PROCEEDINGS OF THE ^o^d BaddQ of i^ktoria. VOL. II (New Series), Edited under the Authority of the Council. ISSUED JUNE 1890. THE AUTHORS OF THE SEVERAL PAPERS ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SOUNDNESS Of THE OPINIONS GIVEN' AND FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE STATEMENTS MADE THEREIN. MELBOUENE : ,STILL^YELL AND CO., PRINTERS, 195a COLLINS STREET. AG£.\T6 TO THE SOCIETY: WILLIAMS & NORGATE, 14 HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN, LONUDN, To whom all communicatiou.s for trausmission to the Royal Society of Victo:ia, from all i)arts of Europe, should be sent. 1890. CONTENTS OF VOLUME IT (New Series). Short Addresses Eead at the Annual Meeting — paoi: (1) On Progress in Astronomy during 1888-1889. By B. L. J. Ellert, Esq., F.E.S., F.R.A.S. .. .. .. i (2) On the Chemistry of To-Day. By Professor Orme Masson, M.A., D.Sc. .. .. .. .. .. xiii (3) On Recent Progress in Biology. By A. H. S.Lucas, M.A.,B.Sc. xvii (4) On Recent Developments in Public Hygiene. By James Jamieson, Esq., M.D. .. .. .. .. xxi (5) On Geological Progress. By G. S. Griffiths, Esq., E.G. S. xxix (6) On Literature and the Fine Arts. By James Edward Neild, Esq., M.D. .. .. .. .. xxxii Art. I. — On the Discovery of Fossil Fish in the Old Red Sandstone Rocks of the Mansfield District (with Plates I, II, and III). By George Sweet, Esq. . . . . . . . . 1 11. — A Systematic Census of Indigenous Fish, hitherto recorded from Victorian Waters. By A. H. S. Lucas, Esq., M.A., B.Sc. .. .. .. .. .. ..15 III, — On the Occurrence of lu'aussina lamarckiana (Davidson) at Williamstown, with a Census of the Victorian Brachio- poda. By A. H. S. Lucas, Esq., M.A., B.Sc. . . . . 48 IV Observations on the Australian Species of Peripatus. By Arthur Dendy, M.Sc, F.L.S. .. .. ..50 V. — On Some Additions to the Fish Fauna of Victoria. By A. H. S.Lucas, Esq., M.A., B.Sc. .. ,. ..63 VI. — On a New Species of Bicellaria. By J. Bracebridge Wilson, Esq.,M.A. .. .." .. .. ..64 VII. — On Some New Species of Marine Mollusca. By J. Brace- bridge Wilson, Esq. , MA. .. .. .. ..64 VIII. — Remarks on Some New Tables for Finding Heights by the Barometer. By E. J. White, Esq., F.R.A.S. .. .. 68 IX. — Notes on the Barometric Measurements of Heights (with diagram). By Professor Kernot, M.A., C.E. .. .. 78 X.— A New System of Photo-Lithography. By G. W. Perry, Esq. 81 XL— Liquid Kino. By J. H. Maiden, Esq., F.L.S., F.G.S. .. 82 XII.— The Calculimetre. By James Fenton, Esq., F.S.S. .. 84 XIII. — On Finding the Longitude from Lunar Distances. |Ky E. J. White, Esq., F.R.A.S. .. .. .. .,87 XIV. — On the Pseudogastrula Stage in the Development of Cal- careous Sponges (with Plate 1a). By Arthur Dendy, Esq., M.ScF.L.S. .. .. .. ..93 XV. — The Pineal Eye in Mordacia mordax (with woodcut). By Professor W. Baldwin Spencer, M.A. . . . . 102 XVI. — Description of New or Little Known Polyzoa. Part XIU. (with Plates IV and V). By P. H. MacGillivray, Esq., M.A., M.R.C.S., F.L.S. .. .. .. ..106 Contents. PACK XVII.— On the Illumination of Public Clocks. By Sidney W. Gibbons, Esq., F.C.S. .. .. .. ..110 XVIII.— Notes from the Biological Laboratoiy of the Melbourne University (with Plate VI). (1) On the Occurrence of a Partially Double Chick Embryo. By A. H. S.Lucas, Esq., M.A.,B.Sc. Ill (2) On the Formation of a Double Embryo in the Hen's Egg. By Professor W. Baldwin Spen- CEE, M.A. .. .. .. ..113 XIX. — Address at the Inauguration of the Literatm-e and Art Section of the Eoyal Society. By Arthur S. Wa/, Esq., M.A. .. .. .. .. .. .. iTe"^ XX.— Report of the Port Philhp Biological Survey Committee, 1889 134 (1) Preliminary Report on the Crinoids obtained in the Port Phillip Biological Survey. By P. H. Carpenter, Esq., D. Sc, F.R.S. .. .. 13.5 (2) Preliminary Report on a Collection of Alcyonaria and Zoantharia from Port Phillip. By S. J. HiCKsoN, Esq., M.A., D.Sc. .. ..136 Meetings of the Royal Society, 1889 .. .. .. .. l-ll Laws .. .. .. .. •• •• •• 171 List of Members . . . . . . . . • . ■ • 182 List of Institutions and Societies Receiving Copies op the "Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria" .. 191 ^vanal .^0cicln of irutoriir. 18 85). HIS KXOKLLEN'CY THE RIGHT HON. JOHN ADRIAN LOUIS HOPK, G.r.MM SEVENTH EARL OF HOPETOUN. PROFESSOR W. C. KERNOT, M.A., C.E. K. .1. WHITE, F.R.A.S. I J. COSMO NEWBERV, R.Sc.:CM.(i. |joiT. OTnasurtr. JAMES JAMIESON, M.D. Hon. §£cntams. II. K. RUSDEN AND PROFESSOR W. BALDWIN SPEXCER, MA. JAMES E. NEILU, M.D. C. R. I5LACKETT, F.C.S. i PROF. ORME MASSON, MA, D.Sc. J. BOSISTO, C.M.G. II. MOORS. R. L. J. ELLERY, C.M.G., F.R.S.. ' J. T. RUDALL, F.H.C.S. F.R.A.S. i W. H. STEEL, C.E. A. W. HOWITT, F.G.S. | ALEX. SUTHERLAND, M.A. A. H. S. LUCAS, M.A., B.Sc. i C. A. TOPP, M.A., LL.B. i> "'lisrary f^ COEKIGENDA. Page 116-For Art. XVIII, read Art. XIX. ANNUAL MEETING, Thursday, March 14, 1890. SHORT ADDRESS ON THE PROGRESS IN ASTRONOMY DURING 1 888-1889. By R. L. J. Ellery, F.R.S, F.R.A.S. In pursuance of an arrangement made by your Council, that at our annual meeting an endeavour should be made to lay before the members a popular and brief outline of the progress in various branches of science during the past year, I have undertaken to give a short account of the principal items in the year's advance in astronomical knowledge. Although there is nothing very thrilling or remarkable to record, there are many points of considerable importance and interest, some of which we recognise as steps towards a better knowledge of the constitution of the universe and of individual parts of the solar system, as well as of the tenants of space in regions beyond. The large number of comets that come under our observation every year now, as compared with former years, must not be regarded as evidence of the existence of a greater number than formerly, but of the fact that the heavens are now so closely scrutinised, that but few which come to perihelion, escape detection. During the year 1 888, no less than six were discovered, viz. : — (a) Sawerthal's Comet, discovered at Cape, February 18. (6) Eucke's „ re-discovered, August 3. (c) Brooks' (cl) Fayes' (e) Barnard's (/) Barnard's August 7. ,, August 9. Lick Observatory, September 3. re-discovered October 31 . X Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. Tlie relation of comets to meteor streams is now pretty firmly established, but exactly what that relation is, still remains to be determined. Meteor streams in distant parts of their orbits have been seen as comets, but whether all comets themselves are an aggregation of meteors, or meteor streams disintegrated comets, is yet a matter for speculation. Mr. Lockyer has lately propounded a new hypothesis of the heavenly bodies, which may probably lead to new directions of enquiry, and further knowledge in this respect. His idea is that space is a plenum of meteoric particles, mostly moving in groups or swarms in regular orbits. These orbits sometimes intersect, giving rise to collision of particles, and to the formation of new and lesser orbits, and so forming a rotating agglomeration of meteoric matter, with evolution of heat and lio-ht, becomino- visible as a nebula or nebulous star, and perhaps eventually as a concrete star itself Nebulae, comets, and nebulous stars are considered all of the same kind of matter under different conditions of motion of constituent particles, and consequently under different temperatures, as shown by spectroscopic characteristics. If Mr. Lockyer's great hypothesis be correct, we must conclude that all the heavenly bodies are made of the same stufij under different conditions of sparseness of distribution, motion of constituent particles, and temperature. A comet, a nebula, or the planet Saturn for instance, would be of similar matter under differing conditions. There has been a good deal written about the discovery of strange appearances in Mars, and we have read sensational articles of canals, martial inundations, &c., with all the flights of imagination of clever newspaper writers, who dress up the bare cold facts of the astronomer in a tempting garb for the popular reader. The facts are briefly as follows : — Several veteran observers with large telescopes, liave recently spent much time in a continuous scrutiny of the planet Mars, during the periods of his nearest approach to the earth, and more especially at the approach in the early months of ] 888. The appearances of a network of dark Progress in Astronomy. xi Hues and of changes in these lines have presented the most interesting features to the observers. These lines or " canals " as they ai-e called, appear to overspread the brighter parts or continents of the planets. The markings are stated to have been seen to change under observation, the so-called canals to " germinate " or split oft', leading some to the suggestion that they are actually artificial works in progi'ess ! Enormous inundations of portions of the planet's surface are also stated to have been seen. The great Lick telescope was