7 Naty tee f / & 7% J ae 2226 pale Library of the Museum OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY, AT HARVARD COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, MASS. Sounded by private subscription, in 1861. Deposited by ALEX. AGASSIZ. Jin Na fia ivy: y x i su i " Bea bae een a op al i) i Alin oun tpi INGA Toit nut an eee i ; we Mc A) Pier ‘ i th i ! oi } } i. . tp) ‘ Pi] Y i } fait ts. - e hy | ' 1 / . i ® 4y } 4 1 y i! LISP LL QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPICAL SCIENCE: EDITED BY E. RAY LANKESTER, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., Fellow of Exeter College, Oxford, and Jodrell Professor of Zoology in University College, London ; WITH THE CO-OPERATION OF W. T. THISELTON DYER, M.A., C.M.G., F.R.S., Assistant Director of the Royal Gardens, Kew ; E. KLEIN, M.D., F.R.S., Joint-Lecturer on General Anatomy and Physiology in the Medical School of St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London ; H. N. MOSELEY, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., Linacre Professor of Human and Comparative Anatomy in the University of Oxford, AND ADAM SEDGWICK, M.A., F.BS., Fellow and Assistant-Lecturer of Trinity College, Cambridge. VOLUME XXVII.—NeEw Sertrs. ith Arthographic Plates and Engrabings on Wood, LONDON: J. & A. CHURCHILL, 11, NEW BURLINGTON STREET. 1887. = a, A Oe a mt ONE LGe. ) yal ‘ TvTe! PVapewe + om t sh aA a) 060m ee HG Vi cP er ee) it find i | g pia ~- , cet ul ee : ) its axing + > : ~ e’y d \ i La tend) 1 iby bree a? & cae Ge oe, a ein’ . of °F rl py ge vrerit ’ * } ¥ Vi ; co ie YG at ee AE 7 i ‘ary en ae n "Vee ha # ay @ ? 4 ta At Giga ET ‘a CONTENTS. CONTENTS: OF No: CVON.S. 7 AUGUST, 1886. MEMOIRS : The Anatomy of the Madreporaria: Il. By G. Herspert Fow rr, B.A., Keble College, Oxon., Berkeley Fellow of the Owens College, Manchester. (With Plate 1) : : On the Formation of the Germinal Layers in Chelonia. By K. Mirsuxuri, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology, and C. Isurkawa, Assistant in Zoology, University of Tokyo, Japan. (With Plates TET LV; and) V) On the Structure and Development of the ‘peteanane Hlerients in Myxine glutinosa, L. By J. T. Cunninenam, B.A., Fellow of University College, Oxford, and Superintendent of the Scottish Marine Station. (With Plates VI and VIT) Studies on Earthworms. No. II. By Witiiam Braxtanp Ben- HAM, B.Sc., Demonstrator in the Zoological Laboratory of University College, London. (With Plates VIII and IX) On Dinophilus Gigas. By W. F. R. Wetnoy, M.A., Fellow of St. John’s College, Cambridge; Lecturer on Invertebrate Morpho- logy to the University. (With Plate X) CONTENTS OF No. CVI, N.S., OCTOBER, 1886. MEMOIRS: The Development of the Mole (Talpa Europea). Stages E to J. By Watrer Hearn, M.A., Resident Superintendent of the Plymouth Laboratory of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. (With Plates XI, XII and XIII) On the Presence and Structure of the Pineal Eye in Lacertilia. By W. Batpwin Spencer, B.A., Fellow of Lincoln College; Assistant to the Linacre Pro‘essor of Human and Comparative Anatomy in the University of Oxford. (With Plates XLV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX and XX) PAGE 17 49 77 109 123 165 lv CONTENTS. On the Life-History of Pedicellina. By Srpyey F. Harmer, B.A., B.Sc., Fellow of King’s College, Cambridge, and of University College, London. (With Plates XXI and XXII) : Dr. Dohrn’s Inquiries into the Evolution of Organs in the Chordata. By J. T. Cunnineuam, B.A., F.R.S.E. . REVIEW : Patten on the Eyes of Molluses and Arthropods CONTENTS OF No. CVII, N.S., JANUARY, 1887. MEMOIRS : The Anatomy of the Madreporarian Coral Fungia. By GrLBert C. Bourne, B.A., F.L.S., New College, Oxford. (With Plates XXIII, XXIV “al XXV) 3 On Some Points in the Development of Petuaneen aba: By Artuur E. Suiptzy, B.A., Christ’s College, Cambridge, Demonstrator of Comparative Anatomy in the University. (With Plates XXVI, XXVIJ, XXVIIT and XXIX) The Ammoniacal Decomposition of Urine. By Wm. Rosert Smitu, M.D., D.Sc., F.R.S.Ep., Examiner in Chemistry and Forensic Medicine, University of Aberdeen. (With Plate XXX, figs. 1 and 2) Notes on Echinoderm Morphology, No. x. On the Sipneea Presence of Symbiotic Alge in Antedon rosacea. By P. HERBERT CaRventer, D.Sc., F.R.S., F.L.S., Assistant Master at Eton College. (With Plate XXX, fig. 3) : : The Function of Nettlecells. By R. von Lenprenretp, Pu.D., F.L.S., Assistant in the Zoological Laboratory of University Col- lege, London. (With Plate XXX, fig. 4) : Some New Methods of Using the Aniline Dyes for akin Bacteria. By E. Hanpury Hankin : Illustrations of the Structure and Life-History of Phytophekoee infestans, the Fungus causing the Potato Disease. By H. MarsHatt Warp, M.A., F.L.S., Fellow of Christ’s College, Cambridge, and Professor of Botany in the Forestry School, Royal Indian College, Cooper’s Hill. (With Plates XXXI and XXXII) On the Formation and Liberation of the Zoospores in the Sapro- legniee. By Marcus M. Harroe, D.Sc., M.A.,, F.R.U.L. PAGE 239 265 285 293 325 371 379 393 401 413 427 CONTENTS. CONTENTS OF No. CVIII, N.S., MARCH, 1887. MEMOIRS : The Termination of Nerves in the Liver. By A. B. Macatium, B.A., Fellow of University College, Toronto, Canada. (With Plate XXXIII, figs. 1 to 6) : On the Nuclei of the Striated Muscle- Fibre i in Mananis (Meno- branchus) lateralis. By A. B. Macatuum, B.A., Fellow of University College, Toronto, Canada. (With Plate XXXIII, figs. A and B) : : : The Development of the Cape Speties of Penuarae: Part III. On the Changes from Stage a to Stage Fr. By Apam Sepewicx, M.A., F.R.S., Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. (With Plates XXXIV, XXXV, XXXVI and XXXVII) ; Morphological and Biological Observations on Criodrilus lacuum, Hoffmeister. By Dr. L. Ortsy, Zoolog. Instit. University of Budapest. (With Plate XXXVIII, figs. 1 to 8) Studies on Earthworms. No. III. Criodrilus lacuum, Hof. meister. By Witttam Braxtanp Benuam, B.Sc., Demonstrator in the Zoological Laboratory of University College, London. (With Plate XXXVIII, figs. 9 to 19) : : 5 Notes on the Chromatology of Antheacereus. By C. A. Mac Muny, M.A., M.D. (With Plates XXXIX and XL) On Ctenodrilus parvulus, nov. spec. By Ropert ScHarrr, B.Sc., Po.D. (With Plate XLI) ; , The Relation of the Nemertea to the Wertsrata: By A. A. W. Husrecut, Professor in Utrecht. (With Plate XLII) InDEX PAGE 439 461 467 551 561 573 591 605 645 The Anatomy of the Madreporaria: II. By G. Herbert Fowler, B.A., Keble College, Oxon., Berkeley Fellow of the Owens College, Manchester. With Plate I. In a previous paper (4), I have described the anatomy of a solitary Imperforate coral, Flabellum; and of a branching Perforate, Rhodopsammia. The present memoir treats of two examples of colonial Perforate forms, Madrepora Durvillei and M. aspera. Maprerora Durvitier (Milne-Edw. and Haime). Two fragments of this perforate Madreporarian were kindly entrusted to me for study by Professor H. N. Moseley, who had obtained them during the voyage of H.M.S. “Challenger.” The species was founded by Milne-Edwards (1) from a part of the M. rosea of Esper, but as his account is very incom- plete, Mr. J. J. Quelch, of the British Museum, has furnished the following description of the coral. I am glad to be able to take occasion to thank him for this and many other courtesies. A. “Corallum arborescent, spreading, and remotely ra- mose, or occasionally sub-prostrate, and almost destitute of branchlets on the under surface. Branches often nearly 2 em. thick, becoming very thin towards their extremity, sub- terete, elongated, covered irregularly with crowded capillary polyp-bearing branchlets, which generally give to the branches a sub-cylindrical outline of about 3—5 mm. in diameter. VOL, XXVII, PART 1,—NEW SER, A 2 G. HERBERT FOWLER. Branchlets small and short, about 1—2 cm. in length, con- sisting generally of a few thin and long tubiform calicles ; towards the apical parts of the branches they become much less elongated and often quite short. Surface slightly porous, very distinctly costulated throughout, and marked with fine echinulations which are very distinctly arranged on the calicles. Calicles generally tubiform, about 15 mm. wide and 1: cm. long, except towards the apical parts of the branches, where they are shorter and smaller, and sometimes tubo- nariform; a few short tubonariform calicles are generally placed on the surface of the branches between the branchlets. Star distinct, of six more or less lamelli-spiniform septa, two of which, the distal and the proximal, are usually much enlarged, and meet one another, often deep down in the fossa ; while occasionally, as in the terminal calicles, the six septa are subequal, and coalesce at the centre.” «This species seems to be distinguishable from the M. echinata (Dana) simply by the costulations of the surface, which in the latter is smooth or finely granulated. It is doubtful, however, whether this character will prove to be sufficiently constant to separate the two species, when a larger number of forms has been examined.” Figs. 1 and 2 represent the dorsal and ventral aspects of a fragment of a branch, and show most of the characteristics mentioned in the above description. In a transverse section of the corallum (fig. 3), the peri- pheral ring of polyp cavities is cut somewhat obliquely (a a.), owing to the inclination of branchlets and calicles to the branch; while the more central ones, cut at a lower level and more transversely, are approximately circular in outline (a’ a’.). They lie, roughly speaking, on three sides of the branch, none are apparent on the fourth. The shorter radius of the latter seems to imply that the growth in diameter of the branch depends upon the outward growth of the polyps. In the axis of the branch is a central cavity (c. c.), into which project six septum-like ridges ; this probably represents a cavity previously inhabited by the now apical polyp. The THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 3 tops of both my specimens having been broken off, I have not been able to prove this; nor again to investigate the method of budding; but in M. aspera is such another central cavity with six septa, which is continuous with that of the apical polyp. All other polyp cavities converge towards, and, by means of canals, eventually open into, this central cavity, but no more definite connection is traceable. Tissues not unlike mesenteries are sometimes visible in it, but the alcohol in which the speci- mens were killed did not penetrate sufficiently rapidly to preserve the central parts in good histological condition. In some sections the six septa are not recognisable, and the axis of the branch is occupied by a wide-meshed network of coral ; this is probably due to reabsorption of part of the skeleton. In transverse section are also seen concentric series of lon- gitudinal canals (c*.) permeating the corallum; their arrangement appears to indicate that the radial growth of the branch is effected in the following manner. Directly beneath the external body wall of the colony a series of longitudinal canals runs between the cost (fig. 4, c') ; and it is probable that, for increase in the diameter of the branch, the costz grow outwards, and then, bulging laterally, fuse over these canals, so as to enclose them entirely in corallum (cf. fig. 10, v.). Thus there results a series of internal longitudinal canals, concen- trically arranged, with radi of coral between them which represent former cost. Not only does the appearance of such a transverse section as fig. 3 suggest that this is the mode of growth, but also “ dark lines of growth” (fig. 5) run radially from each costa towards the centre, so continuously as to indi- cate that what was a costa when the diameter of the branch was very small, has continued to grow as such, and to be still such, when the diameter is very much larger. New coste, when required owing to the increased circumference of the branch, appear to take their origin from the point of fusion of previous costz. More minutely, growth is effected, presumably by the activity of calycoblast cells, through the addition to and for- mation of crystalline ellipsoids, similar to those described A G. HERBERT FOWLER. by v. Koch in Stylophora (2). These ellipsoids have a distinct sweep from one “ line of growth” to the next. The calyces are all of approximately the same size, and that so minute as to render investigation of the anatomy difficult. The septa are very irregular of occurrence; the complete number appears to be six, but three are rarely to be seen in one section, often none at all. They are not constant through the whole depth of the polyp cavity, but occur as discontinuous ridges (fig. 6, Ad.). In every polyp, however, either an axial or abaxial septum is present, which enables the orientation of the polyp to be effected as in the Alcyonaria. (These terms, axial and abaxial, are used in preference to the ordinary and mis- leading “dorsal”? and “ ventral,” and were suggested originally by Professor Milnes Marshall, ‘Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin.,’ 1883.) There is no columella, but often the axial and abaxial septa fuse, low down in the polyp cavity, so as to divide it into two equal halves (fig. 3, a’), in a manner suggestive of the “median plate” in Pocillopora and Seriatopora figured by Professor Moseley (3). The costz bear apparently no relation to the septa in the well-grown colony, whatever may have been the case in the founder-polyp. Not only is no connection traceable between them in a transverse section of the branch, but even in a single polyp standing off from the stem, where the number of septa is under the most favorable conditions but six, about twenty costz surround the calicle. sp. Anatomy.—The whole of the corallum is covered exter- nally by a definite body wall of ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm (fig. 6, ext. b. w., fig. 4, ect. me. en.), immediately beneath which lie, as in Rhodopsammia, external longitu- dinal canals parallel to the long axis of the corallum (figs. 3, 4, 6, c'). These, however, are not the result of the same anatomical relations in both cases ; in Rhodopsammia, lamellee of mesoderm with a layer of endoderm on each side are given off from the external body wall, and unite with the endoderm THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 5 and mesoderm which clothe the exterior surface of the theca ; and into the canals thus formed project the costa. In M. Durvillei, the layer of endoderm and mesoderm which is immediately apposed to the exterior surface of the corallum, rises in a ridge towards the external body wall; and at the points where these layers meet and fuse are formed the coste, i.e. in the angle of the mesoderm ; and therefore between the cost lie the canals. A comparison of fig. 4 with (4) fig. 17 will make clear the anatomical difference. There is thus no trace of any structure resembling the “ peri- pheral continuations of the mesenteries of v. Koch.” These canals appear to open over the lip of the calyces into the polyp cavities ; they are connected with each other trans- versely between the spikes (echinulations) of the costz (figs. 6,7); and further, by radial canals (figs. 3, 4, c3.) they open into the internal longitudinal canals, which I believe, as above stated, to have, at an earlier period in the history of the branch, occupied a position similarly external to the corallum. The whole system which thus perforates the corallum, and allows free current of fluid to even the most remote parts of the colony, is lined by endoderm and mesoderm throughout, and opens into similarly lined polyp cavities. The general structure of the colony is, therefore, (1) an external body wall, under which and between the cost lies (2) a series of external longitudinal canals opening into each other, and also through the corallum, into (3) the internal canals, mainly longitudinal, with radial and trans- verse connections, communicating in their turn with (4) the celentera of the polyps. Into the last the external longitudinal canals also open directly, through the theca. The whole system is of course merely a complication of the primi- tive coelenteron. Of the polyps there are at least two distinct types, which are full of interest as constituting the first record of marked dimorphism among the Madreporaria. Both are Actinian in structure. Type A has in the highest sections twelve perfectly normal 6 G. HERBERT FOWLER. mesenteries, and a stomatodeum which is a simple invagina- tion of the external body wall. A little way down in the polyp, six of the mesenteries, in every case the same six, assume a curious modification of structure, which wil] be described first as seen in a series of transverse sections. Fig. 8 represents the characteristic features of a polyp of this type; the mesenteries numbered 2, 4, 6, 7,9, 11 are those which undergo modification, and are diagrams of a series of drawings made from the same mesentery with camera lucida at different heights. There appears first (fig. 8.2) an involution of the stomato- deeum directed towards the mesentery, on the floor of which the ectodermic cells are long, but shorter at the sides. By fusion of the mesoderm and obliteration of the ectoderm on each side of this involution, a small canal with a definite lumen is found to be pinched off, and to lie enclosed in the mesoderm lamella of the mesentery (fig. 8.4). In the neigh- bourhood of this involution, the endodermic cells lining the mesenterial chamber become enormously lengthened and vacuo- lated, though the layer is still apparently only one cell deep. Some sections lower down in the polyp (fig. 8 ), another similar involution appears in the stomatodzum, in which the ectodermic cells are short on the floor, but pass into deeper ones at the sides; this similarly results in the enclosure of what appears to be a second canal in the centre of the mesen- tery (fig. 8.7). In the first canal, as is shown in the diagram, the longer ectoderm cells face towards the stomatodzum ; in the second away from it. Further down yet, where the stomatodzeum ceases, the free edge of the mesentery is enlarged into a perfectly normal filament (fig. 8.9); and finally (fig. 8.11), the whole modifica- tion disappears suddenly, the two canals meeting below; the mesentery then presents a perfectly normal appearance, namely, a mesoderm lamella with a layer of small endodermic cubical cells on each side of it, and bearing the usual filament. The compilation of these sections, which I have attempted to express in fig. 6 M, shows that on an ordinary mesentery THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 7 occurs a swelling due to elongation of the endoderm cells, through which runs, in the mesoderm, a canal lined by ecto- derm, doubled back on itself, and opening at both ends into the stomatodzeum, with the ectoderm of which its lining is continuous. Of twenty-one polyps examined, seven present this modifi- cation of six (and in all cases of the same six) mesenteries, namely, those numbered 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, according to the method employed in the diagram ; the other six mesenteries, 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, and all the twelve mesenteries of the other polyps, are perfectly normal, and show no tendency to such a modification. Were it possible to explain the sectional appear- ances by a contortion of the mesentery, the regularity with which it occurs would be sufficient proof that it is a definite modification of structure, the parallel of which has yet to be sought in the Anthozoa. The unmodified mesenteries in Type A, generally die out before the plane of the opening of stomatodzeum into celen- teron is reached, in transverse sections. If they present a fila- ment, which is seldom the case, it is of the same character as that figured (fig. 8.11), i.e. identical with that of a modified mesentery ; more frequently none is present, or at most a slight endodermal swelling on the free edge. The mesenteries 4, 9, run very much deeper into the corallum than the others. Type B, of about the same diameter as A, is of the normal Actinian structure. The twelve mesenteries are simple, and exactly like those unmodified in Type A. Most of them die out after a very short course, but those numbered 2, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11, on the same notation as in fig. 8, present a more developed fila- ment than the other six, and extend further down into the corallum, and of these 4, 9, have by far the longest course, and are the only ones that bear ova. We have thus two distinct types of polyp, the one distin- guished only for entire normality ; the other with a hitherto undescribed form of mesentery. In both is observable a differ- entiation affecting the same six mesenteries, exhibited in the 8 G. HERBERT FOWLER. one case as a tendency to a longer course, and to the more complete development of the filament; im the other as the peculiar modification described above ; and in both types two of these six have of all the longest course, and are, so far as I have observed, the only ones that bear reproductive organs. Neither type is confined to certain areas of the branch, but both appear to be irregularly distributed. Tentacles are not recognisable in my specimens, but it is probable that in the living animal they occur as slight evagina- tions of the chambers, and have shrunk under the action of the alcohol in which the polyps were killed. Muscles are obviously present on the mesoderm lamella of the mesenteries, but owing to their minute size it is impossible to detect how they are arranged. I see no reason to doubt that they agree with Actinia. So far as it is possible to judge without this clue, the septa are entoceelic. c. Histology.—There is but little to be said under this head, except as regards the modified mesentery, an almost transverse section of which is represented in fig. 9. ‘The state of the specimens did not allow of an exhaustive study of cell structure, but those cells, the elongation of which causes the peculiar swelling on both surfaces of the mesentery, are apparently simply lengthened, much vacuolated, and ameceboid at their free ends. No food particles were detected in them, or indeed in any other part, but many zooxanthellz are embedded amongst them. ‘These cells pass gradually into the ordinary endoderm, and their appearance suggests strongly that their condition is merely an exaggeration of that of the “ Flimmerstreifen”’ of the brothers Hertwig, i.e. of the two lateral lobes of the mesenterial filament. In a recent paper (5) Dr. Wilson has suggested that these lateral lobes are ectodermic in origin, circulatory in function, and homologous with the “ectodermic bands” described by him on the axial mesenteries of certain Alcyonaria. I may here state that, so far as histological evidence from the adult is valuable, it points, in all the Madreporaria that I have yet examined, distinctly in the other direction. The central THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 9 “ Nesseldriisenstreifen” have precisely the same microscopic appearance as the stomatodzeal ectoderm; while the “ Flim- merstreifen,” im the unbroken gradation by which they pass into the endoderm, and by their characteristic staining, seem to be much more nearly connected with that layer than with the ectoderm, and to exhibit an intermediate condition between the ordinary cubical or pavement cells of the endoderm and the enormously lengthened cells of M. Durvillei. v. Heider (6), on the same grounds, had previously come to the same con- clusion with regard to Cerianthus. The ova, which in my specimens were few in number, are surrounded by a mesodermal capsule, and possess the ordinary structure. In the one case, in which an ovum was observed on a modified mesentery, it was borne on the neck between the endodermic swelling and the mesenterial filament. p. General Conclusions. — This form has four interesting features in common with the Alcyonaria (Octactiniz) : 1. The marked tendency to an absence of polyps on one (the ventral) side of the branch and branchlets. 2. The very definite orientation of the polyps by a stronger development of axial and abaxial septa; and the concomitant bilateral symmetry, the plane of bisection being at right angles to the long axis of the branch or branchlet. 3. The differentiation of mesenteries, which, confined in the Alcyonaria to two, is here extended to six, and more particu- larly to two of these, though not the same two as in the other group. 4. The distinct dimorphism. Of the true significance of this dimorphism no certain explanation can be gathered from this form studied merely by itself; it can only be resolved by a comparative study of allied species. Differentiation of function appears to be incomplete ; both forms are reproductive, both apparently digestive. The most that can be said is that A is, perhaps, more digestive and less reproductive than B, for the filaments are more deve- loped than in the latter form, and I have only once observed an ovum on a modified mesentery. Should the modification 10 G. HERBERT FOWLER. be digestive in function, as is probably the case, A might certainly be termed a “‘ gastrozooid.” But at present any explanation of the function of the struc- ture above described, cannot be other than a mere speculation. It cannot be regarded as a necessary result of the colonial habit, since nothing similar occurs in the next species to be described—M. aspera. It can hardly be connected with re- production, as ova are of rarer occurrence in the modified than in the unmodified polyps; and an excretory apparatus is not required by an organism whose cells are capable of amceboid activity, egestion as well as ingestion. The only evidence on the point is derived from the distribu- tion of the zooxanthelle. These are most plentiful, firstly, in the external canals just under the body wall; and secondly, among the elongated cells of the mesentery. Assuming, as we may fairly do, that nutriment and aération were the determin- ing factors of such distribution, it would seem that, in the first case, there must be a strong current of nutritive “ chyle- aqueous fluid” (to use a word of the older zoologists) in these external canals, and that aération was effected by diffusion of oxygen through the body wall from the surrounding medium ; and in the second place, that the elongated vacuolated cells of the mesentery were in some way assimilative, while oxygenation of the tissues for these special digestive processes (and there- fore secondarily and accidentally to the benefit of these symbiotic alge), resulted from a constant stream of water flowing through the central ectodermal canal of the mesentery. That such a stream does pass through this canal is extremely probable, for the longer ectodermic cells are all morphologi- cally on the same side of the canal; a wave of ciliary action must therefore result in a current through the canal from one of the apertures into the stomatodeum towards the other. A comparison of fig. 8.7 with fig. 6 mw will explain this arrange- ment of the cells. It is interesting to note that in M. Durvillei, as in Alcyonaria and Antipatharia, two mesenteries are distinguished THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 11 from the rest by running far deeper into the corallum or rachis. This may be a specialisation for circulatory purposes, as has been shown by Dr. Wilson to be true for certain Alcyo- naria, or connected with production of the generative elements, as is the case in Antipatharia; in M. Durvillei certainly the latter, perhaps also the former, holds good. Maprepora AsPEeRA (Dana). For a fragment of this coral, fortunately the upper part of a branch, I am again indebted to Professor Moseley. The species was founded by Dana (7), who gives a good figure of the colony. A. Corallum.—A transvers esection of the corallum (fig. 10) shows that the polyp cavities (a a’) are arranged in a definite ring, and not merely confined to three sides as in M. Durvillei, round a central cavity into which project six septa, more or less fused together at their free edges. This central cavity (c. c.) is continuous with that of the apical polyp of the branch. The arrangement of the internal longitudinal canals is not so definitely concentric as in M. Durvillei, but the method of circumferential growth of the corallum appears to be similar in both species, since the costz appear to fuse over the external longitudinal canals (v. fig. 10, z, and p. 3). In the apical polyps are found six distinct entoccelic septa, and six smaller exoccelic, of which all are not always present ; in the others generally only an axial or abaxial septum. A similar difference between them was observed by v. Koch (8) in M. variabilis, where both exosepta and entosepta were present in the apical polyps, but entosepta only in the rest. In this form, as in the former species, there appears to be no relation in number and position between cost and septa, the former being by far the most numerous. The cost are apparently formed as in M. Durvillei, that is, at the points where the endoderm and mesoderm apposed to the exterior surface of the corallum touch the external body wall (v. p. 5 and fig. 4), but in both species, owing to alcoholic contraction, the latter has so shrunk on to 12 G. HERBERT FOWLER. the corallum that the cost project through it, and the exact conditions are difficult to determine with certainty. B. Anatomy.—The general anatomy of the colony, as regards the relations of canals, body wall, polyp cavities, &c., agrees with that of M. Durvillei. Beyond the fact that in M. aspera the polyp cavities are placed closer together, and that therefore there are fewer canals in the corallum, there is little or no difference between them. As regards the polyps, how- ever, there is no dimorphism; all the polyps, except those which are obviously immature buds, are identical in structure. A typical polyp possesses twelve perfectly normal mesen- teries, and a stomatodeum which is a simple invagination of the external body wall. When numbered on the same system as in M. Durvillei, it is found that those mesenteries marked 1, 2, 4, 6,7, 9, 11, 12, are the ones which develop mesen- terial filaments, that is, the same mesenteries as in M. Durvillei, with the addition of the abaxial “ directives ;” while the others, 3, 5, 8, 10, generally have no filament, and do not extend to the bottom of the stomatodeum. The apical polyps are about twice the size of the others, but, except for their possession of more septa, are identical in structure with them. The muscles in both apical and lateral polyps are arranged on the mesenteries just as in Actinia, and present nothing unusual in structure. Tentacles I was unable to recognise, macroscopically or by sections, but a figure by Dana shows that they are present, and twelve in number. In this, as in the species last described, they have shrunk into insignificance, owing to the action of the spirit in which the specimens were preserved. They agree with M. variabilis, in which, according to v. Koch, they are also exoccelic and entoccelic. The histology calls for no remark, agreeing with that of forms already described. Calycoblasts were very distinctly present in the growing parts of the colony. c. Method of Budding.—With regard to this, I have been able to gléan but little information ; since the immature polyps THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 13 are so crowded with zooxanthellz, owing presumably to the amount of nutriment supplied to them, that the tissues are much obscured. The stomatodzeum is invaginated to a considerable depth into the future polyp cavity before it is perforated for com- munication between the ceelenteron and the exterior, and also apparently before any mesenteries are formed. The cavity into which it is invaginated is already of considerable diameter, and larger than the ordinary canals of the colony; though smaller than that of a fully formed polyp, at that point it is probably never enlarged by reabsorption of coral, but its con- tinuation upwards by future growth of the polyp possesses a gradually increasing diameter. In a young polyp in which the stomatodeum was invagi- nated, but not yet perforated below, the latter appeared to be supported by tissue surrounding the future septa, just as the external body wall is supported by tissue enclosing the costz. In sections below the stomatodzum, and unconnected with it, were seen two small mesenteries with filaments, which appeared to be growing upwards towards the stomatodzum, and to have not yet joined it. It is therefore possible that these grow upwards from the canal system, and are formed quite inde- pendently of the rest of the polyp. This view is further supported by the observation that, in sections quite at the top of a branch, above the plane of any lateral polyps, occur in the canals one, sometimes two, little mesenteries with fila- ments, which I believe to be growing upwards towards the sites of future polyps. They appear to take rise, near the cavity of the apical polyp, from the wall of the canals. In the only other stage of development from which any observations could be made six mesenteries had appeared ; of these the two furthest from the axis carried muscles on the outer faces, though it does not necessarily follow that they were the abaxial “directives” of the adult. The muscles of the other two pairs were not sufficiently developed to allow of their arrangement being recognised. Conclusion—From M,. Durvillei, the present species is 14 G. HERBERT FOWLER. widely separated by a strong morphological distinction, the absence of dimorphism; since the difference between the apical and lateral polyps in M. aspera is hardly strong enough to be reckoned as such. That such a distinction should exist between two species of a genus is very remarkable; but, con- sidering the great antiquity of these forms, the similar struc- ture of the colony in both, and the fact that they exhibit a similar differentiation of certain mesenteries, it is not to be inferred that their systematic relations are unsound. Nore. For microscopic sections through both hard and soft parts of the coral, such as are figured in (4) Pl. XLI, figs. 14, 15, I have found the method, originally applied by v. Koch to these forms, extremely useful. The coral, having been left in borax carmine for three days, and treated with acidulated alcohol for six hours, is transferred to absolute alcohol, and from this to ether; into the ether is dropped absolutely dry powdered Canada balsam in small quantities at a time, till enough is dis- solved to make a block, rather larger when dry than the speci- men. The ether is driven off by a gentle heat, leaving the coral permeated throughout by balsam. About a week should be devoted to this part of the process. Sections are then cut with a lapidary wheel, or, if this is not procurable, with afret saw ; and ground like geological sections on a slate, then polished on a water of Ayr stone. Oil and emery powder should be avoided, water alone being used for the stones. One surface of the section having been ground and polished, it should be affixed permanently by that surface to a glass slide, on to which some dry Canada balsam has been melted, and not again be moved. When the other surface has been similarly ground and polished to the required thinness, it should be brushed lightly, first with absolute alcohol, then immediately with oil of cloves; this removes all dirt from the surface. A drop of balsam in benzole is then placed on the section, and the cover glass lightly dropped on it. THE ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIA. 15 ERRATUM. In my previous paper (4) Pl. XL, fig. 1°, the septa were wrongly numbered ; they should have been marked 1, 4, 3, 4, 2, 4, 3, 4, 1, reckoning on each side from the central “ direc- tive’ septum, D. LITERATURE. 1. Mitnz-Epwarps.—‘ Hist. Nat. d. Coralliaires,’ iii, p. 148. 2. von Kocu.—‘ Jen. Zeitschr.,’ Bd. xi. 3. MospetEy.—‘ Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci.,’ Oct., 1882. 4, FowLer.—‘ Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci.,’ Oct., 1885. 5. Witson.—‘ Mitth. Zool. Sta. Neap.,’ Bd. v. 6. von Herppr.—‘ Sitz. k. Akad. Wissench.,’ 1879. 7. Dana.— Zoophytes of the Wilkes Expedition.’ 8. v. Kocu.—‘ Morph. Jahrb.,’ Bd. vi. DESCRIPTION OF PLATE I, Illustrating Mr. G. Herbert Fowler’s Paper on “ The Anatomy of the Madreporaria.” a. Polyp cavities, cut obliquely. a’. Polyp cavities, cut transversely. 