7 Naty tee
f
/
&
7% J
ae 2226 pale
Library of the Museum
OF
COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY,
AT HARVARD COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, MASS.
Sounded by private subscription, in 1861.
Deposited by ALEX. AGASSIZ.
Jin Na
fia ivy:
y
x i
su i "
Bea bae een
a op
al i)
i Alin
oun
tpi
INGA
Toit nut an
eee
i ; we
Mc A) Pier
‘
i
th i
!
oi
}
}
i. .
tp)
‘
Pi]
Y i
} fait
ts. -
e hy
|
' 1 /
. i
®
4y } 4
1 y i!
LISP
LL
QUARTERLY JOURNAL
OF
MICROSCOPICAL SCIENCE:
EDITED BY
E. RAY LANKESTER, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.,
Fellow of Exeter College, Oxford, and Jodrell Professor of Zoology in University
College, London ;
WITH THE CO-OPERATION OF
W. T. THISELTON DYER, M.A., C.M.G., F.R.S.,
Assistant Director of the Royal Gardens, Kew ;
E. KLEIN, M.D., F.R.S.,
Joint-Lecturer on General Anatomy and Physiology in the Medical School of
St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London ;
H. N. MOSELEY, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.,
Linacre Professor of Human and Comparative Anatomy in the University of Oxford,
AND
ADAM SEDGWICK, M.A., F.BS.,
Fellow and Assistant-Lecturer of Trinity College, Cambridge.
VOLUME XXVII.—NeEw Sertrs.
ith Arthographic Plates and Engrabings on Wood,
LONDON:
J. & A. CHURCHILL, 11, NEW BURLINGTON STREET.
1887.
= a,
A Oe
a mt ONE LGe. )
yal
‘ TvTe!
PVapewe +
om t sh
aA a) 060m
ee HG Vi cP er ee)
it
find i |
g pia ~-
,
cet ul ee :
) its axing
+ > :
~
e’y d \
i La tend)
1 iby bree a? &
cae Ge oe,
a ein’
. of °F
rl
py
ge vrerit ’ *
} ¥ Vi ; co ie
YG at ee AE
7 i ‘ary
en ae
n
"Vee ha #
ay @
? 4
ta At Giga ET ‘a
CONTENTS.
CONTENTS: OF No: CVON.S. 7 AUGUST, 1886.
MEMOIRS :
The Anatomy of the Madreporaria: Il. By G. Herspert Fow rr,
B.A., Keble College, Oxon., Berkeley Fellow of the Owens
College, Manchester. (With Plate 1) : :
On the Formation of the Germinal Layers in Chelonia. By K.
Mirsuxuri, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology, and C. Isurkawa,
Assistant in Zoology, University of Tokyo, Japan. (With Plates
TET LV; and) V)
On the Structure and Development of the ‘peteanane Hlerients
in Myxine glutinosa, L. By J. T. Cunninenam, B.A.,
Fellow of University College, Oxford, and Superintendent of the
Scottish Marine Station. (With Plates VI and VIT)
Studies on Earthworms. No. II. By Witiiam Braxtanp Ben-
HAM, B.Sc., Demonstrator in the Zoological Laboratory of
University College, London. (With Plates VIII and IX)
On Dinophilus Gigas. By W. F. R. Wetnoy, M.A., Fellow of St.
John’s College, Cambridge; Lecturer on Invertebrate Morpho-
logy to the University. (With Plate X)
CONTENTS OF No. CVI, N.S., OCTOBER, 1886.
MEMOIRS:
The Development of the Mole (Talpa Europea). Stages E to
J. By Watrer Hearn, M.A., Resident Superintendent of the
Plymouth Laboratory of the Marine Biological Association of
the United Kingdom. (With Plates XI, XII and XIII)
On the Presence and Structure of the Pineal Eye in Lacertilia.
By W. Batpwin Spencer, B.A., Fellow of Lincoln College;
Assistant to the Linacre Pro‘essor of Human and Comparative
Anatomy in the University of Oxford. (With Plates XLV, XV,
XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX and XX)
PAGE
17
49
77
109
123
165
lv CONTENTS.
On the Life-History of Pedicellina. By Srpyey F. Harmer, B.A.,
B.Sc., Fellow of King’s College, Cambridge, and of University
College, London. (With Plates XXI and XXII) :
Dr. Dohrn’s Inquiries into the Evolution of Organs in the Chordata.
By J. T. Cunnineuam, B.A., F.R.S.E. .
REVIEW :
Patten on the Eyes of Molluses and Arthropods
CONTENTS OF No. CVII, N.S., JANUARY, 1887.
MEMOIRS :
The Anatomy of the Madreporarian Coral Fungia. By GrLBert
C. Bourne, B.A., F.L.S., New College, Oxford. (With Plates
XXIII, XXIV “al XXV) 3
On Some Points in the Development of Petuaneen aba:
By Artuur E. Suiptzy, B.A., Christ’s College, Cambridge,
Demonstrator of Comparative Anatomy in the University. (With
Plates XXVI, XXVIJ, XXVIIT and XXIX)
The Ammoniacal Decomposition of Urine. By Wm. Rosert
Smitu, M.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.Ep., Examiner in Chemistry and
Forensic Medicine, University of Aberdeen. (With Plate XXX,
figs. 1 and 2)
Notes on Echinoderm Morphology, No. x. On the Sipneea
Presence of Symbiotic Alge in Antedon rosacea. By P.
HERBERT CaRventer, D.Sc., F.R.S., F.L.S., Assistant Master
at Eton College. (With Plate XXX, fig. 3) : :
The Function of Nettlecells. By R. von Lenprenretp, Pu.D.,
F.L.S., Assistant in the Zoological Laboratory of University Col-
lege, London. (With Plate XXX, fig. 4) :
Some New Methods of Using the Aniline Dyes for akin
Bacteria. By E. Hanpury Hankin :
Illustrations of the Structure and Life-History of Phytophekoee
infestans, the Fungus causing the Potato Disease. By H.
MarsHatt Warp, M.A., F.L.S., Fellow of Christ’s College,
Cambridge, and Professor of Botany in the Forestry School, Royal
Indian College, Cooper’s Hill. (With Plates XXXI and XXXII)
On the Formation and Liberation of the Zoospores in the Sapro-
legniee. By Marcus M. Harroe, D.Sc., M.A.,, F.R.U.L.
PAGE
239
265
285
293
325
371
379
393
401
413
427
CONTENTS.
CONTENTS OF No. CVIII, N.S., MARCH, 1887.
MEMOIRS :
The Termination of Nerves in the Liver. By A. B. Macatium,
B.A., Fellow of University College, Toronto, Canada. (With
Plate XXXIII, figs. 1 to 6) :
On the Nuclei of the Striated Muscle- Fibre i in Mananis (Meno-
branchus) lateralis. By A. B. Macatuum, B.A., Fellow of
University College, Toronto, Canada. (With Plate XXXIII,
figs. A and B) : : :
The Development of the Cape Speties of Penuarae: Part III.
On the Changes from Stage a to Stage Fr. By Apam Sepewicx,
M.A., F.R.S., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. (With
Plates XXXIV, XXXV, XXXVI and XXXVII) ;
Morphological and Biological Observations on Criodrilus lacuum,
Hoffmeister. By Dr. L. Ortsy, Zoolog. Instit. University of
Budapest. (With Plate XXXVIII, figs. 1 to 8)
Studies on Earthworms. No. III. Criodrilus lacuum, Hof.
meister. By Witttam Braxtanp Benuam, B.Sc., Demonstrator
in the Zoological Laboratory of University College, London.
(With Plate XXXVIII, figs. 9 to 19) : : 5
Notes on the Chromatology of Antheacereus. By C. A.
Mac Muny, M.A., M.D. (With Plates XXXIX and XL)
On Ctenodrilus parvulus, nov. spec. By Ropert ScHarrr,
B.Sc., Po.D. (With Plate XLI) ; ,
The Relation of the Nemertea to the Wertsrata: By A. A. W.
Husrecut, Professor in Utrecht. (With Plate XLII)
InDEX
PAGE
439
461
467
551
561
573
591
605
645
The Anatomy of the Madreporaria: II.
By
G. Herbert Fowler, B.A.,
Keble College, Oxon., Berkeley Fellow of the Owens College, Manchester.
With Plate I.
In a previous paper (4), I have described the anatomy of a
solitary Imperforate coral, Flabellum; and of a branching
Perforate, Rhodopsammia. The present memoir treats of two
examples of colonial Perforate forms, Madrepora Durvillei
and M. aspera.
Maprerora Durvitier (Milne-Edw. and Haime).
Two fragments of this perforate Madreporarian were kindly
entrusted to me for study by Professor H. N. Moseley, who
had obtained them during the voyage of H.M.S. “Challenger.”
The species was founded by Milne-Edwards (1) from a part
of the M. rosea of Esper, but as his account is very incom-
plete, Mr. J. J. Quelch, of the British Museum, has furnished
the following description of the coral. I am glad to be able to
take occasion to thank him for this and many other courtesies.
A. “Corallum arborescent, spreading, and remotely ra-
mose, or occasionally sub-prostrate, and almost destitute of
branchlets on the under surface. Branches often nearly 2
em. thick, becoming very thin towards their extremity, sub-
terete, elongated, covered irregularly with crowded capillary
polyp-bearing branchlets, which generally give to the branches
a sub-cylindrical outline of about 3—5 mm. in diameter.
VOL, XXVII, PART 1,—NEW SER, A
2 G. HERBERT FOWLER.
Branchlets small and short, about 1—2 cm. in length, con-
sisting generally of a few thin and long tubiform calicles ;
towards the apical parts of the branches they become much
less elongated and often quite short. Surface slightly
porous, very distinctly costulated throughout, and marked with
fine echinulations which are very distinctly arranged on the
calicles. Calicles generally tubiform, about 15 mm. wide
and 1: cm. long, except towards the apical parts of the branches,
where they are shorter and smaller, and sometimes tubo-
nariform; a few short tubonariform calicles are generally
placed on the surface of the branches between the branchlets.
Star distinct, of six more or less lamelli-spiniform septa, two
of which, the distal and the proximal, are usually much
enlarged, and meet one another, often deep down in the fossa ;
while occasionally, as in the terminal calicles, the six septa are
subequal, and coalesce at the centre.”
«This species seems to be distinguishable from the M.
echinata (Dana) simply by the costulations of the surface,
which in the latter is smooth or finely granulated. It is
doubtful, however, whether this character will prove to be
sufficiently constant to separate the two species, when a larger
number of forms has been examined.”
Figs. 1 and 2 represent the dorsal and ventral aspects of a
fragment of a branch, and show most of the characteristics
mentioned in the above description.
In a transverse section of the corallum (fig. 3), the peri-
pheral ring of polyp cavities is cut somewhat obliquely (a a.),
owing to the inclination of branchlets and calicles to the
branch; while the more central ones, cut at a lower level and
more transversely, are approximately circular in outline (a’
a’.). They lie, roughly speaking, on three sides of the branch,
none are apparent on the fourth. The shorter radius of the
latter seems to imply that the growth in diameter of the
branch depends upon the outward growth of the polyps.
In the axis of the branch is a central cavity (c. c.), into
which project six septum-like ridges ; this probably represents
a cavity previously inhabited by the now apical polyp. The
THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 3
tops of both my specimens having been broken off, I have not
been able to prove this; nor again to investigate the method of
budding; but in M. aspera is such another central cavity with
six septa, which is continuous with that of the apical polyp.
All other polyp cavities converge towards, and, by means of
canals, eventually open into, this central cavity, but no more
definite connection is traceable. Tissues not unlike mesenteries
are sometimes visible in it, but the alcohol in which the speci-
mens were killed did not penetrate sufficiently rapidly to
preserve the central parts in good histological condition. In
some sections the six septa are not recognisable, and the axis
of the branch is occupied by a wide-meshed network of coral ;
this is probably due to reabsorption of part of the skeleton.
In transverse section are also seen concentric series of lon-
gitudinal canals (c*.) permeating the corallum; their
arrangement appears to indicate that the radial growth of the
branch is effected in the following manner. Directly beneath
the external body wall of the colony a series of longitudinal
canals runs between the cost (fig. 4, c') ; and it is probable
that, for increase in the diameter of the branch, the costz grow
outwards, and then, bulging laterally, fuse over these canals, so
as to enclose them entirely in corallum (cf. fig. 10, v.). Thus
there results a series of internal longitudinal canals, concen-
trically arranged, with radi of coral between them which
represent former cost. Not only does the appearance of such
a transverse section as fig. 3 suggest that this is the mode of
growth, but also “ dark lines of growth” (fig. 5) run radially
from each costa towards the centre, so continuously as to indi-
cate that what was a costa when the diameter of the branch
was very small, has continued to grow as such, and to be still
such, when the diameter is very much larger. New coste,
when required owing to the increased circumference of the
branch, appear to take their origin from the point of fusion of
previous costz.
More minutely, growth is effected, presumably by the
activity of calycoblast cells, through the addition to and for-
mation of crystalline ellipsoids, similar to those described
A G. HERBERT FOWLER.
by v. Koch in Stylophora (2). These ellipsoids have a distinct
sweep from one “ line of growth” to the next.
The calyces are all of approximately the same size, and
that so minute as to render investigation of the anatomy
difficult.
The septa are very irregular of occurrence; the complete
number appears to be six, but three are rarely to be seen in
one section, often none at all. They are not constant through
the whole depth of the polyp cavity, but occur as discontinuous
ridges (fig. 6, Ad.). In every polyp, however, either an axial or
abaxial septum is present, which enables the orientation of the
polyp to be effected as in the Alcyonaria. (These terms, axial
and abaxial, are used in preference to the ordinary and mis-
leading “dorsal”? and “ ventral,” and were suggested originally
by Professor Milnes Marshall, ‘Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin.,’
1883.)
There is no columella, but often the axial and abaxial septa
fuse, low down in the polyp cavity, so as to divide it into two
equal halves (fig. 3, a’), in a manner suggestive of the
“median plate” in Pocillopora and Seriatopora figured by
Professor Moseley (3).
The costz bear apparently no relation to the septa in the
well-grown colony, whatever may have been the case in the
founder-polyp. Not only is no connection traceable between
them in a transverse section of the branch, but even in a single
polyp standing off from the stem, where the number of septa
is under the most favorable conditions but six, about twenty
costz surround the calicle.
sp. Anatomy.—The whole of the corallum is covered exter-
nally by a definite body wall of ectoderm, mesoderm, and
endoderm (fig. 6, ext. b. w., fig. 4, ect. me. en.), immediately
beneath which lie, as in Rhodopsammia, external longitu-
dinal canals parallel to the long axis of the corallum (figs.
3, 4, 6, c'). These, however, are not the result of the same
anatomical relations in both cases ; in Rhodopsammia, lamellee
of mesoderm with a layer of endoderm on each side are given
off from the external body wall, and unite with the endoderm
THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 5
and mesoderm which clothe the exterior surface of the theca ;
and into the canals thus formed project the costa. In
M. Durvillei, the layer of endoderm and mesoderm which
is immediately apposed to the exterior surface of the corallum,
rises in a ridge towards the external body wall; and at the
points where these layers meet and fuse are formed the coste,
i.e. in the angle of the mesoderm ; and therefore between the
cost lie the canals. A comparison of fig. 4 with (4) fig. 17
will make clear the anatomical difference.
There is thus no trace of any structure resembling the “ peri-
pheral continuations of the mesenteries of v. Koch.”
These canals appear to open over the lip of the calyces into
the polyp cavities ; they are connected with each other trans-
versely between the spikes (echinulations) of the costz (figs.
6,7); and further, by radial canals (figs. 3, 4, c3.) they open
into the internal longitudinal canals, which I believe, as above
stated, to have, at an earlier period in the history of the branch,
occupied a position similarly external to the corallum. The
whole system which thus perforates the corallum, and allows
free current of fluid to even the most remote parts of the
colony, is lined by endoderm and mesoderm throughout, and
opens into similarly lined polyp cavities.
The general structure of the colony is, therefore, (1) an
external body wall, under which and between the cost
lies (2) a series of external longitudinal canals opening
into each other, and also through the corallum, into (3) the
internal canals, mainly longitudinal, with radial and trans-
verse connections, communicating in their turn with (4) the
celentera of the polyps. Into the last the external
longitudinal canals also open directly, through the theca. The
whole system is of course merely a complication of the primi-
tive coelenteron.
Of the polyps there are at least two distinct types, which
are full of interest as constituting the first record of marked
dimorphism among the Madreporaria. Both are Actinian in
structure.
Type A has in the highest sections twelve perfectly normal
6 G. HERBERT FOWLER.
mesenteries, and a stomatodeum which is a simple invagina-
tion of the external body wall. A little way down in the
polyp, six of the mesenteries, in every case the same six,
assume a curious modification of structure, which wil] be
described first as seen in a series of transverse sections. Fig. 8
represents the characteristic features of a polyp of this type;
the mesenteries numbered 2, 4, 6, 7,9, 11 are those which
undergo modification, and are diagrams of a series of drawings
made from the same mesentery with camera lucida at different
heights.
There appears first (fig. 8.2) an involution of the stomato-
deeum directed towards the mesentery, on the floor of which
the ectodermic cells are long, but shorter at the sides. By
fusion of the mesoderm and obliteration of the ectoderm on
each side of this involution, a small canal with a definite
lumen is found to be pinched off, and to lie enclosed in the
mesoderm lamella of the mesentery (fig. 8.4). In the neigh-
bourhood of this involution, the endodermic cells lining the
mesenterial chamber become enormously lengthened and vacuo-
lated, though the layer is still apparently only one cell deep.
Some sections lower down in the polyp (fig. 8 ), another
similar involution appears in the stomatodzum, in which the
ectodermic cells are short on the floor, but pass into deeper
ones at the sides; this similarly results in the enclosure of
what appears to be a second canal in the centre of the mesen-
tery (fig. 8.7). In the first canal, as is shown in the diagram,
the longer ectoderm cells face towards the stomatodzum ; in
the second away from it.
Further down yet, where the stomatodzeum ceases, the free
edge of the mesentery is enlarged into a perfectly normal
filament (fig. 8.9); and finally (fig. 8.11), the whole modifica-
tion disappears suddenly, the two canals meeting below; the
mesentery then presents a perfectly normal appearance, namely,
a mesoderm lamella with a layer of small endodermic cubical
cells on each side of it, and bearing the usual filament.
The compilation of these sections, which I have attempted
to express in fig. 6 M, shows that on an ordinary mesentery
THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 7
occurs a swelling due to elongation of the endoderm cells,
through which runs, in the mesoderm, a canal lined by ecto-
derm, doubled back on itself, and opening at both ends into
the stomatodzeum, with the ectoderm of which its lining is
continuous.
Of twenty-one polyps examined, seven present this modifi-
cation of six (and in all cases of the same six) mesenteries,
namely, those numbered 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, according to the
method employed in the diagram ; the other six mesenteries,
1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, and all the twelve mesenteries of the other
polyps, are perfectly normal, and show no tendency to such a
modification. Were it possible to explain the sectional appear-
ances by a contortion of the mesentery, the regularity with
which it occurs would be sufficient proof that it is a definite
modification of structure, the parallel of which has yet to be
sought in the Anthozoa.
The unmodified mesenteries in Type A, generally die out
before the plane of the opening of stomatodzeum into celen-
teron is reached, in transverse sections. If they present a fila-
ment, which is seldom the case, it is of the same character as
that figured (fig. 8.11), i.e. identical with that of a modified
mesentery ; more frequently none is present, or at most a
slight endodermal swelling on the free edge.
The mesenteries 4, 9, run very much deeper into the corallum
than the others.
Type B, of about the same diameter as A, is of the normal
Actinian structure. The twelve mesenteries are simple, and
exactly like those unmodified in Type A. Most of them die out
after a very short course, but those numbered 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11,
on the same notation as in fig. 8, present a more developed fila-
ment than the other six, and extend further down into the
corallum, and of these 4, 9, have by far the longest course, and
are the only ones that bear ova.
We have thus two distinct types of polyp, the one distin-
guished only for entire normality ; the other with a hitherto
undescribed form of mesentery. In both is observable a differ-
entiation affecting the same six mesenteries, exhibited in the
8 G. HERBERT FOWLER.
one case as a tendency to a longer course, and to the more
complete development of the filament; im the other as the
peculiar modification described above ; and in both types two
of these six have of all the longest course, and are, so far as I
have observed, the only ones that bear reproductive organs.
Neither type is confined to certain areas of the branch, but
both appear to be irregularly distributed.
Tentacles are not recognisable in my specimens, but it is
probable that in the living animal they occur as slight evagina-
tions of the chambers, and have shrunk under the action of the
alcohol in which the polyps were killed.
Muscles are obviously present on the mesoderm lamella of
the mesenteries, but owing to their minute size it is impossible
to detect how they are arranged. I see no reason to doubt
that they agree with Actinia. So far as it is possible to judge
without this clue, the septa are entoceelic.
c. Histology.—There is but little to be said under this head,
except as regards the modified mesentery, an almost transverse
section of which is represented in fig. 9. ‘The state of the
specimens did not allow of an exhaustive study of cell structure,
but those cells, the elongation of which causes the peculiar
swelling on both surfaces of the mesentery, are apparently
simply lengthened, much vacuolated, and ameceboid at their free
ends. No food particles were detected in them, or indeed in
any other part, but many zooxanthellz are embedded amongst
them. ‘These cells pass gradually into the ordinary endoderm,
and their appearance suggests strongly that their condition is
merely an exaggeration of that of the “ Flimmerstreifen”’ of
the brothers Hertwig, i.e. of the two lateral lobes of the
mesenterial filament.
In a recent paper (5) Dr. Wilson has suggested that these
lateral lobes are ectodermic in origin, circulatory in function,
and homologous with the “ectodermic bands” described by
him on the axial mesenteries of certain Alcyonaria. I may
here state that, so far as histological evidence from the adult
is valuable, it points, in all the Madreporaria that I have yet
examined, distinctly in the other direction. The central
THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 9
“ Nesseldriisenstreifen” have precisely the same microscopic
appearance as the stomatodzeal ectoderm; while the “ Flim-
merstreifen,” im the unbroken gradation by which they pass
into the endoderm, and by their characteristic staining, seem to
be much more nearly connected with that layer than with the
ectoderm, and to exhibit an intermediate condition between the
ordinary cubical or pavement cells of the endoderm and the
enormously lengthened cells of M. Durvillei. v. Heider (6),
on the same grounds, had previously come to the same con-
clusion with regard to Cerianthus.
The ova, which in my specimens were few in number, are
surrounded by a mesodermal capsule, and possess the ordinary
structure. In the one case, in which an ovum was observed
on a modified mesentery, it was borne on the neck between the
endodermic swelling and the mesenterial filament.
p. General Conclusions. — This form has four interesting
features in common with the Alcyonaria (Octactiniz) :
1. The marked tendency to an absence of polyps on one (the
ventral) side of the branch and branchlets.
2. The very definite orientation of the polyps by a stronger
development of axial and abaxial septa; and the concomitant
bilateral symmetry, the plane of bisection being at right angles
to the long axis of the branch or branchlet.
3. The differentiation of mesenteries, which, confined in the
Alcyonaria to two, is here extended to six, and more particu-
larly to two of these, though not the same two as in the other
group.
4. The distinct dimorphism.
Of the true significance of this dimorphism no certain
explanation can be gathered from this form studied merely by
itself; it can only be resolved by a comparative study of allied
species. Differentiation of function appears to be incomplete ;
both forms are reproductive, both apparently digestive. The
most that can be said is that A is, perhaps, more digestive and
less reproductive than B, for the filaments are more deve-
loped than in the latter form, and I have only once observed
an ovum on a modified mesentery. Should the modification
10 G. HERBERT FOWLER.
be digestive in function, as is probably the case, A might
certainly be termed a “‘ gastrozooid.”
But at present any explanation of the function of the struc-
ture above described, cannot be other than a mere speculation.
It cannot be regarded as a necessary result of the colonial
habit, since nothing similar occurs in the next species to be
described—M. aspera. It can hardly be connected with re-
production, as ova are of rarer occurrence in the modified than
in the unmodified polyps; and an excretory apparatus is not
required by an organism whose cells are capable of amceboid
activity, egestion as well as ingestion.
The only evidence on the point is derived from the distribu-
tion of the zooxanthelle. These are most plentiful, firstly, in
the external canals just under the body wall; and secondly,
among the elongated cells of the mesentery. Assuming, as we
may fairly do, that nutriment and aération were the determin-
ing factors of such distribution, it would seem that, in the first
case, there must be a strong current of nutritive “ chyle-
aqueous fluid” (to use a word of the older zoologists) in these
external canals, and that aération was effected by diffusion of
oxygen through the body wall from the surrounding medium ;
and in the second place, that the elongated vacuolated cells of
the mesentery were in some way assimilative, while oxygenation
of the tissues for these special digestive processes (and there-
fore secondarily and accidentally to the benefit of these
symbiotic alge), resulted from a constant stream of water
flowing through the central ectodermal canal of the
mesentery.
That such a stream does pass through this canal is extremely
probable, for the longer ectodermic cells are all morphologi-
cally on the same side of the canal; a wave of ciliary action
must therefore result in a current through the canal from one
of the apertures into the stomatodeum towards the other.
A comparison of fig. 8.7 with fig. 6 mw will explain this arrange-
ment of the cells.
It is interesting to note that in M. Durvillei, as in
Alcyonaria and Antipatharia, two mesenteries are distinguished
THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 11
from the rest by running far deeper into the corallum or
rachis. This may be a specialisation for circulatory purposes,
as has been shown by Dr. Wilson to be true for certain Alcyo-
naria, or connected with production of the generative elements,
as is the case in Antipatharia; in M. Durvillei certainly the
latter, perhaps also the former, holds good.
Maprepora AsPEeRA (Dana).
For a fragment of this coral, fortunately the upper part of a
branch, I am again indebted to Professor Moseley.
The species was founded by Dana (7), who gives a good
figure of the colony.
A. Corallum.—A transvers esection of the corallum (fig. 10)
shows that the polyp cavities (a a’) are arranged in a definite
ring, and not merely confined to three sides as in M. Durvillei,
round a central cavity into which project six septa, more or
less fused together at their free edges. This central cavity
(c. c.) is continuous with that of the apical polyp of the branch.
The arrangement of the internal longitudinal canals is not so
definitely concentric as in M. Durvillei, but the method of
circumferential growth of the corallum appears to be similar
in both species, since the costz appear to fuse over the external
longitudinal canals (v. fig. 10, z, and p. 3).
In the apical polyps are found six distinct entoccelic septa,
and six smaller exoccelic, of which all are not always present ;
in the others generally only an axial or abaxial septum. A
similar difference between them was observed by v. Koch (8)
in M. variabilis, where both exosepta and entosepta were
present in the apical polyps, but entosepta only in the rest.
In this form, as in the former species, there appears to be
no relation in number and position between cost and septa,
the former being by far the most numerous.
The cost are apparently formed as in M. Durvillei,
that is, at the points where the endoderm and mesoderm
apposed to the exterior surface of the corallum touch the
external body wall (v. p. 5 and fig. 4), but in both species,
owing to alcoholic contraction, the latter has so shrunk on to
12 G. HERBERT FOWLER.
the corallum that the cost project through it, and the exact
conditions are difficult to determine with certainty.
B. Anatomy.—The general anatomy of the colony, as regards
the relations of canals, body wall, polyp cavities, &c., agrees
with that of M. Durvillei. Beyond the fact that in M.
aspera the polyp cavities are placed closer together, and that
therefore there are fewer canals in the corallum, there is little
or no difference between them. As regards the polyps, how-
ever, there is no dimorphism; all the polyps, except those
which are obviously immature buds, are identical in structure.
A typical polyp possesses twelve perfectly normal mesen-
teries, and a stomatodeum which is a simple invagination of
the external body wall. When numbered on the same system
as in M. Durvillei, it is found that those mesenteries marked
1, 2, 4, 6,7, 9, 11, 12, are the ones which develop mesen-
terial filaments, that is, the same mesenteries as in M.
Durvillei, with the addition of the abaxial “ directives ;”
while the others, 3, 5, 8, 10, generally have no filament, and
do not extend to the bottom of the stomatodeum.
The apical polyps are about twice the size of the others,
but, except for their possession of more septa, are identical
in structure with them.
The muscles in both apical and lateral polyps are arranged
on the mesenteries just as in Actinia, and present nothing
unusual in structure.
Tentacles I was unable to recognise, macroscopically or
by sections, but a figure by Dana shows that they are present,
and twelve in number. In this, as in the species last described,
they have shrunk into insignificance, owing to the action of
the spirit in which the specimens were preserved. They agree
with M. variabilis, in which, according to v. Koch, they are
also exoccelic and entoccelic.
The histology calls for no remark, agreeing with that of
forms already described. Calycoblasts were very distinctly
present in the growing parts of the colony.
c. Method of Budding.—With regard to this, I have been
able to gléan but little information ; since the immature polyps
THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 13
are so crowded with zooxanthellz, owing presumably to the
amount of nutriment supplied to them, that the tissues are
much obscured.
The stomatodzeum is invaginated to a considerable depth
into the future polyp cavity before it is perforated for com-
munication between the ceelenteron and the exterior, and also
apparently before any mesenteries are formed. The cavity
into which it is invaginated is already of considerable diameter,
and larger than the ordinary canals of the colony; though
smaller than that of a fully formed polyp, at that point it is
probably never enlarged by reabsorption of coral, but its con-
tinuation upwards by future growth of the polyp possesses a
gradually increasing diameter.
In a young polyp in which the stomatodeum was invagi-
nated, but not yet perforated below, the latter appeared to be
supported by tissue surrounding the future septa, just as the
external body wall is supported by tissue enclosing the costz.
In sections below the stomatodzum, and unconnected with it,
were seen two small mesenteries with filaments, which appeared
to be growing upwards towards the stomatodzum, and to have
not yet joined it. It is therefore possible that these grow
upwards from the canal system, and are formed quite inde-
pendently of the rest of the polyp. This view is further
supported by the observation that, in sections quite at the top
of a branch, above the plane of any lateral polyps, occur in
the canals one, sometimes two, little mesenteries with fila-
ments, which I believe to be growing upwards towards the
sites of future polyps. They appear to take rise, near the
cavity of the apical polyp, from the wall of the canals.
In the only other stage of development from which any
observations could be made six mesenteries had appeared ; of
these the two furthest from the axis carried muscles on the
outer faces, though it does not necessarily follow that they
were the abaxial “directives” of the adult. The muscles of
the other two pairs were not sufficiently developed to allow of
their arrangement being recognised.
Conclusion—From M,. Durvillei, the present species is
14 G. HERBERT FOWLER.
widely separated by a strong morphological distinction, the
absence of dimorphism; since the difference between the
apical and lateral polyps in M. aspera is hardly strong enough
to be reckoned as such. That such a distinction should exist
between two species of a genus is very remarkable; but, con-
sidering the great antiquity of these forms, the similar struc-
ture of the colony in both, and the fact that they exhibit a
similar differentiation of certain mesenteries, it is not to be
inferred that their systematic relations are unsound.
Nore.
For microscopic sections through both hard and soft parts
of the coral, such as are figured in (4) Pl. XLI, figs. 14, 15, I
have found the method, originally applied by v. Koch to these
forms, extremely useful. The coral, having been left in borax
carmine for three days, and treated with acidulated alcohol for
six hours, is transferred to absolute alcohol, and from this to
ether; into the ether is dropped absolutely dry powdered
Canada balsam in small quantities at a time, till enough is dis-
solved to make a block, rather larger when dry than the speci-
men. The ether is driven off by a gentle heat, leaving the
coral permeated throughout by balsam. About a week should
be devoted to this part of the process.
Sections are then cut with a lapidary wheel, or, if this is not
procurable, with afret saw ; and ground like geological sections
on a slate, then polished on a water of Ayr stone. Oil and
emery powder should be avoided, water alone being used for
the stones.
One surface of the section having been ground and polished,
it should be affixed permanently by that surface to a glass
slide, on to which some dry Canada balsam has been melted,
and not again be moved. When the other surface has been
similarly ground and polished to the required thinness, it
should be brushed lightly, first with absolute alcohol, then
immediately with oil of cloves; this removes all dirt from the
surface. A drop of balsam in benzole is then placed on the
section, and the cover glass lightly dropped on it.
THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 15
ERRATUM.
In my previous paper (4) Pl. XL, fig. 1°, the septa were
wrongly numbered ; they should have been marked 1, 4, 3, 4,
2, 4, 3, 4, 1, reckoning on each side from the central “ direc-
tive’ septum, D.
LITERATURE.
1. Mitnz-Epwarps.—‘ Hist. Nat. d. Coralliaires,’ iii, p. 148.
2. von Kocu.—‘ Jen. Zeitschr.,’ Bd. xi.
3. MospetEy.—‘ Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci.,’ Oct., 1882.
4, FowLer.—‘ Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci.,’ Oct., 1885.
5. Witson.—‘ Mitth. Zool. Sta. Neap.,’ Bd. v.
6. von Herppr.—‘ Sitz. k. Akad. Wissench.,’ 1879.
7. Dana.— Zoophytes of the Wilkes Expedition.’
8. v. Kocu.—‘ Morph. Jahrb.,’ Bd. vi.
DESCRIPTION OF PLATE I,
Illustrating Mr. G. Herbert Fowler’s Paper on “ The Anatomy
of the Madreporaria.”
a. Polyp cavities, cut obliquely. a’. Polyp cavities, cut transversely. 4d.
Abaxial (ventral) septum. 4. Axial (dorsal) septum. C. Coste. c.c. Cen-
tral cavity, continuous with the apical polyp. _c!. External longitudinal canals
between the coste. c*. Internal longitudinal canals. c*. Radial and trans-
verse connecting canals. Co. Corallum of the main branch. d. Cut edges of
the endoderm and mesoderm lining the celenteron. ect. Ectoderm. ex. En-
doderm. ext. b. w. External body wall of ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm.
M. Mesentery, showing the endodermal swelling. me. Mesoderm lamella.
S. Septum. S.C. Septal Columella-plate. St. Stomatodeum. 7%. Theca
of polyp. Z. Zooxanthelle. 2. Fusion of coste over ext. long. canals.
All except Fig. 10 are from Madrepora Durvillei.
Fie. 1.—Dorsal view of the corallum of two fragments of a branch,
bearing calicles, and branchlets formed of other calicles.
Fie. 2.—Ventral view of the same specimens ; one of which is entirely
bare of calicles on this side, and on the other ouly a few are present.
Fic. 3.—Transverse section of a branch, showing the polyp cavities, the
central cavity, and the canals running in various directions. The concentric
16 G. HERBERT FOWLER.
arrangement of the latter is well shown. Into the central cavity project the
six septa. In two of the innermost ring of polyps, the axial and abaxial
septa have fused into the septal columella-plate.
Fic. 4.—Diagram of a transverse section of a polyp and of part of the
branch. The external body wall is shown to be supported on the cost, as
its mesoderm and endoderm are continuous with those lying on the outer face
of the corallum. The polyp cavity shows at this point twelve mesenteries
supporting the stomatodeum. (In nature the mesoderm lies closely apposed
to the surface of the corallum, and there is no space between them, such as is
introduced into the diagram for clearness.)
Fic. 5.—Transverse section of a portion of the branch, to show the lines
of growth, running between the canals radially and terminating each in a
costa.
Fic. 6.—Diagram of a longitudinal section of a polyp along the dotted line
in Fig. 8. The tentacles are omitted, as they were not recognisable in my
specimens ; the canal system in the corallum is also omitted. On the left the
section passes between the axial septum and mesentery No. 7, and above the
polyp down an external longitudinal canal; on the right, through the abaxial
septum and down a costa, of which the echinulations and the canals between
them are shown. The numbers indicate the same mesenteries as in Fig. 8.
On the mesentery 7 is figured the endodermal swelling, with the bent canal
indicated by dotted lines. In the stomatodum are shown the two openings
of the canals of mesenteries 7, 9, 11; and below the stomatodeum the free
edges of these three mesenteries alone appear, the others dying out before
this plane is reached. The dotted line indicates the junction of theca and
septa, and the discontinuous character of the septum (42.) is clearly shown.
Fic. 7.—The external body wall viewed from the exterior; the lighter spots
are the places where the echinulations of the costs have pierced the body
wall on account of its shrinkage. This drawing shows the arrangement of the
external longitudinal canals, and their connections between the spikes of the
costee. (Camera lucida.)
Fic. 8.—Diagram of the various forms and conditions of the mesenteries
in a polyp of Type A. Those numbered 1], 3, 5, 8, 10, 12 are unmodified and
normal. The others, 2, 4, 6, 7,9, 11, are modified in all the polyps of this
type; they are from camera lucida drawings of the same mesentery at different
heights. The arrows and Roman numerals in Fig. 8 show the planes in which
the successive sections are taken.—2 shows the endodermal swelling, and the
upper opening of the canal; 6 shows the lower opening; 9 is below the
stomatodeeum, and bears a filament; and in 11] no trace of the modification
remains, the mesentery being normal, and similar to those of Type B.
Fic. 9.—Transverse section of a modified mesentery, passing through both
arms of the canal.
Fic. 10.—Transverse section of the corallum of a branch of M. aspera.
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 17
On the Formation of the Germinal Layers in
Chelonia.
By
K. Mitsukuri, Ph.D.,
Professor of Zoology,
and
Cc. Ishikawa,
Assistant in Zoology, University of Tokyo, Japan.
With Plates II, III, IV, and V.
In the spring of 1884 we made the acquaintance of Mr.
Hattori, the proprietor of a large fish-hatching establishment in
Honjo, a suburb of Tokyo. His father before him, and he, had
succeeded in making the snapping turtle—Trionyx Japo-
nicus, Schlegel—breed freely and naturally in captivity, and
thus in furnishing the market with a constant and large supply
of its delicate flesh. In his farm hundreds of these turtles are
annually hatched, and if the eggs are marked as they are laid
the exact age of any given deposit can be determined with
great precision, even to minutes in many cases. Such an
opportunity for the investigation of Reptilian development
seemed to us too good to be thrown away, especially as nobody
had, so far as we were aware at the time, worked on the em-
bryology of Chelonia since the days of Agassiz and Clark, and
therefore with modern methods of investigation. Mr. Hattori
kindly consenting, we went to his farm daily during the
breeding season of 1884 and of 1885, and succeeded in collect-
ing a fairly complete series of the Tryonix embryos, beginning
VOL, XXVIJ, PART ].—NEW SER, B
18 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
with the time when the eggs are deposited, and ending with
their hatching out. The present paper gives the results of our
study on the formation of the germinal layers. Papers on
other points and later stages of development will follow from
time to time since the investigation is being continued, as the
pressure of other duties permit us.
We wish to return our warmest thanks to Mr. Hattori for
cheerfully acceding to our numerous demands on his good
nature, and for furthering greatly our work with his intelli-
gent assistance. Thanks are also due to the authorities of the
University of Tokyo for the payment of necessary expenses
attending the investigation, and for the use of instruments,
reagents, &c. Finally, we wish to express our deep obligations
to Dr. Isao Jijima for valuable suggestions in regard to the
methods of investigation.
We made many interesting observations on the breeding
habits of Trionyx, but we reserve these for some other occasion,
as foreign to the purpose of this paper. We simply mention
that the Trionyx eggs are nearly spherical in shape, and have
a hard brittle shell like that of the fowl, and not leathery, as
in some Chelonia. Their size is very variable, the smallest we
measured being 10 mm., the largest 23 mm., the most usual
size about 21—22 mm. in diameter. This difference in size
seems to be due mostly to the size of the parent. With this
we pass on at once to the consideration of the subject proper
of the present communication.
The earliest stage of which we will give a detailed description
is taken from an egg opened directly after its deposition. Our
attempts to obtain still earlier stages by opening pregnant
females have proved but partially successful. In almost every
case, with only some doubtful exceptions, the eggs we found
in the oviduct were unfortunately fully as much advanced as
those just laid.
On opening an egg directly after its deposition the blasto-
derm is always found at the pole turned above. The embryonic
shield, with the pellucid area around it, stands out conspicuously
as a small, nearly circular spot, on the yellow surface of the
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN OCHELONIA. 19
yolk. The general appearance of the embryonic shield at this
stage is represented in fig. 1 @ and 34, enlarged about thirty
diameters. Fig. 1 a, shows it as seen from the dorsal side,
and fig. 1 6, as seen from the ventral side after the removal of
the shield from the egg. The embryonic shield does not lie in
the centre of the area pellucida (a. p.), but is placed excentri-
cally nearer its hind end, so that here it is continuous with the
area opaca (a. 0.). The ectoblast has already spread itself over
a large part of the egg, although we did not determine its exact
limits (see fig. 16). On the dorsal view the blastopore (d/.,
fig. 1 a) forms the most conspicuous feature ; it is seen as a
wide transverse slit across the posterior part of the embryonic
shield, occupying considerably more than one third of the
breadth across. From the blastopore a passage leads obliquely
forward and ventralward, and opens about in the centre of the
ventral surface with a circular opening (v. 0.). The walls of
the ventral opening are posteriorly quite high, but become
gradually lower and lower toward the front, until they sink to
the general level of the ventral surface. For the sake of
brevity this passage, leading from the blastopore dorsally and
opening below, we shall hereafter call the blastoporic passage.
It becomes eventually the neurenteric canal. Returning to
the dorsal surface, the shield in front of the blastopore presents
a broad flat expanse, in which are seen indistinctly three opaque
lines radiating from behind forward, like the prongs of a
trident. On referring to the ventral side we see that the two
lateral opaque lines correspond to the thickenings which form
the walls of the inferior opening of the blastoporic passage.
Accordingly they are thickest posteriorly, and gradually thin
out toward the front. The middle prong of the trident cor-
responds to the roof of the blastoporic passage, and its con-
tinuation to the front edge of the embryonic shield. It is, in
fact, the chorda entoblast, which is still in the process of
formation in front, as will be made clear by sections. The
remaining parts of the ventral surface not taken up by these
three thickenings present the appearance of a honeycomb.
Of this we shall speak later on. Coming back to the dorsal
20 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
surface again, the area behind the blastopore, especially the
median longitudinal space, is on a lower level than the parts in
front. This, the sections show us, is the line of the primitive
streak. At the part where the embryonic shield posteriorly
joins the area opaca there is a considerable transverse thicken-
ing (s/.), shown both in the dorsal and ventral views—in the
latter covered with yolk matter. This undoubtedly corresponds
to the “sichel” or “sickle” which Kupffer describes in a
similar Lacerta embryo (No. 5, Taf. i, fig. 1, s/.). We should
add that these differences in level become much more con-
spicuous after the embryonic shield has been removed and
treated in reagents than when it is stretched over the yolk,
and also that the embryos of this stage vary considerably in
their surface views, especially when they are hardened.
Figs. 7—15 are selected from the series of transverse sec-
tions obtained from the embryo represented in figs. 1 @ and 6.
The figures are arranged in order from behind forward. Figs.
7—9 pass through the part behind the blastopore, figs. 10, 11
through the blastoporic passage, and figs. 12—15 through the
part in front of the blastopore.
In fig. 7, the most posterior section represented, the ecto-
blast extends over the whole, being two or three layers of cells
thick in the embryonic shield, but gradually thinning out to a
single layer of flat cells toward both sides. The yolk occupies
the entire lower stratum. Nuclei (n.7.) are visiblein it. The
space between the ectoblast and the yolk is occupied by a mass
of mesoblast cells which is here distinctly separate from both
the ectoblast and the yolk.
In fig. 8 (which by the way is taken from another embryo of
the same deposit, as the section corresponding to this in the
first series is unfortunately injured) the ectoblast is continuous
in the median line with the mesoblast, i. e. it is very actively
proliferating and giving off cells abundantly to the mesoblast.
Fig. 9 passes through the region directly behind the blasto-
pore. The ectoblast is distinct laterally, but toward the
median line, and at some distance from it, passes gradually into
a mass of cells in which no layers can be distinguished. Dif-
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA, 21
ferent from fig. 8 where the ectoblast cells, although con-
tinuous in the median line with the mass below, still maintain
their columnar shape over the whole dorsal surface and thus
give an impression of the ectoblast extending entirely across ;
the ectoblast is in this section fused into the median mass
without retaining the slightest trace of the columnar arrange-
ment, and the median mass of cells thus expose their surface
to the exterior for a short space in the axial line (yk. p.). We
wish to emphasise the fact that this part directly behind the
blastopore is neither at this nor at any subsequent time until
considerably later (if ever at all), covered by the ectoblast of
the general surface of the body. This area we consider to
be the remnant of the yolk-plug of Rusconi found in
the Amphibian embryos. This will become clear in the
later stages. rom the axial mass, where the layers are indis-
tinguishable, there extends toward each side a thick meso-
blastic wing under the ectoblast. The yolk seems to be dis-
tinct from the mass above, although, throughout this region,
protoplasmic threads seem to connect the two.
Fig. 10 passes just in front of the dorsal lip of the blastopore
where the ectoblast reflects downward and forward to become
continuous with the axial strip of the entoblast or chorda-
entoblast (compare fig. 16). The blastoporic passage (dl. p.)
seen as a transverse space is still open on the left to the
exterior. The floor of the passage is formed by a mass of cells
continuous with the yolk-plug ; in fact we may consider this a
part of the plug. At a lower level the mesoblast (mes.)
stretches out laterally as two wings from the median mass.
The relations of the yolk are the same as in fig. 9.
So far the sections seem to have passed through the part
known as the “ sickle.”
The next section represented (fig. 11) evidently passes
through what may be called the neck or isthmus, i.e. the point
from which the three prongs of the trident referred to in the
surface view radiate (compare fig. 1 6). Accordingly, the
entoblast is found only in the median line as a thickening con-
stituting the walls of the blastoporic passage (6/. p.), which is
22 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
now irregularly circular in section. The roof and the sides of
the passage are formed by a columnar epithelium two or three
cells thick (enc.). This is continuous with the ectoblast at the
dorsal lip of the blastopore (compare figs. 16 and 10). It is
the chorda-entoblast of Hertwig (No. 6). The floor of the
passage and the lower part in general is made up of irregularly
scattered cells. This is not only the continuation of the yolk-
plug but also of the yolk itself, which occupied the lowest
stratum in figs. 7—10. and which has been in the last two or
three sections gradually merging itself into the floor of the
blastoporic passage. Thus, although it does not appear in any
single transverse section, the three germinal layers are fused
in the region behind the blastopore. Laterally the entoblast
is very thin and passes gradually into the yolk. The section
is out of the region of the “ sickle,”’ and there is no longer a
mesoblastic wing on each side.
Fig. 12 passes through the posterior part of the lower open-
ing of the blastoporic passage. The thickenings which form
the lateral walls of the opening are therefore still quite thick
(compare fig. 1 4). The columnar chorda-entoblast is found
as before forming the roof and the sides of the passage, which
is now open below. Towards the lower part of the side walls
the columnar arrangement is lost and the cells are irregularly
scattered. Further out at the sides the cells form a loose
network, and then at the edge of the embryonic shield passes
into the yolk.
Fig. 13 passes through the anterior part of the ventral open-
ing of the blastoporic passage, which has now flattened itself
out into a shallow groove in the median line. Its roof is still
formed by the distinctly columnar chorda-entoblast. Later-
ally, the chorda-entoblast gradually passes into a mass of cells
arranged in an irregular loose network, which in its turn is
replaced by the yolk at the edge of the embryonic shield.
Passing forward, the chorda-entoblast begins gradually to con-
fine itself more and more to the ventral median surface, until in
the seventh section from fig. 13 it has the appearance, presented
in fig. 14. Here the columnar shape is confined to a few cells
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONTA. 23
in the ventral median line. They pass above gradually into the
loose network of cells which has now extended itself entirely
across. The meshes of the network have also become larger
than in the previous sections. It is evidently this loose network
that produced the appearance of a honeycomb in fig. 1 0.
Fig. 14 passes in front of the ventral opening of the blasto-
poric passage, and indicates that the loosely scattered lower
layer cells are here arranging themselves into the chorda-
entoblast in the ventral median line of this region, i.e. along
the front part of the middle prong of the trident apparent in
the surface views (figs. 1 @ and 4).
Fig. 15 passes near the front end of the embryonic shield.
There is no longer any trace of the chorda-entoblast ; the
entire entoblast is an irregular stratum of stellate cells not
thick enough to form a network. It passes into the yolk at
the sides.
We may here call attention to the appearances which are
seen in some embryos of this stage. Round the edge of the
lower opening of the blastoporic passage, especially toward the
front, there is a shelf-like extension of the entoblast into the
archenteric cavity somewhat like the velum of a hydromedusa.
Fig. 14a, Pl. III, represents such an appearance. The section
is well in front, so that the shelf-like extension is continuous
across and divides a small space above from the main digestive
cavity below. In sections posterior to this, the small space
opens below. We do not know what the significance of this is,
unless we suppose that the embryo is younger than that given
in fig. 1, and therefore the ventral opening of the blastoporic
passage is not yet entirely clear.
Fig. J6 is the median longitudinal section of an embryo
taken from the same lot as that represented in fig. 1. The
blastoporic passage is very distinct. On its dorsal lip, the
ectoblast is reflected forwards and downwards and becomes
continuous with the chorda-entoblast which passes in front into
a loose network of cells with wide meshes, and finally, into the
yolk at the edge of the embryonic shield. At the posterior
wall of the blastoporic passage, the three layers, the ectoblast,
24 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
the mesoblast, and the yolk (i.e. the entoblast) are merged
into one another; in other words, the ectoblast and the ento-
blast are here fused and from the fused place a mass of
mesoblast cells extends posteriorly. The three layers are inde-
pendent a short distance behind the blastopore. As the cross-
sections of this region (figs. 8, 9, and 10) show that the
mesoblastic mass is similarly extending to each side, we may
conclude that, in addition to the primitive streak (fig. 8), the
mesoblast is being given off from the posterior wall of the
blastoporic passage, or at least from its upper part in all
posterior directions for an arc of 180°, somewhat in the shape
of an open fan; and this posterior unpaired mesoblastic mass
causes the swelling known as the “sickle.” Examining the
ectoblast of the posterior part more in detail, we find it
gradually losing its columnar character as we approach the
blastopore from behind, but the space where the fused median
mass of cells is dorsally exposed to the exterior, viz. the yolk-
plug (compare fig. 9) is not as conspicuous in the longitudinal
section as in the later stages. The entoblastic part of this
fused mass extends quite forward. This corresponds to the
cells seen in the floor of the blastoporic passage in fig. 11. A
slight projection from its extreme tip is, we imagine, the
remnant of the shelf-like structure mentioned in reference to
fig. 14 a.
The principal facts brought out by the study of this stage
may be summed up as follows :
J. There is a passage which, beginning with the blastopore
on the posterior part of the dorsal surface, takes a forward
aud downward course to the ventral surface, opening in about
the middle part of the latter by a circular opening.
2. At the dorsal lip of the blastopore the ectoblast is re
flected and becomes continuous with the chorda-entoblast.
3. In front of the blastopore there are as yet only two
primary layers, the ectoblast and the entoblast.
4. The entoblast is having its axial part arranged into a
columnar epithelium to form the chorda-entoblast. This
process proceeds from behind forward.
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN OHELONIA. 25
5. At the posterior wall (i.e. floor) of the blastoporic pas-
sage the ectoblast and the entoblast are fused, and from the
point of fusion the mesoblast is being given off posteriorly in
all directions for the space of 180°.
6. Also, behind the place where the two primary layers are
thus fused, the ectoblast is giving off cells to the mesoblast
along the median line (fig. 8). This is the line of the primi-
tive streak. It is very short and is present in only two or
three sections.
7. The mesoblastic mass derived from the two sources men-
tioned in (5) and (6) is unpaired and constitutes the transverse
swelling in the posterior part of the embryonic shield, “the
sickle.” This is the only place where the mesoblast is present
at this stage.
8. The median mass formed by the fusion of the three
layers at the posterior wall of the blastoporic passage appears
for a short space on the dorsal surface (fig. 9)—the remnant of
the yolk-plug of Rusconi.
Formation of the Mesoblast and of the Chorda
Dorsalis.
In the previous stage, the mesoblast was found only in the
region behind the blastoporee We may now proceed to
describe its formation in front of the blastopore. We call atten-
tion first to the embryo represented in figs. 2 a and b. It was
taken out exactly forty-eight hours after the deposition, but as
the weather was unusually cold for the season during the
interval, it has made very little progress in development, and
is not as far advanced as many thirty-six hours old. As before,
a dorsal and a ventral view of the embryonic shield is given,
although these are not taken in this case from the same
embryo. The shape of the shield has not changed materially
from the previous stage. In the dorsal view (fig. 2a) the
blastopore has assumed a horseshoe shape, and is more of a
slit than before. Occupying the concavity of the horseshoe
is the rudimentary yolk-plug. Round the blastopore, and
26 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
along the median line in front of it, there is an opacity. This
seems to be due simply to the fact that the cell layers are
thicker in this region than elsewhere. In the middle of this
opacity in front of the blastopore and apparently starting from
the latter there is a shallow median groove, which probably
corresponds to the “ Primitivrinne” or “ Rickenrinne”
described by Hertwig in the Triton embryo (No. 6). On the
ventral side (fig. 24), we wish to call especial attention to the
ventral opening of the blastoporic passage (v.0.). In the
previous stage, it was acircular opening without definite limits.
In this stage it has acquired well-defined limits on all sides ex-
cept towards the front, where it is only faintly bounded. Along
the median line of the roof of the recess thus formed, a wide
low ridge is visible and is continued in some specimens in
front of this area. This is undoubtedly the chorda-entoblast.
In the ventral view, the posterior part is concealed by
a mass of yolk which has accumulated here in the process of
removing the shield from the egy.
As we are going to describe somewhat in detail the next
stage, we may omit the description of the sections of this,
except one through the ventral opening of the blastoporic
passage. Fig. 17 is such a section. It passes through the front
part of the lower opening. There is in the median line a
slight notch in the ectoblast which corresponds to the groove
seen in the surface view. In the entcblast we see the axial
chorda-entoblast formed as usual of columnar cells. Late-
rally, it passes on each side into a mass of polygonal cells—
the darm-entoblast of Hertwig (No. 6)—which becomes in
its turn continuous with the yolk at the edge of the em-
bryonic shield. At the point where the chorda-entoblast
and the darm-entoblast meet each other, the darm-entoblast
projects as a ridge into the digestive cavity and thus con-
stitutes one of the lateral edges which bound the ventral
opening of the blastoporic passage (compare fig. 2 4). Con-
forming to the groove in the ectoblast, the chorda-entoblast
projects downwards in the median line. This corresponds no
doubt to the ridge seen in the surface view within the lower
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 27.
opening of the blastoporic passage. This section also shows
that the roof of the well-defined area which forms the lower
opening of the blastoporic passage is formed by the chorda-
entoblast and that the latter thus occupies by itself a special
recess of the digestive cavity. From just where the
chorda-entoblast and the darm-entoblast join each
other, there goes out laterally on each sidea string
of cells (mes.) placed dorsally to the darm-entoblast
and ventrally to the ectoblast and distinct from
both. This is the commencing mesoblast. The meso-
blast is therefore not continuous from the first across the
median line. .
The surface view of the next stage is represented in fig. 3.
The embryonic shield has become pear-shaped, the broader
end being the front end. The blastopore is horseshoe shaped,
as in figs. 2 a and 4, and occupying its concavity is the yolk-
plug. The head-fold has just begun, and is seen as the pos-
terior of the two semilunar curves found near the front end of
the embryonic shield. The anterior curve is probably the
commencing amniotic fold. Between the head-fold and the
blastopore there is seen in the median line an opaque streak,
which is narrowest in the middle, and becomes broader ante-
riorly and posteriorly. This is the chorda, which is nearly
completed in the middle, but still unfinished toward each end.
The area pellucida is, as before, found only toward the front
and the sides. The pear-shape of the embryonic shield seems
to have been produced mainly by its posterior part having
lengthened.
Figs. 18—23 are selected from a series of cross-sections
obtained from an embryo of this stage, and are arranged from
behind forwards.
Fig. 18, the most posterior section represented, goes through
the lateral hmbs of the horseshoe-shaped blastopore and the
yolk-plug occupying its concavity. The ectoblast, which con-
sists of only a single layer of cells at the sides, becomes gra-
dually thicker towards the median line, which it does not,
however, reach. Ata short distance from the latter, and at
28 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
the lips of the blastopore, the ectoblast turns ventralward, and
becomes lost in the mass of cells found in the axial line. It
retains, however, its columnar character for some distance
downwards. The considerable space between the two lateral
lips of the blastopore is filled almost entirely by a plug (y4. p.)
of considerable size, which projects upwards from the axial mass
of cells as far as the level of the general surface of the embryo.
The difference between the ectoblast and this plug is at once
unmistakeable and striking. While the cells in the ectoblast
are columnar and always arranged perpendicularly to the sur-
face, the cells in the plug are polygonal and without any defi-
nite arrangement. We shall return to the discussion of this
structure directly.
As just stated, the ectoblast turns downwards near the median
line, and loses itself in the axial mass. All the germinal layers
are, in fact, fused here, for the entoblast, although it has some
appearances of being differentiated, is not entirely distinct, and
the mesoblast also stretches away from this mass on each side.
Toward the sides the entoblast is yet undifferentiated ; it con-
sists of an abundant protoplasmic network with numerous nuclei,
and is full of yolk-spheres and granules. There is no question
whatever that laterally the mesoblast receives cells from the
entoblast or yolk. Especially along one line (a, figs. 18 and
20) nuclei are heaped in a special mass, from which cells are
being given off to the mesoblast. This contribution to the
mesoblast from the germinal wall is only in the posterior part,
as it is no longer observable in fig. 23, and as the germinal
wall itself, even in a more advanced stage, is found only round
the posterior part as a horseshoe-shaped ridge (fig. 5).
Having gone over the description of the various parts of this
section, let us return to the discussion of the plug (yA. p.)
which sticks out to the external surface between the lateral
lips of the blastopore. When we compare our figure 18 with
the frontal section through the yolk-plug of a Triton em-
bryo, which Hertwig (No. 6) gives in his fig. 9, Taf. ii, we
think nobody will hesitate long before concluding that the
plug in our figure is homologous with the yolk-plug of
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 29
Rusconi found in the Amphibian eggs. Allowing for the
differences between a holoblastic and a meroblastic egg, the
relations in the two figures are almost exactly alike, part for
part. If the slits between the plug and the lateral lips of the
blastopore extended in our figure a little more into the midst
of each mesoblastic mass the resemblance would be compiete ;
but even for the Amphibian eggs the slits do not always extend
as far as represented in fig. 9, as Hertwig himself mentions
(No. 6, p. 14). At any rate, in each case there is an axial
mass of cells, (1) into which the ectoblast turns down at the
lateral lips of the blastopore, (2) in which the entoblast is not
to be distinguished, (3) from which the mesoblastic masses
start away toward each side, and (4) which sends a plug upwards
between the lips of the blastopore. If we compare the longi-
tudinal section of the plug in Trionyx (fig. 24, y/. p.) with the
sagittal section of the Amphibian yolk-plug (Hertwig, No. 6,
Taf. ii, fig. 4), we see again that the relations of different parts
are alike. It is true that the plug in Trionyx is not bounded
posteriorly by a groove, and passes directly into the ectoblast
of the primitive streak, but when we consider that the plug in
Trionyx is only rudimentary this is not to be wondered at, and
is of little significance. .
We think we are justified, on these grounds, in concluding
that we have in the mentioned structure of Trionyx the rem-
nant of the yolk-plug, which appears conspicuously in the
Amphibian egg. Strahl describes the same structure (compare
No. 13, ser. iii, figs. 0, 0.1, 0.2; ser. iv, figs. 0, 0.1; ser. v,
figs. 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3; ser. vi, figs. 0, 0.1; ser. vii, fig.0.1, also
No. 9, Taf. i, figs. 6, 7, 14, and 15; and No. 10, figs. 2 and 38),
but, so far as known to us, has never explained its nature.
Kupffer describes the “ Zapfen” occupying the horseshoe-
shaped blastopore of Lacerta (No. 5, Taf. i, figs. 2 and 3, 2),
but does not state its homology. He mentions that in Coluber
Aesculapii the plug is sometimes divided into two parts by a
median fissure (No. 5, Taf. iv, fig. 40, f and g). We have
also observed a similar appearance in some of the earlier em-
bryos of Trionyx, but we are satisfied that there is no true
30 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
median fissure. What appears to be such is the optical ex-
pression of the primitive streak, along which the ectoblast is
proliferating, and giving cells to the mesoblast below. Even
in the earliest embryos with this appearance it is doubtful if
it ever extends to the extreme tip of the plug. As far as we
are aware, the only author who mentions what seems to be the
yolk-plug in an amniotic Vertebrate is Gasser, who observed
it in an abnormal fowl embryo (No. 4, Taf. x, figs.4—7). The
reason why the yolk-plug in Trionyx is more conspicuous at
this stage than earlier stands, we think, in close connection
with the fact that the blastopore has become a much better
defined horseshoe-shaped slit.
We return now from this long digression to the description
of the embryo before us. The sections behind fig. 18 show
that immediately behind the yolk-plug, which persists distinctly
in only one more section after fig. 18, the ectoblast extends
over the whole surface as shown by the characteristic columnar
cells. For ashort space, however, the ectoblast is proliferating
in the median line and is continuous with the mesoblast below.
This is seen in only three sections after which the ectoblast
becomes independent. The entoblast seems, however, to be
connected with the mesoblast for a greater length and to be
actively contributing cells to the latter. This is the region
where the germinal wall makes a horseshoe-shaped bend round
the posterior part of the embryo (fig. 5). Except in this last
detail, the relations of the various parts behind the blastopore
exactly as in the stage represented in fig. 1.
Going forward, fig. 19 passes through the blastoporic passage.
As it is directly in front of the dorsal lip of the blastopore, the
ectoblast is still continuous for a little space with the chorda-
entoblast, which as usual vaults over the passage. The columnar
cells extend to the sides also, but on the floor of the passage
the cells are polygonal, so that this part which is the continua-
tion of the yolk-plug differs in its appearance from the roof
and the sides. To this part, too, the darm-entoblast (end.) is
attached. From the entire side of the axial mass the meso-
blastic sheet goes out on each side.
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. dl
Fig. 20 passes slightly in front of the ventral opening of
the blastoporic passage. In the median line the chorda-ento-
blast (enc.) forms directly the roof of the digestive cavity,
without the intervention of the darm-entoblast (end.) which
stops at a short distance from the axial line. On the left side
of the section, more clearly than on the right, the darm-ento-
blast is seen to make a fold at its innermost point where it
abuts against the chorda-entoblast and then to turn outside
again to be lost in the mesoblast. The mesoblast is therefore
partly continuous with the chorda-entoblast and partly with
the darm-entoblast. In other words, it starts from the point
where the chorda- and the darm-entoblast meet each other. The
mesoblast cells in this region show a peculiar arrangement.
Those cells next the ectoblast are columnar and look like the
continuation of the chorda-entoblast. The cells placed ven-
trally to these are polygonal and without any definite arrange-
ment. Laterally cells are being added to the mesoblast in the
whole region of the germinal wall, but especially at a ; proli-
feration seems to take place in the posterior region even from
the outer part of the darm-entoblast, as in this section. This
is, however, confined to the part which still consists of two or
three layers of cells, and never extends to the inner part which
has only a single layer of cells, and constitutes the well
differentiated darm-entoblast.
We pass over for the present figs. 2] and 22, and come to
the most anterior section represented (fig. 23). It is in the
region of the head-fold as shown by a notch (h.f.) on one side
in the ectoblast. The darm-entoblast, which is laterally quite
thick and consists of columnar cells, is internally very thin and
becomes continuous with the chorda-entoblast near the median
line. From the point of junction as well as from the sides of
the chorda-entoblast mesoblastic cells are budding off on each
side. There is in this section a small mass of mesoblast cells
outside of the head-fold which is distinct from the main mass.
This isolation has been brought about by the ectoblast folding
downward as the head-fold; more posteriorly the lateral mass
fuses with the main mass. In this section the germinal wall
32 K. MITSUKURI AND C, ISHIKAWA.
is absent, and thus no additions are made laterally to the meso-
blast from the entoblast.
Returning to the middle region of the body, figs. 21 and 22
serve to show the first steps in the formation of the notochord.
The chorda-entoblast which in fig. 20 passed laterally without
any interruption into the mesoblast, is in fig. 21 marked off
from the mesoblast, at least in the upper part. The cells at the
border between the two are turned away from one another ;
thus the cells of the chorda are directed inwards and down-
wards, while the contiguous cells of the mesoblast are directed
outwards and downwards. The mesoblast is still united with
the darm-entoblast. As yet, the chorda is only a mass of
columnar cells. In fig. 22, five sections in front of fig. 21, the
chorda has become rounded in outline and considerably smaller
in section. The most dorsal and median cells alone are
columnar, and the remaining cells are arranged as if the more
lateral cells have folded inwards and downwards from the two
sides and met in the median line. The mesoblast is now dis-
tinctly separated from both the chorda and the darm-entoblast.
The last abuts against the chorda, but seems separate from it.
This is as far as the formation of the chorda has advanced in
this stage. In front of fig. 22 the chorda becomes wider again,
until in the region of the head-fold it is as represented in
fig. 23; a similar arrangement is found at the posterior end of
the embryo.
Fig. 24 is a longitudinal section of another embryo from the
same deposit of eggs as the one represented in fig. 3. It
passes very nearly in the median line. The blastoporic
passage is considerably narrower than in fig. 16. Its angle of
inclination to the surface of the ectoblast is now greater,
approaching more nearly a right angle; hence it has become
also much shorter than before. At the dorsal lip of the blas-
topore the ectoblast is reflected and becomes continuous with
the chorda-entoblast. Owing to the fact that the chorda is
most developed and therefore narrower in the middle region of
the embryo than in front or behind, and perhaps also to the
fact that the section is slightly oblique, the mesoblast (mes.)
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 35
appears for a short space ( *—c.) in this section. The
entoblast, which is very thick in front, especially in the
head-fold (h. f. marked by a notch in the ectoblast), becomes
suddenly reduced at the point ¢ into a thin ventral layer
(end.) which stretches posteriorly as far as the point marked
with a +, where it seems to unite with the chorda-entoblast.
From the point of junction and also continued forward from
the chorda-entoblast, the mesoblast sheet stretches forwards as
far as c, above the darm-entoblast (end.) and beneath the ecto-
blast. Behind the blastoporic passage there is a large mass of
cells projecting downward (the Endwulst). On the dorsal
surface, directly behind the passage, columnar cells are absent
for a short space. This is the longitudinal section of the yolk-
plug. Following it, the ectoblast cells appear, but cannot at
first be separated from the large mesoblastic mass, for this is the
region of the primitive streak where the ectoblast is giving off
cells below. Very soon, however, it becomes an independent
sheet. The continuation downwards of the yolk-plug forms the
whole posterior wall of the blastoporic passage, and is there-
fore seen as its floor in cross-sections. The entoblast is con-
tinuous with it at the extreme front of the “ Endwulst,” but
becomes a distinct layer on the ventral surface. The meso-
blast, utterly indistinguishable from the yolk-plug, stretches
away posteriorly. Behind the blastopore the three germinal
layers are thus fused. The mesoblast, which is separate from
the entoblast on the ventral surface of the ‘‘ Endwulst,” is
receiving more posteriorly additions from the yolk or germinal
wall.
In the next stage which we figure (figs. 4 @ and 4), the
head-fold has considerably advanced, and the amnion (am.)
covers it already so that it is not visible from the dorsal side.
The medullary folds have touched each other. At the poste-
rior end the yolk plug is included between the diverging
medullary folds.
The sections through the head region of this stage show
beautifully, and in an unmistakeable and conclusive manner, the
mode of the formation of the mesoblast and of the chorda
VOL. XXVII, PART 1,—NEW SER. Cc
34 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
dorsalis. Figs. 25—28 are selected to illustrate these
points.
Fig. 25 is the most anterior section represented. It goes
through the posterior part of the head. The amnion is closed
over it, but the digestive cavity is still widely open below. The
darm-entoblast formed by columnar cells does not reach the
chorda-entoblast, but is separated from it by an interval
where cells are most actively proliferating and
giving rise to the mesoblastic mass. Fig. 29 is a
similar section from another embryo of the same stage. Here
also the chorda-entoblast, instead of passing directly into the
darm-entoblast, is separated from it on each side by a space
where cells are actively dividing and giving rise to the meso-
blast. This figure shows also more naturally than fig. 25 that
the mesoblastic mass consists of spindle-shaped and stellate
cells arranged in such a way as to give an impression of having
radiated from their origin.
Figs. 26—28 show clearly the mode of the formation of the
notochord. Fig. 26 is two sections behind fig. 25. The
mesoblastic masses have separated from the chorda- and darm-
entoblast. The chorda-entoblast is arcuate. The darm-ento-
blast abuts against it but is distinctly separate from it. In
fig. 27, the third section behind fig. 26, the chorda-entoblast
has become a cord-like mass, against the more ventral side of
which the darm-entoblast of both sides is applied. This cor-
responds to fig. 22 of the previous stage. In fig. 28, the third
section behind fig. 27, the darm-entoblast has passed under the
notochord from both sides, and united so as to form a continuous
sheet across. ‘The formation of the notochord is thus com-
pleted.
As in the previous stage, the notochord is finished only in
the middle region of the embryo. Toward the posterior
region, in front of the ventral opening of the blastoporic pas-
sage, the chorda is in the process of formation. The mode of
formation is exactly as at the front end. Figs. 30—34 from
an embryo of nearly the same stage as that represented in figs.
4 a and 4, are introduced to illustrate this process.
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 35
Fig. 30 is the most posterior section given. It is slightly in
front of the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage, which
is still visible as a groove in the median line. The darm-
entoblast (end.), which is distinct laterally, does not reach the
chorda-entoblast, but passes into a zone from which the meso-
blastic sheet spreads away laterally, and which in its turn
becomes continuous with the chorda-entoblast. This corre-
sponds to fig. 25 or fig. 29 of the anterior region, or to fig. 20
of the previous stage.
In fig. 81 the chorda-entoblast is beginning to be marked
off from the mesoblast, which is, however, still united with the
darm-entoblast, at least on the left side. This corresponds to
fig. 21 of the previous stage.
In fig. 32 the mesoblast has become entirely separated from
both the chorda- and the darm-entoblast (excepting a little
spot on the left). The chorda-entoblast is now a compact
mass by itself, against the sides of which the darm-entoblast is
applied. This is more clearly shown on the right side than on
the left. This corresponds to fig. 26 of the anterior region, and
to fig. 22 of the previous stage.
In fig. 33 the darm-entoblast has passed some way under
the chorda which has almost the appearance of the finished
structure. This corresponds to fig. 27.
In fig. 34 the darm-entoblast has passed completely under
the chorda and forms a continuous sheet across, and the for-
mation of the notochord is finished. This corresponds to
fig. 28.
The formation of the chorda at the anterior region comes to
an end much earlier than in the posterior region, where it is
continued on until considerably later, and where the growth in
length of the embryo seems mainly to take place.
It remains now to state the fate of the blastoporic passage.
In an embryo taken out two days later than that given in
figs. 4 a and 3b, from the same deposit of eggs, in an
embryo, therefore, five days old with five or six mesoblastic
somites, the passage is no longer dorsally open. The medul-
lary canal has completely closed over it and the blastoporic
36 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
passage has been changed to the neurenteric canal. Figs. 35
a—d, will show the relations of the germinal layers round the
passage. In a, the most anterior section given, the darm-
entoblast, the notochord, the mesoblast, and the medullary
canal are all separate. In 6 the chorda has fused above with
the walls of the medullary canal, appears for a little space in
the median line on the roof of the digestive cavity, and divides
the darm-entoblast of the two sides which seem to rest against
it. In ¢ the canal opens below into the digestive cavity.
The mesoblast is now continuous with the darm-entoblast and
the walls of the neurenteric canal at the junction of the two.
In d the posterior part of the neurenteric canal has been cut.
In the next section (not figured), the cells in the axial region
are only more compact than elsewhere, and show that the
posterior wall of the canal is reached. Thus from the mass
behind the blastoporic passage (i.e. the “‘ Endwulst’’), the
posterior wall of the neurenteric canal seems to have been
developed in siti. From this mass the mesoblast is extend-
ing laterally on each side. It is not possible for us to state
exactly how the yolk-plug disappears. A part of it which
formed the posterior wall of the blastoporic passage is no
doubt changed into the posterior wall of the neurenteric canal.
A part placed more dorsally is perhaps changed directly to the
ectoblast of the general surface of the embryo.
In an embryo six days old, i. e. one day older than that of
fig. 35, the neurenteric canal still persists. In an embryo
seven days old it is no longer found. We are not in a position
to state how its disappearance is brought about.
To state briefly the principal facts brought out by our observa-
tions on the formation of the mesoblast and of the notochord :
In the embryo represented in figs. 1 @ and 4, the mesoblast
was found only in the region behind the blastoporic passage,
radiating in the shape of an open fan from the posterior wall
of the passage, as well as from the ectoblast along the primi-
tive steak, and constituting the structure called the “sickle.”
In further course of development the mesoblast becomes ex-
tended into the region in front of the blastoporic passage.
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN OHELONIA. 37
Here it arises as a paired mass, and its point of origin
is invariably at the junction of the chorda-entoblast
with the darm-entoblast. In other words, one part
of the mesoblast is always continuous with the
chorda-entoblast, while the other part passes into
the darm-entoblast.
Besides this source the mesoblast receives large contributions
of cells from the germinal wall, and even from the outermost
part of the darm-entoblast contiguous with the germinal
wall.
The notochord is formed out of the chorda-entoblast. It is
completed first in the middle, and then extends both backward
and forward. Its mode of formation is the same, both in front
and behind. First, at the point of the origin of the mesoblast
the connection of the three structures that meet there, viz.
the mesoblast, the chorda-, and the darm-entoblast, is loosened.
The mesoblast is then found as two separate masses, one on
each side of the median line. The darm-entoblast rests with
its free edges against the sides of the chorda-entoblast ; it, how-
ever, passes gradually under the chorda-entoblast, until finally
the darm-entoblast of two sides fuses in the median line, and
forms a continuous sheet over the digestive cavity. In the
meantime the chorda-entoblast has arranged itself into the
finished chorda-dorsalis.
The formation of the Blastoporic Passage.
There are differences of opinion among previous writers on
the subject in regard to the formation of the blastoporic
passage in Reptilia. Balfour (No. 2, p. 424-5) says: “ After
the segmentation and the formation of the embryonic shield
(area pellucida) the blastoderm becomes distinctly divided into
epiblast and hypoblast. At the hind end of the shield a some-
what triangular primitive streak is formed by the fusion of
the epiblast and hypoblast, with a number of cells between
them, which are probably derived from the lower rows of the
segmentation cells. At the front end of the streak a passage
arises, open at both extremities, leading obliquely forwards
38 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
through the epiblast to the space below the hypoblast.” Here
Balfour does not say how this passage arises. In his ‘Com-
parative Embryology’ (vol. ii, p. 168) he says: “At the front
end of the primitive streak an epiblastic involution appears,
which soon becomes extended into a passage open at both
extremities, leading obliquely forwards through the epiblast to
the space below the hypoblast.” Kupffer (No. 5) is of sub-
stantially the same view. Weldon (No. 14, p. 136) says: “ At
a point (dp.), however, the position of the future blastopore,
these layers are replaced by a mass of closely-packed cells
(pr.), exhibiting no division into layers, and forming the
primitive streak, which may, in some cases at least, extend
backwards as far as the commencement of the area opaca. The
blastopore commences at the anterior end of this streak as a
pit, open above and closed below. ... . The floor of this pit
presently breaks up, and the blastopore assumes its normal
condition, forming a communication between the archenteron
and the exterior, its anterior wall forming a communication
between the epiblast and the lower layer cells. From this time
a change in the character of the lower layer cells takes place,
beginning from the anterior wall of the blastopore, where they
pass into the epiblast, and proceeding forwards. Instead of
being large, irregular, full of yolk, as in the previous stages,
they become columuar, lose their yolk, arrange themselves in
a definite layer several cells deep, and take on the characters
of normal hypoblast..... This process is evidently an in-
vagination comparable to that which takes place in an Elasmo-
branch. It especially resembles the process described by
Scott and Osborne in the newt.” Strahl gave his views first
in an article published in 1882 (No. 8), and again in a later
writing (No. 13, p. 55). His views, as expressed in the latter,
are briefly as follows :—Before the neurenteric canal is present
the germinal disc consists throughout only of ectoblast and
entoblast, except in the region of the primitive streak, which
is oval or pear-shaped, or nearly triangular in form. In such
a disc three processes, which may be independent of one
another, now take place.
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 39
1. Under the primitive streak the entoblast is differentiated,
so far as it has not done so already.
2. Inthe middle of the primitive streak the canalis neuren-
tericus is sunk, at first perpendicularly below and then hori-
zoutally forward.
3. In the region of the primitive streak the ectoblast differen-
tiates from the mesoblast.” This differs in the regions before
and behind the neurenteric canal. In front of the canal the
whole mass is differentiated into the ectoblast and the meso-
blast (i. e. mesoblast according to his views: we would call it
the chorda-entoblast). In the region behind the canal, only
the epidermal layer of the ectoblast is differentiated, the
differentiation of the remaining cells into the structures for
which they are destined: viz. the extreme end of the medullary
canal, of the chorda, &c., takes place at a much later date.
As we stated before, we did not succeed in obtaining the
stages earlier than fig. 1. We will try, however, to reason back
from our earliest stages and to deduce what processes have given
rise to such a form. Of course, such a priori reasoning is
liable to mistakes, and we offer the following remarks merely as
suggestions which need verification by future investigations.
If the blastoporic passage really commences as an epiblastic
invagination, it seems to us that Kupffer is quite right in con-
sidering the invaginated sac as the gastrula cavity much reduced
in size (No.5, p. 2). But apart from the inherent improba-
bility that the bottom of the archenteron should after-
ward give way and the archenteron should become counected
with some cavity beyond itself, we think we have another
sufficient reason in rejecting the view of an epiblastic invagi-
nation in this fact that directly behind the passage, when
it is established, there is an area which is not covered by the
ectoblast, 1. e. the yolk-plug. We think then that what really
takes place must be very much as Weldon and Strahl describe
it, for these two writers differ after all, when we leave out
minor points, only in this, that the former thinks the passage
arises at the front end, and the latter at the middle of the
primitive streak. Our views, then, on these earliest stages
are as follows :
40 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
At the end of the segmentation the blastoderm becomes
divided into two primary layers, the ectoblast above consist-
ing of columnar cells, and the entoblast below consisting
of irregularly shaped cells without any definite arrangement.
At the region of the future blastopore and primitive streak,
this process of differentiation is somewhat modified from what
takes place elsewhere. When the differentiation of the ectoblast
has proceeded backward and come to the future dorsal lip of the
blastopore, it does not extend further in the median line over the
blastodermic surface, but becomes reflected downward and con-
tinuous with the axial strip of the lower layer cells which acquire
the columnar character from this point forward in the median line
of the future embryo, and arranged themselves into the chorda-
entobiast. This process has proceeded to the front end of
the embryonic shield in the embryo represented in fig. 1.
Whether there is any actual invagination of cells from the
dorsal lip of the blastopore we cannot tell, but this is of no
moment so long as the ectoblast becomes continuous with the
axial strip of the entoblast at the dorsal lip, and the arrange-
ment of the lower layer cells into the chorda-entoblast pro-
ceeds from here towards the front. We can conceive the blas-
toporic passage itself arising in this way. As the cells arrange
themselves into the chorda-entoblast, these columnar cells
separate from the cells directly behind them and thus a fissure
or canal is produced just at the same rate as the cells arrange
themselves into the chorda-entoblast. The posterior wall of
this canal would thus be composed of undifferentiated cells, as
it actually is.
While the differentiation of the ectoblast thus stops, in the
median line, at the dorsal lip of the blastopore, and the above-
mentioned changes leading to the formation of the blastoporic
passage are going on, we can suppose that the differentiation of
the ectoblast is at the same time proceeding actively in the more
lateral parts and is extending backwards and meeting in the
median line again slightly behind the blastopore (see fig. 6).
There would thus be left behind the blastopore a small space not
covered by the ectoblast. This is the yolk-plug, which is of course
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA, 4]
continuous with the undifferentiated cells forming the’posterior
wall of the blastoporic passage. From the ectoblast in the
median line behind the yolk-plug, cells begin to proliferate and
constitute the primitive streak. This may happen before the
blastoporic passage is completed (see Strahl, No. 8, Taf. xiv,
fig. 11). Proliferation begins also from the posterior wall of
the blastoporic passage. We shall then have a stage exactly
like that given in figs. 1 a and 6. When we make a careful
study of the latter embryo, some such series of changes as we
have sketched out will become an absolute necessity. Our
views are in the main like those of Weldon and of Strahl,
but we think we have filled in more details. Strahl, it is
true, says that the passage begins in the middle of the primi-
tive streak. We are inclined to think that in his figs. 8 and 9,
Taf. xiv (No. 8), he has stages in which the differentiation of
the ectoblast from the entoblast has not proceeded as far as the
dorsal lip of the blastopore. In our view, the 2nd and 8rd
processes given in his account have the closest relations to each
other. Our hypothesis also makes what takes place in Reptilia
harmonise well with the development of lower forms, especially
of the Amphibia.
Discussion of the Results of our Observations.
In an article published as early as 1875 Balfour (No. 1,
p- 208) states that “ Amphioxus is the Vertebrate whose mode-
of development in its earliest stages is the simplest, and the
modes of development of other Vertebrates are to be looked
upon as modifications of this, due to the presence of food ma-
terial in their ova.” In the same article, as well as in several
subsequent publications (Nos. 2 and 3), he endeavoured to
work out the comparison of the vertebrate development with
the idea given in the above quotation for its foundation. Above
all, he has insisted that the mesoblast always arises as paired
masses, one on each side of the median line, and that these
two masses are to be regarded as paired diverticula of the ali-
mentary canal. Recently O. Hertwig (No. 6), in connection
with the ‘‘ Coelomtheorie”’ of himself and his brother, has worked
42 K. MITSUKURI AND OC. ISHIKAWA.
out this idea very completely in Amphibia, and has also shown,
from the investigations of other workers, how the same idea
could be carried out through other classes of Vertebrata. We
need hardly say that our investigations most completely bear
out Balfour’s and Hertwig’s view. In fact, the agreement
between the development of Amphioxus and Amphibia on one
side, and of Reptilia on the other, as shown by our work, is as
complete as could be desired, when we make due allowance for
the fact that on one side is a holoblastic and on the other a
meroblastic egg. Let us examine more in detail.
When we compare our fig. 16 with Hertwig’s fig. 4 (Taf. 1,
No. 6) of Triton, we are at once struck with the close similarity
between the two, allowing for the fact that the latter represents
a whole egg, and the former only a small part of it. ‘There is
in both a passage connecting the cavity which becomes the
future alimentary canal with the exterior. This is, according to
Hertwig’s nomenclature, “die enger Theil der Darmhohle
(dh.),”’ according to ours “the blastoporic passage.” At the
dorsal lip of this passage the ectoblast in both is reflected, and
becomes continuous with the chorda-entoblast. In the region
in front of the passage the embryo consists of only the ectoblast
and entoblast. In both there is the yolk-plug behind the
passage, and contiguous with it the two primary layers are
fused, and from the fused point there stretches backward an
unpaired mesoblastic mass. Hertwig’s fig. 11, Taf. v, and
figs. 7 and 10, Taf. vi, of Rana, are essentially alike.
Hertwig’s fig. 17 (Taf. iv) is the frontal section through the
line a—d of fig. 4, Taf. 11. It passes through the beginning of
the unpaired mass of mesoblast. It presents an appearance
very similar to our fig. 8 of the corresponding region. The
ectoblast is proliferating in the median line, and giving cells
to the mesoblast.
In our figure the entoblast and mesoblast are separate, but
we have shown already that they become continuous further
forward. Hence exactly the same relations hold in this region
in Triton and Trionyx. Compare also fig. 2, Taf. vi, and fig. 5,
Taf. viii, given by Hertwig of the corresponding region in Rana.
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 43
Hertwig’s fig. 9, Taf. 11, is the frontal section through the
line c—d of fig. 4, Taf. 11. It is substantially the same as our
fig. 9, although there is a closer resemblance between it and our
fig. 18, as we have already shown.
Unfortunately Hertwig does not give a cross section of the
front region of an embryo which has not yet developed the
mesoblast; but we are sure it will be essentially like our
figs. 13 and 14, although we cannot expect to find the lateral
parts composed of a network of cells.
Now, as to the origin of the mesoblast, our results agree with
Hertwig’s account as completely as could be desired. In the
region behind the blastopore he says the mesoblast arises as an
unpaired mass in the Amphibia. Such is the case with
Trionyx, as shown in our figs. 7, 8,16, and 24. In front of the
blastopore the mesoblast arises as paired masses separated from
each other in the median line by the chorda-entoblast. For
this point compare our figs. 17 and 20, or, best of all, figs. 25
and 29, with Hertwig’s figs. 1 and 2 (Taf. ui) of Triton. In
the latter the chorda-entoblast passes into the parietal layer
of the mesoblast, while the darm-entoblast is reflected just
where it abuts against the chorda-entoblast, and passes into
the visceral layer of the mesoblast, thus constituting what
amounts to a pair of diverticula from the alimentary canal, one
on each side of the chorda, repeating what is seen in Amphioxus.
Hertwig has marked the entrance to these rudimentary diverti-
cula with a star (*) in his figures. We have also marked in
our figures what we consider to be the corresponding spots
with the same mark (*). We think that morphologists will
not find any difficulty in recognising in Trionyx the relations
closely similar to those in Amphibia. In Trionyx the meso-
blastic mass becomes continuous on each side with the ento-
blast, just at the point where the chorda- and the darm-
entoblast meet each other. The cells being much smaller in
Trionyx than in Triton, it is not possible to distinguish the
parietal from the visceral layer of the mesoblast; but if both
the chorda- and the darm-entoblast pass into the mesoblastic
mass, the relations found here amount to the same thing as
44 K. MITSUKURI AND OC. ISHIKAWA.
found in Triton and in Amphioxus. We think our figs. 25
and 29 ought to convince the most sceptical on this point. It is
significant that at one time (fig. 17) the chorda-entoblast occu-
pies a recess of the alimentary canal by itself, and from the
two sides of this recess the mesoblastic masses stretch out—a
relation which recalls vividly the development of Amphioxus.
Our fig. 19 may prove a stumbling block to some in the way
of comparison with Amphibia. But we think this figure is
soon reduced to the general rule. We have already pointed
out that the cells forming the floor of the blastoporic passage
in this figure are different from those of the roof and the sides.
If we consider the chorda-entoblast as extending on each side
to the spot marked with the star, and this spot as corresponding
with the similarly marked spot in fig. 15, Taf. iv, of Hertwig,
which passes through the corresponding part of Triton, the
comparison will become easy. ‘The apparent difficulty is
brought about by the cells of the floor being many layered in
Trionyx.
There is another point on which we wish to touch. Although
there is no doubt that the mesoblastic masses arise as what
morphologically amount to diverticula of the alimentary canal,
the development in Trionyx has so far changed from the primi-
tive method that the masses no longer form an epithelium as
in Amphioxus or Triton or even compact masses throughout,
but at places only loose masses of spindle and stellate cells
(figs. 25 and 29). This fact will, we think, answer Kolliker’s
objection, based upon the shape of cells in the mesoblast,
against the epithelial origin of the mesoblast. (We have
not access to Kolliker’s original paper but take his views as
given in Hertwig’s paper, No. 6,p.105). Kolliker is no doubt
correct in supposing that such forms are due to very rapid
proliferation.
As to the formation of the chorda, it is only necessary to
compare our figs. 25—28 with Hertwig’s figs. 3—6 (Taf. i)
of Triton, and figs. 8—11 (Taf. viii) of Rana, in order to be
convinced of the similarity of the process in Reptilia and
Amphibia. Our figs. 25 and 29 correspond with figs. 1 or 2
ia
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 45
(Taf. iii, Hertwig) of Triton. Our fig. 26 with fig. 4 (Taf. iii)
of Triton, our fig. 27 with fig. 5 (Triton), and, finally, our
fig. 28 with fig. 6 (Triton).
As to the contribution to the mesoblast from the germinal
wall, there is of course no equivalent in the holoblastic egg of
Amphioxus or Amphibia. It seems to us that phylogenetically
this source is not of much significance and is brought about
wholly by adaptation. Sarasin’s (No. 15) researches on the
Reptilian egg have brought out the fact that new cells are
added on from the yolk to the blastoderm by a process very
similar to budding. Why could we not suppose that this
process goes on until considerably later, and that the addition
of cells to the mesoblast from the germinal wall is but the
continuation of this process?
We should like to add another suggestion. In Trionyx the
primitive streak is continuous with the lateral edges of the
blastopore, enclosing the yolk-plug (see fig. 6). Have we not
here a case where a part of the original blastopore lips has
met in the median line and formed the primitive streak, while
the rest of the edge of the blastopore has retained its original
condition ?
We think we have succeeded in showing that the develop-
ment of Reptilia harmonises completely with that of Amphibia.
Our observations confirm the conclusions which Hertwig
formed in regard to the Reptilian development, basing his
judgment on the observations of other workers (No. 6, Theil ii),
but we hope we have filled in many details not before noticed.
We dissent strongly from Strahl, who in two separate publica-
tions (Nos. 11 and 13) oppose Hertwig’s views. We think
Strahl is singularly unfortunate in the interpretation of his
sections.
We think it hardly necessary to go over other papers on the
germinal layers of Reptilia (Strahl, Nos. 7, 8,9, 10,11, 12,13;
Kupffer, No. 5; Weldon, No. 14; Hoffmann, No. 16), and
point out the points of similarity and dissimilarity between
those workers and ourselves. The reader must refer to the
original papers themselves.
46 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA.
We conclude, expressing the hope that our investigations
will furnish a necessary intermediate step in establishing firmly
the views of Balfour and Hertwig in higher Vertebrates.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
1. F. M. Batrour.—“ A Comparison of the Early Stages in the Develop-
ment of Vertebrates,” ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ 1875.
2. F. M. Batrour.—“ On the Early Development of the Lacertilia, together
with,” &e., ‘Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci.,’ 1879.
3. F. M. Batrour.—‘ Comparative Embryology,’ vol. ii, 1881.
&
GassEr.—‘ Der Primitivstreifen bei Vogelembryonen,’ Cassel, 1879.
5. C. Kurrrer.— Die Gastrulation an den meroblastischen Hiern der Wir-
belthiere u. die Bedeutung des Primitivstreifs,’ ‘Arch. f. Anat. u.
Physiol.,’ Anat. Abth., 1882 and 1883.
6. O. Hertwic.—‘ Die Entwicklung des Mittleren Keimblattes der Wirbel-
thiere,’ Jena, 1883. Also found in ‘ Jen. Zeit.,’ Bd. xv, p. 287, et seq.
and Bd. xvi, p. 247, et seq. Taf. xii—xv of Bd. xv correspond to Taf.
i—iv of the separate publication, and Taf. xiv—xviii of Bd. xvi to Taf.
v—ix. We refer only to the separate publication.
7. H. Srrant.— Ueber die Entwicklung des Canalis myelo-entericus u. der
Allantois der Eidechse,” ‘ Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol.,’ Anat. Abth., 1881.
8. H. Srrant.—* Beitrage zur Entwicklung von Lacerta agilis,” ‘Arch.
f. Anat. u. Physiol.,”? Anat. Abth., 1882.
9, H. Srraut.— Beitrage zur Entwicklung der Reptilien,” ‘ Arch. f. Anat.
u. Physiol.,’ Anat. Abth., 1883.
10. H. Strant.— Ueber Canalis neurentericus und Allantois bei Lacerta
viridis,” ‘Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol.,? Anat. Abth., 1883.
11. H. Srrant.— Ueber frithe Entwicklungsstadien von Lacerta agilis,”
‘Zool. Anz.,’ No. 142.
12. H. Srrant.— Ueber Entwicklungsvorgange am Vorderende des Embryo
von Lacerta agilis,” ‘ Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol.,’ Anat. Abth., 1884.
13. H. Srrant.— Ueber Wachsthumsvorgange am Embryonen von Lacerta
agilis,” Separatabdruck aus den ‘ Abhandlung der Tenckenbergischen
naturforschenden Gesellschaft,’ Frankfurt, 1884.
14. F. R. Weitpon.—*‘ Note on the Early Development of Lacerta mura-
lis,” ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ 1888; also ‘Studies from the
Morph. Laboratory in the University of Cambridge,’ vol. ii, pt. 1, 1884.
FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONTA. 47
15. C. F. Sarastn.— Reifung u. Furchung der Reptilieneier,” ‘ Arb. aus d.
Zool.-Zoot. Inst. Wiirzburg,’ Bd. vi, 1883.
16. C. K. Horrmann.—“ Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Repti-
lien,” ‘ Zeit. f. Wiss. Zool.,’ 1884.
EXPLANATION OF PLATES II, III, IV, and V,
Illustrating Mr. K. Mitsukuri’s Paper on “The Formation of
the Germinal Layers in Chelonia.”
List of Reference Letters.
a.o. Area opaca. a. p. Area pellucida. am. Amnion. a. Line along which
nuclei are specially heaped up in the germinal wall. Figs. 18 and 20.—d/.
Blastopore. 4/. p. Blastoporic passage. ch. Notochord. ect. Hctoblast.
en. Entoblast. exc. Chorda entoblast. exd. Darm entoblast. g. w. Ger-
minal wall. 4%.f. Head-fold. mes. Mesoblast. x. Nuclei in the yolk.
sl. “Sickle.” v. 0. Ventral opening of the blastoporic passage. yh. Yolk.
yk. c. Yolk-corpuscles. yt. p. Yolk-plug. 2. Shelf-like extension into the
archenteron.
All the figures, excepting Figs. 5, 6, 14a, 16, and 35, have been drawn by
C. Ishikawa. Figs. 1—6 and 35 have been re-drawn by M. Indo.
Figs. 1—4 have been drawn with Zeiss’s A A, x 2; Figs. 7—17 with
Zeiss’s CC, x 2; Figs. 18—34 with Zeiss’s DD, x 2; Fig. 35 with
Zeiss’s B B, x 2; Fig. 5 not drawn to scale; Fig. 6 is.a diagram.
