yk 4 Mir zh aie iy BAY i te 1 WA SS SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY PUBLICATION NO. 1 HOUSES AND HOUSE USE OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS by RALPH L. BEALS, PEDRO CARRASCO, AND THOMAS McCORKLE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, INSTITUTE OF SociAL ANTHROPOLOGY, Washington 25, D. C., June 21, 1944. Str: I have the honor to transmit herewith a manuscript entitled ‘‘ Houses and House Use of the Sierra Tarascans,’’ by Ralph L. Beals, Pedro Carrasco, and Thomas McCorkle, and to recommend that it be published as Publication Number 1 of the Institute of Social Anthropology. Very respectfully yours, Juan H. Srewarp, Director. Dr. C. G. ABgBot, Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. ane SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY PUBLICATION NO. 1 HOUSES AND HOUSE USE OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS by RALPH L. BEALS, PEDRO CARRASCO, AND THOMAS McCORKLE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE + WASHINGTON : 1944 FOREWORD The Smithsonian Institution published recently Doctor Charles Upson Clark’s translation of the “Espinosa Manuscript,’ which he discovered in the Library of the Vatican.* This work contains the detailed report by a keen observer of conditions in Latin America as they were soon after the Spanish Conquest. The Smithsonian Institution’s Institute of Social Anthropology now begins to give an even more detailed account of life and conditions prevailing at the present time among the Sierra Tarascans in Mexico. It can readily be foreseen that not only may this study lead to improvement in these social conditions, but that it will be read by anthropologists of the future with the same type of interest which attracts them in the Espinosa Manuscript. C. G. ABBOT, Secretary, Smithsonian Institution, June 22, 1944. *Compendium and description of the West Indies, by Antonio VAzquez de Espinosa. Translated by Charles Upson Clark. Smithsonian Mise. Coll., vol. 102,862 pp. 1942. BLE CONTENTS PAGE TERT ENG pn ee ix MHONEIC NOs) 92-8 ane oe ee oo ee enemies x PITIRO MUCHO hee scons a ae oe ee 1 Theoretical background________-_-_------------ 2 Broporon the study s- 29 === 2 sesso n teen 5 Mhe Tarascan town_.....---.------------------ 6 whe town of Cherdn_....-...=--=-------------- 7 Building materials and their sources------------- 9 WOOUme te a tho S eek oes 9 INGODSIDIICKS 2a = see oe 5. oe eee seean 9 LODGE a eee eee 10 Muile;and brick= 22.25 ..< e255 ean ee Relation of houses to socia] and economic status - ~~ Uses of the’ Tarascan houses. 2--- == --22- ===. StOla gone = oe eee eee Sleeping and cooking ----==2--=_-_ = 22s House size and household size_.-_----------- Ceremonial and social functions related to the ‘Tarascan) NOUSé_ = 2422222525555 225s eee @eremoniesee=— 2. nese ea =n aaa Soolalitunctions=.22-2e5 eee 2-6 e == eae Relation of the Tarascan house to the environment- Coniparative data 2=—)_--- 2-222 =< se se=— ee History of the Tarascan house_...-.------------ Contemporary Tarascan housing problems-_------- PAGE ILLUSTRATIONS 8. Left: A well-built stone structure in Paracho with the wide eaves characteristic of Central Michoa- can, Right: Scene in a house-roofing fiesta in Cheran, PLATES (All plates at end of book) . Upper: Angahuan, showing the rectangular arrange- ment of streets and the large lots. Lower: A portion of the town of Chern. . Upper: Troje”’ in Angahuan. FIGURES Lower: A street on the outskirts of the town of Cherdn. PAGE . Right: Street near the plaza in Cherin. 1. Map of the modern Tarascan region________-- 5 Left: Two types of pole fence in Capacuaro. 2. Plan of a typical Chern lot in the southeast . Upper (left): Leveling the foundation beams for a house. SecllON aoe acoso eee 8 Upper (right): The ‘‘planchas” in position. 3. Old “‘troje”’ in Cherdn, said to have been built Lower (left): Placing one of the doorframes. before the Revolution _______-___._._____ 10 Lower (right): Laying the floor boards of a house. 4. Details of construction of the “troje” in figure . Upper (left): Simple kitchen under construction in 5 a ae eR ee epee 11 Cherian, ‘‘pie derecho.” 5. Two methods of notching wall planks_________ ll Upper (right): Two roof sections in place in process of 6. Methods of finishing doorframes, windows, and moving a Cherdn house. Piulers: - cnet se esas See Beers up] Lower (left): Arrangement of rafters in Paracho house 7. Details of roof construction__________ eee 12 without ridge pole. 8. Methods of attaching and laying shakes_-_____ 13 Lower (right): Old house in Paracho of unusual style. 9. Kitchen of simpler style (kosina térueri)_____- 15 . Upper (left): Kitchen of simple type with corner posts 10. Plan of ceiling in an elaborate kitchen (trdéja (Angahuan). kosfna) _--_--___- nad ot a 16 Upper (right): Kitchen of elaborate type (Angahuan). 11. Plan of floor of an elaborate kitchen (seen only Middle (left): Wooden ‘“‘troje’ at Ihuatzio, Lake im) PATE ChO) a eeeeee cena en ae ee eee 16 Patzeuaro. 12. A “chimenea,” or raised fireplace (seen only in Middle (right): Storehouse of style found mainly in STC HO) ees ee eee ee 16 Angahuan (imutakata). 13. Well-made masonry and adobe-brick wall in Lower (left): Large storehouse (imutakata) over gate. Cher ar ee ee ee cs ee 17 Lower (center); Storehouse (Gmutakata) with lower part 14. Plan of house of Pedro Chavez, Cherdn___-_--- 18 made into a room. 15. Fire hearth of stones_.-=2222222--2=2--_22-- 22 Lower (right): Storehouse (uak4li) in Capacuaro. 16. Utensils and furnishings commonly found in a . Upper (left): Mason at work in Cherdn. Cherankitchenes =. sense eee 22 Upper (right): Fairly elaborate roof construction at 17. Utensils commonly found in a Cherdn kitchen_ 23 Thuatzio typical of adobe structures. 18. Hollowed log with wooden cover used for stor- Middle (right): Gate roofed with tile (Ihuatzio). age of water outdoors______--_----------- 24 Lower (left): Stone house at Paracho with shake roof of 19. Representations of houses in the plates of the “troje’’ style. Relaci6n de Michoacdn_____-------------- 34 Lower (right): Thuatzio house with veranda, seen from 20. Distribution of types of houses according to the one end, Relaciones geogrdficas_..---.------------- 35 PREFACE The Institute of Social Anthropology is one of the many tangible responses to the growing sense of a need for closer cooperation and greater under- standing between the peoples of the United States and of the other American Republics. It was created within the Smithsonian Institution to carry out cooperative research and teaching in the field of social anthropology as part of the broad program of Cooperation with the American Republics under the State Department’s Interde- partmental Committee. The purpose of the Institute of Social Anthro- pology is to send scientific personnel to those countries which have expressed a desire to under- take a cooperative program of teaching and re- search in social or cultural anthropology. Social science methods are developed and a body of important data is obtained through university training of selected students followed by a period of field training in connection with a research project. The field program is carried out by the cooperating institutions, but other persons or institutions with special interest in the project are invited to collaborate, so that advantage may be taken of many diversified skills in subjects relevant to the problems. Research interest centers in broad, social science studies of selected communities which represent samples of the basic populations of the country in question. Such studies will be thought of as “anthropological” because they principally concern peoples whose blood is partly or wholly Indian and whose culture, though not. strictly aboriginal, contains an important element of indigenous practices and is often still organized in native patterns. But the studies are not re- stricted to preliterate cultures, which is the tra- ditional field of anthropology. On the contrary, they follow certain modern trends in the analysis of contemporary cultures, which they seek to understand in terms of the environmental, his- torical, and other processes that have produced 596082442 their modern content and organization and of the potentialities they contain for future change. An important part of the cooperative program of the Institute of Social Anthropology is the publication of research results. The publications will serve three purposes. First, the information they contain will contribute to a scientific for- mulation of the developmental and functional processes of culture. Particularly, it will con- tribute to an understanding of the formation of modern cultures. Second, the publications will provide specific and accurate data on which any successful action programs affecting the peoples concerned must be based. Third, they will afford an accurate picture of the peoples who constitute so great an element of many of the American Republics. Existing publications on these coun- tries represent them disproportionately in terms of the city dweller or of special classes. There are extraordinarily few books from which the general reader can obtain an adequate and scien- tifically accurate account of the diversified peoples of indigenous ancestry. One of the cooperative programs of the Insti- tute of Social Anthropology is with the Escuela Nacional de Antropologia of the Instituto Na- cional de Antropologia e Historia of Mexico. This program involves teaching anthropology, cultural geography, linguistics, and related sub- jects at the Escuela and field research among the Tarascan Indians of the State of Michoacan in Mexico. The research program for investigations among these Indians had already been formulated and partly carried out in recent years by the In- stituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia in co- operation with the Departamento Auténomo de Asuntos Indigenas of Mexico and the University of California. It is fortunate that the Institute of Social Anthropology will be able to further the work begun by these institutions not only by direct participation in the field research but by publishing some of the results already obtained. Ix The present paper, “Houses and House Use of the Sierra Tarascans,” by Ralph L. Beals, of the University of California; Thomas McCorkle, of Berkeley, California; and Pedro Carrasco, of México, D. F., is the first monograph to result from the work of the Instituto Nacional de Antro- pologia e Historia, the Departamento Auténomo de Asuntos Indigenas, and the University of Cal- ifornia. Future monographs on other aspects of the program will be published under various aus- pices as opportunity arises. “Houses and House Use of the Sierra Taras- cans” is also the fut of the publications of the Institute of Social Anthropology. Subsequent publications of the Institute will include papers covering the work in Mexico and_ elsewhere. These will be published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese, and in Washington, D. C., or in the country in which the research was done, as cir- cumstances dictate. Juuian H. Strewarp, Director, Institute of Social Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. PHONETIC NOTE The phonetic symbols used conform to the Tarascan alphabet approved by the Congreso de Filélogos y Lingitistas of Mexico in 1939 and employed by the Tarascan Project of the Departamento de Asuntos Indigenas. The alphabet is based on standard Spanish usage insofar as possible, with additional symbols added for Tarascan and with some clarification of the Spanish symbols as indicated below. The vowels a, e, 7, 0, wu have Spanish values. Spanish 7 and wu. The vowel a is intermediate between The consonants b, d, f, g, j, k, l, m, n, p, 7, s, and t have regular Spanish values. In addition the following symbols are used: ¢ is the equivalent of English or Spanish ¢s. é is the equivalent of English ch. 7 is used for the sound of English ng in 4 is intermediate between Spanish / and r. F is equivalent of Spanish rr. is equivalent of English sh. nn sing’. ¢‘, 6°, k‘, p‘, and ¢‘ are aspirated forms of the consonants given above, f, l, and 7 occur only in foreign loan words in Tarascan; b, d, and g occur primarily in words of Spanish origin but occur sometimes in purely Tarascan words. Houses and House Use of the Sierra Tarascans By Raurpx L. Brats, Pepro Carrasco, and THomas McCorkiE INTRODUCTION The present paper is the first substantial publi- cation resulting directly from the Program of Anthropological Investigations Among the Taras- cans. The Program originated as a cooperative undertaking entered into by the Escuela Nacional de Antropologia (formerly, Departamento de An- tropologia, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Bio- légicas del Instituto Politéenico Nacional, now part of the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia), the Departamento Auténomo de Asun- tos Indigenas, and the University of California. The program provided for the cooperation of other interested institutions, and the collaboration of the Institute of Social Anthropology is a logical extension of the plan. The general features