4d. Abaxial (ventral) septum. 4. Axial (dorsal) septum. C. Coste. c.c. Cen- tral cavity, continuous with the apical polyp. _c!. External longitudinal canals between the coste. c*. Internal longitudinal canals. c*. Radial and trans- verse connecting canals. Co. Corallum of the main branch. d. Cut edges of the endoderm and mesoderm lining the celenteron. ect. Ectoderm. ex. En- doderm. ext. b. w. External body wall of ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. M. Mesentery, showing the endodermal swelling. me. Mesoderm lamella. S. Septum. S.C. Septal Columella-plate. St. Stomatodeum. 7%. Theca of polyp. Z. Zooxanthelle. 2. Fusion of coste over ext. long. canals. All except Fig. 10 are from Madrepora Durvillei. Fie. 1.—Dorsal view of the corallum of two fragments of a branch, bearing calicles, and branchlets formed of other calicles. Fie. 2.—Ventral view of the same specimens ; one of which is entirely bare of calicles on this side, and on the other ouly a few are present. Fic. 3.—Transverse section of a branch, showing the polyp cavities, the central cavity, and the canals running in various directions. The concentric 16 G. HERBERT FOWLER. arrangement of the latter is well shown. Into the central cavity project the six septa. In two of the innermost ring of polyps, the axial and abaxial septa have fused into the septal columella-plate. Fic. 4.—Diagram of a transverse section of a polyp and of part of the branch. The external body wall is shown to be supported on the cost, as its mesoderm and endoderm are continuous with those lying on the outer face of the corallum. The polyp cavity shows at this point twelve mesenteries supporting the stomatodeum. (In nature the mesoderm lies closely apposed to the surface of the corallum, and there is no space between them, such as is introduced into the diagram for clearness.) Fic. 5.—Transverse section of a portion of the branch, to show the lines of growth, running between the canals radially and terminating each in a costa. Fic. 6.—Diagram of a longitudinal section of a polyp along the dotted line in Fig. 8. The tentacles are omitted, as they were not recognisable in my specimens ; the canal system in the corallum is also omitted. On the left the section passes between the axial septum and mesentery No. 7, and above the polyp down an external longitudinal canal; on the right, through the abaxial septum and down a costa, of which the echinulations and the canals between them are shown. The numbers indicate the same mesenteries as in Fig. 8. On the mesentery 7 is figured the endodermal swelling, with the bent canal indicated by dotted lines. In the stomatodum are shown the two openings of the canals of mesenteries 7, 9, 11; and below the stomatodeum the free edges of these three mesenteries alone appear, the others dying out before this plane is reached. The dotted line indicates the junction of theca and septa, and the discontinuous character of the septum (42.) is clearly shown. Fic. 7.—The external body wall viewed from the exterior; the lighter spots are the places where the echinulations of the costs have pierced the body wall on account of its shrinkage. This drawing shows the arrangement of the external longitudinal canals, and their connections between the spikes of the costee. (Camera lucida.) Fic. 8.—Diagram of the various forms and conditions of the mesenteries in a polyp of Type A. Those numbered 1], 3, 5, 8, 10, 12 are unmodified and normal. The others, 2, 4, 6, 7,9, 11, are modified in all the polyps of this type; they are from camera lucida drawings of the same mesentery at different heights. The arrows and Roman numerals in Fig. 8 show the planes in which the successive sections are taken.—2 shows the endodermal swelling, and the upper opening of the canal; 6 shows the lower opening; 9 is below the stomatodeeum, and bears a filament; and in 11] no trace of the modification remains, the mesentery being normal, and similar to those of Type B. Fic. 9.—Transverse section of a modified mesentery, passing through both arms of the canal. Fic. 10.—Transverse section of the corallum of a branch of M. aspera. FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 17 On the Formation of the Germinal Layers in Chelonia. By K. Mitsukuri, Ph.D., Professor of Zoology, and Cc. Ishikawa, Assistant in Zoology, University of Tokyo, Japan. With Plates II, III, IV, and V. In the spring of 1884 we made the acquaintance of Mr. Hattori, the proprietor of a large fish-hatching establishment in Honjo, a suburb of Tokyo. His father before him, and he, had succeeded in making the snapping turtle—Trionyx Japo- nicus, Schlegel—breed freely and naturally in captivity, and thus in furnishing the market with a constant and large supply of its delicate flesh. In his farm hundreds of these turtles are annually hatched, and if the eggs are marked as they are laid the exact age of any given deposit can be determined with great precision, even to minutes in many cases. Such an opportunity for the investigation of Reptilian development seemed to us too good to be thrown away, especially as nobody had, so far as we were aware at the time, worked on the em- bryology of Chelonia since the days of Agassiz and Clark, and therefore with modern methods of investigation. Mr. Hattori kindly consenting, we went to his farm daily during the breeding season of 1884 and of 1885, and succeeded in collect- ing a fairly complete series of the Tryonix embryos, beginning VOL, XXVIJ, PART ].—NEW SER, B 18 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. with the time when the eggs are deposited, and ending with their hatching out. The present paper gives the results of our study on the formation of the germinal layers. Papers on other points and later stages of development will follow from time to time since the investigation is being continued, as the pressure of other duties permit us. We wish to return our warmest thanks to Mr. Hattori for cheerfully acceding to our numerous demands on his good nature, and for furthering greatly our work with his intelli- gent assistance. Thanks are also due to the authorities of the University of Tokyo for the payment of necessary expenses attending the investigation, and for the use of instruments, reagents, &c. Finally, we wish to express our deep obligations to Dr. Isao Jijima for valuable suggestions in regard to the methods of investigation. We made many interesting observations on the breeding habits of Trionyx, but we reserve these for some other occasion, as foreign to the purpose of this paper. We simply mention that the Trionyx eggs are nearly spherical in shape, and have a hard brittle shell like that of the fowl, and not leathery, as in some Chelonia. Their size is very variable, the smallest we measured being 10 mm., the largest 23 mm., the most usual size about 21—22 mm. in diameter. This difference in size seems to be due mostly to the size of the parent. With this we pass on at once to the consideration of the subject proper of the present communication. The earliest stage of which we will give a detailed description is taken from an egg opened directly after its deposition. Our attempts to obtain still earlier stages by opening pregnant females have proved but partially successful. In almost every case, with only some doubtful exceptions, the eggs we found in the oviduct were unfortunately fully as much advanced as those just laid. On opening an egg directly after its deposition the blasto- derm is always found at the pole turned above. The embryonic shield, with the pellucid area around it, stands out conspicuously as a small, nearly circular spot, on the yellow surface of the FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN OCHELONIA. 19 yolk. The general appearance of the embryonic shield at this stage is represented in fig. 1 @ and 34, enlarged about thirty diameters. Fig. 1 a, shows it as seen from the dorsal side, and fig. 1 6, as seen from the ventral side after the removal of the shield from the egg. The embryonic shield does not lie in the centre of the area pellucida (a. p.), but is placed excentri- cally nearer its hind end, so that here it is continuous with the area opaca (a. 0.). The ectoblast has already spread itself over a large part of the egg, although we did not determine its exact limits (see fig. 16). On the dorsal view the blastopore (d/., fig. 1 a) forms the most conspicuous feature ; it is seen as a wide transverse slit across the posterior part of the embryonic shield, occupying considerably more than one third of the breadth across. From the blastopore a passage leads obliquely forward and ventralward, and opens about in the centre of the ventral surface with a circular opening (v. 0.). The walls of the ventral opening are posteriorly quite high, but become gradually lower and lower toward the front, until they sink to the general level of the ventral surface. For the sake of brevity this passage, leading from the blastopore dorsally and opening below, we shall hereafter call the blastoporic passage. It becomes eventually the neurenteric canal. Returning to the dorsal surface, the shield in front of the blastopore presents a broad flat expanse, in which are seen indistinctly three opaque lines radiating from behind forward, like the prongs of a trident. On referring to the ventral side we see that the two lateral opaque lines correspond to the thickenings which form the walls of the inferior opening of the blastoporic passage. Accordingly they are thickest posteriorly, and gradually thin out toward the front. The middle prong of the trident cor- responds to the roof of the blastoporic passage, and its con- tinuation to the front edge of the embryonic shield. It is, in fact, the chorda entoblast, which is still in the process of formation in front, as will be made clear by sections. The remaining parts of the ventral surface not taken up by these three thickenings present the appearance of a honeycomb. Of this we shall speak later on. Coming back to the dorsal 20 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. surface again, the area behind the blastopore, especially the median longitudinal space, is on a lower level than the parts in front. This, the sections show us, is the line of the primitive streak. At the part where the embryonic shield posteriorly joins the area opaca there is a considerable transverse thicken- ing (s/.), shown both in the dorsal and ventral views—in the latter covered with yolk matter. This undoubtedly corresponds to the “sichel” or “sickle” which Kupffer describes in a similar Lacerta embryo (No. 5, Taf. i, fig. 1, s/.). We should add that these differences in level become much more con- spicuous after the embryonic shield has been removed and treated in reagents than when it is stretched over the yolk, and also that the embryos of this stage vary considerably in their surface views, especially when they are hardened. Figs. 7—15 are selected from the series of transverse sec- tions obtained from the embryo represented in figs. 1 @ and 6. The figures are arranged in order from behind forward. Figs. 7—9 pass through the part behind the blastopore, figs. 10, 11 through the blastoporic passage, and figs. 12—15 through the part in front of the blastopore. In fig. 7, the most posterior section represented, the ecto- blast extends over the whole, being two or three layers of cells thick in the embryonic shield, but gradually thinning out to a single layer of flat cells toward both sides. The yolk occupies the entire lower stratum. Nuclei (n.7.) are visiblein it. The space between the ectoblast and the yolk is occupied by a mass of mesoblast cells which is here distinctly separate from both the ectoblast and the yolk. In fig. 8 (which by the way is taken from another embryo of the same deposit, as the section corresponding to this in the first series is unfortunately injured) the ectoblast is continuous in the median line with the mesoblast, i. e. it is very actively proliferating and giving off cells abundantly to the mesoblast. Fig. 9 passes through the region directly behind the blasto- pore. The ectoblast is distinct laterally, but toward the median line, and at some distance from it, passes gradually into a mass of cells in which no layers can be distinguished. Dif- FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA, 21 ferent from fig. 8 where the ectoblast cells, although con- tinuous in the median line with the mass below, still maintain their columnar shape over the whole dorsal surface and thus give an impression of the ectoblast extending entirely across ; the ectoblast is in this section fused into the median mass without retaining the slightest trace of the columnar arrange- ment, and the median mass of cells thus expose their surface to the exterior for a short space in the axial line (yk. p.). We wish to emphasise the fact that this part directly behind the blastopore is neither at this nor at any subsequent time until considerably later (if ever at all), covered by the ectoblast of the general surface of the body. This area we consider to be the remnant of the yolk-plug of Rusconi found in the Amphibian embryos. This will become clear in the later stages. rom the axial mass, where the layers are indis- tinguishable, there extends toward each side a thick meso- blastic wing under the ectoblast. The yolk seems to be dis- tinct from the mass above, although, throughout this region, protoplasmic threads seem to connect the two. Fig. 10 passes just in front of the dorsal lip of the blastopore where the ectoblast reflects downward and forward to become continuous with the axial strip of the entoblast or chorda- entoblast (compare fig. 16). The blastoporic passage (dl. p.) seen as a transverse space is still open on the left to the exterior. The floor of the passage is formed by a mass of cells continuous with the yolk-plug ; in fact we may consider this a part of the plug. At a lower level the mesoblast (mes.) stretches out laterally as two wings from the median mass. The relations of the yolk are the same as in fig. 9. So far the sections seem to have passed through the part known as the “ sickle.” The next section represented (fig. 11) evidently passes through what may be called the neck or isthmus, i.e. the point from which the three prongs of the trident referred to in the surface view radiate (compare fig. 1 6). Accordingly, the entoblast is found only in the median line as a thickening con- stituting the walls of the blastoporic passage (6/. p.), which is 22 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. now irregularly circular in section. The roof and the sides of the passage are formed by a columnar epithelium two or three cells thick (enc.). This is continuous with the ectoblast at the dorsal lip of the blastopore (compare figs. 16 and 10). It is the chorda-entoblast of Hertwig (No. 6). The floor of the passage and the lower part in general is made up of irregularly scattered cells. This is not only the continuation of the yolk- plug but also of the yolk itself, which occupied the lowest stratum in figs. 7—10. and which has been in the last two or three sections gradually merging itself into the floor of the blastoporic passage. Thus, although it does not appear in any single transverse section, the three germinal layers are fused in the region behind the blastopore. Laterally the entoblast is very thin and passes gradually into the yolk. The section is out of the region of the “ sickle,”’ and there is no longer a mesoblastic wing on each side. Fig. 12 passes through the posterior part of the lower open- ing of the blastoporic passage. The thickenings which form the lateral walls of the opening are therefore still quite thick (compare fig. 1 4). The columnar chorda-entoblast is found as before forming the roof and the sides of the passage, which is now open below. Towards the lower part of the side walls the columnar arrangement is lost and the cells are irregularly scattered. Further out at the sides the cells form a loose network, and then at the edge of the embryonic shield passes into the yolk. Fig. 13 passes through the anterior part of the ventral open- ing of the blastoporic passage, which has now flattened itself out into a shallow groove in the median line. Its roof is still formed by the distinctly columnar chorda-entoblast. Later- ally, the chorda-entoblast gradually passes into a mass of cells arranged in an irregular loose network, which in its turn is replaced by the yolk at the edge of the embryonic shield. Passing forward, the chorda-entoblast begins gradually to con- fine itself more and more to the ventral median surface, until in the seventh section from fig. 13 it has the appearance, presented in fig. 14. Here the columnar shape is confined to a few cells FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONTA. 23 in the ventral median line. They pass above gradually into the loose network of cells which has now extended itself entirely across. The meshes of the network have also become larger than in the previous sections. It is evidently this loose network that produced the appearance of a honeycomb in fig. 1 0. Fig. 14 passes in front of the ventral opening of the blasto- poric passage, and indicates that the loosely scattered lower layer cells are here arranging themselves into the chorda- entoblast in the ventral median line of this region, i.e. along the front part of the middle prong of the trident apparent in the surface views (figs. 1 @ and 4). Fig. 15 passes near the front end of the embryonic shield. There is no longer any trace of the chorda-entoblast ; the entire entoblast is an irregular stratum of stellate cells not thick enough to form a network. It passes into the yolk at the sides. We may here call attention to the appearances which are seen in some embryos of this stage. Round the edge of the lower opening of the blastoporic passage, especially toward the front, there is a shelf-like extension of the entoblast into the archenteric cavity somewhat like the velum of a hydromedusa. Fig. 14a, Pl. III, represents such an appearance. The section is well in front, so that the shelf-like extension is continuous across and divides a small space above from the main digestive cavity below. In sections posterior to this, the small space opens below. We do not know what the significance of this is, unless we suppose that the embryo is younger than that given in fig. 1, and therefore the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage is not yet entirely clear. Fig. J6 is the median longitudinal section of an embryo taken from the same lot as that represented in fig. 1. The blastoporic passage is very distinct. On its dorsal lip, the ectoblast is reflected forwards and downwards and becomes continuous with the chorda-entoblast which passes in front into a loose network of cells with wide meshes, and finally, into the yolk at the edge of the embryonic shield. At the posterior wall of the blastoporic passage, the three layers, the ectoblast, 24 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. the mesoblast, and the yolk (i.e. the entoblast) are merged into one another; in other words, the ectoblast and the ento- blast are here fused and from the fused place a mass of mesoblast cells extends posteriorly. The three layers are inde- pendent a short distance behind the blastopore. As the cross- sections of this region (figs. 8, 9, and 10) show that the mesoblastic mass is similarly extending to each side, we may conclude that, in addition to the primitive streak (fig. 8), the mesoblast is being given off from the posterior wall of the blastoporic passage, or at least from its upper part in all posterior directions for an arc of 180°, somewhat in the shape of an open fan; and this posterior unpaired mesoblastic mass causes the swelling known as the “sickle.” Examining the ectoblast of the posterior part more in detail, we find it gradually losing its columnar character as we approach the blastopore from behind, but the space where the fused median mass of cells is dorsally exposed to the exterior, viz. the yolk- plug (compare fig. 9) is not as conspicuous in the longitudinal section as in the later stages. The entoblastic part of this fused mass extends quite forward. This corresponds to the cells seen in the floor of the blastoporic passage in fig. 11. A slight projection from its extreme tip is, we imagine, the remnant of the shelf-like structure mentioned in reference to fig. 14 a. The principal facts brought out by the study of this stage may be summed up as follows : J. There is a passage which, beginning with the blastopore on the posterior part of the dorsal surface, takes a forward aud downward course to the ventral surface, opening in about the middle part of the latter by a circular opening. 2. At the dorsal lip of the blastopore the ectoblast is re flected and becomes continuous with the chorda-entoblast. 3. In front of the blastopore there are as yet only two primary layers, the ectoblast and the entoblast. 4. The entoblast is having its axial part arranged into a columnar epithelium to form the chorda-entoblast. This process proceeds from behind forward. FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN OHELONIA. 25 5. At the posterior wall (i.e. floor) of the blastoporic pas- sage the ectoblast and the entoblast are fused, and from the point of fusion the mesoblast is being given off posteriorly in all directions for the space of 180°. 6. Also, behind the place where the two primary layers are thus fused, the ectoblast is giving off cells to the mesoblast along the median line (fig. 8). This is the line of the primi- tive streak. It is very short and is present in only two or three sections. 7. The mesoblastic mass derived from the two sources men- tioned in (5) and (6) is unpaired and constitutes the transverse swelling in the posterior part of the embryonic shield, “the sickle.” This is the only place where the mesoblast is present at this stage. 8. The median mass formed by the fusion of the three layers at the posterior wall of the blastoporic passage appears for a short space on the dorsal surface (fig. 9)—the remnant of the yolk-plug of Rusconi. Formation of the Mesoblast and of the Chorda Dorsalis. In the previous stage, the mesoblast was found only in the region behind the blastoporee We may now proceed to describe its formation in front of the blastopore. We call atten- tion first to the embryo represented in figs. 2 a and b. It was taken out exactly forty-eight hours after the deposition, but as the weather was unusually cold for the season during the interval, it has made very little progress in development, and is not as far advanced as many thirty-six hours old. As before, a dorsal and a ventral view of the embryonic shield is given, although these are not taken in this case from the same embryo. The shape of the shield has not changed materially from the previous stage. In the dorsal view (fig. 2a) the blastopore has assumed a horseshoe shape, and is more of a slit than before. Occupying the concavity of the horseshoe is the rudimentary yolk-plug. Round the blastopore, and 26 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. along the median line in front of it, there is an opacity. This seems to be due simply to the fact that the cell layers are thicker in this region than elsewhere. In the middle of this opacity in front of the blastopore and apparently starting from the latter there is a shallow median groove, which probably corresponds to the “ Primitivrinne” or “ Rickenrinne” described by Hertwig in the Triton embryo (No. 6). On the ventral side (fig. 24), we wish to call especial attention to the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage (v.0.). In the previous stage, it was acircular opening without definite limits. In this stage it has acquired well-defined limits on all sides ex- cept towards the front, where it is only faintly bounded. Along the median line of the roof of the recess thus formed, a wide low ridge is visible and is continued in some specimens in front of this area. This is undoubtedly the chorda-entoblast. In the ventral view, the posterior part is concealed by a mass of yolk which has accumulated here in the process of removing the shield from the egy. As we are going to describe somewhat in detail the next stage, we may omit the description of the sections of this, except one through the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage. Fig. 17 is such a section. It passes through the front part of the lower opening. There is in the median line a slight notch in the ectoblast which corresponds to the groove seen in the surface view. In the entcblast we see the axial chorda-entoblast formed as usual of columnar cells. Late- rally, it passes on each side into a mass of polygonal cells— the darm-entoblast of Hertwig (No. 6)—which becomes in its turn continuous with the yolk at the edge of the em- bryonic shield. At the point where the chorda-entoblast and the darm-entoblast meet each other, the darm-entoblast projects as a ridge into the digestive cavity and thus con- stitutes one of the lateral edges which bound the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage (compare fig. 2 4). Con- forming to the groove in the ectoblast, the chorda-entoblast projects downwards in the median line. This corresponds no doubt to the ridge seen in the surface view within the lower FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 27. opening of the blastoporic passage. This section also shows that the roof of the well-defined area which forms the lower opening of the blastoporic passage is formed by the chorda- entoblast and that the latter thus occupies by itself a special recess of the digestive cavity. From just where the chorda-entoblast and the darm-entoblast join each other, there goes out laterally on each sidea string of cells (mes.) placed dorsally to the darm-entoblast and ventrally to the ectoblast and distinct from both. This is the commencing mesoblast. The meso- blast is therefore not continuous from the first across the median line. . The surface view of the next stage is represented in fig. 3. The embryonic shield has become pear-shaped, the broader end being the front end. The blastopore is horseshoe shaped, as in figs. 2 a and 4, and occupying its concavity is the yolk- plug. The head-fold has just begun, and is seen as the pos- terior of the two semilunar curves found near the front end of the embryonic shield. The anterior curve is probably the commencing amniotic fold. Between the head-fold and the blastopore there is seen in the median line an opaque streak, which is narrowest in the middle, and becomes broader ante- riorly and posteriorly. This is the chorda, which is nearly completed in the middle, but still unfinished toward each end. The area pellucida is, as before, found only toward the front and the sides. The pear-shape of the embryonic shield seems to have been produced mainly by its posterior part having lengthened. Figs. 18—23 are selected from a series of cross-sections obtained from an embryo of this stage, and are arranged from behind forwards. Fig. 18, the most posterior section represented, goes through the lateral hmbs of the horseshoe-shaped blastopore and the yolk-plug occupying its concavity. The ectoblast, which con- sists of only a single layer of cells at the sides, becomes gra- dually thicker towards the median line, which it does not, however, reach. Ata short distance from the latter, and at 28 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. the lips of the blastopore, the ectoblast turns ventralward, and becomes lost in the mass of cells found in the axial line. It retains, however, its columnar character for some distance downwards. The considerable space between the two lateral lips of the blastopore is filled almost entirely by a plug (y4. p.) of considerable size, which projects upwards from the axial mass of cells as far as the level of the general surface of the embryo. The difference between the ectoblast and this plug is at once unmistakeable and striking. While the cells in the ectoblast are columnar and always arranged perpendicularly to the sur- face, the cells in the plug are polygonal and without any defi- nite arrangement. We shall return to the discussion of this structure directly. As just stated, the ectoblast turns downwards near the median line, and loses itself in the axial mass. All the germinal layers are, in fact, fused here, for the entoblast, although it has some appearances of being differentiated, is not entirely distinct, and the mesoblast also stretches away from this mass on each side. Toward the sides the entoblast is yet undifferentiated ; it con- sists of an abundant protoplasmic network with numerous nuclei, and is full of yolk-spheres and granules. There is no question whatever that laterally the mesoblast receives cells from the entoblast or yolk. Especially along one line (a, figs. 18 and 20) nuclei are heaped in a special mass, from which cells are being given off to the mesoblast. This contribution to the mesoblast from the germinal wall is only in the posterior part, as it is no longer observable in fig. 23, and as the germinal wall itself, even in a more advanced stage, is found only round the posterior part as a horseshoe-shaped ridge (fig. 5). Having gone over the description of the various parts of this section, let us return to the discussion of the plug (yA. p.) which sticks out to the external surface between the lateral lips of the blastopore. When we compare our figure 18 with the frontal section through the yolk-plug of a Triton em- bryo, which Hertwig (No. 6) gives in his fig. 9, Taf. ii, we think nobody will hesitate long before concluding that the plug in our figure is homologous with the yolk-plug of FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 29 Rusconi found in the Amphibian eggs. Allowing for the differences between a holoblastic and a meroblastic egg, the relations in the two figures are almost exactly alike, part for part. If the slits between the plug and the lateral lips of the blastopore extended in our figure a little more into the midst of each mesoblastic mass the resemblance would be compiete ; but even for the Amphibian eggs the slits do not always extend as far as represented in fig. 9, as Hertwig himself mentions (No. 6, p. 14). At any rate, in each case there is an axial mass of cells, (1) into which the ectoblast turns down at the lateral lips of the blastopore, (2) in which the entoblast is not to be distinguished, (3) from which the mesoblastic masses start away toward each side, and (4) which sends a plug upwards between the lips of the blastopore. If we compare the longi- tudinal section of the plug in Trionyx (fig. 24, y/. p.) with the sagittal section of the Amphibian yolk-plug (Hertwig, No. 6, Taf. ii, fig. 4), we see again that the relations of different parts are alike. It is true that the plug in Trionyx is not bounded posteriorly by a groove, and passes directly into the ectoblast of the primitive streak, but when we consider that the plug in Trionyx is only rudimentary this is not to be wondered at, and is of little significance. . We think we are justified, on these grounds, in concluding that we have in the mentioned structure of Trionyx the rem- nant of the yolk-plug, which appears conspicuously in the Amphibian egg. Strahl describes the same structure (compare No. 13, ser. iii, figs. 0, 0.1, 0.2; ser. iv, figs. 0, 0.1; ser. v, figs. 