Fic. 1a.—Dorsal view of the embryonic shield from an egg just deposited.
Fic. 14.— Ventral view of the same.
Fic. 2@.—Dorsal view of the embryonic shield from an egg laid forty-eight
hours.
Fic. 26.—Ventral view of another embryonic shield of the same age from
the same deposit.
Fie. 3.—Dorsal view of the embryonic shield from an egg laid thirty-six
hours.
Fie. 4a.—Dorsal view of an embryo from an egg laid three days.
Fic. 44.—Ventral view of the same.
Fic. 5.—Ventral view of an embryo from an egg laid five days.
Fig. 6.—Diagram of the embryonic shield.
Fries. 7—15.—Series of transverse sections of the embryonic shield given
in Figs. 1a and 4, arranged from behind forward.
48 K. MITSUKURI AND OC. ISHIKAWA.
Fig. 7. Section of the region where the three germinal layers are free
from one another.
Fig. 8. Section of the primitive streak.
Fig. 9. Section passing directly behind the blastopore.
Fig. 10. Section passing just in front of the dorsal lip of the blastopore
Fig. 11. Section through the blastoporic passage.
Fig. 12. Section passing through the posterior part of the ventral opening
of the blastoporic passage.
Fig. 13. Section passing through the anterior part of the ventral opening
of the blastoporic passage.
Figs. 14 and 15. Sections passing in front of the ventral opening of the
blastoporic passage.
Fig. 14a. Section showing the shelf-like extension into the archenteron.
Fig. 16. Median longitudinal section of an embryo closely similar to Fig.
la and 6, and from the same deposit.
Fic. 17. Section passing through the ventral opening of the blastoporic
passage of the embryonic shield, similar to that given in Fig. 2@ and 4, and
from the same deposit.
Fics. 18—23.—Series of transverse sections of an embryonic shield,
closely like that given in Fig. 3, and from the same deposit. Arranged from
behind forward.
Fig. 18. Section passing through the lateral limbs of the horseshoe
shaped blastopore.
Fig. 19. Section through the blastoporic passage.
Fig. 20. Section passing slightly in front of the ventral opening of the
blastoporic passage.
Figs. 21 and 22. Sections passing through the middle region of the
shield.
Fig. 23. Section passing through the region of the head-fold.
Fic. 24.—Median longitudinal section of an embryonic shield, closely like
Fig. 3, and from the same deposit.
Fies. 25—28.—Series of transverse sections through the head region of
the embryo represented in Figs. 4a and 4, illustrating the mode of the forma-
tion of the notochord. Arranged from before backward.
Fic. 29.—Transverse section through the head region of another embryo,
closely like Figs. 4 and 4, from the same deposit.
Fics. 30—84.—Series of transverse sections from the posterior region of
an embryo, very much like that given in Fig. 4a and 4, illustrating the mode
of the formation of the notochord in that region. Arranged from behind
forward.
Fic. 35.—Series of transverse sections from the posterior region of an
embryo, with five or six mesoblastic somites, showing the neurenteric canal.
Arranged from before backward.
REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 49
On the Structure and Development of the Repro-
ductive Elements in Myxine glutinosa, L.
By
J.T. Cunningham, B.A.,
Fellow of University College, Oxford, and Superintendent of the Scottish
Marine Station.
With Plates VI and VII.
Historical.—The first zoologist who investigated the minute
structure of the generative organs and their products in the
Myxinoida was Johannes Miiller. Between the years 1835 and
1845 the great Berlin naturalist published a monograph on the
‘Comparative Anatomy of the Myxinoids,’ the parts of which
were first read before the Academy of Sciences of Berlin, and
subsequently published separately in three folio volumes. The
description of the reproductive system occurs in the last volume,
published in 1845; the contents of this volume were com-
municated to the Academy in 1842. The description is brief,
but as far as it goes I have found it in most respects correct.
I shall here quote it almost completely.
“The sexual organs hang in a long peritoneal fold on the
right side of the mesentery. The structure in Bdellostoma
and Myxine is exactly the same. The structure in the two
sexes is also completely similar, and it is very difficult to dis-
tinguish testis and ovary.
«The testes consist of a number of round and roundish
long grains (kérner), which resemble the eggs; each has an
external skin like the egg skin, and a content somewhat similar
VOL. XXVII, PART 1,—NEW SER. D
50 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
to the yolk of the egg; the substance within the testicular
vesicles consists of granules of various sizes, but all smaller than
the yolk granules. Spermatozoa at the time when the Myxine
were examined in the fresh condition (August) were not present ;
they are apparently only to be observed at the breeding season.
The most important difference between the testicular vesicles
(hodenbliischen = kérner, mentioned above) and the eggs seems
to lie in the fact that in the former the germinal vesicle is
wanting.
“The eggs are, when small, round; later they become much
elongated, and the ripe ones are very large. I have seen
them in specimens preserved in spirit as long as 6” (13 mm.).
At the time when I examined the Myxine alive the eggs were
not large. In all young eggs, besides the yolk granules, is
seen the germinal vesicle, which is very distinct; it contains,
besides smaller granula, two or three cells with nuclei which
form the germinal spot. When the eggs have become elon-
gated the germinal! vesicle lies always at one of the thin ends
of the eggs. The yolk granules are differently constructed to
the granula of the testicular vesicles ; the granula of the latter
are much smaller and round; the yolk granules are, on the
contrary, ellipsoidal, and quite similar to the yolk granules of
the Elasmobranchs, i.e. they have transverse lines on the sur-
face which indicate a differentiation of substance and recall
the amylon bodies. ‘These lines are present in the fresh con-
dition, as in Sharks and Rays.”
The following figures are given:
Taf. i, fig. 1—The right side of the abdominal cavity of a
male Myxine; the testis exposed ; natural size.
Taf. u, fig. 3.--Testicular vesicles in the mesorchium of
Bdellostoma Forsteri, natural size; the vesicles are here
large and distinct, and project from the edge of the mesorchium ;
in the former figure the separate vesicles cannot be distin-
guished.
Taf. ii, fig. 6.—Young round egg of Myxine fresh magni-
fied.
Taf. ii, fig. 7—Young egg slightly elongated.
REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 51
Taf. u, fig. 8.—Yolk granules from ripe egg of Myxine;
some are free, but some contained in a spherical capsule.
Taf. ii, fig. 5.—Ripe egg from ovary of Bdellostoma
Forsteri, natural size ; it is 3°1 cm. in length.
The description of Miiller is the only one which has ever
been given of the male generative organ of Myxine, and it
agrees in the main with the structure of the young testis,
which I shall describe in this paper; but Miller did not under-
stand completely the more minute structure of the organ, nor
recognise the significance of what he saw. At the time
when Miiller’s account of the female organ was written only
the ovarian egg was known, and his description of it is correct
except that part which refers to the structure of the germinal
vesicle. He says nothing of the development of the egg or of
its relation to the ovary. His figures have the same qualities
as his description ; they represent correctly what can be seen
by ordinary dissection without minute investigation.
The next addition to our knowledge on this subject was
made by Dr. Allen Thomson, in 1859. In the article “ Ovum,”
in ‘Todd’s Cyclopedia of Anatomy and Physiology,’ that author
gives the following very scanty account of the mature ovum
of Myxine :—“ I have found that in the Myxine glutinosa
the globular yolk is enclosed in a horny capsule of similar
consistence and structure (he has been describing the ovum of
Elasmobranchs), but of a simple elongated ellipsoidal shape ;
and in place of four terminal angular tubes there are a number
of trumpet-shaped tubular processes projecting from the middle
of the two ends, which probably serve the same purpose as the
differently shaped appendages of the ova of the shark and
skate.”
He gives a figure of the egg which has been copied in most
of the recent text-books and works on Ichthyology. It is
correct in shape, but it represents in outline the globular
ovum contained within the capsule, the former being much
smaller than the latter. It is evident, from both description
and figure, that Dr. Thomson was under the impression that
the capsule of the ovum of Myxine, with its polar processes,
52 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
bore the same relation to the ovum as the egg capsule of ovi-
parous Elasmobranchs, and that the two protective structures
were homologous. This view has been adopted on Thomson’s
authority by recent authors; Balfour, for example (‘ Comp.
Emb.’), simply refers to Thomson’s description. I have not
been able to ascertain whence Thomson obtained the specimen
on which his description is founded. It is evident, as will be
seen later, that he only examined the egg externally.
In 1862, the Academy of Sciences of Copenhagen offered a
prize for an investigation which should solve the problem of the
reproduction and development of Myxine. The prize was never
awarded, no one having undertaken the work, but in 18638 Pro-
fessor J. Steenstrup published, as a guide to any who might
attempt the research, an account of a specimen of Myxine which
contained ripe eggs. Professor Steenstrup began by remarking
that no one seemed to have seen males, and of females only
those which had young or slightly developed eggs, and that the
very young and undeveloped females were as unknown as the
males; that in the literature there seemed to be no record
that naturalists had seen individuals of less than 8 or 9 inches
long, whilst those large egg-bearing females which had pre-
viously been investigated were generally 10 to 13 inches in
length. The work of Miller and Allen Thomson had appa-
rently not come under Steenstrup’s notice. The rest of
Steenstrup’s short paper is in substance as follows :
The females of 10 to 15 inches in length have generally
been regarded as females with fully developed sexual products,
not without some reason. They have had not only a large
number of eggs which were larger than the ripe egg of Petro-
myzon, but most of them have had in addition from twelve to
twenty eggs which were } to ; inch long, and 2 to 2} lines
broad, and these eggs, which have been situated in moniliform
fashion along the margin of the ovary, have been so loosely
embedded in its folds that they easily fell out into the body
cavity. On account of the interest attaching to the question I
made a point of collecting as far as possible all the specimens
of Myxine which I could obtain, for the Zoological Museum,
REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 53
and the number was not inconsiderable. In most of the
female specimens which came to hand the large eggs were like
cucumbers in shape, tapering to both ends, but in a few speci-
mens the eggs were much thicker in proportion to their length,
and not pointed at the ends; these, like the other kind, were
arranged in a long series enclosed in the mesoarium, and
easily fell out into the body cavity. Lastly, in September,
1862, a specimen was found amongst a number sent to the
museum, in which some of the eggs not only had the same
great thickness and ellipsoidal form, but were surrounded
externally by a firmer, almost horny shell which at the ends
was provided with a number of slightly curved or S-shaped
horny threads. Each thread ends in a head with three or four
projecting lobes or hooks, and thus has a certain resemblance
to a ship’s anchor. The threads remind one of those which
project from the eggs of Sharks and Rays, just as the shell itself
reminds one of the egg capsule in those forms. The figure
here given shows both the appearance of the capsules and also
the manner in which they hang in the mesoarium, together
with large unripe eggs and a large number of small ones. The
eggs provided with threads were entangled by means of these
in the edge of the mesoarium, and with one another. Two
conclusions may be drawn from this specimen ; one, that the
eggs must be destined to be attached by means of their
threads to foreign objects or to one another ; and second, that
the females hitherto obtained have not been in the last stage
of sexual activity. It follows from the last conclusion that the
fish’s known mode of life as a devourer of carcasses must be
short and temporary even for the females, and is perhaps only
needful until the eggs have obtained a certain stage of deve-
lopment, when the animals probably pass into another mode of
existence.
Steenstrup’s account agrees with Thomson’s except in two
features: first, that the former does not describe or represent a
globular ovum inside the capsule, and second, that he figures
one end of the capsule, forming about one fifth of the whole,
detached as a kind of operculum. With reference to the
54. J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
concluding part of the above account, I have to point out
here that Myxine is not nearly so completely parasitic in its
habits as has generally been believed. I have found that it
lives for the most part concealed in soft mud, and is found in
very large numbers on muddy areas of the sea-bottom. There
is no direct evidence that it penetrates the bodies of living fish,
and although it is often brought to the surface in the bodies of
cod and haddocks which have been hooked, it is far more
frequently taken on the hooks themselves. It frequently
happens, as I have myself witnessed, that when a long line set
for haddocks, and baited with mussel or herring, is hauled up
near the mouth of the Firth of Forth, as many Myxine as
haddocks are hooked, sometimes fifty specimens of the former
being taken at one haul. I am in the habit of taking large
numbers of Myxine in eel-pots set on muddy ground at a
depth of thirty to forty fathoms off the coast of Haddington-
shire, and baited with dead herrings, cod, or haddock. Thus,
whatever the reason may be why so few perfectly ripe females
are taken, it is not because the animals in this condition no
longer bore into the bodies of fish; though the fact might be
explained by the ripe females ceasing to feed altogether.
The accounts of the egg of Myxine given by Dr. Gunther
in his “Study of Fishes,” in the ‘ British Museum Catalogue,’
and in his article “ Ichthyology” in the ‘ Encyclopedia
Britannica,’ 9th edition, are derived from the paper of Steen-
strup above quoted.
In Robert Collett’s ‘ Norges Fiske,’ which forms the supple-
mentary volume to the ‘ Vidensk. Selsk. Forh.’ of Christiania for
1874, and was itself published in 1875, mention was made of
the distribution of Myxine, and the occurrence of its eggs.
Of the latter the author says that they have been obtained by
Professor Esmarck in the Christiania Fjord, and that they are
often taken on soft ground off the coast of Finmark, or found
in the stomachs of cod. Thinking that the eggs here referred
to were eggs naturally deposited, | wrote to Mr. Collett on the
subject, and in a very courteous reply he informed me that all
the eggs he had seen, and to which he referred, were destitute
REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 55
of the characteristic polar threads; those obtained by Professor
Esmarck having been taken from the ovary of the female, and
those he himself obtained from Finmark having been given to
him by Mr. Buck, of Oxfjord, and also probably coming from
immature females. On applying to Mr. Buck himself I was
informed by him that he had only obtained the eggs from the
ovary of the female.
The only specimens of the ripe egg in the hands of natural-
ists are those obtained by Professor Steenstrup, as above
described, which are now in the Copenhagen Museum, and a
single specimen, which is in the Anatomical Museum of Edin-
burgh University. By the kindness of Professor Sir William
Turner I have had the privilege of examining the latter, but
as it is a unique specimen I was not able to cut it so as
to examine its structure. The specimen is represented in
Plate VI, fig 1, of the natural size. Externally it agrees
with the figures of Thomson and Steenstrup, except that it has
no indication of any separation of a part of the capsule to form
such an operculum as shown in the figure given by the latter
author. The length of the ovum is 25 mm., of the threads
about 5 mm. ‘The capsule or membrane enclosing the ovum is
thicker at the poles than elsewhere, and the thickened portion
can be seen to be transparent, as shown in the figure. At each
pole of the ovum there is a slight conical projection, to which
the polar threads are attached. One of these projections, the
upper in the figure, is larger than the other, and it is beneath
this larger projection that the protoplasmic disc is situated—a
fact which I infer from my study of the unripe eggs. I was
allowed to cut off a couple of threads for microscopic examina-
tion. One of these is represented in fig, 1,7. The thread is
solid, and not tubular ; its structure, as seen under a low power,
appears homogeneous, and in my investigation of the develop-
ment of the threads I have found no indication that they are
tubular in any stage of growth. The statement of Allen Thom-
son on this point is therefore erroneous, and doubtless due to
his preconceived opinion that the threads were homologous with
the processes of the egg capsule in Elasmobranchs,
56 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
The history of the specimen of the ripe ovum in Professor
Turner’s museum cannot, unfortunately, now be traced. It is
described in the catalogue as “egg of Myxine, enclosed in its
horny capsule, with its terminal openings surrounded by pro-
cesses.” This entry was made by Dr. Spencer Cobbold, but
that gentleman informed me that he received no account from
Professor Goodsir of the history of the specimen. The ter-
minal openings mentioned do not exist. Though there is a micro-
pyle at the protoplasmic pole it is doubtful if this had been seen
by Professor Goodsir. Tradition says that the specimen was
obtained by Mr. Shirley, formerly assistant in the Anatomical
Museum, and was by him dredged up from the sea-bottom. It
is certain that it was brought to the museum in the time of
Professor John Goodsir, but no record of its origin is now to
be discovered. Itis possible that Dr. Allen Thomson’s account
was founded on this Edinburgh specimen, as I have not been
able to find any indication that mature ova of Myxine ever
existed in Glasgow, where Thomson was professor.
It is much to be deplored that Dr. Thomson did not give a
complete account of the sources of his knowledge of the Myxme
ovum. I am inclined to think that the Edinburgh specimen
was taken from a mature female, like Steenstrup’s, as I have
vainly dredged for the deposited eggs with much perseverance
in places where the animals were extremely abundant.
The portions of the literature on the subject in Danish and
Norwegian were translated for me by my friend Mr. W. E.
Hoyle, M.A., of the “ Challenger” Commission Office, and to
him, as well as to Professor Turner and the several zoologists
who have given most courteous attention to inquiries concern-
ing Myxine which I addressed to them, I have much pleasure
in expressing here my heartiest thanks.
Course of the Research.—Since last June I have made
systematic efforts to obtain the ripe generative products of
Myxine, and as the animals were obtained with considerable ease
in large numbers in the neighbourhood of the Firth of Forth I
had some reason to hope for success. I have conveyed a
number of living and well-grown specimens to the aquarium of
REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 57
the Scottish Marine Station, and some of these have lived there
for six months; but they refused to feed, and probably in con-
sequence of this their sexual organs have not developed to the
mature condition. I was able to observe the normal mode of
life of the creatures when at rest and not seeking food. They
lie with their bodies entirely buried in soft mud, with the ex-
ception of the extreme tip of the snout, and in this condition
respiration is carried on by means of a current of water, which
enters at the nostril, passes into the pharynx, and after tra-
versing the gill-sacs escapes by the two branchial apertures
situated immediately in front of the liver. This current is
rendered evident by the movement of the particles of mud
caused on the escape of the water from the latter openings. I
have also obtained a large number of specimens of Myxine
from fishermen and by means of my own excursions, and as I
failed to obtain ripe eggs or ripe spermatozoa I set myself to
try and elucidate the nature and development of the ova and
spermatozoa by the minute investigation of the immature
organs.
Female Organs.—To deal with the ovaries first, careful
examination shows that the largest ovarian eggs are situated
nearest to the attached border of the mesoarium. The ovary
of Myxine agrees in structure and relations with that of other
fishes very closely ; its chief peculiarities are two in number.
Firstly, it is extremely thin from side to side, the edge where
the eggs are produced, forming a border only slightly thicker
than the mesoarium with which it is continuous: there is no
distinct boundary between ovary and mesoarium. Secondly,
the mesoarium is attached, not to the back of the body cavity,
but along the line of attachment of the mesentery with the
straight intestine. The eggs are produced at the free edge of
the ovary, which is covered by a thin epithelium; and the eggs
are produced from this germinal epithelium in the same way
as in other Vertebrates, and are surrounded after their separa-
tion by a follicle consisting of a connective-tissue capsule, and
a follicular epithelium. I have not attempted to ascertain
whether the cells of the follicular epithelium are derived from
58 Je T. CUNNINGHAM.
the germinal epithelium or produced otherwise; the former
method is that believed to obtain by the best authorities in all
Vertebrates, and I have no evidence against its occurrence in
Myxine. As the eggs grow larger by the accumulation of yolk
they pass inwards towards the attached border of the mesoarium,
the largest and oldest being always the most internal. These
large eggs appear when a specimen is first opened to hang from
the edge of the ovary, but examination of the organ in liquid
shows at once their true relations. ‘The mesoarium is con-
tinuous with the connective-tissue sheath of the follicle in the
largest ovarian egg, as well as in the small ones, along a line
which passes round the longest circumference of the ellipsoid
formed by the follicle, and the transition between the two
structures is abrupt ; the mesoarium in the immediate neigh-
bourhood of its attachment to the follicle is as thin as else-
where and is easily torn, so that the larger eggs are easily
separated, follicle and all, from the ovary when the animal is
roughly handled. The weight of the large egg causes the
mesoarium to be stretched, and each egg hangs down beyond
the edge of the ovary, seeming at first sight to be enclosed ina
bag formed by part of the mesoarium. But the relation of the
two is always as I have described above ; and it does not differ
from the relation between egg follicle and ovarian stroma in
Elasmobranchs and other Vertebrates except in the contrast in
thickness between the ovarian egg and the surrounding portion
of the ovary. In order to ascertain the structure of the fol-
licle and egg membranes I cut series of sections through the
polar portions of the largest ovarian eggs I could find. Fig. 2
represents the appearance of one of these sections passing
exactly through the pole of the egg. The egg from which the
section was taken was 16 mm. in length, and neither by external
examination nor from the sections could any trace of the polar
threads be discovered. In the section the thickest and most
external layer is the connective-tissue capsule (a), composed of
very thin interlaced fibrils with numerous small nuclei. This
layer is disposed in laminz parallel to the surface of the follicle,
and in it are numerous small elongated spaces, some of which
REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 59
are blood-vessels. The connective-tissue layer passes off into
the thin flat mesoarium (me.). On the surfaces of the latter,
as well as on the outer surface of the follicle, there is doubtless
a thin flat epithelium, but this is so indistinctly differentiated
from the connective tissue that it does not show itself in
sections except by its nuclei. Within the connective-tissue
layer is the epithelium of the follicle (6). This epithelium is
composed of elongated cells disposed with their axes perpendi-
cular to the surface of the epithelium. There are several |
layers of these cells as shown in the figure, but the layers are
not regularly arranged, in some places three, in others four or
five nuclei succeeding one another in a radial direction. At
the exact pole of the egg there is a differentiated portion of
epithelium, where a proliferation of the latter has taken place.
This portion is composed of polygonal cells which are little or
not at all elongated, and towards the egg it runs out into a
thin cylindrical process which penetrates the next layer, as
shown at e.p. Thenext layer (c) is thin and membranous. In
the living egg it is doubtless in contact with the epithelium,
and the separation between the two shown in the figure has
been produced by the action of the hardening reagents em-
ployed in the preparation of the egg. This layer as shown in
the figure appears under a low power single and homogeneous,
‘and it is Im immediate contact with the substance of the ovum
proper, or, as it is sometimes called, the vitellus. The polar
portion of the vitellus which is in immediate contact with the
membrane (c) is granular in structure, stains well, and is proto-
plasmic in nature. In this protoplasmic cap is found the
germinal vesicle, shown in some of the other figures. Beneath
the membrane (c) at other parts of the ovum there is no separate
protoplasmic layer, the yolk-discs extending to the inner
surface of the membrane. The protoplasmic cap with its
germinal vesicle forms thus a germinal disc similar to that
found in the bird’s ovum, and other meroblastic vertebrate
ova. The rest of the ovum is composed principally of yolk
elements, the elliptical vitelline discs show in the figure. The
nature of the membrane (c) must here be particularly consi-
60 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
dered ; we can obtain some probable conclusions concerning it
by referring to what is known concerning the egg membranes
in other Vertebrata. The account which Balfour gives in his
‘Comp. Emb.,’ vol. i, of the egg membranes in Craniata, is as
follows. There are three membranes which may all coexist,
or one or two only may be present. These are:
1. An outermost homogeneous membrane without striz or
fine pores, by most authors regarded as a chorion (i. e. as pro-
duced by the follicular epithelium), but by Balfour as a vitelline
membrane (i.e. as produced by the ovum itself).
2. A radiately striated membrane, internal to the former
when the two coexist, which can be broken up into a series of
separate columns. These give to the membrane its radiate
striation, but it is probable that there are fine pores between
the columns. This membrane is the zona radiata of most
authors. It is a differentiation of the outermost layer of
the yolk.
3. Within the zona radiata a third and delicate membrane
is occasionally found, especially when the ovum is approaching
maturity.
According to Balfour, the first membrane to be formed in
Elasmobranchs is the vitelline membrane, the first of the three
above defined ; this appears in some instances before the forma-
tion of the follicle, a fact which appears to show that it is
really formed as a differentiation of the protoplasm of the egg.
In Elasmobranchs this membrane attains a very considerable
development. A zona radiata is generally if not always present
in Elasmobranchii, but arises later than the vitelline mem-
brane. The zona radiata always disappears long before the
ovum isripe. The vitelline membrane also gradually atrophies
though it lasts much longer than the zona radiata. When the
egg is taken up by the oviduct, all trace of both membranes
has disappeared.
Is there any evidence to show whether the membrane (c) in
the Myxine ovum owes its existence to the ovum itself or to the
follicular epithelium? The only evidence to which I will point
at present is that the follicular epithelium is very much thicker
REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 61
at the poles of the follicle than in the equatorial region, and
the membrane in question varies in thickness with the epithe-
lium. I shall recur to the question of the nature and origin
of the membrane further on. In this paper I shall call the
membrane the vitelline membrane, using that term to include
the whole of the primary egg membranes produced within the
follicle. The term chorion will not be used, as its application
in the case of mammals to a membrane which is partly derived
from the blastoderm renders it unsuitable in connection with
primary egg membranes. The term vitelline membrane, as
used in this paper, implies no assertion as to derivation from
follicular epithelium on the one hand, or ovum on the other.
In Myxine, as will be conclusively shown in the course of what
follows, the vitelline membrane forms the sole protective covering
of the deposited ovum.
It is now necessary to trace the destiny and elucidate the
significance of the process from the follicular epithelium above
described. In the sections succeeding the one shown in fig. 2
this cylindrical process is seen to penetrate the vitelline mem-
brane, occupying a tubular cavity in the latter, and passing
through it to form a hemispherical projection on its inner sur-
face. This tubular aperture in the vitelline membrane, with
its contained epithelial cells, is shown in fig. 3, as seen under a
high power. The section lies almost in the plane of the canal,
and so exposes nearly the whole of its cellular contents, in-
cluding the hemispherical projection surrounded by the proto-
plasm of the germinal disc. ‘This cellular projection is covered
by a thin membrane continuous with the vitelline membrane,
and is not in immediate contact with the germinal disc. In
fig. 3 the outer end of the canal, that towards the follicular
epithelium, is closed, owing to the direction of the plane of the
section, but in previous sections, as stated above, the cellular
cylinder filling up the canal is seen to be continuous with the
process projecting from the surface of the follicular epithelium.
The structures now described, as I have convinced myself by
a series of sections from more than one egg, exist only at one
pole of the ovarian ovum, There is thus at one pole of the
62 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
nearly ripe ovum a tubular canal extending through the chorion,
but not open internally, filled up by a cylinder of cells project-
ing from the follicular epithelium. It is evident, on considera-
tion of the above facts, that this aperture is to form the micro-
pyle in the ripe ovum, and we have here, as will be explained
more fully below, the explanation of the process of fertilisation
in the ovum of Myxine. It is very improbable that sperma-
tozoa could penetrate such a thick dense capsule as is formed
by the vitellime membrane in the ripe ovum, and thus the
presence of a micropyle is necessary. Another point of some
interest in this connection is that we have here for the first
time the complete history of the origin and formation of the
micropyle in a vertebrate ovum. A micropyle is known to
exist in many Teleostean ova, but little investigation has been
made as to how the structure is produced in the course of the
ovarian development of the ovum.
In a paper which has recently come into my hands (‘‘ Studien
uber das Hi,” ‘Mémoires del’Acad. Imp. St. Peters.,’ 1885), Ph.
Owsjannikow describes some observations on the micropyle in
the ovum of Osmerus eperlanus, the comparison of which
with my description and figures is very interesting. The eggs
studied by Owsjannikow were not naturally shed, but taken
when almost ripe from the ovary. In this condition the layer
of follicular epithelium, or granulosa, as the Russian investi-
gator calls it, is frequently found attached to the egg mem-
brane. The egg membrane consists of two layers, called zona
radiata externa and zona radiata interna. A micropyle
pierces both of these layers, and is expanded like a funnel
externally. A conical projection from the granulosa was seen
to extend into the micropyle. This conical projection was not
solid as in the case of Myxine, but hollow, forming a lining to
the micropyle. A thin thread was seen to extend from the end
of the funnel-shaped opening in the external zona, through the
internal micropyle, which was a narrow canal in the internal
zona. Hallez, loc. cit.
6 T use this term to imply simply the type, whatever that may have been,
which is now ontogenetically represented by the trochospheres.
118 WwW. F. BR. WELDON.
homologous in the two cases. But the pharyngeal appendix
of Histriobdella carries three chitinous teeth, showing that this
organ may in some cases develope skeletal structures; and
when once this is ascertained the resemblance to the Molluscan
odontophore becomes obvious. Further, in Terebella, and
other Polycheets, the pharyngeal armature is developed from a
ventral and posterior diverticulum of the stomodzeum
(fig. 14), which is apparently homologous with the correspond-
ing diverticulum of the Archiannelid pharynx. The wide dis-
tribution which some organ of this kind had among the Tro-
chozoa is evident from its persistence in the larve of such
creatures as Sipunculus and many others.
It sems, therefore, legitimate to conclude that in the pha-
ryngeal appendix of Dinophilus and the Archiannelids we have
a persistent record of some ancestral organ from which deve-
loped the stomodeal armature of least the Molluscs and
Cheetopods, and probably also of Rotifers and Crustacea.
As for the derivation of Dinophilus and the forms which it
represents from simpler types, there are, as Korschelt has
already pointed out, many features which connect it with the
Rhabdoceel Turbellarians. The body cavity and excretory
system especially are in exactly the same condition as those of
a Rhabdoceel with well-developed ccelomic spaces, such, for
example, as Mesostoma.
It is commonly stated that myo-epithelial cells are absent
from the ectoderm of Rhabdoceels, and that the muscle-fibres
are in this group devoid of nuclei. I hope, however, shortly
to show that, in Convoluta at least, certain of the ectoderm
cells have a structure practically identical with that just
described in Dinophilus.
The only characters of importance which separate Dino-
philus from the Rhabdoceels are, the possession of an anus,
and the metameric repetition of ciliated bands. Of these, the
second may very possibly have arisen within the limits of the
genus, since D. vorticoides is uniformly ciliated; but in
any case we havein Allostoma!? a precisely similar formation
' Graff, ‘ Monographie der Turbellarien,’ Bd. i, Taf. 19.
ON DINOPHILUS GIGAS. 119
of a single ciliated ring in an undoubted Rhabdocel. The
assumption of a pelagic life might easily cause in any Rhab-
doceel a hypertrophy of the cilia in certain definite regions and
the consequent appearance of ciliated bands; and it seems safe
to predict that a more thorough investigation of the pelagic
inhabitants of those warm seas which are most favorable to
the development of surface faunas will reveal the existence of
genera in which this character has been developed.
The researches of Lang on Oligocladus and Cyclo-
porus? have shown that at least in Polyclads there is no diffi-
culty in the temporary establishment of an anus in any region
of the body, and when this is once recognised the passage from
a temporary to a permanent condition is easy.
The pharynx of Dinophilus and of the lower Chetopods
offers another strong proof of Turbellarian affinities. Oncom-
paring the diagrams given in figs. 11 to 16 we see that the
stomodeum of Dinophilus, Polygordius, and Histriob-
della possesses a posterior muscular thickening lying in the
wall of a lateral outgrowth from the pharynx, which is in all
cases conceivably, and in Dinophilus certainly, eversible. In
the embryo Terebella (fig. 14) a similar posterior outgrowth
from the stomodzum exists, which subsequently” envelopes
the whole circumference of the pharynx, and constitutes the
rudiment of the pharyngeal armature. In Nais (fig. 15) we
have a similar muscular thickening on the anterior wall of
the stomodeum.
These facts receive at least a plausible explanation, if we
suppose that the various forms of pharyngeal apparatus just
mentioned are derived from a structure which primitively sur-
rounded the whole organ, persistence in the posterior region
only being in such forms as Polygordius, perhaps associated
with the filling up of the prz-oral lobe by the brain, while the
existence of an elongated proboscidiform prostomium in Nais
renders it most convenient to preserve the musculature in
front. But such a circumeesophageal apparatus as is here in-
1 Lang, op. cit., pp. 155, et seq.
2 Salensky, ‘ Archives de Biologie,’ t. iv.
120 WwW. F. BR. WELDON.
dicated is exactly furnished by the Rhabdoccl pharynx
(fig. 16).
We seem, therefore, to have in Dinophilus a form which,
related on the one hand to the Archiannelids, retains on the
other many features characteristic of the ancestor common to
those groups (especially Cheetopods, Gephyreans, Mollusca,
Rotifers, and Crustacea) which possess a more or less modified
trochosphere larva ; and of these the relations of the body cavity,
of the excretory system, and of the pharynx, seem to point
unmistakeably to a Turbellarian origin.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE X,
Illustrating Mr. W. F. R. Weldon’s Paper ona “Species of
Dinophilus Gigas.”
List of Reference Letters.
aa. Anus. c.p. Cephalic ciliated pits. cz. Transverse ciliated bands.
BE. Hye. e. gi. Gland cells of lips. gv. Granular cells of ectoderm. 4%. ph.
Horizontal diverticulum of pharynx. Zz. Intestine. /.m. Longitudinal muscle-
fibres. J. Mouth. m. ph. Muscular appendix of pharynx. m. ep. Myo-
epithelial cells of ectoderm. MMe. Median lobe of gonad. we. Position of
observed nephridia. x. 7. Nerve-fibres. 2. g. Nerve-cells. 2.7. Lateral
nerve-cord. «@. Csophagus. 7. m. Circular muscles. s¢. Stomach. s. A.
Cephalic sense hairs. sh'. Post-cephalic rings of sense hairs. w. Deep cells
of cephalic ectoderm. Sr. Brain. S¢. Stomodeal musculature.
Fies. 1—10.—Dinophilus gigas.
Fig. 1. The live animul extended, seen by transmitted light.
Fig. 2. A specimen contracted by treatment with corrosive sublimate
solution, but not otherwise distorted. This figure shows fairly well the
shape assumed on irritation by the live creature.
Fig. 3. A transverse section through the pre-oral lobe.
Figs. 4—6. Transverse sections through the pharyngeal region.
ON DINOPHILUS GIGAS. 121
Fig. 7. The muscular bulb of the pharynx, in transverse section.
Fig. 8. Section through the middle of the trunk.
Fig. 9. Section through junction of stomach and intestine.
Fig. 10. Section of ventral ectoderm. Zeiss’s im., oc. 2.
Figs. 11—16.—Diagrams of various forms of pharyngeal apparatus, as
seen in longitudinal sections of the head.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig, 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.
Dinophilus (original).
Polygordius (schematised from Uhljanin).
Histriobdella (schematised from Foettinger).
Terebella larva (schematised from Saleusky).
Navis (schematised from Vejdovsky).
Vortex (schematised from von Graff ).
VOL. XXVIII, PART 1.—NEW SER. I
%
i ia i be |
ie Dot res +
- svaene uo aE ray eh vale 7
- a Praaee
haf a >
- 4 : 35 u
vith een eu ant wail (er iu 7 a cui: ’
ae : PO eel pants,
i
‘il
bs
_ . ; ; a
ree he AIMAFSTLy ICY Tis), Pie i ge
+ _ meer | “Pia et ae hat fi or
» | Te
ine yc Terie fi Th Tle ivi - ATA oi
7 ave wre es ie te
ux
1 Ohi Pap Gir i tee 4)
ry Lee tem) ae ee ad
oy
ag Lim a ‘ \su0 Ge tae
: ! on ’ i 4 bee a“) vl had
= &
‘Pe | ae ‘eae
" ifn’ hod ae) Fs
= ,
~~
N
Nh, WAR woe Ale
s
4
P .
a
The Development of the Mole (Talpa Europea).
STAGES E to J.
By
Walter Heape, M.A.,
Resident Superintendent of the Plymouth Laboratory of the Marine Biological
Association of the United Kingdom.
With Plates XI, XII, and XIII.
Durine the preparation of the following paper I have been
conscious that a considerable proportion of the matter included
is of little special interest; at the same time it has appeared
to me that the course of the development of certain organs in
the Mole deserves to be recorded, and in order to do so satis-
factorily I have been compelled to mention much which is not
different from embryological phenomena already observed in
other Vertebrates.
I have further been led to hope that a somewhat complete’
account of the development of one of the Insectivora will not
be without value.
To facilitate reference I have described the development of
the embryo in stages, which, in continuance with the stages of
growth described in a former paper (No. 8), will be called
Stages E, F,G, H,and y. A summary of the various sections of
this paper will be found on p. 150.
EXTERNAL FEATURES.
Stage E—The youngest embryo which I have figured (fig. 1)
lies flat upon the surface of the blastodermic vesicle. The
embryo is ‘76 mm. long, and is narrow in the centre and wider
VOL, XXVII, PART 2.—NEW SER. K
124 WALTER HEAPE.
at eachend. A shallow medullary groove runs down the centre
of the long axis of the embryo, which in its turn is narrow in
the centre and wider at either end. On each side the medul-
lary groove in the central narrow portion of the embryo, three
protovertebre may be seen already formed.
The hinder end of the embryo is thickened owing to the
growth of the mesoblast of the primitive streak, while anteriorly
it is flattened out to form the cephalic plate. The shaded
portion surrounding the embryo (a.p.) is the extent of the
area pellucida at this age.
Fig. 2 represents a slightly older embryo of the same stage
of growth (1°82 mm. long). The medullary folds have here
begun to form, they are raised somewhat, and in the centre of
the embryo are already approximated. At the anterior end the
floor of the medullary groove, on either side, is swollen, and on
the outer and anterior edge of the two masses so formed a deep
narrow groove indicates the commencement of the formation
of the optic organs and will be referred to as the “ optic
grooves.”
This early appearance of the organ of sight 1s, so far as I am
aware, peculiar, and is worthy of notice; even at this age the
grooves are directed outwards and downwards, and have their
origin from the most anterior portion of the medullary groove.
The curved condition of this embryo is due to careless manipu-
lation whilst it was in a fresh and soft state.
Stage F. — Fig. 3 represents an embryo of this stage of
growth ; it is 1:96 mm. long. The medullary folds have met,
although they have not yet coalesced, in the middle of the
embryo, and have extended thence forwards.
The anterior end of the medullary canal is, however, still
widely open, and the two thickenings of the floor and sides of
this portion are shown. The optic grooves are also indicated
in the same manner as they were in the previous figure.
It will be observed that the sides of the medullary canal at
the anterior end have grown forwards in advance of the floor.
At the hind end the medullary canal is widely open, forming
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOLE. 125
the sinus rhomboidalis. On either side of the embryo, just
behind the widely open anterior end of the medullary canal, a
ridge extends backwards and onwards over the blastodermic
vesicle ; these ridges are the first traces of the two tubes which
will eventually form the heart (compare fig. 5, hi.).
Figs. 4 and 5 are two drawings of an embryo of about
the same age as that last described (Stage r). The length of
the latter is, however, greater than that of the former embryo,
being 2°12 mm., while the medullary groove is not so far ad-
vanced in development. My object in drawing fig. 4 is not
only to show these points but to represent the amnion, which
is as yet developed only at the hind end of the embryo,
and has already grown nearly half way over the back of the
embryo.
Fig. 5 is a transparent view of the same embryo, and indi-
cates the position of the first five protovertebre, and of the
commencing tubes (At., ht.) which eventually will form the heart.
The blind lateral prolongations of the medullary groove at the
cephalic end are the optic grooves. In this figure also the
floor of the sinus rhomboidalis at its posterior end is seen to
contain a much thickened, forwardly projective knot, which, as
will be shown in sections, is the anterior end of the primitive
streak. The medullary folds may therefore be described as
extending posteriorly behind the front end of the primitive
streak.
Stage G.—Stage a is represented by the embryo drawn in
fig. 6. The hinder portion of the medullary canal is much
the same as before; anteriorly, however, development has pro-
gressed, and the edges of the medullary folds have come
together and partially fused up at the anterior end of the
embryo. At the extreme end, however, a pore is left, owing
to the more rapid growth of the sides than of the floor of the
canal as pointed out above. At this stage, therefore, the
neural canal is still open to the exterior, both anteriorly and
posteriorly.
The optic grooves are now closed, and have given rise to the
126 WALTER HEAPE.
optic vesicles ; these are shown as two bud-like vesicles pro-
jecting outwards and backwards, and slightly downwards from
the front end of the neural tube ; behind them the swelling of
the fore-brain is discernible, while still further backwards and
at the edge of the body of the embryo the two tubes of the
heart are indicated.
The folding off of the embryo from the yolk-sac has at this
stage made some progress, and, indeed, the whole of the head
of the embryo as far back as the line so. pl. now lies projected
freely above the blastodermic vesicle.
Stages H and J.—These stages are depicted in figs. 7 and 9,
the embryo represented in the former figure being 2:2 mm.
long, that in the latter figure 3°06 mm. long. The more com-
plete closure of the medullary canal and the constriction of its
anterior region into fore-, mid-, and hind-brains is to be noticed.
The optic vesicles are still seen in fig. 9; in fig. 7 they are
barely noticeable, owing to the curved position of the embryo
when drawn.
The increase of the protovertebrz and the gradual reduction
of the sinus rhomboidalis is also seen, while the thickened
anterior end of the primitive streak is now enclosed within
the posterior walls of the medullary canal, and projects up-
wards as a rounded knob at its hinder end.
The direction of the increase of the protovertebre is a
difficult matter to determine, but a careful examination and
measurement of figs. 5, 7, and 9 leads me to believe that in all
probability the increase is almost altogether posteriorwards
during those stages. The embryo (fig. 7) of Stage u has,
however, apparently one protovertebree more anteriorly than
the embryo of Stage F (fig. 5), and the embryo (fig. 9) of
Stage s one more than that of Stage u (fig. 7). The embryos
of Stages & and F are more difficult to compare (figs. 1 and
5), but I think it is highly probable the increased number in
the latter is due to a backward growth.
The amnion at Stage n completely covers the embryo (fig.
7), an anterior limb having grown over the head as the
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOLD. 127
posterior limb grew over the tail at an earlier period (Stage r,
’ fig. 4).
The anterior fold of the amnion (vide p. 146) is the so-called
pro-amnion of Beneden and Julin (No. 2). It must be noted
that up to the close of Stage s no signs of a folding off of the
tail end of the embryo can be observed, and, indeed it is not
until considerably later that this process takes place.
The first junction of the two tubes to form the heart takes
place during Stage u, and is shown in fig. 8; while the side
view of the head of the embryo drawn in fig. 10 (Stage J)
shows the relation of the heart to the visceral arches, and the
arrangement of the latter.
There are at this stage five visceral arches. Faint grooves
indicating the partial formation of two and even three visceral
arches may be discerned during Stage u, but it is not until
Stage 5 is reached that they can be satisfactorily outlined.
For the comparison of these figures with figures of other
mammalian embryos I would refer to papers Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
9, and 10.
Tue EPrisiast.
Soon after the epiblast is first definitely produced it is in the
form of a plate of columnar cells of uniform thickness over the
whole embryonic area, and passing abruptly at the edge into
the flattened epiblast cells which cover the remainder of the
embryonic vesicle. This stage is figured in a former paper,
No. 8, fig. 30.
During the primitive streak stage of growth and the early
formation of the medullary groove, the lateral epiblast becomes
reduced in thickness and at the edge of the area the cells
gradually assume a flattened condition and blend without
a break with those of the vesicle (l.c. figs. 32—36, and
43—46).
The appearance of protovertebre and the deepening of the
medullary groove is attended by a further modification of the
epiblast of the embryo.
During Stages & to c the median portion becomes thickened
128 WALTER HEAPE.
and forms the medullary plate (fig. 15) while the lateral por-
tions become gradually still more reduced in thickness, until in
those portions of the embryo where the medullary groove has
attained its greatest depth prior to its conversion into a canal
the lateral epiblast is formed for the most part of a single row
of somewhat cubical cells, continuous, without modification,
either over the vesicle or across the embryo as the inner fold
of the amnion (fig. 17).
Where the lateral epiblast joins the wall of the medullary
groove there is now an abrupt transition from the columnar
cells lining the latter to the cubical cells of the former.
Subsequently, Stages H.J., in that portion of the embryo
where the neural canal is formed, the closure of the medullary
groove causes the approximation of the lateral portions of the
epiblast, which fuse, and thus form a continuous layer across
the embryo. The cubical epiblast cells at the same time become
much flattened on the dorsal surface of the embryo (figs. 26, 29,
and 47), while (1) in the trunk, the cells of that portion of epi-
blast which overlies the somatic mesoblast remain cubical
(figs. 26, 27, 29, and 47); and (2) in the anterior region, the
cells of certain portions which either give rise to sensory
structures (figs. 25 and 46), or which surround externally the
visceral arches (figs. 23 and 46) assume again a columnar
form.
In that region of the trunk where the medullary canal is
still open the lateral epiblast cells remain as before, cubical.
The Medullary Groove.—At the commencement of Stage E
a deep medullary groove exists about the middle of the embryo ;
anteriorly and posteriorly it is shallower however, finally ter-
minating in the latter direction upon reaching the anterior end
of the primitive streak, while in the former direction all trace
of the groove is lost some considerable distance behind the front
end of the embryo.
Beyond the anterior end of the medullary groove the epiblast
is thickened to form the “ cephalic plate.”
Fig. 1 is a transparent view of an embryo with three proto-
vertebr, and shows the relations above mentioned; I have
THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOLE. 129
also figured three transverse sections, which indicate the struc-
ture and form of (1) the cephalic plate (fig. 12) ; (2) the groove
in its anterior portion (fig. 14); and (3) the groove in its
posterior portion (fig. 15).
In fig. 12 the thick cephalic plate is shown, becoming folded
off from the yolk-sac; fig. 14 is taken from the region in front
of the protovertebre, and depicts the wide and shallow groove,
the wall at the bottom of which is considerably thinner than
at the edge of the groove ; and in fig. 15, taken from the region
of the second protovertebra the medullary groove is V-shaped,
and the columnar cells of which it is formed pass abruptly into
the lateral epiblast cells, thus indicating the extent of the
“medullary plate.”
At the hind end the wide and shallow medullary groove
forms the so-called “sinus rhomboidalis.” ox al’ male
iw Cae baie iy fa) ewlinad IAC igeel Ba aA AE vob OD
ai iarta we Vir Alahedth: al): red por nite (Gb tie @ \
ae ipiiat ai caver alt ror cw ait bate ea AV 9 Ape
el ae a ee ‘yen nets a, Gal Pe rE
ia
etbAd dias les (icine) Calireced Anaset RRs
Wadi Vos anhiid bv deeb Ue neacilotie Glo lw
Wr aS een! mT wT ; livid Sits yw goiter til
errand
dain ig rT ee
si yal Mh wok vst Due outs
~ eeiintw Ais im nminw wei) Pb PPLuryy RS sae A
a ; uh mealaiiD ‘ ify seiie Mpa -f.9B) Mir i
Rey |
* i ‘ = ‘ pan ies Te eine 5
7 F is
ries) tie acl i - . we 1
’ a
sbibe LSet od ’ ot Us AL Sh aie . “e
i efi 5 y yyehe } 7 mr ng
; ay
havin ~ nis § ae Gh eens ‘uot pb ete \
di. | 2) Je iy ae.
fl alae i: :
rae
\ ea TN
r, iv ile
‘ iad
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 165
On the Presence and Structure of the Pineal
Eye in Lacertilia.
By
W. Baldwin Spencer, B.A.,
Fellow of Lincoln College, Assistant to the Linacre Professor of Human and
Comparative Anatomy in the University of Oxford.
With Plates XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX and XX.
Tue following work has been carried on in the morphological
laboratory of the University of Oxford. It has been made
possible solely through the kindness of Professor Moseley,
whose invaluable assistance in various ways, especially in
procuring from different sources the necessary specimens, I
here desire to acknowledge with sincere thanks.
Historical Account.—Though it was impossible for the
external indication of the important organ which forms the
subject of the following pages to escape the notice of naturalists
and more especially of those dealing with the classification of
the group, consisting as it does in the modification of a median
scale upon the dorsal surface of the head, yet it is strange that
only within a very recent period has there been any thorough
investigation of the structures lying beneath. This is perhaps
chiefly to be accounted for by the fact that the structure in
question lies usually within the parietal foramen, enclosed
tightly by bone and connective tissue, and is thus left intact
within the skull on removal either of the skin from the external
or the brain from the internal surface.
Brandt,’ writing in 1829, uses the following words when
describing the skull of Lacerta agilis. ‘ Hinterhaupts-
1 © Medizinisch Zoologie,’ 1829, Bd. i, p. 160.
166 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
schilder 4; selten nur 3; die beiden mittelsten hintereinander
stehenden, die kleinsten, das obere, grdssere regelmassig
5-eckig, meist mitten, mit einer runden, vertieften stelle,” and
he adds in a foot-note, “ Eine eigne Driisenstelle bezeichnend.”
The external marking on the surface of the head is not repre-
sented in the drawing of L. agilis (fig. a, Tf. xix), but his
description shows that he recognised the presence of an internal
modification corresponding to the specialised scale.
Milne Edwards! and Dugés? both figure the external modi-
fication in certain lizards, but neither, strangely, make the
slightest mention of it in their descriptions of the animals.
Leydig,® writing more than forty years later, is apparently
the first to point out with any clearness the presence of the
organ, and to give some account of its structure and of the
development of the epiphysis, though he entirely failed to dis-
cover the relationship existing between the two. Under a
high power, he says, the body in question which lies ‘‘ above
the thalamencephalon or the region of the third ventricle,” is
seen to consist of long cells similar to those of a cylindrical
epithelium, so arranged that they form altogether a shallow pit
with a circular outline; the rim of the pit is turned upward,
and has a thick black girdle of pigment; “ welcher schon fiir
das freie Auge das Organ sehr bemerklich macht.” After stating
that it has a special blood supply, he goes on to say: “ Das
Organ ist keineswegs, woran Man zuniichst denken konnte,
die embryonale Zirbel, dem diese folgt erst darunter und ist
von ganz anderer Beschaffenheit.”’
“ Fragliches Gebilde entspricht ferner der Stelle, wo sich am
skeletirten Schadel des fertigen Thieres im spateren scheitel-
beine, das oben schon erwahnte kreis runde Loch befindet.”
He examined the organ in Lacerta agilis, L. muralis,
L. vivipara, and Anguis fragilis. On pl. xii (fig. 159) he
1 « Recherches Zoologiques pour servir a Vhistoire des Lézards,” ‘ An. Sci.
Nat.,? 1829, tom. xvi, p. 50.
2 « Mémoire sur les especes indigenes du genre Lacerta,” ‘ An. Sci. Nat.,’
1829, tom. xvi, p. 337.
3 «Die Arten der Saurier,’ 1872, p. 72, Taf. 12.
PINEAL EYE IN LAOCERTILIA. 167
draws asection at right angles to the long axis of the head in L.
agilis, passing through the organ in question, which he calls the
“ Stirn Organ,” and the pineal gland. Speaking of this section
he says: “ Man gewinnt dadurch die Ueberzeugung das es
sich um eine innerhalb der Epidermis besonders abgegrenzte
Partie handelt ; und zwar einer solchen, welche von kugeligen
Umriss und zelliger Zusammensetzung tber der Oeffnung im
Scheitelbein ruht. Unmittelbar unter dem Knochen in der
gleichen senkrechten Linie steht die Zirbeldriise. Sollen etwa
die Lagen des Schnittes genauer aufgezahlt werden, so folgt
von aussen nach innen zuerst die Hornschicht der Epidermis ;
dan die Schleimschicht und das kugelige zellige, Organ in ihr ;
darauf die nicht ossificirte, stark schwarz pigmentirte Theil
der Lederhaut ; alsdann der Knochen mit seinen Markratimen,
welche gegen die Oberflache gedffnet sind. Unterhalb des
Knochens kommt die wieder stark gefarbte harte Hirnhaut,
und unter dieser, ihr angeheftet die Zirbel; sie verbindet sich.
durch zwei nervése‘Schenkel mit dem Gehirn.”
He describes also the presence of the organ in Anguis
frygeélis; it is present as a small dark spot on the thalamen-
cephalon of very young embryos (cf. Tf. xii, fig. 160), whilst
in somewhat older embryos (fig. 162), in addition to the spot,
a dark streak is present lying above the unpigmented part,
which he recognises as the true pineal gland as well as “ ein
kleiner unpigmentirter Korper, wie ein winziger Higel bemerk-
bar ” (fig. 163, c).
These three parts are distinct from the epiphysis itself, and
can be seen on removal of the skin from the head. Further,
it is evident that the black spot and the black streak are of a
similar structure, the walls of each are composed of long
cylindrical cells so arranged in the streak as to bound a clear
space (see fig. 163), whilst at the black spot they enclose a pit
“die vielleicht als Ausgang jener Lichtung zu deuten ist.’ .
The cells of both structures have pigment at their inner ends
bounding the cavities, the pigment in those of the “spot”
being much deeper than in those of the “streak.” With
regard to the epiphysis, he says: “ Die Zirbel deren Stiel aus
168 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
zwei Schenkeln besteht, liegt unterhalb des ‘ Punctes’ und
‘Streifens,’ und zeigt sich als etwas von beiden wohl verschie-
denes. Ihre Oberflache hat das schon gedachte, faltige Aus-
sehen, das ich auf eine Zusammensetzung aus gewundenen
Schlatichen bezog. Doch erhielt ich auch den Eindruck, als
ob es sich um eine blasige Bildung mit Faltung der Oberflache
handle. Die Zirbel ist vollig unpigmentirt.” As to the nature
and function of the structure, he says: ‘“‘ Wie das Organ zu
deuten sie, wird im Augenblick wohl Niemand zu sagen sich
im Stande fiihlen. Doch kann ich nicht umhin, einstweilen
an die ‘ Stirndriise’ der Batrachier zu denken und etwas dieser
Bildung verwandter zu vermuthen.”
In 1882 Rabl Riickhard,! dealing with the development of
the epiphysis in the Trout, stated that the pineal gland appears
early in the median line on the dorsal surface of the brain,
between the first and second brain vesicles, as an outgrowth
which admits of close comparison with that of the primary optic
vesicles. This resemblance led him to the idea of the pos-
sibility, supposing certain secondary developments of epiblast
(to form a lens) and of mesoblast took place, that the pineal
gland might become transformed into an eye just as are the
optic vesicles. This result—the formation of an eye more or
less closely similar to the paired eyes—is of course precisely
that which does not obtain in Lacertilia, where no such secon-
dary development from epiblast and mesoblast takes place.
He says: “ Allein wahrend diese unter Mitmirkung des sich
zur Linse einstiilpenden Ectoderms und des Mesoderms com-
plicirte Veranderungen eingehen, die schliesslich zur Ent-
wickelung des héchst entwickelten Sinnesorganes, des Auges,
fiihren, sehen wir an der Zirbeldriise trotz der giinstigen Lage
ihres distalen Endes dicht unter dem Ectoderm nichts der-
gleichen. Mann denke sich eme ahnliche Wucherung und
ihre Folgen, wie an dem die Augenblasen bedeckenden Kcto-
derm, das Auftreten von Pigment im sich betheiligenden
Mesoderm und nichts steht der Vorstellung im Wege, dass
1 “Zur Deutung und Entwickelung des Gehirns der Knockenfische,” ‘ Arch,
f, Nat, und Phys.,’ 1882, p. 111,
+
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 169
sich aus der Zirbel ein den Augen ahnliches unpaares Sinnes-
organ entwickelt. Interessant ist, dass diese Gegend in einen
bestimmten embryonstadium bei Reptilien (Lacerta, Anguis)
eine ahnliche Entwickelung wenigstens andeutungsweise zeigt
und dass hier am Scheitelbeine des fertigen Thieres sich ein
kreisrundes Loch befindet.”
In a subsequent paper, which I have not had the opportunity
of seeing, but a quotation from which is given by the author ina
recent note to the ‘Zoologischer Aunzeiger,”! he apparently makes
a further suggestion with regard to the pineal gland, and says
“ Das Schadeldach der riesigen fossilen enaliosaurier des Lias
des Ichthyosaurus und Plesiosaurus besitzt ein unpaares Loch,
welches seiner Lage nach mit dem Loch in Scheitelbein der
Saurier tibereinzustimmen scheint. Vielleicht lag auch hier
das viel entwickeltere Zirbelorgan mit seinem distalen Endtheil
zu Tage, und man konnte sich vorstellen, das seine Leistung
nicht sowohl die eines Sehorgans als die eines Organs des
Warmesinnes war, dazu bestimmt, seine Trager vor der zu
ntensiven LEinwirkung der tropischen Sonnenstrahlen zu
warnen, wenn sie in trager Ruh, nach Art ihrer noch lebenden
Vettern der Crocodile, sich am Strande und auf den Sand-
binken der Liassee sonnten.”
Ahlborn? has described carefully the structure of the epi-
physis in Petromyzon, giving a series of drawings to illustrate
the histology of the part and its attachment to the brain.
He follows Scott in saying that it arises as a glove-finger-
shaped outgrowth on the hinder part of the roof of the thala-
mencephalon in front of the posterior commissure and behind
the ganglion habenule.
In the adult, according to Ahlborn, the basal proximal part
is reduced to a mere rudiment, whilst the most distal portion
of the pineal gland has acquired a secondary fusion with the
1 ‘Zool. Anzeig.,’ 21st June, 1886, “ Zur Deutung der Zirbeldrise.” The
paper referred to here was, of course, published subsequently to Ahlborn’s
paper, “ Ueber die Bedeutung der Zirbeldrise,” published in 1884.
2 «Untersuchungen tiber das Gehirn der Petromyzon,”’ ‘ Zeit. f. Wiss,,’
1883, p. 230, Tf. 13 and 16,
170 W. BALDWIN SPENOER.
terminal division of the left ganglion habenule, whereby is
simulated the existence of a primitive genetic connection of the
epiphysis with the anterior roof of the thalamencephalon.
In the epiphysis Ahlborn states that three parts can be dis-
tinguished clearly separated off from each other.
(1) A hinder thread-like stalk.
(2) Two anterior vesicles lying upon one another (Taf. xiii,
fig. 2, and Taf. xvi, figs. 43, 44, 46, and 47). The latter form,
the “ Weisse kuchenartige Masse,”’ which Wiedersheim recog-
nised as the primitive pineal gland, and lie above the point of
the beak-shaped roof of the thalamencephalon. The thread-
like stalk is attached to the upper vesicle, and corresponds to
the proximal and median part of the epiphysis of Selachians
and Amphibians (and we may now add to the stalk connecting
the “eye” with the dorsal surface of the thalamencephalon of
Lacertilia).
The distal portion of the epiphysis consists of two vesicles, of
which the upper is the larger ; their cavities, save in rare cases,
do not communicate with each other. Ahlborn describes the
upper vesicle as being a delicate hollow structure, flattened
out dorso-ventrally, and placed close to the skeletogenous roof
of the cranial cavity. The cells of the lower wall are always
much thicker and deeper than those of the upper, and in his
figures (Taf. xvi, figs. 44, 46, and 47), though he does not
describe them minutely, are seen to have their long rod-like
ends free from nuclei, and turned towards the cavity, whilst the
nuclei are all placed close to their external extremities. These
rod-like structures, however, are quite devoid of pigment, and,
moreover, have a thin but well-marked layer of nervous matter
present between them and the cavity of the vesicle, which is
itself apparently occupied by strands of nervous tissue passing
from the posterior to the thin anterior wall. There is nothing
comparable to a lens.
The under vesicle is attached on its ventral surface to the
left ganglion habenule (the whole organ is placed asymmetri-
cally, and lies on the left side), whilst its upper wall is fused
with the larger upper vesicle. This secondary fusion with
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 171
the brain roof necessitating the closure of the epiphysis within
the cranial cavity.
Ahlborn!? has also, in a separate article, discussed the nature
of the pineal gland. He does not agree with Van Wijhe, who,
following Goette’s work on Amphibia, had regarded the pineal
gland as “ Ein Umbildungsprodukt einer letzten Verbindungs
des Hirns mit der Oberhaut” (a mistake corrected later by
Van Wijhe (see infra). He agrees, on the other hand, with
Balfour,? who stated that the epiphysis arose as an outgrowth
from the dorsal surface of the thalamencephalon, and says,
himself: ‘ Das Neuralrohr is relativ lange vor dem Auftreten
der ersten epiphysenanlage vollstandig geschlossen, der Porus
ist nicht mehr vorhanden.” He states, further, that the cavity
of the primitive pineal gland is a new structure formed as an
outgrowth of the neural canal, and “ ist also nicht ein Rest der
vorderen Verschlusséffnung des Gehirns ;” hence it cannot be
compared with the anterior neuropore of Ascidians and Am-
phioxus ; but he says: “‘ Durch den Vergleich der Epiphysis
cerebri mit einer primitiven Augenblase glaube ich nun eine
Reihe sehr gewichtiger Griinde fiir eine neue und wie es scheint
richtige Deutung der Zirbeldriise gefunden zu haben.” He
then draws attention to the fact that both the pineal gland
and the optic vesicles agree in origin as hollow outgrowths, the
only difference between the two being that the optic vesicles
are large and laterally placed, whilst the pineal vesicle is small,
dorsal, and median. After giving in detail other reasons, he
says, Alles zusammengenommen komme ich nun aus folgenden
griinden :
(1) Nach mit dem Augenblasen tibereinstimmenden Ent-
stehung der Epiphysis durch eine hohle Austilpung der
Hirnwand ;
(2) nach dem Ursprung und der Verkntipfung der Epiphysis
mit der optischen Hirnregion, speciell mit dem Thalamus
opticus ;
1 “ Ueber die Bedeutung der Zirbeldriise,” ‘ Zeit. f. Wiss.,’ 1884, Bd. xl,
p. 331.
2 «Klasm. Fishes,’ p. 177.
VOL. XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER. N
172 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
(3) nach der morphologischen Aehnlichkeit des Organs mit
einer primitiven Augenblase (Blischen und Stiel) ;
(4) nach der angenahert peripherischen Lage des Blaschens
bei den Selachiern, Ganoiden und Petromyzonten und nach
einer volkommen peripherischen Lage bei den Amphibien
(ausserhalb des Schidels auf gleicher hohe mit den Augen ;
(5) nach dem ursprunglichen zusammenhang der Epiphysis
mit der Nervenleiste (van Wijhe); zu der Vermuthung, das
die glandula pinealis als das Rudiment einer un-
paaren Augenanlage anzusehen ist. Wenn dieser
Schluss richtig ist, so besitzt die Epiphysis als Rudimentares
Stirnauge, wie mir scheint, noch jetzt ein funktionirendes
Analogon in dem unpaaren Auge der Tunicaten und vielleicht
auch des Amphioxus.”
Van Wijhe, dealing with the development of Selachians,
stated first that the anterior neuropore (the spot at which the
brain remained last in connection with the epidermis during
closure of the neural canal) corresponded to the pineal gland
as was stated by Goette to hold true for Amphibia. In his
more recent paper,’ wherein he describes the results arrived at
by working with duck embryos, he corrects his first mistake,
and states that in birds, though the neuropore exists till the
stage with twenty-eight somites, it then completely disappears,
whilst when twenty-nine somites are present, the earliest
rudiment of the epiphysis appears.
Hoffmann? states that in representatives of nearly all classes
of Vertebrates it has been proved that the epiphysis arises as
an evagination of the roof of the thalamencephalon, and figures
its earliest stages in various reptilian embryos (Tropidona-
tus natrix and Lacerta); showing also that it is perfectly
distinct from, though present at the same time as, the anterior
neuropore. The latter, he says, indicates the position where the
“ Vorderhirn ” joins the “ Zwichenhirn”’ whilst the epiphysial
1 “Ueber den vorderen Neuroporus und die phylogenetische Function des
Canalis Neurentericus der Wirbelthiere,” ‘ Zool. Anzeig.,’ 1884, p. 683.
2 « Weitere Untersuchungen zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Reptilien,’
‘Morph. Jahr.,’ Bd. xi, 1885, p. 192,
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 173
rudiment is situated where the “ Zwichenhirn” and the “ Mittel-
hirn” unite. He states further: ‘‘ Die vordere Ausbruch-
tung der Epiphysis schnirt sich volstandinge von den Hirndach
ab; sie bildet eine kleine, runde, selbstandige Blase von platt-
gedruckter Form und stellt die Anlage des sogenannten Ley-
digschen Organes/von Strahl hat dieses zuerst erkannt und
ich kann seinen Befund bestatigen.”
The most recent, as well as most interesting work upon the
pineal gland is that of de Graaf,’ to whom is certainly due the
merit of having first clearly shown that in one particular
animal (Anguis fragilis) the pineal gland actually is
modified into a structure comparable to an Inverte-
brate eye. He says: “Dem zufolge gleicht bei Anguis
fragilis das ganze abgeschnirte Stiick etwa dem Auge eines
hoher entwickelten wirbellosen Thieres, wie uns z. B. Cephalo-
poden, Pteropoden und Heteropoden bekannt ist.”
According to de Graaf the Epiphysis, in Amphibia and
Reptiles (Lacertilia), arises as a hollow outgrowth of the
thalamencephalon,”? never passing much beyond this stage in
Urodeles (Pl. 2, figs. 13—18), but in Anura and Lacertilia
becoming divided into two parts. In the former, growth
results in the formation of a distal bladder-shaped portion and
a solid stalk connecting this with the brain-roof (Pl. 2, figs.
22—29) ; the distal part is gradually constricted off from the
stalk and comes to lie excerebrally and finally without the
cranium and close beneath the skin; the stalk, on the other
hand, lies permanently within the brain membranes and thus
enclosed in the skull cavity.
In the adult, he says, the cut-off portion of the epiphysis
(‘ Stieda’s gland”) lies embedded in the cutis close beneath
the epidermis, is surrounded by a specially close-woven case,
1 (a) “Zur Anatomie und Entwickelung der Epiphyse bei Amphibien
und Reptilien,” ‘ Zool. Anzeig.,’ 29th March, 1886. (4) ‘ Bijdrage tot de
kennis van den bouw en de ontwickkeling der epiphyse bij Amphibién en
Reptilién,’ van Henri W. de Graaf, Leiden, 1886.
2 He thus differs from Goette in regarding the epiphysis as a secondary
outgrowth, having nothing to do with the neuropore.
174 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
‘ and shows retrogressive metamorphosis, undergoing fatty
degeneration. What Goette regarded as the epiphysial stalk
is, according to Graaf, nothing more than a branch of the
Ramus supra-maxillaris of the fifth nerve, and always
terminates in the connective-tissue case, never in the organ
itself. The extra-cranial part, though present in the adult
Rana esculenta, R. temporaria, Alytes obstetricans,
Bombinator ingens, and Bufo cinerea, is completely
wanting in the full-grown Hyla arborea. In Reptilia the
development of the epiphysis takes place as in Amphibia, the
distal portion being, according to de Graaf, completely
cut off from the proximal stalk; it lies between the
brain membranes and has the form of a small, roundish, more
or less flattened out vesicle, and shows cellular structure. The
wall lying in contact with the parietal foramen is thickened and
lens shaped, whilst the hinder wall is pigmented on its inner side.
De Graaf describes in some detail and figures (Pl. 4, figs.
32—34) the organ in Anguis fragilis. Reference to this
description will be made later on.
Results of the present investigation.
I desire in the first place to acknowledge the kindness of
Dr. Ginther, to whom I am indebted for the gift of examples
of different genera (indicated by an asterisk in the list below)
from the duplicate specimens of the British Museum; my
thanks are also due to Professor Stewart for the opportunity
of examining specimens of Iguana and Varanus from the.
collection of the Royal College of Surgeons.
To E. B. Poulton, Esq., of Keble College, and to F. Beddard,
Esq., of the Zoological Society, I am indebted for specimens of
Hatteria.
My thanks also are due to Professor Westwood for the gift
of a fine Chameleo vulgaris, and for the opportunity of
examining C. bifurcatus; and to G. C. Bourne, Esq., of New
College, for a specimen of Gecko mauritanicus.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 175
I have also to acknowledge gratefully the gift of various
species of Lacertilia, prepared especially and sent to me from
the Bahamas by J. Gardiner, Esq.; they arrived too late for
the results of their examination to be included in the present
article, but I hope to be able to publish an account of the
structure of the organ in these forms in a short time.
The forms investigated have been the following :
‘Hatteria punctata. Lyriocephalus scutatus.
‘“*Varanus giganteus. **Calotes versicola.
me bengalensis. ae ophiomaca.
-Monitor (sp. ?). -*Agama hispida.
- Ameiva corvina. & *Stellio cordylina.
»-Chameleo vulgaris. * *Grammatophora barbata.
* s bifurcatus. <~*Moloch horridus.
-Gecko verus. Leiodera nitida.
» Mauritanicus. x Anguis fragilis.
~-Anolis (various species). « Cyclodus gigas.
Leiolemus tenuis. » Lacerta ocellata.
*Uraniscodon (Plica) umbra. 4 viridis.
**Iguana tuberculata. 3 (Zootoca) vivipara.
«* Draco volans. ««Seps chalcidica.
-*Ceratophora aspera.
The material has, in the great majority of cases, consisted of
spirit specimens in a better or worse state of preservation so
far as histological structure was concerned, so that in many
instances it has been impossible to do much more than ascer-
tain the presence or absence of the organ, its connection or
separation from the proximal part of the epiphysis, and perhaps
a few details with regard to its histological structure. Even in
‘fresh specimens the organ lies so deeply embedded in connec-
tive tissue and so closely shut in by bone, which must be
removed along with it to prevent injury to the structure, that
there is great difficulty in rapidly reaching it with reagents.
Of two of the most important forms—Hatteria punctata
and Varanus giganteus—I have had the great advantage,
through Professor Moseley’s kindness, of examining fresh
specimens, and have thus been able to investigate more care-
fully the structure of the retina.
176 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
In the account which follows the structure of the organ is
described separately in the different forms examined; this
structure, as might have been expected to be the case in an
organ of this kind (which must be regarded as in a more or
less rudimentary condition), shows considerable variation, even
amongst species of the same genus. I hope on a future occa-
sion to describe the organ in other forms of Lacertilia.
Hatteria punctata, Pl. XIV, figs. 2, 3,4, and 5; Pl. XV,
figs. 7 and 8; Pl X Xo as. 7:
(1) External Appearance.—There is in Hatteria but
very little external trace of the eye, no special scale being
modified into a “ cornea ;” an absence of pigment, however, in
the skin of the median line, slightly posterior to the level of the
paired eyes, indicates the position of the parietal foramen ; this
external indication being more evident in some than in others.
(2) Position of the Eye.—The foramen itself is filled
up by a plug of connective tissue, which, notwithstanding the
absence of pigment, must effectually prevent the organ lying
beneath from functioning as an eye in the ordinary sense of
the word; light would more easily penetrate the skin at this
than at any other portion of the surface of the head, but yet it
is perfectly impossible for an image to be formed upon the
retina. The fibres of the connective tissue in the foramen
may be divided into two sets—(1) an outer set (Pl. XV, fig. 7,
Cf) arranged on the whole at right angles to the surface of
the head, and which on the inner side of the foramen are con-
nected with (2) an inner set lying immediately in front of the
eye, and arranged so as practically to form a hemisphere, part
of the internal surface of which forms the anterior boundary of
a capsule enclosing the eye (figs. 2, 7, and 8, Ci). The
hinder half of the capsule which thus lies in the lower part of
the foramen is formed of somewhat loosely aggregated fibres
with well-marked nuclei scattered irregularly amongst them,
and is drawn out in the direction of the optic stalk, which,
together with a blood-vessel, pierces the capsule wall at its
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 177
most posterior point (fig. 2); the extreme length of the cap-
sule is 1*4 mm. Special fibres cross from the capsule wall to
the edge of the lens, and, being connected with the tissue
immediately surrounding the retina, may serve the purpose of
keeping the eye in position, and thus represent the rudiment
of a structure of importance when the eye was fully func-
tional. The capsule in its hinder part contains much irre-
gularly scattered connective tissue with nuclei, its anterior
part, however, being free from them. Within the capsule
breaks up an artery (figs. 2 and 7, B.v.) whose branches ramify
-amongst the fibres behind the eye; this special blood supply
is a prominent feature in connection with the organ in all the
forms examined.
The eye lies with its long axis directed upwards and for-
wards in the most anterior part of the capsule; figs. 7 and 8
show the relative position of the eye in its capsule with regard
to the brain and the parietal foramen.
Structure of the Eye.—Through the kindness of Prof.
Moseley I have been able to examine the structure in a fresh
specimen, and, notwithstanding. the fact that the organ cannot
now be fully functional, the retina is fairly well developed.
The eye has, roughly speaking, the shape in section (PI.
XIV, fig. 2) of a cone, the base of which lies turned towards
the surface, whilst the pineal stalk is connected with the apex.
The walls of the optic vesicle are divided into two parts, (1)
an anterior; (2) a posterior; of which the former forms the
lens, and the latter the sensitive structures.
(1) Lens.—The lens of the pineal thus differs markedly
from that of the paired eyes, where it originates as a secondary
structure by invagination of the epiblast, whilst in the former
it is apparently directly the product of the brain wall itself,
and equivalent in position to that part of the paired optic
vesicles which after invagination forms the retinal elements.
De Graaf has likened the eye to that of such Invertebrates
as Cephalopods and Pteropods ; but, apart from other differ-
ences which exist between the two in regard to both develop-
ment and structure, the lens is not in the least degree com-
178 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
parable in the two cases, being in the Invertebrates mentioned
formed as a cuticular secretion.
In Hatteria as in all forms examined it is distinctly cellular,
the nuclei being prominent and numerous (fig. 2). The
median cells are elongate so as to give the lens a curious cone
shape, the base corresponding to the front of the eye and the
apex lying in the optic axis; the cells are further arranged in
a definite manner as shown in fig. 2, and are, as the latter
indicates, directly continuous with those of the retina.
(2) Retina.— The retinal elements are arranged in the
manner typical of Invertebrates, i.e. the rods lie on the inner
side bounding the cavity of the optic vesicle, the nerve enter-
ing posteriorly and not spreading out in front of the rods.
Within the same vertebrate animal we thus find
eyes developed on both vertebrate and invertebrate
types, both being also formed fromthe modification
of the walls of hollow outgrowths of the brain.
The retina consists of the following elements (Pl. XIV, figs.
2, 3, 4, and 5):
(1) A layer of rod-like bodies (R) enveloped in deep pig-
ment, which when the rods are separated (fig. 5) is seen to be
so deposited upon them as to produce a striated appearance.
The pigment is specially densely deposited around the margin
of the retina in contact with the lens, extending here through
the whole thickness of the wall. A curious specialisation
takes place in connection with the rods lying in the optic axis,
which also obtains in the pineal eye of many other forms.
The rods in this portion are elongated (R') to at least twice the
length of the ordinary ones, and are in connection at their
outer ends with a special group of nucleated cells (n*) which
lie enclosed by a somewhat definite membrane in the pineal
stalk, with the fibres of which they are directly connected
(fig. 4).
(2) A double and, in parts, triple row of spherical nucleated
elements (n!), which appear to be connected by processes, on
the one hand with the rods, and on the other with the layers
external tothem. They surround posteriorly the elongate rods,
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 179
and their processes in this region run in many cases (n*)
directly into connection with the fibres of the optic stalk.
The layer gradually thins out anteriorly until that part is
reached where, in the neighbourhood of the lens, the pigment
is present through the whole breadth of the wall. In its
thickest part the whole layer (consisting of the double or triple
row of elements) is about the same breadth as the layer of
rods.
(3) External to the spherical elements lies a thin layer con-
sisting of a fine punctated material, which takes the stain
(heematoxylin) with difficulty but contains numerous scattered
fine pigment granules. Into this, which may be called the
Molecular layer,' pass processes from the retinal elements
on either side (fig. 2, mo.). The layer in question is a very
thin one in Hatteria punctata, but forms, when seen in
section (fig. 2), a definite boundary line separating the retinal
elements into an internal and an external division. Poste-
riorly the layer spreads out and surrounds the specially
elongated rods in the optic axis, anteriorly it reaches as far
forwards as the ring of pigment surrounding the lens. It is
possible that this layer and many of the processes passing into
it may be of the nature of supporting structures.
(4) A layer of nucleated spherical elements (fig. 3, n”) lying
close to the molecular layer, and distinguished from those on
the inner side by their greater size; they are arranged so as to
alternate (the alternate arrangement is, however, by no means
perfectly constant) with ‘
(5) A layer of cone-shaped bodies (Co.) in which no nuclei
can be detected. They lie with their broad ends externally,
and gradually taper internally till their pointed ends are
closely in contact with the molecular layer into which pro-
cessses from them run (fig. 3).
(6) Between the bases of the above are a series of spindle-
shaped elements with nuclei, from which processes pass off
internally, which may either run directly into the molecular
layer or into the spherical bodies on its external side. At the
' Cf. de Graaf, Pl. 4, fig. 34, g/.
180 W. BALDWIN SPENOER.
posterior part (i.e. near the pineal stalk) the cone-shaped
elements seem to be absent, and their place to be taken by
large nucleated spindles (Co), which, as it were, bend round
internally (fig. 5) and give off processes running directly into
the fibres of the stalk.
Connection with the Brain.—It has hitherto been
stated by all writers that the distal part of the epiphysis
becomes separated from the proximal which forms the pineal
gland of the adult, and that the former comes to lie (as shown
by de Graaf in Anguis fragilis) external to the cranial cavity
in the parietal foramen. De Graaf! figures in Anguis the
eye as fitted closely into the parietal foramen encased by con-
nective tissue, but separated by a considerable interval from
the proximal hollow epiphysial stalk from which in develop-
ment it has been cut off.
In Hatteria, as also in several other forms to be
described below, longitudinal vertical sections show
clearly that the highly developed eye is connected
with the epiphysis by a solid and well-marked stalk,
which may be called the pineal stalk.
This runs in the median line backwards and slightly down-
wards ; it enters the eye at the posterior end, the walls of the
optic vesicle being here (fig. 2) drawn out somewhat back-
wards. The relationship of the elongated rods to the stalk
has been already described ; passing backwards from the eye
the stalk makes a decided bend upwards, then pierces the wall
of the eye capsule at its most posterior point and runs straight
back to the epiphysis; its fibres enter the latter, being appa-
rently connected with the cells of the apex and the under
surface. The pineal stalk contains elements which have much
the appearance of those found at an early stage in the deve-
loping nerve of the paired eyes, that is, they much resemble
cells which are undergoing a process of elongation so as to
form long fibres (figs. 2 and 4); some having undergone
considerable elongation, others being yet spindle shaped.
There can be little doubt that this median, azygos, nerve
1 Pl. 4, figs. 31, 32, 33, and 34.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 181
represents the originally hollow process uniting the proximal
with the distal portion of the epiphysis, and which, losing its
connection with the optic vesicle in some forms (e.g. Anguis),
is in others (e.g. Hatteria) transformed into a solid stalk
serving as the nerve of the pineal eye. It has been sufficiently
‘demonstrated that the latter is the distal portion of the epi-
physis, and we are thus presented with a new sensory structure
—the pineal eye—agreeing precisely with the paired eyes in
(1) its development as an outgrowth from the walls of the neural
canal, and (2) the formation of its nerve by the gradual solidifi-
cation of the primitively hollow tube connecting the distal
vesicle with the proximal portion of the outgrowth. In the
case of the paired eyes the whole of the outgrowth save the
vesicle is transformed into a nerve; in the pineal eye only the
median part of the outgrowth is thus metamorphosed, the
proximal part retaining its originally hollow nature.
VWaranus cicantews, Pl XPV fie 1) figs Ger PEK;
fig. 10; Pl. XIX, fig. 34.
External Appearance.—In a large specimen of this
animal, measuring six feet one inch from the snout to the tip
of the tail, which I was enabled to examine in the fresh state
through Professor Moseley’s kindness, the external indication
of the eye is so clear that it is remarkable that no one has
hitherto examined the organ lying beneath. The head is
covered with small, deeply-pigmented tubercle-like scales, save
in the median line, where, somewhat posterior to the paired
eyes, a single large scale is present, standing out prominently
by reason of its creamy whiteness (fig. 10).
The scale is roughly hexagonal in shape, measuring 5 mm.
across, and has upon it a slightly-raised circular rim, the area
within which has the appearance of a transparent membrane
drawn tensely over a cavity beneath. A dark circular spot in
the middle, visible in the living animal, indicates the position
of the eye, and is, as will subsequently be shown, due to the
presence of a mass of pigment in the lens. In the matter of
182 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
external indication of the structure Varanus thus differs
much from Hatteria in the possession of this scale, modified
to form a cornea.
Position of the Eye.—The cornea thus formed lies imme-
mediately above the parietal foramen, the space in which is
tightly filled by connective tissue, in the midst of which again
lies the pineal eye. There is thus no real cavity beneath the
cornea, but the pigment, which elsewhere is abundantly present
in the skin, is here entirely absent, so that by this means the
passage of light to the organ is much facilitated. Beneath the
epidermis and the rete mucosum the connective-tissue fibres
of the cutis vera are arranged in two definite sets, as in
Hatteria: (1) a series running parallel to the anterior surface
of the eye from side to side of the foramen (PI. XIV, fig. 1,
Ct”), interlacing with each other, and thus forming a dome-
shaped structure above the eye; and (2) a series of bundles
(Ct) at right angles to the former, upon which they spread out
at their internal ends, whilst externally they run outwards
to the rete mucosum. Obliquely directed strands pass from
one bundle to another, and the irregular spaces thus left are
filled up by a meshwork of indefinitely arranged fibres.
Immediately below the level of the first series of fibres is
placed the eye itself, but, instead of lying, as in Hatteria, ina
capsule, the connective tissue closely invests it. The tissue
within the parietal foramen may be divided into three parts:
(1) a series (Ct*) bounding the sides of the parietal foramen,
and continuous with the upper series (C7¢'); these follow in their
course the outline of the bone; (2) irregularly arranged fibres
(Cz*), filling up the greater part of the foramen; (8) a series
forming a special encasement for the eye, to the sides of which
their long axes are parallel (C¢*, the arrangement of these is
scarcely made sufficiently prominent in the figure).
In Hatteria is found a special capsule in the space within
which the eye is situate. Even in this form a certain amount
of connective tissue les within the capsule, whilst a still greater
development of the tissue would lead to the condition which
obtains in Varanus giganteus.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 183
In addition: to the connective tissue within the foramen a
large blood-vessel is present, which, accompanying the optic
stalk till the foramen is reached, breaks up in this into nume-
rous branches ramifying in the connective tissue (B.v.), a branch
finally passing from either side in front of the eye (fig. 1),
whilst one pierces the connective-tissue dome.
Structure of the Hye.—The eye is, though the size of
the two specimens of Hatteria and Varanus are so dif-
ferent (Hatteria under 2 ft., Varanus 6 ft.), as nearly as
possible precisely the same size in both, measuring, in the
line of the optic axis, °4 mm., but in Varanus the eye is
compressed somewhat in this direction, so that it is broader
from side to side slightly than in Hatteria (cf. figs. 1 and 2).
Lens.—The lens is distinctly cellular in structure, the cells
being elongated in the direction of the optic axis, and having
the appearance of stretching the whole breadth of the lens,
their nuclei, which are very prominent, being situated so that
in section (fig. 1) they form a well-marked line across the lens
from side to side somewhat nearer to the inner than the outer
surface. The whole lens has the appearance represented in
fig. 1, being thickest in the median line and thinning away
rapidly at each side where it joins the retina.
Right in its very middle is present a large, more or less
globular mass of small spherical cells, deeply pigmented (fig. 1,
pig.), and lying directly in the optic axis. The presence of these
must of necessity interfere with the action of the organ as an
eye, in fact, the whole structure is characterised by the presence
of a great amount of pigment deposited in every part. It is
this pigment in the lens which causes the eye seen through the
transparent cornea to appear like a black spot, and its presence,
which must be regarded as due to degeneracy in the tissues,
indicates that the organ is now in a rudimentary condition.
Structure of Retina.—The rods line the cavity of the
vesicle and form a very definite layer, being deeply embedded
in pigment, which renders it difficult to distinguish their out-
lines. Processes pass from them, often accompanied by pig-
ment granules, into the external-lying layers. Asin Hatteria
184 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
certain of the rods become elongated ; this lengthening is con
fined in the former to those lying in the optic axis;but in
Varanus takes place at two points, one of which, the most
prominent, lies in the optic axis, whilst the other lies to the
anterior side, each being connected with the entrance of a
separate nervous strand into the eye.
Amongst the rods are scattered numerous spherical masses
of pigment. There is not the slightest indication of any struc-
tures lying internal to the rods embedded in pigment, such as
are described by de Graaf in Anguis; on the other hand, the
internal limit of the layer of rods is so well marked as to
present the appearance of a definite membrane lining the
cavity. The latter was most probably filled during life by a
fluid, the coagulated remains of which are seen attached as an
irregular structureless coagulum to the inner ends of the rods.
External to the rods is a layer of finely punctated material
(Mo) apparently corresponding to the much narrower layer in
Hatteria. This layer, together with the rods, occupies as
nearly as possible one half of the breadth of the retina. In
this layer are situated spherical elements (n!), which in some
cases can be traced into connection with the rods; no arrange-
ment in two or more rows, asin Hatteria, can be detected,
but they appear to be placed somewhat irregularly. External
to the molecular layer, the outer limit of which is somewhat
sharply defined, lie a series of spherical-shaped elements (n2).
The appearance of these as seen in section is given in fig. 6.
Some of the elements resemble those lying within the mole-
cular layer (n'), others have processes passing straight through
to the rods on the internal and the nerve-fibres on the external
side, whilst others again are connected with one another and
with the layers on either side by irregularly branching pro-
cesses.
Certain of the nerve-fibres pass round behind the vesicle
and then enter the retinal elements, but apparently the greater
number are directly connected with the two above-described
bundles of elongated rods.
Within the external layers of the retina are many large
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 185
spherical masses of deep brown pigment (pzg.'), connected in
some cases with the pigment enclosing the rods ; beyond this,
again, a certain amount of pigment in minute granules is
scattered irregularly amongst the external spherical elements,
and completely external to the optic vesicle posteriorly is
massed around the entrance of the nerve a great amount of
pigment deposited in branchial cells (pig.’).
Nerve.—The pineal stalk is well marked in Varanus
giganteus and differs moreover from anything met with
amongst other forms (even other genera of Varanus).'
Instead of being single there are three distinct nervous strands
entering the vesicle posteriorly ; two of these are more promi-
nent than the third, which appears to be in connection with
the anterior of the former; the single posteriorly placed nerve
entering very nearly but not quite in the line of the optic
axis. The larger and smaller anterior strands join together,
and then, after a marked curve, shared in by the posterior
one, they join the latter and run back as the solid pineal stalk
to the proximal part of the epiphysis.
At first it seemed possible that the appearance described
might be due to the cutting im longitudinal section of the walls
of a hollow stalk distorted somewhat by reagents, but an
examination of a continuous series soon showed that this was
not the case, and that the pineal stalk, single proxi-
mally, broke up distally into two, and finally into
three separate nerves entering the optic vesicle.
The most noticeable features in the eye of Varanus are:
(1) The great development of pigment in all parts, and
more especially in the lens.
(2) The curious nature of the retina, which has really the
form of a cellular network ; the cells being in connection with
one another by branched processes, the nuclei being scattered
somewhat irregularly and giving rise, together with the proto-
plasm around them, to the spherical elements of the retina.
‘ The only other lizard as yet examined, in which anything comparable to
this is found, is Lacerta ocellata, to be described Jater on.
186 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. ‘
Reference to this structure of the retina will be made again
when dealing with the epiphysis in Cyclodus.
(3) The triple nature of the pineal stalk.
Varanus bengalensis, Pl. XV, fig. 12; Pl. XVI, fig. 17;
Pl. XIX, figs. 37 and 41.
External Indication.—In the several specimens of V ara-
nus examined (in addition to V. giganteus) the external in-
dication of the eye was very clear indeed, consisting of a large,
modified, median scale (Pl. XIX, fig. 37), lying somewhat
posterior to the level of the paired eyes, and having at its
centre a circular dark space, surrounded at a short distance by
a dark circular line. The central part, which is to a certain
extent transparent, acts as a cornea for the eye placed beneath.
Position of the Eye.—In small specimens of Varanus,
when the skin is removed from the head, the pineal eye is
removed with it and may be examined whole. Fig. 12 repre-
sents a portion of the skull roof of a very young specimen of
V. bengalensis viewed from the under surface, the bone
being very thin indeed. The portion surrounding the parietal
foramen is represented in the figure, together with the pineal
eye, lying in the latter and viewed as a solid object. The
foramen has a somewhat oval shape and backwards from it
leads a groove in the median line. The specimen from which
this is taken was not in good histological preservation, and no
connection with the brain can be traced. The eye is circular
in outline and depressed from above downwards, and shows,
when viewed by transmitted light, the rods embedded in pig-
ment and forming a very definite layer. Since they line a
space within the vesicle, circular in outline, those at the sides,
when the object is viewed from above or below, form a circle (R),
external to which lie the other elements of the retina. In the
optic axis posteriorly lies a prominent mass of rods more deeply
pigmented than elsewhere, and which indicate most probably a
series of elongated rods connected with the union of the pineal
stalk; the latter may have been pulled away along with the
PINEAL BYE IN LACERTILIA. 187
‘
brain membranes when the surface of the skull was removed
from above the brain.
The connective tissue lying external to the eye is quite
transparent, and being placed as it is immediately beneath the
skin, the entrance of light is thus made possible ; in fact, it is
impossible to prevent the light from entering, not only in this
but in the case of the pineal eyes of all other Lacertilia, when
they are placed so near to the skin.
In section, the eye of a somewhat larger V. bengalensis
shows the following structure differing much from that of
V. gigauteus, a difference the more noticeable since it exists
between members of the same genus.
Fig. 41 represents a longitudinal section along the median
line of the head passing through the parietal foramen; the
results are represented somewhat diagrammatically. The eye
hes within the foramen tightly enclosed again within connec-
tive tissue, no special capsule being present. A very notice-
able feature is the entire absence of pigment above the eye,
though this is present in abundance in the skin elsewhere
(Ct, pig.) in the connective tissue of the cutis vera. The eye
itself is depressed dorso-ventrally, so that but comparatively
little space remains within the vesicle; the latter lies directly
above the anterior extremity of the proximal part of the
epiphysis, which runs right up into the foramen from the dorsal
wall of the thalamencephalon lying some distance posteriorly.
Fig. 17 gives a more detailed representation of the foramen
with its contents. Beneath the cuticle (cu.) the epidermis is
seen (ep.), then the rete mucosum, the nucleated cells of which
are in this part somewhat longer than those elsewhere ; beneath
this lies the connective tissue of the cutis vera (Ct). On either
side of the foramen are numerous pigment cells (Ct¢, pzg.), and the
fibres as before may be divided into two series—(1) a set running
at right angles to the long axis of the head, and (2) others form-
ing a roof for the foramen, and connected with those lying within
the latter, which form a close investment for the eye (C?*).
Within the foramenalso isamuch branched blood-vessel which
enters along with the epiphysial stalk; a small branch passes for-
VOL, XXVII, RART 2,—NEW SER, 0
188 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
ward on either side in front of the eye just asin V. giganteus.
The figure shows the specialisation in the connective tissue above
the eye, and the entire absence of pigment-bearing cells in the
same position, though they are present on both sides in the section.
Lens.—The lens has very much the same structure as in V.
giganteus, being distinctly cellular with well-marked nuclei,
forming in section a double or triple row from side to side, the
cells appearing to run the whole breadth, whilst in the middle of
the lens a great mass of pigment is deposited in the line of the
optic axis. The pigment masses are spherical on the external,
and more rod-like on the internal surface.
Structure of Retina.—The specimen being preserved in
spirits without special reference to histological work, it was
somewhat difficult to make out many points with regard to the
structure of the retina. The rods are well developed and pro-
minent, lining the cavity of the vesicle, and having their long
axes arranged as indicated in the figure, those in the optic axis
being at right angles to the external surface, the eye itself being
immovably fixed, so as to look directly upwards. They are em-
bedded in pigment, and none amongst them appear to be specially
elongated (associated, doubtless, with the absence of connection
with any nerve, suchasis present in V. giganteus or Hatteria).
No trace of any definite structure internal to the rods can be seen.
External to the rods lie a series of spherical-shaped elements
(n'), corresponding, presumably, to the same in Hatteria and
V. giganteus, and at intervals amongst these can be detected
spindle-shaped bodies, which, together with the former, stain
easily (with hematoxylin and borax-carmine). Both these he
within a layer, consisting, as in V. giganteus, of finely-punc-
tated material, whose external limit is well defined. It is difficult
to ascertain precisely the structure of this particular layer, which
in these two (as well as in other forms) has the appearance of a
ground substance, in which lie the external ends of the rods and
the spherical elements, but its constant presence and character
renders it unlikely that it is the result simply of reagents ; it is
here called the molecular layer, but may, perhaps, differ in nature
from the layer to which the same name is applied in Hatteria,
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 189
External to this lies a series of cone-shaped bodies (Co.), the
pointed internal ends of which abut against the molecular layer,
their broader external extremities being placed against the
limiting membrane of the eye, where a certain amount of
pigment (pig.') is deposited in the form of fine granules.
In some cases a connection (not well drawn in the figure) can be
traced between the cones and the rods, or, in other cases, the spheri-
cal elements. This connection is best developed in the optic axis.
Epiphysis.—In a preliminary communication to the Royal
Society! the eye of one specimen of V. bengalensis was de-
scribed as connected with the brain by a hollow epiphysial
stalk. Further investigations have shown that this statement
must be modified. It is by no means easy to determine the
point, and possibly with a fresh specimen a connection between
the eye and the proximal portion of the epiphysis may be shown |
to exist. The two come very close together (closer than is
represented in fig. 17), and there is a decided appearance of a
connection between them. Further study of my sections has
failed to establish the poimt, and fig. 17 represents, as far as
can at present be ascertained, the actual state.
The epiphysis (fig. 41) may be divided into three parts: (1)
the distal, separated off as the pineal eye; (2) a short, hollow,
proximal portion, arising from the roof of the thalamencephalon,
and running at right angles to this; and (3) a median portion
running forward from the end of the latter along the roof of
the cranial cavity enclosed in the brain membranes. This part
also is hollow, and its walls consist of a single layer of distinctly
nucleated columnar cells. Its distal extremity lies immediately
beneath the pineal eye, and is swollen out and filled with blood-
corpuscles, the cells in the wall of this part being somewhat
cubical in shape. Passing backward the walls approach one
another until they come into contact, and for a short distance
a solid stalk is formed; further back, again, the walls part
from each other, and in this region the cells lengthen out very
much until they pass into the proximal part (fig. 41).
1 «Proc. R.8.,’ ‘* Preliminary Communication on the Structure and Pre-
sence in Sphenodon and other Lizards of the Median Eye, described by de
Graaf in Anguis fragilis,” June 10th, 1886.
