Olt’ \ sosdsdodnbasduaabaseoedd sanders vos ccd eeslves 771
Giraffa camelopardalis thornicrofti, Description of ... 771
On the 20th of October, 1910, the British Museum (Nat. Hist.)
received from Mr. H. Thornicroft, Native Commissioner, Petauke,
North-east Rhodesia, the skin, skull, and limb-bones of an adult
male Giraffe shot by himself in that district. Mr. Thornicroft
had previously called on me in London, and expressed his willing-
ness to shoot and present to the Museum a Giraffe from the
single herd in this part of Rhodesia, if the necessary permit could
be obtained. This was in due course procured, and was followed,
after an interval, by the arrival of the above-mentioned skin and
bones.
The skin was soon afterwads set up by Rowland Ward Ltd.,
and the mounted specimen placed in the big case at the head of
the staircase leading to the Hast Corridor of the Museum, along-
side the male and female of the East African Girajfa camelo-
pardalis rothschildi. As it is mounted with the neck bent, it is
difficult to ascertain the exact height, but I estimate this at close
on 18 feet, or possibly rather more.
When the specimen was installed in its case, it became essential
that it should receive a distinctive name; and I accordingly
communicated the following preliminary note to ‘ Nature’ + :—
“This Giraffe is characterised by the low and conical frontal
horn, the grey colour and scattered spotting of the sides of the
face, the chestnut-brown forehead, deepening into black on the
tips of the horns, the absence of a distinctly stellate pattern in
the neck and body spots, which are light brown on a yellowish
fawn ground, and the uniformly tawny colour of the lower portion
of the limbs, This Giraffe, which I propose to call Giraffa
camelopardalis thornicrofti, appears to be related to the Kiliman-
jaro G. c. tippelskirchi, but differs by the more compact frontal
horn, the brown, in place of grey, forehead, and the uniformly
fawn lower part of the legs, the latter being whitish in adult
bulls [of tippelskirchi|, but fawn and spotted in cows and young
bulls.”
The last statement rests on the authority of Messrs. M. de
* Published by permission of the Trustees of the British Museum.
+ For explanation of the Plate see p. 773.
~ Vol. Ixxxvii. p. 484 (1911).
172 ON THE NORTH RHODESIAN GIRAFFE.
Rothschild and H. Neuville*, who state that in the East African
Giraffe which they describe as rothschildi, but which—despite the
locality whence it is stated to come—is certainly tippelskirchi,
these age and sex differences are observable. I have, however,
doubts whether they hold good in all cases; and it is still possible,
in spite of what I have previously written, that there may be one
form (schillingsi) in which the shanks of adult bulls are white and
another (tippelskirchi) in which they are fawn and spotted 7, and
further, that these two types may intergrade.
That the nearest relative of the Rhodesian Giraffe is G. c. tip-
pelskirchi, may be considered certain. Of the latter I have had
for comparison the mounted head and neck of an adult male, a
mounted immature female, and the mounted head and neck of
a calf, as well as,a coloured plate in Messrs. de Rothschild and
Neuville’s memoir f.
Elaborating to a certain extent the foregoing brief diagnosis,
attention may be directed to the fact that tippelskirchi and
thornicrofti agree (and thereby differ markedly from rothschildi)
in having the triangular space between the eye and the nostril
devoid of spots. In the adult male of tippelskirchi, however, the
zround-colour of the whole head is dirty greyish white, whereas
in thornicrofti the forehead is chestnut or umber-brown, deepening
into black at the tips of the horns, which are grey in the
Kilimanjaro race.
In the Rhodesian Giraffe the spots on the region behind the
eye and the side of the lower jaw are very faintly marked, and
blackish grey in colour; whereas in the Kilimanjaro bull they
are larger, more numerous, and chocolate-brown in colour, being
deeper in tint than the neck-spots (this feature being also shown
in the immature female and the calf).
In thornicrofti the spots on the neck are burnt-umber in colour
and markedly elongated in form, with their terminal ends jagged. .
There are about eight of them in the longitudinal row which
starts immediately in advance of the point of the shoulder. In
tippelskirchi they are more numercus (ten or eleven in what
appears to be the corresponding row), less elongated, and much
more irregular in shape.
Compared with the young cow teppelskirchi, the spots on the
body of thornicrofti are less numerous, more especially on the
hind-quarters, while many of them are more deeply incised on one
side, although they are less jagged in general contour. The
spotting on the inner side of the thighs and of the upper part
of the fore-legs is also much less pronounced. In the original
description (which was drawn up when the specimen was in the
basement of the Museum) it is stated that the shanks of the
legs are uniformly fawn, but, as a matter of fact, they are
* Ann. Sci. Nat., Zool. ser. 9, vol. xiii. pp. 124, 129 (1911).
+ See Proc. Zool. Soc. 1904, vol. i. p. 219.
f Op. cit. pl. ii. fig. 1, lettered G. ¢. rothschildi.
ON ANTLER-GROWTH IN THE CERVIDZ. CUS
rufous-fawn with very faint traces of spotting nearly down to
the fetlocks; while from the latter to the hoofs they are dirty
greyish white. ‘
The foregoing evidence clearly establishes the right of the
North Rhodesian Giraffe to rank as a distinct local race; and if
it be true that the one herd is completely isolated, there is
probably no intergradation with the Kilimanjaro race.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE LXXXVI.
Adult bull of Giraffa camelopardaiis thornicrofti.
46. On Antler-Growth in the Cervide, with special reference
to Elaphurus and Odocoileus (Doreelaphus). By
R. I. Pococn, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.Z.8., Superintendent
of the Gardens and Curator of Mammals.
[Received and Read June 4, 1912.]
(Text-figures 108-112.)
InDEX.
Page
ClassmiGanmonne Gi ne Olnyiles oogrccssecte nda nconne oan ononseavsaraene 773
Mode of growth of Antlers in typical Old World Deer ...... 775
Interpretation of the Antlers of Hlaphurus davidianus ...... UTe
Interpretation of the Antlers of Odocoileus sp. incert. ...... 780
Date of Antler-change in American and Old World Deer ... 783 (Note)
Introduction.
Most, if not all, the attempts that have hitherto been made to
understand the antlers of Deer and arrive at correct conclusions
regarding the homology of the tines have been based upon com-
parisons between the fully formed antlers of different species.
This, in my opinion, is the reason why there has been failure in
some cases to detect homologies which study of the growth of
individual antlers reveals.
The importance of this question depends upon the circumstance
that twenty years ago Mr. Gordon Cameron * proposed a classi-
fication of the Cervide, based upon the antlers, as a substitute
for the classification, founded upon the skeletal structure of the
fore feet, which Sir Victor Brooke had suggested 7.
To make clear the purpose of the present paper, it is necessary
to summarise briefly the rival classifications put forward by these
two authors. Sir Victor Brooke divided the Cervide into two
* «The Field,’ 1892, pp. 265, 703, 741, 860.
+ P.Z.S. 1878, pp. 883-928.
Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1912, No. LIT.
or
i)
14 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON
sections. The first, which he called Telemetacarpi (Telemeta-
carpalia) because the distal ends of the lateral metacarpals
persist, comprises the Roe (Capreolus), the Chinese Water-Deer
(Hydropotes), the Reindeer (Rangifer), the Elk (Alce), and all the
exclusively American deer with the single exception of the typical
Wapiti (Cervus canadensis); the second, called Plesiometacarpi
(Plesiometacarpalia) because the proximal ends of the lateral
metacarpals are usually present, whereas their distal ends are
suppressed, comprises all the deer of the Old World, except
the four genera mentioned above, but none of those of the
New World apart from the Wapiti. Amongst the Old World
forms the most important species for’ the moment figuring
amongst the Plesiometacarpalia is Pére David’s Chinese Deer
(Hlaphurus davidianus).
Mr. Cameron’s classification was widely different. Dismissing
as unimportant the character relied upon by Brooke, he divided
the Cervide into three sections: one for the Reindeer with
antlers in both sexes, the second for the Elk with laterally
extended antlers, the third for the remaining species with antlers
restricted to the male and erect or suberect. This third section,
which alone concerns us now, was subdivided into two categories
of species, one comprising those in which the antlers consist, as
in the typical Old World deer and the Wapiti, of a ‘“ brow-tine”
and a “beam,” to use Gordon Cameron’s terminology, and the
other those in which the antler has, as he thinks, no brow-tine
but consists of a ‘forked beam,” as in all typical American deer
(except the Wapiti) and in the Roe and Pere David’s Deer
amongst the Old-World species.
Now with regard to the affinities of the species composing
Cameron’s third division, there is only one point in which there
is complete divergence between him and Brooke. This concerns
Pére David’s Deer, a species classified by Brooke with the Red
Deer, Sambar, and other Hlaphine stags, and by Cameron with
the American forms allied to the Virginian and Mule Deer, the
correct name of which seems to be Odocoileus *.
So far as I can see, the only @ priori objection to be raised
against Mr. Cameron’s system, if we accept his premises, is that.
it is based upon a secondary sexual character. But although it.
cannot be justifiably consigned to oblivion on that account, it may
be doubted if it would ever have come into sufficient prominence
for serious discussion had it not been for the unqualified acceptance
accorded it by Mr. Lydekker. However that may be, it is clear
that if Mr. Cameron’s assumption that there is a fundamental
difference in structure between the antlers of the groups of deer
mentioned above is wrong, his classification, based on that claim,
goes by the board.
In the following pages J shall endeavour to show that his
classification is untenable, because a study of the seasonal growth
* Dorcelaphus and Cariacus are better known but superseded terms.
ANTLER-GROWTH IN THE CERVIDA. 775
of an antler of Pére David's deer and of an American deer, allied
to the Virginian, proves that the homologue of the brow-tine of
the Elaphine stage is present in both—a conclusion which is by
no means evident from an examination of the fully-formed
antlers.
Antler-Growth in typical Old-World Deer.
In the Zoological Gardens I have repeatedly watched, year
after year, the growth of the antlers of deer belonging to the
Elaphine, Sikine, and Rusine ty es without finding any variation
Text-fig. 108. /
b
---2
Wr MW! . SS
C 3 wn
BD
Early growth-stages of Antlers of some Old-World Deer.
A & B. Successive stages observed in Cervus hanglu. C. Cervus canadensis.
D, Rusa aristotelis.
a, the anterior branch or “ brow-tine” ; p, the posterior branch or “ beam ”
b, the rudiment of the bez-tine arising from the posterior branch.
of moment in the method of their development. The antler
starts as an undivided bud. This bud then shows signs of
division into two buds, an anterior and a posterior. These buds
52*
776 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON
gradually, and with nearly equal rapidity, increase in length, the
anterior growing forwards and the posterior backwards. In the
Sambar (Rusa, text-fig. 108, D) and some other species they show
a marked inclination upwards; so that at one stage the antler may
be likened somewhat to a short-stalked Y, and at this or even at a
later stage in deer like the Sambar (/twsa) and others which have
no “ bez ”-tine, the antler may be indifferently described as an
‘‘unbranched beam with a brow-tine” or as a ‘ forked beam” or
as a biramous antler. The anterior and posterior branches some-
times, as in Cervus eldi, grow at approximately the same speed
until the anterior has almost attained its limit; but usually the
growth of the posterior tine is from the first more rapid. However
that may be, the equivalence of the two branches in the early
stages is plain enough ; but afterwards this becomes less and less
evident as the posterior branch continues to lengthen and
develops its accessory tines.
Text-fig. 109.
p
P a B a
DEIN yn ny
aa
HN ay
pine E
D
Five stages (4 to EZ) in the growth of an antler of Rucervus duvaucelli.
a, anterior branch or “brow-tine” ; p, posterior branch or “ beam.”
These facts are shown in the annexed figure (text-fig. 109),
representing five stages in the growth of an antler of a specimen of
the Swamp Deer or Barasingha (Rucervus duvaucelli). These were
ohare,
ANTLER-GROWTH IN THE CERVIDA, ah
sketched on May 13, 16, 22, June 6 and 12. Similar stages may
be observed in other typical deer of the Old World*. In the
Elaphine stags, however, which normally grow a “ bez”-tine,
the biramous stage is early complicated by the appearance of the
bud of this tine. Now this tine has been regarded as a dupli-
cation of the brow-tine; and in Max Weber’st diagram showing
suggested homologies of the tines in certain deer the brow- and
bez-tines are tinted alike, suggesting his adoption of this view.
Nevertheless I believe it to be quite incorrect, for in all cases
where I have watched its origin, the bud of the “bez ”-tine
arises, not from the brow-tine at all, but from the “beam.” It
is, in fact, the basal or proximal tine of the posterior branch of
the antler. This is illustrated in text-fig. 108, A—C, showing the
early stages of the growing antler of the Hangul (Cervus hanglu)
and of the Wapiti (Cervus canadensis).
Antler-Growth i Pere David's Deer (Elaphurus davidianus).
There is no stag whose systematic position has troubled
zoologists so much as Hlaphurus. On the one side are those,
like Dr. Gray, Mr. Cameron, and Mr. Lydekker, who, relying
upon the structure of the antlers of the adult, placed the genus
with the American deer. On the other side are those, like
Sir Victor Brooke, Flower, Max Weber, and others, who, adopting
the skeleton of the foot as a basis, classified it with the typical
Old- World species.
The antlers of this stag have often been figured and described,
and a good idea of their form in the adult may be gathered from
text-fig. 110, C, and text-fig. 111, 7. They typically consist of a
comparatively long basal portion from which two branches arise :
one long, slender, simple or divided, projects backwards parallel,
or nearly so, with the animal’s back; the other stout, erect, or
curved slightly forwards, terminates in a pair of strong tines.
At first sight, these antlers appear to have-no trace of a brow-
tine. This was evidently Sir Victor Brooke’s opinion, and it was
adopted by Mr. Cameron and Mr. Lydekker, who, on the strength
of this belief, boldly claimed that this stag belonged to the same
group as the American deer, also held to have no brow-tine,
despite the resemblances in other respects pointed out by Brooke
between Hlaphurus and the typical Cervide of the Old World.
Prof. Garrod was more cautious, and frankly gave up the attempt
to interpret the antlers of Hlaphurus when he remarked that they
‘‘are at present quite beyond my comprehension.”
This, then, was the state of the case when my researches on
the specialised cutaneous glands of Ruminants { showed that the
* Mr. J. G. Millais (‘Mammals of Great Britain and Ireland,’ iii. plate facing
p. 140, 1906) has published a series of figures of antler-growth in the Fallow Deer
(Dama) illustrating precisely the same phenomenon.
+ Die Saug. p. 667, 1904.
t P. Z.S. 1910, p. 840.
778 MR. R. I, POCOCK ON
absence of interdigital glands on the feet and the smoothness of the
integument between the hoofs in Hlaphurus corroborated Sir Victor
Brooke’s views as to the relationship between this animal and sucn
Old World deer as Rusa, Rucervus, and Cervus, and weakened to
a corresponding degree the claim for affinity between it and the
Text-fig. 110.
Diagram of the Antlers of four genera of Cervide, to illustrate the homologies
established in this paper.
A. Cervus. B. Rusa. C. Elaphurus. D.. Odocoileus.
@, anterior and p, posterior branch. In 4 and B the anterior branch is called the
“brow-time” and the posterior branch the “beam.” B is somewhat inter-
mediate between A and C. They differ collectively from D in having the
anterior branch well developed. In D it is small and concealed behind the
highly developed posterior branch.
Telemetacarpal species, in all the members of which examined by
me, belonging to the genera Mazama, Odocoileus (Dorcelaphus),
Capreolus, Rangifer, and Alee, the skin between the hoofs is
ANTLER-GROWTH IN THE CERVIDA. 779
thickly hairy and, in all but Alce, a large pouch-like inter digital
gland is present at least in the hind foot.
Text-fig. 111.
A
WN aes Pe
—_!ll,
Five stages (4 to #) in the growth of an Antler of an American Deer (Odocoileus
sp. incert.), showing that the “subbasal snag” (a) and the “forked beam ”
(p) were respectively the homologues of the ‘‘ brow-tine ” and the “beam ” of
the typical Old World Deer. Compare B with fig. 108, D.
ANTLER-GROWTH IN THE CERVIDA. 783
point of attachment to the posterior branch being completely
concealed from the external aspect in’ the last three stages *.
In view of these facts, I do not think it can be doubted that
the anterior bud which develops into the ‘“subbasal snag” in
Odocoileus is the homologue of the anterior bud which forms
the brow-tine in Cervus. In that case the “ subbasal snag ” and
the ‘‘brow-tine” are homologous structures passing under different
names, and to state that Odocoilews has no brow-tine is merely
playing with terminology.
If this interpretation of the structure of the antlers in Hlaphurus
and in the species of Odocoilews above referred to be, as I believe,
correct, it shows that these two genera are widely divergent in the
very point upon which relationship between them has been claimed
to exist, and that the likeness, such as it is, between the antlers
of Hlaphurus and of the Mule Deer (O. hemionus), for instance,
which has the so-called forked antlers without a brow-tine or with
the merest vestige of it, is purely a question of parallelism in
development ; that is to say, it has been brought about by growth
and modification of fundamentally different parts of the antler.
In the Mule Deer the anterior branch or brow-tine is to all
intents and purposes suppressed, practically the whole antler
being composed of the posterior branch or “‘ beam,”’ which is
highly developed and heavily tined. In “laphurus, on the
contrary, the principal part of the antler is composed of the
anterior branch or ‘“ brow-tine,” which attains a large size and is
divided into two prongs, while the posterior branch or beam
remains comparatively small and slender and projects straight
backwards as a long often undivided prong.
* In connection with the date of antler-change in this Stag, attention may be
directed to its approximate coincidence with that of the typical elaphine deer of the
Old World; that is to say, the antlers were in the velvet during the summer months
and functional during the autumn and winter. ‘Khey were shed in the early spring
and at the time of writing (July 3) the new antlers are nearly full-sized though stall
in the velvet, exactly as in our Wapiti, Red Deer, Japanese Deer, and other Old
World species. The same is true of a specimen ‘ot Odocoileus americanus. On
the other hand an example of Mazama bricenii which shed in April 1908, and again
in April 1909, did not repeat the process till May 1911. He then carried a pair of
antlers for 25 months; and those that started to grow in May 1911 are still on his
head. Thus Dr. Scharff (Distribution and Origin of Life in America,’ p. 111) is
mistaken in saying that the antler-change in American deer takes place at a quite
different time of year from that of Old World deer. It is well known too that the
time of antler-change at all events in some tropical Old World deer is highly variable
within specific limits. For instance, one example of CO. dwvaucelli in the Gardens
regularly carries his antlers till about the end of May, while another of the same
species has antlers at least half their full size at that time.
’
ie
784 MISS HELEN PIXELL ON
47. Polycheeta from the Pacific Coast of North America.—
Part I. Serputipm, with a Revised Table of Classi-
fication of the Genus Spirorbis. By Hentmn L. M.
PIxELL, B.Sc., F.Z.8., Demonstrator of Zoology and
Reid Fellow, Bedford College, University of London.
[Received May 6, 1912: Read June 4, 1912. ]
(Plates LXXXVIL-LXXXIX.*)
Systematic: InpDEx. Page
ZY TOMASO GODS, Dy Ws egacocnvcaccracauerave ooosbecceess Msi
JEROME FNCU IG, NOs 1s aghcaonanccadeovee wasaeectos pease Usts)
Classitication\ot Spiro7bisee.. seen en oe
JETRO COSMO) SURI My oo agecocgrs avosovecesvonsavecca BE
Spirorbis ambilateralis, sp. N...............00-....... 798
Sb PUCCMIOSUIS; De WS aga coonshtsy so ssousnbonbosacccebacpacesoo TOO
SGOCUCUSy S105: Ue ice, comsddane aan waddle daus boa dom cpeeseetosocboc: me OO)
General Characteristics of the Family Serpulide.
1. Tube calcareous, nearly always attached to rocks or other
substratum for some part of its length.
2. Generally one or more branchiew on dorsal side terminated
by an operculum.
3. Thorax, generally provided with a thoracic membrane,
.
{
representing the fused cirri and having 3-9 (usually 7) ;
segments. i
4. Gland shields in thorax only. i
Genus Serputa Linné (12) 1767, Philippi (21) 1844.
Generic characteristics fT :—
1. Collar sete of bayonet-shape, with spines at base of blade.
2. Operculum funnel-shaped, with numerous radii ending in ;
serrations on margin. '
3. Uncini with only a few large teeth.
1. SeRPULA CoLUMBIANA Johnson (9), 1901. (Pl. LXXXVII.
fig. 1.)
Serpula splendens Bush (8), 1905.
Serpula columbiana Moore (19), 1909.
Specific characteristics :—
1. Anterior abdominal sete with flaring fringed ends, short
and deeply embedded, posteriorly replaced by small fascicles.
of very long stiff spines.
1 ge ee sit
* For explanation of the Plates see p. 805.
+ An attempt is here made to summarise briefly the generic and _ specific
characteristics in every case. Such a procedure has not previously been adopted, so
far as I know, and it will, no doubt, in some cases be necessary at some future time
to modify such characteristics, but in the present confused state of our systematic
knowledge of the Serpulids, this seems to be a course likely to eliminate some of the
difficulties.
IY So WSN 2 LO.
yy
yh IssI IDI,
29>:
Za » mn,
29999
SE By
—s
London Stereoscopic Co. imp.
NORTH AMERICAN SERPULID£.
= 2 S 1S tn iecoev nin,
London Stereoscopic Co. imp.
NORTE AMERICAN | SERP UES 7.
1 Loot). LNA el hp OOD:
°
~-
r
SS
London Stereoscopic Co. imp.
NORTH AMERICAN SERPULEID A.
POLYCH#HTA FROM NORTH AMERICA. 785
2. Uncini generally 6 or 7 teeth, the anterior one being the
largest (figs. 202 & 203 Jonnson, 9).
3. Very large size (fig. 1) with numerous abdominal segments,
30 to 54 branchize and from 80 to 160 serrations on edge
of operculum.
Numerous specimens from Departure Bay, Dodds Narrows,
and two from Puget Sound (Prof. Kincaid’s collection).
Isolated tubes are to be found attached to the undersides of
stones on rocky shores near extreme low-water mark, and small
colonies may be found above this level in rock-pools.
In other places attached to rocks near low-water level the
masses of large white calcareous tubes are very striking—they
are thick and often finely ridged, the lower parts being much
intertwined, the free distal ends often overgrown with Polyzoa,
Spirorbis, ete.
The brilliant red colour on the branchial crown may involve
the whole of the gills and operculum, or these may be colourless
except for the tips, or they may be barred and mottled in a
large variety of ways. The remainder of the body is generally
yellowish.
As regards collar, thoracic membrane, and operculum with its
tubercles, this species agrees very closely with S. vermicularis,
so fully described by St. -Joseph (24. pp. 328-335). Johnson (9)
presumably has made it into a new species on account of its
very much greater size with corresponding greater number of
abdominal seements, branchie and ade eins on operculum,
together with small differences in the sete and uncini. He
cannot, I think, have examined many specimens, for he states
that the functional operculum is on the right side (9. p. 432).
The position of this in the genus Serpula may be right or left as
shown by Zeleny (27. p. 34), but out of 50 specimens that I
have examined 28 had it on the left, 21 on the right, and the
remaining specimen had one on each side. Consequently, when
he says that there are about 100 serrations on the edge of the
operculum, I cannot think that Bush (8) is justified in recording
this as a distinction between this species and S. splendens with
127 to 150 serrations.
Moore (19) gives 140 for the one specimen of S. columbiana in
which he counted the serrations. In my specimens they vary
from about 80 to 160—the number apparently increasing with
age.
Another distinction given by Bush is that there are in
S. columbiana “but 250 abdominal segments in a length of
55 mm.,” whereas Johnson says ‘250 or more” (9. p. 432), and
she gives 313 as the number in a specimen of her so-called
S. splendens, of which she does not state the size, and 190 ina
specimen 35 mm. long. These figures speak for themselves I
think as creating nothing but confusion. In 15 of my specimens
the average number of abdominal segments was 236, including 79
in a specimen 10 mm. long, 142 in a specimen 4] mm. long, and
310 in one 81 mm. long.
786 MISS HELEN PIXELL ON
The third point of difference given by Bush is that S. colwm-
biana has more numerous branchie—54 in each lobe as given
by Johnson—than her S. splendens, for which she records 45 to
50 pairs.
In the specimen of the former species counted by Moore (19)
there were only 38. One small specimen of mine had only 18,
but the general number was from 30 to 50 on each side, one or
two large specimens having as many as 54—the number given
by Johnson. These facts show clearly I think that S. splendens
is a quite unnecessary species and can be included in S. columbiana,
which in turn, as pointed out by Johnson (9. p. 433), may be
identical with WS. jukesti Baird, for which however no satisfactory
description was given.
Numerous large free Selenidia in the trophozoite stage were
found in the alimentary canal of nearly every specimen of
S. columbiana examined.
Genus Crucicrra Benedict (1), 1886.
Generic characteristics :—
1. Collar sete and uncini similar to those of Serpula.
2. Operculum with comparatively few radii forming a scalloped
margin to the funnel and with conspicuous basal pro-
' cesses.
2. CruCcIGERA zYGopHORA Johnson. (Pl. LXXXVII, fig. 2.)
Serpula zygophora Johnson (9), 1901.
Crucigera zygophora Bush (8), 1905.
Specific characteristics :—
1. Branchize about 30 pairs with long filamentous ends to
rachises.
2. Operculum thick, shallow, with about 30 radii aad 3 rounded
processes at its base ; attached by a long pedicle.
One specimen from Puget Sound was 45 mm. long. A smaller
incomplete specimen came from Victoria (fig. 2). Another
specimen was only 7 mm. long and had a much thinner operculum,
but seemed otherwise Similan
3. CRUCIGERA IRREGULARIS Bush (8), 1905. (Pl. LXXXVII.
fig. 3.)
Specific characteristics :—
1. Branchize much coiled and with comparatively short fila-
mentous ends to rachises.
2. Operculum irregular, apex of funnel displaced ventrally and
the posterior eral lager walls deeper and rolled over to
some extent, Not more than two basal processes which
may, however, be bi-lobed and attached by long stout
pedicle (fig. 3).
About 12 specimens from the Channel outside Departure Bay
POLYCHZTA FROM NORTH AMERICA. 787
and one from Dodds Narrows. Depth 15 to 25 fathoms. Tubes
generally solitary, attached to stones, shells, old wood, ete. Only
one specimen is recorded by Bush from Juneau. Tubes much
coiled, with flaring ends and one or two other conspicuous ridges
at intervals indicating the flaring end of a younger tube. Young
tubes seem to develop with a centimetre or so attached more
or less straight along the substratum, then to coil indifferently
to right or left, and only ata much later stage, if at all, to ascend
and form the flaring end,
General colour pale orange, the branchie and operculum
variously mottled and barred with red. Pinne sometimes
golden; ova greenish, Length varies from about 14 mm. to
50 mm. (fig. 3).
Largest diameter of operculum 1:3 to 4:5 mm.; the latter had
32 radii forming a thick scalloped edge. The pedicle was bifid
and contracted at the top just before joining the basal processes
of the operculum (fig. 3). Sete as figured by Bush (8); in the
posterior region of the abdomen the ordinary sete are replaced
by small fascicles of long slender spines.
Genus Apomatus Philippi (21), 1844.
Generic characteristics :—
1. Opereulum globular, terminating a gill retaining its pinne.
2. Some thoracic sete bladed sickles (sete of Apomatus)
(fig. 4c).
3. Terminal dorsal gland present.
4, APOMATUS TIMSII, sp.n. (Pl. LXXXVII. figs. 4 a-4f.)
Specific characteristics :—
1. Collar setz simple tapered blades (fig. 4 6).
2. Branchiz about 40 pairs with pinne nearly to the ends of
rachises.
3. Uncinigerous tori begin on third setigerous segment.
4, Uncini with numerous small teeth, the posterior one larger
with terminal enlargement (fig. 4 f
Abdominal setz more or less sickle-shaped with some long
filiform ones in the last segments.
Or
Eleven specimens from the Channel outside Departure Bay in
about 20 fathoms. This is the first time apparently that the
genus has been recorded from the Pacific Coast of America.
The tubes are solitary, adherent, and sinuous—one was attached
along its whole length to a portion of the Hexactinellid sponge
Aphrocallistes whiteavesianus.
When full-grown about 80 mm. with 150 abdominal segments
(fig. 4a).
The branchial rachises are much coiled and almost colourless,
with pairs of red spots up their outer surfaces and only short.
filiform extremities—the pinne appear green due to the contained
blood. The thorax is more or less orange or red, the thickened
788 MISS HELEN PIXELL ON
ridges bearing the tori being especially deep in colour.
7
"eILASO1xoq
‘ysng sngpbne *g
*ysng sngvbn.1cooopnasd *¢ J J
‘YSN sngojzuapruas *y =)
ee reeeeaeeens cay eurtescrensceeens csc remerecssoercres es SUE TATA e498 IRI[OD
WW 3 ‘O Mmownw °g ‘aqny,
Ul UOLVqnoUT
(£-"Ig suupvorlowmtn “Gy “IeA)
TT wngpwids g -sqTATUSas SNO.LISI40S QOZ-OT USMOPgY ‘sUy JNoYIIM eyes IV][OH }
*AOT SnedDjOIA “YF ‘*SUY INOYALM wJas ABT[OD
rrseeeeecceesescereeeescceesezs4: 198 [BSLOP INOTILM JUSUGIS DIOBIOY} 4SB
“AQVA SNawgIe "Gg SUE YY Yas ARTTOD ( S}UAULSaS MTOVLOY FE
(-eatdsorxepeaeg
|
TYEE
Aa Oy,
"AQUA SNZDIZAOUDI “Gyo teense see soreness SUE TIM 99S AB[TOF) “eJos [estop YT qUOUILS0S OLOBLOY. SVT 3
‘VYAANAD-TAG
“SITAOMITGY SONG) MHL @O NOWLYOMISSVT) £0 aTaV
795
POLYCH®TA FROM NORTH AMERICA,
pda saungypru *g
“AOTT LY OLOW “Gf
WP 'O wunytabun) “gy
49 srunpnbupspond -¢
“YSMEL S2]2UE2S “S
“IN FO wpevusag *
"WW ® ‘O 24a] Y20y *
“TTL 4j0UAq *
RRA RR
“TI $2702409-NU.L09 *
RAR
*ysug s272qn2..va
"IN BO Snaunssagrpou *
“TT sugtosrds *
“AQv iy VO NALID
wm
RR
‘au ‘ds ‘snepau
“ysug sngnhup °
‘T[LMa A SmpypDe *
BIC) $10n)
‘ysng sngnwadsp «
‘WFO tartwad
QR NN
“IN FO Muasuraa) *g
“IN 8 «0 24-4997 “S!
WD ‘0 2apatvdnja yg
WY ‘0 snzvbowbby -g
‘IN ® °O snoruobnznd -g
*u ‘ds ‘snsowsane “¥
SURE? 9D) GPO NS
"mds ‘s279.1agD)LgULD “S
pop onoreuensss (G)) ainynd.1ad¢ {| 4
accron (91 -Sy) mnuo.1ed¢ ' “DO}B.1.10S
ATAS1VOD 4S TB[]OI Jo sapelgy
Sage dle * (g) wnynd.10edg
aie erneo Te uimyno1edQ,
() ei) ul WOIZBqnoUy
ap6 099909 G00 (g) wmynorzadg *poye.tas
|
CIN 80
SURE EDS +(e) aaa FOS LB[TOD JO SopLley pudsonT 3-8)
sees! (a) umpnosedg | ( saa cae
nreeerseees (a) cnpno.1ed¢ “uorjoaford [Ruteyxe SEDGE VD)
oseeteeee (g) ummmnoradg YJLM winpnoiedo jo uoyey, |
: uinynoizad ‘aqny, ‘SJUOULSIS DIVO}
S l ‘ Le 9s.ivoo URIS eatiels see FO SOPRIA ( ur uoeqnouy | r "eIIdsOe T
*(¢) winpnoiedg uorqaload [vu1dzxe | ;
NOL uLNpud.ted RB
ves STORIES OU ae ce aes ae a iT) J
RUNDOND0O DOobdO DOD NDU-0EDeD b00 000 400 mete peteretstafeholslencietMelsefairtataloye 50 wanno.10dQ ut moyeqnouy “yojou ro11aysod
Man SeRipor ase oes bboc tea cngesptre sun ase aannAtrscocas GG ae ERO ASOVMAGES lass
equy, UL UoryEqnouy ) saperq eyes 1e[[OD | “TY WISINIS
odu ang oucso0 (2) winjnd.1edg { Teo],
sree (9) tmNaed, bosses page weopoary snues-qns) wmnno1ed¢ Ur woyeqnouy
Hoesen (22) tmmosodg " ‘sapRyq
[dts 249s 1eT[O{)
Dee eee tenses (@) wmyno.1ed¢
veers (9) wanqnosadg so (TT 99 “Cy ppjayoUDUOoY SNUES-qns) 9qny,
= J
Sravatarereeletelia’e atsis\sisfelelatvinks!scateterolelelstclsipiatelststs]slicrele Coe tee cee cvcetveeecee UOTeY qnoyyEM unno1ed¢Q a) |
perros eeeeeeereeecreers Ory AIOA OYV[A [BULUIIE} SaATSsBUA WIN[NoOLedo Jo NOTLy, | |
serene eee ccneuesecerncssseccorees “(a p) yoy AtaA turloug \ wmynoredo jo uojey, ‘sug *SJUAULSas DIOVIOYY FE
5 | YIM Vyas 1vyop ( ‘vardsose[eieg
vee (g) un[MoIedQ “SU YJIM Bos AV[[OO []VUIG
| ‘JOUUN, [Buran
“eo (Tp By) umpnaiedg “suy \.-19} JO worjpesuopord
s B® winnd19do Jo Wo[Ry,
eos (g) veanymenessigy | WEES AS IO aS.ie'] caine My
“SJUOUISAS OLOVAON]} F
pros sesvenseseesvereuseeseeesssees ONOd-pOOIG [BLO}VI[-OSOp B UT pozeqnout sokiquigg “sou ‘ectTdsoepoyorg J
796 MISS HELEN PIXELL ON
Specific characteristics :—
1. Last thoracic segment on the right has no dorsal sete.
2. Collar sete with fin-like expansions at base of deeply serrated
blades.
3. Some seta of third segment bladed sickles.
4, Embryos incubated in the tube.
This species was quite common on stones and rocks from the
Departure Bay region and from Victoria.
The tubes vary a good deal but are always translucent, with
the whorls piled on one another. The whole tube measures
about 2°5 mm. in diameter and the aperture about 1 mm. across.
There are various markings on the exterior. Sometimes a
ridge along the median line ends in a sharp projection above
the aperture—in the grooves on either side of this there may
or may not be scalariform markings. Young specimens have
shells as figured for this species by Levinsen (10. fig. 11), older
ones were ridged more like Sp. cancellatus (10. fig. 18). The living
animals were bright pink in colour. Gills 7, each with six pairs
of long opposite pinne, opercular plate a shallow funnel. About
20 abdominal segments.
Sub-genus Dextospira (Caullery & Mesnil, 1897).
Characteristics :—
1. Tubes dextral.
2. Thorax with 3 setigerous segments.
8. Sprroreis sprrintuM Linné, 1767. (Pl LUXXXVIII.
figs, 8a—8c.)
Serpula spirillum Linné (12), 1767; Fabricius (7), 1780.
Spirorbis spirillum Malmgren (14), 1867; Levinsen (10),
1883; Caullery & Mesnil (5), 1897; Moore (17), 1902;
Bush (3), 1905.
Spirorbis lucidus Montagu (16), 1803; Mérch (20), 1863 ;
Malmgren (14), 1867.
Circeis armoricana Saint-Joseph (24), 1894.
Spirorbis borealis Fewkes (8), 1885.
Specific characteristics :—
1. Collar sete geniculate (fig. 8 ¢).
2. Operculum without brood-pouch.
3. Concave plate of operculum has a slight projection (talon)
on under side.
Two varieties of this species were fairly common in the Departure
Bay region and at Victoria, growing on calcareous polyzoa,
seaweeds, etc. . The discoid form grows only on smooth surfaces,
Laminarian thalli being often extensively covered with specimens.
These were very flat, regularly coiled tubes—the spiral with
14 to 3 coils measuring 5 to 2mm. in diameter (fig. 8a). The
POLYCH ETA FROM NORTH AMERICA, 197
ascending variety in some localities is much more common than
the discoid one, and it grows toa much larger size (fig. 8 6), often
attaining a height of 5 mm. It was generally found with its
lower coils overgrown with an orange Bryozoan growing on
Chetopterus tubes.
The living animal had a reddish colour, witha colourless trans-
parent operculum. A string of pink ova extended along the tube
beyond the posterior end of the body in some specimens. There
were 3 thoracic and from 12 to 20 abdominal segments.
The collar sete attain a length of °27 mm., much larger than
those figured by Caullery & Mesnil (5. fig. 46), they resemble
more closely in shape those given for S. armoricanus (5. fig. 5 6).
The differences between these two species were pointed out
by Caullery & Mesnil (5. p. 199) to be quite unimportant. All
that they could summarise were that Sp. armoricanus (Circeis
armoricanus St.-Joseph (24. p. 350)) was slightly larger, had more
abdominal segments (16-20) and a reduced talon to the operculum.
They record having seen intermediate forms themselves, and the
above observations as to variation in size, the number of abdom-
inal segments, and the collar setz consequently confirm their
opinion that Sp. armoricanus should be considered as a variety
only of Sp. spirillum.
9. SprrorBIs PUSILLOIDES Bush (3). (Pl. LX XXVIII. figs. 9a,
. ; 9 b.
S. pusillus Caullery & Mesnil (5), 1897. )
Mera pusilla St.-Joseph (24), 1894.
Non S. pusillus Rathke (22 a), 1836.