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3; ser. vi, figs. 0, 0.1; ser. vii, fig.0.1, also No. 9, Taf. i, figs. 6, 7, 14, and 15; and No. 10, figs. 2 and 38), but, so far as known to us, has never explained its nature. Kupffer describes the “ Zapfen” occupying the horseshoe- shaped blastopore of Lacerta (No. 5, Taf. i, figs. 2 and 3, 2), but does not state its homology. He mentions that in Coluber Aesculapii the plug is sometimes divided into two parts by a median fissure (No. 5, Taf. iv, fig. 40, f and g). We have also observed a similar appearance in some of the earlier em- bryos of Trionyx, but we are satisfied that there is no true 30 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. median fissure. What appears to be such is the optical ex- pression of the primitive streak, along which the ectoblast is proliferating, and giving cells to the mesoblast below. Even in the earliest embryos with this appearance it is doubtful if it ever extends to the extreme tip of the plug. As far as we are aware, the only author who mentions what seems to be the yolk-plug in an amniotic Vertebrate is Gasser, who observed it in an abnormal fowl embryo (No. 4, Taf. x, figs.4—7). The reason why the yolk-plug in Trionyx is more conspicuous at this stage than earlier stands, we think, in close connection with the fact that the blastopore has become a much better defined horseshoe-shaped slit. We return now from this long digression to the description of the embryo before us. The sections behind fig. 18 show that immediately behind the yolk-plug, which persists distinctly in only one more section after fig. 18, the ectoblast extends over the whole surface as shown by the characteristic columnar cells. For ashort space, however, the ectoblast is proliferating in the median line and is continuous with the mesoblast below. This is seen in only three sections after which the ectoblast becomes independent. The entoblast seems, however, to be connected with the mesoblast for a greater length and to be actively contributing cells to the latter. This is the region where the germinal wall makes a horseshoe-shaped bend round the posterior part of the embryo (fig. 5). Except in this last detail, the relations of the various parts behind the blastopore exactly as in the stage represented in fig. 1. Going forward, fig. 19 passes through the blastoporic passage. As it is directly in front of the dorsal lip of the blastopore, the ectoblast is still continuous for a little space with the chorda- entoblast, which as usual vaults over the passage. The columnar cells extend to the sides also, but on the floor of the passage the cells are polygonal, so that this part which is the continua- tion of the yolk-plug differs in its appearance from the roof and the sides. To this part, too, the darm-entoblast (end.) is attached. From the entire side of the axial mass the meso- blastic sheet goes out on each side. FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. dl Fig. 20 passes slightly in front of the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage. In the median line the chorda-ento- blast (enc.) forms directly the roof of the digestive cavity, without the intervention of the darm-entoblast (end.) which stops at a short distance from the axial line. On the left side of the section, more clearly than on the right, the darm-ento- blast is seen to make a fold at its innermost point where it abuts against the chorda-entoblast and then to turn outside again to be lost in the mesoblast. The mesoblast is therefore partly continuous with the chorda-entoblast and partly with the darm-entoblast. In other words, it starts from the point where the chorda- and the darm-entoblast meet each other. The mesoblast cells in this region show a peculiar arrangement. Those cells next the ectoblast are columnar and look like the continuation of the chorda-entoblast. The cells placed ven- trally to these are polygonal and without any definite arrange- ment. Laterally cells are being added to the mesoblast in the whole region of the germinal wall, but especially at a ; proli- feration seems to take place in the posterior region even from the outer part of the darm-entoblast, as in this section. This is, however, confined to the part which still consists of two or three layers of cells, and never extends to the inner part which has only a single layer of cells, and constitutes the well differentiated darm-entoblast. We pass over for the present figs. 2] and 22, and come to the most anterior section represented (fig. 23). It is in the region of the head-fold as shown by a notch (h.f.) on one side in the ectoblast. The darm-entoblast, which is laterally quite thick and consists of columnar cells, is internally very thin and becomes continuous with the chorda-entoblast near the median line. From the point of junction as well as from the sides of the chorda-entoblast mesoblastic cells are budding off on each side. There is in this section a small mass of mesoblast cells outside of the head-fold which is distinct from the main mass. This isolation has been brought about by the ectoblast folding downward as the head-fold; more posteriorly the lateral mass fuses with the main mass. In this section the germinal wall 32 K. MITSUKURI AND C, ISHIKAWA. is absent, and thus no additions are made laterally to the meso- blast from the entoblast. Returning to the middle region of the body, figs. 21 and 22 serve to show the first steps in the formation of the notochord. The chorda-entoblast which in fig. 20 passed laterally without any interruption into the mesoblast, is in fig. 21 marked off from the mesoblast, at least in the upper part. The cells at the border between the two are turned away from one another ; thus the cells of the chorda are directed inwards and down- wards, while the contiguous cells of the mesoblast are directed outwards and downwards. The mesoblast is still united with the darm-entoblast. As yet, the chorda is only a mass of columnar cells. In fig. 22, five sections in front of fig. 21, the chorda has become rounded in outline and considerably smaller in section. The most dorsal and median cells alone are columnar, and the remaining cells are arranged as if the more lateral cells have folded inwards and downwards from the two sides and met in the median line. The mesoblast is now dis- tinctly separated from both the chorda and the darm-entoblast. The last abuts against the chorda, but seems separate from it. This is as far as the formation of the chorda has advanced in this stage. In front of fig. 22 the chorda becomes wider again, until in the region of the head-fold it is as represented in fig. 23; a similar arrangement is found at the posterior end of the embryo. Fig. 24 is a longitudinal section of another embryo from the same deposit of eggs as the one represented in fig. 3. It passes very nearly in the median line. The blastoporic passage is considerably narrower than in fig. 16. Its angle of inclination to the surface of the ectoblast is now greater, approaching more nearly a right angle; hence it has become also much shorter than before. At the dorsal lip of the blas- topore the ectoblast is reflected and becomes continuous with the chorda-entoblast. Owing to the fact that the chorda is most developed and therefore narrower in the middle region of the embryo than in front or behind, and perhaps also to the fact that the section is slightly oblique, the mesoblast (mes.) FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 35 appears for a short space ( *—c.) in this section. The entoblast, which is very thick in front, especially in the head-fold (h. f. marked by a notch in the ectoblast), becomes suddenly reduced at the point ¢ into a thin ventral layer (end.) which stretches posteriorly as far as the point marked with a +, where it seems to unite with the chorda-entoblast. From the point of junction and also continued forward from the chorda-entoblast, the mesoblast sheet stretches forwards as far as c, above the darm-entoblast (end.) and beneath the ecto- blast. Behind the blastoporic passage there is a large mass of cells projecting downward (the Endwulst). On the dorsal surface, directly behind the passage, columnar cells are absent for a short space. This is the longitudinal section of the yolk- plug. Following it, the ectoblast cells appear, but cannot at first be separated from the large mesoblastic mass, for this is the region of the primitive streak where the ectoblast is giving off cells below. Very soon, however, it becomes an independent sheet. The continuation downwards of the yolk-plug forms the whole posterior wall of the blastoporic passage, and is there- fore seen as its floor in cross-sections. The entoblast is con- tinuous with it at the extreme front of the “ Endwulst,” but becomes a distinct layer on the ventral surface. The meso- blast, utterly indistinguishable from the yolk-plug, stretches away posteriorly. Behind the blastopore the three germinal layers are thus fused. The mesoblast, which is separate from the entoblast on the ventral surface of the ‘‘ Endwulst,” is receiving more posteriorly additions from the yolk or germinal wall. In the next stage which we figure (figs. 4 @ and 4), the head-fold has considerably advanced, and the amnion (am.) covers it already so that it is not visible from the dorsal side. The medullary folds have touched each other. At the poste- rior end the yolk plug is included between the diverging medullary folds. The sections through the head region of this stage show beautifully, and in an unmistakeable and conclusive manner, the mode of the formation of the mesoblast and of the chorda VOL. XXVII, PART 1,—NEW SER. Cc 34 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. dorsalis. Figs. 25—28 are selected to illustrate these points. Fig. 25 is the most anterior section represented. It goes through the posterior part of the head. The amnion is closed over it, but the digestive cavity is still widely open below. The darm-entoblast formed by columnar cells does not reach the chorda-entoblast, but is separated from it by an interval where cells are most actively proliferating and giving rise to the mesoblastic mass. Fig. 29 is a similar section from another embryo of the same stage. Here also the chorda-entoblast, instead of passing directly into the darm-entoblast, is separated from it on each side by a space where cells are actively dividing and giving rise to the meso- blast. This figure shows also more naturally than fig. 25 that the mesoblastic mass consists of spindle-shaped and stellate cells arranged in such a way as to give an impression of having radiated from their origin. Figs. 26—28 show clearly the mode of the formation of the notochord. Fig. 26 is two sections behind fig. 25. The mesoblastic masses have separated from the chorda- and darm- entoblast. The chorda-entoblast is arcuate. The darm-ento- blast abuts against it but is distinctly separate from it. In fig. 27, the third section behind fig. 26, the chorda-entoblast has become a cord-like mass, against the more ventral side of which the darm-entoblast of both sides is applied. This cor- responds to fig. 22 of the previous stage. In fig. 28, the third section behind fig. 27, the darm-entoblast has passed under the notochord from both sides, and united so as to form a continuous sheet across. ‘The formation of the notochord is thus com- pleted. As in the previous stage, the notochord is finished only in the middle region of the embryo. Toward the posterior region, in front of the ventral opening of the blastoporic pas- sage, the chorda is in the process of formation. The mode of formation is exactly as at the front end. Figs. 30—34 from an embryo of nearly the same stage as that represented in figs. 4 a and 4, are introduced to illustrate this process. FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 35 Fig. 30 is the most posterior section given. It is slightly in front of the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage, which is still visible as a groove in the median line. The darm- entoblast (end.), which is distinct laterally, does not reach the chorda-entoblast, but passes into a zone from which the meso- blastic sheet spreads away laterally, and which in its turn becomes continuous with the chorda-entoblast. This corre- sponds to fig. 25 or fig. 29 of the anterior region, or to fig. 20 of the previous stage. In fig. 81 the chorda-entoblast is beginning to be marked off from the mesoblast, which is, however, still united with the darm-entoblast, at least on the left side. This corresponds to fig. 21 of the previous stage. In fig. 32 the mesoblast has become entirely separated from both the chorda- and the darm-entoblast (excepting a little spot on the left). The chorda-entoblast is now a compact mass by itself, against the sides of which the darm-entoblast is applied. This is more clearly shown on the right side than on the left. This corresponds to fig. 26 of the anterior region, and to fig. 22 of the previous stage. In fig. 33 the darm-entoblast has passed some way under the chorda which has almost the appearance of the finished structure. This corresponds to fig. 27. In fig. 34 the darm-entoblast has passed completely under the chorda and forms a continuous sheet across, and the for- mation of the notochord is finished. This corresponds to fig. 28. The formation of the chorda at the anterior region comes to an end much earlier than in the posterior region, where it is continued on until considerably later, and where the growth in length of the embryo seems mainly to take place. It remains now to state the fate of the blastoporic passage. In an embryo taken out two days later than that given in figs. 4 a and 3b, from the same deposit of eggs, in an embryo, therefore, five days old with five or six mesoblastic somites, the passage is no longer dorsally open. The medul- lary canal has completely closed over it and the blastoporic 36 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. passage has been changed to the neurenteric canal. Figs. 35 a—d, will show the relations of the germinal layers round the passage. In a, the most anterior section given, the darm- entoblast, the notochord, the mesoblast, and the medullary canal are all separate. In 6 the chorda has fused above with the walls of the medullary canal, appears for a little space in the median line on the roof of the digestive cavity, and divides the darm-entoblast of the two sides which seem to rest against it. In ¢ the canal opens below into the digestive cavity. The mesoblast is now continuous with the darm-entoblast and the walls of the neurenteric canal at the junction of the two. In d the posterior part of the neurenteric canal has been cut. In the next section (not figured), the cells in the axial region are only more compact than elsewhere, and show that the posterior wall of the canal is reached. Thus from the mass behind the blastoporic passage (i.e. the “‘ Endwulst’’), the posterior wall of the neurenteric canal seems to have been developed in siti. From this mass the mesoblast is extend- ing laterally on each side. It is not possible for us to state exactly how the yolk-plug disappears. A part of it which formed the posterior wall of the blastoporic passage is no doubt changed into the posterior wall of the neurenteric canal. A part placed more dorsally is perhaps changed directly to the ectoblast of the general surface of the embryo. In an embryo six days old, i. e. one day older than that of fig. 35, the neurenteric canal still persists. In an embryo seven days old it is no longer found. We are not in a position to state how its disappearance is brought about. To state briefly the principal facts brought out by our observa- tions on the formation of the mesoblast and of the notochord : In the embryo represented in figs. 1 @ and 4, the mesoblast was found only in the region behind the blastoporic passage, radiating in the shape of an open fan from the posterior wall of the passage, as well as from the ectoblast along the primi- tive steak, and constituting the structure called the “sickle.” In further course of development the mesoblast becomes ex- tended into the region in front of the blastoporic passage. FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN OHELONIA. 37 Here it arises as a paired mass, and its point of origin is invariably at the junction of the chorda-entoblast with the darm-entoblast. In other words, one part of the mesoblast is always continuous with the chorda-entoblast, while the other part passes into the darm-entoblast. Besides this source the mesoblast receives large contributions of cells from the germinal wall, and even from the outermost part of the darm-entoblast contiguous with the germinal wall. The notochord is formed out of the chorda-entoblast. It is completed first in the middle, and then extends both backward and forward. Its mode of formation is the same, both in front and behind. First, at the point of the origin of the mesoblast the connection of the three structures that meet there, viz. the mesoblast, the chorda-, and the darm-entoblast, is loosened. The mesoblast is then found as two separate masses, one on each side of the median line. The darm-entoblast rests with its free edges against the sides of the chorda-entoblast ; it, how- ever, passes gradually under the chorda-entoblast, until finally the darm-entoblast of two sides fuses in the median line, and forms a continuous sheet over the digestive cavity. In the meantime the chorda-entoblast has arranged itself into the finished chorda-dorsalis. The formation of the Blastoporic Passage. There are differences of opinion among previous writers on the subject in regard to the formation of the blastoporic passage in Reptilia. Balfour (No. 2, p. 424-5) says: “ After the segmentation and the formation of the embryonic shield (area pellucida) the blastoderm becomes distinctly divided into epiblast and hypoblast. At the hind end of the shield a some- what triangular primitive streak is formed by the fusion of the epiblast and hypoblast, with a number of cells between them, which are probably derived from the lower rows of the segmentation cells. At the front end of the streak a passage arises, open at both extremities, leading obliquely forwards 38 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. through the epiblast to the space below the hypoblast.” Here Balfour does not say how this passage arises. In his ‘Com- parative Embryology’ (vol. ii, p. 168) he says: “At the front end of the primitive streak an epiblastic involution appears, which soon becomes extended into a passage open at both extremities, leading obliquely forwards through the epiblast to the space below the hypoblast.” Kupffer (No. 5) is of sub- stantially the same view. Weldon (No. 14, p. 136) says: “ At a point (dp.), however, the position of the future blastopore, these layers are replaced by a mass of closely-packed cells (pr.), exhibiting no division into layers, and forming the primitive streak, which may, in some cases at least, extend backwards as far as the commencement of the area opaca. The blastopore commences at the anterior end of this streak as a pit, open above and closed below. ... . The floor of this pit presently breaks up, and the blastopore assumes its normal condition, forming a communication between the archenteron and the exterior, its anterior wall forming a communication between the epiblast and the lower layer cells. From this time a change in the character of the lower layer cells takes place, beginning from the anterior wall of the blastopore, where they pass into the epiblast, and proceeding forwards. Instead of being large, irregular, full of yolk, as in the previous stages, they become columuar, lose their yolk, arrange themselves in a definite layer several cells deep, and take on the characters of normal hypoblast..... This process is evidently an in- vagination comparable to that which takes place in an Elasmo- branch. It especially resembles the process described by Scott and Osborne in the newt.” Strahl gave his views first in an article published in 1882 (No. 8), and again in a later writing (No. 13, p. 55). His views, as expressed in the latter, are briefly as follows :—Before the neurenteric canal is present the germinal disc consists throughout only of ectoblast and entoblast, except in the region of the primitive streak, which is oval or pear-shaped, or nearly triangular in form. In such a disc three processes, which may be independent of one another, now take place. FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 39 1. Under the primitive streak the entoblast is differentiated, so far as it has not done so already. 2. Inthe middle of the primitive streak the canalis neuren- tericus is sunk, at first perpendicularly below and then hori- zoutally forward. 3. In the region of the primitive streak the ectoblast differen- tiates from the mesoblast.” This differs in the regions before and behind the neurenteric canal. In front of the canal the whole mass is differentiated into the ectoblast and the meso- blast (i. e. mesoblast according to his views: we would call it the chorda-entoblast). In the region behind the canal, only the epidermal layer of the ectoblast is differentiated, the differentiation of the remaining cells into the structures for which they are destined: viz. the extreme end of the medullary canal, of the chorda, &c., takes place at a much later date. As we stated before, we did not succeed in obtaining the stages earlier than fig. 1. We will try, however, to reason back from our earliest stages and to deduce what processes have given rise to such a form. Of course, such a priori reasoning is liable to mistakes, and we offer the following remarks merely as suggestions which need verification by future investigations. If the blastoporic passage really commences as an epiblastic invagination, it seems to us that Kupffer is quite right in con- sidering the invaginated sac as the gastrula cavity much reduced in size (No.5, p. 2). But apart from the inherent improba- bility that the bottom of the archenteron should after- ward give way and the archenteron should become counected with some cavity beyond itself, we think we have another sufficient reason in rejecting the view of an epiblastic invagi- nation in this fact that directly behind the passage, when it is established, there is an area which is not covered by the ectoblast, 1. e. the yolk-plug. We think then that what really takes place must be very much as Weldon and Strahl describe it, for these two writers differ after all, when we leave out minor points, only in this, that the former thinks the passage arises at the front end, and the latter at the middle of the primitive streak. Our views, then, on these earliest stages are as follows : 40 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. At the end of the segmentation the blastoderm becomes divided into two primary layers, the ectoblast above consist- ing of columnar cells, and the entoblast below consisting of irregularly shaped cells without any definite arrangement. At the region of the future blastopore and primitive streak, this process of differentiation is somewhat modified from what takes place elsewhere. When the differentiation of the ectoblast has proceeded backward and come to the future dorsal lip of the blastopore, it does not extend further in the median line over the blastodermic surface, but becomes reflected downward and con- tinuous with the axial strip of the lower layer cells which acquire the columnar character from this point forward in the median line of the future embryo, and arranged themselves into the chorda- entobiast. This process has proceeded to the front end of the embryonic shield in the embryo represented in fig. 1. Whether there is any actual invagination of cells from the dorsal lip of the blastopore we cannot tell, but this is of no moment so long as the ectoblast becomes continuous with the axial strip of the entoblast at the dorsal lip, and the arrange- ment of the lower layer cells into the chorda-entoblast pro- ceeds from here towards the front. We can conceive the blas- toporic passage itself arising in this way. As the cells arrange themselves into the chorda-entoblast, these columnar cells separate from the cells directly behind them and thus a fissure or canal is produced just at the same rate as the cells arrange themselves into the chorda-entoblast. The posterior wall of this canal would thus be composed of undifferentiated cells, as it actually is. While the differentiation of the ectoblast thus stops, in the median line, at the dorsal lip of the blastopore, and the above- mentioned changes leading to the formation of the blastoporic passage are going on, we can suppose that the differentiation of the ectoblast is at the same time proceeding actively in the more lateral parts and is extending backwards and meeting in the median line again slightly behind the blastopore (see fig. 6). There would thus be left behind the blastopore a small space not covered by the ectoblast. This is the yolk-plug, which is of course FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA, 4] continuous with the undifferentiated cells forming the’posterior wall of the blastoporic passage. From the ectoblast in the median line behind the yolk-plug, cells begin to proliferate and constitute the primitive streak. This may happen before the blastoporic passage is completed (see Strahl, No. 8, Taf. xiv, fig. 11). Proliferation begins also from the posterior wall of the blastoporic passage. We shall then have a stage exactly like that given in figs. 1 a and 6. When we make a careful study of the latter embryo, some such series of changes as we have sketched out will become an absolute necessity. Our views are in the main like those of Weldon and of Strahl, but we think we have filled in more details. Strahl, it is true, says that the passage begins in the middle of the primi- tive streak. We are inclined to think that in his figs. 8 and 9, Taf. xiv (No. 8), he has stages in which the differentiation of the ectoblast from the entoblast has not proceeded as far as the dorsal lip of the blastopore. In our view, the 2nd and 8rd processes given in his account have the closest relations to each other. Our hypothesis also makes what takes place in Reptilia harmonise well with the development of lower forms, especially of the Amphibia. Discussion of the Results of our Observations. In an article published as early as 1875 Balfour (No. 1, p- 208) states that “ Amphioxus is the Vertebrate whose mode- of development in its earliest stages is the simplest, and the modes of development of other Vertebrates are to be looked upon as modifications of this, due to the presence of food ma- terial in their ova.” In the same article, as well as in several subsequent publications (Nos. 2 and 3), he endeavoured to work out the comparison of the vertebrate development with the idea given in the above quotation for its foundation. Above all, he has insisted that the mesoblast always arises as paired masses, one on each side of the median line, and that these two masses are to be regarded as paired diverticula of the ali- mentary canal. Recently O. Hertwig (No. 6), in connection with the ‘‘ Coelomtheorie”’ of himself and his brother, has worked 42 K. MITSUKURI AND OC. ISHIKAWA. out this idea very completely in Amphibia, and has also shown, from the investigations of other workers, how the same idea could be carried out through other classes of Vertebrata. We need hardly say that our investigations most completely bear out Balfour’s and Hertwig’s view. In fact, the agreement between the development of Amphioxus and Amphibia on one side, and of Reptilia on the other, as shown by our work, is as complete as could be desired, when we make due allowance for the fact that on one side is a holoblastic and on the other a meroblastic egg. Let us examine more in detail. When we compare our fig. 16 with Hertwig’s fig. 4 (Taf. 1, No. 6) of Triton, we are at once struck with the close similarity between the two, allowing for the fact that the latter represents a whole egg, and the former only a small part of it. ‘There is in both a passage connecting the cavity which becomes the future alimentary canal with the exterior. This is, according to Hertwig’s nomenclature, “die enger Theil der Darmhohle (dh.),”’ according to ours “the blastoporic passage.” At the dorsal lip of this passage the ectoblast in both is reflected, and becomes continuous with the chorda-entoblast. In the region in front of the passage the embryo consists of only the ectoblast and entoblast. In both there is the yolk-plug behind the passage, and contiguous with it the two primary layers are fused, and from the fused point there stretches backward an unpaired mesoblastic mass. Hertwig’s fig. 11, Taf. v, and figs. 7 and 10, Taf. vi, of Rana, are essentially alike. Hertwig’s fig. 17 (Taf. iv) is the frontal section through the line a—d of fig. 4, Taf. 11. It passes through the beginning of the unpaired mass of mesoblast. It presents an appearance very similar to our fig. 8 of the corresponding region. The ectoblast is proliferating in the median line, and giving cells to the mesoblast. In our figure the entoblast and mesoblast are separate, but we have shown already that they become continuous further forward. Hence exactly the same relations hold in this region in Triton and Trionyx. Compare also fig. 2, Taf. vi, and fig. 5, Taf. viii, given by Hertwig of the corresponding region in Rana. FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 43 Hertwig’s fig. 9, Taf. 11, is the frontal section through the line c—d of fig. 4, Taf. 11. It is substantially the same as our fig. 9, although there is a closer resemblance between it and our fig. 18, as we have already shown. Unfortunately Hertwig does not give a cross section of the front region of an embryo which has not yet developed the mesoblast; but we are sure it will be essentially like our figs. 13 and 14, although we cannot expect to find the lateral parts composed of a network of cells. Now, as to the origin of the mesoblast, our results agree with Hertwig’s account as completely as could be desired. In the region behind the blastopore he says the mesoblast arises as an unpaired mass in the Amphibia. Such is the case with Trionyx, as shown in our figs. 7, 8,16, and 24. In front of the blastopore the mesoblast arises as paired masses separated from each other in the median line by the chorda-entoblast. For this point compare our figs. 17 and 20, or, best of all, figs. 25 and 29, with Hertwig’s figs. 1 and 2 (Taf. ui) of Triton. In the latter the chorda-entoblast passes into the parietal layer of the mesoblast, while the darm-entoblast is reflected just where it abuts against the chorda-entoblast, and passes into the visceral layer of the mesoblast, thus constituting what amounts to a pair of diverticula from the alimentary canal, one on each side of the chorda, repeating what is seen in Amphioxus. Hertwig has marked the entrance to these rudimentary diverti- cula with a star (*) in his figures. We have also marked in our figures what we consider to be the corresponding spots with the same mark (*). We think that morphologists will not find any difficulty in recognising in Trionyx the relations closely similar to those in Amphibia. In Trionyx the meso- blastic mass becomes continuous on each side with the ento- blast, just at the point where the chorda- and the darm- entoblast meet each other. The cells being much smaller in Trionyx than in Triton, it is not possible to distinguish the parietal from the visceral layer of the mesoblast; but if both the chorda- and the darm-entoblast pass into the mesoblastic mass, the relations found here amount to the same thing as 44 K. MITSUKURI AND OC. ISHIKAWA. found in Triton and in Amphioxus. We think our figs. 25 and 29 ought to convince the most sceptical on this point. It is significant that at one time (fig. 17) the chorda-entoblast occu- pies a recess of the alimentary canal by itself, and from the two sides of this recess the mesoblastic masses stretch out—a relation which recalls vividly the development of Amphioxus. Our fig. 19 may prove a stumbling block to some in the way of comparison with Amphibia. But we think this figure is soon reduced to the general rule. We have already pointed out that the cells forming the floor of the blastoporic passage in this figure are different from those of the roof and the sides. If we consider the chorda-entoblast as extending on each side to the spot marked with the star, and this spot as corresponding with the similarly marked spot in fig. 15, Taf. iv, of Hertwig, which passes through the corresponding part of Triton, the comparison will become easy. ‘The apparent difficulty is brought about by the cells of the floor being many layered in Trionyx. There is another point on which we wish to touch. Although there is no doubt that the mesoblastic masses arise as what morphologically amount to diverticula of the alimentary canal, the development in Trionyx has so far changed from the primi- tive method that the masses no longer form an epithelium as in Amphioxus or Triton or even compact masses throughout, but at places only loose masses of spindle and stellate cells (figs. 25 and 29). This fact will, we think, answer Kolliker’s objection, based upon the shape of cells in the mesoblast, against the epithelial origin of the mesoblast. (We have not access to Kolliker’s original paper but take his views as given in Hertwig’s paper, No. 6,p.105). Kolliker is no doubt correct in supposing that such forms are due to very rapid proliferation. As to the formation of the chorda, it is only necessary to compare our figs. 25—28 with Hertwig’s figs. 3—6 (Taf. i) of Triton, and figs. 8—11 (Taf. viii) of Rana, in order to be convinced of the similarity of the process in Reptilia and Amphibia. Our figs. 25 and 29 correspond with figs. 1 or 2 ia FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONIA. 45 (Taf. iii, Hertwig) of Triton. Our fig. 26 with fig. 4 (Taf. iii) of Triton, our fig. 27 with fig. 5 (Triton), and, finally, our fig. 28 with fig. 6 (Triton). As to the contribution to the mesoblast from the germinal wall, there is of course no equivalent in the holoblastic egg of Amphioxus or Amphibia. It seems to us that phylogenetically this source is not of much significance and is brought about wholly by adaptation. Sarasin’s (No. 15) researches on the Reptilian egg have brought out the fact that new cells are added on from the yolk to the blastoderm by a process very similar to budding. Why could we not suppose that this process goes on until considerably later, and that the addition of cells to the mesoblast from the germinal wall is but the continuation of this process? We should like to add another suggestion. In Trionyx the primitive streak is continuous with the lateral edges of the blastopore, enclosing the yolk-plug (see fig. 6). Have we not here a case where a part of the original blastopore lips has met in the median line and formed the primitive streak, while the rest of the edge of the blastopore has retained its original condition ? We think we have succeeded in showing that the develop- ment of Reptilia harmonises completely with that of Amphibia. Our observations confirm the conclusions which Hertwig formed in regard to the Reptilian development, basing his judgment on the observations of other workers (No. 6, Theil ii), but we hope we have filled in many details not before noticed. We dissent strongly from Strahl, who in two separate publica- tions (Nos. 11 and 13) oppose Hertwig’s views. We think Strahl is singularly unfortunate in the interpretation of his sections. We think it hardly necessary to go over other papers on the germinal layers of Reptilia (Strahl, Nos. 7, 8,9, 10,11, 12,13; Kupffer, No. 5; Weldon, No. 14; Hoffmann, No. 16), and point out the points of similarity and dissimilarity between those workers and ourselves. The reader must refer to the original papers themselves. 46 K. MITSUKURI AND C. ISHIKAWA. We conclude, expressing the hope that our investigations will furnish a necessary intermediate step in establishing firmly the views of Balfour and Hertwig in higher Vertebrates. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 1. F. M. Batrour.—“ A Comparison of the Early Stages in the Develop- ment of Vertebrates,” ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ 1875. 2. F. M. Batrour.—“ On the Early Development of the Lacertilia, together with,” &e., ‘Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci.,’ 1879. 3. F. M. Batrour.—‘ Comparative Embryology,’ vol. ii, 1881. & GassEr.—‘ Der Primitivstreifen bei Vogelembryonen,’ Cassel, 1879. 5. C. Kurrrer.— Die Gastrulation an den meroblastischen Hiern der Wir- belthiere u. die Bedeutung des Primitivstreifs,’ ‘Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol.,’ Anat. Abth., 1882 and 1883. 6. O. Hertwic.—‘ Die Entwicklung des Mittleren Keimblattes der Wirbel- thiere,’ Jena, 1883. Also found in ‘ Jen. Zeit.,’ Bd. xv, p. 287, et seq. and Bd. xvi, p. 247, et seq. Taf. xii—xv of Bd. xv correspond to Taf. i—iv of the separate publication, and Taf. xiv—xviii of Bd. xvi to Taf. v—ix. We refer only to the separate publication. 7. H. Srrant.— Ueber die Entwicklung des Canalis myelo-entericus u. der Allantois der Eidechse,” ‘ Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol.,’ Anat. Abth., 1881. 8. H. Srrant.—* Beitrage zur Entwicklung von Lacerta agilis,” ‘Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol.,”? Anat. Abth., 1882. 9, H. Srraut.— Beitrage zur Entwicklung der Reptilien,” ‘ Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol.,’ Anat. Abth., 1883. 10. H. Strant.— Ueber Canalis neurentericus und Allantois bei Lacerta viridis,” ‘Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol.,? Anat. Abth., 1883. 11. H. Srrant.— Ueber frithe Entwicklungsstadien von Lacerta agilis,” ‘Zool. Anz.,’ No. 142. 12. H. Srrant.— Ueber Entwicklungsvorgange am Vorderende des Embryo von Lacerta agilis,” ‘ Arch. f. Anat. u. Physiol.,’ Anat. Abth., 1884. 13. H. Srrant.— Ueber Wachsthumsvorgange am Embryonen von Lacerta agilis,” Separatabdruck aus den ‘ Abhandlung der Tenckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft,’ Frankfurt, 1884. 14. F. R. Weitpon.—*‘ Note on the Early Development of Lacerta mura- lis,” ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ 1888; also ‘Studies from the Morph. Laboratory in the University of Cambridge,’ vol. ii, pt. 1, 1884. FORMATION OF GERMINAL LAYERS IN CHELONTA. 47 15. C. F. Sarastn.— Reifung u. Furchung der Reptilieneier,” ‘ Arb. aus d. Zool.-Zoot. Inst. Wiirzburg,’ Bd. vi, 1883. 16. C. K. Horrmann.—“ Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Repti- lien,” ‘ Zeit. f. Wiss. Zool.,’ 1884. EXPLANATION OF PLATES II, III, IV, and V, Illustrating Mr. K. Mitsukuri’s Paper on “The Formation of the Germinal Layers in Chelonia.” List of Reference Letters. a.o. Area opaca. a. p. Area pellucida. am. Amnion. a. Line along which nuclei are specially heaped up in the germinal wall. Figs. 18 and 20.—d/. Blastopore. 4/. p. Blastoporic passage. ch. Notochord. ect. Hctoblast. en. Entoblast. exc. Chorda entoblast. exd. Darm entoblast. g. w. Ger- minal wall. 4%.f. Head-fold. mes. Mesoblast. x. Nuclei in the yolk. sl. “Sickle.” v. 0. Ventral opening of the blastoporic passage. yh. Yolk. yk. c. Yolk-corpuscles. yt. p. Yolk-plug. 2. Shelf-like extension into the archenteron. All the figures, excepting Figs. 5, 6, 14a, 16, and 35, have been drawn by C. Ishikawa. Figs. 1—6 and 35 have been re-drawn by M. Indo. Figs. 1—4 have been drawn with Zeiss’s A A, x 2; Figs. 7—17 with Zeiss’s CC, x 2; Figs. 18—34 with Zeiss’s DD, x 2; Fig. 35 with Zeiss’s B B, x 2; Fig. 5 not drawn to scale; Fig. 6 is.a diagram. Fic. 1a.—Dorsal view of the embryonic shield from an egg just deposited. Fic. 14.— Ventral view of the same. Fic. 2@.—Dorsal view of the embryonic shield from an egg laid forty-eight hours. Fic. 26.—Ventral view of another embryonic shield of the same age from the same deposit. Fie. 3.—Dorsal view of the embryonic shield from an egg laid thirty-six hours. Fie. 4a.—Dorsal view of an embryo from an egg laid three days. Fic. 44.—Ventral view of the same. Fic. 5.—Ventral view of an embryo from an egg laid five days. Fig. 6.—Diagram of the embryonic shield. Fries. 7—15.—Series of transverse sections of the embryonic shield given in Figs. 1a and 4, arranged from behind forward. 48 K. MITSUKURI AND OC. ISHIKAWA. Fig. 7. Section of the region where the three germinal layers are free from one another. Fig. 8. Section of the primitive streak. Fig. 9. Section passing directly behind the blastopore. Fig. 10. Section passing just in front of the dorsal lip of the blastopore Fig. 11. Section through the blastoporic passage. Fig. 12. Section passing through the posterior part of the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage. Fig. 13. Section passing through the anterior part of the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage. Figs. 14 and 15. Sections passing in front of the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage. Fig. 14a. Section showing the shelf-like extension into the archenteron. Fig. 16. Median longitudinal section of an embryo closely similar to Fig. la and 6, and from the same deposit. Fic. 17. Section passing through the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage of the embryonic shield, similar to that given in Fig. 2@ and 4, and from the same deposit. Fics. 18—23.