devoted to observations of tliese appearances in July and August, and photos of rough drawings are on the table. There can be no doubt about the appearances, but there is about the interpretation of them. Astronomers generally, I think, are " waiting" for further developments, for there are insuperable difficulties in accepting the explanations already ventured upon. It is moi'e than probable that all these appearances will eventually be attributed to diffi'action or optical effects from conformation of vaporous surroundings of the planet, rather than of any objective change in its surface. The great Lick telescope, the largest refi-acting telescope yet constructed, with an aperture of thirty-six inches, and a focal length of fifty-six feet, was first pointed to the heavens on January 3, 1888, but could not be really used till July 16th following, owing to the freezing of the hydraulic gearing. So far, I think it has proved itself, not only the biggest, but the best telescope in the world, if one can judge of its work that has been put before us, especially the drawings of some of the planets. This giant refractor, it appears, is not long to enjoy the reputation of being the largest refractor in the world, for it is now proposed to build an observatory at Los Angelos in Southern California, on Wilson's peak, 6000 feet high, which is to have a telescope of forty-two inches aperture. If this comes to pass, California will be able to boast of having the two largest refracting telescopes in the world. Speaking of telescopes, I may inform our members that the Melbouiiie Reflector is xii Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. still under repair, the work of repolisliing the mirrors, after twenty years' work, was commenced in May last, but the preparations and practice landed us in the hot summer weather before the operation was completed, and the work had to be deferred till cooler weather prevailed, for polishing cannot be attempted so long as we are subject to temperatures of 80 to 90 and over. The work will be recommenced in about a week, and if all goes well, I hope to have the telescope at work again by Ma}-. Preparations have been pushed on for commencing the international work of obtaining photographic charts of the heavens, if possible, during the current year, but I fear that the most than can be accomplished under the most favour- able circumstances, will be "to get ready" to commence early in 1890. The photographic telescope for Melbourne is well advanced, and the building for its reception will be erected shortly. In the meantime, many improvements are being made in the methods to be adopted, and beautiful photographs have been got of faint nebul?e and other objects which have hitherto been considered " out of range " of the sensitive film. The lunar tables hitherto used have been found insufficient, and the most recent ones, viz., those of "Hansen's," after a long period, it is found the tabular and observed places of the moon differ very considerably, showing that some disturbing causes have not been sufficiently allowed for in their construction. Some yeai's ago. Sir George Airy (late Astronomer Royal), then over 70 years of age, undertook the development of a new lunar theory, a work of great magnitude and mathematical intricacy. In November last, he communicated to the Royal Astronomical Society, the fact that he had discovered an error which had crept into the earlier part of his work, that would necessitate attacking it from the beginning, but that with advancing years (now 88) and failing strength, he could scarcely hope to bring it to a satisfactory conclusion. It is to be hoped, however, that some others will take up this important work, so Chemistry of To-day. xiii intrepidly begun by our old Astronomer Royal in the evening of his life. During the year, two men who had made their mark in the astronomical arena, have passed away, Richard A. Proctor, the well-known author of many astronomical works (though not a practical astronomer), and Editor of the periodical Knoivledge, died of yellow fever in New York, on 12th September. J. C. Houzean, Honorary Director of the Royal Observatory, Brussels, author of Uranometric Generale Vade Meciiin de VAstronomie and BibliograpJdc Generale de VAstronomie, died July 12, 1888, at the age of 68. SHORT ADDRESS ON THE CHEMISTRY OF TO-DAY. By Professor Orme Masson. I fancy it will be best not to attempt to do what is impossible — to give you an account, in the ten minutes at my disposal, of the results of the chemical researches of the past year. I shall rather try to indicate some of the great problems in the science which still await solution, but towards the solution of which something has been contri- buted by recent important investigations. The phrase " modern chemistry " has been used in many senses. It carries us back to 1661, or thereabouts, when we hear Boyle described as the "Father of Modern Chemistry ;" to the end of last century, when Lavoisier is credited with having founded modern chemistrj^ by his enunciation of the correct theory of combustion ; and there are not wanting chemists who would make the science much younger by xiv FroceediiKjs of the Royal Society of Victoria. dating its birth from the publication of their own text- books, Fiom my present point of view, I would ask you to go back to the year 1863 as the date of the beginning of new things — to the year when Newlands first gave us the true principle for the classification of the elements — a principle afterwards extended by Lothar Meyer, Mendeleiefi", and others, and now so well known as the Periodic Law. This is by far the grandest and most fruitlul and far-reaching generalization of the past quarter century. It underlies much of the most important work of the present and of the future. If the known elements be arrano-ed in the order of their atomic weights, from hydrogen (1) to uranium (239), along a horizontal line, that line may be cut up into sections and these sections may be placed each below the last, in such manner that the elements which naturally resemble one another — which form a natural group — always fall in the same vertical line. To put it in another way — and a better way — we can construct a curve of which the magnitudes of the atomic weights are the abscissae and those of any pro- perty capable of exact measurement are the ordinates ; and we find that the curve, representing variation in the intensity of the property, is of a periodic character, and that similar elements occupy similar positions in the different periods. The properties of the elements (including the properties of their compounds) are therefore functions of the atomic weights. It follows from this, tliat it is highly desirable that our knowledge of the atomic weights of all known elements should be as exact as possible. The unit generally adopted as the standard for atomic weights is H = 1. But almost all actual determinations of atomic weights of other elements involve the previous know- ledge of the value of 0, or of the ratio O : H. This may be called the fundamental ratio, which underlies all others. If our knowledge of that ratio be inexact, then all deduced ratios, all our atomic weights, will be inexact in proportion, and the greater the atomic weight the greater will be the GItGmldry of To-day. xv Mctual en-or. The recognition of this fact has led, of late, to i-enewecl attempts to determine, by experiments of the most accurate kind, the precise value of this ratio O : H. Among the workers in this field during the past year or two, may be specially mentioned Scott and Lord Rayleigh in England, Crafts in France, Keiser, Cooke and Richards in America The results of these and other experiments may be summed up in the statement that, the value § is between 1601 and 15-869 ; and that the atomic weight of uranium (where the consequent error is necessarily greatest) is between 239'76 and 237'65. We must look to the future for further light. A glance at the table of the elements, arranged according to the periodic law, shows it is far from complete. Many of the elements whose existence is indicated by the law are not actuall}^ known to exist. They have never yet been met with. Is this from lack of knowledge merely, or do the gaps occur in Nature ? When this arrangement was first made use of, it was necessary to leave gaps where now we see the names of gallium, scandium, and germanium. May we not also expect the others to be filled up in a simihir manner? Here is one below manganese, between molyb- denum and the palladium metals, which wants filling by an element with an atomic weight of 99 or 100 and properties that might be fairly well pre-calculated. The most recent chemical journals that have reached us here in Melbourne, contain a brief preliminary notice of some results which Professor Krliss, of Munich, claims to have obtained in an investigation of cobalt and nickel. These elements have always been rather an enigma, from the fact of their possessing, not