Specific characteristics :—
1. Collar setze of a more or less geniculate form (fig. 9 @).
2. Embryos incubated in operculum.
3. Sete of 3rd thoracic segment sickle-shaped.
4. Hepatic pigment reddish brown.
On stones from Taylor’s Bay, Gabriole Island. This animal
agrees in all important points with the full description by
St.-Joseph (24. p. 351) for Mera pusilla. The collar sete are a
little more distinctly angulated at the base of the blade (fig. 9 a),
but they have not the typical geniculate form described by
Caullery & Mesnil (5. p. 202). They are much shorter than
the sete of the second segment and are decidedly hooked. The
extent to which the sete are hooked has been pointed out by
St.-Joseph to be reduced by preservation (24. p. 338), so that
this does not seem to be a very important point.
The opercular brood-pouch is somewhat cylindrical and bounded
proximally and distally by caleareous plates, the talon is reduced
to a small quadrangular projection.
The abdomen has eight segments, with large, more or less
sickle-shaped sete (fig. 9b) and an asetigerous anal segment.
798 MISS HELEN PIXELL ON
Sub-genus PRoTOLMOSPIRA, Nov.
1. Tube sinistral.
2. Four complete setigerous segments to thorax.
10. SpPrRoRBIS AMBILATERALIS, sp. Nn. (Ely lu Xexexc yeaa
figs. 10 a-10e.)
Specific characteristics :—
1, Collar seta very large, conspicuously serrated blades with
fin-like expansion at base (fig. 10 a).
2. Operculum without brood-pouch.
3. Talon of operculum with large hook-like process (fig. 10 6).
4. Some sete of 3rd segment have fringed ends (fig. 10).
5. Some setze of 4th segment ordinary bladed sickles.
6. Abdominal sete brush-like (fig. 10).
7. Dorso-lateral brood-pouch.
Several specimens on the inner sides of shells of Balanus
nubilus from Dodds Narrows, 15-25 fathoms. ‘Tubes forming
translucent sinistral spirals measuring 3 to 4mm. across. ‘The
surface is distinctly corrugated outside, highly polished inside ;
the aperture measures 1 mm. in diameter.
Branchie 12—6 on the right, and the operculum with 5
others on the left. The pinne extend upwards and reach the
same height as the rachises. The opercular plate (fig. 106)
is very like that of S. cornu-arietis Marion & Bobretzky (15).
From close to the point of origin of the pedicle arises a wide tube
which passes across the dorsal surface beneath the left lateral
lobe of the collar, and enlarges into the thin-walled brood-sae
which lies along the dorso-lateral surface on the right side. This
structure has never, so far as [ am aware, been described before:
it is figured and more fully described for S. racemosus, in which
species it was first seen.
Collar wide and entire ; the collar sets rather more than | mm.
in length (fig. 10a). Sete of 2nd segment very numerous, all
with simple blades; these appear again in the 3rd fascicle, and
with them some shorter bladed setze with their extremities more
or less curved and fringed (fig. 10¢). The sets of the 4th thoracic
segment are few in number; on the convex side of one specimen
there were three bladed sickles (fig. 10d) and three with plain
blades. The uncigerous tori on the 4th segment are also smaller
than on the two preceding, especially on the right (convex) side.
The thoracic uncini are about 90 ~ long and have 20-25 teeth.
Those on the abdomen are only 25 y in length. About 50 of
the latter make up each of the tori which are very distinct on
the 18-20 abdominal segments: they begin quite close to the
posterior end of the thorax—the anterior asetigerous region of
the abdomen being very short.
The collar sete in this form seem to have been specially
POLYCH ETA FROM NORTH AMERICA. 799
developed, for according to Caullery & Mesnil (5) the possession
of blade and fin is not a primitive characteristic, and they are
also very large; possibly they are specially developed in correla-
tion with its habitat in rapids where the tide runs from 7—9 knots
an hour. The presence of the specially developed brood-pouch
might perhaps receive a similar explanation.
Sub-genus PARALAOSPIRA.
1. Tubes sinistral.
2. Thorax with 33 setigerous segments.
11. SprrorBis RACEMOSUS, sp. n. (Pl. LX X XIX. fig. 11.)
Specific characteristics :—
1. Collar sete with fin-like expansion at base of very coarsely
serrated blade (fig. 11 a).
2. Operculum with massive talon having lateral wings and a
hook on ventral surface (fig. 11 6).
3. Thin-walled dorsal or lateral brood-pouch attached to the
thorax at the base of the operculum (fig. 11d).
4. Some setz of 3rd fascicle bladed sickles (fig. 11 ¢).
A few large specimens from San Juan Island on barnacle-
shells overgrown with calcareous sponge; smaller ones from
Channel outside Departure Bay. Depth in both places 15 to
25 fathoms.
The largest specimen measures 5 mm. across the spiral; the
tube is corrugated and generally rather loosely coiled, leaving a
central hole.
Branchie 13—6 functional ones on each side; rachises have
short tapered extremities without pinne; operculum not unlike
that of S. ambilateralis, but the talon rather more massive and
its outer concavity almost hemispherical and filled with débris.
The collar sete are very large (fig. lla); the 2nd fascicle
consists of plain-bladed sete, and the 3rd contain some fringed
sickles as well. There is a distinct third uncinigerous torus on
the left side (fig. 11d); the uncini have the usual shape.
There are 21 well-marked abdominal segments, each with three
or four brush-like sete and along asetigerous anal segment. The
brood-pouch with its distinct wide stalk seems to be peculiar to
this and the last described species of Spirorbis: it does not appar-
ently replace a gill, for the caleareous operculum is developed as
usual on the 2nd to the left. The sac has a very thin wall, the
- large ova causing marked protuberances on its surface, the whole
somewhat resembling a bunch of grapes (fig. 11d).
Sub-genus Lospira.
1. Tube sinistral.
2. Thorax with 3 setigerous segments,
800 MISS HELEN PIXELL ON
12. SprrorBis AsPERATUS Bush (8), 1905; Sitka. (Pl. LXXXIX,
fig. 12.)
Specific characteristics :—
1. Collar sete with simple blades.
2. Operculum without brood-pouch.
3. Calcareous plate of operculum thin, with large lateral wings
on its talon.
4, Some sete of 3rd fascicle short fringed sickles (fig. 12),
others with long narrow blades.
On an old Serpulid tube inhabited by a hermit crab. One
specimen only. The opaque sinistral tube shows conspicuous
growth-lines, and the whorls are somewhat piled on one another.
There are 12 or 13 reddish gills nearly hidden by the high
collar, above which the operculum projects for some distance.
The alimentary canal was greenish and the ova along the dorsal
surface salmon-pink. The abdomen consisted of about 20
segments.
13. Sprrorprs vatipus Verrill (26), 1874. (Pl. LX X XIX. fig. 13.)
S. verruca Levinsen (10), 1883, figs.+Caullery & Mesnil
(5), 1897 ; Moore (17), 1902.
S. validus Bush (8), 1905.
Specific characteristics :—
1. All thoracie sete with long, finely serrated, narrow blades
(fig. 13).
2. Operculum with brood-pouch.
3. Opercular plate (Bush (3), pl. xliv. figs. 11-14).
4. Branchie 13.
On old shells of Balanus nubilus from Dodds Narrows, 15 to
28 fathoms.
The tubes were smooth, sinistral, and opaque, measuring 3 mm.
in diameter. The operculum was colourless and transparent,
with a large sac-like brood-pouch which was, however, empty in
specimens collected on September Ist. The gills and thorax were
of a bright orange-red colour, the rachises being thick with a double
row of small pinne extending inwards at right angles. Abdomen
with 25 segments having a few sete, some being somewhat
geniculate, others small hooks (Bush, pl. xxxvu. figs. 5 & 6).
14, SprrorBis MEDIUS, sp.n. (PI. LXXXIX. figs. 14 a-14e.)
Specific characteristics :—
1. Some collar setze with shallow posterior notch (fig. 14 a).
2. Operculum without brood-pouch.
3. Caleareous plate of operculum very large and of character-
istic shape (figs. 14c & d).
4, Some setee of 3rd segment serrated bladed sickles (fig. 14 e).
From Channel just outside Departure Bay. Large flat tubes
POLYCHATA FROM NORTH AMERICA, 801
thick and opaque, slightly roughened, but without definite growth-
lines. A slight median ridge and sometimes one on either side ;
the aperture has, however, an entire margin and measures 2 mm.
ACLOSS.
The animal is of a uniform brick-red colour, and its total
length is 455 mm; there are 14 branchiw—7 being joined at
their bases and situated on the right side; the other 6 func-
tional ones are joined with the operculum on the left. Hach
rachis has a thin membranous projecting flap which wraps round
the outside of the next, and thus gives rise to a series of imbri-
eating semilunar membranes just inside the base of the collar.
The total height of the gills is 1 mm. There is a very wide
thoracic membrane on the right side which almost envelops the
whole animal. The calcareous plate of the operculum is 1°5 mm.
along its long axis; the outer side is concave and generally
covered with sand; the talon projects obliquely inwards and has
large wing-like expansions at the sides (figs. 14c & d). The
collar setze (fig. 14 a) appear to be in an intermediate stage between
plain bladed form and that with a distinct fin-like expansion at
the base of the blade—in one specimen I could find none of these,
only forms with the ordinary blades. In the 2nd segment there
were numerous setz of the normal kind, and the 8rd fascicle was
made up of bladed sickles (fig. 14¢) and ordinary bladed sete.
The two tori in the thorax consisted of uncini of the ordinary
shape with about 20 teeth. In the abdomen were counted 20 to
25 segments, and the setz were of the ordinary geniculate type.
15. SPIRORBIS LANGERHANSI Caullery & Mesnil (5), 1897, and
Bush (3), 1905, from Panama. (Pl. LXXXIX. fig. 15.)
Specific characteristics :—
1. Collar set# with fin-lke expansion at base of coarsely
serrated blade (fig. 15).
2. Embryos incubated in operculum.
3. Operculum of characteristic shape (5. fig. 22).
On tubes of Serpula columbiana from Departure Bay. Tubes
small, marked with lines and ridges.
The structure of the animals agrees with the description given
by Cauliery & Mesnil (5. p. 217). They are 1-2 mm. long,
the abdomen being broad, with a long asetigerous region followed
by 9 short setigerous segments.
16. SprrorBis MORcHI Levinsen (10), 1883 (Greenland); Caullery
& Mesnil (5), 1897; Bush (8), 1905. (Pl. LXXXIX.
figs. 16 a-16 d.)
Specific characteristics :—
1. Collar sete about 12, with fin-like expansion at base of
coarsely serrated blade (fig. 16 a).
2. Embryos incubated in operculum (fig. 16 6),
3. Branchie 8.
802 MISS HELEN PIXELL ON
Numerous specimens on tubes of Serpula columbiana from
Departure Bay. The opaque tubes are pressed together with
their ends standing erect, their bases being overgrown with an
encrusting sponge ; the surfaces are free from regular markings, the
apertures being circular and measuring about ] mm. in diameter.
The animals vary in colour, some being almost colourless, but
were generally some shade of red or brown.
The sete of the 2nd and 3rd thoracic segments have long, very
narrow, delicately serrated blades (fig. 16c). A few of the 3rd
are shorter, with small posterior blades; these probably represent
straightened sickles (fig. 16d).
There is a deep collar and a wide thoracic membrane on the
right side only—this traverses the ventral surface obliquely
towards the end of the thorax and covers over several segments
of the abdomen. ‘The gill rachises are thick and have long
pinne, the seven normal respiratory ones are rather taller than
the one bearing the operculum. The latter is protected at
its extremity by a convex calcareous cap which extends nearly to
the base of the brood-pouch on the ventral side. The top is
quite opaque and slightly bilobed. Fifteen or more large reddish
ova were contained. Abdominal segments 20-29 with normal
geniculate sete.
17. SPIRoRBIS VARIABILIS Bush (3), 1905; Sitka.
Specific characteristics :—
1. Collar sete coarsely serrated blades with posterior fins.
2. Operculum without brood-pouch.
3. Talon of operculum without projections.
On stones and tubes of Serpula columbiana from Departure
Bay and neighbourhood. Thick tubes about 1 mm. across with
the outer whorl spreading over the others to some extent ; surface
markings were not very distinct.
General colour brick-red, with cerise ova along the dorsal
surface.
Branchiew 8 (including operculum), are nearly hidden by the
high collar. The thoracic membrane on the right side is very much
developed. The opercular plate had a marked concavity on its
outer side, and a small almost central talon projecting inwards.
The sets agree with those described by Bush (3). The abdominal
segments varied a great deal in number, from 15 to 28.
18. SprroRBIS QUADRANGULARIS Stimpson (25), 1853.
Spirorbis quadrangularis Morch (20), 1863, and Bush (8),
1905.
Spirorbis fabricii Malmgren (14), 1867.
Spirorbis carinatus Levinsen (10), 1883 + (11), 1886 +
Montagu (16), 1803.
Spirorbis afinis Levinsen (10), 1883.
Spirorbis granulatus Moore (17), 1902 + (?) Caullery &
Mesnil (5), 1897,
POLYCH ETA FROM NORTH AMERICA. 803
Specific characteristics :—
1. Collar sete finely striated blades with basal fin.
2. Operculum with large brood-pouch.
3. Convex caleareous cap with long cylindrical projection
(figs. 14, 15, pl. xliii., Bush (3) 1905).
Victoria ; two specimens only obtained.
Tubes measure 2 and 3 mm. across respectively ; each has a
very conspicuous median ridge and two lateral ones, the outer
one being at the top of the perpendicular outer wall. The stria-
tions on the blades of the collar sete could hardly be distinguished
at all. Some sets in the third fascicle were serrated, bladed
sickles. The collar and thoracic membrane were well developed
on the right side, and there was a long asetigerous region
following the thorax. There were 12 abdominal segments with
geniculate sete.
Most of the specimens described in this paper were obtained
during a stay at the Marine Biological Station, Departure Bay,
Vancouver Island, in the summer of 1911. Mr. F. A. Potts
kindly collected those from Puget Sound and some others: I
should like to take this opportunity of thanking him, also the
Rev. G. W. Taylor, F.R.S8.C., Curator of the Marine Laboratory,
Departure Bay, for his kindness and help with regard to dredging
arrangements, and Dr. Marett Tims for his advice and assistance
throughout.
REFERENCES.
1. Benepict, J. E.—Description of ten species and one new
genus of Annelids from the dredgings of the U.S. Fish
Commission Steamer ‘ Albatross.’ Proc. U.S. Nat. Museum,
ix. p. 547, pls. xx-xxv. Washington, 1886.
2. Busu, K. J.—On Spirorbis from Japan (see under Moore
(18)).
3. Busu, K. J.—Sabellide and Serpulide. Harriman Alaska
Expedition, vol. xu. 1905.
4, Busy, K. J.—Description of new Serpulids from Bermuda,
with notes on known forms from adjacent regions. Proc.
Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. lxii. 1910.
5. Cauntery, M., et Musniz, F.—Etudes sur la morphologie
comparée et la phylogénie des espéces chez les Spirorbis.
Bull. Sci. France et Belgique, xxx. pp. 185-233. Paris,
1897.
6. Dauprin, F. M.—Recueil de mémoires et de notes sur les
espéces inédites ou peu connues de Mellusques, Vers et:
Zoophytes, Paris, 1800, p. 38. Nouveau genre de Ver a
tube calcaire, voisin des Serpules et des Dentales. Bull.
Sci. Soc. Philom., Paris, ii. p. 145, 1800.
7. Fasrictus, O.— Fauna Greenlandica, Copenhagen and
Leipzig, 1780,
804
10.
late
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
MISS NWELEN PIXELL ON
. Fewxes, J. W. On the Larval form of Spirorbis borealis.
Am. Naturalist, xix. p. 247. Philadelphia, 1885.
. Jounson, H. P.—Polycheta of the Puget Sound Region.
Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. xxix. pp. 381-437. 1901.
Levinsen, G. M. R.—Systematisk-geografisk Oversigt over
de Nordiske Annulata, Gephyrea, Chetognathi, og Balano-
glossi. Vidensk. Medd. Natur. 4, 1882-3, pp. 92-350.
Copenhagen, 1883.
Levinsen, G. M. R.—Kara-Havets Ledorme (Annulata).
Dijmphna-Togtets Zoologisk-botaniske Udbytte, pp. 289—
303. Copenhagen, 1886.
Linné, C. von.—Systema Nature, xir. 1767.
McIntosu, W. C.—Report on the Polycheta. ‘ Challenger’
Reports, xii. London, 1885.
Matmeren, A. J.—Annulata Polycheta. Gfvers. Vet.-Akad.
Forh. pp. 1-127. Stockholm, 1867.
Marton, A. F., et Bosprerzky, N.—Annélides du golfe de
Marseille. Ann. Sci. nat. (6) 11. pp. 1-106. Paris, 1875.
Montacu, G.—Testacea Britannica. 1803.
Moors, J. P.—Descriptions of some new Polynoide, with a
list of other Polycheta from North Greenland Waters.
Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Philadelphia, liv. 1902.
Moors, J. P.—Sabellide and Serpulide from Japan, with an
appendix on Spirorbis by K. J. Bush. Proc. Acad. Nat.
Se. Philadelphia, lvi. p. 157. 1904.
Moors, J. P.—Polychetous Annelids from Monterey Bay
and San Diego, California. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Philad.
Ixi. p. 230. 11909.
Morcu, A. L.—Revisio critica Serpulidarum et Bidrag til
Rorormenes Naturhistorie. Naturhist. Tidsskrift, 1.
pp. 347-470. Copenhagen, 1863.
Puriiprr, A.—On the genus Serpula, enumeration of Medi-
terranean species. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. xiv. p. 153.
London, 1844.
QuATREFAGES, De.— Histoire naturelle des Annelés, Tome il.
p. 488. (Suites 4 Buffon, 1865.)
22a. Rarake, H.—Zur Fauna der Krym. Mém. Acad. Imp.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Sci. St. Pétersbourg, iii. pp. 407-429. 1836.
Risso, A.—Histoire naturelle des principales productions
de Europe méridionale, iv. Paris, 1826.
Sarnt-JoserH, Baron de.—Les Annélides polychétes des cdtes
de Dinard. Ann. Sci. nat.(7) xvii. pp. 1-395. Paris, 1894.
Stimpson, W.—Synopsis of the Marine Invertebrata of Grand
Manan. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, vi.
pp. 29-36. Washington, 1553.
Verritt, A. E.—Explorations of Caseo Bay by the U.S. Fish
Commission in 1873. Proc. American Assoc. Ady. Sci.
pp- 340-395. 1874.
ZeveNy, C.—Experiments on the control of asymmetry in
the development of the Serpulid Hydroides dianthus.
Journ. Morph. vol. xxii, No. 4. Philadelphia, 1911.
es a
POLYCHATA FROM NORTH AMERICA. 805
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.
Prats LXXXVII.
Fig. 1. Serpula columbiana from left side, X 3.
Fig. 2. Crucigera zygophora, anterior end from right side, X 2.
Fig. 3. Crucigera irreguluris, whole animal from right side, X 2.
Fig. 4. Apomatus timsii. 4a, whole animal from the right side, X 3, d.g., dorsal
terminal gland; 46, collar seta, X 300; 4:c, bladed sickle-shaped seta
from thorax, X 300; 4d, crumpled anterior abdominal seta, X 300;
4 e, short posterior abdominal, seta X 300; 4.f, thoracic uncinus, X 300.
Fig. 5. Protula pacifica. 65a, ventral view, X $; 56, thoracic seta, X 300;
5c, anterior abdominal seta, embedded up to the dotted line, X 200;
5d, short posterior abdominal seta, X 300; 5e, tip of long posterior
abdominal seta, X 300; 5, abdominal uncinus, X 300.
Pratr LXXXVIII.
Fig. 6. Chitinopoma greenlandica. 6a, dorso-lateral view, X 2; 66, collar seta,
x 460; 6c, abdominal seta, X 460; 6d, transverse section through
pedicle of operculum, v.s. stem of vesicle, X 55; 6e, transverse section
through operculum showing vesicle (v) suspended in a loose connective
tissue, X 48.
Fig. 7. Spirorbis vitreus, collar seta, X 220.
Fig. 8. Spirorbis spirillum. 8a, tube of discoid variety, X 48; 8b, tube of
ascending variety, X 10; 8c, collar seta, X 200.
Fig. 9. Spirorbis pusilloides. 9a, collar seta, X 460; 9b, large abdominal seta,
x 460.
Fig. 10. Spirorbis ambilateralis. 10a, collar seta, X 220; 106, calcareous plate
of operculum, lateral view, X 48; 10c, seta from 3rd thoracic segment,
showing fringed sickle-shaped extremity; 10d, ordinary bladed sickle,
from 4th segment (twisted end); 10¢, brush-like abdominal seta. c-e,
X< 220.
Prats LXXXIX.
Fig. 11. Spirorbis racemosus, sp. u. 11a, collar seta, X 220; 11 6, calcareous plate
of operculum, X 48; 1c, seta from 3rd thoracic segment, X 460;
11d, dorsal view of whole animal showing stalkéd brood-pouch, x 12.
Fig. 12. Spirorbis asperatus, seta from 3rd thoracic fascicle, X 460.
Fie. 13. Spirorbis validus, collar seta, X 460.
Fig. 14. Spirorbis medius, sp. nu. 14a, collar seta showing shallow posterior
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
notch, X 460. 144, ordinary capillary seta from Ist fascicle, X 460.
14c¢, calcareous plate of operculum, dorsal view, showing talon and
lateral wings, X 16. 14d, latero-ventral view of opercular plate,
showing flat talon with lateral wing-like projections, X 16. 14, ser-
rated bladed sickle, x 460.
. Spirorbis langerhansi, collar seta, X 460.
. Spirorbis mérchi. 16a, collar seta, X 220. 166, operculum containing
ova, lateral view, X 48. 16c, narrow seta of 2nd and 3rd fascicles,
< 220. 16d, seta from 3rd fascicle, X 220.
Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1912, No. LIV. 54
806 MR. D. SETH-SMITH ON A RARE LORY.
EXHIBITIONS AND NOTICES.
May 21, 1912.
Sir Epmunp G. Loprr, Bt., Vice-President,
in the Chair.
The Secrerary read the following report on the additions
made to the Society’s Menagerie during the month of April
1912 :—
The number of registered additions to the Society’s Menagerie
during the month of April last was 291. Of these 165 were
acquired by presentation, 61 by purchase, 17 were received on
deposit, 8 in exchange, and 40 were born in the Gardens.
The number of departures during the same period, by deaths
and removals, was 189.
Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :—
1 Riippell’s Guereza (Colobus abyssinicus occidentalis) 3, from
the Southern Cameroons, deposited on April 29th.
1 Black Jaguar (Felis onca) 9, from Para, purchased on
April 12th.
1 Capped Langur (Semnopithecus pileatus), 2 Klands (Tauro-
tragus oryx), 1 Common Camel (Camelus dromedarius), and
1 Ursine Tree-Kangaroo (Dendrolagus ursinus), born in the
Menagerie.
A collection of birds from Columbia, presented by W. K.
Pomeroy, Esq., F.Z.S., on April 6th, containing amongst others,
2 Purple Jays (Cyanocoraa affinis), new to the Collection ; 1 Harpy
Eagle (Thrasaétus harpyia); 2 Severe Macaws (Ara severa); and
2 Golden Hangnests (Icterus xanthornus).
2 Limmergeiers (Gypaétus barbatus), from Russian Turkestan,
purchased on April 19th.
1 large Reticulated Python (Python reticulatus), from the East
Indies, presented by Rowland Ward, Esq., F.Z.8., on April 19th.
Mr. A. Buayney Percivat, F.Z.S., exhibited a number of
photographs and lantern-slides of Game Animals from British
East Africa, including a fine series of the Reticulated Giraffe.
Mr. D. Sern-Surrn, F.Z.8., Curator of Birds, exhibited two
living specimens of a rare Lory, Calliptilus solitarius, from Fiji,
and remarked that Dr. Philip H. Bahr had recently brought
home two specimens which had died. The specimens exhibited
were from a collection of eight brought home alive by Mr. Rood
Tarte, of Taviuni Island, one of the Fijian group, where this very
beautiful species was still abundant, its numbers having been
very considerably reduced in the other islands by the introduced
ON THE PRESERVATION OF OUR NATIVE FAUNA. 807
mongoose. The exhibitor referred to a recent note on the species
by Dr. Bahr in ‘ The Ibis’ for April 1912, p. 293.
Mr. G. A. Boutenesr, F.R.S., F.Z.S., read a paper entitled
“Second Contribution to our Knowledge of the Varieties of the
Wall-Lizard.” This paper was a continuation of one published
in the Society’s ‘ Transactions’ in 1905, and dealt chiefly with the
variations of Lacerta muralis in South-Kastern Europe and South-
Western Asia. It also contained a supplement to the first part,
thus completing an account of the varieties, of which about thirty
were regarded as more or less definable, the author endeavouring
to show the inconstancy of the characters adduced by some her-
petologists in assigning specific rank to a number of these forms,
connected by many gradations. Mr. Boulenger hoped to support
his statements by a number of photographic figures of specimens
selected out of the enormous material which had passed through
his hands in the course of his study of this polymorphic and widely
distributed lizard.
This paper will be published in the ‘Transactions’ in due
course.
June 4, 1912.
K. G. B. Meapr-Watpo, Esq., Vice-President,
in the Chair.
Mr. E. G. Boutenerr, Curator of Reptiles, exhibited a clay-
ball containing a cocoon of the African Lung-fish (Protopterus
annectens) presented to the Society by Capt. J. A. M. Vipan, F.Z.S.
He briefly alluded to the habits of the fish and the formation of
the cocoon, and gave an account of the method to be employed in
order to release the fish.
The Preservation of the Native Fauna of Great Britain.
Mr. E. G. B. Meape-Watpo, Vice-President of the Society,
introduced a discussion on the Preservation of our Native Fauna,
in which Mr. A. Heneage Cocks, Dr. F. G. Dawtrey Drewitt, and
Mr. Stewart Blakeney (who sent a written contribution) joined.
The necessity of creating public opinion on the matter was urged.
It was agreed that the laws with regard to birds were sufficient,
if administered strictly. With regard to mammals, it was the
opinion of those present that the use of steel traps, instead of
snares, for catching rabbits was chiefly responsible for the ex-
termination of wild cats, martens, and polecats in many parts of
the country, and ought to be suppressed.
54%
808 DR. HANS GADOW ON OVARIES
PAPERS.
48. The One-sided Reduction of the Ovaries and Ovidacts in
the Amniota, with Remarks on Mammalian Evolution.
By Hans Gapow, M.A., Ph.Ds Hass Eas:
[Received May 31, 1912: Read June 4, 1912.]
INDEX.
Anatomical Structure and Development............... 803
Sanguine morphologists reckon that it takes about ten years
for their discoveries to find their way into a text-book. It
takes a generation to evadicate erroneous statements, especially
generalisations, out of such books, since most of them are
repeated from others without consultation of the immense host
of original papers. And it is apparently hopeless to expect the
enthusiast or amateur to appreciate the difference between a
generalising text-book of comparative anatomy and a zootomical
account. 1t means progress for a branch of science if we can
inscribe upon its statute-book a few lines of true generalisation,
which, if there be no hedging, require no longer any concrete
examples to be mentioned. If only partial generalisations are
possible, of course the exceptions are to be recorded and every
new case is welcome, until their accumulation in turn permits of
being summarised. Then let there be drawn a line, and let the
discoverer of further cases keep his peace unless he has something
new to say.
The condition of the bird’s ovaries and oviducts is a case in
point. The main facts have by now become ancient history and
general knowledge to the zoologist, so ancient that the original
workers have been forgotten, as much as the name of the
originator of the term morphology.
That the ovaries and ducts of birds are one-sided was probably
known since time immemorial. Perrault * described and figured
them in the Ostrich without further comment. In the year 1810
Wolf mentioned that he had usually found two ovaries in the
Sparrow-hawk, a fact duly incorporated by Tiedemann 7 in his
excellent work, which reveals him as a zoologist far ahead of his
time. Next, Spangenberg? figured the right ovary ina Duck.
Barkow § described the occurrence of right-sided rudiments of
the female generative apparatus in various other birds. Emmert ||
observed equally large right and left ovaries in the Sparrow-
* PpRRAvULT: Mémoires pour servir 4 histoire naturelle. Amsterdam, 1736.
+ TrmpEMANN: Anatomie und Naturgeschichte der Vogel. 1810.
{ SpANGENBERG: Disquisitiones circa partes genitales feemineas Avium. Got-
tinge, 1813, 4to.
§ Barkow: Von der Kloake verschiedener Vogel. Meckel’s Archiv f. Anat. u.
Phys., 1829.
|| Emuert: Reil u. Authenrict’s Archiv.
AND OVIDUCTS IN THE AMNIOTA. 809
hawk and some other Accipitres. When Nitzsch made his
anatomical contributions to Naumann’s ‘ Naturgeschichte’ he
knew already of quite a number of cases of double ovaries.
R. Wagner* added to them in his Lehrbuch, and still more in his
Beitriige. He described the cases of double ovaries accompanied
by double ducts; he knew that vestigial ducts are much rarer
than ovaries, and was well aware of the fact that even in Accipitres
with double ovaries there may be no traces of a second duct, ete.
Stannius f added further cases in his Lehrbuch. It was, how-
ever, mainly owing to Wagner's lists that Dumeéril could give a
general summary in Cuvier’s posthumous edition of his ‘ Anatomie
comparée,’ published in 1836. Owen also felt justified in
summarising without referring any more to special cases. On
p. 247 of his work he says:—‘‘'The symmetry [of the ovaria] is
soon disturbed by concentration of development in the left
ovarium, the right one remaining stationary, and ultimately, in
most birds, disappearing.” On p. 249: *‘ Subsequently the left
oviduct alone proceeds to grow; the right is stationary, or
shrivels ; occasionally it may be discovered as a rudiment in the
mature bird, but usually all trace of it has disappeared.”
Still further instances of abnormalities have been described
and even figured without adding to or upsetting the generalisa-
tions quoted above. In most of the general text-books and
others, which have occasion to mention these organs, the
quotation of certain birds has become a regular stock in trade,
always the same, copied from one author by the next, who in
turn is quoted as the original authority by the more popular
writer.
So far as I know, I was the first to give a possible explanation
of the one-sided reduction, and I translate here what L wrote in
Bronn’s ‘ Thierreich,’ p. 842, published in 1890. “In all birds
only the left ovary is completely formed and functional; the
right is present in most cases, and may even produce unripe eggs,
but these degenerate later and seem never to become free. In
correlation herewith the right oviduct undergoes early reduction ;
at most it persists towards the cloaca as a ligamentous strand,
may be even as a tube which opens into the cloaca. This one-
sided development of ovary and oviduct may be referable to
saving of space. Two completely developed, hard-shelled eggs
would scarcely have room in the belly, and we may add that even
in the left oviduct two complete eggs seem to be very exceptional,
if such ever occur. In Reptiles, however, both ovaries and ducts
are equally developed.”
This idea could not have been expressed more guardedly than
by the following sentence in the ‘ Dictionary of Birds,’ p. 783:
“This one-sided suppression of the organs may possibly be
* Wagener; (1) Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie, 1834.
(2) Beitrage zur Anatomie der Végel. Abhandl. Minch. Akad.
Wiss. i1. 1837, pp. 271-283.
- + Sranntus’s Lehrbuch der vergleichenden Anatomie. 1846.
{ OwEn: Anatomy of Vertebrates, vol. 11. 1866.
810 DR. HANS GADOW ON OVARIES
referable to the inconvenience that might be caused were each
oviduct to contain an egg ready to be deposited.” Mr. Gunn *
takes a reporter's liberty by substituting for ‘ inconvenience ”
various gruesome calamities, as fracture of the egg-shell, rupture
of the oviduct, and even peritonitis ! ! After thus having tried to
throw ridicule upon my generally accepted notion, he assures us
that such evil sequences need not be assumed at all because
of “the frequency with which Falconide are found with paired
ovaries, which are obviously functional.” Then he proceeds to
distinguish between several theoretical possibilities besides the
only actual condition, namely, that in which the functional organs
are those of the left side.
Not a single case is known of a completely developed right
duct, whilst the left is vestigial. Further, I withdraw the state-
ment made in the ‘ Dictionary of Birds,’ that ‘but with rare
exceptions only that [ovary | on the left side becomes functional.”
‘“‘ Functional,’ I regret to say, was there used in a loose way,
since the right ovary not unfrequently forms rather large eggs.
But strictly it should be called functional only if any of those
eggs ever became ripe, 7. e. burst from the ovary. We know
that even relatively large ovarial eggs, even those of the left
side, can undergo complete reduction ft.
Mr. Gunn, however, taking for granted that growing eggs in
both ovaries mean that both are functional, and that, although
two ovaries may not be a necessity, they must be better than one
(a principle which has produced the double-barrelled gun), has to
face the question whether one oviduct can serve two ovaries.
We are told that “there is not much evidence for or against this
supposition,” and that “‘ there seems no physical objection to the
open end of the tube swinging across the mid-line of the spine,
and grasping the right ovum of the opposite ovary with nearly
the same facility as the ovum of its own side.” One physical
objection to this amazing trick-performance may be the gut with
its loops and mesenteries, and it is at least doubtful whether the
agile tube (the infundibulum of which is most carefully anchored
opposite its own ovary) can overcome these obstacles, in spite of
the best-intentioned regulating nerve-stimulus.
Let us enquire further into the meaning of the one-sided
reduction of the female bird’s reproductive organs.
Gegenbaur { favours the size of the egg, the complete egg with
albumen and shell, as the primary cause :—‘“ Bei den Vogeln
gelangt nur das linke Ovar zu seiner volligen Ausbildung dh. nur
* T. BE. Gunn.—“On the Ovaries in certain British Birds,” P. Z. S. 1912, p. 63.
Mr. Gunn and the Rev. F. C. R. Jourdain credit the late Prof. Newton with the
authorship of the article “ Reproductive Organs ” in the ‘Dictionary of Birds,’ and
they suggest as his “German source” of original information T'aschenberg’s Intro-
duction to Naumann’s ‘ Naturgeschichte,’ re-edited in 1905, eleven years “after the
‘Dictionary of Birds.’ ; d
T Cf. A. yon Brunn: “Die Rickbildung nicht ausgestossener Hierstockseier bei
Vogeln.” Beitrage zur Anatomie und Embryologie, als Festgabe ftir Jakob Henle.
Bonn, 1882.
+ Vergleichende Anatomie der Wirbelthiere, i 1. 1901, p. 503.
AND OVIDUCILS IN THE AMNIOTA. 811
in ihm kommen Hier zur Reife, und das rechte erhilt sich nur bei
einzelnen (manchen Accipitres, Schwimmvégeln und einzelnen Gat-
tungen verschiedener Abtheilungen) fort, indess es bei den iibrigen
verktimmert. Dies steht in Zusammenhang mit der Ausbildung
nur eines (des linken) Oviductes und mit dem bedeutenderen
Volum der Hier, wodurch jeweils nur einem einzigen ein lingerer
Aufenthalt in der engen Beckenhohle gestattet ist. Hs ist also
hier die kiickbildung einer Hadlfte des gesammten weiblichen
Geschlechtsapparates von der Ausbildung des Hivolums abhingig,
und dadurch an einen héheren Zustand geknipft, dass das mit
reichlichem Eiweiss und Dotter ausgestatte Ei das sich in ihm
entwickelnde Junge zu einer bedeutenderen Ausbildung gelangen
lisst.” The correlations mentioned in these cumbrously involved
sentences are valid enough, but they do not carry the question
any further than where I had left it.
Since the ovary is the prime organ and the duct merely
auxiliary, it might be assumed @ priori that the primary cause
of the reduction was the cessation of the production of ripe
eggs on one side, whereupon degeneration of the corresponding
duct would follow, as there would be no longer any work for it.
Illicit, undesirable traffic is stopped best by cutting off the
supply, in the present case by the stoppage of ripening eggs at
the source. But, as we have seen, this does not agree with the
facts, considering the frequent activity of right ovaries, whilst
right ducts are much rarer. Further, we know that even com-
paratively far advanced ovarial eggs can be resorbed. Lastly,
we should have every right to expect birds with right, and others
with left functional organs. It cannot well be assumed that the
one-sided reduction is an inheritance from reptilian ancestors, of
which unfortunately we know nothing. Of recent reptiles only
Crocodiles and Tortoises can be studied for the sake of analogy.
These produce for one clutch a considerable number of hard-
shelled eggs which pass through both ducts. The eggs are well
protected, and there is ample room for them in the broad body
of Chelonians, and there is likewise space and safety in the long
belly of a Crocodile.
Presumably therefore the cause of the asymmetry should lie in
the typical organisation of the bird. In proportion to its body
the eggs are enormous, especially in some of the nidifugous
groups which represent the lower conditions. They could not
well produce the whole clutch at once; and they incubate
their eggs, not merely because they require several days,
even weeks, to produce the full number, but because as warm-
blooded creatures they have reached a higher state of reproductive
organisation. There is no room within the pelvis for more than
one complete hard-shelled egg, leaving aside the inconvenience
of a right and a left egg which, for argument’s sake, might be
overcome, as is actually the case with reptiles. The available
space in the bird’s belly is limited ; the longitudinal distance is
relatively much shorter than in the majority of reptiles which
are devoid of a sacrum, and the peculiar pelvis of birds is as
812 . DR. HANS GADOW ON OVARIES
broad as is compatible with the upright walking and with the
flying organisation. Most likely the broadness and the absence
of symphyses have been produced in adaptation to the eggs, but
even the distention of the belly downwards must be limited in
the bird, which is essentially and primarily a flying creature.
Well, then, let us take it that it is advantageous that one of
the ducts and the activity of the corresponding ovary should be
suppressed. Instances of asymmetry, brought about by sup-
pression of one of originally paired organs, are common enough
in the Vertebrata, and they can in most cases be fairly explained
by mechanical factors. To refer them to mere accident, to a
toss up, which then becomes established, is too shallow a mode,
although not unprecedented in morpholog ry. ‘The tadpoles of
some Anura have paired “spiracles,” others a median, the majority
a left hole. The reduction of one of the lungs of Snakes and
snake-shaped Lizards is of course directly correlated with the
shape of the body, and it appears almost optional whether the
right or the left lung should be affected, since both cases have
become established in the various groups.