190 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
Monitor (sp. ?).—In the Monitor examined there was no
external trace of the organ to be discerned, though when the
skin was removed from the dorsal surface of the head and
viewed by transmitted light, an absence of pigment and
general transparency in the spot overlying the parietal foramen
indicated the position of the eye. The latter could be easily
distinguished as a small black spot lying within the foramen,
which was itself. in the form examined, extremely small.
Unfortunately the specimen was in a bad state of preservation
histologically, and the tissues very dry, so that it was again
impossible to make out the details of the structure. The
eye, which is deeply pigmented save anteriorly, where is the
lens, appears to be placed at the distal extremity of a pineal
stalk which, as in Varanus giganteus, runs up vertically
through the foramen, accompanied as usual by a large artery.
Chameleo vulgaris, Pl. XVI, fig. 21; Pl. XIX, fig. 40 ;
Pl. XX, fig. 6.
In this form a curious modification takes place, an optic
vesicle being formed but not reaching any high degree of
development. In the short account written in ‘ Nature,’! it
was stated in a note that the organ was present in Chameleo
vulgaris—a statement of which de Graaf has subsequently
denied the truth. He says that though the parietal foramen
is open in the young form it becomes closed as the adult state
is reached, and that there can be thus no organ remaining in
connection with the proximal part of the epiphysis. Before
reading his note, and subsequently to the publication in
‘Nature,’ three more adult specimens were cut in section
(the first note was based upon a dissection), with the result
that each one has fully confirmed the statement that the organ
is present in Chameleo, and moreover remains in connection
with the proximal part of the epiphysis, though it certainly is
in a comparatively low state of development.
External Indication.—The presence of the organ is
indicated in both Chameleo vulgaris and Chameleo
1 ©Nature,’ May 13th, 1886.
PINEAL BYE IN LACERTILIA. 191
bifurcatus by a tubercle slightly depressed below the level
of the surrounding ones, and having a very transparent appear-
ance ;! it lies in the median line just in front of the anterior
end of the strongly marked ridge, which occupies the dorsal
surface of the head posteriorly.
Fig. 40 gives a diagrammatic view of the relationship of the
different parts; the parietal foramen is not large but is still
clearly present, and very easily distinguishable in sections.
Within it and lying immediately beneath the modified tubercle
is the optic vesicle ; elsewhere as usual the skin is deeply pig-
mented, but the pigment cells are entirely wanting above the
vesicle, a fact which is especially noticeable in sections of this
animal, the cells having long processes and being closely
packed together (fig. 21). It is this absence of pigment which
produces the transparent effect in the tubercle. The surface
of the latter is very convex, and beneath it the layers of the
skin are arranged as usual, a series of special connective-tissue
fibres forming an encasement for the vesicle. Within the
foramen there is the customary well-marked and branching
blood-vessel (6.v.), which accompanies the pineal stalk.
Structure of Vesicle-—In Chameleo the structure of
the vesicle is very simple. It has the form of a hollow sphere
whose walls have been compressed dorso-ventrally, so that its
greatest length lies in the line of the long axis of the head.
Its walls are formed of elongated distinctly nucleated cells,
those facing into the cavity bearing long cilia; no pigment is
present and there is no differentiation into lens and retina, the
cells of the anterior and posterior walls of the vesicle being
alike. Posteriorly the imner wall of the vesicle is, as it were,
drawn downwards (fig. 21), a small horn-like space being thus
formed, turned somewhat towards the pineal stalk ; its general
appearance conveys the idea of the vesicle having at first had
the relationship to the then open pineal stalk which is at
present shown by the swollen distal extremity to the epiphysial
tube in Cyclodus.. By the meeting of the walls of the epi-
physial tube the vesicle would become closed, and the solid
1 The external indication is much clearer in some than in other specimens,
192 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
pineal stalk formed; this would be attached primitively to the
posterior end, and the bending of the cells of the vesicle wall
(fig. 21) make it appear as if a subsequent drawing down of
the stalk to the ventral surface had taken place. In the
specimens examined the stalk is seen to end anteriorly some-
what sharply against the under surface of the vesicle, at any
rate, in this part none of its fibres could be traced into the
cells above, though, as the specimens examined were not
specially preserved for histological purposes, it is quite possible
that with fresh ones a connection might be demonstrated.
Posteriorly, however, where the drawing down of the wall
occurs the fibres and cells are in connection with each other.
The pineal stalk itself is avery definite structure, running from
the under surface of the vesicle downwardsand slightly backwards,
till just without the parietal foramen, where it joins the hollow
epiyhysial stalk running backward to the roof of the thalamence-
phalon. In structure it resembles closely that of Hatteria.
Gecko verus.
Neither in the adult nor in the embryo is there the slightest
external trace of the organ, the skin being tuberculated and
capable of being lifted up from the head without remaining
attached in the position of the parietal foramen. There is no
discernible trace of the latter: in lizards in which it is present
the skin cannot be removed wholly from the surface of the head.
Sections show that the epiphysis is a well-marked structure
in Platydactylus arising from the roof of the thalamence-
phalon and running straight upwards till it comes into contact
with the roof of the cranial cavity. This portion corresponds
to the proximal part of the structure in other forms, and appa-
rently the pineal stalk, which usually runs forward from this
along the dura mater, as well as the distal portion modified into
the pineal eye, are both absent in Gecko. The epiphysis is hollow
and its cavity gradually increases in size as it passes further from
the roof of the brain and approaches the skull, against which
it ends blindly ; there is no differentiation in its walls, so far as
could be discerned, to form an optic vesicle.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 193
The same structure is present in Gecko verus and Gecko
mauritanicus.
Ameiva corvina.
Ameiva externally agrees with Platydactylus in the
absence of a modified scale to function as a cornea; the skin
of the head is also easily removable, not being attached in the
position of the foramen, which is also wanting in this species.
I have not yet examined it by means of sections, but as far as
can be told it agrees with Gecko.
Anolis, Pl. XV, fig. 11; Pl. XVII, fig: 24.
It is not my intention in this paper to describe the structure
of the eye of Anolis in any great detail, as before long I hope,
by the kindness of Mr. J. Gardiner, to be enabled to describe,
by means of specimens prepared carefully by him, the eyes of
several species of Anolis from the Bahamas. The eye of one
specimen has, however, been figured viewed as a solid object
from beneath (fig. 11). The brain membranes are represented,
the dura mater having branched pigment-cells scattered over it,
and having a specially dark ring around the margin of the
parietal foramen in which lies the eye. The latter is somewhat
elliptical in shape, its long axis lying in the same line with
that of the head: the eye is compressed dorso-ventrally, and
when compared with the organin Varanus bengalensis (fig.
12), placed by its side, the rods are seen to be much larger than
in the latter ; the cavity within the optic vesicle, whose size is in-
dicated by the circular space bounded by the inner ends of the
rods, being hence considerably less in Anolis than in Varanus.
Fig. 24 (Pl. XVIT) is a drawing of the eye of another species
of Anolis from the West Indies. The organ lies in the
foramen with its upper surface close beneath the surface of
the head. Its shape is unlike that of any form described
hitherto, being elongated in a dorso-ventral direction. The
lens is cellular and its hinder border is deeply convex towards
the cavity of the vesicle, calling to mind somewhat the shape
of the structure n Hatteria; in the optic axis certain of the
194 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
cells are apparently undergoing degeneration, pigment being
deposited in them.
Retina.—The hinder wall of the vesicle forming the retina
is thinnest where it joins the lens and thickest posteriorly.
The whole is noticeable by reason of a great development of
pigment, which appears to surround all the elements. The rods
(R.) are very well marked and in some cases, especially in the
line of the optic axis, present the appearance of being striated ;
in the latter position also they are especially elongated. At
their external ends they seem to be connected with spherical
elements (n), also embedded in pigment; these are united by
means of processes, rendered evident again by pigment deposited
upon them, with a layer of elements apparently corresponding to
the cone-shaped bodies of other retinas (Co.). In its most pos-
terior region theelements seem to be inconnection with the fibres
of the optic stalk (Op. s.), which runs downwards and backwards
within the vacuolate tissue filling up the parietal foramen.
Leiolemus tenuis.
The external indication of the eye is very clear in the specimen;
the scale is in the usual position and surrounded by a series ar-
ranged in a circular manner around it as a centre, the two pos-
terior ones being larger than the other four. In the middle of the
eye-scale itself lies the circular cornea, white and dome-shaped.
Sections show that the eye is present beneath, the walls of the
vesicle being differentiated into a transparent cellular lens an-
teriorly and a retina posteriorly ; the rods are enveloped in pig-
ment, and the latter is deposited also through the whole thickness
of the retina. The whole organ had shrunk so much that it was
impossible again to do more than recognise the presence of the
structure, and the fact that it was differentiated into an eye; the
proximal part of the epiphysis stretches, in the dura mater, very
nearly to the eye, but whether there is or is not any connection
between the two could not be determined. In this form also
pigment is present in great abundance in the skin, and its
absence above the eye is a marked feature in sections.
PINEAL BYE IN LACERTILIA. 195
Plica (Uraniscodon) umbra.
In this the external indication is particularly clear. The
scales on the dorsal surface of the head are small, save one
whose great size renders it prominent; in the centre of this a
small, white, slightly dome-shaped structure indicates the
position of the eye beneath.
Position of the eye.—The organ lies very far forward on
the dorsal surface, being placed (Pl. XIX, fig. 35) over the
anterior region of the cerebral hemispheres; it is situated
within the parietal foramen, the size of which is far greater
than that of the eye itself, which lies embedded in connective
tissue. The usual absence of pigment immediately above it is
to be noted.
Structure.—The organ was not in a good enough state of
preservation histologically to render any detailed examination
of its structure possible. So far as could be discerned the con-
nection of the eye with the epiphysis is retained, the solid pineal
stalk (Op. s.) running backward immediately within the skull
cavity. Attention may be drawn to one curious point—close
to the eye is a small secondary and deeply pigmented vesicle
(op!.). It may be possible that in the specimen examined this
is merely due to a shrinkage of the walls of the whole optic
vesicle, whereby the anterior and posterior have come into close
contact, and thus simulated the appearance of two vesicles, but,
as far as could be ascertained, this was not the case. The deep
pigmentation of the anterior as well as the posterior wall is
strong evidence against this view.
Iguana tuberculata, Pl. XV, figs. 15 and 16; Pl. XXVII,
fig. 23.
The full description of the organ, which is present highly
developed in Iguana is not given in this paper. I hope before
long to have the opportunity of examining its structure in a
living specimen.
External Indication.—The usual modified scale is present
and in large specimens is very conspicuous. In smaller ones
(Pl. XV, fig. 16) a shghtly raised central portion is present,
196 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
which is devoid of pigment, and transparent enough to allow of
the eye beneath being seen as a dark spot. In larger speci-
mens (fig. 15) the central part is still more raised, and forms a
dome-shaped structure. In the figure, which is twice the size
of the original, the scales from the dorsal surface of the head
are represented, and the prominence of the scale with its
modification to form a cornea can be seen. The only wonder
again is that long before this a careful examination of the
structure has not been made.
Structure.—The eye lies within the parietal foramen, which
is well developed in Iguana, surrounded closely by connective
tissue, there being no capsule present. The eye is so placed
that its optic axis is as nearly as possible in the vertical line.
In shape it simply resembles an inverted cup with the lens,
which has a flattened external surface, occupying the anterior
end. The organ is usually more cup-shaped and symmetrical
than the one figured (Pl. XVII, fig. 23) ; but this, which is
drawn without any of its surroundings, will serve to demon-
strate the structure as far as it will be described in the present
communication.
Lens.—The lens is convex posteriorly, and almost—due to
its anterior surface being flattened—plano-convex in shape ; it
is distinctly cellular, with well-marked nuclei scattered irregu-
larly in section. On either side it thins out to join the walls of
the posterior part, in which, at the line of union, a specially
deep circular ring of pigment is deposited.
Retina.—The rods (R) are well marked and embedded in
deep pigment. In the line of the optic axis is a bundle of
specially elongated ones (R') ; externally they are in contact
with spherical elements (n!), which are as usual of, roughly
speaking, the same size as the nuclei of the lens cells. These
elements, together with the external ends of the rods, appear
to be surrounded by a molecular layer of punctated material,
clearly distinguishable, but yet not so well marked as in
Varanus giganteus. Most externally is a layer of cone-
shaped bodies (Co.), the internal ends of which taper off into
processes connecting them either with the spherical elements
PINEAL BYE IN LACERTILIA. 197
or with the rods. Their flattened bases rest upon the connec-
tive-tissue investment of the eye.
At its posterior extremity enters the pineal stalk. The
appearance of this in one form examined is given in fig. 23,
where it had the form of a simple nervous strand, much as in
Hatteria, the specialised rods running down into it, though
there was no group of nucleated bodies to be seen at their
external ends.
Draco volans.
The eye is present in Draco volans, though the specimens
examined did not make it possible to investigate the structure in
detail, the vesicle walls having apparently shrunk and come to
lie close together, so as to obliterate the internal cavity. The
whole is in a condition, as far as could be ascertained, which
resembles that seen in- Chameleo or Lyriocephalus.
The vesicle is ovoid in shape, and placed with its long axis
in the median line of the head within the parietal foramen ; its
walls are composed of cells with very distinct nuclei, but no
further differentiation to form retina or lens could be distin-
guished, and the vesicle itself was remarkable for the absence
of pigment in its walls, a feature already noticed in Chameleo
and Lyriocephalus. The only pigment present lay in the
dura mater, and surrounded the very posterior extremity of
the vesicle in the position in which the pineal stalk would
enter, though it was not possible to determine the existence of
this.
Externally specimens of Draco differed somewhat in their
indication of the organ, its position being in most cases easily
determined by the presence of a specially modified scale in the
usual position, and bearing a cornea-like space.
Ceratophora aspera.
The organ is indicated externally in the usual manner by a
scale modified to form acornea. Thestructure of the epiphysis
is interesting, being unlike that met with before. In the
specimen examined, though the external indication was present,
the parietal foramen was seen, when sections through the head
198 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
were cut, to be closed. Its position is indicated by a large
blood-vessel which branches on the internal surface of the skull
as it enters the bone exactly as the vessel accompanying the
pineal stalk branches on entering the parietal foramen, the two
branches thus formed pass through to the external surface.
The parietal foramen appears simply to have closed up, the
blood-vessel remaining and piercing the bone.
In many forms such as Leiolemus the optic vesicle is
placed quite on the internal side of the foramen; in such a
form as this were the bone to grow and close up the foramen
the vesicle would be left on the internal surface ; this is exactly
what appears to have taken place in Ceratophora aspera.
The epiphysis has the usual form, being well developed and con-
sisting of a proximal portion at right angles to the roof of the
thalamencephalon, whilst, from the further end, the distal
portion runs forward along the under surface of the dura mater
as the pineal stalk until it ends in a slightly swollen portion
immediately beneath the parietal foramen. This corresponds
to the optic vesicle of other forms ; in structure it appears to be
solid and to consist of rounded elements, resembling very closely
those present and figured by de Graaf in Rana esculenta.
There is this important difference, however, between Amphi-
bia and Lacertilia, that in the former the distal portion of the
epiphysis becomes completely cut off from the proximal and is
placed externally to the skull, whilst in Lacertilia, on the other
hand, the distal part not only remains in connection with the
proximal but is permanently closed within the skull cavity
after closure of the parietal foramen.
Lyriocephalus scutatus.
The usual external indication is present though not so pro-
minent as in many other forms, the scale being somewhat
smaller than those by which it is enclosed posteriorly, which
form a v-shaped ridge behind it, the point of the v being di-
rected backward ; on the scale a circular, slightly raised, trans-
parent part is modified to form a cornea.
Internally the structure of the optic vesicle resembles more
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 199
that of Chameleo than any other, there being no differentia-
tion of the walls to form a lens and retina. The shape of the
vesicle is, however, unlike that of Chameleo, being elongated
dorso-ventrally. Its walls consist of nucleated columnar cells,
and are thicker anteriorly than posteriorly, where there is
present a small amount of pigment on the external surface of
the cells.
The whole structure lies in the parietal foramen, and has the
form, viewed as a solid object, of a small ovoid body whose
anterior end is closely apposed to the connective-tissue, forming
a roof to the parietal foramen, between which and the cuticle
no pigment is present. The pineal stalk is a prominent struc-
ture, entering the posterior end of the vesicle where it unites
with the cells; unfortunately, in the specimen examined the
part with the optic vesicle and portion of the pineal stalk
attached to it was torn away from the underlying structures,
but their can be little doubt from the similarity between this
form and such as Chameleo, that the stalk simply passes back
to join the proximal portion of the epiphysis, the upper part of
which is seen running forward in the dura mater directly
towards the optic vesicle.
Calotes, Pl. XV, figs. 13 and 14; Pl. XVIII, figs. 31 and
S03 Pl. XX fig: 8;
In smaller species of Calotes the external indication of
the eye is most clear. A large median scale is so modified
(fig. 13) as to present precisely the appearance of an eye. In
its centre is a circular black space, within which lies a white
ring enclosing a dark space resembling exactly the pupil. This
effect is produced by reason of the central part of the scale
being transparent and slightly raised into a dome-shaped cornea,
while beneath it lies the pineal eye which, on removal of the
scale, is seen to have a globular form. The external surface is
covered with a glistening white substance, save anteriorly, where
the transparent lens is placed; the internal cavity is lined by
the rods embedded in deep pigment, and hence appears in-
tensely dark when seen through the lens, the whole eye having
200 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
thus the appearance, viewed from above, of a white rim sur-
rounding a dark circular space, and lying immediately beneath
the scale, is easily visible on the dorsal surface of the head.
Calotes ophiomaca and C. versicola.—In both these
species the external indication is very clear, the modified scale
with its corneal, central part forming a prominent object on
the surface of the head : internally the structure is practically
the same in both forms, and the description which follows is
that of the first mentioned of the two species.
Position of the Eye.—The organ is considerably smaller
than the foramen in which it lies, and is enclosed in connective
tissue ; the inner fibres of the cutis vera are so arranged as to
form a dome-shaped structure above the eye (Ct.*) whilst there is
the usual marked absence of pigment between the latter and
the external surface, which is also dome-shaped. The cells of
the rete mucosum are noticeably elongated and columnar im-
mediately above the eye (R.M.).
Structure.—The whole organ is considerably compressed,
in the dorso-ventral line, its longest axis (Pl. XVIII, fig. 33)
lying in the same line with that of the head.
Lens.—The lens is distinctly cellular though the nuclei of
the component cells are not clearly visible (fig. 33, Le.) as in
other form such as Seps (fig. 32). The structure is concavo-
convex in shape, its anterior surface being convex outwards,
whilst certain of the cells on the inner side have become pig-
mented (pig.) and thereby assumed a striking similarity to
the rods.
Retina.—The rods (R.) are very well developed, facing into
the cavity of the optic vesicle; from their external ends pro-
minently marked processes pass to an outer layer of cone-shaped
bodies (Co.), the broad bases of which le upon the external
limiting structure of the eye. There is an absence of any
spherical elements such as are seen in other forms. As before
said, no nuclei can be recognised in the lens, and the failure to
detect both may very probably be due to the fact that the
specimen was not in a very good state of histological preserva-
tion rather than to their being absent.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 201
In connection with the eye a large blood-vessel (B. v.) is
developed which runs up by the side of the epiphysial process
to the foramen.
Epiphysis.—The eye is, as far as could be told, completely
separated off from the brain; the proximal part of the epi-
physis runs, as usual, at right angles to the dorsal surface of
the brain, whilst the median part corresponding to the pineal
stalk of other forms runs forward from the former along the
upper surface of the cranial cavity, ending blindly before the
foramen is reached (fig. 31, Hp'., Op. s.).
Agama hispida, Pl. XIX, fig. 39.
The external indication of the eye is very clear in this form,
consisting, in a specially large scale placed medianly on the
head posteriorly to the paired eyes, in a slight depression and
surrounded by small tubercle-like scales. A raised white rim
encloses a circular space marked by a curious hour-glass
shaped, dark looking patch.
Sections show that the organ lies within the parietal fora-
men and is almost spherical in shape ; above it the connective
tissue of the cutis vera is modified as in other forms (e.g.
Varanus bengalensis), and is entirely free from pigment,
the cells of the rete mucosum being also somewhat elongated
above the eye; the latter is surrounded immediately by vacuo-
late tissue as in Cyclodus or Anolis (figs. 18 and 24). It
is difficult to determine the structure of the eye owing to the
fact that not only the rods, which are long and well marked,
but also the external part of the retina is deeply pigmented ;
it appears as if nearly all the elements lying external to the
rods had degenerated into pigment-bearing cells, amongst
which at intervals spherical elements corresponding to those
of other forms can with difficulty be distinguished. In many
cases processes, also pigmented, pass from the rods to the pig-
ment masses lying external to them.
The lens is distinctly cellular and forms the transparent
anterior boundary to the optic vesicle, though as the walls of
the latter are comparatively thick the cavity is small; even in
202 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
some of the cells of the lens pigment is deposited. It is
difficult to determine whether the organ is or is not yet con-
nected with the proximal part of the epiphysis, owing to the
great development of pigment in the dura mater surrounding
the upper part of the epiphysis, and leading from this to the
eye; it was not possible to say definitely whether in the
specimen examined this did or did not contain a process from
the proximal part of the epiphysis.
Grammatophora barbata.
The scale modified to act as a cornea is present and promi-
nent on the surface of the head.
The eye is present beneath and has apparently (having been
only examined as a solid object) the form of a bulb, very
similar indeed to that already described in Calotes ; in fact, the
figures of this as a solid object (fig. 14) would serve also for
that of Grammatophora. Externally the bulb is covered
with a glistening white substance, whilst internally it is lined
by deep pigment in which the rods are embedded. Above the
eye, which does not appear to be connected with the epiphysial
stalk, pigment is, as usual, entirely wanting in the skin.
Moloch horridus, Pl. XIX, fig. 36.
External Appearance.—In the specimen examined the
external indication was very well marked, consisting of a cir-
cular dark space, surrounded again at a short distance by a
dark circular line, and lying upon a small smooth space in the
median line dorsally amongst the stiff horn-like processes
covering the head.
Position of Eye.—Longitudinal sections at once showed
(Pl. XIX, fig. 36) that this space corresponded roughly in
extent to that of the parietal foramen, and that within this and
close beneath the surface lay the eye. Unfortunately like
many others this specimen was in too bad a state of pre-
servation to do more than enable me to ascertain with
certainty the presence and general outline of the organ. It is
remarkable for its spherical shape, deep pigment, and com-
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 203
parative size. These points are indicated in fig. 36 where the
eye is drawn as a solid object. It will be seen that it lies
close beneath the surface, the skin being here completely
devoid of pigment and quite smooth, forming in fact a cornea
(Cor.). As far as could be ascertained, though the point could
not be determined with certainty owing to the state of preser-
vation of the specimen, the eye is connected, as represented
diagrammatically with the proximal part of the epiphysis by
the solid pineal stalk (Op. s. ?).
Leiodera nitida, Pl. XVII, fig. 22; Pl. XIX, fig. 38.
External Appearance.—The specialised scale (Pl. XIX,
fig. 38) forms a prominent feature in the median dorsal line of
the head, bearing in its centre a small dome-shaped structure
perfectly white, and hence standing out in clear contrast to
the deeply-pigmented scale, of which it is a_ specialised
portion.
Position of the Eye.—The organ lies closely embedded
in connective tissue, and not really filling up the parietal
foramen, than which it is considerably smaller. The layers of
the skin above it are so modified as to form the external dome-
shaped structure already noticed, whilst pigment is markedly
absent from this part, though present on either side (fig. 22,
Ct. pig.). A very striking feature in section is the peculiar
elongation of the cells of the rete mucosum (R. M.), whose in-
ternal ends appear in many cases to be prolonged downwards,
each cell being so placed that its long axis is at right angles to
the surface at that particular spot. The connective tissue,
further, very closely invests the eye, whilst no such well-
developed blood-vessel is to be recognised as is met with in
most Cases.
Structure.—The organ has a very definite shape shown in
fig. 22, being depressed dorso-ventrally, as a result of which the
cavity of the vesicle is very small.
Lens.—The lens is well developed, and, as usual, cellular,
the nuclei of its cells being prominent in section, and so
arranged that they form in the main a line from side to side.
VOL, XXVII, PART 2.—NEW SER. P
204 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
It is thickest in the line of the optic axis, and thins off to each
side, where it joins the retina. The lens is, in fact, doubly
convex, its anterior surface being in close contact with the
investing connective tissue, and parallel to the surface of the
dome-shaped cornea above.
Retina.—The retina, owing to the compression of the eye,
may be likened in shape to the walls of an oblong box, the
lid of which is formed by the lens. The rods line the internal
surface, and are very clearly marked ; none appear to be espe-
cially elongated ; their external ends are in connection with a
layer of spherical-shaped elements (n'), as in other forms these
elements being also of the same size as the nuclei of the lens.
Most externally lie a layer of cone-shaped bodies (Co.), whose
inner ends taper off into processes passing to the spherical or
rod elements, whilst their broad bases lie upon the external
limiting membrane of the eye.
Epiphysis.—The eye appears to be completely separated
off from the proximal part of the epiphysis, which consists of
(1) a proximal part with walls of distinctly nucleated cells,
which extends vertically from the thalamencephalon to the roof
of the brain cavity ; and (2) of a solid thin part running for-
ward along the brain roof from the proximal part towards, but
not reaching as far as, the parietal foramen; it is enveloped
in pigment, and, being very thin, is somewhat difficult to
trace.
Anguis fragilis, Pl. XVII, fig. 25.
This form has been described and figured in detail by de
Graaf,! but in certain important points I am unable to agree
with him.
Fig. 25 represents, somewhat diagrammatically, a longitu-
dinal vertical section through the foramen, the eye, and the
epiphysis. The eye in the specimen figured was considerably
smaller than the foramen, and the epiphysis was remarkable
for running forward until very close to the eye, whilst its distal
rounded extremity was invested by pigment cells (Ep. pig.).
1 Op. cit., pl. 4, fig. 34.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 205
As described by de Graaf, the eye is separated off from the
epiphysis. In his figure the lens is shown completely separated
off from the retina, which overlaps it anteriorly. This does
not appear to be the case; but, on the contrary, the eye, as
far as could be told, agreed with all other forms examined in
having the lens directly continuous with the posterior walls of
the vesicle.!
The most important point of difference, however, is concerned
with the retina. De Graaf figures this (Pl. 4, fig. 34) as
having a layer of unpigmented rods (s/.)—his “ Staafjeslaag”—
together with a layer of unpigmented cells (cep.)—his “ Cyilin-
dercellenlaag”—lying internal to the pigmented rods.
Of neither of these two layers can I succeed in finding any
trace, either in Anguis fragilis, or in any of the forms yet
examined. In every instance all that can be discerned within
the rods is merely the remains of what may be supposed to have
been during life the fluid contents of the vesicle. In coagu-
lating this does in some instances appear to attach itself to the
parts of the rods facing into the cavity, but never forms, in any
specimen examined hitherto, any structures so definite as to be
interpreted into the “ Staafjeslaag” or “ Cyllindercellenlaag”
of de Graaf.
Cyclodus gigas, Pl. XV, fig. 9; Pl. XVI, figs. 18, 19, and
20); Pl XVITT; figs 29); Plt XX, fig? 5.
In Cyclodus the epiphysis is not developed into an eye,
but the structure is nevertheless in an interesting state, showing
most probably a stage passed through during the development
of the eye in other forms.
External Appearance.—lIn fig. 9 is represented a portion
of the scale specially modified in connection with the organ.
It lies, as in all other forms, in the median line posterior to
1 In my first communication to ‘ Nature,’ the lens of Hatteria was described
as separated from the retina, but examination of a fresh specimen showed at
once this was a result due to slight post-mortem degeneration of the tissues,
and that in reality the two were perfectly continuous, a result which subse.
quent investigations of many forms has fully confirmed,
206 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
the paired eyes, and is easily discernible in the living animal,
one of which I was enabled to examine. It consists of a dark
patch, having again the appearance of a membrane stretched
tensely over a cavity, surrounded by an irregular, slightly-
raised, white border, represented in the figure, in which is
drawn only the central part of the scale.
Thus the modification to form a ‘ cornea” is, as reference to
the figure will show, in a rudimentary state, and foreshadows
the similarly rudimentary condition of the organ beneath. In
fig. 29 is represented a solid side view of the brain, showing
the position of the pineal gland; it lies enclosed in the brain
membranes, and fitting closely into the parietal foramen, out
of which it is easily removed along with the dura mater. The
epiphysis is very long, and stretches far forward beyond the
roof of the thalamencephalon, almost to the anterior extremity
of the cerebral hemispheres, its distal extremity being deeply
embedded in pigment in the dura mater, and having the
appearance, as in fig. 29, of a dark, swollen mass.
In section it is seen that the epiphysis is hollow throughout
its whole course, the cavity being in direct communication
with the third ventricle; the cells composing its walls are all
columnar in nature and distinctly nucleated, cilia also being
easily distinguished in most parts.
The whole may be divided into two parts: (1) a proximal
portion, stretching from the roof of the thalamencephalon in
the form of a tube to the parietal foramen ; and (2) a swollen
distal extremity lying in the latter, and closely invested by
vacuolate tissue. In other words, the epiphysis in Cyclodus
has the form of a vesicle attached to the brain by a
hollow stalk. The vesicle may be regarded as homologous
with the eye of other lizards in a rudimentary state,! and the
hollow connecting process with the solid pineal stalk and
proximal part of the epiphysis of such a form as Hatteria.
In figs. 19 and 20 is represented, on a larger scale, the
structure of the anterior and posterior walls of the vesicle (by
the anterior wall is meant that nearest the external surface).
1 It may also be closely compared with the condition in adult Hlasmobranchs.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 207
In both, the cells are seen to be much elongated with very dis-
tinct nuclei; in the case of the anterior ones, save for the
presence of well-marked cilia, they differ but little from those
of a lens. An elongation of those lying in the middle would,
in fact, transform this into the lens of such a form as Lacerta
ocellata (Pl. XVIII, fig. 30).
Passing to the posterior surface, however, a curious but
interesting modification takes place (cf. figs. 19 and 20), the
nuclei all pass to the external surface, whilst the
ends of the cells, which are left facing into the cavity
of the vesicle, bear a close resemblance to the rod-
like structures of the retina of other forms.
It is possible that we have here a stage in the development
of the retina. The internal portion of the cell forms the
“vod,” the nucleus passes to the external end, and with the
protoplasm lying around it forms the spherical-shaped element
of the retina, still retaining its connection with the rod. Other
cells, lying on the opposite side (supposing the wall of the
vesicle, as in Cyclodus, to be more than one cell thick),
become transformed into the external-lying elements of the
retina, their protoplasm becoming in part drawn out into pro-
cesses, which enter into connection with those of other cells,
in part remaining around the nuclei, forming thus the external
spherical elements and the processes connecting these with each
other. This development would give exactly such a structure
as has been already described in Varanus giganteus. In
this form it is noticeable that the spherical elements of the
retina consist of nuclei with a small amount of protoplasm
around them, the nuclei being identical in size with those of
the lens, the greater part of the protoplasm of the cells seeming
to be developed into processes connecting the various elements.
By this means is developed a network of branched cells, con-
nected on the one hand with rods, and on the other with nerve-
fibres.
In Cyclodus the stage is reached and retained in which the
rods have begun to be formed by a removal of the nuclei to
the outer ends of the cells, where they form, together with
208 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
those of the external-lying cells, a prominent layer (figs. 18
and 20, n.).
Lacerta.
Two species of this genus have been examined.
(1) Lacerta viridis, Pl. XVII, fig. 26.
In this form the external indication, though recognisable, is
not at all prominent, consisting merely in a dark circular space
upon a median scale.
The organ lies immediately beneath this within the foramen ;
it is flattened out dorso-ventrally and embedded in deep pig-
ment, as represented in fig. 26, where it is drawn as a solid
object. Its smallness and the great deposition of pigment
rendered it very difficult to examine the structure in detail,
and the backward extension of the pigment towards the epi-
physis made it also difficult to distinguish any pineal stalk,
though in parts there were indications of its existence (Hp. 7) ;
this pigment may, however, be a deposition in the brain mem-
branes which must once have surrounded the stalk connecting
the vesicle with the epiphysis, and which persist after the
separation of the two has taken place.
(2) Lacerta ocellata, Pl. XVIII, figs. 27, 28, and 30.
In this the external indication of the organ is far more con-
spicuous than in L. viridis; the scale with its dark central
circular space, surrounded by a slightly raised light-coloured
rim, forming a well-marked feature on the dorsal surface of the
head.
Position of the Eye.—This differs somewhat from that of
other forms inasmuch as it lies closer to the external surface ;
the connective tissue in which it lies completely fills up the
foramen, and when the brain, together with its membranes, are
pulled away internally from the skull, the eye is brought away
with them (Pl. XVIII, fig. 28). The position within the
foramen is represented in fig. 27, where the eye is drawn as a
solid object surrounded by a great number of branched pig-
ment cells. The foramen is supposed to be cut in half longitu-
dinally and vertically, one side being removed to show the
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 209
eye; the connective tissue enclosing it being omitted for the
sake of clearness.
Structure.—In shape the eye resembles more than any-
thing else a hemisphere, the equatorial plane being occupied
by the lens, which is, in shape, almost concavo-convex, its
outer, anterior surface being flattened. The bulb is encased
closely by the connective tissue of the dura mater (D. M.), a
thin layer passing in front of the lens, whilst all the posterior
surface is surrounded by,branched pigment cells (pig.*).
Lens.—The lens has the usual cellular structure, being
thinnest round the margin where it is continuous with the
retina; the nuclei of its component cells form a well-marked
layer running across it in section from side to side.
Retina.— Within the retina a considerable deposition of
pigment in various parts indicates, to a certain extent, degen-
eracy, and at the same time renders the examination of its
structure difficult.
The rods (R) are well marked, and in places present the
appearance of being striated. Two bundles of rods are slightly
elongated (R'), being in connection with two distinct nervous
strands entering the retina posteriorly. External to the rods
lie spherical nucleated elements arranged in two layers, an
inner (v!) and an outer (n”), whilst amongst them much
pigment is scattered in small granules, rendering their detec-
tion difficult; in parts still larger masses of pigment are
present, which may perhaps be due to the degeneracy of the
spherical elements into pigment-bearing cells.
Epiphysis.—As before said, two distinct nervous strands
may be seen entering the retina posteriorly and close together
(ne), one being larger than the other; back from these two,
which soon unite, may be traced a single nervous strand which
it is extremely difficult to follow, owing to its close investment
by connective tissue of the dura mater, but which J believe
runs downwards and backwards until it joins the proximal
part of the epiphysis (p.), which is considerably swollen and
has a curious development of pigment in its walls. |
Along with the pineal stalk runs the usual blood-vessel,
210 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
which on nearing the eye bulb breaks up into numerous
branches which ramify (figs. 27 and 30, B. v.) amongst the
pigment cells encasing the eye.
Zootoca vivipara.
The presence and structure of the eye in this form has been
described to a certain extent by Leydig, though he failed to
recognise its connection with the epiphysis, and did not apply
to it the name of eye. The presence of deep pigment in the
specimen examined makes it impossible to describe in detail
the structure of the retina. Pigment is also thickly deposited
in the skin, but it is seen in section to end abruptly on each
side of the parietal foramen; so thick is the layer of pigment
that no light, save for this provision, could possibly reach the
pineal eye.
The eye has the usual form of a hollow vesicle with the lens
anteriorly, lying immediately beneath the specialised scale.
Pigment runs from the proximal part of the epiphysis to the
eye, but, as far as could be told, the latter is separated from the
brain.
The eye is present in early stages, before any definite indi-
cation of the parietals can be distinguished ; in an embryo
whose head measured 6 mm. in length, the eye is a prominent
object on the dorsal surface of the head, immediately beneath
the skin. It is flattened in the dorso-ventral line so that the
cavity is small; anteriorly the lens is differentiated and its
cells are perfectly continuous with those of the vesicle behind,
which are being transformed into the retinal elements, though
the fine pigment granules already deposited throughout their
substance (and absent from those of the lens) render it dif-
ficult to distinguish the different elements; facing into the
vesicle, however, the rods can be seen around which the pig-
ment granules are thickest; external to these lie spherical
elements massed closely together and not yet separated into
definite layers. These may very probably be regarded as the
nuclei of the cells whose internal parts are becoming trans-
formed into rods. The eye appears to be connected with the
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 211
proximal portion of the epiphysis by a fibrous strand, such as
is represented by De Graaf as connecting the distal with the
proximal portion of the epiphysis in Bufo cinerea.
Seps chalcidica, Pl. XVIII, fig. 32; Pl. XX, fig. 5.
External Appearance.—The external modification is not
so evident in this form as in some others. If one of the
median scales posterior to the paired eyes on the dorsal surface
of the head be examined it will be found to have upon it a
dark-coloured oval patch (hence distinguishable from the
yellow-brown surface of the scale) ; this, which has the charac-
teristic appearance of a membrane stretched over a space
beneath, indicates the position of the eye lying beneath it.
Position of the Eye.—The eye lies somewhat on the inner
side of the foramen (Pl. XVIII, fig. 32), there being as usual
no pigment between it and the external surface. It is remark-
able in being the only one in the forms yet examined, which is
larger than the foramen ; its relation to this is shown in the
figure, where it is seen that the parietal bones overlap it on each
side to a small extent; if by any reason the foramen became
closed then the eye would be situated intracranially, whilst in
Amphibia the position is always extracranial, when the distal
vesicle of the epiphysis becomes, as in Anura, separated off
from the proximal. The eye is surrounded immediately by a
great development of pigment bearing tissue which fills up
what part of the foramen is not occupied by the organ itself.
Structure.—The whole eye is, in longitudinal vertical
section, seen to be elliptical in shape, the long axis correspond-
ing in position with that of the head and hence forming a strong
contrast to such an eye as that of Anolis (Pl. XVIII, fig. 24).
Lens.—The lens is distinctly cellular, the nuclei of the
constituent cells forming a line prominent in section across
from side to side, slightly nearer to the inner than to the
outer surface; the whole is doubly convex in shape, thickest
in the line of the optic axis, and thinnest where it is continuous
with the retina.
Retina.—The specimen not being in very good order histo-
ZrZ W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
logically, the structure of the retina could not be determined
with any great amount of accuracy. The rods as usual formed
the most prominent feature; at their external ends in certain
parts spherical elements could be distinguished (n!), whilst, most
externally, elements corresponding doubtless to the cone-shaped
ones of other eyes were present (Co.). In many parts external
to the rods masses of pigment (pig.”), indicating doubtless
degeneracy in the tissues of the retina, were present.
Connection with the brain.—The eye is apparently
completely separated off from the brain, no pineal stalk being
recognisable.
General Account of the Structure in Lacertilia.
The above account reveals the epiphysis within the group
Lacertilia as a structure of very varied development, in
some forms presenting merely the appearance of a hollow
process from the roof of the thalamencephalon, in others being
modified into a well-marked eye, whilst between these two
extremes various intermediate forms are found. In taking a
short general review of the results detailed above we may deal
with them under the four following heads :
(1) General Formof the Epiphysis.'—The simplest form
seen isin Platydactylus, where it has merely the structure of
a hollow outgrowth running at right angles to the surface of the
thalamencephalon until it reaches the dura mater lining the
cranial cavity. In Hatteria, on the other hand, we have a form
in which specialisation is carried to its furthest extent, with the
result that the epiphysis becomes modified into three parts—(1)
a proximal part, still hollow, and connected with the brain roof,
(2) a median, solid pineal stalk, serving to connect the former with
(3) the distal portion differentiated into an optic organ. These
forms may be taken as two extremes, the gap between which is
filled up by various modifications : thus in Cyclodus the epi-
physis instead of running straight upwards turns forwards, and at
the distal end swells out into a vesicle whose walls show a trace
1 Compare the diagram showing the development of the epiphysis in various
forms on Pl. XX.
PINEAL EYE IN LAOERTILIA. 2138
of differentiation into lens anteriorly and retina posteriorly ; the
hollow connection with the brain persisting through life. In
such forms again as Calotes, Seps, or Leiodera the same
differentiation into an optic organ with retinal elements takes
place as in Hatteria, but the connection with the brain is
lost. In a few forms further, such as Chameleo vulgaris
and Lyriocephalus scutatus, the development of the epi-
physis is carried to a great extent, resulting in a division into
three parts, as in Hatteria, but the distal vesicle is not
differentiated into an eye, its walls retaining their primitive
structure.
In Varanus giganteus a peculiar modification takes
place, seen in no other form examined ; the pineal stalk, which
is well developed, breaking up into three divisions before
the eye is reached, whilst in V. bengalensis the eye is
apparently separated from the proximal portion of the epi-
physis, and the part equivalent to the pineal stalk of the other
species is hollow and ends beneath the optic vesicle in a slight
swelling.
(2) State of Retinal Elements.—Dealing with the
state of development of the retinal elements, the eyes are found
to differ to no little extent in this respect; thus in Hatteria
it is better developed than in any other form examined: im
Varanus, on the other hand, while the elements can be dis-
tinguished the whole eye is marked by a great deposition of
pigment ; even in the centre of the lens a large globular mass
is present which must effectually prevent the entrance of light
to the vesicle in the line of the optic axis, whilst, in addition
to this, many of the retinal elements degenerate into pigment-
bearing cells. In others, such as Anolis, almost all the
elements are enveloped in pigment, whilst in others,as Agama
hispida, so great is the deposition that it is not possible to
distinguish any elements save the rods. In contrast to this we
find in some genera, such as Chameleo and Lyriocephalus
that no pigment is present at all, and, accompanying this
absence of pigment, it is found that the vesicle is
not developed into an eye, its walls retaining their
214 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
primitive structure of columnar cells, ciliated in-
ternally. In Cyclodus again we find another modification
present, the epiphysis having apparently reached a stage passed
through in the development of the eye of other Lacertilia;
a vesicle is formed distally, but the pineal stalk remains widely
open, very little pigment is present amongst the cells, and no
true eye is found. In Ceratophora, lastly, the distal
extremity of the epiphysis is placed within the cranial cavity
beneath the spot, corresponding in position to the parietal
foramen of other forms; the portion equivalent to the optic
vesicle is present, forming a slightly swollen mass at the distal
extremity of the pineal stalk (?), consisting of rounded elements
very similar to those present in the extracranial part of the
epiphysis of Bufo cinerea.
(3) External Modification.— When we come to deal with
the external modification it is very remarkable to notice that a
high development in this is by no means necessarily accom-
panied by, or the index of, a highly-developed sense-organ
beneath. In Varanus giganteus the external indication is
extremely well marked, whilst the eye beneath is also well
developed, and connected with the pineal stalk ; in Hatteria,
on the other hand, the eye is still better developed, the retinal
elements being more clearly differentiated, whilst there is quite
absent that great development of pigment which must indicate
to a certain extent degeneracy in the eye of Varanus. Despite
this there isin Hatteria no external modification, or, at all
events, only a very slight one present indicating the position of
the eye beneath ; the latter also lies deeply embedded in connec-
tive tissue—deeper still than in the case of Varanus—though, as
in every other form, there is a marked absence of pigment
between the eye and the surface of the head. Thus, in the one
of these two forms in which the organ is most highly de-
veloped, we find that the external modification is much the
least evident. If, again, such genera as Calotes, Seps,
Leiodera, and Anolis be taken, in these the modified scale
is so prominent as to form the most noticeable feature on the
dorsal surface of the head, and to resemble a cornea; below it
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 215
the eye is in a more or less highly developed state, its elements
often obscured by deposition of pigment, but revealing in all
cases, even when best developed, its rudimentary nature by the
absence of any nervous connection with the brain.
(4) Position of the Eye.—With regard to the position
of the eye considerable variation is seen. In such forms as
Calotes, Leiodera, Anolis, or Agama, for example, the
eye is close beneath the external surface, lying in the upper
part of the well-marked parietal foramen. In Varanus the
eye lies somewhat deeper, whilst in Hatteria it is placed
deeper still on the inner side of the foramen, and in both forms
a great development of connective tissue takes place, the latter
being in every instance arranged in a definite manner. In
Lacerta ocellata and Cyclodus the eye is placed within the
parietal foramen, fitting it closely, the foramen having the
form (see Pl. XVIII, fig. 27) of a truncated cone, whose apex
hes externally. In Ceratophora aspera finally, the parietal
foramen is closed, and the modified distal portion of the epi-
physis hes quite within the skull cavity. The connective-tissue
encasements of the eye also show some variations. In Hat-
teria is seen the highest development in this respect, the eye
lying in a definite capsule, and having special supporting fibres
stretching across to it from the walls in the anterior part. In
Varanus the arrangement of the connective-tissue fibres
appear to indicate the fact that a capsule formerly enclosing
the eye, as in Hatteria, has become filled up with fibres, so
that the eye is now immovably fixed. In other forms, again,
such as Cyclodus, Anolis, or Anguis, it lies surrounded
by vacuolate tissue, whilst in others, as Chameleo, Lacerta
ocellata, Leiodera, Monitor, Uraniscodon, Calotes,
and various other genera, the connective tissue, without any
trace of capsule, closely invests the eye, no space being left
within the parietal foramen.
If now we take typical examples from amongst the Lacertilia,
and consider the state of development in each with regard to
the above four points, it is seen that no one form shows a high
216 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
state in all, some being well developed in one and some in
another respect, but each being degenerate in at least one of
the four features.
Referring to the latter under the numbers (1), (2), (3), and
(4), and taking first Hatteria, we find that it shows in (1)
and (2) a high, in (3) a low, and in (4) a somewhat low state.
Varanus giganteus shows in (]) a high, in (2) a con-
siderably degenerate, in (3) a high, and in (4) a somewhat low
state.
Calotes shows in (1) a degenerate (i.e. connection with
brain lost), in (2) a somewhat degenerate, in (3) a very high,
and in (4:) a high state of development.
Chameleo vulgaris shows in (1) a high, in (2) a low, in
(3) a fairly high, and in (4) a somewhat low state.
The same result exactly is obtained when each form is tested
in the same way, showing that the organ is never present
in a perfectly functional state, but always presents
some one feature, at least, in which it is more or less
imperfect.
We are thus brought to the conclusion that the pineal eye
in Lacertilia is a rudimentary structure—that at the
present time it is not so highly developed as it must have been
at some previous period when fully functional.
It is, indeed, difficult to ascertain whether the structure is
now functional at all. In lizards, whose paired eyes are closed,
no result is obtained by rapidly focussing a strong beam of
light on to the modified eye scale, and thus on to the pineal
eye; in fact, strong light suddenly focussed into one of the
paired eyes merely causes the lid to be drawn down without
any further apparent result, whilst in the pineal eye there is no
protecting lid, and no movement whatever takes place to remove
the eye from the direction in which the light is coming.
Wiedersheim has, since the greater part of this paper was
written and the preliminary communication to the Royal
Society published, attempted to show that the organ is func-
tional and not rudimentary ; he bases his conclusions upon the
study of several forms such as Varanus, in which, as pre-
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 217
viously described by myself, a most noticeable feature is the
absence of pigment between the eye and the exterior. This is
certainly very clearly marked and, further, is perfectly constant ;
but there can be no doubt, in face of the descriptions given
above, that, if we use the term “rudimentary organs” to
include such as are now from change in their structure less
capable of fulfilling their function than they have been at
some previous time, then within this category must certainly
be included the pineal eye of Lacertilia. Such features as the
great development of pigment in, for example, Varanus, or
the loss of connection with the brain in many, such as
Calotes, are surely only capable of explanation on the suppo-
sition that the organ is rudimentary.
One of the most prominent features in connection with the
organ is its Invertebrate structure. This was pointed
out by de Graaf in Angius fragilis, but in none of the
forms examined have any structures equivalent to the rod-like
bodies placed internally to those embedded in deep pigment,
described and figured by him as present in the above-men-
tioned species, been found. There is often, however, a struc-
tureless substance resembling a coagulum present within the
vesicle, which doubtless represents the remains of a humour
which was fluid during life; in certain cases it appears to have
attached itself to the inner ends of the rods and thus simulates
to a certain extent elements lying internal to and connected
with them. Further, there seems to be but little ground for
likening the eye to that of Cephalopods and Pteropods, as is
done by de Graaf; the structure of the retina is different, and
that of the lens essentially so, being formed as a cuticular se-
cretion in Mollusca, whilst in Lacertilia it is distinctly cellular
and formed directly from the cells of the neural canal.
As before! pointed out the development and structure ot
this organ is extremely interesting, as showing that out of
the walls of a vesicle originating as a hollow out-
growth from the neural canal, may be formed an optic
1 “Nature,” May, 1886.
218 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
organ of the Invertebrate type, whilst from the walls
of a precisely similar vesicle, and within the same
animal, may be formed an eye of the Vertebrate
ty pe.
In both cases the nerve-fibres enter into connection with
the retinal elements lying on the side remote from the rods ;
in one case, however, important secondary developments take
place which are wanting in the other, and to which are further
entirely due the differences existing between the two types of
eyes.
In the case of the pineal eye, first, we have a vesicle, the
anterior portion of the walls of which are transformed into the
lens ; of the cells forming the walls of the posterior half, those
facing into the cavity give rise to the rods, whilst external to
these are formed the other retinal elements, into connection
with which enter the fibres of the pineal stalk ; the primary
optic vesicle persists, and there is thus formed an eye on what
is usually spoken of as “ the Invertebrate type,” i.e. the rods
facing directly into the cavity of the vesicle, and the nerve
entering into connection with the external lying elements.
In the case of the paired eye, however, we find that, whilst
up to a certain point it agrees in development precisely with
the pineal eye, after that point is reached secondary struc-
tures appear which have an important influence on its final
form. The retinal elements are formed out of the cells of the
vesicle wall; the lens, however, is not, but arises as an invagi-
nation which pushes before it the external wall; whilst there is
this difference between the lenses of the two forms, we see at
once, when dealing with the retinal elements, that they are
formed in a similar position to that in which they are present
in the pineal eye—that is, the cells facing into the optic
vesicle give rise to the rod-elements, whilst the external
lying cells give rise to what are really the outer layers of the
retina (nuclear and molecular layers, &c.). It is simply the
formation of the lens as an invagination which causes the rods
to assume what appears to be an external position, but is
external only when regarded in connection with a secondarily
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 219
formed cavity, the primary optic cavity which persists in the
pineal eye entirely disappearing in the paired eyes.
There is, however, this difference, that in the pineal eye the
posterior portion of the vesicle wall forms the retina, in the
paired eyes the anterior; the lens of the pineal eye being a
structure totally distinct from that of the paired eyes.
In the pineal eye both light transmitting and
light receiving structures are formed out of the
walls of the neural canal; the absence of this in the
paired eye does not perhaps constitute so great a difference as
appears at first sight, for though the lens is not formed out of
the neural wall it is formed out of epiblast cells exactly as this
is, and in such forms as the Amphibia, where the epiblast is
divided into two layers, nervous and epidermic, then the lens
is formed solely by the cells of the nervous layer.
In both cases, finally, the nerve-fibres are in connection
with the external lying elements and retain this connection
throughout life, to do which, after invagination has taken
place in the paired eyes, they must pierce the walls of the
secondary vesicle; there is thus produced the phenomenon of
the nerve-fibres spreading out “in front of” (as it is called),
and internal to, the retinal elements, though, morphologically
speaking, they are behind and external to them, exactly as in the
pineal eye.
Significance of the Organ.
In all forms of Vertebrates the epiphysis arises at an early
stage as a hollow outgrowth from the roof of the thalamen-
cephalon. Goette stated that the epiphysis was identical in posi-
tion with the anterior neuropore—the part at which the walls of
the neural canal remained longest in connection with the epiblast
—but there seems to be no doubt whatever that this is not the
case and that the rudiment of the epiphysis is formed at an early
period in a position some little way posterior to that of the an-
terior neuropore. There can thus be no connection between
the persistent anterior neuropore of Amphioxus and the epi-
physis of other animals, supposing the former to be equivalent
to the neuropore of remaining Chordata, which cannot be
VOL. XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER. Q
220 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
regarded as perfectly certain when its relationship to the
anterior end of the notochord is considered.
In Petromyzon, according to Ahlborn,' the epiphysis
arises as a hollow outgrowth from the roof of the thalamen-
cephalon, which in subsequent development becomes divided
into three parts, (a) a proximal solid stalk, (b) two distal vesi-
cles of which the larger is the uppermost, whilst the smaller
acquires a secondary connection with the left ganglion habe-
nulz. The whole lies within the cartilages enclosing the brain,
and though a certain rod-like appearance is subsequently pro-
duced in the cells, particularly those of the upper vesicle, still
no pigment is developed and no differentiation into retina or
lens takes place.
In Elasmobranchs? the epiphysis stretches forward as a
hollow outgrowth with a dilated end, which may
remain within the skull cavity or be enclosed in the cartilage
of the roof.
In Amphibia’ the same development takes place in early
stages, the organ remaining in Urodeles as a mushroom-shaped
structure, whilst in Anura it is differentiated into a vesicle
distally and a solid fibrous stalk proximally, the former being
afterwards cut off and occupying an extracranial position im-
mediately beneath the skin.
In Reptilia it arises in all forms as a hollow, forwardly
directed outgrowth, which becomes most highly differentiated
in Lacertilia, where, in many forms, its distal vesicular por-
tion forms an optic organ.
In Aves the structure also stretches forward, originating as
a hollow outgrowth, and being subsequently divided into a
distal part which becomes vascular and a proximal solid stalk.
In Mammalia, finally, the structure.is much less developed,
the process being shorter than in the lower forms and directed
backwards.
1 « Untersuchungen iiber das Gehirn der Petromyzon,” ‘ Zeit. f. Wiss.,’
Bd. xxxix, p. 230, Tf. 13 and 16.
2 Balfour, ‘ Elasm. Fishes,’ p. 17.
3 Henri de Graaf, op. cit., p. 23 (Urodeles) and p. 27 (Anura).
PINEAL BYE IN LACERTILIA. 7p |
Taking thus the animal kingdom as a whole, we see that the
epiphysis presents in all forms below mammals the following
two points in common with regard to its structure.
(1) It originates as a hollow vesicular outgrowth stretching
forward from the roof of the thalamencephalon.
(2) It becomes divided during development into two main
divisions.
(a) A distal vesicle.
(6) A stalk (hollow or solid) connecting (a) with the
brain roof.
In Mammalia the first of these two points obtains (except
that the structure stretches backwards instead of forwards),
but degeneration of the tissues sets in at an early period and
secretion of solid material takes place in the part corresponding
to the hollow vesicle of other forms.
In Aves both points obtain, but in course of development
the distal vesicle becomes solid and highly vascular. Below
Aves it apparently remains vesicular throughout life save in
the Anura where the distal division separates off, becomes
solid, and lies extracranially.
So far as is known to us at present the distal portion becomes
most highly modified in Lacertilia ; further investigations into
its structure in other groups is needed, but, as far as our present
knowledge goes, we are justified in saying that in Lacertilia
alone, amongst living forms, the distal part of the epiphysis is
modified into an eye and the tissues between it and the external
surface are modified so as to allow of the easy transmission of
rays of light to the organ.
In Petromyzon certainly the structure of the organ as
figured by Ahlborn resembles somewhat an eye, but closer ex-
amination reveals considerable differences between it and the
eye of any Lacertilian.
(1) Its division into two vesicles, one above the other, is a
point of some importance, indicating that in this case develop-
ment takes place along another line from that pursued in
Lacertilia, where the vesicle always remains single.
(2) The absence of true retinal elements or lens is remark-
Doe, W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
able. At first sight Ahlborn’s figures of the organ, especially
of the walls of the upper vesicle, call to mind the rod elements
of other forms, but a closer examination again reveals important
points of difference; they do not, as in Lacertilia, face into
the cavity, being bounded internally as well as externally by
nervous matter, and, more important still, there is an entire
absence of pigment, which is the prominent feature possessed
in common by the rods ofall Lacertilian eyes. Further, again,
the cavity of the optic vesicle is traversed by strands of nervous
matter passing from the anterior to the posterior wall, a feature
entirely wanting in any pineal eye, however degenerate, amongst
Lacertilia.
On the other hand, these rod-like structures occupy the
hinder wall of the vesicle, the proper position, supposing them
to be true but degenerate retinal elements; and it may be
remembered that amongst Lacertilia, which must be regarded
as descended from ancestors possessed of pineal eyes, we do
know of one form (Cyclodus) in which the eye now stops at
a stage of development in which the cells of the posterior wall
much resemble those of Petromyzon, and are devoid of
pigment. The absence of lens also is paralleled in the case of
Cyclodus.
(3) The organ is completely enclosed within the cartilaginous
cranium, and acquires a secondary connection with the brain
(its lower vesicle fusing with the left ganglion habenule)
which is quite unknown amongst any Lacertilian.
The conclusion to be drawn from ‘these facts! is that at the
present time the epiphysis of Petromyzon certainly does not
become modified into a pineal eye at all comparable to that of
1 For our knowledge of the structure of the epiphysis of Petromyzon we
must rely on Ahlborn’s description here quoted ; it is, of course, possible that,
viewed in the light of recent work, the structures described by him might be
found to bear another interpretation. I have not at present been able to study
the structure, but would suggest the possibility of what Ahlborn figures as
nervous material lying internal to the rod-like structures, and as strands of
tissue crossing from the anterior to the posterior wall of the vesicle, being in
reality only the coagulated remains of the fluid contents of the vesicle.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 923
Lacertilia, in which its double nature and secondary fusion
with the brain are quite unparalleled. At the same time it is of
course possible, though we have no direct evidence of the fact,
that the epiphysis is in a rudimentary state, and may be the
degenerate representative of a once well-developed pineal eye.
The general structure of the organ—a distal vesicular part with
a solid proximal stalk—being in favour of this view, as is also
the resemblance—upon which, however, too much stress must
not be laid, between the walls of the upper vesicle and those of
the swollen extremity of the epiphysis in Cyclodus.
Further investigations into the structure of the epiphysis are
much needed amongst Pisces. At present it is known that
amongst Elasmobranchs the structure developes as a hollow
outgrowth from the roof of the thalamencephalon. This, as
figured by Balfour in Scyllium,! stretches forward right over
the cerebral hemisphere, and comes finally to consist of (1) a
swollen distal extremity, and (2) a hollow stalk connecting (1)
with the brain roof. The swollen extremity may further remain,
as in Raja, external to the cranium, or become embedded
within the cartilage,asin Acanthias. There is thus a striking
similarity between this and the epiphysis at a certain stage of
development in Lacertilia and the final stage persistent in
Cyclodus.
When, however, we come to the Amphibia we find that
amongst these the epiphysis passes through precisely the same
forms in development, but (1) remains very rudimentary indeed
in Urodela, and (2) after reaching a considerably higher stage
of development in Anura undergoes great degeneration. The
structure in the latter becomes differentiated into a distal
vesicle, connected by a solid pineal stalk with the brain; the
stalk soon, however, disappears, and the distal portion lies com-
pletely separated extracranially, its constituent cells undergoing
degeneration. Never at any period does it become developed
in any living Amphibian into an eye.
The word living is used and emphasised, because it is by
no means certain that the same remark can be applied to all
' «Comp. Embryology,’ vol. ii, p. 355.
224 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
the extensive group of extinct forms classed together as
Labyrinthodonta, and usually regarded as the extinct repre-
sentatives of the class Amphibia. On the contrary, one of
the most interesting features in the cranial skeleton of these
is the possession of an extremely well-marked and prominent
parietal foramen,! which is proportionately quite as large, and
in many cases larger, in comparison to the size of the skull
than in living Lacertilia.
There is no doubt that the presence of a parietal
foramen is intimately associated witha high state of
development of the epiphysis, and we are thus brought
without hesitation to the conclusion that, whilst amongst living
Amphibians the epiphysis is present only in a rudimentary and
degenerate condition, in extinct Amphibia (Labyrintho-
donta) the epiphysis was in a high state of spe-
cialisation. Further, the only group of living animals in
which, as before said, a parietal foramen is present, is Lacer-
tilia. Within this group, though various degenerate forms
are seen, yet, inasmuch as
The organ is found in genera of every family, ancient and recent alike (in
Hatteria, in Calotes, in Agama, in Moloch, in Anolis, in Iguana, in Anguis,
in Varanus, in Seps, in Lacerta), in which a foramen is developed ; whilst
again, in such as Gecko, Ameiva, and Ceratophora, where uo foramen persists,
the organ is absent,
It may be further said that the presence of a parietal
foramen, as a structure typical of the skulls of a
group of animals indicates the presence of a pineal
eye within that group.
It is quite true that in three forms described—Cyclodus,
Chameleo, and Lyriocephalus—the foramen is present,
and though the epiphysis is, in certain respects, highly deve-
loped in each case, the distal portion retaining its connection
with the brain roof, yet no true eye is formed. This, however,
need present no difficulty in the way of acceptance of the
above statement. Regarding the present families of Lacer-
1 See especially the drawings of Fritsch in‘ Fauna der Gaskoble und der
Kalkstein,’ Prag., 1885.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 225)
tilia as descendants of some common ancestor, we can come
to no other conclusion, inasmuch as the more primitive and
specialised forms agree at the present time in the possession of
a parietal foramen occupied by a pineal eye, and that this is,
further, a characteristic of the nearest allies of the forms
mentioned, than that the ancestral form possessed both these
structures, and that the condition seen in Chameleo, Cy-
clodus, and Lyriocephalus is not typical but secondary ;
they possess a parietal foramen simply because their ancestors
possessed a pineal eye, which in them is in a rudimentary con-
dition, as indeed the external modification in Cyclodus
(Pl. XV, fig. 9) seems to show in the case of this form in
particular. |
When, therefore, we find the parietal foramen exceedingly
well developed throughout all the group Labyrinthodonta,
we are justified in concluding that in them a pineal eye
was in all probability present, even though we may grant
the possibility (an unlikely one under the circumstances) of its
occasional presence, as in Lacertilia, in a low state of
development.
In living Reptilia the presence of the foramen is confined
to one group, but amongst the extinct forms, which may be
regarded as the ancestors of the Reptilia now living, whilst
some, at all events, may further be regarded as intimately
connected with the ancestors of living birds, we find that the
foramen is a well-developed structure. Judging from its
present condition in the relatively small Lacertilia of the
present day, we may imagine that in the huge extinct forms of
Mesozoic periods—in such as Ichthyosaurus and Plesio-
saurus, the walls of whose foramina even present rugosities
as if for the insertion of muscles—the pineal eye attained a
development and importance quite disproportionate to that
with which we are now acquainted in any living form.
1 T am indebted to Professor Moseley for calling my attention to the paper
upon “ The Brain of a Theromorphous Reptile of the Permian Epoch,” by Cope,
in which is figured a cast of the brain of one of the Diadectide. Perhaps
the most remarkable feature is the huge comparative size of the cavity within
226 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
The walls of the foramina are lifted above the level of the
parietal bones, and it is perfectly possible, if not certain, that
the organ itself, enclosed in the eye capsule, projected con-
siderably beyond the surface.
With the gradual extinction of these forms and of the
Deinosauria (i. e. Iguanodon, &c.), after the Cretaceous period
was passed, the organ, we may suppose, began with the rapidly
dwindling size of the specialised tertiary and later Reptilia and
Aves to lose its importance, until, degenerating in various de-
grees in different groups, it retained traces of its original eye-like
structure in the only groups in which, amongst living reptiles,
the parietal foramen persists ; its preservation being intimately
connected with and dependent upon the presence of this struc-
ture. The foramen is preserved amongst no group whatever
of existing Aves, and hence in these the epiphysis undergoes
considerable degeneration, though in its development it still
reaches a stage when, asin Reptilia, it consists of a distal
vesicle connected with the brain roof by a solid stalk.
In Mammalia the degeneration is far more complete, and
all trace of the ancestral importance is completely lost.
There now remains for consideration the two classes, Uro-
chorda and Cephalochorda; with regard to the latter it is
very difficult, if not impossible, to homologise any part of its
nervous system with the epiphysis of higher forms; the per-
sistent anterior neuropore described by Hatscheck may perhaps
be homologous with that of other forms of Chordata which
closes during development, though even this must be regarded
as extremely doubtful owing to its position considerably
posterior to the anterior end of the notochord ; neither can it
for the same region be considered the homologue of the epi-
physis, which again lies posterior to the neuropore. The
azygos pigment spot described as an “eye” has no apparent
the parietal foramen, presumably filled during life by the epiphysis. In addi-
tion to this, Professor Cope points out a large posterior process leading “back
towards the optic lobes and roof of the thalamencephalon, and which recent
work on living forms can scarcely leave room to doubt represents the flattened
pineal stalk.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 227
resemblance in position or structure to the pineal eye of
Lacertilia.
As figured by Langerhans! and Niisslin,? it is a pigment
spot within the walls of the neural canal, and lies anterior to
the part shown subsequently by Hatschek to be the anterior
neuropore ; whereas if it were the homologue of the azygos eye
of Tunicata it must lie posteriorly to this.
Turning to the Urochorda a structure is at once met with
which naturally suggests comparison with the pineal eye.
Yet, however tempting it may be to homologise the azygos
Tunicate eye with the latter, it cannot be too clearly pointed
out that the two organs differ fundamentally in
structure and position, and we have not the slightest
reason for supposing that the pineal eye is the direct repre-
sentative of the Tunicate eye. In the first place, the internal
position of the latter clearly distinguishes it from the pineal
eye; even supposing the tunicate organ to, in some way, undergo
evagination there still remains the difficulty that the retina cor-
responds in position to the part which after evagination would
give rise to the lens, whilst the latter structure is perfectly
distinct in nature and formation from that of the pineal eye.
The curious formation of the lens in Tunicates from the
union of two or more separate parts, differing in shape and quite
distinct from that of Lacertilia in their relationship to the
retina, is an important point of difference, and renders it quite
impossible, whatever may be the case with the retina, to homo-
logise the lens in the two forms. At the same time there is
considerable analogy between the two lenses, inasmuch as each
is formed directly out of the walls of the neural canal,
a point in which they at once agree with one another, and differ
from every other Vertebrate. Notwithstanding this it must, I
think, be admitted that the vesicular nature of the eye in
Lacertilia and the formation of the lens out of a portion of
the vesicle, constitutes a difference of fundamental importance
between the two eyes in their fully-developed condition.
1 « Arch. f. Mikr. Anat.,’ Bd. xii, Tf. 12, fig. 17.
2 «Zur Kritik des Amphioxusauges,’ Otto Nisslin, Tubingen, 1877.
228 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
Whilst it must be admitted that we are without evidence
sufficient to warrant us in regarding the pineal as the direct
representative of the azygos Tunicate eye, it is, perhaps,
worth suggesting that there may be some connection between
the larval eye of Tunicata and the epiphysis of higher
forms. It may be pointed out, first of all, that the position
of the eye and that of the rudiment of the epiphysis is the
same with regard to the anterior end of the notochord, both,
further, being situated on the dorsal surface of the “ brain,”
applying this term to the anterior vesicle of the neural canal
in Tunicata. It must, however, be also noticed that the eye
of the latter is placed not exactly medianly, but slightly to the
right side! There still remains the great difficulty of the
transformation of the internally placed eye into an external
hollow process of the brain roof.
According to Kowalewsky,’ the Tunicate eye first appears as
a thickening of the dorsal wall of the brain cavity, in
one particular portion the cells becoming cylin-
drical and much elongated, and pigment appearing at
theirinternalends. The refractive structures forming the
lens are produced subsequently, so that at first the eye is
merely a specially thickened part of the roof of the brain
cavity, and only at a later period appears to assume its dis-
tinctly internal position, bulging out into the cavity (ef. figs.
32, 34).
Turning now to the epiphysis, we find that it arises as a
hollow outgrowth from the brain roof, presenting, as a rule,
nothing comparable to the structure of the Tunicate eye. In
one form, however, amongst Amphibia, it is just possible
that we meet with an indication of a connection existing be-
tween the two. A further examination in other forms, par-
ticularly those of Pisces, might possibly reveal a similar
1 Ahlborn draws attention to the slightly asymmetrical position of the
epiphysis in Petromyzon, where it becomes, by secondary growth, united to
the left ganglion habenule ; but since the eye of Tunicates is on the right
side, it is difficult to imagine any connection between the two.
2 ‘Arch. f. Mikr. Anat.,’ Bd. vii, 1871, pl. xii, figs. 32 and 34.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 229
method of development; at any rate, without laying undue
stress upon the example to be quoted, it is worth while drawing
attention to it, inasmuch as it reveals to us the possible path
by which the epiphysis of higher forms has been developed out
of a structure similar to the larval Tunicate eye at an early
stage. De Graaf, in his recent memoir,' figures and describes
the development of the epiphysis in Bufo cinerea. His
figures are, unfortunately, not drawn with such regard to his-
tological detail as could be desired in the present instance, but,
so far as they go, they indicate the possible existence of a con-
nection between the epiphysis of Bufo and the azygos eye of
the embryo Tunicate. He shows the epiphysis as arising at
first as a thickening of the roof of the thalamence-
phalon, which soon assumes the form of a slight
hollow outgrowth. Onthe inner surface of the cells,
sharing in the thickening and subsequent outgrowth,
isa small but well-defined mass of pigment. This pig-
ment very soon entirely disappears, and a hollow process—the
epiphysis—is formed, which gradually increases in size, and
becomes differentiated into a vesicular distal portion and a
solid stalk, the former gradually becoming constricted off. Is
it not possible that in these phenomena we have an indication
of the change from the internally situated Tunicate eye into an
externally placed hollow process? As before said, the Tunicate
eye arises as a distinct thickening of the brain-roof, the cells
forming the thickened portion bearing pigment on their in-
ternal ends. Just the same phenomena are witnessed in the
case of the epiphysis of Bufo cinerea, but, instead of develop-
ing into an eye internally placed, the cells, whose external
ends already form a bulging on the outer surface, form into
a well-defined evagination, the internally placed pigment dis-
appears, and the epiphysis, as present in all the higher groups
of the Chordata, is developed.
Whether we are here presented with an epitome of the steps
passed through during transformation of the internally-placed
eye of a transparent organism into the externally-lying evagina-
1 Op. cit., pl. iii, figs. 22 and 23, p. 27.
230 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
tion of a creature whose skin has become opaque, and to whom
an eye within the brain has become useless, it would be ex-
tremely difficult to say with certainty;! it is, however, worth
while calling attention to the fact that the epiphysis in very
early stages in its development in Bufo cinerea resembles
the Tunicate eye before the appearance of refractive elements,
whilst subsequent loss of pigment and evagination transforms
it into the epiphysis of the adult.
If there be any truth in the above hypothesis it follows that
we must start with a form which may be regarded as the
common ancestor of present Tunicata and the higher Chor-
data; in this, which closely resembles an embryonic Tunicate,
certain cells of the dorsal wall of the neural cavity are
specially elongated and bear pigment at their internal ends,
just as in the embryo Tunicate eye and Anuran epiphysis.
From this point development leads in two directions—(1) to
the highly developed internal eye of present Tunicata with
its secondarily developed refractive structures, and (2) by
evagination and loss of pigment to the epiphysis of higher
Chordata. Subsequent differentiation in the latter results
in the formation of a distal vesicle united to the brain roof by
a stalk, at first hollow and afterwards solid, whilst finally the
distal vesicle becomes modified into the pineal eye.
The evolution of the epiphysisis represented diagrammatically
1 Tt will be seen that this differs from the suggestion of Professor Lankester
that the internal eye of Tunicates by evagination forms the Vertebrate eye.
In the first place I suppose the evagination to give rise to the epiphysis,
subsequent differentiation of the distal vesicle of which gives origin to the
pineal eye. Secondly, I assume the development of the Tunicate eye and the
epiphysis out of an ancestral form common to Tunicata and the higher
Chordata, development taking place along two different lines and being possibly
connected with the transparency of the one and the opacity of the other form.
At the same time it may be pointed out that it is possible that the paired eyes
may be formed by evagination of paired internal eyes similar to the one which
becomes transformed into the epiphysis. The vesicles giving rise to the
paired and pineal eyes are precisely similar to each other, and may have
originated in the same way, the two types of eyes being aoe the result of
the es of secondary structures.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. Folk
in the figures on Pl. XX, which show the various stages passed
through before the highest form of development is reached,
and also the various forms as the result of degeneration. Each
stage save the earliest ones (1, 2, and 3) which are found in
the development of Tunicata and Bufo cinerea, represent
the permanent condition of the epiphysis in some living form.
The question now arises, is it possible to determine at what
period or rather within what group of animals the distal vesicle
first became differentiated into a pineal eye. There must
clearly have been a period during which the hollow epiphysial
evagination was not functioning as an eye, precisely in the
same way in which the primary optic vesicles must have existed
as hollow outgrowths of the brain before they, in like manner,
were differentiated into optic organs ; in fact, the three distinct
stages of (1), a hollow bladder-like evagination (fig. 4) ; of (2),
a distal vesicle connected by a hollow stalk (fig. 5) to the
brain ; of (3), a vesicle connected with a solid stalk (fig. 6),
must necessarily all have intervened before the final stage
(fig. 7) wasreached. When in any particular form we find one
of these three stages are we to assume that in that given form,
and hence in the closely allied members of the same group, the
epiphysis has never in its philogenetic history reached a higher
stage of development than the one in which it is now present ?
Suppose, for example, that we find an animal in which the
epiphysis has the form represented in fig. 5, must we take it
for granted that in that animal and its ancestors no higher
stage of differentiation has ever been reached. Taking the
animals in which this particular stage is permanent, we find
that they include certain Elasmobranchs together with
Cyclodus gigas amongst Lacertilia. Now we have clear
evidence that, in the forms from which we must suppose
Cyclodus in common with all other lizards to be descended,
as well as in its nearest living allies, the epiphysis is developed
into a pineal eye. To what conclusion must we come in the
case of Elasmobranchs; certainly the non-development of
a pineal eye in living examples is no proof whatever that such
a structure was not present in its ancestors. It must at once
252 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
be granted that an Elasmobranch, such as Raja or Acan-
thias, differs from Cyclodus inasmuch as none of its living
allies have the organ more highly developed, whilst in forms
allied to Cyclodus it isin a high state of development; yet
even this is by no means of so great importance, as to make us
conclude that living forms present us with the highest stage
yet reached in Elasmobranchs. If we turn to the Am-
phibia we finda group of animals amongst whom in no living
form is there a pineal eye present, and yet we may feel per-
fectly sure that in the great group of extinct Amphibia
(Labyrinthodonta) one was not only present but most probably
developed to its highest pomt. It must be admitted that we
have at present no direct evidence of the existence of pineal
eye within the group Pisces : until our knowledge is far greater
with regard to the development of the structure in, more
especially Dipnoi and Ganoidei, it will be impossible to
determine the question of the presence or absence of the
structure within the group. Meanwhile, the varied state of
development seen in such forms as Petromyzon on the one
hand, and Acanthias, Raja, and Scyllium on the other,
may perhaps be taken as evidence tending in favour of the
view that in its present form the organ is rudimentary. All
that may now be rightly insisted upon is that the absence of
the eye in living forms, either of this or of any other class, is
no proof that one has not been present at some period in the
phylogenetic history of the group.
The conclusions, finally, to which we are brought are the
following :
(1) Our present knowledge is not great enough to
allow us, in Amphioxus, to homologise any structure
either with the Tunicate azygos eye or with the
epiphysis.
(2) The epiphysis of higher Chordata is the homo-
logue of the larval Tunicate eye.
(3) The pineal eye is produced as a secondary
differentiation of the distal part of the epiphysis.
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 233
(4) There is not sufficient evidence to prove or
disprove the existence of the organ within the
group Pisces; it was present in extinct Amphibia,
and is found amongst living forms only in Lacertilia.
(5) In all forms at present existing it is in a
rudimentary state, and though its structure is
better developed in some than in others, it is per-
fectly functional in none.
(6) It was present most highly developed in
(1) Extinct Amphibia (Labyrinthodonta), and
(2) The large group of extinct forms (as Ich-
thyosaurus, Plesiosaurus, Iguanodon, &c.) which
may be regarded as ancestors alike of living
Reptilia and Aves.
(7) The pineal eye may probably be most rightly
considered, as peculiarly a sense organ of pre-Ter-
tiary periods.
234 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
EXPLANATION OF PLATES XIV, XV, XVI, XVII,
XVIII, XIX, & XX,
Illustrating Mr. Baldwin Spencer’s Paper on “ The Presence
and Structure of the Pineal Eye in Lacertilia.”
List of Reference Letters.
Ant. (Le). Cells of anterior wall of distal vesicle of epiphysis. C. Cilia of
cells lining epiphysis. Ca. Capsule of connective tissue enclosing the pineal
eye. Car. Cartilage within skull in Hatteria. Cd. Cerebellum. C. H. Cere-
bral hemispheres. Co, Cone-shaped bodies of pineal eye. Co. Modified
cone-shaped bodies lying near the pineal stalk. Cor. Cornea. C¢#., Ct.!, Ct.2,
Ct3, Ct.4, Ct.°, Ct. Connective tissue in various positions in connection with
the parietal foramen and pineal eye. Ct. pig. Pigment in the cutis vera.
Cut. Cuticle. De. Dermis. D. M. Dura mater. Hp. Hpidermis. Lp., Ep.!
Epiphysis. Zp. 1. Swollen distal end of epiphysis. £p.! (ops.) Portion of
epiphysis equivalent to the pineal stalk. Hum. Humour of eye. Inf. Infun-
dibulum. Ze. Lens. Md. Medulla oblongata. Mes. Mesencephalon. Mo.
Molecular layer of eye. WV. Nuclei of cells of epiphysis walls. V.}, 2.1 In-
ternal row of nuclei in retina. .?, V.? External row of nuclei in retina.
n> Specialised nucleated elements in pineal stalk of Hatteria. ze. Nerve-
fibres. WV. ct. Nuclei of connective tissue. O// Olfactory nerve. Op., Op. v.
Optic vesicle. Op. S. Pineal stalk. Op. L. Optic lobe of brain. Pa. for.
Parietal foramen. Pa., Par. Parietal bones. Post. (R.) Cells of posterior
wall of swollen end of epiphysis in Cyclodus. pig., pig.', pig.?, pig.3, pig.t
Pigment developed in various positions in connection with the eye. Proc.
Processes uniting various retinal elements in Varanus. Ae. Retina of pineal
eye. &.,7. Rods of retina. £.! Specialised rods in connection with entrance
of nerve-fibres. &. Mp. Rete mucosum. SS. Spindle-shaped elements of
retina. hl., Th. 3rd vent. Thalamencephalon and 3rd ventricle. Vent.3 3rd
ventricle.
PLATE XIV.
Fic. 1.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of
Varanus giganteus. The right side lies posteriorly, the left anteriorly,
and the parietal bone enclosing the foramen is shaded yellow. The connective
tissue is seen forming a dome to the foramen and filling up the latter. The
pineal eye is cut through in the median line, showing the lens with its special
development of pigment in the optic axis and the retina with the elongated
rods where the nerves enter the vesicle. The nerves are three in number, two
PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 235
joining into one and the two main strands then uniting to form the solid pineal
stalk. The large blood-vessel accompanying the stalk enters the foramen,
together with the latter.
Fic. 2.—Longitudinal vertical section through the connective tissue capsule
containing the pineal eye of Hatteria punctata. The right side is the
anterior, the left the posterior, the external surface of the head being parallel
to the breadth of the plate. The capsule is formed anteriorly by the con-
nective tissue filling up the parietal foramen. Into the capsule passes a
blood-vessel, which ramifies amongst loosely scattered connective-tissue fibres.
The anterior part of the capsule is comparatively empty, but special fibres
pass from the walls to the sides of the lens. The optic vesicle is cut through
in the median line, showing the cone-shaped lens and the elements of the retina
together with the pineal stalk entering posteriorly.
Fic. 3.—Section through the retina of Hatteria punctata. The left is
the internal, the right the external surface. Internally the shade indicates
the fluid within the vesicle, bounding the cavity of which are the rods lying
in pigment. External to the rods lie the inner spherical-shaped elements,
then the molecular layer, and external to the latter larger spherical bodies
together with conical and spindle-shaped bodies, the latter two being in con-
nection with nerve-fibres. (In the figure the nerve-layer has been drawn so
as to appear more prominent than it is in reality.)
Fig. 4.—Section through the portion where the pineal stalk enters the walls
of the vesicle. The specialised bundle of rods lying in the optic axis, with
the nuclei in connection with them, are seen together with the retinal elements
around the entrance of the nerve-fibres of the stalk. The fibres run round
in front of the capsular-like structure which contains the specialised nucleated
elements, sending some to these on either side, the remainder passing on and
either (1) entering into connection with the elements nearest to the pineal
stalk, or (2) passing farther on to form a layer of nerve-fibres on the external
surface of the vesicle.
Fig. 5.—Separated rods from the retina of the pineal eye of Hatteria
punctata. The pigment is so deposited as to produce the effect of
striations.
Kic. 6.—Section through the retina of Varanus giganteus. The rods
lie embedded in pigment on the internal surface, passing into the cavity of
the vesicle; the shade on the left indicates the humour within the latter. The
reticular nature of the retina external to the rods is seen, the nuclei of the
spherical elements being coloured red. The internal spherical elements are
situated within the molecular layer; amongst the external ones are large
masses of pigment; more external still is a thin layer of nerve-fibres, and
outside this the connective-tissue fibres enclosing the optic vesicle.
VOL. XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER. K
236 W. BALDWIN SPENCER.
PLATE XV.
Fic, 7.—Longitudinal vertical section through the median line of the head
in Hatteria punctata in the region of the parietal foramen. ‘The relative
positions of the epiphysis, the pineal stalk, and pineal eye, are seen together
with the plug of connective tissue filling up the foramen. In front of the
epiphysis is the vascular roof of the thalamencephalon.
Fic. 8.—Diagrammatic side view of the brain of Hatteria punctata.
The brain is lying in its cartilaginous case. From the thalamencephalon
between the cerebral hemispheres and the optic lobes arises the epiphysis,
which at first running almost directly upward, turns forwards on reaching the
cartilaginous roof as far as the parietal foramen, where the pineal stalk pierces
the cartilage and enters the optic vesicle, which is seen lying in its capsule.
Fic. 9.—External view of the modified eye-scale of Cyclodus, showing
the modification to form a cornea.
Fic. 10.—External view of the scales in the median line of the head of
Varanus giganteus, showing the scale modified as a cornea.
Fic. 11.—The pineal eye of Anolis (sp.?) removed, together with the
brain membranes, and viewed as a solid object by transmitted light.
Fic. 12.—The pineal eye of a small specimen of Varanus bengalensis,
ying within the parietal foramen and viewed from the under surface.
Fic. 13.—The modified eye-scale of a small Calotes (sp. ?), with the trans-
parent cornea in the middle through which the eye is seen.
Fic. 14.—The pineal eye of the same Calotes, whose scale is figured in
Fig. 13, removed with the dura mater and viewed as a solid object.
Fie. 15.—Scales from median line on head of a large specimen of Iguana
tuberculata, showing the modified eye-scale with cornea.
Fic. 16.—Modified eye-scale of a young Iguana, showing the transparent
central portion with the eye beneath as a dark spot.
PLATE XVI.
Fie. 17.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of
Varanus bengalensis, showing the pineal eve and the hollow epiphysial
stalk immediately beneath. The yellow shade indicates bone. p.! Hollow
epiphysial stalk.
Fie. 18.—J.ongitudinal vertical section through the distal part of the
epiphysis of Cyclodus, showing the swollen extremity and the hollow epi-
physial stalk connecting this with the brain. Zp. 1. Swollen extremity,
Ep. Epiphysial stalk,
PINEAL EYE IN LACEHRTILIA. 237
Fic. 19.—Section through a part of the upper wall of the swollen extremity
of the epiphysis in Cyclodus. @. Cilia of cells bounding the cavity of the
epiphysis. Aut. (Le) The elongate cells, equivalent to those forming the
lens of the parietal eye in other forms. . Oval nuclei of the cells.
Ftc. 20.—Section through portion of the under wall of the same. Post. (2.)
Ends of the cells facing into the cavity in the position of the rods of other
forms. . Circular nuclei of the cells.
Fie, 21.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of
Chameleo vulgaris, showing the optic vesicle, pineal stalk, and epiphysis.
The yellow shade indicates the parietal bone.
PLATE XVII.
Fie. 22.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen and
pineal eye of Leiodera nitida. The great elongation of the cells of the
rete mucosum is drawn, and the entire absence of pigment from the cutis vera
above the eye indicated.
Fig. 23.—Pineal eye of Iguana tuberculata, cut in section and re-
moved from the parietal foramen. When in position the optic axis looks
directly upwards.
Fic. 24.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of
Anolis (sp.?), showing the pineal eye lying within the vacuolate tissue, to-
gether with the pineal stalk.
Fic. 25.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of
Anguis fragilis, showing the pineal eye separated from the proximal portion
of the epiphysis and the forward extension of the latter.
Fic. 26.—The eye of Lacerta viridis, viewed as a solid object lying
within the parietal foramen.
PLATE XVIII.
Fic. 27.—The pineal eye of Lacerta ocellata, viewed as a solid object
lying within the parietal foramen, one half of which has beencut away. The
eye lies within a mass of branched pigment cells, amongst which ramify the
branches of the blood-vessel which accompanies the pineal stalk.
Fic. 28.—The brain of Lacerta ocellata, with the pineal eye lying in
the dura mater, viewed from the side.
Fie. 29.—The brain of Cyclodus gigas, viewed from the side, with the
epiphysis stretching forwards and upwards and ending in a swollen part within
the parietal foramen surrounded by pigment. (The foramen should not be
closed above.)
238 W. BALDWIN SPENCER,
Fic. 30.—Longitudinal vertical section through the pineal eye of Lacerta
ocellata, showing the double nature of the nerve.
Fic. 31.—Diagrammatic longitudinal vertical section through the brain of
Calotes ophiomaca, to show the pineal eye lying within the parietal
foramen and its relationship to the epiphysis, and of this to the brain.
Fig. 32.—Longitudinal vertical section through the pineal eye of Seps
chalcidica, showing its relationship to the foramen and its surrounding of
deep pigment.
Fic. 33.—Longitudinal vertical section through the pineal eye of Calotes
ophiomaca, showing its meltionsp to the parietal foramen and the blood-
vessel within the latter.
PLATE XIX.
Fic. 34.—Diagrammatic longitudinal vertical section through the parietal
foramen of Varanus giganteus, showing the eye within the parietal fora-
men and the pineal stalk.
Fig. 35.—Diagrammatic longitudinal vertical section through the median
line of the brain of Plica umbra, to show the eye and its relationship to
the pineal stalk and epiphysis.
Fig. 36.—Diagrammatic side view of the brain and pineal eye of Moloch
horridus, viewed as a solid object, the eye lying within the parietal foramen.
Fic. 37.—Modified median eye-scale of a small Varanus bengalensis.
Fic. 38.—Modified median eye-scale of Leiodera nitida.
Fre. 39.—Modified median eye-scale of Agama hispida.
Fic. 40.—Diagrammatic longitudinal vertical section through the brain of
Chameleo vulgaris, to show the distal vesicle with the pineal stalk.
Fic. 41,—Diagrammatic longitudinal vertical section through the brain of
Varanus bengalensis, showing the eye lying in the parietal foramen, and
the pineal stalk with its swollen extremity beneath the eye.
PLATE XX.
Diagram illustrating the development of the epiphysis from an internally
placed eye in the “brain” of an ancestor common to Tunicata and higher
Chordata. Figs. 1—7 illustrate the evolution of the organ till its highest
stage of development is reached. Figs. 2 and 3 are diagrammatised from
those of two stages in the development of the epiphysis in Bufo cinerea,
as given by de Graaf. Fig. 1 represents an early stage of development, accord-
ing to Kowalevsky, in Tunicates, before the formation of a lens. In higher
Chordata loss of pigment and evagination produce the epiphysis, which may
in various forms reach different stages shown in the figures. The cross-line
shading indicates the parietal bone. Figs. 9—12 representing various stages
of degeneration in forms in which the parietal foramen becomes closed. Alk
the figures are, of course, perfectly diagrammatical.
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 239
On the Life-History of Pedicellina.
By
Sidney F. Harmer, B.A., B.Sc.,
Fellow of King’s College, Cambridge, and of University College, London.
With Plates XXI aud XXII.
Durine the summer of 1885, spent in Rocquaine Bay,
Guernsey, I succeeded in obtaining material for the study of
the metamorphosis of Pedicellina echinata, a form which
occurs in great abundance (in Rocquaine Bay) on Coralline
growing under the shade of other seaweeds in tide-pools.
The larve of Pedicellina invariably refused to fix them-
selves when kept in a small quantity of water, and I therefore
ultimately adopted the following method for procuring the
various stages necessary for the investigation.
Adult colonies were placed, after the removal of all super-
fluous parts of the Coralline on which they were growing, in a
small vessel, the mouth of which was closed by a piece of linen.
The vessel was then left for a day or more in a tide-pool, after
which a careful search (with the aid of a low power) over the
Coralline was generally rewarded by the discovery of several
young Pedicellina, which had resulted from larve hatched in
the tide-pool, and which, owing to their inability to escape
from the vessel in which they were confined, had been obliged
to fix on the Coralline. After preservation with corrosive
sublimate and decalcification of the Alga, sections were easily
prepared. In this manner, I succeeded in obtaining numerous
individuals of various ages, fixed under perfectly normal con-
ditions.
240 SIDNEY F. HARMER.
My study of the metamorphosis of Pedicellina has led me
in the main to a complete confirmation of the account already
given by Barrois (No. 3), and summarized on pp. 312 and 313
of my previous paper on Loxosoma (No. 4), where I have
ventured on a criticism of Barrois’ conclusions which I do not
find to be justified by my own investigation of the subject.
In opposition to my previous opinion, I must now conclude
that the post-larval changes consist in a remarkable metamor-
phosis, and that the first bud is formed after the primary
individual has acquired its adult characters. Barrois has
published no figures illustrative of his statements, the actual
details of the process being difficult to understand from his
very short description, whilst the morphological nature of the
changes remains entirely obscure. The subject appears to me,
therefore, to deserve further consideration.
The structure of the larva is well known from the researches
of Hatschek,' and it will be unnecessary to describe it in more
than a few of its details.
In the swimming attitude of the larva, the ciliated ring is
everted to the exterior, whilst from the oral face project two
prominent structures ;—the epistome, with its tuft of long cilia,
and the anal cone, on which opens the anus. During the re-
tracted condition, however, the ciliated ring is reflected to the
interior of the large vestibular cavity, whose outer walls are
formed by the fold of skin which bears the ciliated ring itself
(cf. Pl. XXI, fig. 1). The floor of the vestibule is constituted
by the ventral or oral surface of the larva, being specially de-
pressed between the base of the epistome and the anal cone,
and at the sides of the latter.
As Barrois has correctly stated, fixation takes place by the
oral surface, the larva being meanwhile in its ‘‘retracted” condi-
tion. Pl. XXI, fig. 1, a median longitudinal section, will
serve to illustrate the method of fixation. It will be noticed
that the long axis of the stomach is approximately parallel
to the surface of attachment.
1 Vide the summary of Hatschek’s results in Balfour, ‘ Comp. Emb..,’ vol.
i, pp. 242—246.
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 241
Fig. 3 represents a horizontal section of a larva not long
after its fixation: the occurrence of brain (= “ dorsal organ,”
v. No. 4), cesophagus, and rectum in the figure sufficiently de-
fines the level of the section. The epistome is cut in the region
of its greatest thickness, whilst at the summit of the anal
cone is seen the depression into which opens the anus. By
comparing this with fig. 1, it will be observed that the anus
has already altered its position, since it is now directed some-
what forwards, the rectum being more nearly parallel to the
stomach than before. The cells of the vestibular epithelium
are very high at the sides of the anal cone, and are character-
ized by the special readiness with which they take up colouring
matters.
Fig. 5 represents a horizontal section through the apices of
the epistome and anal cone of another individual of the same
age. The epistome is here seen to be continuous, at each side,
with a fold of vestibular epithelium; epistome and folds
together forming (as seen in this section) a horseshoe-shaped
ridge partially embracing the sides of the anal cone, in which
region the two lateral folds become evanescent. The result of
this arrangement is the formation of a somewhat deep ciliated
groove (0.g.) running round the greater part of the vestibule,
and passing in front into the transversely elongated, funnel-
shaped mouth. Posteriorly, however, owing to the disappear-
ance of the lateral folds, the oral grooves fade away at the
sides of the anus, where vestibule and oral grooves conse-
quently appear continuous in such a section as that represented
in fig. 5. The relations of these structures will become more
clear on reference to fig. 4, a larva somewhat older than those
previously described, the section passing transversely through
the region of the anal cone, in the plane a B in fig. 1. At the
sides of the anal cone are the two lateral portions of the vesti-
bule (J. v.), these structures being separated from the oral
grooves by the folds already mentioned. Inthe more anterior
sections of the series, the lateral folds become continuous with
the epistome, and the oral grooves with the mouth. Further
back, on the contrary, the folds become lower, and finally dis-
242 SIDNEY F. HARMEK.
appear, so that the oral grooves are not distinguishable in the
post-anal region of the vestibule. The above description,
together with a reference to fig. 5, will thus show that the deep
post-anal groove (m.v.) of fig. 1 is continuous equally with the
oral grooves and with the general vestibular cavity. For
further clearness, dotted lines in the same figure indicate the
position and relations of the right lateral fold as it would appear
by looking at the wall of the vestibule from the inside of the
latter. The relations of half of the ciliated ring and of the
right oral groove are also shown in the figure.
. Fig. 2 represents a longitudinal section of a recently-fixed
larva, passing in the direction of the line cp in figs. 3 and 4.
One of the lateral folds, owing to its projection inwards into
the vestibule, separates the latter into two portions, containing
respectively the mouth (and oral groove) and part of the epis-
tome. The latter portion obviously corresponds to one of the
lateral regions of the vestibule (/. v.) in fig. 3. Fig. 2 further
explains the continuity of the tip of the epistome with the
lateral folds (cf. figs. 1 and 5). In more median sections of
the same series the latter are not seen, the epistome being per-
fectly free at its apex, whilst the separation of the vestibular
cavity into two parts is not apparent.
