~ eee 8 rt, eee ea GrOnll Sate ~ —- 2. e* © + eave es —— i i te et ee Sm atin Hin de ~ We tee ee 6 etd © Be ne ee Om le oe ke a ee ee) eee et Oe eel OTD te tty Bary egw Mes pe ny ae ir A A Aa ide Ae ip A Nhe te ay ey Male AB A eral ty he, hh ee tt A le I RL OR Oe A Eh OW POE ESO —- RA A ABA ted e-em aes « ad OO Re ETS Oe OOO AADEM O_O A Rem St oe A le ne AAR A A he Sle he ety ot hb kh ek et I MAN ade th Om Rh TR: ie Cie belt ae tien A ea lt nk eth instil Le tl SRR ee ee ek ae OR- OHH E-+ OBOE 444444 OG8,8 Ol ee Oe ee ee eee er er ee ee re ee ee ow ae) See he Rg ot ha Rite Rea ty Ina lle He late Fee tal EA ihe he Dinah adn gt Taine hare el A FL te ow OP FON OER NM SE ASO A A ORE DOO HAO ee BOR OD FL OO 2A ed Reh a ad OO RO abe 8 ee Oe) Ot eR Re ee 0+ AS. O84 OOOO 6 i Bo Bam 0 fete A Thm ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee Se ee es ee eas a il Am ne te tn i Nl ni, ly At a ee ee CN ee ee ee ee re eee eee ee eee See ee ee ee ee eae ee ee ere ~omne Oe Ree eR a FO FO OD Bee REET Be EO © Ot WHE 8. OP OO HOE & SO OA. Oh Se 0.48642 LDER O60 Oe ON 1 OOO OO, * - ee ee ee —- +e ee en ee ee ee ee ee ee re ae eee es ee ene Se we ee a ee eS ee PSSM OAH S- OS oH OM i a nO Dandy OP Btn te em ee ee ee en ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee oe eo ee ee a oe ee A ee re en ee Reel thet dling Me te tet team re See eS ee ee ~~ “ . a etn anitintenia tines a ae ee ear wwe er re nee ee ee ee ee ee NN EE ee ~~ e -ee ~~* e480 ao de ee ee eS ee ee ee ee ee ee eee eS ee eee eee eee i. ” ne ne eh hott BP srw hah a Retin Pepe i= Be anther tm reo nt ihe Bethel Mok =~ were oP i oe ee ee ee Re ye i tl A Ee hth Me te tl i A ta ti a tlh ly il i cit Ae Nn Nh A Nie PP Bt te Mat het tei AR GR he See Nn om Satna ior the tae Gita a) r~ Mrsonlh hn he Renan tensa Saraitediasin diet tietatee ho nee tee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee A AN lh Mile le Men alt Cimon alba lly. Pantin te Dn dn ef mh i BE Bh teeter 9 2 i themed pein oe Sem ee Bi r= Yow me > tots © rh _e-e* @ee > Ne ee ee ee ee ee —" aa LAD SF Ree the OS-2 1 es oe A hhh a Ce eget BL tthe tin + Ba ihn tt Oh ee nk, eatin BeBe? th: Nei Te Bite itt Pe A mG aa ee Ot ee eee ee ee Oe ee ee eee ae ee ee Se ee ee eee ee ees ae. ees Ce a Se i Oo eee an tnt of Met Paneer co oe eo itetiA toh te Oh Oem 8 a © ee a See . a Mn Ty Ae hee el ee et Sele lene um hl ee te ete PD eieliedin endl efipalted © I theo. hey Sim lnntl aah fed ae A ge le in i i am i il a ate A le Mae om st tly Oo ADO OB Ol Kt BOAO ate Re tel ee ee eS eee 6 my + elo’ alt —_— he . ~e? oe * . a tht Reet errs ete ° ahi gy trae etn alee i ila th _ oe “ om ty dinety~Reathye 700 tte Ral ing he tg a he Ome Aw pe Poh ew tee me Dre towed Oe (FOO Bd Othe d- & Oe EO OO Oso © 4. a Se OD OO 7 ee ee eee ee ee a ee ee ee ee ee ee Dd BAR Ahn td ME. et Hmm NA be tei OM: De te Mell an? og A nha sR . - thn Sertalenasthadtameiehiahat TT ee a oh alee SOON 4 ree $ POA wee Ph RPBO & o * te > ta ~ > he sat bem a Ce ee ee oe ee Ts athe lane aint i ae i eile tl eh hh > se kp ttt Aue ty let dtl ayer ms ee’) te be rieiniaaarirnananees ee. - SS ar P< eet " Sone aan i “wn =~: ~~ oni te alta Sita Wnt nr = tne nth ot ant Gente ihe Ds fae Liane A> <> eet ene OO OOOH aS A il lll ‘ TE ee ee ee 2 ee ee eee Or et ee ee othe. tall et ® Oi DBA BBO “th . Wt Fn aha haltnae? ~ ett Pwtetoaers ete ee ee ee = fe i al: A ie Sn pe te 2 ih ele « ee ed font Pmt cBe Bs nt Nom OP A Mw a re

2 ee ee i el lp Atte My all ity ee ae eres eer ee ee Sn se eee ee on J ee te Olt One ta . . “—~ we - —e- Se ee be my ae ih » ° ee ee Aah oe tenth a a e. 7 he ee ee ee ee ee 0-0-8 ~ tafrmm Benet rs tne . a ee er ee ee ee ernie Sarwar a ee Oe Se Ser ee pe he athe > Metl F Be Rake Sheth alla Grae han ae tte Gi en — RN 8 Rl Oe Re Oy te elt ® ih oo Ey & ee ee eee we ee ee eee errs ae 2 a ete et Fe A A Neate Me ee A Oe let Ph He Pf errind & y. e : ° Oe Aye te ete : Sette, ene . Ae ete el ee A Ia wre eee eee ee » eee eee ee ee ee el a afin —~ -_ oo 2e we - -2e4- eae , hee ar hee ee © - eS eae ll tail im a ee 2 ee. — ee ee ee Se veer _ ew Se rrr wr a hn > a.0_A >. ita ae ey eee ee ee eS A Cn Meta wn iB 4. 8 “ e en a on ~ r ae Tw Very ered ~~ eee e rw . es Redhill a I la ad? sees wr - Snore ~—e io iid ah P- PO-o F a= abe o- eee ee ies eT a et a i SO kaa = - as - - ~s een . one we ae hee 68 RO ee ro or ee ee ee ee ee ee er re ” A - e+ & ee ee > " wn - ewes eee eee ee a ee ee ee ee) Mud ited : eh a wun~re , . Se ee * ' aes sll 1 . ‘ Dahm eS ee ated ~ ens — ee Be a ee ee en —-- rere Foe? 0 - mere SO ONE ON Gr ware as SS ee —. . . ‘ " - Stet Aa Al tern a let - . wr oo - - PAM EE ERM OSE Ee PO OD rae °° © FE Th aera ee ee ee ‘ Daten oe 2 frothet tes — > whe : tafce ee har - ey . * — lee te PO. ee ee ee ee ee * he lt A Raat hen oe row eee A Se eee ert * ~~ Rethadietl = ‘ a . — li NR tr Re Rt Mt A * ee ee —~w . * . eas . 7 ong ~ mS ton ® - Ft + et nee ae -_ o> * ee ose 44 . oo » ~~ - * a ates, eh » . a tk a > Man . ie wee « = ARKO a . oe eer a-dua. “ ss — Y - ne at ® rota “ ry » ~~ ° A ‘ ek a ame « : i ~~ e *~ ee . __ A ws . 7 A Me > - . . s ate a reer ees . aha te ate Rahat ~ . ae -4 e —— ar . 2 ata- wr > , “* -o ~ > Ope ee a — — Pate «te 2 mh * > . ee . es > po oe ha . om : — es oe a tele A a > > 29 = 5 . as 0 « nS . ‘a e + be ° - +e ts » ” — " o> - . a # » Olly _ > » ° Fen a os ~ “ ° . ~ Pd tine =F roa ow at - —~ -_ » ~~ ry 2 atch sis. Mr een ial ew ww aint irs . ~ . * + & oto the — o-Sne- » * bus - - » . ie _ * ‘ : mn 7 _ ote pttarl ae -@ rll oe - ~ » « : > a enw ‘ 7 ~< _e . ~ : . a a > oe . a * eee oe & r 4 ee mr ad, a a a ears " - At ow ea . " 4 avewe - ~~ m aa ws - ~ -* one +.-0 2088 - ee a - s a) ~ . - . * rs ‘ - re Swe *n ¢ 7 ee . o 6 “ . © " = El - f’ that) : a ~ > _ * Le * , v -_ > » ee ee ee) . tv a - see rene > 24 Lee eee ee “ . _ ; bh Mette Peta bel 1 a * . - “ be - > + . . . ~' ~~ a “4 . ’ & ° - a - “nee 4 ~—_ . . * . a ams o toe = ‘ be - . - “ me . ear . + ee a ee . - a a ° " ’ > anak pn o Pe > ~* * 4 > owe # * = ~ ‘ : , * . - 4 : - “ mee . a oe . a a tome 5 . ¢ ~~ ’ ot 6 a . - aha > e “ . ° - . e+ o ae . a Ae o rn . = i Het 4 ode . - > ‘ yee >> . - : + ‘ . ee oe | . ’ ¢ . ae ‘ iveoe " —8 a iliad - . -- « ae reer * OO nnn ee - ~ 7 . . eos 4 . “ . - ’ >. . ee oe ee) owe Onde MHF r ‘ . « ~ -t0- 0 ee 2 " . * ade “ : a 1 + n> = Se ee - — 2 * . » te oP OP 24.4 en e TOPE OHO 6-4 oe ee 2 -. + avr t aa ee eee ee ee Wd o-Srdnte where ° ote 4 - . a . “ am aon eh tel ty Sh Aes Gali 4p Pr a A tli tel tte el Ag tm att ti Al Me et Ay Nn De A i A ipo eo tl nathan - - ee eee > ——- 7 = ni tai. oe ee ee ee ee Se ee ee eee er e +e ’ “ ar 1 ‘+ +>. : 4 : . . , . : ‘ ste os + Few * eee eae) eae Fe ee Bee eee PEA POO SOTO OOO ee eee Bi ny Melly. Satyr rat: he treet 8 “Gare es eS Oe eee ey, rer 2 ee. 4, — pee,” >. * nae ee ee " 4 OS 9-* @ OE 7 © 0 herd 4 -*-@ & 4-O-' - et «~ oer we oF ON es ew ee weg ere < <_ ata Nz C9 0 San ees fl x —- Teh -- yr el a, ” (oy 74-06 4a ) » PROCEEDINGS oi: ) J ; vn FA: ro Le alee | AND TRANSACTIONS OF THE LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. VOL. XXXV. SESSION 1920-1921. ie A neOhhliall til tN a , eet a 9 fs AW ., ume ty res iy MAY SG ’ 4 ies é2 * LU 4a 08 \ ew Er) / LIVERPOOL : C. Tintine & Co., Lrp., PRINTERS, 53, Victoria STREET. 19521. afr > se con Oy , ot : = 7 ‘ ; ie pil Ks O89 - $ ¥YUN oh Ww, CONTENTS. —_—__ I.—PROCEEDINGS. Office-bearers and Council, 1920-1921 . Report of the Council Summary of Proceedings at the Meatinics List of Members. Treasurer’s Balance Sheet . II.—TRANSACTIONS. Presidential Address—‘ Sedimentation, Environment, and Evolution in Past Ages.” By Prof. P. G. H. BoswE tL, O.B.E., D.Sc. ‘ The Marine Biological Station at Port Erin, being the Thirty-fourth Annual Report of the Liverpool Marine Biology Committee, now the Oceanography Department of the University of Liverpool. By Prof. W. A. Herp, C.B.E., D.Se., LL.D., F.B.S. “Notes on Dinoflagellates and other Organisms Causing Discolouration of the Sand at Port Erm.” By K. CATHERINE HERDMAN “Note on Some Experiments on the Water Vascular System of Echinus.” By Rutu C. BampBer, M.Sc. *“On the Inheritance of Coat Colour in the Varieties of Rattus rattus.” By J. W. CuTmMore Report for 1920, on the Lancashire Sea-Fisheries Labora- tory at the University of Liverpool, and the Sea-Fish Hatchery at Piel, near Barrow. Edited by Prof. JAMES JOHNSTONE, D.Sc. “Aplysia” (L.M.B.C. Memoir No. XXIV). By NeEwLic B. Eases, B.Sc. PAGE Vil Vill 1x xlll XV1 29 59 64 71 73 183 F ~ a a Ss i ~ 7 i & = x Ss n oS d Pe 7 _ hes ; Ly Fe LY G 4 { rie Les ; ‘ z = 6 oe - . 3 . a j . . \ ks = = ’ vy I a J j * % vf * S ¥ U - ‘ « ’ - e r u \y I~ >. . . . i's - os = ———— ty 7 ‘ . S al 44 4 sea ' 4 ES . ¢ j fo ca az i « “3 —— - = 4 _— is — rs ts J ria “ tae SRO SRA al = ut 9. Tee Atry Ltan on aiF.ed fst ieeneie > i) a) ) ial PROCEEDINGS OF THE LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. & > “ - : = J i £ me 4 us 2 ae = 7 sis am Sorelle YET MOORE 2 Rane tg ae ae Fs — , a z - = pe - : Jt % | 3 is 2 ape | ; A os 7 au . ‘iby i ie 4 oa - t : Py, . a % : : Tae - ' :, = : = >. ’ Pant “3 : = ‘5 eer te ore ey py) Ee PRET tLe beblal ee : 4 eae | f Pett otal Le NP aaa | Me. ub: “a ¥ eS, ; + : =z s ae F . APF, 7, a ‘ ; a yo . a = ; ¥ | | ; P 7 - a“ = j 2, ~ . “ i. . : : 2 = : : Ds ey . a it - z ; = Se , | , - * = : - = : ‘ ‘ “ ; : } : ae : i, ; \ : | , : - Dee | | : 3 i i} z — ae x We A Pe R s ‘. cS i : n : : | | ‘ U Sia 24 a) 7 : ( * -* : » Ay” 7 ¢ = i. = ‘ ——— 2 a ; = . SF — ‘ sae , 7 4 es ae “ 3 : - > e' - ; = > LS , OFFICK-BEARERS 1886—1887 Gx-Dresiwents : 1887—1888 J. J. DRYSDALE, M.D. 1888—1889 Pror. W. A. HERDMAN, D.Sc., F.R.S.E. 1889—1890 Pror. W. A. HERDMAN, D.Sc., F.R.S.E. 1890—1891 T. J. MOORE, C.M.Z.S. 1891—1892 T. J. MOORE, C.M.Z.S. 1892—1893 ALFRED O. WALKER, J.P., F.L.S, 1893—1894 JOHN NEWTON, M.B.C.S. 1894—1895 Pror. F. GOTCH, M.A., F.RB.S. 1895—1896 Pror. R. J. HARVEY GIBSON, M. —1897 HENRY O. FORBES, LL.D., F.Z.S. 1897—1898 ISAAC C. THOMPSON, F.LS., F.R. 1898— 1899—1900 J. WIGLESWORTH, ue 1900—1901 Pror. PATERSON, M.D., 1896 as 1899 Pror. C, S. SHERRINGTON, M. ER. Poe er: 1901—1902 HENRY C. BEASLEY. 1902— 1903 R. CATON, M.D., F.R.C.P. 1903—1904 Rev. T. 8. LEA, M.A. 1904—1905 ALFRED LEICESTER. 1905— 1906—1907 Pror. W. A. HERDMAN, D.Sc., F.R.S. US 1906 JOSEPH LOMAS, F.G.S. 1908 W. T. HAYDON, F.L.S. 1908—1909 Pror. B. MOORE, M.A., D.Sc. 1909—1910 R. NEWSTEAD, M.Sc., F.E.S. 1910— 1911 Pror. R. NEWSTEAD, M.Sc., F.R.S. 1911—1912 J. H. OCONNELL, L.B.C.P. Loi12— 1913 JAMES JOHNSTONE, D.Sc. 1913—1914 C. J. MACALISTER, M.D., F.R.C.P. 1914—1915 Pror. J. W. W. 1915—1916 Pror. ERNEST GLYNN, M.A., M.D. AND COUNCIL Pror. W. MITCHELL BANKS, M.D., F.B.C.S. STEPHENS, M.D., D.P.H. 1916—1917 Pror. J. S. MACDONALD, L.B.C.P., F.B.S. 1917—1918 JOSEPH A. CLUBB, D.Sc. 1918—1919 Pror. W. RAMSDEN, M.A., D.M. 19191920 HUGH R. RATHBONE, M.A., J.P. Pror. W. A. HERDMAN, C.B.E., D.Sc., Hon. Crevsurer: W. J. HALLS. S. T. BURFIELD, B.A., R. CATON, M.D., F.R.C.P J. A. CLUBB, D.Sc. J. W. CUTMORE. Pror. W. J. DAKIN, D.Sc., F.L.S. G. ELLISON. SESSION XXXIV, 1920-1921. President : Pror. P. G. H. BOSWELL, O.B.E., D.Sc ‘Mice- Presidents : HUGH R. RATHBONE, M.A., J.P. Hon. Secretary: W. RIMMER TEAREH, A.C.P. Council: ERS. Hon. Librarian: MAY ALLEN, B.A. ALWEN M. EVANS, M.Sc. (Miss) Pror. J. JOHNSTONE, D.Sc. W. S. LAVEROCK, J. H. MILTON, F.G.S. Pror. R. NEWSTEAD, M.Se., F.R.S. M.A., B.Sc. Pror. W. RAMSDEN, M.A., D.M. Representatie of Students’ Section : Miss M. BOWEN, B.Sc. Vill. LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. REPORT of the COUNCIL. — Durinc the Session 1920-21 there have been seven ordinary evening meetings. The annual excursion was held on June 18th, when a visit was paid to the Grosvenor Museum at Chester, and a very enjoyable afternoon was spent. The communications made to the Society at the ordmary meetings have been representative of many branches of Biology, and the various exhibitions and demonstrations thereon have been of the utmost interest and value. The form of the meeting on March 14th was somewhat of a new departure. The President received the members and a number of guests in the Zoology department, which, together with the Geology and Oceanography departments, was thrown open to inspection. On May 6th, Prof. J. B. Farmer, F.R.S., D.Sc., of the Imperial College of Science had intended to address the Society, but was prevented by indisposition from doing so. It is hoped that he will be able to be present at one of the meetings of next session. The Library continues to make satisfactory progress, and additional important exchanges have been arranged. The Treasurer’s statement and balance sheet are appended. The members at present on the roll are as follows :— Ordinary members ee - se pie ee 48 Associate members e ae oe ed 5S: 12 Student members, including Students’ Section, about 30 Total += Eds 2s 90 SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS AT MEETINGS. 1x SUMMARY of PROCEEDINGS at the MEETINGS. The first meeting of the thirty-fifth session was held at the University, on Friday, October 15th, 1920. 1. The Report of the Council on the Session 1919-1920 (see “Proceedings,” Vol. XXXIV, p. viii) was submitted and adopted. 2. The Treasurer’s Balance Sheet for the Session 1919-1920 (see ‘‘ Proceedings,” Vol. XXXIV, p. xvi) was submitted and approved. 3. The followmg Office-bearers and Council for the ensuing Session were elected :—Vice-Presidents, Hugh R. Rathbone, M.A., J.P., Prof. Herdman, D.Sc., F.RB.S. ; Hon. Treasurer, W. J. Halls; Hon. Librarian, May Allen, B.A.; Hon. Secretary, W. Rimmer Teare, A.C.P.; Council, 8. T. Burfield, B.A., M.Sc., R. Caton, M.D., F.R.C.P., J. A. Clubb, D.Sc., J. W. Cutmore; Prof. W. J. Dakin, D.Sc., F.L.S., G. Ellison, Alwen M. Hivans, M.Sc. (Miss), Prof. J. Johnstone, D.Sc., W. 5S. Laverock, M.A., B.Sc., J. H. Milton, F.G.8., Prof. R. Newstead, M.Sc., F.R.S., Prof. W. Ramsden, M.A., D.M. 4. Prof. P. G. H. Boswell, D.Sc., delivered the Presidential Address on “ Sedimentation, Environment, and Evolu- tion in Past Ages ” (see “ Transactions,” p. 3). A vote of thanks proposed by Dr. Caton, seconded by Prof. Johnstone, was passed. x LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. The second meeting of the thirty-fifth session was held at the University, on Friday, November 12th, 1920, Dr. Clubb presiding. 1. Prof. Herdman submitted the report which he had prepared ‘for The Liverpool Marine Biology Committee drawing attention to special portions and illustrating his remarks by slides and specimens. (See “ Transactions,” p. 29.) The third meeting of the thirty-fifth session was held at the University, on Friday, December 10th, 1920. The President in the Chair. 1. A paper by Miss E. Catherine Herdman on “ Dinoflagellates and other Organisms causing Discolouration of the Sand at Port Erm ” (see “ Transactions,” p. 59). 2. A paper by Miss R. C. Bamber, M.Sc., on “ Some Experi- ments on the Water Vascular System of Echinus ” (see “Transactions,” p. 64). The fourth meeting of the thirty-fifth session was held at the University, on Friday, January 14th, 1921. The President in the Chair. 1. Prof. Herdman exhibited a butterfly’s wing displayed on a card in a wonderful manner by a Japanese craftsman. 2. Mr. Burfield, B.A., M.Sc., exhibited several West African specimens, together with the foetus of a whale (Megapter longimana). 3. Mr. Cutmore read some notes on “ The Inheritance of Coat Colour in the Varieties of Rattus rattus”’ (see “ Tran- sactions, p. 71). | 4. Mr. E. Neaverson, B.Sc., gave an account of modern ideas on the Evolution of Ammonites. SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS AT MEETINGS. xl The fifth meeting of the thirty-fifth session was held at the University, on Friday, February 11th, 1921. The President in the Chair. 1. In his unavoidable absence, Prof. Johnstone forwarded the Report for 1920 on the Lancashire Sea-Fisheries Laboratory (see “ Transactions,” p. 73). 2. Mr. R. J. Daniels, B.Sc., explained the result of the investi- gations on the connection between sea-temperatures and tides. 3. Mr. W. Birtwistle discussed the scales and otoliths of fish in relation to their age and development. The sixth meeting of the thirty-fifth session was held at the University, on Monday, March 14th, 1921. The President received the members and a number of visitors in the Zoology department, in the Library of which refreshments were pro- vided. By kind consent of Prof. Dakin and Prof. Johnstone, the President was enabled to throw not only the Geology, but the Zoology and Oceanography departments open to his guests. Specimens and apparatus were exhibited, and the members of the stafis of all three departments explained them to those present. The seventh meeting of the thirty-fifth session was held at the University, on Friday, May 6th, 1921. The President in the Chair. By invitation of the President, Prof. Farmer of the Imperial College of Science had consented to address the Society on “ Alpines,’ but was, unfortunately, too ill to be -present. At short notice, the President prepared and delivered an account of a Geological Survey of the south of the Isle of Man conducted by a party at Haster last. The lecture was illustrated by many slides and proved of great interest. Xl LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. The eighth meeting of the thirty-fifth session was held on Saturday, June 18th. A visit to Chester had been arranged mainly by Prof. R. Newstead, F.R.S., who met the members and conducted them to the Grosvenor Museum. Here Prof. Newstead and Mr. Alfred Newstead, F.E.S., Curator, described ~ the various exhibits, the Roman and Natural History sections claiming special attention. At a meeting held in the Museum it was unanimously resolved, on the motion of the President, that Herbert R. Rathbone, Esq., C.C., be elected President for the ensuing session. Dr. Clubb was appointed delegate of the Society to the British Association Meeting at Edinburgh. Warm thanks are due to the Chester Education Committee, the Chester Archeological Society, and the Chester Society of Natural Science, as well as to Prof. Newstead and the Curator, for the kind hospitality extended to the Society at the Museum. ELECTED, 1908 1919 1909 1918 1913 1903 1919 1912 1886 1886 1920 1917 1910 1920 1902 1886 1896 1886 Xlll LIST of MEMBERS of the LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. SESSION 1920-1921. A. Orpinary MEMBERS. (Life Members are marked with an asterisk.) Abram, Prof. J. Hill, M.D., F.R.C.P., 74, Rodney Street, Liverpool. Adami, Dr. J. G., F.R.S., Vice-Chancellor, The University, Liverpool. *Allen, May, B.A., Hon. Lrprarian, University, Liverpool. Baldwin, Mrs., M.Se., Zoology Dept., University, Liverpool. Beattie, Prof. J. M., M.A., M.D., The University, Liverpool. Booth, Chas., Cunard Building, Liverpool. Boswell, Prof. P. G. H., O.B.E., D.Sc., PREstpENT, The University, Liverpool. Burfield, 8. T., B.A., M.Se., Zoology Department, University, Liverpool. Caton, R., M.D., F.R.C.P., 7, Sunny Side, Prince’s Park, Liverpool. Clubb, J. A., D.Sc., Free Public Museums, Liverpool. Dakin, Prof. W. J., D.Sc., F.L.8., The University, Liverpool. Duvall, Miss H. M., M.Sc., Zoology Department, Univer- sity, Liverpool. Ellison, George, 52, Serpentine Road, Wallasey. Elton, Charles, “ Wensted,” Grassendale Park, Liverpool. Glynn, Prof. Ernest, M.D., F.R.C.P.,.67, Rodney Street. Halls, W. J., Hon. Treasurer, 2, Townfield Road, West Kirby. Haydon, W. T., F.L.S., 55, Grey Road, Walton. Herdman, Prof. W. A., D.Sc., F.R.S., Vicz-PREsIDENT, University, Liverpool. X1V 1893 1912 1902 1903 1920 1898 1918 1896 1915 1917 1904 1913 1915 1921 1903 1890 1894 1908 1886 1920 1903 1913 1915 1903 1905 1889 LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Herdman, Mrs. W. A., Croxteth Lodge, Ullet Road, Liverpool. Hobhouse, J. R., 19, Ullet Road, Liverpool. Holt, Dr. A., Rocklands, Thornton Hough, Cheshire. Holt, Richard D., India Buildings, Liverpool. Johnstone, Angus, 63, Church Road, St. Michael’s, Liverpool. Johnstone, Prof. James, D.Sc., University, Liverpool. Jones, Philip, “ Brantwood,”’ St. Domingo Grove, Liver- pool. Laverock, W. 8., M.A., B.Sc., Free Public Museums, Liverpool. Macdonald, Prof. J. §., B.A., F.R.S., The University, Liverpool. Milton, J. H., F.G.8., Merchant Taylors’ School, Great Crosby. Newstead, Prof. R., M.Sc., F.R.S., University, Liverpool. Pallis, Mark, Tatoi, Aigburth Drive, Liverpool. Prof. W. Ramsden, M.A., D.M., University, Liverpool. Rathbone, Herbert R., C.C., 35, Ullet Road, Liverpool. Rathbone, Hugh R., M.A., J.P., Vick-PRESIDENT, Greenbank, Liverpool. *Rathbone, Miss May, 29, Upper Berkeley Street, London, 1 Scott, Andrew, A.L.S., Piel, Barrow-in-Furness. Share-Jones, J., D.Sc., F.R.C.V.S., University, Liverpool. Smith, Andrew T., “‘ Solna,” Croxteth Drive, Liverpool. Southwell, T., School of Tropical Medicine, University, Liverpool. : Stapledon, W. C., “ Annery,” Caldy, West Kirby. Stephens, Prof. J. W. W., M.D., University, Liverpool. Teare, W. Rimmer, A.C.P., Hon. Srcretary, 12, Bentley Road, Birkenhead. Thomas, Dr. Thelwall, 84, Rodney Street, Liverpool. Thompson, Edwin, “ Woodlands,” 13, Fulwood Park, Liverpool. Thornely, Miss L. R., Hawkshead, Ambleside. LIST OF MEMBERS. xv 1888 ‘Toll, J. M., 49, Newsham Drive, Liverpool. 1920 Walker, Prof. C., D.Sc., M.R.C.8S., The University, Liverpool. 1918 Whitley, Edward, Bio-Chemical Laboratory, University. 1920 Yorke, Prof. Warrington, M.D., School of Tropical Medicine, University, Liverpool. B. Assoctate MEMBERS. 1916 Atkin, Miss D., High School for Girls, Aigburth Vale. Liverpool. 1915 Bisbee, Mrs., M.Sc., Zoology Department, The Univer- sity, Liverpool. 1914 Cutmore, J. W., Free Public Museums, Liverpool. 1918 Evans, Miss Alwen M., M.Sc., School of Tropical Medicine, University, Liverpool. 1916 Gleave, Miss EK. L., M.Sc., Oulton Secondary School, Clarence Street, Liverpool. 1905 Harrison, Oulton, 3, Montpellier Crescent, New Brighton. 1920 Kewlev, Miss Helen C., 10, Park Road N., Birkenhead. 1919 Mayne, Miss C., B.Sc., 17, Laburnum Road, Fairfield. 1919 Sleggs, G. F., B.Sc., Zoology Dept., University, Liver- pool. 1915 Stafford, Miss C. M. P., B.Sc., 312, Hawthorne Road, Bootle. 1917 Swift, Miss F., B.Sc., Queen Mary High School, Anfield. 1912 Wilson, Mrs. Gordon, High Schools for Girls, Aigburth Vale, Liverpool. | C. University STuDENTS’ SECTION. President : Miss M. Bowen, B.Sc. Secretary ; Miss D. M. R. Allan, B.Sc. (Contains about 30 members.) D. Honorary MEMBERS. S.A.S., Albert I., Prince de Monaco, 10, Avenue du Trocadéro, Paris. Bornet, Dr. Edouard, Quai de la Tournelle 27, Paris. Fritsch, Prof. Anton, Museum, Prague, Bohemia. Hanitsch, R., Ph.D., Oxford. ‘aa NTO “V Hdwsor add00 punof puvn papipny IZ6L ‘Y2L 090209 ‘1oOdumAIT 0 8 SIF 0 8 &ITs 8 Jaq g Cee eee eccwccessace At OU nul gue spied MAsieee SCO EL TT UT ysep 66 OL ST T eeccceccccscces Cec eec creed ecarccsccccccecsece 4So1oquy yued a3 OL ial 63 Cee eecescnveeecee FS RIOOREE DE UE dca | ul eouRl[ eg «eo 9 en G Peer re ercese rer eseseseseeireces JUOULSOAUT uLoay qsorloqguy ee OT GC T Covcoscvesesccovcsece ec eee sosuodxiy § A184O1N0Q “UOFT 46 OL OT c Cececcvecncccccccesceccee eeccevece @cccee eee SouUNO A jo ales a3 9 p L Cece ee eee eeeeeceetces eeress eee eeeeee **SOuUIN[O A. jo epeysog ia 0 1 T ecccccces eee s ccc eet eee ses ees (soqvloossy ) 4¢ «c II 61 V4 ACO OICIOIOIOIOOIOICIOICIOOIOICICIOICIOIO ICICI ROILICEOIOIOICOIO ICI icici icici ir ari sees oly CO, «6 0 i T Cee ccc cesece cer ece eee ese vencce (queg kq) rele (a3 6 T rere) Se ececcce og) oy SuUT[UL], "SISSOPL ¢¢ 0) OL OL eeccccvcscee Career ensaceseesees (savorty ut) ce ee 0 y G eco ccccene pe cce reece sce ceece eccccce Arvaquy Jo oouUvINSUT 6 0 g PG AOOIOIOOOICIOIIOICITOCIOIOIOIOMIOIOIO TOIT TOCIOOOICION ICCa ICC } . suolydiaosqng c¢ 9 6I 0 eee cen ccseseces seers 09 morgonpordoyy JW ULOT}1O NT OL OL T T9 Cec cca veces ccacececcecesees eee UOISSOG qSB] ULOI] ooURlVg kg 4) TE 5; "IZ6L ‘WI0 “340g OF 48ST “490 ‘OZET DE 5; ‘IGGL “GI0E “Fog 07 ST “9OO “OZET 1G ‘UMHUNSVaUT, ‘NOH ‘STTVH ‘f£ ‘M HIM LNAODDY NT tip) -“ALAIDOS TWOlOOTOID TOOdd4dA rl SHL TRANSACTIONS OF THE LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS. By P. G. H. Boswett, A.R.C.Sc., D.Sc. George Herdman Professor of Geology in the University of Tver pool. (Read October 15th, 1920.) Durine the past session the Society has sustained the loss of two of its most distmguished members. Hrnry CHARLES Brastey died on December 14th, 1919, at the age of 83. He occupied the Presidential Chair of this Society during the session 1901-2, and was Secretary of the Liverpool Geological Society from 1890 to 1900, and its President for the sessions 1887-9, 1904-6, and 1908-9. His work on fossil footprints gave him a wide reputation, and he accumulated an excellent collection of Triassic footprints largely from Storeton and other quarries in this district. In addition he obtained a fine series of photographs of various footprints scattered throughout the museums of the country. He published many papers on the subject in the “ Proceedings of the Liverpool Geological Society,” and wrote reports for the British Association Committee which dealt with the Investiga- tion of the Fauna and Flora of the Trias of the British Isles, of which Committee he was for a time Secretary. This work was recognised by the award to him in 1906 of the proceeds of the Barlow-Jameson Fund of the Geological Society of London, and by the posthumous award of the recently-mstituted medal of the Liverpool Geological Society. 4 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. His splendid collection of footprints was purchased last year by Councillor C. Sydney Jones and presented to the Liverpool Public Museum; his albums of photographs were presented to the Liverpool Geological Society, and his other geological material has been acquired by the Geological Depart- ment of the University. Mr. Beasley was imbued with the spirit of the fine old British amateur geologists. Although active commercial duties left him scanty leisure for geology, he pursued the Science with unabated vigour until illness compelled him to relinquish the work. His kindly and helpful disposition endeared him to his friends. On May 28th, 1920, at the early age of 42, Lronarp DoncasTER, Derby Professor of Zoology in the University of Liverpool, passed away. Perhaps the most brilliant of the younger school of British zoologists, he was early attracted to the problems of variation and heredity, to which he applied the exact methods of cytological research. A believer in the theory of Mendelism, he was led on to problems relating to the determination of sex, his work upon which constitutes a milestone in the progress of biology. His books upon “ The Determination of Sex” and “ The Study of Cytology ” remain a monument to his memory as well as an indication of what we have lost by his early death. We knew him as a colleague for barely a short session, but his humanity, charm, and uprightness commanded our affection and respect. To use Professor Herdman’s words, his death was nothing less than a calamity to the University of Liverpool and, one would add, to the cause of Science. SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 5 SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION IN PAST AGES. When we review the two chief classes of rocks which constitute the crust of the earth, the igneous or fire-formed rocks, and the clastic or. sedimentary rocks, we cannot fail to note the difference in the extent to which we know them. The characters of the igneous rocks have been studied by geologists in greater detail than those of the sedimentary rocks, so much so, in fact, that the petrology of the former—their origin, history, and the control of their mineral constitution by physical laws—has reached the stage of philosophic treat- - ment. In contrast to this, the very wealth of organic remains found in most of the clastic or sedimentary rocks has in many cases diverted attention from their mineral and mechanical characters and has left the field of the petrology of sediments relatively obscure. On the one hand we find that the branch of geological science which deals with igneous rocks is becoming more and more amenable to mathematical treatment ; on the other hand, the study of sediments has only in recent years become quantitative. It is one of the tenets of geology that the present is the key to the past. But im many cases we have no certain informa- tion as to the conditions under which ancient sediments were laid down ; criteria are lackmg because our acquaintance with the mode of formation of similar deposits at the present day is insufficient and mexact. This lack of knowledge is the more to be regretted since, apart fron the features displayed by the entombed fossils themselves, the nature and character of the sediments provide the only clues to the environments in which the organisms dwelt, and which may have caused or modified. the evolution of lineages. The environmental conditions would not always leave their impress upon the rocks, but it is probable that many which did so have left traces that are insufficiently 6 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. recognized or even wrongly interpreted. Broader climatic changes have affected deposits so markedly that the corre- sponding conditions have doubtless been rightly adduced, but the effects of the lesser changes are only now being recognized. Sedimentation —Certain fundamental considerations in regard to the formation of sedimentary rocks first, perhaps, deserve emphasis. As an ideal case, let us imagine that a continental area composed of an igneous rock, such as granite, is subjected to denudation, the gradient of the rivers being sufficient to transport the bulk of the resulting detritus to the seashore. As the transporting power of the rivers is checked on their entering the sea, pebbles and gravelly detritus formerly rolled along their beds will be deposited. Along-shore and tidal currents distribute the material right or left, and storms pile it up as beaches, where it often becomes mixed with other coarse material resulting from the direct erosion of the land by the sea. The pounding of the waves completes the rounding of the constituents already begun by the rivers, and a belt of shingle extending from above high-water mark to varying depths, often below low-water mark, is the result. Beyond the shingle belt, the river carries its sand, which in turn settles down when the velocity of the stream falls to a few millimetres per second. In due time the sand is distributed as a seaward belt fringing and interdigitating with the shingle. Similarly a band of silt is deposited, and lastly, the finest portion of the burden, the mud, sinks to the bottom. It was formerly considered that the last constituent, the mud or clayey material, was laid down only when the water was practically still, and that its deposition therefore indicated fairly deep water well below the mfluence of waves or shore currents. On the contrary, deposition of mud, resulting as it does from the flocculation of the river-borne clay particles by the dissolved SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 7 salts in sea-water,* proceeds part passu with the deposition of sand and silt or even fine shingle. For this reason, the majority of sediments, both ancient and modern, are of mixed “ grade ” and carry more or less clayey and silty material. Perfection of grading (that is, the attamment of perfect evenness of size) is a true phenomenon and is rarely met with in geological strata or present-day sediments. Only by the long-continued action of wind and water currents, particularly wind, are clastic materials sorted effectively. In Fig. 1, representing ideal conditions, a, b, c, and d indicate in section the belts of shingle, sand, silt and mud respectively. It is instructive to consider the effect on their distribution of earth-movements such as are continually in progress. Omitting from present consideration the change m the proportion of the various river-borne constituents resulting from increased or diminished denudation due to the con- sequential greater or less elevation of the country (see p. 10), it is evident that upon subsidence of the area, a corresponding series of deposits will be laid down upon the new sea-bed represented by XX. In consequence of the creep of the sea over the land, each belt of detritus a’, b’, c’, and d’ will occur shghtly landward of the corresponding one below, and not exactly vertically over it. A continuation of the subsidence will result in a further series a”, 6”, c’, and d” occupying the position indicated. Ifthe movement has been gradual and not intermittent, the planes XX, Y Y, which are true time-planes, may be obliterated, and the fact that the deposits a, 6, c, and d, or a’, b’, c’, and d’, are contemporaneous, may not be obvious. Subsequent elevation and possibly denudation may result in such a series of rocks forming the surface of the land. In the event of a, b, c, and d not containing fossils, or, what provides equal difficulty, containing different fossil forms as a * River-water containing salts of calcium and magnesium in solution also flocculates mud and causes its deposition. TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY ay a ., Souvld-surppeq,, sv 1OFRT pojordaoqur eq Avur pur “suoistarp [VoIsoloyyty yo yaeur ee9 ‘AL ‘ele ‘mm pu ‘souv]d-oul} enay oar 22 LA EN sourld oy, ‘oqo a) Shay OS[® Olv sR ‘snooursodureyu0e urese ore p °O ‘q ‘wv sqisodep oy, "U10440q-8es SuIsIa e uO SUOTFIPUOD SUI4ROIpUT nq ‘T ‘Bip sy °z DIT =>_ Z PRPs | \>nay voC ‘sounld-[eorsojoy4ry Ou} PUB souvid-ourry oy4 WOOM}0q GOURpP.AOOSIp OF 9 T]IM I9qyveIS 044 ‘OUT[-e10Y48 OY4 19d90}8 oy, ‘soueld-surppoq az0j MOYCISIUL OG ‘poqyeprITosuoo o1% SJUSWUIPSS oy Uy ‘Leur pue ‘iey4ouR euo (MOF SUOISIAIP [VoIsoToYyTy HO yavur “oqe ‘AA old) “pp soured om, “UOTFe{UOUMIpES UL sosned ore o10q4 Jt ] vas fe |Re\reag ¢ }?A>} vag SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 9 result of differing environment, a strong tendency will exist for a, a’, a’, etc., to be grouped together on account of litho- logical similarity. Such an occurrence is almost inevitable if the deposits are in due course mapped geologically, for the time-planes XX, YY are difficult to follow, and the planes aa, 88 become more strongly developed because of the varia- tion in lithology above and below them; they are, in fact, the stratigraphical planes or bedding-planes as commonly known, planes which are usually and tacitly assumed to be true time-planes, but which actually cut across the latter. Only under exceptional conditions of fossil preservation, and then by accurate and detailed zonal study alone, can the true contemporaneity of deposits be determined. The complementary case of a rising shore is represented ideally in Fig. 2, where the deposits are seen to be thrown successively seawards as elevation occurs. Again the litho- logical planes aa, 88 cut across the true time-planes XX, YY, and the deposits a, b, c, and d, and a’, b’, c’, and d’, are respectively contemporaneous. After subsidence, “ interform- ational conglomerates,” such as that bounded by aa and ££, may be formed. In plan, the effects of this discordance between the two sets of planes would appear as Fig. 3, where the letters have the same significance as in Figs. 1 and 2. Since topography, drainage, soil, and vegetation are largely dependent upon the hthological character of the underlying rocks, the lines repre- senting the traces of the planes 88, yy would probably be mapped as the “ boundaries” of the “ formation.” The time- planes, revealed by the contained fossils, would run obliquely through the “‘ formation ” as XX, YY, etc. (the broken lines). Nevertheless, the planes 88, yy are actually parallel to the shore-line, whilst XX, Y Y are not. From Figs. 1 and 2, it is evident that the steeper the shore, the greater will be the discordance between aa, 88, yy, etc., 10 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. and XX, YY, ZZ, etc. The shallower and flatter the bottom, the more nearly are the two sets of planes coincident, but they can never coincide whilst dry land and sea both exist in proximity. If, therefore, we are able to discover in the outcrops of strata the degree of discordance, we obtain evidence of the character of the earth-movement at the time of deposition. If the subsidence is rapid, the landward shifting of a’, a’ and 6’, b” in relation to each other and to a, 6 is respectively greater and they will become much attenuated, partly as a result of the greater area over which a given quantity of débris will be spread, and partly owing to the decreased erosion due to the lowering of the Jand. The more rapid the subsidence the more obvious will be the phenomenon of overlap, and the greater the amount of transgression. The existence of overlap when the downward movement is gentle and continuous is not necessarily shown by lithology, but may be revealed by the organic remains if the conditions were suitable for development and preservation of life. Rapid elevation will clearly give rise to penecontempora- neous erosion of the series of deposits formed when the land stood at a lower level, and the new series of deposits may contain rolled fragments derived from the older series. The plane of junction between the series a, b, c, d, and a’, 0’, c, d’ may appear only as an ordinary bedding-plane, although it is actually of the nature of a disconformity. As im the case of rapid subsidence, the result upon the outcrop will be discontinuity of particular lithological phases. But im all probability the most noteworthy result of the elevation will be the sudden increase in the quantity of detritus due to the activity of the agencies of denudation upon the elevated land. The rapidity of the movement will prevent the coarser materials from being either well-graded or well-rounded. Evidence of penecontemporaneous erosion may well be obscured in the SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 11 abundance of new sediment. If the elevation be gentle, the increase of sedimentation will be gradual, and the phenomena of penecontemporaneous erosion and seaward thickening will be more evident. The sequence of sediments considered above is an ideal one and can arise only where gravelly, sandy, and clayey detritus together with dissolved material is brought down from the land. At the present day extensive areas of igneous rocks form but a small portion of the land-masses of continents, and the greater part of the continental margins is composed of ancient sediments which have, in the normal course of events, been differentiated more or less effectively into the lithological series discussed above. Offshore deposits derived from such sediments will necessarily vary according to the constitution of their parent material. Clay may thus form the littoral belt entirely, or it may even lie on the landward side of a sand-belt. It is probable that the character of the local Jand-mass determines more than any other factor the distribu- tion of the sediments in the offshore belt, or even of those beyond it. If the above theoretical considerations may be adopted, we should expect to find some evidence, among the extra- ordinary variety of rocks in Britam, of such occurrences in the geological past. For obvious reasons, examples may not be numerous—evidence may not be preserved, or investigation may not yet have been carried out in sufficient detail. Attention may, however, be drawn to certain notable cases. The crossing of the time-planes by the lithological planes is well illustrated by the series of fossiliferous sands occupying the uppermost portion of the Lias and the lowermost of the Inferior Oolite in the West of England. The sands extend from the Dorset coast to the Cotteswolds and have been variously termed Bridport Sands, Yeovil Sands, Midford Sands, Cotteswold Sands, etc., after the localities at which they occur. 12 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. The careful zonal work of Mr. 8. 