of this Program are set forth in ‘The Tarascan Project: A Cooperative Enterprise of the National Polytechnic Institute, Mexican Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the Uni- versity of California,’ by Daniel F. Rubin de la Borbolla and Ralph L. Beals (Amer. Anthrop., vol. 42, pp. 708-712, 1940). Two short papers based on field research have already been pub- lished: ‘The Diet of a Tarascan Village,” by Ralph L. Beals and Evelyn Hatcher (Amer. Indigena, vol. 3, pp. 295-304, 1943), and “‘Games of the Mountain Tarascans”’ by Ralph L. Beals and Pedro Carrasco (Amer. Anthrop., vol. 46, pp. 516- 522, 1944). Other papers are in preparation. These include ‘Cherian: A Sierra Tarascan Vil- lage,” by Ralph L. Beals, which will appear as the second paper in the publications of the Institute of Social Anthropology. A number of other papers have also appeared which contribute to the objectives of the Program but which are the result of work which was undertaken independ- ently. These include: ‘Tzintzuntzan-Ihuatzio, Temporadas I y I,” by Daniel F. Rubin de la Borbolla (Rev. Mex. de Estud. Antrop., vol. 3, pp. 99-121, 1939), and ‘‘Exploraciones Arqueo- légicas Realizadas en el Estado de Michoac4n Durante los Anos de 1937 y 1938,” by Jorge R. Acosta (Rey. Mex. de Estud. Antrop., vol. 4, pp. 85-98, 1940). The purpose of the Program is to provide a coordinated and integrated plan of investigation of the Tarascan Indians for the dual purpose of: (1) Making a comprehensive scientific study of a little-known major Mexican Indian group, and (2) providing a body of fundamental data for the administration of the Tarascan area. For both purposes of the study, it is felt that certain non- anthropological studies are essential. As the Tarascans have been a farming and fishing people into a remote past, and since Spanish times be- gan have also been a woodworking and cattle- raising people, a thorough understanding of the environment and its potentialities is essential, not only in order to understand the past and present culture of the Tarascans, but also to provide an adequate basis for intelligent administration. To this end, geographical, botanical, and zoological studies are planned as well as a thorough soil reconnaissance followed by more detailed studies of agricultural methods, problems, and potential- ities, together with similar studies of forest, graz- ing, and animal husbandry techniques. In a similar fashion, understanding of the present population requires the collaboration of medical and public-health workers with the physical an- 1 2 INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. 1 thropologist. At the same time, understanding of briefly to envision a pooling of the techniques of the contemporary culture and the processes which led to its formation requires a knowledge of the Tarascan past. The Program consequently in- cludes plans for archeological research to illuminate the prehistoric period and for historical research to determine the events of the Contact, Colonial, and Republican periods. Put in another way, the Program may be said all the various branches of anthropology with those of the other social sciences and the more pertinent natural sciences to the end of understanding the Tarascans and their past and present problems as fully as possible. The Program is anthropological only insofar as anthropology provides the central core of essential studies and is the integrating discipline. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND The present paper is a frankly experimental effort to reconcile scientific and applied objectives in anthropology. The Tarascan Indians of Mi- choacadn, Mexico, are one of the large Indian groups of that country and so are the object of great con- cern on the part of governmental agencies devoted to Indian problems. Housing is one of the usual subjects considered in programs of social welfare and, hence, is a suitable topic for discussion from this point of view. On the other hand, the Tarascans are very little known scientifically. Housing, as one of the important aspects of cul- tural activity, is, therefore, a legitimate subject of scientific study. The problem is whether these two purposes may be combined, either in the process of field study, or in the manner of presenta- tion of data, in such a way as will be useful and satisfactory to individuals interested in either subject. Interest in applied, or “practical,” anthropology has been increasing in recent years among large numbers of anthropologists. In Mexico, results capable of application have long been regarded as one important end of all anthropological research in the country, although it must be confessed that there has been more tendency to consider purely scientific research to be a necessary prerequisite to the adequate solution of practical problems than has been the case with administrators in the United States. In the United States, the growth of inter- est in applied anthropology is evidenced in the recent birth of a journal devoted to this subject. Moreover, many anthropologists who have been reluctant to concern themselves with practical problems in studying the Indians of the United States, have confessed that it is undesirable and perhaps impossible to ignore the practical prob- lems in such countries as Mexico where the Indian question vitally affects the entire national welfare. It would, consequently, seem important to attempt a reconciliation of the objectives of “‘pure,’’ or “scientific,” anthropology and ‘applied,’ or “practical,’’ anthropology. As this paper will attempt to reconcile the two different approaches, a consideration of the ab- stract problems involved seems desirable. It is obvious that scientific ends in anthropology are often varied in character, but all depend to some extent upon the primary problem of description. It is obviously impossible to discuss anything re- lated to Tarascan housing without first knowing its characteristics. Description, then, necessarily provides the raw data for any scientific objective. The amount of description necessary to any par- ticular objective may, of course, vary, but unless a precisely limited problem is set in advance, the fullest possible description is apt to be of the widest use to the most people. To the applied field, de- scription is likewise necessary. We cannot decide whether a people are adequately or poorly housed until we know how they are housed, what natural resources are available, or are used, and what skills exist for the utilization of these resources. So far, then, we may say in general that description of housing and house use is necessary both to ap- plied and to scientific objectives, even though the amount and kind of description needed conceiva- bly may vary. As indicated, scientific study may be directed toward several objectives. One scientist may set himself the problem of discovering the history of the Tarascan house type, another may wish to learn the history of the Tarascan wse of the house rather than the history of its construction. Yet another may wish to know what the functions of the house are within the total culture partly or HOUSES OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS—BEALS, CARRASCO, McCORKLE 3 wholly aside from its use for shelter or storage, or he may wish to study the interrelations of the house and its use with other aspects of culture. It is possible, for example, that houses may represent prestige values or be symbols of status quite apart from any utility they may have. Yet others may wish to study the house from the standpoint of culture change: how changes in houses occur or how they are occurring, the effect of a dominant culture in close contact with Tarascan culture upon housing, and so on, The foregoing suggests that an aspect of the scientific approach, aside from description, in- volves in part the setting of problems. However, this is not the exclusive property of the pure scientist; in the applied field, problems also exist or are set up. The nature and phrasing of the problems in the applied field, though, are apt to be different from those of the ‘‘pure”’ anthropol- ogist, although in many cases they may be closely similar. In the applied field, the problem may be: ‘To what extent is Tarascan housing suitable for the needs of the inhabitants?” A pure scien- tist could well ask a similar question, but his purpose in so doing would be different. The pure scientist asking a similar question probably would be doing so in order to ascertain how good a ‘‘fit”’ the Tarascan had achieved in his adaptation to his physical environment. The student in the applied field would probably go somewhat further. He would perhaps ask: ‘“‘ What other type of house would be better suited to the needs of the Taras- cans?” In addition, his final question might be either: ““‘How may the use the Tarascan makes of his present house be improved?” or “‘How may the Tarascans be induced to change to a better type of house?” Some of the questions of the applied anthropolo- gist superficially seem to be of quite different character from those asked by the ‘‘ pure” scientist, but it perhaps must be conceded that, theoreti- cally, at least, they are capable of scientific ap- proach. Even a problem involving change in use or type involves, for its successful solution, an understanding of culture processes and culture dynamics. At the same time, it is obvious that the applied anthropologist has introduced the whole field of values in his use of such terms as “suitable,” ‘needs,’ “‘better,’’ and ‘improved.’ It must at once be asked whether these value terms are capable of scientific definition or not. Before proceeding to the discussion of this point, it should be remarked that the pure scientist also frequently utilizes value terms in his work. Un- fortunately, the “‘pure’’ scientist all too frequently either ignores this fact or is completely unaware of it. I have already pointed out that, in some- what different context, the question, ‘‘To what extent is Tarascan housing suitable for the needs of the inhabitants?” could be a thoroughly respec- table question in pure science if the objective were to determine the relations of the Tarascans to their environment. Anthropological literature of excellent scientific repute is full of appraisals of the adaptations primitive peoples have made to their environments. Actually, every such ap- praisal requires the existence of some sort of value standard on the part of the anthropologist. If he is a “pure scientist,’’ however, he apparently considers himself above the necessity of explain- ing these values or else he takes them for granted. Actually, of course, he is often using ‘common sense.’’ Other things being equal, a house that keeps its inhabitants warmer in cold weather, most people will agree, is a better adaptation than one affording less warmth. For the “applied” scientist, however, such ‘‘common sense’ ap- proaches are not permitted. He must make his value statements explicit and justify them. Once an attempt is made to bring values into the open, the difficulties pyramid. How, for example, is one to determine what is “suitable?” An expression of an ideal on the part of the investigator usually will not be meaningful in terms of the realities of a given social situation. What is suitable housing is not alone a question of adjustment to climate. Realistically, what is “suitable” involves a complex balancing of what may be deemed most desirable taking into con- sideration such things as available raw materials, available technological skills, economic resources, and so on. It might be perfectly possible to arrive at the conclusion that, under given tem- perature and humidity ranges, a brick and frame construction with a slate roof, steam heat, modern plumbing, and a bedroom for every member of the family represents what is suitable, but among most Indian groups such as the Tarascans this 4 INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—-PUBLICATION NO. 1 would be mere fantasy at the present time. Not only would materials be lacking, but there would be an almost complete lack of skills available for the construction; economically, it would represent an unattainable ideal even for the wealthy, and the Tarascans would have no idea what to do with such a house if they had it. There are not wanting opinions that the estab- lishment of values is entirely too complicated a business to be feasible. This seems, perhaps, too drastic a view to take. Admittedly, it is not possible with our present techniques to arrive at a complete statement, and, for the purpose of the approach to be used in this paper, it is not par- ticularly necessary that we do so. What should be possible is to establish certain minimal stand- ards of value which will be generally accepted and some of which are susceptible of empirical deter- mination. In the Jast analysis, the decision as to how far beyond the minima it is desirable or feasible to go with respect to the Tarascans is a matter to be decided by administrative agencies in terms of the data which may be presented by research. This is, of course, begging the question of the ultimate establishment of desirable values, but, for the present, we wish only to establish the main categories within which value problems exist. Using these categories, it should be pos- sible for the scientist to present the problems and data in such a fashion as to serve the interests of both the ‘‘pure” and “applied”’ fields. The following categories of value problems are offered as representing the basic assumptions on which we may proceed: 1. A reasonable number of square feet of floor space and cubic feet of room space per person are necessary to good health. This assumes that good health in the popu- lation is a desirable goal, but we must make some assump- tions if this discussion is not to be unduly protracted. The amount of space needed should be possible of empirical determination by medical experimentation, taking into account variations in climate, living habits, clothing, and similar factors, 2. The degree of ventilation necessary for health may be determined. 