only very closely similar properties, but an almost identical atomic weight ; and our great English chemist, Crookes, has even said of them, that they might have been still regarded as one and the same element, had only their salts possessed the same colour instead of colours which are approximately complementary. Professor Kriiss now claims to have resolved the old cobalt and the old nickel each into two elements, one of which is common to xvi Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. the two, so that, if he can substantiate his claim, we shall have three elements — one the true cobalt, another the true nickel, and one new one. The true cobalt and the true nickel will not have the atomic weights we are accustomed to associate with those names, and an old mystery may thus be cleared up. But further, the new element will want a place in the systematic classification, and it seems to me possible — just ])0ssible — that our friend the 99 or 100 gap may now be filled. Chemists await with keen anxiety the arrival of journals with Professor Kriiss' complete accounts of his work ; till then, we must be cautious, even to the point of incredulity^ But, after all, shall we have arrived at the end of things when all the elements are discovered and their atomic weights and all their phj^sical and chemical properties have been accurately determined ? Is there nothing behind the elements ? What is the real nature of a so-called elementary atom, and what are we to understand by the phrase "atomic weights"? The wonderful and laborious researches of Crookes, Kmss, Nilson,and of others, on the so-called "rare earths" have led the first of these chemists (who is remarkable alike for skill in experiment, and the strength of his power of generalisa- tion) to put forward a theory that each resting point in the periodic classification marks the existence not of one element with an absolutely fixed atomic weight, but of a cluster of ^leto-elements as he calls them, substances barely distinguishable from one another by chemical means but capable of being differentiated by the spectroscope and of being separated by methods such as fractional precipitation, and that the atomic weight of an element is really only the mean of the atomic weights of the meta-elements which compose it — numbers varying from the mean within narrow limits. His theory further takes us into a most suggestive speculation concerning the genesis of the elements and their met;velements from one primordial form of matter, to which he has given the name o'i. protyle. Recent Progress in Biology. xvii Such a notion of the oneness of matter is by no means new, though there is much that is new in Crookes' special hypothesis. It is interesting to find another investigatoi" attacking the problem of the ultimate composition of the elements from a different point of view. Within the past two years, Professor Griinwald, of Prague, has published some most remarkable papers on the spectra of hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, magnesium, and cadmium ; the results of which may be summarized in his own words : — " Many, perhaps all, bodies hitherto considered as elements are compounds composed of condensation forms of the primary elements a and b of hydrogen (H^rba^) in various physical modifications." If this be proved, Griinwald will indeed have done a great work ; but we must look to the future, and meanwhile keep our minds open. SHORT ADDRESS ON RECENT PROGRESS IN BIOLOGY. By A. H. S. Lucas. In the unavoidable absence of Professor Spencer at our last meeting, I was asked by the Council to report on recent progress in Biology. It has been suggested to me that I should speak on the results of the " Challenger Expedition," inasmuch as the issue of the long series of Reports has come to an end, and the office in Edinburgh is now closed ; and the suggestion accords with my own inclination the more, since I shall have an opportunity at an early date of speaking on the more interesting local biological work of the year in another place. It were easy to fill ten minutes — my allotted time — in telling of this great enterprise, but it is not easy to compress xviii Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. all that ought to be said into ten minutes. The publication of the Reports can only be compared with that of the " Systema Naturte," or of the " Regne Animal," as a great epoch-marking work in biological science. Considered merely in a mechanical and material way, the Reports consist of some 34 thick quarto volumes. One single volume contains 1800 pages. These are illustrated by about 2000 full-size lithographic plates, several of which are coloured with precision. They record the results of critical examination of the specimens preserved in 2270 large glass jars, J 749 smaller bottles, 1860 glass tubes, 350 tin cases, and 22 casks. The cost of publication has considerably exceeded £50,000. Biologists owe much to the descriptions of the zoological and botanical specimens collected in the course ot previous vo3''ages, undertaken for scientific purposes. Systematists have continually to refer to the accounts of the voyage of the Erebus and Terror, the Astrolabe, the Novara, the Talisman, of the Wilkes' United States Exploring Expedition ; of the Beagle, the Samarang, and the Herald ; of the Lightning, Porcupine, and Knigiit Errant, of tlie United States Survey Expeditions, and of others ; but the Challenger Expedition is to these as Leviathan amongst fishes. There is scarcely a group of animals which is not reported on. There are memoirs relating; to Man, and memoirs on the Foraminifera and the Radiolaria. Owing to the tardiness of information from Europe, I cannot give the precise number of the memoirs, but the number is something over sixty-four. These are all contributed by men who are recognised as prominent specialists in the particular group which they have undertaken to describe. Professor Huxley, in a review of the first volume of the Reports, did not profess to have read it through, and dis- claimed the zoological omniscience which would justify him in criticising its contents in detail. No one else, then, need profess to have read all the volumes, or venture to give the palm of merit to this or that memoir. At most, one can but Recent Progress in Biology. xix mention a few of those which have perhaps more generally or more strikingly attracted attention, some from the enormous labour involved in their preparation, some from the novelty of the material described, and others from the interest of the general conclusions which have been worked out by the authors. Amongst them we may mention Professor Haeckel's magnificently illustrated monograph of the " Radiolaria ; " Mr. H. B. Brady's "Foraminifera," with its revelations of the pleomorphism of the group; Dr. P. H. Carpenter's "Crinoids,' of which beautiful forms he enumerates as many as 180 species, and reports that Australasia and Malaysia are amongst the strongholds of an order which was not so very long ago supposed to be on the verge of extinction ; Dr. Gunther's " Deep Sea Fishes ; " the three parts of Professor Herdman's "Tunicata; " the elaborate work on the "Echinoids" and " Ophiuroids " respectively ; of the American naturalists, Agassiz and Lyman ; the Sponge monographs of Sollas, Schulze, Polejaeff, Ridley, and Dendy ; Professor Busk's " Polyzoa," and Professor Allman's " Hydroida ; " Professor Moseley's beautiful work on " Millepora " and " Heliopora," and Mr. Botting Hemsley's comprehensive studies on the "Floras of Oceanic Islands." In many cases the writer gives a complete summary of what is known from all sources on the order of animals, of which the memoir treats. Thus, the Pteropods are completely reviewed by Professor Pelseneer, who concludes that these delicate pelagic molluscs may be ranged in a very few (genera, and that the entire order should be merojed in the Gastropods. Professor Allman discusses in full the classifi- cation of the Hydroida, Dr. Lyman that of the Brittle Stars, and so on. Such memoirs give the series of Reports much of the nature of an Encyclopaedia Zoologica. A bare enumeration of the authors, and the titles of their treatises, may recall the monotony of Homer's list of his lieroes. I can only excuse myself by retorting that, in my opinion, the workers of the Challenger are heroes, and that the great Zoological Reports constitute no mean epic. XX Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. Wherever opportunity offered, full anatomical details are given, as well as zoological characters. Indeed, it is hard to decide whether anatomists or systematists will be more helped by these publications. Embryological work is natur- ally scanty, but Professor W. K. Parker was enabled to make out the development of a type of Chelonia, wliich was previously but very imperfectly known. It is interesting to note that he refers to the Leathery Turtle {SpUargis coriacea), which is occasionally to be met with in our