8. Buckman* has shown that their age varies from place to place, for they yield an ammonite fauna in which many sub-divisions can be recognized. The Lias, generally speaking, is a clay-formation, and the Inferior Oolite consists chiefly of limestones. In the area considered, a shallower phase characterised by the deposition of calcareous sands set in towards the end of Liassic times and continued throughout part of Inferior Oolite times. But this phase of shallowing and deposition of detrital sandy material passed as a wave southwards, maintaining a peculiar, unusual, and easily recognizable lithology and petrography. The similarity in grade and mineral composition of the sands from Bridport to the Cotteswolds is indeed extraordinary. Expressed dia- grammatically, the sands appear in plan as in Fig. 3, COTTESWOLD SANDS MIDFORD SANDS YEOVIL SANDS BRIDPORT SANDS Fic. 3. Diagrammatic representation of the time-planes in the Lias- Inferior Oolite Sands, from the Dorset Coast to the Cotteswolds. where the belt aa, Bf is the lithological deposit as it is mapped. * Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., Vol. 45 (1889), p. 440, and Vol. 66 (1910), p. 52. SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. = 13 The time-planes cross it as shown, the hemere* named after the various ammonites which characterise the horizons being indicated in the diagram. The portions of each sand- belt between a pair of dotted lines may be taken as practically contemporaneous. The conditions thus indicate a gently rising and. tilted shore-line, beginning as a shallow sea in the Cotteswold district whilst the area of Dorset was submerged under deeper water, and becoming progressively shallow over the belt towards what is now the English Channel. The transgression of a lithological phase across time divisions marked by definite faunal assemblages may be illustrated by another of the many examples from the strati- eraphy of Britain. Professor E. J. Garwood, in his description of the Carboniferous Limestone of the N.W. of England,} has discussed the evidence for the incoming of shallow-water conditions during the formation of the zones of Michelinia and Productus corrugato-henusphericus in the district between Shap and Ravenstonedale. Coral-bearing limestones, indicative of clear-water conditions, give place to a sandy type of sedimen- tation which begins at the base of Michelinia-zone at Shap, and transgresses several taunal horizons in a southerly direction until at Ravenstonedale it appears only at the middle of the sub-zone of P. corrugato-hemisphericus, 100 feet above the base. The sandy conditions also persisted to a later date (1.e., to a higher horizon) in the former district. The actual thickness of sandy sediment is, however, greater in the south (Raven- stonedale) than in the north (Shap), despite the fact that it occupied less geological time in accumulation as measured by the faunal horizons. * The term “‘ hemera”’ was introduced by S. 8. Buckman (1893): ‘‘ to mark the acme of development of one or more species. It is designed as a chronological division . . .” (Q.J.G.S., Vol. 49, p. 481.) The term “zone ”’ is strictly a stratigraphical one. T Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., Vol. 78 (1912), p. 449. 14 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. The effect of gentle subsidence of the shore has been shown to be the lapping of successive members of a rock-series over one another, each thus encroaching on the land area. Overlap of this type is found in the buried Mesozoic rocks under the Wealden area, where the Lias extends beyond and unconformably covers the Trias, and is in turn overlapped by the Bathonian (and possibly the Bajocian) which creeps up over the ancient and eroded surface of Coal Measures. Overlaps of the Purbeck rocks by the Wealden, and of the Wealden by the Lower Greensand also occur. In these examples, the subsidence appears to have been fairly gentle, although there is evidence of elevation and erosion at many levels, and the successive members of the Jurassic maintain approximately the characters they bear in the north-east of France. where some of them crop out. Hach also extends only a short distance beyond its underlying deposit, and little overstepping of the Palaeozoic rocks occurs. Somewhat different is the case of the great overlap which began with the Gault, continued with the Upper Greensand, and culminated in the great spread of the Lower Chalk sea, termed “the Cenomanian Transgression.” The Gault and Upper Greensand (Selbornian) sea, extending beyond the limits of the Lower Cretaceous, Jurassic, Triassic, and other rocks, washed the shores of the old Palaeozoic land now underlying the east of England. The Upper Greensand sea swept rapidly westward forming a plane of marme denudation and trans- gressing the various divisions of the secondary strata until it deposited its sands and gravels upon the Palaeozoic rocks of the west (Haldon Hills, Devon). The Cenomanian sea marked an even greater subsidence, which carried it beyond the north of Ireland and north-west of Scotland. The deposits of Greensand and Chalk (both of Cenomanian age) rest upon Jurassic rocks in these areas, and whilst denudation may have since removed them in part, they probably indicate by their SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 15 outcrops the relative rapidity of the subsidence. It is likely, however, that the eastern area of Palaeozoic rocks subsided even more rapidly, so that it was speedily overstepped by a covering of Gault, Greensand, and Chalk. The purity of the Upper and Middle Chalk and its freedom from terrigenous matter is doubtless related to the low altitude of the Cretaceous land-surface and the distance from large rivers or from those with other than a gentle gradient. These conditions followed naturally from the rapid and widespread depression in Cenomanian times. In the earlier portion of this paper (p. 9 and Fig. 2), an 99 ‘interformational conglomerate”? was demonstrated as being produced during elevation and subsequent subsidence of the land. Such oscillatory action seems to have been connected with the formation of the Blackheath Pebble-beds in Hocene times. The extraordinarily wide area covered by this deposit of rounded flint pebbles (derived obviously from the flints of the Chalk) and its even thickness preclude the possibility of the whole deposit being contemporaneous. It 1s doubtless a litho- logical phase traversed by time-planes, but the absence of fossils of determinative character makes proof impossible. The overlap of the Thanet Beds by the Woolwich and Reading Beds, and of the latter by Blackheath Beds, which rest directly on the Chalk near its escarpment in Kent and Surrey, indicates an initial subsidence of the area; but the pebble-beds are essentially shallow-water deposits, and their wide extension from the Chalk, back over the Woolwich and Reading Beds in turn, indicates a gradual subsequent elevation, accompanied in all probability by penecontemporaneous erosion. The existence of similar spreads of pebbly deposits is in itself evidence of instability. The Bunter pebble-beds of the Trias and the Old Red Sandstone conglomerates may be cited, although these deposits may be of the nature of intermontane detrital accumulations rather than interformational conglomerates. 16 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. A striking example of the relatively rapid elevation of a shore-line is furnished by the East Anglian Crag deposits (Phocene). The Coralline Crag is indicative of deeper-water conditions than those of the overlying Red Crag. The Red Crag consists of shelly sands, obviously drifted into position in shallow bays which may have been partly land-locked. Judged by the fauna, the oldest Red Crag occurs around Walton-on-the-Naze in Essex, and the deposits become succes- sively newer as we travel northwards into the area of the Norwich Crag. Mr. F. W. Harmer* has divided the Red and Norwich Crags into a series of zones. Whether the term “zone ”’ can be justifiably apphed to the divisions is a matter of no import, for there are certainly different faunal horizons. But the Red and Norwich Crag zones succeed one another northwards, and never overlie one another. In short, the elevation was sufficiently rapid to give rise to the conditions indicated in Fig. 2. It was poimted out on p. 10 that an accompanying phenomenon of rapid upheaval was penecontem- poraneous erosion of the older and elevated members of the sedimentary series. The Crags provide an example of this, for broken and water-worn shells from the older Red oe deposits occur in the newer zones.t Envvronment.—It is well-known that the fossil remains found in sediments vary considerably in abundance and in character, probably as a result of the mfluence of the environ- ment upon the organisms. So far as we know at present, the evidence of environment retained in clastic rocks is generally as detailed in the followmg paragraphs. Deductions regarding the environments of ancient times depend upon the fundamental principle of geology already enunciated, namely, that the present is the key to the past.t That we are only in the early * Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., Vol. 56 (1900), p. 705. + P. G. H. Boswell. Proc. Geol. Assoc., Vol. 24 (1913), p. 330. { For a comparison of ancient climates and past conditions of sedi- mentation with those of the present day see Professor W. W. Watts, Pres. Address Geol. Soc., Vol. 67 (1911). SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 17 stages of the interpretation of past conditions seems to be proved by the recent work of the American geologists, both on the ancient strata and on the special characteristics of forma- tions being built up at the present time. When the study of modern sediments, aqueous and continental, has become more intensive, we shall doubtless be able to discover criteria at present unrecognized in the rocks of various ages, and to form in consequence more exact ideas as to the mode of origin, climate, and rainfall, relation to shore-lines and so forth.* Indications of the environment at the time of formation of rocks may be yielded along the following lines :— (1) The Medium. Air or water, as indicated by the fossils themselves. (2) Depth of Water, as shown by the lithology of the deposit and the character of its fauna. Considerations of light and motion also arise here. ' (3) Climate (by comparison with the present day), as indicated by (a) organisms; (b) lithology and petrology of the rock. Deposits laid down under glacial, temperate, sub-tropical and tropical conditions, in deserts or derived from deserts, and under the effects of heavy raimfall, each bear well-marked characteristics by which they can be recognized. These characteristics may be physical, as in the formation of drei- kanter and rounded grains under desert conditions, and of striated and far-travelled rocks as a result of glacial action ; or they may be chemical, as in the differmg degree and nature of alteration of the constituent minerals of deposits formed by glacial action, under arid conditions or those of moist heat.t * Since the above was written, many papers read at a symposium on sedimentation by T. W. Vaughan, C. Schuchert, H. E. Merwin, E. W. Shaw, and others, have been published in the Bull. Amer. Geol. Scc., Vol. 31 (1920), p. 401. + See, for example, Barrell, J., ‘‘ Relations between Climate and Ter- restrial Deposits,” Journ. of Geology, Vol. 16 (1908), p. 159, and “ The Climatic Factor as illustrated in Arid America,” by Ellsworth Huntington, with a contribution by C. Schuchert on “Climates of Geological Time,” Publication 192, Carnegie Institution, Washington, 1914. B 18 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Not only do geological deposits yield evidence of ancient climates, but paleeo-meteorological indications are sometimes obtained. An iteresting case is provided by the veritable cemetery of Phocene whales, sharks, etc., which occurs on the Belgian coast and has been described by M. Van den Broeck. According to Mr. F. W. Harmer* these cetaceans and fish were drifted by the north-westerly gales prevailing in Pliocene times into land-locked bays on the eastern shores of the ancient “ North Sea,” and were unable to escape ; hence the enormous accumulation of vertebrate skeletons in the deposits there. Similarly, the extensive growth of the roots of Coal Measure trees on one side, and their relatively slight srowth towards the other in the Upper Carboniferous has been quoted as evidence of the direction of prevalent gales in those early days. | (4) Salt-, brackish- or fresh-water. At present the best evidence of these conditions is provided by the fossils them- selves, having regard to their similarity or otherwise to modern marine, estuarine or fresh-water forms. But attempts are being made to apply other lithological criteria to the deposits in order that deductions may be made in the absence of fossils. Although the ocean has become progressively more and — more salt throughout geological ages, and is assumed to have originated, presumably as a saltless hydrosphere, about 100 million years ago,t it is noteworthy that in the Devonian period there lived a pelecypod Archanodon, so markedly similar to the freshwater mussel of to-day that there is little doubt but that its habitat was fresh-water; under other conditions, Cardiola, Murchisoma, Nucula, Pleurotomaria, and other castropods, are found, bearing general characters similar to * Proc. Geol. Assoc., Vol. 17 (1902), p. 421. + For a summary of the evidence and deductions relating to this matter, see F. W. Clarke, ‘‘ Data of Geochemistry,” Bull. 695 (1920), U.S. Geol. Survey. But on the evidence of the accumulation of helium and lead in rocks bearing radio-active minerals, the Devonian is stated to have been formed about 380 million years ago. eS ce SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 19 living marine mollusca. In the Carboniferous Period which followed, deposits have been styled fresh-water or marine according to the characters of their mollusca, and it is evident that at least in these periods, if not earlier, the mollusca had adapted themselves to a fresh-water or a marine environment. (5) Paleogeographical conditions. Much light may be thrown upon the ancient geography of the period by a study of the derived fragments and minerals in rocks, and by the variation in size and proportion of the constituents. The petrological character of the adjoining land-area, its relative altitude, and the presence or absence of large trunk rivers, may often be adduced from the character of the sediments. Ancient deltas have thus been traced. Judging from the evidence obtained by the “Challenger” expedition on the formation of glauconite, the presence of that mineral in rocks is pre- sumptive evidence of oscillatory marie conditions, on the continental edge of great ocean basins where currents of different temperature or salinity mingle, and possibly near the mouths of rivers bringing little suspended matter into the ocean, but a considerable quantity of dissolved salts. The existence and direction of beneficial food-bearing or inimical mud-bearing currents may also be indicated. (6) Diastrophism. The evidence yielded by sediments of secular movements of the earth’s crust, slow or fast, was considered in some of its aspects in the earlier part of this address. The enormously-increased denudation consequent upon considerable elevation is reflected in the vast accumula- tions of the Flysch and Mollasse which fringe the Alps and represent the wreckage of a great thickness of that mighty mountain mass after the earlier stages of its uplift. On the other hand, the depression of the British area which gave rise to the great Cenomanian transgression was followed by the formation of the Chalk in a basin which subsided at least 1,000 feet during its deposition. The remarkably purity of 20 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. the Chalk, and its freedom from any quantity of terrigenous sediment can best be explained (in view of the fact that it contains shallow-water forms of life, and was bordered by land as close as N.W. Scotland and Ireland, the Harz Mountains, Scandinavia, and: a belt which separated it in part from the Hippurite-sea of Southern France, the Alps, and Central Europe) by postulating a relatively low level and condition of peneplanation of the land, and distance from large rivers bringing terrigenous sediment. Not only may gentle movements leave their mark upon the rocks, but earthquakes yield records which have of late been recognized more widely in ancient sediments than hitherto. Professor P. F. Kendall has adduced evidence of earthquake disturbances durmg the Coal Measure Period, many of the features of present-day earthquakes, such as rifts, fissures, undulations, ridges, hollows, pipes, “ sand-blows,” riding having been found.* Similarly, the marvellous accumu- lation in the Old Red Sandstone of the distorted remains of innumerable fish may be evidence of earthquake shocks, submarine or terrestrial, such as those that to-day kill off large quantities of fish, the bodies of which are found floating on the surface. The Old Red Sandstone was deposited during a period renowned for its mountain-building movements with accompanying volcanic outbursts. Sir A. Geikie has suggested and over- that mephitic vapours poured out by the volcanoes were the cause of the high death-rate and the large accumulation of fish remains. (7) The existence of other classes of organisms. Often it is possible to adduce from the strata evidence as to the conditions of food-supply, the struggle for existence, and the reasons for the survival of certain families of organisms. Thus, the supposition as to a relationship between the decline of the trilobites, and the rise of the ganoid fishes, receives strong * Proc. Geol]. Soc., No. 1031, (1919), p. 28, SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 21 support when trilobites have been found in the stomachs of fossil fishes, and we are thereby tempted to trace a causal connexion. In the matter of the broader aspects of evolution, it was suggested by J. Starkie Gardner* that the expansion, migration, - and consequent evolution of the ruminants waited upon the rise of the grasses, and only when the latter became widespread in Eocene and Oligocene times was the food-supply of these animals ensured and migration and expansion of the stock possible. Again, Professor EK. W. Berry, in a suggestive paper on “ The Evolution of the Flowering Plants and Warm-blooded Animals,” recently published,t has put forward tentative views to the effect that the rise of the birds was dependent upon the production of a food-supply in the shape of the fruits of the flowering plants, and thus followed that stage in the evolution of plants. He also suggests that the differentiation of the Eocene mammals was possible only because of the food value of such fruits, and, noting the concentration of energy in srain, points out that human development was not possible without it. In his recently-published monograph on “ The Environ- ment of Vertebrate Life in the Late Paleozoic in North America,’ = Professor I. C. Case describes the change which took place in the fauna from the long period of slow evolution in the singularly monotonous environment of the marie Pennsylvanian to the rapid evolution in the diversified environ- ment of the Permo-Carboniferous. He regards the sudden expansion as due to climatic change accompanied by physio- eraphic changes which led to an alteration in the level of the continent. He points out that in land life adapted to arid climatic phases we should expect to find a greater activity * Proc. Geol. Assoc., Vol. 9, (1885-6) p. 448. + Amer. Journ. Science, Series 4, Vol. 49, p. 207 (1920). t Carnegie Institution Publications, No. 283 (1919). 22 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. and higher development, with special adaptation to resist violent changes of temperature, etc. In his opening address to Section C (Geology) at the British Association, Cardiff, 1920, Dr. F. A. Bather quotes Professor Abel as maintaiming that the varying “tempo” of evolution in the case of the sirenians and horses of the Tertiary can be correlated with the food-supply. The sirenians under- went a steady, slow change because although they migrated from land to sea, they retained the habit of feeding on soft water-plants. Horses, though remaining on land, evolved at first rapidly, and then more slowly, but up to Phocene times always more quickly than the sirenians. Such evolution might be correlated with their change into eaters of gram, and their adaptation to a life on the plaims where food of this character was available. The whales, like the sirenians, migrated at the beginning of Tertiary time from the land to the sea. But their rate of evolution was altogether different, hence very diverse forms resulted. At first they remained near the coasts, and kept to the ancestral diet, with consequent slow change. Then they took to hunting fish, and afterwards to eating cephalopods ; from Oligocene times onward the change was thus very rapid, and a great burst in evolution in Miocene times resulted. Finally, many turned to minute floating organisms as food, and from Lower Pliocene times to the present day the change has been very slow. Dr. Bather rightly emphasizes the fact that any attempts to frame a causal connexion are bound to be speculative. Numerous cases can be quoted from the geological record of the gradual changes in a fauna resulting from a gradually- changing environment. Two parallel examples may be mentioned of the effect produced on molluscan life by a gradual elevation of the sea-bed sufficient to cut off arms of the sea and produce lakes which continued to shrink. In the first SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 23 example, the Permian inland seas, now represented by the dolomitic limestones and gypsum beds of N.E. England, show a fauna which bears affinities with that of the preceding period, the Carboniferous, but as a whole becomes impoverished in species and rarer in individuals. At the same time, distorted and dwarfed forms slowly appear—apparently as a result of the concentration of sea-salts which were eventually thrown out of solution upon the lake bottom as a result of evaporation. In another example, the isolation of the great lakes, such as Tanganyika, and others, in Africa, resulted in gradually shrinking lakes throughout the Miocene period to the present day. The institution, however, of partial mternal dramage systems into the lakes, together with tropical floods (in contra- distinction to the aridity of the Permian), has led to the gradual sweetening of the waters. The fresh-water genera of mollusca with marine affinities, such as Paramelania and others, are typical of the peculiar fauna of the lake, a fauna which, although of Mid-Tertiary age, contains forms bearing resem- blances to certain Jurassic fossils. In other instances we are able to note the dying out or migration of species with changing climate. The gradual oncoming of the Glacial Period in Western Europe was heralded by the southward migration of a flood of northern mollusca, such as Cardiuwm grenlandicum, Neptunea antiqua, Natica clausa, N. helicoides, Pecten (Chlamys) islandicus, Tellina pretenuis, and others, into the area of northern Essex, and the consequent movement of the warmth-loving mollusca south- ward out of the British area. Evolution.—Many of the organisms that occur as fossils can be grouped into series showing gradual transition from species to species and even genus to genus. Indeed, it has with truth been asserted that wherever the geological strata yield a complete record, transition or continuous development can be traced. Such transitions can be ascribed only to the 24 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. effects of environment. Several lineages (“species series ”’), which are single genetic lines, have now been carefully worked out. It cannot be said that in the present state of knowledge the evolution of lieages can be definitely correlated with chang- ing environment as indicated by the sediments contaiming them. Certain cases (e.g., the Micrasters of the Chalk* or the Ammo- nites of the Lias) show an evolution unaccompanied by any apparent change in sedimentation or, so far as we can judge, of the environment that would be reflected in the character of the sediment.t But in such cases where lineages show progressive change in their constituent forms, and the sediments containing them an apparent constancy of environmental factors, we cannot yet assume that evolution has proceeded independently of environment. Alternatively, we must face the fact that our knowledge of sediments, particularly of those characters which should be indexes of environmental change, is far from sufficient. Our obvious course is to study more intensively the conditions of sedimentation at the present day, and to apply the results of such work to the rocks of the past. In the present state of knowledge it would almost seem that on the whole the environmental caus2s leading to minor changes in development have left their record in the sediments, but that the greater changes and the evolution of lmeages cannot be correlated with known variations in lithology. * A. W. Rowe, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., Vol. 55 (1899), p. 494. 7 Mr. S. S. Buckman, in his “ Inferior Oolite Ammonites ’’ (Monogr. Pal. Soc., Supplement, p. xv. (1898), wrote: “It is a great mistake to suppose that Ammonites were influenced by the character of the deposit, though this error has been so widely taught that nearly every writer, myself included, has argued as if it were a fact. When Dorset, Somerset, and Gloucestershire are compared, it will be found that the same species lived when the deposit was argillaceous, arenaceous, or calcareous, and flourished equally well. Notably is this the case when the Middle Lias of Dorset and of Somerset are compared ; or the Lias-Oolite deposits of Dorset, Somerset, and Gloucestershire, and these again with the Continent.” t In the case of organisms such as ammonites, evolution may have taken place elsewhere, and migration have brought them into the position in which they are now found. SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 25 Much light was thrown upon the deposits of ancient times by the results of the “ Challenger”? Expedition in 1873-76, albeit the work was confined very largely to deep-sea deposits. From the geological as well as the biological, chemical, and physical standpoints, the benefits which are likely to accrue from a new “ Challenger” Expedition, such as that suggested recently by the President of the British Association for the Advancement of Science,* cannot be over-estimated. Apart from the storehouse of new facts in nature always ready to be drawn upon, we now realise more clearly than in 1872 what problems require elucidation and what fields lack exploration. Our knowledge, for example, of the terrigenous belt which fringes the continents is madequate, and seems to be relatively less than that of the depths of the oceans. Nevertheless, most of the fossiliterous strata, which it is our duty and pleasure to study, were actually deposited as ancient terrigenous belts.t We need more exact information regarding the exact conditions of sedimentation to-day, and their influence upon plant and animal life. Hven the termmology of the subject cannot be regarded as adequate or settled.t Few or no accurate and quantitative descriptions of modern sediments exist.§ It may therefore be an advantage if tentative suggestions are here put forward regarding pomts upon which a new ‘Challenger ” Expedition might throw much light, and about which our present knowledge is insufficient. A re-examination * Herdman, Professor W. A., Pres. Address, Rept. Brit. Assoc., Cardiff, 1920 (1921). + Compare for example, Professor W. W. Watts, Pres. Address, Geol. Soc., 1911, p. Ixxvi. { For example, Professor W. A. Herdman suggested in 1895 the term ‘neritic’ to include those shallow-water, detrital deposits full of organic remains, deposits which do not find a place in Murray’s “ Challenger ” scheme. § In the ‘‘ Challenger’ reports, deposits of various-sized grains are termed indiscriminately “sands”? or “muds.” The only quantitative work which seems to have been accomplished is that by Dr. Sven Oden recently on the mechanical composition of Globigerina Ooze, Radiolarian Ooze, and Red Clay collected on the expedition. See Proc. Roy. Soc., Edinburgh, Vol. 36 (1916), p. 219. Bl 26 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. of much of the geological material collected on the former expedition would doubtless yield valuable results, but there can be no question as to the advantage of collecting material more systematically and fully (so far as terrigenous deposits are concerned), and noting as far as possible the exact con- ditions of accumulation. The following suggestions are not intended to be exhaus- tive; they are rather those which occur to one interested particularly in the petrology of sediments :— GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS WHICH IT IS DESIRABLE THAT A New ‘‘ CHALLENGER ” EXPEDITION SHOULD UNDERTAKE. iy A more comprehensive and detailed scheme of classification of deposits, especially the terrigenous group. The description of all deposits, so far as possible, on a quantitative basis, i.e., by mechanical analyses, with a terminology founded on such a basis. The full determination, qualitatively and quantitatively, by modern petrological methods of the mineral constituents of sediments. Investigation of the methods of mechanical precipitation of sediments in sea-water, and the effect on size of grain or ageregate of the salinity (including lime-contents, etc.) and temperature (upon which the viscosity of the water depends). The relation of the sediment (grain-size and general chemical character) to the depth of water m which laid down; the consideration of what is the deepest water indicated by any particular type of sediment, as bearing upon the question of permanence or instability of the continents and oceans, and on the origin of certain rocks. Further investigation of the effects of chemical precipita- tion or replacement of deposits under varying conditions SEDIMENTATION, ENVIRONMENT, AND EVOLUTION. 27 of depth, i.e., under varying pressure and temperature in sea-water, and of varying content of silica, calcium, magnesium, and carbon dioxide ; and on the formation of dolomite,* colloidal silica (e.g., flint), ete. 6. Precipitation through such organic agency as that of bacteria, as suggested in the case of limestones.t (In this connexion, the present-day analogue of the Chalk cannot be regarded as globigerina ooze). — 7. The relation of the character of sediments to rising and sinking adjacent land areas from which they are derived ; the criteria in each case—mechanical, mineral, and chemical ; the effect on organisms ; the composition of the sea-water in each case. 8. Further investigation of coral-reef formation. Evidence of upheaval or submergence provided by the relief of islands and the form of the coast-line. 9. The petrological character and possible origin of the boulders on the sea-bottom—especially in the case of the various “ narrow ” seas. 10. The possibilities of deep-sea boring, by Joly’s or other apparatus, and the bearing of the evidence yielded on Recent and Tertiary geological history and climatic conditions, and on the question of the permanence of the oceans.§ *See Watts, Professor W. W.. in discussion upon Professor E. W. Skeats’s paper. Q.J.G.S., Vol. 61 (1905), p. 141. + G. H. Drew “On the Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate in the Sea by Marine Bacteria, etc.’ Publication No. 182, Carnegie Institution, Washington, 1914. t See Peach, B. N., Proc. Roy. Soc., Edinburgh, Vol. 32 (1912), p. 262. Cole, Professor G. A. T., and Crook, T., Mem. Geol. Surv., Ireland, ‘‘ Rock- Specimens dredged from the Floor of the Atlantic’ (1910). Herdman, Professor W. A., and Lomas, J., 7th, Sth, 9th, 12th Ann. Reports, Liverpool Marine Biol. Committee, 1894-5-6 and 8. Also Proc. Liv. Geol. Soc., Vol. 8 (1898), :p. 205. : § On deep-sea boring apparatus, by which it is considered that a depth of several feet might be bored in the sea-floor, see Joly, Professor J., Sci. Proc. Roy. Dublin Soc., New Series, Vol. 8 (1897), p. 509, and Vol. 14 (1914), p. 256. Also Evans, J. W., Rept. Brit. Assoc., Bournemouth, 1919 (1920), p. 179. Cc 28 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 11. Investigation of the petrology of sediments in relation to neighbouring land-masses, temperature of water, etc. Distribution of minerals from volcanic rocks. The ‘stability of minerals. 12. Determination in sediments of allothigenous (primary) and authigenous (secondary) minerals. The two generations of minerals as indicated by size. The formation of glauconite. 13. The landing of parties on such islands or places on the mainland difficult of access (e.g., the island of Rockall), and collection of specimens. 14. Considerations of the habitat and migration of organisms. The possible evidence of environment yielded by sediments. Relation to lime and other contents of sea-water (lime-secreting habit, etc.). The rocks of the earth’s crust and their organic remains present problems that may be attacked by biologists and geologists from very different points of view. Both would doubtless now agree with Huxley in his dictum that “ The primary and direct evidence in favour of evolution can be furnished only by paleontology. The geological record, so soon as it approaches completeness, must, when properly questioned, yield either an affirmative or a negative answer: if evolution has taken place, there will its mark be left; if it has not taken place, there will lie its refutation.” But in the study of sedimentation, of past environments, and of the evolution of organisms, there is more than this. Suess, in “ Das Antlitz der Erde,” has summarized the wider conception in the striking sentences which follow. “It is the organic remains, no doubt, which afford us our first and most important aid in the elucidation of the past. But the goal of investigation must still remain in the recognition of those great physical changes in comparison with which the changes in the organic world appear only as phenomena of the second order, as sumple consequences.” THE MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN BEING THE THIRTY-FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT DRAWN UP FOR THE OCEANOGRAPHY DEPARTMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL. By Proressor W. A. Herpman, C.B.E., F.R.S. The Port Erm Biological Station was transferred by the Liverpool Marine Biology Committee to the University of Liverpool on December 31st, 1919,* and from that date became the marine laboratory of the department of Oceanography. This change in responsibility and adminis- tration has, however, caused no change in the scientific work of the institution. Research workers and students are admitted on the same terms as before, and the series of Annual Reports and other publications will be issued in future by the. University in continuation of those produced by the Committee. Professor James Johnstone, who is now (from October Ist, 1920) the Head of the department of Oceanography, has asked me to draw up the present Report, as the Port Krin establishment has been under my direction during the greater part of the past year. On account of this bemg a year of transition from the old dispensation to the new, when no general investigations of special note were undertaken, and also in order to effect such economy as is possible in printing, | have decided to report merely upon the usual statistics of the Biological Station, along with short summaries of some of the researches carried on by those working in the laboratory. *See last Annual Report, p. 3. 30 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. The increase in number both of those working at the Biological Station, and of those visiting the Aquarium, is remarkable. Last year (1919) we had 60 laboratory workers and over 23,000 visitors; this year, there were about 100 researchers and senior students, and nearly 36,000 visitors to the Aquarium. From Liverpool University we had Professors Dakin, Johnstone, Ramsden, Harvey-Gibson, and Herdman, Mrs. Bisbee, Mr. Burfield, Miss Knight, Miss Fry, and others ; from Oxford, Professor B. Moore, Mr. E. Whitley, and their assistants ; from Birmingham, Professor Gamble and students ; from Manchester, Dr. and Mrs. Tattersall and students ; from Reading, Professor Cole, Miss Eales, and a party of students; from Aberystwyth, Mr. Douglas Laurie and students; from Nottingham, Miss Bexon and _ students ; Professor Stephenson from Lahore; and from Cambridge, Mr. H. H. Thomas, and a party of senior students from Newnham College. . , The work of the staff at the Biological Station has been carried on as usual, and large collections of the plankton in the bay have been made throughout the year. As on previous occasions the statistics as to the use made - of the institution throughout the year will be given in the form of a “ Curator’s Report ”’ (see below). It may be useful to those proposing to work at the Biological Station that the ground plan of the buildings, showing the laboratory and other accommodation, should be inserted in this Report as on previous occasions (see p. 31). CuRATOR’S REPORT. Mr. Chadwick reports to me as follows on the various departments of the work at the Station during 1920 :— “ Ninety-six workers occupied our laboratories during the past year, the majority being undereraduates from the departments of Zoology and Botany of the University of wane < ol ERIN. AT PORT E BIOLOGICAL STATION MARi ayn 9 1) s an BULL syuns burly2])D} OQ} “ojoina Dep mIvpe poids AYSHILVH ‘Woalyvnov a yuUos aj7212U07D S=y rz m% 02 O/ 4227 ‘urd oy jo opis puvy yysia oy uo Arroyo ey 94 JOAO SI AlystUTEyH-o1g jo AiojVIOGrT MOU oY], ‘sAoOH YIOq uo Sarm YoIvesey SUIMOYS ‘UOIYLIG [eOLsO[OIg UL yOg ey} Jo urd $uood|| y10M bia © ) AYO.LVHOSV7 ttl R4ADLQIUT 1 =) Ceneral work room ( strereom pent a7 Sorting table Sorting lable Sorting table mecall genic Sortinglable yun] AT 400/f sacii 0) sdI}g fiojo1090 T YI4LD>83RF Jo L00)f 4addy 32 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Liverpool. The Universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Birming- ham and Manchester, and the University Colleges of Reading, Nottingham and Aberystwyth, were also represented by researchers and students. | “Miss Knight, of the department of Botany of the University of Liverpool, devoted the whole of July and September to research upon the life-histories of certain marine alge. Professor B. Moore, with his son Mr. T. Moore, Mr. E. Whitley and Mr. T. A. Webster as coadjutors, continued his research into the seasonal variation in the alkalinity of sea-water, and was followed in the same line of research im August by Mr. E. N. Allott, of the department of Chemistry, University of Oxford. During the Easter vacation, Professor Harvey-Gibson, assisted by Miss Knight, was engaged in preparing drawings to show the diagnostic characters of the species of Algee, for his forthcommg book on the subject. In April, and again in September, Mrs. Bisbee devoted herself to the physiology of Echimoderms, with special reference to the direction of the currents in the madreporites of starfishes and sea-urchins. Durimg the Kaster vacation, Miss C. Mayne continued her work on the animal ecology of Port Hrin Bay, - and Mr. G. I’. Sleggs devoted some time to further work upon the common barnacle, Balanus balanoides. “In addition to Professor Herdman’s special plankton investigations carried on between March and September, the ordinary official bi-weekly tow-nettings were taken by the Assistant Curator throughout the year, with only very occasional interruptions due to unfavourable weather. General faunistic work was carried on vigorously by all our biologist workers, and amongst the large number of species collected were some exceptionally large specimens of Lucernaria sp., not previously recorded from Manx waters. These were found by Professor Dakin and others on the boulder-strewn beach of Bay-ny-Carrickey. MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 30 “Miss Catherine Herdman, during both the Easter and the Summer vacations, continued her investigation into the occurrence and the changes in the Amphidiniums and other Peridiniales in the sand of Port Erin beach, and succeeded in discovering several new forms, which were exhibited alive at the Cardiff meeting of the British Association. Inst of Workers, 1920. February 9th and 10th. Mr. E. A. Lewis. Miss M. Knight. During the Easter vacation (March and Aprii). Miss M. Knight. Professor Herdman. Miss E. C. Herdman. Professor J. Johnstone. Professor Stephenson. Professor R. J. Harvey-Gibson. Miss P. Fry. Mr. H. Hamshaw Thomas. Professor B. Moore. Mr. T. Moore. Mr. E. Whitley. Mr. T. A. Webster. Miss D. Bexon. Miss I. Bayliss. Miss B. Cockshott. Mr. H. A. Storey. Miss G. Clegg. Miss H. Good. Miss Horrobin. Professor W. J. Dakin. Miss L. Thorpe. Miss E. L. Gleave. Mrs. Bisbee. Miss M. E. Roper. Miss M. A. Pocock. Miss I. M. Allen. Miss R. Hilton. Mr. G. F. Sleggs. Miss C. Mayne. Miss M. Hobbins. Professor Ramsden. Professor F. J. Cole. Miss N. B. Eales. Miss D. R. Crofts Miss E. Trewavas. Miss N. F. Soyer. Mr. A. 8. Wright. Professor Gamble. Miss N. E. Boycott. Miss O. M. Parsons. Mr. J. G. H. Frew. Mr. R. Douglas Laurie. Mr. J. R. W. Jenkins. Mr. E. E. Watkin. Mr. R. A. Little. Mr. W. M. Speight. Mr. Burfield. Miss N. Carter. Miss G. F. Selwood. Dr. W. M. Tattersall. Mrs. Tattersall. Mr. F. Neave. Miss M. Bowen. Miss M. A. Wilson. Miss O. V. Jones. Miss E. Lewis. Miss G. E. Jeffcote. Miss E. M. E. Gardner. Miss D. Hanson. Miss Hughes Miss A. E. Chesters. Miss Staidler. Miss M. Simpson. Miss D. Allen. Miss K. M. Stoddart. Miss Tregoning Miss D. Hookins. Miss M. Baggs. Miss Clayton. Miss Roper. Miss M. A. Pike. Miss M. Critchley. Miss M. Murray. Miss J. Graham. Miss Hall. Miss O. Bangham. Miss Ashford. Miss W. Kehoe. Miss B. Atherton. Miss J. J. Anderton. Miss D. Stephenson. Miss B. M. Illingworth. Miss E. Angel. Miss K. M. Huyton. Miss H. V. Davies. Miss D. M. Dawson. Miss N. Dawson. Miss M. Knowles. Miss D. Bell. Miss A. Butterfield. 