3. The housing should be sufficiently dry to preserve not only the health of the inmates but any furnishings, food, or other belongings kept in the house, 4. If the climate demands, some method of providing heat is needed, conditioned again by clothing and living habits. 5. The housing should be rodent and inseet proof, again to protect health and property, Other factors of a more complex nature could be brought into this list. Any mention of esthetic satisfactions is also purposely avoided. It is hoped that, in the ensuing sections of the paper, it wil be demonstrated that data on Tarascan housing can be presented sensibly in terms of these problems relative to costs, materials, skills, habits, and economic resources. Such a presen- tation should make it possible for administrators to set goals, and at the same time permit the scientist to establish the relative adequacy of the Tarascan adaptation to environment more ex- plicitly than is usually done. It perhaps must be emphasized that in the last analysis any system of values or goals chosen must rest with the administrative agency or agents, not with the investigator. It is obvious also that these values may be unduly influenced by the cultural background of the agents. Thus, a southern Californian might show a predilection for frame and stucco construction (or, if he is sensitive, & pronounced antipathy to such con- struction), while a New Yorker might prefer brick, and a Mexican might lean toward adobe or lime and stone. Such problems lie outside the immediate scope of our purpose. Rather we are concerned with ascertainnmg whether the data may be presented with reference to problem cate- gories in such a way that the administrator can make a reasonable choice of values and a decision as to the means to be employed in achieving them. An additional question is whether these data may be presented in such form as to be scientific in character and to meet the needs of the scientist in the pure sense. This is really a dual problem. The first is whether the collection of data for the two ends may reasonably be combined. The second is whether the presentation of data can be combined in a single report. It is our impression that the latter is more difficult than is the first. In any case, we believe we are in a good position to make the attempt. Although some of the funds used in the field work were supplied by a govern- ment agency, the Departmento Auténomo de Asuntos Indigenas, absolutely no restrictions were attached to their use, and no efforts were made to influence the place or the direction of the study. We also have little direct personal interest in the solution of the problems posed and can have little hope of influencing any administrative decisions on value standards. Consequently, our attitudes toward values or goals should be relatively neutral. With this lengthy discussion of theoretical prob- lems, we turn now to the concrete attempt to put these ideas into practice. HOUSES OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS—BEALS, CARRASCO, McCORKLE 5) SCOPE OF In the 16th century, the Tarascans occupied the State of Michoac4n and some adjacent parts of Guanajuato, Jalisco, and Guerrero. Today they are reduced to part of central Michoacan, in- cluding the regions of Lake Patzcuaro, Zacépu, La Canada, and the Sierra. The present area extends from Lake PAatzcuaro on the east to near Los Reyes on the West, and from La Canada south to Uruapan (fig. 1). This study refers solely to the region where Tarascan is still spoken, and, more particularly, rs OO ZAMORA TARECUATO PATAMBAN SIBIO aM Wt PAMATACUARO® > "A PAN LONARAPAN® S.FELIPI Mac Los REYES zack cBeupo? : 6.FRANCISGO Zposrg 5: LOREYZO, ANGAHUAN ®PARANGCARICUTIRG ®°PAR, TANACO @ AHYIRAN pat PE RIBAH JUCUTACATO o TANGITARO @ TARASCAN TOWNS O MESTIZO TOWNS G CHIL sie Ak s. JosBSS ‘ UR APIGHO\ Peg PTURICUE CUTIN \ e TABE, AN THE STUDY to the Sierra. The town of Cheran is taken as the basis of investigation. Beals and McCorkle spent nearly 8 months in Cheran, in 1940-1941, although visiting other towns briefly. Carrasco spent some time in Cherén in January and February 1941, but spent most of his time in Angahuan, Capacuaro, and Chilchota. Carrasco also spent part of January and all of February 1942, in the field, working especially in Paracho, but visiting extensively in the Lake Patzcuaro region. ‘Towns visited for varying lengths of time 7 PUREPERO RAPAN ZACAPU JA REJERO GOENEO@ TEREMENDO mffyn0% eSEVINA Dy, a "Baran TEPACU, 2 ( XzInTZUNTZAN COMACHUEN 2X) EL SBMTZIO i B JANI i. y AJUNO @ Seibars Anbrzcusaro @ CUANAJO YS ZIRA HUE} 4 / ARIO TACAMBARO ° ce) ROAD tHHt+ +++ RAILROAD Figure 1.—Map of the modern Tarascan region. 6 INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. 1 by one or more of the authors included the following: Sierra region: La Canada: Ahuiran Acachuén Angahuan Carapan Aranza Chilchota Capacuaro Hudncito Charapan Ichan Cheran Santo Tomas Cocucho Tacuro Corupo Tanaquillo Nahuatzen Urén Nurié Zopoco Paracho Lake Pdtzcuaro: Parangaricutiro Cucuchucho Paricutin Huecorio Patamban Thuatzio Pomacuardén Janicho Quinseo Jardcuaro San Felipe Tecuena San Lorenzo Tzentzénhuaro Tarecuato Tzintzuntzan Urapicho Tzurumttaro Zirosto Yunudn In the last area, information was also secured from residents of Cuanajo and Puécuaro, but these villages were not visited. Many informants were used, but those most employed in Cherin were Pedro Chavez and Agustin Rangel; in Parache, Maximino Estrada, master carpenter; and in Angahuan, the brothers José and Miguel Bravo. Tarascan words are written in the alphabet approved by the Consejo de Lenguas Indigenas. Unless otherwise indicated, Tarascan words are from Paracho or Cheréin (the two are only 6 miles apart, and dialect differences are slight). Spanish words are italicized, but if the word has a special regional meaning not found in standard dictionaries, it is placed in quotations and the meaning is explained the first time the word is used. Names of towns are in the local Spanish spelling. THE TARASCAN TOWN Tarascan towns tend to be located on level, or relatively level ground. Exceptions are found only in a few villages located in the higher moun- tains such as Quinseo, Cocucho, and others. Ex- cept where the irregularities of the terrain prohibit, the towns are subdivided by streets forming rec- tangular blocks oriented approximately to the compass points (pl. 1, upper). This is undoubt- edly a reflection of the Spanish origins of these towns; in many of the settlements traditions of former locations still exist. The blocks are sub- divided into lots, or solares, of quite variable size, which are used both as building sites and gardens. Usually, the lots are fenced, particularly on the side facing the street. Houses either may adjoin the street line or may be located well within the lot away from the street. In the center of the larger towns, structures are more apt to adjoin the street, but the doors of living quarters almost always open on the yard rather than the street. In the Lake region, the fishing villages tend to be on the edge of the water. As a result, some of the smaller villages, such as Tecuena and Yunuin, do not have streets but merely paths. Where the ground is very uneven, as at Janicho on the Lake and some of the Sierra villages, such as Urapicho, the plan is irregular and the streets have steps. If the town is of any size, it usually is divided into from two to four districts known as cuarteles, or barrios. The town tends to center on a, plaza, where usually is to be found a municipal building, the school, and the church, although the latter may not be directly upon the plaza. In most cases, a fenced cemetery exists before the church, but in some towns it has been replaced by a new cemetery on the outskirts. A stone cross still stands in the center of the cemetery in most towns. Two clearly defined types of construction exist in the Tarascan area: wood, and a combination of adobe bricks and stone masonry laid in adobe mortar. In the region of the Sierra, the majority of houses are of wood with shake roofs. Adobe- and-masonry construction with tile roofs predom- inates in the region around Lake Patzcuaro, the district of Zacdpu, the region known as La Cafiada, and the district of Zamora. The division, how- ever, is not absolute. Adobe-and-masonry struc- tures, sometimes with tile roofs, sometimes with shake roofs, are found in most of the towns of the Sierra, especially in the larger settlements and HOUSES OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS—BEALS, CARRASCO, McCORKLE 7 where Mestizo influence is marked. Nevertheless, in some towns, such as Capacuaro, almost the only nonwooden structure is the church. Struc- tures of wood also occur in the other districts, although they are relatively rare. The difference in materials used apparently has a geographic basis. The Sierra region has abundant forests, while often lacking sufficient water to permit easy manufacture of adobes or tiles. The other areas have abundant water, but the forests are distant. An exception is the Sierra town of Tarecuato, where, despite abundant forests and the relative scarcity of water, most of the houses are of adobe. In the Sierra it is also becoming increasingly difficult to secure materials for large houses. This fact, together with Mestizo influence, probably is contributing to the spread of adobe, or stone-and-adobe construction. THE TOWN OF CHERAN The town of Cherén lies at the head of a broad valley about 1,300 feet (400 m.) above the valley floor at an elevation of 8,500 feet (2,500 m.) (pl. 1, lower). The terrain slopes rather steeply toward the west. A small ravine forms the western half of the south boundary of the town; the eastern half of the south boundary lies beyond the ravine. A much larger ravine forms the north boundary of the town. A branch of this ravine runs through the town and partly isolates the northeast barrio, or cuartel. Springs at the bottom of this ravine afford part of the water supply. A pipe-and- wooden-trough system also brings water from a spring 9% miles (15 km.) away to cement tanks in the approximate center of the town as well as to a fountain in the plaza, which lies north of the center. At the northeast is a small cinder cone, which affords most of the stone used for buildings and fences. The town encroaches on the slopes of the cone on the east and south. The northeast barrio, or cuartel, climbs part way up the slopes of another cinder cone. Most of the streets of the town are oriented to the cardinal directions, and the central part of town is subdivided into rectangular blocks. In some sections irregularities of the terrain have led to modifications of the block plan; in these sections streets may follow the curving contours. Streets vary in width from mere pathways to about 40 feet (12.2 m.). In the heart of town they are often paved with small cobblestones and have a central drain or gutter. Stone-paved sidewalks are common in the middle of town. The main north-south street is traversed by the Carapan- Uruapan highway and was paved withoil macadam in 1940. The church, parish residence, school, and the municipal building all front on a central plaza. Except for benches and a fountain, the plaza is bare. Cement sidewalks and a surrounding paved area are contributions from the highway construction. The width of the building lots varies from 10 or 12 feet (3 to 3.6 m.) to almost an entire block. The depth in most cases is half that of the block, but in some cases it may be little more than 20 feet (6 m.). Asa general rule, however, except in the center of town, the lot is large enough for a small garden, a few fruit trees, and at least a small area devoted to growing types of corn not ordinarily cultivated in the fields (fig. 2). The size of lots varies appreciably, though, in various sections of town. ‘There is no general rule for placing the house upon the lot except in the center of town, where it usually abuts the street, es- pecially if it is of adobe-and-masonry construc- tion. If the house does not front on the street, a fence, generally of stone, is built along the street line. It usually is designed to keep out all animals including pigs, and customarily is above head height so passers-by may not peer over. The interior boundaries are also fenced, but the fences are often less substantial (pls. 2, lower; 3). The lots are all owned individually. They may be bought or sold freely and may be subdivided in various ways. A man with a large lot may sell a portion, creating two lots. Sometimes a man who may wish to enlarge his holdings will buy a strip from an adjoining lot or even the entire lot and merge the two pieces into a single lot. Heirs may also divide lots. INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. 