Melbourne Fish Market, as the living form which best retains the indications of its ancestry. The voyage lasted from 1873 to 1876. The first Keport appeared in 1880, and the work is just completed. Eminent foreign, as well as British, sclents were invited to assist, and one result has been to show that English and American biologists are able to produce work which in magnitude, in thoroughness, and in artistic beauty, can compare favourably with that of any other workers in the world. The naturalists who accompanied the Expedition were Sir Wyville Thomson, Mr. Moseley, Dr. Willemoes Suhm, and Mr. John Murray. The credit of the general direction of the zoological work belongs to Sir Wyville Thomson. We have to regret the early death of Dr. Willemoes Suhm. Just as the voyage in the Beagle exercised great influence in shaping Charles Darwin's powers, so to that of the Challenger is due that opportunity of expansion was given to Mr. (since Prof) Moseley and Mr. John Murray. So well-equipped were the naturalists, and so judicious and careful was their work, that 1 believe one may say with strict accuracy, that no material which was acquired was lost to science. Besides adding vast numbers of new species to our lists, the Challenger gained for the world nearly all that is known of the fauna of the ocean basins, and the form under which life is maintained under the singular conditions of abyssal existence. The relations of the abyssal fauna to light, the enormous development or the abortion of the eye, the existence of remarkable phosphorescent organs, consti- Recent Developments in Public Hygiene. xxi tute a new and interesting chapter in the history of living organisms. Much light has been thrown on many more general questions. The mode of formation of barrier reefs and of atolls, the constitution of the abyssal oozes and their slow increase in depth, the nature of the red clay, the ways and means of geographical distribution, have been carefully studied, and our knowledge of them greatly extended. Here I must close, but not without recording my pleasure that we have two Challenofer workers amone'st us — Dr. Wild, who accompanied the Expedition, and Mr. Dendy, who described the Monaxonid sponges. It will also, 1 think, be of interest to members to know that several of tlie specialists who wrote for the Challenger, are assisting us in the identification of the forms obtained by jonv Port Phillip Biological Survey Committee. SHORT ADDRESS ON THE RECENT DEVELOP- MENTS IN PUBLIC HYGIENE. By James Jamieson, M.D. In the limited time at my disposal, it is most desirable that I should confine my remarks on recent hygienic progress, to one or two matters of large general interest. Perhaps no fact, in connection with modern sanitation and its results, is more striking than the great improvement which has taken place of late years in the death rate in the great towns of England. In the ten years 1871-80, the mortality averaged 24 per 1000 of the population, while in the years 1881-87 it averaged only 21-4 per 1000, and in 1887 was as low as 208. A remarkable contrast is to be xxii Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. found in the condition of Melbourne, which, as regards sanitation, seems as if it had been entirely out of the tide of progress. In the ten years 1871^80 the death rate was 20'36 per 1000 ; and in the eight years 1881-88 it averaged 20-21; the rate for 1887 being 21 •25, and for 1888, 20-54. It cannot be said, of course, that nothing has been done to improve the public health ; but, as the results are not to be seen in the figures just given, it must be concluded that our efforts, sucli as they have been, have simply prevented us from suffering fally the evil effects arising from increasing density of population and its associations. A special instance may be taken, as helping to account for the remarkable difference which we have found to exist between our own " Marvellous Melbourne " and the English towns and cities. I prefer to take ty])hoid fever, as being with us a perennial subject of interest. In the years 1870- 1877, the death i-ate from fever, chiefly typhoid, in the great towns of England, averaged 6 per 10,000 of the population, while in the years 1877-1886 it had fallen to 3-2, and in 1887, to 2-2 per 10,000. The following has been the state of things in Melbourne, at corresponding periods. In the 3"ears 1871-1878, the typhoid mortality was in the proportion of 78 per 10,000 of the population, and in 1881-1888 it was 7'3 ; the rates for the last two years, 1887 and 1888, being respectively 9"1 and 7*7. While our typhoid mortality has remained practically the sajne, in the English towns it has been reduced to about one-third of what it was less than twenty years ago. There can be no doubt, I think, that the sanitary'- improve- ments which have been operative in bringing about this great reduction in the prevalence of ty})hoid in the English towns, have also had the chief share in lowering the general death rate. It is of no small importance, therefore, to know the cause of our failure to attain a similar i-esult. We know more now, than we did twenty years ago, about the nature and causes of the disease, and definite rules for its prevention Recent Developments in Pitblic Hygiene. xxiii have been formulated, and generally accepted as correct ; and yet, from all that increase of knowledge, we seem to have received no practical benefit. The reason is to be dis- covered from a consideration of the causes by which the spread of typhoid is chiefly favoured. One of these is a contaminated water supply, and an interesting confirmation has lately been supplied of the belief long held about its importance. There is very satisfactory evidence that the specific germ which produces the disease, has been discovered, and this typhoid bacillus has been repeatedly discovered in water, which had been used for drinking purposes, and which had been suspected as the cause of local outbreaks. But I greatly doubt, whether this cause plays any consider- able part in bring about our high tj^phoid mortality. The sources are now more carefully guarded than they were a few years ago ; and besides, the circumstances which attend its prevalence here are not those characteristic of epidemics due to contaminated water, as they have been seen in many places. Our outbreaks are not explosive ; the disease, year after year, taking a decidedly epidemic character in November or December, increasing steadily in prevalence till about March, and then declining slowly till it almost ceases in the early winter months. Our water supply is certainly better than that of most European towns, and it is not likely to be materially improved ; and so, unless there is some other cause in operation, we can hardly expect to see much lowering of our death rate. The use of contaminated milk has for a considerable time been recognised as a mode by which typhoid is communi- cated. It may be accidental contamination through the medium of water, which has itself been polluted with typhoid discharges, or by gross carelessness on the part of those who handle milk after having been in contact Avith a patient, or with soiled linen, &c., from his person. Quite recently it has been alleged that cows suffer from a form of disease, such that their milk may be capable of producing typhoid in those who drink it. It has often been alleged. xxiv Proceedings of the Royal Society of VictoHa. also, that from the mere fact of a cow feeding on garbage of various kinds, its milk may acquire infective properties. If there were such different ways whereb}^ the milk of cows is rendered infective, I can hardly think that it would be so difficult to get proof of the occurrence of outbreaks due unmistakably to contaminated milk. Since the Jolimont case, about ten years ago, there has not been a single instance traced out in this City, and my own experience has compelled me to conclude that milk contamination is actually a rare mode of spreading contagion, no single instance having come under my notice during my term of service as Health Officer of the City. It is different, I believe, with another mode by which typhoid is spread, viz., as a result of bad or defective drainage. I have often been satisfied that there was no other cause in operation adequate to account for severe and persistent local outbreaks of the disease. Evidence has actually been supplied that the tyi^hoid bacillus may live in ordinary well or river water ; and the close association often found to exist between typhoid and sewer emanations supplies a strong probability, amounting almost to certainty, that they may live, and possibly multiply, not only in cesspits, drains, and sewers, but also in soil soaked with sewage matters. The bacilli have not been found in, and would be difficult to isolate from the combination of bac- terial forms which find lodgment and breeding ground in sewage matter ; but if they do happen to be present there, it is almost a certainty that they