—Series of transverse sections of an embryonic shield, closely like that given in Fig. 3, and from the same deposit. Arranged from behind forward. Fig. 18. Section passing through the lateral limbs of the horseshoe shaped blastopore. Fig. 19. Section through the blastoporic passage. Fig. 20. Section passing slightly in front of the ventral opening of the blastoporic passage. Figs. 21 and 22. Sections passing through the middle region of the shield. Fig. 23. Section passing through the region of the head-fold. Fic. 24.—Median longitudinal section of an embryonic shield, closely like Fig. 3, and from the same deposit. Fies. 25—28.—Series of transverse sections through the head region of the embryo represented in Figs. 4a and 4, illustrating the mode of the forma- tion of the notochord. Arranged from before backward. Fic. 29.—Transverse section through the head region of another embryo, closely like Figs. 4 and 4, from the same deposit. Fics. 30—84.—Series of transverse sections from the posterior region of an embryo, very much like that given in Fig. 4a and 4, illustrating the mode of the formation of the notochord in that region. Arranged from behind forward. Fic. 35.—Series of transverse sections from the posterior region of an embryo, with five or six mesoblastic somites, showing the neurenteric canal. Arranged from before backward. REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 49 On the Structure and Development of the Repro- ductive Elements in Myxine glutinosa, L. By J.T. Cunningham, B.A., Fellow of University College, Oxford, and Superintendent of the Scottish Marine Station. With Plates VI and VII. Historical.—The first zoologist who investigated the minute structure of the generative organs and their products in the Myxinoida was Johannes Miiller. Between the years 1835 and 1845 the great Berlin naturalist published a monograph on the ‘Comparative Anatomy of the Myxinoids,’ the parts of which were first read before the Academy of Sciences of Berlin, and subsequently published separately in three folio volumes. The description of the reproductive system occurs in the last volume, published in 1845; the contents of this volume were com- municated to the Academy in 1842. The description is brief, but as far as it goes I have found it in most respects correct. I shall here quote it almost completely. “The sexual organs hang in a long peritoneal fold on the right side of the mesentery. The structure in Bdellostoma and Myxine is exactly the same. The structure in the two sexes is also completely similar, and it is very difficult to dis- tinguish testis and ovary. «The testes consist of a number of round and roundish long grains (kérner), which resemble the eggs; each has an external skin like the egg skin, and a content somewhat similar VOL. XXVII, PART 1,—NEW SER. D 50 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. to the yolk of the egg; the substance within the testicular vesicles consists of granules of various sizes, but all smaller than the yolk granules. Spermatozoa at the time when the Myxine were examined in the fresh condition (August) were not present ; they are apparently only to be observed at the breeding season. The most important difference between the testicular vesicles (hodenbliischen = kérner, mentioned above) and the eggs seems to lie in the fact that in the former the germinal vesicle is wanting. “The eggs are, when small, round; later they become much elongated, and the ripe ones are very large. I have seen them in specimens preserved in spirit as long as 6” (13 mm.). At the time when I examined the Myxine alive the eggs were not large. In all young eggs, besides the yolk granules, is seen the germinal vesicle, which is very distinct; it contains, besides smaller granula, two or three cells with nuclei which form the germinal spot. When the eggs have become elon- gated the germinal! vesicle lies always at one of the thin ends of the eggs. The yolk granules are differently constructed to the granula of the testicular vesicles ; the granula of the latter are much smaller and round; the yolk granules are, on the contrary, ellipsoidal, and quite similar to the yolk granules of the Elasmobranchs, i.e. they have transverse lines on the sur- face which indicate a differentiation of substance and recall the amylon bodies. ‘These lines are present in the fresh con- dition, as in Sharks and Rays.” The following figures are given: Taf. i, fig. 1—The right side of the abdominal cavity of a male Myxine; the testis exposed ; natural size. Taf. u, fig. 3.--Testicular vesicles in the mesorchium of Bdellostoma Forsteri, natural size; the vesicles are here large and distinct, and project from the edge of the mesorchium ; in the former figure the separate vesicles cannot be distin- guished. Taf. ii, fig. 6.—Young round egg of Myxine fresh magni- fied. Taf. ii, fig. 7—Young egg slightly elongated. REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 51 Taf. u, fig. 8.—Yolk granules from ripe egg of Myxine; some are free, but some contained in a spherical capsule. Taf. ii, fig. 5.—Ripe egg from ovary of Bdellostoma Forsteri, natural size ; it is 3°1 cm. in length. The description of Miiller is the only one which has ever been given of the male generative organ of Myxine, and it agrees in the main with the structure of the young testis, which I shall describe in this paper; but Miller did not under- stand completely the more minute structure of the organ, nor recognise the significance of what he saw. At the time when Miiller’s account of the female organ was written only the ovarian egg was known, and his description of it is correct except that part which refers to the structure of the germinal vesicle. He says nothing of the development of the egg or of its relation to the ovary. His figures have the same qualities as his description ; they represent correctly what can be seen by ordinary dissection without minute investigation. The next addition to our knowledge on this subject was made by Dr. Allen Thomson, in 1859. In the article “ Ovum,” in ‘Todd’s Cyclopedia of Anatomy and Physiology,’ that author gives the following very scanty account of the mature ovum of Myxine :—“ I have found that in the Myxine glutinosa the globular yolk is enclosed in a horny capsule of similar consistence and structure (he has been describing the ovum of Elasmobranchs), but of a simple elongated ellipsoidal shape ; and in place of four terminal angular tubes there are a number of trumpet-shaped tubular processes projecting from the middle of the two ends, which probably serve the same purpose as the differently shaped appendages of the ova of the shark and skate.” He gives a figure of the egg which has been copied in most of the recent text-books and works on Ichthyology. It is correct in shape, but it represents in outline the globular ovum contained within the capsule, the former being much smaller than the latter. It is evident, from both description and figure, that Dr. Thomson was under the impression that the capsule of the ovum of Myxine, with its polar processes, 52 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. bore the same relation to the ovum as the egg capsule of ovi- parous Elasmobranchs, and that the two protective structures were homologous. This view has been adopted on Thomson’s authority by recent authors; Balfour, for example (‘ Comp. Emb.’), simply refers to Thomson’s description. I have not been able to ascertain whence Thomson obtained the specimen on which his description is founded. It is evident, as will be seen later, that he only examined the egg externally. In 1862, the Academy of Sciences of Copenhagen offered a prize for an investigation which should solve the problem of the reproduction and development of Myxine. The prize was never awarded, no one having undertaken the work, but in 18638 Pro- fessor J. Steenstrup published, as a guide to any who might attempt the research, an account of a specimen of Myxine which contained ripe eggs. Professor Steenstrup began by remarking that no one seemed to have seen males, and of females only those which had young or slightly developed eggs, and that the very young and undeveloped females were as unknown as the males; that in the literature there seemed to be no record that naturalists had seen individuals of less than 8 or 9 inches long, whilst those large egg-bearing females which had pre- viously been investigated were generally 10 to 13 inches in length. The work of Miller and Allen Thomson had appa- rently not come under Steenstrup’s notice. The rest of Steenstrup’s short paper is in substance as follows : The females of 10 to 15 inches in length have generally been regarded as females with fully developed sexual products, not without some reason. They have had not only a large number of eggs which were larger than the ripe egg of Petro- myzon, but most of them have had in addition from twelve to twenty eggs which were } to ; inch long, and 2 to 2} lines broad, and these eggs, which have been situated in moniliform fashion along the margin of the ovary, have been so loosely embedded in its folds that they easily fell out into the body cavity. On account of the interest attaching to the question I made a point of collecting as far as possible all the specimens of Myxine which I could obtain, for the Zoological Museum, REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 53 and the number was not inconsiderable. In most of the female specimens which came to hand the large eggs were like cucumbers in shape, tapering to both ends, but in a few speci- mens the eggs were much thicker in proportion to their length, and not pointed at the ends; these, like the other kind, were arranged in a long series enclosed in the mesoarium, and easily fell out into the body cavity. Lastly, in September, 1862, a specimen was found amongst a number sent to the museum, in which some of the eggs not only had the same great thickness and ellipsoidal form, but were surrounded externally by a firmer, almost horny shell which at the ends was provided with a number of slightly curved or S-shaped horny threads. Each thread ends in a head with three or four projecting lobes or hooks, and thus has a certain resemblance to a ship’s anchor. The threads remind one of those which project from the eggs of Sharks and Rays, just as the shell itself reminds one of the egg capsule in those forms. The figure here given shows both the appearance of the capsules and also the manner in which they hang in the mesoarium, together with large unripe eggs and a large number of small ones. The eggs provided with threads were entangled by means of these in the edge of the mesoarium, and with one another. Two conclusions may be drawn from this specimen ; one, that the eggs must be destined to be attached by means of their threads to foreign objects or to one another ; and second, that the females hitherto obtained have not been in the last stage of sexual activity. It follows from the last conclusion that the fish’s known mode of life as a devourer of carcasses must be short and temporary even for the females, and is perhaps only needful until the eggs have obtained a certain stage of deve- lopment, when the animals probably pass into another mode of existence. Steenstrup’s account agrees with Thomson’s except in two features: first, that the former does not describe or represent a globular ovum inside the capsule, and second, that he figures one end of the capsule, forming about one fifth of the whole, detached as a kind of operculum. With reference to the 54. J. T. CUNNINGHAM. concluding part of the above account, I have to point out here that Myxine is not nearly so completely parasitic in its habits as has generally been believed. I have found that it lives for the most part concealed in soft mud, and is found in very large numbers on muddy areas of the sea-bottom. There is no direct evidence that it penetrates the bodies of living fish, and although it is often brought to the surface in the bodies of cod and haddocks which have been hooked, it is far more frequently taken on the hooks themselves. It frequently happens, as I have myself witnessed, that when a long line set for haddocks, and baited with mussel or herring, is hauled up near the mouth of the Firth of Forth, as many Myxine as haddocks are hooked, sometimes fifty specimens of the former being taken at one haul. I am in the habit of taking large numbers of Myxine in eel-pots set on muddy ground at a depth of thirty to forty fathoms off the coast of Haddington- shire, and baited with dead herrings, cod, or haddock. Thus, whatever the reason may be why so few perfectly ripe females are taken, it is not because the animals in this condition no longer bore into the bodies of fish; though the fact might be explained by the ripe females ceasing to feed altogether. The accounts of the egg of Myxine given by Dr. Gunther in his “Study of Fishes,” in the ‘ British Museum Catalogue,’ and in his article “ Ichthyology” in the ‘ Encyclopedia Britannica,’ 9th edition, are derived from the paper of Steen- strup above quoted. In Robert Collett’s ‘ Norges Fiske,’ which forms the supple- mentary volume to the ‘ Vidensk. Selsk. Forh.’ of Christiania for 1874, and was itself published in 1875, mention was made of the distribution of Myxine, and the occurrence of its eggs. Of the latter the author says that they have been obtained by Professor Esmarck in the Christiania Fjord, and that they are often taken on soft ground off the coast of Finmark, or found in the stomachs of cod. Thinking that the eggs here referred to were eggs naturally deposited, | wrote to Mr. Collett on the subject, and in a very courteous reply he informed me that all the eggs he had seen, and to which he referred, were destitute REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 55 of the characteristic polar threads; those obtained by Professor Esmarck having been taken from the ovary of the female, and those he himself obtained from Finmark having been given to him by Mr. Buck, of Oxfjord, and also probably coming from immature females. On applying to Mr. Buck himself I was informed by him that he had only obtained the eggs from the ovary of the female. The only specimens of the ripe egg in the hands of natural- ists are those obtained by Professor Steenstrup, as above described, which are now in the Copenhagen Museum, and a single specimen, which is in the Anatomical Museum of Edin- burgh University. By the kindness of Professor Sir William Turner I have had the privilege of examining the latter, but as it is a unique specimen I was not able to cut it so as to examine its structure. The specimen is represented in Plate VI, fig 1, of the natural size. Externally it agrees with the figures of Thomson and Steenstrup, except that it has no indication of any separation of a part of the capsule to form such an operculum as shown in the figure given by the latter author. The length of the ovum is 25 mm., of the threads about 5 mm. ‘The capsule or membrane enclosing the ovum is thicker at the poles than elsewhere, and the thickened portion can be seen to be transparent, as shown in the figure. At each pole of the ovum there is a slight conical projection, to which the polar threads are attached. One of these projections, the upper in the figure, is larger than the other, and it is beneath this larger projection that the protoplasmic disc is situated—a fact which I infer from my study of the unripe eggs. I was allowed to cut off a couple of threads for microscopic examina- tion. One of these is represented in fig, 1,7. The thread is solid, and not tubular ; its structure, as seen under a low power, appears homogeneous, and in my investigation of the develop- ment of the threads I have found no indication that they are tubular in any stage of growth. The statement of Allen Thom- son on this point is therefore erroneous, and doubtless due to his preconceived opinion that the threads were homologous with the processes of the egg capsule in Elasmobranchs, 56 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. The history of the specimen of the ripe ovum in Professor Turner’s museum cannot, unfortunately, now be traced. It is described in the catalogue as “egg of Myxine, enclosed in its horny capsule, with its terminal openings surrounded by pro- cesses.” This entry was made by Dr. Spencer Cobbold, but that gentleman informed me that he received no account from Professor Goodsir of the history of the specimen. The ter- minal openings mentioned do not exist. Though there is a micro- pyle at the protoplasmic pole it is doubtful if this had been seen by Professor Goodsir. Tradition says that the specimen was obtained by Mr. Shirley, formerly assistant in the Anatomical Museum, and was by him dredged up from the sea-bottom. It is certain that it was brought to the museum in the time of Professor John Goodsir, but no record of its origin is now to be discovered. Itis possible that Dr. Allen Thomson’s account was founded on this Edinburgh specimen, as I have not been able to find any indication that mature ova of Myxine ever existed in Glasgow, where Thomson was professor. It is much to be deplored that Dr. Thomson did not give a complete account of the sources of his knowledge of the Myxme ovum. I am inclined to think that the Edinburgh specimen was taken from a mature female, like Steenstrup’s, as I have vainly dredged for the deposited eggs with much perseverance in places where the animals were extremely abundant. The portions of the literature on the subject in Danish and Norwegian were translated for me by my friend Mr. W. E. Hoyle, M.A., of the “ Challenger” Commission Office, and to him, as well as to Professor Turner and the several zoologists who have given most courteous attention to inquiries concern- ing Myxine which I addressed to them, I have much pleasure in expressing here my heartiest thanks. Course of the Research.—Since last June I have made systematic efforts to obtain the ripe generative products of Myxine, and as the animals were obtained with considerable ease in large numbers in the neighbourhood of the Firth of Forth I had some reason to hope for success. I have conveyed a number of living and well-grown specimens to the aquarium of REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 57 the Scottish Marine Station, and some of these have lived there for six months; but they refused to feed, and probably in con- sequence of this their sexual organs have not developed to the mature condition. I was able to observe the normal mode of life of the creatures when at rest and not seeking food. They lie with their bodies entirely buried in soft mud, with the ex- ception of the extreme tip of the snout, and in this condition respiration is carried on by means of a current of water, which enters at the nostril, passes into the pharynx, and after tra- versing the gill-sacs escapes by the two branchial apertures situated immediately in front of the liver. This current is rendered evident by the movement of the particles of mud caused on the escape of the water from the latter openings. I have also obtained a large number of specimens of Myxine from fishermen and by means of my own excursions, and as I failed to obtain ripe eggs or ripe spermatozoa I set myself to try and elucidate the nature and development of the ova and spermatozoa by the minute investigation of the immature organs. Female Organs.—To deal with the ovaries first, careful examination shows that the largest ovarian eggs are situated nearest to the attached border of the mesoarium. The ovary of Myxine agrees in structure and relations with that of other fishes very closely ; its chief peculiarities are two in number. Firstly, it is extremely thin from side to side, the edge where the eggs are produced, forming a border only slightly thicker than the mesoarium with which it is continuous: there is no distinct boundary between ovary and mesoarium. Secondly, the mesoarium is attached, not to the back of the body cavity, but along the line of attachment of the mesentery with the straight intestine. The eggs are produced at the free edge of the ovary, which is covered by a thin epithelium; and the eggs are produced from this germinal epithelium in the same way as in other Vertebrates, and are surrounded after their separa- tion by a follicle consisting of a connective-tissue capsule, and a follicular epithelium. I have not attempted to ascertain whether the cells of the follicular epithelium are derived from 58 Je T. CUNNINGHAM. the germinal epithelium or produced otherwise; the former method is that believed to obtain by the best authorities in all Vertebrates, and I have no evidence against its occurrence in Myxine. As the eggs grow larger by the accumulation of yolk they pass inwards towards the attached border of the mesoarium, the largest and oldest being always the most internal. These large eggs appear when a specimen is first opened to hang from the edge of the ovary, but examination of the organ in liquid shows at once their true relations. ‘The mesoarium is con- tinuous with the connective-tissue sheath of the follicle in the largest ovarian egg, as well as in the small ones, along a line which passes round the longest circumference of the ellipsoid formed by the follicle, and the transition between the two structures is abrupt ; the mesoarium in the immediate neigh- bourhood of its attachment to the follicle is as thin as else- where and is easily torn, so that the larger eggs are easily separated, follicle and all, from the ovary when the animal is roughly handled. The weight of the large egg causes the mesoarium to be stretched, and each egg hangs down beyond the edge of the ovary, seeming at first sight to be enclosed ina bag formed by part of the mesoarium. But the relation of the two is always as I have described above ; and it does not differ from the relation between egg follicle and ovarian stroma in Elasmobranchs and other Vertebrates except in the contrast in thickness between the ovarian egg and the surrounding portion of the ovary. In order to ascertain the structure of the fol- licle and egg membranes I cut series of sections through the polar portions of the largest ovarian eggs I could find. Fig. 2 represents the appearance of one of these sections passing exactly through the pole of the egg. The egg from which the section was taken was 16 mm. in length, and neither by external examination nor from the sections could any trace of the polar threads be discovered. In the section the thickest and most external layer is the connective-tissue capsule (a), composed of very thin interlaced fibrils with numerous small nuclei. This layer is disposed in laminz parallel to the surface of the follicle, and in it are numerous small elongated spaces, some of which REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 59 are blood-vessels. The connective-tissue layer passes off into the thin flat mesoarium (me.). On the surfaces of the latter, as well as on the outer surface of the follicle, there is doubtless a thin flat epithelium, but this is so indistinctly differentiated from the connective tissue that it does not show itself in sections except by its nuclei. Within the connective-tissue layer is the epithelium of the follicle (6). This epithelium is composed of elongated cells disposed with their axes perpendi- cular to the surface of the epithelium. There are several | layers of these cells as shown in the figure, but the layers are not regularly arranged, in some places three, in others four or five nuclei succeeding one another in a radial direction. At the exact pole of the egg there is a differentiated portion of epithelium, where a proliferation of the latter has taken place. This portion is composed of polygonal cells which are little or not at all elongated, and towards the egg it runs out into a thin cylindrical process which penetrates the next layer, as shown at e.p. Thenext layer (c) is thin and membranous. In the living egg it is doubtless in contact with the epithelium, and the separation between the two shown in the figure has been produced by the action of the hardening reagents em- ployed in the preparation of the egg. This layer as shown in the figure appears under a low power single and homogeneous, ‘and it is Im immediate contact with the substance of the ovum proper, or, as it is sometimes called, the vitellus. The polar portion of the vitellus which is in immediate contact with the membrane (c) is granular in structure, stains well, and is proto- plasmic in nature. In this protoplasmic cap is found the germinal vesicle, shown in some of the other figures. Beneath the membrane (c) at other parts of the ovum there is no separate protoplasmic layer, the yolk-discs extending to the inner surface of the membrane. The protoplasmic cap with its germinal vesicle forms thus a germinal disc similar to that found in the bird’s ovum, and other meroblastic vertebrate ova. The rest of the ovum is composed principally of yolk elements, the elliptical vitelline discs show in the figure. The nature of the membrane (c) must here be particularly consi- 60 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. dered ; we can obtain some probable conclusions concerning it by referring to what is known concerning the egg membranes in other Vertebrata. The account which Balfour gives in his ‘Comp. Emb.,’ vol. i, of the egg membranes in Craniata, is as follows. There are three membranes which may all coexist, or one or two only may be present. These are: 1. An outermost homogeneous membrane without striz or fine pores, by most authors regarded as a chorion (i. e. as pro- duced by the follicular epithelium), but by Balfour as a vitelline membrane (i.e. as produced by the ovum itself). 2. A radiately striated membrane, internal to the former when the two coexist, which can be broken up into a series of separate columns. These give to the membrane its radiate striation, but it is probable that there are fine pores between the columns. This membrane is the zona radiata of most authors. It is a differentiation of the outermost layer of the yolk. 3. Within the zona radiata a third and delicate membrane is occasionally found, especially when the ovum is approaching maturity. According to Balfour, the first membrane to be formed in Elasmobranchs is the vitelline membrane, the first of the three above defined ; this appears in some instances before the forma- tion of the follicle, a fact which appears to show that it is really formed as a differentiation of the protoplasm of the egg. In Elasmobranchs this membrane attains a very considerable development. A zona radiata is generally if not always present in Elasmobranchii, but arises later than the vitelline mem- brane. The zona radiata always disappears long before the ovum isripe. The vitelline membrane also gradually atrophies though it lasts much longer than the zona radiata. When the egg is taken up by the oviduct, all trace of both membranes has disappeared. Is there any evidence to show whether the membrane (c) in the Myxine ovum owes its existence to the ovum itself or to the follicular epithelium? The only evidence to which I will point at present is that the follicular epithelium is very much thicker REPRODUCTIVE ELEMENTS IN MYXINE GLUTINOSA. 61 at the poles of the follicle than in the equatorial region, and the membrane in question varies in thickness with the epithe- lium. I shall recur to the question of the nature and origin of the membrane further on. In this paper I shall call the membrane the vitelline membrane, using that term to include the whole of the primary egg membranes produced within the follicle. The term chorion will not be used, as its application in the case of mammals to a membrane which is partly derived from the blastoderm renders it unsuitable in connection with primary egg membranes. The term vitelline membrane, as used in this paper, implies no assertion as to derivation from follicular epithelium on the one hand, or ovum on the other. In Myxine, as will be conclusively shown in the course of what follows, the vitelline membrane forms the sole protective covering of the deposited ovum. It is now necessary to trace the destiny and elucidate the significance of the process from the follicular epithelium above described. In the sections succeeding the one shown in fig. 2 this cylindrical process is seen to penetrate the vitelline mem- brane, occupying a tubular cavity in the latter, and passing through it to form a hemispherical projection on its inner sur- face. This tubular aperture in the vitelline membrane, with its contained epithelial cells, is shown in fig. 3, as seen under a high power. The section lies almost in the plane of the canal, and so exposes nearly the whole of its cellular contents, in- cluding the hemispherical projection surrounded by the proto- plasm of the germinal disc. ‘This cellular projection is covered by a thin membrane continuous with the vitelline membrane, and is not in immediate contact with the germinal disc. In fig. 3 the outer end of the canal, that towards the follicular epithelium, is closed, owing to the direction of the plane of the section, but in previous sections, as stated above, the cellular cylinder filling up the canal is seen to be continuous with the process projecting from the surface of the follicular epithelium. The structures now described, as I have convinced myself by a series of sections from more than one egg, exist only at one pole of the ovarian ovum, There is thus at one pole of the 62 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. nearly ripe ovum a tubular canal extending through the chorion, but not open internally, filled up by a cylinder of cells project- ing from the follicular epithelium. It is evident, on considera- tion of the above facts, that this aperture is to form the micro- pyle in the ripe ovum, and we have here, as will be explained more fully below, the explanation of the process of fertilisation in the ovum of Myxine. It is very improbable that sperma- tozoa could penetrate such a thick dense capsule as is formed by the vitellime membrane in the ripe ovum, and thus the presence of a micropyle is necessary. Another point of some interest in this connection is that we have here for the first time the complete history of the origin and formation of the micropyle in a vertebrate ovum. A micropyle is known to exist in many Teleostean ova, but little investigation has been made as to how the structure is produced in the course of the ovarian development of the ovum. In a paper which has recently come into my hands (‘‘ Studien uber das Hi,” ‘Mémoires del’Acad. Imp. St. Peters.,’ 1885), Ph. Owsjannikow describes some observations on the micropyle in the ovum of Osmerus eperlanus, the comparison of which with my description and figures is very interesting. The eggs studied by Owsjannikow were not naturally shed, but taken when almost ripe from the ovary. In this condition the layer of follicular epithelium, or granulosa, as the Russian investi- gator calls it, is frequently found attached to the egg mem- brane. The egg membrane consists of two layers, called zona radiata externa and zona radiata interna. A micropyle pierces both of these layers, and is expanded like a funnel externally. A conical projection from the granulosa was seen to extend into the micropyle. This conical projection was not solid as in the case of Myxine, but hollow, forming a lining to the micropyle. A thin thread was seen to extend from the end of the funnel-shaped opening in the external zona, through the internal micropyle, which was a narrow canal in the internal zona. ox al’ male iw Cae baie iy fa) ewlinad IAC igeel Ba aA AE vob OD ai iarta we Vir Alahedth: al): red por nite (Gb tie @ \ ae ipiiat ai caver alt ror cw ait bate ea AV 9 Ape el ae a ee ‘yen nets a, Gal Pe rE ia etbAd dias les (icine) Calireced Anaset RRs Wadi Vos anhiid bv deeb Ue neacilotie Glo lw Wr aS een! mT wT ; livid Sits yw goiter til errand dain ig rT ee si yal Mh wok vst Due outs ~ eeiintw Ais im nminw wei) Pb PPLuryy RS sae A a ; uh mealaiiD ‘ ify seiie Mpa -f.9B) Mir i Rey | * i ‘ = ‘ pan ies Te eine 5 7 F is ries) tie acl i - . we 1 ’ a sbibe LSet od ’ ot Us AL Sh aie . “e i efi 5 y yyehe } 7 mr ng ; ay havin ~ nis § ae Gh eens ‘uot pb ete \ di. | 2) Je iy ae. fl alae i: : rae \ ea TN r, iv ile ‘ iad PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 165 On the Presence and Structure of the Pineal Eye in Lacertilia. By W. Baldwin Spencer, B.A., Fellow of Lincoln College, Assistant to the Linacre Professor of Human and Comparative Anatomy in the University of Oxford. With Plates XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX and XX. Tue following work has been carried on in the morphological laboratory of the University of Oxford. It has been made possible solely through the kindness of Professor Moseley, whose invaluable assistance in various ways, especially in procuring from different sources the necessary specimens, I here desire to acknowledge with sincere thanks. Historical Account.—Though it was impossible for the external indication of the important organ which forms the subject of the following pages to escape the notice of naturalists and more especially of those dealing with the classification of the group, consisting as it does in the modification of a median scale upon the dorsal surface of the head, yet it is strange that only within a very recent period has there been any thorough investigation of the structures lying beneath. This is perhaps chiefly to be accounted for by the fact that the structure in question lies usually within the parietal foramen, enclosed tightly by bone and connective tissue, and is thus left intact within the skull on removal either of the skin from the external or the brain from the internal surface. Brandt,’ writing in 1829, uses the following words when describing the skull of Lacerta agilis. ‘ Hinterhaupts- 1 © Medizinisch Zoologie,’ 1829, Bd. i, p. 160. 166 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. schilder 4; selten nur 3; die beiden mittelsten hintereinander stehenden, die kleinsten, das obere, grdssere regelmassig 5-eckig, meist mitten, mit einer runden, vertieften stelle,” and he adds in a foot-note, “ Eine eigne Driisenstelle bezeichnend.” The external marking on the surface of the head is not repre- sented in the drawing of L. agilis (fig. a, Tf. xix), but his description shows that he recognised the presence of an internal modification corresponding to the specialised scale. Milne Edwards! and Dugés? both figure the external modi- fication in certain lizards, but neither, strangely, make the slightest mention of it in their descriptions of the animals. Leydig,® writing more than forty years later, is apparently the first to point out with any clearness the presence of the organ, and to give some account of its structure and of the development of the epiphysis, though he entirely failed to dis- cover the relationship existing between the two. Under a high power, he says, the body in question which lies ‘‘ above the thalamencephalon or the region of the third ventricle,” is seen to consist of long cells similar to those of a cylindrical epithelium, so arranged that they form altogether a shallow pit with a circular outline; the rim of the pit is turned upward, and has a thick black girdle of pigment; “ welcher schon fiir das freie Auge das Organ sehr bemerklich macht.” After stating that it has a special blood supply, he goes on to say: “ Das Organ ist keineswegs, woran Man zuniichst denken konnte, die embryonale Zirbel, dem diese folgt erst darunter und ist von ganz anderer Beschaffenheit.”’ “ Fragliches Gebilde entspricht ferner der Stelle, wo sich am skeletirten Schadel des fertigen Thieres im spateren scheitel- beine, das oben schon erwahnte kreis runde Loch befindet.” He examined the organ in Lacerta agilis, L. muralis, L. vivipara, and Anguis fragilis. On pl. xii (fig. 159) he 1 « Recherches Zoologiques pour servir a Vhistoire des Lézards,” ‘ An. Sci. Nat.,? 1829, tom. xvi, p. 50. 2 « Mémoire sur les especes indigenes du genre Lacerta,” ‘ An. Sci. Nat.,’ 1829, tom. xvi, p. 337. 3 «Die Arten der Saurier,’ 1872, p. 72, Taf. 12. PINEAL EYE IN LAOCERTILIA. 