institu- tions, agricultural associations, etc., as well as gardeners and farmers from the surround- ing country. The address was a very instructive and practical one, and was listened to with great attention and interest by all present. It gave a sketch of the growth of the Society, and an outline of the work being done and to be carried on at the Government Experimental Farms. The value of Natural Sciences as a training for the mental faculties and the co-relationship of the different branches was shown. The latter portion consisted of a report on the insect injuries for the year and the broad general principles regulating the application of remedies. On its conclusion a vote of thanks to the President was moved by Rev. O. J. S. Bethune, who described the work being accomplished in England by Miss Ormerod, and illustrated it by an account of her exertions to ward off the attack of the Hessian fly. The vote of thanks was seconded by Prof. Saunders, who confirmed the statements made in the address, and gave accounts of some experiments with solutions of Paris green as a preventive of curculio in plums, and codling moth in apples. A collection of Coleoptera captured in the vicinity of Ottawa, was exhibited by Mr. W. Hague Harrington. It was arranged in eighteen cases and contained about 1,250 species. The meeting for the election of officers, etc., was held at 11 a.m. on Thursday, in a committee room of the City Hall. The President, Mr. James Fletcher, occupied the chair, and the following members. of the Council were among those present :—Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, Port Hope; Mr. J. Alston Moffat, Hamilton; Mr. J. M. Denton, London; and Mr. W. H. Harrington, Ottawa. The minutes of the previous meeting having been printed and circulated amongst the members, their reading was dispensed with, and they were duly confirmed. Mr. W. H. Harrington was requested to act as Secretary in the absence of that officer. Letters were received from Rev. T. W. Fyles, Quebec ; Mr. E. Baynes Reed, London ; Mr. H. H. Lyman, Montreal ; Mr. W. E. Saunders, London; Mr. J. D. Evans, Trenton ;. Capt. Gamble Geddes, Toronto, and others, announcing their regret at being unable to be present. . The Report of the Council was read by Rey. C. J. S. Bethune, and on motion of Mr. Denton, seconded by Mr. Moffat, it was duly adopted. The statement of the Secretary-Treasurer (balance sheet) was received and adopted. The Reports of the Montreal branch, and of the Delegate to the Royal Society of Canada, were received and referred for publication. 4 REPORT OF THE COUNCIL In presenting their Annual Report, the Council feel highly gratified in announcing the continued success that has attended the work of the Society during the past year. The Canadian Entomologist has been published with regularity, and its pages have been filled as usual with valuable papers, contributed by leading entomologists in Canada the United States and Europe. The Annual Report to the Legislature of Ontario was duly issued after some delay, and the Council feel justified in stating that it was in no way inferior to its predecessors in the diversity and character of its articles on practical Entomology. Some valuable additions have been made to the Library by purchase as well as by donation. Among the latter may be especially mentioned the gift of a copy of West- wood’s Oriental Entomology, by Miss Ormerod, of St. Alban’s, England. The Society’s collection of insects, which was sent last year to the Indian and Colonial Exhibition in London, England, has been brought back and restored to the Society’s rooms. The Council regret to state that two of the cases were broken in transit, and a number of specimens of lepidoptera were damaged. They trust, however, that the kindness of members will speedily replace those that are wanting. The audited statement of the finances of the Society is submitted herewith, and shows a credit balance of $83. The Council have very great pleasure in offering their hearty congratulations to their President, Mr. James Fletcher, upon his appointment to the important position of Dominion Entomologist and Botanist to the Central Experimental Farm at Ottawa. They cannot but feel that the Society has been much honoured by the selection of two of its presidents (Prof. Saunders and Mr. Fletcher) for high and important positions in the Dominion Experimental Farms, and they regard it as a welcome recognition of the use- fulness and good work of the Society. Since the last annual meeting, the Council have unanimously elected Miss Eleanor A. Ormerod, Consulting Entomologist to the Royal Agricultural Society of England, an Honorary Member, as a slight mark of the high estimation in which her labours in the field of practical entomology are held both here and elsewhere. They have to deplore the loss they have recently sustained by the lamented death of their colleague, Mr. G. J. Bowles, of Montreal, who was for many years an active and zealous member of the Society, an able and efficient worker, and a valued contributor to the magazine and annual reports. The annual meeting is this year summoned to be held in the City of Ottawa, at the request of several members, in order that an opportunity may be afforded of visiting the Central Experimental Farm, and inspecting the collections of insects at the Geological Museum and in the possession of resident members of the Society. Presented on behalf of the Council. E. BAYNES REED, Secretary-Treasurer. STATEMENT OF THE SECRETARY-TREASURER FOR THE YEAR ENDING OCTOBER 241TH, 1887. Recewpts. Balance from-previous) years Ashet\.e zit endl. die supe aie os 5 bli DOO Members’ fees, sale of Hntomologist, etc.......... 0000 eee ees 144 95 Provincial grant, USGinug co memtemps tient ein cin 6,5 » + \0i8 1,000 00 Collectors’ material—cork, pins, etc...........5-2. eee cee eee 59 74 Interest on Savings Bank accounts. «.: 5 ..2)s65 caawd eal os 028 7 18 $1,312 44 Disbursements. Canadian Entomologist, printing, paper, stationery, etc... tc, SOO Ribrary QeeOwih esr fluke ee Soels* Bais Pama? be + x8 Seite 110 23 Expenses of Report for 1886............... ee 133 10 RENTS gigs fee cas Sel soe fats ate ta AERO tosieles eI meRG, < XS sin ala stchrhe 166 22 aE TEES 7 A i 0 eek ale Gea le GP en cde, Sc 100 00 EG eIT ERS Sete Sansets cSt rah: eas Bian euaieerere phepeomtateore vaca = sly cee 80 00 MeSeASR ENCE Neen telat = Pike ts Ee Gnarls we oad nok PL ree ree ree 25 00 Sundries—postage, telegraph, etc. ...0.. 0... cee eee eee en 22 39 Palunce ty HANG. 25.2. Vas Bee Waratah Seles meee ad Bue 83 73 $1,312 44 We certify that we have examined the above account, with books and vouchers, and found the same to be correct. Balance in hand and in bank, eighty-three dollars and seventy-three cents. H. P. BOCK, eles W. E. SAUNDERS, | besos | London, Ont., October 24th, 1887. MEETING OF THE MONTREAL BRANCH. The fourteenth annual meeting of the Montreal Branch of the Entomological Society of Ontario, was held on May 3lst, 1887, when the following officers were elected for the ensuing year :—President, G. J. Bowles; Vice-President, H. H. Lyman; Secretary- Treasurer, F. B. Caulfield ; Council, W. H. Smith, J. G. Jack, J. F. Hausen and R. C. Holden. The reports of the Council and Secretary-Treasurer were read, and on motion, adopted. iat Bowles showed a box of Lepidoptera collected at Sudbury, by Mr. J. D. Evans, several of which were new to the members. Mr. Lyman read a list of Hymenoptera and Diptera, taken at Hudson’s Bay, by Dr. Robert Bell. Mr. Caulfield read the following report of the Council for the past year :— In presenting their fourteenth annual report, your Oouncil regrets that owing to unfortunate circumstances, it is not so satisfactory as in former years. The Society has sustained, since our last annual meeting, a great loss in the lamented death of Mr. Wm. Shaw, a member who enjoyed the highest esteem of his fellow entomo- logists as a man, and whose talents and energy warranted the expectation of a brilliant career as a naturalist. During the past year, the absence of several of our most active members from the city, has resulted in but little collecting being done. Mr. Caulfield, however, has success- or fully worked out the life history of Physonota wnipuncta, and his papers on this subject. in the Zntomologist are both interesting and important. Only three meetings have been held during the winter, owing to the business engage- ments of some members and the serious illness of the President, who has been confined to the house for nearly a year. The following papers were read at these meetings :— 1. List of Noctuide, not previously recorded, from Montreal.—-G. J. Bowles. 2. Notes on some species of Ips.—F. B. Caulfield. 3. Additions to list of Montreal lepidoptera,—G. J. Bowles. 4, Some further notes on Physonota.—F. B. Caulfield. Your Council would suggest that efforts be made to increase the roll of membership, and urge upon all the need of increased zeal in the pursuit of our favourite science. The whole is respectfully submitted. GEO. JNO. BOWLES, F. BR. CAULFIELD, President. Secretary. Montreal, 3lst May, 1887. REPORT OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO TO THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA. The progress of the Entomological Society has been so uniform and constant during: recent years, that it affords material sufficient for only a very brief report. A great loss has been sustained by the Society in the removal of Prof. Saunders from London to Ottawa, and his consequent inability to longer undertake the onerous duties of President and Editor, which for many years he performed so faithfully and suc- cessfully. In his position of Director of the Experimental Farm he will, however, still be able to pursue his researches, and, with the necessary assistance of a competent ento- mologist, will be able to greatly advance the knowledge of the very important science of Entomology. The publication of the Canadian Entomologist is successfully continued ; volume 18 contains papers from forty-nine contributors, all well-known workers, and many of the articles are of much scientific value. Volume 19 is now being issued under the editor- ship of Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, who edited the first five volumes, and who has been con- tinuously a member of the editing committee, so that he is eminently qualified to take up. _ the work laid down by Prof. Saunders. The Sixteenth Annual Report contained as usual much matter of economic import- ance, and No. 17 is now ready for distribution. The Annual Meeting of the Society was held in the Society’s rooms, London, Ontario, on Wednesday, 20th October, 1886, when there was a very satisfactory atendance of members. The retiring President, Prof. Saunders, delivered a very interesting and instructive address, and several reports and valuable papers were presented. The following resolution was carried unanimously by the meeting :— “That the Society learns with regret that their esteemed friend, Prof. Saunders, has: found it necessary to withdraw from the presidency of their body, and also from the editorship of their organ, The Canadian Entomologist, but recognizing the importance of the work Prof. Saunders has been called to superintend, and the wisdom of the choice. made in him by the Government, it congratulates the Professor upon this recognition ——- ——— of his abilities and zeal in the public service, and respectfully tenders to him a life membership in the Society.” Officers for the current year were elected as follows :— MTORWELOTED of. 5 025 «|. so ave SRR James Fletcher, Ottawa, Ont. PRCE-T restart... 3. bbe on, Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, Port Hope, Ont. secretary-T regsur eis ii\)4, elas s ohaxl sis E. Baynes Reed, London, Ont. ( W. H. Harrington, Ottawa, Ont. 4 | Rev. T. W. Fyles, Quebec, Que. Wowmenl s. aie k Seon en Se { J. Alston Moffatt, Hamilton, Ont. | G. J. Bowles, Montreal, Que. | J. M. Denton, London, Ont. W. HAGUE HARRINGTON, May, 1887. Delegate. THE PRESIDENT’S INAUGURAL ADDRESS. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN,—Through the courtesy of the mayor and corporation of the city we are enabled this evening to make use of this commodious chamber.* The committee room put at our disposal for the other meetings would have been entirely inadequate to accommodate the large audience which I have the great gratification of now seeing before me. ‘This pleasure, too, is considerably heightened, as I notice amongst you many of the class which our Society particularly strives to reach—to wit, farmers and gardeners—men who are daily brought face to face with the foes or friends, of which our members make it their special study to investigate the habits. As there are many here this evening who are not members of the Entomological Society of Ontario, it is fitting that I should state briefly the nature and objects of that Society. Previous to 1863 there was no such society in Canada ; but in that year a few naturalists, living in different parts of the Provinces, met together in Toronto and organized under the name of the Entomological Society of Canada. The membership at first was only sixteen, and this number included all those then known to be interested in insect life in Canada. From this small beginning the Society has steadily increased until its membership now reaches upwards of 500, and includes all the active workers in North America. The work done in the early years of the Society, notwithstanding the fact that the members were widely separated, was such that it soon became manifest that they must have some means of publishing the results of their observations for the benefit of each other and the scientific world in general. Accordingly in August, 1868, appeared the first number of the Canadian Entomologist, a monthly periodical, which from that time forward has been regularly published, and was for some years the only publication on the continent of America devoted solely to this important branch of natural history. It has now nearly completed its nineteenth volume. From the outset a noticeable characteristic of this magazine has been, that its pages have been entirely filled with the records of original work, and during its existence it has been the means of disseminating a vast amount of scientific knowledge, which has been of benefit not only to Canada but to the world at large. This organ of the Society is more particularly the scientific record of work done by the members, although it also contains many illustrated elementary and popular papers for the benefit of beginners. In addition to this, however, and what is an important part of our work, a popular report of some 75 or 100 pages is prepared annually Upon injurious and beneficial insects, and the best measures for farmers and gardeners to adopt with regard to them. This is published every year as part of the report of the Minister of Agriculture and Arts for the Province of Ontario. Seventeen of these have already been issued, and have given to the farming community a large amount of useful information. Our Provincial Government recognizing the good work which was being oe *The President’s address was delivered in the council chamber of the Ottawa City Hall, on the evening of October 26th. done by this Society, incorporated it in 1870, as the Entomological! Society of Ontario, and gave at the same time material aid by allowing an annual grant from the public funds. By this assistance, the usefulness of the Society has been greatly widened, and the officers have become an advisory board to whom reference can be made whenever information concerning injurious insects is sought by farmers or others—an advantage of which the intelligent agriculturists of the Province have not been slow to avail them- selves. Of all the important events affecting agriculture in Canada which have happened during the past year, none can compare for importance with the establishment of the system of Experimental Farms throughout the Dominion, lately organized by the F ederal Government. To no one more than to our members can it be a source of so great pleasure, that the person chosen for the important and responsible position of Director, should have been the present incumbent, Prof. William Saunders, who has been for so many years identified with the prosperity and progress of our Society ; what he has been to us we all know ; what others consider his value to have been, is well shown by Prot. A. R. Grote, one of the best American entomologists and a highly esteemed and regular contributor to the Canadian Entomologist. When spzaking of that journal in the preface to one of his works, he says :— “The treatise of Dr. Harris which has become classical on its subject, did much towards creating a general interest in entomology ; but the publication of the Canadian Entomologist, a journal aided pecuniarily by the Ontario Government, and owing its success chiefly to the unselfish labours of Mr. William Saunders, has assisted the progress of entomology in America probably more than any one other similar undertaking.” This statement is not a bit overdrawn. Prof. Saunders—and I speak of him from an intimate acquaintance extending over a space of many years—is an exceptional man, remarkable not less for the diversity than for the thoroughness of his accomplishments, but above all for his tact and good judgment which have made him an object of respect and have endeared him to all who have had intercourse with him. Now, above all things, Prof. Saunders is an entomologist, and to it chiefly he owes his eminence. We congratulate him upon his appointment and also the Honourable Minister of Agriculture upon the wisdom of the choice he has made. It may not be amiss here to say a few words with regard to the work it is proposed to carry out at these Government experimental stations. In the first place, the system will consist of a Central Experimental Farm at Ottawa and four other branch farms divided as follows: one for Ontario and Quebec, one for the Maritime Provinces, one for British Columbia, and one each for Manitoba and the North-West Territories. The officers at the Central Farm will be, the Director, and an Entomologist and Botanist combined, a Chemist, a Horticulturist and an Agriculturist. At the Central Station there will be a museum for the preservation of objects of interest. These, of course, will include all the different kinds of grain and other crops, and as well, cabinets for entomo- logical and botanical specimens. As most of you are aware, I have been appointed to fill the position of Entomologist and Botanist to the Dominion Experimental Farms. I trust that I may be able to show before long that this selection was not ill advised. At any rate, I can assure you that no efforts will be wanting on my part to render the office one of general utility and a benefit to the farming community. I purpose, as quickly as possible after the building is finished, to place in the museum a collection showing, under each of the principal crops, all the insects by which it is attacked, so that the farmer or gardener who finds any of his crops injured by insects can come to the museum and see for himself, under the head of each plant the injurious insects known to infest it, and at the same time learn the most approved methods of treating them. In addition to the above, there will be a botanical garden on the farm, a plot of about 65 acres having been appropriated for this purpose. Llere native plants of economic value, as our forest trees, will be grown in large numbers for distribution and observation under varying conditions, so as to note their behaviour under different circumstances. Here, also, will be cultivated a large collection of plants of interest to the botanist from ail parts of the world, including, of course, all the native species, of which [ can obtain roots or seeds. It is thus hoped that many of the difficult problems will be cleared up which at present trouble the scientific botanist, who has, perhaps, had.to work at some of the least known or rare species with scanty and imperfect dried material. In this botanical garden and arboretum there isa remarkable diversity of habitat, from open water and an area of sphagnous bog to sandy upland with all the intervening varieties of soil—rock, shady ravine, heavy clay, light loam, sand, ete.—and I feel confident that a large proportion of our Canadian wild plants can be grown and examined at leisure. It will be noticed that the two posts of entomologist and botanist have been united. I consider this was a very wise arrangement, at any rate until the work in connection with these two posts increases so much.as to make the appointment of two officers necessary. One of the most important things the entomologist will have to attend to will be the injuries to plants from insects. It sometimes happens, however, that it is difficult to tell at first the source of an injury to vegetation. The attacks of some of the low forms of vegetable life and of insects being, in their effects, very similar, so much so that instances sometimes occur when even careful observers, unless specially informed, may make mistakes. Again, sometimes injuries due to other causes altogether are attributed to either insects or fungi. During the past summer, there was great con- sternation in the county of Prince Edward on account of a serious failure in the pea crop, the complaint being that no seeds were formed. In this county peas are largely cultivated, on some farms to the exclusion of all other crops, and the seed produced is of such high quality that the best dealers in the United States and in England find it advantageous to procure their seed from this district. Many suggestions were made to account for this failure which was of such importance to a large proportion of the community, and insects and parasitic fungi were at once accused. It seems probable, however, that the excessive drought which prevailed during the whole summer was the sole cause. It is true that mycelium of fungus was found upon the roots in some instances, but this was always where the plant had been killed and was dead at the collar, the fungus only accompanying the decay of the roots and their tubers. These tubers on the roots of the leguminos are very interesting. Through the kindness of Prof. W. G. Farlow, of Harvard University, I have had my attention drawn to an excellent article by A. Tschirch, entitled “ A Con- tribution to the Knowledge of the Root Tubers of the Leguminose.” It is published in the Transactions of the German Botanical Society of 2nd February, 1887. This, for the first time, explains the use of these bodies, the nature of which had for many years been misunderstood. It would appear that all leguminose bear some kind of tubers on their roots. These vary in shape in the different genera ; but they all have the same use, namely, to act as reservoirs where, during the time of active growth, nitrogenous materials are stored up until required to supply the large amount necessary to fill the seeds. These latter then draw off from the tubers the nitrogenous materials, leaving them empty. Now, on the plants in Prince Edward county which I had an opportunity of examining on several farms, through the courtesy of J. M. Platt, Esq., M.P., of Picton, the plants presented the characters of having (7.) a living stem above, (ii.) a vigorous tuber-bearing root, upon which, however, some of the tubers were in a state of decay, and (7i7.) a short piece of dead stem at the surface of the ground effectually separating these two portions. I feel now pretty well assured that this state of affairs was brought about much in the following manner: Just about the time the peas were coming into flower, a period of drought set in which caused the stems to fade and lie over at a time when there was not sufficient foliage to protect them, in this way their bases were exposed to the direct heat of the sun as well as that from the hot, parched earth, and they were thus injured to such an extent that they could no longer act as channels for the interchange of materials from the root to the stem and vice versa. If this be the correct view, the exceptional drought of last year must be assigned as the cause for this shortage, and not any attack which is likely to give trouble in the future. One noticeable feature about the plants examined was the abundance and large size of the root tubers, and this might have been anticipated had their nature at the time been understood. _It points to the fact, however, that although this year the crop in Prince Edward county is small it is from an exceptional cause, and there is every reason to believe that with an ordinary season this district, so justly cele- brated, will still show that it is without an equal in Ontario as a pea-producing county. There are other injuries the nature of which is not apt to be understood. Amongst these I would specially mention the ‘club root” in the cabbage, which is produced by a fungus (Plasmodiophora brassice, Wor.), although by many it is thought that it is caused by the attacks of a small beetle. Another injury caused by a fungus, but which has very much the appearance of an injury by insects is the Plum-leaf Fungus (Septoria cerasina, Pk.) which has the effect of making small holes in the leaves of plum trees as if they had been perforated by shots from a gun. This has been sent to me during the past summer for information as to the “insect” which was supposed to be the depredator. Again, the curious disease called “ bumble-foot,” to which some breeds of poultry are liable, is occasionally supposed to be due to the attacks of insects. It is probable, however, that the large swellings on the feet of chickens so named are really abscesses, due to aggra- vated bruises caused by high perches and a hard floor to the poultry house. These few instances, however, are sufficient to illustrate the advantage of any investigator being familiar with at any rate the first principles of other branches of study besides his own specialty, for he will frequently be applied to for information, and, indeed, will require for his own work knowledge of allied subjects. Perhaps one of the greatest surprises to one who begins to devote a portion of his time to the study of Natural History, is the discovery, which soon forces itself upon him, that instead of there being a large number of different sciences, these are merely several branches, all of which are so intimately related, nay, even dependent upon each other, that they are merely component parts of one great whole. Nor does any one branch very much surpass the others in importance, for each one is necessary to the rest. And the special value of any one study over the others is only in the eyes of those students who devote toit their particular attention. Allare links in one great chain of knowledge, engrossing to the highest degree to all who are happy and lucky enough to feel its charms, and of enormous importance to the world at large. In a consideration of this theme we can begin at any one of the links, and, perhaps, to-day it is more fitting to begin at our own special subject—Entomology. Most nearly related to Entomology is Botany, the branch of science which treats of the vegetable kingdom from which so large a proportion of the insect world derives its sustenance, An intimate knowledge of the different species and families of plants is of great importance to the Entomologist. It frequently occurs that in his studies he requires to breed through all its stages some insect which feeds naturally upon a plant not to be obtained in his neighborhood; with a knowledge of the different orders and classes of plants he is able to make use of a nearly related species, sometimes even of a different, but closely allied genus. There are many instances on record where this has been done; but by fara larger number where, for want of this knowledge, valuable insects have been starved from only having improper food offered them. The economic entomologist is much helped in his investigations by this knowledge. Many of the injurious insects which attack our cultivated crops, especially those of which there are two or three annual broods, subsist during one or more of these on wild plants allied to those cultivated. By a removal of the wild plants many of these pests are naturally kept very much in check, for it must never be lost sight of that the great factor which influences the amount of insect-presence is the amount of food-supply. Then the important offices performed by insects in their relations with plants render them objects of very great interest to the botanist; he recognizes in them nature’s pruners, which remove or prevent a too great exuberance of growth; and they perform such a con- spicuous part in the fervilization of the seeds as to have been designated “the marriage priests of plants,” ushering the young seedling into existence; they also remove it from the face of nature directly its usefulness and beauty are gone, so that its place may be taken by others. The fact that insects and seeds-form the greater part of the food of so many birds, naturally connects the studies of the ornithologist with the two preceding. By the dissection and examination of the stomachs of birds, many useful assistants of the iarmer and fruit grower have regained a good character of which ignerance had robbed them. How many thousand of woodpeckers and owls and hawks, which were nobly doing man’s works for him, have fallen victims to this spirit of ignorance. These remarks will apply equally to several other branches of Zoology. The next step is to the laboratory of the chemist. Here the entomologist finds the materials for alluring and preserving the specimens for his cabinet, or is provided with 10 means to wage war acainst those which increase in such undue numbers as to require to be treated as enemies. ‘fhe botanist, too, must come to the chemist to discover the exact nature of soils and the different fertilizers, as well as the principles contained in the plants which he collects or cultivates, so as to know the comparative values of each species in a family of plants. Chemistry teaches us not only how, by special treatment, virulent poisons may be transformed into nutritious foods, as in the case of arrowroot and other products derived from the Aracez, but also how some species in the same genus may be harmless and others noxious. ‘his we find amongst the Sumachs—where we have the Stag’s-horn Sumach (Rhus typhina), the seed coats of which provide the French Canadian with wholesome vinegar and a refreshing summer beverage, and also its near relative the Poison Ivy (Rhus Toxicodendr on). Conversely, too, the obligations of the chemist are just as great for the exact information as to species, growth and habits of plants which he receives. The close relationship existing between chemistry and mineralogy is manifest, as is that of the latter with geology. “In the last named science the Paleeontologist finds frequently the necessity of a thorough knowledge of the different branches of Zoology and Botany, so that he may correctly identify the fossil remains brought before him, and refer the rocks bearing them to their proper ages. By common consent the students in some of these branches work together with mutual benefit. The botanist delving in the earth in search of roots, or gathering mosses from the woods and swamps, finds many minute insects and shells. The conchologist, wading in the shallow waters or raising up the bark of dead trees when looking for shells, frequently discovers aquatic plants and insects of rarity. The entomologist, peering and prying everywhere to discover the active objects of his quest, is not less useful to the others, and so we find that each branch of science is an aid to the others, and must be developed to the highest degree, not only that as much knowledge as possible may be accumulated in its own domain, but also from the collateral value it may be to other sciences. But I need not remind you the value and interest in the natural sciences is not for its devotees alone. It is not too much to say that the almost phenomenal strides which have been made in the progress of the world during the past century are due entirely to the developments of scientific knowledge. I will, however, refer briefly to one special line of progress in which this kind of study has been found of great use. Educationalists in all parts of the world attest the value of the Natural Sciences as a part of the practical education of youth ; and the fact that they enter so largely into the curriculum of our Ontario schools does much towards showing the high state of excellence of the methods here adopted towards preparing our young men and women for fighting the battle of life. These studies, it must be remembered, —used educationally—are essentially not ends, but means; means for producing in the mind exact and careful methods of thought, of developing the faculties of accurate observation, and above all things are important as giving a power to express in a concise and definite manner what it is wished to relate. If these characters be not found in the Naturalist much of his work is but play, and his labour is lost ; his studies are useless to himself and of little value to anyone else. I cannot help thinking that the scientific outlook in Canada is far brighter at the present time than it has ever been before. The facilities of communication and travel which now exist put us at an enormous advantage over our predecessors. The result of these increased facilities has been, as a matter of course, a great spread of all kinds of knowledge, and entomology is perhaps one of the most benefited. In all directions we hear of a higher appreciation amongst farmers and others of the value of this study. Addresses from specialists concerning insect life are asked for to be delivered at Teachers’ Institutes, before our Normal Schools, at meetings of Farmers’ Institutes and similar associations. Quite recently the Legislature of British Columbia has seen the advisability of appointing a Provincial Entomologist, and it is with pleasure that we learn the appointment has been given to one of our members, the Rev. G. W. Taylor, an excellent Naturalist and one who cannot but do good. Lectures explaining and popularizing Entomology are found to be always acceptable before Natural History Societies in all purts of the country, and in The Educational Review, a monthly magazine 11 published in St. John, N.B., a most excellent series of illustrated popular articles is appearing from the pen of Principal A. H. McKay, of Pictou, N.S. These are in the shape of addresses to an imaginary class at “‘ Ferndale School,” and from their simplicity and accuracy will certainly be intelligible to all and give much instruction. From this it will be seen that anyone now-a-days who wishes to obtain knowledge ‘concerning injurious and beneficial insects can do so with very little trouble. The ease with which parcels of specimens and books may now be sent by mai! and the low rates of postage, as well as the extensive development of systems of railways in all the Provinces of the Dominion, by which it is now possible to communicate in a few days with many localities previously inaccessible, bring it within the power of all to obtain almost any desired information. It is my duty, however, to remind you that these advantages also bring with them their responsibilities, and I take the liberty, therefore, of suggesting certain lines of study in which I believe more work should be done by our members. Our monthly magazine still maintains its character as a high-class scientific magazine, and should be, as it doubtless is by most, carefully read by all our members. I should, however, be glad to see some new names amongst the contributors. There are also certain orders of insects which receive little attention at our hands, and the work, although good, is being done by too small a number of workers. Amongst the lines of ‘investigation which demand our attention, I would menticn, first of all, the clearing up of the missing links in the life-histories of our common and conspicuous injurious and beneficial insects. There is a great deal yet to be done with regard to the common injurious insects, as cut-worms and wire-worms, etc. Again the advantages of easy access to the North-West Territories and British Columbia by means of the Canadian Pacific Railway must not be neglected. By the completion of this great highway, con- necting the Pacific with the Atlantic it is now possible for us to receive eggs of nearly all the unknown species of our diurnal lepidoptera. The ease with which these can be reared from the egg has been explained in the Canadian Entomologist by our highly esteemed contributor, Mr. W. H. Edwards. The keen pleasure to be derived from breeding insects and watching them through all their stages can only be appreciated by those who have tried it. All I can say is that I, for my part, have never derived more true pleasure from any occupation. The excitement of catching the female, the anxiety to know whether she will lay eggs and whether these will hatch, then watching the small larvee through their successive moults till they are full grown, and the final emergence of the perfect insect, all are intensely interesting. Now the large number of Canadian Jepidoptera of which the preparatory stages are unknown, but of which we could with comparative ease obtain eggs, should surely induce some of us to make a great effort to clear up some of these points. Let us, at any rate, try to have a few of them disposed of before the next annual meeting. Another study of enormous importance which might well receive more attention is that of the dipterous and hymenopterous parasites of injurious insects. Mr. Harrington, of our Council, has done good work in this line. The Abbé Provancher, of Quebec, has also in his excellent little magazine, La Naturaliste Canadien, published lately much valuable information concerning both the hymenoptera and the hemiptera. In this connection I would mention a curious discovery made during the past ‘summer. In examining the seeds of the common Canada thistle with a view to finding out the extent of their fertility, [ was surprised to find that in nearly every head most of the seeds had been destroyed by a white dipterous larva, which was generally placed head downwards, only showing a brown disk with two pores on the upperend. It hada peculiar habit of enveloping itself with the pappus of the thistle, which was wrapped tightly round it, as though the larva had twisted itself round and round and drawn the silky pappus with it until a thick wad was formed. This is probably as a protection during the winter, for most of these larvee were mature, and some which I have in breed- ing jars remain quiet in these coverings. I was naturally much interested in this beneficial insect which had suddenly developed in such large numbers ; but my surprise was great when [ found that from upwards of 200 specimens collected, most of them pro- duced « small parasitic hymenopterous fly of a kind unknown to me. We had then the somewhat paradoxical result of an insect parasitic upon another insect being noxious ; but - 12 such it undoubtedly is. From all the thistle-heads mentioned, I only obtained one pair of the flies, the larve of which were destroying the seed of this troublesome weed (they apparently belong to the Trypetacez), all the rest produced the little black parasites. Later in the season, by examining a large number of plants, I secured a few specimens of the larve which appear to be healthy, and these are all wrapped tightly in their coverings of thistle down. There were sometimes as many as three larve in one head of seed, but asarule only one. Through the kindness of my friend, Mr. Harrington, the small parasite has been sent to Mr. W. H. Ashmead for identification.* During the past year several notable collections of insects have been made in un- worked districts of Canada, amongst these I would make special mention of those by Prof. Macoun and Rev. G. W. Taylor, in Vancouver Island; Mr. J. M. Macoun, in Hudson Bay ; Dr. G. M. Dawson, near the Alaskan boundary; Mr. J. D. Evans, at Sudbury, Ontario ; Messrs. J. B. Tyrrell and Dowling, in Manitoba; and Mr. N. H. Cowdry, at Regina and near Fort McLeod. Several publications worthy of a much longer notice than I have now time to give them, have appeared during the past season. First must be mentioned the resumption of publication of Mr. W. H. Edwards’s ‘“‘ Butterflies of North America.” From the Divi- sion of Entomology at Washington, several reports and bulletins have been issued. Prof. Cook, of Michigan, and Prof. Forbes, of Illinois, have both issued timely publi- ° cations of great utility, particularly bearing upon the use of arsenical poisons as the best remedies for the codling worm and plum curculio. Prof. F. M. Webster, of Pudue University, has done good work amongst the insects injurious to wheat crops, and has brought his practical common sense to bear upon some of the troubled questions with good results. From the American Entomological Society, has come Mr. Cresson’s much wanted Classification of the Hymenoptera, a work which will be found of the greatest use to students. Prof. Grote’s ‘“‘ Hawk Moths of North America,” which, although complete in itself, is a part of a series of essays on North America Lepidoptera, will be found a useful work for collectors. It is to be hoped that this talented author will soon issue a further part of his work. Mr. Scudder’s great work on the Butterflies of New England, is announced for next spring. From the well known excellence of this author’s work, it is needless to say that it is anxiously looked for by Lepidopterists. 1 must now pass on to a brief sketch of the most noticeable injuries by insects dur- ing the past season. The crops in Canada, notwithstanding the excessive drought, have not suffered from any very severe attack of insects. The wheat midge continues to levy heavy tribute from the farmers’ wheat wherever this cereal is cultivated, but only amongst the best farmers in the Province of Nova Scotia has it become sufficiently abundant to induce thei to burn the screenings. Throughout Canada, from the Atlantic to the Pacific, the tent caterpillars (Clisiocampa) have been most injuriously abundant. I received, during the month of June, most doleful accounts of their ravages; whole groves were stripped bare, and few trees seemed to come amiss to them. Along our streets here, hardly a tree could be found without its nest of caterpillars. The advocates for the English sparrow received a rude shock in observing their neglect of this large supply of, what they supposed would be, such acceptable food. I must, however, in all fairness to these little usurpers, record that on the 26th May last, I did actually see a little cock sparrow worry to death and afterwards devour with apparent pride and great gusto, a full grown larva of Clisiocampa Americana, which was endeavouring in a great hurry to cross a path unobserved. The wheat crop of the Dominion for the past season has been enormous and of very fine quality. This is chiefly owing to the vast quantities of this staple grain produced in Manitoba and the North-West Territories. Throughout Ontario, however, the excessive drought has prevented the maturing of the seed to a large extent. Complaints of the operations of the wheat midge and Hessian fly have been reported from some localities, and the former of these has made itself too apparent in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The wire worm has done its share of destruction, but on the whole the injury to wheat *Tt has since been named Solenotus Fletcheri by Mr. Ashmead, and is the first representative of the genus as yet discovered in America. 15 has been inconsiderable. Perhaps the insect of most interest is the “ Wheat-stem Mag- got,” the larva of a small fly known to science under the name of Meromyza Americana. This insect has been observed during the past three years, but nowhere in very large numbers, and only a few complaints have been received of its operations ; but, on the other hand, it is found upon enquiry, that it has been seen in a great many localities, and, moreover, it appears to be steadily increasing in numbers. In some localities in the Ottawa district where, however, it must be stated most enquiry has been made, it is re- ported to have been present for years. Dr. Ferguson, M.P. for North Leeds, states that it is always most prevalent in good seasons, and when there is great drought and a small crop the insects do not appear in such large numbers, but when the growth is vigorous and there is a good deal of moisture, they appear almost invariably. As this was an excep- tionally dry year, should this theory be correct, I fear we may, in an ordinarily moist season, anticipate a severe attack from this insect. There are two distinct kinds of injury committed by this insect. The presence of the larva of the second or summer brood is indicated by the top joint of the wheat turning white just about the time the wheat is in blossom. This character is very noticeable and has gained for it the name of * Silver-top ” in some localities. The other kind of attack is that by which the larva destroys the young central shoot of the autumn grown plants of fall wheat. Dr. Ferguson states that the usual course amongst farmers in his constituency, has been, where they are general, to put the mower in and cut the crop. This. however, is a severe remedy to which it has not often been necessary to have recourse. Mr. D. James, of Thornhill, in the County of York, states that it works particularly in the variety known as ‘‘ Goose spring wheat,” and says, “ It is three or four times worse in my fields this year than last. At a rough estimate about every thirtieth head is affected, and it may prove more than this.” This information is sufficient to show that it is an object requiring special study. The life history of this insect is briefly as follows :—The eggs are laid on fall wheat in the autumn—in September and October, these hatch and pass the winter in the larval state, and in the following spring produce, in June and July, the perfect insects: It is supposed by Prof. F. M. Webster, of Purdue University, Ill., that these lay their eggs in volunteer wheat, and that these again produce the injurious brood which attacks the autumn fall wheat. Another supposition is that the perfect insects remain alive until the fall wheat appears above ground. This, however, seems hardly likely, and if Mr. Webster’s theory be not correct, it is probable that the gap is bridged over by the exist- ence of a brood in some of the wild grasses. Timothy hay has for the last few years suffered severely from a similar injury, by which the top shoot is also destroyed, and the records of the two attacks are much mixed up. I have failed in my efforts to breed this insect to maturity. I am, however, at present of the opinion that it is not the Meromyza. The remedies which suggest them- selves for Meromyza at the present stage of the investigation are late sowing of fall wheat and clean cultivation, by which all volunteer wheat is destroyed. _ From the similarity of the attack by the autumn brood to that of the Hessian fly, I feel confident that the two are sometimes confounded by farmers. The larve and pupa cases of the two are, however, very different in appearance. The Hessian fly, I am thankful to say, is not very injurious in Canada at the present time; but in parts of Illinois it has lately committed great depredations. The outbreak of this pest, which occurred in England last year, has drawn much attention to entomology in that conser- vative country, and the name of one of our honorary members, Miss Eleanor A. Ormerod, is now more than ever a household word amongst the grateful farmers, whom, by her prompt action and safe advice, she has put in a position to protect themselves against this scourge. I am still however of the opinion, notwithstanding the present state of affairs, that the Hessian fly will never become a “first-class pest” in England. As well as Miss Ormerod, Mr. Whitehead continues to write and publish valuable advice to the farmers on injurious insects. It is to be hoped that they may be awakened to see the value of his words and follow the instructions he so plainly gives. The injury to other grains has been small, and with the exception of the as yet | 14 — : ——— ~ unexplained “silver-top” injury to hay, this crop in Ontario has not suffered. The clover seed midge is now by early cutting comparatively well kept in hand by growers. The root crops have been poor for want of rain, turnips suffered severely and late in the season all growth was stopped in some districts by enormous quantities of a grey aphis. When treated in time these were easily destroyed by spraying with kerosene emulsion. Few, however, could be induced to take this trouble so late in the season ; preferring to take their chance they did nothing, and as a consequence lost their crop: of turnips. Carrots last year were badly attacked by the carrot fly (Psila rose), but this year very few complaints were received. Radishes and cabbages were badly attacked by Anthomyian flies, so well known to gardeners as root maggots. I have, however, during the past summer had such success with Prof. Cook’s carbolic acid treatment, that I had no trouble in growing radishes entirely free from attack, right through the summer. This remedy consists of one gallon of water in which two quarts of soft soap have been. dissolved. Into this when boiling hot one pint of crude carbolic acid is put, and after being boiled and stirred for a short time, is put by in bottles. When required for use I put one cupful in a watering can with fifty cupfuls of soft water. This. when stirred up a little is ready for use, and is watered by means of a rose all over the beds, beginning three days after the seed is sown and continuing once a week until the radishes are ready for the table. It can be watered all over the foliage and wiil have no effect, either on the vegetation or in giving any offensive taste to the vegetable. For cabbages the most successful treatment was as follows:—At the time of planting out gas-lime was sprinkled lightly all round each plant. About first July the earth was. wel! hoed up round the stems and another light application was made. This substance was also found very beneficial by Mr. E. Bell, of Archville, in preventing to a large extent the attacks of the onion maggot. In this case it was sown very lightly broadcast over the whole bed—once a fortnight,—from the beginning of the season until the middle of August. Potatoes suffered in some localities from the Colorado potato beetle. This pest, however, is so easily and cheaply kept down with Paris green that it is not necessary to speak of it at greater length. The imported white cabbage butterfly (Pieris Rape), committed serious injury throughout the Province, notwithstanding the fact that myriads of the larve were destroyed by the fungous disease known as flacherie. This disease has been noticed. for the last seven or eight years from the virulence of its attacks upon the larve of this insect ; but this year the caterpillars having appeared in undue numbers, its presence seemed to force itself upon everyone’s notice. Great injury was done by these cater- pillars before the epidemic developed and it was necessary to have recourse to active remedies. Of these, without doubt, insect powder (Pyrethrwm) is the best. This material can be mixed with four or five timesits weight of common flour. With one of the many insect-guns and a very little practice, a large number of plants can be dusted in a short time Treatment with a tea of this poison was not so successful as the dry application, : Orchards have in some districts fared worse than other crops. In the first place the leaf- ing out of the trees was retarded in earlyspring bythe want of rains. The enormous numbers of Clisiocampa and a goodly host of other caterpillars, at one time threatened to entirely strip the foliage from the apple trees. In Nova Scotia the apples were from various causes reduced to one-quarter of the average crop. Two particular insects were most complained of, *‘the canker worm” and the pear-blight beetle Xyleborus dispar, Fab., (Xyleborus pyri). This latter was called, locally, ‘the shot-borer,” from the resemblance of its tunnels to- small shot holes. It has done much injury. Many specimens have been sent to me from. the Annapolis Valley, and by the kind assistance of Mr. T. E. Smith, of the Nova Scotia nursery at Cornwallis, N.S., a close and careful observer, I have been put in possession of much useful knowledge with regard to this insect. Mr. Smith is under the impres- sion that they do attack healthy trees. He writes: ‘One of my neighbours has lost. about forty fine healthy apple trees, mostly Gravensteins and King of Tompkins. They: attack the butt, and in some cases well into the limbs of young and bearing trees a foot. 15 in diameter, mostly on the north side of the trees.” One specimen of apple wood cut from a branch two inches in diameter and apparently in a living condition, produced, as well as the pear-blight beetle, several specimens of Monarthrum mali, another injurious species somewhat resembling the above, but even smaller. A noticeable feature of every specimen of injured wood submitted to me was that the trees from which they were cut were very badly attacked by the “ Oyster-shell bark louse.” Opinions seem to differ as to whether these beetles will attack vigorous, healthy trees. Efforts will be made to induce the Nova Scotia fruit growers to treat their trees for the “Oyster- shell bark louse,” which alone, without the assistance of these borers, are sufficient to rob the trees of much power for bearing fruit. Last spring I was much pleased. at receiving from Mr. A. J. Hill, of New Westminster, B.C., some twigs of apple covered with this bark louse, which, when enclosed in a breeding j jar, produced hundreds of the useful little parasite Aphelinus aspidiotidis. Every scale seemed to be destroyed. After saving a few specimens for the cabinet I turned the others Joose in an infested apple tree, ‘and hope next year to find that they are established here. In our own Province by far the worst enemy the orchardist has had to contend with is the codling worm (Carpocapsa pomonella.) There is now no doubt that the use of arsenical poisons is the only practicable remedy for this pest. I refer to it now fora special reason. In the Canadian Horticulturist for August appeared what I cannot but consider a most injurious. and ill-advised article. In it the writer, who, by the way, does not give his name, writers of such articles seldom do, makes sev eral bare statements w hone giving any proof, warning fruit growers against using arsenic in any form, and draws a vivid pic- ture of the ills which may come from neglecting his advice. This article will be answered in full elsewhere; but I wish a Gay attention to two of his statements, Viz.: “That although the mineral arsenic is insoluble in water it is freely soluble in the § acids resulting from decomposition of vegetable matter —and is then readily taken up by the roots of plants, especially by those of the coarser vegetables, as the potato, etc.” “ Similarly also, in applying solutions of Paris Green to the apple blossom, it is not only that the petals are destroyed, but the poison may be absorbed by the fruit—” Now the injury of this article is this: In the first place the statements are inaccurate and secondly being published where it is, it will be read by a large class of people who will not be able to detect the inaccuracy, and who sooner than run any risk will let their crops be destroyed so as to be on the safe side, and besides this there is no doubt that it is less trouble not to make this application, and we all know how easy it is to take a ready-made excuse for not doing a thing which we know ought to be done; but if there is the slightest doubt about the propriety of an action we seldom even need an excuse to be prepared for us. Now, Entomologists have been for years trying to persuade fruit growers to save their apples and plums by using these arsenical poisons, and Prof. Forbes has shown by most careful experiments, that at least 757% more of a crop can be preserved by their use than by leaving the trees alone. Fruit growers were just ' beginning to be awakened to the value of these remedies when “ CG” (of Durham, Ont.), comes out with his injurious article. In answer to it I say—if care be taken to apply this remedy as directed by Entomologists no danger can result from its use. As to its being absorbed into the potato tubers, “C,” seems to forget that these bodies are not roots, nor are they filled from the roots. They are merely swellings at the ends of under. ground stems, such as are known to botanists as “ winter-buds,” and are reservoirs for the storing up of reserve material chiefly taken in by the foliage for the use of the next year's growth. Even then were it possible for any appreciable amount of the arsenic to get to the roots and be absorbed by them, which I very much doubt, it would be impossible for it to get into the tubers. Prof. Cook, of the Michigan Agricultural College, had some very ‘careful analyses made of plants specially treated with arsenic. Paris green was put on the foliage as strong as possible without killing the plants, and it was also put on the ground where it would be worked to the roots. Both vines and 16 tubers were analysed by a very careful chemist, but not a trace of arsenic could be found. Again, with regard to the injury to apples, the poison should not be applied until after the petals have fallen, and when consequently the ovaries are fertilised and the stigmatic disk is incapable of absorbing anything, much less a caustic solution of arsenic. Here the general broad principles upon which insect remedies are applied was explained and listened to with interest. Before closing the President said,—“ It is with feelings of the deepest regret that I have to refer to a severe loss our Society has sustained since the last meeting in the removal by death of one of its most active and esteemed members, Mr. George J. Bowles, of Montreal. This gentleman was for several years a member of the Council, and was also, at the time of his death, the President of the Montreal Branch, in which he always took a keen interest, and in the foundation of which he took an active part. His quiet, modest manner made him a favourite with all his associates, while his ability as a naturalist was acknowledged by every one who had intercourse with him. He was a regular contributor to the publications of the Society, and also prepared many valuable papers for the Montreal Branch. He paid particular attention to the lepidoptera, of which he had extensive and choice collections both of Canadian and exotic species. Mr. Bowles was a native of Quebec, where he was born in 1837 ; he leaves a wife and three children, for whom, in their bereavement, our deepest sympathy is called forth. Another of our members who has passed away is Mr. Charles Chapman, of London. Mr. Chapman as well as taking an active interest in our Society, was also a patron of art, and has been styled the Father of the Western Ontario Art School. In closing, I wish to draw special attention to the beautiful collection of Coleoptera exhibited by Mr. Harrington this evening, and this collection, I think, will illustrate some of the points upon which I have spoken to-night. The method and care with which they are arranged, and the neatness with which all are named and mounted, point out far better than I can explain the educational value of the study of Entomology. JAMES FLETCHER. ELECTION OF OFFICERS. The election of officers was then proceeded with, and the following gentlemen were duly and unanimously elected :— President—James Fletcher, Ottawa. Vice-President—E. Baynes Reed, London. Secretary-Treasurer—W. E. Saunders, London. Librarian and Curator—E. Baynes Reed, London. Council—W. Hague Harrington, Ottawa; Rey. T. W. Fyles, Quebec; J. Alston Moffat, Hamilton; J. M. Denton, London; Rev. Geo. W. Taylor, Victoria, B.C. Editor Canadian Entomologist—Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, Port Hope. Editing Committee—Prof. W. Saunders, Ottawa ; J, M. Denton, London; Dr. ‘Wn. Brodie, and Capt. Gamble Geddes, Toronto. Auditors—J. M. Denton and E. Baynes Reed, London. Delegate to Royal Society —H. H. Lyman, Montreal. Lig a THE COTTON MOTH IN CANADA. Rey. C.J. 8. Bethune, of Port Hope, read the following paper :— It may seem at first sight somewhat out of place to bring before the Entomological Society of Ontario an insect whose name and food-plant are so essentially Southern as the Cotton Moth—A letia xylina, Say ; A argillacea, Hubn. It is, however, by no means an uncommon insect in this Province and other northern parts of America, and has this year occurred in large numbers at Port Hope. On the 7th and 8th of October I saw in the day-time many specimens of the moth in my garden, darting, when disturbed, from one place of concealment to another—generally the shelter of a fallen leaf. On Sunday, the 9th, a warm, damp evening, they were very abundant, being especially attracted by light ; and the next day I gathered up over 40 specimens underneath an electric street lamp, not far from my house, where they had been emptied out of the globe by the lamp-cleaner. The night before, I had noticed hundreds of moths flying about this lamp, pursued by the usual attendant bats, and waited for below by the expectant toads. Most of these must have been Cotton Moths, as I found only one specimen of any other insect among the more than two score that I gathered up the next day. At the same time, viz., on Oct. 8, 9, and 10, the shore of Lake Ontario, about a mile to the south of where I live, and a little east of Port Hope harbour—was covered with the same moths, evidently washed up hy the waves. Some were alive, some nearly drowned, but the great majority dead. The question that I wish to bring before the Society is, Where did all these Cotton Moths come from? Have they flown up from the South on the wings of the wind, or are they natives of our own country? Were this the only instance of their appearance here, I should answer at once that they must have come to us from the cotton fields of the Southern States, where they are always excessively numerous and destructive. But many of my friends, as wellas myself, have repeatedly found this moth in abundance in Canada. As long ago as 1865 I observed it in great numbers late in September on fallen fruit, and nearly every year since it has been more or less common in the autumn. It has been found here in Ottawa, in Quebec, in various parts of Ontario, high up in the Adirondack mountains in the State of New York, at Racine in Wisconsin, etc., always in the autumn, late in September or in the beginning of October. Professor Riley, Chief of the Entomological Commission of the United States, and the highest authority on the subject in North America, is strongly of opinion that the moth migrates to these northern regions from the cotton States in the South. He con- siders that the insect possesses ample powers of flight for traversing such a distance, and: believes that though it may breed for a season or two in Canada and the Northern States, it does not become a permanent inhabitant, but is really a purely Southern species, On the other hand, many northern Entomologists have agreed with me in thinking that the moth must live in the north as well as in the south, and must therefore feed upon some other plant besides the cotton—some indigenous member of the mallow family (Malvacee). Our reasons for this opinion are (1) That the moth is so common over the whole of the north, from Maine to Wisconsin ; (2) That the specimens we find are per- fectly fresh, with their wings entire, and the scales unrubbed—without, in fact, any indication that would lead one to suppose that they had just arrived from a flight of a thousand miles ; (3) That a specimen -was taken by Dr. Hoy, in Wisconsin, with the fore and hind wings on one side in a deformed and crippled state, evidently showing that it had recently emerged from the chrysalis, and that it could not have flown any distance ; (4) That a female was captured also by Dr. Hoy near his residence at Racine, about the middle of June. The fact that I mentioned at the outset that vast numbers of the moth were this year washed up on the shore of Lake Ontario, seems at first sight to tell against our view and to strengthen that of Prof. Riley. But after all, we have no evidence to show from which direction these moths came, whether they were flying across the lake from the south and fell into the water when near the northern shore, for they could not have _ been floating for any great distance, or whether they were blown at night off the land 2 (EN.) 18 ito the water. Iam myself strongly inclined to the latter opinion, because we so often find at Port Hope large quantities of insects washed up on the lake-shore at different times in the summer, and as far as my observation goes, always on the days following a stiff northerly wind or squall during the preceding night. We have found, for instance, in June, hundreds of specimens of the large green Carab, Calosoma scrutator, (Fig. 1)— usually a very rare beetle indeed—and others of the same genus; these are carnivorous insects, feeding upon caterpillars and other destructive creatures, and are said to especially frequent wheat fields at night. There has been no extraordinary occurrence of these beetles in the State of New York that I have ever heard of, and the prevalent winds, especially at night,. have not led me to suppose that they could have got _, into the lake from any other quarter except from our Fic. own fields. This question about the Cotton Moth has been several times discussed at meetings. of the Entomological Club of the American Association, and so far we have not been able to arrive at any definite conclusion. My object in bringing it before our Society to-day is to try and enlist the services of Canadian entomologists and botanists in settling the question finally. What we want to ascertain is whether the insect breeds in this country, and if so, what its food-plant is. The Cotton-plant (Gossypium herbaceum) belongs to the Mallow family (Malvacee), and therefore we naturally expect the cater- pillar of the Ootton Moth to feed upon one or more plants of this botanical family. There are none, however, indigenous to Canada, but several are common in gardens, such as the Hollyhock, and Hibiscus, and the Mallow weed. We should be very glad if all our botanists, as well as entomologists, would keep a look out upon plants of this family next season, and report at once if they find them infested with caterpillars of any kind. T have no doubt that our President, Mr. Fletcher, will willingly undertake to examine and identify any specimens that may be sent to him, and I shall be glad to do the same, if it is found more convenient to communicate with me. Before closing, it may be interesting to mention that the destructiveness of this insect in the cotton fields of the South is almost beyond belief. Prof. Riley shews in his report, from carefully obtained statistics, that during the fourteen years succeeding the civil war in the United States the average number of bales of cotton produced amounted to 3,449,200 per annum, and that 594,497 bales were lost during the years of worst attacks by this insect ; the value of these bales, at a low average price, was no less a sum than $29,711,000! Of late years the percentage of loss has been much diminished by the use of Paris green and other arsenical poisons, for which the planters have very largely to thank their entomological friends. The loss in 1881, for instance, is computed at 193,482 bales, worth a little less than $9,000,000—a saving of about. twenty millions of dollars per annum. Much of this improvement may undoubtedly be placed to the credit of entomologists, and certainly the country gets back many hundredfold the few thousand dollars spent upon this branch of economic science. Prof. Macoun suggested the basswood tree as a possible food-plant of the larve, because there were not in the district sufficient malvaceous plants to furnish food for such numbers of insects. Mr. Fletcher said that careful search had been made for several years on this tree, as well as on all plants allied to the cotton plant, but no traces of larve had been found. He had hitherto been inclined to believe that the moth bred in Oanada, and that the theory of migration from the cotton States was not tenable, but what he had learned concerning the appearance of these insects this autumn had somewhat changed his views. 19 Mr. W. Hague Harrington stated that the appearance of the moths had been very noticeable at Ottawa at almost the same date as they were observed at Port Hope. The first week of October had been comparatively wet, with calms and light winds varying from east through south to west. Sunday, 9th October, had been a remarkably mild day, and on that evening the moths had swarmed at some electric lights. On the following morning he had observed upon the front of the Ottawa Bank a great number of moths, at least 250 or 300. The building faced the north, being situated opposite the Parliament Square, and had in front of it an electric light. Moths were also seen at several points in the city, but not in any great number. From the fresh, unrubbed condition of all those. seen he then thought that they could not have flown far, and that possibly they might have been bred upon some of the plants on the Government grounds. Since hearing Mr. Bethune’s paper, however, he was more inclined to favour the migration theory. Mr. J. Alston Moffat reported that on Friday night, 7th October, immense swarms had appeared at Hamilton. He was informed by a friend that on that evening they had been around the electric lights literally in millions—the number being so great that he could not attempt to give an idea of them, other than by saying that all the insects previously observed by him were as nothing in comparison. Mr. Moffat visited the section of the city where they had been most numerous, on the following afternoon, and found the ground for a space of several yards around each electric light pole covered with these insects, every inch having at least one moth. Immense numbers had been crushed under foot, but the rest were lively, and darted off in their accustomed manner when disturbed. That night they were very abundant, but Sunday evening was wet and their numbers were lessened. Mr. J. M. Denton said that in London the moths had not been observed, although there was an electric light quite near his house. After the discussion the general opinion of the meeting was that a migration seemed indicated, and it was resolved that endeavours should be made to find out if the moths had been observed at points intermediate between Canada and the Southern States. Mr. Fietcher exhibited some beautiful paintings, kindly loaned by Mr. Scudder, of four species of Thecla, viz., strigosa, acadica, calanus and Edwardsii, and he also showed specimens of several species of these butterflies, and pointed out the pomts of distinction or affinity. It being one o’clock, the meeting adjourned until 2.30 p.m, The afternoon session opened by the reading of a paper contributed by Prof. E. W. Claypole, ‘‘ Suggestions to Teachers on Collecting and Preserving Insects,” followed by two by Capt. Gamble Geddes, on “Several Remarkable Captures during the Summer of 1887 in Ontario,” and “ Notes on the Genus Argynnis whilst Alive in the Imago State.” SUGGESTIONS TO TEACHERS ON COLLECTING AND PRESERVING INSECTS. BY E. W. CLAYPOLE, AKRON, OHIO. & In a short paper which appeared in the Canadian Entomologist in July last, I mentioned my own experience on the value of gasoline for killing insects for the cabinet. The hints then given were not intended to be of service to professional Entomologists, if there are any such persons, or to amateurs possessing abundance of time and means, but to students and to teachers with whom time is short. I pointed out its superiority over chloroform and cyanide of potassium in rapidity of action and in safety, while its use is attended with no injurious effect on the specimens. I now wish to add a few words with especial reference to the preservation of collections after they have been made. Here, too, I desire to make it plain at the outset that these hints are also intended mainly for the hard worked teacher or professor whose attention is probably distracted 20 by being compelled to teach not only Entomology, but also all the Natural Sciences—a load amply sufficient to keep several men busy. For my own part, after many years of alternate collection and loss of Entomological specimens, I almost abandoned the effort in despair after finding some of my cases filled with webs, cocoons and moths of 7%nea pellionella, etc., and most of the specimens either destroyed or badly damaged. The task seemed hopeless without more time and attention than I was able to give. I may say that I had for some years been using gasoline to kill specimens, but here my use of it ended. Knowing, however, and feeling the utter impos- sibility of teaching Entomology without specimens, I began to consider if it was not posgible to devise some fairly easy method of keeping my cases free from these and other pests, so as to bring the labour within reasonable limits. I first reduced their capacity, in order that they and their contents might be as compact as possivle, and also that ‘all the eggs might not be in the same basket.” My cases are now made about twenty inches by twelve, and about one inch and a quarterin depth. Their sides and ends consist of black walnut, well jointed and about one inch thick. The glass top is set in a rabbet with putty, and is consequently quite insect-proof. The back consists of soft pine or tulip wood about three-eighths of an inch in thickness, and is attached to the frame by twelve screws. ‘This back, when covered with a coat of manilla paper, is generally soft enough to take and hold the pins. But in addition I often line the bottom with sheet-cork, or as the cost of this material soon mounts too high, when as many cases are made as even a small cabinet requires, I generally employ instead of it some one of the forms of packing that are used by druggists—either the strawboard with a backing of cork chips, or the corrugated paper made by Thompson & Norris, of Islington, London, and Prince Street, New York. Either of these is very effectual, nearly as good as sheet cork, and merely nominal in price. By setting the glass myself and doing any finishing required for effect, I can obtain these cases at about sixty cents each, and in this way a collection, amply sufficient for all the purposes of teaching, may be set up for a comparatively small outlay. By screwing the back tight up and avoiding opening the cases except in the cold weather, I largely reduce the chances of mischief. All the specimens obtained during a season are placed in a temporary case until the time for assorting arrives. It is, of course, impossible in collecting, and especially in exchanging, to totally exclude parasites. Indeed, it is more than likely that many insects are infested when they are caught. The disinfection of every specimen singly is a very tedious process, and in my own experience proved a very serious barrier to collecting. I therefore now arrange all the specimens in their desired places without regard to their condition in this respect, and then disinfect them wholesale in the following manner: I have a zine tray of rather larger size than the cases, and about two inches deep. This I fill with gasoline and then set the whole case, or at least the back, with its charge of insects in it, and allow it to soak for a few minutes until everything is saturated with the liquid. Two or three minutes are usually quite sufficient. [then remove them, drain off the superfluous gaso- line, and in a few minutes they are dry and ready to be set back and screwed up again. By this simple means I secure the purity not only of the insects, but of the case also, from parasitic life, for nothing living can endure this ordeal. So far as opportunity has offered for observation I believe that the operation is equally fatal to eggs. I need hardly remark that there is no trouble to be apprehended with any order except the Lepidoptera. Even with these I do not hesitate to employ the same method, and find no ill effects from it. Their delicate plumage is not perceptibly injured by free saturation with this very volatile liquid. % Since adopting this plan, I find it only necessary to glance over my cases occasionall during the summer, and if the eye detects any sign of mischief, even the minute dust that indicates the presence of the mite (4. divinatoria or pulsatoria), 1 take out the case, loosen the back screws, and place the whole in the gasoline. In five minutes it is replaced with the certainty that all life is extinct. As I said at the outset, Entomologists with plenty of time will not probably feel much interest in the suggestions here made, but I find, in my own experience, that the 21 plan above recommended has so far reduced the labour of the work and the disappoint- ment incident to it, as to lead me to hope that I shall be able to prepare and keep a col- lection of insects in the future without much more outlay of time and thought than is required for a collection of dried plants. I think if other teachers who, like myself, are short of time and distracted by teaching several subjects, will adopt the same plan, their verdict will be equally favourable. The cases, too, are convenient, and can be handed round a class for inspection with- out risk, while they make a handsome appearance in the museum, and from their neatness and showiness and cheapness, they form a strong inducement to the students to undertake a collection on their own account—no small argument with the practical teacher. Nore.—At the close of a few remarks made by the author on this subject before the Entomological Club of the American Association at its recent meeting in New York, an entomological friend objected that he had found gasoline ineffective to kill many insects, and instanced the Catocalas as an example. By a rather curious coincidence, the last specimen that I captured before leaving for the meeting was one of these, the Red Under- wing (C. ultronia), and the first that I captured on my return was the same. In neither case was there the slightest trouble ; the insect succumbed immediately. I may remark that, in my own experience, I have found the Tigers (Arctias) the most refractory, requir- ing, in some instances, two applications. In most other cases death is almost instan- taneous. So effective and so convenient do I find the gasoline that I have for years abandoned the use of the more cumbrous and dangerous appliances and now carry only an ounce phial of this liquid with me into the field. SOME REMARKABLE CAPTURES IN ONTARIO. By GamBLE GEDDEs, TORONTO. The following paper was read on some remarkable captures during the summer of 1887 in Ontario, by Capt. Gamble Geddes, of Toronto :— Pelecinus Polycerator, Say.—I had the good fortune to take the male of the above species at Eastwood, Ontario, about the 11th of August. I captured one and saw a second a few minutes later, which, however, proved too quick for me, and I missed it with the net. I have never observed that the females of this insect fly very high, but that the the males do, I have no doubt, as the one I caught was very quick and started to fly straight up in the air over my head, whilst I barely: reached it inside the hoop of a long-handled net. The male that I missed capturing, immediately soared aloft and out of sight amongst the high branches of the trees. ' I may say that I have watched by the hour for these rare males where the females are in the habit of congregating in large numbers, and have never seen but the two specimens above referred to, alive. The only other one I have seen was captured by Dr. Brodie, in 1886, at Toronto. If any of your subscribers know anything of the life-history of these insects, the information would be most acceptable to many readers of the Entomologist in Ontario, as I have made several enquiries, as to their habits, with little or no success. There is no doubt that the female is slow in her flight, and that she is handicapped by the long abdo- men that she is obliged to carry with comparatively diminutive wings. It is no wonder that she is not fond of moving about when the wind is blowing, for she is knocked about and quite unable to preserve a straight course from one point to another, whilst the male with his short club-shaped abdomen, has wings equally large, and to all appearance, stronger than the female and can go as he pleases. 22 The female does not appear to be capable of Jong flights, my observations going to prove that when flying from one tree to another at any considerable distance, she will drop into the grass for a rest, about half way, and then after remaining in perfect repose for several minutes, she will clumsily struggle free of the grass and complete the journey. Here, lighting on the leaf of a tree, she moves about selecting a sunny spot, where she sits with her abdomen curled up, enjoying the sunshine and the breeze. Colias Philodice, Godt.—(Fig. 2, male; Fig. 3, female.) At Erlescourt, Davenport, “Ontario, in the early part of September, 1887, I captured a large number of a very dimin- jingee 8 utive form of Col. Philodice male and only two females, one being a small albino variety, corresponding exactly with the commoner large albino. These two small females were laying their eggs upon lucerne (Medicago sativa), and I am curious to know if any of our collectors have made any observations with regard to the effect of this food-plant upon the size of the larve of ©. Philodice. It isa curious fact that in this field of lucerne I should take all these small specimens, whilst about 300 yards from the same spot the common large Philodice was plentiful upon red clover. Catocala Relicta, Walk.—In sugaring for Noctuids, etc., the past season, I have been fortunate in obtaining excellent examples of these lovely creatures, (Fig. 4) varying in the black and white markings of the upper side in a remarkable manner. Whilst some are nearly all black and dark grey, with very little white about them, others are snowy white with very occasional black patches. In single pine grove, not fifty yards in length, I captured as many of these Relictas as I have done in three or four years by trying orchards and woods. The place is very dark and the wind almost entirely excluded by the close growth of the pines, and it may be useful to collectors to observe this in future when sugaring. 23 Papilio Cresphontes, Cram.—There have been several occurences of this butterfly (Fig. 5) in the County of Oxford this year. I should be glad to hear from the members Fie. 5. whether any specimens have been taken during the past summer in other localities in the Dominion of Canada generally, and especially the Provinces of Ontario and Quebec. In the discussion which followed the paper, Mr. Moffat described his own capture of the male of Pelecinus polycerator, and Mr. Fletcher described the unusual abundance at Ottawa of Colias philodice. At an excursion of the Field Naturalist’s Club to Brittania, a few miles from the city, the sandy shore of the Ottawa had been so thickly covered with them for a distance of several hundred yards, that at one stroke of the net he had cap- tured 47, which, strange to say, were all males. Prof. Saunders stated that he had made search near London for the larve of Papilio ' eresphontes, where it had formerly been captured, but without success. Mr. Fletcher exhibited a fine collection of Canadian species of the genus Chionobas, and explained the great value of these insects on account of their rarity hitherto in collec- tions. C. Macounii Edw. was a new species which had been collected by Prof. Macoun, at Nepigon, in 1885, and the Rocky Mountains in 1886. Closely allied to it was C. Gigas Butler, of which until the past summer only three specimens were known in collections. Other beautiful species exhibited and described were C. Californica, C. Chryxus, C. Jutta, C. Varuna and C. Uhleri, of which Prof. Macoun had taken specimens in the Rocky Mountains. A pleasant and valuable paper by the Rev. George W. Taylor, of Victoria, B. C., was read, describing an ascent of Mount Finlayson, B.C., in search of C. Gigas, and the success which had attended the party. 24 VISIT TO THE HOME OF CHIONOBAS GIGAS, BUTLER. . The paper which follows was contributed by Rev. G. W. Taylor, of Victoria, British Columbia. When my friend, Mr. James Fletcher, the Dominion Entomologist, was staying with me in May and J une, 1885, we made an excursion together to Mount Finlayson (an isolated conical mountain, situated at the head of the Saanich Inlet, about ten miles from Victoria), which he ‘thought must be the locality where the original specimens. of Chionobas Gigas were taken by Mr. Crotch, in 1876. Our visit was on June 15th. Mr. Fletcher had been there previously in scarch of this butterfly on April 26th and May 22nd. On none of these occasions, however, did we capture Gigas, but we were well rewarded by taking many other species not previously seen by either of us on Vancouver Island. Amongst them my first specimen of the somewhat abundant (in British Columbia), Parnassius Clodius, which was mentioned by Mr. Crotch as the consort of C’. Gigas at the time of his visit. We concluded we were too early for the latter. Mr. Fletcher left for Eastern Canada the next day, and I could not find an opportunity of again visiting the mountain that year. In 1886 I was at the same place with a couple of friends on June 29th, but though well repaid for our trouble in other ways, we caught not a glimpse of (igas. This year we determined that he should be caught if possible, and at last success favoured us. A picnic was arranged for May 17th. Our party consisted of Prof. Macoun, of Ottawa, and his son ; Mr. J. W. Tolmie (an enthusiatic Entomologist), and about a dozen other ladies and gentlemen. Again no success: we were much too early. We tried again on June 30th (this is a very late season for insects in Vancouver Island), and this time had better luck. Prof. Macoun and Mr. Tolmie were again with me and a party similar to the last. We started from home betimes and were at Goldstream House, the nearest point by road, by eight a.m. There is a tiresome walk of some two miles through the forest to the base of the hill, and then a stiff climb of 1,300 feet to the summit. Our progress was slow on account of the ladies, but we had all accomplished the ascent, and enjoyed our luncheon by 12 o’clock. It was then that the first Gigas was sighted, and after an exciting chase captured by Mr. Tolmie. For several hours the hunt was kept up, and as a result we obtained between us six or seven specimens of our long sought-for butterfly. Only two of these fell into my hands, and one was forthwith sent to Mr. Fletcher that there should be no doubt as to its being genuine Gigas. Prof. Macoun and his son spent several days at Goldstream, and secured several additional specimens, and Mr. Tolmie and I not quite contented with our success paid another visit to the mountain on July 1 The day was much too dull for ie ae to be out in any numbers, but we pees to catch about six more, as well as a few other species of interest. All our specimens were taken on or near the top of the mountain. C. Gigas on the wing looks at first sight very much like a large Argynnis. and [ am pretty confident that we saw one specimen of it on the first visit I made with Mr. Fletcher in June, 1885. That season was at least three weeks earlier than this, and as all our specimens this year were more or less worn I should say that the proper time for Gigas will be about the second week in June, and I think it will be found to occur commonly enough on Mount Finlayson, and possibly also on the many similar hills to be found in other parts of Vancouver Island. The locality is not very easy of access, but it is a most interesting one both entomo- logically and botanically, Here are found no less than 15 out of our 20 native species of ferns, and many other rare plants, as will be seen when Prof. Macoun publishes the results of his season’s work on the Island. Here too, I have met with many interesting insects. Amongst them the following butterflies that have not yet occurred to me in the immediate neighbourhood of Victoria :— Persius (1), Parnassius Clodius, Argynnis Rhodope, Lycena Phileros, Lycena Melissa, Nisoniades and Ludamus Pylades. 25 The capture of Gigas brings the list of Vancouver butterflies to a total of 56 species. Next year if all is well, I shall make an effort to procure eggs so as to observe Gigas in its earlier stages. Caterpillars of all this genus are grass feeders, and should be full fed in ordinary seasons towards the latter end of May. Prof. Macoun, who had accompanied Mr. Taylor, described the manner of flight of this butterfly (Chionobas Gigas), which was swift and ceaseless, as was the case with the specimens of C. Macounii taken at Nepigon; all the specimens taken, it may be added, of both these species, were males. Mr. Fletcher exhibited three specimens of the rare Papilio Nitra, two taken by Prof. Macoun in the Rocky Mountains, the other by Mr. N. H. Cowdry at Regina, N.W. T.; also some interesting species and varieties of Colias, regarding which there was discussion by several of the members. Attention was then called tothe valuable paper by Mr. H. H. Lyman in the October number of the Entomologist, and the beautiful plate accompanying it. A series of the moths brought by different members of the Council was examined in connection with this paper. Mr. J. Alston Moffat exhibited and distributed among the members specimens of two new species of moths which had been captured by him at Hamilton, and which had been described by Prof. Fernald and Prof. Grote respectively as Proteoteras Moffatiana and Scopelosoma Moffatiana. Mr. Fletcher showed specimens of an Halesidota and of its larve, which had been very abundant and destructive upon the Douglas Fir in British Columbia during the past year. He also distributed a collection of Coleoptera sent from Vancouver Island for this purpose by Rev. G. W. Taylor. Mr. W. Hague Harrington read a paper on the “ Nuptials of Thalessa,” describing the emergence and copulation of these the largest of our Hymenoptera. THE NUPTIALS OF THALESSA. W. Hague Harrington, Ottawa, read the following paper :— For several years I have observed with much interest the oviposition of our large and handsome “ long-stings,” but not until this summer have I been able to witness their actions preparatory to this duty. Although the males are frequently numerous when the females are ovipositing, the sexes pay no attention to one another, and this fact led me frequently to wonder at what time mating occurs. Last year I had, in company with Mr. Fletcher, observed the males in strange positions, with the tip of the abdomen applied to the bark, or inserted in a crevice, and had suggested that they were awaiting the emergence of the female. The supposition was, however, not proven, and the actions observed were still a matter of conjecture, and for further observation. On the afternoon of the 7th June last I visited some old maples (Acer saccharinum) for the special purpose of making observations on Oryssus. The trees are in different stages of disease and decay, and are correspondingly infested by such borers as Dicerca divaricata, Tremex columba, Xiphydria albicornis, Oryssus Sayi, etc., while they attract naturally numbers of our larger Pimplide, such as Thalessa, Xorides, Ephialtes and Xylonomus. Upon these trees during their season could generally be found many speci- mens of Thalessa, but I had never seen one emerge from its prison into the warmth and light of its adult existence. Upon a tree which for years had been much bored by Tremez, etc., I, upon the above date, saw several specimens of 7. atrataand T. lunator ovipositing, and at some distance below them a group of males in an evident state of excitement. Three of these had their abdomens inserted more than half way under a flake of bark. Here, I congratulated myself, was an opportunity to ascertain whether 26 a female was about to emerge. With my knife I pried off the piece of bark, and beheld the head of an insect just appearing through the wood. The males had flown away when disturbed, and I was afraid that they might not return before the female emerged, but two came swiftly back and commenced to pay her attentions before much more than her head was visible. As soon as she was out of the burrow she was embraced by one, and copulation apparently followed, but did not last long, as she began to crawl up the trunk, and when I interfered to prevent her getting out of sight, the male flew away. How- ever another was ready to take his place, and the pair were almost instantly a coitu. A few seconds later the female attempted to fiy, and fell to the ground ; the male disen- gaged himself and flew away, and his partner then did the same, starting with a strong and rapid flight. Visiting another tree not many paces distant, I saw a group of more than a dozen males of /wnator in very evident anxiety and excitement, their long antennae quivering, and their whole demeanor evidencing some powerful emotion. I peeled off a piece of bark at the centre of attraction, but found no sign of any insect coming forth. An hour or so later, when returning from my ramble, the group was even larger, and several were probing a crevice within an inch of the space from which I had stripped the bark. Thinking that the female might be here, I cut off another piece of bark, but could find no signs of her, although the males were so excited as even to settle on my hands. Proceeding to the tree from which I had previously seen a female emerge, I saw several males clustered about three inches from where she had come out. Two had the abdomen flexed and the tip inserted in a small aperture in the bark. Stripping off the fragment of bark, I found that a female was there, and had gnawed her passage so nearly through the bark as to have pierced the surface. The males fluttered excitedly around, and, as in the first instance, she was embraced before she was wholly emerged, and copulation was effected as soon as she was out. Being in a hurry, and wishing to pre- serve the specimens, I boxed them, the other males flying around me in great excitement until this was achieved. Two days later I was able to visit the same locality for the purpose of making further observations on these insects. On tree number one I saw at some distance up the trunk asmall cluster of expectant males. By standing on the top of a dilapidated and shaky fence, I was just able to reach the spot and with my knife remove the cover- ingof bark. As my position was too precarious for comfortable observation, I secured the female as she emerged and carried her to another tree upon which were some males. As soon as she commenced to crawl up the trunk, she was eagerly followed.and embraced by one of the more active males. Copulation took place with four different males—the female falling to the ground on each occasion, and being again seized as she crawled up —the last union continuing 24 minutes, after Sao she flew away unattended. On proceeding to tree number two, I found a very large and strongly excited cluster of the males in the immediate vicinity of the spot from which I had cut the bark on the former day. They were about twenty in number, and were packed so closely together that those in the centre could scarcely be seen. Like the inmates of a burning theatre, they trampled over one another in their excitement. Displacing them with some difii- culty, I hewed off a slice of bark and revealed the female cutting her way to a new life, her head being partially visible. Her ardent admirers immediately swarmed around and endeavored to get their abdomens down the burrow, an undertaking in which they im- peded one another so greatly that the only result was wedging the female in and pre- venting her from emerging. The cluster was soon so dense that she was entirely hidden, and as there seemed no prospect of her getting out for some time under the cirenmstances, I began to drive off, or rather forcibly to remove one by one, her besiegers. After nearly all were removed, I saw that one of the few remaining had his abdomen inserted its full length in the burrow. As the female was still unable to emerge, I drove off the re- maining males, and as soon as the way was clear she came rapidly out. There was instantly fierce rivalry for her favors, but eventually one stronger, or more agile, than his fellows, succeeded in his desires, the pair remaining about 1} minutes in coitu, after which the female ceased apparently to have further attractions. The foregoing notes (written upon the second date of observation) show that the 27 males are able to determine where a female is making her way outward—some time, perhaps, as in the last case recorded, many hours before she appears. Whether this is ascertained by the sense of hearing or smell, or a combination of both, I do not attempt to say, but the antenne are evidently largely used in locating her, as may be readily seen by the way in which the bark is examined with them. When there is a crevice or aperture, the male bends his abdomen—at the suture between first and second segments —until it is at right angles to the thorax, and endeavors to insert it in the said crevice or aperture. He has then the attitude of a female insect ovipositing. As has been men- tioned, if the hole is large enough the abdomen will be fully inserted, and it is perhaps possible that copulation may take place while the female is yet in the burrow. On emergence she is immediately seized, the legs of the male clasping the yet unfolded wings with the abdomen, and thus preventing her from flying. From the large number of males always about at this season, it is probable that the female seldom, if ever, emerges unattended. After the very brief honeymoon, she is no longer an attraction to the opposite sex, and is able to proceed unmolested with her work of depositing the germs of afuture generation. I may add that of the pair confined by me the male died the same or following day, while the female was strong and vigorous until she unadvisedly entered a cyanide bottle. SPECIES, VARIETIES, AND CHECK LISTS. A paper on this subject was read by J. Alston Moffatt, of Hamilton, as follows :— That a very considerable diversity of opinion obtains amongst writers “‘ On what con- ‘stitutes a species?” is apparent to all readers of works on biology, and the discussions about species and varieties make it manifest that the question has not yet been settled to the satisfaction of all. Therefore, when one is going to speak on the subject, the first thing he ought to do to prevent misunderstanding, is to give as clearly as possible the view he holds about the terms. ; Mine is, that fertile progeny is an unmistakeable evidence of oneness of species, regardless of external differences, and that within the bounds of species as thus stated, a limit to variations cannot be set. That breeding does, in some manner define species, seems to be acknowledged by all. For whenever it is proved, that diverse forms that were called species have a common parentage, they are by general consent termed varieties. It is not possible in entomology to adopt, in every case, this the natural mode of determining species. The scientific one of determining them by external marks, is the only available one at first, in most cases, but it is necessarily uncertain, for who shall say that there have not been, or may not yet be varieties of it found. So that as knowledge increases, species are always liable to be turned into varieties, Now here comes in a constant source of trouble; it seems that some consider it ‘the proper thing to do, when various forms are proved to have a common parentage, ito wipe out all the names but one. I protest most emphatically as a collector, and in the interest of collectors, against this habit of abolishing names, simply because they cannot be called species. The impression is getting abroad that we have too many species in our lists; that may be perfectly true, -and yet it does not necessarily follow that we have too many names. Mr. Grote, in his instructive article on ‘‘ Representative Species,” says,—“It is a little odd to notice, in this matter of varieties, how anxious some writers are to draw in the species of others,—and how indifferent they are about drawing in their own varieties.” This sentence clearly indicates the unsatisfactory condition this whole subject is in. I see that this process of “drawing in,” is going on in every department of biology. 28 If it is not judiciously done, it is well calculated to inflict grievous injustice on the industrious workers that went before, and a corresponding loss and labour on those that come after. Let us look how it works in practice; take as an illustration of the wrong: done to the students and investigators of the past, and the loss sustained by the collectors of the present, an extreme but well known example, Caberodes confusaria, Hub., a moth that has been redescribed eight times at least, from the fact of its having a large number of distinct varieties. A beginner takes one form, he gets it named Caberodes confusaria, Hub., he turns to his list, marks it off, and, thinks he is done with it ; takes another which he thinks is different, gets the same name for that, and yet another, and so on, it may be through the whole series ; not a shadow of indication, it may be, in his check list to intimate to him that it was a variable insect he had to deal with, and his feeling about it will be one of confusion, if not of disgust. Now, if the proper names of these varieties with the authority had been retained, a glance at his list would have warned him what he was to expect of this insect, and if he had access to the writings of these authors, he could easily have got the names for himself, thus getting the full benefit of the labours of those that went before him, but as it is at present, these are as good as lost to him, and he has to go over the same ground again for himself ; this does not look like advancing science, but a throwing away of advances gained. Synonyms, of course, must go, but where a variety has been named, even if it be but the extreme of intergrades, let it stay ; it is surely far better to run the risk of having too many variety names than attempt to consolidate them all under one by calling it species; but some may say who is to decide which is the species and which the variety. I think Mr. W. H. Edwards has settled that question effectually,—they are all varieties, it takes the whole series to make up the species. Priority may settle precedence. Adopt this principle, and it stops at once, and for all time the contention amongst the authorities whether theirs is the species or the variety. : We have the proof of experience, that no one form stands as the progenitor of all the others, but that each is quite capable of producing any one, or all of the rest. Now look at how this would affect the arrangement of our cabinets. We should have Caberodes confusaria Hub., as the name of the species, not to be attached to any form, but including all, then we should have confusaria var. this, that and the others, as far as we had obtained material. Thus avoiding the use of three names on a label, which we all know is exceedingly inconvenient ; giving us a clear and comprehensive view of a variable insect, and adding greatly to the interest, value, and scientific exactness of our collections. If this principle of dealing with varieties was adopted for all kinds, which Mr. Edwards applies only to seasonal ones, there would have to be a considerable addition made to the names on our lists. Take any species with varieties :— Catocalu relicta, for instance, has three well defined forms, each as truly relicta, as the others, two only have separate names, so we want yet another name to give natural- ness to our view of the species relicta. As to how we lose by our present method, which of us has any definite conception of Drasteria erechtea as a species ; we are all familiar enough with bits of it. I see by Mr. Grote’s list that it has been endowed with nine names in its time, and I doubt not. they could be all occupied to advantage. If I eould have got separate names for my different forms I shculd have collected all I could find, but varieties without names in a collection are a confusion and a nuisance ; yet each one is needed to give a correct view of the species as it exists in nature, but our present method offers no inducement to ' follow it out, as they occupy no permanent place in our literature, whatever they may do in nature; yet it appears to me that the production of varieties, is one of the most intensely interesting operations that is going on in nature’s vast laboratory, and well worthy of our closest observation and study. 29 Rey. C. J. S. Bethune submitted a circular letter from Prof. Alfred Wailly, of England, asking for specimens of any silk moths or their cocoons. . Mr. Fletcher drew attention to an article which bad appeared in the August number of the Canadian Horticulturist, condemning the use of Paris green as an insecticide. He considered that article inaccurate and very injurious, as it might prevent the farmers from making use of this most valuable remedy, and in confirmation of his opinion read a letter from Prof. A. J. Cook describing experiments with Paris green, and proving that no ill effects could result from eating potatoes or fruit upon which it was used in the ordinary manner for the prevention of insect attacks. Mr. Harrington submitted a note on “‘ Further Observations on Oryssus Sayi,” in which attention was also drawn to a clerical error in the paper on that insect in the May number of the Entomologist. A vote of thanks was unanimously ordered to be conveyed to the Mayor and City Council for the use of the council chamber and committee room in the City Hall for the meetings of the Society. The meeting adjourned at 6 p.m,, sine die. ENTOMOLOGICAL CLUB OF THE AMERICAN ASSOOIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. The Club met at New York on Tuesday, August 9th, 1887, at 2.30 p.m. The President, Professor Comstock, of Cornell University, Ithaca, took the chair, and Mr. J. B. Smith, of Washington, D.C., acted as Secretary, in the absence of Mr. E. Baynes Reed, of London, Ont. Meetings were held from time to time during the session of the A. A. A. S. The following persons were present at some or all of the meetings of the Club :—Prof. J. H. Comstock, Ithaca, N.Y. ; J. A. Lintner, Albany, N.Y.; Prof. C. V. Riley, J. B. Smith, Washington, D.C.; E. L. Graef, Rev. G. D. Hulst, Brooklyn, N.Y. ; W. Beutenmiiller, G. W. J. Angell, New York; Mr. and Mrs. E. W. Claypole, Akron, O.; Mr. and Mrs. H. F. Bassett, Waterbury, Conn. ; Prof. A. J. Cook, Agric. College, Mich. ; G. Dimmock, Cambridge, Mass. ; Dr. P. A. Hoy, Racine, Wis. ; J. H. Emerton, Boston, Mass. ; Rev. J.G. Morris, Baltimore, Ind.; A. 8S. Fuller, Ridgewood, N.J.; Mr. and Mrs. E. D. Southwick, F. B. Chittenden, E. C. M. Rand, Dr. Maury and others. The. Entomological Society of Ontario was represented by Prof. W. Saunders, of © Ottawa. The President read his annual address, giving a history of the various systems of classification of insects since the time of Linnzus, and especially dwelling upon the more recent subdivisions of some orders by Brauer and Packard. The address is to be printed in a new introductory work on Entomology. Prof. Riley, commenting upon the address, _ said that the paper was an important one, and he fully realized the difficulties in coming to a final and satisfactory conclusion. For his part he liked the old classifications, based on the trophi and pterostic characters; they had the merit of being well defined and easily limited. He did not believe in the creation of numerous orders, but would rather consider them aberrant groups or sub-orders, if necessary. Classification, however, for some time to come must be a matter of opinion. Many classifications have been proposed since that of Linnzus, have had their day, and have been forgotten. He had the highest respect for Dr. Brauer, but he did not entirely agree with him. He did not think too much stress should be given to the adolescent states, which more than anything were subject to independent changes by their environment. Mr. J. B. Smith said he was glad Prof. Comstock had chosen the subject he did, for he had long wished that the gist of Brauer’s classification could be presented in an acces- sible form to American students, and Prof. Comstock’s paper did that to someextent. He agreed thoroughly with Prof. Riley in his estimate of the value of the adolescent stages. 30 In the Lepidoptera for instance the larve of Alypia, Psychomorpha and Eudryas are scarcely distinguishable, while the imagoes certainly belong to different families. He thought it required considerable courage often, to carry out consistently the idea of giving value to structure, irrespective of number of species or genera. In the Coleoptera only they have consistently based families on structure, whether there was one species or thousands. Under the call of papers, Mr. Smith read from printed proofs a paper on the species. of Callimorpha, prepared for the U. 8. Nat’l Mus. Proc., illustrated by blackboard sketches. He made nine species of the American forms instead three as heretofore recog- nized, and pointed out the differences between them, making the pattern of maculation the criterion of his species. Mr. Graef expressed his dissent from Mr. Smith’s views, and showed how in his opinion the maculation could be so modified as to produce the different forms. Prof. Riley commenting on Mr. Smith’s paper said that he did not agree with him atall. He thought that there was but a single white species and possibly “there may be three rather well marked species, with three ‘moderately well marked larval forms. He said that in variation not only colour changes but sometimes the pattern does also. Es- pecially is this true in forms that have more than a single brood annually. He instanced cases in the Zortricide, where forms appear, so different in pattern that there seems no possible connection between them, but bred from the same hatch of eggs. Mr. Hulst also expressed his dissent from Mr. Smith’s views. He thought that the variability of other species in the Arctiid@ was well established by breeding, and it should be at least considered probable that other species in the same group variedas much. He had taken specimens numerously, and it seemed to him that he had taken forms from the lightest to the darkest under such circumstances as to make it very certain they were one species. > Mr. Smith replied briefly, admitting the possibility that the white forms may be albino forms of dark species, but again emphasizing the differences in pattern as indicative of specific value.* On Wednesday, August 10th, the Club met at 9.20 a.m. The following officers were elected for the ensuing year :— President—Mr. John B. Smith, Washington, D.C. Vice-President— Prof. J. A. Lintner, Albany, N.Y. Secretary—Prof. A. J. Cook, Agricultural College, Mich. Mr. Basset enquired whether anyone could tell him positively how TARY broods of the currant worm there are annually. Prof. Cook said in Michigan there are two; Dr. Morris said two near Baltimore, Md.; Prof. Riley said probably three in the south, but this is uncertain, as the insect is rarely injurious there and attracts less attention ; he believes there are three from information he has received, but there are only two broods in the north where it is injurious. Prof. Comstock said they have two broods at Ithaca, N.Y. Mr. Bassett said that until recently he had believed the same, but last summer a friénd brought him every few days eggs and larvz in all stages throughout the season ; he was very much surprised at this and thought it indicated more than two generations. Prof. Riley replied that this was true ; they did appear in that way, but that was caused merely by the difference in the time required for development, some running through their transformations much more rapidly than others. There are, however, only two well marked broods, which overlap each other or leave only a very short interval between them. * For further discussion of this subject vide Mr. Lyman’s paper in the Can. Entomologist for October, 1887, page 181, and Mr. Smith’s paper C. #., December, 1887, page 235. dl Prof. Cook confirmed this statement. He had, in laboratory experiments, carried over the pupz of the spring brood until the following summer, and in the same way the codling moth has been carried over. In the afternoon the Entomologists and Botanists joined in an excursion by steamer to Sandy Hook, which proved very interesting and agreeable. On Thursday, August 11th, the Club met again. Prof. Saunders, of Ottawa, gave a brief review of what had been done recently in the way of establishing Experiment Stations in Canada, at which Entomology in its rela- tions to Agriculture formed one of the subjects of experiment. Five stations are proposed— a central station at Ottawa, a 2nd in the Maritime Provinces, a 3rd in Manitoba, a 4thin the N. W. Territory and the 5th in British Columbia. At the Central Station an Ento- mologist—Mr. Fletcher—has been appointed, and a collection of insects of all the sections will be formed there. It is intended also that bulletins be issued several times in the course of the year to interest the public in the work and demonstrate its general utility. He had been travelling about a great deal during the past year and had done little Entomological work ; but he bad noticed this spring near Ottawa the larva of Vanzssa antiopa in immense numbers, stripping willows. It is not usually common with them. In Nova Scotia he saw Satyrus alope and nephele in great. numbers, with all sorts of in- tergrades between. He also found the potato beetle there, which appears in this section for the first time. The growers there follow the old fashioned plan of knocking them into a pan with a stick. Dr. Morris stated that Crioceris asparagi had reached them at Baltimore and proved very destructive. Prof. Saunders said it was not yet found in Canada. Prof. Comstock said he had found it as far west as Geneva, N.Y. The insect seems to have started from Long Island. Prof. Cook said that the method of knocking the potato beetles from the plants with a stick, is both old and new, for one of the largest growers of potatoes in his section of the country had returned to it after trying all kinds of poisons. He claimed it was cheaper for him to destroy them in that way, and while Prof. Cook did not understand how this could be possible, yet this farmer claims it is so and follows out his belief. Prof. Saunders said that in the Maritime Provinces, Nova Scotia and New Bruns- wick, he found the larch saw-fly (Wematus erichsonii), extremely abundant and destructive. Mr. E. C. M. Rand, of New York exhibited some specimens of Coleoptera taken from a mummy, and suggested they might be of interest, as perhaps old types. The mummy dated back at least as far as 1200 B.C., and he explained the number of wrappers and method of covering, and stated that channels had been made in the wrappers, and in these some of the bettles were found. Prof. Claypole explained the use of gasoline for collecting purposes. (See his paper : “A Practical note on Collecting Insects.”) He also exhibited an insect case used by him, which he claims to be superior to any equally cheap contrivance. It consists of a box frame into which a glass top is permanently fixed; the bottom is corked, or not, as desired; it is filled with specimens and then screwed to the frame. Prof. Cook said that he had tried gasoline, and found it much less rapid and certain than cyanide properly prepared ; he did not believe in it at all. Mr. J. B. Smith objected to Prof. Claypole’s case that it was too inconvenient to use, as to get at an insect meant unscrewing the bottom and replacing it. A collection so preserved was useless except for the most superficial comparisons. Prof. Comstock explained a contrivance for watching the early stages of Hymenop- tera nesting in stems of plants. He took a number of slender glass tubes, covered them on the outside with dark paper, and hung them on bushes frequented by such bees. He exhibited several of these tubes in which the bees had nested, containing larve in various stages of developement. The whole life history can thus be watched with very little trouble. 32 Mr. J. B. Smith read a paper on “ The Specific characters of the genus Arctia.” (Published in full in ELntom. Amer. vol 3, p. 109.) r+.wLhe date of the first meeting for next year was then discussed, experience having shown that the first meeting of the Club, as now held on the day preceding the general meeting of the Association, was generally poorly attended and the President’s address read to almost empty benches. After some discussion it was resolved to hold the first meeting of the Olub in future at 9 a.m., on the first day of the meeting of the A.A.A.S. On Friday, August 12th, Prof. Riley gave a short account of the discovery of the female of Phengodes. He also spoke on Pronuba, and its connection with the pollination of the Yucca ; and ona new species of Lecaniwm found on the Austrian pine in Wisconsin. The asparagus bettle (Crioceris asparagi), he finds is extending south, having been observed in Fairfax County, Virginia. During the present year there has been a most remarkable swarming of the butterfly Apatura celtis in the Southern States. These migrations generally take place in the autumn, but this was in the Spring. The only way of accounting for it is that the conditions were unusually favourable for their hibernation and development. Dr. Lintner spoke of the alarming increase of the Larch Saw-Fly (Nematus erich- sonit). He gavea history of the dates and places at which it had been heretofore observed, and the injury it had done. On July 7th it was reported to him from St. Lawrence Co., N. Y. where it appeared on three Tamaracks growing ina door-yard. About 10th July they appeared in count- less hosts completely covering the trees so that the end of a finger could not be placed on a branch of one of them without touching one or more of the worms. They also covered apple and maple trees and shrubbery, but ate nothing but Tamarack. About the same time examples of the larva were received from Otsego Co., taken from the European Larch. The pupz were found after July 12th under moss some little distance from the trees. It has done considerable damage also in Hamilton County in the Adirondack region. Every Tamarack for miles around was entirely stripped, and looked as though the fire had been through it. Dr. Packard says the attack is not fatal to the trees, and near Lake Pleasant early in August he observed the Tamaracks putting out new buds. The larve were attacked by a Podisus allied to modestus, and the pupze were eaten by ants. In Europe the species seemed to be kept in check pretty well by its parasites, and it has never been destructive there. Prof. Riley said we can hardly hope with Dr. Packard that the attack will not be fatal to the trees. When he went over the ground in Maine with Dr. Packard this spring, many trees were already dead. In the evening a very pleasant party met at Mr. Graef’s residence in Brooklyn where the evening was spent in examining Mr. Graef’s collection and discussing the merits of the collation provided. On Monday, 15th, Mr Emerton read a paper by Prof. L. M. Underwood, on ‘«The Literature of the North American Spiders,” reviewing the work thus far done in the Arachnide. : Mr. Smith made some remarks on the paper mentioning the work being done by students of the group and that the U.8. National Museum was accumulating a very fair collection in the class. He also defended the practice of describing species as justi- fiable under some circumstances in stimulating or exciting interest, and claims that nothing is so discouraging to beginners as a lot of material which is unnamed and unnameable until some one monographs the whole. Mr. Emerton said that he intended to continue his work on the New England spiders, and will keep his types, at least until the work is all done. He was opposed to hasty descriptions, and to hasty identifications of old species where there is nothing to 33 identify them by. He preferred to give a new name to an insect rather than to identify it with an old name, unless he was quite sure of his identification. Dr. Hoy spoke of the peculiarities of the Lepidopterous fauna, of Racine, Wis., describing the location of the place, and enumerating some of the Southern butterflies and moths that have been taken there,—among them Zerias Mexicana, Apatura celtis, Argus labruscae, Dilophonota ello, and Erebus Zenobia. On Tuesday, 16th, Dr. Lintner spoke on the larva of Haltica Alleni, Harris, now known as H. bimarginata Say, which he found in great numbers near Lake Pleasant, skeletonizing Alder. He exhibited specimens of the larve and pupe. ‘The latter are found naked in moss. It was yellow when found, not white as described by Dr. Packard. Mr. Angell stated that he had recently, for the first time, heard Polyphylla stridu- late. Mr. Dimmock said that Cerixa sometimes makes quite a loud stridulating noise. Some general remarks and questions concerning captures at Sandy Hook followed, and the Club finally adjourned to meet again at 9 a.m., on the first day of next year’s meeting of the A. A. A. S. [For the above account we are much indebted to Mr. J. B. Smith’s Report in Zn- tomologica Americana for September and October, 1887]. ADDENDUM TO THE PAPER ON THE COTTON MOTH IN CANADA. (Page 18.) BY THE REV. C. J. 8. BETHUNE, PORT HOPE, The information brought out during the discussion of my paper on the Cotton Moth —read at the annual meeting of the Entomological Society at Ottawa—has led me to entirely change my views as expressed therein regarding the migration of this insect from the*south to the north. I am now convinced that the moth does come to us from the cotton fields of the south, and is not a native of this country, for the following reasons :— 1. The simultaneous appearance of the moths in vast numbers at Hamilton, Port Hope, and Ottawa can only be accounted for by the migration theory. 2. There are not enough plants in the whole of Canada of the order VMalvacee to provide sustenance for the larve of the moths seen at the above three places alone. 3. The few common plants of this order have not been observed by our entomologists to be attacked by any insect whatever. 4. No specimens of the larve of the cotton moth have ever been found in this Province upon the basswood—the only probable alternative food-plant. 5. The prevailing winds during the week previous to the arrival of the moth were quite favourable to its flight from the south-west. 6. The appearance of the moth in Canada during the many years of its occurrence has always been in the autumn, at the end of September or the beginning of October. At this time of year the cotton fields are pretty well denuded of foliage, and the moth, finding no suitable places for depositing its eggs, flies off to distant localities. Since the meeting of our Society in October, I have endeavored by correspondence to trace the flight of the moth, but though my friends have been very kind in replying to my enquiries, 1 have not been very successful. I wrote to one entomologist in each 3 (EN.) 34 of the following places along the route by which the moth must have most probably come to us. but in nearly every instance the insect was not observed, and did not, at all. — events, appear in any remarkable numbers :-— Rochester, N. Y.—No observation. Buffalo, N. Y.—No reply. Ithaca, N. Y.—No observation. Akron, Ohio—Professor Claypole writes, “I have not seen the cotton moth here: this year. Since the beginning of September I have had twenty-eight students, more or less eagerly in pursuit of Lepidoptera, but I did not see this insect in their collections.” Dayton, Ohio—Mr. G. R. Pilate writes, “I have not noticed Aletia argillacea this. year ; but two years ago, late in the fall, thousands of them were seen around the electric lights for a number of days. Ido not agree with Mr. Grote that they all come from the south. When [ lived in the centre of this city, some five or six years ago, I took a. specimen that had just emerged from a pupa in my garden ; the wings were still soft, and when placed in a glass, it emitted the red fluid that all freshly emerged Lepidop- tera do.” Lafayette, Ind.—Not observed. Champaign, Illinois—Professor Forbes, Director of the State Laboratory of Natural History, writes, ‘‘ The assistant who has had special charge of the electric light collections. this season tells me that he visited the light several times on favourable nights in Sep- tember and October, but took no Aletias. We did not ‘sugar,’ however, but I think it unlikely that any extensive migration should have occurred here without our notice.” Carbondale, Illinois—Mr. G. H. French, Professor of Natural History in the Nor- mal University of Southern Illinois, writes that he has been too much occupied with other matters to make any observations during the past season, but in a collection sent him from Galesburg, in the northern part of the State, he found a specimen of Aletia argillacea, dated October. Coalburgh, West Virginia.—No observation. Allegheny, Pennsylvania.—No observation. Dr. Hamilton writes that “ the locality would be difficult to reach by a moth coming from the cotton regions, as from three to five hundred miles of rugged, uncultivated, mountainous country would intervene. The Alleghany Mountains, commencing in New York, are north and east, and circle round south through Maryland, and westwardly through Virginia, West Virginia, and half through Tennessee, thus shutting off all communication from the south.” In consequence of the geographical features referred to by Dr. Hamilton, I took it for granted that the moth must have come to us from the south-west, and accordingly made my enquiries from friends along its probable route. It is very remarkable that the swarm that visited this Province should not have been seen at any of the places. mentioned above. In order to further determine the probable route of our swarm of cotton moths, I obtained from the Observatory at Toronto, through the kindness of Mr. Carpmael, the Superintendent of the Meteorological Service, a full abstract of the direction and velocity of the winds for each hour during the first nine days of October—a period sufficient to cover the time occupied by the flight of the insects. The observations were, of course, made at Toronto, but they are applicable to Port Hope and Hamilton, and all this portion of the Province of Ontario. On October 1st, the winds were south-west, and very light, averaging 34 miles. an hour, till 6 o’clock a.m. ; south, with increasing velocity up to 16 miles an hour, till noon ; then south-west, and gradually dying away till midnight. Average direction for the day, south, 27° west ; mean velocity, 6.21 ; resultant velocity, 5.84. October 2nd, south-east till 8 a,m., and very light ; from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. changing from west to north, north-west and back to south-east, rising to 9 miles an hour ; during 35 the remainder of the day south and south-east, with diminishing force at night. Average. direction 8. 24° east ; mean velocity, 4.12 ; resultant velocity, 2.44. October 3rd.—Changing from south to east shortly after midnight, and blowing more strongly from the east, up to 12 miles an hour till 7 a.m. ; during the remainder of the day blowing strongly, up to 26 miles an hour, from the south-west, shifting at times to the west. Average direction, S. 43 W. ; mean velocity, 16.21 ; resultant velocity, 11.66. October 4th.—Strong south-west winds (up to 174 miles an hour) till 10 am. ; then blowing harder still, up to 25 miles an hour, from the west, shifting to north-west in the afternoon, and diminishing considerably in force at night (6 miles per hour at 11 p.m.) Average direction §. 85 W. ; mean velocity, 15.58 ; resultant velocity 13.33. October 5th.—North-west winds all day till 7 p.m., when it changed to the west. Average direction N. 54 W.; mean velocity 10.38, resultant velocity 9.89. October 6th.—The west wind continued till 3 a.m., then changed to south-west, and at 9 o’clock to south ; in the afternoon south-east, changing to south and south-west at night, and to west before midnight. Average direction 8. 19 W. ; mean velocity 6.56, resultant velocity 5.55. The winds were highest from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m., and very moderate at night. October 7th.—(The day on which the moths were first observed here.) Very gentle winds west to north-west, varying to north up to noon ; then shifting to north-east and east. A fine, mild day. Average direction N. 10 W.; mean velocity 2.85; resultant velocity 1.09. October 8th.—Winds very light, north-east to east up to noon, then south-east and south till 9 p.m., when they changed to the south-west. Average direction N. 52 E.; mean velocity 4.79 ; resultant velocity 3.10. On this day, and the preceding, the moths were found in the lake and washed up on the shore. The southerly winds of the 6th may have helped the swarm in their flight across the lake, and then the change to northerly and cooler winds may have checked their flight and caused them to drop into the water. October 9th.—Winds gentle, south-east, south and south-west. A very mild day, with a little fine rain at night. Average direction of the wind, S. 18 W.; mean velocity 4,50 ; resultant velocity 4.14. Mr. Carpmael also very kindly sent me a table of the direction and velocity of the wind at Kingston during the same period taken at the usual hours of observation, viz., 7.a.m., 3p.m, 10 p.m. This will assist us as regards the appearance of the moth at Ottawa :—October lst, winds south-west, mean velocity about 7 miles. Oct, 2nd, south in morning, south-west in afternoon and evening ; mean velocity 2 miles. Oct. 3rd, east in morning, south-west afternoon and evening ; mean velocity 9 miles. Oct 4th. south- west in forenoon, south in afternoon, north-east at night ; mean velocity 9 miles. Oct. 5th, north in the morning, north-west in afternoon, west at night ; mean velocity about 4 miles. Oct. 6, west in morning, south-west in afternoon and evening ; mean velocity about 5 miles. ‘Oct. 7th, west in morning, south-west in afternoon, and north- east at night ; mean velocity about 4 miles. Oct. 8th, north-east at each observation ; mean velocity 5 miles. Oct. 9th, north-east in morning, south-west in afternoon and evening ; mean velocity 3 miles. From the above we gather that the direction of the wind was very much the same at Kingston as at Toronto, but the velocity was considerably less at the former station. In addition to the foregoing, I have obtained through Dr. Hamilton a table of similar observations made at Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, by the Signal Service Observer of the U. S,army. This will give us some idea of the prevailing winds to the south of us, and by comparison with the observations at Toronto and Kingston, will help us in the formation of some conclusion regarding the migration of the cotton moth. The Pittsburgh observations were taken at the same hours as those at Kingston, and are, briefly, as follows :---Oct. lst, winds south-west throughout the day ; mean velocity Se ee ele = ed 36 -about 6 miles. Oct. 2nd, south-west in morning, west in afternoon, south in evening ; mean velocity about 7 miles. Oct. 3rd, west morning and afternoon, north-west at night ; mean velocity 15 miles. Oct. 4th, west throughout the day ; mean velocity 10 miles. Oct. 5th, north-west throughout the day ; mean velocity 9 miles. Oct. 6th, south-west morning and afternoon, south at night; mean velocity 10 miles. Oct. 7th, east in the morning, south in afternoon, north at night; mean velocity 4 miles. Oct. 8th, north morning and afternoon, west at night ; mean velocity 2 miles. Oct. 9th, north in morning, west during remainder of the day ; mean velocity about 5 miles. From the foregoing meteorological observations we may certainly gather that there was nothing in either the direction or force of the prevailing winds during the first week of October to prevent the cotton moth from flying to Canada from the southern cotton fields, which lie almost entirely to the south-west of us. In the next place, we . may conclude that the winds during the first few days of October, though light, were such as would help the flight of the moth in this direction. For the first four days they were nearly always south-west or west, and on the 3rd, when they were at their highest velocity in Toronto, they were south-west. On the whole the meteorological conditions were, I consider, distinctly favourable to the migration of the insect from the southern States to Ontario ; the weather was warm, free from frost at night, no heavy showers of rain, a moist atmosphere, and winds for the most part in a direction to aid the flight thitherward. = In conclusion, I must confess myself to have changed from a strenuous supporter of the indigenous theory to an equally firm believer in the opinion upheld by Prof. Riley and Mr. Grote, that the moth may occasionally breed for a season in the north, but that its home is in the south, and that the specimens we observe here have flown to us over wide tracts of country from the cotton fields far away to the south-west. I trust that in future seasons, further observations may be made, and that in time we may be able to trace the route by which this interesting immigrant so frequently travels to our land. POPULAR PAPERS ON ENTOMOLOGY. THE OAK-PRUNER: ELAPHIDION VILLOSUM, Fasr. BY FREDERICK CLARKSON, NEW YORK. In support of the records relating to the periods of transformation of this beetle, and the probable cause of their pruning the branches of the Oak, which I had the pleasure to contribute to the Report for 1885, I now add some further facts, resulting from a recent. visit to Clermont, N. Y. On the 29th of October, I gathered from under a group of Quercus tinctoria seven branehes that had been pruned by this longicorn. The tunnels were from ten to fifteen inches long, in branches from one-half to three-quarters of an inch in thickness. The branches I carefully divided lengthwise, so that the parts could be replaced in position. Six of them contained the pupa, one the larva, which pupated November 4th. One of the pupz I preserved as a specimen. The imagoes appeared on the following days: Nov. 14th, 22nd, 26th, 29th, Dec. 9th and 25th, all females. These transformations were rather hindered than advantaged by meteorological conditions, for they occurred in a room having a northern exposure, in which, during the period of the transformations, the thermometrical record differed but little from that in the shade without. Had the branches remained upon the ground, the included insect would have received all the benefits resulting from the direct rays of our Indian summer’s sun, as well as the moisture from the ground ; influences that ordinarily assist develop- ment. As the imagoes appeared they were examined and replaced in their tunnels, where they now remain in a passive state, and are not likely, I think, to exhibit their natural activity until next May or June. The object of the paper referred to, as well as this article, is to present facts that seemingly disprove certain theories relating to the habits and metamorphoses of this beetle, which have been formulated by distinguished sires and accepted by their credulous sons. What Drs. Peck, Fitch, and Harris have written upon this subject has been sub- stantially repeated by almost every entomologist who has undertaken a history of this beetle. We are very apt to fall into line when we have an abiding confidence in a leader. While I am unwilling to deny the conclusions of these naturalists, I yet think that the facts related go to show that the insect matures at a period earlier than that named by them, and that the benefits supposed to result from a dismemberment of the branch, in so far as the changed environment is concerned, are wholly unnecessary to the develop- ' ment of the included insect, and that there is a plausibility in the inference, if not a. certainty as to fact, that the object of pruning the branch is to prevent the flow of sap. lf the habits of this beetle as given by these doctors are to be regarded as ipso facto, then we must admit the possession of a faculty in these lower organisms that towers above instinct and presents the feature of intelligent reason. This is a subject that cannot very well be discussed in these pages, yet it may not be out of place to say that able writers on the question very generally admit that the habits of insects follow a prescribed law, by some regarded, in a materialistic sense, as mechanical ; and by others, spiritually con- sidered, as in furtherance of a divine edict. This latter view is very cleverly presented by St. George Mivart, in Organic Nature’s Riddle: “Our experience,’ > he writes, “is in favour of the existence of an intelligence which can implant in and elicit from unconscious bodies activities that are intelligent 1 in appearance andresult . . * Uncon- sciously intelligent action,’ improperly called ‘intelligent,’ is that which is called intelligent only as to its results and not in the innermost principle of the creatures which perform 38 such actions.” “Instinct,” Todd says in his Cyclopedia of Anatomy and Physiology, “is a special internal impulse urging animals to the performance of certain actions which are useful to them or to their kind, but the uses of which they do not themselves perceive, and their performance of which is a necessary consequence of their being placed in certain circumstances.” If such definitions are accepted, how are they to be reconciled with the marvellous statement as given by Dr. Fitch? That the larva should prune the branch to prevent the flow of sap would be a necessary consequence of its being placed in certain circum- stances, but to do so that the branch may fall to the ground presents a course of reasoning that relates to a condition foreign to the then existing environment. The habits of this beetle from the period of egg-hatching, as given by Dr. Fitch, displaying as it did to him extraordinary intelligence, impress me as presenting the most natural instinctive - qualities. The ova, he says, is deposited on a small green twig, the soft, pulpy tissues of which nourish the infant larva, which, when increased in size and strength, attacks the hard wood of the branch, transversely, in a circular direction, consuming it all, leaving the branch supported only by the bark. From these premises, without pursuing the subject further, it is evident that the infant larva requires sap-wood for its sustenance, which it derives from the twig, but so soon as its strength permits, it seeks for dead-wood by attacking the branch, which is found more and more free from sap as the work of severance progresses. The aim therefore from the start is to obtain the dead-wood, and when the branch is eaten through the larva continues its feeding in forming a tunnel through that portion of the branch which is cut off from the supply of sap. The instinct of insects is wonderful enough, and more accurate perhaps than a mental process, but while we justly ascribe to them all the attributes pertaining to their natural gift, we are not warranted in imputing to them an intelligence only to be arrived at through a course of reason. THE OAK PRUNER: ELAPHIDION VILLOSUM, Fasnr. BY JOHN HAMILTON, M. D., ALLEGHENY, PA. The account of this insect given by the early fathers of Giconomic Entomology is so charming that it seems almost profane to disturb a history accepted by most of their credulous offspring with unquestioning faith. Its wonderful habits and supra-rational instincts have been stock in trade ever since, and, like the fiction of the fly walking on glass by a sucker arrangement of its feet, is likely to hold its place in paste and scissor literature for all time to come. Divested of all romance and imagination, and descending to facts, the observations of Professor Peck, Fitch and Harris may be reduced to this. In the month of July the parent lays the eggs on the limbs, or in the axil of a leaf near the end of the twigs of that year’s growth of various species of oak, and perhaps other trees. After hatching, the young larva (in the latter case) penetrates to the pith and devours it downwards till the woody hase is reached, and so onward to the centre of the main limb; here it eats away a considerable portion of the inside of the limb, and then plugging the end of the burrow, which it excavates towards the distal end, eventually falls to the ground with the limb, which being weakened, is broken off by the high autumnal winds. They exist here either as larve or pupe till spring, and emerge in June as perfect beetles. Time, one year, though not so stated in words. The account given in detail below is so different from the above, that were the identity of the individuals not established by actual comparison and by recognized authority, it might well be asserted I had given an account of some other Hlaphidion. April, 1883, I procured a barrel of hickory limbs from a tree girdled early in 1882 ; the limbs were from one-half to one inch in diameter. Very few things developed from them that season ; but the next (1884) quite a number of species came forth—Clytanthus ee ruricola and albofasciatus, Neoclytus luscus and erythrocephalus, Stenosphenus notatus, etc. Many larve of some Cerambycide continued to work on under the bark ; late in the fall I observed that most of these had penetrated the wood, but some remained under the bark till April and May of the next year (1885). The most of the beetles appeared during the first two weeks of June, though individuals occurred occasionally till September. A few Jarvee were still found at work, but by October they, likewise, had bored into the wood and appeared as beetles the next June (1886). The normal period of metamorphosis is ‘therefore three years, but in individuals it may be retarded to four or more years. At the present writing (June 5th) these beetles are issuing in great numbers from a barrel of hickory limbs obtained ‘in April, 1885, from a tree deadened in January, 1884, thus verifying the first observation. How the larve get under the bark could not be ascertained. When first examined, in April, they were from 4 to 5 m.m. long; they ate the wood under the bark, following its grain, and packed their burrow solidly with their dust. The growth and progress were both slow, for by the next April they had scarcely more than doubled in length, and had not travelled more than from four to six inches during the year; but after July they developed an enormous appetite, and consumed the wood for at least an inch in length, and often entirely around the limb, ejecting their castings through holes made in the bark. When full fed they bore obliquely an oval hole into the wood, penetrating it from four to ten inches. The larva then packs the opening with fine castings and enlarges a couple of inches of the interior of the burrow by gnawing off its sides a quantity. of coarse fibre, in which it lies, after turning its head to the entrance. When about to become a pupa (I witnessed the process), the skin ruptures on the dorsum of three or four segments next the head ; the head of the pupa appears, and after about half an hour’s wriggling the whole body is divested of its covering. To the observer the pupa appears to crawl out of the skin, but in fact the skin with the large mandibles is forced backwards by the alternate extension and contraction of the segments, assisted materially by the fibre that surrounds it. After its soft body hardens, the same movements free it from the fibre, some being shoved in advance of the head, and some posteriorly, the exuvie being often found at the distal end of the hole. The time spent in the pupal state is indefinite, and does not seem to concern greatly the time of the appearance of the beetle. Sticks split open at different periods from December till March contained larve and pupz about equally, but no developed beetles. A larva that I observed to go into the wood in April appeared as a beetle among the first of such as had presumably pupated in the fall. The number of these beetles obtained that and the present season was great, and afforded a good opportunity to observe individual variations, and they do differ greatly. In length from 8 to 18 m.m.; in pubescence, some being nearly naked and unicoloured, others having it longer and condensed into spots or almost vittate ; some being quite slender and elongate, while others are short and broad ; the surface of the elytra is mostly uniform, but in some, especially such as are narrow and elongated, one or two coste are more or less evident. _ Now, although this account differs so widely from that given by Mr. Fitch, still the beetles are the same. Unfortunately, I have never been able to find any pruned oak limbs from which to obtain the insect myself, but I have a good set from Mr. Blanchard, of Mass., presumably from the oak, which are identical, Through the kindness of Mr. F. Clarkson, [ have a set of those described by him in the Can. E£nt., vol. 17, p. 188, from oak limbs, and which became imagoes in November, and there is no perceptible difference. Dr. Geo. H. Horn says, “They are the same.” To identify Zlaphidion parallelum had always been a puzzle to me, and I once thought I had a real set ; I obtained it about a dozen times by exchange, but could never be satisfied that the specimens received were not pauperized, or peculiar individuals of Z. villosum. On comparing my hickory insects with all the descriptions of Z. villoswm and parallelum and their several synonyms, as far as I possess them, it was easy to pick out sets that would answer satisfactorily all their requirements, and I became satisfied that £. parallelum could not be separated. er 40 An inquiry of Dr. Geo. H. Horn elicits the following note and kind permission to use it :— “Regarding the two species of Hlaphidion (villoswm and parallelum) of which you write, I can only say that my opinion, based on the series in my cabinet and an examina- tion of those in the cabinet of Dr. Leconte, is that they are inseparable. The slight differences, referred to by Dr. Leconte, in the last ventral segment of the males, are not real but dependent on the angle at which they are seen.” The differences referred to are that in £. villoswm the last ventral segment of the male is rounded, while in parallelwm it is emarginate. The only other structural difference mentioned by Dr. Leconte is, “ Prothorax scarcely longer than wide—villosum. “ Prothorax distinctly longer than wide—parallelum.” From the insects before me from the hickory, it is easy to pick out some with the thorax fully one-fourth wider than long, and others with it one-fourth longer than wide, but they are brought together so insensibly by intermediates, that where the proper separation into species should begin it is impossible to decide. The same may be said of the differences in elongation, narrowness, and pubescence ; and [ can find no basis for retaining parallelum as even a racial or varietal name. I trust the foregoing may stimulate such as have opportunity to investigate the habits of this interesting beetle more thoroughly. I mention some of the points that require clearing up. First, the length of time occupied in the metamorphosis of such as breed in the branches of living trees. One year is certainly an error, as it is opposed to the known history of any other Cerambycide having a similar habit. Second, whether the falling of the limb is not accidental, the majority containing larve not being weakened enough to break. Third, whether the end of the limb remaining on the tree does not. contain the insect equally with that which falls—points that might be determined by cutting down a tree in autumn from which limbs had been pruned. Fourth, to make a collection for comparison from each species of tree infested. Besides the accounts of Professors Peck, Fitch, and Harris, the following bibliography may be noticed :— Haldeman—Trans. Am. Phil. Soc., vol. 10, p. 34. Larva feeds on the living [?] wood of oak, hickory, and chestnut ; also, dead Abies. Riley—American Ent., vol. 2, p. 60; 2b. vol. 3, p. 239. Larva bores in plum and apple twigs, and in dry grape cane, Missouri Rep., 3, p. 6. Bores into and prunes the limbs of the apple. Jb. 4, p. 54. Bred abundantly from injured grape stems. Rathvon—U. 8. Agricultural Rep., 1861, p. 615. Merely a synopsis of Fitch’s account. Packard, jr.—Bul., No. 7, p. 30. U.S. Entomological Commission. Scissored from Fitch in full. Olarkson—Can. Ent., vol. 17, p. 188, and vol. 19, p. 31. Discovers that the insect completes its metamorphosis in the fall and early winter, in oak limbs, and takes issue with Peck, Fitch, and Harris on several points. Townsend, Can. Ent., vol. 18, p. 12. Thinks Mr. Clarkson’s discovery the exception, and not the rule, in the time of | metamorphosis. 41 THORN AND WILLOW BORERS: SAPERDA FAYI AND S. CONCOLOR. | BY JOHN HAMILTON, M.D., ALLEGHENY, PA. Saperpa Fay1, Bland.—This beautiful Saperda breeds in the small limbs of Crataegus. especially crus-galli and tomentosa, as first observed by Mr. O. D. Zimmermann, Can. Ent., 10, 220 ; and should it, like some of its allies, acquire a taste for cultivated fruit trees, it would be a formidable enemy, as is evidenced by the way it depredates on thorn ‘bushes, The beetles appear here the last week in May or the first week in June, accord- ing to the season, the males preceding the females three or four days. They do not appear to eat, and are short lived, the whole brood (except stragglers) appearing and disappearing within the space of ten or twelve days, so that should the collector be negligent, or the. weather unsuitable for collecting at the time of their appearance, he may get none till the next season. As soon as the females appear the males are ready to associate with them, _ the union lasting three or four hours. They are not much given to flying about, usually ovipositing on the same tree they inhabited as larve. There may be several thorn trees not far apart, and one will be depredated on year after year till it is nearly destroyed, while the others will remain untouched till colonized apparently by accident. The beetles are sluggish, and when approached suddenly fall to the ground and quickly endeavour to conceal themselves, not feigning death, as many insects under the same circumstances do ; and when I say feigning death, I mean it literally, in opposition to an unsupported dogmatic statement which I lately saw in print somewhere, “that insects can have no knowledge of death.” Oviposition is effected probably during the night, and the process has not been witnessed nor the eggs seen. The limbs selected for this purpose vary from one-third to one and one-fourth inches in diameter, and according to the thickness of the limb, the female with her powerful mandibles makes from three to six longitudinal incisions through the bark, each about three-fourths of an inch long and equi-distant and parallel to one another, dividing the circumference into sections nearly equal ; an egg is placed in each end of each of these slits, and as soon as hatched the larva makes a burrow beneath the outer layer of wood, perhaps one-eighth inch in length at first, and uses this as a retreat whence it issues to feed on the diseased wood caused by the incision. These slits and the irrita- tion produced by so many larve at work, cause an increased flow of sap to the part, and a consequent thickening of the sections between the slits, so that the injured part soon assumes a gall-like appearance. On the approach of winter, the larve having now attained the length of .25 inch, retire back a little further and close the opening of their burrows with borings. One of the larve, however, and in thick limbs two or three at each end bore obliquely till one of them reaches the centre of the limb, up which it proceeds, often two or three inches; the others parallel this, but keepa wooden partition between the burrows. These larve are much larger—often twice the size—of those inhabiting the outer wood, and are the only ones that produce beetles. The whole of the interior of the limb is now dead wood enclosed by a growth of living but unsound woody tissue, through which some openings remain. ‘The limbs are much weakened at these places, and many of them, like the oak on which Llaphidion villosum depredates, would be broken off by the winter storms were the fibre not very tough and the trees very low. And here analogy leads to the conclusion that as the larve inhabit the portion of the limb next the tree, equally with that beyond the injured part, this is likely to be the case in the history of the Elaphidion mentioned. Many of the larvz in the outside wood perish during the winter, and the survivors, after feeding a while in the spring, likewise die, their mission seeming to have been merely to insure a sufficiency of dead wood to sustain the life of the favoured few destined for full development. In the spring the larve in the deep wood return and feed on the dead wood, which is now abundant enough for all their wants, and by autumn they are nearly full grown 42 they again retire for the winter, and in the spring, after opening up communication with the outside world, feed for a short time, and when full grown measure in length about three-fourths of an inch. The larve now return to their burrows for final transformation. Some of them bore for at least six inches, while others scarcely go from the entrance more than twice their own lengths ; the outer ends are closely packed with borings without and soft fibre within, which also fills the inner ends. The head of the larva may be either toward or away from the opening—seemingly a matter of indifference ; in the former case the beetle emerges from the place of entrance, in the latter from a round hole at right angles to the burrow, probably cut by the beetle itself, as no such hole has been detected in the many limbs I have examined containing pup with their heads turned from the opening. Pupation occurs after the middle of April, and the perfected beetle will be found in the limbs about the first of May, though few of them emerge till the time stated at the beginning of this paper. The above is the result of three years’ careful observation of the habits of this beetle» and imperfect as the history is, the amount of time and labor expended in developing it can only be understood by those who have attempted similar things. How widely this beetle is distributed is uncertain, as till recently its habitat was unknown. The typical insects were taken in Ohio; it is in Mr. Reinecke’s Buffalo Catalogue, and occurs at Hamilton, Ontario (Moffat). Any one can readily ascertain whether it occurs in his fauna by examining the limbs of the Crataegus for the unmistakable swellings it occasions. SAPERDA CoNncoLor Lec. appears about the same time as S. Fayi, and like it, is short lived, few individuals occurring after the middle of June. Its larve infest the canes of a small willow growing along watercourses and in swampy places—Salix longifolia. The smaller canes are usually selected for breeding purposes, these varying from one-fourth to three-fourth inches in diameter. The beetle makes a longitudinal incision through the bark with her jaws about three-fourths of an inch in length, and in each end deposits an egg. Usually several incisions are made in the same cane some distance apart, which often cause its death the following year. The young larve follow the same course as those of 8. Fayi, only they burrow deeper into the wood, and there are no supernumeraries, as there is no need for them, the wood of the willow dying much more quickly than that of Crataegus, and a warty, gnarly swelling occurring around each incisure. The beetle, however, does not always select the smaller canes, sometimes choosing ones from one and one-half to two inches thick, in which case the larve pursue a different course, for instead of boring up and down, they take a transverse direction and girdle the stem one-third to one-half its circumference, causing a rough, annular swelling and frequently the death of the cane. Two years is the time usually required to complete the transformation, but some individuals probably pass through all the stages in a single year. The head of the pupa is toward the opening, from which the perfect insect emerges. The willow named seems to be the natural food tree of the larve of S. concolor, and, did it confine itself to this insignificant shrub, could scarcely be classed with injurious insects ; but it appears to have likewise either a natural or an acquired taste for poplar, and might become very destructive, a fact first brought to notice in Bul. No. 7, 118, U.S. Ent. Com., where the compiler writes: “Girdling the trunks of sapling poplars, by carrying a mine around the trunk, which causes a swelling often nearly twice the diameter of the tree. We have found numerous saplings of the common poplar in the woods about Providence with the unsightly swellings around the trunk.” In case this taste is perpetuated, this beetle will no doubt prove a formidable enemy to this species of shade or forest tree. But in what State this Providence is, or what kind of a tree ‘“‘common poplar” is, we are not informed. Here the common poplar is the Liriodendron tulipifera, but at that Providence it may be a tree of some other genus. This beetle seems to have an extended distribution, occurring in Texas, Michigan, Canada, and New York, as well as here. : ~ ee ee a 43 NOTES ON THE LOCUSTID A. BY WM. T. DAVIS, STATEN ISLAND, N. Y. Whether they fill the listener with a train of happy thoughts, as Gilbert White says, or whether they produce a sadness because the days of summer are nearly gone, as Dr. Harris asserts, the songs of crickets and other Orthoptera have, nevertheless, the merit of always being interesting. An insect that can sing—that has something to say—even though it be the same, night after night, enjoys a sort of individuality, and this long discussion of the Katydids and the quiet murmur of the tree crickets, constitute one of the chief charms of our summer evenings. But they do not always sing or stridulate quite alike, and sometimes, too, their shrilling apparatus is slightly deformed or injured, producing some curious sounds when i in use. I once heard a Katydid whose singing apparatus was out of order, and the sounds given forth contrasted strangely with those of a rival male in an adjoining tree. Ambly- corypha retinervis produces two somewhat different songs, or perhaps more correctly, varies the same song in time or extent of utterance, so that unless the same individual is listened to for some time, the notes might be attributed to different species. This insect often lays its eggs on the honeysuckle, and I once observed a female on the 16th of Sept., ovi- positing on a low tree by the roadside, gradually biting the bark into a ridge, along which the eggs were laid, tile fashion. On Staten Island, the first Conocephalus that is heard in the garden is ensiger, and with ik-ik-ik, as if sharpening a saw, enlivens low bushes and particularly the corn patch. This insect seems to especially delight in perching near the top of a corn-stalk and there giving forth its rather impulsive song. I have often watched one crawl, with many a spiral turn, up the stem, fiddling all the while. My notes on its first heard stridulation show considerable uniformity, and the average date may be taken as July 15th. Conocephalus dissimilis is more of a low grass and weed loving insect than C. ensiger, and also comes later in the season. I have found this insect stridulating when its head was gone, picked off perhaps by some vagrant chick. The brown coloured specimens are much more common in this species than in ensiger. Conocephalus robustus resides for the most part mid the grass on sandy ground near the sea shore, though an occasional individual finds its way inland. Along the sea beach they stridulate in early afternoon, especially if slightly cloudy, and when approached they have a curious fashion of dropping to the ground. I have often found them, on such occasions, actually standing on their heads in the soft sand, leaning against the grass stems which grow so close together, without in any way holding on to them. Whether this position is intentional or not, I cannot say, but certain it is that when looked for from above they offer the smallest extent of their bodies to view and may thus escape many enemies. I have found another Conocephalus on Staten Island, mid the cat-tails that grow on the salt meadows, and a specimen sent to Mr. Samuel H. Scudder was considered by that ‘gentleman to be an undescribed species. This insect keeps very close to the ground, hiding well in the vegetation, and is not easily discovered. The sound produced when stridulating is very faint, not louder than that made by Gryllus abbrinatus, and I was much surprised to hear such a faint song come from so large an insect. I have, in conse- quence of this faint song, named it the “ slightly musical” Conocephalus, C. exiliseanorus. HINTS ON COLLEOTING HYMENOPTERA. BY W. HAGUE HARRINGTON, OTTAWA. To have the specimens in a collection look well, and at the same time be in a condi- tion such as to render their examination as easy as possible, it is necessary that they should be properly collected. The ordinary cyanide bottles prepared either with plaster of Paris, or sawdust which are used for Lepidoptera and Coleoptera, do not furnish good 44 specimens of Hymenoptera, and those collected in alcohol are less satisfactory. I have found the method advised by Dr. Williston (Psyche, vol. iv., p. 130) for collecting Diptera, so satisfactory that I will quote a portion of his description :— “T select several two-ounce, wide-mouthed bottles of the same form, and carefully line the bottom and sides with a good quality of blotting paper. Good firm corks are selected, which are interchangeable in the different bottles; in one of these corks a small hole is made, in which it is better to fit a small metallic ferule ; a strip of blotting paper is then coiled within this cavity, and it is over this that a few drops of a solution of cyanide of potash is poured.” For those who may not desire to keep on hand a solution of this poison, I would suggest a modification of this method which I find very satisfactory. Scrape a few grains of cyanide into the cavity in the cork and then insert a small wad of damp cotton wool or sponge. The fumes will be readily given off, and it is only necessary to occasionally renew the cyanide. As Dr. Williston suggests, it is well to have several bottles, but it is sometimes impossible for the collector to take more than the minimum amount of apparatus, and he will then limit himseif to two, reserving one of them for delicate or small insects. Bees should never be placed in a bottle with previous captures, as honey is often disgorged, and the specimens greatly injured by the matting of pubescence and soiling of the wings ; the pollen which the bees so generally carry is almost as bad in its. effects. The safest and most desirable plan is for the collector to carry a supply of small pasteboard pill boxes, and transfer his specimens frequently to these, putting only one specimen of such insects as Bombus in a box. These boxes can be obtained of very small sizes, permitting a sufficient number to be packed in asmall space. Their use ensures perfect specimens and enables the collector to keep a better record of them by numbering the boxes, and in his field note-book entering full particulars of the contents of each. When possible, it is better to pin the insects before they stiffen, but if time or circum- stances do not permit of this, they will keep safely in the boxes, and may be at any time easily relaxed in a damp atmosphere, care being taken not to allow them to become wet. In pinning, it is not at all necessary to set the wings and feet symmetrically, unless one- has plenty of time and desires pretty specimens. The wings, however, should be separated, so as to admit of a full examination of the venation both of the anterior and posterior ones, and of the metathorax and the basal segments of the abdomen. USE OF CHLOROFORM IN COLLECTING. BY J. A, JACKSON, DES MOINES, IOWA. In the article of Henry S. Saunders, on Oollecting at the Electric Light (Can. E£nt.,. Feb., 1887), he gives his experience in the use of cyanide of potassium and chloroform as. follows: “‘ Cyanide of potasium I found the best poison; a few drops of chloroform on cotton would quiet them more quickly, but was more troublesome, the chloroform having to be frequently renewed, occasionally as often as four or five times during the same- evening, and sometimes even then the moths would be found alive the next morning.” I should like to explain my method of collecting with chloroform. I have found it better than any other, whether at the electric light or in the field : Take a glass fruit jar, one in which the lid screws down upon a rubber cushion or packing. Puta bunch of cotton in the bottom, retaining it in its place by pressing down upon it a circular piece of pasteboard, made to fit tightly in the jar, except that two or three notches should be left in the edge for the chloroform to run through to the cotton. Saturate the cotton with chloroform and screw the lid down tight. The bottle is now ready for use, and it will be found that an insect dropped into it will be suffocated almost instantly by the fumes of chloroform that completely fill the bottle. A feeble flutter for a second, a kick or two, and all is over. As soon as the insect is dropped into the bottle, screw the lid down again, and as it fits air tight, the chloroform will not evaporate too. rapidly. Less than a teaspoonful will last for a whole evening’s work. If on retiring: 45 OOO ao ee “($$$ (s(n eee from the work the chloroform seems nearly exhausted, it would be well to pour in a few drops more, and then close the lid for the night. If these precautions are taken the insects will never revive. Chloroform, when used in this manner, will be found to possess many advantages -over any other poison. It is quicker in its action, much more convenient, and under all circumstances entirely harmless. I use this form of collecting bottle both for the electric light and in the field. The bottle will contain, without injury to the specimens, the captures of a whole evening, or a whole day. If, through carelessness, so much chloroform has been poured into the bottle as to saturate the pasteboard on which the specimens rest, their wings may become moistened and somewhat damaged. To prevent accidents of this character, pack a bunch of crumpled newspaper tightly down on the pasteboard before putting in any specimens ; the paper will be dry, and will prevent the insects from coming in contact with the moist pasteboard. For Coleoptera I use a morphine bottle prepared in the same way, except that the newspaper is not wanted, and it is closed with a cork. I always carry such a bottle in my pocket ready primed, and thus am always prepared for preserving any specimens captured incidentally while engaged in other affairs. A PRACTICAL NOTE ON COLLECTING INSECTS. BY PROF, E. W. CLAYPOLE, AKRON, OHIO. In reference to the above two notes on collecting, will you allow me to make a few remarks? Entomology is with me a secondary subject, my time being for the most part occupied with another science. Perhaps this has led me to devise means for economizing time and labor more than I should otherwise have done; but the study of insects has great attraction for me, and I spend no little time upon it. The method which I desire to mention may be too well known to deserve any space in your columns—if so, I can only ask you to overlook my intrusion—but I have never seen it mentioned in print anywhere, nor have I ever seen it used by any entomologist of my acquaintance. Perhaps also there may be some objections to its adoption which I have not discovered in the course of several years’ use. In that case I shall be glad to learn them. Your contributors speak of chloroform and cyanide of potassium as their favourite insecticide materials. Both these I have abandoned for some years, the former because it is expensive, and the latter because it is unpleasant and dangerous, especially the latter to young students, and both because they are comparatively imperfect in their effects, _For example: I have often known an insect, especially one of the large bodied Bombycids, that recovered after having been apparently killed by chloroform, and even after having been pinned out in the case. The result usually is that it is seriously injured by flapping about. Chloroform is an anesthetic and not a poison, and its effect soon passes off unless its action is renewed or long continued so as to insure death. ; In regard to cyanide of potassium, I may state that last year I found one of my cases bady infested with the fur moth (7. pellionella). I put an open bottle containing -eyanide of potassium into the case and closed it. For a fortnight it remained so, when desiring to know the result of the poison, I opened it. It was strongly impregnated with the well known smell of cyanide. To my surprise, however, I could not find a dead moth, and the larve were as lively, after breathing for fourteen days the so-called deadly atmosphere, as if they had been all the time in the open air. As a substitute for both of these I have for years used no other insecticide for the purpose of killing my specimens than benzine or gasoline. The latter at fourteen cents a gallon, is merely nominal in cost oe es eS 46 and perfectly efficacious in action. I use it without hesitation on the Lepidoptera in any quantity. With most of them it causes instant death, and with the few that slightly resist its effects the resistance is very short-lived. I recollect one day seeing a large Cecropia moth enter the room where I was sitting and alight on the knob of the door handle. I took my bottle of gasoline and poured some of the liquid on the body of the insect, when it dropped to the floor as if shot and never moved a wing. The result is not in all cases quite so rapid, but it is never tedious. By this means I prevent the mis- chief that ensues when a fine specimen flutters in a bottle of cyanide or chloroform for several minutes, as is often the case. _ I employ the same plan with all insects, and with equal success. The moths that so long resisted the cyanide vapour, as mentioned above, at once yielded to the deadly gasoline, and in five minutes not a living larva was left in the case. ; I need scarcely add that the use of this exceedingly volatile liquid never in the least degree injures the delicate plumage of the Lepidoptera. Many of my best specimens have been repeatedly drenched with gasoline. In five or ten minutes they are as dry as before it was applied. Let me add one word more. I find the most convenient way of applying the gaso- line is to carry it in an ounce phial, having a cork through which passes a finely pointed glass tube. The large outer end of this tube is capped with a small india-rubber capsule. The whole may be bought at a drug store for a few cents, under the name of a dropping tube: In this way the tube is always full of liquid ready to be squirted out on an insect in the net or even at rest in the open air, and the specimen is at once fit to be pinned out. This I do on the spot in a cigar box, or in one lined with cork, and so avoid an accumulation of material, which is a great annoyance to a man whose time is otherwise occupied, or indeed to any one at the end of a hard day’s work. The small weight of the outfit here required is an advantage not to be overlooked when compared with the weight of the loaded cyanide bottle usually employed. There are one or two other points which I should like to mention, but having already written , more than at the outset I intended, I will forbear. BOOK NOTICES. The Butterflies of North America. By W. H. Edwards. Third Series, Part L, 4to- Houghton, Mifflin & Co., Boston. It is with very great pleasure that we receive from our esteemed contributor, Mr. W. H. Edwards, the First Part of the Third Series of his magnificent work, ‘“‘ The Butterflies of North America.” The last part of Volume [I. was issued in November, 1884. It is a matter of deep congratulation to all Lepidopterists that the talented author now sees his way to resume publication ; but we regret exceedingly to learn from a notice in Science, of 4th February, that to enable him to continue his unselfish labours he had to sacrifice many of the valuable type specimens in his collection. The Part which has just come to hand contains three plates and nine pages of descriptive letter-press. Of the former, which have been executed under the supervision of Mrs. Mary Peart, it is not too much to say that they are exquisite, and are all equal to the very best in Vols. I. and II. Plate I. which is accompanied by a complete life history, illustrates Colias Hurydice Bd., var. Bernardino Edw., in all its stages, from egg to maturity, and also a female of var. Amorphe Hy. Edw. On Plate II, we have a life-like representation of Argynnis Nitocris Edw., male and female. 