would escape in the currents of foul air which rise from the outlets of town sewers. Such air does contain many bacterial forms, as has lately been proved by the investigations of Dr. J. D. Robertson {British. Medical Journal, 15th December, 1888). He did not find on his cultivation plates the bacillus of typhoid, doubtless, as he says, because there were no epidemics at the time of his observation ; but he did recognise that in sewer air there is a larger proportion of bacilli compared with other organisms, than in the open Recent Developments in Public Hygiene. xxv air of streets. It appears, therefore, that sewage matters provide a good breeding ground for that particular class of micro-organisms, to which the infecting agent of typhoid belongs. Evidence of an exact and positive kind is there- fore accumulating in favour of the view which, in my opinion, hardly admits of doubt that — defective drainage is the real cause of the great prevalence of typhoid in Melbourne. In that, and in our bad system of nightsoil disposal, we have insanitary conditions fullj^ adequate to account for the great and continued prevalence of the disease, and I can see no hope of such inijDrovement as has come about in the English towns, till we adopt their sanitary methods. It is vain to put our trust in disin- fectants. The cure consists in the adoption of a system of drainage, whereby all household slops, all liquid refuse, and nightsoil with it, are swept away at once from the neighbourhood of our houses. If that were done, our scavenging would also be comparatively an easy problem. An underground system of drainage can and must be carried out, and in the saving of life and health there would be ample repayment of the cost. There are certain diseases of animals which human beings may acquire. In addition to various forms of parasites, mention need only be made of anthrax, glanders, hydro- phobia, and the familiar cow-pox, which, by the method of vaccination, has come to be looked on rather as a preventive than as in itself a disease ; but in all these cases, the spread from animal to man is either a comparatively rare accident, or at least, as in the case of vaccination, has to be deliberately produced. It can hardly be said, indeed, that we are acquainted with any disease of this general class, which spreads freely from animals to human beings by what may be called ordinary methods of contagion. In the same way, none of the general zymotic diseases which affect human beings, spread easily to the lower animals if the latter, indeed, are susceptible of contagion at all. This circumstance has made, and will make, it difficult to obtain xxvi Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. conclusive evidence that such diseases as cholera, typhoid, small-pox, and measles owe their origin to living germs, the final test being that the germs, when cultivated pure, are capable, by inoculation or otherwise, of again producing the disease. Till quite recently, this want of relation with any disease of animals was held to be notably the case with scarlet fever. The chief mode by which it spreads, as an epidemic, is undoubtedly by way of direct or indirect contagion from person to person. There have been a few instances, generall}'- accepted as well authenticated, in which the contagion seemed to be conveyed through the medium of milk. But it was always taken for granted, even when it was not clearly proved, that the milk had become contaminated by access to it of scales from the skin, or other infecting particles from the body, of a patient suffering from the disease. It came, therefore, as a startling novelty, when, in 1886 it was announced, on good authority, that an outbreak of scarlet fever in a district of London, had not only been traced to the use of milk, but that this milk got its contagious properties, not b}" con- tamination with particles from a scarlatina patient, but by the circumstance that it was derived from diseased cows. Experiments were made by Dr. Klein, the well-known bacteriologist and microscopist, and the circumstances and surroundings of the dairy were carefully inquired into by Dr. Power, one of the most experienced Inspectors of the Local Government Board. The cows were found to be suffering, not only from general signs of illness, but from a disease affecting the udder and teats. From the sores on these parts. Dr. Klein obtained bacterial forms, which he declared to be similar to those which he also found in the bodies of scarlet fever patients. He further made pure cultures of the special organism from both sources, and by inoculation on calves, produced a form of illness, which resembled in different respects, both the scarlatina of man and the disease from which the cows had suffered. On inquiry, it did not appear that there were cases of scarlatina Recent Developments in Public Hygiene. xxvii at or near the dairy, from wliich contamination of milk in the way usually accepted, could have taken place. Dr. Buchanan, the head of the Medical Department under the Privy Council, accepted the evidence as conclusive, the medical world was taken by storm, and the " Hendon cow disease " was everywhere talked of as the clearly established source of an outbreak of milk scarlatina. It seemed proper that the veterinary authorities should make an independent inquiry, and the services of Professor Crookshank, a recognised authority on questions of bacteriology, were engaged. In the reports which have since been issued, it is stated that the so-called Hendon disease is well known to cow keepers and veterinary surgeons, who describe it as cow-pox, and the experiments made by Professor Crook- shank were considered by him to establish this belief It was further stated that there had been scarlet fever in a house not veiy far from the daiiy, and that there had been constant communication between the two places. The very remarkable fact further came out, that though the milk was considered to have caused scarlet fever among persons living in London, it had no such effect among the persons living at or near the dairy, who regularly consumed it. It was further stated that, in two adjacent dairies, the cows suffered from a similar disease to those at Hendon, but that there was never any suspicion that the milk from these had caused scarlet fever. So the question at present stands, after a good deal of heated controversy ; and on a review of the whole evidence, it seems as if Drs. Klein and Power had been somewhat hasty in coming to conclusions, and the latest reports of outbreaks of scarlet fever, occurring more or less in coincidence with the occurrence of signs of illness among the cows supplying milk, are by no means conclusive. The question has great practical, as well as theoretical interest; for if such a dangerous disease as scarlet fever may be produced by the milk o± cows suffering from some kind of disease, it is of the utmost importance that the nature and symptoms of that disease should be clearly defined, in order xxviii Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. that precautions may be taken. Its identification, too, might lead to important results, by bringing nearer the probability of attaining some system of prevention analogous to vaccination against small-pox. But another very import- ant point is also raised. If scarlatina can actually be produced in this way, it will be necessary to go back and review the evidence, as to the mode of production of former milk epidemics. Were they really due, as supposed, to contamination of the milk with infecting particles from a scarlet fever patient ? In that way, indeed, the whole question of the spread of disease by means of contaminated milk is again brought up for open discussion. The effect has been to call forth a quantity of evidence in opposition to the view that scarlatina is readily produced by con- taminated milk. In the " Report on Eruptive Diseases of the Teats and Udders in Cows," recently issued by the Agricultural Department, there is given in an appendix a report by Dr. Hime, on his observations in Bradford during a very severe epidemic of scarlet fever in 1887 He narrates a number of instances of scarlet fever occurring among children living at dairies, and yet among the families supplied there was almost complete immunity from the disease. He had also occasion to inquire into the cause of outbreaks occurring among the customers of particular milksellers, without being able in any instance to discover that the suspicion which had fallen on the dairy was in any way well founded. His conclusion was that if, under conditions so favourable to the spread of infection, it did not occur, it is more than probable that there must be the greatest difficulty in milk becoming infected. At a meeting of the Epidemiological Society of London in December last, a paper was read by Dr. Shirley Murphy, on " The Sanitary Administration of Dairy Farms." His object was to point out the need of legislation, to guard against the spread