167 draws asection at right angles to the long axis of the head in L. agilis, passing through the organ in question, which he calls the “ Stirn Organ,” and the pineal gland. Speaking of this section he says: “ Man gewinnt dadurch die Ueberzeugung das es sich um eine innerhalb der Epidermis besonders abgegrenzte Partie handelt ; und zwar einer solchen, welche von kugeligen Umriss und zelliger Zusammensetzung tber der Oeffnung im Scheitelbein ruht. Unmittelbar unter dem Knochen in der gleichen senkrechten Linie steht die Zirbeldriise. Sollen etwa die Lagen des Schnittes genauer aufgezahlt werden, so folgt von aussen nach innen zuerst die Hornschicht der Epidermis ; dan die Schleimschicht und das kugelige zellige, Organ in ihr ; darauf die nicht ossificirte, stark schwarz pigmentirte Theil der Lederhaut ; alsdann der Knochen mit seinen Markratimen, welche gegen die Oberflache gedffnet sind. Unterhalb des Knochens kommt die wieder stark gefarbte harte Hirnhaut, und unter dieser, ihr angeheftet die Zirbel; sie verbindet sich. durch zwei nervése‘Schenkel mit dem Gehirn.” He describes also the presence of the organ in Anguis frygeélis; it is present as a small dark spot on the thalamen- cephalon of very young embryos (cf. Tf. xii, fig. 160), whilst in somewhat older embryos (fig. 162), in addition to the spot, a dark streak is present lying above the unpigmented part, which he recognises as the true pineal gland as well as “ ein kleiner unpigmentirter Korper, wie ein winziger Higel bemerk- bar ” (fig. 163, c). These three parts are distinct from the epiphysis itself, and can be seen on removal of the skin from the head. Further, it is evident that the black spot and the black streak are of a similar structure, the walls of each are composed of long cylindrical cells so arranged in the streak as to bound a clear space (see fig. 163), whilst at the black spot they enclose a pit “die vielleicht als Ausgang jener Lichtung zu deuten ist.’ . The cells of both structures have pigment at their inner ends bounding the cavities, the pigment in those of the “spot” being much deeper than in those of the “streak.” With regard to the epiphysis, he says: “ Die Zirbel deren Stiel aus 168 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. zwei Schenkeln besteht, liegt unterhalb des ‘ Punctes’ und ‘Streifens,’ und zeigt sich als etwas von beiden wohl verschie- denes. Ihre Oberflache hat das schon gedachte, faltige Aus- sehen, das ich auf eine Zusammensetzung aus gewundenen Schlatichen bezog. Doch erhielt ich auch den Eindruck, als ob es sich um eine blasige Bildung mit Faltung der Oberflache handle. Die Zirbel ist vollig unpigmentirt.” As to the nature and function of the structure, he says: ‘“‘ Wie das Organ zu deuten sie, wird im Augenblick wohl Niemand zu sagen sich im Stande fiihlen. Doch kann ich nicht umhin, einstweilen an die ‘ Stirndriise’ der Batrachier zu denken und etwas dieser Bildung verwandter zu vermuthen.” In 1882 Rabl Riickhard,! dealing with the development of the epiphysis in the Trout, stated that the pineal gland appears early in the median line on the dorsal surface of the brain, between the first and second brain vesicles, as an outgrowth which admits of close comparison with that of the primary optic vesicles. This resemblance led him to the idea of the pos- sibility, supposing certain secondary developments of epiblast (to form a lens) and of mesoblast took place, that the pineal gland might become transformed into an eye just as are the optic vesicles. This result—the formation of an eye more or less closely similar to the paired eyes—is of course precisely that which does not obtain in Lacertilia, where no such secon- dary development from epiblast and mesoblast takes place. He says: “ Allein wahrend diese unter Mitmirkung des sich zur Linse einstiilpenden Ectoderms und des Mesoderms com- plicirte Veranderungen eingehen, die schliesslich zur Ent- wickelung des héchst entwickelten Sinnesorganes, des Auges, fiihren, sehen wir an der Zirbeldriise trotz der giinstigen Lage ihres distalen Endes dicht unter dem Ectoderm nichts der- gleichen. Mann denke sich eme ahnliche Wucherung und ihre Folgen, wie an dem die Augenblasen bedeckenden Kcto- derm, das Auftreten von Pigment im sich betheiligenden Mesoderm und nichts steht der Vorstellung im Wege, dass 1 “Zur Deutung und Entwickelung des Gehirns der Knockenfische,” ‘ Arch, f, Nat, und Phys.,’ 1882, p. 111, + PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 169 sich aus der Zirbel ein den Augen ahnliches unpaares Sinnes- organ entwickelt. Interessant ist, dass diese Gegend in einen bestimmten embryonstadium bei Reptilien (Lacerta, Anguis) eine ahnliche Entwickelung wenigstens andeutungsweise zeigt und dass hier am Scheitelbeine des fertigen Thieres sich ein kreisrundes Loch befindet.” In a subsequent paper, which I have not had the opportunity of seeing, but a quotation from which is given by the author ina recent note to the ‘Zoologischer Aunzeiger,”! he apparently makes a further suggestion with regard to the pineal gland, and says “ Das Schadeldach der riesigen fossilen enaliosaurier des Lias des Ichthyosaurus und Plesiosaurus besitzt ein unpaares Loch, welches seiner Lage nach mit dem Loch in Scheitelbein der Saurier tibereinzustimmen scheint. Vielleicht lag auch hier das viel entwickeltere Zirbelorgan mit seinem distalen Endtheil zu Tage, und man konnte sich vorstellen, das seine Leistung nicht sowohl die eines Sehorgans als die eines Organs des Warmesinnes war, dazu bestimmt, seine Trager vor der zu ntensiven LEinwirkung der tropischen Sonnenstrahlen zu warnen, wenn sie in trager Ruh, nach Art ihrer noch lebenden Vettern der Crocodile, sich am Strande und auf den Sand- binken der Liassee sonnten.” Ahlborn? has described carefully the structure of the epi- physis in Petromyzon, giving a series of drawings to illustrate the histology of the part and its attachment to the brain. He follows Scott in saying that it arises as a glove-finger- shaped outgrowth on the hinder part of the roof of the thala- mencephalon in front of the posterior commissure and behind the ganglion habenule. In the adult, according to Ahlborn, the basal proximal part is reduced to a mere rudiment, whilst the most distal portion of the pineal gland has acquired a secondary fusion with the 1 ‘Zool. Anzeig.,’ 21st June, 1886, “ Zur Deutung der Zirbeldrise.” The paper referred to here was, of course, published subsequently to Ahlborn’s paper, “ Ueber die Bedeutung der Zirbeldrise,” published in 1884. 2 «Untersuchungen tiber das Gehirn der Petromyzon,”’ ‘ Zeit. f. Wiss,,’ 1883, p. 230, Tf. 13 and 16, 170 W. BALDWIN SPENOER. terminal division of the left ganglion habenule, whereby is simulated the existence of a primitive genetic connection of the epiphysis with the anterior roof of the thalamencephalon. In the epiphysis Ahlborn states that three parts can be dis- tinguished clearly separated off from each other. (1) A hinder thread-like stalk. (2) Two anterior vesicles lying upon one another (Taf. xiii, fig. 2, and Taf. xvi, figs. 43, 44, 46, and 47). The latter form, the “ Weisse kuchenartige Masse,”’ which Wiedersheim recog- nised as the primitive pineal gland, and lie above the point of the beak-shaped roof of the thalamencephalon. The thread- like stalk is attached to the upper vesicle, and corresponds to the proximal and median part of the epiphysis of Selachians and Amphibians (and we may now add to the stalk connecting the “eye” with the dorsal surface of the thalamencephalon of Lacertilia). The distal portion of the epiphysis consists of two vesicles, of which the upper is the larger ; their cavities, save in rare cases, do not communicate with each other. Ahlborn describes the upper vesicle as being a delicate hollow structure, flattened out dorso-ventrally, and placed close to the skeletogenous roof of the cranial cavity. The cells of the lower wall are always much thicker and deeper than those of the upper, and in his figures (Taf. xvi, figs. 44, 46, and 47), though he does not describe them minutely, are seen to have their long rod-like ends free from nuclei, and turned towards the cavity, whilst the nuclei are all placed close to their external extremities. These rod-like structures, however, are quite devoid of pigment, and, moreover, have a thin but well-marked layer of nervous matter present between them and the cavity of the vesicle, which is itself apparently occupied by strands of nervous tissue passing from the posterior to the thin anterior wall. There is nothing comparable to a lens. The under vesicle is attached on its ventral surface to the left ganglion habenule (the whole organ is placed asymmetri- cally, and lies on the left side), whilst its upper wall is fused with the larger upper vesicle. This secondary fusion with PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 171 the brain roof necessitating the closure of the epiphysis within the cranial cavity. Ahlborn!? has also, in a separate article, discussed the nature of the pineal gland. He does not agree with Van Wijhe, who, following Goette’s work on Amphibia, had regarded the pineal gland as “ Ein Umbildungsprodukt einer letzten Verbindungs des Hirns mit der Oberhaut” (a mistake corrected later by Van Wijhe (see infra). He agrees, on the other hand, with Balfour,? who stated that the epiphysis arose as an outgrowth from the dorsal surface of the thalamencephalon, and says, himself: ‘ Das Neuralrohr is relativ lange vor dem Auftreten der ersten epiphysenanlage vollstandig geschlossen, der Porus ist nicht mehr vorhanden.” He states, further, that the cavity of the primitive pineal gland is a new structure formed as an outgrowth of the neural canal, and “ ist also nicht ein Rest der vorderen Verschlusséffnung des Gehirns ;” hence it cannot be compared with the anterior neuropore of Ascidians and Am- phioxus ; but he says: “‘ Durch den Vergleich der Epiphysis cerebri mit einer primitiven Augenblase glaube ich nun eine Reihe sehr gewichtiger Griinde fiir eine neue und wie es scheint richtige Deutung der Zirbeldriise gefunden zu haben.” He then draws attention to the fact that both the pineal gland and the optic vesicles agree in origin as hollow outgrowths, the only difference between the two being that the optic vesicles are large and laterally placed, whilst the pineal vesicle is small, dorsal, and median. After giving in detail other reasons, he says, Alles zusammengenommen komme ich nun aus folgenden griinden : (1) Nach mit dem Augenblasen tibereinstimmenden Ent- stehung der Epiphysis durch eine hohle Austilpung der Hirnwand ; (2) nach dem Ursprung und der Verkntipfung der Epiphysis mit der optischen Hirnregion, speciell mit dem Thalamus opticus ; 1 “ Ueber die Bedeutung der Zirbeldriise,” ‘ Zeit. f. Wiss.,’ 1884, Bd. xl, p. 331. 2 «Klasm. Fishes,’ p. 177. VOL. XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER. N 172 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. (3) nach der morphologischen Aehnlichkeit des Organs mit einer primitiven Augenblase (Blischen und Stiel) ; (4) nach der angenahert peripherischen Lage des Blaschens bei den Selachiern, Ganoiden und Petromyzonten und nach einer volkommen peripherischen Lage bei den Amphibien (ausserhalb des Schidels auf gleicher hohe mit den Augen ; (5) nach dem ursprunglichen zusammenhang der Epiphysis mit der Nervenleiste (van Wijhe); zu der Vermuthung, das die glandula pinealis als das Rudiment einer un- paaren Augenanlage anzusehen ist. Wenn dieser Schluss richtig ist, so besitzt die Epiphysis als Rudimentares Stirnauge, wie mir scheint, noch jetzt ein funktionirendes Analogon in dem unpaaren Auge der Tunicaten und vielleicht auch des Amphioxus.” Van Wijhe, dealing with the development of Selachians, stated first that the anterior neuropore (the spot at which the brain remained last in connection with the epidermis during closure of the neural canal) corresponded to the pineal gland as was stated by Goette to hold true for Amphibia. In his more recent paper,’ wherein he describes the results arrived at by working with duck embryos, he corrects his first mistake, and states that in birds, though the neuropore exists till the stage with twenty-eight somites, it then completely disappears, whilst when twenty-nine somites are present, the earliest rudiment of the epiphysis appears. Hoffmann? states that in representatives of nearly all classes of Vertebrates it has been proved that the epiphysis arises as an evagination of the roof of the thalamencephalon, and figures its earliest stages in various reptilian embryos (Tropidona- tus natrix and Lacerta); showing also that it is perfectly distinct from, though present at the same time as, the anterior neuropore. The latter, he says, indicates the position where the “ Vorderhirn ” joins the “ Zwichenhirn”’ whilst the epiphysial 1 “Ueber den vorderen Neuroporus und die phylogenetische Function des Canalis Neurentericus der Wirbelthiere,” ‘ Zool. Anzeig.,’ 1884, p. 683. 2 « Weitere Untersuchungen zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Reptilien,’ ‘Morph. Jahr.,’ Bd. xi, 1885, p. 192, PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 173 rudiment is situated where the “ Zwichenhirn” and the “ Mittel- hirn” unite. He states further: ‘‘ Die vordere Ausbruch- tung der Epiphysis schnirt sich volstandinge von den Hirndach ab; sie bildet eine kleine, runde, selbstandige Blase von platt- gedruckter Form und stellt die Anlage des sogenannten Ley- digschen Organes/von Strahl hat dieses zuerst erkannt und ich kann seinen Befund bestatigen.” The most recent, as well as most interesting work upon the pineal gland is that of de Graaf,’ to whom is certainly due the merit of having first clearly shown that in one particular animal (Anguis fragilis) the pineal gland actually is modified into a structure comparable to an Inverte- brate eye. He says: “Dem zufolge gleicht bei Anguis fragilis das ganze abgeschnirte Stiick etwa dem Auge eines hoher entwickelten wirbellosen Thieres, wie uns z. B. Cephalo- poden, Pteropoden und Heteropoden bekannt ist.” According to de Graaf the Epiphysis, in Amphibia and Reptiles (Lacertilia), arises as a hollow outgrowth of the thalamencephalon,”? never passing much beyond this stage in Urodeles (Pl. 2, figs. 13—18), but in Anura and Lacertilia becoming divided into two parts. In the former, growth results in the formation of a distal bladder-shaped portion and a solid stalk connecting this with the brain-roof (Pl. 2, figs. 22—29) ; the distal part is gradually constricted off from the stalk and comes to lie excerebrally and finally without the cranium and close beneath the skin; the stalk, on the other hand, lies permanently within the brain membranes and thus enclosed in the skull cavity. In the adult, he says, the cut-off portion of the epiphysis (‘ Stieda’s gland”) lies embedded in the cutis close beneath the epidermis, is surrounded by a specially close-woven case, 1 (a) “Zur Anatomie und Entwickelung der Epiphyse bei Amphibien und Reptilien,” ‘ Zool. Anzeig.,’ 29th March, 1886. (4) ‘ Bijdrage tot de kennis van den bouw en de ontwickkeling der epiphyse bij Amphibién en Reptilién,’ van Henri W. de Graaf, Leiden, 1886. 2 He thus differs from Goette in regarding the epiphysis as a secondary outgrowth, having nothing to do with the neuropore. 174 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. ‘ and shows retrogressive metamorphosis, undergoing fatty degeneration. What Goette regarded as the epiphysial stalk is, according to Graaf, nothing more than a branch of the Ramus supra-maxillaris of the fifth nerve, and always terminates in the connective-tissue case, never in the organ itself. The extra-cranial part, though present in the adult Rana esculenta, R. temporaria, Alytes obstetricans, Bombinator ingens, and Bufo cinerea, is completely wanting in the full-grown Hyla arborea. In Reptilia the development of the epiphysis takes place as in Amphibia, the distal portion being, according to de Graaf, completely cut off from the proximal stalk; it lies between the brain membranes and has the form of a small, roundish, more or less flattened out vesicle, and shows cellular structure. The wall lying in contact with the parietal foramen is thickened and lens shaped, whilst the hinder wall is pigmented on its inner side. De Graaf describes in some detail and figures (Pl. 4, figs. 32—34) the organ in Anguis fragilis. Reference to this description will be made later on. Results of the present investigation. I desire in the first place to acknowledge the kindness of Dr. Ginther, to whom I am indebted for the gift of examples of different genera (indicated by an asterisk in the list below) from the duplicate specimens of the British Museum; my thanks are also due to Professor Stewart for the opportunity of examining specimens of Iguana and Varanus from the. collection of the Royal College of Surgeons. To E. B. Poulton, Esq., of Keble College, and to F. Beddard, Esq., of the Zoological Society, I am indebted for specimens of Hatteria. My thanks also are due to Professor Westwood for the gift of a fine Chameleo vulgaris, and for the opportunity of examining C. bifurcatus; and to G. C. Bourne, Esq., of New College, for a specimen of Gecko mauritanicus. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 175 I have also to acknowledge gratefully the gift of various species of Lacertilia, prepared especially and sent to me from the Bahamas by J. Gardiner, Esq.; they arrived too late for the results of their examination to be included in the present article, but I hope to be able to publish an account of the structure of the organ in these forms in a short time. The forms investigated have been the following : ‘Hatteria punctata. Lyriocephalus scutatus. ‘“*Varanus giganteus. **Calotes versicola. me bengalensis. ae ophiomaca. -Monitor (sp. ?). -*Agama hispida. - Ameiva corvina. & *Stellio cordylina. »-Chameleo vulgaris. * *Grammatophora barbata. * s bifurcatus. <~*Moloch horridus. -Gecko verus. Leiodera nitida. » Mauritanicus. x Anguis fragilis. ~-Anolis (various species). « Cyclodus gigas. Leiolemus tenuis. » Lacerta ocellata. *Uraniscodon (Plica) umbra. 4 viridis. **Iguana tuberculata. 3 (Zootoca) vivipara. «* Draco volans. ««Seps chalcidica. -*Ceratophora aspera. The material has, in the great majority of cases, consisted of spirit specimens in a better or worse state of preservation so far as histological structure was concerned, so that in many instances it has been impossible to do much more than ascer- tain the presence or absence of the organ, its connection or separation from the proximal part of the epiphysis, and perhaps a few details with regard to its histological structure. Even in ‘fresh specimens the organ lies so deeply embedded in connec- tive tissue and so closely shut in by bone, which must be removed along with it to prevent injury to the structure, that there is great difficulty in rapidly reaching it with reagents. Of two of the most important forms—Hatteria punctata and Varanus giganteus—I have had the great advantage, through Professor Moseley’s kindness, of examining fresh specimens, and have thus been able to investigate more care- fully the structure of the retina. 176 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. In the account which follows the structure of the organ is described separately in the different forms examined; this structure, as might have been expected to be the case in an organ of this kind (which must be regarded as in a more or less rudimentary condition), shows considerable variation, even amongst species of the same genus. I hope on a future occa- sion to describe the organ in other forms of Lacertilia. Hatteria punctata, Pl. XIV, figs. 2, 3,4, and 5; Pl. XV, figs. 7 and 8; Pl X Xo as. 7: (1) External Appearance.—There is in Hatteria but very little external trace of the eye, no special scale being modified into a “ cornea ;” an absence of pigment, however, in the skin of the median line, slightly posterior to the level of the paired eyes, indicates the position of the parietal foramen ; this external indication being more evident in some than in others. (2) Position of the Eye.—The foramen itself is filled up by a plug of connective tissue, which, notwithstanding the absence of pigment, must effectually prevent the organ lying beneath from functioning as an eye in the ordinary sense of the word; light would more easily penetrate the skin at this than at any other portion of the surface of the head, but yet it is perfectly impossible for an image to be formed upon the retina. The fibres of the connective tissue in the foramen may be divided into two sets—(1) an outer set (Pl. XV, fig. 7, Cf) arranged on the whole at right angles to the surface of the head, and which on the inner side of the foramen are con- nected with (2) an inner set lying immediately in front of the eye, and arranged so as practically to form a hemisphere, part of the internal surface of which forms the anterior boundary of a capsule enclosing the eye (figs. 2, 7, and 8, Ci). The hinder half of the capsule which thus lies in the lower part of the foramen is formed of somewhat loosely aggregated fibres with well-marked nuclei scattered irregularly amongst them, and is drawn out in the direction of the optic stalk, which, together with a blood-vessel, pierces the capsule wall at its PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 177 most posterior point (fig. 2); the extreme length of the cap- sule is 1*4 mm. Special fibres cross from the capsule wall to the edge of the lens, and, being connected with the tissue immediately surrounding the retina, may serve the purpose of keeping the eye in position, and thus represent the rudiment of a structure of importance when the eye was fully func- tional. The capsule in its hinder part contains much irre- gularly scattered connective tissue with nuclei, its anterior part, however, being free from them. Within the capsule breaks up an artery (figs. 2 and 7, B.v.) whose branches ramify -amongst the fibres behind the eye; this special blood supply is a prominent feature in connection with the organ in all the forms examined. The eye lies with its long axis directed upwards and for- wards in the most anterior part of the capsule; figs. 7 and 8 show the relative position of the eye in its capsule with regard to the brain and the parietal foramen. Structure of the Eye.—Through the kindness of Prof. Moseley I have been able to examine the structure in a fresh specimen, and, notwithstanding. the fact that the organ cannot now be fully functional, the retina is fairly well developed. The eye has, roughly speaking, the shape in section (PI. XIV, fig. 2) of a cone, the base of which lies turned towards the surface, whilst the pineal stalk is connected with the apex. The walls of the optic vesicle are divided into two parts, (1) an anterior; (2) a posterior; of which the former forms the lens, and the latter the sensitive structures. (1) Lens.—The lens of the pineal thus differs markedly from that of the paired eyes, where it originates as a secondary structure by invagination of the epiblast, whilst in the former it is apparently directly the product of the brain wall itself, and equivalent in position to that part of the paired optic vesicles which after invagination forms the retinal elements. De Graaf has likened the eye to that of such Invertebrates as Cephalopods and Pteropods ; but, apart from other differ- ences which exist between the two in regard to both develop- ment and structure, the lens is not in the least degree com- 178 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. parable in the two cases, being in the Invertebrates mentioned formed as a cuticular secretion. In Hatteria as in all forms examined it is distinctly cellular, the nuclei being prominent and numerous (fig. 2). The median cells are elongate so as to give the lens a curious cone shape, the base corresponding to the front of the eye and the apex lying in the optic axis; the cells are further arranged in a definite manner as shown in fig. 2, and are, as the latter indicates, directly continuous with those of the retina. (2) Retina.— The retinal elements are arranged in the manner typical of Invertebrates, i.e. the rods lie on the inner side bounding the cavity of the optic vesicle, the nerve enter- ing posteriorly and not spreading out in front of the rods. Within the same vertebrate animal we thus find eyes developed on both vertebrate and invertebrate types, both being also formed fromthe modification of the walls of hollow outgrowths of the brain. The retina consists of the following elements (Pl. XIV, figs. 2, 3, 4, and 5): (1) A layer of rod-like bodies (R) enveloped in deep pig- ment, which when the rods are separated (fig. 5) is seen to be so deposited upon them as to produce a striated appearance. The pigment is specially densely deposited around the margin of the retina in contact with the lens, extending here through the whole thickness of the wall. A curious specialisation takes place in connection with the rods lying in the optic axis, which also obtains in the pineal eye of many other forms. The rods in this portion are elongated (R') to at least twice the length of the ordinary ones, and are in connection at their outer ends with a special group of nucleated cells (n*) which lie enclosed by a somewhat definite membrane in the pineal stalk, with the fibres of which they are directly connected (fig. 4). (2) A double and, in parts, triple row of spherical nucleated elements (n!), which appear to be connected by processes, on the one hand with the rods, and on the other with the layers external tothem. They surround posteriorly the elongate rods, PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 179 and their processes in this region run in many cases (n*) directly into connection with the fibres of the optic stalk. The layer gradually thins out anteriorly until that part is reached where, in the neighbourhood of the lens, the pigment is present through the whole breadth of the wall. In its thickest part the whole layer (consisting of the double or triple row of elements) is about the same breadth as the layer of rods. (3) External to the spherical elements lies a thin layer con- sisting of a fine punctated material, which takes the stain (heematoxylin) with difficulty but contains numerous scattered fine pigment granules. Into this, which may be called the Molecular layer,' pass processes from the retinal elements on either side (fig. 2, mo.). The layer in question is a very thin one in Hatteria punctata, but forms, when seen in section (fig. 2), a definite boundary line separating the retinal elements into an internal and an external division. Poste- riorly the layer spreads out and surrounds the specially elongated rods in the optic axis, anteriorly it reaches as far forwards as the ring of pigment surrounding the lens. It is possible that this layer and many of the processes passing into it may be of the nature of supporting structures. (4) A layer of nucleated spherical elements (fig. 3, n”) lying close to the molecular layer, and distinguished from those on the inner side by their greater size; they are arranged so as to alternate (the alternate arrangement is, however, by no means perfectly constant) with ‘ (5) A layer of cone-shaped bodies (Co.) in which no nuclei can be detected. They lie with their broad ends externally, and gradually taper internally till their pointed ends are closely in contact with the molecular layer into which pro- cessses from them run (fig. 3). (6) Between the bases of the above are a series of spindle- shaped elements with nuclei, from which processes pass off internally, which may either run directly into the molecular layer or into the spherical bodies on its external side. At the ' Cf. de Graaf, Pl. 4, fig. 34, g/. 180 W. BALDWIN SPENOER. posterior part (i.e. near the pineal stalk) the cone-shaped elements seem to be absent, and their place to be taken by large nucleated spindles (Co), which, as it were, bend round internally (fig. 5) and give off processes running directly into the fibres of the stalk. Connection with the Brain.—It has hitherto been stated by all writers that the distal part of the epiphysis becomes separated from the proximal which forms the pineal gland of the adult, and that the former comes to lie (as shown by de Graaf in Anguis fragilis) external to the cranial cavity in the parietal foramen. De Graaf! figures in Anguis the eye as fitted closely into the parietal foramen encased by con- nective tissue, but separated by a considerable interval from the proximal hollow epiphysial stalk from which in develop- ment it has been cut off. In Hatteria, as also in several other forms to be described below, longitudinal vertical sections show clearly that the highly developed eye is connected with the epiphysis by a solid and well-marked stalk, which may be called the pineal stalk. This runs in the median line backwards and slightly down- wards ; it enters the eye at the posterior end, the walls of the optic vesicle being here (fig. 2) drawn out somewhat back- wards. The relationship of the elongated rods to the stalk has been already described ; passing backwards from the eye the stalk makes a decided bend upwards, then pierces the wall of the eye capsule at its most posterior point and runs straight back to the epiphysis; its fibres enter the latter, being appa- rently connected with the cells of the apex and the under surface. The pineal stalk contains elements which have much the appearance of those found at an early stage in the deve- loping nerve of the paired eyes, that is, they much resemble cells which are undergoing a process of elongation so as to form long fibres (figs. 2 and 4); some having undergone considerable elongation, others being yet spindle shaped. There can be little doubt that this median, azygos, nerve 1 Pl. 4, figs. 31, 32, 33, and 34. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 181 represents the originally hollow process uniting the proximal with the distal portion of the epiphysis, and which, losing its connection with the optic vesicle in some forms (e.g. Anguis), is in others (e.g. Hatteria) transformed into a solid stalk serving as the nerve of the pineal eye. It has been sufficiently ‘demonstrated that the latter is the distal portion of the epi- physis, and we are thus presented with a new sensory structure —the pineal eye—agreeing precisely with the paired eyes in (1) its development as an outgrowth from the walls of the neural canal, and (2) the formation of its nerve by the gradual solidifi- cation of the primitively hollow tube connecting the distal vesicle with the proximal portion of the outgrowth. In the case of the paired eyes the whole of the outgrowth save the vesicle is transformed into a nerve; in the pineal eye only the median part of the outgrowth is thus metamorphosed, the proximal part retaining its originally hollow nature. VWaranus cicantews, Pl XPV fie 1) figs Ger PEK; fig. 10; Pl. XIX, fig. 34. External Appearance.—In a large specimen of this animal, measuring six feet one inch from the snout to the tip of the tail, which I was enabled to examine in the fresh state through Professor Moseley’s kindness, the external indication of the eye is so clear that it is remarkable that no one has hitherto examined the organ lying beneath. The head is covered with small, deeply-pigmented tubercle-like scales, save in the median line, where, somewhat posterior to the paired eyes, a single large scale is present, standing out prominently by reason of its creamy whiteness (fig. 10). The scale is roughly hexagonal in shape, measuring 5 mm. across, and has upon it a slightly-raised circular rim, the area within which has the appearance of a transparent membrane drawn tensely over a cavity beneath. A dark circular spot in the middle, visible in the living animal, indicates the position of the eye, and is, as will subsequently be shown, due to the presence of a mass of pigment in the lens. In the matter of 182 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. external indication of the structure Varanus thus differs much from Hatteria in the possession of this scale, modified to form a cornea. Position of the Eye.—The cornea thus formed lies imme- mediately above the parietal foramen, the space in which is tightly filled by connective tissue, in the midst of which again lies the pineal eye. There is thus no real cavity beneath the cornea, but the pigment, which elsewhere is abundantly present in the skin, is here entirely absent, so that by this means the passage of light to the organ is much facilitated. Beneath the epidermis and the rete mucosum the connective-tissue fibres of the cutis vera are arranged in two definite sets, as in Hatteria: (1) a series running parallel to the anterior surface of the eye from side to side of the foramen (PI. XIV, fig. 1, Ct”), interlacing with each other, and thus forming a dome- shaped structure above the eye; and (2) a series of bundles (Ct) at right angles to the former, upon which they spread out at their internal ends, whilst externally they run outwards to the rete mucosum. Obliquely directed strands pass from one bundle to another, and the irregular spaces thus left are filled up by a meshwork of indefinitely arranged fibres. Immediately below the level of the first series of fibres is placed the eye itself, but, instead of lying, as in Hatteria, ina capsule, the connective tissue closely invests it. The tissue within the parietal foramen may be divided into three parts: (1) a series (Ct*) bounding the sides of the parietal foramen, and continuous with the upper series (C7¢'); these follow in their course the outline of the bone; (2) irregularly arranged fibres (Cz*), filling up the greater part of the foramen; (8) a series forming a special encasement for the eye, to the sides of which their long axes are parallel (C¢*, the arrangement of these is scarcely made sufficiently prominent in the figure). In Hatteria is found a special capsule in the space within which the eye is situate. Even in this form a certain amount of connective tissue les within the capsule, whilst a still greater development of the tissue would lead to the condition which obtains in Varanus giganteus. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 183 In addition: to the connective tissue within the foramen a large blood-vessel is present, which, accompanying the optic stalk till the foramen is reached, breaks up in this into nume- rous branches ramifying in the connective tissue (B.v.), a branch finally passing from either side in front of the eye (fig. 1), whilst one pierces the connective-tissue dome. Structure of the Hye.—The eye is, though the size of the two specimens of Hatteria and Varanus are so dif- ferent (Hatteria under 2 ft., Varanus 6 ft.), as nearly as possible precisely the same size in both, measuring, in the line of the optic axis, °4 mm., but in Varanus the eye is compressed somewhat in this direction, so that it is broader from side to side slightly than in Hatteria (cf. figs. 1 and 2). Lens.—The lens is distinctly cellular in structure, the cells being elongated in the direction of the optic axis, and having the appearance of stretching the whole breadth of the lens, their nuclei, which are very prominent, being situated so that in section (fig. 1) they form a well-marked line across the lens from side to side somewhat nearer to the inner than the outer surface. The whole lens has the appearance represented in fig. 1, being thickest in the median line and thinning away rapidly at each side where it joins the retina. Right in its very middle is present a large, more or less globular mass of small spherical cells, deeply pigmented (fig. 1, pig.), and lying directly in the optic axis. The presence of these must of necessity interfere with the action of the organ as an eye, in fact, the whole structure is characterised by the presence of a great amount of pigment deposited in every part. It is this pigment in the lens which causes the eye seen through the transparent cornea to appear like a black spot, and its presence, which must be regarded as due to degeneracy in the tissues, indicates that the organ is now in a rudimentary condition. Structure of Retina.