34 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. During the Summer vacation (July Mr. W. Birtwistle. to September). Miss I. M. G. Butler. Miss M. Knight. Mrs. Bisbee. Miss A. Bishop. Miss D. Hanson. Professor Herdman. A Miss E. C. Herdman. October 29th to November \st. Mr. E. N. Allott. Miss M. Knight. The Fish Hatchery. “The stock of plaice collected for spawning purposes during the autumn of 1919 consisted of 124 survivors of the previous year’s stock—82 brought from Luce Bay by the fishery steamer ‘ James Fletcher, and 110 caught off Niarbyl and purchased from local fishermen, making a total of 316 fish. Of this number 27 are known to have died before the end of the year, so that the hatching season of 1920 opened with 289 fish. “The season began on February 9th—an unusually early date—when 15,750 eggs were placed in the hatching boxes. A few of the fish must have begun spawning three weeks earlier than this, for amongst the first lot of eggs skimmed from the ponds a few newly-hatched larve were found. The number of eggs skimmed on one day did not exceed 100,000 until March 10th, and the largest daily numbers . —378,000 and 399,000—were recorded on the 17th and 22nd respectively. Upwards of 200,000 were recorded on March 13th, 19th, 20th, 23rd, 24th, and 30th. The total number of eggs collected is 4,756,800, and of larvee set free 4,010,000. Both these totals represent a substantial advance upon the results of the previous year, and justify confidence that with more settled conditions a much larger output of larval fish in the near future may be expected. “The Hatchery Record, giving the number of eggs collected and of larvee set free on various days, is as follows :— Larve Eggs collected. Date. set free. Date. 25,200 ... Feb. 9 to 12 223,050... Hlebrize 25,200- 2) ~e 4d to. 18 18,900 .., March 8 MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 3D Larvae Eggs collected. Date. set free. Date. 109,250 ... Feb. 21 to March 1 91,400 ... March 19 518,700 ... March 3 to 10 428,400 cag 96,600 eit 71,400 30 231,000 Bo nity 173,300 ... April 1 153,300 tlle 387,450 sal 3 378,000 ONE 228,900 Sanat 252,000 sag 484,050 hee: 672,000 » 20 and 22 506,100 geal 483,000 23 and 24 200,550 Ase 258,300 > 25 to 27 567,000 erat: 688,800 ... ,, 29to April5 334,950 = 128 389,800 ... April 6 to 9 296,100 » 26 346,500 , 10 and 12 122,850 are 69,300 , 17 and 19 43,050 ... May 4 38,850 » 21 and 23 24,150 it da 8 21,000 » 27 to May 6 9,400 canal 4,756,800 4,010,000 Lobster Culture. “ Fifteen berried lobsters—the same number as last year— were purchased from the local fishermen. The yield of larve was, however, much greater this year than last, for while in 1919 the total number was only 9,702, or nearly 647 per lobster, this year the total was 28,720, or a fraction over 1,914 per lobster. the disposal of the Assistant Curator rendered necessary the The inadequate number of rearing jars at hberation of a large proportion of the larve in their first and second stages, 27,600 being dealt with in this way. LHleven hundred and twenty were placed in the rearing jars, and of this number 278, or about 1 in 4, were successfully reared and set free as lobsterlings. The Aquarvum. “The Aquarium attracted 35,730 visitors durmg the season, a number far larger than that of any previous year. A new edition of the Guide to the Aquarium was first offered 51 36 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. for sale on July 19th, and though, owing to the greatly increased. cost of printing, it was found necessary to raise the price from threepence to sixpence, 843 copies were sold. The display of local fishes was more representative than it has been since pre-war days. Plaice hatched in three consecutive years, and larval lobsters in various stages of development, were exhibited, and attracted much attention. (Signed) H. C. CHADWICK.” REPORT OF THE EDWARD FoRBES HE. XHIBITIONER. An “ Edward Forbes Exhibition ” was founded* in 1915, at the University of Liverpool, in commemoration of the pioneer marine biological work done in this district by the celebrated Manx naturalist, who was born about a hundred years ago. The object of the Exhibition is to enable some postgraduate student of the University to proceed to the Port Erin Biological Station for the purpose of carrying on some piece of biological research, more or less in continuation of the line of work opened up by Forbes, or an investigation which has grown out of such work. The Edward Forbes Exhibitioner for the year 1920 is Miss Laura Thorpe, B.Sc., who spent several weeks during the Easter vacation in an investigation of the food-contents of the alimentary canal of various common molluscs and other invertebrates of the seashore. Unfortunately, Miss Thorpe sprained her ankle on a collecting expedition at Poolvaash early in the time, and was laid up for some days and unable to make any further observations on the beach, although when able to work she was kept supplied with fresh material by the other Liverpool students. Miss Thorpe has submitted a detailed report upon all the species she was able to examine, but as she proposes to continue her interrupted work during *The Regulations in regard to the Exhibition will be found at p. 52. MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 37 next Haster vacation, we have agreed to postpone a fuller report to a future occasion, and merely to record now that she found :— Purpura lapillus feeding almost wholly on the rock- barnacles (Balanus), the appendages of which were found in abundance in the alimentary canal of the mollusc. Patella vulgata feeding on the smaller algze, as remains of red, green, and brown sea-weeds (such as Polysiphoma, Ptilota, Rhodochorton, and Conferve) were identified, along with the silicious cases of diatoms, such as Coscinodiscus and Hucampia, and some sponge spicules both silicious and calcareous. Inttorina littorea feeding at that time on green alge. Trochus zizyphinus feeding on the alge Polysiphona and Ectocarpus, along with remains of diatoms, the Hydroid Obelia and sponge spicules. OTHER RESEARCH WORK AT PORT ERIN. LARVAL FisH AND PLANKTON Foon. It was pointed out recently by Dr. Johan Hjort that as the young fish larvee hatched in the sea in spring are dependent for food, after they have used up the supply of yolk derived from the egg, upon the diatoms and other minute organisms of the phyto-plankton, which also make their appearance in the sea in spring, it is most important that the young fish should not be hatched before the diatoms have become abundant. The phyto-plankton varies to some extent as to its abundance and date of appearance from year to year, the maximum ranging from March to May, and it is possible that in a late year, unless the first larvee are correspondingly late, the fish may be hatched out in quantity before their natural food is present in sufficient abundance, and there may be an enormous mortality of larvee which will affect the young fish population of that year, and ereatly reduce the numbers in the commercial fisheries for some years. 38 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. We have data for many years (from 1907) in regard to the phyto-plankton in the sea off Port Erin, but it is not easy to determine exactly when, in the open sea, the pelagic fish-eggs have hatched out in quantity. We have, however, at the Port Erin hatchery, the records, extending back to 1904, of the numbers of eggs obtained from the spawning plaice in our pond, the dates of hatching and the temperature of pond and sea taken twice daily—and it is probable that these larve, although hatched under a roof, afford some clue to what is going on in the sea at the time. The whole matter is discussed more fully in the Lancashire Sea-Fisheries Laboratory Report for 1919, pp. 82-88, but as the enquiry was carried on at Port Erin it requires this brief mention in the Annual Report, and I wish to place on record that Miss Maisie Hobbins, B.Sc., while working at the Biological Station im April, gave me great assistance in abstracting and comparing the records of phyto-plankton and of hatching, of temperatures of pond and sea, and of dates of spawning and temperature of water. The plaice spawning in our pond at Port Erin was unusually early in 1920, some fertilised eggs being produced in January, and the temperature records show that the average for the preceding winter months was high compared with recent years. The mild winter seems to be accompanied by early spawning of the plaice. There were, however, fewer hours of sunshine than the average recorded for the spring months, and this may have affected the photo-synthesis and reproduc- tion of the phyto-plankton as the diatoms were late in appearing in any quantity. It is possible, then, that the early-hatched larvee found insufficient food in the sea and that the “ year class ” of such fish for 1920 may not be largely represented in the commercial fisheries of the future. A careful comparison of our data for the thirteen years (1907-19) shows that in nine cases (1907, 1910-12, and 1915-19) the phyto-plankton in the sea preceded the hatching of the MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 39 plaice larve, and that it was only in the remaining four years (1908, 1909, 1913, and 1914) that there was apparently some risk of the larve finding no suitable food, or very little, in the sea. The evidence so far seems to show that if the fish larvee from the hatchery are set free in the sea as late as March 20th they are fairly sure of finding suitable food; but if they are hatched as early as February they may run some chance of being starved. This investigation is only started, but seems promising. It should be repeated and extended in other localities and in future years, and a comparison should be made, if possible, between the results obtained in the laboratory and the statistics for‘commercial fisheries when these are given in sufficient detail and completeness. PHOTO-SYNTHESIS AND NITROGEN FIXATION. Professor Benjamin Moore, F.R.S., with Mr. E. Whitley and Mr. Webster, have continued their very interesting and fundamental investigations on photo-synthesis, including an enquiry into the sources of the carbon and nitrogen compounds formed in the growing green marine plant. Their results have been communicated to the Royal Society and will be published in due course, but Professor Moore and Mr. Whitley propose to continue this lme of investigation further at Port Hrin next year. MICRO-FAUNA OF THE BEACH. Miss HK. C. Herdman (Newnham College, Cambridge) devoted many weeks, in spring and summer, to a detailed examination of the micro-fauna and flora of the sand on Port Erin beach. Beginning with the so-called “ Amphidinium operculatum,”’ the occurrence of which in brown patches on the sand between tide-marks has been recorded in previous reports, she extended her investigation to other species of 40 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Dinoflagellates and some diatoms, and was able to supplement and correct the views of previous observers. She found that the organisms in question were more abundant at spring tides than during neaps, that the different organisms remained in their own patches and that there was no alternation between Dinoflagellates and diatoms such as had been described. By having successive samples of sand sent from Port Hrin, she was able to exhibit the several forms of Amphidinium alive under the microscope at the Cardiff meeting of the British Association, and, after consultation with Professor Kofoid from California, who is preparmeg a monograph on the group, it was found that the various shapes which had been supposed to be merely varieties of Amphidinium operculatum are really at least three distinct species which are being described by Professor Kofoid as A. herdman, A. asymmetricum and A. sulcatum, and are all new to our British records. There are also one or more species of Gymnodinium, a Polykrikos, and a few unidentified colourless, naked Dinoflagellates ; but as Miss Herdman is laying before the Liverpool Biological Society a separate paper on her investigation, with figures of the organisms observed, which will follow this report in the - volume of Transactions, it is unnecessary to give further details here. ALGOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION. Miss Margery Knight, M.Sc., who has made many visits to Port Erin during the past year, and has devoted all available time to a detailed study of the habits and life-history of the common brown sea-weed Pylaella littoralis, has furnished me with the following short summary of the results of her work :— “ Pylaiella littoralis is found in abundance, either as an epiphyte on Ascophyllum nodosum, Fucus vesiculosus, Fucus serratus, or growing independently on smooth rocks or stones in the pools at or below lhalf-tide level. The plant shows MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 4] two clearly differentiated forms of reproductive cells, viz. : (a2) motile gonidia (asexual), and (6) motile gametes (sexual). Observations on Pylaella during the spring and summer months have revealed a periodicity or rhythmic alternation of these reproductive cells, comparable with that found by Professor Lloyd Willams in Dictyota dichotoma. “There is also a very definite cycle of development of Pylaella plants on the three ‘ hosts.’ At the time when the first gametangial stage has been reached by the Pylaiella growing on Ascophyllum nodosum, the young plants are just making their first appearance on the now rapidly-growing plants of Fucus vesiculosus. At a later period one can detect the embryo plants of Pylaiella on Fucus serratus. The cycle is then completed by the development of young plants on the new shoots of Ascophyllum, whose maturer parts bear the now battered and decrepit older generation of Pylavella. “It is proposed to continue the research along these lines :— (a) Systematic observation of the behaviour of Pylaella during the winter. (b) Investigation of the cytological changes underlying the alternation of sexual and asexual reproductive cells. (c) The relation of the epiphyte to the ‘ host’ plant.” PLANKTON INVESTIGATION. In the course of the plankton work, which is carried out continuously at Port Erin, there has been this year one special investigation which may be briefly described. It has been much discussed in the past whether the plankton is so regularly distributed that two hauls of the same net, taken at the same place and, as nearly as possible, simultaneously, will give 492 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. almost identical results. With a view of testing the matter further, on seven separate occasions, in April, May, August, and September, when the conditions at sea seemed favourable, I took from the motor-boat “ Redwing ” a series of four or six hauls of the vertical Nansen net im rapid succession, from depths of 8 to 20 fathoms up to the surface. Superficially, at the time of emptying the catches from the net into their bottles those of each series seemed very much alike, and even when measured carefully in the laboratory some of the series gave identical quantitative results—for example, six successive hauls from 8 fathoms were all of them 0.2 c.c., and four out of five from 20 fathoms were 0.6 c.c.; but qualitatively the volume was made up rather differently in the successive hauls of a series. The same organisms were present for the most part in all the hauls of each series, and allowing for the well- known seasonal variations the chief groups of organisms are present in much the same proportions. For example, in a series where the Copepoda average about 100, the Dinoflagel- lates average about 300 and the Diatoms about 8,000, but the percentage deviation of individual hauls from the average may be as much as plus or minus 50, or even occasionally — a good deal more. The estimated numbers of each organism (about fifty species) in each of the thirty-four hauls have been worked out, and the details will be published in the Sea-Fisheries Report for 1920; but, pending further statistical treatment, the impression one receives from looking at the figures is that if on each occasion one haul only in place of four or six had been taken, and if one had used that haul to estimate the abundance of any one organism in that sea-area, one might have been about 50 per cent. wrong in either direction—while the probable error of the method allows of a range of only from about 10 to 15 per cent. ‘This seems to indicate a greater variation in the successive hauls than can be accounted for by the probable error of the experiment. MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 43 HVALUATION OF THE SEA. This Biological Station was started by a body of men who were engaged in faunistic work—that is, in collecting and identifymg various groups of marine animals, and such work is always necessary in exploring a new district, and moreover, it is never finished but must always go on to some extent, even when accompanied by more difficult experimental research. Every year we keep adding something to the published records of our fauna and flora. With the long list of additions made in our last Annual Report (the accumula- tions of some years) we brought the total number of species for our Liverpool district up to about 2,500. But it is quite possible that some common but minute species have been overlooked ; in the present report several new kinds of Dino- flagellates have been recorded, and last summer we added a large species of Lucernaria, which had not been previously noticed in the Irish Sea. But in addition to such faunistic and ecological work, the study of the conditions under which the animals live, we have advanced in our research work at the Biological Station into comparative anatomy and morphology, into embryology and life-histories, and into physiology and_ bio- chemistry. And now, in my final words, I wish to direct attention to an extension of faunistic work which will, I believe, become an important investigation at marine biological stations, and is eminently suitable for team-work where a number of zoologists and botanists are gathered together in co-operation. It is the collection of material for a rough census or approxima- tion to the numbers of different kinds of common animals and plants found in a particular area, and their rate of growth and reproduction, the study of the environment of each kind, and the attempt to determine the conditions which limit their distribution or affect their abundance. This is really no new 44 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. study, but it requires to be systematised and extended. We have made some small contributions to portions of it in the past in our own reports, and work of a similar nature is seen in the Clare Island Survey, article “ Marine Heology ” by R. Southern (1915), in Sumner’s “ Intensive Study of the Fauna,” etc., in Bulletin of the Bureau of Fisheries for 1908, in Orton’s “‘ Contribution to an Evaluation of the Sea,” etc. (M.B.A. Journal, 1914), and in my “Spolia Runiana IV ” (Linnean Journal, 1920). But the earliest, most important and most complete investigation is that of Dr. C. G. Joh. Petersen and his assistants in the Reports of the Danish Biological Station for some years back, and especially the Report for 1918. He uses a bottom-sampler, or grab, which can be lowered down open and then closed on the bottom so as to bring up a sample square foot or square metre (or in deep water one-tenth of a square metre) of the sand or mud and its inhabitants. With this apparatus, modified in size and weight for different depths and bottoms, Petersen and his fellow-workers have made a very thorough examination of the Danish waters, and have arrived at certain numerical results as to the quantity of animals in the Kattegat expressed in tons, and have shown the dependence of all these animals, directly or indirectly, upon the great beds of Zostera in the Kattegat. Such estimates are obviously of great biological interest and, even if only rough approximations, are a valuable contribution to our understanding of the metabolism of the sea, and of the possibility of increasing the yield of local fisheries. It seems probable that the estimates of relative and absolute abundance of such organisms may be very different in different seas under different conditions. The work will have to be done in each great area, such as the North Sea, the English Channel, and the Irish Sea, independently. This is a necessary investigation, both biological and physical, which lies before the oceanographers of the future, upon the results of which MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 45 the preservation and further cultivation of some sea-fisheries may depend. Our own contributions to the subject in the Irish Sea so far deal only with a few of the shore and shallow-water animals, and Miss Catherine Mayne, B.Sc., in several visits to Port Erm has given me much assistance in counting and measuring and weighing the more abundant animals and plants, and in preparing a series of diagrams showing the areas occupied by selected species on a typical square foot on different parts of the shore. Some of these data were made use of in a paper printed this year by the Linnean Society (“Spolia Runiana IV ”’), from which I may take as examples the following three very abundant animals, all free-swimming when young but fixed in the adult condition, and all of value as food of marketable fishes :-— (1) The gregarious polychaet worm Sabellaria alveolata, which builds masses of sandy tubes on the rocks at Hilbre Island and elsewhere, and where 40 square yards may contain over a million worms (See fig. 1, p. 51). (2) The common rock-barnacle Balanus balanoides, from the base of Bradda Head at Port Erin, where there may be about 3,000 barnacles on a square foot of rock (Fig. 2, p. 53). (3) The edible mussel Mytilus edulis, the most abundant and most generally useful mollusc in our seas. The rocks at Hilbre Island and elsewhere may be covered with a layer of young mussels which are so closely placed as to be absolutely continuous, while Professor Johnstone has calculated that a mussel-bed in Morecambe Bay may have 16,000 young mussels to the square foot, and may produce per unit of area nearly a hundred times the amount of flesh for food that is produced by cultivated land (Fig. 3, p. 56). My object in referring to these still mcomplete investi- gations is to direct the attention of our students and local naturalists to what seems a natural and useful extension of 46 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. faunistic work, for the purpose of obtaining some approximation to a quantitative estimate of the more important animals of our shores and shallow water, and their relative values as either the immediate or the ultimate food of marketable fishes. **'L.M.B.C. Memotrs.”’ Although the Liverpool Marine Biology Committee has now been dissolved, it is thought well to retain the former title for this series of publications. They have become well- known in laboratories and are referred to in literature as the “ L.M.B.C. Memoirs,” and it would only lead to confusion to change the title, although they are no longer published by a Committee but by the Oceanography department of the University. Since our last report was published, no further Memoirs have been issued to the public. H1mantuatta, by Miss L. G. Nash, M.Sc., is ready to prmt; Miss HE. L. Gleave, M.Sc., has nearly completed her Memoir on Doris, the Sea-lemon ; Mr. Burfield, is writing the Memoir on Sacirra; Mrs. Bisbee has made further progress with TupuLariaA, and still other Memoirs are in preparation. The following shows a list of the Memoirs already published or arranged for: I. Ascrp1a, W. A. Herdman, 60 pp., 5 Pls. II. Carpium, J. Johnstone, 92 pp., 7 Pls. III. Ecuinus, H. C. Chadwick, 36 pp., 5 Pls. IV. Copium, R. J. H. Gibson and H. Auld, 3 Pls. V. Aucyonium, 8S. J. Hickson, 30 pp., 3 Pls. VI. LEPEOPHTHEIRUS AND LERN@A, A. Scott, 5 Pls. VII. Lingus, R. C. Punnett, 40 pp., 4 Pls. VIII. Puatce, F. J. Cole and J. Johnstone, 11 Pls. IX. Cuonpruvs, O. V. Darbishire, 50 pp., 7 Pls. X. Patetua, J. R. A. Davis and H. J. Fleure, 4 Pls. XI. Anenicoia, J. H. Ashworth, 126 pp., 8 Pls. XII. Gammarus, M. Cussans, 55 pp., 4 Pls. XIII. Anuripa, A. D. Imms, 107 pp., 8 Pls. XIV. Licata, C. G. Hewitt, 45 pp., 4 Pls. XV. AntEepon, H. C. Chadwick, 55 pp., 7 Pls. XVI. Cancer, J. Pearson,.217 pp., 13 Pls. XVII. Pecren, W. J. Dakin, 144 pp., 9 Pls. MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 47 XVIII. Exepong, A. Isgrove, 113 pp., 10 Pls. XIX. Potycuaret Larva, F. H. Gravely, 87 pp., 4 Pls. XX. Buccinum, W. J. Dakin, 123 pp., 8 Pls. XXI. Eupacurus, H. G. Jackson, 88 pp., 6 Pls. XXII. Ecutngperm Larv#, H. C. Chadwick, 40 pp., 9 Pls. Sail, Topunx, G.C. Dixon, 100,pp.,.7 Pls. HimanTuattia, L. G. Nash. Doris, E. L. Gleave. TuBULARIA, R. C. Bisbee. AptysiA, N. B. Eales. TEREBELLA, C. P. M. Stafford. Bauanus, G. F. Sleggs. SaciTta, S. T. Burfield. ActiniA, J. A. Clubb. ZOSTERA, R. Robbins. HALICHONDRIA AND Sycon, A. Dendy. OystER, W. A. Herdman and J. T. Jenkins. SABELLARIA, A. T. Watson. OstTRACOD (CyTHERE), A. Scott. ASTERIAS, H. C. Chadwick. Botry.Luoipes, W. A. Herdman. NEMATODE, T. Southwell. As the result of a slight fire in the Zoology Department of the University, a portion of the stock of L.M.B.C. Memoirs has been partially destroyed. There are a certain number of damaged copies of some of the Memoirs which are stained or singed externally, but are still quite usable, and are suitable for laboratory work. It has been decided to offer these at prices ranging according to the condition from one- half to one-fourth of the published prices, as follows :— Memoir I., Ascidia, 6d. to 9d.; VI., Lepeophtheirus and Lernza, 6d. to 1s.; VII., Lineus, 6d. to 1s.; XIII., Anurida, Is. to 2s. ; XIV., Ligia, 6d. to 1s.; XV., Antedon, 6d. to 1s. 3d. Memoirs should be ordered from the University Press, Liverpool. Appended to this Report are :— (A) The Laboratory Regulations—with Memoranda for the use of students, and the Regulations in regard to the “Edward Forbes Exhibition” at the University of Liverpool ; (B) The Financial Statement, List of Subscribers, and Balance Sheet for the year. 48 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. . APPENDIX A LIVERPOOL MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. GENERAL REGULATIONS. I.—This Biological Station is under the control of the Oceanography department of the University of Liverpool, and the Director of the Laboratory is the Professor of Oceanography. IJ.—In the absence of the Director, the Station is under the temporary control of the Resident Curator (Mr. H. C. Chadwick), who will keep the keys, and will decide, in the event of any difficulty, which places are to be occupied by workers, and how the tanks, boats, collecting apparatus, etc., are to be employed. II1.—The Resident Curator will be ready at all reasonable hours and within reasonable limits to give assistance to workers at the Station, and to do his best to supply them with material for their investigations. IV.—Visitors will be admitted, on payment of a small specified charge, at fixed hours, to see the Aquarium and Museum adjoining the Station. Occasional public lectures are given in the Institution by members of the staff. V.—Those who are entitled to work in the Station, when there is room, and after formal application to the Director, are :—(1) Annual Subscribers of one guinea or upwards to the funds (each guinea subscribed entitling to the use of a work place for three weeks), and (2) others who are not annual subscribers, but who pay the Treasurer 10s. per week for the accommodation and privileges. Institutions, such as Univer- sities and Museums, may become subscribers in order that a work place may be at the disposal of their students or staff for a MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. 49 certain period annually ; a subscription of two guineas will secure a work place for six weeks in the year, a subscription of five guineas for four months, and a subscription of £10 for the whole year. VI.—EHach worker is entitled to a work place opposite a window in the Laboratory, and may make use of the micro- scopes and other apparatus, and of the boats, dredges, tow-nets, -&c., so far as is compatible with the claims of other workers, and with the routine work of the Station. VII.—Each worker will be allowed to use one pint of methylated spirit per week free. Any further amount required must be paid for. All dishes, jars, bottles, tubes, and other glass may be used freely, but must not be taken away from the Laboratory. Workers desirous of making, preserving, or taking away collections of marine animals and plants, can make special arrangements -with the Director in regard to bottles and preservatives. Although workers in the Station are free to make their own collections at Port Erin, it must be clearly understood that (as in other Biological Stations) no specimens must be taken for such purposes from the Laboratory stock, nor from the Aquarium tanks, nor from the steam-boat dredging expeditions, as these specimens are the property of the Institution. The specimens in the Laboratory stock are pre- served for sale, the animals in the tanks are for the instruction of visitors to the Aquarium, and as all the expenses of steam- boat dredging expeditions are defrayed from the funds, the specimens obtained on these occasions must be retained (a) for the use of the specialists working at the Fauna of Liverpool Bay, (b) to replenish the tanks, and (c) to add to the stock of duplicate animals for sale from the Laboratory. VIII.—Kach worker at the Station is expected to prepare a short report upon his work—not necessarily for publication— to be forwarded to the Director before the end of the year for notice, if desirable, in the Annual Report. 50 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. IX.—AlIl subscriptions, payments, and other communica- tions relating to finance, should be sent to the Accountant, the University of Liverpool. Applications for permission to work at the Station, or for specimens, or any communications in regard to the scientific work should be made to the Director, Department of Oceanography, University, Liverpool. MEMORANDA FOR STUDENTS AND OTHERS WORKING AT THE Port ERIN BIoLoGIcAL STATION. Post-graduate students and others carrying on research will be accommodated in the small work-rooms of the ground floor laboratory and in those on the upper floor of the new research wing. Some of these little rooms have space for two persons who are working together, but researchers who require more space for apparatus or experiments will, so far as the accommodation allows, be given rooms to themselves. Undergraduate students working as members of a class will occupy the large laboratory on the upper floor or the front museum gallery, and it is very desirable that these students should keep to regular hours of work. As a rule, it is not expected that they should devote the whole of each day to work in the laboratory, but should rather, when tides are suitable, spend a portion at least of either forenoon or afternoon on the sea-shore collecting and observing. Occasional collecting expeditions are arranged under guidance either on the sea-shore or out at sea, and all under- graduate workers should make a point of taking part in these. It is desirable that students should also occasionally take plankton gatherings in the bay for examination in the living state, and boats are provided for this purpose at the expense of the Biological Station to a reasonable extent. Students desiring to obtain a boat for such a purpose must apply to the Curator at the Laboratory for a boat voucher. Boats for pleasure trips are not supplied by the Biological Station, but must be provided by those who desire them at their own expense. MARINE BLOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN 51 Students requiring any apparatus, glass-ware or chemicals from the store-room must apply to the Curator. Although a few microscopes are kept at the Biological Station, these are mainly required for the use of the staff or for general demonstration purposes. Students are therefore strongly advised, especially during University vacations, not to rely upon being able to obtain a suitable microscope, but ought if possible to bring their own instruments. Students are advised to provide themselves upon arrival with the “ Guide to the Aquarium ” (price 6d.), and should each also buy a copy of the set of Local Maps (price 2d.) upon which to insert their faunistic records and other notes. Occasional evening meetings in the Biological Station for lecture and demonstration purposes will be arranged from time to time. Apart from these, it is generally not advisable that students should come back to work in the laboratory in the evening ; and in all cases all lights will be put out and doors locked at 10 p.m. When the institution is closed, the key can be obtained, by those who have a valid reason for entering the building, only on personal application to Mr. Chadwick, the Curator, at 3, Rowany Terrace. Fie. 1. Sabellaria alveolata, from Hilbre Island, Nat. size. 52 - PRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. REGULATIONS OF THE EDWARD FORBES EXHIBITION. [Extracted from the Calendar of the University of Liverpool for the Session 1920-21, p. 427.] ‘EDWARD ForBES EXHIBITION. “‘ Founded in the year 1915 by Professor W. A. Herdman, D.Sc., F.R.S., to commemorate the late Edward Forbes, the eminent Manx Naturalist (1815-1854), Professor of Natural History in the University of Edinburgh, and a pioneer in Oceanographical research. The Regulations are as follows :-— (1) The interest of the capital, £100, shall be applied to establish an Exhibition which shall be awarded annually. (2) The Exhibitioner shall be a post-graduate student — of the University of Liverpool, or, in default of such, a post-graduate student of another University, qualified and willing to carry on researches in the Manx seas at the Liverpool Marine Biological Station at Port Erin, in continuation of the Marine Biological work in which Edward Forbes was a pioneer. (3) Candidates must apply in writing to the Registrar, on or before 1st February. , (4) Nomination to the Exhibition shall be made by the Faculty of Science on the recommendation of the Professor of Zoology. (5) The plan of work proposed by the Exhibitioner shall be subject to the approval of the Professor of Zoology. ‘ MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. | 53 (6) Should no award be made in any year, the income shall be either added to the capital of the fund, or shall be applied in such a way as the Council, on the recommendation of the Faculty of Science, may determine. (7) The Council shall have power to amend the foregoing Regulations, with the consent of the donor, during his life- time, and afterwards absolutely; provided, however, that the name of Edward Forbes shall always be associated with the Exhibition, and that the capital and interest of the fund shall always be used to promote the study of Marine Biology.” EDWARD ForBEs EXHIBITIONERS. 1915 Ruth C. Bamber, M.Sc. 1916 K. L. Gleave, M.Sc. 1917 C. M. P. Stafford, B.Sc. 1918 Catherine Mayne, B.Sc. 1919 George Frederick Sleggs, B.Sc. 1920 Laura Thorpe, B.Sc. ° Fic, 2. Balanus balanoides, on rocks at Port Erin. Nat. size. 54 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. APPENDIX B. FINANCIAL STATEMENT. On December 31st, 1919, the Honorary Treasurer of the Liverpool Marine Biology Committee handed over the accounts of the Port Erin Biological Station to the Accountant of the University of Liverpool, with the followimg assets :— ge eh Balance in Treasurer’s hands a ss. oe Memoir Fund (for printing) ... iF ... 229 4 4 Extension Fund (for buildings) —.... +, ee Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries Fund (for Fisheries research) ... Bt: oe aes CAPITAL ACCOUNT. 1. British Workman Public House Co., 99 shares £1 each, fully paid. 2. The Trustees of the British Association (1896) Fund also transferred to the University their fund of about £1,000 to be held for the benefit of the researches carried out at Port Erin in continuation of the work . of the Liverpool Marine Biology Committee. This has since been invested in £1,135 16s. 7d. Funding Loan, 4%, 1960-1990. The Isle of Man Government, by the terms of the agreement, makes an annual grant of £200 im aid of the work of the Hatchery, and the balance of that grant, amounting to £95 12s. 5d., for the current year, was paid over to the Accountant as from the date of the promulgation of the Act in July. This amount was received in September, 1920, and therefore does not appear in the present accounts. The List of Subscriptions and Balance Sheet will be found on the following pages. The accounts are made up to 31st July, 1920, the end of the University financial year, MARINE BIOLOGICAL STATION AT PORT ERIN. LIST OF SUBSCRIPTIONS TO 31st JULY Brunner, Mond & Co., Northwich.. Druoomer, J. FP. l., 48, Hartington Gkiedemal fionden, S.W. :.. . Brunner, Roscoe, Belmont Hall, noe Saveon rol,’ R. J. Nth The ae a Liverpool ie Graveley, I’. H., Indian ree, ‘aledtis oll G: J. : Erolt, Dr, A., Fopebinds, TEadion Higtah, Hutton, J. As Woodlands, Alderley Edge Isle of Man Natural History Society Jarmay, Sir John, Hartford, Cheshire ie Livingston, Charles, 16, Brunswick-st., Liverpoot Manchester Microscopical Society... 2 Meade-King, R. R., Tower Buildings, hiverpool... Mond, R., Sevenoaks, Kent... Petrie, Sir Charles (The late) Rathbone, Miss M. fe Roberts, Mrs. Isaac, Thomery, 8. et & M., Te eee Robinson, Miss M. E., Holmfield, Aigburth, L Eat Roper, Miss M. H., Newnham College, Cambridge Smith, A. 'T., 43, Castle-street, Liverpool... Thomas, Dr.W. Thelwall, Rodney-street, Liverpool Thornely, Miss, Field Head, Out Gate, Ambleside Thornely, Miss L. R., Field Head, Out Gate, Ambleside - Toll, J. M., 49, Newsham-drive, nenpoal Walker, ey Q., Uleombe-place, Maidstone Watson, A. T., Tapton Crescent-road, Sheffield ... Whitley, E., 13, Linton-road, Oxford ; hoe. NS) bo = Sis i be © S Soe See ee NS eee eer ee eS = a a NO S @ hee eer eS See 1S SoS Oo O10. o pe (a) oe hD “bel? CO bt [DO Se ce Sc, eS to He co = OD (op) | 56 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. SUBSCRIPTIONS FOR THE Hire oF ‘“‘ WorkK-TABLEs.’’ University, Liverpool she Bae oe :.. | SOR Victoria University, Manchester ... ae 2 1) AO Se University College, Reading ie ast ae be | University College, Nottingham ... FL c Rielle eipivielale/c\elalere velsiciule/elbielaleis\eieiaieis\vieles/sivie's ‘ivisreeieiseicies soLmpung 66 e Z 6 SPI i, ro eI GGOE veya colognes pur sngeieddy ‘s00gT 66 C ST 0 Cece ccc eee e reese seers ees ‘ow ‘SULUBOTD) ‘qq suy ‘Ten, 66 e OL ise aS” SHOU COU UOUUNUUUOUUGIOOD Axrepeg S.1U84SISSV jo ereyg 66 O OL GP (souvInsUy Surpnout) Areyeg $,cojesiny) a6) aIBYS OL “p 'S ay —JUnOv0V [vilouer) (‘paysyqnd sv ‘szunooop figussaarug, wouz) ‘OZGL ‘ATOL TE OL AUVANVE T GOIMAd AHL UOT SENAWAVG GONV SidIGOMY Ao LNAOODY TLNOQOOOV NIV LdOd ‘ KHAVUYVONVAVO TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 58 "SJUDJUNODIIP pasaqeoy yD “OZ6L ‘snbnP LZ ‘loodumAry LIANS DIA, J, ‘NOS ¥ YANNVA GOONUVH SHNOL AHNGAS ‘9 "q9OIIOO ST 41 yey AjI4100 puw Jooyg oourleg oaoqe oy poururexe oAey 9A\ LT C6FIS _v. LT S60TF Oo Wn age as LOJVING Jo spuvy Ur YSseg CenpaCn -°: pos ws "* - puny WOrsueyxXnT ional seal 1.0) Paes “ youvig s,poomfo}yy pozruivy 9 § 88 ‘ SOTLeqsSTy puv orngnowsy jo Ar4srurpy ‘SuIgIV], puv [oodasary jo yueg ut yseo He es a a © FT 686 : G OL 6&4 a nts puny ILOWoT 00 08 “ '* — OOTs '% ¥ Pug AxugorA a ey eee 6 8 88h °° ore sh ‘DL “SOL GOTT Soe GkO sea ‘O66T-096E ‘%F Uvoyz Surpuny O=20508 at se ulyURYy UYOR APY Oy Ge jinn 2: “* paqiury ‘Auedutog osnofzy Gr E606) “ 9994TUIUOD [BOIsoTOT_ [GU $,USUIyIO MA YS ULsoIvys 66 euLIvy foodsrearvy woaz JeysuVay, —4S09 4B SJUSUTASOAUT —: suolyeu0g (OZ6T ‘POP vafsunasy, haoyounpey (OZ6L ‘29K “afsunsy, Kssyooy Used Be AOS qvorbojorg ay,J, aprA ) | Ysug ban Uorynig Jnobojor1g 2y,7, aprA ) ex1yuoo r3d Ss : IS AVASL AGATE (6 ev1yu00 10d vn ae “| O46 Stes woiy ATOyoyVy, YstA pue worry wory =ATOyOYeA YSA pure uUoryeys [BOIso[olg UlInT 410g Jo osveTT SIvVAX GG [VOLSO[OIG Ul, JIOG JO osvorTT sIVOX GG Pees Rae F DSSS 2 Oe) Dre ees: SLUSSV SHILITIAVIT OZ6I ‘ATNF Tg ‘LHHHS BDONVIVG WENOQOVOV NTUH LAOd + AHAVXOONVAOO 59 NOTES ON DINOFLAGELLATES AND OTHER ORGANISMS CAUSING DISCOLOURATION OF THE SAND AT PORT ERIN. By H. CatHerine HerpMan, Newnham College, Cambridge. (Read 10th December, 1920.) In the Annual Reports of 1911 and 1912, accounts were given of greenish-brown patches on the sandy beach at Port Erin. These were shown to be due to the presence, sometimes in large numbers, of an actively motile Dinoflagellate described as Amphidinium operculatum and sometimes of abundant Diatoms. The discoloured patches of sand were seen to vary in size and position from time to time and, in the individual patches, it seemed that Dinoflagellates were replaced by Diatoms and these, in turn, by more Dinoflagellates. It was observed that the discolouration disappeared shortly before the patch of sand was covered by the rising tide, and only reappeared after that part of the beach was once more exposed. No Amphidinia were present in tow-nettings taken in a few inches of water over the position occupied by the discoloured patches. It was therefore assumed that, at these times, the organisms had gone down to the deeper layers of sand. The variation in extent of the patches seemed to be greater, on the whole, at neaps than at springs, and it was suggested that possibly some correlation existed between the abundance of Dinoflagellates and the state of the tides. A considerable divergence of form was noticed between the individual Amphidinia, but it was thought that they were probably all varieties or possibly different stages in the life history of the one species. This summer, in July, August, and September, some further observations were made on the occurrence and D 60 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. distribution of the various organisms responsible for the discolouration. The patches were examined daily from July 28th to August 17th, and from September 6th to September 28th, and were found to vary greatly in extent. This variation showed a periodicity corresponding with the tides, but in the opposite direction from that recorded in 1911 and 1912. The various organisms were present in enormous numbers at spring tides, so that the greater part of the south end of the beach was discoloured, while, at neap tides, the patches were small, isolated, and much less clearly marked. Another point on which this year’s observations do not agree with those made in 1911 and 1912 is the alternation of different organisms on the same patch of sand. Throughout the time when the beach was examined this summer, although neighbouring patches were produced by different organisms, © each patch was always characterised by one predominant organism, so that it was possible to predict the cause of discolouration in any sample of sand, provided its position on the beach were known. Again, while most of the patches disappeared about half an hour before that area of sand was reached by the rising tide, a few of them were always visible on the surface, even when covered by water. According to the previous reports, the Amphidinia showed positive helio- tropism. Experiments made this year all seemed to show that the movements were negatively heliotropic, but it was evident that they were affected more by variations in the amount of water present than by different intensities of light. Several species of Diatoms were found forming patches which could generally be distinguished by their rather bright brown colour and by the fact that, for the most part, they remained on the surface at high tide. The Dinoflagellata were represented by at least three species of Amphidinium, one or more species of Gymnodinium, Polykrikos, and a few unidentified, colourless, naked Dino- NOTES ON DINOFLAGELLATES, ETC. 61 flagellates. Several of these forms were figured in the reports of 1911 and 1912 as varieties or different stages of Amphidinium operculatum, but they have since been described by Kofoid as distinct species and, as they seem to keep definitely to their respective positions on the beach for considerable periods without changing, it is probably more satisfactory to regard them as species rather than varieties. The differences in form are made clear in the accompanying outline sketches (p. 62). Amphidinuum herdman, Kofoid, corresponds to the “short ” form figured in the report of 1911 as A. operculatum. It differs from A. operculatum as described and figured by Claparede and Lachmann in 1868 in the size and shape of the operculum. A. asymmetricum, Kofoid, is the same as the “long ” form of A. operculatum described in 1912. A. sulcatum, Kofoid, is not among the forms figured in the previous reports, but occurred abundantly this summer. It seems to be the only species of Amphidinium which remains at the surface when covered by water. In the laboratory, while A. herdmani and A. asymmetricum will live and multiply on damp sand but do not flourish in the presence of too much water, A. sulcatum will multiply in sea water alone to such an extent as to form, in a few days, a thick slimy scum. Gymnodimum sp. ? was present in considerable numbers over a very restricted area. It was found only in and close to a trickle of rather fresh water draining down from behind the harbour steps. (See Sketch Map, p. 63.) It was always associated with large numbers of Diatoms, and was found on the surface at all times of the tide. It also multiplied in water in the laboratory. Polykrikos sp.% occurred fairly regularly on certain parts of the shore though never in such abundance as to cause discolouration. (See Sketch Map.) Euglena spp.? The two species of Huglena each occurred pi 62 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. in one isolated patch only (see Sketch Map) and were often not present in appreciable numbers at neap tides. They both disappeared before the tide reached them. The discolouration A = Polykrikos Sp? Bi = A.asymmetricum. (ventral view. B2 = same (side view) C1= A. Suleakum. (ventral view) C2 = same (side view.) Di =A.herdmani. (ventral view.) 2 =Same(side view.) Et = Gymnodinium. sp? (ventral view.) E2= Same (side) nm = Nucleus- produced by them was distinctly greener than that caused by the Dinoflagellates. NOTES ON DINOFLAGELLATES, ETC. 63 Diatoms. Brown patches were caused by several species belonging to the genera Navicula, Pleurosigma, and others. Oscillatoria sp.? The only other organism which ever appeared so abundantly as to cause discolouration was Oscillatoria. This was almost always present in and around the trickle of fresh water in the harbour, and occasionally increased so as to form small dark green patches. (See Sketch Map.) yy tj i. i, in IY) O ff . ; wy CBOE uth YW Go Port Erin. Sandy beach. jy Lip Y a P ey Distribution of organisms RAE : at spring lides- a M Lighthouse . D. Di Dic Upper limil of darnp sand. D: D: D : HWM. LWM. D; Springs) (Springs) a ae wy Se —0o Well- D: D: —=> ‘ { aie XK re 3) ok > Joe mS. LK XK BS i PET KSIOC (De D , Cake xk K P : PS ELEE EOL EE D A beh KKK LK HK D " x Xx ee li A K aK a HA hoe KH KK KH a A: AL KR KAL A K 4 Ay De Diatoms. A OK oh KK LK D A’ O* Oscillatoria.- D> Rao D A ET - Euglena I sp eae pe eaens mK = Arynphidinie b-icom. Go \ aoe X= Asuleatussee on f\ er a & =A. nerdmani. P - Polykrikos- l¥ serhanning tresh water, 64 NOTE ON SOME EXPERIMENTS ON THE WATER VASCULAR SYSTEM OF ECHINUS. By Ruts C. BamsBer, M.Sc. [Read December 10th, 1920.] In 1887, Professor Marcus Hartog* published a paper on “The True Nature of the ‘ Madreporic System’ of Echino- dermata, with Remarks on Nephridia,” in which he put forward the view that “‘ we must needs regard the madreporic system and the ‘ vasal’ part of the vasoperitoneal sac as constituting a left nephridium, the right having failed to receive a duct.” Previous to this, the generally accepted view was that water enters the water vascular system through the madre- porite, and is probably lost gradually by passing out through the walls of the tube feet, etc. Hartog supports his view by experiments which seem to prove that there is an owtward current through the madreporite, as would be expected if the water vascular system is an excretory organ. Fresh specimens oi Hichinus were opened and. the madreporic canals removed and slit longitudinally on one side: they were then examined in the perivisceral fluid and he reports a strong inrush of particles through the slit, and a corresponding outward flow through the cut end towards the madreporite. The madreporite of an Echinus and of several starfishes, with part of the stone canals attached, were removed and examined in sea water with powdered charcoal in suspen- sion. No particles ever settled on the madreporites. Normal and eviscerated specimens of Antedon were examined disc upwards in sea water, with charcoal im suspension. No particles were observed to settle on the discs except along the imperforate ambulacral grooves. * London, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 1887, pp. 321-326. WATER VASCULAR SYSTEM OF ECHINUS 65 Hartog concludes, “the above experiments show clearly that the perforations of the madreporite in Echinus and Asterias, and of the disc in Comatula, are purely excretory, and serve to elimimate the excess of water taken up by the body.” These experiments and the view they seem to support met with much criticism. Cuénot* claimed that ciliary action on the madreporite would give Hartog’s results, without any outward current. He considered “ qu’il n’y avait ni courant (entrée, ni courant de sorti; tout ce que l’ou peut admettre, a la reeueur, c’est qwil se produit une diffusion lente au contact des pores madré- poriques entre le liquide des cavités environnantes et l’eau de mer ballotée en tors sens par les cils.” He did not support this view by experiment. Later}, he suggested that the cilia liming the stone canal keep up the pressure in the water vascuiar system by constantly tending to produce an inward current. Ludwigt brought forward experimental evidence to prove that there is an ward current through the madreporic pores. He examined different adult Echinoderms, also Auricularia larvae, in perivisceral fluid, with or without particles added, and reported a distinct enward current through the madreporite and down the stone canal. MacBride§ also claims that the current is znwards. After keeping Amphiura squamata living for several days in sea water with carmine or lamp black in suspension, he found, on cutting sections, that some particles were present in the pore canals. In 1913, Mr. Burfield and myself, working at the Port Erin Biological Station, repeated some of Hartog’s experiments and added others, as follows :— EXPERIMENT 1. The madreporite, with the stone ‘canal * Cuénot, L. Leipzig, Zool. Anz., Vol. XIII, pp. 315-318 (1890). + Cuénot, L. Bruxelles, Arch. Biol., Vol. II, pp. 313-680 (1891). { Ludwig, H. Leipzig, Zool. Anz., Vol. XIII, pp. 377-379 (1890). § MacBride, E. W. London, Quart. Journ. Micros. Sci., Vol. XX XVIII, pp. 339-411 (1896). 66 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. attached, was removed from a fresh Hchinus, and examined in sea water with particles of carmine in suspension. The particles were always driven back from the madreporite just as they were about to settle. The behaviour of these particles strongly suggested ciliary action on the madreporite. EXPERIMENT 2. In order to test for any outward flow through the madreporite apart from the action of cilia on its surface, a fresh Echinus was obtained and its madreporite carefully scraped. The madreporite with the stone canal attached was then removed from the animal and examined in sea water with the particles in suspension. All particles were still driven off from the madreporite as though by an outward current. . EXPERIMENT 3. A madreporite with the stone canal attached was placed in a vessel of sea water with particles suspension, and left for several hours. It was then found that a mass of particles had collected around the cut end of the canal suggesting that there had been an inflow there, and consequently, an outflow through the madreporic plate. EXPERIMENT 4. Stone canals and ampullae were examined in sea water under a binocular microscope. A continuous circulation was distinctly seen by the movement of the corpuscles in the fluid of the ambulacral system. In the ampullae the direction of this circulation was very indefinite, but in the stone canal there was a very distinct central current towards the madreporite, and peripheral currents towards the oral surface. The peripheral current seemed to be the result of ciliary action on the lining of the canal. Experiment 5. Coloured fluid was injected into fresh specimens through the interambulacral areas. The punctures were sealed with plasticine, and the animals kept m fresh sea water for several days (different coloured fluids were used ; e.g., methyl blue, methyl green or fuchsin in sea water ; also carmine in perivisceral fluid). This experiment gave no WATER VASCULAR SYSTEM OF ECHINUS 67 result. The animals were apparently not healthy ; the whole of the interior stained, but there was no sign of any colour being excreted anywhere. These experiments seemed to support Hartog’s view, but were by no means conclusive. In 1915 I carried out other experiments, and have con- tinued them either at Haster time or during the summer, every year since then, at Port Erin. 7 It seemed doubtful whether evidence obtained from dissected madreporites and stone canals could be relied upon; therefore in the following experiments dissection has been avoided as much as possible. EXPERIMENT 1. Stone canals were examined under a binocular microscope without being removed from the animal. This is easily done by cutting a window on each side of the animal and examining it in a glass vessel filled with sea water. The currents seen agreed with our previous observations ; there is a peripheral current towards the oral surface, apparently caused by cilia lining the stone canal, and a central current towards the madreporite. It is impossible to decide from observation which of these is the main current, but the fact that both are present perhaps accounts for the directly opposite reports of Hartog and Ludwig. Observations made with a binocular microscope leave no doubt on this point. EXPERIMENT 2. lLaving specimens of Echinus were examined in sea water with charcoal or carmine in suspension. No particles were ever seen to settle on the madreporite, although they settled freely elsewhere. A large number of specimens have been examined in this way, and always give the same result. As one observes the phenomenon the impres- sion strengthens that the action is due to cilia on the surface, and not to a steady outward current, in spite of our previous experiment with a well-scraped madreporite. EXPERIMENT 3. To test for surface ciliary action the 68 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. madreporite of a fresh Echinus was touched with a brush dipped in formaline. The animal was immediately plunged into fresh sea water to prevent the action of the formaline from spreading beyond the surface of the madreporite. This animal was then examined in sea water with particles in suspension, and no longer gave any suggestion of an outward current through the madreporite. Particles settled freely over its whole surface. Obviously any appreciable outward action is due to the cilia on the surface of the madreporite or just inside the madre- poric pores, and not to an outward current. This, of course, does not disprove a very gentle or an intermittent outward flow, such as one might expect from an excretory organ. Feeding experiments were therefore attempted to settle whether or not any excretory matter finds its way out of the animal through the madreporic system. EXPERIMENT 4. A dozen Echini were fed with dry methyl blue. They were then kept under observation im running water for several days. No colour appeared anywhere on the surface, and on opening the animals it was found that the methyl blue was simply coated with mucus, and was not being absorbed at all. No results have so far been obtained from any feeding experiment. EXPERIMENT 5. Dry methyl blue was put mto the coelom through a little puncture in the interambulacral area. The puncture was sealed up with putty and the animal kept in fresh sea water. After one night the whole peristome and the buccal branchiae were bright blue, but no colour appeared anywhere else on the surface, although the animal was kept under observation for many days. Many specimens have been treated in this way and always give the same result. This experiment, like the feeding experiments, gave negative results for the function of the madreporic system. EXPERIMENT 6. To test for a possible cward current WATER VASCULAR SYSTEM OF ECHINUS 69 many specimens of Hchinus were kept in fresh sea water coloured with methyl blue*. The animals were opened at intervals of one to five days, and every specimen showed colour in the axial sinus; many had the axial organ stained very deeply, two had a doubtful suggestion of colour in the stone canal directly under the madreporite, but not a single specimen showed any colour at all in the stone canal beyond this point. On another occasion an Kchinus was kept in methyl blue and sea water for two days, then opened. The stone canal and polian vesicles were bright blue; there was no colour at all present in the axial organ. These experiments seem to prove that there is no con- tinuous current in either direction in the madreporic system. That fluid passes in through the madreporite seems certain, but apparently it passes sometimes into the axial sinus, some- times into the stone canal. Gemmellt found, by cuttimg thin sections of fresh madreporites, that “the cilia on the surface of the madreporite act tangentially, and tend to sweep away any foreign particles. No pore-canal system as a whole has its cilia acting oralwards, but in each pore-canal there is a short superficial segment which shows the converse condition.” Our observations agree with this report exactly, but do not throw very much light on the apparently erratic action of the whole system as shown in ixperiment 6 above. From work on Asterias and Solaster, Gemmell found that the ciliation of the axial sinus is in an aboral direction. Whether this is true or not for Kchinus also has not been ascertamed to my knowledge. But be that as it may, the ciliation of the madre- poric system clearly does not account for our observed facts. Probably,as Cuénot, MacBride and Gemmell have suggested, the * Methyline blue is useless for this experiment owing to the fact that living tissue reduces it to a colourless leucobase. 7 Dr. J. F. Gemmell. London, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Series B., Vol. CCV, pp. 213-294 (1914). 70 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. action of the cilia lming the stone canal serves to keep up the pressure in the ambulacral system. If the pressure in this system is high no fluid will be able to enter the stone canal through the madreporite in spite of the action of its ciliary lining. Cuénot has also suggested that fluid may enter the body cavity through the permeable axial organ, and this view seems to be supported by these experiments. There is no evidence to prove that excess fluid does not also leave both ambulacral system and body cavity through the madreporic system. Apparently the whole question is one of balance between internal and external pressures. : 71 ON THE INHERITANCE OF COAT COLOUR IN THE VARIETIES OF RATTUS RATTUS. By J. W. Curmore. [Addendum to Paper in Vol. XXXIII, p. 70.] Since the publication of the first part of my article I have completed my experiments on the Rattus group so far as I could with the accommodation at my disposal. From an analysis of the results I find :— (1) That mating f. r. rattus (black) to R. r. frugivorus or to R. r. alerandrinus (brown), gave an equal number of each colour. (2) That mating brown Hybrid to brown Hybrid, off above, gave all brown offspring like themselves. Bruack x Brown. | | Black 50 %. Brown 50 %. First Hybrid generation. | | | Black Brown Brown 662 %- 334%. - 100 %. Second Hybrid generation. (3) That mating black Hybrid to black Hybrid gave eight black and four brown offspring. Six of the black young showed a white mark on the chest, similar to those mentioned by the late Professor Doncaster as mdicating the mixed dominant character in his experiments with the common brown Rat, R. norvegicus. Professor Doncaster suggested to me that I should test these so marked; I am sorry it was not convenient for me to do so. One of the black Hybrids (the male) of the pair that produced both brown and black offspring had a white spot on its chest. So far as my experiments went no black offspring were produced from brown Hybrids. I am sorry it was not con- venient for me to test the brown young with white ventral D2 t, 72 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. patches. Brown ofispring were produced from black Hybrids (see Table below and Chart above). (4) That from the common brown Rat (norvegicus) mated to the domestic white Rat (albino), gave results in accord with the Mendelian laws of inheritance, and also in accord with the results published by the late Professor Doncaster in the Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. XII, Part 4. (5) That from the pairs of norvegicus females mated to rattus males I had no results. Table of matings and results to show the inheritance of the three varieties, Rattus r. rattus, R. r. frugivorus, R. r. alexandrinus. Exp. No. iw) or Female Parent. rattus alexandrinus rattus alexandrinus Jrugivorus ... rattus rattus Origin. wild caught wild caught Of NO: Zoo Of Now 2): off No. 1 off No. 2 wild caught ...| rattus Male Parent. frugivorus ... rattus frugivorus alexandrinus .| frugivorus ... rathus Ob Nor 2 Origin. wild caught wild caught off No: 1 “3: Of INO 32: ee off No. 1 ..| wild caught f ( | | Result. 6 frugivorus 2 rattus 9 rattus 7 alexandrinus 1 frugivorus 13 rattus 12 frugivorus 1 alexandrinus 17 alexandrinus 13 frugivorus 8 ratius 4 alexandrinus 7 rattus Sex. 33, 3 29 -| 8g, 19 43, 39 3 -| 73, 6 | 5d, 79 Ig 83, 98 | 5d, 89 -| 66. 22 43 33; 49 73 REPORT ON THE INVESTIGATIONS CARRIED ON IN 1920 IN CONNECTION WITH THE LANCASHIRE SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL, AND THE SEA-FISH HATCHERY AT PIEL, NEAR BARROW. EDITED BY Proressor JAMES JOHNSTONE, D.Sc., Honorary Director of the Scientific Work. (With Text-Figures.) CoNTENTS. PAGE Introduction (J. J.) ae 8 fae “ie 73 The Work of the Piel Laboratory (A. S. ) aay he in =e 95 Plaice Measurements made in 1920 (W. B.)_ ... ae oe days ALO Herring Investigations in 1920 (W. B.)_ .. : ae i ‘2 iG Temperature Variations and Tides (R. J. D. ne Be. wea Seasonal Variations in the Composition of the Mussei (RB. JD: ) 146 Intensive Study of Port Erin Plankton ie A. H., A.S.,and H. M. L. *) 157 Variability in Port Erin Plankton (W. A. H.) .. ; 161 Sole Measurements in 1920 (J. J.) te see aes “ ae LO Black littoral sands (J. J.) tk a tek oe sf eee LES INTRODUCTION. This Report, like those that have been issued since 1914, must again be a small one. The reason for this is mainly the greatly-increased cost of publication, but there are also other difficulties peculiar to the circumstances of the time. There is no doubt that the fishery industries are in a very serious condition—perhaps even one of crisis—and so one is obliged to try to discover in what ways the scientific research now being carried on can be of immediate assistance. Obviously the investigations that are mstigated by a statutory fishery authority in this country must have, for their ulterior objects, the attainment of results, or solutions, or information of some kind that will be of material advantage to the idustry—that is their justification as economic research. Now one may E 74 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. submit that it ought to be the function of the industry, and of the administrators, to state the nature of the problems tbat confront them and to ask for such information as may be attainable ; still it is, no less, the task of the investigators to study the economic conditions that prevail and to endeavour to acquire an attitude that will enable them to direct the scientific research along commercially useful lines. In the effort to attain such an attitude I, therefore, refer to the condition of the sea-fishing industries—so far as the information at my disposal goes. The Trawl Fisheries. There is little doubt that many of the conditions of the year 1920 were indicated in 1913—all that the war has done has been to accelerate a change that was apparent ten years ago. In 1911 failing markets were being experienced—as witness the Exhibition at Rusholme, in Manchester, in that year. The steam-trawling trade was nearly stagnant because the available home markets had fully been supplied then and little could be done to develop an export trade in fresh fish. So the “ Wish-as-food ” propaganda of that period took shape and was the expression of a real difficulty in disposing of the . fish that could be landed. It came as a kind of shock during the war years when one realised that, for most English people, fish was not a satisfactory substitute for meat ! The vicissitudes of the steam-trawling industry during the years 1914-1921 would be of extreme interest if some one personally conversant with these affairs would write them up before the first vivid impressions fade. In 1918, 1919, and even early in 1920 there was an appearance of fictitious pros- perity : it was generally believed that large “fortunes” had been made by the owners of fishing vessels, and there were many attempts at the flotation ot new enterprises. The strike of skippers of trawlers at Fleetwood in March, 1920; the announcements made about that time of the “cost of pro- SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. (i duction,” and the failure to materialise of most of the new flotations did much to dispel the illusion of prosperity. The lowest earnings of Fleetwood skippers, I was informed, was £17 a week, and the double of that was not uncommon. At one port the lowest ratings on a steam-trawler had a weekly wage of £2, a daily bonus, while at sea, of 6/-, a share of 2d. in the £ on the earnings of the vessel, and free food while on board and fishing. I don’t think these earnings, either of skip- pers or deck-hands were too big when one considers what is the nature of the work that is done, and I only quote the figures here as illustrating some of the costs of landing the fish. Coal, ice, and other consumable stores, had, it must be remembered, increased in cost in much about the same ratio as wages and bonuses. In June of 1920 a series of average costings taken at several fishing ports showed that it took about 44d. to land the average lb. of fish, while the latter sold at about 14d. to 44d. Far more serious, however, was the incredibly bad means of transport and distribution. When one compares the price obtained for the fish on landing with the price at which it was bought by the consumer in the retail fish shops it becomes evident that an extraordinarily large proportion of the latter price must have been absorbed by the expense of carrying away the fish from the ports and distributing it to the con- sumers, for it is probable that the retailers’ profits were not enhanced in the same ratio as was that of the price paid by the consumers. Even the pre-war transport was far from being all that was desirable, and certainly that of the years 1919 and 1920 was very much worse—-so one heard repeatedly of large ‘quantities of fish that were unsaleable and had to be destroyed. There were “ gluts” at many of the ports, and there was no means of utilising these except the manure factory. The cold- storage, about which one heard so much during the war years, and in regard to which there was so much unfinished scientific investigation, did not materialise. It appears now to be the 76 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. case that the process of “turning round” the trawlers and drifters from war to fishing work was accomplished rather too quickly. A large number of steam-fishing vessels were built by the Government during the war and an attempt was made to hand many of these over to the “ Mine-Sweepers’ Co-operative Association ”-—a fine and generous project which deserved better than to be launched during a time of slump and aban- doned in little over a year. This scheme, and the futile taking-over of the German “ Reparation trawlers ” are indica- tions of the extent to which Ministers had “sized up” the situation of the steam-fishing industry in 1919. So much, then, for the conditions of the last two years—at the present time (March, 1920) there is the certainty, either of an extensive laying-up of trawlers when the Lent fishing season comes to an end, or of a marked break in wages. Smack-fishing was thoroughly decadent long before the war period, and the years 1914-1919 hastened the rate of decline so that (unless, perhaps, the price of coal remains at its present value) this branch of deep-sea fishing will soon become extinct in England. About 1885-1890 there were nearly 100 fine smacks sailing out from Fleetwood and Hoylake: now there. are 17, and it is said that even some of these are on the market. The history of the old Fleetwood vessel “‘ Mary Ashcroft ” is symbolic: She was built at Maldon, in Essex, in 1798, and after fishing in the North Sea for about half a century she was brought through the Caledonian Canal (in 1860) by Mr. Hugh Ashcroft and Pilot John Hesketh to Fleetwood, from where she fished till 1904 when she was wrecked on entermg White- haven Harbour, and was then bought by Mr. Charles Pater, of that port, for £20; raised, refitted,and sent again to sea to be finally condemned ag unseaworthy in 1917. Thus ended an honourable fishing career of 119 years during which those who- worked this old vessel saw the great development of smacking, which culminated in 1885, and saw also the beginning of the ie SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 4X process of decadence which is, apparently, now approaching completion. The Herring Fisheries. The pelagic fisheries had even worse luck than that which was experienced by trawling. There was never (in modern times) a home market for more than about half (at the very most) of all the herrings caught, and so the great drift-net fishery depended largely upon an export trade. This has had many ups and downs, but never so disastrous a period as that of 1914-1920. The two great markets were Russia and Ger- many, and the latter, of course, closed down on August 4th, 1914. With incredible difficulty the Russian market was kept open till the end of 1916: in that year, for stance, a schooner took 200 barrels of salted herrings from Port St. Mary to Whitehaven, en route for Newcastle and Russia, and the freigh- age was 4/— a barrel across the Irish Sea. One cargo, worth £7,000, that did enter Russia cost £28,000 in freight and other charges. Another cargo (at least) was frozen up in the Gulf of Finland, and yet another had to be housed in sheds specially built at the port of landing. A new route was opened up, but in the end the political difficulties of the trade proved more formidable than did the natural ones and the export into Russia practically ceased. It is difficult to learn what was the volume of the trade with Russia and Germany during 1919 and afterwards, but certainly its methods must have resembled gambling rather than respectable business transactions. The great Hast Coast herring fishery carried on during 1919 and 1920 only because the Government guaranteed a price to the fishermen and took over the herrings packed.* This they seem to have done without either courage or conviction, for, early in 1921, it was announced that the guarantee would be withdrawn, and at the time of writing the chances are that * Which so far are largely unsold. 78 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. at least half of the Hast Coast herring vessels will be laid up during the coming season. Nevertheless, m view of the formidable menace of the rapidly-growing Norwegian and Dutch herring export trade it is hoped that the decision may be reconsidered. A contrast between the commercial policy, in regard to fishery, of this country in 1815 and 1919 would be very interesting did time and space permit one to make the investigation. In 1815, after the reopening of the Continental markets, the Government continued the bounties paid on vessels fitted out for deep-sea fishing, and for herrings, cod and Img cured for export, and it was only in 1830 that these “ doles ” were completely withdrawn—by which time the export trade had thoroughly been established. In 1921, however, after two years of what has been, in effect, a bounty on the herring fishery, the present Government has withdrawn the support it offered— and this in the face of a formidable Continental competitive trade which did not even exist in 1815. The prosperity of the pelagic fisheries depends, then, on an export trade, and it is in this respect that scientific and industrial research come into consideration. The present method of curing herrings—by “ gipping ’ > and preservation in strong brine—was invented by a Dutchman in the 14th century, and it is still essentially the same method that is practised in Britain. It can be depended upon to keep herrings good for about a year, perhaps (so that the 1919 pack guaranteed and practically possessed by the Government must now be unsale- able). Just as it 1s in the chemical trades the method of “mass-production ” seems to be a peculiarly British one, Which largely excludes the manufacture of commodities in small quantities and prepared in numerous special ways. So while a great variety of herring conserves are prepared abroad British curers only export pickled herrings in large quantities, and but a negligible bulk of canned fish. During 1916 and 1917 a great deal was written and said about the establishment of an export ae SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 719 fish-canning trade, particularly with regard to the practically unutilised British sprats. A good deal of scientific research work was initiated—and subsequently abandoned—but even this never got beyond the tentative laboratory phase. The application of laboratory methods to the investigation and improvement of the routine factory processes was never attempted—though such an extension is absolutely essential if the investigations are to benefit the industry. But even this display of interest in the canning trades had its effect, for there was a kind of incipient boom about the end of the war and several fish-canning enterprises on a large scale were projected, and certainly those engaged in the embryo British fish-canning industry were keenly alive to the value of experiment and investigation. Now an export trade is the essential condition for further development of the British herring, mackerel, pilchard and sprat fisheries, and headway in this can best be made by concentrating on canning. The pickled herring remains good for about a year and then rapidly and steadily deteriorates, while the herring or sprat canned in tomato sauce improves up to five years, or if canned in oil, up to ten years. In its keeping qualities, then, as well as in its much ereater intrinsic and commercial value, the canned fish is obviously the basis of an export trade. But the bulk of the sprats and herrings at present canned in Great Britain are inferior in quality, and both scientific and industrial research is essential to the development of the trade. As things are it is probable that something in the nature of a bounty on fish canned for export may also be indispensable. It would stimulate production, for an abatement of the Excess Profits Duty (which would have been, in effect, a bounty) might have led to greater output in 1917. Further, a bounty would have stimulated trade by leading to an improve- ment of the product—I assume that the payment of the “ dole ” would be made contingent upon a satisfactory inspection by a 80 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. qualified official (as in the case of the branding of herrings by the Scottish Fishery Board). Thus the pack could gradually be made:better. I see no objections to such a policy except those that are either doctrimaire, or bureaucratic, or simply foolish ones. : I think it is likely that the export herring trade of these Islands will ultimately regam its pre-war magnitude—if that is judged to be enough. Certainly it is unlikely greatly to exceed the level it attamed just before the war. The great markets (Germany and Russia) are after all limited ones, and the South European and Hastern countries do not want pickled nerrings (on the other hand there is an insatiable demand in the East for tinned fish of the sardine type). Already there is a great Norwegian trade, scientifically studied and organised, possessing a national unity, which seems to be very difficult to establish in this country, and turning out products of great excellence. Holland strives mcessantly to regai her “ place in the sun” which she possessed in the 16th century, and certainly the growth of her herring fisheries during late years has been remarkable. To rebuild the British herrmg export trade must therefore be a task of some difficulty, and I am convinced that in attempting it scientific and industrial research will be necessary, while State support, in the form of bounties, may be necessary. The Inshore Fisheries, It is not easy to obtain precise information as to the con- dition of the small-boat and longshore fisheries, but it 1s pretty clear that these also are on the decline. ‘Trawling for fish by ““nobbies ” seems to have fallen off in Lancashire waters : thus, twenty years ago there used to be a small flotilla of Southport and Morecambe boats at Pwllheli for the summer fishing, but now one sees only an isolated vessel. There is little doubt that the growth of the holiday resorts has tended to transform the inshore fishermen into “ bumboatmen,”’ and SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 81 against this tendency it is very difficult to strive. Just now, however, the efforts of the Fisheries Organisation Society seem to be having good results, as witness the Co-operative Societies at Fleetwood and Morecambe—enterprises that appear to me to have all the elements of success. There is no doubt at all that much more could be done to make shrimping and prawning as carried on by these Societies more highly profitable. I was told, at Morecambe, that there were, occasionally, “ gluts ” of shrimps, and that some means of preserving the “ picked ” product was very desirable. Here, then, there is an opportunity for industrial research : say, the preparation of fish and (real) Crustacean pastes; the “potting” of shrimps and prawns in various ways in hermetically-sealed glass vessels, and the preservation of picked shrimps by packing in sterilised bottles, as in the case of fruits. It is quite likely that all these methods may be sound ones from the commercial point of view, but they have all to be tested, and for this purpose machinery must be obtained. It would, no doubt, be difficult for the Co-operative Societies to obtain the plant and work this during the necessary experimental period. In short, a small experimental and demonstration factory 1s wanted, and, since there is little hope of obtaining this through the ordinary official channels, I make the suggestion to the Fisheries Organisation Society. So far as the inshore industry is concerned it is, hitherto, only the latter Society that has been able to “ deliver the goods.” Musselling and Cockling:. The process of decadence is now nearly complete with regard to the shell-fisheries. The general ascription of the cause of enteric fever to sewage-polluted mussels and cockles has closed many markets and some mussel beds. I regard what has happened during the last dozen years as highly discreditable to public administration. The evidence that outbreaks of typhoid fever were set up by the contamination of mussels by sewage was, in all cases, strong enough to justify remedial 82 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. measures, but I am pretty sure that in no case yet known would it have been legal evidence, strong enough to cause a judge to ascribe ilmess or death to the sewage contamination—at all * events that has never been tested. What mostly resulted from the investigations made by this Committee was a crop of administrative procedure. It was fairly easy for a local authority to set the machinery of the Shellfish Regulations in action: much easier, for instance, than to destroy the fly-breeding refuse in its own slums. That procedure involved no investigation other than procuring a sample and sending it to an analyst—or at the most making a “ topographical survey.” Even the methods of analysis have never been thoroughly tested and improved. There has been no recognised “ standard of permissible impurity.” There has been no adequate and systematic investigation of the general distribution of “ coliform ” sewage bacteria in the sea. There have been restrictions, and a confusion of administrative methods in the experience of which it gradually became evident that the local Fishery Authorities were practically impotent in the matter since their powers of regulation were inadequate, while the Central Authority was impotent for the same reason and also because of its want of resources. The authorities that do have the necessary regulating power—that is, the local Sanitary Committee and the Ministry of Health— have quite a different attitude with regard to the questions at issue. So far as this Committee is concerned it cannot be said that it did not “ explore every avenue ” that promised escape from disaster. But the result is that the shell-fisheries are decadent, to say the least. Only in one part of the district (at Conway) has there been any success in dealing with the matter, and this success 1s to be traced to the outcome of scientific investigation carried on by the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries with the assistance of the Development Commission. So far as the ee SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 83 mussel-fisheries of the Lancashire Coast are concerned there is little hope of similar measures being taken, and I can only suggest that the cleansing of polluted mussels for the markets is a matter for controlled private enterprise. I see no reason why this should not be successful, and no reason why the Fisheries Organisation Society should not enable a mussel- fisherman’s Co-operative Society at Morecambe to construct and operate a mussel-cleansing tank. The International Fisheries Investigations. The above allusions to some of the difficulties under which the fishing industries labour are really pertinent, for it does not appear to me that fishery research just now has much relation to the problems that more immediately concern the fishermen and the owners of fishing vessels—whose existence is the reason why there are fishery administrators and mmvesti- gators at all. I attended the meeting of the International Council for the exploration of the sea, which was held im London, in March, 1920. This was the first post-war meeting, and it was very fortunate that it was possible. Itis known that but for pressure brought to bear upon the Government during the war years, by the Board of Agriculture and Fisheries, the British contri- bution would have been withdrawn. In that case there is little doubt that the International organisation would have broken up, and, as things are, it is pretty certain that it could not have been resuscitated for some years to come. It is fortunate, then, that the Council met when it did and took up the threads dropped in 1914: still, one must confess, it was disappointing to find that the representatives chose to look backwards rather than forwards in March, 1920. To the scientific men the fishery problems were still the same as they were in 1914. Research, whether in fishery or in mathematics, must be entirely personal if it is to have complete success. Its mainspring is the curiosity and the desire to make 84 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. new knowledge and find out things in the mind of the investi- gator, and it ought not to matter to him whether the results he is trying to obtain are useful or not—the result is the thing. One can easily “ organise ”’ scientific investigation to such an extent that this motive falls into the background—fortunately, is not easily attainable! The problems upon which fishery investi- as things are, such a degree of “ scientific organisation ’ gators were engaged in 1914, then, easily and naturally slipped back again into prominence—and, of course, they still press for solution, and have to be taken up some time or other in the future. What was really wanted in 1920 (and even at the end of 1918) was the point of view of the fishing industry rather than that of the administrators. Obviously it was the production of food commodities rather than the elaboration of legislative restrictions that the circumstances of the time indicated. The attitude of the fishmg industry was well known, though the creat commercial interests were unrepresented at the Inter- national Conference. It is remarkable that a much broader “ statesmanlike ” (usmg the word in its older and more creditable sense) view was taken by the industry than by: the Statutory Fishery Authorities. I attended most of the meetings held by the Reconstruction Committees of the National Sea-Fisheries Protection Association in 1919 and 1920, and, even then, the present situation and its difficulties were (in great measure, at least) anticipated.