of disease among dairy cows, and against the infection of milk. Referrino; to the risk of milk becoming contaminated by particles from scarlet fever Recent Developments in Public Hygiene. xxix patients, he gave his experience of a public institution, in which the milk was for years exposed daily to the risk of infection, by being carried through wards containing scarlet fever patients, without any appreciable effect upon persons who afterwards drank it. The milk was sometimes even further in danger of being contaminated by being served out by a woman who was actuall}^ attending on the patients, and yet it did not produce the disease. All this, of course, is only negative evidence, and Dr. Murphy's object was not so much to oppose the doctrine, that milk thus contaminated may cause scarlatina, as to enforce the need of careful examination of the cows them- selves, whenever milk is suspected of being the medium of conveying infection. Under any circumstances, nothing but benefit to the public health can result from full inquiry into all such disputed questions. The whole matter shows further, how necessary it is to keep ourselves open to the influence of fresh knowledge, and be ready, if necessary, to amend even what we had come to look on as settled doctrines. As regards the two diseases to which I have referred, the main points about their infectivity and mode of spread, remain untouched. In connection with typhoid, we have to guard against impure water supply and insanitary surroundings ; and in the case of scarlet fever, we must trust to isolation and disinfection, on account of the intense contagiousness of the disease. SHORT ADDRESS ON GEOLOGICAL PROGRESS. By G. S. Griffiths, F.G.S. The past year has been marked by no special feature a» far as Australian Geology is concerned. The geological staffs of the various Colonies have continued to extend their surveys, wliilst private observers have added to our knowledge of the interior and other parts. Mr. Jack's discovery of cretaceous fossils in the lower beds of the desert sandstone of Western Queensland — confirmed as the age of these has since been by Professor Tait, after an examination of the fossils — is an event of great importance. The chalk beds of the coasts of Victoria and South Australia, between Portland Bay and the Murray mouth, have been further investigated, and the fossils collected by Mr. Dennant and others have led Professor Tait to remove the lower stratum from the Miocene, to which the Rev. Julian Woods had assigned it, into the Eocene. In New South Wales, the findino- of a well-preserved labyrinthodont at Biloela, enables Professor Stephens to confirm the Triassic age of the Hawksbury sandstone. Some very interesting remains of ganoid fishes have been unearthed near Mansfield by Mr. G. Sweet, who will shortly ])ublish particulars of this Old Red Sandstone deposit. In Western Australia the carboniferous area on the coast is receiving attention, and Mr. R. M. Johnson, of Tasmania, is prepaiing a comprehensive work upon the geology of that island. To turn from local developments to the recent history of the science in Europe, I notice that an important Congress of Geologists has been discussing the principles of geological map making, with a view to unify practice in relation to coloration and symbols, and to simplify the terminology. These objects must have our entire sympathy, and if they can be secured, the study of the science will be distinctly asssisted. Geological Progress. xxxi The important branch of Vulcanology has made an invalu- able addition to its literature, with the publication, by the Royal Society of Great Britain, of the report of its Committee upon the Krakatoa eruption. That body comes to the conclusion, that the extrusion of the volcanic matter of an eruption is due, not to the presence of water in the magma, but to the occlusion of potentially gaseous compounds, formed by chemical interaction between some of the heated minerals. This important generalisation has been dubbed the "Cartridge theory," as it pre-supposes that there are in the crust of the globe certain strata which, being heated, generate within themselves explosive gases, which thereupon rend the over- lying rocks, and then by their expansion, expel the molten magma in which they are entangled. According to this view, the paroxysmal outbursts which so frequently mark volcanic emissions, are due to the accidental admission to the^ lava of quarry water, which nearly always saturates all the rocks forming the walls of the upper part of the rent- Another subject which was discussed at the recent Geological Congress, is the nature and origin of the crystalline schists. Whilst a great diversity of opinion prevailed between the greatest living geological authorities, in relation to many important but open questions bearing upon this class of rock, the tendency of the discussions reveals a widely held belief that the schistose characteristics of gneiss have been developed by the dynamic strains incidental to the process of mountain building ; and also, that any kind of rock subjected to this intense pressure may be transformed into gneiss, whether it be of sedimentary, organic, or plutonic oiugin. These matters are the principal points which come under notice in reviewing the geological progress made during the past year. SHORT ADDRESS ON LITERATURE AND THE FINE ARTS. By James Edward Neild, M.D. The title of this short paper is comprehensive, and there is very much more to be said thereon than can be compressed in the ten minutes allotted to me ; but as I have an end to serve, namely, the formulation of a section not as yet formu- lated, and as my purpose can be achieved as easily in ten minutes as in two hours, I accept the limitation. I will not attempt a history of the subject, even in epitome. I will not even try to describe what has recently been done in the domain of Literature and Art, for even within these confines it would be impossible to set forth, even categorically, what has of late been accomplished in the di)'ection of books, pic- tures statues, and buildings. I will be provincial, and I will use only so much of the limited material at my command, as to draw attention to the much-regretted neglect by the Royal Society, of Section G, which, as you know, takes in Literature and the Fine Arts, including Architecture. And considering that the first clause of the Laws of the Society declares that the institution was founded for the advance- ment of Science, Literature, and Art, it is at least remarkable, that, hitherto, the operations of the Society have been almost exclusively confined to the consideration of the first of these subjects. In Law 53, it will be observed, provision is made for departmental work, this being defined in an enumeration of eight sections, all of them, however, curiously enough, having reference to Science, except Section G, which, as I have intimated, deals with " Literature and the Fine Arts, including Architecture." I am quite sure it is not because these subjects have been considered of subordinate import- Literature and the Fine Arts. xxxiii ance that they have not been dealt with, neither has it been supposed, I think, that in a new country such as this, the belles lettres are incongruous or premature. It is possible that it may have been deemed unnecessar}'^ to take them into consideration, in the belief that societies exist here, having a special mission to concern themselves with Art and Literature. In any case, it is a cause of regret that Section G has, up to the present, never been developed. I should very nmch like, therefore, to assist in developing Section G. I am aware that it has been asserted, sometimes regretfully, sometimes scornfully, that we have no Australian literature other than periodical literature, and that periodical literature comprises newspapers and very little else. It is true we do not produce many books, and it is not less true that of the books we do produce, some of them are not worth keeping. But after you have well sifted all the books which all the colonies have given to the Australian world, there will remain a residuum which, small as it is, represents a literature of its own kind. Among the many writers of verse, there have been some poets ; among the numerous story-tellers, there have been a few whose tales are worth preserving ; there are historians whose records it would be a calamity to lose, and we have had essayists whose writings deserve to become classical. In respect of dramatic writing, we have not achieved much distinction. In part proof of this, I may mention that, during the last twenty-five years, I have read about 300 plays in manuscript, and I am obliged to say that I could not recommend more than five of these to the consideration of managers, and even this recommenda- tion was hesitatingly conceded. The bulk of our Australian literature, therefore, is periodical ; that is to say, it consists of newspapers ; and of this kind of literature, we