If we apply the principle of elimination of all those unfortunate
hen-birds which happened to produce eggs in either side, whilst
only those birds propagate the race which happen to have only
one side in working order, this would not explain the universal
right-sided suppression, which accor ding to Gegenbaur is a
weighty argument for the monophyletic origin of the class*. If
we assumed this as a proof of their monophylism, we should
logically arrive not only at the imaginary pair of “ Urvégel” but
also at the Eve of hens, which in her case would relegate the
establishment of the asymmetry to a toss up. During the
presumably long period of dawning bird-life such a one-sided
incipient suppression must have taken place over and over again
before it was firmly established. Inheritance, if not swamped
by panmixis, might have established asymmetry, but once more
we are groping in the dark for a cause which favours the left
side. It must be a factor which is very ancient and yet does
not interfere with the symmetry of the male organs, neither the
testes nor the vasa deferentia. Since the ovaries are strictly
homologous, or rather homogeneous, with the testes, this may be
taken as another hint that the ovaries are not the parts primarily
atfected. But the male ducts are not the same as the female ducts,
therefore the latter are indicated. No factor causing the
asymmetry can be derived from the vascular system, nor even
from the vestiges of the renal portal system, by the suppression
of which birds and mammals differ from their common ancestors,
the reptiles. To refer the enlarged left ovary and duct to the
* The suppression of one lung in Snakes, etc. stands on a different footing. It
may be due to an accident or sport,as much as right- and left-clawed crabs, or
right- and left-twisted shells. The remaining lung enlarges and shifts its position
s0 as to occupy most of the space originally intended for both.—H. &.
—. -. 2
AND OVIDUCTS IN THE AMNIOTA. 813
stronger arterial supply would of course mean mistaking effect
for cause *.
A sufficient cause, however, may be the fact that a full ovi-
duct is less lable to disturb the other intestines in the left half
of the body-cavity than in the right. The primary intestinal
loops are so arranged or packed, that their bases begin on the
right whilst their apices extend towards or into the left side of
the abdomen. This is especially the case with those loops which
starting to the right of the stomach (itself mostly shoved to
the left) fill the space between stomach and vent with their
distal halves. It needs no further comment that it is the
free or apical end, and not the base of a loop where the
mesenteric vessels enter, which is displaced easiest and which
will easiest resume its original position. But this packing
from right to left is not an adaptation to, and is not produced
by the preponderance of the left oviduct. It can be traced
to a much more primitive condition, namely to the fact that
the bird’s embryo comes to rest with its left side upon the yolk,
with its curved back towards the blunt pole. In all probability
this is a truly cenogenetic feature, essentially ontogenetic ; one
of those numerous phenomena which, like the gills of tadpoles,
the allantois and placenta, are originally incidental to embryonic
life, although they may by correlated after-effects profoundly
influence even the adult organism. Obvious results of this left-
sided position of the embryo are the increasing preponderance of
the left vitelline vein ; the yolk-stalk causes the first loop of the
midgut; the stomach itself sinks in, turning the pylorus to the
right, upon which side the duodenal loop descends, and further
secondary loops of the midgut follow suit. If there are large
ceca, they likewise make their way towards the right and back
of the stomach. The allantoic bag, containing fluid only, rises
and comes to lie upon the embryo, 7. e. upon its right side.
Consequently there is asymmetry introduced at an early date,
which affects the viscera, notably the gut, and introduces a bias
in their mutual behaviour within the belly. During the growth
of the embryo, by shrinking of the yolk room becomes available
for extension of the gut towards the left side. The permanent
organs will soon—speaking from the point of evolution—establish
an equilibrium, whilst it is clear that any occasional or contingent
requirement of space, or disturbance, can be met with easiest in
the left half. Such a disturbance is caused by the periodic
growth and passage of the eggs which brook no delay. The
slightest bias will turn the scales, and now we may apply the
censorship of natural selection to its fullest extent. Left eggs
* The suppression of the right oviduct has had an effect upon the male copulatory
organ. Where such is present it is asymmetrical, although unpaired, and stowed
away in a left-sided recess of the cloaca. The act invariably takes place from the
left side, and the same applies to those birds which are now devoid of such an intro-
mittent organ.
814 DR. HANS GADOW ON OVARIES
and a left duct will be the least liable to set up complications.
Two canals may be good, but one improved way is better, and if
the traffic goes in one direction only, the other duct falls into
abeyance. If goods are still produced at the terminus of the _
obsolete line, they will deteriorate, but this does not matter if
the output of the opposite factory is equal to the demand.
So far so good, and the enquiry need not be carried further
back, if it were not for the Monotremes. Although these archaic
creatures show no appreciable difference in the size of their
paived ovaries and ducts, only those of the left side are functional.
According to Semon, Ornithorhynchus invariably produces two
eggs, always in the left side; Hchidna lays only one egg, also
left-sided. The right ovary forms numerous large eggs which
never ripen, and the respective duct and uterus are swollen and
much vacuolised during theseason. In short, Monotremes behave
exactly like certain abnormal birds, e.g. the famous Sparrow-hawk,
by the retention of an ancestral feature which is now normally
lost. Since the reduction in the Monotremes has made so little
progress, it looks as if it were but of comparatively recent date,
but at the same time so ancient as not to have interfered with
the inheritance of the full symmetry by the Meta- and Hutheria.
The Monotremes are no longer quite primitive, not even in these
organs. Their eggs have lost much of the yolk; they continue
to grow in bulk within the uterus after they have received their
keratine shell. Indeed, we cannot well imagine that, compared
with oviparous reptiles and birds, the very small egg of the
Monotremes, and the imperfect, almost larval condition of
the new-born represent truly ancestral conditions, unless—
and this is well worth further enquiry—we are prepared to
assume that in all Vertebrata the viviparous condition was
primary to one in which the feetus is surrounded by a shell and
then hatched outside the mother. If this should be the case, we
should further have to distinguish between primordial viviparity
(of which recent examples are unlikely) and secondary, pseudo-
primitive viviparity, the numerous instances of which have been,
and are still being, acquired independently: many Sharks and
Teleosts; many Urodela, even one or two of the Anura, and
many scattered cases among the reptiles, as some Chameleons
and Lacertide, Iguanide and Anguide, all the Scincide, all the
thoroughly aquatic snakes, the Viperide, and here and there
some other terrestrial kinds. But to return to the Monotremes.
Can their incipient, or perhaps arrested, asymmetry be referred to
the same embryonic conditions as those which prevail in Birds 2
The bulk of the egg is formed by the yolk, the yolk-stalk might
be strong enough to cause a disturbance, the allantois protrudes
towards the right, and the left vitelline vein preponderates.
How far, and if at all, the viscera are affected by these conditions,
remains unknown. For our purpose it is significant that there
is incipient asymmetry (functional although scarcely structural),
and that this should be restricted to the only recent Mammals
AND OVIDUCTS IN THE AMNIOTA. 815
which still possess comparatively large-yolked eggs. However,
the Monotreme embryo does not turn upon its left side, it merely
sinks into the cavity of the emptied yolk-sac, forming a
proamnion ; the bird, owing to its enormous yolk, turns over
and ultimately comes to he on its curved back; the reptilian
embryo must also sink in, but it does not turn. This turning
over, so marked a feature in the bird, may be correlated with
the conditions of incubation. Everybody knows that the
chalaze keep the blastoderm ‘on the top,” i.e. nearest the
source of warmth, against the hen’s body *. This does not apply
to reptiles which deposit their eggs in the ground, nor to the one
or two eggs in the moist pouch of the Monotremes; lastly, to the
embryo of viviparous and ovoviviparous creatures ‘“ orientation ”
towards the source of heat is not only unnecessary, it would
also be impossible because the mother changes so much her own
position by moving about.
Since no trace of functional asymmetry of ovaries and ducts
appears in Meta- and Kutheria, and as that of the Monotremes
cannot well be a reptilian inheritance (because their asymmetry
is usually marked by an enlargement of the right gonads and
ducts, e.g. Snakes and Crocodiles, both sides however being
functional), the asymmetry of the Monotremes must be due to a
departure within the Prototheria, but so slight as not to have
caused any irreparable morphological reduction of either ovaries
or ducts by the time that the Prototheria entered upon the next
higher or Metatherian stage, excepting of course the Monotremes.
If Prototheria ever laid eggs much larger than they are now, the
asymmetry may have been greater and be referable to the same
primary causes as those suggested for birds, but since the recent
Monotremes seem to be actually in the process of reducing them
now, and moreover to the last possible number, the left-sidedness
seems to be a case of mere coincidence with birds.
Some simplification of the completely double female apparatus
of the Vertebrates was bound to come; it was a matter of time,
and success depended upon the grade or height of the general
organisation of those who attempted it. Any agreement
between birds and mammals versus reptiles cannot be anything
more than convergent resemblances, at best cases of Isotely.
The classes of both Birds and Mammals have gone beyond the level
of the Reptilian organisation and they represent highest termini ;
but, although the class of Birds is by far the most specialised and
in various respects has reached seemingly unsurpassable perfec-
tion, the class of Mammals is morphologically the highest, in
spite of its still comprising such lowly, undecided types as the
* The usual statement that the hen turns the eggs over from time to time in
order to ensure the equal warming of the whole egg, now the upper and then the
lower half, implies nonsense. What the sitting bird does, is to rearrange the
position of the eggs with reference to each other, to give those now lying peripherally
an equal chance of best position near the centre. With a small clutch this is not
necessary, but with a dozen eggs the frequent rearrangement is very noticeable, at
least with thoughtful sitters.
816 DR. HANS GADOW ON OVARIES
Monotremes (¢f. loss of the nucleus of red blood corpuscles,
structure of the atrio-ventricular valves, the alveolar lungs, the
abolishment of the cloaca, the cranio-dental articulation of
the underjaw, etc.).
The Elasmobranchs show various instances of precocious in-
ventions, ahead of the times, foredoomed to failure or further
improvement, because their owners are after all but low fishes.
In some the ovary is single, unpaired, but it lies in the middle.
Some Acanthopteri1 have succeeded in producing a median duct
out of their otherwise paired ovarial sacs. Birds, as we have
seen, have suppressed one side; a clumsy mode of procedure
because it has a lopsided result and implies the reduction, by
neglect, of one of the precious gonads. It is only the higher-
eraded organisation of the Mammals which has succeeded in
simplifying the apparatus in the morphologically neatest way,
namely, by the partial fusion of the two ducts into one passage,
not only unpaired, but median, whilst the upper ends and the
ovaries remain intact and functional.
Monotremes, Marsupials, and Placentals form an unbroken,
progressive, therefore most probably monophyletic series. The
reduction in question could not be brought about until the
reptilian plan of hard-shelled eggs had given way to internal
gestation. The differences between ovlparous, OVvOviviparous,
implacentally and placentally viviparous, are questions of degree
only. ‘There is for instance no difference, to be expressed in a
few words, between the ovoviviparous fruit of a Viper and the
newborn feetus of a Kangaroo, except that the newborn reptile is
complete and must shift for itself. The point is that the young
bursts its egg, and other membranes, with the act of birth.
Whilst no newborn reptile requires maternal care, most birds do,
and all mammals are absolutely dependent on their mothers for
nourishment.
Within the Class of Birds every stage from almost reptilian
to practically mammalian conditions is represented. The
typical nidifugous birds are hatched with still a considerable
amount of yolk slipped into the belly, sufficient for the little ones
to hold out for days without food until they are bodily and
mentally strong enough to feed themselves; in many cases they
have to be shown by the parents how to do it. Next come those
which are hatched in a more or less helpless condition and must
be fed by the parents with food either in its natural state or
already semidigested. Lastly, those which are nursed with a
milky secretion of the crop. The higher Altrices or Nidicole are
born with but small remnants of yolk left, the digestive organs
having been hurried on at the expense of the others. The most
significant point, however, is that through the crop-secretion
the Pigeons have established a parallel with the Mammals in so
far as the young are fed actually with parental matter, in which
proliferation and fatty degeneration of epithelial cells plays a
great part. The analogy can be carried still further, since by
AND OVIDUCTS IN THE AMNIOTA. 817
Pigeons and some of the lower mammals this “milk” is squeezed
or injected into the young.
The Mammalian evolution has probably gone through many
stages and vicissitudes, difficult to enumerate, because there were
many factors and not all the organs changed at the same time.
1. We stajt with a hypothetical stage of Sauro-mammalia.
The hard-shelled egg, when laid, contains an already far advanced
embryo, therefore ovoviviparous. This egg was not so much
incubated for warmth as covered for protection by the mother.
The young although hatched in a reptilian condition was pro-
tected by the mother.
2. Reduction of the size of the egg. Gradual preponderance
of extra-uterine nursing over uterine gestation, made possible
and introduced by the protecting insulation, in such a way that
an abdominal incubation area was developed, owing to the
reaction of the mother’s abdominal surface by the sat-upon,
adpressed, covered egg; this resulted in hypertrophic condition
of the cutaneous blood-vessels, hence of the glands, and correlated
reduction of hairs. Incidental change of absorption of moisture
through the porous shell, enhanced by loss of its calcareous
portion— When this suppression had been well established, by
progressive inheritance, the now quite porous parchment ege had
the same chances of absorbing fluid whilst still m the oviduct.
At the same time it stands to reason that the chances of external
or brood-pouch nourishing may become prevalent. The shorten-
ing of the life-period within the egg implies the birth of an
unripe foetus. Foetal life must be taken as ending with the
bursting of the egg, no matter whether this act coincides with
the moment of parturition, or whether it happens some time
after the egg has been “laid.” In either case it coincides with
the cessation of any further possibility of function of yolk-sac
and allantois.
We must further assume that the actual length of time re-
quired for the production of a young animal is the same in
equal-sized creatures from the beginning of segmentation until
it is independent. Unless we assume this, the argumentation
would become too complicated.
Let us say that it took 50 days from impregnation until the
Sauro-mammalian youngster was ready to face the Permian
world. This means:
50 days of ovoviviparous, internal uterine life ...........................(Sauro-mammal),
40 days uterine and 10 days incubation-life within the laid ege......... (Hypotheria).
BO » LON sp and 10 days nursing in pouch
(Prototheria).
20 ;; » 5? ,, 2 25 5 3 (Monotremes).
8 2” oy) 0 ,, oy) 42 ” o) (Opossum),
The suppression of the incubation-life marks the Metatherian
stage just as sharply as the introduction of incubation of a
foetus marked the early Mammal stage. The adaptation to the
818 DR. HANS GADOW ON OVARIES
new invention of pouch-life and nursing caused the development
of an entirely new category of features—of features which were
not required either by the foetus or the adult, therefore larval,
é. g. &® suctorial apparatus with its far-reaching incidental in-
fluences upon the future adult structures.
In these respects viviparous reptiles, Hypo- and Prototheria
culminating in Monotremes, and Metatheria culminating in
Marsupials, represent a continuous progressive series, with a
logical terminus characterised by the enormous preponderance
of extra- over intra-uterine development. Compared with these
terminal Marsupials the Eutheria seem to be totally different,
provided we take as their type those which are born complete,
in this respect lke the hypothetical Sauro-mammals, the whole
of the ‘50 days” being intra-uterine. And yet the Eutheria have
with certainty passed through the same Metatherian stage as
have the Marsupials, and this Metatherian stage comprised,
besides others, the following features*: Truly viviparous ; allan-
toic placenta; marsupium; diphyodont teeth, the same two
middle series of a total of prelacteal, lacteal, permanent and post-
permanent sets; nipples; semi-cloaca; absence of a corpus
callosum.
To arrange any one of these features into successive morpho-
logical stages is comparatively easy, but it does not follow that
these represent exactly the phylogeny of the groups, because of
the complicated correlations with other organs which by no
means keep step with each other, neither in the same species nor
in the greater groups. Some are precocious, even hypertelic,
while others lag behind.
Just as to the large egg of the truly oviparous Sauropsids
albumen (more watery but less fatty yolk) is added, before it
receives its calcareous shell, so in the Monotremes fluid is added
to the contents of the egg, but with the remarkable difference
that fluid matter is taken into the yolk-sac itself by osmosis
from the uterine walls, after the keratine shell has already
been developed. This process is correlated with an un-
doubted previously acquired reduction of the amount of ovarial
yolk, and is as much a secondary process as the loss of calcareous
matter in the parchment-like “‘ keratine” shell.
As Semon has shown, the whole shell-enclosed egg multiplies
its size during its passage through the oviduct. This mode of
growth finds a curious parallel analogy in various Lacertilia, the
parchment-shelled eggs of which grow considerably after they
have been deposited.
Whilst the Sauropsidan allantois comes to surround the whole
yolk-sac and also nearly the whole of the albumen, so as to
spread over most of the inner surface of the egg, the Monotreme
* Of. R. Semon: “ Monotremen u. Marsupialier,” in Zoolog. Forschung. Australien,
ii. 1894-97; further, J.T. Wilson and J. P. Hill’s papers in Q. J. M.S. 1897, 1898,
1900.
AND OYIDUCTS IN THE AMNIOTA. 819
allantois and yolk-sac balance each other. ‘The shell-enclosed egg
is for a short time transferred into the marsupium (cf. Semon,
Kchidna ; not into a bursa as was imagined by Klaatsch, Gegen-
baur, and others), which secretes fluid (the “‘ nutritive sweat” in
Gegenbaur’s unfortunate diction), and this can be taken up by
the embryo through the porous shell. This may be the reason
why the shell is soon cast off.
In Marsupials the shell is at first still present, but soon absorbed
within the oviduct. The egg-membranes, etc., of the embryo
establish no structural communication with the uterus. The
ovarial yolk is much reduced. But the yolk-sac becomes en-
larged, as in the Monotremes, still occupies a great portion
of the inner egg-surface, and has established intimate contact
with the serosa. The allantois, being independent of the expansion
of the ccelom, which results in the driving away of the yolk-sac
vessels from the somatopleure, establishes a villous placenta.
Such must have been the condition of the Metatheria.
In Perameles the allantois still reaches the surface, where it
is very vascular, and fused with the serosa, a truly respiratory
arrangement. The placenta being lost in most other Marsupials,
the allantois reverts to its primary function of urinary receptacle,
although apparently late during the feetal life.
The Metatherian stage may therefore be characterised as one
in which the posterior of the two bags, the allantois, has super-
seded the previous attempts of placentation by the yolk-sac.
The new placenta was perhaps not advanced enough to prevent
the foetus from being born soon after the limited amount of yolk
was used up. Certainly it did not pass beyond the non-deciduous
stage, and it never reached the extent of even the lowest recent
Eutherian placenta. Yet one effect of this incipient organ must
have been to render the feetus less independent than that of a
viviparous reptile. It had therefore still to be transferred into
the marsupium, there to be kept moist and suckled in as
premature a condition as the Monotreme.
Two opposite tendencies are inherent to this stage. One
palingenetic, to give birth when the yolk is used up; the other
cenogenetic, to prolong the retention of the fetus because of the
compensatory, respiratory, etc. advantages incidental with a
placenta. Obviously the Metatherian stage was a_ half-way
house at a parting of the ways to further improvements, leading
to Marsupials* and to Placentals.
* We have here an instance of the well-known fact that Group-names based upon
single anatomical features are mostly unsuitable for classificatory purposes. ‘The
taxonomic value of these characters may be good enough, but they are not diagnostic.
If such names were used merely as labels without much intrinsic meaning, well and
good, but even the best of us cannot, on occasion, resist taking their face-value for
full value. There are Mammalia Implacentalia with a placenta, and we now know
that the young Echidna does not he in a bursa. Odontornithes are a valueless,
heterogeneous assembly, and overcontideuce in “ Ratite” was responsible for
having branded Hesperornis as a “swimming Ostrich.” ‘“ Mammalia” is for-
tunately an excellent term, although invented before Monotremes were known.
820 DR. HANS GADOW ON OVARIES
To judge from analogy the new organ should continue straight
on, leading in this case through a diffuse and cotyledonary to a
solid, and from a non-deciduous to a deciduous placenta, ter-
minating in the birth of the young in an utterly helpless con-
dition. “As a rule the non-deciduous and diffuse placenta i is found
in those mammals which at birth require least maternal care.
The latter implies greater mental capacity. But we also know
from analogy that a recent invention—although it may be
capabie of much perfection—is not always kept up if the old
string to the bow is still capable of further adaptation. Where
both alternatives are good, workable, and capable of being
improved, it may take a long time to settle which is after all the
better of the two.
What has induced some Metatheria to neglect the further
development of their placenta and to intensify the marsupial
alternative? The morphological and physiological momentum
was surely on the side of improving placentation. There
must have been some external, environmental influence, and
it was Dollo’s brilliant suggestion that arboreal life was the
underlying cause. His further explanation is less acceptable,
that the climbing habits have caused premature births, which
have become habitual, and that the hapless foetus had therefore
to be nursed and located in a marsupium, the bursa, or rather
multiple burs, beimg no longer sufficient.
I think the new conditions to be faced by intense arboreal
life have acted somewhat differently, especially if, as we assume
now, all the Metatheria were already possessed of a marsupium*.
I venture to suggest that those Metatheria which were driven
to arboreal life, had to solve the question what to do with
their young. They had to carry them, and being already pos-
sessed of the pouch, this was not only retained but intensified
by prolonged use. That the facilities offered by such a pouch
are great, is shown by the still existing numerous and much
diversified Marsupials, and by the fact that some at least, e. g.
Opossum, have reduced the uterine gestation almost to the
conceivably lowest limit. Whilst these arborealised Metatheria
could not afford to leave their young behind, it was different
with those other Metatheria which during the Cretaceous epoch
somewhere “‘in the larger and more effective workshops of the
North” (to apply here one of Darwin’s happiest expressions) went
* Klaatsch’s view of the correlation between Bursee and Marsupium had to be
considerably modified by Semou’s discovery that the Monotreme does not lie in a
bursa but in an already typical, though transient, marsupium. Moreover, there are
unmistakable vestiges of marsupial - muscles, other than compressores Mamm2,
in various Placentals. Lastly, each teat with its areola does represent a bursa
(Klaatsch), but if each bursa had been a brodd-pouch instead of merely the result of
the attachment of young, the possession of a series of burs from near the vulva
up to the armpit would imply an impossible condition. In fact, bursz or nipples
can be formed independent of a marsupium and in places whereto no such organ
can have extended.
AND OVIDUCTS IN THE AMNIOTA, 821
in for that further mental development which is intimately
correlated with the origin of the corpus callosum. Competition is
most effective if backed by brain-power. Where these dawning.
Kutheria spread the other Metatheria had to go to the wall, or
were forced to get out of reach—into the trees. Those which,
already arborealised, found their way into countries like Australia,
where the Eutheria could not follow in time, found there
nothing to prevent them from becoming again terrestrial, as
Dollo has shown so conclusively. The chance of reviving the
degenerated placenta was, however, gone, and the Marsupials are
now, in spite of the retention of various low characters, the most
specialised subclass of Mammals.
The Edentates present a striking analogous case : being with-
out exception arboreal or fossorial, they ‘also seem to have got
out of the way of mentally higher, dangerous Kutheria. They
have survived, whilst those that went in for heavy bulk and
armour were not a great success. At least the American Eden-
tates seem to have come into contact with the dangerous
Kutheria long after they themselves had become typical Eutheria,
so that the former possession of a marsupium could avail them
nothing.
A few words about the Eutheria. They could afford to part
with their young for a time and to suckle them intermittently,
an advantage which needs no further comment than that it
would be impossible without higher mental faculties.
Great adaptive changes have been wrought; every chance has
been tried, now here, then there. Nearly all the Non-deciduata
are at birth precocious, able to look after themselves, no matter
whether the placenta is diffuse, cotyledonary or zonary even,
namely the aquatic Cetacea and Sirenia, and the Artio- and
Perissodactyles, the exception being the Lemurs. The Deciduata
are at birth helpless: Rodents, Insectivores, Carnivores, Chiro-
ptera, Tarsius and Simiz, except the Elephants.
The egg-laying Monotremes, the implacental Marsupials, and
the Mammals with the most advanced placenta, are born in a
condition as helpless as the highest nidicolous birds, whilst the
avowedly low non-deciduous and diffuse placenta of the Mare i
sufficient to produce a young which is as precocious and in-
dependent as a lizard.
Can these facts be brought into line? What is here primitive
and what is a roundabout return to apparent but not really
ancestral conditions 2
Proc. Zoot, Soc.—1912, No. LV. 5d
822 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
49, Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrange-
ment of the Cestoidea. By Frank E. Bepparp, M.A.,
D.Sc., F.R.S., F.Z.S., Prosector to the Society.
[Received April 30, 1912: Read June 4, 1912.]
(Text-figures 113-121.)
VI. On aw AsexuAL TAPEWORM FROM THE RopENt, Fiber zibethicus,
showing a new form of Asexual Propagation, and on the
supposed Sexual Form.
INDEX.
Page
ST AAELELA DUD Sw Pe eRendrdond: cnowedederonondeeeeaadde coosaopacenesed™ |ce!13)
Systematic :
Urocystidium gemmiparum, gen. et sp. n....... 840
General Résumé and Systematic Position ............ 849
Anatomical Summary ...........ccee cece eeeeeeeeeeee ss 850
I received in February of this year two complete tapeworms
which were found in the hepatic duct of a Musquash (fiber
zibethicus) which died in the Society’s Gardens. The two worms
lay together in a part of the hepatic duct just before it receives
the bile-duct, which was much dilated by the parasites. Although
these two worms were very different in appearance, I believe them
to be respectively the sexual and asexual form of the same species.
T shall give reasons for this conclusion in the course of the
following description of the two individuals.
(1) THe AsexuaL Form.
The general appearance of this very remarkable worm is
shown in text-fig. 113 (p. 824), which illustrates its most
remarkable peculiarity, viz., the possession of two series of
what appear to be buds at one end of the body. It will be seen
in the course of my description of this “ Cysticercoid” that it is
without any doubt to be regarded as an asexual form. It does
not, however, follow that the mature worm found with it is a
further stage in its development. On the contrary, indeed; for
as a mere matter of guesswork, the assumption would be the other
way. Still, I believe that I shall be able to prove that the two
worms are stages of the same species, in which event we have the
very remarkable fact of both the sexual and the asexual form
coexisting in the same host, and, moreover, in a situation where
one would expect to meet with sexual forms only. The Hymeno-
lepis* of the mouse is a partly, but not an entirely, parallel
instance.
At first it seems likely, from an inspection of the figure
* HH, murina.
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM, 823
annexed, that the wider end of the worm is the scolex and that
the narrower end is the posterior extremity where the proglottids
are being shed. The dilated extremity suggests a scolex not
altogether unlike that of the genus Dasywrotenia, which I have
lately described to this Society *, and which is characterised by
an unusually swelled scolex. Furthermore, there is a slight
diminution in the diameter of the worm towards the narrower
end, which again conforms to this view, which, as a matter of fact,
I at first held myself. It appears, however, that the reverse in
fact is the case, and that the narrower end is the scolex end.
The opposite extremity therefore is, as I suppose, to be compared
to the persisting bladder of the bladder-worm stage of the
Cestode. To the naked eye, and even on examination with a
lens, the scolex end presents every appearance of being the proli-
ferating end of the body, for. the last segments appear to be
slightly incurved, as 1s so commonly the case at that end. It was
not until I studied this region by means of a series of horizontal
sections that I was able to discover its true relations. And even
now certain important details are wanting.
T could find, indeed, no armed scolex, nor any trace of suckers ;
if the worm is a member of the Pseudophyllidia and has there-
fore only bothria, these may easily have escaped attention in such
sections, which would not be suitable for their display. I cut the
sections, in fact, under the impression that I was dealing with the
posterior end of the body, and without making a sufficiently ex-
haustive survey of the external characters. The main arguments,
therefore, which lead me to the conclusion that this is really the
scolex end are firstly the mode of imbrication of the proglottids,
and secondly the presence of large pigment granules, a condition
which would hardly be expected at the posterior end of the body,
but which is not uncommon among tapeworms in the scolex.
As to the imbrication of the proglottids it seems to me to be
necessary to regard a segment which overlaps the next one as
being anterior to it in point of origin, and therefore lying to the
scolex side of it. Judged by this conclusion, the narrower end of
the body of this very remarkable tapeworm is the scolex end.
There is no evidence that a scolex has been lost. On the
contrary, the body ends here in a slight median elevation, which
is quite unlike the termination of the body were this the region
of the detachment of proglottids. This little elevation, however,
bears no particular likeness to a scolex, and there are certainly no
suckers or hooks to be seen anywhere. Nor is there any neck, or
break of any kind, between this region and the first obvious pro-
glottid. In this latter, moreover, the lateral and transverse tubes
of the water vascular system are as large as in the more posterior
segments, and do not end in a coil such as is so frequent in the
anterior part of this systemin other worms. It may be, of course,
that the scolex is in this genus a transitory affair, as it has been
* P.Z.S. 1912, p. 677.
55*
824 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
believed to be (though perhaps hardly now) in certain other tape-
worms. Or, on the contrary, we may have here a feebly developed
head like that of Zigula. But the great breadth of the body of
the present worm is not perhaps in favour of such a supposition.
Had there been a very narrow anterior neck, some suggestion of
this kind might have been put forward. Anyhow, the general
characters of the anterior region of the body of this Cestode are
as described above. We shall recur to their more minute anatomy
Text-fig. 113.
The upper figure represents the entire asexual form of Urocystidium gemmiparwn
enlarged by about one-third. The lower figure is the posterior end of the same
individual more magnified. For explanation see text.
later. From this point to the extreme posterior end are very
many proglottids. They are very short and wide, and do not
appear to differ very appreciably in length in different regions of
the body. The greatest diameter is something like 4mm. This
is at and towards the posterior end of the body. Quite anteriorly,
the diameter is not more than 25mm. The length of the entire
worm is about 80 mm.; the small posterior bladder is 3 mm. long
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 825
by 2°5-3 mm. wide. The proliferating end of the worm ceases
abruptly with the commencement of the bladder. This region,
which bears a great many lateral buds, shown in the text-figure
referred to, measures 17 mm. The region of the body which
bears these presumed buds (we shall consider their nature later)
does not differ much from the preceding section. It looks,
perhaps, a little more transparent, but it is divided up exactly in
the same way into proglottids, which are of about the same
dimensions as those elsewhere in the body. The buds form a row
on each side of the body and are quite lateral in position ; they
- are not at all arranged in order of growth, though representing
very many stages. That is to say, the older buds alternate with
younger and older forms. Nor does every proglottid bear a bud
or pair of buds (one on each side). Between any two buds there
was often a variable number of proglottids without any trace of
budding at all. This, indeed, is necessary; for the large size of
the buds would prevent their proper growth upon immediately
adjacent proglottids. I counted altogether 17 buds upon one
side and 18 upon the other. But I may have omitted one or two
in each case; for it is a little difficult to fix the actual first
appearance of a bud. They begin, in fact, as an only just recog-
nisable rounded swelling of the edge of a proglottid. Sometimes
the swelling includes two proglottids. There is no question
whatever of the continuity of these buds (as I regard them) with
the parent stock; they are most plainly outgrowths therefrom.
In later stages the minute round bosses at the edges of the
segments swell into spherical, largely transparent, vesicles, of
which, as the text-figure (text-fig. 113) shows, the size varies—
possibly according toage. Later still, these bladders show a young
worm growing out from their distal extremity, which is usually
of considerably less diameter than the bladder which is attached
to the parent stock. It exhibits numerous wrinkles which I do
not definitely regard as the delimitations of proglottids. The
longest of these presumed young worms was about 4 mm. in
length; the bladders reached a length of 2 mm. The exact
number of these more developed buds is faithfully reproduced in
text-fig. 113.
§ Structure of the Parent Stock.
I have investigated the anatomy of the worm by transverse,
longitudinal, and sagittal sections. From an inspection of the
former (see text-fig. 114, p. 826) the depressed form of the body
-was obvious, the diameter of a section being about seven times
its depth.
At the thinner anterior end of the body, not far from the actual
extremity, transverse sections showed that the medullary region
of the proglottid was not more than two-thirds of the diameter of
the cortical region. ‘The two were plainly marked off from each
other by delicate transverse fibres forming a very thin layer, and
826 DR. F, E. BEDDARD ON A
yet quite unmistakable. The same proportions and the same
structure were visible as plainly in the wider posterior region of
Text-fig. 114.
Part of a transverse section through a proglottid of the asexual form of
Urocystidium gemmiparum.
A, spaces in middle of proglottid with darkly staining walls referred to in text.
lm. Longitudinal muscular layer of cortex, within which is seen delicate
transverse layer of muscles. .s. Nerve-cord. .d. Dorsal excretory tube,
».v. Ventral excretory tube.
the body. The medullary substance is quite well stained by hema-
toxylin and has the usual homogeneous appearance. ‘There is,
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 827
moreover, in the present worm the usual meshwork arrangement
of fibrils round spherical masses of the homogeneous ground-
substance such as occurs in so many tapeworms, and is often a
very coarse and thus more obvious network. The homogeneous
ground-substance was, however, traversed by two sets of fibres,
which are, I presume, muscular fibres. These are absolutely at
right angles to each other and not at all closely set in either case.
The dorso-ventrally running fibres are nearly always wavy in
their course, the transverse fibres are quite straight—a matter of
different states of contraction, as I imagine.
The cortical layer is easily divisible into two regions, which are
of about equal diameter. The innermost of these is that occupied
by the bundles of longitudinal muscular fibres. The bundles of
muscular fibres are two or sometimes three deep, and each bundle
contains a large number of fibres, which, however, are not very
closely pressed together. In addition to these bundles of rather
slender fibres there lie on either side, between the nerve-cord and
the lateral margin of the proglottid, two bundles of considerably
stouter fibres which run continuously from segment to segment
and are closely associated with a longitudinally running cavity.
These bundles appear on occasions to lie actually within the cavity.
This tubular cavity is not at all like the tubes of the water
vascular system, and it lies within a very lax tissue. Iam unable
at present to suggest its nature.
The accompanying text-figure (text-fig. 115, p. 828) illustrates a
section through the hinder part of the worm not very far in front
of the budding region. ‘This region shows very plainly a system
of irregular spaces in various parts of the body belonging to the
water vascular complex. It may be remarked first of all that the
dorso-ventral diameter is greater here than in the more anterior
part of the body. The structure of the vertical and medullary
regions is the same, but the lower central region of the medulla
actually forms a cavity (text-fig. 114 A) which I do not think to
be artifact and which may be a forward extension of the cavity
of the terminal bladder, though I have not proved the fact, from
an unwillingness to sacrifice the specimen altogether. The in-
terior lining of the space was, however, so very strongly stained
as compared with the surrounding tissues that it appears to me to
be practically certain that the staining fluid gained access through
the two cut ends of the piece of worm, which was stained en bloc.
This, of course, argues a continuous central cavity.
It was quite plain that this cavity was quite distinct from that
of the transverse water vascular trunk. The peculiar central
cavities occupying nearly the middle of a segment here and there,
referred to later (see p. 830) in describing sections made from
earlier segments in the body, are present here and are again not
to be confused with the central lacuna. Their thick walls show
no trace of an opening into it. In addition to the main trunks
of the water vascular system, which are disposed here as they are
elsewhere in the body, there are scattered irregular spaces which
828 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
seem to belong to the same system. These consist of larger but
very short stems with finer branches. I have not traced any con-
nection between these tubes and the main stems of the excretory
system; but I can, nevertheless, hardly doubt that it exists.
Text-fig. 115.
EV.
= a es
A more highly magnified section through excretory vessels and adjacent
structures of the asexual form of Urocystidium gemmiparum.
d.v. Dorsal vessels surrounded by circular muscle-fibre. m. Layer of transverse
muscle-fibres separating the cortex (to the right) from the medulla (to the
left). 2. One of several tubes forming the excretory network and lying, as is
shown, in the cortex as well as in the medulla. ¢.v. Transverse commissural
vessel forking to join the ventral vessel (v.v.), which is also bifurcate to receive
the branches.
These ramifications lie in the cortical layer as well as in the
medullary (text-fig. 115, 7). In one case I observed a narrow
duct leading from a wider space to the exterior—at any rate, most
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 829
undoubtedly to the cuticle, and in other cases it appeared to me
to be highly probable that the ramifications of these tubes do
open on to the exterior here and there; they at least invade the
outermost layer of the cortical tissues.
The water vascular tubes are large in this species, and not far
from being equisized. There are, as is the rule, two upon each
side of the body. As is so often the case among the Cestodes, the
two tubes, instead of being respectively dorsal and ventral and
superposed, lie side by side. As is also quite usual among these
worms, the two tubes, dorsal and ventral, differ somewhat in
structure. I consider that the slightly smaller and more muscular
of the two tubes is the dorsal vessel, from the analogy of other
forms; in the present species, therefore, the dorsal vessel is
situated internally to the ventral. They are, however, quite in
the same straight line for the most part and also in the same
straight line with the nerve-cord. But, as a matter of fact, the
more muscular dorsal tube lies in a corkscrew fashion, which is
very plain when the proglottids are viewed in longitudinal and
sagittal sections, and thus that tube in cross-sections appears to
lie now rather dorsal of, and at times rather ventrally of, the
ventral and more external vessel. Elsewhere they are more
directly in the same straight line. It is a remarkable fact that
both of these vessels seem to be quite as large or very nearly so
in the most anterior segments of the body. There is no great
increase in calibre posteriorly.
The general relations of these two vessels are shown in text-
fig. 114. ext-fig. 115 is a more enlarged representation of the
two tubes and the adjacent parts taken from a section of the
posterior region of the body. ‘Their detailed structure is there
illustrated. In his account of the Cestoidea in Bronn’s ‘ Thier-
reichs,’ Prof. Braun remarks—‘ Ob in der Wand der Sammel-
rohren auch noch Muskelfaseren vorkommen, ist noch strittig.”
The figure just referred to is, as I think, quite conclusive as to the
presence of a particularly thick layer of circular fibres constituting
the greater part of the wall of what I regard as the dorsal vessel.
This muscular layer appears to wax and wane in thickness from
place to place. But it is always thick and thus very apparent.
The actual tube is lined with a chitinous cuticle which is also often
very thick and everywhere to be seen. Outside of the layer of
circular muscles are abundant nuclei, massed round the tube. I
did not observe any nuclei among the circular muscular fibres,
which are, indeed, very closely contiguous. There appear to be
no intrinsic longitudinal muscles to assist in the widening of the
tube again after contraction by the circular muscles; but there is
a mechanism which takes the place of such fibres to serve in their
stead.