A considerable portion of the base of the epistome and of
the sides of the anal cone is formed of a remarkable tissue,
composed of large cells, with transparent contents, hardly
staining with colouring matters (fig. 2, 7). The nature of
this tissue (which atrophies during the metamorphosis) is
unknown to me.
The revolution (about to be described) of the alimentary
canal was obviously well understood by Barrois, although I
did not formerly succeed in making out his exceedingly con-
cise statements on this head.
Figs. 8 and 9 represent two sections of an obliquely longitu-
dinal series through a more advanced stage. Fig. 9 involves
the rectum, whilst fig. 8 shows the mouth and cesophagus. In
the latter figure is seen one of the deep portions of the vesti-
bule lying at the sides of the rectum, which is itself of course
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 243
not visible. The dorsal organ and the sucker have both dege-
nerated, and are represented merely by the “ globules” de-
scribed by Barrois in various parts of the larva after its
metamorphosis. These ‘ globules” are rounded nucleated
cells, which do not stain readily with reagents, their general
form being shown in fig. 8, &c.
It is obvious, from an inspection of the two sections figured,
that the stomach has now taken up a position inclined to the
surface of attachment, the concavity of the alimentary canal
being directed somewhat backwards.
Remarkable changes, already described in part by Barrois,
have by this time occurred.!
Fig. 9 shows that the aperture of the vestibule has closed,
so that this cavity has no longer any communication with the
exterior. The vestibule is partially divided into three por-
tions, which do not, however, quite correspond with those
described by Barrois. The most ventral portion (v. v. in
fig. 9) corresponds to the region near the previous vestibular
aperture, and is destined to atrophy completely. The next
portion (v. or.) is in connection with the mouth (fig. 8), whilst
the most dorsal portion (v. an.) contains the anal cone, and is
at this stage and later the largest and most important part of
the vestibule. The second or oral division still communicates
with the ventral portion, whilst it is almost separated from the
dorsal or anal division by the growth of the epistome and of
the lateral folds.
In another section of the series it is seen that the oral and
anal divisions of the vestibule still communicate by a small
aperture, as in the diagram, fig. 16 (a. v. v.).
The anal portion of the vestibule is very large, and is grow-
ing, at the previously posterior end of the larva, away from
the surface of attachment. The cells lining this part of the
vestibule are obviously engaged in active growth and multi-
1 The following statements will be more readily understood with the
assistance of Pl. XXII, fig. 16, representing in a diagrammatic form a
median longitudinal section through an individual of the same age as figs.
8 and 9,
244, SIDNEY F. HARMER.
plication, their protoplasm being finely granular and staining
readily with colouring matters. The backward growth of the
vestibule occurs first in the regions at the two sides of the anal
cone (cf. fig. 3), but soon extends to the median portion be-
hind the cone (fig. 9), so that this part of the vestibule grows
towards the free end of the fixed larva, during the rotation of
the alimentary canal, as a single actively extending diverticu-
lum, in which the primary differentiation of median and lateral
regions is no longer marked.
Fig. 6 will serve to explain more clearly the relations of the
oral grooves and neighbouring structures at a stage very slightly
earlier than that of figs. 8 and 9. The section passes in a direc-
tion corresponding to the line xk L in fig. 16, and consequently
involves the apex of the epistome, the lateral folds, and the
oral grooves. The anal cone, visible in fig. 5, is, of course, not
involved by the section, which in other respects differs from the
former figure mainly in the facts that the diameter of this por-
tion of the vestibule has become lessened, and that by the par-
tial rotation of the alimentary canal the apex of the epistome
has come nearly into contact with the posterior wall of the
vestibule (the manner in which this happens will be understood
by comparing fig. 1 with fig. 16), the form of the lateral folds
being at the same time altered (cf. fig. 6 with fig. 5). By this
change of position of epistome and lateral folds, the oral and
anal sections of the vestibule communicate merely by a com-
paratively small round aperture. The oral grooves are no
longer continuous posteriorly with the anal portion of the
vestibule, although on the left side of the section at least, a trace
of the former continuity is distinguishable. During later stages
the growth of epistome and lateral folds completely separates
the oral from the anal division of the vestibule, the aperture
a.v.v. in fig. 6 being gradually constricted until it finally
disappears.
At the stage of figs. 8 and 9 a considerable amount of his-
tolysis is taking place. This process affects specially the
stomach, the epistome, the anal cone, and the ventral portion
of the vestibule. In the case of the stomach, portions of the
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 245
epithelial cells and some of their nuclei pass bodily into the
lumen of the organ (cf. figs. 8 and 9), where they are found
quite free at later stages. The more projecting parts of the
epistome and of the anal cone lose most of their component
cells. The cilia of the latter become indistinct, the cell-sub-
stance itself obviously degenerating (fig. 9). Ultimately ciliated
portions of the cells are thrown off into the vestibule (figs. 9
and 12), in which they can be discovered until a very late stage
in the metamorphosis. They no doubt leave the vestibule
either by the mouth or by the (adult) vestibular aperture,
when the latter is formed.
The histolysis of the ventral portion of the vestibule (fig. 9,
v. v.) similarly results in the passage of fragments of cells into
its own cavity.
This process is again illustrated by fig. 12, a section passing
in the plane of the line EF in fig. 9. The permanent vestibule
is in this section (cf. fig. 16) completely separated from the
degenerating portion, its lumen, like that of the latter, con-
taining fragments of degenerating cells.
The ventral division of the vestibule (v. v.) in fig. 9 occupies
the position of the future stalk, and in later stages its cavity
becomes more and more reduced until it finally atrophies.
During this process, the cells previously found in its lumen
disappear. In sections parallel to the plane of attachment the
cavity (just before its atrophy) appears as a fine tube surrounded
by a series of elongated cells radiating from it towards the
body wall. It is very tempting to assume that these cells are
phagocytes, engaged in the destruction of the vestrbule. After
the atrophy of the latter, its place is occupied by numerous
“ globules” (fig. 10), which will themselves be replaced by
ordinary connective-tissue corpuscles (fig. 13).
The same assertion may be made of other parts of the
“primary body cavity,” which is at the stage of fig. 9 almost
completely filled with “ globules,” resulting from the histolysis
of the brain, the sucker, the tissue at the base of the epistome
and anal cone, and other larval structures. When the primary
individual is mature the ‘‘ globules” have disappeared, and are
246 SIDNEY F. HARMER.
replaced by a gelatinous matrix, in which lie connective-tissue
corpuscles. Are we not justified im assuming that the
“ slobules” are the active agents in the histolysis, and that
they are in fact typical phagocytes ?
During the histolysis of portions of the anal cone, the latter
structure itself becomes much depressed. This feature of the
metamorphosis, although already obvious in fig. 9, may be
further illustrated by means of fig. 7, a section passing in a
plane corresponding to the line 1 g in fig. 16.
Owing to the further depression (occurring at a slightly later
stage) of the anal cone, the marked bilateral arrangement of
this part of the vestibule is, in part at least, lost. At the stage
of figs. 8 and 9, as cau be easily seen from these figures them-
selves, the posterior portion of the vestibule is no longer re-
duced in the median plane to a small slit between anal cone
and vestibular wall (as in fig. 1), but is, in this position also,
a spacious cavity lined by a columnar epithelium (fig. 9).
After the anal cone has reached the condition of the latter
figure the vestibule, in sections parallel to the long axis of the
stomach, will usually appear bounded posteriorly by a simple
uniformly curved wall, whilst its oesophageal side is floored by
the degenerating tissue of the epistome (fig. 7). In later
stages, however, the well-developed epithelium of the sides of
the vestibule extends inwards, so that the cavity is then en-
tirely bounded by its permanent, partially regenerated epi-
thelium.
In the next stage represented very considerable changes
have occurred, whereby the alimentary canal has taken up a
position not unlike that which it will ultimately retain.
Fig. 10 represents an actual section which passes in the median
longitudinal plane of a larva at this stage. Whereas in
fig. 16 the axis of the stomach is but slightly inclined to the
surface of attachment, in the present instance it has assumed
a position almost at right angles to this plane, and the con-
cavity of the gut is now directed towards the primitively pos-
terior end of the fixed larva. In the course of this rotation
of the alimentary canal the vestibule, owing to atrophy of one
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDIOELLINA. 247
at least of the portions described in the last stage, has become
somewhat simplified. All the more ventral regions (situ-
ated in the neighbourhood of the surface of attachment) have
completely disappeared, and in their place is found a mass of
cells filling a cylindrical stalk, which obviously corresponds to
that of the adult Pedicellina. The anal division of the ves-
tibule has continued its backward growth and now lies almost
at the free end of the young animal. At about this stage it
acquires a secondary opening to the exterior on the side corre-
sponding to the posterior surface of the larva. This opening
is formed by a simple concrescence between the vestibular
epithelium and the external ectoderm of the body, accompa-
nied by a linear perforation formed at the point of junction
of these two distinct portions of ectoderm. My sections have
given me no indication of the occurrence of a ‘labial invagi-
nation” (Barrois, q. v.) placing the above portion of the ves-
tibule in connection with the exterior.
The character of the vestibular aperture, immediately after
its formation, may be seen from fig. 1], a section passing in a
plane corresponding to cH 1n fig. 10. The vestibular aperture,
at the sides of which tentacles (¢.) are already developing, is
shown, by an examination of the remaining sections of the
series, to have the form of a slit elongated in the direction of
the median plane of the animal. Immediately before the for-
mation of the aperture the vestibular epithelium would appear,
in a section of this kind, quite unconnected with the external
ectoderm, but already extending towards it in the form of a
median groove, similar in appearance to the portion gy. v. in
fig Ll:
The mouth in fig. 10 has, at first sight, the appearance of
being closed. By a comparison, however, of fig. 10 with
fig. 16, it would seem that the apex of the epistome is really
represented (in the former) by the ectoderm closing the (per-
manent) mouth, and it is thus probable that the commence-
ment of the digestive tube in fig. 10 (v. or.) is a part of the
oral division of the vestibule. This impression is strongly
confirmed by a section (uot figured) similar to, but later than,
248 SIDNEY F. HARMER.
fig. 9. In the individual referred to, the stalk portion of the
vestibule is still present, but is small, and is connected with
the cesophagus very much as in the diagram fig. 16; i.e. at
some distance from the point where the apex of the epistome
ultimately meets the vestibular wall.
In somewhat later stages the permanent mouth is formed by
the perforation of the septum between the two portions of the
vestibule in fig. 10, and probably in the position of the aper-
ture a. v. v. in fig. 16.
In living individuals of the same age could usually be dis-
covered a small projection of the surface of the body in the
region marked ?s. in fig. 10. This represents the larval
“sucker,” which, as Barrois has correctly stated, disappears
during the metamorphosis. The region of the “ dorsal organ”
or brain of the larva is doubtless indicated by the marked angle
on the left side of the stalk of the individual just referred to.
None of the previous histological peculiarities of the organ re-
main at this stage, and it is in fact already almost impossible to
distinguish with certainty its position.
It appears to me that Barrois has suggested the real expla-
nation of the metamorphosis of Pedicellina, although he has
confined himself to one or two short statements, which are
given without any indication of the manner in which they are
to be interpreted. I quote below one or two passages from
Barrois’ note so many times referred to (3), the given quota-
tions reproducing, so far as I am aware, the whole of Barrois’
explanation of this complicated subject.
(i) ‘La premiére position” [corresponding, from the de-
scription, with my own fig. 10] “représente un état tout a
fait analogue au Loxosoma, avec anus en haut et csophage
en bas.”
(ii) “ L’inférieure”? [portion du vestibule] ‘‘ qui porte la
couronne, et dont les éléments viennent former la glande du
pied.”
(iii) “‘ Les deux organes énigmatiques de l’exoderme”’ [i. e.
sucker and dorsal organ] . . . . “ne sont, suivant moi, que
des organes provisoires; tous deux sont rejetés sur la face
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 249
dorsale, ov ils finissent par disparaitre, peu a peu. Sans doute
il faut voir, dans les deux soies décrites par Salensky sur la
face dorsale du Loxosoma crassicauda, le reste de l’organe
des sens antérieur”’ [i. e. the dorsal organ] “ qui, d’apres mes
recherches, vient occuper cette place.”
I have already (4) explained my reasons for the belief that
the dorsal organ at any rate, and perhaps the sucker, are im-
portant organs, which throw considerable light upon the mor
phology of the Polyzoa, so that I cannot accept Barrois’ con-
clusion that these structures have no particular significance.
It is obvious that, however accurate Barrois’ conclusions
(quoted above) may be, they need further explanation. The
similarity between larva and adult in the Entoprocta, even
in the position of the buds in Loxosoma, is so striking that
some means of comparing the two stages is necessary. I
therefore suggest the following explanation of the relation
between larva and adult.
It does not seem to me that Caldwell’s theory of the sur-
faces of the Polyzoa receives any support from the metamor-
phosis of Pedicellina. The short line between mouth and
anus remains unchanged throughout the metamorphosis, and
in order to prove that it is not ventral, it still remains neces-
sary to show that the dorsal organ of the larva is not a brain,
and that the larval surfaces do not correspond with those of a
Trochosphere.
Figs. 17—19 (Pl. XXII) are diagrams representing a pos-
sible explanation of the metamorphosis of the Entoprocta,
but although founded on the history of Pedicellina, Loxo-
soma is the form which is actually (hypothetically) repre-
sented.
Fig. 17 explains a possible conception of one of the earlier
stages in the acquirement of the sessile habit by the free-
swimming Polyzoon ancestors. The form is, however, to all
intents and purposes, a Loxosoma larva, with brain, sub-
cesophageal ganglion (not discovered in Pedicellina until a
stage later than fig. 10), and a pair of buds, one of which is
shown, I believe there are no authentic instances of the fixa-
250 SIDNEY F. HARMER.
tion of a Polyzoon larva by any other than its oral surface,
and it may therefore be assumed that this method of fixation
was acquired at a very early stage in the phylogeny of the
group. Let us suppose, however, that this ‘“Archi-Loxo-
soma,” on fixing itself by the edge of its vestibule, left an
aperture (for the entrance of food), surrounded by the ciliated
ring (vide fig. 17), leading from the exterior into the otherwise
closed vestibule, and situated behind the anus.
Subsequent development may be imagined to give rise to a
form like fig. 18, in which the vestibular opening is an elon-
gated slit, extending along the whole of the region formerly
occupied by the posterior side, and still surrounded by the
ciliated ring. The mouth, in order to obtain its food as con-
veniently as possible, now faces the posterior side (of the
former stage), and this has entailed a rotation of the entire
alimentary canal, in the manner shown in fig. 18.
_ By the growth of the proximal end of the Polyzoon, the
mouth would be thrust away from the point of support, and
the animal might thereby obtain an advantage in procuring
food by means of its ciliary currents. But during this process,
the proximal portions of the ciliated ring would become far
less efficient for obtaining food than the distal portions, and
would tend to atrophy. The final result would be the acquire-
ment of a form like fig. 19, representing in a very slightly
diagrammatic form, an adult Loxosoma. The ciliated ring is
here represented as consisting of two disconnected portions, cor-
responding (1) to the ring of tentacles ; (2) to the foot-gland (ef.
the second of Barrois’ conclusions quoted on p. 248). The foot-
gland has remained practically as an open groove, a series of
ciliated tentacles having been developed round the margin of
the permanent vestibule.
The position of the buds in the larval Loxosoma appears at
first sight fatal to the above hypothesis. That this larva does
actually develop buds normally can hardly be doubted, since
I have shown not only that these structures are developed
twenty-four hours after hatching (which might, however, be an
abnormal circumstance, due to the want of proper conditions
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 251
for fixation), but also that ectodermic thickenings, the com-
mencements of the buds, are to be detected some time before
the embryo is ready to leave the maternal vestibule, the possi-
bility of the development having been influenced by abnormal
conditions being here out of the question.
In figs. 17,18, and 19, the position of the dorsal organ is
represented as not having been much altered during the rota-
tion of the alimentary canal, which has, so to speak, been
pulled through the loop formed by the dorsal organ and the
somewhat hypothetical subcesophageal ganglion. Assuming for
the moment this position for the dorsal organ, we find that
throughout the metamorphosis the buds retain their original
situation (in Loxosoma) between the dorsal organ and the
ciliated ring, and that their position with regard to the ceso-
phagus is practically the same as that which characterised them
at their first appearance.
Is there, however, any reason for believing that the position
of the dorsal organ is correctly indicated in the diagrams? It
seems to me that this question must be answered in the affirma-
tive. In the first place, the degenerating dorsal organ of
Pedicellina does in reality occupy this position, and in the
second place (vide No. 3 of Barrois’ conclusions on p. 248),
the circumcesophageal commissures may be represented by the
strong ganglionated nerves passing from the ganglion to the
“posterior sense-organs”” in L. crassicauda, as originally
described by Salensky (see also No. 4, Pl. xix, fig.1). Should
the metamorphosis of Loxosoma be proved to bear out this
suggestion of Barrois’, we must assume either that the whole
brain has atrophied, or that the adult possesses at most a small
portion of the brain at the ends of the two widely separated
cesophageal commissures.
With regard to the actual metamorphosis of Pedicellina,
I have to point out that Ihave not succeeded in demonstrating
the presence either of cesophageal commissures or of a sub-
cesophageal ganglion. The latter structure becomes distinct
only at a stage later than fig. 10, and it then has the position
which characterises the adult ganglion.
VOL, XXVII, PART 2.—NEW SEK 8
bo
Pe SIDNEY F. HARMER.
No. 1 of Barrois’ conclusions quoted on p. 248, appears to
me perfectly just. It is impossible in fact not to be struck
with the great resemblance between the solitary Pedicellina
shown in fig. 10 and an adult Loxosoma, and this similarity
is quite conspicuous even at much later stages. The obliquity
of the lophophore in Loxosoma is hence, on the view already
explained, another of the archaic features of this genus, the
lophophore having still a marked inclination to the “ anterior”
side of the animal (fig. 19).
It is unfortunate that the metamorphosis of Loxosoma,
which possesses a foot-gland, should be unknown, but we are
able to make certain inferences from the phenomena of budding.
Both vestibule and foot-gland originate as longitudinal groove-
like invaginations of the ectoderm of the “ anterior” face of
the bud. Fig. 15 is a reproduction of a drawing from Oscar
Schmidt, in which the foot-gland is represented as originating
from the two proximal cells of the ectoderm of the “ anterior”
side of the bud, and in which it is further seen that these cells
are not in the least marked off from those which are taking
part in the formation of the vestibule. The relations of lopho-
phore and foot-gland in this figure are indeed exactly those of
the ciliated ring in the diagram (fig. 18).
The Metamorphosis of Pedicellina viewed in its
relation to the above Hypothesis.
I have no reason to believe that the position of the ciliated
ring shown in fig 1] is in any way altered during the subsequent
metamorphosis. This structure in all probability degenerates
in situ.
The ciliary apparatus of an ordinary Trochosphere is not,
however, constituted entirely by the preoral circlet. In the
neighbourhood of the latter there occurs in Polygordius,
e. g., (cf. Hatschek, No. 2) a series of smaller cilia forming a
postoral circlet, whilst a third part of the apparatus is con-
stituted by “‘a ciliated groove running between the two ciliated
rings, and prolonging itself into the ciliated mouth,” This
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 253
last portion is obviously represented in Pedicellina by the
ciliated oral grooves, continuous, as in Polygordius, with
the mouth. The relations of these grooves during the meta-
morphosis appear to me to deserve further consideration.
We have found that the median postanal portion of the
vestibule is continuous with the oral grooves, of which it may,
indeed, be said to form a part. Acccording to Hatschek
(1) it is, like other portions of the vestibule, lined by ciliated
cells.
If we are justified in assuming that the oral groove—a part
of the typical Trochospheral ciliary apparatus—extends, poten-
tially at least, from the mouth completely round the vestibule
to the postanal region, it seems to me that considerable light
is thrown on the metamorphosis. The morphological position
of the oral groove will be in no way altered during the rotation
of the alimentary canal, and in fig. 16 it will continue to pass
from the mouth round the ab-anal side of the altered lateral
folds to the median post-anal portion of the vestibule, even
though it is no longer distinguishable in the persisting division
of the latter structure. In figs. 16 and 6 we observe, however,
the commencement of a separation of the oral groove into two
parts—one continuous with, and becoming indistinguishable
from, the “ oral” section of the vestibule (v. or. in fig. 16), and
the other potentially passing from the free apex of the epistome
in fig. 16 to the end of the reference line m. v. in the same
figure. The position of this latter portion will be the median
line passing from a.v.v. to m.v. Owing to the fact that it
is situated behind the anal cone it is, of course, unpaired (cf.
fig. 5), and it appears to me that its situation may be very
fairly considered to be represented by the linear groove which
in fig. 11 has formed the permanent vestibular aperture. From
the margins of this groove are developed the tentacles, which,
if the above reasoning is legitimate, are formed from the region
of the oral groove.
The fact that the tentacles of the adult lophophore of the
oral side are on the ab-anal side of the mouth appears to me
254 SIDNEY F. HARMER.
to prove that the lophophore itself is developed from a mor-
phologically preoral portion of the oral groove.
The relation between the velum proper and the oral cilia has
become, in the Entoprocta, considerably complicated by the
formation of a fold of integument (vestibular wall), carrying
the former to some distance from the latter. When the
Pedicellina larva attaches itself, the distance between the two
structures becomes increased. The velar portion maintains its
position at fixation, and soon atrophies ; the oral groove, on
the contrary, growing away from the degenerated velum. Even
during the phylogenetic history of the process we may suppose
that the velum atrophied at fixation. This is par excellence
a locomotive structure, and would be useless in an attached
condition. The oral cilia would, however, continue (in the
hypothetical stage of fig. 18) to convey food to the mouth, and
the cells bearing them would, after a time, become prolonged
into tentacles, by which their range of activity would be
extended.
During the abbreviated metamorphosis of Pedicellina it
has hence resulted (if the above be true) that the velum takes
no part in the change of position involved in the passage to the
adult condition.
Summarizing the above, I may express my conviction (1)
that the metamorphosis of Pedicellina is a simple modifica-
tion of a more archaic process, due to abbreviation of develop-
ment, (2) that the oral groove persists in part as the adult
lophophore, (3) that the vestibule closes at fixation, and under-
goes the whole of its alterations in the interior of the larva,
opening secondarily only when the adult condition is practi-
cally attained.
The adult form is reached by the elongation of the stalk of
fig. 10, and by the replacement of its contained “ globules ” by
characteristic connective-tissue and muscle-cells ; by the for-
mation of a stolon and a diaphragm, and by various alterations
in the calyx. The more important of these consist in the
complete (or almost complete) loss of the obliquity of the
lophophore, in the development of the permanent ganglion
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 955
and generative organs (if these are formed in the primary
individual, as is probably the case) and in the complete forma-
tion of the vestibular aperture and tentacles. I have made no
special observations on most of the above points, although on
the important question of the origin of the colony from the
primary individual, I am able to throw some light.
In the first place, it may be stated that adult colonies are
by no means restricted to one growing point, as stated by
Hatschek (1). Of very common occurrence is the develop-
ment of two growing points, one at each end of the unbranched
stolon: I have noticed this even before the formation of a
single secondary calyx. A third growing point may be deve-
loped as a lateral branch of the main stolon; the amount of
branching is, however, always slight in P. echinata, and
apparently in all cases the cesophagus of each calyx is on the
side directed to the growing point to which this calyx properly
belongs, as already indicated by Hatschek.
The formation of the stolon is shown in fig. 13, a longi-
tudinal section of the stalk of a completely developed but
still solitary individual. The young stolon, which is cut
medianly, is developed on the cesophageal side of the Pedicel-
lina. The base of the stalk (which is alone represented) con-
sists of a thick cuticle, underneath which occurs a layer of
ectoderm, surrounding a gelatinous matrix in which lie con-
nective-tissue and muscle-cells. The section, however,—an
extremely good preparation—is contradictory to the theory of
Hatschek, according to which the apex of the stolon is pro-
vided with a hypoblastic vesicle derived from the dorsal organ,
and engaged in the formation of the mid-gut of the secondary
calyces. I may at once state that I have entirely failed to
convince myself of the occurrence of any such vesicle, at any
period, in the stolon, and I am forced to believe that Hatschek
has been mistaken in assuming its existence. Neither in
sections nor in entire specimens (whether living or treated
with reagents) could I discover the slightest evidence of the
presence of Hatschek’s vesicle, although I have investigated
both adult and young stolons in this connection.
256 SIDNEY F. HARMER.
It appears to me probable that the growing point of the
stolon of Pedicellina (vide fig. 13) consists solely of an ecto-
dermic layer secreting a cuticle and of a mass of indifferent
mesodermic connective-tissue cells, embedded in a structure-
less jelly. If this is the case, the only organ derived from the
hypoblast of the embryo would appear to be the mesenteron of
the primary individual, all other parts of the colony being
devoid of any derivatives of hypoblast cells.
This conclusion can hardly be avoided unless we assume that
some of the stellate cells of fig. 16 are really hypoblastic in
nature, although indistinguishable from the mesoderm cells in
their appearance. Owing to the nature of the process by
which the dorsal organ degenerates, it is impossible to assert
that some of its cells do not become ameboid wandering cells
which migrate into the growing point. It can, however, be
safely stated that no hypoblastic vesicle is formed from the
degenerating dorsal organ. It may further be pointed out that
the conclusion arrived at on a previous occasion as to the
nervous (epiblastic) nature of the dorsal organ, in Pedicellina
as in Loxosoma, is in opposition to the view that this struc-
ture plays any part in the budding.
The well-known fact that calyces of Pedicellina may fall
from their stalks, which thereupon develop new calyces, appears
to me in direct contradiction to Hatschek’s view of the bud-
ding. The loss of the calyces is probably a normal, periodically
occurring process, which is perhaps to be regarded as a means
of rejuvenescence, and which is at least analogous to the forma-
tion of the “ brown bodies ” in the Ectoprocta. Itis exceed-
ingly easy to discover individuals in healthy colonies in which
the calyx has been lost, and a new “ bud” (easily recognised
by its small size and immature condition) is being developed
just below the scar. Specimens kept in captivity seem inva-
riably to lose their calyces if the quantity of water is not very
large, the calyx falling off at the “diaphragm.” This struc-
ture, which is merely a constriction at the base of the calyx,
filled by a row of flat cells, is perhaps a special arrangement
by which the calyx can break away from the stalk, without
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 257
injury to the latter. I have been unable to show that calyces
which have thus left their stalks are able to become the starting-
points of fresh colonies. The specimens under observation have
invariably died after a day or two, even if kept in a tide-pool.
Calyces formed at the scars produced in the manner above
indicated, seem to me (from superficial examination of entire
specimens) to develop in exactly the same manner as those
produced at the true growing point. The occurrence of this
phenomenon is undoubtedly adverse to Hatschek’s theory of
budding ; the whole of the stomach falls away with the calyx,
whilst the existence of a plug of cells filling up the diaphragm
appears to preclude the possibility of the migration of any
cells derived from the stomach to the proximal side of the
diaphragm. Unless, indeed, it is assumed that some of the
“‘ connective-tissue ” cells of the stalks as well as of the stolon
are endodermic in nature, it must be concluded that none of
the cells of the bud are descendants of any of the cells belong-
ing to the embryonic hypoblast.
With regard to the further history of the budding (whether
at the growing point or at the apex of an old stalk) I have very
little to say. The free end of the stolon (or stalk) before long
develops an ectodermic invagination (fig. 14) destined to give
rise to the lophophore and, according to my view, to the whole
of the alimentary canal of the bud. The latter is from the
first continuous with the lophophoral rudiment, and in other
sections of the series to which fig. 14 belongs, the stomach and
vestibular cavity are separated from one another by means of a
septum. The latter does not, however, cut off the whole of
the deepest part of the invagination, but, since it is not deve-
loped in the position of the cesophagus the vestibule and stomach
remain continuous with one another (as in fig. 14). By the
formation of a diaphragm and by other processes already
described by Hatschek, the bud attains its adult condition.
The continuation of the stolon is formed by a lateral outgrowth
from that region in the young bud which afterwards becomes
the base of its stalk, precisely as in fig. 13 with the exception of
the fact that the new growing point is formed long before the
958 SIDNEY F. HARMER.
bud is itself mature. It is worthy of remark that the young
vestibular invagination does not occur accurately at the apex
of the stolon, but on the side of the apex turned towards the
growing point. In this respect it exactly agrees with the
position of the vestibular invagination formed near the apex
of a stalk which has lost its calyx, and again with that of the
incompletely rotated vestibule in intermediate stages of the
metamorphosis. It may indeed be said that the young
vestibule of all the buds is inclined towards the growing point,
and that in all cases it subsequently undergoes a rotation in
the same direction (but to a less marked degree) as that occur-
ing at the metamorphosis.
The history of the Pedicellina-larva appears to me to point
to the existence of a fixation-period in Loxosoma also. In
this case, the buds observed by me in the larva of L. Lepto-
clini would probably have to undergo a change of position,
during the metamorphosis, similar to that represented in figs.
17—19. I am inclined to believe that the degeneration of the
larval stomach observed in the same species, after a free life of
one or two days, was abnormal, and was due to the absence of
the conditions necessary for fixation.
On the Nature of the “Brown Bodies” of the
Ecetoprocta.
The above statements with regard to the life-history of the
Entoprocta may, perhaps, give some indication of the manner
in which the “ brown bodies” of the Ectoprocta have origi-
nated. There can probably be no longer any doubt whatever
that these structures are degenerated polypides, which are
subsequently replaced by new ones budded off from the walls
of the zccecia.
In the metamorphosis of Pedicellina the purely larval
organs degenerate and form a mass of cells, which subsequently
become connective-tissue cells. The degeneration is here
slight, and has not yet acquired sufficient importance to give
rise to a characteristic “ brown body.”
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 259
Whilst in the adult Loxosoma nothing comparable to the
formation of “ brown bodies” is known, the adnlt Pedicel-
lina has developed a special arrangement—the constriction at
the base of the calyx—by which the latter may be lost without
material injury to the remainder of the colony.
In the adult Ectoprocta there seems to be the same
necessity for the rejuvenescence of some of the organs, but
here the occurrence of a thick ectocyst, usually intimately con-
nected with that of neighbouring individuals, in general pre-
vents the loss of any part of the body wall, asin Pedicellina.
In some of the stoloniferous Ctenostomata, however, the
entire zocecium is deciduous.
But even in Pedicellina one may almost speak of a
“‘zocecium” in the same sense as in the Ectoprocta. It isa
well-known fact that septa occur at intervals across the stolon
of Pedicellina, and in most cases are developed in such a
manner that a piece of the stolon, connected with the base of
each stalk, is cut off from the remainder of the stolon by a pair
of symmetricaliy-placed septa. There are thus typically two
septa between the bases of each two stalks, and stalk-bearing
and stalkless sections of the stolon alternate regularly with one
another.
It is thus possible to consider stalk plus portion of stolon
connected with it, the representative of a zocecium. The distal
end of the zocecium is from time to time segmented off, carry-
ing with it the whole of the alimentary apparatus, whilst a new
polypide is developed within the remaining portion by a process
of budding. By the formation of a new constriction the distal
part of the zocecium—the calyx—becomes again differentiated
from the proximal part—the stalk.
In the Ectoprocta the occurrence of the same process is
usually obviously impossible, and the polypide alone degenerates,
forming a ‘“ brown body” which subsequently passes into the
new stomach, and is ejected by the anus. The occurrence of
this circumstance is already foreshadowed in two particulars in
Pedicellina. We find, in the first place, that a new polypide
is actually budded off by the ectoderm of the zocecium at or
260 SIDNEY F. HARMER.
before the loss of the calyx; and, in the second place, that the
tissues have already acquired, at the metamorphosis, the power
of disposing of degenerated structures.
In the Ectoprocta one may hence suppose that, owing
to the inconvenience of losing a portion of the zocecium at each
rejuvenescence, the new polypide is budded off near the pre-
ceding one, instead of from an entirely different part of the
zocecium, as in Pedicellina (below the diaphragm). The
degenerating alimentary canal and other structures are then
worked up by the “ Parenchymgewebe” (Vigelius), which has
inherited this kind of power from the larval tissues, into the
condition of a “brown body,” which passes into the new
stomach, and reaches the exterior by means of the anus.
In the development of the Ectoprocta an archenteron is
formed, in a large number of cases at least. The embryo is,
however, richly supplied with yolk; it develops within the in-
terior of the parent, and its alimentary canal is hence, in many
cases, functionless.
At its metamorphosis this larva possesses no functional ali-
mentary canal, and must hence form a new one. But since in
its previous phylogenetic history our Polyzoon has acquired
the power of developing new “ polypides” from various parts
of its ectoderm, a fresh gut could without difficulty be formed
within the bedy wall of the metamorphosed larva; since the
latter is now in the same condition as an adulJt zocecium whose
polypide has just become a “ brown body.”
This, indeed, is what actually happens. The larva passes at
once into the condition of a zocecium containing a “ brown
body,” the remains of its larval organs. The complicated me-
tamorphosis of Pedicellina has been given up, the larval
structures now degenerating by the method employed during
the atrophy of the polypides in adult individuals, and finally
leaving the zocecium by passing as the first ‘‘ brown body”
into the alimentary tract of the primary polypide, and thence
to the exterior.
The metamorphosing Ectoproctan larva is probably in
the same condition (irrespective of the difference pointed out
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 261
in the methods by which the alimentary canal is lost in the
two cases) as the primary individual of a Pedicellina colony
would be immediately after the loss of its calyx, supposing that
it had not meanwhile developed a stolon and secondary
calyces.
Unless I am mistaken in my views with regard to the meta-
morphosis of Pedicellina, it appears to me necessary to con-
clude that in the Hntoprocta the ventral line of the body
extends from a.v.* in figs. 10 and 19, down the right sides of
the figures, as far as a. v.! The median dorsal line will in con-
sequence be represented by the entire left sides from a.v.! to
a.v.” These surfaces are most clearly expressed in the young
Loxosoma bud, in which the whole of the surface turned
away from the parent (characterised by the possession of ves-
tibule and foot-gland) is ventral, whilst the opposite surface of
the bud is, conversely, dorsal.
I hope to be able before long to publish some account of the
development and metamorphosis of the Ectoprocta. Till that
time I prefer to withhold any further expression of opinion
with regard to the surfaces and relations of the larve of this
group of the Polyzoa.
List oF Papers REFERRED TO.
1. B. Hatscnex.— Embryonalentwicklung und Knospung der Pedicellina
echinata,” ‘ Zeits. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xxix, 1877, 8. 502.
2. B. Harscorx.— Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Anneliden,”’
© Arb. a. d. Zool. Inst. zu Wien,’ Bd. i, 1878, S. 277.
3. J. Barrots.—“ Métamorphose de la Pédicelline.” ‘Comptes rendus de
PAcad. des Sci.,’ T. xcii, 1881, p. 1527.
4. 8. FE. Harmer.—“ On the Structure and Development of Loxosoma,”
‘Quart. Journ. Mic. Sci.,’ vol. xxv, 1885, p. 261.
262 SIDNEY F. HARMER.
EXPLANATION OF PLATES XXI & XXII,
Illustrating Mr. S. F. Harmer’s Paper on “ The Life-history
of Pedicellina.”
Reference Letters.
an. Anus. an.c. Analcone. a.v.tand a.v.? Hypothetical morphologically
anterior and posterior ends, respectively, of the vestibular aperture. a. v. v.
Aperture between oral and anal divisions of vestibule (in position of permanent
mouth). d. Bud. 4ér. Brain (= “dorsal organ”). c.c. Fragments of
ciliated cells. c.p. Ciliated pit of brain. c. 7. Cihated ring. d.s. Dorsal
sense-organ (of Loxosoma). epst. Epistome. / dr. Fibrous part of brain.
fg. Foot-gland. ga. Ganglion of adult. g.p. Growing point of stolon.
g.v. Median groove of permanent vestibule, ultimately becoming the vesti-
bular aperture (in position of part of oral groove of larva?). zé. Intestine.
1.7. Lateral fold of vestibular wall. 7. v. Lateral portions of anal division of
vestibule. m. Mouth. mes. Mesoderm. m.v. Median postanal portion of
the anal division of the vestibule. @. Csophagus. o.g. Oral groove.
rec. Rectum. s. Sucker. s¢. Stomach. ¢. Tentacle. v. Vestibule. v. a.
Its aperture. v. an. “ Anal” division of vestibule. v. or. “Oral” division.
v. v. Ventral division. z. Large-celled tissue at base of epistome and anal
cone.
PLATE XXI.
Pedicellina echinata.
Fic. 1.—Median longitudinal section of a larva quite recently fixed (on
. Coralline).
Fic. 2.—Obliquely longitudinal section (in the plane C D in figs 3 and 4?)
of a similar larva.
Fic. 3.—Horizontal section of a slightly older larva, passing through brain
(= dorsal organ), esophagus, epistome, and anal cone.
Fic. 4.—Obliquely transverse section (in the plane A B in fig. 1), at a stage
very soon after fixation.
1 In describing one section as passing in a plane indicated in the figure of
another, it is to be understood that the details in the two individuals do not
always exactly correspond. This is due, partly to a difference in age between
the two larve figured, and partly to variations in the position of the internal
structures, owing to varying conditions of muscular contraction.
ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 263
Fic. 5.—Horizontal section, at an early stage in the metamorphosis, passing
through the tip of the epistome, the lateral folds and oral grooves, and the
apex of the anal cone.
Fics. 6 and 7.—Two sections of a considerably older individual, passing
respectively in the planes K L and I J in Fig. 16.
Fies. 8 and 9.—Two sections of an individual of the age of Fig. 16, passing
in an obliquely longitudinal direction. Fig. 8 cuts the mouth and one of the
lateral portions of the permanent vestibule, Fig. 9 passing through the rectum
and the degenerating vestibule of the stalk. In another section of the same
series the two parts of the vestibule are continuous, exactly as in the diagram,
Fig. 16.
Fic. 10.—Median longitudinal section of an advanced, but still solitary,
individual.
Fic. 11.—Horizontal section (in the plane GH in Fig. 10) through a
similar specimen.
Fie. 12.—Section of an individual of the age of Figs. 8 and 9, passing in
the plane E F in the latter figure.
Fie. 13.—Median longitudinal section through the stalk of a solitary
individual with commencing primary stolon. The arrow indicates the position
of the oral side of the calyx.
Fic. 14.—Obliquely transverse section of a young bud, developed at the
growing point.
PLATE XXII.
Fic. 15.—Young bud of Loxosoma, from the ventral side. Copied from
O. Schmidt, ‘ Arch. f. mik. Anat.,’ Bd. xii, 1876, Pl. ITI, fig. 17.
Fie. 16.—Diagrammatic longitudinal section of a metamorphosing Pedi-
cellina at the stage of Figs. 8, 9, &c.
Fies. 17—19.—Diagrams illustrating the supposed morphological nature of
the metamorphosis of the Entoprocta, A full explanation is given in the
text.
| . a . Pi, | re
on ; ee 2 i rar ~, ae
ia wy
. Ry | - ve = 7
toa favtitonaert ne
iediaos tli stip fa heen Bale Cae Or iw AAD
ore 0 cethee Tad Perit Wl? . CTT ah aut oi:
aires ary ‘iio ota Ceci: v i" Higiain ‘et! ” nea fe e
~ sel wl MH Hil ia ; al. fall uf f d _
ities Life ed Vela aft {a abit Ae dike ti etOrena4 ssw 'itlon D nr)
a? Teune? a Mover edhe ¥ 54 ih imerate ith ei le
RAY pew 0a Gs aay LPT lt) w imate oh iin
«Views? Wy vated Gana Aa aie SWyewiatiltese ul Hetil a
y pee i Tite «Mig Ag Arr pO Ro ev lhrelt: al yp ) Ree
a " a. ”
¢ velbee (bie. tig mee wipe eae Whe “euha? (enhipidal gulf hi f
; Jan
ha
e Copa) (Ptah vaes wally sit iy Teal i innate Nfl
> it sia 4
i “Ltt yah ie) Dita | . i tor uae Sas he T ies 3
head ys thal \ Lovee
ives i. tu V. dethe ‘ albus an Aly *
(eid) ai ew ; ait opr be tflacreaabl yrs
finaly Awad
7 i @
uy ? a( ite i i,t iin) eta TLE scr it ar
+ 8
suit at
a9 iM Ay)
hy
(Ate? LHOKA i | he teil why ecu? @ alge Huet ein |,
Mf este | P L jie an si > Aoee “bial la ar
Vy A ell As @ 1h, a is at winiuel 8 ALLLcA) Ee bd (Che AL &
; Sa en ae see 4 “i
h OG) THA OMe Ta fer wil hey Lait law Ts VP
: oy
i ifwiderm i ADA, Hulls > TPOTHU ARAL: Gar dati ol
; 5 h
4 &
- 4 -
‘ Le a Mey
*
a a — |
- 6
if ‘
; »
EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 265
Dr. Dohrn’s Inquiries into the Evolution of
Organs in the Chordata.
By
J.T. Cunningham, B.A., F.R.S.E.
SEVEN years elapsed from the publication of the ‘ Ursprung
der Wirbelthiere’ before the appearance of the first of Dohrn’s
‘Studien zur Urgeschichte des Wirbelthierkorpes,’ that on
the mouth of Teleosteans. As he points out in a short preface
to that paper the three chief peculiar articles of faith in his
previous essay, in comparison with the views current at the
time, were that the ancestors of Vertebrates closely resembled
Annelids, that the principle of change of function was the
safest guide in tracing morphological histories, and that the
extent to which degeneration might proceed was unlimited.
In the attempt to reconstruct the Vertebrate ancestor, Dohrn
has concentrated his attention almost exclusively on the
actual structure and development of the organs of existing
Vertebrates, convinced that a great deal of what was generally
believed concerning the relation of the organs was inaccurate,
and that no light could be thrown on the question by hasty
conclusions drawn from superficial resemblances of the organs
of Vertebrate and other embryos, until the organisation of
the Vertebrates themselves was more thoroughly investigated.
The following is a list of the studies with the dates of pub-
lication :
1882. I. “ Der Mund der Knochenfische.”
II. “Die Entstehung und Bedeutung der Hypophysis bei den
Teleostiern.”
1883. III. “ Die Entstehung und Bedeutung der Hypophysis bei Petro-
myzon Planeri.”
266 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
1884. IV. “Die Entwicklung und Differenzirung der Kiemenbogen der
Selachier.”
V. “Zur Entstehung und Differenzirung der Visceralbogen bei Pe-
tromyzon Planeri.”
VI. “Die paarigen und unpaaren Flossen der Selachier.”
1885. VII. “ Entstehung und Differenzirung des Zungenbein und Kiefer
Apparates der Selachier.” '
VIII. “Die Thyreoidea bei Petromyzon, Amphioxus, und den Tuni- |: |
caten.”
IX. “Die Bedeutung der Unpaaren Flosse fiir die Beurtheilung der
genealogischen Stellung der Tunicaten und des Amphioxus,
und die Reste der Beckenflosse bei Petromyzon.”
X. “ Zur Phylogenese des Wirbelthierauges.”
Ancestral Mouth—TIn the first of these studies reference is
made to the question of the position of the ancestral mouth,
which in the‘ Ursprung der Wirbelthiere’ was located between
the crura cerebelli in the fourth ventricle. Professor Fritsch
and Mr. Sanders argued that this was an untenable supposition,
because it would be impossible to accept the consequence of
it, namely, that all the cerebral nerves belonged to a supra-
cesophageal ganglion. Dohrn acknowledges the justice of the
objection, and provisionally abandons the quest of the ancestral
mouth. He has never since resumed the inquiry. He deals
with investigations of the development of the actual mouth, the
results of which confirm his view that the aperture represents
a united pair of gill-clefts. Im embryos of Teleosteans he found
that there was no stomodzeum, and that the mouth arose as a
pair of enteric outgrowths which at first opened to the exterior,
one on each side, the apertures only subsequently meeting in
the middle ventral line.
Hypophysis of Teleosteans and Petromyzon.
The hypophysis also in Teleosteans, according to the second
paper of the series, does not arise from an ectodermal oral
invagination or stomodeum, but from a pair of endodermal
evaginations in front of those which form the mouth. The
organ therefore represents a pair of przoral gill-clefts (i. e. it
is derived in the Teleosteans from the endodermal parts of
EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA, 267
such a pair) which in the actual development of Teleosteans
never acquire an opening to the exterior. In a postscript to
this paper Dohrn mentions Hatschek’s results concerning the
origin of the ciliated pit in Amphioxus. This pit is the left of
a pair of anterior evaginations of the endoderm, which opens
to the exterior while the other remains closed. According to
Dohrn these two diverticula are homologous with the hypo-
physis in the Teleostean, and the opening in Amphioxus is
the persistent branchial opening. The ciliated pit of the
Ascidians is also homologous with that of Amphioxus. Ac-
cording to Bateson the proboscis cavity with its pore in Balano-
glossus is homologous with the ciliated pit in Amphioxus,
but whether the body cavity of the proboscis in Balanoglossus
can be derived from a pair of gill-clefts is a question which
seems to threaten to do away with the possibility of the diagno-
sis of organs according to their embryological origin.
The hypophysis in Petromyzon has a unique history in the
individual, and this forms the subject of the third member of
the series. The examination of the embryos of Petromyzon
was undertaken by Dohrn in order to prove that the funda-
mental difference generally supposed to exist between the
branchial cartilages of Selachians and of Petromyzon was
entirely imaginary, but the discussion of this subject is post-
poned till the hypophysis has been considered. Scott! had
stated that the hypophysis of the Lamprey arose as an ecto-
dermal invagination connected with the nasal pit.
Balfour had doubted this result, but Dohrn entirely confirmed
it, except that he found the hypophysial invagination to be at first
separate, lying between the commencing mouth and nasal cavity,
and that he pointed out that the whole long nasal duct of the
adult which runs back beneath the brain is as much part of the
hypophysis as the follicular organ formed from its inner ex-
tremity.2. The nasal duct is in fact a fused pair of ectodermal
1 *Morph. Jahrb.,’ vii.
2 It seems extremely probable, although I am not aware that it has been
suggested before, that the nasal duct which in Myxine opens into the pharynx,
is homologous with the so-called nasal duct of Petromyzon. If this be so, of
VOL, XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER, T
268 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
pits originally belonging to the pair of gill-clefts which has been
transformed into the hypophysis. The function of the nasal
duct in the adult is apparently to draw in water in order
that it may reach the olfactory organ and then expel it; it is
probably, to use an undignified word, a sniffing organ, neces-
sitated by the disconnection of the mouth from the function of
respiration. This new function of the hypophysial gill-clett
could easily be derived from its original one.
Visceral Arches of Elasmobranchs.
In order to demonstrate the fallacy of the argument that
the external branchial cartilages of Selachians were the repre-
sentatives of a primitive “ external” branchial skeleton retained
in the existing Cyclostomata, it would have been sufficient, says
the beginning of the fourth study, to describe the development
of these two cartilages (two to each arch) in Selachians and
compare it with the quite different history of the branchial
skeleton in the Lamprey. But it seemed advisable to give a
complete account of the development of the Elasmobranch
gill-arch, as previous results were fragmentary.
It is to be understood that a typical arch such as the first,
second, or third branchial, is under consideration, not the hyoid
or the posterior, which are either modified or reduced. In a
horizontal section of the arch towards its middle the cavity of
the arch surrounded by its epithelial cells (head-cavity of
course the connection between the pharynx and the nasal pits in Myxine is
formed by the hypophysis and not by a nostril properly so named. The hypo-
physial invagination in the embryo of Petromyzon comes into very close
relation with the pharynx as well as with the infundibulum, and on the hypo-
thesis which I have supported in my paper on Kupffer’s vesicle, &c., that the
infundibulum represents the original mouth, it is easy to understand how a
separation between infundibulum and pharynx might occur in either of two
ways, by leaving the hypophysis connected only with the infundibulum as
in Petromyzon, or by leaving the communication between hypophysis and
pharynx still open as in Myxine. In other Vertebrates again the hypophysial
invagination has been absorbed inte the stomodzum, and reaches from thence
to the infundibulum, but has not retained a connection with the pharynx.
These speculations can of course only be tested by examination of the deve-
lopment of Myxine,
EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 269
Balfour and his school) is seen in the centre dividing the
section into an anterior and posterior half. This cavity is
continuous below with the pericardium. The artery of the
arch is on the posterior side of the cavity, or as it is better to
call it, from the destination of its walls, of the muscle tube of
the arch. The branchial processes grow out first on the pos-
terior side, and along their base appears a vein which opens
dorsally into the artery. Similarly on the anterior side appear
branchial processes with an anterior vein, also opening into
the artery. The two veins become connected by two hori-
zontal commissures. In the adult the posterior vein becomes
disconnected from the anterior and unites with the anterior vein
of the arch behind it.
The cartilaginous arch arises as a condensation of mesoderm
cells posterior to the muscle-plate. Between the upper and
lower venous commissures, where the muscle-tube is already
diminished in thickness, condensation of mesoderm cells takes
place also on the anterior side, and the two condensed masses
uniting, eliminate the muscle-tube between them. This separa-
tion of the muscle-tube does not take place dorsally and ven-
trally, because the cartilaginous arch bends inwards in those
regions. A central part of the muscle-tube is thus separated
and lies on the inner side of the arch; it becomes the adductor
arcus visceralis. Both Gegenbauer and Vetter believe the
adductor mandibule to be homodynamous with the adductor
arcus, but this is an error, the former is homodynamous with
the whole musculature of one (or more) arch. The external
middle portions of the tubes form the musculi interbranchiales ;
the dorsal, externally the constrictor superficialis, internally the
interarcuales. Other muscles come from the ventral portions,
The coracohyoid is a true body muscle, and has nothing to
do with visceral arches.
The cartilage already described, the middle portion first
developed, forms the two middle internodes of the adult arch.
Above these dorsally is the basale, below the copulare. The
cartilage separates the adductor from the interarcualis above,
from the coracobranchialis below. The cartilage is internal to
270 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
the artery ; and the artery is at first posterior to the muscle-
tube. The branchial cartilaginous rays arise as condensations
of mesoderm cells separate from the arch, and between the
artery and posterior vein. The so-called external cartilages
are simply the most dorsal and the most ventral of the series
of rays altered somewhat in position, and therefore have no
similarity with the arches in Petromyzon, which are true arches.
Branchial lamelle are never developed on the anterior side
of the hyoid arch, or of the spiracular arch. The external
filaments of the embryo arise as simple elongations of the
posterior lamelle of each arch, the anterior not elongating
at all. A curious suggestion is made concerning the function
of these elongated filaments, namely, that they serve to absorb
yolk ; how the yolk gets into them could not be discovered,
but yolk is present in the filaments and in their veins, in the
posterior branchial vein, and the efferent arteries, never in the
branchial artery or in the heart.
Thymus of Elasmobranchs.
At the time when the external filaments have attained to
about half their length, but when the branchial rays are not
differentiated, a proliferation of epithelium takes place in the
upper angle of the first gill-cleft, forming a kind of bud.
Similar buds are formed in the four posterior gill-clefts, but
the fifth bud disappears again entirely in the Sharks, but
persists in the Rays. These buds form the thymus of the
adult. The cause of the separation of these portions of the
branchial epithelium is the shortening of the clefts. The
upper portion of the original clefts is obliterated by a coales-
cence of the arches, accompanied by processes of growth which
alter the original position of the terminal rays of each series,
and so produce the extra-branchial cartilages. The epithelial
nodules of the thymus after they have sunk into the mesoderm
become associated with mesodermic cells, a process which
ought not to excite surprise, since the epithelium in question
originally no doubt formed branchial laminz into which meso-
derm extended. The bending of the arches above described is
EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 271
connected with the formation of the united portions of the
musculus constrictor superficialis, but the original cause of the
whole process is to be explained only after further investiga-
tions have been described. Lcker first definitely described the
thymus of fishes in his article ‘‘ Blood-vessel Glands,” in Wag-
ner’s ‘ Dictionary of Physiology,’ Bd. iv, but could find no such
organ in the Sturgeon, in Cyclostomata, or in Teleosteans.
In a foot-note Dohrn points out that the thymus of Teleosteans
exists in the position already accurately defined by Leydig in
his ‘ Anat. histol. Untersuchungen tiber Fische und Reptilien.’
In this note also emphatic contradiction is made of Gegen-
baur’s generally accepted view that the pseudobranchia of
Teleosteans is the reduced gill of the hyoid arch, and therefore
not homologous with the pseudobranchia or spiracular gill of
Elasmobranchs. Dohrn maintains that Johann Miller was
quite right in asserting that the pseudobranchia of Teleosteans
was homologous with the spiracular gill of Elasmobranchs,
and that Balfour, who has been followed by Hoffmann, was
mistaken in supposing that in the Teleosteans the choroid
gland represents the spiracular gill. Stieda found that the
thymus of mammals arose from only one gill-cleft, the last, or
last but one ; Dohrn states that the carotid gland may possibly
represent a rudimentary thymus derived from another cleft.
Branchial Skeleton and Arches of Petromyzon.
After showing that the extra-branchial cartilages of Elasmo-
branchs are really displaced gill rays, the next point in arguing
that the branchial skeleton of Petromyzon is composed of
true branchial arches, is to demonstrate the development of
this skeleton, and this is the object of the fifth paper. It is
known from the researches of Scott and Balfour that the
first trace of the visceral arches appears in the form of
head-cavities, rounded cell-tubes between the diverticula of
the gut, which afterwards form the gill-clefts. The question
of correspondence between the head-cavities and the dorsal
myotomes is left for a future period. There is a difference
between the embryonic gill arches of Petromyzon and those
272, J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
of Elasmobranchs in the position of the original vessel of the
arch. This vessel in the latter forms lies near the outer bor-
der of the arch; in Petromyzon it lies as near as possible to
the inner surface. The arch elongates and becomes flattened
antero-posteriorly ; the muscle-tube undergoes a correspond-
ing compression. The cartilaginous arch arises anterior to the
muscle-tube, but soon divides this tube in the middle of the
arch completely, separating an adductor on the inner side from
a constrictor on the outer, as in Selachians, The cells of the
anterior wall of the muscle-tube have a remarkable peculiarity.
They persist, in embryonic form, as long tubes, which run the
whole length of the arch, and show a transverse striation only
on the exterior. All the muscles run the whole length of the
arch and unite, dorsally as well as ventrally, with those of the
other side ; the important point about this is that if the carti-
laginous rods were to disappear the condition would be the
same as that which actually exists in Myxine. The chief dif-
ference between the gill lamine of the adult Petromyzon and
those of Selachians is that the former are directed towards the
exterior, the latter towards the interior, and this difference
appears at their first origin in the embryo. It is probable
that the adductors serve as inspiratory muscles by lifting up
the ventral side of the branchial region, and so expanding the
branchial cavities, while the constrictors are expiratory, their
contraction driving the water out.
Thus it is shown that the branchial skeleton of Petromyzon
is composed of true cartilaginous branchial arches. It is true
that these arches in the Cyclostomata are not segmented, nor
are they in the Teleostean ; and this shows that Petromyzon is
derived from a form more premature than the Selachian, in
which the segmentation had not yet occurred. The same truth
is indicated by the homology of the hypophysis with the nasal
duct, an homology which, as Dohrn frankly acknowledges, was
first asserted by Goette in his ‘Entwicklung der Unke.’
Petromyzon must have branched off from a condition in which
the hypophysis was still an independent preoral pair of gill-
clefts. That the gills of Petromyzon are homologous with
EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 273
those of Selachians has been suggested by Huxley and P.
Fiirbringer, and is by Dohrn’s results fully established.
Myxine is a further modification of Petromyzon, and shows a
remnant of the branchial skeleton in the cartilage of its ductus
cesophageo-cutaneus. The internal position of the branchial
artery in the embryo Petromyzon is simply explicable as a
consequence of the displacement of the branchial lamelle to-
wards the interior, and this change of position has been
brought about by the necessity of protecting the gills which
arose when the present habits of the animal (either burrowing
in mud or attaching itself to other animals) were acquired.!
Thus the theory that the branchial cartilages of Petromyzon
represent an archaic system not elsewhere present except in
the extra branchial cartilages of Selachians falls to the ground,
and with it disappear the consequences which Gegenbaur
formerly deduced from it. The Cyclostomata had no jaws it
was said because their ancestors had no true gill arches from
which jaws might be derived, whereas the truth is probably
they have lost the jaws through the conversion of the biting
1 In my paper on Myxine, in the previous number of this Journal, I have
described the habits of Myxine from actual observation. There can be no
doubt that during far the greater portion of its time the animal lies motion-
less, buried in mud, with only the extremity of its snout protruding. In this
condition the method of respiration, unique among fishes, namely, the constant
passage of a current of water through the nostril to the gill-pouches, is the
only method possible. Doubtless this method is also the most convenient
when the animal is boring into the body of a fish, or when its whole body has
penetrated into the flesh of its prey; and it is difficult to say which of its
habits, burrowing or boring into its prey, was the prior cause in producing
the existing condition of the respiratory organs. I have not yet ascertained
whether the respiratory current is maintained by ciliary action, or by internal
muscular action, or by both combined. No muscular respiratory movements
are visible externally. Ammoccetes, it is true, burrows, although it has a
branchial skeleton; and I do not know how the Ammoccetes, when buried,
can carry on the method of respiration which is seen in Petromyzon. Petro-
myzon never burrows, it conceals itself beneath stones and in crevices, but it
could not take in water by all its branchial apertures as it does unless it
were surrounded by water free from sediment. The comparison of the habits
of Petromyzon and Myxine illustrates the diversity of functions performed by
274, Jj. T. CUNNINGHAM.
into a sucking mouth. It was said that they had no lhmbs
because the skeleton of a limb was derived from an arch of
the branchial skeleton, and no true branchial arches were
present; the truth is that the limbs are not derived from
branchial arches, as is now generally acknowledged, and there
is a rudiment of the pelvic fin in Petromyzon, to be after-
wards described.
The Origin of the Fins of Fishes.
The true history of the origin of the limbs of fishes, paired
and unpaired fins, as Dohrn reads it, is set forth in the sixth
Study. Inthe original ancestral condition the Vertebrate body
was similar in most respects to that of an Annelid. The medul-
lary tube was an open plate, the intestine extended through
the whole length of the body to a terminal anus, and on each
segment were two pairs of appendages, processes of the body
wall provided with processes of the body musculature, in fact,
dorsal and ventral parapodia. The nerve plate was, of course,
ventral, when the animal was reversed in position and the plate
folded into a tube, the two series of ventral parapodia were
brought together in the median dorsal line and coalesced both
laterally and longitudinally, forming the dorsal fin, which was
originally continuous along the whole length of the body.
Another change which took place was that a new anus was
formed out of the fusion of two gill-slits, and in consequence
one organ, and the contrast between the functions of homologous organs in
two forms. An important function of the sucker-mouth of Petromyzon is to
adhere to stones in the bed of a river, and without this power the animal
would immediately lose control of its own movements, and be carried away at
the mercy of the currents in which it habitually lives. This function is
entirely wanting in Myxine, whose mouth is not truly a sucker at all, but a
boring apparatus, I have never seen a Myxine use its mouth to attach itself,
while Petromyzon never leaves its mouth attachment at one place, except to
immediately secure it again at another. Yet the mouth of Myxine can take
in food without boring, as is demonstrated every day in the North Sea when
the fisherman finds on his lines numbers of Myxine which have taken the
baited hook far down into the intestine without using their teeth upon the
bait at all.
EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 275
the postanal gut disappeared ; the degeneration of the postanal
gut is actually repeated in ontogeny. The contraction of the
ventral part of the tail thus brought about caused the series of
dorsal parapodia behind the anus to coalesce in the same manner
as the ventral parapodia, and thus the median anal fin was
produced. The przanal dorsal parapodia were never approxi-
mated laterally, but partly disappeared, partly coalesced longi-
tudinally to form the existing pelvic and pectoral fins. The
fins therefore have nothing to do with gills, either in the way
supposed in Gegenbaur’s Archipterygium theory, or in the
way originally suggested by Dohrn in the ‘ Ursprung der
Wirbelthiere. In the theory now taught by Dohrn the
metameric external gills of Annelids are left out of considera-
tion; the ancestor, it is to be presumed, had none. The facts
on which the theory is based, and which are important results
of investigation however explained, are as follows :—The mus-
culature of the pectoral fin is derived in embryos of Elasmo-
branchs (Pristiurus) from a series of muscle buds separated
from the ventral end of each myotome. Each bud divides
into four pieces, two above and two below. The same is true
of the pelvic fin. That these fins cannot be serially homo-
logous with any parts of the gill arches is proved by the fact
that the musculature of the gill arches is derived from the
head cavities, and these are ventral to the myotomes. So also
the gill cartilages are not homodynamous (serially homologous)
with the ribs, for the ribs are between the myotomes, the series
of which is continued anteriorly above the gill arches. A
large number of myotomes contribute to form each fin. Behind
the anus on each side muscle buds are given off from the
ventral ends of the myotomes ; these are serially homologous
with those already described, and in all probability, although
the transformation was not traced, they form the musculature
of the anal fin. The musculature of the dorsal fins arises from
buds given off dorsally exactly as those belonging to the paired
fins are given off ventrally. The fin rays in the dorsal fins
arise as median cartilaginous rays, at first quite unconnected
with any other part of the skeletou. One would have expected
276 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
to find, if the theory be true, that these rays were originally
double ; but Dohrn says nothing of this difficulty, attaching the
greatest importance to the musculature. It has been objected to
Dohrn’s theory by myself and Professor Carl Vogt that in Teleos-
tean embryosthere is a preanal median fin in addition to the pre-
anal paired fins ; to which Dohrn has replied that it has not been
proved that this fin has any musculature, and therefore it is pro-
bably a new development peculiar to the class in which it occurs.
Morphology of the Mandibular and Hyoid Arches of Selachians.
We come next to a discussion of one of the most compli-
cated chapters in Vertebrate morphology, the question of the
mandibular and hyoid arches in Selachians. We will take a
rapid survey of the facts as they exist according to Dohrn’s
investigations, and then consider the deductions he draws
from them. In embryos of Pristiurus, Scyllium, Mustelus,
Centrina, Torpedo, and Raja the conus arteriosus at its terminal
bifurcation forms the hyoid arteries, the arteries of the hyoid
arch. From each of these arteries near its origin arises
another artery which runs parallel to and anterior to the hyoid
artery. Between the bases of these two lies the thyroid gland,
and the arteries are to be called the thyroid arteries. The
hyoid artery supplies only one series of branchial laminz, the
posterior. There is also but one branchial hyoid vein, the
posterior. There is only one venous commissure from the
hyoid vein instead of two as in the posterior arches, and
this commissure opens into the thyroid artery. The art.
thyroidea has hitherto been called the art. mandibularis.
The thyroid artery, after receiving the venous commissure, is
continued into the spiracular artery. The hyoid vein divides
dorsally into two branches, one of which runs back and joins
the dorsa] aorta system, the other runs forward as the carotis
posterior, joins for a short distance behind the hypophysis
with the same vein of the other side, then separates running
one each side of the hypophysis, the vein of each side receiving
a large vein from the spiracular gill.
EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 207
The musculature of the hyoid arch is peculiar in this respect,
that no internal portion of the muscle-tube is segmented off
by the cartilage, and accordingly no adductor is formed. The
musculi interarcuales are also absent, and there is a complicated
system of ligaments fastening the hyomandibular cartilage.
The ventral muscles, on the other hand, are similar to those of
the posterior arches.
With regard to the cartilage of the hyoid arch, development
shows that in the Sharks the upper middle internode, dorsal to
the venous commissure forms the hyomandibular, no separate
basale or dorsal internode is formed; but, as the hyomandi-
bular carries a number of branchial cartilage rays, and also a
dorsal ray, which is homodynamous with the upper extra-
branchial (so-called) cartilage of the gill arches, it follows that
the hyomandibular contains the basale (dorsal internode) of
the hyoid arch.
In the Sharks the first rudiment of the mandibular arch
appears at the level where the hyoid vein joins the spiracular
artery, but unlike the posterior rudiments it consists from
the first of two cartilaginous centres: the under becomes the
mandible, the upper the upper jaw, the so-called palato-quad-
rate. No adductor is formed in the mandibular arch. It has
been generally taught that the masticatory muscle of the jaws
is the homologue of the adductor, but this is not so; no homo-
logue of the adductor is present.
There are no cartilaginous rays on the mandibular arch.
The doctrine, therefore, of Gegenbauer and his followers, that
the lower and upper jaw are parts of a single cartilage arch
equivalent to a posterior gill arch is unfounded.
In the Rays the development of the cartilages of the hyoid
arch is quite different to that described for the Sharks.
There are two cartilage-centres, one near the posterior edge
of the arch, the other near the anterior side, behind the spira-
cular cleft; each cartilage has its own muscle system. The
first cartilage is separated into a dorsal and ventral part by the
venous commissure, and each part bears gill rays. The second
cartilage becomes the hyomandibular, it has its own muscle
278 j. T. CUNNINGHAM.
system which forms the mus. levator. The conclusion which
must be drawn is that the hyomandibular in the Rays is a
remnant of an arch anterior to and entirely distinct from the
hyoid arch, while in the Sharks the dorsal part of the hyoid
arch with its raysis fused with the hyomandibular. According
to Gegenbaur the hyomandibular in the Rays represents only
the mandibular process of the hyomandibular of the Sharks ; if
this were true there would be no rays dorsal to the venous
commissure in the Rays, whereas the fact is that these dorsal
rays exist, but the cartilage they belong to is separate from
the hyomandibular. Dohrn finally suggests that the upper
jaw is also an independent gill arch, and the mandible another,
but for the present leaves the further tracing of the transfor-
mations for more profound investigations. He concludes the
section on the hyoid arch in the Rays with the remark that he
is satisfied to dispel the illusion that we already know what we
want to ascertain.
The spiracular cartilage is next taken in hand. Dohrn has
investigated its origin in Scyllium canicula and catulus, Pris-
tiurus, Mustelus, Raja and Torpedo. He found it always a
single cartilage, and states that there is no foundation for the
theory that it is either an enlarged single ray, or a combina-
tion of rays. It is probably a portion of an independent
arch, but what relation this arch bears to others it is at present
impossible to say. ‘The adductor mandibulz is developed from
the whole of the walls of the mandibular head cavity, no
portion being separated off as an adductor; only one differen-
tiation of a portion occurs, namely, the formation of the levator
maxille superioris from the part lying nearest to the spiracle.
When it has been postulated that the hyoid arch is really
double and contains two arches fused together, it becomes
necessary to inquire what has become of the cleft originally
existing between these two arches. Has the cleft disappeared
without leaving a trace, or has it merely undergone a meta-
morphosis? Dohrn answers that the pair of clefts, i.e. the
endodermal parts of them, have united in the median ventral
line and formed the thyroid gland. This organ arises in the
EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE OHORDATA. 279
embryo in the middle line very far forward as an outgrowth of
endoderm cells close behind the mouth, and subsequently
passes backwards losing its connection with the pharynx. In
a note Dohrn promises in a future study to discuss the spira-
cular cleft of the Selachians and Ganoids, and the pseudobranch
of Teleosteans, and to show that between the mandible and
the hyoid in Teleostean embryos on each side a deep invagina-
tion of the ectoderm occurs, which is to be regarded as the
ectodermal part of the cleft represented by the thyroid. (It is
probable that this invagination is the same as that observed by
other embryologists and diagnosed as the Teleostean represen-
tative of the spiracle.) In another note it is stated that
evidence will at a future time be adduced to show that in the
jaw and hyoid system of Teleosteans five independent visceral
arches are combined : 1, upper jaw; 2, lower jaw; 3, spiracular
cartilage ; 4, hyomandibular ; 5, hyoid.
The Thyroid of Petromyzon.
The subject discussed in Study VIII is the thyroid in
Petromyzon and its homologue in Amphioxus and the Tuni-
cata. In the larval Ammoceetes the first trace of the thyroid
appears at the time when the most anterior branchial diver-
ticula of the endoderm grow out. Its first rudiment is a
diverticulum directed downwards and somewhat forwards, close
beneath the median part of the first pair of branchial diver-
ticula, which is homologous with the spiracular clefts of Sela-
chians and the pseudobranchize of Teleosteans. Between the
stomodzum and enteron on each side runs the most anterior
branchial artery, homologous with the spiracular artery of the
Selachians ; it opens into the cephalic aorta of its own side,
Petromyzon possessing two cephalic aorta one on each side of
the notochord. The growth backwards of the mesoderm of
the velum causes the opening of the thyroid diverticulum to be
pushed farther back, so that it soon comes to lie at the level of
the second pair of branchial sacs, and later between the second
and third. A sagittal ingrowth of mesoderm now divides the
thyroid anteriorly into two halves. On each side another
280 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
pushing in forms the glandular lamella, the uninvaginated part
forming the cover-lamella. In the glandular lamella a differ-
entiation takes places into conical masses of gland-cells, the
apex of the cone turned to the cavity of the gland, and
ordinary ciliated cells. In the advanced larva of Ammoceetes
two ciliated grooves run transversely in the wall of the
pharynx, in front of the gill-sacs, and converge on the median
ventral line to meet in the opening of the thyroid. These
grooves Dohrn has ascertained to be derived from the endo-
dermal sacs which represent the spiracular clefts, and which in
Ammoceetes never acquire an opening to the exterior.
Now the endostyle or hypobranchial groove of Ascidians,
e.g. Cione intestinalis or Salpa, is closely similar in histo-
logical structure to the thyroid of Ammoceetes. There is the
same differentiation into bulbous agglomerations of gland-
cells, and a more even layer of ciliated cells. Moreover, in the
Ascidian there is a pair of ciliated grooves immediately behind
the mouth, which ventrally converge to the hypobranchial
groove, dorsally to the ciliated pit (hypophysis). These
grooves of the Ascidian must be homologous with those of
Ammoceetes, and must therefore represent in the Ascidian the
spiracular clefts. And it follows that Tunicates must be
derived from fishes, not vice versa. The reason suggested
for the transformation is that the thyroid and spiracular clefts
have been converted into mucous-secreting organs to aid in
the conveyance of nourishment to the cesophagus.
In Amphioxus there is not a hypobranchial groove, but a
hypobranchial ridge, but this ridge has the same histological
character as the thyroid in Ammoccetes and the hypobranchial
groove in Ascidians. A homologue of the peripharyngeal
ciliated grooves is not mentioned as occurring in Amphioxus,
and the development of the hypobranchial ridge has not been
studied.
The conclusion drawn from all this is that both Tunicates
and Amphioxus are degenerate fishes derived from ancestors
more or less similar to the Cyclostomata. A difficulty which
arises in considering Dohrn’s arguments is that no reason 1s
EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 281
given why the spiracular endoderm sac should open into the
thyroid endoderm sac, since these were presumably originally
separate; the spiracle being anterior to the hyomandibular,
the thyroid between hyomandibular and hyoid. Dohrn does
not mention this question, being satisfied so far to show that
the condition of the ciliated grooves in Tunicates is directly
derivable from the condition in Ammoccetes. The derivation
of the arrangement in the latter from that in Selachians is not
discussed.
Rudiments of Paired Fins in Petromyzon.
In the ninth Study Dohrn returns again to the question of
the fins. How, he demands, could an animal of the size and
complication of the Cyclostomata obtain for itself organs of
such fundamental effect on the whole organisation as pectoral
and pelvic fins ? The question is perhaps not so convincing as he
thinks ; for, on his own hypothesis, the neural and ventral para-
podia must at one time have arisen, and the theory of the evo-
lution of organs is not at present in such a state as to make it
any more easy to understand how these organs arose than how
limbs could arise in the Cyclostome, unless, indeed, it were
postulated that the segmented vertebrate ancestor, with its
dorsal and ventral parapodia, was a creation into whose pre-
vious origin it were impious to inquire. But what is more to
the point is that, although Gegenbaur believed no rudiment of
fins could be discovered in the Cyclostomata, Dohrn has dis-
covered in Ammoccetes rudiments of muscle-buds similar to
those which in other fishes form the muscles of the unpaired
fins. These buds, however, remain as indifferent cells during
the Ammoceetes stage, and are only differentiated into the fin
muscles when the metamorphosis into Petromyzon takes
place. The buds are given off ventrally as well as dorsally,
and as the dorsal series forms the muscles of the dorsal fin,
the przanal ventral ones must at one time have formed mus-
cles of then existing paired fins. Moreover, there is, accord-
ing to Dohrn, a rudiment of the pelvic fins in Petromyzon,
namely, the longitudinal folds bordering the anus, Below
282 J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
these folds are a pair of muscles, called by Schneider, in his
‘ Beitrage zur vergl. Anatomie der Wirbelthiere,’ the anal fin
muscles. According to Dohrn, these muscles serve to pro-
trude the so-called penis of the male Lamprey. Dohrn raises
the question of the possibility of copulation in the Lamprey, a
possibility which does not really exist, for in the female there
is a protrusible tube at the abdominal pore, which is shorter
but otherwise exactly similar to that of the male. Dohrn
suggests that the anal fin muscles of Schneider are homologous
with the muscles of the pelvic fin in other fishes (Selachians
especially).
Origin of the Vertebrate Paired Eyes.
The most recent study deals with the embryology and phy-
logeny of the Vertebrate eye. It was obvious to previous
embryologists that the nervous part of the eye was originally
in the wall of the brain. Lankester suggested that the an-
cestor was at this time transparent, while Balfour believed that
though the tissues may have been transparent, the original
cause of the outgrowth of the optic vesicle was the covering of
the original superficial eye by the formation of the medullary
tube. But the starting-point of Dohrn’s inquiry is the deve-
lopment of the eye-muscles. Balfour indicated briefly the
origin of these muscles from the most anterior head-cavity.
Marshall (this Journal, vol. xxi) ascertained that only the
rectus internus superior, inferior, and obliquus inferior arose
from the pre-mandibular cavity, while the obliquus superior
arose from the mandibular, the rectus externus from the
hyoid. But Marshall believed that the dorsal parts of the
head cavities from which the eye-muscles were formed were
homologous with myotomes, and not with the ventral celom
in the trunk. Dohrn does not agree with this, and holds that
the dorsal parts, like the ventral, are not homologous with the
myotomes in the trunk, but only with the ventral walls of the
body cavity. As a consequence of this it follows that the eye-
muscles are true muscles of visceral arches, and must have
been originally branchial muscles. The reason why branchial
EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA, 283
muscles came into relation with the eye is that the light
reached the latter, when the medullary tube began to close,
through the ectodermal pit of a preoral gill-cleft. This ecto-
dermal branchial pit is now the lens of the eye, whose peculiar
mode of formation is thus explained. The vascular part of the
same gill arch is retained in the choroid gland of Teleosteans,
which receives its blood supply from the pseudobranchial vein,
and the arteria centralis retinee, which is the efferent artery of
the lens branchia. This hypothesis explains the vessels of the
campanula Halleri, of the pecten of Reptiles and Birds, the em-
bryonic lens vessels of Mammals, as remnants of the blood-
vessels of the branchia represented by the lens. Leaving the
eye, Dohrn next goes on to support his view that aimost the
whole of the head except the brain represents visceral or ven-
tral structures, just as the tail contains only dorsal structures,
and asserts his belief that attempts to estimate the number of
myotomes in the head are all in vain. In his opinion the
cerebral nerves have lost those branches which innervated
myotomes and their derivatives, and have, in consequence of
the extraordinary enlargement and complication of the ventral
region, increased to a corresponding degree their visceral
branches, at the same time having undergone great alterations
in distribution on account of the changes of relative position
among the gill arches. Thus, the attempts of Van Wighe and
others to diagnose dorsal branches of the cranial nerves are
founded in mistaken views. A ramus dorsalis of a spinal nerve
never innervates a mucous tube, any more than the ramus
dorsalis, so called, of a cranial nerve innervates myotomes and
muscles of a dorsal fin. Again, Dohrn points out how necessary
it is to understand more accurately the anatomy and develop-
ment of the vertebrate organs before constructing complete
and simple schemes which reduce the head to a number of
myotomes as formerly to a certain number of vertebre. A
great anatomist once said that if he wished to read romances
he knew better specimens than histories of creation where-
with to amuse himself, 4 propos of which Dohrn points out
that if phylogenies are to be compared with romances it is as
VOL, XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER, U
284. J. T. CUNNINGHAM.
well to remember that the most sensational are not always the
best works of art.
We have thus given a summary of Dohrn’s results and indi-
cated the point of view from which he regards the problem of
vertebrate phylogeny. The speculations formulated in the
‘Ursprung der Wirbelthiere’ have been in some cases sup-
ported in others overthrown by his later researches, but he
still holds strongly to the fundamental thesis that the original
ancestor was a segmented animal more or less similar to an
Annelid, and that the organisation of Cyclostomata, Amphioxus,
and Tunicata can only be explained by profound degeneration.
Whatever the fate of his various theories may be in the future
of morphology, it is certain that his studies form a massive
contribution to the really scientific study of organogeny, and
that his independent attitude and stimulating suggestiveness
of thought are worthy of his favorite motto, ‘“‘ Was fruchtbar
ist allein ist wahr.”
REVIEW.
Patten on the Eyes of Molluscs and Arthropods.
In the last number of the ‘ Mittheilungen’ of the Zoological
Station of Naples appears an extensive article by Dr. William
Patten on the “ Eyes of Molluscs and Arthropods.” The article
contains the record of a number of observations on the structure
of the eye in these animals, which appear to be of considerable
value and importance. Accompanying the record of facts is a variety
of theoretical and speculative statements, which are so extraor-
dinary as not only to call for special notice, but are even likely to
lead some readers to underestimate the value of the observations.
Indeed, the attitude taken by this young and inexperienced
naturalist in criticising the work of his predecessors, and in the
enunciation of astounding general propositions, of the eccentricity
and inadmissibility of which he appears to be altogether uncon-
scious, is one which is greatly to be regretted as likely to diminish
the weight which would otherwise be attached to his statements of
fact, obviously the outcome of industrious investigation.
A large portion of the memoir deals with the eyes of Mollusca,
of which we shall not here say anything further. The most im-
portant new result recorded in the memoir is that relating to the
essential structure of the compound eyeof Arthropoda. Dr. Patten
appears to have discovered that Grenacher is wrong in supposing
that the cells of the crystalline cones are the matrix cells of the
corneal lenses. He has found a distinct layer of epidermic matrix
cells, which produce the cuticular lenses, and were entirely missed
by Grenacher. This new layer is therefore the equivalent of
the vitreous layer of the monomeniscous Arthropod eye. The
crystalline cone cells are, on the other hand, according to Patten,
part of the retinal apparatus, and the rhabdom of Grenacher, which
forms a sort of stalk to the group of crystalline cone cells, is really
formed by them, and is not a cuticular product of the retinula cells
of Grenacher, which surround it, and, according to that observer,
produce it. Dr. Patten’s observations on these points require con-
firmation, but appear to be likely to prove correct. As to nerve-
endings, his observations are more doubtful, since he has committed
himself in a somewhat over-confident manner to a series of specula-
tive generalisations on the subject of nerve-endings, for the formu-
lation of which it is only too obvious that neither his knowledge of
facts nor his acquaintance with the work of contemporary histolo-
gists qualify him. He objects altogether to the term “nerve-end
cell,” and holds that all the cells of the Arthropod ommateum are sup-
plied with nerve-fibres, the chief of which are those which, according
286 REVIEW.
to him, form a meshwork in the crystalline cone cells, being derived
from an axial nerve-fibre, which runs up the rhabdom in order to
spread itself out in those cells. It certainly cannot be at once ad-
mitted that the fibres which Patten has thus traced in so many
directions are nerve-fibres, though possibly they are so. On the
other hand, contrary to his assertions in reference to the Arthropod
eye, Patten lays down the law in a dogmatic fashion in regard to
the Molluscan hypodermis. “The nerves,” he says, “must termi-
nate between the cells, and probably extend to their very outer
ends.’ The “must’’ of the foregoing assertion depends on the cor-
rectness of a speculative account of the phylogenetic development
of a nervous system, for many of the details of which Dr. Patten has
no conclusive grounds to urge. At present, it may be remarked,
histologists have been led, by the observations of Ranvier and others,
to admit that nerve-fibres do in some regions terminate between the
cells of the epidermis of Vertebrata, but it is also very generally
held that nerve-fibres of organs of special sense terminate in the
substance of special nerve-end cells.
Dr. Patten’s observations are possibly correct, but he does not
strengthen the confidence likely to be placed in them by dogmatism
of the kind in which he indulges. Our knowledge of the relation
of nerve-fibres to nerve-end cells is admittedly very unsatisfactory,
and will require observations over aud above those of Dr. Patten
to put it on a satisfactory footing.
Such being the main facts of importance which Dr. Patten seeks
to establish, we may pass to a brief notice of some of his more
astonishing theoretical statements. In the course of the extensive
memoir (over 200 pages) which Dr, Patten has devoted to this
subject, it is very seldom that we find a continuous straightforward
and intelligible account of the facts, with a sober discussion of pro-
babilities as to matters in which his own observations are im con-
flict with those of other observers, or are incomplete. Dr. Patten
is continually introducing into his record, with an unbecoming
assumption of wisdom and authority, speculations or statements of
a theoretical nature, which are so extravagant and betray so
much ignorance as to make the reader regret very heartily that
they have been allowed to disfigure a treatise which must on other
grounds command attention. For instance:—1l. On p. 625 the
description of the eye of Penzus is introduced with the following
utterance :—‘“‘ The great impetus that modern zoological science
has received from comparative anatomy has not been due so much to
more subtle or able comparisons as to a more perfect knowledge of
the structure of single forms.” How there is to be comparative
anatomy without comparison, or how comparison is to proceed
without an increased knowledge of the single forms compared, is not
explained by Dr. Patten. The sentence, so far as it means any-
thing, appears to be a negation of the value of scientific morphology
altogether. This, however, is a trifle compared with what follows,
REVIEW. 287
and we quote it merely to show Dr. Patten’s appreciation of the
scope and tendency of morphological research.
2. A few lines below the passage above quoted we find the follow-
ing dictum. ‘“ We must expect a certain amount of structural
uniformity in those organs which have to carry by the same means
the same forms of energy to similar perceptive centres.” This
seems to be almost a truism; if the ‘same means” are employed
for such a purpose we certainly must expect uniformity. But
what does our author mean by “ carrying the same forms of energy
to similar perceptive centres?” He is speaking of the eye; what
is the form of energy which he imagines to be carried by means of
the eye and optic nerves to a perceptive centre? A perusal of his
final chapter explains this paradoxical allusion. Our readers will
hardly credit the statement in the first instance, but it is actually
true that Dr. Patten supposes that the energy of sunlight is
carried with quantitative significance by nerves from the eye to
nerve centres. He writes (p. 712): “In plants this sun energy is
used in the chlorophyll grains, for in them the production of
organic matter takes place. But in animals it is probable that the
pigment granules are only the receivers of energy—the heliophags,
as we shall call them—while this energy is transmitted by nerve-
fibres to centres where it is consumed in the production of proto-
plasmic compounds.” ‘This astounding theory of “ heliophags ” is
only part of a general theory of ‘“ dynamophagy,’’ which is deve-
loped at great length by Dr. Patten in his final chapter.
“ Living bodies,” he says, “are distinguished by their power to
absorb matter and energy, and from them produce high compounds
by whose disintegration force is liberated as motion. This se-
quence of events is vitality. .... We have only to deal with the
second of these processes, the absorption of energy or dynamo-
phagy, and more especially with the absorption of solar energy or
heliophagy.”” Eyes then are primarily not organs of sight but
heliophags, organs for the absorption of solar energy, and only
secondarily acquire a sensory significance! Similarly auditory
organs are declared to be absorbers of the energy of sound vibra-
tions, whilst “the energy of coarser vibrations, of pressure, contact,
or movement ’’ is “‘absorbed” by tactile hairs and “ that of gases,
solutions or chemical compounds,” by means of taste-cells!
It is thus coolly proposed by Dr. Patten to revolutionise all the
established conclusions of modern physiology in regard to the
nervous system, of which conclusions he, it is only fair to say,
appears to be entirely ignorant. He actualiy imagines that the
energy received from external bodies is quantitatively transmitted
from the surface of an animal by its nerves to the nerve-centres and
there made use of. It is hardly necessary to point out that such a
notion is simply preposterous, and that to speak of “ the absorption
of energy” as he does, betrays not only a fundamental ignorance
of physiology but also of physics. The energy of the nervous
288 REVIEW.
system and of the animal body generally, is, it is scarcely necessary
to say, taken into the body in the form of potential energy of
food-stuffs, and exists there as the potential energy of the proteids
or higher chemical combinations which constitute protoplasm.
All that the sense organs do in the way of bringing the ‘actual’
energy external to the animal body into relation with the nerve-
centres, is to furnish special trains of explosive substance (i.e.
of substances whose potential is suddenly convertible into actual
energy), so that energy of various forms external to the body is
able to initiate at appropriate points, and by means of special
apparatus the conversion within the body of potential into actual
energy, the amount of which has no relation whatever to the
amount of the incident energy by which the explosion was started.
Precisely as the energy liberated in a gun barrel is not the energy
of the fall of the hammer which explodes the detonator, nor pro-
portional to it, so is the energy of the animal body entirely distinct
from the energy which sets its various sense organs in operation.
The sense organs of the animal body may be compared to the
detonating apparatus ; and Dr. Patten might as well tell us that
the purpose of a gun’s trigger is to absorb energy and transmit it
to the ball, whilst ignoring altogether the gunpowder, as to talk
about sense organs being ‘“ dynamophags ” and eyes being “ absor-
bers ” of the “ beneficial effects of the sunlight.”
3. In elaborating his doctrine Dr. Patten commits himself to
many erronous statements, which show how little he is qualified to
deal with the subject. We may notea few of these. Onp. 709 Dr.
Patten writes of the “animal pigment, especially that of colourless
plastids.” Animal pigment is declared to be “a living sub-
stance!” It is further stated, without the slightest attempt to sup-
port so startling a conclusion, that the “ pigment granules of animal
tissues are modified chlorophyll granules!” Dr. Patten not only
expresses new ideas but also has invented a new chemical termino-
logy. He writes of “waste products, such as carbonic acid gas,
sulphides, ammoniates and ureates.’’ His knowledge of chlorophyll
and of the steps by which animal pigment granules are to be derived
from chlorophyll granules may be judged of by the following:
‘Chlorophyll, as is well known, is extremely unstable and soluble
in many fluids, even in water.”
4, The statement that “it is well known that pigment, like chlo-
rophyll, is dependent for its existence upon the sunlight,” is totally
at variance with fact. Instances of the formation of chlorophyll in
plants which are excluded from sunlight are known, and still more
numerous instances of animals which develop brilliant pigment
although living in what is relatively to ordinary daylight, darkness.
No doubt in the race, pigment must havea direct dependence on the
access of sunlight; in the absence of light it cannot be of service to
the organism. But there is no evidence to show either that chloro-
phyll or pigment are dependent for their existence upon sunlight.
REVIEW. 289
5. In green plants, according to Patten, “ chlorophyll is without
doubt the substance affected by sunlight,” and ‘the only rational
supposition is that pigment is the substance in animals directly
affected by the sunlight.”” Itis somewhat impertinent of Dr. Patten
to accuse those who may not assent to his crude theories of enter-
taining irrational suppositions. Most physiologists will remember
that there are not a few simple experiments which demonstrate
that protoplasm devoid of pigment is affected by sunlight and by
its visible as opposed to its thermal factors. For instance, Engel-
mann has shown that the colourless Protozoon Pelomyxa contracts
when exposed suddenly to sunlight, and the retina of albinoes is
“directly affected ” by sunlight.
6. It is a matter for regret that Dr. Patten has not made himself
acquainted with the facts as to the action of light on protoplasm. One
of the most important lines of inquiry in the minute study of the eyes
of Arthropods, Molluscs, and other Invertebrates, is to be found in
an exact determination of the presence or absence of pigment in the
nerve-end cells and of the distribution of pigment granules in those
cells. The question is a difficult one to investigate, because the
observer generally is compelled to dissolve the pigment present in
an ommateum before a satisfactory study of the cells can be made.
Dr. Patten, in the more valuable portion of his memoir containing the
record of his observation, has not given so much attention to this
matter as we could wish. It is remarkable that whilst he indulges
in such “tall talk’ with regard to pigment and heliophagy and the
fundamental relation of pigment to this newly discovered function,
yet he himself professes (we do not throw doubt on his observa-
tion) to have traced the chief optic nerve-fibres of the Arthropod
polymeniscous eye to the colourless transparent cells of the
erystal cones. It is evidently a subject which does not trouble
him much since he quite recklessly attributes to other authorities
on Arthropod eyes, statements with regard to the presence or
absence of pigment in nerve-end cells which are the reverse of
those made by the gentlemen in question. Thus at p. 670 he says:
“‘ Let us take for instance one of the lateral eyes of Scorpio and
it will be found, according to Graber and Lankester, that the om-
mateum consists of ommatidia each one composed of five central
colourless cells or retinophore.” The reader who has followed
us so far will not be surprised to learn that the particular cells in
question were described and figured by Lankester as pigmented
and not colourless, and were made by him the text of a discussion
as to the significance of pigment in nerve-erd cells.
7. It is not, however, of any use to expect accuracy of observa-
tion as to the contents of books and contemporary memoirs from
Dr. Patten. He is far too much engrossed with laying down new
principles of physiology and expounding to a benighted world the
results of his philosophic meditations. As he himself says (p. 672),
since doctors disagree, he intends to choose his own course, picking
290 REVIEW.
out such facts as suit his theories and denying the existence of
those which do not.
It is not to be expected that a writer who openly professes such
principles should quote accurately the observations of other people.
At the same time this incapacity for accurate observation of books
and the neglect to observe at all such books as a text-book
of physiology, and one also of physics, must lead Dr. Patten’s
reader to consider the possibility that his incapacity for correct
observation extends also to other matters.
8. To continue our notes. On p. 685 we read: ‘“ We must admit
that the possibility of regarding the phaosphere found in Euscor-
pius italicus by Lankester as an aborted nucleus is not so
remote as he would have us believe.” Whether the phaosphere can
possibly be an aborted nucleus or not may be an open question ; it
is but another instance of Patten’s extraordinary inaccuracy when
he states that Lankester “ would have us believe’ anything on the
subject. The matter was not discussed by Lankester at all.
9. On p. 717, Dr. Patten declares that he often hears “it said of
any pigmented spot that it is not an eye, but simply a meaningless
collection of pigment,’ and also alludes to “those who believe that
pigment is a waste product.” We trust that it is not in the excel-
lent Zoological Station of Naples, where Dr. Patten has recently
been pursuinghis studies, that he has heard the above quoted remark.
Was it made by a fellow student at Trieste or in the laboratory of
Leuckart at Leipzig? In any case it seems to be a pity that
Dr. Patten should have repeated these disparaging remarks con-
cerning pigment spots, because no sensible person attaches any
importance to them, and it is scarcely worth while to adduce, as Dr.
Patten does, the well-known facts which render them unjustifiable.
10. On p. 716 we find it stated that “an organ most perfectly
adapted for the condensation and absorption of the greatest amount
of (solar) energy is likewise perfectly constructed for the perception
of objects.”” The concentration of light is stated to be the condi-
tion essential for the most perfect “ heliophagous organ,” and it is
declared that ‘‘ the amount of energy absorbed weuld depend upon
the most perfect condensation of light upon a given area.” One
surely would expect a writer on the theory of eyes to make himself
acquainted with the simpler facts known as to the properties of
lenses! But it seems that Dr. Patten has not found time to do
this. The rays of light concentrated by a lens are, it is hardly
necessary to say, merely those rays which fall upon the surface of
the lens. Hence if the mere absorption of the energy of these
rays is all that is needed, there is no advantage whatever in the
provision of a lens. The naked epidermic surface of an area equal
to that of a lens would present a perfect instrument for the “ absorp-
tion” of solar energy, and, indeed, would ‘“‘ absorb” more than can
the retina with the lens intervening between it and the surrounding
medium. In plants accordingly we find no lenses but a simple
REVIEW. 291
exposure of green surface to the solar rays. On the other hand if,
as is the case according to received theories, the process which goes
on in the retina is not important as an absorption or (to use a
better term) a conversion of energy quantitatively, but only quali-
tatively, that is to say, in respect of initiating active changes in
the nerve-end cells with the subsequent consequences of which the
amount of energy converted has not so much to do as has its quality,
then we can understand that a lens which disposes the solar rays on
the retinal surface in a manner conducive to the localisation of their
differing quality, has importance and value.
11. A melancholy instance of the extent to which Dr. Patten acts
upon the principle of bending facts to theory, even at the risk of
the grossest disrespect to contemporary authors of acknowledged
competency, is found in his treatment of Sars’s observations on the
luminous organs of Euphausia. Patten wishes to consider these
organs as eyes, and instances of his hypothetical ‘“ heliophags ;”’
accordingly he suggests that Sars was misled by flashings of reflected
light when he stated that they gave out light at intervals. Ina
note at the end of Patten’s paper the editor of the ‘ Mittheil-
ungen ’ very honestly states that Messrs. Paul Miyer and Giesbrecht
have in consequence examined three living specimens of Euphausia,
and entirely confirm Sars’s observations and refute the unjust
insinuations made by Dr. Patten.
12. A similar unwarrantable adhesion to theory, in the face of
opposing facts, is seen in Dr. Patten’s attempt to evade the conse-
quences of the observations of Lankester and Bourne on the lateral
eyes of Scorpions and Limulus, in regard to the latter of which
animals they have the confirmatory evidence of Grenacher. Dr.
Patten has propounded a theory of the Arthropod eye, to the effect
that itis in all cases derived from a vesicle formed by invagi-
nation of the epidermis, and consists, therefore, of three layers of
cells, viz. the two layers of the flattened vesicle and the epidermic
layer which grows in front of it during its nipping off and detach-
ment from the point of invagination. It is probably true that this
is the structure and the ancestral! history of the ordinary compound
eyes of Crustacea and Insects: but there is no justification in the
small area of facts observed by Dr. Patten himself for including
all Arthropod eyes, all ocelli wherever situated and however
constructed under this type. It is not clear why Dr. Patten
insists on the universality of his generalisation, applying it to
groups of Arthropods which he knows nothing about, and pre-
suming to deny the accuracy of observations which he has not
taken the trouble to test. Lankester and Bourne described the
ommateum of the lateral eyes of Scorpions as being “ mono-
stichous,”’ like the great lateral eyes of Limulus. They figured sec-
tions of the lateral eyes of both Kuscorpius italicus and of
Androctonus funestus. Their sections are in existence, and
leave not the slightest doubt as to the accuracy of the statement
VOL. XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER. x
292 REVIEW.
that these lateral eyes consist of simple depressions of the epi-
dermis, there being no folding in of the edges of the depression so
as to form a vesicle, and consequently no duplication or triplication
of the layers. The fact thus established, that there is no vitreous
layer in certain Arthropod eyes intervening between the cuticle and
the nerve-end cells, naturally enough is an obstacle to Dr. Patten’s
sweeping generalisation. After citing the observations in question
he dismisses them with the cool remark : “ For theoretical reasons I
am obliged to assume that this layer (the vitreous) is always present.”