—The rods line the cavity of the vesicle and form a very definite layer, being deeply embedded in pigment, which renders it difficult to distinguish their out- lines. Processes pass from them, often accompanied by pig- ment granules, into the external-lying layers. Asin Hatteria 184 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. certain of the rods become elongated ; this lengthening is con fined in the former to those lying in the optic axis;but in Varanus takes place at two points, one of which, the most prominent, lies in the optic axis, whilst the other lies to the anterior side, each being connected with the entrance of a separate nervous strand into the eye. Amongst the rods are scattered numerous spherical masses of pigment. There is not the slightest indication of any struc- tures lying internal to the rods embedded in pigment, such as are described by de Graaf in Anguis; on the other hand, the internal limit of the layer of rods is so well marked as to present the appearance of a definite membrane lining the cavity. The latter was most probably filled during life by a fluid, the coagulated remains of which are seen attached as an irregular structureless coagulum to the inner ends of the rods. External to the rods is a layer of finely punctated material (Mo) apparently corresponding to the much narrower layer in Hatteria. This layer, together with the rods, occupies as nearly as possible one half of the breadth of the retina. In this layer are situated spherical elements (n!), which in some cases can be traced into connection with the rods; no arrange- ment in two or more rows, asin Hatteria, can be detected, but they appear to be placed somewhat irregularly. External to the molecular layer, the outer limit of which is somewhat sharply defined, lie a series of spherical-shaped elements (n2). The appearance of these as seen in section is given in fig. 6. Some of the elements resemble those lying within the mole- cular layer (n'), others have processes passing straight through to the rods on the internal and the nerve-fibres on the external side, whilst others again are connected with one another and with the layers on either side by irregularly branching pro- cesses. Certain of the nerve-fibres pass round behind the vesicle and then enter the retinal elements, but apparently the greater number are directly connected with the two above-described bundles of elongated rods. Within the external layers of the retina are many large PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 185 spherical masses of deep brown pigment (pzg.'), connected in some cases with the pigment enclosing the rods ; beyond this, again, a certain amount of pigment in minute granules is scattered irregularly amongst the external spherical elements, and completely external to the optic vesicle posteriorly is massed around the entrance of the nerve a great amount of pigment deposited in branchial cells (pig.’). Nerve.—The pineal stalk is well marked in Varanus giganteus and differs moreover from anything met with amongst other forms (even other genera of Varanus).' Instead of being single there are three distinct nervous strands entering the vesicle posteriorly ; two of these are more promi- nent than the third, which appears to be in connection with the anterior of the former; the single posteriorly placed nerve entering very nearly but not quite in the line of the optic axis. The larger and smaller anterior strands join together, and then, after a marked curve, shared in by the posterior one, they join the latter and run back as the solid pineal stalk to the proximal part of the epiphysis. At first it seemed possible that the appearance described might be due to the cutting im longitudinal section of the walls of a hollow stalk distorted somewhat by reagents, but an examination of a continuous series soon showed that this was not the case, and that the pineal stalk, single proxi- mally, broke up distally into two, and finally into three separate nerves entering the optic vesicle. The most noticeable features in the eye of Varanus are: (1) The great development of pigment in all parts, and more especially in the lens. (2) The curious nature of the retina, which has really the form of a cellular network ; the cells being in connection with one another by branched processes, the nuclei being scattered somewhat irregularly and giving rise, together with the proto- plasm around them, to the spherical elements of the retina. ‘ The only other lizard as yet examined, in which anything comparable to this is found, is Lacerta ocellata, to be described Jater on. 186 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. ‘ Reference to this structure of the retina will be made again when dealing with the epiphysis in Cyclodus. (3) The triple nature of the pineal stalk. Varanus bengalensis, Pl. XV, fig. 12; Pl. XVI, fig. 17; Pl. XIX, figs. 37 and 41. External Indication.—In the several specimens of V ara- nus examined (in addition to V. giganteus) the external in- dication of the eye was very clear indeed, consisting of a large, modified, median scale (Pl. XIX, fig. 37), lying somewhat posterior to the level of the paired eyes, and having at its centre a circular dark space, surrounded at a short distance by a dark circular line. The central part, which is to a certain extent transparent, acts as a cornea for the eye placed beneath. Position of the Eye.—In small specimens of Varanus, when the skin is removed from the head, the pineal eye is removed with it and may be examined whole. Fig. 12 repre- sents a portion of the skull roof of a very young specimen of V. bengalensis viewed from the under surface, the bone being very thin indeed. The portion surrounding the parietal foramen is represented in the figure, together with the pineal eye, lying in the latter and viewed as a solid object. The foramen has a somewhat oval shape and backwards from it leads a groove in the median line. The specimen from which this is taken was not in good histological preservation, and no connection with the brain can be traced. The eye is circular in outline and depressed from above downwards, and shows, when viewed by transmitted light, the rods embedded in pig- ment and forming a very definite layer. Since they line a space within the vesicle, circular in outline, those at the sides, when the object is viewed from above or below, form a circle (R), external to which lie the other elements of the retina. In the optic axis posteriorly lies a prominent mass of rods more deeply pigmented than elsewhere, and which indicate most probably a series of elongated rods connected with the union of the pineal stalk; the latter may have been pulled away along with the PINEAL BYE IN LACERTILIA. 187 ‘ brain membranes when the surface of the skull was removed from above the brain. The connective tissue lying external to the eye is quite transparent, and being placed as it is immediately beneath the skin, the entrance of light is thus made possible ; in fact, it is impossible to prevent the light from entering, not only in this but in the case of the pineal eyes of all other Lacertilia, when they are placed so near to the skin. In section, the eye of a somewhat larger V. bengalensis shows the following structure differing much from that of V. gigauteus, a difference the more noticeable since it exists between members of the same genus. Fig. 41 represents a longitudinal section along the median line of the head passing through the parietal foramen; the results are represented somewhat diagrammatically. The eye hes within the foramen tightly enclosed again within connec- tive tissue, no special capsule being present. A very notice- able feature is the entire absence of pigment above the eye, though this is present in abundance in the skin elsewhere (Ct, pig.) in the connective tissue of the cutis vera. The eye itself is depressed dorso-ventrally, so that but comparatively little space remains within the vesicle; the latter lies directly above the anterior extremity of the proximal part of the epiphysis, which runs right up into the foramen from the dorsal wall of the thalamencephalon lying some distance posteriorly. Fig. 17 gives a more detailed representation of the foramen with its contents. Beneath the cuticle (cu.) the epidermis is seen (ep.), then the rete mucosum, the nucleated cells of which are in this part somewhat longer than those elsewhere ; beneath this lies the connective tissue of the cutis vera (Ct). On either side of the foramen are numerous pigment cells (Ct¢, pzg.), and the fibres as before may be divided into two series—(1) a set running at right angles to the long axis of the head, and (2) others form- ing a roof for the foramen, and connected with those lying within the latter, which form a close investment for the eye (C?*). Within the foramenalso isamuch branched blood-vessel which enters along with the epiphysial stalk; a small branch passes for- VOL, XXVII, RART 2,—NEW SER, 0 188 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. ward on either side in front of the eye just asin V. giganteus. The figure shows the specialisation in the connective tissue above the eye, and the entire absence of pigment-bearing cells in the same position, though they are present on both sides in the section. Lens.—The lens has very much the same structure as in V. giganteus, being distinctly cellular with well-marked nuclei, forming in section a double or triple row from side to side, the cells appearing to run the whole breadth, whilst in the middle of the lens a great mass of pigment is deposited in the line of the optic axis. The pigment masses are spherical on the external, and more rod-like on the internal surface. Structure of Retina.—The specimen being preserved in spirits without special reference to histological work, it was somewhat difficult to make out many points with regard to the structure of the retina. The rods are well developed and pro- minent, lining the cavity of the vesicle, and having their long axes arranged as indicated in the figure, those in the optic axis being at right angles to the external surface, the eye itself being immovably fixed, so as to look directly upwards. They are em- bedded in pigment, and none amongst them appear to be specially elongated (associated, doubtless, with the absence of connection with any nerve, suchasis present in V. giganteus or Hatteria). No trace of any definite structure internal to the rods can be seen. External to the rods lie a series of spherical-shaped elements (n'), corresponding, presumably, to the same in Hatteria and V. giganteus, and at intervals amongst these can be detected spindle-shaped bodies, which, together with the former, stain easily (with hematoxylin and borax-carmine). Both these he within a layer, consisting, as in V. giganteus, of finely-punc- tated material, whose external limit is well defined. It is difficult to ascertain precisely the structure of this particular layer, which in these two (as well as in other forms) has the appearance of a ground substance, in which lie the external ends of the rods and the spherical elements, but its constant presence and character renders it unlikely that it is the result simply of reagents ; it is here called the molecular layer, but may, perhaps, differ in nature from the layer to which the same name is applied in Hatteria, PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 189 External to this lies a series of cone-shaped bodies (Co.), the pointed internal ends of which abut against the molecular layer, their broader external extremities being placed against the limiting membrane of the eye, where a certain amount of pigment (pig.') is deposited in the form of fine granules. In some cases a connection (not well drawn in the figure) can be traced between the cones and the rods, or, in other cases, the spheri- cal elements. This connection is best developed in the optic axis. Epiphysis.—In a preliminary communication to the Royal Society! the eye of one specimen of V. bengalensis was de- scribed as connected with the brain by a hollow epiphysial stalk. Further investigations have shown that this statement must be modified. It is by no means easy to determine the point, and possibly with a fresh specimen a connection between the eye and the proximal portion of the epiphysis may be shown | to exist. The two come very close together (closer than is represented in fig. 17), and there is a decided appearance of a connection between them. Further study of my sections has failed to establish the poimt, and fig. 17 represents, as far as can at present be ascertained, the actual state. The epiphysis (fig. 41) may be divided into three parts: (1) the distal, separated off as the pineal eye; (2) a short, hollow, proximal portion, arising from the roof of the thalamencephalon, and running at right angles to this; and (3) a median portion running forward from the end of the latter along the roof of the cranial cavity enclosed in the brain membranes. This part also is hollow, and its walls consist of a single layer of distinctly nucleated columnar cells. Its distal extremity lies immediately beneath the pineal eye, and is swollen out and filled with blood- corpuscles, the cells in the wall of this part being somewhat cubical in shape. Passing backward the walls approach one another until they come into contact, and for a short distance a solid stalk is formed; further back, again, the walls part from each other, and in this region the cells lengthen out very much until they pass into the proximal part (fig. 41). 1 «Proc. R.8.,’ ‘* Preliminary Communication on the Structure and Pre- sence in Sphenodon and other Lizards of the Median Eye, described by de Graaf in Anguis fragilis,” June 10th, 1886. 190 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. Monitor (sp. ?).—In the Monitor examined there was no external trace of the organ to be discerned, though when the skin was removed from the dorsal surface of the head and viewed by transmitted light, an absence of pigment and general transparency in the spot overlying the parietal foramen indicated the position of the eye. The latter could be easily distinguished as a small black spot lying within the foramen, which was itself. in the form examined, extremely small. Unfortunately the specimen was in a bad state of preservation histologically, and the tissues very dry, so that it was again impossible to make out the details of the structure. The eye, which is deeply pigmented save anteriorly, where is the lens, appears to be placed at the distal extremity of a pineal stalk which, as in Varanus giganteus, runs up vertically through the foramen, accompanied as usual by a large artery. Chameleo vulgaris, Pl. XVI, fig. 21; Pl. XIX, fig. 40 ; Pl. XX, fig. 6. In this form a curious modification takes place, an optic vesicle being formed but not reaching any high degree of development. In the short account written in ‘ Nature,’! it was stated in a note that the organ was present in Chameleo vulgaris—a statement of which de Graaf has subsequently denied the truth. He says that though the parietal foramen is open in the young form it becomes closed as the adult state is reached, and that there can be thus no organ remaining in connection with the proximal part of the epiphysis. Before reading his note, and subsequently to the publication in ‘Nature,’ three more adult specimens were cut in section (the first note was based upon a dissection), with the result that each one has fully confirmed the statement that the organ is present in Chameleo, and moreover remains in connection with the proximal part of the epiphysis, though it certainly is in a comparatively low state of development. External Indication.—The presence of the organ is indicated in both Chameleo vulgaris and Chameleo 1 ©Nature,’ May 13th, 1886. PINEAL BYE IN LACERTILIA. 191 bifurcatus by a tubercle slightly depressed below the level of the surrounding ones, and having a very transparent appear- ance ;! it lies in the median line just in front of the anterior end of the strongly marked ridge, which occupies the dorsal surface of the head posteriorly. Fig. 40 gives a diagrammatic view of the relationship of the different parts; the parietal foramen is not large but is still clearly present, and very easily distinguishable in sections. Within it and lying immediately beneath the modified tubercle is the optic vesicle ; elsewhere as usual the skin is deeply pig- mented, but the pigment cells are entirely wanting above the vesicle, a fact which is especially noticeable in sections of this animal, the cells having long processes and being closely packed together (fig. 21). It is this absence of pigment which produces the transparent effect in the tubercle. The surface of the latter is very convex, and beneath it the layers of the skin are arranged as usual, a series of special connective-tissue fibres forming an encasement for the vesicle. Within the foramen there is the customary well-marked and branching blood-vessel (6.v.), which accompanies the pineal stalk. Structure of Vesicle-—In Chameleo the structure of the vesicle is very simple. It has the form of a hollow sphere whose walls have been compressed dorso-ventrally, so that its greatest length lies in the line of the long axis of the head. Its walls are formed of elongated distinctly nucleated cells, those facing into the cavity bearing long cilia; no pigment is present and there is no differentiation into lens and retina, the cells of the anterior and posterior walls of the vesicle being alike. Posteriorly the imner wall of the vesicle is, as it were, drawn downwards (fig. 21), a small horn-like space being thus formed, turned somewhat towards the pineal stalk ; its general appearance conveys the idea of the vesicle having at first had the relationship to the then open pineal stalk which is at present shown by the swollen distal extremity to the epiphysial tube in Cyclodus.. By the meeting of the walls of the epi- physial tube the vesicle would become closed, and the solid 1 The external indication is much clearer in some than in other specimens, 192 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. pineal stalk formed; this would be attached primitively to the posterior end, and the bending of the cells of the vesicle wall (fig. 21) make it appear as if a subsequent drawing down of the stalk to the ventral surface had taken place. In the specimens examined the stalk is seen to end anteriorly some- what sharply against the under surface of the vesicle, at any rate, in this part none of its fibres could be traced into the cells above, though, as the specimens examined were not specially preserved for histological purposes, it is quite possible that with fresh ones a connection might be demonstrated. Posteriorly, however, where the drawing down of the wall occurs the fibres and cells are in connection with each other. The pineal stalk itself is avery definite structure, running from the under surface of the vesicle downwardsand slightly backwards, till just without the parietal foramen, where it joins the hollow epiyhysial stalk running backward to the roof of the thalamence- phalon. In structure it resembles closely that of Hatteria. Gecko verus. Neither in the adult nor in the embryo is there the slightest external trace of the organ, the skin being tuberculated and capable of being lifted up from the head without remaining attached in the position of the parietal foramen. There is no discernible trace of the latter: in lizards in which it is present the skin cannot be removed wholly from the surface of the head. Sections show that the epiphysis is a well-marked structure in Platydactylus arising from the roof of the thalamence- phalon and running straight upwards till it comes into contact with the roof of the cranial cavity. This portion corresponds to the proximal part of the structure in other forms, and appa- rently the pineal stalk, which usually runs forward from this along the dura mater, as well as the distal portion modified into the pineal eye, are both absent in Gecko. The epiphysis is hollow and its cavity gradually increases in size as it passes further from the roof of the brain and approaches the skull, against which it ends blindly ; there is no differentiation in its walls, so far as could be discerned, to form an optic vesicle. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 193 The same structure is present in Gecko verus and Gecko mauritanicus. Ameiva corvina. Ameiva externally agrees with Platydactylus in the absence of a modified scale to function as a cornea; the skin of the head is also easily removable, not being attached in the position of the foramen, which is also wanting in this species. I have not yet examined it by means of sections, but as far as can be told it agrees with Gecko. Anolis, Pl. XV, fig. 11; Pl. XVII, fig: 24. It is not my intention in this paper to describe the structure of the eye of Anolis in any great detail, as before long I hope, by the kindness of Mr. J. Gardiner, to be enabled to describe, by means of specimens prepared carefully by him, the eyes of several species of Anolis from the Bahamas. The eye of one specimen has, however, been figured viewed as a solid object from beneath (fig. 11). The brain membranes are represented, the dura mater having branched pigment-cells scattered over it, and having a specially dark ring around the margin of the parietal foramen in which lies the eye. The latter is somewhat elliptical in shape, its long axis lying in the same line with that of the head: the eye is compressed dorso-ventrally, and when compared with the organin Varanus bengalensis (fig. 12), placed by its side, the rods are seen to be much larger than in the latter ; the cavity within the optic vesicle, whose size is in- dicated by the circular space bounded by the inner ends of the rods, being hence considerably less in Anolis than in Varanus. Fig. 24 (Pl. XVIT) is a drawing of the eye of another species of Anolis from the West Indies. The organ lies in the foramen with its upper surface close beneath the surface of the head. Its shape is unlike that of any form described hitherto, being elongated in a dorso-ventral direction. The lens is cellular and its hinder border is deeply convex towards the cavity of the vesicle, calling to mind somewhat the shape of the structure n Hatteria; in the optic axis certain of the 194 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. cells are apparently undergoing degeneration, pigment being deposited in them. Retina.—The hinder wall of the vesicle forming the retina is thinnest where it joins the lens and thickest posteriorly. The whole is noticeable by reason of a great development of pigment, which appears to surround all the elements. The rods (R.) are very well marked and in some cases, especially in the line of the optic axis, present the appearance of being striated ; in the latter position also they are especially elongated. At their external ends they seem to be connected with spherical elements (n), also embedded in pigment; these are united by means of processes, rendered evident again by pigment deposited upon them, with a layer of elements apparently corresponding to the cone-shaped bodies of other retinas (Co.). In its most pos- terior region theelements seem to be inconnection with the fibres of the optic stalk (Op. s.), which runs downwards and backwards within the vacuolate tissue filling up the parietal foramen. Leiolemus tenuis. The external indication of the eye is very clear in the specimen; the scale is in the usual position and surrounded by a series ar- ranged in a circular manner around it as a centre, the two pos- terior ones being larger than the other four. In the middle of the eye-scale itself lies the circular cornea, white and dome-shaped. Sections show that the eye is present beneath, the walls of the vesicle being differentiated into a transparent cellular lens an- teriorly and a retina posteriorly ; the rods are enveloped in pig- ment, and the latter is deposited also through the whole thickness of the retina. The whole organ had shrunk so much that it was impossible again to do more than recognise the presence of the structure, and the fact that it was differentiated into an eye; the proximal part of the epiphysis stretches, in the dura mater, very nearly to the eye, but whether there is or is not any connection between the two could not be determined. In this form also pigment is present in great abundance in the skin, and its absence above the eye is a marked feature in sections. PINEAL BYE IN LACERTILIA. 195 Plica (Uraniscodon) umbra. In this the external indication is particularly clear. The scales on the dorsal surface of the head are small, save one whose great size renders it prominent; in the centre of this a small, white, slightly dome-shaped structure indicates the position of the eye beneath. Position of the eye.—The organ lies very far forward on the dorsal surface, being placed (Pl. XIX, fig. 35) over the anterior region of the cerebral hemispheres; it is situated within the parietal foramen, the size of which is far greater than that of the eye itself, which lies embedded in connective tissue. The usual absence of pigment immediately above it is to be noted. Structure.—The organ was not in a good enough state of preservation histologically to render any detailed examination of its structure possible. So far as could be discerned the con- nection of the eye with the epiphysis is retained, the solid pineal stalk (Op. s.) running backward immediately within the skull cavity. Attention may be drawn to one curious point—close to the eye is a small secondary and deeply pigmented vesicle (op!.). It may be possible that in the specimen examined this is merely due to a shrinkage of the walls of the whole optic vesicle, whereby the anterior and posterior have come into close contact, and thus simulated the appearance of two vesicles, but, as far as could be ascertained, this was not the case. The deep pigmentation of the anterior as well as the posterior wall is strong evidence against this view. Iguana tuberculata, Pl. XV, figs. 15 and 16; Pl. XXVII, fig. 23. The full description of the organ, which is present highly developed in Iguana is not given in this paper. I hope before long to have the opportunity of examining its structure in a living specimen. External Indication.—The usual modified scale is present and in large specimens is very conspicuous. In smaller ones (Pl. XV, fig. 16) a shghtly raised central portion is present, 196 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. which is devoid of pigment, and transparent enough to allow of the eye beneath being seen as a dark spot. In larger speci- mens (fig. 15) the central part is still more raised, and forms a dome-shaped structure. In the figure, which is twice the size of the original, the scales from the dorsal surface of the head are represented, and the prominence of the scale with its modification to form a cornea can be seen. The only wonder again is that long before this a careful examination of the structure has not been made. Structure.—The eye lies within the parietal foramen, which is well developed in Iguana, surrounded closely by connective tissue, there being no capsule present. The eye is so placed that its optic axis is as nearly as possible in the vertical line. In shape it simply resembles an inverted cup with the lens, which has a flattened external surface, occupying the anterior end. The organ is usually more cup-shaped and symmetrical than the one figured (Pl. XVII, fig. 23) ; but this, which is drawn without any of its surroundings, will serve to demon- strate the structure as far as it will be described in the present communication. Lens.—The lens is convex posteriorly, and almost—due to its anterior surface being flattened—plano-convex in shape ; it is distinctly cellular, with well-marked nuclei scattered irregu- larly in section. On either side it thins out to join the walls of the posterior part, in which, at the line of union, a specially deep circular ring of pigment is deposited. Retina.—The rods (R) are well marked and embedded in deep pigment. In the line of the optic axis is a bundle of specially elongated ones (R') ; externally they are in contact with spherical elements (n!), which are as usual of, roughly speaking, the same size as the nuclei of the lens cells. These elements, together with the external ends of the rods, appear to be surrounded by a molecular layer of punctated material, clearly distinguishable, but yet not so well marked as in Varanus giganteus. Most externally is a layer of cone- shaped bodies (Co.), the internal ends of which taper off into processes connecting them either with the spherical elements PINEAL BYE IN LACERTILIA. 197 or with the rods. Their flattened bases rest upon the connec- tive-tissue investment of the eye. At its posterior extremity enters the pineal stalk. The appearance of this in one form examined is given in fig. 23, where it had the form of a simple nervous strand, much as in Hatteria, the specialised rods running down into it, though there was no group of nucleated bodies to be seen at their external ends. Draco volans. The eye is present in Draco volans, though the specimens examined did not make it possible to investigate the structure in detail, the vesicle walls having apparently shrunk and come to lie close together, so as to obliterate the internal cavity. The whole is in a condition, as far as could be ascertained, which resembles that seen in- Chameleo or Lyriocephalus. The vesicle is ovoid in shape, and placed with its long axis in the median line of the head within the parietal foramen ; its walls are composed of cells with very distinct nuclei, but no further differentiation to form retina or lens could be distin- guished, and the vesicle itself was remarkable for the absence of pigment in its walls, a feature already noticed in Chameleo and Lyriocephalus. The only pigment present lay in the dura mater, and surrounded the very posterior extremity of the vesicle in the position in which the pineal stalk would enter, though it was not possible to determine the existence of this. Externally specimens of Draco differed somewhat in their indication of the organ, its position being in most cases easily determined by the presence of a specially modified scale in the usual position, and bearing a cornea-like space. Ceratophora aspera. The organ is indicated externally in the usual manner by a scale modified to form acornea. Thestructure of the epiphysis is interesting, being unlike that met with before. In the specimen examined, though the external indication was present, the parietal foramen was seen, when sections through the head 198 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. were cut, to be closed. Its position is indicated by a large blood-vessel which branches on the internal surface of the skull as it enters the bone exactly as the vessel accompanying the pineal stalk branches on entering the parietal foramen, the two branches thus formed pass through to the external surface. The parietal foramen appears simply to have closed up, the blood-vessel remaining and piercing the bone. In many forms such as Leiolemus the optic vesicle is placed quite on the internal side of the foramen; in such a form as this were the bone to grow and close up the foramen the vesicle would be left on the internal surface ; this is exactly what appears to have taken place in Ceratophora aspera. The epiphysis has the usual form, being well developed and con- sisting of a proximal portion at right angles to the roof of the thalamencephalon, whilst, from the further end, the distal portion runs forward along the under surface of the dura mater as the pineal stalk until it ends in a slightly swollen portion immediately beneath the parietal foramen. This corresponds to the optic vesicle of other forms ; in structure it appears to be solid and to consist of rounded elements, resembling very closely those present and figured by de Graaf in Rana esculenta. There is this important difference, however, between Amphi- bia and Lacertilia, that in the former the distal portion of the epiphysis becomes completely cut off from the proximal and is placed externally to the skull, whilst in Lacertilia, on the other hand, the distal part not only remains in connection with the proximal but is permanently closed within the skull cavity after closure of the parietal foramen. Lyriocephalus scutatus. The usual external indication is present though not so pro- minent as in many other forms, the scale being somewhat smaller than those by which it is enclosed posteriorly, which form a v-shaped ridge behind it, the point of the v being di- rected backward ; on the scale a circular, slightly raised, trans- parent part is modified to form a cornea. Internally the structure of the optic vesicle resembles more PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 199 that of Chameleo than any other, there being no differentia- tion of the walls to form a lens and retina. The shape of the vesicle is, however, unlike that of Chameleo, being elongated dorso-ventrally. Its walls consist of nucleated columnar cells, and are thicker anteriorly than posteriorly, where there is present a small amount of pigment on the external surface of the cells. The whole structure lies in the parietal foramen, and has the form, viewed as a solid object, of a small ovoid body whose anterior end is closely apposed to the connective-tissue, forming a roof to the parietal foramen, between which and the cuticle no pigment is present. The pineal stalk is a prominent struc- ture, entering the posterior end of the vesicle where it unites with the cells; unfortunately, in the specimen examined the part with the optic vesicle and portion of the pineal stalk attached to it was torn away from the underlying structures, but their can be little doubt from the similarity between this form and such as Chameleo, that the stalk simply passes back to join the proximal portion of the epiphysis, the upper part of which is seen running forward in the dura mater directly towards the optic vesicle. Calotes, Pl. XV, figs. 13 and 14; Pl. XVIII, figs. 31 and S03 Pl. XX fig: 8; In smaller species of Calotes the external indication of the eye is most clear. A large median scale is so modified (fig. 13) as to present precisely the appearance of an eye. In its centre is a circular black space, within which lies a white ring enclosing a dark space resembling exactly the pupil. This effect is produced by reason of the central part of the scale being transparent and slightly raised into a dome-shaped cornea, while beneath it lies the pineal eye which, on removal of the scale, is seen to have a globular form. The external surface is covered with a glistening white substance, save anteriorly, where the transparent lens is placed; the internal cavity is lined by the rods embedded in deep pigment, and hence appears in- tensely dark when seen through the lens, the whole eye having 200 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. thus the appearance, viewed from above, of a white rim sur- rounding a dark circular space, and lying immediately beneath the scale, is easily visible on the dorsal surface of the head. Calotes ophiomaca and C. versicola.—In both these species the external indication is very clear, the modified scale with its corneal, central part forming a prominent object on the surface of the head : internally the structure is practically the same in both forms, and the description which follows is that of the first mentioned of the two species. Position of the Eye.—The organ is considerably smaller than the foramen in which it lies, and is enclosed in connective tissue ; the inner fibres of the cutis vera are so arranged as to form a dome-shaped structure above the eye (Ct.*) whilst there is the usual marked absence of pigment between the latter and the external surface, which is also dome-shaped. The cells of the rete mucosum are noticeably elongated and columnar im- mediately above the eye (R.M.). Structure.—The whole organ is considerably compressed, in the dorso-ventral line, its longest axis (Pl. XVIII, fig. 33) lying in the same line with that of the head. Lens.—The lens is distinctly cellular though the nuclei of the component cells are not clearly visible (fig. 33, Le.) as in other form such as Seps (fig. 32). The structure is concavo- convex in shape, its anterior surface being convex outwards, whilst certain of the cells on the inner side have become pig- mented (pig.) and thereby assumed a striking similarity to the rods. Retina.—The rods (R.) are very well developed, facing into the cavity of the optic vesicle; from their external ends pro- minently marked processes pass to an outer layer of cone-shaped bodies (Co.), the broad bases of which le upon the external limiting structure of the eye. There is an absence of any spherical elements such as are seen in other forms. As before said, no nuclei can be recognised in the lens, and the failure to detect both may very probably be due to the fact that the specimen was not in a very good state of histological preserva- tion rather than to their being absent. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 201 In connection with the eye a large blood-vessel (B. v.) is developed which runs up by the side of the epiphysial process to the foramen. Epiphysis.