In the neighbourhood of the dorsal excretory vessel the dorso-
ventral muscles form groups here and there of rather thicker
and more closely adpressed fibres, which, as it were, tie to or
suspend the dorsal vessel from the cortical layer ; it seems certain
830 : DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
that the contraction of these would dilate the lumen of the dorsal
excretory tube. These fibres, which exist both dorsally and
ventrally, have a somewhat fan-like arrangement—that is to say,
they converge upon the vessel from above and from below. It is
these various muscular layers which cause so great a variation in
the lumen of the excretory tube from place to place.
The ventral vessel differs entirely from the dorsal by the entire
absence of any muscular layers and by the possession of only a
very thin lining cuticle. It follows, therefore, that the variations
in the calibre of this tube are not so great, and when they do
occur seem to be due to a squeezing by the surrounding tissues.
The ventral vessel also runs a much straighter course than the
dorsal without any marked corkscrew-like windings exhibited by
the latter. There is a transverse vessel in each segment which
has a rather peculiar relation to the ventral longitudinal tube
into which it opens on either side of the body. A little way before
reaching the dorsal tube the transverse vessel splits into two
halves, which embrace the dorsal vessel and open separately into
the ventral vessel. This is partly shown in text-fig. 115.
We have now to deal with a series of sac-like bodies forming
closed cavities of very problematical nature, which lie in the
middle of many segments. There is by no means one of these
sacs to each segment, and thus they are very far from consti-
tuting a tube running without intermission through the body.
I compare them, however, later in this paper to a tube found in
the young buds (see p. 833). But, as a matter of fact, one of
these sacs may actually extend through two proglottids, so that
there is a hint of a formerly continuous structure such as occurs
in the buds. Asa rule, however, they appear to be limited to a
single proglottid, of which they occupy sometimes the exact centre,
at other times pushed rather to one side. They lie close to the
transverse water vascular vessel. J cannot find that these sacs
have any connection with any other spaces. They appear to be
perfectly isolated. The first of the series occurs very early in
the body—if not in the very first segment. These sacs have a
lining cuticle surrounded by a single layer of epithelial cells of
which the borders between the individual cells are not clear.
The nuclei, however, are very obvious and large. There are no
muscle-fibres at all apparent encircling the sacs. They often
appear crumpled in transverse sections, and occasionally seem
to be Y-shaped. They are impossible to miss in a series of
sections.
The only remaining characteristic of this worm upon which I
am able to report is the structure of the ‘“‘ head” end of the body,
which has been already briefly described above. In the place of
a scolex there is a small projecting process, no larger than the
rostellar process of many unarmed tapeworms. ‘This arises from
the middle of what may be termed, for the present, the first seg-
ment of the body, which is distinguished from those that follow
by its rather less breadth and greater length. It would seem to
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 831
be really composed of two segments, if we consider the condition
of the water vascular system therein. The two main longitudinal
vessels of this system extend well forwards into this compound
segment, and the outer ventral vessels are connected by two
transverse vessels, thus indicating, as I suggest, the double
nature of this apparently single segment. Towards the centre
of the specialised anterior segment is a large group of deeply-
pigmented oval bodies, which appear to be special pigment-cells.
They are as large, or nearly so, as the calcareous corpuscles which
are very abundant in this worm. In the middle of the concave
anterior border of these two fused segments is quite a small
conical projection, than which nothing else at all comparable to
a scolex exists. There is no sign of any breakage at the summit
of this which might suggest that a scolex had been accidentally
detached.
It is a somewhat remarkable fact that these conditions (or, at
any rate, something very near to them) occur in the genus
Dioicocestus; for, as will be pointed out later, the genus with
which I am concerned in the present paper shows some likeness
to the Acoleide and even to the genus Dioicocestus, which is of
that family. In Dioicocestus acotylus, Fuhrmann * has described
and figured the practical absence of suckers and the very rudi-
mentary condition of the rostellum—a state of affairs which is
not found in the other species of this genus. The figure referred
to also shows—as I have described in my species—the absence
of any marked diminution in calibre of the body at the head end.
But it must be remembered that the Diotcocestus was a fully-
developed sexual worm.
§ Structure of the Buds.
It now remains to consider the minute anatomy of these out-
growths and their nature. As to the latter query, there are, as
it appears to me, only two alternatives. These outgrowths must
be either “tentacles” of the nature of the processes known in
Hymenolepis villosus, or young worms budded off from the
parent stock. There is very little, if indeed anything, to be
said in favour of the former view. It is true that a large out-
growth of the body to form a tentacle might have very much the
same structure as the body, even to possessing branches of the
excretory system and lateral nerve-cords. But there would
hardly be a practical identity of structure such as I shall point
out in detail later. Furthermore, the growth of processes of the
body might be expected to be more regular than are these out-
growths (cf. text-fig. 113), and above all a gradual freeing of
themselves from firm contact with the body, as shown in the
figure, is precisely what we should expect with budding offspring,
which, as it appears to me, is the obvious and only way to in-
terpret these appendages of the fully grown worm.
* Zool. Jahrb., Abth. f. Syst. Bd. xx. 1904, p. 131.
832 DR. F, E. BEDDARD ON A
I selected for investigation, by means of transverse sections,
the most adult-looking of the young budded-off worms, in which,
moreover, segmentation was obvious. I have already referred to
this individual in my account of the budding process and need
not redescribe its external characters here. The wider end
attached to the body of the parent forms a bladder with rather
thick walls. ‘This I take, therefore, to be the posterior end of
the young worm. The opposite end is very much thinner (as 1s,
of course, usual among tapeworms) and represents the scolex end
of the animal. I could observe no trace of hooks anywhere on
this scolex, nor suckers of any kind. This, however, is not sur-
prising in view of what I have already described in considering
the conditions observable in the parent stock. At about the
middle of the worm a transverse section shows the appearances
represented in text-fig. 116. The cortical layer is thick—about
the same diameter, or in places rather more than the diameter,
of the medullary region. The inedullary region is plainly marked
off from the cortical by transverse muscular fibres of delicate
constitution.
There are several parallel fibres in this layer, which is altogether
of some width, the individual fibres being widely separated. The
parenchyma of the medullary region is as usual, and contains
many nucleated cells, generally triangular in form, connected
with processes at the angles. These cells get to be particularly
numerous near the water vascular tubes, which will be referred
to later. There are also heaps of nuclei visible in some sections,
which I take to be the rudiments of the sexual organs. To one
side of the body the medullary region seems at first sight to be
invaded, as it were, by the cortical region, thus producing an
asymmetry in the transver se section, which i 18 quite apparent in
the accompanying text-figure. This asymmetry is associated with
the presence of a tubular organ (text-fig. 116, «), which will be
described in detail on a subsequent page. ‘This occupies a good
deal of space, and round it are large bundles of stout muscular
fibres, quite similar to those which occur in the cortical layer.
It is very easy, however, to observe that the transverse layer of
muscles bounding the medullary parenchyma is continued on
either side of this differentiated mass of tissue and ends laterally
at a point asymmetrical with its ending on the other side of the
body. I therefore regard this region as belonging to the medullary
part of the body. The cortical region is distinguished from the
medullary (other than that section of the medullary region just
5
referred to) by the bundles of stout longitudinally running fibres.
These bundles form a layer Sounve Eavielr outside of the transverse
fibres; but there are much smaller bundles and isolated longi-
tudinal fibres extending some way towards the exterior of the
body.
In the medullary region lie the water vascular tubes and the
nervous system. All of these lie in the same straight line with
each other and with the tubular organ already referred to, and
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 833
this line is the longer diameter of the cross-section ; the tubes
ete. are thus laterally disposed with regard to each other. It is
necessary to emphasise what may appear to be a statement of the
obviously true, since in other regions of the body the mutual
relationships of these several organs and systems are a little
changed,
Text-fig. 116.
Transverse section through middle of strobila of oldest bud of the asexual
form of Urocystidiwm gemmiparum.
lv. Eixeretory tubes. 2. Nerve-cord. «x. Tube of doubtful significance
described in text.
In all other tapeworms known to me the water vascular tubes
of the two sides of the body are symmetrical with each other in
point of position within the medulla and distance from the lateral
cortex on either side, They are also generally correspondent in
size, though not always regularly so throughout the whole body,
In the present species the water vascular tubes are asymmetrical in
both these particulars. The tube of the one side is considerably
834 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
larger than that of the other and is relatively asymmetrically
placed. ‘This latter fact is doubtless due to the bundles of longi-
_ tudinal fibres surrounding the large lateral tubular organ. This
structure has, as it were, pushed the nerve-cord and the water
vascular tube of its side towards the centre of the body. Indeed,
the vessel in question lies very nearly in the actual centre of the
section and quite in this position shortly before and during its
connection by the transverse vessel with the tube of the opposite
side of the body. These transverse vessels are at regular intervals
and quite easy to see as in the adult worm. I did not observe
any other branches of the water vascular tubes than these.
These sections from the middle of the body of the young worm
also show very plainly the remarkable constitution of the nervous
system in this Cestode. One of the two lateral cords (text-
fig. 116, 2) is very obvious indeed, lying between the water vascular
tube of that side and the tubular organ of doubtful meaning.
It cannot possibly be missed in these sections. But on the opposite
side of the body I could find no trace whatever of any nerve-cord
even of smaller size than the one represented in the text-figure.
I feel confident that a failure to observe a cord in this situation,
were it present, would be difficult. The medullary tissue is so
clearly differentiated by the stain (iron hematoxylin*) that
the nerve-cord, if of any size at all comparable to that of the
opposite side of the body, would stand out quite prominently.
This state of affairs is undoubtedly very anomalous and hard of
explanation. For we shall see later that the two nerve-cords are
both quite recognisable towards the end of the body.
Finally, this transverse section shows to one side a large tube
cut across, to which reference has been made incidentally once or
twice already. It is situated in the centre of a group of bundles
of longitudinal fibres, which bundles are like those in the cortical
layer of the body in every way, including their rather sparse
scattering round the centrally placed tube. The bundles in the
cortical layer are not densely pressed together as they are, for
example, in Dasyurotenia robustat. ‘The tube itself is of con-
siderable size and is lined by a thick layer of chitin, which is
stained precisely like the chitin which covers the body of the
worm externally. Outside of this is a single layer of stout longi-
tudinal muscle-fibres, and then a deeply staining layer of elongated
cells, interspersed among which are small bundles of stout longi-
tudinal fibres. The structure of the tube is in fact almost exactly
that of the outer layer of the body, only differing, indeed, by the
intercalation of the groups of stout longitudinal fibres among
the cells.
We shall now consider the course and structure of this tubular
organ throughout the body of the young worm. The identity of
structure with the outer layer of the body which this tube
shows in the middle region of the body, is rendered intelligible
* I am indebted to Dr. Plimmer, F.R.S., for the use of this reagent.
+ See Beddard, P. Z.S. 1912, p. 684, text-fig. 97, lm.
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 835
by the fact that in two places, one behind the other, it communi-
cates with the exterior by a narrow duct (text-fig. 117), One of
Text-fig. 117.
Two consecutive sections from another region of the same bud as that which is
represented in text-figure 116, to illustrate the opening of the tube a on tothe
exterior.
In the upper figure the orifice (0.) on to the exterior is shown and the
commencement of the invagination leading towards the tube x.
Tn the lower figure the outgrowth of the tube a to meet the invagination is seen.
mn, Nerve-cord. 7.v. Water vascular tubes,
836 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
these openings is in the bladder region and the anterior one a
very little way in front of this. Both orifices are dorsal or ventral*
in position—at any rate not lateral,—but they do not coincide
exactly. In view of the position of these orifices it is clear that
the tube of communication is of some length. In addition to
these two openings on to the external surface, the tube gives off
two short cecal processes, one of which nearly but not quite
opens into the bladder.
Anteriorly the tube gradually comes to an end and does not
end by opening on to the exterior, It diminishes in calibre for
the space of a few sections and then simply ends. At the bladder
end of the body—the end which is attached to the parent stock—
the tube gets to be more and more shoved to the side as the
bladder increases in size. In consequence also of this the tube
becomes flattened from side to side, at the anterior part of the
bladder. Followed backwards this tube can be recognised by its
thick chitinous Jining, already referred to, and can be seen
thereby to be quite distinct from the excretory tube which has
come to lie below it in consequence also of the development of
the bladder region, The next that occurs is that the tube divides
into two coincidently with the formation of two or three septa,
partly dividing up the cavity of that part of the bladder which
lies adjacent. The two tubes lie one dorsally to the other, and
thus both of them in the same straight line with the excretory
tube. The middle tube of the two after a very short course
appears to open into one of the chambers of the bladder, and is
thus a diverticulum like the one mentioned above. Furthermore,
I am not absolutely certain that it actually opens into the
bladder ; but it ends at least in close contact.
I feel, indeed, almost inclined to assert that this tube does
open into the cavity of the bladder, since the main tube, continu-
ing a little way further back, gets very narrow and undoubtedly
ends by opening into the bladder. It is to be noted that these
orifices do not involve a mere continuity of lumen. The character
of the lining membranes changes at the point of meeting. It
is further to be noted that it is not the main cavity of the
bladder into which the tube opens, but into a portion of it,
separated off by septa. This problematical tube varies in parts
in its structure and in its relations to the nerve-cord. Anteriorly
the layer of cells surrounding it are not so conspicuous as
elsewhere, and thus the longitudinal muscular fibres come into
greater prominence; the calibre of the tube also is not the same
all through the body. It has been mentioned that in a section
from about the middle of the body, that the tube lies outside
of the nerve-cord and quite laterally to it. In other parts of the
body, particularly anteriorly, the tube lies above (or, perhaps it
may prove necessary to say, below 7) the nerve-cord.
We have, therefore, in these young worms still attached to the
* T cannot differentiate between the dorsal and ventral surfaces.
+ See footnote above.
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 837
parent, though (as the narrow stallx shows) just ready for detach-
ment, a tube of the structure of the outer layer of the body
which traverses in a straight line nearly the whole of the body,
which opens into the bladder behind and has two segmentally-
arranged orifices of communication with the external world.
There is no obvious answer to the question as to its nature. In
buds within the cyst of Hchinococcus* a cavity is formed which
is not an ingrowth of the cavity of the whole cyst, but which
is alleged to be continuous up to the scolex. This, however,
has been denied and the scolex asserted to be entirely solid. But
even supposing a comparison is possible on the grounds that
the scolex of Hcehinococcus is hollow, the short tubes leading to
the exterior in the worm of which the present paper contains
an account would seem to invalidate it. And, moreover, the
structure of this problematical tube is not that of the bladder
with which it communicates. It seems, indeed, to be a special
structure and not a space connected in any way (or, rather, any
direct way) with an evagination of the scolex.
For the greater part of the body I could only find a nerve-cord
on one side, where it was quite as obvious as in the “‘adult ” worm.
In the anterior region, however, the nerve-cord of the opposite
side was visible for a short space. It was, however, not half the
size of its fellow, though of precisely the same structure and
equally unmistakable as a nerve-cord. Both cords lie in the
medullary region just at its bordering on the corticallayer. I could
find no enlargement of the nature of a brain. Quite anteriorly, as
well as posteriorly in the bladder region, I could not recognise a
nerve-cord. It is noteworthy that the asymmetry of the two
water vascular tubes in size is exactly paralleled by that of the
two nerve-cords.
These are the facts which I have ascertained in the anatomy of
the most mature of the growing buds. It now remains to compare
the structure of the young worm with that of the parent stock of
which it is a bud.
§ Comparison of Bud with Parent Worm.
In the general form of the body and in the possession of a
relatively small bladder they agree; also the rudimentary scolex
is a marked feature of both young and old.
Tt is rather remarkable to find asymmetry in the young
worm, but this of course may be its normal method of growth.
Certainly I noticed no asymmetry in the parent form. What
is perhaps important as a difference is the presence of only two
water vascular tubes in the young and four of these in the
older worm. The additional water vascular tubes may, however,
make their appearance later. Furthermore, for the same
reason, too much stress cannot be laid upon the more copious
* Bronn’s Thierreichs, iv. Abth. 1B, p. 1549.
Proc. Zoou, Soc.—1912, No. LVI. 56
838 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
bundles of longitudinal muscular fibres which are to be noted in
the large worm. I believe also that the continuous large tube in
the immature worm is represented by the cavities contained in
many of the segments of the adult worm, though the minute
structure, it must be confessed, differs in the two cases. Further-
more, the series of cavities in the adult worm lie very nearly in
the middle of the body, indeed quite in the middle of the body in
some segments; the tube in the young worm is, on the other hand,
as distinctly to one and the same side. But it must be borne in
mind that the position does vary in the young worm, and a further
flattening of its body might easily cause a greater similarity in
the position of the tube to that observable in the more fully
mature worm,
§ Comparison with other Forms and Systematic
Position of the Parasite.
Apart from the question of proliferation by budding, to which
we shall return later, this Tapeworm presents a certain number
of undoubted resemblances to Cysticercus fasciolaris (of rats and
mice, etc.), which becomes Tenia crassicollis in the Cat. Both
these forms agree (I have compared the species which forms the
subject of the present paper with examples of the Cysticercus from
the common rat) in possessing a long segmented body and a small
bladder posteriorly. But in Cysticercus fasciolaris the bladder is
smaller and the body shorter than in my species, while the hooked
and suckered anterior end renders any confusion or detailed
comparison impossible. Nevertheless, the two forms have in
common the small bladder and long strobila. But while the one
occupies the position in the body of its host of asexual worm, 7. e.
in a diverticulum of the alimentary tract, the other is found, as
are Cysticerci, encysted, and in the liver of its intermediate host.
Nor is it by any means certain that the species from the Mus-
quash is a member of the Teenioidea (Cyclophyllidea) at all. It
may well be a member of one of the lower groups of Cestodes.
We shall consider the arguments for and against the placing of
the worm among the Teenioidea.
It must be admitted at once that there are no absolutely con-
clusive arguments which point definitely one way or the other.
This, of course, may be explained on the assumption that we are
dealing here with quite a new typeof Cestode. In the meantime,
the structure of the worm so far as it can be read does not favour
such an assumption, though it does not, for the matter of that,
appear to be necessarily contradictory of this possible view. As to
the other alternatives, the absence of a marked scolex with suckers
is greatly against the reference of the worm to the Tenias, but
the character of the terminal bladder, on the other hand, is on the
whole in favour of such a placing. This latter fact is obviously
against the supposition that the worm is a Plerocercoid of any
kind; but the lack of a definite “head” is as clearly in favour of
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 839
this supposition. There, as it appears to me, the question must be
left—in regrettable uncertainty.
The process of asexual reproduction by budding which this
worm shows is not entirely unknown among the Cestoidea, but
there are some not unimportant differences from what has been
recorded in other forms. There are two principal comparisons to
be made.
The first of these is with Cysticercus longicollis, the bladder-
worm of Zeenia crassiceps. It is of further interest from the
point of view of the present comparison to note that this Cysticercus
is also found in a Rodent, Arvicola arvalis. Besides the earlier
investigators, Prof. M. Braun* has studied this form and em-
bodied his results in brief in Bronn’s ‘ Thierreichs’ +. The buds
from the Cysticerci do not apparently {contain a prolongation of
the bladder-cavity, ‘“‘sondern durchweg als solide Wucherungen
der peripheren Schicht der Wand entstehen.” This is an obvious
point of similarity with my species, where, of course, the buds
cannot be continuous with the cavity of the bladder—that is to
say, in both cases the buds are solid outgrowths. Furthermore,
before being separated off from the parent Cysticercus the attach-
ment of the bud dwindles to a narrow stalk precisely as I have
described above. The buds, however, in the case of Cysticercus
longicollis seem to be limited to the bladder and always to the
hinder end of that; whereas in my species this is exactly the
region where no buds are formed.
I believe, however, that a nearer approximation to the condition
observable in the species which I describe in the present paper is
offered by a worm recently described by Tjima { with some detail.
This is a Plerocercus or Plerocercoid found parasitic in a human
being in Japan in cysts in the skin. It appears to give off actual
buds, which are, however, more or less irregularly arranged and
present nothing of the comparative symmetry manifested in the
species from Miber zibethicus. ‘The individuals differ in the degree
of their budding, some giving off a large series of slender pro-
cesses. These buds are, as in my species, actual outgrowths of the
parent stock and not, for instance, connected with the excretory
organs or any other definite part of the body. They occur
as much at the head end as elsewhere and there differ from the
Tapeworm of Wiber zibethicus. ‘There is, however, a resemblance,
in that in both cases the more mature buds are not in front of
or behind the less mature: there is a complete irregularity in
their order of succession.
The similarity between the two cases of budding cannot, how-
ever, be carried into any detail, since it is obvious that the two
worms are not nearly allied. The Plerocercoid described by
* See Centralbl. f. Bakt. u. Par. xx. 1896, p. 580; Zool. Anz. 1896, No. 514; ibid.
1897, No. 521. These papers are not illustrated.
+ Bd. iv. Abth. 1B, p. 1529.
£ “ On a new Cestode Larva parasitic in Man,” Journ. Coll. Sci. Japan, xx. 1905.
For a reference to this paper I am indebted to Dr. W. Nicoll.
56*
840 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
Tjima is regarded by him—and, as I think, rightly—as a young
Bothriocephalid whose larval stages are also known from similar
positions in other mammals than man. These larve have no
bladder, and thus the fact that in the Plerocercoid, as in my
worm, the buds are produced from the general body surface loses
its principal significance. It is, | think, more important to note
that the worm from Viber zibethicus differs from Cysticercus
longicollis, in that the budding is not upon the bladder end of the
worm. It is remarkable, however, that both in my worm and in
the Plerocercoid there is no recognisable scolex ; but at the same
time there is in the supposed young Bothriocephalid no proper
segmentation of the body as yet visible. It is thus particularly
remarkable that my species is very fully segmented throughout.
I think, therefore, that the case of budding which I bring forward
in the present paper may be regarded as in some respects a new
form of asexual reproduction which is partly paralleled in a few
other forms of Tapeworms.
Inasmuch as the propagation of this worm is different in detail
from anything that is known, and as the worm itself does not
entirely conform with any known species or genus, it is desirable,
as I think, for mere convenience sake to give it a name and to
define as far as may be the characters of the Cestode. Had the
worm proved definitely a Tetracotylean*, I should have con-
tented myself with referring it temporarily to the genus “ Tenia,”
a name which is generally given to forms whose generic affinities
are uncertain. As, however, this cannot be done with any
certainty, I venture to give a new generic name which is non-
committal as to its position in the series, and I term it
accordingly
Urocystidium gemmiparum, gen. et sp. n.
Incompletely mature worm with small bladder and very numerous
proglottids. Scolea feebly developed and without hooks. Tubes of
water vascular system lateral to cach other, the dorsal with thick
muscular coat and inside of ventral, the ventrals connected by a trans-
verse vessel which forks and surrounds dorsal vessel ; a network present
in cortex as well as in medullary region. Longitudinal musele-
layer in cortex of at least two rows of bundles with numerous fibres
in each. Buds formed at hinder end of body on both sides, thus
forming two rows, of which the bladders are attached to the parent
stock ; the scolex is not inverted, is without hooks, and rudimentary.
Hab. Musquash (Fiber zibethicus), in liver-duct.
(2) THE Sexvat Form.
As has been already mentioned, the hepatic duct contained
besides the ‘“ cysticercoid” just described a sexual worm which I
__* Lthink it necessary to maintain an attitude of reserve with respect to the
identity of the asexual and sexual forms.
—
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 841
believe to be the mature form of the same Tapeworm. The size of
the two worms was about the same. The sexual form measured
86 mm. in length and the greatest diameter, which occurred not
Text-fig. 118.
The sexual form of Urocystidiwm gemmiparum (P).
The left-hand figure represents the entire worm magnified about twice; the right-
hand figure represents the scolex with a double crown of hooks more highly
magnified.
far behind the head, was6 mm, The appearance of the worm
(text-fig. 118) was quite similar to that of the immature form. It
842, DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
was posteriorly of a rather delicate appearance, rather translucent,
and the proglottids were very short and enormously wide in
proportion. There was no increase in length of the proglottids
towards the end of the body, and their proportions were as in the
asexual worm. It would hardly, of course, be sufficient to insist
upon an identity upon these grounds alone; but, taken in con-
junction with other facts which will be dealt with, the similarity
in outward appearance is very striking. ‘The “tail” end of the
body appeared to be a little excavated, as is common in tapeworms,
the penultimate segments slightly embracing the last segment,
which was not quite so wide. I can believe that the worm was
proliferating at this end.
The scolex was not quite so wide as the ensuing strobila, and no
appreciable neck separated the two. The scolex is proportionately
large, as is indicated in the accompanying text-figure (text-fig.
118), and well armed anteriorly with two rows of hooks alter-
nating in position. The anterior circle of hooks consisted of 16
separate hooks, which were about twice the size of those of the
succeeding circle, whose number I did not count, but which were
presumably the same, as they were implanted between the larger
hooks. The usual four suckers are present; they show no un-
usual features and are unarmed ; their cavity looks forwards.
I have investigated the internal structure by means of trans-
verse and sagittal sections. The cortical layer does not differ
greatly from the medullary layer in thickness, and the general
appearance of the sections is very like that of sections of the
immature worm (see text-fig. 119). The cortex, for example, is
identical or nearly so. The same bundles of longitudinal fibres
occur and are very much of the same thickness. They are also
separated from the medulla by transversely running fibres. I
have described and figured in the asexual form the bundle or
bundles of rather stouter longitudinal fibres running outside of
the nerve-cord on either side and associated with a cavity dubiously
related to the excretory system. I find the same arrangement in
the sexual worm.
The excretory system does not needa very long description,
since it agrees in its main peculiarities with that of the supposed
asexual form. There are, in fact, the same two lateral vessels on
either side lying parallel to each other. They are, moreover,
roughly equisized, and the innermost of the two has very thick
muscular walls, the fibres being circular in their disposition. I
should add that nuclei interspersed among these fibres were very
obvious. In addition to these two longitudinal trunks each pro-
glottid possesses a transverse vessel which has the same remarkable
mode of union with the ventral excretory tube that I have figured
(see text-fig. 115) and described (see p. 830) in the presumed
Cysticercoid stage, and which I need not redescribe here as the
structure seems to be identical. There is, however, one important
difference which the sexual form shows from the Cysticercoid ; and
that is the absence in the former of the peripheral water vascular
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM, 843
network of the latter. I could find no trace of this in the sexual
worm, although it was easy to see in the supposed Cysticercoid of
the same. Tt seems to me possible (perhaps necessary) to explain
this difference by assuming in the Cysticercoid a retention and
gradual metamorphosis of the bladder into the strobila, together
with its excretory system, which latter ultimately disappears on
the assumption of sexual characters. There are, of course, other
Cestodes in which the bladder is not cast off before the acquiring
of sexual characters.
Text-fig. 119.
ee
se
wen
<
ae
s
BRE
eo
ee
fs
Bes
Part of a transverse section through a proglottid of the sexual worm.
e.m. Circular muscles. d.v. Dorsal vessel of the water vascular system. N. The
three laterally running nerve-cords. ¢.v. Transverse water vascular trunk,
v.v. Ventral trunk. X. Large longitudinal muscular fibres referred to in the
text as frequently running within a space.
In the neighbourhood of the water vascular trunks delicate muscular fibres are
shown running chiefly in a dorso-ventral direction, which may be associated with
the dilation and contraction of the water vascular tubes.
The nerve-cord shows no trace of the asymmetry which I have
described above in the very young worms. There is nothing un-
usual about the position or structure of the main trunks. There
844 DR. F, E. BEDDARD ON A
is, however, on either side of the body and running parallel with
the main nerve-cord a second and a third nerve-cord (see text-
fig. 119, N) which lie above and below the former and at some
distance from it. These accessory nerve-cords appear to be
exactly like the main nerve-cord in structure and are situated
atthe boundary of the medullary and cortical regions, a trifle
nearer to the middle of the segment. In sagittal sections the
supplementary nerve-cord is very obvious and is seen to be con-
nected with the main trunk by numerous (7 or 8) transverse
cords in each segment, which produce a ladder-like appearance.
There is an obvious likeness here to Bertiella, in which genus the
nerve-cord also consists of three separate strands, and to Dioico-
cestus, where the cords are wider apart. ‘They are, however, much
closer together in Bertiella than in the present worm. I have
not observed this arrangement of three nerve-cords in the supposed
immature form already described. But it is to be observed that
the main cord is there almost as wide as the medulla, thus leaving
no room for the accessory cords which may be split off later.
§ Sexual Organs.
In the middle region of the body and possibly for some way in
front (1 have not examined sections just in front of the mid-
region) the proglottids are full of ripe eggs. I have examined
these proglottids in sagittal as well as in transverse sections. The
former bring out the important fact that there is apparently no
internal boundary-line between the proglottids ; for the eggs form
continuous masses stretching without intermission from segment
to segment. In this region the most careful search failed to show
any other genital organs than these exceedingly numerous ripe
ova. It is, of course, not uncommon in fully mature segments
of tapeworms, such as these in the present form, to find nothing
but ova in the medulla; but in those forms there are at least
considerable though often altered remains of the genital ducts
and terminal apparatus. In the present species there is no
vestige of cirrus-sac or vagina and not the least trace that I
could discover of an external pore. Nor do I think that it would
have been easy to have missed these structures were they present,
particularly in a series of sagittal sections. J am, in fact, con-
vinced that they are absent.
The eggs of this tapeworm do not lie in any space or spaces
that can be strictly called a uterus. There are, however, spaces
which suggest the remains of the uterus. These are not arranged
in strict metamerism; but in a certain number of proglottids,
and not by any means confined to a single proglottid, are large
cavities such as is represented in the accompanying text-figure
(text-fig. 120). These cavities are more or less circular and lhe
in the medullary region of the body. As a matter of fact,
they are not at all full of eggs. Indeed, they are often quite
empty; only sometimes are eggs to be seen lying within them
es
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 845
Text-fig. 120.
Two sections through portions of proglottids of the sexual worm.
The upper figure is a longitudinal section in the more anterior part of the body,
showing the smaller ova lying among and to the inside of the longitudinal
muscles (J.); these smaller ova lie in what is probably generative tissue, not
clearly indicated in the drawing.
¢. Transverse muscle fibres. o. Mature ova scattered through medulla and
also at the opposite side of the figure in the cortex.
The lower figure represents a transverse section through a more posteriorly situated
segment.
c. A cavity which may possibly represent a uterus; two spaces are shown in the
cortex which may or may not belong to the same category. 7. Longitudinal
muscles, o. Ripe ova showing a nucleus. ¢. Transverse muscles.
846 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
and adherent to their walls. I doubt, therefore, whether these
Spaces are the remains of the uterus, or whether they are not
rather cavities which have arisen in the medullary region perhaps
by stretching of the walls of the body and consequent laceration.
The eggs, in fact, lie scattered through the parenchyma, some-
times singly and more often in masses of various sizes, as is
shown in the figure referred to. The eggs are not limited
to the medullary region. It is clearly to be observed that
they extend into the cortex (text-figs. 120, 121) a good way
Text-fig. 121.
sue
38 ! :
See gata *
ohh. elk
Pay sept oN
en
+ RA WRNBG, Saks
PO Sgiseem cal mp CS
ae
Met Sheet Leary
Seer AE ALTE
Part of a transverse section through a proglottid of the sexually mature worm in
which the ripe ova (0.) have been very deeply stained and are seen to be
scattered through the cortex as well as the medulla.
1. Longitudinal muscles. ¢. Transverse muscles.
towards the external layer of the body-wall. They stop short,
however, some way below it. It is quite certain that whether
or no there may be remains of the uterus, some of the eggs lie
scattered within the parenchyma, In the cortical parenchyma
they are to be seen between the muscle-bundles and closely packed
in masses. ‘The appearance is, indeed, not at all unlike that
which I have recently described in the tapeworm Anoplotenia
dasyuri * in those parts where the cavities of the uterus were
not so conspicuous; for in the latter worm there are uterine
* P.Z.S. 1911, p. 1012, text-fig. 213.
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 847
cavities lodging many, perhaps most, of the eggs. The present
species is, as it were, a stage beyond that exhibited by Anoplo-
tenia dasyuri. As is well known, the imbedding of the eggs in
the parenchyma is not a novelty; for Oochoristica is a genus
which is largely characterised by this very feature, though in
this case the eggs are imbedded singly and there are not the
heaps of eggs seen in the present species and perhaps in Ano-
plotenia. In Anoplotenia, however, the masses of eggs are
usually in cavities of the uterus. In both Oochoristica and Ano-
ploteenia, however, the scattered eggs are limited to the medullary
region. But the peculiarity of the species with which I am
dealing in the present paper is also known in other forms. Clerc *
has figured eggs in the cortical region in a species of Dilepis.
I have some reason to think that the scattered eggs lie in
the interstices of the network forming the ground-tissue of the
worm; but in any case eggs were also seen lying in larger
circular cavities. I believe that these cavities (shown in text-
fig. 120) are not the remains of a uterus. They are, as it
appears to me, to be directly compared with similar spaces to be
seen in mature (but less mature than in the present instance)
segments of Jnermicapsifer, where 1 have described and figured
them?. In this latter case I was able to bring forward some
positive evidence to show that the spaces in question were not,
and could not be, the isolated series of chambers left by a
vanishing uterus. In the worm with which I am dealing in the
present communication I am unable to furnish any of those
proofs of the nature of the cavities in question. I can merely
point out their general similarity to those of /nermicapsifer.
Although there were no traces of gonads like those of other
tapeworms in this region of the body, I have succeeded in dis-
covering what I regard as undoubtedly the generative tissue.
The medulla was packed with ripe ova, which, as already said,
stray into the cortical layers lying between the bundles of
muscles. But at the line of junction of the cortex and medulla
and lying in the latter is a continuous mass of tissue with
interspersed nuclei, in and just outside of which eggs in various
stages of development are to be seen. This is, as I think,
undoubtedly to be regarded as a continuous layer of gonadial
tissue. I cannot see any other obvious explanation of it. It is
clearly totally unlike the ground-tissue of the tapeworm’s body
and forms a solid mass with darkly staining nuclei. Its associa-
tion with developing ova seems to be final in the matter of
argument. It is, however, possibly the case that this gonadial
tissue is wholly or in part the origin of spermatozoa also; for
testes like those of other tapeworms were not found in the
present species. I have, however, no evidence of the presence of
spermatozoa. The tissue itself is—save where developing ova
* Rev. Zool. Suisse, t. xi. 1908, pl. xi. figs. 75, 76.
+ P. Z.S. 1912, p. 588, text-fig. 77. For the opposite view, see Janicki, Denkschr.
Med.-Nat. Ges. Jena, xvi. (1911) p. 381, pl. xiv. figs. 25-27.
848 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON A
are present—naturally indistinctive. The only way of proving
its testicular nature is the discovery of spermatozoa, An _
inability to find these is not of itself conclusive proof of the
absence of testicular tissue. But an argument of weight in this
direction is to be derived from a study of the ripe eggs. These
are rather small as compared with some species and possess a
very thick hyaline shell, which is with difficulty penetrated by
staining reagents. Thus in many of my sections the eggs seem
to be simply oval structureless bodies. In cases, however, where
the staining has been more successful the true ovum within the
shell becomes obvious. It consists of a single cell with a large
nucleus. I say a single cell because there are not vitelline cells
enclosed within the shell, anything in the nature of a vitelline
body being completely absent. The absence of a vitelline gland
is rare among tapeworms, but is known in the genus called
on that very account Avitellina*. In no case did I find this
ovum in course of division—and I have examined a large
number of individual ova in many segments. I infer, therefore,
that no spermatozoa are formed in this individual worm and
furthermore that there is no entry of spermatozoa from another
individual—a fact which is also supported by the absence of a
vagina. But it must be remembered that the host may not
have contained in the bile-ducts another sperm-producing indi-
vidual. It may be that fertilisation occurs outside the body.
But this is clearly a mere suggestion for the present, though
not repugnant to such evidence as there is.
There being no trace of the actual uterus in the middle
region of the body, I naturally sought for these bodies elsewhere
and made a series of sections from the anterior region of the
body. I selected the rather thicker region which immediately
follows the head and examined a piece cut from about 10 mm.
behind the anterior extremity. Here, as I imagined, the:im-
mature uterus might be found or at any rate some trace of its
existence. I could, however, find in this part no essential
differences from the posterior region of the body which has just
been described. ‘The body was in the same way packed in places
with the ripe ova, which were present everywhere in a less crowded
state; indeed, they seemed to me to occur nearer to the external
surface here than posteriorly. I found the eggs only just beneath
the external cellular layer of the body-wall. The only conclusion
that I can come to is that this worm possesses no uterus, or
that it exists for a very transitory period only, and also that very
possibly the sexes are separated as in the genus Diotcocestus.
The specimen described here being a female, this conclusion
is obviously based upon negative evidence only and is thus less
valuable. It is, however, quite clear to my mind that the genera-
tive products develop simultaneously in the proglottids and that
* See Gough, Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci. vol. lvi. pt. 2, 1911, for an account of this
genus.
b=)
NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM. 849
therefore there is no growth of the worm when it has arrived
at sexual maturity. This conclusion, which fits the facts that I
am able to set forth, agrees also, it may be pointed out, with the
very worm-like cysticercoid stage. There is, so to speak, not
much necessity for this immature worm to grow in length before
assuming the sexual condition. Far otherwise is it with the
typical Cysticerci, which are provided with but short strobila
as compared with the mature forms of their species. There is
at the very least a relation between the two series of facts which
is worth noting. It seems to me to be furthermore likely that
at no period are there sexual ducts developed—at any rate, no
female ducts. This latter circumstance, if true, is not new; for
the absence of a female orifice has been asserted in more than
one genus of worms belonging to more than one family.
Aporina among the Anoplocephalidze and many genera among
the Acoleide are instances to the point. It is mainly, indeed,
the plain absence of a cirrus-sac which leads me to believe that
this worm possesses a dicecious habit so rare in this group.
§ General Résumé and Systematic Position.
It is, I think, obvious from the foregoing account of the
sexual form of this worm that it is the representative of a new
genus which differs in a good many particulars from any known
form. It will be convenient to give a short résumé of the
essential characters of this worm, for which the name already
given to what I regard as the asexual form may be retained.