Were Dr, Patten not dominated by theories, one more extrava-
gant than another, he would not have “assumed”’ anything about
such an important matter, but would simply have taken a Scor-
pion (common enough at Naples), and cut some sections of its
lateral eyes. Dr. Patten, however, openly professes that he has
made it his habit in constructing his views on the structure of eyes
to “choose his own course, picking out those facts which seem to
point in the right direction ;” that is to say, which support a favourite
theory or amplify a startling generalisation, and ignoring or flatly
denying, without troubling to bring them to the only test recognised
by loyal students of nature, those which cannot be thus used.
18. Finally, we must point out that, in expressing his opinions, Dr.
Patten often shows as great a want of manners as of fundamental
knowledge. He objects to the supposition that in more complex
eyes some of the pigmentiferous cells are due to intrusive connective
tissue which has penetrated between the cells of epidermic origin.
One author, he states, “has carried this supposition to an absurd
degree.’ There is nothing “absurd” in the supposition, as Dr.
Patten would recognise were he acquainted with the histology of
the epidermis. In Lumbricus, Hirudo, and even in some Verte-
brates, the occurrence of such intrusive connective tissue is a de-
monstrable and admitted fact; and in relation to the eye of
Arthropoda it appears to have been actually observed taking place,
according to Kingsley’s recent account of his investigation of the
development of the eye of Crangon (‘ Zoolog. Anzeiger,’ No. 234).
But in any case it ill becomes a novice to charge his masters and
teachers with “ absurdity.’’ It should be enough for him to demon-
strate an error (if he can) and to employ respectful language in
doing so.
Grenacher is subjected by Dr. Patten to even more objectionable
treatment. On p.728, this young American, after citing an opinion
published by Grenacher, says: “This he knows is absurd, and
cannot be true.” The expression is offensive and discreditable.
On the whole we cannot congratulate Dr. Dohrn on his con-
tributor. There are, no doubt, some laborious observations con-
tained in this ill-regulated production ; but it is a question whether
their value will counterbalance the effect on the author’s reputation
of the evidence which it bears of his want of both scientific and
social education.
The Anatomy of the Madreporarian Coral
Fungia.
By
Gilbert C. Bourne, B.A., F.L.S.,
New College, Oxford.
With Plates XXIII, XXIV and XXV.
DurRinG a visit, extending from the middle of September,
1885, to the middle of January, 1886, to the island of Diego
Garcia, an atoll lying in S. lat. 7° 13’, E. long. 72° 23’, I
was able to collect and preserve a large number of specimens
of Fungia dentata, which form the subject of the present
memoir.
The Fungize were very abundant within the lagoon, espe-
cially among the knolls and banks of growing coral on its east
side, where, at low spring tides, they could be collected by
scores from depths ranging from three to ten feet. They
occur singly, more usually in groups of five or six, among the
massive Astreids and Madrepores of which the knolls are
chiefly composed, usually lying in a hollow or basin, or half
hidden beneath the spreading branches of some large Madre-
pora, and are thus protected from being swept away by the
tides which set strongly across the knolls.
Specimens of a diameter of three inches and more were
extremely common, but it was very rarely that I could find
any of smaller size; the smallest that I was able to procure
measures as much as ‘two inches across, and a prolonged
search failed to reward me with a single smaller specimen, or
VOL. XXVII, PART 3.—NEW SER. Y
294 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
with an example of the nurse-stock.! In this I was very much
disappointed, for Professor Moseley succeeded in finding a
specimen at Tahiti in the course of a few hours’ search, whilst
I was unsuccessful day after day. Although the Fungi at
Tahiti lay in only three inches of water, and the search was
an easy one, he mentions the great difficulty he had in finding
the nurse-mass among the numerous adult forms on the reef ;
and in my case, where they lay in three feet or more of water,
it is possible that I may have overlooked the small nurse-stock
and the smaller recently detached Fungiz; this is the more
likely since both the nurse-stocks and the young forms would
probably remain hidden beneath the great flat plates of dead
Madrepore which form the basis of the mounds of living coral.
Yet I can scarcely believe this to be the case, for not only did
I search very closely by wading and diving among the corals,
but I frequently turned over the above-mentioned flat plates
of coral-rock and examined their under surfaces without ever
finding a single example, nor did I ever meet with a group of
very small forms, nor with anything like the group of nurse-
stocks attached to the corallum of an old and dead Fungia, as
figured by Stutchbury (39). I am inclined to believe that
sexual reproduction followed by asexual reproduction by
budding from a nurse-stock takes place in Fungia only
at certain seasons of the year, and that it was not in
progress during my stay at Diego Garcia. This seems the
more probable because I have found no trace either of ova or
of spermatozoa in any of the large specimens which I have
brought home for examination. Reproduction in Fungia
appears to be effected also by budding and by simple fission.
In the British Museum there are several examples of the
former process, in which indubitable buds can be seen growing
from the base of a large Fungia. The buds always arise from
1 Semper (38) calls the nurse-stock of Fungia a Strobila, but as this
name was originally applied to the dividing parent-stock of Aurelia, which is
essentially different from the bud-producing parent-stock of Fungia, and since
it is objectionable to use the same name for two very different phenomena, I
use the word nurse-stock for the fixed parent of Fungia.
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 295
the base, and it is not unlikely that they may be formed only
when, by some accident, the coral has been overturned.
Examples of fission are rare, but I have in my possession a
dead corallum which is nearly divided into two separate
Fungi, and in which the axial fosses are already completely
separated from one another and form mouths excentrically
placed on peristomial discs inclined towards one another at a
wide angie. There is a similar specimen in the British
Museum. In the same collection there is a very good specimen
of a nurse-stock brought by H.M.S. Alert from the Seychelles,
found on March 5th, 1883. This is a young specimen from
which the first bud has not yet been detached, and the soft
tissues still extend down over the outside of the corallum to
the basal disc ; unfortunately the spirit in which it was con-
tained has been allowed to evaporate, and the soft tissues are
unfit forexamination. But since it was found only two months
later than the date of my search at Diego Garcia and in the
Same seas, it may be taken as an objection to my opinion
given above, that there is a special season of sexual followed
by asexual reproduction from a nurse-stock in Fungia. It is
quite possible that sexual reproduction may be very much
economised in these corals and is of rare occurrence, the
maintenance of the numbers of a species being ensured firstly
by the budding off of an indefinite number of forms from the
sexually produced nurse-stock, and secondly, by the simple
asexual processes of budding and fission above described.
The whole history of the reproduction of these forms is very
imperfectly understood, although it presents many problems
of the greatest interest. A naturalist travelling in coral-seas
should not fail to try and secure some specimens of the nurse-
stocks carefully preserved in spirit, as well as specimens of the
young free forms recently separated from the parent-stock. To
this should be added any observations that may be possible on
the relative frequency of the nurse-stocks, on the frequency of
budding or fission, and on the rate of growth. I was unable
to carry out an extended series of observations on the Fungize
at Diego Garcia, for the knolls on which they were found lay
296 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
“in the lagoon at some distance from my hut, and want of space
and appliances prevented me from constructing proper aquaria
in which to study them at leisure. Such as I tried to keep
alive in buckets and tubs full of sea water soon perished, the
water rapidly becoming foul in the hot climate unless a
constant stream is kept through it. As for placing any indi-
viduals of Fungia or masses of any other coral in a particular
spot on the beach where they might be readily accessible for
study, a short experience showed me the impracticability of
the suggestion. Placed on the lagoonward beech in smooth
water they were quickly covered with and destroyed by the
sand ; on the external shores they were at once rolled over and
over and destroyed by the great waves which are capable of
moving masses weighing 2 cwt. and more, and throwing them
up in a sort of low wall all round the island.
The specimens which I brought home for examination were
killed with hot corrosive sublimate, and afterwards treated
with picric acid and preserved in 70 per cent. spirit. In
this way I was able to preserve several specimens with the
short stumpy tentacles fully expanded, as is shown in fig. 1.
Although the general features of the corallum of Fungia
have been well known for a long time, and have more recently
been carefully described by Professor Martin Duncan (5),
the arrangement of the soft tissues, and their relation to the
corallum has not yet been studied. G. von Koch, it is true,
has recently published a few remarks on the subject (23) and
gives a figure, but the latter is incorrect in details, and the
description merely amounts to a statement that the general
anatomy of Fungia corresponds with that of the other Madre-
poraria; he does not attempt to give a detailed description of
the internal structure. As any attempt to remodel the classi-
fication of the Madreporaria must depend on an intimate know-
ledge of the relation of the soft parts to the corallum, I shall
give in the following pages as detailed a description of the
anatomy as circumstances will permit.
The family Fungidz was estabiished by Dana in 1846.
In his splendidly illustrated work on the ‘ Zoophytes of the
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 297
Wilkes’ Exploring Expedition,’ he gives descriptions of several
species, with drawings of the hard parts and the living animals.
To the latter I shall have occasion to refer further on. The
family thus established was made the subject of a memoir by
Milne-Edwards and Haime, in which many new species were
described, and the characteristic features of the corallum were
noted. The same authors give a full description of the family
in the ‘ Histoire des Coralliaires, but confine themselves to
the study of the corallum throughout. Professor Martin
Duncan has lately published a memoir on the same family,
dealing especially with the hard structures, and to his account
I have little or nothing to add. The following description of
the corallum is taken principally from his paper (5).
The corallum is simple and discoidal, the base usually rather
concave, and the upper surface convex. The theea is distinct
and confined to the basal surface ; it is continuous in the cen-
tral part of the disc, but in its more peripheral parts it is per-
forated by numerous apertures, which lead through it into the
interseptal loculi. The septa are numerous, arranged in seven
cycles in the moderately large forms, and are continuous; the
free margins of the septa are dentate. The theca is orna-
mented with radiating rows of spines, each row corresponding
in position with a septum above, and representing a costa.
The axial fossa is elongate and shallow. The columella is tra-
beculate and rudimentary. Special structures named synap-
ticula are characteristic of the Fungidz ; they consist of nearly
vertical or curved rows of bars, bridging over the space between
and connecting the lower portions of two contiguous septa.
By them the lower parts of the interseptal loculi are divided
up into nearly vertical channels, bounded on two sides by
synapticula, and on the other two by the septa. Excellent
figures of the synapticula are given by Professor Duncan.
The flat discoid shape of Fungia is not a characteristic of
the genus, but occurs in other groups of the Madreporaria,
e.g. Deltocyathus among the Turbinolide, Stephano-
phyllia and Leptopenus among the Eupsammide. The
flat shape is a secondary effect produced by the mode of
298 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
growth, for in its youngest stage the corallum of the nurse-
stock of Fungia is cup-shaped and resembles a Caryophyllia,
having a distinct lateral theca, and a basal disc by which it is
attached. In the course of subsequent growth the peristome
expands laterally, so that the nurse-stock already shows traces
of the discoid shape before any young forms are set free; this
is very well seen in the specimen dredged by the “Alert,” re-
ferred to above. The separation of the young Fungia from
the nurse-stock takes place at a short distance below the edge
of the peristome, so that only a small portion of the lateral
theca of the nurse-stock passes into the free form. As growth
proceeds the peripheral ends of the septa are the seats of the
greatest activity in the deposition of calcareous matter, each
septum at once growing outwards and sending off calcareous
processes from its lower edge, which meet and fuse with those
of adjoining septa to form the perforate theca. Thus, the in-
crease in size of the coral proceeds almost entirely in a hori-
zontal direction, bringing about the discoid shape of the adult.
The corallum of a young Fungia just set free from the nurse-
stalk has a circular opening beneath, which leads into the
interseptal loculi and marks the point of former attachment ;
this hole is soon filled up by the deposition of calcareous
tissue, which remains as a small boss in the centre of the base
of the disc, marking the space which represents the basal disc
of the attached coral. The remainder of the under surface isa
thecal structure, the more central imperforate part of which is
probably that portion of the lateral theca of the nurse-stalk
above the line of detachment, the outer and perforate part
being derived from a fusion of the lower ends of the septa, and
not intimately connected with the synapticula, as I think after
a careful examination of the fresh corallum,though on this point
I am at variance with Professor Duncan. The series of figures
3—8 show how the discoid shape is derived from the cup-
shaped coral by lateral growth. The theca of Fungia, although
entirely confined to the basal surface, and perforated by nume-
rous apertures leading into the interseptal loculi, is quite homo-
logous with the theca of other Madreporaria, and bears similar
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 299
relations to the mesenteries and the ceelenteron, as I shall
describe further on. It is important to notice that the theca
is formed, in the course of outward growth, from the fused
ends of contiguous septa, as is stated by G. von Koch
‘to be the case in the lateral thece of other cup-shaped
Madreporaria.
I shall use throughout the same terminology as Fowler in
in his admirable paper on “‘Coral Anatomy” (9); but since
the flattened form of Fungia makes it a little difficult to dis-
tinguish “ base” from ‘ basal disc” in a general description,
I shall make use of the terms ‘oral surface”? and “ aboral
surface,” the former including the mouth and peristome, the
latter the theca and basal disc.
Drawings of living Fungiz have been given by Eschscholtz,
Quoy and Gaimard, and Dana. ‘The first of these gives a
tolerably correct figure, but only four cycles of tentacles are
represented, the more peripheral cycles not being noticed.
Quoy and Gaimard (33) figure two species of Fungia under
the name of Fongies a grosses tentacules (Fungia
crassitentaculata). These are remarkable for the great
length of the tentacles, which are represented as scattered
irregularly over the disc. Milne-Edwards and Haime, not
noticing the regular arrangement of the tentacles in Esch-
scholtz’s figure, say: ‘‘ Toute la partie supérieure du corps de
Vanimal, correspondante a la partie lamellifere du polypier, est
garnie des tentacules épais qui ne sont pas groupés en forme de
couronne comme chez la plupart des Zoanthaires.” Dana’s
figure of Fungia lacera in the ‘ Zoophytes of the Wilkes’
Exploring Expedition’ is reproduced in his book on ‘ Corals
and Coral Islands,’ and he says in the latter work: “ The ten-
tacles are scattered over the disc instead of being arranged in
regular circles. It is evident from the figure that the appa-
rent circles, where there is more than one, in Actiniz, arise
from the crowding of the series of tentacles together, and also
that the inner row of tentacles in polyps is the older. It will
be noticed also that each of the tentacles stands where a new
ridge or calcareous septum in the coral begins.” That the
300 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
circles of tentacles in Actinic do not arise in the manner here
suggested is sufficiently proved by the researches of Lacaze
Duthiers and the Hertwigs, but I have not seen it contradicted
of Fungia that the tentacles are scattered irregularly over the
disc. Yet so far is this from being the case, that on first
taking the living animal out of the sea I was immediately
struck with the arrangement of the tentacles in definite cycles.
Fig. 1 is a drawing of F. dentata, somewhat contracted by
spirit, but with the short stumpy tentacles still expanded.
Their arrangement will be at once understood by a comparison
of the drawing with the diagram (fig. 2).
Each tentacle is placed, not, as Dana says, on the innermost
extremity of each septum, but on a slight elevation of the
upper edge of each septum near its innermost extremity ; from
the point of attachment of the tentacle the septum is con-
tinued obliquely downwards and inwards towards the axial
fossa, none but the last two cycles ending at any great dis-
tance from it. Since the tentacles correspond exactly in
position with the septa, what is stated of the arrangement of
the one holds equally good of the other.
There are twelve primary septa, of which ten reach the
mouth, two being rather shorter than the others and placed
opposite each end of the long axis of the mouth. The ten-
tacles placed on the inner extremities of these septa overhang
the mouth, but are small and degenerate.
Both Lacaze Duthiers (7) and von Koch (21) describe
twelve septa as rising simultaneously in the first cycle, making
the prime number of septa twelve instead of six. According
to the latter six alternate septa grow faster than the others,
giving the appearance of two cycles of six each; this is appa-
rently not the case in Fungia whose twelve septa of the first
order are, with the exception above mentioned, of equal size.
There are twelve septa of the second order alternating with
those of the first ; they reach very nearly to the mouth and are
all of equal length; the tentacles corresponding with them
form, with those of the first cycle, a ring surrounding the
mouth.
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 301
There are twelve pairs of septa of the third order. Each
pair of this order embraces a septum of the first order. The
fourth order contains twenty-four pairs of septa, each pair
embracing alternately a septum of the first and a septum of
the second order.
The fifth and sixth orders also contain twenty-four pairs of
septa each. Those of the fifth order are the longer, and each
pair embraces a septum of the first and second orders alter-
nately ; those of the sixth order are much shorter, and each
pair embraces a septum of the third order.
These last two orders, the fifth and sixth, very possibly
represent only one complete cycle of septa and tentacles. But
since the difference in the length of the septa shows a differ-
ence in their time of origin I have thought it better to keep
them separate.
The seventh order contains ninety-six pairs of septa, with
their corresponding tentacles. The septa are extremely short
and rudimentary ; the tentacles are minute and placed close to
the circumference of the disc.
The sequence of the septa is 1, 7, 5, 7, 4, 7,
Beni, OF i eth Oy 0 Ay F530; V5) 05 1, O05 05 45,05
system.
The tentacles are arranged in six tolerably definite circles at
different distances from the mouth, as may be seen in figs. 1
and 2. The arrangement both of tentacles and septa is very
regular and easily made out at each end of the long axis of the
mouth, but it becomes more irregular and obscure at the sides.
Thus, contrary to previous statements, Fungia is perfectly
regular, and agrees with other Madreporaria in the arrange-
ment of tentacles and septa. The tentacles, which are small
and club shaped in most species, are correctly figured by
Dana. The remaining external features do not call for special
notice and may be understood by reference to fig. 1.
To examine the internal structure, I decalcified some speci-
mens in nitric acid solution, and afterwards stained and cut
sections from them in the usual way. Another specimen I
half decalcified and dissected, and further made use of the
Gifeoncte Os te
5, 7, 1; in each
302 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
method invented by G. von Koch, to study the relations of the
hard and soft parts in situ. This method, which is described
in the ‘ Proceedings of the Zoological Society,’ 1880, p. 41,
yields valuable results with smaller corals, but requires con-
siderable experience, and is not wholly satisfactory when so
large a coral as Fungia is dealt with.
Von Koch, in a sbort note on the anatomy of Fungia and
other Madreporaria, published in the beginning of this year,
rightly says that its structure is essentially the same as that of
other Madreporaria, but he makes no mention of the peculi-
arities which obtain from the relation of the soft parts to the
synapticula, and his diagram is incorrect in some particulars
(23).
The Mesenteries.—It is obvious that, since the lower
parts of the interseptal loculi are broken up by synapticula,
there must be some corresponding modification of structure in
the mesenteries, if the latter structures are present in Fungia.
Professor Duncan was so much struck with this in his studies
on the corallum that he was led to express a doubt whether
mesenteries could exist at all (5). Transverse sections show
that mesenteries do exist, and that in all their essential charac-
ters they have the arrangement typical of Hexactinian
Actinaria. They are arranged in pairs, each pair being dis-
tinguished by the arrangement of its longitudinal muscle-fibres,
which are placed on the adjacent faces of the two mesenteries
composing the pair, except in the case of the two pairs of
directive mesenteries, one pair at each end of the long axis of
the mouth, in which the longitudinal muscle-fibres are placed
on the reverse sides. The space included between each pair
of mesenteries is an entocele (Fowler, 9) and in each entocele
there is a septum. There are seven orders of mesenteries in
the Fungia which I am describing, corresponding to the
seven orders of septa.
The primary and secondary mesenteries are attached to the
stomodzeum, and in their upper parts traverse the whole space
from the mouth to the periphery of the disc. The tertiaries
are not attached to the stomodzum, but reach nearly to it.
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 803
The remaining orders are of constantly decreasing length, the
septenaries being very minute. All the mesenteries are firmly
attached by their upper border to the peristome.
In the upper portions of the interseptal loculi there are no
synapticula; here the mesenteries are free to radiate across
the whole space between the mouth and the periphery of the
disc, and show in this part the ordinary structure, viz. a central
structureless supporting lamina, the Mesoglea,! bearing a
layer of endoderm on each face. On one face are borne the
longitudinal, or retractor muscles, bundles of stout muscular
fibres developed from the endoderm, supported by and appear-
ing as if intimately connected with, supporting offsets of the
mesogloea. On the opposite side to the longitudinal muscles
are the transverse muscle-fibres, much more feebly developed
than the former, and having a general arrangement at right
angles to them ; they are not easy to see in Fungia.
In the lower portions of the interseptal loculi the continuity
of the mesenteries is broken by the synapticula, and they
present special modifications of structure which can only be
understood by a careful comparison of figs. 10, 13, and 15.
Fig. 10 represents a mesentery of the third order dissected out
from a decalcified specimen, and viewed from the side. The
upper portion is seen to be complete, and exhibits the charac-
teristic arrangement of muscle-fibres, but it will be noticed
the longitudinal muscles are gathered into more distinct bundles
than is usually the case in Actinaria. Each face is covered
with a layer of endoderm, as may be seen by reference to figs.
13 and 15. The lower portion of the mesentery is necessarily
discontinuous owing to the intervention of the synapticula.
Here the mesogloea is seen to be continued into a number of
strong bands or ligaments to which the separate bundles of
longitudinal muscles are attached, these ligaments passing
down through the intersynapticular spaces to be fastened,
1 [ have coined this term as a substitute for the term ‘‘ mesoderm ” in the
Ceelenterata, and use it as the equivalent of the “‘ Stiitzlamelle ” or ‘“ Gallert-
substanz”’ of German authors, for reasons which are stated at the end of the
paper.
304, GILBERT C. BOURNE.
according to their position, either to the aboral body wall, or
to thickened lines of the mesoglea of the skeletotrophic invest-
ment shortly to be described. In sections these ligaments
may be seen as thickenings of the tissue surrounding each in-
tersynapticular passage, more rarely as complete partitions
dividing such a chamber intwo. The endoderm covering each
face of the mesentery becomes continuous, where the latter is
divided by the synapticulum, with the endoderm of the skeleto-
trophic investment. The theca being perforate in all but its
most central portions, the ligaments of the mesenteries pass
through the perforations and are continued outside the theca,
to be fastened to the aboral body wall (see fig. 15). The theca
or aboral surface of Fungia is completely covered with soft
tissues which do not closely invest the corallum, but are
separated from the latter by a portion of the cclenteron. It
is important to observe that this extra-thecal portion of the
ceelenteron is, partially at least, divided into chambers by mesen-
teries in the manner described above.
The free edges of the primary and secondary mesenteries
below their insertion into the stomodzum, and the free edges
of the remaining mesenteries in their entire length, are fur-
nished with the thickenings known as mesenterial filaments.
In the primaries and secondaries the mesenterial filaments are
very thick ; their epithelial cells are very long, attenuated, and
crowded close together, showing an abundance of deeply-
staining nuclei. Nematocysts are scanty; but I was able to
distinguish a number of cells, which seemed to be of the same
character as the gland-cells described by the Hertwigs in
Actinia and Sagartia (15). In the other mesenteries the fila-
ments are not so thick, and gland-cells are less abundant,
nematocysts more so; in other respects their structure re-
sembles that of the filaments of the primaries and secondaries.
At the lower end of the free border of each mesentery is a
bundle of much-coiled filaments, forming the structure known
as an acontium.’ These structures in Fungia are strictly
1 Professor Moseley has pointed out to me that the name acontium is
used by Gosse and the Hertwigs to describe only those structures at the base
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN OCORAL FUNGIA. 305
comparable with the mesenterial filaments, of which they
appear to be a continuation. The lower free edge of the me-
sentery appears to be prolonged into a long lamellar offset,
which is much plicated, and surrounded along its free edge
with the thickening which forms the main body of the acon-
tium. This thickening has a similar histological structure to
that of a mesenterial filament, differing from it only in the
larger size of the epithelial cells of which it is composed, in the
abundance of nematocysts, and the corresponding poverty of
gland-cells. Fowler describes acontia of similar structure in
Flabellum patagonichum, and states that they are pro-
truded through cinclides in the peristome (9, p.14). Although
I handled some hundreds of living Fungia I never saw the
acontia protruded, either through the cinclides or through the
mouth, but in some species of Mandrina, acontia of exactly
similar structure to those above described were protruded
through large cinclides on the peristome when the animal was
irritated.
According to Gosse (11) and the Hertwigs the acontia in
Sagartia have the form of bunches of long filaments developed
at the lower free edge of each mesentery, each filament being
ribbon shaped, with one of its borders much thickened. Such
acontia are protruded through cinclides in the body wall. The
acontia observed by Fowler and myself are protruded in Fla-
bellum and Meandrina through cinclides in the peristome, and
appear to be more simple in structure, consisting of a much
plicated off-set or prolongation of the lower free border of the
mesentery, the edge of which is thickened in continuation with
the thickening which forms the mesenterial filament above,
of the mesentery which are in the form of a bunch of filaments. I have fol-
lowed Fowler in extending the name to that mass of contorted filaments,
which is generally known as the contorted mesenterial filaments. This I have
done because (1) they differ in histological detail from the filament on the
upper part of the mesentery in exactly the same manner that Gosse’s acontia
differ. (2) They may be protruded through cinclides. (8) They are clearly
a less differentiated condition of Gosse’s acontia, but not morphologically
distinct from them. To those who adhere to Gosse’s original definition, the
name as I use it in the text, would be incorrect.
306 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
but differing from this in histological detail. The more com-
plicated and effective acontia of Sagartia are probably de-
veloped from a simpler form, such as this.
In Fungia the mesoglea appears to break up dendritically
in the swelling of the acontium, instead of ending in a T-shaped
swelling, as in other forms (vide fig. 12).
The acontia of the tertiary and succeeding mesenteries lie
coiled up in the exocceles at the bases of those mesenteries, and
in section appear to fill up the greater part of those spaces
(vide figs. 13 and 15).
Since the septa are large compared with the interseptal
loculi, and since the septa are always in the entocceles, it fol-
lows that the two mesenteries forming a pair are pushed apart
from one another, whilst the adjacent mesenteries of contiguous
pairs lie close together. So much is this the case, that when
a decalcified animal is cut across transversely the adjacent me-
senteries of contiguous pairs appear from their position to form
pairs, and in old specimens they may become fused together at
a little distance from the periphery, as is shown in fig. 11.
The Celenteron.—The celenteron is represented by the
axial space lying below the stomodeum, the peripheral cham-
bers known as exocceles and endocceles, and the extra-thecal
space lying on the aboral surface between the theca and the
external body wall.
The axial portion of the celenteron is not definitely cireum-
scribed. Above, it opens freely into the stomodzal invagina-
tion; below, it is limited by the investments of the trabecular
columella; at the sides it is partially limited by the thickened
borders of the mesenteries above described. So far as it can
be considered as a definite cavity it is no doubt the cavity in
which digestion is chiefly effected, the process being carried
out by the secretions of the gland-cells of the mesenterial
filaments.
The relations of the peripheral parts of the ccelenteron are
difficult to understand in this, as in all other Madreporarian
corals, but are further complicated in Fungia by the presence
of synapticula. The ccelenteron is composed of all those
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 307
chambers which are lined with endoderm, and if a cast be
made of all those chambers it will represent the space occupied
by the celenteron. Such a cast I have attempted to represent
in fig. 16. The peripheral chambers of the ccelenteron are
divided by the mesenteries into exoceles and entocceles ; in
those corals in which, as in Fungia, all the septa are entoccelic,
the entoceles are almost obliterated by the septa which rise
up within them, but morphologically lie wholly outside them,
since every part of the corallum is invested with its proper
layers [viz. a layer of cells lying next to the calcareous sub-
stance from which the latter is secreted (the calycoblasts of
von Heider), a very thin layer of mesogloea, and a layer of
endoderm], and is thus separated from the ccelenteron by
the three layers of tissue which limit every part of the body.
Thus, in a cast of the celenteron, the latter is seen to he
broken up into wedges by the spaces which are occupied by
the septa (vide fig. 16), and in Fungia these wedges are
further perforated by the apertures through which pass the
synapticula connecting adjacent septa.
Further than this, outside the theca (which is basal and also
perforate in Fungia), there lies a portion of the cclenteron,
communicating with the intra-thecal chambers by canals which
pass through the perforations in the theca, and, like the intra-
thecal chambers, divided by the continuations of the mesen-
teries into exocceles and entocceles (vide figs. 15 and 16, cw/.).
These complicated relations cannot, I conceive, admit of rational
explanation unless the theory of von Koch be admitted, namely,
that the corallum is derived primitively from the basal ecto-
derm, and that the theca is formed by the fused peripheral
parts of the septa, which in fusing divide the mesenteries, and
leave a portion of the coelenteron external to the theca. From
his account of the development of Astroides calycularis
(21) it appears that the skeleton first makes its appearance as
a ring of calcareous nodules situated between the ecto-
derm of the basal disc and the surface of attach-
ment. As development proceeds radial folds of the ectoderm
and mesoglea (mesoderm) are formed, beneath which are
308 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
lines of calcareous crystals; these are the first rudiments of
the septa. Ata later stage the septa form proportionally high
plates, over which the ectoderm is bent in the form of a fold,
the septa begin to branch at their peripheral ends, and
eventually these branches meet and fuse with one another to
form the theca, which cuts the mesenteries in two portions
and isolates the more peripheral part of the ccelenteron from
the more central, the former being limited externally by the
soft body wall, which at first extends down to the base of the
theca. One might almost speak of the corallum as being
pushed in from below, all the three body layers being invagi-
nated to receive it. Eventually the ectoderm which is bent
over the corallum, having the sole function of secreting cal-
careous matter, comes to be represented by that layer of cells
lying between the mesogloea and the corallum, to which von
Heider has given the name of calycoblasts. In old specimens
the external body wall becomes atrophied around the lower
part of the calyx, where it is physiologically replaced by the
theca, but it still holds its place as an investment of the upper
part of the calyx (Randplatte of von Heider) (14). The young
nurse-stock of Fungia, so long as it remains cup shaped, has
all the characters of a Caryophyllia, and may be compared
strictly with the young Astroides. Stutchbury (39) says of
it, ‘So long as the young Fungia retains the form of a Caryo-
phyllia it is entirely enveloped by the soft parts of the animal,
but as the upper disc of the coral spreads out and assumes its
characteristic form, the pedicle is left naked and the soft parts
extend only to the line where the separation afterwards takes
place.” In the “ Alert ” specimen in the British Museum the
soft parts still extend to the base of the nurse-stalk, although
the upper disc has begun to widen out. When the young
Fungia separates from the nurse-stock a clean scar is left at
the point of detachment, through which there is for a short
time free communication to the interior. But the deposition
of calcareous matter round the central ends of the septa soon
blocks up this passage, and immediately afterwards the soft
parts covering the theca (which is now nearly confined to the
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 309
basal surface as in the adult) meet in the centre and fuse
together, so that the primitively external corallum is now
entirely covered over by soft tissues, and one can only predi-
cate its origin from the fact that it is everywhere covered with
three investing tissues, the ectoderm, now represented by the
calycoblastic layer, the mesoglea, and the endoderm, to which
I have above referred under the name of the skeletotrophic
investments. That part of the coelenteron which in Fungia lies
external to the theca on the aboral surface, is the same mor-
‘phologically as the extra-thecal part of the ccelenteron described
as existing around the upper part of the calyx in other corals
by von Koch, von Heider, and Fowler. For further information
on this interesting subject I must refer the reader to the
published works of these three authors.
The Stomodeum.—This is extremely short in Fungia. I
was unable to trace the existence of gonidial grooves (siphono-
glyphes) at its ends, though they no doubt exist. When alive
the animal constantly closes the middle portion of its mouth,
leaving small apertures at the extreme ends through which
currents of water pass in and out. I did not determine
whether these currents are constant in direction.
Histology.—This is simple in character and does not differ
in any essential from the Actinian type.
The ectoderm of the peristome is composed of long columnar
epithelial cells, whose inner ends are drawn out into fine pro-
cesses which rest on the mesogloea ; each ectoderm cell has a
distinct oval nucleus which stains deeply in borax carmine.
Numerous smaller interstitial cells lie between the processes
of the inner ends of the epithelial cells. Large nematocysts
are embedded in the ectoderm ; they are especially abundant
on the ectoderm of the tentacles, but excepting for this the
histology of the tentacles is quite similar to that of the rest of
the peristome. I could not distinguish more than one kind of
nematocyst in Fungia. In every case the lower part of the
thread is armed with a spiral line of spines ; when inverted the
terminal end of the thread is coiled obliquely round the basal
portion. The ectoderm of the aboral surface differs slightly
VOL, XXVII, PART 3.—NEW SER. Z
310 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
from that of the peristome in that the epithelial cells compos-
ing it are less columnar and more cubical, and it is scantily
provided with nematocysts.
Between the corallum and the mesoglcea there is invariably
a layer of rounded, granular, soft-looking cells which do not
stain easily; their nucleus is tolerably large and stains but
faintly in borax carmine. From their position these are
clearly equivalent to ectoderm cells; they are the calycoblasts
(vide fig. 17, cy.}.. They are simple rounded cells, as described
by their discoverer, von Heider ; I could find no trace of stria-
tion in them as Sclater did in Stephanotrochus, nor does
their shape agree with his account.
Between the ectoderm and endoderm of the body wall, and
between the two layers of endoderm which form each septum,
lies a sheet of homogeneous tissue called by German authors
“ Stutzlamelle,” by Englishmen “ mesoderm,” or sometimes
“the supporting lamina.” I have called it the Mesoglea
for reasons which are more conveniently given at the end of
this paper. I could find no trace of structure in this layer in
Fungia, though it is possible that the use of proper reagents in
the fresh condition might have disclosed a fibrillar structure. It
stains slightly with hematoxylin, not at all with borax carmine.
The endoderm is composed throughout of a single layer of
cubical cells with a tolerably large nucleus and a nucleolus.
Presumably these cells bear cilia in the living animal. In
many parts of the body, but particularly in the region of the
insertion of the mesenteries, the endoderm is crowded with
masses of rounded nucleated cells of peculiar appearance ; at
first sight they might easily be mistaken for endoderm cells
forming a layer several cells deep. When treated with iodine
they give a blue colouration, so that there can be no doubt
that they are symbiotic alge, which occur so plentifully in the
endoderm of many Actiniz. I was unable to find any trace
of gonads in the specimens which | examined.
The study of the anatomy of Fungia justifies the position
which has always been assigned to it, between the perforate
and imperforate Madreporarians. The theca, it has been
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 311
shown, is perforate in its more peripheral portions, imperforate
in its central portion, and as age increases the imperforate
area increases largely. The canals passing through the per-
forate portion, and putting the intra-thecal in communication
with the extra-thecal coelenteron are, no doubt, homologous
with the system of canals described by Fowler in Rhodo-
psammia parallela. I can offer no explanation of the
origin and significance of the synapticula. Physiologically
they seem to serve as stays or buttresses, giving solidity and
coherence to the corallum.
The most important result of my researches seems to me to
be the strong evidence furnished in favour of von Koch’s
theory of the formation of the skeleton in the Madreporaria,
the evidence in favour of the existence of extra-thecal ccelen-
teron being, as I think, particularly conclusive.
The Mesoglea, Mesoderm, or Stitzlamelle in
Celenterata.
Throughout my paper I have used the name Mesoglea
for the (structureless) supporting membrane which separates
the ectoderm from the endoderm in Fungia, as in all the
Ceelenterata.
The names given to this layer by German authors are
Stiitzlamelle, Zwischensubstanz, Gallertschichte, or Mesoderm.
Among English authors the use of the name mesoderm has
become general in describing it. Whilst the exact significance
of this layer in the Coelenterata and its homology with the
mesoblast of the higher Metazoa are, to say the least of it, far
from being settled, it seems to me that the use of the name
mesoderm is highly productive of confusion and error.
The names ectoderm and endoderm, meaning simply outer
and inner skin, were first given by Allmann to the outer and
inner cell layers of the Ceelenterata (G. J. Allmann, “On the
Anatomy and Physiology of Cordylophora,” ‘ Phil. Trans.,’
exlili, 1853), and had they always retained this their original
signification there could have been no objection to the use of
312 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
the name mesoderm for the median layer of the Celenterate
body. But, as the Hertwigs have pointed out very clearly,
from the time that the primary germinal layers, the epiblast
and hypoblast, of the higher Metazoa were first compared
and homologised with the ectoderm and endoderm of the
Ceelenterata, there has been an increasing tendency to use the
names ectoderm and endoderm as the equivalents of epiblast
and hypoblast ; and this is especially the case among German
authors, with whom the use of the names epiblast, mesoblast,
hypoblast for the germ layers of the embryo, has not found
general acceptance. It followed that the name mesoderm
came to be used in the same sense, or very nearly so, as meso-
blast, instances being numerous among German authors, and
not infrequent even among English authors, where the meso-
derm of the germ or embryo is spoken of. The difficulty
arising from the identical use of these two names was appre-
ciated by the Hertwigs and by F. E. Schulze, who treated
the subject at some length, each in their own way. F. E.
Schulze asks the very pertinent question whether the name
mesoderm can only be used in those cases in which a special
layer of cells arises early, that is, before the development of
tissues and organs, as a special germ layer; or whether one
can speak of a mesoderm when a differentiation of a special
middle layer of tissue from the outer or inner epithelial layer
arises later and without the formation of a special germ layer.
He concludes by drawing a distinction between triple-walled
animals, such as the Celenterata, and those which have three
germinal layers (viz. the higher Metazoa (Triploblastica) but
not the Coelenterata), admitting at the same time that the
Celenterates have not a mesoderm in the sense of a distinct
layer of cells derived from either or both of the two primary
germ layers before the latter show any differentiation into
tissues or organs. He speaks of them as being “ dreischich-
tige”’ but “ zweiblattrige.” The Hertwigs, in dealing with the
difficulty, proposed to limit the use of the words ectoblast and
entoblast (i.e. epiblast and hypoblast) to the germinal layers
of the embryo, and to use the names ectoderm and endoderm
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 313
to denote the outer and inner limiting layers of the adult
body, whilst the name mesoderm should include all those tis-
sues which lie between the two limiting layers above men-
tioned. This nomenclature is very objectionable, and indeed
has not met with very general acceptance. If limited to the
Coelenterata it would be sufficiently expressive and consistent,
but when applied to the higher groups of the Metazoa it be-
comes utterly impossible of application. To begin with, it is
hard to draw any sharp line between the external and internal
limiting membranes in the higher Metazoa; in forms where
the stomodeum and proctodzeum are derived from epiblastic
invaginations, and form no inconsiderable part of the digestive
tract, the confusion becomes complete. In the Isoyoda, for
instance, nearly the whole of the digestive tract is formed from
the stomodezum and proctodzeum ; thus, according to the Hert-
wigs, this clearly epiblastic internal limiting layer would be
called endoderm. In the Vertebrate phylum, also, the adult
nervous system, clearly derived as it is from the epiblast,
would, because it lies between the two limiting layers, come
under the name of mesoderm. Moreover, it is an altogether
unscientific and confusing method to classify tissues by their
position in the adult rather than by their derivation from the
primitive germ layers.
The words ectoderm, mesoderm, endoderm, have become so
universally used as the equivalents of epiblast, mesoblast, hy-
poblast, that there is very little hope of their being now
limited to the group of Coelenterata to which they were origi-
nally applied, and this being the case we ought to consider
how far the median supporting lamella of that phylum, the
Stutzlamelle or Gallertschichte of German authors, is homolo-
gous with the mesoblast of the higher Metazoa before apply-
ing the name mesoderm to it. If it is not homologous, but is
of a different nature, then some other name than mesoderm
should be found for it, otherwise it will be confused with the
true mesoblast.
This opens two questions (1) What do we mean when we
speak of a true mesoblast? (2) What are the characters of the
314 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
median lamella, and what is its origin in the Celenterate
phylum ?
This is not the place to enter into a discussion of the whole
subject of the origin and significance of the germinal layers,
which the first question introduces, but it may shortly be
stated, without going very far wrong, that by mesoblast is
meant a layer of undifferentiated cells, developed in the embryo
before the differentiation of other organs or tissues, from either
one or the other or both of the primary germ layers, the epi-
blast and hypoblast. By mesoderm, or its adjective meso-
dermic, are meant all such tissues in the adult as are clearly
derived from the mesoblast. This is not the sense in which
I should like to use the term, but a sense which has become
inevitable from the usage of other authors.
To this idea of mesoblast receut theories on the origin of
metameric segmentation have added another highly important
signification, and one which is of especial importance to the
present question. In the majority of the higher Metazoa
(Triploblastica) the mesoblast is understood, in part, to denote
the limiting layer of the celom. The Platyhelminthes offer a
difficulty to this conception in that they are not known to
possess a true ceelom, and it is a question whether they ances-
traily possessed one, or whether they are the surviving repre-
sentatives of the triploblastic Metazoon in which the celom
was not developed. From the analogy of the Discophora, and
from other considerations, I am inclined to think it probable
that future researches will prove that all the Triploblastica are
ancestrally Coelomata, the presence of mesoblast implying the
(ancestral) presence of a celom.! However this may be, in
1 Tn the embryo of Leptoplana, the cells which will form the mesoblast are
marked out very early, before the hypoblast and epiblast are definitely estab-
lished. But it is noticeable that the mesoblast cells are split off from the
four large cells which afterwards form the hypoblast, the epiblast having been
already marked out by four smaller cells, which eventually increase in number
and surround the mesoblast and hypoblast. I think that in this case the
mesoblast may fairly be said to have a hypoblastic origin. I can see no
objection to the view that this may be a very much abbreviated development,
derived from a type in which the mesoblast arose as (hypoblastic) outgrowths
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 315
all those forms in which a ccelom is recognised the division
of the mesoblast into splanchnopleure and somatopleure, and
its relation to the ccelom in limiting it, must enter largely into
our conception of what is meant by the term mesoblast.
The origin of the mesoblast is very various ; for information
on this point I must refer the reader to Balfour’s ‘Comparative
Embryology,’ vol. ii, p. 290, where a tabular account of its
various modes of origin is given. From this table it will be
seen that while instances of a mixed derivation of the meso-
blast are not common, a purely epiblastic derivation is still
more uncommon, occurring in fact only in the larva of Desor,
Bonellia, and perhaps in Lumbricus trapezoides. A
purely hypoblastic derivation is of frequent occurrence. It
is generally admitted that part of the mesoblast, at any rate,
was primitively derived from the epiblast ; that in many forms
all traces of this derivation are lost has been explained by
Lankester (26 and 27) by his theory of precocious segregation.
On the other hand there is much evidence in favour of the view
that the coelom is derived from archenteric diverticula, and
that the limiting walls of the ceelom are in consequence de-
rived from hypoblast. This is clearly the case in several
groups; in others there is reason to believe that the origin of
the mesoblast as ingrowths from the lips of the blastopore is
an abbreviation of development, and that in the ancestors of
the groups in which this occurs the mesoblast took its rise
from the walls of outgrowths of the archenteron.
It is assumed that the triploblastic Metazoa took their origin
from the diploblastic Metazoa, as the Ccelenterates have been
called (I leave the Dicyemidz and Orthonectide out of the
question). The Celenterate, represented by an Actinia, already
in the elongation of its mouth and the arrangement of its
mesenteries, shows a tendency to bilateral symmetry. It is
supposed that this tendency is further increased, that the radial
symmetry of the peripheral chambers is replaced by a bilateral
symmetry, metamerically repeated along the long axis formed
of the archenteron. If this were admitted it would admit the Turbellaria
among the Coelomata.
316 GILBERT ©. BOURNE.
by the mouth; and, finally, it is supposed that these chambers
are the equivalents of the paired archenteric diverticula seen
in the embryo of Amphioxus, outgrowths which are eventually
nipped off to form the mesoblastic somites, the walls of which
constitute the mesoblast, the cavities the celom. If the facts
adduced in support of this theory are not numerous enough to
warrant our giving unqualified consent to it, there is at least a
great deal to be said in its favour. What is important to the
present purpose is, that if it be accepted as a probability, and
if further it be admitted as a general statement that, throughout
the Triploblastica this is the origin of the ccelom, then by far
the greater part of what we understand by mesoblast in
the Triploblastica is homologous, not with the supporting
lamina, the Stiitzlamelle, of the Coelenterata, but with the
endoderm lining the cavities of the entoceles and exocceles.
If we seek for an explanation of the supporting lamina in its
origin we do not get a very satisfactory answer. Kowalevsky
(25) describes the development of a jelly-like interstitial tissue
between the cells of the inner layer of the thickened ectoderm
of the larve of certain Alcyonarians. The inner cells eventu-
ally lose their primitive shape, become star shaped or spindle
shaped, and are separated from one another by an interstitial,
jelly-like substance. The outer ectoderm cells form a plaster
epithelium, which bounds the external surface of the animal.
In this case there is no doubt that the interstitial tissue, usually
called the mesoderm of the adult, is derived from the epiblast.
We have not so exact an account of the development of the
supporting lamina in any other group of the Ccelenterata.
Fol (10) describes the appearance of a clear transparent jelly
between the two primary layers in Geryonia, but is unable to
state which layer it is derived from. Claus (2) is no more
explicit on the same subject in his work on Charybdea
marsupialis. Metschnikoff (‘Studien ber die Entwicklung
der Medusen und Siphonophoren’) speaks of a similar jelly-
like substance making its appearance, but he does not say
how. Chun gives no further account of the origin of the jelly-
like substance in Ctenophora ; but, according to a recent paper
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 317
oy Metschnikoff (29), mesoblast cells are marked off in the
embryo of Callianira bialata before any tissues are de-
veloped, but after the complete separation of ectoderm from
endoderm. He says, further, that the case is the same in
Beroe and Cydippe. From the account given the segmentation
appears to be very peculiar. If the formation of mesoderm is
correctly described it would mark off the Ctenophora very
sharply from the remainder of the Coelenterata. Metschnikoff,
however, for reasons which are not quite clear to me, refuses
to this layer the name of mesoderm.
No account is given of the origin of the supporting lamina
in the Hydrozoa, nor in the Actinaria.
The only certain knowledge, then, that we have about the
origin of the jelly-like layer is that in the Aleyonarians Sym-
podium coralloides and Clavularia crassa the inter-
stitial substance is derived from the epiblast, and the cells in
it are epiblast cells. Thus the origin of the jelly-like support-
ing lamina of Ccelenterata gives no direct evidence of its
homology with the mesoblast of the Triploblastica, but rather
the contrary, for the latter is, as we have seen, rather connected
with the hypoblast than with the epiblast.
The characters of the supporting lamina in the Ceelenterata
are as follows :
In the Hydromeduse it is a fine, apparently structureless
membrane, interposed between ectoderm and endoderm. When
treated with suitable reagents it exhibits a fibrillar arrange-
ment; it contains no cells.
In the Siphonophora it is a structureless jelly-like substance.
In the Scyphomeduse (Charybdea) the jelly-like substance
is abundant, forming the bulk of the umbrella; it contains no
cells, but has a fibrillar arrangement.
In the Discomedusz (Aurelia) the gelatinous matrix contains
a number of oval or star-shaped cells, anastomosing with one
another, and mainly derived from the hypoblast.
In the Ctenophora it contains muscular stellate cells, mostly
of epiblastic origin, though some are stated by Chun to come
from the hypoblast.
318 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
According to Metschnikoff, in certain forms these cells are
marked out early in the embryo.
In Alcyonaria cells in which the calcareous spicules forming
the skeleton are developed lie embedded in a gelatinous
matrix.
In Actinaria and Madreporaria the supporting lamina is
fibrillar, and contains a few connective-tissue cells. Some-
times muscular fibres are embedded in it (Hertwigs, 15).
It is obvious that in none of these cases (except the doubtful
case of the Ctenophora, as described by Metschuikoff) is there
anything like a true mesoblast, in the sense of a cellular layer
marked out early in the embryo. But there is a third layer
of tissue in the body, interposed between the ectoderm and
endoderm, which in some cases does and in others does not
contain cells, but the bulk of which in all cases is a gelatinous
matrix. This third layer assumes immense development in
some forms, e. g. the Discomedusz and Alcyonaria, so that it
is wholly misleading to call Ceelenterates two-layered animals.
They are certainly three-layered—anyone can see that by
cutting a section across any one of them—but the question is,
Can they possibly be called triploblastic ? Can they be said to
possess a third germinal layer—a mesoblast? -
It is sometimes argued that the mesoblast is, after all,
nothing more than a layer of cells developed from one or both
of the two primary layers; that the middle layer of the
Coelenterata contains cells in many instances; that these cells
differ from the mesoblast cells of other forms only in the date
of their taking up their position in the third layer, the former
being separated off from -the primary layers in the embryo, the
latter in the adult ; that this difference in time is not essential ;
and that therefore the cell-containing middle layer in the
Alcyonaria, for example, has as much right to be called a
mesoblast as that of any other animal.
I cannot but think that this style of argument leads to a
want of precision of ideas, and to a vagueness in the definition
of the thing signified. In a great number of forms the middle
layer contains no cellular element; it is a nearly structureless
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 319
gelatinous matter, poured in, as it were, between the ecto-
derm and endoderm to serve as a support for those tissues and
to give coherence and consistency to the body of the animal.
Where no cells are present (Hydromeduse, Charybdcea), a
third cell layer, a mesoblast, obviously cannot be spoken of.
In other forms we find cells derived from one or other of the
primary layers wandering into the gelatinous substance after
the formation of the latter, and retaining a constant position
there (Discomeduse, Actinaria). ‘These cells ought to be con-
sidered epiblastic or hypoblastic according to their origin, just
as much as the central nervous system of the Vertebrata,
entirely surrounded by mesoblastic structures, is considered as
part of the epiblast.
In the Alcyonaria the separation of the epiblast cells which
are destined to become the skeletogenous cells takes place
contemporaneously with the secretion of the gelatinous matrix
in which they are embedded. None the more is the layer thus
formed entitled to be called a germinal layer, or even a
separate cell layer, though a step has been made towards the
latter. The cells forming the skeleton are clearly epiblastic in
origin, are derived from the epiblast after its demarcation, and
are properly considered as its derivatives. The Alcyonarian
skeleton is really of epiblastic origin.
In a further stage the cells which, in Ctenophora, are
destined to become stellate muscular cells embedded in the
gelatinous matrix of the supporting lamina, are, according to
Metschnikoff, marked out early in the embryo, at a period
when the endoderm is scarcely covered in by the ectoderm.
This is nearly the same thing as the formation of embryonic
mesoblast, and foreshadows it, but the ultimate history of the
cells ought to preclude our calling them mesoblastic.
I do not wish to assert that the supporting lamina of Ce-
lenterata is not represented in the mesoblast of Coelomata; it
is highly probable that it is. The Aleyonaria and Ctenophora
are good examples of the tendency which muscular and con-
nective-tissue cells, primitively belonging to the external and
internal limiting layers, have to separate themselves from their
320 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
original position and to become more deeply situated. When
such cells form a layer situated between epiblast and hypo-
blast they constitute a third layer, a mesoblast. But in point
of fact we have no positive evidence that such a simple third
layer exists without the ancestral coexistence of a celom. I
have already given reasons for believing that such a simple me-
soblast does not obtain in the Platyhelminthes. The nearest
approach to it is in the Ctenophora, and in them the stellate
cells are homologous, not with the whole of the mesoblast of
the Celomata, but only with a part of it, viz. that part which
may be supposed to have originated independently of the
celom, but of the origin of which the traces are, in the
majority of cases, suppressed.
The part is not the whole, nor should the name denoting the
whole be given to the part, for which reason I object to
giving the name mesoblast, or its equivalent mesoderm, to the
supporting lamina of Ccelenterata. I have proposed for it the
name Mesogloa, a name which was suggested to me by
Professor Lankester in the course of a conversation on this
subject, and which corresponds exactly to the Gallertlage of
German authors. Its meaning, “ middle jelly,” has particular
reference to the Medusze, of whose bodies it forms the greater
part.
Before concluding this paper I have to express my obliga-
tions to Professor Moseley, who kindly permitted me to use
the Oxford laboratory during my studies, and assisted me with
much valuable advice. Also to my friends Mr. Hatchett
Jackson, and Mr. W. Baldwin Spencer of Oxford, who helped
me in many ways.
ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 321
List oF Works REFERRED TO.
1. F. M. Batrour.—‘ Comparative Embryology,’ 1880, 2 vols.
2. C. Craus.—* Untersuchungen tiber Charybdca marsupialis,” ‘ Ar-
beit. aus. Zool. Instit. Wien,’ Bd. i, p. 221.
. J. D. Dana.—‘ Report on Zoophytes of the Wilkes’ Exploring Expedi-
tion,’ 1846.
4, J. D. Dana.—‘ Corals and Coral Islands,’ 1872.
18.
20.
21
.
. P. Martin Duncay.— Observations on the Madreporarian Family the
Fungide,” ‘Journ. Linn, Soc.,’ xvii, p. 187.
. H. ve Lacaze Dututers.—“ Développement des Coralliaires,” ‘ Arch. de
Zool. Exper. et gén.,’ tom. i, 1872.
. H. pe Lacaze Duruters.—“ Développement des Coralliaires,” ‘ Arch.
de Zool. Exper. et gén.,’ tom. ii, 1873.
. Escuscnoi1z.— Isis,’ 1825, p. 476, pl. 5, fig. 19.
. G. H. FowLrrer.—“ The Anatomy of the Madreporaria,” I, ‘ Quart. Journ.
Micr. Sci.,’ 1885, p. 577.
. H. Fou.—“ Die erste Entwicklung der Geryonideneies,” ‘ Jenaische
Zeitschrift,’ vii, p. 471.
. P. H. Gossr.—‘ Actinologia Britannica,’ 1860.
. Haacnze.—* Blastologie der Korallen,” ‘Jenaische Zeitschrift,’ 1879.
. A. von Hemper.—“ Sagartia troglodytes,” ‘Sitz. der Kais. Akad.
zum Wien,’ lxxv, Abth. i, p. 367.
. A. von Hurprr.— Die Gattung Cladocora,” ‘Sitz. der Kais. Akad.
Wiss.,’ 1881.
. O. anp R. Herrwie.— Die Actinien,’ Jena, 1879.
. HoLttarp.—‘ These de la faculté des Sciences de Paris,’ Sorbonne, 1848.
. G. von Kocu.— Bemerkungen iiber das Skelet der Korallen,” ‘ Morph.
Jahrb.,’ v, p. 316; Extract in ‘ Proc. Zool. Soc.,’ 1880, p. 24.
G. von Kocu.—* Notizen iiber Korallen,’ ‘Morph. Jahrb.,’ vi, p. 355.
G. von Kocu.— Mittheilungen iiber Coelenteraten,” ‘Jenaische Zeit-
schrift,’ xi.
G. von Kocu.—“ Mittheilungen tiber das Kalkskelet der Madreporarien,”
‘Morph. Jahrb.,’ viii, p. 85; Abstract in ‘Journ. Roy. Micr. Soc.’
(2), ii, p. 795.
G. von Kocu.—“ Ueber die Entwicklung der Kalkskelettes von As-
troides calycularis,” ‘Mitth. aus der Stat. Zool. Neapel,’ iii,
1882, p. 284.
322 GILBERT C. BOURNE.
22.
23.
24
G. von Kocu.—‘ Biol. Centralblatt,’ ii, 1882.
G. von Kocu.—‘ Ueber das Verhaltniss von Skelet und Weichtheile be
den Madreporen,” ‘ Morph. Jahrb.,’ xii, p. 154, 1886.
. A. KonitKer.—‘ Jeones Histologie,’ 2te Abth., Heft i, p. 116.
25. A. Kowatevsky.—* Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Alcyoniden,” ‘ Zool.
Anzeig.,’ 2te Jahrg., No. 38.
96. E. Ray LANKEsTER.—‘ Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.,’ xi, p. 321, 1873.
27. HE. Ray Lanxester.—‘ Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ New Series, xvii,
28
29
30
3l
32.
33
34
35
36
37
p. 399.
. Ex. MetscunrKorr.— Spongeologische Studien,” ‘ Zeit. fiir wiss. Zool.,
xxxil, 1879.
. Ev. Metscunixorr.— Vergleichend Embryologische Studien,” ‘Zeit.
fur wiss. Zool.,’ xlii, 1885.
. Mitnr-Epwarps anp Haimre.—‘ Histoire des Coralliaires,’ Paris, 1860.
. H. N. Mosrtry.—‘‘ On Seriatopora and Pocillopora,” ‘Quart. Journ.
Micr. Sci.,” New Series, 1882, p. 391.
H. N. Mosetry.— “ Challenger ” Reports,’ “ Zoology,” vol. ii, “ Report
on the Deep Sea Madreporaria.”
. Quoy anp Garmard.—‘ Voyage de l’Astrolabe,’ vol. ii, pl. xiv.
. F. E. Scuvutze.— Entwickelung der Sycandra raphanus,” ‘Zeit.
fiir wiss. Zool.,’ xxv, 1875, Suppl.
. FE. E. Scnvrze.— Untersuchungen tiber den Bau und die Entwicklung
der Spongien,” ‘ Zeit. fiir wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xxxi, p. 262.
. SCHNEIDER AND RottrEKEN.—‘ Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.,’ vii, 1871.
. W. L. Sctater.— On a Madreporarian Coral of the genus Stephano-
trochus,” ‘ Proc. Zool. Soc.,’ 1866.
38. C. Semper.— Generationswechsel bei Steinkorallen,” ‘Zeit. fiir wiss
39
Zool.,’ xxii, p. 235.
. SturcHBuRY.— Trans. Linn. Soe.,’ vol. xvi, 1830, p. 494.
40. ALLEN THomson.— Report Brit. Assoc., 1877, ‘ President’s Address.’”
4]
1G. H. Fow.er.— Anatomy of the Madreporatia,” ii, ‘Quart. Journ.
Micr. Sci.,’ xxvii.
1 Received since this paper was sent up to the press.
ANATOMY OF TRE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 3239
DESCRIPTION OF PLATES XXIII, XXIV, & XXV.
Illustrating Mr. Gilbert C. Bourne’s Paper on ‘‘ The Anatomy
of the Madreporarian Coral Fungia.”
Fie. 1. Ad naturam.—General view of Fungia dentata, showing the ar-
rangement of the tentacles and their relation to the septa.
Fie. 2.—Diagram in illustration to Fig. 1. m. Mouth. ¢. Tentacles.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Septa (or tentacles) of the first, second, third order, &c.
Primary septa coloured red, secondary blue, tertiary green, quaternary yellow,
quinary, &c., black.
Fics. 3—8.—Diagrammatic, from Stutchbury, Semper, and Moseley.
Fig. 3 is a young nurse-stock of Fungia immediately after fixation.
p. Peristome. ¢h. Theca. 4. Base.
Fig. 4. The same, in which the’peristome has commenced to widen out
and assume its characteristic form.
Fig. 5. Nurse-stock of Fungia; an absorption of calcareous matter has
taken place along the line £ where the young Fungia will separate from
the nurse-stock.
Fig. 6. Young Fungia shortly after separation from the nurse-stock.
The peristome has grown greatly in excess of the theca.
Fig. 7. The same more advanced, showing the increasing size of the
peristome.
Fig. 8. The adult Fungia.
Fic. 9.—Diagram showing a pair of mesenteries and their relation to the
investing tissues of the corallum. The mesentery to the left is seen to be
divided by a synapticulum into a central and a peripheral portion. ec. Kcto-
derm. m. Mesogloea of the body wall. ed. Endoderm of the body wall.
m'. Mesoglea of the mesenteries. m’. Mesoglaea of the skeletotrophic
tissues. ed’. Endoderm of the mesenteries. ed’. Endoderm of the skeleto-
trophic tissues. ms. Muscles. cy. Calycoblasts. ed. Nematocysts. m./.
Mesenterial filaments. sb. a. Symbiotic alge. syz. Perforation through
which a synapticulum passes.
Fic. 10. Ad naturam.—A mesentery of Fungia dentata. ac. Acontia.
y. m. s. Longitudinal muscle-fibres, the remainder of the lettering as before.
The shaded part represents that part of the mesentery which is formed of
mesoderm and its overlying muscular fibres. The dotted lines show the
tubes (parts of the ccelenteron) bounded by endoderm of the skeletotrophic
investment which run down between the synapticula, to the mesogloea of
which thickened prolongations of the mesoglcea of the mesenteries are attached,
as shown in 2.
324 GILBERT ©. BOURNE.
Fic. 1]. Ad naturam.—Two contiguous mesenteries not belonging to the
same pair, from an adult Fungia, showing their tendency to fuse together in
old specimens. Lettering as before.
Fie. 12. Ad naturam.—Section through an acontium, showing the dendritic
branching of the mesoderm in the acontium, the large nematocysts ed., and
the gland-cells gd.
Fic. 13.—Diagrammatic horizontal section through the corallum and soft
parts of Fungia dentata. The corallum is shaded, the mesoglcea is repre-
sented by a black line. The calycoblasts are omitted for simplicity’s sake.
The septa are seen to lie in the entoceles, the cclenteron being broken up
by the synapticula into a number of parallel tubes, in each of which are seen
the mesoglea thickenings 2, which give attachment to the vertical muscle-
fibres. The acontia of the lower orders of mesenteries are seen coiled up in
the celenteron. m¢. Mesenteries. syz. Synapticula.
Fic. 14. Ad naturam.—Section through the body wall of F. dentata.
ed. Endoderm. m. Mesogloea. ec. Ectoderm. z. Interstitial cells.
Fic. 15.—Diagrammatic vertical section through the peripheral part of F.
dentata. ec. p. Ectoderm of the peristome. ec. 6. Ectoderm of the base.
The shading and lettering as in Fig. 13. ¢h. Theca. ev. Exoceele. ent. Ento-
ccele external to theca.
Fic. 16.—Diagram illustrating the relations of the celenteron to the
corallum. The drawing may be considered as a cast of all the cavities lined
by endoderm. At sp. are shown the spaces occupied by the septa, by which
the body is broken up into a number of wedge-shaped masses. The rows of
parallel elongate perforations show the position of the synapticula. At c@l. is
seen that part of the body cavity which lies outside the perforate theca.
th. Perforations for theca. syz. Perforations for synapticula.
Fic. 17.—A portion of the skeletotrophic investment highly magnified.
ed. Endoderm. m. Mesoglea. cy. Calycoblasts
bo
Or
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 8
On Some Points in the Development of
Petromyzon fluviatilis.!
By
Arthur E. Shipley, B.A.,
Christ’s College, Cambridge, Demonstrator of Comparative Anatomy in the
University.
With Plates XXVI, XXVII, XXVIII, and XXIX.
Tue development of the Lamprey has occupied the attention
of many embryologists during the last fifty years. Of these we
owe the most complete accounts of the changes through which
the egg passes to Max Schultze, Owsjannikow, Calberla,
Scott, Balfour, and Dohrn. I have recently worked through
the development of Petromyzon again, and worked out the
origin of several organs which have hitherto been incompletely
known. In many of the most important points my researches
confirm those of the earlier observers, and to these I have only
referred at such length as would make the account intelli-
gible; in others, such as the persistence of the blastopore, the
origin of the ventral mesoblast, &c., I differ from previous
descriptions; and some points, such as the development of the
heart, of the parts of the brain and cranial nerves, are worked
out for the first time.
The material for this article was obtained by artificially
1 The differences between Petromyzon planeri and fluviatilis are so
slight, and the intermediate forms so common, that I am disposed to follow
Anton Schneider, and to consider them as varieties of the same species. This
species may conveniently retain the name fluviatilis, as opposed to the
larger form Petromyzon marinus.
VOL, XXVII, PART 3 ——NEW SER. AA
326 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
fertilising the eggs of the ripe female Lampern, hatching the
larve out, and rearing them in confinement. The breeding
time is during the latter half of April and the beginning of
May.
The generative products of both male and female were
squeezed into glass vessels containing fresh water, and the
contents slightly stirred. The eggs at once adhered to the
bottom and sides of the vessel, and were left undisturbed for
three or four hours. The water was then poured off and a
fresh supply added. This was kept thoroughly aerated by
means of Semper’s aerating apparatus. The number of eggs
fertilised were about 70 per cent. of the total, though some
hatches were much more successful than others, The rate of
segmentation and development also varied greatly, being
influenced by the temperature and manner of aeration. The
unfertilised eggs very soon could be distinguished from the
fertilized ; they developed great cavities or craters and were
soon attacked by fungi. The fungus, however, rarely affected
the developing eggs.
The spermatozoa have elongated heads, pointed at their free
end, but thicker at the end from which the tail arises (fig. 1).
Their length is from 35 to 40 micro. mm., of which the head
forms 8 micro.mm. They move actively about in the water,
until they come into contact with an ovum. They enter the
egg through a micropyle, and Calberla states that the head
only enters the protoplasm of the ovum, the tail remaining
fixed in the micropyle, thus hindering the entrance of other
spermatozoa.
The eggs are almost spherical, with a diameter of about a
millimetre. On contact with water the outer cell-membrane
swells up and forms a gelatinous coating, by means of which
the eggs adhere to the bottom and sides of the vessel. This
gelatinous envelope is of considerable thickness ; it ultimately
disappears shortly before the embryo is hatched. Sections
through unfertilised eggs show the protoplasm crowded with
oval yolk granules, which stain deeply. These yolk granules
vary in size, and this is very evident in the segmenting eggs,
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. S27
where the yolk granules in the more quickly dividing upper
pole are much smaller than those in the more inert lower pole.
An attempt has been made to show that those parts of the
unsegmented egg containing the smaller granules is destined
to form the epiblastic parts of the embryo (16).! This view
seems to me to need confirmation. The small size of the yolk
granules in the epiblast might be due to the more rapid
division of these cells, causing a more rapid consumption of the
food-yolk.
The unusually deep staining which the yolk granules assume
very materially increases the difficulty of observation. EHspe-
cially in the earlier stages of development the cell limits and
nuclei were rendered obscure by the masses of deeply stained
yolk granules.
As previous observers have stated, there are two polar bodies
extruded one after the other. After fertilization the egg con-
tracts, leaving a cavity between it and the egg membrane.
The first furrow appears about the fourth hour; it appears
first in the upper pole and spreads round the egg on each side.
Calberla states that the micropyle becomes at first oval, then
slit like, and finally passes over into the primary furrow. I
have not been able to observe this process in my eggs. He
further states that the first furrow divides the egg into two
unequal parts, a large epiblastic and a small hypoblastic ; the
smaller of these divides subsequently more rapidly than the
latter. Thus, according to him, the first furrow would cor-
respond with the first equatorial one in the Frog’s ovum.
Scott, although he had no fresh material to work with, was
able to correct this, and, as the latter suggests, Calberla was
probably misled by cases of abnormal segmentation. Many
of the eggs which apparently had not been fertilized divided
by one, two, and sometimes three furrows, and when this
took place the furrows were nearly always abnormal in
position.
The second furrow is vertical and at right angles to the
first, and also appears first in the upper pole. The third is
1 The figures in brackets refer to the list of papers at the end.
328 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
equatorial, but nearer the upper than the lower pole. After
its appearance the epiblastic half is separated from the hypo-
blastic or yolk-bearing half (fig. 2).
The external phenomena of segmentation have been accu-
rately described by Max Schultze, with the exception of
the next stage. After the first equatorial furrow he describes
two more in the same plane, but in my eggs the equatorial
furrow was followed by two vertical lines, which appear at
first in the upper pole exactly as they do in the Frog’s ovum
(fig. 3). These are followed by two more equatorial furrows
which divide the egg into thirty-two segments. After this the
segments of the epiblastic pole divide more rapidly than those
of the lower.
Fig. 5 represents a transverse section through an egg thirty-
six hours after fertilisation. In this stage it is a_blasto-
sphere, with a segmentation cavity enclosed by a single layer
of cells except along the line where the epiblastic and hypo-
blastic cells join. Here the layer is two cells thick. The
nuclei of the large cells appear small, but it must be recollected
that the amount of protoplasm is very small compared to the
yolk. The latter has been omitted for the sake of clearness.
Fig. 6 is taken from an egg twelve hours later. Here both
the roof and floor of the segmentation cavity are many cells
thick. A similar stage is found in the Frog’s ovum, but there
is this difference between the two. In the Frog’s egg the
whole of the roof of the segmentation cavity forms epiblast ;
in the Lamprey it is only the outermost layer. The following
stages are accompanied by a thinning out of the roof of the
segmentation cavity, and are represented in figs. 7 and 8.
On this point my observations tend to confirm those of
Calberla, and are opposed to those of Schultze, who found
a many-layered roof to the segmentation cavity just before
invagination. The thinning out appears to be brought about
by the inner cells of the roof passing round to the sides and
floor of the segmentation cavity. Just before the invagination
which forms the gastrula the roof of the segmentation cavity
consists of a single layer of cells; the segmentation cavity is
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 329
large and occupies the whole of the upper hemisphere, whilst
the lower hemisphere is solid and consists of larger cells, which
we may speak of as yolk-cells. The most external layer of
these consists of rather columnar cells. These latter cells
socn become smaller than the inner yolk-cells, and about the
time of invagination the whole egg is enclosed by a layer of
small columnar cells, the epiblast. This is brought about by
the conversion of the outermost row of yolk-cells into small
columnar cells. As Balfour has shown, this takes place
latest in the region of the blastopore.
The invagination which forms the mesenteron commences
about 180 hours after fertilisation ; it commences at one side
of the equator of the egg, in the region where the single layer
of epiblast cells passes into the yolk-cells (fig. 9). The invagi-
nation at first has a wide-arched slit-like opening, but this
soon narrows into a small circular pore (fig. 4). The segmen-
tation cavity is gradually obliterated by the invaginated cells.
These from the first enclose a cavity, the mesenteron. In this
respect the formation of the gastrula is like that of Amphioxus,
and differs from that of the Amphibia, where the mesenteron
appears later as a splitting underneath the invaginated cells.
The presence of a large amount of food-yolk causes the invagi-
nated cells to be pushed dorsalwards. The mesenteron
extends as a tubular cavity about two thirds round the
embryo. Its dorsal wall is composed of columnar cells resem-
bling those of the general epiblast ; the cells forming the floor
have the same characters as the yolk-cells (fig. 12). The
dorsal side of the mesenteron lies in immediate contact with
the under surface of the epiblast throughcut its entire length.
In this respect again the Lamprey differs from the Frog, where
the invaginated hypoblast cuts off a mass of cells on its dorsal
side, which subsequently forms the mesoblast.
The mesoblast now appears by the differentiation of two
bands of these yolk-cells, which lie in the angles formed by
the mesenteron and the epiblast (fig. 12). This differentiation
commences in front and is continued backward. The two
bands of mesoblast are separated dorsally by the juxtaposition
300 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
of the dorsal wall of the mesenteron and the epiblast, and
ventrally by the hypoblastic yolk-cells which are in contact
with the epiblast over two thirds of the embryo. Subse-
quently, but at a much later date, the mesoblast is completed
ventrally by the downgrowth on each side of these mesoblastic
plates. This takes place at a comparatively early stage in the
head and that part of the trunk lying in front of the liver.
In the posterior part, which remains swollen with yolk, the
ventral completion of the mesoblast is delayed.
The first formation of the mesoblastic plates appears to
take place by a differentiation of the hypoblastic yolk-cells in
situ, and not from invaginated cells (figs. 12 and 13). The
subsequent downward growth is brought about by the cells
proliferating along the free ventral edge of the mesoblast,
these cells then growing ventralwards, pushing their way
between the yolk-cells and epiblast (fig. 11).
This account of the origin of the mesoblast differs from that
given by Scott. He describes the mesoblast as arising from
two sources—(1) cells which are derived from the invagina-
tion of the blastoderm, (2) the outermost layer of the hypo-
blastic yolk-cells, which, according to Scott, split off from
the remainder, and form a ventral sheet which completes the
mesoblast in that side of the body. The mesoblast in the
head is derived only from the first source, as by the time it is
completed ventrally the head is raised above the yolk-con-
taining parts.
Shortly before the development of the head fold raises the
head from the yolk-bearing part of the embryo, the neural
plate becomes evident in the exterior. It extends as alow
ridge from the anterior lip of the blastopore to just in front of
the blind anterior end of the mesenteron, over two thirds of
the circumference of the embryo.
The blastopore is always visible at the posterior end of the
neural plate. Schultze has given a very complete set of figures
of the exterior of the embryo. As his figures show, with the
elongation of the embryo the anterior end curves round and
overlaps the posterior, thus obscuring the blastopore. Fig. 10
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 331
is a section taken through the blastopore and the head soon
after the head is raised above the general level of the egg.
From his observations of the embryo as a whole, Schultze
came to the conclusion that the blastopore persisted and gave
rise to the anus, and he was supported in this view by Calberla.
Later observers, however, who have studied the development
of the Lamprey by means of sections, have maintained
Benecke’s view that the blastopore disappears. Scott
describes the neural canal enclosing the blastopore and figures
the neurenteric canal thus formed. He describes the formation
of the anus, from a protuberance of the alimentary canal
which approaches the epidermis and breaks through about the
twentieth day. Balfour also states that the blastopore closes
and does not form the permanent anus.
My observations of the embryo as an opaque object lead me
to the belief that the blastopore remained open. In this I
have been confirmed by sections taken through a series of
embryos preserved at intervals of a few hours. Primarily the
blastopore hes at the posterior dorsal end of the embryo
(fig. 4), but by the growth of the dorsal surface and the forma-
tion of the tail it comes to occupy a position in the ventral
surface. What was the anterior lip in the first position comes
to be the posterior in the latter.
Fig. 4 is a view of the embryo twelve days old, as an opaque
object, showing the blastopore at the posterior end of the
neural ridge. Fig. 16 is an oblique section through an embryo
about two days older, showing the nervous cord just separated
from the skin, and the notochord both continuing behind the
blastopore.
Scott was of opinion that the lumen of the invaginated
mesenteron persisted only in the fore-gut. Soon after the in-
vagination is completed this part of the alimentary canal lying
in the head and neck becomes raised from the rest of the
embryo. It is thus separated off from the yolk-cells, and the
hypoblastic cells in this region soon assume a definite columnar
appearance, though they continue to contain yolk granules for
some days. This region extends to where the liver appears
302 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
in older embryos. A similar change in the cells lining the
mesenteron takes place at its posterior end. The cells lining
the blastopore and extending for some distance into the ali-
mentary canal assume very early a columnar appearance and
appear perfectly continuous with the columnar epiblast (figs.
10, 14, and 16.) The cells lining the hind-gut retain the
character of the yolk-cells for a long time, but the lumen of
the mesenteron in this region never disappears, as Scott and
Calberla thought. The lumen of the alimentary canal, with
the exception of the mouth, is derived directly from the inva-
gination which forms the gastrula, and no part of it is ever
obliterated in the course of development.
A similar persistence of the blastopore to form the anus appears
to be common in the Amphibia. It has been shown to occur
in the Newt by Miss Johnson, in the Frog by Spencer,
and in Alytes by Gasser. Its occurrence in the Cyclos-
tomata seems to point to the fact that it is a primitive
feature retained in those eggs whose development is not greatly
modified by the presence of a large mass of yolk. Renewed
observations in the development of Amphioxus would pro-
bably throw some light on this point.
The Central Nervous System.
The early development of the central nervous system has
been so fully described by Calberla, Balfour, and Scott,
that little is left to be added to their account. But the origin of
the neural canal, the relationship of the posterior end of the neural
cord to the blastopore, and the later development of the parts
of the brain and the cranial nerves present points of interest.
Calberla was the first to show that the central nervous
system of the Lamprey arises by a delamination and not by
an involution of the epiblast. He described a similar origin for
the nervous system of the Teleostei, and Balfour and
Parker found the same to be the case in Lepidosteus.
The first trace of theneural plate appears about the eighth day
after fertilization, just after the invagination is completed. A
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 330
shallow groove is seen running forward from the blastopore,
round about two thirds of the embryo and passing a little in
front of the blind end of the mesenteron. The groove is a very
temporary structure and is soon replaced by a ridge. This
arises by the epiblastic cells lining the groove, which are of a
columnar shape, budding off cells from their under surface.
The result of this is that a keel of cells is formed which forms
the neural ridge externally (fig. 12), and internally presses in
between the mesoblastic plates. The keel arises solely by the
epiblast cells budding off cells in their under surface only. It
is much deeper in the anterior third of its course, which region
ultimately forms the brain.
The keel in the course of two or three days loses its connec-
tion with the epidermis ; this occurs at first anteriorly and ex-
tends backward, and as Scott has pointed out, it does this of
itself and not by an ingrowth of the mesoderm in each side as
Calberla described.
Figs. 13, 15, and 16 show the solid neural cord lying above
the notochord, which by this time is separated off from the
hypoblast. It is important to notice that the neural canal
does not arise until after the connection between the neural
cord and epidermis is severed. It is about the origin of this
neural canal that my observations and those of Calberla and
Scott are at variance. They described the epidermic layer
of epiblast passing down into the nervous, in such a way that
the canal, when it does appear, is lined by this layer. I have
not been able to see any trace of this. The cells forming the
nervous system appear to me to be all split off from the under
surface of the epidermis in the dorsal middle line, and the
continuity of the epidermis in this region never seems to be
broken by any such invagination as they suggest. Balfour
was also doubtful on this point; but in his and Parker’s
work on the development of Lepidosteus, they state that
there is no evidence of the epidermic layer being concerned in
the formation of the canal.
The canal seems to arise as a split between the cells in the
axis of the solid cord, and not by the absorption of the central
304 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
cells, as has been suggested in the case of the Teleostei. It
appears at first anteriorly and extends backward, and for some
little time the walls of the lumen are by no means sharply
defined. Processes from the cells lining the canal project into
its cavity and suggest the idea that they have been torn out
from between the cells of the other side.
The neural cord remains solid at its posterior end for some
time, and here it becomes fused with the surrounding struc-
tures in a somewhat remarkable way. It does not fuse round
the blastopore as Scott describes, indeed it is not easy, con-
sidering its mode of origin, to see how it could; and there is
no hollow neurenteric canal. Figs. 14 and 15 represent two
sections taken through a larva just after hatching. Fig. 14 is
through the region of the blastopore. It shows the neural
cord with its canal already formed; beneath this lies the noto-
chord, and beneath this again asolid rod of cells which is con-
tinuous with the subnotochordal rod and the dorsal hypoblast.
This latter structure is the solid postanal gut. The mesoblastic
plates are seen separating off from the hypoblast yolk-cells
which occupy the remaining space with the epidermis. Dor-
sally this is produced to form the dorsal fin. Fig. 15 repre-
sents a section through the tail a little posterior to the blasto-
pore. Here the neural cord, notochord, and postanal gut have
fused into a rod-like mass of tissue which is ventrally con-
tinuous with the hypoblast cells; a few sections posterior to
this none of the three embryonic layers are distinguishable
except the epidermal portion of the epiblast. A longitudinal
median section through the tail is represented in fig. 20. This
shows the mass of indifferent tissue which lies in the tail and
which by internal differentiation gives rise, as the tail grows,
to mesoblastic somites, neural cord and postanal gut. This
mass of tissue, which in many respects reminds one: of the
growing point in a plant, may be called the primitive streak.
It is perhaps worth while to point out that it lies at what was
originally the anterior lip of the blastopore.
A similar mass of tissue formed by the fusion of the pri-
mary layers has been described by Balfour and Parker in
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 300
Lepidosteus, Spencer in the Frog, and Miss Johnson
in the Newt.
The further development of the central nervous system will
be described later after some of the details connected with the
mesoblast and hypoblast have been considered.
The Mesoblast.
The origin of this layer from the yolk-cells situated in the
angle between the epiblast and the invaginated endoderm has
been described above. For some little time the mesoblast re-
mains in the condition of two triangular masses of cells,
separated from one another dorsally by the notochord and ner-
vous system, ventrally by the yolk-cells which lie in contact with
the ventral epiblast. In the anterior end of the embryo the
mesoblast soon unites ventrally by lateral downgrowths; in
the trunk, however, which remains crowded with yolk-cells for
a week or ten days after hatching, this takes place much
later.
Scott has described the formation of the muscle-plates very
accurately, and it will therefore be unnecessary to give more
than a short résumé in order to make the following account
intelligible. About the twelfth or thirteenth day the meso-
blastic somites appear by the segmentation of the dorsal part
of the lateral mesoblastic plates. These appear at first ante-
riorly, and the segmentation extends backwards. The most
anterior one lies close behind the auditory sac. The ventral
unsegmented mesoblast has split into the splanchopleure and
the somatopleure on each side, and in the region just behind the
posterior gill-cleft these have met ventrally, forming a ventral
mesentery, connecting the alimentary canal with the ventral
body wall.
The mesoblast somites are shown in fig. 17, which repre-
sents a horizontal section through an embryo fourteen days
old. They are cubical masses of cells enclosing a small cavity,
often entirely obliterated, which represents part of the body
cavity. The cells surrounding this are at first uniform in size,
and each side is only one cell thick. Like the other cells of
306 ARTHUR HE. SHIPLEY.
the embryo they contain yolk granules, which are gradually
absorbed. In the tail region these mesoblastic somites con-
tinue to be segmented off from the primitive streak till five
or six days after the larva is hatched.
In transverse sections the mesoblastic somites appear trian-
cular, having a median side against the nervous system and
notochord, an external one against the epididymis and a ventral
one. Besides these there are the anterior and posterior sides.
The cells composing all these, except those of the external
layer, develope into longitudinal muscles. Whilst this is taking
place the dorsal surface of the embryo has become raised above
the general level, so that the embryo in section is no longer
round but pear-shaped.
As Stannius, Grenacher, and Langerhans _ have
shown, the muscles of the Lamprey fall into two groups, which
differ in structure as well as in their disposition. The first of
these form the myomeres, and are derived directly from the
mesoblastic somites ; the second comprise the muscles of the
eye, those belonging to the respiratory system, and those con-
nected with the upper and lower lip and mouth generally.
These seem to arise exclusively from the ventral unsegmented
parts of the mesoblast, and perhaps, in some cases, from wan-
dering mesoblast cells. The muscles of the heart resemble the
latter in many points.
Each myomere in the Lamprey or Ammoccete consists of a
number of plates of muscle-substance, lying one on the top of
another. Each plate is flat, and more less square in outline.
It is bounded anteriorly and posteriorly by the myotomes ex-
ternally by a connective-tissue layer closely connected with the
skin, and internally by a similar layer. Above and below, or
dorsally and ventrally, it is in contact with a similar muscle-
plate. In some myomeres which have become modified, such
as the anterior one which extends far forward over the ear, the
shape of the muscle-plate has lost its square outline and be-
come oblong, but in one of the myomeres of the trunk they
are almost square in longitudinal section.
From the above description it will be seen that each muscle-
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 337
plate or “ Kastchen” of Stannius occupies the horizontal
space between two myotomes, and that they lie one on another,
so that in a horizontal section we see only one, in a transverse
or vertical section we see one lying on another like sheets of
paper. Each “ muscle-plate” contains several nuclei, which
stain more deeply than the muscle-substance. It is trans-
versely striated, and faint longitudinal striz can also be de-
tected ; these correspond with fibrillz, into which the muscle-
substance easily breaks up. These latter are especially large,
and can be easily recognised in transverse sections near the
most external part of the ‘‘ muscle-plate.”’
The development of these muscle-plates is as follows :—
The outermost layer of cells forming the mesoblastic somite
does not appear to be converted into muscles. For along time
it persists as a definite layer of cubical cells with large nuclei
lying between the skin and the myomere; this is the case till
long after the other cells of the mesoblastic somite have deve-
loped into muscles. Finally, this layer seems to disappear,
but remains of it can still be distinguished lying just within
the skin, even when the myomere has assumed the appearance
characteristic of the full-grown Ammocete. This view that
the somatic layer does not take part in the formation of the
myomeres, is not in agreement with what Balfour has de-
scribed in the Elasmobranchs, where both the inner and
outer layer become muscular; but, on the other hand, the
muscles of the myomeres in Amphioxus appear to be de-
rived from the splanchnic layer only, and the same view is
supported by Gotte and the Hertwigs.
The remaining cells of the mesoblastic somite begin to
grow in between one another, and between each neighbouring
somite an intermuscular septum is deposited. The process of
growing in between one another is carried on until each cell
occupies the whole length from one myotome to the next, and
at the same time, each cell becomes somewhat flattened, so
that their transverse section, which was at first round, become
oval (fig. 24). At the same time longitudinal thickenings
occur in the cortical part of the cell, the medullary portion
308 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
remaining clear and staining very slightly. The nucleus lies
in this medullary portion. The longitudinal thickenings occur
at intervals, so that in transverse section the cortex of the cell
appears beaded ; these fine fibrille stain fairly well so that
they can easily be distinguished from the medulla. The flat-
tening of the cell goes on until the cell occupies the whole
space between two myotomes, not only longitudinally but also
transversely (fig. 25). The original nucleus of each cell
divides into two or three, so that in each of these plates of
muscle-substance two or three nuclei can be seen and an occa-
sional yolk granule, which is, however, soon absorbed. In
addition to the longitudinal striation caused by the thread-like
thickenings in the cortex, a transverse striation appears. Each
plate of muscle-substance remains in this condition, with a
clear unstained medulla containing two or three deeply stained,
large, flat, oval nuclei (fig. 18), with a well-marked nucleolus ;
enclosed by a cortex, for about two weeks after hatching. The
cortex consists chiefly of its dorsal and ventral walls, and each
of these is thickened at regular intervals by the above-men-
tioned fibrille. Each fibrilla runs the whole length of the
myomere and is inserted into the intermuscular septa behind
and in front. About a fortnight after the young Ammoceete
is hatched, the substance of the fibrille increases at the
expense of the medullary part, and this goes on until each
plate of muscle-substance consists exclusively of fibrillar sub-
stance. The nuclei have increased in number, but instead
of lying loose in medulla they become squeezed in be-
tween the fibrille, lose their regular shape and can only
be recognised as small flattened bodies which stain deeply.
The whole plate of muscle-substance now consists of fibrillar
substance which stains uniformly with here and there a more
deeply stained nucleus (fig. 29). The whole appears homo-
geneous, the fibrille cannot as a rule be recognised, though in
some cases they are seen in transverse section as dots. Each
<‘ Kastchen ”? now resembles fundamentally the muscle-plate of
the adult Lamprey ; and it will be noticed that each is a deve-
lopment of what was a single cell.
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 339
The second variety of muscle-fibre met with in the Lamprey
seems to be exclusively derived from the ventral unsegmented
mesoblastic plate, and from the walls of the head cavities.
The muscles with this origin are those which serve to move the
lips, the velum and the other structures of the mouth, and
certain muscles connected with the gill apparatus, and prob-
ably the muscles of the eye. These latter have the same
histological structure, but owing to the fact that the eye does
not develope until the Lamprey stage, no eye muscies appear
till very late in the life of the Ammoccete and I have conse-
quently been unable to follow their development.
The muscle-fibres of this second variety of muscle tissue,
consist of long tubular cells, cylindrical in shape, with a
medulla of clear substance which does not stain, and a cortex
which is thickened at intervals by longitudinal rods. These
give the cortex a beaded appearance in transverse section.
The medulla contains the nucleus, which stains deeply. This
is at first single, but subsequently divides until a row of nuclei
occupy the axis of the muscle-fibre, in some cases so closely
packed as almost to touch. It will be noticed that these
muscle-fibres resemble in the minute structure the first stage
in the development of the muscles forming the myomeres.
These muscle-fibres are transverse striated.
The fibres of the heart belong to this second variety, and are
developed from the same part of the mesoblast. They, however,
possess certain peculiarities. which will be described after the
formation of the heart has been considered.
The Heart.
The first appearance of the body cavity as a space takes
place in the region behind the posterior gill-cleft and in front
of the liver. The part of the embryo lying in front of this
region is at an early stage raised from the posterior half by the
backward growth of the head fold, and the embryo lies within
the egg-shell bent in half, the angle of the bend being just in
that region where the heart is subsequently formed. By this
means all those parts in front of the liver are free from the
yolk-bearing cells, and the lining cells of the mesenteron all
340 ARTHUR HK. SHIPLEY.
become columnar. In this anterior region the mesoblast soon
unites ventrally. In the posterior region the ventral union of
the mesoblast is delayed, the lateral plates of mesoblast lying
between the yolk-cells and the epiblast end in a free edge, and
until these edges unite, the yolk-cells are in contact with the
epidermis ventrally.
In the region between the liver and the last gill-slit the
mesoblast splits at about the fifteenth day into a somatic and a
splanchnic layer; between the two a well-developed body
cavity appears. The former layer lines the body wall, the
latter envelopes the alimentary canal. It forms a dorsal mesen-
tery supporting that structure, and a well-marked ventral
mesentery of considerable depth connecting the ventral wall of
the intestine with the body wall. It is in this ventral mesen-
tery that the heart is developed. The two layers forming the
mesentery fuse dorsally and ventrally, but separate from one
another in their middle, forming a cavity which is the lu-
men of the heart (fig. 24). Subsequently both the mesentery
connecting the heart with the alimentary canal—the meso-
cardium—and the ventral one connecting the heart with the
ventral body wall, atrophy and the heart lies as a tube uncon-
nected with the surrounding structures (fig. 25).
From the fact mentioned above that the mesoblast behind
the heart has not split into somatic and splanchnic layers nor
united ventrally, it will be seen that the cavity of the heart
communicates posteriorly with the space between the veutral
yolk-cells and the epidermis. Such a space would be equiva-
lent to part of the segmentation cavity. Soon after the heart
is formed such a space arises, and at once becomes crowded
with cells destined to form blood-corpuscles (fig. 26). At first
I was inclined to think that these cells were budded off from
the yolk-cells, but more careful observation has led me to
believe that they originate from the free edge of the lateral
plates of the mesoblast, which as I mentioned above are
growing down between the yolk-cells and the epiblast. These
corpuscles are oval with large nuclei, and they usually contain
at first one or two yolk granules which they soon absorb.
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 341
The cavity in which the corpuscles lie in great numbers is subse-
quently shut off by the mesoblast as it grows downwards and
becomes the subintestinal vein. It is from the first continuous
with the posterior end of the heart, and the corpuscles soon
pass from it into that organ. From the first appearance of
the heart in the ventral mesentery its walls have been double ;
the splanchnopleure having split into two layers, of these the
outer is at first much the thicker consisting of cubical cells ;
the inner layer is composed of comparatively flattened cells.
The heart at first is a straight tube of the same length as the
section of the body cavity in which it lies. Very soon, how-
ever, it increases in length, and thus becomes slightly twisted ;
at the same time two constrictions appear, dividing it into three
chambers. The most posterior of these is the sinus venosus ;
it is directly continuous with the space in which the corpuscles
are developing. By this time this space has acquired definite
walls by the downgrowth of the mesoblast in this region, and
it may now be spoken of as the subintestinal vein.
The liver which developes as a ventral outgrowth of the
intestine first makes its appearance in this space, and when the
latter gets closed off as a vein, the liver has become a branched
gland projecting into it, so that the blood returning from the
alimentary canal passes between the tubuliof the liver. Thus,
from the very first an hepatic portal system is present. The
tubuli of the liver do not appear to have any continuous meso-
blastic coating, though here and there a flattened cell can be
distinguished in the outside of a tubule.
The venous sinus communicates by a narrow opening with
the auricle or second chamber of the heart. This in its turn
opens by a similar narrow opening into the ventricle. This
latter opening is guarded by a pair of valves, which appear by
the tenth day after hatching; they effectually prevent any
regurgitation of the blood into the auricle. The walls of the
ventricle have undergone a considerable change. From the
cells of the inner lining a number of branched muscle-cells
have been developed (fig. 36). These cells stretch across the
cavity of the ventricle from side to side, and fuse and anas-
VOL, XXVII, PART 3.— NEW SER. B B
342 ARTHUR BE. SHIPLEY.
tomose with one another in a very complex manner. They
contain numerous nuclei, and show a longitudinal striation
though not a transverse one. The centre of the ventricle is
comparatively free from them, but at the sides they form a
spongy reticulum in the meshes of which corpuscles abound.
The ventricle passes anteriorly into the ventral aorta, and
at the point where the aorta passes into the solid tissue
between the gills there is another pair of valves resembling
the auriculo-ventricular ones. The ventral aorta, like the
other vessels, arises by a split in the mesoblast which subse-
quently acquires a definite wall. It passes forward as a single
vessel in the ventral median line until it reaches the thyroid
gland, and here it splits in two branches. Each branch then
passes forward on one side of this body, and ends in the most
anterior gill vessel. From the single part of the ventral aorta
three pairs of vessels are given off, passing in front of the
fifth, sixth, and seventh gill-slits respectively. The posterior
wali of the seventh cleft bears no gill filaments, and has no
vessel. From each side of the double part of the ventral aorta
five vessels are given off, the four posterior of these pass in
front of the first, second, third, and fourth gill-slits. The
most anterior is the vessel which in the earlier stages passes in
front of a gill-slit which subsequently disappears. In the
older embryos, when the mouth is fully formed it runs along
the base of the velum.
The vessels after traversing the gills unite in the dorsal
middle line to form the dorsal aorta; this runs backward to
the posterior end of the body, lying just underneath the noto-
chord. From its first appearance it gives off two transverse
vessels in the neighbourhood of the pronephros; these supply
the glomerulus. Anteriorly it gives off a pair of vessels to
supply the upper lip, the carotids. In the older larvz the
aorta gives off a vessel which passes dorsally up one myotome,
then along the dorsal surface of the myomere behind it, and
hence the blood is collected by a vein which returns it to the
posterior cardinal down the next myomere. The larve are
fairly transparent, and in each myotome these two opposite
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 343
currents can be seen, and along the top of each myomere a
backwardly directed stream. In the tail the aorta splits, and
one branch passes each side of the cloaca; they unite ventrally,
and are continued forwards as the subintestinal vein. Before
it splits it gives off a vessel which runs back along the base of
the notochord to supply the tail; this may be termed the
caudal artery. The blood from this is returned by a caudal
vein which soon splits into the two posterior cardinal veins.