* A coalescence of the activities of the various National and Departmental Statutory Authorities concerned with fisheries was strongly urged: it was hoped that the Association would be able to persuade the Government that fishery, in the international sense, was a proper subject for arrangement at the Peace Conference ; codification of fishery law was urged ; internationalisation of and more * For instances, in the ‘‘ Memorandum ”’ submitted to Mr. Prothero in 1918, and in the schemes of reconstruction prepared subsequently by the industry and its advisers. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 85 the Island of Heligoland was suggested; a programme of scientific research was drafted; schemes of education and technical training tor fisher lads were prepared—and so on. But what has since happened has fallen very far short of these ideals. There is still no suggestion, even, of education and training for fishermen, and, on the whole, scientific research is much less well provided for than it was in 1913. The Fisheries Bill promised in the King’s speech in 1920 has not yet appeared. I don’t suppose that fishery was even mentioned at the Peace Conference, and as for vesting the Prussian Marine Biological Station, and the revenues of the Island of Heligoland, in the International Fisheries Council—that, perhaps, would hardly have been regarded as “ practical politics.” To be sure it might only have been the occasion for an irritatingly bureau- cratic and wasteful administration ! Doubtless the reconstruc- tion suggested by the fishing industry in 1918-20 will come aboul—sometime—and when it does it ought to be remembered what was its genesis. Russia was not represented at the 1920 International Meeting, nor were the Germans, although informal communi- cation with some of the latter investigators had been reopened, and it was known that the exploring vessel, “ Poseidon,” had been working since September, 1919. France, which had hitherto been unrepresented, sent a delegate and experts, and it was expected that the United States of America would also come in: this, however, has not yet been arranged, so far as I know. The various sections of the Conference resumed their deliberations very much where the latter were suspended in 1914 except for one matter—the effect of the admiralty restric- tions of 1914-18 upon the fish population of the North Sea. Over-Fishing in the North Sea. It had generally been agreed that there was over-fishing in some areas—particularly the North Sea—though there were 86 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. exceptions to this attitude: that of Professor McIntosh, for - instance, as expressed in his well-known book, “‘ The Resources of the Sea.” One must not forget that “ over-fishing ”—or rather, a progressive diminution in the quantity of socially valuable fish taken from the North Sea—has not yet been demonstrated beyond all shadow of doubt. But however that may be it was agreed that there had been much less trawling during the war years than was formerly the case, and so there ought to have accumulated a “stock” of large plaice. This was, of course, the species upon which most research had been made before the war, and the Council had already “ adum- brated ” certain tentative proposals (I thmk that is the best way to put it) with regard to international regulations. It was important, then, that the effect of the great decrease of exploitation should be estimated: were there more large plaice in the North Sea m 1920 than im 1913? The Danish experts brought forward what, to my mind, was an uncon- vincing argument that large plaice were more numerous in the latter year than in the former one, and the English investigators produced data which, i think, put the matter beyond dispute. But whether the increase in the larger plaice was to be traced to under-fishing in 1915-18, or to a natural periodicity was not so certain—I return to this point later. Anyhow, another year of “ intensive plaice investigation ” was decided upon and arrangements for the conduct of this were drafted. The nature of the possible restrictions to be submitted, later on, to the various governments was not formally discussed, but it was understood that these would probably take a certain form. Upon the condition that the Council would come to the scratch, as it were, and suggest some legislative restrictions depended the future of the investigations—this was the attitude, it must be remembered, at a time when a partial collapse of the British steam-trawling industry had already been anticipated, and when it was fairly certain that the exploitation of the home a SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 87 seas had fallen off, and was likely to continue to fall off. The restrictions that were in the minds of the delegates were, of course, legal size-limits and perhaps a closure of part of the “ Flemish Bight.’ There was no general agreement as to the precise shapes of the restrictions—the Dutch delegates, for instance, adopted their traditional, national attitude of evasion. As to whether the restrictions that were in question could have been enforced—that question did not appear to matter. The discussion had, in fact, that kind of tone which one calls “academic.” Obviously the closure against trawling, by steam and motor-driven trawl-vessels, of a large area of the North Sea well outside the territorial limits ; the prevention of landing of plaice of less than 20 or 22 cms. im length, according to the season, and the closure of the spawning area in the Flemish Bight would involve a rather considerable international police service. Whether it is practicable to provide this at a reason- able cost, and to render it efficient, was not considered. The Herring Fisheries. The Council took up the question of the “‘ Herring Races ” where it had been left in 1914. It was resolved that the bio- metric investigations that were in progress then should be renewed. It was decided to undertake an historical enquiry into the fluctuations of the fisheries for herrings which have been experienced in most EKuropean seas during the last three centuries. The Norwegian and Danish fishery services under- took the organisation of these investigations. The Hydrographic Research. The position of affairs was discussed in the hydrographic and plankton sections, and although arrangements for the resumption of the work, on much the same lines as it was conducted before the war, were thought out nothing practical has, so far, been done. As the Committee are aware, the. periodic cruises made by the “James Fletcher” during the pre-war years have not been resumed, nor have the regular 88 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. hydrographic investigations that were conducted by the British national fishery services in 1914 been restarted on the pre-war scale. Itis apparent now that these monthly, or even quarterly cruises are impracticable because of the greatly increased cost of maintaining the vessels in full commission. Proposals for a greatly modified scheme of research were made by the representatives of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, and the principal feature of these was the collection of samples and observations by means of transatlantic and cross-channel passenger vessels. I think this modification of the older programme is thoroughly practical and adequate. With regard to the Irish Sea, for instance, it would mean sending assistant naturalists once a month on one or more of the vessels working between, say, Fishguard and Rosslare, Holyhead and Dublin, Liverpool and Douglas, and Fleetwood and Belfast, and it would, probably, be quite easy to make arrangements for that purpose with the various Companies. The new programme would mean cutting out the collection of samples of water from the bottom and intermediate levels, since to obtain these soundings are required. But it is likely that surface samples and observations would give us most of the data that are immediately wanted. I undertook, on behalf of the Depart- ment of Oceanography at Liverpool, to look after such work of this kind as would be possible in the Irish Sea and in the Atlantic with respect to vessels sailmg from this port. Plaice Investigations in the Irish Sea. After the meeting of the International Council an arrange- ment was made between the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries and the Committee for the conduct of research into the “plaice problem.” The grant of £1,650 made by the Development Commissioners in 1914 was renewed for the financial year 1920-21, and most of it was expended upon the part maintenance of the “James Fletcher” when engaged on this work and upon the payment of the salary and expenses SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 89 of Mr. W. Birtwistle, who was appointed as Naturalist in the summer of 1920. Weekly samples of plaice were obtained from the various fishing grounds during the period June- December, 1920, and were sent to the Fisheries Laboratory at Liverpool, and the usual length measurements were made on board the vessel when fishing. In this way records of the leneths, when caught, of some 26,000 plaice were obtained on the fishing grounds, and detailed records of the length, sex, stage of maturity, weight, condition and food of about 6,000 plaice were made in the laboratory. Mr. Birtwistle and Mr. R. A. Fleming, Technical Assistant in the Oceanography Department, carried out these investigations. The work is tedious and uninteresting because of its routine nature, but sincerity and accuracy in doing it is essential if it is to have value. I am satisfied that invariable care and _ scientific accuracy characterised the investigation. Another arrangement was made between the Ministry and Department of Oceanography with respect to the same research, and a sum of money was paid to the University for this purpose. Two ‘“ichthyometric assistants,’ Mr. W. C. Smith and Commander A. HK. Ruxton, were transferred from the Ministry’s staff and were paid out of the sum granted. These workers went to sea in steam-trawlers, smacks and small boats and made observations and measurements of the fish caught in the ordinary routine of commercial trawling. In this way very valuable data were obtained from grounds unworked by the “James Fletcher ”’—the offshore regions between Lancashire and Isle of Man and the northerly grounds between the Island and the Solway Firth. The fish studied was the plaice, but I have gone over the records made by the measurers and have extracted the measurements of soles caught by the smacks. These are interesting since they form the first extensive series of observations on the characteristic lengths of soles caught offshore in the Irish Sea. I hope it may be possible to resume F 90 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. this work in May of 1921, when the sole spawning season occurs. I have made a report on these results and have incorporated in it a summary of the Irish Sea plaice investigations carried on by the Committee during the years 1908-1913. This enables one to make a comparison between the post-war year 1920 and the pre-war period. When that has been done it becomes evident that the marked increase in the abundance of large plaice which characterises the Irish Sea no less than the North Sea grounds need not be due to the partial cessation of trawling brought about during 1913-18 by the wartime restrictions. In last year’s report Mr. Daniel summarised the results of the very valuable series of trawling experiments made during the years 1890-1920 by Captain G. Eccles. These relate to a very typical “‘small-plaice” fishery ground, that off the Mersey Estuary, and they show an evident periodicity in the abundance of plaice in this region. Durimg the years 1895-6 plaice were very abundant, and the same was the case during the years 1909-10. Again plaice were relatively very scarce durmg the years 1905-6 and 1915-16, so that durmg the time in which the Committee has been in existence there have been two. cycles of abundance and poverty of plaice. I have shown, also, that there are very marked differences from year to year in respect of the proportion of baby plaice of six to twelve months old that are taken in the shrimp trawl-nets. This means that in some years great numbers of the plaice fry that have hatched out in the Irish Sea die—probably because there is, in those years, insufficient planktonic food in the water about the time when the fry are pelagic—that is, before they sink down to the sea-bottom as completely formed little flat-fish. So when one allows for this periodicity in the abundance of plaice on the fishing grounds it is not at all certain that the effect of the wartime restrictions on trawling was to increase the natural stock of the larger sizes of plaice. It may merely SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 91 be the case (and this is what the Mersey statistics indicate) that the years 1920-22 represent a natural maximum of abun- dance, while the years 1914-15 represent a minimum. Investigations in the Solway Firth. The special grant for plaice investigation made by the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries has enabled us to investi- gate, for the first time, the fishery in the Solway. The upper reaches of the Firth are a typical small-fish region while fairly large plaice occur, in the autumn months, just north and south of St. Bees’ Head. At the entrance to the Solway lies an important plaice spawning ground, and ripe fish with clear, running eggs were taken there at the end of February. The shoals just south-west of Maughold Head, in Isle of Man, are a good plaice ground during the first months of the year, but later the larger fish leave there to spawn at the mouth of the Firth. These investigations are in progress, and I hope that we may be able to study this very interesting region during 1921. In the meantime Mr. W. C. Smith has made a provisional report on the Solway to the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. Work on the Mussel. Mr. Daniel has now nearly completed a year’s observations on the seasonal changes that are undergone by the common mussel. The investigation has been rather difficult since none of the ordinary methods of chemical estimation of the “ proxi- mate food principles,’ proteid, fat and carbohydrate, can be strictly adapted to this shellfish. Modifications in the known methods have to be elaborated in order that the investigation may be as precise as possible. It has been found that the common mussel is a very abundant source of the rare and expensive substance, glycogen, the proportion of which in mussel flesh is connected, in some way, with the spawning act of these shell- fish. This investigation is far from bemg complete, and, so far, a complete spawning cycle has not been studied. A 9°, TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. summary of the main results obtained so far is given in this Report by Mr. Daniel. So far, then, the work of the Fisheries Laboratory has related partly to questions that interested us before the war period (and which, of course, must still be investigated) and partly to questions that are, in my opinion, of particular interest at the present time. To the former category belong the problems of over-fishing, size-limits, and the nature of restrictions designed to prevent impoverishment of the fishing grounds. These I regard as routine investigations which ought to be pursued in order that data may be available in the future when they become of pressing importance. So it 1s necessary, from this point of view, to collect statistical information with regard to such matters as the prevalent sizes of plaice, soles, cod, and some other important species of fish : the composition of the fish populations with regard to year classes and so on. By and by all this information will accumulate and can be worked up from new points of view. To the latter category of investigations belong such as will assist in production—when the time comes that an export trade in fish may again attain large dimensions. These researches ought to relate to the methods of preservation of fish whether by refrigerating, curing, canning, or by other means industrially practicable. In dealing with them there are a host of questions which involve difficult and rather abstruse chemical and bacteriological investigations, and, unfortunately, it has not been possible yet to make a really promising beginning with such work. There is also the very important matter of the further utilisation of the enormous abundance of mussels, cockles, shrimps and prawns that exist in local waters. Tirst of all a renewed survey of the shellfish beds on this coast is now necessary, and this ought to include not only an examination of the foreshore from the point of SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 93 view of sewage pollution, but it ought also to include a natural history survey. The present trade in mussels as food com- modities appears to be coming to an end, and nothing can prevent this but a rational attitude with regard to questions of pollution and a satisfactory standardisation of public health practice. This depends on research. Along with this must go further investigation into the methods of cleansing sewage- polluted shellfish, and the development of means of preserving these animals in one form or other. The latter remark applies also to the trade in shrimps and prawns. This is limited, as a trade in fresh or potted fish, and some more permanent methods of preservation must be devised. One of the troublesome questions which the Committee may have to consider in the near future is that of size-limits with regard to plaice, and possibly other Irish Sea, fishes. The matter does not seem to me to be urgent, for, just now, there is a marked decline in trawling, both with regard to steam vessels and smacks. Inshore fishing has also fallen to a notable extent, and the effect (“if any ”) of this slackening in trawling ought to be equal at least to that of any restrictions on the size of fish that may legally be landed. It does not appear, then, that there is any good reason for the imposition of such restrictions—at the present time, at all events. It is even doubtful (or at least, so I think) whether or not restrictions on the sizes of plaice landed on the North-west Coast of England would do any real good. If they benefited anyone at all it would be the steam trawlers and smacks fishing offshore in St. George’s Channel and in the Irish Sea. Whether or not they would do so is not certain, and I don’t think the benefit to the large vessels would be very apparent. Size- limits of 20 or 22 ems. in the Irish Sea would certainly be very difficult to enforce, and the present police organisation would, I think, fail in such an attempt if the inshore men offered any serious resistance. 94 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Further, I think it very doubtful whether the prevention of landing of plaice less than 20 to 22 cms. long would result in a marked increase in the prevalent size of the plaice caught ofishore. To my mind such restrictions may have to be accompanied by transplanting operations carried out on a fairly large scale if they are to be justified. It is only that further information may be obtained as to the nature of such trans- planting that the plaice investigation is being contimued, for we, probably, have all the statistical data that are required if the only question at issue is whether size-limits should be recommended, and if so, what limits. The whole question is discussed, in detail, in the report which I have made to the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. JAMES JOHNSTONE. DEPARTMENT OF OCEANOGRAPHY, University, LIVERPOOL March, 1921. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 95 SUMMARY OF THE WORK AT PITEL. By ANDREW Scort. Classes at Piel. After an interval of five years, the classes in Navigation and Marine Biology for fishermen were resumed in the spring of 1920. The counter-attraction of high wages compared with the value of the Studentships kept the steam-trawler men at sea. Only the inshore men—the mussellers, cocklers, shrimpers, etc.—applied for enrolment. Three classes were held between 23rd February and 20th April. The second class began immediately after the first class ended. There was an interval of about a month between the second and third classes. Most of the men had been on various kinds of active service during the war. Mr. R. J. Daniel, B.Sc., had charge of the teaching work, taking both the Navigation and Biology Courses. Dr. James Johnstone, who had carried on the Biology Course from the initiation of the scheme for educating the fishermen in the hfe-histories of economic marine animals, had entered upon his duties in the Oceanography Department at Liverpool University and was unable to be present until the last class. The students in the first class were all Morecambe men. Those in the second class were selected from Morecambe, Fleetwood, Blackpool and Southport. The third class was again entirely composed of Morecambe fishermen. The Studentships for the Blackpool and Southport men were pro- vided by their own Education Authorities. The Education Com- mittee of the Lancashire County Council provided all the others. The following are the names of the men who attended the classes :— 23rd February to 5th March.—HEdward Baxter, John Baxter, R. Baxter, Rd. Baxter, Wiliam Baxter, James Swain, Amos Willacy, H. Willacy, Reuben Willacy, Daniel Woodhouse, F. Woodhouse and James Woodhouse—all from Morecambe. 96 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 8th March to 19th March.—John Alexander, Thomas Bell, — John Bolton, Percy Bond, Mark Gerrard, Herbert Hodgson, Arthur Johnston, Morecambe ; William Curwen, Herbert Raw- cliffe, Ernest Wilson, Fleetwood ; Robt. Bamber, R. Cartmell, Geo. Cornall, Blackpool; John Ball, James Rigby, Southport. 19th April to 30th April—W. Armistead, Richard Bartholomew, Walter Bell, Samuel Bond, Thomas Bond, Thomas Gerrard, Walter Gerrard, Thomas Mayor, George Mount and J. Woodhouse—all from Morecambe. A class in Navigation and Marme Biology for school teachers was conducted by Dr. Johnstone and Mr. Daniel from August 2nd to 13th. A number of names had been received for this class, but only five gentlemen presented them- selves when the work commenced. They were C. Saer, 8. A. Palmer and C. E. Watson, Fleetwood ; Harold Milner, West Bromwich, and E. R. Bird, 8. Lowestoft. The boarding-house accommodation at Rampside and Roa Island is very limited. It is almost impossible to secure rooms at short notice, especially during the early part of August as that is the summer holiday time at the large works in Barrow. In event of the August vacation class for teachers being continued it would be well. to try to complete arrangements as early as possible in the spring. Fish Hatching. A return to this part of the work was made in the spring of 1920. Large plaice were collected in Luce Bay in October, 1919,-and conveyed to the tanks at Piel, where they afterwards matured and provided a supply of eggs. For a time, at the end of 1919 and the beginning of 1920, there was every possi- bility that the Furness Railway would be unable to keep up the supply of gas essential for working the gas-engine. The lenethy strike of moulders at that period rendered it impossible to renew defective parts of the plant, especially the cast-iron retorts which had become badly cracked, allowing the gas to SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 97 pass into the furnace instead of into the gasometer. The Gas Department of the railway did all it could to keep up the supply. The store tanks had to be filled up every tide, and the circulation cut down to a minimum to keep the fish alive as long as possible, in event of a breakdown, and allow time to effect temporary repairs. This probably accounts for a late spawning, as no fertilised eggs were obtained until 24th March. The last fry were set free on 15th May. Altogether 1,300,000 eggs were collected and meubated. Sheghtly over 1,000,000 fry were hatched and set free. No flounders were dealt with. The Library. One of the rooms was especially fitted up with cases of shelving during the year so that all the books could be collected together and made more easily accessible to workers. Miss Allen, Departmental Librarian at Liverpool University, came later on in the summer and rearranged the collection, and also prepared a Card Catalogue of it. There is space for considerable additions, and the catalogue will be easy to keep up to date. Plankton. 573 samples of plankton, taken in connection with the intensive study investigations, were received and quantatively examined during 1920. The results are partly dealt with later on in the report. Samples for comparison were collected from time to time and examined. Barrow Channel and the Oil Traffic. Articles have appeared recently in the Press and elsewhere drawing attention to the probable destruction of pelagic life, including fish-eggs and larvae, by the rapid extension of the use of fuel oil in place of coal in all kinds of mechanically-driven vessels. It has been suggested that the accidental or wilful discharge of oil into the sea may produce a surface film which prevents the water absorbing air from the atmosphere so that eventually the surface organisms may be asphyxiated. If the microscopic food of the larval fishes were thus destroyed. the 98 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. larvae would starve to death. The destruction of larvae through the want of sufficient food is not at all improbable, but this is more likely to be brought about by an early spawning of the adult fishes and a late arrival in the spawning area of the winter and spring diatoms, etc. The investigations carried on by the Lancashire Sea-Fisheries Committee and by the Liverpool Marine Biology Committee, which extend over a period of nearly thirty years, show quite clearly that the arrival and abundance of the spring, summer, autumn and winter plankton varies from year to year. Barrow, within recent years, has become a very extensive oil depot, and many millions of gallons arrive in tankers durmg the year. Many of these tankers burn fuel oil. A considerable export trade to distribute the oil is carried on by smaller vessels. The oil-carrying trade has largely developed since the laboratory was established at Piel in 1897. The whole of the sea-borne traffic passes quite close to the establishment, and any detrimental effect on the life in the channel would not have escaped notice. Large beds of mussels occur in the channel, and there is a general bottom fauna of zoophytes, sponges, echinoderms, worms, crustacea, mollusca, tunicata and fishes. Fully one-third of the periwinkles landed in the whole of the Lancashire and Western District are sent away from Piel Railway Station. These are collected along the sides of the channel at low-water, and so far as the records show there is no decrease in the output per man. In the period 1906-1914 the mean annual man average was slightly under six tons. In the period 1915-1917 it rose to nearly nine and a half tons. In 1920 the mean annual man average was nearly eleven tons. Mussel fishing is prohibited owmg to danger of sewage con- tamination, but the beds have not diminished in area or apparent population. Formerly, very large succulent mussels were obtaimable inside the dock area. These have practically disappeared since the building and fitting-out of submarines SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 99 was started at the shipyard. This is generally attributed to the escape of acids from the battery tanks. Dead conger-eels and other fishes have been seen occasionally floating about im the vicinity of the fitting-out berths. The fishery for sea-fish in the channel is carried on throughout the year, but the results are very variable. The fishermen suggest various reasons for this such as too much steamer traffic, too much dredging, and so on. It is quite certain that the success of the plaice-fishery at any rate depends largely on the abundance of young mussels up to half an inch mm length on the beds. As soon as the supply is consumed the fish leave the area. The repopulation of the beds is goimg on every year, but accidents occur, such as sanding up and washing away by storms and tides, and a fishery for plaice may only occur at irregular intervals. The permanent bottom fauna, which can be seen very well at low- water of a spring tide, has undergone no diminution. The plankton of the channel corresponds with what is found offshore and varies with the seasons. Fish eggs and larvae are fre- quently found in the spring samples. In 1919 and 1920 complaints were received from the stake- net fishermen at Roosebeck that large quantities of thick oil refuse were coming ashore and filling the tails of the nets as the tide receded. Numbers of sea-birds were washing ashore in a dead and dying condition. The matter was gone into and the fishermen’s reports were found to be correct. The receding tide for days at a time left the shores coated with oil, which made everything very slippery. Quantities of thick, black oily matter of a somewhat spongy consistency were also washing up, and in this were immersed dead and dying black ducks and divers. A point that was noted and also corrobo- rated by the fishermen was the complete absence of dead or sickly fish, and the shell-fish, mussels, periwinkles, etc., were not being affected. It seemed to be quite clear that the oily matter, although it was apparently destroying the sea-birds, 100 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. was not injuring the fish and shore fauna. The barnacles everywhere between tide marks set free their larvae in the spring of 1920 and 1921 in great abundance as in past years, and later on the young barnacles attached themselves to the bottoms of boats. The destructive action, so far as has been discovered, was entirely confined to the birds. What probably happened was that the birds regarded the floating masses as garbage of some kind and dived into them, or they may have come up accidentally into them after a dive some distance away. The whole bird would at once be covered with the frothy oily matter, which was very adhesive, and would finally become suffocated. At that time vessels were being reconditioned, and the refuse from the bilges, etc., was discharged into barges. It was then conveyed out into Morecambe Bay where it was discharged, and the southerly winds drove it ashore. The occurrence of oil refuse on the shores of the channel was reported to Mr. J. M. Mawson, the then representative of the Barrow Town Council on the Sea-Fisheries Committee, and it came to an end. No further complaints have been received from the local fishermen. There are natural phenomena occurring every day at sea which set up perfectly smooth places on the wind-roughened - surface. Shoals of pelagic organisms may become massed together by the action of wind and tides, and drift ashore as an oily tract. The winter invasion of Noctiluca, described in the Report for 1919 (p. 6), supplied a characteristic instance of wind action and surface drift on pelagic life. The whole of the north side of the water in the channel for a distance of nearly a foot out presented the appearance and consistency of brick red- coloured grease. It was due to a huge abundance of Noctiluca drifted mto the harbour by a sheght southerly wind. An uninstructed person might well be excused if he had reported this as grease. The correct management of an aquarium depends upon one of two things. There must either be a constant circulation SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 101 through the tanks, or little or no circulation but an abundance of growing vegetation. Aeration with a force pump has much the same result as the action of growing vegetation. Should the circulation stop through any cause, the animals in a tank which has no vegetation die off in the ratio of their vitality. Organisms such as Noctiluca have been kept alive in a perfectly still tank fora month. An aquarium with growing vegetation in it requires practically no circulation. We have a small fresh- water aquarium that was started many years ago in connection with the classes for school teachers. Vegetation was induced to grow and it still continues in a flourishing condition. All that is needed is a cupful of tap water added at intervals to make up the loss from evaporation. Various organisms, such as Hydra, Copepoda, Cladocera and Limnaea, have become estab- lished and one generation succeeds another. A freshwater stickleback placed in the jar in August, 1920, remains alive and healthy after a lapse of eight months. Weeds and Diatoms, in the presence of light, are the chief aerators of the sea. The water is never perfectly still and the pelagic organisms are constantly moving up and down in it. A surface film of oil will not cut off the light sufficiently to prevent the algae and Diatoms keeping up the aeration. Its lighter specific gravity will also keep it clear of the pelagic organisms. When the film of oil stranded on the sands, the Navicula, and other species of Diatoms which form conspicuous brownish patches on the surface, were not destroyed although the film was spread over them. There is as yet, so far as Barrow Channel is concerned, no indication that the oil trade and the extending use in the con- sumption of fuel oil has had any harmful effect on the fauna and flora. The chief engineer of one of the tankers making frequent voyages to Barrow tells me there need be no discharge of oil or fuel oil into the water. That would be regarded as uneconomical by the owners and add to the running costs of the vessel. The oil is recoverable from the refuse. 102 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. REPORT ON PLAICE MEASUREMENTS, 1920. By W. BIRTWISTLE. Although a few samples were examined in the early part of the year, the main investigations did not commence until June, and the bulk of the data was obtamed between this month and the end of the year. The measurements of length alone were all carried out on board on live fish, either in the sailmg cutters or on the 99 fishery steamer “‘ James Fletcher,’ and the age and weight determinations were made in the Fishery Laboratory of the University of Liverpool from unselected samples of the ordinary catches. The three main areas sampled were Nelson Buoy, Mersey Estuary and North Wales. Netson Buoy Area is the area enclosed by a line drawn N.E. from Morecambe Bay Lightship to Walney, and a line drawn §.8.E. from Morecambe Bay Lightship until Formby Point is due East. Join these points for the southern limit. It does not include the area enclosed by a line drawn from Roa Island to Sunderland Shoulder. Mersey Estuary includes all that area enclosed by a line drawn from Formby Pomt to Pomt of Ayr (Wales). Nortu Wates includes all that area between Point of — Ayr and Pomt Lynas. It includes Beaumaris Bay to the northern entrance to the Menai Straits. Summary of Fish measured at Sea. Area. Number. Period. Nelson (Buoys. 22.>-c0- 8,046 June-Decemiber h..--.- see 6 inch Trawl. North) Wales .22%......2- 5,656 January-December ......... Re Mersey Estuary ...... 7,653 March-November ......... 3 MAT Ae: 1,249 November-Decembet ...... Shrimp Trawl. Carnarvon Bay ......... 