My reasons for retaining the name of the asexual form are
firstly that I have been able to give a more complete account
of it than of the presumed sexual form of the same Cestode,
and secondly that I cannot fully define the sexual form, concerning
whose identity with the asexual form, moreover, some doubt may
be considered to remain.
In any case the following are the principal characters of the
sexual worm :—Length 86 mm., greatest breadth 6 mm. Head
with two rows of hooks 16 in each row, the hooks of the anterior
row twice the size of those of the second row. Suckers normal
and unarmed. No neck; strobila consisting of numerous pro-
glottids very short and not appreciably longer at posterior end of
worm.
Body flat, thicker anteriorly. Cortex about the same diameter
as medulla. Two layers of bundles of longitudinal muscular
fibres in cortex. Water vascular tubes two on each side lying
side by side; dorsal (?) tube with thick muscular walls. A trans-
verse vessel in each proglottid forking round dorsal vessel to join
ventral at two points. No water vascular network present.
Nervous system consisting of a larger lateral trunk and two
smaller trunks, one dorsal and one ventral, connected by many
cords in each proglottid to main trunk. The sexes are apparently
separate or the worm is protogynous or protandrous throughout.
850 ON A NEW ASEXUAL TAPEWORM.
Female organs consist of a layer of gonadial tissue lying in the
medulla at its junction with the cortical layer from which ova are
shed into the body, which they permeate even to the outer layers of
the cortex. There is no trace of segmentally arranged gonads or of
a uterus, nor are the eggs surrounded by any kind of ‘ capsule.”
There is no vagina or female passage of any kind; the vitelline
glands are totally absent. The ripe eggs are surrounded by a
thick hyaline shell and none were observed to be dividing and
no embryos were discovered in them. ‘Thus it is possible that
fertilisation occurs outside of the body.
These characteristics do not entirely fall in with those of any
other family of tapeworms. They obviously point to an affinity
with the Acoleide, but do not definitely necessitate the inclusion
of this remarkable worm within that family.
§ Anatomical Summary.
It may be convenient to extract from the foregoing account
of this new tapeworm the more remarkable anatomical facts
which I have been able to make out.
(1) The absence of a marked scolex in the Cysticercus of a tape-
worm which cannot be placed among the Bothriocephalids
and of which therefore it would be expected that the scolex
would be very prominent. And correlated with this the
necessary assumption that, as in Bothriocephalids, the
scolex only develops part passu with the growth in maturity
of the worm.
(2) The enormous size of the strobila as compared with the
bladder—a rare condition among the Tetracotylea, but
paralleled in Cysticercus fasciolaris.
(3) The very thick layer of muscle surrounding the dorsal
vessel of the excretory system and the bifurcation of the
transverse vessels round the dorsal vessel to open into the
ventral water vascular tube.
(4) The total absence of generative ducts or (presuming that
the species is dicecious) of the female tubes, which is, so
far as I am aware, a unique anatomical character.
(5) The total absence of a uterus or of any trace thereof.
(6) The diffuse and non-metameric character of the ovaries,
which are not sharply differentiated into relatively small
bodies of a definite shape.
(7) The enormous quantity of eggs produced and their exist-
ence in quite anterior as well as posterior segments; the
eges are, moreover, found quite as abundantly in the
cortical layer as in the medulla. The conditions observable
in this part of the generative system are simply an
exaggeration of what is to be met with in other genera,
where the eggs come to be ultimately scattered through
the medullary parenchyma.
ON TWO NEW TREMATODES. 851
50. On Two new Trematode Parasites from the Indian Cobra.
By Wiuuiam Nico, M.A., D.Sc., M.D., F.Z.S., Lister
Institute of Preventive Medicine, London.
[Received May 28, 1912: Read June 4, 1912. |
(Text-figure 122.)
INDEX.
Page
Ethology: Two new Trematode parasites in the gall-bladder
and ureters of the Indian Cobra (Naja tripudians) ...... 851
Geographical Zoology : India; Cobra, two new flukes from
the gall-bladder and ureters .....................cccceseseeoeene SDL
Systematic :
Xenopharyne (gen. n., Fam. Dicrocceliide) solus, sp. n.,
from gall-bladder of Indian Cobra ....................00.... 861
Styphlodora naje, sp. n., from ureters of Indian Cobra,
closely resembles S. horrida Leidy ........................... 854
In an Indian Cobra (Waja tripudians) which died in the
Zoological Society’s Gardens on 11th October, 1911, a few speci-
mens of two interesting new Trematode parasites were found.
Of the first of these a single specimen was found in the gall-
bladder; of the second, four somewhat macerated specimens were
met with in the ureters. Four different species of Nematode
parasites were also present in the same animal, so that altogether
it was infected with six different species of parasitic worms.
The first species belongs to the family Dicrocceliid and is of
particular interest from the fact that members of this family
are not commonly found in Reptiles. Hitherto the only typicai
representative in Reptiles is that described by de Faria (1910).
The present species shows most of the characteristic features of
the family, but at the same time it exhibits several divergences of
such importance as to warrant its being regarded as the type of a
new genus. For that genus I propose the name Xenopharynx.
XENOPHARYNX SOLUS, gen. et sp.n. (Text-fig. 122, B.)
Only a single specimen was found in the gall-bladder. It
measures 4°55 mm. in length and 1°68 mm. in greatest breadth,
which is about the middle of the body. The outline is almost
elliptical and the body is fairly flat. There are no cuticular
spines.
The oral sucker has a diameter of -42 mm., but its length is
only 30 mm. The ventral sucker is circular, with a diameter of
‘41 mm. It is situated 1:13 mm. from the anterior end. The
neck is therefore almost exactly one-fourth of the body-length.
The pharynx is contiguous with the oral sucker and measures
‘22x24 mm. It possesses the curious shape shown in text-fig.
122, B. At first sight this shape was thought to be the result of
852 DR. WILLIAM NICOLL ON
unequal contraction of the pharyngeal walls or perhaps due to the
drawing of the cesophagus into the lumen of the pharynx, but
neither of these possibilities seemed to accord with experience.
The condition appears to be brought about by the thinning of the
Text-fig. 122.
M. Rhodes del.
A. Styphlodora naje, sp.n. Ventral view. x 40. C., cirrus;
Ov., ovary; R.S., receptaculum seminis.
B. Xenopharynex solus, gen. et sp.n. Ventral view. x 25.
Ov., ovary.
posterior part of the pharyngeal wall, which anteriorly is of the
usual thickness. In section the appearance is somewhat horse-
shoe-shaped. It is unfortunate that no second specimen was
TWO NEW TREMATODES. 853
available for comparison. Following the pharynx, and aboyt as
long as it, is a wide cesophagus, which bifuycates about midway
between the pharynx and the ventral sucker, The diverticula are
fairly uniform, but become somewhat sinugus towards their ter-
mination, which is ‘45 mm, from the end of the body.
The excretory vesicle is Y-shaped, with a long median stem
reaching the middle of the body and two short limbs, the left of
which extends as far forward as the left testis, Owing to the
fact that sections could not be made, it was impossible to determine
whether Odhner’s view with regard to the shape of the excretory
vesicle in the Dicrocceliidze holds good in this case. To all
appearance, however, the paired limbs are part of the vesicle,
Their walls stand out as distinctly, and are abont the same
thickness, as those of the main stem,
The testes lie not far behind the ventral sucker, They are two
transversely oval bodies, separated from each other by a distance
equal to their diameter, They are situated obliquely, the right
being about half a diameter in advance of the left, and being
separated from the ventral sucker by a similar distance. They
measure ‘31 mm, in transverse diameter, The cirrus-pouch is of
small size and lies entirely in front of the yentral sucker, It
measures *29 x :13 mm., and contains a small convoluted vesicula
seminalis, a comparatively long pars prostatica, and a short narrow
ductus ejaculatorius, The genital aperture is median, just over
the intestinal bifureation.
The ovary lies a considerable distance behind the testes, about
midway between them and the end of the body. It is on the
right side overlying the right intestinal diverticulum, Its outline
is transversely oval and it is much Jarger than the testes,
measuring 31 x°47 mm. There appears to be no receptaculum
seminis, or if present it is obscured by the uterus, The yolk-
glands are situated chiefly in the neck, the sides of which they
almost completely fill. They extend on each side from the oral
sucker to well behind the ventral sucker, but they are more ex-
tensive on the left than on the right. On the right they stop at
the level of the bifurcation of the excretory vesicle, although
there are a coupie of small follicles near the ovary. On the left
they extend slightly beyond the level of the ovary, In the neck
the follicles spread well in towards the mid-line of the body, but
behind the ventyal sucker they lie entirely to the outer side of the
intestinal diverticula. The transverse yolk-ducts cross the body
about the level of the testes, and the shell-gland les just behind
the right testis,
The uterus is moderately voluminous and is thrown inta
irregular narrow convolutions, It does not extend much behind
the ovary, but in front it overlaps the intestinal diverticula, and
winding between the testes it passes forward on the left side of
the ventral sucker and makes a few short turns in front of the
sucker before passing into the short vagina. The eggs are small
and numerous, measuring *036—-039 x 018-019 mm.
Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1912, No. LVITI. 57
854 DR. WILLIAM NICOLL ON
The new species differs from all other Dicrocceliidee in the dis-
tribution of the yolk-glands and in the shape of the pharynx.
Another important feature is the distance separating the ovary
from the shell-gland complex. From the genus Dicroceliwm it is
further distinguished by the position of the testes and the ovary
and by the extent of the uterus. With Platynosomwm it is more
closely allied, yet the differences between it and this genus are
greater than those separating Dicroceliwm from Platynosomum or
Kurytrema. It is rather curious that this new species does not
show any particularly close relationship to “ Dicrocelinum” infidum
de Faria from the snake, Hwnectes marina. The latter is closely
allied to the avian genus Platynosomum and should be included
in it, unless de Faria’s doubtful observation in regard to the
excretory vesicle proves to be correct.
SryPHLODORA NAJH, sp.n. (Text-fig. 122, A.)
Four somewhat macerated specimens of this species were found
in the ureters of the Cobra. The species is a typical member of
the genus Styphlodora and presents a very great resemblance to
S. serrata Looss and to S. horrida Leidy. The features separating
it from these two species are so slight that I have some hesitation
in regarding it as a distinct species. They are, however, quite as
distinctive as those separating the above two species from each
other. The difficulty is rather increased by the fact that the
present specimens, although mature, are possibly not fully grown.
The length is 2°0-2°4 inm., the greatest breadth -42—55 mm.,
which occurs a little behind the ventral sucker. The breadth of
the whole postacetabular region is fairly uniform, and there is
only a very slight attenuation in the neck. There isa considerable
amount of dorso-ventral flattening. Im each of the specimens
cuticular spines were entirely absent, but it is practically certain
that they have fallen off, and it would be unreasonable to suppose
that this isan unarmed form. On that account I have had spines
depicted in the drawing.
The oral sucker is subterminal and has a diameter of *22--25 mm.
It is rounded and rather shallow. ‘The ventral sucker is slightly
transverse and measures *24x°25 mm. It is only very little
larger than the ora: sucker, and it is situated at a distance of
-67—84 mm. from the anterior end, 7. e. about one-third of the
body-length. There is a distinct prepharynx followed by a large
pharynx measuring about "13 x-14 mm. The esophagus is about
the same length, and the bifurcation takes place midway between
the suckers. The intestinal diverticula are fairly straight and of
considerable width. They are longer than in the other species of
Styphlodora, reaching to within 18-29 mm. of the posterior end.
They are very slightly unequal in length.
The main excretory vesicle was entirely invisible, but it was
apparent that it gave off numerous lateral branches, which,
anastomosing freely, gave the body a honeycomb-like appearance.
The testes lie obliquely behind one another, the left being in
eeu
TWO NEW TREMATODES. 855
front. They are separated by the uterus, which passes between
them, but does not overlap them to any great extent. Their
outline is irregular, but they appear to be roughly triangular or
trilobate. The anterior testis lies almost exactly midway between
the two ends of the body, but its position in relation to the ovary
varies somewhat, and it may be slightly nearer than is shown in
the figure. The posterior testis is about -27 mm. behind the
anterior. They touch the intestinal diverticula or overlap them
to a very small extent. Their dimensions are, on an average,
-21x-17 mm. and *22x'19 mm. Thecirrus-pouch is of moderate
length and uniform width, measuring 31 x-11 mm. It extends
to about the posterior border of the ventral sucker, and contains
a convoluted vesicula, a short pars prostatica, and a fairly long
ductus ejaculatorius. In each of the specimens the cirrus was
exserted and was longer than the pouch itself. The genital
aperture is situated in the middle line, almost immediately in
front of the ventral sucker,
The small round ovary lies just behind the ventral sucker, a
little to the right side, and measures "13 mm, in diameter,
Immediately behind it lies a somewhat smaller receptaculum
seminis. ‘he yolk-glands lie on each side at the level of the
ovary. They are, for the most part, external to the intestinal
diverticula, but they also overlap them dorsally. They consist on
each side of about a dozen fairly large follicles, which extend from
the posterior border of the ventral sucker to the anterior border
of the left testis. The transverse yolk-ducts cross the posterior
border of the ovary.
The uterus is poorly developed. It passes back between the
testes to near the posterior end of the body and returns along
much the same path, terminating ina short vagina. It is only
slightly convoluted and contains a comparatively small number
of eggs. It is confined within the space bounded by the intestinal
diverticula, and it does not form any convolutions behind the ends
of the intestine, as is the case in the other species of Styphlodora.
The ova are rather elongated, oval, possessing a large operculum
and, in a few cases, a small knob at the anopereular pole. They
measure *038—"048 mm. x ‘019-024 mm., the average size being
043 x :021 mm.
The features which appear to distinguish this form as a definite
species are the length of the intestinal diverticula and the
restricted extent of the uterus. It is not impossible that both
these features may be less marked in a fully-grown specimen,
In addition the yolk-glands are slightly less extensive than they
are in the other species of the genus. From S. serrata it is
further distinguished by the relatively larger size of the suckers,
Both S. condita and S. horrida also possess relatively smaller
suckers, and in these species the distance between the suckers is
considerably less. The only other species of Styphlodora, namely
S. similis Sonsino and S. bascaniensis Goldberger, present marked
features of difference from the present species.
DT*
856 DR. WILLIAM NICOLL ON
REFERENCES.
1. Ds Faria, Gomez. 1910.—Contribution towards the Classifi-
eation of Brazilian Entozoa. IJ. Dicrocelium infidum,
n. sp., Parasite of the Gall-bladder of Hunectes marina L.
Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, i1. (1) pp. 22-28, pl. 2.
2. De Farta, Gomnz. 1911.—Beitriige zur Systematik der bra-
zilianischen Helminthen. IV. Styphlodora condita, n. sp.
Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, ii. (1) pp. 40-45, pl. 1.
3. Gonppercer, J. 1911—A New ‘Trematode (Styphlodora
bascaniensis) with a blind Laurer’s Canal. Proc. U.S. Nat.
Mus. xl, pp. 233-239.
4. Leipy, J. 1850.—Descriptions of Two Species of Distoma, with
the partial History of one of them. Journ. Acad. Nat. Sc.
Philadelphia, ser. 2, vol. i. pp, 301-310, pl. 43.
5. Looss, A. 1899.—Weitere Beitrige zur Kenntniss der
Trematoden-Fauna Aegyptens. Zoolog. Jahrbiicher, Abt. f.
Syst, xii. pp. 707-708, pl. 26, fig. 28.
6. Opuner, T. 1910.—Nordostafrikanische Trematoden. Results
Swedish Zool. Exped. to Egypt and White Nile, 1901, p. 53,
note 2, fig, v.
5]. Statistical Note on the Worm Parasites collected from
the Animals dying in the Zoological Gardens, from
December 1910 till April 1912. By Wriu1am Nicont,
M.A., D.Se., M.D., F.Z.S., Lister Institute of Preventive
Medicine, London.
[ Received May 30, 1912: Read June 4, 1912, |
INDEX.
Page
Ethology: Animals dying in the Zoological
Society’s Gardens, numbers infected with
[OAV GHOUAOAS cooconses noes ssecsodeessbeonacunndenns eld
Geographical Zoology : Importance of ascertaining
distribution of parasitic worms .................. 857
At the scientific meeting of the Society held on May 21st last,
{ referred to the exeellent work which is being done by the
Prosectorial department in acquiring information concerning the
parasites which infect the animals living in the Gardens. This
is particularly noteworthy in regard to the worm parasites, about
which many valuable facts have been obtained, Following my
remarks at the meeting, Dr. Beddard suggested that I might be
able to supply some general information regarding the animals
which had been sent to me for examination, and acting on this
suggestion I venture to offer the following communication.
The scheme, which owes its initiation to the Secretary of the
LL OO tint
WORM PARASITES. 857
Society, was put into action in November 1910, and the practical
working has been evolved as follows : A general examination of the
viscera of all the animals killed or dying in the Gardens is made
by the Pathologist, after which certain selected examples are
forwarded to me for further examination. The desirability of this
latter procedure is shown by the fact that a very large proportion of
Entozoa are too small to be detected in the course of an ordinary
routine examination; and although the detection of such forms
does not involve any very special skill, yet it is a tedious process
and one which necessitates some experience. In justification of
this extra trouble it may be remarked that the comparatively
few animals which have been submitted to this additional
examination have yielded almost as large a number of parasitic
worms as all the other animals put together. This fact, I
venture to believe, is a plea for a still more extended and
exhaustive system of examination, dealing with all the animals
which die in the Gardens. This, naturally, would involve some.
additional expenditure, which the Society is probably not at
present in a position to incur, but it would certainly yield a very
rich return.
In addition to supplying information with regard to the
diseases and habits of the animals living in the Gardens, as was
the original intention of the scheme, it also provides oppor-
tunities of studying the parasitic fauna of the various countries
from which the animals come. This is a very important con-
sideration, for it is an unfortunate fact that in most of the large
faunistic expeditions which have hitherto been undertaken
practically no attempt has been made to deal with the internal
parasites. As important exceptions to this may be mentioned
the German Expedition to Spitzbergen in 1898, and the Swedish
Expedition to Egypt and the White Nile in 1901. By both of
these expeditions a large number of parasitic forms has been
collected, and the results have been published in a series of very
valuable monographs. Dr. Leiper has, at these meetings, on
more than one occasion called attention to this regrettable
neglect of the parasitic fauna, and has urged on collectors the
great service they would render by making even a cursory
attempt to collect parasitic worms.
During the past seventeen months a total of 198 animals have
been submitted to me for examination, the great majority of
which have been birds and reptiles. Of these, 87 were found to
be infected with worm parasites of one kind or another, 7.e.,
about 44 per cent. In most cases the infection was single, only
one species of parasite occurring ; but in an Indian Cobra as many
as six different species were found. As is generally the case,
Nematode infections were much more numerous than any others,
there being 60 cases. Trematodes were found in 28 cases, and
Cestodes in 15. The Trematodes belong to about 20 distinct:
species, a large proportion of which are new, and several of
which are new generic types,
858 ON WORM PARASITES.
From the reports of Dr. Beddard and Dr. Leiper I gather that
during the same period 41 additional cases of infection with tape-
worms, and 53 of infection with Nematodes have been observed.
To these must be added a very considerable number of infections
with larval Filariz observed by Mr. Plimmer. These figures,
excluding the larval Filarie, give a total of about 180, of which
the infection with Trematodes, Cestodes, and Nematodes is
respectively 28, 56, and 113. This appears to show that
Trematode parasites are much rarer than other forms, but that
is certainly not the case. It must be remembered that only a
comparatively small number of the animals passing through the
Prosectorium were adequately searched for Trematodes. The
extent to which Trematodes and the smaller intestinal Nematodes
escape notice except when thoroughly searched for may be
gathered from the following table.
Trematodes. Cestodes. Nematodes.
Total number of cases of infection 28 56 is
Number of cases found only on
further examination ............ 20 15 60
Rercenta ce mean earn 5 eee err 71 26 53
It may be added that the bulk of the Cestoda which were
not noted on first examination were small immature forms or
fragments of no value. It may therefore be safely affirmed that
only a negligible fraction of the mature tapeworms actually
escape detection in the Prosectorium. The matter, however, is
different with Trematodes ; and in view of the fact that only about
one-tenth of the total number of animals dying in the Gardens
have been submitted to a thorough examination, it must appear
that the number of Trematodes actually occurring is considerably
greater. Even allowing that they only occur in 5 per cent. of
cases, Which is taking an extremely low estimate, we ought to
have had instead of 28 records a total of well over 100. In the
same way the number of small intestinal Nematodes ought to
be much increased.
These remarks, however, are not intended as a criticism of the
efforts of the prosectorial staff. Parasitic worms are, after all,
only a very small part of the work of this department of the
Society, and as I have mentioned in the beginning of this com-
munication, considerable praise is due for the results actually
obtained. My chief intention is to show that parasitic worms
are undoubtedly an important concern and that their importance
justifies the attention which is being paid to them. Their claim
to notice had until recently been somewhat neglected by the
Society, and it seems necessary that someone should offer a plea
for their vindication. ‘There can be no doubt that the attention
which the Society, thanks to the efforts of Dr. Chalmers Mitchell,
is devoting to these forms will do much to benefit Zoology as a
whole.
ON NEW FOSSIL REPTILES. 859
On some new Fossil Reptiles from the Permian and
Triassic Beds of South Africa. By R. Broom, D.Sc.,
C.M.Z.8.
[Received May 13, 1912 : Read June 4, 1912. |
(Plates XC.—XCIIL.*)
INDEX.
Systematic : Page
Taurops macrodon, gen. et sp. n. ...............2..... 859
Galeops whaitsi, gen. et sp. n. ch R860,
Scymnognathus whaitsi, gen. ah SD Te aseeccararogona OIL
AMlurosaurus striatidens, sp. nM. ..............002...-.. 863
Pristerognathus platyrhinus, sp. n................06608. 863
Alopecorhinus parvidens, gen. et sp. n. ............... 864
Ictidognathus hemburyi, sp. n. ........................ 865
Endothiodon whaitsi, sp. N. .......2..0..e20ee seen. 866
E. platyceps, sp. n.. F Sees ca eae SOT
Prodicynodon enn ETS, | SPaeMlerec een ease eae OO
Dicynodon to include Oudenodon ..................:.. 868
Pristerodon to include Opisthoctenodon............... 868
Dicynodon laticeps, Sp. 0.............cceeeeereeeeeeeeeeees 868
1D), JOSIMIAXGOOS, El We, sonccoenoovmpedeodecnsudeopennondenbeoe (tos)
D. lutriceps, sp. n. Auchan seein leiiusisisdeaas cones OO.
Emydops minor, gen. wa Salley wesenecediste sce slemeaenian ef SUEL
Ictidopsis elegans, gen. et Sp. 1. ......:e:eeeeeeceeeeeeee 872
Nythosaurus browni, sp. n. He Been ccrimcl ae She
Endothiodon subdivided : see » Addanduna Peet MOTO
Emydochampsa, gen. 0..............:cseseceseeeereereeeess 875
The following series of new reptiles forms an important addition
to our knowledge of the Karroo faunas. The majority have
been found by the Rev. J. H. Whaits, of Beaufort West. Of
the others one was found by Mr. Alfred Brown, of Aliwal North,
one by Mr. H. J. Hembury, and a few by myself.
Suborder DINOCEPHALITIA.
TAUROPS MACRODON, gen. et sp.n. (PI. XC. fig. 1.)
The snout of this large Dinocephalian was obtained at Bos-
manshoek at the foot of the Komsberg. Though so little has
been obtained we have enough to give the distinguishing characters
of this new type. In size it almost equals Zapinocephalus
atherstonei, but the snout though narrower is considerably deeper,
and it differs in the great degree of development of the teeth,
especially of the incisors. Where the snout is broken across,
about the transverse plane of the back of the anterior nares, the
width is 190 mm. and the height about 100 mm. ‘The anterior
nares are unusually small and situated about 90 mm. from the front
of the snout. The distance between the two nostrils is about
45 mm. The condition of the bone renders it almost impossible
to make out the sutures, the only one that is distinct being that
between the two premaxillaries.
* For explanation of the Plates see p. 875.
860 DR. R. BROOM ON
The teeth are for the most part badly preserved, but as they
are broken off at different levels and as a large number of
replacing teeth are present, the structure can be made out without
much difticulty. There are 14 teeth preserved, of which the
first five are large and long. From the 6th backwards the teeth
steadily decrease in size and the crowns become quite short.
Possibly there are two or three teeth lost behind the 14th, but
it seems improbable that there are many. The anterior teeth
are of the usual Dinocephalian type. They are, except where the
root is being absorbed by a replacing tooth, of great length, the
whole root and crown being about 90 mm. The anterior cusp is
long and narrow, and on section is semicircular. At its base it
measures about 9 mm. across and gradually narrows towards the
point. None of the anterior upper teeth shows the whole anterior
cusp, but it probably measures about 20 mm. in length if not
more. The posterior basal cusp is about 15 mm. in width and
has a slightly concave surface. The posterior teeth have short
cusps. The 12th tooth has a crown only 12 mm. in height.
The teeth in the lower jaw are apparently closely similar in
type to those in the upper. Most of the functional teeth are
badly weathered away, but the weathering shows that at the base
of each is a well-developed replacing tooth similar in type to the
functional one. It seems probable that the long anterior cusps
of the front teeth interdigitated and that the evinding took place
by the meeting of broad posterior cusps. The edges ‘of the long
anterior cusps “would thus form an admirable cutting apparatus,
and the internal cusps would take the part of molars. In the
Dinocephalians almost the whole dental apparatus is placed in the
front of the snout, and the absence of grinding molars such as aré
seen in pe contemporaneous or slightly earlier American herbi-
vores, é6.g. Diadectes, is explained by the crushing or grinding
function Taine been taken up by the peculiarly specialiséd
incisors.
Suborder DROMASAURIA.
GALEoPS WiAirst, gen. et sp.n. (PI. XCI. fig. 6.)
This new génus is founded on the antetior half of the skeleton
of a Dromasaurian. The skull is Grushed but fairly well preserved,
arid the shoulder- -girdle and front limb are in good condition,
while remains of about 18 vertebre are seen. Wintor tunately the
matrix is very hard and little can be done in the way of develop=
ment. The specimen was found by Mr. Whaits on the farm
La-de-da, about 20 milés to the west of Beaufort West, and
probably belongs to the upper part of the Pareiasaurus- Zone.
The skull is in many respects very remarkable. The orbit is
exceedingly large and the temporal fossa deep and very narrow,
and the squamosal has a long descending process which brings
the quadrate below the back of the orbit. The face is very short,
and there appear to be no teeth in either upper or lower jaw.
The bones of the skull are not in good condition for showing
i \ 5
a)
4
o
‘
'
4
Ws :
e j ‘ gg nts
ey }
f % PAO
val t . i 1 ,
“i - yay { ?, -
R.Br oom del,
SHOMU) Mle Vee UG AUN) IONS) Sil,
PZ.) Woe e Gr,
Huth, Lith? Londen.
let eis 1S),
+
}
Min
aN
fey Aare Kenya) JONL Heal.
A
fe}
ire}
a
[o}
fe
a
i
|
|
jai
0
ba
S|
=
:
=
Oo
v1
O
fx
E
q
q
H
»
O
0
R.Broom del,
ip 4ssiuelua tele soni,
Huth, Lith London
BR.Broom del.
SOUTH AFRICAN FOSSIL REPTILES.
vere nike
¥ sie
AS Stee ein
R.Broom del, Huth, Lith? London.
SO) UUs hy MERU CUANIN[ lO) Si Sie. RUSE IMME eS)
NEW FOSSIL REPTILES. 861
sutures. The snout is missing in front of the nostril, but from
the shape of the lower jaw its length can be fairly well assumed.
The nostril is large and the distance between it and the orbit very
short. It is probable that the septomaxillary meets the lachrymal.
The suborbital and postorbital arches are slender. The frontal
and parietal regions are both fairly wide and there is a large oval
parietal foramen. The squamosal is somewhat like that of the
Dinocephalia, but is slender and the descending process very long.
There appears to be a distinct quadrato-jugal. The palate, so far
as preserved, agrees with that of the Therocephalia. There is a
pair of long slender prevomers, and the palatines and back of the
pterygoids are not unlike those of Seylacosaurus, but whether in
other respects the palate is Therocephalian or Dinocephalian the
evidence does not show. Certainly the palate is not the least
like that of the Anomodont. The lower jaw is short and tooth-
less. It agrees fairly closely with that of the Anomodont, but
there is a rudimentary coronoid process.
The shoulder-girdie has a large distinct precoracoid and coracoid
loosely articulated to each other. The scapula is somewhat like
that of the Dinocephalia and also a little like that of the Thero-
cephalian Jctidosuchus, but unlike that of the Anomodont. The
limb bones are long and slender.
Galeops is an entirely new type of Dromasaurian and represents
a new family, the Galeopide, characterised by the absence of
teeth and the presence of a small coronoid process. The other
family, which may be called the Galechiride, includes Galechirus
and Galepus, both with teeth and without a coronoid process.
Suborder THEROGCEPHALTIA.
ScYMNOGNATHUS WHAITSI, gen. et sp.n. (Pl. XC. figs. 4, 5.)
This interesting type was found by Mr. Whaits near Beaufort
West. Within quite a small area remains of four or five
animals were obtained. Unfortunately, most of the bones are
extremely weathered, and so infiltrated with lime as to be
practically limestone nodules so hard that any development is
almost impossible. Two skulls are sufticiently well preserved to
show the general characters of the genus, though it is impossible
to be sure of most of the sutures.
The new type is a very near ally of Gorgonops torvus Owen,
and it is only after considerable deliberation that I have decided
to place it in a new genus. With perfect certainty it can be
placed in the Family Gorgonopide. When Owen first described
Gorgonops in 1876 he unfortunately came to the conclusion that
the temporal fossa was roofed over as in Labyrinthodonts or
Pareiasaurus, and this mistake was also made by Lydekker in
1890, and by Seeley in 1895. On examining the type and, at
that time, only known specimen when in London three years ago,
I discovered that the temporal fossa is not roofed over, though
the parietal region is broad, and noted the observation in a paper
862 DR. R. BROOM ON
published in 1910*. Within the last few months Mr. Whaits
has fortunately discovered a good skull of Gorgonops which shows
that it has quite a large temporal opening, very similar to that
in the present genus.
In general appearance Scymmognathus differs from the more
typical Therocephalians mainly in having the intertemporal region
about as wide as the interorbital. The snout is long, the orbits
small, the temporal region fairly wide, and the squamosals more
powerfully developed than in most Therocephalians.
The total length of the skull is, in the type, 305 mm. In a
second but much crushed specimen the length is probably about
325 mm. From the front of the snout to the front of the orbit
the measurement in the type is 165 mm., and the length of the
orbit about 40mm. The interorbital width in the type is 70mm. :
in another very imperfect specimen it measures 78 mm., and ina
third about 76 mm. The narrowest part of the parietal region
measures in one of the larger specimens 78 mm.
The parietal foramen is situated well back and is 6 mm. in
diameter.
Though the limits of many of the bones cannot clearly be made
out, much of the cranial structure can be seen. The bones of the
snout seem to agree with those of the better known Thero-
cephalians, though the septomaxillary is relatively larger. The
jugal is unusually well developed and the postorbital is very large.
The postfrontal also seems to be much larger than in any other
type hitherto examined. The squamosal is more massive than in
most Therocephalians, and the quadrate is relatively small and
largely hidden by the squamosal. The occipital condyle is single.
The lower jaw is fairly similar to that previously described
and figured in Lycosuchus and Aloposaurus. The front of the
dentary is very deep and has a well-marked mental process.
Posteriorly the dentary has a short coronoid process and for a
considerable distance lies above the angular. The surangular is
much smaller than in other known Therocephalans.
There are five upper incisors, one large canine and three or four
molars. The incisors are long pointed teeth, oval in section, and
apparently without serrations. The space occupied by the five
incisors in three specimens 1s 37 mm., 39 mm., and 40mm. ‘The
space between the last incisor and the canine in four specimens is
18 mm., 22mm., 25mm.,and 26mm. The length of the canine
in seven specimens is 16 mm., 18 mm., 20 mm., 20 mm., 20 mm.,
20mm.,and 21mm. Behind the canine is a diastema varying from
7 mm. to 16 mm., followed by either three or four molars. The
number of molars apparently depends on age. When three molars
are present the distance occupied by them is 20 or 21 mm.: when
four are present they occupy 25 mm. to 29 mm.
1 3 or 4
3 or 4
The dental formula is, i. il
42 ¢
* “ Observations on some specimens of South African Fossil Reptiles preserved in
the British Museum.” ‘I'r. Roy. Soc. 8. Afr. vol. 1. pt. 1, 1910, p. 20.
NEW FOSSIL REPTILES. 863
Scymnognathus may prove to be related to Seymnosaurus.
The dental formule are practically the same in the two genera,
but Scymnosaurus seems to be a higher type of Therocephalian,
and the shape of the snout and lower jaw differs sufficiently
markedly to justify one in keeping the genera distinct.
ANLUROSAURUS STRIATIDENS, sp. n. (Pl. XCI. fig. 7.)
The imperfect snout which forms the type of this new species
was discovered by me at Kuilspoort, near Beaufort West, at a
horizon which is probably 500 feet above the town.
It is a smaller species than @. felinus, and in addition differs
from this and the other known species in the relatively small size
of the teeth, in the feeble development of the serrations, and in the
incisors and canine having feeble vertical ridges on the enamel.
So far as preserved there is a pretty close agreement in the
structure of the bones of the snout with those of previously
described species. The septomaxillary is larger than usual. The
mandible has a broad angular chin.
The incisors are small, rounded, pointed teeth, placed so near
each other as to be almost touching. Those whose crowns are
preserved (3rd, 4th, 5th) have the enamel folded into about half
a dozen vertical corrugations. ‘The 5th tooth has fine serrations
on its posterior edge. The space occupied by the five incisors is
16mm. The diastema between the 5th incisor and the canine is
7 mm.
The canine is long and slender. The base measures antero-
posteriorly 7 mm. and the height of the crown as preserved is
14 mm. It originally probably measured about 20 mm. The
molars are small with only faint indications of posterior serrations.
Two are well preserved and there are remains of the other two.
Probably 5 is the complete number, which would make the dental
formula agree with the other species of #lurosaurus. The four
preserved molars measure 10 mm., and the front one is only 9mm.
behind the canine.
PRISTEROGNATHUS PLATYRHINUS, sp.n. (Pl. XCI. fig. 8.)
The specimen which I take as the type of this new species is an
imperfect snout found by Mr. Whaits at Grootfontein, about 12
miles to the west of Beaufort West, and probably from the upper
part of the Pareiasawrus-Zone. The specimen consists of the
front half of the skull. It is broken into three pieces and the
upper nasal region is missing. The matrix is extremely hard and
ditticult to clear off, but most of the characters can be satisfactorily
made out.
In the large majority of Therocephalians the snout is deeper
than broad. In this specimen the snout is broad and flat, and the
lower jaw comparatively straight and with very little of the usual
upeurving in the canine and incisor region. The widest part of
the snout is immediately above the canine, where it measures
55 mm., and on the same plane the height of the snout is 40 mm.
864 DR. R. BROOM ON
There is very little crushing. Nearer the front of the nose the
height is only about 25 mm. and the width 45 mm. The
maxillary bone is rather deeply pitted. The palate is broad
and flat behind and in front slopes upwards to the opening of the
internal nares. The prevomers are narrow slender bones which
in section are seen to have thin vertical plates. The palatines
are apparently as in Scylacosaurus, but appear to approach each
other more closely in the middle line. The pterygoids have each
a very thin vertical plate which is closely placed against its
neighbour.
There are apparently 6 incisors, though only evidence of the
last five are preserved. The anterior ones are fairly round on
section, but the last three are more flattened and havea posterior
edge which is not improbably serrated. The teeth decrease in
size as we pass backwards, the 6th being only about half the size
of the 4th. The last four teeth occupy a space of 20°5 mm. and
the whole six probably 30 mm. ‘The diastema between the 6th
incisor and the canine is 9 mm. Thecanine at its base measures
10 mm. by 7mm. Behind the canine is a diastema of 7 mm.
followed by 8 pointed molars. Each of the anterior molars has
an antero-posterior diameter of nearly 3 mm., and the whole series
occupies a space of 29 mm.
The dentition of the lower jaw is mainly concealed in front.
Probably there are 3 incisors and 1 canine. The molars are well
shown on the right side and are 8 in number, and occupy a space
of 32mm. There is no evidence of any serrations, and were they
present the specimen would be cupecred to show some of them.
Stoo! ne:
There is some doubt whether this specimen belongs to the same
genus as Pristerognathus polyodon Seeley. The type is only the
front of a snout, and the number of molars is unknown, and only
a figure of the underside is given by Seeley. However, the two
specimens are probably from near the same horizon, and the
arrangement of the teeth, so far as known, is sufficiently close to
render it advisable to place this new species provisionally in
Seeley’s genus Pristerognathus.
The dental formula is probably i.
ALOPECORHINUS PARVIDENS, gen. et sp.n. (PI. XCI. fig. 9.)
This new genus is founded on an imperfect snout ee, by
Mr. Whaits at Beaufort West. It consists of the greater part of
the left maxillary and dentary and much of the right maxillary
and dentary.
It resembles Pristerognathus platyrhinus in the broad short
nose and: approximates in dental formula, but differs in having
a much more slender jaw and in the relatively smaller size of the
teeth, especially the molars, and in having a much shorter
precanine portion of the snout.
The anterior upper incisors are lost but there is evidence of the
last three. The whole series probably measured 19 mm, The
NEW FOSSIL REPTILES. 865
diastema between the last incisor and the canine is only 2 mm.
The canine measures at its base 6 mm. by 5mm. The molars
are at least 7 in number, and are small, pointed but apparently
unserrated teeth. The seven occupy 17°5 mm. Between the
canine and the first preserved molar is a diastema of 9 mm.
The lower incisors are preserved in section and are 4 in number,
the 4th being inside the line of the others. The canine is far
forward and small and rounded, the section measuring 3°5 mm.
in diameter.
The dental formula is probably i. _ é. 7 ann eS
P
IcTIDOGNATHUS HEMBURYI, sp. n. (PI, XCI. figs. 10, 11.)