These large veins run forward, one each side of the aorta:
the duct of the pronephros runs in their wall. Anteriorly
they unite with the anterior cardinals, and form two ducts of
Cuvier which open into the sinus venosus. The anterior
cardinals bring back blood from the head. The tubuli of the
pronephros lie in their cavity, so that the pronephros, like the
kidney of the Amphibia, has a double blood supply. The car-
dinal veins do not appear till after the subintestinal vein, which
for some little time is the only vein in the body. Later still a
vessel appears in the right side of the intestine, opposite the
subintestinal vein in the spinal fold; this, like the last named,
passes through the liver. In my latest stages also there is
an impaired vessel bringing blood back to the heart from the
ventral region of the gills; this is mentioned by Balfour.
The blood-corpuscles are of only one kind, large oval disc-like
structures, with a well-marked nucleus. The protoplasm
scarcely stains, but the nucleus assumes a deep colour.
Owing to the transparency of the larva, the circulation can
be watched with great ease. The walls of the vessels at first
possess no elasticity, hence great regurgitation takes place,
and the blood advances by a series of jerks. The valves at the
anterior end of the ventricle and between the auricle and the
ventricle prevent this affecting the blood in the heart.
The heart begins to beat long before the cells exhibit any
histological differentiation into muscles.
The Pronephros.
The first origin of the larval excretory system is by no means
easy to make out, as it arises at a period when the embryo is
344 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
crowded with yolk. Scott has described it fully, and in most
respects my observations confirm his. As he describes, the
first structure to appear is the segmental duct which is at first
solid. The cells forming this are derived from the mesoblast
cells which lie between the already segmented dorsal part of
the mesoderm and the ventral unsegmented portion. These
cells form a solid cord lying between the mesoblast and the
epiblast ; the cord continues to grow backward by a differen-
tiation of the cells in situ. A few hours later a lumen appears
in the centre of the cord by the separation of the cells; this
soon becomes elliptical in section (fig. 11). It opens into
the posterior part of the alimentary canal.
From this account it will be seen that at first the segmental
duct is between the mesoblast and epiblast; it, however, soon
comes to occupy a deeper position by the growth of the sur-
rounding tissue. So far we have only considered the duct in
that part of its coufse where the body cavity is not yet deve-
loped; but in the region of the heart, where the body cavity
has already appeared, its origin seems to be somewhat different.
The lumen of the segmental duct here becomes continuous
with a groove in the parietal peritoneum, lying near the angle
where the somatopleure and splanchnopleure diverge. When
this groove closes it leaves four or five openings which persist
as the openings of the ciliated funnels. This account of the
origin of the ciliated funnels agrees with that of Fiirbringer,
but differs from Scott’s, who describes the funnels arising
as blind projections of the segmental duct which acquire an
opening into the body cavity. Each funnel soon acquires
cilia, which extend for some distance down its lumen, and are
usually directed downwards towards the tubuli. The funnel
is composed of large cubical cells with a large nucleus, at its
lip it passes suddenly over into the flat cells of the peritoneal
epithelium. At its base it is continuous with a duct which
soon becomes elongated and coiled, and ultimately joins the
segmental duct. The walls of the tubuli are composed. of
large clear glandular cells. The posterior end of the seg-
mental duct opens into the cloaca
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 345
The segmental duct throughout its course runs in close
connection with the post-cardinal vein, lying in contact with
it, almost in its wall in the under and inner side. In
the anterior region this vein has so grown round the pro-
nephros that the tubuli really le inside it (fig. 29). The
tubuli are covered by a few flattened cells whose presence
becomes more obvious about the twenty-fifth day by a deposit
of dark brown pigment. The tubuli have thus a venous
blood supply. The glomerulus on the other hand is supplied
from the aorta. There is only one glomerulus on each side,
stretching each side of the alimentary canal and extending
through about the same space as the glandular part of the
kidney. Hach glomerulus is a diverticulum of the peritoneum,
which generally becomes sacculated ; it receives its blood by a
single vessel on each side directly from the aorta.
Since the time of Bowman it has been known that the
kidneys of Fishes, Frogs, and Snakes have a double blood
supply, the tubuli uriniferi being surrounded by a capillary net-
work of vessels which receive their blood from the renal portal
veins, and the glomerulus which is supplied with blood from
the aorta by the renal artery. It is an interesting fact to find
that a similar blood supply is present from the very first in
such a temporary organ as the pronephros of the Lamprey.
In the great majority of cases I found fine ciliated funnels
in each pronephros. The whole gland did not extend over a
greater space than that occupied by three myomeres, although
in some cases the ciliated funnels, which were of some length,
overlapped into a fourth myomere, but I was unable to coufirm
the relationship alleged to exist between the number of ciliated
funnels and the number of somites through which the pro-
nephros extended. .
The Skeleton.
The skeletons of the oldest larva at my disposition consisted
of the notochord derived from the endoderm, and of certain carti-
Jages in the head and branchial region derived from the lateral
mesoblast. The origin of the notochord has been completely
346 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
described by Calberla, Scott, and others, and I have nothing
to add to their account. In the histological differentiation of
the chord from a solid string of more or less cubical cells, to
the vacuolated cylinder which forms the permanent notochord,
there is a stage which is perhaps worth mentioning. In the early
stages a transverse section of the chord shows portions of three
or four cells, a little later these cells have pushed their way
between one another and arranged themselves in such a way
that they occupy the whole room inside the sheath of the
notochord. Whilst in this condition vacuoles appear in the
substance of the cells and for a day or two the notochord pre-
sents very much the same structure as the notochord of Amphi-
oxus. This is, however, soon replaced by the vacuolated
appearance characteristic of the notochordal tissue of the higher
Vertebrata (figs. 18 and 23).
The posterior end of the notochord passes into the indifferent
mass of tissue described in the tail. The anterior end is
slightly curved downwards apparently by the increased vertical
height of the brain. It ends just behind the infundibulum,
its end being in contact with the posterior end of the nasal in-
vagination. There is no trace that it has ever passed in front
of this point, although in the young stages it reaches relatively
almost as far forward as the nervous system. The relation of
its anterior end to the brain hence appears to be due to the
overgrowth of the nervous system anteriorly.
The cartilage which composes the rest of the skeleton is
characterised by the small amount of intercellular substance.
This stains very deeply. ‘The cells are large with usually only
one nucleus, though sometimes two. I have endeavoured to
represent this structure in fig. 19. The branchial bases are
the first part of the skeleton to appear. They arise about the
twenty-fourth day as straight bars of cartilage lying external
and slightly posterior to the branchial vessel. In their relation
to the vessel they correspond with the extrabranchial bars of
the Tadpole, and the Sharks. The true branchial bars run
internal to the branchial vessel.
The bars run behind the gill-slit to which they belong, and
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 347
there is no bar in front of the first persistent cleft. They are
slightly curved inwards towards the median linein the middle part
of their course where they bend round the external opening of
the cleft. About the thirtieth day they fuse with one another
ventrally and so two rods are formed which lie close together
in the posterior half of their course but diverge round the
thyroid. About the same time each bar sends forward two
processes, one above and the other below the opening of the
gill to which it belongs; these ultimately fuse with the pos-
terior edge of the gill bar next in front. The processes of the
most anterior bar fuse with each other. Dorsally the last six of
the bars also become continuous (fig. 42), and form two longi-
tudinal bars which run parallel and close to the notochord.
The most anterior bar does not join this rod but sends a process
inwards, serving to support the auditory capsule, which lies
just in front of it directly over the first persistent gill-cleft.
The first traces of the basi-cranial skeleton appear on the
thirtieth day as two rods of cartilage, the trabecule (figs. 40).
They he close against the notochord for their posterior two
thirds, anteriorly, however, they diverge and surround the
pituitary space. About six days after their first appearance
the trabecule send out laterally a transverse bar of cartilage
which passes out on each side in front of the auditory capsule,
lying between the ganglia of the fifth and seventh nerves. Pro-
fessor Parker has identified this as the rudiments of the pedicle
and pterygoid. ‘They lie in the tissue of the bar which is in
front of the first gill-cleft which has long ago disappeared.
Immediately beneath the trabecule the carotid artery runs
forward as an anterior continuation of the dorsal aorta. The
trabeculz have become continuous with the dorsal end of the
most anterior branchial bar, which is not united with the longi-
tudinal bar formed from the fused dorsal end of the other six.
The connection is very slight but is quite evident in sections.
between this and the dorsal end of the second bar some little
space exists, the latter when it commences lies at a slightly
lower level than the trabecule.
The above description represents the condition in my oldest
348 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
larva, fifty-two days (fig. 43). The further development of
the Lamprey’s skull has been deseribed by Professor Parker in
his great work on ‘The Skeleton of the Massipobranch
Fishes,’
The Mesenteron.
The cavity of the alimentary is formed by the invagination
of the endoderm described in the first section of this article,
when once found it does not disappear again, although in the
region of the intestine it may be reduced to a slit by the
pressure of the surrounding yolk-cells.
The most anterior section, including the branchial region
_ and that part of the intestine in front of the liver, is now
separated from the rest by the raising of the head and neck
from the remaining part of the embryo. The lining cells of
this portion at once assume a columnar character ; the hypo-
blastic cells in the region of the blastopore, or as it may now
be termed the anus, also assume a similar form. But the cells
in the middle part of the intestine still retain the features
of the yolk-cells, those forming the roof of the enteron being
however, rather more columnar than those of the floor and
sides.
In the head region almost the whole of the space inside the
epiblast is taken up with the brain, which has a great depth,
and with the notochord and the alimentary canal, which ends
blindly in front. A small band of mesoblast lies on each side
of the nervous system and notochord. This segments dorsally
into a series of myomeres, the first lying close behind the ear.
Ventrally the mesoblast has not grown down between the en-
doderm, so that along the sides and under surface the hypoblast
and epiblast are in contact. The first gill-slit appears, as Scott
has described, about the twelfth or thirteenth day, the others
arise eduring the next three or four days, the most posterior
being the last formed. The gill-slits appear to me to be the
result of the ventral downgrowth of mesoblast taking place
only at certain places, these forming the gill-bars. Between
each downgrowth the hypoblastic lining of the alimentary
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 349
canal remains in contact with the epiblast, and here the
gill opening subsequently appears about the twenty-second
day.
Huxley was the first to point out that the embryo
Lamprey possesses eight gill-slits, and his account has been
confirmed by Scott and Dohrn, who, however, point out
that the first slit remains closed, and does not open to the ex-
terior, as Huxley described. Dohrn has further shown that the
first or rudimentary gill-slit becomes converted in the ciliated
groove encircling the mouth, which was first described by
Anton Schneider in Ammocetes.
Fig. 27 represents a longitudinal horizontal section of the
head of a twenty-one days’ old embryo. The eight primitive
gill-slits are here shown lined by columnar epithelium, which
in the posterior seven is most flattened at those points where
the opening will subsequently appear. The corresponding area
in the first cleft, however, will be seen to be lined with very
high columnar cells. These cells afterwards acquire cilia and
come to lie in a deep groove.
The branchial vessels have only appeared in the first gill-
bars, but the cells which will be converted into the cartilagi-
nous gill arches have already become distinct (47. 6.). About
the twenty-second day a process begins to grow backward from
the middle of each gill-bar into the gill-slit behind. This re-
duces the slit to a <-shaped opening. After the opening to
the exterior has been established the gill-bars overlap each
other, the passage from the cavity of the mouth to the exterior
being directed outwards and backwards. Each gill-bar
acquires a few gill filaments, into which the blood courses.
The whole is covered by a layer of thick columnar epithelium
continuous with that lining the rest of the mouth, except cer-
tain small areas, mostly at the end of the short filaments,
where the epithelium has become suddenly thin, thus putting
the blood into closer communication with the surrounding
water.
The columnar glandular-looking cells which line so much of
the cavity of the mouth contain a number of very fine gran-
350 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
ules, which stain deeply with hematoxylin, giving the cell a
very characteristic appearance. I have been unable to form
any opinion as to the nature or fate of these granules.
The ciliated ring mentioned above is shown in section
in fig. 41, c.g. It lies close in front of the most anterior gill-
bar; ventrally its two halves converge and run back as two
parallel grooves to the opening of the thyroid gland in the
ventral median line. The grooves here unite, and after receiv-
ing the opening of the thyroid they continue as a single groove
running in the ventral median line as far as the most posterior
gill arch. Dorsally the grooves unite and become continuous
with a median dorsal ridge, which is covered by high columnar
cells, also ciliated. This ridge extends from the first gill arch
to the commencement of the wsophagus. Anton Schneider
describes a band of cilia running from this dorsal ridge on
each side along each gill arch. This is not present in my
oldest larva, but is no doubt formed later.
Dohrn (23) has recently described the development of the
thyroid so fully, and his paper is so beautifully illustrated,
that it appears to me to be superfluous to describe again the
origin of this organ. I can only confirm his results. He
deals at length with the homology of the thyroid of Ammo-
coetes, with the endostyle of Ascidians, and the hypobranchial
ridge in Amphioxus. And the homology of the circumoral
ciliated ring in Ammoceetes and Ascidians is also pointed
out. To these homologies we may add, I think, that of the
dorsal ciliated ridge of the young larval Lamprey to the dorsal
lamella of Ascidians, and the hyperpharyngeal groove of
Amphioxus. It isa curious fact, however, that in the last
animal the form of the structure is reversed. We find ven-
trally a ridge and dorsally a groove, whereas in Ammoccetes
and Ascidians we have the ridge dorsal and the groove ventral.
In spite of this, I think Dohrn’s arguments fully support the
homology of the ventral organs, and the same reasoning holds
good for the dorsal.
The alimentary canal behind the branchial region may be
divided into three sections. Langerhans has termed these
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 351
the stomach, mid-gut, and hind-gut, but as the most anterior
of these is the narrowest part of the whole intestine, it would
perhaps be better to call it cesophagus. This part of the ali-
mentary canal lies entirely in front of the yolk, and is, with
the anterior region which subsequently bears the gills, raised
from the rest of the egg when the head is folded off. In my
later larvee it is composed of a single layer of very high co-
lumnar cells, and is ciliated throughout. Round this is a thin
layer of cells, which, I imagine, give rise to the muscular
coats. The whole is supported by a dorsal mesentery, each
side of which lies the head kidney (fig. 25). The ciliated
columnar cells are directly continuous with those covering the
dorsal ridge of the branchial region, but not with those of the
ventral groove; this later connection must arise subsequently,
as Anton Schneider describes it in the fully-grown
Ammocete.
The mid-gut which follows the cesophagus is, in the
younger stages, crowded with yolk granules. The cells of the
roof soon acquire a columnar shape, whilst the ventral part
consists of a mass of cubical cells, each crowded with yolk.
By degrees the yolk is absorbed, and the cells assume the same
character as those lining the cesophagus. The lumen of the
mid-gut is very much larger than that of the esophagus, the
alimentary canal expanding suddenly at the commencement
ofthe former. The absorption of yolk takes place from before
backward, so that lumen and walls of the fore part of the mid-
gut assume their permanent size and form, whilst the posterior
half is choked with yolk. The lining high columnar cells are
ciliated and quite continous with those of the cesophagus.
By the time the yolk is all absorbed a longitudinal invagi-
nation of the wall of the mid-gut takes piace. This occurs
anteriorly on the left side, but twisting through a quarter of
circle it comes to lie in the ventral side posteriorly. The
ridge thus formed reduces the lumen of the alimentary canal
from a round to a reniform shape in section. In this ridge or
spiral valve runs the subintestinal vein, which has become
quite small and has lost its median ventral position. Around
aoe ARTHUR KEK. SHIPLEY.
this vessel, filling up the space between the two sides of the
spiral valve, is a quantity of fatty tissue. The cilia on the
inner face of the spiral valve are very evident.
The lumen of the mid-gut is so large that almost the whole
of the body cavity in that region of the Ammoceete is taken
up by this part of the intestine; consequently the liver, the
only gland opening into the mid-gut, is pushed forward and
lies on each side and below the esophagus. This gland has its
origin at a very early stage, about the fourteenth day, as an
evagination of the mid-gut, whilst the latter is still crowded
with yolk. The diverticulum thus produced grows out in the
ventral side of the alimentary canal into that space between
the hypoblast and epiblast which was mentioned above as
being crowded with blood-corpuscles. This space subsequently
becomes enclosed by definite walls by the downgrowth of the
mesoblast in this region. It becomes the subintestinal vein
which still continues to supply the liver with venous blood.
The single diverticulum soon begins to branch, and at an early
stage one of the branches becomes differentiated from the
others, acquires a large lumen, and forms the gall-bladder.
The cells forming the liver are cubical with large nuclei, they
do not appear to have a definite outer layer of flattened cells,
though occasionally such a cell is present. In the older larve
the gall-bladder has a great relative size. It lies embedded in
the liver on the right side of the cesophagus. The bile-duct
runs from it above the mid-gut, bending down to enter the
mid-gut in the spiral valve on the left side.
The hind-gut is smaller than the mid-gut, its anterior limit
is marked by the termination of the spinal valve, which does
not extend into this region. The two segmental ducts open
into it just where it turns ventrally to open to the exterior by
a median ventral anus. Its walls are in this region slightly
puckered. The cells lining it are not so high as in the other
parts of the intestine, but more cubical.
Its lumen is from an early stage lined with cells which
have lost their yolk, and it is in wide communication with the
exterior from the first. This condition seems to be, as Scott
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 353
suggests, connected with the openings of the ducts of the pro-
nephros, for this gland is completed and seems capable of
functioning long before any food could find its way through
the mid-gut, or indeed before the stomodzeum has opened.
The stomodzeum has a very early origin ; it commences on
the fifteenth day as an invagination of ectoderm against the
blind anterior end of the fore-gut. This gradually deepens
and attains a very large size, partly due to great development
of the upper lip, which grows forward and downward to con-
stitute the large hooded structure which is so characteristic of
the Ammocete. The greater part of this hood consists of
simple muscle-fibres which interlace and cross one another in
a diagonal direction. The lower lip does not reach so far for-
ward as the upper (figs. 84 and 35). About the twentieth day
the velum begins to appear in the posterior angle of the sto-
modeum. This structure is formed by two grooves which
gradually deepen and cut off a flap of tissue on each side of the
middle line. These two grooves, shown in fig. 27, are not very
deep. The tissue between them is broken through the next
day so that the two lateral folds that remain are covered on
their anterior face by epiblast, and on the greater part of their
posterior face by hypoblast (fig. 28). Subsequently the meso-
blast in these two flaps develope into muscle-fibres, and in the
young larva a constant current is kept up by them, passing in
at the mouth and out at the gill-clefts. This current is easily
demonstrated by the aid of a little Indian ink suspended in
the water.
On the twenty-third day two tentacles begin to grow out
from the under surface of the upper lip, one each side of the
middle line; a little later two more appear on the sides, but
placed more posteriorly ; later still two more appear behind the
level of the last ; these are situated at the junction of the lower
hip with the upper. Finally, a median tentacle appears in the
ventral middle line. This last is far longer than the others
and from its base a ridge, which is at first low, but increases in
height posteriorly, extends back between the ventral portion of
the ciliated ring (figs. 40 and 41). The number of tentacles
B04 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
is afterwards increased by a pair of new ones arising between
each of those already formed. The tentacles subsequently
become branched (fig. 39).
With regard to the mesoblast of the head I have little to
add to the descriptions of Balfour and Scott. The area
over which the gills extend at their first appearance extends to
the posterior boundary of the sixth myomere. The most
anterior myomere is situated close behind the ear, and the ear
lies above the hyobranchial or first persistent gill-cleft. So
that at their first appearance the six posterior gill-clefts cor-
respond in their extent with the six anterior myomeres. As
the larva grows the gill region appears to elongate with rela-
tion to the muscular myomeres, so in my latest larva there are
about nine myomeres over the area of the six gills (fig. 43).
These anterior myomeres become V-shaped with the open
angles directed forwards; turned the opposite way to those of
Amphioxus,
The mesoblast between the gills arranges itself into head
cavities (fig. 21), and as Balfour and Scott have already
shown, there are two head cavities in front of the hyomandi-
bular cleft. These are at first continuous, but with the for-
mation of the stomodzum they separate. One becomes pre-
oral and obviously corresponding with the preemandibular
head cavity of Elasmobranchs; the other with the mandi-
bular (fig. 21). The walls of these cavities ultimately form
the skeleton of the gill arches, the muscles of which are all
of the tubular kind. Owing to the rudimentary condition of
the eye in Ammoceetes, no eye-muscles are present and conse-
quently it is impossible to say whether or no they are derived
from the walls of the head cavities, but the researches of
Stannius and Langerhans have shown that they possess
the same histological characters as the muscles of the gills and
upper lip.
The Central Nervous System.
The development of the central nervous system has been
described above up to the stage when the central canal has
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 3855
first appeared. The lumen is at first circular in outline, and
the walls of the canal of uniform thickness (fig. 11). Ulti-
mately in the region of the body the lumen becomes elon-
gated and slit like (fig. 24); in the anterior end the Inmen
widens into the variously shaped cavities which form the
ventricles of the brain. The cells forming the walls of the
canal are primarily more or less cubical, but they soon
become spindle shaped, except those which form the roof
and the floor of the central canal. These are formed of
a single layer of short columnar cells. The canal is in
the youngest stages proportionately very much larger than in
the later; its size is diminished and its form altered by the
thickenings which take place in different parts of the brain.
The white matter first makes its appearance on the eighteenth
day as two thin bands, one on each side of the brain and
spinal cord (fig. 37). Later these unite in the ventral side
and form an anterior commissure. After the appearance of
the white matter the ganglion cells lose their spindle-shaped
outline and become again circular.
The cranial flexure is very slight; the anterior end of the
brain is, however, slightly bent down, and with it the anterior
end of the notochord (fig. 23).
About the sixteenth day considerable changes take place in
the brain; from the anterior and ventro-lateral angles of the
fore-brain two diverticula are given off; these are the optic
vesicles (fig. 30). They continue to grow upwards and back-
wards till their blind end reaches a position behind and above
the anterior end of the notochord.
At the blind end of the diverticulum a knob is formed by
the outer face proliferating cells, which form a multicellular
retinal layer. The posterior face later on developes pigment
in its cells. The lens is budded off from the inside of the
single layer of epidermis, and lies as a flattened mass of cells
close against the retinal layer (fig. 40). The stalk of the
primary vesicle becomes solid by its walls coalescing on all
sides, and forms the optic nerves. At their origin these nerves
form a commissure projecting into the cavity of the fore-brain
306 ARTHUR E,. SHIPLEY.
on its ventral side; by the twenty-second day this optic
chiasma is covered in by a single layer of ganglion cells. It is
this body that Dohrn has by mistake figured as the Tuber
cinereum (21). The commissure is shown in transverse
section in fig. 39; the lumen of the infundibulum is seen
below it, the cavity of the fore-brain above.
About the same time that the optic vesicles commence to be
given off from the anterior end of the brain a median dorsal
evagination also appears. It was mentioned above that in the
median line, both dorsally, ventrally, and in front, the central
canal is enclosed by a single layer of more or less columnar
cells, whilst the lateral walls are thick. This single layer is
interrupted ventrally by the formation of the optic chiasma.
Dorsally it is produced on the sixteenth day by the evagina-
tion in question, which is the rudiment of the pineal gland
(fig. 31). The walls of the pineal gland then consist at first
of a single layer of cells forming a hollow sac which pushes its
way between the brain and the epidermis, spreading out on all
sides (fig. 31). At first its lumen is continuous with that of
the fore-brain, but ultimately, by the folding of its walls, its
cavity is obliterated and the communication with the lumen of
the fore-brain is shut off.
The eighteenth day, two days after the first appearance of
the optic vesicles and the pineal gland, is the earliest date
on which I have been able to recognise the appearance of any
division into fore-, mid-, and hind-brain. On this day the
single layer of cells roofing the central canal becomes folded in
the manner indicated in fig. 23. This takes place at about
the level of the attachment of the velum, a little in front of
the ear. In larva of fifty-two days, this groove has not
changed its form, but has become deeper.
The division between the fore- and hind-brain is by no
means so well marked; indeed, I have been unable to find any
external groove, although it has been described by previous
writers. Longitudinal horizontal sections through the brain
show, however, that just behind the infundibulum and pineal
gland the walls thin out so that the lumen appears diamond
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 857
shaped. This thin wall I conclude makes the division between
the optic thalami and the crura cerebri.
The hind-brain and mid-brain resemble each other closely
in structure, the mid-brain being only a trifle larger. Their
cavity, which is at first slit like, becomes triangular by the
lateral growth of the roof which pushes the side walls apart
dorsally (figs. 40 and 41). This thin roof extends back as far
as the second gill-cleft, after which it disappears and the
nervous system has the structure represented in fig. 42.
About the forty-fifth day a median longitudinal fold appears
in the thin roof; this is the first of the numerous folds found
in the roof of the mid- and hind-brain of the adult (fig. 41).
The fore-brain still has its thick side walls, the optic thalami.
Just in front of the stalk of the pineal gland a commissure of
transverse fibres is found which runs from side to side on about
the twenty-third day. This commissure corresponds with the
Commissura tenuisima, described by Ahlborn in his
exhaustive work on the brain of the adult Lamprey. It also
probably corresponds with the commissure found by Balfour
in Scyllium situated just in front of the base of the pineal
gland. Osborn has recently described a similar commissure
in the brain of the Amphibia, Menopoma, Meno-
branchus, Amphiuma, and Rana, and I have adopted the
name he proposes for it, the Superior Commissure. The com-
missure of the pineal stalk in the Mammalian brain seems to
occupy the same relative position. This superior commissure
is at first covered with but a few ganglion cells, but these
afterwards increase until two bodies are formed, the Ganglia
Habenule. The left one is very small (fig. 39), but the right is
a structure of considerable size, projecting downwards and back-
wards, and reducing the lumen of the fore-brain to a Y-shaped
slit. These bodies have been fully described by Ahlborn in
the adult ; it is interesting to note that the curious asymmetry
they possess is present from their first appearance. No other
commissure has made its appearance by the fifty-second day.
The cerebral hemispheres show some signs of appearing as
lateral outgrowths in my oldest larvae, but no trace of paired
VOL, XXVIT, PART 3,—NEW SER. Gc
358 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
lateral ventricles are to be seen. The lateral outgrowths of
the hemispheres embrace between them a mass of tissue formed
at the back of the olfactory pit, which resembles in every way
nerve matter. This structure is shown in figs. 33, 34, and 35,
drawn from a series of sections taken through the head of a
fifty-two days’ larva. This tissue in question appears to con-
sist of ganglion cells. It is traversed by a canal which ends
blindly behind and opens by the median nasal pit in front.
Posteriorly it is continuous with a sheet of tissue which is de-
scribed by Dohrn and Scott as giving rise to the pituitary
body (fig. 39). Unfortunately my larve were not sufficiently
old to enable me to determine whether this mass of tissue
comes into closer relation with the brain and forms the olfac-
tory lobes, or whether, as seems more probable from what we
know of the development of these structures in other animals, it
forms only the peripheral portion of the olfactory apparatus.
About the twenty-fifth day some of the ganglion cells in the
postero-lateral angle of the grey matter become much larger
than the surrounding ones. These cells are particularly fre-
quent in that part of the hind-brain lying between the audi-
tory capsule. They probably develope into the “outer large
cells” of Reissner.
With regard to the development of the cranial nerves, I
have no observations on the origin of the olfactory nerve, as
this apparently does not arise till a much later stage than that
attained by my oldest larvee. The origin of the optic nerve as
an outgrowth of the brain has been described above. Owing
to the rudimentary condition of the eye, the muscles of that
organ are not developed, and consequently the third, fourth,
and sixth nerves do not arise till a much later stage. This
leaves the fifth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth nerves to be
considered.
The origin of these nerves is much obscured by the yolk
which crowds the cells of the embryo at the time they first
appear. On the seventeenth day the first origin of the ganglia
in the fifth and seventh nerve is seen. The ganglia arise as
proliferations of the epiblast. By this means a knob of cells
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 309
is formed, which arises at about the level of the notochord
(fig. 32). This heap of cells arises close behind the lens of the
eye, but seems to be distinct from it. It is divided into a
larger anterior part, which belongs to the fifth nerve, and a
smaller posterior portion, which forms the ganglion of the
seventh. The roots of the nerves seem to me—though it is
difficult to be certain on this point—to arise as outgrowths
from a neural ridge in the lateral surface of the brain; these
grow down and fuse with epiblastic thickening. This origin
of the roots of the nerves corresponds with that described by
Balfour, Marshall, Van Wijhe, and Beard, in the
Elasmobranchs, and differs from what occurs in the Am-
phibia as described by Spencer, where the nerve also is
derived from the inner layer of epiblast. As Spencer sug-
gests, this is probably due to the presence of a double layer of
epiblast, the epidermic and nervous, in the Amphibia.
By the nineteenth day the ganglion of the fifth nerve has
completely separated off from the skin. It has now divided
into two portions, which have, however, a common root taking
its origin from the hind-brain just in front of the ear. The
most anterior part forms a large ganglion on the root of a
nerve which runs over the eye (fig. 22). This is the oph-
thalmic ganglion, and the nerve is the ophthalmic branch of
the trigeminus; it probably corresponds with the portio-
profunda of the ophthalmicus superficialis of the Elasmobranchs.
Immediately behind the ophthalmic ganglion, but quite dis-
tinct from it, lies the ganglion of the other half of the fifth
nerve. From this a mandibular nerve proceeds to run close
behind the mouth, and later a maxillary branch appears pre-
orally. In the angle between these ganglia the eye lies. The
nerve connecting the ophthalmic with the main ganglion of
the fifth nerve, described by Ahlborn in the adult, is not found
at this stage, and both the ganglia are of approximately equal
size.
The seventh nerve arises behind the fifth and enters its
ganglion, which, when separated off from the epiblast, lies close
in front of the ear capsule (fig. 38). In early stages,
360 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
whilst the most anterior gill-cleft—spiracle—is still present,
the nerve can be seen passing from the ganglia between the
rudimentary gill-cleft and the first persistent one—the hyo-
branchial. Later on the ganglion increases in size, and ex-
tends round the under and inner face of the auditory sac
towards the ganglion of the ninth nerve, but it never quite
reaches it, and the connection between the ganglion of the
seventh and of the tenth nerves must be of: later origin.
Neither does the ganglion of the seventh fuse with that of the
fifth, though they are close together, and the root of the
seventh does not enter the ear capsule to leave it again, as is
the case in the adult. After the appearance of the ciliated
ring in the place of the first gill-cleft, the seventh nerve sup-
plies this structure.
A few fibres from the brain enter the recessus labyrinthi
of the ear; these arise close to the root of the seventh, and
constitute the eighth nerve.
The ganglia of the ninth and tenth nerves would seem to
arise from a mass of cells split off from the epiblast close
behind the ear. At a little later stage the ninth nerve has its
ganglion lying close against the posterior boundary of the ear ;
the nerve is continued along the posterior wall of the first
persistent cleft, the hyobranchial. The ganglion seems to be
still connected with the ganglion of the tenth nerve. This is
a very large structure; it lies more dorsally than the others and
it is in close connection with the mid-brain, having as yet deve-
loped no root. Behind it and connected with it lies a ganglion
which is situated dorsally above the second persistent gill-cleft ;
from this chord the main branch of the vagus is continued
backward, lying just external to the anterior cardinal vein
(fig. 42). In front of each remaining cleft the chord bears a
large ganglion, so that, counting the first, there are six distinct
ganglia borne on the vagus. Ihave not been able to trace the
fibres of this nerve beyond the last gill-cleft, but my friend
Mr. Ransom, of Trinity College, tells me he has traced the
vagus into the heart in the adult Petromyzon. Each of the
ganglia in the vagus supplies the gill-cleft behind which it lies.
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 361
There is no trace of the ramus lateralis of the vagus even in
my oldest larve.
The ganglion on the ninth nerve lies in front of the first
myomere, between that and the ear, whilst that of the vagus
lies between the first and second. The first dorsal root of the
spinal nerves with its ganglion lies between the third and
fourth myomere. Behind this there is a dorsal ganglion lying
opposite each myotome.
Sagemehl (17) has described very correctly the origin of
the spinal nerves. The dorsal roots with their ganglia arise
from a neural ridge which is at first of the same size all along.
From this the ganglia begin to grow out about the eighteenth
day, intersegmentally, that is opposite the myotomes. The-
ganglia are in connection with one another for some time by a
longitudinal commissure. This commissure appears to consist
of the remains of the neural ridge; it ultimately disappears, as
in Elasmobranchs. The dorsal nerves, after leaving the
ganglia, run into the myotomes and eventually, I believe, reach
the skin, though on this point I cannot be quite certain. On
the other hand the ventral roots consist of nerve-fibres only,
and run straight into the myomeres. They appear, according
to Sagemehl, very soon after the first appearance of white
matter in the chord, and they never have any connection with
the dorsal roots. The resemblance between the distribution of
the spinal nerves of this larva with those of Amphioxus as
described by Rohon is very striking.
The ear is formed, as Scott has described, from an invagina-
tion of the epiblast. This appears very early about the four-
teenth day. It soon deepens and becomes completely shut off,
consisting then of an oval vesicle with a dorsally placed stalk,
the recessus labyrinthi. This last is the remains of the duct
leading to the exterior. The ear is in the same condition in
my oldest larve. No signs of the semicircular canals have
appeared. The epithelium lining the vesicle is high and
columnar; about the twenty-second day certain patches of the
epithelium become higher than the others and the cells develope
each a very large cilium which projects into the cavity and
362 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
bears a knob at its free end (fig. 41). About the same time a
number of small concretions appear in the ear. These form
the numerous spherical otoliths.
Summary.
I have now described the structure of the chief organs in
my oldest larva, and I propose to conclude this paper by a brief
summary of the results obtained.
In the first place the mesoblast is not completed ventrally by
a layer of cells split off from the hypoblastic yolk-cells, as
Scott has described. But the ventral mesoblast is formed by
the downgrowth of the mesoblastic plates, which ultimataly
meet and unite in the ventral middle line.
The blastopore does uot close up, as later observers have
maintained, but, as Max Schultze described thirty years ago,
it persists as the anus. There is no neurenteric canal, though
a solid strand of tissue proceeds back from the alimentary
canal and fuses with an indifferentiated mass of cells, into which
the nervous system and mesoblast also pass.
The lumen of the alimentary canal is that of the mesenteron ;
it does not become obliterated during larval life. In its anterior
end the hypoblast remains in connection with the epiblast at
certain points, and here the gill-clefts arise ; between these the
mesoblast grows down and forms the gill-bars. The origin of
the ciliated ring and the hypopharyngeal groove and hyper-
pharyngeal bar are also described, and the ciliated condition
of the esophagus and stomach.
The “ muscle- plates,” whose structure is so peculiar in the
Lamprey, arise each from a single cell of the mesoblastic
somites. This increases in size, slides in between the neigh-
bouring cells, and ultimately occupies the whole of the space
between two myotomes. Its nucleus divides until each cell
contains several nuclei. Striated fibrils then appear and in-
creases till the whole ‘ muscle-plate ” consists of little else be-
sides these fibrils, squeezing between them a few nuclei. These
“ muscle-plates ” arise from the segmental half of the meso-
blast ; the muscles of the gills, lips, and probably of the eye,
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 363
have a different structure and arise from the ventral unseg-
mented part.
The blood-corpuscles arise from the ventral free edges of the
mesoblast, before they unite in the ventral middle line, they
collect in a large sinus just behind the heart. The heart
appears in the ventral mesentery, formed by the union of the
lateral mesoblastic plates ; at first its lumen is continuous with
the sinus just mentioned. This sinus lies between the hypo-
blastic yolk-cells and the epiblast; it subsequently acquires
walls and forms part of the subintestinal vein.
The ciliated funnels of the pronephros are left as apertures
by the segmental duct which in its anterior end is formed from
agroove. The groove closes up at intervals, leaving four or five
openings which become the funnels. They do not arise as
blind projections from the duct, which subsequently, acquire
ciliated openings. From the first the pronephros has a
double blood supply, pure blood from the aorta passing to the
glomerulus, and impure blood in the cardinal veins surrounding
the tubuli.
The early development of the skeleton is described up to the
stage where Professor Parker commenced his researches.
The canal of the central nervous system developes after the
neural chord has separated off from the epidermis; it does not
appear to be lined by any invaginated epidermis, as Calberla
and Scott maintained.
The first sign of differentiation of the parts of the brain is
the formation on the sixteenth day of the optic vesicles and
pineal gland. The division into fore-, mid-, and hind-brain
appears soon after, but the fore- and mid-brain are not sepa-
rated by any well-marked groove. The first transverse com-
missure to appear is situated just in front of the stalk of the
pineal gland. It forms the superior commissure of Osborn.
Afterwards the ganglion cells thicken round it and form the
asymmetrical ganglia habenule.
The ganglia on the fifth, seventh, ninth, and tenth nerves
are derived from epiblastic thickenings. Their roots probably
arise as outgrowths from the neural ridge. The ganglion of the
364 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
fifth divides into two parts, the ophthalmic and mandibular ;
these have a common root.
The seventh nerve at its first appearance supplies the first
or spiracular gill-cleft ; when this is converted into the ciliated
ring it continues to be supplied by the seventh nerve.
The connection between the fifth, seventh, and tenth nerve
ganglia does not exist and must be of later origin.
The tenth nerve has a large ganglion on its root and bears a
ganglion above each of the last six gill-clefts. No trace of the
ramus lateralis is to be seen.
The origin of the ganglia on the cranial nerves has no
relation to the sense-organs of the skin; these have not
appeared even in my oldest larva.
LIveERATURE REFERRED TO.
(1) 1836. Jon. Miitter.—‘ Vergleichende Anatomie der Myxinoiden, der
Cyclostomen mit durchbohrten Gaumen,’ Berlin.
(2) 1851. Srannrus.—“ Ueber den Bau den Muskeln bei Petromyzon
fluviatilis,” ‘ Gottinger Nachrichten,’ 1851.
(3) 1856. Aue. Mitier.—“ Ueber der Entwicklung der Neunaugen,”
‘Miiller’s Archiv,’ 1856.
(4) 1856. Max Scuuttz.—‘ Die Entwickelungsgeschichte von Petromy-
zon Planeri,’ Haarlem.
(5) 1864. Ave. Mijiter.—* Beobachtungen iiber die Befruchtungserschein-
ungen im Ki der Neunaugen,” ‘ Verhandl. d. Konigsberger
Phys.-dkonom. Gesellsch.’
(6) 1867. GrenAcHER.— Beitrage zur Erkenntniss der Muskeln der Cyclo-
stomen und Leptocardier,” ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xvii.
(7) 1870. Owssannixow.— The Development of Petromyzon fluvia-
tilis’ (Russian).
(8) 1878. Paut LancErnans.—“ Untersuchungen iiber Petromyzon
Planeri,” Freilung, i B., 1873.
(9) 1873. Witu. Mtrier.— Ueber die Hypobranchialrinne der Tunika-
ten und deren Vorhandsein bei Amphioxus und den Cyelo-
stomen,” ‘Jen. Zeit. f. Med. u. Naturwiss.,’ Bd. vii.
(10) 1875. Witn. Mitter.—* Ueber das Urogenitalsystem des Amphioxus
und der Cyklostomen,” ‘ Jen. Zeit. f. Med. u. Naturwiss.,’ Bd. ix.
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON
(11) 1877.
(12) 1877.
(13) 1878.
(14) 1879.
(15) 1880.
(16) 1881.
(17) 1882.
(18) 1882.
(19) 1883.
(20) 1883.
(21) 1883.
(22) 1884.
(23) 1885.
FLUVIATILIS. 365
E. Carpurta.—* Der Befruchtungsvorgang beim Petromyzon
Planeri,” ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xxx.
HE. Carperta.—* Zur Entwicklung des Medullarrohres u. der
Chorda dorsalis der Teleostier und der Petromyzonten,”’ ‘Morph.
Jahrbuch,’ Bd. iii.
KuprrerR UND Brenecxe.— Der Vorgang der Befruchtung am
Ki der Neunaugen,” ‘ Festschrift zur Feier von Th. Schwann,’
Konigsberg.
Anton ScHNEIDER.—‘ Beitrage zur vergleichenden Anatomie und
Entwicklungsgeschichte der Wirbelthiere,’ Berlin, 1879.
W. B. Scorr.—* Vorlaufige Mittheilung. ib. d. Entwicklungs-
geschichte d. Petromyzonten,” ‘ Zool. Anzeiger,’ Nos. 63 and 64.
Nvrt.—“ Recherches sur le développement du Petromyzon
planeri,” ‘Archives de Biologie,’ T. ii.
SaceMenL.—‘ Untersuchungen iiber die Entwicklung der Spinal-
nerven,’ Dorpat, 1882.
W. B. Scort.—* Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Petro-
myzonten,” ‘Morph. Jahrbuch,’ Bd. vii.
W. K. Parker, “On the Skeleton of the Marsipobranch Fishes,”
“ Phil) Trans; Part 1, 1883.
AHNLBORN.—“ Untersuchungen tiber das Gehirn der Petromyzon-
ten,” ‘Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’? Bd. xxxix.
Doury.— Die Entstehung der Hypophysis bei Petromyzon
Planeri,” ‘ Mitth. aus der Zool. Stat. zu Neapel.,’ Bd. iv.
Autporn.—< Ueber den Ursprung und Austritt der Hirnnerven
von Petromyzon,” ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xl.
Dourn.— Die Thyroidea bei Petromyzon, Amphioxus und Tuni-
caten,” ‘ Mitth. aus der Zool. Stat. zu Neapel., Bd. vi.
366 ARTHUR E. SHTPLEY.
EXPLANATION OF PLATES XXVI, XXVII, XXVIII,
and XXIX,
Illustrating Mr. Arthur E. Shipley’s Paper on “ Some Points
in the Development of Petromyzon fluviatilis.”
Reference Letters.
a. Anus. a.c. Anterior cardinal. ao. Aorta. au. Ear. aur. Auricle.
b.c. Body cavity. 4/. c. Blood-corpuscles. dp. Blastopore. 4Gr.'-dr.8 First
to eighth gill-clefts. 67.4. Skeleton of branchial bars. 47.v. Vessels of bran-
chial bars. c. Cerebral hemispheres. c.g. Ciliated groove. a. Dorsal fin.
d. 1. Dorsal lamella. d.m. Dorsal mesentery. e. Hye. e.g. Egg membrane.
ep. Epiblast. . 6. Fore-brain. fg. Fore-gut. g. Groove between mid-
and hind-brain. g. 4. 2. Left ganglion habenule. g. 4. 7. Right ganglion ha-
benule. g/. Glomerulus. g.z. Ganglion cells at base of olfactory invagination.
Ah. Heart. Ad. Head. Ad. c. Head-cavities. 4.6. Hind-brain. hy. Hypo-
blast. 7¢. Iter a tertio ad quartum venticulum. ¢zf Infundibulum. Ui. ¢.
Liver tubules. 7.7/7. Lower lip. J. ¢. Lamina terminalis. m. Mesenteron.
m.6. Mid-brain. m. br. Muscle of branchial bar. mes. Unsegmented mesoblast.
mes. som. Mesoblastic somites. m./. Muscle-fibre of heart. m.g. Mid-gut. m.
Muscle-plate. my. Myomere. x. Notochord. za. Olfactory invagination.
n.r. Neural ridge. uw. Nucleus of muscle-plate. 0. e. Ciliated epithelium
lining nasal invagination. op. ch. Optic chiasma. op. Ophthalmic ganglion.
op. th. Optic thalami. op.v. Optic vesicle. p.g. Postanal gut. pix. Pineal
gland. pit. Pituitary body. pr. Primitive streak. +. 7. Recessus labyrinthi.
s. c. Segmentation cavity. s. cm. Superior commissure. s.d. Segmental duct.
sm.pl. Somatopleure. sp.c. Spinal cord. sp. gl. Spinal ganglion. sp. pl.
Splanchnopleure. st. Stomodeum. s.v. Sinus venosus. ¢. Tentacles. 7h.
Thyroid gland. ¢. Trabecule. ¢ub. Tubule of pronephros. a. 7. Upper lip.
v. Velum. v. ao. Ventral aorta. ven. Ventricle. v./f. 6. Cavity of fore-
brain. v. 4. 6. Cavity of hind-brain. v.7. Ventral ridge in mouth. vv.
Valves of the heart. y.c. Yolk-cells. V.g. Ganglion of fifth nerve. V.g.e.
Fpiblastic ingrowth to form ganglion of fifth nerve. VJI. g. Ganglion of
seventh nerve. X.g. Ganglion of tenth nerve.
PLATE XXVI.
Fic. 1.—Spermatozoa of Petromyzon fluviatilis.
Fig. 2.—Segmenting ovum at the completion of the third or equatorial fur-
row. e.g. Egg membrane.
Fic. 3.—Segmenting ovum, showing the next two vertical furrows which
have divided the upper cells and are extending into the lower.
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 367
Fic. 4.—Ovum after the invagination is complete, twelve days old, showing
the blastopore, dp., at posterior end of the neural ridge, x. r.
Fic. 5.—Transverse section through ovum of thirty-six hours. ep. Epiblast.
s.c. Segmentation cavity. y.c. Yolk-cells.
Fie. 6.—Transverse section through ovum of forty-eight hours. s. ¢. Seg-
mentation cavity. ep. Epiblast. y.c. Yolk-cells.
Fic. 7.—Transverse section through ovum of sixty-seven hours.
Fie. 8.—Transverse section through ovum of eighty-six hours, showing
epiblast gradually thinning out.
Fig. 9.—Longitudinal section through commencing gastrula, 136 hours.
bp. Blastopore. hy. Hypoblast. y.c. Yolk-cells. m. Mesenteron. s.c. Seg-
mentation cavity.
Fic. 10.—Section through embryo of about the same stage as Fig. 4.
bp. Blatsopore. y.c. Yolk-cells. Ad. Head.
Fic. 11.—Transverse section through the body of an embryo just before
hatching, seventeenth day. sp.c. Spinal cord. 2. Notochord. m. Me-
senteron. mes. Mesoblast. s. d. Segmental duct. Zeiss’s A, oc. 2,
cam. luc.
Fic. 12.—Transverse section through embryo of thirteenth day. sp. ¢. Spinal
cord. 2. Notochord. mes. Mesoblast. m. Mesenteron. y.c. Yolk-cells.
Zeiss’s A, oc. 2, cam. luc.
Fic. 13.—Transverse section through embryo of fourteen days. Letters
asin Fig. 12. Zeiss’s A, oc. 2, cam. luc.
Fie. 14.—Transverse section through tail of larva twenty days old. Sp. C.
Spinal cord. 2. Notochord. p.g. Solid postanal gut. mes. Mesoblast. dp.
Blastopore. d./. Dorsal fin. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3, cam. luc.
Fic. 15.—Transverse section from the same series as Fig. 14, but posterior
to blastopore. d./f. Dorsal fin. mes. Mesoblast. pr. Fused tissue of noto-
chord, spinal cord, and postanal gut, or primitive streak. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3,
cam. luc.
Fig. 16.—Transverse section of embryo just before hatching, seventeen
days, through region of blastopore. dp. Blastopore. sp. c. Spinal cord. x.
Notochord. y.c. Yolk-cells.
Fie. 17.—Longitudinal section of embryo, showing formation of somites.
n. Notochord. mes. som. Mesoblastic somites. sp.c. Spinal cord. d./,
dorsal fin.
Fic. 18.—Longitudinal section of embryo just before hatching. sp. c. Spinal
cord. my. Myomere. sm. pl. Somatopleuric layer of somite. sp. p/. Splanch-
nopleuric layer. 2. Notochord. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3, cam. luc.
Fic. 19.—A piece of the cartilage of a branchial bar.
Fic. 20.—A longitudinal vertical section through the tail of a larva twenty-
368 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
one days old. a. Anus. p.g. Solid postanal gut. x. Notochord. sp. ¢.
Spinal cord. pr. Primitive streak. y.c. Yolk-cells.
- Fic. 21.—A longitudinal section through side of head of seventeen days’
embryo, showing the first three evaginations to form gill-clefts, and the true
head-cavities. aw. Har. Ad. c’. aud hd. ec’. The first and second head-cavity.
br., br?., and dr3, The first rudiments of gill-clefts. 7. v. The vessels of
gills. s¢. Stomodzum. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3.
PLATE XXVII.
Fie. 22.—A longitudinal section through side of head of a larva twenty-
one days old. au. Har. e. Hye. dr'., dr?., br’., br*. The first to fourth
primary gill-clefts. 4.6. Hind-brain. ops. Ophthalmic ganglion. V. g.
Ganglion in main branch of fifth nerve.
Fic. 23.—A median longitudinal section through the head of a larva twenty-
one days old. pin. Pineal gland. op.ch. Optic chiasma. if. Infundibulum.
n. Notochord. st. Stomodeum. 477. Second primitive gill-cleft. ¢. Thyroid
gland. za. Olfactory invagination. pi¢. Pituitary invagination. m. 6, Mid-
brain. #%.%. Hind-brain. g. Groove between mid- and hind-brain. J. é.
Lamina terminalis.
Fic. 24.—Transverse section through the body of a larva of twenty days.
sp.c. Spinal cord. fg. Fore-gut. . Notochord. som. pl. Somatopleure.
sp.pl. Splanchnopleuric layers of myomeres. 0. ¢. Body cavity. 4%. Heart.
c.f. Ciliated funnel. s. d. Segmental duct. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3, cam. luc.
Fic. 25.—Transverse section through trunk of larva about twenty-four days.
Letters as in Fig, 24, and ao. Aorta. a.c. Anterior cardinal. d.m. Dorsal
mesentery. sp. gl. Spinal ganglion. g/. Glomerulus. Zeiss’s C, oc. 1,
cam. luc.
Fic. 26.—Section through embryo, one day before hatching, seventeen days
old, cut whilst in the egg-shell. 4 Heart. sp.pl. Splanchnopleure. sm.pi.
Somatopleure. 477. and ér*. Seventh and eighth gill-clefts. Ad. Head-cavities
behind these. y.c. Yolk-cells. m.g. Mid-gut. 6. c¢. Body cavity. Zeiss’s
A, oc. 3, cam. luc.
Fic. 27.—Longitudinal horizontal section through a larva about twenty-two
days. dr!.—dér*, The eight primary gill-clelts. dr. v. Vessels of gills. dr. 6.
Branchial bars. jf. g. Fore-gut. ¢ub. Tubule of pronephros. s¢. Stomodeum.
v. Velum. g.. Ganglion cells at base of nasal invagination. op. ch. Optic
chiasma. iz/. Infundibulum. v./. 6. Cavity of fore-brain. x. Notochord.
Zeiss’s B, oc. 1, cam. luc.
Fic. 28.—Longitudinal horizontal section through larva of thirty-six days.
u.l. Upper lip. v. Velum. 7. Thyroid gland. 2. ao. Ventral aorta. ven.
DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 369
Ventricle. aur. Auricle. vv. Valves. s.v. Sinus venosus. Ji. ¢. Liver
tubules. m.g. Mid-gut. ér. 4. Branchial bars. v. r, Ventral ridge. my,
Myomere. Zeiss’s A, oc. 1, cam. lue.
Fig. 29.—Transverse section through pronephros of larva of forty-seven
days. x. Notochord. m.p. Muscle-plates. xz. Nucleus. ao. Aorta. a. c.
Anterior cardinal. g/. Glomerulus. ¢wd, Tubules. s. d. Segmental duct.
bl. c. Blood-corpuscles. /. gy. Fore-gut. d.m. Dorsal mesentery. Zeiss’s D,
oc. 1, cam. lue.
Fic. 30.—Transverse section through fore-brain of embryo, seventeen days.
na. Olfactory epithelium. op. v. Optic vesicle. ». fb. Cavity of fore-brain.
Fig. 31.—Transverse section through thalamencephalon of larva of eighteen
days. pin. Pineal gland. op. ¢h. Optic thalmi. v.f 4. Cavity of fore-brain.
na. Olfactory epithelium.
Fic. 32.—Transverse section through region of mid-brain of larva of sixteen
days. st. Stomodial epithelium. V. g. e. Epiblastic origin of ganglion of fifth
nerve. 2. Notochord. m.6. Mid-brain.
Figs. 33, 34, and 35.—A series of sections through the anterior end of head
of a larva fifty-two days old, to show the ganglia cells at base of olfactory
epithelium, w. 7. Upper lip. 7. 7. Lower lip. ¢. Tentacles. gy. z. Ganglion
cells at base of nasal invagination. o0.e. Ciliated epithelium lining nasal in-
vagination. ec. Cerebral hemispheres. v./. b. Cavity of fore-brain.
PLATE XXVIII.
Fie. 36.—Branched muscle-fibres of heart of larva forty-nine days old.
bl. c. Blood-corpuscles. m.f Muscle-fibre cut across.
Fic. 37.—Transverse section through the hind-brain, showing appearance of
white matter and ganglion of fifth nerve. 4.4. Hind-brain. s¢. Stomodeum.
V. g. Ganglion of fifth nerve. This section is rather oblique.
Fie. 38.—Transverse section through hind-brain, showing origin of ganglion
of seventh nerve from epiblastic ingrowth. VZJJ. g. Ganglion of seventh
nerve. az. Auditory vesicle. f. g. Fore-gut.
Fie. 39.—Transverse section through fore-brain of larva forty-nine days
old, toshow superior commissure. piz. Pineal gland. v./.6. Cavity of fore-
brain. s. cm. Superior commissure. g. 4./. Left ganglion habenule. gy. 4.7.
Right ganglion habenule. op. ch. Optic chiasma. pit. Pituitary body. inf.
cavity of infundibulum. «7. Upper lip. /.¢. Lower lip. ¢. Tentacles.
Zeiss’s C, oc. 1, cam. lue.
Fic. 40.—Transverse section through mid-brain of larva of forty-nine days.
t. Iter a tertio ad quartum ventriculum. e. Eye. ¢r. Trabecule. vv. r,
Ventral ridge. Zeiss’s C, oc. 1, cam. luc.
370 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY.
Fic. 41,—Transverse section through hind-brain of larva of fifty-two days.
v. h. 6. Cavity of hind-brain. au. Har. r./. Recessus labyrinthi. VJ. g.
Ganglion of seventh nerve. d./. Dorsal lamella. c.g. Ciliated groove. v.7r.
Ventral ridge. v. Velum. ao. Aorta. Jdr.v. Branchial vessels. Zeiss’s A,
oc. 3, cam. luc.
Fic. 42.—Transverse section through region of sixth gill-bar of fifty-two
days’ larva. Or®. Sixth gill-bar. sp. g/. Spinal ganglion. ao. Aorta. a. c.
Anterior cardinal. ér.v. Branchial vessels. a@o.v. Ventral aorta. J. 9.
Ganglion in tenth nerve. d.7. Dorsal lamella. dr. 6. Skeleton of branchial
bars. m. 47. Branchial muscles.
PLATE XXIX.
Fic. 43.—Drawing of larva of fifty-two days. The notch in the liver,
behind the heart, is due to the large gall-bladder, through whose walls the
cesophagus is seen. This drawing was made by Mr. E. Wilson from the living
specimen.
THE AMMONIACAL DECOMPOSITION OF URINE. 371
The Ammoniacal Decomposition of Urine.
By
Wim. Robert Smith, M.D., D.Se., F.R.S.Ed.,
Examiner in Chemistry and Forensic Medicine, University of Aberdeen.
With Plate XXX, figs. 1 and 2.
Wuen freshly voided, healthy urine, as is well known, is a
clear, transparent, amber-coloured fluid, with a distinct acid
reaction, and a peculiar aromatic odour. [If left to itself in an
open vessel slight clouds of mucus soon appear which gradually
sink to the bottom. After a time the acid reaction is noticed
to be slightly increased, and crystals of uric acid and oxalate
of lime are deposited. After a longer or shorter interval, de-
pendent on the temperature of the surrounding media, this
marked acidity begins to diminish and finally disappears, the
urine becomes lighter in colour, a whitish scum forms on the
surface, and the well-known ammoniacal odour indicates that
it has become alkaline ; the uric acid crystals disappear, and
whitish granules of urate of ammonia and prismatic crystals
of urate of soda take their place, beautiful crystals of phosphate
of magnesia and ammonia being subsequently thrown down.
The increase of acidity is called by Scherer the acid fermen-
tation, and is considered by him to be owing to the presence
of the vesical mucus. The alkaline change is spoken of as the
alkaline or ammoniacal fermentation, and is owing to the de-
composition of the urea into carbonate of ammonia.
These so-called fermentative changes are well known, and
have long been recognised. So far back as 1682 Van Helmont
spoke of the odour of urine as the effect of a putrefactive
372 WILLIAM ROBERT SMITH.
ferment, and later on Boerhaave, in a work published in London
in 1732, makes direct mention of the presence of ammonia in
urine as the result of decomposition.
The source of the ammonia was, however, first clearly under-
stood in 1799, when Cruickshank, Fourcroy, and Vauquelin
discovered urea, the two latter observers showing that carbonate
of ammonia was the principal product of its distillation, and
they further pointed out the relationship between the conver-
sion of urea in solution in water into carbonate of ammonia by
heat, and the spontaneous “ fermentative” decomposition of
urine. With a more accurate knowledge of the composition of
urea the reason of its conversion into carbonate of ammonia
became clearer, but the discovery of Proust that freshly voided
urine could be kept for years in a well-stoppered flask without
undergoing any change first led him to conclude that the action
of air, especially of its oxygen, was necessary for its decompo-
sition. Later authorities attributed the decomposition to the
presence of a ferment, taking its origin in the putrid destruction
of the mucus.
Our ideas on the subject were, however, thoroughly changed
by the work of Pasteur in 1860. He introduced fresh urine
into a glass flask, boiled it for a few minutes, and then effectu-
ally closed the flask by fusing its neck. He then found that
urine thus treated remained fresh for an indefinite period.
If, after the lapse of five or six weeks, he introduced into such
urine pieces of asbestos which had been freely exposed to the
air, decomposition speedily occurred, giving rise to the am-
mouiacal smell and the development of numerous organisms,
monads, vibriones, bacteria, &c. If, however, the asbestos,
previous to its introduction, had been well heated in a blow-
pipe flame, no change whatever took place in the urine. It
was thus clearly shown that the ammoniacal change in urine
was directly owing to the introduction of germs from the air, and
subsequently Pasteur and Van Tieghem' showed that in every
fermenting ammoniacal urine the presence of micro-organisms
1 Recherches sur la fermentation de l’urée, etc.,’ ‘Comptes rendus,’ T.
lviii, p. 210—264, 1864.
THE AMMONIACAL DECOMPOSITION OF URINE. 373
could be abundantly demonstrated, and to the presence of these
the destruction of the urea was to be traced.
The importance of these experiments was at once manifest,
not only as giving a clearer explanation of the changes in
urine, but also as indicative of the cause in fermentation gene-
rally, and in the present day we all recognise the importance
of Pasteur’s work as being the foundation of our methods of
inquiry into the causes of infectious diseases.
Two questions now naturally present themselves for con-
sideration :
1. Whether these organisms, which cause the alkaline fer-
mentation, always gain admission from without, or whether
freshly voided urine contains such germs, so that unboiled urine,
carefully protected from contact with the air, may still de-
compose; which would admit of the conclusion that the
elements of fermentation do not always arise from without ?
2. What particular organism causes the alkaline fermenta-
tion, or are several kinds involved ?
(1) As regards the entrance of the organism. It has been
shown by Cazeneuve! and Livon, and Meissner? that perfectly
fresh urine may be preserved free from any fermentative change
by eliminating the possibility of the entrance of air and germs,
and Professor Leube, by a series of ingenious experiments, has
shown that normal urine, on its exit from the bladder, contains
neither fungi nor germs, the development of which would cause
decomposition of the urea. Further, by the exposure for a few
minutes of nutrient gelatine in shallow glass vessels such as
those used in plate cultivations, micro-organisms may be culti-
vated from the air, which, when isolated, are found to be
capable of giving rise to the decomposition of sterilised urine,
and which, in form and general characters, are found to be
identical with the organisms present in decomposed urine.
(2) Is the ammoniacal change in urine due to the presence of
one or more organisms? It is with the object particularly of
dealing with this question that I have lately carried on an in-
1 ¢Comptes rendus,’ T. Ixxxiv, p. 571, 1877.
2 ¢ Deutsche Zeitschrift fiir Chirurgie,’ Bd. xiii, p. 344, 1880,
VOL. XXVI1, PART 3.—NEW SER, DD
374 WILLIAM ROBERT SMITH.
vestigation under the direction of Dr. Klein at the Brown
Institution.
I would, however, in the first place call attention to a valuable
paper published last year by Professor W. Leube, to which I
am indebted for much information, in which he describes
at some length a series of experiments undertaken by Dr. E.
Graser and himself with the view of determining the particular
organisms which produce the alkaline urinary fermentation.
He mentions that, as the result of their experiments, they were
able to isolate “ four well-described varieties” which possessed
this property, two of them to a very great extent, and the re-
maining two only in a feebler sense.
The strongest influence he found to be exerted by small bacilli
which he designated the Bacterium urex. These bacilli
are described as being of a uniform size, ‘001 mm. in thickness,
of an average length of ‘002 mm., with rounded ends.
The second growth of most frequent occurrence is a micro-
coccus of a globular form, and all of equal size, about °8 m.
(008 mm.) in diameter. They are occasionally united to form
diplococci, or two diplococci may join to form a square.
They do not liquefy gelatine.
The two remaining organisms which are said to possess a
weaker and less constant action are:
J, Small and thick bacilli of an oval shape with a varying
length of 1:2 m. to 15 m., their greatest width being always
‘7 or ‘8 m.
2. Very minute bacilli with a length of from 1:2 to 1:4 m.,
and a thickness of °6 m.
With the view of further investigating the life-history of the
organisms producing this fermentation, I took a quantity of
ordinary normal urine which had been recently voided and
divided it into two parts; one part I placed aside in a sterilised
beaker to allow of decomposition taking place in the ordinary
way ; the other part I boiled in a sterilised flask for half an
hour. I then filtered it into another sterilised flask, taking the
ordinary precautions, and finally decanted it into a number of
sterilised test-tubes which were subsequently steamed for
THE AMMONIACAL DECOMPOSITION OF URINE. 370
twenty minutes on two successive days in the steam of boiling
water ; the tubes were then placed in an incubator, and after an
interval of three weeks were still found to be sterile without
the slightest trace of ammonia being present.
Sterile neutral urine was prepared in the same way.
In starting the cultivation of the organisms I adopted the
plan described by Dr. Klein at a recent meeting of the
Chemical Society. The fine end of a freshly made capillary
pipette was placed in the ammoniacal urine, and a little
allowed to ascend in the tube by capillarity ; a number of tubes
containing nutrient gelatine were then inoculated by passing
the pipette through the cotton-wool plug and allowing a drop-
let of the urine to pass out; the tubes were then placed in
water having a temperature of about 40° for the purpose of
melting the gelatine; they were then gently shaken so that
the droplet which had been introduced should be uniformly
distributed, the gelatine being subsequently poured out, with
the usual precautions, into the lower of the two dishes used in
plate cultivations and allowed to reset. After this had oc-
curred, the glasses were placed on a glass plate, covered with
a Bell jar containing a piece of moist blotting paper and main-
tained at a temperature of 20° C. in an incubator.
By these means after the introduction of the smallest droplet
a large number of organisms was obtained, and by the subse-
quent processes of ‘ fractional cultivation’ and “ dilution ”
these were isolated, and the tubes containing the acid and
neutral sterile urine inoculated with them with the view of
determining the particular organisms producing the ammo-
niacal change.
By these methods I was able to isolate about twenty dif-
ferent organisms, both bacilli and micrococci, but after re-
peated experiments I only found one organism—a micrococcus
—able to decompose the urea into carbonate of ammonia. It
would be tedious and serve no useful purpose to describe each
of these organisms, and so I shall confine my remarks to a
description of that one which induces the desired change.
If a plate cultivation be made of this micrococcus, and kept
376 WILLIAM ROBERT SMITH.
at a temperature of 20° C., in twenty-four hours a number of
small points are visible which by an ordinary magnifying glass
are seen to have a faint outline, and to be scattered uniformly
over the surface ; in two days they are very distinct and are
seen as circular whitish spots of the size of a fine point.
These spots do not increase much in size, and in a few days
liquefaction of the gelatine commences.
In tube cultivations, in which the solid gelatine is inocu-
lated by means of a platinum wire inserted for some distance
in the depth, the tubes being subsequently placed in an incu-
bator at 20° C., in twenty-four hours the channel of inocu-
lation is visible as a pale whitish streak made up of closely
placed minute dots; these in a few days so enlarge that an
appearance is presented of more or less parallel lines of small
dots, at the same time that the growth spreads over the surface
as a whitish film. In about three or four days the first trace
of liquefaction is seen with slight depression of the surface ;
this liquefaction gradually extends downwards from the sur-
face, the liquefied part being thick and uniformly turbid.
The accompanying drawings (Pl. XXX, figs. ] and 2) show
these characteristics, and fig. 2 the amount of liquefaction which
had taken place in eighteen days, the tube having been inoculated
on the 12th July, and the sketch made on the 30th July.
Microscopically, the micrococci are seen to be mostly single,
or diplococci; there are, however, a few short chains and a few
small groups of four, five, to eight.
With this organism I inoculated both acid and neutral
sterile urine, and in twenty-four to thirty-six hours the
ammoniacal change took place. I also inoculated the fluid
recommended by von Taksch, consisting of one litre of water,
one eighth gramme of acid phosphate of potash, one sixteenth
gramme of sulphate of magnesia, and three grammes of urea
with a like result.
Therefore, so far as my observations go, the ammoniacal
decomposition of urine is brought about by the presence of a
micrococcus which differs from that described by Professor W.
Leube, inasmuch as it liquefies gelatine. Whether this organism
THE AMMONIACAL DECOMPOSITION OF URINE. 377
is identical with the organism known since Pasteur and Cohn
(‘ Zeitsch. f. Biol.,’? A. Pfl. ii) as the Micrococcus uree I
cannot say, because the characters of this latter had—at
the time when Pasteur and Cohn investigated them—not been
so studied by plate cultivation, &c., as they now are.
I have not been able to detect any other organism having a
like effect, although it is possible that there are such pos-
sessing this quality in an inferior degree.
DESCRIPTION OF PLATE XXX, figs. 1 and 2,
I}lustrating Dr. Wm. Robert Smith’s Paper on “ The Ammo-
niacal Decomposition of Urine.”
Fie. 1.—Showing dotted appearance of the organism in the depth of gela-
tine, with surface film, and commencing liquefaction at surface.
Fic. 2.—Showing the amount of liquefaction which had taken place in
eighteen days from the date of inoculation of a gelatine tube with the
Micrococcus uree.
ai ne
Siti: vs ung
Li ; hater he * pit
Pe ae sy ay Seu NE oi es Teer ee aie ae
Beuhi dl Riedie AOMSPeR Ps or ole ea OR
Nioiinped thee wea sleien sce i henge ae
. jh ew ON tomer fa bw cae Ho a go
ian y “FR nine = =
i ) ae "
‘ é y .
~—
4
| &
<3 [ wad y f J 94 i
oe ‘ ee
Pv ahee i fi :
' My
ie
ey al ean alayy i F 1 P4i( iA w Dentin Ola jie H af,
‘ : % " a | >
7 ic er) le tL Mw
: Ly Lite (mhatkaem al Teale sida ia STereics | A a”
+ ?
iw amr 4 AWS oN A. a Fi i) ste anliwe E.
; +s oui ive Warps 1) tun Bs
® » = , a” 2 4
Wh ia ww, alana Mii wali UngTatry ' a. ait " tid 1 ae
Lilie oe 90h von mye ith ig pat hii edt «Panhine . ¢ i |
gate ji AS “ Leo iO NVT ts AL 7
/ ¢ oi 1 a)
“ ’ a ; rn : va i . 7. i
- :
ae 7 | _ =, 5
, 5th » 7 Ll c-9 aay
SS 7 . }
higg D* es i
- ‘ Ph => -
; ‘
-
THE FUNCTION OF NETTLEOCELLS. 393
The Function of Nettlecells.
By
R. von Lendenfeld, Ph.D., F.L.S.,
Assistant in the Zoological Laboratory of University College, London.
With Plate XXX, fig. 4.
MorPHo.oey.
Both in the ectoderm and the entoderm of all Polypomedusze
these elements are met with. They are never absent in the
ectoderm in any species, and are generally also found in the
entoderm.
Their structure has been investigated by numerous authors ;
particularly F, E. Schulze (1), O. Hamann (2), Korotneff (3),
and the author (4) have studied their structure and action
more closely. Also Jickeli (5) has dwelt on this subject.
However different the animals may be on which these Nettle-
cells are found, the latter nevertheless are always of the same
structure, although they may vary very much in size. The
large ones are fewer in number and more determinate in their
position than the small ones. No Nettlecells of the large kind
are found in the entoderm.
The Nettlecells, or, as Schulze calls them, cnidoblasts, consist
of a cell the greater portion of which is occupied by the well-
known highly refracting vesicle, on the size of which the
size of the whole cnidoblast depends. The granular proto-
plasmatic portion of the Nettlecell is reduced in bulk so much
that it only forms a thin coating over the surface of the vesicle.
In one locality this plasmatic coat is slightly thickened, and here
the flattened nucleus, closely attached to the vesicle, is situated.
394 R. VON LENDENFELD.
From the upper margin of this protoplasmatic sac which
surrounds the vesicle, a conical, stout and pointed filament, the
cnidocil, projects. This is about as long as the vesicle is
broad, and is situated in such manner oblique to the surface as
to form with it an angle of 45°. This angle is very constant.
The cnidocil always points in a centrifugal direction, that is to
say the cnidocils on the tentacles point towards the ends of the
tentacles, those on the body point towards the mouth, and so
on. The cnidocils invariably point in that direction from which
a foreign body is most likely to approach the animal.
The vesicle itself possesses a very distinct, tough, and appa-
rently elastic membrane. It is closed on all sides except the
anterior end, where a circular aperture, about a quarter as wide
as the vesicle, is situated. This aperture leads into a very long
tube, when the ecnidoblast has exploded. This tube is about
twenty times as long as the cnidoblast and tapers towards the
end, which appears pointed. It is surrounded by one or two
spiral lines of minute hooks or bristles which are often very
large and conspicuous at the base, but which rapidly decrease
in size distally and become invisible even with the highest
power near the end. The tube is probably closed at the end.
This tube can be ejected with great force from the capsule of
the cnidoblast, where it is coiled up very regularly before the
explosion. The explosion inverts this tube hanging down
from the orifice of the capsule into its interior, so that the
external surface of the coiled-up tube becomes the internal
surface of the ejected tube and vice versa. The well-known
poisonous effect of these cnidoblasts is due to a poison which is
contained in the interior of the coiled-up tube, and which, as
the tube is inverted, comes to be situated on the outer surface.
The tube penetrates, by the force of its ejection and in conse-
quence of its small size, soft foreign bodies which may come in
contact with the animal, and so the poison is transmitted into
the body of the victim. Whilst Mébius and others have
studied the tube and capsule, the discovery of the cnidocil was
made by F. E. Schulze.
After these facts had been made known, the question arose
THE FUNOTION OF NETTLECELLS. 395
whether the cnidoblast was in connection with the nervous
system described particularly by the brothers Hertwig. Such
a connection has been demonstrated in many cases by Jickeli,
the author, and Korotneff.
In the lower strata—subepithelium—of the dermis, ganglion
cells are met with in those parts generally where cnidoblasts are
situated. These ganglia cells are multipolar. Their processes
are connected with slender nerve-fibres extending tangentially
between the mesodermal jelly (the supporting membrane,
Stiitzlamelle) and the outer epithelium. Some of these pro-
cesses, however, extend in a radial, centrifugal direction, and
these are connected with the large cnidoblasts. No con-
nection has hitherto been observed with sufficient certainty
between the ganglion cells and the small enidoblasts.
The protoplasmatic outer portion of the cnidoblast is pro-
longed into a process extending centripetally like a peduncle.
This is composed of granular protoplasm and forms the
connection between the cnidoblast and the ganglion cell below.
Hamann found that these peduncles, in some cases at least, were
not formed of granular protoplasm, but appeared as transparent
and structureless peduncles formed of the same substance
as the supporting mesodermal membrane. Subsequently I was
able to demonstrate that the large cnidoblasts have two pedun-
cles, one a transparent supporting rod as described by Hamann,
and one a granular thread, which connects it with the ganglia
cells of the subepithelium. Whilst the former is always quite
straight, the latter generally appears more or less curved and
irregular.
These cnidoblasts are surrounded by high and slender cylins
drical ciliated cells which form the outermost layer, or they
penetrate the large cells of the outer epithelium. In those parts
where the epithelium is formed by flat and low pavement cells,
large cnidoblasts are never observed.
The small cnidoblasts, however, are scattered over the surface
more indiscriminately and occur in great abundance also in the
pavement cell areas. In these areas a subepithelial layer of
ganglion cells seems not to occur.
396 R. VON LENDENFELD.
PuHysIoLocy.
F. E. Schulze, who discovered the cnidocil, was of opinion
that any foreign body touching the cnidocil would cause an
explosion of the Nettlecell, much in the same way as touch
invariably causes a sting in the case of the stinging-nettle. To
this end it appeared that the cnidocil was so placed as to point
towards the ends of tentacles, that is, always in that direction
whence an enemy would be most likely to approach. The
position of the stinging hairs of Urtica is the same.
Others who dwelt on the subject endorsed Schulze’s purely
mechanical explanation, that direct pressure on the enidocil is
transmitted to the cnidoblast and there causes the explosion of
the capsule which is already in high tension.
If this were so there would apparently be no reason for the
connection of the cnidoblast with the nervous system of the
animal.
Now, it is a well-known fact that touch by no means invariably
causes the explosion of the Nettlecells and the ejection of the
tube. Ifa tentacle of an Actinia is viewed under the micro-
scope in seawater under a cover-glass, and if fine grains of sand
are placed in the water and a strong current produced by suction
on one end, then the sand-grains are carried to and fro with
great velocity by the moving water and continually come in
contact with the surface of the tentacle. No explosion of a
Nettlecell, however, can be observed. But if acetic acid be
added to the water then the tubes will be seen shooting forth
like rockets all over the surface.
When the animals, as they often do, contract themselves and
draw up their tentacles like the Medusze to one hundredth part
of their length, or close them over the mouth like the Actiniz,
there must be a very strong pressure, which according to the
mechanical theory would immediately explode all the Nettle-
cells.
There are some species of Actinia which live in sand, as, for
instance, the Cerianthus, Those which live in shallow water,
THE FUNCTION OF NETTLECELLS. 397
or between tide-marks, bury the body in the sand and expand
their tentacles in the surface of the sand, the waves move the
sand and it is evident that masses of sand must be continually
falling on the tentacles. I have often observed a species of
Actinia exceedingly abundant in the “ sands” of Port Phillip,
Victoria, and I know that they do not retract their tentacles
when the water moves and the sand drops on them.
According to the mechanical theory, each sand-grain which
came into contact with the tentacles would cause the explosion
of a great number of Nettlecells. It is evident that this
cannot be so.
Further, there are Nettlecells embedded in the jelly of the
umbrella of some Medusz (discovered by me, l. c., over the
marginal bodies of Crambessa mosaica) which explode if
the surface of the body is touched with acetic acid instan-
taneously and long before the acid could have got to where
they are situated.
This will show that touch is by no means sufficient to cause
the explosion of the Nettlecells; nor is it the only possible
cause.
It would now seem possible that the cnidoblasts were
exploded at the will of the animal by a contraction caused
consequent on a centrifugally acting nervous irritation in the
plasmatic mantle surrounding the capsule. Chun (6) has
observed muscular differentiations in this plasmatic mantle in
Physalia, which is one of the severest stinging Ccelenterates.
Others have been inclined to consider the peduncle as
muscular and contractile.
If we were to assume this we should not be able to see the
use of the cnidocil.
It seems, therefore, that there can be but one explanation of
the mode of action of the cnidoblasts—of the large kind, at least
—which is the following :
1. The structureless peduncle is a support and may contract
so as to withdraw the cnidoblast with its lid from the surface
under certain circumstances, particularly when the parts where
the Nettlecell is situated are to be contracted. The animal has
898 R. VON LENDENTELD.
control over these movements by means of the subepithelial
nervous layer situated below the cnidoblasts.
2. The granular peduncle is a nerve-fibre connecting the
protoplasinatic mantle of the Nettlecell with the nervous system
of the animal.
3. By means of this the movements of the protoplasmatic
mantle can be controlled.
4. The explosion of the enidoblast is caused by the contraction
of the plasmatic coat which surrounds the capsule, and which
in Physalia (Chun, |. c.) has partly been converted into a
network of muscular fibres.
5. The plasmatic contractile coat of the cnidoblast is incited
to action by the cnidocil. Ifanything touches the enidocil then
the plasma mantle contracts and the tube is shot forth.
6. The animal can, however, by its volition prevent this
reflex action by means of the nerve-fibre connecting the cnido-
blast with the ganglia cells below. In this way the explosion
may be prevented even if the cnidocil be touched, if this be the
wish of the animal.
We find, accordingly, that the complicated machinery of
nerve-centres controlling reflex actions of a low order in man
and the higher animals is found also in these low forms of
animal life, the Colentera.
The Ctenophora, which are destitute of cnidoblasts, possess
in their stead certain structures, the “ Klebezellen”’ of Chun and
the “ Stiftzellen ”! of Hertwig, which appear homologous with
these Nettlecells in the Ctenophora. Their action is very different
and they do not explode like the cnidoblasts of Polypomeduse.
It seems, however, probable that they are in a similar way
subject to the control of the animal, as is the cnidoblast.
' These are, according to my investigations of the histology of Nais cor-
digera, Les., (7), not a sensitive apparatus, as the brothers Hertwig had
assumed, but stinging hairs.
THE FUNOTION OF NETTLECELLS. 399
PAPERS REFERRED TO.
1. F. E. Scuurze.—“ Ueber Syncoryne Sarsii, Lovén, und die zuge-
horige Meduse Sarsia tubulosa.”
2. O. Hamany.—“ Der Organismus der Hydroidpolypen.” ‘Jenaische
Zeitschrift fiir Naturwissenschaft,’ 1881, Band 15. ‘‘ Ueber Nessel-
kapselzellen,” |. c.
3. Korotnerr.—* Ueber Siphonophoren.” Mittheilungen aus der zoolo-
gischen Station in Neapel, 1884.
4, R. v. Lenpsnretp.— Ueber Coelenteraten der Siidsee. iii., Ueber
Webrthiere und Nesselzellen,”’ ‘ Zeitschrift fiir wissenschaftliche Zoo-
logie,’ 1883, Band 388, p. 366.
5. C. Jickeu1.—“ Ueber den Bau der Hydroidpolypen,” ‘ Morphologisches
Jahrbuch,’ 1882.
6. C. Cuun.—* Die Natur und Wirkungsweise der Nesselzellen bei Coe-
lenteraten,” ‘ Zoologischer Anzeiger,’ Band 4, p. 646.
7. R. v. Lenpenretp.— Nais cordigera, Les.,” ‘ Zeitschrift fiir wis-
senschaftliche Zoologie,’ Band 41, p, 673.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXX, fig. 4,
Illustrating R. von Lendenfeld’s Paper on “‘ The Functions of
Nettlecells.”
Fic. 4.—Schematic representation of cnidoblast, &e.—a. Mesodermal sup-
porting lamella. 6. Peduncle (Hamann’s) of cnidoblast. ¢. Ordinary cylin-
drical epithelium cells. d@. Their nuclei. ¢. Longitudinal striated muscles.
J: Subepithelial muscle-cells. gy. Their nuclei. /. Subepithelial ganglion cell.
i. Tangential nerve-fibre. 4. Nucleus of the ganglion cell. 7. Epithelial sen-
sitive cell. m. Its nucleus. x. Palpocil (Wright). 0. Cilia of the ordinary
epithelium cells. y. Nerve connecting ganglion cell with cnidoblast. g. Pro-
toplasmatic contractile mantle of cnidoblast. 7. Nucleus of enidoblast. s.
Nematocyst. ¢. Its aperture. w. Cnidocil (Schulze), v, Thread coiled up
inside the cnidoblast,
i: _ 7
7 | = | i » “Sov e
« sallaclanlonbcasth' sag iis YL hah, BU. AV Sale ‘ee -
ee |
sip aie fui ere Lo ae “wis be
SA ¢ Ta 7 Mery) Pf? Aer: | ‘
. y ah 2
RTM hil a LL 5 nit fy os.
ra . J will “ “i ( 7% i 4 } “
o oo eta
7 d vf
. = ’ éf . " -
? . 4 if rt
a
z
:
:
_
f °
:
: ij
a
tA
7
;
ZOOSPORES IN THE SAPROLEGNIEA. 427
On the Formation and Liberation of the
Zoospores in the Saprolegniez.
By
Marcus M. Hartog, D.Sc., M.A., F.R.U.E.
I. Tue ForMATION OF THE ZoosPoreEs.
THE zoosporange of the Saprolegniee has long been a
favourite object for the study of cell development; but only
within the last few years has an insight been obtained into the
great complexity of the phenomena attending the formation
and the liberation of the zoospores. These were first described
by Biisgen (“‘ Die Entwicklung der Phycomyceten-sporangien ”
in ‘ Pringsheim’s Jahrbiicher,’ vol. xiii, 1882);' and, a little
later, independently by Marshall Ward (‘Observations on
Saprolegniez ” in ‘ Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science,’
N.S., vol. xxiii, 1883).
The following is an abstract of the nearly concurrent results
obtained by these two observers. As is well known, the
zoosporange is formed by the enlargement of the end of a
hypha. The protoplasm streams into this enlargement and
becomes dense, its transverse septum then isolates the zoo-
sporange, which contains one large centre vacuole, or, in
Achlya, often several small ones. A blunt beak-like enlarge-
ment forms at an undetermined place (usually the apex), and
through this the spores are finally emitted.
In Achlya the following processes occur. There appears in
1 This paper contains an excellent summary of the literature of the subject.
428 MARCUS M. HARTOG.
the protoplasm a network of lines, formed of fine granules, and
marking out the protoplasm into polygonal areas. These lines
broaden out, and become converted into clear bands, which
slowly swell up “like transitory cell plates.” This we may
term the first stage of preliminary division.
The second or homogeneous stage consists essentially in
the almost instantaneous disappearance of the clear bands ; the
protoplasm becomes lighter and homogeneous; the central
vacuole or vacuoles disappear at the same time that the basal
septum, hitherto concave towards the sporange, now bulges in
and becomes convex, showing that the turgescence of the
sporange has diminished. This stage hardly lasts more than
half a minute, and passes on to the
Third stage, that of the shifting vacuoles. The proto-
plasm loses its homogeneity owing to the appearance of a
number of minute vacuoles, some of which would seem to
occupy the centre of the meshes bounded by the network of
the first stage, others to lie along the lines bounding them.
These vacuoles come and go, fuse or disappear, and reappear.
This stage gradually passes into the next.
Fourth stage of finaldivision. Now, as the protoplasm
shrinks from the wall, leaving a clear space interpreted by
Biisgen and De Bary as a substance, new lines appear,
clearly marked and more numerous than in the preliminary
division. They are the optical expression of the planes
separating the zoospores, which now contract, round off, and
escape a little later.
These are the facts as described by Biisgen and Ward, and
as accepted by De Bary, their master, in his great work on
Fungi. In the above summary I have alluded to the fact that
Biisgen regards the lines of the preliminary division as rudi-
mentary cell plates. Ward explains them as nuclear plates.
Biisgen and De Bary seem to consider them to be the ultimate
source of the expulsive substance lining the sporangial wall in
the last stage, which, swelling in water, would determine the
expulsion of the zoospores: they deny the existence of the
flagella on the sporangial zoospore of Achlya as described by
ZOOSPORES IN THE SAPROLEGNIEA. 429
Cornu in his classical memoir, so that, for this genus, the exis-
tence of an expulsive matter would be essential to liberate the
zoospores. In Dictyuchus (genus), Saprolegnia, and
Leptomitus the processes and stages differ only in minor
details from the above.
In July, 1884, I had the opportunity of going over this
matter in Strasburg, under the direction of the same illustrious
botanist, Prof. A. De Bary, and with the kind help of Dr.
Biisgen. I had in hand a species of Saprolegnia which we
were unable to determine, as during the intense heat it formed
no sexual fruit. I anticipated nothing more than the confir-
mation of my predecessors’ results, but to my surprise I found
an undescribed phenomenon at the homogeneous stage. As
soon as it came on, a crowd of bacteria swarmed from all parts
to the neighbourhood of the sporange, and executed a vigorous
dance there till the conclusion of the stage, when they
dispersed. Inferring that some excretion must take place thus
to attract the bacteria, I put in the eye-piece micrometer, and
found indeed that the sporange narrowed greatly, by as much
as one seventh of its previous calibre. This unexpected
result set me thinking, and on my return to Cork I took up
the study afresh. Here I have only obtained two species:
Achlya polyandra, and a form with the constricted hyphz
of a Leptomitus, but which seemed to be identical with
Saprolegnia Thuretii,! sent to me recently by Prof. De
Bary’s kindness. Though these forms were convenient for
study and easily cultivated, they just failed to show the marked
contraction so interesting in the undetermined Saprolegnia.
I now proceed to describe the chief new points I have
made out.
In the Leptomitus form, and in starved sporanges of
Achlya, where a narrow layer of parietal protoplasm sur-
rounds an immense vacuole, it is easy to study the real signi-
‘ T now think [ must have contaminated my culture of S. Thuretii with
my Leptomitus form, which I hence regard as distinct, and define thus:
Saprolegnia corcagiensis (n. sp.), diplanetica, habitu, constrictionibus,
zoosporangiis que omnino Leptomiti lactei, polygama, oogoniis fenestratis.
430 MARCUS M. HARTOG.
ficance of the lines of preliminary division. They are the
optical expression of thinnings of this parietal layer
between prominences rounded towards the vacuole.
These prominences enlarge, and the protoplasm aggregates
more and more in them as they become nearly hemispherical ;
and the intermediate protoplasm becomes thinner and thinner,
so as to give the impression of clear spaces in surface view; but
in optical section it is easy to assure oneself that the proto-
plasm lining the sporange wall is everywhere continuous and
closely applied thereto. Careful focussing everywhere shows
the continuity of the clear bands and the vacuole. The
granules which first marked out the lines of demarcation in
Achlya do not disappear; they form a layer at the edge and
over the free surface of each hemispherical prominence, and
are seen as lines bounding it in plan and in optical section.
When the sporange of Achlya is normal the central vacuole
is replaced by several, owing to the abundance of protoplasm ;
and these in the first stage become converted into a continuous
system of lacune. The inner masses of protoplasm are all
connected by thinner bands.
In the narrower sporanges of Leptomitus there is no room
for a double row of prominences; hence in section they pro-
ject alternately, and the central vacuole becomes zigzag.
Here it is easy to see that the lines or bands of the preliminary
division are merely thinnings of the protoplasm.
In the undetermined Saprolegnia the central vacuole per-
sists, communicating, I think, with a lacunar system of spaces
in the thick parietal layer of protoplasm, which includes several
layers of prominences (or rather aggregations of protoplasm).
The homogeneous stage consists essentially in the swelling
up of the protoplasm and the loss of its resistance to
osmosis. On examining a normal sporange of Achlya, and
carefully focussing a lacuna with a high power (Zeiss E 4” for
instance), we see at the onset of this stage that the margins of
the lacuna advance and meet from the angles inwards until the
space disappears completely, much in the same way as the con-
1 As indeed figured by Biisgen (op. cit., T. xii, figs. 11, 12).
ZOOSPORES IN THE SAPROLEGNIEA. 431
tractile vacuole of an Amceba is seen to disappear. Inastarved
sporange the protoplasm contracts into a bossed gut-like mass
towards the centre of the sporange; for the cell wall is rather
thickened and rigid, so that it cannot present the contraction so
marked in the undetermined Saprolegnia and ina less degree
in the Leptomitus form (which, however, is usually too
narrow for easy measurements). I have tried to account for the
causes of this curious phenomenon, of which I have just given
the first complete description. It occurred to me that the
following was a possible explanation. The protoplasm is acted
upon in two ways: 1. The tendency of protoplasm to stick
together into a single mass. 2. The tendency to aggregate
around numerous centres (to form the prominences), aided by
the turgescence of the sporange. If then the thinning
at the intermediate bands went on to complete rupture at any
one point, the turgescence would be lost; so the first force
would overcome the second, now left unaided by the turgor
lost for the moment, and would thus lead to homogeneity ;
though the second force ultimately gain the upper hand in the
next and last stage. In this case loss of turgescence should
always bring on homogeneity. I tried to induce loss of
turgescence by De Vries’s method of plasnolysis with solutions
of cane sugar and of saltpetre. I found, however, that plasno-
lysis to a very considerable extent was not sufficient to induce
homogeneity. Hence the loss of turgescence must be a
concomitant or follower of homogeneity, and not its
cause. The explanation had seemed so simple that I was
much disappointed at having to give it up; but the facts were
too strong.
I then experimented with the aqueous solution of eosin,
which De Vries has shown does not diffuse readily through the
**Hautschicht” or external layer of protoplasm, nor its internal
layer, the “ vacuolar wall.” The protoplasm only stains readily
at the stage of homogeneity ; whence we may conclude that at
this stage the resistant layers do not exist, at least as continuous
layers. I think it probable that the Hautschicht and
vacuolar walls break up at this stage, and become re-
432 MARCUS M. HARTOG.
constituted later on, and that herein is the true essence of the
homogeneous stage.1 Probably, also, the stage of shifting
vacuoles is due to the reconstitution of these resistant layers.
As to the nuclei which exist in the first stage (of preliminary
division),? Biisgen adduces facts which make it probable that
nuclear multiplication takes place during the homogeneous
stage. The observation of the nuclei is extremely difficult,
and I am still seeking a satisfactory technique for the pursuit
and elucidation of this division of the subject.
Il. Tue Liseration or THE ZoosPores.
As already stated, the emission of the zoospores has been
ascribed by previous observers to the secretion of an expulsive
matter in the sporange, which swells up in the water to expel
them. Now, if such a substance existed it should be visible
by some difference of refrangibility or staining in the spo-
range or outside. But there is no matter lining the sporangial
wall that will stain in any reagent, or refract differently to
the water of the preparation. I have tried aniline dyes, he-
matoxylin, picrocarmine, before and after fixation by osmic
acid, picric acid, absolute alcohol, and obtained no sign of its
existence. There is no streakiness in the water (even on
staining) at the emptying of the sporange. In this case we
may fairly say, “ De non apparentibus et de non exsistentibus
eadem est ratio.” But if we follow the process of expulsion
fully and minutely, we shall be led to another explanation,
admissible as involving a vera causa: acceptable, as cover-
ing all the facts. To understand it we must review in detail
the processes of the definitive separation and emission of the
zoospores.
The protoplasm which hitherto filled the beak usually forms
1 I must here note that in Leptomitus the first lines of demarcation
never wholly disappear ; the homogeneity is never absolute.
? Whence Marshall Ward’s identification of the lines as nuclear plates is
inadmissible. His words are rather ambiguous, “ A phenomenon of nuclear
division in which the cell plate first formed becomes used up again” (I. c.,
p. 286).
ZOOSPORES OF THE SAPROLEGNIE®. 433
at least two zoospores, which, as they round off, become too
large for the calibre of the beak and retire from it. The end
wall ofthe beak, convex outwardly, is now seen in optic section
to be menisciform, thickened in the middle and thinning off at
the edges; and it presents that peculiar brilliant lustre which
is so characteristic of diffluent or collenchymatised cell walls.
And, indeed, it does shortly disappear, a phenomenon which De
Bary ascribes with great plausibility to the secretion of some
ferment. In some cases, especially in the undetermined
Saprolegnia, we may actually perceive the disappearance,
followed by the immediate outrush of the zoospores; but
usually in Achlya and Leptomitus the foremost zoospore
enters the beak, and closes up against its end wall, which, pos-
sessing the same refractive index, ceases to be distinguishable.
In this case the outrush ef the zoospores is the sole indication
of the dissolution of the end wall of the beak. As soon as the
way is clear, the zoospores crowd to the opening, closely serried,
leaving a clear space along the side wall of the sporange, and
giving at first sight the impression that they are indeed pushed
by such a vis a latere as the expulsive matter of De Bary
wouldexert. They force their way through the opening, often
becoming constricted as they do so, and emerge obtusely pyri-
form or of a stumpy “ biscuit shape,” with the anterior end the
narrower, and possessing two flagella (tractella). The hinder
ones in the sporange, as room is made for them, also lose their
rounded or polygonal form, and assume this. In Achlya, as
the zoospores emerge, they remain near the entrance, grouped
in a hollow sphere, their narrower rounded ends turned in
towards the centre. Hach new comer presses in between the
others, so that the sphere grows in size till the zoospores have
all settled there.
The outrush of the spores, so rapid at first, is seen to slacken
after some time, and then we can note more readily the real
mode of procedure. A man up in a balloon, observing a crowd
at the doors of a theatre, might well regard the inrush of sight-
seers when the doors open as the expression of a vis a4 tergo;
but he can correct his judgment by observing the behaviour of
434 MARCUS M. HARTOG.
the isolated later arrivals. We may often see in the half-
emptied sporange a file of say eight or ten equidistant zoospores
going towards the opening ; the hinder ones move leisurely
enough, keeping their distance; the front ones quicken up their
motion and lengthen their distance as they get to the mouth,
and leave it with a run, like a late arrival when he is stimulated
by coming in sight of the theatre. At length, when there are
but two or three left in the sporange, they may be seen to move
to and fro leisurely, as if careless of any goal, till when they
happen as it were to get towards the apex ; then they too quicken
speed and go out, but less fast than in the earlier stages of
emission, and so finally leave the sporange empty. Only when
the water is not well aerated a number of zoospores may remain
inside.
We now turn to those that have left the sporange in
Achlya, grouped in a sphere outside. Each revolves on its
long axis for a short time, then goes to rest, rounds off and
becomes encysted in a cellulose wall, closely united with its
neighbours. Sometimes, however, a few zoospores of Achlya
may escape from the sphere and swim off a short distance to
turn on themselves for a short time (sometimes becoming
amceboid), round off, and encyst quite isolated. As these
motions clearly indicated a motor organ, I used the usual reagent
for cilia and flagella, iodine solution, which at once demonstrated
the flagella in the moving zoospores, inside or outside the spo-
range, as seen by Cornu and denied by Busgen and De Bary.1
1 Cornu’s words are most explicit. “ Le trait d’union entre les Sapro-
legnia et les Achlyaa cependant échappé jusqu’ici a tous les botanistes.