414 April= Augusta's. s.0-cescsneee 6 inch Trawl. Menai Straits. ......... 1,152 January-December ......... 33 Cardigan Bay............ Li eyg April-September ............ be inige Bay ch ajerackrnebe 194 Octobets caecoecs bees - Morecambe Bay ...... 415 August-December ......... Stake Nets at Flookburgh Potal saense 25,956 a SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 103 Summary of Fish examined in Fishery Laboratory, Liverpool. | Area. Number. Period. Nelson Buoy ......<...0 1,884 June-December .....:...... 6 inch Trawl. North, Walesi..0....00... 1,616 June-December ............ i Mersey Estuary ...... 710 May-November ............ _ A ee 866 November-December ...... Shrimp Trawl. Menai Straits ......... | 829 January-November ...... 6 inch Trawl. Carnarvon Bay ......... 34 ML pk cine setae sdeesastaven nese ders % Motal 2... 5,939 | Tasues I to V are summaries of Length-Frequencies of fish taken on the various grounds by the 6 inch mesh Fish Trawl. Taste VI is a summary of Length-Frequencies of fish taken in the Mersey Estuary Area by the 2 mch mesh Shrimp Trawl. TaBueE VII is asummary of the Sex-Age Group-Frequencies taken in the North Wales, Nelson Buoy, Mersey Estuary Areas by the 6 inch mesh Fish Trawl from June to December. Tas_E VIII is a summary of the Sex-Age Group-Frequen- cies taken in the Mersey Estuary by the 2 inch Shrimp Trawl, from October to December. TaBLE IX is a summary showing the variations in value of the Length- Weight Coefficient K from the respective grounds from June to December. In this table is given the number of fish from which K has been calculated. For indispensable assistance in the very laborious, routine, biometric work of this and the followmg report I am much indebted to Mr, A. Fleming, Technical Assistant in the Oceano- eraphy Department. 104 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Tables I-V. Summaries of the Length-frequencies of Plaice taken on the various Fishing Crounds during 1920, by the 6 inch mesh Trawl. Table |. Carnarvon Bay Area. April. May. June. July. August. Length. — No. | % | No. | % No. | % | No. | &% |e Nowaneen 14-5 mee a +.) S0-Geee. | 15-5 : = Maa ME LES) SE 2 | 10-00 16-5 .. = 5 | 4:904 1.2 2 | 10-00 17-5 t.} 2-70 a 1 | 0-98} 1 | 0-54] 4 | 20-00 18-5 1 | 2-70 a 159098 |e fe 2 | 10-00 19-5 be na 3 | 4-29] 4 |. 3-921 1. 1 0-54) Sea an 20-5 3 | S11] 4 | 5-71] 5.1 4:90] 2 | SEOs ie emenD 21-5 1°|°2-70|. 3 | 429] (7 .| 686) 3 | #e2/e sees 22-5 6 |1622| 2-| 2-86| 7 | 686] ° 9 | 4:86) one 23-5 1 | 2-70} 4 | 5-71|, 12 |11-76| 11 | 598) eoe 24-5 Pee eet) i. 10 | 9:80} 19 |10-27] 1 | 5-00 25-5 3°] 811| - 3. )- 4-291 8 | 7e8ab Te. | ieee Ex 26-5 2 (5-40). 3) 429) 12. 111-76) 23 ae ae 27-5 3 | 811] 10. | 14-29] 12 | 11-76] 25 | 13-51 28-54 4, | 2-70|- 28) |-19-43'|. 7. 6-86) Gases 29-5 2 | 540) 6.1.8:57] 1-1 098} 33 Jiueer 30-5 2 | 540{ 9 1286] 3 | 2°94). 41515 ee 31-5 se a V~| 1-43) ._.1. +). 0-984") Syl ese 32:5 2 | 540) 7 -1 10-00 |" = i 3 | 1-62 33-5 as ERIE fh ie 2 {oul08 34-5 3) 1) 4:90 17, ae 2 | Ae0s 35:5 1] 2-70 We Seas | ao agn eee 4 36-5 :. de | d-4321. iS 0-98 37-5 Po) 27024 1:43 | 38-5 - af set lige ot 39-5 : ¥ | 40-5 a. ‘4 ae ten 41-5 te O70! be, 0 a Se ay 42-5 Be Le: lal edge | 1 | 0-98 43-5 allt ext bigs Sf: Ae 44-5 ies ee 45-5 - ee 46-5 Se - 47-5 TAS ges 48-5 ey Wee 49-5 i =] 2°70 BOA Gh OX | sph BLS ls dl 2-70 Totals ...| 37 bese 70 |100-03 102 |99-96| 185 | 99-97] 20 | 100-00 105 SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. Redwharf Bay and Beaumaris Bay. North Wales Area, 6 inch Trawil. Table Il. | Sooaaeoqqgoqooocooqoooocooecoo > S sO] rHFUOSFRFSSHOHHSSSOHFOANOCOHHAAAHSH } < ° SOMMAMAAMOCOOMHHAANGAAOOSOSOSCSOS S r= | = Se Chern . Lae] a . a) SAMAR ORHOORPrPrOOCOrPOHNMNH NAS RRR oS | NH M MR AR eee ne NWOWMONCAN N ANN S) 0 | BSSASOBHMBS eo; ep eNc0 cp odie) NODMHANDON ie NAN > pb ovale ieee! =r) cS fo) msOD OOD Hea to S| oo See ine) Zz + NOCHOMDOMFARHOTNNNS = SOS Se aoe ame eg gens see gee ae es et cee : } me ° TAA MMASSOHMHMOOATHS : oS ah late? coy oe | Sa Ee ae Feb ee el a | © 5 8 INS OMMOHSCODAMMOMONHHSe HMA MMHNN = 2 ts ttt 3s tt tlt de 7 Sites Skink) Tie aie Re ie ee nk na Ue eM re eee aise ca Peo oro) tots HH st Ot st Sa see ° See get eae Ree se ge eT ae Te Te r Hr aca ae a oN “Lt rere ~ fey) Ter. 6) ged way) eid aa) cis aoe ~eorrere ~ oe a I~ S 3 ae | Stleiws = fe) ee i iro 4 ote | oH 7 Sy cea et en 6%, fee due Loma! > HOR DOM MOSODHOHORHADAHAHOHODHOHR DDR ADDDNHNOD 4 SS (PR | sci t a ein Pd oon SIGN lea oN pel oN eB ICN es alae Marci Ce Heallall OG Bs ° cS} AIEEE MMIDHNNARANAMMMMNANROMANG ASR OOnFOO!1S ee EB ee oO fe} PHP LR HO ARAHAAM A OM MAM MO WOW OMI NW OD HOOD Ho OD CI 10 By a rs SNS Se 10 lo HMOr-rmornstHOoOmMnDo HANDDSDONOHDOMDHDH ora) HHH Pe BESO Macey © Slag eee ais ee ee ere ee BS QUCs > Gi ek= str SUS ae Sf oo eh eee ES) SCADSMDOr HAHN 1019 SCNANANNMONnMA HO = O(a (S) () (S S 3 3 = . fi fo) See Sel OCP eR me eM gnn Neocles oP) aot Se ee HEP RIO cao DREN oS CS Wg Rr, eel ad! 16 Z < Pigs A a 1293918 19.13 10.19.15 19.19 19.1.2 1D 1G 19 1S 16-19 1D 18.15 10 1 18 pee ere OO So eS oe oy BS We) oo oe Wl at dil HOAIANANMDHIOOMmOHOMAH HINO ODoOnA ——— a . VOU AI OD 29 CD 6D 6 GD OD CD CFD CY SH SH SH SH SS ss ee f 1D 1D 106 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Table Il. North Wales Area. Redwharf Bay and Beaumaris Bay. 6 inch Trawl—continued. _-—_ ea 1266 | 100-00} 820 | 99-95 | 222 Ae 765 | 99-98) 548 | 99-91] 1252 | 99-98 July. August. September. || October. November. | December, || Length. azn ear : No. of No. | or | Ne. oe No. % No. oo No. Ta | Pals. bape: : 1 | 0-183 | 14-5 4 0-32 I 0-12 . yee 1 0-18 2 0 i6 15-5 2 0-16 300 : 1 0-13 1 0-18 A 16-5 Ly 1-34 toe : 8 1-05 1 0-18 ong 17-5 ol 4-03 7 0-85 sist 19 2-48 | 12 2-11 10 0-80 18-5 86 6-79 | 45 5:49 6 2-70 | 62 8:10) |SaZ2 4-01 | 27 2°16 19-5 123 9-72 | * 95 1-58)" 4:95 | 125 | 16-3 44 8-03 | 29 2-al 20-5 7 9-24); 99 12-:07.| 24- | 10-81). 74 9-67 | 48 8:76 | 42 3°35 21-5 112 8:85 | 79 9-63 | 23 | 10-36| 80 | 10-46} 49 8-94); 40 | 3-19 22:5 95 7-50; 69 8-41) 21 9-46] 41 5:36] 55 | 10-04] 44 3°51 23°5 118 9°32| -77 9-40] 17 7:66 | 49 6-40 | 26 4:74| 62 4-95 24-5 125 Oe eS 07 | 1F 7:66] 38 4-97 | 35 6:39 | 58 4-63 25-5 110 8-69 | 53 6-46] 15 6-76 | 47 6-14) 36 6:57 | 70 5-60 26-5 83 656| 45 5-49 | 22 9-91 | 53 6-93 |- 3t 5:66 | 75 5°95 27-5 59 4:66} 30 3-65 | 17 7:66 | 41 5-36 | -31 5:66 | 113 9-02 28°5 41 3°24] 37 4-51) 12 5:40 | 36 4:70 | 29 5:30 |! 108 8-62 29-5 41 3:24] 36 4-39) 15 6-76 | 33 4-31} 24 4-38 | 113 9-02 30-5 25. | 1-97 |. 20 2°44) Il 4:95] 15 1:96 | 19 3-47 | 105 8-39 31:5 | 10 | 0-79] 20 | 2-44] 4 | 1:80} 8 | 1-05] 10 | 1-80] 82 | "Gem 32°5 3 boat OFA 12 | 1-46 2 0-90) 11 1-44) 15 2°74| 59 4-71 33-5 7 | 0-55) 13 | 1-58] 2 | 0-90) 7 | 0-911 16 |) 2:92)" Soest 34-5 12 0-95 4 0-49 2 | -0°90 4 0-52 4 0-73 | 35 2-79 | 35°5 8 | 0-63 i 0-85 500 500 8 1-05 af 1-28 ay 2°56. 36°5 6 | 0-47 7 0-85 1 0-45 3 0-39 7 1-28 | 18 1-44 37°5 q 0-32 3 | 0:36 599 1 0-13 5 0-91/ 12 0-96 | 38-5 . 1 0-12 ber Re 5 0-91 8 0-64 | 39-5 1 0-12 She | Sees 0-55 9 0-72. 40-5 pe 4 0-73 7 0-56 41-5 LI Ble el re 1 0-18 3 0-24 42-5 SST eng ce ot 4 0-73 6 0-48 43-5 1 | 0-08 / 1 |.0-18| 7 | 9GBI 44-5 aie 556 | ee ene “OE 4 0-32. 45°5 i 0-37 1 0-08 46-5 is 2 0-16 47°5 3 0-24 48-5 6 0-48 49-5 3 0-24 50°5 1 0-08 51-5 2 0-16 52:5 sae SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 107 Table til. Nelson Buoy Area. 6 inch mesh Trawl. June. July. August. September. Length. ee — No. va No. % No. ON No. yf 14:5 pe uns ene se sud 2 0-09 15:5 11 1:25 a ee TT a Aa Na aa tee aes ees i in a © (Cote | aaa GEES eee IP a eee nN E ” es Bo ealsit oe “a es " Crane 29. |. oy go | 9 ea° | ro | 08. \sbee| Pe eI Sh ee Se hae 08/50 Ce eel OF On BA. PS he SE) |-2 O8— (50: | e917 Bie || ite OF le s6 96 6 Pomoc a) Oke GG Sicmer || (ieee Ob. ae 6 16 Pl |e ere Al Sel GG) ce iat oF 06> dae | OR Se Gah 8B Ge) BOE I Te | 06> 1 Ge - OLS ei Be. We Tn 5 66 19 | #6 él G6. (6G) |) 86 ect) SO. | 91a are? 8a] <6 2102 4.26 3c 1 98 08 Le OO tal. Pe ne Meee | Se ted, | %\.16 | 01 | #8 }rz|-79 16.) 08 |S.) 96.) et) 96° | % | @8.] eT. eb | Gal’ 08 PF eee eee. i | 06. | 1 | O8 1t | 09>) s-] 96 | Tt | G6") Gl Fe | 79.) 82 Pe |. 88 nae le Oe ae See ee Oe i | ee | eo} eh | |) eset | BG || ORT | 08 ur ee | | ope | Meee eee el oe Yo % | % % % % % % % % > SS) 2S cae ae ae | Paes eal orn tsar Fran ay aaa oe eer Fea, + a e P| | / Jae ae | Bed Pel aie Dee hoy: | Uae athe Oe eth | De el aD e Ae lle Dme el alee | { n "So]VOg SUN 9 ‘so[Vog SULY G = & 91:96 | ¥-68 QL-GL | 9-6F | L-§6 G-8L €-6F 8-88 L-2g ei Yo | % | % % % % % % Yo | weary = | BA Pe Sr eas S| ea as) pot Sa ae eet ‘2 Fe og | og og | og a | GI ZI | g1 ee SS | ——_—_ ———|——— eS : | ~ | a | g 98 lech i *}< 885 | Re ae TO Gs est po | FI ; OUP ses a. | 1 76yy| Ol et 8h, le PL! "|y 08 a8 98 | I rm | 9 86 Sa BG: 5G OGm ls Lest PL, leecli |e Ore | SF 8 | ce 9r | @ v6 | @ elene Os) Ole! OL; ip Olasle Cr. 1036 66 | I i | 2 Gy Wl 06 & og | g Ios No 68 |S 99 | T Bey) al +6 | 6 We il Vena 98 | 9 oF | I eG 2k oa = a Ova pe. | 3 06 | 3 po | 1 08: hI (sae ‘eb % % % % % % % Yo % ee a re ee he ee ee er Se tee ee | Po Be og = a ' ‘soTeog Suly | "soyeog Su ‘sopeog Sury % 124 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Z-86 €-96 9-46 S26 1-68 0-€8 % % % ; % % % rat ra ZI ral ral ral 7 oe in : ‘“ = i . . 86 ¢ 96 6) v6 I eee eee eee . " L6 € G6 zg bee ee £6 I hs e 66 r 96 ¢ +6 € Z6 Z 16 ¢ 98 G 86 9 G6 I £6 I 16 g 68 G ZS 9 LG g +6 g 26 Zz 68 98 € PL I % % % % % % 8p f ns iy Orewa. 20 ip | Of ip | p f *SOTVOG SUIYY 8 1-86 og Tuam tae TeeGate tack ne ae % % % % % sI ce | SI SI 81 m — a , % i e an - a 3 i‘ 66 L LG 9 +6 € G6 z a Fe 86 L 96 z £6 € 16 9 06 I 16 ¢ G6 0 26 9 68 L 98 t 96 I r6 z 16 Z 98 € ZS el % % % % % ‘y p | fp fic Op i % i tp i *So[VOG SUI L ‘ponuyuo-—ea|dwes saquiezdag "qj equ £69 OF | uLoy % % | ZI ZI SL € gc I PL € FG € OL Z OF I 99 I rag rg z9 Z Se Z OP I 0£ € ae % MBM ihaoen Wes ears [22S CD ale oad "p i | hep [ot wee |" SI | SI g¢ I 0g G S OP I I cP € 8 Sf ¢ € PE I I Of G % t | "p ll SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 125 We shall now summarise Tables I and I]——with interesting results. (a) June sample. No. of Rings in a Scale. 2 3 4 J (SR 57-8 41-0 41-0 BOM Oars seein dics ve ew's 33-2 30-0 29-0 CR eR f aoe cine rises decease 91-0 71-0 70-0 PMA lens d ph dia atv cess : 22-0) 18-5 MG inn ckia'y cis je «sie ve 93-0 88-5 PAMERAE (ioe) vhivs Uiatichie dees a BAS 7-3 CMM ran Skee) cihiasste'ek ajc «| 95-8 (6) September sample. | No. of Rings in a Scale. ae 3 | Sas ia) OFS eae te 8 (xt. Cea eee 52:0 49-3 49-4 46:0 44-0 42-4 43 PE Ne a sissies. 36°8 2g-2 26-4 27°6 26-6 27-8 26-3 Cie Sea ae 88°8 78:5 75:8 73-6 | 70-6 1052) | GS De case cscss| 15-2 13-6 12-7 13°9 Sl, ela OU eens astsisy sis 93-7 89-4 86-3 84:5 83-3 83-0 AVS teaaae~ Ape ae 7-4 7-0 6-6 6-5 6-1 CL On ARE 96:8 93:3 91:1 89:8 89-1 Nae dedegs aga ae 38 38 od 3-1 Jp ae 97-1 | $49 | 93-2 | 92-2 ID 8 a cso | any, 2-1 2-8 2-4 ne | 97-0 96-0 94-6 ee. 3 chon. | rag aM | Lei he | “ 98-1 96:3 PO eee eis s aig ES Teena 98-2 In these summary tables the mean values of the d’s are collected for scales that have two up to eight rings. The A’s are the differences between these mean values, that is, they are the mean widths of the zones of the scales added by growth in each year. Thus, in the June 2-ringed scales 33-2 % of the ringed portion is added on during the interval between the 126 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. laying down of the Ist and 2nd rings. But that is only the case with the 2-ringed scales: in the 8-ringed ones only 26-3 % of the ringed portion is laid down between the dates of formation of the 1st and 2nd rings. This curious effect can be observed throughout the tables (if one allows for the errors of the means it is quite general). It seems as if the whole scale shrinks up in the older fish and shrinks the more, the older the fish is. Further, there is an obvious difference between the June and September samples. These results appear to have important bearings, but it will be advisable that other investigations, which are in progress, be made before a full discussion is attempted. Table Ill. Showing Length— Ring frequency. JUNE SAMPLE. SEPTEMBER SAMPLE. ede Rings. Rings. Length nie | il D, 3 4 5 6} 1 Y 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 mm. 181-190 Ay 8 7 fe Netanya ros, Male tee ee aa one 191-200 Ea tot lu 2 1 hla spall esis call a8 201-210 paral 45) 129 Liege ey 1 Fane eee Lee su 211-220 Bes ee be | TAL Eee: 8 7 RO 1K ae 221-230 eae Ab oo, AS le Reel see 1 Ses ales 9 2, aoe 231-240 Sean ea 1 Wie Mlbee Pel oe 1 soe 3 1°25 | 38 a2 8 Gale 241-250 Se Ae MC actin abicts er 1 ead etre ete 2>| 225ml S ial ales 8 6 ] 251-260 gist dla woke: laremrtal|y aie. glee ||| “epresill® tateias| pucenn |e osaisen | aici lite | Al : . 106 be 70) {peta 1 2 |. | 14>] 13:1 50! | 76. Sao 1 JUNE. SEPTEMBER. mm. mm. Mean length of fish with 2 ring scales = 202 Mean length of nsh with 2 ring scales =210 99 99 3 29 = 202 99 99 3 99 = 5) 9 29 4 22 =214 2” 29 4. 29 = 232 99 ” 5* 2 = 225 29 99 5 29 = 236 ” cy) oe ” = 238 ” > 6 ° = 2837) i, 53 Te 3 = 238 9? 9 8 9 = 240 99 29 g* 99 = 245 * | example. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 127 ON IRREGULARITIES IN SEA-TEMPERATURE DUE TO TIDAL OSCILLATORY STREAMS. By R. J. Dantet, B.Sc. It has been suggested by Professor D’Arcy Thompson* that the annual temperature variation, at a fixed position in the sea, can be represented by a Fourier Series. There ought to be one principal component in such a series, and this ought to account for the greater part of the variation above and below the annual mean temperature. Then there ought to be other components of 4,4,4, and so on, of a whole year, each of which also accounts for some of the variation from the mean annual value. Some, of course, of these minor components may be expected to have small amplitudes; so small that they may be neglected. An harmonic analysis of the annual temperature fluctuation, at any fixed position, ought, therefore, to give us a series of equations, each of which will represent an harmonic oscillation, and the phase and amplitude of each oscillation would be given by the analysis. If, then, the various components be added algebraically the summation ought to reproduce the observed annual temperature oscillation. Of course, in making such an analysis, we ought to assume the periods of the various components and then evaluate their phases and amplitudes. That supposes a theory (or explanation, rather) of the causes of variation in sea-tempera- ture. Obviously the principal cause is the annual change of declination of the sun. In the case investigated in this paper the other causes are tidal oscillatory streams, by means of which heat is transferred from the sea to the land, or wice versa. These oscillations are assumed to have (1) a semilunar period (the neap and spring tides), and (2) a semi-annual period * Rept. II Northern area, North Sea Fisheries Investigations, cd. 3358, 1907, p. 185. 128 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. (equinoctial tides). An annual sea-temperature oscillation ought, then, to decompose into three component oscillations :— (1) Annual; (2) Six-monthly; (3) Fortnightly. On adding, algebraically, these three oscillations there should result one that is very similar to the observed oscillation. There ought, of course, to be a “ residue ” unaccounted for by the analysis. The explanation, it has been said, assumes that heat is transferred between the sea-position investigated and the adjacent land by means of tidal oscillatory streams, and it is easy to see that this must be the case. In winter the extensive sand-banks, uncovered by the ebb-tide, lose heat by radiation and evaporation, so that they become colder than the sea-water that flows over them at next flood-tide: therefore, that water is cooled, and when it ebbs out seawards to the sea-position under investigation it dilutes the warmer water there by colder water. A reversal of these conditions occurs in the summer months. The question presented itself: could the annual tempera- ture oscillation, at a pomt in mid-channel in the Irish Sea, be subjected to Fourier analysis so as to bring out the three periodic oscillations mentioned above and then leave a residue . which might be traced to other periodic or unperiodic causes. It is probable that Fourier analysis is not theoretically justi- fiable, for the method assumes that the function (the annual sea-temperature oscillation at a fixed station) is periodic—that is, repeats itself exactly from year to year. But it does not; and there are quite well-marked variations in (1) the dates of maxima, mimima and means, and (2) amplitude from year to year. These may, of course, be due to an oscillation, the period of which is a number of years, but about that we do not know yet. Anyhow, it appears to be worth while to look for the existence of a fortnightly component of sea-temperature oscillation before plunging into Fourier analysis. This is the SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 129 object. of the present investigation. And it is obvious that we must know all the principal causes of variation of sea- temperature before we can, with confidence, say that the difference between one year and another is due to, say, a greater or lesser influx of Atlantic water into the area in question. A series of readings of daily sea-temperature at certain hight vessels in the Irish Sea have been given to us by the Meteorological Office: at present we deal with the period 1907-12, 1914. The temperatures for January, 1915, are also considered, after which month the records cease for the rest of the war period. Chiefly, three light vessels are in question :— ‘Morecambe Bay: Lat. 53° 54’ N.; Long. 3° 31’ W. Bahama Bank: Lat. 54° 20’ N.; Long. 4° 13’ W. Carnarvon Bay: Lat. 53° 06’ N.; Long. 4° 49’ W. Carn aryo : SoC Fic. 2. lLightships and hydrographic stations. 130 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Bahama Bank Ship and Carnarvon Bay Ship I consider to be “ open-sea ”? stations, which are much less under the influence of the land than is Morecambe Bay Lightship. This is about 16 miles distant from the mouth of Morecambe Bay,and the run of the tidal streams is such as to transport water from the Bay to the region between the Bahama Bank and the More- came Bay light vessels. Therefore, the sea-region about the latter position has a greater range of temperature than at either Bahama Bank or at the middle of Carnarvon Bay. It is to the influence of the land that we look for the explanation of this greater range. Now the greatest differences of tem- perature between sea and land are experienced during the months January to March and June to September, and so we find it advantageous to use either or both of these periods in making comparisons between the various stations. Two temperature readings are taken each day at the light vessels—at sunrise and at 4 pm. It is the latter readings that are taken into consideration here: the fact that they are made at continually varying states of the tide 1s a condition that may be neglected, as we shall see later. The readings are Fahrenheit ones, but they have been converted into the . corresponding Centigrade values. The daily temperatures for the months January to March are grouped in periods of ten days, and means are calculated. These means are then plotted at the centres of the periods: thus, the mean for January Ist-10th, 1907, is 6-27°C., and this figure is plotted against January 5th. The ten-daily points are then found, and a smoothly-running curve is drawn through or among them. Mean temperatures for any day are found from this curve. eS If these smoothed curves are drawn for the first three months of each of the years considerable differences will be found. Thus, in January-March, 1912, there is 2 comparatively great range, which is about 7° C. at the beginning of January SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 131 and the end of March, and which is minimal at 4:7°. Such a curve cuts through those of years when the range is less. When these smoothed curves for Bahama Bank and More- cambe Bay light vessels are compared it is seen that their general appearance, with respect to each other, are the same, on the whole; and this is so even when the curves from the same one light vessel, in different years, may be very different. The Bahama Ship temperatures are higher throughout all the years considered except 1907. In that year the temperature at Morecambe Bay Ship was minimal (4:54° C.) on Jan. 31st ; but it rose rapidly, and on February 16th it was higher than at Bahama Ship, not only so but it was higher than at Carnarvon Bay Ship, which is more southerly, and is in the core of the water streams moving from south to north, and is less affected by the influence of the land than 1s either of the other stations. The general similarity, in shape, of the curves for More- came Bay and Bahama vessels, and the higher range of the latter are to be expected when one looks at their respective positions. The latter vessel is just north of the line from Maughold Head and Walney Island, along which line the tidal streams that come through St. George’s and North Channel meet, and form an area in which there is little oscillatory ebb and flood, but a large, vertical oscillation. It has been found by study of the salinities along the Maughold Head— Walney Line (Hydrographic Stations I-III*) that this area is greatly affected by the tidal streams ebbing out from Morecambe Bay. In its eradual transference across, towards the Manx coast, this water is greatly mixed with that which comes up from St. George’s Channel because of the resultant tidal drift from south to north. This mixed water, of course, gradually passes out through the North Channel.t * Bassett, ‘“‘ Report on Hydrographic Observations,’ Ann. Rept. Lancashire Sea-Fish. Lab., 1907-14 ; Johnstone, 2bzd., 1908, p. 79. + Knudsen, Publications de Circonstance, No. 39, 1907. 132 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. While the position of Bahama Bank Vessel does not exclude this effect of the bank water (as shown by a comparison of the temperatures and salinities with those from Stations V-VII, where the conditions are such as to let the Atlantic water become a factor), the effect is much less evident than it is at Morecambe Bay Light Vessel. The cause of the variations from the simple harmonic curve in the graphs of sea-temperature at both Bahama Bank and Morecambe Bay ships may be looked for, therefore, in the local inshore conditions. One clue to the causes of these variations may be found in the various positions of the minima of sea-temperature. Thus, the differences between the dates of the minima of the smoothed curves for Bahama and Morecambe Bay Ships are shown below :— Morecambe Bahama Difference. Bay. Bank. Days GOT Sarg ieee Et atide ctates January 31 February 20 20 LOGOS Fass nsaseoseeese-pesie ss February 14 March 8 23 NUD psadancoaossoconoqoodesodde March 1 March 6 5 WMO cconcssuctodsoqoassccasse January 30 February 3 4 ID) Cond gaogncdsacestosoadance February 9 February 11 Z WON eine ew claoeaiia eee bgh es | February 9 February 4 5) LOW A rectece se aaes icicles eactsses _ January 26 January 22 t Thus, the difference in the dates at which the minima occur may be from 2 to 23 days. The years 1912 and 1914 are the only ones in which the minimum for Bahama Bank occurs before that for Morecambe Bay. There was a marked deficiency in both the air-temperature and the amount of sunshine until February 10th in 1912 and until January 24th in 1914; and apparently the temperature of the banks in Morecambe Bay, which are laid bare by the tides, cooled the offshore water and delayed the usual rise of sea-temperature in those years. 1907 and 1908 are, however, very exceptional years, for the difference in the dates of occurrence of the minima were 20 and 23 days respectively; and they are also years which SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 133 show, on the whole, the greatest differences in mean temperature at the two light vessels in question, though the exceptional nature of the conditions is not so strikingly shown as in the dates of the minima. Now it has been suggested that the general weather conditions act on the coastal strip of water between tide marks* to a much greater extent than on the water of the sea; but the change in temperature of the banks then acts on the sea (in some years, in the past, Morecambe Bay has had much ice on the banks in the winter months). This effect of the banks on the coastal sea-water is also shown by the rapid rise in sea-temperature in 1907, during February and March, when there was abundant sunshine and an air- temperature higher than the normal for this time of year. There are, however, many factors which are bound to affect the temperature of the sea in such an area as Morecambe Bay. These conditions must be very complex, and it can only be during spells of exceptional weather, when one or a few factors predominate, that it is possible to trace out connections such as we are anxious to elucidate. The heating and cooling of the sea-water in the Morecambe Bay area must, however, be largely influenced by the flowing and ebbing of the tides over about 100 square miles of sand, uncovered every twelve hours. Now, since the spring tides cover and uncover a larger area of sand-banks than do the neaps, it was thought possible that there might be a correlation between the deviations from the mean sea-temperature (as based on the ten-daily averages) and the succession of neaps and springs. Morecambe Bay Light Vessel is about 16 miles distant from the mouth of the Bay, and its position is such that it is not far from the main course of the floods and ebbs. (The tide from the north part of the Bay, however, streams north and south along Walney, and does not pass close to the ship.) There is a mass of water, however, flowing past the ship, for nine * Which is, of course, enormous in Morecambe Bay. 2 f i 134 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. miles at springs and six miles at neaps, and this water has been mixed with that which has been in contact with the sand- banks. That this is so (that the influence of the tide streaming off the sand-banks is indirect at the ship) is shown by the fact that there is no evident connection between the sea- temperature at the ship and the state of the tide, whether aunsUusae nny, Februar March Fic. 3. Temperature and tidal variations in January-March, 1907, Morecambe Bay Light Vessel. flowing or ebbing. There would be such a connection if the influence of the banks on the ship were immediate and direct. So one can use the daily, 4 p.m., observations of temperature, even though the latter are taken at all states of the tide. In applying these suggestions, the period January to SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 135 March has been taken, and, first of all, the data for separate years have been considered : we begin with 1907. The heights of the tide at high water at Liverpool—which is the nearest standard port—are plotted for the p.m. tides of each day, thus we obtain a curve, the maxima of which represent springs and the minima neaps. This curve is drawn as the dotted line in Fig. 3 and the straight line marked 0°C. may be taken as representing mean sea-level at high water for the period in question. ‘To compare the deviations from the mean level at high water with the temperature variations we have next to find the smoothed ten-daily temperature, and it is assumed that in taking the means of overlapping groups of ten days the smaller deviations of temperature, due to tidal causes, are smoothed out. The straight line, “ 0° C.” in Fig. 3, then represents the temperature graph as deduced from the ten-daily smoothed averages, only it is straightened out, so to speak, because all that we want to find is the deviations of temperature from this smoothed value. The smoothed temperature values are read off directly from a graph, and then the differences between these and the actually-observed daily temperatures are taken. These actual daily temperatures run rather irregularly, and so I have taken three daily averages: this gets rid of some of the more violent irregularities, but ought not to hide the variations due to the influence of the tides. Thus, the value for January 2nd, for instance, is taken as the mean of three days January Ist to 3rd, and it is plotted agamst the date January 2nd. The difference between the smoothed mean ten-daily temperature and the mean three-daily temperature can now be found by adding or subtracting, as the case may be. The former series 1s represented by a straight line and the latter is represented by a graph, which runs above and sinks below this straight line. It will be seen that there is a rather striking similarity between the fluctuations of temperature and the 136 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. fluctuations in the height of high water at Liverpool*: the former range between about 0-5° C. above and 1-33° C. below the mean line. This is extraordinary when one assumes that the differences are due, apparently, to the different areas of banks covered by the tides at neaps and springs. One thing, however, must be noticed: for approximately the first half of the period the mean temperature for Morecambe Bay Light- ship is below that at Bahama Bank. The foreshore in More- . cambe Bay must therefore be exercising a cooling effect since the influence of the sand-banks must be greater at the former position than at the latter. We should expect, then, that each high-water maximum would be opposed by a temperature minimum, whereas the reverse condition is shown by the graph. There is bound, however, to be a lag in the change of tempera- ture, because it will take some time for the effect produced inshore to be felt at the lightship. The second part of the smoothed curves show that the foreshore is now warming the water offshore, and the temperature fluctuations produced by the tides and disclosed by the three-daily averages now corre- spond directly to the curve of high-water levels—so there is apparently no lag. That is, there is a complete reversal of the — relative position of the fluctuations at the two lightships, and yet the periodicity of rhythm of the three-daily temperature fluctuations is apparently undisturbed. In spite of this apparent anomaly we must, however, correlate the changes in tidal level with the temperature fluctuations, though we must not expect a very high degree of correlation since the rate at which heat is transferred to and from the foreshore must depend on other conditions, such as the winds. If the temperatures for January to March, 1908, be treated in the same way a similar rhythmic fluctuation is shown. But this is not so regular as in the case of 1907. The maxima * The difference between the times of high water at Liverpool and Morecambe Bay is only about ten minutes. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 137 and minima follow each other as before, the former lagging from three to seven days behind the maxima of high water of the same year. The correlation breaks down at one place : the maximum high water of January 20th is opposed by the lowest minimum temperature of the whole series and is suc- ceeded by a maximum which holds till January 26th. The weather reports disclose nothing that explains this anomaly ; 2i January. February, March, ig. 4. Temperature and tidal variations January-March, 1910, Morecambe Bay Light Vessel. but if the temperatures for January are compared with those of the same month at Bahama Lightship it is seen that there is a sudden and remarkable increase in the difference between the two stations, which rapidly disappears and suggests that some abnormal condition affected the Morecambe Bay tem- peratures. | I 138 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. The curve for 1909 shows fluctuations which disturb the rhythm, and when that of 1910 was examined it differed so markedly from 1907 and 1908 that it appears proper to repro- duce it here (Fig. 4). The fluctuations have a range of about 0-28° C. above and below the mean, and they are irregular so that they fit in badly with the tidal curve of the same year : thus, opposite the tidal maximum of February 12th the tem- perature fluctuation nearly disappears. Weather conditions have been discussed above, particularly in connection with the rapid and unusual rise of temperature during March, 1907, at More- cambe Bay Ship. The mildness of the early months of 1910, particularly February, are indicated in the smoothness of the ten-day average curve, which contrasts strongly with the steeper curve for the Bahama region. In examining the temperature changes from day to day, however, we are not only dealing with general conditions, but also with the particu- lar conditions for each day. In discussmg the smoothed ten-daily curves it was found that in their early months 1907 and 1908 were “ strong’ years. Whatever were the conditions on the Lancashire coast they were such that they not only caused large differences between the temperatures, day by ~ day, at the two lightships, but they actually altered the shapes of the two curves. It is during these years, therefore, that one might expect the general conditions prevailing over the ereat sand-banks to impress themselves on the temperature of the water offshore from the Bay and make minor differences. In 1910, however, the inshore conditions may not have been so marked as to do this so far out as the lightships. It is quite impossible, of course, to give due weight to all the factors concerned, but some that undoubtedly operate can be men- tioned, just to show the conditions that may hide the tidal effects. The direction of the wind, for instance, will have much influence. The winds themselves warm or chill the banks. They may cut the tide or hold it back. They may raise the tide SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 139 to more than its. normal height: thus a stiff south-west breeze south of Holyhead may cause the water on the Dock Sill at Barrow to be a foot higher than the predicted tide, and a north-east wind in the same southerly area cuts the tide in Morecambe Bay even when, in the Bay itself, light westerly breezes may be blowing. The amount of fresh water which enters the Bay is also large: thus it is estimated* that the rivers there carry down fresh water from about 1,080 square miles of the wettest part of the British Islands. The quantity of water that enters the Bay after heavy rains must alter the temperature of the adjacent sea, especially after a time of melting snow, and the volume of water setting out from the Bay must also vary from this cause. These factors may become more prominent ones in a “ weak” year. ‘These minor conditions are, to a great extent, incalculable ones, and if a long series of years were considered, and com- bined in some way, the irregularities that disturb the tidal rhythm ought to “cancel out.” With this idea in mind all the data available have been treated in the following way :— One tidal graph must be made from all the years. Now the times of high water vary from year to year, but we can take the graph of high waters for 1907 and superpose the similar graphs for the other years upon this by shifting the latter backwards or forwards until the maxima and minima nearly coincide. Unfortunately, the method is complicated by the fact that springs and neaps do not occur with the same intervals in different years, and it is therefore necessary to compare the dates of the highest springs and the lowest neaps throughout, say, January to March for every year in order to find the actual difference in days between the maxima and minima of 1907 and those of other years. If the average of these differences is obtained then one can make the closest fit for the high-water curve of each year with that of 1907. * Report of British Rainfall Organisation for 1910. 140 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. The fit will not be exact, but the difference will not usually exceed one or two days. The following precautions are necessary in regard to the temperatures before the composite high-water curve can be used. By comparing the daily readings taken from the ten-daily curves the average daily rate of change of temperature can be found. Thus, corrections can be made. Suppose that it is required to apply the graph of high waters for 1908 to that of 1907. It was found that, m order to get the best fit, the whole graph for 1908 had to be moved forward by four days: thus, January 6th of 1908 will coincide with January 2nd of 1907. Then we see, from the ten-daily average charts that the average temperature for seven years, for January 2nd, is higher than that for January 6th by 033° C., and so this amount has to be added to the value taken for January 6th, 1908. Hach daily temperature must, of course, be altered likewise before 1908 can be compared with 1907 and its tidal graph. The same method was applied to each of the years, and the daily corrections were applied to the particular readings. The corrected values for each day were then added up and daily average fluctuations were thus obtained for the years 1907-12 and 1914. These were smoothed by taking three-daily averages, and the results were applied to the high-water graph just as in the case of the individual years. The result seems to be satisfactory, though the effect of the resultant fluctuations is toned down, so to speak, and the greater part of the range is no more than 0:28° C. above or below the mean line. But in outlne the graph of composite fluctuations follows that of 1907 so closely that one must look on it with some suspicion. If the year 1907 is omitted and the com- bination of all the others is tried the result is very different. This curve for 1908-12 and 1914 shows little variation from January Ist-5th. In February and March there are signs of the same regular succession of maxima and minima that are SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 14] shown by 1907, but the general effect is not convincing. What the graph suggests is a possibility rather than a complete demonstration. If the one poor year, 1910, is taken out there is still no essential alteration. Therefore we see that 1907 exhibits so remarkable and characteristic a succession of maxima and minima as to impress itself on the combined temperature curves of the six following years. The daily fluctuations in temperature for the months June to September for the same years have also been examined. The smoothed curve plotted from the ten-daily averages for the summer of 1907 (the year in which the January-March tidal periodicity of temperature is so plain) rises sharply from 11-:17° C. to a maximum of 17°44°C. on July 27-28th, and it falls again as rapidly. The slope of the corresponding curve for 1910 is less, and the maximum is 15°6° C. on August 4th. If the daily temperatures for the summer 1907 at More- cambe Bay Ship be treated in the same way as in the case of the earlier months there is, it is true, a marked fluctuation above and below the mean line. Minor and irregular fluctua- tions are more noticeable in the summer months, as might be expected since, at this period, the air-temperature and solar radiation act with greater effect on the surface water and so bring about bigger fluctuations.* The curve, made as before, shows tidal maxima on June 11th, August 10th, September 8th and September 22nd. These are opposed to minima of temperature, which is the condition one expects. The spring-tide maxima on June 26th, July 11th and August 23rd, however, occur against parts of the temperature curve, which are equivocal as regards the occurrence of maxima or minima. The summer of the year 1907, then, does not fulfil the promise of its spring. The whole series of years 1907-12 and 1914 were next * See Robertson, ‘“‘ Observations of North Sea Surface Temperatures and Salinities, 1904-5,’ North Sea Fisheries Investigations Committee Rept. II (Northern Area), cd. 3358, 1907, p. 155. 142 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. thrown together in the same way, as has been indicated above, for the period January-March. The temperature fluctuations so obtained are not so well marked as they are in single years, but the maxima and minima fit much better to the tidal fluctuations with the exception of the period about August 24th, when there is no very evident maximum to correspond to the spring tides of that date. There are indications that this summer rhythm is not due to any one particular year, as in the case of the spring series of data. Average Temperatures C.° for Ten-Day Periods. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. Bay Lnghtship 4 p.m. Surface Observations, January-March 1907-12, 1914. TABLE I. 143 Morecambe ) January February March 1-10 | 11-20 | 21-30| 31-9 | 10-19 | 20-1 | 2-11 | 12-21 | 29-31 iC ieee 6-27] 5:88| 438] 4-59] 5-22| 611 7-28! 7-88] 8-99 ic ae 5-45| 4-76| 4:59| 5-17| 4:86] 5-06| 4-76] 5-28] 5-34 HOG! scsucs: 6-77| 5:66| 4-54| 4-70] 4:38] 4-10] 3-54] 4-65| 5-28 oe 5-34| 5-12| 4-32] 465] 4-70] 5-22] 5-28] 5-66! 6-77 feta. 6:32] 5:55| 5-72] 5-00| 534] 605] 638| 5-82] 6-05 ak. 6-67| 6-61] 5-93| 4-70| 4-70] 5-51] 5-99| 7-00] 7-11 Mie a. 6-05] 534] 5-00] 6-05) 6-38] 632] 6-43] 6-61| 7-06 es. RO Gas | come we Ak ce | sd A. hee PRGpale vcs tkes 50-15 | 45-30 | 39-70 | 34-86 | 35 58 | 38-37 | 39-66 | 42-90 | 46-60 Average ......... 6-27| 5-66] 4-96| 4-98] 5-08| 5-48| 5-671 6-13| 6-66 Average Temperatures C.° for Ten-Day Periods. Morecambe Bay Lightship 4 p.m. Surface Observations, June-September, 1907-12, 1914: June July 1-10 11-20 21-30 1-10 11-20 21-30 BOOTS. oases! 11-22 13-12 13-23 14-44 15-94 17-89 TOUS acc e. 13-06 12-66 15-43 16-26 15-43 15-66 LS Seta 11-50 12-16 13-18 14-32 14-21 14-04 EOLOE a. 3s. . 11-67 13-33 14-26 14-32 15-60 15-32 LOT teat 0.< 14-82 14-09 13-60 15-00 16-32 17-73 ROE genes ca 13-38 13-60 13-83 15-43 16-38 16-11 BONA: rec ctes 11-55 13-99 15-00 15:77 16-77 16-05 Papal 2. a. 87-20 92-95 98-53 105-54 110-65 112-80 Average ...| 12-46 13-28 14-08 15-08 15-81 16-11 August September 31-9 10-19 20-29 30-8 9-18 19-28 BO To asso: 16-72 16-61 15-16 14-65 15-00 15-38 MOOS rec ..<2s 16-11 15-88 15-60 14-60 14-09 13-99 Jie UM Reena 15-43 15-94 15-55 14-65 14-26 13-49 ESTO Ave 15-55 16-11 15-55 14-94 14-88 14-49 BE ote: 17-89 19-00 17 83 17-56 16-94 15-32 Dinca Se 15-10 14-71 14-54 14-15 13-55 13-28 Oe aes 16-16 17-28 17-22 17-94 16:16 | 14-60 Total. .sves 112-96 115-53 111-45 108-49 104-88 100-55 Average ...| 16-14 16-50 15-92 15-50 14-98 14-36 144 TABLE IT. TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Number of days that are to be added to, or subtracted from, the dates on wha spring and neap tides occur at Liverpool in order that the years 1908-14 may be superposable on 1907 (January-March). ] 1907. 1908. 1909. 1910. 1911. water. Diff. Diff. Diff. Diff. Date. Date from Date from Date. from Date. from 1907. 1907. 1907. 19 Days. Days. Days Days SS Jan 2 | Jan 5| 3 Jan ~ S76 4 Decis2s ee Jan os | _ aes: a Siaces 13 5 > 16-17 8:5 | Jan. 5-6 | 2-5 - 9 1g Max. -...-: »» 15-16 ie 20 4:5 a 24 8-5 39 13 2-5 53 16 0-5 | _ ern > DBee | iss 28 | 4:5 x aba a-5 45 20 | os $9 25 | 1s Lee We 6 4 Be 26 7 + 30 3 WEG acne kes ss ll we Uy 1 Aug. 2 9 Aug, -5 6 VEIN | atisicwsses a Lite al ese 20 | 2 55 LOAeEs 3 14| 4 ieee Dalicice «5 = 23 a 2g, 4 de 16 a “3 21 2 MESS Sits 02%. Sepia, 1 | Sept... 5¢) 4 » 20 7 99 29 | 3 Wax. acden ties s es 10 2 ay 31 8 Sept. 4 4. I Meiece gens 5 Gales PSs) 2 Sept. 8] 8 95 13 | 3 IEE at ain'sidionn cos os BD | 35 26 | 4 i Lea eae le 5 19+ (423 Av. Diff. from 1907 ...... 3-06 days 7:7 days 3°44 days Av. Diff. from 1907 in nearest whole days ... 3 days 8 days 3 days 1907. 1911 1912 1914. High water. . Diff. Diff. Diff. Date. Date from Date. from Date from 1907. 1907. 1907. Days. | Days Days Mine) | resdes <0 June 4|June 4] 0 June 8! 4 dune...) 43 MGS! csaees ta a: aE leis Ly eel ms LF) 6 5 8 | 3 VDT seis “A 19, 20} 1 $3 23 4 43 16] 3 MAE sete. es 2h | as 2 Wea 33 29 |, *3 3 27 |—1 AMBP Fe era's July 4] July 5] 1 July <9%| 5 July 2| 2 VES 2 Lacie tone - | ees ie 0 Re Leo) 6 -, Di 52, MEMS <2 sass a 1 hes 20) | (I - 23.| 4 ie Ish iacl Matias occ eeu: bs Bt |. 54 26 | 1 = 29 |.4 Sy 27 |—2 MIS Ti nase see: Aus 2 Ang.) bP 2 AOS Me Os Aug. 7 Eo) FE Maser. 2) a 1 aia 10 |-1 - iSie 2 . Se 1 ge ee 5 ori s. TOP a ¥ 22) 4 - 16; 2 Maree o caigec | 9 OT as 24} 1 oe 28-5 3 22 | 1 1 ie Sept. 1 | Sept. 2 1 Sept. 5 4 = 30 2 WEEE He a dels eS Sule. Sorel oe be: Sept. ~ dial is See eer Za UGa l=» 53 Ui linel “ EO) ccs 53 14 | 2 Maik) eo eeiny.: * ea gee 2a | ul 3 20h 33 i 22! 0 Ay. Dit from 1907 «23... 1-0 days 4-2 days Av. Diff. from 1907 in nearest whole days ... 1 day 4 days 1 day 146 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. SEASONAL CHANGES IN THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF THE MUSSEL (MYTILUS EDULIS). By R. J. Dantez, B.Sc. Introduction. The paper is a preliminary notice of an investigation, at present incomplete, into the seasonal variations in the com- position of flesh of the common mussel {Mytilus edulis) from samples obtained on the mussel-beds of Morecambe, Lanca- shire. Since the methods of dealing with the samples obtained are all-important in such work, it is this aspect which is dealt with below. It is intended in the full report to include also an account of the structure of the mussel. Although much work has been done in this direction, notably by Sabatier* on Mytilus edulis itself, and by List? on closely-allied species, there seems room for a further description of this mollusc. The positions of the Morecambe mussel-beds are well shown in Chart IT, Report of the Lancashire Sea-Fisheries Laboratory, 1912, as they were then. With one exception the samples have been obtained from an area surrounding the two “ gunnels,” or channels, which connect the Grange Channel with Heysham Lake; it is mainly from these skears that mussels are consigned for food, several of the samples dealt with being taken from bags already packed for sale. The importance of this fishery at Morecambe may be shown by the fact that during the years 1900-1904, 7,838 tons of mussels were removed from the beds, the value yielded in any one year amounting to as much as £2,000. The first sample was received on May 21st, 1920, and since then other samples have been forwarded at mtervals of approximately three weeks, by Mr. Edward Gardner, Honorary Bailiff to the Lancashire and Western Sea-Fisheries Committee, to whose kindly assistance I am greatly indebted. The samples vary from 16-39 mussels, and are always * Sabatier, Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 1877, Series 6, v., page 1. t List, **‘ Die Mytiliden ” Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel, xxvii, 1902. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 147 despatched to Liverpool the same way, through the post in tins. They usually arrive in good condition, with the valves of the shells tightly closed. Method of dealing with samples. The outsides of the mussel-shells are first freed from barnacles and any foreign matter, washed under the tap, and dried with a towel. The mussels are prised open with a pair of forceps, and a small wooden peg placed between the valves to prevent them from reclosing. After shaking to get rid of any water which may be lodged in the mantle cavity, the mussels are reared up in small racks, with the posterior end of the shell resting on a sheet of blotting paper; the latter absorbs any mucus or excreta that may drain away. It is necessary to open the shells carefully, because if the flesh is punctured, blood and liquid flows from the animal itself. The draining is continued until a dry glaze begins to show on the surface of the flesh, a process which generally takes a little over two hours. Six mussels are then chosen at random and placed on one side for special examination. The remaining mussels in the sample, with their shells, are weighed in bulk, and after the soft parts are removed, the shells alone are weighed. The difference, of course, gives the wet weight of the soft parts. In all cases the byssus threads are weighed in with the shells. It is from this latter part of the sample that mussels are obtained for sectioning to show the distribution of fat im the tissue. The six mussels taken from the sample are each weighed in their shells separately on a balance. The soft contents are then scraped with care, by means of a scalpel, to a small porcelain dish which has been previously dried and weighed. The cleaned shell with any byssus threads are also weighed separately, and it is then possible, by subtracting such weights from those of the mussels with shells, to obtain the wet weight of the flesh in the basin. This gives a more accurate result than weighing the basin and flesh direct, because the removal 148 TRANSACTIONS: LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. of the beasts from their shells takes time, and evaporation is constantly going on. The basin and its contents are then placed in an electric oven at 105° C. and dried until a constant weight is obtained. It is probable that all the water is not removed by this method, since the mussels become covered with a hard, impermeable skin. From the differences of wet and dry weights the amount of water in the tissue is obtained. The dried mussels are powdered in a mortar and stored in small bottles. It is from this powder that the percentages of fat and proteim are cal- culated, two or three samples being run through together. The following example is given to show the method of tabulating the observations :— : OcToBER 29TH, 1920. Sample of 19 mussels taken from the Little Out Skear, close to the Gunnel through into Heysham Lake. Weight Weight No. Length. Total weight with shell. of of shell. flesh. em. orammes. grammes. | grammes. 1 6-55 20-300 10-790 9-510 2 6:00 15-997 9-206 6-791 3 6-80 18-598 9-821 8 7aT + 5-95 16-721 8-557 8-164 5 6-15 15-044. 7-746 7-298 6 6-80 Av. 6-375 19-035 10-487 8-548 7 6-20 Totals 105-695 56-607 49-088 8 6-30 Averages 17-616 9-435 8-181 9 6-55 ae —— 10 6-80 1] 6-25 12 6-15 13 6-40 Weight 7-19 . 245:04 | 124-575 120-465 14 6-95 15 6-35 Average 18-850 9-580 9-270 16 6-70 17 5:95 Difference in averages 1-234 0-145 1-089 18 5-90 19 6-25 Av. 6-365 The difference in the averages of 1-6 and 7 to 19 in this case are extreme when compared with most of the other samples. akg SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 149 The Shell. The length of each shell is found in ems., the measurement bemg from the umbo to the extreme rounded portion of the posterior edge. The shell is composed mainly of carbonate of lime ; there is no trace of phosphate of lime. Iron is present and seems to be connected with the blue colour of the shell. This colour in mussel-shells is not uncommonly segregated into stripes and bands, the remainder of the shell in such cases bemg practically colourless. Pieces of shell with little colour give feeble reactions when tested for iron, whereas the coloured portions give very decided reactions. The shell also gives the destructive flame reaction for strontium, and since this suggests one of the ultimate destinations of strontium brought down by rivers and streams, it will be interesting to examine other molluse shells, and calcareous alge, to ascertain whether its presence in these is general. Shells with the periostracum have been taken from each sample and powdered in an iron pestle and mortar. After obtaining the water content by weighing powder before and after drying, the samples have been stored, and now await quantitative estimation of carbonate of lime and iron to see if there are any significant changes in the percentages through- out the samples. Estimation of Fats. In the estimation of fats, 0-5 to 1 gramme of the powdered mussel-flesh was taken from each sample and the extraction carried out in a Soxhlet apparatus, carbon tetrachloride being used as solvent. Whatman’s fat-free extraction thimbles were used, and these were cut down, so that when fitted into a numbered weighing bottle, the lid of the latter could be replaced in position. By excluding air as much as possible in this way, subsequent weighings were done with greater ease and accuracy. The weighing bottle contamig a cut-down thimble, a plug of cotton wool, and also a Swedish filter paper, was first 150 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. dried and weighed, the date of the sample having been written in pencil on the thimble to avoid confusion. Mussel powder was wrapped carefully in the filter paper and placed in the thimble, the latter being then plugged by the cotton wool. It was found in practice that this method prevented a passing over of the powder itself during the extraction. The weighing bottle, with its contents, was placed in the oven, and once a constant weight was obtained the amount of powder in the thimble was ascertained by subtracting the origmal weight of the bottle, etc. | To ensure as complete an extraction as possible, the Soxhlet apparatus was kept working for three or four hours, although the solvent appeared clear after the third or fourth siphoning. The thimble, with its residue, was then placed back into the weighing bottle and dried in the oven. The weight of the residue was a check upon the accuracy of the extraction, smce its weight plus that of the carbon tetrachloride extract should equal the original dry weight of the powder taken for the experiment. The error generally fell to within 0-5%, and where differences were greater, the extraction was carried out again. This system of fat extraction is not without error; other substances besides fats are probably extracted from the tissues. Moreover, there will be oxidation of some of the fat present in the powder during the heating and drying process. The propriety of estimating fats in such a manner, instead of estimating them as fatty acids, has been discussed by several writers*. The results from the above methods, however, if not strictly accurate are all obtamed under the same standard conditions ; and since this work is one of comparison rather than intensive quantitative estimation, it is sufficient for the * For papers see Hartley, J. of Physiology, 1907-8; Mottram, ibid., 1909-10; Kumagawa and Suto, Bio-chemical Zs., 1908; Tamura, zbid., 1913. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 151 purpose. Fastidious method is beside the point in an investi- gation such as this, where the errors of sampling may be very appreciable. Proteid Estimations. Kjeldhal’s method was used in estimating proteid. The amount of dried mussel powder taken was 0-5 grammes. This was placed in a long-necked flask, with 20 c.c. of strong sulphuric acid and a little sand added to stop bumping. The flask was then heated cautiously until the frothing of the material subsided. After cooling, a teaspoonful of sodium sulphate was added to increase the temperature of boiling, and a small piece of copper sulphate to assist in the oxidation. The flask was then heated vigorously for an hour or more until the contained liquid became a clear green. After diluting the liquid with distilled water, it was added to an excess of caustic soda and distilled, the ammonia evolved being collected in 75 c.c. of decinormal sulphuric acid. The titration was carried out with decinormal sodium hydrate, cochineal being used as an indicator. - Two or three samples were estimated at one time, a blank experiment having first been made to calculate the error. In order to obtain the percentages of proteid given below the Kjeldhal nitrogen values have been multiplied by the factor 6-25. This number has been used quite provisionally. There is evidence from experiment that the factor ought to be higher so far as the mussel is concerned, but since this part of the work is incomplete, the more commonly accepted factor has been used m the meantime. The proteid values given at any rate show the tendency of the changes throughout the _ season. Estimation of Carbohydrates. The large quantities of glycogen found in the mussel render it highly desirable to obtain some method of estimation which will give a sufficient degree of accuracy. 152 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Untortunately, direct method of estimation of glycogen, such as Pfluger’s well-known short method, or Fraenkel’s extraction with trichloracetic acid, are hardly applicable in this case. Results thus obtained would be untrustworthy, because the mussels have to travel under adverse conditions for twelve hours or more, and probably during this period some of the glycogen is converted into glucose by enzyme action. Mussels required for sectioning and staining for glycogen have been obtained by having them placed into absolute alcohol immediately upon gathering from the beds, but this system could not be extended very well to the estimation of amounts of glycogen, because the original weight of the flesh treated would not be known. Inverting the whole of the glycogen into glucose by keeping mussels several days in chloroform vapour, and estimating the glucose by reduction of Fehling’s solution has also been tried. It is dangerous, however, to adopt any method which has not been thoroughly tested, and to do this one requires to work near the mussel-beds and thus obtain fresh material. Since circumstances up to the present have not allowed of such a procedure, the carbohydrates in the meantime have been given as the difference on the other percentages. One pomt of interest which arose from the above work is the small amount of trouble with which comparatively large quantities of glycogen may be got from mussels, and it is suggested as an easy and profitable source for obtaining the substance for use in laboratories. The following experiment is given in some detail to show the manner in which mussels were dealt with for this purpose. A number of mussels In poor condition, and therefore likely to give minimal returns, were procured from the Wallasey beds in the River Mersey on January 25th, 1921. Thirty-three of the mussels were dealt with an hour or two after gathering. The shells were wedged open, and aiter SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 153 shaking to get rid of any sea-water, the posterior adductor, or large muscle, was cut, and the flesh scraped into a weighed 1,000 c.c. flask, through a glass funnel. While passing slowly through the funnel the mussels were minced up with the blade of a scalpel. The wet weight of this mass was found to be 337-9 grammes. Two hundred and thirty-two c.c. of 60% caustic potash was introduced into the flask, a reflux condenser fitted, and the whole heated on a water bath for three hours. At the end of this time the tissue was broken down in a most thorough manner. After cooling, the contents of the 1,000 c.c. flask was transferred to a tall measuring glass and touched the 560 c.c. mark. The mixture was then diluted with water until the total amount of liquid and tissue came to 1,400 c.c. After stirrmg well with a glass rod, the mouth of the measuring glass was covered with a petrie dish and the sediment left to settle. This took place in about twenty-four hours, the residue at the bottom measuring up to 170 c.c. A siphon tube was then placed under the soapy film which had formed on the surface of the liquid, and the clear part of the latter siphoned off from above the sediment into a tall, glass vessel capable of holding 3,000 ¢.c. This method of siphoning, while allowing a small quantity of glycogen to remain behind in the measuring glass, saves a good deal of trouble in the subsequent filterings. The glycogen was precipitated from the liquid thus obtained by adding twice its volume of 95% alcohol. The precipitate was allowed to settle and the liquid then decanted off through a filter paper, contained in a glass funnel, and fitted with a supporting metal cone. The filtration was hastened by the use of a filter pump. The glycogen was then washed by shaking with a little fresh alcohol and run on to the same filter paper. To cleanse the glycogen more thoroughly, it was dissolved by running boiling water through the paper, and the opalescent liquid thus formed received into a fresh K 154 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. flask. The bulk of water was reduced by heating on the water bath, cooled, and the glycogen again precipitated with alcohol and filtered on to a fresh weighed filter paper. It only remained to give a final washing with ether, and dry the glycogen on the paper at 100°C. The quantity of alcohol used is large, but easily recoverable in a still. The subsequent weighing gave a yield of six grammes of glycogen. The actual amount of time taken during the operation was not great, since the periods required for the sediment and glycogen to settle may be employed in other work. The manner m which the mussel tissue breaks down helps the process considerably, and the haste required in obtaming glycogen for stance from mammalian livers, where inversion takes place immediately after death, is not necessary. The only supply of mussels available for many laboratories, however, will be those obtained from local shops, where they may have laneuished for two or three days. Therefore, in order to effect a comparison with the fresh sample, a second lot of thirty-three mussels were kept until midday of January 29th or4days. By this time most of the shells were gaping, and the animals contaied had a flaccid appearance although still able to show some little signs of movement. The weight of flesh was less than in the first sample owing to the slow evaporation of the water contents. The same procedure was gone through as in the fresh mussels, and the amount of glycogen obtaimed was 4-422 grammes, approximately two-thirds of the first amount, but still m sufficient quantities to show that as a cheap and easily-handled source of glycogen, the common mussel is worthy of consideration. Estimation of Ash. . To obtaim the non-volatile mineral matter, about 0-5 erammes of dried powder was incinerated in a silica crucible. After half an hour of heating to a dull red, the substance was cooled and one or two drops of strong nitric acid added. The SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 155 heating was then continued over a fierce flame until a white ash was produced. This residue, besides containing inorganic matter from the tissue itself probably also includes a certain amount of salt, deposited on the surface of the flesh by the sea-water during the drying process, and also the sand and mud lying in the gut of the animals. Since the amount of the latter depends upon the vigour with which the animal was feeding when caught, it is a variable quantity which is indepen- dent of the actual body metabolism. The percentages have therefore been reckoned on the wet ash free substance. This does not make much difference so far as the fat and proteid percentages are concerned, but alters the carbohydrate values im some cases, since these are obtained by difference. The percentage results are given below without comment since the work is still proceeding :— Morecambe Mussels. Percentages based on Wet Ash Free Substance. Proteid % Carbohydrate Date. Water %. Oil %: N X 6-25. we (by difference). May (20 *- 258.3. 86-610 0-629 8-261 4-499 wune LO... 86-440 0-525 8-647 4-388 PU Oe boeken 85-884 0-867 8-791 4-458 BAL SER eee 81-321 1-267 10-960 6-452 I DOT veces e's 79-103 1-484 11-859 7-554 Sept: 13 cece 77-867 1-516 12-681 7-936 OCt es Bice cecaees 81-797 1-277 9-939 6-987 Ao OL separ 80-534 1-454 11-228 6-784 NOV, 25 .csceses 81-878 1-678 10-960 5-484 Deer UT \es..0023: 83-926 1-160 9-286 5-628 *In this sample the wet weight was obtained from the flesh after removal from shell into dish, and not by difference of total weight—weight of shell. centages are affected accordingly. The water contents therefore should be higher, and other per- _ From the September sample onwards, transverse sections have been cut through the region of the liver, with a view to 156 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. ascertaining the position of fat and glycogen in the tissues, and tracing any changes which may occur. The following technique has been adopted :— Fat: (a) Tissue fixed in 4°% Formaline; frozen sections cut and stained with Sudan IIT; mounted in glycerine jelly. (6) Fixative 10% potassium bichromate and glacial acetic; paraffin sections stained with Sudan III and Delafield’s haema- toxylin.* Glycogen: Fixative absolute alcohol; wax sections stained with Lugol’s solution and mounted in~ xylol balsam. * See Bell, J. of Pathology, No. 1, XIX, 1914 SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 157 AN INTENSIVE STUDY OF THE MARINE PLANKTON AROUND THE SOUTH END OF THE ISLE OF MAN.—PART XIII. By W. A. Herpman, F.R.S., ANDREW Scort, A.L.S., and H. Maset Lewis, B.A. Once again, from the pressure of other work, it has been found impossible to undertake that general summary of our accumulated data and re-consideration of our previous reports which was promised. We can deal now, as before, only with the observations and results of the past year—and these, moreover, only in brief form in deference to the demand for economy in printing. The work during 1920 was carried on in exactly the same manner as In previous years, and 573 samples of plankton were collected in the neighbourhood of Port Erin, and have since been worked up in detail. These bring the total number of samples for the 14 years’ work, since 1907, up to 7,071. In addition to an average of six gatherings per week throughout the year in Port Erin Bay, in the specially important months of March, April, July, August and September special hauls were taken both in the bay and outside in the open sea from the motor-boat “ Redwing.” The results have been treated in the usual way, and the forms, lists, tables and graphs are stored available for future reference in the Oceanographic Department of the University ; where also the accumulated collections of plankton catches are housed. A special investi- gation undertaken by one of us (W.A.H.) from the “ Redwing ” on the variation observed in successive vertical hauls is dealt with as a separate paper in this Report (p. 161). The following is only to be regarded as a summary of the outstanding facts of the year 1920. The vernal plankton maximum was again in May, and the 158 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. largest individual catch was 101-7 c.c. on May 17th. The monthly average catch rises from 3-8 c.c. in January, through 9-8 c.c. in April, to 45:3 c.c. in May, and then falls to 31-6 in June, 12-2 ¢.c. n August, 19-6 c.c. m September (due to the Copepod maximum) down to the winter minimum 2-4 ¢.c. m December. The Diatoms taken by themselves form the usual double crested curve with a greater maximum im May, a summer minimum in August, a second lower maximum in September and the winter minimum in December. The monthly average for May was over 21 millions (much greater than in 1919) and in September nearly 14 millions. The largest single catch of Diatoms was 66,168,350 on May 24th. These numbers are more like those of 1918 than of 1919, when the Diatom catches were unusually small. The Dinoflagellate maximum was in June, when the monthly average was 184,000. It had risen from about 5,000 in January, and fell to a minimum of 1,463 in October. There was no marked second rise. The largest smgle haul of Dino- flagellates was 617,900 on June 3rd, mainly composed of Ceratuwm trupos, but the largest haul of Peridinaum (152,000) was also on the same date—much earlier than in 1919. The highest monthly average for the Copepoda (both Nauplii and adults) was in September (74,328 adults and 86,956 Naupli)—much later than last year—and the largest individual catch was 192,510 on September 27th. The monthly maxima are this year in their normal order—Diatoms first, then Dinoflagellates and lastly Copepoda. The great spring increase In Diatoms was late in appearing, but once it did appear was in abundance. | Taking our usual seven dominant genera of Diatoms in detail we find from the monthly averages that, as last yeaz, Biddulphia and Coscimodiscus have their spring maxima in March, while Rhizzosolenia is earlier than usual with its maximum in May along with Chaetoceras, Thalassiosira and Lauderia. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 159 The greatest Diatom catches are as follows :— Coscinodiscus = 225,630 on March 22nd. Biddulphia == 580,000 on April 20th. Lauderva = 1,140,000 on May 11th. Thalassioswa = 1,890,000 on May 17th. Chaetoceras 10,741,000 on May 17th (5,967,000 on September 23rd). Rhizosolena = 64,295,000 on May 24th. Guinardia = 1,036,000 on June 14th. Tn all cases this year the autumn increase is much smaller than the spring maximum. Reviewing the records of the six most abundant Copepoda shows that most of them have their maxima late this year— Acartia in June, Temora in July, Calanus and Orthona in August, Pseudocalanus in September and Paracalanus in November. The largest individual haul was 122,000 Pseudo- calanus elongatus on September 27th. There were about 98,000 Orthona on November 11th and over 10,000 Paracalanus on the same date. On the whole Copepoda were abundant later in the year than in 1919. Noctiluca was present from August on to the end of the year, but only reached about 10,000 in a haul—in contrast to over 26,000 in July last year. Kchinoderm larvae were fairly abundant, up to over 9,000, at various dates from March to September. Sagitta was most abundant in June and July, rare in other months, though a few are always present. Polychaet larvae were present throughout the year, but most abundant in the early months, up to 56,000 on March 4th. Molluscan larvae, both Gastropod and Lamellibranch, have also much the same dis- tribution, but only reach the thousands in early spring and again in late autumn. Ovkopleura was present throughout the year, being most abundant in the warmer months and reaching 12,000 in May and 17,000 at the end of September. In most 160 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. months there were a few hundred in a haul. Rockling and other fish eggs were present from January to October and began to appear again at the end of December. On the whole these distributions corroborate more or less the experience of previous years. When the special hauls taken durmg the Haster and summer vacations in the open sea outside are compared with those taken across the bay at the corresponding seasons, it is found that in all groups the numbers per haul are usually higher out at sea. The Copepods were in force outside rather earlier than in the bay., the maximum for the adult Copepoda being in August at sea and in September inside the bay. In - other groups there is no great difference in time. Finally, it may be remarked in connection with the point discussed in our report last year as to the degree of correspon- dence in time between the hatching of larval fish such as plaice and the appearance in the sea of phytoplankton in abundance, that 1920 may have been a year when microscopic food for the first hatched young fish was scanty in amount. The fish- hatching at Port Erin was unusually early (February) and the Diatoms at least were not present in great abundance until later than usual. It must be remembered, however, that in addition to Biddulphia and Coscinodiscus, which reach their maxima in March, various larval forms of Invertebrata such as Polychaets and Mollusca are present in considerable abun- dance in the early spring months and may serve in part, along with the phytoplankton, as food for the young fishes. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 161 VARIATION IN SUCCESSIVE VERTICAL PLANKTON HAULS AT PORT ERIN.* By W. A. Herpman, C.B.E., F.R.S. (Emeritus-Professor of Natural History in the University of Liverpool.) The degree of uniformity in the distribution of the plank- ton through the water of a sea-area which is under what seem uniform physical conditions is still a vexed question. We are still uncertain as to the degree of validity of our samples, and as to how far they represent more than some proportion of the contents of the actual water which was sampled. The Sargasso Sea, surrounded by the North Atlantic Gulf Stream circulation, and of relatively high temperature through- out, is probably the largest area of apparently uniform conditions that is known, and the results of the German Plankton Expedition of 1889 show that the twenty-four plank- ton catches obtained in that area were all small in quantity compared with those from further North and further South in the Atlantic. Schiitt, who reports upon these results, shows that the average volume of the twenty-four catches was 3°3 ¢.c., but the individual catches ranged from 1-5 c.c. to 6-5 c.c. and the greatest divergence from the average was there- fore + 3-2 c.c., the divergence in the other direction being —18c.c. After somewhat arbitrarily deducting 20 per cent. of this divergence as due to errors of the experiment, he estimates the mean variation of the plankton in the area investigated at about 16 per cent. above or below the average of the hauls. Even this reduced figure does not, however, indicate a very high degree of uniformity of distribution such *] wish to acknowledge, with thanks, the help I have received in this investigation from Mr. Andrew Scott, A.L.S., and Miss H. M. Lewis, B.A.— from Mr. Scott in the examination and estimation of the catches, and from Miss Lewis in making the calculations. I alone am responsible for the work at sea 162 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. as might have been expected in the most “ halistatic ” known area of the ocean. These hauls were taken miles apart at considerable intervals of time; the question next arises whether simultaneous or almost simultaneous hauls taken through closely adjacent bodies of water would show a greater degree of uniformity. Hensen made a series of experiments, also discussed by Schiitt, in which he hauled the same net twice in rapid succession in as nearly as possible the same body of water, on forty occasions, and eight times in succession once, and found that the average error was about 13 per cent. © In all such work at sea it is obvious that much depends upon the weather, the conditions under which the ship is working and the care taken in the experiment. With the view of getting further evidence from a new series of data, taken with all possible care under favourable conditions, I carried out a number of similar experiments at Port Erin during several months in spring, summer and autumn of 1920. They con- sisted of a series of four to six “ successive ” (that is, as nearly as possible simultaneous) vertical hauls taken with the Nansen net of No.20 silk. On each of the seven occasions (four in April and one each in May, August and September) a day was selected when the weather was favourable and a time when it was known that the tide would not prevent the motor-boat “ Redwing ” from maintaining her position on the marks during the twenty to thirty minutes that the experiment occupied. Two localities were used, the one just at the mouth of Port Erin Bay with a depth of 8 fathoms, and the other a good deal further out with a depth of 20 fathoms. The boat was kept approximately stationary in the water, the hauls taken as plumb as possible, and the rate of hauling up was fairly constant at two minutes to 20 fathoms. The catches were emptied from the brass bucket of the net direct into bottles of 5 per cent. formaline, in which they remained until examined SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 163 microscopically in the laboratory—so no loss of material was possible through straining or transferring from one vessel to another. The first four series (six in each) were taken in April during the time of the ordinary mixed early spring plankton _ before the phytoplankton maximum ; the next series, in May (four hauls), was just at the time of the Rhizosolenia maximum and shows a typical phytoplankton ; the August series (four hauls) shows a scanty summer zooplankton; and the last series, in September (four hauls), shows again an abundant phytoplankton of autumn Diatoms and Dinoflagellates. Two out of the thirty-six bottles were unfortunately broken in transit from the Isle of Man, so that the total number examined and now reported on is thirty-four, as follows :— Fathoms. Hauls. Average. April 3 & 6 0-20 c.c., mixed plankton. es 6 20 5 0-56 ¢.c.,. 55 Bs 43 8 20 6 C252 Cie 3 ¥ dl 8 5 0-48c.c;, 55 - May 25 ... 20 4 16-125 c.c., phytoplankton. PUT yaks 20 4 0-50 ¢.c., zooplankton. Pepi. 6%” "2. 20 + 6-10 c.c., phytoplankton, etc. The nature of the plankton in each series was more or less what was to be expected in the locality at that time of year, and the volumes of the catches were also fairly characteristic of the season. The apparent uniformity in the successive catches of each series was obvious at the time of collecting. It seemed to the eye to be the same catch that was emptied from the Nansen-bucket into the bottle of formaline time after time throughout a series. And this apparent uniformity of volume is in most cases confirmed by the careful measurement made afterwards in the laboratory—for example, the six successive hauls from 8 fathoms on April 3rd all measure 0-2 c.c., four out of five of those from 20 fathoms on April 6th are 0-6 c.c., and all four on August 7th from 20 fathoms measure 0-5 cc. The remaining four series show some variation, but 164 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY the percentage deviation from the average of each series 1s in no case great. The volumes of these series are as follows :— Average. April 8— 0-6, 0:6,/0-5, 0-5, 0:4, 0-5. .... 0-52°¢e. » 13— 0-4, 0-6, 0-5, 0-4, 05... a, (0-48) Gre: May 25—19-5, 15-0, 15-5, 14-5 ... 16-125 c.e. Sept. 16—- 6:2, 7-5, 4:5, 6:2 6°10 c.c. If, however, we examine the detailed results of the micro- scopic investigation of the catches, we find that even in the same series similar volumes of catches may be made up rather differently, and may in some cases show surprising differences in the numbers of a species in successive hauls, such as 10 and 100, 40 and 800, 4,000 and 18,000. The same organisms are present for the most part in each haul of a series, and the chief groups of organisms are present in much the same propor- tion. For example, in a series where the Copepoda average about 100, the Dimoflagellates average about 300 and the Diatoms about 8,000. On another occasion we find Copepoda about 1,000, Dinoflagellates about 4,000 and Diatoms about 100,000. These are in mixed catches; in a phytoplankton (May 25th) the Copepoda may be in hundreds, the Dinoflagel- lates in tens of thousands and the Diatoms in the millions. But notwithstanding this appearance of similarity between the hauls of a series, there is a considerable percentage deviation in the case of some hauls from the average of their series—not infrequently about plus or minus 50 per cent., in several cases about 70 and in one case plus 129. The following table gives the percentage deviations in the case of the volumes, and of the estimated numbers of the four chief groups of organisms present, viz., Diatoms, Dinoflagellates, Copepoda and the Nauplii of Copepoda. In all there are about 50 species of organisms that occur with fair regularity throughout the series: 24 species of Diatoms, 4 of Dinoflagellates, 8 of Copepoda and about 14 other organisms or groups of organisms which are not of so much Date and Depth. April 3— 8 fathoms April 6— 20 fathoms April 8-—- 20 fathoms April 13— 8 fathoms May 25— 20 fathoms August 7— 20 f.thoms Septem ber16— 20 fathoms SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. No. of hauls. Greatest Vol. | per cent. in c.c. |deviation average.| from average. 