This new species is founded on four imperfect snouts found by
Mr. H. J. Hembury at Beaufort West. There are minor
differences between the snouts probably due to crushing, to age,
and possibly to sex, but I believe they all belong to one species.
To avoid any possibility of confusion I shall take the skull
(fig. 10) as the type. It is the best preserved specimen but does
not show the molars satisfactorily.
As in Alopecorhinus the snout is broader than deep. This
is probably also the case in /ctidognathus parvidens, but the only
known specimen of this species is considerably crushed. From
the front of the snout to the front of the orbit the measurement
is 42 mm. ‘The antero-posterior diameter of the orbit is 18 mm.
The interorbital region is 19 mm. across. The measurement
across the snout at the canine region is about 27 mm.
The premaxillary is a very small bone forming the anterior and
lower margins of the nostril, It carries six small pointed, rounded,
smooth incisors. I fail to detect serrations on any of them. The
six incisors occupy a space of 10 mm.
The septomaxillary is unusually large and forms as large a part
of the facial surfaces as does the premaxillary. Thereis the same
foramen between it and the maxillary seen in typical Thero-
cephalians, but it is relatively smaller than in other forms.
The nasal bone is well developed and is interesting from the
fact that it is only very little broader behind than in front.
The maxillary is typically developed. As in so many Thero-
cephalians, the centre part of the bone is markedly pitted as if for
the accommodation of glands or sense organs. In the same region
there are numerous foramina passing into the bone, and some of
these foramina lead back into a canal in the bone. As there is
no large foramen in the maxillary bone which might be regarded
as the foramen for the maxillary branch of the Vth nerve, I
think it probable that this nerve subdivides in the maxillary
bone and comes to the surface by a number of small foramina,
and that the pits were for sense organs which were supplied by
this nerve. The tactile vibrisse of mammals, or the remarkable
sense organs of the beak of Ornithorhynchus may be the modified
homolognes of these supposed ancestral organs.
866 DR. R. BROOM ON
There are two canines—a very small anterior and a fairly large
long slender posterior one. The small canine has a diameter of
‘5 mm.: the large canine measures 3°5 mm. by 4mm. The two
are a little more than 2 mm. apart. The exact number of
molars is a little doubtful but appears to be 8, and they oceupy
16 mm. in one of the specimens. The molars appear to be
all short, smooth, pointed teeth without serrations.
Tn the lower jaw there are four incisors, a large canine, and eight
eo In
Ictidognathus parvidens there are certainly nine upper molars and
possibly ten, but as this species is certainly allied to J. parvidens
it seems better to keep both in the same genus.
- 6 2
molars. The dental formula would thus be 1. yy @ 7? M-
Suborder ANOMODONTIA.
* ENDOTHIODON WHAITSI, sp.n. (Pl. XCIII. fig. 18.)
This new species is only known by the skull, a few vertebre
and ribs, and a couple of limb-bones. Fortunately the skull is in
beautiful condition. The specimen was discovered by the Rev. J.
H. Whaits at Beaufort West. It isa near ally to HYndothiodon
uniseries Owen, and has the molars in a single row, but it
differs from EH. uniseries in a considerable number of points
besides in being nearly twice as large. In Hndothiodon uniseries
the greatest length of the skull is 360 mm.: in Hndothiodon
whaitsi the skull measures in length 570mm. With the ex-
ception of Oudenodon magnus it is the largest known Anomodont.
As I hope shortly to publish a full account of the genus Endo-
thiodon, 1 shall here merely give a preliminary description of this
interesting species.
The skull is narrow and deep. The greatest width across the
squamosals is probably about 360 mm., while the interorbital
region is only 140 mm. and the greatest width of the palate
150mm. There is a slight degree of crushing, but not such as to
make these measurements far wrong. ‘The notch in the pre-
maxilla for the point of the lower jaw is very deep and narrow.
The nostrils are large, measuring 65 mm. by 45mm. The nasals
do not overhang them as in #, wniseries, the whole width of the
nasals being only 85 mm. The orbit is situated 180 mm. behind
the front of the snout and measures from 60 to 65 mm. in
diameter.
The parietal crest forms a huge arch over the top of the head
about 300 mm. in length. Itis very narrow for its depth, and
is mainly formed by the postorbitals and the squamosals, the
parietals being relatively small. Near the union of the anterior
and middle third the two postorbitals are pushed apart by an
enormous development of the preparietal. This forms a pro-
minent boss 90 mm. in length and 50 mm. in width, and rising
20 mm. above the edge of the postorbitals. In itis situated the
* See also Addendum, p. 876.
NEW FOSSIL REPTILES. 867
parietal foramen, which is only about 10 mm. in diameter. This
is the more remarkable in that in Z. wniseries the foramen
measures nearly 20 mm. in diameter.
The zygomatic arch is very massive. The malar process of the
jugal is less marked than in the smaller species. The squamosal
extends forwards to below the postorbital arch. Anteriorly the
zygomatic arch measures 65 mm. in depth and posteriorly
80 mm.
The lower jaw is very powerful and measures 400 mm. in
greatest length.
* ENDOTHIODON PLATYCEPS, sp.n. (PI. XCIIT. fig. 19.)
This new species was also discovered by Mr. Whaits, near
Beaufort West. It is founded on a fairly complete but slightly
crushed and probably barely mature skull. The lower jaw is
complete, and the only important part missing from the skull is
the whole of the nasal region and the anterior part of the
frontal.
The greatest length of the skull is 275 mm., and the greatest
width about 215 mm.
The frontal region is flat, and the parietal crest instead of
vising up from this is continued straight back. There does not
appear to be a distinct postfrontal bone. The preparietal is large
and passes forwards for 35 mm. in front of the pineal foramen.
The foramen is 14 mm. wide and 8 mm. in antero-posterior
diameter. Behind it is a large boss formed by the preparietal.
There is nothing particularly noteworthy about the squamosals,
jugals, or occiput.
The dentition is better seen in the lower than in the upper
jaw. It is made up of aseries of 7 teeth in a fairly regular row.
Behind this the same row has 9 more teeth, but median to these
there appear others, so that the front half of the dentition is an
irregular single row, the back half an irregular double row.
Parts of the crowns of two teeth are preserved and there appear
to be no serrations on them. If this prove to be the case, this
species will require to be placed in a new genus, as /ndothiodon
bathystoma has the teeth markedly serrated in front and behind.
The lower jaw is pointed in front, but at the lower part of the
symphysis it is very broad. The back part of the dentary is
unusually slender. Hndothiodon platyceps difters from H. wniseries
and #. whaitsi in the double row of teeth behind and also in the
flat broad head; while from #. bathystoma it differs even more
markedly. The teeth are smaller than in the other species.
PRODICYNODON BEAUFORTENSIS, sp.n. (Pl. XCIII. fig. 21.)
This small species is founded on an imperfect skull obtained by
me at Kuilspoort at about the same horizon at which T'aognathus
megalodon was found. The specimen consists of the crushed ant-
orbital portion of a small skull with the front two-thirds of the
* See also Addendum, p. 875.
868 DR. R. BROOM ON ,
lower jaw in position. At first sight the skull might readily be
taken for that of a small Oudenodon, but there are two marked
differences. There are a number of small maxillary teeth, and
the lower jaw ends in front in a pointed beak which fits into a
deep depression in the premaxillary exactly as in Hndothiodon.
There is no tusk.
The nostril is 8 mm, in length by 7 mm. in depth. The
orbit is 12 mm. behind the nostril. The inter-orbital width is
probably 14 mm. Close to the outer edge of the maxillary bone
are at least two small smooth pointed molars, and other molars
are arranged in a row further in.
The lower jaw is almost typically Endothiodont,
The only form nearly related to the present one is that de-
scribed by me eight years ago as Prodicynodon pearstonensis. The
two agree in the arrangement and structure of the molars, but
differ markedly in the proportions of the head. P. pearstonensis
has a much broader snout and an enormous premaxillary. It
also has the orbit much further back. As neither type is in
good condition it 1s impossible to affirm with certainty that the
two species belong to the same genus, but at present it will be
eonvenient to keep them together.
When Prodicynodon was first described, and until recently, the
presence or absence of a tusk was believed to be a generic dis-
tinction. Dicynadon and Oudenodon were helieved to be distinct
genera, For the last five years the evidence has been steadily
aceumulating in favour of the tusk being merely a sexual character,
and now the evidence seems to be conclusive. Mr. Whaits has
collected a large number of the common little Beaufort West
Endothiodont Dialurodon whaitsi, and tusked and_ tuskless
specimens seem to be about equally common, while there are no
other characters to separate the specimens. Mr, D. M.S. Watson
has succeeded in obtaining two specimens of Oudenedon bolorhinus
recently described by me from Kuilspoort, at the same locality
as afforded the type, but one specimen is tusked and the other
tuskless,
This conelusion will necessitate the giving up of the genera
Oudenodon and Opisthoctenodon and placing the species of these
old genera under Dicynodon and Pristerodon, Fortunately very
little confusion will result,as I have for years assumed the
possibility of the tusk being merely sexual,
DIcYNODON LATICEPS, sp, n. (Pl, XCII. figs, 12, 13.)
This new species of Dicynodon is founded on a beautiful skull
obtained by Mr. J. H. Whaits on the Nieuwveld. With the
exception of the lower jaw being missing and the tips of the
maxillaries with most of the tusks being broken off, the skull may
be regarded as perfect. It belongs to the very unusual broad-
headed variety of which only a few specimensare known. When
viewed from above the resemblance is so close to Dicynodon
tigriceps Owen as to suggest that it might be a young specimen,
NEW FOSSIL REPTILES. 869
but the palatal view shows that the tusk is differently placed and
relatively very much larger.
The greatest length of the skull measured obliquely from the
snout to the back of the squamosal is 270 mm., and the greatest
width across the squamosal is also 270 mm.
The snout is very short and the nostrils completely roofed over
by the projecting nasals. The breadth across the nasals is 83 mm.
The premaxillary is broad and shallow. The maxilla isshort and
also shallow. ‘The tusk is large and situated right beneath the
orbit, and directed downwards. In diameter it measures 25 mm.
by 28 mm. at its base. The frontal region is broad and flat, the
narrowest part between the orbits being 63 mm. If there is a
distinct postfrontal it is very small. The parietal foramen is
large, measuring 15 mm. by 10 mm. The preparietal lies mainly
in front of it. The parietals are unusually large, and the posterior
branch of the postorbitals more slender than in most species.
The postorbital forms the front half of the long slender post-
orbital arch. The squamosal extends forwards below the post-
orbital arch and has a large articulation with the maxilla. The
pterygoids where they meet are broad and, except for the median
ridge, flat. Considering the great width of the skull the quadrates
are not far apart.
The general structure of the skull will be better understood
from the illustrations given.
DicyNopon Psirracops, sp.n. (PI. XCII. fig. 17.)
In working at the troublesome genus Dicynedon we have con-
stantly been in doubt as to whether the small Dicynodon specimens
are distinct species or only younganimals. Frequently they agree
sufficiently in general shape and structure as to suggest the
probability of their being young = specimens of Dicynodon
leoniceps or some other large species. But this is certainly not
always the case. Many specimens of Dicynodon jouberti are
known from the Pareiasawrus horizon and all small, while no
large Dicynodon is known to occur in the same zone. At Beaufort
West a considerable number of specimens of a small Dicynodon
also occurs, but there is no evidence of any large Dicynodon
having lived at the period. The large Anomodonts are the
Endothiodons. There is thus satisfactory evidence that the
common Dicynodon of the Beaufort West commonage is an adult
animal, and apparently a new species. ‘The best specimens are a
good skull with much of the skeleton and a fairly good skull with
nearly the complete skeleton. I take the latter as the type.
Both specimens were obtained by Mr. J. H. Whaits.
The greatest length of the type skull is 102 mm., and of the
second specimen 112 mm. The width of the type across the
squamosals is about 66 mm. Across the maxilla the maximum
width is 42 mm. The interorbital width is 20 mm., and the
intertemporal 18 mm.
The following are the most noteworthy characteristics of the
Proc. Zoon, Soc.—1912, No. LVIII. 58
870 DR. R. BROOM ON
species. The nasals are so narrow that the nostrils look almost
directly upwards. The upper part of the nasals is thickened,
and the prefrontal region of the orbital margin is also elevated.
The frontal region is broad and flat. The parietal foramen is
situated in an elevated pyeparietal. The postorbitals approach
each other behind the foramen and nearly touch, forming a
parietal ridge. The tusk is small and directed forwards and
downwards. The lower jaw has the front portion unusually
broad and deep. The foramen behind the dentary is very
small.
The whole skeleton from the snout to the end of the tail
probably measures 500 mm.; the humerus measures 50 mm. and
the femur 58 mm.
DICcYNODON LUTRICEPS, sp. n. (PI. XCII. figs. 14-16.)
The type of this new species is an imperfect skull found by me
at Kuilspoort, Beaufort West district. The skull has lost the tip
of the beak, the postorbital and zygomatic arches, and there is
about 20 mm. missing from the postpterygoid and from the
parietal region so that the contact between the occipital and
anterior portions of the skull is lost, but otherwise the skull is
complete.
The most noteworthy characters of the type are the relative
shortness of the beak, the broad concave frontal region, and the
broad flattened intertemporal region, the upper surface of which
is almost entirely formed by the postorbitals. In a maxillary
from the same locality, and believed to be of the same species, the
tusk is feeble and directed downwards and slightly forwards.
The greatest length of the skull from the snout to the back of
the squamosal is about 195 mm., and the greatest width across the
squamosals is 145 mm. From the front of the beak to the orbit
is probably about 48 mm., and the antero-posterior diameter of
the orbit is about 43 mm. The interorbital width is 35 mm., and
the intertemporal region 29 mm.
The type specimen is tuskless. The caniniform process is
directed downwards and forwards and has a marked low outer
ridge which passes upwards towards the jugal arch. Below the
nostril is an anterior ridge parallel to the other and forming a
well-marked valley between the two. The nostril is fairly large
and the nasal is considerably thickened above it, forming an
overhanging supranasal ridge.
The prefrontals are small, but the frontals are well developed.
Posteriorly they enclose between them the small preparietal and
meet the anterior ends of the parietals. The postfrontals are
long and narrow. ‘The preparietal is small and seems to lie
entirely in front of the pineal foramen. The postorbitals are
very large where they overlap the parietals, but the postorbital
arch is unusually feeble.
The parietals are large and powerful, but are almost completely
a
NEW FOSSIL REPTILES. 871
hidden by the postorbitals. There has been a little doubt as to
whether the pair of bones usually supposed (Seeley, Broom, etc.)
to be parietals are really the parietals, or whether the median
bone in which lies the pineal foramen, and usually called the
preparietal (Seeley, Broom) or interparietal (Newton), may perhaps
be the true parietal. This latter view has recently received the
support of Jaekel. The median bone, called for convenience
preparietal, is met with in most Anomodonts. In some (/ndo-
thiodon) it is very large; in others (Cistecephalus) it is quite
absent. The size of the paired bones depends to a considerable
extent on the development of the preparietal. In Cistecephalus
there can hardly be any doubt that the large pair of bones behind
the frontals are the parietals. They have the same relations to
the squamosals, interpavietal, frontals, and postorbitals as the
parietals have in most reptiles, and there can be, I think, no
reasonable doubt but that these bones are homologous with the
parietals of the mammals. When the preparietal appears and
the intertemporal region becomes narrowed the parietals are
much reduced in front, but posteriorly the relations to the
squamosals, interparietal, and postorbitals remain constant. In
Endothiodon the preparietal is so large that the parietal seems to
be completely separated from it by the frontal. In Dicynodon,
as exemplified by this skull, the parietals still meet the frontals.
What the preparietal is, is not clear. It certainly is not the
interparietal. I am inclined to look on it as a neomorph
developed in connection with the pineal eye. There is no trace
ot it known in Dinocephalians, Dromasaurians, Pelycosaurs,
Therocephalians, or Cynodonts, though in some of these the
pineal eye was probably as large as even in Hndothiodon.
There is little of special note in the palate or occiput.
The horizon from which the specimen was obtained is probably
about 300 feet above that of Beaufort West.
EMYDOPS MINOR, gen. et sp.n. (Pl. XCIII. fig. 20.)
When Owen, in 1876, described the specimens of Cistecephalus
in the British Museum, he named one species Wistecephalus
arctatus and referred two specimens to it. The type differs very
considerably from Cistecephalus microrhinus, the type species of
the genus, and Lydekker in his Catalogue places C. arctatus
doubtfully under Cistecephalus. On more than one occasion I
have also expressed the opinion that C. arctatus does not belong
to Cistecephalus.
Recently, I discovered at Kuilspoort a small imperfect skull
which apparently belongs to the same genus as Owen’s C. arctatus,
though a distinct species. Pretty certainly the genus is not
Cistecephalus, and the question arises, is 1t Ouwdenodon, or rather
Dicynodon? The only specimens known are tuskless, and there
are apparently no molar teeth. In the imperfect state of the
specimens it is impossible to clearly differentiate the genus from
do*
872 DR. R. BROOM ON
Dicynodon at present, but there seems little doubt they represent,
if not a distinct genus, at least a subgenus. The more note-
worthy characters are the wide parietal region with large
parietals, slender postorbital arch, and feeble beak.
The length of the skull is probably about 45 mm., and the
ereatest breadth about 30 mm. The orbit measures 12 mm. in
diameter. The intertemporal region is 14 mm. across.
The beak is in very imperfect condition, and little can be made
out with certainty as to its structure. It may be stated with
confidence that 1t was short.
The frontals are large, and form an interorbital region 10 mm.
wide. From near the supraorbital margin to the anterior end of
the parietal there runs backwards and slightly inwards a shallow
groove. ‘There is a moderate sized triangular postfrontal and
a large median preparietal. ‘This latter seems to lie entirely in
front of the pineal foramen. The parietals are large and form
the greater part of the broad intertemporal region. The post-
orbital is long and slender. It forms a feeble postorbital arch
and the inner margin of the temporal fossa. The squamosal is of
the typical Anomodont type. Its zygomatic position extends
forwards to below the orbit. The articular region is badly
preserved.
The lower jaw is very like that of Oudenodon, but the beak
portion is small, and probably little more than the symphyseal
region was covered with horn.
Suborder CYNODONTIA.
IcTIDOPSIS ELEGANS, gen. et sp.n. (Pl. XCIII. fig. 22.)
This new genus and species is founded on a nearly perfect little
skull obtained at Harrismith, Orange River Colony. It is a very
near ally of Vythosaurus larvatus Owen, but is much smaller, and
differs in the number of molars and in other cranial characters.
In general shape the skull agrees fairly well with Vythosaurus.
The orbit is near the middle of the skull and relatively larger than
in the better known genus, while the jugal arch is more slender.
In /ctidopsis the snout is shorter, and the molars are 6 in number
instead of 7.
The greatest length of the skull is probably 63 mm. and the
width is 42 mm. ‘The interorbital width is 12°5 mm.
The premaxillary bone is badly preserved, but it 1s manifest that
there are four mcisors. The first three incisors are moderately
round, but the last is more flattened. There do not appear to
be any posterior serrations.
The maxillary is relatively shorter than in Vythosaurus, and
deeper. Above the canine, and in front of the lachrymal are
little elevations of the bone. On the canine elevated area are
three small foramina and near the root of the 3rd molar two other
en ee
NEW FOSSIL REPTILES. 873
foramina, while two more are near the anterior end of the bone.
As there is no single large supra-maxillary foramen, it is probable
that all these small foramina are for branches of the maxillary
nerve. The canine is long and slender. It is ridged somewhat
after the manner of the canine of the cat. Behind it are 6 molars.
The 1st is small, pointed, and without any cusps. The 2nd, 3rd,
4th, and 5th all closely resemble one another. ‘There is a large
pointed median cusp and a small anterior and posterior cusp.
While essentially similar in type to the molars of NVythosaurus
they differ in that the anterior and posterior cusps are relatively
smaller. The 6th molar is a small tooth, and unfortunately the
crown has been lost from both sides of the skull.
The incisors measure about 6°5 mm. Behind the last incisor
is a diastema of 4mm. The canine measures antero-posteriorly
about 2°5 and its height is 7 mm. Ata distance of 1-5 mm.
behind the canine is the Ist molar, and the whole series of six
occupies the space of 13 mm.
Only a small fragment of the septo-maxillary is preserved, but
it manifestly forms part of the face, and was probably as in
Nythosaurus.
The nasal is moderately wide in front, but narrows on passing
backwards, and then near its middle it becomes about twice as
wide as in front. Round the bone near where it meets the
maxilla is a series of three or four foramina.
The lachrymal forms the front of the orbit and, as in Vytho-
saurus, it is larger than the prefrontal.
As in Vythosaurus and most Cynodonts the prefrontal meets
the postorbital, shutting out the frontal from the orbital margin.
The postorbital forms about half of the postorbital arch and
overlaps a small part of the parietal.
The parietal is large, and there is an obvious pineal foramen.
The squamosal is like that of Wythosaurus, except that in
Ictadopsis there is a much more prominent auditory groove.
The fractured edge of the occipital crest shows the interparietal
distinct from the parietals, and the lateral bone, which I believe
to be the opisthotic, distinct from the parietal, the interparietal,
and from the squamosal.
The occiput and palate have not been cleared.
The dentaries are in position, but the posterior bones of the
jaw have been detached and displaced, probably by insects before
the skull was fossilized.
The type of Jctidopsis elegans was found at Harrismithinassociation
with Zystrosaurus. Unfortunately the geology of Harrismith is
unknown. Some of the first specimens of South-African Dinosaurs
were got there by Mr. J. M. Orpen in 1853, and there can be no
doubt that these are from the Red Beds of the Stormberg Series.
It is not a little startling to find that the same commonage
yields fossils which in Cape Colony belong to a horizon about
3000-4000 feet lower than the Red Beds. Probably the Molteno
874 DR. R. BROOM ON
Beds and the Burghersdorp Beds are greatly thinned out, or
possibly there is an unconformity.
Some years ago I divided the Upper Beaufort, or Triassic Beds,
into three zones: (1) the Lystrosawrus-Zone, (2) the Procolophon-
Zone, and (3) the Cynognathus-Zone. While these zones in the
main hold good, the limits of them are still unknown. In the
extensive Jystroswauruce beds of Colesburg, Middelburg, and
Cradock no Procolophons or Cynodonts are known; but Mr. D.
M. 8S. Watson has recently found Lystrosaurus associated with
Cynodonts to the west of Burghersdorp, and a similar association
we now know occurs at Harrismith. Again, while no Lystro-
saurus or Cynodont remains are certainly known from the
Procolophon beds, the Procolophon-like genus Thelognathus occurs
at Aliwal North with Cynodonts, and possibly Procolophon itself.
It seems not improbable that later work will further subdivide
the Triassic Beds, each zone counting from the point where a
new type begins, but before we can make any further advance
with confidence we require to have a much fuller knowledge of
the distribution of the fossils of the Upper and Middle Trias.
In the meantime I think we are safe in stating that Vytho-
saurus, Ictidopsis, and probably Galesaurus come from an older
zone than the Cynognathus beds. None of the known specimens
have been found near Burghersdorp, nor have any traces of
Lystrosaurus ever been found, from which we may conclude that
Lystrosaurus and probably these small Cynodonts became extinct
before Cynognathus appeared.
NyTHOSAURUS BROWNI, sp.n. (Pl. XCIII. fig. 23.)
This new species is founded on an imperfect lower jaw obtained
by Mr. Alfred Brown at Aliwal North. A large part of both
dentaries is present, but most of the symphyseal portion 1s missing
with the canines and incisors. Five molars are well preserved on
the left side and three on the right.
While in a number of respects the specimen differs from
Nythosaurus larvatus Owen, it seems probable from the position
of the symphysis that there were seven molars, and as in general
structure the molars agree with those of Vythosawrus larvatus, we
may consider it as probable that the species belongs to this genus.
The dentary differs from that of Vythosaurus larvatus in haying
a more slender horizontal ramus, in having a more marked angle,
and in the ascending ramus passing more upwards.
The molars preserved are probably the 3rd to the 7th. All
have three cusps. What is apparently the 3rd molar has the
median cusp short, and the others only feebly developed. In the
Ath and the other later molars the middle cusp is about twice as
long as the anterior and posterior cusps. In the second last
molar there is an additional small anterior cusp which gives it
four cusps, but there appear to be only three cusps in the last
molar. The five molars occupy 13°5 mm.
¥
:
:
t
«
NEW FOSSIL REPTILES. 875
Though the crowns of the molars resemble considerably those
of the Triconodont mammals there is the marked difference that
in Vythosaurus there is no trace of a cingulum, and there is
apparently only a simple root to each tooth.
AppEenpuM (29th July, 1912).—Since the above paper was
read evidence has been obtained which shows that the genus
Fndothiodon must be subdivided. Seeley twenty years ago
placed Hnrdothiodon uniseries in a distinct genus, Hsoterodon, and
until quite recently I have followed him in this. A fragmentary
maxilla recently found by Mr. Whaits shows that Seeley was
correct. In Hndothiodon bathystoma the teeth have long pointed
crowns with coarse serrations both in front and behind. In
Endothiodon uniseries the teeth have flattened crowns serrated
only behind, and in Hndothiodon platyceps there are no serrations
on either side. This latter point has been confirmed in a second
specimen. Until the crowns of the teeth of Hndothiodon whaitsi
are known we may provisionally place it with Hndothiodon unt-
series. ‘The group would thus be formed of
Endothiodon bathystoma Owen.
Esoterodon uniseries Owen.
Esoterodon whaitst Broom.
Emydochampsa platyceps Broom, gen. nov.
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.
PuLatE XC.
Side view of snout of Taurops macrodon Broom. Nearly 4 nat. size.
. Side view of tooth of probably Hecasaurus priscus Broom. Nat. size.
This tooth, though not associated with the type of Hecasaurus priscus,
is from the same horizon, and as it is the tooth of a Dinocephalian of
the sizeof Hecasaurus it very probably belongs to this genus and species.
Fig. 3. Upper view of tooth of probably Hecasaurus priscus Broom. Nat. size.
Fig. 4. Side view of skull of Scymnognathus whaitsi Broom. A little over 4 nat.
size. The skull is much flattened and distorted by crushing.
Fig. 5. Lower jaw of Scymnognathus whaitsi Broom. + nat. size. Though this
jaw is rather smaller than that of the type specimen it almost certainly
belongs to this species. It may have belonged to a young animal or to a
female. ‘The specimen is considerably crushed.
Pig.
Fig.
ire
Puate XCi.
Fig. 6. Side view of the skull of Galeops whaitsi Broom. Nat. size. The
specimen is slightly crushed and considerably weathered. ‘he orbital
margins and the preorbital portion of the skull and the lower jaw are the
outer surface of the bones viewed from within. The back portion of the
skull shows the quadrate and parts of the squamosal and opisthotic. A
sclerotic plate is seen in the orbit.
Fig. 7. Side view of snout of lurosaurus striatidens Broom. Nat. size. The
specimen is considerably crushed.
Fig. 8. Side view of snout of Pristerognathus platyrhinus Broom. 4%; nat. size.
9. Under view of snout and lower jaw of Alopecorhinus parvidens Broom.
42 nat. size.
Fig. 10. Upper view of imperfect skull of TIctidognathus hemburyi Broom.
Nat. size.
Wig. 11. Under view of snout of Ictidognathus hemburyi Broom. Nat. size.
876 PROF, S. J. HICKSON ON THE
PratEe XCII.
Fig. 12. Upper view of skull of Dicynodon laticeps Broom. 3% nat. size.
Fie. 13. Under view of snout of Dicynodon laticeps Broom. 5 nat. size.
Fig. 14. Side view of skull of Dicynodon lutriceps Broom. 7 nat. size. The
contact between the front part of the skull and the occiput is missing,
but the relation of the parts must be almost as restored.
Fig. 15. Upper view of skull of Dicynodon lutriceps Broom. About +5 nat. size.
Fie. 16. Palatal view of skull of Dicynodon lutriceps Broom. About 3; nat. size.
Fig. 17. Upper view of skull of Dicynodon psittacops Broom. About 5 nat. size.
Prate XCIII.
Fig. 18. Side view of skull of Hndothiodon whaitsi Broom. About 3 nat. size.
Fig.19. Upper view of lower jaw of EHndothiodon platyceps Broom. About 75
nat. size.
Vig. 20. Upper view of skull of Himadops minor Broom. # nat. size.
Fig. 21. Side view of skull of Prodicynodon beaufortensis Broom. About 7% nat.
size.
Fig. 22. Upper view of skull of Ictidopsis elegans Broom. % nat. size.
Fig. 23. Side view of left dentary of Nythosaurus browni Broom. % nat. size.
53. On the Hydrocoralline Genus, Hrrina. By Professor
S. J. Hickson, F.R.S., F.Z8., The University of
Manchester.
[ Received April 29, 1912: Read June 4, 1912.]
(Plates XCIV.—XCVI.)
INDEX.
Page
Revision of the genera Hrrina, Labiopora,
ESF OCC) CER” cise heen bciconbed Hap eeneeiida ale ar@andana aco iMcny
Description of new species ........... 882
Notes on the structure of Hrrina nove zelandie . 884
Note on geographical distribution ..................... 886
Description of old specieS ..........s00seeeeeeeeeeeeeess 887
General remarks on structure ...............0cceceeeseee 891
Dist of Known Species ......-.....ccncosseeeeneereeseencee 898
Additiowall motes eri... scc-weseee.deeeheseeeeeeeereeeeeaeee BOO
Diteratinre 28 ee a es Seen een Oa
Explanation of the Plates ...........:..0ceeseseseeeeees 895
Four years ago Professor Benham sent to me some specimens
of Stylasterina from New Zealand, with a request that I would
name them for him. At the same time he forwarded some notes
and drawings which have proved to be of considerable assistance
to me in working out their details. I am also indebted to
Professor Dendy for the loan of another specimen also from New
Zealand ; to the late Mr. Morgan, of Worthing, for the loan of a
specimen from an unknown locality; and to Mr. Gilchrist for
a specimen from the Cape of Good Hope.
All these specimens clearly belong to one of three genera,
Errina, Labiopora or Spinipora, as they exhibit the characters
that these genera exhibit in common and by which they can be
separated from other Stylasterina. These characters are: (1) a
12 eS) USM ey EIU DAGIRVG
Huth, coll.
IB NOC ME OIUIOS) (Ou ISU (GOR IN WS) 9 Ie IaMe UN ZANE
PZ ow ole ER exCve
7. By
Huth, coll.
HYDEROIDS OF THE GENUS HRAINA-.
Huth Lith? London,
HYD HOD S )On Sitti Grit) > sini iN AG
JB) AS slic Vety eae, ee Nvaly,
a) wee
fh a he. Ho
HYDROCORALLINE GENUS ERRINA. 877
style in the Gasteropores ; (2) no style in the Dactylopores; and
(3) the Dactylopores, or some of the Dactylopores, guarded by a
grooved lip or spine—called by Moseley the “ nariform process.”
To any one acquainted with Moseley’s classical memoir of the
Stylasterina (8), and with the subsequent literature, which is not
very extensive, it might seem a simple matter to determine
whether the specimens about to be described belong to any one
of the three genera or not; because, according to Moseley’s
descriptions, the following characters were diagnostic :—
Errina, with only one kind of Dactylopore.
Labiopora, with two kinds of Dactylopores. The larger kind
of dactylopore with a nariform process * and arranged in
rows. The smaller kind of dactylopore, without a nari-
form process, arranged between the rows.
Spinipora, also with two kinds of Dactylopores. The larger
kind of dactylopore with long grooved spines, not arranged
in rows. The smaller kind of dactylopore at the base of
the larger ones.
Moseley’s memoir was published in 1881, and since that date
only four new species of Hrrina and one new species of Labiopora
(Z. moseleyi) have been described; but owing to the rarity
of these Hydrocorallines in the seas that have been recently
investigated, very little progress has been made in our knowledge
of them.
The specimens from New Zealand and elsewhere that I have
examined convinced me that a thorough revision of the genera
was necessary, and consequently the task of naming Professor
Benham’s specimens has taken me much longer than J anticipated,
The general results of my investigations have been to show that
the limits or frontiers between the three genera are ill-defined
and that it is necessary to accept von Marenzeller’s (6) proposal
to unite Labiopora with Hrrina.
In the first place, I have found, as von Marenzeller (6) has
done, that the presence of two kinds of dactylopores is not a very
reliable character; because in some forms that are otherwise
closely related the dactylopores of the smaller kind that have no
grooved spines may be numerous, scarce, or altogether absent
(e. g., Hrrina nove zelandie). A genus such as Labiopora
cannot therefore be absolutely separated from Hrrina by the
character of the dimorphism of the dactylozooids.
Moreover, the arrangement of the grooved spines in definite
rows is another character that is subject to considerable variations
and cannot be relied upon for diagnostic purposes. The arrange-
ment of these processes seems to be correlated in some way with
the method of growth of the hydrophytum as a whole, and that
is again, I believe, dependent upon the conditions of the en-
vironment.
* The term “nariform process’ introduced by Moseley is not very convenient, and
I have consequently used the the expression “grooved spine” for the ccoenosteal
processes that shelter the dactylozooids.
878 PROF, S. J. HICKSON ON THE
The characters that appear to me of more importance and to
signify a more profound differentiation are based upon :—
1. The texture of the surface of the corallum.
2. The aspect of the grooves in the nariform processes.
Moseley described the surface of Hrrina as composed of a
coinpact, hard, glistening, white, caleareous tissue, and he adds
that the canals generally are in this genus larger in proportion to
the size of the zooids than in most other forms, and the mesh-
works formed by them are comparatively wide open. Associated
with these two characters we usually find that the surface is
marked by shallow longitudinal grooves perforated by a series
of small apertures through which the vertical canals pass. These
cceenosteal pores are well defined in the species of this group that
I have examined, and in the type specimens of E. labiata and
LH. ramosa they are about ‘05 mm, in diameter. The surface of
Spinipora is hard and compact as in Errina, and it is also
perforated by well defined ccenosteal pores.
In the original description of the genus Labiopora, Moseley
describes the ccenosteum as being “‘ minutely reticulate in tex-
ture,” and in the description of Labiepora moseleyi Ridley (10)
also describes the surface as being ‘‘ minutely reticulate.” In all
the specimens I have examined there is a very marked contrast
between the surface of the specimens now included in the Zabio-
pore group of species and of those I propose to retain in the
Hrring group.
I should prefer to describe the surface of the former group of
species as being “ granular” rather than “reticulate.” In Hrrina
(Labiopora) capensis it is coarsely granular and in all the other
species of the group it is minutely granular (cf Pl. XCVI.
figs. 14 & 15). Below the surface, the ccenosteum is minutely
reticulate, being perforated by a network of small-meshed canal
passages (fig. 14), in contrast with the wide-meshed canal
passages of the Hrrina group.
As regards the grooved spines. In the following species that
I have examined the groove in the spine that protects a dactylo-
pore is turned towards the apex of the branch on which it is
situated: HH. labiata, HL. horrida, and EL. ramosa. The groove has
the same aspect in Z. glabra and HL. carinata, if we may judge
from the figures given by Pourtales (9).
In the only two specimens of the genus Spinipora that are
known the grooves also turn towards the apex of the branch
(Pl. XCV. fig. 8). In the Zabiopora group of species there is
considerable variation in the direction of the grooves. In some
of them, all or nearly all the grooves are turned away from the
apex (Pl. XCVI. fig. 11), but in others the grooves are turned
in all directions, the grooved spines forming irregular clusters on
the surface (Pl. XCVI. figs. 12 & 13). The same arrangement of
the grooves occurs in Hrrina gracilis and in Hrrina macrogastra,
according to von Marenzeller, who writes “‘ Ihre Oeffnung ist
nach hinten gerichtet, selten seitlich” (5), and also in Hrrine
jissurata of Gray (2).
~~.
HYDROCORALLINE GENUS ERRINA, 879
Taking these characters as guides it seemed to me that the
diagnostic characters of the three genera might be stated as
follows :—
(a) Ceenosteum hard and compact, perforated by well-
defined ccenosteal pores. Grooved spines turned
towards the apex of the branch.
1. With short grooved spines and only one kind of
daicty lope nee ny Ae) 225/00) shi Reena Errina.
2. With long grooved spines and two kinds of
GaiCtylOMOMestMaan seas cide Medes ct ttdae teeta or Spinipora.
(6) Coenosteum granular and reticulate, without well-
defined coenosteal pores. Grooved spines turned
away from the apex of the branches or irregularly
TIAGO CK Trac vaaeRieeate tase Sot uwMioe sled shlcroiald ectuanclanle Labiopora.
If the three genera be joined together to form a subfamily, the
Errinina, this subfamily might be defined as follows :—
Hydrophytum arborescent and irregularly flabelliform, gastero-
pores and dactylopores not arranged in cyclosystems. Gastero-
pores with a large brush-like style. Dactylopores without a
style. Some of the dactylopores protected by a grooved spine
(narial process) on the surface of the coenosteum,
This arrangement of the genera, however, breaks down on
further analysis, and I see no cther course than to arrange all the
species in three groups under the one generic name Lrrina.
The genus Hrrina was founded by Gray in 1835 for a species
of coral found in the Mediterranean Sea and formerly called
Millepora aspera by Linneus.
As von Marenzeller has pointed out, Gray’s description of the
spines in this species as *‘Superne longitudinaliter fisse” is not
consistent with the description of the species known to Linneus
and Esper.
I have examined the type specimens in the British Museum,
and have found that Gray’s description is not correct. The
spines in these specimens are irregular in arrangement, but where
they are isolated and not in clusters the groove is directed away
from the apex. Moreover, the character of the surface of the
ccoenosteum, the presence of a few small dactylopores without
grooved spines, and other features prove that this species is more
closely related to the type species of Labiopora than it is to any
of the other species of Hrrina.
According to the system I had, at first, proposed the type
species of Hrrima would thus be a species of Labiopora and
Moseley’s Hrrina ramosa would become the type species of the
genus. 3
Such a proposal, therefore, would not only be contrary to the
rule of zoological nomenclature, but it would also be extremely
inconvenient. Moreover, one species at least (#. macrogastra)
would occupy an intermediate position, having a surface similar
880 PROF. S. J. HICKSON ON THE
to that of Hrrina and grooved spines similar to those of
Labdiopora.