“Les zoospores sont de deux sortes, comme chez les Saprolegnia
[italicised in the original]. Les premiéres, au lieu de se mouvoir pendant
plusieurs minutes ont juste assez d’agilite pour gagner Vouverture du
sporange ; elles sont munies de deux cils antérieures, visibles dans les condi-
tions favorables. Elles adhérent les unes aux autres en général par le moyen
de ces cils. . . . Au bout de ce temps [three or four hours] elles présen-
tent, soit le premier mode de germination, qui consiste a s’allonger en
filaments, soit le deuxiéme, et émettent alors des zoospores de deuxiéme
nature” (‘Monographie des Saprolegniées,’ p. 11).
In the face of this clear and detailed statement by so trustworthy an inves-
ZOOSPORES IN THE SAPROLEGNIEA. 435
In Leptomitus and Saprolegnia the flagella are easily
seen even in the sporange. In these forms the zoospores,
instead of assembling in a hollow sphere at the mouth of the
sporange, swim away freely in all directions for a few minutes,
and then encyst after the fashion described for Achlya. In
all these genera the cyst opens after a few hours and the
zoospore leaves in a different form, kidney shaped, with two
flagella diverging from the notch, one anterior (tractellum) and
one posterior (pulsellum). This phenomenon of two distinct
mobile conditions to the zoospore separated by an interval of
rest, has received the name of Diplanetism. It is obvious
that Achlya is also diplanetic.
We have now to consider the full explanation of the outrush,
which study has already led us to regard as really due to
a vis a fronte, an attraction outside the sporange. No
expulsive matter could produce the exit of the last few zoo-
spores nor effect the acceleration of their movement near their
mouth. Now, Engelmann and Pfeffer have by their brilliant
researches familiarised us with the action of chemical
stimuli. The swarming of the bacteria at one stage, evidently
due to such a stimulus, led me to undertake this research, and
I must invoke the theory again at this point. Saprolegniez ~
are among the most aerobic of plants; their culture only suc-
ceeds when the water in which they grow is kept constantly
oxygenated. When the oxygen is used up, the hyphe and
young sporanges become deformed; the mature sporanges
open by the disappearance of the end wall of the
beak; but the zoospores remain inside; they encyst there
and form the so-called “ Dictyuchus state,” which never
occurs in well aerated cultures of the above three genera.
It is obvious then that oxygen dissolved in the ambiant
water exercises the stimulus which is the true source of the
liberation of the zoospores. That such a stimulus is sufficient
to account for the squeezing out is obvious from the observation
tigator, it is astonishing that such excellent observers should have denied the
existence of the flagella, without exhausting every means of ascertaining if
they were there.
436 MARCUS M. HARTOG.
of Juranyi, cited elsewhere by Marshall Ward, that in Gidogo-
nium the “ relatively large antherozooid forces its way through
an aperture too small for it to reach the attracting oosphere.”
The exit is so rapid at first because of the contrast between
the external medium and the small amount of liquid within
the sporange, vitiated by the close-packed thousands ofzoospores,
and with its gases slowly changed through the sporangial wall,
and because of the immense number of zoospores, all influenced
at once by the stimulus. Later on the contrast is lessened,
partly by the exit of so many zoospores, partly by the influx of
aerated water from without to occupy the room left by their
exit. Only near the very mouth of the sporange is the contrast
marked enough to accelerate the pace of the foremost zoospores.
But when the water is left unaerated there is no difference
as regards oxygenation between the inside of the sporange and
the surroundings; the beak may open, but the zoospores,
feeling no attraction to without, stay where they are, and the
Dictyuchus state is produced; or, if the aeration be imperfect,
only some of the zoospores leave the sporange till those within
are no longer attracted and remain inside.
Finally, we may note that this is only one instance of the
extraordinary susceptibility of this group to chemical stimuli.
Others are well known, such as the growth of the hyphe of
germinating zoospores (especially in the Dictyuchus condi-
tion) towards food material, the germination of the oospores
only in presence of food material, the growth of the
antheridial branches towards the oogonium, &c:
The following is an abstract of the chief points I claim to
have established :
1. The clear bands of the first stage of the zoosporange are
neither cell plates nor nuclear plates, but thinner parts of the
protoplasm due to the aggregation of the greater part thereof
around distinct centres.
2. At the homogeneous stage the protoplasm acquires an
extreme perviousness to liquid; this is probably due to the
temporary loss of the resistant layers (Hautschicht, vacuolar
walls) as continuous layers.
ZOOSPORES IN THE SAPROLEGNIEZ. 437
3. The homogeneous stage is accompanied by a loss of
turgescence, and in many cases by a marked contraction of the
sporange.
4, The clear spaces seen in the final separation are merely
the watery liquid of the sporange between the contracting z0o-
spores, and do not represent expulsive matter. Nosuch expul-
sive matter exists.
5. The sporangial zoospores of Achlya possess at their
exit the two tractella described by Cornu, just like those of
Saprolegnia and Leptomitus. Achlya is therefore dipla-
netic.
6. The escape of the zoospores is not due to any such expul-
sive matter as has been assumed, but to the chemical stimulus
of the oxygen in the medium acting on the auto-motile zoo-
spores.
It would seem probable that the escape of the protoplasm
from gonidia of so many Peronosporez (Phytophthora and the
plasmatoparous Peronospore, for instance) is due to the same
chemical stimulus of well-aerated water. There is no evidence
for the existence of an expulsive matter in the sporange or spore
of any aquatic fungus. Sporangial walls being diffusible to
water and gases it is obvious that the conditions of the constantly
immersed sporange are totally different from those of the aerial
ascus of the higher fungi, where such a material does certainly
exist.
The above observations were chiefly made on plants grown on
mealworms in tumblers, and floated out on large glass slides for
observation, seldom covered, and replaced in the tumblers after-
wards. In some cases I have used small cultures in the hanging
drop with the cardboard or blotting-paper moist chamber.
P.S.—A suggestion as to the physiological value and
the filiation of diplanetism, &c., may not be out of place. The
zoospore on leaving the sporange has enough reserve material
to carry it a certain distance, and to enable it to germinate.
In the first swarming the zoospores get scattered; and then
during the long stage of encystment the further work of dis-
VOL, XXVII, PART 3,——-NEW SER. HH
438 MARCUS M. HARTOG.
semination is effected by the movements of the water at no
cost to the organism. And we must bear in mind that a con-
siderable amount of dissemination is needed, lest the zoospores
should be uselessly attracted to the host on which their parent
thallus is living. .
In Achlya the limited first swarming forms a sort of
zlobular colony of resting spores, easily broken away as a
whole by a slight impact, as of a dead animal floating down
stream. The swarmers when liberated form a host of invaders
effecting rapid and complete infection, which isolated ones
might fail to do.
In Dictyuchus (gen.) the resting state of Achlya is
reached without the expenditure of energy required to swim
to the outlet of the sporange. A further economy is thus
effected.
The Termination of Nerves in the Liver.
By
A. B. Macallum, B.A.,
Fellow of University College, Toronto, Canada.
With Plate XXXIII, figs, 1 to 6.
oe
Artrr the completion of my studies on the termination of
nerves in the cutaneous epithelium of the tadpole, I began
investigations on the distribution and arrangement of nerves in
other organs, and have now arrived at what I consider important
results, more especially in the case of liver. That of man was
first employed at the outset of the investigation, but I soon
perceived that on account of the small size of the cells here I
would have to resort to some other Vertebrate for control pur-
poses ; not that the liver of man does not yield definite results,
but that these might always be open to doubt if taken alone.
Fortunately at that time there were a number of Necturi in
the Laboratory Aquarium, and to these I resorted, on the advice
of Professor Wright, obtaining from them my most valuable
preparations of the liver. The hepatic cells in these are from
two to four times in diameter those in man. It is obvious,
therefore, that for ascertaining the relations of nerves to the
hepatic cells the liver of Necturus (=Menobranchus) is the
most favorable that can be at the disposal of any histologist.
I made preparations also from the livers of the dog, rabbit,
and frog, which turned out to be of but indifferent value, and
recognising that the narrower the field of investigation is the
more could attention be bestowed on the necessary details of
technical manipulation and of observation, I devoted nearly the
whole of my time to winning successful results from the livers
VOL, XXVII, PART 4.—NEW SER. Kt
4.40 A. B. MACALLUM.
of man and Necturus. There is besides another justification
for narrowing the range of the work as I have done, namely, that
one of the highest and one of the lowest Vertebrate types are
embraced in the investigation. I do not wish to be understood
as believing that the results which I here advance are typical
of every Vertebrate liver. Indeed, the following pages show a
not very close agreement of results from the two types, and it
would be hazardous to say which presents the form of nerve
termination which has the most general occurrence in other
Vertebrate livers.
I may be allowed to insist on one point about which the
vaguest opinions are allowed to pass currently as correct: the
hepatic cell and nerve-tissue are in close connection, not
merely by contact, but by actual union.
The literature on this subject, what little there is, is full of
contradictions or negative statements. Pfliiger, the first
observer in this line, came to definite conclusions, itis true, but
although experimental physiology has partially confirmed his
view, taken as a whole and not in detail, yet the workers since
that time who have published descriptions of their researches on
the nerves of the liver have found no such connection between
these and the hepatic cells as he describes, or, in fact, none at
all. The reason for these contradictory results partly is that
in nearly every case the researches were based on the Mamma-
lian liver, the cellular constituents of which are too small to
admit of definitely deciding so difficult a question.
I proceed now to give a résumé of the literature on the sub-
ject, coupled with a description of the methods employed in each
case. A reference to these methods is necessary in order that
I may briefly outline their advantages and disadvantages.
Pfliiger! used osmic acid to determine the course of the
nerves. He found them rarely single, often in bundles, each
single fibre dividing frequently and anastomosing, and finally
penetrating the membrane of the liver-cells in order to termi-
nate in the latter. The fibres retain their myeline investment
up to the point of penetrating the cell. The fibres in the
1 «Archiv fiir die ges. Physiologie,’ ii, 1869, also 1871.
TERMINATION OF NERVES IN THE LIVER. 441
interior of the cell terminate in a series of fine fibrils with
regularly placed granules or swellings along the course of each.
Hering! found a rich supply of nerve-fibres entering the
portal canal and branching with the vessels running in Glisson’s
capsule. Only a few were medullated, the finest bundles con-
taining only non-medullated fibrils. Hering was unable to
trace any nerves into the hepatic lobules.
Nesterowsky” injected the vessels of the cat and dog with
coloured glue, and left sections of the organ so treated in a 4
per cent. solution of gold chloride for twenty to twenty-five
minutes, after which he put them in a weak solution of glyce-
rine acidified with acetic acid, till they took a violet colour,
which usually happened in five to fifteen days. In some cases
he added a little of a solution of ammonium sulphide in order
to bring out the nerves more prominently. He found branches
of the portal vein surrounded by a plexus of coarse and fine
nerve-fibres. Out of the coarser plexus arise fine anastomosing
fibres, forming loops; they enter the lobules and closely twine
about the blood-capillaries. Nesterowsky never observed even
a connection between these nerve-fibres and the hepatic cells.
He could not determine whether the nerves were medullated or
not, although he thought he saw in one case examples of the
former.
Kupffer® followed Nesterowsky’s methods, and came to the
conclusion that the fibres considered by the latter as nerves are
simply those of connective tissue. He treated sections of the
liver obtained by means of a Valentine knife with weak chromic
acid solution (0°05 per cent.) and then left them for several
days ina 0:01 per cent. solution of gold chloride, when they
attained a red or violet colour. By means of this method he
demonstrated the so-called ‘stellate cells,’ and at the same
time found that the tissues immediately about the central vein
of the lobule acquired a violet tint, a fact which indicated, he
first thought, the presence of nerve-fibres, but he afterwards
‘ Stricker’s Handbuch,’ p. 452, Leipzig, 1871.
1
2 « Ueber die Nerven der Leber,” ‘ Virchow’s Archiv,’ Bd. 63, p. 412, 1875.
3 “ Ueber Sternzellen der Leber,” £ Arch. fiir Mikr. Anat.,’ Bd, xii, p. 353.
442, A. B. MACALLUM.
considered the structures in question to belong to connective
tissue, since they acted towards a solution of nickel oxide in
ammonia like the latter, and as he found the same sort of fibrils
directly entering the lobules from the hepatic serosa.
Kolatschewsky! used two methods. In one, fine sections of
the liver were pencilled out and treated for ten to twenty
minutes with }—1 per cent. solution of gold chloride; these,
put in water acidified with acetic acid, were left there for one or
two weeks exposed to the light until they became coloured rose
violet. According to the other method, sections of liver hardened
with ,—;4, per cent. solution of ammonium bichromate were
pencilled out and placed in a solution of the double chloride of
gold and sodium of the strength recommended by Gerlach.
The reduction is accomplished as in the first method. By these
methods he found deeply coloured fibres running in the interlobu-
lar spaces and entwining ultimately about the capillaries of the
lobules. Some of the fibrils end in the nuclei on the capillary
walls. The fibres branch, enter into the depth of the lobules,
and form there plexuses of fibrils running parallel to and around
the vascular channels. The smaller the capillaries the narrower
are the meshes of the plexus. Kolatschewsky was not certain
that these fibres are nerves, and he never saw their connection
with the hepatic cells, if such occurred. His results agree in
the main with those of Nesterowsky.
Holbrook? made sections of the fresh liver when it was frozen,
which he left in a 3 per cent. solution of gold chloride for thirty
to forty minutes. The reduction of the gold was accomplished
with formic acid. In some cases he hardened the tissue first
of all with chromic acid, and then used the foregoing method.
He found the nerves in the portal canal provided with a large
number of nuclei and occurring usually in bundles of from
three to five fibres, which enter the lobules and branch at acute
angles along the capillary channels. The finest nerve-fibrille
1 « Beitrage zur Histologie der Leber,” ‘Arch. fiir Mikr. Anat.,’ Bd. xiii,
p- 415.
9
2 «The Termination of Nerves in the Liver,” ‘ Proceedings American So-
ciety of Microscopists,’ p. 95, 1882.
TERMINATION OF NERVES IN THE LIVER. 443
are found running around the capillaries between these and the
hepatic cells. They touch, pass between, but do not enter the
latter as Pfliger maintains. Holbrook asserts that the fibrils
are connected with the cement substance or protoplasmic bridges
between the cells, and thereby with the outer portion of the cell
reticulum. He also corroborates the results of Nesterowsky’s
researches.
Meruops.
To demonstrate nerve-structures in the liver of Necturus
the method employed was as follows: Pieces of the liver were
hardened for a week or more in Erlicki’s fluid, or for several
days in a +—+ per cent. solution of chromic acid. After the
hardening was sufficiently completed in alcohol, sections of the
frozen tissue were made with a Cathcart microtome. These,
when the gum was carefully removed, were put in a weak solu-
tion of formic acid (5 per cent.) for an hour, transferred to a
1 per cent. solution of gold chloride for about twenty minutes,
then washed in distilled water, and the gold afterwards reduced
in the dark with a 10 per cent. solution of formic acid. About
thirty hours sufficed for this reduction when the temperature of
the room was 20° C. The sections then had a deep red colour,
but sometimes the tinge was violet. The chromatine of the
nuclei of the hepatic cells took a deep blue violet tint, the
caryoplasma light violet, while the cytoplasma came out very
distinct as a meshwork with a pink or light carmine colour,
The nerve-fibres appeared deep violet, but the connective tissue
of the interlobular spaces attained a light red, sometimes a
deep red colour,
When chromic acid was used as a hardening reagent the
addition of any organic acid at the same time, such as acetic
acid more especially, seemed to me to have the effect of robbing
the nerve-fibres of their selective capacity for gold, while it
increased the effect of the latter on the remaining constituents
of the liver.
I do not know whether chromic acid or Erlicki’s fluid offers
in the method described more advantages. If there is any
advantage at all it is to be obtained from the former reagent,
AAA A. B. MACALLUM.
as with it one is apt to get beautiful preparations of the liver in
which the gall-capillaries, gall-ducts, blood-capillaries, the
nerves, and the elements of the hepatic cells and their nuclei
are demonstrated in a way that I have found equalled by no
other method of manipulation. The value of chromic acid and
gold chloride in this respect I shall refer to again in a subse-
quent paper.
Sections of the liver of Necturus are not of any value when
they are of less than 0:020 m. in thickness, that being less than
half the average diameter of the hepatic cell.
In the case of the human liver chromic acid was the only
reagent used in hardening. The sections were made with the
paraffin method, and were subsequently treated in the manner
already outlined. I found that uniformly thick or uniformly
thin sections did not answer well, for in these either but short
pieces of nerve-fibres or fibrils could be seen, or else they were
obscured by the thickness of the section. I managed to obtain
sections about half an inch square, which had a thickness at
one edge two to three times greater than at the opposite one,
so that the thickness decreased gradually from one edge to the
other. With these sections I was able to see and follow a fibre
in its full extent, together with its divisions or branchlets, and
thereby gained all the advantages of a thick and a thin section,
with the faults of neither so far as tracing the nerves is con-
cerned.
The success of the preparations of the human liver was the
exception and not the rule. About 10 per cent. or at most
20 per cent. of them only were valuable for all the purposes for
which I made them. Sections from the same piece of liver,
when treated under exactly like conditions but in different
dishes, proved to be not equally successful, some being indif-
ferent or worthless. Why this is I do not know. In the case
of a very strong colouring with the gold so much as to obscure
the structure, I used a } per cent. solution of potassic cyanide
as recommended by Cybulsky.! By putting the over-stained
tion in this solution the proper depth of colour is obtained
1 «Zeit. fir wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. 39, 8. 657.
TERMINATION. OF NERVES, IN THE LIVER. ALS
by the solution of the excess of the fixed gold, this process of
course being carefully watched. In this reagent one finds an
additional advantage; the nerve-fibres are the last to part
with the violet colour, thus being distinguished from connec-
tive-tissue fibres. It, however, does not always operate in the
latter way satisfactorily.
The sections of the human liver received from the gold a dull
violet or a dull red tint, while in other preparations a blue violet
tint was found. In two cases I obtained preparations which to
the eye appeared almost colourless, but which on examination
demonstrated the nerve-fibres very distinctly.
All the sections were cleared in oil of cloves, and mounted in
balsam.
In the study of the ultimate terminations of the nerves I
have used the Leitz ;4, inch homogeneous immersion with special
illumination. In the human liver, more especially, it was
impossible to do anything with a less efficient objective. In
the Necturus liver it was quite easy, however, to see the
required structures with a system 7 of Leitz, but I have
endeavoured in every case to verify my observations with the
higher power objective.
The value of gold chloride as a reagent for differentiating
nerves is not admitted by all histologists. It has been urged
also that the elements it selects in a fresh tissue and those it
differentiates in a tissue hardened by a reagent such as chromic
acid are not necessarily the same structures. This objection
has a great deal of force, especially in view of the fact that gold
chloride gives a violet tint to connective tissue which has been
first hardened with chromic acid ; the corium of Necturus and
the connective tissue around arteries are casesin point, More-
over, the tendency of a hardened tissue is to reduce equally the
gold so as to give to all the tissue elements a violet colour. Yet
with all its faults the method of hardening with chromic acid
and the subsequent treatment with gold chloride has many
advantages over other micro-chemical and staining reagents,
and so far as the demonstration by it of nerve-structures
are concerned no greater suspicion should be attached to results
446 A. B. MACCALLUM.
obtained with it than to those of other histo-chemical reagents.
Gold chloride employed in any way is not an infallible test for
nerve-structures, for these have in the end to be determined by
their intrinsic form and arrangement, by their origin and
termination, or either separately. The violet colour given by
gold chloride to fibres otherwise undemonstrable is therefore of
accessory value only.
It is not known definitely to what organic compound is due
the capacity of nerve-fibres for fixing in themselves gold chloride.
R. Gscheidlen,! after a series of experiments, came to the
conclusion that the reduction is caused by a fatty substance.
He treated pieces of the ischiadic nerve of a frog with ether,
alcohol, and water respectively, and found that the extract
obtained with ether reduces gold in a few hours, while that
obtained with alcohol took longer to do the same, the aqueous
extract, on the other hand, a very long time. As 90 per cent.
of the solid extract obtained with ether is fatty in its nature
Gscheidlen drew the inference that a constituent of this fat
reduces the gold. I do not think that this explanation will
suffice, for nearly all the fat of such an extract must come from
the myeline investment of the fibres, and we find that no
reduction usually occurs in the medulla. Fol? points out that
the violet colour may have another explanation than a mere
reduction of the gold, and calls attention to the fact demon-
strated by Lindet that this reagent forms double salts with
phosphorus compounds, especially the chlorides, which give
aqueous solutions of a violet colour. Whether gold chloride
undergoes reduction or enters into a more complicated condition
it is outside the province of the histologist to determine. It is
possible, however, without transgressing limits, to consider some
aspects of this question and to suggest some points which may
help in the solution It seems to me that the substance which
favours the production of a violet colour with gold chloride is
diffused through all forms of tissue, and that it is found in a
concentrated condition in nerve-tissue only. If a section of
1 ¢ Arch, fiir Mikr. Anat.,’ Bd. xiv, p. 225.
* «Tehrbuch der Vergleichenden Microscopischen Anatomie,’ p. 175.
TERMINATION OF NERVES IN THE LIVER, 44,7
liver be treated with gold chloride, and the process of colouration
be watched, it will be found that the first tinge which the
nerve-fibres take is red, and afterwards they show all stages
transitional between that colour and violet, while the other
systems of tissue slowly pass through the same order of colours
to the violet tint. The nuclear chromatine is an exception,
being, like nerve-tissue, quick to attain a violet tint. Occa-
sionally other structures act like nerve-fibres towards gold, and
among these may be mentioned certain paranuclear bodies in
the cutaneous epithelium of Necturus which are first coloured
red, then rose violet, and finally deep violet. This appears to
show that the substance which fixes the gold in a violet form
is not confined to nerves, but is diffused to a small degree in
other tissue elements.
The finest nerve-fibrils being hardly thicker or less delicate
than the trabeculz of the cytoplasma, it is wrong to suppose
that a reagent which does not specially preserve and fix the
latter will do this for the former. It is in this respect that I
find the reason for the failure of Nesterowsky, Kolatschewsky,
and others to resolve the finer nerve terminations, seeing that
the reagents they used for hardening the tissue do not render
the cytoplasma distinct and firm, and with it the finer nerve-
fibrils. Ammonium bichromate is not a suitable reagent for
this purpose, neither is the weak solution of chromic acid such
as Kupffer used. The same objection can be urged against the
method of freezing the fresh liver in order to obtain sections.
The method of gold colouration must not be allowed to injure
the cytoplasma. The test which I always exacted of the
method employed was the distinct demonstration of the cell
reticulum; that being in a good state of preservation, it was
only a question of the number of trials with gold chloride in
order to get the desired demonstration of the termination of
the finest fibrils. I think also that the clearing up of fresh
tissue with formic or acetic acid previous to steeping in goid
chloride is apt to destroy both the cytoplasma and the finest
nerve-fibrils. It is on this ground that I advocate the use of
chromic acid to fix these before subjecting them to the action
448 A. B. MACALLUM.
of gold chloride, and to the subsequent treatment with formic
or acetic acids. Osmic acid, although useful in the case of
medullated nerve-fibres, is of no value for demonstrating the
finest non-medullated fibrils.
Here a few words are necessary concerning the structure of
the cytoplasma. In figs. 3, 4, 5, 6 it is represented as a net-
work with thickened nodal points. It must be admitted that
it does not always appear in such a regular arrangement. The
meshes are often much larger and round as if occupied by fat
droplets. Often also the trabeculz thin out toward the peri-
phery of the cell, so as to be nearly indistinguishable. The
specimens of Necturus from which these preparations were
made were caught early in March, 1885, and consequently
there was but a small amount of fat in the hepatic cells. The
appearance presented in the figures is a normal one, for
chromic acid material with hematoxylin or aniline dyes show a
similar arrangement. Flemming! believes in the arrangement
of the cytoplasma in threads throughout the cell, but doubts if
these form a network such as Klein? describes. Structures,
however, like those drawn in figs. 5 and 6, leave hardly any
doubt as to the occurrence of a reticulum.
Tur NERVES oF THE Human Liver.
In sections of the liver treated successfully with gold chloride
the tissues immediately about the interlobular and central
veins take a rose-violet or blue-violet colour. These strongly
coloured fields, observed with a low-power objective, seem to
consist wholly of violet-coloured fibres, but when more highly
magnified the latter, which are commonly arranged in bundles,
are seen to constitute but a small part of the interlobular
tissue, or of that about the central vein, there being between
the bundles a quantity of connective tissue coloured light violet
orred. The thickest fibres are of about 0:0035 mm. in diameter.
Each bundle is composed of a varying number of fibres, and is
1 « Zellsubstanz, Kern, und Zelltheilung,’ Leipzig, 1882, p. 28.
2 “ Observations on the Structure of Cells and Nuclei,” this Journal, vol.
Xviil.
TERMINATION OF NERVES IN THE LIVER. 449
usually separated from its neighbour by a narrow interspace
less in diameter than that of the bundle. The fibres when
seen in transverse section are round, and possess nuclei which
are closely applied, sometimes at definite intervals. The fibres
are wavy in their course, and are clear and homogeneous. They
branch frequently, the branches being of diminished size,
round, and lacking the nuclei of the larger trunks. They
appear in no way to be related to or derived from connective-
tissue corpuscles, they do not anastomose with one another,
and they nearly always have a parallel direction, decreasing in
size as they pass into the smaller divisions of the interlobular
canal, where their arrangement in bundles is not so common.
The violet colour of the fibres render them remarkably
distinct in contrast with the rose-violet connective tissue in
which they lie scattered. Sometimes, however, the connective
tissue is not coloured at all, but comes out as a granulo-
fibrillar appearance which is apt to be overlooked in the
presence of the deeply coloured fibres. In these cases the
bundles are separated by the granulo-fibrillar substances which
penetrates much less prominently between the individual
fibres.
Where connective tissue and nerve-fibres are coloured alike,
it is useful to differentiate between the two with the aid of a
weak solution of potassic cyanide. The section being placed
on the slide a drop or two of this reagent is added to it and
the decolouration watched with a moderately high power.
When the interlobular tissue is deprived of its colour to the
degree required the section is mounted in the usual way.
Under the high power one now finds only a portion of the
interlobular tissue retains its violet tint, and this portion is
composed of the fibres above referred to. This does not neces-
sarily show that the fibres so revealed are nerve-fibres, or
definitely distinguish them from those of connective tissue.
It, however, seems to agree with the experience of Cybulsky,
that in tissue stained with gold chloride, and subsequently
treated with potassic cyanide, the nerve-fibres retain their
colour longest.
450 A. B. MACALLUM.
I have never seen the connection of these fibres with medul-
lated nerves, having never found the latter in the liver, but the
normal or abnormal occurrence of which in the interlobular
canals I do not doubt. Medullated nerve-fibres are sometimes
found in unusual places. For example, Cybulsky found a
medullated nerve-fibre penetrating the cutaneous epithelium,
and I also have seen the same thing in a preparation of epithe-
lioma. One may be inclined to believe, therefore, that medul-
lated nerve-fibres can and do occur in the liver. It is to be
remembered too that gold chloride is not a good reagent for
demonstrating the myeline investment of nerves, the occur-
rence of which may escape the eye in preparations obtained
with the one method.
It is quite true, as Kupffer asserts, that in gold preparations
violet-coloured tissue passes at places in from the serous
covering of the liver between the hepatic cylinders. I gather
from his statements that he supposes that no nerves can reach
the hepatic tissue in this way. Such a supposition is ground-
less, seeing that the serosa and the interlobular tissue are of
one and the same origin, and one is as likely as the other to
contain nerve-fibres. Where in my preparations the serosa
was coloured violet throughout I added a drop of the solu-
tion of potassic cyanide, and found, in consequence the same
to be true here which I have described for the interlobular
canals, namely, the presence of the two types of tissue—
nerve and connective, the latter, however, very largely pre-
dominating.
There are at times interspersed between the bundles of large,
violet-coloured fibres, fibrils in which the violet colour is not
so distinct, and is more readily removable with potassic cyanide
than that of the large fibres, but less so than that of connective
tissue. I am doubtful of the significance of these, but they
apparently answer to the smaller nerve-fibres of Nesterowsky.
I have had no means of determining their connection with the
larger fibres.
Around the central vein of a lobule both the connective and
the nerve-tissue are in small quantity. The nerve-tissue is
TERMINATION OF NERVES IN THE LIVER. 451
found absent frequently in otherwise successful preparations,
aud the fibres usually are not more than half a dozen, each
separated from the other by a considerable interval of space.
For tracing the nerve-fibres further to their termination it is
necessary to resort to the special sections which I have referred
to, namely, those which decrease in thickness from one edge to
the opposite one. Ina section of this sort, if the thick edge
includes a longitudinal view of one of the interlobular canals,
every facility is thereby afforded for following these fibres.
intermediate in character as well as in position, between the
ectodermal and endodermal nuclei. The multiplication of these
nuclei gives rise to a primitive streak, which, as in the Verte-
brata, is entirely posterior to the blastopore, and is marked by
a longitudinal groove—the primitive groove.
This process resembles, in all essential points, the formation
of the greater part of the mesoderm in other Tracheata from
the walls of the germinal groove, differing only in this, that
whereas in the latter the germinal or primitive streak occupies
the greater part of the ventral surface, in Peripatus it is
confined to the part of the ventral surface behind the anus.
I have elsewhere (No. 32) stated my reasons for agreement
with Balfour’s view, viz. that such a method of mesoderm
formation is probably to be regarded as a modification of
archenteric diverticula, such as are found in Amphioxus, &c.
Whether the origin of mesoderm from the walls of archenteric
diverticula is a primitive process or not is open to grave
doubt.
It seems to me there is a large body of embryological facts
which suggest, at any rate, the view that the mesoderm arose
as a result of the differentiation and rearrangement of certain
of the nuclei of the amceboid central mass of the ancestral
parenchymella or gastrula; that is to say, the facts seem
to suggest the following as a possible general view of the origin
of the three layers of the Triploblastica.
(a) Starting with a large multinucleated Protozoon, the
first advance consists in the differentiation of a cortical layer
of nuclei and of the protoplasm governed by them into a
peripheral layer or ectoderm. This layer was possibly of
a plastic nature, and allowed the protrusion of the central
mass at one or more points. The central mass would, in
consequence of its large size, probably be capable of arrang-
ing its vacuoles into a series of thoroughfares through itself
from one opening on the surface to another, so that the intro-
duction of nutritive matters to its deeper parts would be possible.
On the analogy of the Platyhelminth excretory system we may
532 ADAM SEDGWICK.
imagine that the protoplasm of these tracts would acquire the
property of throwing out vibratile processes into this system of
channels for the purpose of assisting in an effective circulation
of the external medium through the body. Such an animal
would consist, then, of an ectoderm and a central multinucleate
mass which, with Metschnikoff, we may call the meso-endoderm.
(6) The next change would consist in the differentiation of
the nuclei of the meso-endodermic mass into two kinds:
(a) those governing the protoplasm lining the differentiated
vacuoles ; and (4) the remainder, which would gradually dif-
ferentiate into various kinds as evolution progressed. The
differentiation of the protoplasm around the nuclei would
proceed hand in hand with that of the nuclei; the result
being a gradually increasing complexity in the tissues of the
animal.
The result would be, if the canal system remained complex,
—a sponge; if, on the other hand, the canal system simplified
and preserved only one opening, the ancestor of the other
Metazoa.
It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss the evolution
of the mesoderm. I merely throw this out as a suggestion,
which is supported by the manner and order of development
of the layers in many animals (a peeling off, so to speak, from
the ovum: (1) of ectoderm; (2) of mesoderm; (3) leaving
the endoderm as the remaining central mass), and as a com-
pletion of the scheme which I have put forward in discuss-
ing the manner of passage from the Protozoa to the
Metazoa. ,
Finally, I would desire to draw attention to the fact (1) that
the formation of mesoderm in Peripatus is essentially a forma-
tion of nuclei, which pass to their respective positions and
arrange themselves in the protoplasmic reticulum there present;
and (2) that the primitive streak is the growing point of the
animal, from which almost all the tissues of the body of the
adult, viz. ectoderm, endoderm, and mesoderm are formed.
This is an important point, to which sufficient attention has
not been directed. Almost the whole of the embryo, behind
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 538
the fifth or sixth somite—not merely the mesoderm, but all
the layers—derives its nuclei from the primitive streak. The
primitive streak nuelei are therefore not merely mesodermal,
but ectodermal and endodermal as well.
3. The last feature in the development of Peripatus
capensis which I would desire to notice in its general bear-
ings, is the development of the body cavity and the fate of
the cclom.
The coelom, as is well known, is the term applied to a body
cavity with certain characters—characters which may be
summed up in the following terms :—(1) The coelom does not
communicate with the vascular system; (2) it communicates
with the exterior by nephridial pores ; (3) its lining gives rise
to the generative products; (4) it develops either as one or
more diverticula from the primitive enteron, or as a space or
spaces in the unsegmented or segmented mesoblastic bands (in
the latter case called mesoblastic somites).
The vascular space has none of these characters, and is
known as a pseudoceelic space: it develops either from the
blastocele or from asystem of channels hollowed out in the
mesodermic tissue of the body. In the Annelida and Ver-
tebrata these two spaces co-exist, and present a well-marked
contrast to one another; while in the two other great groups
of the animal kingdom—the Mollusca and Arthropoda—
the relations of the two systems has not been thoroughly
understood. We will first consider the case of the Arthro-
poda.
The body cavity in the Arthropoda has generally been
regarded as ccelomic, in spite of the fact that it presents none
of the ordinary celomic characters. It communicates with the
vascular system, it does not open to the exterior by nephridial
pores, its lining does not, so far as is known, develope the
generative cells, for the generative glands are continuous with
their ducts, and, so far asis known, have no connection with the
body cavity. Neither has the body cavity been traced into
connection with the undoubted ceelom of the embryo. In all
the groups of the Arthropoda mesoblastic somites with a more
534 ADAM SEDGWICK.
or less well-marked cavity are formed in the embryo; but the
fate of these structures has never been followed. We do not
know whether their cavities enlarge and unite with one another
and give rise to the body cavity and vascular system of the
adult, or whether they shrivel up and disappear, their walls
only remaining as part of the mesoderm. From what has
been said it is also clear that it is impossible to say whether in
the Arthropoda the vascular system is nipped off from the
coelom, or whether it arises as a separate set of spaces in the
mesoderm, as in Annelids and Vertebrates.
Now, Peripatus is a true Arthropod so far as its body
cavity is concerned: thus the heart drives the blood into
it, and by means of the paired cardiac ostia sucks the blood
out of it; it does not communicate with the exterior by nephri-
dial pores, nor does its lining develope generative cells. We
are therefore justified in regarding the body cavity of Peripatus
as homologous with that of other Arthropoda. It results
from this that the study of the development of the body
cavity in Peripatus, which can be traced with comparative
ease, must be of extreme interest, as tending to clear up the
question of its celomic or non-ccelomic nature in Arthropoda
generally.
Kennel was the first to trace the body cavity of Peripatus.
He showed that it was in part, at any rate, a pseudoceele, but
his work was incomplete in that he failed to follow correctly
the fate of the celom. He thought that the celom became
merged into the body cavity. If this were correct, it would
follow that in Peripatus the vascular system and ccelom would
be in communication.
As has been fully shown in the preceding pages, this is not
the case. The celom of Peripatus can be traced through the
whole development, as a system of spaces shut off at all stages
of its growth from the system of body-cavity spaces. In the
adult Peripatus the ccelom is in the following condition: (1) a
series of nephridia ending internally in small thin-walled
closed vesicles ; (2) two dorsal tubes—the generative glands
and the ducts of these, which latter are derived from one pair
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 539
of posterior somites. The pericardium, heart, whole of the
body cavity (central, lateral, and leg compartments) are exclu-
sively pseudoccelic in origin.
In Peripatus, therefore, the gonads are cclomic, and their
ducts what Lankester would call nephrodinic.
The condition of the body cavity and cceelom of Peripatus
will be best appreciated by comparing it with that of the same
organs in an Annelid, suchas Lumbricus. 1. In Lumbricus
the structures corresponding to the nephridial vesicles of
Peripatus have swollen up and united with one another in pairs
across the middle dorsal and ventral lines, and after some
time have become united with one another longitudinally,
though the separating walls between successive somites for the
most part persist ; they constitute the coelomic body cavity of
Lumbricus. 2. In Peripatus the vascular channels, excepting
the heart, are swollen out to wide channels, more or less
completely continuous with one another, so as to form four or
five main vascular tracts, while in Lumbricus they are present
as minute, branching, well-defined canals.
On comparing Peripatus with other Arthropodain this con-
nection we are at once met with these facts : (1) that in no other
Arthropod are nephridia, recognisable as such, present ; (2) that
the cavities of the somites cannot be traced beyond a compara-
tively early stage of development; (3) that the early stages of
the generative organs have not been thoroughly made out.
We may, however, with fair probability predict, from what
we know (1) of the development of Peripatus, and (2) of the
resemblance of its body cavity to that of other Arthropods,
that when the development of the latter has been fully worked
out it will be found that the ccelom of the embryo persists as
the generative tubes and their ducts, but for the most part
vanishes (possibly giving rise to glands of a doubtful nephridial
nature), and that the body cavity and vascular system has an
exclusively pseudoccelic origin.
In the Mollusca the ccelom and vascular space have not
been generally sufficiently distinguished from one another.
There seems, however, to be no doubt that the pericardial
VOL. XXVII, PART 35.—NEW SER. PP
539 ADAM SEDGWICK.
cavity of the Lamellibranchiata and Gasteropoda repre-
sents the entire celom. The reasons for this conclusion are
(1) the pericardial cavity is always shut off from the vascular
system; (2) it communicates with the exterior by a pair of
nephridia.
The generative organs have no relation to the ccelom, so
far as is known, in either of the above Molluscan gronps; but
in the Cephalopoda the generative cells are developed from
the mesoderm lining a certain part of the celom. This gene-
rative part of the ccelom seems, however, to be shut off in
the adult from the viscero-pericardial sac.
This fact, viz. the coelomic nature of the generative organs
of the Cephalopoda, together with the fact that in other
Molluscs the generative organs either dehisce into one of the
nephridia, which morphologically are part of the cclom, or
possess ducts which open close to or into the nephridial ducts,
seems, to say the least of it, in favour of the view that the
generative organs of all Molluscs were originally coelomic and
that the present arrangement found in the majority is secondary.
The question, of course, can only be settled definitely by em-
bryological investigations, but, unfortunately, embryology does
not speak clearly on the point.
There can then, from the point of view of adult anatomy, be
but little doubt that the pericardial cavity (and viscero-peri-
cardial and generative sacs in Cephalopoda) alone is ccelomic
in the Mollusca, and that the other system of spaces whether
simulating a body cavity asin Chiton and other Gastero-
poda, or forming a close meshwork of spaces as in Lamel-
libranchs, are vascular and non-celomic spaces; and it is
only necessary for embryology to bear out this conclusion to
settle the matter definitely. Unfortunately, embryologists have
not for the most part sufficiently regarded in their investigations
the importance of the point, and, for the majority of Mollusca,
we are in ignorance as to the exact method of development of
the pericardium as opposed to the heart and vascular spaces.
Rabl (No. 26), Patten (No. 25 a), and Ziegler (No. 36) have
described mesoblastic bands in Planorbis, Patella, and
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 537
Cyclas respectively, arising in the typically Annelidan manner;
but Ziegler, so far as I am aware, has alone succeeded in ascer-
taining what part these bands take in the formation of the peri-
cardium, generative organs and kidney. The generative cells are
derived from the mesoblastic bands. The pericardial cavity arises
as two cavities—one in each band—which subsequently unite.
The kidneys are hollowed out in certain masses of cells of the
bands. These results, if generally applicable, appear to con-
firm absolutely the anatomical proof of the celomic nature of
the Molluscan pericardium. It is interesting to notice that in
Ziegler’s figure (fig. 27) the developing pericardial vesicles have
exactly the same relation to the primary body cavity or vas-
cular space, i.e. they lie within it, as the nephridial vesicles of
Peripatus have to the vascular cavity of the leg.
There are certain animals to which the above general con-
siderations as to the distinctness of the ccelom and vascular
system do not apply. I refer more especially to the N ermer-
tinea and Hirudinea. In the Nermertinea, according to
Oudemans (No. 24), and in the Hirudinea, according to
Bourne (No. 4a), structures which it is difficult to believe are
not nephridia open into the vascular system. Ido not intend to
discuss these cases now, because, on the one hand, this paper is
already too long, and because, on the other, I do not think our
present knowledge is sufficient to enable this to be done with
profit. But I venture to submit with regard to them that
it is not clear in either case that the vascular system into
which the nephridia open is homologous with that of other
types. The very fact that there is a communication with the
exterior is a strong point in favour of the space being celomic ;
and it should be remembered that very little is known with
regard to its development in either group.
In conclusion, I may point out, that whereas in most
animals, e.g. Annelida, Mollusca, the vascular space or
pseudoceele appears before the celom, in Peripatus the ceelom
appears first, and that in Arthropods, at least, the vascular
space is in the early stages very commonly occupied by yolk,
while the celom is entirely free from yolk. ‘This latter
5388 ADAM SEDGWICK.
fact would seem to imply some connection between the vas-
cular space and the enteric space; and I would also desire
to point out that the ccelom, generative glands, and nephridia
can, in all animals whose development is at all well known, be
traced back to a very early embryonic structure, which appears
at the very beginning of development, gives rise to no other
structures, and itself arises in very different ways in different
animals. ‘The embryonic structure [ refer to is in some cases
the mesoblastic bands, and in others enteric diverticula. That
these two kinds of coelomic rudiments, as I may call them, are
homologous cannot be doubted, but which, if either, of the
methods of origin is primitive, cannot in my opinion at present
be settled.
SUMMARY OF THE ABOVE REMARKS ON THE C@LOM AND
Bopy Cavity.
Tt is well known that the vascular system of the Arthropoda
is in direct communication with the body cavity, and that the
vessels are, for the most part, very rudimentary. In fact the
blood is driven by the heart or dorsal vessel into the body
cavity, and returned directly through the lateral cardiac ostia
into the heart. In no other group of animals does this direct
communication exist between the heart and the pericardium.
It is therefore important to determine by the study of
development, whether or no the blood-containing body and
pericardial cavities of the Arthropoda are homologous with the
corresponding structures of other types, in which they do not
contain blood.
The development of the Arthropodan heart and body cavity
is in most cases extremely difficult to follow on account of the
large amount of food yolk present in the embryos, and there
is not, at present, any completely satisfactory history of it.
The development of Peripatus capensis, which is a true
Arthropod, so far as its body cavity and vascular system are
concerned, is comparatively easy to follow.
The coelom appears in the ordinary manner as a series of
cavities, one in each mesoblastic somite.
The somites, which are at first ventro-lateral in position,
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPR SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 539
soon acquire a dorsal extension, and the cavity in each of them
becomes divided into two parts—a ventral part which passes
into the appendage, and a dorsal part which comes into contact
but does not unite with its fellow of the opposite side on the
dorsal wall of the enteron.
The dorsal portions of the somites early become obliterated
in the anterior part of the body, but posteriorly they persist,
and those of the same side unite with each other so as to form
two tubes which are the generative glands.
The ventral or appendicular portions persist and retain their
original isolation throughout life. They give rise to two
structures :
(1) To a coiled tube, which acquires an external opening
through the ventral body wall at the base of the appendage
and constitutes the nephridium of the adult ;
(2) To a small vesicle, which is contained in the appendage
and constitutes the internal blind end of the tubular or nephri-
dial portion of the somite. (The opening of the nephridium
into the vesicle is funnel shaped, and is commonly known as
the internal funnel-shaped opening of the former.)
From the above account it follows (1) that the ccelom of the
embryo of Peripatus capensis gives rise to the nephridia
and generative glands, but to no part of the body cavity of the
adult ; (2) that the nephridia of the adult do not open into the
body cavity.
The body cavity of the adult consists, as is well known, of
four divisions :—(a) the central compartment containing the
intestine and generative organs, (4) the pericardial cavity,
(c) the lateral compartments containing the nerve-cords and
salivary glands, and (d) the portion in the appendage.
Of these, without going into details, it may be said that a
arises as a space between the ectoderm and the endoderm, 8, c,
and d as spaces in the thickened somatic walls of the somites.
The spaces are in communication with each other.
The heart arises as a part of a@ which becomes separated
from the rest. Posteriorly it acquires paired openings into
the pericardium. It thus appears that the heart and various
540 ADAM SEDGWICK.
divisions of the body cavity of the adult form a series of spaces
which have nothing to do with the celom. They all com-
municate with each other and seem to form a series of enor-
mously dilated vascular trunks, of which the heart is the
narrowest and alone possesses the property of rhythmically
contracting.
To sum up it appears that the colom in Peripatus is an
inconspicuous structure in the adult, and has no connection
with the body cavity ; while, on the other hand, the spaces of
the vascular system are but little subdivided, and form the
heart and various divisions of the adult body cavity.
Tf these results are applicable to the Arthropoda generally,
and there is no reason, from the similarity of the adult anatomy,
to doubt that they will be found to be so, the following mor-
phological features may be added to those generally stated as
appertaining to the group—ccelom inconspicuous, body
cavity consisting entirely of vascular spaces.
In Vertebrates and most Annelids, on the other hand, the
parts in question are arranged as follows:—Body cavity
entirely celomic; vascular spaces broken up into
a complicated system of channels (arteries, veins,
capillaries).
In most Molluscs, finally, the pericardium alone is ccelomic ;
the vascular spaces being represented by the heart and the
more or less complicated system of spaces in the body.
List oF PAPERS REFERRED TO.
1. Baxrour, F. M.—‘ A Treatise on Comparative Embryology,’ vol. i, London,
1885 (2nd ed.).
2. Batrour, F. M.—‘A Treatise on Comparative Embryology,’ vol. ii,
London, 1881.
3. Ba.rour, F. M.—“ Notes on the Development of the Araneina,” ‘ Quart.
Journ. of Mier. Sci.,’ vol. xx.
4. Batrour, F. M.—‘‘ Anatomy and Development of Peripatus capen-
sis,” ‘Quart. Journ. of Micro. Sci.,’ vol. xxiii.
4a. Bournr, A. G.—‘‘ Contributions to the Anatomy of the Hirudinea,”
© Quart. Journ. of Micro. Sci.,’ vol. xxiv.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. d41
5.
21.
22.
23.
. Kennet, J.—“ Entwick. v. Peripatus Edwardsii u. torquatus,’
Brooxs, W. K.—“ Lucifer: a Study in Morphology,” ‘ Phil. Trans.,’
1882.
. CraPaRbpE.—“ Studien iiber Acarinen,” ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool., Bd. xviii.
. Fremurne, W.— Zellsubstanz, Kern, und Zelltheilung,’ Leipzig, 1882.
. Garrron, E.—“ Beitrige zur Anatomie u. Histologie von Peripatus,”
Schneider’s ‘ Zoologische Beitrage,’ Bd. i, p. 33.
. Garrron.— Beitrage zur Anatomie und Histologie von Peripatus,”
ibid., p. 145.
. Hacxet, E.—‘“‘ Die Physemarien (Haliphysema und Gastrophy-
sema),” ‘Jena. Zeitschrift,’ 1877.
. Heatucots, F. G.—‘ The Early Development of Julus terrestris,’’
‘Quart. Journ. of Mier. Sci.,’ vol. xxvi, p. 449.
. Hatscuex, B.—“ Zur Entwick. des Kopfes von Polygordius,” ‘ Arbei-
ten a. d. Zool. Inst. Wien,’ Bad. vi.
. Kennet, J.—“ Entwickelungsgeschichte v. Peripatus Edwardsii und
P. torquatus,” ‘Arbeiten a. d. Zool. Inst. Wirzburg,’ Bd. vii.
2
Theil ii, ‘ Arbeiten a. d. Zoo). Inst. Wurzburg,’ Bd. viii.
. Kietvenserc, N.—“ The Development of the Earthworm Lumbricus
trapezoides,” ‘Quart. Journ. of Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xix.
3. Kowatrvsky, A.—‘ Etude sur ’Embryologie du Dentale,” ‘ Annales du
Musée d’Histoire Naturelle de Marseille ’—‘ Zoologie,” vol. i.
. Kowa.Evsky and Marron.—“ Documents pour l’Histoire embryogenique
des Aleyonaire,” ibid.
. LANKESTER, E, Ray.—‘‘The Structure of Haliphysema Tumano-
>
wiczii,” ‘Quart. Journ. of Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xix, p. 476.
. Leypic, F.—‘ Zelle u. Gewebe,’ 1885.
. LirperKtUHN.— Beitrage zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Spongillen,’
’
‘ Miiller’s Arch.,’ 1856.
MarsHaLt, W.—‘ Die Ontogoniev. Reniera filigrana,” ‘ Zeit. f. wiss,
Zool.,’ Bd. 37.
Metscunikorr, E.— Spongiologische Studien,” ‘Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’
Bd. 32.
Metscunikxorr, E.—‘ Embryologische Studien an Medusen,’ Wien, 1886.
23a. MoseLey, H. N.—“ On the Structure and Development of Peripatus
24.
capensis,” ‘ Phil. Trans.,’ 1874.
OvuprEmans, A. C.—‘The Circulatory and Nephridial Apparatus of the
Nemertea,” ‘ Quart. Journ. of Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xxv, Supplement, p. 1.
25. Patten, W.—* The Development of Phryganids,” ‘Quart. Journ. of
Mier. Sci.,’ vol. xxiv, 1884.
542 ADAM SEDGWICK.
25a. Patten, W.— The Embryology of Patella,” ‘ Arbeiten a. d. Zool. Inst.
Wien,’ Bd. vi.
26. Ras, C.— Ueber die Entwick. d. Tellerschnecken (Planorbis),”
‘Morph, Jahrbuch,’ v, 1879.
97. SALENSKy, W.—“ Etudes sur le developpement des Annélides,” ‘ Archives
de Biologie,’ 3 and 4.
98. Savinte-Kent.—‘ Manual of the Infusoria,’ London, 1881-82.
29. Scnuizz, F. E.— Trichoplax adherens,” ‘ Zoologischer Anzeiger,’ 1883,
p- 92.
30. Scuutze, F. E.—“ Die Familie der Aplysinide,’ ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’
id xxx.
31. Sepewick, A.A—“‘On the Original Function of the Canal of the Central
Nervous System,” ‘Studies from the Morphological Laboratory, Cam-
bridge,’ vol. ii, Pt. 1.
82. Sepewick, A.---‘‘On the Origin of Metameric Segmentation,” ‘ Quart.
Journ. of Micro. Sci.,’ vol. xxiv.
33. Sepewick, A.—“ The Development of Peripatus capensis,” ‘ Proc.
Roy. Soc.,’ 1885.
33a. Sepewick, A.—“On the Development of the Cape Species of Peri-
patus,” Pts. I and II, ‘Quart. Journ. of Micro. Sci.,’ vols. xxv
and XXvi.
34. Sottas, W. J.—“On the Development of Halisarca lobularis,”
‘Quart. Journ. of Micro. Sci.,’ vol. xxiv.
35. SpencEL.— Notes on Sipunculus,” ‘Tagebl. Naturf. Vers. Miinchen,’
1877.
36. ZineterR, H. H.—* Die Entwick. v. Cyclas cornea,”’ ‘ Zeit. f. wiss.
Zool.,’ Bd. xli, p. 525.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 543
EXPLANATION OF PLATES XXXIV, XXXV,
MXXVE & MXXVII,
Illustrating Mr. A. Sedgwick’s Paper on “ The Development of
the Cape Species of Peripatus.”
List of Reference Letters.
a. Anus. am. Amoeboid wandering cells in body cavity (pseudoccele).
a. s. ph. Septum attaching anterior part of pharynx to dorsal body wall,
at junction of somites 1 and 2. a. v. Anterior diverticulum of nephridium
of oral papilla. &. Space formed by withdrawal of endoderm from ectoderm.
b. Space formed in the parietal thickening of the somites. 4. app. Space
formed in appendage. 4. dc. Space formed by separation of endoderm from
ventral ectoderm. 0. dc\..The ventral of the two spaces formed in wall of
somites at their ventral corner. 4. 4. Space formed by separation of endoderm
from dorsal ectoderm. 4. /at. Space formed in parietal mesoderm. 0. pe. The
dorsal of the two spaces formed in the wall of the somites at their ventral
corner. Or. Brain. duc. cav. Buccal cavity. cc. c. Cords of cells projecting
into pericardial cavity. c.g. Cerebral grooves. c.g. Groove in brain. com.
Commissure between the two halves of the brain. c. 0. 2. Circumoral part
of central nervous system. d. . Dividing nuclei of endoderm near the lip
of the blastopore. d.s. Dorsal sheet of somatic mesoderm. d.s. 1, 2, &.
Dorsal part of somites 1, 2, &c. e. Hye. ec. Hctoderm. ez. Endoderm. /.
Funnel-shaped opening of tubular part of nephridium into internal vesicle.
F.1, &. Legs. (f. dl. Line of obliterated blastopore between the mouth
and anus. gez. Germinal nuclei. gez. d. Genital duct. gez. 0. Generative
organ. g.andy.g. Alimentary canal. J. Jaw. 7. s. Ventral organ of jaw.
I. Lips. /e. Internal backward projection of jaw. 7. 7. Limb-ridge. 7.8.1, 2. &.
Lateral portions of somite contained in the legs. 7. s.¢. 1, 2, &c. Tubular
portion of nephridial celom of appendages 1, 2, &c. (segmental organ).
1. s.v.1, 2, &. Internal vesicular portion of nephridial ccelom of appendages 1,
2, &c. M. Mouth. mé. Mesoblastic band. me. Anterior part of thickening
of parietal mesoderm of the somites. m./. Muscles of internal projection
of jaws. m.ph. Muscular wall of pharynx. mm. ¢. Posterior part of thickening
of parietal mesoderm of the somites. 0.7.1, 2, &c. The external opening
of nephridium of somites 1,2, &c. or. p. Oral papilla. 0. s. 3. Opening of
somite 3. p.g. Primitive groove. pf. Pharynx. ph. m. Pharyngeal meso-
derm from the splanchnic walls of the anterior somites. p. p. pre-oral
pouch of alimentary canal. pr. Proctodeal lining. p. sf. Primitive streak.
544 ADAM SEDGWICK.
R. Rectum. 98. 1, 2, 3, &c. The first, second, and third somites, &c.
sal. gl. Salivary gland. sep. Septum dividing the lateral portion of the
somite from the dorsal. s/.g. Slime-gland. J. 0. 1. Rudimentary nephridial
portion of somite. s¢. Stomodeum or its lining. 7. Tongue. v. ex. Ventral
endoderm of alimentary canal derived from the cells intermediate between the
ectoderm and endoderm when the blastopore was open along its whole length.
v. 2. Ventral nerve-cord. v.0. Ventral organ. v.s. Ventral sheet of somatic
mesoderm. v. sp. Vascular space. . White matter of central nervous
system.
All the figures are of Peripatus capensis, and drawn with Zeiss’s
camera, ob. C, oc. 2, unless it is otherwise stated.
Fic. 1.—Transverse section through a late embryo of Stage a (length
*53 mm.), two sections behind the blastopore. The primitive groove is very
deep and is hardly to be distinguished from the blastopore. The mesoblastic
bands do not extend in front of the hind end of the blastopore. The primi-
tive groove was confined to the front end of the streak. The latter extended
through eighteen sections. ;
Fics. 2 and 3.—Two transverse sections through an embryo of Stage B
(length *65 mm.) with one somite, still solid, and separate from the front end of
the mesoblastic band. Primitive streak extended through twenty-one sections.
Fig. 2. Through the single somite which is present. (The section is
slightly oblique, passing in front of the somite on the left side.)
Fig. 3. Two sections in front of the anterior end of the somite. The
endodermal nuclei at the lips of the blastopore were dividing actively.
One such is shown at d. x.
Fic. 4.—Section through a late embryo of Stage B (Stage of fig. 25,
Pt. I) in front of the mouth. Reduced 3.
Fic. 5, a—f—A series of sections through an embryo (length 1 mm.)
of the same age as the last (Stage B, fig. 25, Pt. I). Reduced 3. Four
separate somites could be distinctly made out on each side. Thirty sections
were obtained through the streak. The groove extends the whole length of
the streak.
a. Through the mouth.
b. Between the mouth and anus. The blastopore lips have fused ; their
line of fusion is marked by a slight groove (f. 4/.).
ec. Through the hind end of the anus. The mesoblastic bands in this
region are not yet broken up into somites.
d. Through the front end of the primitive streak, four sections behind
the last.
e. Through primitive streak, eight sections behind last.
J. Through primitive streak, nine sections behind the last.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 9545
Fic. 6, a—d.—A series of sections through an embryo of Stage c (fig. 26,
Pt. 1). Reduced 3.
a. In front of the mouth, through the pre-oral lobes. he anterior wall
of the alimentary (ez.) just touched.
6. Through the mouth.
c. Between the mouth and anus. Wide separation of the somites. Very
thin ventral ectoderm .
d. Through the hind end of the body, in the region of the curvature.
The embryo is cut in two places, through the anus and through the
growing point (primitive streak and gr oove).
Fics. 7—12 are from a young embryo of Stage p (fig. 28, Pt. I). The
embryos of this age are always much narrower, both dorso-ventrally and
laterally, than those older or younger. Reduced 3.
Fig. 7. Section through the roots of the b udding antenne.
Fig. 8. Through the anterior part of the mouth.
Fig. 9. Through the posterior part of the third somite, in the region of
the outgrowth of the oral papilla (or. p.). The sheets of cells extend-
ing from the dorsal and ventral ends of the somites are present (d. s.
and v.s.). The endoderm and ectoderm have separated from one
another, excepting along the dorsal middle line. The cavity so formed
is marked 4. 4. and 6. dc.
Fig. 10. Through the anterior part of the fourth somite (in front of the
region of the future leg), to show the anterior part of the thickening
‘of the somatic mesoderm (me.).
Fig. 11. Through the region of the future leg (posterior part of the
somite), showing the position of the thickening on the ventral side of
the outgrowth.
Fig. 12. Through the fifth somite. The changes which have produced
the parietal mass of cells from the somatic mesoderm have not yet
occurred here. The somite is partly collapsed dorsally and ventrally.
Fie. 13.—Through the third somite of an em bryo of Stage p, slightly older
than the last. Reduced 3. On the left haud side the section passes through
the posterior part of the somite, and shows the developing oral papilla and
septum tending to divide the cavity of the somite into a part within the
appendage and a part within the body. ‘The first trace of the third system of
body cavity (4. dat.) is visible.
Fic. 14.—Section through an embryo of Stage p, through the pre-oral
somite, brain, and eye. The latter (e.) has the form of an open pit. Re-
duced 3.
Fie. 15.—Section through a slightly older embryo, showing a more ad-
vanced stage in the brain and eye. Reduced 2.
546 ADAM SEDGWICK.
Fic. 16, a, 6.—Two sections through the mouth of a late embryo of Stage
D (fig. 29, Pt. I). Reduced 3.
ad. Through the anterior part in the region of the stomodeal in-
growth.
b. Through the posterior part.
Fic. 17, a—d.—A series of sections through the region of the third somite
of an embryo of same age as the last (fig. 29, Pt. 1). Reduced 4.
a. Through the anterior part of the somite, in front of the attachment
of the parietal thickening (me.). The parietal thickening always
appears to be free in front; it is attached behind.
6. Point of attachment of parietal thickening to somatic mesoderm.
c. Two sections further back.
d. Six sections further back through the region of the appendage
(or. p.).
Fie. 18, a—c.—Three sections through the seventh somite of the same
embryo as that from which fig. 17 was taken. Reduced 4.
a and & show the leg-ridge, which in fig. 18c—a section through the
hinder part of the somite—is enlarged to form the developing fourth
leg.
A few sections behind Fig. 18 ¢ the cavity of the somite extends into the
appendage. The anterior less developed part of the mesodermal
thickening lies immediately within the leg-ridge, while the posterior
larger part occupies the appendage itself.
Fies. 19, a, 6; 20; 21, a—c are from sections through young embryos of
Stage BE. Reduced 3.
a. Through the head and first somite. The optic pit is closed.
b. Through the mouth and first somite. This section shows the
developing lip (Z.). In this and the previous section the mesoderm
cells next the stomodzal ectoderm have proliferated to form the com-
mencing pharyngeal and lingual musculature.
Fig. 20. Through the second somite, with the third somite overlapping
dorsally.
Fig. 21 a. Through the anterior part of the third somite. The limb-
ridge (/. 7.) and the mesodermal thickening with its cavity (0. Jat.) are
well shown.
6. Ten sections further back, through the anterior part of the appen-
dage (oral papilla). The mesodermal thickening is much larger.
c. Through the centre of the appendage. The somite is nearly divided
into two parts by the septum (sep.). The portion in the appen-
dage sends down a diverticulum, which lies against the outer border
of the nerve-cord and reaches the ectoderm.
Figs. 22—- 25 are through a late embryo of Stage ©. Reduced $.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 54:7
a. Through the pre-oral region, at the level of the cerebral commissure.
The commencing cerebral groove (c. g.) is shown.
b. Through the mouth and hind end of first somite, showing the
rudimentary nephridium (s. 0. 1). One half of the section only is
represented. (Drawn with Zeiss’s D, oc. 2).
Fig. 23, a—e. A series through the third somite.
a. The anterior part of the mesodermal thickening and its cavity (d’.) is
much enlarged. The section passes through the hind end of the
jaw (J.) and the lip (Z.).
b. A few sections further back. A tube (a. v.) ending blindly in
front, and opening behind into the limb portion of the somite, is
present.
c. Nine sections behind fig. 23 4, through the point of junction
of the portion of the somite in the body (s. 3), the portion in the
appendage (/. s. 3), and the anterior diverticulum (a. v. of Fig. 23 0).
d. Through the centre of the appendage, seven sections behind the
last. The anterior end of the fourth somite (s. 4) is visible, and
rudiment of the slime-gland as an ectodermal ingrowth at the apex the
of the oral papilla (s/. g.) is present.
e. Nine sections behind the last. The external opening of the third
somite covered over by the lip (Z.), which has grown back to this
point, and the mesodermal thickening and its cavity (4. Jat.) of the
wall of the fourth somite are present.
Fig. 24. Between the oral papilla and first leg, through the fourth somite,
twelve sections behind fig. 23 e.
Fig. 25. Through the fourth leg. The eighth somite overlaps dorsally.
The leg portion of the seventh somite opens to the exterior (0. s. 7).
The great ectodermal thickening, which is so conspicuous in embryos
of this stage, is cut through at d.
Fic, 26.—Transverse section through the anus and twentieth somite of an
embryo of Stage p. The rudiment of the proctodeum with its special lining
(pr.) is present. The germinal nuclei (gez.) are present, both in the endoderm
and splanchnic mesoderm.
Fic. 27.—Transverse section through an embryo of Stage =, at the region
of the seventeenth somite. The germinal nuclei are present in large numbers.
The ccelom has not yet become divided into body and leg portions (see right
hand side of section).
Fic. 28.—Longitudinal vertical section through an embryo of Stage c.
The section passes through mouth and anus. The hind end of the body
is bent round and projects forward, bearing the primitive streak on its ventral
surface. The alimentary canal reaches the anterior end of the body, and the
transverse commissure (com.) connecting the two halves of the cerebral
ganglion is visible in front of the mouth. The modified endoderm (s/.) or
548 ADAM SEDGWICK.
ingrown ectoderm—whichever view of its nature be taken—of the anterior
(future dorsal) wall of the stomodeum is present. Zeiss’s A, oc, 2.
Fic. 29.—Longitudinal vertical section through an embryo of Stage D.
The hind end of the body has grown and become spirally coiled. The primi-
tive streak is still present—but in a rudimentary form—on the ventral surface
behind the anus. It is marked by a slight pit. A section to one side of the
middle line of this embryo shows a considerable mass of nuclei in connection
with it. The anterior end of the body has been drawn back in such a way
that no part of the alimentary canal projects in front of the mouth. The
anterior wall of the stomodeum is therefore now inclined dorsalwards and
slightly backwards. Zeiss’s A, oc. 2.
Fig. 30.—Longitudinal vertical section through the hind end of an embryo of
Stage E. The anus is now practically terminal, and the primitive streak
aborted. A rudiment of the latter still indeed exists, but there are no lateral
masses of nuclei. The rudiment of the proctodeum is present (also in the
last figure). Zeiss’s A, oc. 2.
Fic. 31.—Longitudinal vertical section through the anterior end of an
embryo of Stage EB. Zeiss’s C, oc. 2. Reduced 34. The anterior ectodermic
wall of the body has grown forward in the middle line, and separated from the
anterior wall of the alimentary canal (cf. fig. 34, Pt. I). The anterior wall
of the stomodzum has now become its dorsal wall, and is directed backwards ;
and an anterior pouch of the alimentary canal lies dorsal to it. The ventral
wall of the stomodeeum has began to be formed.
Fic. 32.—Longitudinal horizontal section through the anterior end of an
embryo of Stage D. Zeiss’s A, oc. 2.
Fics. 833—42 are transverse sections of an embryo of Stage F.
Fig. 33. Through the first somite, brain and cerebral grooves. The
section passes in front of the region where the two halves of the brain
are connected, and the eye (e.) is just included in the section on the
right side. Reduced 4.
Fig. 34. The section is taken at the junction of somites 1 and 2, and
passes through the posterior part of the brain, the anterior part of the
permanent buccal cavity, and the anterior wall of the pharynx (pA.)
The posterior part of the cerebral grooves (c. g.) are seen opening into
the buccal cavity, the roof (Z.) of which becomes the so-called tongue
of the adult. The jaw (J.) is visible on the right side. Reduced 3.
Fig. 35. Through the mouth (m.) ; the opening which leads from the buccal
cavity into the pharynx. In consequence of the contraction of the
ectoderm, the second somite (s. 2) is hardly visible, and the median
part of the space J. A. is obliterated. Reduced 3.
Fig. 36. Behind the mouth, through the oral papille (07. .). The slime-
gland (s/.g.) is cut through just behind its opening, and the anterior
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 549
part of the ventral ccelom of the third som ite (internal vesicular por-
tion, 7. s.3.) is shown. Reduced 3.
Fig. 37. Immediately behind the junction of the pharynx and mesenteron,
through the external opening of the salivary gland (ventral division of
somite 3) into the hinder part of the buccal cavity (duc. cav.).
Fig. 38. Through the dorsal division of somite 4 and the hind part of the
ventral division of somite 3, the opening between the two parts (in-
ternal vesicular portion, /. s. v. 3, and tubular portion, /. s. ¢.3) of which
are shown. m./. Muscles of internal projection of jaws.
Fig. 38 a. One side of a section, a little behind fig. 38, to show the com-
mencing salivary gland (sal.g.). Zeiss’s D, oc. 2. Reduced 3.
Fig. 39. Between the oral papilla and first leg.
Fig. 40. Through the third leg, to show the ventral division of the sixth
somite. The tubular portion of this (nephridium of third leg) isa
straight tube (the lumen is not distinct, but this was probably due to
the contraction of the specimen), opening externally at o. z. 6, and in-
ternally into the internal vesicular portion (J. s. . 6).
Fig. 41. Through the twentieth somite, in the region of the generative cells.
The differentiation of the various divisions of the body cavity has hardly
reached this part of the body, 4.4., d.pc., 6.dc'., being only present in
a rudimentary form. The endoderm is slightly shrivelled up. The
generative nuclei are still in the endoderm, though some of them project
into the body cavity. Zeiss’s D, oc. 2. Reduced 3.
Fig. 42. Through the rectum and anal papille (rudimentary eighteenth leg).
The dorsal and ventral divisions of the somite are in communication.
Fics. 43—46 are from old embryos of Stage F. Zeiss’s D, oc. 2. Re-
duced 4.
Fig. 43. Through the seventeenth somite, to show the dorsal division of the
somite (d.s.), which may now be called the generative gland. The gut
has separated from the latter, so that the two divisions of the part of
the body cavity marked 4. dc’. communicate. The dorsal part of the
section only is drawn.
Fig. 44. Through the anal papilla (rudimentary eighteenth leg) and twenty-
first somite. The two parts of the somite are in communication, and
the ventral has almost acquired an opening to the exterior. This
opening will be the generative opening.
Figs. 45 and 46.—Dorsal parts of two transverse sections from the middle
region of the body in front of the generative region ; 46 is the anterior.
In 45 the dorsal division of the somite (d.s.) is not yet obliterated; in
46 it has entirely vanished, and is represented only by the thickened
layer of cells which form the veutral wall of the heart.
Fies. 47 and 48.—Through the generative organs of an embryo of Stage «,
550 ADAM SEDGWICK.
in the region where they are detached from the pericardial floor. Zeiss’s F,
oc. 2.
Fic. 49.—Longitudinal vertical section through the anterior part of the
body of an embryo of Stage r. Reduced 3.
Fic. 50.—One side of a transverse section throngh a young embryo of Stage
F. To show the latest stage of the rudimentary nephridium of the first somite
(s. 0. 1), in close contact with the outer side of the hind part of the brain (a
few nuclei of the latter are indicated). Zeiss’s D, oc. 2. Reduced 3.
Fic. 51.—One side of a transverse section through the brain of a late em-
bryo of Stage r. To show the two separate parts of the first somite. The
cerebral grooves are closed. Reduced 3.
Fic. 52.—Transverse section of the sixth leg of an old embryo of Stage Fr.
To show the funnel-shaped opening (/.) of the tubular portion of the nephridium
into the vesicular internal portion (/. s. v.), and the relation of the latter to the
body cavity (pseudoccele) of the leg (4. app.). Zeiss’s D, oc. 2. Reduced 3.
Fic. 53,@ and 6. Longitudinal horizontal sections of two contiguous legs
of an embryo of same stage as last. Reduced 3.
OBSERVATIONS ON OCRIODRILUS LAOUUM. Boul
Morphological and Biological Observations on
Criodrilus lacuum, Hoffmeister.’
By
Dr. L. Orley.
Zoolog. Instit. University of Budapest.
With Plate XXXVIII, figs. 1 to 8.
In Vejdovsky’s very complete work, ‘System und Mor-
phologie der Oligocheten,” Prag., 1884, which bears the
character of a useful text-book on the morphology of the
Oligocheta, I find only a scanty and incomplete account of
the very interesting terricolous form, Criodrilus. On pages
16 and 58 he says: “ Lage der Hoden, Eierstécke, Samen-
leiter und Samentaschen, sowie Gurtels unbekannt.” ‘ Leider
weiss Man sehr wenig von dem Leben eines so merkwirdigen
Oligocheeten.” I think that these assertions by this well-
known investigator justify me in publishing my own observa-
tions, incomplete though they are, relative to this worm.
Criodrilus lacuum was discovered by the well-known
German zoologist Fritz Miller, in 1844, in the so-called
“Tegel-see,” near Berlin, and in the following year was de-
scribed and figured by Hoffmeister.? It is almost incredible
that fully thirty years should have elapsed since its discovery
without its being found again. In 1876 this worm, found in
a branch of the Danube near Linz, was again mentioned by
1 Translated from the MS. by Wm. B. Benham, B.Sc.
2 «Die bis jetzt bekannten Arten aus der Fam. der Regenwiirmer,’ Bruns-
wick, 1845, p. 41.
VOL, XXVII, PART 4,—NEW SER. QQ
Soe DR. L. ORLEY.
Hatschek! in his work, which furnishes contributions to the
knowledge of the development and morphology of the
Annelids.
Two years later Hatschek® recognised this worm, described
its development, and provided Vejdovsky with material for his
researches.®
Like Hatschek, I found Criodrilus in the neighbourhood of
Buda-Pesth, and described it in a communication to the Hun-
garian Academy of Science.* Recently it was found by Rosa’
in Italy, where it lives in the basin of the Po; somewhat
earlier, too, it was noted by Panceri.®
I have no doubt that it exists in other parts of Europe, and
that only its habit of concealing itself has placed it amongst
rare and hitherto little known Earthworms. The following
description ought to lead to the discovery and to the better
knowledge of it.
Criodrilus lacuum. Hoffm.
1845. ‘ Die bis jetzt bekannten Arten d. Faun. d.
Regenwiirmer.’
A mudworm 4—12 cm. in length, and about 5—10 mm. in
breadth, of a dark brown or greenish colour dorsally, with
lighter, sometimes reddish colouration ventrally, with rusty-
yellow areole, and milk-white, horn-like spermatophores near
the male genital pore.
The body is quadrangular (though this is less noticeable
‘ *Sitzungsber. der Kais. Akad. d. Wiss. in Wien,’ Bd. 74, pp. 442—459.
2 “Studien z. Entwick. d. Anneliden,” ‘ Art. Zool. Inst. Wien,’ Bd. 1.
* (a) ‘ Monograph. d. Enchytreiden,’ Prag., 1879. (4) “ Ueber der Entwick.
des Herzens bei Criodrilus,” ‘Sitzungsb. k. béhm. ges. der Wiss..’ Prag.,
1879. (¢) ‘System und Morphologie der Oligocheten,’ Prag., 1884.
* (a) Amagyar. ‘ Oligochet. Fauna,’ Buda-Pesth, 1881. (4) ‘ Revisio et
distributio specierum terricolarum regionis palarctice,’? Buda-Pesth, 1885.
® ** Nota sui Lombrici del Veneto,”’ ‘ Atti del R. Inst. Ven. di Sci. lett. ed.
atti, b: 1¥aiS.evie
® “ Catalogo degli anellidi d’Italia,” ‘ Atti d. Soc. Ital. d. Sci. Nat.,’ 1875,
xvii, p. 201.
OBSERVATIONS ON CRIODRILUS LACUUM. 553
anteriorly), gradually narrowing posteriorly, and ending in
a pointed, yellowish, and often regenerated tail. When the
worm is contracted the dorsal surface is usually depressed.
The number of somites is 200—250, or more. The somites
are well defined, obscurely triannulated, and somewhat pressed
together towards the tail. There is no dorsal pore. The last
or anal somite is longer than those just in front. The anus
itself is dorsal. There are rounded swellings on the somites
Xe Sa, XU, ANG, XII.
The prostomium is moderately elongate and as long as the
buccal somite, from which it is distinctly separated, without
having a prolongation dorsally or a furrow ventrally (Hoff-
meister’s description—“ Die Lippe ist mit dem Mundseg-
ment verwachsen”—is incorrect). The prostomial pore is
indistinct.
The four rows of sete extend along the corners of the body.
The distance between the rows is nearly equal. The setz of
each pair are somewhat apart; they are not prominent, and
are slightly curved with rough ends.
The genital organs are on the same plan as in the Lum-
bricinee, and present no peculiarities. The seminal reservoirs,
with their lateral czeca, extend through the somites 1x to x11.
The true testes last for only a short period, during which
they early break up into spermatogonia, so that I could recog-
nise the two pairs, which lie in the somites x1 and xu, only by
the remnants. The two pairs of ciliated rosettes have an
obscure plate-like structure ; those of the first pair lie on the
septum between the somites x and x1; those of the hinder pair
on that between xi and x11, so that they project into the somites
x1 and xi respectively. The sperm ducts are spirally coiled
at the base of the rosettes, unite with one another at the level
of the somites x11 and x11, and thence a wider, tortuous,
common canal extends on each side to the external pore on the
ventral surface of somite xv, between the two couples of sete.
The termination is simple; without an atrium there is only a
large gland (“vulva’”’ of Hoffmeister), which probably serves
for the construction of the cocoon. There are two pairs of
554 DR. L. ORLEY.
spermathece, which appear to open on the ventral surface
between the somites 1x, x and x, x1 respectively.
The ovaries lie in somite x11I, one on each side of the ventral
blood-vessel, attached to the hinder face of the septum between
the somites x11 and x111; they contain many ripe eggs, which
are chiefly found at the free end of the ovary. I have not
found a pointed prolongation at the distal end of the ovary.
The oviducts lie opposite each ovary between the somites XIII
and xiv; their plate-like funnels project into the former somite,
and their very diminutive canal opens to the exterior on the
ventral surface of somite xiv.
I have not found separate yolk and cement glands. The
horn-like spermatophores (Hoffmeister’s “ penis-formige
Korpchen ”), 6 to 8 mm. in length, are found in the neighbour-
hood of the male pore; their number is variable, and they are
usually placed ventrally, although exceptionally they are to be
met with on the dorsal surface. As a rule only two are situated
on the neural side of somite x11, close to the ventral sete ;
though very often they are some distance from them. They
are always in pairs, from two to six in number ; only once have
I found eight spermatophores, which were arranged irregularly
round the male pore. These structures are products of copula-
tion, and appear only during this operation ; whether they are
formed in the sperm-duct, or by the swellings in front of the
genital pore, I am unable to say with certainty. The spermato-
phore, the shape of which is exactly rendered by fig. 7 (Pl.
XXXVIII), consists of an homogeneous, hyaline, mucous sub-
stance, in which are embedded numerous fine, enlongated fila-
ments. The lumen is fairly wide and deep, open at the end, and
filled with bundles of spermatozoa, which are massed together in
a spiral fashion. The fibres in the wall can scarcely be the pro-
duct of the epiderm cells; moreover, the spermatophores vary
so much in number and position that one can scarcely admit
that they are formed by the swellings. I think it more likely
that they are formed in the spermathecz, there filled with sper-
matozoa, and that they are then attached in position during
mutual copulation. The broad basal portion clings fast to the
OBSERVATIONS ON CRIODRILUS LACUUM. 55a
cuticle, but never grows closely with it, so that the spermato-
phore very easily falls away. That the great areola round the
male pore and the swelling in front of it play an important part
in copulation cannot be doubted, for, after the laying of the
eggs, these structures immediately decrease in size. In speci-
mens which I collected at the end of June I could find neither
the swellings nor the areola, and in some even the male pore
also had become indistinct.
As to the time of sexual maturity of Criodrilus nothing
positive is known. According to Vejdovsky the maturity
seems to be attained in the months of June and July, since
Hatschek found the cocoons with segmented eggs and embryos
in the middle of June, whilst Hoffmeister mentions the worms
furnished with ‘ pseudo-spermatophores ” at the beginning of
July; Vejdovsky himself has not studied mature worms. My
researches, however, extending over many years, show that the
embryos escaping from the egg in summer may attain sexual
maturity as early as February or March in the following year ;
indeed, in the most favorable seasons copulation may even
take place in these months. Copulation and egg laying take
place almost certainly in June, since I have found at the
beginning of July of this year no cocoons with embryos. The
best sign of maturity are the large and very striking sperma-
tophores, which are to be found regularly from March to the
end of May, certainly not later. The embryos escape from the
cocoons in May, June, and July; at the end. of the latter
month I have collected only empty egg cases. At first the
young worms are to be found amongst the thick roots of
aquatic plants, only later in the mud, where they pass the
winter and attain maturity. The clitellum, so very character-
istic of the Lumbricinz, is, as Hoffmeister rightly insisted,
absent. I have for many years collected these worms at all
seasons, yet I have found no trace of a clitellum, nor of the
so-called “ tubercula pubertatis ;” the great glandular areola
of the male genital pore appears to replace the clitellum.
The egg cases of the Lumbricine are known as roundish-
oval chitinous capsules with pointed appendages, and are
556 DR. L. ORLEY.
presumably secreted by the clitellum. The cocoons of the
Criodrilidz, however, are spindle-shaped, parchment like struc-
tures with a colour that changes; they are about 5 cm. in
length, rapidly diminishing towards each end. One end,
drawn out into strongly fibrous threads, serves for attachment
to the roots, or more rarely to the leaves and branches of
water plants; the other end truncated, with a dentate edge,
allows the embryos to escape. As is the form, so also is the
colour different. The perfectly newly laid cocoons are nearly
transparent, horny yellow in colour, but after a time they
become darker, and towards the time of hatching of the
embryos they are blackish in colour. This change in colour,
which reminds me of the egg cases of Shark embryos,' may
here too be traced to chemical changes.
The substance of the egg cases is not wholly chitinous ; at
any rate a large portion is dissolved in caustic potash ; on the
contrary, a sort of coagulated yolk and mucus take a large
share in their constitution. The substance itself is very easily
wetted, so that liquids and gases can diffuse through it.
The inside is filled with a fluid albuminous substance, allied
in density to white of egg; in this from eight to twenty eggs
are embedded, and in it are found the remains of the sub-
stance of the spermatophores as well as innumerable sperma-
tozoa, which are to be met with especially round the develop-
ing eggs; their appearance is reproduced in fig. 8, Pl. XXX VIII.
The number of eggs is very variable; usually only one third
of the fertilised eggs develop; the largest number of embryos
in a cocoon was eight, the smallest two.
The structure of these egg cases is especially well shown, if
freshly laid eggs, preserved in alcohol, are placed in water in
order that they may swell up. When such cocoons are care-
fully examined the swollen part is found to be banded; these
bands appear to correspond with the somites of the anterior
part of the body. This correspondence, as well as the fibrous
structure of the outermost layer (fig. 2) and the remains of the
1 LL. Orley, “Zur Physiol. der Haiembryonen,” ‘Termeszet. fiizetek,’ ix,
1885, Buda-Pesth.
*
OBSERVATIONS ON CRIODRILUS LACUUM. 557
spermatophores in the cocoon, allows one to suppose that the
moulted skin of the anterior part of the body takes a share in
the formation of the cocoon, just as in Lumbricine and Nephe-
lide, the egg case probably owes its origin to the moulting of
the clitellum. Since, however, the number of bands in this
egg case exceeds twenty, it is probable that the somites lying
behind the genital pores also take part in the formation of
the cocoon.!' The tough secretion which builds up the chief
portion of the cocoon, is probably furnished by the large swel-
lings around and in front of the genital pores, and by the
inner lining of the sperm duct. The process of formation of
these egg cases, which alone would lead to positive results, I
have unfortunately been unable to watch. Worms which I
kept in my aquarium always hid themselves under cover of the
roots of Sium latifolium, so that I was unable to overlook
their operations.
A transverse section through this cocoon shows three layers;
an inner yellowish and homogeneous layer, an outer strongly
fibrous, and a middle layer of interlaced strands (fig. 4). The
fibrous layer is most easily seen at that end of the cocoon
which is drawn out into threads (fig. 2), where they are col-
lected together into strands and finally separate out into
elastic fibres ; the latter serve for attachment to aquatic plants.
Towards the swollen portion the fibrous layer becomes thinner
at the expense of the middle layer.
The middle layer (fig. 5) consists of innumerable interwoven
bundles which are not separated into fibres. The network is
densest below and becomes looser above. It looks so very
much like a plant tissue, that a young botanist of this country
at first disputed as to the substance of the tissue. Some
thought it of vegetable origin.
The lowermost or basal layer is made up of very many
extremely delicate strata (fig. 6); these show a striated struc-
ture, and contain here and there fibrous elements. This layer
projects from the free end of the cocoon (fig. 3), is strongly
folded, and serves to close the egg case.
1 See the following paper, in which the Clitellum is described. —TRANSLATOR.
558 DRG. ORLEY.
The young are of a reddish colour, about 2—3 cm. in
length, when they leave the cocoon. They escape from the
free end of the egg case by the separation of the two “ lips,”
which at first, owing to their elasticity, were closed.
Hatschek supposes a Criodrilus to lay several cocoons,
because the number of worms was very small in comparison
with the cases which he found. I placed a Criodrilus amongst
the roots of Sium latifolium, and in a few days found two
quite transparent, and therefore fresh, cocoons. It appears to
me, therefore, that a Criodrilus will lay two cocoons, in cor-
respondence with the number of the sperm ducts. It is natural
that more cocoons than worms should be found, since empty
cocoons appear throughout the year attached amongst the
roots; one sometimes finds old, black, very much frayed co-
coons in certain places by thousands ; of freshly laid cocoons,
on the contrary, I have never collected more than double the
number relatively to the mature worms.
Habits. — In isolated branches of large rivers, e.g. the
Danube, as well as in flowing streams with muddy beds, there
are places where the bottom is very nitrogenous owing to the
decomposition of organic matter. In such places there are
usually many aquatic plants with dense roots, which (at any rate
here in Buda-Pesth, in the streams flowing into the Danube)
are met with in great abundance. Amongst these plants I
found a very large quantity of Sium latifolium, L., the
favourite plant of Criodrilus.
If these plants with their roots are taken out in the spring,
and the “covert” carefully examined, one finds the long
spindle-shaped cocoons and Criodrili engaged in egg-laying,
so closely interlaced with the roots that they can only be
separated with difficulty. The egg cases are at first sight so
very like the Enteromorpha, that young botanists might dispute
as to whether they are of vegetable or animal origin. It is
only during the breeding season that the worms are to be
found amongst the roots, where copulation and egg-laying
takes place. After the completion of these operations they
return to the mud, where their genital organs commence to
OBSERVATIONS ON CRIODRILUS LACUUM. 559
degenerate. I have never been able to study the copulation,
though I have looked at many worms. The swellings, around
and in front of the male genital pore, are, however, so very
swollen during the breeding season, and secrete so much mucus,
that I presume the copulation takes place as in the Lumbri-
cine. The worms found in the mud are very active, they
burrow deep into the mud; I have even met them at a clay
bottom, wherever the penetration of the water through the
deeper layers renders their passage possible. In very shallow
water, areas regularly and finely perforated are to be seen at
the sides and bottom of the channel, which disclose their
presence ; these perforated places can frequently be used as a
guide to their discovery. They only live scattered over a terri-
tory: as they can swim in a peculiar serpentine way they wander
to different places, and settle where the necessaries of their life
are present. Their food consists of rotting and decaying
vegetable matter, which they swallow mixed with mud. ‘Their
size varies according to their habitat and local circumstances,
as the statements of other observers affirm. However, even
under the same circumstances, very great differences in size
exist, so that, I think, in the first place individuality, and in
the second place environment must be considered as factors
in their varying size. .
In the economy of nature they appear to do good service by
their destruction of organic matter ; their feces, as in the case
of Earthworms in general, increases the goodness of the mud, as
is proved by the settlement of many plants in the places where
Criodrilus lives. The mud of such a bottom is very rich, and
on the overflowing of the stream it will be carried over the
fields where it is of further use for the nourishment of plants.
In winter these worms burrow very deep in the mud, so that
one can dig them out only from very great depths. Their
tenacity of life is great, yet after this season they are very much
changed. In winter they soon perish in tanks with pure water,
but in autumn they can be kept for aweek. In the tanks they
twine themselves into a knot and are then very difficult to
separate. Their power of regeneration is astonishing. A
560 DR. L. ORLEY.
worm, cut through the middle, forms a new tail with shortened
somites. In autumn more worms with regenerated tails are
found than in the spring. Once I found, in October, out of
fifty specimens, thirty with regenerated tails. The tail is very
brittle, and the reason is very likely to be found in the irregular
arrangement of the muscle-bundles.
In company with Criodrilus there lives a very interesting
Earthworm, Allolobophora dubiosa, Orley, which has
nearly the same habits.
Amongst the Hirudinea, species of Aulostoma and
Nephelis are their greatest enemies ; these swallow three or
four Criodrili at a time.
[For the explanation of figures 1 to 8, Plate XXXVIII,
illustrating Dr. Orley’s paper, see p. 570.]
STUDIES ON BARTHWORMS, 561
Studies on Earthworms.
No. III. Criodrilus lacuum, Hoffmeister.
By
William Blaxland Benham, B.Sc.,
Demonstrator in the Zoological Laboratory of University College, London.
With Plate XXXVIII, figs. 9 to 19.
Tnanxs to the kindness of Dr. Orley, who, at Professor Ray
Lankester’s request, sent him a bottle containing a large
number of Criodrilus preserved in spirit, and including both
sexually mature and young specimens, as well as cocoons, I[
have been enabled to make a study of this interesting worm.
The specimens are all in a good state of preservation, and I
have been able to add several new facts concerning its anatomy.
This is the first time that figures illustrating the general
anatomy of Criodrilus have been published. Hoffmeister! gives
a coloured figure of the worm, and of the cocoon, showing
their natural size and appearance, but with no details as to
sete, pores, &c.; Vejdovsky* has already published excellent
figures of various portions or organs of the worm; e.g. the
ovary, nephridial funnel, sete, transverse section of the body,
so that I have not repeated these. Dr. Orley? added drawings
of the prostomium, as well as of that of another worm which
he described as Criodrilus dubiosus; but in his paper,
published in the present number of this Journal, he makes no
1 © Die bis jetzt bekannt. Art. aus d. Fam.d. Regenwiirmer,’ Brunswick, 1845.
2 «Systeme und Morph. d. Oligocheten,’ Prag., 1884.
3 * Mathemat.u.Termeszt.tudomanyi K6zlemenyek,’ Budapest, Bd. 16, 1881.
562 WILLIAM BLAXLAND BENHAM.
reference to this worm. He, however, mentions Allolobo-
phora dubiosa as occurring with C. tacuum, so that, pre-
sumably, they are one and the same animal. But with all
these figures no general view of the worm has been given.
My thanks are due to Professor Ray Lankester, not only for
these worms, but also for allowing me to translate Dr. Orley’s
paper, so that I could corroborate or comment on his observa-
tions, and fill in details which he has left untouched. I am
quite aware that a great deal more still remains to be done in
reference to the anatomy and histology of Criodrilus, but I
think the following, taken with the description of the previous
observers, forms a fairly complete account of its anatomy.
External Characters.—I have nothing to add to Orley’s
statements as to the length and number of somites of the worm ;
my specimens are all preserved in strong spirit, and are there-
fore greatly contracted ; they are much coiled and twisted and
had to be soaked in weak alcohol before they could be con-
veniently dissected. A deep groove traverses the dorsal surface
posterior to somite 1; the ventral surface is rounded, and the
sides are more or less vertical (Pl. XX XVIII, fig. 12).
The prostomium is distinct, and its terminal pore has
been figured by Vejdovsky (loc. cit., pl. xin, fig. 12). The
anterior somites are longer than the posterior ones, and are not
so prominently quadrangular in section. On the ventral surface
of somites 1X, X, XI, XII, and x11, there are prominent rounded
papilla, in which the ventral sete are inserted.
The structure of the epidermis is to a certain extent figured
by Vejdovsky (loc. cit., pl. xiv, fig. 3). It consists of narrow
columnar cells with oval nuclei; their inner ends seem to
diverge and between them are seen small rounded cells with
rounded nuclei (Pl. XXXVIII, fig. 17, c.), which Vejdovsky
considers as young epiderm cells. Goblet cells are very rare;
they are narrow cells filled with granular matter, with the
protoplasm and nucleus at the imner ends. As the worm
lives in water the necessity for secreting mucus would not be
so great as in Harthworms, properly so-called, and hence the
mucous cells are few and far between. The capillary loops of
STUDIES ON EARTHWORMS. 563
the blood-vessels pass between the cells of the epidermis
(fig. 17, d), as in the Leech, and as Beddard has shown to be
the case in Perionyx and in Pericheta.
The longitudinal muscles are arranged irregularly, as in
Microcheta, Allolobophora, and others. Connective
tissue is abundant, and forms a fairly thick layer between
the muscular layer and the coelomic epithelium.
Previous writers have denied the existence of a clitellum ;
even Orley, who expressly looked for it, says that he has found
no trace of it; yet in all my specimens, which are sexually
mature, a considerable difference in appearance is noticeable
behind somite xv, and extending to about somite xtvi1. The
worm is here nearly cylindrical, though slightly concave on the
ventral surface, where the intersegmental grooves are not dis~
tinctly marked, but tend to run into one another across the
middle line as shown in fig. 10. The colour, at any rate in
spirit specimens, is rather darker over the dorsal and lateral
surfaces of this region than elsewhere. Noticing this, I cut a
series of transverse sections through the body, and I then
found that behind the somite xv the epidermis gradually
changed its character.
In addition to the columnar cells forming the epidermis of the
general surface, a layer of elongated, club-shaped cells, of
various lengths, is present (fig. 18, c), so that the epidermis is
here some four or five times deeper than elsewhere, and deeper
at the sides than on the dorsal surface. These cells have avery
similar appearance to those in the clitellum of Lumbricus
aud Microcheta, though they differ slightly in detail. Each
cell is filled with numerous highly refracting, small spherical
globules, and the protoplasm with the nucleus is confined,
apparently, to the inner, swollen end of the cell. As the cells
vary in length, the appearance presented is that of three or
four layers of such cells, as in Lumbricus; but in the latter
worm these club-shaped cells contain a granular substance,
and the rounded, refracting globules are confined to narrow,
elongated cells, intermediate in length between the club-
shaped and columnar cells and which are absent in Criodrilus,
564 WILLIAM BLAXLAND BENHAM.
Another point of difference is presented in the absence of the
strands of connective tissue, which in Lumbricus separate the
club-shaped cells into more or less distinct groups. I think that
there can be no doubt that the clitellum is present; but as it
commences and ends gradually, and since, from Orley’s remarks
and from Hoffmeister’s drawing, there is no difference in
colour in the living worm, it may easily be overlooked in this
condition.
The anus is situated quite dorsally (fig. 11), on an enlarged
somite, which Vejdovsky considers as representing some seven
or eight fused somites, as indicated by the ganglionic swellings
figured in pl. x, fig. 21, of his work.
The pore of the sperm-duct is placed on a large hemispherical
papilla, or swelling, on somite xv, between the ventral and
dorsal sete. which Orley speaks of as “ der Hof,” and which I
have translated as “areola.” It is, in the sexually mature
worm, very conspicuous, and has caused, in spirit specimens,
the lateral swelling shown in Pl. XX XVIII, figs. 9, 10.
The pore of the oviduct is similarly placed in somite xiv,
but on a much less prominent papilla. Both these pores are
visible from the side (fig. 13); and near them are usually one
or more white spermatophores. These are fully described in
the preceding paper, but whereas Orley states that they are
generally fixed close to the ventral setz, the specimens exa-
mined by me show them nearer the dorsal sete ; at the same
time I do not intend by this, nor by my figure, that it should
be inferred that Orley is in error: he has had much greater
opportunity for observation than I have, and my figure was
drawn some weeks before I saw his paper.
I have been unable to see the nephridia pores, and there are
no dorsal pores.
The four couples of setz are set at the corners of the animal, as
shown in fig. 11, and are perfectly evident throughout the body,
including the clitellum. They are usually broken off short, so
that I was unable to extract them; but in sections they are seen
to have the ordinary shape (Vejdovsky, pl. xiii, fig. 13).