—The eye is, as far as could be told, completely separated off from the brain; the proximal part of the epi- physis runs, as usual, at right angles to the dorsal surface of the brain, whilst the median part corresponding to the pineal stalk of other forms runs forward from the former along the upper surface of the cranial cavity, ending blindly before the foramen is reached (fig. 31, Hp'., Op. s.). Agama hispida, Pl. XIX, fig. 39. The external indication of the eye is very clear in this form, consisting, in a specially large scale placed medianly on the head posteriorly to the paired eyes, in a slight depression and surrounded by small tubercle-like scales. A raised white rim encloses a circular space marked by a curious hour-glass shaped, dark looking patch. Sections show that the organ lies within the parietal fora- men and is almost spherical in shape ; above it the connective tissue of the cutis vera is modified as in other forms (e.g. Varanus bengalensis), and is entirely free from pigment, the cells of the rete mucosum being also somewhat elongated above the eye; the latter is surrounded immediately by vacuo- late tissue as in Cyclodus or Anolis (figs. 18 and 24). It is difficult to determine the structure of the eye owing to the fact that not only the rods, which are long and well marked, but also the external part of the retina is deeply pigmented ; it appears as if nearly all the elements lying external to the rods had degenerated into pigment-bearing cells, amongst which at intervals spherical elements corresponding to those of other forms can with difficulty be distinguished. In many cases processes, also pigmented, pass from the rods to the pig- ment masses lying external to them. The lens is distinctly cellular and forms the transparent anterior boundary to the optic vesicle, though as the walls of the latter are comparatively thick the cavity is small; even in 202 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. some of the cells of the lens pigment is deposited. It is difficult to determine whether the organ is or is not yet con- nected with the proximal part of the epiphysis, owing to the great development of pigment in the dura mater surrounding the upper part of the epiphysis, and leading from this to the eye; it was not possible to say definitely whether in the specimen examined this did or did not contain a process from the proximal part of the epiphysis. Grammatophora barbata. The scale modified to act as a cornea is present and promi- nent on the surface of the head. The eye is present beneath and has apparently (having been only examined as a solid object) the form of a bulb, very similar indeed to that already described in Calotes ; in fact, the figures of this as a solid object (fig. 14) would serve also for that of Grammatophora. Externally the bulb is covered with a glistening white substance, whilst internally it is lined by deep pigment in which the rods are embedded. Above the eye, which does not appear to be connected with the epiphysial stalk, pigment is, as usual, entirely wanting in the skin. Moloch horridus, Pl. XIX, fig. 36. External Appearance.—In the specimen examined the external indication was very well marked, consisting of a cir- cular dark space, surrounded again at a short distance by a dark circular line, and lying upon a small smooth space in the median line dorsally amongst the stiff horn-like processes covering the head. Position of Eye.—Longitudinal sections at once showed (Pl. XIX, fig. 36) that this space corresponded roughly in extent to that of the parietal foramen, and that within this and close beneath the surface lay the eye. Unfortunately like many others this specimen was in too bad a state of pre- servation to do more than enable me to ascertain with certainty the presence and general outline of the organ. It is remarkable for its spherical shape, deep pigment, and com- PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 203 parative size. These points are indicated in fig. 36 where the eye is drawn as a solid object. It will be seen that it lies close beneath the surface, the skin being here completely devoid of pigment and quite smooth, forming in fact a cornea (Cor.). As far as could be ascertained, though the point could not be determined with certainty owing to the state of preser- vation of the specimen, the eye is connected, as represented diagrammatically with the proximal part of the epiphysis by the solid pineal stalk (Op. s. ?). Leiodera nitida, Pl. XVII, fig. 22; Pl. XIX, fig. 38. External Appearance.—The specialised scale (Pl. XIX, fig. 38) forms a prominent feature in the median dorsal line of the head, bearing in its centre a small dome-shaped structure perfectly white, and hence standing out in clear contrast to the deeply-pigmented scale, of which it is a_ specialised portion. Position of the Eye.—The organ lies closely embedded in connective tissue, and not really filling up the parietal foramen, than which it is considerably smaller. The layers of the skin above it are so modified as to form the external dome- shaped structure already noticed, whilst pigment is markedly absent from this part, though present on either side (fig. 22, Ct. pig.). A very striking feature in section is the peculiar elongation of the cells of the rete mucosum (R. M.), whose in- ternal ends appear in many cases to be prolonged downwards, each cell being so placed that its long axis is at right angles to the surface at that particular spot. The connective tissue, further, very closely invests the eye, whilst no such well- developed blood-vessel is to be recognised as is met with in most Cases. Structure.—The organ has a very definite shape shown in fig. 22, being depressed dorso-ventrally, as a result of which the cavity of the vesicle is very small. Lens.—The lens is well developed, and, as usual, cellular, the nuclei of its cells being prominent in section, and so arranged that they form in the main a line from side to side. VOL, XXVII, PART 2.—NEW SER. P 204 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. It is thickest in the line of the optic axis, and thins off to each side, where it joins the retina. The lens is, in fact, doubly convex, its anterior surface being in close contact with the investing connective tissue, and parallel to the surface of the dome-shaped cornea above. Retina.—The retina, owing to the compression of the eye, may be likened in shape to the walls of an oblong box, the lid of which is formed by the lens. The rods line the internal surface, and are very clearly marked ; none appear to be espe- cially elongated ; their external ends are in connection with a layer of spherical-shaped elements (n'), as in other forms these elements being also of the same size as the nuclei of the lens. Most externally lie a layer of cone-shaped bodies (Co.), whose inner ends taper off into processes passing to the spherical or rod elements, whilst their broad bases lie upon the external limiting membrane of the eye. Epiphysis.—The eye appears to be completely separated off from the proximal part of the epiphysis, which consists of (1) a proximal part with walls of distinctly nucleated cells, which extends vertically from the thalamencephalon to the roof of the brain cavity ; and (2) of a solid thin part running for- ward along the brain roof from the proximal part towards, but not reaching as far as, the parietal foramen; it is enveloped in pigment, and, being very thin, is somewhat difficult to trace. Anguis fragilis, Pl. XVII, fig. 25. This form has been described and figured in detail by de Graaf,! but in certain important points I am unable to agree with him. Fig. 25 represents, somewhat diagrammatically, a longitu- dinal vertical section through the foramen, the eye, and the epiphysis. The eye in the specimen figured was considerably smaller than the foramen, and the epiphysis was remarkable for running forward until very close to the eye, whilst its distal rounded extremity was invested by pigment cells (Ep. pig.). 1 Op. cit., pl. 4, fig. 34. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 205 As described by de Graaf, the eye is separated off from the epiphysis. In his figure the lens is shown completely separated off from the retina, which overlaps it anteriorly. This does not appear to be the case; but, on the contrary, the eye, as far as could be told, agreed with all other forms examined in having the lens directly continuous with the posterior walls of the vesicle.! The most important point of difference, however, is concerned with the retina. De Graaf figures this (Pl. 4, fig. 34) as having a layer of unpigmented rods (s/.)—his “ Staafjeslaag”— together with a layer of unpigmented cells (cep.)—his “ Cyilin- dercellenlaag”—lying internal to the pigmented rods. Of neither of these two layers can I succeed in finding any trace, either in Anguis fragilis, or in any of the forms yet examined. In every instance all that can be discerned within the rods is merely the remains of what may be supposed to have been during life the fluid contents of the vesicle. In coagu- lating this does in some instances appear to attach itself to the parts of the rods facing into the cavity, but never forms, in any specimen examined hitherto, any structures so definite as to be interpreted into the “ Staafjeslaag” or “ Cyllindercellenlaag” of de Graaf. Cyclodus gigas, Pl. XV, fig. 9; Pl. XVI, figs. 18, 19, and 20); Pl XVITT; figs 29); Plt XX, fig? 5. In Cyclodus the epiphysis is not developed into an eye, but the structure is nevertheless in an interesting state, showing most probably a stage passed through during the development of the eye in other forms. External Appearance.—lIn fig. 9 is represented a portion of the scale specially modified in connection with the organ. It lies, as in all other forms, in the median line posterior to 1 In my first communication to ‘ Nature,’ the lens of Hatteria was described as separated from the retina, but examination of a fresh specimen showed at once this was a result due to slight post-mortem degeneration of the tissues, and that in reality the two were perfectly continuous, a result which subse. quent investigations of many forms has fully confirmed, 206 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. the paired eyes, and is easily discernible in the living animal, one of which I was enabled to examine. It consists of a dark patch, having again the appearance of a membrane stretched tensely over a cavity, surrounded by an irregular, slightly- raised, white border, represented in the figure, in which is drawn only the central part of the scale. Thus the modification to form a ‘ cornea” is, as reference to the figure will show, in a rudimentary state, and foreshadows the similarly rudimentary condition of the organ beneath. In fig. 29 is represented a solid side view of the brain, showing the position of the pineal gland; it lies enclosed in the brain membranes, and fitting closely into the parietal foramen, out of which it is easily removed along with the dura mater. The epiphysis is very long, and stretches far forward beyond the roof of the thalamencephalon, almost to the anterior extremity of the cerebral hemispheres, its distal extremity being deeply embedded in pigment in the dura mater, and having the appearance, as in fig. 29, of a dark, swollen mass. In section it is seen that the epiphysis is hollow throughout its whole course, the cavity being in direct communication with the third ventricle; the cells composing its walls are all columnar in nature and distinctly nucleated, cilia also being easily distinguished in most parts. The whole may be divided into two parts: (1) a proximal portion, stretching from the roof of the thalamencephalon in the form of a tube to the parietal foramen ; and (2) a swollen distal extremity lying in the latter, and closely invested by vacuolate tissue. In other words, the epiphysis in Cyclodus has the form of a vesicle attached to the brain by a hollow stalk. The vesicle may be regarded as homologous with the eye of other lizards in a rudimentary state,! and the hollow connecting process with the solid pineal stalk and proximal part of the epiphysis of such a form as Hatteria. In figs. 19 and 20 is represented, on a larger scale, the structure of the anterior and posterior walls of the vesicle (by the anterior wall is meant that nearest the external surface). 1 It may also be closely compared with the condition in adult Hlasmobranchs. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 207 In both, the cells are seen to be much elongated with very dis- tinct nuclei; in the case of the anterior ones, save for the presence of well-marked cilia, they differ but little from those of a lens. An elongation of those lying in the middle would, in fact, transform this into the lens of such a form as Lacerta ocellata (Pl. XVIII, fig. 30). Passing to the posterior surface, however, a curious but interesting modification takes place (cf. figs. 19 and 20), the nuclei all pass to the external surface, whilst the ends of the cells, which are left facing into the cavity of the vesicle, bear a close resemblance to the rod- like structures of the retina of other forms. It is possible that we have here a stage in the development of the retina. The internal portion of the cell forms the “vod,” the nucleus passes to the external end, and with the protoplasm lying around it forms the spherical-shaped element of the retina, still retaining its connection with the rod. Other cells, lying on the opposite side (supposing the wall of the vesicle, as in Cyclodus, to be more than one cell thick), become transformed into the external-lying elements of the retina, their protoplasm becoming in part drawn out into pro- cesses, which enter into connection with those of other cells, in part remaining around the nuclei, forming thus the external spherical elements and the processes connecting these with each other. This development would give exactly such a structure as has been already described in Varanus giganteus. In this form it is noticeable that the spherical elements of the retina consist of nuclei with a small amount of protoplasm around them, the nuclei being identical in size with those of the lens, the greater part of the protoplasm of the cells seeming to be developed into processes connecting the various elements. By this means is developed a network of branched cells, con- nected on the one hand with rods, and on the other with nerve- fibres. In Cyclodus the stage is reached and retained in which the rods have begun to be formed by a removal of the nuclei to the outer ends of the cells, where they form, together with 208 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. those of the external-lying cells, a prominent layer (figs. 18 and 20, n.). Lacerta. Two species of this genus have been examined. (1) Lacerta viridis, Pl. XVII, fig. 26. In this form the external indication, though recognisable, is not at all prominent, consisting merely in a dark circular space upon a median scale. The organ lies immediately beneath this within the foramen ; it is flattened out dorso-ventrally and embedded in deep pig- ment, as represented in fig. 26, where it is drawn as a solid object. Its smallness and the great deposition of pigment rendered it very difficult to examine the structure in detail, and the backward extension of the pigment towards the epi- physis made it also difficult to distinguish any pineal stalk, though in parts there were indications of its existence (Hp. 7) ; this pigment may, however, be a deposition in the brain mem- branes which must once have surrounded the stalk connecting the vesicle with the epiphysis, and which persist after the separation of the two has taken place. (2) Lacerta ocellata, Pl. XVIII, figs. 27, 28, and 30. In this the external indication of the organ is far more con- spicuous than in L. viridis; the scale with its dark central circular space, surrounded by a slightly raised light-coloured rim, forming a well-marked feature on the dorsal surface of the head. Position of the Eye.—This differs somewhat from that of other forms inasmuch as it lies closer to the external surface ; the connective tissue in which it lies completely fills up the foramen, and when the brain, together with its membranes, are pulled away internally from the skull, the eye is brought away with them (Pl. XVIII, fig. 28). The position within the foramen is represented in fig. 27, where the eye is drawn as a solid object surrounded by a great number of branched pig- ment cells. The foramen is supposed to be cut in half longitu- dinally and vertically, one side being removed to show the PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 209 eye; the connective tissue enclosing it being omitted for the sake of clearness. Structure.—In shape the eye resembles more than any- thing else a hemisphere, the equatorial plane being occupied by the lens, which is, in shape, almost concavo-convex, its outer, anterior surface being flattened. The bulb is encased closely by the connective tissue of the dura mater (D. M.), a thin layer passing in front of the lens, whilst all the posterior surface is surrounded by,branched pigment cells (pig.*). Lens.—The lens has the usual cellular structure, being thinnest round the margin where it is continuous with the retina; the nuclei of its component cells form a well-marked layer running across it in section from side to side. Retina.— Within the retina a considerable deposition of pigment in various parts indicates, to a certain extent, degen- eracy, and at the same time renders the examination of its structure difficult. The rods (R) are well marked, and in places present the appearance of being striated. Two bundles of rods are slightly elongated (R'), being in connection with two distinct nervous strands entering the retina posteriorly. External to the rods lie spherical nucleated elements arranged in two layers, an inner (v!) and an outer (n”), whilst amongst them much pigment is scattered in small granules, rendering their detec- tion difficult; in parts still larger masses of pigment are present, which may perhaps be due to the degeneracy of the spherical elements into pigment-bearing cells. Epiphysis.—As before said, two distinct nervous strands may be seen entering the retina posteriorly and close together (ne), one being larger than the other; back from these two, which soon unite, may be traced a single nervous strand which it is extremely difficult to follow, owing to its close investment by connective tissue of the dura mater, but which J believe runs downwards and backwards until it joins the proximal part of the epiphysis (p.), which is considerably swollen and has a curious development of pigment in its walls. | Along with the pineal stalk runs the usual blood-vessel, 210 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. which on nearing the eye bulb breaks up into numerous branches which ramify (figs. 27 and 30, B. v.) amongst the pigment cells encasing the eye. Zootoca vivipara. The presence and structure of the eye in this form has been described to a certain extent by Leydig, though he failed to recognise its connection with the epiphysis, and did not apply to it the name of eye. The presence of deep pigment in the specimen examined makes it impossible to describe in detail the structure of the retina. Pigment is also thickly deposited in the skin, but it is seen in section to end abruptly on each side of the parietal foramen; so thick is the layer of pigment that no light, save for this provision, could possibly reach the pineal eye. The eye has the usual form of a hollow vesicle with the lens anteriorly, lying immediately beneath the specialised scale. Pigment runs from the proximal part of the epiphysis to the eye, but, as far as could be told, the latter is separated from the brain. The eye is present in early stages, before any definite indi- cation of the parietals can be distinguished ; in an embryo whose head measured 6 mm. in length, the eye is a prominent object on the dorsal surface of the head, immediately beneath the skin. It is flattened in the dorso-ventral line so that the cavity is small; anteriorly the lens is differentiated and its cells are perfectly continuous with those of the vesicle behind, which are being transformed into the retinal elements, though the fine pigment granules already deposited throughout their substance (and absent from those of the lens) render it dif- ficult to distinguish the different elements; facing into the vesicle, however, the rods can be seen around which the pig- ment granules are thickest; external to these lie spherical elements massed closely together and not yet separated into definite layers. These may very probably be regarded as the nuclei of the cells whose internal parts are becoming trans- formed into rods. The eye appears to be connected with the PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 211 proximal portion of the epiphysis by a fibrous strand, such as is represented by De Graaf as connecting the distal with the proximal portion of the epiphysis in Bufo cinerea. Seps chalcidica, Pl. XVIII, fig. 32; Pl. XX, fig. 5. External Appearance.—The external modification is not so evident in this form as in some others. If one of the median scales posterior to the paired eyes on the dorsal surface of the head be examined it will be found to have upon it a dark-coloured oval patch (hence distinguishable from the yellow-brown surface of the scale) ; this, which has the charac- teristic appearance of a membrane stretched over a space beneath, indicates the position of the eye lying beneath it. Position of the Eye.—The eye lies somewhat on the inner side of the foramen (Pl. XVIII, fig. 32), there being as usual no pigment between it and the external surface. It is remark- able in being the only one in the forms yet examined, which is larger than the foramen ; its relation to this is shown in the figure, where it is seen that the parietal bones overlap it on each side to a small extent; if by any reason the foramen became closed then the eye would be situated intracranially, whilst in Amphibia the position is always extracranial, when the distal vesicle of the epiphysis becomes, as in Anura, separated off from the proximal. The eye is surrounded immediately by a great development of pigment bearing tissue which fills up what part of the foramen is not occupied by the organ itself. Structure.—The whole eye is, in longitudinal vertical section, seen to be elliptical in shape, the long axis correspond- ing in position with that of the head and hence forming a strong contrast to such an eye as that of Anolis (Pl. XVIII, fig. 24). Lens.—The lens is distinctly cellular, the nuclei of the constituent cells forming a line prominent in section across from side to side, slightly nearer to the inner than to the outer surface; the whole is doubly convex in shape, thickest in the line of the optic axis, and thinnest where it is continuous with the retina. Retina.—The specimen not being in very good order histo- ZrZ W. BALDWIN SPENCER. logically, the structure of the retina could not be determined with any great amount of accuracy. The rods as usual formed the most prominent feature; at their external ends in certain parts spherical elements could be distinguished (n!), whilst, most externally, elements corresponding doubtless to the cone-shaped ones of other eyes were present (Co.). In many parts external to the rods masses of pigment (pig.”), indicating doubtless degeneracy in the tissues of the retina, were present. Connection with the brain.—The eye is apparently completely separated off from the brain, no pineal stalk being recognisable. General Account of the Structure in Lacertilia. The above account reveals the epiphysis within the group Lacertilia as a structure of very varied development, in some forms presenting merely the appearance of a hollow process from the roof of the thalamencephalon, in others being modified into a well-marked eye, whilst between these two extremes various intermediate forms are found. In taking a short general review of the results detailed above we may deal with them under the four following heads : (1) General Formof the Epiphysis.'—The simplest form seen isin Platydactylus, where it has merely the structure of a hollow outgrowth running at right angles to the surface of the thalamencephalon until it reaches the dura mater lining the cranial cavity. In Hatteria, on the other hand, we have a form in which specialisation is carried to its furthest extent, with the result that the epiphysis becomes modified into three parts—(1) a proximal part, still hollow, and connected with the brain roof, (2) a median, solid pineal stalk, serving to connect the former with (3) the distal portion differentiated into an optic organ. These forms may be taken as two extremes, the gap between which is filled up by various modifications : thus in Cyclodus the epi- physis instead of running straight upwards turns forwards, and at the distal end swells out into a vesicle whose walls show a trace 1 Compare the diagram showing the development of the epiphysis in various forms on Pl. XX. PINEAL EYE IN LAOERTILIA. 2138 of differentiation into lens anteriorly and retina posteriorly ; the hollow connection with the brain persisting through life. In such forms again as Calotes, Seps, or Leiodera the same differentiation into an optic organ with retinal elements takes place as in Hatteria, but the connection with the brain is lost. In a few forms further, such as Chameleo vulgaris and Lyriocephalus scutatus, the development of the epi- physis is carried to a great extent, resulting in a division into three parts, as in Hatteria, but the distal vesicle is not differentiated into an eye, its walls retaining their primitive structure. In Varanus giganteus a peculiar modification takes place, seen in no other form examined ; the pineal stalk, which is well developed, breaking up into three divisions before the eye is reached, whilst in V. bengalensis the eye is apparently separated from the proximal portion of the epi- physis, and the part equivalent to the pineal stalk of the other species is hollow and ends beneath the optic vesicle in a slight swelling. (2) State of Retinal Elements.—Dealing with the state of development of the retinal elements, the eyes are found to differ to no little extent in this respect; thus in Hatteria it is better developed than in any other form examined: im Varanus, on the other hand, while the elements can be dis- tinguished the whole eye is marked by a great deposition of pigment ; even in the centre of the lens a large globular mass is present which must effectually prevent the entrance of light to the vesicle in the line of the optic axis, whilst, in addition to this, many of the retinal elements degenerate into pigment- bearing cells. In others, such as Anolis, almost all the elements are enveloped in pigment, whilst in others,as Agama hispida, so great is the deposition that it is not possible to distinguish any elements save the rods. In contrast to this we find in some genera, such as Chameleo and Lyriocephalus that no pigment is present at all, and, accompanying this absence of pigment, it is found that the vesicle is not developed into an eye, its walls retaining their 214 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. primitive structure of columnar cells, ciliated in- ternally. In Cyclodus again we find another modification present, the epiphysis having apparently reached a stage passed through in the development of the eye of other Lacertilia; a vesicle is formed distally, but the pineal stalk remains widely open, very little pigment is present amongst the cells, and no true eye is found. In Ceratophora, lastly, the distal extremity of the epiphysis is placed within the cranial cavity beneath the spot, corresponding in position to the parietal foramen of other forms; the portion equivalent to the optic vesicle is present, forming a slightly swollen mass at the distal extremity of the pineal stalk (?), consisting of rounded elements very similar to those present in the extracranial part of the epiphysis of Bufo cinerea. (3) External Modification.— When we come to deal with the external modification it is very remarkable to notice that a high development in this is by no means necessarily accom- panied by, or the index of, a highly-developed sense-organ beneath. In Varanus giganteus the external indication is extremely well marked, whilst the eye beneath is also well developed, and connected with the pineal stalk ; in Hatteria, on the other hand, the eye is still better developed, the retinal elements being more clearly differentiated, whilst there is quite absent that great development of pigment which must indicate to a certain extent degeneracy in the eye of Varanus. Despite this there isin Hatteria no external modification, or, at all events, only a very slight one present indicating the position of the eye beneath ; the latter also lies deeply embedded in connec- tive tissue—deeper still than in the case of Varanus—though, as in every other form, there is a marked absence of pigment between the eye and the surface of the head. Thus, in the one of these two forms in which the organ is most highly de- veloped, we find that the external modification is much the least evident. If, again, such genera as Calotes, Seps, Leiodera, and Anolis be taken, in these the modified scale is so prominent as to form the most noticeable feature on the dorsal surface of the head, and to resemble a cornea; below it PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 215 the eye is in a more or less highly developed state, its elements often obscured by deposition of pigment, but revealing in all cases, even when best developed, its rudimentary nature by the absence of any nervous connection with the brain. (4) Position of the Eye.—With regard to the position of the eye considerable variation is seen. In such forms as Calotes, Leiodera, Anolis, or Agama, for example, the eye is close beneath the external surface, lying in the upper part of the well-marked parietal foramen. In Varanus the eye lies somewhat deeper, whilst in Hatteria it is placed deeper still on the inner side of the foramen, and in both forms a great development of connective tissue takes place, the latter being in every instance arranged in a definite manner. In Lacerta ocellata and Cyclodus the eye is placed within the parietal foramen, fitting it closely, the foramen having the form (see Pl. XVIII, fig. 27) of a truncated cone, whose apex hes externally. In Ceratophora aspera finally, the parietal foramen is closed, and the modified distal portion of the epi- physis hes quite within the skull cavity. The connective-tissue encasements of the eye also show some variations. In Hat- teria is seen the highest development in this respect, the eye lying in a definite capsule, and having special supporting fibres stretching across to it from the walls in the anterior part. In Varanus the arrangement of the connective-tissue fibres appear to indicate the fact that a capsule formerly enclosing the eye, as in Hatteria, has become filled up with fibres, so that the eye is now immovably fixed. In other forms, again, such as Cyclodus, Anolis, or Anguis, it lies surrounded by vacuolate tissue, whilst in others, as Chameleo, Lacerta ocellata, Leiodera, Monitor, Uraniscodon, Calotes, and various other genera, the connective tissue, without any trace of capsule, closely invests the eye, no space being left within the parietal foramen. If now we take typical examples from amongst the Lacertilia, and consider the state of development in each with regard to the above four points, it is seen that no one form shows a high 216 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. state in all, some being well developed in one and some in another respect, but each being degenerate in at least one of the four features. Referring to the latter under the numbers (1), (2), (3), and (4), and taking first Hatteria, we find that it shows in (1) and (2) a high, in (3) a low, and in (4) a somewhat low state. Varanus giganteus shows in (]) a high, in (2) a con- siderably degenerate, in (3) a high, and in (4) a somewhat low state. Calotes shows in (1) a degenerate (i.e. connection with brain lost), in (2) a somewhat degenerate, in (3) a very high, and in (4:) a high state of development. Chameleo vulgaris shows in (1) a high, in (2) a low, in (3) a fairly high, and in (4) a somewhat low state. The same result exactly is obtained when each form is tested in the same way, showing that the organ is never present in a perfectly functional state, but always presents some one feature, at least, in which it is more or less imperfect. We are thus brought to the conclusion that the pineal eye in Lacertilia is a rudimentary structure—that at the present time it is not so highly developed as it must have been at some previous period when fully functional. It is, indeed, difficult to ascertain whether the structure is now functional at all. In lizards, whose paired eyes are closed, no result is obtained by rapidly focussing a strong beam of light on to the modified eye scale, and thus on to the pineal eye; in fact, strong light suddenly focussed into one of the paired eyes merely causes the lid to be drawn down without any further apparent result, whilst in the pineal eye there is no protecting lid, and no movement whatever takes place to remove the eye from the direction in which the light is coming. Wiedersheim has, since the greater part of this paper was written and the preliminary communication to the Royal Society published, attempted to show that the organ is func- tional and not rudimentary ; he bases his conclusions upon the study of several forms such as Varanus, in which, as pre- PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 217 viously described by myself, a most noticeable feature is the absence of pigment between the eye and the exterior. This is certainly very clearly marked and, further, is perfectly constant ; but there can be no doubt, in face of the descriptions given above, that, if we use the term “rudimentary organs” to include such as are now from change in their structure less capable of fulfilling their function than they have been at some previous time, then within this category must certainly be included the pineal eye of Lacertilia. Such features as the great development of pigment in, for example, Varanus, or the loss of connection with the brain in many, such as Calotes, are surely only capable of explanation on the suppo- sition that the organ is rudimentary. One of the most prominent features in connection with the organ is its Invertebrate structure. This was pointed out by de Graaf in Angius fragilis, but in none of the forms examined have any structures equivalent to the rod-like bodies placed internally to those embedded in deep pigment, described and figured by him as present in the above-men- tioned species, been found. There is often, however, a struc- tureless substance resembling a coagulum present within the vesicle, which doubtless represents the remains of a humour which was fluid during life; in certain cases it appears to have attached itself to the inner ends of the rods and thus simulates to a certain extent elements lying internal to and connected with them. Further, there seems to be but little ground for likening the eye to that of Cephalopods and Pteropods, as is done by de Graaf; the structure of the retina is different, and that of the lens essentially so, being formed as a cuticular se- cretion in Mollusca, whilst in Lacertilia it is distinctly cellular and formed directly from the cells of the neural canal. As before! pointed out the development and structure ot this organ is extremely interesting, as showing that out of the walls of a vesicle originating as a hollow out- growth from the neural canal, may be formed an optic 1 “Nature,” May, 1886. 