- glanning ools for: bio dwversity conservation and de ve Felopmdhe projects SANBI Biodiversity Series 7 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects The first in a series of handbooks dealing with project planning in a people-centred development context compiled by Cape Action for People and the Environment Pretoria 2007 Biodiversity Series MCZ LIBRARY DEC 1 4 2011 SANBI Biodiversity Series HARVARD UNIVERSITY The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on | Sep- tember 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include responsibilities relat- ing to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and flora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services devel- oped by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI is to be the leading institution in biodiversity science in Africa, facili- tating conservation, sustainable use of living resources, and human wellbeing. SANBI’s mission is to promote the sustainable use, conservation, appreciation and en- joyment of the exceptionally rich biodiversity of South Africa, for the benefit of all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, work- shops, symposia and other activities initiated by or executed in partnership with SANBI. Technical editors: Gillian de Jager, Emsie du Plessis Design & layout: Elizma Fouche Cover design based on Fynbos fynmense: Elizma Fouche How to cite this publication CAPE ACTION FOR PEOPLE AND THE ENVIRONMENT 2007. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects. SANBI Biodiversity Series 7. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN 978-1-919976-37-2 © Published by: South African National Biodiversity Institute. Obtainable from: SANBI Bookshop, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa. Tel.: +27 12 843-5000. E-mail: bookshop@sanbi.org. Website: www.sanbi.org. Printed by: United Litho, part of the D&V Premier Print Group. Sone eee, Fae ete fae ay ee Be ey, Ot Mle Jap ie tea aileron os iv escape ubonnene Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) ...............0-0s0ecsceeeece rece cbeuseses iv SEVEGCH 22s odicto avers SEGUE eRe SR ts ie eee ei aa nO se ON NG Wn nT Vv ASUS PO STEITETES: 6 cig ghee ONO Oe SCE kee ee oe nn en er as. ee eee eee vi :TTET TUS -422 22.5 Bese ged Ce oie Snir cies ote mR oP Sm vi Section 1: INTRODUCTION eu NING INGO INTE, ooo ee on hrs. hd OW eae Coe cled ds Pein Oe A ee. | cS SCIDIUNEDN KET La 231 [24 fg) BSR i et aoe ene ne a ee ee ee ee 2 Section 2: OVERVIEW OF THE METHOD oo SUIPISJNSYC@ 1? tn 13714 | Fl) BS ie epee i ee eee ane 7 EE CINS STM CURD ALON Ia aoe gg ng ga OP EP 8 Section 3: THE SEVEN CLASSIC STEPS oo PAYS UTS UNUCZALN 2538 0S SSR A ag a a ec ge ee ge ee ee II BOER ASIN AUT SISter nse ite aes sige eos easiehs ons ee week th eee hd Os Ca eee as akale Sh hw ne 13 fe US CT ES AUNT AIN S SSBS oe 25 er cie 6s Chere tos Wi Sse eae aa ROA er eS SP, Se ee 16 ee RE ESI eINGE (SISieey ysis oie) le at aaa oy wae swab lmao ede OaR es os RE Ae he 17 POS Node RO}ECM ECEMENTS: 42 ..2s.c002c00.c ., Sao eR Ree oO ok ee 21 Se ASSESSMENT LO) BSS) i TLC A ISI a se Aah 27 by DIES SUCTHUNGET LATS INTB) C/A ©] Sie ea ana ra ee eee 29 PeVEMVING Tine PROJEGEELANNING MATRIX, .. 2... cve.en ccs cee cee eens deadenenee meneceeeees 34 Section 4: A LOOK AHEAD fet EO OLENA IOIN aici tents tc id tiauaus sham ahah iabvavace Biata onl Guvestneie ctwaueraltianee 515 35 Section 5: HOW TO GET FROM A GOOD PLAN TO AN APPROVED PROPOSAL PE Sine) SOCOM sete fro) fo eins amen eas ASM: HES OA YE ne PL IE. bk 37 2. TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION IN YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH FUNDERS... ............02..02-00005 38 Sy VPS VROURVAASITIN IES (CTU MET © | zt © IS ERI ee eee ee 39 APPENDIX 1 PR GO herein INSIDERWSIEAN GUAGE ys. sitio psc aicien lta oars encanta aS faye ein, iovayaeh oh oyesyagana, Sp aase Sh 43 APPENDIX 2 NOTES FOR TRAINERS: HELPING PEOPLE TO LEARN HOW TO PLAN A PROJECT USING A ‘LOGICAL SEI EUV ORICA E ROACH Geom nerk Gite hanced duleleisjg se woe skal ale we hocie eines ba ha SRP Oe 45 APPENDIK3 LOGICAL FRAMEWORK EXAMPLES FROM THREE CEPF-FUNDED CAPE PROJECTS: 3.1 Mainstreaming biodiversity on the Cape Flats—building good practice in sustainable management .......... 57 3.2 Partnerships, co-operative management and incentives to secure biodiversity conservation in priority areas in PREVEADE IOMSCGIRERION: 225 os aie cieys as seis snl oS om aie aas Aes ae een mS wb win we wine SOE ots 67 Shee ee wbreatened| Plants PrOoramime <<<. 6-622. 6 08s Sos wee sie it ope ema pees nena vee bee we oe 70 iil ic sounds simple, but without people there would be no conservation. If one wants to achieve conservation goals, then people are the source of innovation and commitment that it takes. In addition, people who benefit from conservation are most likely to be interested in ensuring that biodiversity persists into the future. More significantly, conservation provides real opportunities for people to learn, to grow, to develop and to achieve lasting dignity and fulfilment. South Africa's Cape Action for People and the Environment (C.A.P.E.) Programme recognises this and is com- mitted to finding ways of enabling greater participation and involvement of people. This handbook is one of the tools in the C.A.P.E. Toolbox, which addresses the widely felt need to develop, fund and implement conservation projects, particularly at a local level. It is the first in a series of three hand- books that will focus on the essential skills of project development, monitoring and evaluation, and implemen- tation. The approach of this handbook is people-centred and participatory. It is part of the efforts of the C.A.P.E. partnership to ensure that biodiversity conservation contributes to broader socio-economic development. It should be used by communities, NGOs, conservation agencies and government to develop and build capacity for more effective action. |am pleased to recommend it to all of you who are involved in the challenging but worthwhile task of ensuring that our cities, our region and our country can achieve sustainable development. Dipolelo Elford Chairperson: C.A.P.E. Implementation Committee 5 March 2007 Message from the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects is an excellent tool for all institutions and individuals involved in conservation. Planning can sometimes be overlooked, in the excitement to start a project and get the ball rolling, but the importance of sound planning cannot be overstated. All too often, projects are conducted straight through, only to find that the end result is not all that was expected, or, all activities were undertaken successfully, but in the end they do not result in a conservation gain. Sound project planning on what we intend to do, when we intend to do it, and who should be involved and at which stages, are all-important factors contributing to the success or failure of our efforts. CEPF enthusiastically welcomes this addition to the C.A.P.E. Toolbox—biodiversity conservation is too important to leave to chance. Nina Marshall Grant Director Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund 7 March 2007 The Cape Action for People and the Environment (C.A.P.E.) is a partnership programme that seeks to con- serve and restore the biodiversity of the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) and adjacent marine environment, while delivering significant benefits to the people of the region. To implement C.A.P.E., stakeholders throughout the region have been encouraged to develop project pro- posals to access funds from a number of dedicated and nondedicated funding sources. These include the Table Mountain Fund, Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, the WWF Nedbank Green Trust and other funds. Projects themselves range from research and conservation management projects on the one hand through a variety of stewardship projects to community-based natural resource management and piloting of business and biodiversity partnerships. The complex process of project identification, development, monitoring, report- ing and evaluation has highlighted a number of constraints for project planning experienced by all project proponents.At the 2005 C.A.P.E. Partners Conference, suggestions were made as to how the process could be improved. In response, the C.A.P.E. partnership agreed to develop several tools to support its stakehold- ers to plan and manage projects that would not only help to achieve the programme objectives, but also build lasting capacity. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects is one of a series of three handbooks that will form part of the C.A.P.E. Partners Toolbox and that will guide project developers and other practitioners through the full project cycle. It is based on the excellent guides published by Olive Publications. The C.A.P.E. handbooks are modelled on the Olive series, but are adapted for application in the C.A.P.E. context and in- clude relevant actual case studies that characterise the efforts of C.A.P.E. partners in building capacity that will result in benefits to biodiversity and the communities of the Cape Floristic Region. The C.A.P.E. Co-ordination Unit OO ee. ee This handbook is an adaptation of the Project Planning Handbook written by Davine Thaw & Michael Randel and published by Olive Publications in 1998. lt was commissioned by the Cape Action for People and the Environ- ment (C.A.P.E.) Programme in 2006/7. The production of the handbook depended on the support of Anne Kroon and Bram Langen of Olive Organi- sational Development & Training (OD &T), who, sadly, closed their doors at the end of August 2006.We hope that this adaptation will be a small contribution to the continuation of the highly regarded legacy of OD & T. Special thanks are due to Domitilla Raimondo (SANBI Programme Manager: Custodians of Rare Endangered Wildflowers, CREW), who provided the contextual information and project examples, and to Paula Hathorn and Tanya Goldman (Cape Flats Nature), Ismail Ebrahim (SANBI, CREW) and Louise Stafford (CapeNature) for extensive and thoughtful comments on the draft versions. Thanks also to the team of the C.A.P.E. Co-ordination Unit—Azisa Parker, Monique Damons and Trevor Sandwith—for their support with the process of compiling the handbook and for comments on earlier ver- sions. Case studies based on several C.A.P.E. projects that received their initial funding from the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) include: e The C.A.P.E. Threatened Plants Programme—now known as the Custodians of Rare and Endangered Plants Project. e Cape Flats Nature. e The C.A.P.E. Conservation Stewardship Programme. e Putting Biodiversity Plans to Work. Detailed information about all these projects can be found in Fynbos Fynmense: people making biodiversity work (Ashwell et al. 2006, Biodiversity Series 4. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria), or on the C.A.P.E. website: www.capeaction.org.za Support from SANBI’s Publication Unit is also gratefully acknowledged. The process of developing and publishing the handbook was made possible with financial support from the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund. The C.A.P.E. Programme is hosted by the South African National Biodiversity Institute, and is supported by 24 signatory partners. Mandy Barnett C.A.P.E. Programme Developer Acronyms C.A.P.E. : Cape Action for People and the Environment CFR : Cape Floristic Region LFA : Logical Framework Approach MBO : Management by Objectives ZOPP _ : Ziel Orientierte Projekt Planung (Objectives Oriented Project Planning) vi Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Section 1: INTRODUCTION 1. PROJECT PLANNING IN CONTEXT There are a number of approaches to development planning in use around the world. One approach—the project-based approach— is increasingly being used, particularly in South Africa. Introduced to the South Afri- can development community in the late 1980s and early 1990s, it is known by a number of brand names: e ZOPP (Ziel Orientierte Projekt Planung) or Objec- tives Oriented Project Planning (used by GTZ and DSE). e Logical Framework Approach (LFA) or Logframe (term used by Danida, Norad, SIDA, USAID and others). e Project Cycle Management (used by the Euro- pean Union). All of these draw from the school of Management by Objectives. In this handbook we focus on LFA. Donor agencies argue that the value of these approaches is that they bring increased clarity to the aims and objec- tives of recipient development organisations. This allows for the more effective monitoring of success, and for the assessment of impact. This approach is used by the different South African government departments at national, provincial and local level; and most public-private partnerships are formed to achieve the aims of projects planned in this way. The emerging role and responsibility of local government is to oversee the development and delivery of services to its communities and to do this with citizen participa- tion.A basic understanding of a logical project-planning approach has become an important empowering tool for all. Government officials, members of civil society organisa- tions, NGOs/CBOs and individual members of commu- nities have to increase their understanding of the steps in a project-based approach so they are more able to influence, contribute and monitor planned development interventions in their environments. Development Development happens constantly. People make conscious choices all the time to change things for the better. However, there are often constraints and obstructions to development, for example: e Political constraints—certain interest groups deny other groups access to resources, decisions or opportunities; sometimes they purposefully exploit others. e Cultural constraints—some groups of people, for culturally determined reasons, may oppose development as they see it disrupting the pat- terns that have traditionally allowed for social cohesion. e Geographic constraints—people living far from the centres of power and production are ignored or forgotten; or an economic view holds that such areas are not ‘investment worthy’. e Psychological constraints—people themselves might have experienced violence, trauma, exploi- tation or disregard, and do not have the energy or will to change or challenge the status quo. e Environmental constraints—people will rely on natural resources for their livelihoods, develop- ment will be constrained by the depletion of these resources, by climate change or a natural disaster. e The very availability of the range of natural resources on which all human life relies, is often threatened in areas, because of developments that do not take a long-term view of the impli- cations of short-term, more politically urgent demands for more immediate results. Broadly speaking, there are two ways of intervening in the development process: e Through a longer-term fieldwork approach which consciously supports people in identifying these constraints and working through them at their own pace—a process approach. e Through designing and implementing a project that has a defined lifespan. The project, when completed, should leave behind the resources, capabilities and tangible changes with which peo- ple can willingly continue to work—a project approach. ‘Development is not predictable; it is beyond our hoped-for frame; it is dependent on good timing (not time-frames); it is not eas- ily quantifiable; and it is definitely beyond our direct control.’ From a workshop involving development workers and donors (Harare, | 997) Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects if development is seen in this way, then unless designed and planned 1. with sensitivity, 2. with the stakeholders, and 3. with a keen understanding of the social and political dynamics and environmental sensitivity in an area, the project approach may do damage rather than facilitate constructive change. In working with LFA it is important to take these kinds of considerations into account. Purpose of this handbook To provide a simple and accessible introduction to the e language; ® assumptions; and e steps of the project-planning approach. In preparing this handbook, we drew largely on our expe- rience of LFA. Limitations of this handbook A handbook is not, and cannot be, a substitute for a train- ing programme in the method. Readers are encouraged to participate in such a course if they seek to use the method in practice. Every effort has been made to make project planning jargon as accessible and understandable as possible. However, we recognise that the jargon may be confusing for those who are familiar with different meanings of the same terms.A glossary of jargon can be found in Appen- dix |. This handbook is aimed at any development practitioners seeking to: e Expand their knowledge about this approach. e Compare different approaches. e Improve their flexible use of the method. 2. INTRODUCING THE METHOD What is LFA? LFA is a method of planning, comprising a set of steps and a range of ‘tools’, which aim to clarify perceptions, explore options and make choices about what solutions would effectively address particular problems. This approach to planning draws heavily on Management by Objectives (MBO), an approach to managing people and organisations first popularised in business schools and companies in the United States during the 1950s and 1960s. The Logical Framework Approach was first used for planning development projects in the 1970s. It was ar- gued that development projects were not being planned systematically. Unclear and unrealistic targets were being set for projects, and it was proving difficult to co-ordinate and manage these projects. European development-funding organisations have since adopted the Logical Framework Approach. This ap- proach has been adapted to fit with different countries’ approaches to development financing. LFA provides an integrated approach to managing different agents’ sup- port for development projects in many countries around the world. It also provides an integrated approach for different development projects initiated by South African government departments, civil society organisations and business. What is a development project? A development project can be defined as an intervention which addresses developmental problems e by offering particular forms of support; e fora defined target group; e ina specified geographic location; and e within a set time-frame. The aim of these projects is to bring about an ongoing improvement in the living conditions of people. Assumptions underpinning the project-based approach You will have noted earlier that the project-based approach is only one approach to development. Any approach makes certain assumptions and works on the basis of certain principles. It is usually at this level of assumptions and principles that the most interesting debates occur. So it is useful to ask yourself these questions: Assumptions? Do | believe these Principles? Assumptions? Do | agree with these Principles? Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 3 The box below contains some of the assumptions of the project-based development approach. Assumptions/ofithe)project:hased (development approach A development project is a way of providing external support where it is needed. If people were able to bring about the desired change by themselves, they would not require outside support. How- ever, sometimes they are not able to, and need support from outside their community. One could imagine that there is a gap between where people find themselves and the desired change they seek. It is assumed that the project can assist people to bridge this gap for themselves. The focus of an intervention must be on the sustainable alleviation of poverty. The development project is concerned with improving the living conditions of people. Living conditions are not viewed in a narrow way—they include the ecological, economic, social and cultural context in which people live. The benefits of the intervention should continue even after the project has been completed. An intervention or project must end. The intervention is an attempt to change the factors preventing people from acting by themselves. Once the project has fulfilled these responsibilities, the external agents should withdraw. From the beginning of the intervention, there should be a plan to withdraw so as not to create dependency on the project. The intervention should be well planned and properly managed. The project should not result in people being worse off than they were before the start of the intervention. Careful preparation and managing of the intervention can mean that people’s contributions—of support, of their own resourc- es—are not wasted. A project seeks to meet people’s needs (not the outside agency’s needs). The project must be based on the problems and needs of people, and must support people in solving those problems. There are, however, many instances when this approach is used to impose an externally constructed and externally driven development process. Principlesiofithe)LFAapproach M Rights and responsibilities are clearly defined. E This ensures a clear distinction between the rights and responsibilities of the project staff and those " of the target group. O Change is the aim. D A project is designed to bring about positive change. p Iteration is encouraged. R To iterate is to revisit our earlier thinking on the basis of new ideas and insights. O The technique encourages the planning team to constantly check its earlier conceptions or views. Cc The aim is to improve the plan on the basis of new information and understanding. E : S Flexible control. S The various tools can be selected, adapted and used in flexible ways to fit the context and conditions in which they are being used. Transparency. lf used appropriately, the approach ensures that the development plan is open and public to everyone involved. Participatory. One can use the method to involve all stakeholders in the analysis, design and planning of the project. This can contribute to the sharing of information and the building of consensus about the project. -ro-A-rowv NOTE: this approach can also be used in a nonparticipatory way. It is up to you! Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Thejanproachiinjajpicture LFA is a way of planning and managing change. Its approach to change is here represented in a picture. Process of change Direction of positive change Let’s look at what is represented by each element of this picture: Where a group of people currently find themselves with a range of problems. The ‘line of responsibility’ or boundaries which outside agents will not cross in supporting people to bring about change. These boundaries must be discussed and agreed on during the process of project planning. The support provided by the project to people, to enable them to act in new or different ways. People’s own action then brings about the changes they seek. Problem orientation—a key feature of LFA The project-based approach calls for planners to start with the problems people face in their daily lives. Working with this orientation means that a develop- ment project is planned on the basis of the problems that There are four serious issues here. people face. There are other ways in which projects have been developed or planned: 1. People face many problems, many of which e On the basis of the policy of government or a are linked. development organisation. The challenges for a planning team are as follows: e On the basis of an ideological position. 2 E 2 ae ; e On the basis of a ‘good idea’ of some develop- oe Whe smasidenuticd nese problem ment agency. e Who has prioritised these problems? Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects e Who decides which (or how many) problems will be tackled by the potential project? e Does the planning team have enough information to develop informed optional solutions? e Who is in the planning team? (Is it only outsid- ers?) e If the team is only going to respond to one prob- lem, why is this? 2. Different problems affect different groups of people in different ways. This raises the importance of ‘unpacking’ or disaggregat- ing (i.e. separate into its component parts) the notion of community, and identifying which particular people are facing which problems. The LFA method uses the idea of target groups (see page 12 for a definition) to help clarify this issue. Examples of target groups: e Unemployed school-leavers. e Environmental NGOs. e Researchers. e Commercial farmers. e Primary school teachers. One tool in the LFA approach—the Participant Analysis (see page | |)—assists the planning team to have a better understanding of the social and political relations be- tween different stakeholders and their interest in, or how they are affected by,a problem. 3. Different problems have different and, often, many causes. These causes lie at different levels and are often linked to one another. The Problem Analysis, the first step in this approach, aims to help the planning team identify and unpack the relationships between problems. 4. Different problems are experienced as more urgent and easier to solve in the short term. The immediate need for housing and employment oppor- tunities for a community may be felt far more urgently than the need to conserve the unique biodiverse environ- ment in which potential business or housing develop- ments are planned. Weighing up priorities and mediating the short-term and long-term impacts of development initiatives are political challenges. Because projects have a limited life span, they never have to account for long-term negative impacts on the environment. How important is planning for a successful project? Obviously it is of great importance but, as the saying goes, it is ‘necessary, but not sufficient’. It is not a magic proc- ess. A number of other factors must be considered. Is based on well- formulated plans Has clear Is implemented by a competent and objectives motivated team A successful project ... Is located in an organisation with sufficient capacity and capability Addresses real problems Enjoys support from other stakeholders What is clear so far is that: e The method helps us sort out our thinking before rushing in. e The project-based approach is only one way of tackling development. e As with all approaches, it has limitations and should not be used unthoughtfully. e You have to come to grips with the ‘jargon’ of this method to use it knowledgeably. e The project planning approach, as with other approaches, makes a range of assumptions and is used on the basis of certain principles. These can, of course, be contested. e The method can be used mechanically or creatively; destructively or constructively. Though some limitations lie in the method itself, many lie in the minds and hands of the people using it. Approach LFA creatively and flexibly, not doggedly. Enjoy! a ny pare | : a . : 7 : : it ey a a hAieirmiinyti i= win Abe, nt a a = (“ - a vy 2 Si | TS Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 7 Section 2: OVERVIEW OF THE METHOD 1. SUMMARY OF THE METHOD There are two phases to the planning approach: |. The Analytical Phase. 2. The Design Phase. In the Analytical Phase there are four steps: Outputs of each step |. Participant analysis : An analysis of participants 5. Defining the project elements | A definition of the: Development goal/outcome. Project purpose/immediate objective. Output/deliverables. Activities. : Assumptions or external factors are assessed in terms of : probability and importance. 7. Developing the indicators : Indicators are developed for the development, goal, project : purpose and outputs, as a basis for monitoring and evaluation. The design elements are captured in what is known as a Project Planning Matrix. Project elements i Indicators i Assumptions Development goal/outcome Objectives Project area Notes be able to do because of the project’s sup- port. The Objectives (also known as the Project Environ- The Project area ment) There are three components of the project area: There are two levels of objectives: 5 ‘ |. Deliverables or outputs of the project. |. The Development goal or Outcome de- 5 scribes the longer-term benefits to which the : project will contribute. This is seen as the justifi- cation for the project. The activities undertaken to achieve these outputs. 3. The inputs required to undertake the activities. 2. The Project purpose describes what will All the components of the project area are under the come about or what the target group will direct control of the people who execute the project. S Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects The picture below shows the relationship between all project elements. Read it from the bottom, up: Development goal or Outcome And contribute to the achievement of the Project purpose Objectives re Which enable the Project area Which lead to Cm) } Needed to perform Project elements Assumptions There are external conditions that are not under the control of the project, but are needed for success. They have to be assessed to gauge whether or not they pose a risk to the project. Indicators These describe the basis of measuring how well the objectives and outputs have been achieved. Indicators are a foun- dation for monitoring and evaluation. 2. ACASE STUDY TO WORK WITH When learning a new method or approach, we believe it is useful to work with a case study. We invite you to work with the case study as a first stage in applying the different steps of LFA. This case study runs throughout the publica- tion. Do bring your own experience and ideas in as well! Overview/oi(caselstudy: sandplainFlowerkeserve(iictitiousiarea) At the southern tip of Africa, where the continent meets two oceans, is a small stretch of land and sea that boasts an astonishing variety of life. Plants are so diverse and unusual that the region has been identified as a unique ‘floral king- dom’. The Cape Floral Kingdom or Floristic Region (CFR) is the smallest of the six such natural areas in the world, and is the only one inside the borders of a single country. The convergence of the Atlantic Ocean and Indian Ocean weather systems, as well as a multiplicity of topographic fea- tures such as coastal plains, narrow valleys, high plateaus and steep escarpments, has conspired to create an enormous array of habitats and microclimates within which these many thousands of species have evolved. Other factors lead- ing to a high floristic diversity are a complex rainfall pattern with varied precipitation amounts, varied soil types, the frequency of fires producing in some reseeding species shorter generational times and thus higher speciation rates, the evolution in many species of short distances for seed dispersal, a significantly higher pollinator diversity and, perhaps as important as any of these, a relatively stable climatic history throughout the Pleistocene era which resulted in lower extinction rates and relatively more numerous local speciation events. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 9 80 000 kr? in extent 560 vertebrate species ey, Contains 3% of the world’s plant Be Rig? species (0 05% of the land area) ° “f 6S 9 6000 species of vascular plants 11 000 marine ; ‘ Ni 70% endemic animals, 3 500 : ae | endemic 4 # \ FR . = y 456 species of plants per 1 000 km? Close to 100% endemism in invertebrate fauna 142 reptile species, 27 endemic Map based on Mucina, Rutherford & Powrie (2005, Vegetation map of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland, |:| 000 000 scale sheet maps. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria). Only a very small percentage of this area receives any form of protection.At least | 400 plant species are now en- dangered or close to extinction. It is this combination of species richness and enormous threats that makes the Cape Floral Kingdom one of the most important global ‘hotspots’ of biodiversity. Although 11% of the CFR is formally conserved, not all areas are adequately protected.As the existing reserves do not extend across climatic and habitat gradients, these reserves do not include a wide altitudinal range to buffer the effects of global climate change. Many reserves are cut off from other environmentally rich areas. Plants and animals are not able to migrate, either seasonally or in response to climate change, to other reserves by means of corridors, e.g. river courses. Some of the most threatened areas in the CFR are the lowland areas. Only 3% of lowland areas is conserved in statu- tory reserves, while agriculture and forestry have already transformed 31% of these habitats. It is in these lowland areas where most plants on the Red Data list occur. These areas have a rich diversity of wildflowers, but they are under severe threat. Many of these species are becoming rare and endangered. Huge areas of the CFR are used for agricultural purposes.As the total area of agricultural lands is still expanding, the area available for natural habitats of plants and animals becomes smaller and smaller.Agricultural patches of land divide formerly unified areas. This limits movement of animal and plant species between different areas, in turn damaging the natural interaction and sustainability of plants and animals. The intensity of agriculture is often high; farmers work with large areas of monoculture, and the use of water and chemicals is increasing. The direct threats to biodiversity are the symptoms of a deeper set of problems relating to the perceptions and political will of people. The value of natural ecosystems and the need to conserve them are not recognised fully by all. Private landowners, communities, land-use decision makers and local government officials have little awareness of the severity of the threat that hangs over the CFR. Little information is available about biodiversity; and the uniqueness of the environment is not well realised by the people who live close to it. One of the areas in the CFR that deserves special attention is the Sandplain Flower Reserve.! The Sandplain Flower Reserve (SFR) lies within the CFR and is situated about 50 km east of Cape Town. This is one of the only natural fragments left in a highly urbanised area. The vegetation is Sandplain Fynbos. Only 7% of this critically endangered vegetation type remains. The SFR was originally proclaimed to conserve the extremely rare spotted sand lizard. Although this species has gone extinct here, it still remains one of the most important sites for conservation in the area as there are 220 plant species, 20 of which are threatened with extinction, recorded from this tiny 12 ha reserve. The population density in the areas around SFR is about 200 people per square kilometre and it has been rising over the past 30 years. Littering of the environment is on the rise. More often than before, small and larger fires burn the natural environment.Wildflowers are being picked to be sold. Fewer and fewer flowers are seen every year. Nearby agricultural activities and surrounding human settlements make the occurrence of alien species more and more visible. Native plants have to compete with alien species for nutrients, water and space. 'The Sandplain Flower Reserve is a fictional area, created for the purposes of this case study. 10 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Local communities, landowners and local authorities have little awareness of the status of threatened species. Decision- makers have no updated information about the list of threatened species or maps of vegetation fragments. This makes it difficult for them to prioritise conservation action in the area. Communities do have some local knowledge about the use and distribution of plants, but only a few persons have this knowledge and it is not being passed on to new generations. There is little off-reserve conservation. Conservation agencies and government departments have neither sufficient people nor money to protect endangered species throughout the project area. Furthermore it is hard to say exactly how endangered species are—or if they have become extinct already—as little research is being done into the biodi- versity status in the region. The last in-depth study of the project area was done in 1996. The Sandplain Flower Reserve has no full-time staff. Every half year a new student works part-time at the reserve. In 2005 a volunteer group was established by a local NGO to help with conservation activities in the area. The Sand- plain Flower Reserve Working Group (SFR WG) consists of three individuals from the adjacent Naledi community. The Working Group has been instrumental in conserving the reserve. Its constant presence on the reserve and its continuous submission of comments to the City has helped fight the numerous proposals to develop the site.All the members of the SFR WG are unemployed, and survive on government social grants.As these volunteers are desperate for employment opportunities, livelihood opportunities have to be developed for them in the area. The WG is also in desperate need of more volunteers to join it. A need has also been identified to rehabilitate some adjacent areas, but insufficient labour is available. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Section 3: THE SEVEN C LASSIC STEPS THE SEWEN CLASSIC STEPS | 2 Participant analysis Problem 3 analysis Objectives 4 analysis Alternatives analysis 5 Defining the project elements 6 Assessment of assumptions 7 Developing the indica- tors These are the seven steps followed when using this method. Many adaptations to the steps have been made in many different countries over the years. We encourage you, however, to become reasonably proficient in the method more flexibly. se seven ‘classic’ steps so that you can use the This section will look at each of these steps and, using the case study data and context, will give examples of each. 1. PARTICIPANT AN Why? e To identify the people who have an interest in Step 2: the success or failure of the potential project. e To assess their stake in the project. e To have a better understanding of the social and Step 3: political issues that the project planners must take into account. Step |: List all the possible participants or stakehoiders ALYSIS" in a potential project. Prioritise the six or seven most important stake- holders. Ask the question: “Which interests do we believe are the most important ones to analyse?’ Assess these in terms of their: e Problems. e Interests. e Potential. e Linkages to one another. A table like the one below can be used to assess and compare participants. Interest What do they want from the project? Problems What problems do they face? Participant See page |2 for an example of a completed Participant analysis. Potential What might they bring to the project? Linkages Are there any points of— conflict? co-operation? dependency? * Sometimes called a stakeholder analysis. roject planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 12 Pi What is the difference between: ® a participant; ® a target group; and e a beneficiary? A participant is any individual, group or institution that may be affected, _ negatively or positively, by a particular project interven- tion. For example: e Funders of the project. e Suppliers of equipment to the project. e The target group/s and beneficiaries of the project (see below). The target group is a group of people who are targeted by the project _ team as a vehicle for achieving the project purpose. For example: e Schoolteachers involve learners in environmental restoration projects. e Civil society volunteer groups monitor threat- ened plant species. e Landowners clear alien species. The beneficiaries are the group of people who ultimately benefit from a project intervention. For example: e Learners learn practical skills in restoring biodi- versity. e People’s knowledge base expands. e The people in the catchment area benefit from an improved water table. When developing projects that focus on the conservation of biodiversity, it can be useful to think of the environ- ment or biodiversity as a beneficiary as well. Case)study: sandnlain|FlowerReservelrarticipant Analysis) Participant Governments (local, provincial, national) Conservation organi- sations Problems What problems do they face? Want to promote development, job creation, housing de- velopment, but also want to consider the environment. Lack of information about species and vegetation to make proper decisions. Local (nonenviron- mental) NGOs and CBOs Community struc- tures Community residents (including elders and children) Limited funding and resources to pro- mote mission. Isolation, being planned around. Interest What do they want from the project? Improved (image of) job creation, housing, caring about envi- ronment: more votes in next elections. Potential What might they bring to the project? Money, management capacity, connections, legal setting. Linkages Are there any points of : - conflict? - co-operation? - dependency? Conflicts between different depart- ments (e.g. Dept of Environment and Dept of Housing). Ensuring that endan- gered species are conserved. Increased commu- nity development and wellbeing. Community develop- ment opportunities, the need to influ- ence the road map. High rate of unem- ployment. No transfer of local knowledge. Livelihood opportu- nities. Approach to bet- ter managing the reserve, knowledge of conservation. Have to cultivate strong relationship with researchers, those vandalising reserve, etc. Experience in col- laboration with government and community (e.g. volunteers). Wisdom about com- munity dynamics. Local knowledge; enthusiasm. Links with area schools to promote environmental education opportu- nities. Political linkages. Possible conflict: re- source orientation, people-centredness; co-op: buy in = increased levels of custodianship. Other participants could include schools, researchers, volunteers, local businesses, private landowners, etc. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 13 2. PROBLEM ANALYSIS Why? e To understand the range of problems that face people in a particular context or community. e To understand the relationship between certain problems. e To understand the cause-and-effect relationship between different problems. Tool? The problem tree allows the participants to A problem tree illustrating the visualise both the range of problems and the various problems. It is built up by LiL] interrelationship between them.A problem using cards. tree helps us to understand the problems— L_ [| ee it is not intended to simplify them. How? Step |: Write down about |0 statements on the problem. Each statement should be written on its own card and should describe one problem experienced by people in the particular context or community. Here are some examples: V Helpful wording X Unhelpful wording A very small % of the CFR receives protection. Only 3% of lowland areas are covered in statutory reserves. Insufficient and inadequate e Write one problem per card. reserves in place. e Beas specific as possible. Reserves are cut off from ; other environmentally rich e State the problem as a negative eae condition. A growing population puts Hich ihe b e Do not write ‘No ..’ unless this is igh population growth. further pressure on land use. em Per g absolutely true. Conservation agencies gener- | There is no co-operation e Do not write ‘Lack of ..’ as this ally operate in isolation. among conservation agencies. indicates the absence of a solution, There is a lack of potential anidinot a/preblens. will to restore or conserve biodiversity. There is ignorance about the value of biodiversity. Step 2: As a starting point, select one focal problem for the analysis. Note: This is NOT necessarily the core problem or the most important problem. Instead, this is a statement that people agree provides a starting point for building the tree.Write this statement on a different colour card. Step 3: Organise these cards (on a board, wall or table) into cause-and-effect relationships around the focal problem. Here is an example of cause and effect: Effect Unique plant species are lost eeu Vul ble plant species are threatened oa ulnerable plan a i ieee | Natural veld is increasingly being lost Focal problem selected Seuss iate land use for housi te land use for housin Effect nappropria g 4p Cause Urban populations are growing uncontrollably 14 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects People naturally think in cause-and-effect relationships; that is, if x happens, then y will follow. However, different peo- ple interpret the cause of a problem differently. For example: People fail to take care of the environment People fail to take care of the environment People are short-sighted in their greed for profit People are not aware of the value of the envi- ronment These could both be factors, in which case they can be presented as follows: People fail to take care of the environment People are not aware of the value of the environment People are short-sighted in their greed for profit Or, the group must debate which factor, in a particular situation, is the leading cause and which is a secondary or even an imagined cause. Step 4: Add cards as needed to complete the cause-and-effect logic. Fill in any gaps in the logic. e Remove cards that are repetitive. e Rewrite cards to be more specific and real. e Be sure the statements are substantial. Step 5: Review the problem tree to ensure that the planning team agrees that the cause-effect relationships are valid. A problem tree looks something like this: ses FOCAL PROBLEM =i Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects |. Because different groups interpret relationships differently, there is no ‘perfect’ or ‘correct’ prob- lem tree. Rather see this step as an important way of analysing problems and the relationships among them. It helps us to realise the complexity and interrelatedness of problems. 2. What is important, is for the whole group doing the exercise to develop a common understand- ing of the problems and their interrelationships. 3. A problem tree is as good as the correct, realis- tic information you bring to it. If you have poor information, you will probably have a poor tree! It is important for the people experiencing the problems to participate in this step. 5. The problems on which you choose to focus are influenced by who you are and your frame of reference. Case)study:sandplain FlowerReserve)problemitree) Problem Tree Poor quality of life in communities. Human wellbeing impacted. Breakdown of services, polluted rivers, unsafe natural spaces, etc. Critical biodiversity processes are being negatively impacted, and species and habitats are being lost. Too frequent fires in urban settings because of high population densities. Poor information on the state of biodiversity. Alien species invade natural fragments. There are inadequate staff and resources in the conservation , F on agencies to threatened manage the plants. fragemented lowlands. No data available Lowland fragments with important biodiversity are being degraded and converted to other land uses. Land use decisions made without consideration for impact on biodiversity. Farmers plough (critically) endangered natural areas / overgrazing by stock. Urban spatial development plans and frameworks do not take biodiversity into account. Competition for remaining land in the urban environment is high. Farmers and landowners don’t know about biodiversity on their land. Farmers have incentives to plough up natural areas. 16 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 3. OBJECTIVES ANALYSIS Why? e To identify desired improved conditions. e To show the means-end relationship between these desired improved conditions. e To state the expected result or outcome of producing each of the outputs. Tool? An objectives tree describes the range of poten- An objectives tial improvements relating to people’s lives. It sel-. tree using dom happens that all these objectives can be met cards. by a single project intervention. However, it alerts the planning team to the relationship among dif- ferent objectives Step |: Restate all the problem statements in the problem tree as positive, desirable and realistic conditions. They should be stated as outcomes. This means that they are stated as though they have already occurred. Work from the top of the tree downwards. They should also be measurable and realistic. Here is an example: Problem statement Unrealistic objective X Realistic objective V Very low rainfall Very high rainfall Low rainfall is effectively con- served Alien species are a threat to Alien species are no longer a The threat of alien species is biodiversity threat to biodiversity reduced Unique plant species are lost — | No unique plant species are lost |— | Rate of species loss is reduced Step 2: Reword the focal problem as an outcome and Step 4: Add or delete cards and ensure the means-to- write it on a card of the same colour as all the end logic is valid. From the bottom up, read to other cards. check for means-end logic. Step 3: Review the cards and reword them to make Step 5: Draw connecting lines to show the means-end them realistic. Sometimes this requires rewriting relationship. the problem statement. (This is an example of iteration—the process of revisiting and checking The objectives tree looks very much like the problem ideas. It allows the development of a fuller under- _ tree, but shows positive outcomes. See page |7 for an standing of the problems.) example of a complete objectives tree. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Case)study:sandplain|Flowerjkeservelobjectivesitree Objectives Tree Good quality of life in communities. Human wellbeing impacted positively. Restoration of services, safe rivers, safe natural spaces, nearby sites for education on biodiversity. Lowland fragments with important biodiversity are being restored and conserved. Critical biodiversity pattern and processes restored and conserved. Management plans with Improved appropriate fire and information about grazing regimes state of biodiversity implemented. is available. Alien species cleared from natural fragments regularly. Land-use decisions in pilot sites take biodiversity into account. Farmers become Augmented data stewards of the priority on threatened biodiversity on their Civil society groups monitor and promote conservation of threatened species and sites. Communities trained in fire- fighting and plants collected land. responding to y by community fires on oe Biodiversity conservation is emer sites. viewed as a priority. a eee Land that does Priority (ON: Farmers are that promote Wche | Pein biodiversity is aware of conseryation endanger eA zoned for 5 Economic Communities biodiversity bis pean de: is ae eee Sean opportunities are aware of the of land. implemented. F ae: eto in IDPs and Sete Gayrelyy are linked to value of nearby rs a agreed by land- augmented: staff biodiversity biodiversity. use decision- educated in field Pers conservation, about biodiversity biodiversity; Educational and information bared i : businesses are recreational supplied to created opportunities volunteers. ; expose communities to the natural environment. 4. ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS Why? Each card represents an objective that could be achieved. e To identify alternative ways of impacting on the range of problems identified. One project inter- Step 2: Identify the different ‘means-end ladders’ that vention cannot solve all the problems at once. present themselves in the objectives tree. uistead, Question 2: Is the assumption likely to occur? NO. Do not include this assumption in the PPM. It will not affect the success of your intervention. End here. ALMOST CERTAIN. Do not include this in the PPM. It will not affect the success of the project. End here. QUITE LIKELY. Put this assumption in the PPM. Monitor it and if pos- sible, influence it so that it does occur. End here. NO. This assumption could kill your project (KILLER AS- SUMPTION).Warn the decision-makers. Stop the project. Case)study-JASsSumptions) Project elements Development goal/Outcome By 2020 the biodiversity of the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) is effectively conserved, restored wherever appropriate, and delivering significant benefits to the region. Immediate objective The status of threatened plant species in priority conservation areas of the CFR directly improved through the conservation actions taken by landown- er custodians and community groups. Assumptions Government is committed to biodiversity conserva- tion at high levels and line agencies are required to incorporate biodiversity into planning. International funding is available for the incremental costs of biodiversity conservation. There is private-sector investment in sustainable bio- diversity-based business. Existing conservation organisations remain commit- ted to working on off-reserve programmes with civil society groups. Civil society has the desire and skills to work closely on management plans. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 29 Outputs |. Programme for threatened plants is set up and given the capacity to work with civil society. 2. Civil society in pilot areas knows about threat- ened plants and has been given the capacity to conserve priority sites for the conservation of threatened plant species. Civil society in pilot areas is interested in becoming involved and being mobilised to conserve priority sites. Conservation organisations can develop effective mechanisms for supporting civil society’s involvement in conservation. Landowners change their land-use practices based on knowledge of the threatened species occurring on their . Information on threatened plant species in the land. CFR is updated and in an accessible format for making decisions about land use, Red Listing and volunteer programmes. CPU ensures that the data collected are continually made available to civil society for making decisions about land use. 7. DEVELOPING THE INDICATORS e Indicators help us to determine the progress being made towards meeting project objec- Indicators state how the performance standard to be reached (in order to achieve the objectives and outputs) will be measured. tives and should provide, where possible, e Indicators can be direct or indirect. a clearly defined unit of measurement and target. Here are some examples: Indirect indicator (proxy indicator) Objective Direct indicator Volunteer households have a higher standard of living (e.g. school fees are paid). Numbers of jobs for conserva- | tion volunteers increased. e Increased livelihood opportuni- ° ties for conservation volunteers. How? Step |: It is important first to specify the elements of each objective in some detail in order to identify appropriate indicators for objectives. Here is an example of what these details should include: Target group (for whom?) Groups of previously disadvantaged people. Twelve volunteer groups are involved in the clearing of alien spe- Quantity (how much, how often?) es Groups are able to recognise 90% of the alien species and to clear Sxaliey (nowsn cll?) 70% of alien species. Time (by when?) Between October 2007 and October 2009. ‘ Gordon’s Bay. Location (where?) 30 Objective Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Specified objective Increased percentage of habitat protected. The percentage of valuable lowland areas protected has risen from 3% in 2006 to 10% in 2009. 2: Learners have a better knowledge of biodiver- By the end of 2009, 70% of all Grade 6 learners know what sity. species in their area are at risk, for what reasons, and what they can do about it. When specifying objectives, remember that indicators Step 2: Identifying the appropriate indicators involves should be S.M.A.R.T.: e They should be specific. e They should be measurable. e They should be achievable. e They should be realistic. e They should be time-bound. Objective Increased percentage of habitat pro- tected in formal conservation areas. General public is more involved in biodiversity issues. asking which element/s of each objective you want to measure. Remember that the indica- tors you define must enable the project team to measure the progress of its work. Here are some examples of indicators: Geographic information available | Not needed. at local authorities. More volunteers are willing to Less littering of the veld. work on conservation issues. Conservation agencies receive more donations from the public. It is often helpful to have more than one indicator for each objective. A good indicator is: Independent: No two indicators in a PPM can be the same, i.e. one indicator cannot be used on more than one level. Factual: An indicator should not rely on subjective impressions; it should rather reflect fact. Plausible: The change recorded should be attributable to the project and not to other factors. Based on obtainable If the data are not readily available or costly to collect, then monitoring and evaluation data: can become difficult and expensive. Objectively verifiable: Project partners, outsiders and sceptics should be able to verify that change has genu- inely occurred. Indicators serve as measures and guiding values in the The MOV refer to how and where one can check that early stages of planning.At a later stage, when the project —_an objective has been achieved at the intended perform- is implemented, they can be reviewed, and more useful ance level. In other words, means of verification are data and realistic indicators formulated. However, the initial brainstorming about the type and content of indicators should be done at the planning stage. Research to establish figures, percentages, time- frames, etc. can be done later with specialist expertise. Step 3: Identify how the evidence will be verified and sources. The sources of information about the achievement of ob- jectives should be agreed at the planning stage to ensure that there are ways of verifying success, i.e.: e What information is needed. e In what form the information is needed. checked. These are the means of verification (MOV). e Who should provide the information. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects e How the information will be collected. e How often (frequency) the information should be provided. Here is an example: Objective Increased percentage of habitat pro- tected in formal conservation areas. General public is more involved in biodiversity issues. Geographical information available at local authorities. Six additional volunteers willing to work on conservation issues. Grow income with 5% through dona- tions from the public. No littering of the veld. 31 Means of verification Geographical system at local gov- ernment level. AGM recordings of volunteer groups. Financial statistics of conservation agencies. Comparative field study report. To check the usefulness of an indicator, ask these ques- tions: e Is the information you need available from exist- ing sources? e Are you sure that this information is reliable and up to date? Casejstudy:sA\complete)|project:planning)matrix e Will you have to gather the data yourself be- cause they are not available elsewhere? e If so, do the benefits of having these data justify the costs of collecting them? See examples of indicators and means of verification in the context of a complete PPM on page 14. (The example shown here is based on a CEPF-funded C.A.P.E. project that was implemented by SANBI.The project is now known as the Custodians of Rare and Endangered Wildflowers—CREW.) Project elements Development goal/Outcome: By 2020 the biodiversity of the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) is effectively con- served, restored wherever appropriate and delivering significant benefits to the region. Indicators The priority species and habitats defined as irreplaceable in the C.A.P.E. strategy are maintained. The Protected Area Network expands to include all areas iden- tified in the C.A.P.E. strategy as irreplace- able. The levels of pro- ductivity measured in 2002 in terrestrial (wildflower harvest- ing) and marine eco- systems (total catch) are maintained. The gross revenue generated by the protected area system increases by 10% per annum. Means of verification C.A.P.E. monitoring and evaluation reports. State of CFR biodiver- sity report. Provincial State of Environment reports. Annual reports of conservation agencies. Reports of the C.A.P.E. Co- ordination and Imple- mentation Commit- tees. Assumptions Government is com- mitted to biodiversity conservation at high levels and line agen- cies are required to incorporate biodiver- sity into planning. The National Biodi- versity Strategy and Action Plan supports effective conservation of the CFR. International funding is available for the incremental costs of biodiversity conserva- tion. There is private- sector investment in sustainable biodiversity-based business. Project purpose/ Im- mediate objective: The status of threatened plant species in priority conservation areas of the CFR is directly improved through the conservation actions taken by landown- er custodians and commu- nity groups. Outputs: |. Programme for threat- ened plants is set up and given the capac- ity to work with civil society. Civil society in pilot areas knows about threatened plants and has been given the capacity to conserve priority sites for the conservation of threatened plant spe- cies. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects At least six civil society groups in pilot areas, Continuing to monitor and promote the conservation of threatened plant spe- cies. All of the land-use decision-making in the six pilot areas takes threatened plant distribution and status data into account. At least |2 priority sites for threatened plant species are un- der effective conser- vation management through actions taken by civil society groups. Management guide- lines for threatened plant species are determined in 100% of the pilot areas. Training courses for workshop facilitation, data management and project management undertaken by the end of Year 2. Six civil society groups in priority C.A.PE. areas identified and commit- ted to working with the project by the end of Month 4. Twelve new sites in the CFR have a more se- cure conservation status with management plans incorporating guidelines on conserving threatened plants, as a result of civil society projects in the six pilot areas by the end of Year 3 By the end of Year 3, 75% of private and communal landowners, on whose land threatened plant data were collected, know about the presence and status of these species. Data on threatened plants collected by civil society groups. Data layers on threatened plant distribution are being used (available) by land- use planners in pilot sites. Management plans. Certificates of participa- tion in training courses. Memoranda of Under- standing. Management plans; records of meetings with relevant officials, activities conducted at different sites. Records of field trips conducted by civil society groups. Awareness pam- phlets for farms. Existing conservation organisations remain com- mitted to working on off- reserve programmes with civil society groups. Land-use policy places value on biodiversity and provides positive incen- tives for civil society to be involved in conservation. Civil society has the desire and skills to work closely on management plans. Civil society in pilot areas is interested in becoming involved and being mobi- lised to conserve priority sites. Conservation organisa- tions can develop effective mechanisms for support- ing civil society’s involve- ment in conservation. Landowners change their land-use practices, based on knowledge of threat- ened species occurring on their land. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Information on threat- ened plant species in the CFR updated and in an accessible format for making decisions about land use, red listing and volunteer programmes. Existing information on threatened plants syn- thesised and a spatially explicit database linked to CapeNature set up by the end of Year 2. Civil society volunteers have been given the capac- ity to identify rare and threatened plants and to collect standardised moni- toring data. Six civil society groups involved in data collec- tion in selected pilot areas from Month 5 until end of project. Information gaps filled through specialist input and targeted field-trips by staff and additional volunteers throughout the programme implementa- tion by the end of the project period. We have CFR threatened-plant database CPU data layer Field data forms com- pleted by civil society members. Six-monthly news letters. Field data forms com- pleted by specialists/volun- teers and staff members. 33 ee, eeeeeeeeeeeeoeeeeeeeeEeeeEEeEeEyEyEyE_—EeEeE>E>E~EE~™R_R—EEE———E——>—&K&=———~ey————EEE—EEEEEEEEES SSS CPU ensures that the data collected are continually made available to civil so- ciety for making decisions about land use. e Identified and assessed the external factors or risks that could affect the success of the project. e Explored how to adapt or revise the project to avoid or contain external risks. e Defined the indicators of project achievements. Remember ... e It is important to understand what indicators are and how important they are for project management, BUT it is more useful to define them once you move into project implementation. e Until you are at the ‘coalface’ and working with the dynamics of implementation, it is not easy to draw out realistic indicators. The PPM is now complete but it is important to review it. What follows is a set of questions to help you to do this. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects REVIEWING THE PROJECT-PLANNING MATRIX Some questions for reviewing the project- planning matrix (PPM) Is the PPM complete? Does it contain: e A Development goal or Outcome, which de- scribes impact? e A Project purpose, which describes the effects of the project on the target group? e Outputs, which describe the project perform- ance? e Indicators at all three levels? e Acomprehensive list of activities? e Inputs (staff, materials, equipment, etc.)? Are the planning levels of the PPM logically linked? That is, e if activities ... then outputs; e if outputs ... then Project purpose; e if Project purpose ... then the Development goal/Outcome. Are the planning levels logically linked when considering important assumptions about the project environment? That is, e if outputs and assumptions ... then Project purpose? e if Project purpose and assumptions ... then De- velopment goal/Outcome? Do the Outputs describe the performance of the project and, specifically, the assistance that the project delivers to the target group? Example: Materials developed ... Staff trained ... Credit facilities available ... If you have Does the Project purpose describe the target group action that is required to achieve the Development goal/Outcome? Example: Target group uses relevant skills ... Target group organises ... Target group constructs ... Does the Development goal or Outcome de- scribe the expected development impact? Example: Beneficiaries have higher income ... Environment is protected ... Beneficiaries enjoy better health ... Are the indicators at all levels of the PPM spe- cific enough and do they satisfy the minimum requirements regarding the e Target group (Who?) e Location (Where?) ¢ Quality (How well?) e Quantity (How much?) e Time (By when? How often?) Are there objectives that are not planned? Are all the stated important assumptions likely to occur according to what you current- ly know? Are important assumptions listed that do not actu- ally qualify to be important assumptions, since they describe factors that can be strongly influenced by the project? Are the stated Outputs and Objectives real- istic (can they most probably be achieved?), especially when considering the risks involved (i.e. the probability of important assumptions holding true)? e worked through the questions to help you to review the PPM, and e you are satisfied that the project is realistic and achievable with the resources you have, then it is time to develop a plan of operation. eee Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 35 Section 4: ALOOK AHEAD THE PLAN OF OPERATION What is it? How? An outline of activities, time lines, responsibilities and costs for each output. Step |: Select the first output and enter it on the top line of the table (see case study on page 36). Step 2: Identify all the activities that have to be done to it? Why do it: achieve the output. List them in sequence. The Plan of Operation guides project managers and staff Step 3: Starting from the first activity, list: in their day-to-day operation regarding: ¢ The time by when it will be done. e The steps required to achieve the outputs. e Who will be responsible for seeing that it is done. e Who is responsible for certain steps or activities. e Deadlines for various steps or activities. WHERE TE STL COIS e The costs of different activities. Enter these in the operational planning document. Timetable The scale of the activities and the length of time needed to achieve the output will help you identify what time- scale to use in this column. Week | 2 3 4 5 6 Etc. Month Jan Feb March April May June Etc. In the column, write the period when the activity will be completed. This will guide the project managers and staff as to when the next activity can be expected to begin. Person responsible It is wise to put only one person's name or title in this column.Although it might be a team that conducts the activity, one person is responsible for seeing that the activity is completed. Costing It is useful to think of three different items: e Personnel costs could be the cost of project staff, consultants and other person-related services. Full-time salaried staff, part-time staff and temporary staff can be considered. These can be expressed in person hours or person days, weeks or months. Other personnel costs can be included (e.g. subsistence and travel for a consultant). e Capital costs are the once-off or occasional purchases of capital goods, such as: © Equipment (vehicles, computers, tractors, overhead projector, furniture, printing equipment). © Land or buildings (these can be dealt with as a separate item if there is not a once-off payment for a pur- chase). e Consumables are items that are used only once or are used up quite quickly. Examples are stationery, seeds, building materials, the fares for road and air travel, and the cost of training materials. Output No, 2: Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Case\study: Planjof Operation serve priority sites for the conservation of threatened plant species. Activities Run workshops with stakeholders from the priority areas identified by the C.A.P.E. Low- lands Project to identify all existing civil society groups (e.g. small NGOs and CBOs), and areas where potential groups can be formed. Select six areas where there are appropriate civil society groups or individuals with a poten- tial to form such groups. Visit areas and encourage the identified civil society groups to take part in the programme (wherever feasible, recruit individuals from previously disadvantaged groups). Select a champion for each civil society group with whom the Custodians Programme will liaise throughout the project implementation. Run training workshops to give capacity to groups to collect information about threat- ened species, act as conservation agents in their areas, and to manage selected sites where threatened species occur, actively. Provide groups with continual support and guidance in the implementation of appropriate conservation actions to conserve and man- age the threatened plants populations in their areas. Set up partnerships between civil society groups and the C.A.P.E. Incentives Programme to ensure that civil society groups receive both legal and other support required to secure the conservation status of their sites. Time frame Third Quarter 2006 First Quarter 2007 May 2007 June 2007 Third Quarter 2007 Fourth Quarter 2007 until Nov. 2009 Second Quarter 2007 Completion date: Nov. 2009 Person respon- sible Programme of- ficers Team leader Field workers and programme officers Programme of- ficers. Training co-ordi- nator Programme of- ficers and field workers Team leader Civil society in pilot areas knows about threatened plants and has been given the capacity to con- Costs/Inputs R3 000 per workshop + sal- ary: R550 000 for three years Transport to meetings; hiring meeting venue: R2 000 per work- shop Transport, venue, materials, exter- nal consultant: R50 000 Total costs: R625 000 ———” Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 37 Section 5: HOW TO GET FROM A GOOD PLAN TO AN APPROVED PROPOSAL 1. INTRODUCTION The good news is: you have got to this stage! You have for your programme is a process that often asks for a a well-thought-through plan. Your plan is based on an lot of thinking power from many people in the organisa- informed analysis of participants, problems, objectives and _ tion. The temptation might be to send your plan as it is alternatives. You have developed project elements that to your possible funders to get it financed. ‘It was well make sense, and all assumptions and indicators are care- thought through, we looked at all the options; we truly fully formulated. believe that this should be the way forward.’ It is hard to imagine that anybody else might not agree with you Unfortunately there is also some bad news: you are not immediately. done! Not only because your plan has to be operation- alised and implemented, but also because quite likely you You will probably feel disillusioned when you discover have to convince external (or internal) funders to make that funder organisations will still ask questions, want some financial/human capital available for your plans. more background information or want you to reformu- Support agencies usually require written proposals for late the proposal in their standard format. project support. Number one tip: do not be upset when this happens. This Having completed a plan on paper is often a moment of chapter will help you to take your plan to the stage of an great euphoria, and it should be! Getting to a proper plan —_— approved proposal for funding. Some thoughts about funders ... (adapted from www.sangonet.co.za) It is important to know how to handle different types of funders. It helps if you take into consideration their individ- ual backgrounds and personality styles. Here are a few tips that might help you in that crucial face-to-face encounter that will dictate whether you get to implement your annual plans or shelve them for (yet) another year. Here we have identified four general types of funders. Caution! As with any situation—it is dangerous to generalise! People are unpredictable and we often realise the mistakes in our assumptions long after it is too late to repair the damage. Your interactions with funders will often reflect the chaotic principles that define human existence. Take these tips with a pinch of salt, but always remember that a little bit of extra effort is likely to produce far greater returns for all involved! |. Some funders are quite academic. Be very aware of protocol and the correct forms of address.A loose and unstructured approach will not win you many points. You will score much higher in their estimation if you come across as well informed and rather scholarly, with a deeply held conviction in the work that you are doing. This integrity will be further embellished by a healthy resumé loaded with a number of credible projects and activities linked to organisations (and people) that they admire. Do not, for any reason, try to play one funder off against another! 2. Other funders’ main concern is that they want to know whether you have been spending their money wisely. For this reason, it is a very good idea to make sure that you submit all the necessary reports and M&E indicators on time and according to a predefined schedule. Try to make sure that you seem organised and efficient (even if your last mode of transport has given up the ghost) when they arrive for a visit. It will do you no credit if your working environment is a shambles and it looks as if nothing has happened for the past five months! 3. Some funders like talk in plain business terms. Please note that ‘plain’ rarely means ‘simple’. They may try to assume a soft exterior, but underneath it all, they are pure bottom line. Try not to come across as a typical hippy, a tree-hugger. These funders will feel safe in the presence of people who give the impression that they make swift, logical decisions, unhindered by any weakness or sentiment. 4. A different kind of funder generally wants you to let down your guard and show your humane side. They want to know that you love what you are doing and have a sense of dedication beyond the calling of any other mere mortal. In this chapter we shall discuss some essential points to consider when establishing and building your relationship with funders. Then we offer you some practical tips on the actual process of transforming your plan into a funding proposal. 38 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 2. TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION IN YOUR RELATIONSHIP WITH FUNDERS ... Funder organisations are different from you, but in some ways also the same Like your own organisation, funder organisations have their own: Back funders (be they other NGOs, their government, a national lottery, international funders, the public in their area). Policies. Internal challenges. Institutional limitations. Fashionable jargon. Establish and nurture contact with the funder Identify the particular person who would consider a funding request and make some personal contact before sending the proposal. Try to meet one of the programme/funding officers from the funder organi- sation when they are in the neighbourhood. Show them what you do, because visualising the projects/ programmes and your organisation helps to build the perception of a trustworthy and relevant organisa- tion or programme. Research the policy and practice of the poten- tial funder before putting in a funding proposal Do not ‘spray and pray’. Sending proposals all over the world without starting a relationship or really spending some time to see if there could be a fit, is often not much use. Funders receive many ‘long-shot’ applications. Know how your objectives and goals fit in with the philosophy and mission of your particular funder organisation. Once in a while make a cost-benefit analysis of the relationship On a regular basis, assess what you are getting out of the relationship and where it is taking you. Get a sense of the funder’s requirements, how much you will be able to keep doing the thing you chose to do. If the amount of energy (or frustration) you put into a relationship is too high for what you get in return, then try to shift this imbalance. If efforts to change the relationship are fruitless, then end the relation- ship. The funder needs partner organisations like you You might feel like the underdog in the relationship. Funders have the power to grant you some money or to decide not to. This is of course true, but funder organisations also need you. They have to prove to their back funders that money is being spent effi- ciently and effectively on relevant issues. Funders or even officers in a funder organisation also have to spend their money within a certain time frame (e.g. a calendar year). If they do not, they might receive less to spend the next year. It might be worthwhile to know when funders are struggling to spend their money (e.g. at the end of their financial year). The relationship between organisations is a relationship between people The relationship between your organisation and a funder organisation is based on the relationship between two contact people in these organisations. However, people move on and so relationships have to be re-established, reaffirmed or renegotiated on an irregular basis. Do not be taken aback or feel offended. This is just the way things go and it might imply that you have to spend a bit more time and en- ergy on re-establishing the relationship. If it happens often or with friction, this may call for a conversation at a higher level. Funders are not all the same A bad experience with one funder might dull your ability to establish a relationship with another one. ‘They are neo-colonial, bossy, never listen and have strict formats to follow!’ Sometimes funders want a different kind of relationship with partners, but partners keep responding to them in their usual way. Take opportunities to establish or change relation- ships with funders. Timing of presenting the proposal Contact the funder before and during the proposal- writing process to find out about general trends or new areas of interest. This early communication with the funder may dramatically increase your chances of success. If you have a relationship already, inform your funder once in a while what you are planning to do in the near future. Send the funder a draft of a programme you are planning. You might want to invite them to give their thoughts: they might be will- ing and feel honoured.Asking them for ideas some- where along the process ties them into your project in a way. Their basic understanding of your plan will improve and they might be more inclined to grant you funding. To ensure that your proposal will not be pointlessly submitted, verify that funding is still avail- able. Ensure that the funding disbursement schedule and the application deadline (if they exist) match the time constraints of your project/programme/organi- sation. Many funders fund grants only at certain times of the year. Become familiar with the funding sched- ules of the funders in which you are interested, and co-ordinate your submission with their timetables. Make sure you complete your application in time to meet the funder’s deadlines. Nothing is worse than preparing a submission and missing the deadline by a week. Unless you have the time to prepare prop- erly, do not compete for the grant at all. The time between submitting a proposal and the granting of funding can take from two weeks to six months. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects ———OO OLE CO Do not be too surprised or angry when funders still ask you questions You have thought so well about this plan, this is it! ‘How dare they question our ideas, do they think we are not capable of doing our own work?’ Though these feelings and thoughts are normal, sit back be- fore responding and consider the following: © Their questions could be valuable. They see other project plans, and have an understand- ing of some lessons learned in organisations elsewhere. They see it from a different per- spective; their perspective could be useful and enhance your plan. © In their circles, being critical is seen as a key part of their work. They will have to account to their back funders for the appropriate use of funding. If too many approved projects/ programmes ‘fail’ or do not deliver what they promised to deliver, their funding from back funders might be endangered.As a result, 39 future funding to other partner organisations and the programme officer’s own job might be at risk. °o The culture of feedback differs in different organisations, cultures and countries. Some- times the value ‘be professional in your judge- ment’ tends to move towards being too scep- tical or in other cases, too positive. Often officers in funder organisations are trained to see the flaws and possible problems instead of the innovative character and the possible benefits of a proposed project. @) Responding with irritation seldom helps. You are an expert in your plan and your specific context. Funders are not. Just explain. It might be useful to get a better understanding of the question behind the question. Answering the direct question might not be too helpful. Try to get a real conversation going on the ‘pos- sible question behind the question’. 