0-2 0 ( —14 0-58 + 3 —23 0-52 Gas —l17 0-48 +25 —10 16-125 +21 0-5 0 —26 6-1 +23 165 Dia- | Dinofla-| Cope- | Cope- toms | gellates | poda pod ditto. ditto. ditto, | Nauplii. ditto. Soil) Tage, elite) o| Tetap ie +24 #21 | ap pate tres ape pea | +4] +56 +49 +41 See ey ee +17 +15 +22 +22 ze fa EGR) le Lope nS Lea SET) +44 +33 +129 Es a ee eae eee +15 +23 +60 +56 te —70 97 —13 —21 | +59 +17 +32 +10 eee ee al ee +30 +36 +53 +37 importance and may be omitted. Of the 24 species of Diatoms as a general rule if a species occurs in one of the hauls of a series it occurs in all, and in many cases in much the same proportions in all; that is, there may be two or three or even more times as many individual cells in one haul as in another, but all will be in the tens, or in the hundreds, or the thousands, or millions. The followmg are a few examples :— April 3— Biddulphia mobiliensis, 1,800, 1,800, 3,800, 4,000, 4,400, 5,400 ; Coscinodiscus radiatus, 1,600, 2,600, 2,600, 2,800, 2,800, 2,200 ; Lauderia borealis, 10, 20, 50, 40, 40, 20; Streptotheca thamensis, 40, 30, 30, 40, 40, 60; April 8— Asterionella bleakeleyi, 12,000, 20,000, 16,000, 36,000, 28,000, 40,000 ; Lauderia borealis, 200, 200, 240, 200, 120, 200 ; Rhizosolenia setigera, 40, 40, 80, 80, 40, 40; 166 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. May 25— Guinardia flaccida, 60,000, 62,000, 63,000, 54,000 ; Rhizosolenia semispina, 1,620,000, 1 120, 000, at 600 ,000, 1,460,000 ; Strevtotheca thamensis, 300, 100, 400, 200. Many other similar examples might be given. On the other hand in the case of other species or on other occasions there was more variation, and such cases as 60 and 800 in adjacent hauls can be found. It is much the same with the four common species of Dinoflagellates recorded. There again we find cases of con- siderable constancy in the hauls of a series, such as :— May 25—Peridinium divergens, 46,000, 62,000, 50,000, 44,000 : and other cases of more variation—even in the same series, such as :— May 25—Ceratium furca, 6,000, 2,000, 8,000, 1,000. Are we entitled from this to conclude that the Peridinium is very evenly distributed through the water and the Ceratium much less so? I doubt it. The Copepoda, occurring in much smaller numbers, seem also to indicate in many cases a fairly even distribution. Sometimes they occur only in units, and yet each haul of the series shows a few :— April 3—Oithona similis, 8, 4, 3, 3, 5, 11; 3— Pseudocalanus elongalus, 10, 85, "130, 110, 79, 80; 13—T'emora longicornis, 10, 5, 10, 10, 10; 13—Oithona similis, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20), 99 99 Other cases again seem to indicate considerable variation in adjacent hauls. Which of these contradictory impressions received from an inspection of the results of the hauls is true to Nature? If the Oithonas on April 13th had been quite irregularly scattered through the water, is it likely that we could catch exactly 20 in each of five successive hauls? On the other hand, if they were evenly distributed, how can we account for one haul (April 6th) catching 40 and the next 140, or for the series on May 25th—20, 80, 460, 290 in the four successive hauls @ SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 167 Some of the other common organisms outside the above main groups show equally contradictory evidence. The pelagic worm, Sagitta bipunctata, is present in nearly every haul in numbers varying from one to twenty-seven, but in some series one or two specimens are present in every haul, while in another case successive hauls in one series varied from one to eleven. Other similar examples might be given from some of the larval forms present. The impression one receives from an inspection of the lists and numbers as they stand is that if on each occasion one haul only in place of four or six had been taken and one had used the results of that haul to estimate the abundance of any one organism or group of organisms in that sea-area one might have arrived at conclusions about 50 per cent. (or m some cases a great deal more) wrong in either direction. | Is such a vague result of any value as a basis for calculations as to the population of the sea? And is it possible that such irregular numbers are compatible with the hypothesis of an even distribution of the plankton throughout a sea-area of constant character? The answer to such questions depends to some extent upon the possible range of error under the conditions of the experiment, and upon the possibility of allow- ing for that experimental error, and of reducing it by more refined methods of collecting. It may be justifiable to claim, as the result of a good deal of work at sea, that the conditions of these experimental hauls at Port Erin were as free from lability to error as any similar vertical hauls from a boat in the open sea are likely to be. The occasions were chosen so that the weather and state of the tide might be favourable, and every care was taken to have the conditions of the successive hauls in each series as much alike as possible. I feel confident that the possibility of error in the collecting was reduced to a minimum. There is also the possibility of error in the micro- scopic examination and estimation of the contents of the 168 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. catch. This only applies in the case of the more minute organisms which were present in great abundance, such as the Diatoms and Dinoflagellates, where samples of the catch have to be taken for counting, and estimations made. In the case of the Copepoda and Sagitta and other larger organisms this source of possible error is excluded, as these forms were picked out directly from the entire preserved catch with the eye or a hand lens and were all counted. Sampling and estimation were not applied to the macroplankton, and yet the irreeularity is as great there as in the case of the estimated microplankton. The experimental error to be expected in the case of the chief groups of organisms, and also in the case of a typical common species of each, has been calculated with the followmg results. The total number of Diatoms on April 3rd varied im the six hauls from 3,880 to 10,020, the mean or average being 8,055. Two of the hauls are below the average and four above. The smallest haul is as much as 52 per cent. below the average and the largest haul is 24 per cent. above. The question is— do these variations in the catch come within the limits of the probable error of the experiment ? If we assume that the estimation of the number of Diatoms © im each haul is correct, then the possible errors are those inseparable from all such collecting at sea—slight movements of the boat, unknown currents in the water, irregularities m the verticality of the line, etc. In this case of the Diatoms on April 3rd the “ probable error” is found to be = 1,458, and the “range” is the mean + the probable error, that is from 6,600 to 9,500.* Comparing this range with the estimated * Obtained as follows :—We may assume that the small unavoidable causes of error are not correlated, and that no single one has much greater effect than any other; also that they tend to make the individual catches more than the mean as often and as much as they tend to make them less SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 169 results of the hauls, we find that three of the series are within the range and three are outside it, and two of the latter (3,880 and 10,020) are very considerably beyond the limits of the probable error of the experiment. The Diatoms for the other hauls give much the same result when treated in the same manner—that is, roughly 50 per cent., or rather more, of the observed variation in the catches is not covered by the calculated range of error of the experiment. In the followmg tables the three principal groups of the plankton, Diatoms, Dinoflagellates and Copepoda, and also three prominent organisms—one from each of these groups—are shown for all seven series of hauls treated as in the case of the Diatoms of April 3rd discussed above, and giving in each case the figures necessary to make a comparison between the range of variation in the catches and the calculated range of error :— than the mean. Then the first process is to find the ‘‘ standard deviation.” Take, for example, the six successive hauls on April 3rd :-— | No. of organisms. — Frequency. Deviation from A2 Mean. 3,880 1 —4,175 17,430,580 6,670 ] —1,385 1,918,225 8,770 | 1 + 715 511,225 9,220 1 +1,165 1,357,224 9,770 | 1 +0715 2,941,224 10,020 | 1 +1,965 3,861,225 48,330 | 6 0 28,019,703 Mean = 8,055 : > Az © me Find a/ 6 = 2,161 = standard deviation. Next find 0-6745 x standard deviation = probable error = 1,458. The range of error = mean + probable error = 8,055 + 1,458 = 6,600 to 9,500 (approximately). The convention is to regard this as the catch, that is the variations between 6,600 and 9,500 are not of any significance—any number between these limits is equally permissible, that amount of variation being possibly due to the unavoidable errors of the experiment, L TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 170 "“VaomrTdor) #OQO tate Vv od ‘Ioddo JO OHUBI OY} Aq PaToAd you oI (PE FO JNO ZZ) SUORTIVA PoArosqo oyy F[VY Wey} oxouN [Bop poos v sv “sULOJRIT OY FO oso oY} UI UVYY UOYeITEA UTEDURT JoyVoLo B UGAD SMOYS SIU J, — ‘SNOLVIG 40 HIdV], ‘T Pp Jo MG 9EZ‘OL 94 $98°9 989°T 96+ 04 €3— oge‘s 009‘TT 94 009°9 v neereeeeeeegT “gdeg P JO yno € PIE 04 099°C GgE LI+ 04 L@— 600° 00g°E 09 OLTS v ae bee ice OLY: f JO NO G 06218 °F O19°E9 6E8'L E+ 04 GE— OSF'EL 00Z‘06 04 009°LS v Se ey seer AO Gg Jo NO G G8 04 GOS GLI PP+ 07 GO— 089 086 °F OFZ “i ea ee aie § JO 400 Pp 06'S 04 009° PEG GI+ 04 0G— ELS OSE 0F OS'S 9 Se ee oe gjomoPpr | GOG‘E 04 §80°% IPL gg+ 09 E¢— FE8‘G OOF F OF OZET g eS Ome 8 9 FO qn0 ¢ 8GE 9} 996 1g PET 09 Bb— LOE O8€ 97 O8T OFS Fee see Tdy "10110 JO — JO + esura puotog O19 “MOT}ELAOP SUOTYVIIVA “IO119 JO OOURY atqeqorg "qUOOD IOg "UOT "MOTYVLIVA JO Couey] “s[Ne PT 04eq jO Joquinyy ; ‘SHLVITHDVIAZONIC] 40 ATAVY, ‘TI ‘TUSUILIOAX8 OY} JO IOIIO JO ooUeL poye[No]|Vo 944 Aq LOF pojUN00¥ 9q JOUUBS SUOTFVIIVA POATOSqo oY} FO “FUloo rod 0G UBY} o10W JOYAVI JVYA SMOYS YOIUM p JO no Z G6S‘618 0F G80°69 cec‘ett | ogt+ or 9e— | OFs‘90L 08‘0G6 09 O&S‘OSF i= “ee “OT ‘dag p FO Ino @ 1Z0°T 09 LIG GIG 69+ °F 0L— | 69L OZS'T 9F O&Z Vien St ee el ee ony z jo qo z | O06 E06'T OF OSFHSET | OPL'GST | ST+ OF 1Z— | POL'FFL'T | O8T'S00'S 7 00T'ELE'T t< Se “eg ART Gg Jo qnOo F O9F'EZ 9F 0O0'ST 1&a°¢ ae OM ig | (hers Oke GO0*EE 04 O6'TT ¢ | ae els ss 9 JO JO € SE8‘OL OF OL8'8E 6L6°¢ LI-- 04 #Z— | 68°79 OSL'SL 04 OZE*6F Oe Se Ee i ee g JO 0G OFZ‘66 0 OFF'6S G06 FL Ih+ 09 19—" | OPE "PL 0Z6‘FOT 99 068°9E Go aaa ig ieee 9 Jo nO g 009°6 04 009°9 Sor'T Pot OF 3E— | SG0'8 0ZO‘OT OF 088"E ee Sa eo see pudyz *LO119 JO = 10: = | esue1 puosog IO119 ‘UOIYVIAOp | SUOTPVIIVA "10119 JO Osu a[quqoig "qU9d Log UvOTL "HOLELIVA JO OUI ‘syneyy eu @ | jo 1oquinyy 171 SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. $ JO no Z F Jo yn Z F JO no | g Jo mno g g Jo qno ¢g g Jo no Z g Jo yno g "10119 JO asur1 puotoaq SUOT}VLICA JO Joquinyy G91 91 L6 OG 01 0Z EES OF I6L O9T*F 94 000‘S OSL FE 04 GOF‘OZ OL9'FE 09 OST‘ZE 869°S 99 89L‘Z ‘10119 JO oDueyy && Lal ILI 6LS 2989 OSST1 9G — 10 + O11 9(QAeqoig ‘quoo Jed YG UeY} SSo] IOYy}eI OSvo sTyy UI—(T 9[qRI,) q[OYA B SB SULOPVICT OY} AQ UMOYS SI Jey} LOMIO Jo ooueI oYY puL suOTyeTIVA Jo osURI OY Tooaqeq uoysodoid oures oy} Yon smoys jfaszt Aq Uaxey WOT] Jo soloeds o[SuIs STILT, $G+ 04 9F— TL oOvr TL = IZI+ 09 gp— Sc+ 09 9g— 9L+ 03 TF— Ly+ 03 OL— GI 09 FE— “UOTFVLAOP "quod Jog ‘SNDIPDL SnasSYpOUi0sO)—SWSINVOUD) IVOIMA], AHA], IO SaTAV], p JO yno Zz 7 joynoz ({[@) # Jo yno F g fo Jno F 9 joynog g Jo yno ¢ 9g jo yn0 ¢ "I0119 JO asuri puokoq SUOI}VLIVA jo Joquinyy GGEg‘s 09 E0S‘T GLO‘T 94 €0E‘T LOZ‘S 04 G66 C6PF 94 GLE SE0'T 99 06L C6Z‘T 93 0&8 GEL 09 FIT “10119 JO osuvy 9GP 98L- 9€9 19 &cl GEG 6 — io + IOI aqeqorg EG-- 0) 9¢— TE OF €T— 09+ 09 ZL— es+ 09 26 — Gor OF 0OF— GP+ 09 OG— ‘UO1L}VIAOp "quod 19g 13+ 99 F1— Of} PpIs}NO LV YO}VO O49 JO SUOTPRIIVA O44 JO (PE JO JNO [Z) ‘Gued Jod HG IOAO ULES oIOET O&T 00% 4 OL 7 see SOT adag cE 09 04 OL - sat ye STs cieray) ‘ony ZOE 008 04 00Z P ceeregeern@g: Kei 08e'e 009'F 04 008% G Giecugh (stack LOG‘LG 000°8F 04 000‘9T 9 oe oe OOP EF 000°F9 94 000‘E1 “i CoN age ae SEV 008°G ©4 009‘T 9 pee eeaen er ey, “UOT ‘MOIYVLIVA JO osULYT ‘sine ET 04°, “Al ‘IOILO JO 9oUvI 626'T EP6'S 09 PEST ee ad Uae 68P'T £96‘T 09 00€'T pe ae a ay, 189T Z19'S 07 O9F 7 PET SN) iy OEP ORG 07 OFS G Sear tes 27 66 G16 OLL‘T 09 Ogg 9 no de bel od 690'T OIS‘T 04 O€¢ g Ace, sake Sl 671 94 9OT 9 ie 2 Ae dy, "UeOT MOTPeIIVA JO onUvY ‘s[Ne TT ‘ore SV GOAM ION EO AL Velictor Tifa meta sens A www UR ey TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 172 “IOLLG FO osuUeL oUF OpIsgno o1B SUOTPCITCA ey} Jo (PE FO yno QZ) vonrodoxd osrvy @ oste podedog yueurutord sty} fo esvo ay} UT 7 Jo mo g 7 Jo moZ 7 jo 4no ¢ g Jo quo ¢ g yo ynog g JO no ¢ g 10 yno € "LO1I9 JO esuer puokog SUOTPLIIVA jo Jaquiny 918 04 8PG LOY 04 L8G 888 °F C6E OSF 94 0GE P6L 94 009 GL6 03 Gc9 OTT °F g8 ‘10119 JO osueyy VEL 9[qQeqoid Lb-+ 09 o— 69+ 07 98— 9G+ OF LL— Th 94 ¥o— eo 09 0F— Gh 0} 8h— €E+ 09 61—- “MOTYBIAOp ‘quod Jog 689 LLE OF9 8 L69 008 86 "UBOT ‘snpbuoja snunjpoopnasg—SWSINVOUQ IVOIdAT, AGUA], 40 SHTAVY, “TA ‘LOLIO JO OSUBI OY} OpPISynO oq 09 (PE FO yNO [Z) SUOIZVITeA PeArosqo oy} Fo uosodoid Srey B smoys Fosyt Aq uoye, o7e[[osepourq peordA, g[surs sTyy Ulvee o1OTT p Jo yno € py JO yO € P JO INO G g JO yn0 € 9g jo no € GIO WMO FT g JO #no € "10.119 JO enue puotog SUOTPOLIVA fo 1oquinyy SLE‘T 94 ZZ8 069‘T 9 OSE‘T L8G‘TS 03 SIL FI CEP 04 GHZ PLL‘ 03 9821 OFF‘T 99 096 €&S 0} 181 "10410 JO OSU =e | 79+ 09 LZ— LI+ 94. 33— pt 04 PE— gegt+ 09 6g— P+ 09 8Z— get 07 g8— IOIIO ojqeqorg "WOTJRIAOP "quo0 oq GE+ 0} €Z— LOG OOL‘T 06E°1 OST‘ST OVE 0eS‘T 006‘T "UvOTN 000‘T 04 OS pe Uy ge vebeaptos es OL “qdag 009 04 OFS P eer eeeercees i ‘ony 000‘ 04 OSI 57 eee eeereses GS ACT OFS 04 06 G ee eeseecenes el 66 098 04 OCP 9 eee eerceccsce 8 66 O9L‘T 04 Wi G ee eereeeeses 9 66 O&1 04 6L 9 etc eee weeee a judy “UOTJVLIVA JO OdUL YT ‘s[ne yy 318 008‘T 03 008 eee 9 ‘ydag OSL‘T 04 OST‘T - eer eeeereeee M ‘ony 00°96 04 000°CI Te... ites og Ae 02S 04 OFT G eeeeeseseeee el e6 002°S 04 OOL‘T 9 eee eerereeees 8 6“ 009‘T 04 008 G eee eeeeesoes 9 ce 0O8Z 0} O9L 9 eee eeeeeeeee fs pudy “UOTJCIIVA JO osuvy “ST ne eos @ fl ‘s0di.4) WINYOIAI—SWSINVOUGO IVOIdAT, AHA, 10 SATAVT, “A SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 1768 To the question what light does a series of four to six successive hauls throw upon the validity of a single haul, say the first of that series, the answer seems to be that as regards mere size (volume) and general nature (such as phytoplankton, zooplankton or mixed) of the catch the series confirms the representative nature of the single haul in a general way and within limits. For example, in two out of the seven series all the catches (six and four respectively) were alike in volume, _ the additional hauls taken exactly confirming the evidence of the first. In the remaining five series there was some diver- gence from the average amounting in the most extreme case to + 23 and — 26 per cent.; so that as far as this experiment ’ shows if a single haul had been taken, in place of a series, it might have given a result about 25 per cent. different in either direction (either above or below the average of the series). Then again, in regard to the nature of the plankton, without going into the exact statistics of the species or even of the groups of species, it is evident to the eye at the time of collecting, and this is confirmed by the microscopical examination, that any one haul is very fairly representative of its series. If one shows a phytoplankton catch, the others do also. But if one next proceeds to deal quantitatively with the groups of species that make up the catches, it is found that the individual hauls in a series may differ widely. The preceding tables show that both in the main groups of the plankton and in those species which have been taken out as examples fully 50 per cent. of the variations from the mean of the series extend beyond the range of error, and are therefore not due to possible imperfections in the experiment. Thus more than half the differences between the hauls of a series remains unaccounted for, and may naturally be interpreted as evidence of an unequal distribution of the plankton in closely adjacent areas of water, or in the same area in successive periods of time. Whether our present methods of collecting and of estimat- ing are sufficiently accurate to enable us to determine the 174 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. amount of this inequality in the distribution, so as to be able to put probable upper and lower limits to the number of each organism per unit volume of water may be doubtful. But even if the data are not yet sufficiently numerous and reliable, we must still work on in the hope that improvements in method and accumulation of evidence may in time enable us to make some approximation to an estimate of the population of various sea-areas. I would go further and say that even if we had no hope of attaining to greater accuracy, our present planktonic results are of some value. Although estimates which may be 25 or even 50 per cent. wrong in either direction may not justify us in calculating exactly the number of organisms and of potential food present per area or volume of water, they do give us a useful approxi- mation. Even if 100 per cent. out, doubling or halving the estimated number is a relatively small variation compared with the much larger increases and reductions amounting to, it may be, ten thousand times in the case of Diatoms, ten to fifty times in Dinoflagellates and five to twenty times in Copepoda, which we find between adjacent months, and even greater differences if we take groups of months, in a survey of the seasonal variations of the plankton in European seas. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 175 ON MEASUREMENTS OF SOLES MADE IN 1920. By JAmMEs JoHNSTONE, D.Sc. In June of 1920 a system of observations on board smacks and steam-trawlers, working in the Irish Sea, was put in operation by the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. Two “fish measurers,’’ Commander A. E. Ruxton and Mr. W. C. Smith, were stationed at the ports of Fleetwood and Whitehaven, and, later on, a postgraduate student of the Zoology Depart- ment at Liverpool University, Mr. G. F. Sleggs, B.Sc., was engaged on similar work. The object of the observations was to obtain data with regard to the sizes and general distribution of the plaice caught by the first-class trawling vessels on the offshore grounds of the Irish Sea. The measurers usually worked on smacks sailing out from Fleetwood and Liverpool, and, though their specific work was to observe the catches of plaice made, they also measured all the soles caught. The results are very interesting and are also quite novel, for there were, previously, no measurements of the soles trawled on these offshore grounds. Since these fish were the principal objects of the fishing of the smacks the region where they occur was pretty well worked and nearly 6,000 soles were measured. Unfortunately it was impossible to arrange for the work to be commenced earlier than the last day in May, so the spawning period of the fish was not fully covered. The grounds trawled over are shown on the sketch chart (Fig. 5). The irregularly-marked regions represent, rather roughly, the parts of the sea worked on the various voyages of the smacks with which the measurers went. The Roman numeral gives the month and the suffix gives the number of hours during which trawling went on. The principal sole-fishing ground is well shown : it extends N.W. from Morecambe Bay Light Vessel up towards Maughold Head and then over towards the coast of Cumberland. Further South-west there was also a good deal of trawling, and some __ catches made in Carnarvon Bay are recorded. June was the best month on the whole, and then the two smacks, with i ' fo a ah ae rk a “3 C ) A2 Find a/ —@ = 2,161 = standard deviation. Next find 0-6745 x standard deviation = probable error = 1,458. The range of error = mean + probable error = 8,055 + 1,458 = 6,600 to 9,500 (approximately). The convention is to regard this as the catch, that is the variations between 6,600 and 9,500 are not of any significance—any number between these limits is equally permissible, that amount of variation being possibly due to the unavoidable errors of the experiment, L TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. 170 a “LOL ~ WS 22 ee STF 70 esuer oyy Aq poroaoo you axe (FE Jo no ZC) SUOIIVTIVA poaresqo oy} yey wey aLOUl [BoP poos v se*suIOPVIC[ OY} FO osvo of} UI ULI} UOLVITVA UL 9oUvI Io}veId © UBAS SMOYS SIU, te P JO NOG 9EZO1 93 F989 989‘T 9E+ 0% ES— 0g‘ 009‘TT 99 0099 T Sean SeeeOTE ado. Pf jo yno € $og‘s 07 0G9°S GSE fae OU Z00°E 00SS 04 OLIS v pea See ony p fo NOG 06218 °9 O19°E9 6€8°L SG 04 Co— OSFSL 00Z‘06 99 009‘L¢ 1 SRE RG eer AT, G Jo NOG GG8 OF GOG GLI Prt 07 Gg— 089 086 093 OFS G See eee 9 JO yno & 0S6‘S 94 008°C PGS GI+ 09 06— ESL‘ OZI‘E 03 O81‘S OMe epee Se G fo Jno PF G9c‘g 09 €80°S Tvl 9g¢+ 03 ¢g¢— POSS OOF F 07 OZE'T G oe eee eee 9 fo yn0 G 8GE 04 OGG 1g LGar, Ol 6h LOE O8€ 93 O8I 9 Gone’ alone) (0h "10119 JO —- 10 + esuer puotoq IO110 "MOTYVLAOp SUOTJVLIIVA "IO11d JO VSULY aTqeqoig quod Iog “UROTAL "MOIYVIIVA JO osueYy “s[neyy a7eqT jo JoquINyy ‘SULVITHOVIAONIC] 40 AIAVY, TL ‘QUOUIIEAXe OY} JO IOIIe FO ooUvL poye[No]vo oT} Aq 105 peqyUNoove oq {O0UUBO SUOTPCLICA PoALosqo oy4 tO “QUV0 god OG uey4y oLOUL LIU Fes qyeyy SMOYS Yor a é | | p jo Og C6S°6I8 09 G80°6E GGSé11 OgS+ 04 9E— Org 90L OSS*0Z6 04 O&Z‘OSP v | BN. care On ‘qdag Pp JO JNO G 1Z0‘T 04 LIS C&G 6G+ 04 OL— 69L OZS‘T 03 O&% v es ieee oe ee OLN Pp fo 0G 006‘E06‘T 99 OZF FSET | OFL'GST GI+ OF 1Z— | POLFELT | O81°800°S 4 00S*SLE‘1 v ee ae “-eg Avy G fo {0 F O9FES 04 000ET 1&3°¢ SL+ 04 1h— [EZ‘0G GOO'ES 09 OG6'IT g Paes: Cie = Q fo No |g ZE8‘OL 0F OL8‘8E 6L6°S fia OMe EE8 ‘79 OZL°GL 99 068 °6P 9 poh’ PERE Gg fo 0G OFZ‘66 01 OFP'6S - G06 FI lia ON ig OPE FL 0Z6‘FOL 93 06E°9E ¢ NG. Sieh, Qe Q JO 4nO € 00¢°6 07 009°9 Sor‘ Pec Ol Goa ego's 0Z0‘OT 93 088° 9 [cr ieee las ¢ [udy "10110 TO — 10 + | esuer puotog IOI19 ‘UOL}eIAOp | SUOTYLIVA ‘10119 JO 9oueyYy a[quqorg ‘quod 1og “UBdTN "UOIYVIIVA JO OOULYT ‘s[ne yy eu G | jo Jaquinyy *SNOLVIG HO ATAV I, of ‘yuoo rod YG UBY} Sse] IoYyVI osvo sty} UI—(T 2[qGBJ,) QJOYA vB sv sUIOyRICT 949 Aq WAOYS SI VY} IOIIO JO douVI OY} PUR SUOTYVIIVA Jo doUvI OY4 weaaqeq uoyrodoid sures oy} YONUT sMoYs jjasyt AQ Uoyvy wWoZeI([ Jo soroods o[SUIS SI J, —_ ~ _ | F JO yno Z €9T 9} L6 | && | PE 03 9F— O&T 00Z 94 OL P “qneererss"OT deg Jo FROG OF 3 0 | FI LL OF TL— GE 09 94 OL Vee ea on se Mie yJOynoT | €E¢ 9} 161 | ILT IZI+ 0} Gh— G9E 008 94 00Z US. ee ge ee ae qe Avil ayo yao S| O91F 97 000'E 6L¢ 8o+ 03 9E— 08e‘é 009°F 04 008% Gi cen blir ay il 3) ee 9jomog | OTHE OF LOF'0Z Z989 | GL+ OF 1F— | LOZ LE 000°8F 93 000°9T 9 ee ae ie ¢gjoynog | OL9'FE OF OT*SE O&s' II L¥+ 07 OL— VOF'SF 000°F9 93 000°E1 Fa | i ee es g g Jo yno ¢ 869°Z 99 891% | 9G GI+ 04 F§— SPs 008° 94 009°T 9 sri et LC Db | | | —__—_}|——. S “IO11a JO — 10+ = osuevi1 puotag IOL19 ‘UOTJVIAOP a SUOT}ELIVA “10119 JO osu aqeqorg "quod 19g “UeoTL "MOIYRIIVA JO osUeYT ‘sine FT ‘ayeq. Oo jo soquinyy = = : * SNIMUpDL SNOS~POUNISOD-—SNSINVOUD IVOIdAT, HAH], dO SHTAVT, “AT = fa ‘IOIIa JO 9SUBL a 9G} 9pisyno o1B YO VO VY4 FO SUOTPCLIVA JY} JO (7g FO 40 IZ) *qU99 rod OG IdAO ulese O10 HL & u l < me P JO yn g Coes 07 COST 9GP G+ 04 9€— 626'T €F6°S 94 FEST v reo OT des at F JO NOG GLO‘T 0F €0E'T 981 Lea esi 68F'1 £961 °F O0E'T v Se eS hae 85) ({[@) F JO no F LOGS 94 S66 9€9 09+ 04 GL— 1g9'T Z19°S 9F O9F v Rahman Sae\ g jo jno 7 C6P 04 GLE 19 €E+ 09 Go— 9EP O89 OF Oe g i gasenate ae 9 Jo yno € GE0°T 94 06L &el Got 0} OF— G16 OLT‘T °F 0G¢ 9 epee ce g Jo yno ¢ C6Z‘T 9} 0€8 EEG P+ 03 OG— 690°T OTST 99 O&¢ 5 Rpg ee atts 9 JO ynO € GEL 09 FIT 6 13+ 09 FI— Sol 671 0F 9OL 9 Scenes eee “10119 jo —sTOl= asuer puotaq IOI19 “WOLyeIAOp SUOTJVLIVA ‘10119 Jo osuvy aqeqorg quad Jog ‘Ueoy ‘HOIYVIIVA JO soueY ‘syne 21eq, jo Joquinyy | ype SO cat ae riety et bp cir ne res ers Fh scares Ieee eds eS 2 EE, *vdodad0‘) d0 AISVY, ‘II tt eel ee Geena a ee —————— Se eS ‘IOIIO JO 9SUBI OYY Optsyno ore SUOTYeITeA 172 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. ayx Jo (pE Jo yno QZ) uomsodoard oSreq v oste podedop quourmioid sty} JO osvo ayy UT y Jo no g 7 Jo mo Z p jo no reg g Jo no ¢ 9g JO yn0 g Jo mno € g 10 no g "10110 JO osuvs puokog SUOTIVIIVA jO coquinyy uomsodord odrey ev smoys Jos Aq uoxey oyeT[odepourg [eordA, g[SuIs sTyZ Ulvse OLOPT yp Jo no ¢ p jo yo g p JO no Z g jo yno ¢ g Jo no g G Jo yno F g JO yno g “10.110 JO exuer puokog SUOTPCLIBA Jo coq WEN Ny 918 94 8hG LOV 04 L8S 888 4 GbE OGP 94 OGE P6L °F 009 GL6 OF GC9 OLL °F G8 ‘IOLIO JO OBUBYT S[qeqord BLE‘L 04 ZZ8 069°L 99 O98‘ L8G‘TS 0F SIL FI CEP 04 OFZ Lb 09 OS— 69+ 94 96— 99+ 04 LL— TP+ 04 F— G3 OF OF— QF 04 Bh— se °F 61— ‘UOLYeLAOp "JUOD 10g, ssngpbuoja snunppoopnasg—SWSINVOUQ IVOIdAYT, ATAHY, JO SATAVY, “TA ‘IOIIO JO OBULA OY} OPIsznO oq 0} (PE FO ¥NO 1Z) SUOIYVIIBA PoAdosqo ot} Fo PLL'L 9} 986'T OFF'T 94 096 63 97 [81 “10110 JO OOULYT BLE 69T LEV's G6 PVG [ve 9G — JO + | ILOILO 9|qeqoid P9+ 04 LE— LI-F 03 G6— P+ 04 HE— €G+ 07 6G— PP+ 09 86— €e-- 04 §e— GE+ 04 €o— "UMOLYVIAOP "quod Jog Z89 000°T °F O18 F sreerersaT sadag LLE 009 4 OFZ ee ene “L “any 09 000‘T © 0ST a aa Go Av P8E OFG 04 062 G eee eee eeeeee €1 66 L69 098 O74 OGY 9 eee eee eeeeee 8 6é 008 O9L‘T 04 OSPF G Ce 9 6eé 86 O&T 07 6L Dr VEE “erg [dy UBOT UOTYLIIVA JO ODULY aS) Lacy 8 | eluey @ | OOLT 008‘T 4 008 (alee 91 “adog 06a O8L‘T 09 O8T'T ie «., eee L “ony OST‘SI 000°9% 09 000°CI ae eee PE Gg Av OFE 0G 07 OFT Ea pea ea 08ST 0036'S 04 OOLT Oaat Cibc? keg gp 00Z‘T 009‘T 074 008 G eee eee eee oes 9 “ce LOG 08% 4 O9L Con SS ar: § [dy “UBOT “UOTPELIVA JO OSULYT ‘s[neyT | ‘aye ‘sodiuy UINYDIAI—SWSINVOUGO 'IVOIdAT, AAUNY, AO SATAVT, “A SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 173 To the question what light does a series of four to six successive hauls throw upon the validity of a single haul, say the first of that series, the answer seems to be that as regards mere size (volume) and general nature (such as phytoplankton, zooplankton or mixed) of the catch the series confirms the representative nature of the single haul in a general way and within limits. For example, in two out of the seven series all the catches (six and four respectively) were alike in volume, the additional hauls taken exactly confirming the evidence of the first. In the remaining five series there was some diver- gence from the average amounting in the most extreme case to + 23 and — 26 per cent.; so that as far as this experiment shows if a single haul had been taken, in place of a series, it might have given a result about 25 per cent. different in either direction (either above or helow the average of the series). Then again, in regard to the nature of the plankton, without going into the exact statistics of the species or even of the groups of species, it is evident to the eye at the time of collecting, and this is confirmed by the microscopical examination, that any one haul is very fairly representative of its series. If one shows a phytoplankton catch, the others do also. But if one next proceeds to deal quantitatively with the groups of species that make up the catches, it is found that the individual hauls in a series may differ widely. The preceding tables show that both in the main groups of the plankton and in those species which have been taken out as examples fully 50 per cent. of the variations from the mean of the series extend beyond the range of error, and are therefore not due to possible imperfections in the experiment. Thus more than half the differences between the hauls of a series remains unaccounted for, and may naturally be interpreted as evidence of an unequal distribution of the plankton in closely adjacent areas of water, or in the same area in successive periods of time. Whether our present methods of collecting and of estimat- ing are sufficiently accurate to enable us to determine the 174 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. amount of this inequality in the distribution, so as to be able to put probable upper and lower limits to the number of each organism per unit volume of water may be doubtful. But even if the data are not yet sufficiently numerous and reliable, we must still work on in the hope that improvements in method and accumulation of evidence may in time enable us to make some approximation to an estimate of the population of various Sea-areas. . I would go further and say that even if we had no hope of attaining to greater accuracy, our present planktonic results are of some value. Although estimates which may be 25 or even 50 per cent. wrong in either direction may not justify us in calculating - exactly the number of organisms and of potential food present per area or volume of water, they do give us a useful approxi- mation. Even if 100 per cent. out, doubling or halving the estimated number is a relatively small variation compared with the much larger increases and reductions amounting to, it may be, ten thousand times in the case of Diatoms, ten to fifty times in Dinoflagellates and five to twenty times in Copepoda, which we find between adjacent months, and even greater differences if we take groups of months, in a survey of the seasonal variations of the plankton i European seas. | SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 175 ON MEASUREMENTS OF SOLES MADE IN 1920. By James Jounstone, D.Sc. In June of 1920 a system of observations on board smacks and steam-trawlers, working in the Irish Sea, was put in operation by the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries. Two “fish measurers,’ Commander A. KE. Ruxton and Mr. W. C. Smith, were stationed at the ports of Fleetwood and Whitehaven, and, later on, a postgraduate student of the Zoology Depart- ment at Liverpool University, Mr. G. F. Sleggs, B.Sc., was engaged on similar work. The object of the observations was to obtain data with regard to the sizes and general distribution of the plaice caught by the first-class trawling vessels on the offshore grounds of the Irish Sea. The measurers usually worked on smacks sailing out from Fleetwood and Liverpool, and, though their specific work was to observe the catches of plaice made, they also measured all the soles caught. The results are very interesting and are also quite novel, for there were, previously, no measurements of the soles trawled on these offshore grounds. Since these fish were the principal objects of the fishing of the smacks the region where they occur was pretty well worked and nearly 6,000 soles were measured. Unfortunately it was impossible to arrange for the work to be commenced earlier than the last day m May, so the spawning period of the fish was not fully covered. The grounds trawled over are shown on the sketch chart (Fig. 5). The irregularly-marked regions represent, rather roughly, the parts of the sea worked on the various voyages of the smacks with which the measurers went. The Roman numeral gives the month and the suffix gives the number of hours during which trawling went on. The principal sole-fishmg ground is well shown : it extends N.W. from Morecambe Bay Light Vessel up towards Maughold 176 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. Head and then over towards the coast of Cumberland. Further South-west there was also a good deal of trawling, and some catches made in Carnarvon Bay are recorded. June was the best month on the whole, and then the two smacks, with No ON a _ \ , 7 r STG Fig. 5. Grounds from which the measurements of Soles were made. which the measurers went, caught about 14 soles per hour’s trawling. In July the number was 9, and it was 7 in August and 6 in September. ' SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 177 The sizes are shown in the table below. There is little change, with relation to the months, for the “ shortest-half- ranges,” that is, the most prevalent sizes of soles caught are :— June, July, August, September. So far, then, as one can judge there is not much indication of a rapid period of growth, as in the case of plaice caught in the same regions, during the summer and early autumn. Measurements of Soles caught in the Irish Sea, 1920. Mean June July. August. September. length SUES EEE Sane i eae Walligy| VIE s| VIERS,, [VIE s| EX | ER ia EX ay | ER ga] TX igg | TX re (19-5 ae ee * wae aon 1 af 4 : vad dee aes 20-5 1 1 ee bee sia 1 2 1 be 3 ae 2 21-5 7 5 es Te Wb. ot oes) i ae ape cect ea ee 22-5 11 1 aie ete 1 2 2 2 : 3 “ 6 3:5 | 23 | 20 1 2 5 2 2 ill kee Pee. s 24-5 46 37 2 Sais 12 2 wig 3 sss 11 gen) |e 25:5 83 42 13 a 28 7 1 13 1 16 10 4] 26.5 92 57 27 1 59 . 22 3 11 1 26 5 49 B75 | 94 | 68 | 42 1 82 21 tele 3 | 26 8 | 64 me5 | 13. | 85 | 47 1 81 37 7 DBL > |. 38 6) 36 29-5 102 62 47 3 108 db 8 18 ie 28 8 83 ~ 30-5 85 91 Ue =o 114 46 9 13 2 48 4 76 31-5 110 73 58 2 109 46 17 17 1 40 ll 61 32:5 108 67 81 Geis 135 44 18 13 1 29 6 52 33:5 85 72 58 1 97 45 6 16 sia 35 8 45 34-5 58 49 60 1 87 38 5 8 1 14 6 | 29 35:5 55 27 46 1 80 23 11 10 1 17 a, |e B65 | 42 | 25 | 18 1 51 19 4 Se 6 5 | 16 Rei eawh itor 12 | 38 18 5 2 2 8 2 7 38-5 24 10 13 1 20 20 + 1 asi 3 2 4 39.5 18 7 3 ne 13 t ose 1 nee 1 des 3 40-5 | 10 i 9 1 7 5 5 2 wih: oe. 3 41-5 5 4 2 1 5 2 5 peta 1 1 a) 6 Bo: 2 2 3 3 a ee a5 Lg eee 43-5 4 cis fess 1 2 1 wo Lice: Hae 44-5 2 a BAe fe Joe ee ae ee | a ae — 45:5 2 5 i: 1 s Pee A 46-5 1 eee eee os eee 47-5 1 1 34) ’ | vi 48-5 eee eee eee | Totals ...| 1,211| 821 | 619 | 28 | 1,137 | 454 | 121 | 168 | 16 | 361 | 84 | 671 Catch re | | | perhour| 14 | 13 9 3 10 8 7 5 1 | 11 | 2 fae 178 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. ON BLACK LITTORAL SANDS IN LANCASHIRE. By James Jounstone, D.Sc. On most places in the littoral zone on the coast of Lanca- shire the sand below the surface is more or less black. On the Formby shore, for instance, on the landward side of the channel between the shore and Taylor’s Bank there is (or used to be) a cockle-bed, but below the upper two or three inches of clean, yellow sand the substratum is very black. At Piel (in Barrow) there is a dense bed of lugworms on the west side of the railway embankment, and here also the sand beneath the surface is black to grey in colour, the superficial layer being yellow. Close to the embankment there are little gutters contaming a few inches of water, and on the sides of these the upper, yellow layer of sand is only about an imch in depth, while below that, and as deep down as one can dig with a spade, at all events, the sand is dense black. Further out towards the low-water mark the upper, yellow layer becomes thicker and the sand underneath becomes grey in colour, and the greyness becomes rather lighter as one goes out away from the shore. The dense, black sand close inshore smells offensively of decaying seaweed and sulphuretted hydrogen when it is turned over. When I first collected a sample I dried it m a steam oven and was, for the moment, surprised to find that the colour had disappeared long before the sand became dry. Even in the cold it disappears rather quickly, a mass of the black substance becoming light yellow in about an hour. But under- neath the upper layer of a quarter of an inch in thickness the dense, black colouration was persistent. It was evident that one has to do here with a deposit of moist ferrous sulphide which rapidly oxidises. SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 179 Samples of the black sand were put into tall, narrow glass tubes and covered with salt-water, fresh water, 5% forma‘ine and 70 % methylated spirit. In all cases the same thing happened: the upper 5 mm. or so of sand bleached rapidly to the normal, light yellow colour and then the action slackened. Very slowly the discolourised layer thickened, but after some six months it was little over about 5 mm. in thick- ness. Some of the black substance was put into a 12 x 3 cm. tube, the latter beme filled to within an inch of the top. The water in the sand was drained off for about ten minutes and then the upper part of the tube was dried and filled with melted paraffin wax, the latter being coated over the outer edge so as to make an air-tight seal. After eight months the sand remained perfectly black and there was no trace of bleaching. A little white substance, rather like a bacterial growth, formed on the surface, but this was not bleached sand: it has not yet been examined. Another, and similar, tube was filled in the same way, but was sealed with an ordinary, unluted cork. The sand oradually dried, but it did so unequally in such a way that air was able to penetrate along irregularly dried paths. These paths bleached to the usual light yellow colour while the other parts remained black. Gradually, however, the whole became orey or yellow, but on the margins of the “ paths ” an ochreous substance, evidently ferric oxide (Fe,0;), began to appear. After eight months the whole contents of this tube had not completely bleached, or reddened. A little of the blackest sand was placed in a glass tube of 2 cms. bore and about 12 cms. long. Hydrogen was generated from zine and sulphuric acid, washed in strong H,SO,, bubbled through a strong alkaline solution of pyrogallic acid, again passed through strong H,SO,, and finally dried in a calcium chloride U-tube. The tube containing the black sand was gently heated and the O-free, dry gas was passed through it 180 TRANSACTIONS LIVERPOOL BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY. until the sand was quite dry. It was then dark grey in colour. When shaken out on to a sheet of paper it rapidly bleached to the normal colour. It even bleached when kept in a desiccator. When examined under a microscope the sand is seen to contain black granules adhering to, and mixed among, the orains, but the latter are not “coated.”” When it is treated with dilute HCl it bleaches at once and SH, is evolved. The solution, when filtered, gives all the tests for iron. When the sand is ignited strongly it also bleaches, but the iron is not then so easily dissolved out, though it can be, of course. The blackening and subsequent bleachmg are easily imitated. Some very clean, white sand was ignited, cooled, and then put mto an evaporating basin and covered with a 0-5 % solution of ferrous sulphate. A little ammonium chloride and ammonium hydrate were added, and SH, was bubbled through the wet sand. The latter rapidly blackened. It was then quickly washed in boiled-out water and put into a tall olass tube with a little overlymg water. In a few hours the upper layer bleached and the result resembled that obtained from the naturally discoloured sand. Just the same effects — were produced when the mixture of clean sand and dilute solution of ferrous sulphate was treated with ammonium sulphide. The bleaching occurred in much the same way, but the decolourised, upper layer was yellow because of the presence of sulphur. Evidently, then, these littoral, black sands are the result of the formation of ferrous sulphide. Every- where on this coast (and especially m the North Lonsdale region) the sea-water in the interstices of the sand contains soluble iron salts. Everywhere there are organisms (lugworms and cockles, for instances) which form excretal substances, and in any case they die in the sand sometime or other. The putrefactive process gives rise to SH, and some ammonia salts, and then the trace of iron present in the water is precipi- SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY. 181 tated as ferrous sulphide. So one often finds a dead cockle- shell in clean sand with some black sand in the shell cavity. Wet ferrous sulphide very easily oxidises, of course, and there- fore the upper layers of sand are always clean. But the black stuff underneath exists under conditions that are nearly anaerobic and so the oxidation is confined to the upper layer. Near the shore there is a continual access of organic matter, in the form of land drainage, which penetrates into the sand and renders the process of formation of ferrous sulphide a continuous one. Further out, over the littoral zone, there is not so much of the organic matter for it is the more easily distributed by the tide, and so the bleached layer is thicker and the underlying discoloured stratum is not so black. The same process, as was pointed out by J. Y. Buchanan,* occurs on the sea-bottom in deep water and is responsible for the formation of blue and black muds. Such sulphide- containing muds and sands do not (or, at least, need not) be found among sedimentary strata, for oxidation would generally have led to the bleaching. But, in such strata, the presence of much iron in the form of Fe,0O, may usually indicate that the sediments from which they have been formed have been the seats of putrefactive processes. * See ‘Accounts Rendered,’? Cambridge University Press, 1919, pp. 183-158. L2 Le ac int 1G _ p 4 = ae r © i iad i ; : * P : W “a — : fe [ 2 e t S eee ; ~; A) > , * wg = 4 ~ = yy et) ee A Peery! = Abst ii eet ae : = ; f = x k, ‘ = = oy . D ‘ s i ot ou bee bl as eg * ‘ 4 : f og See). wae. ae hn i iit, ae j , me pene LEY. re vs ee 75 bh = q + } . : J £ — : F ‘ cut ay > 3 2 : : - 7 'g : a4 ae = P , r a ‘ } . > = J } . _ =~ ¥ ‘ =, ay os ri ~ * 2) Ae — S i = h = L Vif vi F iz 3 * = = ~ ; i £ 2 Es aap ~~ z it ca . PON J a . 5 her Z athe z 4 eas 7 elt + 5 ne ~ Fi i : u STV je ee 4 ® =! y wz s 2 dig , 5 s -% at: exe = * 3 7 ~ te % Ei => = He ae io ‘ 7 Bo ] a ‘! Lae ihe i ary: mn - ‘ 4 = Ss i * x é = c st oe — ij d ‘ 2 law on a ete io ala 2 5 = j 2 = = = aa >“ 7 — é Pi ‘ = - s oe = an =) i oo : \ ren? = 4 - , z = x * = ae) 3 = g AE as sc ( a i e ~ bw =) = = b> % = 4 ~ 3G = ~~ 4 =~ rN » oe A _ - a « = a sis? . . a - 7 ‘a = = q sy) MSE A 2 - 2 = > E & Sait tae eae 7 i. _ x 7 4 <4 - yi » . in ik F: : mi 7 | | ae - P| << Ey a j ri ~# ce s “a A ‘ 4 = eT al = rs ? P - _ ia yi > < A ‘. — > A * * 7 cP ae nt y - e x > . ;. P Z : " 4 mate Nee Se 7 it , =i ' a eee ae % 7 ae i n! hy a een 183 L.M.B.C. MEMOIRS No: XXIV:> ‘APLYSIA BY NELLIE B. EALKES, B.Sc. LECTURER IN ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, READING. CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction ... he aes ae ee be Eos 2% apn 184 History mG re om ae oe eis aes oes << 2 288 Habitat ste ie ae cai oe os pi ese x.) ae Food ... fas a