47 On Plate III. we find figures of Argynnis Lais Edw., a pretty little species (but belonging to the same group as Cybele, Atlantis, and Hlecta), discovered in the Northwest Territories by Capt. Gamble Geddes, in July, 1883. The artist has been particularly happy in the coloration of this plate, especially so in catching the peculiar dull ochrey- brown tint which is characteristic of thé female. Of most interest to Canadians, however, is the fact that although this species is abundant in certain parts of the Northwest Territories, easily accessible, and comparatively well settled, nothing is known of its preparatory stages. The eggs of the species belonging to the same group are easily obtainable by tying females over growing plants of violets. Surely some of the readers of the Canadian Entomologist have friends living in the Calgary District, or at McLean, where it is very abundant, who, even if not entomologists, would, were the scientific importance of the results placed before them, at any rate take the trouble to confine a few females in gauze bags over living plants, and send Mr. Edwards the eggs. There is very little trouble about this matter ; living roots of violets can be sent by mail in a piece of oiled-paper, and will grow easily, if kept watered, in any of the tins used for canned vegetables (flower-pots are rare commodities in the N. W. T.) All that is neces- sary is to bend two pieces of wire so as to make a pent-house over the plant, and then placing a bag of muslin over the whole, secure it by means of an elastic band round the. top of the can. This should be kept out of doors in a shady spot. The importance of Mr. Edwards’s studies of the Diurnal Lepidoptera of North America is perhaps hardly appreciated, until we remember that, with the exception of a few of our commonest butterflies, almost nothing was known of their life-histories until he turned his attention to them in 1868. At the present time, however, it is far other- wise ; for by close study, diligent care, and accurate observation, he has himself worked out the complete life-histories of a large proportion of the recorded North American species. Moreover, many discoveries of great interest have rewarded his constant efforts : The tri-morphism of Papilio Ajax and Colias Eurytheme, the seasonal dimorphism first of Grapta Interrogationis, then of others in the same genus, as well as the effects of cold upon larve and the perfect insects, may especially be referred to, _ There was a marked advance in Vol. If. over Vol. I. in the amount of information given concerning the life-histories of the species described. This is accounted for in the prefatory notice of the present part as follows :— “When Vol. I. was undertaken, in 1868, nothing was known by mys : ’ , elf or a else, of eggs, larvee, or chrysalids, except of the more common tee id As an ps larva could but rarely be traced back to a particular female, it was impossible that much knowledge could be gained of the life-histories. Scarcely any advance in this respect had been made, in fact, since the time of Abbott, about 1800. . . . But in 1870, I dis. covered an infallible way to obtain eggs from the female of an i namely, by confining her with the growing food-plant . . . i ae Fe present I have so obtained eggs at will and have reared larve withodt end In this way, many cases of polymorphism have been established, and the position of man doubtful forms settled. A light has also been thrown on the limits of variation in s hice! In every case I have preserved descriptions of the several stages Of oa e proportion, also, Mrs. Peart has executed colored drawings, magnified when necess : and my albums contain nearly one thousand figures.” : ae Mr. Edwards concludes: “ And so, in this Ciristmas time of 1886, I commend Vol BE. t i i i at, the good will of the friends who have made my small audience for so many Surely we may go further—a long way further—than this, an i to the few friends who have had the ion Erste to listen to Mr. Tavern Gee at the past, and perhaps to catch some of his enthusiasm ; but also to every anhomplonte Oo possessor of a library, whether in America or any other part of the world, who wishes - have the most complete, as far as it goes, accurate, and, for the style of the work, the cheapest—in short, the best—work yet published upon the Butterflies of North America 48 The Butterflies of North America. By W. H. Edwards, Third Series, Part II. The second part of the new series of this superb work contains the usual three exquisitely finished coloured plates of butterflies. The first illustrates the Californian Colias Harfordii Hy. Edwards, and its variety Barbara, giving no less than nine pictures of the imagines, and more than a dozen of the earlier stages ; the second Argynnis Coronis Behr., giving both the upper and under surfaces of the male and female of this beautiful Californian species, which extends northward as far as our own Northwest Territory, where it has been taken by Capt. Gamble Geddes ; the third plate fully illustrates all the stages of Veonympha Gemma Hubn. and WV. Henshawi Edw. There is the usual letter- press description of all the species tigured, and also a notice of Argynnis Callippe Boisd. It is hardly necessary to add that no Lepidopterist’s library can be considered complete without a copy of this admirable work. Report of Observations of Injurious Insects and Common Farm Pests during the year 1886, with Methods of Prevention and Remedy. By Eleanor A. Ormerod, 8vo., 112 pages. London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co. We must congratulate our esteemed friend upon the publication of her Tenth Report. It is full of interesting matter and well illustrated with excellent wood-cuts, chiefly the work of the talented authoress. The principal noxious insects treated of are ‘‘ Earwigs” affecting cabbage—a pest that we are happily free from in this country ; Clover Weevils, the Hessian Fly and other wheat insects, the Hop Aphis, Mustard Beetles, the Horse and Ox Warble-flies, etc. Economic Entomologists everywhere may learn much from these pages ; though the insects treated of are for the most part British, many of them have been transported to this side of the Atlantic and to other distant regions, where they have wrought incalculable damage to crops of various kinds. Synopsis of the Hymenoptera of America, North of Mexico. By E. T. Cresson. Part I. Families and Genera. 8vo., 154 pages. This valuable work, published as a supplementary volume by the American Entomo- logical Society in Philadelphia, is a very much needed contribution to the literature of this difficult order of insects. With this assistance towards classification, we trust that many will be encouraged to collect and study these particularly interesting creatures. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, and Proceedings of the Entomological Section of the Academy of Natural Sciences. Philadelphia. Vol. xiii., 1886. This volume is replete, as usual, with papers of high scientific value by such well- known authorities as Dr. Horn on Coleoptera, Messrs. Ashmead, Blake, and Howard on Hymenoptera, The Rev. Messrs. Holland and Hulst on Lepidoptera, and Prof. Williston on Diptera. : The Mulberry Silk-worm : being a Manual of Instructions in Silk Culture. By Prof. OC. V. Riley. Bulletin No. 9. Division of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agriculture. 49 Our Shade Trees and their Insect Defoliators ; being a consideration of the four most injurious species which affect the trees of the Capital; with means of destroying them. By Prof. 0. V. Riley. Bulletin No. 10. The species referred to are the Elm-leaf Beetle (Galerucha xanthomelena Schrank.) ; the Bag Worm (Thyridopteryx ephemereformis Haw.) ; the White-marked Tussock-moth (Orgyia leucostigma Sm. & Abbot) ; and the Fall Web-worm (Hyphantria cunea Drury). Reports of Experiments with Various Insecticide Substances, chiefly upon insects affecting garden crops, made under the direction of the Entomologist. Bulletin No. 11. Miscellaneous Notes on the Work of the Division of Entomology for the season of 1885, Prepared by the Entomologist. Bulletin No. 12. These four works abundantly testify to the value of the Government Commission on Entomology at Washington, and to the ability and industry of its members. Arsenical Poisons for the Codling Moth (Carpocapsa pomonella L.) By Dr. 8S. A. Forbes, State Entomologist of Illinois. Bulletin No. 1. Another valuable contribution to Economic Entomology, the result of careful and painstaking work in the field. Rhopalocera Malayana: A description of the Butterflies of the Malay Peninsula. . By W. L. Distant. London, 1882-86, 486 pages, 46 plates. A short time ago we called attention to a work in progress on the Butterflies in India. Immediately thereafter there came to hand the final part of another notable work on the butterflies of a region still nearer our antipodes—the Malay Peninsula. In this instance the work was undertaken by the author under peculiarly favourable circum- stances, inasmuch as all pecuniary anxiety was removed by the appearance of a Maecenas in the person of Mr. D. Logan, of Penang, to whom all credit is due by naturalists the world over, not only for the generous way in which he has allowed the work to be gotten up and illustrated, but for his excellent choice of an author. For Mr. Distant, on his side, has performed his task in a very scholarly manner, and given us a book leaving little to be desired, beyond that constant and bitter craving of naturalists for a knowledge of the earlier stages of life of the insects treated. We could indeed wish that the structural characteristics of the larger divisions had been more amply treated, and that the author had not rested satisfied with groupings in the Lycaenine and Hesperide, newly manu- factured, confessedly artificial and temporary, and to which the very descriptions which follow do violence. But the excellence of the entire work, the consistent manner in which the task has been carried out, the technical skill, excellent judgment and broad learning everywhere displayed, as well as the very considerable addition to our knowledge involved, disarms adverse criticism and invites only praise. Would that sucha Maecenas and such an author might oftener company together ! The work is published in quarto in sumptuous style, is unexceptionable in typography and profusely illustrated. Besides 46 plates of some of the best chromo-lithographs of butterflies which we have ever seen, there are 129 wood cuts scattered through the text generally illustrating special structural features, especially in neuration and leg structure, which are of the greatest value. The author, as would have been expected of one of our best lepidopterists, familiar with the structure as well as the early stages, the form and colouring of butterflies, has followed closely in the lines of classification made prominent in recent years by Bates, in which the Hesperide are immediately preceded by their 4 (EN.) 50 eee —ooooOoOoOowomomomonanaoOoOoOoOoOoOoaomnmDoOowmooDoDoDomomooeee oe ee-ewoeO nearest allies, the Papilionide. It remains only to say that a good deal of interesting: reading will be found scattered through the portly volume, and that there are points in. the preface worthy of careful attention. About 500 species are described. The Ottawa Naturalist. Vol. i, Nos. 1 and 2, April and May, 1887. A welcome addition to our few Canadian serials on Natural Science; we heartily wish it abundant success. A Revision of the Lepidopterous Family Saturniide. By John B. Smith. Proceedings of the United States National Museum. Washington, Dec.. 1886. A very valuable illustrated paper on this interesting family of moths. North American Lepidoptera: The Hawk Moths of North America, by A. Radcliffe Grote, A.M. Printed by Homeyer and Meyer, Bremen, 1886. The above is the title of an interesting brochure by our old friend Prof. Grote, who has done so much to advance our knowledge of the North American moths. The press work is superb. For clearness of print, nice paper, and excellent taste in the selection of contrasting type for the heading of the sections, this work is a model. After a graceful dedication to Prof. William Saunders, former editor of the Canadian Entomologist, our author gives directions for collecting and preserving insects, followed by a chapter on the relation and habits of the Sphingide. He then takes up their classi- cation, beginning with the sub-family Macroglossine. under which he includes the genera Hemaris, Lepisesia, Thyreus, Enyo and Deidamia. Then follow the sub-family Chero- campine, including the genera Lveryx, Ampelophaga, Deilonche, Deilephila and Phil- ampelus ; the sub-family Smerinthine, including the genera Calasymbolus, .Paonias, Cressonia and Triptogon ; and the sub-family Sphingine, including Ceratomia, Daremma, Diludia, Dolba, Phlegethontius, Atreus, Ellema, Sphinx and Dilophonota. Prof. Grote divides the time of the work on our lepidoptera into three periods: The first including that of Abbot, Boisduval, the elder LeConte, Say, Peck, Harris, Gosse, Kirtland, and their historian, Dr. J. G. Morris. The second period, the one which he calls the ‘‘ Renascence,” is the period in which the American Lepidopterists catalogue the different families of the lepidoptera and thus lay the foundation for present and future discoveries. This period, which came to an end with the appearance of Grote’s New . Oheck List, “ was a time during which a great deal of work was performed with good humor and at considerable. self-sacrifice,” and no one did his sbare of this work, which was more or less drudgery, more cheerfully than did Mr. Grote himself. The author says that the writings of our entomologists have a flavouring of the localities from which they emanate, thus, “‘in some way the scent of the Maine woods has got into Prof. Fernald’s writings,” and we may say in return that a vein of poetry runs all through this charming little work which we are now reviewing. OBITUARY. Since the last Annual Report appeared, our Society has sustained a serious loss by the death of one of its most prominent and highly esteemed members, Mr. George J. Bowles, of Montreal, for a great many years a member of the Society. He was also for the greater part of the time on the Executive Council, and did valuable work, not only in ee 51 writing for our publications, but also in fostering and disseminating as widely as possible a love for Entomology. He began to study this branch of science when quite a young man, in the neighbourhood of Quebec. Since that time he has kept quietly on persistently collecting, working, and helping others right up to the day of his death. After his re- - moval to Montreal he took a very active part in the preliminary arrangements and insti- tution of the Montreal Branch of our Society, of which he was for several years the President, and before which he read some valuable papers, many of which have appeared in the Annual Reports or in the Canadian Entomologist. His large collection contained specimens of all the different orders of insects ; but he made a specialty of the Lepidoptera, which were well represented by long series of Cana- dian and Exotic species. It is highly satisfactory to hear that this collection has been transferred to the museum of McGill University, where the good work of instruction by its means will continue to be carried on with even greater facilities than were possessed by the one who built it up with so much care. Mr. Bowles was a native of Quebec, in which city he was born in 1837. He was a kind and religious man, and always had a helping hand for those who knew less than himself. His quiet, modest manner made him a favourite with all his associates, while his ability as a naturalist was acknowledged by all who came into contact with him. He leaves a wife and three children, for whom, in their bereavement, our deepest sympathy is called forth. ENTOMOLOGIST FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA. It is with much pleasure that we have just learnt of the appointment of the Rev. George W. Taylor, of Victoria, Vancouver Island, B. C., as Honorary Provincial Ento- mologist of British Columbia. Mr. Taylor has been an active member of our Society for some years, and has done much good work, not only in Entomology, but in general Natural History, by working up the little known but exceedingly interesting fauna of Vancouver Island. He is one of the best Conchologists in the Dominion, and has the finest collection of British Columbian shells extant. His knowledge of Ornithology and Botany will materially enhance the value of his work as Provincial Entomologist, and his appointment cannot but result in great benefit to the farming community of the Province. We tender our sincere congratulations, not only to Mr. Taylor, but also to the Minister of Agricul- ture and the Provincial Legislature, for the wisdom that has been displayed in the choice of an incumbent for this important office. There are many “first-class pests” which require attention in our Pacific province already, and doubtless, now the Canadian Pacific Railroad is completed, many others from the east may be expected to be introduced by that means, and it is only by having the services of a trained scientific student at their dispasal, to identify the marauders, and give information concerning the habits and best means of remedying their attacks, that the farmers can hope to protect themselves against the injuries yearly inflicted by insects. REMEDIES FOR NOXIOUS INSECTS. BY REY. C. J. 8S. BETHUNE, PORT HOPE. In our Annual Report for last year (pages 55-64) I began an account of the remedies that have been found by practical experience the most useful in counteracting the ravages of destructive insects, and, taking them in alphabetical order, described those employed against our chief foes, as far down as the ‘“‘codling worm.” ‘The next insect on our list is 52 . THE CoLorapDo Potato BEETLE. This formidable pest of the potato-gréwer is now far too well known to require any description. The accompanying wood-cut (Fig. 6) illustrates the insect in all its stages : a the eggs; b the orange coloured larva or grub at different periods of growth; c the chrysalis or pupa ; d the perfect beetle ; e one wing cover enlarged ; f a leg magnified. Though this destructive pest is now widespread over all the eastern half of this conti- nent, wherever potatoes can be grown, and appears in infinite numbers everywhere, it can yet be kept in check without much trouble or expense. As almost everybody knows, Paris green is a perfect remedy for it, and by its timely use almost the whole of the crop can be saved. The main point is to apply the poison carefully and promptiy as soon as the first brood of the insect appears in the spring; by so doing the chances of a second attack are very much diminished, but careful watch must be kept throughout the season and the poison applied whenever any of the insects appear. If all the farmers throughout the country would unite in using this remedy, we should in a few years so nearly exter- minate the insect as to have little trouble from it. The most satisfactory mode of using the poison, if the Paris green is pure, is to mix one teaspoonful in a pailful of water and carefully sprinkle the affected parts with it; an ordinary watering-can will be found most convenient. As, however, the poison is often adulterated, it may be found necessary to use two or even three spoonfuls instead of one; by trying the smaller quantity first and watching its effect, the proper proportion may be readily ascertained. In the case of the fully developed beetles a poison of much greater strength is required than for the more delicate grubs. An objection to the use of Paris green has often been raised on the ground that it injures the potato tuber and renders it a dangerous article of food by the absorption of arsenic. Very careful and exhaustive experiments have been made in order to ascertain whether any of the poison gets into the tubers or the roots and stems of the plant, with the result that in no instance could any trace of the arsenic be found. The foliage to which it is applied is often damaged to some extent by the corrosive action of the poison, especially when too strong a mixture is used, but none of it is actually taken into the plant so as to be stored up in the tuber. Any of the arsenic that reaches the ground is speedily neutralized by the oxide of iron in the soil. Of course, in using this or any other virulent poison, care must be taken to keep it out of the reach of children, and to avoid using it in a garden where children play, or in a field to which cattle have access. In such exceptional cases the insect may be kept in check by the more laborious method of hand-picking. 53 The following extract from an agricultural paper will shew what pains are taken in Germany to prevent the spread of this noxious insect :— “In the December number of Agricultwral Science is a translation from the Berlin Official Gazette of an account of how the introduction of the Colorado potato beetle into Germany is prevented. The beetle was first discovered on a potato field in the locality of Latitzch. As soon as its appearance was positively settled, an examination was first made of all the fields the beetle could possible have visited. Then for a distance of six miles about the place, placards with coloured illustrations of the insect were distributed among the people to put them on their guard. Eight smaller potato fields were thus discovered to be affected. All these grounds were then strictly quarantined. The potato stalks were most carefully searched for eggs, larvee and beetles. Next the soil about the roots and stems was examined, and afterwards the tops were cut off and collected in linen-lined baskets. These were placed in pits four feet deep, in layers four inches thick, and saturated with raw benzine oil, destroying the plants ; on top of these were placed other layers until a height of twenty inches was reached, then earth was placed on them. The infested fields were ploughed nearly a foot deep, experienced laborers followed the ploughs, collecting any larve, chrysalids, or beetles turned up. Then the land was har- rowed once, being gone over again by laborers for insects. After the search was ended the fields were thoroughly saturated with raw benzine oil, 165 lbs. being used to 47 square feet. The fields were shut up and no one allowed to go on them. Next year no crops will be grown here, but the fields will be again examined.” THE CURCULIO OF THE PLUM. The fruit-grower in this Province has no more for- & midable enemy to contend against than the Plum Curculio (Conotrachelus nenuphar, Herbst.), the different stages of which are shewn in the accompanying wood-cut : @ repre- sents the grub much magnified ; 6 the chrysalis, and c the beetle, both magnified; d the young fruit, shewing the crescent-shaped mark made by the insect, and the curculio, life size, at its work. Until very recently the only remedies employed against this insect were laborious in their application and uncertain in their results ; such, for instance, as jarring the tree and catching the falling insects in sheets spread beneath ; trapping them under boards or other articles beneath the trees ; planting in poultry yards, etc. Now, happily, a remedy has been - discovered, comparatively easy of application, inexpensive, and almost certain in its good results—I refer to the plan of spraying the trees with a weak mixture of Paris green at the time the females are laying theireggs. Three-quarters of an ounce by weight of Paris green mixed with two and a half gallons of water has been found very satisfactory. The liquid must be sprayed all over the trees with a hand force-pump and applied in a fine mist-like spray till the leaves begin to drip. It has been found of advantage to mix a certain amount of flour with the Paris green in order to render the fluid more adhesive to the frnit. Three quarts of flour to a barrel (40 gallons) of water was found to be a satisfactory quantity. The time of application is just after the blossoms fall and when the fruit is of the size shewn in the wood-cut above. If applied before the blossoms are matured, the stigma of the pistil of the flower may be injured by the poison and the fruit prevented from formation. Another evil result is that the honey bees affecting the blossoms may all be poisoned, a fatality that has actually happened when apple trees. were sprayed in a similar manner for the prevention of the codling moth. If, on the other hand, the application is delayed too long, the female beetles will have laid their eggs and the young curculios will be out of reach inside the plum. Since the preparation of our last Report, Professor Forbes, State Entomologist of Hlinois, has published an account of his experiments with arsenical poisons for the destruction of the codling moth of the apple. His results may be mentioned here as the Hie: 7: 54 mode of application and the general treatment are the same for the plum curculio as for the apple worm. He states at the outset that “to this codling moth we may fairly attribute a loss to the farmers of Illinois of, say, four and three-quarters millions of dollars each year.” He then proceeds to shew, as the result of his experiments, that— putting down the loss to one-half of the amount stated—‘“at least seven-tenths of that loss may be prevented by a single remedial measure,” viz., the application of Paris green, as mentioned above. After giving an account of his experiments, Prof. Forbes states that they show “that eighty-six per cent. of the apples which would have fallen from codling moth injuries have been preserved from falling, and that fifty-nine per cent. of the picked apples, which would have become wormy, remain uninjured ; or, taking all the apples from these trees together and comparing with the entire crop of the check trees (which had not been sprayed) we shall find that, of the apples thus exposed to damage, almost exactly seventy per cent. have been saved by our treatment.” This is certainly eminently satisfactory. Experiments were also made as to the effect of spraying the trees once, twice or three times, with this result : “The benefit to the picked fruit apparent from a single spraying, stands at forty-seven per cent., and that from twice spraying at ninety per cent., while that from thrice spraying falls away again to seventy-seven per cent. Or, summarizing still more briefly, we may say, in general, that the results of once or twice spraying with Paris green in early spring, before the young apples had drooped upon their stems, resulted in a saving of about seventy-five per cent. of the apples exposed to injury by the codling moth.” It is most important to bear in mind that, in the case of apple trees especially, the spraying must be done before the apples have begun to hang downward ; if deferred till a later period there is positive danger that some of the poison will be retained on the fruit and held in the cavity where neither wind nor rain can dislodge it. Enough poison from careless treatment may thus be retained in the apples to be dangerous to the health, if not to the life of the consumer. The use of this mode of prevention for the plum curculio has, we are glad to find, been already tried in Ontario. Prof. Saunders, in his speech at the meeting of the Entomo- logical Society at Ottawa in October, stated that he had in this way saved his own fruit, and that the remedy had been found effective at Owen Sound and Goderich also. There is no doubt that the method of spraying with Paris green will be found advantageous when applied for the destruction of the codling moth and plum curculio, at the same time reducing very much the ravages of insects that devour the foliage of these fruit trees, especially the tent caterpillars of the apple and many other destructive worms. CurRANT Borers. There are two species of insects that prove injurious to the currant by boring into the stems and rendering them hollow and weak, and in many cases causing their death. Though similar in their operations, the two insects are utterly unlike, one being a moth and the other a beetle. The moth is commonly called the Imported Currant-borer, (igeria tipuliformis, Linn) as, like so many others serious insect pests, it has come to us from Europe. Fig. 8 represents the moth, a pretty wasp- like creature, with a bluish-black body, crossed by three narrow golden bands ; on the thorax and at the base of the wings there are also streaks of the same colour. The wings are transparent, with veins and a bordering of brownish-black with a coppery lustre. The female lays her eggs in June, singly, near the buds, where, in a few days, they hatch into tiny caterpillars and eat their way into the centre of the stem. Here they burrow up and down through the pith until they have formed a cavity of several inches in length. When fully grown the larva changes into a chrysalis (Fig. 9 represents both caterpillar and chrysalis, much magnified), from which the moth issues in the following June. Fie. 8. : 55 — This insect affects both the white and red currant, and to some extent the goose- berry also. Its presence may be known by the sickly appearance of the foliage and the poorness of the fruit. The remedy for it is simply to cut offand burn all the affected stems either in the autumn or early spring, before the final transformation into a moth. The other borer, the larva of a beetle, is a native insect, and is therefore commonly called the American Currant-borer (Psenocerus swpernotatus, Say). Fig. 10 represents the beetle magnified to show the markings and in outline of the natural size. The larva or grub may be distin- guished from that of the preceding insects by its smaller size and want of feet. Its habits are much the same, as it feeds upon the pith and burrows up and down through the stalk, but it is more destructive than the larva of the moth from its gregarious life. Usually a number of the grubs, sometimes as many as eight or ten, Fic, 10. are found in the same stem, and speedily cause its death. The only remedy seems to be, as in the former case, to cut off and burn all the infested stalks. CurRRANT WoprMs. A number of worms feed upon the leaves of the currant and gooseberry, but only two of them are so commonly destructive as to require notice here. The first and greatest enemy of the gardener in the cultivation of these fruits is the imported Currant Saw-fly (Nematus ventricosus, Klug). This insect has come to us from Europe, and was first observed in America in 1858, since which time it has spread over a large part of the continent. Fig. 11 represents (a) the male, and (4) the female Saw- flies ; the hair-lines at the side shew the natural sizes. The body of the male is black above, with a few dull yellow spots, and beneath yellowish, with bright yellow legs. The female is larger and is especially distinguished by its honey-yellow body. It is well that gardeners should become familiar with these insects in their perfect state, as oftentimes they may be captured on the bushes and readily killed. The worms are much more familiar to every fruit-grower. They resemble the caterpillars of butter- flies and moths very much, but differ from them in having feet under the middle segments of the body and many more in number, and also in their habit of curling the terminal segments. When first hatched they are very small, of a whitish colour, with a large head, having a dark round spot on each side of it. They are then gregarious, feeding in companies of thirty or forty on a leaf till they have consumed all the softer parts of it and left nothing but the frame-work remaining. They soon increase in size, being voracious feeders, and gradually scatter all over the bush. Their colour changes with their growth after successive moults, first becoming apple-green, then green with many black dots, and finally plain green, tinged with yellow at each end. The chrysalis is formed within a tough silken cocoon, nearly oval in shape and brownish in colour, and is made among dry leaves or rubbish on the ground, or in the earth a little way beneath the surface. The fly soon emerges and thus there are several broods during the season, necessitating continual watchfulness on the part of the gardener. The most effective and simplest remedy is to be found in the application of powdered hellebore mixed with water, in the proportion of an onnce to a pailful, and showered freely over the foliage with a watering-can. If thoroughly applied, especially to the leaves about the bottom and in the middle of the bush, most of the worms will be found 56 dead in a few hours. Constant inspection of the bushes is, however, required in order to apply the remedy at once whenever a new brood makes its appearance ; a few days t neglect will often result in the complete stripping of the foliage of the bush. Another mode of counteracting the attacks of these worms is hand-picking. This can be done most effectively before the eggs are hatched, as they are deposited along the -ribs on the under side of the leaves, as shewn in Fig. 12. By turn- ing over the lower leaves of the bush the lines of white eggs can readily be seen, or the presence of holes eaten through the leaf, as shown in the same wood-cut. If the leaves, with the eggs or young larve, are gathered and destroyed at this stage, before the worms have grown larger and scat- tered over the foliage, an immense deal of damage may be easily averted. Hie. 12. The other great pest of the currant and gooseberry is the Currant Span-worm (Eujitchia ribearia, Fitch), a well-known and often very destructive insect. In the caterpillar state it can be at once distinguished from the worms of the Saw-fly by its paler and more yellow colour, and by its habit of arching its body into a loop when moving from place to place. The accompanying wood-cut (Fig. 13) attitudes, and illustrates its mode of suspend- ing itself by a silken thread when disturbed or alarmed. When full grown the ‘caterpillar is about an inch long, of a whitish colour, with stripes of yellow running lengthwise and a number of black dots on each segment. It isa native insect and attacks the wild currant and gooseberry bushes in the woods as well as the cultivated varieties in gardens; it is also especially partial to the spicy-scented Flowering Currant, which is so frequently grown in gardens for the sake of its pretty fragrant blossoms. It generally occurs in large num- bers, and if let alone will soon make sad work of the foliage of any bush it attacks, but fortunately there is only one brood in the year, and it is in consequence by no means so s great a pest as the Saw-fly. The moth, Fig. 14, is a pretty pale yellow creature, with its wings adorned with several dusky bands or spots, which vary very much in different specimens. It usually appears about the end of June, and may be seen in numbers flitting about the affected bushes in the daytime. It is a wise precaution to catch and destroy as many as possible before they have time to deposit their eggs for the next year’s crop of caterpillars. It is unfortunate that powdered Hellebore, which is so simple and effective a remedy for the Saw-fly worms, is not Fic. 14. sufficiently powerful for the certain destruction of these hardier creatures. If it is used, it must be made of twice or thrice the usual strength. Paris Fic. 13. the young worms may be discovered by the little represents the caterpillar in this and other — 57 green would, of course, be effective, but it is too dangerous a remedy to employ in a garden, especially as these worms do not make their appearance till the fruit is well- formed. The only method, apparently, that can be recommended, is hand picking ; this is not very difficult, as by shaking the bush the worms will let themselves down by their silken threads, and can then be easily seen and gathered. Cut Worms. These noxious creatures, the caterpillars of various night-flying moths, are but too well known to gardeners everywhere, from their annoying habit of cutting off young - cabbage and other plants when first set out in the beds. They usually attack the young and tender plants when they are only a few inches high, completely severing the stem just above or below the surface of the ground. They are by no means particular as to the kind of plant, but will destroy spring wheat, Indian corn, any kind of young vegetable, tender annual, or even weed. Some species also have the further evil propensity of climbing trees at night and doing great damage to the expanding foliage and fruit blossoms. The number of different species of Cut-worms is very large, but the accompanying illustrations will enable any one to recognize some of the commonest forms in both the caterpillar and winged states, Fig. 15 represents the Greasy Cut-worm, so-called from the appearance of the caterpillar; the moth, (Agrotis ypsilon, Rott,) into which it trans- forms, is shewn beneath it. This is one of the commonest of all our species, and has apparently several broods in the year, as the moths can be taken by “sugaring” during the summer and quite late in the autumn. Fic. 16. The other illustration, Fig. 16, represents the caterpillar and moth of the Dark- sided Cut-worm (Agrotis Cochranii, Riley). This species is notorious for its nocturnal habit of climbing apple and other fruit-trees and destroying the buds and young leaves. Many methods have been tried for the destruction of these pests, but owing to their nocturnal habits it is very difficult to cope with them successfully. Whenever a young plant is noticed to have suddenly withered and died, the culprit may, in almost every case, be found within a few inches of the plant and just below the surface of the ground. It is unnecessary to add that when found he should be ruthlessly crushed under foot. Sprinkling the plants with air-slaked lime, ashes, or powdered hellebore is recommended. When setting out young tomato or cabbage plants, they may be protected by wrapping round the stem of each a piece of paper, extending a few inches up the plant and a little way down into the ground. Where the buds and leaves of fruit-trees and vines are found to be destroyed without apparent cause, search should be made in the ground at the base of the tree, or under any rubbish lying near, and the enemy will generally be found. : The following remedy is quoted by Dr. Lintner, from a correspondent, in his Second Annual Report, and is worth trying :—“‘One year ago I had a patch of beans entirely destroyed by cut-worms. I planted it over ; as soon as they came up the worms began again. I dissolved half a pound of saltpetre in three pints of water, mixed that thoroughly 58 with one-half bushel of dry ashes, and sprinkled the ashes on the beans just as there was a shower coming on; the rain washed the ashes all off into the ground, and I had no more trouble with the worms, but had a good crop of beans.” Professor Riley (First Missouri Report) says :—‘ From the orchard planted upon light warm soils, the climbing cut-worms can be driven away entirely by claying the ground about the trees; a wheelbarrow full is well-nigh enough for each tree when spread around its base and as far as the limbs extend. This is the most thorough and lasting remedy.” . THe Fatt WeEsB-WorM. This very destructive insect (Hyphantria cunea, Drury ; textor Harris), is a familiar nuisance all over Canada and the northern and middle States. Last autumn Professor Saunders observed it defoliating trees in British Columbia; and last year (1886), it became so serious a plague in Washington, D.C., that the attention of the public authorities was drawn to it, and the Entomological Commission was called upon to devise a remedy for its attacks. Professor Riley states in his report (page 521) that: ‘“‘the city of Wash- ington, as well as its vicinity, was entirely overrun by the caterpillars, with the exception of trees and plants the foliage of which was not agreeable to the taste of this insect; all vegetation suffered greatly. The fine rows of shade trees which grace all the streets and avenues appeared leafless and covered with throngs of hairy worms. Excepting on the very tall trees, in which the highest branches shewed a few leaves, too high for the caterpillars to reach, not a vestige of foliage could be seen. The trees were not alone bare, but were still more disfigured by old and new webs made by the caterpillars, in which bits of leaves and leaf-stems, as well as the dried frass, had collected, producing a very unpleasant sight. The pavements were also covered with this unsightly frass and the empty skins of the various moults the caterpillars had to undergo were drifted about with every wind and collected in masses in corners and tree boxes. As long as the cater- pillars were young and still small, the different communities remained under cover of their webs and only offended the eye ; but as soon as they reached maturity and commenced to scatter, prompted by the desire to find suitable places to spin their cocoons and trans- form to pup, matters became more unpleasant, and complaints were heard from all those who had to pass such infested trees. In many localities no one could walk without step- ping upon caterpillars ; they dropped upon everyone and everything ; they entered flower and vegetable gardens, porches and verandas and the house itself, and became, in fact, a general nuisance.” The above extracts are given in order to show what a plague this insect may become, and to warn our readers how serious an injury it may cause to an orchard or garden if no effort is made to keep it in check. The large unsightly webs made by this insect are no doubt familiar to everyone ; they are especially noticeable on ash and wild-cherry trees, but may often be found on fruit trees as well, They may be distinguished from the webs of the tent caterpillar by their later appearance in the year in this country (in the south there is a spring brood as well), and by their enveloping two or three feet of the extremity of a branch, instead of being constructed in the fork of a limb. The accom- panying illustration, Fig. 17, represents the caterpillar, chrysalis and perfect insect. The moth is a pretty little white creature ; it flies only at night, and is consequently not often observed. It appears’ about the end of May, .or early in June, and lays its eggs on the under side of leaves near the ends of branches ; from these the caterpillars come out from June io August, according to the locality. The winter is spent in the chrysalis state. } The simplest and generally the most effective remedy is to cut off the portion of the bough covered by the web and to destroy by burning or treading under foot the enclosed 59 family of caterpillars. This should be done as soon as the webs are noticed, not only for the sake of preventing further damage, but also because the worms, when nearly full- grown desert the web and scatter over the surrounding foliage. It is well also to kill the caterpillars as quickly as possible after cutting down the web, for they are very lively creatures and will make their escape in numbers if not speedily attended to. If the web should be in such a position that it cannot be conveniently cut off, or should involve the sacrifice of a limb that cannot be spared, it may be destroyed with its contents by burning. This can easily be accomplished by means of rags soaked with coal oil or tar and fastened to the end of a long pole. As a.substitute for the rags, a piece of porous brick has been strongly recommended. Professor Riley quotes the following mode of making a brick- torch: “Take a piece of soft brick (one from the outside of a kiln would probably answer best) trim it to an egg shape, then take two soft wires, cross them over this brick, wrap- ing them together around the opposite side so as to firmly secure it, now tie this end to a long stick such as the boys get at the planing-mills, by wrapping around it, then soak the brick in coal oil, light it with a match, and you are armed with the best and cheapest weapon known to science. Holding this brick torch under the nests of caterpillars will precipitate to the ground all the worms on one or two trees at least from one soaking of the brick, and it can be repeated as often as necessary. Then use a broom to roll them under it, and the work will be done, the controversy ended and the trees saved.” Other remedies may be resorted to, such as spraying the trees with Paris green, as recommended for the codling moth and plum curculio, but this would not be satisfactory unless the damage was very serious and the caterpillars had been left too long undisturbed and had grown to maturity. Pruning or burning, or both, are the simplest, easiest, most effective and least dangerous remedies. To these may be added the further precaution of gathering up and burning all fallen leaves, weeds and rubbish that may be found around the base of a tree that has been badly infested. This should be done late in the autumn in order to destroy as many as possible of the chrysalids, that would otherwise remain over winter and produce the moths for a fresh attack the following year. The list of common noxious insects has by no means been exhausted, there are many more “first-class pests” which are only too well known to our farmers and gardeners, These we must now reserve for a future occasion, but we believe that the many remedies already given in the reports for last year and this will supply methods of treatment that may be employed in numbers of other cases. The main point is to know enough of the life-history and habits of the enemy to understand what remedy toselect and especially when to apply it. In most cases, success entirely depends upon attacking the insect foe at the right moment ; a few days’ delay may involve the loss of the crop, and render the application of the remedy a mere waste of labour. Most people have not the time or the inclination to study these creatures, and therefore it is that we, who are especially devoted to this investigation, believe that we are doing good service to the farmers and gardeners of our country, and therefore to the whole community, by spreading amongst them some knowledge of the appearance and life and habits of these most pernicious and destructive beings. A SKETCH OF CANADIAN ORTHOPTERA. BY F. B. CAULFIELD, MONTREAL, P.Q. The destructive insects commonly known as grasshoppers or locusts, with the crickets, -eockroaches, walking sticks and earwigs, belong to the order called Orthoptera or straight winged insects. The insects composing this order, unlike the beetle or butterfly, pass through their transformations by a series of simple moultings, moving about and eating from the time they leave the egg until the close of their existence, the principal difference sbetween the larva and adult insect being that of size, and, in the greater number 60 of species, the presence of wings. Both old and young are voracious eaters, having the mouth parts highly developed, the mandibles being fitted for both cutting and grinding. From the beginning of summer until late in the fall our gardens and pastures swarm with crickets and locusts, and the amount of grass, leaves, flowers, etc., eaten by these ever hungry little creatures must be very considerable, and is especially noticeable during dry and hot seasons. The Orthoptera have long been celebrated for the musical powers with which many species are endowed. The poets have sung to the “ love songs of the grasshoppers,” but in reality these merry little fellows are instrumentalists, not vocalists, as they, like all other insects, breathe through spiracles and are of course voiceless. So far as I am aware the musical power is confined to the crickets, grasshoppers and locusts, the remaining families being silent. In reality the song of an orthopterous insect is a sexual call and is almost entirely confined to the males—entirely so in the crickets, some species of which go through quite an elaborate performance, as may be easily seen by watching the common striped cricket (Nemobius vittatus). When a male of this species wishes to attract the notice of the female, he advances towards her, and, raising the wings and wing-covers, rasps them together, thereby pro- ducing a shrill, creaking sound, now and again jerking himself forward with a convulsive movement, touching the female with his antenne, at times dancing around in a frantic manner. Should the female be pleased with his attentions, she turns around and, seizing him, draws him beneath her, when copulation takes place. Should his serenade prove unsuccessful, the Jittle minstrel either stops shrilling or turns his attention to another female. I have not observed the courtship of our other species, but it is probably much the same in all. Mr. W. H. Harrington, speaking of @eanthus niveus, says: ‘‘ An interesting feature of its concerts is one of which I have not been able to find any mention in books accessible. While the male is energetically shuffling together his wings, raised almost vertically, the female may be seen standing just behind him, and with her head applied to the base of the wings, evidently eager to get the full benefit of every note produced.” The courtship of Zctobia Germanica is very similar to that of Nemobius, but is unaccompanied by any sound, nor are the wings shuffled together. The male follows the female until her attention is attracted, when, turning around and raising the wings until they form a right angle with the body, he backs up to and is seized by the female. I have only seen actual copulation take place in Wemobius, but have little doubt that in both Blattide and Gryllide the male never takes possession of the female by force. Another remarkable feature of the Orthoptera is the facility with which they elude ob- servation. This is largely owing to the similarity of their colours to the surroundings amidst which they live, and probably serves as a means of defence against their enemies. No doubt many observers have noticed that it is easy to see a grasshopper or locust when it is jumping or flying, but it is just the reverse when the creature remains quiet. A familiar example is the large rattling locust, whose gaily coloured under-wings make it so- conspicuous an object when hovering in the air, but which becomes almost invisible when resting with closed wings on the bare dry gravel or dusty roadside; and equally difficult to detect are those green species that live in damp meadows, or on shrubs and trees, their colour just matching the grass and leaves amongst which their lives are spent. Six families of Orthoptera are represented in Canada, viz.: Gryllide, Crickets ; Locustide, Grasshoppers ; Acrididze, Locusts; Phasmide, Spectres or Walking Sticks ; Blattidz, Cockroaches ; and Forficulide, Earwigs. Dr. Harris, in his well-known work on Injurious Insects, says: ‘ Cockroaches are: general feeders, and nothing comes amiss to them, whether of vegetable or animal nature, but by far the greater part of the Orthopterous insects subsist on vegetable food, grass, flowers, fruits, the leaves and even the bark of trees; whence it follows, in connection with their considerable size, their great voracity, and the immense troops or swarms in which they too often appear, that they are capable of doing great injury to vegetation.” 61 Famity 1.—GRryYLiipz (CRICKETs). ; The Crickets are robust, thickset insects with a large head and thorax. The antenne ; are long and very slender. The wings are laid flat on the body, the outer edge of the front pair being bent down so as to slightly overlap the body. The hindmost thighs are thick and muscular, enabling them to jump quickly and to considerable distances, which perhaps gave birth to the saying, “as lively as a cricket.” The ovipositor is long and spear-shaped, and slightly curved upwards. Packard says that “the shrilling of the male is a sexual call, made by raising the fore wings and rubbing them on the hind wings. The noise is due to the peculiar structure of the fore wings, the middle portion of which forms, by its transparent elastic surface, on which there are but few veinlets, a resonant drum, increasing the volume of sound emitted by the rubbing of the file on the upper . surface of the hind pair of wings. This file is the modified internal vein, the surface of which is greatly thickened, rounded and covered closely with fine teeth. In the females the wings are not thus modified, and they are silent.” The Mole-crickets (Gryllotalpe) may be recognized by their powerful fore-feet, which somewhat resemble those of a mole, being short, stout and flattened and armed with tooth-lixe projections. They inhabit soft and moist earth in which they drive burrows resembling miniature mole runs. According to Packard, their eggs, from 300 to 400 in number, are laid in the spring in tough sacks in galleries. Only one species, Gryllotalpa borealis, Burm., is recorded from Canada, where it appears to be very rare. “ Mole-crickets avoid the light of day, and are active chiefly during the night. They live on the tender roots of plants, and in Europe, where they infest moist gardens and meadows, they often do great injury by burrowing under the turf and cutting off the roots of the grass, and by undermining and destroying, in this way, sometimes whole beds of cabbages, beans and flowers.”—(Harris.) Should our American species become sufficiently numerous to be injurious, they might perhaps be poisoned by scattering grated vegetables sprinkled with Paris green in the vicinity of their burrows. The large black cricket so common in dry fields during the summer months is the Gryllus neglectus, Scud. ; specimens in the larval condition may be found under stones as soon as the snow has melted in spring, and on warm sunny days may be observed running through the scanty herbage, making off with hasty jumps when alarmed. By the end of May most of them have attained the perfect condition, but some individuals are later, as I have taken a specimen in the pupa state on June 4th, 1885. . I have not been able to determine whether these hybernated specimens live until the end of the season, or deposit eggs during early summer and then die, but so far as ; I have observed, their shrilling almost entirely ceases during July. In the beginning of ; August a few may be heard, and by the middle of the month they are again in full chorus, appearing to be more numerous than in the earlier part of the season. Harris says, “The old insects, for the most part, die on the approach of cold weather ; but a few survive the winter by sheltering themselves under stones, or in holes secure from the access of water.” This may perhaps be the case in Massachusetts, where, I believe, Dr. _ Harris observed them ; my own experience is that they hybernate as larve, that is, about _ half grown and without wings. About the end of August, and during September, the _ field crickets lay their eggs. At this time they leave their hiding places and may be __ seen in great numbers in the fields, particularly on dry hill sides, where the herbage is short and scanty. When about to deposit her eggs, the female walks slowly along, __ stopping at intervals and feeling the ground with her ovipositor ; when a suitable spot is found, she raises her abdomen, inclining the ovipositor downwards until its point touches the earth, into which, by steady and continued pressure, it is gradually forced until completely buried, when the eggs are deposited. Beside our native species of Gryllus, we have the well-known house cricket, Gryllus domesticus, which, like its cousins the cockroaches, has crossed the ocean. Se Eee a ST This species loves warm quarters, making its home in kitchens and bakehouses _ feeding on crumbs and scraps, not being particular as to diet. During the day it hides » 62 in chinks and crevices, coming out at night in search of food. It is of a greyish-white colour. marked with spots and lines of brown. The small black crickets, so plentiful in meadows and pastures, belong to the genus: Nemobius. They may be distinguished from the species of Gryllus by their smaller size, duller colours, and by the thorax or neck, being slightly hairy. These little crickets do not burrow in the earth like the larger kinds, although an occasional specimen may be found under stones or clods of earth. They are of social habits, keeping together in large troops or swarms. The striped cricket, Nemobius vittatus, Harris, is our most abundant species ; its colour is greyish-brown, marked with lines of black. _ Another species of about the same size, but with long wings, may occasionally be found ; this is the little long-winged cricket, Wemobius fasciatus, DeGeer. It closely resembles the striped cricket, but the wings are about twice the length of the body. It flies well, and sometimes enters houses in the evening, attracted by the light. ‘“ Where crickets abound, they do great injury to vegetation, eating the most tender parts of plants, and even devouring roots and fruits whenever they can get them. Melons, squashes, and even potatoes, are often eaten by them, and the quantity of grass that they destroy must be great, from the immense numbers of these insects which are sometimes seen in our meadows and fields.” —( Harris.) Domestic fowls and turkeys will eat crickets and locusts whenever they can get them, and would considerably lessen their numbers if let run in the fields after the crop has been harvested. The broad-winged hawk (Buteo Pennsylvanicua) also feeds largely upon them in the fall, as I have on several occasions found them in their crops, one individual having its crop literally crammed with specimens of the common field cricket, (Gryllus neglectus.) Crickets might be easily killed by simply crushing them under foot in the fall, as at . this time they congregate in numbers in exposed situations for the purpose of depositing their eggs ; they might also be caught with nets by children and destroyed. All the foregoing species live on the ground, but we have another kind of cricket which spends its life among the leaves and branches of tall weeds and shrubs. It is the ivory climbing cricket, Heanthus niveus, Serv. The male is ivory white, with very broad, transparent wing-covers, crossed by from three to five oblique raised lines. In the female the wing-covers are longer and narrower, and of a pale green colour. The antenne and legs are long and slender, the insect not being so stoutly built as the ground crickets. The shrilling of this species is more sustained than that of Gryllus, the notes running together like the roll of a drum, swelling and decreasing alternately. They commence shrilling about the first of August, and continue until the frosts of October put an end to their existence. This is a very troublesome insect to the fruit grower, attacking the peach, plum and other trees, being particularly injurious to the grape and raspberry. When about to deposit her eggs, the female settles herself on a grape stem or raspberry cane, and pierces it with her ovipositor, laying a long, narrow, yellow egg in the opening thus made, repeating the operation until from four to fifteen have been deposited. The cane thus attacked often withers above the punctured part, or is so much weakened as to be easily broken off by the wind or by the weight of the leaves in spring, the result in either case being the loss of the fruit. Late in fall or early in spring search should be made for the punctured canes, which should be cut away and burned. The insects themselves may be killed by jarring them from the plants and crushing them under foot. Fences and waste-corners should be kept clean and free from wild vines and briars, such places being prolific breeding grounds of this and various other insect pests- Famity 2.—Locustip&, (GRASSHOPPERS. ) The term Grasshopper is now generally restricted to certain orthopterous insects with very long, slender legs and antennz, mostly of a grass or leaf-green colour. In the winged species the wing-covers slope downwards at the sides of the body and overlap a little on the back near the thorax. The ovipositor is generally long and curved like a 63 cimeter. With few exceptions, grasshoppers are solitary insects, nor are they often sufficiently numerous to be injurious or attract attention. At the head of the family systematists place a group of wingless forms represented in Canada by two species—one restricted to the North-west, the other apparently common in Ontario and Quebec. The latter is the spotted, wingless grasshopper of Harris, Ceuthophilus maculatus. This curious insect lives in small communities under stones in damp woods and beneath the loose bark of dead trees. It is rather strongly built, with stout hind thighs ; its general colour is brown, thickly mottled with spots of a lighter colour ; the back is arched, and the crea- ture has a smooth, shiny appearance as if varnished. It is entirely wingless, ovipositor rather long and nearly straight. Lt appears to be somewhat carnivorous, as I have taken it in cans baited with meat. The western insect is Udeopsylla nigra, Scud. It resembles in form the preceding species, but is heavier and stouter ; the ovipositor is rather short, and thick at the base. Colour, shining black. The next group contains the typical insects of the family, the green grasshoppers or ° katydids. Most of these possess ample wings and can fly well. Some species live on trees and shrubs, while others inhabit meadows and pastures. They are pretty and harmless creatures, not being numerous enough to be injurious ; and owing to their retiring habits and the similarity of their colour to the leaves and grasses amidst which they live, are but seldom noticed even in the localities where they are most abundant. “The shbrilling of these insects is produced by friction of the large veins situated nearly on the inner margin of a talc-like plate at the base of the wing-covers. When the insect shrills, the wing-covers are raised and the bases shuffled together.”—-Riley. The shrilling of some of the southern species is quite powerful, and where the insects are very abundant the noise is sometimes unpleasantly loud; but in these northern regions the notes of our grasshopper are weak, nor are the insects sufficiently numerous to attract much attention. Our green grasshoppers may be divided into two groups, one containing the species that live on trees and shrubs, (the true Katydids) the other those species that live on the- ground or in tufts of rank herbage (the meadow grasshoppers.) Our commonest arboreal species is the narrow-winged Katydid, Phaneroptera curvi- cauda, De Geer. It may often be observed resting on shrubs and young trees during the latter part of summer, occasionally taking a short flight from tree to tree. It may be recognized by its narrow and straight wing-covers, and by the male having a cylindrical style curving from below upwards, and resting in the forks of a furcate appendage which projects from the end of the abdomen. ‘The ovipositor of the female is rather short and curved abruptly upwards, the extremity being toothed on both sides. The female deposits her eggs in the edges of leaves, as discovered by Miss Murtfeldt. Prof. Riley describes the note of this species as a soft zeep, zeep, sometimes uttered singly, but generally thrice in succession. While, passing through its earlier stages this species wears a more varied dress than the simple green of the adult msect. In the larve the colours are purplish-black and white, arranged in minute squares on the head and body, the antenne and legs being _ marked with rings of the same colours. The pupa is green, varied with purple on the sides, and adorned with a double row of crimson spots on the dorsal surface. The mature insect is wholly green. It may be found during August and September. The Oblong-winged Katydid, Phylloptera (Amblyconypha) oblongifolia, De Geer, is green like the preceding species, but may be distinguished from it by its larger size, and by the oval form of its wing-covers. It appears to be rare in Canada. I have not seen _any account of the earlier stages of this insect, but in the latter end of June, 1885, I found two larve which, I think, probably belonged to this species, as they were entirely pale green ; and on August Ist, 1885, I found two pup, also green (cwrvicauda is marked with purple and white when immature), and I know of no other arboreal species in eastern Canada. The Broad-winged Katydid, Platyphyllum concavum, Harr, may be distinguished from our other species “‘ by the greater length and convexity of the wing-covers, which \ 64 entirely enclose the abdomen, and with their strong midrib, look exceedingly like a leaf” Riley. This is the true “ Katy-did,” the name being derived from a fancied resemblance of the call of the male to the words, Katydid. ‘* T sit among the leaves here, when evening zephyrs sigh, And those that listen to my voice I love to mystify ; I never tell them all I know, altho’ I’m often bid, I laugh at curiosity, and chirrup ‘ Katy did.’” Prof. Riley states that ‘the stridulation is quite forcible, representing more often ‘ Katy-she-did’ than ‘ Katy-did,’ and continued at regular intervals.” Rare in Canada, and apparently confined to south-western Ontario. These are the only aboreal species on our Canadian lists, and so far as known to me, . they live altogether on trees and shrubs, never coming to the ground except by accident. Prof. Riley aptly remarks that “‘they might more appropriately be called tree-vaulters than grasshoppers.” In Conocephalus the head is conical, and extends to a point between the eyes, and the ovipositor is long and straight. C. ensiger, Harr, is the only species recorded from Canada. It is of a pale green colour, the head whitish, the abdomen and legs brownish green. It measures from an inch and three-quarters to two inches in length. The female has been observed by Prof. S. 1. Smith, with its ovipositor forced down between the root-leaves and the stalk of a species of Andropogon, where the eggs are probably deposited. During the latter part of summer, numbers of small, fragile looking green grass- hoppers may be found in damp fields. They belong to the genus Xiphidiwm, of which we have two species in Canada, one of which, X. fasciatum, is common and generally dis- tributed ; the other, X. saltans, appears to be rare, and is apparently confined to the North-west. The species resemble each other very closely, their general colour being green, with a brown stripe on top of the head, and the thorax bordered on each side with darker brown. The ovipositor bends abruptly down at the base, and is then straight to the tip. Prof. Riley states that X. fasciatum oviposits in the cone-like willow gall (Salicis strobiloides). Although X. fasciatum and its variety, brevipennis, are abundant at Mon- treal, I have not heard them shrilling; according to Mr. Scudder, ‘‘ Xiphidiuwm makes a note very similar to Orchelimum, but so faint as to be barely perceptible even when close at hand.” The species of Orchelimum are almost identical with Xiphidwwm in general appear- ance and colour, but are larger, measuring about an inch and one-tenth in length from head to tip of wing-covers. They also differ somewhat in habits, according to my obser- vations, Xiphidiwm being generally distributed among the grass, while Orchelimwm con- ceals itself in the ranker tufts. Orchelimum agile, De Geer, is common in the neighbour- hood of Montreal, and may be found in almost every damp field where there are tufts of rank grass or clumps of tall weeds. Concealed in one of these the male takes his stand and trills his simple love song, which is merely a weak, wheezy tril, only audible for the distance of a few feet. When shrilling the insect slightly raises its wing-covers, and shuffles them together with a shivering motion. It shrills in the bright sunshine, and it was by observing the play of light on the wings while in motion that I discovered the insect, as when sitting still it is almost impossible to detect it, so effectually does its green dress conceal it. The species of Anabrus, commonly called western crickets, are large, thick-bodied, clumsy looking insects, the wings being very small and quite useless for the purpose of flight. As the popular name implies, they are found in the west, where at times they occur in immense numbers, often proving very injurious. A. purpurascens, Uhler, is the only species on our Oanadian lists. It is of a dark purplish-brown colour, mottled with yellow. F. 4 : § * eggs, forces a hole in the ground by 65 Famity 3.—Acripip&, (Locusts.) This family contains the most destructive insects of the order ; indeed I may say, the most destructive of all insects, the terrible migratory locusts. Both the old and new worlds have time and again been scourged by their countless millions, well named by the eastern poet, “‘The army of the Great God.” The desolation caused by their ravages has been the theme of poets and historians since the days of Pharoah’s humiliation, when ‘‘ they covered the face of the whole earth so that the land was darkened.” The noise made by the beating of their wings during flight has been compared to the rushing of a mighty wind, the roar of distant thunder, the crackling sound of burning stubble, etc., and is thus described by the poet Southey :— ‘* Onward they came, a dark continuous cloud Of congregated myriads numberless, The rushing of whose wings was as the sound Of a broad river headlong in its course Plunged from a mountain summit, or the roar Of a wild ocean in the autumn storm Shattering its billows on a shore of rocks.” The Acridide, or Locusts, (Fig. 18) may be distinguished from the grasshoppers by the antenne being short, not exceeding the body in length, and by the number of joints in the feet, the locusts having only three, ~~ the grasshoppers four. The wing- covers are generally long and narrow and slope downwards on the sides like a roof. The under wings are broadly tri- angular, and when at rest are folded in plaits like a fan. In. stead of a long exserted ovi- Fie. 18. positor like the grasshoppers and crickets, the female locust is provided with four wedge-like pieces, placed in pairs above and below, and opening and shutting opposite to each other. When about to deposit her eggs the female forces these wedges into the earth, these being opened and withdrawn enlarge the opening ; the operation being repeated until a hole is formed large and deep enough to admit nearly the whole of the body. Prof. Riley thus describes the manner in which the Rocky Mountain locust (Caloptenus spretus) deposits her eggs. (Fig. 19 represents the different positions.) “The female, when about to lay her means of the two pairs of horny valves which open and shut at the tip of her abdomen, and which, from their peculiar structure, are admirably fitted for the purpose. With the valves closed she pushes the tips in the ground, and by a series of muscular efforts and the con- tinued opening and shutting of the valves, she drills a hole until, in a few minutes (the time varying with the nature of the soil) the whole abdomen is buried, the tips reaching an inch or more below the surface by means of great distention. Now, with hind legs hoisted straight above the back and the shanks hugging more or less closely the thighs, she commences ovipositing, the eggs being voided in a pale, glistening and glutinous fluid which holds them together and binds them into a long, cylindrical pod, covered with particles of earth which adhere 5 (EN.) Fic. 19. 66 to it. When fresh the whole mass is soft and moist, but it soon acquires a firmer con- sistency. It is often as long as the abdomen, and usually lies in a curved or slanting position. The eggs which compose this mass are laid side by side to the number of from 30 to 100 according to the size of the mass.” Prof. Thomas states that he has obtained the eggs of Caloptenus femur-rubrum in rotten wood in which they were placed without any apparent regularity and without being connected by any glutinous secretion. The sounds made by locusts are produced in two ways, first by rasping the hind thighs up and down on the wing-covers, and second by snapping together the edges of the w ngs and wing-covers during flight. Our Canadian locusts fall into two sub-families, deridine and Tettigine. To the first belong all those species in which the pronotum (upper surface of thorax) extends only to the base of the wing-covers. This group contains the greater number of our species. . To the second belongs a small group of species in which the wing-covers are aborted, appearing as small pads, while the pronotum extends as far as, or past, the extremity of the abdomen. As regards the time of appearance of our locusts, there is a succession of species from early spring until the fall. As soon as the snow has disappeared from the sunny slopes and grassy banks, several kinds of little locusts may be observed. These are the Grouse- locusts (Tettiv and Tettigidea). They are compactly formed, the body being broadest. between the middle pair of legs, tapering gradually to a point behind, the head is very small and the legs are rather short. As already stated, the wing-covers are merely little scales, the wings being folded beneath the extended thorax. The species are all small, measuring about half an inch in length. They pass through their transformations during the latter part of summer and fall, hybernating in the imag) or perfect state. About the end of May and during the month of June a species of locust may often be observed flying with a rustling sound. This is 7’ragocephala infuscata, Harr. There are two forms or varieties. The typical infuscata being dusky brown, the wing-covers faintly spotted with brown, wings transparent, pale greenish-yellow next the body, with a large dusky cloud near the hind margin, and a black line near the front margin ; length about three-quarters of an inch. The variety viridt-fasciata is almost wholly green and is slightly larger ; it has been described as a distinct species, but as it occurs in the same localities and at the same season it is probably merely a variety of the same species. They hybernate as larve, changing to pup early in spring, attaining the perfect state about the end of May and disappearing early in July. Dr. Harris states that they “are sometimes very troublesome in gardens, living upon the leaves of vegetables and flowers, and attacking the buds and half-expanded petals.” As infuscata dies out, its place is filled by swarms of Camnula pellucida, a small locust very abundant in dry pastures during midsummer. General colour ash-brown, face reddish brown, a datk spot behind the eye and just touching it, and another on the side of thorax, wing-covers brown, marked with yellow lines and dark spots, wings colourless, with biack veins. The female measures about an inch in length, the male a little less. The flight of this species is noiseless, extending about thirty or forty feet. During August and September the fields fairly swarm with locusts, prominent among them being the large species that fly with a crackling or snapping noise. Many of these insects have considerable command of themselves while on the wing, being able to change the direction of their flight at will. The wings are generally brightly colored, reminding us of the lepidopterous genus Catocala. (dipoda verruculata is ash-brown varied with dusky brown, wings yellow at base with a black band. (dipoda sordida flies with a rustling noise exactly like the species of T’ragocephala- It is dusky brown, head and thorax varied with patches of lighter and darker shades, wing-covers dark brown with two light bands on the middle portion. Wings pale greenish yellow on the inner half, remainder smoky brown. MJdipoda carolina is our largest. species, the female measuring from 1.5 to 1.75 inches. It is of a dull ash-brown colour, sprinkled with small dusky spots, wings deep black, except the margin, which is pale. yellow. ‘Vhen alarmed it flies with a muffled, rustling noise. Gdipoda phenicoptera is light brown, spotted with dark brown on the win¢-covers, wings coral red with a dusky border. This is a vernal species, flying with a loud, snap- ping noise as soon as the snow is off the ground. Our most abundant and troublesome species in the older Provinces is the common red-legged locust, Calop- tenus femur-rubrum, (Pig. 20), which, during some years, multiplies to such an extent as to seriously injure the hay and other crops. The Entomologist to the Department of Agriculture in Fra. 20. his report for 1885 quotes Mr. J. Scriver, M.P., as fol- lows :—“ Grasshoppers were numerous and very destructive in certain localities. In the month of August our pastures were swarming with them, and they afterwards attacked the oats also. They did much injury by biting off the separate flowers just as they came out of the sheath, sometimes destroying the whole panicle. Their ravages were most severe in the townships of Hemmingford and Havelock, and particularly in the parish of Lacolle, where one farmer had to cut down his oats and use them for fodder. The species referred to was the common red-legged locust, Caloptenus femur-rubrum.” During 1885 locusts were very numerous all through the country, and several milk- men told me that they had seriously injured their pastures. At Lachine I observed that in many places the shrubs and young trees growing by the fences were almost stripped of leaves by them, presenting a ragged appearance. The species that I found up in the shrubs were the red-legged locust, Caloptenus femur-rubrum, and the yellow striped locust, Caloptenus femoratus. The latter is a large, clumsy-looking species, easily recognized by having two yellow stripes running from the head to the end of the wing-covers. It is a common species and very troublesome in gardens. The destructive Rocky Mountain locust, Caloptenus spretus, Uhler, (Fig. 21), is almost identical with our commonest red-legged species, but has longer wings, and in the male the end of the abdomen is turned up like the prow of a ship. For a full account of this species, the reader is referred to the Rev. C. J. 8. Bethune’s valuable paper in the Society's Reports for 1874-75. By the middle of October nearly all our locusts have disappeared, but a few specimens of Caloptenus and Stenobothrus linger until the autumnal frosts put an end to their existence. The ravages of our common locusts might be greatly lessened by beating them with bundles of brush, and thus driving them into hollows or against fences. When thus congregated, they could be killed by beating them with shovels or by gathering into sacks and boiling down for hogs. The best time for this work would be the end of June and beginning of July, as at this time our most injurious kinds have not acquired wings, moreover, they are now mostly in the pastures and can be destroyed without injuring the standing crops. Dr. Harris states that in the south of France ‘‘ the locusts are taken by means of a piece of stout cloth, carried by four persons, two of whom draw it rapidly along, so that the edge may sweep over the surface of the soil, and the two others hold up the cloth behind at an angle of forty-five degrees. This contrivance seems to operate somewhat like a horse-rake, in gathering the insects into windrows or heaps, from which they are speedily transferred to large sacks.” Famity 4.—PuHasmip®, (WALKING-STICKS oR SPECTRES). This family is represented in Canada by only one species; the well-known Walking- stick insect, Diapheromera femoratum, Say. This curious creature is entirely wingless, and looks very like a small twig. It lives almost altogether on trees, on the leaves of which it feeds, being found most frequently on oak and basswood. According to Packard, the egg-sac is flattened, elliptical, with a lid in front which can be pushed open by the embryo when about to hatch, and is deposited in the autumn. With us it is seldom numerous, but some few years ago it 63 increased enormously in parts of New Jersey, New York and Maine, stripping acres of trees, leaving them as bare as in midwinter, and congregating in heaps by the fences; showing that what is usually a scarce and harmless insect may, under favourable condi- tions, increase to such an extent as to be seriously injurious. FamIty 5, BuaTTIDZ, (COCKROACHES). Cockroaches are flattened, ovate insects, generally of a dull brown colour, and have an oily and disagreeable smell. They run swiftly, but do not jump like the crickets and locusts. The eggs are laid in a bean-shaped capsule, divided into two compartments, each containing a row of separate chambers, each of which encloses an egg. Some days are required for oviposition, and the female may be seen running about with the egg-case partially protruding from the body. The egg-case is dropped at random, the female not depositing or concealing it in any particular place or manner. Cockroaches are omnivorous insects, feeding on almost everything eatable, whether animal or vegetable, some species being great pests in houses. The kinds found in our dwellings have been carried here in shipping, and are now common in almost every part of the world. The large black species so familiar to housewives, under the name of “ The Black Beetle,” is the Blatta (Stylophyga) orientalis, Linn. As the name implies, it is an eastern species, brought to us by commerce. During summer it sometimes takes up temporary quarters in the open air, as I once found a flourishing colony under some stones in a lane in the rear of a bakehouse. The other important species is the small reddish-brown cockroach, Hctobia Germanica, commonly known in the New England States as the “Croton Bug.” It infests houses, and is even more troublesome than the large species, making itself at home in wooden partitions and cracks in furniture, soon becoming unpleasantly numerous. It is not so strictly nocturnal in its habits as the large species, and may often be seen on a voyage of discovery in broad daylight. Our native species live under stones and beneath the loose bark of dead trees, and appear to be rare insects. FamiLy 6,—ForricuLip&, (Earwics). Earwigs may be distinguished from all other Orthoptera, by their narrow, flattened body and short wing covers, and by the extremity of the abdomen being furnished with a forceps, which in some species equals the body in length. This instrument appears to be used for several purposes. Westwood says “ they are ‘weapons of offence and defence.” De Geer states ‘that they are used during sexual inter- course.” The Rev. J. G. Wood says “the membranous wings of the earwig are truly beautiful. They are thin and delicate to a degree, very large and rounded, and during the day-time packed in the most admirable manner under the little square elytra. The . process of packing is very beautiful, being greatly assisted by the forceps on the tail, which are directed by the creature with wonderful precision, and used as deftly as if they were fingers and directed by eyes.” Dr. John G. Morris’s experience does not agree with the Rev. Mr. Wood’s account. He says, ‘last summer I had a good opportunity of observing the habits of this insect, for every night numbers of them came into my study window in the country, and lighted very conveniently upon the table at which I was writing. Each one of them, before he took flight, for they were active, would bend his body back and lift up the short elytra with his forceps before the wings would expand, and this they did invariably. The forceps were not used to fold the semi-circular wings, but only to elevate the wing-covers before 4 in: ot e ‘These accounts may perhaps be reconciled upon the assumption that the forceps is not used for the same purpose by every species. The smaller species of Staphylinide, for which a small earwig would be easily mistaken while on the wing, may very often be 69 observed tucking in their wings with the aid of the long flexible abdomen, but I do not remember ever seeing the larger species doing so. The female earwig is remarkable for the care with which she watches over her eggs and young, sitting upon them like a brooding hen, a fact vouched for by Kirby and other eminent entomologists. — During the day, earwigs generally hide in holes and crevices, often concealing them- selves among the petals of flowers, the long spur of the nasturtium being a favourite place of refuge. A few of the smallar species are active during the day, flying about in the sunshine. Earwigs feed on vegetable matter, and in Europe, where they are numer- ous, often do much damage by eating the blossoms of carnations, dahlias, etc. In this country they appear to be rare insects, only one species being recorded from Canada, the Labia minor of Linnzus, common to both Europe and America. So far as known to me, none of the Orthoptera occurring in Oanada are ddéhble- brooded, with perhaps the exception of Gryllus, and of course, those species which infest houses. Of Grylius, some individuals at least, go through their transformations in spring, appearing as larve in April, and being in full song by.the end of May. The species of Tragocephala, which go through their transformations at the same time, are all dead by the end of July, and during this month the crickets if not dead are nearly, if not altogether silent, but in August appear again, and in much greater numbers, while Tragocephala is not seen until the return of spring. With regard to the species found in houses, winter is unknown to them, the result being a constant succession of broods, which accounts for the short time required for stocking a kitchen with cockroaches. PRELIMINARY LIST OF CANADIAN ORTHOPTERA. GRYLLID2. Gryllotalpa borealis, Burm.—Very rare. A pair taken in Essex Oounty, Ont.— Brodie. Gryllus luctuosus, Serv.—Rare. Two females in August; Montreal.—Caulfield. Gryllus neglectus, Scudder.—Province of Quebec, very common—Provancher ; Mon- treal, abundant—Oaulfield ; Toronto, very abundant—Brodie. Gryllus domesticus, Oliv.—Quebec, common — Provancher; Montreal, common— Caulfield ; Ottawa, rare—Fletcher ; Toronto, rare—Brodie. Nemobius vittatus, Harris.—Quebec, common — Provancher ; Montreal, common— Caulfield ; Ottawa—Fletcher ; Toronto, common— Brodie. Nemobius fasciatus, De Geer.—Quebec, Provancher ; Montreal, not common—Caul- field ; Ottawa—Fletcher ; Toronto—Brodie. Nemobius (Anexipha) septentrionalis, Scudder.—Quebec, one specimen—Provancher; Rat Portage— Brodie. Gcanthus niveus, Serv.—West Farnham, P.Q.—Provancher ; St. Hyacinthe, P.Q.— Provancher ; Montreal, abundant—Caulfield ; Ottawa—Harrington ; Toronto—Brodie ; London—Saunders. Ent. Reports. LocusTID2. Ceuthophilus maculatus, Harris.—Anticosti— Verrill ; Quebec, common—Provancher; Montreal, common—Caulfield ; Ottawa, common—Fletcher ; Ontario, generally to north of Lake Superior—Brodie. ; Udeopsylla nigra, Scudder.—Common in Manitoba—Scudder and Brodie. Phaneroptera curvicauda, De Geer.—Province of Quebec, common in August and September—Provancher ; Montreal, common—Caulfield ; Ottawa, common—Fletcher ; Toronto, common in Ontario generally, to north of Lake Superior—Brodie ; Red River 70 Settlements—Scudder ; a male, Rosseau River, August 30th, and a female in the vicinity of Souris River—G. M. Dawson. Phylloptera (Amblycorypha) oblongifolia, De Geer. — Montreal, rare — Caulfield ; Ottawa, common—Fletcher ; Toronto, common, and Ontario generally, to north of Lake Superior—Brodie ; Regina, N.W.T., one specimen—Fletcher. Platyphyllum concavum, Harris.—London, taken at electric light—W. E. Saunders, Conocephalus ensiger, Harris.—Toronto, common—Brodie ; London—L. Reed. Xiphidium fasciatum, De Geer.—Province of Quebec, common—Provancher ; Mon- treal, common—Caulfield ; Ottawa, very common — Fletcher ; Toronto, common, and Ontario generally, to north of Lake Superior—Brodie ; Var. brevipennis—Scudder, com- mon in same localities. Wiphidium saltans, Scudder.—Souris River—G. M. Dawson. Orchelimum vulgare, Harris.—Toronto, common ; Ontario everywhere—Brodie, Orchelimum agile, De Geer.—Montreal, common—Oaulfield ; Ottawa, rather uncom- mon—Fletcher ; Toronto—common; Ontario generally, to north of Lake Superior— Brodie. Anabrus purpurascens, Uhl.—Common on the prairies around Regina—Fletcher ; West Butte, July 29th ; in the vicinity of Woody Mountain, between June 15 and July 7th, and in the neighbourhood of Souris River—G. M. Dawson. ACRIDID. Chloéaltis conspersa, Harris.—Rat Portage, Man.—Brodie ; eastern shore of Lake Winnipeg, five specimens—Scudder ; Nepigon—Fletcher. Chioéaltis (Amblytropidia) subhyalina, Scudder.—Province of Quebec—Provancher. Stenobothrus curtipennis, Harris—Quebec—Provancher ; Montreal, common—Caul- field ; Ottawa—Harrington ; Ontario generally, to north of Lake Superior.—Brodie. Stenobothrus propinguans, Scudder.—Oap Rouge, Quebec—Provancher. Arcyptera lineata, Scudder.—Province of Quebec—Provancher. Gomphocerus brunneus, Thomas.—Regina, August 12th, 1887—Fletcher. Gomphocerus clepsydra, Scudder.—Souris River—G. M. Dawson. Tragocephala infuscata, Harris.—Quebec, common—Provancher ; Montreal, common —Caulfied ; Ottawa, uncommon—Fletcher ; Ontario, generally to north of Lake Superior — Brodie. Tragocephala Var. viridifasciata, Harr.—Same distribution, Arphia sulphurea, Fabr.—Quebec, very rare—Provancher ; Ottawa, common— Fletcher ; Toronto, common, and Ontario generally, on sand hills—Brodie. Arphia tenebrosa, Scudder.—Sudbury, Ont., Regina and Nepigon—Fletcher ; Souris —G. M. Dawson. Arphia sanguinaria ?—Regina, August —Fletcher. Arphia frigida, Scudder.—Taken near Wood End in June—G. M. Dawson. Arphia trifasciata, Say.— Wood End in June—G. M. Dawson. Spharagemon collaris, Scudder.—Regina, abundant, August, 1886—Fietcher. Spharagemon equalis, Say.—Red River settlements—Scudder. Trimerotropis verruculata, Kirby.—Quebec, common—Provancher ; Montreal, com- mon—Caulfield ; Ottawa—F letcher, Encoptolophus sordidus, Burm.—Quebec, very common—Provancher ; Montreal, common—Caulfield. Dissosteira carolina, Linn.—Quebec—Provancher ; Montreal, common; Ontario, generally to Lake Superior—Brodie ; Vancouver Island—Packard. Hippiscus phenicoptera, Germ.—Quebec, common—Provancher ; Mentreal, rare— Caulfield ; Toronto, rare—Brodie ; Nepigon, common, July 7th, 1887—Fletcher ; Dufferin, June 13th and 14th—G. M. Dawson. Camnula pellucida, Seudder.—Province of Quebec—Provancher ; Montreal, com- mon—Caulfield ; Regina, Fletcher. | Camnula atrox, Seudder.—Regina, August—Fletcher ; Victoria, Vancouver Island —Packard. (Surely a variety of the preceding, ) Pezotettix borealis, Scudder.—A single pair, vicinity ot Lake of the Woods—G. M. Dawson. Pezotettix Dawsonii, Scudder.—Souris River—G. M. Dawson. Pezotettia septentrionalis, Sauss.—Labrador—Saussure. Melanoplus repletus, Walk.—Vancouver Island—Walk. Melanoplus scriptus, Walk—Vancouver Island—Walk. Melanoplus bilituratus, Walk.—Souris River—G. M. Dawson ; Vancouver Island— Walk. Melanoplus femur-rubrum, Burm.—Quebec—Provancher ; Montreal, common—Caul- field ; Ottawa—Harrington ; Ontario, generally to north of Lake Superior—Brodie. Melanoplus atlantis, Riley. —Quebec—Provancher ; Ottawa—Fletcher. Melanoplus spretus, Uhler.—Dufferin, Souris River, vicinity of the Lake of the Woods, and the east fork of Milk River—G. M. Dawson. Melanoplus parvus, Prov.—Oap Rouge, @uebec—Provancher. Nelanoplus femoratus, Burm.—Quebec—Provancher ; Montreal—Caulfield ; Ontario, every where—Brodie ; Lake of the Woods—G. M. Dawson ; Regina—Fletcher, Melanoplus Packardii.—Regina, one specimen—F letcher. Melanoplus infantilis—Regina—F letcher. Melanoplus extremus, Walk.—Arctic America— Walk. Melanoplus fasciatus, Walk.—St. Martin’s Falls, Albany River, Hudson Bay— Walker. Melanoplus arcticus, Walk.—Arctic America—Walk. Melanoplus borealis, Feiber.—Labrador—Feiber. Acridium appendiculum, Uhler.—Quebec—Provancher. Tettix granulata, “Kirby.—Quebec—Provancher; Montreal, common—Caulfield ; Ottawa—Harrington ; Ontario, generally to Lake Superior—Brodie ; Arctic America— Kirby ; Vancouver Island—Packard. m Sage ornata, Say.—Quebec, common—Provancher ; Ontario generally, rare— rodie Tettia cucullata, Scudder.—Toronto, common ; Ontario per orully: rare—Brodie. Tettia triangularis, Scudder.—Quebec, rare—Provancher ; Montreal, rare—Caulfield ; Ottawa—Harrington ; Ontario, generally to Lake Superior—Brodie. Tettix rugosa, Scudder.—Sudbury, Ont.—Fletcher. Tettigidea lateralis, Say.—Quebec—Provancher ; Montreal—Caulfield ; Ottawa— Harrington ; Ontario, generally to Lake Superior—Brodie. Tettigidea polymorpha, Burm.—Common in same localities as preceding species. Tettigidea acadica, Scudder.—Lake of the Woods—G. M. Dawson. Batrachidea cristata, Harris.—Toronto, rare—Brodie. PHASMIDA. Diapheromera femoratum, Say.—Montreal, not uncommon—Caulfield ; Ottawa— Fletcher, Harrington ; rare in Hickory Woods; Kingston—Rodgers ; Ontario generally —Brodie ; Red River settlements—Scudder. BuAtTTip&. Stylophyga orientalis, Linn.—Quebec—Provancher ; Montreal, common—Caulfield ; Toronto—Brodie. Ectobia Germanica, Stephens.—Chaudiere curve, Quebec—Fyles ; Montreal, common —Oaulfield ; Toronto—Brodie. Ectobia lithophila, Harris.— Welland and westward—Brodie. Periplaneta Americana, Linn.—Essex County, Ont.—Brodie. i a OO EEE 72 r e Ischnoptera Pennsylvanica, De Geer.—Montreal, one specimen ; Abbotsford, P.Q., three specimens under bark of stumps—Caulfield. Temnopteryxmarginata. --Montreal, two specimens under bark of dead tree—Caul field. FORFICULID. Labia minor, Linn.—Cap Rouge and Port Neuf, three specimens—Provancher ; Montreal, one specimen at light—Caulfield ; Ottawa, one specimen—Harrington ; three specimens at light,—Fletcher. A CHAPTER ON THE STRUCTURE OF BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS. BY A. R. GROTE, A.M. The Lepidoptera, or Butterflies and Moths, form a natural suborder of six-footed insects (Insecta hexapoda), characterized by possessing (save in the case of a few species of moths in which the females are wingless or have the wings aborted), two pair of membranous wings, attached to the sides of the thorax and covered, usually completely, sometimes only partially with scales of various shapes, overlapping each other somewhat Fig. 22. like shingles on a roof. The body consists of chitinous or horny rings and is divided into three principal parts by deeper and wider sutures : head in which the rings have become fused, thorax and abdomen in which they are distinct, As we now find them the Lepidoptera fall into two principal divisions, the one the true butterflies (Rhopalocera), Fig. 22., which fly by day, the other, the moths (Heterocera), Fig. 23, which fly chiefly by night. In addition to the scaly wings, the two divisions or groups have several characteristics in common which divide them from other insects. In their younger stages they appear as caterpillars, Fig. 25, having three pair of true or jointed thoracic legs, and this seems to be invariable except in one or two genera of minute leaf-mining moths. In addition they have between 2 and 5 pair of fleshy abdominal or false feet, unjointed and discarded in the pupal and perfect stages. A few genera want these false feet and many have only two pair, so that in 73 crawling, they bend themselves in the shape -of a loop or arch in bringing the false and true feet together, (Fig. 26). The silk spin- ning caterpillars often aid their progression by letting themselves drop from one branch of a tree to another by means of a thread spun from the mouth. The body of the caterpillar consists of a head, three thoracic segments and nine abdominal. Except in a very few cases, they feed on plants and bite their food by means of two powerful mand- ibles or jaws, covering the opening of the mouth at the sides. The mouth is further protected above by two corneous pieces form- ing the upper lip which is used to hold the food fast. The substance forming the cover- ing of the head is hard and horny and often darker coloured than the rest of the body, which is usually quite or almost naked, though frequently covered more or less com- pletely with hair, and ornamented with e Fic. 25. wart-like tubercles, the hairs themselves being gathered into bunches of various lengths and colours, (Fig. 27). The caterpillars are most often of various shades of green and Fia. 27. brown, like the leaves on which they feed and the earth into which many enter to form the pupa; but not afew are grayish, like the bark of the trees upon which they often crawl, while their colouring is almost. always clearly protective and aids their concealment from their enemies, Not a few are internal feeders, living on the pith or wood, and these are maggoity in appearance, pale yellowish or flesh colour, with dark heads, thus resembling the larvee of beetles which inhabit similar localities, A few are called “Sack-bearers” from their living in a portable case made of silk and twigs and bits of leaves, (Fig. 28). The caterpillars of the Tineide frequently form mines on the leaves, eating out the green and fleshy part of the leaf and leay- ing the transparent pellicle as a protection. The pupa or chrysalis of butterflies and moths is quiescent, covered with a horny skin, with the segments variously impressed or provided ——S ———s 74 with spines, and allowing the parts of the perfect insect to be perceived. In some kinds Fic. 28. the abdomen is moveable and this character is oftenest seen in the moths, in which the chrysalis is mostly protected by a cocoon, (Fig. 29), of varying 5 shape, thickness and construction. In the butterflies the chrysalis is Fie. 30. usually naked, (Fig. 30a), and variously fastened to some object, either hanging from a little button of silk head downward, (Fig. 31), or with the addition of a girdle, (Fig. 30d), when the position is reversed, while sometimes the caterpillar enters on its transformation without protection of any kind (Fig. 32), except what is adventitious and accidental upon the surface of the ground. The Hawk Moths or Sphingide, generally penetrate the earth itself, transforming into the pupa in a cell formed simply by the movement of the body packing the clay together. The wood-borers form a cocoon with the aid of bits of the wood itself variously and curiously wedged to- gether. All these statements are made from my own observations. HiGwasl. Fie. 32. In the perfect state butterflies and moths agree in the coiled-up tongue, by means of which food is taken up in a liquid state by the insect. Many moths have the mouth eee e's Yeas oie = parts aborted, and consequently take no nourishment as perfect insects, their life being correspondingly brief. This spiral tongue consists of the elongated soldered maxille ; the mandibles or jaws of the larva becoming rudimentary in the perfect state. The sub-equal wings consist of a membrane traversed by a simple system of nerves or veins, the neuration, covered with scales and fringed with hair. The thorax has a distinct portion in front, the collar (collare). The atdomen usually tapers posteriorly, in some females it appears blunt, being provided with heavy tufts, the hairs from which are used sometimes as a nesting for the eggs. As caterpillars, the Lepidoptera usually feed and grow, whereas as butterflies and moths they occupy their brief lives chiefly in propagating their kind, the sexes being separate and the females laying eggs, singly or in patches or clusters, from which again caterpillars emerge. To this latter there are a few exceptions. In the case of some Spinners and the Tineid genus Solenobia, a parthenogetic race has been observed, the virgin females laying eggs which produce only females, no males being hatched, the complete species is only produced by a union of the sexes. What are called “ Herm- aphrodites” are also sometimes found, in which, in one and the same individual, the two sexes are variably united, one side being more or less completely male, the other female, This is seen occasionally in the larger spinners, Platysamia Cecropia and Callosamia Promethea, when the division is clearly marked by the sexual differences in the antennz and colour. Such specimens are abnormal productions and infertile, not true Herm- aphrodites as the snails normally are. Bastards, resulting from the union of two species, occur, and have been noticed, especially in the hawk moths, but I have never seen an undoubted exampie of this kind myself. By confining the perfect insects, bastards have been artificially produced; in nature they seem to occur rarely. New species are probably never formed in this way of unnatural selection. The three divisions of the lepidopterous body mark also a division of function. The head is provided with jointed appendages for the purpose of holding, biting and masti- eating the food, or sucking the same in the perfect state, and here the sense-organs, eyes, ocelli and antenne are situated. The three-ringed thorax supports three pairs of slender legs and the wings—the organs of locomotion. The nine-ringed abdomen contains the digestive and reproductive parts ; breathing or the aération of the blood is accomplished by stigmata opening on the sides of the body, chiefly the abdomen. In the butterflies those forms are highest in rank in which the front pair of legs are useless for walking, being apparently taken out of the locomotive series, curiously shortened and elevated, and seem like an additional pair of palpi or head organs. The interesting details of the anatomy of the head by my kind friend, Mr. Edward Burgess, should be known by students. For the essential characters separating the butterflies and moths, I refer more par- ticularly to a paper of mine read before the American Association for the Advancement of Science in August, 1873, the gist of which I here reproduce with fuller statements. There is first to be noted the differences in the structure of the antenne. These usually long, jointed, thread-like organs, situated on each side of the vertex, are quite uniform in shape throughout the butterflies, being more or less club-shaped or thickened at the tips. From this latter character the name Rhopalocera has been given to them by Dr. Boisduval. On the other hand, the moths have the antennz of quite various shapes and length, usually showing some sexual difference in structure. The postion of these organs in the two divisions exhibits a marked change. In the butterflies the antenne are comparatively rigid and straight, and are directed upwards and forwards. In the moths the antenne are flexibie and held horizontally, being not unfrequently deflexed along the sides of the body “in repose. The antennz are apparently less used by the butterflies, which depend more on their sight during their diurnal activity. That they are the organs of smell and are probably also sensitive to vibrations of the air, has been suggested by experiments. The feathered antennz of so many male moths seem to be sensitive to odours given out by the female. In this way the fact is accounted for, that male moths will come long distances to find unerringly specimens of the opposite sex. One needs only to expose a freshly- hatched female of our larger spinners, even in the heart of the city, to verify this state- ment. The moths, resting in the daytime, seem also to depend on their antenne to warn 76 them of the approach of danger, as they are sensitive when touched, and the jarring of the surface on which the moth rests is probably first communicated to the antenne, which lie parallel with the plane of repose. The wings are deflexed in the majority of the moths (Fig. 33) when in repose, and clapped together and held upright in the butterflies. In the Hesperide, the lowest butterflies, the front pair of wings are often alone elevated when the insect is sitting or walking, the hind pair being flatly extended asin many moths, particularly the Spanners. Certain moths sometimes elevate the wings when resting, as the larger Bombyces, and many Geometride do the same when walking. The butterflies want the frenulum, or bristle and hook, which con- nect the front and hind wings in the majority of moths, and hold them together when flying. As a whole, the nervures are stouter and the wings perhaps stronger in the butterflies. The hawk moths have the wings, however, very strongly built, narrow and with thick ribs; their flight is correspondingly rapid and extended. The body is more thinly scaled in the butterflies, becoming more hairy and tufted in the moths, in which the total vestiture is looser and longer, more downy and somewhat easier abraded. Inthe butterflies the scales are more complicated in structure and the wings themselves are, on the whole, more equal-sized and with shorter fringes. The legs of the moths are, as a rule, stronger, being often curiously armed and spined. Dr. Boisduval called the moths Heterocera, or diversely-horned, in contradistinction to the butterflies, and these terms probably signalize an important difference or degree in the use of the antenne in the two divisions of Lepidoptera. The writings of Mr. S. H. Scudder afford us some insight into the ancestry of exist- ing Lepidoptera. In particular, he has called attention to the fact that all the diverse patterns which adorn the wings have originated from shaded bands or lines which run parallel with the outer margin, and have become broken up into spots of such varied form as to make it strange that they should have come from so simple an element. (Fig. 34.) Fic. 33. Fic. 34. It is evident, however, that this is the correct view. I had previously shown that the ringed spots of the wing in the Noctuide originated from loopings of the usual transverse lines. There seems to be a correlation between the length of tongue in the Lepidoptera and the corolla of flowers. It is probable that the butterflies came in with the flowering plants and that they were preceded in point of time by moths which had short maxille and simply hairy, unscaled wings, unicolorous or faintly banded, and having their parentage in the ancient Neuroptera or dragonflies. These may have had aquatic larve and less complete transformations, active in the darkness ; living, indeed, at an epoch when the light of the sun was less potent at the surface of the earth than it is at the present day. ; A study of the head of the perfect moth shows that it is composed of several distinct chitinous pieces protecting the nervous ganglia, and covering the mouth parts which are only fitted to take in liquid food. At the base of the spiral tongue (sperilingua) are placed the jointed maxillary palpi, (Fig. 35) but these are often, perhaps usually obsolete; they are well developed in the snout moths or Pyralide, and especially in certain Zineidw. On the other hand all moths possess one pair of labial palpi, jointed appen- danges, analogous to the legs in ultimate structure and articulated to the lower lip or labium. The space between the eyes is called the front or clypeus, and this piece varies in comparative shape and size in the differ- ent families, and often affords peculiar structure offer- ing generic characters. In the genus Hudryas, for example, (Fig. 36) it is smooth, and in the related genus Copidryas it is provided with a clypeal horn. The compound eyes vary in shape and external appearance. They are sometimes constricted, as in certain Heliothid genera in the Owlet moths. Again the surface, usually naked, is covered with short hairs arising from the angles of the facets apparently, and only to be properly observed under the microscope. Behind the eyes the small ocelli, or simple eyes, are to be found ; these are never more than two in number, and are sometimes wanting, as in the genus Brephos. The antenna, or “‘ feelers,” are situated on the top of the head on each side, and spring out between the vertex and epicranium. The basal joint is often thickened and longer than the rest. Up to 100 joints have been counted in the antenne of some moths. They vary much in ultimate structure and exhibit sexual peculiarities, Fie. 35. Fic. 36. Fic, 37. being more prominent in the males, feathered, pectinated or ornamented with nodosities. The extremes in total length are apparently afforded by the genera Adela, where they are longest and Hepialus where they are shortest. They are broadest and most plumose in the genus Attacus (Fig. 37.) The average aspect of these organs in the moths may be 78 found in the Noctwide where they are bristled beneath, scaled above, and about two- thirds the length of the fore wings. The thorax supports the organs of locomotion, the legs and wings. The former are six in number and consist of five joints. They are attached to the thorax by the basal joint or cowa, and there is a small piece, the trochanter, between this and the femur, which is stouter than the following ¢ibia, the leg terminating in jointed toes or tarsi. The tabie are often armed with spines or prickles, while the fore pair terminate sometimes in claws at the sides. In addition the middle and hind legs bear a pair of spurs. When the thorax is denuded of its vestiture it is seen to consist of three principal divisions, pro- thorax, mesothorax and metathorax, of which the middle piece is the largest. The wings are four in number, and are attached usually in the moths by a bristle and hook ; the former is divided in the females and simple in the males, and is situated on the hind wings beneath near the upper edge of the wing ; the bristle fits into a sort of socket on the under surface of the fore wings near the base. This character is wanting in the but- terflies and in some moths, and seems to be an aid in keeping the wings together when flying. According to the system originally proposed by Dr. Herrich-Schaeffer, the ribs or nervures of the wing are numbered from one on, commencing on the inner margin of each wing. The marginal nervure is wanting, and the subcostal and median nervures form a median cell and branch out into secondary veinlets thrown on the costa and external margin. An accessory cell is sometimes formed beyond the median cell, but the median cell is often open, and there are, as a rule, no cross veins on the wing. The sub- median vein or nervure is usually simple. The interspaces between the nervures are also indicated in descriptions so that the markings may be more accurately located. ‘The fore wings are, according to this system, 9 to 12 veined, the number depending on the second- ary veins which afford generic characters. The hind wings are similar in structure to the fore wings. They also vary in the number of secondary veins, of which there are usually 7 to 8. These veins are in reality hollow rods through which, when the insect escapes from the chrysalis, air and blood are forced by an action of the muscles of the thorax. They finally become dry and rigid. The wings in insects are thus not analogous to the wings of birds ; they are outgrowths of the tracheal system and have only a common function with the wings of vertebrate animals. In order to study the neuration of Lepi- doptera the wing must be denuded of scales. This is most easily accomplished by a pro- cess invented by Mr. George Dimmock by which the coloring matter is removed from the scales. For this process the wing, previously moistened with ether to remove all fatty matter, is placed in a solution of chloride of lime. From this it may be transferred from time to time to a weak solution of acid to hasten the action of the lime water which, in a short time, decolorizes the scales, rendering them entirely transparent and allowing the course of the veins to be exactly made out. Wings prepared in this manner may be transferred to glass slides and mounted for the microscope. A study of the wings and external parts of the Lepidoptera leads to the conclusion that the genera are founded on comparative characters. Rarely does the presence of a peculiar structure of some of the organs give a strong character to the genus. The con- clusions, with regard to classification, to which I have arrived are, that the generic char- acters must be dealt with in principle as are those separating the individuals into species. The limits of the genera depend on the want of intermediate forms, the important point being that the combination of characters which constitute the genus shall be readily seiz- able by the student and verifiable. Nature seems to be concerned with the individual rather than with our divisions, which are to a certain extent arbitrary and matters of convenience for our better understanding of these organisms. Subordinate to structure in the moths are the pattern of ornamentation and color- ation. The former is of the most value in associating species, although the latter is very characteristic in the different groups. In the butterflies we see for instance that the Satyride, or Meadow Browns, are of a dusky gray or blackish brown color, shading to reddish or yeilow, while the wings are usually ornamented with eye-like spots. The Pieride are usually white, yellow or orange of various shades with black margin to the » ee 79 wings (Fig. 38 Pieris protodice, male ; Fig. 39, female) ; the Papilionide (Fig. 40) are also oftene:t black and yellow and adorned with stripes. (See Fig. 22.) The Hesperide Fie. 38. are dark yellow and brown, the brighter ground color broken into blotches. In the moths the spinners (Fig. 41) are usually of rich and bright reds and yellows, with trans- verse bands of darker shades ; while the Owlet moths (Fig. 42) are oftenest of obscure Fie. 40. tints, certain groups which frequent flowers being brighter colored. In fact the colours of butterflies and moths alike seem to be protective and also dependent on the environment of the species ; they have all gradually grown to be what they are to-day, from the total Fie. 41. effect of the environment upon the species, and interesting facts are being worked out. by naturalists from time to time all bearing upon the great question of the derivation and: descent of the Lepidoptera. The interaction of flowers and insects forms a fascinating chapter of modern science. ; au. , The habits of butterflies and moths can be best observed in a@ vivarium, their quick flight rendering them difficult objects for free observation, but their lives are so short and: — 80 simple that beyond the observations of their various attitudes and the way in which they lay their eggs and provide for their young there is not much to be saidabout them. The sun is the powerful motor for the butterflies, which, during very dark days or during an — eclipse, become sluggish and behave as at nightfall. The moths, per contra, are most active during cloudy nights, loving the darkness and avoiding the moonlight. The habits of the caterpillars are varied by the situation in which they are found. Well deserving of close study are the aquatic larve of Arzama, Sphida among the Noctwide and Hydro- campa among the Pyralids, the latter furnished with thread-like gills for water breathing. The enthusiasm with which entomology is pursued when we are young carries with it a success in our observations which is not counterbalanced by the experience that comes with time. Quant ’e bella giovinezza—Lured to be up at five in the morning to catch the moths in their first sleep in the dawn on tree trunks and palings before the birds had disturbed them, finding thus early many freshly disclosed rarities and being amply rewarded for my rising. Caterpillars are also easier found at dawn, before or soon after sunrise. Everything that is beautiful passes with youth, before we have learned to remember, and our experiences are all new and unblunted. The necessity of exercising our discriminative faculties makes the study of the habits and structure of these insects a useful one to the mind by enlarging its faculties and, if properly guided, helps one to a kindly philosophy and the enjoyment of unselfish pleasures. But entomology, like every other pursuit, is only the frame upon which our moral char- acter is extended and displayed. Most interesting is the study of Variation in the butterflies and moths. We have first to consider the seasonal varieties, where a difference in the different, spring, summer, broods is shown. Then the sexual varieties, peculiar to one sex, as in Hnnomos alniaria, where, according to Dr. Packard, we have two kinds of males, etc. Then dimorphic varieties, as for instance Hemaris uniformis, which is, on the authority of Mr. Hulst, apparently a constantly recurring form in both sexes of H. Thysbe. It is not always possible to decide of any two forms which is the variety and which the parent, or original form of the species. The practice of considering the first form that was described as the original form and the latter the variety, is too unscientific to merit consideration. We have then Aberrations, mostly individual in character, in which by suffusion of color, or substitution of one tint for another, also by a change from the normal markings, a departure from the usual form is signalized. The cause of variation is evidently complex. Edwards, Dorfmeister, Weismann, have all shown the influence of cold and temperature in producing varieties. Warmth and light, the geological formation, food-plants, in fact, all the physical environments are, in truth, the factors, but it is not always easy to say which is the determining force. While varieties are considered to be nascent species it is probable that this is only relatively true and that a species may produce, under certain conditions, a variety which has insufficient character to become a species. Light and heat are supposed to produce brighter colours. Natural selection fixes the specific character, hardening it into constancy. The butterflies are gaudier than the moths and most brilliant at the Tropics. The day-flying moths are higher colored, as a rule, than the strictly nocturnal species, which are.as dusky as the night during which they range. An objection to this is, that the circumstances under which the caterpillar exists can alone be determining upon the colours of the moth. It is thought that the food-plant influences colour, and that the pigments are made by the chemical] processes within the body itself. But the colours of the moth are also directly affected, as I have long shown. I am inclined to believe that the moths are a survival of the oldest form of the Lepidoptera. That their colours are inherited, and that formerly all the Lepidoptera were dusky and active in the night or when, during the whole twenty-four hours, the light was less powerful on the surface of the globe than it is now. The influence of the surroundings of a moth upon its color may be witnessed in the case of Hemileuca tricolor, a pallid, desert-inhabiting form of a black genus of Bombyces. This moth is, as I have shown, a true Hemileuca, differing only in colour from other species of the genus. I have alluded elsewhere to the method of variation by which the under surface of the wings in the moths which are concealed from the light are the least affected. The fact that the under surface of primaries often corresponds with upper 81 surface of secondaries, as if the pattern of one were photographed upon the other, is deserving of especial notice in this particular. All shadows are photographs which may deepen with time. é Among tropical butterflies Mimicry, as illustrated by Bates, Wallace, Fritz Miller, Darwin, plays an important part. The fact that certain shecies (Jtwna, Euplea) are protected by a peculiar smell from their natural enemies, seems to have induced a variation in other Lepidoptera not so protected, by which they approach in colour, pattern the protected species and are so preserved. But not only do the Lepidoptera mimic each other, but also other orders of insects and natural objects such as leaves and sticks, the bark of trees, etc. It may be assumed as a general principle that any variation in a direction which would protect the species would be preserved, although it is difficult to think out the steps in such a process. The fact that through- out nature form is conditioned by environment covers such general resemblances as caterpillars to stalks and butterflies to the leaves of plants. It is only when we take animals out of their usual surrounding that they afford contrasts and strike the eye. The resemblances of the Sesiide, or Clear Wings, to wasps has been often noted (Fig. 43). We have a species in our Fauna, Sciapteron simulans, in which this resemblance is carried to a startling extent. I was much struck by the way in which an Orthopterous insect, living on the leaves of garden Okra, which I observed near Savannah, copied the beetle Tetracha Virginica. A special enumeration of the cases of protective mimicry already well ascertained would alone fill a large volume. The mass of living forms of butterflies and moths must be regarded as the descendants of original fewer and simple types. The probability that the Lepidoptera root in the Neuroptera, is assisted by the known transformation of the mouth parts and the survival of genera with decidedly neuropterous habit, structure, form. Fritz Miiller, whose researches are worthy of our most sincere admiration, has traced the resemblances between the Phryganide and the Lepidoptera. Speyer considers the Psychide and Tineide the nearest to the Wewroptera, and Packard’s early studies on the structure of the thorax in Hepialus have shown how near existing types of these two suborders of insects approach each other. No doubt in Hepialus and Cossus we have ancient types surviving ; many years ago I[ read a paper trying to show that our primitive Lepidoptera had aquatic larve (like Arzama yet retains), and less perfect transformations. I differ with Butler as to Cossus, not being able to consider it structurally as allied either to Castnia or Sphinz, but as more directly representing a low or old type from which the spinners were, later on, derived. An outgrowth of a primitive unsightly structure, the Lepidoptera now fill the world with beauty and add to the pleasures of mankind. Life, always transforming itself, perishing to appear in new shapes, is the perpetwwm mobile of the universe. It is certainly not to be proved that this will ever disappear if we leave out of sight the specu- lations as to the extinguishing of the sun, which are perhaps more curious than probable. It is a condition of our minds that we imagine a necessary end to all things. Nature, in fact, ends every instant only to transform—bearing children and devouring them. It is our poetical idealization of Nature which makes life supportable to thinking minds. We answer the unanswerable questions, whence, whither, wherefore, of our existence by a poetical apotheosis, or a scheme of usefulness. But when we lay these toys of the mind aside, the misery and faithlessness is only too real, To perish, and to perish in such company! Nor does the materialistic selfishness and insincerity of the present century console us! At atime when more than ever the principles of Christianity are needed, Christianity is going out. Almost do we prefer the intellectual swindle of the last century to what we now suffer. Money rules the world, and the commercial balance sheet is waited for ; not the spring and the new year. Everybody asks me, Does your Entomology, your Art, pay? How much do you get by it? I have even been suspected of using it merely to make monev by it. which. in one sense, complimented me. But 82 eS te Se eee eee eee mainly those who deal in humbug, claptrap, and lies, make money, in Entomology as in other things. If you are poor and have only your good reputation, it is a proof that you have kept yourself reasonably unspotted from a world of deceit and fraud, a world which, in the past at least, has rewarded the betrayer, the successful perjurer, and martyred every human heart that b@at for it, ridiculed and oppressed every intellect that opposed reason to its unreason and folly. In every circle of society and activity, the same story of suffering and wrong is wearisomely repeated. Still, hope remains behind and has not flown even out of our Entomological boxes. Thus I wander from my subject, I hope not altogether aimlessly. The relationship between the butterflies and moths and the flora of any region is so intimate a one, that a word may be said in closing this chapter upon the structure of the . larvee which feed mostly upon plants. The mandibles or jaws of the caterpillars are very powerful machines for biting the food transversely. Especially are the muscles attached to the jaws developed in the Sesiide and wood-feeding Bombyces and Noctuids. The pith of currant bushes and elder is fed upon by several caterpillars, and these internal feeders look like the larvee of beetles, but may be distinguished among other characters by their abdominal feet. The Cossine feed internally on poplar, willow, oak and loeust, and prodigious strength is required to tunnel these hard wooded trees. The way in which the cocoon of Bailey’s goat moth (Cossus Centerensis) is formed out of splinters of the wood has been interestingly described by Dr. Bailey, and at first sight itis wonderful how the moth forces itself through the end of the cocoon, which seems to have no, or little, silk, and finds the open air. That it is through mechanical means that all cocoon makers escape, seems probable, and in Telea Polyphemus a hooklet has been discovered at the base of forewings used in cutting or tearing the silk. The “secretive fluid” theory seems to be now rejected. I have never seen any “secretive fluid” escaping by the mouth and used to soften the threads. The cocoons are protective and probably bad conductors, thus ensuring the safety of the chrysalis during heavy frosts. The first chrysalids were probably formed under water, beneath stones or-in the stems of water plants. That the silk is usually brown and resembles the bark of trees is owing to “ protective” origin, while all cocoons soon “ weather” ; the rain and sun take out the bright surface lines and the cocoon soon comes to look more and more like the surface on which it is formed. The white patches on thecocoon of Platysamia Columbia look like the patches on the bark of the larch. The fields and woods conceal numbers of insects from predatory birds and animals, bringing a percentage through all dangers. The enemiesof insects are so numerous that very slight changes, one must think, would act beneficially upon the preservation of the species. The woods, probably, are more protective than the fields, but the interior of woods seem also the most deserted by insects. The sunlight is probably beneficial, and forces the caterpillars and butterflies and moths into exposed conditions. The tendency to multiply excessively, which the Lepidoptera show, must be kept within bounds, or the balance of Nature would soon become seriously threatened. In every way the adaptation of the insect in its different stages to its total environment is very perceptible and interesting to study. I have shown that the caterpillars of certain Lepidoptera are very plainly inde- pendently influeneed to variation, the perfect insects being much less affected. Larval variation has probably played the most important part in the formation of the species of Datana, etc. I have called such generic assemblages where the contained forms are very close, apparently just separating into ‘‘ species” by the name “ progenera.” Throughout the life of the butterfly or moth modifying agencies are active and, though the frail individual easily perishes at the least unfriendly pressure, yet the species is none the less surely affected by a continued force applied in any given direction under natural con- ditions. TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FRUIT GROWERS’ ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO. 1888. Printed by Order of the Legistutive Assembly. Gorouto : PRINTED BY WARWICK & SONS, 68 AND 70 FRONT STREET WEST. 1889. en ETI, oly th miata p ee id eae | me P Y iee fe ws 4 : art Eeces ae , . iY Ta ths Whe aia a a5 reer Sa ig a” - Lee ay £ ey c i a) BAe Bla ee we : = ; - . ‘ ore ‘ a 2 fa uA u Pies s . . { lw a? ey } nese > seltitd ii * va thas) ‘i hitnge > 4 sah he ; 7 cP ; ae Orn oem << aen , Voth i te, + FNS OY CLAS Mee oe ot eka ¥us " fh fae & 7 ao a) ae ‘ ‘ v 7 n ODERICH, ‘ G > President of the Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario. c McD. ALLA A. ao aN TC BIN oS Pace EAS OP NR PRS ore asi aiaid in vies v's. salvia oo b.p'o eet Pe sala ove aG ca vee Stone Smee 78 RM ese ee MERLE Pale ways elo role. 2 caieie Si s.is Gc aie Rac oc oy dae ence ne anise crlntene one eee 134 NES Here aie cicelncs So Cpe fea cata Toes psceee Ooh c ee Nel ire yr 23 ERIN San IN REO RIERT Ee eter ec a's) ayo Scans so poeaic'ei he sabe a ovis s 06 ss'a nepiealn oate a oue emer 165 CR ie be Ae ie act 5 oie'c a ss le'o'e cd's Web Sla'cle slob lowe oes ote ee tpi ncteeeee 1, 44 EE cities ac oo Sele cae waws be aS vee ba Gh ax en oe eee 11 RP Sie ihn Goss ca Rs CEG oeeble cue eewe Pe eNeidcbie vas cd oe cee eee 22 NEE TREY TAREE CUAOIAL Sc), wk > ad's sis dias ofc sle°d vie'o/e 6 olnts'n' alamie lula tie v's Gu 'do ne Oe xiii MEER RAG STL EAMIMUCOML Gg . 5.0 cie'viacccivdivn ad omatee css deepen ctiemeCanadeee cece else Oma xi Pam Mee Ree no 2 hiss ioc S55 Les eee a Shades eed b eae eeeeerss sat bee 143 ER eal eas 5 a 5 5. 0.a x ald yeh ww ate Doe eNO iEIs. «eyesore a OMe) 48's, n'n, 03 5s ed se 68 ERR CON STEMI ORT so 2 0 sacs ble pants viet eee Dees nminias «c's Ok. ce een wine es pe eee 138 See N PMMIMAR RTA OVERIAI Ye 96 ce cas 9 0S as atin Wie tens steers OR ETE © asoa Do a\S0S 918! Walo eee il RUMP RBERMI TITIAN E: CAS AGILEO USO © 50.7 u's eis rein ai miss Cacia ae) ok arr) a9 oe 907s, sls pre, sot ee aes 45, 101 MCR eet ree eh a. Sh; u/s Praga aie eemiete aly aicio.> 2,01 atsl 9. d\ eats =o c/s 392 = 3 eee 95 prawn in Prince Edward County: .< 02'.0. 00. ce dee cc naes ey Oper SAL. 99 SM AMERIMEAMR TEE TIRED S 22h ssa eats tote Siatein Se se BLA nies, «alu we 3 ma Cieraimsie.= eielnys wierd c' alse aha aoe 148 aie MMMM Ys 3 50a cc "sh entre oS (a, Sip aces. 6 Wo Balmer oyacerats & amb Gina es ciptetes na xili SMS Pe ocx e a sual xis waters Sel oe beiere aise wx w(0 nes miele eMpe wiate's ajafibgl e muph sib auereac en RRR fe aux. ole. o fats 21s 6°00 vo clsivlnip 0/8 65's, t:tre aie eel Uh w wielcia'S alacalahsiesapeiald)-(walsieisupris 102, 105 REM RPCINET LOT 02% c's 5» Bie wet ode fo bras ~ sa ew nls s Kale sls nies OREM Onis oe ae eee 155 EPR TERIE BGO (ook eiraie 0 < ciare/sis elninio evldre- ¢- Salb co's Obi sla wb 6. none MeewIes cece 60, 61, 62 RUE I 220525 a’ x ia.'s\'e B 1h 58 wip oie ewe » ww ees dials ele miele Are gro of osm aldeutefe Aietapeeee 119 MNES ENTRIES ig 5a a= dw. ola a 'sayntin: she aia 2 6 un. 6.0 Reon tne a Nara la iStyles cnn: 2c s pate ae 68 I a oa vec ssa o's its o/n\h Sainibls o'c Bras peiaiticege nme sim aeeain vale eke. cor, ele keene 103 Beds and Bedding Plants, Lawns and Borders........ SAA SIO CT ORE te Bay ois 49 RE Ss Oo en Saba. aa Nasal e oie a ven evaravera: ol alsiau ee! oud 6 Cid, Here aais ae eee 103, 104 TT cn is owl Bis Bo niet cao wi aio amoretam Ml eienic Winters dele. siege stares tate oe 10 EM oe 2 oe sas co de'y oe mieiciase nie 1a) Sieg 0.e ern eleraie's eitlelele 0 o'8 dia giace nase stow =a 193 SESE oh cia sas voix aisja, natn Doe Dk a bial s ace »-6 asl. vim ernsag's ev(u lai o's nla'e ais e's! e am 2 2h ae 68 RMN, a2 ow osc ve de se wagon sever sense. Ep eR Ee EL ho 22 arisen Columbia............. RT ee we ras ee Racial SAA bh es cables ate eee en XViil REM VPM oo 'ohn ss < 0'< occ vn sd ouis Aelain ys ie wiv sire Viv viele sec eesect see eas secs eae 123 By-laws of the F. G. A. of Ontario nc 166 Manadian Apples, superior ...... 200... ceesceceeresecesecceeeeeeesees esses sscceenees 138 Canning Factories, Fruit for. .......-- 2-6 cee ee cece eee eee een e eee e eee ee eee 108 I SS 5 2 52/2 0c da a Scie y Hid bie pias a a mie mid a «ina mlaanlia ial bee alee oe eee 133 Oarpet Bedding... ............ 0c cece tee c eee neete cece ees eten eee en ee eeeece eee eenees 49 Watalpa Specion .......... 60. cc cee c eee c cece cece eee e cence encnees steseeceeeeensanee 120 Ss 5. sw Serie es neu evinaloe ss he alge 'ss a asiais a vise Be ied ehh choo ate ote a Se a ee er ct SE SE PE ee 3 : iv. Pace Cherriesin Prince Edward Courity .:2.i5.<.< #« 2 oa + Slate cua lanahe poninieiG cere RYRCR IR ATER Sieials oie eae PR 130 ASO OTA a vo cv 5 a ans, vistas s,s aaa Perrrerrrrrr rrr ee ee pe cnne nade ole ce iene $142 PacE ie oc wis ifte «cea eee 20 Weetewson the Grape Vine. oo. 5522. -se ace ss siegeeecsisecasines oes fs - ogee oe 151 PEMAERSEAGREDG 5 55 6 65 Sec alee io S lar sieye Bests wis some, cyais lo eine lolly heynual wpe tis ies 2 22 New Fruits, means of introducing ..... -Ye'Wis Bat abdeate pteetepn siete ceetetete a5 ete hae eee 82, 83 Northwest, Nruttsiat the .25ii 365 fees sec hdoes tds casted es ioetndes ts cee ooo eee 79 Riherern FOr ASSO sic 6 Sate Saye < ois old wi siee v o'aw eww cyeja wiclew alnla weloelete © miele ete ail oie. Geno ee x Prehards for Profit, . ; o). 5 25 ossce ae recs ss scde dee as cee en Cabs seu ehiont ees oe 131 eeksres for Ap plen, 25 2655's da ess cies = oN ea ee wwe soe wile a cis ole es Sle a ee xiv ULES ey nee bee ae ne os Meter ca trea Nees brn cette 76, 77, 125, 126 [22 PL Co ee ee errr rn emer re cre ll Pears in Prince Edward County | ...\. 0... sia de re se foe do eies so oes ea 100, 101 Ear OWA PlOss 2 s6 5b. CS tet ee b ae ee Sp tse cea sce teen mee ue oe Ce Rie eee eae 104 Photosrapls of Carpet Beds... 2(25 65.02 ct dass ede ness beee es eccedss eens. tee 51 RPM TOE OAUNING «560s Sie ooo o:5. 2 nes o's Seles eee sle eae Oe c wie oe Oe kines ajare wlohe ee 110 unsssor ihe Ottawa Valley. (s. .. 2.2.0. ss o0 och on se os Cambs aclnSiv ce scm cee enn 64 Ptams, Natives of Northwestern States. 2... 066020600 sce ctece tect twcecsac ds sae 148 AUST) en Ce ee rn erm er eer ere cri 18. relents AGGTEHR. oii. 55 i 5 ee es Se os Salaiels ola ew dlaldi's @ aa e oa lela Se er xiii RAWEGNE 2 oe oo hao roe Ve es eae oS ee J eis Scene no eee ee ee 133 MGI GHG GEAPO . ois 6. eS silo 6 Ne oo ee wie woe we etm clans weenie s ane en 106. eA SUT OU A, <5 5 o's se Soo wie Ge 00 sedlw © ae. 0.S ooo Paks SSIS Sails. & Cipla Ola, shea 66. aaah ery OTE ALIOS 22). x «,<'sphelolafale\eia'b' lafehaaelete «is eatels! a oc ha we oe eee 67, 68, 69 URMMRRESEINIES oe Oe oe go's > aie'e RE a os v toe ee ale shies eta ed ae 5, 96, 100, 109 Easpherry Coltare in the Ottawa Valley .... 2.2... 50.5 seee i oe dean ba 12 Reeser ys Apple. isis is'= o/c'o'e aie rare 0 'sie le s'a'9 ore u's ne 010 1010/0 a labeta ie Siete sos inte te ike = oe 121 Heaspberries for the Home Garden......... 2:00. s0s0e este eweeec cc wweses + oon ee 129° EeinpUCErion, ETOLECHION OF. |... 2. ajs= s/n cee oajs ag 00's serniole © = lapse nin'a = ee 3 3g ee 15. MEER CTEM RT TOUMING | 8 ooo icinn a bow Fac = wewieaie ele lain widtateleie ie con yom Here le eine aie tice oe 71, 136. MSE A POEUN ards so wins aoc 5 oie own oan )myeie aie opal he tora, mie hiaiw merge = kejeyetes ohete vat tena 81 MIMERESE CEAIIORS pe oo ox oor 0 aycin e ys are gece sm omnia eign woe euesecntps as ©) oie ala 90 RMON ora 2 Fe fun Gs cw 5010, nsdic, 2 nfo. x ernie @ mS Stele atelans lola eves et www ip ea tee en ots eee 27 Peer MBG VALI Ofs53 oc cc ss oss oie sie wainsce eereewiieia/e aineinie es aaie ens a ne 128, 133: “ORE TELE ES) a ee eee ER CT 25 RMS oo os, to Sha pl cialis tein sais, © ine ween eee e cent eae e teen teen eee e nsec ee ceene 37 UMBC MPITUOUGE go. g02is ccc = oie scum win a = nss STi wie sa © ol dd wis sia siale m-oinin tele eatin att eee 127 SEEREESY ETOLOCUION. «ccd io, tra.5 12 s,s .aciv em acid me nie oc @hua rm iainale seRiele aia ete ete eine 35, 37, 38, 129 RIE SOPH oo 's'5. alors sins Ae ide ee ne = as 8 balsa a eters bate eet eae ote. sie = Se 3, 121, 145. Schools, Horticulture in...... Aer eee ee om 63 “EES St | i ae ie i oe. re PERE me ee 58 eae WAtOE 5. BO eee « ose wie a's ah fore +d pinie ao. aly mma on ele eyatarae a serge ae oiale ee 10, 11 vu. Paagk ME CNDDIORE, Gia wontiees | Oy os Suse ay sore 122 EEE IRALI eo Pow hada) are snincane © a Kis! Wied’ F oie Sins = Bjis Wie Vea ece Rees peo A 111, 112 a re och t sean cai 5 his ned vos aS ee sed sx npca sn tvs» wae me pelea 10, 11 NE SOM Hee 2 See eee eC ene octet OR as ae ee vine ee seks eee 44 MITTIN Clie OU Saw tis Cidiehe acre nk sae Sols hs eae s See Ns ae we sd day oe bi oes occse som 71 TE aa Eel eS es EEO or Oe ey 145 EIR 8 PRN lt orcs ounce Kh srsidiay oie wurden PA RS Coa t's Coe Oe Sig ba 143. IEEE RTENNIDN. se. 55 Says 5 a2 ohn Sach STS SO Reaie = os o's SG gs 145. MII a oo occ e'c 4 as 5 win ee'w Seo Stet sis Ges Ra's | ess ae we SR ee ee 57 BTC S yah as Ss. Gots b naa do Oran Seah eres we Wise a vie © oe eteeie Oe OU are 181 Women in Horticulture ........... hac SERRE SO MUTE wie sad be eee a ee 57 SI AGE ELON 2. ssw one vos ve yeas eee wile A cayean dda: ale «iene dein wee 122 ERE 5c wha acce Eon ene! s aie GlS Seles ae ces onan os bes 00 wee eee 144 REINER Yala igs “a's -1 0 ais w Ciasgis sisal eye ive én lain ws. eres pein Mat ECR ee 5, 12h A LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS OF ADDRESSES OR PAPERS TO THIS REPORT. —- LAGE Allan, A. McD., Goderich, President F. G. A. of Ontario .............0000. 45, 67, 68, 88, 89 Bell, LL.D., Rev. George, Queen’s College, Kingstone 3. 65 dn Sv ack a'e + Lowi ninen Sp 0 SOR 115 Boulter, Wellington, Proprietor Bay of Quinte Canning Factory, Picton ........ 108, 109, 110 Premoree., Wi:, Ob awa: «sc ica . ca soe oh Se > » cniwin aoe de oe ee 12 Dempsey, EY, Gr, ALBRbOI..': «4c Boome oe o tle sR oe eee oe ee ce 113 wompsey, W. R:, Rednersville, Ont. : 2. 00266 i 2c ocho eae one co opeeeigener Cee 141 Beran, Win., Mayor of. Hamilton /.... J... ses0e~ceccudeedcss.+. ..cs.. S00 xi Fletcher, Prof. Jas., Experimental Farm, Ottawa ......03 a» «ecae2 ris cee sinner 28 Gibb, Chas., Abbotsford; -Quebee, «.:.5. csc odors sane ayaagidine sac x Oe ne 143, 148, 145 Hilborn, W. W., Horticultural Experimental Farm, Ottawa. ........ 22: a: .S0y)ueeeeeee 82 Hoskins, Dr., N ewport, Vermont <2... 2.2. edéswwes cee weet eek OF an ee Ane 9 Jack, Mrs. Annie L., Chateauguay Basin, Quebec. ss. .......0000. +0 ++ de bnien ck ae 57 Lambert, Hon. Mrs., New Bitte 2 spac. 5, «-veyaanheassc Ae eavater shales ay crac ce a 37 petiveenith, Thos. Marmion: % pci. soc uceoake sees ced aimenetews «Lac ee 83 Mitchell, Fred., Innerkip, Ontario.............0.0ceececcecess Wk ca be Salowey See 132 Panton, Prof. J. H., Agricultural College; Guelphss) occ Sens io. 2c cee ee 39, 149 Pattison, W. Meade, Clarenceville, Quebec - 2. i. eee fev ale oleleleece leone os eee 144 Riley, Dr. C. V., Washington, DCa oc 2 oo Seta Soe ee ee 151 Robertson, N., Supt. Government Grounds,’ Ottawa.%\0oe. oes oo e's'w's Des xs 49 Saunders, Prof. Wm., Director Experimental Farm, Ottawa..............0.0- 77, 78, 79, 80 Reon Hon KR: W; Ottawa 's//.2/. ss vos nex ad oe oko oes eee 23, 43 Stewart, Mayor, Ottawa............ OP ESTE Ras oer Oneal ecwtcd. See 44 Willams, John P.; Bloomfield, Ontario... 6.600.000 2edelce de (cseedeess--. 2 ee 99 Woolverton, Linus, secretary F', G;. A> of ‘Ontario, Grimsby, )4.565.45.ceeeee ; -94, 95, 96, 97 Wein, “A. A», “Rerifrow, Ontario: é20 i... iea600065s% ce fe cai des ds nee age 3 Wright, Mrs. A. A., Renfrew, Ont............. seks 6 ee'ee se aacalelas & seeceaee ee enn 33 —__- TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE eKUIT GROWERS ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO, 1888. To the Hon. Charles Drury, Minister of Agriculture - Srr,—I have the honor of submitting to you the Twentieth Annual Report of . the Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario, a volume containing a full account of the meetings held during the past year, and carefully revised copies of all valuable papers contributed. During the past year the Association has met at the city of Ottawa and at the town of Picton, and has had the effect at these places of increasing the public interest in the production of the best varieties of fruit. The discussions have been carefully taken down, and everything irrelevant struck out, so that I believe this Report of our work will meet with your approval. It has been decided by our Directors to unite the Annual and the Winter Meetings of our Association, thus increasing the importance of our winter gathering, and at the same time husbanding our resources for other purposes. An effort has been made during the past year to improve The Canadian Horticul- turist, and to make it more efficient, and this effort seems to be much appreciated by our membership. Should the funds at our disposal permit, it is the intention to enlarge the journal for the year 1889 to thirty-two pages, as its present size is too small for the increasing number of contributions sent in for its columns. I am, Sir, Your obedient servant, ‘ L. WOOLVERTON, Secretary. Alexander McD. Allan. . Andrew M. Smith....... Linus Woolverton, M.A. . Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. Agricultural Division No. OFFICERS FOR 1889. PRESIDENT: PE ER ee oo re he Me ER Goderich. VIcE-PRESIDENT : bots etenese a! sfavsjene aie 6 clea s ewe slave ain a Mie © ahete cates eaeae SECRETARY-TREASURER AND EpIToR: Te Cee eee ee ee Grimsby. DIRECTORS : | MRR el oh gaa ep Be John Croil, Aultsville. 7 aa ar a Ma era sages Ape Se: P. E. Bucke, Ottawa. Siow D - Sat. Ee Rey. Geo. Bell, LL.D., Kingston. Bi ts, Se ene aie P. C. Dempsey, Trenton. Te a ar ns eit net Weeds 2 Thos. Beall, Lindsay. Oe os aie han els ein ane eagle W. E. Wellington, Toronto. | Se eT ME SERRE ee M. Pettit, Winona. SRG, ae mining ene cmraseti a a4} Hi A. H. Pettit, Grimsby. PTD AD; DORAN ORY REP J. K. MeMichael, Waterford. WO) ir cho Oe ae aa an oes 3 J. A. Morton, Wingham. [a eee eS ph rea Ae ag tt J. M. Denton, London. Westari..ck nee Seen edie Judge McKenzie, Sarnia. 1 eee eye ennte wen Sete G. Caston, Craighurst. AUDITORS: SE RS POR EE PP SE I AOS Ce .... Guelph. vie, « Bee. wre. gO epee, ealguekalelinnah sre) aye one ae tease a aaa Binbrook. THE ANNUAL MEETING. The annual meeting of the Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario, was held in the Court House, Hamilton, on Tuesday, the 19th day of February, 1889, at 8 o’clock p.m, The President, Mr. A. McD. Allan, of Goderich, occupied the chair. The minutes of the last annual meeting, as appearing in the Annual Report, were taken as read. The Treasurer’s report, duly audited by Messrs. Charles Drury and James Goldie, was read by the Secretary-Treasurer. This report was received and adopted. The reading of the President’s address being in order, it was moved by Mr. W. E. Wellington, seconded by Mr. W. Holton, and resolved that it be deferred until Wednes- day morning at 10 o’clock. His Worship the Mayor, Mr. Wm. Doran, having arrived, made an address of wel- come, in which he said that as head of the corporation of the city of Hamilton, he had much pleasure in welcoming so important an organization as that of the Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario. He regretted that the city had not at present a hall of sufficient size to accommodate such a large and important meeting as this, but a new city hall was in process of erection which would be a credit to the city, and he was sure it would be at any time at the disposal of the Association. During the thirty years of its history, since its first organization in this city in 1859, the Association had conferred great and lasting benefit upon the country at large. He could remember when, in the Niagara district for instance, very little interest was taken in fruit culture, but now, through the work of this body, that district had become famous as a fruit garden. The President replied as follows :—Myr. Mayor: It is my pleasant duty to thank you for your very kind remarks of welcome. We have frequently met in this city, and some of the most successful of our meetings have been held here. ‘That old hall, upon the site of which you are now erecting a new and elegant edifice, was almost sacred to some of us. It was there that the pioneers of this Association often met. There, I believe, was held one of the last meetings at which the late Charles Arnold met with us, one of those pioneer members. We are glad to hear such remarks from one in your position, We are pleased that the leading men in our country are taking an interest in horticulture as well as in agriculture. A Committee on Nominations was appointed as follows: Messrs. M. Pettit, A. Alexander, and Robert Walker, by the Association, and Messrs. J. M. Denton and Thos. Beall by the chair. This committee submitted their report, which was received, and after the names had been voted upon serzatim, was adopted. Xli. ‘The report was as follows :— President.—A. McD. Allan. Vice-President.—A. M. Smith. Directors.—Messrs. John Croil, P. E. Bucke, Rev. Geo. Bell, P. C. Dempsey, Thos. “Beall, W. E. Wellington, M. Pettit, A. H. Pettit, J. K. McMichael, J. A. Morton, J. M. Denton, Judge McKenzie and G. Caston. Auditors.—Messrs. James Goldie, and Nicholas Awrey, M.P.P. A Fruit Committee was appointed by the chair, consisting of Messrs. W. E. Welling- ton, T. H. Race, and A. Alexander. At a meeting of the Board of Directors, held subsequent to the election, L. Woolver- ton, of Grimsby, was appointed Secretary-Treasurer ot the Association, and Editor of the Canadian Horticulturist. TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE YEAR 1887-8. RECEIPTS, ee eS e— “Balance on hand last audit Members’ fees PIOSEPLISEMENGS Foci ce eee Ne oe ‘Back numbers and bound volumes .... Discount on plants, etc Government grant ee ee Total receipts ee e ry _ | 4,429 28 | EXPENDITURE. $c | Plant distribution. .2. 0082s setae 325 95 | Directors” expenses). scmccae ee ee 427 70 | Express-and' duty... 2... tose eee 142 22 || Chromo lithographs.................. 337 60 Printing and stationery.............. 83 71 Audit, 1887-822 o.3) Wb ec. soe 10 00 Postage and telegrams....... ....... 82 67 | Casefor medals. [.22).: odsecete eee 6 00 |: Ginall items 55155 see) tee Ro 1 34 \\. Hlectrotypesit...4.-'o.6..252, 355. Sa 45 45 Commissions .......d02%, «1.4 0-.5 ae oe 95 53 Caretaking of rooms for meetings .... 6 00 Canadian Horticulturist (including balance to Copp, Clark & Co...... 1,422 92 Stenoprapher 3. agg It may be rolling—level, hilly and rough, and advantage of each condition en. To attain the beautiful a level or gently rolling surface is to be used in preference to the hilly and rough, which more properly belong to the picturesque. A road to the residence is a very essential feature in a well laid out ground. It was once thought, that this should lead directly to the house and by the shortest way ; now taste demands, if at all possible, it should be more or less curved. The direction of the road is important in the scene, as it will present the parts in the most effective way in passing through the grounds. Trees should be so arranged in reference to it, that there should always be some part of the building in sight, and as the visitor continues his approach the view keep changing until the whole is in view. It spoils the effect very much if the same part is seen from the beginning to the end. 3. Water—Whether in the form of lake, pond, river or rivulet, in the hands of the skilful supplies much to adorn a landscape. 42 The appearance of the water from different points; the natural outlines of its shores ; beautiful walks, that may be made to skirt it, and meander away to other parts, all can be so arranged as to form a very attractive scene. Few objects afford better facilities to render a scene effective than the prescene of water. 4, Rocks.—The occurrence of these supplies favorable conditions to the gardener, and gives scope especially for the development of the picturesque, big blended with the beautiful gives all the most exacting could desire. To use all these conditions to the very best results in Bees : a landscape pleasing to the eye and a subject well suited to develop noble thoughts in the mind, lies in the domain of landscape gardening. To be successful in this I am quite sure from what has been said any one will admit, that this art requires no ordinary talent, and as already noted at the outset, such a talent falls to the lot of few. It may be improved, but can hardly be formed by the adoption of fixed rules. In Canada there- is much room for a development of greater taste in the arrangement of grounds around many homes. Nature has done much, and it now remains for art to add to this, and render these places more attractive. Our country is young, but we are advancing, and it does appear that one of the signs of progress is a development of taste. To make a few suggestious that would serve to introduce the subject of taste in the arrangement of grounds for discussion by the members of the Fruit Growers’ Association this paper has been written. The task has been undertaken unfortunately at a time when there was not the leisure necessary to do justice to the theme ; but I hope a few thoughts have been given that may supply food to observing minds. Mr. Caston.—I think this isa very important question. Although we know agri- culture is the most important industry, there is a tendency now-a-days for farmers’ sons to get away from the farm, and the consequence is that while the professions are over- crowded, the work of the farm is regarded 2s drudgery. Now, I think one of the best ways of curing that evil is to endeavor to make the home attractive. You see very little landscape gardening or attractive homes among the farmers, and if you ask the reason you will always get some such answer as that they haven’t the time. Now, I don’t know how far that is true, but I think they might find time to do most of it, and that by making the home attractive, they will succed very effectually in keeping the members of the family at home. I was talking a short time ago with a gentleman down in our neigh- borhood who is quite a successful farmer. He had a lot of little boys running round hin, and he said, “ 1 want to make these boys farmers ; I want to make them believe that this old farm is the most attractive place they can find anywhere in the country,” and I think that is the way farmers should educate their children, so that the children can point out their home with pride, and say, ‘‘That is where we live.” It does not matter that a man has not a very grand house if his surroundings are beautiful ; that makes all the difference. A man may have ever such a nice house standing in a bare field without any natural surroundings of beauty, which is not nearly so pleasant a home as a much less pretentious house aud grounds that are laid out with taste and an eye to the beautiful. In some of the older counties a little is being done in that direction by farmers, but asa general rule, you will find that landscape gardening is confined to the cities and townsin Canada. I think that ought not to be, and I think if there could be any way devised to induce the farmers to follow the example of the towns and villages, it would be of great benefit to the country at large. Mr. Scorr.—I scarcely claim to be landscape gardener. I have laid out a place of twelve or fifteen acres according to my own ideas. I think there is no part of the world in which such facilities are found as here for landscape gardening. Our country is so beautifully diversified, hill and dale; mountain and valley ; unruffled lake and murmur- ing stream are everywhere to be seen. But speaking more particularly of those who come from the colder portions of the country, where the snow covers the ground for three 43 ——— or four months in the year, I think it is very much to be regretted that more attention is not drawn to the great beauty of our evergreens. Spruces, pines and cedars are unequalled in beauty, and it is seen most in the winter season. As a rule, our evergreens are grown in clusters, the individual development of the tree is not promoted. No one can see the charm of a perfect spruce unless it is grown in an open space, and has a certain circumference to itself. There are some evergreens, such as hemlock, for instance, which do well in summer. I think Mr. Fletcher referred to some of them, and they are things of beauty all the year through. In this part of Canada, in eastern Ontario particularly, there is nothing which so diversifies the winter scenery as evergreens ; they present a relief to the eye in our winter landscape which has a value scarcely, I think, appreciated. In planting orchards. I should advise everyone to plant one evergreen tree to every four or five fruit trees. It is wonderful the influence they have upon the surrounding deciduous trees ; it is remarked that it is always warmer in the vicinity of evergreen trees. Those who have driven through evergreen forests have noticed that it is warmer there. That, no doubt, is partly owing to the protection from cold winds, but I have also noticed in the open country that the snow invariably left earlier in the vicinity of evergreens, and my success, whatever it amounts to, in growing fruit, is largely due to the fact that I have dotted my apples over with evergreens ; not alone in hedges, though I have some in hedges, but mingled through the garden, where they add very much to the winter beauty ; they make the garden a pleasing spot to look at, even in the winter season. It is not pleasing to look over the orchard when the leaves are all off and the trees are barren, but if you have evergreens dotted through, not in symmetrical proportions, but just where the eye will fall on them as it takes in the panoramic scene around, it is wonderful how attractive the winter scenes of Canada can be made. I may say, that upon one occasion, I put in a hedge which was certainly five or six hundred feet in length, and did it all in three days. I dug a trench first about two feet six inches by eight inches, and just sent the men out to the woods with the waggons and they brought in the evergreens on a rainy day, which in general is the time I should recommend—a rainy day in June. I do not think I lost two per cent. in putting in that particular hedge. I mention this merely for the purpose of illustrating the facilities there are in this country for planting evergreens. I have very few foreign evergreens in my grounds ; almost all of them are indigenous to Canada, and I simply got afew out of the woods when they were small trees, and I find no difficulty whatever in making them grow, bearing in mind these two important points, that according to the locality either the end of May or the beginning of June is the best time— Ihave moved them every month in the summer, but in the months of July and August much more care is needed, but if you have a rainy day, and I would not advise you to put them in unless you have, the chance of loss is very trifling—and that in moving them from place to place in your grounds, the sun must not be allowed to play on, nor the driving winds to blow on the roots. There are few places in Canada which might not be made picturesque if a few evergreens were interspersed over the lawn, orchard or garden. I think in an orchard in eastern Ontario, apart from the beauty and the little ground they occupy, their influence over the deciduous trees would make them very valuable. In lay- ing out an orchard, I put in every fifth or sixth tree, so arranging them that they break the monotony of the ordinary line ot evergreen. Then, of course. there are other beauti- ful trees, the maple and elm, which grow all through Canada. This is a subject upon which much might be said, and which might be discussed at great length. It is one of those things, however, in which you have to instruct the people by example. We have just listened to a beautiful paper, very ably written, and which I hope will be reproduced, but in order to induce people to make their places look beautiful, we have to do our share through the eye, by the perceptive faculties, by setting before them a good example. We know what an influence the parks ‘and squares in cities have exerted, even on people living in the country, and that is the reason all leading cities, not ot this continent alone, but in the Old World as well, beautify them. People are influenced by what they see. No human being is so low as not to be influenced by the sight of beauty, and it is our duty to do our share as we have opportunity, and avail ourselves of every chance to add to the beauty of the world in which we live. Iam very glad to do my share, and I am 44 sure that all here who have a taste in that direction will have similar feelings. The culture of a taste of this kind always creates a refined and elevating feeling, and I am glad to say that in Canada this feeling is growing, and is to be felt all over the land. THE FRUIT EXHIBIT. The following gentlemen were appointed a committee to report on the exhibit of fruit :—Messrs. W. W. Hillborn, R. B. Whyte and P. E. Bucke. AN ADDRESS OF WELCOME. On the opening of the evening session Mayor Stewart, on behalf of the corporation -and citizens ot Ottawa, delivered the following address of welcome : Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, on behalf of the citizens of Ottawa I desire ° to tender you a most hearty weicome on the occasion of your meeting here. Apart from the official position I hold, I wish to tell you, sir, and the members of your Association, that I take a deep and warm personal interest in the prosperity and success of your Association. You have done a great deal of good, not only in this country and the United States, but also in the old country, in disabusing the minds of people as to the climatic character of our country. I have visited the old country three or four times, staying there for long periods—on one occasion nine months—and the greatest difficulty I had to contend with was in speaking with people in different parts of England and Scotland, who imagined that we had a country only fit for Indians and half-breeds to live in, and that so far as growing fruit and civilization was concerned we were away behind. Now, sir, I think that idea has been pretty much dispelled by the large and magnificent dis- play of fruit made by your organization in the old country at the Colonial Exhibition. I had not the privilege of being present at that Exhibition, but a great number of my friends who were there tell me that that fruit display did the greatest credit to Canada, and I believe it very materially stimulated emigration to this country from Great Britain. Having accomplished so much good in that way in the past, what may you not expect to do in the future? At the Centennial Exhibition, too, which I had the pleasure of attending, you made a most admirable show, and I am told that last year, before the American Pomological Society at Boston, you made a most creditable ex- hibition. Taking these things into consideration, I think, sir, that your Association deserves the greatest encouragement from all persons who take an interest in fruit growing, and have at heart the interest of this Canada of ours. I am very sorry indeed that you could not have visited our city in the summer time, because we have now some- thing which will attract your society—I mean the Experimental Farm. That farm is ably managed by gentlemen who have always taken a deep interest in all horticultural matters ;. I refer to Prof. Saunders, Mr. Hillborn, Mr. Fletcher and some others. I hope on some future occasion you will be able to visit us in the summer so that we can show you what can be done in Ottawa in the line of fruit growing. I thank you very much for the kind inter- est with which you have listened to my few “imperfect remarks, and am glad to have had the opportunity of being here to-night. I again ex end to you a very hearty welcome on behalf of the city of Ottawa. The Presipent.—On behalf of the Ontalid Fruit Growers’ Association, Mr. Mayor, it gives me very much pleasure to reply to your kindly remarks. We have worked assiduously in the past to educate the people of this province, and I can assure you that such kindly remarks as you have made to-night are most grateful, and as I said before will stimulate and encourage us in this great work. It has afforded me a great deal of pleasure to visit your city, even at this season of the year, and it is our intention, as you suggested, on some future occasion, probably not far distant, to visit your city again as an association at a more favorable season. We follow with much interest the experiments which are being carried on at the Experimental Farm here under the super- intendence of Prof. Saunders and his staff of assistants. We look upon this as a most decided step in advance, and one that will materially strengthen our hands. Prof. Saunders was one of the ablest and most energetic officials of this association, occupying the chair for several years in the most acceptable manner. When losing him we felt that we were losing one of our best men, but we felt at the same time that in assuming the responsibilities of his present position he would strengthen our hands even more, perhaps, than by direct connection with the associatioh. 1 thank you again for your most kindly remarks and trust that at no very distant day in the future we may again visit your city, until which time I trust your citizens will maintain the same lively in- terest in our association that has been shown so markedly during our prssent visit. THE QUESTION DRAWER. The following subjects were discussed from the question drawer : BEST GRAPES FOR COLD LATITUDES. Question.—Will Mr. Charles Gibb give us a list of the grapes he prefers ? Mr. Giss.—First the Delaware, then the Brighton, next the Worden or Herbert or Arwninia. (The Herbert is Rogers’ 44). My preference is rather for the Worden; next comes the Lindley, (Rogers’ 9) ur Massasoit (Rogers’ 3); next the Duchess. When grapes were up before I noted down one or two new varieties, very little grown. Firs, of all comes the Chasselas; I don’t know if it isthe same you call the Ohasselas de Fontainbleau. The Concord Chasselas was produced some years ago by Mr. Campbell of Ohio, who sold it out as being good for nothing. However, it is a good sized berry, and a literal sack of juice, rich and sweet. The Concord Muscat, also by him, produces a fair grape; I fruited it in 1886 but not in 1887, I only had fruit one year; itisa little tender, and we had slight frost last year. Another is the Rochester, of Elwanger and Barry, which is very red with a very large bunch, the largest I have; I always put the Rochester in for the heaviest bunch of red. I have been away a good deal, and it has been allowed to overbear, but in spite of that I always get my largest bunch from it. They are of fair, good quality. The Munroe, also of Ellwanger and Barrv, is a grape of very fair quality, rather small, but a long and compact bunch. Then Rogers’ 502 is a fair sized bnnch, sweet with a little acid. I may say that my place is on a hillside, ‘ex- posed, about forty miles east of Montreal and not more than four miles south of it. BEST APPLES FOR SHIPMENT TO EUROPE. QueEst1on.— What varieties of apples are the best for shipment to Europe ? . The Presipent.