A plea might still be made to keep the genus Spinipora distinct,
but I am convinced that intermediate forms will be found
between the deep-sea species of Hrrinw and the only known
species of Spintpora, and that sooner or later it will be found
impossible to keep it apart from the others.
In the following pages, therefore, I have regarded all the
species that have been attributed to the three genera as belonging
to the one genus, Hrrina of Gray, but for convenience of welievemce
I have added after the generic name (Labiopora) or (L.) in the
case of those species that were formerly described as belonging to
the genus Labiepora and to others that belong to that group of
species, and (Spinipora) or (S.) in the case of Hrrina echinata, the
only known species of the Spinipora group.
Genus Errina Gray.
With the characters of the subfamily Errinina (p. 879).
The “ Hrrina” group of species.
Cenosteum hard and compact, perforated at the surface by
well-defined ccenosteal pores usually arranged in rows in shallow
longitudinal surface-grooves. Gasteropores with or without a
scale. All the dactylopores protected by short grooved spines
(narial processes) with the grooves turned towards the apex of
the branch.
The only species of this group that have been sufficiently well
described to make identification possible without reference to the
type specimens, are Hrrina labiata Moseley and H. ramosa
Hickson & England and #. horrida H. & HK. Other species
are LHrrina carinata Pourtales and #. pourtalesii Dall.
Pourtales in 1871 described three species, which at first he placed
in the genus Hrrina but subsequently transferred them to a new
genus, Lepidopora. These species were referred back again to
Errina by Moseley. Their names are /#. glabra, E. cochleata, and
EH. dabneyi. ‘These three species were distinguished from Hrrina
by the presence of a lip or lid-like process similar to that of
Cryptohelia hanging over the gasteropores. Wrrina fissurata of
Gray may have been a specimen of Labiopora, but as the original
specimen hag been lost it is useless to speculate on its supposed
affinities.
The species may be arranged as follows :—
* q@. Gasteropores with a definite lip or scale :—
Li. glabra, EL. cochleata, H. dabneyi, and EL. ramosa.
6. Gasteropores in the angles formed by the branches :—
L. horrida.
e. Gasteropores without scales and distributed on the surface
of the coenosteum :—
L. labiata, FE. carinata, FL. pourtalesii (?).
* See Note p. 894.
HYDROCORALLINE GENUS ERRINA. 881i
As regards the distribution it may be said that all the species
are inhabitants of deep water (?. e. 50-600 fathoms). Being
deep-sea species they are probably widely distributed, but at
present H. pourtalesii, H. ramosa, and HL. horrida have only been
found in the Pacific Ocean and Malay Archipelago, and the
remaining species in the Atlantic Ocean.
Spinipora group of species.
Coonosteum hard and compact, perforated at the surface by
well-defined ccenosteal pores usually arranged in shallow branching
grooves irregularly arranged on the surface. Gasteropores
without a scale. Dactylopores of two kinds. The larger kind
being guarded by long grooved spines (narial processes) crowded
and overlapping on the terminal branches, often worn down
short and separated by considerable intervals on the stems and
older branches (Pl. XCV. fig. 8). All the grooves of these
spines turned towards the apex of the branch. Smaller dactylo-
pores not protected by grooved spines, but scattered between and
on the projections that guard the larger dactylopores.
The Spinipora group is represented by only one species,
Errina (S.) echinata Moseley, and this species has been found off
Rio de la Plata in 600 fathoms by the ‘ Challenger ’ Expedition,
and off Providence Island in the Indian Ocean in 75 fathoms by
Professor Stanley Gardiner (4).
Labiopora group of species.
Ceenosteum granular and minutely reticulate, without clearly
defined ccenosteal pores. Gasteropores without scales but some-
times protected by short grooved projections or “lips.” Dactylo-
pores protected by grooved spines of variable lengths, the grooves
turned away from the apex of the branch or irregularly in all
directions. Some of the dactylopores usually without grooved
spines.
The species of this group that have been described already
are Hrrina aspera Gray, Hrrina (Labiopora) antarctica Gray,
Errina (L.) moseleyit Ridley, and Hrrina gracilis von Maren-
zeller.
Errina aspera was the name given by Gray to the Linnean
species Millepora aspera from the Mediteranean Sea. Hrrina (L.)
antarcticé was originally described by Gray as a Polyzoon
(Porella antarctica), but was subsequently redeseribed and figured
by Moseley as the type species of Labiopora. The type specimen
was found off the Hast coast of Tierra del Fuego, but a second’
specimen was discovered by the ‘ Alert’ Expedition in 30 fathoms
off 8.W. Chili and described by Ridley (10). Hina (L.) mose-
leyi was found by the ‘ Alert’ Expedition off the same cosat in
2-10 fathoms. Hrrina gracilis was found off the pack ice in the
Antarctic Ocean in deep water (von Marenzeller) (6).
I have had an opportunity of carefully examining a piece of
882 PROF. S. J. HICKSON ON THE
the type specimen of Hrrina (L.) antarctica and comparing it
with the specimens from various localities mentioned at the
beginning of this paper. I have found, as I expected, the same
difficulties in the determination of species that are met with in
the systematic zoology of other zoophytes. My impression is
that all the specimens from New Zealand belong to one distinct
species, that the specimen from the Cape of Good Hope belongs
to another distinct species, and that both these species are distinet
from the four species that have already been described. But
there is so much variation in the specimens from New Zealand
that it is clearly desirable to have a careful description of each.
T have also added for convenience’ sake a new description of the
two earlier species for comparison.
Errina (LABIOPORA) NOVH ZELANDI#. (Facies Ramosa.) (PI.
XiODVi te noi Plex NEES fig. 9>)
This specimen was obtained from Preservation Inlet, W. coast of
South Island of New Zealand, in about 3 fms. of water, and was
lent by the Canterbury Museum to Prof. Benham. The colony
is flabelliform, with profuse ramification but without anastomoses.
The terminal branches are usually delicate. This may be ex-
pressed in figures by saying that at a distance of 3 mm. from the
extremity of a terminal branch the diameter may be not more
than 1mm. The larger branches are slightly compressed in the
plane of the flabellum ; the others circular in section.
Colour : salmon- pink*,
Surface minutely granular, substance of the ccenosteum
minutely reticulate.
Grooved spines (narial processes) numerous, arranged in rows,
rarely in clusters. The groove, in nearly all cases, turned directly
away from the apex of the branch.
Gasteropores more numerous on one side of the flabellum than
on the other, sometimes provided with a lip. Diameter of gas-
teropores 0°27 mm.
Large dactylopores 0°06 x 0:16 mm. (The large kind of dactylo-
pores of the genus are protected by the grooved spines, and the
measurements given indicate approximately the width x depth of
the groove at its deepest part.)
Small dactylopores rare or absent. The small dactylopores are
often difficult to determine until the coral is thoroughly cleaned
by boiling in eau de javelle. JI have examined and re-examined
a small. branch thus cleaned and can find no small dactylopores,
but as I have only a small amount of material at my disposal,
and as Benham states in his MS. notes that the small dactylo-
pores are “ rare,’ I cannot deny their existence.
* There are so many shades of red to be found in corals that I have used the
technical term which expresses the shade of red that comes nearest to that shown
by this coral,
HYDROCORALLINE GENUS ERRINA. 883
Errina (LABIopORA) NOV# ZELANDIZ. (Facies Benhami.)
(PI. XCIV. figs. 1 & 2;.Pl. XCVLI. fig. 13.)
This specimen was also found in Preservation Inlet and lent to
Prof. Benham by the Colonial Museum. One branch of this
specimen was well preserved in spirit. Thecolony is flabelliform,
with profuse ramification and abundant anastomoses. The
terminal branches are thick, the diameter of such a branch at a
distance of 3 mm. from the extremity being about 3mm. All
the branches are approximately circular in section.
Colour : salmon-pink.
Surface minutely granular and substance minutely reticulate.
Grooved spines numerous, arranged roughly in rows. These
spines are more numerous and longer than in the facies ‘‘ Ramosa.”
They are, moreover, frequently arranged in clusters, so that they
have the appearance of ‘branched spines” (fig. 13). The
grooves are in general turned away from the apex, but when
the projections are clustered they turn in all directions.
Gasteropores equally numerous on the two sides of the flabellum.
Without a lp. Diameter varying considerably from 0:13 mm.
to 0°17 mm.
Large dactylopores 0:06 x 0°16 mm.
Small dactylopores not infrequent, 0°05 mm. in diameter.
Errina (LABIOPORA) NOV ZELANDI®, (Facies Dendyi.)
(Pl. XCIV. fig. 4.)
This specimen was obtained in Milford Sound, W. coast of
South Island, and was lent to me by Professor Dendy.
It is not very profusely branched, but probably has a flabelli-
form mode of growth. ‘The terminal branches are delicate and
of approximately the same diameter as.those of facies “‘ Ramosa.”
There are no anastomoses in the specimen.
Colour: salmon-pink.
The surface is minutely granular and the substance minutely
reticular.
Grooved spines not very crowded but quite irregularly disposed,
not in rows, never in clusters. The groove in all cases turned
away from the apex of the branches.
Gasteropores on both sides of the branches but rather more
numerous on one side than the other. Usually guarded by a
small lip. Diameter 0°22 mm.
Large dactylopores 0:06 x 0-11 mm.
Small dactylopores 0:05 mm. in diameter, usually guarded by a
shallow collar or lip.
A feature of this specimen that should be mentioned is the
suppression of the spines on the larger branches. Only the
terminal branches are echinate.
884 PROF. §. J. HICKSON ON THE
Errina (LABIOPORA) Nova ZELANDIZ. (Facies Cooki.)
(PITACYV. figs 55 Pl PO Vals testa Oils iale2/3)
This specimen was obtained from the cable in Cook Straits
between the two islands of New Zealand, and was lent to
Professor Benham by the Colonial Museum. According to
Professor Benham’s notes, two specimens were obtained, one
being 50 mm. in height x 70 mm. across, and has six main
branches; the other is smaller, 30 mm. in height x60 mm.
across. The general form of the ccenosteum is flabellate, the
main axis flattened but the branches circular in section. The
branches do not anastomose in the specimen examined. Only a
small piece of one of these colonies was sent to me, and from
that I have drawn up the following notes.
Colour: pure white.
Surface and substance as in the other facies.
Grooved spines not very crowded and not arranged in definite
rows, frequently in clusters with the grooves pointing in all
directions (fig. 12).
Gasteropores evenly distributed on both sides of the flabellum,
without any lip or collar, 0°22 mm. in diameter.
Large dactylopores 0-06 x 0:08 mm.
Small dactylopores rare or very rare, 0°09 mm. in diameter.
In comparing these four facies of the species, several points of
interest may be observed.
They all agree in the general texture of the ccenosteum, and
they all have a more or less flabellate form of growth.
As regards the size of the hydrophytum as a whole, it is
impossible, owing to the broken condition of all the specimens
examined, to give exact measurements. A specimen of uncertain
facies in the Colonial Museum is 90 mm. x 70 mm. (according to
the MS. notes of Professor Benham), the specimen of the facies
‘“‘Cooki” was 50 mm. in height x 70 mm. in expanse. Judging
from these figures and from the size of the branches of the other
specimens, it seems probable that the normal size of a full-grown
specimen of the species is not more than 100 mm. x 100 mm., or
that, in words, it is a coral that does not normally attain a very
large size.
Of the other characters, perhaps the most important one to
consider is the dimorphism of the dactylopores, because this cha-
racter has been used as a diagnostic character for the separation
of the genera Labiopora and Hrrina. In the facies ‘‘ Benhami ”
and ‘ Dendyi” there are clearly many small dactylopores lying
on the general surface of the ccenosteum between the grooved
spines and distinct from the larger dactylopores. In the facies
‘““ Ramosa” no such dactylopores could be found in the specimen
J examined (although Professor Benham says they are rare), and
in the facies ‘‘ Cooki” they are certainly very rare. With the
many points of resemblance in form, colour, size of pores, etc.
between the two facies ‘“‘ Ramosa ” and ‘ Benham,” it would be
HYDROCORALLINE GENUS ERRINA. 885
very rash to propose that they should be separated into distinct
species on account of this one character.
It seems to me, therefore, that the presence of small dactylo-
pores in addition to the dactylopores of the ordinary type, in
other words, the character of dimorphism in the dactylopores, is
not a character that should be regarded as absolutely diagnostic
either of the genus or of any one of its species.
As regards the gasteropores there seem to be some variations.
In “ Benhami” the gasteropores vary considerably in diameter
from 0:13-0:17 mm., but in “‘ Ramosa,” ** Cooki,” and ** Dendyi”
they are more constant in diameter, being 0°27 mm. in the first
named, and 0°22 mm. in the latter. It is probable that these
figures are not of much value for systematic purposes. There
are many technical difficulties in the way of making accurate
measurements of the mouths of a large number of gasteropores
on any single specimen, and unless the average diameter of a
large number of gasteropores of one specimen can be compared
with similar averages from other specimens of the same facies or
species, the figures given simply represent a statement of fact
concerning a given specimen. The real value of the figures I
have given is that they prove that the diameter of the gastero-
pores is a variable quantity and cannot be used, except in a very
general way, as a guide to the determination of species. One
point of rather special interest is that in the facies “‘ Ramosa ”
with slender terminal branches the gasteropores appear to be
actually larger than they are in ‘ Benhami” with thicker terminal
branches. This seems to indicate that there is no relation
between the thickness of the branches and the size of the gastero-
pores, since the expectation would be that the stouter terminal
branches would bear the larger gasteropores.
The presence of a raised margin on one side of the gasteropores
in some of the specimens of this species is a feature of some
general interest. Im some of the gasteropores of the facies
‘“‘Ramosa” these processes are of considerable size, and bending
over the pore have an appearance very similar to the lid of a
Cryptohelia. In ‘** Dendyi” they are rudimentary, but in the
other specimens they are absent.
The presence of a definite lip or scale on the edge of the gastero-
pore, it must be remembered, was the principal character relied
upon by Pourtales for the separation of the genus Lepidopora
from the genus Hrrina, but if we accept Moseley’s view that the
species of Lepidopora should be incorporated with Hrrina, then
we have a parallel series of variations as regards this character in
the Hrrina group, to that in the Labiopora group.
At one time I thought that the difference in the length of the
grooved spines (nariform processes) might be a useful character
for the separation of the species in this genus. In all the speci-
mens, however, I found that the projections on the young actively
growing terminal branches are longer than they are on the older
branches, and consequently there is a difficulty in fixing a standard
Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1912, No. LIX. 59
886 PROF, S. J. HICKSON ON THE
of measurement for comparison. Taking the measurement of a
few of the projections at a distance of about 3 mm. from the apex
of the branches, I have found that the average is in ‘ Benhami”
0:7 mm., and in “ Dendyi” 0:4 mm., the projections i in “ Ramosa ”
and ‘*Cooki” being intermediate in size between these two
measurements. The differences between these averages are so
small, and the difficulty of avoiding a relatively large error in the
calculation is so great, that the measurements are of no more
scientific value than to express roughly the general impression of
observation that the projections are longest in ‘“ Benhami,”
shortest in “‘ Dendyi,” and of medium length in other specimens.
The longest projections in ‘‘ Benhami” are, however, not simple
nariform processes as they are usually in the other facies, but
groups of two, three or four of these processes clustered together
(fig. 13). The clustering together of the grooved projections
may be seen in some of the other facies, such as ‘‘ Ramosa” and
“ Cooki,’ but it is never such a pronounced feature as it is in
“* Benhami.”
Lastly, a word about geographical distribution. All the
specimens were dredged off the coast of New Zealand, and two of
these four were found in the same bay (Preservation Inlet).
There is every reason to believe, moreover, that they were all
found in shallow water. In my opinion these facts have some
weight in determining the question whether the specimens
should be placed in one species or in several species. In a rare
genus such as Hrrina, species found at widely separated localities
will in all probability be affected by their isolation and show
differences that entitle them to rank as distinct species, but
there is much less probability that the genus would be able to
develop or to maintain specific differences in the same waters.
Unless, therefore, a very clear case is made out that the dif-
ferences between the specimens of the genus Hrrina from New
Zealand waters are constant or of fundamental importance, the
most convenient as well as most scientific course to pursue is to
place them together in the same species.
Errina (LABIOPORA) CAPENSIS, sp. n. (PI. XCV. fig. 7;
Pl. XCVI. fig. 15.)
This species is represented in my collection by three broken
terminal branches. The largest piece is 36 mm. in length, the
diameter at the base is 7 mm., and the diameter of the branch
3 mm. from the apex is 45 mm. In the largest specimen of
the New Zealand species (‘‘ Dendyi”) the diameter at the base
(evidently the base of attachment) is 6 mm., and the diameter of
a branch 3 mm. from the apex is only 2 mm.
From these facts it seems probable that in this species the
hydrophytum reaches to much greater dimensions than does that
of the New Zealand species.
The branches terminate in blunt, slightly flattened and ex-
panded extremities.
HYDROCORALLINE GENUS ERRINA. 887
The hydrophytum is probably flabellate in growth, the ramifi-
cation not very profuse and anastomoses rare.
Colour: salmon-pink,
Surface coarsely granular and substance coarsely reticulate.
As this species seems to approach the Zrrina group in some
respects, attention may be called to the striking difference there
is between the coarsely granular character of its surface and the
fine smooth porcellanous character of the surface of the Hrrina
group.
Grooved spines very short, numerous, quite irregular in arrange-
ment and never in clusters. The form of the spine is that of a
shallow semicircular ridge open on the side turned away from the
apex.
Gasteropores equally distributed on both sides of the branches,
never provided with a lip. Diameter 0°3 mm.
Large dactylopores about 0°25 mm. in diameter.
Small dactylopores:—It may be open to discussion whether
there is or is not any true dimorphism of the dactylopores in this
species. It has been shown that in one of the specimens from
New Zealand (‘“‘ Dendyi”) the small dactylopores are provided
with shallow collars. In the Cape specimen some of the dactylo-
pores are considerably less in diameter than the majority, but
they are provided with exactly the same kind of semicircular
ridge as the larger ones. The question of dimorphism, therefore,
resolves itself in this case into a question whether the essential
feature of the dimorphism of the dactylopores consists in their
size or in the presence of a grooved spine. Ridley states that in
Errina (Labiopora) moseleyi the dactylopores are of the usual
uniform size, and the two kinds can only be distinguished by the
presence or absence of nariform processes. These facts seem to
emphasize the conclusion that the so-called dimorphism of the
dactylopores is not really a feature of very great importance, and
to suggest as a probability that the small dactylopores are the
shelters for young dactylozooids which in their later stages of
growth increase in size and become protected by a grooved spine.
The specimen described and figured by Gray (1872) as Hrrina
jissurata, from the Antarctic seas, was apparently very closely
related to this species. Unfortunately the specimen has been
mislaid (jide Moseley) and cannot therefore be re-examined, but
the figures show a similar robust habit of growth and short semi-
circular grooved spines with the grooves all turned away from the
apex of the branch.
Errina (LABIOPORA) ANTARCTICA Gray.
Porella antarctica Gray.
Labiopora antarctica Moseley.
Labiopora antarctica Ridley.
The type-specimen was found off the Falkland Islands,
54° 27'8., 59° 40’ W., in 45 fathoms. 1
A second specimen, attributed to this species by Ridley, was
found in Trinidad Channel, 8.W. Chili, in 30 fathoms.
Dos
888 PROF. S. J. HICKSON ON THE
Hydrophytum flabellate in growth. There is no statement to
the effect that the branches anastomose. No record of size
beyond the statement that it is smaller than L. moseleyi.
Colour: bright crimson, with the compressed forked tips paler.
Surface minutely reticulate. Grooved spines arranged in rows,
but not in clusters, on both sides of the branches, all turned away
from the apex of the branch.
Gasteropores without a lip, 0°22 mm. in diameter (in the Chili
specimen).
Large dactylopores 0:09 x 0:2 mm.
Small dactylopores 0°08 mm., without any lip or collar.
Errina (LABIoporA) MOSELEYI Ridley.
The single specimen of this species was found at Port Rosario,
S.W. Chili, 2-10 fathoms.
Hydrophyture flabellate in growth. Anastomoses frequent.
95 mm. in height x 185 mm. in width.
Colour : ‘ vermilion.”
“An anterior clearly distinguishable from a posterior surface,
by the development on it of numerous tubercles, chiefly in the
terminal branches, which are very slightly indicated in the latter.”
Surface minutely reticulate. Grooved spines not arranged in
definite rows nor in clusters.
Gasteropores without any lip, 0°32 to 0°35 mm. in diameter.
Large dactylopores 0°1 to 0:14 mm. in longitudinal diameter.
Small dactylopores without lips or tubercles, of about the same
size as the large dactylopores.
Errina (Lapropora) AspERA Linn. (Pl. XCV. fig. 6.)
I have examined the type-specimen of this species in the
British Museum on which Gray (1) founded the genus Hrrina.
There can be no doubt that the affinities of the species with the
genotype of Labiopora are closer than they are with Moseley’s
Errina labiata. It belongs to the ZLabiopora, and not to the
Errina group of species.
One of the colonies in the British Museum is 80 mm. in height
by 85 mm. in width. It forms a flabellum with a clear difference
between the anterior and posterior surfaces. The branches
terminate in fine points and do not anastomose. The branches
are about 3 mm. in diameter at a distance of 3 mm. from the
apices. The surface is minutely granular. The grooved spines
sometimes occur in clusters, but when solitary the grooves are
turned away from the apex of the branch. There are a few small
dactylopores without spines and some with small or rudimentary
spines. This specimen was dredged off the coast of Sicily.
A little while ago a specimen of a Stylasterine coral was sent
to me by the late Mr. John Morgan of Worthing. It was
purchased in a sale and there was no record of its locality.
At first I thought it should be placed with the other specimens
HYDROCGORALLINE GENUS ERRINA. 889
in my collection in the species Hrrina (L.) nove zelandie, but,
on comparing it with the specimens in the British Museum, I
came to the conclusion that it is probably related more closely to
Erriva (L.) aspera. Itis moderately branched and roughly flabelli-
form in growth. ‘The terminal branches are fairly thick, being
about 2—2°25 mm, at a distance of 3 mm. from the apex. The
branches do not anastomose.
The surface and substance of the cenosteum are minutely
granular.
The grooved spines are very crowded and clustered on the
terminal branches, and not arranged in rows (fig. 6). The
grooves are turned in all directions, but the majority of them
away from the apex of the branch.
The gasteropores are equally distributed on both sides of the
flabellum, and are without any lip or collar. Size 0-13-0:17 mm.
in diameter.
The large dactylopores are very variable in size, ‘09 x -09 mm.
to -06 x 0:11 mm.
The small dactylopores are very numerous, 0°06 mm. in
diameter, and provided with small curved lips.
The specimen is like the type in being white in colour,
Mr. Morgan’s specimen differs from the type in having rather
more slender branches, in having the pores equally distributed
on the two surfaces of the flabellum, and in the presence of
numerous small dactylopores.
Errina (LABIOPORA) GRACILIS von Marenzeller.
Several specimens of this species were found by the ‘ Belgica’
Expedition attached to the swabs when dredging off the pack ice
in the region of 71°S. and 88° W., z.e. about 20 degrees west
and 15 degrees south of the Straits of Magellan. The depth
is not recorded by von Marenzeller, but it is probably between
500 and 600 metres.
The hydrophytum is flabellate in growth, with well-marked
anterior and posterior surfaces. One of the specimens, which
proved to bea female, was 25 mm. in height and 30 mm. in width.
Another, which proved to be a male, was 100 mm. by 140 mm.
The surface of the ccenosteum is finely wrinkled, and marked
with transverse and longitudinal ridges (Kammschen). There are
apparently no well- marked comnosteal pores.
Grooved spines not arranged in definite rows, but in irregular
clusters or singly. The grooves of the grooved spines turned
away from the apex of the branches or sideways.
Gasteropores with a lip, :015 mm. in width.
Large dactylopores sheltered by spinous projections provided
with a deep groove.
Small dactylopores with or without a lip.
Colour: white or brownish.
There can be little doubt that this species belongs to the
890 PROF. §. J. HICKSON ON THE
Labiopora group. It is true that the description given by von
Marenzeller of the surface of the ccoenosteum does not agree with
that of the other species of the group, but it does not agree either
with the description given of the surface of the coonosteum of the
Hrrina group. The absence of well-defined ccenosteal pores, the
grouping of some of the grooved spines in clusters, and the direc-
tion of their grooves—all point to the affinities of the species with
the Labiopora group.
It may be remarked that this is the only species of the group
that oecurs in deep water.
Review of the Labiopora Group of Species.
The careful examination of the specimens belonging to the
Labiopora group leads me to the conclusion that there are very
few characters that can be used with much confidence for the
separation of species *. However, it may be convenient for the
present to recognise six species :—
Hrrina (Labiopora) aspera Linn. Mediterranean Sea.
Lrrina (Labiopora) antarctica Gray. Chili and Falkland Islands.
30 to 45 fathoms.
Lrrina (Labiopora) moseleyi Ridley. Chili. Shallow water.
Lrrina (Labiopora) nove zelandie Wickson. New Zealand.
Shallow water.
Lrrina (Labiopora) capensis Hickson. Cape of Good Hope.
30 fathoms.
Lirrina (Labiopora) gracilis von Marenzeller. Antarctic Sea.
Deep water.
Of these six species Hrrina (Labiopora) capensis appears to be
the most sharply defined. It probably attains to a much larger
size, has more robust branches terminating in blunt and some-
what flattened extremities. Its substance is coarsely reticular
and its surface coarsely granuiar. The grooved spines are short
and semicircular in shape. All the dactylopores are guarded by
these spines.
The other five species are very closely related. Hyrina (L.) ant-
arctica appears to be distinguished from the others by the grooved
spines being arranged in definite rows, and Hrrina (L.) moseleyi
by the differentiation of an anterior from a posterior surface
of the flabellum. Of Hrrina (L.) nove zelandie all that ean
be said is that 1t appears to be a very variable species which
does not exhibit any one particular distinguishing feature.
Errina (L.) gracilis is distinguished from the others by the
texture of the surface of the ceenosteum, and the colour is not
red but white or brownish. Hrrina(L.) aspera has a close resem-
blance to some of the facies of Hrrina (L.) nove zealandie, but
it is always white in colour, in this respect resembling the facies
* Cooki.”
* See Note, p. 894.
HYDROCORALLINE GENUS ERRINA. 891
General Remarks on Structure.
Gasteropores.—Before concluding this account of these species
I may refer briefly to one or two results of a negative character
that I have obtained. It occurred to me that if the speci-
mens J examined belonged to different species, there might be
some measurable difference to be observed in the styles of the
gasteropores. The style is in all cases lke an elongated and
sharply pointed brush, but careful and constantly repeated com-
parisons of the styles of the gasteropores of different specimens
revealed no characters by which they could be distinguished.
The type of style is the same in all the specimens, and although
the brush is more slender in some cases than in others, there is a
greater range of variation in this respect in the gasteropores of
a single specimen than there is in the gasteropores of different
specimens taken at random (Pl. XCV1. figs. 14 & 15).
The way in which it is possible to study the shape of the
gasteropore styles is to make a vertical fracture in a plane parallel
with the long axis of a branch. Ina large percentage of such
fractures the whole length of at least one gasteropore with its
style will be exposed.
In such fractures it may be observed that some of the gastero-
pores extend as far down as the axis of the branch, but in others
they extend only a short distance below the surface. In the long
gasteropores the style can be traced right down to the base of the
pore, but it is usually supported by one or, in some rare cases,
more than one, tabula (fig. 14) similar to the tabulee described by
Miss England (5) in the gasteropores of Spinipora. In the short
gasteropores the style ends abruptly at the base of the pore and
is not supported by a tabula (fig. 15).
In order to make any scientific use of this character in the
classification of the species 1t would be necessary to make a large
number of fractures, and for that purpose I have not sufficient
material.
The results I have obtained on the few fractures I have made
are as follows :—
In Errina (L.) nove zelandie facies ‘“‘ Ramosa” and facies
‘“Cooki” the gasteropores (I have observed) are long and exhibit
atabula. In the same species facies “ Benhami” the gasteropor es
are short, and the same is the case in the facies “ Dendyi.” In
Mr. Morgan’s specimen of Hrrina (L.) aspera the gasteropore is
also short. In Krrina (L.) capensis the gasteropores are short,
extending only a little way beneath the surface. As to this
character in the gasteropores of the other species I have no
evidence to bring forward.
My conclusions, from this evidence, are that the length of the
gasteropores and the presence or absence of a tabula are not, at
present, characters of any value for purposes of classification.
Gonophores.—All the specimens | have examined show ampulle.
They can usually be seen on the terminal branches as shallow
892 PROF. 8. J. HICKSON ON THE
convexities on the surface, sometimes between the spines, some-
times carrying the spines with them. They appear to be always
absent in the older branches and stems. Our knowledge is still
so very imperfect concerning the growth and relations of the
gonophores in the Stylasterina that it is not reasonable to use any
differences that may be observed in the characters of the ampulle
for purposes of classification.
The questions to be answered are the following :—
1. Are there any constant differences between the male and the
female ampullee ?
Is there any correlation between the sex of the colonies and
characters of the general structure of the coenosteum ¢
These two questions could be answered without much difficulty
by the examination of a number of preserved specimens of the
same species from the same locality.
In Professor Benham’s notes on the structure of a specimen
which probably corresponds with rrina (Labiopora) nove
zelandic facies “‘ Ramosa,” I find the following remark :—“ Each
ampulla seems to have a small pore (?dactylopore) on its surface.”
In the specimen I have examined of this species I cannot find
these small pores on the ampulle. Von Marenzeller also remarks
that the male ampulle exhibit small dactylopores “in niedrigen
Spitzchen.”
In a previous paper (3) I have shown that, in the ripe male
gonophores of Distichopora and Allopora, the spermatozoa are
discharged by a spout-like seminal duct. In the case of the female
gonophore, however, the only way of escape of the embryo is by the
rupture of the whole surface of the ampulla. It seems possible,
therefore, that the pore on the ampulla mentioned by Professor
Benham may be for the opening of the seminal duct and that the
specimen may be a male. On the other hand, it must not be
assumed that when the surface of a specimen is marked by large
shallow depressions having the size and appearance of ruptured
ampull, the specimen is necessarily a female colony, because in
the specimen of Hrrina (Labiopora) capensis in which these
shallow depressions are very well-marked I found to my surprise
that it was a male colony.
As regards the structure of the gonophores there is very little
to be said at present. The male gonophores of Hrrina (Labiopora)
capensis exhibit a well-developed spadix (manubrium), and in this
respect the genus seems to resemble Distichopora and to differ
from Allopora a. The only other spirit specimen I have received
was a small branch of Hrrina (Labiopora) nove zelandic facies
‘* Benhami,” and this proved to be a female. The specimen was
not, however, in sufticiently good condition to enable me to study
the structure of the gonophore.
Cenenchymal Canals.—From the two spirit specimens I have
ascertained certain isolated facts which may be of some use when
our knowledge of the genus is extended.
HYDROCORALLINE GENUS ERRINA. 893
According to Ridley the conenchymal canals of Z. moseleyi and
L. antarctica ave 0:035 to 0°07 mm. in diameter, the meshes
between the canals are about the same diameter in ZL. moseleyi,
but in LZ, antarctica they vary from the same diameter up to
0-14 mm. Ridley does not state how his measurements were
obtained, consequently the results I have obtained cannot be
compared with his results with any degree of precision.
I have measured the diameter of a number of canals that have
been cut transversely in my sections at a level corresponding
with the base of the dactylozooids, and I find that the average
diameter of these canals is in Hrrina (Labiopora) nove zelandie
0-03 mm. and in Hrrina (L.) capensis 0'05 mm, As the specimens
must have undergone very considerable contraction during de-
calcification and imbedding, I have regarded the measurements of
the meshes as worthless. All that can be said is that in both
species the meshwork of canals is close and elaborate.
In the ‘ Challenger’ monograph Moseley gives as a character
of the genus Hrrina that the number of tentacles on the gastero-
zooids is four. In the Siboga species of Hrrina the number of
tentacles varied from four to five.
In Hrrina (Labiopora) nove zelandiw 1 have found some diffi-
culty in counting the number of tentacles, but judging from a
single series of sections, there are not more than four. In the
specimen of Hrrina (Labiopora) capensis, however, a very large
number of gasterozooids can be clearly seen without decalcification,
and in these the number varies from four to six. From this fact
it is obvious that the number of tentacles on the gasterozooids
cannot be relied upon as a generic or even as a specific character.
List of the Species of the Genus Krrina.
A. Coenosteum hard and compact, perforated by well-defined
ceenosteal pores. Grooved spines turned towards the apex
of the branch.
1. With short grooved spines and only one kind of dactylopore.
The #rring group.
Lrrina labiata Moseley.
Errina ramosa Hickson & England.
Errina horrida Hickson & England.
Errina carinata Pourtales ¢
Errina pourtalesii Dall ¢
*Hrriva glabra (= Lepidopora glabra Pourtales).
*Hrrina cochleata (= Lepidopora cochleata Pourtales).
*Hrrina dabneyi (= Lepidopora dabneyi Pourtales).
2. With long grooved spines and two kinds of dactylopores.
Errina echinata (= Spinipora echinata Moseley).
* See Note, p. 894.
894 PROF. 8. J. HICKSON ON THE
B. Ceenosteum granular and reticulate, without well-defined
coenosteal pores. Grooved spines turned away from the
apex of the branches or clustered and irregularly placed.
The Labiopora group.
Errina aspera Linn.
Errina fissurata Gray.
Errina antarctica (= Labiopora antarctica Gray).
Errina moseleyi (= Labiepora moseleyi Ridley).
Errina nove zelandice Hickson.
Errina capensis Hickson.
Errina gracilis von Marenzeller.
The following species has the grooves turned away from the
apex as in the Labiopora group, but has well defined ccenosteal
pores :—-
Errina macrogastra von Marenzeller (7).
| Additional notes on Professor Hickson’s paper on the
genus Hrrina, received August 14th, 1912.
1. The adjective ‘‘ Hydrocoralline” is used in the title of the
paper at the suggestion of the Secretary of the Society for the
convenience of Zoologists who do not possess a special knowledge
of these Coelenterata. I have in several previous papers declared
my opinion that to unite Millepora with the Stylasterina in one
Order, the Hydrocorallina, is unsound. J have found no reason
to change my mind in that respect. The word “ hydrocoralline ”
may still be used, however, to signify the corals that are Hydrozoa
in very much the same way as the words “corals,” ‘“ zoophytes,”
“worms,” are used, without any strict systematic significance.
2. Since the paper was read I have been able to examine a
number of specimens in the possession of the Muséum d’ Histoire
Naturelle, Paris, for which I am indebted to the kindness of
Prof. Joubin.
In this collection there are some specimens which I have
identified as Hrrina dabneyi Pourt. from the Azores. An
examination of these specimens convinced me that they belong to
the Labiopora group of species, as they exhibit all the charac-
teristic features of that group. From this it seems probable that
the other two species, W. glabra and L. cochleata, that were in-
cluded by Pourtales in the genus Lepidopora should also be
transferred from the Hrrina to the Labiopora group. |
Literature.
(1) J. E. Gray.—(No title.) Proc. Zool. Soc. 1835, p. 85.
(2) J. EH. Gray.—Notes on Corals from the South and Antarctic
Seas. Proc. Zool. Soc. 1872, p. 744.
(3) S. J. Htcxson.—The Gonophores of Allopora and Disticho-
pora. Quart. Journ. Microscop. Sci. vol. xxxu. 1891,
p- 382.
HYDROCURALLINE GENUS ERRINA, 895
(4) 8. J. Hickson & Hrten M. Enciuanp.—The Stylasterina of
the Indian Ocean. ‘Trans. Linn. Soc. xu., 1909.
(5) S. J. Hickson & Henen M. Eneranp.—The Stylasterina of
the Siboga Expedition, 1905.
(6) E. von Marenzevuer.—Madreporaria and Hydrocorallia.
Résultats du Voyage du §.Y. ‘ Belgica.’ 1903.
(7) E. von MarenzeLLer.—Stein- und Hydro-Korallen. Bull.
Mus. Comp. Zool. xliii. 2. 1904.
(8) H. N. Mosetey.—Zoological Collections of H.M.S. * Chal-
lenger,’ vol. 11. 1881, p. 50 seq.
(9) L. F. pp PourtaLes.—Deep Sea Corals. Illustrated Cata-
logue Museum Comp. Zoology, Harvard, 1871.
(10) S. O. Ripteyv.—Zoological Collections of H.M.S. ‘ Alert.’
Proc. Zool. Soc. 1881, p. 105.
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.
Prats XCIV.
Fig. 1. Hrrina (Labiopora) nove zelandie (facies Benhami) ; a portion of a branch
showing the grooved spines arranged in clusters or with the grooves
turned away from the apex. X 45 diam.
Fig. 2. Another photograph of the same facies (Benhami) showing a number of
closely packed anastomosing branches. In this view it will be seen that
although the greater number of the grooves are turned away from the
apex of the branches (the top of the photograph), in places where they are
clustered they are turned in all directions. X 4°75 diam.
Fig. 3. The same species (facies Ramosa). ‘The grooved spines are not so crowded
and rarely form clusters. Nearly all the grooves are turned away from
the apex. > 9'3 diam.
Fig. 4. The same species (facies Dendyi). The grooved spines are still more scattered
and nearly all the grooves are turned away from the apex. in this
photograph several gasteropores can be seen. XX 9°3 diam,
PratE XCV.
Bie. 5. Hrrina (Labiopora) nove zelandie (facies Cooki.) In this facies many of
the spines are in clusters, consequently the grooves appear to be turned
in all directions. > 45 diam.
Fig. 6. Lrrina (Labiopora) aspera. In this specimen the spines are rather
water-worn, but frequently occur in clusters and the grooves point in all
directions. XX 45 diam.
Kig. 7. Hrrina (Labiopora) capensis. The spines are very short and the grooves
all pomt away from the apex. In this photograph the style can be seen
in many of the gasteropores. X 45 diam.