3. TIPS FOR WRITING YOUR PROPOSAL A ‘typical’ proposal to a funding organisation could contain the following paragraphs: Development objective: explained and justified. Immediate objectives: explained and justified. Outputs: a description of outputs. Activities: a description of main activities. SCTE Coa I ON Ole oe Inputs: a description of inputs from all sources. unrhwn— 6 . The project-planning matrix: as an appendix. oO Working with predefined structures for pro- posals Often funder organisations give partner organisations a structure for their proposal. This might be to help these organisations handle the influx of proposals they receive. It will make it easier for them to com- pare and assess project/programme proposals. The structure may also be provided as a service to the organisation that is asking for funding and may not be An example of a ‘typical’ format for a proposal to a funding organisation Context: a brief summary of the context in which the project is proposed. The project: describes the project idea in brief, with comments. Primary stakeholders: a description of the main stakeholders, including the beneficiaries. Secondary stakeholders: a description of the stakeholders that are not directly involved in project planning. Assumptions: a description of assumptions/external factors. . Sustainability: an overview of how the project will sustain itself. . The implementation plan: refers to the schedule of activities in the matrix. . Organisation and administration: responsibility, who will do what. Monitoring and evaluation: a description of the system you will use. . The budget: (with comments if necessary) as an appendix. compulsory at all. It might be worthwhile to enquire about the format. Some funders will be satisfied as long as the topics that are covered in their format are answered in one way or another. Get a feeling of the other’s style of writing Glance through a funder’s annual report, its docu- mentation, its e-mails. ls the style very formal? Are 40 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects the reports and communications very long? What wording is used? This could give you an indication of the style of writing (and reading) that your funder organisation prefers. However, several styles might exist in an organisation. Do not be afraid to ask your contact persons in the funder organisation for their impressions when reading the proposal. This might give you some lessons for follow-up funding propos- als or for monitoring and evaluation reports. Translate your plan to a proposal that fits the other’s mindset and jargon All organisations use their own favourite wording. This is a reality we have to live with. Some organisa- tions might want to force others to use their word- ing. You do not have to do that. In your plan, use your own wording, but in the process of getting the plan into a proposal, you may have to adjust or ‘translate’ your wording to suit their jargon/vocabulary. What you term an ‘impact’ could be an ‘effect’ for some- body else, an ‘output’ could be an ‘outcome’, etc. These small differences in interpretation can have a huge impact (or effect) on the funder’s ability to un- derstand the proposal and therefore on your chances of getting your funding. A logframe is not a particularly useful format for communicating information to others The logframe/project-planning matrix was designed as a way of creating a well-thought-through and detailed plan for your project. It is not a good way of communicating. The tables often run across several pages, and short of the funder organisation’s print- ing everything out and sticking the whole table together on a wall, it does not give a good overview. The logframe or project-planning matrix holds many details that might be of interest to a funder, but it is helpful to give them the big picture of the plan before sharing the small details of the framework (in an ap- pendix). Put the first column of the framework into words (a one-pager) to show the funder what the project proposal is about. Show the logic. The reader wants to know where the proposal is going. Give an overview, an executive summary It can be quite frustrating to read through 20 pages of an introduction before you find out what someone wants from you.A good proposal needs an execu- tive summary that quickly identifies, for the potential funder, what difference a funding contribution would make and what contribution is requested from the funder. Consider how much of an introduction is re- ally necessary It could be offensive to start a long, detailed intro- duction on the history of South Africa or on the context of HIV/Aids. The funder already has basic information about this. They might view this as chal- lenging their knowledge if you start from scratch and explain basic facts to them. If you really feel that detailed information is needed, put it in an appendix. The funder will probably skim through the appendix, but it might give you the feeling that you provided all the information and might even show that you were really trying to be as thorough as possible (or it might give the funder the feeling that you were wast- ing trees!). Structure, grammar and layout must not be ignored ‘The project is good, that will show. It does not need fancy window dressing’ Unfortunately this is not completely true. Unclear structuring, sloppy gram- mar and ignoring the look/layout of the proposal can cause unnecessary frustration for the reader. Do spend that extra hour making bullet points, check- ing your spelling, checking and double-checking for typographical errors, including page and paragraph numbering and making subheadings to give it a pro- fessional look. Assess your current writing capability and get help if needed Good thinkers and doers are not all good writers. Make an honest assessment of your writing skills. This is not to say that you cannot learn how to become (an even better) writer, but unchecked experimenta- tion here might be a costly lesson.Ask someone else who is not closely involved in the planning formula- tion to read the proposal. If they struggle with some parts, it is likely that a funder elsewhere (with possi- bly a different native tongue, a different context and a different writing style) will get confused (and possibly annoyed) while reading your proposal. It might be worthwhile to give attention to reformulating, clarify- ing and restructuring your proposal with the help of a colleague or someone else. Do not try to impress funders by writing long texts It may sound obvious, but do not make the proposal too long! Try to re-read the proposal and see if you can remove bits and pieces without losing the gist of your plan.A 50-page proposal for the funding a R5 000 project is probably out of proportion. Most programme officers in funder organisations are responsible for the funder’s relationships with dozens of other organisations. They have limited time to spend on reading, analysing and forming an opinion about your proposal. Excessively long proposals might also indicate that your organisation is not clear about its plan.Why can they not explain it briefly? It might also suggest to the funders that you have something to hide. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 4\ Common reasons why proposals are turned down. A checklist: e The problem being faced has not been explained properly. e The problem does not strike the reader as significant. e Client groups (community) have not been involved in the planning. e The proposal is poorly written and hard to understand. e The proposal objectives do not meet the funder’s objectives. e The proposal asks for funding beyond the funder’s financial capability. e The programme has not been co-ordinated with other NGOs. e The funder has not been assured of your organisation’s capabilities. e The objectives of the project are too ambitious in scope. e The writer did not follow the guidelines provided. e There is little evidence of your organisation’s sustainability beyond the life of the grant. e The evaluation procedure is inadequate. Source: www.sangonet.co.Za For further information, look at the 39-page Toolkit Writing a Funding Proposal on www.civicus.org or visit Sangonet’s website: www.sangonet.org.za Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 43 APPENDIX 1 JARGON... THE INSIDER'S LANGUAGE Many theories, approaches and methods typically use meaning. It is not a question of whether they are right very specific terms or words to mean certain things. One — or wrong, or whether one agrees or disagrees with has to become familiar with the jargon to understand their meaning. Rather, the terms have the meaning for them.When you do, you become an ‘insider’. this particular approach but not necessarily for other approaches. There are also many terms that have very specific mean- ings in project-planning approaches. To understand the Some of the most important terms in project planning— approach, one has to embrace these terms and their in particular in the LFA methods—are defined below. Activities: the steps that the project must take to achieve the outputs. Assumptions: external conditions that are not under the control of the project (i.e. external risks), but without which the project will not succeed. Alternatives: the possible project intervention choices available to the planning team. Beneficiaries: the people who will experience improved conditions (benefits) as a consequence of the project targeting their needs. Benefits: the positive conditions of change resulting from a project. Development goal: describes the benefits that will result fom Khetprejcee nae Ae gee pa ae epee Ee Rees eis Oy ae Pai rs ee. im twit Evaluation: measures the impact of the project (an evaluation is poral conducted a an oe ternal agency). Immediate objective: see Project purpose. Indicators: the evidence we need to measure whether or not an objective has Been achieved. none Buon aoe the haar financial and material resources required to implement the project. (eration: = eee Auer fevers and checking our ideas. Nothing is static or complete. a Wee sate cece case damnanene am eee ae Means of Paiheacon ae “pelecation or source of the evidence used as indicators of project achievements. fenoass 0 ~C*~*~<“‘:SC*;*C task peebeerinethe progress of the project. It is an internal management func- tion of the project. epecnes le an d Eseribe one we are trying to achieve. There are four levels of objectives in the ZOPP approach: goal, purpose, outputs and activities. @pecere: Bags atool Pon etalice anlimproved future, linked on a ‘means-end’ basis. OVIs i Fis, 5 biectively penne indicators—see Indicators above. eee PE meee ue cas that ym sacs = Bee, oe Ours: tact laaiaaalaalt d Bscribe the responsibilities of the project, and the services and products it will deliver. Siaajelelaie eeciceieunieesacee pecs Preete ita oy : fool © analyse all the players who have an interest in either solving a problem or ‘keeping the problem going, problemi a 3 EES spot of what, on a daily basis, blocks development. Problem eras ‘de ane : foal © snalvee fneanee of problems facing people, and how the problems are linked. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Project: a set of planned activities designed to achieve specific objectives with given resourc- es within a specific time frame. Project purpose: describes what the target group will be able to do because of the support they . . ; receive from the project. | Results see Outputs. Target group: the people whom the project aims to support, and whose resultant actions will bring about a benefit to themselves and/or to others. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 45 APPENDIK 2 NOTES FOR TRAINERS: HELPING PEOPLE TO LEARN HOW TO PLAN A PROJECT USING A ‘LOGICAL FRAME- WORK APPROACH’ Introduction These brief notes will attempt to give the prospective trainer some tips and guidelines about the following three ques- tions: e How does one conceptualise and design a training programme? e How does one draw up a detailed plan for a training programme? e How does one run and manage a training programme? These three general questions will be answered in a specific way using the LFA to Project Planning as the technical learning objective, increasing knowledge and understanding of the CFR as a contextual objective, and conservation and sustainable local economic development as the broad practice objective of the training programme. 1. Conceptualising and designing a training programme There are many benefits from investing time in conceptu- outcomes, such as lectures, role-playing and alising and designing a training programme before moving experiential exercises. It is also about what tools into the detailed planning stage. will be used to assess this. This step looks at e Investing time gives an opportunity to stop and what is needed. think about what one has to achieve. : ae ; rae e Planning focuses on the ‘micro steps’—the timing e It brings a sharper focus to the objectives of the and duration of each exercise, the instructions EOIN UCP MTL Se for tasks, the content of handouts. This step e It helps to contextualise the purpose and value focuses on how the training will be carried out. of a particular training intervention—why this training and why now? Conceptualising a training programme e It encourages one to look at the bigger picture— how this training fits in with other capacity- development efforts, and to what changes it will contribute in the longer term. ing programme: Some questions to consider when conceptualising a train- e Why is this programme important? What is the The diff lising, designi d empire c no coneepeuallsing, Cesigning an need? What are the problems to be addressed? planning are as follows: e What does the programme hope to achieve? e Conceptualising involves looking at what learners ees What objectives should be met? know and do not know, exploring what they have ssi SUC OA Noe do, angi fommnlaane a e Who is the target group? What is the context of jectives or outcomes. This step focuses on why : Se aia the learners? the training is important. RS se ; —_ : e What criteria will be used to select participants/ e Designing is about identifying which method- P P ologies and approaches will best achieve these learners? What problem or need does this programme aim to address? Members of an Environmental CBO Network in the Cape Floristic Region are experiencing a number of problems: e The voluntary members are losing motivation and focus. 46 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects e There are very few resources to support the running of programmes. e Ideas that are put forward for new projects seem to get stuck. e There is very little capacity to form and maintain partnerships with resource agents. e Projects that are started seem to fail or are not completed. e Poor internal and external communication. What does the training programme aim to achieve? This programme aims to strengthen CBOs in the network to continue to innovate and run vital conservation and res- toration projects. This will be achieved by increasing the capacity of CBOs in the network to design, plan and manage conservation projects more effectively. Who is the target group? The target group of this training will be leaders from CBOs in the CFR Environmental Network. These leaders are responsible for initiating, planning and managing projects implemented by the members of their organisations. What is the context of the learners or trainees? Leaders of CBOs are very busy and often burdened people. They are often heads of single-parent families and are un- employed. They are good at identifying the opportunities or problems that have to be addressed. They have the ability to mobilise people and organise them to get things done. They do not have the technical capacity to develop the writ- ten plans that are needed to secure support for the organisation’s action projects. The effort to keep things going with minimal resources and the lack of capacity is quite disheartening at times. What are the existing resources on which the training programme can draw? |. The Network has several experienced project managers with specialist knowledge of biodiversity and capacity in restoration and conservation. They also have information about donor partners that are committed to an environmental agenda. 2. There is a commitment from experienced project managers to pass on their knowledge. 3. A handbook on project planning has been developed with some notes for trainers, which can be used as resources. What theoretical framework will the programme adopt? The programme will be based on the Logical Framework Approach to project planning. It will demonstrate participa- tory planning methodology and will encourage reflection on the importance of participation as a central factor for sustainable development. The programme will use the Action Learning Cycle as the learning approach. Writing the objectives for the training e Keep the objectives specific and describe what programme will be found once the objective has been e How do you want participants to change through achieved. this training programme? e What skills, Knowledge and attitudes do you want participants to have gained? For example: 5 Eden dala x. By the end of the course, participants will have: To create awareness of and clarify attitudes * An understanding of the importance of participa- on tion in project planning. To develop a deeper understanding of ... e An understanding of the LFA as whole and the seven steps of the LFA to project planning. e State the objectives as outcomes, that is, as if E inearad = they have already been achieved. Stating the ob- e Applied these seven steps in a small group in the jective as an outcome makes it easier for trainers process of drawing up a project plan. to be clear about what kinds of tasks they have e Reflected on group dynamics and given and re- to design to achieve this objective. ceived feedback on participatory behaviour. For example: By the end of the course, participants have developed a Braj | ac-the LEA e Make sure the objectives are relevant, realistic roject plan using the - and time-bound. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 47 For example: e What will the broad curriculum be? What are The above objective would not be relevant to a group some of the issues, concepts and skills that have of experienced project planners who want to increase to be covered? their capacity for managing and monitoring project e What training approach and methods will be implementation. eoplementa used? How much theory will be used? How Nor is the above objective realistic and time bound much practice? unless it states how long the course takes and the 5 eNs e j i j level at which participants enter the programme. How much contact time is needed to achieve the objectives? How should this be phased? Designing a training programme e What existing resources can be drawn on? Where can we go to find case studies, exercises 2 . ae and materials that are relevant to the context? Here are some questions to consider when designing a e What support will be provided to help learn- ers integrate their learning into their life and/or e What are the objectives of the programme? work situations? training programme: An example of a design for a training programme What are the training objectives? By the end of the five-day training programme, Leaders of Environmental CBOs will have: e Reflected on their experience of initiating and running projects and shared the lessons learned. e An increased understanding of a project approach to development and the assumptions and principles of the Logi- cal Framework Approach to project planning. e An understanding of the LFA as a whole and the seven steps of the approach. e Applied the seven steps to a case study of the CFR and drawn up a project plan. e Experienced the challenge of participatory planning, reflected on group dynamics and given and received feedback on participatory behaviour. What training approach will be followed? An adult education approach will be followed in which the Action Learning Cycle will be used extensively. The pro- gramme will attempt to cater for the challenge of the participants’ individual learning styles and challenge them to learn in new ways. What is the broad outline of the programme? What issues and concepts will What methodology will be used? What resources will be re- be covered? quired? Appropriate handouts, participants’ actual experience. A demonstration and presentation of the cycle and application throughout the course. Approaches to development and les- Interactive presentation and some Brief notes in the Project Planning sons learned from experience. reflection on experience. Handbook. Introduction and background to the Notes in Project Planning Handbook. LFA. Conservation and restoration of A generative conversation Notes in Project Planning Handbook biodiversity to ensure sustainable and the reading of the case study. and resource experts. development. Participant/Stakeholder analysis (Step | Brief presentation and application in Notes in Project Planning Handbook One). small groups (six to eight people.) and appropriate equipment. Brief presentation, demonstration, appli-_| Notes in Project Planning Handbook cation in small groups, presentation and | and appropriate equipment. feedback and debriefing of the step. Group dynamics and group norms, Reflection on process exercise, brief Handouts and appropriate equipment. challenges of participation. presentation and norm-setting exercise. Objectives analysis (Step Three). Same as in Step Two. ear rae eg 8 | Action Learning Cycle and favoured learning orientations. Problem analysis (Step Two). 