—lIf I were answering that question as regards to varieties that are grown or can be grown here it might be difficult for me to say, but I can tell you the varieties which we find command the highest prices in Europe. I will begin with the Ribston Pippin, the Blenheim known as Blenheim Orange, then. King of Tompkins County follows close upon its heels. If you want to go earlier than that take the Cravenstein, but these command the highest prices. Then the Northern Spy and Twenty- ounce come together ; this Cabashea, or Twenty-ounce Pippin, has come up wonderfully in the British market. The American Golden Russet is up well, but the difficulty about them;is that shippers as a rule ship all the standard winter apples at the one time, and the result of that is that they don’t get the proper value for the American Golden Russetts. The Russetts should not be shipped until after the first of January ; they are not wanted in the old country until after that, and where storage can be had by all means store the American Golden Russett until after the first of January, and then the 46 shipper will get the full price. The Rhode Island Greening came up very well in price this year. It has been considerably below the Baldwin, but is now about even with it, or nearly so. I look upon the Baldwin as one of our best paying apples in the west on account of its keeping qualities and its shipping qualities, though I would not be in the least surprised myself to see the Baldwin go out entirely from the British market on account of poor quality ; for we find that people in that market are looking much more to quality now than they used todo. They used to consider color almost entirely and never questioned the quality of the apple. They did not seem to know anything at all about that, and they don’t know very much yet, but they are learning, and Ii believe there will be a considerable difference in grading apples in a few years, and such apples as Ben Davis and the Baldwin will go comparatively out of the market and the high quality apples come in and come up in price. I believe prices are not at their height yet. For several years past they have been advancing very steadily, for our only com- petitors in that market are the Americans. This year we took a jump far ahead of them ; our best fruits on the British markets being worth from three to five shillings a parrel more than their best brands of apples at the same time, and in a great many cases even more than that. In fact as soon as they know it isa Canadian grown apple they want it at once, and ifit is a fine sample they want it regardless of price, and they are bound to have it. Mr. Buckre.—How do our apples compare with the same varieties grown in the Old Country ? The PrestpENt.—You would scarcely recognize them, so great is the difference. True, there is something of the shape and color, but the color is much brighter here, and the size is altogether beyond theirs. They only get about one-half the size we get in any of our varieties here, and as for color in highly colored apples, the color there is very sickly. It is not that bright, lively color which we get here. The only apple I took the slightest fancy to in that country was one called the Wellington, a winter apple there, and apple growers there told me it was the only apple they were making any money out of, of their own growth. I liked the look of the apple, even as grown there. It is fully as large, possibly even larger than the Baldwin, and had a much livelier color, even there, than our Baldwin. I think in this climate it would have a still brighter color than there, and possibly some change in the quality ; and even there I considered the quality was pretty fair. I went to a man there to get some scions. He said he would give me some, but he said, “ Don’t allow any of the wood of that apple to go to Canada.” I said why. ‘ Well,” he says, “it is the only apple we can make anything out of here now, and if those Canadians get any, we are done.” I at once informed him that I was a Canadian, and he then refused me. I told him I was going to get that wood, and I did. It certainly made a most magnificent growth. I consider the Wellington, as grown in England, better than the Baldwin as grown here, and it is an apple that will cover the same season as the Baldwin. Mr. A. M.Smiru.—A gentleman in St. Catharines had a few trees and it is entirely new to me; I am much taken with it. Mr. Gips.—If you could have added the Duchess, Fameuse and Alexander, I should have been very glad. The Presipent.—I didn’t intend to slight Quebec by any means. There is no ques- tion about it, I don’t know any apple we have that would bring a better price in the British Market than Fameuse if we could only get it there in perfect order. I did think of suggesting the Fameuse in small half barrels, such as they use in Virginia for Newton Pippins ; they would look very fine, and could probably be handled a little better. They want to be shipped in smaller quantities than the common apple barrel, because they seem to crush badly, although we did have some this last season that arrived in pretty good order. Then the Duchess would sell at very high prices, I have no doubt about that ; in fact, I have tested the Duchess myself; some specimens were got over in very good order indeed. We had some at the Colonial which arrived in very fine shape, but the Duchess had to be picked considerably on the green side. If there were only a system of cold storage on the steamship lines there would be no difficulty whatever in shipping and landing Duchess apples in perfect order on any of the British markets. 47 Mr. Hamitron.—Speaking of English Apples, did you see the King Pippin ? The Presipent.— Yes. Mr. Hamitton.—The reason I ask is that last time I was with our society in Mon- treal the question was asked before 100 fruit growers what was their best apple, and without exception they put the King Pippin first. It is an apple almost indistinguish- able from the Cellini, and I would like to know if that is correct. The Cellini, as we grow it, is pretty large, about as large as the Alexander, but a little longer. The PrestpEnt.— It does not narrow into the eye like the Alexander. Mr. Hamitton.—No. The Cellini at my place is all right ; it has proved the har- diest of all the old apples I have had, leaving out of question the Duchess. It is a very fine tree and a heavy bearer, and the fruit is fine in size and quality. Mr. Dempsry.—I have seen the Cellini and King Pippins tried; you will almost invariably find that the King Pippins produce some enlargement on one side, while the Cellini is perfect in form. Nor is the King Pippin so highly colored as the Cellini; they area distinct variety. Now, I wish toadd a word or two in regard to the shipment of apples. If we can ship in small half barrels, I believe there is less risk in shipping such varieties as the Duchess of Oldenburg, Fameuse, Wealthy and Gravenstein. If we ship Golden Russetts in the month of January they are liable while being transported by rail to Montreal or any other point where they are to be put on board ship to become very cold—perfectly chilled, and sometimes perfectly frosted ; then, when they are placed in the body of the ship, where a turnip in ten days would grow an inch and a half or two inches, they are sure to condense moisture from the warmer atmosphere, and the fruit becomes saturated with water, and in eight or ten days a small barrel of fruit would be spoiled. Now, if they start in the fall in good order there are very few that spoil. By packing in small barrels the pressure is not so great. I believe there is less risk in shipping fall apples than in shipping winter apples. Mr. Bucke.—Could you not ship winter apples in the fall ? Mr. Dempsey.—They don’t command good prices in the fall. The President rather gave us to understand that Ben Davis and the Baldwin were going out of the market. Now, I want to inform you just here that my Ben Davis stood at the top of the list this year in England, and it is hard to get around that. There is another variety which stood very high this year,—the Westfield Seek-no-further, which commanded very fine prices. ‘Then there is another apple of which we have never been able to send any before this year—the Mackintosh Rea, which is a beautiful apple, and it commanded fancy figures. Mr. Bucke,—What do you call a fancy figure ? Mr. Dempsry.—I call thirty shillings a barrel a fancy figure, and it is a price that will pay us very well. We sometimes have to put up with half or a quarter of that. There are several other varieties coming into notice. Respecting Cox’s Orange Pippin, along about Christmas and the month previous to Christmas they were unpacking them at Covent Garden and putting them in hampers ; what they there call a hamper is supposed to contain four even peck measures, but really does not hold a great deal more than three pecks ; and they have been quoted there at fifteen shillings a bushel this year ; that is more than thirty shillingsa barrel. I haven’t seen any quoted so high this year as Cox’s Orange Pippin. The Presipent.—Mr. Dempsey has misunderstood my remarks as to Ben Davis and the Baldwin. Isaid that peoplein the Old Country were looking at quality so much now that I believed the time was coming when those apples would go out. They have not gone out yet, although Rhode Island Greening is almost even in price with the Baldwin now. We know that these apples are poor in quality, and 1 believe that in Britain they will eventually come to that conclusion. Mr. Smita.—Some of our most successful grape growers are getting higher prices for the Champion than for any other variety. 48 BEST STRAWBERRIES FOR THE VICINITY OF OTTAWA. Q.—What kinds of Strawberries succeed best in the vicinity of Ottawa ? Mr. P. E. Bucxe.—I don’t think I can give much information about the Strawberry, as I have not any ground of any extent, and I am sorry to say that although I believe Ottawa is about the finest place in the world to grow strawberries, there is not a straw- berry grown in Ottawa. We get them almost entirely from the west and from Brock- ville. I think our friend here who deals in berries can tell you more about what is not grown in Ottawa. I think if a man started here with afew acres he would make a fortune. The strawberries we get here are brought from a distance, and they are not what they ought to be. Mr. Scott grows a good many, but unfortunately he is not here to-night,—the Hon. R. W. Scott. Mr. Hamitton.—My place, as I think I have said before, is about half way between Ottawa and Montreal, and I have grown about half a dozen varieties. I have not hitherto been growing them for market, but last year the man who keeps the station res- taurant took some of them. The varieties I had were Minor’s Great Prolific, Mount Vernon, Duchess, Manchester and Sharpless, and Bidwell. I think of these Minor’s Pro- lific bore the most heavily. The Sharpless berries were larger, some of them being two and a half inches in diameter, and would make two or three mouthfuls. The bed that bore so heavily was only two years planted. It was made from poor soil, made up with swamp muck that had been put up for a couple of years. We took off the patch, we had ten rows about an acre long, ten quarts a day for about a fortnight ; that is at the latter _ end, We used them very largely ourselves before we began to sell them, because we didn’t like to see them going to waste, and we also made a distribution of them among the neighbors. I think we had probably 250 quarts off the patch. I would put Minor’s Prolific first, and the Sharpless second, and the Cumberland, which I think I omitted mentioning, third. The Mount Vernon did not bear very heavily, but it is a delicious berry ; and last of all I put the Bidwell, though it didn’t have exactly the same treatment as the others, I kept it apart ; it might have done as well as some of the others if it had been grown with them. I think, as Mr. Bucke has said, that it would pay any person to begin growing for the Ottawa market at the rates that these turned out to be. Mr. O’Connor.—I have not grown many strawberries. In regard to the Sharpless, although the berries are very large, I do not think upon the whole that it is a very desir- able variety. I think the Wilson is good amongst the new varieties, but of course I am ~ not experienced. Mr. Bucke’s remarks about there being no strawberry growers here are very correct, our berries all come from Brockville and the west. It is very surprising to me that our gardeners should allow this, and I hope this discussion may have the effect of inducing some of them to make a start. Mr. Caston (Craighurst).—The nature of the remarks just made make me almost inclined to come down here and start strawberry cultivation ; and I certainly think there is a great opportunity for some one to make money here. It seems to me that if you can grow such grapes as we have seen here to-day, you should be able to grow magnificent strawberries. A gentleman here to-day spoke of the shortness of the season. Now, I think the strawberry season is longer than the raspberry season, because you can get early, medium and late ; sour, sweet or go-between. In our locality we have nothing better than the Wilson, which is something like the Concord grape for hardiness, crop, and standing transportation ; I don’t think there is anything yet that can beat it. But you don’t want to eat the Wilson before it is ripe ; a good many people jndge harshly of it because they do so. If you want something sweet .' would recommend the Sharpless. I have been surprised at hearing so little said about the strawberry here, and one gentle- man in speaking about raspberries seemed to be against the strawberry. That is not my experience at all, nor do I think it is that of anyone from the west. I think there is no other fruit that will produce as much for the ground it occu ‘9s as the strawberry. Mr. Wuyvre.—After the uncomplimentary manner in which I spoke of the straw- berry this morning I suppose I should hardly say anything about it now. Still I have grown a good many strawberries here, and I gave them up, not because I didn’t like (x 49 them, but because I like the raspberry better. When I did grow them the Wilson suc- ceeded very well, but I think it is surpassed by the Crescent Seedling. The only berry I had good success with in point of quantity was the Dominion, it was perfectly satisfac- tory, a large berry of first-rate quality. The Sharpless I never got much out of, we got large berries, but very few of them. BEDS AND BEDDING PLANTS, LAWNS AND BORDERS. Mr. N. Robertson, Superintendent of the Government grounds at Ottawa, read the following paper : Lawns are especially difficult things to deal with, and never can be properly dealt with unless the subject is before you, owing to the diversity of positions and surround- ings which must always be taken into consideration. Borders are generally treated as if they were the dumping ground of all sorts of material with regard to any particular position. To detail how to fill a border properly, I consider a far more difficult task than beds. There are so many things to be thought of, such as to insure a general dis- persion of flowers over it during the season, with a proper regard to the blending of colors, and many other material points. Besides this, it is considered more of a perma- nent institution, as perennials are mostly used in its construction, it requires much maturer thought to plant it properly. Beds then form part of my subject to-night. Time will allow me only to take a passing glance at what such designs should be. There is a rule laid down for this, but [ will not say whether we adhere to them or not. It is that designs of beds should always be in keeping with the architecture of the building ; that is to say, if they are Gothic, then the beds sbould be the same, and so on with the other styles of architecture. There are few studies which open up a wider range of thought than that which bedding plants do; for, although a certain number is called by that name, yet there so many that can be used for this purpose that it is hard to strike a line between them and say what is or what is not a bedding plant. There is nothing, I can assure you, can be more pleasant to me than to say anything that will be instructive or useful to your association. Bedding plants, then, covers so much that I shall be able only to deal with the most prominent and useful. To enable me to better explain the different positions they hold towards each other, I will divide them into different sections, by calling them dwarf, medium, tall and flowering plants. Although they can be used in conjunction with each other, grading them from the centre or back ground, yet I prefer them separate for my present purpose, so as to give you a more decided idea of the work they are best adapted for, and make myself more easily understood. First, then I will take up what is known as Carpet Bedding. This is, perhaps, the most expensive of all bedding, as it requires such a large quantity of plants and labor to filla bed. I cannot refrain from speaking of a recommendation given some years ago in a daily paper, which has always taken a great interest in horticulture and done much to _benefit it. When this system of bedding was looming up, it had depicted a bed that was seen in one of the English parks on an extensive scale. To carry out this recommenda- tion, gentlemen were told to ask their wives to forego a silk dress for that season, putting its cost into plants that they might have sucha bed. This bed contained no less than fourteen thousand plants! I will leave you to compute the cost at the lowest possible price for which they can be had, and see how many would undertake such a bed. I do not want you to infer from this that you cannot have a carpet bed at a very small cost, This system of bedding may well be said to have gotten the better of good judgment, . The great trouble with it has been that it has driven so many of our flowering plants from our gardens. But the tide has now turned; and some writers most forcibly con- demn it altogether for tL q very fault, and because it contains so few varieties, Although they were varied in design, yet it became monotonous and wearisome to the eye. But I should be sorry to see it driven from our gardens altogether. As there is no part in bedding that can better show the good taste and intelligence of the party than this can, A (F.C 50 eee a limited amount of it gives diversity of position and a varied dispersion of plants. No one should attempt this sort of bedding on a large scale unless he has a good command of glass to carry a considerable stock through winter, for some of the plants being tropical, require a high temperature, and cannot be kept over without it. This is also a material point in the cost of carpet bedding. ; Foremost, and perhaps the best and most prominent of all bedding plants in the dwarf section is the Alternantheras, of which there are many varieties, but the best and most desirable to use in the red colors is Parychoides Major. This variety is of later intro- duction than many of the others and far exceeds them in brightness of color, and the one I prefer above all others of thisshade. In the yellow, there are only two varieties that I know of, Aurea and Aurea nana Compacta, the last far exceeds the other in every respect, com- pacter and of a clearer yellow. These are all the colors required of them, as none of the other varieties can so effectively fill their place. They are a tropical plant, native of | Buenos Ayres ; the name alludes to the anthers being alternately fertile and barren. The more exposed the position, the brighter will their colors show. Evade putting them either in a shady position or in damp cold soil. Next to them may be placed the Golden and Silver Thymes. There is also a green variety, but the first two are the most in use for bedding purposes. Like the Alter- nanthera, its growth is compact, but it differs in constitution, being hardy in parts of the Dominion, but not so here; it has to be housed during the winter as the other, and kept in a cool dry temperature. Itis a native of Spain, and has become naturalized in Britain. This plant is admired for its smell and is extensively manufactured and used for seasoning purposes, that is to say the green variety. Pyrethrum Aureum, or Golden Feather, as it is commonly called, is a hardy perennial, which may be taken up in the fall and laid in some sheltered corner covered up, and taken up and divided in the spring into many plants, giving you a large quantity of them , but the better plan is to raise it from seed every year, as you will have brighter color from seed- lings than from the old plants. It is unlike the two former in this respect, it will not look well under shears’ trimming, and instead of using the shears pull off the straggling leaves by hand that get out of shape. There are other varieties of it, but I have found them no improvement on this one. Leucophyton Brownti is what may be called the whitest of all plants. In looking at it, you would almost think it was silver wire, and is most beautiful when well developed ; but upon the whole, it is not a plant seen much in use because of its slow growth and diffi- . culty of propagation from cuttings ; it takes two years to have good plants, and although it makes a line or band of much beauty, will never be popnilar. Salvia officinalis is a white and green-leafed plant with much larger leaves than the former which I have described. It is also of taller and less compact growth than any of the former, but, when on rather a poor soil with plenty of sun, it makes a very pretty line. I+ must be trimmed into shape with the knife which it bears well. It is a native of Mexico, but stands considerable frost, but cannot be called hardy. ~ Achryanthus wallacei can well be made a splendid associate of the last plant. It is not like the others of its sort; itis a much lower grower and the leaves are much smaller, more resembling the Alternantheras in their taller forms than an Achryanthus. It is of very recent introduction, but, from my experience of it last summer, it promises to become a favorite plant. Its color may be said to be a dark brown. It will have to be trimmed as the sabia, which treatment it bears well. Cerastium tomentoswm, or Snow in Summer, as it is often called on account of the numerous white flowers with which it literally covers itself in summer. Its light foliage is what classes it amongst these plants for bedding purposes. It is a perfectly hardy perennial, and although it looks best when not allowed to flower, it will clip into any shape, yet it does not care to be removed frequently, which mars its respectfulness as a bedder considerably. Its best position is as a border around a bed where it may stand several years, I have had it trimmed into a half-round shape so nicely that parties would ask if it was stone, so compact and close will it become. Echeverias are plants much used in this kind of work. Planting is all the care they require. Like all this class of succulent plants their situation must be dry and warm, as 4 ——aeeel ee pda 51. Puate I, See page 51 they are very tender and will not stand the lightest frost, being natives of Mexico, Damp positions must be avoided for them, or they will rot. There are many varieties of them, but I will only select two of them; (1) Secunda, of a dark green color and a more robust grower than the (2) Secunda Glauca, which'is noted for its bluish green shade. Those plants throw out numerous offsets during the summer which should be taken off in the fall and put into boxes of sand. They will soon root and make the best plants for next season’s work. Any dry corner in the hot-house will suit them, near the light; a large quantity can be put into a box. Sempervivum tectorum, or House Leek, and known also as “ Live forever,” which also is signified by the words semper and vivo, from which the name is derived ; and surely it deserves it, for I think nothing in the shape of dryness will kill them. Moisture only will do this. Unlike the other Echeverias, with which they are often confused, they are perfectly hardy ; the hardest trost seems to have no effect on them. They are propagated from their offsets in any quantity. The old plants are apt to come into flower, and then they die out; but good sized offsets taken off with the short stem they have, and planted, will not one of them miss. They are natives of the Canary Islands, but may be said, like the thymes, to be indigenous to Britain. There are many varieties of them, some of them very small but beautiful, too numerous to detail here. Now, I have touched ona few of the most prominent varieties of plants used in carpet beds ; except such as are used for filling figures, or for the carpet ground on which figures are made. Of these there are a great variety of sedums, but I shall take one that is commonly known as Irish moss, Sedum Acre. Like the Sempervivum there is no kill to it. Many complain of its spreading habits, but of this I do not complain, as I can always with a little attention keep it within the bounds, and I know of nothing that makes a better ground than this does, if you only clip the flowers from it. If you allow it to flower, it will become rusty looking and unsightly ; if it gets too high you can press it down with the hand, or even a piece of board, and it will not show any signs of disap- proval. You can tear it into as many pieces as you like, and sow it on the surface of the soil, throwing some earth on it, and you will soon see a nice green sheet spring from it, There is said to be a variegated form of this, but I have never been able to get it. [ have recommended this one above all the others although some of them are far more beautiful; yet its hardiness and tenacity of life makes it come under the control of every one. Mesembryanthemum cordifolium is a tender perennial. It belongs to the Oape of Good Hope, and there are numerous varieties of it. This one, I suppose, must bea hybrid from some of them, and is valuable for its color, being a greenish yellow, very distinctive and useful as a carpet or for filling in dark figures. It can be raised from seed, but is surest to grow from cuttings. Any quantity of moisture will soon destroy and rot it off, and being succulent very great care must be taken to preserve it, Oxalis tropeoloides is of a dark brown color, and if also useful in filling in light colored surroundings. It is a perennial and tender, and can be raised from seed, but seems to prefer doing this for itself, for if the seeds are old they are hard to germinate, In taking it into the house it soon matures its seed-pods and explodes them all over your shelving and pots, and creates much trouble to remove; it is sweet boxed up for the winter, and divided up in the spring, And now, before going into the other sections in which I have classed those plants, I here show you photograph of beds composed of the plants I have enumerated on the Government grounds here. This one (See Plate I.) was produced last year, intending to show, in a feeble way, that I entered into the spirit of that year, and did something also to commemorate that jubilee year of our most gracious and beloved Queen, who has reigned so prosperously and nobly over us for fifty years. And here I must explain that the position the photographer has to take does not bring out the background as distinctly as the front, yet they were as distinct in the bed. This arises from the angle he has to look from. Todo it properly he would have to look perpendicularly up on it. The angle dwarfs the crown and mars its distinctness and shortens the letters, and runs then closer together than they really were. They were as full and distinct as the front ones are in the bed. The crown is of Alternanthera, Aurea Nana Compacta; the year “‘ 1887 ”~ 52 and “Jubilee” is Alternanthera Parychoides Major; “of Our,” of Golden Feather ; * Queen,” of Echeveria Secunda Glanca. These are surrounded by a line of Pachyphitum Bractosum. The filling in is Sedum Acre. The outer border is Salvia Officinalis, filled in with portulacca; between this and the other line is studded through with the tall growing Echeveria Mataelica and several sorts of the dwarfer growing agaves and yuceas. The outer verge is grass, for being a point where two walks diverge, is has formed somewhat an irregular bed which is not easily filled. And here is another (See Plate IT. fig. a) that appeared the first year that our pres- ent and much esteemed Governor, Lard Lansdowne, arrived in Canada, and who has always taken a lively interest in horticulture. The words ‘“ Virtute non verbis” being his motto the beehive and bees part of his crest. That summer was cold and did not bring out the tropical plants as bold as they might have been had it been warmer. The motto is of Alternanthera Amonea, the one [ used before I got the newer one, viz., Pary- choides ; the body of the bees are of a darker colored one ; the wings Leucophyton Brownii ; the two yellow figures are surrounded by Golden Thyme, filled in the centre with Oxalsi Tripeoloides, the side figures are surrounded by Alternanthera, filled in with Echeveria Secunda Glauca. The outer border is Salvia Officinalis, the remaining portion of the bed is carpeted with Sedum Acre. And although those two are sufficient to show you this sort of work, yet for fear you might think me remiss and forgetful, I will show you another (See Plate II. fig. b) which was the best I could do for Lady Lansdowne. Her family name is Abercorn, and the crest is too intricate to be brought out in a bed, so I put the nearest substitute I could think of ; and a portion of that crest being an oak tree I used only the acorn. This bed is composed also of plants which I have enumerated above. And now I will take up what I call the medium class of bedding plants, which I have said can be worked in conjunction with others, but better separately, for such devices as I have shown. They will not bear trimming by the shears, as the former do to keep them close and neat. The knife is the instrament you must use on them on account of their larger leaves and coarser stems, which gives them a bad appearance unless they are kept uniform and in shape. First, then, I will take the Coleus or Foliage plant, as it is called. Natives of Africa and Asia, they well deserve the name of foliage plant, for there is no other plant that I know that shows such a diversity of colors in leaves and shapes as they do; yet as a bedder their value is much enhanced by not standing the sun. The hothouse is the place to develop them in perfection and*bring out their gorgeous colors. Ina shady position there are a good many that do fairly well, but in the bright sun there are onl a few such, as Vershaffelti, a dark color ; Firebrand, of a flame color, and Golden Bedder. However, there are others that will do tolerably well and make a fair appearance in a warm, shady, sheltered bed, where the wind does not toss them about, they will give considerable satisfaction and pleasure. It isa pity those plants are not more useful for bedding, as nothing is so easily multiplied by buttings as they are. Achryanthus differs from the Coleus in that they require an open sunny position to bring out their colors, and will do well in any place where they have this. It is hard to say what varieties amongst several is the best. The dark colors answer certain purposes, but the ones I favor most are Leudenii and Emersonii. The first has smaller leaves than the other, is a more upright grower, and of a darker shade of color, being of reddish brown; Emersonii is of a much lower, rather straggly growth, with quite large leaves, and when young is a very bright red, very impressive and pretty. There are lighter varieties of this plant, but I never could use them with any satisfaction. They are easy of propagation ; a few stocky plants, ora box of cuttings taken in the fall, before frost comes, will give you any quantity in spring. They require also trimming with the knife, and are a most useful plant in many positions. I will now turn to some of the most useful of the light colored plants, which are fit associates for the former. Centawreas, a very extensive genus; some of them tall growing; but I shall only select two of them that are the most useful in beds, viz., Gymnocarpa and Candidissima. Their leaves are covered over with a white, downy y ena) ook Hayy (4 NI ti Ni a ay EN yd) NA Mt iW Cte A 5 See page (2) ig. EF ATE II. PL ’ ‘ = - ; ry ‘Cone { f - . , : i ia + ‘ . WJ } - oo I ; * { id ‘ ‘ it sé - é it ' *syi ‘ r wali Wn : ny - *g + ¢ 7 ' ; i d ’ “ & - ‘ ‘ : 2 n HP See 9 ail 2 é Vv a0 . { > ‘ a « \ , ; F ’ = : . e ' ‘ - me ‘ is - , 2 v i : ‘ “ < t hus > 2 Ms P ’ t ‘ ‘ P he ‘ t ' ; 7 i » * 4 P / , « a a ee - . + : at ‘ + x ‘ - =* \ - : : A » 5 * rt ," Foal a Mie hart ele & <) b> in ae . ~ nl : q | : ' ; ee ¥ Jaks Tira ere 7 . i . . a a . - +s sie sch At -~ eto ‘ > - pi amens s og ’ M TAL Paoli » = § = y . r . ’ * . * son % LA . veh Ne Bre 2 Fig. 6. See page 52. PuateE II. 53 substance, which gives them a most interesting appearance. Gymnocarpa is a close, bushy grower, different from the other, which is more upright and not so compact, and therefore not so effective as the other. They are perennials and not hardy. [ never think of saving over the plants, as they are easily raised from seed, and thus make much the nicest plants. They are natives of the Levant. Cineraria maritima much resembles the Centaureas with its downy leaves. It is perennial, but so easily raised from seed that no one would think of growing it from cuttings. Lantolinas are tender perennials from the south of Europe, which grow into large bushes if allowed to do so, but are most accommodating. They can be clipped and kept to any height or form that you please. Plants may be allowed to grow quite tall, and trimmed almost into any shape you wish, and make an unusual ornament amongst other plants. Its propagation is by cuttings taken off in the fall, or from stock plants in the spring, but require to be taken early to get nice strong plants; its color may be called a light green. I will now add to this section a new white-leaved geranium, Mdme. Sollerii, which promises to throw all the other white-leaved varieties into the shade when used for foliage only. I never have seen it flower, although I have used hundreds of plants of it and given it every chance todoso. ‘The leaves are not as large, nor probably show so much white around their margin as some of the others do, but a large number of leaves are altogether white, which adds much toits appearance. It differs in manner of growth from any other geranium I have ever seen. Instead of throwing up one stem, I have counted as many as fourteen from one plant arising from the ground; that is to say, if you strike a single stem it will at once throw out stems all around it, and form a compact round bush. Many of those stems are rooted so that you can pull a plant to pieces and have many plants. It is a vigorous grower and accommodates itself to almost any condition, giving it additional favorable points over the other white-leaved sorts. Bronze geraniums look particularly well in a bed when you take those that stand the sun best, such as Marshal McMahon, King of the Bronzes, and many others, but come out best in partial shade. This new one, Mdme. Sollerii, makes a splendid associate with them in the same bed, and can be used in many forms. Of their propagation little need be said. I never save the old plants, but take off quantities of cuttings and box them up in sand. There they stand and are well rooted by February, then pot them off into small pots, where they remain until wanted. A box three feet long and one wide will hold a hundred and fifty cuttings. This is the size I make al] boxes for cuttings, but the more important part is the depth. There should be no more than three inches of sand in them, so as to secure them from damping off; and as many of the cuttings are young and tender this is a good safeguard. And now I will take the tall growing plants. They are of all the worst to define, there is such a varied class of them that can be used in a bed. The great difficulty with them is their proper position. This isa part that requires considerable practice, | shall not attempt to deal with more than one bed, and one that is often seen. We shall suppose it a round bed the simplest and easiest to fill and such as anyone can reach. - Center your bed with one or more plants of Ricinus or castor oil bean according to the size of your bed. Then outside of’ this put a line or two of Cannas. Avoid any intri- cate design with this sort of plants as you cannot cut and trim them in, all you can do. is stake them into line. Then put a band of Caladium Esculentum. These two plants are most convenient as their roots are best stored away in a cellar until spring. The first is an annual and such as any one can raise in a window if they have not better facilities. You can now fill out the remainder of your bed by any of the medium grow- ing plants I have enumerated, only observing the contrast of colors. In Cannas, there is one which I would recommend any one to get, viz: Chernanii. The flowers on this one are very large and fine. Although the Gladioli cannot be classed as bedding plants, yet I cannot refrain from calling your attention toa new strain of them, Lemoines’ hybrid spotted; they are quite distinct from the others with a rich vivid orchid like coloring. The blotch is the striking feature of the flower. There 54 ——— ————— —— is a great variety of them and they are said to be mnch hardier than the others, any one getting these cannot fail to be delighted with them. This brilliant and remarkable class of Gladioli originated with Mr. Lemoine, in Franee. Now I shall take flowering plants. Some of them can be used in many ways and carry out beautiful designs ; but no plant should be used in a bed that does not flower a long time. Our seasons are too short to admit of refilling as those in more favoured climates do. Once filled they should stand the season through ; plants whose flowers are of short duration should have their position in borders where their place is not so con- Spicuously seen when they fail. Of flowering plants our annuai Phlox Drommondi may be said to take the lead. I know of no plant that can exceed this, both in mass of bloom and duration. The more compact and newer sorts such as Snowball, Fireball and Rosea, are so tractable that you can make various designs out of them and they are so varied in colors that they make a splendid mass bed. People should always buy them in seperate colors, in order that you may place them in many different positions that will be attractive. Much can be done to keep them in any shape you desire by short stakes run around the outside of them and a string run along them to keep them in shape, as trimming cannot be resortsd to with flowered plants. Ageratun, such as Copes’ Gem and White Cap makesa splendid associate with Phlox Drommondi, but requires to be kept on the outer side as it isdwarfer. You can have the red, white and blue, in all its glory, or other devices. And here I show you the prepara- tion I make for such beds which I shall allude to afterwards. Ageratums can be raised from seed but the surest way is to keep a few stock plants and if those plants are cut close back in the spring and put in a hotbed they will give you hundreds of plants, as they strike almost in a few days. provided the young tender shoots are taken. Although small when put out they soon grow. Seed beds are very apt to vary in height, in fact you are not sure of their height in this way. The Single Scarlet Geraniums I suppose may be called the next to Phloxes fora bright dazzling show ; what variety of them is best for bedding purposes it would be hard to decide. I have a seedling which, by permission, I call Lord Lansdowne, that I prefer to any I have tried. Persons looking at a bed of it when in full bloom, with the sun shining on it, had to turn their eyes from it, so bright was the glare. General Grant is in great favor with many and some like the old Black Dwarf. To these can be added pinks and other colors, for the sake of variety, but properly speaking geraniums are more for massing than for any other purpose. They are always the better of some border around them. Tagates pimula, yellow, is neat and its fine cut foliage completely studded over with its yellow flowers make a fine contrast, or even a line of Achryanthus Lendenii, although of a reddish color, looks well. Asters from their many distinct colors can be placed in a bed if the colors are kept separate so as to work out some simple design, but they require to be planted closely for this purpose, so as to cover the ground completely. There have-been several new varieties of them, introduced within this last few years, and ‘@mongst them is the Zirinzibell, pure white to say the least of it it far exceeds the other older asters in its purity of white and compactness of its flowers. There are several Other sorts of this strain which come well up to them. Massing plants are perhaps the best for generai purposes and I will take a few of the more prominent of them, such as Zinnias. The great improvement that has been made in them is seen in the newer strain of Henderson’s Zebrina, the flowers of which are produced in great profusion, and so varied and beautifully marked that any description that I can give could not properly describe them. Double Geraniums I cannot omit ; they always make a nice mixed bed if the plants are from young stock, raised in the spring and strong enough when put out. They will not give a distant show, but are always pleasant to look at. There are so many new varieties of them now a days that it would be hard to choose from them and I shall not ‘attempt to name any of them. Coxcombs are not classed in general as bedding plants, but I was so much struck by #eeing them put by chance in a bed, that I thought I would try them, so I made a carpet - ef Centaurra Gymnocaepa and planted scarlet Glasgow prize Coxcombs amongst them ; 55 their scarlet combs peering through the white foliage gave me a bed that every one that gaw seemed to admire. They require a rich soil to bring them out in their beauty. The light colors also make a very pretty bed, but they require a dark ground work to bring them out. Celosia plumosa nana is a new introduction of this class which I tried last year with much satisfaction. [cannot do better than give you the description given in the catalogue in which I saw it mentioned. It grows toa height of from twelve to fifteen inches and about as wide in diameter. Each plant bearing from forty to sixty large golden plums of a golden yellow color, and each spike is composed of from tén to twenty smaller ones so that when the plant is in full bloom it is one mass of golden yellow. This is no exaggeration and it lasts a long time in bloom. It is bound to take & prominent place amongst bedding plants in many forms. Petunias are an old time tried bedder, and for a mass I know of no other plant that will give a better show than they will. They are thrown somewhat in the background because they are seen so often, but they still add variety and if bordered around with some stiff growing plant they make a good bed. The newer fringed varieties of the single are very pretty, and the double fringed are extremely fine, but no use in a bed. Verbenas were always considered a good bedder and the new large flowering varie- ties are certainly far ahead of the old ones; their flowers and trusses being much larger and their colors very fine. They should never be planted on dry hot soil, as in such a position they will soon rust and become unsightly. Pansies have always been favourites, but are rather classed as spring and fall flower ing plants ; they never do much during warm weather ; they must be planted in a cool and shady place. The newer varieties such as White's American strain, Henderson’s Butterfly, and Trimandeaus are great acquisitions. Impatiens Sultani is a perennial balsam. It is a plant that may be said is never out of bloom. Plants of it will in the greenhouse flower all winter through, and outside it will flower all summer. Its color is a rosy pink with which it covers itself. It seems to be rather a troublesome plant to keep over in winter; insects seem to have a great love for it, especially the green fly and the mealy bug. It needs constant watching and little water, and as much light as possible. Of its future I cannot say ; it has now been a few years introduced, yet itis not atallcommon. It can be raised from seed, yet even this seems difficult. Tuberous Rooted Begonias are plants that always make a nice bed, and come within the reach of any one. Small bulbs cost little or they can be raised from seed. What makes them a convenient plant is they dry up in winter and can be stored away in any dry warm position, started in spring, and put out, when the weather becomes warm, about the beginning of June and they go on growing at once. Lobelias, I should have classed amongst the dwarf growing bedding plants, but owing to their aversion to strong sun, their constitution not bearing it, I have kept them apart. There are annual and perennial varieties of them ; the latter I prefer, they may be raised from seed and in a shady rich bed the two colors, white and blue, make a most pleasing bed. You can make simple designs or bands of these two colors which will flower most of the summer. Portulacca is another annual that I need say little about. Any one-can have a bed of it, but owing to the seed being so fine, great care requires to be taken in sowing and when coming up the plants are liable to damp off, unless light and air is plentifully sup- plied. And there is still another bed which I would call a natural curiosity bed, the Cacti. Every one, almost, will tell you he cannot see any beauty in them. All I can say on this point is that I have for years past had them in different forms, beds and borders ; and in whatever position they were placed in, more people lingered for a longer time around them and examined them, than around any other plants, showing that they created much interest. All the attention they require is a dry warm sunny position ; in any moist shady one they will soon rot off. There are other styles of bedding such as ribbon and pin cushion, the first is for colour as aribbon, the second is an under carpet of some material, with ornamental plants studded all through it ; such as Agaves, Aloes, Yuccas, Palms. Any plant that has an 56 odd or or ornamental foliage can be used in this. I might go on and enumerate many more plants that can be used as bedding plants, but I have now given you the best. adapted to this climate and will leave you with this advise ; always keep a reserve stock of the different sorts as accidents will happen sometimes. Grubs too cut them off, and we might forgive them more readily if the appearance was that they did so for food, but their work seems wanton destruction, cutting them and leaving them there. I am more troubled by a two-legged sort that carries away whole plants and they are an all-season pest, taking them away when the season is far advanced, at a time when it is impossible to make up with some plants. When you put out a design. with flowering plants you are not always sure of the color; by means of this reserve you can take out what does not come true to the color you want and replace them from it. Consider the nature and habit of your plant before you put it out; if they are sun loving plants, give them a sunny position, if shade, give them shade, and if large leafed plants, never put them in an exposed position where the wind will toss and destroy their appearance ; and above all things never commence to fill beds without some forethought. Here is a sample of my manner of preparation. (See Plate III.) During the winter I have the size of each bed, and work to a scale so as to know the space required for each. This gives an idea of quantities that may be required, also, there is a question so frequently asked of me that I will answer here, viz :—“ How do you manage to fill and trim your beds so as that we never see any marks of blemish?’ I use a plank thrown across the beds, raised on blocks at each end for the men to tread on for both purposes. When my bed is smoothly raked I draw my design same way as on paper, the planter following the lines without in any way obliterating them. For this purpose I use a wooden compass about four feet long, . pointed so as it will mark. It is simply two pieces of straight wood attached at the top with a bolt that you can tighten at pleasure. A foot rule is my scale, The compass is also a most useful instrument in borders around curves or any place where lines are wanted. You can draw lines around any figure by following your outer edge with one point and marking with the other. This may seem to many a very troublesome way of doing this. But as yet I never have arrived at anything without trouble, and if you want to be successful in this work you must do it with some system also. Designers have been empioyed to’ give patterns for carpet beds ; this is a mistake, for they Jack a knowledge of the material you have to deal with, both in nature and color, and will give you designs that you cannot properly fill. In making a design the first and most important point is to know what you are going to fill the design with. Nature has given you a very limited amount of material and color to do this work with and you cannot but abide by it. Rules are laid down for the proper blending of color ; here we can only contrast lighter and darker shades and do the best with what we have. And before closing my remarks I must say that I am sorry that many parks still cling far too much to foliage plants. They are very pretty and more enduring than flowering plants; but I shall hope to soon see the day when many of our old familiar flowering plants shall again be seen side by side with them. Let us encourage in every way we can any one that has a patch of ground to have a bed of flowers. It gives cheerfulness to the location and is a healthful and pleasant past- time to those who attend them. If you have a friend sick pull some of them and take to him. The heart will be very hard that is not melted by them. I cannot help here add- ing a short extract from some paper which says: “Show me a person that loves flowers and I will show you one that has a warm heart gushing forth joy and pleasure to all around. It may be hid; but it is like the flinty rock which when broken open, has gems within that sparkles and dazzles the eye. Do not pass through this world as if it were made for you and you only. Do all in your power by decorating your homes to not only give pleasure to yourselves but also to making those that surround you happy. 17 AY Searlet Phlox. White Phlox. Puate ILI. See page 56. Ee ee ee ee WOMEN IN HORTIOULTURE. The following paper, by Mrs. Annie L, Jack, was next read to the Association : In ruder times it was the custom for women to do the heavy agricultural work on the farm, while her lord and master was off in the woods for game to furnish the meat and clothing they required. In later years during the early settlement of America we read of women still helping in the fields, generally a labor of love to lighten the burden of the men who were dear to them; but as refinement and indoor life gave our sex more home duties, the idea took hold of many minds that it was a sign of coarseness and vulgarity to be seen at outdoor labor, and many country people foster this sentiment in their children. Phylis will go cheerfully down into the home cellar and cut potatoes all day for planting, but affects ignorance of methods of planting and cultivation of the vegetable as soon as it goes out of doors, and I remember once a country bred girl, who after a year or two at a city school where she studied botany, asked me “if those green things were strawberries?” while close enough to see, that they were well grown specimens of solanum tuberosum. If the work of women in the growing of plants, fruits and flowers could be elevated to a science instead of being considered degrading these crude ideas would die out, and women could take their place in this as well as any other department of the world’s great work. lt is true some would-be delicate people may denounce you as strong and the sun browned face and hands may not be so attractive to society people, but after all these are thinor things and we can learn to pity those who never know ‘“‘the glad creative skill, the joys of they who toil with God.” Among all the professions now open to women, that of horticulture presents many attractions that no other life can give. Surrounded by the best gifts of nature she can appreciate and enjoy this work, and it is a pity that among so many institutions of learning none has yet been endowed to teach our daughters all the important departments of horticulture. The cultivation of fruits and flowers form a large part of the refinements of life, and the work of grafting, budding, prun- ing, tying up grapes, and harvesting the fruits of vine and orchard can be done by our sex in competition with the stronger man, who ursurp these tasks. Our florist usually employ girls to make up designs and boquets, their deft fingers, and good taste, having a natural tendency to happy combinations, and in the pretty garden plots of most of our homes, it is the woman’s hand that makes such gardens of beauty. A prominent lady florist in Cleveland, Ohio, began by propagating plants in her home and selling them to her friends, with this money she bought the cast-off sashes of an old greenhouse and some of the lumber and bricks, and by the help of a carpenter and her brother built a small greenhouse 11x18, doing the glazing herself. She was $100 in debt when it was finished, but paid it all the first spring by the sale of plants, and going on with patient preseverance and skillful labor she is now recognized as one of the leading florists of that city. Many women have earned pocket money, and some a competence by growing straw- berries and other small fruits, such labor being light enough for woman’s strength. The growing of herbs too is sometimes carried on by women, and when done with system is quite profitable and pleasant employment. Vegetables as a rule are heavier and not so easy to market, but I remember still the pleasure I experienced one winter in $150 pocket money that was mine, from sales of celery. There had been a wash-out in the low lying lands about the city, that doubled the usual prices, and although mine was not very large, being a second crop on the ground, it was of the best quality and met ready market. Many successful fruit growers can tell their experience, but success does not come always without failures, any more than with men, though close application to business will bring equal profit to either. Health and independence is to be found amid such work, and for country girls, there is certainly an opening that should be more alluring than the factory and workshop, and it isa pity that some practical method cannot be devised of teaching this branch of the business to promising students. The natural sciences, especially botany and entomology are necessary, the latter being indispensable in order to know our 58 insect enemies and how to destroy them, for it needs constant and watchful care, as well as the practical labor to keep depredators from our plants, and I would here suggest that the study of insects be on the list of books in our public schools. Professor Saunders has contributed a valuable work on the “ Insects injurious to our fruits,” that ought to be in the hands of every girl and boy student, for it teaches us how to fight with our foes and to distinguish our friends in the insect world, and this would be one step toward a knowledge of horticulture. The school-house should be surrounded by plots of flowers that could teach their lessons daily, and the influence would spread and grow among the girls and bovs, to beautify and refine their lives till their aim would be to cause the “desert to rejoice and blossom as the rose.” The SecreTary.—There is a great deal of sense in Miss Jack’s paper, and her remarks about decorating schoolhouse yards. I think we, as a society, ought to take an interest in the children of our country, and in disseminating among them a taste for landscape gardening. We ought to encourage those who have charge of school yards to decorate them, and to plant in them such varieties of shrubs and plants as would educate the children growing up in the best varieties of plants and trees to plant afterwards in their home grounds. Mr. Wricut.—I have had some little experience in that direction, having at one time belonged to the industrious army of teachers. I was very successful in teaching. I educated my own wife in the way she should go, and when I got her in that way I married her. That is one of the plants I brought up to perfection. However, at the ful how easily you can get the children interested in caring for plants. I had not to buy time I was teaching, we had in the school some very fine plants indeed, and it is wonder- any plants ; all that was necessary was to suggest to the children that we would have some nice plants in our window if they would only bring them. When I wanted them taken out of doors, I used to let them take turns in attending to them, and they soon got to look upon these plants as their own, and we had a very fine collection. During the Summer vacation I gave each one a plant to take home and take care of, and they brought them back when we re-opened. J remember on one occasion, one of the boys accidentally knocked one of them down and broke it, and you never saw anyone so sorry as he was in your life. I didn’t scold him, but he commenced to cry right off, and the next day he brought another plant, a finer one, too. This has a wonderfully good influ- ence on children—this fostering a love of the beautiful in them. We, in Ontario, boast of one of the finest systems of public schools in the world, and we have reason to do so, but there is a great deal that might be done in the way of beautifying our school grounds and having flowers in the school-room itself. It does look very bleak and dreary to go to a school and find nothing but the bare building and a barren school yard. We are making progress in this direction every day. In our own village the Horticultural Society gives prizes for the finest specimens of flowers produced and grown in any school in the county. A large number of schools compete for this prize, and the secretary of our Association wrote to Mr. Vick, and that gentleman furnished seed gratuitously to any school that wished to raise flowers to compete. This is a step in advance, and it is won- derful how schools take it up. Before this they had no fence, and the children were told by the teacher that they must have a fence, and the children went to their fathers and got the fence. If the teacher had gone to the trustees it is doubtful if they would have done it, but when their own children went and told how nice it was going to be, they granted it. Prof. Macoun.—Twenty-eight years ago I tried it in Belleville, where I happened to be teaching in one of the board schools. Before I went there, the superintendent, a reverend gentlemann of the Presbyterian body, was nearly afraid to go there on ace unt of the boys pelting him. At that time I was rather younger than I am now, and enthusiastic about the cultivation of flowers. The yard had been run upon by the children for ten or twelve years, and was perfeetly hard. In this yard I made three round beds, and I said: ‘In this bed I am going to have flowers, and [ know these flowers will not be touched by the 59 2 ——d children.” My father had a hot-bed, and I got the flowers from him and I put the plants in the yard, and we had them there by the thousand, and no one ever pulled them, and no one ever got a chance to steal them, for the children, Ten or twelve years after that I opened what is now the Central School in Belleville, and I said: “Now, we are going to have flowers here, not in the yard, but in the house.” By this time flower cultivation had taken hold of the people of Belleville—for Mr. Dempsey can tell you that twenty-eight years ago very few flowers were cultivated in any part of the county— and things were changed. Well, I told my assistants that we were going to decorate that school-room, and we got hanging-baskets all around the room, and the window was filled with flower pots. What was the result? Why, the cultivation of flowers started in Belleville, and we have now in the city of Belleville the finest rows of trees of any city in the Dominion, and it was all the result of my fighting, not to the bitter but to the successfulend. Now, the children never touched the flowers, and, what is more, it is the want of cultivation, or culture I may call it, that makes children caze little about flowers. This is a matter which should be taken up by this Association, and impressed upon the Minister of Public Instruction in Toronto, the Hon. G. W. Ross. Show him the absolute necessity of bringing this thing before the teachers, and not recommending them, but compelling them to bring this mode of culture into the schools. This is not the first time I have talked about this matter in this city, nor do I intend it to be the last, because this matter must be talked up until not only the teachers wake up but the men who put the teachers in their places, and these men must learn that there is a culture about the cultivation of flowers, and having them constantly under the eye, that sur- passes any other culture in this age of the world. I believe, gentlemen, you are the men who can force this matter before the Minister of Education and compel him to see it. Mr. Ross is not a gentleman whose eyes are shut, but like many another Minister, he will do when pushed what he was anxious to do without being pushed. The SecreTary.—It has been a favorite idea of mine for some time to have this thing stirred up in regard to the schools. JI am connected with the High School Board in our village, and have been interested for some time. We want to bring some influ- ence to bear on our school authorities, so that a larger tract of land might be had in connection with all our schools, and that they might all be made the means of educating the children growing up. Let the school yards be not simply play grounds, but means of instruction and education with regard to trees and shrubs as well as flowers. I think it is a mistake where all the trees and shrubs planted in a school yard are of one kind, as we very often see. ‘They should be little arboretums ; collections of the different trees and shrubs which we have in our own country desirable for planting in private grounds ; and the teachers ought to take every opportunity they have of instructing the children of the school in the names of these trees and shrubs, so that they may grow up with some knowledge of this department of horticulture. How many of the people which have grown up in our country are utterly ignorant of the names of the different varieties of trees and shrubs to be found in our woods. It seems to me that this is a matter of great importance, and that we ought to take some means of influencing the Minister of Educa- tion in the manner suggested by Mr. Macoun. Dr. Hurtsurr.—I think this matter should be impressed on both the public, and ‘the school authorities. Mr. Caston.—There is a day set apart for tree planting called Arbor Day. In our section, at the last school meeting, we had opened a new school building with fine grounds, but it had no trees, and some of them spoke about it. I proposed to have all the section school teachers and children turn out on Arbor Day and get a lot of evergreens and deciduous trees, and plant them. Of course this was a step in the right direction, and something more may follow. Mr. Anperson.—With respect to Mr. Wright’s suggestion as to the cultivation of flowers in the schools, especially in high schools, I think it is most required in the rural districts. You will find that in large cities and towns more time is devoted to gardens for fruit, vegetables and flowers than there is out in the country, where you would expect the farmers to be more alive to their own interests in the matter. In any of the pro- vinces you will find that it is the farmers, who have most at stake, who are careless and indifferent. It is lamentable that such should be the case. We want to teach our farmers that their land is worth more to them than they are making out of it, and any- thing that will teach the farmers what a treasure they have in the'little patch behind the back yard, would be an immense benefit to the countay. I think if something could be done to stir up the farmers and show them the actual money value of flower and fruit gardens and vegetable gardens, and the cultivation of forest trees, it would be materially advancing the interests of this country. Mr. Gisp,—When I was travelling in Germany, I noticed one day, at one of the horticultural schools, that there were about four times as many students as the school could hold, and I was told that it was a convention held there every three ycars, and that every school teacher had to go and spend three days at that horticultural college attending lectures on horticulture, and more than that, that he had to plant so many trees every year ; whether that is in his own or the school grounds I cannot tell. It amounts to this, that every teacher there of a certain grade had to have a fair know- . ledge of agriculture. Then, one of the chief methods of teaching horticulture in Europe is to be found in the railway station gardens. Wherever throughout Europe there isa little rail- way station, you will finda nice little garden. In an out-of.the-way place in Russia you will find a beautiful shrubbery around their little station. One thing that has worked very well here as an incentive to children to study up trees, is prizes for collections of leaves. We have found that work admirably. No one can collect specimens without studying up the trees, and we have had capital collections from the youngsters, some of whom know all] the native trees and some of the foreign ones too. Mr. Dempsey.—I believe I am a farmer. I am sorry I am not a school-teacher, but unfortunately I never was, and we farmers have not had the privileges of these beautiful schcol-houses. Now, I have to say that, in our part of the country at least, every farmer grows vegetables—every one of them. My friend Professor Macoun can tell you they grow vegetables, and good ones too. I can assure you that farming is not at all a disgraceful profession with us, and if the gentleman who thinks we don’t grow vegetables will come up there, we will show him some as good specimens as he ever saw in his life. SECOND DAY. On reassembling on Thursday morning the proceedings were resumed by opening the Question Drawer, in which were found the questions on which the following$discussions are based : FERTILIZERS FOR APPLE TREES. Qurstion.—Is there any fertilizer better for the apple tree than ordinary barnyard manure ? Mr. Bropie.—Last spring I applied to one-half of my orchard hardwood ashes, about half a bushel to each tree, and to the remainder of the orchard I applied the ordi- nary barnyard manure the fall previous. On the part of the orchard to which I had applied the barnyard manure the apples were wormy—about one-third of them were wormy—which looks as if the manure had been a harbor for the insects; while the apples on that part where the ashes were applied were well colored, and not a spot at all on them. nortan Professor SAuNDERS.—What quantity of ashes ? = Mr. Bropiz.—Just according to the size of the trees. I had a man going around with one of these coal sifters, and we sifted them around just as far as the branches ex- tended. ; Mr. Dempsey.—Mr. Brodie’s sentiments just about speak the whole of it. I never found any better fertilizer for apple trees than hardwood ashes yet, but still occasionally a little manure or green clover turned in we find very advantageous. The way we have 61 been using clover is by sowing a crop incorn. We plant corn in the orchard, and after hoeing it the last time we sow clover thickly, and in our part of the country, something like here in Ottawa, the snow lies on the ground pretty well, and the clover about June will be in blossom. When it comes in blossom we commence to turn it under with a chain on the plow, and in every third furrow we drop a row of potatoes. That is the way we get our strong growths of potatoes. There is no trouble, and we never fail to have crops on that principle. We use fertilizers for the corn first, then we use the clover for the potato, and I find that we get beautiful apples where we do this—fine crops on the trees and the trees themselves healthy. Mr. Hamitton.—An exception should be made of young trees, which are better manured with stable manure, It certainly grows better, but after they have reached a certain growth and begin to bear the stable manure might be dropped or used in a less quantity and more ashes. I think young trees are improved by the application of well rotted stable manure, while bearing trees would be the better of ashes. Mr. Bropim.—My experience of manuring in garden soil is that where we manure at the rate of fifty or sixty tons to the acre, we make too much growth in wood. It is only trees like the Duchess that we can afford to manure. My Fameuse made such a growth of wood that I had no crop at all; I took off two crops of hay, and then they began bearing. A Memper.—How often do you apply the ashes? Is it every year, or only now and again? I know that in grape growing I have killed some of my plants by applying them too often. Mr. Bropiz.—Only apply once a year, and it is according to the size of the tree ; if the tree is large, half a bushel; if small, less. Every year as soon as the snow is off the round. - The Prestpent.—No doubt it would depend a good deal upon the soil itself, a light sandy loam would take a good deal more ashes than a sandy soil. Mr. Dempsry.—I will just give you a little result of some of my own experience with manure applied to an apple orchard. In the first place, there is a very great differ- ence in the value of stable manure dependent upon the food of the animal. If an animal is highly fed one load of manure is worth perhaps ten or fifteen where they are only just kept on straw, hence there is very little danger in using stable manure if your animals are kept all on straw, but if the animals which produce the manure are highly fed the trees are sometimes forced to such a rapid growth that I have known a whole block of new apple trees to be destroyed in one season just from the forcing of the growth from stable manure. In applying ashes whether it is a large or a small tree does not make any difference in the quantity; because you spread it evenly over the whole of the soil. Under all circumstances I find that cultivation is worth more than all the fertilizers we ean use. I have land on which I used no fertilizers whatever for ten years, but culti- vated the soil well, and we invariably got a good growth of trees without any fertilizer. Then, again, I have tried to grow apples without cultivating the soil ; we had a block of trees of a few acres which we did not cultivate this past year, neither did we take any- thing from the soil, but we did apply some ashes. The season was exceedingly dry. Just - beside us was the piece of land we took the heavy crop off, and on the spot that we culti- vated and took the potatoes off or other vegetables we took off one acre as many apples of the first quality as from ten of the others. Mr. MircHEtyt.—I am not an apple grower, but I would like to say a word on this question. As to wood ashes, I am not enough of a chemist to know what it really does as a fertilizer, but I have used ashes from our mill to a considerable extent on plants of different kinds, and I cannot say that I feel to-day that it does a great deal as a real fer- tilizer, but I think that it keeps down many of the aphides, of which there are more working at the roots of our plants than perhaps we have any idea of. Take up a plant of almost any kind carefully, and particularly in dry seasons, you will often find the aphides working there. J think these aphides which infest the roots would rather be somewhere else than where there are ashes in the soil. My experience is that we do more good with ashes in that way than anything else. These aphides are getting to be a very serious pest, and I think the application of ashes has the effect of preventing their ravages to a 62 _———————————— a nn nn ane very great extent, but, as I said before, I can hardly say I believe ashes as a real fertil- izer amount to very much. Mr. SHEPHERD (Montreal Horticultural Society).—I have used large quantities of ashes, one hundred or a hundred and fifty barrels a year; mixed wood and soft wood ashes. I have killed a great many trees by applying too great a quantity of ashes. I do not approve of Mr. Hamilton’s idea of forcing young trees, particularly the Fameuse, to make a great growth, not in the Province of Quebec at least, where the climate is not such as to permit of a great growth safely, because it does not ripen the wood sufficiently. Out of three hundred trees set out in 1879 I lost about 25 per cent, and I attribute that loss to the fact that they were forced too much the first four or five years, that they didn’t mature their wood. I keep most of my orchard in sod and grass, and we apply the ashes between the rows of trees; the man goes down with a cart full of ashes and sprinkles them as the horse walks along. We don’t spread the ashes under the trees, but between the rows. I think one certain benefit of their application is that the color of the fruit is very much improved, particularly on sandy or gravelly soil. I have noticed the year after the application of the ashes that the color of the fruit has been very much improved by it. Prof. SaunpERs.—I think Mr. Mitchell has struck only half the truth in his remarks though there is a great deal in what he says. Alkaline applications are no doubt effica- cious where there are soft bodied insects like the aphis, which are readily destroyed by them, but to ignore the usefulness of wood ashes as a manure is going contrary to the ex- perience of the whole world. We know that potash is a most import element in the con- stitution of all plants and trees, and cannot be replaced by anything else, and where that element in the soil has become exhausted you have deficient fertility, and the fruit, flowers, or whatever you may grow, will be of an inferior quality, and it becomes a neces- sity in some way or other to restore this important element to the soil as a fertilizer. The knowledge which we at present have of the chemical constituents of our fruit trees is so limited that it is not possible to speak positively as to what preparation of this impor- tant substance should be added to the soil, and the character of the soil itself also modi- fies the importance of the use of a substance of that sort. With regard to the apple itself, we have had analyses made of the apple several times, but I am not aware that any analysis of the wood or leaf has ever been made in such a way as to give us the manurial constituents which enter into the tree. That is a class of work we hope to take up at the Experimental Farm as soon as we can, not only analyzing the fruit of the tree, but the wood and leaves and roots of the tree, so as to ascertain what are the constituents drawn from the soil. When that is done we shall probably be able to give some useful sugges- tions as to what should be added to the soil where it has been cropped annually for a long period with the same product, as in the case of theapple. I think the present dis- cussion a most import one, but I would not like it to go abroad that ashes are not a good fertilizer, because I am sure it would not be a correct conclusion. Mr. Bropie.—Is not there a certain percentage of phosphoric acid in ashes ? Prof. SaunDERS.—Yes, and some iron, and very fine proportions of other salts and lime. It depends very much upon the character of the wood. Different trees yield ashes with different constituents; some are richer in potash than others, and some richer in other ingredients. Dr. Hurtpurt.—We almost always cultivated, about three-quarters of our orchard ; sometimes potatoes, sometimes corn, and there was very seldom any fertilizers used under the trees, though sometimes some barnyard manure was scattered over the ground under the trees. These trees where the ground was cutlivated every year grew much more rapidly, and produced much better and more fruit, and the trees lasted longer. We never used any ashes, and I question whether ashes or any fertilizer of that kind can be permanently used to advantage. We know that a great part of the substance of the tree comes from the air. When I say a great part I mean almost the entire substance. Of course there are many elements taken through the roots, but the chief thing to be taken into account in manures is to loosen the soil and allow the roots to run freely into it. It is very possible that sometimes these manurial substances put upon the soil may quicken the growth, but I question very much whether permanently they do so. I think 63 an experiment of that kind which has lasted over a great many years in my recollection would be of great importance, unless some experiments show tothe contrary. The under- lying soil of these trees was a silurian limestone. A gentleman who spoke here yesterday in reference to the soil around the St. Lawrence, said he could grow profitably only on some gravelly ridges where he has tried upon the limestone. I don’t know but what some of these limestones are very compact, and will not allow the roots to penetrate. In other places forest trees as well as apple trees will grow, where the rocks do not lie close together, and among the crevices down I have found the roots five feet below—you know the soil under these limestone rocks is a very rich, black mould—running between these rocks, and the trees would flourish almost better perhaps than on any other soil. At all events that is my experience. HORTICULTURE IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS. QueEstion.—Will the President please have a resolution passed embodying the pur port of Prof. Macoun’s remarks last evening, requesting the Minister of Education to take steps towards the introduction of horticulture in the public schools, The Secrerary.—This is a very important subject, though we have not time to discuss it at present. I think it would be rather superfluous to have it taught in the schools as a lesson, the children having already so many lessons to occupy their attention. But if in some way it can be made a recreation in connection with the schools I believe it can very successfully be brought into the course. If every teacher had the requ site practical knowledge be could by these arbor days and during recess, perhaps, and at other times, take the children out in the school yard and give them a few little practical lessons in a way that would be a pleasure to every scholar rather than a matter of study, and thus make them practically interested in it. If every school yard in our Province could be made a little arboretum, if the play ground could be made a little larger than was necessary, and a part set aside for a collection of flowers and shrubs and trees of the country, not more than one or two of each variety, and if every first-class teacher were compelled to be sufficiently versed in these subjects to impart the requisite information, I believe a great deal might be done to disseminate information in this respect. I would express my views in this way, and put it as a motion perhaps before the Association, in order to bring it up in some definite shape. But first of all let me say we were studying how we could disseminate among the farmers a spirit which would effect an improvement in their yards. We want practical illustrations, because they will learn faster that way than in any other, and we must make the school yards the illustration as far as possible. I would move the following resolution,—‘‘ Having in view the great importance of a more extended knowledge of horticulture in our country, this Association recommends to the Minister of Education the consideration of the wisdom of encouraging the study of horticulture in connection with our public and high schools, both by making it obligatory on first-class teachers after a certain length of time to take a short course of instruction at the Agricultural College, Guelph, and by making each school yard an arboretum of native trees and shrubs properly arranged and labeled.” Mr. MircHety.—I have great pleasure in seconding the resolution. We have got too much in the habit of regarding our public school children as a horde of little vandals, who destroy everything they can lay their hands upon. I know in my own district in some of the schools we have little plots laid out, and they do not destroy them but take good care of them. With public school scholars or anyone else when certain results are looked for from them they are pretty sure to follow, but if they see that people place confidence in them, whether little or big, they generally try to deserve that confidence. Mr. Wuyte.—About two years ago I was requested by the Inspector here to give lessons in botany in the school, and the pupils were given a portion of the school yard which was fenced in by the board. I can say that I thinkit hada remarkably good effect on the pupils; instead of neglecting or destroying the plants they got, they took the most particular care of them, and they were continually doing all they could to 64 beautify the garden? I understood that afterwards a great many of them carried them home and cultivated plants in their own houses. I certainly think a great dea: of good may be effected in the manner suggested. The resolution was unanimously carried. BEST VARIETY OF PLUMS FOR THE OTTAWA VALLEY. The next subject for discussion according to the programme was entitled as above, and the discussion was opened as follows : Mr. GREENFIELD (Ottawa).—I have tried a great many different sort of plums. Pond’s Seedling bears for a year or two, and then dies out. JI have Glass’ Seedling, © which will sear five or six years; I have got very good crops from it, but, like all the rest of the best plums, it will not stand the climate. I have tried a great many ; I have got some in flower, but as soon as they come to bearing order they die out. Glass’ Seedling I find is beginning too; it is a kind of disease underneath the bark, and where it has taken the disease under the bark I cut the bark all away, and when I do that I find a kind of white scum between the bark and the wood, which I cut away, and then paint it with strong turpentine and paint. I found that preserved the tree for some two or three years, but it went at last. I have a seedling coming now from which I hope to rear some good ones, but as to trying our best plums here it is almost labor in vain, for they will not stand the climate. I have tried them on all kinds of soil, and now I am cutting them'down in the Russian fashion to see if I can grow them that way, and some of them are looking very well. I have had the Orleans, white and blue, one we have imported from Quebec, but they only stand a few years; they will not stand the climate any length of time. I would not advise anyone to rear any plums here, unless they are reared in the bough. I think I have about a couple now reared by our seedling from the Glass’ Seedling and the Pond’s Seedling. I may have some bearing in a short time, but I don’t intend to raise any more. A Memper.—Have you ever had the Weaver Plum? Mr. GREENFIELD.—No, I never had it, but I got a great many from Mr. Leslie of Toronto about ten years ago; I got the best and hardiest plums, that I thought would stand the climate, but they all died out. Mr. SHEPHERD.—Have any of your seedling plums borne fruit ? Mr. GREENFIELD.—The Glass’ Seedling is not bearing yet, but the leaf shows very good quality and strong wood, but I find if you get them from too strong ground they make too much wood and won’t stand the climate. I find the best ground you can put them on is cold, heavy clay soil, but it does not do to put them on too strong soil, for they make too much wood. A Memsper.—All the red plums have shrivelled up very badly—become spotted and shrivelled up and large quantities destroyed in many instances. In my own garden we had only two or three that escaped, I would like to know if any remedy can be devised? Prof. SaunpErs.—Did it occur previous to last year ? The Memper.—It began about four or five years ago, and it seems to be getting ‘worse. Prof. SAunpErs.—Did the trees lose their foliage ? The Memper.—No. Prof. SAunpErs.—I know that in the west they would shrivel sometimes in an exceptionally dry year, but I am afraid I cannot throw any light on the subject. The MempBer.—I thought it might be owing to the dryness of the season, but although I watered the trees copiously for some time it didn’t seem to make any difference. Mr. Wuyter.—I fully agree with Mr. Greenfield on the folly of spending money on grafted plums, for none of the ordinary plums grown in the west will succeed here. I tried it some years ago, and the growth is very rapid, but they all died out. Since then 65 -we have got some plums of our own by selecting the best seedlings, which are very good ; I have two or three trees quite as good, I think, as most of the western varieties—-that is for preserving. They never shrivel or drop or give any trouble of that kind, and they are quite as large as the Black Ball. All our seedling plums are a yellowish red or — dark red. I am quite sure there is no use in trying to graft plums in this part of the country. The SecreTARY.—During last summer Mr. W. H. Wylie of Carleton Place sent up to mea small basket of seedlings, which I think are worthy of notice. He also sent me a few shoots or sprouts which I have planted, and some of them are growing, so I shall have an opportunity of testing them. It is a large, red, native seedling, which has been in his family for a long time, and they have found it far superior to any other plum in that locality. Mr. Hamitton.—I have tried plums, and they have failed, but I have had very good success with the De Soto. A tree planted three years ago last year produced a gallon of very large, fine plums. In regard to the sul ject of plum growing generally, I was down in New Brunswick a few years ago—I think it was four years ago—and I saw a very large plum orchard, and the plums were of a sort which it was generally considered im- possible to grow. There was the Green Gage, the Washington and some others, and to say that I was astonished would be putting it very mildly. 1 was down there in winter, and saw something of the method of treating the plum tree in winter. The gentleman who grew them told me that he spread out the roots to the east and west in planting them, and put none to the north and south. Then in winter he would take a shovel of earth from the south side, and bend the tree down to the south. I saw a tree trampled down in that position. He told me that by that means he had large crops every year, and plums nearly all of the best. Now, that may not be due altogether to the winter protection ; [ think these plums were planted pretty closely, and I think the ground was shaded. He told me also that the soil was not disturbed—was not cultivated, and that also, I think has something to do with it. I think the bending down prevents the fiuit bud from being injured in winter, and the close planting tends to preserve the trees and make them productive. Prof. Saunpers.—Is that orchard protected by a hillside ? Mr. Hamwiutron.—I think they were grown on a northern exposure. Mr. Bucxe.—I have grown a good many cultivated plums, and have not so far suc- ceeded very well except with Pond’s Seedling and Glass’ Seedling. But the Pond’s Seedling is a very shy bearer, and the Glass’ Seedling, though grown a number of years, I have had but very few plums from. The tree is hardy, but the fruit spurs are not hardy, and, like Mr. Whyte, I have had to fall back on the natives. Moore’s Arctic, about which we hear so much, is no better than the rest of them here. The Weaver is very hardy here, but the plum is very inferior compared with the wild plums, raised here. The great difficulty with the wild red plum is that the stone is too large ; if we could get it with a smaller stone I think we would have a satisfactory plum. The plums grown in the Ottawa Valley are very superior to those grown in Minnesota. I have seen a number of Minnesota plums, and they cannot begin to compare with those grown in the Ottawa Valley. I think if we makea collection of some of these plums we are talking about as we are going to do with the seedling apples it will be a great benefit to northern Canada, and perhaps to some of the southern parts of it, where people may perhaps be very glad to growthem. They crop very heavily, are very hardy, and the flavor of some of them is very good. The Orleans plum, brought from the Island of Orleans, is not at all hardy in the Ottawa Valley. I don’t know why that is, as the Island of Orleans, as everyone knows, is below Montreal. _ Dr. Hutsurt.—I had a few years’ experience in growing plums here, but succeeded with none but the native yellow plum. It is very different from the red plum in the west—a larger and better plum. The trees grew very rapidly, and bore profusely, so much so that the limbs were almost broken down year after year, and the plums, which were large and yellow, were very luscious. I remember a tree, the largest yellow plum tree I ever saw in my father’s orchard, which I always understood was a native. The trunk of the tree grew about as high as a man’s head before the limbs went out, and the 5 (F.G.) hod branches spread further, and it was a larger tree than most apple trees. I think a foot or two above the ground it was fourteen or fifteen inches in diameter, and the plum was very large. I got down a plum that I used to grow in Hamilton, but it died, and I then got some from the eastern townships, but they died the same. I think these native yellow plums here are well worth cultivatioa, I think they would give very good results, and the tree is as hardy as our forest trees here. Mr. Wuyre.—I would not like the members of the Association to think that these stones are all so big here, there are some that are small. They are a very good plum indeed, and lots have a very small stone. Mr. Gir (Abbotsford, P. Q.).—My first efforts proved failures ; now I have plums every year. I first planted those kinds which did best in the sheltered city gardens of Montreal. Lombard bore one glorious crop and gradually died. Bradshaw, a few now and then ; so did Coe’s Golden Drop, Quackenbos, Damson, and others. Dictator, Nota Bene, McLaughlin, and many others proved failures. I had a few from the Washington, and then it died ; in fact, I might go over a long list in the same way. Later on I tried several varieties of the Prune Plum of western Europe, but they are not hardy. I have tried the Prunus Simoni of China, it is about as hardy as the Lombard. Then I planted some Russian plums, but I cannot speak of them yet ; they are making slow growth, in fact all my plum trees are making moderate growth ; I have not been forcing them. In the cold belt many have their hearts set on the Russian plum. Let us see what we have. The plums that Mr. Shroeder, of Moscow, has sent to the Iowa Agricultural Ccllege, were received by him from Poltava, where the winter temperature is like that of Hamil- ton. Dy. Regel, of St. Petersburg, has sent out three varieties, from whence obtained he was unable to tell me. The four varieties received from Orel as Orel 19 to 22, are pro- bably the Rothe Lange, Gelbe Lange, Blane Lange and Tchernoslev, and whether of Rus- sian origin or not 1 cannot say. ‘Then we have (thanks also to Prof. Budd) in this country the Moldavka received from Varonesh and some from Riga. The plums of the Volga, I regret to say, are not in this country, and are very difficult to get because they are in the hands of little peasant fruit growers. We therefore have not in this country a good selection of the plums of the cold climate of Russia. In 1873 I planted a number of root grafts I received from Wisconsin, and where the graft failed I allowed the stock to grow. The result was that I had five crops in succes- sion, and a crop nearly each year afterwards. Possibly if I had manured them a little they would have done even better. Some were poor in quality, and some were of good quality for eating and fairly good for cooking, but if you can them, then the astringency in the skin and stone become too strong. Last year I planted for the first time Desoto, which is a decided improvement on these wild plums I have spoken of. Itis a young bearer, and the best in quality of these American plums which I have tested. Another plum that has borne with me is the Miner, of which I have about ten or twelve trees. It ripens about the Ist of October and keeps till 1st November. It is a deep dark red, and has the flavor of a musk melon. It is a light or moderate bearer each year. A plum I have not fruited is the Mooreman, but the stone is very small, and it seemed to me to be free from astringency. I have tasted Wolf and Maquoketa on the College grounds at Ames, Iowa, and I feel that the better varieties of the American plum are the most satisfactory for our colder climates. In regard to the question brought up by Mr. Hamil- ton, if we protect our raspberries why should not we protect our plums? In Central Russia many are planted where the winters are very severe, and they bend them down every winter to the ground. If the trees get too old to be bent down they take their chance. This plan is adopted on a large scale by Mr. F. P. Sharp, of Woodstock, N.B., with Moore’s Arctic. Mr. Bropiz (Montreal).—My experience has been very much like that of Mr, Greenfield. There was a very valuable article in one of our Reports (Reports of Mon- treal H. 8.) by Mr. Spriggins, on growing plums from seed. He sowed the seed, choosing those varieties which hada nice broad leaf, discarding all those with a small leaf and prickly stem, and he has originated some very fine varieties. There is also a Mr. Arnott, of Hochelaga, who has a very fine seedling grown in the same manner. Another gentleman has planted some California plums, and says he has got a very fine seedling 67 i from them. I have the Yellow Egg grown from suckers, and as the tree gets old and dies there are others to replace them, and it is the same with the Green Gage. Mr. Caston (Craighurst).—Thirty miles north-west of where I live is the greatest plum region in Canada. The soil is a rich clay loam, with a large body of water, the south shore of the Georgeon Bay on the north. Last summer you could buy plums there cheaper than wood. Now, where I live, about thirty miles south-east of that, it is pretty hard to grow plums, and only a limited number of varieties succeed well. But our expe- rience is that they succeed best on a clay soil. From the remarks I have heard in regard to the Ottawa Valley I would recommend you to do the same as I do myself; that is top graft on the native tree. If you have a vigorous native seedling let them grow in long sod and don’t cultivate, and you will find the grafts put on top of them will make a vigorous growth. You can stop that growth in the month of August. Some of you try that for a few years, and you will succeed in growing most of the finer varieties—by top grafting on the native trees. Prof. Saunpers.—I hope that the gentlemen who have the useful seedlings spoken of will send them to the Experimental Farm to be tested alongside each other, so that we may get such material as will be useful, not only in the Ottawa Valley, but in all parts of the country. We are very anxious to have this material got together. The Presipent.—I think this is a very important point ; this question in regard to the different varieties of fruit we grow seems to be continually coming up, and we cer- tainly must see the importance of it. That is, in such a district as this, where you want to attain the highest excellency, and where you can grow a really good variety, but not permanently, then follow it up by getting a seedling from it, and you will succeed with this seedling ; and in sections where you cannot grow a tender variety by protecting them in some way so as to get the fruit of it, get it if it is at all possible by the growth in that cold section rather than by importing seed from some other section ; I think that would be « point in favor of the future growth of the tree. In regard to Professor Saunders’ request, I think you will give every assistance to the Experimental Farm in this respect. I hope fruit growers generally will avail themselves of the opportunities offered by the Farm, and the experience of the gentlemen who are conducting it. HANDLING OF FRUITS BY RAILWAY AND STEAMBOAT COMPANIES, “ Handling our fruits by the Railway and Steamboat Companies, the accommodation given, the grievances of the past, the requirements of the future, our most reliable markets and the best routes by which to ship,” was the next subject that engaged the attention of the meeting. The discussion was opened as follows: The Presipent.—One of the first requisites towards meeting our requirements in this respect is promptness in supplying shippers with clean, well ventilated box cars, and we want those cars in the early part of the season. I have frequently made application for cars, and, after waiting day in and day out, the fruit in the meantime lying there _ and suffering damage, had to be satisfied with a car which had been used for shipping cattle, or some other purpose that rendered it quite unfit for carrying fruit. Cars for shipping fruit require to be perfectly clean and devoid of any odor; because fruit very readily becomes impregnated with any odor which clings to the car in which it has been shipped. In regard to promptness, it may be difficult for the railway companies to provide the cars. That, however, is not for us to consider; we have to lay our griev- ances before them and let them:consider that: and I have no doubt that many of them might be much more prompt than they are. Ihave had many instances during the past season in which severe loss was incurred, one of which I will relate. I was shipping a special lot at the small town of Kincardine—a lot I had sold by cable in London, England. I made my bargain with the local agent strictly, so I might know what I was goiug to make on the sale. Well, in the first place, the Grand Trunk Railway Company, the company with which I was dealing, forced me, contrary to my desire, to ship by Boston 68 yather than New York. The rate made by New York was much higher than that by Boston, and the result was that I had to employ Tiffany cars, as it was late in the season. But that was not the worst, although I felt bad enough at being coerced in that way, and remonstrated very strongly with Mr. Earle, the freight agent in Toronto, but before I could get the Tiffany cars I had to wait about two weeks, during which time the fruit sustained considerable damage. Then, instead of the rate agreed upon by the local agent, I was charged an additional fifteen per cent. for the Tiffany cars. I thus suffered a double loss,—in the first place by paying more freight than I expected or agreed to, and in the second by the damage the fruit sustained owing to fhe delay. Now, that is one instance, and we have many such wherever we go. Then, again, when we have these box cars they are not equipped in a manner ft for carrying fruit. They should be supplied with what in England are called ‘ buffers,” to prevent damage by shunting of the cars. This is a point well worthy of consideration by our railway com- panies, and I hope they will endeavor to do something for us in this respect, as we find by actual experience that the damage to our fruit by reason of this shunting is very great —that no matter how well or strongly we barrel our fruit up, this excessive shunting smashes them open. I may say here that the greater the bilge on the barrel the greater is the liability of its being broken open. That is a point to which we might to some extent remedy the evil by having barrels with as little bilge as possible, and driving the quarter hoops down towards each other. >s>s=auxvu'——_—"4$6s> out one tree in the corner of the fence, and have been mulching it—throwing ‘ashes and one thing or another, and the scrapings of the barnyard around it. That tree has gone ahead of any other, and has never been effeeted in any way. The bark is perfect. It bore last year. This year is the first year my pear trees have borne. Have any of you ever tried wrapping the trunk up with straw, or putting up a board to protect the south-west side 4 _ Mr. Wricut.—I have. Where the rope touched it was as green as could be, and all the rest black right up. The straw covered it all. Mr. Wixtrams.—I have not tried to set a board up. I have wound them around with the hay rope. Rain would get in and wet it, and the thing would slip off in the spring. Mr. Bovutter.—Have any of you ever washed your pear trees with lime? “Mr. Wituiams.—I have not. I frequently do it with apples. Mr, Boutrer.—I think Flemish Beauties, and Clapp’s Favourite, and Sheldons can be cultivated. In 1884-5 I put out seventeen Buerre d’ Anjou ina row. They all froze. I can corroborate Mr. Williams in regard to planting trees years ago. My father kept a nursery, and twelve trees was about the greatest 1umber he could sell to a farmer. He generally tried to get him to take two bunches of a dozen each for twenty-five cents. . 4 Mr. Wooprow.—lI have just cut down an orchard that did not produce much, and set out strawberries. We picked 20,000 boxes of strawberries off the two acres. We grow strawberries and raspberries principally ; strawberries, Crescent and Wilson; rasp- berries, Cuthbert and Sharpless. 1 have a few Golden Queen, that is new. (Specimens of these were shown.) The Presipent.—Do you grow any other fruits ? : Mr. Wooprow.—Nothing of any account. I have a few currants and gooseberries- The White Grape currants are the best I ever had, I don’t grow White Grape for money ; I grow strawberries and raspberries for money. Detecate.—Are those white raspberries (Golden Queen) grown for use 4 Mr. Wooprow.—Yes. I have had an experience of two winters; I find them hardier than Cuthbert. I think it is fully equal in productiveness. It lacks a trifle in quality. I don’t think it is quite so good. The SecreTary.—Have you tried the marketing of the Golden Queen? Mr. Wooprow.—Not at all. The man I deal with in Kingston says a limited quantity will sell well, and will bring a high price. Iset out six or seven hundred plants this spring for test. They are a good growing plant, and they winter well. Mr. Dempsey.— When J heard Mr. Woodrow talk about his Snow apples failing up to two years ayo, I know perfectly well that mine failed for a few years, and I have a nice little orchard of Snow apples, too. I felt like cutting them down. I did saw the tops off, but last year’s crop excelled anything [ ever saw of any variety of apple; and,. strange to tell you, those that we took from the trees in good order, and got to market in good order, brought $4 a barrel. The whole crop averaged us $3 a barrel. I would ask Mr. Woodrow or anybody else, if with strawberries, taking the same amount of land occupied, and the same term of years, he can get that much. On the same ground I grow my apples I have taken six thousand quarts of strawberries off the acre, and they brought. me very remunerative prices. I have also taken from the same acre that I have taken apples, about 50 barrels of apples last year from the acre’ I have at the same time taken 200 bushels of potatoes per acre; and, take the whole of it, I must confess it was. the most profitable crop I ever grew. Mr. BouLterR.—Were the Snow apples a little spotted last year ? Mr. Dempsey.—There were no spots on them Jast year. We gathered them from five hundred trees. The year previous they were specky. ‘There are no spots on them now. Iam not going to recommend the Snow apple, because if I was going to plant an orchard I would not put out one. We have a lot of Wealthy apples. They are just as pretty on the tree; they bear an enormous crop on the tree, and I have yet to learn of any spot on a tree in the county, although Mr. Croil has had them spotted. Our Wealthies are always clean, and they bring a little more than Snow ~ in the market. I will make more money on our slow-growing Wealthy apples than I 103 can of strawberries. I differ with Mr. Williams in the collection of apples, because if I were going to plant out a thousand trees to-morrow for profit, they would consist of Wealthy, Duchess of Oldenburg, and Ben Davis, and [ would just stop there ; and the latter one would produce more money than all the rest, too. The Presipent.—I suppose what you would keep for your own use for winter, would be Ben Duvis altogether. (Laughter.) Mr. Dempsey.—Certainly ; bat [ would just want some juice of lemon squeezed into them, and they would make one of the most delicious sauces you ever got out of an apple. With respect to pears, perhaps I have not had so much experience as Mr. Williams, but I have imported two hundred varieties of pears, and out of that number there are very nearly two hundred failures, (Laughter.) But I feel very thankful that there are a few successes ; and that is the only way that we can ascertain whether fruit growing is going to be profitable in the county of Prince Edward or not. Mr. Boutter.— Were those the standard pears you planted out or dwarfs ? Mr. Dempsey.—They were standards trained very low. Now [I am sure we can grow certain varivties of pears very nearly as cheap as we can apples, and with a certainty of success. The pears Mr. Williams mentioned, Doyenne Boussock, we have cultivated that for twenty years, but it is just being boomed now, and the people are beginning to appreciate it. It is nota first-class table pear, but where parties have canned it, they don’t want the Burtletts, It is a prettier pear than the Bartlett in the basket. It grows larger than the Bartlett. Our trees have obtained a height of twenty feet or more, and we have the pleasure sometimes of taking as high as six bushels from a single tree, and they bear every year. 1 would advise the people of our county to plant largely of Doy- enne Boussock pear, Mr. Boulter will want them all. Grow as many as you can. I never saw a bianch yet of the Doyenne Bouss3ock blighted ; I never saw a branch frozen,. either, with us. We have had them growing right by Flemish Beauty, and the Flemish Beauty blighted a:d passed away. We would saw them down. We have grown them by the side of the Bartlett where it would freeze to the ground. There is another pear I want to speak of—Jusephine de Malines ; we grow that and place it in our cellar in boxes as carelessly as we would the apple, and in the winter season we just bring them up in the living room, place them in the drawer, and in about a week they are fit for the table. When there is a wedding anywhere near us, we have an invitation to furnish them a few Josephine de Malines. They come in a little after Christmas, and keep till spring. We usually get $1.50 a peck for them, and any man that is not satisfied with $6 a bushel for pears had better grow strawberries, and take $2 a bushel, and pay a little more than a dollar a bushel for picking. Mr. Smrru.—At what time does the Doyenne Boussock ripen 4 Mr. Demesey.—Just the next day after the Bartlett is done. The last of our Bart- letts we usually ship with the first of the Doyenne Boussock. _The Presipent —Have you noticed that buyers, when there is no pear fit for use except the Bartlett, will take the Doyenne Boussock at the price of Bartletts 4 Mr. Dempsey.—Yes; I shipped some Bartletts and Doyenne Boussock two or three years ago to Montreal in three-half-peck baskets, and when they arrived my agent there: wrote that they did not sell as well as Bartletts. I replied to him to change the tickets —pnut the Bartlett ticket on and Jet the people have them. The result was they brought: twenty-five cents a basket more than the Bartletts. This was only the superstition of the people; they wanted the Bartlett pear because of the name, and in my opinion it is only a second-rate pear after all. . Mr. Boutter.—Is there a musky flavor about this pear similar to that of the Bartlett ? ; Mr. Dempsey.—No; they possess an acid that seems to give them a proper flavor when they are canned. ‘They are not so good, as a table pear, as the Bartlett. There is: a pear that I must speak in favor of, that is the Beurre Hardy. It isa very pretty golden russett, and atta ns a considerable size—about the size of a Bartlett—and the flavor is something delicious. We find that when our customers get a basket of the Beurre Hardy they want more. The Beurre d’ Anjou with us is very shy in bearing. We get a few pears every year. I have only once taken as many as three or four bushels 104 ina year. As to Flemish Beauty, I would not plant it if anybody gave it to me, and it is the poorest stock I ever tried for grafting on. Clapp’s Favorite was a favorite of mine once, and I planted it to a considerable extent, but the trees are subject to blight, I find. They are hardy, it is true; but if they will die of blight in summer of what use is their hardiness? They bear a very light crop—perhaps produce as much as the Beurre d’ Anjou, and the trees is sure to blight, so that I would neither plant it nor graft it. Mr. Wituiams.—My experience with the Ben Davis apple has been very poor. I got some when they first came out some twenty years ago, from Ellwanger & Barry. I planted them in the garden ina good piace, and for twelve to fifteen years I did not gather one bushel. There were four trees of them. I have re-topped them—that is, put the Ben Davis top on some other trees—put them in different ways, and I never succeeded well. I have noticed them through the locality about there, different places, and there is one orchard not very far from me has quite anumber. I have never known them within the last fifteen years to have one good crop. A great many of them are inferior and worthless. Mr. Boutter.—I have twenty-five trees, and they never failed yet of having a crop each year, and bear very early. I think the Snow apple should be planted in a gravelly soil. It originated on the Island of Montreal, so I have always understood from my father. Two years ago they were so spotted that we discarded them. Three years ago we put down quite a lot of them. They are no good to evaporate ; but for market pur- poses in Montreal there is no apple brings more money in certain seasons of the year than they will. The Maiden’s Blush has been a very successful grower. Four years ago I grafted quite a number of Flemish Beauties on the Tolman Sweet. I believe if they can be made a success it is going to be a good tree to graft pearson. I don’t know whether one could grow pears on a sour apple tree ; but I never saw thriftier grafts than are growing on my Tolman Sweet trees. A neighbor took first prize at our township fair, for pears grafted on Tolman Sweets. The PresipENT.—Have you ever heard of the grafts breaking off? Mr. BouttrEer.—No, I have not. Mr. Youne.—Have you ever seen pears grown on thorn? Mr. Bouttrer.—I have seen them. De.ecate.—Did they have the same flavor 1 Mr. Boutter.—I don’t know. These were a good flavor that were grown on the Tolman Sweets. Mr. Win.tiAms.—My experience in putting pears upon apples is very much like grafting the pears upon the Thorn apple ; they did not unite well. I have had the graft four and five inches around, and the apple stock did not increase in proportion. You would have to tie up the scion to keep it from blowing off with the wind. It never appears to unite its wood well with the apple ; and I have seen the Thorn that is grafted with the pear in the same way. : Mr. Younc.—I tried pears on thorn once, and it did not seem to have the same flavour as it would if grown on its own stock. I never tried it on the Tolman Sweet. In the Thorn the pear seemed to grow so much faster that it bulged out and grew very slender, it grew in a few years twice as big as the Thorn, and after a while it grew so large it broke right off. The pears were very fine, but I don’t think the flavor was quite as good. Oan any person tell why it was that last year the Snow apples were very smooth and nice, and heretofore they were specked and spotted? Mine were spotted, so I cut the tops off and grafted Ben Davis in. They grew up into bearing, but I found they were a very poor apple. I said to myself, ‘‘ As soon as the Englishmen find these apples out they will be disgusted with them,” but if we can add lemon juice to them and make them all right, probably we will get rid of them anyway. The strawberry business I have some experience in. I use the Wilson altogether. I have grown 2,400 quarts in a quarter of an acre, but that, of course, wasa very good year for them and they grew up all right, good size. The Presipent.—Which of the old varieties of apples do you prefer for the market ? Mr. Younea.—The Spy ; and I have planted the Spy chiefly. 105 Mr. Dempsey.—The great difficulty with the Ben Davis is that it inclines to crop too much, and we mast thin it. The way we usually thin ours is by using a pair of shears that we work with a little lever, the same as we do for cutting branches off the tres for telegraph wires, and with it we cut off the fruit spurs. When the tree over- bears the fruit does not color properly nor does it attain a good size. There is an idea here about the apple spot. [ noticed in the Horticulturist the sulphate of copper.in solution is recommended for the apple spot—that it would destroy this fungus growth on the apple. I have never tried that, but I have tried the sulphate of iron and by frequently using the sulphate of iron in a liquid form at the roots, 1 have more than doubled the size of my fruit. I remember once taking the fruit I had grown that way and shewing it at the State Fair in Utica, and even Barry could not recognize some of the common varieties, such as Belle Lucrative, Beurre d’ Anjou. I took a specimen of Flemish Beauty that weighed fifteen ounces. These results were produced by the frequent use of the sulphate of iron. Iam not going to say it adds to the flavor of fruit ; I would not advise it for that purpose. The PresipEent.—Did you not find that it added to the color? Mr. DempsEy.—It heightens the color some, but not materially. It prevents any rusty growth on the fruit. The fruit is invariably smooth and fine where we used it. Sulphate of copper is nearly the same nature, somewhat stronger ; we would use it in smaller quantities than sulphate of iron, would we not } The SecrETARY.— Yes. Mr. Dempsry.—-One is ordinary copperas or green vitriol, and the other is blue vitriol, that is all. Mr. Younc.—Don’t you think by opening the top of the Ben Davis you would color the fruit ? Mr. Dempsey.—I don’t believe in this pruning out of the interior branches. We ‘try to encourage branches in the inside of the*tree, and I find the specimens grown inside color fairly, even though they are almost entirely shaded. THE FUNGUS ON THE APPLE. The PresipEnt.—As Mr. Dempsey touched on the fungus scab on the apple, we will take question 5, viz., “‘ What is the cause of the Fungus-scab on the apple ?” The Secretary produced a diagram sent by Prof. Panton, of Guelph, who could not be present owing te his college duties. The Secretary said: I find on this paper an illus- tration of the apple spot which might help us at this time. Here is a section of the apple, showing how the apple scab develops and grows. The apple scab is a fungus; that position has been thoroughly demonstrated by botanical students. It is a fungus that grows on living matter, not on dead matter as the mushroom, and it affects the pear, and also the leaves of the apple as well as the skin of it. It is propagated by little spores, very tiny indeed. About three thousand of them might be placed side by side lengthwise in an inch of space. They float about through the atmosphere very easily, and light upon the leaves and upon the fruit in the springtime. They live through the winter, and are carried around in the atmosphere in the spring time, ready to light on the leaves or upon the young fruit, and develop. As soon as one of these little tiny spores lights upon a leaf or upon fruit, it immediately throws out little threads, which penetrate into the cells of the interior of the apple or the leaf, and this growth continues among the cells. It can be very poorly represented here, of course. These, after a time, thrust out through the little openings or stomata of the apple or leaf a little growth of threads, and each of these threads bears spores which propagate the disease. This spot has been troubling us for about ten or twelve years in Oanada, and yearly growing worse, and we have been discussing it at different meetings, watching its development and fearing we would never find any means of getting over the difficulty ; we have been trying various experiments, such as hypo- sulphite of soda, hoping it would prove destructive of it. J tried this solution very care- 106 a fally and very faithfully last year, but as there was no fungus scab anywhere, I could not tell whether the hyposulphite of soda was a success or not. The proportion recom- mended is at the rate of one pound to ten gallons of water. Another remedy, which, should the spot prove troublesome again, we might try, and therefore I will giveit. This is recommended by the Botanical Department at Washington. It is Eau Celeste, and this'is the formula: one pound sulphate of copper in three or four gallons of hot water. When dissolved and cooled, add a pint of liquid commercial ammonia. Dilute with twenty-two gallons of water. This should be applied twice in the spring, in May and in June. Two or three applications would be better than one application. . The Presipent.—Can you give any reason why some varieties are attacked and others not ? Mr. Grpp.—The Russian varieties appear to be clear of it, while the native varieties, such as the Snow, appear to suffer the most. The Secretary.—I don’t know the reason, except it be that some varieties have a glossier surface. Perhaps it is not so easy for the spores to find entrance through some of those thicker-skinned varieties that have a varnish-like cover; and some of those varieties, I think you will observe, have it more than others. Devecate.—The Snow has a thicker skin than the Duchess. Mr. Giss.—I don’t think it would be the thickness ; I think it would be the smooth- ness. ‘The spores being borne around would naturally attach to the rougher. Mr. Youne.—Do you think it would make a difference between a dry or wet spring ? The Secrerary.—Yes; I think that a partial explanation of the question asked why last year it so suddently disappeared. It is possible it was owing to the dryness of the weather at a certain time of the year, and we may suppose that the fungus was largely «lestroyed, and the spores therefore were very few. Mr. Giss, of Abbotsford, P. Q.—This spot is rather an old affair, but people don’t seem to know it. With us we had it in a small way, and our people hardly noticed it. Of late years it has been increasing rapidly. We find the spot appears on the apple when it is about the size of a pea. © We think it depends then on the kind of weather we have from that timeon. If from that time on we had a good deal of moisture in the air, that we think is why it increases ; but if we had dry weather we think we have very little. This year rather corroborates the point that our Secretary has just stated. PRUNING AND TRELLISING THE GRAPE. On resuming after lunch, the next question taken up was, What is the best way to Prure and Trellis the Grape ? The PresIpENT cailed on Mr. M. Pettit to describe his method. Mr. M. Perrir (Winona).—It is a very difficult thing to describe how to prune the vine ; there are so many things to be considered—the strength of the vine, the age, and many things in that way. The Presipent.—Begin with the first year after blooming. Mr. M. Perrit.—tThe first year after planting I cut them back two buds ; that is after they have had the summer’s growth. When I plant the vine I cut back to a bud or two, then after the summer’s growth cut it back again two buds, letting only one cane grow the third summer. That cane the following spring I would cut back according to the strength. After making a good growth I would leave it say from two to three feet long, After it starts rub off several of the lower shoots. Leave four or five shoots to form the vine, and of those shoots I would select two that are in good shape the next season’s pruning to make permanent arms. Although I prune principally on the fan system, we generally have something in the way of arms to support the vine. With regard to trellising I use three wires on posts or stakes ; the first one about two feet high, and the upper one six feet. me ail " ‘ sa 107 SSS aoa_——a__$—($—90( oss“ \ = The SecreTary.—It seems to me that far the neatest system is that what is known as the Fuller system, described several times in our journals. We have been practising the fan system in Grimsby, that is, simply spreading out in the shape of a fan, the different branches you wish to retain for fruit, over the different posts. I have posts twenty-five feet apart, and three wires; but I don’t like the fan system nearly as well, as the Renewel system ; according to the latter, we train first two main laterals, which are per- manent, to reach four or five feet in each direction, and from those to train fresh upright branches every alternate year for fruit, training these up the wires to the top; and I think nothing makes a vineyard look so tidy. There are some vineyards in the vicinity of Hamilton that have been pruned in that way, and I don’t think anything is so, tidy, and [I don’t think anything is so satisfactory. It may be a little more trouble than the ordinary way, but I think it is so satisfactory that we ought to adopt the best method. J. A. Morton (Wingham).—You say fresh alternate branches ; what do you mean by that? The SecreTary.—The one that is bearing you leave two years. The one that you grow up this year you let it remain two years with spurs for fruit bearing, and then cut it out entirely after that. ‘I'hese are alternate. There will be one branch a year old, and one two years old, all along the whole vineyard. Mr. W iiu1ams (Bloomfield).— What height from the ground would the main leaders be ? The Secretary.—I think one foot is plenty high enough. In that case it would be necessary to have the wire about a foot from the ground. If you wish to lay the vines down you have to loosen all the strings, and the main laterals ought to be very close to the ground. The main, after it gets old enough, would require very little support to keep it in its place. Mr. Caston (Craighurst).—I followed the Fuller system laid down in the Horticulturist, and I found it very satisfactory so far. The first year I rub off all the shoots except the stronger one, and I train that to a stake, let it grow four feet, and then stop it; then in November I cut it back two buds and cover it in the winter time. We have todo that in our section of the country in order to be safe. Then in the spring [ train up two shoots, let them grow the same distance, about four or five feet, and the next year I cut them. On the trellis [ put the first wire one foot from the ground, and on this I extend the two main laterals. Then I train up branches to run up to the top of the trellis. Near the bottom of these branches is where the fruit forms. I pinch out all the side shoots. It is prin- cipally Concord I grow. My idea in asking this question was to see if there was any better way. After you get the branches trained to the bottom wire there are two methods ; one is to cut back the two buds every year, and let the strongest of those two buds grow the following year, and the other is to cut out alternate years, leave one branch to bear the next year, and the following year cut that out and let another one be. My idea so far is to cut back two buds, and I lay them down and cover them with manure ; and if I can’t get enough of that I cover with earth and leave them till growing weather sets in in the spring. In the Grimsby district they don’t cut them down at all. By the fan system it would be difficult to lay them down in the winter. The Fuller system would be best where you have to lay the vines down. Mr. Morton (Wingham).—The system I adopt is not usually pursued. I believe the Kniffen system is the best, and I believe it would suit Mr. Caston best, because the stock would not grow so much in the same length of time, and therefore would be easier bent. The Kniffen system is to train two branches one at three feet high, and the other at five feet and a half high. You string two wires—one three feet high, and the other one on the top ; and that is all that are used. You can train the vine either of two ways. The best way I find is to run two shoots from some branch commencing at the bottom, running one to the top of the trellis, and extending one out, and also a pair on the two and a half feet wire. One reason why I like the Kniffen system is this: In the Fuller system you have to allow the growing branches to go upwards; that is the only way that they can; there is not room envugh to allow them to grow down. Now, the natural tendency of the grape vine is to grow upwards. You all see that 108 > if you look at the wild grape vine. It will climb in a few years up to the top of a tree forty or fifty feet high ; and your grapes grow right at the top, right at the end of the branches. If you train the vines so that they grow upward you are going to havea great growth of wood. In the other system there is nothing for them to take hold of ; they have to drop down; and that checks the growth of wood, and you have less pruning to do for your vine; and a vine has a certain amount of energy, and if,it does not expend it in fruit it is going to expend it in wood. You control it, therefore, by the position in which you have forced it to grow, and that energy is devoted to fruit instead of wood. Take two vines, one according to the Fuller system and one according to the Kniffen system, and you would have three times the wood in the Fuller system. Even in the Fuller system you cut back the greater portion of the wood, and the fruit grows on the two or three joints nearest to the old wood. What is the use of having a vine expend its energies that way, when you have to cut off and give yourself trouble? Some people have trained the straight stem up five and a half, and two branches at about two and a half feet high, and another one up five feet. The effect of that will be, there will be more fruit growing on the top branches than on the side branches.. That can be obviated by growing the two separate vines from the roet, so that the top two branches spring from the vine at a point lower than where the lower two branches leave the vine. I have had great success with that. It cost me less labor. I don’t know that I am any lazier than any other man in the world, but probably I exhibit it more. (Laughter.) TI think a man is a fool who would not adopt a system that will give him the least work. The SecreTtary—You train back to the horizontals every year ? Mr. Morion (Wingham).—Just exactly ; it is the spur system of pruning. Mr. Mitcue.t (Innerkip).—I have found that there is a certain balance between foliage, or top, and root ; and if we prune auything too heavily we do it at the expense of the root and the vigor of the plant. Mr. A. M. Suir (St. Catharines).—-My system is generally a combination between the fan system and Kniffen system—sometimes one and sometimes the other, just according to the habit of my vine. If I have a very rambling growing vine I generally take the fan system and give it plenty of room. I generally take that system which will give me the less trouble in pruning. I believe in renewing crop wood as often as pos- sible. There is one difficulty in the Kniffen system, in renewing, to get the arms in the proper shape. You want to bring out perhaps a new shoot, to train it over the top or bottom of the vine. It may accidentally get broken off, and you are one arm short. That is the only objection I have to the Kniffen system. On the fan system you can take any strong leader you like and train it where you like; and the same with the Fuller. Mr. Dempsey.—We prune our vine as Mr. Morton was saying, but have also the we fan system. It is natural for the larger clusters to grow on the extreme ends of the vines when it is grown upright or nearly so. In the open air there is no system equal to the two wire or Kniffen system. FRUIT GROWING FOR CANNING FACTORIES. Mr. Wellington Boulter, proprietor of the Bay of Quinté Canning Factories, Picton, read « paper on “ Growing Fruits for Canning Factories,” as follows : As all fruits used in hermetically sealed cans require to be fully matured naturally before delivering at the factories, the advice given bears more directly in that direction than to marketing otherwise. First, we will take the strawberry. In selecting varieties agents will attempt to show excellence in many new high-priced and untried varieties. I do not nor will I attempt to argue even on the many tried varieties suitable for eating fresh or adapted for different markets. For hermetically sealing, preserving its natural color, flavor and 109 shape, none will bring so much money at my factories or sell for as good a price when put up as the old fashioned Wilson’s Albany. Many others have been tried but none will so far compare with it. Strawberries will grow on any kind of well-drained soil, provided the season affords the requisite moisture. A sandy or clay loam isthe natural home of this plant. Do not confound a moist soil with a wet or springy one ; better a dry soil, that would suffer during a drouth, than springy land, as it would generally prove a failure. Land sloping to the south will produce earlier berries, but would not be of any advantage in growing for factory purposes ; for early marketing it would have some advantages. The ground must be thoroughly tilled the season previous by a hoed crop, scuh as potatoes or beans, or early crops, so as to get it off early in the season ; then plow as many times as possible before frost sets in, care having been taken to put a heavy coating of manure on before the hoed crop is put in ; it is hardly possible to get too much manure on the land, at- least thirty wagon loads to the acre would not be too much, Get good plants from the first growth of the previous year’s setting, and particularly from a reliable grower who has kept his patch clean—be particular concerning this. The plant must be put firmly in the ground, as deep as possible without covering the crown. The small roots shooting out from the main roots of the plant must not be disturbed. Once a plant is firmly set it must not be loosened ; if it is, possibly ct might recover, but the chances are against it. Cultivation must be attended to soon after the plant is set. Hoe very shallow near it; many hoe too deeply near the plant, cutting off the small roots that should remain. The ground must be cultivated so that no weeds will show them- selves. As soon as the ground is frozen hard enough to bear the weight of the wagon, cover your plants with straw about two inches deep—the object is to keep the ground from freezing and thawing with every change of temperature. No particular time for removing the straw in the spring can be given definitely. It should remain on the berries until there is growth in the ground, but the plants should not be allowed to grow under the straw. If your patch has been properly cultivated the previous year as described, keep yourself and everything else off it until the berries are ready for picking, and they will likely be clean and free from sand; strawberries that have to be washed before hulling are nearly worthless for canning purposes. The same soil that will grow good strawberries will grow raspberries. The Jand should not be so heavily manured as for strawberries, if it is it will produce a rapid and long-continued growth of canes, which will likely be injured by the frost during the winter. In reds, a dark colored, firm berry is required. So far with me, as an all round variety, the Cuthbert fills the bill. Many of the new varieties may be equally as good after being thoroughly tested. In blacks, the Ohios for early and Mammoth Cluster for late have given good satis- faction. Although the Gregg is some later than the Cluster, and Souhegan and Tyler are the earliest so far tried in this locality. Not many black raspberries are required, there is very little demand for them, the reds being principally enquired for. In reds, select ordinary suckers of one year’s growth ; in blacks, the tips. In reds, set in rows seven feet wide and about eighteen inches in the row, unless party fancies hill culture ; from experience I prefer hedge rows. In setting out I run a deep furrow, pressing the dirt firmly about the plants, finish by plowing two furrows on each side of the plants ; many lose their plants when the dry weather comes on by not having covered them deep enough. After cultivation is about same as for corn—keep the cultivator moving. Tomatoes can be profitably grown between the rows the first season. Last year Mr. Wallace Woodrow, near here, from two thousand tomato plants, which would fill about three-quarters of an acre, four feet apart, picked four hundred and twenty-five bushels of ripe tomatoes, grown in this manner, besides a large number of green ones, which make splendid feed for cows, increasing the flow of milk. Should a vigorous growth of cane take place the first season, clipping off the ends in August and September’ will be beneficial. In the autumn plow through the rows, throwing the furrows towards’ the plants. In the spring cultivate the land thoroughly as soon as it is fit, hoeing them frequently ; keep them clean ; do not allow them to become matted. Never throw i110 manure under the rows, keep it in the center so that any weed seed it may contain can be destroyed by the cultivator. Unlike the strawberry the more you hoe and dig around the raspberry the faster it fills up in the rows. As soon as berries begin to form cease cultivating, If the season is likely to prove dry, using clean straw is advisable for mulching your ground. Cut out the canes that bore as soon as the berries are picked. Do not let the rows get too wide as they would generally grow so rank as to exclude the sun and air, which will detract much from the flavour. In blacks, as soon as the new growth gets about three feet high, nip off the ends. Shoots will spring out, then nip them off again, and you will soon get a large and vigorous bush. The old cane must be_ cut off at the ground every year, either after picking or early in the spring The secret of success in growing raspberries is cultivation. They cannot grow if choked up by weeds or quack grass. If you are near a factory it will pay you well to put out red raspberries. Much of the cultivation can be done with the horse, although forking up in the spring is a great advantage. So far we cannot get enough of them. If you wish you can fit your ground up early in the autumn, and set your plants in September or October, or before freezing ; many have succeeded well then. 2 In other fruits, such as red and black currants and gooseberries, so far the supply has been so limited we have packed very few. They are principally used for jams and jellies. Grapes are packed largely in California, so far there is very little demand here for them. In pears we can only sell the Flemish Beauty, Clapp’s Favorite, or varieties simi- lar in taste. Bartlett’s are alsoin demand. So far we have had to import largely the latter from the U.S. A)ples are used now for canning purposes, the demand has grown largely in the past few years ; the well-known early and late fall varieties being used. The best flavored varieties are the best, as whatever flivor it contains when peeled is retained when hermetically sealed. Do not pick up and bring to a canning factory wind-fall or bruised apples ; they are useless ; no man can use them successfully. In plums, none excel the Blue Damson, the large varieties generally cook to pieces, they will remain natural. Green Gages and Egg plums are also in demand. So far the demand in Canada is limited for plums, but steadily growing. Peaclies in fruits, like tomatoes in vegetables, are the staple, but Canada so far has not produced enough peaches, not being a peach-producing country. ‘To sum up, bring only the best that grows. Make up your mind that you are in partnership with the packer ; what is his interest is yours. By the growing of vegetables and fruit combined many comforts can be added to your homes, and you will be much better off financially than in the past, when attempting to depend entirely on grain growing. Mr, Mitcurtu.—Is it best to cut the straw with a cutting machine? Mr. Bot.ttrer.—No ; put it on long. Mr. Mircuett —They cut it up with us and then leave it on. The Secretary.—What have red raspberries been worth here to the growers for canning 1 Mr. Boutter.—The average price has been six cents ; it is according to the quantity of course. At present prices of selling no man can successfully pay quite as much as that. The Secrerary.— What varieties do you like best ? Mr. Bocttter.—In reds, the Cuthberts. A Derecate.—How did the Shaffer do ? Mr. Boutrer.—Turned out to be an excellent berry and keeps its color well. The trouble with most of these berries is they won’t cook in the can. Understand that her- metically sealed goods are put in the can in a natural state, just as they grow, and the cooking is done in the can, so that you must have a berry that will not cook to pieces and will keep the flavor. Cuthberts stand very well. In Winnipeg last year one wholesale man said they were so good that you could taste the dew on them. (Laughter.) ae £1 —_—-_ Mr. Caston.—The Wilson is the best strawberry. Mr. Boutter.—Yes, I would not put up any other variety. Others are very nice, but you have got to have a dark red berry. Mr. Boutrer.—You can’t get as much from an acre of ground from raspberries as you can from strawberries ; but the farmers generally succeed best with raspberries. De.ecate.—What would you consider a good average crop of red raspberries 4 Mr. Boutter.—From two to three thousand quarts per acre. Had [ known that little point about throwing manure under the rows two years ago I could have saved many dollars. It does just as much good, however, to keep the cultivator going between the rows. A. A. Wricut (Renfrew).—Since I have commenced selling Mr. Boulter’s fruit I have not had one bad can. That is a very important item to you peoplearound here who grow the fruit, because if Mr. Boulter can sell cans that will sell again, your trade of course is going to grow. You don’t know how a merchant feels when a man comes back and tells you that he bought a can of your fruit and it made all the people who ate it sick. If Mr. Boulter continues putting up good fruit it will be a grand thing for us mer- chants, because we can sell two or three times as much. With reference to planting out strawherries, | understood Mr. Woodrow to say he transplanted them the second time. Mr. Wooprow.—When I set my plants this spring I set them in rows five feet apart and Jet them run and made yearling plants for setting next spring. Mr. boutter.—I took a trip out to Winnipeg and Victoria last year. I sent the first can of goods that ever went over the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific Corst. They turned out all right. I was within two days’ journey of San Francisco. They said the goods shipped them were better than any goods that ever came from San Francisco or Victoria ; then they gave me an order for tive cars of goods, which [ shipped out there last year. The only complaint was that the labels were not got up as tastily as the American ones, Mr. Wricat.—When we open the cases we find the labels are all worn and musty. ‘Mir. BDou.terR.—This party in Victoria said the Americans could grow better grapes, but the other goods—apples, pear:, plums—here are superior. I put up five thousand bush: Js of Damson plums and sold them for $14,000 in the city of Rochester—sold them to the Americans. We grow as tine plums as ever grew anywhere. ‘The most successful growers are those who have blue Damsous. The plums we grow are far better than they grow in the Maritime Provinces. BLACK WALNUT TREES FOR LUMBER. The PrestpEnt.—A gentleman living near Montreal would like to know if black walnut trees are sufliviently hardy to grow, for the purposes of lumber, in this locality. Mr. Grover (Norwood).—After [| first began to plaut black walnut I made the same enquiry as this gentleman. One of my neighbours said it would not grow here at all. -I accidentally heard of Mr. Joly, of Quebec, and wrote to him, He sent me back a ]i tle pamphlet he had published a year or two ago saying that he had planted twenty- five bushels of black walnuts and they were then bearing their first crop at or near Quebec. I thought there would be no trouble, therefore, in central Ontario. I planted a large quantity and imported a large quantity of seedlings, and they are doing very well indeed. I don’t see any trouble in raising them here as well as hivkory or butternut ; they seem to do as well, or perhaps a little better. The Presipent.—The next question is, will it pay a farmér to plant good land to walnut trees? Mr. Grover.—That involves a further question. The first factor is, What is good land + orth? If you have had the experience I have had, there is very little profit in farming. Prof. Brown has figured out that every farmer of 200 acres ought to clear $2,000 an acre. I cannot find that any other farmer thinks so. There are very few farms that 112 are worked to the fullest extent. There are a few acres that we never can reach, perhaps across the railway track, or across the river, or across the hill, which, although just as good land as right near the homestead, are not conveniently worked. My experience is that that land cannot be profitably worked by the owner of the farm; it is not so con- venient to manure it and harvest it, or to work in any way whatever. It seems to me that is the very land we can afford to plant in walnut trees. I have laid out the best land I can find to see what walnut will do on good land. I have also planted on poor land. My experience is that it is just as satisfactory on good land as any other crop you want to sow. Land not occupied by the owner at all, in the hands of a female or of a corporation, where you have to pay for superintendence and management, counting the time lost, putting on improvements and repairs, etc., will bring very little income. I have looked up the amount of rent that land will bring in Ontario. The Government report in Ontario represents it $3.60 an acre in Brant or Oxford; $3.60 is what the ~ tenant pays. That includes $3,000, or $4,000, or $5,000, or $6,000 worth of buildings— say $2,000—and includes a lot of fencing which is rapidly deteriorating. Now, count the odd years when a man is to get no rent and pay for the repairs; you find you will lose from one-seventh to one-third of the whole rent and bring it down to a little over $2 an acre ; and I am certain that, counting Prof. Brown’s estimate of walnut trees, you will see that, after four or five years it requires no labor, or superintendence, or expense, at the end of four or five years it will pay a very good profit. Prof. Brown also found that small walnut trees, three or four inches, can be sold for veneers. In Essex, and Lambton, and Kent they are digging up old walnut stumps and carrying them off to the States to manu- facture. All over Ohio they are hunting around for any old remains left on the farm. Black walnut is to-day the most valuable timber, and the most rapidly growing into value, of any timber a man can plant. 7 Mr. Boutter.—Give us your information where the walnuts could be purchased. Mr. Grover-—Any nursery in the States can furnish any of them. Mr. Smith, in St. Catharines, can also furnish them. I notice an advertisement here in the Horticul- twrist of seedlings. It is just as easy to handle as the potato ; all you have got to do is to stick it in the ground, and you can’t help it growing. Mr. Boutrer.—You plant the nut itself and grow your own? Mr. Grover.—Yes; I put them out last fall myself. Plant them in fall wheat stubble, or plant them in any ordinary soil. They are very thrifty; they will grow from the nut. I have arranged them four feet apart every way. I planted them more for the purpose of cultivation, eight feet apart in rows ; then you could cultivate those rows with currants or any thing you like. It takes 4,700 trees to an acre at four feet apart. 2,000 walnut trees on an acre of land would bea pretty handsome piece of timber. TRANSPLANTING SPRUCE TREES. The Prestipent.—A delegate would like to know the best method and best time of year to transplant spruce trees. Will they succeed on high, dry ground, or must they be grown on moist ground ? Mr. SmitH.—He has reference to native spruce. I have never had much experience in transplanting spruce from the forest, but our best time for Norway spruce we consider is in the fore-part of May, about the time the buds are starting out. The Norway spruce will grow on dry ground. Mr. Bristot.—I bought eighty spruce trees for the use of the cemetery. I put out about eighty last year, and out of eighty some eight or nine are alive. I put out about a hundred this spring and about eight out of ten are now dead. The most of the land is high and dry. They live much better down in the valley. A Delegate.—What time did you plant them ? Mr. Bristor.—About the last of April. Last year we planted them about the middle of June. 113 — Mr. Smiru.—tThe great secret of transplanting spruce or any kind of evergreens is in keeping the roots moist. If they are at all exposed to the influence of the sun or dry winds between the digging up and the planting out, you might just as well throw them on the brush heap. There is a resinous substance which, if it once becomes dry, it closes. up the pores of the roots, and they are gone. Mr. Bristor.—Do you think that if we get them from the nursery that would be any better ! ; Mr. Smiru.—I think so, if they are properly packed. Mr. Wricut.—Send your man out to the forest on a rainy day, andset them out at once and they will grow. Mr. Caston.—To my notion there is nothing prettier than our own native spruce, and I find nothing easier to grow. The Secrerary.—The white spruce. Mr. Caston —Yes. It grows to be a very beautifully shaped tree. A good time ta plant it is the first week in June, on a rainy day ; and if you can’t get a cloudy or rainy day in the first week of June, you had better postpone your planting till next year, Take as much soil as possible, and they are almost sure to grow. I have them living this year that were transplanted the first week in June, and I only watered them a few times after planting. Mr. Wricut.—As fine a row of spruce trees as I ever saw was planted on Dominion Day, the first of July ; everyone lived. HYBRIDIZATION. Mr. P. C. Dempszy said: This subject I feel very delicate in undertaking, when I look about me and see so many persons that are well up in botany, in fact, botany their hobby. However, allow me to acknowledge certain authors upon this subject. Some years ago we posted ourselves in VanMons’ theory in producing new fruits. VanMons? was in the habit of growing from seed first, and of the first fruits that these seedlingg produced he would plant the seeds, and by passing them through two or three genera- tions in this way he would generally find that he had arrived very nearly at a state of perfection. By this means he produced some very fine fruits. Im VanMons’ day, how- ever, such a thing as crossing was unknown. Itis, comparatively speaking, a new theory in the production of new fruits. Again allow me to acknowledge some individuals. I-have learned much in private conversation with men like our own Mr. Saunders upon thig “subject ; from Mr. Ellwanger, who was so successful in producing new roses from crogs- ing, and from many others that have been successful. Now what we usually understand by the word hybrids is only cross-bred. The producing a hybrid would be the result of crossing two different species, but we often miscal] it hybridizing where we are simply crossing two varieties of the same species. Mr. Hilborn was telling me to-day that they had succeeded in Ottawa this year on the experimental grounds in crossing the strawberry and the raspberry. That, I presume, might be called hybridization, but in crossing two varieties of the same species, like the pear or the apple, it is really not producing a hybrid. The object in crossing them is simply to geta variety for instance possessing the constitution of an inferior fruit and the quality of a superior fruit. That is the main object we have in cross-breeding. Now in order to do this, let me describe the principle of operating upon the blossom. Let my hand repre. sent a flower. Let my fingers represent the stamens, and my thumb the pistil with the stigma at the terminus and the embryo fruit at the base. In order to hybridize or cross that flower with another variety we simply have to open a blossom artificially just before it is ready to burst, by hand, and pick off with a small p&ir of tweezers all these stamens, and we have the naked pistil exposed. Then we gather when ripe the pollen that is contained in the anther of the stamen when perfectly ripe, ready to burst, or rather have bursted ; we gather it on a fine camel’s hair brush and apply it to the stigma of the flower 8 (F.G.) 114 from which we have removed the stamens. We don’t always use a camel’s hair brush. I have done it with a pencil, or my finger, or anything that is most convenient at the time. When we remove these stamens it is necessary that we should protect this flower, either by a bag made of paper or one made of thin cloth ; but the cloths should be very fine and very close in order to insure against the air carrying these small grains of pollen—they are very small, indeed ; we scarcely can see some of them with the naked eye, and they are in danger of passing through a coarse gauze, consequently it is necessary to use a paper or a very fine gauze. Then, again, we run another risk when we open this for the purpose of applying the pollen. The plant should be examined twice at all events after removing the stamens, and when we open this we are in danger of the flying pollen in the atmosphere dropping on the stigma of the plant, and so we fail in getting a cross between the varieties we wish to cross, so that we often are looking forward to a success when we fail entirely. After we have a blossom crossed we simply watch the fruit to see that nobody gets it and runs away with it. We take good care that we have that fruit matured. We plant the trees growing from its seed and watch them very carefully until we get them into fruiting. The PrEsIDENT.—When you bring your tree into fruit then you ascertain whether you have succeeded in the crossing or not ? Mr. DempsEy.—You can always tell from the growth of a tree whether you have succeeded in having across or not. For example: I have a pear that has fruited for some few years. There are some here that have had the pleasure of eating it. That tree was the result of a cross between the Bartlett blossom fertilized with the pollen of the Duchess de Angouléme. You can see the cross in the growth of the tree. You can see the two appearances distinctly in the tree; the form of the buds resembles the Duchess, though it is produced from the seed of a Bartlett. The growth of the wood looks like the Duchess, and you will see this even in the fruit and even in the foliage, — both the Bartlett and the Duchess; you can see at once that there is a cross effected there. Again, in the flavor you can taste the flavor of the two varieties. The season of maturing is nearer that of the Duchess than that of the Bartlett. It is a late pear. We have crossed several other things, and perhaps I will be digressing if I told of them, such as vegetables, flowers, etc. The PresipENT.—In planting the seed of that first fruit, the result of the cross, do you find that each seed, if it is a success, produces the same or a different variety ? Mr. Dempsey—Each seed produces a different variety, and then you select from that. You would be surprised to see that perhaps from the same fruit one variety would be large and another small, and one variety liable to rot at any time from the core and the other improving the longer you keep it—commencing to ripen, in other words, from the outside. This is a very important point in pears, to get such varieties as do not commence to rot from the core, because we are often disappointed in pears—they are rotten and yet look perfectly sound. Mr. Caston.—Do you find it a difficult matter to hybridize a grape ? Mr. Dempsey.—No, it is no difficulty at all. It is all done as [ showed you, and what will apply to a pear will apply to the grape. There are some varieties of straw- berries, such as the Manchester or the Crescent Seedling, on which there are no stems to remove and which do not produce any pollen; and all you have to do is gather the pollen from the variety you wish to cross them with, protect the pistil and dust the flowers, and you have a cross. In vegetables, for instance in the cucumber family, the pollen is on the stem, that is, stands up near the foliage, while the pistil blossom is attached to the embryo fruit running almost horizontally on the vines. It is a little difficult to cross the apple with the pear. We did produce, however, a couple of trees that I supposed to be across. A neighbor of mine was quite conceited in his knowledge of varieties of fruit, and told me he had never been shown a specimen of fruit, except three, in all his life that he couldn’t tell the name of, so I took one of them out of my pocket and asked him what variety that was. “Oh,” he says, ‘‘ You can’t fool me, that is a little Tolman Sweet.” And I told him to be sure and look very carefully before he decided, that he might be mistaken, and so on ; and his son was by and said, ‘“ No, father, you are mistaken this time, that ain’t an apple at all, 115 it is a pear.” “ Well, they two had to argue the thing out, one arguing that it was a pear, and the other arguing that it was an apple. However, there is one thing I will say, that it was just about as worthless as anything that ever grew in the world (laughter), but it shows that a cross may be effected. That was a genuine hybrid. Mr. Caston.—In crossing the grape do you just hybridize one blossom or go over the whole bunch 4 Mr. Dempsry.—The blossom that we don’t operate on we simply cut off, and that is necessary. You could not protect one blossom simply, but you must protect the whole +unch—have a bag and draw it over. There is one theory that Professor Saunders has been advocating that we should not lose sight of, that is, the constitution of the progeny invariably comes from the female. Now this, I think, can be adopted, from the fact that he*has crossed a great many different species of fruits and flowers, and this, he says, is the result of his experience. If you want a strong tree don’t fail to select a variety for the female parent with a strong constitution, and for the quality of fruit you can almost invariably depend upon the male. This theory, of course, fails to a certain extent under some circumstances but generally you can calculate that it will be correct. Now to prove to you the influence the male has over the female parent in the producing of cross breeds I will mention that we crossed some corns last year. Where we had a cross between the Yellow Flint Corn as the male, and the Stowell’s Evergreen, a sweet corn, we found invariably it produced a Yellow Dent Oorn. Then we reversed that, and where the ¢ross was reversed the Yellow Flint Corn used as the female, and Stowell’s Evergreen used as the male it produced a sweet corn. We crossed a few flowers some years ago. You that have a great amount of patience I advise you to try. I crossed some Japan Lilies with the Amaryllises, and I was able to show the result some thirteen or four- teen years after I made the cross. (Applause.) FORESTRY AND TREE PLANTING. Rev. George Bell, L.L.D., of Queen’s University, Kingston, read the following paper : In the thoughts which I desire to present to the Association, I do not expect to offer anything new, but considering the immense importance of the subject, I shall be satisfied if I can awake attention by reiterating truths known to you all, but the force of which is overborne by the inertia of ordinary human nature, and other causes. In its state of nature, our Province was largely covered with thick forests. and the severe labor imposed on the first settlers of hewing out homes among them and clearin the iand for agriculture, and the building of towns and villages, very naturally led. to the belief that all trees were man’s natural enemies, to be got rid of as speedily and com- pletely as possible. The same process of cutting and burning weat on in this country, as formerly in older ones, until we are beginning to find our rivers destructive torrents in spring, and so dried up in summer as to be in many cases worthless as water-powers or waterways ; our lands dried up and scorched with sweeping winds in summer, and our _ tender fruits damaged by the blasts of winter. At the same time our supply of valuable timber for building and other purposes is in many localities becoming scarce and expensive. In many of the countries of Europe large tracts of forest are owned or managed by the Government, and, although involving heavy expense for management, furnish some return of revenue from their annual produce. Our country is younger, and the same necessity of careful attention to forestry is not so apparent, yet everyone who gives the matter much thought must be aware that it is none too soon that something very decisive should be done, and very widely done, if as a people we are not to suffer serious loss from the bareness of the country turning it into a partial desert. Let me refer for a moment to the ways in which the country is being denuded of trees : 1. Cutting down in clearing.—It has often been said that farmers should not make a clean sweep, but should leave some young trees to grow up. But some make that suggestion who do not know the difficulty in the way of carrying it out. It is extremely 116 —— difficult to save small trees growing in dense forest during the process of clearing, and even if saved then they would die afterwards, or only prolong a sickly life in their new environment. The true remedy in this case is replanting. Jn open copse wood the case is different, and where small trees are growing where they can be easily preserved and are likely to make a healthy growth, some should be saved. 2. Wasteful lumbering.—The incidental destruction of living timber, directly in con- nection with the getting out of square timber and saw logs, and indirectly by increased danger of fires, is enormous. 3. Fire.—The avnual loss from this cause’is a fearful source of injnry. 4. The construction and maintenance of railways.—Few have any idea of the extent of the consumption of timber by railways, or of the incidental destruction caused by pro- viding this timber. I submit some statistics respecting American railways from the United States Department of Agriculture, Forestry Division, on this subject (for the year 1886): Ties, 187,500 miles of track at 2,640 ties per mile, 495,000,000 ties, con- taining 1,485,000,000 cubic feet of timber. Bridge and trestle timber, etc., 2,000 feet per mile, 375,000,000 feet. For both, 1,860,000,000 feet, or allowing 12 foot of round timber for «ach cubic foot in use, 3,100,000,000 feet of round timber. Telegraph poles, 5,000,000 at 10 cubic feet each, 50,000,000 feet. For 5,000 miles annually of new construe- tion, add 13,200,000 ties, 10,000,000 feet of bridge timber and 150,000 telegraph poles, As ties last,about seven years and the other timber about ten, the maintenacce of the work involves an annual requirement of 254,643,000 feet. It is estimated that for the railways in existence in the United States, about 8,500,000 acres of timber land have been cut off, and for annual maintenance and new construction 297,000 acres of heavily timbered land will be required. It is impossible to give an estimate of the consumption of timber for fencing, fuel and other railway uses, but the amount must be very large. As only a few kinds of timber are suitable for ties and some other railway uses, it fol- lows that the supply is being rapidly used up, and that the certainty of a famine. can even be only mitigated by an immediate attention to economy in use and extensive renewal of growth. I have not at hand the information necessary to show in what ratio these figures will apply to Canadian railways, but as the consumption for equal lengths of track will not be very different, any one who has the figures of the comparative mileage (of track, not Jength of road) in the two countries, can make the calculation for himself. The question of lumber supply for buildings and other domestic purposes is a very important one, and in this the danger of famine and necessity of foresight are still greater than in the case of railways. Steel bridges and ties will in time supercede ~ wooden ones in railway construction, but it is difficult to see what can take the place of sawed Jumber for house building. Add to this the question of the supply of lumber for the manufacture of furniture, and the general question becomes a very serious one. Black walnut, our best cabinet wood, is already at famine price, and will soon cease to be obtainable at any price. Even basswood is becoming scarce. Cherry, white ash, white- wood, chestnut and butternut are not very abundant, ard they can never fill the place of the walnut. In the absence of this, probably our best furniture woods are black birch and birdseye-maple, but these also are not plentiful. Swamp elm will for a time fill a useful place in cheap furniture, but the outlook generally is discouraging. The serious nature of the case is in this, that many years must elapse before the evil can be undone, even if the most vigorous measures were taken for its removal. The inertia of human nature stands in the way of individuals making great efforts to secure a benefit of what- ever value if its enjoyment is to be long deferred, while with corporate bodies such as railway companies, the directors have to show the best financial results annually, and their constituents would be very impatient of expenditures the returns from which can only ke realized in the next generation. Yet the importance of the matter is such that railways should certainly enter without delay on the work of planting groves and blocks. of timber. It should occupy the attention of Dominion, Provincial and municipal authorities, and efforts should be made to wake up every owner of a farm or large tract of land to the pressing necessity of tree planting. It has been suggested that railways should have rows of trees planted along their lines, but the value of this may be doubt- oe Se a 117 ful so far as their being snow guards is concerned, the right of way being too narrow ; but in exposed positions, if the land required can be procured, thick groves placed farther from the track would afford protection from snow-drifts. Every farm should have a timber reserve for fueland other purposes. Trees should be planted for shade and shelter near the farm buildings, and wind-breaks should be provided. In many cases the timber reserve may be made to serve as wind-break also. I now venture to offer some recommendations to which I ask the earnest attention of the Association. I would not advise the scattering of trees over a farm to give it a park- like appearance. Let those who have land and means to spare to do so produce park scenery, but for farms generally I suggest something more practical. I recommend that every farm should have a wide, thick belt of trees, either reserved from natural growth or planted, on the side of the lot most exposed to the wind, and that if fenced fields are to be continued in use, groups of trees to afford shade for cattle should be planted at the ; esicipal intersections of these. 2. I ask for the abolition of the present very expensive and unsightly system of fencing. It would be much better and cheaper for all to fence in their own cattle than to fence out those of everyone else. Wire fences banished, trees should be planted along the lines of public roads, which would at once bound the lots, beautify the country and make the roads more pleasant for travelling. 3. I would ask for the beautifying of the homestead by judicious planting of both fruit and forest trees. Of course I do not mean to recommend (what I have sometimes seen done) an entire removal of every vestige of natural growth, and then planting two straight ro.s of such abominations as Lombardy or Balsam poplars from the gates by the roadside to the front door of the house. 4. The whole subject of forestry should be taken up and systematically studied by the Dominion and Provincial Governments, A careful survey of the whole country should be instituted, and those portions mapped in which the laws of nature require the existence of forest. Then, as far as practicable, large tracts of the original forest should be reserved and settlement excluded from them. The principal purpose in view should be to make these reserves at the head waters of river basins so as to affect the flow of the water along with the general production and saving of timber. Many other desirable results would follow, which need not be discussed here. The Association might properly urge this matter on the attention of the Governments of the Dominion and of ‘Ontario. The Dominion experimental farms should go into extensive testing of many ‘varieties both of forest and fruit trees, to ascertain what sorts are best adapted to several localities as regards climate, soil, etc., so that the public may be guided toa correct selection. 5. Planting should be begun with well-known varieties of value. In the Lake Erie region, the walnut, chestnut and tulip tree, with others, should he tried. In other localities groves of larch, spruce, maple, birch, hickory, ash, elm, cherry, beech, oak, pine, themlock and cedar, may be tried according to circumstances, Especially valuable, it seems to me, would be larch, spruce, pine, maple, hickory and cedar for this purpose. A belt four chains wide, quarter of a mile long, would cover eight acres, a half mile, sixteen acres. On every farm there should be a reserve of sufficient extent, probably not less ‘than from twelve to twenty-four acres. The position of this will be determined by local circumstances. If entirely new planting, it will be influenced by hill and valley, wet or dry Jand, stony or rough land, etc., but wherever practicable it should be so placed as to afford protection against stormy winds. It should be planted very thickly to induce upright g crowth, and after some years a periodic thinning out would be a source of profit, ‘while the main harvest was being waited for. The cost of such plantations would no doubt be large in the cost of the: trees, the preparation of the land, the planting and several years’ cultivation, but it would be money well spent, and it would add to the value of farms much more than its cost. The work would of course usually be spread over several years. I cannot take up your time by dwelling on the resulting benefits, but if such planting became general, farms would be enhanced in value, protection would be afforded to animals, to gardens and orchards, more moisture would be retained in the soil and the air, and gradually timber would be provided for fuel, building and railway uses, and the whole country would be improved and beautified. 118 Mr. Grover.—I fully concur with everything Dr. Bell says there. He takes up the- matter exactly as anybody should. The recommendation to look after the wood we have got on our farms, and to look out a proper place to put more wood, not only to preserve: our own wood but the wood in the hands of the Crown, is not spoken of a bit too soon. I think that remark would apply to the farmers of Prince Edward. I heard some farmers were cutting down the hickory trees on their farms. I sent down for hickory nuts, andi I found the man I got the nuts from is the man that was cutting down the hickory trees. Mr. Boutter.—I was talking with my brother about preserving wood on his farm. “Why,” says he, “one growth of grain would pay for twenty years growth of the wood there.” If all were of that opinion we would soon have very little wood. I have taken a great deal of pains in planting out trees on my farm, and the farmers around here have done so, making it a very desirable road to travel. We had a very serious wind here two- years ago, and a great many of our best maples were blown down—so much so that the price of wood dropped down very much. Many fine maple groves were completely blown » down. I have noticed that where trees have been cut out and the cattle allowed to run the trees die off very rapidly, the maple particularly, and we should plant out more trees. than we do. Unless people take action, the Government should take action as recom- mended in the paper. Any who have travelled to the Western States particularly would see the beneficial effects of planting out trees ; and even in our North-west last year in some places they were planting out, but they have not had the chance or time there to do it on an extensive scale. Mr. Caston.