Fig. 8. Hrrina (Spinipora) echinata. In this species, as in the Hrrina group of
species, the grooves are turned towards the apex. X 45 diam.
PratEe XCVI.
Fig. 9. Errina (Labiopora) nove zelandie (facies Ramosa). Slightly enlarged,
showing the profuse ramification without anastomoses, and branches
terminating in delicate points. Drawn by Prot. Benham.
Fig. 10. Hrrina (Labiopora) nove zelandie (facies Cooki). Slightly enlarged,
showing the method of ramification and branches terminating in blunt
points. Drawn by Prof. Benham.
Fig. 11. A terminal branch of the same species (facies Cooki), showing the dactylo-
pores (D) protected by the grooved spines and the gasteropores (G).
<6diam. Drawn by Prof. Benham.
Fig. 12. A portion of a larger branch of the same species (facies Cooki), showing the
grooved spines in clusters. X ca. 6diam. Drawn by Prot. Benham.
896 MR. E. DUKINFIELD JONES ON
Fig. 13. Errina (Labiopora) nove zelandie (facies Benhami). One of the clusters
of four grooved spines as seen from above. X ca. 12 diam.
Figs. 14 & 15. These two drawings are intended to show the difference in texture
between Hrrina (L.) nove zelandie (fig. 14) and Hrrina (L.) capensis
(fig. 15), as seen in vertical section of the ccenosteum. Another point
of difference between the two specimens is that in the former (fig. 14)
the gasteropore penetrates into the depths of the branch and shows a
tabula (¢) in its course; whereas in the latter (fig. 15) the gastero-
pore ends abruptly a little way below the surface. This difference,
however, cannot be regarded as a specific distinction. G, gasteropore ;
D, dactylopore; St., style. Both figures X 35 diam.
54. Descriptions of new Butterflies of the Genus Thecla
from 8.E. Brazil. By E. Duxinrimip Jonss, F.Z.8.,
F.E.S.
[ Received May 18, 1912: Read October 29, 1912. |
(Plate XCVII.*)
INDEX.
Systematic : Pages
Thecla, 13 new species Of ....0.......0eccccseveeeeee 896-902
The species described in the present paper were captured by
myself and the types are in my own collection.
THECLA HAMILA, sp.n. (Pl. XCVII. fig. 1.)
Allied to 7’. gispa Hew.
Male. Upper side rich purplish blue; costa and termen of fore
wings narrowly black, wider at apex: base of costa greenish ;
a lar ge black silky spot with blue reflection beyond cell : cilia
incl Hind wings: costa and termen narrowly black; inner
margin greyish black, rather broad at tornus; tails black with
white tips; a few white scales on inner side of lobe; some
greyish green at tornus above the black margin; submedian hairs
greenish blue; head black; thorax greenish blue; abdomen
purplish blue. Under side dull stone-green suffused with black,
a pale green reflection over all. Fore wings: a medial row of
diffused light stone-green spots from costa to vein 2, the spot
above vein 3 distal; an indistinct subterminal diffused pale green
band; termen black; cilia black with pale green band at apex.
Hind wings darker; a broad diffused black medial shade, very
dark below costa; a narrow dark postmedial shade and broad
subterminal shade; a medial series of green spots between the
veins from inner margin to vein 5, those above veins 2 and 3
distal; termen and cilia black.
Expanse 34 mm.
Hab. Castro, Parana, Brazil.
* For explanation of the Plate see p. 902.
IDS, Se Ie OCG WANE,
Horace Knight del.et lith. West,Newman chr.
NEW SPECIES OF THECLA FROM 5. E. BRAZIL.
NEW BRAZILIAN BUTTERFLIES. 897
THECLA FANCIA, sp.n. (Pl. XOVII. fig. 2.)
Allied to 7’. punctwm H.-S.
Male. Upper side bright metallic blue with a greenish reflection
on basal half of wings; costa of fore wings narrowly, apex and
termen broadly black; a brown circular brand on upper angle of
cell; hind wings outwardly broadly black; tails tipped with
white. Under side yellowish grey: fore wings, a postmedial
band of indistinct brown lunular spots outwardly bordered with
white from costa to vein 2; hind wings: postmedial band inwardly
dark brown, outwardly white, angled on veins | and 2, inwardly
oblique from 3 to 4, placed more distally from 4 to 6 and above 7 ;
a small orange spot at tornus and a larger one between veins 2
and 3.
Expanse 30 mm.
Hab. Castro, Parana, Brazil.
THECLA SICRANA, sp. n. (Pl. XCVII. fig. 3.)
Male. Upper side dull metallic blue; costa and termen of fore
wings narrowly black ; submedian hairs on hind wings greyish ;
tornus dull orange; tails and cilia black tipped with white.
Under side bright green; inner margin of fore wings bluish
grey; hind wings: an indistinct postmedial series of lunular spots
inwardly black, outwardly white; dark red-brown subterminal
spots above veins 1, 2, and 3, the one above 2 larger; tornus dark
red-brown; cilia black tipped with white. Palpi white with
some lateral tawny scales, 3rd joint black; frons brown, with a
few metallic green scales; a white point between antennex;
abdomen bluish grey above, white beneath,
Expanse 30 mm.
Hab. Castro, Parana, Brazil.
THECLA BERTHA, sp. n. (Pl. XCVII. fig. 4.)
Female. Upper side smoky brown, inwardly suffused with
bluish grey ; fore wings irrorated from median nervure to inner
margin with light blue ; cilia smoky brown interrupted by white
between the veins; in the hind wings the irroration covers the
cell also; tornus tawny, with a dark spot on lobe; tails black
with white tip; cilia outwardly whitish. Under side bright
green; basal half of submedian area of fore wings brownish grey,
outer half light grey; a rather broad clear white postmedial
band with indistinct dark central line from costa to vein 2; cilia
reddish brown, tipped with white between the veins. Hind
wings: a nearly straight white medial line defined by maroon on
both sides from vein 8 to vein 1, angled inwards at origin of
veins 3 and 4, broken at vein 2, being placed more distally below
the vein, angled inwardly on submedian fold ; a large white spot
slightly irrorated with maroon above upper angle of cell; three
spots in cell; one spot above vein 2 and one above vein 1;
a terminal series of lunular maroon spots irrorated with white,
fusing at the veins, the one above vein 2 being produced inwardly,
898 MR. E. DUKINFIELD JONES ON
forming a large maroon spot without irroration; cilia reddish
brown, tipped with white between the veins.
Expanse 30 mm.
Hab. Castro, Parana, Brazil.
THECLA SCHAUSA, sp.n. (PI. XOVIT. fig. 5.)
Male. Upper side: fore wings black; cell and submedian area
to near tornus metallic purplish blue; extreme edge of costa
tawny; a small dark grey brand beyond cell; cilia grey; hind
wings metallic purplish blue; costa and apex black; termen
narrowly black; tornus tawny red; cilia grey. Under side:
fore wings brown; a purplish reflection on medial area below
costa; a postmedial wavy dark red line from costa to vein 2;
a terminal band of dark red irrorations wide at apex and tapering
down to vein 2; termen tawny red: bind wings purplish brown ;
an inner and a medial line of red irrorations; outer half of wing
somewhat greyish, very thickly irrorated with red; a diffused red
subterminal band; termen tawny red. Frons tawny red; palpi
white mixed with brown; pectus white.
Female. Very similar to the male; the blue of the wings is
duller; cilia almost white ; termen of hind wings more broadly
black.
Expanse, male 17 mm., female 17 mm.
Hab. Castro, Parana; Sao Paulo, S.E. Brazil.
THECLA JAPOLA, sp.n. (Pl. XCVII. fig. 6.)
Allied to 7. gaina Hew.
Female. Upper side dull steel-blue ; costa, apex, and terminal
area of fore wings broadly greyish black; a dark diffused spot
beyond cell; basal half of extreme costa tawny ; cilia outwardly
brown. Hind wings: costal and terminal areas greyish black,
lighter than fore wings; an indistinct subterminal row of dark
lunular spots, conspicuous above veins | and 2; a red spot on
lobe ; tails black, tipped with white; termen black, preceded by
whitish line; cilia black at base, white at centre, brown at tips.
Under side brownish grey; fore wings: an inwardly diffused
reddish-brown postmedial band, outwardly white, straight from
costa to vein 2; terminal area pale grey with two diffused brown
bands, the inner broad, the outer narrow ; termen dark brown ;
cilia light brown ; hind wings: an inwardly reddish-brown, out-
wardly white medial band straight from costa to vein 2, angled
on veins 1 and 2 forming a very acute W; terminal area whitish
grey with an inner brown band, broad and diffused at costa,
narrow and distinct at tornus, bent strongly towards base on
inner margin, followed at tornus by orange-red to a black spot on
lobe, some white at base of lobe ; an orange-red lunular spot with
black point above vein 2; termen dark brown; cilia lighter with
pale band.
Kixpanse 28 mm.
Hab. Castro, Parana, Brazil.
NEW BRAZILIAN BUTTERFLIES. 899
THECLA FERNANDA, sp.n. (PI. XOVII. fig. 7.)
Allied to 7. nubitlum H. H. Druce.
Male. Upper side dark blackish brown ; a red spot on lobe and
a few white scales at tornus; tails black tipped with white.
Under side yellowish grey-brown ; fore wings: a dark postmedial
band outwardly bordered with white, nearly straight from costa
to vein 2; hind wings: postmedial band inwardly shaded with
red and outwardly with white, angled on veins | and 2, proximate
between veins 3 and 4, straight from 4 to 7, distal above 7
forming conspicuous spot at costa. Differs from 7. mubilwm in
the band on fore wing being straighter, that on the hind wing
less acutely angled on veins | and 2 and in the distal spot at costa,
also in absence of discocellular bar.
Expanse 29 mm.
Hab. Fernandes Pinheiro, Parana, Brazil.
THECLA NoRA, sp.n. (Pl. XCVII. fig. 8.)
Male. Upper side dark metallic lilacine blue; costa and termen
of fore wings narrowly black, broader at apex; a large black
brand beyond celi; cilia black at base, whitish metallic blue at
tips; hind wings: costal area greyish brown; a fine black
terminal line; cilia black with bluish-white band. Under side
brownish grey : fore wings suffused with steel-blue on submedian
area; postmedial band inwardly dark brown, outwardly white
from costa to vein 3, below vein 3 the brown changes to blue ;
a very indistinct subterminal line, inwardly white, outwardly
brown; cilia brown; hind wings: postmedial band dark brown,
shaded inwardly with orange and outwardly with white, strongly
angled on veins 1 and 2, outwardly displaced between 4 and 5;
a series of subterminal lunular spots shaded inwardly with white,
followed by orange spot at tornus, a dark spot irrorated with
white below vein 2 and an orange spot containing black point
below 3; a narrow white terminal line; cilia dark brown with
bluish-white tips.
Expanse 24 mm.
Hab. Castro, Parana, Brazil.
THECLA MOLENA, sp.n. (PI. XCVII. fig. 9.)
Closely allied to 7’. lemona Hew.
Male. Upper side dull dark metallic blue; fore wings: outer
half of costa, apex and termen black; a large oval black brand,
crossed by blue discocellular bar; extreme costa tawny at base;
hind wings: termen narrowly black; tails black tipped with
white; a red spot on lobe. Under side brown with a lilacine
reflection on terminal area of fore wings and the whole of the
hind wings. The bands and lines are much the same as in
7. lemona, but they are much more diffused and subdued; this
difference and the lilacine reflection readily distinguish the
species. 7’. lemona is also a larger insect than the present.
900 MR. FE. DUKINFIELD JONES ON
Female. Upper side brown, suffused with lilacine on basal area.
Under side as in male, but the lilacine reflection is much less
pronounced,
Expanse, male 24 mm., female 24 mm,
Hab, Castro, Parana, Brazil.
THECLA ESMERALDA, sp. n. (PI. XCVII. figs. 10, 11.)
Close to 7. janias Cr., but differs in the very much wider
black margins of the upper side and in the postmedial line, and
in the orange spot in place of the black spot on the under side in
janias.
Male. Palpi and head vivid metallic green; legs green; tarsi
inwardly whitish and banded with black; thorax, abdomen, ‘and
wings vich purplish blue. Fore wings broadly bordered with
black on costa and termen, very broad at apex; a small circular
dark grey brand. Hind wings broadly black on costal and apical
areas, narrowly from vein 4 to tornus; a green spot on the black
at tornus; tails black tipped with white. Under side: fore
wings vivid metallic green, inner margin grey; cilia brown:
hind wings vivid metallic green; a fine black wavy postmedial
line, most distinct at inner margin; some lunular subterminal
spots near tornus, that above vein 2 being bright orange; some
white scales at tornus. )
Female. Thorax green; wings and abdomen brown, with slight
lilacine grey tint on hind wings and basal half of fore wings.
Under side as in male, but the postmedial line clearer and the
orange spot above vein 2 much larger, there 1s also some orange
at tornus; cilia inwardly black, outwardly whitish.
Expanse, male 27 mm., female 25 mm.
Hab. Castro, Parana, Brazil.
THECLA CASTRENA, sp.n. (Pl. XCVIT. figs. 12, 13.)
Allied to 7. phrosine H. H. Druce.
Male. Upper side dark blackish brown ; a few lilacine scales
at base and along inner margin of fore wings; a slight lilacine
reflection on hind wings; termen dark and cilia white in both
wings. Under side: fore wings pale lilacine blue; apex and
inner margin whitish; a lilacine reflection over the whole ;
a medial V-shaped mark on submedian fold; a slightly wavy
red-brown postmedial band from costa to vein 2, followed by
white spot above vein 6; a fine black terminal line, becoming
brown at apex ; cilia white at tornus, shading to brownish at apex.
Hind wings white with lilacine reflection ; a bright orange-tawny
irregular postmedial band of elongated spots, placed distally helow
veins 1, 3, 5, 6 and 8, and proximally below 2, 4 and 7; a sub-
terminal row of minute tawny and black spots between the
veins; a fine black terminal iine, shading to brown at tornus ;
cilia white.
Female. Upper side the same as the male, except that the cilia
NEW BRAZILIAN BUTTERFLIES. 901
are brown. Under side yellowish grey, the hind wings lighter
than fore wings; bands as in male, but the postmedial is out-
wardly shaded with white and there is a subterminal series of red
spots from vein 2 to 6; termen brown ; cilia brown: on the hind
wing the subterminal spots are much larger than in the male,
termen brown, inwardly shaded with white, cilia greyish
white.
Expanse, male 25 mm., female 24 mm.
Hab. Castro, Parana, Brazil.
THECLA CAMPA, sp.n. (PI. XCVII. fig. 14.)
Near 7’. biblia Hew.
Male. Upper side dull blackish blue, shading to black on outer
half of fore wings; cilia brown ; hind wings; termen narrowly
black ; fringe of abdominal fold white; cilia black, with white
band at tornus, outwardly brown at apex. Under side light
green with a light lilacine-blue reflection; cilia of fore wings
light brown ; hind wings: an obscure greyish-white discocellular
bar; an obscure sinuous greyish-white postmedial line, more
clearly defined from inner margin to vein 3; a black spot at
tornus with some white scales above and below it; a minute
black point below vein 2 and a small orange-red spot ringed with
black below vem 3; termen near tornus bluish white. Palpi
white with green reflection, third joint black above, white
beneath ; frons metallic green; back of head and tegule dark
brown ; eyes surrounded with white; body blue-black above,
creamy white beneath.
Expanse 22 mm.
Hab. Castro, Parana, Brazil.
THECLA DATITIA, sp.n. (Pl. XCVII. fig. 15.)
Very near 7. tadita Hewitson, but differing from it in the
possession of tails, the narrow black margins on upper side of
the hind wings, and in the terminal rows of lunular.spots and the
black spots on the under side of the hind wings.
Male. Upper side: fore wings smoky black; a very dark
medial suffusion from costa to vein 2; outer two-thirds of cell
filled with raised brown scales; a submedian patch of lilacine
blue from base to near tornus; termen dark; cilia greyish ;
hind wings lilacine blue, broadly black on costa and apex;
a series of diffused black subterminal spots, confluent below apex ;
termen dark ; cilia greyish ; tails dark with white tips. Under
side grey with light brown bands. Fore wings: a light brown
discocellular bar; a well-defined light brown postmedial band,
diffused on inner side; a narrower and wavy subterminal band
followed by a row of diffused spots; termen light brown; cilia
grey at base, brown at tips. Hind wings: base light brown
irrorated with grey; a light brown discocellular bar; a dark
narrow postmedial band, diffused on inner side and followed by
Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1912, No, LX. 60
902 MR. R. LYDEKKER ON
narrow grey line and broad light brown suffusion ; a medial spot
ringed with grey at costa; a terminal series of diffused lunular
spots, containing a black spot above vein 2.
Expanse 23 mm.
Hab. Fernandes Pinheiro, Parana, Brazil.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XCVII.
Big. 1. Thecla hamila 3. Fig. 9. Thecla molena @.
2. » jfancia 6. 10. » esmeralda 3.
3. » sierana g. 11. iF 6 :
A. » bertha 2. 12. >» castrena 6.
5. » schausa 6. 13. a Bs 5
6. » japola 9. 14. » canpa o.
ie » fernanda ¢. 15. > © datitia So:
8. » nora 6.
55. The Bornean Bantin.
By R. Lypexxer, F.R.S., F.Z.S.*
[ Received October 1, 1912: Read October 29, 1912. ]
(Text-figures 123-125.)
That the Bantin of Borneo should be subspecifically distinct
from the typical Bos sondaicus of Java is what might naturally
be expected, and the only wonder is that its distinction has
not long since been recognized and a name assigned to the
local race. This, however, is not improbably due to the fact
that, so far at least as this country is concerned, the Javan
Bantin is an exceedingly rare animal in museums, the only com-
plete adult example in the British Museum (Nat. Hist.) being
the mounted skin of a bull obtained by exchange with the Leiden
Museum in 1846, and now, as might have been expected after
long and unprotected exposure in the galleries at Bloomsbury, in
an exceedingly dilapidated condition. The Museum also possesses
a fine mounted head of a bull, presented in 1904 by Baron L. T.
H. van Heckeren-tot-Walien; and also the skeletons of a bull
and cow, with the horns, obtained from Leiden at the same time
as the mounted skin, the skull of the former being exhibited in.
the Pavilion at the further end of the Lower Mammal Gallery.
In addition to these is the mounted skin of an immature male,
and also a young skull, with horns—from the Lidth de Jeude
collection—both of which present all the characteristics of the
Javan race.
On the other hand, the Museum has a considerable series
of skulls and horns of the Bornean Bantin presented by Mr.
H. B. Low in 1880 and 1887, as well as two presented by
Mr. W. B. Pryer in 1886, all these being from North Borneo.
Sir Edmund Loder also possesses at least two frontlets and
* By permission of the Trustees of the British Museum.
THE BORNEAN BANTIN. 903
horns of subadult Bornean Bantins in his private museum at
Leonardslee.
As regards the colour of the Bornean Bantin I know nothing
definite ; but, in the absence of any statement to the contrary,
I presume it is approximately similar to that of the typical
Javan race; that is to say, adult bulls are blackish brown or
black with a large white rump-patch and white ‘“ stockings,” while
the cows and young bulls have the dark area rufous or chestnut.
In all the above-mentioned Javan specimens in the Museum
the horns are of the type of those shown in text-fig. 123, which
Text-fig. 123.
Skull and horns of male Javan Bantin (Bos sondaicus) in the
British Museum.
represents the skull of a bull obtained from Leiden in 1846. At
their origin the horns are directed mainly outwards, but at rather
more than half their length they curve suddenly inwards with
a somewhat forward and finally a backward inclination. This
60*
904 MR, R. LYDEKKER ON
causes them to have a relatively large maximum span and a cor-
respondingly small tip-to-tip interval, as is indicated in the table
of measurements given below. In consequence, I take it, of the
outward and somewhat backward direction of the basal portion
of the horns, the frontal region of the skull is somewhat convex,
while the intercornual ridge has a distinct prominence in the
middle line.
Text-fig. 124.
Skull and horns of male Bornean Bantin (B. sondaicus lowi), from the
Rejang Valley, in the British Museum.
In the Bornean Bantin, as typified by the largest of the skulls
presented by Mr. Low to the British Museum (text-fig. 124), the
horns, which are relatively stouter, are less curved and have a
THE BORNEAN BANTIN. 905
more upright direction, arising at an angle of about 45° from the
ends of the frontal ridge of the skull, and finally curving inwards
to a less extent than those of the typical race, the terminal
portion thus being shorter and the maximum span less. Similar
characters are shown in the two frontlets with horns in the
. Text-fig. 125.
B
A & B.—Frontlets and horns of two Bornean Rantins (B. sondaicus lowit)
in the collection of Sir E. G. Loder.
collection of Sir E. G. Loder, represented in text-fig. 125, these
also exhibiting the relatively smaii size of the horns which
appears to characterise many Bornean Bantin heads. The skull
of the Bornean Bantin is characterised by the flatness of the
forehead and the straight intercornual ridge.
906 MR. E. G. BOULENGER ON THE
The dimensions, in inches, of the specimens represented in
text-figs. 123 & 124 are as follows :—
B. sondaicus. B. s. lowi.
Length of horn on outer curve......... 25 214
Basalvorrthvot ditto, asst s.ssee tees 11} 123
Maximum span of horns ............... 28 2335
Tip-to-tip interval of ditto ............ 16 13
Length from intercornual ridge of
skull to tip of nasals .......... een 16 133
Minimum width of skull between base
of hownecorelamdioroitn sas eeeet ee a i
These differences fully justify the right of the Bornean Bantin
to racial distinction, and as none of the comparatively few
synonyms of Bos sondaicus appears referable to that race, I
propose that it should be known as B. sondaicus lowi; the skull
and horns represented in text-fig. 124 (B. M. No. 87.2.10.4)
being the type.
It may be added that both the Burmese Bantin or Tsaine, for
which I proposed the name of B. s. birmanicus in the Society’s
‘Proceedings’ for 1898, p. 277, and the Siamese Bantin, for
which I have suggested the name of B.s. porteri, Ibid. 1909,
p. 669, have horns of the general type of those of the typical
race, although those of the Siamese race are more heavily wrinkled
at the base than any Javan horns in the British Museum.
Information is still required as to whether the Bantin occurs
in Sumatra.
56. Notes on the Breeding of the “ Millions” Fish (Grar-
dinus peciloides). By Epwarp G. BouLunesr, F.Z.S..,
Curator of Reptiles.
[Received October 18, 1912: Read October 29, 1912. ]
The little fish Girardinus peciloides, popularly known as
‘‘Millions” in Barbados on account of the enormous numbers
frequenting all the shallow pools in that island, is said to be
of great practical value on account of its devouring mosquitoes ;
the absence of malaria, which is so prevalent in the neighbouring
islands, is believed to be due, as first pointed out by Mr. C.
Kenrick Gibbons, to the presence of this fish, for the insect con-
veying the malarial disease breeds only in shallow pools, where
these fish abound and, it is well to add, have no competitors,
G. peciloides being the only freshwater fish inhabiting Barbados.
For this reason, the Society arranged with the Colonial Office to
keep a large stock and to supply specimens to various tropical
stations in the British Empire. The fishes have bred on numerous
occasions in small aquariums in the Reptile and Tortoise Houses,
BREEDING OF GIRARDINUS PCSCILOIDES. 907
and I have thus been able to observe certain facts in relation
to their breeding habits, to one of which in particular I wish to
draw attention, namely that in some cases the male breeds before
the assumption of its secondary sexual characters. Before dealing
with this matter it is necessary to mention briefly the sexual differ-
ences, which are very marked. Females, which may measure up
to 25 mm. in length, are simply of a dull olive-grey in colour,
usually with a dark patch above the anal fin, while the males,
which do not attain quite so large a size, are most conspicuously
ornamented with red, blue, violet and yellow, with a dark ocellar
spot situated in the middle of the body, in front of or beneath
the dorsal fin, and another at the base of the caudal fin, these
spots appearing at least fourteen days before the brilliané hues.
Males are to be further distinguished from females by the
position and prolongation of their anal fin, which is transformed
into an intromittent pairing organ.
The male is remarkably active, and is perpetually courting the
female, going through all kinds of antics in front of her, and as
breeding goes on al through the year, at least in captivity, the
latter is in an almost permanently pregnant condition, and within
a fortnight of having brought forth a brood (such a period
representing the duration of the gestation, at a temperature
of over 70°), once more brings a generation into the world.
It should be borne in mind, however, that a single impregnation
is sufficient for the fertilization of several broods, the embryos of
the second and third generations being already in an advanced
condition when the first young are born. Each brood comprises
from five to as many as twenty-five fish.
The young fishes grow rapidly : about 4 mm. long at birth, they
double that length in a fortnight or so, when their sex can be
determined by the shape and position of the anal fin; it is not,
however, until at least six weeks after birth that the males
become adorned with the brilliant colours which characterise the
adult, this period again varying according to the temperature of
the water.
The first brood, containing a male which bred before the
assumption of its secondary sexual characters, was produced on
March 11th of this year, and numbered eleven. As is almost
invariably the case, a number of weaklings died within a few days
of their birth, and eight fish remained at the end of a fortnight,
when I found the sexes to be equally divided, which is remark-
able, for as a rule females outnumber males by about three to one.
On May 7th, six young ones were born of this brood, and at the
time none of the males had developed their adult coloration, the
only markings distinguishing them from the females being the
spots beneath the dorsal fin and at the base of the caudal, and it
was in fact not until six days later that one of these acquired its
full sexual livery. The others followed suit on May 17th and
18th. These broods were kept at an average temperature of 80°.
In another case, a brood of fourteen fishes, born on June 5th,
908 THE SECRETARY ON ADDITIONS TO THE MENAGERIE.
and of which only seven survived, two males and five females,
reproduced their species on September 29th and 30th, the adult
coloration of the males appearing only on October 7th and 16th.
When we consider the fact that these fishes, owing to the warmer
tanks being already occupied, were kept at the low average
temperature of 65°, we must conclude that, like their growth, the
period of gestation must have been slow, and that the male
undoubtedly bred at least a month before acquiring its full
secondary sexual characters.
A parallel case is well known in the male Salmon, which
occasionally becomes sexually mature in the parr condition,
while the Wrass (Corts julis) and the Dragonet (Callionymus
lyra) have been observed by Mr. H. W. Holt also to become
sexually mature prior to having fully developed their adult
characters. In the two latter cases, however, the question is
one of degree only, the characteristic male livery not being
entirely absent, as in Girardinus.
EXHIBITIONS AND NOTICES.
October 29, 1912.
Prof, E. A. Miycuin, M.A., F.R.S., Vice-President,
in the Chair.
The Srcrerary read the following report on the Additions that
had been made to the Society’s Menagerie during the months of
May, June, July, August, and September 1912.
May.
The registered additions to the Society’s Menagerie during the
month of May were 448 in number. Of these, 207 were acquired
by presentation, 60 by purchase, 43 were received on deposit,
72 in exchange, and 66 were born in the Gardens.
The number of departures during the same period, by death
and removals, was 203.
Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :—
A large collection of Mammals and Birds from Nepal, including
1 Indian Rhinoceros (2hinoceros unicornis), 1 Kiang (Zquus
kiang), 2 Barasingha Deer (Cervus duvaucelli), 2 Sambur Deer
(Cervus aristotelis), 3 Hog-Deer (Cervus porcinus), 2 Monaul
Pheasants (Lophophorus impeyanus), 2 Cheer Pheasants (Catreus
wallichi), and 2 Wedge-tailed Fruit-Pigeons (Sphenocercus sphe-
nurus); presented on May 21st by H.M. Tue Kine.
A pair of European Bison (Dison bonasus), from Russia, pre
santed by H.G. the Duke of Bedford, K.G., on May 15th.
———
THE SECRETARY ON ADDITIONS TO THE MENAGERIE. 909
1 Black Leopard (felis pardus), from Assam, purchased on
May 21st.
1 Branded Palm-Civet (Arctogalidia stigmatica), from Sarawak,
new to the Collection, presented by Granville J. Altman, Hsq.,
F.Z.S., on May 16th.
1 Civet (Viverra civetia), from EK. Africa, and 2 Egyptian
Mongooses (Mungos ichnewmon), from Zagazig, presented by
H.E. Hassan Hasib Pasha on May 21st.
1 Ural Owl (Syrniwm uralense), from Northern Europe, pre-
sented by E. G. B. Meade-Waldo, Esq., V.P.Z.S., on May 8th.
A collection of rare Reptiles from India, received in exchange
on May 21st, containing, amongst others, 2 Banded Kachugas
(Kachuga dhongoka) and 3 Variegated Snakes (Zamenis fascio-
latus), new to the Collection, and 2 Gharials (Gavialis gangeticus).
JUNE.
The registered additions to the Society’s Menagerie during the
month of June were 511 in number. Of these 305 were acquired
by presentation, 66 by purchase, 50 were received on deposit,
13 in exchange, and 77 were born in the Gardens.
The number of departures during the same period, by death
and removals, was 205.
Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :—
A collection of Malayan Animals presented by the Government
of the Federated Malay States and other Donors on June 24th,
including 1 Indian Elephant (Hlephas indicus), 1 Tiger (Melis
tigris), 1 Clouded Tiger (felis nebulosus), 1 Binturong (Arctictis
binturong), 2 Argus Pheasants (Argusianus argus), 4 Rufous-tailed
Fireback Pheasants (Aconws erythrophthalmus), and 1 Malayan
Peacock-Pheasant (Polyplectron bicalcaratum), besides the
following, which were all new to the Collection, viz. :—1 Short-
tailed Mongoose (Jungos brachyurus), 10 Charlton’s Tree-
Partridges (drboricola charltoni), 1 Water-Cock (G@allicrea
cinerea), 2 Water-Snakes (Acrochordus javanicus), 1 Bowring’s
Gecko (Hemidactylus bowringii), 1 Bridled Gecko (/Hemidactylus
Jrenatus), and 1 Leschenault’s Gecko (Hemidactylus leschenaultii).
2 Malayan Tapirs (Vapirus indicus) 5 2, from Palenibang,
Sumatra, received in exchange on June 22nd.
1 Grys-bok (Nototragus melanotis) 3, from Cape Colony, pre-
sented by Dr. Louis Péringuey, C.M.Z.8., on June 3rd.
1 Shoebill (Baleniceps rex), from the Sudan, presented by
Lt.-Gen. Sir Francis Wingate, G.C.V.O., on June 29th.
2 Ocellated Turkeys (Meleagris ocellata), from Central America,
deposited on June 24th.
2 Chestnut-bellied Rock-Thrushes (Petrophila erythrogastra),
from the Himalayas, new to the Collection, received in exchange
on June 17th.
2 Brown-backed Robins (Thamnobia cambaiensis), from India,
new to the Collection, purchased on June 18th.
910 THE SECRETARY ON ADDITIONS TO THE MENAGERIE.
1 Temminck’s Robin (Hrithacus komadori), from Japan, new to
the Collection, presented by Wilfrid Frost, Esq., on June 14th.
2 Grey Thrashers (Z'oxostoma cinerewm), from Lower California,
new to the Collection, presented by H. D. Astley, Esq., on
June 15th.
6 Chilian Siskins (Chrysomitris uropygialis), new to the Col-
lection, presented by Arthur C. Macdonald, Esq., on June 26th.
2 Himalayan White-throated Ground-Thrushes (Geocichla cya-
nonotus), bred in the Menagerie.
12 Russell’s Vipers (Vipera russelli), born in the Menagerie.
JULY.
The registered additions to the Society’s Menagerie during the
month of July were 289 in number. Of these 155 were acquired
by presentation, 13 by purchase, 57 were received on deposit,
25 in exchange, and 39 were born in the Gardens.
The number of departures during the same period, by death
and removals, was 301.
Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :—
] African Buffalo (Bubalus caffer) 3, from the Ishasha River,
Uganda, presented by Capt. E. H. Reid on July 29th.
1 Vaal Rhe-bok (Pelea capreolus) 3, from Basutoland, pre-
sented by M. H. Bosworth Smith, Esq., on July 6th.
2 Yellow-headed Wagtails (Motacilla citreola) and 1 Brown
Shrike (Lanius cristatws), from India, new to the Collection,
presented by W. J. C. Frost, Esq., on July 25th.
1 Changeable Hawk-Hagle (Spizaétus limnaétus), from India,
new to the Collection, deposited on July 25th.
1 Hemprich’s Gull (Larus hemprichi), hatched in the Menagerie
on July 22nd.
1 Black-and- White Cobra (Vata melanoleuca), from Dunkwa, Gold
Coast, presented by Dr. H. G. F. Spurrell, F.Z.8., on July 16th.
1 Snake-Fish (Polypterus senegalus), from the Upper Nile,
presented by the Rev. Archibald Shaw on July 9th.
AUGUST.
The registered additions to the Society’s Menagerie during
the month of August were 226 in number. Of these 74 were
acquired by presentation, 40 by purchase, 55 were received on
deposit, 9 in exchange, and 48 were born in the Gardens.
The number of departures during the same period, by death
and removals, was 285.
Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :—
1 White-thighed Guereza (Colobus vellerosus), from West
Africa, presented by Miss Jean Aylwin on August 30th.
1 Roebuck fawn (Capreolus capreolus), from Ross-shire, pre-
sented by the Karl of Altamont, F.Z.S., on August Ist.
1 Mount Morrison Laughing-Thrush (Zvrochalopterum morri-
somanum), from Formosa, new to the Collection, deposited on
August 5th.
MR. R. LYDEKKER ON GAZELLA HAYI. 911
1 Magpie-Tanager (Cissopis leveriana), 3 Australian Crimson
Finches (% coohmia phaéton), 2 Peale’s Parrot-Finches (Lrythrura
pealet), and 6 Douglas Quails (Lophortyx douglasi), all bred for
the first time in the Menagerie.
1 Matamata Terrapin (Chel ys fimbriata), from Brazil, presented
by Oswald Allen, Esq., on August 10th.
12 Six-banded Cyprinodons (Haplochilus sexfasciatus), from
rast Africa, new to the Collection, presented by Dr. H. G. F.
Spurrell, EAS, on August 21st.
SEPTEMBER.
The registered additions to the Society's Menagerie during
the month of September were 227 in number. Of these 59 were
acquired by presentation, 18 by purchase, 20 were received on
deposit, 24 in exchange, and 106 were born in the Gardens.
The number of departures during the same period, by death
and removals, was 247.
Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :—
4 Pelzeln’s Gazelles (Gazella pelzelni), presented by Dr. R. KK.
Drake-Brockman, F.Z.S., on September 26th.
1 Pelzeln’s Gazelle (Gazella pelzelni), presented by A. Gibbs,
EKsq., on September 26th.
1 Capybara (Hydrocherus hydrocherus), presented by Sir Walter
Egerton, K.C.M.G., F.Z.8., and J. J. Nunan, Esq., on September
2nd.
1 White-tailed Gnu (Connechetes gnu), presented by the
Government of South Africa on September 28th.
1 Kordofan Girafte (Giraffa camelopardalis antiquorum) 6,
presented by Lt.-Gen. Sir Francis Reginald Wingate, G.C.V.O.,
K.C.M.G., C.B., D.S.O., on September 13th.
1 Brown Tyrant (/yiarchus tyrannulus), from Uruguay, new
to the Collection, presented by Mrs. EH. F. Dickinson on
September 3rd.
1 Great Indian Bustard (Hupodotis edwardsi), new to the
Collection, presented by Sir John Hewitt, K.C.S.I., on September
30th.
2 European Bee-eaters (Werops apiaster), received in exchange
on September 11th.
2 Snake-headed Fishes (Ophiocephalus punctatus), from India,
new to the Collection, received in exchange on September 7th.
‘* GAZELLA HAYI” = GAZELLA FUSCIFRONS.
Mr. R. Lypexxer, F.R.S., F.Z.8.*, contributed the following
note :-—
‘“‘ As the result of an unfortunate accident, namely the trans-
position of the registration labels of two gazelles received
simultaneously at the British Museum, I find that I have
described and figured a specimen of the Seistan Gazella fuscifrons
* By permission of the Trustees of the British Museum.
919 MRS, R. HAIG THOMAS ON THE
as a new African species under the name G. hayi (Proc. Zool.
Soc. 1911, p. 961, text-fig. 193A). My apologies are due both
to the Society and to naturalists in general for this most unfor-
tunate mistake. :
The text-figure of the so-called G. hayi will serve as an
illustration of the male of G. fuscifrons. The gazelle collected
by Mr. Hay in Algeria is, I believe, G. isabella.”
The Rev. T. R. R. Stepsine, M.A., F.R.S., F.Z.S., communi-
cated a memoir on the Crustacea Isopoda collected by the
‘Porcupine’ Expedition in 1869-1870, in which he described
one new family, two new genera, and four new species.
This memoir will be published in the ‘ Transactions’ in due
course.
Mrs. Rosz Haic Tuomas, F.Z.8., exhibited the eggs of Phasi-
anus formosanus, P. versicolor, and their F.1 and F. 2 offspring,
and made the following remarks :—
“ Last February I exhibited to the Society a series of Pheasant
skins of an experimental cross between a Formosan female and a
versicolor male, illustrating the transmission by the male parent
to his female offspring of most of the female characters of his
Text-fig. 126.
Eggs ot P. versicolor, F.1, Fo.X Ve., F.2, Fo.X Ve.X Ve., and P. formosanus.
race: further evidence of this is now exhibited, namely, the eggs
of the two parent species and those of their F.1 and F. 2 offspring.
It is plain that a considerable difference in dimensions exists
between the eggs of P. formosanus, the larger, and P. versicolor
the smaller of the two: the expectation was that the eggs of the
offspring would resemble in size the egg of the female parent
species rather than that of the male parent species ; but, on com-
paring them, it is clear that the eggs of F.1 and F. 2 are simply
EGGS OF PHEASANTS. 913
P. versicolor. A photograph (text-fig. 126) by Mrs. Peter Haig
Thomas of the four eggs shows very accurately the comparative
Sizes.
The measurements of these eggs are as follows :—
Girth of length. Girth of breadth.
P. formosanus ......... 5; ins. 412 ins.
JE GORSUGNOP o4..204008. 4 Ale ,, 44 ,,
Fl Bo aVies eee. Ale ,, 45. ,,
Ha Hos GiViey |