1 BARRANCA CHERRY TREE CHERRY TREE AT YP Vea LOT STONE FENCE Gago i STRUCTURE LJ = ERECTED BETWEEN SEPT. and DEC. 5 CHOP BLOCK TROUGH WASH ROCK AH TE JSOCOTE a TREE z E Ww SNe fa) us < Ae pany WATER TROUGH B y Ficure 2.—Plan of a typical Cher4n lot in the southeast section. HOUSES OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS—BEALS, CARRASCO, McCORKLE 9 BUILDING MATERIALS AND THEIR SOURCES WOOD All wooden materials used in Cherén are pro- duced from local timber. The forests stand al- most entirely on public lands considered to belong to the town. Formerly, exploitation of any sort was open to all residents who had paid a small fee to an administrative committee. The fee was used to pay federal taxes on the land. Recently, the Department of Forestry of the Federal Goy- ernment has restricted exploitation of the forests for any purpose other than the collection of fire- wood to persons having permits. In Cheran this apparently will mean that persons wishing to cut lumber or shakes (or make charcoal) must join a local cooperative, for the Department of Forestry has refused to give permits to any other group or to individuals. In general, the cutting of lumber is done by specialists. Men who have no land or inadequate land or, in some cases, men who prefer the activ- ity, cut most of the timber and shape it into planks and beams. Shake making is even more special- ized, and men who make shakes may do nothing else except look after whatever farm lands they may own. Only a very poor person would attempt to cut the planks and beams needed for a house if he were not a specialist, but anyone might cut poles and stringers used in the roof construction. Woods used in house construction are pine and fir. Pine is most used and two types are dis- tinguished, red (iaaini), the heartwood of large trees, and white, the sapwood of large trees or wood from young trees. From these woods are made shakes, tejamanil, “‘vigas” (any piece over 2 inches (5 cm.) in thickness), and planks, or tablas.' Trees are felled and trimmed with the ax. To cut trees in sections, a two-handled saw is used called a “sardina.” Splitting is done with oak wedges and an oak maul. Large pieces produced in this fashion are sometimes dressed down with ax or adze. Planks, or tablas, are sawed with a long two- handled saw (k‘eréri asikutarakua). Logs des- tined for planks are squared with the ax, marked 1 The measure of length is the vara, which is divided in fourths or thirds. Each fourth contains eight English inches (20 cm.); so the vara equals 32 inches, or 81.28 cm. Fourths and inches are measured usually with the hand and . fingers, but the span is also used. by a chalk line, and then placed on a platform of poles, sometimes with a pit underneath.” Shakes, teyamanil, are made from both pine and fir. Fir shakes are preferred as they last longer despite breaking more easily. Trees used to make tejamanil must be straight-grained. The trunk is cut in sections with saw or ax; each sec- tion is then split lengthwise with wedges to pro- duce a number of pieces, usually 8, each 4 fingers wide at the bark edge. These pieces are then split into 16 shakes. A special machete is used to start the split, which is then completed with a thin metal or wooden tool. Several types of shakes are made. In Anga- huan, a shake 5 cuartas (40 in.) long and 7 inches wide is made to sell in Zamora and is called Zamorano. One shake 4 cwartas (32 in.) in length by 4 inches in width, called ‘little shake” (tasimbani sapirati), is sold in Uruapan, while one called “long shake’? (tasimbani iérati), 6 cuartas (48 in.) by 1 quarta (8 in.), is used in the town itself. Cheran, on the other hand, uses a shake called “thick shake” (tasAmani tidpiti), 5 cuartas (40 in.) in length. This is the size used in most ‘Tarascan towns. Shakes are occasionally sold by the hundred, but the most common unit is a bundle of 400 (irépita). Master carpenters may use an elaborate variety of modern tools for woodworking and house building. However, everything may be done in woodworking with ax, adze, saw, drill, chisel, and wooden wedges, and many persons work only with these tools. ADOBE BRICKS Adobe bricks are usually made from suitable earth near the village by specialists. The earth is mixed with manure and water to the proper con- sistency, then shaped in wooden forms. Two sizes of brick are made, one 3 spans long, one 2% spans long. Adobes are laid by a mason in a mor- tar of adobe and manure. Because of the moist climate, adobe walls always rest on a foundation of stone masonry laid in adobe mortar; the founda- tion may extend as much as half a meter (20 in.) below the ground surface. 2A fuller description of lumbering techniques will be given in a general monograph on Cherdn in preparation. 10 INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. 1 In some towns, dried pine needles (“huinomo”’), wheat, or oat straw are used in place of manure. In the Sierra, adobes are called adébi; in [huatzio, on Lake Paétzcuaro, iaudrukata. STONE Masonry is made of assorted-sized rocks brought from a quarry in the west side of the cinder cone on the northwest edge of town. The stone is a porous soft reddish lava, easily broken or dressed roughly with a hammer. It is carried from the quarry on burros. The rocks are used for all types of masonry walls. Usually large sizes are employed near the bottom and to make the ex- ternal faces of the wall; smaller stones are used to fill up the spaces, and usually all external surfaces are filled with small stone spalls set in the mud mortar. Large stones used for foundations are a hard gray lava from the arroyo north of town or from the slopes of a cinder cone northeast of town. The same rock is employed for finished pieces of stone work used as doorjambs, door corners, and bases for the pillars of verandas where these rest on the ground. TILE AND BRICK Tile and brick are little used. Some tile roofs are seen and tiles are sometimes laid over a shake roof when the latter is worn out. Both tile and brick are made from clay occuring near the town. The dry clay is brought to town on burros. The manufacture is carried on in an old chapel, and firing is in a kiln, both located in the church com- pound. The quality is poor and the demand is small. MISCELLANEOUS Adobe-and-masonry walls are commonly fin- ished on the inside and, less frequently, on the outside, with a coat of sand and lime plaster. This material is always imported. So, too, are the pigments used in whitewash or kalsomine finishes employed to decorate plastered walls. TYPES OF STRUCTURES WOODEN STRUCTURES Three main kinds of wooden structures are built. These are the ‘‘troje,”’ or house (tréja; in Angahuan, ¢arimba), really a storehouse in use, the kitchen (kosina), and sheds used for storing fodder or sheltering animals. Normally, a mas- ter carpenter is employed; he usually works for an agreed price and hires a helper. The “troje’”’ is a rectangular structure, nearly square, consisting of one room with a loft over it (fig. 3; pl. 2, upper). The door is always in one of the long walls and there is usually an overhang of the roof, supported on pillars, forming a veranda on this side. Usually the flooring of the first floor is extended to form a floor for the veranda (fig. 3; pl. 4, lower, left). The “‘troje,”’ or house, is elevated on large stones (or stone pillars in some towns), usually 9 in num- ber, one at each corner, one in the middle of each side, and one at the center of the floor. Upon the stones go four interlocking foundation beams, “polines” * (pi¢ekua), and a crosspiece destined to support the middle of the floor, the “atravesano de 3 Also “‘yarines,"’ because they are usually made of heartwood (iaaini). Ficure 3.—Old “‘‘troje” in Cheran, said to have been built before the Revolution. la tarima”’ (uandj¢éukua). The foundation beams are square, from a third to a fourth of a vara (about 8 to 10 inches) in cross section, but the crosspiece is thinner by the thickness of the floor boards. The two longest foundation beams and _ the HOUSES OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS—BEALS, CARRASCO, McCORKLE all crosspiece, ‘‘atravesatio de la tarima,”’ are placed first, then the two remaining foundation beams. The lower beams are notched at each intersection to half their thickness on the upper side; the upper beams are similarly notched on the lower side. Very frequently the front and back beams are notched to receive the ends of the floor planks (fig. 4; pl. 4, upper, left). POST BOTTON ze Floor Board Ficure 4.—Details of construction of the ‘‘troje’”’ shown on figure 3. Upon the foundation beams are placed the floor planks, ‘“‘tarima” (tagijpani) (pl. 4, lower, right). Upon the floor planks are laid one or two more beams, ‘‘planchitas.’”’ One marks the line of the front wall with the door. If there is a wooden floor to the veranda, a second, somewhat heavier beam is laid at the outer edge (pl. 4, upper, right). These beams are morticed to received tenons on the lower ends of the pillars of the veranda and the side frames of the door. The walls are of logs or, more commonly, of heavy planks set on edge. Both logs and planks are notched to interlock at the corners in the manner of the log cabin of North America and Europe. Assembling planks or logs in this fash- ion is spoken of as “‘to chain,” “‘encadenar.”” Two methods of notching planks are used (fig. 5). The number of planks varies somewhat according to the total size of the house. The door is 9 cuartas (72 in.) in height, and the front wall up to this point is made of short planks. When four or five planks are in place, giving the required height for the door, the side frames of the door CE Figure 5.—Two methods of notching wall planks. That on the right is more recent and is a tighter fit. (anamdrakua) are put in place (pl. 4, lower, left). Each frame has a tenon at the bottom, fitting into a mortice in the “planchita,” and a groove at the side to receive the wall planks. Various methods of completing the doorframe are used. The simplest way is to notch the top of the doorframes to receive a long plank extending across the front of the house. Sometimes this plank is ornamented with carving; in this case it may be cut so the lower part is red heartwood, the upper part white sapwood. More often, the doorframe is finished with one or even two special pieces, “arco de la puerta” (uiaimukua). These pieces are grooved to receive the upper wall planks (fig. 6). AER aaE Ficure 6.—Methods of finishing doorframes, windows, and pillars. If the veranda is floored, usually four pillars rest on the forward ‘“‘planchita.’’ The pillars are made of heartwood and are usually round but occasion- ally spindle shaped. Each end has a tenon, the bottom tenon fitting into the ‘‘planchita” (pl. 4, upper, right), the upper into a capital, zapata (fig. 6), or directly into a roof beam, “‘arco del portal” (uandzukua). If no capital is used, the roof beam is often carved into an arch between AY Ficure 7.— Details of roof construction. 2 INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. 1 B END CORNER RIDGE POLE RIDGE POLE CORNER END CORNER E CONSTRUCTION DETAILS a, Vent in roof of kitchen; b, lean-to kitchen built against an adobe wall with ventilation arrangement; c, two ways of finishing shakes at apex of an end roof section; d, arrangement of rafters in a small Cheran house; ¢, joining of rafters and ridge pole viewed from outside roof frame; and (above) same seen from inside roof frame. HOUSES OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS—BEALS, CARRASCO, McCORKLE 13 each pillar. In any case, carved ornamentation is common, often covering roof beam, capital, and even the upper part of the pillars (pl. 5, lower, right). The pillars at each end of the veranda usually have a groove to receive the ends of the side-wall beams. The topmost two wall planks and the beam above the pillars are usually one vara longer than the others, and the ends are cut into a curve and often carved. In addition, a special carved piece of red heartwood called a ‘“‘cornisa’”’ may surmount the usual wall. The top of the wall and the beam supported by the pillars in front. of the veranda must now be carefully leveled again. A morticed cross beam, “atravesano del tapanco” (uanddekua), is generally placed in the middle of the room at the top of the walls. The ceiling is laid directly over the tops of the walls, and wooden pins attach the two outer planks to the walls. As the ceiling serves as the floor of the attic, the planks are usually of the same thickness as the lower floor. In one corner, almost always over the veranda, but occasionally inside the room, an opening is left to provide access to the loft or attic. Upon the ‘‘planchas”’ is erected the frame of the roof. First are placed the ‘“tijeras’” (jaudrakua) consisting of pairs of fir poles about 115 varas apart. Half of the upper end of each pole is cut away, and the two are nailed together or, more com- monly in Chern, they are fastened with a wooden pin. The lower ends rest in sockets cut in the “nlanchas.’’ Two pairs of rafters are now leaned toward each other and fastened together. Usually, three groups of rafters of four each are used. At each end of the house another rafter is now placed with a deep notch in the upper end. Within this notch is fitted a ridge pole (fig. 7, d, e). For further strength, pairs of rafters may be braced by crosspieces nailed to them below the apex of the roof. In other towns the ridge pole is not used (pl. 5, lower, left). Additional smaller rafters may also be added after the main framework is erected, but in Cherdn the house normally has 14 rafters of equal size, 3 groups of 4 and 1 at each end supporting a ridge pole. Stringers, ‘‘fajillas” or ‘‘costillas” (litasa), are fastened horizontally to the rafters. The distance apart depends upon the length of shakes used. Nails are ordinarily employed now to fasten the stringers, but wooden pegs (tartju) of pine heart- wood or wild crabapple, or string of maguey or bark fibers, may be used. The method of attach- ment is such that each shed of the roof is a sepa- rate unit and, by removing the wooden pins, may be lifted off intact in case it is desired to move the house to another location (pl. 5, upper, right). The stringers are crudely made with ax or saw. They are not measured, but after fastening, any surplus length is cut off. The shakes are laid in two layers with the thick sides facing in opposite directions (fig. 8). They os er Ficure 8.—Methods of attaching and laying shakes. are fastened down now usually with 2- or 3-inch nails. However, they may also be fastened with small pins (pirén¢A) of red-pine wood, or, prefer- ably, of wild crab apple, tejocote. If pins are employed, a hole is made with an awl. The shakes must be put on while green; otherwise splitting is excessive. If it is necessary to use old shakes, they are first soaked in water. In addition to the above methods, shakes may be held in place by long thin strips of wood placed on top of the shakes. Stones are placed on the wooden strips at intervals. This method is rarely used now on houses, where the steep pitch of the roofs makes it rather insecure, but it is common on the roofs of sheds and stables and is not infre- 14 INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. 1 quent on the roofs of kitchens. If the much inferior pine shake is used, the nails usually are not driven all the way in and a length of wire is run from one nail to another, a turn being given about each nail (fig. 8, c). This may be done with fir shakes also, in which case the nails are driven all the way in after wiring. The door is usually carefully made and is bought from a master carpenter. The hinges and latch are usually of metal, although the hard- ware may be crude. If a well-made door cannot be afforded, however, the door may consist merely of loose upright planks fitting in grooves at top and bottom. A hinged trapdoor is placed in the opening to the loft. This is usually a well-built door bought from a carpenter and fastened by a stout pad- lock. A ladder gives access to the door. Some- times the ladder is a notched log (kékua). Thirty days is considered the minimum con- struction time for a house. Some further general comments on houses, or “trojes,”’ may be made. Houses with carved ornament are called ‘‘trojes labradas.”’ The parts decorated may include the beam over the front pillars, the piece over the door, capitals, the upper part of the pillars, and ‘‘cornices,” or special pieces along the upper walls. = oe eee ea eee oe Sees ard Masons 20 ooe ae ete ee ee ee 5 Brick and tile makers____________.____--------- 2 The above represents a fairly accurate census of those men in Cheréin who have special skills and who would be hired for work in their field by others if possible. To put it another way, the average man would recognize that one of these specialists would do a more competent and finished job than he could do himself; consequently, any ordinary man would make some sacrifices to employ these HOUSES OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS—BEALS, CARRASCO, McCORKLE specialists. The situation in other Sierra towns is similar. In the Lake region as well, nearly every one can make adobes and erect a house of sorts, but good work requires a specialist. In the Sierra, a master carpenter is usually em- ployed on a contract basis. employs a helper. 21 Often the carpenter In addition to their pay, the carpenter and helper are given their food. or stone structures are also built under contract, but in this case the workmen are not fed. PRELIMINARY NOTES ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF TYPES No complete survey of construction types has yet been made but some general data are available. It is clear that many fundamental features of the architecture extend through not only large areas of the Tarascan country but also into adjoining regions settled by Mestizos. The type of masonry construction with tile or shake roofs and wide over- hanging eaves extends far beyond the limits of Tarascan settlement, and the wide eaves are characteristic of even such a town as Morelia, the State capitol. In general, the higher, more heavily forested areas from at least as far west as Tin- giiindin to near Morelia show a predominance of wooden construction, usually with shake roofs. The lower and, in some instances, drier regions show a predominance of masonry-adobe structures with tile roofs and wide eaves. In some cases, shakes replace tile as roofing material. Distribu- tion of the wide-eaved masonry-adobe style ex- tends beyond the present Tarascan boundaries. It ends sharply west of Zamora, and it disappears east of Morelia. The following tabulation shows the present known distribution of types within Tarascan boundaries: Mostly wood Mostly masonry-adobe All masonrji-adobe Ahuiran Cuanajo Cucuchucho Angahuan La Cafada (all Huecorio Arantepakua towns) Thuatzio Aranza Puacuaro 2 Janicho Capacuaro Tarecuato Jardcuaro 2 Charapan Uruapan !? Naranja Cheran Zacdpu ! Pareo Cocucho Zamora ! Patzcuaro } Corupo Quiroga Nahuatzen Santa Fé Nurié Tarejero Paracho Tecuena Parangaricutiro Parjecutin Patamban Pomacuardn Tirindaro Tzentzénhuaro Tzurumiutaro Yunudn Adobe Quinseo San Felipe San Lorenzo Sevina Tucutacato Tingiindin Urapicho Zirosto 1 Indicates Mestizo town showing influence of styles. 2? Indicates shake roofs common, HOUSE FURNISHINGS ’ The terms “house,” or “‘troje,”’ and ‘‘cocina”’ as employed in the Sierra refer to the construction of the house rather than to its use. Normally, each family has a house and a kitchen. In the kitchen, the family cooks, eats, and sleeps. The house serves as a storage place for all types of property. In it also is kept the image of the family saint. Sometimes in place of a ‘“‘troje,” a “cocina de torito” is floored and used for storage. Despite this shift in use, the structure is still called a ‘“‘cocina,” or kitchen. The “‘troje”’ contains a minimum of furnishings. The loft is used purely for crop storage and usually has no furnishings whatever. The lower floor generally has a table against the wall opposite the door upon which is placed the image of a saint, if the family owns or is carring for one. If not, a picture of a saint will be found behind the table on the wall. Usually, a variety of religious pictures are tacked or pasted behind or around the picture or image of the saint. Often candles and a pottery incense burner are on the table; in addition, the table may have a varying number of miscellaneous objects placed there temporarily for safekeeping. The ceiling, especially over the altar table, may be decorated in colored tissue paper and strings of miniature household objects. Several wooden chairs with arms are kept in the 22 room, the number depending upon the economic status of the family. They are rarely used except to seat visitors. Tin trunks or wooden chests are usually found for storage of clothing. Clothing may also be hung on a pole extending from front to back wall. A sewing machine is a fairly com- mon item of equipment. Rather rarely, the room will contain a wooden bedstead; this again is used ee a Ficure 15.—Fire hearth of stones. for comal. a, Space for pots; b, space only for guests, when mats are spread over the bed. In emergencies, the room may also be used for the storage of harvests. A portion of the veranda may also be boarded for this purpose. The second floor is customarily used to store maize on the cob. BRoom BRoom POT BRUSH TORTILLA “BASKET ee INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. ya ‘ A Mate 1 The kitchen always has a hearth on the ground, usually made with six stones (pardngua), arranged as in figure 15. Infrequently, the hearth or stove is of clay (fig. 16). Space is provided for three fire places, one (fig. 15, 6) for the comal or tortilla baking dish, and two (a-a) for cooking pots. This hearth is usually at one side of the structure. Near the fire a branched stick (¢uringu) is set in the ground; on this stick pitch-pine splinters (k‘uerému) are burned for light at night. At the back of the kitchen are one or two shelves, “tinajera,” (plitu jatékua). On the upper are the old ollas and large vessels. On the bottom are new ollas (pure¢i), plates (plitu), jars (i¢ama- tarakua), wooden spoons (iodésa), and knives (kué6). Below the shelves on the ground, are the three-legged metates (iaudri), molcajetes (jitim- atakua), comales (eréksa), and large water jugs (k‘amtikua), including one set on a fiber ring (uan¢ari) containing drinking water. Also on the ground are baskets (¢akidta), tortilla baskets (“tascal,”’ kuatésa), and gourds (uaéni). Either on the floor or on the shelf may be wooden bowls (batieéa), other types of baskets (¢akidta kanimu and Stindi, ‘“chwndi’’), and fire fans (p‘unitatara- kua). All the manufactured articles are imported. The metate, when in use, is placed on a plank beside the fire. At night, it is removed and mats TORTILLA COOKER Ficure 16.—Utensils and iat commonly found in a Cheran kitchen. HOUSES OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS—BEALS, CARRASCO, McCORKLE water jvg9s | | olla wooden spoon jicara jar bow! i metate Ficure 17.—Utensils commonly found in a Cheran kitchen. 596082—44——3 24 INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. 1 are spread out for sleeping. The women sit on the ground in kneeling position; the men either sit on their heels or on low wooden benches (buritu) or low chairs (uaSdn¢akua). In Pari- cutin, Ihuatzio, and some other towns, the benches are carved in zoomorphic forms. Hang- ing from the roof may be a shingle or small board on which to place small objects (sirsu, zarzo). One or more wooden hooks (titipatara- kua) may hang from the ceiling. These and other items are illustrated in figures 16 and 17. Usually outside the house there is one or more wooden troughs used for water storage (fig. 18). In the Lake region, the furniture is similar, but the clear-cut distinction in the use of structures is lacking. Often one room serves all purposes. If a separate kitchen exists, it may be just a lean- to against a wall of the house, open, or with adobe walls. The use of the raised fireplace, ECONOMICS OF THE THE LOT Lot prices vary considerably in Cherin. At the present time, the tendency is to sell lots by front footage in the central area, but square meters (39.3 in.2) are sometimes used as a base for prices also. In the case of lower-priced lots, probably the price is not set in terms of any specific area or frontage, but is the subject of discussion and’ ultimate agreement. In general, lots (without buildings) which front on the main street were valued in 1940 at 25 pesos a meter (39.3 in.). On the outskirts of the town prices were about 10 to 12 pesos a meter (39.3 in.). WQODEN HOUSES COST OF MATERIALS The following tabulation presents the cost of those materials which ordinarily are purchased according to various estimates. Variations in price are partly due to differences in size and quality, partly to the bargaining skill of the buyer, partly to the need of the vender to sell. Pine planks, per doz., f. 0. b.2} Seven-vara (6.44-m.) planks 15 inches wide, 3 inches thick, dozen_____._____-_-___- 6. 60 Range of other estimates______--------- 7. 00-9. 00 Delivery charge, heavy planks, per dozen_ 7. 00 Price in pesos 1 Price is about the same for 1-inch planks, which are shorter and must be sawed, and long 3-inch plauks, which are adzed. Ficure 18.—Hollowed log with wooden cover used for storage of water outdoors. “chimenea,”’ is More common, and there often is also a special fireplace for the comal, a circular ridge of clay with an opening on one side to feed the fire similar to that shown for Chergén in figure 16. TARASCAN HOUSE Price in pesos Heavy square beams, each, f. 0. b--_--------- 1. 50-2. 