—The Government have already done this much in the matter that you are allowed so much of your statute labour for every tree planted. The tree requires to be three years old, and you are allowed twenty-five cents for every tree. In our section of the country we have planted rows of maples, and we intend to string wires on these trees for fences. I think the Government should take further action. It is a question whether the lumbermen have been a great blessing or a great curse to this country. They circulated a great deal money in the early days among the farmers, and made a home market for the farimer’s produce, but they have destroyed a great many forests, and coming down your bay here yesterday I noticed that in every place there is a saw-mill, so I presume your forests are disappearing rapidly. There is a great deal in what Mr. Phipps has said about the want of timber having to do with the drouths. There is a great deal of land that is sold for taxes where the lumbermen have gone over it and taken the lumber off it and are not paying the taxes. I think it would be nothing but right that the Government should expropriate that land and let it be planted with some kinds of timber, and let it become Crown lands again, and, when it became valuable, sell it again. Mr. Morpen, (Picton).—We have seen the effects here in this county where the farms are Jaid out to run north and south, one hundred acres a mile long, and an eighth of a mile in width. They have cleared the land by leaving the timber at the north and south extremities, and this allows the west wind to drive through and sweep the country. If they had the timber along the west or east side of the farm so that it would be a wind break, it would be a great benefit to the farmer in ways mentioned here. I can remember myself when all the wheat fields in the county were winter-killed, except a little streak along the footings where the snow remained in the banks. It is a great loss that way, the des- truction of timber. I know a farmer who allowed the trees to grow the whole length of his farm, and he grew wheat and he got rich while the neighbors didn’t get along. Now one neighbor has stimulated another, so that the whole township has planted trees along the roadside. In another township north of this you would find very little plant- ing. I have observed, in travelling through the country, one large tree in a field, and all the cattle gathered under it from the hot sun on a warm day for shelter, and perhaps. the next winter there would be a great deal of snow, and they would go and cut that tree down ; and many times I have seen cattle suffering from the heat and from the flies. Such conduct lesssens the success of the stock raising, the animal would not give nearly so much milk by being exposed to the sun and flies without any comfort or shelter. 119 Mr. Boutter.—I heard one farmer say he chopped down his trees because the geese were lying under them when they ought to be eating. (Laughter). Mr. Morton.—I have seen a beautiful elm planted along the roadside, and farmers. would go and cut down the elm because they didn’t consider it a valuable tree, and perhaps it was the most beautiful tree on the roadside. Even in the winters you find them destroying trees along the roadside for firewood because they had not access to their fields. Mr. Griss.—In the spring of 1879 1 planted about a thousand trees to test a timber plantation. My object was tosee which were the best trees, the native or European species. I planted them side by side, three and a half feet apart each way, but I planted them in such a way that if I had to thin them afterwards to seven feet each way I would have a certain amount left of each kind. I found our white pine a little better grower. than the Scotch, and better than the Austrian pine. I fonnd the Norway maple a little faster grower, though not always perfectly certain of growth, than the hard-leaf maple. The ash-leaf maple failed because I got a Southern form of it, and it was not. hardy. The European -larch was a better grower than our native tamarac. It is toa soon to say which is doing best ; a number failed. I think the best field trees I have are the European White Birch and the Silver Poplar of Europe. The Silver Poplar is a rapid grower, aud it has suckers, which are a good thing in a forest tree. It has a better quality of wood than the other poplars. But for any other purpose than field it is not much use, because you can’t get a straight stick off it. A perfectly straight stem like. the mast of a vessel we have not got in this country. Though Prof. Budd, of Ames, Iowa, has imported a good many, he has not imported that, because I have looked at all his poplars and they all wabble The Yellow Locust is not perfectly hardy. If it was. it would be the best for fence posts. The SecreTary.—Mr. Gibb has spoken of the Yellow Locust, and just here I think it would be very interesting to know just where it will grow, how far north it may be grown. He said it is tender with him. I have noticed a gentlemen, Mr. Hicks, of Rosslyn, Long Island, speak of it ina forestry report as to its value for fence posts, He says he knew of posts three inches through lasting thirty years. That would be a great durability. He states that it would be very valuable as a tree to grow for profit. You can grow some twelve hundred per acre, and at twenty-eight years of age they would produce from to two to four posts each and these posts would be worth fifty cents each ; that would be a total yield of over $2,000 from an acre. Mr. Caston.—Was this in Ontario ? The SecretaRy.—No, it was on Long Island. Where we can successfully grow these locusts, they would be a very profitable tree. In Grimsby the Pseudacacia. or Yellow Locust is not affected by the borer in the least and it is perfectly hardy. I have some trees of it planted some fifty or sixty years ago, and they are about seventy-five feet high, with trunks over eleven feet in circumference. They grow faster- than any other tree I know of. Mr. GarpNner.—Thirty years ago this spring I set a Balm of Gilead, and it is now- over three feet through. The Secretary.—Do you know the value of that wood here ? ; Mr. GarpDNER.—It is worth about $15 or $16 a thousand—about the same as bass- wood. Mr. Caston.—There is another tree that has not been mentioned here to-day, that is the white ironwood. Carriage makers are now using it in preference to hickory for wheels. Second-growth white ironwood makes better wheels, and you have to pay three. or four dollars a set more for them. It is a very slow grower. The SecreTary.—The locust tree is used for the same purpose, and is ever so much. faster a grower. Mr. Caston.—For wheels ? The Secretary.—Yes. The yellow locust is used for wheels, not the clammy locust, which is a much smaller tree and often riddled by the borer. Mr. Giss.—There is a great difference in the hardiness of the locust. Mr, Beaver, of Milwaukee, had some trees that he sent to Dakota. They had proved perfectly hardy there, but whether it was in Central Dakota I don’t know. The tree is certainly long-lived 120 in many instances, for that which is said to be the first tree that was carried from this ‘country to France is still living in Paris, and it was planted about 1680. Ido wish we knew where we could get the seeds from the northern limit of this yellow locust and the Platanus, the Plane tree. I have a Coffee tree I got from Rochester. It sometimes goes back six inches, and in other cases it is quite hardy. There are a number of trees which, if we can only get them from their northern limits, are hardy and will stand our “exceptional winter ; but if we get one that will stand only our ordinary winter, some day when we get an exceptional winter they will fail. Mr. GARDNER.—We have any amount of this seed, and it is flying all over. Mr. Grisps.—I don’t want to get it from here; I want it from some higher limits. We are continually getting seed from the southern limits. Another thing: I wish we knew where we could get the nuts, for planting, of the sweet hickory, that is, a selected “sweet hickory of the largest size and thin shell. Mr. GARDNER.—Come here in the fall of the year and we can furnish you any amount of them. ; Mr. MitoHe.i.—Is the Plane tree you mention sometimes called the sycamore ? Mr. Gips.—Yes. Mr. Caston.—There was a tree sent out three or four years ago, the Catalpa Speciosa, by the Association. Have any members got it growing? There is a specimen three -years old where I am living—a very remarkable tree, nine or ten inches across, which has very large leaves and looks very well. A De.ecate.—I have had one three or four years ; it is perfectly hardy. The Presipent.—The tree is perfectly hardy in the Province of Quebec. Mr. Gibb has several. Mr. Grps.—I would not say hardy. The wood is often rotten on the inside, and I have lost a number of them. It shivers during winter. For a climate a little milder ‘than Abbotsford it is all right. Mr. Morton.—Last summer we saw a number at the English Church clergyman’s ‘place in Collingwood, and they were perfectly hardy there. WHEN AND HOW TO CULTIVATE THE STRAWBERRY. Mr. Hitsorn.—The method that I generally adopt is to have the ground well prepared to plant as early in the spring as possible in rows about four feet apart, and a foot apart in the row, and to keep the runners cut off up to this time, and to thoroughly cultivate as near the plants as possible without interfering with the roots ; and the little Space you can’t reach with the cultivator go over with the hoe, and weed out with the fingers any weeds growing close to the plants. Constant cultivation, constant stirring well is what they require early in the spring and about the middle of this month or a little later. If you let the runners begin to grow they will form a narrow matted row by fall ; and continue the cultivation through the whole season. Then in the fall, as soon as the ground freezes two or three inches deep, cover the places between the plants with wheat straw. It is very important to get the straw between the rows and to place very little over the plants. If there is much over plants and heavy snow falls during the winter, they are almost sure to be smothered. Early the following spring, when growth begins, part any straw from over the plants, draw it towards the centre of the row so as to give them a free chance to come up, and leave it there until the fruit is gathered. After the fruit is gathered, if you want to continue them the second year, you have to remove the straw from the tops of the plants and cultivate up between the rows again; narrow down the rows a little, make them considerably narrower than they were the previous season, and let them grow again in the same way ; but I think, as a rule, it is more profitable just to take one crop and plow them under. In that way you grow better fruit on the first season, and you can also grow plants to supply your plantation. If you keep it up two years you run out of plants, as the plants that come out of the second el le 7 as a 2 wee 121 season are not so good. It is better always to take plants from newly planted plan- tations ; they are more vigorous and seem to do better. I think that is the reason why the old Wilson has been running out. People use the little weak plants of the second year’s growth ; they will use those plants to replant again, while if they would take plants. that had never borne fruit and dig up the old rows so as to get good, strong plants, there would be no danger of the varieties running out. Mr. Morton.—Do you give them no spring cultivation at all ? Mr. Hitgorn.—Well, that is a matter of fancy ; it depends a good deal upon the circumstances. If the season is likely to be a dry one it is better to remove the mulch and cultivate and then apply the mulch again: but that means a good deal of labor. INTRODUCTION OF RUSSIAN FRUITS. The next question was: What has been done to introduce the hardier varieties of fruits from Russia ? . Mr. Grp said: The time will come soon when I can report from my own orchard. We have got to have our reports from different lines of latitude. Prof. Budd, of Ames, Iowa, in latitude 42 or 424, will not bea guide to me at Abbotsford, in latitude 455. I can only say I have got now something over a hundred varieties of Russian and German apples in my orchard, and I have got in one instance the same thing from five different sources in Russia. There are many mistakes, but we are trying to reduce the mistakes to the lowest possible number. The first is the early Thaler, or Yellow Transparent. This is an early apple, fit for table on the 25th of July. It is riper and better of course a week or so afterwards. This is the earliest fruit I have. Then there are a lot of others. Long- field is a very awkward tree; it is a weeping tree, in fact, but it is very young bearer and a hardy tree. The fruit is not suitable for shipping, and I don’t think the tree is one of the hardiest, but I must say it is quite a success with me at Abbotsford. I had some three bushels of the fruit last year and some the year previous, but the tree is very young. It is an unusual bearer considering it is making a fair growth. I have seen one or two varieties in the west that are doing remarkably well. One was Golden White a fall apple, but a very good producer, and hardy. Another one I like very much, a bright, glossy little apple, with white flesh, is an apple called Raspberry. It comes in a little after Early Joe. Mr. H1tsorn.—Do you know anything about MacMahon’s White ? Mr. Griez.—No, except that it is getting a very good name for hardiness in the North- western States. I must say a large number of these Russian trees are remarkably promising ; and I think your President will bear me out in saying that the most of them look very healthy. The Presipent.—Very healthy. I never saw finer. Mr. Oaston.—Can you give us the name of any of these Russian apples that are _ long keepers ? Mr. Giss:—No. I can give you other people’s opinions. When you get into the southern part of Russia, where grapes like the Concord would ripen year after year, they fall back on the German late keepers. That is not a question we went to Russia to look up. Wekept entirely out of the grape growing regions when we went to Russia. In the opinion of Prof. Budd the longest late keeper is the Pointed Pipka. The Presipent.—Can you suggest anything that this Association could do to promote such experimenting ? Mr. Gips.—Yes, I would like to see your north frontier counties test these. Reports from Abbotsford ought to be useful to your northern latitude. Many of them won't be failures; they are going to be fair bearers, hardy trees, and produce a fair quantity of fruit. I don’t say they are going to be long keepers, but they will be worth trying. Then of the Russian pears, there are one or two that I think will be useful where you can’t grow ordinary yarieties and where the Flemish Beauty begins to fail. Lama 122 little afraid of these pears for growing in climates where you can grow the Concord grape, and ripen it thoroughly, because there they are very apt to rot at the core. They are much more likely to rot at the core in a climate like this than in Russia ; you have so much more heat. Some Russian pears are doing very well with me, but they can only be looked upon as a fruit for cooking. One thing I am sorry for, and that is, that the plums of the Volga have not been imported in this country, and are rather difficult to get ; because thev are growing in little peasant villages that would not understand cor- respondence. The cherries I have more hopes of, but most of these cherries color some little time before they are thoroughly ripe. They are acrid and astrigent a little bit when first they begin to color, but when thoroughly ripe they are sweetish rather than acid or sub-acid, and they are very nice indeed, but they must be protected for two weeks, and if not the birds will have them instead of ourselves. Mr. Wricut.— Which variety is that you are speaking of? Mr. Gips.—Several varieties called Vladimir. Some are weeping in form, and some are upright. Some have dark-colored flesh, and some have light-colored flesh. The cherry that is going to be most successful with us is what they call in Central Europe the purple-fiesh Morello. Mr. Hirzorn, (Ottawa).—My experience is of a short duration. I am not able to give anything of much value at present. We tried a great many varieties, I think about two hundred varieties of north Russian apples, and perhaps seventy-five of pears, fifty of cherries, and forty or fifty plums, we got the first of them a year ago this spring, and the balance this season, so that our experience at the Experimental Farm is so short that it is of very little vaiue. We hope to be able to give you some results later on. We got some of them through Mr. Budd and Mr. Gibb, and some from Washington, and some from other sources. UTILIZING WOOD LOTS FOR PROFIT. The next question was, How can a natural wood lot of Beech, Maple and Elm be best utilized for profit ? The Secretary.—I think that Mr. Caston might reply to this question so far as the maple is concerned. He has been utilizing the maple woods to pretty good advantage, as we can see by the fine samples on the table before us of maple sugar and maple syrup. The PresipENT.—We will take the next question in with that, What profit may be derived from an acre of hard maple by sugar making? Mr. Caston. I would very much regret to have a spring go by without making some syrup. I consider maple syrup one of the greatest luxuries we have, because it is the purest of saccharine matter, and the sugar we get from maple is the purest sugar under the sun. As io the other kinds of timber, I don’t know how you would best utilize the elm and beech; but I regard the maple as one of the most useful trees in Canada; and I think when they took the Maple Leaf as the emblem of Canada they did a very good thing. The maple is useful not only as a shade tree ; it is the very best of fuel, outside the use of the wood as timber for vehicles that have to carry heavy loads ; it makes good, stiff axles. Most of the carriage-makers in our part of the country have always used it for axles; and we most of us know what beautiful furniture some kinds of maple will make. It is a beautiful shade tree; for growth it is hard to beat it; and among our deciduous trees I don’t think we have anything that looks nicer than the maple, and it is not very long in growing to quite a size. With regard to maple syrup, we make it out of our original woods. Any trees that blow down we use for fuel, but we leave the maple standing there, and tap them in the spring. This last spring was a very favor- able one and we made a large quantity. I have about five acres of land in maple trees and on this area about five hundred trees far enough apart to grow to nice size. Some of the largest ones we had two buckets from, and we made about two hundred gallons of syrup. , a 123 The Secrerary.—What profit would there be per acre in making syrup? Mr. Caston.—Out of four or five hundred trees you would make, in a favorable season about two hundred dollars worth of syrup. It is not merely the value of it, but the luxury ; you get it long before fruit season, and you make it in the slack time when you are not doing much else, so it does not take valuable time. The Secrerary.—Counting the labor, would 500 trees yield a profit of $200. ? Mr. Caston.—The labor is not much, because it is done without hiring hands. Of course it would cost something for the outfit ; that is, tin buckets cost about twelve cents apiece. The faucets cost a cent and a half, etc. The hole in the tree should be made 9-16ths of aninch. The old custom was to make a great gash withean axe; that ina very short time ruined the tree, but now it is found that this little instrument will get as much sap out in the course of a season, and more than we will by the use of the axe. The axe will cause more to run for the first two or three days, but then it will dry up. This mode will cause it to run all the season. We use a bit to bore with. With this there is not a drop wasted. There is no farm but might very well have a few acres in maples. Almost every farm has an odd corner where they might have them. Five acres would hold about 500 trees, and off that quantity of trees when grown up, you can make from 150 to 200 gallons of syrup in a season without a great deal of labor. A De.ecaTe.—What about the boiling. ? Mr. Caston.—We use an evaporator ; there are thirteen apartments in it, and the raw sap runs in at one end, and the syrup runs out at the other, not finished up as it is in this can, but very nearly as good ; with a very little finishing up in the kettle it would be like this. I venture to say that there is more sweetening in this maple sugar to the pound than there is in any other sugar you can get, no matter where you get it; and it is more wholesome. More than that, I have to say that this syrup in the spring of th year, acts as an alterative on the system, and if you havea cold there is no way 1 which you can cure it quicker than going into the bush and drinking lots of this hot syrup. These trees on waste land would be a very profitable investment. You can put them in a place where they would act as a wind-break and asa sheiter, and utilize it in a great many ways. The sap as soon as it runs should be manufactured as quickly as possible. The quicker you can manufacture it into syrup or sugar the better, not letting it stand any longer than you can help. This isthe way we have it fixed: we have a trough with a strainer in the trough, and it runs from that into the evaporator. There is a con- tinuous flow all the time. It is very clean, because we get it in tin buckets, and scarcely any dirt gets into it. Mr. Wricut.—In the County of Leeds, which is further south than we are, the maple trees are much more productive than they arein oursection. There isa man named Smith in Harlem, and I purchase every year from him a thousand pounds of maple sugar. | gave him ten cents a pound for it, and he tells me that he makes more out of his sugar bush than out of any other part of his farm. He makes it when he has very little else to do, and he makes it by the same process as Mr. Caston. Mr. Dempsry.—Did you ever try to make sugar out of the sap of the butternut tree 1 Mr. Caston.—No; I have heard some of the old settlers say they have tried it years ago out of pumpkins, but it was such a slow business that it was far better out of the maple. This is the first time I ever heard of the butternut. Mr. Gres.—I have an impression that the sap of the butternut is not much less strong than that of the maple, only the trouble with it is that the bark is bitter, and the old-fashioned way of cutting it with an axe made the syrup bitter; but with these little taps that would be avoided. You could not make a syrup that would crystallize, but you could make a good syrup. If you are planting the maple as a sugar tree along your lakes, where you have not the alternate freezing and thawing that we have inland, you may not have sugar seasons. You might have bad sugar seasons in that case. Mr. Dempsry.—I have a neighbor who taps butternut trees. I have never seen the sap or tasted the sugar, but he told me it ran more than the maple and made a better quality and brighter sugar than the maple tree. f The PresipEnt.—Have you ever made use of the sap of the native birch ? 124 Mr. Caston.—Only for vinegar. They are the greatest trees to run I ever saw; they would run themselves to death if you would let them. Dr. Morpen.—I have seen sugar made from it. Mr. Castron.—I never did; there is a very small quantity of saccharine matter in it. With regard to planting maple for that purpose, a low, damp place is the best. There is another little wrinkle about it; the deeper you tap your tree the better the color of the syrup will be. Mr. Gips.—The soft maple also makes sugar. The white birch makes sugar, but you have to boil it a long time because the sap is so very thin. The yellow birch makes sugar, and the sap is stronger and needs less boiling ; but our Indians at Caughnawaga make a certain kind of sugar. It is not crystallized, and it is always made into little patties with the hand ; I think it is strained through a blanket or a moccasin, and that which is really genuine has always the print of their fingers on it. (Laughter). It has some flour in it, and it is made of yellow birch and hard maple and soft maple and butternut all mixed up together. It isnot bad. (Laughter). At 5.30 o'clock the meeting adiourned till eight o’clock in the evening. A NOTE ON FRUITS. The following letter from Mr. P. E. Bucke, of Ottawa,was read by the Secretary : 1 had hoped to have been able to visit you at this time, but my chief having been obliged to absent himself on sick leave I have been detained to do duty in his place. I could not allow the meeting to assemble without a few words and a small contribution in fruit. I send some samples of the Conn gooseberry which I much regret is still lying ina partially dormant state, as it has never been propagated and placed on the market, yet it stands to-day without a rival, for size of fruit, and as an absolute mildew proof plant. Mr. Conn the proprietor has offered the right of sale of the whole stock of four hundred plants, for the sum of one hundred and fifty dollars. I also send some Downings picked on the next row six feet apart to show the difference in size at this season when neither have come to their full growth. The Conn has so often been described in our paper and reports by myself that it is useless saying anything further about it. The Secretary has two or three plants if they are yet bearing, he can speak of it also. I send some Fay’s Prolific currants, Moore’s Ruby, London Red and Red Cherry, all red currants, as samples of small fruit grown by myself. They are not ripe, but they are a fair size and show what can be done by the haphazard cultivation they receive from my own hands on very light soil. On heavy well tilled rich soil they could be vastly improved, and yet the small fruits are despised by many, and are only cultivated by the few. It has been wisely said “he who gives quickly gives best.” It is so with the small fruits ; in one, two and three years any of these niay be brought to perfection. There are nurserymen in almost every town of any size in Ontario or parties who have plants for sale, many people give them away. A prize is offered every year of some fruit with our own paper, the Horticulturist, trom these with a little skill in a few years the fruit garden may be stocked, whilst the paper gives direction for cultivating them. » There is no reason why almost everyone should not have fruit of his own raising, if he has not the fault lies with himself, and he has himself only to blame. The time required is slight, the price to be paid for plants is nominal, and the crop, if insect enemies are warded off, is certain. 125 PARIS GREEN FOR CODLING MOTHS. The PresripEnt.—Have we any apple-growers present who are confident that spraying the trees with Paris green is a remedy for Codling Moths ? . Mr. Dempsry.—If you use Paris green too strong it will destroy the foliage of the apple, and it only requires caution. A teaspoonful toa pailful is sufficient, and it will destroy the Codling Moth or any other insect if you apply it in season. I think every person who has tried it will endorse those sentiments. The Secretary.—I have been trying it every year for some years past quite extensively. I every year compare parts of the orchard where I omit spraying with those parts that I spray carefully, and I observe the great difference. This year I left two acres of orchard where the ground was covered with strawberry plants, wholly unsprayed. I sprayed the whole orchard that was accessible very carefully with a large force pump, fixed in a waggon. I have been observing very particularly within the last week or two the part that has been carefully sprayed, comparing it with that small portion which I have left without the application of the poison; and where it has been well and carefully done the apples are clear ; I could scarcely find any apples that are affected by the moth, whereas in that portion where I omitted to apply the poison it is quite easy to find them, so I am more than ever convinced of the effectiveness of the application. I am expecting fine clear fruit all through the orchard where I applied the Paris green. Mr. CroiLt.—How often did you apply it ? The Secretary.—Only once, except that we had been at it only three or four days when there came a heavy rain, and we had to do that much over again. It needs to be done early—I think very soon after the bloom falls—as soon as the apples are well formed. ‘Two applications would be more effective than one; the second one about a fortnight after the first. I notice that itis not merely in the blossom end that the egg is deposited ; it is on the side of the apple as well. If you will observe you will find there are fully as many apples stung on the sides as on the end. Mr. Drempsry.—Is that by the second brood or by the first? I notice the second brood almost invariable deposit their eggs on the side of the apple, while the first brood deposit theirs on the calyx. The Secrerary.—The second brood would not be so early, they do not appear until about the middle of July. Mr. Witi1Ams.—I have been working with Paris green for seven years. This year I have used nine pounds. - I have used it largely with water, with lime, and with plaster by dusting. Where I use it heavily with water I prefer to dust the trees with lime afterwards. The foliage is not injured, and with plum trees particularly I put one- half a teaspoon of Paris green to a pail of water, and use three applications to the plum trees. By the use of slacked lime directly after the trees are wet it keeps them fresh, vigorous, and a lively green color. Last year I had plums trees that only had a few blossoms on, and I sprayed them and saved the fruit. I sprayed the Duchess of Oldenburg that stood near the house, from which for nine years I had never gathered one apple. I gave that tree three applications of Paris green, with about one-third of a _ teaspoonful of Paris green to a pailful of water. That year I put up three barrels of apples. The next year it failed. The next time I sprayed it I put up four barrels of apples. I would spray one side and not the other ; where I sprayed it I would get fruit, and where [ did not I got none. Last year we sprayed nearly the whole orchard, and this year we have gone over the whole of it. They are very clean and fine so far. I don’t see any spots or worms on them. . Mr. Pertit.—How soon did you spray your trees Mr. Wiit1ams.—I began before the blossom dropped, with both apple and plum. The SecreTary.— Would you not kill a good many bees ? Mr, Wittiams.—I never noticed any fatality to the bees. The Presipent.—As soon as the fruit is fairly formed you begin. Mr. Witt1ams.—Yes ; on some specimens I noticed the blossom had been stung by the curculio, the large kind, of a steel color, and it stings the fruit of the apple as well as the plum. I lose as many Duchess apples from the curculio as I do from the moth. 126 Mr. Perrir.—In spraying for the curculio, which do you destroy, the insect that lays the egg, or the larve after it hatches? In what way is it effectual ? Mr. Wit.rAms.—I could not say which. I spray the trees, and the fruit comes out clean, that is about all I know about it. I don’t know whether it kills the insect itself or the larve. The Secretary.—Is the fruit stung at all? Mr. Witu1ams.—No ; the fruit is perfect, without a sting. The SecreTary.—Then it must ward off the curculio itself ? Mr. Perrit.—How do you apply the lime after spraying ! Mr. Wiiu1ams.—I have a duster with a handle about one and a half feet long, and I put a cedar pole in that so as to make it twenty-five feet high. I have a force pump for the Paris green, which I put on a waggon in a tank, and drive from tree to tree. Mr. Perrit.—How many ounces to the barrel do you apply ? Mr. Witurams.—I calculate half a teaspoonfull to a pail of water, measure the barrel, and put in the poison in that proportion. In using it in the lime or the plaster, I made it about the same strength as I would to kill the potato bug. The PrestpEnt.—I suppose your experience is that the old custom was to use alto- gether too much green. It requires a very small quantity, you find ? Mr. Wituiams.—Very small. I began very small, then continued trying it to find how much they would stand before the leaves gave way. I handle the hose with one hand, reaching the highest trees, and at the same time work the pump with the other hand.” DANGERS OF. PARIS GREEN. The next question was, is there any danger from the use of Paris green as an insec- ticide by absorption in the soil, or absorption in the fruit ? The PresipENT.—It strikes me that the one that wrote this question is the one that should answer it, Mr. Morton. J. A. Morton (Wingham).—I don’t think there is any danger of poisoning by absorption in the soil. I believe that even if Paris green were put upon the soil in moderate quantities, that it would not reach the fruit, because the plant itself has the power of eliminating from the combination of substances such things as are essential for the growth of that plant, and rejecting those portions that are not necessary. We find that other poisonous substances, capable of thorough solution, are fed to plants, and that they have the power of rejecting the poison ; those substances are not found in the fruit, because in order to obtain the fruit it would have to go to the leaves, be liberated there, and return to the fruit. I don’t see, therefore, any danger on that ground. As to whether it could be absorbed by the fruit or not, I think that is out of the question. Botanists tell us that fruit does not absorb anything from the outside—that anything that goes to make it up is received through the circulation of the plant. The only difficulty would be small portions of it lodging in the calyx end of the fruit. The fatality that could have resulted from that could only be ascertained by experimenting, by examining the fruit to see how much arsenic was in the end. I think it is referred to in Mr. Fletcher’s last report. Experiments have been had to determine whether any appreciable arsenic has been found in the calyx end of the fruit, and in only a few instances out of five hundred was there found any trace of arsenic, and that was in such minute quantities that aman would be liable to die in some other way than by poisoning if he ate the apples. Mr. Dempsey.—Can Mr. Morton tell us whether the arsenic contained in the Paris green evaporates as it does in the pure arsenic itself? I heard a gentleman say, not long ago, that his dog ate half a pound of arsenic that had ben exposed to the atmosphere, and it only made the dog better, made him healthier. Mr. Mortron.—I have no doubt if your Paris green were exposed under certain con- ditions, that it might resolve itself into arsenic, and thereby be volatilized ; and from what [ have seen of arsenic that remained open for eighteen months, in my experience, not exposed to the wet, but in a dry place, it was quite as efficacious at the end of that eighteen months as it was before ; and all I can say about that dog, is that it was a dog peculiarly well adapted for the eating of Paris green. I don’t think any other well-bred dog would have that experience. (Laughter.) Aras 127 SPRAYING PUMPS. The next question was this: Two spraying pumps are spoken of in the Hortzcul- ¢urist One has been used by the President and the other by our Secretary. We would like to know their respective merits ; the cost is very different. The Prestpent.—I have Brooks’. It had not been used much before I left home. The Secrerary.—This is something like asking m2 which is the best instrument, a hoe or a plough, for cultivating the ground? It depends on what you want it for. The two pumps are for wholly different work. One isa large pump, and the other is a small hand pump for use in the orchard. The pump that is made at Oakville, which resembles the Field pump of Lockport, is the best I know for orchard us2. It will send a spray from the wagon over the orchard tree of any size. The Brooks’ Champion, which is also referred to, is the best one I know of that I have tried for the garden and for small trees. It will send a spray perhaps twenty or twenty-five feet very nicely, but it is only adapted to be used in a pail, not for a tank or barrel. The Presipent.—They have an attachment to it where it is used in a large tank or barrel. Mr. H1LBporn.—Does this pump throw a continuous stream 1? The PrEsIDENT.— Yes. Mr. Crort.—How many trees would you spray with the Oakville pump ? ' The SecreTary.—I never counted, but as fast as you can walk along with a horse. i have a man driving who works the pump, and another man who works the hose. The work is done almost as fast as a horse will walk along, stopping a minute or two ata tree. OUT-DOOR ROSES NAMED. The next question was, name the five best roses for out-door cultivation, giving the reasons why they are given the preference. Mr. Mircowett (Innerkip).—It is rather a hard matter to decide which are the best roses. I find that beginners very often don’t value to the same degree the same roses which we old growers do. Beginners generally choose some extreme of color ; they prefer a very dark rose or a very light one. Old growers prize continuity of bloom as of more value than perhaps some extreme of color. On my way here I spent two-days at Ellwanger & Barry’s, at Rochester, and I there made a note which coincides with my own experience as to which were the most valuable perpetual hybrid roses. I have marked a doubt whether Victor Verdier or General Washington should be placed first. The Washington possess no fragrance, but it is a most continuous bloomer. We can get good bloooms, I believe perfect blooms. I believe General Washington has been the m2ans of getting me more prizes ou roses than perhaps any other rose. It isa first-class free- blooming out-door rose. It is red—not very deep or very brilliant in color, perhaps, but old rose-growers value it very highly indeed. The Victor Verdier is also another per- petual blooming rose. We get blooms all the season till the frost prevents them blooming any longer. The Victor Verdier also is not fragrant. As some one has remarked, it is very hard to get the whole round of perfection i in anything, and some way these very valuable perpetual bloomers lack something. They generally lack fragrance. I find [ have placed next on the list La France—a. hybrid tea-rose. Lt possesses fragrance in addition to its many other qualities of value, but in ourrather harsh, dry atmosphere, it some- times does not open freely ; but La France is a very valuable rose, not ouly for out-door cultivation but for conservatory in pots. Gabriel Luizet is another very valuable rose ; it is a perpetual bloomer, which, if we count it by points, is a very essential thing in a ros2 in this country. Itisanewone. I have eatered Coquet des Alps, which is such a ‘thoroughly good bloomer that it deserves the first place in any collection of roses; and of course in making up a smill collection like this we try to get over the different range of colors as far as we can, and it is nearly white. The Victor Verdier is nearly pink. 128 Among the very dark roses I have found the Prince Camille de Rohan to produce a very ’ great variation. There are many other roses that are so nearly identical with Prince Camille de Rohan that I have been forced—and much against my will—to put upon some occasions several labels on roses picked from the same push. (Laughter.) — Mr. Wrieut.— What color is your Prince Camille de Rohan ? Mr. MitcHetu.—Pretty dark, “almost maroon, not so bright as Baron de Bon Stetten at very best, but it far exceeds either of these in its perpetual blooming qualities, and they are fragrant, very useful roses. Question. Are roses difficult of cultivation? Can you give plain directions for an amateur ? Mr. MitcHett.—I could not give a complete formula of instruction in the matter, but I will tell you the main secret in rose-growing. The insect pests have prevented people from cultivating them. Begin before you think it is time to use insecticides, Rose-growing has been a hobby of mine for a long time—as long as I can remember ; and I find the out-door rose to be one of the easiest ‘managed plants I have anything to do with ; and I only attribute my success with roses to the freedom my bushes have from all those insect pests, because everything I do, I do it before any insects make their appear- ance at all. People consider perhaps, that roses need some special soil or some special aspect—that they need an unusual amount of fertilizers ; but I have not found such to be the case, particularly when you plant out young plants. Very often I find that too much fertilizer is used at first. A heavy fertilizing is not good for fruit growing. If you wish to fertilize do it after the plant has got established. As to soil, you must not plant roses or anything else which is to pass the winter in a state where the roots of these plants will be virtually immersed in standing water the whole wiater, or the roots will perish ; but. where land is naturally drained or artificially drained, with sufficient depth so that there will be plenty of roots left to take up what sap they require in the spring, in almost any soil roses will do. As a preventive, I go over my rose bushes with a solution of tobacco. I get the stumps from the tobacconists where they manufacture cigars ; we get them for nothing, and I suppose any of you can. Some use the chewing tobacco, but it absorbs the water more than the refuse does. I go over them with that solution just before the . leaves are coming out. ‘This is to prevent the ravages of the rose-hopper, or what is called thrip. I go over the bushes, either with the water-can or syringe. The smell of the tobacco makes it distasteful to the insect. For the rose-slug we use hellebore. Some will tell you that you have to syringe on the under side of the leaf, because the most of the day the rose-slug is on the under side of the leaf; but at night it goes forth and eats the leaf on the upper side, so.if you syringe the leaves on the upper side, the rose-slug willdo youno harm. I use ordinary barnyard fertilizer, and gentlemen from England, which is considered to be a particularly favorable climate for rose cultivation, have stated to me that they never saw, even in England, finer roses than mine are. Mr. Morven. Mr. Mircuety.—While you are syringing for the thrip you are syringing for the aphis. Tobacco doesn’t seem to be good for anything but a human being. (Laughter.) A Memper.— What do you consider the best mode of cultivating and managing the out-door roses in the summer season—spring, summer and autumn? Should they be covered during the winter, and what ones ? Mr. Mircueti.—I do very little indeed more than I have told you to keep clear of the insect pests. In the spring time sometimes I omit manuring for a year, as long as I feel that the bushes have plenty to feed upon. I find, even my self, sometimes, that I am not better for being over-fed. (Laughter.) I used to prune too heavy in the spring. You must bear in mind the balance between root and branch. The branch or foliage is just as necessary to the root as the root is to the top. I pruned at one time at the expense of the vitality and vigor of my plants. Now I don’t prune much in the spring. *I let them bloom out free. J prune enough to preserve symmetry, and prune out any weakly branches, but even this spring, in standard hybrid perpetuals, I had some of them six feet high, and so I had on other seasons, and I found that it adds to the root growth. I prune after the heavy spring blooming—prune pretty heavily ; the roots have made their growth * nancial Aiea ~~ 129 to a great extent, and more than that, in the later season of the year roots are not so easily affected. When the ground is wet you can far more easily kill the root than when it is dry. When it is near the winter a waggon-load of evergreen branches will go over a large lot of roses. Cedar is the best. Hemlock sometimes will drop its leaves, but cedar will not. For protecting roses there is nothing like placing an evergreen bough on each rose plant. Pea-straw isa bad thing. Manure is very bad; you kill your plants by over-protection. Give them a certain amount of food; give them a fairly drained soil, and there is no reason why you should not have good roses. There wil! be occasions when we have harsh, dry air for a period, when numbers of our roses will not open well ; but . you will have so many periods throughout the season in which you will have good roses that I believe after all the rose is one of the most satisfactory plants we can grow in our garden. The PresipEntT.— Would you cover them all? Mr. MircHEe.y.—No, especially our summer roses such as the Cabbage rose; they are very hardy, and they don’t require it to the same extent as hybrid perpetuals, but still it takes very little time when you are doing the rest, and they are all the better for it. I find a great many say that they cannot bend their roses down, Well, when you find a limb that seems so stiff that you would break it, don’t bend the limb; dig a little to one side of it, the root will bend and this does the plant no harm whatever. Dig down a foot or as much as is necessary so as to bend the root. I have*broken or half- broken the large leading root off, so that many would suppose the bush could not grow again in the spring. It does not make a bit of difference as long as you don’t break it off altogether. But the root won’t break easily. In such kinds as the Baron Rothschild, we dig a bit of earth with the spade and bend it over, and put the bough on it, and it will pass the winter all right. - RASPBERRIES FOR THE HOME GARDEN. The next question was, What are the most desirable raspberries for the home garden ? Name three red and three black ; and is there any desirable yellow ? Mr. SuirH.—I would name for the three red for this part of the country, the Herstine, the Cuthbert and the Turner. For three black I would name Souhegan for the earliest, the Hillborn and the Gregg. The best yellow or white that I have tasted so far is the Golden Queen. The SEecRETARY.—Don’t you like the Marlboro for red? Mr, Suita.—lIn quantity I consider it a poor bearer. If I were naming for market I should say the Marlboro. I consider it one of the poorest in flavor. It is very showy, but in quality it is not there. The SecreTary.—You don’t mention the Schaffer for canning. Mr. Smiru.—For canning purposes it is very good. I don’t know whether you would ¢all it a black or a red. : TRANSPLANTING, The next question was, At what age, other conditions being equal, can apple and other trees be most successfully transplanted to withstand severe cold in our more northern counties ? Mr. Gips.—I have always dug my trees, or procured them, in the fall, heeled them in, and then planted them out next spring. I had heard it said by Prof. Budd, that he found it best to wait in spring till buds were just beginning to swell, and then trans- plant. A year ago I did that, and I had the poorest growth from my transplanted trees that I had for some time. I remember getting a number of budded trees ; they were the 9 (F. G.) 130 Fameuse ; I got them in the fall and heeled them in ; and in a budded tree the stem is never perfectly strong, and in heeling in a tree you would naturally take advantage of the bend in the stem instead of turning the crook upwards. In that way I could tell which side of the tree was downwards and which was up when they were in the orchard afterwards, and the side of the tree that was upwards, though pretty fairly covered with snow-drift during the winter, did not make anything like as good a growth the first year, and perhaps the second year, as the side that was down near the ground. That made me still more in favor of this heeling in. Of course heeling in needs a little care. I usually cover the stems of the tree right over with black earth. I very strongly approve of the plan of getting trees in the fall, heeling in, and then planting out in the spring. The PresipENT.— What age trees would you transplant ? Mr. Giss.—I don’t think it much matters so long as you can throw them into a vigorous growth the following year. I always plant potatoes among my apple orchard the first year, and that makes a good growth the first year, without any trouble the second year. APPRECIATION OF MR. GIBB’S SERVICES. Mr. Caston, of Craighurst, here introduced a resolution embodying the sentiments. of appreciation of Mr. Chas. Gibb’s services in the interests of Canadian fruit culture, which were felt by the members of the Fruit Growers Association of Cntario, the original copy of which has been mislaid. Mr. Wricut.—I am very glad to be able to second that resolution. If any man in Canada or on this continent has done anything worthy of praise for the introduction of hardy fruits, it certainly is Mr. Gibb ; and if any people ought to be thankful for the work he has done it is the people who live in the northern sections. I don’t know what we would do if we had not some one like Mr. Gibb. He bestows his time and his money, and he gives all the energies and everything that he has apparently up to nothing else but this fruit subject ; and I don’t know where you would find a man with the capabili- ties that he has who would do this kind of thing. He has had peculiar advantages, and we are reaping the benefit of it, and what is better, it does not cost us a cent; and we certainly would be ungrateful people if we did not thank him for the labors that he has. ven us. 2 The Presipent.—I think it is hardly necesssary for me to add anything to the resolution itself and the remarks so well made. I spent a couple of days with my friend Mr. Gibb lately, and I saw there in his grounds the result of his past labors of many years ; and to appreciate his labors thoroughly you must see the place itself; -you must see there what he has done besides what we have read ; you must see for yourselves to appreciate most thoroughly. It really is something wonderful, the work done there, not only in fruits but in forest trees, in plantsand shrubs. There was only one flower missing that he should have there—one of the leading flowers of any country—in his already fine collection ; I refer to a good wife. (Laughter). The resolution was put and carried unanimously by a rising vote. Mr. Giss.—I hardly know what to say, for I did not expect a resolution of this kind, and it is really very kind of you ; but, as is apt to be the case in things of this kind, I am afraid my services are overrated considerably. As to the expense of procuring these things, Prof. Budd has sent me a very large number of them. Then another collection came from Rochester, and another from Tuttle of Bariboo, and others from Ellwanger & Barry. The most of these came from the importation of 1870. That importation fell into bad odor for some time owing to the serious mistakes that were in it, but by and by in Wisconsin and Minnesota, Russian fruits came to the surface, and a number of these fruits that we have the greatest hopes of were introduced in that importation ; so that we began with the United States Government, and then those who tested these things from that importation, and then the importation brought out by the Iowacollege. Ihave ———— 131 to look these things up, and I am testing these things now ; but really, that resolution, I don’t like it, because it overrates my work in connection with this matter to a very serious extent. It is meant to be as truthful as it can be, but I still don’t agree with it. It is just one of these little works that has been done step by step by a large number of people, and unfortunately you are crediting me with the work done by those who pre- ceded me. However, we are working out in Quebec things that will be valuable to you in this Province. ORCHARDS FOR PROFIT. The next question was, in view of the ravages of insect enemies, the rigors of our winters, and the present prospects of a future market, would it be advisable to plant a large orchard? Would it be likely to prove a profitable investment? Answers expected from Mr. Dempsey and the President. Mr. DempsEy.—With respect to the insect pest, I am satisfied that we can quite easily overcome all the attacks of insects by taking the matter in time. The great cause of failure is that we don’t commence soon enough. [ think it is impossible to overdo orcharding from the fact that the demand for fruit increases at a great deal more rapid rate than it is possible for us to increase our orchards. My mind runs back some years when I first began to take an interest in apple culture. Then we thought a dollar a barrel for apples was an enormous, an extravagant price. We thought we were doing well if we got fifty cents a barrel. We though there was nothing we could grow on the farm that would pay so well as apples at half a dollar a barrel. Now we are not satisfied with two dollars a barrel. If there has been any increase I don’t see that we should be afraid of the future. As to the orchard, I say plant as many trees as you can take care of, and then stop. The Presipent.—I quite agree with all Mr. Dempsey says. [I believe there is not the slightest danger of overstocking the markets we now have, if the orchardist is careful to plant only the best varieties for the particular section in which he lives—those varieties, I mean, that bring the best results as to growth of tree, cropping qualities, and market value. We find that our markets are increasing continually. We cannot keep up with the markets. This last spring, besides the British and European markets, the Western States have opened up to us. We have had our own Northwest, which has been a fine market for two or three years, and now the Western States opening up and offering a very keen competition for our best apples—offering keen competition with the British markets—offering even better prices. Many of our shippers found they made more money by shipping to Chicago, St. Louis, Nebraska, Omaha, and through Michigan we find that the Americans in the west there were shipping their own apples to us and to other sections and buying our apples, as they considered them superior to theirs—buying ours for their own home use at much higher prices than they could realize on their own apples. So that, considering that question altogether, I would not hesitate at all in advising a person to plant largely—and when I say largely I mean that which each individual can take proper care of. It is a hard thing to lay down a list of varieties that would suit all sections ; it is impossible. When I am asked for a list of varieties for any particular section, I always give a list of those varieties I consider upon the whole to have the largest value in them. Then let that individual enquire of his own neighbor, and he can judge far better in that way than I can judge for him, and find out amongst the varieties that I give him the ones that succeed best. He can always come to a better judgment than anyone else can for him. Mayor Porrtz, of Picton, after greeting the delegates, said: Were I to give you my experience in fruit growing it would not be very profitable to you. I had two plum trees, and waited about twenty years, and off one of them I got two good crops of plums; off the other I got two good plums ; but the fruit was so good that I was every year hoping 132 for a crop and did not like to cut them down, until Providence saved me the trouble and the trees blew down. With roses in this county I have been eminently unsuccessful ; still I have managed to have afew. I must say I have gained a great deal of informa- tion here this evening, and I think that I will profit by it. I would bid you all welcome to Picton, and say in the words of my native land, “ Cead mille failthe.” The PresIpEnT replied to the Mayor's greeting, stating that the delegates had been much pleased and profited by their visit. . The meeting adjourned at 10 o'clock till Thursday at 10 a.m., and upon reassembling at that hour, Mr. Mitchell, of Innerkip, read a paper on the following subject : CONSERVATORIES, THEIR MANAGEMENT, SELECTION OF PLANTS, ETC. Mr. F. Mircwe., of Innerkip, said: I have always made this part of horticulture a hobby ; I have been nothing but a flower man. I think we could do more if we would each take some special line. There is a greater interest being taken now-a-days in floriculture. At the exhibitions you will always notice a crowd around the stand where the flowers are exhibited. It is not a matter of profit perhaps, but I don’t know anything which any of us whose tastes lie in that direction can derive more pleasure from than we can from the culture of flowers. At the farmers’ institutes last winter T brought up this matter of flower culture, and I found that they took great interest in the matter. Sometimes they would discuss it for a whole evening to the exclusion of other matters. I wish to be understood as taking up this subject altogether from the amateur’s standpoint, and as considering the limited conservatory of ordinary use, and one in which it is desirous to accommodate as many different general species and varieties of plants as can be grown successfully. The size must, of course, be regulated by the pocket and enthusiasm of the builder, but the smaller the more difficut to preserve an even temperature. The material of construction for the outer walls or sides is not very essential if it but be frost-proof, or nearly so, although I favor double boarding with tarred paper between. As to the style or form, and with it the situation or aspect, it should always be, for a general collection of plants, of some form of the ridge and gable plan, with the sashes sloping east and west. This gives the fullest sunshine in the morning and evening, while at mid-day the rafters and sash bars exclude a large portion of the sunlight ; con- sequently an even temperature is more easily maintained. J may mention, while on this head, that when attending these meetings in different parts of the province, or when travelling with any other object in view, gardens and flower-houses are always among the foremost objects of attraction to me, and that which presents itself first to my notice, with regard to the conservatory, is the matter of location and form. I find many, very many, constructed as a lean-to and situated on the south side of the dwelling. It would be impossible for a professor of the art to produce good results in such a house as this, and I believe such houses as these have completely discouraged many beginners. If I was to select an aspect for a lean-to house I would choose the north before any other, for though not suitable for all kinds of plants or for all seasons, yet many of our finest summer-flowering plants will attain a greater degree of perfection in this than in perhaps any other location or style of house. If, however, the south side of a dwelling is the only available location I would advise constructing the flower-house on the ridge and gable plan which I have already mentioned ; in this manner this location can be utilized as well perhaps as any other. My own conservatory or greenhouse has no lights in the south gable, by this I havea bench at the south end shaded from the south or mid-day sun while it receives the morning and evening sun, and at all times in the day it receives light from above; for a large portion of the year this is the most valuable space in the house. It is very desirable. or imperative rather, in the sort of conservatory we are considering, one in which a number of different plants can be grown, to have a shaded portion as well as other sunnier positions. But I will probably make further mention of this when I take up a few of the desirable 133 plants for the conservatory. If practicable the house should be wide enough to admit of a raised or filled bed in the centre. Sod and new or loamy earth, with a little manure, is the best material to fill this bed with. It is not necessary to wet the sod before using as it will soon rot inthe ordinary temperature of a greenhouse. Hot water is, I think, all things considered, the best mode of heating. The first cost is more than that of smoke flues, but where winter bloom is desired the result is more satisfactory ; the after or running expense is, I think, not much different in the two systems, if there is any difference the hot water system is the cheapest. The first cost of the old smoke flue system is the cheapest cf all, but in the winter, when but little ventilation can be given, the gas, no matter how well conducted the flues may be, more or less of which will escape, affects the blooming of some kinds of plants. The ordinary geranium is perhaps more easily affected than any other plant. I have never seen really good bloom on geraniums in winter in a house heated by smoke flues. Many other plants, however, and many of which are apparently more tender than the geranium produce the best results at any season of the year in houses heated on this plan. I am not very well posted on the steam system of heating, but cases have come to my notice where closer attention was required in firing than in either of the other systems mentioned. I know of cases where attendance is. required throughout the night when the temperature is very low. Being forced to rise and replenish the fires ona cold winter night greatly detracts from the pleasure otherwise enjoyed in the possession of a conservatory. I have, however, been informed by reliable persons that the steam system can be so constructed as to retain heat for as great a length of time as by any other system. I will not pretend to make a complete selection of desirable plants for the conservatory, but will confine my remarks to only such plants as Iam familiar with. For winter blooming the cineraria is particulary valuable. When intended for winter blooming I sow the seed in the spring or early summer, and after potting keep the plants as much as possible in the open air throughout the summer. A cool place with a northern aspect is the best, the north side of some building where the sun’s rays can only reach in morning or evening. Care must be taken that the pots do not get water-soaked for any length of time as excess of moisture is very injurious. I notice that even many practical florists never over-water the cineraria. If persisted in the plant will first wilt and soon altogether perish. On the approach of cool weather the plant should be placed in a cool, airy position in the conservatory. The cineraria will make a finer and a far more prolonged display at this season than when brought into bloom, as it usually is, in the early spring. The Chinese primrose is another valuable winter- blooming plant. The seed should be sown in May or June, and I prefer to grow it also in a shaded place in the open air throughout the summer and removed to the conservatory on the approach of cold weather. The carnation is another particularly fine winter- flowering plant. It is not only a useful decorative plant for the conservatory butis of even more value for the lasting and beautiful cut flowers which it furnishes throughout the winter. For the best plants cutting should be struck the previous winter or spring and be planted in the open ground throughout the summer. The plants should not be allowed to bloom while in the open ground. They should be taken up and potted and removed to the conservatory in October or November. Ordinary fall frosts will not harm them. Many varieties of tender roses bloom profusely throughout the winter. Varieties of climbing habit will generally give the most bloom and are easily managed. They should be planted in the bed in the centre. I recommend the following: In whites the old Lamarque is the best for the beginner at least. It is not a rose of very high finish but is a rampant grower, is almost mildew proof and requires but little care, except such as it may require from the pruning knife occasionally. Gloire de Dijon, peach or fawn color, is a first-rate rose for the amateur’s conservatory. A sweet-scented, good-sized well- formed, constant-blooming rose, and is nearly, though not quite, as easily cared for as Lam- arque. In reds, Reine Marie Henriette and James Sprunt are perhaps the best among the older varieties and are easily managed. I know that amateurs are generally advised, by those who profess to be posted on this matter, not to attempt to grow that magnificent yellow rose Marechal Neil, but if thifty young plants are selected and planted in the ground in the part of the house in which the temperature is the most even and least subject to strong draughts it will generally succeed well. I have more perfect success 134 with it than with any other yellow rose which I have tried. Nearly all hybrid per- petuals and hybrid teas will bloom freely in the latter part of winter. These should be grown in pots. By far the largest portion of flowering plants bloom in the spring. I will not enumerate any of these, but will make mention of a few valuable summer-blooming . plants. For an early summer-flowering plant the Agapanthus is well adapted to the amateur’s conservatory. Insects rarely prey upon it,and though a _ strong-growing, stately plant the flowers possess a delicacy and purity which exact universal admiration. For bouquets in which delicate tints are required rather than striking colors the Agapanthus is unsurpassed. Anyone can grow it to perfection. A sunny position is the best.. Most of the new, large-flowered fuchsias are worthy of a trial, although I notice they are very rarely produced in anything like perfection in ordinary small conservatories. A partially shaded position, a cool, even temperature, and frequent and copious syringing is necessary to success. The comparatively new, large-flowered, tuberous Begonias are useful, handsome plants. The Chinese hibiscus is worthy of being grown far more than it is. Some of the double varieties produce blooms six inches across. The colors in many varieties are gorgeous and striking. The hottest and sunniest position suits it best. A plant which is a greater favorite of mine for the conservatory than perhaps any other is the Gloxinia. A bunch of well-grown Gloxinias in full bloom is a grand sight. Those who have seen only indifferently cared for specimens cannot form an idea of the wonderful beauty of this flower when at its best. Compare the most beautiful, daintily dressed child with the most neglected little street arab and you have not so wide a difference as there is in the extremes of this flower. I mention this matter of ill-grown Gloxinias because I see so many of them. A few natural requirements of the plant need to be borne in mind, and if so it is very easily managed. In the first place it cannot bear the direct rays of the sun. In the style of conservatory I have advised it must be grown on the shaded bench at the south end. The foliage should never be syringed or allowed to become wet in any way. The plant should not be exposed to strong draughts. If these things are attended to and a rather high temperature kept up in the early periods of their growth they are easily grown. The Gesneriais another plant beautiful both in foliage and flower. It requires exactly the same treatment as the Gloxinia. There are many other beautiful summer-blooming plants which I would like to make mention of, but it would prolong this to too great an extent. Perhaps on some future occasion, if not here, elsewhere, I will take this up where I now leave off, and then I will perhaps be able to discuss a few of the many spring and autumn-blooming plants suitable for the con- servatory. In concluding this, at the present time, I may say that the most compiete formula of rules for guidance, or the most approved structure or appliances will not avail much, if the possessor, or person in charge, is not a true and devoted worshipper at the shrine of Flora. Mr. Dempsey.—Farmers should know that it is very much easier to grow flowers, and that greenhouses are much easier built than most people think. 1 used toruna greenhouse to a considerable extent. The past eight years we let it go back, but I wanted a hot-bed last spring and I partitioned off about thirty feet by ten of the green- house and set in a stove. You would be surprised to see what little wood it required to keep that warm. I have seen some very successful greenhouses that were built conveni- ent to the kitchen, and simply a pipe run through from the kitchen, which furnished a circulation of hot water and warmed the little greenhouse, and the plants were kept in a very nice state. There are some houses heated by hot air in Trenton, where they have a register connected with the greenhouse, and they can maintain whatever temperature they wish, and they grow very fine plants. Those greenhouses are almost invariably facing the south, but they are certainly successful in growing plants. It is requisite ‘that they should partially shade the greenhouse occasionally. We can produce almost any plant at the present day true to name from seed if we like and almost invariably true tocolor. It is much better to pay a shilling for a paper of seed than it is to pay a shilling for a plant. You would get a hundred or two hundred plants from the paper of seeds, and invariably the seedlings produce more and better bloom than the plants grown a 135 from the cuttings. A few shillings invested by farmers in this way would pay them if they have any taste at all for floriculture. The Secretary.—Do you advise crysanthemums for house culture ? Mr. Mircneru.—I don’t find people are as a rule very successful with them. I don’t advise them as strongly as many plants which are considered more rare. The erysanthemum is looked upon as a common plant; it is very uncertain without its management be from skilful hands. I see that a great many fail with the crysanthemum, but still they grow it in the open air throughout the snmmer, or a portion of the summer, and then remove it to the house or conservatory. Mr. Dempsey.—The most beautiful rose I ever looked on in my life was a Gloire de Dijon, grown in the open air, but it was planted just in front of the house, and just in front of the rose was a cellar window, and the party simply took it off the trellis and poked the bush through the window and let it remain in the cellar through the winter. They protected the roots from the frost ; they threw over some evergreens to keep the frost out of the ground, so that the roots were not“destroyed, and wintered it in that way. The PresipENT.—You would require to take the furnace out of the cellar if you had one there. Mr, Dempsry.—There are very few farmers with furnaces in the cellar. ROUGH HANDLING OF FRUIT. A question, which was deferred from yesterday, was then taken up—Have shippers generally the same cause of complaint as to rough handling of fruit by carriers as is mentioned on page 150 of the current volume of the Horticulturist 7 The PresipEnt.—My experience covers a number of years, and I know the experi- ence of a Jarge number of western shippers who have with myself been for years large shippers to the British and European markets ; and the result of our experience has been this, after testing the matter, and after dealing with the railway companies, writing to them and pleading with them, and our steamship companies at Montreal, viz.: That we advise all shippers to act as we have done, namely, to ship all our fruit for Britain or any European country by New York, and cut adrift from Montreal entirely. We see no other remedy for it. Our past experience has been that everything we have shipped by Montreal to London direct was a matter of ruin to the shipper. We find that when they are shipped by New York not only will the line to New York handle the fruit better in carrying them, but better in transhipping it on to the vessel ; and we can from any western point land fruit better in Norway or Sweden or Denmark in far better order than we can by Montreal. The balance has been largely in favor of New York ; so much so that it is a clear matter as between profit and loss to the shipper. I feel, _ and we all feel, extremely sorry for this; we would rather do our business through our own country ; we would much prefer dealing with our own lines at Montreal ; but we are forced to forego that. We find that the railway companies from the line to New York will-do almost anything we ask them. When our fruit arrives at Buffalo or Suspension Bridge, if it is only one car, they will run it through at express speed to the seaboard ; and there it is handled promptly and carefully placed on the vessel ; and almost all the lines running from New York will carefully place it in the coolest part of the vessel, and if necessary put a cold blast through the apartment, keeping that fruit in perfect order across the Atlantic. We have pleaded very hard with our steamship com- panies at Montreal to do the same, but they will not doit. They will scatter that fruit all around any place; where there is room for a barrel they will tumble itin. And when I speak of our railway and steamship companies in these strong terms I also include our express companies, which have acted most abominably in the handling of our fruits. They seem to take a particular pleasure in taking up a box ora basket and seeing how far they can throw it. We put up some of our fruit in baskets with handles on so that we thought they would have to take it up by the handle carefully ; but they pick it up and pitch it to the other end of the car to see what kind of a jelly they can make of it. I am very sorry to have to speak of matters of this sort, but I speak in plain Queen’s English, and I only hope that the matter will be brought to the attention and minds of these people—or to their hearts, if they have any; and we do hope for something better in the future. In the meantime we can do nothing else than withdraw our fruits from that particular line of traffic and ship by New York entirely. We find that is the only remedy left for us. Mr. Boutrer.—Can you get as cheap rate from New York, or do they ship it by the cubic feet ? The PresipENT.—There are secrets in all trades, and there are some points in con- nection with that. The Grand Trunk will charge us more if we ship by New York, we find that. We have nothing but Grand Trunk in our section. We hope soon to have the Canada Pacific there; whether that will make any difference I don’t: know: I thought the Canada Pacific was going to deal better with us in some ways, but we find it hard to deal with them in shipping to the North-west. Mr. Morton.—You will find it worse. The Presipent.—It may be worse, I don’t know. From my station (Goderich) to Liverpool by Montreal the rate is 95 cents a barrel ; by New York that would be $1.10 or $1.15. But we found ways and means of getting over that, and I suppose I may as well mention it ; and the way we adopted was this: We did not take a bill of lading at all from the Grand Trunk ; we did not take a bill of lading from the American railways ; we took our bill of lading from the Steamship Company, and the rebate gave us, in the long run, a cheaper rate by New York than by Boston. I pleaded hard with the Grand Trunk on that very point, because it was safer to ship our apples by New York than by Boston in cold weather, very much safer, but they would not yield at all ; however, we got the best of it in the long run, and we had our fruit carried better by New York. We have asked the Grand Trunk to adopt the system of placing buffers between the cars. We find there is an immense damage done to our fruit by this continual shunting at way stations. Well, they considered the expense of that too much. They do it on the other side, the American railways, or they will send our fruit by express and not allow any shunting at all. If necessary they wil turn a car or two on to an express train and run it through, or if they have enough fruit at Buffalo or any place there they will put an engine on it and make a train of it. They give us dispatch in every way. If there is a shortage at New York to the steamship company we can settle with any American rail- way ina week or ten days. I have a matter just now with the Grand Trunk. It is running about five months and it is not settled yet, and it is a shortage of two barrels of apples by Boston. I don’t know when it will be settled—you never can tell anything by Grand Trunk. Mr. Boutter.—As we have an express man here to-day, I hope he will take your remarks. I have no complaint. I can load up a car of apples here, or a car of canned goods, and I can know to a cent what it will cost me to British Columbia; but when you ship anything to the Old Country you don’t know what it will pay you. They have wharfage and tonnage and dunnage. (Laughter.) I shipped last year to London, and when it got to London the fellow drew back on me for $300. It cost thirty-five pounds to send that car from the door here to London, and it cost twenty-five pounds to take it out of the vessel and put it in the storehouse. Unless we can get some system jammed into their heads in the Old Country so that they can tell us what they are going to charge before we start, we must. stop it. You don’t know what you have got to pay till they draw back on you. We get a good rate now from here to Liverpool, London and Glasgow. I am sorry asa Canadian to see our stuff go by American roads. I have not got the sympathy, though, to lose money by our own roads if they won’t do it as well as the others. It is a shame to see fruit handled the way it is when we pay the express company a good price for carriage. I shipped strawberries to Peterboro’, and I didn’t get enough to pay the cases. © Unless the express companies handle goods at a fair, reasonable price, and handle them 137 —_—— better than they do, it is not encouraging to ship them ; and I do hope that due import- ance will be given to that by this Association, not only that we should have a good rate, but that they should handle with care. I hope our own Canadian routes will not be cast overboard for lack of a little common sense on the part of the managers. Mr. A. H. Perrir.—From my experience in shipping to the Old Country I quite agree with the President in regard to the routes, for I think I understand packing fruits for the Old Country, and when I take Ben Davis and other hardy varieties and ship them in cool weather, and they arive in the Old Country-wet and slack and wasted, it must be from carlessness in handling. In reference to the Express companies handling fruit, they do handle them very loosely, but I think fruit growers are a little to blame in this matter too. Is it possible for an express company—running, we willsay, one car on a fast train —to take a couple of thousand baskets of fruit, and take them on from a couple of stations in about four minutes, and deliver them in good order? In our place the express com- panies have threatened to dismiss the fruit growers. As many as possible go into a car and others pass in the fruit, and we can put in six hundred baskets of fruit in four or five minutes—so you can imagine how expert we have got; and the express company, when we speak about our fruit not arriving in good condition, threaten to dismiss us from the service. If their men handled fruit the way we do they would dismiss them out of their service altogether ; but we can’t do anything else. Now we are going to adopt another plan. We called the fruit growers of three or four counties together to discuss the matter fully, and decided what we thought would be satisfactory to us provided it could be arranged with the Grand Trunk Road. Thatarrangement we made. They put on a special fruit train, fast freight, shelved cars, and every convenience for shipping, and they now run that train at a time of day that is suitable to arrive in the different markets where we want it, at the proper time. Last year the bulk of the fruit in our section of the country was shipped by freight. Well, we had just one difficulty to contend’ with, and that was the cars were too close ; they were not sufficiently ventilated in the top and in the sides. We have gone again to the road this year, and they have improved our facili- ties, or are going to as soon as we have sufficient fruit to require them. The doors are to be grated, and they are to be properly shielded, and the freight train run. Now, I think if the fruit growers could unite and have markets in our towns and ship by fast freight, and if all the goods arrived in the morning, it would be a good deal better for the shipper and just as good for the consumer ; while it is also better for the dealer, because when fruit comes in several times a day he can invest very little in the morning for fear of large consignments coming later in the day and he will get stuck, so that he has to buy very cautiously. I think an experiment will be made in Toronto this season, or early next season, for a fruit market where our fruit may arrive late in the evening. It will arrive in the city some time in the night, be shunted at once into the market, and there the cars will remain till so early in the morning as it is decided to open the market. Then fruit will be taken out just where it is to be sold, without all this handling and cartage and expense. If then the fruit growers look after their fruit, as we shall, and the com- mission men look after taking it out, it must be well and carefully handled, arrive in good order, providing the cars are properly ventilated and run in the night. I think the local _ shipping in this country, if the local growers would take hold of the matter, would be brought down to a system that would be very satisfactory to all. I believe that our plan is going to.be satisfactory in our part of the country. Our arrangement there is to have an afternoon train for the Montreal market and other eastern points, and an evening’ train for Toronto ; thus we have two fruit trains daily, In reference to the Old Country shipments, I really think there is something very, very wrong in the system of shipping at the present time. On one consignment you may be very much pleased with your sales, probably the most inferior stock ; the next, of the very choicest and best, and long keepers, you will find wet, wasted, and in fact rotten and everything else. Younever know what you are going to do ; it is a mere matter of speculation, and a very risky one at that. I seems as though in the shipping part of the business they are either cooked in the hold or damaged toa great extent by hand. Mr. Dempsey.—I would not ship by New York at all. Sometimes our Canadian shippers handle fruit too roughly ; but sometimes we favor American institutions too 138 much. I was talking to a man that wasselling peaches. He said, “ I would pay twenty- five cents a basket for American peaches and take them with my eyes shut rather than take our Canadian packed peaches at any price with my eyes open.” Do you feel sus- picious that the fellow was favoring American institutions? Then let us not do that. I was cheated, badly defrauded, in shipping by New York. The PresipENT.—In what way ? Mr. Dempsey.—My goods did not arrive as nice as they did by going by Montreal— so much so that we did not get the price of the barrel over and above the freight. We shipped some fruit to Toronte last year, and wanted to know if we had better ship by express. Why, no; ship by freight by all means; don’t have anything to do with the express company ; they will charge you more, and they handle it roughly. Well, we shipped those goods by freight, went to Toronto, found that the price there was not so high as it was somewhere else, and we brought it back again. Now, those goods returned. to us just about as good as they started, by common freight, and the Grand Trunk treated us very well in the matter; and I am going to always praise the bridge that carries me safe. Mr. Wricut.—I have been buying apples for five years from the same man in Prince Edward County. The man was trying to find and get as good a rate as he could, and he could not tell me what he would do. I said, “Go on and buy the apples and ship them just as cheap as you can, and I know it will be all right.” I got the apples all right ; they were right themselves every time I bought them from him, and the price was right. That was a Prince Edward County man, and they were Prince Edward County apples ; and that is one of the reasons why I wanted so much to come to Prince Edward County to see these honest wen that raise those apple. Mr. Dempsey.—I may say to Mr. Pettit that the apples grown in the County of Prince Edward are far superior to any apples grown in the Niagara District ; all he has to do is to bring his apples in the season and we will compare them. Mr. Perrit.—Send to our county fair an exhibit of your fruit and we will return the compliment. Mr. DempsEy.—We will meet you on those terms on the first of December or late in November. . The Prestpent.—Speaking about the difference in the quality of our apples, there is no question at all that the Canadian apples are superior to any American or conti- nental apples. (Applause.) The markets of Britain have proved that beyond the shadow of a doubt. You take the average of all the markets for all our varieties of apples, you will find that that average is probably about two shillings a barrel in favor of Canadian fruit—that is, that the apples of Canada will sell upon the general markets of Britain at an average, I think I am safe in saying, of fully two shillings per barrel over any others. Of course American apples from the northern States of the United States come the nearest in competition with us. Now as regards different sections of Canada there is no question of doubt but there are differences in various varieties. For instance, [I don’t believe there is a section of Canada that will grow the Fameuse apple equal to the Island of Montreal. Take the Fameuse and all that family of apples, and we cannot grow it in any other section that I have seen equal to the Island of Montreal; the St. Lawrence apple also. Take the Gravenstein, the King of Tompkins County, the Ribston Pippin, they are a perfect picture. Their Blue Pearmain is fine, but not equal to the ‘Blue Pearmain grown in British Columbia, which exceeds it in size andcolor. In that way you will see that different sections have their peculiarities ; and I find this, that if you want to get high quality, high flavor, in any of our fruits—in other fruits as well as the apple—the further north you can grow that special variety the finer and stronger the flavor will be; and that accounts for the fact that one may say in this section that they can grow an apple of a higher quality than they could in Niagara District. Take the American Golden Russet grown in the warmer sections of New York State and compare it with some russet from the middle part of Ontario, or the northern part, and you will find the apple is much higher in flavor, and the color of the apple is higher, and color and flavor go together. 139 Mr. Smirx.—Does not the difference in price between the American and Canadian apples depend somewhat on the size of the barrel, too ; don’t we use larger barrels than they do on the other side ? The Presipent.—No, I don’t think it depends on that at all, for in the Old Country I saw through their markets there, and they didn’t allow for that at all. It is so much a cask—they call them casks there instead of barrels ; and they make little difference as to the size of it. For instance, the Nova Scotian barrel is smaller than ours—it is our old apple barrel. Of course we have a standard barrel under the law of Canada now, the same size as a flour barrel, but the Nova Scotians have still retained their old barrel, which is two bushels and three pecks—it is the American barrel—still they get a much higher price than the Americans do ; so that the size of the barrel does not amount to much. Since we have adopted the new style of barrel our average price is higher, but there is more competition ; we have markets now that we did not have before. The prices of Canadian apples have been greatly increasing in the British as well as other foreign markets, and we expect that these prices are to go still higher. I, however, have trouble with those charges of landing waiter dues, and harbor dues, and carter dues, and cooperage, storage, and I don’t know what all ; it is as long as a lawyer’s bill of costs. Mr. BoutrEer.—I got a through bill of lading made out by the Grand Trunk. The Presipent.— Upon that bill of Jading it should be stated the rate of delivery ; you get your rate marked on the bill of lading delivered to such a place. For instance, if am shipping to London, to be delivered at Covent Garden Market, the rate is to be “ delivered at Covent Garden Market” ; but if you don’t get that rate their vessel will not very likely come up to the dock at all; the landing waiter will go up and take the goods off. Mr Bovtrer.—What is the word “primage” used for? There is some perquisite that goes to the captain of the boat. The PresiDENT.—One kind of primage we had experience in is this; we noticed opening a great many barrels that were evidently half full, or very little in them ; probably that kind of primage is something that officers of the vessel take advantage of, and supply themselves with what fruit they require for their own consumption. Mr. Boutter.—It was prime fruit. (Laughter.) _ The PresipEent.—Yes ; and probably that was the reason they called it primage. (Laughter. ) Mr. Dempsey spoke of a comparison of apples grown at Owen Sound with some grown at Montreal, and the Owen Sound ones were found superior. Mr. Casron.—I think the apples grown in our county (Simcoe) cannot be beaten in the county of Prince Edward or in the Niagara District. Mr. Caston offered to show at the winter meeting of the Association a few winter apples from his district in opposition to some from Prince Edward or any other county. EVAPORATION OF FRUITS. The next question was, What is the cost and what the profit of evaporating apples and other fruits ? Mr. Caston.—I sent in that question not with a view of Mr. Boulter giving away his profits, but with reference to farmers doing the work themselves. Mr. Boutter.—In the last few years quite a large number of small evaporators have been made and sold to farmers. ‘here are lots of apples that cannot be profitably sent in to the factory. They should be sliced up and bleached, and they could realise a good fair profit on them, because they could do this at home, and save drawing those apples to market and to factories and to evaporators. How to dry them has yet got to be learned by farmers. They will pick them up and put them in the bag just as they fall from the ground, and draw them to a factory, and when they get there they are 140 pretty well up to pumice ; whereas if they would peel these apples at home they would save them. Farmers could save a good deal of money by taking one of these small evaporators, taking pains, bleaching it out with brimstone. » In answer to the question, would it be profitable for a man to evaporate apples, I say yes. I have two thousand apple trees. If I had not a factory, I would have a nice little evaporator and use up the apples that I could not sell, that fell with the wind. The help around there could peel up a good many dollars worth of apples that are now thrown away. If the farmers would do the work well they would get just as good a price as the Americans. I put them up in five, ten, twenty-five and fifty pounds boxes. I ordered a great many paper boxes from Montreal. Instead of selling them by the pound, the merchants would say, “‘ Here is five pounds.” The cost of packing is pretty heavy in a public establishment of that kind. The farmers could do that if they would get the little paper boxes. Put them in five pound boxes, lay the first course nicely ; learn to be tasty and neat about it, and you will get a real good price for your apples—much better than if you put them in twenty-five pound boxes; ten pound boxes, however, are very nice. Oftentimes merchants would get seventy-five cents for five pounds. I don’t believe a farmer can grow berries and evaporate them and make money out of them at present, because there are so many dried berries in the back counties that are picked and dried because they can’t be shipped here; and the market is generally down to about fifteen or twenty cents. Now, if you get four cents a pound for them fresh you better se!l them than undertake even to evaporate at that, because it will take four pounds of berries under the most favorable circumstances to make one pound of evaporated berries, and nearer five pounds. In large cities it is done. In Rochester a man has two hundred acres and evporates his blackberries and makes money out of them. We never could; we gave it up. Me Caston.—The equinoctial gales in September knock a great many apples off the trees ; and they are some of the finest specimens and if you don’t keep them you lose them, as apples are a drug in the market in the fall of the year; and I think when people are a long way from the canning factory, if they could evaporate they would save a great deal that goes to waste. Mr. Boutter.—Thousands of dollars could be saved to the country in that way. If a wind-fall apple is cut up right away, peeled, the core punched out, put in the bleacher, and then sliced up, the bruises will bleach right out—it won’t show in an evaporated apple. Mr. Caston.—I noticed evaporated apples quoted at about twelve to fourteen centg. I think we might take twelve as the wholesale price. Mr. Wricut.—We can buy lots at ten—all we want. Mr. Caston.—How would that correspond per bushel with green apples Mr. Boutter.—The Golden Russet apple will make about four pounds to the bushel ; it will make more than any other apple. The Snow apple will make less. Mr. Dempsey.—I would like to ask Mr. Boulter what is the effect of this bleaching ? It is exposing the apples to the fumes of sulphurous acid. I would ask any one to evaporate some apples and not expose them to the action of this acid, but try them natural and see if they don’t have the natural flavor; then take some apple that has been bleached and cook them and taste them ; and he will find that this bleaching process has a tendency to toughen the apple, even though you make them into a pie, the toughness remains ; but if they are not bleached the apple cooks and swells up again just as nice as it comes from the tree, and you can detect the flavor of varieties of those that are dried without the bleaching process. I admit that the trade requires white apples, and those men engaged in drying apples don’t care whether the apple is a white-fieshed apple or a yellow-fleshed apple. Mr. Caston.—Is not this bleaching what keeps them in perfect condition when they are opened ? Mr. Dempsey.—They will keep if you dry them a little better. The saccharine matter is what preserves the apple, and there is a certain amount of that which mus¢ - be destroyed by the action of the sulphurous acid; there is no question about it at. all in my mind; still I may be wrong. 141 Mr. Boutter.—I was under your impression when we first started. It is the same way with hops. When I was in the hop business I went to Toronto and found I could not sell my hops. I was told I would have to put brimstone in. The brimstone is driven off almost entirely by the heat. We bleach the apple now as quickly as it is peeled. I believe that the bleaching process makes the apple softer and better than it would without bleaching. You cannot taste a particle of the brimstone, and I believe that is driven off with the heat. If the trade says, ‘‘ We have got to have that kind of an apple,” you may talk till doomsday to tell a man you are selling better than what he says he wants and what his customers want. If they demand that kind of apple they have got to have it. GROWING AND DRYING CORN. Mr. W. R. Dempsey, of Rednersville, contributed the following paper: One of the most encouraging crops in our country to-day is corn, and yet heretofore but little attention has been given to its cultivation. Formerly it was grown for feed exclusively, but the springing up of our buying and canning industries has created a demand for its cultivation, and it stands to-day one of the most remunerative crops . grown upon the farm in this country, creating labor and providing food for man and beast. Some of the best results in growing have been found by plowing in clover at the time required for planting, care being taken to pulverize the newly turned up earth thoroughly, for which the disk harrow scems to be particularly adapted. Mark three feet ten inches each way ; the seed does not cost much, so use plenty, and as soon as the corn has reached the height of three inches or is fairly up, use a light cultivator each way. Hoe, being careful in weeding not to leave more than four plants in a hill; in hoeing remove everything that may hinder the young plant from standing erect ; put very little earth around the plants, as too much of the soil against the plant will cause it to push ut roots near the surface, which is followed every time with branches from the plant near the surface of the ground, spoken of by us as suckers. Cultivate each way every week until the corn begins to tassel out. Good results have been found by plowing in barnyard manure with clover. The corn feeds upon the vegetable mould turned in, and if the crop has been grown for drying, or canning, it will be harvested in time to give you one of the best seed beds you can get for fall wheat. Drying corn has taken its place with the drying of fruit. Upon the introduction of the evaporator for drying fruit, corn soon became an article in trade with fruit. It had scarcely reached its place in trade when the manufacturer discovered that the riper the corn the more pounds it made, forgetting that he had a reputation to sustain for his goods, hence its neglect in trade. Some manufacturers have been more discreet, and their brands are looked for in the trade. When the grain has reached a size such - as is desired for table use, it is then ready for drying, but as soon as it has passed from its milk to its pulp state it is unfit. The idea has been been entertained that no sweet corn grown in Canada could be relied upon for seed. This idea is being disputed. The corn at the dryer that is found to have passed from its milk to its pulp state is passed over to the seed drying room, where an even temperature is maintained until the grain and cob has become thoroughly dried. In this way seeds have been produced as reliable as any American seeds can be, by the selection of the earliest and best ears. Under this process of curing for seeds, I believe the corn will be improved in earliness and size of ear. 142 THE FRUIT COMMITTEE'S REPORT. The Fruit Committee reported as follows: The Committee on Fruits exhibited at the summer meeting of the Fruit Growers’ Association have the- honor to report that the canned goods department was fully represented by Wellington Boulter, proprie- tor of Bay of Quinte canning factory. Pears, plums, quinces, strawberries, blueberries, corn, peas and pumpkins—all were found upon examination to be of superior quality, and presenting the same fresh. appearance as when first put up. J. A. Morton, Wingham, shows Crown Bob, Whitesmith and Ocean Wave in gooseberries, all English. varieties of good size. A. Morton, Brampton, one plate of Ringer gooseberries of fine appearance, and largest in size of any gooseber1y shown. P. E. Bucke, Ottawa, Conn and Downing gooseberries ; the Conn as compared with Downing grown. side by side appears to be double in size. He also shows Moore’s Ruby, Cherry, London Red and Fay’s. Prolific currants, all good size. Wallace Woodrow, Picton, shows Wilson, Crescent, Manchester, Sharpless and Jersey Queen straw- berries, Downing gooseberry and White Grape currant, all showing evidence of high culture. Also samples of ‘‘ Home” canned goods in Shaffer and Golden Queen in rasps. and White Grape currant, all. presenting a fine appearance. A. M. Smith, St. Catharines, Marlboro and Highland Hardy raspberries and Vergennes grape. This. grape is of last season’s crop, packed in hardwood sawdust and remarkably well kept, although the flavor is not quite equal to freshly gathered fruit. Thisis evidence of what can be done in keeping grapes through. the winter in a fresh state. G. W. Caston, Barrie, some very fine samples in maple syrup and sugar. W. W. Hilborn, Ottawa, sample of Salem grape was shown that had been packed in fine, dry sand, and preserved their appearance to a remarkable degree, although the flavor was not quite equal to. freshly-gathered fruit. he Experimental Farm shows in raspberries Turner, Tyler, Souhegan, Chapman, Rancocas and a new seedling raspberry named Hubner, originated from wild berries grown in Northern Muskoka. It resembles Cuthbert in size and color, in quality equal if not better and a week earlier than that old stand- ard variety, and should receive a more extended trial. A number of interesting seedlings of red and black. rasps. originated by Professor Saunders. Among the number was one large red, about a week or ten days earlier than Cuthbert, fully as large, productive and promising; also a seedling of Davidson’s Thornless, a cap variety two or three days earlier and fully as large as Tyler, equally as good in quality, free from. thorns, as strong a grower and apparently as productive. A secdling black currant was also shown of large size, stem being long and well filled, ripening very evenly ; well worthy of trial. An interesting col- lection of fifty-eight photographs of the leading varieties of new and old strawberries grown on Experi- mental Farm, showing their exact size and form, was shown by W. W. Hilborn. Owing to the general. drouth, the samples of fresh fruit exhibited were scarcely up to the standard. All of which is respectfully submitted. J. P. WILLIAMS, WALLACE WOODROW,, W. W. HILBORN. A vote of thanks to the County of Prince Edward and to the inhabitants of Picton: for their kindness to the Association, was moved by Mr. Wright, seconded by Mr. Gibb, and responded to by Mr. Boulter, Mr. Dempsey, and Mr. Storey, Reeve of the township, after which the convention adjourned at noon. In the afternoon, upon invitation from Mr. Boulter, the delegates took a trip in a steam yacht to Glenora, a summer resort five miles east of Picton, noted for the “ Lake on the Mountain,” two hundred feet above the level of the waters of Lake Ontario and the Bay of Quinte. Lunch was served at the Glen House by Mrs. Comer, the proprietor, and after a few hours happily spent, the party returned in the evening to Picton, whence they dispersed. On the following day Mr. Boulter conducted a party to the famous sand-banks, some fourteen miles south-west of Picton, on the shores of Lake Ontario, and on returning the party took the traix at Bloomfield station for their homes. 143 APPENDIX. 1. SECRETARY’S PORTFOLIO. HYBRID SIBERIAN APPLES. BY CHAS. GIBB OF ABBOTSFORD. -The old names of “ Crab Apple” and pomme d’ornament, are no longer suitable for these fruits. The little berry-like crabs of Siberia, and their descendants, have been pollenized and re-pollenized on this continent, retaining the hardiness and fruitfulness of their female parent, the Siberian, yet bearing fruit in quality more like our best apples. In some cases, too, we have retained the thinness of skin, and the brisk sprightliness of flavor of the ‘Siberian, while largely increasing its size and entirely getting rid of its astringency. I have fruited 29 varieties, mostly from Minnesota and Wisconsin. The six best I will mention, in order of ripening. Early Strawberry (of Minn.). I recommend this for home use, as it ripens with Red Astrachan, and is better in quality than any apple I have which ripens at that season. When for the first time sent to the St. Hyacinthe market, nobody wanted it. It was sampled out to every one, and now and then somebody would buy a peck. Next week everyone was asking for “la petite pomme rouge.” Last year twelve barrels were sent to the St. Hyacinthe market and sold readily. Whitney's No. 20 (of Ills.), is a beautiful red little apple, rather than a crab, and only shows its Siberian ancestry in the texture of its flesh as it becomes mellow. It is of first quality as a dessert apple, better than Early Strawberry. Gibb. Raised by G. P. Peffer, of Pewaukee, Wis., from the Yellow Siberian Crab, fertilized by Fall Greenings. The skin isa bright deep yellow, sometimes bronzed in the sun. The flesh too is yellow. My friends are all fond of it and beg of me to send them some for canning. It cans like a plum. Brier’s Sweet (of Wis.). From Transcendent, pollenized by Bailey’s Sweet. It is sweet and has not the Siberian character of flesh. The tree suffers when young from aphides. Orange (of Minn.). A pale orange, thin skinned fruit of very fair quality, free from any astringency. Lake Winter. A seedling, by Mr. J. C. Plumb, of Milton, Wis. Of fine quality, and keeps till November or later. These six varieties are all hardy trees ; all young bearers, except Early Strawberry ; all heavy bearers; all good growers except Gibb; all entirely free from astringency except Gibb, in which it is very slight ; all of good quality as dessert fruits. This is not merely my own opinion. When my friends are strolling through my orchard tasting everything they like the looks of, even though there may be Fameuse and St. Lawrence and lots of other good apples, I find that they taste and re-taste and say they like these _ so-called crab apples. However, all these kinds except, perhaps Lake Winter, after becoming ripe dete- riorate quickly. This is the nature of the Siberian character of flesh. They should be marketed quickly. Of the other twenty-three varieties I have fruited my favorites would be Meeder’s Winter, Minnesota and Beeches Sweet ; and of the varieties I have seen but have not myself fruited, the Rose of Stanstead and Rottot. This latter is a St. Hilaire variety of deep color and good quality. For jelly we need acid crabs of fairly deép color, astringency does not matter. For canning slight astringency, as in the Montreal Waxen (known also as Queen’s Choice), cannot be tasted, though strongly astringent varieties like Hyslop and Transcendent, people usually soon get tired of. In the Western States the Siberian and its crosses have proved so subject to blight that their cultivation has been given up. Blight is rarely troublesome even in the warmer end of our province. 144 I would however, warn my fellow fruit-growers that a tiny crab can produce as good acodling worm as the largest apple, and the habit of growing a lot of poor crabs which are not worth picking, may be the means of spreading in a wholesale way the worst insect foe with which the apple grower has to contend. In conclusion I would recommend for trial in the colder climates of our province these fruits of semi-Siberian origin, and if you think I have over-rated their qualities, then, next September, send a deputation to Abbotsford, and await their report.—13th Report Montreal Horticultural Society. NEW VARIETIES OF GRAPES AND THEIR VALUE. BY W. MEAD PATTISON, CLARENCEVILLE, P. Q. As a general prelude I would say the summer of 1887 was unusually favorable not only for early ripening, but for exemption from any traces of mildew. An enemy has, however, appeared in the “English sparrow,” yearly becoming more destructive to the grape, not only in its embryo state but to the ripe fruit, forcing us to resort to bagging the clusters before they begin to ripen. The season was notable from favorable results in a few new varieties, while some spoken of with favor in former years have shown deficiencies. Numbers-of new varieties are yearly introduced and applauded by those pecuniarily interested, but an ‘insignificant number survive the trial, yet I believe the acme of improvement in out-door grapes is by no means attained, though the name of Rogers may for some time stand foremost for the number and value of his hybrids. The grape of the future must be of high flavor and purer quality! Consumers are not critical enough. They are inclined to judge from appearance and cheapness, not quality, but fruit dealers in the large cities of the United States say “people are beginning to discriminate, and yearly the better class of grapes are more in demand and the poorer at scarcely remunerative prices.” When the criterion is quality, more propagators of new varieties will bend their efforts in that direction, and the poor trash on our markets, in the shape of cheap grapes will be displaced by good fruit ; as yet this matter largely rests with the consumer. Few men have been nore fully alive to the new era approaching than A. J. Caywood & Son, of New York State, who have introduced three new varieties recently. We will now only deal with their Ulster Prolific and Duchess. The former a red grape has fruited here for three years, in size nearly twice that of Delaware, compact, medium sized bunch, in quality much preferable to Concord, with which we draw the comparison only as regards fruitfulness and vigor, it ripens here some time before it, and the canes being short jointed the vine may prove to bear more fruit in the same space ; if this conjecture is realized Ulster will be a very profitable market grape; as to keeping qualities it continues good through January. While in red varieties I will say that Jefferson, a very handsome and excellent grape, ripened with me last year, but later than Concord, from this fact it will be of very little value for general cultivation here. Mary continues to set its fruit imperfectly, consequently is of no value for market. Vergennes still very prolific and valued for winter use. Wyoming Red bears loose imperfect bunches, forbidding in appearance and foxy in flavor, but very early. Owasso is of excellent quality but bears imperfect clusters, ripening late. Challenge is of no value, so how can we judge by a name ? Of black varieties, ‘“‘ Jewel,” originated by Mr. Burr, of Kansas, U.S., by his system of natural fertilization by grouping the vines, claims special notice. Principal parent supposed to be Delaware, which it closely resembles in flavor, a trifle larger. Empire State and Niagara vines had a set-back in the winter of 1885-86, and have not fruited yet; both strong growers, requiring checking in season to properly ripen the wood. From what I have learned of Empire State it is highly esteemed for quality and earliness, but bears sparingly. Mr. Jack has for two years exhibited very fine specimens of Niagara which he must have had several years in cultivation. Mason’s Seedling, originated from Concord seed in Illinois, U.S. It has fruited for three years ; berry size of Concord, bunch not as showy, flavor of fruit much preferable ; 145 if it improves in bearing will be a very valuable acquisition. The white varieties— Prentiss, Hayes, Rickett’s Golden Gem, Lady Washington, Naomi, Undine, Faith, Grein’s Golden, Rommell’s July, Superior and Golden Drop, have proved here uncertain and of little value. Last year I discarded and dug up a larger number than heretofore. Classification of varieties popularly recognized as ‘‘ Standards,” given in order as to estimate of value here. Wuitr.—Lady, Belinda, Antoinette, Martha, Carlotta, Sweetwater, Purity, and Allen’s Hybrid. Buiack anp Purpite.—Champion and Hartford (only for earliness and market), Worden,~ Barry, Herbert, Aminia, Essex, Moore’s Early, Burnet, Eumelan, Concord, Belvidere, Rockland Favorite, Adirondack, Creveling, Whitdale, Senasqua, Peabody, Waverley, Cottage, Canada, Florence and Bacchus. Rep.—Delaware, Lindley, Massasoit, Rogers No. 8, Gaertner, Rogers No. 14, Vergennes, Agawam, Salem, Rogers No. 5, Brighton, Walter, Northern Muscadine, Rogers No. 30, and Underhill’s Seedling. It will be observed that some highly esteemed for quality are low down on the list, and others are given a prominence from the point of earliness. Defects, viz., lateness, unfruitfulness, imperfect setting, tendency to mildew, enfeebled roots and weak foliage, are taken into consideration. RUSSIAN APPLES FOR THE COLDER PARTS OF THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. BY MR. CHAS. GIBB, OF ABBOTSFORD, P. Q. Did it ever occur to you how few “tree-fruits,” that is, fruit bearing trees, we have, that are natives of this continent? Wehave no apple, except the sweet scented crab of the South and West. No pear. In plums we are better off; we have the wild plums of Canada and the North-Western States, the Chickasaws of the west and south, and the Beech Plum of the coast. Of cherries, we have the Choke Cherry, Bird Cherry and the Wild Black. We have mulberries, but no approach in quality to those of the old world. Persimmons, but not equal to the Kaki of Japan. We have a bitter orange, but no fig, pomegranate, peach, nectarine, quince or apricot, While the Chinese and Japanese and the Romans and other early people in the old world were slowly developing these fruits from their wild forms, we had an Indian population who lived by fishing and hunting. Had there been an aboriginal population like the Chinese or Japanese, horticultural in their tastes, then our wild grapes would have been fully equal to any in the world ; our crab apple at least better than it is; our haws the size of small apples ; our choke cherry free from astringency ; butternuts with shells as thin as Spanish walnuts; wild black cherries equal to the Black Tartarian, and wild plums fully equal to the Washington and the Green Gage. Where did our fruits come from? Where originally from, I will not enter into. Let as go back to the time when the peasants of Normandy and Brittany were gathering the seeds and perhaps the scions of the fruit they loved most in their native land before embarking on their long and perilous journey to New France. Later on the Englishman introduced his favorite fruits, the Scotchman his, and we soon had in New England and in Canada the fruits of the mild, moist portion of Western Europe. The uncertainty of these fruits of Western Europe in the colder parts of this continent, both in the Eastern States and on the Western prairies, directed attention to the colder districts of Eastern - Europe. The U. 8. Department of Agriculture at Washington imported from Dr. Regel, of St. Petersburgh, in 1870, 252 varieties of apples. These were planted and fruited upon the department grounds, but the climate of Washington was such that the latest of them ripened and dropped from the tree by August 4th. They were, however, widely distributed for six years, and in one year 100,000 packets were sent out. Many varieties proved to be Duchess. There were evidently many mistakes, attributed in the west to the carlessness of the Department, which, however, was not so. The collection at that time rather fell into disfavor. I will allude to this again. 10 (8. G.) 146 — Professor Budd, of the Iowa State Agricultural College, in 1879, imported from Dr. Regel, St. Petersburgh, 73 varieties, and from Dr. Schroeder, of the Agricultural Academy of Petrovskoe Rasumovskoe, near Moscow, about 154 varieties. Exact information about these apples we could not get. The only thing to be done was to go to Russia and get it. Some one had to go. Mr. Budd and I went. This wasin 1882. We found the Russian fruits not looked up by the Russians as we had expected. We found St. Petersburg and Moscow not specially favorable to orcharding, but 430 miles to the east of Moscow, in latitude 54°, 600 miles nearer the North Pole than Quebec, we found apple-growing the great commercial industry of the people. We wandered from village to village along the Volga in a little sail boat, then in a tarantass, a basket on wheels without. springs, with hay on the bottom, driven by three horses abreast ; sometimes living on black bread and sleeping on a bundle of hay. Here the winter temperature for the three mouths is 9° above zero, which is the mean for the winter quarter for a period of no less than fifty-nine years, Mean temperature for the winter and summer quarters for several stations in Quebec, with the average highest and lowest temperatures : MEAN TEMPERATURES. vie ae as 3 STATIONS. Winter. Summer. 23 22 a8 o& A | Se Temp A Temp AG ae 4 irae eG arias at a Aiiclore « oie alae wh co emeeteaa mak nex 15.9 | Ps vereke 6225) 41 eh. ee 89.7 | —22.9 AGLI COUGITIR gn chs eve F)sseveh a o\aTaye1cie' 816) s/o" ea elelaieierensietens roe 11.9 | —0.6 60.8 —0.3 96.3 —32.2 Sree re aati ache AO d Rie a TEs 5, Bk 14.5 | +4.7| 55.5 | —1.9 74.0 | —15.0 FATIEICOSEL, Ds Wis pE mere. osieis sisicee cine elelecie sna se ete Ss 17 —0.6 | 56.9 —0.3; 71.0 | —14.6 TU iGied Mohs thine Bape eo eee nora do oboe UB Etc aacoope oe 15.5 —1.0| 54.9 —0.4| 80.3 | —23.8. Cranbourne, Dorchester Co...............2scecees- 15.6°| —0.6 | 59.2 —0.3! 90.0 | —27.8 IDs areiteess IBS onogoenode pce se os Oabnn Te asoabas oe 13.3 | —0.3 | 92.2 | —20.5- The figures A and A’ represent a correction, which should be applied to the given mean for the statiom to reduce it to the mean of a larger number of years, and is derived from the observations at Quebec. That is nearly 7° colder than the city of Quebec. The temperature tables. which were published in my report in 1882, were very kindly prepared for me by Robt. H. Scott, Secretary of the Meteorological Office in London. To Prof. Carpmael, of Toronto, I am indebted for temperatures as herewith given for Chicoutimi, Cape Rosier, Anticosti, Father Point, Cranbourne and Dalhousie, N. B. Of these the lowest reading for the winter quarter is at Chicoutimi, and yet it is milder than Kazan in Russia by three degrees. Let me comfort you then with the fact, that in no part of the Province of Quebec ’ where we are likely to grow apples is it colder than in the extensive orchard regions of Kazan. You have great diversity of site in this Province. Choose your hill-sides, not your bottom lands, unless near large bodies of water, thus avoiding late spring and early autumn frosts ; and if possible plant where you have protection from prevailing winds. Too warm a southern exposure is often more risky than open exposure to the north. As. you go north your difficulties will increase, yet you have no such difficulties to cope with as they have on the Western prairies. To test the hardiness of the Russian apple trees, at their worst, in bleak, open prairie exposure, at the Minnesota State Experimentak Station at St. Anthony, near Minneapolis, 65 varieties were planted. The soil was rich, 147 and under good culture they made a growth in 1886 up to 20 and even 26 inches, which, however, ripened well before winter. The winter of 1886-87 was unusually severe. Not one variety started from its terminal buds. Sixteen varieties lost one inch or less of growth. Duchess killed back sometimes to the old wood, but usually started buds from the base of the new wood. The verdict was 16 varieties hardier than Duchess! Min- nesota experience is most valuable to us. The value of these experiments, carried on with scientific accuracy, as in these experimental stations, is very great. Allow me to digress a little to glance at some earlier attempts at experimental horticulture. Over two centuries ago, when the Portu- guesé, Dutch and Spaniards were founding colonies in the East Indies, after order had been established, one of the first things to be done was to plant a garden for the testing of food plants. These experiments were enlarged as the colony increased, and were the forerunners of the beautiful botanic gardens of the present day. A little over a hundred years ago when the British, French and Spaniards were fighting like tigers for the pos- session of the West Indian Islands, a French vessel laden with plants from the Isle of Bourbon, near Mauritius, to found a botanic garden in the West Indies, was taken by the British and towed into Port Royal, Jamaica, This was the beginning of the experimental work in that island. The Mango, an East Indian fruit, is now the commonest forest tree in Jamaica ; the banana, also an East Indian plant, a chief food plant of the West Indies. The East and West Indies have interchanged for over a hundred years. The enormous export fruit trade of the tropics is the result of this. That we have oranges and lemons, bananas and pineapples in our markets, at reasonable rates, is due to this. All the British colonies in the tropics and sub-tropics have (call them what you will) their testing grounds, botanic gardens, experimental stations. We have now at Ottawa a central experimental farm, begun over a year ago, and branch stations will be established, one for N. S. and N. B, at Nepan, 54 miles east of Amherst, N. S., one each for Man., N. W. T. and B. C. Prof. Saunders is just the man for such important work. But that Canada should have remained so long without any experimental station, is a fact without parallel in British colonial history. Fortunately for us we had good neighbors. The U.S. Departmeut of Agriculture have long been experimenting. (See their reports, beginning with their first report in 1847.) Oflate years State experimental stations, often under the State Agricultural Colleges, each taking a line of its own, are doing a grand, good work now, since the pas- sage of the “ Hatch Bill” by Congress, allowing $15,000 per annum to each State Agri- cultural College for such special work, we may expect still more important results. I said that the East and West Indies had interchanged their products for over one hundred years, but it was not till 1870 that a collection of the apples was sent from our like climate in the old world, viz., Russia, and then imported, not by us, but by the U.S. Government. This importation by the Department at Washington was received by Dr. Regel from many different places in Russia. Between 1861 and 1870 Dr. Regel had been. receiving scions and samples of fruit from 39 sources, though sometimes two or more in one place, and although not so thought at the time, this collection contained the greater part of the best apples of the colder parts of Russia. Prof. Budd, at the Iowa State - Agricultural College, has been importing ever since, gathering in quantity, propagating and scattering.in all directions. Thousands of growers are testing these Russian fruits, and it is a comfort to feel that one is not working alone, but that all are co-workers in a common cause. I have over 100 varieties of Russian and German apples on trial ; 75 varieties I have already planted into orchard, each tree labelled and in my orchard book, a note as to place from which each tree was received, so that whatever should happen my link in the chain should still hold good. _ The introduction of these Russian apples has been beset with drawbacks, nomencla- ture is uncertain in Russia, and varieties have been propagated by Russian names spelled in all sorts of queer ways, or by translation either unmusical or wholly wrong. - The last report of the American Pomological Society contains lists of these fruits imported from Russia and Germany written by me. This work was undertaken by the request of that Society and appears as a suggestion to our authoritative body. A similar report, but in the alphabetical order, has been made out by Hon. T. T. Lyon, President 148 of the Michigan State Horticultural Society, for the report of the Division of Pomology of the U. 8. Department of Agriculture. Thus my suggestions have become fixed and unchangeable ; that is, owing to their appearance in the American Pomological Society’s report and at the same time by Mr. Lyon in U.S. report, it will be found unadvisable to make any changes except for some glaring mistake. Thus another drawback is being removed. Tam, I find, specially asked for a short list best adapted to our colder climates. I give this with a good deal of hesitation, from unripe experience, but give it in part from their behavior in my own orchard, and in part from trees I have seen in fruiting in Wis- consin and elsewhere in the U. 8. In order of ripening, (i) either Yellow Transparent, or Thaler (Charlottenthaler) ; (ii) Raspberry (Malinovka) ; (iii) Titovka; (iv) Golden White; (v) Longfield; (vi) Arabka (of Ellwanger and Barry.)—J3th Annual Report Montreal Horticultural Society. THE NATIVE PLUMS OF THE NORTH-WESTERN STATES. BY MR. CHAS. GIBB, OF ABBOTSFORD, P.Q. A My first efforts to grow plums proved failures, I now succeed in having a crop every year. I began in 1872 by planting those varieties of the European plum which had done the best (and that means only fairly well) in the sheltered city gardens of Montreal. Lombard bore one glorious crop; Bradshaw a few now and then; Washington bore a few and died. A large black, like Quackenboss, also bore a few specimens several years. So has another like Coe’s Golden Drop. A large number of varieties died before fruiting, but as many I had were not true to name, these may not have been the kinds I bought them for. Rev. Canon Fulton, of Maratina, Huntingdon, sent me a variety of Damson, it bore a few and died. Later Mr. James Brown, of Montreal, sent me Corse’s Nota Bene which has borne but one plum and will not live much longer. He also sent me Dictator and Corse’s Sauvageon, but they did not seem to thrive. Ihave Moore’s Arctic, but their unthrifty condition may be owing to the dried state of the trees when I received them. I have also the Prunus Simonii, of China, a fruit flat like a pomme grise. The tree is not hardy enough. Two years ago I imported from Europe a number of varieties, especially of the prune type of plum, for in some cases the prune is found to be hardier than the plum ; for let me remark that in Europe men plant their gardens or roadsides with “ prunes” or plums, just as in California they plant out their acres with “raisins” or grapes. I have several varieties of the Russian plums. The Abbotsford Fruit Growers’ Association has twice imported from Moscow, but they are too young to report upon. But I must here draw your attention to the fact that we have not in this country the plums of the Volga, and of the other colder districts of Russia. Mr. Shroeder, of the Agricultural Academy at Petrovskoe Rasumovskoe, Moscow, received the plums he sent to Abbotsford and to Ames, Iowa, from Poltava, a comparatively mild region. Dr. Regel of St. Petersburg, has sent out three varieties to this country, from where obtained he was not able to say, and beyond this but one really Russian variety from Central Russia has yet reached us and that is the Moldavka of Vorouesh. It is much to be regretted that the plums of Volga are not obtainable here, and as many of them are to be found only in little out-of-the-way villages like Kluchichi and Tenki, in the Province of Kanzan, it will be many long years before we may hope to have them. However, we have another race of plums which have proved a decided success at Abbotsford, viz., the improved varieties of the native plums of the Western and North- Western States. I have about ten Wisconsin plum trees which were the roots of root grafts planted in 1873. They bore five good crops in succession, took a year’s rest and have borne almost each year since. They are nice for eating and pretty good for cooking, but when canned the astringency in the skin and stone becomes too pronowncé and one a Vere - oy ee ae a Soa he eae 4 Pw > 4 a ee ee et ee r b ae ae yt 2 ye wel ee ree ern Perens } Y ) SUR WY \ LEAHY YY, i CLOZ CLS Section showing Conidiospores (5) f Transve ction $$ Via T erse sectic atte of the Kmot Conidiospores enlarged Black Kmot as it appears On the tree Section showing Mycelium, permeating } Stem previous to the appearance of = § = — to § = ez = =7= SS = —— B ct M4 BeBpos aan zn 0° 5902 om oS ° 55 =, aS Se Le 4 @® m2 io 066 roo} larged Ascospores i hyyes — SSS ~ ZN See - WANT Qe Prema Ascospores Pycnidio- spores Spermagonia germinating b containing Spermatea Pirate LV, PLUM KNOT FUNGUS, by Pror. Panton. See page 149. 149 soon gets tired of them. They are the Western form of our Prunus Americana. I have also the DeSoto. Little trees of it bore their first crop last year. It is the best in quality of these P. Americana, and I heartily recommend it for trial. I have about eight trees of Miner, a Chickasaw, or a cross with it, which have borne moderate or light, but. yearly crops without any failure for at least eight years. The fruit is rather large, dark dull red, and hasa flavor like a muskmelon. It ripens October Ist and keeps till November Ist. I had about six bushels last year, and owing to its lateness it sells well at 80 cents per bushel, but I do not recommend anyone to grow it who lives further north than Abbotsford. Basset has fruited with me, but is small, astringent and inferior. Of varieties which I have not fruited but which I have seen and tasted on the grounds of the Iowa Agricultural College, I would specially mention Mooreman, a small red fruit of fine quality, and Wolf, a large, red moderately juicy freestone, with heavy rank foliage. Of others I find Weaver spoken of as doing well in Minnesota, and Maquoketa, Speer, Wyant and Rollingstone promise well on the College farm at Ames, Iowa. THE BLACK KNOT. BY PROF. J. H. PANTON, M.A., GUELPH. One of the most troublesome diseases of vegetable origin affecting the fruit trees of Ontario at the present time is the well known so-called black knot. Though it has been the subject of much study, and much has been learned regarding its life history, still fruit- growers, to a great extent, are helpless to withstand its attacks. The duty devolving upon me in reading this paper before you, is to open up a dis- cussion on this troublesome pest. Its attacks seem to be confined largely to the plum and cherry trees, few of which seem to escape its destructive influence. An examination of the “ knot” at an early stage of its development shows innumer- able small transparent threads only seen by the aid of the microscope. These branch among the cells which compose.the tissue of the inner bark of the tree and form the so- called Myceliwm, or vegetable part of the fungus. (6) The threads become very intricately twisted together in bundles as development proceeds, beginning in the cambium layer of the bark and radiating outwards. As spring advances, the threads increase in size, reach @ more matured condition, and the knot presents a somewhat velvety appearance later in the season. This is the result of the threadlike structures sending up innumerable short- jointed filaments (Conidia) on the ends of which are borne egg-shaped spores known as Conidiospores (see fig. 1). These are very small, requiring the aid of a microscope to see them. When ripe they are readily disturbed and may be blown long distances by the wind and thus reach new places become the origin of knots similar to those from which they came. This mode of reproduction in the knot continuing till the summer is well advanced, when another class of spores begins to develop and reach maturity about February. The surface of the knot during winter shows pores which can be seen by the naked eye; these open into cavities, on the walls of which are two kinds of structures, one consisting of slender filaments (paraphyses) the use of which are not known, the other. club-shaped (asc7) ; in the latter are developed, toward the close of winter, the ascopores, (see fig. 3), usually eight in each ascus, at the end of which is an opening through which the spores pass and become new starting points for}the fungus when they reach proper conditions for development. : Other cavities also are found among those with the asci ; these contain very minute oval spores divided by cross partitions into three parts, and borne on slender stalks (see- fig. 2). These are the so-called Stylospores, the use of which is not known, but generally believed to be concerned in the perpetuation of the species. Still, other cavities exist containing exceedingly slender filaments (spermatia), (see fig. 4) also concerned in repro- duction. ‘They are seen in the knot during winter and spring, and are much less common than the conidiospores or stylospores. 150 Interspersed amongst the cavities already referred to, one finds from time to time spaces more flattened than these, and often instead of appearing oval, seem almost triangular. They are lined with short, delicate filaments, which end in a minute oval body. These bodies are produced in great numbers and are discharged in masses, being held together by a sort of jelly. This form is known as the pycenidiospores, and also seem to be connected with the process of reproduction (see fig. 5). Thus, you perceive, we have no less than five different kinds of reproductive organs connected with the fungus which causes black knot, viz.: conediospores, ascospores, stylospores, spermatia, and pycnidvospores, all more or less concerned in the perpetuation of this destructive disease. For some time before the true nature of this disease was known it was generally believed that the cause of the “knot” was the presence of insects, but since the life history of this fungus has become a subject of study, and its various stages of growth made out as already described, the insect theory has been abandoned, The following reasons for believing that the knot is not caused by insects might be remembered : 1. The knots do not resemble the galls made by an insect. 2. Although insects or remains of ‘insects are generally found in old knots, i in most cases no insects at all are found in them when young. 3. The insects found are of several species, which are also found on trees which are never affected by the knot. 4, We never find black knot without the fungus sphewria morbosa, and the mycelial threads of that fungus is found in slightly swollen stem long before anything like a knot has made its appcane, nor is this fungus known to occur anywhere except with the knots. The morello cherry seems most susceptible, and it is supposed that the disease has originated from some of the wild cherries rather than the wild plum. Notwithstanding the subject of black knot has received so much attention, little advance has been made in its extirpation, other than the cutting the knot off as soon as observed. When the knot makes its appearance the branch should be cut off a short distance below the slight swelling of the stem, which is seen just below the knot. When cut away, burn the branches to prevent the spores from spreading the disease. These spores, it will be remembered, are microscopic and in great numbers ; besides, if the branches are not destroyed the ascospores will ripen during the winter and perpetuate the trouble. The most favorable time to cut off the knots is late in autumn, before the ascospores are ripe, but as the conidiospores ripen in early summer, if knots are seen in spring they should be cut away at once. Not only should deceased branches of cultivated cherries and plums be removed, but also the choke cherry, bird cherry, and wild plum in the vicinity of orchards be destroyed. . Some recommend the application of turpentine to the knot ; this requires to be done carefully, or the neighboring parts of the branch will be injured, and it is questionable if the results would be favorable. If the knot is large enough to be treated in this way it is likely nothing short of removal would check the spread of the fungus. Unfortunately little regard is paid to the law which requires affected trees to be destroyed ; they are thus scattering millions of spores yearly which are spreading the disease to all parts of the province ‘until the black knot has become almost universal, and in every locality these blighted trees stand as silent monuments of the indifference and ignorance of those who should co-operate in fighting against a common foe. 151 THE MILDEWS ON THE GRAPE-VINE. BY DR. C. V. RILEY. There are very many fungi known to attack the grape-vine, as is evidenced by a glance at such works as “ Fungi parassiti dei Vitigni,” by Dr. Romueldo Pirotta (Milan, 1877), or “ Die Pilze des Weinstockes,” by Felix von Thiimen (Vienna, 1878). But the two principal fungi, both of them popularly called ‘“ mildews,” which interest the grape grower, on account of the extensive injury they cause, are the Uncinula spiralis (Berkeley & Curtis), and the Peronospora viticola (Berkeley). Any popular statement in reference to grape-vine mildews, in order to be accurate, must take cognizance of these two species which occur ordinarily under opposite atmospheric conditions. Failure to do so has wrought much confusion in the fugitive literature on the subject. As popular distinguish- ing terms, it would be well to call the former the “ Powdery Grape-vine Mildew,” and the latter the ‘‘ Downy Grape-vine Mildew.” It is my purpose here to deal chiefly with the latter, but it will be desirable first to briefly consider the characteristics of the former, that the ditierences between the two may the more readily appear. THE PowpERY GRAPE-VINE MILDEW. This is the Uncinula spiralis (Berkeley & Curtis), and the conidial form has tong been known by the name of Oidium Tuckeri (Berkeley). General Appearance.—This particular fungus produces a white, powdery appearance on the upper surface of the leaves, which at first looks not unlike dust, and which is much less conspicuous on the lower surface. Beginning in spots, these grow larger and larger until they cover the whole leaf, and include even the young stems and berries. Structural Characteristics.—The powdery spots consist of mycelial threads attached to the epidermis of the leaf by suckers. These filaments have a diameter of .004 mm. Portions of this mycelium rise up from the surface of the leaf and become constricted or intersected, thus forming cells. As these cells, which are the conidial spores, multiply, the terminal ones enlarge, ripen, and drop off, so that a succession of conidial spores is formed. The spores germinate at once by pushing out a germinating tube, generally at one end. Late in the summer and autumn, the perithecia and asci are formed, ripening about the first of October. These are the resting or winter spores, and are small, black bodies occurring on both surfaces of the leaf and on the stems. They consist of an opaque sac with a cellular wall, from which a number of appendages radiate, to from three to five times the length of the diameter of the perithecium, and some of them either uncinlate or spiral at tip. The perithecium measures from .07 to .12 mm. in diameter, and the number of appendages varies from 15 to 32. Inside the perithecia are the asci or sacs, which contain the spores. The asci vary from four to eight in number, nominally six, the spores also vary in number, the average being six. The Uncinula spiralis, therefore, appears in two phases—first, as a white, flocculent mold; secondly, as perithezia, with more or less tuncinate, or spiral appendages. Variation in Habit.—One of the most interesting facts in connection with this fungus is that only the conidial form, known as Oidium Tuckeri, occurs, or is so far known in Europe. There is some question as to the actual specific identity of Oidium Tuckeri, as found in Europe, and the conidial stage of Uncinula spiralis, as found in this country. The bulk of opinion is, I think, that they are identical, for while Von Thiimen, in his Fungi Pomicola, and in his Pilze des Weinstockes, follows Fukel in giving Sphe- rotheca castagnei. Lev. as a synonym of Oidium Tuckeri, thus implying that this last is the conidial form of the former. Fukel merely makes the conjecture without positive proof, and there is great improbability in the conjecture being correct. We have, in fact, in this case, so far as the evidence goes, one somewhat parallel to that of the Grape-vine Phylloxera. The gall-making form of this insect upon the leaf is of very common occur- ence, and the form most easily observed in America ; whereas in Europe the species very 152 rarely produces the gall. Yet the historic evidence is conclusive as to the introduction from America of‘ Phylloxera vastatrix, and almost as conclusive as to the similar intro- duction of this Oidium ; and, to my mind, they both furnish admirable illustrations of a change of habit in an organism sufficiently marked that, without the historic evidence, the question of the exact specific identity of the parent, and its transcontinental issue, might well be raised. The interesting question, philosophically considered, is why, if the winter spore is necessary to the perpetuation of the Uncinula in America, the species can propagate for an indefinite period without it in Europe? Effect on the Vine.—The fungus is less injurious to our hardier native grape-vines than to the European Vitis vinifera and hybrids of it. Hence it is more to be dreaded in California and in Europe than in the Eastern United States. It also prevails most in a dry atmosphere. REMEDIES, Sulphur is well known to be one of the most satisfactory remedies against this fungus, and is in universal application where the disease prevails. It is generally applied dry, by means of bellows, though, it seems to me, the wet method would have advantages with the use of the cyclone nozzle. Mr. A. Vitch, of New Haven, Conn., has found that in green-houses the sulphur may be advantageously applied by mixing it with linseed-oil to the consistency of paint, and brushing it on the flues or hot-water pipes. Mr. Wm. Saunders, the Horticulturist of the Department of Agriculture, has for many years used with great satisfaction, a weak solution of lime and sulphur, obtained by pouring water on one-half bushel of lump lime and ten pounds of sulphur, and then diluting for use. THe Downy GRAPE-VINE MILDEW. General Appearance.—The other mildew, namely, the Peronospora, shows itself on the underside of the leaves in the form of a small patch of whitish down, and sends its mycelium into the adjacent tissues, destroying the parts, which scorch and turn brown, as if sunburnt. It has been known by various popular names, as “blister of the leaf,” “blight,” and so on. It generally escapes attention in its earlier stages, and experience shows that it is most destructive where the dews are heavy, or in continued damp, rainy weather. This particular mildew is the Peronospora viticola (Berkeley & Curtis), De- Barry having first referred to it as Botrytis viticola. Structural Characteristics.—The mycelial threads or hyphe, are about .01 mm. in diameter, somewhat larger in the stems and petioles than in the leaves. They are found everywhere except in the wood proper, but particularly in the tissues of the leaves. Their contents are granular and somewhat oily, and cross partitions so characteristic of the Uncinula, are rare. Just beneath the stomata of the leaves, the hyphe are particularly abundant. Those which are to bear the conidia pass through the stomata and grow more rapidly than the rest, ramifying and reaching from .3 to .6 mm. in heighth, and bearing the conidia on the tips of the branchlets. The conidia are oval and obtuse, varying in size from .012 to .03 mm. in diameter. Germination takes place with great rapidity whenever there is sufficient moisture. Conidia placed in water become swollen and some- what segmented in an hour. The segments become oval bodies, collect at the distal end of the conidia, rupture the wall in a short time and escape, swimming off as zdospores, each with two cilie. Each conidium produces, on an average, five or six zdospores, though the number is quite variable. They vary also in shape, and from .008 to .01 mm. in length. They move about from 15 to 20 minutes; then come to rest, when the cilia drops off, and a new mycelium develops: from the side. The winter spores, or dospores, are found in September and October, in discolored and shriveled parts of the leaves. They are spherical, .03 mm. in diameter, with a thick, smooth, yellow cell-wali. They fall to the ground with the leaves and lie dormant till spring. So far as I can find, the actual steps by which the winter spores are produced, have not been observed in this species, or for that matter, in the Uncinula, but as the process 153 is known in the order Perisporiace, we may confidently assume that they result, later in the season, from the union of the contents of two cells, or hyphe, 7. ¢., they are of sexual origin. We thus have, as in the Uncinula, both summer and winter spores, The summer spores develop outside the leaf, and germinate rapidly as soon as moistened by rain or dew. Consequently, during a wet summer, the spread of the fungus is extraordinarily rapid, so that within a few days a large vineyard becomes infested. The winter spores are found in the interior of the dry leaves, and hibernate within those on the ground. In summer they again get on to the young leaves by the agency of animals, wind, and rain. Sulphur, as a means of checking or remedying this particular mildew, has proved a failure, and, indeed, no satisfactory remedy has, until recently, been found, though pro-. phylactic means, such as those recommended by Mr. Wm. Saunders, namely, the shelter- ing of the vines by a board covering over the trellis, have been more or less successful. The fact that no satisfactory remedy existed until lately, was well illustrated by the discussion which followed the reading of a paper by Mr. F. S. Earle, at the meeting of the American Horticultural Society, at New Orleans, last February, on “ Fungoid Diseases of the Strawberry.” * The concensus of opinion was that we have no remedy for most of the fungus diseases of plants. That this was, unfortunately, a true state of the case, practical cultivators will admit ; for though intelligent treatment will check the growth of the black knot, and the proper use of lime and sulphur will check Erysiphe and Uncinula, these are about the only fungus diseases which we can control with satis- faction and certainty. Prof. G. C. Caldwell is reported to have stated about a year ago, at a meeting of the New York Horticultural Society, that mildew could be prevented by soaking the stakes in the vineyard in a solution of blue vitrol ; but as that report doés not specify which mildew was intended, I know not how authoritative it is. During my visit to South France, in the summer of 1884, I was strnck with the prevalence of this Downy Mildew in most of the vineyards, and the French grape growers around Montpellier felt far more anxiety as to the consequence of this Peronos- pora than they did as to the work of the Grape-vine Phylloxera. They feel now, that with the aid of our American stocks, they can control and defy this underground pest ; but the Peronospora, which was a few years ago unknown to them, but which has been introduced with the American vines, has so far entirely baffled them, as, I believe, it has baffled our own grape growers. In an address which I had the honor to deliver before the Central Society of Agri- culture of the Department of Hérult, in June, 1884, and which treated principally of insecticides and insecticide appliances, I took occasion, in view of the interest then felt in this mildew, to recommend the use of the following as a promising fungicide: The ordinary milk-kerosene emulsion, prepared after the formula given in my late official reports as United States Entomologist, with from two to five per cent. of carbolic acid, and the same percentage of glycerine, and then diluted in 20 to 50 parts of water to one of the emulsion, and sprayed on to the under surface of the leaves by means of a cyclone nozzle of small aperature, so as to render the spray as fine as possible. The suggestion of the carbolic acid was due to the results obtained by Prof. Gustav Foéx, Director of the Ecole Nationale d’ Agriculture, at that place. _ It was very gratifying to find this recommendation at once acted upon, and up to the time when I left Montpellier, with satisfactory results. Reports of further trials showed also, that this mixture so sprayed at once arrests the spread of the mildew. I was well aware of the difficulty of dealing satisfactorily with a fungus which may, in a single night, without any warning, manifest itself all over a vineyard; but it isa great point gained to know how to check it, even if the knowledge may at times be of little practical avail in large vineyards. But much good, nevertheless, resulted, and “‘ Le Pro- cede Riley” was much written about in La Vigne Americaine, and other viticultural journals a year ago. However, the experience of the past year in France has furnished a remedy which,-from all accounts, is in every way satisfactory, because it not only destroys direct, but acts as a prophylactic. * Many writers on mycological subjects misuse this term ‘‘fungoid ” (which means something not a fungus, but fungus-like), in speaking of true fungi or of a fungus disease. 154 My attention was drawn some months ago, to two articles by C. B. Cerletti, pub- lished the 15th and 30th of August, in the Rivista di viticoltwra ed Enologia Italiana, announcing the success of hydrate, or slacked lime. My friends, M. J. Lichtenstein and P. Viala, of Montpellier, the latter having charge of the Laboratoire de viticulture at the Ecole Nationale @ Agriculture de Montpellier, soon thereafter communicated to me the discoveries made. M. Velicogna, in a report in the Actes et Memoirs dela Societe imperiale et royale d’ Agriculiure de Gortiz, for*September and October, 1885, has also discussed the effect of hydrate of lime at length, his formula being 24 kilogrammes of the lime (chaux éteinte) in 100 litres of water. The general tone of the experience with this hydrate of lime is satisfactory, but a mixture of hydrate of lime and sulphate of copper is still more conclusive, and numerous communications to viticultural journals and to the French Academy, attest the complete efficacy of the remedy. It has been the custom in some of the wine-growing parts of France to sprinkle lime and verdigris upon those vines which border an the roadside, as a means of warding off depredators. It was found that vines so spattered were not infested by Peronospora, while the rest of the vineyard might be attacked. This dis- covery led to further experiments. Various formule have been given, but the most important articles are those by M. A. Perrey, in the Comptes Rendus de (Ac. d. Sc., Oct. 5, 1885, and by M. A. Millardet in the same publication, and reproduced in the Messager Agricole du Midi for Nov. 10, 1885. From this latter article I condense the following: Dissolve eight kilogrammes (18 pounds) of ordinary sulphate of copper, in 100 litres (about 22 gallons) of any kind of water (well, rain, or river), in a separate vessel. Mix 30 litres (about 6? gallons) of water, and 15 kilogrammes (about 34 pounds) of coarse lime, so as to make a milk of lime. Then mix with this the solution of sulphate of copper. These will form a bluish paste. Pour a portion of the mixture in a bucket or other vessel, thoroughly shaking it, and brushing the leaves with a small broom, taking care not to touch the grapes. There is no fear of any accident, not even to the most tender portion of the vines. The treatment was made from the 10th to the 20th of July. At some points the operation was repeated a second time at the end of August, but without much advantage. It was, therefore, demonstrated that one application was sufficient. The mixture, when dry, sticks very fast to the leaves. After the vines were treated there were several showers the beginning and end of August, also the frequent Septem- ber rains, notwithstanding which, the evidence of the efficacy of the treatment, where no more than half the leaves were touched by the mixture, could easily be detected. That this remedy will prove effectual for the many other similar white mildews on other plants, caused by other Peronospore, there can be little doubt. The same fear of danger as to the effect of this fungicide on the vine and on the wine, has been experienced in Europe as we experienced in this country in the early use of Paris green as an insecticide, and experience alone will settle the amount of danger there may be in the use of this new remedy. BIBLIOGRAPHY. I know of no one who has more fully recognized the practical bearings on the best method of dealing with these two fungi than Mr. Wm. Saunders. In the report of the Commissioner of Agriculture for the year 1861, p. 495, ff., he has an article: ‘‘ Remarks on Grape Culture with reference to Mildew, hoth on the native and foreign varieties,” and in a number of subsequent reports, as those of 1864, ’65, ’66, ’67. ’69, ’81-2, and ’83, he has dealt cither at length or incidentally on the essential facts that the Uncinula is encouraged by a dry atmosphere, and the Peronospora by a moist atmosphere. His experience shows that the nature of the soil or mode of cultivation has but little influence ‘on the fungus, and that protection from above, as by covered trellis, is about the best prevention of the Peronospora; also that grape-vines with downy foliage are more susceptible to the Peronospora than those with smooth foliage. His experience is very well summed up in a statement of it furnished for publication in my 5th report on the Insects of Missouri, p. 70 (foot note). ay 155 Of the writers on the structure and development of these mildews, Dr. Thomas Taylor was one of the earliest in this country, and found the perithecium of the Uncinula on the European vine. His chief articles are contained in the reports of the Department of Agriculture for 1871 and 1874, but are marred by confusion in both text and plates. For accurate details the student should more particularly consult the following : W. G. Farlow (whom I have mostly followed) ‘‘ Notes on Some Common Diseases Caused by Fungi,” (Bull. Bussey Inst. Vol. II., part II., 1877, pp. 106-114) ; also, “ On the American Grape-vine Mildew ” (Ibid. for 1876, pp. 415-425) ; Maxime Cornu, “ Le Per- onospora des Vignes,” Paris, 1882; B. D. Halsted, ‘The White Mildews” (Proc. 19th Session Am. Pom. Soc., for 1883, p. 87); and Wm. Trelease, “The Grape Rot” (Trans. Wis. Hort. Soc., 1885, pp. 196-199). SUMMARY. We thus have, indigenous to this country, two mildews that are more particularly destructive to the grape-vine : 1. The Uncinula spiralis, or the Powdery Grape-vine Mildew, flourishing most in a dry atmosphere, not particularly destructive to our hardier native grapes, and easily con- trolled by use of sulphur. It develops chiefly on the upper side of the leaf, and produces simple ovoid summer spores, and more complex and ciliate winter spores, which are found upon both the leaf and the cane. Introduced into Europe many years ago, accord- ing to trustworthy evidence, it is only known there in the conidial form as Odium Tuckeri, and works more injury than it does with us. 2. The Peronospora viticola, or the Downy Grape-vine Mildew, which ramifies its mycelium in the substance of the leaf, and even of the fruit, and develops most in moist or wet weather. It produces its summer spores on the underside of the leaf, and a winter spore in the tissues of the dry and fallen leaves. It is not amenable to sulphur, but is checked by a diluted kerosene emulsion, in which a small amount of carbolic acid is mixed, but far more effectually checked, and even prevented, by a mixture of slacked lime and sulphate of copper. This should be applied early in the season, say in June, so as to act asa preventive, while the gathering and burning of the old leaves in winter time will assist. This species is more injurious with us than the other, and is especially trouble- some on the European vines. It was first introduced into Europe in 1877, when it was found in Hungary, and has since spread through the greater portion of France, Italy, Switzerland, Austria, etc. ARBOR DAY. Believing that the following from Bulletin No. 33, of the Agricultural College of Michigan may be of service to our high and public schools in making the exercises of Arbor Day more interesting, the secretary includes it in this appendix, with the remark that a similar exercise was performed with much success on last Arbor Day at the Grimsby High School, Mr. C. W. Mulloy, B.A., head master. _ The exercise presented below was first given by the pupils of the Grand Rapids schools on the evening of January the 26th, 1888, in connection with the Forestry Con- vention in that city. Though no trees were planted, the presentation of a literary pro- gramme designed to be suitable. for adoption by the schools of the State was very creditable. The exercises assumed the nature of a convention of trees. The meeting was called to order by Norway Pine, who moved the election of a chairman and secretary. After the election followed general speech-making, interspersed with music and songs, Each tree set forth in a few brief sentences his characteristics, properties, uses and various values. The exercises lasted nearly an hour, enlisting much applause, and all agreeing with one accord, at the finish, that they were only ‘‘ too short.” : 156 A CoNVENTION oF Forest TREEs. Norway Pine (Louie).—Fellow trees of Michigan, to organize this meeting I move the election of White Oak as chairman. (Seconded.) All who favor this motion please say aye. (Unanimous vote.) Those who are opposed will say no. The ayes have it and White Oak will take the chair. White Oak (Julius).—Fellow trees, the object of our meeting is to consider what- ever may be to our best interests in the forests of Michigan. I1t is a subject of great importance to the State and to all of us, and we hope to gain much valuable informa- tion from each other and to hear from every one present. We have gathered from all parts of the State for this conference. As we should keep a permanent record of our proceedings, and as the newspapers will probably wish to publish our papers and discussions, I think a secretary will be needed to take the minutes of this meeting. Beech (Harry).—I nominate Chestnut (Lillie) to act as secretary. (Seconded.) White Oak.—All who favor the nomination last made will say aye. Those who are opposed will say no. The ayes have it and Chestnut is elected secretary. (She takes her place.) White Oak.—Our musician, Pine (Bessie), has kindly arranged the musie for us. She sings only when the spirits move her. We may know when that is by the peculiar swaying of her head. At the swaying let us suspend business and listen. She moves— we will hear ‘The Echoes from the Forest.” White Oak.—We are now ready for discussion. (Several trees rising at once.) White Oak.—Tulip tree has the floor. Tulip Tree (Herman).—Fellow trees, Iam glad to have this opportunity to plead my qualifications as an ornamental tree. I grow to a great size and height, and have shining, queer-shaped leaves, and large tulip-shaped blossoms which remind you of the sunny South, where my sisters, the Magnolias, live. Burr Oak (Joseph).—I should like to ask Tulip tree of what use he is? Michigan people have a right to demand of us both usefulness and beauty. ¢ Tulip Tree.—I am not only valuable as an ornamental shade tree, but I also furnish excellent timber for carriage bodies, furniture and finishing houses. Years ago my fore- fathers were numerous south of the Grand River Valley, and supplied wood for laths, shingles and lumber in the place of the white pine. Our family is a small one, represented in Michigan by a single species. White Oak.—We shall be glad to hear from any members of the Oak family who live in Michigan. (Sixteen members rise.) - White Oak.—This is certainly a large family. I recognize Chestnut as entitled to the floor. What claims have you to rank in the Oak family ? wee Chestnut.—All botanists of the present day agree that the Beech, the Ironwood, the blue Beech, and the Hazels and Chestnuts are first cousins to the Oaks. I live in four counties in the south-east part of the State and am well known for valuable timber and a good crop of edible nuts. Beech.—Upon my smooth, gray bark many a heart history has been carved. The poet Campbell tells it so beautifully : ‘** Thrice twenty summers have I stood, . Since youthful lovers in my shade Their vows of truth and rapture paid, And, on my trunk’s surviving frame, Carved many a long forgotten name.” And here is another beautiful thing from Whittier : ‘“T have always admired the taste of the Indians around Sebago Lake, who, when their chief died, dug round the beech tree, swaying it down, and placed his body in the rent, and then let the noble tree fall back into its original place, a green and beautiful monument for a son of the forest.” I am one of the commonest and well-known trees in Michigan. 157 Burr Oak,—Ten of us Oaks, out of about 300, live in this State. Brother White Oak is by far the most common and well- -known, He is the senior member of our family and has attained a very great age. He never thrives in perfection except in a good soil and in a temperate climate. The Michigan people are proud that so many of our family live with them. Tulip Tree.—White Oak is certainly loyal to his family, but I should like to hear’ the uses of his tree. Burr Oak.—Every particle of him is useful, even to his ashes. His bark is used ' for tanning leather ; his wood is hard, compact, heavy, tough and durable, good for heavy waggons, plows, railroad ties, fence posts, ship timber, furniture, and finishing the interior of houses. Swamp White Oak (Leona).—As much of my timber is so nearly like that of White Oak, and often passes for it, I will say, as a tree, “ I am beautiful in every stage of my growth ; at first, light, slender, delicate and waving ; at last, broad, massive and grand, but always graceful.” Chestnut Oak (James).—Emerson says of White Oak: ‘As an ornament to the landscape, or as a single object, no other tree is to be compared with it, in every period of its growth, for picturesqueness, majesty, and inexhaustible variety of beauty. When standing alone it throws out its mighty arms with an air of force and grandeur which have made it everywhere to be considered the fittest emblem of strength and power of resistance. Commonly the oak braves the storm to the last, without yielding, better than any other tree. The limbs go out at a great angle and stretch horizontally to a vast distance.” Laurel Oak (John).—The famous A. J. Downing said: ‘There are no grander or more superb trees than our American oaks. We are fully disposed to concede it the first rank among the denizens of the forest. As an ornamental object we consider the oak the most varied in expression, the most beautiful, grand, majestic and picturesque of all deciduous trees.” Black Jack Oak (Herbert).—Poetry, history, mythology and romance abound in references to the oak. I should like to hear from our fellow trees some common quota- tions in reference to the oak. White Ash (Myrtie).—‘‘ The unwedgeable and gnarled oak.” Black Ash (Ella).—‘ The old oaken bucket.” Sugar Maple (Louise).—“ Jove’s own tree that holds the woods in awful sovereignty.” Red Maple (Anna),—“ A goodly oak, whose boughs were mass’d with age.” Scarlet Oak (Ben.)—‘ King of the woods.” Blue Ash (Amy).—“ Thy guardian oaks, my country, are thy boast.” Silver Maple (Kate).—“ The monarch oak, the patriarch of trees.” Butternut (Burke).—‘‘ The oak for grandeur, strength and noble size, excels all trees that in the forest grow.” Black Walnut (Frank).—Tall oaks from little acorns grow,” Buttonwood (Harrison).— “Woodman, forbear thy stroke ! Cut not its earth-bound ties ; Oh, spare that aged oak, Now towering to the Skies !” Sassafras (Henry).— ‘** Behold yon oak, How stern he frowns.” Pepperidge (Walter).—“ The glory of the woods.” Buckeye (Samuel).— ** Proud monarch of the forest ! That once, a sapling bough, Didst quail far more at evening’s breath Than at the tempest now. Strange scenes have passed, long ages roll’d Since first upon thy stem, Then weak as osier twig, spring set Her leafy diadem.” 158 ee eee Red Oak (Lulu).—I begin to feel my pride rising and hope White Oak will give me a chance to quote a poem written in honor of one of our family. White Oak.—(Bows.) Red Oak.— ‘© A glorious tree is the old gray oak ; He has stood for a thousand years— Has stood and frowned, On the trees around Like a king among his peers ; As round their king they stand, so now, When the flowers their pale leaves fold, The tall trees around him stand, arrayed In their robes of purple and gold. ** He has stood like a tower, And dared the winds to battle. He has heard the hail, And from plates of mail From his own limbs, shaken, rattle; He has tossed them about, and shorn the tops, When the storm has roused his might, Of the forest trees, as a strong man doth The heads of his foes in fight.” Scarlet Oak (Otto).—That poem which Red Oak quoted reminded me of an old say- ing of Dr. Holmes. He says: “I wonder if you ever thought of a single mark of supremacy which distinguishes this tree from those around it? The others shirk the work of resisting gravity, the Oak defies it. It chooses the horizontal direction for its limbs so that their whole weight may tell, and then stretches them out 50 or 60 feet so that the strain may be mighty enough to be worth resisting. You will find that in passing from the extreme downward droop of the branches of the Weeping Willow to the extreme upward inclination of those of the Poplar, they sweep nearly half a circle. At 90 degrees the Oak stops short, to slant upward another degree would mark infirmity of purpose, to bend downward weakness of organization.” Black Oak (Ruby).— What the Oak said sounds scientific. I want to tell you some- thing that begins with “‘once upon a time.” Once upon a time the devil agreed with a man that he should have the latter’s soul at the time when the oak leaves fell ; but when he came to look at the oak in the autumn he found it still in leaf, nor did it part with its old leaves till the new ones began to sprout. In his rage and disappointment he scratched the leaves so vehemently that they have been in consequence jagged ever since. White Oak.—These are certainly good words for the Oak family. We will next. listen to some music from the little birds—our very dear friends. White Oak.—We shall next hear from the Maples, of which there are six in our State. They are cousins to the Buckeye, Bladdernut, and Box-elder, all of which belong to the Maple family. Sugar Maple (Louise).—I am a favorite ornamental tree. Poets of all ages have sung about the oak. Iam no Sweet Singer of Michigan, but I am possessed of sweetness. I claim to have made more boys and girls happy than any other tree. I have many changes in dress—wearing in sprigg the softest shade of every color; in the summer the purest emerald, and in the autumn the most brilliant yellow. My wood is used for furniture, floors, and for furnishing the interior of houses, and after the houses are finished few can warm them better than I. Red Maple (Mary).—I am often called Soft Maple, a name also applied to one of my sisters. I beautify the country in spring with early red blossoms, and in autumn my leaves are streaked with scarlet. Silver Maple (Jennie).—My sister Red Maple and myself are both called Soft Maple. I make a very rapid growth and am found by the side of streams. I am often planted as a shade tree, and in the far West many are planted for shelter belts and for timber. Bass Wood (Maud).—I am a fine shade tree, my home a moist rich soil. My fragrant flowers furnish a great amount of excellent honey for the bees at a time when most other flowers have disappeared. My timber is soft, light and tough, and not apt to split, good for cabinet work, boxes, broom handles, ete. 159 Black Cherry (Ethel).— With our beautiful blossoms we need not be envious of the orange groves of California. J am one large snowball of blossoms in the spring. My fruit is much liked by the birds, and my wood is fine, light, durable and looks much like mahogany. My cousins are the wild plum, crab-apple, mountain ash, hawthorn, June- berry, spirzea, the apple, pear, quince, and the peach, and we all belong to the Rose family. Black Walnut (Frank).—I am not ornamental, nor am I a good neighbor, for I sometimes poison other trees that live near me. In spite of my bad qualities I am liked because I can be converted into cash at any moment. Some of my brothers have sold as high as $2,000. Those who care for us care for a fortune. My relative, the Butter- nut, is much loved by boys and girls. It was round my brother at Haverstraw, on the Hudson, that Gen. Wayne mustered his forces at midnight, preparatory to his attack on Stony Point. Hickory (Ray).—There are four brothers of us in Michigan, but I am the least worthy of them all, and am the only one present at this convention. We are cousins of the Walnut and Butternut and all belong to the Walnut family. If you want a wood that is good for buggies, axe handles, barrel hoops, a wood like iron, call upon my brother, the Shag-bark. You will have all the nuts you want thrown into the bargain. Once upon a time there was a president of the country who had so many of my qualities that they called him Old Hickory. White Oak.—We will sing about the ‘‘ echo which in the forest dwells.” White Oak.