48 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Alternative Analysis (Step Four.) Review of the Contextual and Situ- ational Analysis Phase. Plenary discussion. OHP or display board, notes in Project Planning Handbook. Introduction to Design Phase. Presentation of the ‘Development Project elements: Development objective Immediate objective Outputs Activities (Step Five). Indicators and means of verification (Step Six). Assumptions/External factors. Operational Plan (activities and inputs). Some handouts on participation and facilitative behaviours. Summary and evaluation. Presentation and individual exercise. Evaluation questionnaires. Conversation and a feedback exercise in groups. Participation and the project team, group closure. How long will the training programme be, and how will it be phased? This course will be a five-day training programme. Each day will consist of four one-and-a-half hour sessions. The day will start at 08:30 and close at | 7:30. How will the programme be assessed? Peers and the trainers will assess informally, with the option to submit project documentation individually to trainers for a more formal assessment. 2. Planning to implement a training programme, drawing up the detailed plan The design is about the overall road map, and planning is about the detailed directions on how to get there. In training there are two broad areas that need planning: e The content of the programme, made up of the individual sessions. e The logistics of the programme: these include booking the training venue, transport to the venue, catering and all the other details needed for learners to be comfortable. We will deal only with the detailed content of the plan. The plan looks at each session in the programme and how to get there. It focuses on the steps needed to achieve specific objectives. The plan answers questions about ‘how’ and ‘when’. Planning a training session The detailed planning of a training programme is one of the most creative elements of a whole training proc- ess. During this process, trainers have to draw on their knowledge, emotions and intuition in order to prepare training material and processes that are interesting, absorbing and pitched at the right level for the learners. It is important to ensure that whatever is planned will contribute to the objectives of the programme. The following set of questions is helpful when planning a training session: e What is the purpose of the session? e What are the interests of the participants? What is their current level of capacity? e What will the content of the session be? e What method/s will be used in the session? e What steps will be followed in the session? e How much time is available? e How will the session be debriefed? How will we draw out learning? Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Name of the session Approaches to development and lessons learned from experience. Session objectives At the end of the session participants will: e Have a clearer understanding of development. e Have explored what blocks or constrains devel- opment. e Be aware of two approaches to intervening in the development process. e Have reflected on and shared their experience of initiating and running projects. Time allocated The session will run for one-and-a-half hours. It will take place in the morning on day one of the course. Method/s to be used This session will use a range of methods: plenary conver- sation, presentation, an individual reflection exercise and a group discussion. Steps to follow 1. Development buzz: introduce the theme of the session ‘WHAT IS DEVELOPMENT?’; ask participants to buzz in pairs around this question (five minutes). 2. Development definition stations: invite partici- pants to stand up and move around the room and read the four or five different definitions that have been stuck up on the wall at different stations. e Follow a logical sequence as far as possible. Keep a flow in the programme and find links between different sessions. e In general, have four main sessions of 90 minutes each, split by tea and lunch. e Theory should come before an exercise designed to put the theory into practice. This gives the learners some ‘hooks’ on which to build their understanding. e When working with a complex model or framework, make a conscious decision about how you will present the material. Depending on the learning styles of the participants, you may choose to present the ‘big picture’ first, or to start with its constituent parts and build up the big picture (perhaps building in experiential exercises at each stage). e Decide what notes or handouts to give learners in order to enhance their learning during the ses- sion, and their revision afterwards. e In general, move from individual exercise to pair exercise to small-group exercises and then to plenary. This encourages learners to reflect on their own experience and to build participa- 49 SS aa SS] SS SSS... Ask participants to choose one that makes the most sense to them and to discuss, with the others who have chosen it, why they favour that definition. Allow one speaker from each grouping to say why they think their chosen definition is the most rel- evant (20 minutes). Presentation: what blocks development and two approaches to intervening in the development proc- ess (15 minutes). Individual reflection on experience: Individual participants are asked to think about a project in which they have been involved and to make some notes guided by the following questions: What role did you play? What were the project goals? What were the highlights? What were some low points? What was achieved? (10 minutes). Participants join two others and share their stories (15 minutes). Each triad is given two cards and asked to extract two key insights about what makes a project success- ful (10 minutes). In the plenary, each triad shares their two insights and the cards are stuck up on a flipchart (10 min- utes). Debriefing the session: the trainer asks the partic- ipants: ‘What new insights have you gained, what have you confirmed about your understanding of develop- ment and development processes?’ (10 minutes). tion as learners gradually get to know and feel safe with each other. The use of pairs and small groups also ensures that those participants who do not feel comfortable speaking in plenary remain an active part of the process. e Take a developmental approach. Start with the simple and move to the complex. For example, it is better to start with simple case studies than to throw participants into very complicated role playing. e Never plan for more than 20 minutes of unbro- ken input or lecture. e Allow enough time for the introduction of exer- cises, and for debriefing afterwards. If the exer- cise involves a number of steps, it is advisable to have instructions written on a chart or individual copies made for each participant. e Hold extra material in reserve. This allows you to be flexible in your approach and to adapt and change sessions when necessary. Having more material than you require also allows you to deal with unexpected needs or issues in an unflus- tered manner. e Use active exercises after lunch. It is a good idea to get people moving, particularly if they have had a heavy meal. Find ways to raise the group’s 50 energy level to avoid the common ‘graveyard hour’ phenomenon. e Do not publish a detailed timetable. Remain flex- ible—things have a way of changing! Using learning support material The effectiveness of a training course or learning pro- gramme can be increased by the innovative use of learn- ing support material. e Awell-developed textbook/handbook on the content being taught can guide the structure of a course. e It allows individual learners who learn best by reading, rather than by following verbal instruc- tions, to go ahead or catch up. e lt decreases anxiety in learners when they are given the assurance that the material covered in Name of the session Problem analysis (Step Two of the Analysis Phase of LFA) Session objective At the end of the session participants will: e Know what a problem analysis is and why this is an important step. e Have learned to use a problem analysis tool,‘A Problem Tree’. e Have gained a clearer understanding of the CFR. e Be more aware of the way different people think and understand the cause and effect of different problems. Time allocated This session is planned to run for 90 minutes, but the time it takes will depend on the group’s capacity and dynamics. Methods to be used This session will use a range of methods: brief presentation on problem analysis, instruction and demonstration of the ‘Problem Tree Tool’ in plenary.An application exercise will be completed in small groups followed by group presentation, question-and-answer session and individual reflection. Steps to follow 1. Brief presentation on problem analysis: As an introduction, present points on the problem orientation of the LFA (pages 4-5 of the handbook). Show slides of the relevant pages in the handbook to explain the rationale, the analysis tool and how to develop the problem tree. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects the session can be found on certain pages of the handbook. e Learners can be asked to read a set chapter to prepare for the next day’s topic or to revise and deepen what has already been covered. e An exercise in a handbook can be used ina course, or a set of instructions in the handbook referred to in an application exercise. e A handbook/textbook can be used to consoli- date and sustain what is learned in a training programme. It is important to remember though, that time should be set aside in the course to orientate learners to the resource. This could involve scanning the whole resource together. Another way could be to ask participants to name the areas covered in the course, that they would like to revise or take further. Then the group can be guided through a process of finding the relevant sections and then scanning them. Reveal and explain them step by step and demon- strate with cards on a board, using your own exam- ples or those offered by participants. Developing the problem trees in small groups: Inform participants that they are to be divided into small groups to develop a problem tree based on the CFR case study. (Group allocation has to be done thoughtfully, to try to ensure some balance.) Before the big group divides into the separate workstations for small groups, ask the participants to refer to the relevant pages in their handbooks and get them to read together with you the ‘Notes’ on page I5. Each group works on developing a problem tree us- ing the equipment provided (blue cards, marker pens, pins and a large pin board). Trainers move around the groups, offering assistance if needed. Group presentation: One group is asked for volunteers to present their problem tree to the rest of the big group. Questions for clarification and understanding are asked and answered. Debrief the Problem Analysis Step: In plenary, a discussion is facilitated around the fol- lowing question: What have you learned from this step and why do you think it is important? Individual reflection: Ask the participants to make notes on what they noticed about themselves and others’ different ways of thinking about problems. What new insight have you gained about yourself as a rational thinker? Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects S| 3. Running and managing a training programme What has to be considered and kept in mind at each stage of the actual implementation process? In any life situation there is a beginning, a middle and an end. This simple truth also applies to the training programme. The entry phase Opening up a training programme involves finding ways of enabling participants to enter fully into the process. There are five key areas to which a trainer has to give attention during the entry phase: e Enabling participants to feel familiar with and comfortable in the training room. e Introducing participants to one another and building the learning group. e = Clarifying what content will be covered (and what will not). e Finding agreement on how learning will happen during this event. e Clarifying the different roles of trainer and learner. The middle phase The aim of the middle phase is to make sure that partici- pants are fully, and most effectively, engaged in learning together. It is important to take certain design elements into ac- count in the middle phase. Here are some of the impor- tant principles to remember: e Move from the known to the unknown. e Start simply and increase the complexity of what you are training along the way. e Draw on learners’ life experiences and encour- age them to draw out lessons and apply them in the safe environment of the programme. e Allow for the fact that different people have dif- ferent learning breakthroughs at different times. e Accommodate different people’s learning styles by using a range of exercises and techniques while working with the same content. Managing individual learning in the context of a group and the dynamics that take place in a group is an extremely important task for the trainer in the middle phase. Here are seven tasks on which a trainer has to work in the middle part of the training process. |. Keep the tone of the workshop open and ex- ploratory, rather than drawing conclusions too early on. 2. Let‘ahas’ happen at a personal level without imposing them on the whole group. Adults are responsible for their own learning and for what they choose to share with the rest of the group. 3. Encourage participants to air their own views on issues. 4. Invite creativity and innovation. 5. Nurture qualities of receptiveness and deep listening. 6. Watch out for group ‘think’. This is when every- one is so comfortable with one another that no one thinks critically or originally. 7. Accommodate different levels of interpersonal sharing. Some people are comfortable about opening up within groups and talking quite deeply about themselves and their lives. Others are not, and should be able to make an independ- ent choice about how much to share without being judged by trainers or fellow learners. Managing the group dynamics is also about watching the energy level of the group. Pay attention to people’s verbal and nonverbal signals, which may tell you when people are losing focus. Once you notice that energy levels are low, do not ignore them.Address them by allowing a short break, inviting people to stretch or asking for a participant to lead the group in an energiser. Another important aspect of which trainers have to be aware (and make use of) is the level of diversity in the group. This is especially relevant when working in plenary. Diversity feeds energy. If everyone thinks the same way, there is no debate or challenge, and therefore no move- ment. It is important to remember that diversity comes in many forms, including learning style, personal history, values, gender, ideology, religion, culture and age. Plenary discussions are a common feature of the mid- dle phase of a programme. The following tips are helpful for managing these. e Ask open-ended questions. e Always acknowledge an individual's contribu- tions and find constructive ways to build on and further develop them. e Allow the group to respond to a participant's question or answer. e Allow for silence and enough time for people to think through their responses. e Explore what is happening in the group at a cer- tain moment in the process. e Summarise and then move on. Establishing learning subgroups is also a common feature of the middle phase and trainers have to be aware of how they establish groups for different learn- ing purposes. Working in small groups allows for a higher level of participation than is possible in plenary, and more intensive work can be tackled. Below are four different kinds of learning situations that you as a trainer may have to manage. We also offer tips on how best to organise these situations, using subgroups. e Exploring issues at a value-based and emotional level. For learning to happen at this level, there has to be a quite deep and intimate sharing and self-disclosure between participants. This requires a certain level of trust and safety. In this scenario, 52 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects participants should be allowed to choose whom they would share with. It is not a good idea for the trainer to assign people. Often this kind of learning works best in pairs. e Discussing and/or developing models and theory. Here it is useful to form groupings of people from varied backgrounds with diverse opinions. This allows for generating a wide variety of ideas and for participants to draw on their different experiences. The size of the subgroup for this kind of work can vary widely, but between four and six participants per group is manageable.A larger group requires more time to deliberate. A random selection method, such as counting people off, may be best in this situation. e Ina scenario where the participants will be prac- tising new skills or capabilities, it is useful to form subgroups with mixed capabilities so that partici- pants can learn from one another. It is important not to form one group full of experienced peo- ple and another with complete beginners. This also allows the subgroups to work at a similar pace and increases the likelihood that they will finish the task at more or less at the same time. The trainer will have to take responsibility for assigning people to subgroups. e Applying learning in a person’s own context is another subgroup scenario. Here it is important to form talking partners or groups of three, made up of people from the same or similar organisations/fields. This helps participants to ground their learning in the reality of their own context. Participants can be encouraged to form their own groups if they are familiar with fellow participants’ contexts and fields of interests. Some guidelines to enhance learning in subgroups: e Circulate a clear set of instructions that spell out the content to be covered and the process to be followed. e Ensure that there is an appropriate space for subgroups to break away and meet. It must not be too far away from the central training area. e Supply the groups with appropriate materials such as flipchart paper, marker pens and cards. e Make sure each group knows what output is expected from them and how they will or will not integrate their output with the output from other groups. e Make and show a summary of the ground rules that must be honoured to ensure effective and efficient participation in groups. Closing the learning groups A training situation is a laboratory. It is often very dif- ferent from the real context in which participants work or live. This is why the participants have to be given an opportunity to plan how they will re-enter their normal work and life situations. Another reason why closure is important is that participants use the training process as a safe space in which to open up issues they may not have explored before. It is necessary for trainers to ensure that participants reach some conclusion about any unfin- ished business. Proper closure also makes it more likely that learning will be sustained and result in change in the participant's life or work situation. What has to be closed at the end of a training pro- gramme? e Areas of content that have been explored. This can be achieved by holding a session in which people can ask any outstanding questions they have about the content or preparing a summary/ roadmap of the material covered or asking the participants to present their own summary of the content of the programme. e Relationships between group members. This can be done by giving one another feedback or symbolic gifts, by holding a celebratory party or asking participants to characterise the group in whatever way they choose. e The relationship between the trainer and the group. This can be done by inviting feedback, cre- ating the opportunity to value the different roles of ‘trainer’ and ‘learner’ and affirming that both have learned from the experience. e Moving from being a full-time learner to the demands of multiple roles. This can be done by allowing time for the participants to reflect on and share with a talking partner what they left behind to come on the programme, how they may have changed while on the programme, how they feel about returning and what adjustments will be required to re-enter their roles. In a five-day programme, entry should take at least one session, and closure would require the same amount of time. This also depends on the participants in the group, the type of content and the level at which the pro- gramme was pitched. Some programmes are designed to be residential so that a very close learning group can develop.A programme of this nature may need more time for both entry and closure. The following two examples of outlines for training programmes will further illustrate the points made above.A brief summary of the problem and the learning needs of the different groups will be given, to help you contextualise the example and the objectives for the programme, followed by a programme outline or timeta- ble. Such outlines are helpful to share with participants. The programme outline should give participants an idea of how the day/s are structured and broadly what will be covered in each session. Providing a more detailed programme tends to limit the trainer’s scope for being flexible and makes some participants very anxious about falling behind. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Example}i-{A(one-day/programme)forleadersotcBosinthe CFREnvironmentallCBO) The network offers a number of small grants to member CBOs for developing the capacity of their members. Very few leaders of CBOs apply for these grants, and the few applications received are not very clear and poorly written. At the end of this one-day workshop CBO leaders will have: e Clarity about the rationale and criteria for the small grant applications. e Explored what capacity problems exist among their membership. e Understood the steps to follow in designing a small project. e Applied their understanding of these design steps. 08:30 to 10:00 10:30 to 12:00 13:00 to 14:30 15:00 to 16:30 Introductions An overview of the Project design Appraising the project seven steps of LFA designs People: Planning Development objec- tive. - How will you know Immediate objective. what the project has achieved? Name. Organisation. Problem analysis Outputs. Organisational e What are the capac- Activities. e achievement. P Summary and evalua ity problems facing tion and closure of the member CBOs? Assessment of assump- | day Purpose: Cons : Problem Tree. e Expectations. e Objectives and pro- Objectives analysis gramme. Process: How we will learn. Rationale and criteria for small grants The project manage- ment cycle Exampley2:7A\three-day/programme)forprojectimanagers Problem statement: Project managers from different government departments and members of the environmental cluster are responsible for initiating, appraising and monitoring projects that will mainstream the issue of biodiversity and the need to con- serve or restore it in the CFR. They have no experience of participatory planning processes and have an inadequate understanding of the different steps necessary when designing a development project. Their understanding of biodiver- sity is basic. At the end of the three-day programme, project managers will have: e A clearer understanding of how to mainstream the issue of conserving biodiversity in all development projects. 54 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects e Deepened their understanding of biodiversity. e Increased their understanding of the steps involved in the LFA to project planning. e Used and practised some participatory tools. 08:30 to 10:00 Day |: Session | Introductions People: Name. Organisation. Concern for the envi- ronment. Purpose: e Questions on which to work. e Objectives. e Programme. Process: How we will learn? Environmental main- streaming How do we do environ- ment-sensitive develop- ment? Day 2: Session | New insights and ques- tions An open conversa- tion which includes the iterative nature of the approach. Group process How do individuals learn best in a group and what is needed from other participants? Small groups work on setting themselves process guidelines. 10:30 to 12:00 Session 2 Project approach to development Overview of the LFA to project planning Stakeholder analysis Who has to be involved to ensure mainstreaming? What are their different interests? Session 2 Objective analysis Present and demonstrate step. Small groups continue to work on an objectives tree. One group presents and gets feedback. Debrief the step. Alternatives analysis Present and demonstrate. 13:00 to 14:30 Session 3 Problem analysis Read case study. Present step and dem- onstrate the tool of a problem tree. Small groups develop a ‘problem tree’. Session 3 Alternatives analysis (continued) How to think out of the box, picture solutions and ways to get there. Small groups do an alter- natives analysis. One group presents and gets feedback. Debrief the step. A pictorial overview of development through a project or planned intervention 15:00 to 16:30 Session 4 Problem Tree exercise (continued) One group presents and receives feedback. Problem analysis step: debriefing. A look ahead at Day 2 and a review of the past day. Session 4 Project design Present and demonstrate the three objective levels (Development, Immedi- ate objectives and Project outputs). Groups develop their own set of objectives. One group presents and gets feedback. Debrief the step. A look forward to Day 3 and a review of the past day. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Day 3: Session | New insights and ques- tions An open conversation that includes ideas about how to design a sound yet in- novative strategy. Assessing the assump- tions Present and demonstrate the step. Small groups work on assessing the assumptions for their projects. One group presents and gets feedback. Debrief the step. Session 2 Developing the indica- tors Present and demonstrate the step. Small groups work out indicators for the three levels of objectives. One group presents and gets feedback. Debrief the step. Session 3 Operational planning (Activities, inputs and budgets) Present and demonstrate the step. Group work on an aspect of the operational plan. One group presents and gets feedback. Debrief the step. Small-group closure 55 EE ee eae mmlll__ Session 4 Participation Who participates in the different planning steps and how to facilitate. What form will carry the project? A discussion about the importance of planning for the formation and opera- tion of a project team. Summary, evaluation and closure Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 57 LOGICAL FRAMEWORK EXAMPLES FROM THREE CEPF-FUNDED CAPE PROJECTS 3.1 Mainstreaming biodiversity on the Cape Flats—building good practice in sustainable management NARRATIVE SUM- MARY Long-term Goal State- ment The unique biodiversity in the urban lowland frag- ments of the Cape Floris- tic Region is conserved in a way that benefits people of the Cape Flats and is embraced as a valuable element of urban life in line with the Integrated Metropolitan Environmen- tal Policy and Biodiversity Strategy of the City of Cape Town. PERFORMANCE IN- DICATORS Targeted Conservation Outcomes 97% of 2002 base- line lowland priority areas remains untrans- formed by 2008. 5% increase in area under conservation management in prior- ity areas by 2008. 100% increase in 2002 baseline jobs directly associated with conservation and nature-based tourism by 2008. 50% increase in recreational use of protected areas in the CFR by South African citizens. 10% annual increase in school children who visit biodiver- sity education centre programmes. MEANS OF VERIFICA- TION Means of Verification State of Biodiversity Report. Reports of the Cape Co-ordination and Implementation Com- mittees. Conservation agency reports. Visitor statistics for a representative sample of protected areas. Visitor statistics of biodiversity education centres. IMPORTANT AS- SUMPTIONS Important Assump- tions Government is com- mitted to biodiversity conservation at high levels and line agen- cies are required to comply with directives to incorporate biodi- versity into planning and to collaborate through the mecha- nisms established. Government institu- tions will have the ca- pacity to integrate and implement forward plans efficiently. There is private sector investment in sustainable biodiver- sity-based business. Communities willing to engage in oppor- tunities developed in protected areas and sufficient capable civil society organisa- tions are available and willing to undertake C.A.P.E. activities. Provincial educa- tion authorities and partners are commit- ted to implementing biodiversity educa- tion programmes at schools. 58 Project Purpose (short-term impact) Sustainable conservation management of sites in the biodiversity network of the City of Cape Town is achieved through active partnerships between government, the private sector and community- based organisations. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Purpose Indicators Purpose | By the end of the project, a new cohort of skilled people-centred urban con- servation managers from the Cape Flats has secured sustainable conservation management at four pilot sites. Purpose 2 By the end of the project, local leadership drives community conservation efforts at four pilot sites on the Cape Flats and is starting to emerge at an additional two sites. Purpose 3 By 2006 (q4), Cape Flats Nature Trust provides an appropriate financial vehicle and institutional structure, and has raised at least $1.5 million, to sustain work of Cape Flats Nature until at least 2012. Purpose 4 By 2005 (q4), Cape Flats Nature Trust and the value of its work is recognised by Capetonians. Purpose 5 By the end of the project, the people of Cape Town, particularly the Cape Flats, have experienced and value the four pilot sites, and are knowledgeable about and support conser- vation of the area’s unique biodiversity. Purpose 6 By 2004 (q4), vibrant environmental education programmes stimulate the use of sites as outdoor classrooms and improve the quality of education. Purpose 7 By 2005 (q4), the four pilot sites contribute eco- nomically to the surround- ing townships by attracting local, national and interna- tional visitors. Means of Verification Area managers’ reports. Project evaluation. Partnership projects. Project reports. Champions’ Forums attendance register and proceedings. Project reports Financial reports. Council resolution. Media reports. Financial reports. Visitor figures. Media reports. Project reports. Figures for use by educa- tors and learners. Project reports. Project evaluation. Visitor figures. Project reports. Project evaluation. Important Assump- tions Funds are raised to sup- port continued employ- ment of the urban conser- vation management team and operational costs into the future. Reasonably low turnover in community leadership allows capacity to be built. There is a large enough market for tourism to the townships that can be attracted through the pilot sites. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 59 Project Purpose Important Assump- (short-term impact) Purpose Indicators Means of Verification ; tions Purpose 8 By 2005 (q4), the four pi- lot sites are recognised as contributing to quality of life (education, health and wellbeing, economically) in surrounding townships. Media reports. Council resolution. Purpose 9 Resources allocated from By the end of the project, | local, provincial and na- leadership in government | tional government. recognises that biodi- versity conservation is essential for sustainable development on the Cape Flats, is prepared to act on this knowledge and un- derstanding, and provides ongoing political support for Cape Flats Nature. Participation of politicians in project activities. Purpose 10 Council resolutions. The City maintains ongo- By 2006 (q2), the City ing commitment to its of Cape Town takes and Integrated Metropolitan implements policy deci- Environment Policy and sions to lead public/private Biodiversity Strategy. partnerships for biodiver- sity conservation on the Cape Flats. Resources allocated for conservation on the Cape Flats. Purpose || Project reports. The City maintains ongo- By the end of the project, ing commitment to its lessons learnt at four pilot Integrated Metropolitan sites have been captured, Environment Policy and shared widely and are im- Biodiversity Strategy. plemented in the City of Cape Town’s biodiversity network, in other towns and cities in the CFK, and beyond. Council resolutions. Project media. Presentations at City, national and international forums. Reports from other towns and cities. Important Assump- Project Outputs Output Indicators Means of Verification iene Output indicator | Output indicator |.| Annual conservation man- Sustainable conservation User-friendly annual agement plans. management is demon- conservation manage- Area manager reports. strated at four pilot sites ment plans developed in within the City of Cape consultation with sur- Town’s biodiversity con- rounding communities servation network: Edith and implemented, drawing Stephens Wetland Park, on expert advice where Harmony Flats Nature Re- | necessary, at two sites by serve, Macassar Dunes and | 2004 (q4), and at all sites Wolfgat Nature Reserve. by 2005 (q4), 2006 (q4). 60 Project Outputs Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Output Indicators Output indicator |.2 Partnership projects with local communities plan and implement the follow- ing actions that contribute to the management of the sites annually, based on the annual conservation management plan and an evaluation of the previous year’s activities, by 2004 (q4), 2005 (q4), 2006 (q4): e Alien clearing at four sites. Flora monitoring at one site. Bird monitoring at one site. Fire prevention mechanism in place at two sites. Regular litter clearing at one site. Output indicator 1.3 Interventions aimed at minimizing threats and maximizing benefits through integration into new local development initiatives developed and implemented at one site by 2005 (q2) and another site by 2006 (q2). Output indicator |.4 Infrastructure needs identified in consultation with the surrounding com- munities, and funding and construction catalysed at two sites by 2004 (q4) and at all sites by 2006 (q4). Output indicator |.5 Infrastructure use policy developed in consultation with the surrounding com- munities and implemented at one site by 2004 (q2) and at all sites if appropri- ate by 2006 (q2). Output indicator 1.6 Cape Flats Nature Trust established by 2004 and funds raised to support Cape Flats Nature for a further five years (2007— 2012) by 2006 (q4). Means of Verification Partnership briefs and contracts. Project reports. Project reports. Project reports. Infrastructure use policy document. Project reports. Trust Deed. Financial reports. Important Assump- tions Community partners can be found and/or developed to implement conserva- tion projects. Stakeholders in local development forums and processes are open to working with Cape Flats Nature. Agreement is reached on infrastructure needs and funds are raised for infra- structure development. Individual Trustees remain committed to this project and City remains commit- ted to taking responsibility for nature conservation in the City by investing resources. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Project Outputs Output indicator 2 A new cohort of skilled urban conservation man- agers and champions from surrounding townships es- tablished to conserve the biodiversity of the Cape Flats, and is supported by Cape Flats Nature to im- plement all other outputs. Output indicator 3 Campaign conducted to gain broad support for conservation of the four pilot sites and for the work of Cape Flats Nature through awareness rais- ing, promoting use of the sites by the people of the Cape Flats, and securing benefits from biodiversity conservation for the local communities surrounding the pilot sites. Output Indicators Output indicator 2.| Cape Flats Nature’s team strengthened to support further project implemen- tation by employing an administrator and Capac- ity Building Manager by 2003 (q4) and securing the continued employment of the Project Manager from 2005 (q2). Output indicator 2.2 A future urban reserve management team of six members at varied levels (e.g. self-taught, students, graduates, experienced) is employed and seconded to the City by 2004 (q2). Output indicator 2.3 Quarterly Champions’ Forums enable site drivers and partners to share experiences, draw lessons and build skills in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007. Champions’ Forums proceedings. Output indicator 2.4 Volunteer support and re- ward system is piloted at one site by 2004 (q4) and implemented at all sites as appropriate by 2005 (q4). Volunteer support and Project report. Output indicator 2.5 Contracts. Skilled specialists contract- ed to support activities including fundraising, tour- ism development, market- ing, process facilitation, environmental education development and evalua- tion. Partnership briefs and contracts. Output indicator 3.1 At least one popular activity is planned and implemented in partner- ship with local communi- ties at each site annually to attract people from the surrounding commu- nities, particularly youth (in and out of school), to ensure that the sites are used appropriately, and/or to overcome barriers to participation, e.g. safety, by 2004 (q4), 2005 (q4), 2006 (44). Project reports. Means of Verification Employment contracts. Employment contracts. attendance register and reward policy document. 6l Important Assump- tions The City remains commit- ted to the implementation of the Biodiversity Strate- gy, provides an operational budget for the team, and supervises conservation management work. Consistent attendance al- lows capacity to be built. It is possible to build a committed core of vol- unteers for conservation in a context of deep and widespread poverty and unemployment. Project Outputs Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Output Indicators Output indicator 3.2 A total of at least four community-based organi- sations with a common value base and that have not previously used the sites, are introduced to the sites by 2004 (q4) and 2005 (q4). Means of Verification Project reports. Important Assump- tions Output indicator 3.3 The profile of the four pilot sites and their unique natural attributes is raised through regular coverage in mainstream (at least two articles and two radio slots) and community media (at least four arti- cles and radio slots), and widely distributed project and site-level partner me- dia including a pamphlet and video for each site by 2004 (q4). Print media. Pamphlets. Videos. Project reports. NBI’s (later SANBI) Urban Conservation Programme retains the capacity to produce the videos. Output indicator 3.4 Cape Flats Nature Trust and the value of its work is recognised by Cape- tonians through regular coverage in mainstream (at least two articles and two radio slots) and com- munity media (at least four articles and radio slots), and widely distributed project and partner media [at least one article in partner publications, an annual project video by 2004 (q2), 2005 (q2), 2006 (q2), 2007 (q2), a project poster by 2004 (q4)], and a summary of the project's annual plan [2004 (ql), 2005 (ql), 2006 (qI), 2007 (qI)]. Print media. Videos. Poster. Annual plan summaries. Project reports. NBI’s (later SANBI) Urban Conservation Programme retains the capacity to produce the videos. Output indicator 3.5 The capacity of educa- tors to use the sites is enhanced through the participative development of learning points, activi- ties and materials, and the provision of training and support on-site at two sites by 2004 (q4), and at all sites by 2005 (q4). Education materials. Project reports. Funds are raised to enable this work. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Project Outputs Output indicator 4 Advocacy campaign con- ducted to secure support for biodiversity conserva- tion on the Cape Flats at all levels of government and lobby, particularly local government leadership, around specific issues as necessary. Output Indicators Output indicator 3.6 A comprehensive en- vironmental education programme is catalysed, implemented at all sites by 2004 (q4),and promoted among educators and school principals annually by 2004 (q4), 2005 (q4), 2006 (q4). Output indicator 3.7 Interventions are identi- fied and implemented to overcome security risks, particularly for women and children, in part- nership with women’s organisations and other relevant forums from the surrounding communities at one site by 2004 (q4), two further sites by 2005 (q4) and the fourth site by 2006 (q4). Output indicator 3.8 Use of two sites for recre- ation and other purposes compatible with conserva- tion is measured by 2004 (q4), and increases by 2005 (q4) and 2006 (q4). Output indicator 3.9 Sustainable medicinal plant harvesting and/or culti- vation and/or nurseries linked to at least two sites by 2005 (q4). Output indicator 3.10 A minimum number of jobs and/or income gen- eration opportunities are created through conserva- tion management, alien clearing, and tourism initia- tives across the four pilot sites annually: 90 by 2004 (q4), 100 by 2005 (q4), 110 by 2006 (q4). Output indicator 4.1 Subcouncils, key party constituency offices and community development forums in areas around pilot sites, and key City Directors briefed annually on the work of Cape Flats Nature: 2004 (q2), 2005 (q2), 2006 (q2), 2007 (q2). Means of Verification Project reports. Letter of support from the provincial Department of Education. Intervention proposals. Project reports. Visitor figures. Project reports. Alien clearing contracts. Project reports. Partner reports. Project evaluation. Project reports. 63 Important Assump- tions The environment remains an important theme across learning areas in the school curriculum. Funds for alien clearing are available from national poverty relief and other programmes, funds are raised for tourism devel- opment work and there is a large enough market for tourism to the town- ships that can be attracted through the pilot sites. Annual briefings will mitigate high turnover in political leadership in the Western Cape. 64 Project Outputs Output indicator 5 Lessons for sustainable urban conservation man- agement practice from the work of Cape Flats Nature at four pilot sites are captured and shared, and approach of Cape Flats Nature is introduced at two additional sites in the City within the context of a roll-out strategy for the City’s biodiversity network. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Output Indicators Output indicator 4.2 Concise briefing docu- ments about biodiversity conservation on the Cape Flats and its benefits for townships developed and distributed annually to politicians and officials by 2003 (q4), 2004 (q4), 2005 q4, 2006 (q4). Output indicator 4.3 Annual site tours for City leadership and other politicians conducted to promote and provide information on the work of Cape Flats Nature at the four pilot sites, and conservation on the Cape Flats by 2003 (q4), 2004 (q4), 2005 (q4), 2006 (q4). Output indicator 4.4 Politicians invited to at- tend at least five events spread across the sites each year by 2004 (q4), 2005 (q4), 2006 (4). Output indicator 4.5 City Council resolutions secured strategically to support the work of Cape Flats Nature, e.g. forma- tion of the Cape Flats Nature Trust in 2004 (q1), recognition that sustain- able management has been demonstrated at the four pilot sites and approval of roll-out strategy in 2006 (q!). Output indicator 5.1 Ongoing monitoring and evaluation system in place by 2003 (q4). Means of Verification Briefing documents. Site tour information packages. Project reports. Print media. Project reports. Council resolutions. Document outlining monitoring and evaluation system. Important Assump- tions Annual site tours will mitigate high turnover in political leadership in the Western Cape. Existing and new council- lors remain committed to the City’s Integrated Metropolitan Environment Policy and Biodiversity Strategy. Project Outputs Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Output Indicators Means of Verification Output indicator 5.2 Annual evaluation con- ducted involving stake- holders at sites in the process by 2004 (q3), 2005 (q2), 2006 (q3), 2007 (q2). Stakeholder workshop reports. Evaluation reports. Output indicator 5.3 Lessons and plans pre- sented at least once a year in the Cape Flats Flora working group / City Biodiversity Forum, relevant City committees, e.g. Nature Conservation Management, Environmen- tal Services and in broader forums such as Fynbos Forum in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007. Project reports. Papers. Booklet. Video. Output indicator 5.4 A ‘lessons on good prac- tice’ booklet and video from major midterm ex- ternal evaluation produced by 2005 (q3). Output indicator 5.5 A strategy is in place to replicate sustainable man- agement practice across the network as appropri- ate by 2006 (ql). Strategy document. Output indicator 5.6 City officials trained to implement sustainable management at other sites by 2006 (q3). Training attendance regis- ter and proceedings. Output indicator 5.7 Sustainable management is initiated at two additional sites in the biodiversity network by 2007 (q2). Project reports. Output indicator 5.8 WESSA and leadership in government in NMM are informed of lessons learnt through input in at least two meetings by 2004 (q4) and 2005 (q4), written reports and other project media. Project reports. 65 Important Assump- tions NBI’s (later SANBI) Urban Conservation Programme retains the capacity to produce the videos. Training for officials is only one element of the strategy to replicate sustainable management practice across the City’s biodiversity network. 66 Project Outputs Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Output Indicators Output indicator 5.9 Lessons learnt from four pilot sites shared with government leadership and implementing agents from other cities and towns in the CFR and be- yond through a workshop hosted by 2006 (q2). Output indicator 5.10 Leadership and imple- menting agents in other cities and towns in the CFR and beyond are informed of the work of Cape Flats Nature through input at three local government forums and conferences, e.g. World Parks’ Congress, South African Local Government Association by 2005 (q4). Means of Verification Workshop attendance register and proceedings. Project reports. Papers. Important Assump- tions Funds are raised for the event and/or participants will pay their own trans- port and registration costs to attend. Local government forums will be interested in having conservation issues on their agenda. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 67 3.2 Partnerships, co-operative management and incentives to secure biodiversity conservation in priority areas in the Cape Floristic Region NARRATIVE SUM- MARY Long-Term Goal State- ment By the year 2015, there will be no net loss of critically rare and threatened eco- systems and CFR endemic mammal species due to the operations of landown- ers, and key government agencies and civil agencies recognise the value and importance of retaining remnant ecosystems and corridors. Project Purpose Natural habitat on private and communal lands is con- served to establish lowland biodiversity corridors and complement the establish- ment of mega-reserves Project Outputs Output Indicator | Incentives action team (IAT) established. PERFORMANCE INDI- CATORS Targeted Conservation Outcomes Conservation plans and agreements are drawn up for all Broad Habitat Units (BHUs) with ir- replaceability of more than 0.6 by 2005. C.A.P.E. targets for BHUs with irreplace- ability greater than 0.8 are met by off-reserve conservation manage- ment by 2010. C.A.P.E. mega-reserve and lowland corridor target areas are under conservation manage- ment agreement by 2015. Purpose Indicators Purpose | Institutions and legislators give effect to co-operative management models and incentives within 5 years of project initiation. Purpose 2 Conservation agreements are adopted by landowners in priority areas. Output Indicators Output indicator |.1 Partnership formalised and signed. Memorandum of Understanding handed to the C.A.P.E. Co-ordinating Committee (CCC) by the end of project month |. MEANS OF VERIFICA- TION Means of Verification 1. C.A.P.E. and Incentives Action Team progress review. Means of Verification Government policy papers and programmes reflect incentive measures. Co-operative agreements are signed by key landown- ers. Means of Verification Memorandum signed. IMPORTANT ASSUMP- TIONS Important Assumptions Further incremental funding is available for C.A.P.E., agency capacity for incentives, plans and management agreements is retained. Government agencies support conservation management and pro- vide sufficient incen- tives to secure priority areas. Effective incen- tives and improved law enforcement outweigh landowners’ opportu- nity costs of alternative destructive land uses. Important Assumptions Political will exists to revisit policy and enable co- operative management. Changes in conservation authorities or socio-eco- nomic circumstances do not scuttle the building of relationships. Important Assumptions Key government stakehold- ers commit to specific in- centives. Suitable candidates who understand incentives or are willing to learn, present themselves. Suitable candidates with conservation, development and negotiation skills are found. Consensus on priorities can be reached between man- agers and scientists in differ- ent stakeholder agencies. 68 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Output indicator 1.2 IAT operating strategy : Consensus on priorities can Key project staff in place, © document. ‘be reached between man- -and roles and responsibili- ‘agers and scientists in differ- - ties are agreed and commit- : ent stakeholder agencies. ‘ted. Documentation handed : ‘to the CCC by the end of: : Most landowners are willing : project month 2. : :to negotiate or accept co- “management models. - Output indicator |.3 : Workshop held to identify :key stakeholders and work- : : shop proceedings handed :to the CCC by the end of ; project month 2. : Output Indicator 1.4 : Partnership agreement Strategic partnerships en- : document. :tered into with key stake- : holders and partnership ‘agreement document(s) : handed to the CCC by the :end of project month 4. : Output indicator 1.5 : Necessary infrastructure :and equipment procured by : : the end of project month 4. : : Output indicator 1.6 : Strategy document, training : : Training strategy and sched- : manuals. : :ule developed and strategy : : document submitted to the : : CCC by the end of project : :month 6. Training sessions : :and workshop proceedings: ‘submitted to CCC. Output indicator 2 : Output indicator 2.1 Appropriate co-operative : Co-operative manage- management models and in- : ment models and incentive centive schemes developed. : schemes needs analysis : revisited and refined. : Output indicator 2.2 : Additional models and : schemes developed to ad- : dress unmet needs. Report : :handed to the CCC by the : end of project month 7. : Output indicator 2.3 : IAT toolbox and operations : ‘Operational procedure —: manual. : manual developed and : delivered to the CCC by :the end of project month =o: Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Project Outputs Output indicator 3 Lobbying strategy for institutional and legislative reform in place. Output indicator 4 Priority areas for the estab- lishment of pilot projects selected. Output indicator 5 Pilot projects launched and co-operative manage- ment models and incentive schemes implemented. Output indicator 6 Package the lessons learned from co-operative manage- ment models and incentives schemes and promote them. Output Indicators Means of Verification Output indicator 3.1 Strategy development workshop held with key stakeholders by end of month 8. Policy option papers. Output indicator 3.2 Policy and legislative reform options and position papers presented to relevant insti- tutes and agency legislators. Output indicator 4.1 Identify possible pilot project areas from the CAPE lowlands project and the CAPE CPU by the end of project month 8. Output indicator 4.2 Stakeholder workshop held to select priority areas for pilot project establishment and proceedings submitted to the CCC by the end of project month 10. Priority area target maps with key landowner info database. Output indicator 5.1 Database developed and populated for selected pilot areas. Database developed by the end of project month 9) Output indicator 5.2 Two negotiators appointed by end of project month II. Output indicator 5.3 A negotiation strategy for the pilot areas is in place by the end of project month 12. Output indicator 5.4 Co-operative management models offered to all target landowners in each selected pilot area within 16 months of project initiation. Negotiator and extension officer reports. Lessons learned review report. Output indicator 6.| Uptake of incentive schemes and of co- operative management models assessed. Iteration at month 14 and report completed by end of project month 23. Output indicator 6.2 Budget assessment and revi- sion in months 8, 12 and 18. Promotions and roll-out strategy document and roadshow. Output indicator 6.3 Develop a marketing strategy for the further implementation throughout the CFR. 69 Important Assumptions 70 Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects 3.3 The C.A.PE. Threatened Plants Programme NARRATIVE SUM- MARY Long-Term Goal State- ment By 2020 the biodiversity of the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) is effectively con- served, restored wherever appropriate, and delivering significant benefits to the region. Project Purpose The status of threatened plant species in priority conservation areas of the CFR directly improved through conservation ac- tions effected by land- owner custodians and community groups. PERFORMANCE IN- DICATORS Targeted Conservation Outcomes The priority species and habitats defined as irreplaceable in the Cape are maintained. The Protected Area Network expands to include all areas identified in the Cape as irreplaceable. The levels of pro- ductivity measured in 2002 in indicator terrestrial (wildflower harvesting) and ma- rine ecosystems (total catch) are maintained. The gross revenue generated by the protected area system increases by 10% per annum. Purpose Indicators Purpose | At least six civil soci- ety groups in pilot areas continuing to monitor and promote the conserva- tion of threatened plant species. Purpose 2 All land use decision-mak- ing in the six pilot areas takes threatened plant distribution and status data into account. Purpose 3 At least |2 priority sites for threatened plant species under effective conservation management through actions taken by civil society groups. MEANS OF VERIFICA- TION Means of Verification C.A.P.E. monitor- ing and evaluation reports. State of CFR biodiver- sity report. Provincial State of Environment reports. Annual reports of conservation agencies. Reports of the C.A.P.E. Co- ordination and Imple- mentation Commit- tees. Means of Verification Data on threatened plants collected by civil society groups. Data layers on threatened plant distribution being used by land use planners in pilot sites. Sites with high concentra- tions of threatened plants are appropriately zoned. Management plans. IMPORTANT AS- SUMPTIONS Important Assump- tions Government is com- mitted to biodiversity conservation at high levels and line agen- cies are required to comply with directives to incorporate biodi- versity into planning and to collaborate through the mecha- nisms established. The National Biodi- versity Strategy and Action Plan supports effective conservation of the CFR. International funding is available for incremen- tal costs of biodiver- sity conservation. There is private sector investment in sustainable biodiver- sity-based business. Important Assump- tions Existing conservation organisations remain committed to work on off-reserve programmes with civil society groups. Land use policy places value on biodiversity and provides positive incen- tives for civil society to be involved in conservation. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Project Outputs Output indicator | Threatened plantsw programme set up and capacitated to work with Civil Society. Output indicator 2 Civil society in pilot areas aware of threatened plants and capacitated to conserve priority sites for threatened plant species conservation. Purpose 4 Management guidelines for threatened plant species in pilot areas determined. Means of Verification Output indicator |.1 Management and adminis- trative support system in place by the end of month 2: Operations manual. Output indicator 1.2 Training courses for workshop facilitation and project management undertaken by C.T.PP. staff by end of month 4. Certificates of participa- tion for training courses. Output indicator |.3 Strategic direction pro- vided by Project Advisory Committee (PAC) that meets monthly for the first 4 months and then 6-monthly. Minutes of PAC meeting. Output indicator |.4 Financial audits. NBI (later SANBI) financial management, responsi- ble for programme fund investment and accounting, operational from date of grant approval. Annual financial reports. Output indicator 2.1 Six civil society groups in priority C.A.P.E. areas identified and committed to work with the project by the end of month 4. Output indicator 2.2 12 new sites in the CFR have secure conserva- tion status with manage- ment plans incorporating threatened plant guidelines as a result of civil society projects in the six pilot areas by the end of year 3. Management plans. Records of activities from civil society groups. Output indicator 2.3 75% of private and com- munal landowners, on whose land threatened plant data were collected, are aware of the presence and status of these species by end of year 3. Important Assump- tions South Africa’s inflation rates do not sky-rocket during project implemen- tation. The rand does not signifi- cantly strengthen against the US dollar in the next three years. Civil society groups in pi- lot areas are interested in becoming involved and be- ing mobilised to conserve priority sites. Conservation organisa- tions can develop effective mechanisms for support- ing civil society involve- ment in conservation. Landowners change land use practice based on knowledge of threatened species occurring on their land. 72 Project Outputs Output indicator 3 Information on threatened plant species in the CFR updated and in an ac- cessible format for land use decision-making, Red Listing, and volunteer programmes. Output indicator 4 Guidelines for manage- ment of threatened spe- cies determined through monitoring and research, and threatened plant re- search capacity built. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Output indicator 3.1 Existing threatened plant information synthesised and spatially explicit data- base linked to Conserva- tion Planning Unit (CPU) set up by the end of month 6. Output indicator 3.2 Six civil society groups involved in data collec- tion in selected pilot areas from month 5 until end of project. Output indicator 3.3 Information gaps filled through specialist input and targeted fieldtrips by C.T.PP. staff throughout programme implementa- tion. Output indicator 3.4 Information on the dis- tribution and population status of threatened plants fed through to the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) Conservation Planning Unit and the NBI (later SANBI) Threatened Species Programme for National Red Listing. Output indicator 4.1 A minimum of |5 threat- ened species being moni- tored annually by students and landowners. Output indicator 4.2 At least three postgradu- ate students using data obtained from monitoring to determine management guidelines by the end of year 3. Output indicator 4.3 Research results synthe- sised into user-friendly management guidelines and fed into provincial and national biodiversity policy from year 3. Means of Verification CFR threatened plant database. CPU data layer. Field data forms com- pleted by civil society members. 6-monthly newsletters. Field data forms com- pleted by specialists and C-TRP'staft: CPU data layers. National Red Lists. Data forms completed by students. Popular and scientific publications. Local and national policy documents. Important Assump- tions CPU ensures that data collected are continually made available to civil so- ciety for land use decision- making. The Planning and Policy Directorate of NBI (later SANBI) uses findings of the C.T.PP. to input into national biodiversity policy development. Students will be interested and willing to conduct monitoring and take on postgraduate studies involving the establishment of management require- ments for threatened plant species. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects Project Outputs Output indicator 5 Project monitoring and evaluation system effective. Output indicator 6 Long-term funding for C.T.PP. secured. Output indicator 5.1 Project stakeholders including civil society data collection groups, landowners and conserva- tion officials participate in annual feedback, project evaluation and needs as- sessment workshop. Output indicator 5.2 Annual evaluation reports from TPP submitted to CEPF. Output indicator 5.3 Programme annually re- aligned according to needs identified. Output indicator 6.1 Additional funding secured by end of year 3 to allow for continuation of pro- gramme. Means of Verification Minutes of annual pro- gramme evaluation and planning workshop. Evaluation reports to GEPF Needs assessment docu- ment. Project proposals success- ful and funds committed. Important Assump- tions Threatened plant con- servation is regarded as a priority by donors. 73 / Cc DATE DUE APR_0O-9 70 2 Ly t em) ne MCZ ERNST MAYR LIBRARY UNA NR 4118 667 443 Biodiversity Series SANBI Biodiversity Series — . Conserving South Africa’s plants: a South African response to the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. 2006. C.K. Willis (ed.). ISBN 1-919976-28-0. 2. The Convention on Biological Diversity: biodiversity, access and benefit- sharing. A resource for teachers (Grades 10-12). 2006. A. Solomon & P. le Grange. ISBN 1-919976-30-2. is 3. The Convention on Biological Diversity: biodiversity, access and benefit- sharing. A resource for learners (Grades 10-12). 2006. A. Solomon & P. le Grange. ISBN 1-919976-31-0. 4. Fynbos Fynmense: people making biodiversity work. 2006. A. Ashwell, T. Sandwith, M. Barnett, A. Parker & F Wisani. ISBN 1-919976-29-9. 5. A plan for phylogenetic studies of southern African reptiles: proceedings of a workshop held at Kirstenbosch, February 2006. 2006. W.R. Branch, K.A. Tolley, M. Cunningham, A.M. Bauer, G. Alexander, J.A. Harrison, A.A. Turner & M.F. Bates. ISBN 1-919976-33-7. 6. Invasive alien flora and fauna in South Africa: expertise and bibliography. 2007. C.F Musil & |.A.W. Macdonald. ISBN 978-1-919976-35-8. 7. Project planning: tools for biodiversity conservation and development projects. 2007. Cape Action for People and the Environment. ISBN 978-1-919976-37-2. Other technical publications by the South African National Biodiversity Institute OQ Bothalia, a journal of botanical research. QO Strelitzia, a series of occasional publications on the southern African flora and vegetation. OQ Flowering Plants of Africa, a serial presenting colour plates of African plants with accompanying text. O Flora of southern Africa (FSA), taxonomic treatises on the flora of South Africa, Lesotho, Swaziland, Namibia and Botswana. Contributions also appear in Bothalia. Enquiries SANBI Bookshop, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa. Tel.: +27 12 843-5000 Fax: +27 12 804-3211 e-mail: bookshop@sanbi.org Website: www.sanbi.org. GLOBAL national ENVIRONMENT biodiversity FACILITY —— SANBI PARTNERSHIP FUND