50 Delivery ‘charge; each--2.---=2-22--2-2.4- 1. 50 Veranda pillars; each; f. 0.,.b_222- 2222 seeees 1, 25-2. 00 Delivery charge, -each=---2 22>) 2 ae 1, 25-1. 50 Shakes; bundle of 4002. 22.2.4. === 5. 00 Rafter poles; dozene 222-4. fae a ee 4. 00 Root stringers,;dozen= = 2= 22 52-2 se ese ee PH fait) rap door 2s. ase Seceec aoe ones eee eee 1. 50-3. 00 WOOPs cas a-ta2 ees ae ee ee 2. 00-8. 00 Foundation stones, delivered average (2. 50 CAC) its 2 Sect n Se ee ee 9. 00-22. 50 Nails; periolo: 22. -2.5--s.cseccseesaeeeeon 1. 60 Planks at Paracho were more costly in January 1942. Boards, six varas long, cost 0.75 to 1.25 pesos each, depending on width. Heavy planks cost according to length: Length in varas: Price in pesos By a Si ae ee 1. 50 GS a Ae eee eet ee arenes 1, 75 Wis ais atts Se ee ee eee aed 2. 00 SE ae oe fe ae ee es Fo Baye 2. 50 Oye aeawn 25 as SRO es eee are ee re ene 3. 00 Shakes, 5 cuartas (40 in.) in length; cost, 6 pesos per bundle of 400 (irépeta). COST OF CONSTRUCTION Table 3 represents the most accurate account secured of the materials, labor, and costs of a wooden house, or “troje.”’ This house was built — in July 1940 at Morelos 31. Its outside dimen- sions were 16 by 14 feet (6 by 5.2 varas), and it was raised off the ground about 18 inches (46 em.) HOUSES OF THE SIERRA TARASCANS—BEALS, CARRASCO, McCORKLE 25 on nine large stones of hard gray rock brought from the barranca north of town. The porch was not floored. Other materials used were pine beams and planks, fir shingles, and nails. Doors were purchased ready-made. TaBLE 3.—Materials, labor, and cost of constructing a wooden house, or “‘troje,” at Morelos 31 in June 1940 | Labor Cost in pesos House parts Materials used P i. : | ne n escrip- | ate- days tion | Labor | ‘vials Foundation__| 9 big stones !___...-.---- 14| Oxteamand |? (2.50)} 2. 50 driver to haul. Foundation | 5 beams, 10X10in.X16 |._---|_----- ve|Sccases 2.50 frame. ft. (0.25X0.25X4.9m.). Roof base....} 4 beams, 8X8in. X18 ft. |_...-|-.------------|------- 2.00 (0.20X0.20 5.5 m.). Floor__._.---.| 20 planks, 8X3in. X16 ft. 10. 00 (0.20 0.067 X4.9m.). Walls: .22.-.- 44 planks, 103 in, x16 15) Straighten- {322.50 20. 00 ft. (0.250.067 X4.9m.). ing planks. Ceiling-....-- 24 planks, 8X3 in. X18 ft. 12.00 (0.200.067 5.5m.). WOOL. ...-:--- Aa oor (ol 2 One 5 ees eee Od PS Re ee eer ee 8. 00 Trap door.___| 1 wooden_-_.__-_--- Sa [epee eee ened Vetoes 3.00 Porch-roof | 4 pillars, 9X9 in. x8 ft. |...--]--------------]------- 8.00 supports. (0.226 X0.226 2.45m.). IBMOlES se eee oats 1) 18 stringers, 4-16 ft. long_ |2,400 shakes, (6 irépitas) - 1 Presumably quarried by builder. ? Included under cost of materials. 3 At rate of 3 pesos per dozen. See rocks for foundation. As in all other cases, informants did not include the cost of nails for fastening the roof shakes, the only place nails are employed. In this case, the builder made some of the planks, charging the value of his product into the estimates above. However, no costs were included for haulage, except possibly in the case of the pillars. If this was the case, the pillars were secured rather cheaply. We may, therefore, add the following items omitted in the above statement: Additional costs: Price in pesos Nails, 3 kilos (probably a little generous) - ___- 3. 00 Hauling beams and planks_______---------- 60. 00 Wiesta for Woot aisings-— = 2222 2-3 ase ee 223 i al waa anrwne ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES (All plates at end of book) Cheran landscapes and methods of carrying objects. Women, carrying methods, and hair grooming. Cheran aqueducts, board sawing, shake splitting, and wheat winnowing- Cheran plaza during fiesta. Market and bull fighting during festival. Plowing, ditches to protect fields, log hewing, and Castillo, pastorela, negrito dancers, and wedding. Roofing fiesta and wedding. Specimens of maize ears. FIGURES . Woodworking implements _. meburpentine Still's. -.2....-:-.:.--<--.-sasseeecscs The Cheran plow. __- octate tar aes Pear picker .......-.-- . Tilemaker’s eens) . eee Ie . Spinning wheel and associated eoplerdea se: PAGE 16 18 22 28 34 36 Bm wd ee Sprdn-(2 ai (010) 01 eae Ane Ea a ears Ce Rien Ee RP ae Perera AVVLOMeN S:.GRCSS 225s ne ee Riathoeee ees ere A ee ee . Rope-twisting eeice ae nc nen re ce —_ 7 Market at s\@hilchotas..3:%2-- 2.2.0 se5. eee . Cheran kinship ______- pea ees EI pa@herany kimShipyssss-2 22 coos tee ee ese eeeae ae S OWerate KIS Dp meee eee eee eee . Cheran kinship Bo SAP EO Me Dee . Negrito dance figure . Dance of the Europeos....------ . A Cheran wedding. ...____... ; Py oe ae ee . Characteristics of Cheran maize ......_._____. MAPS . Modern Tarascan territory_- earn : . Cheran lands _... -----------_. ee Rae . The municipio of Cheran . The town of Cheran, house pened and BDCCIAU SES taees = cea nena a see eee seaeeene anes The town of Cheran (street map)-_--------------- 10 FOREWORD By Jutian H. Srewarp The Institute of Social Anthropology was created within the Smithsonian Institution to carry out cooperative research and teaching in the field of social anthropology as part of the broad program of Cultural and Scientific Co- operation under the State Department’s Inter- departmental Committee. One of the most important cooperative pro- grams of the Institute of Social Anthropology is with the Escuela Nacional de Antropologia del Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia of Mexico. The field research of this program will be directed toward a study of the Tarascans of Michoacan, a large group of Indians whose culture is of great interest to science and whose role in national life is of great importance to contemporary Mexico. In undertaking this work, it is the good fortune of the Institute of Social Anthropology to help further a program already extensively carried out by the University of California in coopera- tion with the Departamento de Antropologia de la Escuela de Ciencias Biolégicas del Insti- tuto Politécnico Nacional, now the Escuela Nacional de Antropologia del Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, and the Departa- mento Auténomo de Asuntos Indigenas. The present monograph is a community study of Cheran, a Tarascan village, made by Dr. Beals in collaboration with the Mexican institutions. This study is a basic document for under- standing native American communities from the point of view both of their individuality and of their gradual assimilation to national life through economic and ideological accultura- tion. Although Cheran, like many other towns of the Tarascan area, is thought of and thinks of itself as Indian, it is difficult to identify any- thing that is aboriginal besides its language and racial type. Cheran’s domesticated animals, many of its crops, its patterns of cultivation, 596569—46——_2 and its general technologies and material cul- ture are almost exclusively European. It is presumably European in its individual land ownership and inheritance, though the assump- tion that aboriginal America had collective land ownership needs further proof. Wholly Euro- pean is its cash system, involving even a monetary standard of values, loans made for interest, and the purchase from elsewhere of most goods other than the local agricultural and forest products. It might be expected that these European economic patterns would have repercussions in other aspects of the culture; actually, the degree of Hispanicization of reli- gious and social life is astonishing. Religion is strictly Catholic, witchcraft is European in type, and even the curers with their herbs and applications betray virtually nothing that is clearly aboriginal. Cherdn’s large, compact community of 5,000 persons is seemingly in the Spanish rather than Indian settlement pattern (a problem to be solved by archeology), and it may have been facilitated partly by the use of pack animals for transportation. The social configurations are likewise Spanish: the family, with a large circle of relatives by blood and marriage; the innumerable godparents; the mayordomias (festivals for the saints); the elaborate wedding ceremonies; and the dances, music, games, and other recreations. With virtually all aspects of Cheran culture that can be formally categorized clearly Spanish in origin, why is Cheran considered Indian? Cheran’s strong attachment to the locality, to the local group, and to traditional culture characterizes many other “Indian” communities in Mexico, Central America, and the Andes. The essential characteristic of an “Indian” would seem to be his failure to integrate emo- tionally and actively with national life rather than a demonstrable aboriginal content in his culture. The culture that he preserves in com- Lod parative isolation may, in fact, be far more that of 16th-century Spain than that of native America. This is not to say, however, that a pure 16th-century Spanish culture survives any- where. In the case of Cheran, Beals suggests that the distinctive characteristics may repre- sent the “pattern influence of native ideas’ on European features, together with the effects of Bishop Vasco de Quiroga’s application of Thomas More’s “Utopia.” For historical an- thropology, these communities clearly pose im- portant problems concerning 16th-century Spanish culture, its imposition through the con- quistadors and priests on the Indians, and the subsequent long interval during which many areas stabilized their culture in comparative isolation. Despite being considered Indian, Cheran seems to contain the potentialities for rapid acculturation. Its essential economic patterns will, so far as local productivity through agri- culture or manufactures permit, facilitate fur- ther economic development as the new highway stimulates increased commerce with other areas. Its essentially Spanish social patterns and its present proletariat consciousness and political sense seem to afford a ready basis for further assimilation of national culture through the informal means of outside contacts and the more formal means of governmental programs. Its strong Catholic background will pave the way for further Church influence. One cannot predict the future of such a community in detail, for it will depend partly upon national and even international developments as well as upon Cherdn’s reaction to them. General trends are now observable among comparable communities; and the work that the Institute of Social Anthropology is now carrying on in cooperation with the Escuela Nacional de An- tropologia of Mexico among other Tarascan villages that have slightly different character- istics and degrees of acculturation and the Institute’s studies in other parts of Latin America will yield data that will both clarify general trends and high-light local peculiarities. PHONETIC NOTE The phonetic symbols used conform to the Tarascan alphabet approved by the Congreso de Filélogos y Lingiiistas of Mexico in 1939 and employed by the Tarascan Project of the Departamento de Asuntos Indigenas. The alphabet is based on standard Spanish usage insofar as possible, with additional symbols added for Tarascan and with some clarification of the Spanish symbols as indicated below. The vowels a, e, 7, 0, uw have Spanish values. Spanish 7 and wu. The vowel A is intermediate between The consonants b, d, f, g, j, k, 1, m, n, p, , s, and t have regular Spanish values. In addition the following symbols are used: ¢ is the equivalent of English or Spanish ts. é is the equivalent of English ch, 7 is used for the sound of English ng in bes sing.” w is intermediate between Spanish / and . r is the equivalent of Spanish rr. s is the equivalent of English sh. ¢‘, &, k‘, p‘, and t‘ are aspirated forms of the consonants given above. f, l, and r occur only in foreign loan words in Tarascan; b, d, and g occur primarily in words of Spanish origin but occur sometimes in purely Tarascan words. Cheran: A Sierra Tarascan Village By Ratru L. Beats INTRODUCTION The study of Cheran was carried out in 1940-41 as part of the Program of Anthro- pological Investigations among the Tarascans, a cooperative undertaking of the University of California, the Escuela Nacional de Antropologia del Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e His- toria (formerly the Departamento de Antropo- logia de la Escuela de Ciencias Biologicas del In- stituto Politéenico Nacional), and the Departa- mento Auténomo de Asuntos Indigenas. In general, the program aims at a thorough in- vestigation of the Tarascans and their culture, both past and present.!’ An extensive program of this character is obviously the work of many persons and involves many individual projects. Consequently, a number of subjects which might have formed a part of the study of Cheran were not undertaken because they will be dealt with in other studies. The chief omis- sion has been the lack of any general considera- tion of the Tarascans as a whole or any investi- gation of historical backgrounds. In some respects the study of Cheran would be more rounded and intelligible had fuller knowledge of the historical changes in Tarascan culture been available. Unfortunately, the historical aspects of the Tarascan program are still little developed. Several years of documentary research would have been necessary to approach the study of Cheran with reasonably full background knowl- edge. Consequently, the description of Cheran is primarily a cross section of the culture of the community at the time of the study without any effort to interpret its historical develop- ment. 1For a fuller discussion of the Program, see Rubin de la Borbolla, D. F., and Beals, Ralph L. (1940) and Beals, Carrasco, and McCorkle (1944). Financial support for the field work came from two sources. The Board of Research of the University of California contributed ma- terially to field expenses and to the preparation of the manuscript. In addition, a substantial amount was made available for field expenses by the Departamento Auténomo de Asuntos Indigenas in México. Funds for a preliminary survey of the Tarascan area, which resulted in the selection of Cheran for study, were sup- plied by the Board of Research of the Univer- sity of California and the Instituto Politécnico Nacional. The village of Cheran was chosen for several reasons. In the first place, it is the largest of the mountain Tarascan villages and conse- quently offered an advantageous opportunity for several people to work simultaneously. Until about 1937 Cheran was also one of the most isolated of the mountain Tarascan towns. In that year the grade for the branch highway from the Guadalajara—Mexico City highway to Uruapan was established. Paving of this high- way was completed in 1940, but little effect on Cheran had yet taken place. This situation offered an attractive opportunity for later in- vestigation of the results of lessened isolation. Finally, Cheran is an almost wholly Indian town, a situation which is not true of most of the large mountain Tarascan settlements. Actually, in 1940 only a few families in Cheran did not regard themselves as Tarascan. The non-Tarascan families were more or less tran- sient and occupied a low position in the social scale; most of them were the flotsam left from the highway construction crews and _ had neither influence nor status in the town. The majority actually left the town during 1940. 1 2 INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. 2 The exceptions were two storekeepers, both from essentially Indian towns themselves, two school teachers, a Federal tax collector, and the town Secretary. The field work in Cheran was a cooperative enterprise, involving the work of numerous assistants. Most important of these helpers was Thomas McCorkle, of Berkeley, Calif. His greatest contribution was in accumulating the endless amount of detail necessary to the economic study, although there is scarcely a section of the paper which does not make use of data collected by him. Dr. Emmanuel Palacios, of the Departamento Auténomo de Asuntos Indigenas, is responsible for a great deal of the data on childbirth, infant care, midwifery, and medical practice in general. Sra. Silvia Rend6én, of the Escuela Nacional de Antropologia, worked particularly in the field of foods, but also contributed extensively on other topics, especially on matters dealing with women. She also supplied data from other towns, especially Angahuan, Capacuaro, and Chilchota. Sr. Pedro Carrasco R., of the Escuela Nacional de Antropologia, worked pri- marily on housing. His major contributions are included in two other papers (Beals, Car- rasco, and McCorkle, 1944; Beals and Carrasco, 1944), but he also provided miscellaneous notes from Cheran, Angahuan, Capacuaro, and Chilchota and some of the Lake Patzcuaro towns. Some comparative notes from Patam- ban were collected by Ricardo Pozas, of the Escuela Nacional de Antropologia, in the course of a study of pottery manufacture, the details of which are not included in this paper. Finally, some data were collected by Dorothy Beals and Margery McCorkle. In addition to the foregoing, many persons in Cheran were of assistance. Throughout the entire period of the study two were especially helpful, Agustin Rangel and Pedro Chavez. The former, although a full-blooded Tarascan, had been born and educated in California. As a literate assistant he was extremely useful in many ways; for example, in searching the town archives and recording many important facts therefrom. Perhaps his most important ser- vice, however, was in providing an entreé into the homes of his almost innumerable relatives. Particularly to be mentioned are his parents, his aunt, Dona Feliciana Bautista, and his uncle, Don Antonio Sanchez. Agustin also afforded fascinating data himself, as we were able to observe closely the process of his assimilation into the culture and life of the community. In the course of the study, he changed from a not untypical United States high school graduate into a pretty typical resident of Cheran. A particular debt of gratitude is also due Pedro Chavez. 60 (ce). 10: fiestas: in 1 year.a. oe 2. as se eae 100 Comment: The musicians obviously do not make a living from music. All have other sources of income; some are farmers, storekeepers, barbers, etc. Painters, plasterers: Daily wage ....... $1.75-2.50 Comment: Painters and plasterers have only occa- sional demands for their skills. Only a few stone or adobe houses are plastered, and fewer still are painted. Most jobs are by contract. Billiard parlors: Equipment $1,500-$1,700 Rent (monthly) 10-20 Charge per game _ .05 Comment: No estimate of the amount of business was received. It is evident, though, that the enterprise is profitable, to judge by dress and other characteristics of the owners. Butchers: Prices paid for beeves on hoof........ $80-$150 Prices reported paid at wholesale for beef weighing: 15 arrobas (875 pounds)..... ... $90 14 arrobas (850 pounds)......... 65 16 arrobas (400 pounds) ........ 92 Retail price (per kilo)................. -70 Gross profit on beef (per kilo)............ -40-.45 Price of ‘pigs..-o22525252 +4 30.00 and up Gross profit, per week...... Slee cottage chee ae 7.00-8.00 Gross profit, per pig................. 3.50-8.00 Comment: Returns to butchers are slight on the basis of meat sales. Generally the profit consists of: (a) Meat for the family at no cost, and (b) sale of the hide, usually for $10.00. Most butchers handle beef only, but one who specializes on pork, butchering one or two a week, claimed a profit of 7 or 8 pesos. An item unaccounted for in the figures for beef is a tax of $5.00 on each animal killed. It is also widely believed that some butchers deal in stolen cattle at a consider- able profit. Few butchers lack other sources of income, however, which argues against great profits. Butcher- ing also varies in profitableness at various seasons; when cheese is abundant the demand for meat falls off, and the butcher may have to dry part of his meat and sell it at a lower price. Field watchers: Wages: In maize .. 1 row in 30 Average income for 6 weeks to 2 months (cash WANE (OL INAIZE) ay «eye's clei ieee $60—-$65 Comment: Field watchers (veladores) must be men of good reputation. Usually they watch 20 to 25 pieces of land. Although wages seem high—$1 a day. or more—the work is seasonal and involves staying day and night in the fields. Water carrying: Charge for two 25-liter cans............... $0.06 Comment: Only one man engages in this work regularly. He works fairly steadily, but no data were secured on his income. Presumably it is as good or better than he could earn as a laborer. Beekeeping: 12 hives produced: 15 liters of honey at $0.60 $ 9.00 3-4 kilos of wax at $2.25-$2.50 6.70-10.00 Wax: 1 kilo makes 10-centavo candles WOT LIN 10.590 0, taky i asec eee 3.00— 3.25 3—4 kilos make 10-centavo candles VOU UNS costs, tacyave. eee ee Aors 9.00-13.00 Potential income from 12 hives if owner makes candles. .._.. 18.00—22.00 Comment: In all cases bees are kept as a profitable, but not extremely important, sideline to other activites. Fireworks making: Figures from the one fireworks maker in Cheran proved inconsistent upon analysis. The following facts seem reasonable. CHERAN: A SIERRA TARASCAN VILLAGE—BEALS tis Materials and prices: Per kilo INTER ALOS oc. audse. jroag oie seisne . $1.70 Olona terete es Acer vtec ee 5.00 SUSIE separ Santa fopels alee whe inane : pb 80 Der SELIN Pees criss 2 a,c eee, ene alts) Shakes, cane, etc................- Nominal (Shakes are $5 a bundle of 400, but the number used is small; 3 or 4 per dozen cohetes, for example.) Comment: Cohetes are made to order and sell at $3.00 to $4.00 per dozen. Castillos or set pieces are done on contract. Gross income from this source was at least $400 in 1940. Between times cohetes were made fairly steadily. Probably the fireworks maker’s income is above average. DISTRIBUTION The problem of distribution affects primarily those goods which are exported from Cheran and those things which are imported. Only a small fraction of the materials produced locally are sold locally; in the main each family pro- duces the local products it consumes and sells its surplus for export. The export goods of Cheran consist almost wholly of forest products and farm products. The first are usually sold on contract or are transported by the producer to market. Rail- road ties, for example, are always cut on con- tract. Charcoal is mostly sold to dealers from ‘Zacapu and is delivered to the nearest spot where it can be picked up by trucks. However, there is some small local sale, mostly for opera- tion of producer gas generators for nixtamal mills, and a little is carried on burros to such a town as Uruapan. Similarly, planks and beams are mainly sold, either to dealers who pick them up in trucks for export or locally on con- tract to someone building a house. In towns close to Uruapan, Zamora, or other centers, much of the sale of such products as charcoal, planks, and beams is direct, the maker carrying the goods to town on market day. The major exception to the marketing methods for forest products described above is tejamanil, or shakes. For the local market, the shake maker usually works on order. For the export market he usually takes his product on burros to some nearby Mestizo town. These expeditions may be combined with other trad- ing operations. Thus, shakes may be taken to Turetan via Nahuatzen, Tingambato, and Zira- cuaretiro, a full-day trip with burros from 5 a.m. to 8 or9 p.m. As Turetan is considered the source of the best bananas in the region, a return load of bananas frequently is purchased. Tejamanil may also be taken to Uruapan, Zamora, or Zacapu. Marketing of farm produce follows several patterns. Bulk crops, such as maize and wheat, are today sold mainly to dealers who come to town with trucks to carry off their purchases. Maize and wheat are sold as far away as Morelia. While large farmers may sell quan- tities directly to such dealers, the storekeepers also play a considerable part by their purchases of small quantities of corn or wheat. Most of the purchases in this case are of one or two almuds at a time when the family happens to need a few centavos. Nevertheless, some wheat is carried to the mills by the owner on burro back, and corn may be taken to one of the larger markets. Individual small-scale buyers also occasionally visit the town, mainly to pur- chase eggs, chickens, or even small pigs. To- day they arrive by bus, as a rule, and put in the day going from house to house, generally taking their purchases to Uruapan for sale. Some local vegetables and fruit are also taken for sale to Paracho or, more rarely, to Uruapan. Bread, atole, or tamales may also be carried to market by the women. The most important fruit export, pears, is often carried consider- able distances into Colima or into Guerrero. Sometimes the owner will carry his own pears, but more frequently a regular trader or viajero will buy the fruit. Other exported fruits in- clude tejecote, cherries, apples, and quinces. Another aspect of distribution, naturally, is concerned with the supplying of imported goods to the inhabitants of Cheran. Prac- tically all manufactured goods used in the village are imported. This applies not only to machine products but to household indus- tries as well, for the specialists of Cheran in no field supply all the local demand. Three principal agencies of distribution exist: First are the stores, specializing primarily in machine products; second, are the local markets, al- though for everything but foodstuffs the princi- pal occasions are when fiestas occur; third, are the arrieros or viajeros, the traveling traders of Cheran who bring back products from as far away as the Balsas Basin in Guer- 16 INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. 