—We will next hear a few words from the Ashes. (Three rise and stand till all are through.) White Ash (Myrtie).—I am a tall tree and have often been complimented for my usefulness. I have been told that I havea graceful top and beautiful pinnate leaves. My wood is heavy, hard, strong, coarse-grained, compact, and of a brown color, and is much used for cabinet ware, farm implements, and house finishing. I thrive on rich, moist soil, Blue Ash (Amy).—I am not often found in Michigan. I grow slowly and attain a good size. My wood is valuable for lumber, posts and sills. I may be distinguished from al] other Ashes by the square branches of a year’s growth. Black Ash (Ella).—I thrive in swamps and along streams, and become a large,. useful tree. My wood is used for furniture, barrel hoops and baskets. When well cared for I become one of the finest ornamental trees. For this purpose I have never been fully appreciated. The Ashes belong to the Olive family. We have been called musical, as in this quotation : ** Ye Ashes wild resounding o’er the steep, Delicious is your music to the soul.” White Oak.—Who will speak next? (A number rise.) Birch has the floor. Birch (William).—I am a useful factor in the cause of education, though not now so commonly found in the school room as in former years. There are five sisters of us Birches in Michigan. The Alders are our cousins. Probably you are best acquainted with the Canoe Birch, whose white wood you see in spools and shoe pegs. It gives up its beautiful white dress without anyinjury to itself. Longfellow has made us a cele- brated family in Hiawatha. He says of us: ** Give me your bark, O, Birch tree! Of your yellow bark, 0, Birch tree ! Growing by the rushing river, Tall and stately in the valley ! I a light canoe will build me, That shall float upon the river, Like a yellow leaf in antumn, Like a yellow water lily ! Lay aside your cloak, O, Birch tree ! Lay aside your white skin wrapper, For the summer time is coming, And the sun is warm in heaven, And you need no white skin wrapper.” 160 White Oak.—Let us hear from the Elms. American Elm (Lida).—I have been called the Queen of the Forest, and stand with- out a rival at the head of the list of ornamental deciduous leaved trees. I claim this rank on account of hardiness, rapid growth, and the graceful and majestic beauty of my drooping branches. We are very proud of our Massachusetts relative under whose venerable shade Washington first took command of the Continental army, July 3, 1775. How the affection of every lover of his country clings around that tree! What care has been taken of it, what marks of esteem have been shown it by the citizens of Cam- bridge, may be judged by those who have seen it standing, as it does, in the centre of a great public thoroughfare, its trunk protected by an iron fence from injury by passing vehicles, which for more that a century have turned out in deference to this monarch of the Revolution. Red Elm (Claude).—I am well known for my durable red wood and mucilaginous bark and am often called “Slippery Elm.” My sister, Rock Elm, is a fine tree with corky branches, and the wood is valuable for farm implements. Hackberry (Otis).—I am one of the poor cousins of the Elms, and am little known. I am sometimes called the Nettle tree, and I am afraid Michigan people are not on speaking terms with me. Allow me to tell you about my German relative, the Luther Elm, near Worms. It is said to have been planted as follows: A bigoted old Catholic lady, thrusting a stick in the ground, declared her resolution not to accept the new faith _ till that dry stick became green. The fact that it did so proved the interest taken by trees in the preservation of orthodoxy. Red Mulberry (Robert).—I am another obscure cousin of the Elms and not often seen in Michigan. The birds are fond of my berries and the wood 1s as valuable as cedar for posts. Let me praise the Elm. ** Hail to the Elm! the brave old Elm! Our last lone forest tree, Whose limbs outstand the lightning’s brand; For a brave old Elm is he! For fifteen score of full-told years, He has borne his leafy prime, Yet he holds them well, and lives to tell His tale of the olden time !” White Oak.—Let us all repeat the lines of N. S. Dodge in praise of the Queen of the Forest. ** Then hail to the elm! the green-topp’d elm ! And long may his branches waye, For a relic is he, the gnarl’d old tree, Of the times of the good and brave.” White Oak.—We will have another song about the birds (or any other subject). White Oak.—We have heard nothing from the Willows. Willow (Marion).—I live near the water and my wood is made into the strangest things, artificial limbs, tooth-picks, ball clubs and -zyunpowder. Some of us are called «Pussy Willows.” Elizabeth Allen has written this lovely poem to my sister, the Weeping Willow of Europe, who has been for years mourning something to us unknown, ** O, Willow, why forever weep, As one who rourns an endless wrong ! What hidden woe can lie so deep? What utter grief can last so long? Mourn on forever, unconsoled, And keep your secret, faithful tree ! No heart in all the world can hold A sweeter grace than constancy.” 161 _ The Poplar (Cara).—There are five sisters of us Poplars who live in Michigan. One is called Cotton Wood, and two are called Aspens. We are cousins of the Willows and all belong to the Willow family. I will read some lines of the poets: *“ Why tremble so, broad Aspen-tree ? Why shake thy leaves ne’er ceasing ? At rest thou never seem’st to be, For when the air is still and clear, Or when the nipping gale, increasing, Shakes from thy boughs soft twilight’s tear, Thou tremblest still, broad Aspen-tree, And never tranquil seem’st to be.” White Oak.—We ought to hear from Red Bud and Sassafras and Pepperidge and Buttonwood or Sycamore, who live in our forests, but they do not appear to be present at this convention. Our exercises would not be complete without hearing from the members of the Pine family or cone bearing trees. White Pine (Sylvia).—I am one of the tallest and largest, most common, well known and valuable trees of the State. In Europe, where some of my number have been introduced, they often call me Weymouth Pine. My leaves are long, light green and in clusters of five. As a long-lived and beautiful tree for ornamenting rural grounds and parks, I take a high rank, while an immense amount of valuable lumber is cut from my wood. White Oak.—Let us hear from another Pine of Michigan. Red Pine (Naoma).—I am often called Norway Pine, though I do not know why. I never lived in Norway, but am only found in North America. I am a tall, straight tree, with long evergreen leaves in clusters of two. I grow slowly, making valuable timber, whiclwis much harder than that of White Pine. For ornamental purposes I much resemble Austrian Pine, though much superior to that tree, if we rely on the opinions of noted horticulturists. White Oak.—The White Pine and Red Pine have a sister Pine in Michigan. We shall now give her an opportunity to speak. Grey Pine (Rose).—I am a tree of small size, found on poor land in Northern Michigan. When young my growth is rapid; my leaves grow in pairs and are quite short. My wood abounds in pitch. I am known by a variety of names, as Scrub Pine, Jack Pine, Buckwheat Pine, Black Pine, Crocodile Pine, but the name I like the best is Pinus Banksiana. I want to tell you what Ruskin says : “ The tremendous unity of the pine absorbs and molds the life of a race. The pine shadows rest upon a nation. The Northern people, century after century, lived under one or other of the two great powers of the pine and the sea, both infinite. They dwelt amidst the forests or they wandered on the waves, and saw no end or any other horizon. Still the dark green trees, or the dark green waters jagged the dawn with their fringe of their foam, and whatever elements of imagination or of warrior strength or of domestic justice were brought down by the - Norwegian or the Goth against the dissoluteness or degradation of the south of Europe, _ were taught them under the green roofs and wild penetralia of the pine.” White Oak.—We have another cone-bearing tree in attendance. I call on Hemlock Spruce (Agnes).—I have been called by students in art and botany and horticulture ‘“‘ the most beautiful coniferous hardy tree yet known.” I grow to a good height and require a large size. My evergreen leaves have delicate tints, my young branches droop gracefully. Asa timber tree I do not claim the highest honor. My bark is valuable for tanning leather. White Oak.—There are two other sister evergreens called ‘‘Spruces” I see-in the audience. Black Spruce (Rhoda).—I abound in swamps in Northern Michigan. I am often used for Christmas trees on festive occasions, and boys and girls search me over for a supply of first-class gum. I am not responsible, though, for all the gum that goes by my name. Within a few years my wood has been largely used to make white paper. 11 (F.G.) 162 White Oak.—I recognize another evergreen. I call on Red Cedar (Clara).—In summer my leaves are beautiful, but in winter they become brown. I am found only sparingly in any part of the world, though I am the most widely distributed of any tree in the United States. I grow slowly and produce a beautiful red, fragrant wood, which is soft and very durable. My wood is now mainly limited to the making of lead pencils. White Oak.—Let us next hear from Balsam Fir (Alice).-—I am a rather small, slender evergreen found in swamps, though often cultivated as an ornament about dwellings, I arrive at my prime when about four- teen years old. White Oak.—I shall now call on Arbor Vitz (Maud).—I thrive in the swamps of the North and afford shelter to wild animals. I am often called white cedar and I furnish most of the telegraph poles, some fence posts, railway ties and blocks for paving streets. I take a high place as an ornamental tree. White Oak.—We have now heard from all of the cone-bearing evergreen trees who are present. There is another tree of the State, not here present, which is cone-bearing, and belongs to the Pine family. © I refer to the tamarack. There are some other matters appropriate to Arbor Day which should demand our attention at this time. How do the trees of Michigan compare in beauty and variety with those of Great Britain of which we read so much ? Susie.—The farther north we go the fewer kinds of trees we find ; the farther south, the greater the variety. Great Britain and Ireland contain more than twice the area of Michigan. The have one basswood, not so good as ours; one very small maple, one cherry, one small ash, two elms, two poplars, one beech, one small birch, one pine, one oak much like our white oak. Great Britain has about ten species of wees native to her soil, while Michigan, with half the territory, has about ninty species, or nine times as great a variety. White Oak.—For some interesting points in reference to nuts and seeds I call on Red Maple.— Last autumn the hazels, beeches, chestnuts, oaks, hickories, walnuts and buckeyes, matured their fruit, and with this maturing the burs, or cups, or husks, opened or the stems snapped in two at a joint which began to form months before. If a bur or nut held fast too tenaciously, the frost made it willing to drop, and down it went with hundreds of others, among the leaves. The leaves, with the help of the shifting winds, gently covered the fruit—or some portions of it. The leaves make the best kind of protection from dry air and severe cold, and they come just at the right time. All the seeds are not covercd, but Dame Nature is generous. She produces an abundance ; enough for seed and enough to feed the birds, squirrels, and other animals. White Oak.— We want to hear a word about Nature’s tree-planters, the squirrels, birds and other animals. Basswood.—The squirrels eat many nuts, but carry a portion to some distance in every direction, where they plant one or two ina place. It may be the thought of the squirrel to return at some future time of need, but his bump of locality is not well de- veloped or he has laid up more than he needed. At all events some of the nuts are allowed to remain where he planted them, In this way he is a benefit to the trees, and pays for the nuts which he eats, He has not lived in vain, for he is a tree-planter and believes in arboriculture. His arbor days come in autumn, and he needs no gubernatorial message to stimulate him to work. White Oak.—This subject will be continued by White Spruce (Adeline).—Many of our trees and shrubs produce a fleshy fruit or berry. Among them are the mountain ash. service berry, wild crab apple, hawthorn, cherry, holly, viburnnm, pepperidge, hackberry, mulberry, sassafras, wild plum, persimmon, paw paw, cedars and junipers. Many of these when ripe are rendered conspicuous by brilliant colors. The fruits are eagerley sought by grouse, turkeys, deer, bear, or other ee A ee, eee lt 163 animals. In most cases the seeds of such fruits are protected by a very firm covering and are not digestible. They are sown broadcast by wild animals under circumstances most favorable for germination. The birds, too, belong to the society of tree-planters, White Oak.—We will next listen to some accounts of the wind as a sower of seeds. Sassafras (Iona).—Some trees produce dry seeds or seed-pods, and usually drop only a portion in autumn. They hold on to some seeds with considerable tenacity. Among these are the buttonwood, basswood, ironwoed, blue beech, box-elder, hop tree, tulip tree, the ashes, catalpa, locust, Judas tree, birches, alders, larches, pines, spruces. The fruit or the seed is thin, or provided with wings, which distribute them as they fall, or after they have fallen. In winter it needs but a slight packing of the snow to bear up the seeds. At such times, some of the seeds are torn from the trees by the wind, and may be seen sliding along like miniature ice boats, often half a mile or more from the nearest tree. The wind also aids in transporting the seeds of our elms, maples, willows and poplars. White Oak.—Next listen to something more about seeds, Red Bud (Cynthia),—A seed is a young plant and is packed ready for transporta- tion. It has a tiny stem, some seed leaves and a terminal bud. The mother tree, before casting off her progeny into the world, did not fail to give it a little outfit in the form of starch for food stored up in or surrounding the thick seed leaves. As the young chicks while in the shell are nourished by the yolk of the egg, so the young oak or maple sub- sists on the starch stored up before ripening. White Oak.—When do our trees make their growth and how do they get ready for the next year ! Box Elder (Nina).—Most of our trees put forth their new growth during a few weeks in spring or early summer. Do you wonder what they are doing during the rest of the warm weather? They are by no means idle. They may be perfecting flowers and seeds, but all of them are getting ready for the next winter and spring. Through the influence of light and heat, the green leaves are forming starch which is transported and stored in the pith, young wood and bark. The young leaves and stems are started and arranged, packed in cotton, covered by scales and in some cases the scales are protected by pitch or varnish. White Oak.—Next in order will be a few ade in regard to the tree as a com- munity. Buckeye (Douglass).—A tree is a composite being, a kind of community by itself. The leaves and limbs are all the time striving with each other to see which shall have the most room and the most sunshine. Each strives for all it can get. While some perish in the attempt, or meet with only very indifferent success, the strongest of the strongest buds survive. Each leaf helps to sustain the limb which carries it, and each limb furnishes some nourishment to the common trunk for the common welfare. The tax is always adjusted according to the ability of each to contribute. As the limbs of a tree are striving for the mastery, so each bush and tree in grove or forest is striving with others for the mastery. The weakest succumb to the strongest ; some perish early, some lead a feeble existence for many years, while even the strongest are more or less injured. With plenty of room, the trunk will be short, the branches many and widespread ; where crowded, the lower limbs perish for want of light. Dead limbs fall to the ground to protect and enrich it for nourishing the surviving limbs and the trunk. The scars heal over, more limbs perish as new ones creep upward, and thus we find tall, clean trunks in a dense forest. White Oak.—To be successful, it is very important to know how to gather and care for seeds and nuts. Yellow Wood (Robert),—Gather the seeds or nuts of trees when ripe and, if con- venient, plant them where the trees are expected to remain. In this list we include especially the trees which have long tap roots, and do not easily transplant, such as the tulip tree, the hickories, the oaks, the walnuts, and chestnuts. The seeds of elms and maples are not easily kept over winter. Seeds of evergreens, the larch, and the locusts may be dried and kept as grain is kept. Many seeds and nuts may be mixed with an equal bulk of sand as it is dug from a knoll, and buried a few inches or a foot below the 164 one ee Te surface. Tn spring they may be carried to the garden and planted. Soak seeds of locust and honey locust in hot water till the outer covering softens, and then plant. Soak seeds of evergreens three or four days in water, changed daily, and then plant very shallow in rows a few inches apart in rich loam, well screened by lath, brush or muslin. See that weeds do not rob the young plants of light, room and nourishment. Evergreens in small quantity, when small.and two or three years old, can be purchased of experts more cheaply than they can be raised at home. These can be set in rows and cultivated for a few years like Indian corn. For further details you are advised to read copies of our State horticultural reports, take lessons of a nurseryman, or go to the Agricultural College. White Oak.—It is of little use to plant seeds or buy trees, unless we know how to handle them while moving. Kentucky Coffee Tree (Hiram).—In taking up a tree, whether large or small, do not twist it about so as to break or bend the roots abruptly. Get aJl the roots you can afford to, remembering that a tree will not grow without roots. When out of the ground keep the roots constantly covered with soil, moss, damp straw or something else. The roots are far more sensitive to dry air than are the parts above ground. No one need wonder that trees carted into town with short roots exposed to dry air often fail to grow or lead a precarious life for years. Study the structure and the physiology of a tree and treat it as one who always makes everything thrive which he cares for. White Oak.— How shall we care for the trees after planting ? Apple Tree (Hannah).—To set a tree so as to ensure its thrifty growth, place it but little deeper than it was while growing. Have the soil well pulverized and pack it closely about the tree. After all this trouble, do not court disappointment in the slow growth or in the death of a favorite tree, but dig or rake the ground every week or two all summer for three to five years for a distance of four feet or more each way from the tree. If this is impracti- cable, place a mulch of something covering the space above mentioned. White Oak.—After planting, trees sometimes become too thick. What shall wedo? Pear Tree (Audrew),—A tree, like a child, is a living, organized being and keeps changing as long as life lasts. It is not best merely to set as many trees as we expect to remain for a life time, but plant them more thickly with a view to removal. Here is where 99 out of 100 fail. They do not keep an eye on the growth and trim or remove trees until they ‘have crowded and damaged each other beyond recovery. In most instances, a few large, well developed trees should grow where many small ones were planted years before. It needs courage and judgment to remove some favorite trees that others may continue to spread and make a symmetrical growth. White Oak.—Next will follow something in reference to the flowers of trees. Bitternut (Silas).—With rare exceptions, our trees bear flowers which are incon- spicuous. The elms and the maples produce flowers in spring before the leaves appear. Most have the staminate and pistillate flowers on different parts of the tree or on different trees. The wind or gravity carries the pollen to the pistil, so there is no need of sweet odors or a gay display of flowers to attract bees and butterflies and moths to carry the pollen. Compensation is well displayed in nature. If the tree has not gorgeous or fragrant flowers, it has a large size and often a beautiful form. White Oak.—We should learn to love tress and to associate them with the generous hand who planted and cared for them. Wild Plum (Ezra).—TI will tell you something which was written by Washington Irving: ‘‘ There is something noble, simple and pure in a taste for trees. It argues, I think, a sweet and generous nature to have this strong relish for the beauties of vegeta- tion, and this friendship for the hardy and glorious sons of the forest. There is a grandeur of thought connected with this part of rural economy. It is worthy of liberal, and free- born, and aspiring men. He who plants an oak looks forward to future ages, and plants for posterity. Nothing can be less selfish than this. He cannot expect to sit in its shade nor enjoy its shelter ; but he exults in the idea that the acorn which he has buried in the earth shall grow up into a lofty pile, and shall keep on flourishing and increasing and benefiting mankind long after he shall have ceased to tread his paternal fields.” 165 White Oak.—We will hear what O. W. Holmes says on this subject. Tamarack (Elias).—Dr. O. W. Holmes says: “1 have written many verses, but the best poems I have produced are the trees I planted on the hillside which overlooks the broad meadows, scalloped and rounded at their edges by loops of the sinuous Housatonic. Nature finds rhymes for them in the recurring measures of the seasons. Winter strips them of their ornaments and gives them, as it were, in prose translation, and summer reclothes them in all the splendid phrases of their leafy language. “ What are these maples and beeches and birches but odes and idyls and madrigals ? What are these pines and firs and spruces but holy rhymes, too solemn for the many-hued raiment of their gay deciduous neighbors ? “ As you drop the seed, as you plant the sapling, your left hand hardly knows what your right hand is doing. But Nature knows, and in due time the power that sees and - works in secret will reward you openly.” White Oak.—This concludes what we had on the programme for this convention. Hemlock.—I move we have some more music and then adjourn. White Oak.—If there be no objections we shall have the music. White Oak.—This convention stands adjourned until again convened by the proper authorities, II.—_STATUTORY PROVISIONS. It is provided by the Agriculture and Arts Act, 49 Victoria, chap. 11 (1886), that the Fruit Growers’ Association should be a body corporate, comprising not less than fifty members, each paying an annual subscription fee of not less than $1 ; that it shall hold an annual meeting at such time and place as may be determined upon ; that the retiring officers shall at such meeting present a full report of their proceedings, and of the proceedings of the Association, and a detailed statement of its receipts and expenditure for the previous year, duly audited by the Auditors ; that the Association shall at such meeting elect a President, a Vice-President, and one Director from each of the Agricultural Divisions of the Province (mentioned in Schedule A following), and the officers and Directors so elected shall appoint from among themselves, or otherwise, a Secretary and a Treasurer, or.a Secretary-Treasurer ; and that the Association shall also elect two Auditors. Vacancies occurring through death, resignation, or otherwise-in the directorate of the Fruit Growers’ Association, shall be filled by the Board of Directors. The officers shall have full power to act for and on behalf of the Association, and all grants of money and other funds of the Association shall be received and expended under their direction, subject nevertheless to the by-laws and regulations of the Association. A copy of the Annual Report of its proceedings, a statement of receipts and expenditure, a list of the officers elected, and also such general information on matters of special interest as the Association have been able to obtain, shall be sent to the Commissioner of Agriculture within forty days after the holding of such annual meeting, III. —ScHepuLteE A,—AGRICULTURAL DIVISIONS. 1. Stormont, Dundas, Glengarry, Prescott and Cornwall. a 2. Lanark North, Lanark South, Renfrew North, Renfrew South, Carleton, Russell and the City of Ottawa. 3. Frontenac, City of Kingston, Teeds and Grenville North, Leeds South, Grenville South and Brockville. 4. Hastings East, Hastings North, Hastings West, Addington, Lennox and Prince Edward. 5. Durham East, Durham West, Northumberland East, Northumberland West, Peterborough East, Peterborough West, Victoria North (ineluding Haliburton), and Victoria South. = 6. York East, York North, York West, Ontario North, Ontario South, Peel, Cardwell and City of oronto. 7. Wellington Centre, Wellington South, Wellington West, Waterloo North, Waterloo South, Wentworth North, Wentworth South, Dufferin, Halton and City of Hamilton, 8. Lincoln, Niagara, Welland, Haldimand and Monck. 9. Elgin East, Elgin West, Brant North, Brant South, Oxford North, Oxford South, Norfolk North and Norfolk South. 10. Huron East, Huron South, Huron West, Bruce Centre, Bruce North, Bruce South, Grey East, Grey North and Grey South, 166 11. Perth North, Perth South, Middlesex East, Middlesex North, Middlesex West and City of London. 12. Essex North, Essex South, Kent East, Kent West, Lambton East and Lambton West. 13, Algoma East, Algoma West, Simcoe East, Simcoe South, Simcoe West, Muskoka and Parry Sound, ; IV.—CONSTITUTION OF THE ASSOCIATION. Art. I.—This Association shall be called ‘‘ The Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario.” Art. II.—Its objects shall be the advancement of the science and art of fruit culture by holding meetings for the Exhibition of fruit and for the discussion of all qusetions relative to fruit culture, by collecting, arranging and disseminating useful information, and by such other means as may from time to time seem advisable. Art. III.— The annual meeting of the Association shall be held at such time and pla¢e as shall be designated by the Association. Art. IV.—The officers of the Association shall be composed of a President, Vice-President, a Secretary, or Secretary-Treasurer, and thirteen Directors. Art. V.—Any person may become a member by an annual payment of one dollar, and a payment of ten dollars shall constitute a member for life. Art. VI.—This Constitution may be amended by a vote of a majority of the members present at any regular meeting, notice of the proposed amendments having been given at the previous meeting. Art. WII.—The said Officers and Directors shall prepare and present to the annual meeting of the Association a report of their proceedings during the year, in which shall be stated the names of all the members of the Associaticn, the places of meeting during the vear, and such information as the Association shall have been able to obtain on thé subject of fruit culture in the Province during the year. There shall also be presented at the said annual meeting a detailed statement of the receipts and disbursements of the Associetion during the year, which report and statement shall be entered in the journal and signed by the President as being a correct copy; and a true copy thereof, certified by the Secretary for the time being, shall be sent to the Commissioner of Agriculture within forty days after the holding of such annual meeting. Art. VIII.—The Association shall have power to make, alter and amend By-laws for prescribing the mode of admission of new members, the election of officers, and otherwise regulating the administration of its affairs and propery. V.—BY-LAWS. 1. The President, Vice-President and Secretary-Treasurer shall be ex-officio members of all committees. 2. The directors may offer premiums to any person originating or introducing any new fruit adapted to the climate of the Province which shall possess such distinctive excellence as shall, in their opinion, render the same of special value ; also for essays upon such subjects connected with fruit-growing as they may designate, under such rules and regulations as they may prescribe. 3. The Secretary shall prepare an annual report containing the minutes of the proceedings of meetings during the year ; a detailed statement of receipts and expenditure ; the reports upon fruits received from different localities ; and all essays to which prizes have been awarded, and such other information in regard to fruit culture as may have been received during the year, and submit the same to the Directors or any Committee of Directors appointed for this purpose, and, with their sanction, after presenting the same at the annual meeting, cause the same to be printed by and through the Publication Committee, and send a copy thereof to each member of the Association and to the Commissioner of Agriculture. 4, Seven Directors shall constitute a quorum, and if at any meeting of Directors there shall not be a quorum, the members present may adjourn the meeting from time to time until a quorum shall be obiained. 5. The annual subscription shall be due in advance at the annual meeting. 6. The President (or in case of his disability, the Vice-President) may convene special meetings at such times and places as he may deem advisable, and he shall convene such special meetings as shall be requested in writing by five members. 7. The President may deliver an address on some subject relating to the objects of the Association. 8. The Treasurer shall receive all moneys belonging to the Association, keep a correct account thereof, and submit the same to the Directors at any legal meeting of such Directors, five days’ notice having been previously given for that purpose. 9. The Directors shall audit and pass all accounts, which, when approved of by the President’s signature, shall be submitted to and paid by the Treasurer. 10, It shall be the duty of the Secretary to keep a correct record of the proceedings of the Association, conduct the correspondence, give not less than ten days’ notice of all meetings to the members, and specify the business of special meetings. 167 11. The Directors, touching the conduct of the Association, shall at all times have absolute power - and control of the funds and property of the Association, subject however to the meaning and construction of the Constitution. 12. At special meetings no business shall be transacted except that stated in the Secretary’s circular. 13. The order of business shall be : (1) Reading of the minutes; (2) Reading of the Directors’ Report; (3) Reading of the Treasurer’s Report ; (4) Reading of prize essays ; (5) President’s Address ; (6) Election of officers, and (7) Miscellaneous business. 14. These By-laws may be amended at any general meeting by a vote of two-thirds of the members present. 15, Each member of the Fruit Committee shall be charged with the duty of accumlating information touching the state of the fruit crop, .the introduction of new varieties, the market value of fruits in his particular section of the country, together with such other general and useful information touching fruit interests as may be desirable, and report in writing to the Secretary of the Association on or before the fifteenth day of September in each year. The President, Vice-President and Secretary shall be ex-officio members of the Board of Directors and of all Committees. _The reasonable and necessary expenses of Directors and officers in attending meetings of the Board of Directors and of Committees shall be provided from the funds of the Association. oe a 4 ‘ - ay TM RD a a Point A) 8 rp ; rads ‘ wieBtien ee Agemtelei 6)E : d cn 5) > yee isk BEV OR at ieee 4 d aed ‘perm ~ = {tent Sha >= Coe ce as ies : a a he ie af Lo yt J a3 e 2 ee ory — NINETEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF 4 %, \ ONTARIO, 1888. Printed by Order of the Legislative Assembly, FORONTO': PRINTED BY WARWICK AND SONS, 68 AND 70 FRONT STREET WEST. 1889. TA EM ves Pe) ae E < * ° 4 Wf mS rs L » 4 ‘vy ANY RY Ned A Saas PAT AC M459 fe Muy Has ah oe as Lae ae Beads . rs - ’ . A’ ra e ae ae 9 ; : a es ete . ts . ey ean / 1 ae . . ’ ; wok Be a * ; con Ae, Fe TABLE OF CONTENTS. A Pace. Abbot, John, the Aurelian. ...... 48, 50, 55 MUMS SURI sh ly os hay => vy KIS eS A 54 PeAOONTANN: . 05... 4 adhe «>. 8 fo Gt eh oo 9, 10 DEMIS MERIIREOTIS c= ow = aie pci ated)- = 8 oo Cr 40 maven MacCnilochii...............-. 58, 80 memmplyacirtes vVialis................. 88* American Association for the Advance- Mens GI PCIONCS . 20.22.5205. Sf. 38 Awmpelophaga myron ............... 24 " Romer Sess as 24 Annual Address of the President .... 3 ‘¢ Meeting of Entomological So- Pg 2 yr 2 Annual Meeting of Montreal Branch . 17 oe benort of Council........... 14 5 “¢ Evbrarian’ >=... .. 15 ** Statement of Secretary-Treas- ETD AE Se ee 15 AE ee ee 4, 6, 66 CRED fone oo Sea eee, « 9 B Bethune, Rev. C. J. S, Articles by.. 38, 41, 42, 63 MPMRMNMIELCON IS 292.2 tates. 582 LG ios oc 41 Butterflies and Moths, Chapter on Seeetiro Of -.......05.052.257 51 Butterflies at Nepigon......... 2, 40, 74, 83 es at-Fort Arthur.......<. 2, 39, 40 me 2 on ere ae 74, 81 ce of Eastern United States and Canada; Scudder.......... 12, 46 Butterflies of Ceylon; Moore........ 45 : pate? MET yer so. os... 43 5 North America; Edwards 43 - South Africa; Trimen.. 44 ‘* rearing from the egg ..... 40, 74 Cc Pace. Calasymbolus cerisii................ 28 + geminata. . Se. es 28, 61 ms REV OD. «Biss > soles eee 27 Canadian Entomologist . ..... ..... 17 Captures, Remarkable, in Ontario... 2, 18 Carterocephalus mandan ......... 80, 82, 85 Cecidomyia grossularie ............. 64 Ceratomia amyntor................- 28 Cima alti. .215 5... 2. tat 5 oe ae 2, 40 is Bivens... oer 40, 77, 85 Clisiocampa Americana ............. 71 ty oid Ig i, a ae 71 ROHS CEIBNMIES © tite.) 3 er ee dees 2, 82 puryineme: ste fy". 2, 40, 74, 79 FN ECL Y 110) emits Rat Se 2, 40, 76, 80, 84 Collecting Butterflies. ............. 74, 81 Coretis (sintis 7) cree ot ec oe 70 Wawa Dirihe. arene ee! aces. «es Ree 21 Cressonia juglandis................. 28 Cab-WOEIR engin, Jus hci mae 7 D Dakruma convolutella .............. 63 Deilephila Chameenerii ... ........ 24 mg MA a 8B cp ansys Ses Spire 24 ULES TS ta tc gees ea ee ee 88 Drury, Hon. C., Address by ........ 13 E leche OF OMCEtS 5 iiss a9 ak widioiwd='s ps 13 Entomology for Beginners; Packard. 11, 41 £6 Introduction to; Com- BEOGKyo dies, sult) SAM SE 42 Erythroneura vitis ......4.0530 9/ua8 64 Eucheetes egle larve.............-.. 20 F Fletcher, J., Annual Address of Presi- 1 | SO eae PERL AD eS Reta 3 Fletcher, J., Articles by ......... 46, 74, 88 Fyles, Rev. T. W., Articles by... .19, 23, 37 G PaGE. Gas-lime for onion maggot .......... 69 Gooseberry fruit-worm.............. 63 - FAITE: 6 oes crate Ree 64 eee es Tha. ic0ea's a hore shee eee 37 Grape-vine leaf-hopper ............. 64 ROB EPPOTS 22.6042. se = sss we Sete 10 Grote, A. B.; Article by ....<5 2.6 51 H Madena devastatrix... 3 :'o- 4). 25 25's 9 Harris, Dr. T. W,, Works on Insects. 58 iawk-=moths). dsicc-cie one Aon eee 34 ts Caterpillars ....... = 30 RP CONIAR Ay 1a! eo, tla ni, sich site eae 90 Holland, W. J., Article by.......... 43 PISA MIG: 25 oo ose aon Kea ee oa 66 Hubner, Jacob, Works on Insects . .. 57 Hypzenidz of Quebec .............. 19 I Febnenmon fies’ =. .me)- eee 87 i (1) sp... -in. 2 85 Paonias excsecatus......2.=.. see 28 Papilio turnus .... .-..<-2 =e 79, 82 Paris Green, Use of .....: 2.22555 6, 60 Persian Insect Powder, Use of ...... 6, 65 Philampelus achemon .............. 26 sj pandorus. ..../f) eee 26 Phorbia ceparum ...:..:....00.emee 69 Phorodon. humuli. ......: .. . A023 66 Platysamia Cecropia............... 54 Pyrameis cardui .....:..5. 2:0eeeee 84 s huntera .2...1..7.ee sae 34 R Red Maggot of wheat .............. 89 Remedies for Noxious Insects ...... 63 Report of Council. :...-::.2oneeeeene 14 ‘¢ Delegate to Royal Society. . 16 z Librarign:. .... «.\c.eeeeeee 15 ‘¢ Montreal Branch.......:.. 18 Riley, Dr. C. V ... .2 >... .ceeeee 9, 38, 66 =) Saunders, W. E., Article by ........ 21 Scudder, S. H., Articles by ...... 44, 45, 48 Silver-top-in hay ......‘...:5 5c 11, 14 Sparrow, The English............ 12, 21, 59 Sphingidse of Quebec ........ ames 23 Sphinx drupiferarum ..........:.<5 29 ‘* Kalmin. . 5). ...2-i¢pee 56 di Tent.caterpillars -2..... < sess 71 "PRTIDS 5.5 2. 0 a5 8 one asia > orn 11, 64 Thyreus Abhotii (4... .:). oie 24 Triptogon Modesta ...... ....cmeeue 21 Types of Insects .......:).4¢0 eee 39 U Utethoisa bella .. . 22,2 sie eee 5 ane 41 V Vapourer Moth .,;..::'t:: << «4500 50 WwW Wheat midge 0.0550 C0. gas coe 88 ss 6gtem maggot .. .....0 sae 90 White grubs .........2. 00 ocean 40 NINETEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO. To the Honourable the Minister of Agriculiure - Srr,—I have the honour to submit for your approval the annual report of the Entomological Society of Ontario for 1888. Included in the report is the financial statement of the Society, and the transactions of the annual meeting held in Ottawa, at which the Society had the pleasure of your presence, thereby evincing an interest in matters Entomological which was much appre- ciated by the members of the Society, and which will, itis hoped, be a means of encour- aging the work of Entomologists in our Province. Our monthly journal, the Canadian Entomologist, has been regularly issued during the year, and some measure of the value in which it is held by students of agriculture may be obtained by the fact that many of the Agricultural Experiment Stations in the United States have purchased from the Society complete sets of the magazine for refer- ence in the course of their work. During the year the Society’s collection of insects was returned from the Colonial Exhibition in London, England, and work is now in progress fitting it up as a perma- nent and representative collection for reference on the Entomology of Ontario. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, W. E. SAUNDERS, Secretary-Treasurer. 1 (EN.) ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY. The annual meeting of the Society was held in the City Hall, Ottawa, on Friday and Saturday, October 5th and 6th, 1888. A Council meeting was held on Friday morning at 10.30 o’clock, in a committee room of the City Hall, at which the following members were present :—The President, Mr. James Fletcher, Ottawa ; Mr. E. Baynes Reed, Mr. W. E. Saunders and Mr. J. M. Denton, London; Rev. CO. J. 8. Bethune, Port Hope ; Rey. T. W. Fyles, Quebec ; Mr. James Moffatt, Hamilton; Mr. H. H. Lyman, Mon- treal. After the transaction of routine business, the sum of $200 was voted to the Library Fund for the purchase of books and the binding of periodicals and pamphlets. An Executive Committee, to consist of the President, the Editor, the Secretary-Trea- surer and the members of the Council resident in London, was appointed to deal with all the financial affairs of the Society, and to provide for the representation of the Society at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The work of rearranging the Society’s collections and putting them in good order was directed to be continued, and Mr. Moffatt was requested to do for the Coleoptera what he has already so successfully accomplished with the Lepidoptera. In the afternoon the Society met at 2 o’clock. Mr. W. H. Harrington was present in addition to those above mentioned. Mr. Lyman exhibited a series of specimens of the different species of Callimorpha which he had described in his paper last year (C. Z. xix. p. 181) and remarked upon their various peculiarities. He thought it most desirable that names should be attached to the different varieties, even though they may hereafter be found to belong to the same species. Messrs. Fletcher, Fyles and Moffatt made remarks upon the subject, and agreed that all distinct forms should have separate names. Mr. Fletcher gave an account of his visit to Nepigon, Lake Superior, early in July, in company with Mr. 8. H. Scudder, of Cambridge, Mass., for the purpose of collecting the eggs of various rare species of butterflies. He described the various modes he employed in order to induce the females to deposit their eggs and recounted the great success he had achieved in securing the eggs of no less than nine species of butterflies and capturing a large number of others. Rey. Dr. Bethune exhibited a number of specimens of Colias ewrytheme, chiefly of the form eriphyle, which he had taken at Port Arthur on the Ist of September last, and gave an account of his trip to the Nepigon river, exhibiting a large number of specimens of butterflies and other insects captured there on August 21st, 22nd and 30th. Among these may be especially mentioned Colias interior and ewrytheme, Argynnis electa and bellona, Phyciodes tharos and nycteis, Grapta progne, Pyrameis huntera and cardui, Limenitis arthemis, ete. Rev. T. W. Fyles read a paper on Chionobas jutta, in which he recounted his suc- cess in rearing the insect through all its stages. Mr. Fletcher and Dr. Bethune spoke of the desirability of issuing a series of papers on “ Popular and Economic Entomology ” in the Canadian Entomologist, and urged upon the members present the necessity of co-operating in the work. The editor also drew the attention of the meeting to the duty of at once providing the material required for the Annual Report of the Society. The President laid on the table specimen sheets and plates of Mr. Scudder’s great work on the butterflies of the Eastern States and Canada, which were examined by the members with much interest. He also brought up for discussion the subject of the disease known as “silver-top” in hay, which is believed to be caused by a species of Thrips, and requested the members to investigate the matter in their various localities. The only remedy at present suggested is the plowing up of the old hayfields which are found to be the most seriously attacked. The depredations of grasshoppers during the past season were next considered. Mr. Fletcher suggested that much might be done to reduce their numbers by cutting the hay about the 20th June, if practicable, and thus prevent- ing the maturity of the insects by depriving them of their food before they were able to fly to a distance for it. Mr, Venton reported that the Chinch bug had been observed in the Township of Delaware, near London, and that it was likely to become very injurious if measures were not taken to counteract it. The meeting adjourned at 5.30 p.m. EVENING SESSION. In the evening the Society held a public meeting in the Council Chamber of the City Hall at 8 o’clock, at which there were about sixty persons present, including the Hon. C. Drury, the recently appointed Minister of Agriculture for Ontario; Mr. John Lowe, Deputy Minister of Agriculture for the Dominion of Canada; Professor Saunders, Director of the Experimental Farms of the Dominion; Sir James Grant, M.D.; Mr. R. B. Whyte, President of the Ottawa Field Naturalist’s Club; Mrs. Macleod Stewart, Mrs. Davidson and a number of farmers and gardeners from the city and neighbourhood. The proceedings of the evening began with an able and practical address from the President, Mr. James Fletcher, of Ottawa, upon “ Insects Injurious to Crops.” THE PRESIDENT’S ANNUAL ADDRESS. Lapizs AND GENTLEMEN,—It is with feelings of undisguised pleasure that the Council of the Entomological Society of Ontario.welcome you to this evening’s meeting. The time has been when such a gathering would have been impossible. The appreciation of the study of entomology as a practical branch of economic science, has only sprung up within the last few years, and this too in response to great and incessant’ efforts on the part of a few naturalists to make their work useful, by specially studying those species of insects which were found to attack products of economic value, with the set purpose of discovering remedies to lessen or prevent the loss thereby sustained. It is gratifying to know that foremost amongst these practical men of science have been many of our North American entomologists. The names of Harris, Fitch, Walsh, Glover and Riley in the United States, and in Canada Saunders and Bethune, are names never to be for- gotten in this connection for the work they have accomplished in the past, by patient, persistent labour, to distribute amongst cultivators intelligible knowledge which would enable them to meet and frustrate the attacks of their insect foes. It is a somewhat remarkable fact that until the last decade, comparatively few of the many students who have enjoyed the charms of the delightful study of entomology have turned their attention to this practical aspect of the case. In England, our dear mother-country, this want was even more marked, and until quite lately there were only two or three names which stood out prominently as having done conspicuous work in this line, such as Curtis, Kirby and Spence, and lastly, most important of all, our corresponding member, Miss Eleanor A. Ormerod, whose reports upon Injurious Insects and Methods of Prevention are now known the world over. Indeed, so great was the contempt in which these studies were at one time held that we are told by Kirby and Spence, in their classical treatise, that in the last century the will of a noble lady was actually set aside as that of an imbecile, upon the sole evidence that she had been known to collect and study insects. These ages of darkness and ignorance, however, have happily passed away, and to-day not only do the intelligent farmers, horticulturists and fruit-growers recognise the value of these studies, but every person of common sense appreciates the fact that by their means the revenue of every country may be largely increased, by giving methods of protecting all agricultural products from the large diminution attributable to the attacks of noxious insects. The Governments of many countries have recognised this, and employ their own State Entomologists, or appoint committees to carry on these investigations. In many American colleges they torm part of the curriculum of studies. Within the last year in Ontario I am delighted to tell you they have been added to the course of instruction at the Ontario Agricultural College at Guelph. It is but natural that. those engaged in the cultivation of the soil should put the proper value upon the work of economic entomologists, for they year after year see a large amount of their produce destroyed under their very eyes by the ravages of injurious insects, thus rendering much of their labour of no effect, and their incomes proportionately smaller ; they, too, have happily learnt by experience that much of this loss may be averted by following the advice of those specialists who devote their time to studying out the life-histories of their enemies. Until recentiy there was what I will call a foolish fashion amongst scientific men to scoff and sneer at the labours of those few who endeavoured to develope the economic phase of Entomology. They did not believe, it was alleged, “‘in wasting time over popularising science. If scientific study was to be valuable it must be technical ; there was not time to dish it up in a diluted and palatable form for the masses.” As a matter of fact, however, we find that those who are continuously engaged in the practical economic application of Entomology to the daily wants of mankind, have done just as’ good work scientifically as any others; and to-day we see that these ultra-scientists find it advisable to keep their opinions to themselves, and day by day we find more and more of the best scientific students throwing in their lot with those who only aim at making their investigations useful and for the public good. That the dangers arising from the increase in numbers of injurious insects are greater now than was formerly the case cannot, I think, be doubted. In all new countries larger and larger areas of land are continually being brought under cultivation, and by growing large quantities of any one crop the farmer furnishes those insects which feed upon it with a copious supply of food, and their numbers increase correspondingly. A large supply of proper food is the main cause which affects the amount of insect presence. The food of insects varies considerably, and embraces almost all organic substances. Those which come under our consideration now are mainly vegetable feeders. Of these some will feed upon a great many different kinds of plants, belonging to various families or natural orders ; others, and these, luckily for us, are by far the most numerous, will only eat a few, and these, too, must be plants of the same or an allied family. Others, again, are so particular that they will actually starve if they cannot obtain a certain species. In Nature we never find, as in our fields of grain or roots, any one plant filling a large space, to the total exclusion of all others ; but they are scattered here and there, several kinds growing together, consequently the insects which feed upon any particular one of them have to search far and wide for their food. This limited food supply is one of the checks which keeps their numbers down to the proper limit. It has been estimated that every plant has an average of seven or eight different insects which feed upon it. This number is probably too low, and some of course are known to have many more than this. Dr. A. S. Packard states, in a little work of which I shall speak later on, that the oak affords maintenance to between 500 and 600 species of insects, the hickory to 140, the birch 100, the maple 85, the poplar 72, and the pine over 100. It may be safely stated that at least one-tenth of all the plants grown as crops by farmers is annually destroyed by insects. The amount of loss — every year from this cause is so great, as shown by the instances where circumstances permit of an accurate computation being made, that it would: be inadvisable for me to dwell upon the subject or to give many of the figures, for | fear you would not believe me. I will, however, give a few instances which can be verified by those who wish to do so. In 1882 the lowest value which could be placed upon the agricultural produce de- stroyed by insects in the United States was $200,000,000. In Canada in one year the wheat midge destroyed 8,000,000 bushels of wheat, and in 1884 the “ clover-seed midge ” destroyed $650,000 worth of clover seed. In England in 1882 a single insect (the Hop Aphis), which belongs to one of the ten families which attack the hop, injured the crop to the extent of $13,000,000. Now, this enormous, and to a large measure unnecessary, waste can only be pre- vented by a systematic study of the life-histories of the insects which cause it. The habits or modes of life of insects are very various, and by no means always the same in the different stages. We have some species, as the Blister Beetles, which feed upon 7 5 ee animal food as grubs, and entirely upon vegetables in their perfect state. Again, some, as the large Silkworm Moths, are very voracious as caterpillars, but when they reach the perfect state have the mouth parts undeveloped, and take no food. By finding out their habits in all the different stages we are enabled to attack them at their most vulnerable points. The one great object of the Entomological Society of Ontario is to gather together all possible information concerning injurious insects, and, whenever anything is discovered which it is thought may be useful to keep them in check, to publish it abroad and make it known as widely as possible. Nobly assisted by the Provincial Government we have now carried on our investigations for over twenty years. Through the medium of our annual reports to the Minister, which he includes in his report of the Agriculture and Arts Department, and also by means of the Canadian. Entomologist, the monthly organ of the Society, a large amount of useful knowledge has been distri- buted amongst those most likely to benefit from it. I take pleasure in publicly making the announcement that the members of our Society wish it to be known that they hold whatever knowledge they have acquired entirely at the service of any one who may apply to them, and they will always be glad to answer questions and give advice concerning injurious and beneficial insects. Arrangements have been made during the present meeting to issue regularly in every number of the Canadian Entomologist, after 1st January next, at least one article upon economic or popular entomology. These will be prepared especially for those who are not entomologists, but who wish to learn some- thing about the science ; or for thosé who have not time nor perhaps inclination to take up entomology as a study, but who require simple and plainly-expressed information concerning the common pests which attack farm and garden crops. Notwithstanding the large amount of injury annually due to the attacks of insects, and the enormous hosts of these creatures, the actual number of different kinds which must be classed as “ first-class pests” is comparatively small. Of many of these the life-histories have already been worked out and remedies have been discovered, so that, with reference to most of the common crop insects, the farmer can now, for the trouble of asking for it, obtain advice which will enable him to stop or mitigate all the ordinary attacks to which his crops are liable. When a growing crop is observed to be attacked, the first thing to be done is to discover, if possible, the nature of the enemy. It is at this point that the value of knowing the life-histories of the common crop pests is made manifest, nay, is even indispensable, or much valuable time may be lost by the adoption of improper methods of prevention. It is sometimes possible te prevent serious loss by prompt action. This is particularly the case with those insects which are less active or more vulnerable during their preparatory stages than when they have reached their perfect form. A fact which is probably known to all of you present, but which cannot be too often repeated, is that the lives of all insects are divided up into four well marked periods or stages, during each of which their habits may be widely different. These stages are: 1. The egg, during which no injury can be done. 2. The caterpillar, during which stage, as a rule, the largest amount of the injury is perpetrated, as, indeed, the very name indicates. The word caterpillar means “ food- pillager,” a title, the application of which, I think, few will contest the propriety. (Fig. 1, a). 3. The chrysalis or pupa stage, in which, in most of the orders, the insect remains quiet and takes no food. (Fig. 1, 8). 4, The perfect insect. (Fig. 1, c). Some insects are injurious in all their stages after they leave the egg; but most of them only in the caterpillar form, or as caterpillar and perfect insect. Their habits, as I have said, vary greatly in the different orders, and there are, too, a great many orders, families, and species. Notwithstanding this, it will be found that the amount of know- ledge necessary, for one who has not made a special study of entomology, to secure good results in combating their ravages, is neither extensive nor difficult to obtain. In apply- ing remedies, the first thing to be considered is the nature of the attack, so that the most appropriate remedies may be made use of. It will be found, upon examination, that all injuries to vegetation by insects, conform to certain general plans in accordance with the form of the mouth parts of the attacking insects, and therefore all remedies must be applied upon broad, general principles, dependent upon these structural characters. The mouth parts of insects are all made upon one or other of two plans, they are either, 1, in the shape of jaws (Fig. 2), by which the substance of their food is masti- cated (Fig. 3); or 2. they form a hollow tube, by which the food is sucked up in a liquid condition. (Fig. 4). For insects of the first group, as a Colorado potato beetle, a caterpillar, or a grasshopper, all that is necessary is to to apply to the foliage which it is desired to protect, some poisonous material which will not injure the plant, but which, being consumed with the leaves, will destroy the insects devouring them. Such a class of materials we have in various compounds containing arsenic. The best known of these is Paris green. For the second group, in which the insects do not masticate their food, such remedies would be useless, for the insects, having their mouth parts in the form of a long, slender beak or tube (Fig. 4), could pierce through these poisonous sub- stances on the outside of their food, and extract the juices upon which they subsist from below the surface. Well known examples of this second group are the mosquito and the plant-lice, or Aphides. For these and similar insects it is necessary to make use of remedies which do not require to be eaten but which act by mere contact with their bodies, or by giving off some volatile Fie 3. noxious principle. For this purpose, preparations of eoal oil or carbolic acid are useful, as well as the vegetable insecticide known as “insect powder,” or pyrethrum. These remedies which I have mentioned are active remedies ; but con- trasted with these there is another class of equal importance, which are called preventive remedies, by which steps are taken to prevent anticipated attacks from taking place. Amongst these the most important are the following: High culture, by which a vigorous and healthy growth is promoted—a proper system of rotating crops, by which insects attracted to a locality by a certain crop will not have in that same locality two years running, the same plant to feed upon. Olean farm- ing, by which all weeds and rubbish are prevented from accumulating. Ohanging the é — ee i i time of planting, so that a crop liable to attack is presented to its enemies at the season of the year when they appear in such a condition that it cannot be injured. The plant- ing of “‘traps” or small strips of a favourite food-plant to draw off the attack from desirable crops. The destroying or masking the natural odour of some vegetables, by scattering amongst them substances possessed of a stronger or disagreeable scent. Of the insecticides mentioned above, one, viz., pyrethrum, deserves more than a passing notice, and its value for destroying house-flies and mosquitoes—those inveterate and insatiable enemies to mankind—should be known to everyone. For the former all that is necessary is to close the doors and windows, and puff a small quantity of the dry powder ahout the windows; in a short time the flies will be found lying on the window sills and about the room, paralyzed and dying. For mosquitoes, however, which have not the same habit as house-fiies of flying frequently to the windows, but hide in dark corners, it is necessary to burn some of the powder, when the fumes will penetrate into all the corners and recesses, and perform the same useful office. This material, too, has been found very useful out of doors for destroying insects upon those vegetables of which the foliage is used as food. Although so deadly to insects it seems to have practically no in- jurious effects upon human beings, cattle, and the higher animals. It is, to my mind, by far the best remedy for the caterpillars of the imported white cabbage butterfly. For this pur- pose it may be diluted with four times its weight of common flour, and should be puffed into the heads of cabbages, when it will kill every caterpillar it touches. Injurious insects may be divided into three classes, according to the amount of injury they are answerable for. ‘First-class pests” are those which occur every year, and do a large amount of injury, unless they are kept in check by constant vigilance. Instances of these are the Colorado potato beetle, cut-worms, as a class, root maggots, the timber- borers, the oyster-shell bark-louse of the apple, the codling moth, and the plum curculio. *“Second-class pests ” are those which occur every year, but not often in such large numbers as to cause wholesale destruction. Here, also, must be classed those which, although they may appear suddenly in sufficiently large numbers in restricted localities, to be classed as first-class pests in that locality, are not widespread, nor of general occurence every year. Under the first division of this heading may be classed the army worm, as it occurs in most parts of Canada. The red-humped caterpillar of the apple, the fall web- worm, and wire-worms. Under the second division the pear-blight beetle (X. dispar), and the canker-worm, which have appeared for some years in parts of Nova Scotia as first-class pests, but which are seldom known in other parts of Canada as injurious insects. “ Third-class pests” are those which only occasionally attack cultivated vegetation in sufficient numbers to be injurious. Here I would class the large sphinx caterpillars of the grape, Everyx mnyron, (Cram.) and Philampelus achemon (Drury), and the tomato worm, the clouded sulphur butterfly, and the common black and yellow swallow-tailed butterflies. I will now refer briefly to some of the first-class pests which have given trouble dur- ing the past year in Ontario. The two attacks, concerning which most enquiries have been made, are cut-worms and grasshoppers. For the first of these, which have been remark- ably abundant in all parts of Canada, from the Atlantic to the Pacific, several remedies have been tried ; but it must be acknowledged that their attacks are extremely difficult to meet, and although some of the methods suggested have been enthusiastically com- mended by different experimenters, great caution must be exercised in giving the credit to any remedy so far known, as being an unfailing check upon their injuries. In seasons when they appear in only moderate numbers they are, of course, much more easily treated than when, as in the past summer, they suddenly develope in countless myriads, and remedies which are generally found satisfactory, then proved entirely inadequate. A cir- cumstance which has sometimes been misleading to those not acquainted with the habits ef these insects is, that their attacks are seldom complained of until the caterpillars have grown large, and are almost ready to turn to the chrysalis state. In several instances which have come under my notice this has been the case, and by the time the farmer had made up his mind to ask for assistance, had received advice, prepared and applied his remedy, it was time for the caterpillars to disappear underground and turn to chrysalids. The remedy, however, was applied, and the attack ceased, so the remedy suggested got the credit of the whole benefit. Upon one or two occasions perfectly useless and inapplie- able remedies for the attacks for which they were used, have been reported to me as quite successful, while, as a matter of fact, the caterpillars were full-fed, and were quietly undergoing their transformations beneath the soil. Cut-worms, for the most part, are the caterpillars of dull-coloured, active moths (Figs. 5 and 6), belonging to the three genera Agrotis, Hadena, and Mamestra, and comprise a large number of species. They may be described, in a general way, as smooth, almost naked, greasy looking caterpillars, of some dull shade of colour similar to the ground in which they hide during the day. The head is smooth and shining, as also isa shield on the segment next to the head. Their habits are almost always nocturnal, lying hid by day just beneath the surface of the soil, they come out at night to feed. When dis- turbed they have a habit of curling up into a ring and lying motionless on their sides. (Fig. 5). Amongst the large number of species melts known as cut-worms, no doubt their habits ari vary somewhat; but probably those of most of them are as follows: The egg is laid in the spring, summer or autumn, and the insects may pass the winter either in the perfect moth state, or as a caterpillar, or chrysalis. Those which hibernate as moths lay the spring eggs, and the moths are produced again before winter sets in. The eggs which are laid in the summer and autumn hatch soon after, and the caterpillars either become full-fed the same season and pass the winter underground in the chrysalis state, or after feeding for a short time become torpid, and pass the winter as half-grown caterpillars. In this latter condition they may be found late in the autumn under stones and heaps of dead weeds, in the roots of grasses, or just beneath the surface of the ground. During the summer and autumn the attacks of these small caterpillars are seldom noticed on account of the abundance of vegetation. In the spring, however, this is far otherwise. The winter and the farmer together have removed from the fields all vegetation, except the crop which is to be grown, and when the caterpillars revived by the warmth of the sun and opening spring, come from their winter retreats there is nothing for them to eat but the farmers’ early crops. They are particularly troublesome in gardens, cutting of young plants as soon as planted out. When full grown they enter the ground to the depth of a few inches and turn to chrysalids which eventually produce the dull-coloured, active night-flying moths above referred to. When disturbed they, like their caterpillars, have the habit of dropping to the ground and remaining perfectly still ; from their sombre colour they are difficult to find. When at rest their wings lie horizontally over their backs and the upper ones entirely cover the lower pair (Fig 6). The upper wings are generally crossed with more or less distinct bars and always bear two characteristic marks, one about half way down the wing orbicular in shape, the other nearer the tip reniform or kidney shaped. From their nocturnal habits it frequently happens that although cut-worms. doa great amount of damage they are not recog- zed as the delinquents by some who have paid no attention to insects. They may be divided eo according to their habits into three classes. Fic. 6. 1. Those which climb trees and destroy the buds. 2. Those which live on the surface of the ground and cut off herbaceous plants, just beneath the surface of the soil; and 3 Those which combine both of these habits. Of the first class, the climbing cut-worm Agrotis scandens, (Riley) is one of the commonest. This is sometimes very injurious to the young apple trees. It climbs up the trunk after dark and destroys the young fruit and leaf buds. Of the second class we cannot have a better example than the very trouble- some ‘‘ cabbage cut-worm,” Hadena devastatria, or Argrotis Cochranii (Fig. 5). Of the third Ps" Sag AO Ea class may be mentioned the “ black army worm,” Agrotis fennica, a species which is much commoner in this district than was at one time supposed. The young caterpillars appear in May and devour many kinds of low herbs as strawberries and other garden plants ; peas and clover appear to be preferred to everything else. About the end of May its habits seem tochange and it feeds much more boldly, being frequently found feeding by day. It also at this time attacks young trees and bushes, devouring the buds and seems to be particularly partial to raspberry buds. There is no doubt that these cut-worms are very dif- ficult enemies to combat. I have found them difficult torear to maturity,and notwithstanding vast number of species the life histories of comparatively very few have been worked out. After many experiments and much observation some remedies have been devised which may be tried with a varying amount of success. I give some of those which I have myself found most beneficial. It must not be forgotten, however, that as yet we have no sure preventive of attack and I urge upon our members to give this matter their earnest consideration, so that we may be in a position to save more of the great loss they occasion. For climbing cut-worms a sure remedy is to take a sheet of bright tin, six inches wide and roll it around the base of a tree so that the edges overlap and it forms a tube through the middle of which the tree passes. This may be kept in position by having the lower edge pressed into the ground and tying a piece of twine round the outside, a modi- cation of the same device which may be used in gardens, is to cut out the top and bottom of tomato cans and place them over young cabbages, tomatoes, etc., the heavy-bodied caterpillars being unable to craw] up over the smooth surface. Another remedy I have found useful for climbing cut-worms, is to tie a strip of cotton-batting round the trunks of trees which also they are unable to crawl over. Spraying trees with Paris green, half an ounce to one pailful of water, will destroy these as well as many other kinds of cater- pillars which attack young foliage. The remedies for the second class or surface cut-worms are somewhat different of application. The caterpillars are essentially vagrants, not remaining in one place for any length of time, but wandering about at night from plant to plant. The remedies of which I have the greatest hope for this class are preventive, and consist of keeping down weeds and destroying all refuse in the autumn, so as to deprive them of food and winter shelter; and late ploughing by which the hibernating insects will be disturbed and exposed to the effects of weather and the attacks of insectivorous birds at a time when the food supply of the latter is limited. Poultry will be found valuable assistants in an orchard. In spring, attacks may be prevented by placing round the young plants some substance with an obnoxious odour. The most effective of these remedies I have found to be sand or sawdust saturated with carbolic acid or coal oil, a small quantity of which may be sprinkled round each plant or between the rows. Fresh gaslime used in the same way acts equally well. Another remedy suggested by Dr. Riley, by which they may be de- stroyed in large numbers, is by setting poisoned traps between the rows of the crop attacked. These are made as follows: Having procured a supply of some succulent plant as grass, clover, or even lamb’s quarters, tie them in loose bundles and sprinkle them heavily or dip them in Paris green and water, then take them and place them between _the rows in the fields. The lamb’s quarters (Chenopodium album) is a favourite plant with cut-worms, and during the past season I noticed frequently where rows of this plant had been Jeft standing between fields, that it was much more eaten than the crops on either side. As this weed springs up everywhere in cultivated ground and also is very easily destroyed, [ cannot help thinking that this observation might be turned to good effect by leaving strips of it for a time to attract these insects. Where one has been at work in the night, it can be at once detected by the withered top of the plant, and the caterpillar will generally be found just beneath the surface of the ground at its root when it may be destroyed. The “army worm” has been reported as injurious from several localities in Ontario ; but specimens of the true army worm (Leucania unipuncta, Haw) have only been sent in from one locality, namely, from the new settlement at Lake Temiscaming. A few, however, were bred from caterpillars taken on wheat at Ottawa. Of these many were attacked by a parasite, which Prof. Riley has identified as a new species of Apanteles. 10 All the other consignments of these insects which were received proved to be the cater- pillars of the clover cut-worm (Mamestra trifolii). They appeared in large numbers during the month of August and did considerable damage, particularly in fields of peas, turnips and mangold wurtzel. This insect seldom appears in Canada as a serious pest, nor from the condition of the consignments received by me do [ anticipate that we shall suffer from their attacks again next year. Of five lots of caterpillars sent from different localities, nearly every specimen was found to be parasitised. One lot of over a dozen caterpillars only gave, instead .of moths, specimens of Ophion purgatum, an active and beneficial Ichneumon fly, from the other larve were reared Tachina flies. A fact which has frequently been observed with regard to these cater- pillars, and one which gives great comfort, is that whenever they increase largely in numbers they are invariably checked by the appearance of friendly parasitic insects. It must be remembered that all insects are not injurious, but on the other hand that many are very beneficial, preying upon and destroying injurious kinds. These belong to dif- ferent natural orders. Amongst the Hymenoptera we find the Ichneumon flies, The female is, as a rule, provided with a long slender ovipositor, by means of which she inserts her eggs beneath the skin of her victim, or, as in the case of our largest species Thalessa lunator, which has an ovipositor between four and five inches in length, pushes it into the burrow of the woodboring host. The eggs of some are laid upon the outside of the skin and not inserted beneath it. These parasites are some of them as 7halessa external feeders lying alongside of their hosts, they pierce through their skins and suck out the juices, some, and probably most, as the grub of the Ophion above-mentioned, after hatching, lie inside the cavity of the body of the caterpillar, growing with it and feeding upon its blood, but avoiding all vital portions. When full-grown they either eat their way out and pupate in the ground or complete their changes inside the dead caterpillar. Of the Diptera or two-winged flies, there are several spezies of Tachina flies, which closely resemble our common house flies. These lay their eggs on the surface of the skin of the caterpillar, to which they adhere firmly. When the young maggot hatches, it eats its way through the skin into the body of its host and thrives at its expense. In addition to the above there is a class of parasitic fungi which attacks caterpillars when thzy appear in large numbers. One species Hntomophthora virescens, Thaxter, has done good service in this district by keeping down the larve of Agrotis fennica. The work of this beneficial fungus was detected again this year. The other attack which I have mentioned as having been of exceptional severity during the past season was that of various kinds of locusts. These are generally incor- rectly spoken of as grasshoppers. Early in June the fields in the neighbourhood of Ottawa were found to be swarming with myriads of tiny locusts. Later in the season these developed and committed serious depredations upon almost every green plant of a few feet in height. Their numbers were so great that ordinary remedies were useless. In an effort to protect some special plants a mixture of bran, sugar and arsenic, as sug- gested by Prof. Riley, was used and certainly killed large numbers, but the dead bodies and every green thing near them were soon demolished by the survivors. Mechanical apparatus for catching and destroying them would have been the only way to deal with them after they attained the perfect form. If, however, the hay fields had been cut about a fortnight earlier, I believe enormous numbers would have been destroyed. Hay was cut about the first of July in this district, and just at that time the first perfect specimens of our commonest species Melanoplus femur-rubrum (fig. 7), and M. atlanis were observed. Had the hay been cut about the 20th June, as it might have been without injury to the crop, the greater part of the first brood must have perished. In a crop like hay, which covers the ground thickly, there is very little active vegetation at the roots, but a great deal of moisture is kept from evapora- ting. As soon as the crop is cut all that is left on the fields above the surface is at once dried up by the action of the sun and air and the plant does not shoot up again for some weeks. In very wet seasons, of course, this takes place sooner. Last July, and the end of June were excessively hot and 11 dry in this section, and what grass was left on the fields after the hay was cat could not possibly have supported the large numbers of locusts which afterwards devastated our crops. By waiting until lst July they had reached the final stage in which they can fly, and were enabled to migrate from field to field, which they could not possibly have done in their earlier stages by hopping, for it must be remembered that their wings do not grow gradually until they reach their full size, but appear suddenly after the last moult. Locusts pass through seven stages—the egg, two larval stages, three pupal stages and the perfect insect. In the larval stages there is no appearance of wings; after the second moult, however, small wing pads appear ; these increase gradually during the two succeeding moults, but when the pupal life is completed and just before it moults the last time and becomes perfect the wing pads are only about a quarter of an inch long. When the last moult takes place, however, and this only takes a few moments when the time comes, from these short wing pads are unfolded copious gauzy wings over an inch in length. Ina few hours these harden and are ready to transport their bearers from place to place upon their mission of destruction. An attack upon the hay crop, which is receiving the careful attention of the members of the society at the present time, is one known as “ Silver-top.” It has been noticed for some years that early in June the top joints of some of the flowering stems of June grass, also called “ Kentucky Blue Grass,” (Poa pratensis, L.) and later on in the month those of timothy (Phlewm pratense, L.) turn white as though prematurely ripened. Upon examination these are found to have been injured above the top node. Many causes for this injury have been suggested, but as yet it is still undiscovered. The most prevalent idea is that it is the work of a kind of Thrips, but this is by no means proved. The lower part of the top joint has the appearance of having been sucked dry by some suctorial insect ; the tissues of the stem apparently not being torn as in the case of the wheat-stem maggot (Meromyza Americana). The only observation so far made which appears to me “to be of importance is that the attack is worst in old and exhausted meadows. This suggests breaking up such lands and manuring freely. The result of this treatment will be seen next year upon some fields where this has been tried. This attack is very similar in its effects to that of the wheat-stem maggot upon growing wheat, and like it, has steadily increased during the last three or four years. It is to be hoped, however, that as more information is gathered with regard to these attacks, practicable remedies will be discovered. The many species of timber-boring beetles which attack our pine forests are receiving special attention from our members. The apple worm, the caterpillar of the codling moth, (Carpocapsa pomonella), has been destructive in many localities ; but by judiciously spraying the trees directly the petals of the flowers had fallen many fruit growers considerably lessened this evil. The injuries to the ciover-seed crop by the clover-seed midge are being also much reduced by the adoption of the system recommended in our reports of pasturing or cutting the first crop before the middle of June. The Colorado potato beetle and the gooseberry sawfly are no longer to be feared, as - easy and (when properly applied) perfectly harmless remedies have been discovered in Paris green for the one and hellebore for the other. I must not delay you longer, but before I close I have to draw your attention to two works of exceptional interest, the first is one entitled ‘“ Entomology for Beginners,” by Dr. A. 8. Packard, of Providence, R.I. This is of great interest to us all, for not- withstanding, as I have endeavoured to show you this evening, the real and recognized importance of Entomological studies, we had not until this appeared any book of low price and convenient size which could be used as a class book in schools. This was a great want which is now filled by Dr. Packard’s book. Another want of equal promi- nence was some good illustrated book which could be used as an introductory work for the use of beginners without their having to procure a number of reports and large volumes. Copious instructions are given for collecting, preserving and classifying insects, as well as references to the leading works on the different branches of the science. The section treating of classification is perhaps too much condensed, but will be found very 12 useful. An excellent chapter is given upon injurious and beneficial insects, enumerating some of what we should call the first class pests and giving the most approved remedies. The other work to which I wish to draw your attention is Mr. Scudder’s, “‘ Butterflies of the Eastern United States and Oanada.” This magnificent work, of which I have here an advance copy of the first part to show you, is the result of twenty years’ constant study by one of our best Entomologists upon a single subject. No work has ever appeared in any country upon a single branch of science where such thorough and complete information is given of the objects discussed, nor which has been so lavishly and accurately illustrated. The technical descriptions are very long and carefully worded, which gives them a special value. Descriptions of insects are sometimes too short, the object of the describers being only to give such facts as will lead to the infallible identification of the species. In Mr. Scudder’s work the excellent illustrations will accomplish this end, and the descriptions have been made use of by the author for recording systematically in one place, every available item of knowledge, even to the most minute structural detail. These will be studied with avidity by all specialists. The work is to be lightened throughout by the introduction of a series of descriptive essays upon all the interesting problems which arise in the study of butterflies. At the beginning of my address I drew your attention to the increasing popularity with which entomological studies were regarded at the present time, and in the name of the Society I thank you for your presence here this evening. We take it as no small compliment that the honourable Minister of Agriculture for Ontario should take the trouble to come all the way from Toronto on purpose to attend our meeting, and we beg to publicly thank him, and also Mr. John Lowe, the Deputy Minister of Agriculture for the Dominion, for this manifestation of their interest in our Society, which will doubtless be of much benefit to us. Personally, ladies and gentlemen, I beg to thank you for the patience with which - you have listened to me in laying before you a statement of the work we are now doing and hope to do in the future, and I trust your verdict will be that the Entomological Society of Ontario is doing good work of general utility to the country at large. JAMES FLETCHER. During the discussion which followed the address the President begged leave to add a few words with reference to a subject which he had inadvertently omitted. It was not upon insects, but was intimately connected with economic entomology. Referring to the introduction of the English sparrow he spoke as follows:—A subject demanding immediate attention at the hands of economic entomologists, as one of the influences which materially affect the amount of insect presence, is the great and rapid increase in the numbers of this bird. Introduced into Canada but a few years it has already increased in some places to such an extent as to be a troublesome pest, and steps should be at once taken to exterminate it. Iam perfectly aware that some will oppose this view. Many from sentimental and so-called humane but mistaken motives, urge strongly the claims of these audacious little miscreants as useful insectivorous:birds. After a careful investigation of the matter, however, I am fully satisfied that, although during the breeding season they do undoubtedly destroy many soft bodied insects as food for their young, this good office is by far outweighed by the harm they do in driving away truly insectivorous birds, and by their direct ravages upon grain crops. Now, this question is one of great inportance and no matter of mere sentiment. If these birds are to any great extent insectivorous, it would be extremely rash for a society like ours, whose object is to preserve crops from the attacks of insects, to recklessly advocate the destrue- tion of their natural enemies. I shall not dwell further upon this subject, as an elaborate paper has been prepared upon their habits by Mr. W. E. Saunders, who is well qualified for the task ; but I believe their introduction into North America was a mistake which is deeply to be deplored. 13 The Hon. Charles Drury next addressed the meeting. He said that he had not come to deliver a speech, but he had travelled five hundred miles in order that, as the head of the Agricultural Department of Ontario, he might show the importance which the Gov- ernment he represented attached to the work of the Entomologists. He considered that the small grant annually made to the funds of the Society was amply repaid by its practical work, and mentioned as an instance the immense saving to the country effected by the President’s discovery of the remedy for the clover-seed midge. Sir James Grant spoke in graceful terms and delivered a very interesting address. He described the importance of entomology in its various aspects and referred to the work of some of its greatest masters, from Aristotle and Pliny, in ancient times, to LeConte, who had described so enormous a number of species of beetles, and whose lamented death was so great a loss to science. He described its relations to other departments, especially to medicine, and mentioned as an instance the fact that bacteria had been intro- duced into the blood by the bite of mosquitoes. He paid a high compliment to the President for his practical and interesting address, and for his enthusiastic devotion to the science, which had deservedly won for him the recognition of the Dominion Government. Professor Saunders rose to move a vote of thanks to the President for his valuable address. He gave a short account of the history of the Society and its work, and men- tioned the fact that there were only two of the original members present besides himself, viz., Dr. Bethune and Mr. E. Baynes Reed, who had been concerned in its organization twenty-five years ago. Sir James Grant seconded the vote of thanks, which was put to the meeting by Dr. Bethune and unanimously carried. Rev. Dr. Bethnne then proceeded to give a brief address, in which he strongly urged the importance of encouraging young people in their instinctive fondness for collecting insects. It was not only a most useful pursuit from an educational point of view, but led to great results in developing a love for science and a steady increase in the number of its votaries. As one of the pioneers of the society, he was delighted to see for the first time at one of its meetings the Provincial Minister of Agriculture, and also the Dominion Deputy Minister. He expressed his pleasure also at the presence of so many ladies, and trusted that they would bring to the aid of entomology all those gifts of deftness and neatness which they so eminently possessed. For their encouragement he mentioned that the most distinguished entomologist in England at the present time is a lady, Miss E. Ormerod, of St. Albans. In acknowledging the vote of thanks Mr. Fletcher took occasion to refer to one point which he had overlooked, namely, the injuries inflicted by “that miscreant, the English sparrow,” whose exterminrtion he strongly: advocated. The Hon. W. Drury stated that this destructive bird was no longer under the protection of the Act of Parlia- ment respecting insectivorous birds, and that everyone was at liberty to aid in reducing ats numbers. The meeting then adjourned. At 10 o’clock a.m. on Saturday, a meeting of the Council was held for the transaction of business, and after its adjournment the Society continued its proceedings. The reports of the Secretary-Treasurer, the Librarian, the delegate to the Royal Society of Canada, the Montreal Branch, and the delegates to the Entomological Club of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, were presented and adopted. The following gentlemen were elected officers for the ensuing year : President—James Fletcher, F.R.S.C., F.L.8., Ottawa. Vice-President—E. Baynes Reed, London. Secretary-Treasurer—W. E. Saunders, London, 14 Librarian—E. Baynes Reed, London. Curator—Henry S. Saunders, London. Council—J. M. Denton, London; James Moffat, Hamilton; Gamble Geddes, Toronto; W. H. Harrington, Ottawa; Rev. T. W. Fyles, M.A., South Quebec, (and the former Presidents who are ex-officio members, Prof. Saunders, F.R.S.C., F.L.S., F.C.S., and Rev. C. J. 8. Bethune.) Editor of The Canadian Entomologist—Rev. 0. J. S. Bethune, M.A., D.C.L., Port Hope. P Editing Committee—The President, Prof. Saunders, J. M. Denton, H. H. Lyman, Dr. W. Brodie (Toronto). Auditors—J., M. Denton and E. B. Reed. Delegate to Royal Society of Canada—H. H. Lyman, Montreal. REPORT OF THE COUNCIL, The Council presented their report for 1887-8 as follows : 1. They have much pleasure in recording the continued progress of the Society ; the membership has been considerably increased during the year and the prospects are encouraging for still further accessions to the roll. 2. The Council have noticed with great satisfaction that the important Department of Agriculture has been placed under the charge of a separate Minister of the Govern- ment. They desire to avail themselves of this opportunity to tender their respectful congratulations to the Hon. Charles Drury, who has so recently accepted the important and responsible position of Minister of Agriculture for the Province of Ontario, and to assure him that the members of the Entomological Society recognize the value of his long and practical experience as an agriculturist. 3. The Canadian Entomologist, the organ of the Society, has been issued with promptness, and it has maintained to the full its well earned reputation as a scientific periodical. It is the intention of the Council to endeavour to make its value and useful- ness still more marked, and to publish papers on economic and popular entomology, more especially adapted to interest beginners in the study of this branch of natural history. The chief object of the Entomological Society is to familiarize the fruit-grower and the agriculturist with the many and varied forms of insect life, and while teaching them to distinguish between friends and foes to endeavour to discover and apply practical remedies for insect depredations. 4, During the past season the attention of the Society has been called to what is known as “ Silver-top” in the hay crop, which, in some districts has seriously affected the value of the yield. It is believed to be the work of a ‘‘ Thrips.” Acting under the suggestion of the Society, experiments have been tried in ploughing up the old pasture lands where the pest seemed most injurious, and it is hoped that this treatment may be found beneficial. Close attention will be given to this matter during next season. 5. The Council desire to be informed of any insect attacks on the various crops, and they invite, as heretofore, correspondence on these matters, and will gladly hold them- selves in readiness to give any practical information and assistance that may be in their power. 6. The Library has been added to during the year and now forms a very valuable collection of natural history works of reference. 7. The fine collections of the Society have received the attention of the Council during the year. The Lepidoptera have been carefully revised and rearranged in the most suitable manner, so as to afford opportunity for comparison. It is intended, as soon as possible, to treat the collection of Coleoptera in the same manner. 8. In accordance with the custom of the Society, a deputation was sent to attend the meeting of the Entomological Club of the American Association for the Advance- ment of Science. The President (Mr. Jas. Fletcher) and the Editor (Rev. Dr. Bethune) attended the session at Cleveland, Ohio. Mr. Fletcher had the honour of being elected 15 President of the Club for the ensuing year. Aided chiefly by the efforts of the delegation, the City of Toronto was chosen as the place of the next meeting, in 1889, of the Associa- tion. The Council invite the cordial co-operation of the members of the Society in making the meeting a successful one, especially to the Entomological and Botanical Olubs. 9. The report of the delegate to the Royal Society is presented herewith. 10. The accounts have been duly audited, and will be submitted as usual. Respectfully submitted on behalf of the Council. W. E. SAUNDERS, Secretary-Treasurer. ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE SECRETARY-TREASURER. Receipts, 1887-8. SEE AEGRTIDPOVIGMMEVOAT. 5 «6 n)o0. 5s cle wie wile d)e)aie a bunlele afered wid’ $85 59 oo a a ES ee ea bg aN Oe ne a 583 61 Sales of Lntomologist, pins, cork, and advertising........ er 324 19 SENET EOPSRIG et 8S. i hii d onic ei <2 eis nt alae! 0 4 1,000 00 MRE a Meee, PE Os ei. u « btatin olen ayer thors ald Suniel an oh OE 8 76 $2,002 15 IN te Ens ea ore ak sn are << apa Maite » MR aided eye hk $601 66 Expenses of report and meetings ........5.0iceceeece cane 411 08 RE are alo a ade vse aay sh aim elias % wo efatelokjaie sikh aie. a 331 38 aR EE REA EIIS I or a sine « aYdeha, 4 tia LG win Culule mrdhridiot 71 00 PxgeennG HAG. MOPCHATIGISS ©... 5). a. 0 isn oto vino d)eld Oeretb ae hice 175 66 eT E CPERIESERE RSE ee uot ate = 2) SPaiwes & tescle wars oreo a ad alin ei Sees 225 00 PRIDE eee Slee 5 ents ole eae Mies Ska mdi nse giao, neon oe 40 00 RPE (yo ds oy clan! clas os w= SoBe esi cote Xero airatarhs vias aE IE 23 91 $2,002 15 We certify that we have examined the above statement with books and vouchers, and found the same to be correct. E. B. REED, : J. M. DENTON, } Auditors, REPORT OF THE LIBRARIAN. I beg leave to submit my Report as Librarian of the Entomological Society for the year ending September 30th, 1888 :— The total number of books now on the catalogue is 987, and there are a number of volumes waiting to be bound. During the year some valuable additions have been made to the Library by purchase and exchange, and the departments of Zoology and Botany have been increased. 16 Among those of special interest are :— Rolleston’s Forms of Animal Life. Claus & Sedgwick’s Text-Book of Zoology. Jordan’s Manual of the Vertebrates. Merrian’s Mammals of the Adirondacks. Ridgeway’s Waterbirds of North America. Manual of N.A. Birds. The A.O.U. Code and Check-List of N.A. Birds. Coue’s Key to N.A. Birds. Capen’s Oology of New England. Sachs’ Lectures on the Physiology of Plants. De Bary’s Lectures on Bacteria. - Comparative Morphology of Fungi, Mycetozoa and Bacteria. Bower & Vine’s Practical Botany. Henston’s Origin of Floral Structures. Wood's Class-Book of Botany. Bessey’s Botany. Culpepper’s Complete Herbal. The books are in good order and well protected, and due record is kept of all books borrowed. ; It will be necessary that additional cases should shortly be provided. The Canadian Entomologist has been regularly issued and mailed, and the back volumes and numbers are carefully stored and made easily available when required. The electrotypes and wood cuts are in due order, and it is suggested that sheets be prepared for use of those requiring them, shewing the various orders properly classified and arranged. I would submit for the consideration of the members the great desirability, in the interests of the Society, that an effort should, if possible, be made to have the rooms open at stated times for free reference and inspection by the public. The cabinets have been thoroughly gone over, and the Lepidoptera rearranged, since their return from England, and printed lists of Lepidoptera have been prepared and distributed to members, shewing the desiderata required to fill up and complete the collection. Respectfully submitted. E. BAYNES REED, Librarian. REPORT TO THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA, As delegate from the Entomological Society of Ontario, I have much pleasure in submitting a concise report of its work and progress during the past year. The Society, although nominally an Ontario institution, and largely supported by a liberal annual grant from that Province, is composed of members scattered all over the Dominion, besides having associate members throughout the United States, as well as scattered all over the world. For the past fifteen years a branch has been maintained in Montreal, and though we have there suffered a severe blow during the past year in the death of our esteemed President, Mr. G. J. Bowles, an enthusiastic entomologist, and for several years a mem- ber of the Editorial Committee of the Canadian Entomologist, I have great hopes of our being able to keep the branch in active operation. — ~---} 17 The monthly journal of the Society, the Canadian Entomologist, has been regularly issued during the past year, and still continues to hold its place as the leading magazine devoted exclusively to entomology published on this continent. lt has completed its nineteenth volume and entered upon its twentieth. The former consists of 240 pages of reading matter, with one plate besides the index. The subject matter is fully up to the standard of former volumes, both in interest and importance. Three new genera and sixty-two new species were described in it, and the contributors to its pages, amounting to thirty-seven in number, embrace a considerable portion of the active and eminent entomologists of this continent, as well as others of less note. For a number of years past one of the most important and valuable features of the Entomologist has been the very full descriptions of the preparatory stages or life histories of a considerable number of butterflies and some beetles, which have been contributed by entomologists eminent in their respective branches. These descriptions have been accumulating from year to year, and now amount to a very large number in comparison with the number of those whose early stages were known fifteen or twenty years ago. The annual report of the Society for the year 1887 has been somewhat delayed, not having yet been issued to the members, but it is expected to be distributed within a few days and will no doubt be quite up to the high standard of the reports of previous years. The very important collection of insects exhibited by the Society at the Colonial and Indian Exhibition was duly returned to the Society’s headquarters at London, Ont. Upon examination it was found that some of the specimens had been badly damaged on the journey, as was naturally to be expected, and that many others had suffered very much from the long continued exposure to the light at the exhibition, as must inevitably occur under similar circumstances. The Society has accordingly issued a list of species required to place its collection again in perfect order, and, though the list is large, many have already been received, and it is to be hoped that the remainder of the specimens needed may be forthcoming from the members at no distant day. The establishment in connection with the Department of Agriculture of the Central Experimental Farm, under the able direction of Mr. William Saunders, a former presi- dent of the Entomological Society, and the appointment to the position of Entomologist in connection with the same of so able and active an entomologist as Mr. James Fletcher, the present President of the Society, is likely to prove of vast importance to the country. The active work which is now being carried on will certainly prove of great benefit to the agriculturists of this country, not only by showing what crops it will be best to grow, but also how to preserve those crops from the destructive ravages of their tiny insect foes. H. H. LYMAN, ANNUAL MEETING OF THE MONTREAL BRANCH. The fifteenth annual meeting of the Montreal Branch of the Entomological Society of Ontario was held on May 8, 1888, when the following officers were elected for the ensuing year :—President, H. H. Lyman; Vice-President, F. B. Caulfield; Secretary- Treasurer, E. C. Trenholme ; Council, J. F. Haussen, A. F. Winn. The reports of the Council and Secretary-Treasurer were read and on motion adopted. _ Mr. Lyman shewed some curious varieties of Callimorpha confusa taken by Mr. Bethune at Credit and Port Hope, Ontario. Mr. Winn shewed some interesting Geometers taken at Montreal and other parts of Canada. 2 (EN.) 18 FIFTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE MONTREAL BRANCH OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOOIETY OF ONTARIO. The Council beg to submit the following report for the year 1887-1888 : It is with profound regret that your Council have to record the death, early in the past year, of our most highly esteemed President, Mr. George J. Bowles, after a pro- longed illness. Mr. Bowles’s enthusiasm for entomology and his untiring exertions to promote the welfare and success of the Branch, as well as his many amiable personal qualities are well known, and his premature death threatened the very existence of our Society in this city. i Your Council, however, determined to make every effort to keep the Branch in ex- istence, and have great hopes of being able to do so in spite of the great loss which has been sustained. On account of the President’s illness no meeting was held after the annual meeting until July 20, when a special meeting was convened to pass resolutions upon his death. After that sad event no attempt was made to hold any meetings untii the winter had well Set in, since which three meetings have been held at which the following papers have been read :— 1. Notes on the Genus Colias.—H. H. Lyman, published in Canadian Entomologist. 2. Canadian Diptera.—F. B. Caulfield. 3. List of Orthoptera, taken in the Canadian North-west by Mr. James Fletcher.— F. B. Caulfield, During the year one member of the Society, Mr. W. H. Smith, has resigned, and one new member, Mr. A. F. Winn, has heen elected. The collection left by Mr. Bowles was purchased by a friend of McGill University and donated to that institution, forming.a most valuable addition to its magnificent museum. In conclusion, your Council would strongly urge all the members to renewed activity in this our favorite science in which so much remains undiscovered and awaiting investi- gation. The death of our late President instead of discouraging us should beget greater zeal and a determination to keep up the Branch in which he took such great interest. The whole is respectfully submitted. H. H. LYMAN, Vice-President. Papers were read by (1) the Rev. T. W. Fyles on “The Hypenide of the Province of Quebec ;” (2) Mr. J. Moffatt on ‘‘ Some Curious Proceedings of the Larve of Huchetes egle Feeding Upon the Milk-weed ;” (3) Mr. W. E. Saunders on the English Sparrow, strongly recommending its extermination ; (4) Rev, T. W. Fyles on “ The Sphingide of the Province of Quebec.” Mr. Fletcher, in discussing this paper, remarked upon the colours of Sphinx 5-Maculata, and said that the dark forms’seem to be hardier than the pale green ; he had observed also in Papilio asterias that the green pupe emerged much sooner than the brown ; he had obtained no less than four broods of this insect this year. (5) Rev. T. W. Fyles read “ A Memoir of the Late Philip H. Gosse,” and ex- hibited a photograph of this eminent naturalist and his late residence. (The above papers are all published below.) Mr. Moffatt stated that he had taken Papilio chresphontes this summer at Hamilton, and that he had seen in that neighborhood a specimen of the now rare Pieris protodice. Mr. Fyles mentioned that he had taken G'rapta gracilis and fawnus at Quebec in Septem- ber ; Hepialus gracilis in the Township of Dunham ; and Hepialus auratus in the Town- ship of Brome. Dr. Bethune had found Grapta J. Album numerous at Port Hope in September, and brought some living specimens to the meeting ; these will be taken care of during their hibernation, and efforts will be made to obtain their eggs in the spring. 19 ES ES The following gentlemen were elected members of the Society :—Rev. Prof. Symonds, ‘Trinity College, Toronto; Rowland Hill, London; Mr. Brown, Free Press, Loudon; A. L. Poudrier, Donald, B.C. ; Arthur M. Bethune, Port Hope; E. M. Morris, Toronto. It was decided to hold the next annual meeting in London immediately after the «lose of the meeting of the American Association in Toronto in August. After passing a vote of thanks to the Mayor and Council for the use of the City Ifall, the meeting adjourned. NOTES ON THE HYPENIDZ OF THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. BY THE REY. THOMAS W. FYLES, SOUTH QUEBEC. For the first time since I have resided at South Quebec the hop-vines in my garden have this season been infested with the larve of Hypena humuli, Harr. Throughout July the ravages of these destructive insects were continued, and by the end of that month the foliage on the vines was very thoroughly skeletonized. In their attacks on the leaves, the larvae commenced operations from beneath, biting holes through, and enlarging them till the fleshy portions of the leaves were entirely gone, and only the ribs and veins remained in unsightly tangles. At the slightest disturbance the larvz would throw themselves to the ground, and, on reaching this, would jerk themselves about for a second or two, and then remain quiescent, but contorted out of all caterpillar shape. The body under such circumstances is doubled back, the head thrown to one side and the legs protruded from the rounded segments ; and, as the under side of the creature is much lighter in colour than the upper, it can readily be conceived that the whole appearance, both in hue and shape, is so changed that even an insectivorous bird would fail to recognize the bonne bouche that had so adroitly slipped from under its bill. When full grown the larva is about eight-tenths of an inch long. It loops slightly in walking. In colour it is pale glassy green. It has a darker green dorsal line and white side lines, The under part of the body and the legs are greenish white. The head is green- ish white dotted with black. The larve appeared in different stages all through the month of July, and were green in all their stages. I mention this fact because Professor Packard says that when half grown the larve are of a pale livid flesh-colour. Difference of climate may have something to do with the variation. Fresh imagos continued to appear all through the month of August and in the first week of September. For the destruction of the larve an application—by means of a syringe—of Paris green suspended in water would probably be found effectual. And, as the Jarve appear before the blossoms of the hop, such an application might be made without fear of injuri- ous consequences. Should the use of Paris green be thought undesirable, an application of strong soap-suds would be found beneficial. The long protruding palpi of the perfect insects of the genus Hypena have suggested ‘the name ‘‘Snout,” by which the moths are familiarly known. The Hyprenide belong to a group of insects that have been called Deltoides from the Greek Delta (A)—the outline of a Delta moth in a state of repose resembling that letter. . Characteristics of the Genus Hypena. Imago :—Antennz long and filiform ; palpi very conspicuous, curved upward at the tip ; abdomen slender, sometimes crested on the first and second segments ; fore-wings somewhat falcate, bearing scaly tufts on the upper surface. Larva :—Long, cylindrical, active, has fourteen feet only, loops but slightly. Pupa :—Slender, pointed, contained in an imperfect cocoon among leaves. Descriptions of Hypena Moths taken in the Province of Quebec. Humuhi, Harris.—Expanse of wings, 1.2 in. Fore-wing : Grey, sometimes brownish grey ; inner line and elbowed line much indented ; between them avdark brown patch 20 extends from the costa for nearly half the width of the wing ; a brown dash extends from the farther of the two inward points of this patch to the tip ; subterminal line indicated by a row of black dots ; on the brown patch and near the inner line are two tufts of black scales ; and, near the elbowed line, is another tuft of the same. Hind-wing, grey, bordered by a black dotted line and light grey fringe. Head and thorax, brown. Abdo- men, grey. Achatinalis, Zeller.—Expanse of wings, 1.3 in. Colour, light reddish brown—the hind-wings lighter than the fore-wings. Inner line, slightly curved, brown ; elbowed line, white, wavy ; the space between forming a band of darker colour. Towards the nearer costal angle of this band is a small black tuft. For about half the distance between the elbowed line and the subterminal line the wing is of a paler and slightly rosy hue ; then, extending to the subterminal line, there is a band of dull brown. The subterminal line is wavy, scalloped, interrupted, black with a grey edging. Apical dash, grey. Perangulalis, Harvey.—Expanse of wings, 1.1 in. Colour, grey varied with light warm brown. Inner line, curved, white, with an outer margin of brown ; elbowed line, nearly straight—one slight wave near the costa, white with an inner margin of brown ; the space between these lines somewhat darker in colour than the rest of the wing—has one small black dot of raised scales in its inner costal angle ; subterminal line, beautifully scalloped, black, interrupted. All the wings are margined with brown. Perangulalis is the most beautiful species I have taken. Vellifera, Grote.-—Expanse of wings, 1.4in. Colour, light warm brown mottled with darker brown. Inner line, sharply indented on the costa; a small tuft of dark scales at the opening of the indentation ; elbowed line, slightly wavy, touched by a small dark brown patch at a slight distance from the costa; both these lines are dark brown bordered with a lighter hue ; they are connected at their nearest approach to each other by a cross line of brown ; subterminal line, wavy and less distinct ; a brown cloud extends from the apex about half way along the hind margin. Scabra, Fabr.—Expanse of wings, 1.3 in. Fore-wings, dark brown of an umber shade ; hind-wings, nearly as dark. Inner line, indented, somewhat obscure ; elbowed line, with a very marked tooth éxtending outwardly, not far from the costa. On this line, near the hind margin, are two tufts of raised scales. In the space between the lines there are two such tufts. Subterminal line, wavy. NOTES ON LARVA OF EUCHETES EGLE. BY J. A. MOFFAT. On the 20th of August last, whilst strolling amidst a most luxuriant growth of milk weed, Asclepias cornutus, I came on a brood of Euchetes Egle larve, about two-thirds grown, whose movements arrested my attention. They were situated on three tiers of leaves, the upper one more than half eaten, the second one not so much, the third one not at all; on the two upper ones the caterpillars were in the position usually taken by them when feeding in company, that is, resting on the edge of the leaf side by side, heads all one way, bodies at an acute angle with edge of leaf. When my eye first caught them they were mostly engaged in jerking their heads vigorously from side to side, the pivot of the movement being about the centre of their length, whilst every now and again one and another of them would throw itself off the leaf and fall to the ground, others would start for the opposite side of the leaf, run as if pursued, and go over the edge. Very soon there were none left on the two upper leaves and my attention turned to the lower one, in the hollow of which was a little heap of caterpillars, probably dropped there from the leaves above. As I looked at the confused mass [ thought they must be dead; as they remained quite motionless I stirred them with my cane and found them lively enough, their heads all pointing inwards and each as much as possible with its head under its neighbour. [I thought of Ichneumon as probably the producing cause of such strange conduct. There was a small glossy black Hymenopter running about on this leaf, but during my observations it showed no inclina- —— 21 tion to interfere with the larve. Whilst 1 was watching them a bumble bee flew close over them. They instantly seemed to become frantic, jerking violently, whilst a number of them stampeded, going over the edge of the leaf with a bound. I siw one rubbing the back of its head on the leaf ; it seemed to be quite consvious that it had long tufts of hair to deal with. In the operation it raised its head well up, turned it a full half round, then brought it down slanting, bending all the tufts to one side, pressing hard, then sweeping rapidly the other way, and this it did several times without stopping. I saw one throw itself completely over on its back, and wriggle after the manner of a dog scratching its back on the ground, even to the raising of the centre of its body, and rubbing only its head and rump. THE ENGLISH SPARROW. BY W. E. SAUNDERS, LONDON, ONTARIO. The sparrow question, as it is now familiarly termed, has certainly been a much debated one of late, and while not a few persons to whom the bird is an old acquaintance agree that all statements to its detriment are malicious slanders, still the bulk of evidence as well as of opinion is strongly against it, and by almost, if not quite all of those who are in the best position to know, the sparrow is unhesitatingly and sweepingly condemned. This decision has not been reached without due consideration and ample evidence. Both in the United States and on our side of the line, time and money have been freely spent in solving the problem, although most of the work has been done by our neighbours. Their Division of Zoology, in the Department of Agriculture, issued blank forms con- taining questions bearing on all points of the subject at issue, and these forms were sent to everybody known to those in charge, who would be likely to possess information of value in deciding the result of the investigation. When the reports were gathered in, it was found that while the sparrow was introduced at only a few points, chiefly along the Atlantic seaboard, it had increased so rapidly that it was fast covering the continent ; in fact, last year the new territory reported covered was about 5V0,000 square miles, which nearly equalled its total distribution for 1886, so that in a few years, probably three at the outside, we shall see it covering our whole continent. One of the greatest objections to its presence is that it crowds out and drives away our native birds, and in this respect the results of its residence among us are even worse than the effects of the summer visits of the cowbird, about whom a few words may be allowed in passing. It is a matter of public notoriety that the cowbird leaves the hatching of its eggs and the care of its young to the tender mercies of other birds, usually smaller than itself, but it is not so well known that very often this intruder, by its large size and rapid growth, absorbs the attention of its foster parents, and the legitimate occupants of the nest are first starved and then thrown out of the nest, the result often being that when the intruder is full grown it is the sole occupant of the nest, having caused the death of from three to five small birds, any one of whom would far exceed its murderer in usefulness. Therefore, every farmer would be doing a service to himself if he would endeavor to lessen the number of cowbirds in his neighbourhood, and thereby directly increase his stock of insect-eating birds in the succeeding summer. There is, however, a bright side to the cowbird question, and that is found in the fact that while the supply of the celebrated reed bird of New York and adjacent cities, consists chiefly of red-winged and rusty blackbirds, the number of cowbirds entering into it is no small one, and as the other birds decrease we may hope to see the latter species form a larger proportion of the total bulk consumed, until its numbers becomes so far reduced that we shall not seriously notice its baneful presence. But no such hope comes to our relief when we consider the ways of the sparrow. They do not utilize the attentions of other birds to rear their young—if they did there would be a limit to their increase, as there are few nests of our native birds containing eggs after the beginning of July—but this foreign intruder extends its work as long as 22 the weather is favorable, three or four broods of four to six each being the usual number of young raised in a season, and asit generally breeds in town it is not subject to the attacks of carnivorous birds and animals to the extent to which our native birds are troubled. Out of a large number of stomachs of adults examined by the writer, so much as fifty per cent. of insects has been found, the proportion varying from this to none, in which latter instances the contents generally consisted entirely of road-pickings and grain. The stomachs of young birds taken from the nest usually contained from one-quarter to one-half of insect remains, but instances are not wanting where stomachs even of unfledged young contained nothing but road-pickings, although the belief that they feed their young to a considerable extent on insects is amply proven. Their numbers in our country are not such as would lead one to believe that they might commit havoc among grain fields, but the record they bring with them from Europe shews this to be their habit, and already reports of great damage to single fields are coming in from different. localities, and thus public opinion is being aroused to the probability that they are destined to be a factor in determining the results of agriculture in our country. Reports have reached the writer from different directions around London that they have seriously affected the yield of wheat from certain fields, and it is within the range of the experience of almost every gardener that they sometimes do serious damage to the buds of fruit trees and shrubs, and also that they often attack the ripe fruit itself. That they cannot be depended on to attack any particular insect every time it appears is shown by a recent letter from the President of our Society, in which, after referring to their attack on a scourge of apple aphis, and stating that he saw one devour a larva of the common tent caterpillar, he says, “On the other hand, when trees have been swarming with Clisiocampa Americana (the tent caterpillar), as in 1887, the sparrows flew into the trees in large numbers, but I never saw them touch a caterpillar except in the above-mentioned instance.” Some people in the country realize the fact that this bird is an unmitigated nuisance; one striking case having recently been brought to my knowledge, where a farmer living close to the city limits of London, where these birds abound, goes to considerable trouble to prevent their permanent access to his farm, and as a result the trees around his house aud over his farm are inhabited by such birds as the Orioles, Vireos, Tanagers, Warblers and others, whose brilliant plumage, sweet voices and entertaining ways far more than repay him for his expenditure of time and trouble in protecting them, while they render him untiring service in ridding his farm of noxious insects which would otherwise multiply at his expense. On the contrary, other farms with which I am familiar, as a result of indifference, have for their bird music the strident tones of the sparrow, and instead of having the foliage of their trees and shrubs kept in good condition by the ceaseless activity of our native songsters, their houses are made foul, their tempers tried and their crops attacked by this intruder, who takes upon himself the onus of crowding out many and driving out more of the original avian inhabitants. This state of affairs cannot but cause grave concern to those who have given their attention to the matter, but as yet nothing has been done towards the extirpation of the nuisance beyond recommendations to the public looking to the lessening of their numbers in various ways, such as preventing them from breeding by destroying nests whenever possible, taking down houses put up for their accommodation, as well as those erected for other birds and usurped by the one in question, and refraining from feeding them at all times, which may sometimes result in starvation in winter. In England, where the bird is indigenous, the damage done of late years has been enormous, and it has been stated by Miss Eleanor Ormerod, in a letter to the Times, of January 13th, 1885, that the ravages on wheat have been “estimated by judges of the farm crops in some districts to amount to one-third of the crop,” and Miss Ormerod is one of the most promiuent economic entomologists in England, and has devoted a large portion of her life to the study of the bearings of entomology on Agriculture, and has included the sparrow in her labours, affecting as it does so largely the results of agricul- ture in that country. In a paper read before the Farmer’s Club, April 30th, 1885, Miss ey ee ie nl « desti have affect almos and s is sho to the the ¢ swarb flew i the al N one st close i to pre aud o and ot repay him u multit result insteac ceasele and th out mé AL. attenti nuisan in vari _ possib] other | times, Ir enormc¢ Januar farm ci one of | portion include ture in 23 Ormerod condemned the sparrow on all counts, judging both from evidence and inference and she strongly recommends it for wholesale slaughter. That tbe extermination of the English sparrow would be a great boon to Canada, the writer has no doubt, and for the benefit of those who may wish to lessen the numbers of this bird around their dwelling places, it may be mentioned that the Ornithologist of the Department of Agriculture at Washington has had experiments made with a view to determining the most convenient, etlicient and economical poison for use, and the simplest method of preparation. It was found that of the common poisons, strychnine was much the quickest, but arsenic was better suited for the purpose, most birds that were fed on arsenic in the morning dying in the night following, when they would be in their nests or roosting places, and thus their poisoned bodies would not often endanger the lives of domestic animals, particularly in the winter, when they seek the most secluded places for roosting purposes. The best form of presentation was one part of arsenic to fifteen of cornmeal by weight, mixed dry and fed wet. If whole grain, such as wheat, is used, it is well to moisten the grain with a little water to which some gum has been added, so as to cause the poison to adhere to the grains, There is a little association in St. Thomas to which the writer would like to call attention, which has been doing good work with small outlay. By private subscription a fund was raised, and the members of the association, mostly boys who have the good of the birds and their country at heart, gave their own captures and services free, and spread the news over the town that so much a dozen would be given for eggs and so much each for heads ; and the spread of sparrows in that city promptly received a severe check. In view of the possibility of similar organizations elsewhere, it may be recommended that as the females are the ones who are most actively engaged in perpetuating the baneful species, the price set on the heads of females in the breeding season, that is from March until the end of August, should be at least double that of the males, as, if the females can be exterminated, it goes without saying that the males will soon die out without any special assistance from man. It is generally held that until the Government take up this matter and vote a.sum of money for the purpose, the increase of these birds will not be materially retarded, and certainly the sooner this is done the better for the country, and the more expeditious and less expensive the work will be. That it will come to this sooner or later, few that have given the matter much attention can doubt, as, even. though the disgust and inconvenience caused to the residents of cities be not sufficient to call for its suppression, the time is coming when the damage caused to farm crops will become immense, assuming national proportions, and then one might almost say it will be too late, steps will have to be taken, and at an enormous expenditure of time and money the evil will be wiped out. NOTES ON THE SPHINGIDA OF THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. REV. THOMAS W. FYLES, SOUTH QUEBEC. The family Sphingide is amongst the most interesting of the families of the _ Lepidoptera. The large size and graceful outlines of the larve, and the beauty, both of form and colouring, of the perfect insects, at once attract the eye and win the admira- tion. The name Sphingide is given to this family because of the habit which the larve of many of its species have of curving the body into the attitude of the Egyptian Sphinx. The perfect insects are called Hawk Moths; their hovering motions and the length and shape of their clean-cut wings have suggested the name. Sometimes, aiso, on account of their resemblance in shape and movements to the smallest of our feathered summer visitants, they are very appropriately styled Humming Bird Moths. The earliest of the family to make their appearance are the pretty yellow-belted moth (Amphion nessus), and the Clear Wings, or Bee-Moths (Sesia thysbe and Sesia diffinis). These, in the eastern townships, are often found in company, hovering over apple-bloom. At Quebec they frequent the lilacs. I took, at lilacs, this spring, a lovely little Sesia of the size, and somewhat of the 24 appearance, of Z'hysbe. On comparison it is found to have striking peculiaritics. Its antennz are blue back, and more slender than those of Thysbe. The upper part of the head, thorax and basal abdominal segments is of a rich olive green. Between this green and the deep Venetian red of the middle segments of the abdomen is a whitish fringe. Above the eye, and extend- ing to a point half-way beneath the hind wing, is a white line, which broadens as it approaches its termina- tion. ‘The under part of the head and thorax is white. A reddish brown patch, extending from the eye to the end of the thorax, separates this from the white line above mentioned. On the sides of the two last segments of Ha. & the abdomen are tufts of yellowish hairs, those on the last projecting, so as to give the abdomen the appearance of a truncated ending. The usual abdominal tuft is pointed and not flattened, as in Zhysbe. The under side of the abdomen is red- dish brown, with a few white hairs on the sides between the segments. The legs are red throughout. The cell of the primaries has no bar ; and the transparent disk of the hind wing has only five veins. Is this insect Chamesesia gracilis ? Thyreus Abbotii (Fig. 8 represents the moth and caterpillar) is said to have been taken at Hull. I have never met with the insect. I have found the larve of Hveryx cherilus in the eastern townships, and at Como, on the Ottawa, feeding upon grape-vines. At South Quebec it feeds upon the Virginia Creeper. The larva of Ampelophaga Myron (Fig. 9) also, I have found in the townships, feeding upon the grape-vine. The moth is shewn in Fig. 10. Of Ampelophaga versicolor I found one larva and the chrysalis (Fig. 11) ina neglected bottom land in the Township of Brome. It was full fed, and I could not determine its food plant. From it I raised a very perfectspecimen of themoth. Deilephila Chamenerii (Fig 12 repre- sents the moth), may be found in its larval state feeding upon the ——— Willow Herb (Zpilobium angustifolium). Its favourite haunts are neglected, stony spots in cultivated fields. The instinct of the mother insect leads it ap- parently away from pasture lands, where there is danger to its offspring from cattle, to the safer spots that I have in- dicated. In the counties of Brome and Missisquoi the larve may sometimes be met with in abundance. I have found them of two prevailing colours—green Fic 12. and madder brown. Those of the latter colour seem to be the more hardy. I have had no difficulty in raising the moths from them. With the green type I generally failed. The moths may be taken in the evening at lilac blossoms, ig aT GEO ital . Waals! et a Fic 13. Deilephila lineata (Fig 13 represents the larva and Fig 14 the moth) frequented my garden at Cowansville, making its appearance about four o’clock in warm autumn after- noons. It was also met with in the grounds of Col. Hall of East Farnham. It hasa dashing, rapid flight, and flies low. 26 Fie 15. Two fine larve (Fig 15) of Philampelus pandorus were sent to me by I. J. Gibb, Esq., of Como, P. Que.,a few yearsago. They were found in his vinery. Unfortunately the journey by post was too much for them, and they perished. (Fig 16 represents the Pandorus moth.) AP Vy alr 27 ‘lise otra ee ue a Fie 19, Philampelus achemon (Fig 17 the larva, Fig 18 the pupa, and Fig 19 the moth) was very abundant in Missisquoi and Brome Counties, both on the, grape vines and the Virginia creeper. Fie 20. Calasymbolus myops (Fig 20) is not uncommon. I have found the larve on the wild cherry (Prunus Pennsylvanica) and have taken the perfect insect at light. 28 Of the rare and beautiful Calasymbolus cerisii I have two specimens (male and female) taken at light, in my bed-room at Cowansville. Concerning this insect, Strecker says (Lepidoptera p. 59) :—‘‘ This is certainly the rarest of all the heretofore described N. American Sphingide ; but three authentic examples, all male, are known ; the first was figured and described by Kirby, in 1837, who did not know in what precise lecality it was captured ; this example perhaps may still be preserved in the British museum, otherwise it is probably lost ; the second was taken by the late Robt. Kennicott at Rupert House, in British America, and is at present in the museum of Comp. Zool, at Cambridge ; this is the largest specimen of the three, expanding about three inches. The third and last, the original of figure 3, I received in a small collection of things from near Providence, Rhode Island.” Calasymbolus geminatus is abundant in Missisquoi county. Paonias excecatus is plentiful in the Eastern Townships. The larve are found on apple trees ; and the moth is taken at light. Of Cressonia juglandis, I have one specimen taken at Cowansville, and another taken at Quebec. Both were attracted by light. I have a fine specimen of T'riptogon modesta, (Fig 21) which was taken at Sherbrooke, P. Que.; and I have seen several other specimens that were captured in the same locality. I have found the larve of Ceratomia amyntor in abundance in the Township of Farnham. They feed upon the elm, and their side-lines closely resemble the ribs on the curled leaves of the tree. When the leaves turn brown, the larve also change colour, maintaining the illusion that is their security from their foes. Deremma undulosa I have found in the townships and at Quebec. It feeds upon the ash, etc. I have taken Dolba hyleus in the Township of Dunham abundantly, at flowers after sunset. Phlegethontius celeus was formerly rare. It was seldom that one came upon the larvee in the wide expanses of our potato-fields ; but since the advent of the potato beetle and the use of Paris green as an insecticide, the larve have been frequently found. The fact is, the moth has shunned the puisoned plants, and has laid her eggs on the unprotected potato and tomato patches in our gardens. I have seen as many as fifty full grown larvee on one such patch of tomatoes in the neighborhood of East Farnham. I possess one specimen only of Lillema coniferarum. It was taken at light at Cowansville. Fie 22. Sphinx drupiferarum (Fig 22) is one of the most common of our Sphinges. “* My , first captures were from trees and fences on Mount Royal many years ago. I have'frequently raised the insect from larve taken in different parts of the province. (Fig 23 represents the larva and Fig 24 the chrysalis.) Sphinx Kalmice and Sphinx Chersis are also common, and may be captured after sun- down at milk-weed, perennial phlox, etc. Sphinx Canadensis is rare. I have four specimens captured at flowers in the dusk of the evening. They were taken in the Township of Dunham. Sphinx eremitus I have met with only at Cowansville. I obtained a number of larve from a bed of garden sage in the grounds of E. Carter, Esq., of that place. I also found the insect upon sage in myown garden, and upon mint (Mentha Canadensis) in the neighbouring fields. Sphinx salvie would be a better name for the insect than any yet ven. In the following tables I have followed the classification of Grote : 30 ‘oqo “tadeed0 VIOLsa1A ‘OULA ‘as we10 -odery (“‘norbhir4 vyunosap sepoeidg ‘pray ey} uo sult “D4Z) WOM Jopidg — (*»2v0,/ Jeajyueo YystUMOrg = “YSTaTy A “Ipnu vojpzy) TeMOY JO4XuTG [oot ‘*deerd-YSIN[_ |(opis yore uo g) sourf-eprs onbrqg |* ‘vq ey} Uo YsITYM—uUooIy | ‘your gli tT: * snpli@yy xAreany | “BLIYS OSLOASUBIY SMOIOUIN \T (‘wrxu0fanbunb ‘SOUT [BSLOp-qns Usxorg, |sayo7nd ynoypm ‘umoaq YSIppoyy 7 gj. °°" * epeures Jo varery sysdojadmy) sedoory wiursara [Buta MoTad vB Ut aporoqny ‘UMOIG PUL UdeAd PlETYyS [BU\ “M07/0K 40 Waa4b ‘oura-odvry) |3[0v[q ev usoy Jo eovjd uy |*sour-oprs poanoloo - ayepoooyg |/o sayoqnd ym ‘umosq ysippoy | “your g] ‘ts ****epeur jo varery | p ‘Hyoqqy snerdyy, BIST ON pale eleneie|*|* 2ieisa* s.g.08 “uMOIT |****TEqQUIN soUT[-opis pus [esdog |**"""' ***"***UMOIG ayeToDOYDH | ‘your gg] ttt: * snssoyy uo1rydury *suoly “gud YIM (‘sniowup) uoyyMeyy |-epuvsd oy pue yoryq ‘pat eyvusyg perepi0og asor [[Np yyvou (‘snduporwoydruliy) KaroqMoug YIM peppnjzs pue ‘Moy ‘sodiays Opis wears YSIMor[o -T9puy) ‘poyvynurvas ‘soprs (smyndo wnwingrd) Treq-moug |-fd yy poddy onjq 94 8ry |qysry ‘odiaqs esxop yYstppoy. joyg uo xoyzep ‘usesd ystmoyox | your g|-o--- eqsfyy viseyrsommy (wn “‘q{UOULZES 4S.Iy JO OpIs JoYQ1a UO VSpla UOpfos esteasuvsy @ £ morad ored , ‘“Yyvousepun por xarep oymMuwa7) opyonshoeuoy ysng |i s**t cts: “Vl |sour[-opls ‘oul ;estop uses yavqy |‘ueess oped sapis ‘oaoqe ong | ‘yout Fp [oct ** STUIBIp SlLreule yy mN | 2 oO my a “ “SMUV AL ONIHSIOONTLSICL - eh ‘. SINVId-d0o U wn0" oI ‘4 Ah SaKV i NUOFT JO WAOTOD UMHLO UNV SUNTT-ACTS YNO10ON TVAANAY e N oq = 3 2 5 ‘ssulyIvU Aepnoyaed pus : Sanojoo Surpreaord “uvjd-pooy sqr uosy “aeppidacyeg yQoyy yavyT v jo sofods oy} ourmmojop 07 ASo;oMOZUT jo yUopNyg oy} pre oJ aATAV], VW ‘OHH NO AO AONIAOUd AHL AO SUVTIIGUALVO HLOW MMVH ol em a a i | ee chee a a cs a a | EE | EE *poye[nuvis pperys peu woo18 YIVCT “SOUTT-opIs MOTTO ‘yjvoued use1d yaep “MOTTIM [tts cst qepora joped uoaeg = ‘ourT[esaop YsIPYAA |eAoqe YsIPYM ‘uoats ofeg | your Z/**** snyeurmoeds snjoqurdseyey - ‘uUMOIq YSIppoat sopovardg ‘SOUI[-OpIs MOT[OA FY SIA H ("‘Do2-wHAa onByqo xIg ‘seyoyoTq [es -pisuuag snuntq) Aroyo pILM {°° °° ** “SOpIs O49 UO MOT[OA |-1Op-qns UMOIG-YsIppod Jo MOL W | ***meerd ysintg | ‘your Zl°-'****: sdofu snjoqurdAseleo 4 | i a nn i gn ne a LO ‘OUT YIM parap ‘aporzeqny poystjod ‘xov[q -10q seyoyed poanoloo-mred90 “UMOIG YSIp ‘dodeado viursi1A ‘outA-odvar) |v Butave, yo sdoap usoz_ |podoyjoos xis sopis oyy Saopy |-ped sparvmaoqye “ysry 4% ueorry) | ‘your ¢]°*'** ‘ uouleyoy snpedurepiy g *‘q7nouL paLyy *‘SUOTIL[NUU soVTq YAIMsSeyozed *"owyq YpIM ‘rodeo BIUISITA “autA-odvaxyy jay} qnoqe yo sdoap ‘yurg |MorjeA-twvetd OAY opis yore ug |peyjop ‘umMoaq AyoaToA Yory | ‘your Ff +*** ‘sniopuvg snpeduepy gy ‘sayoqyed uosmil1o Jur *0}0 -sopoud ‘3;oR,q puw MOT[EA SoUlT ‘draing “yvoyMyong ‘euvfsang |**** ‘**** osuvs0-YsIMo][aX |estop-qns ‘mojo our pesaoqy jt * woods YSIMOTIOR | “your g]ott tts eqyvoury vprydoptog (‘s7wuarg 0.19Y7 = -ousp) osorutaid Ssumean ‘sSULI yORTq Ur MoT[as (‘pa9n49]0 vownjnz10g) Owe] sapowidg ‘4ueULses puodas UO -sing (“wn2rpofysnbunwn2go) *yoryq plerys xyuld W ‘sepis uo syods ‘ysLyurd peoyy 10] ) YAOYMOTTIAA “OULA-odviyy jyzta paddiy Apyqsts ‘pey |mopjaA ‘“morTped oped oury [esaocy | *peystpod ‘useas-aAtjo ystumoag | "yout FZ }+-°-: * Tusuaoue YO eVlLydeltoqy .(°'290) -L0Y.aa DDSAAT) OFJLAYOSOOrT ; ' “OUTIL durwmg (‘s27n7UapII00 sny} YA par-youq yysiT sepovrdg “‘soOpIs woyoyday) ysnq-u0z4nq dureag [ott Sa giana dae ae “YSIgIyA ‘soury-apts enbyqg joey} uo Ssuruedeep ‘ueer3 yysiry | “your Z|****a0foo1saa A vseydoyedury *yorq 044 Suo[e MoT[oA oped jo yooed @ ur yos *puiyeq Morjad sour yore ‘sqods opi, oped 10 pea -eul0s ‘sould YQ poy usA0gG ‘ULs1eUL Ue0Is Yep ‘MmOTTPA ‘qodoor0 VIMLSITA “oUTA-adviy) |-JoOp Usedd-YsIN]q oO YSIppoy |e yyLA Moped oped sodtys-oprg [y7IM poyjop Appo1yy ‘uoors-vog | ‘your g]°'''*** uoIdp vsvydopedury a any Cr ee LL SS i i | LY LS i LS A TT ce se | eed ote SS *peanojoo-asox sSoTNUIds yout YIM poraAcd —_|sZay-o10,T ‘opis yore uo ueerd (‘swnbjna nburshg) OvIUT ‘oseq 4% podanojod- esor = |rexaep yy perepzog spueq (‘wumwwpy snunxDuz) YSV |‘mozfed yqim peddiy ueery | ueoad-ysiyrypm enbijdo:” “Wana oe oes ves "***m9e13 o[eg | ‘your §z ——— oo ‘Suoplnoys ey} Wo suAoy po -yoyou AYSoy anojp ‘souly-epis | (‘mwnorwampy snmp) up [rrr r ttt “UdOIT) JOPITM Ysiueots onbipqo ueasg |***"* ‘poyernuess “u9013 e[eg | ‘yout F¢ see s** JoyUAULY BIUI0}RIOD (‘2ynyn]Up *‘par-qsna sepovaidg *aqry an snyndog) «ejdod Apavquiory |i++ sete s sees eee etdang i i Ystmorje£ ‘sourf-epts onbitqg | ‘ots ttt ttt ene *ueeTy) | "your ¢ eeeeree ee e4sopour uoso4diazy, ‘oqo ‘Karo yo PIEAA (920 vhwng) Atoxor FT ‘soTnuids ‘YyBouoq WOsUITIO YIM poSspe (‘vuheu sunjine) ynuyem yorrg ysPpoelq §=yyM = “YstUMOoIg |sour[-oprs ystytyM onbiqo uoreg |* poyepnwead ‘uoo18-0[dde oyeg | ‘your $z 7° stpuvpsnt eruosseay Pes Ro Re RA ‘UMOIQ | Ysipper sopovaidg ‘opis yova ‘suOLye[NURAs ‘ojo ‘ung ‘erddy Seprs UO MoT[eA—anopoo-asoy |uo souly MoT[as enbiqo uoaog jo714yM poquiod yyim ‘use3 44307 | ‘your git snyvowoxe svluovg I |e =o So : : ‘SUUVPYT DNIHSIOONITSIC 5 Sop : INV1d-d0o J to) WAN SANV isi TOOK AAO EEO HDEIOO UHHLO UNV SUNIT-HATS TOD SERS) = N é 4 i=} ‘souLyeU Letpnoed pue OV WOW MBH @ Jo soloods oy} ourtusozop 07 ASojowoyUG Jo yuepnyg oy) pre oj aTaVy, W ‘sanofoo Suypiwaoad uepd-pooy syt woayz ‘erprda penmpog—OFTTNO FO HONIAOUd AHL dO SUVTTIGUALVO HLOW MMVH 33 | *yoryq sopowuidg ‘sed114s “Opis TSM eubryqo uvAng "099 (sypuroyfo mapngy) oBeg [rT Tt tts eidag |'seyozo[q poduys-pporysyovyq oa, |r Tt pegernueads ‘erdog | ‘your Fg} t's * +s sngtuese xutydg ‘asuvio sopowrtdg ‘ueaIs ysinyq ygIa paspe sedis *yse ogy mM ‘ouriry |** osor sourrgormos ‘ont eye jopis Moros 4ystaq onbrqo usaeg Jot ts Meads gy sag ‘een es oe eee» KINTOUG) KUL ‘your § i | *Mmor[oA -osuer10 soporadg ‘ontq oped YIM yeyg oaoqu puv ‘ucead (‘py0fyn) nrujnxy) *sopO.10qn4 YSHpv[q YALA paespae sodrags OCLs JoInvy, ulejzunour ‘yse ‘ovITT |3OV[q YI poroaod ‘ony jopis moppod oped onbrqo uoaog [ttt **' ++ * U9easd YSTMOT[O A tereeouroes © Srmrey xUTydG ‘asuvi1o yystaq soepeidg (‘saypzuap “AANVUL YIM JUOTS UL porta ps0g veeeees cnansogidnap xurydg -2090 829/99) AaroqgyovyT “wut |*****osvq 4v MoTod ‘uMOrg joqiqym ‘sodtaqs opis anbyqo uoaeg |" *** Geead-ojddw | ‘your ¢ “MOT . -oA YAIM poxtur ogi od144s [B1o4yvrT «MOI OY} Opis 19410 uo oediys Moped @ sutaey (‘sngo.wgs snurg) oud oyty Ay |' “tt ttt ust0y ONT |‘sqods por yyStaq Jo Moa pesaog |i ttt woos qysig | your gitttt sts cuMaerojzTM0O vUTOTTT rr rn rr a wr a a es i EE TT | | TT TT *MoTIOA OIe YOUM ¥sBT Og O44 gdoo *‘MI9DUD)OY JO SPULY -xo ‘youlq sapeadg ‘sedis ‘yowlq ueAe pus qeyjo pus ‘opyeutog ‘opujog | 888 '** MaeId-yoory |morpod-ysruoead onbiqo uosog |uMorq souNTgouLOSUseLd WYSE | ‘yout ¢ *£II9GATILOY AA "OVI M YGIM MOTAq (-49q0)6 sowwq) ape yourg [' tt suosuIIIQ |peSpe ‘yurd ‘soutf-epis onbiqo |" tt ttt tt Wooas-vog ‘your gyre tt snatAey eqyoq o4 THE HAWK MOTHS OF THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. A TasBLe to enable the Student of Entomology to learn the names of the Hawk Moths of the Province of Quebec from the average-size, colouring, and distinguishing features of these insects. PREVAILING COLOURS. A b E te na Expanse of wings J mess n Voc asi DISTINGUISHING MARKS. Hemaris diffinis ........ hg inch.| Wings clear with rosy-brown| Legs black. Under side of body black margins. Body brownish- yellow and black. inch.| Wings clear with rust-brown margins. Hemorrhagia Thysbe...|2 and pale yellow. A band of rosy brown, two segments in width across the middle of abdomen. Legs have much white about them. Under side of body light reddish brown and white. Cell of primaries divided by a vein. Crown-shaped tail. pale yellow bands across abdomen. Two conspicuous Several light dentate markings towards the middle of fore wings. Hind wings lemon yellow with’ dark brown term1- nal band. to| A whitish line along the back of thorax. Basai half of fore-wings lighter than the general colour. A black dot in this lighter portion near the costa. Amphion Nessus ....... 2 inchs) Rosy-prown. <1. o-clacvee Thyreus Abbotii........ 3? inch.| Dark glossy-brown......... Everyx cheerilus........ | 24 inch.| Reddish, avproaching salmon-colour. Ampelophaga Myron ...|23 inch.| Forewingsolive-green. Hind| wings dark salmon-colour with olive-green patches at anal angles. —_— —— -—— —_—_—_ | —_— 2+ inch.| Fore wings olive-green of a brighter shade than that | of the wings of Myron. | Hind wings dull salmon ' Ampelophaga Versicolor. colour with whitish inner margin. Basal part of fore-wings lighter in colour than the rest and interrupted by a darker olive-green band. No dorsal line on thorax. Basal part of fore-wing darker in colour than the rest, and interrupted with white markings. A white wavy apical dash on fore wing. A white dorsal line extending the whole length of the body. The underside of this insect is beautifully mottled with green, yel- low and white. 24 inch.| Olivaceous brown. Deilephila chamenerii .. wings roseate and black. Deilephila lineata....... 34 inch. | Olive-brown. Hind wings | | roseate and black. Hind! Two black patches bordered with white on each side of upper part of abdomen. No transverse white lines on fore wings as in Lineata. Six or seven white diagonal lines across fore wings. Six white longitudinal lines on thorax, m HAWK MOTHS OF THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC.—Continued. PREVAILING COLOURS. | DISTINGUISHING MArRKs. 2B b> - & n Expanse of wings Philampelus Pandorus.. | 44 Be Olive preene: so rves «dante | A dark olive green angular patch on each side of thorax, and irregular patches | of the same colour on all the wings. On these also are several ochreous | markings. | | 3? inch.; Reddish ash-colour, varie-| An angular patch of rich velvety brown Philampelus Achemon .. gated with hght brown. with whitish margins on each side of Hind wings pink, with a thorax. Three conspicuous patches dark-coloured hind mar- of the same colour on each fore wing, gin. | ——————— | Oe OO ' Calasymbolus myops....|24 inch.| Brown, with a slight purple} A black oval spot with light blue centre blush. Hind wings yel- in the yellow part of hind wing. low, with abrown margin. Calasymbolus cerisii..... 34 inch.| Grey shaded with warm | A large crescent-shaped white mark on | brown. Hind wings rosy. fore-wing. On hind wing a large eye- like spot, consisting of a broad black | ring with a spur to the corner of the wing, and an inner white ring with a black centre. Calasymbolus geminatus | 2? inch. Grey, shaded with warm] Two light blue spots in a conical black brown. Hind wings rosy. patch with a spur to corner of the wing. Paonias excecatus...... |28 inch. Sienna-coloured with darker} Hind margin of fore-wing much indented. | markings. Hind wings A single light blue spot in an oval rosy. black patch on hind wing. Cressonia juglandis..... |24 inch.| Grey, with sienna tinge and} Hind wings of the same hues as fore darker markings. | wings. Triptogon modesta...... 4% inch.} Fore wings greyish-olive,| Robust ‘thorax. Grey basal portion of the basal portion con-| fore wings. Head small. A white | spicuously lighter than dash in a dark olive band in centre of the rest. Hind wings fore wing. | dull rosy, with bluish patches at anal angles. | Ceratomia Amyntor uy Si inch.! Fawn-colour and brown.| A white or fawn-coloured discal spot | Hind wings fee | with a black dash attached, resting on and brown. median nerve, Fringes to hind wings | brown cut with yellow. 36 HAWK MOTHS OF THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC.—Continued. [= | ® 3 NAMES aa PREVAILING COLOURS. DISTINGUISHING MARKS. ae 3 Sek “7 li Aen Whaler ae SS Daremma undulosa....- 34 inch.| Grey, mixed with yellowish.| A number of angulated black lines in Hind wings smoky-brown. pairs crossing the fore wings. A white | discal spot margined with black, but ' without the dash seen in C. Amyntor. | Hind wings crossed by three parallel | dark brown bands. Fringes white: cut with brown. sion gist title nip lateal En ats eA eee | i rr Hyleus.......--- 24 inch.| Lighter and darker racial Numerous zig-zag lines’ some black and AL ee) of Indian ink, with a some white. A white spot on fore- tinge of brown. wing without the linear prolongations seen in S. Eremitis. Besides the | abdominal white side patches so com- mon in the Sphingidce, two rows of distinct white spots on upper part of | abdomen, | Phlegethontius Celeus ..|44 inch.| Grey, with a tinge of warm} Five orange spots in black rings on each brown. ; side of abdomen. ——— — Ellema coniferarum..... 24 inch.| Fore wings bluish-grey with] A row of conspicuous brown denticula- wings light warm brown. gin of fore wing. Two black trans- verse streaks in centre of fore wing. | brown markings. Hind tions running inward from hind mar- Fringes white. ——_——— ——_—_——— hinx j rum....|4} inch.| Rich, warm umber......... Upper part of thorax very dark, ap- SP SA Aa 4 f proaching black. Whitish lines on | margin of fore wings. Hind wings. | whitish with median and subterminal black bands and fawn-coloured margin. | — Sphinx kalmie ......... 4 inch.| Sienna-colour, resembling} Fringes to wings conspicuously rust-red,. wainscot oak, cut with white. Ss oc aha a wings. Hind wings with dark brown | wood ashes. or blackish median and terminal bands. a ee ees Sphinx Canadensis: ..... | 34 eke | Light grey, with brownish} Has distinct whitish streaks and black tinge. transverse lines on fore wings 3 also a black line bordered with white ex- tending nearly to the apex. j iti _..|3 inch,| Lighter and darker shades! On the fore wing a small white dot with CS See | es Indian ink, with a| a black border and with linear pro- tinge of brown in fore longations, several transverse black wings. Hind wings yel- streaks, and near the hind margin an lowish white with very irregular blackish line edged out- broad bands. wardly with grey. For fuller information on the Canadian Sphingide, I would refer the reader to an excellent paper by Mr. He Bayried Reed published in the Society’s Report for 1881. Of this paper I have made free use im drawing up the preceding tables. @. Wi i: 5 inch.| Dark grey, gives the idea of | Several transverse black dashes on fore 37 PHILIP HENRY GOSSE. On Thursday, the 23rd of August, Philip Henry Gosse departed this life at St. Mary- church, near Torquay, Devonshire. He was born at Worcester on the 6th of April, 1810, and early displayed a taste for Natural History. In 1827 he was engaged as clerk in the extensive mercantile house of Messrs. Slade, Elson, Harrison & Co., of Carbonear, Newfoundland. In June, 1835, he removed with his friend, Mr. G. E. Jacques (now living at Oowansville, P.Q.), to Lower Canada. He bought a farm one mile east from Waterville on the River Coaticook. During the summer he cultivated his land, and in the winter he taught the Compton village school. At this time he collected the materials for his first work, The Canadian Naturalist. The rough life of a Canadian farmer in a comparatively new settlement was ill-suited to this young man of refined tastes, and the ** noisy politics” and ‘‘ martial alarms” of the times must have jarred on his ear, attuned as it was to the music of nature. Then, too, the people of the neighbourhood were not of a class to appreciate his studies. They were wont to speak of him as ‘‘ that crazy Englishman who goes about picking up bugs.” It was well for him that, as a naturalist, to use his own words, he could find ‘“ gratification in any scene and at any season,” and that in Mr. Jacques, in whose house he boarded, he had a congenial friend. In Chapter VIII. of his work he draws a gloomy picture of an Eastern Townships’ farmer’s life, but in the preface (which breathes the modesty and piety which characterised him through life) he says: ‘‘ During a residence of some years in the Lower Province the author has felt it to be no common privilege to be able to solace himself by these simple but enchant- ing studies, . . and even now the recollection of those pleasant scenes sheds forth a lustre which gilds the edge of many a dark cloud.” In March, 1838, Mr. Gosse left Compton and settled in Alabama for about six months. His observations at this period afforded the subject matter of his Letters from Alabama, chiefly relating to Natural History. He returned to England in the spring of 1839, and published The Canadian JVvaturalist during the summer. On the 10th of August, 1844, he sailed for Jamaica to study the Natural History of that island. After a residence there of two years he went back to England, and published the result of his investigations under the title of Z’he Birds of Jamaica, A Naturalist’s Sojourn in Jamaica, and An Atlas of Illustrations. From January, 1852, to the time of his death, Mr. Gosse’s residence was at St. Marychurch, where he had a delightful residence, which he named ‘“ Sandhurst.” Attached to this were extensive conservatories, including a vinery, fernery, orchid houses, etc. For some years he was engaged in preparing works for the S. P.O. K. After that he devoted himself to the microscopic study of the British Rotifera. In 1856 he was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society. He was an indefatigable worker, usually in his Study by 4 o’clock in the morning in the summer, and by 6 o’clock in the winter, and producing on the average two works in the year. His books must number about forty, and among the scientific papers of the Royal Society upwards of fifty are from the pen of Mr. Gosse. _ Among his works are: TZenby, a Seaside Holiday; The Aquarium; Actinologia Sritannica, a history of the British Sea Anemones and Corals; The Wonders of the Great Deep; The Romance of Natural History; Life in its Lower, Intermediate and Higher Forms; Land and Sea, and A Year at the Shore. Always of a religious turn of mind, he delighted in Sacred History and Biblical studies, and a number of works of a sacred and historical character proceeded from his pen. The last of these, published in 1884, was entitled, The Mysteries of God, a Serves of Hxpositions of Holy Scriptures. One cannot often point toa life more pleasantly and usefully spent than that of Philip Henry Gosse. THOMAS W. FYLES. 38 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL CLUB OF THE AMERI- CAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. The annual gathering of the Entomologists of North America in connection with the meeting of the A. A. A. S. took place this year in the city of Cleveland, Ohio. While much regret was felt at the absence of many eminent Entomologists who have always taken an active part in the work of the Club, and at the consequent smallness of attend- ance the meeting was much enjoyed by those who were present, and the valuable papers read were received with great interest. The first session was held at 9 a.m. in a classroom of the Central High School Building on Wednesday, August, 15th, the President, Mr. John B. Smith, of Washing- ton, in the chair. In the absence of the Secretary (Prof, A. J. Cook, of the Agricultural College, Michigan), Prof. Herbert Osborn, of Ames, Iowa, was requested to act in his place. Owing to the smallness of the attendance the Club adjourned till 1.15 p.m., when the President read his annual address on ‘Entomological Collections in the United States.” In this interesting and valuable paper, which, as well as the other papers read at the meetings of the Club, will, we understand, be published in Entomologica Ameri- cana, the writer gave an account of all the great collections, both public and private, in the United States. Among general collections he especially mentioned those of Mr. Bolter, of Chicago, and Mr. Henry Edwards, of New York ; in Coleoptera he specified the- collection of Dr. Horn, of Philadelphia, Mr. Ulke, of Washington, and Messrs. Hubbard and Schwarz, and Lieut. Casey; in Lepidoptera those of Messrs. Henry Edwards, Neu- mogen, Strecker, Graef, Tepper, Holland, W. H. Edwards, Lintner, Bailey and Meske ; in special departments of Lepidoptera, in butterflies, those of Mr. W. H. Edwards, Rev.. Dr. Holland and Mr. Bruce; in the Hesperide, that of Mr. E. N. Aaron, of Philadelphia ; in the Sphingide, that of Mr. E. Corning, of Albany; in the Geometride, that of the Rey. G. D. Hulst, of Brooklyn ; and in the Tortricide that of Prof. Fernald, of Amherst, Mass. He also noticed many other collections in various orders, for which we must refer the reader to the address itself. After hearing the address the meeting adjourned till the next day. The following persons were in "attendance during the sessions: John B. Smith, Washington, D.C.; Prof. H. Osborn, Ames, Iowa; Prof. F. M. Webster, Lafayette, Ind. ; Dr, DOS Kelli- cott, Buffalo, N.Y.; Mr. and Mrs. O. S. Westcott, Chicago; L. O. Howard, Washington ;. J. Mackenzie, Toronto; A. B. Mackay, Agricultural College, Miss.; D. A. Robertson, St. Paul; S. H. Peabody, Champaign, Ill. ; ‘aii C. V. Riley, Washington ; S. B. MeMil- lan, Signal, Ohio; Rev. L. C. Wurtele and Miss Wurtele, Acton Vale, i ee Q., and others. The Entomological Society of Ontario was represented by its President, Mr. J. Fletcher, of Ottawa, and the Rey. C. J. S. Bethune, of Port Hope. On Thursday, August 16th, the Club met at 1 p.m., and entered upon the considera- tion of the President’s address ; this naturally led to a discussion upon the best materials for boxes, etc., in which to preserve collections. Mr. Howard stated that the boxes in the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Cambridge, Mass., had their bottoms made of Italian poplar. Mr. Fletcher asked for the experience of members with poplar, tulip-tree and other woods as regards cracking and splitting. Dr. Riley said that there was no wood that would not split, warp or crack; the only remedy was to have the materials kiln-dried and then soaked in shellac and alcohol. He adopted the form of boxes used in Washington for the sake of convenience rather than otherwise. The cabinets in Europe were not subjected to the same dry heat as in America, and were consequently not a guide to us in this respect. Mr. Fletcher stated that there are only two noteworthy collections of insects in Canada: (1) That of the Entomological Society of Ontario at London; it is not véry large, but is very good as representative of the Canadian fauna, while it contains many specimens from the United States and other countries. The collection of Lepidoptera is. especially good and well named, having been revised by Mr. Grote before it was sent to the Philadelphia Exhibition in 1876. In Coleoptera and other orders great care has heen taken to have the specimens well named. The collection is open to any one who desires. to examine it. (2) The collection of Lepidoptera in the National Museum at Ottawa is. 39 very good. The nucleus was formed by the purchase of about 8,000 specimens from Capt. Gamble Geddes, of Toronto. It is now being added to by the officers of the Geo- logical Survey, who bring to it from time to time rare specimens from out-of-the-way and little known regions. There are several private collections of value, but it is unneces- sary to specify them. Mr. Fletcher agreed with Mr. Smith that “types” of new species should be placed in some national collection, where they would be accessible to all students. For his part, he should always be glad in the future, as in the past, to place types, whenever possible, in the National Museum at Washington. A discussion then arose as to what is meant by a ‘“‘type.” Mr. Fletcher understands the term to mean all the specimens actuaily before a describer when he is making out his description of a new species. Some writers, however, call all specimens types that may afterwards be identified by the describer as agreeing with the originals. Mr. Howard agreed with Mr. Fletcher that only the material before a describer at the time is to be called “type ;” other specimens should be marked, ‘“‘determined by the author.” Dr. Riley thought that all the materials determined by an author might be called “types of that species,” provided that they do not vary from the original specimens. Prof. Webster considered that all typical material should be placed in some national depository, where it would be perfectly safe, and instanced the loss of the Walsh collection by fire as a calamity to Science. Collectors should be willing to sacrifice their types for the general good of Science. Mr. Smith was also of opinion that only the specimens before the author at the time of making the description are types, and that specimens determined after- wards are not really types. Mr. Fletcher referred to Chionobas Macounti as an example. Mr. W. H. Edwards had eleven specimens before him when he described the species ; these are types. Most of these specimens were imperfect. During the past summer the speaker had obtained from the original locality a good supply of specimens in perfect order, and although these agreed with the original description perfectly, they should only be labelled as ‘‘ typical,” and he was of the opinion that the describer even would not be justified in labelling them “type.” Prof. Osborn agreed with the last speaker. Thursday, Aug. 16th.—The Club reassembled at 3.30 p.m. Papers by Mr. Clarence M. Weed, on “The parasites of the honeysuckle Sphinx, Hemaris diffinis, Boisd.” and on ‘‘The Hymenopterous parasites of the Strawberry Leaf-roller, Phoxop- teris comptana, Frél.,” were read by the Secretary in his absence. Mr. H. Osborn read an interesting paper on “The food-habits of the Thripide.” Mr Smith gave an account of the collection of W. D. Bruce, of Rockport, N.Y., which was chiefly made in Colorado ; it is especially remarkable for the long series of specimens of many species of Lepidoptera. Among others he has Chionobas bore in great numbers from the Rocky Mountains, proving it to be distinct from C. Semidea of the White Mountains; also an immense series of Colias eurytheme in all its varieties, and numbers also of many species of Noctuide. Friday Aug 17th.—The Club met at 9 o’clock a.m. A paper was read by Dr. D.S. Kellicott, on Hepialus argenteo-maculatus, which he had succeeded in raising from larve- obtained in Oswego County, N.Y. It bred in the roots and stems of Alnus incana. Mr. Schwarz stated that he had taken the moth near Marquette, Lake Superior, on July 29th, this year. Mr. Smith considered it to te quite generally distributed, breeding in oak, willow and poplar. Mr. H. Osborn read a note on the occurrance of Cicada rimosa, Say, in Iowa. Prof. O. S. Westcott related the occurrence of a large gathering of butterflies about the carcase of a dead dog at Port Arthur, in June last ; one hundred and ten specimens were counted, chiefly consisting of D. archippus, and some JL. arthemis, Colias and Melitea. In the same locality he captured, July 20 to 23, nineteen examples of Melitea ; of these one was Vycteis, and seventeen tharos, eight of the form Marcia, and nine JMor- pheus. He next gave an interesting account of the numbers of Lachnosterna fusca, and gibbosu, taken at Maywood, IIl., by means of a trap attached to a street-lamp, during the months of May and June, 1887 and 1888. He also gave a list of 1,192 specimens, belonging to 65 species captured i in his trap on the night of June 13th 1888 ; of these 730 were Agonoderus comma, and 204 Lachnosterna gibbosa. 40 Mr. Howard gave an account of some recent experiments made under Dr. Riley’s direction at Washington, with kerosene emulsion as a remedy for white grubs, the larve of Allorhina nitida. He stated that the grass had died over large areas of the affected lawn, and the soil was full of the grubs. The affected portion was treated with kerosene emulsion, diluted fifteen times with water, and applied with an ordinary watering-pot ; the ground was then kept saturated for some days with ordinary water froma hose. A month afterwards on digging into the part treated, the grubs were found to have descended sixteen inches into the soil, and all had died. In the untreated parts the larve were all alive, and only two or three inches below the surface. There was no injurious effect upon the grass, even when the emulsion was only diluted halfas much. He considered that the experiment was entirely successful. In the discussion that followed, it was evident that this remedy is much too expensive for adoption on a large scale, and could only be of practical use on a lawn or plot of land of special value. Dr. Peabody stated that Prof. Forbes had found the kerosene emulsion entirely successful against the common white grub (Lachnosterna), but as its application cost at the rate’of about $100 per acre, it was far too expensive for ordinary purposes. The Club met again at 3 p.m. Mr. Fletcher gave an account of his expeditions to Nepigon, Lake Superior, in search of the eggs of butterflies. Very little is known, he stated, regarding the early stages of many of our diurnals ; of even so common a species as Pamphila cernes they were unknown. In 1885 Prof. Macoun, of the Geological Survey of Canada, collected specimens at Nepigon of a new butterfly which was named after him by Mr. W. H. Edwards as Chionobas Macounii; in 1886 and 1887 Mr. Fletcher went to Nepigon in search of this insect, travelling about 1,500 miles on each occasion, but with- out success. This year he went again early in July, accompanied by Mr. S. H. Scudder, of Cambridge, Mass.; on the first day after their arrival they caught five males ; the next day nine females were caught and caged; from these they obtained about 250 eggs. The egg is larger than and quite different from that of C. Jutta, which has been found near Quebec and bred by Mr. Fyles. Mr. Fletcher also obtained eggs of Jutta at Ottawa and reared the larve from them ; the eggs were laid on July 1st and hatched on the 16th; those of Macounii were laid on the 12th and hatched on the 27th. At Nepigon he and Mr. Scudder obtained the eggs of 14 species out of 16 that they caged. He then gave a full and most interesting account of the methods of capturing, caging and treating butter- flies in order to obtain their eggs, and mentioned that he had received very valuable infor- mation and aid from Mr. Scudder in the matter. The simplicity of the apparatus employed deserves mention. ‘Cages for all small species can be made in a few minutes by cutting off the top and bottom of a tomato can and then fastening a piece of netting over one end, either by slipping an elastic band over it or tying it with a piece of string. The female is then placed in it over a growing plant of the species that the larve are known to feed upon. These cages had answered well for all the skippers which fed on grass, and the small Argynnides. For such species as lay their eggs on the foliage of shrubs or trees bags had to be tied over living branches, care being taken that the leaves were not crowded up, but that they should stand out freely so that the female could lay, if such were her habit, upon either the upper or lower side, or on the edge of the leaves. In this way eggs were obtained of Nisoniades icelus and Papilio turnus. Another cage for insects which lay upon low plants, and which is easily constructed, is made by cutting two flexible twigs and bending them into the shape of two arches which are put one over the other at right angles with the ends pushed into the ground ; over the pent-house thus formed a piece of gauze is placed, and the edges are kept down either with pegs or earth laid upon them. This kind was useful for larger insects than could be placed in the tomato cans. In these eggs of C. Macownii, Colias eurytheme, ete., had been secured.” (Entom. Americana, iv. 159). Mr. Fletcher then described the habits of a number of the species collected, referring especially to those already mentioned and to Pyrameis huntera, Pamphila hobomok, Mystic and cernes, Carterocephalus mandan, Colias interior, Argynnis vialis, Myrina and bellona, Nisoniades persius, Fenesica tarquinius, etc. He also exhibited living larve of C. Mandan, P. hobomok and mystic and living imagines of C. eurytheme which had emerged since his arrival.in Cleveland. At the close of his address: 41 Mr. Smith expressed the gratification all present felt in listening to so lucid and interest- ing an account from which everyone would carry away many practical and valuable hints. The next paper was read by Mr. E. A. Schwarz, of Washington, on ‘‘ The Geographi- cal Distribution of the semi-tropical Floridian Coleopterous Fauna.” It was followed by a discussion, in which nearly all present took part, as to what should be considered the limits of the North American fauna, and what species should be included in the fauna of a particular region, reference being especially made to semi-tropical species that are from dime to time found in the north. The Club next proceeded to the election of officers for the ensuing year and unani- mously selected the following : President—James Fletcher, Ottawa, Ont. Vice-President—L, O. Howard, Washington, D.C. Secretary-Treasurer—Dr. D. 8. Kellicott, Buffalo, N.Y. Saturday, August 18th—A most enjoyable excursion was made to Put-in-Bay by steamer on Lake Erie. There was a very large attendance of the members of the Associ- ation, including the Entomologists. This pleasant feature of the proceedings gave the members a much better opportunity of becoming acquainted with each other than would otherwise have been the case, Arrangements were made for the excursionists to stay on shore for about an hour, and this time was made good use of by the members of the Club. The insect of most interest was secured by Mr. Westcott, who collected in large numbers by beating a small spruce tree, a remarkable Hemipteron, identified by Prof. Osborn as Emisa longipes. Many galls and parasitic fungi were also collected. Among the butterflies noted were Colias philodice, Pieris rape, and what appeared strange to Can- adian eyes at this time of year, Papilio turnus ; P. asterias and Pyrameis cardui were also observed, and a few speci- mens of Utetheisa bella (Fig. 25) were captured. The party returned to Cleveland much delighted with their day’s outing, and separated to meet next year in Toronto. BOOK NOTICES. EnTomMoLoGy For Becinners, for the use of Young Folks, Fruit Growers, Farmers and Gardeners. By A. S. Packarp, M. D., New York; Henry Holt & Co., I Vol. 8vo. pp 367. It is with much pleasure that we draw the attention of our readers to the publica- ‘tion of this work. For many years past we have been repeatedly asked to recommend some book that would serve as an introduction to the study of entomology and enable young -collectors to make a satisfactory beginning in the pursuit. Hitherto we have been unable to mention any single work that would answer the purpose, and we have felt _-constrained to tell enquirers that they must procure several books, for instance, Kirby and Spence’s Entomology, Harris’s Insects Injurious to Vegetation, etc. and even then not have what they want. Dr. Packard’s new book is certainly one that has long been wanted, though we fear that it is a little too technical in its language and too abstruse in its treatment of some of the subjects to exactly meet the requirements of beginners. We think too that the author has not been judicious in the arrangement of the matter; ‘the first two chapters on the Structure of Insects and their growth and metamorphosis will, we fear, prove rather repellant to one who has collected a few specimens and wants to know something about them and what todo with them. They are carefully written -and give an admirable summary of what every student of entomology requires to know ; ‘ut they are a little beyond the youthful mind, or the uninstructed powers of the ordi- : 42 nary farmer. We therefore strongly advise all beginners who procure this book—and_we- recommend them to get it without fail—to commence their reading with chapter VI, which contains very interesting and useful directions for collecting, preserving and rearing insects; they might then turn back and read chapters IV and V on Insect Architecture and Insects Injurious and Beneficial to Agriculture. By this time we have no doubt they will have become so deeply interested in the work that they will not be discouraged by the drier details and the harder words in the remainder of the book. The third chapter, which fills over a hundred pages, gives an admirable synopsis of the classi- fication of insects, and should enable a beginner to arrange with some degree of system any specimens that he collects. The author has departed from the usually received divisions of insects and sets forth no less than sixteen orders ; this number he obtains by sub-dividing the Neuroptera, Orthoptera and Diptera. To the new orders thus formed, he applies the novel terms Plectoptera, Platyptera, Mecaptera, etc. We feel rather doubtful about their general acceptance and think it a pity that they should have been put forth in an elementary work of this kind before they had been discussed and approved of by entomologists in general. We do not, however, wish to disparage the work; it is certainly a valuable compendium and we cordially recommend it to our readers who are beginners in entomology. The book is well written and excellently illustrated throughout, and must prove a great help to the science by furnishing young students in a convenient form with information that hitherto they could not readily procure, C. J. S. BeTHUNE. Aw Intropuction To Enromotoey. By Prof. J. H. Comstock, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. Published by the Author. Part I, pp 234, 8vo. (Price $2.00). The autumn of 1888 is certainly a notable one in the annals of North American entomology owing to the publication of so many important works. Last month we drew attention to Dr. Packard’s excellent “ Entomology for Beginners,” and the issue of the first part of Mr. Scudder’s grand work on the Butterflies of the Eastern States and. Canada. We have now before us the first portion of another admirable work, which is intended to serve as a text-book for students, and to enable them “to acquire a thorough knowledge of the elementary principles of entomology, and to classify insects by means of analytical keys similiar to those used in Botany.” The first two chapters of the book treat of the characters and metamorphoses, and the anatomy of insects ; he next discusses the orders of the Hexapoda, to which the author very properly limits insects. In this chapter he gives his reasons for adopting ten orders, the number being made up of the seven generally accepted orders and the Thysanura, Pseudoneuroptera and Physopoda ; in adhering so closely to the old classification he states that he has been greatly influenced by a desire to make his book as simple as_ possible, and “by the belief that an elementary text-book should follow rather than lead in matters of this kind,” in which opinion we thoroughly concur. The remainder of this part of the work treats of the orders Thysanura, Pseudoneuroptera, Orthoptera, Physopoda, Hemiptera and Neuroptera. In each chapter is given a general account of the order treated of, an analytical table of the families, a descriptive account of each family with in many cases tabular keys of the genera, and illustrations of the common species. Future parts will complete the discussion of the orders, and furnish chapters on the remedies for noxious insects, directions for collecting and preserving specimens, etc. Judging from the portion before us, we have no hesitation in saying that the complete work will be a most valuable and admirable manual of entomology ; in clearness and simplicity of style, in excellence of illustration and in arrangement of matter, it leaves nothing to be desired. We must not omit to mention that the two hundred wood cuts. are for the most part drawn and engraved by the author’s wife, and are very good indeed; another excellent feature is the marking of the pronunciation of the accented syllables of technical words, which will no doubt in time help very much to a desirable uniformity © in this respect. C, J. S, BerHune. 