Internal anatomy.—The alimentary tract differs from
STUDIES ON EARTHWORMS. 565
that of other earth-worms, with the exception of Pontodri-
lus, in the absence of a gizzard.
The pharynx extends to the hinder boundary of somite 1v
(fig. 14), the walls are very muscular, and the usual radiating
muscles pass to the body wall, some going as far back as somite
vi. In transverse sections I found numerous glandular-looking
cells amongst the muscles of the dorsal and lateral wall, but I
was unable to find any duct leading to the lumen of the
pharynx. There are similar groups of cells in the anterior
somites, through which the cesophagus passes ; these lie on each
side of the subintestinal blood-vessel, but I could find no duct.
The cesophagus is a narrow, simple tube, the walls of which
are fairly thick and very vascular. In somite x11 the ceso-
phagus enlarges, and in somites x1v to xvi the diameter is
some three or four times greater than in front. This “crop”
has a whiter appearance, due to its thicker muscular walls,
than the rest of the cesophagus; it is deeply constricted as it
passes through the septa, and the wall is greatly folded in-
ternally. I almost expected to find that this was a gizzard,
but the structure is quite the same as that of the cesophagus.
In the nineteenth somite the crop narrows and becomes the
intestine, the walls of which are fairly thin, so that the dark
food-material is seen through.
Vejdovsky states that there is no typhlosole, but on slitting
open the intestine along one side, and examining its interior,
a moderate-sized typhlosole is seen on the dorsal wall.
Series of sections confirmed this observation, and showed that
the epithelium covering this in-pushed dorsal wall differs
somewhat from the rest of the lining in that the cells are
here longer and more regular in size. The typhlosole then
is present, and init a small typhlosolar vessel or irregular
blood space, into which vessels from the intestine wall enter,
and from which small vessels pass vertically into the dorsal
blood trunk, just as is the case with Lumbricus. How far
back the typhlosole extends I am unable to say.
' Perrier, “ Etudes sur l’organisation des Lomb. terrestres,” ‘ Arch.
de Zool. Exper. et Gen.,’ ix, 1881.
566 WILLIAM BLAXLAND BENHAM.
The absence ofa gizzard, bothin Criodrilus and in Ponto-
drilus, is probably related to the soft nature of their food-
material. Both are aquatic in habit. Pontodrilus, as
Perrier tells us, lives on the seashore, and its food consists of
decaying vegetable matter thrown up by the sea. Criodrilus
lives entirely in the water, and obtains its food, according to
Orley, by swallowing the mud which contains decomposing
vegetable matter. In both cases the food is soft, and already
more or less finely divided, and can be easily digested, so that
the necessity for a gizzard does not exist: in Lumbricus and
other worms, however, which live on land and burrow and
swallow the hard soil, some crushing apparatus is needed before
the digestive fluid secreted by the wall of the intestine can act
on the food.
The vascular system I have not traced to any extent.
The dorsal blood-trunk is large, and has the usual ampullate
appearance up to somite xv. In the next preceding somite it
is bent slightly to one side, and gradually gets narrower till it
divides up on the wall of the pharynx. In each of the somites
vil to x1 a pair of large and long moniliform hearts unite the
dorsal to the ventral trunk; and there are lateral vessels in
each of the somites posterior to the hearts.
In the neighbourhood of the anus the dorsal trunk divides
into two (Vejdovsky; pl. xiv). A subneural vessel is present
and a typhlosolar vessel, but neither latero-neural nor intes-
tino-tegumentary vessels exist.
The nervous system presents no points of difference from
the usual arrangement. The three “ great fibres” are present.
The nephridia are not present in front of somite x11.
A series of sections confirmed the results derived from
dissection. In and behind this somite they are large and
fairly conspicuous organs, having a slight muscular vesi-
cular portion. Vejdovsky states that they open exteriorly
in front of the ventral sete: he also figures a nephridial
funnel (pl. xiii, 21), which somewhat resembles that of
Lumbricus.
Pontodrilus agrees with Criodrilus in that there are no
STUDIES ON EARTHWORMS. 567
nephridia in the anterior somites, the first nephridium being
apparently in somite x1v, so that both these approach the
Limicole in having no nephridia in those somites in which the
spermathecze and ciliated rosettes lie, though they are present
in the same somites with the oviduct and the posterior part of
the sperm-duct.
The Genital Organs.—I have succeeded in finding all the
usual organs connected with the genital apparatus, with the
exception of spermathece. The seminal reservoirs or sperm
sacs are constructed on the plan of Allolobophora, and not
on that of Lumbricus, as Orley seems to indicate, since there
is no median portion connecting the sacs below the intestine
(fig. 15). The worms which I dissected are sexually mature,
one of them having spermatophores attached to somite XIV.
There are four pairs of pouches, as in Allolobophora,' one
on each side of each of the somites 1x, x, x1, and x11; they vary
in size in these somites, and in different individuals. Each is
an irregular loose mass, which is easily torn on opening the
worm, and in sections the lobation is seen to be carried to a
great extent, the cavity of the sac being subdivided by long,
narrow inpushings of the wall of the sac, whilst loose separate
masses of developing spermatozoa are seen in the somites in
which the reservoirs lie. Those in somites 1x and x are formed
as anteriorly directed saclike outpushings of the hinder septa
of these somites, whilst those in somites x1 and x1I are pos-
terior outgrowths of the anterior septa of these somites. Hach
is connected to a septum by a short pedicle (Pl. XX XVIII,
fig. 15, e! to e*).
The testes (which Orley states lie in somites x1 and x11)
are in reality in somites x and x1, attached to the anterior
septa, very close to the ventral body wall, near the nerve cord
(fig. 15, a). They have a digitate form, like the testis of
A llolobophora turgida, figured by Bergh.’ (Pl. XXX VIII,
fig. 16). Owing to their deep position they are very difficult to
1 R.S. Bergh, “ Untersuch. iiberd. Bau u.d. Entwickl. d. Geschlectsorgane
d. Regenwiirmer,” ‘Zeit. fiir wiss, Zool.,’ 1886, p, 303.
2 Thid., fig. 1.
VOL, XXVII, PART 4,——NEW SER. RR
568 WILLIAM BLAXLAND BENHAM.
find at first, but my dissections are confirmed by transverse
sections.
Close behind each testis is a ciliated rosette, lying,
therefore, in somites x and x1, and close to the posterior
septum of the somite. (Orley wrongly states that they are
attached to the anterior septum of somites x1 and x11, into
which they project.)
The sperm-ducts from the two ciliated rosettes of one side
unite at the level of the septum behind somite x1, and the
single duct passes to somite xv, embedded in the connective
tissue which exists between the coelomic epithelium and the
longitudinal muscles of the body wall; hence it is practically
impossible to trace it except by means of sections, unless it
happen to be filled with spermatozoa, when it will appear
whiter than the surrounding tissue. In somite xv is a large
and conspicuous hemispherical gland, which may be called a
prostate; the sperm-duct passes to the dorsal surface of this
gland, dips down through its mass and opens to the exterior by
the pore mentioned above, which is situated on a prominent
rounded papilla, which seems to be merely the outer half of
the prostate. This gland itself consists of cells similar to
those forming the epidermis of the clitellum, and quite con-
tinuous with them; the muscular layers of the body wall are
here thin, and pass over the inner surface of the prostate, so
that the gland appears to be formed merely by an hemispherical
thickening of the epidermis over this area.
The ovary is a flattened rounded disc attached to the
anterior septum of somite x111, close to the nerve cord (fig. 15,
f). It resembles the ovary of Perichzta in shape, and is
without the tail-like prolongation of the ovary of Lumbricus
(fig. 19). It is figured in Vejdovsky’s work,! but I have added
a figure here, as he does not show the delicate membrane sur-
rounding the organ.
The ovisac (which seems to be a better name than Bergh’s
“receptaculum ovorum,” since the word “ receptaculum ”
has been applied to a spermatheca) is a botryoidal sac-like
1 Loc. cit.; pl. xiii, fig. 23.
STUDIES ON EARTHWORMS. 569
protrusion of the posterior septum of somite x11, and thus hes
in somite x1v. It is filled with ripe ova and has a goodly
supply of blood capillaries on its wall. It is very conspicuous
in the specimens dissected by me, much more so than the
ovary, for which I should probably have mistaken it had not
Bergh’s paper appeared ;! and it is curious that Orley makes
10 mention of it.
The funnel of the oviduct (fig. 15, g) projects into somite
xu, close to the point where the ovisac is attached; and the
edge of the funnel is more prominent than is usual. The
external pore has already been mentioned, as being on somite
xiv (fig. 10, c).
Orley states that the spermathece “appear to open to the
exterior between the somites 1x and x, and x and x1.” I can
find no trace of spermathecze, though I have searched for them
in some half a dozen specimens, of various stages of maturity ;
nor is any trace of them presented in a series of sections
through this region of the body. I must therefore conclude
that this is an error of observation on his part; he says no
more of them than the above quotation. Can he have mis-
taken the ciliated rosettes for these organs, and mistaken the
testes for the rosettes? It seems to me quite probable from
his description of the relation of these structures that such is
the case ; a portion of a ciliated rosette, removed, teased, and
examined, would show mature spermatozoa, which might lead
an observer to conclude that he was dealing with a sperma-
theca. Again, the shape of the testes, as seen with a lens,
might without difficulty be mistaken for ciliated rosettes,
which he places in the position occupied by the testes, though
he has placed these in the wrong somites.
The cocoon and spermatophore are so fully described
and figured by Orley, that I have nothing to add to his
description of these structures.
His interesting observations on the habits of Criodrilus
‘ It is probable, as Mr. Beddard has remarked in a recent number of the
‘Proc. Zool. Soc.,’ that the structure figured and described by me as the
ovary of Microcheta (see this Journal, vols. xxvi and xxvii) is really
the ‘‘ ovisac ;” and that I have overlooked the true gonad.
570 WILLIAM BLAXLAND BENHAM.
will, I hope, enable this form to be discovered in England
and similar observations on the habits of other forms are a
great desideratum.
Parasites of Criodrilus.——My attention was first at-
tracted to certain curious elongated structures attached to the
ovary, and I found them afterwards in various parts of the
body. These are narrow bodies, about one tenth of an inch in
length, and of a white colour (in spirit). Each is invested by
a well-defined cuticle, which encloses a very granular dark
medullary protoplasm, in which is a clearer space, probably
the nucleus. The shape varies to a great extent ; some consist
of an elongated ovoid body drawn out at each end into a much
narrower portion ; others are just the reverse, consisting of two
ovoid swellings connected by a narrower portion.
They are apparently Gregarine, which have been killed in
various states of englenoid movement, such as is exhibited by
Monocystis lumbrici; the worms had been killed in cor-
rosive sublimate, judging from the white deposit on their
surface, and this would cause the various states of movement
to be fixed. At one end the cuticle is thickened and presents
somewhat the appearance figured by Professor Lankester in
vol. 3 of this Journal, Pl. VII, for M. aphrodite.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXVIII,
Illustrating Dr. Orley’s Paper “ Observations on Criodrilus
lacuum,” figs. 1 to 8, and Mr. Benham’s Paper “ Studies
on Karthworms,” figs. 9 to 19.
Criodrilus lacuum, Hoffmeister.
Fic. 1.—Cocoon of Criodrilus lacuum. Natural size. a. The end by
which it is attached. 4%. The free end.
Fie. 2.—The attachable end more highly magnified. (x 300.)
STUDIES ON BARTHWORMS. EL
Fie. 3.—The free end more highly magnified. (x 300.)
Fic. 4.—A transverse section through the middle portion of the wall of
the cocoon. (xX 300.) a. Outer layer. 4. Middle layer. c. Inner layer.
Fic. 5.—A detached piece of the middle layer. (x 800.)
Fic, 6.—Strata of the inner layer. (x 300.)
Fie. 7.—A spermatophore. (x 60.)
Fic. 8.—Spermatozoa from the spermatophore. (x 500.)
Fic. 9.—The anterior extremity of the worm viewed from above. (x 2,
spirit specimen.) a. The prostomium. 4, The dorsal sete. c. Enlargement
occupying somites xIv to xvitl, due to the large papille on the ventral sur-
face. d. The clitellum., Behind somite xiv the quadrangular shape of the
worm is shown.
Fic. 10.—The same worm from below. a. The prostomium. 4%. The
mouth. c¢. The pore of the oviduct. d. The pore of the sperm-duct, situated
on a large rounded swelling causing the enlargement in this region. e. The
ventral sete. /. The clitellum.
Fic. 11.—The last few somites of the body, showing :—a. The anus,
situated dorsally. 4. The region regarded by Vejdovsky as representing seven
or eight fused somites.
Fie. 12.—A diagrammatic outline of a section through the body in the
posterior region of the body, showing its quadrangular shape, with the dorsal
sete (a) and the ventral sete (4) placed at the corners.
Fic. 18.—The side of the body, showing a spermatophore (a) attached to
somite xIv. 4. dorsal sete. c. The ventral sete. d. The sperm-pore, on its
enlarged papilla. e. The ovipore.
Fie. 14.—General view of the anatomy of Criodrilus when opened in the
usual way. (x 2.) a@. The pharynx. 4. The esophagus, swelling out at c
to form a strong muscular crop. d. The intestine. e. The dorsal blood-
vessel. ff. The lateral hearts. gy. g. The seminal reservoirs. /. The ovary.
&. The ovisac (Bergh’s “receptaculum ovorum”). 7. The hemispherical
glandular swelling or prostate around the terminal portion of the sperm-duct.
m. Prostomium, 2. Suprapharyngeal ganglia. o. The nephridia.
Fic. 15.—The genital organs of the left side greatly enlarged. A portion
of the oesophagus is represented on the right of the figure. a@.a'. The two
testes. 4, d’. The ciliated rosettes. c. The sperm-duct, which dips into the
hemispherical prostate, d. The seminal reservoirs, ¢!, ¢°, ¢3, e4, are represented
as relatively rather smaller than their true size; they are seen to be attached to
the various septa. /. The ovary. The septum between the somites x11 and
X1v is turned back so as to show the funnel of the oviduct, gy, and the nephri-
dial funnel, 7. 4. The ovisac. 4%. Nephridium.
Fic. 16.—A testis attached to the septum.
bye STUDIES ON EARTHWORMS.
Fic. 17.—A small portion of a section through the epidermis, to show a
capillary loop, d, passing between the columnar cells, 2, and the small
cells, c. a. The cuticle. e. The circular muscles. .
Fic. 18.—A portion of the epidermis from somite xvIII, in order to show
its clitellar structure. a. Cuticle. 6. Columnar epithelialcells. c. Hlongated
club-shaped clitellar cells. d. Circular muscles.
Fic. 19.—An ovary.
NOTES ON THE CHROMATOLOGY OF ANTHEA CEREUS. 573
Notes on the Chromatology of Anthea cereus.
By
Cc. A. Mae Munn, M.A., M.D.
With Plates XXXIX and XL.
Tue colouring matters of Anthea cereus were first
examined by Sorby,! who found several present in this
Actinia. Among others he found chlorofucin, the bands
of which had been observed by Mr. Charles Horner, and the
position of which led Mr. Horner to think that the supposed
chlorophyll was different to that of land plants. Sorby had
previously found chlorofucin in fresh-water algze and sub-
sequently in Fucus and other olive marine alge; and in
his paper on “ Comparative Vegetable Chromatology” he
gave directions for its separation from other pigments. Prof.
Lankester, in the list of chlorophyll-containing animals in
the English edition of Sachs’s ‘ Botany,’ includes Anthea
cereus and puts “chlorofucin” after it, thus accepting
Sorby’s statements.
Among those animals which have been proved to contain
symbiotic unicellular alge Anthea is now, I believe, included ;*
and it becomes of interest to find out whether chlorofucin is
due to the presence of these symbiotic algze or whether it is a
pigment belonging intrinsically to the animal; whether, also,
the other colouring matters associated with the chlorofucin
1 «Proc. Roy. Soc.,”? No. 146, vol. xxi, 1873, p. 454.
2 Hertwig, O. and R., “ Die Actinien,” ‘ Jena’ische Zeitschrift. f. Naturwis.,’
Bad. xiii, 1879, S. 495—500; and Geddes, ‘ Proc. Roy. Soc. Hdin.,’ vol. xi,
188]—1882.
574 Cc. A. MAC MUNN.
belong to the animai or the alge. I have already! proved this
point almost completely, as I found that in Anthea cereus,
in Bunodes Ballii, and Sagartia Bellis, “yellow cells,”
or symbiotic alge, are present, that these animals all contain
chlorofucin, all contain the same accompanying colouring
matters, and that these colouring matters are evidently due to
the “yellow cells” with which the tentacles are stuffed ; for
there is no essential difference in the spectra of the solutions of
the tentacles in which the colouring matters are derived entirely
from the “ yellow cells ” and those obtainable from other parts
of the Actinia.
Moreover, I have also proved that in anemones possessing
yellow cells there is more or less suppression of the respiratory
proteids found in other Actiniz.
But I had not repeated Sorby’s experiments in which he
applied Stokes’s “ fractional” method for the separation of the
chlorofucin from the other colouring matters. In the present
paper I have given the results of this examination, and, as
will be seen, the statements of Sorby have been verified. This
is of importance, as Krukenberg? has omitted to mention in the
account of his experiments the results arrived -at by Sorby,
although, as I shall show, he had evidently chlorofucin before
him in some of the solutions whose spectra he has mapped.
In the paper referred to above’ I haveshown that the mixture of
colouring matters obtained from the Actiniz therein mentioned
contain chlorofucin, and that the bands of this correspond to
the chlorofucin bands in a similar solution of Fucus serratus.
Sorby has figured in a diagram the bands of this pigment, but he
does not give their wave-length measurements, and only figures
the dominant bands of “ blue” and “ yellow chlorophyll” in
the same diagram for the sake of comparison ; consequently
some confusion is caused when one endeavours to find out what
1
6 Ae
had
arr
Mel
oes
7
71
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 605
The Relation of the Nemertea to the
Vertebrata.
By
A. A. W. Hubrecht,
Professor in Utrecht.
With Plate XLII.!
In venturing at the close of my Report on the Nemertea,
collected by H.M.S. “Challenger,” to leave the region of
demonstrated facts and actual observations, and to enter upon
that of speculation and suggestion, I gladly availed myself of
the permission for so doing granted to me by the editor, Mr.
John Murray. I thought it necessary to ask for that permis-
sion, because general speculations on the ancestry of the
Chordata hardly appeared to me to fit into the framework of
those Reports. My desire in this case to deviate from a rule
which I held to be salutary, was due to the fact that of late
these speculations have been conducted along very varying
channels, an entirely new one having only very lately been
opened by Bateson’s important series of papers on Balano-
glossus. An attempt to give more depth to one of these
channels, and thus to lead into it the attention of a greater
number of my fellow-workers, especially commended itself to
me, since it was my conviction that the lines laid down by
myself in former publications derived considerable support
from the “ Challenger ” material, and were thus entitled to a
renewed and full consideration.
1 Published by permission of the editor of the ‘Zoology of the Challenger
Expedition,’ Mr. John Murray, F.R.S..
606 A, A. W. HUBRECHT.
I would formulate the proposition, to the further develop-
ment of which this memoir is to be devoted, as follows:
More than any other class of invertebrate animals,
the Nemertea have preserved in their organisation
traces of such features as must have been character-
istic of those animal forms, by which a transition
has been gradually brought about from the archi-
celous Diploblastic (Celenterate) type to those
enterocelous Triploblastica, that have afterwards
developed into the Chordata (Urochorda, Hemi-
chorda, Cephalochorda, and Vertebrata).
It will be seen that this statement excludes the idea of any
direct ancestral relations between Nemertea and Chordata.
If any such relation were proposed, it might with good reason
be asked—considering the very extensive variation which is
met with amongst Nemertea—which species or which genus
was more particularly pointed to. The question in itself con-
demns the proposition which leads to it.
It will, moreover, be seen that this statement accepts the.
outcome of Bateson’s researches and speculations, in so far as
the points of agreement between Balanoglossus and Am-
phioxus are fully recognised. A provisional link between
these two, and an arrangement of Balanoglossus as amongst
the Chordata, appears to be quite as justifiable as the elevation
of the Urochorda to their new dignity in zoological classifi-
cation.
There is, however, a great difference between looking at
Balanoglossus as a low type amongst the Chordata (in
which I fully agree with Bateson) and rejecting the signifi-
cance of the Nemertean type as one of transition in the way
above indicated.
There is no doubt that the Nemertea represent a more primi-
tive phase than the Enteropneusta (Hemichorda). They have
no gill-slits ; but their nervous system shows certain unexpected
analogies with that of the higher Chordata of more intrinsic
value than those that obtain between Balanoglossus and
the Chordata in general. Also for the important question,
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 607
which is so vital in any consideration of the ancestry of the
Vertebrates, viz. the origin of metameric segmentation, it
appears to me that the Nemertea offer points very worthy of
consideration. The question of the proboscis and its sheath,
as comparable to hypophysis and notochord was fully treated
by me in another paper,! and will here only be very briefly
touched upon. In my opinion, this comparison is all the more
forced upon us, now that in other respects (nervous system, &c.)
new evidence of genetic relationship is here brought forward.
The first point I wish to consider is that of metameric seg-
mentation. It has been specially treated of late years by
various authors of renown, with whom I do not wish to enter
at this moment into any lengthy controversy, but will briefly
state what may be gathered for the theory in general, from
a careful consideration of the incipient metamery of the
Nemertea.
If we start from a more or less radiate ancestor of the
earliest diploblastic type, in which neither a radial nor a serial
repetition of organs or organ systems has yet come about, and
which may indifferently be considered to resemble either a
more flattened Trichoplax or a more spherical gastrula, we
may assume that in the course of the development of other
internal organs (towards the formation of which the secondary
accumulation of cells between the two primary layers often so
largely contributes) the radial symmetry may either be further
accentuated or may be replaced by a tendency towards bilateral
symmetry. In the latter case we are inclined to ascribe the
first impulse towards this bilateral symmetry to a preference,
which slowly establishes itself in the animal mechanism, for
moving in one direction rather than in any other, i.e. for
generally stretching forward, when moving about, one particular
portion of the body.
One impulse of this sort will suffice to lead us to understand,
or rather to deduce, a very considerable number of conse-
quences, which cannot fail to make their appearance under the
1 “On the Ancestral Forms of the Chordata,” ‘ Quart. Journ. Micr, Sci.,’
vol, xxiii, 1883.
608 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
influence of natural selection acting upon the organisms that
have inherited this tendency in different degrees. Thus we
may understand the narrowing and lengthening of an animal
that moves in one direction in preference to any other; and
similarly the development in the nervous system of a centrali-
sation not far away from the anterior extremity.
All this has already been stated by Balfour in clearer terms
in his ‘ Comparative Embryology’ (vol. ii, pp. 808, 311), where
he describes the gradual steps by which a radiate medusa-like
animal may have passed into a bilateral worm-like form, with
two longitudinal nerve-stems, which are regarded by Balfour
as the stretched nerve-ring of the Medusa.
I fully endorse these views ; only, with respect to the nervous
system, I hold it to be safer to leave out of comparison the
already specialised nerve-ring of the Medusa, and rather to go
back to the Coelenterate nervous system as primitive as that of
the Actinia, where the plexus, both of the epiblast and the
hypoblast, with an increase in density in the region of the
mouth and the tentacles, may be said to be the fair representa-
tive of one of the lowest starting points. In this the plexiform
arrangement predominates.
Now we find in all the lower invertebrates various though
distinct nerve tracts that are being specialised in this plexiform
nerve-tissue according to the modes of motion of the animal,
and according to the general shape of the body.
Thus in the Meduse, which move about in the water by
annular contractions of the lower portion of the bell-shaped
body, one of the nerve-rings already alluded to was demon-
strated by the Hertwigs to innervate the musculature by which
this is brought about.
In the Ctenophora the nerve system is less satisfactorily
known, but still Lang! does not hesitate to bring them into
genetic relationship with the Polyclada. Among the latter,
Gunda, with its two longitudinal lateral stems, may be looked
upon as an extreme term in this series.
1 A. Lang, ‘Monographie der Polycladen,’ Leipzig, 1884.
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 609
Another series may indeed be supposed to have derived
longitudinal stems from a ring which became extended to form
lateral cords, as the animal passed from the radial to the
bilateral symmetry, in the way suggested by Balfour. Still,
even in this case, a nerve-plexus may be expected to be coex-
istent with or to have preceded the nerve-ring. The longitu-
dinal stems originating from the anterior thickenings of the
plexus that innervate the sense organs and the tip of the head
(specially sensitive in connection with the forwardly directed
movements of the body), would all the more probably be pre-
served and increase in development, as during this forward
movement they form a right and a left centre for the reception
of outward stimuli. In the same way those of the radially
arranged stems of the Polyclada that are parallel to the longi-
tudinal body-axis, and mark out right and left, are more
strongly developed than the others, presumably on account of
their importance in connection with the well-directed move-
ments of the body in response to external agents.
In the ancestral Mollusca I think we may assume with
great probability the presence of four longitudinal stems
—two latero-dorsal and two latero-ventral ones; in the ances-
tral forms of Annelids and Arthropods two, which have gra-
dually coalesced ventrally, as was first suggested by Gegenbaur.
Again, in Nematodes differently situated longitudinal stems in
what was originally a uniform plexus are preserved ; whereas
in ancestral Nemertea two lateral longitudinal trunks in the
plexus were undoubtedly characteristic features.
That one medio-dorsal stem in this plexus, in which all the
impressions made by outward agencies on both halves of the
body might be concentrated, and from whence the correspond-
ing movements might be regulated, will more fully answer the
purpose than two lateral stems, however they may be united
by an intervening plexus, is a priori probable, and would
explain the first impulse towards the formation of such a
longitudinal concentration in the uniform plexus.
And when once such a dorso-median stem is present, in
addition to two lateral ones, a struggle for supremacy, presided
610 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
over by natural selection, may lead to a diminution of the
lateral stems, and to an increase of the dorso-median one.
This, in my opinion, as will be more fully developed below,
was the case in the ancestors of the Chordata, traces of this
struggle and of the competing structural elements being duly
preserved.
If we suppose the bilateral symmetry to be established in
one of the lower representatives of the Metazoa, and the type
to goon increasing in length in the course of generations,
then this increase indeed exposes it to very different and per-
haps more numerous dangers and enemies than would
threaten it were the same bulk concentrated in a spherical or .
radial circumference. And if, even in the latter case, injuries
to the individual might prove fatal were it not provided with
strong powers of regeneration (cf. Star-fishes, Ophiurids,
Crinoids, &c.), still it needs no comment that, when bilateral
symmetry and increase in length so considerably enlarges the
surface which is open to attacks, and so enormously facilitates
the rupture of the individual, or the severing of parts by rapa-
cious enemies preying upon it, similar regenerative powers
are none the less required to insure the persistence of the
type.
These dangers, continually threatening the exist-
ence of the individuals, and thus injurious to the
species, counteracted as they are by regenerative pro-
cesses (power of reproduction of lost parts), I hold to be
at the base of all those cases of metamery in the
animal kingdom which do not fall under the head of
strobilation, the latter being comparatively rare with respect
to the former. Incipient metamery, once established by this
cause, may further differentiate in the most diverse directions
(heteronomous segmentation, &c.), even after the absolute
cessation of the causes that in the first instance have
provoked it.
The explanation has, moreover, the advantage of being
applicable to radial as well as to serial metamery.
These propositions must now be more fully developed. The
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 611
power of reproduction of lost parts comes, without doubt, under
the general laws of formation and growth. We find it even
in the lowest Protozoa. If the material which heredity has
accumulated, either in such a unicellular being or in the egg
of a Metazoon, and out of which the elements of the different
organ systems will gradually develop, is hereditarily so disposed
that a compensation for the loss of important parts is facili-
tated, this will, of course, constitute an advantage. Such a
compensation may, e.g. be obtained where the generative
products are developed in very many separate centra, and not
in one closed sac. Injury to the latter will, ceteris paribus,
be more fatal than an equivalent injury destroying one or more
of the former. The same holds good for diffused instead of
concentrated nervous centra, for the case of liver saccules to
the intestine, instead of one compact liver, for numerous aper-
tures and deferent ducts to the nephridial system instead of
one, &c. And all! this is still more evident when we have
before us a long, bilaterally symmetrical animal, which is easily
snapped in two. In this case it must be of pre-eminent impor-
tance, that the remaining halves, which may in their turn be
severed by the same cause into smaller parts, should possess
sufficient power of reproduction to repair the damage. Now, it
cannot be doubted that an equal distribution of the important
components of the organism (nervous centra, generative organs,
nephridia, intestinal appendages, &c.) throughout the whole
length of the animal meets this requirement. Any severed
portion will then be provided with these more important parts,
and will be more or less adapted for a separate and individual
existence.
The formation of a new mouth and of new brain-lobes in a
fragment of this description remains, of course, quite as won-
derful and inexplicable as before, but still we cannot fail to see
that such an arrangement as here indicated must somehow be
beneficial to the species, and that we need not stop short with
Bateson,’ when he says that “the repetition of various struc-
1 Bateson, “ The Ancestry of the Chordata,” ‘ Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’
vol. xxvi, pp. 545, 546, 1886,
612 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
tures is one of the chief factors in the composition of animal
forms: #) =. 431k The reason for their appearance is as yet
unknown, and the laws that control and modify them are
utterly obscure.” Obscurity is not exchanged for broad day-
light, but something is gained whev we can see that a growth
of the principal organ-systems in separate and more or less
independent batches, which in an elongated and bilaterally
symmetrical animal insensibly passes into the phenomenon of
incipient metamery, may be of the highest value for the per-
sistence of the species.
Now this is actually the way in which we find the important
organ-systems distributed in the lower Nemertea. And out of
this more irregular distribution a gradual metamery, in some
incipient, in others more complete, is seen to evolve within the
boundaries of the class. Even the nephridial system, in the
primitive forms provided with only one opening to the exterior,
participates in this tendency towards metamery, and acquires
a greater number of apertures, serially arranged in pairs,
thereby also tending towards a diminution of damage when
artificial division into two takes place in the nephridial region.
The metamery, the regular and serial repetition of parts, is
thus seen to be of great importance in aiding towards repair
after damage to a lengthened bilateral form, in the same way
as the radial repetition of parts facilitates repair in the Echino-
dermata. In both cases the destruction is only partial, the
other homonodynamic portions temporarily ministering, thanks
to their more independent relation to the injured region.
When the faculty of repair of damage, occasioned by the
severing of the animal into two or more portions, has in the
course of generations become more and more complete, it can
be readily understood that it becomes at the same time a defen-
sive instead of being only a curative process. An animal that
at the approach of danger can separate in two or more parts,
each of them capable of reproducing an entire new animal,
evades this danger very effectively by doing so; whereas
another that is attacked in the same way and does not possess
this faculty, is laid hold of, shaken about, and wholly or partly
RELATION OF THE NEMBRTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 613
swallowed. Soin the Nemertea there is indeed a very strong
faculty of spontaneous division combined with the faculty of
repair;! and anybody who has observed a fresh and living
Cerebratulus, with its extremely delicate sense of touch,
commence to rupture into two, in preference at the spot where
it was grasped with the forceps, cannot fail to see in this a
defensive action.
This mode of self-defence may in quite another respect be
useful to the species, because at the same time it serves for
propagation. Thus we see that the passage of this defensive
process to that of reproduction by fission is so gradual, that it
would be impossible to decide in every case what name should
properly be applied to it. It cannot well be denied that in all
probability ours is only a special case, in which the power of
reproducing the species by a process of fission, reaching down
as far as the unicellular ancestors, has come to be regulated
by other motor forces than growth, and—if it may not be called
voluntary fission—still may be regarded as sudden and spon-
taneous fission, brought about by external influences, of a
threatening nature to the further existence of the specimen.
This regulation is no doubt a consequence of selection. Schi-
zogony having once been established, it must have been further
beneficial to the species, on the grounds that were developed
above, that the internal organs should be present in multiple
numbers, and this having once come about it is easy to under-
stand that a regular, rigorously metamerous arrangement of
this multiple material, still more fully answers the same pur-
pose, and is gradually evolved under the influence of selection.
Thus we may be said to be able to follow the appearance of
metamery in a bilateral animal, along all the gradual steps by
which it is evolved, and many of these steps have remained
fixed and permanent in different Nemertean genera.
1 Both M‘Intosh and Barrois have observed and described very peculiar
cases of repair in Nemertea, where the head, brain, side-organs, &c., were
reproduced on a headless trunk-piece. These experiments are well worthy of
careful repetition. It may be that only those fragments in which a portion of
the cesophagus was retained were capable of repair of the head.
614 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
The last system that will participate in this metamery is the
muscular system, and a rash conclusion—such as is not rare
in these days of ontogenetic fetichism—might lead to the
rejection of the views concerning metamery here developed,
on the consideration that it is exactly the metamery of the
muscular system which appears first of all in the ontogenetic
development of Vertebrates. I will not circumstantially refute
this argument, but will only remark that in Polygordius
and other Chetopods, which are representatives of a group of
animals in which segmentation reaches such a very high degree
of perfection, the longitudinal muscular layer of the body-wall
is as yet continuous in the adult, and not divided into meta-
meric sections, as it is in certain Arthropods and in Vertebrates.
Now let us consider contractions of the inner muscular layer
of the Nemertea, the only layer that is common to all of them,
from Carinella to Cerebratulus and from Cephalothrix
to Pelagonemertes. This layer also corresponds with the
longitudinal muscular layer just alluded to of other lower
worms, such as Polygordius, and, as was noticed in our
paragraph on the muscular system, its contraction is some-
times very distinct in favorable sections.
We then see the contraction marked out as so many suc-
cessive blocks of contracted, thickened fibres, separated by
intervening parts of non-contracted fibrous tissue. The
sections demonstrate that the phenomenon persists through-
out the whole breadth of the animal, i.e. that successive
rings of contractile tissue alternate with intervening rings
in which no contraction is observed. This phenomenon is
thus in a certain degree comparable to an arrangement in
distinct myomeres.
It is not unimportant that it was especially noticed in the
fundamental muscular layer, and it may at the same time be
remarked that it appears, from what I have as yet been able
to observe myself, that the number of these rings in a given
length of the animal is the same, or a multiple of the number
of intestinal cca and transverse nerve-tracts in the plexus;
in other words, that the incipient metamery of the internal
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 615
organs is in a definite relation to these phenomena—which
might also deserve the name of incipient metamery—in the
muscular layers.
For the present the fact is, however, not yet definitely demon-
strated that these successive blocks are indeed present as such
in the living animal. The possibility is still open that they may
be waves of contraction which have been fixed at the moment
of the immersion of the animal in the preserving fluid. For
this reason I will not lay any undue weight on this observation.
The ideas concerning the origin of metamery here expressed,
and advocated for several years in my university lectures, differ
from those of Lang (loc. cit.) and Sedgwick,! in so far as
they do not recognise the primary importance of the so-called
ceelomic sacs—the paired archenteric diverticula of Amphioxus
—for the solution of this question.
The question of the Vertebrate ccelome, so full of obscurities
and difficulties, is purposely left out of consideration here, where
the relation to archicelous ancestral forms is discussed, and
where an attempt is made to show that it is indeed probable
that the impulse towards the establishment of metamery is due
to forces for which the archenteron was not the only, nor per-
haps the most important part of the organism to act upon.
Still more different are they from those advocated by Perrier?
and Cattaneo,> who have adhered to and extended the idea
already held by others, but by them most actively defended,
“that the metamery of Arthropods, Vertebrates, and a great
many Vermes, has originated out of the multiplication by
transverse fission of very simple primitive worms which
were not metamerous. The products of this transverse
fission remaining connected together have then formed a
chain of individuals, or a linear colony; later on the unity
of the chain has become more definitely established, the
single individuals at the same time becoming different both in
' A, Sedgwick, “On the Origin of Metameric Segmentation,’ ‘ Quart.
Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xxiv, p. 43, 1884.
? i. Perrier, ‘Les colonies animales,’ Paris, 1881.
3G. Cattaneo, ‘Le colonie lineari e la morfologia dei Molluscli,’ Milano,
1883.
VOL, XXVI1, PART 4,——NEW SER. UU
616 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
form and in function, and the foremost individual thus becom-
ing the head of the series. Each segment (metamere) thus
represents a reduced individual; a metameric (segmented)
animal is the result of the more or less complete fusion of
single individuals into an individual of higher order.”’
Emery, from whose paper! I have translated the foregoing
sentence, has very successfully combated these propositions.
This author, however, adheres to Lang’s views in ascribing to
the archenteric pouches, the “ gemmation” as Emery calls it
(loc. cit., p. 18) of the intestine, the most important and
initial significance for the first origin of metamery, “the sex-
ual glands and excretory canals being in relation to the
intestinal diverticula,” and following the lead. I have above
explained why I cannot adhere to this argumentation, which
brings the ccelome and the sacculated intestine too strongly
into the foreground, and why I rather suppose incipient
metamery to have been antecedent to either of these (e.g.
Carinella). On the other hand, many views contained in
Emery’s important paper coincide with my own. ‘Thus he
writes (loc. cit. p. 11), speaking of that interesting marine
Triclade, Gunda segmentata:
“The metamery of Gunda is thus manifestly the conse-
quence not of the ‘symbiotic’ fusion of a colony of equivalent
‘parts’ (meridi), but of the ‘autobiotic’ differentiation and
perfectioning of one ‘part’ (meride);” and further on (p. 15):
—‘“ When I consider the facility with which certain worms
break into one or more pieces even spontaneously, it appears
to me that this capacity for rupture may well have been the
origin of the reproductive purpose of transverse scission in
similar elongated organisms. The rupture, in the first instance
accidental, could have contributed to the more rapid multipli-
cation of the organism, being followed by the regeneration of
the parts that were deficient in the separate fragments. This
process of rupture might further have been so perfected that
the spot best adapted for rupture, with a view to the best con-
dition of the fragments, was prepared in advance. In the
" C. Emery, ‘ Colonie lineare e metameria,’ Napoli, 1883.
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 617
more perfect evolutional phases of the process, which are at
the same time those that have till now been more carefully
investigated, the new head is formed anteriorly to the rupture,
or at least its essential parts are pre-established.”
My own views emphasize the presence of a peculiar process
ef development of the internal organs, running parallel to this
predisposition for rupture in a particular spot—the spot which
will correspond to the outwardly visible demarcation between
the future segments. They thus go one step further—and, in
my opinion, a very essential step—in the attempt to explain
the origin of metamery in the lower Platyelminthes, these
bilateral descendants of radiate Coelenterata, and at the same
time predecessors of both Chordata and Appendiculata.’
This view of the origin of metamery also affords an explana-
tion for the very different degrees in which we find metamery
or segmentation expressed in the different divisions of the
animal kingdom. The incipient metamery which we have
traced (and which we have pictured to ourselves as arising
through natural selection amongst those forms, which, while
developing in length, find metamery to be a protective pecu-
liarity) immediately creates, by the fact of its existence, new
and variable material for selection, again to be acted upon.
And whilst metamery develops in one direction in one line of
descendants, the other line brings to the foreground a different
set of advantageous combinations, each of them again the
stock of new and varied forms. In other words, metamery
once established in its most primitive form, and intimately
connected with spontaneous fission under the influence of ex-
ternal agents, has been of very great moment in the bringing
1 Gegenbaur, in his ‘Grundriss der Vergleichenden Anatomie’ (1878), hints
at similar explanations to those advocated by Emery and myself, when he says
(p. 64):—“ Die Metamerie . . . lasst Zustinde des Beginnes und der
nicht ausgefiihrten Beendigung mannichfach erkennen . . . . In dem
Maasse als ein Metamer die Abhingigkeit vom Gesammntorganismus durch die
Ausbildung seiner eigenen Organe aufgicbt emancipirt er sich vom Ganzen
und gewinnt die Befabigung freier Existenz.” Further on he speaks of inci-
pient metamery as “eine stellenweise, fiir den Organismus praktisch werdende
Ausbildung ” of the different organ systems.
618 A. A. W. HUBRECHT,
about of new and endless variations of animal life. And it is
irrational, when we have before us, say one of the lowest
Vertebrata, in which nobody will deny the presence of distinct
metameric segmentation, to conclude that this metamery must
necessarily be in many respects reduced, and that in the an-
cestral forms it must have been far more complete, must have
stretched forwards along the whole of the head, must have
been more forcibly expressed than it is now—in all the cephalic
nerves, in the nephridia, the gill-slit, &c. ;—all this on the pre-
sumption of the existence of an ancestor so completely and
exemplarily segmental as to throw no light on the origin of
segmentation and metamery, unless by the aid of Perrier’s and
Cattaneo’s exaggerations. Such conclusions must, however,
necessarily be made by those who follow Dohrn’s and Semper’s
lead concerning the phylogeny of the Chordata.
Bateson, in taking Balanoglossus as his starting-point,
finds the acknowledged points of resemblance in the meta-
merous gill-slits, &c., and adds to them important data con-
cerning the metamerous ccelomic diverticula. Still, for a
general view on the origin of metamery, Balanoglossus
offers no points that we do not find more strongly represented
and more forcibly expressed in the Nemertea. It certainly
deserves mention that long before Bateson drew renewed
attention to the numerous points of agreement between
Balanoglossus and the Chordata, M‘Intosh! had done the
same for Balanoglossus and the Nemertea, a separate para-
graph of his monograph being devoted to the discussion of
these homologies.
Sedgwick (loc. cit.) holds the unsegmented worms to be
wholly ‘ negligeable quantities,” at any rate superfluous links
in the chain that connects the Chordata with the antecedent
Diploblastic stages. In my idea both these authors, valuable
as certain of their suggestions are, have not been thoroughly
aware of the necessity that, in all discussions on the origin of
metameric segmentation, we must attempt to grasp at data
1 W. M‘Intosh, ‘A Monograph of British Annelids,’ ‘A, Nemerteans,”
Ray Society Publications, 1878, 1874.
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 619
that give a clue to the possible action of natural selection in
the gradual evolution of metamery. This clue appears to me
to be far more distinctly contained in the views here advocated
than in the other hypotheses.
It may further be remarked, now that we have once more
alluded to Bateson’s phylogeny of the Chordata, that even
this naturalist does not feel justified in wholly rejecting
the Nemertea from the Vertebrate pedigree. Whilst in the
text of his article (loc. cit. p. 566) he does seem to prefer
this negative alternative ; still, in the subjoined diagram of the
general relationships of Urochorda, Hemichorda, Cephalo-
chorda, and Vertebrata, the Nemertea are introduced—with a
point of interrogation, however—as a side branch lower down
on the common parent stock. Now, this being concordant
with my own views of the Chordate phylogeny,—the point of
interrogation excepted,—it is necessary to inquire why there
is this discrepancy between Bateson’s speculations in the body
of his treatise and the hypothetical pedigree at the end of it.
It appears to me that this is due to his hesitation (loc. cit.
p. 555) in accepting the views hitherto entertained and advo-
cated by myself as to the phylogenetic connection between the
Nemertean and the Vertebrate nervous system. For this hesi-
tation Bateson has good reasons, and while I appreciate the
soundness of them, I hope in the remainder of this chapter to
remove the reluctance of him and others to accept the phylo-
genetic significance of the Nemertea, thanks to new light that
may be thrown on the evolution of the central nervous system
of the Chordata by the observations recorded by me on the
nervous system of the “‘ Challenger ” Nemertea.
It is to these speculations on the nervous system that we
now have to turn our attention.
As will be seen from the terminology introduced in the
paragraph on the nervous system in my Report on the “Chal-
lenger’ Nemertea, and as it is now time more fully to develop,
I am inclined to attach considerable morphological importance
to the arrangement of the different constituent parts of the
nervous system in the Nemertea. In former publications I
620 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
have repeatedly insisted on the significance of certain points in
the anatomy of the Nemertea, when considering the general
question of the relationship of the Chordata to their unknown
invertebrate ancestors, and I have insisted not only on the
possibility of the homology between the Nemertean proboscis
and the hypophysis cerebri of the Vertebrates, but I have,
even earlier still, attempted to show that the nerve-system of
these two groups might be considered in a common light, as
was first indicated by Harting in his ‘ Leerboek van de Grond-
beginselen der Dierkunde,’ of the year 1874. Further reference
to the hypothesis here alluded to is found in Balfour’s Mono-
graph on the Elasmobranch Fishes (pp. 170—172), in my own
publications'—, and in Balfour’s ‘Comparative Embryology ””
(vol. ii, p. 258). Iwill not here enter upon this hypothesis
more fully, but will briefly state that it attempted to consider
the central nervous system of the Vertebrates as a possible
median coalescence of two nerve-trunks, that were lateral in
the primitive ancestors of the Vertebrates, in the same way as
the coalesced ventral nerve-cord (Bauchmark) of Annelids and
Arthropods may be considered with Gegenbaur as having
arisen out of a double lateral trunk, which in certain, still
more highly differentiated, forms have fused ventro-medially.
A strong argument against the first-mentioned hypothesis
is the fact that the spinal cord ontogenetically always makes its
appearance as a median unpaired plate or thickening, a very
faint trace of a possible double origin of this plate being
hitherto only observable in one species of Amphibia, Triton
teniatus; whereas in all other Vertebrates); Amphioxus
1 «Zur Anatomie und Physiologie des Nervensystems der Nemertinen,”
‘ Verhandel. van de Koninkl. Akad. van Wetenschappen,’ Amsterdam, 1880,
vol. xx. ‘The Peripheral Nervous System of the Palso- and the Schizo-
nemertea, one of the layers of the body-wall,” ‘ Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ vol.
xx, 1880.
* It may here be remarked that Balfour has omitted to mention that
Harting was the first to bring forward this hypothesis ; it is well to be reminded
of this when Beard, Bateson, and others similarly ignore this claim to priority
of my venerated predecessor,
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 621
and the Cyclostomata not excepted, the unpaired origin is most
evident. The bilateral symmetry of the full-grown brain and
spinal cord is a much later feature, and can hardly be regarded
as the expression of a primary coalescence of two separate
halves to form a median whole.
I am the more inclined to abandon this hypothesis because
I will attempt to show that we can establish phylogenetic com-
parisons between the Chordate and the Nemertean nervous
system ona much more simple basis; comparisons which at
the same time cover a far more extensive ground than did
those of Harting, Balfour, and myself, which I have just
alluded to.
- Since in the nervous plexus of all the Nemertea a median
longitudinal tract, sometimes of comparatively large size, has
now been detected, since even in the Hoplonemertea, where
the plexus has disappeared, the same medio-dorsal nerve-tract
has in most cases been preserved, and, finally, since from this
dorso-median stem metameric and paired nerve-tracks may be
seen to emerge in Palzonemertea and Schizonemertea, we
must inquire in how far the direct comparison of this medio-
dorsal nerve-stem with a primitive spinal cord may be said to
hold good.
In order to do this we must first consider the relation of
this stem, to which we have given the name of medullary nerve
or medulla, to the rest of the nervous system, more especially
the brain-lobes.! Ina former publication,? where the medullary
nerve was for the first time noticed and described as the pro-
boscidian-sheath-nerve, I traced its origin to the dorsal com-
missure between the two lateral halves of the brain (loc. cit.,
pl. i, fig. 1). Thanks to certain very favorable specimens in
the Challenger collection, I have now been able to add new
data to this statement. Sections through the brain of Cere-
bratulus macroren, Cerebratulus corrugatus, and
1 Tn the course of these considerations a certain amount of repetition of
facts already noticed in the paragraph on the nervous system cannot well be
avoided.
? Verhand. Kon. Akad. v. Wetensch., Amsterdam, vol. xx, 1880.
622 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
Cerebratulus angusticeps (‘Zool. Challenger, Exp.,’
Part 54, pl. xii, figs. 1, 7,8; pl. xiii, fig. 1) show that the
condition of things is indeed less simple than this original
statement would imply,—that the medullary nerve is not an
eminently fibrous cord springing at right angles from the
eminently fibrous upper brain-commissure, but that the nerve-
tissue constituting the foremost and uppermost portions of the
upper brain-lobes spreads out over a far more considerable
surface than the fibrous tract which is known as the dorsal
commissure. This expansion of nerve-tissue, in which the
cellular elements are no less conspicuous than the fibrous, is
posteriorly directly continuous with the plexus above described,
laterally with the brain-lobes, anteriorly with the cephalic
nerves springing from these lobes. It attains its fullest deve-
lopment just before and behind the region where a transverse
bundle of fibres uniting the fibrous core of the lateral brain-
lobes forms the well-known dorsal brain-commissure. ‘This
commissure is a transverse fibrous tract forming part of a more
extensive nerve-plate. To this expansion of nerve-tissue the
presence of nerve-cells gives a more primitive, at any rate a
less specialised, character. These nerve-cells and nerve-fibres
are directly continuous with those of the medullary nerve and
(backwards) with those of the nerve-plexus, of which this
nerve is only the median longitudinal thickening. ‘There is
even more reason to look upon the fibres of this medullary
nerve as a tract of the general fibrous stroma not necessarily
connected with the fibres of the brain-commissure. In other
cases a more direct continuity between the commissural and
the medullary nerve-fibres was, however, observed.
In order clearly to understand the relative importance of
the different parts of the nervous system here noticed, the
primitive Paleonemertea offer the best starting-point.
Thus in Carinella we find the brain-lobes not yet separated
into distinct upper and lower lobes, nor do we find a posterior
lobe (side-organ). The brain is a double lateral and anterior
thickening in the nerve-plexus, situated like it and like the
lateral nerve-stems outside the muscular body-wall in the
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 623
deeper strata of the integument. The only difference between
the medio-dorsal medullary nerve in this species and the lateral
nerves with their anterior enlargements (the brain-lobes) is its
position and its greater tenuity (Pl. XLII, fig. 1), which,
however, does not prevent its being very clearly observable in
every transverse section. Its connection with the brain-com-
missure was already described and figured by me (loc. cit., p. 25,
pl. iii, fig. 81). It must, however, be remarked that in these
most primitive Paleeonemertea the anterior dorsal brain-com-
missure is less significant than in the Schizonemertea, and
hardly anything else than the foremost of those numerous
transverse metameric tracts in the plexus (dvr, Pl. XLII, fig. 1)
which connect the lateral stems with the medullary nerve
(dorsally) and with each other (ventrally).
These important metameric nerve-pairs are most distinctly
observed in Carinella. Here, as in the Schizonemertea, the
medullary nerve is also continued forwards in front of the brain
thickenings. This continuation sometimes shows a short bend
just on the level of the commissure, so that both the medullary
nerve and its anterior continuation may be seen in one section.
Posteriorly the medullary nerve can be followed down to the
hindmost extremity of the body. In Eupolia and the Schizo-
nemertea the arrangement remains the same, the metamery of
the transverse stems is perhaps more clearly expressed, the
whole plexus and the longitudinal stems are no longer in the
integument, but between the muscular layers. Still, the whole
of the nervous system also answers to the general type as
represented in the diagrammatic fig. 1 on Pl. XLII.
We have now seen enough of it to understand that a comparison
with the central apparatus of the Vertebrate nervous system
cannot indeed be called a strained comparison. On the con-
trary, the comparison is much less artificial than was the one
which Balfour was inclined to adopt, and which, as noted
above, rendered necessary the acceptance of the phylogenetic
development of the Vertebrate medulla of a double cord.
And so I do not hesitate to proclaim the medullary nerve of
the Nemertea to be a very important link in the phylogenetic
624 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
chain, of which the Vertebrate spinal cord is the outcome.
Like the Nemertean medulla, the Vertebrate spinal cord is
median, unpaired, and composed of nerve-cells and nerve-
fibres; like the Nemertean medulla, it is a thickening in a ner-
vous plexus, originally wholly epiblastic, of which, among
Vertebrates, the Amphibian embryos offer such a striking
example. This instructive and suggestive case was known to
Remak and Stricker (as the “* Nervenschicht” of the frog em-
bryo), it was more carefully studied and elaborately described
by Goette (his “Grundschicht” of the epiblast, in his ‘Entwicke-
lungsgeschichte der Unke’), and it has been again recently
brought into the foreground by Baldwin Spencer, in his latest
paper on the subject.1 The latter author compares the Am-
phibian plexus with that of Paleonemertea and Schizone-
mertea (loc. cit., p. 134), as had already been done before
him by my friend Professor Ray Lankester, with whose sug-
gestion I at that time (1880) did not yet venture fully to
associate myself.
The numerous data that have since been accumulated for a
direct comparison of Nemertea with lower Vertebrates appear,
however, now to fully justify that comparison which was first
expressed in a footnote to a former paper of mine.? There can
hardly be any doubt as to the existence, consequent upon
natural selection, of a constant tendency in the different
component parts of living organisms towards simplification
and increased efficiency (Roux’s ‘Kampf der Theile im Or-
ganismus’). This fact enables us to understand the gradual
supremacy of the median cord in the Nemertean plexus over
the two lateral ones. It seems as if it were mathematically
demonstrable that for the delicate adjustment of the impressions
from the exterior to the co-ordinated movements thereby occa-
sioned, one longitudinal central stem in bilateral, lengthened
animals would be more efficacious than two lateral ones. And
if we ask if, at the final stage of this struggle for supremacy
1 Baldwin Spencer, “Some notes on the early Development of Rana tem-
poraria,” ‘Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci.,’ vol. xxv; Suppl., p. 123, 1885.
2 ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xx, 1880, p. 438.
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 625
between three longitudinal stems, any remnants of the lateral
cords are yet detectable in the Vertebrate embryos, perhaps
even in the adults, I am inclined to answer in the affirmative.
Here I must be allowed to insert a reference to the three
figures on Pl. XLII, which will facilitate the exposition of the
further consequences of the hypothesis I am here developing
Fig. 1 represents the chief points in the nervous system of the
Nemertea. The brain-lobes are simple lateral swellings of the
longitudinal stems, as in Carinella; plexus, medulla, and
transverse stems, together with brain-lobes and lateral stems,
may be considered as forming part of the integument (ef.
Carinina). A double innervation of the respiratory portion
of the intestine is indicated; one due to visceral branches
(vi. sy) springing from the plexus (or from its transverse
tracts), the other to the more specialised nerve (v), which has
above been indicated as the Nemertean vagus nerve. The
plexus and its innumerable radial fibres, both sensory and
motor, are not indicated in this figure, nor are the nerve-stems
which, when present, pass from the lateral stems directly to
the integument.
This figure must now be compared with the two others. Of
these, Pl. XLII, fig. 2, diagrammatically represents the chief
points that may be considered as characteristic of the nervous
system of a lower Vertebrate, in which the dorsal and ventral
roots of the spinal nerves (dr and vr) are as yet separate nerve-
tracts, in which the sympathetic nerve system is as yet only
represented by visceral branches given off by these dorsal roots
(vz. sy), and in which the polymerous character of a primitive
vagus (Vag) is established.
Pl. XLII, fig. 3, stands for Amphioxus, as far as we know
its nervous system, more particularly through the researches of
Rohon and others. It differs from the foregoing by the
absence of a distinct brain swelling and of a polymerous vagus.
A number of spinal nerves are considered as homologous with
the vagus of Vertebrates by Rohon. The commissural con-
nections between the successive spinal nerves form a plexus,
which is peripherally even much more elaborate, according to
626 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
Rohon’s figures. This plexus does not reveal the presence of
any distinct lateral longitudinal nerve, nor any ganglia of
spinal or cephalic nerves. The latter (cn) may be said to be
three in number. Visceral branches (v7. sy) are given off by
the dorsal nerves (d7). The ventral ones, springing from the
lower edge of the medulla, are here represented as shorter
stems (vr).
The opposite half of the system, seen in transparent per-
spective, as given in the two other figures, is purposely omitted
here, because of the asymmetry of Amphioxus in this
respect.
Now a glance at these figures will convince us that the
situation of the Nemertean medullary nerve in its plexus, and
with its set of transverse nerves, is directly comparable to the
Vertebrate medulla and spinal nerves. The nerve-plexus
filling up the intervening spaces in Nemertea is present as a
transitory structure in Amphibian embryos.
The ulterior appearance of an anterior enlargement forming
the Vertebrate brain; the higher complication attained by the
brain and spinal cord when its mass increases, but not its
dorsal expansion, by the appearance of medullary ridges ; and
the formation of a neural canal by infolding of the neural
plate, all these are important developmental facts which do not
in any way weaken the grounds for comparison of the two
structures. They may be looked upon as adaptations to the
much more considerable efficiency and concentration that is
gradually attained by the central nervous system as we ascend
higher in the scale of the animal kingdom.
The fact that the neural ridge in so many Vertebrata
precedes the appearance of the spinal nerves, and is inserted
along the top of the folds that bend together to form the
neural tube, may be thus interpreted, that during the phylo-
genetic process of infolding the transverse nerve-tracts (dorsal
spinal roots) remain attached in the same way to the medio-
dorsal collecting trunk as they did in the ancestral forms, and
are dragged upwards by the infolding process. The ventral
roots must be phylogenetically linked to the plexus as well;
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 627
inasmuch as the musculature originally lies inwards of the
nervous plexus, their deeper situation is not surprising.
In the points hitherto enumerated there is entire coinci-
dence between Amphioxus and the other Vertebrata, as far
as their comparability with the Nemertean diagram goes.
Another point of coincidence is the way in which the foremost
position of the intestinal canal and adjacent blood-vessels are
innervated by visceral nerve-stems, indicated in all the three
diagrams by vw. sy.
The claims to validity of the comparison here made between
the spinal nerves of the Chordata and the transverse stems
of the Nemertea should again be insisted on, now that the
researches of Rohon,' Freud,” Schneider, Ransom, and d’Arcy
Thompson? have established for the lower Chordata (Cephalo-
chorda and Cyclostomata) that the typical chordate spinal
nerve is not originally provided with a double root, but that
this double root appears to have arisen by the coalescence of
what were primitively in the groups just mentioned separate
and alternating dorsal and ventral nerve-tracts. With these
so much simpler spinal nerves the transverse nerve-stems of
the Nemertea undoubtedly offer points of comparison. These
Nemertean nerves specially differ from the Vertebrate spinal
nerves in two respects: (1) they give off nerve-fibres in differ-
ent directions, which are probably motor as well as sensory
and visceral, according to the different organ systems they
1V. Rohov, “Untersuchungen itiber Amphioxus lanceolatus,’’
* Denkschr. d. k. Akad. d. Wiss. Wien,’ Bd. xlv.
2 §. Freud, “ Ueber Spinalganglién und Riickenmark des Petromyzon
(‘Sitzungsb. math.-nat. cl. k, Akad. Wiss. Wien,’ Bd. Ixxviii, Abth. 3, 1878).
This author says (p. 154) :—‘“‘ Ich kann wenigstens von den letzten Wurzeln
des Caudalmarks sagen dass ihre Selbstandigkeit so gross ist, dass man von
vorderen und hinteren Spinalnerven, anstatt von vorderen und_hinteren
Wurzeln reden konute ”; and Wiedersheim in the 2nd edition of his ‘ Lehr-
buch der Vergleichenden Anatomie’ (p. 321) :—* Vieles spricht dafiir dass die
Vorfahren der heutigen Wirbelthiere getrennte dorsale und ventrale Ner-
venwurzeln besessen haben miissen.”
3 W. R. Ransom and d’Arcy W. Thompson, “ On the Spinal and Viscera
Nerves of Cyclostomata,” ‘ Zool. Anzeiger,’ No. 227, July, 1886.
628 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
terminate in; and (2) they go round ventrally, each of them
forming a loop all round the body. As to the first point of
difference just alluded to, it is the expression of a low and
primitive degree of differentiation, and when a step forwards
is made differentiation of labour will tend to develop certain
tracts more particularly containing sensory and visceral nerve-
fibres, which are more especially directed towards the epithelia
(the primitive dorsal or posterior roots), and others more
particularly containing motor nerve-fibres, and more especially
directed inwards towards the muscles (the primitive ventral or
anterior roots), because the musculature, as was already men-
tioned, is originally situated internally to the nervous system.
For the present we can only hold it to be established that
the fibres of these three categories are blended in the Nemer-
tean plexus, without being able to determine in how far the
specialisation therein observed, of the appearance of transverse
metameric nerves, may at the same time be accompanied by a
commencement of differentiation, such as has just been alluded
to. We may, in other words, not yet assume that among
these metameric stems there is already a tendency to an
alternation between such as have sensory and visceral and
such as have motor predispositions.
Only in a few cases may we be justified in saying that
certain nerve-tracts belonging to the Nemertean peripheral
system are more especially sensory or visceral, and these no
doubt offer important analogies in their situation and connec-
tions to similar nerve-tracts of the Vertebrata
The second point of difference, viz. the continuity in the
ventral median line of the transverse tracts of the Nemertea,
is no doubt a consequence (a) of their origin, in a perfectly
continuous plexus, (4) of the cylindrical arrangement of the
muscular layers, which in most cases are uninterrupted both
in the dorsal and in the ventral median line. It is all the
more important to notice that, more especially in the primitive
Carinellide, the tendency is very marked towards a scission of
this muscular body-wall into a right and a left half.
This longitudinal scission is no doubt the first expression of
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 629
the phenomenon which shows us the musculature of the right
and left half of the body, developing quite independently in
the Chordata. It is easy intelligible how, as this phenomenon
gradually becomes more and more marked, no more ventral
connecting fibres across the non-muscular region were required
for the innervation of the musculature of the right and left
half of the body.
The process by which the transverse nerve-tract, with radial
- nerve-fibres leaving it at short intervals, both centripetally
and centrifugally, gradually assumed the form of a nerve-stem
with a dorsal and a ventral branch, such as we find in the
spinal nerves, must have gone on pari passu with those
numerous other changes which we cannot as yet fully trace,
but which must have occurred when (1) the muscular meta-
mery became gradually established, (2) the dorso-median me-
dullary tract became so preponderant that an increase in mass,
with economy of bulk, was only to be obtained by a process
of folding-in already discussed above, and (3) the attachment
of the spinal nerves (transverse tracts) to the medulla was
modified in consequence of this process.
None of these phenomena, however, offer anything that is
in any way inconsistent with, or opposed to, the general theory
here developed.
We have now sufficiently insisted on the chief point of
comparison here proposed, viz. that between the Nemertean
medullary nerve and its metameric transverse nerve-cords and
the Vertebrate cerebro-spinal axis and spinal nerves.
If Amphioxus were the only Vertebrate known, we should,
recognising the phylogenetic importance of the plexiform
arrangement still met with in the adult of that species, admit
that, as far as we know at present, the primary lateral nerves
with their anterior swellings of the Vermian ancestors had
disappeared in the same measure as the dorso-median spinal
cord had come more and more into the foreground.
But our consideration of other Vertebrates leads us to the
conclusion that, when once the general homology between the
two nervous systems is admitted, there may perhaps be secondary
630 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
points in regard to which the comparison can be further ex-
tended. And it must be recognised that, if we should also
succeed in rendering more or less probable a comparison in
secondary details, this might again be favorably interpreted
for the primary and more important part of the hypothesis.
The search after these secondary points of agreement was
instituted by me when the question above alluded to presented
itself, viz. if any remnant could be traced of the central ner-
vous system of Nemertea-like ancestors, i.e. of the brain-lobes
and lateral stems, in those Vertebrate descendants in which
the medio-dorsal tract had become so preponderant as to give
rise to the unpaired medulla and brain.
It is clear that if it shall be possible to trace any such rem-
nants, and to render their homology with the Nemertean central
nervous system probable, they will have to be sought for—
(a) in the head, as lateral more or less independent nerve-
centra, innervating sense-organs of the integument, and passing
posteriorly into parallel longitudinal stems; or (8) in the trunk,
as longitudinal nerve-stems, in which the central character
should be somewhat less marked than in the anterior swelling,
but in which the original significance as parts of the central
system should still be indicated either by histological or by
embryological features.
To these latter conditions nothing can answer in the Verte-
brate nervous system excepting the so-called ramus lateralis
vagi. It is present in all Vertebrates above Amphioxus,
long and important in the aquatic Ichthyopsida, gradually
disappearing when the aquatic medium is exchanged for an
air-breathing existence, and finally only retained in the higher
Vertebrates as the inconspicuous ramus auricularis vagi.
Its course is indeed strictly lateral, and has always been a
puzzle to anatomists. Stannius! characterises the existence
and the course of this sensory nerve along the trunk down to
the tail as “ one of the most interesting facts of anatomy.”
None the less startling is its development. Whilst Balfour
attempted in this respect to bring it on one line with the other
‘ «Das peripherische Nervensystem der Fische,’ p. 108.
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 631
parts of the peripheral nervous system, the corresponding re-
sults of Semper, Goette, van Wijhe, and Hoffmann are all in
the contrary direction. They have seen the nervus lateralis
appear as an independent product of the epiblast,
arising in loco along its whole length, its formation often
even preceding that of the spinal nerves. These results have
again been fully confirmed and definitely established by the
latest investigator of the problem, Beard,! who also gives a
detailed description and figures of the connection between the
nervus lateralis and the vagus ganglion, both of them so much
more massive and conspicuous in early embryonic stages than
later on.
And now that we are attempting to find out whether there
is a possibility of comparing the lateral nerve-stems of lower
worms with the nervus lateralis of Vertebrata, we are naturally
led to consider, in the second place, the question whether the
anterior swellings of these lateral stems (the paired brain-lobes
of the worm) may have their morphological equivalents, their
remnants, in the set of anterior nervous swellings that are
found in the head on a level with the nervus lateralis, and
longitudinally connected with it; viz. the variable set of
ganglia of the cephalic nerves.
As to the origin of these ganglia of the cranial nerves I have
no observations of my own, and must rely on the data of other
observers.
It is suggestive to give the opinion of the three latest in-
vestigators of the development of these organs in different
groups of Vertebrates in their own words.
Professor A. Froriep,? who studied Mammalian embryos,
writes (loc. cit., p. 35):—“The ganglia (of facialis, glosso-
pharyngeus, and vagus) enter into a peculiar, very intimate
connection with the epiderm ;” further (p. 40), “these gangli-
onic connections with the epiderm must probably be regarded
1 «The System of Branchial Sense-Organs, &c., in Ichthyopsida,” ‘ Quart.
Journ. Mier. Sci.,? November, 1885, p. 95.
2 «Ueber Anlagen von Sinnesorganen am Facialis, &.,” ‘ Archiv f. Anat. u.
Phys.,’ 1885, Anat. Abth.
VOL. XXVII, PART 4,.—NEW SER, xx
632 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
as rudiments of organs which have phylogenetically disappeared,
and which are only now retained in the ontogenetic develop-
ment ;” then (p. 43) “ for the Gasserian ganglion there is no
indication of a connection with the epiderm;” and, lastly
(p. 52), “it appears to be hardly any longer possible to look
upon these nerve-ganglia (Nervenknoten) as simply homologous
with spinal ganglia.”
Baldwin Spencer! writes (loc. cit., p. 129) concerning
Rana temporaria: “Along certain lines the cells of the
nervous layer proliferate, and it is by this proliferation that
the rudiments of the cranial nerves are laid down;” further
(p. 180), ‘the development of the ganglia at the level of the
lateral line, and the fact of their long connection with the epi-
blast at this point,.... . is of great interest in connection
with certain points in the development of the Elasmobranch
nerves.”
Concerning the developmental phenomena of the trunk-
region at this period, the spinal nerves are stated to be not
yet visible, ‘though the nervous sheath is clearly developed
and in this the lateral line.”
The author next mentions observations made by him on Dr.
Beard’s sections of Elasmobranch embryos, and goes on to say
(loc. cit., p. 131):
“The Gasserian ganglion is, at all events in part, formed
directly from the epiblast..... the same development
takes place in the case of the ganglion of the third and
seventh nerve—in that of the ciliary ganglion the develop-
ment is particularly clear—..... The ganglia arise
along a level of the lateral line continued on the
head.”
He next says: “‘ The curious origin of the ganglia of the
cranial nerves points strongly to the conclusion that .....
their present condition and nature must..... be regarded
as a secondary and certainly not primitive condition.
“Tn passing, I may just notice that on this supposition an
1 «Early Development of Rana temporaria,” ‘Quart. Journ. Mier,
Sci,,’ Suppl., 1885.
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 633
explanation is offered as to the origin and meaning of the
two curious branches which unite respectively the ganglia of
the fifth and seventh and fifth and third cranial nerves ; they
may be regarded as persistent parts of the lateral nerve .
in the head.”
In the third place extracts will be given from Beard’s more
extensive paper.! He writes (p. 97) as an introductory state-
ment: “ At present we are acquainted with no Invertebrate
nervous system which is built upon the same plan as that of
Vertebrates,” and then passes to the results of his investiga-
tions, chiefly carried out on embryos of Torpedo and a
few other Elasmobranchs. I make the following selections
(p TOL):
“At the point of fusion” (of the cephalic nerve with the
epiblast) “a local thickening of epiblast has previously taken
place. After the fusion has taken place a proliferation of some
of the cells composing the thickening ensues. The proliferated
cells form a mass of actively dividing elements still connected
with the skin. ... . This mass of cells is the rudiment of the
ganglion of the dorsal root.”
On p. 110 he adds: “ Along with the separation of the
(vagus) ganglion from the skin the sensory thickening begins
to grow backwards along the lateral surface of the trunk.
This thickening is the rudiment of the so-called lateral line.
BU A gar eee: The so-called lateral nerve is formed from the deeper
portion of the sensory thickening...... That there is no
actual growth backwards of the nerve is obvious enough.”
Recapitulating, we must acknowledge that the mode of origin
of the ganglia of the cephalic nerves, as described by these
authors, is certainly a peculiar one—a mode of development
sui generis. One of Beard’s accompanying diagrammatic
figures, reproduced in Wiedersheim’s second edition (1886) of
the ‘Lehrbuch der Vergleichenden Anatomie’ as woodcut
No. 265, moreover, shows how the position of the cephalic
ganglion, developing as an ectodermal proliferation, is in this
1 “Branchial Sense-Organs in Ichthyopsida,” ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’
November, 1885, No. CI,
634 A. A. W. HUBREOHT.
early stage eminently lateral, a conclusion corroborated by
the figures of his actual sections. This primitive position is,
of course, gradualiy lost, and could never be predicted from
a study of these ganglia and their position and significance in
the adult animal. Yet it is not without significance when seen
in the light of the suggestion here brought forward. And that
the interpretation of the phenomena in question as given by
these authors is not universally accepted, thus leaving room
for new suggestions, is proved by the following citation from
Ransom’s and d’Arcy Thompson’s latest article,! running as
follows :—‘‘ Although the lamprey presents a_ well-marked
lateralis nerve it has not also a regular lateral line, for the
sense-organs of the skin are scattered and without segmental
arrangement. The sense-organs do not, therefore, appear to
be in direct relation with the spinal ganglia, and the view of
the close connection between them (Spencer, Beard, Froriep)
does not receive support...... It seems more natural to
consider the lateralis as a relic of the extensive and irregu-
lar commissure system connecting the posterior roots of
Amphioxus.”
Passing from a consideration of the embryonic ganglia to
their connection in the adults, I must mention the connection
of the ramus lateralis vagi with cephalic nerves anterior to
the vagus. I will not here give a description of the numerous
varieties presented by this nervous connection, but merely
refer to the arrangement in Vertebrates so low as the lam-
preys. We there find, according to Johannes Miller, the
ramus lateralis originating from the seventh as well as from
the tenth pair of cephalic nerves, and if we compare the very
satisfactory figure which was only lately? given by Ahlborn
of this arrangement, we must recognise that this nervous con-
nection is importaut, and has more the aspect of a direct for-
ward continuation of the nervus lateralis than of a sensory
1 «On the Spinal and Visceral Nerves of Cyclostomata,” ‘ Zool. Anzeiger,’
No. 227, July, 1886.
2 ¢ Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xl, pl. xviii.
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 635
branch from the facialis, establishing a connection between it
and the vagus.
Ahlborn mentions the existence of a similar connecting
stem reaching further forward still, and connecting the trige-
minus and facialis. How these connections vary in the different
adult Vertebrata will not be discussed here.
The different facts and speculations here brought forward in
connection with the cephalic ganglia and the nervus lateralis
vagi may suffice for the present. They may severally be
brought to bear upon the question of the eventual homology
of Vertebrate cephalic ganglia and nervus lateralis, on the one
hand, and Vermian paired brain-lobes and lateral nerve-stems
on the other. The parts here compared being indicated in
figs. 1 and 2 of Pl. XLII, with corresponding letters (Ly and
In), a glance at these figures may further convey a notion of
the purport of these speculations.
There is one fact, however, which is not indicated in these
figures, which is nevertheless of very high importance for the
views here considered, and which I must therefore develop
more in detail.
It is the connection between the successive spinal nerves
and the ramus lateralis vagi.
The existence of similar connections between the (eminently
sensory and cutaneous) dorsal roots and the (similarly sensory
and cutaneous) lateral nerve is for the first time mentioned
by Ransom and d’Arcy Thompson for Petromyzon in the
following passage (loc. cit., p. 422):
“The dorsal rami of the posterior roots pass up (over the
lateralis nerve) to the skin of the back, but appear also to
send fibres into the lateralis. (For this statement we
at present rely only on sections, but we hope shortly to test it
by dissections of the large Petromyzon marinus.)”
It hardly needs comment that if this observation should be
confirmed the fact would be of the utmost importance for the
hypothesis under discussion. We should then be permitted to
consider these metameric connections between the dorsal roots
and the nervus lateralis of Petromyzon, as the relics of an
636 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
earlier stage, still permanent in the Nemertea, where the
metamerically consecutive transverse nerve-tracts similarly
unite the medullary nerve and the lateral stems.
This connection is, as we know, also brought about in the
Nemertea by the plexus, in those parts of it which spread out
between the transverse tracts, and it may here be asked if
relics of such a plexus between the successive precursors of the
spinal nerves are perhaps retained, not only in Amphioxus
(see above, p. 625, and Rohon, loc. cit., fig. 13), but also in
Osseous Fishes, in the numerous superficial nerves described
and figured by Stannius,’ or whether we must rather look
upon this multiplication of lateral nerves (one of which is
called by Stannius the nervus lateralis trigemini, others, rami
communicantes of the dorsal branches of spinal nerves, &c.)
as derivatives from the nervus lateralis vagi.? This question
can, of course, only be solved by careful anatomical and
embryological investigations. That the nervus lateralis was
often (Stannius) observed in the Petromyzontide only along
a part of the length of the body (Schneider and Born, ac-
cording to Ahlborn,’ observed it as “bis an das Hinterende
des Korpers”’?) is not confirmed by modern investigators.
Ahlborn’s description (loc. cit., p. 304) of the variable
situation of this nerve in Petromyzon is very suggestive
in connection with the views here advocated. Ransom and
d’Arcy Thompson consider that the regularity of the in-
tegumentary sensory apparatus is not yet established in
Petromyzon, as may be concluded from the citation given
above.
We have now considered the superficial ramifications of
what I may call the lateral nerve-system, both in lower worms
and in Vertebrates; we must now turn to the intestinal, to
1 «Das peripherische Nervensystem der Fische,’ 1849, pls. ii—iv.
2 It should be remembered that Beard is inclined (loc. cit., p. 139) to look
upon the superficial longitudinal nerve-fibres, by which the successive epithelial
modifications along the lateral line are often connected (Solger, Bodenstein),
as such derivatives (by longitudinal fission in its very early stages) of the
nervus lateralis.
3 *Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool.’ Bd. xl. pp. 303 and 301.
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 637
the visceral branches of this same system, from which other
and important data may be gathered for further elucidation of
the hypothesis under consideration.
We have already seen that in Nemertea the typical innerva-
tion of the respiratory portion of the intestine is brought
about—(a) by a pair of nerves directed backwards and spring-
ing from the anterior lateral swellings (the brain-lobes) of
the lateral nerve-stems; (0) by numerous visceral branches
starting from the plexus, directed inwards as branches that
spread over the wall of blood-lacune and intestine.
In the Vertebrata, Amphioxus excepted, we also find that
the innervation of the anterior respiratory portion of the
intestine and of the circulatory apparatus is obtained from
two sources, viz. (1) the cephalic nerves, amongst which the
vagus nerve is in this respect the most important;! (2) the
visceral branches of the spinal nerves, which are at the basis
of what is afterwards more highly differentiated and separately
recognised as the sympathetic nerve-system.
In Nemertea it is very difficult to determine in the anterior
part of the intestinal wall which tracts belong to the so-called
vagus nerve, which to this system of visceral nerve-branches.
So it is often in Vertebrata, and the blending together
(in both divisions of the animal kingdom) of two systems,
each of them again mutually comparable when separately
considered, is an important point of agreement, and would,
if no actual homology were at the base of it, be a very puzzling
coincidence.
It is in this respect highly suggestive that Born notices, as
early as 1827, what was afterwards confirmed by Ahlborn
(Joe. cit.) and others, that in Petromyzon, i.e. one of the
lowest Vertebrates, the spinal nerves send out connecting
branches towards the pneumogastric nerves. The existence
1 Ventrally these nerves (e.g. the n. hypoglossus) are sometimes commis-
surally united with their representative of the opposite half of the body. It
must remain an open question whether these commissures are in any way
comparable either to the Nemertean vagus commissures (cf. p. 83), or to the
general ventral commissural system of these worms.
638 A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
of superficial metameric connections (Ransom and d’Arcy
Thompson, vide supra) as well as of this set of deeper
connections between the transverse and the latero-longitu-
dinal nerve-stems (n. lateralis and nu. pneumogastricus, of
Petromyzon would thus be a remarkable repetition of the
similar arrangement in the Nemertea, as it has been here for
the first time demonstrated.
The facts as they lie before us do not, however, admit of
any very circumstantial comparison so far as the nerves in
particular are concerned, and I purposely refrain from entering
into any details. Yet it should be remarked :
(1) That the polymerous root of the Vertebrate vagus nerve
is very readily explicable if we take the Nemertean arrange-
ment as a starting-point (Pl. XLII, figs. 1, 2, vag), as is also
the mixture of sensory and motor elements in this root.!
(2) That similarly, if the anterior cephalic nerves (e.g. the
fifth) should prove to be polymerous, this would in no way be
astonishing nor difficult to bring into harmony with that same
starting-point.
(3) That the presence of superficial branches to the integu-
ment and to the musculature, and of deeper branches to the
intestinal epithelium in those parts that will contribute to
form the cephalic nerves, is similarly foreshadowed in the
Nemertea.
(4) That the equivalent of the Nemertean vagus nerve will
have to be sought for in such branches of the Vertebrate vagus
as more especially innervate the intestinal epithelium,” whereas
1 Rohon, “‘ Ueber den Ursprung des Nervus vagus bei Selachiern,” ‘ Arbeit.
Zool. Inst. Wien,’ vol. i, p. 159.
2 | have good reasons, based upon actual observations made by my pupil,
Mr. Dobberke, to believe that the ramus intestinalis vagi in adult Hlasmo-
branchs may be traced centripetally from its region of innervation of the
foremost portion of the intestinal wall, towards the brain, as a bundle of nerve-
fibres running parallel to and combined with those for the branchial apparatus,
but that, nevertheless, this bundle can be separately traced up to the vagus
ganglion, without any further intimate relation to those branchial branches
(cf. Beard, loc. cit., p. 110). If this should actually be the case, the
possibility of a direct comparison between the Nemertean
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 6389
the innervation of the Vertebrate gill-slits, which marks a later
phylogenetic stage, in which these perforations of the anterior
trunk region have appeared, may be as well put to the account
of more superficial parts of the transverse tracts.
(5) That the common starting-point of the sensory, lateral,
and the intestinal portion of the vagus has also attracted the
attention of former observers. Ransom and d’Arcy Thompson
write: “In the embryo dog-fish the second or ventral com-
missure, described by Balfour, &c., as uniting the roots of the
vagus, ventral to the ganglia, is essentially a sympathetic com-
missure, whose (visceral) fibres pass on, as described by Balfour,
to form the intestinal branch of the vagus. In that intestinal
branch we have an outflow of visceral fibres, quite comparable
to, e.g. a splanchnic branch of the dorsal sympathetic system.
The connection between the origin of the lateralis and this
ventral commissure connecting the vagus roots in the dog-fish,
and similarly the relation of the lateralis to the loops uniting
the ganglia of the fifth, seventh, and tenth nerves in Petro-
my zon, may probably be described as indicating a fusion in this
region of the two great commissural systems which posteriorly
are separate, viz. that of the sensory branches (lateralis) and the
visceral or sympathetic.
“We agree with Gaskell that the term sympathetic should
be suffered to fall into disuse, as tending to perpetuate the old
conception of the primary importance of the longitudinal
nerve-tract ; whereas the leading fact is the metamerically
recurring outflow of visceral fibres, which may or may not be
united together by successive longitudinal commissures.”
In the Nemertea this anterior ‘‘ fusion of the great com-
vagus nerve and the Vertebrate ramus intestinalis vagi, of
course, comes more closely within our reach. It need not be insisted upon
that if these comparisons prove correct the separate intestinal nerve-systems
(sympathetic nerve system) of other Invertebrates (Annelids, Arthropods,
Molluses) cannot be looked upon as homologous with the sympathetic nerve-
system of the Vertebrates, but would rather be homologous with that portion
of the intestinal innervation of the latter which comes to the account of their
cephalic nerves, in so far as these represent derivatives of the Nemertean
vagus, and are marked » in figs. l and 2 of Pl. XLII.
640 A. A. W. HUBBECHT.
missural systems”’ is foreshadowed at the point where brain-
lobe, lateral stem, and “ vagus nerve ” meet, or rather diverge.
It has been attempted in figs. 1 and 2 to indicate the points
here alluded to in a general way, special comparisons being, on
the grounds that have been stated, purposely avoided.
If we now turn to Dohrn’s and Semper’s hypothesis we must
recognise that no such satisfactory general comparisons are
there possible. Even if we were inclined to accept the “ turn-
ing over” of Geoffroy St. Hilaire, by which back and belly
became exchanged, and to admit the brain-piercing cesophagus,
regarding the Annelid supracesophageal ganglion and the
ventral nerve-cord as respectively homologous to cerebrum and
medulla, it must still be conceded that we have not then in
any way before us a nerve-system offering as many points of
comparison with the Vertebrate system as does that of the
Nemertea.
Concerning the Annelids we have no observations by which
the cephalic ganglia and the cephalic nerves are so clearly
foreshadowed, none which would throw light on the origin of
the vagus, its connection with the nervus lateralis and with the
anterior cephalic ganglia, none concerning the sympathetic
system and its blending with the vagus system in the lowest
Vertebrates, indications of which are even retained in the
highest. Nor is the ventral nerve-cord of Annelids, with its
undeniable double character and double origin a match, so
far as comparison goes, for the Nemertean medullary nerve,
with its transverse nerves preceding the spinal nerves of
Amphioxus and the Cyclostomata.
And if we are then asked to consider the lens of the Verte-
brate eye as a modified ectodermal branchial invagination, as
the outer portion of what was once a functional gill-slit,! we
feel that the ground under our feet is becoming rather uncom-
fortable, and that it is high time to reconsider whether all
these ingenious speculations in which the most beautifully
pliable hypothetical and unknown Annelids play a too conspi-
cuous part should not be definitely abandoned, and a new
1 Dohrn, ‘Studien,’ x, p. 459, 1885.
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 641
departure made by those who are interested in the phylogeny
of the Chordata. In due time arduous and detailed morpho-
logical investigations on the Platyelminthes in general, and on
the Nemertea in particular, may then lead us to more satis-
factory conclusions than are the fata morgana that are so
temptingly evoked before our eyes by the ingenious manipula-
tions of the indefatigable founder of the first and foremost
Zoological Station, when, following his lead, we find ourselves
wandering in the barren deserts of that province of phylogeny
in which he attempts to establish a close connection between
Chordata and Annelida.
All these considerations have induced me to give this rapid
outline sketch of the degree of comparison which I hold to
exist between Chordate and Nemertean (more especially Palzo-
nemertean and Schizonemertean) nervous systems, although I
am perfectly aware that there is a growing tendency among
those authors at present occupied with questions concerning
the morphology of the Vertebrate nervous system (Froriep,
Baldwin Spencer, Beard, Cunningham, Kleinenberg, and many
others) to accept Semper’s and Dohrn’s views of the Annelidan
descent of Vertebrates. Wiedersheim, in the new edition of
his ‘ Vergleichende Anatomie’ (1886), does not even hesitate
to bring these results in their unripe phase before the more
extensive public of students, and this generally in acquiescent
terms. It is curious to see how, e.g. the quéstion of the
cephalic nerves and their comparison to spinal nerves, that
of the nerve-roots, the cephalic ganglia and their respective
connecting trunks, have given occasion to the most diverse
twisting and retwisting of the facts in order to bring out a
fixed scheme or diagram, which might then be compared to
what obtained in Annelids, and in which the highest degree of
similarity between the respective somites might be obtained,
thus establishing a preconceived idea of the Vertebrate ancestor
as a most rigorously segmented animal. The value of these
speculations has been already tested above, and I may be
allowed once more to express my conviction that our com-
parisons between the Chordata and their lower Invertebrate
64.2 A. A. W. HUBREOHT.
predecessors may only be looked upon as in any way satisfactory
so long as they remain on a very broad and general basis, and
that any very special homology said to be demonstrated ought
for that very reason to be more especially suspected.}
For my part I believe that, along the lines above indicated,
a comparison between Vertebrate and Invertebrate nervous
systems will in future prove to be more fruitful, but I wish to
repeat that for the present we can only indicate general points
of coincidence between the two, and must rigorously refrain
from making comparisons in detail.
On the other hand, it is suggestive once more to consider
what has been recorded in my ‘Challenger Report’ concerning
the nervous system of Drepanophorus Lankesteri, when
compared with that of certain Annelids; and we may, I be-
lieve, safely come to the conclusion which was formulated by
me seven years ago, but which I now hold to be much more
solidly established, that we have in the Nemertea an important
group through which definite glimpses may be obtained at the
sources from which both Chordata and Appendiculata (Ray
Lankester) have respectively sprung. The proposition first
formulated by Gegenbaur, about the phylogenetic origin of
the ventral nerve-cord and cesophageal ring of the Annelida
out of ancestors with lateral cords, has obtained new support
from the arrangement which was met with in the species just
mentioned. And just as we have before tentatively discussed
the question, in how far remnants of the lateral cords were
retained in those descendants in which the median one had
been raised to the dignity of a medulla spinalis (the Verte-
1 Bateson (loc. cit., p. 562) seems to take a similar view of the efforts here
alluded to. He says: ‘“‘No doubt the cranial nerves may, by arbitrary
divisions and combinations, be shaped into an arrangement which more or less
simulates that which is supposed by some to have been present in the rest of
the body, but little is gained by this exercise beyond the production of a false
symmetry.”—Dohrn himself, whose suggestions have so largely contributed
to the accumulation of all this conflicting evidence, is now rather in the
position of Goethe’s Zauberlehrling, and writes (‘Studien,’ x, p. 468, 1885):
“Auch auf diesem Gebiet (die Frage nach der Bedeutung der Hirnnerven)
bildet die bisherige vergleichende Anatomie das Bild eines auf stiirmischer
See steuerlos herumgeschleuderten Schiffes.”
RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 648
brata), we might now consider whether any remnants of the
median dorsal cord are retained in those descendants in which
the lateral cords have differentiated into brain-lobes, cesopha-
geal ring, and ventral cord (the Annelida). To this question
I have no definite answer to offer, but I may call attention to
the significant fact that the beautiful and exemplary investiga-
tions into the embryonic development of Lopadorhynchus,
very recently published by Kleinenberg,' have demonstrated
the existence in the larva of that Annelid of a nerve-stem
answering to the conditions here required. It is dorso-medially
situated, it is anteriorly connected with the brain, or rather
with a transverse nerve-tract (Kleinenberg’s prototrochal nerve-
ring), which in its turn is connected with the brain,” it appears to
be connected close to the anus with the ventral cord (the fused
lateral stems), and though appearing in early larval life, and
having only a temporary existence, it is regarded by Kleinenberg
as having considerable physiological importance. If the light
in which I am inclined to look at it is not deceptive, its
morphological significance also can hardly be overrated.
In closing this chapter of general considerations we may
ouce more bring before our minds the proposition with which
it was opened. We have here and in the foregoing chapters
adduced facts and arguments which appear to speak in its
favour; we will once more rapidly enumerate the common
characteristics of Nemertea and Cceelenterata, as well as those
of Nemertea and Chordata.
The Ccelenterate characteristics that are also found in the
Nemertea are the following :
a. The presence of nematocysts in the _ proboscidian
epithelium.
b. The elaborate nerve-plexus in the integument, and its
histological features.
c. The presence of epiblastic muscle-fibres separate from the
general body-musculature.
1 «Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xliv, Heft. i, ii, October, 1886, p. 107;
pl. vii, fig. 27a.
2 For comparison with the Nemertea, cf. Pl. XLII, fig. 1.
644, A. A. W. HUBRECHT.
d. The presence and the chemical constitution of a some-
times very massive intermuscular jelly by which the other
internal organs are at the same time surrounded.
e. The mode of development of the mesoblast (at least in
Lineus obscurus), which is less specialised than in most.
other Invertebrates.
f. The absence of any distinct enteroccele.
The points of resemblance with the Chordata may be thus
tabulated :
a. The general features of the nervous system.
b. The presence of a homologue of the hypophysis cerebri as
a massive and important organ (the proboscis).
c. The presence of tissues which may have become converted
into the notochord (viz. the material of which the proboscidian
sheath is built up).
d, The respiratory significance of the anterior portion of the
alimentary tract.
At the base of all the speculations contained in this
chapter lies the conviction, so strongly insisted upon by
Darwin, that new combinations or organs do not appear by
the action of natural selection unless others have preceded,
from which they are gradually derived by a slow change and
differentiation.
That a notochord should develop out of the archenteric
wall because a supporting axis would be beneficial to the
animal may be a teleological assumption, but it is at the same
time an evolutional heresy. It would never be fruitful to try
to connect the different variations o ffered, e.g. by the nervous
system, throughout the animal kingdom, if similar assump-
tions were admitted, for there would be then quite as much to
say for a repeated and independent origin of central nervous
systems out of indifferent epiblast just as required in each
special case. These would be steps that might bring us back a
good way towards the doctrine of independent creations. The
remembrance of Darwin’s, Huxley’s, and Gegenbaur’s classical
foundations, and of Balfour’s and Weismann’s brilliant super-
structures, ought to warn us away from these dangerous regions.
INDEX TO VOL £XVIL
NEW
SERIES.
Aniline dyes used in staining Bacteria,
by Hankin, 401
Antedon rosacea, symbiotic alge
in, by P. H. Carpenter, 379
Anthea cereus, chromatology of,
by MacMunn, 573
Bacteria, aniline dyes used in stain-
ing, by Hankin, 401
Benham on Criodrilus lacuum,
561
», studies on Earthworms, No.
i, 77;..No. TE, 561
Bourne, G. C., on the anatomy of
Fungia, 293
Carpenter, P. H., on symbiotic alge
in Antedon rosacea, 379
Chelonia, germinal layers of, by Mit-
sukuri and Ishikawa, 17
Chromatology of Anthea cereus,
by MacMunn, 573
Criodrilus lacuum, by Benham,
561
Criodrilus lacuum, by Orley, 551
Ctenodrilus parvulus, nov. spec.,
by Robert Scharff, 591
Cunningham on reproductive elements
of Myxine, 49
Bs review of Dohrn’s in-
quiries into the evolution of organs
in the Chordata, 265
Dinophilus gigas, by Weldon, 109
Dohrn on the evolution of organs in
the Chordata (review), 265
Earthworms, studies on, by Benham,
No. II, 77; No. III, 561
Kchinoderm morphology, No. X, by
P. H. Carpenter, 379
Eyes of Molluscs and Arthropods,
review of Patten’s memoir on, 285
Fowler on anatomy of Madreporaria, 1
Fungia, anatomy of, by Gilbert C.
Bourne, 293
Hankin, new methods of using the
aniline dyes for staining Bacteria,
401
Harmer on the life-history of Pedi-
cellina, 239
Hartog, liberation of the zoospores in
the Saprolegniex, 427
Heape on the development of the
Mole (Talpa), 123
Hubrecht on the relations of the
Nemertea and Vertebrata, 605
Ishikawa and Mitsukuri on the ger-
minal layers of Chelonia, 17
Lacertilia, pineal eye of, by Spencer,
165
646
Lendenfeld on the function of nettle-
cells, 393
Liver, nerves of, by Macallum, 439
Macallum on the uuclei of striated
muscle-fibre in Necturus, 461
», onthe termination of nerves
in the liver, 439
MacMunn on the chromatology of
Anthea cereus, 573
Madreporaria, anatomy of, by G.
H. Fowler, 1
Mitsukuri and Ishikawa on the ger-
minal layers of Chelonia, 17
Mole, development of the, by Heape,
123
Muscle-fibre, nuclei of, in Necturus,
by Macallum, 461
Myxine, reproductive elements of,
by Cunningham, 49
Nemertea and Vertebrata, relations
of, by Hubrecht, 605
Nerves, termination of, in the liver,
by A. B. Macallum, 439
Nettle-cells, function of, by Dr. R.
v. Lendenfeld, 393
Orley on Criodrilus lacuum, 551
Patten on the eyes of Molluses and
Arthropods (review), 285
Pedicellina, life-history of, by
Sydney F. Harmer, 239
INDEX.
Peripatus, development of, by
Adam Sedgwick, 461
Petromyzon, development of, by
Shipley, 325
Phytophthora infestans, life-
history of, by H. Marshall Ward,
413
Pineal eye of Lacertilia, by Spencer,
165
Saprolegniew, liberation of zoo-
spores in the, by Hartog, 427
Scharff on Ctenodrilus parvulus,
591
Sedgwick on the development of the
Cape species of Peripatus, 461
Shipley on the development of Petro-
myzon, 325
Smith, W. Robert, on the ammoniacal
decomposition of urine, 371
Spencer on the pineal eye of Lacer-
tilia, 165
Talpa, development of, by Heape, 123
Urine, ammoniacal decomposition of,
by W. Robert Smith, 371
Vertebrata and Nemertea, relations
of, by Hubrecht, 605
Ward, Marshall, on the life-history of
Phytophthora infestans, 413
Weldon on Dinophilus gigas, 109
PRINTED BY ADLARD AND SON, BARTHOLOMEW CLOSE.
na
re
WVU
Date Due
POE
me Pol ee
ee penne ee OED ire Dg
eee renw