2 rero or even from the Pacific Ocean. Even men who are not regular traders will go on local market. Finally, it should be noted that individuals often visit markets, especially those in Paracho or during fiestas at nearby towns, and make purchases of needed goods. Espe- cially since the highway has brought bus service to the town, for important purchases a man may even go to Uruapan. It is not uncommon for well-to-do men, for example, to have gar- ments made to order by the tailors in Uruapan. It is impossible to compile from present data a complete list of the products imported into Cheran. The list extends from chile and beans to horses and sewing machines. Many articles are available only on special occasions. For example, the almost universally used type of water jar in Cheran is made only in Patamban, and is offered for sale only on the occasion of the fiesta of the patron saint in October. House- holders must anticipate their yearly needs of these fragile (but quite long-lived) articles at this time; otherwise they are forced to attend a fiesta in some other town and pick up a differ- ent plain style of jar made in Uruapan or La Canada. Nearly all goods sold in the stores are im- ported (except occasional local products such as clothing). A considerable list of these goods is given in the discussion of price (p. 88). Tarascan products imported include -fish and tules from the Lake area; hat braid of palm straw, chairs, tables, beds, and various wooden objects from Paracho; pottery from Santa Fe, Quiroga, Patamban, La Cafiada, and the “hot country,” or trerra caliente (the last is non- Tarascan) ; axes from Tingambato; knives, machetes, plow points, and jewelry from Na- huatzen; oils, garlic, spices, and vegetables from Zacapu and the Lake region; rebozos and cloth from Paracho, Nahuatzen, and elsewhere; pigs from La Cafiada; beans from the Lake region; chiles from various places; and a variety of fruits. The latter include bananas, coconuts (from non-Tarascan sources), sweet and sour lemons, oranges, guavas, mameys, plums, mangoes, watermelons, cantaloups, avocados, zapotes of all sorts, and cherimoyas. From non-Tarascan sources, but still outside the more conventional commercial channels, are to be mentioned pottery from Guanajuato (and even from Oaxaca), dried meat from tierra caliente, cattle, and horses. Machinery and tools made in industrial establishments include axes, saws, hoes, hatchets, plow points, engines (for nixtamal mills), sewing machines, flat irons, and, quite rarely, radios, phonographs, typewriters, and trucks. The functioning of the principal distributive agencies will now be examined in some detail. TRADERS A fair number of men in Cherdn who engage in trade are known as arrieros or viajeros. Whether there is any distinction between the two is uncertain. The impression received— and it is no more than an impression—is that originally the arrieros traveled to distant places outside of Tarascan territory, while the viajeros traded among the local villages. At present the two terms seem to be used as synonyms. In the town voting register a number of men are listed as arrieros. Nevertheless, so far as could be learned, none of them dedicates all his time to trade. At the same time, there were numerous other men listed as farmers or labor- ers, yet who make fairly regular trading trips. The main distinction seems to be that a man listed as an arriero ordinarily makes about three long trips a year, while other men may make only one. Some men who make fairly regular short trips are not listed as traders. For exarnple, one man who carries palm leaves regularly to the Paracho market is not included. The main season for trading is from late fall until June, that is, the dry season. The principal routes followed for long trips are to Guerrero, Coaleoman, and Colima. o Eas Se Zs a 596569-—-46—-8 In the data on male and female births, the sex of 3 children was not th 53 women past child-bearing age. iews wi interv 1 Based on remembered. TABLE 14.—Deaths by age groups in 1936, 1938, 1939, and 1940 MONTHLY DEATH RATE CHERAN: A SIERRA TARASCAN VILLAGE—BEALS Ne) on OWDONWDNOOMOH) OD aa] | 1PIOL | 2SS5e45R55 3 [moL lee 2 | — — A MDA NCO HH HOOD | of | ort |= 3 over [AR |B n 1 n 3 MO HOHOAOMAN | oS a) rr s | eest | SATOH 3 2 ee6r | 85] 8 = & SSOnMAMaATMA | & |Qo;n Qos | seer | en°CS = S861 | Se (5 | DOHSDMORAON |S : Oh | o | 9E61 as s 9E6T | MN] S ] qsnany - + a ) | qsnany | oo a z | ous st Arne ae tet ete 1 Aine [PO] a eune | oN rt a4 ~ | aung | 619 | 0 g Ae [oo cx) =) S | AVN CON | ro) = tudy | o at * ia Tudy [4 | + younyy ett 5 | yoy |e [oO AIBNIGA] Lo Meme Coal alae on ial (k=) Areniqa to /S ud a = qe i | Arsnuee |: oN 2 Ge) Arenuvp | 7 | 9 | daquiaeqg | moa oma 6 yoquiavaq, | 2N |S yoquiaaon aN Ce r-) JaquiaaoN | FA 18 QopQ [KAN ANA aA 23 JaqowOQ [PO | A qaquiaydag oT) lanl S = joquiaydag | 10] S qansny | 4 RNS] ~ snsny [RA |S g Amp | aa NN Dn = 2 Ainp [2 | a aun | Cae nN ae S aune | aa} a Avyy eel label > 3 AD [= [udy | +o aN a0 2 a udy a MOTE ee LS yoru |S | Aqwniqay | AN oa = re) 3 Aapniqga CIS) PL Qu E Aivnuvye wD cD “4 S a Aaenuey Pas jaqmavaq [| SSeaa oa: S S | doquasaq | I | S WqUaAADN | PHAR ORAHON 1g Ee | qequiaaon | NE g 0190 ; ‘ ~ cof - ea EY" qaqoyQ | TP aN | © < oe 1240990 Eee | © daquiaydag | NH = Lend nN = a | daquiajdag | en | a2 | qendny | WO cc 5 ne bi ysnsny |oO]S xg Arne a al a 2 B ca Aine aa} & aunp [> ae |. nn x cas aunp | oe | me es | a ABIN nie = SA ACW | moO] ae Si) ae uty [BAR DESI AE cae Sy baal | yous | PO |S / Arenaqay Pos ba Bs = Arenigayg | + | oF Aiwnute | oa: a Oo ao Arenuep |e | oO qaquiavaq | ON aa ON i) a= a Toquaaa(q | mo | oO yaquiaaoN | AN = 5 daquisaoN | AN | + 19q0O Qoaea ~ 2 yeqoy9Q | | * Jaquiaydag Jo om = cy 8 daquiaydag | I | 69 jensny | a4 a aS qysnany paola a cy at 2 Ang | aaa ro} 3 2 Ainge | #4 [2 S aune | A a4 a/b Q = aun [co | key [aN iz) | Avy | | 2 [dye ees eo] 6 THdy [ele qq qounyy | ar) = query | HA] © Areniqay SOSA esigr het o A Areniqaq | 62 | © Arenuey a a Go) < Avenuee | 4 | . ° * fo} ites a ‘@ © ia oa i= a o o ao} cH| He Se =) Gq ake! see a Te PUBLICATION NO. 2 AON AAS 1 ‘Ae aA “AN aa mn ar) Aaa SOS seth HNOKOCHDAMM HR AAAAMMANAAAN Steet eters “NA FOW MN HHKOONHAANHOMORHON = = oak | "N — “wD SS “N Yo Real ry hes! ont “A Ne SANS “SOMO er) —— a) _ _ a “AM nN a) TOD "CON i . a) _ AH AOORMARWMORM “Arrested SOMMONSROMAAAAA Ont HOPMAGAROANMMAOM i I I 4 = oO 4 4 4 ig nN 4 nN = nN a “s+ **(BaqIs0u0s) UgIOBsINg a * (sojsveu) ugiduiBieg “+ **(999 sIzT]O9) ugisisodaq : ** (BaqIIBIp) BaLIBIC, ec *(Zuisuey) opwo10yy erg Su RAE (Asdaida) ByorajTy cot ') @uypeas) ugzeqoury “*(BUT}TUIOA) O91UIO A. ie shan bags Saadodnes (190uBd) Ja0UB * (Bruouneud Buyywurayng) ayuBUru[ny Suaunen ee eee Se (uo1}10qB) 0210qy oe * (BIso]N9I18qN4) siso[noieqny, *(suinq) BinpswaN?) ss ***(zourn}) town y, a) | (umouyun) opwouossaq *(svjedisAia) vjodistiyy *@urjoo4s) osanj ep vuliy tier aie Epor oye feer no Ai estas 8 eee (ured) r0[oqy cyaay ove aust, quate eboronbre agers Gperehten cele ‘ (asvastp) pupatisajuy bie ccatts errant pa cia eet or asi (Axajdods) vyfafdody as meere * (Worjons48qo ]BUI}8aqUT) OPUSTUNTUTIYSHL Sees ee (Sutuostod) optuausaut Te cau miaiacbeseeintatepere (a1J00) oaro5 **(a[qnos JaBvey) OoBIpIBD "(usyyeuney2) OUST} BUINAY Devte she aae “*(snyd4q) oj1y, oa asaetronie) oorjorooys ugTysasUo—) scaheobat seta ee Waie nied, son ant 8 dir ***(sjyuaploo8) [BJUsploy “ (UBTGpTTGe) 0318 rata *(xod]jews) Bandra **(sryrqouoiq) siyInbuodg, Se ai iti Ben ca ca (BlIe[Bu) OWISTPH|eT sa os “o**(AgaquasAp) ByeqUIsiq, : “-**(spunoa) Bplay Pelee. peek ohitesciaick (art) Sure (yBnod Surdooya) Burlay soy, Betray ater gear eae ete ate etait ancl iain ++ (qaAaq) aIqaty vhs oa ae val sess (Apyrues) pngidaimwaq (Breyyydip) By109 41 (w1uowneud) vmow[ng Arenues OF6BL 6£6T SE6L 9E6I qsnony Aine aun | Arenuve | Jaquia.eq | Aine aung | ABI Tudy yore yy Arvniqay | Aine | 7 AVN Tudy yore yy | ArBsnigay, Aine | ABIY [ady yoaryy | AICNIQAT qenany Arenuty | Jaquiaoaq | qsnsny 1aqopO daquiaydag qsnany raqoyQ | 7 19q0Q daquiaydag Arenues Jaquia9a(] daquiaydag Arenaqaq | — Jequiaaon | 7 qaquiaaon | IaqulaAoN INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY tiwop Jo osnvg, OT6T PUM ‘6E6T ‘8S6T ‘986T Ut Yynop fo sasnnjQ— OT ATAVL 96 TABLE 17.—Death causes by summation groups of causes in 1936, 1938, 1939, and 1940 MONTHLY DEATH RATE ‘ CHERAN: A SIERRA TARASCAN VILLAGE—BEALS | BO. 2 18901. ° ES —————. co AS) OF6I iS 3 oe = 5 mae a) = 6861 =) & = esos. jy SE6I * —_ ——— 2 idee ' HOOHSANRSOA!S 9E61 a = oS qengny | ofA oa lO Ang oo Ie une OD OD et oO ° SS as eae apaome = aN 4 ae Peed = [udy aN + | youl [ANN oo. | Aawniqag | 4 a Noe o | Arenuty | er ie requavaq | ow ON 6 JaquUIaAON | AAA | LQopQ | AAAHAM AA [A | sequiajdag [A ARAN: -O---/S genany | oo: a nN a o | — Ang | cAQAS - - =a |o i ne ae all aune = = a | key [AN ANG: --- lO | “udy |SASAR Sap | yuuyy | A AN ON el : i Areniqay | 7 Ant stat [O Awnutp | AS AW AS =o Joquis0aq Oo Ha On =| NANG So ao wqueron [¥ARNA (So CN 2 : a a 41aqoqwO - ra a fee | daquiaydag | 7 cl a a qsnony : on ey o a =) Ss oO Ane ta) - a Gey sei [eared a a ounp [oom = few [po cr [udy Ol Oe Sg youvyy | ON +a =I] a ea a alee Arsnuse | ta oN ar a wquag | Aama > w/o! Jaq UWlaA0N foal a) fe | gaqoqpag | | oO ~ PAD OF Ne ae ied dequieydag = - - oD | qysnsny N nN o Ainge Ceti st 3) 4 pe) = : o oun te a os Sta | As | ONT 0 om = cm [m judy |aaeaa Sai our yy CO einai ia a [oO ~ Areniqgag | > om ot | oO Arsnuee a =] 0 a Bett acs epee al 5 8 ae eee 2 PT aCe Sarto er) 3 | oe oe — Eitice cicauens ae 3° 3 7 os foe 9 Fae 2 3 ae dmaitt H 3 =e Mile aes 5sea:: ao: t oie oe ee : oe lle: : a Se ee - Saa--i:ag8 se go9-3 o 1o9 5 Sa a S30 2 B.8 s Beem snsoges 0 Sage lsasewdtgnm S34 , oot ata 404 dg 0F S500 97 The data again are not entirely reliable because of a tendency not to count deceased children until urged. Almost always emotion was manifested upon recalling a specific child. Women were more commonly able to supply the names of deceased children. It is the impres- sion of the interviewers that the data presented are fairly accurate for all children baptised but that stillbirths and perhaps death before baptism were not counted.** Although most Cheran informants believed families were small through the small number of childbirths, the data indicate an average of 5.2 births per woman. No case of a childless woman was encountered in interviewing, al- though some exist in Cheran. If the failure to report stillbirths is taken into account, it is probable that Cheran women would rank fairly high in fertility. The small family size con- sequently is due to deaths rather than to lack of births. Data from the same families indi- cated only 2.7 children living at the time the data were collected, indicating nearly half of -all children born had already died. The data are summarized in table 13. Data on deaths for the years 1936, 1938, 1939, and part of 1940 are given in tables 14, 15, and 16. As might be expected, the highest death rate is in children under 1 year of age (probably higher than shown when unrecorded stillbirths are taken into account). The second highest rate is in the period from 1 to 9 years of age. For adults, the periods from 30 to 39 years and 60 to 69 years appear to be the most critical. Again, however, ages are only esti- mates and must not be considered as accurate. The table of deaths by causes (table 16) should be considered primarily of interest in showing the disease concepts prevalent in Cheran. There were no doctors in Cheran at the time these data were collected. Generally, the cause of death was provided by the relative registering the death, at the insistence of the Secretary that he had to put down something for his records to the State authorities. Epidemics of whooping cough and smallpox are clearly recorded, however. 28In taking a house census at Sevina, a neighboring town, the - interviewers called attention to the fact that a babe in arms had not been included in the household total. Said the grandfather: “That one is too new. One hardly knows yet whether it lives or dies, so we do not count it.” 98 INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY—PUBLICATION NO. 2 Possibly (although not necessarily) of more significance is the summary in table 17. This summation was prepared in the belief that the general class of cause was perhaps more accurately known; in other words, diphtheria as a cause of death very likely is an incorrect diagnosis, but very possibly a pulmonary disease was involved. Particular attention is called to category 3a, bilis. It is not at all certain that an intestinal disease is involved. Bilis is the catch-all of Cheran medicine. Whenever one is “under the weather,” he is apt to say he has bilis, and very possibly the concept is a recepta- cle for whatever beliefs of supernatural disease causation still exist in Cheran. The problem will be elaborated on in the discussion of disease and curing. Knowledge of emigration is necessary to understand the Cheran population situation. Virtually all the emigration has been to the United States; relatively few persons appear to have emigrated either to other parts of Mexico or to other Tarascan towns. Impres- sionistically, it would appear that a very con- siderable portion of the Cheran population has been in the United States. Probably very few families either have not been in the United States or do not have some fairly close relative who is or has been in this country. Too small a sample was taken for statistical data on this point to be valid, but of 28 males interviewed specifically with reference to emigration, 25 had been in the United States. Discussion of the motivations, character, and personal signifi- cance of this migration will be given later. Although many Cheran residents have emi- grated, few persons have immigrated.