43 Insect Lire. A monthly bulletin, published by the Entomologist and his Assistants in the U.S. Department of Agriculture at Washington. Vol. I, Nos. 1to 4; July to October, 1888. This new periodical “devoted to the economy and life-habits of insects, especially in their relations to agriculture,” is a very welcome one indeed. The four parts of thirty pages each, which have thus far appeared are filled with matter of great interest to both the scientific and economic entomologist. With so able and experienced a staff as that at Washington, presided over by Dr. Riley, and with field agents at widely distant points, this new magazine cannot fail to be.most useful, and to do good work in the spread of valuable and timely information. THe ButterrLies oF NortH AmeERicA. By W. H. Epwarps. Part IV of the third series has recently been issued. It contains the usual three magnificent plates; the first represents both sexes and several varieties of Colias Chrysomelas, the second, the upper and under surfaces of both sexes of the lovely Argynnis Nausicaa, and the third fully illustrates all the stages of Canonympha Galactinus form California. The letter-press contains much interesting matter on the life histories, in addition to the descriptions of the species. New Work on JAPANESE ButTERFLIES, by H. Pryer. The task of preparing and illustrating a work upon the butterflies of Japan, after the model of Mr. Distant’s Rhopalocera Malayana, has been undertaken by Mr. H. Pryer, of Yokohama, who, with persistent enthusiasm for the past seventeen years, has been engaged in collecting the Lepidoptera of the Empire and studying their habits, The work, entitled Rhopalocera Nihonica, will appear in three parts, 4to. It is printed upon Japanese *‘ untearable paper ” made of a curious combination of the fibres of rice straw and silk. The text is in English and Japanese. The plates are drawn upon stone and printed ‘in colours by native lithographers under Mr. Pryer’s own supervision, and are truly excel- lent. The first part, bearing the imprint of the Japan Mail office, is before us. The writer, during a recent stay in Yokohama, had the privilege of examining a portion of the MS. of the Second Part and the proofs of the plates which are intended to accompany it. It may be worthy of note that the letter-press of Parts II. and III. will greatly exceed in volume that of Part L. ‘ The Japanese islands, stretching from Shumshu, the northernmost of the Kuriles, in Lat. 50° 40' N. to the Riu-Kiu group in Lat. 24° N., possess every variety of climate from the semi-arctic to the tropical. The islands of the great central group, Yesso, Nippon, Shikoku and Kiushiu, are traversed by lofty mountain ranges and dotted with volcanic peaks, some of which rise from 9,000 to 10,000 ft., and one of them to 12,450 ft. above sea-level. Upon the summits of these mountains perennial winter reigns, while at their feet a semi-tropical vegetation blooms and flourishes. In addition to the wide diversity in climates which prevails in the islands and the contiguity of colder and warmer climates due to the mountainous character of the country, there are more subtle influ- ences at work depending for their operation upon the rainfall and the aérial currents, The atmosphere is characterized in spring and early summer by an excessive humidity, surpassing that of the British Islands, while at other periods of the year there is a well marked ‘‘ dry season.” The result of these various facts, taken into connection with the additional fact that at a remote geological period the islands doubtless were connected with the Asiatic and North American mainland, has been the development of a fauna marked by a wonderfully composite character and revealing to an unusual extent the phenomena of varietal change, and, in the case of the insect tribes, seasonal dimorphism. To these phenomena Mr. Pryer has paid especial attention with the result of ascertaining that not a few of the so-called species erected by recent Entomologists, into whose hands Japanese collections have happened to fall, must be relegated to the great and ever-growing mass 44 ee of synonymical species. This is especially true of the genera Papilio, Pieris and Terias, in which seasonal dimorphism reveals itself most strikingly. The course pursued by Mr. Pryer in massing a large number of forms of the species originally described by Linnaeus as Terias Hecabe under the name Terias Multiformis, Pryer is open to criticism on the ground that the labour of the elder nomenclator should have been respected and his name retained, while the names of later writers should have been adduced as synonyms. Nevertheless the fact seems to be established beyond reasonable doubt that the species lumped by Mr. Pryer under the newly coined name Multiformis are all mere local or seasonal variations of Hecabe, Linn. It was the privilege of the writer to spend many days in Mr. Pryer’s laboratory, and he can testify to the painstaking care which he has taken to avoid error in his deduc- tions. The most surprising result of breeding is, however, one which is not alluded to in Part I. of the Rhopalocera Nihonica, since it was only definitely confirmed during the past summer, viz., the discovery that Terias Bethesba of Janson is a dimorphic form of Terias Laeta of Boisduval. The entire difference in form of the two has naturally led students unhesitatingly to accept them as widely different species. Careful breeding has established their practical identity. As the first attempt at a comprehensive and accurate survey of a part of the beauti- ful insect fauna of “ Dai-Nippon,” the new work will no doubt be hailed witb pleasure by all Entomologists who raise their eyes beyond the narrow confines of their own immedi- ate neighborhoods and seek to ascertain the truth as to the whole of nature. W. J. HoLuanp. Tue BurrerFiies or Souta Arrica. South African butterflies: A monograph of the extra-tropical species. By Roland Trimen, F.R.S., etc., assisted by James Henry Bowker, F. Z.S., ete. Vol. 1: Nymphalide; Vol. IL: Erycinide and Lycaenide. London: Trubner & Co., 1887, 8 mo. All who have studied foreign butterflies at all are acquainted with Trimen’s work on the butterflies of Southern Africa, published more than twenty years ago, under the title Rhopalocera Africae Australis. It will please them to know ‘hat there have recently appeared the first two of three volumes on the same subject, which are based, indeed, upon the old, but wholly rewritten, and with a great wealth of additions, especially on the natural history side. These two volumes comprise the Nymphalide, Erycinide and Lycaenide, in all 238 species, The Papilionide and Hesperide are to occupy the third volume with about 142 species. It will thus be seen that Mr, Trimen falls into line with all the principal lepidopterists of England in the serial order in which he here places the different families of butterflies, adopting, indeed, exactly the subdivisions and the order Mr. Moore employs in his Lepidoptera of Ceylon, which we noticed lately. But he does more than that ; for, in a long introductory chapter of 44 pp., he treats of the structure, classification and distinctive characters of the groups, together with their geographical distribution, their habits and instances of mimicry in an excellent manner, such as is very unusual in a work of this nature. It would interest every reader of the Canadian Entomologist. So, too, all the families, sub-families and generic groups are characterised with a fulness entirely proportional to the specific descriptions, rendering the work one of the best introductions to a fauna known to me. ‘These descriptions are evi- dently the work of one who is quite familiar with structure, are not copied from the work of others, but are introduced in language of the author’s own, having a speciai vaiue quite apart from the rest of the work. Nor is this all ; for the characters are drawn not simply from the complete stage of the insects, but from the Jarva and pupa as well, and these same stages are introduced in the generic description. It is unfortunate that he has not included also the egg. The work is i]lustrated so far by ten octavo plates, one of which is devoted to the structure of the wings, the head and legs of the imago; two to the early stages of a few species, and the remainder to excellent chromo lithographs of the perfect insects. The figures of the early stages are an interesting, though somewhat scanty, 45 addition to our knowledge, the most important of which is found in the larva and pupa of D’Urbania, a curious genus of Lycaeninz, in which the pupa, as well as the larva, is covered with long fascicles of hairs, as long as the width of the body. Mr. Trimen has been aided by collectors and naturalists throughout Southern Africa, to a very great extent, so much so, indeed, that he has added the name of one of them, Col. Bowker, to his title page as joint author with himself ; and the help he has received in this respect may be indicated in part by the considerable number of species which have been added to the list of South African butterflies since the publication of his first work, a total of 380 against 197. An excellent coloured map of Southern Africa, south of the tropic of Capri- corn, is prefixed to the first volume, We hope the third volume, completing the work, will soon be issued. S. H. Scupper. Cryton Butrerriizs. The Lepidoptera of Ceylon, by F. Moore, F.Z.S., Vol. I., (pub- lished under the special patronage of the Government of Ceylon) London: L, Reeve & Co.. 1880-81. 4°. The butterflies of the East India region appear to be now in a fair way of receiving their due share of attention, We have already called attention to Distant’s invaluable work on the Malayan butterflies, and to the hand-book to the butterflies of India and Burmah, by Marshall and De Nicéville. On many accounts neither uf these is so impor- tant as the earlier work on the Lepidoptera of Ceylon by Frederick Moore, which we desire to introduce to the readers of the Canadian Entomologist, principally on account of the very considerable accession to our knowledge of the earlier stages of eastern butterflies which is here given in the plates, and also to draw attention to the notes on the natural history of the insects given by Dr. Thwaites, which are embodied in the text. The work as a whole consists of three volumes ; but we speak here of the butterflies only, which are comprised in the first volume, published in 1880-81. It is a large quarto, with 71 excellent coloured plates, in which the early stages are in very many instances figured side by side with the butterflies. | Notwithstanding that it is published under the special patronage of the Government of Ceylon, the work is a costly one, and to one residing in the United States an embargo is laid upon its purchase by the fact that the duties upon such a work are so high. This single volume cost me $15 for duties and transportation alone. Thus is science encouraged with us ! We are here introduced to a new set of illustrations of the early stages of butterflies, many of which are of extreme interest, and these in every family of butterflies. It is the most important and considerable contribution to our knowledge since Horsfield’s memor- able volume. It isa pity, however, that in many instances no reference is made in the text, either to Dr. Thwaites’ notes, or Mr. Moore’s descriptive portion, as to the meaning of certain figures which differ strikingly from those of their allies. Thus the pupa of a species of Cirrochroa is represented as hanging by its hinder end, as in all Nymphalidae, but bent so at the end of the abdomen as to lie parallel to the horizontal branch from which it is suspended, much in the way that we find it in our own species of Chlorippe ; but there is no appearance in the figure and no mention in the text of any greatly elon- gated cremaster with its row of hooklets down the side, which in Chlorippe stiffens the pupa into what would seem to be an unnatural position. We have some interesting additions to our scanty knowledge of the early stages of the Lemoniinz and an unusual wealth of larvee and pupx of Lycaenine. Here again is a figure of a species of Spalgis hanging by its tail without the median girt, which is wholly anomalous in this subfamily, but, as there is no explanation of the matter in the text, it is to be presumed that it is not meant to represent the insect in its natural position, the more so as the same is the _ case in a species of Appias, one of the Pierinz, represented in two figures as hanging by its tail only, while the whole structure of the chrysalis indicates that it must have had a median girt. Very interesting are the figures of the early stages of the Papilionin, which add very considerably to our knowledge, including as they do some figures of the younger stages of the larva—presumably younger from their appendages, though here 46 again no mention whatever is made of the fact in the text. Wecall attention also to the interesting figure of Gangara, a hesperian living open and unconcealed, as I am informed by Mr. De Nicéville, and which bears long waxy filaments apparently not proper append- ages, but as long as the width of the body itself, rendering it an exceedingly conspicuous object. ; In the arrangements of families, Mr. Moore follows the rapidly growing company of the best instructed entomologists in beginning the series with the Nymphalide and placing the Papilionide just before the Hesperide. He separates the Lemoniine from the Lycaenine as a distinct family, and places the Libytheine with the Lemoniine as was done by Bates ; but he brings the Pierinz and Papilionine uuder one family heading. It has naturally pleased the present writer to see that Mr. Moore has had the courage of his convictions sufficiently to sudivide the old and bulky group so long holding rank as a homogeneous whole, the so-called genus Papilio, into a number of genera, including among the seventeen species which he catalogues no less than ten genera, following thus precisely the line which Hubner long ago undertook to establish, and which I adopted in 1872. SAMUEL H. ScuDDER. Tue BUTTERFLIES OF THE EASTERN UNITED StTaTEs AND CanaDA, with special reference to New England, by 8. H. Scudder. Imp. 8vo. Cambridge, pp. 1-40 and 105-208, Part 1, lst Nov. 1888. For some months Lepidopterists and Librarians have been anxiously awaiting the appearance of Mr. Scudder’s monumental work on the Butterflies of New England, which, as is well known, has been constantly engaging the attention of this keen observer and careful student for the last 20 years. Through the courtesy of the author we have been favoured with advance sheets and plates of Part I, which is to appear on the Ist Nov., 1888. From the well known high character of Mr. Scudder’s past work, doubtless much will be expected by the scientific world of this long promised book, Judging from the number under consideration we believe few will be disappointed. No work has ever appeared, in any branch of science, where such thorough and complete information is given of the objects discussed, nor which has been so copiously and accurately illustrated. An introduction treats, with the greatest detail, of the general structure of butterflies from the egg to the imago, and includes a chapter upon their classification. This is followed by a systematic treatise in which ‘“‘not only every species,” (embraced within the scope of the work) “but also every genus, tribe, sub-family, and family is described and discussed with a fullness never before attempted, except in individual cases, including in each instance not merely the perfect form, but, when possible, the egg, the caterpillar at birth and in the succeeding stages, and the chrysalis, together with the distribution, life-history, habits and environments of the insect, in which a great accumulation of new facts and observations is embodied.” In the part before us we have pages 1 to 40 of the introduction covering the structure of the egg, the caterpillar and the chrysalis, and the beginning of the deserip- tion of the perfect insect. There is then a break and the pagination continues again at page 105, where the second section begins with a short chapter on the families of butter- flies. This is a reproduction, slightly altered, of the table of classification which Mr. Scudder has already published in the Can. Ent., xix., 201, in which he divides the butterflies into Vymphalide, Lycaenide, Papilionde and Hesperide, an arrangement virtually the same as that given by Bates and adopted by Packard, in which the genera (Eneis and Cercyonis are considered the highest of the butterflies. At page 109 the systematic treatise begins with the Vymphalide or “ Brush-footed butterflies.” With this family, as with sub-families and genera throughout the work, when possible analytical tables are given for their arrangement, based upon the egg, the caterpillar at birth, the caterpillar at maturity, the chrysalis and the imago. The first sub-family is the Satyrine, including six genera, of which Wnevs is described first. Under each species we find first complete and careful technical descriptive details of 47 structure for all the known stages. These are printed in rather smaller type than the rest of the book, a fact which will considerably facilitate reference. Then follows a general description, giving any interesting features in the distribution and habits of the perfect insect and larva, the food plant, variations and enemies, and lastly a list of the points upon which further information is needed. On page 127 appears the first ofaseries of essays, of which there are to be over 70 distributed throughout the work, and to which the author has applied the somewhat inelegant title of ‘Excursuses.” These discuss separately all the interesting problems which arise in the study of butterflies (whether of distribution, structure, history, or relation to the outer world), in themselves forming a complete treatise on the life of these insects. These will be a charming feature of the work by means of which a book, which must necessarily contain a large amount of technical scientific description, will be _ made attractive to many who will subscribe to it merely to possess the most extensive and beautiful book which has ever appeared on the diurnal Lepidoptera of North America. The scope of these may be inferred from the titles of those which occur in the first part. . The White Mountains of New Hampshire as a home for butterflies. . The clothing of caterpillars. The general changes in a butterfly’s life and form. The eggs of butterflies. The modes of suspension of caterpillars. SUR o2 bo The species described in the first part are Hneis semidea and @. jutta, Cercyonis alope and C’. nephele, Enodia portlandia, Satyrodes eurydice, Neonympha phocion and the beginning of the description of the genus Cissza. The nomenclature, we are told in the prospectus, follows the rules of the American Ornithologists’ Union. As is well know Mr. Scudder’s views upon some points with regard to nomenclature are very extreme, and it must be conceded that he has so far few followers. This state of affairs, however, we anticipate will be changed. After many years of close study upon a special subject by so able a student, the writer, at any rate, is prepared to weigh carefully, without previously condemning them, his views as expressed in this his greatest work. The iJlustrations are, as above stated, most profuse, superbly executed, and each is accompanied by copious explanatory text, which will be bound opposite each plate. The eight plates in part I, are as follows: No. 1 is a beautifully coloured chromo- lithograph of butterflies, showing in most instances both the upper and lower sides. The complete work will contain about twelve of these plates. The second plate, No. 14, is uncoloured, but is exquisitely engraved, and by some may possibly be preferred to the last. It shows seventeen figures of butterflies artistically grouped. There are to be five plates similar to this. The next plate, No. 18, comprises eight small maps, showing separately the distribution of the different species treated of in part I. There will be fifteen of these sets of maps. No. 46 shows scales of butterflies, and there will be six of this nature. No. 52 gives the heads of butterflies. The work on this plate, drawn by J. H. Emerton, is very beautiful. There are to be eight others like it. No. 67 is the first of three plates showing the micropyles of eggs magnified highly. No. 70 is devoted to magnified figures of young larve just after leaving the eggs, and there ‘will be three others like it. No, 93 is a physicial map of New England, prepared specially for this work by John H. Klemroth, under the supervision of the Geographer of the U.S. Survey. These, however, do not by any means exhaust the styles of plates which will appear, for in subsequent numbers new sorts of subjects will come forward, all of which will be fully illustrated whenever figures can make the text more intelligible. Special articles upon hymenopterous and dipterous parasites are to be prepared by the able specialists, Messrs. L. O. Howard, of Washington, and Dr. Williston. In fact, all the phases of life passed by the insects treated of as well as the important circumstances connected therewith, will be presented to the reader in the most complete manner possible. There will be about two thousand figures on ninety-six plates, of which over 48 forty will be coloured. The small inconvenience of not always having all the plates referred to in the text issued at the same time with it, cannot of course possibly be obviated in a systematic work, where everything is treated fully in its proper place under each species, and in which the number of subjects needing illustration in each part is greater than can be shown on the quota of plates for that part. The whole will be issued in a year, in twelve parts, each to contain eight plates and about 150 pages of text. JAMES FLETCHER. JOHN ABBOT, THE AURELIAN. BY SAMUEL H. SCUDDER. It has been a fortunate thing for the study of butterflies in this country that the earlier students were those who devoted themselves very largely to the natural history of these insects rather than to their systematic or descriptive study. It was indeed a natural and healthy result of the poverty of external resources in earlier times, and I have thought that it would not be devoid of interest to present a few facts concerning the life and industry of one of these earlier naturalists, who worked to such good purpose and accomplished so much under circumstances that would now seem very forbidding. A unique figure, perhaps the most striking in the early development of natural history in America, is that of a man of whom we know almost absolutely nothing, excepting what he accomplished. With one exception, all our knowledge of his personality comes through tradition. No life of him has ever been written, excepting a brief notice, by Swainson, in the bibliography of Zoology, to which Mr. G. Brown Goode has kindly called my attention. It is not known when or where he was born or when he died, scarcely where he lived or to what nationality he belonged. Even the town where he worked no longer exists. His name alone remains; and though we have access to nota little of his writing in his own round hand, his signature cannot be discovered.* John Abbot was presumably an Englishman, as the name is English, and he is said by Sir. J. E. Smith to have begun his career by the study of the transformations of British insects. When not far from thirty years old, and probably about 1790, he was engaged by three or four of the leading entomologists of England to go out to North America for the purpose of collecting insects for their cabinets. After visiting several places in different parts of the Union he determined to settle in the “ Province of Georgia,” as Swainson calls it. Here he lived for nearly twenty years, in Scriven County, as I am informed by several persons through the kindness of Dr. Oemler. of. Wilmington Island in that State, returning to England probably not far from 1810, where he was living about 1840, at the age “ probably above eighty.” It is rumored in Georgia that he owned land there, aud all that can be learned of him comes from persons beyond middle life, in that State, who remember heariug their parents speak of him. Col. Charles C. Jones, the Georgia historian, informs me through Dr. Oemler, that ‘while he remained in Georgia in the prosecution of his scientific labours his headquarters were at Jackson- borough, then the county seat of Scriven County. Here his work on the lepidoptera of Georgia was largely prepared. All traces of this old town have now passed away.” It is supposed that he also employed himself as a school master in this place, but this is purely traditional, and his occasional bungling, not to say ungrammatical sentences, rather indicate a lack of schooling on his own part. What we certainly know regarding him is that he entered into relations with John Francillon, a silversmith, in the Strand, London, who had a famous collection of insects and an extensive entomological correspondence. Francillon undertook to supply subscribers with drawings of insects and plants by Abbot, as well as with specimens, the latter of which, says Swainson, ‘‘ were certainly the finest that have ever been transmitted as articles of commerce to this country ; they were *Mr. W. F. Kirby has kindly made many researches for me at the British Museum, the Linnaean Society, etc. 49 ES always sent home expanded, even the most minute ; and he was so watchful and inde- fatigable in his researches that he contrived to breed nearly the whole of the Lepidoptera. His general price, for a box-full, was sixpence each specimen, which was certainly not too much considering the beauty and high perfection of all the individuals. Abbot, how- ever, was not a mere collector. Every moment of time he could possibly devote from his field ‘researches was employed in making finished drawings of the larva, pupa and perfect insect of every lepidopterous species, as well as of the plant upon which it fed. Those drawings are so beautifully chaste and wonderfully correct that they were coveted by every- one.” It would appear from a note in Kirby and Spence’s Introduction to Entomology {5th ed., iii., 148), that ‘the ingenious Mr. Abbot” also knew the art of inflating cater- pillar skins and dealt in them through Francillon. (See many other references in the same volume.) ‘There still exist in various places, principally in the British Museum, but also at Oxford, Paris and Zurich, and in this country, at Boston, large series of his drawings of insects and plants. Those in the British Museum are arranged in sixteen stout quarto volumes, bound in red morocco ; each volume has a printed title page and is dated 1792 to 1809, the dates, no doubt, between which they were purchased for the Museum through Francillon from Abbot, and which probably indicate the period of his activity in America. In Boston two similar volumes exist, one of which was presented by Dr. Gray of the British Museum to Dr. Gray, the botanist, of Cambridge, and by him tothe Natural History Society where it may now be seen. The other volume isa collec- tion, perhaps the only considerable one which has never passed out of this country, which was purchased by the Society from Dr. Oemler of Georgia, who inherited it from his father.* . ‘ In the title page of the last volume of the British Museum series there is a miniature portrait let into the title page which tradition says was painted by Abbot himself, and indeed it bears every mark of this, though there is no memorandum to this effect within the volume; with its peculiar physiogomy it adds considerably to onr interest in the original ; there seems to be not a little humour in the quaint features and figure, and the spare form hardly gives the figure of robust health which the face would indicate. Abbot probably returned to England about 1810, at an age of about fifty, and our portrait was doubtless painted at about this time, certainly before he left America, since it represents him in the thinnest of southern costumes. There were old persons liying in Georgia up to 1885, but since deceased, who knew him, but apparently none now remain. Abbot’s work was by no means on Lepidoptera alone, as any of the series of his drawings will show. Dr. Hagen, in speaking of the volume in the British Museum con- taining the Neuroptera, says that all the details are given with the greatest care and that in almost all cases the species can be identified. The same is the case with most of the drawings of Lepidoptera, though there is a mark of carelessness in some of the figures of early stages which is not found in others ; thisis no doubt due to the fact that so many applied for these drawings “ both in Europe and America that he found it expedient to employ one or two assistants whose copies he retouched, and, thus finished, they generally pass as his own. To an experienced eye, however, the originals of the master are readily distinguished.” ft would hardly appear that he paid more attention to Lepidoptera than to other insects. Yet in the Oemler collection alone there are one hundred and thirty-three plates of Lepidoptera, nearly every one of which figures a species distinct from the others, and ninety-four of which are accompanied by the early stages. Twenty-two of these are insects figured in Abbot and Smith’s work, but the figures of the early stages are in no case identical ; they represent the same insect, but in different attitudes. Of these one hundred and thirty-three plates, thirty-four-are concerned with the butterflies. The drawings of - butterflies in the British Museum are contained in the sixth and sixteenth volumes; the former comprising the perfect insects only, the latter the early stages as well, and in this latter series thirty-six species are figured; while the two Boston collections contain figures of the early stages of all but two of the species represented in the British Museum volume. Swainson states that a series of one hundred and three subjects of Lepidoptera, * Mr. Oemler and Mr. ‘‘ LeCompte” are both mentioned in Abbot’s notes as sending him specimens. 4 (EN.) including none published before, was executed for him “with the intention of forming two additional volumes to those edited by Dr. Smith ; but the design is now abandoned.” Each set of drawings furnished by Abbot seems to have been accompanied by more or less manuscript, in which the life history of the insect is given in a brief form, with the food plant of the caterpillar and the times of the change of the caterpillars to chrysa- lids and of chrysalids to butterflies, which shows that Abbot must have been an excep- tionally industrious rearer of insects. Indeed the transformations of not a few of our butterflies are even now known only through the observations and illustrations of Abbot. Dr. Boisduval was good enough to present me with three series of manuscript notes entitled ‘‘ Notes to the drawings of insects,” all written in Abbot’s own hand, and com- prising twenty-seven foolscap pages, rather closely written, and describing the changes of two hundred and one species ; of these thirty-eight are butterflies. These, unfortu- nately, are referred to only by number and by an English name which Abbot himself applied, apparently to every insect of which he furnished drawings, such as the “ reed butterfly,” the “ringed butterfly,” the “ lesser dingy skipper,” etc., though he occasionally makes use of such names as the “autumnal ajax,” ‘‘ Papilio antiopa,” etc., showing his familiarity to a certain extent with Linnean names. As the names and drawings are in some instances kept together, the manuscript of those in which they are not connected is still of use. It appears that nearly all the Georgian butterflies were observed and painted . by Abbot, and that of about sixty specimens which he raised he distributed illustrations and notes of the early stages to some of his correspondents. As is well knowu by all aurelians one considerable collection of Abbot’s drawings was published by Sir James Edward Smith in two sumptuous folio volumes, but these comprise, as far as the butterflies are concerned, only twenty-four species. This work made an epoch in the history of entomology in this country. Besides this Abbot pub- lished nothing. The article credited to him in Hagen’s Bibliography was by a Rev. Mr. Abbot, who wrote from England in November, 1798, when Abbot was in this country. JOHN ABBOT, THE AURELIAN. BY W. F. KIRBY, BRITISH MUSEUM, LONDON, ENGLAND. In the August part of the Canadian Entomologist, pp. 149-154, I notice an article on this subject by my friend Mr. Scudder, and I may perhaps be able to add some additional remarks. The volume on Exotic Moths, published by Duncan in Jardine’s “ Naturalists’ Library,” contains (pp. 69-71) a short account of Abbot’s life and works, and incorporates the notice by Swainson, to which Mr. Scudder refers. Swainson remarks, respecting the plates: “ M. Francillon possessed many hundreds, but we know not into whose hands they have passed.” I may say that this is evidently the set in the British Museum, as every volume bears the book-plate of ‘John Francillon.” There are seventeen volumes (not sixteen) ; the first fifteen bear the date 1792 on the printed title pages, and the two last volumes 1804 (not 1809). The contents are as follows :— Volumes 1-4—Coleoptera. 5—Orthoptera, Hemiptera, Homoptera, and Heteroptera. 6—Lepidoptera Rhopalocera. 7-11—Lepidoptera Heterocera. 12—Neuroptera, Hymenoptera. 13—Diptera. 14—Arachnida. 15—Myriopoda, Mallophaga, Acarina, Crustacea, Lepidoptera, (transfor- mations), ete. 16—Portrait, Orthoptera, Coleoptera (transformations), Lepidoptera (transformations). 17—Lepidoptera (transformations), 51 The drawings of transformations of Lepidoptera are rarely, if ever, duplicates of those published by Smith, sometimes representing a different variety of the larva of the same species; and they are nearly three times as numerous. There are only about a dozen drawings of transformations of Coleoptera. Among the lesser known orders there is little doubt that many species figured are still undescribed. I fully expect that some of Abbot’s correspondence will be discovered (of course including his autograph), perhaps at the Antipodes, for Swainson left England towards the close of his life, and died, according to Hagen, in New Zealand in 1856. I am surprised that Mr. Scudder has not mentioned the volume of Abbot’s drawings presented by Edward Doubleday to Dr. T. W. Harris. (Harris, Entomological Corre- spondence, p. 123.) If this volume is the same as that said by Mr. Scudder to have been presented by Dr. J. E. Gray to Dr. Asa Gray, some error must have arisen. Possibly it came into Dr. Asa Gray’s hands directly or indirectly from Dr. Harris, with an erroneous impression respecting the original English donor, There are a number of specimens originally collected by Abbot in the British Museum and probably in other collections. The Museum of the Royal Dublin Society (now known _as the Dublin Museum of Science and Art), contains a large series of bleached specimens of insects of various orders (Lepidoptera, Neuroptera, etc.), which were not improbably collected by Abbot (cf. some notes by Mr. McLachlan, Ent. M. Mag. X., pp. 227, 228.) Nore sy Mr. Scupper.—The small volume of paintings referred to by Mr. Kirby is in the library of the Boston Society of Natural History, and was not mentioned by me because the less said about it the better. It was picked up at a book-shop, bears the date 1830, and though Dou'leday paid seven guineas for it, it is certainly not the work of Abbot but of a very inferior copyist, some of the paintings being the merest daubs. It has scarcely the least value. The notice by Dancan 1 had not seen, but I find that it adds nothing to the facts of Abbot’s life. Hither I have never seen the seventeenth volume of Abbot’s drawings at the British Museum referred to by Mr. Kirby, or, if it concerns the moths only, may for that reason have taken no notice of it. My memo- randum of the dates must have been incorrectly copied. A CHAPTER ON THE LITERATURE OF BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS. BY A. R. GROTE, A.M. Neither Butterflies nor Moths are mentioned in the different accounts of Creation contained in the first chapters of Genesis. As the Hebrew wants a distinctive term for them they may be intended and generally included under that of “ flying things.” The eastern people had no understanding for the western rage for classifying Nature ; and the modern type of a collector “‘ coveting ” specimens and breaking the commandments to obtain them, had it been known to Bible writers, would have been doubtless held up by them to execration. ‘The earth is the Lord’s and all the things therein ;” this is the leading Semitic notion, and the Jews regarded all Nature as subordinate to the great question of religion. The Arabs followed suit and, under Mohammed, devoted them- selves to the propagation of the belief in the unity of the Deity and to a philosophy too grand to include the minute study of such trifling objects as insects. But the old heathen Greeks and the poets were attracted by the butterfly’s wings. With them they adorned the shoulders of Psyche. Love and death they winged like birds. Christianity, absorb- ing and modifying all the old heathen thoughts and customs, seems to have seen, in its earliest Roman days, a religious allegory in the life of the butterfly. To its eyes the caterpillar represented this mundane existence, the chrysalis the last sleep and the tomb, while the soaring butterfly was the soul, winging its eternal flight through heaven. During the Middle Ages people generally were too much occupied with dogmatic philosophy to pay attention to nature, but in Holland, a country which had greatly suffered under the Inquisition and the Spanish rule, at length awoke a passion for insects and for flowers. With the beginning of the sixteenth century the Swiss Conrad Gesner was born, the first naturalist who commenced the formation of a cabinet of Natural His- 52 =—— tory upon a systematic plan. His work on plants and animals appeared 1550 to 1565, but he does not seem to have written on insects. At this time the discoveries of the Dutch and Portuguese in Asia, and above all, those of the Spanish and English m America, could not fail to draw attention to the brilliant tropical butterflies, and in the seventeenth century the European museums, especially those of Amsterdam and Leyden, already con- tained collections of them, The discovery of the microscope, which, though claimed by Italy, may well be Dutch, turned the attention of naturalists to the study of insects, no less than to physiology, and the works of Malpighi, Leeuwenhoeck, Ray, Swammerdam, Reaumur, were in turn given to the world. At the beginning of the eighteenth century (1719) a Dutch woman, Madam Sibylla Merian, published an immense quarto book with plates on the insects of Surinam, especially figuring the butterflies and moths, and this work was well known to Linnaeus, and seems to have excited and inspired his entomo- mological studies, as he frequently alludes to it and cites the figures which are, however, but coarsely executed. I have named the Hawk Moth (Dilophonota Merianae), which occurs in Texas, Mexico and Cuba, after this accomplished lady and intrepid naturalist, whose travels at that early period were undertaken at much personal inconvenience, and whose enthusiasm seems to have carried her through many obstacles. I like to think that in science we owe much to the gentler sex ; it is certain that Madam Merian in her American and, much later, Frau Lienig in her Kuropean collections, gave great impetus to the study of butterflies and moths. This interest of woman in all that concerns man is only natural, and if we look around us to-day we shall see that it continues in the matter of entomology. With the middle of the eighteenth century appeared the works of the Swedish naturalist Linné, or Linnaeus, and the principles of modern nomenclature in Natural History were founded. Linné is the inventor of the system of binomial nomenclature, that system by which each species or kind of animal or plant receives a double Latin or Latinized name, the first being that of the genus to which the species belongs, the second that of the species to which the zrdividual belongs. Under the law of priority the first such name proposed in print for a species, and which is accompanied by means for its adequate identification, remains its proper specific title, although, owing to our shifting conclusions as to the limit of genera, the first of the two names, or the generic title, may become changed. In this way a durable system of nomenclature is being gradually pre- pared for all kinds of plants and animals and the command given to Adam is being practically carried out. Owing to the inability of certain writers to express themselves intelligibly, or their want of experience, some names fall by the way and are lost. The sticklers for the law of priority are at great pains to construct a hospital for these defec- tive or forgotten titles, and some confusion and guarrelling results from the effort to reinstate them in their undoubted right. But argument of some sort or another is the natural mental exercise of man, and literary disputations of this kind are among the most harmless. The thoaght which culminated in the system of Linnaeus is probably very old. The ostensible father of the philosophical view which produced it is Aristotle, who seems to have held to the opinion that each animal had always reproduced itself after its kind. The world, started after a certain fashion, remained true to the original impulse. And the Creator or Creators of the universe was God or the Deities, according as the belief in the unity or plurality of the supernatural prevailed. We have in this way a chain of naturalists frony ancient times, of which certain prominent links were Aristotle, Gesner, Linnaeus, Cuvier, Agassiz. But from quite early times another school of thought had arisen which taught that this is a world of change, and that the animals and plants of to-day are essentially different from those of former times and will in their turn give place to others in all probability ; that there has been no original creation out of nothing and that the formation of new kinds of plants and animals is the result of certain natural laws equivalent to those governing inorganic nature. The links in this chain are Democritus, Lucretius, Averroes, Oken, Lamarck, Wallace, Darwin, Spencer. Here it is not necessary to enter into the matter any further than the subject demands. For a hundred years after Linnaeus, from whose tenth edition of the Systema Nature (1758) the study of the species of butterflies and moths practically commences, Entomologists 53 | were busy in sorting and naming their material, without a thought but that they were arranging organisms patterned after the original designs of the Creator. Oken, indeed, made the statement that every insect begins its life as a worm, continues it as a crustacean and finishes it as a perfect insect, but the full significance of this progression, which can be observed in the lifetime of a single individual, was for a long time neglected. It furnished at first only material for a kind of metaphysical Natural History, in which certain fossils, standing in a certain structural relation to existing animals, were called “prophetic types,” and Biblical and figurative language was fashionably enployed to. obscure the fact of direct descent. Butterflies and moths, next perhaps to plants, have always succeeded in eliciting much attention from naturalists, and it is owing primarily to his study of them that the English entomologist, Wallace, then (February, 1855) col- lecting in Borneo, wrote his celebrated article on the law regulating the introduction of new species. This paper endeavored to show that every species has come into existence coincident both in time and space with a pre-existing closely allied species. In further communications Mr. Wallace explained the protective resemblances between animals on the theory of mimicry, and everywhere throughout his valuable contributions butterflies and moths illustrate his remarks and suggest his ideas. Afterwards Mr. Darwin’s cele- -brated book fully and completely showed the action of the law of; Natural Selection throughout organic nature, and here also many important results are drawn from studies of the Lepidoptera. The study of the literature of butterflies and moths since 1758 is necessary to the student who is emulous of describing new species or adding to our stock of information. A brief sketch of that branch which treats of the moths of North America may therefore Fie. 26. be given here. The descriptional works of Linnzus were followed in England by the publication of the illustrated works of Drury (1773), in which good figures of a number of our species are given, all of which are, I believe, recognized, and the names taken into our lists. As his species are all redescribed and figured in modern literature, his original 54 work has lost much interest. Among the waste of public money for scientific purposes I may mention the fact that the volume in the Natural History of New York, published by the State, contains actual copies (and poor ones) of Drury’s old figures, without acknowledg- ment and this while the originals were flying about in the country all round the capital at Albany. While Drury was publishing his work in England, on the continent Fabricius, who followed very closely in Linnzus’s footsteps, issued several descriptional works on insects and in them are the descriptions of a number of our North American moths. Naturally our larger and gaudier species were the ones to be first described. Linné had named our “‘ American Moon Moth” or “ Queen of the Night,” Actias Luna * (Fig. 26), as also the ‘‘ American Emperor” on “Cecropia Moth,” Platysamia Cecropia Hic. 27. (Fig. 27). So far as the titles themselves are concerned, their choice depends on the fancy of the describer, and while Latin adjectives expressive of some characteristic marking or designating the country or the food plant were generally used, names out of Homer and the Classics were brought into fashion by Linnzus’s example. Dr. Harris introduced a new feature into our nomenclature, by using the names of Indian chiefs for our Hesperide. The name used for a species soon loses its signification apart from the object it designates. Respecting the name Cecropia, Dr. Harris says, on page 279 of the first edition of his book on the Insects of Massachusetts, that this was the ancient name of the city of Athens, and thinks it here inappropriately applied toa moth. But the late Dr. Fitch has written in his copy of Dr. Harris’s work, now in my library, “ Cecrops was the first king of Athens—Cecropia is the feminine of Cecrops—and thus implies the first queen of the most polished or fairest people, so a more appropriate and beautiful designa- tion could not have been found for this most gaudy sumptuous moth.” So far Dr. Fitch, It may be said that the multitude of species renders it difficult to find different and oppo- site names. I may close these remarks on the names of insects by referring to a very valuable paper on “ Entomological Nomenclature,” by the late Dr. Leconte, and published in the sixth volume of the Canadian Entomologist, pp. 201 and following. For his ’ 55 observations Dr. Leconte has chosen a motto out of Goethe: Im Ganzen-haltet euch an Worte/ The doctor advises Entomologists to disregard the advice of the devil given in this motto. ‘* Use words only to acquire and convey accurately your knowledge of things ; but never believe that the word is superior to the thing which it represents. -Thus will you avoid (mere) scholasticism, one of the great abysses of thought into which the seeker after truth is liable to fall.” The doctor concludes his essay by the statement that descrip- tive natural history is the lowest and most routine work that a man of science has to perform, and that to aim at distinction by having one’s name printed in connection with a weed, a bug or a bone is an ignoble ambition ; and this is certainly a sound view of the case. In addition, if one’s name happens to be a very common one the identity is addi- tionally obscured when the name appears after a Latin title of a species. To resume our review of the older authors: Fabricius (1775) was the first to describe the ‘ Royal Walnut Moth,” probably our finest spinner. One or two of his descriptions have not ‘been identified, such as his Bombyx Americana, Pyralis Lactana, Tinea Sepulcrella ; -and this is the case also with Linné’s Phaleena Omicron. _ The next work of importance to the American student is that of Cramer, a Dutch Entomologist whose volumes (1779 to 1782) contain a great quantity of coloured figures without any systematic arrangement and for the most part coarsely executed. Cramer figures and names for the first time several of our Hawk Moths, such as the species of the genus Lveryx, Cherilus and Myron, the larve of which feed on azaleas, grapevines -and the Virginia Creeper. Both Cramer and Drury figure our North American species only incidentally, with other so-called exotic material. But in 1779 appeared the large folio work in two volumes by Abbot and Smith exclusively on the Lepidoptera of Georgia, which geographical name then covered a larger area of North America than at present. ‘The materials for this work were the collections, coloured drawings and observations of Abbot, an English schoolmaster residing in Georgia, and thus the South became histori- ‘cally the scene of the earliest studies of our butterflies and moths. Afterwards Major Leconte continued Abbot’s work in the same field, publishing upon the butterilies together with the French Lepidopterist, Dr. Boisduval. Abbot’s original drawings, which I have had the opportunity of examining in the British Museum, are much better than the published plates, which nevertheless are superior to anything issued before that time, if we except certain figures by Dutch Entomologists of European species. Abbot gives us the species in the three stages of caterpillar, chrysalis and perfect insect, together with the food plant. The text, in English and French, is, however, totally, or almost valueless, if intended to supplement the drawings and render the identification of the species certain. Some of the species cannot yet be satisfactorily made out, while it seems probable that in two instances, Catocala amasia and Homoptera calycanthata, Abbot has given two dis- ‘tinct species as the sexes of one and the same form. In 1874 I rediscovered the Phalena Chionanthi of Abbot and Smith, in a collection of Noctuide sent me from Ithaca, N.Y., by Professor Comstock, of Cornell University. This species had not been even again alluded to in print, so far as I was able to ascertain, since 1797, a long space of time, and had I been less familiar with the literature of our moths I should have fallen into the error of redescribing it. The Phalena Chionanthi of Abbot and Smith is now the Adita Chionanthi of our lists ; the moth being one of the Noctwide and affording a new generic type allied to the genus Agrotis. Abbot’s unpublished drawings contain repre- ‘sentations of several species subsequently described, and were probably not issued because only the perfect stages are represented. Among these drawings is one of the rare Citheronia sepulcralis, Grote and Robinson, our second species congeneric with the Royal Walnut Moth collected plentifully by Mr. Koebele in Florida. The species of Abbot’s, which I have not been able satisfactorily to identify, are Aceris, Hastulifera and Caly- canthata among the Noctuidae, while I originally showed that his Vidua is not the species - described afterwards by Guenée under this name, altered to Viduata in the supplement to the last volume on the Noctwide in the “Species Géneral.” I will here state that I am of opinion that we should reject the name of Viduata, altogether, because this is only a:slight alteration of Abbot’s name and is intended to apply to Abbot’s species by Guenée. Now, in my original essay I showed that Guenée’s species was not Abbot’s but Desperata, very probably. Acceptlng this we must use a new name for Vidua and Viduata of Se ee Guenée, an insect I have fully described in Proc. Ent. Soc. Philadelphia, 1872. I shall call this stouter species C. Gueneana, and call the C. Desperata of Guenée and our collec- tions C. Vidua of Abbot and Smith. Resemblances to European forms led Abbot into some mistakes, which have probably not been adeqnately corrected by Dr. Harris, but wait full collections from the South and detailed comparisons in all stages with the ailied forms. Abbot and Smith’s has been long our most important work on our butterflies and moths, small as is the number of species illustrated. This arises from the fact that all stages of the insects are given, and it has become in this respect a model of what an illustrated work on the Lepidoptera should be. It is only recently excelled by the- magnificent volumes of Mr. W. H. Edwards on our butterflies. Among our larger and interesting moths first figured by Abbot are the Blind Hawk, Paonias excmcatus ; the Brown Eyed Hawk, Calasymbolus myops: the Walnut Hawk, Cressonia juglandis ; the- Laurel Hawk, Sphinx kalmie, (Fig. 28.) Fic. 28. After Abbot, the most important work is that of Jacob Hubner, a German naturalist. of Augsburg, who has published a number of works on the Lepidoptera, splendidly illustrating a very large number of species. Scattered in other books on Lepidoptera issued at the close of the last, and beginning of the present century, may be found single North American species. Has are, for fatance the works of Stoll, De Beauvais, and Esper. MHiibner’s principal works are, the “Sammlung” and the “ Zutraege.” The- ‘‘Sammlung” bears the dates 1806 to 1825; but it seems certain that a few plates were- issued at various dates of the last volume, by Geyer, up to 1837, after Hiibner’s death. According to a written statement given me by Dr. Herrich-Scheffer, a literary successor of Hiibner, and owner of the original plates, these posthumous plates did not include any of the North American species issued by Hiibner, and afterwards re-named by Dr. Harris, but I do not feel certain that this statement was complete. It is only so far as these few species are concerned, that the question has any practical bearing for us. Hiibner figures four of our hawk moths Sphinx chersis, Ceratomia amyntor, Philampelus pan- dorus, and Phlegethontius celeus. Dr. Harris erroneously describes Pandorus under the name Satellitia of Linné, which is a West Indian species distinct from ours; and Celeus under the name of Carolina of Linné, a different species ; and gives new names to the two first. But as Dr. Harris re-describes several other species of Hiibner, and, in fact, does not allude to Hiibner at all, I agree with Dr. Morris, that Hubner’s were not then known to him ; as authority for the genus Xyleutes, Harris quotes Newman, not Hiibner. It is evident that Hubner’s names for these hawk moths have priority, and they are . accordingly preferred in our lists. So far as the names are concerned, Geyer retained the names for the species proposed by Hiibner, as he tells us in the Zutraege, and as to the plates of the Sammlung, he evidently only finished and issued those already determined for publication by Hiibner, whose name alone appears as the author of the Sammlung. It is probable, and indeed certain, that the plate of Aymntor was really issued not later than 1837, the latest date given by Dr. Herrich-Scheffer; Dr. Hagen makes it 1838, which in any event ante-dates Harris. That Dr. Harris only gradually beeame acquainted with the 57 older authors, is evident from his having at one time re-named Calasymbolus astyius, as S. integerrima ; so that Harris’s synonyms in the Sphingide are rather numerous. Dr. Hagen’s argument that Dr. Harris knew Hiibner, and rose superior to his illustrations, deliberately, as it were, re-naming his species is a very remarkable one. [I do not see any reason why a similar argument might not be used as against other authors whom Dr. Harris ignores. I believe that Dr. Harris would have been only too glad to have availed himself of Hiibner’s accurate determinations had he known of their existence. I conclude, therefore, that Dr. Morris is perfectly right in his remarks in a foot-note to J. inclusa, in Flint’s edition, and that Dr. Hagen is wrong. It takes time to prepare and issue a volume of copper-plates, while a brief description can be written and printed very quickly. It is true that Dr. Hagen endeavours to throw doubts upon this decision, but equally so, that he does so from prejudice against Hiibner, as I shall show. Besides these two illustrated works, Hiibner issued a sheet called the ‘“‘Tentamen,” probably in 1803, in which he simply proposed a number of new genera for European moths, giving no description, and merely citing the type by its scientific name. He then commenced the issue of his ‘‘ Verzeichniss,” in 1816 ; in this, he endeavored to arrange the Lepidoptera of the whole world in a large number of genera, the diagnoses of which are very brief and usually unsatisfactory. To understand the importance of these works, we must go back a little. Linneeus arranged the whole Lepidoptera under the “Genera” Papilio, Sphinz, Bombyx, Noctua, Geometra, Pyralis, Tortrix, Tinea ; which now are considered as types of “families.” Fabricius increased these genera by several, such as Zygena and Hesperia ; Latreille added, Callimorpha, etc., but the modern idea of a genus is antici- pated first by Hiibner. Unfortunately Hiibner took no pains to give structural features, or to properly limit his genera. Colour and pattern were used by him in his scant defini- tions, instead of real form of parts, and while the number of his genera is excessive, the species are quite often unhappily associated. On theother hand, Hiibner in important points showed himself ahead of his time. He correctly divided the Hesperide into two groups. He is the first to associate the genera Bombycia and Thyatira, and after all is said and done, his arrangement of the whole sub-order shows that he must have made continuous studies to suggest so much that is permanently valuable. In Europe, the successors of Ochsenheimer and the Viennese school of Lepidopterists which had flourished since the “Wiener Verzeichniss,” neglected Hubner and misapplied his terms. From this neglect arose of late years the attempt to restore Hubner’s terms to their undoubted right, and this attempt met with a somewhat violent opposition in certain quarters. It is an easy task to overhaul and criticise these works of Hiibner, and the style in which it was per- formed by Mr. W. H. Edwards in the pages of the Canadian Entomologist, leaves little to be desired in the way of abuse. But unwilling to stand alone in the matter, Mr. Edwards enlisted the aid of Dr. Hagen, and the plan was brought into execution by which Hiibner should be ruled out altogether. It was to show that Ochsenheimer, Hiibner’s contemporary, and a Jeading authority, simply ignored Hiibner’s genera, and that Hiibner himself attached no importance to his Tentamen. To do this, Dr. Hagen trans- lated a sentence out of Ochsenheimer, and by ingeniously inserting a full stop, changed its meaning. ‘“ This sheet (the Tentamen) I saw long after the printing of my third volume was done,” writes Ochsenheimer, and here, Mr. Edwards following Dr. Hagen, inserts the stop. But Ochsenheimer in reality goes on withont any stop ;” therefore I could not earlier have adopted anything out of it.” And Ochsenheimer did adopt Hiibner’s genera out of the Tentamen in his fourth volume, such as Cosmia, Xylena, Agrotis, Graphiphora, etc., and where he cites them in the synonymy, as Heliophila, we have no ground for the procedure, since Ochsenheimer’s own genera have also no diagnoses. Dr. Hagen additionally gives us 1816 instead of 1810 for the date of Ochsenheimer’s third volume, apparently to spin out the time since the issue of the Tentamen ; the exact date of the latter being in some doubt. Frofa 1802 to 1806, various dates have been given to it, while probably it was printed in 1803. In Europe, of late years, Hiibner’s genera, such as could be used, have been adopted, and while I am of opinion that no changes should be lightly made in our existing nomenclature on account of a generic title proposed by Hiibner and that a large number of Hiibner’s generic titles must be dropped 58 for good, I believe it to be impossible to reject Hiibner altogether, as it would necessitate too much fresh naming and work. It is evident that we are practically near the solution of the whole question, and that having taken out of Hiibner what we can fairly use, we shall drop him and further quarrelling on the subject. The controversy has been, how- ever, an interesting one, as illustrating literary vehemence. ; After Hiibner, the work of Kirby on Canadian insects in the Fauna Amer. Borealis, merits our attention, This author describes and figures the rare Smerinthus Cerisyi and Alypia MacCullochit (Fig. 29). I have not. been able, however, to identify his Sesia rujicaudis ; the supposition that it is Hemaris uniformis is contradicted by the description. Other North American moths described by Kirby and not since positively made out are Deilephila intermedia and the species of Plusia, while his Arctia parthenice has been identified as a variety of the common Arctia ; virgo, a species which Kirby does not seem to have known as he Fic. 29. does not allude to it. Kirby’s descriptions have been reprinted in the Canadian Entomologist, and we can now pass briefly in review the works written and published in America itself upon our butterflies and moths up to the year 1858, the first hundred years after Linnzus. The first author whose works have left an indelible impression upon the science of entomology in America is Dr. Harris, who resided for the time in Cambridge and was librarian of Harvard University. An original copy of his published writings is before me, with notes in his hand, and some comments by the late Dr. Fitch, from whose library the book came into my possession. The importance of Dr. Harris’s work is not measured only by the amount of information on North American entomology gathered by him ; it is the general useful direction which his enquiries take and which is to be the model of future work in America in the same field. Dr. Harris is the first of the State Ento- mologists, a body of scientific men who are naturally to accomplish much practical good in a country whose wealth so largely depends upon agriculture. The first part of Dr. Harris’s “‘ Report on the habits of insects injurious to vegetation in Massachusetts ” was - submitted to the Senate and House of Representatives of the State by Edward Everett, on the 19th of April, 1838. Previous to this, some lists had appeared but no description of species. His “ Descriptive Catalogue of the North American Insects belonging to the Linnean Genus Sphinx in the cabinet of Thaddeus William Harris, M.D.,” appeared in the pages of Silliman’s Journal, No. 2, Vol. 36, in the ensuing year (1839.) There is, then, no doubt that the plates of Hiibner mentioned above have priority over the descrip- tions of Dr. Harris, who can very well afford to lose the few species considering the greater importance of his total work, as such a course, from the conscientious regard for priority displayed in his writings, would have also pleased him best. I have elsewhere written at some length upon Dr. Harris’s Report. It has become classical upon its sub- ject, going over the whole range of our noxious insects as then known. I need refer here only to that portion which treats of the Lepidoptera, or butterflies and moths. Under the heading of ‘Insects injurious to Vegetation” we might arrange nearly the whole of our Lepidoptera, since the larve almost all feed upon plants. The excep- tions to this rule are the bee moths, probably imported species of Galeria which feed upon wax, and two species of Phycidae, Euzephora coccidivora and £. pallida, described by Prof. Comstock, and which devour plant lice instead of plants, as caterpillars. There is also some evidence that the Tineid, Huclemensia bassettella, is also predaceous in its habits. A good many species of moths, however, become of great economic importance from their feeding upon cultivated plants, and it is these primarily that have become the subject of investigation on the part of the State and general Government, and which work in the United States has arrived at dimensions unknown in Europe. It is a known fact in Europe that the efforts at keeping down the numbers of certain noxious species of Lepi- doptera have been, in certain localities, effective. For instance, the White Tree Butter- fly, Aporia crataegi, no longer appears in such swarms as formerly, and this is attributable to the systematic way in which the nests of the caterpillar have been broken up and destroyed in France and Germany. On the other hand, swarms of the Cabbage Butterfly and several sorts of injurious moths still recur at irregular intervals. This swarming of 59 & noxious species seems often to depend upon some interference with the usual natural checks in the shape of parasites, or to the prevalence of suitable weather to the develop- ment and increase of the broods. When we cultivate cereals or any plant of economic value we, in effect, afford an abundance of good and appropriate food for the insects which habitually live upon it. It will be recollected that the maple and other shade trees in Brooklyn and New York used to be completely defoliated by the middle of summer by the common Brown Drop or Measuring Worm, Ludalimia subsignaria. The European sparrow rid the cities of this nuisance completely ; it cleaned them all out. Recent examinations of the stomachs of this bird in Europe prove that, although it eats also grain or farinaceous food, over fifty per cent. of its food is animal, chiefly the larve of insects. But other writers make, from experiment, the percentage less, and I do not feel certain that the introduction of the sparrow is defensible on the ground that it is a strictly useful bird on all occasions. But few things, animals or man himself, are always a prac- tical success and on all occasions. Except as against this Brown Measvring Worm New York could have got along without the help of the sparrows. A common pest in the east is the hairy larva (Fig. 30) of the Vapourer Moth, Orgyia leucostigma (Fig. 31), which, owing, perhaps, to its long hair-pencils used in making its cocoon, is less readily eaten by sparrows or other birds. The true remedy for the Vapourer is the sweeping down of the egg masses laid out- side of the cocoon by the wingless female. (Fig. 32 represents a, the wingless female and the mass of eggs laid on the outside of the cocoon; 6, a young larva suspended by its silken thread; c, the female chrysalis, and d that of the male.) With industry and care there need never be any trouble from this insect, and a small sum of money would rid all cities in a short time of this pest, were the cleaning of the city Fie. 32. undertaken at the proper moment. Other species occasionally increase largely in certain seasons from unknown causes. On Mount Desert one season I saw myriads of the Pretty Pine Spanner, Cleora pulchraria, which is not usually so plentiful. The several species of pine, native and imported, become infested by the Pine Pest, Pinipestis zimmermant, a small pyralid, the larva of which seems to have but one annual brood, feeding beneath the bark, causing the gum to exude and deforming the tree by swellings. This insect is widely spread over the Middle States. Now it is evi- dent that we can only diminish effectively the numbers and the damage caused by 60 these and other sorts of insects when their whole history is completely known. Then» and then only, inasmuch as each species has its peculiar habits and ways of living: can we propose rational means for their abatement. This is perfectly clear, as also that experiments as to the means to be employed for the abatement of any one species are a perfectly legitimate matter for Governmental expense. Still, the fact remains that we can do but little, practically, to check the ravages of certain of our insect enemies. Many appear suddenly and again disappear before remedies can be efficiently employed. For the abating of many kinds we can only wait the action of their natural enemies. My experience leads me to this one conclusion, that mechanical means for the abatement of any insect injurious to vegetation are, asarule and with some proper exceptions, preferable to the employmeut of poisons. Before the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in 1879, I read a paper showing that the damages resulting from the employment of Paris. Green and arsenical poisons outweighed the penefits, pecuniarily in the death of stock, while accidents to persons had become not unfrequent from its unlicensed use. This protest has, I believe, borne some fruit. I am also of opinion that more good would be brought about by including an elementary course of entomology, teaching the life history of our commoner and destructive insects, in the Public Schools, especially throughout the agri- cultural districts, than by the present system of publishing reports which do not sufficiently reach the farmers who pay for them. It should be the duty of the State Entomologists to lecture in the Public Schools. If an easy text book were published, and an effort made to have it introduced, good results would be soon obtained. Farmers’ boys would learn to destroy the nests of the tent caterpillar rather than of the robin. The protection of birds and, in fact, all natural enemies of our predaceous insects is a main feature of the whole matter. I may here refer to the Cotton Worm, Aletia argillacea. This species belongs to the class of migratory pests. I have shown that it was probably introduced during the last century from the West Indian Islands where cotton was cultivated. That, in common with many other moths, it has a seasonal migration from south to north, and that its foothold and multiplication on the soil of the United. States was dependent on the introduction | and cultivation of the cotton plant. I was the first to show its full habits : that it hiber- nated as a moth and that there was a geographical, climatic limit to its successful hiber- nation. In other words, the moth, even within the cotton belt where I made my first studies, did not survive the winter to lay fresh eggs on the young cotton of the ensuing year, and that the new worms came from a fresh immigration of the moth from points farther south. I can see no reason for any change in my general views on the whole matter of the Cotton Worm. I could not, asa private individual, journey over the whole South and find out the line of successful hibernation. That such a line exists somewhere is the whole gist of my paper. Beforg I read it, it was not known that Aletia hibernated as a moth, it was not known that it did not breed everywhere the ensuing year from eggs. laid by the progeny of the year before. The main question, so far as I can see, still remains where [I left it. The white Maple Spanner, Zudalimia subsignaria of Hiibner, used to be so common in Brooklyn and New York, from 1855 until well into the sixties, that the shade trees of all kinds except the Ailanthus, became completely defoliated. I remember especially one poor tree at the old Nassau Street post office in New York which became as bare as in winter by the middle of June, and struggled with a stunted ‘after-growth of leaves in July. Everywhere the brown Measuring Worms used to hang down and cover the side- walks in New York and suburbs to the great discomfort of the passers by. I have seen ladies come into the house with as many as a dozen of the worms on their skirts or looping over their dresses. The advent of the English sparrow changed all this; the naked brown larve of the Maple Spanner disappeared before them and gradually all the other naked larvze became scarce. Such were for instance the larvee of Hudryas, Alypia,’ Thyreus Abbottii, Deidamia inscripta, Everyx myron, Chamyris cerinthia, etc., all of which I used to find abundant in the small gardens in Brooklyn, chiefly feeding on the grapevines. The larve of the Vapourer, Orgyia Leucostigma, being hairy and less palatable to the sparrows, however, remained and multiplied ; becoming, in Philadelphia, as great 61 a nuisance as the Maple Spanner had been, which with the assistance of the sparrow it had replaced, It is, therefore, evident from the foregoing digression upon injurious insects, that the study of entomology has a practical side, and that this practical side has attained a great development in the United States and Canada, from the fact that these are mainly agricultural countries, whose wealth is in the products of their soil, as in Europe is particularly the case with France. Therefore it is that Dr. Harris’s Report is of such importance, and that it made much more impression than the writings of Thomas Say, who described so many more species and whose American Entomology preceded it in point of time. Say described but very few Lepidoptera, but these few are among our most interesting insects. Smerinthus geminatus, the twin-eyed hawk, is the only moth named by him, if we except that in a letter, posthumously published, he described the «Cotton Worm Moth” under the specific title of Xylina. With the publication of Dr. Harris’s report and other papers, commenced the active study of our butterflies and moths in New England and the North. Abbot’s observations had been made, compara- tively speaking, in a wilderness, and were, besides, published in Europe, where, in the infancy of ‘our literature, works on North America would naturally be printed. But, in 1840, things were very different. An American literature was already born and well born and the study of Natural History, which [ have in another work shown to be the strength of the Indo-Germanic race, had already eminent students with us in its several branches. Louis Agassiz had come to live in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and the enthu- siasm consequent upon his lectures was soon to bear an abundant harvest of results. Dr. Harris prepared a report on the insects collected by Agassiz in his memcrable trip to the Lake Superior region, and the book in which it found its place has now become a very rare one. In his report Dr. Harris had described an Eastern species of Hepialus under the name of dArgenteomaculatus, a species of which I have examined specimens collected in the Katskill Mountains by Mr. Meade. During this Lake Superior trip, a species of Hepialus was collected which Dr. Harris figures and identifies with the Eastern, though noting the difference in color and markings. I believe this to be the first notice of a distinct species which I also have received from the Lake Superior region, the wings more pinkish or salmon color, the spots smaller, the whole insect larger, and which I have described in the third volume of the proceedings of the Entomological Society of Phila- delphia, p. 73, pl. I, fig. 6, as H. qguadriguttatus. Not only, then, is it the matter, it is also the manner of Dr. Harris’s Report, which makes it still a readable book, although so much that it contains is superseded by better and fuller information. His excellent English, staid, unflippant style, absence of self- assertion and spirit of cultivated observation constitute the principal charms of the Report and redeem it from the dryness which such books must have for the reader. His memory will always make Cambridge interesting ground for the student, even when associations of this kind with the past are becoming laxer and a very different style is employed in entomological reports. Dr. Harris was more of a general entomologist than a specialist, and his work in the different suborders of insects is everywhere of the same character and bears much the same value. In his philosophy he seems to have held to the tradition of Kirby and Spence. In this connection it is worth while, if no more than as a reminder of views once prevailing, to give his reasons for the study of insects: “Surely insects, the most despised of God’s creation, are not unworthy our study, since they are the object of His care and subjects of a special providence.” He has a kindly courtesy for the opinions of others. In recording a contradictory statement by Miss Morris as to the habits of the Hessian fly, he says: “If, therefore, the observations of - Miss Morris are found to be equally correct, they will serve to show, still more than the foregoing history, how variable and extraordinary is the economy of this insect,” ete. One contrasts this involuntarily with language we sometimes see used under similar circumstances. Such adjectives as “erroneous,” “incorrect,” “ unreliable,” “ vicious,” etc., are foreign to Dr. Harris and his report is the gainer from this fact. I have passed .some happy hours wandering beneath the Cambridge elms and conjuring up the kindly figure of this entomologist of an olden time. The example of the State of Massachusetts was followed by New York, and.Dr. Asa 62 Fitch shortly after commenced the publication of yearly reports on injurious insects. So far as the butterflies and moths are concerned, these reports are much less interesting to the student than Dr. Harris’s; although the descriptions of the species are longer, they are also clumsier, and the literary resources of Dr. Harris in Cambridge and Boston were probably wanting to Dr. Fitch. In these New York reports we have the first descriptions of Prionoxystus querciperda, Tolype laricis and Rhododipsa volupia. The species of Volaphana are described as Tortricide and Hiibner’s Pangrapta decoralis figures as Hypena elegantalis. There is everywhere great pains taken to be exact and explicit, and so far as many noxious species are concerned much valuable observation is brought together. In making an index to these reports Dr. Fitch’s successor, Prof. James A. Lintner, has performed an acceptable work. With the year 1857, the late Dr. Brackenridge Clemens commenced the publication of descriptions of North American moths. His synopsis of the Sphingide (1858) is characterized by great care in describing the species and genera, but the main defect of the work is the absence of independent literary research, the synonymy being taken from the British Museum lists of Mr. Walker. Dr. Clemens describes for the first time the rare Sphinx luscitiosa, the genera Deidamia and Eilema, and includes* the West. Indian forms, some of which have been more recently found in South Florida. A “«Synonymical Catalogue of the Sphingide” was published in 1865 by the late Coleman T. Robinson and myself, in which Hemaris gracilis, Huproserpinus pheton and the genera Cressonia and Diludia were described, the literature of the group being thoroughly gone over since 1758, and henceforward the nomenclature of this family at least, takes on a more permanent shape» It is one hundred years from Linnzus to Dr. Clemens, but in North America, in 1858, there were but very few species of moths then named in collections either public or private. Commencing to publish my own studies with the beginning of the year 1862, I can say truthfully that there were then probably not one hundred species named and determined in any collection. The principal difficulty lay in ascertaining what had been described in Europe. For this purpose Mr. Robinson and I made one trip to England and France, and afterwards another was made by myself. ~ The results of the examinations of Mr. Walker’s and M. Guenee’s types were published and material was determined by us from all parts of the county, in collections both public and private. There are now (1888) probably more than five thousand species of moths described from North America, and this result is due to the large and increasing number of students, and the facilities offered by serial publications, the most reliable of which has been the Canadian Entomologist, which has survived many similar undertakings, Each family of moths has enjoyed the attention of one prominent specialist, thus Dr. Packard has studied the Spanners, Geometride ; Mr. Hy. Edwards the Clearwings, Sessiide ; Mr. R. H. Stretch the Spinners, Bombycide ; Prof. O. H. Fernald the Leaf Rollers, Zortricide ; my own studies having been principally on the Owlet Moths, Noctwide ; the Sparklers, Pyralide, and the Hawk Moths, Sphingide. Very soon we shall know all about our moths and popularly written works wilh supersede the stiff and formal descriptive sources for our information which now exists. May we all be kindly remembered and our faults forgiven by the coming generation, who will catch our species and discuss our, no doubt, often defective views based upon the scantier information now at our disposal. Of some of my contemporaries I confess I would like to say a word here, but I may not. I wouid like to recall the long ago when Mr. Saunders, with his kind and thoughtful and then youthful face, came to see me in New York; when Packard, on his way to “the front” during the war, called upon me in Brooklyn; when Mr. Tepper and Mr Graef before that, collected and discussed these “little beauties” with me. And then I remember Mr. Calverley, who was very old and very good to me, and Mr. Harvey J. Rich, who died so young. In Brooklyn there are now a number of new writers, among whom my new friend, the Rev. Mr. Hulst, is working steadily and cheerfully along. But now I must think of my good friend Coleman T. Robinson, who was killed by being thrown from his carriage. An accident, equally deplorable, deprived us of Mr. . Walsh. I remind me also well of Mr. Angus, of West Farms, a tall Scotchman with curious, white and black in bunches, parti-colored hair, very intelligent, kindly but 63 reserved. I wonder how long ago it is since I first met Mr. Lintner, or Dr. Morris? It seems ages and ages. And Dr. Bailey is dead and J. D. Putnam. Well, well, ’tis no use to moralize. My boyhood’s friend I will remember here. It was old Dr. Kennicott, of Illinois, the father of that brave and hardworking naturalist, Robert A. Kennicott. The old doctor’s letters to me | treasure still. I never saw him. He wrote to me regularly, at least about twice a month, for several years. He was to me the best man that ever lived. He really taught me, although he never gave mea lesson. I used to sit in my little entomological room, a boy of fifteen, with his photograph on the table before me, for hours together, reading his letters. I have never forgotten him. He lives with me still and all the time. He was a man that must have made a great many people very happy, and that is to be the truest friend and the best man of us all. The story of the growth of our literature is the individual story of each one who has contributed in any way to its augmentation. Having worked so long it is natural that many should have come to me. Very few stayed away. Even Mr. Strecker, for one brief night, consulted me and believed. He fell by the wayside, though, before he got home. He came, with his boxes, to meet me in Philadelphia, I think, early in 1873. In Philadelphia, Cresson was the leading spirit and founded the little sheet “The Practical Entomologist,” which I edited for the first few numbers. Those were the days before the large ‘‘appropriations” of latter years. We took the field against the noxious species at our own expense. I am also in the first of Prof. Riley’s Missouri reports. When I was in Buffalo many visited me ; but, of all, it was Prof. Fernald who brought me most happiness. When he came to be my scholar, I knew I should quickly come to learn of him; and now he is teaching me a lot about the Sphingide, my own par- “ticular subject! As I think of the many lepidopterists I have met and corresponded with, I feel sure that the future of the science with us is beyond question and that there is really no necessity for my putting pen to paper again. I do not intend, however, to be killed off. If, like the Prince of Bulgaria, I must go, I will go with a voluntary air and in a decent manner, not be bustled out of my dominions by a conspiracy. REMEDIES FOR NOXIOUS INSECTS. BY REV. C. J. 8. BETHUNE, PORT HOPE. In our Annual Reports for the last two years (1886, pages 55-64; 1887, pages 51-59), I have given some account of the remedies that have been found most practically useful in checking the attacks of noxious insects upon various plants and crops. I have taken up the insects in the alphabetical order of their common names, and left off last year with “The Fall Web-worm.” JI now propose to go on with the list of our commonest insect enemies and give the remedies that have proved most effective, and in doing this I shall of course quote very freely from the experience of the most skilled practical entomo- logists, both in the United States and Canada, in order to furnish our readers with the best information that can be obtained on the subject. The next insect on our list is THE GoosEBERRY FRuit-worm (Dakruma convolutella, Hubn.). Besides the caterpillars and saw-fly worms which destroy the foliage of the goose- berry and often strip the branches entirely of their leaves, and which have already been referred to under the heading of Currant insects, there is another insect trouble which frequently causes the gardener much annoyance. When the fruit is partially grown, ; many of the berries are often observed to have become discoloured; some turn toa dull whitish colour, and some shrivel up, while 7 others, more advanced, seem to ripen prematurely ; in either case they soon drop from the branches to the ground. On inspection it is found that nearly every berry contains a small, pale worm, Fie. 33. which is engaged in devouring the pulp of the fruit. This worm is the larva of a little pale gray moth (Fig. 33), which appears about the end of April 64 or early in May, and lays its eggs on the young gooseberries soon after they are formed. The eggs soon hatch and the tiny caterpillars burrow into the fruit, where they remain in safe concealment. When they have grown considerably they fasten two or more berries together with silken threads, sometimes biting off the stems in order to bring them more easily into the required position, and here they live securely with plenty of food convenient. This tying of the fruit together is more frequently done in the case of the wild gooseberry and the currant, which it also attacks, and whose berries are not large enough to contain the worm. When fully grown the caterpillar lowers itself to the earth by a silken thread, and there spins its cocoon (Fig. 33) among leaves or rubbish on the surface of the ground. In this state it lives all winter, the moth appearing, as already stated, the following spring. ' The most obvious remedies for this pest are (1) picking off by hand all prematurely ripened or discoloured fruit and burning or otherwise destroying them. As, however, the worms are very active and quickly make their escape to the ground when disturbed, a close watch should be kept in order to trample under foot any that may get away. (2) Clearing up and burning all fallen leaves and other rubbish beneath the infested bushes, after the fruit season is over, and in this way destroying the insect in its chry- salis state. It is also recommended to dust the bushes freely with air-slacked lime early in the spring, renewing the application from time to time as may be necessary, the object being to prevent the moth from laying her eggs on the young fruit. Tue GooseBerRY Miner (Cecidomyia grossularie, Fitch) Ts another enemy to the fruit of the gooseberry. Its presence may be ascertained, as in the case of the previous insect, by the premature ripening or discoloration of the berries. It isa very tiny maggot, of a bright yellow colour and closely resembling the wheat- midge. It lives within the fruit both in its larval and pupal states, and the minute two- winged fly comes out about the end of July. How the species is perpetuated from one season to another is not yet fully known, but it is supposed that there is another brood in- some later fruit or other suitable substance, and that in this way the insect is carried over the winter. The same remedies may be employed as those given for the fruit-worm, care being taken to destroy the fallen gooseberries early in July, before the fly has had time to complete its transformations. Tue GrRApE-VINE Lear-HoppPeR (Lrythroneura vitis, Harris). This little insect, popularly called ‘‘ The Thrips,” often proves very injurious to the vine. The thin-leaved varieties, such as the Clinton and Delaware, suffer much more severely from it than those with thick leathery foliage. We have seen a small vineyard of Clinton grapes almost entirely defoliated before the end of the summer by the attacks of this tiny enemy, with the result, of cours?, that the fruit failed to mature and became simply worthless. The insect, of which there are several species known, belongs to the true bugs (Hemiptera), and like the rest of its order, lives by sucking the juices of plants. The accompanying illustration (Fig. 34) represents the perfect insect, greatly magnified ; the natural size is shown by the short lines to the left of each figure, one representing the insect with wings expanded ready for flight; the other with the wings closed. The different species ’ vary in colour and markings, but the one shewn here is dusky and red, with pale stripes. “ These insects—to quote Saunders’s Insects Fic. 34. Injurious to Fruit—pass the winter in the per- fect state, hibernating under dead leaves or other rubbish, the survivors becoming active 65 in spring, when they deposit their eggs on the young leaves of the vine. The larve are hatched during the month of June, and resemble the perfect insect, except in size and in being destitute of wings. During their growth they shed their skins, which are nearly white, several times, and although exceedingly delicate and gossamer-like, the empty skins remain for some time attached to the leaves. The insects feed together on the under side of the leaves, and are very quick in their movements, hopping briskly about by means of the hind legs, which are especially fitted for this purpose. They havea peculiar habit of running sideways, and when they see that they are observed on one side of a leaf they will often dodge quickly around to the other. They are furnished with a sharp beak or proboscis, with which they puncture the skin of the leaf, and through which they suck up the sap, the exhaustion of the sap producing on the upper surface yellowish or brownish spots. At first these spots are smal] and do not attract much attention, but as the insects increase in size the discoloured spots become larger, until the whole leaf is involved, when, changing to a yellowish cast, it appears as if scorched, and often drops from the vine. Occasionally the vines become so far defoliated that the fruit fails to ripen.” ‘* As the leaf-hopper enters the second stage of its existence, corresponding to the chrysalis state in other insects, diminutive wings appear, which gradually grow until fully matured, the insect meanwhile becoming increasingly active. With the full growth of the wings it acquires such powers of flight that it readily flies from vine to vine, and thus spreads itself in all directions. It continues its mischievous work until late in the season, when it seeks shelter for the winter.” A species of this insect also attacks the Virginia Creeper, and in a dry season, which seems most favourable for its development, we have known it to completely destroy the foliage of the creepers on a building, and render them leafless before the close of summer. When disturbed the insects hopped in myriads from leaf to leaf, making a sound like the pattering of fine rain. Remedies.—When these insects attack the vines in a glass grapery, it is not very difficult to deal successfully with them. First, carefully close the ventilators and any other openings in the house, and then fumigate thoroughly by burning Persian Insect Powder (Pyrethrum) beneath the vines. This has been found by experiment to be pre- fectly effective. Tobacco may be used instead of insect powder, but the latter is not reliable. After the operation all fallen leaves, etc., should be carefully removed and burnt. Out-of-doors it is by no means so easy to deal with this pest. Fumigation is almost impossible, as the smoke cannot very well be kept long enough about the vines to destroy the insect. Ona calm still day, however, it would be worth trying. It should be done several times at intervals of a few days, and if possible, before the insects have obtained their wings and are able to fly away from the smoke. Syringing with strong soap-suds, tobacco-water, hellebore mixed in water, etc., and dusting with lime or powdered sulphur, have all been recommended, and are remedies worth trying. In all cases it is important to keep the ground clean beneath the vines and leave no rubbish for the protection of the hibernating insects. Mr. Fletcher, in his Report for last year, says that the remedy ‘ which gives the most promise of success is a weak kerosene emulsion in the proportion of one of kerosene to thirty of water, to be applied at the time when the young bugs have first hatched. Mr. John Lowe, the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture at Ottawa, tells me that he has never failed to drive these insects off his grape-vines by simply applying sulphur, which, when liberally applied to the vines, gives off on warm days a perceptible odour of sulphurous acid gas which keeps the insects away.” Dr. Lintner, in his second Report as State Entomologist for New York, mentions that the vapour from tobacco juice has been very successfully employed in France as a remedy for the grape-vine “thrips” and other small insects that infest plant-houses. He quotes the experience of one who has tested it, and who says: ‘“ Ever since I adopted it, “it has been absolutely impossible to find a thrips in my houses; and other insects have’likewise disappeared.” The mode of employing the remedy is thus described :— 5 (EN.) 66 ‘* Every week, whether there are insects or not, I have a number of braziers containing burning charcoal distributed through my houses. On each brazier is placed an old sauce-pan containing about a pint of tobacco juice of about the strength of 14°. This is quickly vaporized, and the atmosphere of the house is saturated with the nicotine-laden vapour, which becomes condensed on everything with which it comes in contact—teaves, bulbs, flowers, shelves, etc. When the contents of the sauce-pans are reduced to the consistency of a thick syrup, about a pint of water is added to each, and the vaporiza- tion goes on as before. 1 consider a pint of tobacco juice sufficient for a house of about 2,000 cubic feet. The smell is not so unpleasant as that from fumigation, and the tobacco juice can be used more conveniently than the leaves. Plants, no matter of what kind, do not suffer in the least, and the most delicate flowers are not in the slightest degree affected, but continue in bloom for their full period, without any alteration in their appearance. When the operation is completed, if the tongue be applied to a leaf, one can easily understand what has taken place from its very perceptible taste of tobacco. The process requires to be repeated in proportion to the extent to which a house is infested. It is not to be imagined that these troublesome guests are to be quite got rid of by a single operation. A new brood may be hatched on the following day, or some may not have been reached on the first day, so that the vaporization should be frequently carried on till the insects have entirely disappeared, and after that it should be repeated every week in order to prevent a fresh invasion.” In France, Dr. Lintner adds, tobacco juice of the strength required can be purchased at the tobacco factories for about fifteen cents a quart, so that the expense is very trifling. Where the juice cannot be readily bought, it may be prepared by ae coarse tobacco: leaves and stems, till the decoction is of the required strength. THe Hop Apuis, (Phorodon humuli, Schrank.) While the hop, like most other cultivated plants, is liable to the attacks of a great many insects, it is in this country specially injured by two very different creatures, the Hop Aphis or Plant-louse, and the Hop Snout-moth. The latter is referred to in another part of this Report by Mr. Fyles. Regarding the former, a most important point in its life-history has at last been cleared up. Till very recently it was not known exactly how or where the insect passed the winter, and conse- quently it was not possible to be quite sure what preventive measures were the best to adopt. Four years ago, Miss Ormerod, Consulting Entomologist to the Royal Agricultural Society of England, published in her annual Report on Injurious Insects, an account of her observations of the Hop Aphis, and stated the conclusions at. which she had arrived. These are so important that I quote her own words: “ (1) The first attack of Aphis to the hop begins in spring from wingless females (depositing living young) which come up from the Hop-hills. (2) The great attack, which usually occurs in the form of ‘Fly’ about the end of May, comes on the wing from Damson and Sloe, as well as from Hop, and the Hop Aphis and the Damson-hop Aphis are very slight varieties of one species, and so similar in habits as regards injury to hop that for all practical puryoses they may be considered one.” These observations, while they confirmed what had been stated by some few ento- mologists at different times, threw a flood of new light upon the life-history of the Hop- Aphis, and led to further investigations by other competent observers. In the November, 1888, number of “ Insect Life,” Dr. C. V. Riley, United States Entomologist, publishes. a paper on this subject, in which he announces that “ We have been able to say for the first time the past year, that we now know positively the full life-history” of the Hop Plant-louse, and states that the questions as to its migration from the Damson to the Hop, and its winter resting place, have now ‘been fully and thoroughly settled.” The following is his summary of the life-history of this insect: ‘‘ Hibernating at the present season of the year (March), the little glossy, black, ovoid eggs of the spevies are found attached to the terminal twigs, and especially in the more or less protected 67 crevices around the buds, of different varieties and species of Prunus, both wild and cultivated From this winter-egg there hatches a stem-mother (Fig. 35), which is char- acterized by being somewhat stouter, with shorter legs and honey tubes than in the individuals of any other generation.” “‘ Three parthenogenetic generations are produced upon Prunus, the third becoming winged (Fig. 36). This last is called the Pseudogyna or the migrant, and it instinctively flies to the hop-plant, which is entirely free from attack during the development of the three generations upon Plum. A number of parthenogenetic generations are produced upon the Hop, until in autumn, and particularly during the month of September, winged females are again produced. This is the pupifera or return migrant, and she instinctively returns to the Plum. Here she at once settles and in the course of a few days, according as the weather permits, pro- duces some three or more young. These are destined never to become winged and are true sexual females (Fig. 37). Somewhat later, on the Hop, the true winged male (Fig. 38), and the only maie of the whole series is developed, and Stem-mother, enlarged ; head and antenna still more enlarged. these males also congregate upon the Plum, on the leaves of which toward the end of Fic. 36. First migrant from the plum, third generation, enlarged ; head at side still more enlarged. Fic. 37. True sexual female, enlarged. the season they may be found pairing with the wingless females, which stock the twigs with the winter eggs (Fig. 39). Such, briefly, is the life-history. Twelve generations may be produced during the year, but there is great irre- gularity in the development of these generations and the return migrant from the Hop is produced at the end of the season whether from individuals of the fourth or fifth generation, or of the twelfth” “Each parthenogenetic female is capable of producing on an average one hundred young (the stem-mother pro- bably being more prolific), at the rate of one to six, or an average of three per day, under favourable conditions. Each generation begins to breed about the eighth day after birth, so that the issue from a single individual easily runs up, in the course of the summer, to trillions. The number of 68 leaves (seven hundred hills, each with two poles and two vines) to an acre of hops, as grown in the United States, will not, on the average, much exceed a million before the period of blooming or burning; so that the issue from a single stem-mother may, under favouring circumstances, blight hundreds of acres in the course of two or three montis.”* Fic. 38. Winged male enlarged. The foregoing account of the life-history of the Hop Aphis is so wonderful and inter- esting that we feel sure the readers of our reports will be glad to have it brought before them. It is also of great value, as it enables hop growers now to apply remedies and use methods of prevention that could not have been devised when the true habits of the insect were unknown. The first and most obvious preventive measure is the destruction of the Aphis on the plum trees in early spring before they have migrated to the hop. This can be done by syringing the trees with a strong tobacco or soap wash, or more effectively still, by using a weak kerosene emulsion. Receipts for making this were given in our report for 1886, but for convenience sake we quote a simple method recommended by Professor A. J. Cook, of the Agricultural College of Michigan ; he says: “I have found nothing so satis- factory in treating plant-lice as the kerosene and “soap mixture. To make this I use one-fourth of a pound of hard soap, preferably whale-oil soap, and one quart of water. This is heated till the soap is dissolved, when one pint of kerosene oil is added, and the whole agitated till a permanent emulsion or mixture is formed. The agitation is easily secured by the use of a force pump, pumping the liquid Fic. 39. with force into the vessel holding it. I then add Eggs and shrivelled skin of female water so that there shall be kerosene in the pro- which laid them, enlarged. portion of 1 to 15.” This mixture has been found most efficient as a remedy for plant-lice, and may be used against them wherever they are found—upon the plum, or hop, or anywhere else. * We have to thank Dr. Riley for his kindness in permitting us to use the above illustrations of the Ce pega were orginally drawn by him to illustrate his paper on the subject in ‘‘ Insect Life,” vol. i., pp. 133-136, 69 Another measure of prevention that should be adopted where hops are grown on a large scale, is the removal and destruction of all wild or cultivated plum trees in the immediate neighbourhood of the plantation. This will take away their winter refuge from the insects, and save an infinite amount of trouble. When the Aphis has made its appearance upon the hop vines, a kerosene emulsion should be at once employed for its destruction. By careful watching and prompt treat- ment this pest can, no doubt, be kept within bounds, but it must be dealt with without delay, othewise its extreme prolificness will soon fill the hop-yard with myriads, and render its destruction very laborious and difficult. Tue Onton Maccor (Phorbia ceparum, Meigen). This imported European insect is quite common in Canada and the Eastern United States, and often proves very destructive to the onion crop. The attack is made by the larva, or maggot, of a little two-winged fly, which eats into the bulb of the onion and destroys it, partly by its own work, and partly by the decay which results*from it. The accompanying illustration (Fig 40) represents the parent fly magnified, the line below showing the natural size with outspread wings; beneath this the pupa is shown, and below it the maggot; the figure to the nght exhibits the maggot devouring the interior of the onion bulb. The fly lays her eggs early in the season on the leaves of the young onion, close to the surface of the ground; from these the young maggots are soon hatched, and pene- trate downwards between the leaves to the base of the bulb. Several of: them are generally found together; they are yellowish white in colour, tapering from one end to the other, and destitute of legs. When not feeding they gen- erally lie just outside the onion in a cell of wet mud, which is kept damp by the exuding juice of the injured plant; they feed for about a fortnight, and then transform in the earth into brown pupz, of an oval shape; from these the Fic. 40. flies emerge in a fortnight or three weeks, and at once lay their eggs for a second brood. In this case, as the leaves are now high above the bulb, the fly lays her eggs on the bulb itself, or on the ground close to it. At the close of the season, the insect remains for the winter in the pupa state, from which the winged flies come forth in early spring to begin another round of the life of the species. Such, in brief, is the life-history of the insect. The best method of dealing with this insect is to prevent the attack if possible. Two modes of doing this have been tried with success. The first, and most satisfactory plan, is to bury the bulb of the onion so that the fly cannot deposit its eggs upon it. This is done by earthing up the plants as is customary with potatoes and corn. The flies must deposit their eggs somewhere, and prefer to do so on the bulb itself, or very close to it; if this is well covered up with earth the eggs are laid higher up on the plant, or on the ground, and the young larve, when hatched, are unable to get to their proper feeding place, and consequently perish without doing any injury. Miss Ormerod recommends growing onions in the garden in a trench, prepared in the same way as for celery, and gradually drawing down the earth from the sides as the plants grow, thus keeping the bulb always covered. She found this plan entirely successful in warding off the attacks of the insect. The second mode of prevention is to scatter about the plants some substance that will be sufficiently obnoxious to the female fly to keep her entirely away from the crop. For this purpose gas-lime has been found most effective. It should be sown broadcast over the bed about once a fortnight, but great care must be taken not to put it on too thickly, as it is extremely caustic, and would seriously injure the plants. Mr. Fletcher 70 says that a light sprinkling, just enough to colour the soil, answers the purpose. As this substance, however, can only be procured from a town where there are gas works, it may be impossible to get it in many localities. A substitute for it may be readily made in the following manner: “Take two quarts of soft soap and boil it in rain water until all is dissolved, then turn in a pint of crude carbolic acid. When required for use take one part of this mixture with fifty of water, and when mixed well together sprinkle directly upon the plants.” This carbolic wash has been found entirely successful in the case of the Radish-maggot, which is very similar in its attack to the Onion-maggot. I[t is recommended to sprinkle the beds every week, commencing two days after the seed is sown, and before any of the young plants are up. As a direct remedy when the onions in the kitchen garden are attacked, it is recom- mended to pour boiling water upon the affected bulbs ; it is stated that this will kill the maggots and not injure the plants. It is certainly worth trying in a few cases to begin with, and then it may be continued, if found satisfactory. It is an important matter, also, to remove from the beds all the onions that are attacked with as little delay as possible. They may be known at once by their leaves fading and turning yellow. It will not answer, however, to merely pull them up by the hand, as in most cases the leaves only will come away, leaving the infested bulb still in the ground, but it will be found necessary to use a spud, or trowel, or some such instru- ment, in order to take up the whole onion with its rotten mass full of maggots. This should at once be put into a pail, from which the creatures cannot escape, and then care- fully destroyed. By so doing the next brood of flies will be materially reduced and the severity of attack diminished. One further point is not to grow onions two years in succession on the same ground, and if a bed has been infested by the maggot to turn the surface soil deeply under in the autumn and bury the pupe deep enough to prevent, or at any rate retard, their development in the spring. THe SquasH-Buc (Coreus tristis, De Geer). Most persons who cultivate the squash in their gardens have probably noticed at times several of the leaves to be strangely withered, and on investigating further have found the cause to be a number of disgusting looking bugs gathered together on the underside of the leaves. There is usually a large colony collected together, composed of individuals of all sizes from the tiny newly-hatched bug to the old winged specimen half an inch long, represented in Fig. 41. The life-history of the insect may be briefly related, as follows :—The full-grown insects that have managed to escape the various perils to which their lives are exposed during the summer, retire into winter quarters on the approach of cold weather, and conceal themselves in various nooks and crevices. There they remain in a torpid state all winter, and come forth when warm weather returns in May. At this time of the year and also in the autumn, they may be found in all sorts of unlikely places, but as soon as the squash plant has put forth its first few leaves, the insects take shelter under them and lay their eggs for the future crop of destroyers. The female deposits her eggs in little patches on the underside of the leaves, to which they adhere, and per- J forms the work for the most part at night. This takes place late in June, Fic. 41. or even in July if the season is backward, but the eggs are soon hatched and there issue from them the tiny little bugs. At first these are ash-coloured, with large flattish antenne, and without any wings, but they grow rapidly and with each moult become darker above and paler beneath ; at the same time they gradually change their form from a round scale-like appearance to an oblong oval, with a triangular head. As the eggs are laid at intervals, fresh broods keep coming out all summer, and thus specimens of all ages and sizes are usually found crowded together on the same leaf. They all have an excessively disagreeable smell, which is intensified when their bodies are crushed. Like all true bugs they live by suction, each one being provided with a long slender beak or sucker, with which it punctures the leaves and draws up the sap. 71 The effect of a swarm of these creatures pumping away at the life fluid of the plant is the speedy withering of the leaf and the serious injury, if not destruction, of the whole plant. As the bugs congregate together for the most part on the under side of the leaves, and their presence is indicated by the withered foliage, much may be done to diminish their numbers by the simple operation of hand-picking and crushing under foot or burning. It is well, also, to examine carefully the underside of the leaves of an affected plant, and destroy all eggs that may be found. This remedy is of easy application where only a few squash plants are grown in a garden. But if the cultivation takes place ona large scale, hand-picking of eggs and bugs becomes rather impracticable. The following remedy may then be employed: Take two quarts of powdered plaster of Paris, and add to it a tablespoonful of coal oil ; sprinkle this mixture on the plants, especially on the stems and leaves nearest the root, where the attack is always made first. It is stated (Lintner’s Report, ii. 29) that one application of this will generally answer for the season, but it should be repeated if the bugs return. The author of the remedy says: “TI applied it this season on several thousand hills of melons, cucumbers, etc., after the bugs had commenced operations, and have not since had a vine destroyed. I have used it for several seasons with the same result. This is safer and cheaper than Paris green.” The use of liquid manure and cultivation in a good rich soil is further recommended, for when the plants attain a vigorous growth, the loss of sap occasioned by these insects is not so much felt. As already indicated, they also attack the melon, cucumber and other allied plants. THE Tent OAaTERPILLARS (Clisiocampa Americana and Sylvatica). Everyone must be familiar with the webs of the Tent Caterpillars, and must have noticed the amount of mischiet they do if left unchecked. They are so abundant and so widespread throughout the country that it seems advisable to mention again some of Fic. 42. the most effective remedies for them. So few people take the trouble to interfere with the ravages of these pests that it is important to constantly draw public attention to them, even at the risk of seeming tiresome to the well-informed reader. i es 72 There are two insects familiarly known as Tent Caterpillars, from the silken webs they make upon trees. They are very similar‘in appearance and habits, but can always be distinguished from each other. One of them is called the Apple-tree Tent Caterpillar (Clisiocampa Americana, Harris), because it especially attacks apple trees. It is also very fond of the wild cherry, and will feed upon many other fruit trees. This insect is so destructive and so serious a pest that it should be fought at every stage of its existence, and the work of extermination may be begun even in the winter. When the trees are destitute of foliage, the egg-masses may be readily seen with a little practice near the end of the twigs. They are represented at c in the accompanying illustration, Fig. 42. By going around the orchard on a dull day in winter, when there is no sun to dazzle the eyes, the bracelet of eggs may be easily discovered, and if cut off and burnt, it will exterminate what would otherwise turn into a nest full of caterpillars in the spring. When winter is over and the young leaves are just beginning to burst from their buds, it will be time to make another round of observation. The warmth of the spring days that has caused the buds to open and the tender leaves to expand, has also hatched the tiny eggs of this insect. The little caterpillars at first eat the gummy substance with which the egg-mass was covered for protection from wet and cold, and then they spin a fine web of white silk in a fork of the bough they are on. This forms the headquarters. of the colony, and from it they make silken roads to the nearest bunch of foliage. As they grow in size, the more voracious they become, and the further they extend their rambles in search of food, until when fully grown they scatter all over the tree, or migrate to others near. The time to deal with them is evidently when they are small and collected together in their tent. Before the trees are in full leaf,.the glistening white tents can be seen at once, and it will be found that the caterpillars collect together in them when the weather is inclement, and also when they are not feeding. They usually go out for their meals twice a day, in the morning and afternoon ; at other times they are in their tents. Early in the morning and at night they are sure to be at home, and then is the time to destroy them. By inserting a rough stick into the middle of the . web and twisting it round and round, the whole mass, caterpillars, web and all, can be brought away without difficulty, and then the worms can be crushed under foot or even between the gloved hands. If this matter is attended to early in the season, there will be no further trouble from them that year. Boys can do this work as well as anyone, and perhaps they can be taught that there is jyst as much fun in usefully destroying caterpillars’ nests as in mischievously robbing those of the farmers’ good friends, the birds, The work, however, should not be confined to the orchard and garden. These insects are even more partial to the wild cherry than to the apple, and often these trees. on the borders of the woods and along the roads may be found covered with these tents. Of course, they should be as carefully destroyed as if they were on the most valuable fruit trees, for, if let alone, they will produce a crop of moths that will fly in all direc- tions and lay their eggs even in the most vigilantly watched garden. Dr. Fitch recom- mended that some wild cherry trees should be planted on the borders of the orchard, in order that the moths might be attracted to Jay their eggs on them in preference to the - apple, as he says, it will be much easier to destroy a hundred egg-masses or tents on a single tree than if they were scattered over a hundred separate trees. Various remedies have been proposed for these caterpillars, such as coal oil, soap suds, lye, ete., but there is no method so simple and easy, and so thoroughly efficacious as destroying the tents in early spring. Where this is neglected, the results are disastrous, and orchards are some- times seen denuded of foliage and in a pitiable state, owing to the laziness or ignorance, or both, of the owner. Such people ought to be indicted as a public nuisance, for they not only lose their own fruit, but they keep a nursery for supplying their neighbours. with these destructive pests. The next stage in the life-history of the insect is the formation of the cocoon and the change into a chrysalis. Before undergoing this transformation, the caterpillars. wander away from the tree, and search for some sheltered place, such as the underside of the top boards or stringers of a fence, loose pieces of bark, etc. Here they spin each one an oval cocoon (Fig. 42, d) of yellowish silk, mixed up with which is some yellow dust 73 which looks like powdered sulphur. These cocoons should be looked for and destroyed in the month of June. . The final transformation of the insect is to the perfect state, that of the winged moth. Fig. 43 represents the male ; the female is much similar but ge larger. The colour is a dull, reddish brown with paler oblique bars RE across the fore-wings, as shown in the figure. The body is stout S= and the whole creature very fluffy. They usually appear early in July and may at once be recognized, as they are attracted into our houses by lights at night, by the mad way in which they dash about ! the room, here and there and everywhere, singeing their wings at Fic. 43. the lamp, then spinning on their heads on the table, and if it should be supper-time drop- ping into the butter dish and covering its contents with the fluff off their bodies. These idiotic performances may enable any one to identify them, and the opportunity should be taken of destroying them, both for the purpose of getting rid of a present nuisance and of a future generation. Fie. 44. The other insect referred to at the outset is called “‘The Forest Tent Caterpillar,” Clistocampa sylvatica, Harris. It resembles the Apple-tree Tent Caterpillar very closely in appearance at all its stages, and also to some extent in its habits. The eggs are laid in clusters (Fig. 44 a) on the twigs of trees as in the other species, but the mass is cut square, as it were, at the ends instead of being rounded. The difference may be observed by comparing the two figures, The individual eggs are of the shape shown at Fig 44d; the top 1s depressed and circular, as at c. The caterpillar is also very like that of the other species in colour and appearance, but may be distinguished from it by the series of white spots along the back, which in the Apple Caterpillar are united into a continuous line. Compare Figures 45 and 42 and the difference will be plain at once. The moth (Fig. 444) resembles its congener in general colour and appearance, but may be distinguished by its paler or more yellowish colour and by the transverse bars on the wings being dark brown instead of white. Very much the same methods may be employed against this insect in all its stages, as have been recommended for the other species. The most important difference in habit is that the Forest Caterpillar spins a web against a bough or on the trunk of a tree instead of a tent in a fork, and congregates at times on the outside of the web instead of beneath it. When gathered together im this way numbers may easily be destroyed by crush- ing them with a stick or pole. These insects are very voracious feeders, and if let alone 74 will speedily defoliate a tree. As they attack many ornamental shade trees as well as those in the forest and sometimes extend their ravages to fruit trees, they should be ruth- lessly exterminated wherever they are met with. We have now remarked upon some of our most common insect pests, and have endeavoured to furnish the reader with the most approved modes of dealing with them. We shall feel very thankful to any one who tries any of these remedies if he will be good enough to let us know how far they have proved successful. The experience will be of much value to us and we shall probably be able to make it of service to others. A TRIP TO NEPIGON., Some Notes uPoN CoLLEcCTING AND BREEDING BUTTERFLIES FROM THE EGG. BY JAMES FLETCHER, OTTAWA. It is a recognized fact in Economic Entomology that the most important investi- gations are those by which the life-histories of insects are made out, in order that the most appropriate remedies may be adopted for injurious species. In Scientific Ento- mology these investigations are no less important, but are undertaken with different objects in view. For the accurate determination and separation of closely related species, it is frequently necessary to know an insect in all its stages from the egg to the perfect form. In no branch of Natural History is this more necessary than with some of our Diurnal Lepidoptera—the butterflies—those living flowers which flitting from blossom to blossom add such an unspeakable charm to the summer landscape. In the North American insect fauna we have some very large genera, as the Fritillaries (Argynnide) and the Clouded Yellows (Coliades). These contain many closely allied species, and it would actually be difficult in all cases to identify with certainty the perfect insects, without a knowledge of the preparatory stages, and some have only been shown to be distinct by breeding from the egg, and noting carefully the points upon which they constantly differ in their various stages of growth. Whilst, in the first case, the exact scientific identification of the insect, its classification, name and specific value are of little interest, so that so much of its habits can be discovered as will enable us to put a stop to, or prevent a recurrence of its ravages ; in the other case, the exact identification and correct classification are the important points aimed at. Sometimes, as in the well-known cases of Papilio Ajax, Colias Lurytheme and Grapta Interrogationis, several apparently very different varieties have been shown to be merely varietal forms of one species, and the interesting discovery has been made that one or other of these forms preponderates at certain seasons of the year. These dis- coveries are chiefly due to the constant and untiring labours of Mr. W. H. Edwards, of West Virginia, who not only himself patiently and persistently perseveres in his studies, but has also taken great pains to induce others to help in the work. His kindness and prompt attention in advising and helping others cannot be too highly spoken of. In the Canadian Entomologist, for 1885, appeared some admirable articles upon breed- ing from the egg, in which the results of his long experience were given. These have been of great assistance to those who have taken up this most interesting branch of entomology, and the writer acknowledges with gratitude his own indebtedness. Those who have never caught a butterfly and caged it to obtain its eggs, and then bred these to maturity, cannot form the slightest idea of the all-absorbing interest and pleasure that attend these observations. Moreover, their utility, as teaching what to observe, how to observe it, and then how to record what is seen, so that it may be of use to others, cannot be over-estimated. At first, of course, there are some difficulties, but with a little practice these can be overcome. This fact is particularly manifest in drawing or de- scribing the young caterpillars at the different moults. All caterpillars change their skins four or five times after they leave the egg, so as to allow for the rapid increase in size of their growing bodies. At all these moults, important changes in the structure and in the markings of the skin take place, and for this reason they 75 eee should be carefully described and the head case should always be preserved at each moult. The skin cannot as a rule be preserved, for the young caterpillar after having worked it off generally devours it at once. There is a prevalent idea that great difficulty attends the obtaining eggs and rearing the larve; but this is not at all the case; a few eggs of many species may be obtained from ripe females by merely shutting them in a pill box. In this way I have secured eggs of Pieris Napi, P. Rape, Thecla Niphon, T. Calanus, Lycena Lucia, etc., etc. These eggs hatch after a few days and then all that is necessary is to put them in any small receptacle which will prevent their food from drying up, as a tin box or glass jar, or what is better they may be placed upon a living plant out of doors. Many eggs may be obtained and much valuable information may be gathered by hunting for the eggs upon the food plant, or by watching the females in nature. The action of butterflies when intent upon egg-laying, will soon be recognized, and patient observation will frequently reward the student by the discovery of an unknown food plant. A knowledge of the habits and food of allied species even in other parts of the world will frequently assist greatly. The field, too, is so large and the amount of work yet to be done, so great that the merest tyro may hope to obtain good results in a very short time. I purpose in the pre- sent paper to give an account of a collecting trip I had the privilege of making with Mr. S. H. Scudder, of Cambridge, during the past summer, I believe that the experience then gained and a description of the apparatus used will be of assistance to others who have not yet taken up this fascinating study. Our trip together was made in the beginning of July, and was from Ottawa to Nepigon and back. Nepigon is a small station on the Canadian Pacitie Railway, very picturesquely situated at the mouth ofthe rapid river Nepigon, which brings down the icy waters from the lake of the same name, about fifty miles due north ; and discharges them into Nepigon Bay, the most northern point of that great triangular inland sea, Lake Superior. It is claimed for this river, that it is the only river which discharges clear water into the lake, and that its trout are larger and fishing better than those of any other river in Canada. Be this as it may, it has gained such celebrity that during the summer there is a constant stream of visitors who come for a week or fortnight to try their luck with Nepigon trout, and the verdict of all seems to be ‘‘ we must come again.” The village consists of the railway station, which is also used as a church, an hotel and two stores, as well as several surveyed lots for the site of the future town. About half a mile from the railway, by the side of the river is the neat Hudson Bay post of Red Rock, now presided over by the genial and courteous Mr. Flanigan, who always remembers anyone he has once met, takes an interest in their pursuits and is ready with advice and assistance whenever required. Nepigon is very prettily situated ; as you approach it by the railway from the east, the first glimpse you get is from the iron bridge which spans the river half a mile from the station. Then a charming picture bursts on the view. Away to the left lies a long range of hills, behind which are the lake and Nepigon Bay with its islands and indented shores. They are some miles away and the river gradually widening, winds its way down to them amongs’ green fields and wooded banks. A glimpse is got of the pretty Hudson Bay pést with its neat white building -and the rest of the landscape is filled in by the high banks of the river, thickly clothed at the top with trees. After passing beneath the bridge the river swings away to the right, and has cyt out from the clay an extensive bay, leaving a steep cliff of clay over 100 feet in height. Looking out on the other side, up the river you see Lake Helen, a beautiful sheet of water, stretching away to the north for eight miles, with a width of one mile, and bounded on its eastern side by a rocky ridge of laurentian gneiss and with elevated wooded banks to the west or left. ‘‘The Ridge,” as we called it, to the right is the higher of the two, and was found to be bare rock in many places with little vegetation. Arri- ving at Nepigon station we took our traps to the Taylor House, an excellent hotel, most clean and comfortable, and having made arrangements for meals, we sallied forth at once with our nets to “ look at the locality.” It may not be amiss to stop here for a few moments and explain what brought us to Nepigon in preference to any other place. 76 That there was some strong attraction it will be readily granted. I had gone there from Ottawa (808 miles) two years running, before this season, and had now persuaded Mr. Scudder to come all the way from Boston to accompany me. I have elsewhere mentioned that in 1885 Professor Macoun brought back with him from this locality a collection of butterflies. In this collection were some of exceptional interest and one of which was a great surprise. This was a new species of the Arctic genus Chionobas (or @neis, Hib). It was a surprise not so much from being a species. of that genus but from being of a distinctly western type. It resembles most nearly Ch. Californica of the Pacific coast and is a large species, expanding from 2 to 24 inches. Besides this there were several specimens of Colias Interior, Scud, Argynnis Electa, Edw., as well as many other insects, and amongst them a small Chrysophanus, of which Mr. Edwards says ‘it may be Florus.” Iam of the opinion that it certainly is not Hellozdes, Bd., but it seems to me to approach more nearly to Dorcas, Kirby, and Epixanthe,B.L. The female is the same size as Dorcas and the spots are almost identically the same. In the Nepigon species, however, the colour of the upper surface is deep purplish brown, and upon both primaries and secondaries, between the margin and the post-median band of black spots, is a band of orange lunules running out to the broad margin from each spot on the primaries. These are larger and longer outside the three lowest spots, correspond- ing with the greater distance of these three spots from the margin than the three upper- most. On the secondaries the orange spots are much smaller and the continuous band although discernible is indistinct towards its upper end. The coloration of the under side is very rich, being bright rusty orange, slightly washed with purple over the secondaries and at the apices of primaries. The spots and marks, as on the upper side, are like those of Dorcas, of which indeed this form is possibly a variety. I have mentioned it here at some length because it has not been taken again at Nepigon since Professor Macoun took the five specimens he brought back with him. Specimens identical with these were sent to me by Dr. W. Brodie, of Toronto, who took them at Tobermorey in the same district in September. Now, the eggs of the species I have mentioned and those of Carterocephalus Mandan. were our particular desiderata and these were the attractions which led us to Nepigon in preference to nearer places. The whole fauna and flora of the locality are, however, of particular interest from their northern character. The geographical position of Nepigon is about lat. 49°, lon. 88°, and apart from its northern position it has a cooling influence exercised upon it by the proximity of the large mass of cold water found in Lake Superior. The difference in the state of development of the plants here and at Ottawa was at once noticeable when we left the hotel and began to search for the treasures we had come for. In the clearing round the station and “village ” wild strawberries and raspberries were still in flower, and the white stars of Cornus Canadensis were a conspicuous feature. In the woods the Lake Superior Nodding Trillium, 7’. declinatwm, was still in flower, together with Clintonia borealis. A variety of Rosa blanda was just beginning to expand, and the bushes of Amelanchier Canadenis were a beautiful sight. Streptopus roseus and Actea alba were everywhere abundant beneath the trees, and amongst the mossy stumps Coptis trifolia and Mvtella nuda opened their gemlike flowers. By the river banks magnificent clumps of Caltha palustris, the marsh marigold, caught the eye. All these are spring flowers which at Ottawa expand their blossomsin the middle or end of May, and although there were some flowers of a later date amongst them, the character of the flora was such 48 we had seen at Ottawa at least a month sooner. We learnt upon enquiry that upon the Ist of June the woods had a great deal of snow in them and the ice had only lately left the river. The collecting grounds at Nepigon may be described as follows :—Starting from the hotel near the railway and going down to the Hudson Bay post is a tract of low wood- land and beyond this are the fields and meadows belonging to the Hudson Bay post. Opposite the hotel and north of the railway is a road running back into the woods, and parallel with Lake Helen. This is called “the wood road,” and is used in the winter time to bring down firewood from the high lands beyond the clearing. Turning west- ward along the track, high rocks and banks soon come down to the railway on the right ae hand side ; but to the left are low woods with open grassy glades which at once tempt the entomologist—nor will he be disappointed for this is the now celebrated ‘“‘ Macoun’s glade,” the home of Chionobas Macounii and many other little beauties. The other locality lies in the opposite direction, and turning eastward after leaving the hotel you pass down through a hot gravelly cutting and cross the iron bridge over the river. On your right hand you have high woods and on the left an extensive swamp thickly covered with small spruce and tamarac. About a mile from the bridge the Ridge is reached and this runs away to the north until it reaches the shores of the lake. Upon July 5th we reached Nepigon at 12:20 p. m. and by 1 o’clock had unpacked the necessary apparatus, had disposed of dinner and were ready to start. Our apparatus for each collector, consisted of a net, two cyanide bottles, one for lepidoptera the other for grasshoppers, etc., a bottle of spirit for beetles, and a flat tin box 4 inches by 3 and 1 inch deep filled with envelopes for butterflies, as well as a supply of pill boxes for boxing living females and a yard or two of netting for making cages. Before leaving the hotel we picked up half a dozen empty tomato cans and having removed the two ends we covered one of them with a piece of netting kept in place by an elastic band. We were now ready and turning westward, before many yards were passed we were arrested by a clump of Anaphalis Margaritacea which was receiving the busy attention of a female Pyrameis Huntera ; she was secured and boxed at once. Passing on along the line we found the banks on either side resplendent with clumps of Mertensia paniculata, a beautiful plant with rich deep-green leaves and a profusion of pure blue bell-shaped flowers which hang pendent from small branchlets. Flowers of a real blue are very uncommon in nature and to see such profusion as we here found was very charming. Darting around these flowers with lightning swiftness were a few pugnacious skippers. We caught one specimen which was at once recognised as strange. It belongs to the “‘Comma group” of Pamphila and somewhat resembles Man- atoba. What is probably the same species was afterwards taken on “the ridge” and eggs were secured. After passing a deep gully a few hundred yards along the track we turned in by a bridle path towards Macoun’s glade. Insects of all descriptions were in the greatest profusion and this is undoubtedly a character of this locality. In no place, except perhaps Vancouver Island, have I seen such enormous numbers of specimens as we found here. The air seemed to be filled with them, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Orthoptera, Diptera—Ah ! the very word carries me back in thought. Yes. There were Diptera and the character of the locality was carried out—they were in profusion. Nepigon as well as being famed for its trout is famed for its ‘‘flies,” mosquitoes, black- flies, sand-flies, tabanus, chrysops. Oh! The thought of them!! An appropriate variety for every hour of the day and they all carried out their mission in life with a vengeance. They could however be kept within reasonable bounds with a little care and forethought. ‘Mosquito oil” composed of sweet oil, oil of penny-royal and carbolic acid, applied to the face and neck and backs of the hands was found to be efficient out-of- doors. Some people however are too obstinate to use this harmless unguent averring that “flies don’t trouble them much,” and they don’t like putting such mess on them- selves. These people however sometimes have to suffer severely and it will be found that ‘the prevention is well worth the trouble. In our bedrooms at night we enjoyed perfect immunity from attack by burning a small quantity of Pyrethrum powder before we went tobed. The recollection of that phalanx of bloodthirsty flies which met us at the entrance to Macoun’s glade has led me to digress somewhat ; but at any rate they were a feature of the place and a most noticeable one. As we stepped into the pathway which leads into the glade, I was carefully pointing out to my companion that we were now in the exact spot where the original type specimens were collected, when he rushed by me witha yell and sprang out into the bushes, exclaiming, Look out! There is one—here it is! and the first specimen of Chivnobas Macounii was secured—a minute later I had another. Hurrah! well done. We were now in a high state of glee. I had been to N epigon once before at exactly the right season and again a month later, but had not seen a specimen, and had begun to think that perhaps after all there might possibly be some mistake about the locality. It was all right now, though, and as we were to stay a week we felt confi- dent of getting eggs. We took four more males on the 5th of July. We examined 78 thoroughly this beautiful glade and collected several specimens, but the most important part of the afternoon’s work was settling upon a spot for our cages. For ease in examining them, these were all placed near to each other. In the glade was a great profusion of flowers and grasses, a few spruces, cedars and pines mixed with poplars, aspens (Populus tremloides) and birches, all of which were dotted about in a waving sea of grasses. The most conspicuous and abundant of which were, in the low parts Avena striata and Poa debilis, together with a profusion of low Carices, C. bromoides being very plentiful. Upona sandy bank towards the railway Danthonia spicata grew in tufts with Carex Houghtonii and other lower species of carex. Amongst them Convolvulus spithameus opened its glorious white corollas. To the west- ern end of the glade was a dry swampy tract, or rather a dry track where were growing - many plants which in the east only grow in wet bogs and swamps. The Labrador tea (Ledum latifoliwm), Cassandra calyculata, Viburnum cassinoides, Kalmias, Eriophorums, Sphagnums and Drosera rotundifolia were all here in luxuriant profusion. Wiliows of various species were everywhere. Through the centre of this glade runs a path which had been used during the construction of the railway, and along this as everywhere through the country where hay has been carried for horses, red and white clover and timothy grass grow abundantly. Beyond this swampy corner the ground rises again and is covered with trees and bushes. Upon this elevated knoll was the only place where we took Lycena Comyntas and L. Couperi neither of which were abundant. Before leaving the glade for the night, we caged Pyrameis Huntera over a plant of Anaphalis margari- tacea, this is too large a species for confining in a tomato can cage, so another kind had to be constructed. This is made by cutting two flexible twigs from a willow or any other shrub and bending them into the shape of two arches which are put one over the other at — right angles with the ends pushed into the ground; over the pent-house thus formed a piece of*gauze is placed, and the cage is complete. The edges of the gauze may be kept down either with pegs or earth placed upon them. This kind of cage was used for all the larger species which lay upon low plants. Besides the specimens of Ch. Macownti we had taken many other species of butterflies, moths, beetles and flies. Among the moths several specimens of Vemeophilu Selwynwi another new species discovered by Prof. Macoun in this locality. When we got home in the evening we found that a party of American fishermen had arrived and in the hour before tea had already stocked the larder with Nepigon trout, the reputed excellent qualities of which we afterwards tested and unanimously concurred in. The evening was pleasantly spent enjoying Mrs. Flanigan’s genial hospitality, and after we got home labelling, dating and’ packing away our specimens. This is a most important duty and must be doneevery day. Nothing isso easy to forget as the exact date or locality of a specimen, and when this is lost much of the value of the specimen is gone. We never allowed fatigue or any other cause to induce us to put off this part of our work till the morrow. The delicious cool nights were a great treat to us after the exceedingly hot weather we had both experienced during June, and we appreciated all the more the cool breezes, the exhilarating air and the refreshing bathing in the icy Nepigon, when our daily letters. kept telling us of the great heat which was prevailing at this time throughout the greater part of Ortario and the Northern States. The next morning we were up early, note books were written up and preparations. made fortheday. We found that few insects were moving before 8.30, so we seldom started until that hour. Our daily routine was as follows:—Write up notes before breakfast, visit the cages after breakfast, then work down to the river about noon, and take a swim, call at. Mr. Flanigan’s to receive and post letters, dinner at one; collect. in the afternoon. After tea walk a mile down the track to a delicious spring and bring back a tin pailful of water for drinking. After this one pipe, then label, discuss and put away the captures of the day, and go to bed. On the 6th we started off at once to Macoun’s glade with the set purpose of getting females of Macownii, and, as is generally tne case when one starts with a set purpose, we were at last successful. As we stepped out into the glade there sailed away from our feet a bright brown butterfly, with black stripes. So much of the size, appearance and graceful flight of Limenitis — Disippus as almost to have escaped our notice. Something about it, however, seemed 79 different, and a few steps and the well-known twist of the wrist, captured our first speci- men of female Macounii. Oh, but she was a beauty! Colour bright brown, with the nervures all darkened, and bearing on the primaries two large and white-pupilled black ocelli with one small one between them. The females we found to vary very much. Most of them were handsomer and darker than the males, with larger ocelli and the nervures almost always clearly marked out with black—some, however, and particularly one female taken by Professor Macoun in 1885, at Morley, in the Rocky Mountains, is of the beautiful pale golden brown of Ch. Californica. Morley is the only other known locality for this fine species. Its most interesting feature is the total absence in the males of the sexual streak of special scales, or Androconia, which marks the males of this genus. During the day we secured altogether nine females, and tied them in three cages over clumps of grass, (Avena striata). When we left we carried away with us upwards of 250 eggs, which were afterwards dis- tributed to everyone we knew of who would take the trouble to rear the larve. Con- spicuous objects at this time were the Yellow Swallow-tails, (P. Z’urnus), and one was seen to lay an egg upon a small aspen. This was a new food plant to us both, so captu- ring half a dozen females they were tied in a gauze bag over a branch of a living aspen tree. This was another kind of cage, and is very useful for such insects as Papilio, Limevitis and Grapta. Care must be taken, however, that the leaves of the branch inside may be in a natural position, for some species are very particular about where they place their eggs. For instance, Visoniades-[celus and Papilio Turnus lay on top of the leaves, Limenitis on the edge near the tip, and many others as Danais Archippus, Pyra- meis Huntera, Colias Ewrytheme, underneath. Some, as the Lycznas, Jay upon the small: flower stems. ; y ae [ot ‘< | ne ele: : nF nial) my ota hts f ah ‘ nth 03.54 aie Fer l : 2. 7 anos Ra “ febats th rm: seri i] 4 Pcie 3 xi gl ee a ay Sepeihe 7 ye ieee eR Hr oy) ee . i as ath oe ae ES ‘| LE saiy # rer a jes Ea Boy: 4) het he »‘Tepstriigette BMe : ea | 4p art ta 1h ps ca MO _* », vk A: eer ty ¢ Fbast bee Se) ft f¢ 5 ‘Sire seg : ; aa ee 4. ats Ba dal er y iy $4 Ane! Ceol te Zee 4 MA, sti » |v evel higdede et SE - y eh Bh st fig : TAS La Ora! oe ne mg tre wid ath’ jee! ee 4 493 1» ee ae a rp “eer +t ALS a OO ee th Hite lhe Poh a hl Bava o> ee yilt4ey ei Re m ioe Ons H. a His PAR 4 bophat Po vile $43 Set Heart a, t ma 1° SP ARS eis et pick ai) tobi alae a et: fe a a) * ¢ “ ; ‘i q he J . : Fr | rb 7 7 a 5 oe LATE: "LY alten bP Spe bse eS ay: {uh sre a. Rider's 7 ix Ne : 4 } 4 ut f iit 6 er tii 10 Aaa’ BA were dct: Pride Matis SEY ue iy - o ae ‘3 aun “is ieee ae ; : BEL OF Mh peach, HP mere, fethiygiohe cabert ? edith. 10 (ae i ie ph SM, Leen alee nee a ne Das oie Lie IE Ee ; Lied eared shhl (> mad PSG ae GMa». rite ten ead Ph, TADS, 9M Os Trl tee GANA SONS ae Ro “oti mig ENO LY Oe ON Si 8 Feit Re Oe AE Pave eS 4 2S opie find ; % P t ; 7 . =e ; « # a2 are bt > Ty Th iT, in : ’ ee? ee ee i A Je Be tae “ . ’ 2/89) PS ‘ ’ 5 7 rl Lat} ; ii al r. { + ‘it { $ wat g - x. oe = fe ‘ - 234 . ‘oh off ; or ; ‘ %; = xi TH ‘ - eet Ay Milpwd ' hp far\| cy Ja bes "t a ees f 7 $ ‘ , i 4 ~ c “ ; tP Prihy j i ‘ z rT f iL stars ‘ = nm a . Ms ? et he * i ; _ ' Yt ested Bo vated Petit 4 PH +17 er vf Pa 7" * am wai? { ri 4.49 By ot fy Sat Ee y ‘% i 4 , . ' { bs iy MEXT eT GON ee Ria ar a) - = Pee 7 ca ’ ' ~ ; f : “a fs ‘ ‘ 2, ns ~ ) 4 ’ iv . ‘i '~ iM guih : ; ‘ i Cie \ 2 a ee; ‘ ~ ‘ ow “ : i 5? ' ® fs ; pape +? e, - : 3. Gey f ’ a ree . a eee Mg ti! ): Je . ADP ri eo een, al -# °‘“< . : + = 3 . t : 5 ’ - = Ae - i i § , : a2 4 4 iS iat iis AS8 Lie sR) et Be £m | si ° : ie DS 4 Cpe ee PS Dinah $ tnt & : ape oi: fant Loctite tea =) ; ; ti eee MIULS. ent 18! WM = EP. 38-1869. 6. Presi TWENTY-FIRST ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FRUIT GROWERS ASSOCIATION or eern TA RIO: 1889. PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. TORONTO: PRINTED BY WARWICK & SONS, 68 AND 70 FRONT STREET WEST, 1890. a") po lane CONTENTS. EER De SFL TS ENLISTS OM Ala ori, «ios ice os ae wis on n,o 0 a nw ance Hina ewe py ealOe weeole peieiae v. RE SLURS. oe To Soo pila as ones a guid & ole ms av wend’ o Seva owes ARES PEE vi. NI GEER 15a 1 oi wm ov «dase sae ws ie, sine n Sin Sedo wD - come a a vil. EEA BULLDOG Sir te EAA, 3 a'02 Fe fF be ds debi y ols Un de dee woe eS cas ele eae Vili. SRE NCW MCReesis PEUTRMEMSOUFCLALY ($1. 5. 0.02 8 )0 oss cule dann Cae Ga ebeee ten teneee aces ix. RRR OTIt A Cement OR, AAI oc. sos ee caw ween he av wavclnes aalcemmaee xii. gg I RE ofc a Sls o «bie cies a on b oie a bsles ate eb aelx cee talda yee mest 1 Russian Fruit Trees. What of them? D. W. Beadle, St. Catharines................... A Apple Growing in Ontario. Thomas Beall, Lindsay...........-..--.-..seccccccuwnecten + a en a ew oho ind RN os o.oo wom a 60 ino oe nin we v vielen ve dniilaps cioaa wae eee 11 Hortieultural Specialties for the Canadian Farmer. The Secretary ...................... 11 Ie EE ioe <5 Sah an se Soe ss ce Gs Xess cise d swsin die navesd suaegeeeeee 16 ee OATES pee OnIN, OMe... 2. ec oe Sele esc c ec wecnes ou nuanaudeue ee i9 =oeenry Abroad and at Home. R. W. Phipps, Toronto..............2..005.c0eeeneese 21 Reem wean i. S, Dodds, Hyderabad, India.......... 2-22. .0cce cece ce scencees 29 EIN EMRE ATER CR ERSEUMADONR AZ lho wot nt oP «anole =.= 2 2 nidie os sass whos owt Bane SERRE 31 NEM Sra naga s So sss We E TE wnaie rie eeid welds ea aes wade vers ad siete 36 SES SESS a, Ee eo ee Per 7 i nnMnnE MERMEE LIGNANS 120. Gare ae atesacre> be vitae <1. Ded Sule i de Pa aa ces See 39 ES ee ee te Cee ere ne rene ae en ee ts 41 EME ME PP So Finis cas a cje Sis cade dino, RS Chae chame Pini Dd ahaa Se 43 Want of Taste for Horticulture among Farmers. A. M. Smith, St. Catharines........._. 43 Fertilisation of tlants. [rof. J. H. Panton, Ontario Agricultural College, Guelph. . 45 Birds Useful and Injurious in Horticulture. T. McIlwraith, Hamilton.................. 50 Growth and Marketing of Grapes. E. D. Smith, Winona................2. 0.0.0.0 eee 58 Experience in Fruit Garden for Home Use. T. H. Race, Mitchell...................... 63 Varieties of Plums for Home Use and Market. Geo. Cline, Winona.................... 66 SR MMBStEIRIGUN MLE ISING 8. DADOE oo 2s cals oo a gals x os sos 2052S emcee +a oe Ae a 71 Seen oF Ctuit ab Hamilton Meeting 3. %. 0... ec bec bone nad ene ee cet Paecndeeventene 7 SPPRMnNTeP ai AL ATONE. fh jo ts 0. Saad cles, 2 aed s lg SOs RERES SC ee 68 PEE PEE PIES ECKI EES oy. Do Se ne ee 22 Ya ase «3 cic wiasgtd «ain: duels eee 69 Grapes for Home Use, Methods of Culture, etc. M. Pettit, Winona................... 69 Senta of Pairs, “Phos, Beall Uimdaay . .-<. .\< «