have a good deal. I have to admit that a large proportion of it is of a superior kind, and that some of it is of a high-class character. I am not unaware that another proportion of it is of an opposite degree of excellence. I am not now speaking, nor need I be expected to speak, of the moral tone of Australian xxxiv Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. newspapers, but only of their literary quality ; and, basing my assertion upon a good deal of experience, I say with confidence, that the literary quality of the newspapers, in Victoria at any rate, is, with exceptions of course, of a kind upon which we may congratulate ourselves. Whatever literary feeling there may be in Victorian society, therefore, is to a large extent derived from, and is built upon, the newspapers. We have proportionally a much larger number of newspapers than they have in the old country. There are hundreds of towns in England, of considerable size, that have no public journal whatever; whereas in this colony, the very smallest township has some kind of newspaper. There is thus an extensive diffusion of information, and every member of the community is indebted to the newspaper for a great deal of the knowledge he possesses. But we also import books in great numbers from the old countries of the world, and it is by no means exceptional, nowadays, for persons of even moderate means to possess libraries often of considerable size. It is true that not a few persons of means that are much more than moderate, have no libraries at all; and that of those who have them, some never read them. The story is extant of a gentleman, belonging to the extremely wealthy lower orders, who, having been persuaded to include in the plan of a new house he was building a library, ordered his books from England by the ton. He said it simplified matters to send for two tons. I myself have been in houses where the decorator had carte blanche given him, but in which the library did not number more than fifty volumes. For all this we are, by comparison, a reading people, and as far as reading may induce the literary faculty, a writing people. The letters that from time to time appear in the newspapers, may be accepted in demonstration of this latter proposition ; and they probably do not represent more than a tithe of those actually written, I am not going to say that all such letters indicate marked literary skill, but they certainly represent a good deal of such skill, and some of Literature and the Fine Arts. xxxv them are veritable essays, not unworthy the trouble of pre- serving. It would be untrue to say, that a newspaper- reading people is of necessit}' a literary community. The Americans, as we all know, have more newspapers in proportion to population than an}' other nation in the world, but as a people, they cannot certainly be regarded as literary, and tliey themselves have confessed that they are not an educated people. I justify this statement by reminding you that a not undeservedly popular lecturer from the United States, who visited these colonies only a few years since, told us tliat 5,000,000 of the 50,000,000 of the great republic, over ten years of age, could not even read ; that 6,250,000 could not write ; that of the 10,000,000 of voters in the States, one in five could not write his name ; that of the 10,000,000 of children enrolled in the public schools, 7,500,000 were in absolute ignorance of the English alphabet. He further said that in .34 cities, from 50 to 84 per cent, of the children were not enrolled in schools at all ; that in 80 cities, the average attendance at school was only f of the enrolment ; that in New York, 200,000 children had never been to school at all ; that in Chicago only a third of the children went to school ; and that in St. Louis, out of a population of 106,000 persons, 50,000 were growing up literally savages. These particulars were offered only as samples of the literary destitution there prevailing, and they were supplied by an American. Now in Victoria, according to the last completed Year Book, nearly 95 per cent, of the children at the school age were being educated either at state or private schools. It does not follow, of course, that education as we know it, confers the literary faculty, but at least it supplies a ground work for a beginning. We may claim, therefore, that as we have here educational facilities if not superior to those of other states, yet equal to most of those who are best supplied, we ought to be a literary community. The misfortune is, that many who enter upon a literary career, appear to think that the calling requires no special xsxv Proceedings of tJie Royal Society of Victoria. training. It is not objected that tlie calling is taken up in supplement of other callings, but because it is not the principal avocation, it seems as if it were regarded as unnecessary to study tlie art of literary composition syste- matically. A well-known epigrammatist has said, that it requires five years to learn to be a cabinet-maker, but that one may become an author in half an hour. The reply to this was, that it was witty, bat false, for that a literary man has to undergo a long apj^renticeship. His school-life, his college- life, his travels, his hearing, seeing, reading, observing, suffering, all are parts of his training. Then with all this training, he has often to work at labour he does not love, and his writing has to be done furtively, or in the intervals of his enforced daily work. Going back for historic examples, we find that Hesiod was an agriculturist, Thucydides a general, Xeuophon a com- mander, Plato and Aristotle schoolmasters. Cicero morever, was a politician, Varro a soldier, Horace first a soldier, then a secretary. And to come nearer to our own times, La Rochefoucauld was a courtier, Montesquieu a judge, Chateaubriand a sub-lieutenant, and Balzac a reader of proofs. And then, as we know, Shakspeare was an actor, Byron a lord, Grote a banker, Dickens a reporter. Cooper a consul, Bancroft a minister, Emerson a pastor, and Oliver Wendell Holmes is a physician. I suppose no man, nor no woman, ever set out upon the journey of life, with the set purpose of being an author, and yet an author, worthy of the name, requires a training harder a great deal than that needed for any other vocation. Professor Huxley recently said, " I fancy we are the only nation in the world who seem to think that composition comes by nature. The French attend to their own language, the Germans study their's, but Englishmen do not seem to think it worth their while." As Dogberry has it, so they apparently think that "reading and writing come by nature." Literature and the Fine Arti^. xxxvii It is a melancholy thing, however, when a consciousness of the writing- faculty prompts the possessor, he not being a poet, to make verses. Christopher North, it will be remembered by those who are familiar with his now not much read, but undeservedly neglected works, especially the Nodes AmbivsioMce, begins one of his reviews with this epigrammatic declaration — " All men, women, and children, are poets, except those who write verses." And at a some- what later period, it will be remembered that Carlyle wrote, in acknowledgment of a sonnet he had received from his friend, Dr. W. C. Bennett, as follows : — " Your name, hitherto, is known to me chiefly as associated with verse. It is one of my constant i^egrets, in this generation, that men to whom the gods have given a genius, which means a light of intelligence, of courage and all manfulness, or else means nothing, will insist in such an earnest time as ours has grown, in bringing out their divine gift in the shape of verse, which now no man reads entirely in earnest. That a man has to bring out his gift in words of any kind, and not in silent divine actions, which alone are fit to express it well, seems to me a great misfortune for him ; but that he should select verse with its half credibilities and other sad accompani- ments, when he might have prose and be wholly credible, if he desired it, this I lay at the door of our Spiritual teachers (pedants mostly, and speaking an obsolete dialect), who thereby incalculably rot the world, making him who might have been a soldier and fighter (so terribly wanted just at present), a mere preacher and idle singer. This is a fixed perception of mine, growing ever more fixed these many years ; and I ofier it to you as I have done to many othei's in the like case, not much hoping that you will believe in it at once. But certainly a good, wise, earnest, piece in prose from you, would please me better than the musicalest verses could." God forbid that I should discourage the true poet from scattering his pearls upon the earth. A genuine poet is a creature to be worshipped, but although there may be only xxxviii Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. one real poet in a million of men, there may be many eloquent writers who are no poets ; and of these, I am sure there is a large