... -.. 4. 2i02 2s0%'s«- os. wie ate Rete ee eee 128 * This matter should have followed on page 68. i~ io Tal) *s eae a " ee ee me hy i ry x * ‘ ‘ ye i eh & - Fe of od i ‘r- Si ; - id: ’ ; F ; Gls ; t ay iv ii ' af J ar 4 ‘ rvs) ‘aA . ; A p , Sh alot ,; j ‘ « eee dv Veviad aes la ete < a ' iz iM nd . , 1 Kw e - 4 ; / i sya eae gh a Y cteal ieee oth ; ot big > r sapere te t fats & 4) ' ¢ ; # Cdl F R 7 A + Ave eB ¥ = F ee . vt 4 ; bi, Ait cS 4 4 f 4 ; = i ¥ >, e. vf 2 : eAlgRe 'bg ¢ i jan ' ie ~ ‘ us { ; , P A ‘ aA! 7 ive ¥ “ f Sof i i Py are, i i . \ os e i ; ‘; ® ju res i all } — 4 ae lbaiyt i e% A 7 % ' I l i ~ z Pa x r ‘ wb Es wi f ) mie of) : » e yohle ; P , ty y f 74 ei F (epret feral ’ ; 4 : 4 we , ( a Tee iu 9 a id : iene ci bbe ; * j ots { Lipaeth Ma ‘] Vie nae ee | “ 2s eng) ce A, enh. al ; = ts ra. » Ue beroea &. epjet an! i sia ‘Fo 7, bY a ; a ad ' a } ‘ P ? & Miry' ty ; - ‘he = u ' Pals : 7 : , fu, my hots diet a > Gl. : ‘ ps i) 7 F; sy : S 7 as ~ ws =v by P3 , ' : ae . “ a ee y _ s bei in [ae ; Al UL ts aad Tt * ye . ee | Ye hon, od aha r it ay 7 é kas eo 4 ie i) . ot i. 5 TWENTY-FIRST ANNUAL REPORT OF THE FRUIT GROWERS ASSOCIATION OF ONTARIO, LSes oo. To the Hon. Charles Drury, Minister of Agriculture - Srr,—I have the honor of submitting to you the Twenty-first Annual Report of the Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario, in which you will find a carefully prepared report of the important papers and discussions on fruit culture, floriculture and forestry, which were taken up at our Winter Meeting in the City of Hamilton, and our Summer Meeting in the Town of Seaforth. It also contains an account of the Annual Meeting at Windsor, the president’s annual address, and the officers for the year 1890. You will be pleased to find that the plans proposed for the increased usefulness of vur Association are being carried out. Arrangements have been made to send out eleven of our directors to speak at Farmers’ Institutes on the subjects connected with fruit culture and forestry, and it # hoped that in this way this important industry will receive a real encouragement. The Canadian Horticulturist has been enlarged and improved, and during the coming fruit season it is proposed to send out a supplement in the shape of a weekly bulletin, -giving reports of both home and foreign markets. Hoping that our work may receive your hearty approval, I an, Sir, Your obedient servant, L. WOOLVERTON, Secretary. Grimsby, Ont., Dec., 1889. OFFICERS FOR 1890, PRESIDENT : Aa VM Smith oe ee 2c ec. eee bes Sl ies oe oe hb eo ViIcE-PRESIDENT: Se Wie) ne ee eR PS ME SS SECRETARY-TREASURER AND EDITOR: SETS ORLY er bOR IM. Rese 295 0. «Mines uted ant chee unees os ales Sin 8 sja' Grimsby. mrricnimen) Divison Nips 1. eo eres 2. Sie neice ee John Croil, Aultsville, Ont. Agricultural Division No. 2......................P. E. Bucke, Ottawa, Ont. Agricultural Division No. 3 ...D. Nichol, Cataraqui, Ont. Agricultural Division No. 4......................P. ©. Dempsey, Trenton. Agricultural Division No. 5......................Thos. Beall, Lindsay, Ont. Agricultural Division No. 6......................W. E. Wellington, Toronto, Ont. Aarronitaral /Divasion ING. oF oboe io bal Sede ay Be t,o, «2 ieee M. Pettit, Winona, Ont. puonenicural Diviston No. “S..2 6080 6s cma ts cue se A. H. Pettit, Grimsby. pesricn uoral Divisions @,. 95.0. cies wie eo vow ove soo es J. K. McMichael, Waterford, Ont. Agricultural Division No. 10............ .........A. MeD. Allan, Goderich, Ont. Agricultural Division No. 11......................1. H. Race, Mitchell, Ont. Agricultural Division No, 12....2....1:...........N. J. Clinton; Windser7@ne Agricultural Division No. 13. soy sinebien.- oo» GC. Caston, Craigharaeeee AUDITORS: ames: Galdie s «oii fie sin) so via ea o> Lee's Rpg ob tein, be» nc 0 os ee a. MM, Denton... 2 ere des ile so ows rn eek Le ee London. THE ANNUAL MEETING. The annual meeting of the Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario was held in the Music Hall, Windsor, on Tuesday, the 10th December, 1889, at 8 o’clock p.m. The President, A. McD. Allan, occupied the chair. The minutes of the last annual meeting was read by the Secretary, and approved. The Treasurer’s report, duly audited, was read by the Secretary-Treasurer and adopted. On motion of Mr. J. M. Denton, London, seconded by Mr. Thomas Beall, Lindsay, it was resolved that since it is desirable that the Treasurer’s report end on December 1st instead of September Ist, therefore that two auditors he appointed to audit the accounts of the Secretary-Treasurer from September Ist, 1889, to December Ist, 1889. The President then appointed Messrs. Wm. Saunders, of Ottawa, and James Goldie, of Guelph, as auditors for this purpose. The President read his annual address, which received the closest attention. Mr. A. McNeill, Windsor, said that several points in the address should be noticed, for instance, the study of horticulture in our pubiic schools. He thought the Association should express itself in favor of this study being introduced into the schook. The Secretary stated that a letter had been received from the Minister of Education and read at the Hamilton meeting, to the effect that a kook was in preparation for use in the schools which would take up the subjects of both agriculture and horticulture. Mr. N. J. Clinton, Windsor, said that he once attended a school in which a book on agriculture was introduced, but it took the shape of agricultural chemistry. Such a book is too deep for public schools, and would be more suitable in a high school. Mr. T. H. Race, of Mitchell, was of the opinion that the best place in which to teach the children horticulture, was in the garden at home. At one time he was in the habit of giving away the surplus fruit of his garden, but of late he had given his children the ~ privilege of gathering and marketing both fruits and flowers, and sharing the profits. By such means, he thought, the subject could be taught much more effectively than by introducing a text book into our schools, whose list of subjects is already overcrowded. = Se On motion, a committee consisting of A. M. Smith, J. A. Morton and Prof. Saunders * was appointed by the chairman to prepare an obituary notice of the Rev, R. Burnet. Vili. The following resolution was presented by them and was adopted unanimously by the Association. : Resolved, that we the officers and members of the Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario have learned with deep regret of the death of the Rev. R. Burnet, one of the former Presidents of this Association, who during his term of office manifested such zeal in advancing the welfare of our organisation. By his enthusiastic advocacy of the fruit interests of this province, he did much to stimulate fruit culture, while his uniform urbanity and genial bearing in the chair, won him the esteem of all. We tender our sincere sympathies to his widow and family in their bereavement. Resolved, that the Secretary be requested to transmit a copy of the above resolutions to the widow of our Jate lamented President. J. A. MORTON, A. M. SMITH, WM. SAUNDERS. The nominating committee presented their report, recommending the following elections, viz. :— President, A. M. Smith; Vice-President, J. A. Morton; Directors, John Croil, P. E. Bucke, D. Nichol, P. C. Dempsey, Thos. Beall, W. E. Wellington, M. - Pettit, A. H. Pettit, J. K. McMichael, A. McD. Allan, T. H. Race, N. J. Clinton, G. C. Caston ; Auditors, James Goldie, J. M. Denton. After the names had been voted upon seriatum the report was adopted. At a meeting of the Directors, held subsequent to the election, L. Woolverton, of Grimsby, was re-appointed secretary-treasurer and editor of the Canadian Horticulturist. A fruit committee was appointed by the chair, consisting of A. H. Pettit, A. McD. Allan, and W. W. Hillborn. TREASURER’S REPORT FOR THE YEAR 1888-9. RECEIPTS. | $ c EXPENDITURE. | $ Cc. NR RRNA Ha ts fed: a Balance on hand last audit............ 665 04 Plant distributions; . oes eee | 315 08 Mismibers fees ct) 5......c cee awe: ae cies | 2,004 75 || Directors’ meetings, and Farmers’; Advertisements in Journal..........-- 200 44 | Institutes. os a.:6dctis van ase eee | 331 37 Back Nos. and bound vols............. H 18 29 Pixpress/and) dutiy;. 22): +seeeeeeeee 156 19 Government rants. 5... deere tise << 1,800 00 Chromo lithographs............... 267 95 Government allowances for engraving. . | 50 00 Printing and stationery........... 103 30 Sale of stock in Beadie Nursery Co.... .| 75 00 Audit 1887°8.. 60.23, Shoe 20 00 Postage and telegrams............. | 106 36 IR. dR. certificates. G<.. tw.se seed 2 00 Blectrotypess.. ite 0ie eae 117 60 | @GMMISEIONS -...: «. <2. a5. ee H 88 23 Caretaker at annual meeting...... | 3 70 || The Canadian Horticulturist....... 1,445 75 | Stonorrapher svc. 6 +.o eee eee kee 52 25 || Salary secretary-treasurer, editor | i Sn Clerk: Ses oui. eer ees 800 00 | Books and exchanges........... | 19 75 Advertisements of meetings....... 61 7 Balancezoni hand’. § 4:5. sevice 922 20 i| rn $4,813 52 || | $4,813 52 To the President and Directors of the Fruit Growers Association : GENTLEMEN—We, the undersigned auditors, have gone carefully over the Treasurer's account for the year 1888-9, have compared the vouchers with the items of expenditure, TTT lrlrlcclc ll lrlrmwDTvL eee ae and find them correct, showing receipts amounting to $4,813.52, and an expenpiture of $3,891.32, showing a balance in the hands of the Treasurer of $922.20. We desire to express our appreciation of the systematic manner in which the Treasurer had prepared his statement for our inspection, and the uniform courtesy with which he gave every information asked for by your auditors. Jas. GoLpIg, ; i Auditors. NicHoLas AWREY. SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT FROM SEPT. Ist TO DEC. Ist, 1889. REcEIPTS. | 3 c EXPENDITURE. | $ c | | peer September Ist, Balance on hand....... 922 20 | Bl pairoGyes. . cae ps dee A es | 20 25 Members’ fees, September, October and 4 Advertising meetings................ 3 00 MRpEREEER Eee eee FOB he «,. 108 00 || The Canadian Horticulturist.......... 403 94 Advertisements, September, October; | Plantidistribution’ 2.20... 2222.05.02 0. 5 70 SAGMIMOVEMDEL . 3... 2.060 ce cece cs Vo S0:}\ *ussian-exchange: .. . s0kodecahs Sc. 29 00 Back Nos. and bound volumes, Sep- Books and exchanges................. 5 00 tember, October and November ..... I. Conmmissionsa Wae3 lose bes las 12 50 i Ge AMG 5 20a. nod «2 exbsl. 2. Seca 8 20 00 il. Express and 'duty...... 6-22. Sabu 6 77 Postage and telegrams................ , 9 28 Printing and stationery.............. | 23 19 Directors’ expenses............. ed3f 10 30 Salary secretary-treasurer, editor and | Clerks. S35. Moses rs one nee eee 225 00 Stenepraphoer:ysiicy. sah agen coe aia | 105 00 BalancewtnJdiand. 22h o yee oe Ge 231 86 $1,110 79 | - 1,110 79 To the President and Directors of the Fruit Growers’ Association: We, the undersigned committee appointed to audit the receipts and disbursements of the Secretary-Treasurer from the first September to the lst December, 1889, heg to present the following report : ; We have examined the vouchers, compared them with the items of expenditure, and find them correct, showing receipts amounting to $188.59, and an expenditure of $878.93, showing a balance in the hands of the Treasurer on the 4th day of December, of $231.86. Jas. GoLDIE, | Wm. Saunpers. { Auditors. = REPORT ON NEW FRUITS. Me The secretary read a report of New Fruits which had been received by him during the past two seasons as follows: I think it is very important that a careful record be kept by this asssociation of all new fruits that are originated in Ontario, and so soon as any one is found to possess sufficient merit to deserve a place among our older varieties, that some steps be taken to encourage its propagation for the general good. I would be in favor of the appointment of a fruit committee of three practical men, whose experience combined would cover the different varieties of fruits pretty fully, to whom your secretary could send samples of fruits in their season as they are sent into him, and who should report through him to this Association regarding the same. During the last two seasons several new fruits have been sent into me, and in order to present some account of them to you I have prepared this paper. Appies.—Reany’s Seedling is an apple that impressed me rather favorably. It was grown by Mr. S. Reany, a few miles from Port Elgin, who exhibited it at some of the local fairs, where it attracted the attention of Mr. J. H. Wismer, of Port Elgin, and he sent me a sample for my opinion. It is a fall apple of good quality for the table, and may be thus described: Fruit above medium size, almost round. Skin smooth, slightly uneven. Color, rich golden yellow, sprinkled moderately with small grey and light dots. Stalk three-quarters of an inch long, inserted in a funnel-shaped, slightly russetted cavity. Basin abrupt, even. Calyx partially open. Flesh yellow, fine grained, juicy, with sprightly, vinous flavor. Core small. Quality very good to best. Keane's Seedling is a beautiful dessert apple which was figured in the Canadian Horticulturist, Vol. x1, page 284. The original tree grows about four miles north of the town of Orillia, on the farm of Mr. James Keane, and isa chance seedling of about twenty years of age. Mr. T. Williams, of Orillia, who sent the samples to me, says it has borne every year for the last nine years most abundantly. . At first sight this apple has much the general appearance of Gravenstein, but is below average size, and struck me favorably as a commendable autumn dessert apple. It is below medium size, of even form, roundish oblate, with closed calyx in a corrugated basin. The skin is shaded, splashed and striped with bright crimson, which is deepest on the sunny side. The flesh is white, crisp, fine grained, juicy, and of a rich, aromatic flavor. Morse’s Seedling Harvest apple was sent me by Mr. S. P. Morse, of Milton, who says it ripens with the old Early Harvest, averages larger in size, and is perfectly free from leaf blight, or apple scab. The skin is very smooth, with obscure whitish dots; stem, short, stout, and set in an irregular cavity; calyx closed, set in a round regular basin ; flesh, white, tender, juicy, sub-acid. It is an apple that seems to possess especial merit as an early cooking apple. Two seedling apples were reported on by Mr. Wm. Saunders, in the Canadian Horticulturist, Vol. xt, page 13, and I append his description of them. ftobson’s Seedling, grown by Mr. T. C. Robson, Minden, Ont. Size above medium; form, oblate; color, greenish yellow, streaked and splashed with red; stem, slight and short, with a deep smooth cavity; calyx, open; basin, rather deep and slightly ribbed ; flesh, yellowish white, fine-grained and moderately juicy, with a faint aroma and a mild pleasant flavor; core, rather large. +a a aie Xlli. upon, therefore, as unreasonable if we request a higher recognition at the hands of our Government in the best interest of our children, by insisting that the study of agricul- ture and horticulture be placed in the common school curriculum. By the present system our brightest boys are systematically educated away from interest in rural pursuits, so that now the chief industries of Canada lie languishing for the want of intelligent atten- tion by an educated yeomanry, whereas professions of all kinds are crowded to excess, Everything is done to give prominence to the so-called “learned professions,” which in itself is right enough; but why neglect entirely the foundation and backbone of all interests—the arts of agriculture and horticulture? Are they so degraded as to be beneath the ken of educated humanity? Surely it is a feeling long since dead that the tiller of the soil should be recognized as a sort of machine, a clodhopper, a necessary evil, one whose avocation should compel him to hold down the head and remain an outcast from cultivated society. The true aim of education is to fit the pupil for some sphere of use- fulness. A grave responsibility rests upon our legislators for so long neglecting, from an educational point of view, this, the greatest economic science in our country, and until this study is placed, as it should be, prominently in our common school system, justice cannot be complete. The season of 1889 will long be remembered by fruit growers. The unusual and widespread frosts of May, while vine, plant, bush and tree were in bloom, did its work of destruction so thoroughly that in most sections nothing was left to mature into fruit. In some favored sections the blossom was either not far enough advanced to kill, or the fruit formed and so beyond injury from such a degree of frost. Generally speaking the raspberry crop was fairly abundant, but other smali fruits were in most sections less than half a crop. The grape escaped better along the Niagara peninsula, especially that portion between the lake and mountain range, and in the water fronts of Essex, than in any other section. Pears and plums yielded enough to satisfy home demand generally in the western part of the province ; but the apple crop was confined chiefly to the coun- ties of Kent, Essex, Elgin and Lambton. The loss of the apple crop to this province is a large one, but still we find some grains of comfort that we hope may encourage growers to persevere and put forth greater efforts in the future. While we feel the financial loss here, the consumers in foreign markets feel more keenly than we can the loss of this luxury which they have learned to appreciate more and more every year. Prices have advanced materially, and we observe that this season there isa much greater difference on British markets between prices of Canadian apples and the apples of other countries ; that difference being in favor of ours. What fruit has been shipped is better culled and packed than in past years, and as a result our reputation for a genuine article is better. Then, again, there is a change working throughout British markets in favor of the best flavored fruit rather than highly-colored specimens. The Rhode Island Greening that a few years ago had to be sold at a loss, generally on account of color, is now coming into favor. It realises about the same price as the Baldwin this year, with a tendency, I be- lieve, to take its proper place in public esteem several points ahead of the Baldwin; intrinsic worth is sure to come to the front. Is it not reasonable to expect that the codlin moth has been materially diminished by the absence of the apple crop, and that next year we may hope for much less damage by that orchard pest? This must not deter growers, however, from using means to eradicate the pest entirely. Orchards have had in most instances a much needed rest, and if we can arouse growers now to give proper attention to their orchards in the way of cultivation, manuring, trimming and keeping clean, it is reasonable to look forward to a new era in fruit culture. We have an opportunity now, bought dearly it is true, but if wé take advantage of it the results will be most encourag- ing lam sure. To produce clean, large, high-flavored fruit, we must see to it that the soil is kept in good heart, that those substances required to produce such a crop are returned regularly and systematically to the soil. If this is attended to we will succeed ; if not, failure stares us in the face, The carrying companies are still to blame for much of the loss on fruits shipped. We can still charge them with rough handling, lack of proper accommodation, and often much delay in transit. The shipments of last spring bear abundant evidence of this. By Xiv. way of a practical] illustration I will give one ont of many instances coming directly under my own notice. A shipper at London, Ontario, sold two hundred barrels of choice apples to a firm in Covent Garden, London, England. This cargo I carefully inspected both before and after the fruit was packed, and I can testify to the fact that the fruit was - choice in sample and varieties, and in splendid condition for shipping. Every possible precaution was taken, and the most positive instructions given to the Grand Trunk rail- way agent at London, Ontario, as to handling, accommodation and despatch, with a re- quest also that these instructions should be sent forward to the agents of the ship. Mark the result: The goods were nearly a month on the way. I quote the report of the Covent Garden firm, Messrs. Pankhurst & Co. : ‘* When our man arrived at the ship a barge was alongside taking off the steaming dung quite a yard and a-half high on the deck, and immediately over the apples. Of course he knew what to expect, and sure enough when the apples came from below they were half full of juice. It astonishes us that the ship- ping company, in their own interest, are not more particular, as these were too full of water to go into the dock shed, but stood on the quay literally swimming in their own juice. We enclose a copy of claim we sent in to the company ; also their reply.” The claim referred to is made up thus :— LE 88; Cost of apples - * - - - : 80 0 0 Freight on them - - - - - - 3615 0 Dock dues - - - - - - - 26 8 Making a total of - - = LAI9) ees The sales were 110 barrels, sold at 1/0 - - - 5 10 0 30 se $5, 552/6 - - 3/150 10 : IST - S1Onr0 10 eS s3/3 ge 40 ss waste 2 ae Total sales - - My - £12 7 6 Leaving as loss the balance - - £106 14 2 To this claim the Allan Brothers & Co. replied that they could not see why the ships should be held responsible, and could only attribute the loss to natwral decay / It certainly was most natural that the fruit should decay under such circumstances. The Grand Trunk also denied all liability for negligence. Results similar to this are, I regret to know, but too common, especially where fruit goes forward on London boats from Montreal and New York. I am glad to be able to report quite a different state of matters, so far as I have per- sonal experience and have heard the same from others regarding shipments by the Beaver line of steamers. In three ships of this line special apartments, supplied with atmospheric blast, are used for fruit, and I understand they will not carry fruit at all excepting what they can thus accommodate. As a result I have not been able to trace any complaints against this line for bad handling or damaged‘fruit. On the contrary, all reports I have received have been most complimentary, and my own experience fully corroborates these reports, If other companies do not give equally good accommodation, shippers must, in their own interests, seek the channel where they are protected from loss. There is no reason why the other lines should not supply special cold chambers for fruits ; indeed there is no encouragement to widen the orchard area unless such accommodation is supplied liberally. I am sure horticulturists throughout the Dominion will be pleased to know that a con- vention of horticulturists, experts from every province, has been called to meet in Ottawa in February, for the purpose of discussing the present situation, and advising possible means for a more perfect development of our interests. The Dominion Govern- ment has acted generously in appropriating asum of money towards the expenses of this gathering, and a full programme of the subjects for discussion 1s being prepared under the direction of the Minister of Agriculture. I trust a large delegation from this province will be present. It has been my privilege lately to examine a newly-patented fruit package known as the “‘ Kerr Ventilated Barrel,” specimens of which I have requested the owners to have at our meeeting. From a careful examination of this package I feel satisfied it Vie possesses several points of superiority over the ordinary barrel for the shipping of apples. The inventor has evidently followed the generally expressed desire for ventilation, and in this particular has succeeded beyond dispute. Time was when, although it was con- sidered necessary to have perfect ventilation in the apartment where fruit was stored, either at home or in transit to market, it was looked upon as necessary to have the barrels containing such fruit as close as possible. It appears reasonable that if ventilation is valuable in the storing department, it must be equally valuable in the packages them- selves, and experience has borne this out as a fact, providing the fruit is in proper con- dition for shipping at all. It is quite unnatural to confine the fruit from a circulation of pure air, and it cannot but be injurious to the fruit when air is confined in the barrel with it until it becomes foul. It is well-known that if we store fruit in an ice-house or pit it will keep well for a time, but so soon as it is exposed to the air decay sets rapidly in, whereas if such fruit had been stored in a more natural atmosphere it would keep longer and retain flavor more perfectly. With the Kerr barrel a packer cannot hide poor fruit so easily in the middle of the package as the sample can be seen from top to bottom through the openings between staves. It is also said to be lighter than the ordinary apple barrel which might make a slight saving in freight. From the method of construction it can be made any size to suit trade, and the cost will vary according to size. Being made entirely by machinery, I persume it can be placed on the market for something less than the ordinary barrel. ‘The staves can be cut of such thickness as may be necessary to give sufficient strength to avoid material damage by pressure when piled in tiers in a vessel hold. It also seems to me that the damage caused ordinarily by the shunting of cars and running vessel shoots may be largely overcome with this barrel, as there is more “ give” to it than in the ordinary barrel when striking upon the top or bottom edges. I believe a cargo of apples packed in these barrels, shipped in cars and vessel apartments well ven- tilated, should arrive in Britain in a perfect condition, and certainly the British broker could not truthfully return an account of sales classifying any as wet. A purchaser could see the sample fairly well without opening, and would naturally feel greater confidence in purchasing such fruits on sight. As this barrel can be made as easily with or without bilge, I feel anxious to have it tested in all forms, for after all there is nothing so convine- ing as actual test. Members of this association will remember seeing some months ago the prospectus of the “ Empire Produce Co.” enclosed in the Horticultwrist. The object of this com- pany is to act as brokers and commission agents for the growers of fruit and general farm and dairy products, disposing of the same to the legitimate cash buyers who sell direct to consumers both in the markets of Canada and Britain. I think we are all agreed that it is unsatisfactory to consign goods to commission men who are also retail dealers or speculators. Self interests under such circumstances must clash with that of the client. We often hear complaints of bad returns, and insinuations that particular consiguments of fruit must have been turned into the commission men’s own stock instead of being sold in fair and open competition. Working under such a charter as this company has, no such doubts can exist. The company cannot buy a - cent’s worth on its own account. Its books will be audited and always open to prove the bona fides of returns. The precise mode of selling has not yet been decided upon, and I am authorized to ask for advice from this Association on this point, as well as other points that may occur to growers and shippers touching our interests. There is one important reform that this company will endeavor to bring about in time for next season’s business, namely, the earlier daily arrival of fruit for sale in local city markets. It appears that the trade, particularly in Toronto, is greatly inconvenienced by uncertain and late arrival. The co-operation of both growers and dealers is invited to secure suit- able railway and steamboat accommodation, so that goods may reach their destination at an early honr in the day. I desire members of this Association, as well as others in- terested, to speak out now plainly, and by advice to assist in placing this most important branch of trade upon a better footing than it has heretofore been. Personally, I have taken a deep interest in this scheme, believing that it is in the interest of producers, and that therefore it will prove to be a strong factor in advancing our industry by the obtain- XV. ing of prices in accordance with the brands, by assisting to regulate as well as to create brands, and by inspiring more confidence in the growers and shippers here, as well as the dealers and consumers in foreign markets. There is abundant room for such a company to work, also in opening out new markets and introducing into foreign markets fruits that at present are grown only for local markets. 7 Our Provincial Government has materially strengthened our hands by opening a place for our experts at farmer’s institutes, where we are able to reach a class who otherwise paid little if any attention to fruits. If we can succeed in convincing fruit growers, large and small, that it is as necessary to produce the finest samples in order to make money as it is to breed the best animals, or clean thoroughly so as to bring tq market the best sample of grain to command the highest prices, then we will have accom- plished a great end. Probably few, if any, will deny this, but it seems difficult to. get producers schooled up to that point where they will act in everything up to the “ golden rule” in its strictest sense. It is an easy matter for a man dishonestly inclined to” practice a fraud upon his customer by placing poor fruit in the bottom or middle of the package. It also often seems to be a difficult thing for a man who may have a deservedly good name for honesty in general business matters, to attempt to pack apples for fear the finest samples should rise to the top and inferior fruit settle into the heart of the package. But notwithstanding, every drawback advancement is the order of the day in horticul- ural circles. Since our last annual meeting death has removed from our ranks one who often addressed us from the President’s chair ; one whose devotion to practical horticulture was remarkable, and whose enthusiasm was inspiring, in language forcible, pure and practical, stern in gcod principle and Christain worth, and in example becoming his high calling. We mourn our loss in the death of the Rev. Robert Burnet. ALEX. McD. ALLAN. P.'C. DEMPSEY; President 1880-18§2. THE WINTER MEETING. The Winter Meeting of the Ontario Fruit Growers’ Association was held in the Court House, Hamilton, on Wednesday and Thursday, the 20th and 21st of February, 1889. The President, Mr. A. McD. Allan, called the meeting to order about ten o’clock a.m. RUSSIAN FRUIT TREES, WHAT OF THEM? The following paper was contributed to the Winter Meeting, at Hamilton, by Mr. D. W. Beadle, of St. Catharines : Some few years ago the Fruit Growers’ Association of Ontario became convinced that if our brethren of the ‘‘cold north” were ever to enjoy the pleasure of raising their own fruit, they must be supplied with trees much more hardy than those that formed the orchards of Southern Ontario. These had been planted by many who were anxious to have in their more northern homes the fruits that we here enjoy, but their labor ended only in disappointment. Our fruit trees were found to be unable to endure the severe cold of that climate. At the same time our brothers in Quebec, and our cousins in the north-western United States had become convinced of the same truth. The Government of the United States had undertaken to meet this need of their north- western states by importing scions from northern Russia, and this naturally turned attention to that country as a probable source from whence to obtain a race of fruit- bearing trees sufficiently hardy to flourish in our zold northland. Mr. Chas. Gibb, an enthusiastic cultivator of fruits, residing at Abbotsford, Quebec, learning that Professor J. L. Budd, of the Agricultural College of the state of Iowa, intended visiting northern Russia for the purpose of ascertaining whether the fruit trees of that country were likely to supply the want of American north-land settlers, arranged with the professor to accompany him in his Russian tour. After his return, Mr. Gibb very generously com- municated to the officers of this Association the information he had acquired during his visit to Russia ; and they, being convinced that many of the Russian fruits would thrive in our cold sections, at once set about importing from north-eastern Russia those varieties which Messrs. Gibb and Budd had found yielding abundant fruit in a climate that, in both its summer heat and winter’s cold, closely resembled that of our more northern latitudes. From the importations made by our Association and those made by Professor Budd, and likewise the importation made by the United States Government, trees have been propagated and disseminated, and the inquiry now is, what is the result ? Are the Russian fruit trees proving to be what was expected? Do they endure the climate of the cold north-land of America, and do they bear fruit of such quality as to make them desirable ? Unfortunately the planting and care of these trees in Canada has not been con- ducted in such a manner nor for such a length of time as to enable me to point to results in our own northern regions, It becomes necessary, therefore, to draw upon the experi- ments that have been conducted at the stations of northern Iowa, and gather what infor- mation can be gleaned from planters in the Province of Quebec, and in northern Ver- mont just on the border of our sister Province. First, then, let us look at the apples. The limits of such a paper will not admit of an exhaustive examination of the varieties that have been imported, and are being tried in various sections, even if I were competent for the task. I shall only venture to name a few, and chiefly those that give evidence of being worthy of attention from Cana- dian planters. The Duchess of Oldenburg is already well and favorably known. ‘The bare mention of this favorite autumn apple is sufficient. 1 (BG) The Yellow Transparent has also won for itself golden opinions. Mr. Simon Roy, of Berlin, writes to me that he wishes he had planted a dozen trees of it instead of two. Mr. Chas. Gibb speaking of it at a late meeting of the Montreal Horticultural Society, says that he expects it will be largely planted in the Province of Quebec because of the hardiness of the tree, its early and abundant bearing, the even size of the fruit, its fair quality and extreme earliness. At the same meeting Mr. John Craig said it needs no commendation, it is a favorite wherever tried. Dr. Hoskins residing in Northern Ver- mont near latitnde 45, says the tree is productive, the fruit full medium in size, when dead ripe hardly inferior to Early Harvest, and always as smooth and fair as turned ivory. : "The tree of the Hibernal variety is more hardy than the well-known Duchess of Oldenburg. The fruit is large, handsomely colored, ripening late in the autumn, and when grown far enough to the northward will keep until midwinter. In speaking of this apple together with Antonovka, Titovka and other Russian varieties, Mr. A. W. Sias, of Rochester, Minnesota, about latitude 45, says: ‘““We are getting more large and fine fruit at the present time in Minnesota from trees of Russian origin than from all others.” Antonovka is perfectly hardy, has fruited in Northern Wisconsin and is described as resembling a very large Grimes Golden, only more oblong; and when ripe of a light golden color ; ripens there in February and March. : Switzer is more hardy than the Fameuse or Snow apple; the fruit resembles the Snow apple in form and color, is juicy, tender in flesh, sub-acid, an excellent dessert apple. The late Chas. Downing said that it was a valuable fruit Soth for home use and for market. Longfield has been fruited by Mr. Tuttle, of Northern Wisconsin, who says that the finding of this one variety is worth to him all the labor and expense he has had in test- ing Russian apples. Dr. Hoskins, of Vermont, mentions it among the fine dessert apples. It has fruited in my own grounds, for the tree bears young and abundantly. The apples were of good size, prettily colored and of good quality, ripening here in autumn. Borovinka resembles the Duchess of Oldenburg in size, form and coloring, but is finer in flesh, less acid and better as an eating apple. Professor Budd says that the tree is a true Ironclad, and an early and abundant bearer. It ripens about a month later than the Oldenburg. Saccharine has fruited in Iowa, and proved to be a very richly colored apple of medium size, exceedingly sweet and ripening in the latter part of September. Enormous is very large in size, somewhat like the Alexander in form, and covered with red stripes. The tree is very hardy, and Professor Budd says the apple is surpris- ingly good for so large a fruit. I will not weary you with a further description. These will suffice to show you that there is great variety among the Russian apples that have been imported and fruited in America, and that there is among them apples of excellent dessert quality, handsome in appearance, of large size, and extending over a long period in their time of ripening. The Hon. R. P. Speer, Director of the Iowa Experiment Station, had a bearing orchard of 1,500 trees, consisting mainly of Walbridge, Fameuse, Talman Sweet, St. Lawrence and Pewaukee. The winter of 1884—5 ruined it, so that there were no sound trees in it save the Whitney Crab, the Wealthy and the Russian trees. Such is his testimony to hardiness of these trees in an extremely cold and trying climate. Dr. Hoskins of Northern Vermont says that he has over a hundred varieties of Russian apples growing, many of them sixteen years planted, and that one thing has been demonstrated to his satisfaction, and that is that as a class these Russian apple trees are very much more hardy as against the winter’s cold than those previously grown on this continent. Besides this he claims that in productiveness, size, and beauty they are more than a match for those varieties which we have received from Western Europe and those of our seedlings derived from them and quite as large a proportion of them that will rank as of dessert quality. Such is the testimony which we have with regard to the Russian apples, testi- mony from gentlemen whose statements and opinions command respect ; and therefore it seems to me that we are encouraged thereby to extend our planting of these Russian apple trees, in the firm persuasion that out of them we will eventually obtain varieties that will gladden the hearts and homes of the dwellers in our most extreme North-land. Further, it is my conviction that we are also to obtain from this source no mean collection of pears that will thrive at least as far north as latitude 44. Professor Budd states that he found pear trees in Russia growing as street trees where the winters are so severe that the Duchess of Oldenburg will not endure the winter, and where the thermo- meter goes down, down to fifty below zero, and that with but scanty snowfall. Since his return he has imported scions of some of these, and having propagated and disse- minated them, now gives us the results of his experiments. He says that Bessemianka, planted on dry soils and sufficiently deep to protect the tender seedling roots on which we are obliged to graft, is doing well so far north as the 44th parallel ; that the fruit is of medium size, nearly seedless, tender in flesh, juicy, mildly snb-acid, almost buttery, and very satisfactory for dessert use. Ripe in September. Gakovska, he thinks, will be hardy enough to plant as a street tree in North Iowa, having never heard of any injury to the trees by winter’s cold or summer’s heat. The fruit is large and handsome, valuable mainly for cooking, for which use he says it is not excelled. Autumn Bergamont he ranks in hardiness with Bessemianka, says the fruit is small to medium, nearly sweet, very juicy, and good for dessert use. In addition to these the Professor mentions Kriskaya Victorina, and Medviedevka as fine hardy trees that have not yet borne fruit in this country, but which are highly commended by Russian pomologists. The Early Bergamont, Flat Bergamont and Sac- charine he says are fully as hardy as the Wealthy apple. I cannot close without saying a few words about the Russian cherries. For our knowledge of these we are greatly indebted to Professor Budd. Although some of them have fruited with me, yet that fact is no evidence of their being sufficiently hardy either in tree or fruit-bud to be of value in those parts of the country where the Early Rich- mond and English Morello fail. From Professor Budd I learn that young cherry trees which he imported in the spring of 1883 have had very hard usage, having been fully exposed to the recent test summers and winters which literally killed out the trees, young and old, of the grade of hardiness of Early Richmond and English Morello, and have in addition been most uhmercifully cut for scions in autumn and for buds in summer. Yet, notwithstanding this, many of them have proven to be as hardy in tree and fruit bud as the native wild plums, and although during the season of blooming in the spring of 1888, they were visited with severe frosts, yet twenty or more sorts fruited, some of them very heavily. I will name some of the varieties that he mentions, those that seem to me most worthy of our attention. Professor Budd says that Late Amarelle trees from five to six feet in height were, this past season, bending with weight of the fruit ; and that, notwithstan:ing the severe spring frost when in blossom. The fruit is medium to large in size, dark purple when ripe, which was about the 20th July. Shadow Amarelle, so called from the mirror-like reflection from the shining skin, resembles the Late Amarelle in size, quality and season of fruit. The trees were also laden with cherries the past season. __ King’s Amarelle ripens with Early Richmond, has white flesh, juice slightly red when fully ripe, pit very small. Orel is of the Vladimir family, of dwarf habit, coming into bearing when the trees are only from three to four feet high. Fruit larger than Montmorency, nearly black when ripe and very mild sub-acid flavor. I have no doubt but that this will be a valuable sort in our very cold north-land. Bessarabian, fruit large, dark red, firm flesh, very mildly sub-acid when ripe. Tree exceedingly hardy. Professor Badd says the Sklanka tree is as hardy as the Manitoba maple. Fruit large, flesh yellow, firm, very mildly and refreshingly sub-acid, pit very small, season of the Montmorency. These are a few of the varieties which Professor Budd has found to be hardy, pro- ductive, and valuable. He advises that the cherry trees also be planted from four to six inches deeper than they stood in the nursery, because of the tenderness of the maz- zard or mahaleb stocks upon which we are as yet compelled to work them. When thus planted roots will be thrown out above the bud in two or three years, so that if the stock upon which it is worked should perish after that, its loss would not be material. He also advises heading the trees low, experience having been shown that sometimes the trunk will be seriously injured when exposed while the twigs show no discoloration whatever. In the Volga region the cherry is grown altogether in bush form, with several stems, like the currant or gooseberry. For nursery propagation the Professor advises most strongly root grafting the cherry, setting the grafts down to the top bud of the scion so as to favor the early emission of roots from the scion. APPLE GROWING IN ONTARIO. Mr. Beat, of Lindsay, read the following paper: During the past ten years I have frequently endeavored to induce this Association to prepare a list of apple trees suitable for cultivation throughout the central and northern portions of this province. Such a list of varieties, if published in the annual report and corrected from year to year, or from time to time as might be required, thereby carrying with it the sanction and approval of the Fruit Grower’s Association of Ontario, would be regarded by the public generally as a reliable list; something that could be depended on; and would do much towards giving intending purchasers of apple trees that information which is in greater requisi- tion than any other, and hundreds of thousands of dollars might thereby anually be saved which is now paid for unsuitable stock forced on them by the peddlers ; a class of gentry much more remarkable for the amount of ‘‘cheek” they possess, than for their knowledge of pomology—persons who profess to have all knowledge of the subject, but who generally know less what varieties would be suitable to the condition of the soil, climate and situation of any given locality than the intending purchaser. My efforts in this direction were always met by the objection that the labor and expense of preparing such a list was too great for our Association to undertake at present. The necessity and desirability of the work proposed was generally admitted. I was therefore surprised to see in the Canadian Horticulturalist of October last, page 220, that the work which had been for so many years regarded as being too laborious and too expensive to be undertaken by the directorate had at last been completed and published. Now, although it was gratifying to find that the work I had so long advocated had been accomplished at last, I must say that the work as executed did not meet with my approbation, and I venture to assert, sir, that it does not meet your approbation or the approval of any other person in this hall. But, I may be mistaken. I will therefore read the list so that all may judge of its suitability to that portion of Ontario north of Southern Ontario.* « A List of Hardy Apples for the Cold North—For summer: Yellow Transparent, Tetofsky. For autumn: Duchess of Oldenburgh, Alexander, McMahon's White, St. Lawrence, Switzer. For winter: Wealthy, Scott’s Winter, McIntosh Red, Fameuse, Bethel of Vermont.” Let us look for a moment at these varieties separately. For summer: Ist. “ Yellow Transparent.” A new apple, but little known. Spoken favorably of by many; I hope its present reputation may be established after a lengthened trial. 2nd. “ Tetofsky.” The most worthless apple ever introduced for cultivation in this province. For autumn—lst. ‘‘ Duchess of Oldenburgh.” This is one of the best and most . profitable of our early apples. But, is it an autumn variety? I prefer ealling it a summer apple. 2nd. “ Alexander.” Very good. 3rd. ‘“ McMahon’s White.” A new variety owned by Mr. A. L. Hatch, a nurseryman of Ithaca, Wisconsin. This apple *By consulting the article referred to, it will be seen that the list was not intended for Central Ontario, but only for ‘‘ The Cold North,” by which we understand such parts as are subject to a temperature of 40° below zero. The list was prepared by a gentleman of ripe experiences in hardy fruits, Dr. Hoskins of Newport, Vt., and for the section of country for which it is intended we doubt if the list could be improved upon. —Seeretary. was admitted to the trial or second class list of the Wisconsin State Horticultural Society in 1885. It might be interesting to learn what means Dr. Hoskins of Vermont—the gentleman to whom we are indebted for the preparation of this list—took to ascertain the suitability of this variety to Central and Northern Ontario where the soil and the climate are so totally unlike that of Wisconsin.* 4th. “St. Lawrence.” A first class apple, and, one worthy of more extensive cultivation. 5th. “Switzer.” A variety but little known. For winter—lst. ‘‘ Wealthy.” An apple that is, and probably will be, extensively cultivated for some time to come in this province, yet I think it ought not to be classed as a winter variety. It may be kept a little longer than the Fameuse but it loses its flavor earlier. 2nd. ‘‘Scott’s Winter.” A variety but little known in this country. 3rd. “ McIntosh Red.” A good apple where it can be grown, but one that has so many poor qualities when removed from where it originated that it is not likely to be used extensively. 4th. “ Fameuse.” ’ ILLUSTRATIONS. Wim. H. Mills, Esq.,-Prosident. 1868-1869... . 5. son ceate woe oon eeleien cine eee Frontpiece Rev. Robert Burnet, (ob.). President 1869-1880... . co scat rts swale os ee xii P, CO. Dempsey, Esq-, President: 1880-1882 «0... since eee carn aw tak ae 1 Wm. Saunders, Eaq., President: 1832-1886. «oe 6. ae ciesaiepers nin is ein iste ht sae 69 iy i TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO, 1889. PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. TORONTO: PRINTED BY WARWICK & SONS, 68 & 70 FRONT STREET WEST. 1890. ‘- ie: ARTS A nai (i TO) a e >, Sit | ' ; " : 2 i ey: _* i + = a | i it. Ue af ey , tie J 4 s + A SMOCAWU ATL AVIPEARIOA LAW AG O46 Ee : . a) a ; 4 fot ‘i. Bort Oy oe ‘ie eae, Bin ond 24) THOR Be diyiongl aie y BR, UE TABLE ; PAGE, Achroia grisella.........0ssseeeee0- 72 reas LONG. on paige a cals Be ess care mas 5 48 Maneiz, Prot. Louis .': alison. aos - 78 Agriculture and Arts Act, Amendnient COMBE GORA TACO DOR AD Ot Or carter 10, 16 Boris roficollig 10h ssid eens osife se 51 PEMOUIS SAUGIA: Joc ac Pa «eFax s(00 >is,» 35 Bees BGMTIG OH 5) cis'es wie ej hgslejs'n weiss 35 eile RUMI Aly vias ain a nvm: ateine e's 0 35 Aletia argillacea..........000.0+ BA 85 American Association for the Advancement of Science........ 21 American lackey moth.............. 32 “ WATT ES) GUE a ale 2 oo 2 si 49 PRMIMOUH HORAPOLIA . . 65 2 20-5 ein'sc/s oon 64 Annual Address of President........ 2, 21 E Meeting of Associgtion of Economic Entomologists .. ..... 29 Annual Meeting of Entomological So- Biany. GF OTmbariO. .. -)5 ees cee ses 2 Annual Report of Council........... 10 ‘¢ Statement of Secretary-Treas. 12 Anonomeea Jaticlavia ...........064. 52 Ants, caterpillars herded by......... 93 en mawW. GO Geb VIG. OF 6 066k n's 62 wre 90 Apateta Americana. .............00 49 RM PRONTIEL GAIN «<5 9s. wic(o 1s bie, 2 nie't an'ere 49 meionia colonella ..... 5... sce. esse 73 Apple-tree, flat-headed borer........ 58 oe tent caterpillars......... 32, 64 Arhopalus fulminans ............... 56 Arsenical insecticides, effect on honey PERE cnc 2 Oise d eek ed oes Siscnee 87 Arsenites, experiments with ...... 30, 87, 88 Association of Economic Entomolo- Pe eee see cine eee 5, 22, 27, 29 Attelabus bipustulatus.............. 64 Australian bug on orange-trees ...... 3, 9 BeEUSUINIQR FOCUUN ..5 0. sie < Sy w dates es 65 RUS a Sain <1. cys rn sce xcs arate s ci 71 Bethune, Rev. C. J. S., articles by.. 85, 104 Bird murder in France ............. 89 Blackbirds vs. Corn Boll-worms...... 89 Bombycids, notes on ...........%.. 93 eee 104 Le A eo 68 Bowles, G. J., In Memoriam........ 20 ets ABREIAGA 2... cases oe 51 Buttertlies, Bei ats eal hee tt Pay ts Sov mie ow 91 at Laggan, Alta......... 7 ns breeding from egg....... Z cs catching with decoys..... 91 se of Eastern United States. 6 6 of North America........ 6 OF CONTENTS. PAGE. Calloides nobilis .......... RE (ose 57 Calosoma calidum..:............. 2 36 Camberwell-beauty butterfly ........ 45 Canadian Entomologist ...........05 11, 18 Caterpillars herded by ants...... ... 93 sp stopping trains.......... 86. Catocala concumbens............... 50. ur PATER). Spe yc\iie spoke eiste epersaee 50 = WEP ONIB, | a5, am ciate 50 Caulfield, F. B., article by.......... 55, Oephun mteger so. ss nes nee 44 Chionobas Macounii, larva of ....... 19, Chrysobothris dentipes: 32. ccc ee 58 Femorata (10: aias ieee 58 Chrysomela Bigsbyana........-.-..- 52. BPWes .. o.'s sess 52 Cicada septemdecim.......... ie are 62 Cimpox. Amoricans’... 02 ./..6c so eae 43 Clarkson, ¥'., article by .... .< 2.55.4; 935 . Clisiocampa Americana ....... 32, 49, 64, 81 ne BULVALIGR: 22.5 snore 33, 64, 86 Clothes beetle, a new............... 41 WOlAS DIS) BRIS GIS o> 5 +, so uctaises = (sie a asin 54 Colorado potato-beetle.............. 52 Cook, Prof. A. J., article by .:...... 41 Cobaipa: livivera ya. e001 tosses 51 Cotton-worms, loss from ............ 85. Cucumber beetle, remedy for........ 88 Currant saw-fly, the imported ....... 3, 36 Chit WORIGA ie G Ade casos ahha a ete oi 34 a: chrabing' sy.) <2. ssi weth ioe: 35 ce remedies £6F. 2. 6. . se 0.c6.21- 3, 26 Oe TNO! GIARBY 6.5. é ccc njenia cite 3 Denton, S. W., articles by .......... 91 Diabrotica 12-punctata ............. 54 se VIMURUA 26 oan ors 3 sles sree 88 Diceres divaricata. 0.06. 6 ccc ocin 51 Disonycha alternata................ 53. a PUBL GTA oe ys jete soars Se 53 Kepantheria scribonia .............. 48 Hlaphidion villosum................ 60. Election of officers ........... 15, 16, 27, 29 Entomological Club, A. A. A.S..... 21 IRISEEIOTE. POR: 2 oases hash se v2 oe 69 Ephestia interpunctella............. 95 Re kuhniella....... ele teh a ee 96 Bripsalis minuta: .. . 5.0.6. s<00 008s 59 Hanniola hepatica ©... . sss cc. en 70 Niery ground beetle.........:.....- 36 recheeOr. Aga. 42,50 teow cae eee Te Fletcher, J., articles by. 31, 32, 34, 36, 38, 95 Flour-moth, "the Mediterranean: . . 4, 22, 96 Fluted-scale TNSCCb ree ntesios ete ce Sete 9 Pace. Fyles, Rev. T. W., articles by..17, 66, 71, 74 Mraleriiea GECOPAS sii <2 = <2 0s sare = 53 SGallemiavcercana.: i). ~ --lecereieier)- 72, 73 “rallanneets. <2 5: 2... iscioee sate 32, 44 MaaHGS Ie POUIGLY «a i<'--< sine see me = = 02's 71 Goding, Dr. F. W., article by ....... 20 Gothie dart Moth ..: . a5 faces nisiae 35 Graptodera Chalybea ............00- 53 “Grasses injured by Thrips .......... 22 eerie GA. Wh. ArbClO Ds. a cca seers 75 Ellousa BECMER; 20324505 neces ams 3, 35 <') Sdbvasta tri 26st eae 3 Hagen, Dr. H. A., article by........ 101 Harrington, W. H., article by....... 41 Eiseris. Dr Ts Woo mos eee aoe 76 Hatch Experiment Stations ......... 5 Heat, effects of, on insects .......... 17 Hepialidz of the Province of Quebec. 74 Hepialus argenteo-maculatus ........ 74 OG a \ WAEPADHIA Sy oo ce oe eee eee 75 fT wv prapilin aos Vaccscdeceetes 75 ee. thule: 2. fo. dt eee 75 sip pobdsca” equina + 20... cee 2s e eee 67 Holcocera glanduella ............... 65 Hoplis trifasciata is) 2 ooo. ees él ier ly NS Lee ee lee eee ee 4 EIGINO DOU (5.55 eke sae ere ee 68 Soom Ui Co Winery Sa ie cinta ond i 66 Bei hc annie ates oniae ciate, cee: che 67 Hylotrechus colonus...............- 57 Bay pereiicia To 2250.1" See eas sient ae 48 Peerya purchiasl.: 095.2 il 2. : 2-2... 2225 46 Tepper eee ia 46 siinlapponiea. sss soc eta cee ees =< 54 PUMBEAINERO S220. homtcem ae te silat 70 Live stock, creatures affecting ....... 66 Locust carpenter-moth ............. 55 PeCNTIE GANS. 0215". Sek ee ae 51 Mraddalistibyeas +2 s..c0 ys ee. Pe 59 Mediterranean flour-moth........... 4, 95 Bielophagard OVINS 23/60 e te oe oie 68 Miscellaneous notes ............0... 85 Moat, J, A; article by 20.) es 83 Nematus Erichsonii........... 3, 25, 26, 38 a MIDERIUN, Aran toe ee ee » 06 Oak, insects injurious to the ........ 55 (Edemasia concinna................ 49 i SEI es 2 RS fel oe 7,18 ** Macounii, breeding..... 7, 19 lv. Orchestes pallicornis................ 54 2 ralipes ..... .\.': :.«- =n 54 Orgyia leucostigma................. 49, 81 Wechot-ily fb <$.2.. 25. ss denen 68 Pandeletejus hilaris..............-- 59 Papilio tuimas........<7 «x eeeeeeee 38 Parasites, importation of useful...... 9 Phymatodes variabilis ...... Bec - 60 4 Waris :...<..'seceeeee 60 Plum-eurculio, remedy for.......... 88 Practical Entomology, rise of, in Ameriéa’:. . .. <0 se. «asdeoseeee 75 Priophorus zequalis................- 44 Report of Delegate to Royal Society. . 13 = Librarian... .. <3. 4) 200 12 se Montreal Branch ......... 15 Samia, cocropia 42. -2 0s... 0. <. eee 47 Saperds candida... 2.6 s2023 see 52 «Ss naneeste «2 2 oe 22 2.2 56 eS) (Mmuties|: : oss 23 22 te eee 52 Saunders: Insects Injurious to Fruits 104 Daw =ties (00 on Sk, Pe 42 Scelerostoma syngamus............. 71 NErices Seriees <6... {ee ee 51 Seventeen-year Cicada.............. 62 Sheep hotly: : 200 eee 68 Cy POG 24s we SSR. BS. Ae 70 “Sqiek- 3... Se Sse 68 Smerinthus excecatus .............. 46 sf geminatus < «iS. ose 47 Sparrow destruction in Australia ... 90 Species, thoughts on determination of 83 Statistics of loss from insects......... 85 Strawberry saw-fly’.... 22... eee 43 Stomoxys ealcitrans ..............-- 67 Tabanus atratus::...//..5./0ss seen 67 6s bovine : ori scans cena eee 67 “* Tineola/: «+... <2 66, 67 Tape-wormsa ; : : 2.0)..\.!) 2 aeele eee 69 Telea polyphemus...............5+- 47 Thalia univittata: ..:::. 4.32 oueneen 63 Thrips, grass-cating’: .. «220s 2, 8, 22 Tiger swallow-tail butterfly ......... 38 Toenia echinococcus , . |.) 2. een 69 ‘<. poliuim ''.... 7.25 viewteale Bie 69 Trichina spiralis... <-..~ ose «eee 70 Trichiosoma triangulum ..........+- 43 Urographis fasciatus...) ..-..ss- eee 58 Vanessa Antiopa.:.....4<+ sees ema 45 Wheat midge » .. 5.6... e200 cee 9, 26 Wild ‘bees 2. 6. 2-22... sa «a era ere 42 Willows, insects infesting ........... 41 Winter collecting ... 2.2.2.2 eee 31 Wylly, Mra., article by :'... )S.iveae 93 Xylentes robinie ...... 2.2. s00.cdess 49, 55 Zimmerman, Dr. Christian.......... 101 TWENTIETH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Pot LOUGLOAL SOGLETY OF ONTARIO. To the Honorable the Minister of Agriculture : Sir,—I have the honor to submit for your approval the twentieth annual report of the Entomological Society of Ontario, in accordance with the provisions of our Act of Incorporation. The annual meeting of the Suciety was held in the city of Toronto on the 3rd of September, 1889, when the officers for the ensuing year were elected and the necessary business of the Society was transacted. A report of the proceedings, together with the audited statement of finances, is herewith submitted. The President's address and the papers on Economic and General Entomology included in the report, will be found, it is believed, of much interest and value by all who are intelligently engaged in farming or horticulture. The Society's monthly magazine, The Canadian Entomoiogist, has been regularly issued during the past year, and has just completed its twenty-first volume. It continues to maintain its high reputation as a valuable scientific publication and to attract the contributions of the most eminent Entomologists of North America. I have the honor to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, W. E. SAUNDERS, Secretary-Treasurer, ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY. The annual meeting of the Society was held in a lecture room of the new Biological Building of the University of Toronto on Tuesday, September 3rd, 1889. The President, Mr. James Fletcher, of Ottawa, took the chair at 11 o’clock a.m. The following members were present: Mr. E Baynes Reed and Mr. J. M. Denton, London; Mr. "J. Alston Moffatt, Hamilton: Dr. Brodie, Dr. White, Masters O. and W. White, Mr. Gamble Geddes. Mr. A. Blue (Department of Agriculture), Toronto; Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, Port Hope; Mr. W. H. Harrington and Mr. R. Bell, Ottawa : Mr. H. H. Lyman, Montreal; Rev. °T. W. Fyles, Quebec; Rev. W. R. Burman, Winnipeg; Mr. L. O. Howard, Assistant Entomologist, Department of Agriculture, Washington. The minutes of the previous meeting having been printed and circulated among the members, the reading of them was dispensed with, and they were duly confirmed. The President then delivered his annual address in which he referred especially to the chief insect attacks of the year. ANNUAL ADDRESS OF THE PRESIDENT. GENTLEMEN,— lhe present year has been one of great scientific interest in Canada. The event of greatest importance is, of course, the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the participation in which we have just enjoyed. This has given us an opportunity of meeting personally many of the leading Entomologists of the country, who have long been known to all of us through their writings. The late deliberations of the entomological and botanical clubs have been of exceptional interest, and I feel proud that the mem- bers of our society should have taken so active a part in making these meetings successful. Since I last had the honour of addressing you, the ravages of various kinds of injurious insects have demanded our attention. I will briefly draw your attention to some of these, so that there may be some discussion to-day upon the habits of the insects causing them, and thus what have been found to be the best remedies in the experience of those who have investigated them will be brought out. We discussed last year the injuries of the grass-eating thrips (Phl@othrips ‘poapha- gus). Continued observations during the past summer have shown that this insect is very widespread, and that although its attacks occasionally occur on other grasses, they are chiefly confined to June grass (Poa pratensis) early in June, and later in the month, to timothy (Phlewm pratense). This attack is always most severe upon old meadows, and for the present the only remedy we can sug- gest is the ploughing up of those areas and laying them down to some other crop. Oats in central Ontario have been severely attacked by another yellowish species belonging to the Thripide. This insect has been submitted to Mr. Pergande, through the courtesy of the United States’ Entomologist, and declared to be an undescribed species. The injury was perpetrated by the perforation and abortion of the oat flowers just before they left the sheath, by which they turned white, and faded without coming to maturity. Later the insects were found beneath the chaff of the oats, from which they were eating the green matter. In badly infested fields, they could be shaken from the heads of grain in large numbers- The same, or a similar species, was also found in smaller numbers in wheat. Dur- ing the spring, serious complaints were made in all quarters of the injuries by cutworms. Fall wheat was badly attacked by the larve of the glassy cutworm (Hadena devastatriz). This is a dirty white caterpillar with a bright red head, which attacks many kinds of plants, but particularily the different kinds of grasses, upon the roots of which they feed. Owing to the long, cool and damp spring, the season for these injurious caterpillars was very much protracted. Some of the caterpillars of different species being found as late as the end of July. The perfect moths of Hadena devastatriz, H. artica and Agrotis clandestina were very abundant, and flew right through the summer from July to October. As remedies for cutworms I have nothing to add to the suggestions I made last year. Keeping down all weeds in late summer and autumn, and late ploughing in autumn seem to be the best agricultural remedies. Of active remedies, the use of poisoned traps was tried carefully during the past season, and found very successtul, par- ticularly in gardens. These traps consist of loose bundles of any succulent vege- tation, which must be tied together and then dropped into a strong mixture of Paris green and scattered over the land three or four days before the crop is planted out or appears above the ground. This remedy is sometimes condemned owing to the fact that when caterpillars have eaten the piosoned food they burrowed a short distance beneath the ground and died out of sight. Other insects which have been more or less injurious are the root maggots, which attacked onions, radishes and cabbages early in the season. I have received reports of the success- ful treatment of these insects with a solution of hellebore, and I mention it now with a suggestion that it should be tried by our members next spring. The larch saw-fly (Nematus Erwhsonw) was very abundant in the neighbor- hood of Ottawa, and in fresh districts in the Maritime Provinces ; the tamarac swamps being rendered almost leafless for hundreds of acres. The imported currant saw-fly (Wematus ribesii) was a troublesome pest right through the season until after the fruit was ripe. This was largely, I think, due to the unusual season, not only were some individuals of each brood retarded, but the frequent rains washed off the poison applied to the bushes almost as soon as it was put on. During the past summer I had the great advantage of paying a visit to Wash- ington, where I had the pleasure of meeting the entomologists of the Department of Agriculture and examining the working of the division of entomology. During this enjoyable visit I was treated with the greatest courtesy and hospitality. The - magnificent collections were thrown open to me, and the working of the different kinds of machinery for checking the attacks of insects was explained. With regard to the work of this important division of the Department of Agriculture, there are some experiments now being carried on under the direction of the entomologist which are of enormous importance to the country. These have been undertaken with the object of introducing the different parasites of the injurious Australian bug (Jcerya purchasi), which is working such terrible havoc in the orange groves of California. By the latest advices these efforts have been attended with remarkable success, and a small coccinellid beetle has been introduced: which is quickly clearing the orange trees of their pernicious parasites. Should nothing happen to change this state of affairs, this will be one of the most important experiments which has ever yet been tried in economic entomology. The attacks of injurious insects in the United States are of course of great interest to us in Canada, not only on account of our own liability to suffer from the same species, but also from the benefits we derive directly from the labours and experience of the large staff of trained economic entomologists at work in the Union, who immediately investigate any new attack upon its first appearance. Although from time to time there occur serious outbreaks of injurious insects, most of these conform in their main characters to attacks which have already been studied carefully, and for which remedies based upon broad, general principles can be applied. Frequently, however, new pests appear and demand prompt action, but concerning the habits and treatment of which nothing is known. An outbreak of this nature which has not yet been observed in Canada, but which has lately attracted much attention in the agricultural press, is by a small fly, known as the Horn Fly, which is a fly belonging to the Stomoxis group of the - muscidae. The mature insect, which is about half the size of the ordinary house fly, is very troublesome in worrying cattle in the pastures. The name of horn fly has been given to this insect on account of a habit exhibited early in the season of clustering in large numbers, when at rest, upon the horns of cattle, particularly at night. During a recent visit to Washington I had an opportunity of accompany- ing Mr. L. O. Howard upon an expedition into Virginia, to investigate the habits of this insect. We found it in large numbers upon cattle at Calverton, Virginia. The animals were considerably reduced owing to the attacks of their innumerable enemies, which worked their way down between the hairs and sucked their blood. The bite of these flies seems to cause much irritation, for some of the cattle had rubbed themselves against trees or licked themselves where bitten until they had large bare, or even raw spots, in some instances, of several inches in extent. Mr. Howard has succeeded in working out the complete life-history of this insect from the time the egg is laid upon freshly dropped cow-dung to maturity. He finds that the growth from the egg to the perfect insect is very rapid, only twelve days being required for it to pass through all its stages from the time the egg is laid. At page 60 in Vol. IT. of “Insect Life,” an account of the work of this insect is given, with the best remedies. These are: (1) thoroughly liming the droppings in places where cattle preferably stand at night, so as to kill off the larve, or (2) remedies tor the protection of the animals from the attacks of the fly. Three applications for this purpose are suggested. (1) Fish oil and pine-tar with a little sulphur. (2) Tobacco dust when the skin is not broken. (3) Tallow and a small amount of earbolic acid. The last application, it is stated, will have a healing effect where sores have formed. This attack was first noticed on the coast in New Jersey, where it has been studied by Prof. J. B. Smith, who has found the tobacco dust the most successful remedy. From New Jersey the attack has gradually spread through Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland and North Virginia. Another attack by an insect hitherto unknown on this continent, is a serious occurrence in Canada of the Mediterranean flour moth (Ephestia Kiihniella), which was probably introduced from Europe in small numbers some two or three years ago, and being unnoticed has been allowed to increase to such an extent that one large mill has been actually obliged to shut down on account of the caterpillars spinning their webs in the machinery and infesting the produce. This outbreak of a serious pest which has been known to be the cause of much damage in Europe, has caused much apprehension lest it should spread to our large mills, and means are being taken in the city where the mill is located to stamp it out thoroughly. The only literature upon this subject which I have been able to find, is the last valuable report of our esteemed corresponding member, Miss E. A. Ormerod, who details some occurrences of the insect in mills in England. The means there adopted were, to clean and wash the mills as thoroughly as possible, and then to subject every part of them which was accessible to a jet of steam. It was found that when the caterpillars were disturbed they would let themselves down by a silken thread and again return after the disturbance ceased, but that when the disturbance was of a moist nature, the silken thread was not made. The means I have suggested in Canada for stamping out this pest are,to brush down the mill as thoroughly as possible, and then subject every portion to a spraying of kero- sene emulsion or gasoline. This latter is, of course, a very inflammable substance, and great care must be taken in its use; but judging from statements made by those who have used this liquid as an insecticide in similar instances, the results, I believe, should be satisfactory, and if proper care be taken, there should be no danger in its use. Amongst the important aids to the work of the economic entomologist, special notice is demanded by that most useful publication, “ Insect Life,’ which is issued from the division of entomology by the United States’ Department of Agriculture. This magazine is under the able joint editorship of Messrs. C. V. Riley and L. O. Howard, and owes its great utility alike to the skill the editors exhibit in present- ing the information they have to impart to their readers, as to the exceptional opportunities they have for obtaining it from authoritative sources. In this pub- lication we have prompt notice of serious outbreaks of injurious insects wherever they may occur in the United States or Canada, and also suggestions as to the best remedies. We have, too, articles and monographs upon various subjects con- nected with the work of the entomologist. A series of articles upon spraying apparatus gives, in a concise form, much valnable information by which a great deal of useless trouble and expense will be saved to farmers and students experi- menting in the selection and use of these necessary instruments. A subject of particular interest to our members is the lately formed Associa- tion of Economic Entomologists, which was organized during the late meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in this city. The association will, itis hoped, be a means of bringing together at least once a year most of the entomologists who study particularly the practical application of the science, so that they may become acquainted personally with each other, and may hear of the investigations which each is carrying on, to exchange experi- ences and discuss the best methods of work so as to obtain as quickly as possible efficient, simple and cheap remedies for controlling the operations of the many injurious insects whose attacks so materially reduce the revenue of the country. The circumstances which led up to the formation of this association are briefly as follows: While it is true that the investigation of all the natural sciences on this continent has always had a more practical turn than in Europe, this is par- ticularly true of entomological studies, and the literature of American economic - entomology has now become so large as to make a bibliography an urgent necessity. The cause of practical science has lately received a great impulse from the passing, by the United States Congress of the “ Hatch Experiment Stations Act.” This Act provides that an annual sum of $15,000 shall be set aside for each State in the Union for the promotion of agricultural science. By virtue of this Act there have already been organized upwards of 60 government experiment stations in various parts of the Union, and of these no less than 27 have their entomolo- gists. There is no doubt that before long the directors of many of the other stations will see the advisability of appointing entomologists on their staff. The effect of this measure will be, that there will be a large number of trained ento- mologists scattered over a large area, and all working at the same important. problem, of obtaining practical remedies for injurious insects—now whilst these men are all working independently, as a matter of course there must be a great duplication of work, and useless experimentation. The idea was promulgated that if an association were formed, by which economic entomologists would have an opportunity of meeting and discussing matters of mutual interest, that good results must follow. In the January number of “ Insect Life,” an editorial note appeared, asking for the opinion of entomologists upon this matter. Having thought the matter over carefully, I considered it of such importance that I made it the chief subject of my presidential address before the entomological club of the American Association, and begged the members to discuss whether the time were not ripe for the formation of a permanent organization. Asa result of this appeal, the club resolved itself into a special committee and drew up and adopted a con- stitution and elected officers for the current year, as follows: President, Prof. Riley ; Vice-President, Prof. Forbes; and as Secretary, Prof. J. B.Smith. This association is for all who make aspecialty of economic entomology, and as consti- tuted at present, consists of all who hold official positions as entomologists to governments, states or associations, or workers in practical entomology who may have applied for membership and been elected. Several important publications on entomology have appeared during the past year. Mr. Scudder’s magnificent work on the butterflies of the Northern United States and Canada is almost completed. The regularity with which the parts have been delivered to the subscribers upon the day of issue, has been a pleasing feature. The care shown in the preparation of the systematic work, and the large amount of new material given to the scientific world, makes this publication an important landmark in the study of diurnal lepidoptera. With regard to many of the points upon which Mr. Scudder was known to differ from the majority of entomologists, it must be acknowledged that his views have been put forth in an honest, straightforward manner, which has found him many adherents. No question of importance has been shirked or slurred over, but all are treated of fully and fairly, and we have no doubt that when the work is completed, Mr. Scudder will be ready to discuss with all who may wish to do so, any subjects, the clearing up of which will be of use to science. One of the valuable features of this work is the appendix, consisting of an article upon the parasites of butter- flies, The hymenoptera are by Mr. L. O. Howard, Assistant United States Ento- mologist, and the diptera by Dr. Williston. It is not necessary to more than mention the names of these gentlemen to assure the quality of this part of the work. Mr. W. H. Edwards continues to publish his superb “ Butterflies of North America,” and each succeeding part exceeds in value and excellence of the plates those which have preceded it. During the past year Mr. Edwards has continued his studies in breeding butterflies from the egg, with the most remarkable success We trust that he may long be spared to carry on his valuable investigations, and give them to the world through the pages of the “ Butterflies of North America.” it may not be amiss, however, to remind entomologists that this is an extremely costly work to issue, and that the author has had to dispose of his large collections and a number of his books to enable him to continue the publication. I cannot help thinking that it is the duty of every entomologist who can afford to do so, to help this work to the extent of subscribing for it. I have said that Mr. Edwards’s success this year in breeding butterflies has been remarkable. This success has been largely contributed to by a gentleman in Canada, Mr. T. E. Bean, who has been living for some time at Laggan (Alta) in the Rocky Mountains. He is a most energetic collector and successful breeder 7 of insects. During the past summer he has sent to Mr, Edwards and myself the egos of so many butterflies of exceptional rarity, and in such numbers, that I con- sider it no exaggeration to say that he has helped on the study of the preparatory stages of butterflies more than anyone else in Canada. Amongst the rare species ot which eggs were sent by Mr. Bean, I will mention the following: Colas Elis, Colias Christina, Colias Nastes, Colias Interior (2), Parnassius Smantheus, Eneis Jutta and Melitea Anicia. Mr. Bean’s collections in the Rocky Mountains have also added largely to our knowledge of the geographical distribution of many of our insects of various orders. Perhaps one of the most interesting points, scientifically, which has been dis- covered by Mr. Bean, is the positive knowledge that insects of the genus Colias will feed upon plants outside the order leguminosz. I had myself suggested in our last year’s report, from observing Colias Interior in nature, that they might feed upon species of vacciniwm or “blue berry”; but Mr, Bean has discovered that not only is vaccinium myrtifolius the food-plant of Colias Interior, (or a closely allied species), but that Colias Nastes feeds naturally on willow, although it is true it will eat edysarum boreale, a leguminous plant. It eats this, however, apparently without relish, for of 15 young larve which hatched from eggs sent to me by Mr. Bean, only two fed on the Hedysarum, and this only after eating nothing but their egg shells for two days. Another gentleman who has assisted materially in this interesting work of breeding butterflies, is Mr. David Bruce, who has spent the summer in Colorado. He has sent Mr. Edwards eggs of many rare species, and I have myself, at Ottawa larvee bred from eggs that were sent by him inside letters from the mountain tops of Colorado. In our last report I referred to some experiments in breeding H@neis Macouniw. Of several young larvee which hatched trom eggs collected at Nepigon, but one passed successfully through the winter; but this one, by its behaviour, raises a point of considerable interest. The perfect insect occurs at Nepigon in the last week of June, so that the caterpillars would probably pupate about the end of May. The specimen which I carried through the winter was only at that time (the end of May), half an inch in length, and had only moulted twice, once in autumn and once in spring. Full growth was not attained until the end of July, when I had a figure made, through the courtesy of the United States Entomolo- gist, which has appeared in the pages of “ Insect Life,” with an account of the full grown larva. From that time until the present, although the caterpillar eats a little, it is decidedly getting smaller, is paler in colour, and is very sluggish—in fact it has every appearance of going into hibernation. An interesting feature of this life-history, as illustrated in this specimen, is the probability of a second hiber- nation. The only person as far as I know who has succeeded in breeding a species of this genus, is the Rev. T. W. Fyles, of Quebec, who bred @neis Jutta from eggs - laid at Quebec in the beginning of June. The larve passed through all their stages and hibernated full grown, and the perfect butterflies emerged in May of the following year. On the other hand, larve from eggs jaid by the same species at Ottawa only a month later, both with Mr. Scudder at Boston and Mr. Edwards of West Virginia, as well as with me at Ottawa, behaved in exactly the same manner as the larvee of Oe. Macowni from Nepigon, they passed only one moult and then hibernated in the second stage, and had all their growth to make the next year, This was also the case with larve from Rocky Mountain eggs of Jutta sent by Mr. Bean during the pastsummer. This points to a dual habit in the same species, which, if regular, is of great interest, and reminds one of what is known to be the case in the arctic regions where, probably on account of the uncertain climate, many species of genera which normally pass through all their stages in one year, there take two or even more before they arrive at maturity, In the line of economic entomology, several reports, bulletins and papers have appeared since I last had the honour of addressing you, from the United States Entomologist, the State Entomologists of Illinois and New York, and from the various experimental stations and agricultural colleges in the United States. Useful articles upon many insects which occur in Canada, have been issued officially in Indiana, Michigan, Nebraska, Ohio, South Carolina, New Jersey, lowa and Kansas. These sources of information are, of course, of great interest to us, and we must be grateful for the frequent opportunities we have of benefitting from the experience of our friends to the south. Before closing, I wish to bring one other subject under your notice for dis- cussion. I have here some figures which have been executed direct from a photo- graph, which was taken at Ottawa by Mr. H. N. Topley, by the new isochromatic process, sent to New York and engraved by the Moss Engraving Co., and in less than a week the blocks were sent back to Ottawa ready for use. In this way great accuracy is assured without the much larger expense necessary when figures are drawn by an artist and then afterwards engraved. Figures are a great help in placing before our readers an intelligibie idea of the insects we speak of in our reports ; therefore it is an important consideration to get as many as possible, if they can be done accurately. Unluckily for natural history, such artists as Mrs. Comstock, Prof. Riley and his assistants, Miss Sullivan and Dr. Marx, are very scarce; but I am of the opinion that the process I have mentioned will, in a large measure, meet the difficulty under which we labour for the present. And now, gentlemen, I beg to remind you that I have for three years pre- sided over your deliberations. I trust that the influence and utility of the society may have increased during that time. It has been my endeavour to develop particularly the practical aspects of our studies, and I hope I may have succeeded in some measure; but I am strongly of the opinion that three years is long enough for any one person to hold the office of chief executive officer, and as the old adage “a new broom sweeps clean” is as true of entomology as of everything else, I must beg you, for the good of the society, to elect some one else to fill the important office of president for the ensuing year. I thank you all for your con- fidence, assistance and advice during my tenure of office, and beg you to allow me now to retire again to the ranks, where I shall always consider it an honour to work for and do my utmost to keep up the honorable position which has been won by the Entomological Society of Ontario. Your obedient servant, JAMES FLETCHER. A cordial vote of thanks for his able and interesting address was unanimously voted to the president on motion of Dr. Bethune, seconded by Mr. Reed. In the discussion which followed, Dr. Brodie stated that he had foand several cereals injured by thrips ; he discovered what were probably the larvee of thrips feeding under the sheath on culms of grass, but when kept over night no speci- mens were to be found in the morning. Heand Professor Wright had examined the insects and came to the conclusion that they were thrips. The larve were exceedingly difficult to mount for the microscope; if preserved in balsam they soon faded out and became useless, but better results followed the use of glycerine. He was satisfied that there are two broods in the year, the first being early in the season. This year, owing to dry weather, they were very abundant in waste places, and he found about one-half of the timothy destroyed by them. After the rain set in, the injury was very much reduced. Mr. Geddes spoke of some variations in size that he had observed in the common yellow butterfly (Colias philodice), and expressed his opinion that the large specimens fed on clover, and the small on lucerne. Mr. Howard, of Washington, gave an account of the success which has attended the efforts of Dr. Riley and his assistants to introduce parasites of the fluted- scale insect (Icerya purchasi, Maskell), a very destructive creature, in California. This noxious insect has appeared very suddenly in the State, from no one knew where. Experiments were made upon it, and remedies proposed, but the cultivators did not seem to care to make use of them on their plantations. They then set to work to learn its life-history, and soon found that it came from Aus- tralia. They corresponded with Mr. Frazer S. Crawford regarding it. He found the insect in Australia, but it was not at all abundant. They concluded, there- fore, that it was kept in check by parasites. A dipterous parasite was found by Mr. Crawford. Their next proceeding was to send Mr. Koebele to Australia. He found the insect everywhere, and observed that it was very commonly parasitized. He then sent over about 15,000 living specimens of parasites. They were liber- ated at Los Angeles. He also found a lady-bird (Vedalia) feeding on the scale insect, and sent several thousand of them. The result has not been satisfactory with the dipterous parasite, as it breeds too slowly, but one of the species of lady- birds breeds most rapidly, and will no doubt keep the pest within due bounds. As an instance of this, he mentioned that 400 lady-birds were sent to one planter, Colonel Dobbins, in May last; he thought from their satisfactory work that his orchard would be free from the pest by the close of the summer, but he afterwards wrote to say that on the 15th of August there was not one living scale insect left. The experiment had been entirely successful. Mr. Howard also referred to the importation of the parasites in 1883 of the cabbage-butterfly (Pieris rapae). Dr. Bethune gave an account of his attempt to import from England many years ago the parasites of the wheat midge, and of the failure of the effort. Dr. Brodie was strongly of opinion that noxious insects should be fought by means of parasites ; that this was the true scientific method, and that the use of poisons was a grave mistake. He was very much gratified with the account of the methods adopted at Washington, and hoped that they would be developed to the utmost. Mr. Fletcher in reply said that we could not possibly ignore the great value of poisons as remedies against noxious insects; that it was absolutely necessary to use them until we can depend upon-the parasites ; and that even if we had the parasites at work upon our destructive insects, they might at any time be swept away through a mildew or blight, and we should be left at the mercy of the enemy. He had been in correspondence with Mr. Whitehead in England in order to procure the parasites of Diplosis, but unfortunately this ventleman was ill and unable to carry out the project. He had found nearly all the specimens of scale insects Aspidiotus sent to him from British Columbia were parasitized, but had never found one affected in this way in Ontario. Dr. Brodie thought that the farming community could never be brought to adopt scientific methods for the protection of their crops till they had suffered from a sweeping destruction. He referred, as an example, to the ravages of the wheat midge some years ago. In the county of York it wrought so much havoc that 10 the wheat fields were deserted and left to the cattle. A day’s threshing would produce two bushels of midges and no grain. When their crops were all destroyed then they were willing to resort to remedies, chief among which were the employ- ment of “midge-proof wheat” for seed, a judicious rotation of crops, and planting too early or too late to suit the habits of the midge. The introduction of new varieties of wheat was the principal means of getting rid of the pest.. He wished that the farmers might lose all their potatoes, in order that they might be led by this severe lesson to give up the use of Paris green, and adopt scientific means of saving their crops. After some further discussion, in the course of which the value of various poisons, such as arsenical preparations, hellebore, kerosene, ete. in checking insect ravages was insisted upon, the subject dropped. Dr. White exhibited to the meeting some cheap wood-cuts in outline, of botanical subjects that were used in illustration of popular articles in “School Work and Play,” and recommended that something similar should be done in order to popularize entomology. He said that specimens were first photographed upon zinc plates instead of glass, and in this way, by a special process, blocks were pre- pared for the printer at a very trifling expense. The project was heartily approved of, and it was agreed on all sides that much valuable instruction might be dissem- inated in this way. Mr. Burman related his experience of injury to cattle and dogs by flies in the North-west, and asked whether fish-oil would bearemedy. In reply Mr. Fletcher and Mr. Howard stated that fish and other oils and greases were effective both in keeping off the flies and healing the affected parts. The meeting then adjourned till the afternoon. AFTERNOON SESSION. The report of the council, the audited financial statement of the Secretary- Treasurer, and the report of the Librarian were presented and read to the meeting, and, on, motion, were duly discussed and adopted. REPORT OF THE COUNCIL, The Council submit herewith their annual report. The progress of the Society still continues, and the increased membership and the demand for materials for collections, evidences an encouraging activity among the workers in entomological pursuits, and affords good hope of satisfactory results. During the year the Council found it necessary to obtain some alteration in the clauses of the Ontario Agriculture and Arts Act relating tothe Entomological Society. Through the kindness and courtesy of the Hon. the Minister of Agriculture the following amendment to the Act was passed : “Section 67 of the said Act is amended by adding thereto, after sub-section (2), the following: ‘ Provided, however, that the Entomological Society of Ontario 11 shall, at its annual meeting, group into five divisions the Agricultural Divisions enumerated in Schedule A to this Act, and shall elect one person from each of such five Divisions (who shall be a resident of the Division he represents) as directors of the said Society.-” The Canadian Entomologist is still published with regularity and prompt- ness, and maintains its well-earned reputation. As intimated in the report of last year, papers on economic and popular entomology have been published from time to time as opportunity afforded, and it is intended to continue these papers as occasion requires. The library has been well looked after, and further book case accommodation provided. Some 65 volumes have been added during the year, among them may be mentioned the final volumes of the Encyclopedia Britannica and 3 volumes of the Report of the Challenger. Special reference must also be made to the splendid edition of Mr. S. H. Seudder’s “Butterflies of New England and Canada,” of which 10 numbers have at this date been issued and received. In continuance of the work already begun during the previous year, the Council has had the Coleoptera carefully gone over and the drawers repapered and rearranged. In this connection the Council desires to express its recognition of the valu- able services of Mr. J. Alston Moffat, of Hamilton, Ont., who devoted much time and attention to this necessary work. The hearty thanks of the Society are also due to Mr. Moffat, and Mr. J. Joknstone, also of Hamilton, and to other contributors, for many generous donations of fresh specimens for the cabinets of the Society. Through the valuable assistance of Mr. W. H. Harrington, of Ottawa, the Society has been able to issue a revised list of Canadian Coleoptera. Pursuant to established custom a deputation from the Society was sent to attend the meeting of the Entomological Club of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, held at Toronto. The President, Mr. Jas. Fletcher; the Vice-President, Mr. E. Baynes Reed, and the Rev. C. J. 8S. Bethune, the Editor of the Canadian Entomologist, attended the meeting. A report of the proceedings will be published in the columns of the Zntomologist. The Rey. Dr. Bethune was elected Vice-President of the Club. The report of Mr. Lyman, the delegate to the Royal Society, is presented herewith. The accounts have been duly audited and will be submitted as usual. Respectfully submitted on behalf of the Council. W. E. SAUNDERS, Secretary-Treasurer. ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE TREASURER... Recevpts, 1888-9. Membership Hees <7) 0 204). 55 2) ee ce ene oes $239 19 Sales"ol intomologest * P22 hE OLE aememeat Oe 63 19 iPiiscork, Ghee, 33! Lt ee Teen rae 108 05 Mevertisenrents 22'S PON ae eee ee 10 13 Government *srantie yr. Ae een te eee ee A 1,000 00 Interest Soe 8! cot SUS ye, ee eine ee eee | he 5 38 Balance drom: lastsycarsindiegins tis hanes Mee aon 222 46 $1,648 40 Expenditure, 1888-9, Pri GOES Sa Ue RS ae aT $651 27 Report‘and meeting expenses 2) 252.22 See ee 170 81 ilar any: resis the Sg BAS a a ee eee oe 141 56 Cabinet expenses 44 Pein c's 2 Hat cisalsch ele eee 139 90 Expense account (postage, express and stationery) .... 52 32 TRSEIb y Pacis ir eee oe scl euler geome og SO Na ey 80 00 PNSUEAINCC yc eos jcpagsists fe wy ao ee eles me aha aa 35 00 Grants to Editor, Secretary and Librarian............ 175 00 Cork spins, C0e: 265% 1c Arun. 8 es BU tet 5 oe 80 81 Balencee re 38 sc. SP ee CN epee tee aun meee 121 73 $1,648 40 REPORT OF LIBRARIAN AND ACTING CURATOR. T submit herewith my report as Librarian and acting Curator of the Ento- mological Society for the year ending August 31, 1889. The number of volumes now on the catalogue is 1,052, of which 65 were added during the year. The volumes of the Encyclopzedia Britannica have been completed, and the Report of the§Challenger includes to date 20 volumes now in the library. In accordance with the suggestion of the Council a new book case has been procured, and accommodation provided for some years to come. The room has been papered, and the book cases stained, and store cases painted. The books are in good order. The cabinets of Coleoptera have been rearranged and the drawers repapered and much good work done by Mr. J. A. Moffat. The Canadian Entomologist has been regularly issued and mailed. Respectfully submitted. E. BAYNES REED, Librarian. 13 Mr. Moffat called attention to the large amount of work and the great care which Mr. Reed had bestowed upon the library during many years past, and of the excellent position into which it was now brought. He moved that “the thanks of the Society be given to Mr. Reed for his services in the library, and that the Executive Committee be hereby recommended to consider the possibility of shewing in some pecuniary way their recognition of his labours.” Mr. Geddes, in seconding the resolution, which was duly carried, referred in warm terms to Mr. Reed's efficiency and kindness in connection with the library. It was suggested in the discussion that followed, that a catalogue of the books should be prepared, and that by-laws should be framed for the proper regulation of the library and the issue of books to the members of the Society. Mr. Denton said that there were now about eleven hundred volumes in the library, many of them being very rare works on entomology and other depart- ments of science. He thought it most desirable that members out of London should be enabled to know what books there were and under what conditions they might borrow them. Dr. Brodie spoke of the great importance of having a complete catalogue made of all the libraries in Ontario, and said that he considered it a work that might very well be undertaken by the Provincial Government. Mr. Reed thought that we were still in too crude a state to publish a catalogue of the Society’s library, but we might make a beginning by issuing lists of the books in its different departments. It was finally agreed to leave the matter in the hands of the librarian. | Mr. Lyman read his report as delegate to the Royal Society of Canada, and the report of the Mcntreal Branch of the Society. REPORT TO THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA.. As delegate from the Entomological Society of Ontario, it is again my duty to submit a brief report of the work of the Society during the past year, and I have much pleasure in saying that the Society continues to prosper under the fostering care of the Government of Ontario. The monthly journal of the Society, the Canadian Entomologist, under the able editorship of the Rev. Dr. Bethune, of Port Hope, first claims attention on account of the important position which it holds among the scientific publications of the continent. The volume for 1888, which is the twentieth volume, consists of 240 pages of reading matter, the contributors numbering 33, and many of the articles being of much interest. In addition to those by our own Canadian members, there were articles sent in from active workersin 14 States of the American Union, from Florida in the south to Michigan in the north, and from Massachusetts in the east to California in the west. : Among the most important papers published in the volume were a number on the preparatory stages of the various insects, including the complete life histories of twelve species of lepidoptera, besides partial descriptions of those of several others. The volume also contains the descriptions of four new genera and fifty-six new species of various orders. 14 In the 21st volume now publishing, there is appearing a series of papers upon “ Popular and Economic Entomology,” which the Council believe will be of value to the fruit growers, farmers and gardeners of the country. The annual report of the Society to the Minister of Agriculture of Ontario, for 1888, has been published, and contains, in addition to the usual report of the . annual meeting of the Society, many interesting papers. One of the most im- portant of these is the account by our President, Mr. Fletcher, of his last year’s trip to Nepigon, whither he went for a week at the beginning of July, accom- panied by Mr. 8. H. Scudder, an associate member of the Society, and one of the most eminent entomologists of America, for the express purpose of obtaining the eggs of various species of butterflies. The expedition was very successful, eggs being obtained from no less than seventeen species and varieties. At the annual meeting of the Society it was found that the finances were in such a satisfactory state as to render possible the voting of the handsome sum of $200 to the library fund for the purchase of books and the binding of periodicals and pamphlets. The library now contains upwards of a thousand volumes, chiefly on ento- mology, but also many on the other departments of Zoology and on Botany. An important move has recently been made in opening the rooms of the Society to visitors at regular stated times in order to popularize the work of the Society as much as possible. The Society's collections of coleoptera and lepidoptera have been carefully rearranged during the year by Mr. J. Alston Moffat, of Hamilton, a member of the Council, and now form standard reference collections of these insects of Ontario. The Montreal branch, I am happy to say, continues in active existence, Regular monthly meetings are held, and increased interest is being taken in the study of this science. During the past year great activity has also been shown by many of the associate members of the Society,and several very important and useful works have been issued by them. The most important of these is Mr. Scudder’s sumptuous work on “ The Butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada, with special reference to New England,” the first part of which was issued on November Ist, and will be completed during the year. Mr. W. H. Edwards is also carrying on his magnificent work on the “ Butter- flies of North America.” Three parts, containing nine beautiful plates, were issued during last year. Several works of a very different scope from either of the above, but still very useful, and issued at a moderate price, have been published by other associate members of our society during the past year. Among these, special mention should be made of “ Entomology for beginners, for the use of young folks, fruit-growers, farmers and gardeners,” by Dr. A. 8. Packard, and “An Introduction to Entomology,” part I, by Prof. J. H. Com- stock. A second edition of Mr. William Saunders’ important work on “ Insects injurious to fruits” has also been issued. H. H. LYMAN, Delegate. ~ hd MONTREAL BRANCH OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO. The sixteenth annual meeting of the Montreal Branch was held on May 15th 1889, at 8 o'clock, p.m. The President read the following report of the Council for the year :— SIXTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE MONTREAL RRANCH OF THE ENTOMO- LOGICAL SOCIETY OF ONTARIO. The Council in submitting their report for the year 1888-89, have much pleasure in recording a decided improvement in the condition of the Branch since the last annual meeting. During the year eight meeting have been held at which the following papers were read :— 1. List of Butterflies taken at Cap a l’Aigle, P. Q—E. C. Trenholme. 2. The Butterflies of Northern British America.—H. H. Lyman. 3. Notes on the forms of Lycwna pseudargiolus found at Montreal.—E. C. Trenholme. 4. Historical Sketch of the Montreal Branch——H. H. Lyman. 5. Notes on Hipparchia or Satyrus.—H. H. Lyman. The members had the pleasure of the attendance of the President of the parent society at the March meeting, at which an interesting discussion on the species of the genus Pamphila took place. During the year one member, Mr. Albert Holden, has resigned. The President of the Branch had the honour of being elected the Society’s delegate to the Royal Society of Canada, and attended the meeting of that dis- tinguished body on May 7th of the present year. In conclusion the Council would again urge the members to greater activity in the study of the science ; not to be merely collectors of these beautiful forms, but to study their habits and life-histories, as much still remains to be done in this department and the work, though requiring patient care, is most interesting. Submitted on behalf of the Council. H. H. LYMAN, President. The Secretary-Treasurer submitted the financial report. The reports having been adopted, the following officers were elected for the ensuing year :—President, H. H. Lyman; Vice-President, F. B. Caulfield; Secre- tary-Treasurer, E. C. Trenholme; Council, J. F. Haussen, A. F. Winn. The President showed specimens of Cenonympha ampelos, Nisoniades pro- pertius, Pamphila agricola, and Halisidota sobrina, from Victoria, B. C. Lycena neglecta (pupa) from Vancouver Island, and Memeophila Selwynii from Nepigon. Mr. Winn reported that Pieris napi oleracea had been taken in some num- bers during the spring and Brephos infans seen. E. C. TREN HOLME, Secretary-Treasurer 16 Mr. Reed in reply to an enquiry gave an account of what had been done during the past year with regard to the Society’s rooms and collections ; he stated that they had frequently been opened to the public, and that many very plesant even- ings had been spent among the microscopes, books and cabinets. DIVISION GROUPS. Mr. Reed drew the attention of the meeting to the changes in “ The Agricul- ture and Arts Act” affecting the Society made during the last session of the Ontario Legislature, and moved, seconded by Dr. Bethune, “That in accordance with the provisions of section 67 of the Agriculture and Arts Act as amended in 1889, the agricultural divisions in Schedule A of the said Act be grouped into the . following five divisions for the purpose of electing one person from each of such five divisions (who shall be a resident of the district he represents) as directors of the Entomological Society of Ontario :— Division 1 to comprise Agricultural Divisions 1, 2, 3. € ce “ 9 ‘ “ 4,, 5, 13. “ 3 “ « « 6, 10. “ 4 “c “ “ ie 8, 9. cc 5 “ “ “ 1% ib” and,that this grouping of the divisions be in force until otherwise altered or re arranged at any annual meeting of the Society.’—Carried. ELECTION OF OFFICERS. The following gentlemen were elected officers for the ensuing year :— President, Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, M. A., D.C.L., Port Hope; Vice-President, E. Baynes Reed, London ; Secretary-Treasurer, W. E. Saunders, London ; Libra- rian, E. Baynes Reed, London; Curator, Rowland Hill, London ; Directors, Division 1.—W. H. Harrington, Ottawa. < 2.—J. D. Evans, Sudbury. “ 3.—Gamble Geddes, Toronto. a 4 —J. Alston Moffat; Hamilton. Ms 5.—J. M. Denton, London. Editor of the Canadian Entomologist, Rev Dr. Bethune, Port Hope; Editing Committee, James Fletcher, Ottawa; J. M. Denton, London; Rev. T. W. Fyles, Quebec; Dr. Brodie, Toronto; Delegate to the Royal Society of Canada, H. H. Lyman, Montreal ; Auditors, J. M. Denton and E. B. Reed. LEPIDOPTERA AND NOMENCLATURE. Mr. Moffat, who has been engaged for some time past in rearranging the Society’s collections, spoke of the desirability of printing a new list of lepidoptera for labelling purposes. / Dr. Bethune said that he did not think it advisable to do so just now as the nomenclature of the order must be considered to be in a somewhat transition state; he thought that after Mr. Scudder’s magnificent work on the butterflies was completed, and students had time to master its contents, there would be 17 ‘avery general adoption of many, at any rate, of his generic titles, and that this would alter very much our current nomenclature. He also referred to Prof. J. B. Smith’s contemplated monograph of the Noctuidae, the frequent descriptions of new species by Mr. Hulst and others, and the work of Prof. Fernald among the Micros, as rendering the publication of a list premature at present. He said that he had in his possession a new check-list of the Noctuide by Mr. Grote, but its publication was deemed unwise owing to the foregoing considerations. He thought that Mr. Moffat’s object could be met by printing a few sheets to supplement the lists published a few years ago by Dr. Brodie and Dr. White. _ GALL INSECTS. Dr. Brodie gave a very interesting account of his studies and investigations of the habits and life-history of gall insects, to which he has devoted much time and labour for many years past. EFFECTS OF HEAT UPON INSECT LIFE. BY THE REV. THOMAS W. FYLES, SOUTH QUEBEC. The Rev. T. W. Fyles read a paper on the “ Effects of Heat upon Insect Life.” Our attention has been drawn by that accurate observer, Mr. W. H. Edwards, and others, to the effects of cold in retarding the developement of insects from stage to stage of their existence. The effects of heat in hastening their changes are no less remarkable. Last autumn I found caterpilars of Amphion nessus upon Virginia creeper (Ampelopsis quinquefolia). They were full fed; and I placed them (for the time being, as I thought) in a glass jar, partly filled with fresh earth that had been carefully examined, and containing oak leaves in which some, to me, unknown larvee were mining. These latter I hoped to raise. Failing in my efforts, I placed the jar on a shelf in my study, quite forgetting the Nessus caterpillars. On the last day of December my attention was arrested by the rustling of the dry oak leaves in the jar. On examination I found a newly developed imago of Nessus ; and a further search revealed a second crippled and dead. My room had been kept at an equal temperature—the fire having been maintained night and day. On the first of January, in the same room, a specimen of Papilio asterias presented itself. A ncighbour’s son had brought the chrysalis some months before and, to please him, I had fastened it by its silken attachment to the window frame’ No doubt many butterflies that present themselves at times in the winter are hibernating species ; but this instance shews that summer forms may be developed untimely by heat. Pieris rapwis often seen in houses in mid winter, the chrysa- lids having remained unnoticed in neglected corners. Those who have had much experience in raising insects will no doubt have observed, that, in instances of species that spend the winter in the ego, the warmth of the house sometimes causes the egos to hatch before the leaves of the proper food plant have appeared. — I have often had to open the leaf buds, and to place in them, by means of a camel’s hair pencil, the newly hatched larve, that they might feed upon the undeveloped leaflets. Through this expedient they have been supported till the foliage was more advanced. 2 (EN.) 18 The invigorating effects of warmth upon hibernating insects have often been noticed. In “England, in sheltered woodland nooks, on unusually bright days, even as late as November, I have seen Grapta comma disporting itself. We had some remarkably fine weather in Quebec province early in the present year, and, on the 5th of April, I captured at Magog a female specimen of Grapta J-albwm. I brought it alive to Quebec hoping to obtain egos from it; but, after keeping it for some time, I came to the conclusion that it had not been fertilized. Mr. Caul- field, mentions, in Can. Ent. Vol. I1X., page 40, that he saw a pair of this species im coitu as late as April 26th. In parts of the country where the land lies open to the south for any con- siderable distance, and where warm winds prevail, insect forms are found far from their usual habitats. From Chateauguay near the valley of Lake Champlain and the Hudson, Mr. Jack has recorded the capture of Papilio chresphontes and Eup- toieta Claudia (Can. Ent. Vol. XIV, p. 219). And in the Niagara district, near the extremity of the broad Mississippi valley, many southern insects have been taken. Hitherto we have noticed the effects of heat in hastening the development of immature insects and in invigorating those that have reached perfection; but we must not forget to notice that heat intensified soon becomes fatal to insect life. The 22nd of March of the present year was unusually bright and warm, though the snow still covered the ground. I was on a visit at Melbourne, Province of Quebec. Tempted by the warmth, I took a chair and sat in the sunshine on the verandah of the house at which I was staying. Looking up, I saw in the shadow of the roof a number of water flies of the species Perla nivicola (Fitch). Presently one of these fluttered down, and alit in the glare of the sunshine. In a moment or two it exhibited signs of the utmost distress. It hurried hither and thither, whirled around as if seized with vertigo, then curled up, and died. Soon another of the insects descended, and, after vainly endeavouring to find shelter in a crevice, succumbed in the same way. I looked round and found a number of the dead flies, all lying where the sun struck with greatest power. The circumstance reminded me of the occasion of my first acquaintance with Nematus Ericksonit in its perfect state. In i883 I had seen the larve in great num- bers in the border townships Bury, Lingwick, etc. In 1884, on an intensely hot summer’s day, I was crossing to Quebec in the Levis ferry-boat. The deck was like the floor of an oven ; and scattered over it were numbers of the saw-flies. Migrating and weary, they had been tempted to alight, and had been overpowered by the heat, and literally roasted. Weall know that, on bright ‘“‘field-days,” the morning before the sun has gained its strength, and the afternoon, when it is on the decline, are the times for finding diurnal insects on the wing. They seem to avoid exposure to the sun in its meridian splendour. [ have been testing the degree of heat that the potato beetle Doryphora decem-lineata can bear; and I find that water heated to 114° (96 degrees below boiling point) will kill them. Boreal forms of jntoe life are met with in isolated spots in which the climatic influences are exceptional. For instance, Chionobas semidea is found on the summit of Mount Washington and nowhere else in a radius of many hundred miles. Mr. Scudder has given us valuable information concerning the effects of heat upon Semidea. He tells us that the insect “‘ cannot bear transportation so much as 3,000 feet vertically to the base of the steeper slopes, at least if this transportation is effected in a rapid manner.” In a swamp, not far from Quebec, near the point where the great northern plateau begins to recede from the river, C. Jutta may be met with. There are similar swamps on the south side of the St. Lawrence; but I have never heard that Jutta has been found in them. 19 Chionobas Macounii, it would seem, cannot bear the degree of temperature that Jutta may be safely exposed to. Mr. Fletcher sent me eggs of the species, and they hatched, but I lost the larva after the second moult. The weather at Quebec was, I presume, too mild for them. However, the larvz seemed to have survived longer with me than with others, so I give my notes upon them. And here I would observe that the notes of Mr. Beutenmiiller upon the young larva, in the Canadian Entomologist for August last, agree with my description of it after the first moult. The first moult probably escaped Mr. Beutenmiiller’s observation. Notes on OnionospaAs Macounit. Newly Hatched Larva.—One-tenth inch long. Head, large, honey-yellow, indented, marked transversely with two rows of light brown spots. Several dark brown warts on each side of the head. ody, bluish white ; dorsal, sub-dorsal, side, and spiracular lines dark-amber. Two dots of the same colour, one on each side of the dorsal line, in each segment. Anal projections. Spzracles, dark amber. Legs, semi-transparent. Moulted August 13th. Larva after 1st Moult.—Two-tenths of an inch long. Head whitish, indented, having six longitudinal rows of pale brown dots. ody cream-white ; dorsal and sub- dorsal lines cinnamon ; side lines brown ; spiracular line pale cinnamon ; spiracles black. Moulted September 3rd. Larva after 2nd Moult.—Length one-quarter of an inch. Head indented, whitish with a faint purple tinge, retains the six longitudinal rows of brown dots. Six black warts on each side. ody cream-coloured; dorsal line amber, then at both sides at intervals a chocolate line, an amber line, and again a chocolate line. Spiracular line a lighter shade of chocolate. A similar line just above the legs. Spiracles black, the first and last on each side larger than the rest. After this moult the insect became sluggish, refused to eat, and gradually withered away. Doubtless many interesting particulars of the effects of heat upon the insect life might be accumulated if entomologists would record their observations in regard to them. Mr. Harrington thought that the difference of atmospheric pressure had a good deal of effect upon insects brought down from high altitudes to the lower levels, as well as the change of temperature. As an instance of the fatal effects of extreme heat, he mentioned that he had found the snout beetles Pissodes strobi and Conotrachelus nenwphar in quantities upon a zine roof at Ottawa in summer, and that when the sun got round to them they were usually all killed by the heat of its rays; he had found as much as a quart of these beetles in a corner of the roof from this cause. Mr. Fletcher mentioned that he had had some caterpillars of Chionobas Macownw which had attained their full growth. They were reared from eggs obtained last year at Nepigon (a full account of the expedition in search of these eggs is given in the Annual Report for 1888, page 85). The caterpillars hibernated in their second stage, passing the winter out of doors on sedges entirely without protection. In the early part of the winter the cold was very severe and the thermometer fell to 20° below zero ; afterwards the caterpillars were covered with about four feet of snow. The Rey. W. A. Burman, of Winnipeg, was elected a member of the Society. After spending some time in the examination and discussion of various speci- mens brought by members, the meeting adjourned to meet again next year in London, Ontario. 20 In Memoriam: GEorGE JoHN BowWLEs. By F. W. Goding, M.D. The recent death of Mr. Bowles has called forth expressions of regret from every quarter, and is considered by all who were so fortunate as to name him among their friends as a national loss. The Council of the Ontario Entomological Society, referring to his death, said : “ They have to deplore the loss they have recently sustained by the lamented death of their colleague, Mr. G. J. Bowles, of Montreal, who was for many years an active and zealous member of the Society, an able and efficient worker, and a valued contributor to the magazine and annual reports.” [ George John Bowles was born in Quebec, June 14th, 1837, and was the eldest son of Mr. John Bowles, a tradesmen of that city, and his wife Margaret Cochrane; a worthy couple still living at a ripe age at Brighton, Ontario. In 1844 the family removed to Three Rivers, in the Province of Quebec, where they resided for seven years, returning to Quebecin 1851. During this period George received his only school education, finishing it by a course of study at the Three Rivers academy. Soon after returning to Quebec he began to earn his own living by entering the Quebec Provident and Savings Bank as clerk, a situation he held for nineteen years, rising at last to the post of assistant cashier. In the early part of this period the advantages of a collegiate education were not available in Quebec for residents, the Morin College being not then in existence, and although the boy’s inclinations always lay in that direction, they could not be gratified. He was a great reader, however, and by dint of application amassed an amount of information, Biblical, historical and scientific, which was a “ well of pleasure ” to him ever afterward. His short business hours, and a residence for several years some miles from the city, greatly favored his love of nature ; rambles through the woods in the vicinity soon made him acquainted with the birds, insects and plants to be found there, “and a walk of five miles, almost daily, to town through charming scenery of the old city of Quebec, was a pleasant task.” In 1863 Mr. Bowles began to direct his attention more particularly to entomology. At that time Mr. Wm. Couper, a well-known Canadian naturalist, lived in Quebec, and to him Mr. Bowles came for assistance, which was cheerfully given him at all times. The capture of a specimen of Pieris rapae then lately introduced from Europe and beginning to be abundant about him, was one of the causes which induced him to take up entomology as a specialty. His first contribution to scientific literature was on this subject, and was published the following year. But his scientific studies were directed chiefly by Prof. Wm. Saunders, who gave him every help throughout his ento- mological eareer. His spare time between the years 1863 and 1872 was spent in collect- ing the Lepidoptera of the vicinity of Quebee, and studying the injurious insects of that locality, publishing carefully prepared papers, chiefly in the Canadian Entomologist, the Canadian Naturalist and Geologist, and the Montreal Horticultural Society’s reports. In 1872 Mr. Bowles removed to Montreal to become secretary-treasurer of the British American Bank-note Company, a position he held till his death. Although engaged continuously for more then twenty-five years in business affairs of a most exact- ing nature, he studied during his leisure hours the insects of his native Province of Quebec, and endeavored to advance and popularize our knowledge of them. That he was eminently successful is well-known to all interested in the agriculture of Canada. The principal part of his work was done by private correspondence, which, if collected and published, would be a fitting monument to his industry. He was for several years president of the Montreal branch of this Society, holding that position at the time of his death. He was an honored member of the following :— Montreal Natural History Society, Montreal Microscopical Society, American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the New York Entomological Society, to whose meetings he contributed occasional papers. Mr. Bowles was married in 1861 to Miss Elizabeth Patterson, orphan daughter o 21 an officer in the British Army, and has left a son and two daughters. His large entomo- logical cabinet representing all orders of insects, has been transferred to the museum of the McGill University. Mr. Bowles was inclined to be quiet and unassuming in his habits and manners ; he was always a diligent student and{an honest observer. In a letter to the writer he said : “My life has been so uneventful that there is but little of interest in it. It has been filled, however, with steady, quiet work.” PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL CLUB OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. For the first time in its history the American Association held its annual meeting in this Province, and assembled in the University Buildings, Toronto, on the 28th of August, 1889. The Entemological Club began its regular sessions in the afternoon of that day in the rooms of the new Biological Department of the Toronto University. There were present during the meetings :—Rev. OC. J. 8. Bethune, Port Hope; W. A. Bowman, Dr. T. J. B. Burgess, Hamilton ; Prof. A. J. Cook, Agricultural College, Mich. ; B. E. Fernow, Washington, D.C.; J. Fletcher, Ottawa; H. Garman, Lexington, Ky.; C. W. Hargill, Oxford, Ohio ; L. O. Howard, Washington, D.O.; Dr. Hoy, Racine, Wis.; H. H. Lyman, Montreal; J. J. Mackenzie, Toronto; Prof. W. Saunders, Ottawa; Prof. J. B. Smith, New Brunswick, N.J.: E. P. Thompson, Beaver Falls, Pa.; Clarence M. Weed, Columbus, Ohio; Rev. L. C. Wurtele, Acton Vale, P.Q. The meeting was called to order by the President, Mr. James Fletcher, who then delivered the following annual address :— ANNUAL ADDRESS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE ENTOMOLOGIOAL CLUB OF THE A. A. A.S8., 1889. GENTLEMEN.— Another year has rolled by since we held our last pleasant meeting in the city of Cleveland. It is with much pleasure that I recognise here to-day the faces of several of those who helped to make that meeting so successful, and, as gratitude has been satirically described as ‘‘a keen appreciation of further favours to come,” I feel grateful to such of you for being present at this meeting, the success of which, to a certain extent, your presence assures ; but for which I, as presiding officer, shall be held largely responsible. With the help of our Secretary I have endeavored to arrange the papers to be read so as ta save as much time as possible, and at the same time to make the most of the papers. Itis a time-honoured custom that the President should give an address at the opening of the annual session, I therefore bow to the decree of fate, and shall endeavor for a short time to lay before you some subjects which it has occurred to me are worthy of consideration by the members of the club. Inaugural addresses generally take the form either of a prospective or retrospective view of the matters with which the society before which they are delivered particularly concerns itself; or, on the other hand, they are devoted to the elaboration of some one special subject. I purpose following the former of these courses to-day, and shall briefly remind you of some of the most remarkable occurrences affecting entomologists which have taken place during the period which has elapsed since we last met, and I shall also endeavor to direct your attention to one special matter connected with the future of the science which it seems to me can be discussed to advantage during the present meeting. When last year you conferred upon me what I felt was the too great honour of electing me, the first Canadian, to fill the chair of the Entomologists’ Olub, I accepted that position as tendered to the President of the Entomological Society of Ontario, in recog- nition of the good work which has been done by that Society, which I, on that occasion, together with Dr. Bethune, had the honour of representing as delegate. 22 The chief attacks by insects upon cultivated crops which have demanded the attention of entomologists during the past season are the following :—In all parts of Canada and the United States the noctuid larvae known under the name of ‘‘Cutworms” were extremely abundant in the spring. In the Maritime Provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, as well as Quebec, the Tent Caterpillar did much injury to orchard and forest trees. In Central Ontario Meromyza Americana was unusually abundant, but it was also accompanied by its parasite Celinius Meromyze. Not only were certain kinds of wheat and barley severely attacked, but also a single instance of the attack on oats was observed, and I made the further unpleasant discovery that the species bred freely in various wild grasses, chiefly of the Genera Agropyrum, Deschampsia, Elymus and Poa. Upon the experimental grass patches of the Experimental Farm at Ottawa the species of Agropyrum and Elymus and Poa Serotina were the grasses most attacked, while only a single instance of injury to Setaria viridis was noticed. An interesting point was that while Poa Serotina was so severely injured, Poa pratensis, Poa caesia and Poa compressa were almost exempt. The species of Elymus and Deschampsia were attacked in the young shoots close to the root, but the others mentioned in the top joint of the flowering stems, by which the appearance known as “Silvertop” was produced. The name ‘‘ Silvertop” is also applied to the results of the ravages of Phlcothrips poaphagus, which is now becoming a “first-class pest” in many parts of Canada. The grasses which suffer most from this insect are, early in June, Poa pratensis, and, later in the month, Phleuwm pratense. A much more serious matter, however, was a new injury to oats by a species of Thrips, which has been found to be an undescribed species. This insect attacks the flowers of oats just before they leave the sheath, in consequence of which they turn white and die. An outbreak which may prove to be one of great importance is the appearance during the past summer, in one of our Canadian towns, of large numbers of the European Flour Moth (Zphestia kuhniella). Radical measures have, however, been taken by the Provincial Government for its suppression, and I trust that it may be stamped out before it spreads to other centres of the milling industry. In the United States the attacks of most interest were the following :—The appear- ance in very large numbers of the Grain Aphis, Siphonophora avene, in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois drew forth many notices in the public press. Perhaps next in importance was the outbreak of an imported fly of the genus Hematobia which has increased so as to become a serious pest to cattle. It has occurred in injurious numbers in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland and Virginia. Its life history has been studied by the entomologists at Washington and Prof. J. B. Smith in New Jersey. The salient points are already discovered and successful remedies have been made known. The Army Worm (L. wnipuncta) has done restricted damage in Indiana and has also occurred in Florida. Brood viii. of Cicada septendecim has appeared in Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky, Maryland, North Virginia and North Carolina. The Chinch Bug (Blyssus leucopterus) has been abundant in Missouri during the past summer and (Phorodon humuli) is reported as more abundant in New York this summer than it has been since 1886. Attacus cecropia has been remarkably abundant in the tree planted regions of the west and north-western States. The Cotton Worm and Boll Worm have been very abundant and injurious in the cotton fields of the south. Trees and shrubs of all kinds, both in the United States and Canada, have suffered much by the attacks of various leaf-hoppers. These attacks will doubtless all be dealt with by the United States Entomologist or the State Entomologists in their reports, so I shall not now speak of them at greater length than I have done, but will beg you to give me your special attention while I speak to you upon a subject which appears to me to be, at the present time, one of very great importance. It has lately been brought prominently before the entomological world in the pages of Insect Life. This is no less than the organization of the active, working, economic entomologists of North America into a permanent association or union, so that an opportunity may be afforded to those students who are specially engaged in the practical application of the science, of meeting periodically to discuss new discoveries and to 23 exchange experiences as to the best methods of work. The value of such an association cannot, I believe, be over-estimated. The recognition which, during the past decade, has been accorded to entomology asa branch of practical agriculture, makes it important that as little time as possible should be wasted upon unnecessary reduplication of experi- ments, and also, on the other hand, that successful methods of combating injurious insects should be made known as widely and as quickly as possible. A small number of the States of the Union had employed their State Entomologists for some years past and Canada hers since 1884; all of these officers had striven hard to do good and useful work in the vast field which lay before them. Recently, however, a great impulse has been given to practical science in all lines by the very important “ Hatch Experiment Station Act,” which was passed by Congress in 1888. This act provided that a sum of $15,000 should be annually set aside for the purpose of carrying on scien- tific agricultural experiments in every State of the Union. In consequence of this act there have already been organized over 60 experimental stations, twenty-seven of which have entomologists on their staffs, and these officers have already issued much valuable practical information in the shape of bulletins to the farmers of their respective States. The operations of injurious insects are such an important factor in the success or failure of all crops grown, and the recognition of that fact is now becoming so wide-spread amongst the educated agricultural classes, that, before long, it is beyond question that the directors of the other stations will see the advisability of adding an entomologist to their staff. The result of this will be that we shall have in North America a large number of men specially trained for the work they have undertaken, with sufficient time and means at their disposal for carrying out any experiments which may be necessary. Surely under such circumstances important results must follow. They all have the same object in view : the discovery, as soon as possible, of practical—that is efficient, simple and cheap —remedies for the various injurious insects which destroy produce. The work of all these students will of course have to be carried on independently, in widely separated localities, and a fact which will give special value to their labours will be that similar experiments will be carried out carefully and scientifically under differing circumstances and with varying climatic conditions. Such an opportunity for showing the value of science has never before occurred, and it is incumbent on the men who accept these positions to recognise also the responsibility of their offices. I would suggest that not only is extreme care necessary in the carrying out of our experiments as official entomologists, but also great thought must be given to the best means of publishing and making known results. Above all things it is necessary to gain the confidence of those for whom we write. The editors of agricultural papers are frequently inquiring for articles upon economic entomology, but they always say they must be simply expressed or they are useless to them, because their readers will not read them. Even amongst highly educated and even cultivated people you find many to whom the very word ‘‘ science” is a bug-bear, and much more is this the case with a large class of agriculturists ; a class which, although it does contain many men of education and culture, of course consists mainly of men who have not had the time nor opportunity to avail themselves of educational advantages. They are, however, as a class, men who spend their lives away from the distractions, largely frivolous and useless, of city life, and as a consequence develop a faculty for observation, thought and practical application which would indeed be a boon to many an aspirant to scientific fame. Writings upon agricultural entomology should be, I think, couched in the simplest language possible; the articles should be short and concise, without too much detail of the life history of the insects discussed. Prominence should be given to the nature of the attack, so that it may be recognised ; the essential points of the life history of the insect, so that its habits may be understood and missing links filled in; and, above all, the best remedy under existing local circumstances ; and, lastly, a statement of such information with regard to the pest as may be lacking. During a somewhat extensive intercourse with farmers, I have always found them anxious to learn anything about injurious insects and the means of combating them. As a general thing they are willing to ‘devote both time and labour to any 24 experiments suggested, if there is only a chance of success; but they complain that. frequently writings, which are professedly written expressly for them, are unintelligible, that there is too much detail concerning the life history, or that even under remedies there is frequently a long string given without comments, some of which are good and some useless. Now this is to a certain extent true, and is due I think to two causes, either, as stated in Insect Life, that ‘‘ Economic entomology has heretofore greatly suffered by the writings and pretensions of those who have no sort of appreciation of its real value and importance, but who, writing at second hand upon subjects of which they have no personal knowledge whatever, are just as apt to disseminate error as truth,” or perhaps to the fact that some entomologists have tried to cover too much ground, and, while professedly writing articles for the good of a class which it is assumed has no knowledge of scientific terms, at the same time endeavour to maintain their scientific status and secure the credit of priority in description or discovery. I would venture the opinion that it is impos- sible to combine these two causes advantageously, and that the scientific details and neces- sary descriptions and discussion of theories would find a more appropriate place in the scientific periodicals, and transactions of societies devoted to the subject; whilst the results—the practical application of our work for the good of the country—should be published where, and in the manner, they can do the most good. It will be seen in this way that I give the highest place of honour to economic entomology, and this I really believe to be a proper arrangement. The systematic classification of orders and genera and the arrangement of large collections so as to understand the proper relationships which exist are matters of engrossing interest, but the intelligent application of this knowledge for the benefit of mankind at large draws such vast consequences in its wake that it demands the attention of entomologists. So great, however, is the field of entomology that it cannot possibly be covered by any one individual, and the work of specialists in every department is necessary. Owing to the institution of the various experiment stations in the United States with their several entomologists, doubtless the attention of many will now be turned to entomology who otherwise would not have thought of it ; and also so many men entering enthusiastically upon the field at the same time to do original work will certainly have the effect before long of producing eminent and useful public officers. I therefore make a special appeal to you to consider now whether a union which would be the means of bringing together, at least once a year, all those working specially in economic entomology, would not be a useful institution. Some of the official entomologists have been well trained in economic entomology, whilst others are young men fresh from college and with only a general knowledge of the subject. To these latter, of course, by far the greatest advantage would accrue; there is such an infinity of small things and so many doubts which a word from one of greater experience: can settle, that the meeting, if only once a year, where questions of economic interest. alone would be discussed, would be, I believe, an inestimable boon to all of us. And, from the favour with which this suggestion has been received by many of the fathers of economic entomology, I believe that even they would reap sufficient benefit from the experience of others to well repay them for any time they might devote to these meetings for the encouragement of others or for the good of the cause. Without going into too great detail, I shall mention one or two of the advantages which it has occurred to me will be secured in connection with such an organization. First of all, it will give opportunities for a large body of earnest workers, in the same field and with the same interests, to become acquainted with each other, and this I consider a point of great importance. I regret to say that it cannot be denied that there is sometimes evidence of unkind feeling towards fellow students in scientific writings. The social intercourse which would be engendered by the union would do much to put an end to this. Many small matters which might offend or hurt can be overlooked, or, as we say, ‘‘ understood,” when we know the man from whom they emanate, and I presume my experience of life cannot have been very widely different from that of other people when I have found far more to like than to dislike in everyone when you come to know them. Well, this union will allow us to know each other. It will give us an opportunity for systematic work. Problems frequently arise of paramount importance to the whole country ; by this means 25 it will be possible to delegate certain parts of any special investigation to such students as may have special opportunity therefor. Above all the union will be an advisory board, either for discussing matters of great interest to ourselves, or for the advice of the Legislature upon occasion of any serious visitation or threatened visitation by insect enemies ; and thus while we are united we shall do far better scientific work, we shall uphold better the dignity of our offices, we . shall gain the confidence of the public and of the government, and we shall be bound together in a solid union for our own good and that of the country at large. Although I have taken the liberty of bringing this matter before you now, and ask you to express an opinion on it at once, as you are well aware it is no new idea sprung upon the meeting unawares. As I have mentioned, notices have appeared in Insect Life suggesting the matter, and I have myself distributed, to every one who I thought would be interested, a circular notifying them that I proposed bringing the matter up for discussion to-day. The movement seems to have originated with the very eminent United States Entomologist, Prof. C. V. Riley, who has done so much by his writings and successful experiments to raise economic entomology to the honourable position it now enjoys in the appreciation of intelligent people of all classes. And now, gentlemen, allow me thank you for the great honour you conferred upon me when you elected me to preside over you during the past year and at this meeting. I hope sincerely that, the Entomological Club of the American Association may continue to prosper and be the means of bringing us all together at least once a year, like the members of a large and attached but widely scattered family, who rejoice when, on such festivals as Christmas, New Year’s or Thanksgiving Day, an excuse or opportunity is given for a social reunion, where we may discuss with each other, in a friendly manner, matters of general interest. I trust that during the present meeting the deliberations may be carried on in the same spirit of kindness and forbearance which has always characterized previous meetings, and in conclusion I hope that we all may be long spared to meet annually and derive from each other the benefits of scientific discussion and enjoy the social pleasures of mutual intercourse. I am, gentlemen, Your obedient servant, JAMES FLETCHER. At the elose of the address attention was called to the absence of the Secretary, and on motion Clarence M. Weed was elected Secretary pro tem. A long discussion followed concerning the advisability of organising such an association as was suggested in the President’s address, Letters were read by the President from F. M. Webster, Herbert Osborn, A. H. Mackay, F. B. Caulfield, T. E. Bean, M. H. Beckwith, W. B. Alwood, W. H. Harrington, C. J. 8S. Bethune, J. B. Smith and C. M. Weed. Mr. Howard also reported letters from L. F. Harvey, Lawrence Bruner, J. P. Campbell, C. W. Wood- ’ worth, C. P. Gillette, S. A. Forbes, E. J. Wickson, J. H. Comstock, all of whom heartily favored such an organisation. Those present also expressed themselves in favor of it, On motion the Club then adjourned to 9 a.m. en Thursday. The, Club met on Thursday morning pursuant to adjournment, Mr. Fleteher in the chair, and proceeded to discuss the entomological matters touched upon in the Presi- dent’s address. In reply to a query from Mr. Howard, Mr. Fletcher said he never bred any parasites from Vematus erichsonwi, though he had bred thousands of this species. Mr. Howard said he was especially interested to learn, because a few years ago Dr. Packard described a Pteromalus parasitic on this insect which had since proved to be the same as a European parasite. 26 Prof. Cook and Mr. Howard reported the successful use of poisoned baits of ‘ clover and similar substanees in destroying cut-worms. The former had tried it in general field culture in Michigan. Patches of clover were sprayed with Paris green water, then the clover was cut, placed in a waggon and earried to the field where it was distributed in forkfuls before the crop was planted. The cut-worms fed upon it and were killed. Prof. Smith reported that this method had also been successfully used in New Jersey. Mr. Fletcher called attention to the fact that the worms are not killed immediately but go beneath the soil surface about an inch where they die in the course of a day or two. Prof. Cook had also tried planting susculent plants in fields of grape vines and apple trees to prevent the climbing ¢utworms from injuring the buds, with considerable success. He had bred Meromyza Americana from oats very frequently. Prof. Smith had often taken adult Meromyza in a sweep-net in New Jersey, but had not known it to do - any serious damage. He said that the Wheat Midge did some injury in New Jersey. Mr. Fletcher thought no remedy for the Wheat Midge had been suggested but that of destroying refuse. Prof. Cook advocated pushing the crop to rapid maturity. Prof. Saunders reported this pest very destructive in many parts of Canada. At Prince Edward’s Island farmers piant either very early or very late toavoidit. Had lately seen many flies about infested heads which he supposed to be parasites. Prof. Cook said that one of the most serious pests in Michigan was the wire- worm for which no successful remedy was known. One year’s cultivation of buckwheat would not destroy them. He also asked how Chrysopa larve feed, repor ting observations indicating that the juice of the victim was sucked in through the long jaws. Similar observations upon the mode of feeding of Syrphus larve showed that they partially roll themselves inside out, making a sort of funnel of themselves in sucking their victims. In speaking of injury to Larches by Nematus erichsonit, Mr. Howard reported that Dr. Packard had figured in the forthcoming report of the U. 8S. Entomological Com- mission, Larches killed by repeated attacks of this insect, and added that there were Elms on the Department grounds at Washington that had been defoliated year after year by another insect but yet were still vigorous. Mr. Saunders reported that the bean crop had been badly injured by cut-worms this year. Mr. Howard called attention to the ease with which parasites of scale insects can be carried from place to place. Prof. Smith made some remarks on the structural peculiarities of the genus Agrotis tending to show that a loosely assembled mass of species is classed under this generic name. He described the variations in the palpi, the frons, the thoracic tuftings, the antenne, the legs, the wing form and the genera] habitus, and showed that any definition of the genus based upon the existing assemblage would take in every Noctuid, with naked eyes and spinose tibize, hind wings not red or banded. He gave some of the characters upon which he had divided the genus and stated that a monographic revision of the species was completed in MSS. and about ready for the printer. Mr. Weed then read a paper on “Experiments with Remedies for the Striped Cucumber Beetle.” In the discussion which followed Mr. Howard reported that “X. O. Dust ”—a patent combination of ground tobacco and some other substances—had been found a specific for the flea-beetle. gaaxxsMr. Smith reported that he had found the same substance an excellent remedy for the Horn Fly, Asparagus beetle larvee, and many other pests. Prof. Cook reported better success with tobacco decoction than dust. Found the decoction the best remedy for,use on domestic animals. Prof. Cook read a paper giving an account of injury to furniture by a small beetle, Lasioderma serricorne not hitherto reported to have such habits. The Olub then adjourned to meet at 1.30 p.m. 27 At the appointed time the Club was called to order by the President. A paper on ‘“‘ Experiments with Remedies for the Plum Curculio” was read by Mr. Clarence M. Weed. Mr. Smith called attention to the fact that in New Jersey there was no second brood of the Elm Leaf Beetle this season. Prof. Hargitt reported that peaches were seriously injured by the curculio in south-western Ohio this season. Prof. Cook then read an extract from a bulletin of the Michigan Agricultural College concerning spraying with the arsenites, showing that London purple in his experiments had injured foliage more than Paris green. A long discussion followed concerning the injury of foliage by the application of the arsenites, in which various opinions were expressed, the most important point brought out being the necessity of an exhaustive investigation of the whole subject. Prof. W. O. Atwater, of the Office of Experiment Stations of the Department of Agriculture, was then introduced to the Club, and gave a pleasant talk, especially with reference to the co-operation of his office with the recently organised Association of Official Economic Entomologists. The election of officers then took place with the following result :—President, A. J. Cook ; Vice-President, CO. J. 8S. Bethune ; Secretary, F. M. Webster, On motion of Mr. Smith the secretary pro tem was authorised to publish the pro- ceedings of the Club in Entomologica Americana. The Olub then adjourned to meet after the adjournment of the Biological Section, rs A.” A. 8. On re-assembling, Mr. L. O. Howard read a paper entitled “ On the Parasites and Predaceous Enemies of the Grain Plant-louse,” in which he reviewed the previous litera- ture and discussed at some length the rearing by the Division of Entomology, U. S&S. Department of Agriculture, of nine true parasites of Siphonophora avene. Lllustrations of all of the species were exhibited, together with a full series of speeimens. The paper was discussed by Mr. Saunders and Prof. Cook. Mr. H. H. Lyman read a paper on “ Variation in the genus Callimorpha,” in connection with which he exhibited a large series of specimens and discussed at length the question of specific limitations. The paper was discussed at length by Prof. J. B. Smith. A letter from Mr. Wm. H. Edwards was then read by the Secretary, giving the results of breeding experiments for the season. The Club then adjourned sine die. CLARENCE M. WEED, Secretary pro tem. ASSOCIATION OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGISTS. In pursuance of the call published in the Canadian Entomologist, in Entomologica Americana, and distributed by James Fletcher, President of the Entomological Club of the A. A. A.S., the following persons met in Toronto on August 28th, at 4 p. m.:—James Fletcher, Clarence M. Weed, A. J. Cook, L. O. Howard, John B. Smith, 0. J. S. Bethune, H. Garman, W. Saunders, C. W. Hargitt, and others. Organization was effected by the election, upon motion of Prof. J. B. Smith, of Mr. James Fletcher as chairman, and Clarence M. Weed as secretary. Mr. Fletcher, in taking the chair, set out the advan- tages of organization, and urged the formation at the present time of an association that might be specially devoted to entomology in its economic aspect. Remarks to the’same purpose were made by Prof. Cook, Prof. Smith, Mr. Weed, Mr. Howard, Dr. Bethune 28 and Mr. Garman. After full discussion, Prof. Cook moved, seconded by Prof. Smith, that we do now decide to organize an “ Association of Official Economic Entomologists.”’ Oarried unanimously. Mr. Fletcher submitted a draft of a constitution drawn by Mr. Howard and himself, after consultation with others. The proposed constitution was discussed clause by clause, amended and corrected, and finally adopted as a whole in the following shape :— CONSTITUTION. 1. This Association shall be known as the Association of Official Economic Entomologists. 2. Its objects shall be: (1) To discuss new discoveries, to exchange experiences, and to carefully consider the best methods of work ; also (2) to give opportunity to individual workers of announcing proposed investigations, so as to bring out suggestions and prevent unnecessary duplication of work ; (3) to assign, when possible, certain lines of investiga- tion upon subjects of general interest ; (4) to promote the study and advance the science of entomology. 3. The membership shall be confined to workers in economic entomology. All economic entomologists employed by the general or State Governments, or by the State Experimental Stations, or by any agricultural or horticultural association, and all teachers . of economie entomology in educational institutions, may become members of the Associa- tion by transmitting proper credentials to the secretary, and by authorising him to sign their names to this constitution. Other persons engaged in practical work in economic entomology may be elected by a two-thirds vote of the members present at a regular meeting of the Association, and shall be termed associate members. Members residing outside of the United States or Canada shall be designated foreign members. Associate or foreign members shall not be entitled to hold office or to vote. 4. The officers shall consist of a President, two Vice-Presidents and a Secretary, to be elected annually, who shall perform the duties customarily incumbent upon their respective offices. The President shall not hold office for two consecutive terms. 5. The annual meeting shall be held at such place and time as may be decided upon by the Association. Special meetings may be called by a majority of the officers, and shall be called on the written request of not less than five members. Eight members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. 6. The mode of publication of the proceedings of the Association shall be decided upon by open vote at each annual meeting. All-proposed alterations or amendments to this constitution shall be referred to a select committee of three at any regular meeting, and, after a report from such committee, may be adopted by a two-thirds vote of the members present, provided that a written notice of the proposed amendment has been sent to every voting member of the Associa- tion at least one month prior to date of action, (Signed) JAMES FLETCHER, CLARENCE M. Wexsp, A. J. Coox, E. Baynes Resp, Joun Bb. Smita, H. GarMAn, CHARLES J. S. BETHUNE, C. W. Hareirt. L. O. Howarp. The hour being late, Mr. Howard moved an adjournment to the 29th, after the meeting of the Biological Section of the A. A. A. 8.—Carried. The Association met, pursuant to the adjournment, at the call of the Chairman pro tem, at Scarborough Heights, near Toronto, at 4 p.m., Aug. 29th; the Chairman, Mr. Fletcher taking the chair. On motion of Prof. J. B. Smith, seconded by Mr. L. O. 29 Howard, the reading of the minutes of the meeting of the Committee organizing the Association was dispensed with, and resolved that the members present do sign the con- stitution as read and approved.at the last meeting, and that by their action the Associa- tion of Official Economic Entomologists be, and is hereby duly organized. The following members then signed the Oonstitution in the order named :—James Fletcher, Chairman ; A. J. Cook ; John B, Smith ; Chas. J. S. Bethune ; L. O. Howard ; Olarence M. Weed ; E. Baynes Reed ; H. Garman; C. W. Hargitt. The Secretary was authorized to transfer the signatures to the minute book of the Association and to add the signatures of those who had expressed a desire to join in the work of the Association. Letters were then read from Dr. F. Goding, Illinois, and Dr. J. A. Lintner, New York, expressing sympathy with and approval of the objects of the Association, and asking to be enrolled as members. On motion of Prof. Smith, seconded by Mr. Weed, the election of officers was then proceeded with. Prof. Smith nominated Prof. C. V. Riley as first President of the Association, stating that his recognized pre-eminent position as an economic entomologist, and his active interest in the work of establishing this Association, entitled him to the honor and recognition of the Association by election to that office. The nomination was seconded by Dr. Bethune and Mr. Weed each stating the high claims of Dr. Riley to the position. On motion of Prof. Cook, seconded by Prof. Smith, Dr. Riley was elected by acclamation. Prof. Smith nominated Prof. S: A. Forbes as lst Vice-President of the Association. The nomination was seconded by Mr. Howard, and Prof. Forbes was elected by acclama- tion. Mr. Weed nominated Prof. A. J. Cook, as 2nd Vice-President of the Association. The nomination was seconded by Dr. Bethune, and Prof. Cook was elected by acclamation. Prof. Cook then took the chair and the meeting was carried on under his presidency. Mr. Howard nominated Prof. J. B. Smith as Secretary of the Association. The nomination was seconded by Prof. Hargitt, and Prof. Smith was elected by acclamation. On motion of Prof. Smith, the President was authorized to appoint a committee of two to prepare such by-laws as may be deemed expedient, to be submitted for approval by the Association at its next meeting. Prof. Cook appointed the Secretary and Mr. Howard as such committee. On motion of Mr. Howard, it was resolved that the next annual meeting of the Association be held at the time and place where the Association of Agricultural Colleges and Experiment Stations next meets. On motion of Prof. Smith, the Society then adjourned. Joun B. Smiru, Secretary. ASSOCIATION OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGISTS—FIRST ANNUAL MEETING. In pursuance of the resolution adopted at the meeting in Toronto, when this society was organized, the association met at Washington, D. C., on the 12th of November, From the New York Weekly Press we have obtained the following report of its proceedings. A number of well known entomologists were in attendance. In addition to the president, Dr. Riley, entomologist of the United States Department of Agriculture, and curator of insects in the United States National Musuem, and his principal assistant Mr. L. O. Howard, who acted as secretary, we may mention: Dr. J. A. Lintner, Stat, Entomologist of New York; Professor 8. A. Forbes, State Entomologist of Hlinois , 30 Professor A. J. Cook, entomologist of the agricultural experiment station of Michigan and professor of entomology in the Michigan Agricultural College ; Professor William Saunders, director of the experiment stations of Canada .and author of the well-known ‘‘ Saunders’ Insects Injurious to Fruits and Fruit Trees ;” Professor Lawrence Bruner, entomologist of the experiment station of Nebraska ; Professor J. P. Campbell, entomolo- gist of the experiment station of Georgia: Professor C. P. Gillette, entomologist of the experiment station of lowa; Dr. R. Thaxter, entomologist and botanist of the experiment station of Connecticut ; Professor H. Garman, entomologist of the experiment station of Kentucky ; Professor W. B. Alwood, entomologist of the experiment station of Virginia ; Professor O. Lugger, entomologist of the experiment station of Minnesota ; Professor M. H. Beckwith, entomologist of the experiment station of Delaware; Messrs. W. H. Ashmead, E. A. Schwarz, M. L. Linell, C. L. Marlatt, Tyler Townsend and T. Pergande, assistants in the Entomologist Bureau at Washington; C. R. Dodge, the Agricultural Editor of the Weekly Press, who was formerly connected with the entomological work at- Washington, and several entomologists who do not occupy official positions. The main objects of the gathering were to discuss plans for co-operation, to exchange ideas as to methods of work, to discuss the desirability of uniformity of methods in certain kinds of experimentation so as to render results more readily comparable, to talk over late discoveries and to compare notes generally. Washington, with its large collections, its libraries and its large number of resident entomologists, including a flourishing entomolo- gical society, was well chosen as a place of meeting, and from every’ point of view the meeting was a success. Its sessions lasted three days, the 12th 13th and 14th, and many important topics were discussed and several valuable papers were read. To some of these we may briefly refer. Professor Garman, of Kentucky, read a paper entitled ‘‘The Bordeaux Mixture as an Insecticide,” in which he detailed recent experiments which had proven that the mixture in question (sulphate of copper and lime) not only acts as a fungicide in remedying grape mildew and black rot as well as potato rot and scab, but that it also both deters and destroys the insects infesting these plants, so that one application of the mixture to potatoes, for instance, will not only prove a remedy for the rot but also for the flea beetle and Colorado beetle. In commenting upon this paper Professor Riley mentioned the facts concerning the discovery of the fungicide properties of this mixture which he had learned the past summer in France, and which are not known in this country. It was accidental. For years the vinegrowers near Bordeaux had been in the habit of poisoning their outer rows. of vines with this mixture to deter thieves. On the appearance of the mildew (peronspora) some years ago, it was noticed that the outer rows did not suffer, and it was not long before it was discovered that the poisoning was the cause of the immunity, and this particular mixture has since remained at the head of the cheap remedies for many fungous diseases. The important topic, “How far shall we recommend Patent Insecticides and Machinery,” was brought up by Professor Cook, of Michigan, and occasioned an animated discussion. All of the participants had received patent nostrums by the score from the inventors or manufacturers, with request for examination and test and recommendation if the test proved favorable. A very healthy sentiment against fraud and even against unnecessarily high-priced merit was evinced, and it was finally unanimously agreed that the proper policy among official entomologists is not to recommend, even by mention, any patent insecticide until by chemical analysis and careful field test it is found to be: either superior to or cheaper than and, at least, as good as the well-known and generally recommended non-patented mixtures used for the same purpose. Professor Gillette, of Iowa, brought out some interesting points in a paper entitled - ‘Spraying Points,” which summarized careful experiments with the different watery arsenical mixtures upon the foliage of fruit trees, and which was very timely, in view of the recent general adoption of these solutions against the codling moth and plum cureulio. He concluded that white arsenic freshly mixed in cold water does less damage to foliage 31 than any other arsenical mixture, but when boiled in water before dilution it is the most injurious to foliage, showing plainly that it is the dissolved arsenic which burns the leaves, since in a cold, fresh mixture less than 1 per cent. of the arsenic is actually dissolved. Paris green, his experiments showed, injured the leaves more than the cold, white arsenic mixture, and London purple more than the Paris green, but both were less harmful than the boiled solution of white arsenic. All mixtures were of uniform strength, and the tests were most carefully made. Professor Cook agreed with Professor Gillette as to the relative merits of Paris green and London purple, but Professor Riley and Dr. Lintner were inclined to stand by London purple on account of color, price and well-proven value. A discussion of great importance to the members of the association was started by Professor Forbes, of Illinois, in a paper on “ Office and Laboratory Organization. Pro- fessor Bruner, of Nebraska, presented a paper on the corn root-worm, which he instanced as a striking example of the ever-recurring change of habit among insects, which is continually making new pests from heretofore unnoticed species. The topic of co-operation was long and thoroughly discussed and many valuable sug- gestions were made, and the outcome was that a committee, consisting of Professors Riley, Forbes and Oook, Dr. Lintner, and Professor J. H. Comstock, of Cornell University, was appointed to consider and report to the next annual meeting upon a method or methods to secufe co-operation among the members of the association. Other papers were read of a more technical character and consequently of a less general interest, and when the hour of adjournment arrived on the evening of the third day it was found that the programme had not been finished, and the members separated with regret to take up once more in their respective States active warfare against the great and ever-increasing armies of insect pests. POPULAR AND ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY. WINTER COLLECTING. In the continuous chain of nature, great interest will be found at every link, and things unexpected, strange and of marvellous beauty will appear at every point. Even in Canada, snow and ice-bound for so many months in the year, there is much collecting which can be done in the winter. A favorite occupation of the writer is to go off collect- ing with a congenial companion upon snow-shoes. The charm of this pleasant exercise, in which, supported by the light snow-shoes, one can visit places inaccessible during the summer, is in no way diminished by being able to take home with you specimens which will afford ample occupation for many evenings. Starting off in a straight line, many objects of interest are met with as we go along across fields and fences, through woods and swamps and over rivers, hills or even mountains, all levelled and smoothed down to an even surface by their thick covering of ice and snow. In passing through the woods and swamps, cocoons are eagerly looked for on the slender boughs of trees and shrubs. - It is seldom that we are not rewarded with cocoons of the large Emperor moths. In crevices of bark and beneath moss, many hibernating insects are discovered of several orders ; larve of moths and chrysalids of butterflies, bettles and hemiptera. One of our annual trips is to a certain tree for the pretty little homopteron, which forms galls on the leaf of the hack-berry, (Psylla celtidis-mamma, Riley) and which passes the winter in a torpid state beneath tho scales of the bark of the hack-berry, the color of which it closely resembles. In passing through the swamps, tufts of moss are pulled from any exposed hummocks, to be picked to pieces at home when they have thawed out. There will be found many treasures which we have not found in any other way. Every cluster of leaves adhering to a deciduous tree, or swelling upon a stem, has to be examined for the cause, and if it prove to be the work of insects, must be put into the bag for exami- nation. The only apparatus necessary for these expeditions is a bag slung over the shoulder and a stick with a hook on one end and a spike on the other. The bag acts as 32 a large pocket, and saves the inconvenience of unbuttoning your coat when perhaps the thermometer is below zero. The hook on the stick is useful for pulling down boughs or pulling yourself out of a hole ; the spike for prying off pieces of bark or digging into old stumps. Objects of great interest, some of which can be better collected, and from which the insects can be more successfully bred when collected in the winter time, are the various kind of plant galls. These require little trouble; all that is necessary is to put them away in glass jars and keep them closed. After a time the oceupants begin to emerge, and to the surprise of the uninitiated, although each kind is made by only one kind of insect, from the galls will be produced perhaps half a dozen distinct species. These are most of them parasites upon the gall-maker, or what are known as the inquilines or guest flies. The gall-maker produces the gall upon the plant. In this gall some of these guest flies deposit their eggs, and the young grubs feed upon the substance of the gall, or others again live as parasites, either upon the grubs of the gall-makers or their guests. Watching these as they emerge, and making notes upon them, will be found most entertaining at a time of the year when there is little active life out of doors. A further zest is added to this department of study from the fact that so little has been done in this line that many of the flies so bred will be new to science. Other places which may be visited in the winter are groves of evergreens, where much will be found to repay the collector. Amongst the leaves of the pines are cases of larve, andon the leaves themselves are the burrows of the caterpillars of a tiny moth. Beneath the bark are numerous scolytid bark-borers, and from the solid wood beneath may be extracted the large grub of the timber-borers. To obtain these last, however, an axe will be found necessary. In the garden the horticulturist will find plenty of work with which to occupy himself profitably. The egg mosses of the tent caterpillar should now be collected and destroyed, as well as those of the tussock moths. Clusters of dead leaves should be removed trom apple trees, and thin stems cleared of the scales of the oystershell bark-louse and other small insects which winter in rough places on the bark or amongst the buds. In addition to the above work out of doors, much is to be done during the winter to prepare for the work of the coming season. Apparatus and storing boxes for specimens should be prepared well beforehand, or perhaps when the time comes to use them oppor- tunities will be lost. Some simple elementary book should be procured and read at leisure. In our library at London we have for the use of our members, many books of this nature, which can be borrowed by applying to the librarian. We should recommend to beginners, Kirby & Spence’s Entomology, Packard’s Entomology for Beginners, and Comstock’s Introduction to Entomology. THE APPLE TREE TENT CATERPILLAR. THE AMERICAN LACKEY MOTH. (Clisioeampa Americana, Har.) There are two kinds of caterpillars which every year commit serious depredations in our Canadian apple orchards, although they by no means confine their attentions to that tree. These are the larvee of the American and Forest Lackey moths, two species of brown moths which frequently fly into houses at night during July, and draw atten- tion by their headlong, reckless flight, dashing themselves against the ceiling and the walls and very often finishing up by getting into the lamp chimney. Speaking generally, there is a great resemblance between these two insects in appearance and habits, and the same remedies are applicable for both. When examined carefully, however, they differ considerably in all their stages, and may be easily recognised. They belong to the Bombycide or Spinners, a family which contains the silk worm moths and several other thick-bodied hairy moths, with large wings but small heads, bearing pectinated antennz, and having the mouth parts imperfect, or as in those now under consideration not developed at all. The caterpillars of the Bombycide are usually hairy or tufted, and when full grown spin a coeoon for the protection of the short thick chrysalids, 33 At fig. 3 the different stages of the American Lackey moth are given. This species appears in the perfect state in the beginning of July, about a week earlier than the other species referred to above, which is known by the name of the Forest Tent Caterpillar. (C, disstria, Hub. C. sylvatica, Har.) ; Fic. 2.—Male. Fig. L—Female. The American Lackey moth (fig. 1 female, fig. 2 male) is a pretty species of a dull but rich reddish-brown color, having the upper wings crossed obliquely by two clear whitish parallel lines. In rare instances these show faintly on the lower wings also. The fringes of the wings are of the same color as the oblique lines. The space enclosed between the light lines is paler than the rest of the wings in the males, but of the same color or rather darker in the females. On the under side all four wings are crossed by a well defined irregular whitish bar. The perfect insects, having their mouth parts undeveloped, partake of no food, but devote the whole period of their short lives to the perpetuation of their kind. As soon as they have paired and the females have laid their eggs, they die. The eggs (fig. c) are deposited in rings upon the smaller twigs of various trees, usually Kies s within a short distance of the tips. Each egg-cluster contains from 200 to 300 eggs, which when laid are covered with a liquid glutinous substance, which soon dries and cements . them firmly together, and protects them from rain and the weather. A surprising point in the life-history of these insects, is that about a month after the eggs are laid the young caterpillar is fully formed inside the egg, and it remains in this condition all through the winter, only eating its way out of the egg in the following 3 (EN.) 34 spring, when the leaves expand. Immediately upon hatching, the young caterpillars consume the glutinous covering of the eggs, and then lose no time in attacking the foliage. They at once begin the construction of their tent, which is a web of fine silk, spun in the nearest fork of the twig upon which they were hatched, This tent is increased in size as the caterpillars grow, and if left undisturbed is sometimes nearly a foot in diameter. The caterpillars are very regular in their habits, marching out in regular processions, each following close behind the one in front of it. From the habit of the larve of this genus of marching out in bodies to feed, they are known in Europe as “ processionary cater- pillars.” When their appetites are satisfied, they return again to their tents to rest. They do not feed at night nor in stormy weather. They usually do not leave their tent until after nine in the morning, and have all returned before sundown. They are generally inactive in the middle of the day. When full grown the caterpillars are two inches in length, and beautifully marked with black, white, blue, yellow and brown, in the pattern shown in fig. 3, 6. The continuous stripe down the back is white, and serves as a distinctive mark by which this species can be at once known from the Forest Tent caterpillar, (fig. 4) which has this dorsal stripe broken up into spots. This Fie. 5. latter also differs in not constructing a tent, but merely spins a mat of silk on the side of the tree or upon one of the large branches, on or near which it lives more or less in community ; but it has not the same social habits as its relatives. Just before they spin their cocoons the caterpillars wander very much, seeking a suitable place. The cocoon (fig. 3, d@) is greenish yellow, and contains a powdery material like powdered sulphur. The moths emerge in about eighteen or twenty days after the cocoon is made. Remedies.—The most successful remedies with these insects are undoubtedly hand- picking. During the winter the egg-clusters (fig. 3 c, and fig 5) can be easily collected and destroyed. They are always laid upon the small twigs and near the tips, so that if a dull day be chosen they can be easily detected against the sky, and can then be cut off and burnt, when of course that tree is exempt from attack until eggs are laid again the next year. If this precaution is neglected, the nests which are conspicuous objects, before the foliage is fully expanded in spring, must be cut off and destroyed. An invasion from neighboring trees can be prevented by tying a strip of cotton batting around the trunk, which the caterpillars have difficulty in climbing over. CUT-WORMS. Of all the injuries committed year after year upon field and garden crops, none are more annoying than those due to the ravages of the various caterpillars known as Cut- worms. These are the larve of dull-colored, active moths, belonging for the most part to the three genera, Agrotis, Hadena, and Mamestra, and in North America alone consti- 35 tute an army of no less than 340 different described species, many of which are, at times, very abundant. They may be described, in a general way, as smooth, almost naked, greasy-looking caterpillars, of some dull shade of color similar to the ground in which they hide during the day. The head is smooth and shining, and sometimes of a different color from the rest of the body. On the segment next to the head is a smooth plate, known as the thoracic shield, and there are three or four series of bristle-bearing tubercles along the sides. Their habits are nocturnal, that is, they feed at night and lie hid during the day-time. The habits of most cut-worms are as follows :—The eggs are laid in spring, summer or autumn, and the insects pass the winter either in the perfect moth state, as a half-grown caterpillar, or as a chrysalis. Those which hibernate as moths, lay eggs in the spring and moths are produced in the autumn. The eggs which are laid in summer and autumn hatch soon after, and the caterpillars either become full fed the same season and pass the winter underground in the chrysalis state, or, after feed- ing for a short time, become torpid, and so pass the winter beneath stones, heaps of dead vegetation, or in cells beneath the surface of the ground. The injury done by the young caterpillars in the summer and autumn is seldom noticed at those seasons, on account of the abundant vegetation ; but, in the spring, not only are the caterpillars larger and -capable of more mischief, but the land is cleared of all vegetation other than the crop which is to be grown. They are then particularly troublesome in gardens, cutting off young cabbages, tomatoes, and other plants as soon as they are pricked out. When full fed, these caterpillars burrow into the ground to a depth of some inches and turn to brown chrysalids inside a smooth cell or a light cocoon, Fig. 6. From these, after a few weeks, the perfect moths emerge. They are very active at night, and, when disturbed, —_——- have a habit of dropping to the ground and remaining per- ==>. fectly still as if dead, where, from their dull colors, they are difficuit to detect. When at rest, their wings lie horizontally over their backs, and the upper ones entirely cover the lower pair. The upper wings are generally crossed with one or more waved lines, and always bear two characteristic marks—one about ‘half way down the wing, orbicular in shape ; the other nearer the tip, reniform or kidney shaped. Fig. 7 shows ‘The Gothic Dart Moth” (Agrotis subgothica, Haw.,) with wings closed and expanded ; this is a very com- mon and injurious species, the caterpillar of which is too well known as the “ Dingy Cut- worm.” Cut-worms may be divided imto three classes, according to their habits, and remedies Soe must be applied in a slightly different manner aS for each. These classes are :— Fic. 7—Goruic Dart Morn. 1, Climbing Cut-worms, or those which climb trees and destroy the buds. 2. Surface Cut-worms, or those which live on the surface of the ground and cut off - herbaceous plants just beneath the surface of the soil. 3. Those which combine both of these habits. Of the first class, a good representative is the Climbing Cut-worm (Agrotis scandens, Riley). The Dingy Cut-worm, the caterpillar of the Gothic Dart Moth (Fig. 7) belongs to the second class, and the “ Variegated Cut-worm ” (A grotis saucia, Treit.), and the ‘“* Yellow-headed Cut-worm,” which turns to the ‘‘ Amputating Brocade Moth ” (Hadena arctica, Bois.) (Fig. 8) are good representations of the third class, Fic. 8—Amputative Brocape Mors. Remedies.—There are several remedies which may be used for cut-worms. For the climbing kinds, the best remedy is to place round the stem of the tree or bush to be protected, a strip of tin four inches wide, the lower edge 36 can be pressed into the ground, and the tubular shape is easily preserved by securing it above with a piece of twine. This will effectually keep all cut-worms from the tree, for these heavy-bodied caterpillars are unable to crawl over the smooth surface. A similar expedient is to tie a band of cotton batting around the stem, as the caterpillars cannot crawl over this yielding material. For surface cut-worms the most efficient remedies are the following :— 1. Keeping down all weeds in late summer and autumn, so as to deprive those species which hatch in the autumn of their food supply and winter shelter. 2. Burning off all the stubble and rubbish as late as possible in spring, when many caterpillars and the eggs of some species will be destroyed. 3. Placing some substance with an obnoxious odor around young plants when first set out, as fresh gas-lime, or sand or sawdust saturated with coal oil or carbolic acid. 4. Wrapping. Young plants may be protected in a large measure by simply wrapping a piece of paper around the stems at the time of planting. 5. Tomato cans with the tops and bottoms cut out, placed over the young plants, or strips of tin as suggested for Climbing Out- worms, will be found to well repay the trouble and expense of pro- curing them. 6. Kerosene emulsions. Where these caterpillars occur in very ~ large numbers, spraying infested beds with a kerosene emulsion at 4,.9 wreryGrounp night has been found very beneficial. Bertie. 7. Traps. Placing bundles of leaves or grass, poisoned with Paris green, between the rows of infested beds has been found a useful means of destroying large numbers of these pests. 