quota in Victoria. I should like to gather some of them together under Section G. Then of the " Fine Arts, including Architecture." Con- cerning this hitter, if I were to say all I think at this moment, I should make every Victorian architect my deadly enemy, for this Marvellous Melbourne, in my judgment, is only a large collection of architectural eyesores. It is an ocean of ugliness, with a very few small islets of beauty ; a wilderness of brick and stucco, with here and there an oasis of honest masonry. Of sculpture we have not much, and this little is chiefly imported. The examples at the National Gallery are many of them melancholy illustrations of probably good intention^ but disastrous ill-judgment on the part of the buyer. I except the majority of the casts, especially from the antique. It is the marbles, for the most part, that make me sad. The latest of these illustrations of imperfect judgment in the selection is The Bull and the Herdsman by Boehm. The sculptor of this work, R. A. though he be, furnishes, I think, another instance of mis- directed talent. It is especially the purpose of sculpture, I take it, to elevate, to refine, to exalt the mind above gross surround- ings. And I do not think a bull and a bull-keeper suggest any thoughts that are elevated, refined, or exalted. The work- manship of this piece of statuary is excellent, no doubt. The thing is as like a bull as it is possible to make it in marble, but I will not believe that excellence of technical handicraft represents the highest condition of art. A turnip, a pumpkin, a mangel-wurzel, a stump of a tree, a sack of potatoes, a wheelbarrow, might all be carved in marble, and they might demand from the sculptor great manij^ulative skill, but what then? They would still be severally turnips, ])umpkins, mangel-wurzels, tree-stum]:)s, potato-sacks, and wheelbarrows. They would lead you up to nothing higher than themselves ; and so of this marble bull. Such a work would be appro- priate enough for a tavern sign, or as the centre-piece of an Literature and the Fine Arts. xxxix agricultural hall ; or a successful grazier might have it ei-ected in his front garden, but it is only a perplexing incongruity where now it stands. It may help to teach a mere stone cutter, but not a sculptor. We have a gallery of pictures, and some of them might well enough remain where they are, both to please the public and to instruct the students ; others might be removed to a separate gallery, and kept as examples to show the students what to avoid. And, indeed, it would do a great many people, other than students, good to be taught what kind of pictures they should not hang up in their houses. In the dwelling-places of even well-informed people are to be found literally chambers of pictorial horrors, and yet they excite no distress in the minds of the possessors, because these ill- advised, although possibly inoffensive, persons do not know what a picture worthy of the name of picture is. But another class of people are even worse than these, for they suffer from a form of pictorial blindness, and variously paint, or buy, pictures which make a healthy-minded man shudder at the sight of them. We had some of these morbid specimens in the Grosvenor Gallery when it was with us twelve months ago, and I am afraid they did harm by demoralising the feeble art principles of divers invertebrate persons, who are much swayed by authority, and incapable of thinking for themselves. Happily, we have in Mr. Folingsby now a whole-souled, healthy-minded director of our art school, and the students he fi'om time to time turns out are similarly whole-souled and healthy-minded too. They paint honest pictures, every one of which has a meaning, and sets you thinking of their meaning,- an effect which every good picture is capable of doing. I do not think our art students are likely to be ever corrupted into the heresy of painting " Scapegoats," or " Triumphs of Innocents." But Mr. rolingsb3''s good teaching should be extended, and made a more general use of No doubt there are some good drawing masters in Victoria, but judging by such examples as I very often see, the drawing masters themselves xl Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. cannot draw. And as to teaching the principles of pictorial art, it is practically unthouglit of. For besides technical skill, a student should, I think, be instructed how to distinguish between what is essentially picturesque, and what is not. Sala some years ago said, " He who can draw, be it ever so badly, has a dozen extra preference shares in every land- scape, shares that are perpetually paying golden dividends. He can not only see the fields and mountains, tlie rivers and brooks, but he can eat and drink them. The flowers are a continual feast, and when the rain is on them, and after that the sun, they may be washed down with richest wines. To the artistic eye, there are inexhaustible pleasures to be found in the meanest objects. There are rich studies of colour in a brick wall; of form in every hedge and stunted pollard; of light and shade in every heap of stones on the macadamised road ; of more than pre-Raffaelite stippling and finish in every tuft of herbage and wild flower. The shadow cast by a pigstye on a road ; by an omnibus driver's reins on his horses' backs ; the picturesque form of a donkej^'-cart ; the rags of a travelling tinker ; the drapery-folds in a petticoat hung out to dry on a clothes line in the back yai'd ; the rugged angularities of the lumps of coal in the grate ; the sharp light upon the decanters at home — all these are fruitful themes for musing and speculative pleasure. The fisherman who can draw, has ten times more enjoyment in his meditative pursuit, than the inartistic angler. An acquaintance with art, takes roods, perches, furlongs from the journey ; for however hard the ground may be, however dreary the tract of country through which we journey, though our twenty miles may lie in the whole distance between dead walls, have we not always that giant scrap book the sky above us — the sky with all its varieties of colour, its rainy fringes, its changing forms and aspects ? I would not have a man look upon the heavens in a purely paint-pot spirit ; I would not have him consider every sky as merely so much Naples-yellow, crimson-lake, and cobalt-blue, with Literature and the Fine Arts. xli Hake-white clouds spattered over it by a dexterous move- ment of the palette knife ; but I would have him bring an artist's eye, and an artist's mind to the heavens above." Moreover, I would have students taught the reason why one class of lines, or forms, or colours, gratifies the eye more than another. Max Muller some time ago explained anatomically the reason of the universal admiration bestowed upon curves instead of straight lines. He told us, that the eye is moved in its orbit by six {i.e., the four recti and the two oblique) muscles, of which four (the recti) are respectively employed to raise, depress, turn to the right, and to the left. The other two (the oblique) have an action contrary to each other, and roll the eye on its axis, or from the outside down- ward, and inside upward. When therefore an object is pre- sented for inspection, the first act is that of circumvision on going round the boundary lines, so as to bring consecutively every individual portion of the circumference upon the most delicate and sensitive portion of the retina. Now, if figures bounded by straight lines be presented for inspection, it is obvious that but two of these muscles can be called into action, and it is equally evident that in curves of a circle or ellipse, all must alternately be brought into action ; the effect then is, that if only two be employed, as in rectilinear figures, those two have an undue share of labour, and by repeating the experiment frequently, as we do in childhood the notion of tedium is instilled, a distaste for straight lines is gradually formed, and we are led to prefer those curves which supply a more general and equable share of work to the muscles. This explanation, it will be seen, happily introduces science into the province of art, and there can be no question, that both high art and pure literature may occasionally profit by invoking aid from Science. The drawing taught in our State Schools, and in the so-called Schools of Design, if we may judge by the work of the pupils occasionally exhibited, is of a very mechanical kind. The examples, for the most part, show neither taste, feeling, originality, nor technical facility. No art principles xlii Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. appear to be inculcated, no obligation is enforced of the pupil thinking for himself. It is a neglect of this kind that I hope will be pointed out by means of this section, and in this way we may aid, not inconsiderably, in the general scheme of State education ; a scheme which in particulars, other than those of art-knowledge, is greatly in need of amendment. .;-,.* ^^^^D^ <^