8. Hand picking. When a plant is seen to have been eaten off, of course the cut- worm should always be looked for and destroyed. They will generally be found close to the root and about an inch beneath the surface. In addition to the above artificial remedies, nature has provided the farmer with many useful and active assistants in the shape of various predaceous insects. Con- spicuous amongst these are the Ground Beetles, which should be known by sight by every one, so that they may be protected, and not, as is often the case, destroyed because they are insects. At Fig. 9 is shewn the “ Fiery Ground Beetle” (Calosoma calidum Fab.), a common and very useful species. Its color is deep black with red (or some- times green) glowing spots. The grub has been styled the ‘“ Cut-worm Lion,” on account of its useful habits of destroying these pests. THE IMPORTED CURRANT SAW-FLY—(NEMATUS RIBESII, SCOP). Amongst insects which every year make their presence noticeably apparent by their injuries, and thus win the distinction of being “ First-class Pests” to the fruit-grower, not one, perhaps, is better known, nor, when not checked in its operations, more annoy- ing, than the currant worm, the larval state of the imported currant saw-fly, Vematus Ribesti, Scop. (=N. ventricosus, Klug). This is a European insect, which, although it has only been noticed in America for thirty years, has already spread over a large proportion of the settled parts. Early in the spring when the buds are bursting upon the currant and gooseberry bushes, active yellowish four-winged flies will be seen flying around the bushes or crawling over the unfolding leaves. These are the parents of the currant worms. The two sexes differ a good deal in appearance. At Fig. 10 they are both represented enlarged. The hair- lines at the sides show their natural sizes. The male is shown at a. It is slightly the smaller, and is much darker in color. The head and thorax are almost black, with some 37 dull yellow spots. Tho abdomen is dark above but yellow beneath and at the tip. The wings are glossy with dark veins. The males are equally abundant with the females, but are not so often observed, from the fact that they are seldom found on the bushes, but fly near the ground and beneath the bushes as if to welcome the females when they emerge from the soil, beneath which they have passed the winter in their snug cocoons. The females are larger than the males, and of a bright honey-yellow color. Fic. 10. The greenish-white glossy eggs which are about one-twentieth of an inch in length are laid along the main ribs, beneath the leaves of gooseberries and currants, as shown at Fig. 11 (1). As soon as the young larve hatch, they at once attack the leaves upon which the eggs are laid, and eat small holes, as shown in Fig. 11 (2 and 3). They are very voracious, and their growth is very rapid indeed, little more than a week suffic- ing for them to pass through all their stages. These characteristics added to the large number of eggs laid by each female, make constant vigilance on the part of the fruit-grower a necessity, or he will find his goose-berry and currant bushes stripped of every leaf in a few days. When the young larvz come out of the eggs, they are about one-twelfth of an inch in length, with large heads and a semi-translucent body. At first they all remain on the same leaf, but as they grow large they separate and spread in all directions over the bush. They are green at first, then dark bluish green, covered with small black dots, each one of which bears a bristle, and lastly, after the last moult, pale green with vellow extremities. When full grown they spin smooth oval brown cocoons, which, however, are some- ‘times of a greenish white colour. Those of the summer brood are generally on or near the surface of the ground, but at a considerable depth beneath it in the brood which passes the winter inside cocoons. ‘The chrysalis state is assumed at once in the summer brood, and the perfect flies appear in about a fortnight. The autumn brood, however, passes the winter in the larval state inside the cocoons, and the larve only change to chrysalids a short time before the flies appear in the spring. Notwithstanding that this insect is attacked by a host of parasitic enemies, it is gener ally necessary for the fruit-grower to apply active remedies. Of these, “ white helle- bore ” isthe best. One or two ounces of this powder mixed in a little hot water at the bottom of a pail, and then filled up with cold water, will give a sufficient quantity of the mixture to sprinkle a large number of bushes. This is most conveniently done with an ordinary clothes whisk. The powder may also be used dry ; when mixed with four times its bulk of common flour, it should be puffed over the bushes after rain, when the dew is on them, or after they have been sprinkled with water. This is most conveniently done 38 by means of the small hand-bellows, now obtainable at all chemists. With regard to the danger of using this material, I will quote from an excellent and very complete article upon this subject by Prof: W. Saunders, which appeared in our Ent. Soc’y, of Ont. Rep . for 1871-2, p. 32. “ Tt has been urged against hellebore that it is poisonous, and great outcries have been raised against it on this account. It is quite true that hellebore is poisonous when taken internally in quantities, but if used-in the manner we have indicated, no fear need be entertained of the slightest injury resulting from it. Examined immediately after a thorough sprinkling with the hellebore mixture, the quantity on any bunch of fruit will be found to be infinitesimal, and the first shower of rain would removeit all. Ifit be found necessary at any time to apply the mixture to bushes where the fruit is ripe and just ready to be picked, it might then be washed in water before using, which would readily remove every trace of the powder. During the past ten years many thousands of pounds of hellebore have been used in Europe and America for the purpose of destroying this worm, — and we know of no case on record where injury has resulted from its use.” Another insect of the same family, and with very similar habits to the above, is the Larch Saw-fly, Vematus Hrichsonit, the larve of which are now spreading rapidly over the Eastern United States and Canada. I have received inquiries concerning it from several of our members in different provinces of the Dominion, particularly from Nova Scotia and Quebec. The eggs of this species are imbedded in the soft wood of the young shoots of the tamarac when growth first begins in June. The growth is stopped on the side where the eggs are deposited, and the twig becomes distorted and is eventually destroyed. This injury, however, is slight compared with the destruction of the foliage. There are at the present moment in Canada, from the Atlantic coast as far west as Ottawa, thousands of acres of tamarac entirely stripped of their leaves. On another occasion a fuller account of this injurious insect will be given. THE TIGER SWALLOW-TAIL BUTTERFLY. (Papilio Turnus, L.) Just about the time the lilac bushes open their fragrant blossoms the grand insect shown at figure 12 may be seen either hovering over gardens and sipping the nectar of flowers, or sailing majestically down some woodland glade. It generally appears at Figure 12. Ottawa about the first of June, and may be seen fora month or more. Farther to the north it comes later, not appearing at Nepigon, north of Lake Superior, until the end of June. »This insect has many characters which make it of interest to the collector. Its 39 size and beauty make it a striking object in the spring landscape. Although it varies in abundance in different years, it is generally one of the first treasures of the young col- lector, and is prized accordingly. The variations it presents in different latitudes and the habits of its remarkable caterpillar are of great interest to the student. In thenorth, including the whole of Canada, the males and females are like our figure, having the ground colour of a pale lemon-yellow, with rich black markings. The broad margin is more or less powdered with blue scales, particularly on the hind wings, which are further ornamented with a conspicuous orange-red spot, bordered with black and blue, near the hind angle, and in the females there is another large spot of the same colour at the upper angle. In the Southern States the specimens of both sexes are larger and more highly coloured, and besides a black dimorphic form of the female also occurs. No specimen of the black male has ever been taken. The only approach to this melanic form is the beautiful suffused variety which is figured below. The range of the Tiger Swallow-tail is very extended. I have some specimens from the arctic circle and others from the tropics, while from east to west it occurs from Newfoundland to Alaska. The eggs are laid by the females singly on the upper side of the leaves of its food plants. They are about one-twentieth of an inch in diameter, sub-globular and smooth, at first of a pale transparent green, much yellower at the base by reason of a more or less abundant waxy substance which fastened them to the leaf ; after a few days they turn reddish, and just before the young larve hatch they are almost black. The time of hatching varies with the weather from ten to twenty days. The caterpillars are very different in appearance during their various stages. In the first stage the general appearance is black, with white spots and tubercles, and a conspicuous white saddle-shaped mark on the back. This mark also appears after the first and second moults, but is then of a pinkish cream colour. After the second moult the ground colour of the body usually changes to greenish brown. After the third moult the green colour is much more decided, and the caterpillar assumes more of the shape and markings of the full-fed larve. The thoracic segments are now enlarged and the saddle-shaped mark is almost obliterated. There isa yellowish band in front of segment 2, and another on the hinder edges of segments 5 and 12 ; that on five is followed closely by a black line on the front edge of segment 6. This black line does not show when the caterpillar is at rest. The head is pink brown. On each side of segment 4 now appears a pear-shaped yellow eye-like spot, the larger end outwards. This spot is edged by a fine black line ; inside there is a heavy black line enclosing a violet spot. Towards the smaller end of this yellow spot is a short black bar. The sides of the body are also ornamented with rows of violet spots, two upon segment 4, and four upon 5, 8, 9, 10 and 11, and two upon 12. On segments 6 to 11 there is one small spot below each spiracle. These spots are more distinct upon some specimens than upon others. After the fourth or last moult the colour is invariably velvety green, paler beneath, the saddle-shaped mark has disappeared and the yellow marks are ali more conspic- uous. The full-grown caterpillar is shown at figure 13, and is a formidable looking creature. For two days before it suspends itself to change to the chrysalis, it gradu- ally assumes a purplish brown tint, and the violet spots become more distinct than they were before. The full-grown larva is about one inch and a-half in length when walk- ing. When at rest it is shorter and thicker, the head is drawn out of sight and the body assumes a wedge shape, large in front, taper- ing rapidly to the last segment. When in this position the yellow spots on segment 4 have the appearance of two large open eyes. This appearance may possibly act as a pro- . tection from some of its enemies. When Figure 13. ready to turn to a chrysalis, it leaves its food-plant and seeks some place to pupate. It suspends itself to a silken mat and supports its body by means of a silken girdle around the middle. It changes to a chrysalis the second day after suspension. The newly formed chrysalis is very beautiful, being mottled with green, dove colour, black, and white, the two eye-like spots on segment 4 being very distinct. After a few hours, how- 40 yk ever, the green nearly all fades out and the chrysalis darkens to the tint of dead wood. In all parts of Canada there is only one brood of this butterfly. The eggs are laid in June and July and the caterpillars pupate late in the summer and go through the win- ter in the chrysalis state. The habits of the caterpillar are sluggish. From the first they spin a mat of silk to rest upon when not eating and sally out to feed. When very young they eat into the edge of the leaf upon which they hatch ; but as they grow. larger they crawl away to other leaves near at hand, and return again to rest upon the same leaf, all the time there is food at a convenient distance ; when this is all consumed they move off to a fresh branch and start another centre of operations. This mat is so spun as to curl the leaf up somewhat and form a platform, so that in case of rain the cater- pillar is raised above the wet leaf. When disturbed they have a special means of defence, in the shape of an orange forked scent-organ, which they can protrude at will from an orifice in the second segment. At the same time a, strong pungent odour is emitted. The caterpillars possess this organ in all their stages, but seldom use it except in the last stage. The food-plant of this insect is very varied. In this district it is most frequently found upon apple, cherry, ash, birch and aspen trees. Figure 14 represents a very beautiful suffused melanic male, which was taken in Figure 14. July, 1888, by Mr. Robt. Mackenzie, at Collins Inlet, upon the Georgian Bay, eighteen miles east of Killarney, Ont. As this is the only approach to the black male which has so far been discovered, it has been thought well to have it photographed and engraved.* The specimen is in very fine condition, the black and yellow clear and unfaded. The red eye-spot at the anal angle is distinct, and there is another between the extremities of the second and third median veinlets of the hind wing. A few scales of blue shadow the spot at anal angle. There is a conspicuous cloud of the same colour between the second and third median veinlets and a smaller one between the first and second. At the apex of hind wing there is a light cloud of red scales, and a slight tinge of red between the extremities of costal and first subcostal veins. *The photograph was taken by Mr. H. N. Topley, of Ottawa, by the new Isochromatic process, and the engraving was made directly from the photograph. 4] A NEW CLOTHES BEETLE. BY PROF. A. J. COOK, AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, MICHIGAN. One of the most interesting studies of the scientific entomologist—more interesting because of its economic importance—relates to variation of habits of insects consequent upon variation in their environment. The Carpet Beetle—Anthrenus scrophularic Linn., feeds on flowers in its native Europe. In the new atmosphere of America it feeds and thrives upon carpets, shawls and other woolen goods. The Apple Maggot, Trypeta pomo- nella , feeds upon our wild haw and other wild fruits. Civilization exterminates its old- time aliment, and it betakes itself to our apples, cherries and plums. ‘The curculio, apple tree borers, bark lice, etc., are other illustrations of the same truth. The past season I have discovered another, illustration in the Lasioderma serricorne, Fab. This insect belongs to the family Ptinide. A small family of very small insects. Very few of the insects of this family are noxious ; the two best known of which are the apple tree twig borer, Amphicerus bicawdatus, Say, which bores in the mature state, in the twigs of the apple; and Linoxylon basilare, Say, which attacks the hickory and grape. The insect in question, Lasioderma serricorne, Fab., has been found to attack plush furniture. The larve in this case do the mischief. They perforate the plush mak- ing it like a sieve. I know of several pieces of upholstered furniture utterly ruined by these minute larve. The beetle is light brown in color. There is little variation in the color except that the eyes and tips of the elytra are black. The wing covers appear a little lighter, because of a covering of light hairs which are more dense on the elytra than on the thorax and head. The thorax bends down, so that as we look from above we cannot see the head. The serrate antennz, which give its name to the beetle, are also close bent under the head, so as to rarely show. The beetle is very small, hardly more than two m.m. long. The elytra are non-striated. The first two joints of the antenne are small. They then increase to the sixth, and then decrease to the end. The tenth or last joint is rounded. The grubs are short, curled and hairy. They are two m.m. long and one thick. The color is white, and the hairs nearly white. These latter have a slightly yellowish tinge. The six thoracic legs are tipped with black. The upper part of the head shows four yellowish- brown lines. The upper ones are narrowest, while the lateral ones are abbreviated behind. The front of the head is brown, while the jaws and other mouth parts are nearly black. Like all insects, these beetles—both as larve and imago—-are very susceptible to - gasoline or bisulphide of carbon. Both of these, used in large quantities, were quickly fatal to the insects. Like the Carpet Beetle, they infest upholstered furniture between the folds, especially where the back joins the seat. It is easy to drench such parts of a sofa or chair with gasoline and destroy the larve of either moth or beetle. : Nearly every year brings examples of such changes of habits as described above. Such incursions, present and prospective, emphasize the importance of thoroughly trained entomologists in every State of our country. INSEOTS INFESTING WILLOWS. BY W. HAGUE HARRINGTON, OTTAWA. The trees and shrubs belonging to the genus Salix of botanists, are not of such economic importance as many other of our native woods, but they are at least of suffi- cient value to receive some consideration from entomologists. About fifty species are recorded from Oanada, many of which are arctic or mountain plants, some being shrubs 42 only a few feet, or even inches, in height. Some of the larger species which grow in less vigorous situations are trees of considerable size. About fifteen species are recorded from Ontario, including those which are planted as ornamental varieties. Although the wood of the willow is soft, it is smooth and light and is adapted for a variety of purposes, such as making toys, handles of tools, cricket bats, etc. It also fur- nishes charcoal which is largely employed in the manufacture of gunpowder. The bark of many species is rich in tannin and also furnishes the crystalline substance called sali- cin, which forms the basis of the salicylic acid so largely employed in the treatment of rheumatism and gout, and as a tonic and febrifuge. Some species, known as osiers, are largely used in basket making, and of late years the manufacture of household furniture—chairs, tables, baby-carriages, etc.—has become very important. Large quantities of osiers for such work are annually imported by America, which might without difficulty be grown at home. In the Western States willows are largely employed for hedges and windbreaks, and they should be similarly used by the settlers in our North-West prairie lands. They are quick growers and can be easily propagated, and would be found of far more value than many of the trees and shrubs which are now being planted. Some of the ornamental varieties, such as the Babylonian, or Weeping Willow, are widely grown, and form a decided addition to our list of trees for lawn planting, etc. HYMENOPTERA. The flowering of the various willows is one of the earliest visible signs that at last the long winter is ended, and that the warmer breath of gentle spring is re-awaking plant and insect life and quickening the pulses of all nature. Now to the opening pendu- lous spikes of bloom swarm various kinds of bees to sip the honey and toroll and revel in the golden pollen so abundantly produced, until they are themselves so bepowdered, and gilded as to be hardly recognizable. How they rejoice in the bountiful supply of this rich food, and how industriously they labor through the shining hours of the long spring days to transport the honied mixture to the holes and crannies where their prospective progeny are to lazily surfeit themselves with the good things so bountifully pro- vided by the mother insects. In the warm days of late April and early May the air in the vicinity of willows is murmurous with the whirr of tiny wings, as the busy hosts come and go in endless and rapid succession. The majority belong to the genera Andrena and Halictus, small dark bees, more or less pubescent, those of the latter genus having sometimes the abdomen belted with bands of silvery white hairs. There are also numerous representatives of the genus Osmia ; small green or bluish bees, having a brush of stiff - hairs beneath the abdomen for the collection of the pollen. We also find abundantly, pretty little red bees more or less marked with yellow, which belong to the genus Vomada and differ from the preceding species in having no provision for the transportation of food, and in being parasitic in their habits. I will not take up space by giving a catalogue of the various species, as this paper is intended chiefly to enumerate the foes, not the friends of the willows, and to the latter class the bees fortunately belong. As we all know, the flowers of these trees are diwcious, that is, the male and female flowers are borne upon separate plants, and fertilization depends upon the agency of the wind or upon that of insects. In this work of fertiliza- tion the bees play an important part, as they fly all pollen-coated from tree to tree. Saw-F.ies. (Z'enthredinide.) Turning from the industrious and useful bees we find another section of Hymen™ optera, the larvee of which feed upon the tissues of plants, and which has consequently ‘been called Phytophaga, from the two Greek words phyton, a plant, and phagi, to eat. The name commonly applied to these forms is ‘ Saw-fly,” from the ovipositor of the female being modified into a saw-like instrument with which to slit the hard tissues of 45 the leaves or stems, preparatory to the insertion of the eggs. Figure 15 represents Harpiphorus maculatus, Nort., the Strawberry Saw-fly, in all its stages. R The species found upon the various willows may be divided into two groups ; those whose larvze feed openly upon the foliage in its natural state, and those of which the larve subsist in concealment upon the substance of galls, produced by themselves, or by other insects, upon the leaves and twigs. Of the former group four species may be mentioned : Cimbex Americana, Leach. This is the largest of all Canadian (or indeed Am- erican) Sawflies, and its larva is corres- pondingly voracious. The range of this insect extends from “ocean to ocean,” : and there are several varieties. In the Fie 15. typical form the male is nearly black ; the head and thorax have a bluish tinge, and the abdomen a purplish one. The female is black with whitish or yellowish spots on the sides of the abdomen. Both sexes have yellow feet. The antennz are also yellow, and consist of seven joints, the last three forming aknob. These saw-fties vary in length from three-fourths of an inch to one inch, and the male especially is a very formidable looking fly, with his long, toothed jaws anc big clumsy legs. The egg is placed in a slit made upon the upper surface of a leaf, pro- ducing a small blister thereon. The larva is of a pale yellowish colour, with a black stripe running down the back, and black dots along the sides. When full grown it mea- sures about an inch and a half in length, and spins a strong brown oval cocoon, which remains during the winter upon the ground under leaves and debris. In the spring the larva transforms to the pupa and the perfect insect appears in May or June. I have found the larve chiefly upon the foliage of elms, but they also infest the lin- den and willow, and have sometimes been found very injurious to the last named. The following paragraph is quoted from the Report of the U. 8, Entomologist for 1888, from a paper by Mr. Lawrence Bruner on Nebraska Insects :— “Unless some disease or insect enemy soon appears in sufficient strength to diminish the large Willow Saw-fly (Cimbex Americana) it will completely destroy our hedges of white willow that grow upon the more elevated prairies. The enemy must necessarily be “natural” for the farmers will not look to the matter themselves, This year again the large slug-like larve of this insect appeared in even greater numbers than on previous occasions, and over much more extended areas. In some instances the wild willows also suffered when growing isolated and upon rather high ground. Several farmers followed my instructions and cleared away the debris along their hedges last fall, and burned it, and in that way destroyed the pupe. Where these were isolated from other infested hedges the remedy was quite apparent, but where other pupz were close at hand the work made no perceptible diminution in the number of larve present. ” It is to be hoped that Canadian farmers in such a case would take vigorous and con- certed action, and by annually raking up and burning the leaves and debris the evil would be largely overcome in two or three seasons, not only for this but for many other insects. Trichiosoma triangulum, Kirby.—This is an insect of somewhat similar appearance, but of less size than the preceding, being about three-fifths of an inch long. The head and thorax are black, and the latter is clothed with long whitish hairs. The thighs are bluish-black, and the rest of the legs yellow. The wings have a yellowish lustre. The larve are similar in shape and habits to those of Cimbex, but somewhat smaller, and of a pale greenish colour, without the black stripe along the back. 44 Priophorus equalis, Nort.—This is quite a small species, the perfect fly being hardly one-quarter of an inchin length. The larve, however, sometimes occur in sufficient abundance to seriously affect the foliage. They are of a pale yellowish colour, with the back greenish. The head and last segment are black and there is on each sidea row of black spots, eleven in number. Upon the back and on each side are two rows of small tubercles, bearing long white hairs. The species is apparently double-brooded as from larve obtained in June the flies appeared a month later, and I have observed similar larve in August and September. LateJast August I saw asmall poplar nearly defoliated by larvee apparently of this species, and two or three weeks later, found similar ones on willows. (Note. In the Fifteenth Annual Report I referred to this species as Cladius isomera, Harris, but further examination seems to refer it to P. equalis. The larve of C. isomera, which also occurs here are, however, of very similar appearance and habits. The European species of this genus are recorded as feeding on willow, poplar, cherry, etc.) Dolerus arvensis, Say.—One-third of an inch long of a shining blue-black colour, ex- cept the partly red thorax ; wings smoky. Larve 22-footed grubs feeding in June. Cephus integer, Nort,, is an insect having the abdomen more compressed, and of a more generally elongated shape, which has been figured and described by Prof. Riley, (Insect Life, vol. i., p. 8) as injuring the young shoots of various species of willows in and near Washington. The female inserts the egg a few inches below the tip of the shoot, and afterwards girdles the twig. The larve bore down through the pith. The ravages are indicated by the wilting of the twigs, and a scorched appearance of the plants. The insect occurs in Canada but I have seen no mention of any attack by it. For much of our knowledge of the species of saw-flies forming galls, or subsisting upon the galls of some other insects, we are indebted to Walsh, who bred many of the species, and described them in a paper published in the Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia, Vol. V, page 284. He enumerates about a dozen species belong- ing to the genera Euura and Nematus. The galis produced by the former genus are upon the twigs, being usually enlargements or deformations of the buds, and may be readily found on examining our native willows Salix cordata and Salix humilis. Upon the leaves of the same willows during the summer may sometimes be found in great numbers small galls varying in shape, but generally spherical or oval, which on being opened are found to contain small green larve, and which are produced by different species of Nematus. These insects, however are so much alike that any satisfactory de- scription of them would be far too leng and technical for the purposes of this paper. They are, however, closely related to the saw-fly so destructive to the currant and gooseberry bushes, and differ chiefly in being smaller and less robust. There are also several species which are known as inquilines, or ‘ guests,” because they do not produce galls themselves, but subsist upon those formed by the species above named, or by certain small flies which will presently be mentioned. There is another gall, not mentioned by Walsh, which is very abundant, not upon our native willows but upon S. alba, the common white or European willow. Sometimes nearly every leaf will be attacked, and perhaps will be almost covered by oval, or oblong sessile galls, which become reddish as they mature. They produce a very small fly, about one-sixth or one-fifth of an inch in Jength, and which is apparently the species called Messa hyalina, Norton. (Probably a European Nematus.) DIPTERA, The insects belonging to this order, which are found injurious to various species of willows, are all minute forms, such as are known as gnat-flies or midges, and the majority of them belong to Cecidomyia, to which extensive genus belong, also, the destructive _ clover-midge, Hessian-fly, etc. There are, however, several species of Dzplosis, another group of midges, among which is found the wheat midge, which are uninvited guests of the Cecidomyiz. a Everybody must have observed the large swellings at the tips of willow twigs, which bear so much resemblance to the cones of pines, or spruces. These are the result of the 45 operations of different midges, each of which makes its own distinctive gall. It is very strange that such abnormal growths should result merely from the deposition, in the terminal bud, of a microscopic egg by a tiny midge, yet it is the case, and on pulling one of the galls to pieces we will find snugly ensconced in a cell at the base a little pink or reddish maggot. The species which are the most abundant in this neighborhood are Cecidomyia strobiloides, O. S. and Cecidomyia quaphaloides, Walsh. As these galls are at the tips of the twigs, the growth of the shoots is stopped, and were the insects to become unduly abundant they might dwarf and deform the trees, as does occasionally happen when trees are growing in localities unsuited to them. Fortunately the larve are not secure even in their woody dwellings, but are preyed upon by many species of minute hymenoptera, known as parasites, and belonging chiefly to the Chalcididze. Several species may be bred from one gall; indeed Walsh enumerates more than twenty species of inquilines and parasites from the galls produced by C. brassicoides, Walsh, a species which is very abundant in some portions of Ontario, pro- ducing the cabbage-gall of the willow. LEPIDOPTERA. This order has always been a favorite one with entomologists, as it contains the most beautiful of all insects ; the butterflies and moths. The former are diurnal insects, that is, they appear during the daytime, rejoicing in the sunlight, and floating to and fro on gaily painted wing from flower to flower, the most brilliant or lovely of which cannot match in richness of colour, and exquisite markings, the painted wings of their nectar- seeking visitors. The moths are much more numerous as regards species, and some of them are so large and magnificent, as to be deemed worthy of such titles as Imperial and Regal, yet as they are chiefly crepuscular or nocturnal in their movements, they are not so well known to those who have not studied insect life. Of about seventy-five species of Lepidoptera, of which I have records, as feeding more or less upon willows, only eight are butterflies. The only one of these which is ever found in much abundance is Vanessa Antiopa, L., the Camberwell Beauty. This butterfly hibernates during the winter, and is one of the first insects to be seen on the return of spring, flitting about in sunny glades or hovering around the tapped sugar maples. The female then lays its eggs in a cluster, around the small stem of a willow, the caterpillars from which feed in company upon the foliage, and from their numbers and voracious appetites they rapidly defoliate the plant. The full-grown larva measures from one and three-quarters to two inches in length, and is black, sprinkled with minute white dots ; with a row of eight dark brick-red spots on the back, and beset with num- erous black branching species. The caterpillar changes to a dark-brown chrysalis, sus- Fic. 16. pended by the tip under some sheltering projection, and the butterfly appears about August. As this species also attacks the elm and other trees, it might be a most injuri- ous insect if it were not subject to the attack of a minute parasite, which sometimes destroys nearly every chrysalis, and which is so prolific that I have counted more than 46 400 from a single chrysalis. The butterfly is a beautiful object, of a rich velvety purplish brown, the wings being broadly margined with yellow, in which is a row of pale blue spots. The various species of Limenitis also include the willows in their food-list. This is especially the case with Limenitis disippus, Godt., which also feeds on poplar, plum, oak and apple. During the summer of 1888 it was sufficiently abundant in © this neighbourhood to be considered injurious. The beautifully reticu- lated eggs (Fig. 18, a) are iaid late in June, or in July, and hatch in a few days. The caterpillar (Fig. 16- a) is of a curiously ornamented form and is variegated with green and whitish colours. The chrysalis is suspended like that of Antiopa, = but is of a very different shape, Fic. 17. (Fig. 16, 5.,) having upon the ventral surface a projection like the centre-board of a yacht. The butterfly issues in ten or twelve days, and the eggs are then laid for a second brood. The larve hatched from these, when about half-grown, construct from the leaves neat little cases (Fig. 16, ¢) in which to spend the long, cold winter, and from which they emerge the following spring to complete their growth and meta- : es morphoses. The butterfly (Fig. 17) hasa ¥ black body, and wings of a warm orange- red colour, with heavy black veins, and a wide, black margin, spotted with white. LTimenitis arthemis, Drury, occasion- ally feeds upon willows, and in the ap- pearance and habits of the caterpillar closely resembles the previous species. The butterfly, however, is a much hand- somer insect, being of a rich velvety Era. 18. purple, with a broad, white band across the wings, the margins of which are ornamented with markings of red and blue. Its graceful flight and rich colouring render it one of the most beautiful of our butterflies. As the other butterflies which have been recorded as feeding upon willow are only occasional depredators, or are not found in Ontario, I will pass on to the divi- sion of the Lepidoptera which contains the moths, the species of which are far more numerous. Of the Sphingide, or hawk-moths, two species of Smerinthus are reported to include the willow in their list of food plants, Smerinthus exce- catus, Abb., feeds upon several species of willows and poplars, as well as on birch, elm, hazel, etc. The larva when full-grown is about two inches in length; of a light green colour, and roughened with numerous white granulations. There are seven oblique yellow lines on each side, and the anal segment bears a nearly straight rose- coloured horn ; a similar horn being a distinctive feature of nearly all the caterpillars of the Sphingide. When mature the larva drops to the ground and pupates therein as a. dark chestnut-brown, tolerably smooth chrysalis. The moth is of a very pretty fawn colour ; the head and thorax with a roseate tinge ; the body with a dark-brown line above ;. the wings scalloped on the hinder margin, clouded with brown, and with black and brownish-red spots and patches. Each hind wing has an ocellus, or eye-spot, of pale blue in a black ring. Smerinthus geminatus, Say, much resembles in its various stages the preceding species, but the eye-spot has two or three blue pupils, whence the specific name, which means twin-spotted. 47 The Bombycide, or silk-spinning moths, furnish us with some very large and beautiful species, the most striking, indeed, of all our insects, whether in the caterpillar or perfect state. Samia cecropia, L., is known by all fruit growers as a depredator upon apple, plum, and other trees. The caterpillar (figure 19) is, when full grown, fully three inches long, and its bright colours and curious spined tubercles render it a very striking and inter- esting object. The moth, like those of the three following species, has been frequently figured in our reports. Teleas polyphemus, L., the larva of which" is shown in Figure 20, is a somewhat smaller and more modestly colored moth, and the caterpillar has not such a formidable appearance. It is, when fully grown, about three inches long, and correspondingly stout, of an apple green color, and ornamented with bright colored tubercles and short lines. It feeds on a great variety of trees. Fic, 20. Hie. 21. 48 Actias Luna, L., is the beautiful large pale green moth with long tails to the hind wings, which always evokes the admiration and wonder of those who see it for the first time, and who can scarcely credit (if they have no knowledge of our many splendid insects) that it is a native of Canada. The cater- ; pillar (Fig. 21) resembles a good deal that of the , aN last species, and like it is quite at home on a variety of trees. Hyperchiria Io., Fab., is a very interesting species, from the fact that its caterpillar (Fig. 22) bears numerous branching spines, which have upon the human skin an effect similar to that of the stinging nettle, and on a sensitive place like the face or back of the hand produce great irritation. The caterpillar is about two inches long, of a pea- green color, and with a lateral white line edged with lilac. It is an almost omnivorous feeder, attacking various fruit and forest trees, as well as the hop, maize, and many other plants. The male moth is of a yellowish colour, varied with black and other markings, and with a large eye-spot on the hind wings; the female is larger, expanding about three inches, and is of a darker colour. Bigs 22. Ecpantheria Scribonia, Stall., is another large and handsome insect, known as the Great Leopard Moth (Figure 23, a female and 6 male), The wings are white, with rings, lines and spots of dark brown ; the thorax has several black spots with a bluish white centre, and the steel blue abdomen is streaked with yellow. The caterpillar (Figure 24) is one of those which are known as “ hedge-hogs” (from their habit of rolling themselves’ up into a bristling ball), and is often called the “ great black bear,” because it is covered with tufts of stiff shining hairs. The spaces between the segments (except thoracic ones) are banded with red. 49 eee Eee _ Three species of Halesidota may be mentioned, viz., H. Maculata, Harr.; H, Tessel- aris, Hb.,and H. Carye, Harr. The caterpillars of these are hairy, and are distinguished by having long pencils of black or white hairs upon certain segments. They pupate in hairy cocoons, under stones, loose bark, or other shelters. \ 7 / \}\ &y Fic. 24. Orgyia leucostigma, Sm. Abb., the white-marked Tussock moth (Figure 25), has a caterpillar somewhat similarly clothed, but with different ornamentation and colouring. See Figure 26. Oedemasia concinna, Sm. Ab., is the moth whose larva is called the Red-humped Apple-tree Caterpillar (Fig. 27). The larve have been found by me to feed also upon the willow. The web-making caterpillars of Clisiocampa and of Hyphantria textor, Harr., which by their unsightly webs and omnivorous habits make themselves most unwelcome intruders in orchard or grove, also attack the willows. XAXyleutes Robinie, Harris., is said to attack the willow as well as the oak, locust and maple. The larve (which are pale greenish-white, and attain a length of two inches or more), instead of feeding upon the leaves, as do the preceding species, are true borers in the trunks or large limbs of trees, and, from the size of the burrows excavated by them, work great injury to the trees they infest. The next large group of moths is that of the Noctuide, the species of which, while more numerous, are also smaller and less conspicuous in their ornamentation. Apatela oblinita, Sm. Ab., the Smeared Dagger moth, is a modestly coloured moth (Fig. 28, c), but the caterpillar, which feeds also on apple, grape, etc., is very gaily coloured (Fig. 28, a), with bright yellow and crimson bands and spots upon a black ground. It pupates as shown in Fig. 28, b, in a thin cocoon attached to the stems of grass, etc., or loosely enclosed in a few leaves. Apatela Americana, Harris, the American Maple moth, whose larva feeds on maple, elm, willow, poplar, etc., is a paler and somewhat larger moth than the preceding. The caterpillar, when fully grown, is nearly two inches long. It is of a greenish black coour covered with yellowish hairs, and having two pencils of long erect black hairs on the fourth segment, and aiuther on the eleventh. 4 (En.) 50 The genus Catocala contains a large number of fine moths, expanding three or more inches, and having the hinder wings usually banded with red or yellow and black. The larve are curious flattened caterpillars about two inches long, tapering to each end, and having a fringe of fine hairs along the sides. When not feeding they rest upon the twigs in such a manner as enables them to very frequently escape detection. Two speeies, (. Parta, Guen., and C. Concwmbens, Walk., are recorded from willows. Fig. 29 shows. Catocala Ultronia, Hubn., a species which is sometimes found upon plum, as mentioned by Prof. Saunders in his “ Insects Injurious to Fruits.” Fie. 29, The last division of the Macro-Lepidoptera (or larger forms) is the Geometridx, the larvee of which are the “ loopers” or ‘‘ measuring worms,” so well known, and several of which are occasionally found upon willows. Among the Micro-Lepidoptera—those minute species (such as tne Olothes Moth). which are so numerous and so difficult to distinguish, except by entomologists who have specially studied them—there are many species feeding in or upon the galls produced by other insects, or in mines made in the leaves, When leaves are examined they will often be found to have white blotches upon them, or to be traversed by serpentine white streaks. Closer examination will show that these are internal injuries, produced by the eating away of the inner tissues of the leaf. The minute flattened larve will be often found in their burrows, and can be watched in their work of destruction. The habits of these small motbs are of interest. but cannot be dwelt upon now. 51 OoLEOPTERA. Of beetles feeding upon the willow we find the number of species to be but little. less than those of the Lepidoptera ; or more than half a hundred kinds which subsist at times upon the foliage or wood of these plants. Of these beetles more than two-thirds. belong to the Chrysomelide and Ourculionide, and these families include all the more destructive species. Of Buprestidae, beetles of the same family as Dicerca divaricata (Fig. 30), we find mention made of Buprestis /asciata, Fab., a beautiful insect of a bright green, with yellow markings upon the elytra. It is not a common beetle in this locality. I find very commonly during the summer upon foliage, three species of Agrilus, slender insects not exceeding- rs oa Fic. 30. Fie. 31. half an inch in length (see Fig. 31, Agrilus ruficollis, the raspberry borer), the larve of which bore under the bark of stems and branches. I have also found both upon the willow and poplar Pecilonota cyanipes, Say, which is one of our rarest Buprestids. Among the Scarabeide (the family to which the May-bugs belong) there are but few species to mention. The most common of these are Hoplia trifasciata, Say, and Serica sericea, Ill., both about one-third of an inch long, the former nearly black, or brownish with bands of golden pubescence, the latter a rich purplish or plum colour. Cotalpa lanigera, Linn, is a much larger beetle (Fig. 32) being nearly an inch long, It is of a broad oval form, and of a rich yellow or golden hue above, and coppery Fie. 32. beneath. The lower surface bears a thick coat of fine whitish hair, from which charac. teristic it has derived its specific name, lanigera, or wool-bearer. It is found throughout. a large part of Canada (although not occurring at Ottawa), and appears in May and, June, the beetles hiding during the day and feeding at night upon various kinds of trees, The eggs*are laid in the ground and the larve (Fig. 33), like those of many Scarabzids feed upon the roots of plants. Lucanus dama, Thunb., which belongs to the closely allied family Lucanide, or Stag beetles is a large, smooth, brown beetle found in various parts of Ontario, the males. of which have very long curved mandibles. The larve (Fig. 34) resemble in general appearance the “white grubs” of the May-beetles, and live in the trunks and roots of trees that have been injured or have commenced to decay. 52 Of the long-horned wood-boring beetles, the Cerambycide, the only species which -seems to infest the willow here is Saperda mutica, Say. It isa handsome beetle, about five-eighths of an inch in length, of a blackish colour, but more or less clothed, especially Fic. 34. ‘beneath, with an ochreous or tawny pubescence, There is a bright stripe of this pubes cence on the head ; the thorax has three bands, one on the back and one on each side, and the elytra are prettily mottled. The habits of this beetle are not, so far as I know, recorded, but I think it undoubtedly a borer in our native willows, upon which I have taken it (on one occasion in the act of copulating) in June and July. This beetle belongs to an interesting genus, of which there are thirteen American species, all of which occur in Ontario, and the habits of which are well known to be very injurious to various trees. 8S. calcarata, to which mutica is very near, is the poplar borer ; candida (Fig. 35) is the apple tree borer; Yayi attacks the small limbs of thorns ; cretata has been destructive to apple trees ; vestita is the common enemy of the basswood, Fig. 35. and also attacks the European linden, which is planted as a shade tree in many towns in Ontario ; discoidea bores severely in hickories ; tridentata and lateralis attack the elm ;. puncticollis infests grape vines and probably the Virginia creeper; moesta produces un- sightly gall-like swellings on the limbs of poplars , and concolor, the last of the species, is another inhabitant of the willows. The habits of Saperda concolor are described by Dr. Hamilton in a paper which will be found in Ann. Report No. xvitr. The larve bore in the canes of Salix longifolia, often causing their death the following year. The Chrysomelid is a family of beetles which contains a great many species, mostly of small size, but often doing great damage to vegetation by their immense numbers ; feeding for the most part, both in the larval and perfect stages, upon foliage. In appear- ance the larve and beetles of the larger species much resemble the Colorado potato-beetle, the different stages of which are well shown in Fig. 36: 3, b, 6, larve at different stages : c, the pupa ; d, d, the beetle. Chrysomela Bigsbyana, Kirby, and C. spiree, Say, are two species found upon native willows. They are not quite so large as the potato-beetle and are more prettily marked, having the head and thorax bronzed or greenish, and the wing-covers pale with sutural lines and scattered dots of brown. The larve are pale, stout grubs, feeding upon the leaves of various plants. 53 ee Anomea latielavia, Forst, is sometimes abundant in June and July. It is about; one-quarter of an inch long and half as wide ; the abdomen, legs and antenne blackish ; the head, thorax and elytra, yellow, with a broad, purplish black stripe at the junction of the latter. The forelegs of the male are very much longer than those of the female, a, very uncommon feature of our Chrysomelide. Of the genera Pachybrachys, Diachus, Paria, etc., there are several species alway: abundant upon the foliage of willows, and all small cylindrical beetles, one-eighth of an inch or less in length, and often prettily colored. Another group of abundant and injurious beetles is composed of small species‘having- the posterior legs greatly developed, and, consequently, jumping with the greatest agility. Their saltatorial powers have earned for them the term flea-beetles. The larger species, Disonycha alternata, Ul., and D. punctigera, Say, are yellowish above, with black stripes. on the wing-covers, and are one-fourth or one-fifth of an inch long. The smaller ones. belonging to C'repidodera, etc., are usually uniformly coloured bronze, green or bluish, an@ may be readily recognized as relatives of the common flea-beetles which injure grapes, turnips, cucumbers, etc. Fig. 37 shows the grape-vine flea-beetle, Graptodera chalybea, and its larve riddling a leaf. 54 Galeruca decora, Say, is a beetle slightly larger than the grape-vine flea-beetle, and ‘of the same shape, but has not the hind legs formed for leaping. Prof. Riley (Rept. U. S. Entomologist, 1884) states as follows of this species in connection with insect attacks upon willows near Washington: “The most numerous and most dangerous of these enemies is, beyond question, the Willow Galeruca (Galeruca decora, Say), of which young larva and imagos were met with everywhere on the leaves. . . . Full grown larve were not found early in June, and only a few egg clusters Next in number comes Colaspis tristis, which in the imago state preferably feeds upon the very young, not yet fully developed leaves. Its larva, which no doubt has subterranean habits, was not met with, and it probably feeds on the roots of some other plants.” Lina lapponica, Linn., is a dark yellowish beetle, with black dots upon the elytra» much resembling in size and shape Diabrotica 12-punctata, Oliv. (see Fig. 38), but having ‘the thorax wider and the spots upon the elytra more numerous. The larve feed upon willow and alder, and are of a dingy yellowish white colour, with black head and legs, and have upon the back and sides rows of small dusky tubercules which exude drops of a disagreeable secretion when the larvz are disturbed. This species varies greatly in colour and the specimens I have bred were generally paler than those captured in the imago condition. The remaining beetles all belong to the Rhynchophora or “ beak-bearing ” division of the Coleoptera, and nearly all to the extensive family Curculionide. The larve of these weevils are short, fleshy, whitish grubs, feeding upon various portions of plants, and generally concealed in cells or short burrows, so that they are seldom discovered until their operations have been some time in progress. The largest of about twenty species which I have found upon willows is Lepyrus geminatus, Say ; sometimes it appears quite abundantly, but never upon other plants, The habits of the larve are not known to me, but in all probability they infest the roots of the trees upon which the beetles are found. The beetle is a little over one-half an inch long, with a stout beak, equalin length to the thorax. The general colour is greyish ; the thorax has an orange line on each side, and there is a dot of the same colour on each elytron near the middle. Of Apion and Anthonomus there are several small species, either black or mod- estly coloured. Some of thesebreed in the galls made by the saw-flies and midges before described, and the habits of others are not yet fully known. There are also species belonging to genera allied to Anthonomus, including a number of species of the genus Orchestes. These little weevils correspond to the flea-beetles of the Chrysomelide, as they have the posterior legs enlarged, and possess great jumping powers. The_ beetles feed upon the leaves, of which they riddle the epidermis with numerous small holes. The habits of the larve are not known to me. The most abundant species is O. pallicornis, an entirely black insect, and another which is sometimes abundant is O. rujipes, which is Smaller, and has, as its name denotes, red or yellowish legs. HEMIPTERA. Of the “ bugs,” properly so-called, ten or fifteen species, including some Aphides or plant-lice, are recorded in my notes, but as the extent of their ravages, and their life- histories are imperfectly known to me, I shall not give any account of them in this paper. In conclusion it may be stated that my object in this paper has not been to give a complete catalogue of all the species of insects found upon the various willows, or to describe them minutely. It has been rather to give a general idea of the great number of these depredators, and the different classes to which they belong. To have given the name, description and complete history of every species would have made this a “much too long, and too technical for the general readers of this Report, and would also 55 ee have required an amount of time which was not in my power to bestow upon its prepar- tion. In Bulletin No. 7 of the U. S. Entomological Division, prepared by Dr. Packard, in 1881, upon the Insects Injurious to forest and shade trees, there are enumerated one hundred species infesting the willows. Those recorded in my own notes, and the records made by other entomologists which I have been able to examine while writing this paper increase the number to at least two hundred. Even this large list would probably be almost doubled, if careful observations were made in all parts of the country, for in Europe four hundred species are known to feed upon the various willows. INSECTS INJURIOUS TO THE OAk. BY F. B, CAULFIELD, MONTREAL, P. Q. If we examine a tree during the summer months it will generally be found abund- antly tenanted by insects, some resting upon the trunk and larger limbs, while numbers may be observed upon the leaves, either sleeping or busily engaged devouring them, or else converting them into dwellings to afford them shelter from the storms and rains, or to conceal them from the numerous enemies who are constantly seeking for them. Every portion of the tree has its insect guests, each quietly and effectually performing its alloted task. It seems to be a law of nature that the old and weak must give place to the young and vigorous, hence a tree that has been unable to withstand the storm, or has been injured in any way, is speedily attacked by insects, conspicuous amongst them being the long-horned beetles, Cerambycidae ; these bore into and tunnel it in all direc- tions, permitting the air and moisture to enter, thus hastening its decay, and soon the massive trunk moulders and crumbles into dust, allowing a fresh growth to spring up and fill its place. In this way, so long as the forest is left in its natural condition the insects perform a good work. But when man steps in and the forest gives place to the orchard and the trees are reserved or planted for shade or ornament, the case is different, -and it behoves us to study the habits of the insect inhabitants so that we may not con- found the good with the evil, that we may know the times of their appearance and the particular manner in which the different species work, in order that we may be prepared to take effective measures to exterminate such as are injurious, and protect and foster those which are beneficial. I have, in this article, endeavored to give a brief account of some insects known to injure oak trees, (Quercus) drawing freely upon those entomologists who have contributed so largely to our knowledge of the subject. INJURING THE TRUNK. 1. Tue Locust Carpenter Motu. Xyleutes robinie (Harris.) OrpER LEpPIpOv- — TERA, FAMILY, BOMBYCIDAE. This is probably the most injurious insect attacking the red oak, and is equally de- structive to the locust and several species of poplar. The female measures about three inches across the expanded wings, the front wings are grey marked with a network of dusky lines and spots, the hind wings are dusky, and darker at the base. The male is much smaller, and his front wings are darker than those of the female, the hind wings are black, with a large ochre-yellow spot. Dr. Harris states that the moths come forth about the middle of July. Dr. Fitch gives June and the forepart of July as the time of their appearance, the latter agrees with my own experience. During the day the moths remain quiet upon the trees, indeed I doubt that the female ever flies to any great dis- tance, as her body is so large and unwieldy, owing to the number of eggs with which it 56 is distended, that protracted flight would appear almost impossible. and by the time the eggs are deposited she is exhausted and incapable of much exertion. The male, however, flies strongly and with great swiftness. Some years since a balsam poplar growing in front of my windows was badly injured by this insect, which along with Saperda masta, killed it in a few years. Upon one occasion, early in the afternoon, a male flew from the tree, although the sun was shining brightly at the time ; it appeared, however, to be confused, as it settled on the road about twenty feet from the tree. Immediately after sunset the males made their apearance, flying swiftly up and down the street ; after dashing past the tree a few times they would circle around it, and finally make their way up amongst the limbs at their junction with the trunk, where no doubt the females were resting. On several occasions females were attracted by light, blunder- ing in with a heavy labouring flight ; the males appeared to be indifferent to it as none entered the house. Dr. Fitch states that this is a most prolific insect, a specimen that he obtained having extruded upwards of three hundred eggs within a few hours of its capture. The eggs are of a broad oval form and about the size of a grain of wheat, being the tenth of an inch in length and three-fourths as thick, of a dirty white color with one of the ends black. When highly magnified their surface is seen to be reticulated or occupied by numerous slightly impressed dots, arranged in rows like the meshes ina net. From observing her motions in confinement I think the female does not insert her eggs in the bark but merely drops them into cracks and crevices upon its outer surface. They are coated with a glutinous matter which immediately dries and hardens on exposure to the air, whereby they adhere to the spot where they touch. (Fitch.) As soon as hatched the young caterpillar burrows into the tree, at first feeding upon the soft inner bark, but as it grows it sinks deeper, finally penetrating to the solid heart wood. When about to assume the chrysalis form it changes the direction of its burrow, working outwards until it reaches the bark, lining the passage with silk, then going back a little distance it spins a cocoon and changes to a chrysalis. The caterpillar is of a reddish color above, the head is black, while before pupating it changes color to white, tinged with pale green. When fully grown it measures two inches and a half or more in length and ig nearly as thick as the end of the little finger. (Harris.) The chrysalis is an inch and three-quarters long and is of a chestnut color, the fore- part darkest. On the upper side of each segment of the abdomen there is a row of tooth- like projections, by means of which when about to disclose the moth, the chrysalis pushes itself forward until partly out of the tree. The moth now ruptures the chrysalis and creeps out, leaving the empty shell sticking in the mouth of the burrow. As it is very difficult to see the moths when resting on the trees, any attempt to re- duce their number by handpicking would be useless, but coating the trunks with soft soap in the early part of June would probably prevent the moth from laying her eggs on them, and any tree known to be badly infested should be cut down and burnt. Another species, the Xyleutes querciperda of Fitch, also attacks the oak but appears to be much less com- mon than the robiniz. 2. The Thunderbolt Beetle, Arhopalus fulminans (Fabr.) ORDER COLEOPTERA > Famity CERAMBYCIDZ. This pretty beetle is blackish brown, with slight dark-blue reflections ; the legs and antepnz are of the same colour, the latter being scarcely longer than the body. The top. of the head and the sides of the prothorax and under side of the body are covered with pale gray pile, while certain silver markings on the wing-cover are composed of similar close-~ set fine hairs. The hairs on the sides of the prothorax enclose a conspicuous black spot, while the top is black and more closely punctate than the wing-covers. The latter are each crossed, by four acutely zigzag lines composed of microscopic hairs, forming W—like bands on the elytra; the basal lines being less distinctly marked than the others. The ends of the wing-covers are also tipped with gray, especially on the inner side of the end. The legs are pitchy brown with light hairs, and with a reddish tinge on the terminal joints (tarsi). It is a little over half an inch long. (Packard). Or Cj Dr. Fitch states that the larva ‘‘excavates a burrow in the soft-sap-wood about 3 a tah and 0.20 in diameter, this burrow having the shape of a much bent bow or a letter U.” It changes toa pupa in the same cell, the beetle apearing in July. (Packard.) In the latter part of June 1871 I found numerous specimens of this beetle on a red oak that had been blown down on Montreal mountain. They were busily engaged trav- elling backward and forward along the trunk in search of partners. [ observed several pairs mated. Copulaticn was of short duration and was frequently repeated, the female occasion- ally dropping an egg in a crevice of the bark, no incision being made for its reception. They appeared to keep altogether to the upper surface of the main trunk, none being seen on the sides, under surface or even the larger branches. This species in some of its habits resembles the locust borer Cyllene robinia, (Harr.) That species however, drops its eggs in clusters of seven or eight together, according to Dr. Harris, while A. fulminans, as observed my me, certainly only deposited a single egg ata time. Dr Harris believed that C. robiniew completed its transformations in one year, and this I believe is the case with A. fulminans also. The tree that I observed them on, had apparently not been attacked up to the time it had been blown down in 1871, as it appeared to be perfectly sound and healthy and was in full leaf. I examined it several times in June and July 1872, but did not tind a single beetle either on or about it, but there were plenty of holes showing where they had escaped. In 1873 I found several specimens, also on a red oak; this tree was standing, but the top branches were dead and a few years finished it. Dr. Packard states that this species has been found attacking the chestnut (Castanea vesca) by Mr. R. B. Grover. 3. Tae Nosie Crytus, Calloides nobilis, (Harris). ORDER CoLEopTERa ; FaMIty CERAMBYCIDE :— This fine beetle measures almost an inch in length; it is ofa dark blackish brown color, the wing-covers marked with two spots and three broken lines of yellow, I took five specimens at the same time and place as A. fulminans, two on the tree und the re- mainder close beside it, and although I did not find it ovipositing I am satisfied that it attacks the oak. Dr. Packard states that it has boen found beneath the bark of the chestnut at Providence by Mr. George Hunt, and as A. fulminans bores in both chestnut and oak I think there is little doubt but that (. nobilis does the same. Moreover the chestnuts are not found at Montreal so far as I am aware, so that the oak is probably its only food plant in Eastern Canada. 4, Tue Common Oak Borer, Hylotrechus colonus, (Fabr). ORDER COLEOPTERA ; FaMILy CERAMBYCIDE :— Length half an inch, color dark reddish brown, two narrow undulated pale grey bands at base of wing-covers. End of wing covers pale grey, enclosing two round dark brown spots. Under surface dark brown with two round yellow spots. Abdominal seg- ments margined with yellow. Legs and antenne reddish brown. Dr. Packard states that he has found “the larva of this pretty beetle in abundance mining under the bark of a fallen (probably white) oak near Providence, May 26th several pupz also occurred, one transforming to the beetle May 27th. The mine extends up and down the trunk and is of the usual form of Longicorn mines, being a broad, shallow, irregular, sinuous bur- row, and extending part of the way around the trunk, the diameter near the end of the burrow being 5 m.m.” I found several specimens of this beetle along with the preceding species, but all were quietly resting beneath the trunk, (the tree was lying on a bank of earth torn up with the roots and on the larger limbs, leaving the trunk clear of the ground). Dr. Packard states that Mr. George Hunt has found this species under the bark of an old sugar maple, and it has been found running on dead hickory by Mr. W. H. Har- rington. 58 5. Tue Oak Bark Borer, Urographis fasciatus. (De Geer.) ORDER COLEOPTERA ; Faxwity CERAMBYCIDE :— The grub of this beetle feeds on the inner bark of the oak, transforming to a long- horned slightly flattened beetle, of a yellowish grey color, thickly covered with dark spots and dashes. The female is provided with a straight awl-like ovipositor, nearly as long as her body with which she perforates the bark when depositing her eggs. “The worms from these eggs mine their burrows mostly lengthwise of the grain or fibre of the bark, and the channels which they excavate are so numerous and so filled with worm dust of the same color with the bark that it is difficult to trace them. The eggs are deposited the latter part of June, and the worms grow to their full size by the end of the season, and will be found during the winter and spring, lying in the inner layers of the bark, in a small oval flattened cavity which is usually at the larger end of the track which they have travelled.” (Fitch). I have taken this species on the red oak, at Montreal, quite commonly. 6. THE AppLe FLAT-HEADED Borer, Chrysobothris femorata, (Fabr.) ORDER COLE- OPTERA ; FamiLty BuPRESTIDZ :— The larve belonging to this family present an appearance somewhat resembling a tadpole, (Fig. 39, a. and c.) the second segment behind the head being enormously en- larged, while the remaining segments are much smaller. The species under consideration bores under the bark and in the sapwood of various trees, the apple and white oak in par- ticular. “The beetle (d) measures from four to five tenths of an inch in length ”; it is of a greenish black color, polished and shining, with the surface rough and uneven. The head and sometimes the thorax and the depressed portions of the elytra are of a dull coppery color. The elytra or wing-covers present a much more rough and unequal sur- face than any other part of the insect. Three smooth and polished raised lines extend lengthwise on each wing-cover and the intervals between them are in places occu- pied by smaller raised lines, whick form a kind of network, and two impressed transverse spots may also be discerned more or less distinctly, dividing each wing-cover into three nearly equal portions. The under surface of the body and the legs are brilliant coppery.” (Fitch). Bores in the white (and probably other species of) oak, also in apple and peach trees. 7. Tue Rep Oak Fiat-HEADED Borer, Chrysobothris dentipes. (Germar.) ORDER CoxreopTeraA ; Famrty Buprestip&# :— Very closely resembles the preceding species but is smaller. I found it common on red oak in the early part of June, very active, and taking wing readily when alarmed. 59 8. Tue NortTHEeRN BrentTHIAN, Lupsalis Minuta, (Drury). ORDER COLEOPTERA ; FamILy Brenroip& :— This curious beetle is of a rich mahogany brown color; the wing-covers are clouded with darkish brown deeply furrowed and marked with narrow yellow spots; the thorax ‘or neck is smooth and polished and in shape somewhat resembles an egg, the small end nearest the head. The snout or beak projects straight in front, an exception to the gen- ‘eral form, most weevils having it curved or bent abruptly down. It measures from a quarter to over half an inch in length, the males generally being the largest. (Fig 40 represents the insect in all its stages.) The female bores a hole in the bark and dropping an egg in it, pushes it well in with her beak. It requires about a day to make a puncture and deposit the egy. During the time the puncture is being made the male stands guard, oocasionally assisting the female in extracting her beak ; this he does by stationing himself at a right angle with her body and by pressing his heavy prosternum against the tip of her abdomen ; her stout fore-legs serving as a fulcrum and her long body asa lever. When the beak is extracted the fe- male uses her antennz for freeing the pinchers or jaws of bits of wood or dust, the antenne being furnished with stiff hairs and forming an excellent brush. Should a strange male approach, a heavy contest at once ensues, and continues until one or the other is thrown from the tree. The successful party then takes his station as guard. (W. R. Howard in Riley’s 6th Report.) Attacks various species of oak, the larve boring into the solid wood. 9. Tue Gray-sipep Oak WeeviL, Pandeletejus hilaris, ORDER COLEOPTERA 3 FAMILY CURCULIONIDE :— «A little pale-brown beetle, variegated with grey upon the sides. Its snout is short, broad and slightly furrowed in the middle. There are three blackish stripes on the _ thorax, bet» een which are two of a light grey color; the wing-covers have a broad stripe of light grey on the outer side, edged within by a slender blackish line, and sending two short oblique branches almost across each wing-cover, and the fore-legs are larger than the others. The length of this beetle varies from one-eighth to one-fifth of an inch. The larva lives in the trunks of the white oak, on which the beetles may be found about the Jast of May or beginning of June.” (Harris). 10. Tae Oak Bark Weevit, Magdalis olyra. (Herbst). ORDER COLEOPTERA ; Famity CurcuLionip& :— : Dr. Packard states that he found this species on the red oak “occurring in all stages under the bark in May, transforming into a black weevil with the surface of the body punctured, the thorax with a lateral tubercle on the front edge, while the tarsi are brown, with whitish hairs, } inch long. 60 11. Toe Wauire Oak Puymaropes, Phymatodes variabilis, (Fabr.) Orpugr, CoLuoPrTerRA; Famity, CERAMBYCID. ‘Boring the trunk and branches of the oak, a narrow longicorn larva, changing to a reddish thick-bodied longicorn beetle.”---(Packard.) Length about half an inch, body and legs reddish, head black, wing-covers Prussian blue. Dr. Packard states that numerous specimens of this beetle were taken by Mr. Alfred Poor from a white oak stick, June 20th. 12. Toe Wuitre Heapep PuymatopEs, Phymatodes varius, (Fabr.) ORDER, OoLeorTera ; FamILy, CERAMBYCID. « A long-horned beetle, 0.25 in length or slightly less, and about a third as broad, somewhat flattened, clothed with fine erect grey hairs, its wing-covers with two distinct slender white bands which do not reach the suture, the anterior one more slender than the hind one and curved ; the antenne and slender portions of the legs usually chestnut colored. Several specimens of this beetle were met with the last of May, in the trunk of a black oak, in which it is probable their younger state had been passed.”—(Fitch.) Dr. Packard states that he found near Providence, several of these beetles of both sexes, running in and out of a pile of oak cordwood in the forest, May 30th, which was. cut the previous winter. InsuRING THE Roots. 13. Toe Zepra Lepturian, Leptura zebra, (Olivier.) ORDER, CoLEOPTERA ; FamILy, CERAMBYCID2. Length about half an inch, general color bright golden yellow, upper surface of thorax marked with a transverse crescent shaped spot of black. Wing-covers black, crossed by four yellow bands, under surface yellow, legs and antenne red. I took a number of these beautiful longicorns on or about the same red oak on which A fulminans was so abundant. They were very shy and active, taking flight on the least alarm, so that it was difficult to watch an individual for any length of time. The bank of turf and earth torn up by the matted roots, appeared to be especially attractive to them, as most of those taken were found there. On two occasions I observed females entering cavities where the earth had been worn away from the roots, but they followed their windings too far down to allow me to see what they were about. Their actions led me to believe that they oviposit on the larger roots; when disturbed they ran out and flew away. According to Dr. Packard, Dr. Horn states that the larva and pupa. inhabit the black oak, injuring the branches. 14. Toe Oak Pruner, Llaphidion villosum, (Fabr.) ORDER, COLEOPTERA; FAMILy, CERAMBYCID. This insect has been given its popular name on account of the manner in which the grub or larva cuts away the wood of the branch in which it is boring, thus weakening it so that it is liable to be broken off by the autumn winds. The earlier writers on this insect were of the opinion that ‘The limb thus wounded would become too dry for the maintenance of the soft-bodied larva, hence, it must be felled to the ground, where in the wet and under the snows of winter, it would remain sufficiently moist for the existence of the insect, which completes its transformations within.” The investi- gations of Messrs. Olarkson and Hamilton have shown that moisture is not necessary for the development of the beetle. These gentlemen having obtained numerous specimens from branches kept within doors. No doubt the pruning of the branch is instinctively done in order to stop the flow of sap, and thus obtain a supply of dead wood ; the same end is obtained by the hickory borer, Oncideres cingulatus, but in a different manner; in this case the girdling or pruning being done by the adult insect, and from the outside of the branch. 61 The mature insect (fig. 41) is a slender elongated, dark brown, long horned beetle, the wing-covers more or less marked with grey spots. Dr. Hamilton states that they vary in length from 8 to 18 m. m.; in pubescence some being nearly naked and uncolored, others having it longer and condensed into spots or almost vittate, some being quite slender and elongate, while others are short and broad; the surface of the elytra is mostly uni- form, but in some, especia]ly such as are narrow and elongated, one or two cost are more or less evident. Dr. Fitch states that “The larva (fig. 42) grows to a length of Fig, 41. Fie. 42. Fic. 43. 0.60, and is then 0.15 across its neck where it is broadest.. It tapers slightly from its neck backwards, the hind part of its body being nearly cylindrical. It is a soft or fleshy grub, somewhat shining and of a white color, often slightly tinged with yellow, its head which is small and retracted into the neck, being black in front.” The earlier writers on this insect state that the parent beetle deposits an egg close to the axil of a leaf stock, or of a small twig near the extremity of a branch, and that the grub tunnels its way downwards into the branch, when half grown gnawing away the wood so that it breaks off with the wind. Dr. Hamilton who has bred numbers of this species states that “The normal period of metamorphosis is three years, but in individuals it may be retarded to four or more years. How the larva got under the bark could’ not be asc2rtained, When first examined in April, they were from 4 to 5 m.m. long. They ate the wood under the bark, following its grain, and packed their burrows solidly with their dust. Their growth and progress were both slow, for by the next Aprii they had scarcely more than doubled in length, and had not travelled more than from four to six inches during the year; but after July they developed an enormous appetite, and con- sumed the wood for at least one inch in length, and often entirely around the limb. ejecting their castings through holes made in the bark. When full fed they bore obliquely an oval hole into the wood, penetrating it from four to ten inches. The _larva then packs the opening with fine castings, and enlarges a couple of inches of the interior of the burrow by gnawing off its sides a quantity of coarse fibre, in which it lies after turning its head to the entrance (as shown in fig. 43). The time spent in the pupal state is indefinite, and does not seem to concern greatly the time of the appearance of the beetle. Sticks split open at different periods from December till March, contained larva and pupa about equally, but no developed beetles. A larva that I observed to go into the wood in April appeared as a beetle among first of such as had presumably pupated in the fall. The most of the beetles appeared during the first two weeks of June, though individuals occurred occasionally till September.” Mr. T. C. Clarkson who has bred this beetle from oak, speaks of it as follows: *‘ These oak pruners were very abundant in Columbia County, this state (New York), in the season of 1878. The September winds brought showers of twigs and branches -to the ground. I examined many of them, and found such to contain the larva nearly full grown, in tunnels measuring from ten to fifteen inches long. I gathered 62 five goodly sized branches just after they had fallen, for the purpose of illustrating the burrows in my cabinet of nest architecture. The branches remained on a table in a room having very nearly the conditions thermometrically of the temperature without, until the early part of November, when I opened them for the purpose already stated. I was astonished to find that every burrow contained the beetle. The trans{ormation therefore from the larva to the imago was completed in less thau eight weeks.” Mr. Clarkson repeated the experiment the following season, collecting in October seven branches that had been pruned by the same insect. The imagoes appeared on the following days: November 14th, 22nd, 26th, 29th, December 9th and 26th, all females. ‘‘ As the imagoes appeared they were examined and replaced in their tunnels, where they now remain in a passive state, and are not likely to exhibit their natural activity until next May or June.” From these accounts it will be seen that the insects inhabiting the oak differ some-: what in habit from those found in hickory ; the former completing their transformations in the fall, while the latter passed the winter either as larva or pupa. Continued observations will be necessary to determine if such is always the case, and to clear up other doubtful points in the history of this curious insect. Although called the oak pruner, it is not confined to that tree, as it also attacks chestnut, apple, plum, ete, 15. Tae SEVENTEEN YEAR Cicapa, Cicada Septemdecim, Linn. ORDER HEMIPTERA ; FamiLy CICADARIA. This insect when mature (Fig. 44, c) “is of a black color with transparent wings and wing-covers, the thick anterior edge and larger veins of which are orange red, and near the tips of the latter there is a dusky zigzag line in the form of the ietter W ; the eyes when living are also red ; the rings of the body are edged with dull orange, and the Fig. 44. egs are of the same colour, The wings expand 2} to 3h inches.”—(Harris.) The female is provided with an awl shaped ovipositor or piercer, consisting of “two sharp saws which work alternately, and a central supporting dorsal piece which holds them in their place and strengthens them.” After pairing the females proceed to prepare a nest (Fig. 44, d) for the reception of their eggs. ‘They select for this purpose branches of a moderate size, which they clasp on both sides with their legs, and then bending down the piercer at an angle of about forty-five degrees they repeatedly thrust it obliquely into the bark and wood in the direction of the fibres, at the same time putting in motion the lateral saws, and in this. 63 way detach little splinters of the wood at one end so as to form a kind of fibrous lid or cover to the perforation. The hole is bored obliquely to the pith and is gradually enlarged by a repetition of the same operation till a longitudinal fissure is formed of sufticient extent to receive from ten to twenty eggs. The side pieces of the piercer serve as a groove to convey the eggs into the nest, where they are deposited in pairs, side by side, but separated from each other by a portion of woody fibre, and they are implanted into the limb somewhat obliquely, so that one end points upwards. When two eggs have been thus placed, the insect withdraws the piercer for a moment and then inserts it again and drops two more eggs in a line with the first, and repeats the operation till she has filled the fissure from one end to the other,:apon which she removes to a little distance and begins to make another nest to contain two more rows of eggs. She is about fifteen minutes in preparing a single nest and filling it with eggs, but it is not unusual for her to make fifteen or twenty fissures in the same limb, and one observer counted fifty nests, extending along in a line, each containing fifteen or twenty eggs in two rows, and all of them apparently the work of one insect. After one limb is thus stocked, the Cicada goes to another, and passes from limb to limb, and from tree to tree, till her store, which consists of from four to five hundred eggs, is exhausted. The eggs (Fig. 44, ¢) are one-twelfth of an inch long and one-sixteenth of an inch through the middle, but taper at each end to an obtuse point, and are of a pearl-white color. The young insect when it bursts the shell is one-sixteenth of an inch long, and is of a yellowish-white color, except the eyes and claws which are reddish, and is covered with little hairs. In form it is somewhat grub-like, being longer in proportion than the parent insect, and is furnished with six legs, the first pair of which are very large, shaped almost like lobster claws, and armed with strong spines beneath. On the shoulders are little prominences in place of wings, and under the breast is a long beak for suction.” (Harris.) As soon as hatched the young Cicada lets itself fall from the limb and immediately buries itself in the earth, burrowing by means of its mole-like fore feet. “The larva (Fig. 44, a) obtains its food from the small vegetable radicles that every- where pervade the fertile earth. It takes its food from the surface of these roots, con- sisting of the moist exudation (like animal perspiration), for which purpose its rostrum or snout is provided with three exeeedingly delicate capillaries or hairs which project from the tube of the snout, and sweep over the surface gathering up the minute drops of moisture. This is its only food. The mode of taking it can be seen by a good lass (Dr. Smith in Prairie Farmer.) The females appear to prefer oak and hickory, but will oviposit in many other trees and shrubs, sometimes causing serious injury, especially to. young trees, as the following extract from the Valley Farmer will show: ‘We planted an orchard of the best varieties of apple trees last spring. We had taken particular pains, not only in selecting the best varieties, but in planting the trees, and hoped in a few years to partake of the fruit. But our hopes were destined to be blasted. The locusts. (Cicadas) during the summer destroyed nearly all of them; not one in six is living. To look at them one would think that some one had been drawing the teeth of a saw over the bark of every tree.” Various applications have been tried on the trees, but without appearing to prevent the females depositing their eggs ; but numbers of the insects may be crushed in the early morning and in the evening, as at these times they are not nearly so active as during the warmer parts of the day, and when issuing from the ground hogs and poultry devour them eagerly. Although included in our lists of Canadian insects, the seventeen year Cicada appears to be very rare in Canada, and so far as known to me has not been. observed in the Province of Quebec. 16. THe WHITE-LINED TREE Hopper, Thalia univittata, (Harris). Orper Hemp TERA; FamMILY MEMBRACIDAE. This insect is about four-tenths of an inch in length, the thorax is brown, has a short obtuse horn, extending obliquely upwards from its forepart, and there is a white line on the back, extending from the top of the horn to the hinder extremity.— (Harris, ) Common on oak trees in July according to Harris. 64 INJURING THE LEAVES. 17. Toe Tent CATERPILLARS, Clisiocampa distria, Hubnr, and C. Americana, Harris. OrpER LEPIDOPTERA ; FAMILY BoOMBYCID. i As these insects have been already described and figured in this report, a detailed description is unnecessary (see Figs. 1-5). Unfortunately both species are only too common, C. distria chiefly affecting forest trees, C. Americana being most abundant in the orchard and garden. Neither species is very particular in its choice of food plant, feeding voraciously on the leaves of many kinds of trees and shrubs ; indeed, both species may often be seen clustered together in groups upon the trunks and larger limbs. The eaterpillars resemble each other very closely, but may easily be distinguished by C. distria having a row of oval white spots along the back, while C. Americana has a white stripe on the upper surface. The reddish brown moths appear in July, and soon deposit their eggs in rings on the smaller branches and twigs, each cluster containing from two to three hundred eggs! A surprising point in the life-history of these insects is that about a month after the eggs are laid the young caterpillar is fully formed inside the egg and remains in this condition all through. the winter, only eating its way out from the egg in the following spring, when the leaves expand.—( Fletcher.) Duting the winter months, when the trees are bare of leaves, the clusters of eggs should be collected and burnt. The trees should be searched again in spring, just as the buds are opening, when the small white webs in which the young caterpillars shelter themselves may be easily found and destroyed, An invasion from neighbouring trees can be prevented by tying a strip of cotton_ batting round the trunk, which the caterpillars have difficulty in climbing over.—(Fletcher. 18. THE ORANGE STRIPED OAK CATERPILLAR, Anisota senatoria, Hubn. ORDER LEPIDOPTERA ; Famity BoMByYcID2. The caterpillar of this moth measures about two inches in length ; it is black, with four yellow stripes along the back, and two on the sides ; it is armed with sharp prickles or spines, and on the top of the second segment are two long slender spines that project forward like horns. The caterpillars are social, feeding together in swarms on the white and red oak, sometimes almost stripping the trees. When full grown they enter the ground, where they change to chrysalis, the moths emerging the following summer. It has been taken in the neighbourhood of Montreal by Mr. P. Knetzing, and has been observed at Hull, Ottawa, by Mr. W. H. Harrington, and is, I believe, common in some parts of Ontario. 19. Tae Lear-RoLtuinc WEEVIL, Attelabus bipustulatus, Fabr. ORDER COLEOPTERA ; Famity ATTELABIDA. This beetle measures a little over one-eighth of an inch in length; it is of a blue- black colour, with a red spot on the shoulder of each wing cover. This beetle has the curious habit of rolling up a leaf, trimming and tucking in the lower ends with her beak. The egg is first deposited near the tip of the leaf, and a little to one side ; the blade of the leaf is then cut through on both sides of the mid-rib, about an inch and a half below a row of punctures on each side of the mid-rib of the severed portion, which facilitates folding the leaf together, upper surface inside, after which the folded leaf is tightly rolled up from the apex to the transverse cut, bringing the egg in the centre ; the concluding opera- tion is the tucking in and trimming off the irregularities of the ends. A few days after completion the cases, first observed the latter part of April, drop to the ground; by May 15 several larvee hatched and fed on the dry substance of their nests ; and by the end of May they pupated within the nest. This state lasted from five to seven days, the first beetles issuing by June 2, while a second brood of larva may be found early in July,— (Martfelt. ) 65 INJURING THE ACORNS. 20. Toe Acorn WeeviL, Balaninus rectus, Say. OrpER CoLEoPTERA; FAMILY CURCULIONIDAE. The larva of this beetle lives in the acorns of the red (and probably other kinds of) oak ; it is a short, stout, footless grub, of a whitish color. In the fall, by which time it is full grown, it cuts a circular hole in the side of the acorn, through which it escapes ; it then burrows in the earth, emerging the following season as a small, long-snouted, brownish beetle, obscurely mottled with spots of a lighter color. Common in Canada. 21. THe Acorn Morn, Holcocera glanduella, Riley. OrpreR LepipoprERa ; Faminy TINEIDAE. The acorns that have been deserted by the weevil are selected by this little moth as @ fitting abode for her offspring, and the little hole so nicely cut by the grub of the beetle provides her with a convenient opening, by means of which she is able to deposit an egg within the acorn. From this egg hatches a tiny, slender, grayish-white caterpillar, with a light brown head, and blue-black marks on the upper surface. The moth is silvery gray, marked with reddish brown ; the hind wings darker grayish brown. The following insects also live on the oak :— Papilio turnus, Linn. Limenitis ursula, Fabr. Limenitis dissippus Linn. Thecla calanus, Hubn. Thanaos brizo, Boisd & Leconte. Thanaos ennius, Scudder. Phryganidea Oalifornica, Packard. (Destructive to oaks, H. Edwards.) Halesidota maculata, Harris. (On oak, Saunders.) Orgyia gulosa, Edwards. (Edwards in Papilio 1, p. 61.) Parorgyia Clintonii, Grote and Robinson. Coquillet in Can, Ent. xii., 44. Phobetron pithecium, Smith and Abbot. (Bred from oak, Lintner.) Euclea monitor, Packard. Euclea querceti, H. S. Euclea quercicola, H. S. Edema albifrons, Smith and Abbot. (Harris correspondence, p. 304.) Nadata gibbosa, Smith and Abbott. (Harris correspondence, p. 308.) Anisota stigma, Hubn. (On oak, Riley.) Anisota pellucida, Hubn. (On different species of oak, French.) Telea polyphemus, Linn. Hyperchiria io, Fat. Hemileuca maia, Drury. (On oak, Riley, Lintner.) Gastropacha Californica, Packard. (On oak, Quercus agricolea, H. Edwards.) Heterocampa pulverea, Grote and Robinson. (On red and scarlet oaks, French.) Clisiocampa Californica, Packard, (on oak, Stretch.) Clisiocampa constricta, Stretch (On Quercus sonomensis, Benth. Stretch.) Cosmia orina, Guen. (On oak, Saunders.) Catocala ilia, Cramer, (On oak, Saunders.) . Catocala coccinata Grote, (Coquillet in Papilio 1. p. 56.) Paraphia unipunctaria, Haworth, (On oak, Fitch.) Aplodes mimosaria Guen. (On oak, Walsh.) Stenotrachelys approximaria, Guen. (On oak, Abbot.) Endropia bilinearia, Packard. (On oak, Packard.) Endropia pectinaria, Guen. (On oak and poplar, Abbot.) Metanoma querciveraria, Guen. (On oak, Packard.) Nematocampa filamentaria, Guen. On oak, Thorn, &. Therina endropiaria, Pa>kard. Also about fifty species of Micro-Lepidoptera. 5 (EN.) Given as feeding on oak by Packard. 66 UID $n COLEOPTERA. Romaleum atomarium, Drury. (In dry twigs of Quercus virens in Florida, Schwarz.) Elaphidion murcronatum, Fabr. (Same as preceding species.) Tragidion fulvipenne, Say. (Bores in oak, Riley.) Acanthoderes 4-gibbus, Say. (In dead twigs of oak, Schwarz.) Bostrichus bicornis, Web. (Under bark of white oak posts, McBride.) Synchroa punctata, Newman. (In rotten oak stumps, Horn.) Centronopus calcarata, Fabr. (In black oak stumps, Horn.) Centronopus anthracinus, Knoch. (Same as preceding species.) Coscinoptera dominicana, Fabr. (In oak, Riley.) Mordella 8-punctata, Fabr. {In old oak stumps, Riley.) HEMIPTERA. Eriosoma querci, Fitch. Lecanium quercifex, Fitch. Lecanium quercitronis, Fitch. The oak is also attacked by many species of hymenopterous gall-flies, which distort and disfigure the twigs, buds and leaves, forming swellings and protuberances of various shapes and sizes. The flies which produce these galls are very small, and are generally of a black color, with red or yellow legs. CREATURES THAT AFFEOT THE FARMER THROUGH HIS LIVE STOCK. Rey. THomas W. Fyies, SoutH QuEBEC. Part I.—Insecr PEstTs. Part II.—Entozoic PEsts. ile ** Round Mount Alburnus, green with shady oaks, And in the groves of Silarus, there flies An insect pest (named (strus by the Greeks, By us Asilus): fierce with jarring hum It drives, pursuing the affrighted herd From glade to glade ; the air, the woods, the banks Of the dried river, echo their loud bellowing.” —-VigGIL, GEoreics ITT. HoRrsE-FLIES (TABANID2). Kirby and Spence, in Letter V. of their very interesting [Introduction to Entomology, speaking of the Tabanidz say :—‘“ In North America vast clouds of different species—so abundant as to obscure every distant object, and so severe in their bite as to merit the appellation of burning flies—cover and torment the horses to such a degree as to excite compassion even in the hearts of the pack-horsemen. Some of them are nearly as big as humble-bees ; and when they pierce the skin and veins of the unhappy beast make so large an orifice that, besides what they suck, the blood flows down its neck, sides and shoulders till, to use Bartram’s expression, “ they are all in a gore of blood.” Packard i in his valuable Guide to the Study of Insects, page 394, confirms this statement, saying of Tabanus lineola, ‘This fly is our most common species, thousands of them appearing during the hotter parts of the summer, when the sun is shining on our marshes and western prairies; horses and cattle are sometimes worried to death by their harrassing bites.” Upwards of eighty species of the genus Z'abanus are found in North America, and the names of thirty-two of these are on the Toronto Natural History Society’s list. The 67 allied genus Chrysops has also many species. The largest of our horse-flies is Tabanus. atratus, the Black Horse-fly. (Fig. 45.) A specimen of this now before me is one inch in length of body and two inches in expanse of wings. It is one coloured, brownish-black , Tabanus lineola, the Lined Tabanus, is of a greyish-brown, and has a whitish line alone the abdomen. It measures about an inch in expanse of wings. Its proboscis is a formidable arrangement of the maxille and other mouth organs. The female horse-flies are those that are to be dreaded ; the males do not bite. Wood in his Insects at Home, page 615, speaking of Tabanus bovinis, gives usa good hint as to the way of dealing with the horse-flies generally. After telling of his sufferings from the bites of these creatures—of returning to his lodgings with the whole space behind his ears filled with clotted blood from the wounds inflicted upon him, he says :— “ At length I discovered a plan which enabled me to enjoy comparative immunity from these and other insect pests. Before starting for the forest I dipped a little sponge in paraffin and rubbed it over my hands, face and neck. I also put some of the liquid into my gloves, and took a little bottle with me so that I might renew it as soon as the odour began to decrease in strength. Thus armed I went into the forest, and hearing in the distance the well-known trumpet charge of the Breeze Fly, determined to await the insect without flinching. The creature drove fiercely at my face until it was within a foot or eighteen inches from me, when it came within the vapour of the paraffin and darted off like an arrow. Two or three times it tried the assault, and as often had to check itself, until at last it flew off in disgust and did not return.” Stomoxys CALCITRANS, This is a small fly belonging to the family Muscip&. It is about the size of the. _heuse-fly, but is very different from it in many respects. Its face is yellow.and its eyes, are brown. Its thorax is yellow, striped above and below with black, and its abdomen yellow, dotted with brown. Its wings have the front edge and the tip brown, and a conspicuous brown patch in the middle. The creature has a sharp proboscis and bites fiercely. It particularly affects the horse’s ears. Probably paraffin rubbed on the ears would save the horse many a pang. Hipposposca EQuina. The Horse-tick is happily far less abundant than S. calcitrans, but its attacks are. more to be dreaded. It delights to get under the tail, or between the hind legs of the horse ; and it renders the animal furious by the irritation caused by its beak and claws, No doubt the thick hairy coat, the mane and the tail of the horse were designed as protectives against the attacks of injurious insects; and those who have noticed how 68 Ne eee “horses stand in the pasture, nose and tail together for mutual! protection, will understand the cruelty of “clipping” and ‘‘ docking.” THe SHEEP-TICK (Melophagus ovinus). The Sheep-tick is closely related to H. equina. Though it is ranked with the DipterA or Z'wo-winged Flies, the Sheep-tick has no wings. Unlike other Diptera, “moreover, its abdomen has no segments—it is a membraneous sack. The insect is in many respects a very remarkable one. It produces an offspring almost as large as itself, and that not in the egg, but in the pupa. This pupa is soft and white at first, but its -case soon turns brown and hardens. At the front of the pupa is a notch marking the lid. This lid in due time opens to let the perfect insect escape. Thorough washing, close shearing, and the application of a decoction of tobacco, are the approved measures against this intruder. THE Bor Fuies (OEsTRID2#). The Bot-fly of the Horse (Gastrophilus equt). The Bot-fly of the Ox (Hypoderma bovis). The Bot-fly of the Sheep (Oestrws ovis). Who does not know the Bot-fly of the horse? Who has not admired the persever- ance with which the creature accompanies the horse for miles, hovering around its chest and fore-legs, and the skill with which it darts in at a favourable moment, protrudes its ovipositor and glues an egg toa hair of the animal? The eggs deposited by the bot-fly are ready to hatch in four or five days. The horse licks itself, and its wet tongue comes in contact with the eggs. They burst, and the -active maggots adhere to the tongue, and are afterwards taken with the saliva into the stomach of the animal. Here they fasten themselves by means of the hooks with which their heads are furnished. They are nourished by the juices of the stomach. When full grown they are voided and drop to the ground, in which they bury themselves. They ‘shen pass into the pupal state, and in about six or seven weeks the new bot-flies appear. To prevent mischief from G. equi, let the horse wear a net; groom the animal ‘thoroughly, and make frequent use of the sponge and hot water. Pratt gives the following REMEDY FOR Bots. “Take oil of turpentine 8 oz. ; alcohol, 1 quart. Mix and bottle for use. Dose, 4 to 5 oz. in the horse’s feed, once a day for eight days, will effectually remove every vestige of hots.” —The Horse's Friend, page 296. The Ox Bot-fly bores a hole, with her horny and augur-like ovipositor, through the skin of the back of the ox, and drops an egg therein. The process takes but a few moments, but the ox does not like it. The hole thus made enlarges as the maggot grows, allowing the air to reach the respiratory organs of the parasite. A tumor forms, and from this the creature is at length ejected, to pass the after stages of its existence as in the case of G. equi. Young and healthy animals are selected by H. bovis as hosts for its young. The perfect insect is black and hairy, and has yellow, white and orange mark- ings. It appears towards the end of summer. The Sheep Bot-fly deposits its young (for it is ovo-viviparous) in the nostrils of the sheep. The maggots crawl into the head, and feed on the mucus produced in the maxillary and frontal sinuses. When they are full grown, the sheep blows them from the nose, and they fall to the earth, there to pass into the pupa condition. The fly is of a dirty ash colour, with a brownish thorax. Its hairy abdomen is mottled with yellow: and white. Pine tar rubbed on the noses of the sheep is a preventive to the operations of the insect. 69 II. “One talks of mildew and of frost, And one of storms of hail, And one of pigs that he has lost By maggots at the tail.”— Cowper. Entozoic pests are more dangerous and more difficult to treat than those we have hitherto been considering. Their operations are obscure, and have in many instances. been fatal both to man and beast. It is hoped that the following brief accounts of some- of the most note-worthy of these pests will be acceptable. Tare Worms. The common Tape-worm (Tenia soliwm) consists of a head (which is in reality the- body), and a great number of joints (zovids), each of which contains sexual organs of* both kinds, and is capable of independent life. The tail segments detach themselves as. they arrive at maturity, one by one, and are voided by their “host”; whilst, from the body of the worm, fresh zooids are indefinitely produced. The eggs from the voided joints become scattered on the ground, and disseminated in various ways. The pig frequently swallows them with its food. They sometimes tind their way (probably in unfiltered water or on raw vegetables) to the stomachs of human beings. From the eggs. thus swallowed embryos, or proscolices escape, and are carried by the circulating fluids to remote parts of the body of the new host. They have been known to penetrate to the brain of man, and to cause epilepsy, and finally death. Obtaining a lodgment, the embryos begin to absorb nourishment and to swell, developing at length into what are known as cysticerci. These are bladder-like forms with the heads turned inwards. It is the presence of these in the flesh of the pig that causes the disease known as the “ measles.” Measly pork splutters in the pan, the cysticerci bursting with the heat. When raw or imperfectly cooked measly pork is eaten by man or other animal, the. measles (cysticerci) pass into the stomach, and are acted upon by the digestive fluids. The bladder-like case or vesicle succumbs, but the head uninjured passes into the intes- tines, and fastening itself by means of its sucking appendages, proceeds to develop into. the mature tape-worm. Dr. Kuchenmeister, a physician of Zittau, in Saxony, was per- mitted to administer measly pork to two criminals condemned to death. After their. execution ten tape-worms were found in the intestines of one, and nineteen in those of: the other. Thus it will be seen that two hosts are necessary for the completion of the cycle of* existence of the tape-worm—the earlier stages are passed in one, the later in another. In the case of 7enia solium, the earlier stages are passed in the body of the hog, rat, etc., and the later in man or some inferior animal. Tenia mediocanellata passes from. the calf or ox, to man or the dog; Tenia marginata, from the dog to the hog, ete. ; Tenia crassicollis, from the mouse to the cat, etc. ; and V’etrarhynchus reptans, from the. sun-fish to the shark, etc. But of all the tape-worms the most dreadful perhaps is Tenia echinococcus. It is. said that one-sixth of the deaths among the population of Iceland result from the. attacks of this creature, and that there were in the year 1863 ten thousand cases of echinococcus disease in the island. The worm attains to perfection in the dogs with, which the island abounds, and its embryos find their ways into the systems of the human inhabitants, and produce the terrible results recorded. In England fatal cases resulting. from the same dreadful cause are not unfrequent. Of hogs slaughtered at the Montreal abattoir ‘seventy-six in one thousand and: thirty-seven were found to be measly—that is, infected by the cysticercus cellulose, the. cause of tape-worm—and thirty-one were found to contain the echinocoecus.”—Dr. W.. Osler and Mr. A, W. Clements, reported in Montreal Daily Star, January 13th, 1883. Hogs should be confined to a vegetable diet and milk. They should not be allowed to roam at large, and to feed on the garbage of slaughter-houses, etc. The ordinary: 70 butcher’s hog should be held in abomination. Scalding water should occasionally be thrown over the floors of the pig-pen and the dog-kennel. Should a tape-worm be voided by any creature, it should be burned immediately or buried deep in the earth. Dried beef, ham, &c., should not be eaten raw. A//J meat should be thoroughly cooked. Especial care in this respect should be taken with sausages. TRICHINA SPIRALIS This parasite was first made known by Prof. Owen, the famous English anatomist in 1835. It was discovered in its encysted condition in human flesh. Prof. Owen found that the gritty calcareous capsules, that had blunted the dissector’s scalpel, contained, in every instance, from one to three minute hair-like worms coiled up conically. This circumstance suggested the name of the parasite to him. A German helminthologist, Dr Herbst, by feeding dogs with trichinous meat, and afterwards dissecting them, dis- ‘covered the way in which the trichine are propagated. ‘The capsules containing trichine, having passed into the stomach, are dissolved by the gastric juices, and the worms are set free. The adult male worm is one-twelfth of an inch long, the adult female is one-eighth of an inch. The latter is ovo-viviparous—she brings forth her young alive. These rapidly spread themselves throughout the voluntary muscles, wherein they at length become encysted, In the case of the human host they must ultimately perish—unless, indeed, the unfortunate man be destined to become a ‘missionary, and to make a meal for inhabitants of New Caledonia, or some other nice people. It is from the pig that danger of trichinous infection is to be dreaded; and the danger is greater perhaps than people are aware of. It has been found that about one in two hundred and fifty of the pigs killed in Montreal have suffered from trichinosis. ’ Such paragraphs as the following, very frequently appear in the newspapers :— “‘ Henrietta Straez, of Chicago, ate raw ham at a wedding a month ago, and died on Friday of trichinosis in great agony. Forty thousand parasites were found in a square inch of one of her muscles. A number of other persons who partook of the ham showed evidence of the disease but most of them have been relieved.” —Montreal Daily Witness, January 21, 1882. “Four hundred persons are prostrated by trichinosis in ten villages of Saxony, and fifty-one are hopelessly ill. Deaths from the disease are occurring daily.”— Vontreal Daily Star, October 17, 1883. The symptoms of trichinosis or trichiniasis are as follows :—Loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, diarrhcea, fever and prostration, soreness in the muscles, painful swellings, laboured breathing, etc. The disease in pigs has often been mistaken for ‘“ hog-cholera ” ; in human beings, for typhoid fever. The means of prevention are the same as against the echinococcus disease. Tue Liver FLUKE (Fasciola hepatica). The Flukes, unlike the triehine and the tape-worms, are not parasitic through all the period of their existence. They spend a portion of the time on land, a portion in the water. The full-grown liver-fluke is about an inch in length, and is pointed some- what abruptly at the head, but tapers gradually at the other extremity. It is provided with two suckers—the oral for imbibing nourishment, at the extremity of the head ; the ventral at the base of the neck, which is nsed merely as a “holdfast.” The skin of the ‘creature is furnished with numerous microscopic spines. The liver-fluke is found most frequently in grazing cattle, and especially in the sheep. The disease it causes is known as the “rot”; and so destructive is it, that, in England, during the season of 1830-31, it was estimated that upwards of 1,000,000 sheep died from it alone. The flukes are ‘sometimes very numerous ; Leuwoenheck counted eight hundred and seventy in one liver. 71 The life-history of the fluke is a very extraordinary one. It is hermaphroditic ‘When sexually mature it passes from the liver of the sheep, and escapes through the intestinal canal to the open pasture land, where it deposits its thousands of eggs. By various agencies, and especially in wet weather, these eggs are carried into pools, ditzhes running streams, etc. From the moistened egg a ciliated embryo, or proscolex, escapes. This swims about for a while till it comes upon the soft body of some water-snail or insect and to this it fastens itself, After a time it casts away its ciliated covering and pene- trates the body of the creature to which it attached itself. When favourably placed, it rapidly develops into what is called the “nurse ” or Sporocyst, and produces young called Cercariw. These cercarie migrate, swim about in the water, or wander into the moist pastures. From thence they are taken, either in food or drink, into the digestive organs of sheep, cattle, and (sometimes) human beings. From the digestive organs of their “host ” they bore their way to the liver, in which they become encysted, and remain for a length of time. At length, having attained a higher organization, they burst from their enclosures, and become converted into the perfect Fasciola hepatica. The preventives against the fluke that have been suggested are, the confining of the sheep to the high pasture-lands that they naturally prefer, frequent salting, keeping the stock in good condition by the use of cut turnips, oil-cake, etc. Well fed, healthy stock seem as a rule to be less open to the attacks of parasites of every kind, than weak and sickly ones. SCLEROSTOMA SYNGAMUS. This parasite is the cause of the ‘‘gapes” in poultry. It is a small red worm of the thickness of a common pin. The females are half or three-quarters of an inch long: the males are smaller. They infest the wind-pipe of the fowl and cause suffocation. Poultry troubled with them gape, sneeze, and gasp for breath. To relieve them, strip a feather to near theend, dip this in salt-and-water, then slip it dexterously into the wind-pipe of the fowl, twist it around once or twice and suddenly withdrawit. This will dislodge and bring away the worms. It is said that a loop of gut such as is used in fishing-lines may be used effectively for the same purpose. The poultry-house should be frequently and thoroughly cleaned. Wood and coal-ashes should be spread over the floor and occasionally a little carbolic acid should be sprinkled upon it. A little flour of brimstone and ground ginger mixed now and then with warm meal, and fed to the fowls, would be beneficial. BEE-MOTHS. REY, THOMAS W. FYLES, SOUTH QUEBEC. The Honey-Bee (Apis mellifica), is not an indigene of America. It was imported by the early colonists; and it soon spread and multiplied exceedingly—the forests surrounding the early settlements affording both sufficient harbourage and abundant food for the ever multiplying swarms.. By the Indians the bee was called the White Man’s Fly. ‘* Wheresoe’er they move, before them Swarms the stinging fly the Ahmo, * Swarms the bee, the honey-maker.” (Song of Hiawatha, ch. xxi.) “Tt is surprising in what countless swarms the bees have overspread the far West within but a moderate number of years. The Indians consider them the harbingers of the white man, as the buffalo is of the red man, and say that in proportion as the bee advances, the Indian and the buffalo retire.” (Washington Irving: Tour on the Prairies, ch, ix.) 72 __ _OOOOOO—O—O—O“OSsooaql‘_euqeaee=$=~=~$™$mqTS0 ——oa—*“WwoaooOoajw«w«wswoaS>woowoooowow((0 oaaaaac—0— —saac—sSs>w>«“wMNDna—a>—swvwmnmlr And Bryant well sang :— “The bee, A more adventurous colonist than man, With whom he came across the eastern deep, Fills the savannas with his murmurings, And hides his sweets, as in the golden age, Within the hollow oak.” adding with prophetic voice :— “T listen long To his domestic hum, and think I hear ~ The sound Of that advancing multitude Which soon shall fill the deserts.” ( The Prairie. ) Fennimore Cooper, in his stories of The Prairie and Oak Openings has given delinea- tions of the men, who, on the outskirts of civilization, made it their business to hunt and plunder the bees. But a spoiler apparently less formidable, but in reality more dangerous, followed up the bee more closely than did its human foes. This was the Bee Moth (Galleria cereana. Fabr) a fellow exile. (Fig. 46 represents all its stages: a the full grown caterpillar, 6 the cocoon it spins, ¢ the chrysalis, d the female moth with open wings, e the male with closed wings.) And now, wherever bees are kept upon this continent, there is danger to them from the ‘‘ Bee Moth.” A few words therefore upon the Bee Moth and its relatives may be interesting to those who have the care of bees. The bee moths belong to that group of insects called Pyralidina, and to the family Galleride in that group. Insects of the kind were known to the earliest writers on the subject of bees. Aristotle and Virgil allude to them. The former says that the moths and worms are expelled by the good bees; but that the combs of the idle bees perish. The latter numbers “the moths’ dreadful progeny ” among the enemies of the hive. In England three different bee moths are known belonging to as many different genera, but all in the family Galleride. They are Galleria cerella, Aphomia colonella, and Achoria grisella. The first and last named are found in the hives of the honey- bee, and the second in humble-bees’ nests. We will take the insects inversely so as to end with the one we are most interested in. ACHROIA GRISELLA. Many years ago I had abundant opportunities for observing Achrova grisella through all its changes. My accounts of the insect were published at the time in the Zoologist and the Entomological Intelligencer. The larva of A. grisella is about nine lines in length when full fed, and is rather hairy. It is very active, throwing itself vigorously about at the slightest annoyance. Its colour is white with a tinge of pink. The head and second segment are reddish brown. The spiracles are hardly perceptible. The pupa is pale brown, and is enclosed in a white cocoon, It is usually secreted near the entrance under the inside ligaments of the old-fashioned straw hives. The imago is from six to eleven 73 —————————————————————— lines in expanse of wings. Its head is yellow. The body and wings are grey withla | satiny gloss. The fore-wings are rounded at the tip. There are two broods of the insect in the year. The English naturalist who would see A. grisella to advantage should take his stand in the apiary at the close of the day. There he may see the female moths hovering with a bee-like motion near the entrances of the hives. Their object is to dart between the guards, and win their way to the interiors. Notwithstanding their amazing agility they do not always succeed in this. I have more than once seen grisella seized by the bees and torn in pieces with the utmost fury. When the door of the hive is passed, however, the chief danger is over, and the moth proceeds to lay its eggs in suitable places within the hive. The larve as soon as they burst from the egg begin to spin silken tubes or covered ways, sheltering themselves under their work, and pushing it forward through the hive to the brood-comb on which they thrive most. APHOMIA COLONELLA, This enemy of the humble-bee is found both in Europe and America (See Packard’s Guide to the Study of Insects, p. 329). The moth is an inch or more in expanse of wings. The fore-wing is of a pinkish grey, having a tinge of green along the front edge, it is marked with two serrated transverse lines, and between these with two black dots. The hind margin is entire. In the male insect the basal half of the fore-wing is whitish. The female moth, in the month of June, deposits her eggs, in great numbers, amongst the cells of the humble-bees nest ; and the larve that emerge from them soon bring die comfiture to the rightful owners. GALLERIA CEREANA, The moth that is dreaded by the bee-masters of this country is Galleria cereana. In Langstroth’s book on bees this insect is misnamed TZinea mellonella. It is true that Virgil uses the term tinea in speaking of the bee-moth ; but, since the days of Fabricius, it has been applied to a genus to which the bee-moth does not belong. In England the moth is called Galferia cerella ; and Wood in “ Insects at Home ” tells us the reason why, He says :—“ The specific name cerella (from the Latin word cera, wax) has been given to this insect in consequence of the wax-eating propensities of the larva. Linnaeus being deceived by the structure of the palpi* gave to the male the specific name of cereana, and to the female that of mellonella (from the Latin me/, honey). So in order to avoid confusion, both these have been rejected, and the present specific name accepted in their stead ” (page 500). By American naturalists, however, the name cereana is retained. Galleria cereana in its perfect state is a brownish moth, measuring, when its wings are expanded, about an inch across. In repose the wings hang down like the sides of a table. The fore-wings are longer than the under-wings, and appear as if they had been roughly squared off. The female has a beak-like formation of the head, and a remark- able ovipositor, which works with a telescopic motion, enabling it to deposit eggs in crevices out of harm’s way. The insect is wonderfully tenacious of life. Langstroth tells us that Mr. Tidd, of Boston, cut a female in two, and the abdomen went on thrusting out its ovipositor, and depositing eggs in some slits which had been made with a pen-knife in the board on which it lay. There are two broods of G. cereana in the year. The former of these appears in May, and the latter in August. The larve are larger and plumper than those of Achroia grisella. In appearance they are waxen grubs, having their heads and second segments horny. Like those of A. grisella, they construct silken tunnels ; and, like them also, are slightly hairy. I imagine that the hairs serve as feelers. At any rate the larve are extremely sensitive, darting back into their silken galleries at the slightest touch. *The terminal joint in the palpus of the male is short and conoid: in the palpus of the female it 4s ong, tapering, and slightly forked at the end. Te We ie 74 A few years ago I laid away, in an unused chamber, a hive, full of comb, that had been vacated by the bees. Examining this hive some time afterwards, I found the comb completely broken down and destroyed. On the bottom of the hive there was an un- sightly mass of tangled webs, and fragments of wax, dotted throughout with the black castings of the cereana larve. The larve themselves were gone; but, on examining a hea). .f pamphlets and newspapers that Jay near, I found the leaves stuck together with nuieerous silken and beautiful white cocoons. From these, in due time, I obtained aan) perfect specimens of Galleria cereana. The bee-moths delight in ill-constructed hives, in which there are accumulations of old vom, Their presence in any number is a sure sign of weakness 1n the bees. A hive in wiici they have well established themselves may be known by its offensive smell. {'o banish them the modern hives with moveable frames should be used. Affected comb should be cut away and destroyed. It should be remembered that masses of web and broken comb, thrown on the refuse heap, will afford both food and protection to any larve that may remain in them, and that, in due time, perfect insects will come forth to invade the hives again. NOTES ON THE HEPIALIDA OF THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC. BY THE REV. THOMAS W. FYLES, SOUTH QUEBEC. The Hepialide, in England, are denominated ‘“ Swifts,” from their peculiarly rapid and oscillating flight. One of their number (Hepialus humult) is called ‘‘ the Ghost,’”— the snow-white wings and hovering motions of the insect having suggested the name. o42Qur Canadian representatives of the family are few in number, and extremely rare. Three of the four species that have been taken in the Province of Quebec have greater amplitude of ‘wing than most of their British congeners. Characteristics of the genus Hepialus. Imago :—Antenne, filiform and very short. Wings, distant at the base, lanceolate or som what faleate. Abdomen, elongate. Lurva:—Naked, elongate. Head and second segment, horny. Feeds at the roots, or in the stems, of plants. Pup2:—Furnished with short spines on the segments. Descriptions of Hepiaius Moths taken in the Province of Quebec. Argenteo-maculatus. (Harris.) This fine insect, which is about three inches in expanse of wings, is in colour ash-grey with cloudy markings. The hind wings have an ochreous tinge towards the tips. The silvery spots to which it owes its name are two on each fore-wing. The one nearer the front edge is round; the other is triangular. The insect is described by Harris, in ‘‘ Insects injurious to Vegetation,” page 410. Dr. D. S. Kellicott, of Buffalo, succeeded in raising this species, from larve obtained from roots and stems of Alnus incana (Can. Ent. vol. xx., p. 233), Gosse, in the ‘‘Canadian Naturaiist, (page 248) speaks of Argenteo-maculatus (which he names “the Dragon Moth,”) as “quite numerous” in the latter part of July in the fields around his residence at Waterville, P.Q. The circumstances in this case must have been very peculiar, for, I think, no one else has found the insect numerous in any part of Canada. Gosse found it- ‘dancing from side to side on the wing above the herbage within a space of a yard or two.” A female which he pinned ejected small white eggs to a considerable distance with great rapidity. In 1871 I found what I believed to be a pupa of this species in a stem of common alder; but the insect, probably from lack of moisture, perished. ; 75 | Auratus. (Grote). This beautiful moth is very accurately described by Grote in Can. Ent., vol. x., p. 18., from a specimen taken in the Adirondacks by Mr. W. W. Hill in 1877. It has since been taken by Mr. E P. VanDuzee, at Buffalo, New York (Oan. Ent., vol. xx., p. 100). I have a lovely specimen of the insect which I took in Brome Oounty, in July, 1865. It is of a faint purplish tinge. The fore-wings are decorated with pale brown markings and extensive patches like as of dead gold. There are also a pale golden spot, at about one-half the length and one-fourth the width of the fore- wing, and, near the hind margin, three other pale golden spots triangular in form. I took the insect with a net in the dusk of the evening, as it was flitting near the hedge-row of a meadow, on a slope of the ‘ Pine Mountain.” Thule (Strecker) was described and figured by Strecker in “ Lepidoptera,” No. 12, from a specimen sent to him by Mr. Caulfield, of Montreal. In February, 1884, Mr. G. J. Bowles wrote that Strecker’s specimen, a specimen in his own possession, and a third in the possesion of Mr. J. G. Jack, of Chateaugay Basin, were, he believed, ‘‘ the only Specimens in collections ” (Can. Ent. vol. xvi., p. 40). Since then the insect has been taken by Mr. W. D. Shaw, and by Mr. H. H. Lyman. The specimen I have was pre- sented to me by the last named gentleman. It was capthred in July. Mr. Shaw found the species hovering over and settling upon the Ox-eye Daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare), in August, at Cote St. Antoine. Thule is about two and one-half inches in expanse of wings. It is creamy white in colour. Starting from the base of the fore-wing, and touching the costa for about two- thirds of its length, there is an irregular brownish patch. The costal edge is dark brown, and projecting from this into the brownish patch are three conspicuous dark-brown rec- tangular spots. On the inner edge of the patch, not far from the base, are two small white spots in dark-brown rings, and on the further extremity of the same edge is a third white spot in a dark brown ring. There are a few other less conspicuous brown spots on the fore-wing, and, towards the hind margin, two slightly scalloped and interrupted brown lines. The fringe on the hind margin is marked with brown spots. Gracilis, (Grote). This insect, described and figured by Grote, is the smallest of the Quebec Hepialide. In expanse of wings it measures one and one-fourth inches. The wings are but slightly feathered. They are of a warm brownish hue streaked and spotted with darker brown. From the inner side of the base of the fore-wing, sweeping round to the tip, is an irregular, pale band. The fringes of the hind wings are brown and white. The only specimen I have of this rare moth was taken at Cowansville, in July, 1881, resting on the under side of a Hoof Boletus (Boletus igniarius. ) THE RISE OF PRACTICAL ENTOMOLOGY IN AMERICA. BY AUG, RADCLIFFE GROTE, A.M., VICE-PRES. AM. ASS. ADV. SCIENCE (1878), ETC. There is another kind of moth found in Massachusetts—and with this echo of Dr. Harris’s style of writing repeating itself in my mind, I passed under the elm trees, crossing Boston Common. It needed not to feed my imagination that the trees themselves were placarded with Latin titles; 1 felt that I was upon scientific and sacred ground. For Boston, Science has not come in vain. Rather does she seem to dwell habitually within Bostonian shrines, leaving the temples to her honour in New York empty of the divine affatus. That long past July day, its heat tempered by a cool east wind, my first in Boston, sheds its light upon me still, while so many of its fellows have passed in darkness from my recollection. I have never since been down by the Back Bay, or wandered Cambridge ways, sub tegumine ulmi, without feeling a particular reverence for the place, strange to a wanderer who has passed through many cities of renown. While New York is cosmopolitan in all its aspects, and its Jews and Gentiles combine to produce a tutti frutti dish of American science, Boston has a scientific style of its own, descending, with everything else, from the Puritans themselves. No matter who unfolds there his teaching, he tends to lose some part of his individuality, his thoughts take a local cast, he shapes his 76 words into sentences of Bostonian ring and emphasis. A mighty spirit pervades the people. Professor Louis Agassiz, a great man, was himself influenced thereby, and lately even Dr. Hagen, still resisting the English language and talking of ‘‘ educating ” a cater- pillar, after a quarter of a century in the shadow of Harvard, vaguely feels the spirit of Massachusetts. Recently, and since her last great champion for the old order of nature has passed into the eternal silences, Boston has been occupied in moulding Darwinism preparatory to swallowing it. Already it appears as if home-made, and is ready to deceive the very elect. ‘The earlier notion of the origin of mankind wastoo much in accordance with the simple vigour of Puritan thonghts to be easily abandoned. Whereas the New Yorker quickly changed his mind as to his line of descent, being in any event unequal to the task of tracing it for any length, Boston had to fit the new ideas to the New England eternities of the “ Mayflower” and Bunker Hill before they could find favour in her eyes. But we live now in an age of anniversaries, of semi-centennials and centennials, and among these we entomologists may find the opportunity of commemorating a New England notion, and he who represented it, Dr. Thaddeus William Harris. It is a sign of increasing thoughtfulness, that, along with the memory of distinguished persons, we celebrate the rising of the ideas by which they were animated. Hero worship has not declined, but there is a clearer idea prevailing as to the value of the heroes and the principles they represented, and, in consequence, some changes in public opinion as to the quality of the heroship itself. And it would appear, that whereas public opinion has declined in its estimation of many temporary celebrities and their causes, it is rising as regards Dr. Harris and the cause he represented. Amid the recent wholesale creation of the office of State Entomologist, fifty years after the publication of the first Report on Injurious Insects, we may indulge in a semi-centennial retrospect, and briefly refer to some of the phases of the progress of the science of entomology in America during this period. Yes, it is Dr. Harris who ran the first furrow, and his successors have but widened the field of practical and economic entomology. Out of the eternal movement of atoms and ideas, the New England notion, sent forth through Dr. Harris (1837-1841), has grown in importance, and the States are generally following the example of Massa- chusetts. In the Botanical and Zoological Survey of this State, authorized by a resolve of April 12th, Dr. Harris was appointed June 10th, 1837, to report upon the insects. The first short report upon the ‘“‘ Habits of some of the Insects injurious to Vegetation in Masachusetts ” (1838), was followed by the well known and fuller “ Report on the Insects of Massachusetts injurious to Vegetation ” (1841). It is a relatively small world in which my hero moved, and yet it finds room for differing samples from the great world about it. Its members are held together by their devotion to the study, but are otherwise ill assorted and move reluctantly together. We are all men befcre we are entomologists. Entomology has its scholars and pedants, its men of good and ill temper, its men of conscience and no conscience, of large and small views, kind and unkind. It is clear as daylight of what sort was Dr. Harris. A plain and earnest man, without either assumption or rawness, worthy of study in all his ways, of most commendable disposition. From his picture we get the impression of a sort of good homeliness, which stands as well in a man as good looks. From his writings we gather the certainty that he wasa pleasant, honest gentleman. As it is the soul which builds the body, itis certain that Dr. Harris was all of this. Alas, that there are not more like him. Not only should all the newer State Entomologists take him for an example, but the appointing power, in the exercise of a high discretion, should take Dr. Harris as a. standard ; should know their man before appointing him, nor be deceived by mere dabblers in the Latin names of insects. Men of talent, of the larger views which come of reading and experience, should be sought, for such do not readily present themselves. Unfortunately the appointing power yields without thought to the importunities of those entirely impressed by their own abilities, self conscious, pushing, selfish persons, who some- times come in this way to fill a position which a better and more modest man would have adorned. Even in entomologists, those dealers in cosmical smallware, the inequalities of life and character are mirrored. 77 Thomas Say was, perhaps, the earliest American entomologist of wide reputation. At any rate, he described insects in all the orders, and was, for a time, an authority in all of them. After Say’s death there came a pause in the progress of technical ento- mology. Say’s wide knowledge of genera and species in all the orders was inherited by no one singly. But Dr. Harris is not to be reckoned among the successors of Say. Dr. Harris gave a fresh turn, a useful impetus, to the science. Entomology becomes under his hands practical, a positive help to agriculture. The real successors to Say, with whom commences what I have called the period of renascence in American entomology, sub-divide Say’s field and the domain falls into many hands. From a wider view the entomological wave passes from south to north. Commencing at the close of the last century in Georgia with Abbot and the elder Leconte, it reaches Pennsylvania at the beginning of this century with Say, and carries Harris in Massachusetts on its crest before breaking and flooding the continent in all directions. The real successors to Say are Dr. Leconte and, afterwards, Dr. Horn on the Coleoptera; Cresson, Bassett, Norton and Provancher on the Hymenoptera; Osten Sacken and Williston on the Diptera ; Scudder and Thomas on the Orthoptera ; Uhler on the Hemiptera, with others, bringing the knowledge of genera and species into a completer shape. The Lepidoptera falls into many hands, anch io son pittore/ There is this about the mere naming and classifying of insects, that, no matter how exactly the work is performed, it carries with it a certain stamp of dilettantism. Only when the scientific knowledge so gained is carried into other domains and made the basis of generalizations upon the laws of life, or when it is carried into public economy and used to further the practical ends of agriculture, does entomology become a serious science. Say’s work, with all its merits, has this flavor of dilettantism about it, and he contents himself with giving a brief description of the Cotton Worm Moth (Aletia argillacea) and Hessian Fly. But Harris, with a much slenderer acquaintance on the whole with the genera and species of insects, lifts his work out of this atmosphere of dilettantism by the turn which he gives to it, and which is hencefor- ward to make one chief development of entomology in America. Practical entomology is to technical entomology what our everyday language is to Latin. There can be no question which is the more useful.. In giving Dr. Harris the credit for this turn of the science, one might enquire into the genesis of the idea itself, but it is sufficient for us to celebrate the semi-centennial of its great incorporator. The successors to Dr. Harris and the natural inheritors of his idea are Saunders and Fletcher in the Dominion; Fitch, Walsh, Riley, LeBaron, Lintner, Comstock, in the States. The example set by the Legislature of Massachusetts was not quickly followed, and, as in most public matters in America, private enterprise tided over the “ New England notion” until it received general official recognition. This private help came principally from Philadelphia where Oresson, Blake and others issued the “ Practical Entomologist,” in the sixties, and of which periodical I was editor for the first few numbers, to be suc- ceeded by the late Mr. Walsh. These unpaid and unofficial exertions did much to pre- pare public sentiment, to bring about the present wholesale recognition on the part of the State of the value of entomological researches. From these unofficial sources, as well as others not here mentioned, together with the issue of the Canadian Entomolo- gist, which began in 1867, came assistance during the years until the Western States should answer the call of Massachusetts, and Illinois in 1868 and Missouri in 1869, ap- point their State Entomologists. Later on Prof. Saunders, in 1883, issued his “ Insects injurious to Fruits,” of which recently the second edition has appeared, a book which has claims to be placed side by side with the famous treatise of Dr. Harris. But the State of New York had, in 1854, taken a step in the same direction. In the Cultivator for June of that year appeared the following paragraph: ‘The Legisla- ture of this State (i.c. New York) at its late session, placed $1,000 in the hands of the New York State Agricultural Society to be expended in making an examination and description of the insects of this State injurious to vegetation. Ata meeting of the Board, Dr. Asa Fitch of Salem, Washington Co., was appointed to carry this object into effect. A better selection could not have been made, and we learn that he is to devote his attent on this season mainly to the investigation of such insects as depredate upon truit-bearing trees. His report will be looked for with interest and we doubt not will 76 words into sentences of Bostonian ring and emphasis. A mighty spirit pervades the people. Professor Louis Agassiz, a great man, was himself influenced thereby, and lately even Dr. Hagen, still resisting the English language and talking of “ educating ” a cater- pillar, after a quarter of a century in the shadow of Harvard, vaguely feels the spirit of Massachusetts. Recently, and since her last great champion for the old order of nature has passed into the eternal silences, Boston has been occupied in moulding Darwinism preparatory to swallowing it. Already it appears as if home-made, and is ready to deceive the very elect. The earlier notion of the origin of mankind wastoo much in accordance with the simple vigour of Puritan thonghts to be easily abandoned. Whereas the New Yorker quickly changed his mind as to his line of descent, being in any event unequal to the task of tracing it for any length, Boston had to fit the new ideas to the New England eternities of the ‘“‘ Mayflower” and Bunker Hill before they could find favour in her eyes. But we live now in an age of anniversaries, of semi-centennials and centennials, and among these we entomologists may find the opportunity of commemorating a New England notion, and he who represented it, Dr. Thaddeus William Harris. It is a sign of increasing thoughtfulness, that, along with the memory of distinguished persons, we celebrate the rising of the ideas by which they were animated. Hero worship has not declined, but there is a clearer idea prevailing as to the value of the heroes and the principles they represented, and, in consequence, some changes in public opinion as to the quality of the heroship itself. And it would appear, that whereas public opinion has declined in its estimation of many temporary celebrities and their causes, it is rising as regards Dr. Harris and the cause he represented. Amid the recent wholesale creation of the office of State Entomologist, fifty years after the publication of the first Report on Injurious Insects, we may indulge in a semi-centennial retrospect, and briefly refer to some of the phises of the progress of the science of entomology in America during this period. Yes, it is Dr. Harris who ran the first furrow, and his successors have but widened the field of practical and economic entomology. Out of the eternal movement of atoms and ideas, the New England notion, sent forth through Dr. Harris (1837-1841), has grown in importance, and the States are generally following the example of Massa- chusetts. In the Botanical and Zoological Survey of this State, authorized by a resolve of April 12th, Dr. Harris was appointed June 10th, 1837, to report upon the insects. The first short report upon the ‘‘ Habits of some of the Insects injurious to Vegetation in Masachusetts ” (1838), was followed by the well known and fuller “ Report on the Insects of Massachusetts injurious to Vegetation ” (1841). It is a relatively small world in which my hero moved, and yet it finds room for differing samples from the great world about it. Its members are held together by their devotion to the study,- but are otherwise ill assorted and move reluctantly together. We are all men befcre we are entomologists. Entomology has its scholars and pedants, its men of good and ill temper, its men of conscience and no conscience, of large and small views, kind and unkind. It is clear as daylight of what sort was Dr. Harris. A plain and earnest man, without either assumption or rawness, worthy of study in all his ways, of most commendable disposition. From his picture we get the impression of a sort of good homeliness, which stands as well in a man as good looks. From his writings we gather the certainty that he wasa pleasant, honest gentleman. As it is the soul which builds the body, itis certain that Dr. Harris was all of this. Alas, that there are not more like him. Not only should all the newer State Entomologists take him for an example, but the appointing power, in the exercise of a high discretion, should take Dr. Harris as a. standard; should know their man before appointing him, nor be deceived by mere dabblers in the Latin names of insects. Men of talent, of the larger views which come of reading and experience, should be sought, for such do not readily present themselves. Unfortunately the appointing power yields without thought to the importunities of those entirely impressed by their own abilities, self conscious, pushing, selfish persons, who some- times come in this way to fill a position which a better and more modest man would have adorned. Even in entomologists, those dealers in cosmical smallware, the inequalities of life and character are mirrored. 77 Thomas Say was, perhaps, the earliest American entomologist of wide reputation. At any rate, he described insects in all the orders, and was, for a time, an authority in all of them. After Say’s death there came a pause in the progress of technical ento- mology. Say’s wide knowledge of genera and species in all the orders was inherited by no one singly. But Dr. Harris is not to be reckoned among the successors of Say. Dr. Harris gave a fresh turn, a useful impetus, to the science. Entomology becomes under his hands practical, a positive help to agriculture. The real successors to Say, with whom commences what I have called the period of renascence in American entomology, sub-divide Say’s field and the domain falls into many hands. From a wider view the entomological wave passes from south to north. Commencing at the close of the last century in Georgia with Abbot and the elder Leconte, it reaches Pennsylvania at the beginning of this century with Say, and carries Harris in Massachusetts on its crest before breaking and flooding the continent in all directions. The real successors to Say are Dr. Leconte and, afterwards, Dr. Horn on the Coleoptera; Cresson, Bassett, Norton and Provancher on the Hymenoptera; Osten Sacken and Williston on the Diptera ; Scudder and Thomas on the Orthoptera ; Uhler on the Hemiptera, with others, bringing the knowledge of genera and species into a completer shape. The Lepidoptera falls into many hands, anch io son pittore! There is this about the mere naming and classifying of insects, that, no matter how exactly the work is performed, it carries with it a certain stamp of dilettantism. Only when the scientific knowledge so gained is carried into other domains and made the basis of generalizations upon the laws of life, or when it is carried into public economy and used to further the practical ends of agriculture, does entomology become a serious science. Say’s work, with all its merits, has this flavor of dilettantism about it, and he contents himself with giving a brief description of the Cotton Worm Moth (Aletia argillacea) and Hessian Fly. But Harris, with a much slenderer acquaintance on the whole with the genera and species of insects, lifts his work out of this atmosphere of dilettantism by the turn which he gives to it, and which is hencefor- ward to make one chief development of entomology in America. Practical entomology is to technical entomology what our everyday language is to Latin. There can be no question which is the more useful.. In giving Dr. Harris the credit for this turn of the science, one might enquire into the genesis of the idea itself, but it is sufficient for us to celebrate the semi-centennial of its great incorporator. The successors to Dr. Harris and the natural inheritors of his idea are Saunders and Fletcher in the Dominion; Fitch, Walsh, Riley, LeBaron, Lintner, Comstock, in the States. The example set by the Legislature of Massachusetts was not quickly followed, and, as in most public mattersin America, private enterprise tided over the “ New England notion” until it received general official recognition. This private help came principally from Philadelphia where Cresson, Blake and others issued the “ Practical Entomologist,” in the sixties, and of which periodical I was editor for the first few numbers, to be suc- ceeded by the late Mr. Walsh. These unpaid and unofficial exertions did much to pre- pare public sentiment, to bring about the present wholesale recognition on the part of the State of the value of entomological researches. From these unofficial sources, as well as others not here mentioned, together with the issue of the Canadian Entomolo- gist, which began in 1867, came assistance during the years until the Western States should answer the call of Massachusetts, and Illinois in 1868 and Missouri in 1869, ap- point their State Entomologists. Later on Prof. Saunders, in 1883, issued his “ Insects injurious to Fruits,” of which recently the second edition has appeared, a book which has claims to be placed side by side with the famous treatise of Dr. Harris. But the State of New York had, in 1854, taken a step in the same direction. In the Cultivator for June of that year appeared the following paragraph: ‘The Legisla- ture of this State (i.e. New York) at its late session, placed $1,000 in the hands of the New York State Agricultural Society to be expended in making an examination and description of the insects of this State injurious to vegetation. Ata meeting of the Board, Dr. Asa Fitch of Salem, Washington Co., was appointed to carry this object into effect. A better selection could not have been made, and we learn that he is to devote his attent on this season mainly to the investigation of such insects as depredate upon fruit-bearing trees. His report will be looked for with interest and we doubt not will 80 fe ee of May and the beginning of June.” There is no uncertain ring about this. It is the opinion of the writer that ‘“‘ Carthage must be destroyed.” And, after invoking the aid of “every able-bodied citizen” and every “housewife,” he ventures to say “that the enemy will be conquered in less time than it will take to exterminate the Indians in Florida.” From his language we can see that Dr. Harris stood nearer to the Revolution. The Seminoles we may infer were regarded then as a sort of pest, and the extermination of Indians was always a part of the regular Puritan programme. At any rate, Dr. larris, here at the outset, recognizes the value of co-operation. Unless the farmers take hold generally and apply the wisdom contained in the State Reports, they will have been _ssued in vain. As a technical writer on the butterflies and moths Dr. Harris shows a rare excellence. His account of the butterflies of New England is remarkably full and accurate, considering what had been previously published on the subject. I have always read with keen interest the pages upon which he has given us the histories of the Spinner moths. The natural impatience with which inexperienced entomologists, in their rage for exact nomenclature, are apt to feel at his occasional mistakes, leads them to neglect this portion of the report, which, nevertheless, it would do them good to read and ponder over. These lovely Spinner moths, escaping by the hands of time from the cage of winter, make a hidden glory in the world. On purply wings they cleave the night, in their brushing flight becoming early worn and old through the quick impatience of their lives. We pin them in our boxes and write very learned paragraphs about them, forcing these soft creatures, with their curved and rounded outlines, into our square and rigid categories. But they escape us still, and, after all our efforts, we dissect mere dead chitine at last. Yet it affords a livelihood for some of us butterfly farmers, and, for others, the chance of being sometime remembered by name, of becoming in a way oneself & species lifted out of the individual ranks—the most trifling immortality, to be named in connection with a moth! As I have discovered some facts in the history of the White Mountain butterfly, it may carry some faint memory of me upon its wings. We may remember Dr. Harris by a host of insects which fill our fields each summer. Yet there is something more to be attained than to be thus remembered by posterity. We may feed our souls by study and observation by the way side, gathering with our experience a host of happy memories. Thoreau says: “TI can recall to mind the stilless summer hours, in which the grasshopper sings over the mulleins, and there isa valour in that time the bare memory of which is armour that can laugh at any blow of fortune.” We must bring something away with us beside our specimens. A healthier mind, a nobler resolve, the virtue that comes from watching the struggle for life, impressing us constantly like the wind that blows upon us and is never quiet. The Hindoos say that, for purity, there is nothing to be compared with wisdom. [I do not doubt it. But through action and application we reap the reward of our wisdom and test its value. But what a small field in the stretching prairies of wisdom we entomologists cultivate, whose fences yet contain for us a universe! When the true succession of evolution has been made out, we must atill make shift to live and die, still face the same conditions of life and await the same end. ‘The problem of life changes its aspect, but remains unsolvable. My copy of Dr. Harris’s writings is one originally presented by the author to Dr, Fitch. It contains a few marginalia by both, and I give here those of Dr. Fitch upon Harris’s account of the Spinner moths. These present some few points of interest, for, while our knowledge is fuller, it is far from perfect, and a certain interest pertains to the remarks of one who followed so closely in the footsteps of Harris. On page 241 of the report, after Harris’s account of Gnophria vittata, Dr. Fitch writes: ‘“‘ Vide Lithosia depressa, Fabr., Sup. p. 460.” I have not consulted this reference. I have given, I believe correctly, the synonyms and the name for the variety of this species in my check list. Previously the names were not properly referred. Aiter Arctia Americana, Dr. Fitch says: “A specimen was sent to me from Canajoharie, but | have never met with it in Washington county ;” and then adds ‘“’till July 27th, 1864.” To Arctia acrea, Dr. Fitch notes: ‘‘ I took a specimen at Fort Miller, 1832—where it could hardly have been introduced in the way Harris supposes.” This is in reference to the remarks on 81 * page 249 of the report, as to the species being carried in the chrysalis form with the salt hay from the coast. On the larva of Hyphantria textor, Dr. Fitch adds: “It here infests the bitter walnut most, and the swamp oak nearly as much.” Of the females of Orgyia leucostigma, Dr. Fitch says, “They have a dusky dorsal vitta.” Dr. Fitch makes no remark upon Harris’s Dasychira leucophea, which is probably incorrectly identified. It appears also that the moth determined in the Harris collection as achatina is not that species but Clintoni. Nor are there any marginalia to Lagoa opercularis, which, from the description, is not Abbot’s species but perhaps Z. erispata. In fact Harris, not unfrequently but mistakenly, identifies allied Southern forms, figured in the insects of Georgia with New England species, as first pointed out by Dr. Packard. Dr. Harris thinks also that Z. opercularis (i.e. crispata ?) may be the Bombyx Americana of Fabricus. Dr. Fitch further notes to Clisiocampa Americana (larva), that, ‘‘ Their lives consist of repetitions of three acts, eating, sleeping and enlarging or adding to their nests ; in fine weather they often repose outside of the nest, lying side by side, closely stowed.” To Gastropacha Americana, Dr. Fitch adds: ‘“‘I found this on the white oak in the middle of July in Stillwater, Md.” To the account of Dryocampa imperialis, Dr. Fitch adds, ‘‘ On the pines around Philadelphia abundant (T. B. Ashton) locally called the ‘Pine Moth.’” With a criticism of Harris’s expression “ especially behind the tip” in the description of Perophora Melsheimeri, p. 301, the marginalia come to an end. I have fancied, myself, that the Spinner moths belong to the east and north, in the same way that the Hawk moths belong to the south, the Owlet moths to the West of North America. In fact several species seem to be alpine or sub-alpine, and when we regard the protective cocoon and the frequent woolliness of the moths, one would con- sider the family fitted for resisting the cold. But it is in reality very generally distri- buted, and this is a proof of its long existence as a group. The Ghost moths, or Hepi- aline are represented over the glebe with but little structural variation, retaining in Australasia the general peculiar form which they display in Europe, California, Massa- chusetts and Brazil. I believe, therefore, that this particular sub-family of the Spinner moths is ancient and has survived many physical changes of the earth’s surface. The typical Spinner moths, such as the Aftacine, seem wanting in the West India Islands, from whence also I have seen no Ceratocampine. This is a noteworthy observation in geographical distribution. I have also noted that the Ceratocampine, or Hawk Em- peror moths, are found over the level country, east of the Rocky Mountains and Andes, not crossing the mountains to the Pacific as it would seem. By a strict comparison of the faune of the West India Islands and the continent of North America, some addi- tional light may be thrown on the physical history of these portions of America. Dr. Harris is an author whom we can conscientiously recommend to students of either technical or economic Entomology, for in the report the two departments of ento- mological science are not separated; it was hardly time for that; but they must be finally separated, and I have always deprecated the mixing up of technical entomology, in the reports of State entomologists, with economic entomology, their proper subject. Descriptions of new species, opinions as to matters of special classification and nomencla- ture, all these, with which the technical entomologist deals, are out of place in State © reports. What the State intends to pay for is a history of injurious insects and a dis- cussion of the best means to prevent them. There is then a certain abuse of their posi- tion involved in the introduction by official entomologists of extraneous matter in their reports. For technical work we have the proceedings of the various societies, the pages of the well-known Canadian Entomologist. It was, indeed, the opinion of Agassiz, that names to secure adoption should be published in works offered for sale. There exists, then, some doubt whether technical entomologists should pay attention to reports’ which are simply distributed and thus not generally accessible. The question here comes up as to the publication of authoritative names in technical entomology. The sole criterion seems to be the recognisability of the object intended. Names for genera are sufticiently legitimized by the statement of the type. The type, an already described species, is something of which science has already cognizance, something known. When we reflect how unequal the generic formulas are, how opinions differ, how rarely, at least formerly, the intimate structural features are given, the justice of this simple rule becomes appar- 6 (EN.) 82 ent. Undoubtedly the worker who gives accurate and detailed accounts of his genera is entitled to more praise. As to species, and I have worked much with specific diagnoses in different languages during the past thirty years, there is no standard except recognis- ability for their validity. And this is imparted by a figure very well, generally indeed much better than by a description. Hence a figure, without description, should secure acceptance for the specific name attached. Although the arts of painting and writing have separated, a fundamental idea unites them and the author and the painter may still be compared. For primitive man expressed his idea by picturing the object before letters were invented. Some writers are like scene-painters, laying the colour on thickly and drawing their outlines boldly. They allow for the distance from which their work will be viewed. The distance of the spectator from the object to be viewed is replaced in letters by the ignorance of the reader of the subject discussed. He is impressed by the treatment because he does not know the subject in its detail, being carried away by” the distinctness of the main idea, adopting the writer’s view easily because forcibly and singly impressed upon his mind. Other writers indulge in detail work all finely laid on; they are like painters in miniature whose work is executed and may be studied under a glass, of whose general subject, as a whole, one may lose something in following the parts. This comparison is often in my mind between painters and authors so that the shelves of my library seem like a gallery of paintings, mental pictures hang about the titles on the back of the books, pictures affecting me more or less pleasantly. In my thoughts I make the good qualities of many entomological writers my own and thoroughly enjoy them. The splendid industry of Mr. W. H. Edwards, the scholarship of Mr. Seudder, Dr. Packard’s talent, the thoroughness of Prof. Fernald, the clearness and gentleness of Prof. Saunders—all come home to me. And Dr. Harris impresses me by his largeness and earnestness. A homely landscape with shade and sun, flower and bee. This largeness and fine simplicity may be influenced to some extent by his surroundings, by the great. and venerated University near his work. But the natural man is evidently superior to his surroundings, rises above them at times, although the nearness to such a centre of education gives both elevation and harmony to the soul disposed to receive the impres- sion, All these entomologists are men of the first class, with faults of the second, not men of the second class with faults of the first. About all our work there is a sense of ~ incompleteness, but to ensure our enjoyment the incompleteness must come as an after taste, not at once offend our palate. In most departments of thought there is some one author who, by his calmness and reasonableness, gives us confidence and prevents us from being carried off our balance by the assertions and claims of the rest. Dr. Harris seems to perform this useful office in the literature of entomology; so that, from his writings, one obtains a needed refreshment. He is so genuine, so full of his subject and yet so modest and unobtrusive. The plant of entomology is growing ever, spreading into our lives and affording occupation for many busy workers. But it may be long ere we meet one like Dr. Harris. The personality of man has a feeble beginning, is so little differ- entiated, but at length it out-tops the universe. A chip of the world which seems greater than the whole. So, in the world of entomology, Dr. Harris will always seem to have been a great man. All writers appear to stand at different angles to the truth, which, as Turgeniew says, we cannot grasp as with hands. . The positien which Dr. Harris occupies as to the truth which is in the science of entomology, is most direct. In the meantime we are year by year adding to the picture of the science, filling out the pattern after Nature, describing species after species) When shall we get to the end of our catalogues !—there is another kind of moth found in Massachusetts. 83 SOME THOUGHTS ON THE DETERMINATION OF SPECIES. BY J. ALSTON MOFFAT. Much dissatisfaction is expressed with the determining of species in entomology on the structure of the imago alone, and great advantages are anticipated when the earlier stages of insects are all worked out. A laudable desire is expressed in the writings of the various workers in systematic entomology to bring their methods as much into harmony with Nature as possible ; this is hopeful. A naturalist should allow no personal preference for one system over another to influence him in his work ; his attitude should be to discover as much as possible of Nature’s mode of operation, work on parallel lines, and construct his system accordingly. Now, as there is considerable divergence in the direction to which these labours are tending, it seems to indicate that there is a decided difference of opinion about what Nature’s method is, or a misunderstanding of its interpretation. No one can have been engaged in the investigation of any department of biology without being impressed with the fact that Nature is not constructed on any principles of mathematical exactness ; therefore, any system aiming at that must be, just in proportion as that is attained, arti- ficial. Now, a form is often met with in life that seems to fit in nowhere comfortably, whilst another has so many points in common with widely separated forms that it is difficult to decide just where to place it; hence, I suppose, the temptation to multiply divisions, and give them places to themselves. One great objection to our present method of dividing into genus and species is, that it often has the effect of separating forms in a way that Nature has not. When a form is termed a “ species ” it stands apart from its fellows to some extent ; if it is placed ina different genus it stands yet further apart. When we look at a check list, with its divisions and subdivisions made with exactness, and names with apparently no natural affinity, one would expect to be able to separate the various parts with ease ; then look at a representative collection ; what a contrast! To the uninitiated the surprise is, where the necessity was for separating the great bulk of them at all. We may in a joke tell him that in the name is easily seen the difference, but we have to acknowledge that in the insect it is microscopic. But divisions have to be made, and that they may be made just where Nature indicates, it is desirable that those engaged in the work should know the life history of the insect, its habits and mode of life, as well as its appearance in its various stages. A knowledge of structure only—size, form and color—is sufficient for the purpose of describing and naming an insect, the object of which is future identification. If that knowledge includes the earlier stages, so much the better for the purpose, but a good deal more is required of him who would endeavour to give it its natural position in a system, and it is unfortunate that much of this latter work has been done by those only partially qualified for it ; the “ mere collector ” often having more knowledge of Nature than the accomplished scientist. Do the divisions of genera and species meet the requirements of nature? Dividing lines, to be of value, should be stable ; they look rigid ; life in Nature is never rigid, and its dividing lines are of the most undulating and irregular eharacter. Scientific terms are exact, and it was found that genera and species did not meet the requirements of science, so varieties were added to supplement them, and now the principal trouble centres around species and varieties, no definition of the term “species” being satisfactory to all, and the kinds of varieties being many, and the origin of some of them unknown. Our knowledge of the laws of propagation in the animal economy is principally derived from the experiments with animals in domestication, and the results attained show the marvellous extent to which variation can be carried when continued for a length of time, and we may safely conclude that what man cannot do in this direction Nature never does, The terms used in this work are species for all forms that, when brought together 84 produce fertile progeny ; varieties for all the various forms from such a union ; hybrids for such as are invariably infertile from a given union, such uniform infertility being taken asa proof that the parents belonged to different species. This arrangement is brief, natural, easy to comprehend, and exact, and is as applicable to animal life in Nature as in domestication. The way man obtains his varieties is by careful, intelligent selection and isolation ; no such control being known to exist in Nature for such a purpose, the appearance of varieties there must be referred to some other cause. Many species vary greatly, a few seem not to vary at all. There are many kinds of variations—Ist, sexual, where the sexes differ in size, form and color ; 2nd, seasonal, different broods of one species appearing at different times of the year, differing in some respect ; 3rd, local, where different forms of the same species are found in different localities ; 4th, well-marked varieties of some species, found in the same locality, coming from the same parents, belonging to the same brood ; 5th, species that give broods in which no two specimens are exactly alike. - Into the causes of all this I do not enquire ; it is in the constitutions of the organisms; how it got there we may never know ; it is a fact of their existence, that is enough for the present. One thing we may be certain of, it is not of recent origin, it may have been accumulating for times indefinite. About the first there is no trouble when once the fact is known. The second has been satisfactorily dealt with in the last check list of North American butterflies. The fourth wants to be dealt with in the same manner ; the mode of speaking of ‘a species and its varieties” is not in harmony with Nature. This is the last entry, in the diary, and I know nothing more of his life except what is told in some letters to Thaddeus W. Harris. Some extracts follow :— “1865. January 1. I possess: “$570.00 in Confederate money. «$200.00 in = bonds. ** $900 in certificates. “$200.00 in provision store shares. “$13.00 in bank notes. “$114.90 in silver. “Feb. 10. The Yankees are in Barnwell Co. To-day’s prices: a load of oak wood, $140; a barrel of flour, $55.00; a pound of brown sugar, $12.00 ; a bushel of corn, $35.00, “Feb. 17. The Yankees are here, 75,000 strong. This is the last day of Columbia, They at once entered the houses, got drunk, and set fire to everything. I beyzan to move everything that could be moved into the garden ; but they broke open the trunks and boxes with their swords, and followed this up with a regular and general plunder. “Feb. 22. The army has left. All quiet. My collection and books brought back in the house. Expenses for these days :—1 bushel meal, $40.00; 13 tbs. beef, $22.00; mo- lasses, $6.00. ' “July 1. We still possess — $1,100.00 Confederate States bonds, worth .........., $ 0 00 $915.00 Confederate treasury notes “ ......... 0 00 $13.00 South Carolina bank bills “ ............ 2 00 $3.00 South Carolina state bills “ ........ 2 00 SSUN VM ENOMIEN deters coc os sae 2 tore iattw cag alten eee 74 00 PE es gah ean oie PCG eee Ca be oes RUA oss toa ee 2 Bs Copper 0 05 ‘We must begin again at the beginning.” This is the closing sentence. These few simple words, without any moan over the _ loss of his all, are not a little touching—all the more so because the pathos is uninten- tional—the pathos of facts, not of words. ‘They call to mind his former record of the loss of everything by shipwreck on the 10th September, 1839, followed by the entry on Sept. 16th, “ Beginning of a new collection.” Zimmerman died in December, 1867. He left no children. His interest in science was always kept up. Nearly every month the number of insects collected is reported, sometimes amounting to 3,725, and during the year to 11,500, In November, 1842, he sent fifty dollars to T. W. Harris to buy three Goliaths, He constantly bought books both in Europe and America, and his library was valuable. It was bought by the Museum of Harvard Oollege in Cambridge, excepting some volumes which were retained for his own use by Dr. J. L. Leconte, at whose instance the pur- chase was made. His collection is also in the museum, having been bought first by Dr. Lewis, of Phil- adelphia, and from him by the late R. Crotch, who sold it to the museum. A great part is in Le Conte’s collection, and can be recognised at once by the numbers on the pins, in Zimmerman’s handwriting. He was an unwearying worker. In 1842 he wrote to Harris that he was occupied with a systematic arrangement of the Lamellicorns, and wanted Kchiurus and Goliath for study. In April, 1844, he writes again to Harris :—“ TI have almost finished my chapter on Lamellicorns. ¥ - 104 BOOK NOTICE. Insects Ingurious To Fruits; by William Saunders. Second edition. Philadelphia J. B. Lippincott Company, 1 vol., 8vo, pp. 436. Tt is with very great pleasure that we announce the publication of the second edition of this valuable and important work. That a new issue should be called for is a most satisfactory proof of the excellence and permanent usefulness of the book, and establishes. the fact that Prof. Saunders has provided the fruit growers of North America with a. standard manual upon the insect enemies that they have to contend with. Six years have gone by since the issue of the first edition, and during that time great. and steadily increasing attention has been given to the study of economic entomology, with the result that many new methods have been discovered for successfully combatting the ravages of noxious insects. The most important and useful of these the author has. now embodied in his book, and has done so with very little change in the text of the work. A superficial reader would hardly notice the alterations, but we find that many have been made, and that they bring down the information given to the knowledge of the present day. As an example, we may mention the insertion among the’ remedies for the codling worm, of the apple and the plum curculio, the recently discovered method og spraying with a mixture of Paris green and water, which has proved so eminently successful , For the information of those of our readers who are not already familiar with the work, we may mention that the insects treated of are grouped under the name of the particular fruit that they attack, and are arranged in order according as they affect the root, trunk, branches, leaves and fruit. An illustrated life history is given of each, fol- lowed by an account of the most useful remedies that may be employed and of any para- sitic insects that assist in keeping the pest in check. Twenty of the most important fruits are dealt with, and two hundred and sixty-six noxious insects and a large number of beneficial ones are more or less fully described. The book is beautifully printed on fine paper, and illustrated with four hundred and forty admirable wood cuts. . While this work is simply indispensable to the intelligent horticulturist, it is als® of great value to the practical entomologist and a most useful book to place in the hands of beginners. The young collector will find in its pages figures and descriptions of most of the insects he meets with, and the more advanced student cannot fail to learn from it. much that would otherwise escape his observation. elie oan ee PAM 4 pe FACULTY OF FORESTRY LIBRARY, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO ’ pee as ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCEIT Y OF ONTARIO. PROCEEDINGS | 18™ - 21°" ANNUAL REPORT fg, 1887 1880 | | QL 416 E68 GERSTS Note: issues are bound out cr order sequence: 19, 18, 2OLAG. 21-20 ~~ or —— ee en ee —e cel oe " . : ; = v ‘ See Te ATS POAT ALR aa ” 6 és n na “ . os POORER <4