218 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. organ of the Invertebrate type, whilst from the walls of a precisely similar vesicle, and within the same animal, may be formed an eye of the Vertebrate ty pe. In both cases the nerve-fibres enter into connection with the retinal elements lying on the side remote from the rods ; in one case, however, important secondary developments take place which are wanting in the other, and to which are further entirely due the differences existing between the two types of eyes. In the case of the pineal eye, first, we have a vesicle, the anterior portion of the walls of which are transformed into the lens ; of the cells forming the walls of the posterior half, those facing into the cavity give rise to the rods, whilst external to these are formed the other retinal elements, into connection with which enter the fibres of the pineal stalk ; the primary optic vesicle persists, and there is thus formed an eye on what is usually spoken of as “ the Invertebrate type,” i.e. the rods facing directly into the cavity of the vesicle, and the nerve entering into connection with the external lying elements. In the case of the paired eye, however, we find that, whilst up to a certain point it agrees in development precisely with the pineal eye, after that point is reached secondary struc- tures appear which have an important influence on its final form. The retinal elements are formed out of the cells of the vesicle wall; the lens, however, is not, but arises as an invagi- nation which pushes before it the external wall; whilst there is this difference between the lenses of the two forms, we see at once, when dealing with the retinal elements, that they are formed in a similar position to that in which they are present in the pineal eye—that is, the cells facing into the optic vesicle give rise to the rod-elements, whilst the external lying cells give rise to what are really the outer layers of the retina (nuclear and molecular layers, &c.). It is simply the formation of the lens as an invagination which causes the rods to assume what appears to be an external position, but is external only when regarded in connection with a secondarily PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 219 formed cavity, the primary optic cavity which persists in the pineal eye entirely disappearing in the paired eyes. There is, however, this difference, that in the pineal eye the posterior portion of the vesicle wall forms the retina, in the paired eyes the anterior; the lens of the pineal eye being a structure totally distinct from that of the paired eyes. In the pineal eye both light transmitting and light receiving structures are formed out of the walls of the neural canal; the absence of this in the paired eye does not perhaps constitute so great a difference as appears at first sight, for though the lens is not formed out of the neural wall it is formed out of epiblast cells exactly as this is, and in such forms as the Amphibia, where the epiblast is divided into two layers, nervous and epidermic, then the lens is formed solely by the cells of the nervous layer. In both cases, finally, the nerve-fibres are in connection with the external lying elements and retain this connection throughout life, to do which, after invagination has taken place in the paired eyes, they must pierce the walls of the secondary vesicle; there is thus produced the phenomenon of the nerve-fibres spreading out “in front of” (as it is called), and internal to, the retinal elements, though, morphologically speaking, they are behind and external to them, exactly as in the pineal eye. Significance of the Organ. In all forms of Vertebrates the epiphysis arises at an early stage as a hollow outgrowth from the roof of the thalamen- cephalon. Goette stated that the epiphysis was identical in posi- tion with the anterior neuropore—the part at which the walls of the neural canal remained longest in connection with the epiblast —but there seems to be no doubt whatever that this is not the case and that the rudiment of the epiphysis is formed at an early period in a position some little way posterior to that of the an- terior neuropore. There can thus be no connection between the persistent anterior neuropore of Amphioxus and the epi- physis of other animals, supposing the former to be equivalent to the neuropore of remaining Chordata, which cannot be VOL. XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER. Q 220 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. regarded as perfectly certain when its relationship to the anterior end of the notochord is considered. In Petromyzon, according to Ahlborn,' the epiphysis arises as a hollow outgrowth from the roof of the thalamen- cephalon, which in subsequent development becomes divided into three parts, (a) a proximal solid stalk, (b) two distal vesi- cles of which the larger is the uppermost, whilst the smaller acquires a secondary connection with the left ganglion habe- nulz. The whole lies within the cartilages enclosing the brain, and though a certain rod-like appearance is subsequently pro- duced in the cells, particularly those of the upper vesicle, still no pigment is developed and no differentiation into retina or lens takes place. In Elasmobranchs? the epiphysis stretches forward as a hollow outgrowth with a dilated end, which may remain within the skull cavity or be enclosed in the cartilage of the roof. In Amphibia’ the same development takes place in early stages, the organ remaining in Urodeles as a mushroom-shaped structure, whilst in Anura it is differentiated into a vesicle distally and a solid fibrous stalk proximally, the former being afterwards cut off and occupying an extracranial position im- mediately beneath the skin. In Reptilia it arises in all forms as a hollow, forwardly directed outgrowth, which becomes most highly differentiated in Lacertilia, where, in many forms, its distal vesicular por- tion forms an optic organ. In Aves the structure also stretches forward, originating as a hollow outgrowth, and being subsequently divided into a distal part which becomes vascular and a proximal solid stalk. In Mammalia, finally, the structure.is much less developed, the process being shorter than in the lower forms and directed backwards. 1 « Untersuchungen iiber das Gehirn der Petromyzon,” ‘ Zeit. f. Wiss.,’ Bd. xxxix, p. 230, Tf. 13 and 16. 2 Balfour, ‘ Elasm. Fishes,’ p. 17. 3 Henri de Graaf, op. cit., p. 23 (Urodeles) and p. 27 (Anura). PINEAL BYE IN LACERTILIA. 7p | Taking thus the animal kingdom as a whole, we see that the epiphysis presents in all forms below mammals the following two points in common with regard to its structure. (1) It originates as a hollow vesicular outgrowth stretching forward from the roof of the thalamencephalon. (2) It becomes divided during development into two main divisions. (a) A distal vesicle. (6) A stalk (hollow or solid) connecting (a) with the brain roof. In Mammalia the first of these two points obtains (except that the structure stretches backwards instead of forwards), but degeneration of the tissues sets in at an early period and secretion of solid material takes place in the part corresponding to the hollow vesicle of other forms. In Aves both points obtain, but in course of development the distal vesicle becomes solid and highly vascular. Below Aves it apparently remains vesicular throughout life save in the Anura where the distal division separates off, becomes solid, and lies extracranially. So far as is known to us at present the distal portion becomes most highly modified in Lacertilia ; further investigations into its structure in other groups is needed, but, as far as our present knowledge goes, we are justified in saying that in Lacertilia alone, amongst living forms, the distal part of the epiphysis is modified into an eye and the tissues between it and the external surface are modified so as to allow of the easy transmission of rays of light to the organ. In Petromyzon certainly the structure of the organ as figured by Ahlborn resembles somewhat an eye, but closer ex- amination reveals considerable differences between it and the eye of any Lacertilian. (1) Its division into two vesicles, one above the other, is a point of some importance, indicating that in this case develop- ment takes place along another line from that pursued in Lacertilia, where the vesicle always remains single. (2) The absence of true retinal elements or lens is remark- Doe, W. BALDWIN SPENCER. able. At first sight Ahlborn’s figures of the organ, especially of the walls of the upper vesicle, call to mind the rod elements of other forms, but a closer examination again reveals important points of difference; they do not, as in Lacertilia, face into the cavity, being bounded internally as well as externally by nervous matter, and, more important still, there is an entire absence of pigment, which is the prominent feature possessed in common by the rods ofall Lacertilian eyes. Further, again, the cavity of the optic vesicle is traversed by strands of nervous matter passing from the anterior to the posterior wall, a feature entirely wanting in any pineal eye, however degenerate, amongst Lacertilia. On the other hand, these rod-like structures occupy the hinder wall of the vesicle, the proper position, supposing them to be true but degenerate retinal elements; and it may be remembered that amongst Lacertilia, which must be regarded as descended from ancestors possessed of pineal eyes, we do know of one form (Cyclodus) in which the eye now stops at a stage of development in which the cells of the posterior wall much resemble those of Petromyzon, and are devoid of pigment. The absence of lens also is paralleled in the case of Cyclodus. (3) The organ is completely enclosed within the cartilaginous cranium, and acquires a secondary connection with the brain (its lower vesicle fusing with the left ganglion habenule) which is quite unknown amongst any Lacertilian. The conclusion to be drawn from ‘these facts! is that at the present time the epiphysis of Petromyzon certainly does not become modified into a pineal eye at all comparable to that of 1 For our knowledge of the structure of the epiphysis of Petromyzon we must rely on Ahlborn’s description here quoted ; it is, of course, possible that, viewed in the light of recent work, the structures described by him might be found to bear another interpretation. I have not at present been able to study the structure, but would suggest the possibility of what Ahlborn figures as nervous material lying internal to the rod-like structures, and as strands of tissue crossing from the anterior to the posterior wall of the vesicle, being in reality only the coagulated remains of the fluid contents of the vesicle. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 923 Lacertilia, in which its double nature and secondary fusion with the brain are quite unparalleled. At the same time it is of course possible, though we have no direct evidence of the fact, that the epiphysis is in a rudimentary state, and may be the degenerate representative of a once well-developed pineal eye. The general structure of the organ—a distal vesicular part with a solid proximal stalk—being in favour of this view, as is also the resemblance—upon which, however, too much stress must not be laid, between the walls of the upper vesicle and those of the swollen extremity of the epiphysis in Cyclodus. Further investigations into the structure of the epiphysis are much needed amongst Pisces. At present it is known that amongst Elasmobranchs the structure developes as a hollow outgrowth from the roof of the thalamencephalon. This, as figured by Balfour in Scyllium,! stretches forward right over the cerebral hemisphere, and comes finally to consist of (1) a swollen distal extremity, and (2) a hollow stalk connecting (1) with the brain roof. The swollen extremity may further remain, as in Raja, external to the cranium, or become embedded within the cartilage,asin Acanthias. There is thus a striking similarity between this and the epiphysis at a certain stage of development in Lacertilia and the final stage persistent in Cyclodus. When, however, we come to the Amphibia we find that amongst these the epiphysis passes through precisely the same forms in development, but (1) remains very rudimentary indeed in Urodela, and (2) after reaching a considerably higher stage of development in Anura undergoes great degeneration. The structure in the latter becomes differentiated into a distal vesicle, connected by a solid pineal stalk with the brain; the stalk soon, however, disappears, and the distal portion lies com- pletely separated extracranially, its constituent cells undergoing degeneration. Never at any period does it become developed in any living Amphibian into an eye. The word living is used and emphasised, because it is by no means certain that the same remark can be applied to all ' «Comp. Embryology,’ vol. ii, p. 355. 224 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. the extensive group of extinct forms classed together as Labyrinthodonta, and usually regarded as the extinct repre- sentatives of the class Amphibia. On the contrary, one of the most interesting features in the cranial skeleton of these is the possession of an extremely well-marked and prominent parietal foramen,! which is proportionately quite as large, and in many cases larger, in comparison to the size of the skull than in living Lacertilia. There is no doubt that the presence of a parietal foramen is intimately associated witha high state of development of the epiphysis, and we are thus brought without hesitation to the conclusion that, whilst amongst living Amphibians the epiphysis is present only in a rudimentary and degenerate condition, in extinct Amphibia (Labyrintho- donta) the epiphysis was in a high state of spe- cialisation. Further, the only group of living animals in which, as before said, a parietal foramen is present, is Lacer- tilia. Within this group, though various degenerate forms are seen, yet, inasmuch as The organ is found in genera of every family, ancient and recent alike (in Hatteria, in Calotes, in Agama, in Moloch, in Anolis, in Iguana, in Anguis, in Varanus, in Seps, in Lacerta), in which a foramen is developed ; whilst again, in such as Gecko, Ameiva, and Ceratophora, where uo foramen persists, the organ is absent, It may be further said that the presence of a parietal foramen, as a structure typical of the skulls of a group of animals indicates the presence of a pineal eye within that group. It is quite true that in three forms described—Cyclodus, Chameleo, and Lyriocephalus—the foramen is present, and though the epiphysis is, in certain respects, highly deve- loped in each case, the distal portion retaining its connection with the brain roof, yet no true eye is formed. This, however, need present no difficulty in the way of acceptance of the above statement. Regarding the present families of Lacer- 1 See especially the drawings of Fritsch in‘ Fauna der Gaskoble und der Kalkstein,’ Prag., 1885. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 225) tilia as descendants of some common ancestor, we can come to no other conclusion, inasmuch as the more primitive and specialised forms agree at the present time in the possession of a parietal foramen occupied by a pineal eye, and that this is, further, a characteristic of the nearest allies of the forms mentioned, than that the ancestral form possessed both these structures, and that the condition seen in Chameleo, Cy- clodus, and Lyriocephalus is not typical but secondary ; they possess a parietal foramen simply because their ancestors possessed a pineal eye, which in them is in a rudimentary con- dition, as indeed the external modification in Cyclodus (Pl. XV, fig. 9) seems to show in the case of this form in particular. | When, therefore, we find the parietal foramen exceedingly well developed throughout all the group Labyrinthodonta, we are justified in concluding that in them a pineal eye was in all probability present, even though we may grant the possibility (an unlikely one under the circumstances) of its occasional presence, as in Lacertilia, in a low state of development. In living Reptilia the presence of the foramen is confined to one group, but amongst the extinct forms, which may be regarded as the ancestors of the Reptilia now living, whilst some, at all events, may further be regarded as intimately connected with the ancestors of living birds, we find that the foramen is a well-developed structure. Judging from its present condition in the relatively small Lacertilia of the present day, we may imagine that in the huge extinct forms of Mesozoic periods—in such as Ichthyosaurus and Plesio- saurus, the walls of whose foramina even present rugosities as if for the insertion of muscles—the pineal eye attained a development and importance quite disproportionate to that with which we are now acquainted in any living form. 1 T am indebted to Professor Moseley for calling my attention to the paper upon “ The Brain of a Theromorphous Reptile of the Permian Epoch,” by Cope, in which is figured a cast of the brain of one of the Diadectide. Perhaps the most remarkable feature is the huge comparative size of the cavity within 226 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. The walls of the foramina are lifted above the level of the parietal bones, and it is perfectly possible, if not certain, that the organ itself, enclosed in the eye capsule, projected con- siderably beyond the surface. With the gradual extinction of these forms and of the Deinosauria (i. e. Iguanodon, &c.), after the Cretaceous period was passed, the organ, we may suppose, began with the rapidly dwindling size of the specialised tertiary and later Reptilia and Aves to lose its importance, until, degenerating in various de- grees in different groups, it retained traces of its original eye-like structure in the only groups in which, amongst living reptiles, the parietal foramen persists ; its preservation being intimately connected with and dependent upon the presence of this struc- ture. The foramen is preserved amongst no group whatever of existing Aves, and hence in these the epiphysis undergoes considerable degeneration, though in its development it still reaches a stage when, asin Reptilia, it consists of a distal vesicle connected with the brain roof by a solid stalk. In Mammalia the degeneration is far more complete, and all trace of the ancestral importance is completely lost. There now remains for consideration the two classes, Uro- chorda and Cephalochorda; with regard to the latter it is very difficult, if not impossible, to homologise any part of its nervous system with the epiphysis of higher forms; the per- sistent anterior neuropore described by Hatscheck may perhaps be homologous with that of other forms of Chordata which closes during development, though even this must be regarded as extremely doubtful owing to its position considerably posterior to the anterior end of the notochord ; neither can it for the same region be considered the homologue of the epi- physis, which again lies posterior to the neuropore. The azygos pigment spot described as an “eye” has no apparent the parietal foramen, presumably filled during life by the epiphysis. In addi- tion to this, Professor Cope points out a large posterior process leading “back towards the optic lobes and roof of the thalamencephalon, and which recent work on living forms can scarcely leave room to doubt represents the flattened pineal stalk. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 227 resemblance in position or structure to the pineal eye of Lacertilia. As figured by Langerhans! and Niisslin,? it is a pigment spot within the walls of the neural canal, and lies anterior to the part shown subsequently by Hatschek to be the anterior neuropore ; whereas if it were the homologue of the azygos eye of Tunicata it must lie posteriorly to this. Turning to the Urochorda a structure is at once met with which naturally suggests comparison with the pineal eye. Yet, however tempting it may be to homologise the azygos Tunicate eye with the latter, it cannot be too clearly pointed out that the two organs differ fundamentally in structure and position, and we have not the slightest reason for supposing that the pineal eye is the direct repre- sentative of the Tunicate eye. In the first place, the internal position of the latter clearly distinguishes it from the pineal eye; even supposing the tunicate organ to, in some way, undergo evagination there still remains the difficulty that the retina cor- responds in position to the part which after evagination would give rise to the lens, whilst the latter structure is perfectly distinct in nature and formation from that of the pineal eye. The curious formation of the lens in Tunicates from the union of two or more separate parts, differing in shape and quite distinct from that of Lacertilia in their relationship to the retina, is an important point of difference, and renders it quite impossible, whatever may be the case with the retina, to homo- logise the lens in the two forms. At the same time there is considerable analogy between the two lenses, inasmuch as each is formed directly out of the walls of the neural canal, a point in which they at once agree with one another, and differ from every other Vertebrate. Notwithstanding this it must, I think, be admitted that the vesicular nature of the eye in Lacertilia and the formation of the lens out of a portion of the vesicle, constitutes a difference of fundamental importance between the two eyes in their fully-developed condition. 1 « Arch. f. Mikr. Anat.,’ Bd. xii, Tf. 12, fig. 17. 2 «Zur Kritik des Amphioxusauges,’ Otto Nisslin, Tubingen, 1877. 228 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. Whilst it must be admitted that we are without evidence sufficient to warrant us in regarding the pineal as the direct representative of the azygos Tunicate eye, it is, perhaps, worth suggesting that there may be some connection between the larval eye of Tunicata and the epiphysis of higher forms. It may be pointed out, first of all, that the position of the eye and that of the rudiment of the epiphysis is the same with regard to the anterior end of the notochord, both, further, being situated on the dorsal surface of the “ brain,” applying this term to the anterior vesicle of the neural canal in Tunicata. It must, however, be also noticed that the eye of the latter is placed not exactly medianly, but slightly to the right side! There still remains the great difficulty of the transformation of the internally placed eye into an external hollow process of the brain roof. According to Kowalewsky,’ the Tunicate eye first appears as a thickening of the dorsal wall of the brain cavity, in one particular portion the cells becoming cylin- drical and much elongated, and pigment appearing at theirinternalends. The refractive structures forming the lens are produced subsequently, so that at first the eye is merely a specially thickened part of the roof of the brain cavity, and only at a later period appears to assume its dis- tinctly internal position, bulging out into the cavity (ef. figs. 32, 34). Turning now to the epiphysis, we find that it arises as a hollow outgrowth from the brain roof, presenting, as a rule, nothing comparable to the structure of the Tunicate eye. In one form, however, amongst Amphibia, it is just possible that we meet with an indication of a connection existing be- tween the two. A further examination in other forms, par- ticularly those of Pisces, might possibly reveal a similar 1 Ahlborn draws attention to the slightly asymmetrical position of the epiphysis in Petromyzon, where it becomes, by secondary growth, united to the left ganglion habenule ; but since the eye of Tunicates is on the right side, it is difficult to imagine any connection between the two. 2 ‘Arch. f. Mikr. Anat.,’ Bd. vii, 1871, pl. xii, figs. 32 and 34. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 229 method of development; at any rate, without laying undue stress upon the example to be quoted, it is worth while drawing attention to it, inasmuch as it reveals to us the possible path by which the epiphysis of higher forms has been developed out of a structure similar to the larval Tunicate eye at an early stage. De Graaf, in his recent memoir,' figures and describes the development of the epiphysis in Bufo cinerea. His figures are, unfortunately, not drawn with such regard to his- tological detail as could be desired in the present instance, but, so far as they go, they indicate the possible existence of a con- nection between the epiphysis of Bufo and the azygos eye of the embryo Tunicate. He shows the epiphysis as arising at first as a thickening of the roof of the thalamence- phalon, which soon assumes the form of a slight hollow outgrowth. Onthe inner surface of the cells, sharing in the thickening and subsequent outgrowth, isa small but well-defined mass of pigment. This pig- ment very soon entirely disappears, and a hollow process—the epiphysis—is formed, which gradually increases in size, and becomes differentiated into a vesicular distal portion and a solid stalk, the former gradually becoming constricted off. Is it not possible that in these phenomena we have an indication of the change from the internally situated Tunicate eye into an externally placed hollow process? As before said, the Tunicate eye arises as a distinct thickening of the brain-roof, the cells forming the thickened portion bearing pigment on their in- ternal ends. Just the same phenomena are witnessed in the case of the epiphysis of Bufo cinerea, but, instead of develop- ing into an eye internally placed, the cells, whose external ends already form a bulging on the outer surface, form into a well-defined evagination, the internally placed pigment dis- appears, and the epiphysis, as present in all the higher groups of the Chordata, is developed. Whether we are here presented with an epitome of the steps passed through during transformation of the internally-placed eye of a transparent organism into the externally-lying evagina- 1 Op. cit., pl. iii, figs. 22 and 23, p. 27. 230 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. tion of a creature whose skin has become opaque, and to whom an eye within the brain has become useless, it would be ex- tremely difficult to say with certainty;! it is, however, worth while calling attention to the fact that the epiphysis in very early stages in its development in Bufo cinerea resembles the Tunicate eye before the appearance of refractive elements, whilst subsequent loss of pigment and evagination transforms it into the epiphysis of the adult. If there be any truth in the above hypothesis it follows that we must start with a form which may be regarded as the common ancestor of present Tunicata and the higher Chor- data; in this, which closely resembles an embryonic Tunicate, certain cells of the dorsal wall of the neural cavity are specially elongated and bear pigment at their internal ends, just as in the embryo Tunicate eye and Anuran epiphysis. From this point development leads in two directions—(1) to the highly developed internal eye of present Tunicata with its secondarily developed refractive structures, and (2) by evagination and loss of pigment to the epiphysis of higher Chordata. Subsequent differentiation in the latter results in the formation of a distal vesicle united to the brain roof by a stalk, at first hollow and afterwards solid, whilst finally the distal vesicle becomes modified into the pineal eye. The evolution of the epiphysisis represented diagrammatically 1 Tt will be seen that this differs from the suggestion of Professor Lankester that the internal eye of Tunicates by evagination forms the Vertebrate eye. In the first place I suppose the evagination to give rise to the epiphysis, subsequent differentiation of the distal vesicle of which gives origin to the pineal eye. Secondly, I assume the development of the Tunicate eye and the epiphysis out of an ancestral form common to Tunicata and the higher Chordata, development taking place along two different lines and being possibly connected with the transparency of the one and the opacity of the other form. At the same time it may be pointed out that it is possible that the paired eyes may be formed by evagination of paired internal eyes similar to the one which becomes transformed into the epiphysis. The vesicles giving rise to the paired and pineal eyes are precisely similar to each other, and may have originated in the same way, the two types of eyes being aoe the result of the es of secondary structures. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. Folk in the figures on Pl. XX, which show the various stages passed through before the highest form of development is reached, and also the various forms as the result of degeneration. Each stage save the earliest ones (1, 2, and 3) which are found in the development of Tunicata and Bufo cinerea, represent the permanent condition of the epiphysis in some living form. The question now arises, is it possible to determine at what period or rather within what group of animals the distal vesicle first became differentiated into a pineal eye. There must clearly have been a period during which the hollow epiphysial evagination was not functioning as an eye, precisely in the same way in which the primary optic vesicles must have existed as hollow outgrowths of the brain before they, in like manner, were differentiated into optic organs ; in fact, the three distinct stages of (1), a hollow bladder-like evagination (fig. 4) ; of (2), a distal vesicle connected by a hollow stalk (fig. 5) to the brain ; of (3), a vesicle connected with a solid stalk (fig. 6), must necessarily all have intervened before the final stage (fig. 7) wasreached. When in any particular form we find one of these three stages are we to assume that in that given form, and hence in the closely allied members of the same group, the epiphysis has never in its philogenetic history reached a higher stage of development than the one in which it is now present ? Suppose, for example, that we find an animal in which the epiphysis has the form represented in fig. 5, must we take it for granted that in that animal and its ancestors no higher stage of differentiation has ever been reached. Taking the animals in which this particular stage is permanent, we find that they include certain Elasmobranchs together with Cyclodus gigas amongst Lacertilia. Now we have clear evidence that, in the forms from which we must suppose Cyclodus in common with all other lizards to be descended, as well as in its nearest living allies, the epiphysis is developed into a pineal eye. To what conclusion must we come in the case of Elasmobranchs; certainly the non-development of a pineal eye in living examples is no proof whatever that such a structure was not present in its ancestors. It must at once 252 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. be granted that an Elasmobranch, such as Raja or Acan- thias, differs from Cyclodus inasmuch as none of its living allies have the organ more highly developed, whilst in forms allied to Cyclodus it isin a high state of development; yet even this is by no means of so great importance, as to make us conclude that living forms present us with the highest stage yet reached in Elasmobranchs. If we turn to the Am- phibia we finda group of animals amongst whom in no living form is there a pineal eye present, and yet we may feel per- fectly sure that in the great group of extinct Amphibia (Labyrinthodonta) one was not only present but most probably developed to its highest pomt. It must be admitted that we have at present no direct evidence of the existence of pineal eye within the group Pisces : until our knowledge is far greater with regard to the development of the structure in, more especially Dipnoi and Ganoidei, it will be impossible to determine the question of the presence or absence of the structure within the group. Meanwhile, the varied state of development seen in such forms as Petromyzon on the one hand, and Acanthias, Raja, and Scyllium on the other, may perhaps be taken as evidence tending in favour of the view that in its present form the organ is rudimentary. All that may now be rightly insisted upon is that the absence of the eye in living forms, either of this or of any other class, is no proof that one has not been present at some period in the phylogenetic history of the group. The conclusions, finally, to which we are brought are the following : (1) Our present knowledge is not great enough to allow us, in Amphioxus, to homologise any structure either with the Tunicate azygos eye or with the epiphysis. (2) The epiphysis of higher Chordata is the homo- logue of the larval Tunicate eye. (3) The pineal eye is produced as a secondary differentiation of the distal part of the epiphysis. PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 233 (4) There is not sufficient evidence to prove or disprove the existence of the organ within the group Pisces; it was present in extinct Amphibia, and is found amongst living forms only in Lacertilia. (5) In all forms at present existing it is in a rudimentary state, and though its structure is better developed in some than in others, it is per- fectly functional in none. (6) It was present most highly developed in (1) Extinct Amphibia (Labyrinthodonta), and (2) The large group of extinct forms (as Ich- thyosaurus, Plesiosaurus, Iguanodon, &c.) which may be regarded as ancestors alike of living Reptilia and Aves. (7) The pineal eye may probably be most rightly considered, as peculiarly a sense organ of pre-Ter- tiary periods. 234 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. EXPLANATION OF PLATES XIV, XV, XVI, XVII, XVIII, XIX, & XX, Illustrating Mr. Baldwin Spencer’s Paper on “ The Presence and Structure of the Pineal Eye in Lacertilia.” List of Reference Letters. Ant. (Le). Cells of anterior wall of distal vesicle of epiphysis. C. Cilia of cells lining epiphysis. Ca. Capsule of connective tissue enclosing the pineal eye. Car. Cartilage within skull in Hatteria. Cd. Cerebellum. C. H. Cere- bral hemispheres. Co, Cone-shaped bodies of pineal eye. Co. Modified cone-shaped bodies lying near the pineal stalk. Cor. Cornea. C¢#., Ct.!, Ct.2, Ct3, Ct.4, Ct.°, Ct. Connective tissue in various positions in connection with the parietal foramen and pineal eye. Ct. pig. Pigment in the cutis vera. Cut. Cuticle. De. Dermis. D. M. Dura mater. Hp. Hpidermis. Lp., Ep.! Epiphysis. Zp. 1. Swollen distal end of epiphysis. £p.! (ops.) Portion of epiphysis equivalent to the pineal stalk. Hum. Humour of eye. Inf. Infun- dibulum. Ze. Lens. Md. Medulla oblongata. Mes. Mesencephalon. Mo. Molecular layer of eye. WV. Nuclei of cells of epiphysis walls. V.}, 2.1 In- ternal row of nuclei in retina. .?, V.? External row of nuclei in retina. n> Specialised nucleated elements in pineal stalk of Hatteria. ze. Nerve- fibres. WV. ct. Nuclei of connective tissue. O// Olfactory nerve. Op., Op. v. Optic vesicle. Op. S. Pineal stalk. Op. L. Optic lobe of brain. Pa. for. Parietal foramen. Pa., Par. Parietal bones. Post. (R.) Cells of posterior wall of swollen end of epiphysis in Cyclodus. pig., pig.', pig.?, pig.3, pig.t Pigment developed in various positions in connection with the eye. Proc. Processes uniting various retinal elements in Varanus. Ae. Retina of pineal eye. &.,7. Rods of retina. £.! Specialised rods in connection with entrance of nerve-fibres. &. Mp. Rete mucosum. SS. Spindle-shaped elements of retina. hl., Th. 3rd vent. Thalamencephalon and 3rd ventricle. Vent.3 3rd ventricle. PLATE XIV. Fic. 1.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of Varanus giganteus. The right side lies posteriorly, the left anteriorly, and the parietal bone enclosing the foramen is shaded yellow. The connective tissue is seen forming a dome to the foramen and filling up the latter. The pineal eye is cut through in the median line, showing the lens with its special development of pigment in the optic axis and the retina with the elongated rods where the nerves enter the vesicle. The nerves are three in number, two PINEAL EYE IN LACERTILIA. 235 joining into one and the two main strands then uniting to form the solid pineal stalk. The large blood-vessel accompanying the stalk enters the foramen, together with the latter. Fic. 2.—Longitudinal vertical section through the connective tissue capsule containing the pineal eye of Hatteria punctata. The right side is the anterior, the left the posterior, the external surface of the head being parallel to the breadth of the plate. The capsule is formed anteriorly by the con- nective tissue filling up the parietal foramen. Into the capsule passes a blood-vessel, which ramifies amongst loosely scattered connective-tissue fibres. The anterior part of the capsule is comparatively empty, but special fibres pass from the walls to the sides of the lens. The optic vesicle is cut through in the median line, showing the cone-shaped lens and the elements of the retina together with the pineal stalk entering posteriorly. Fic. 3.—Section through the retina of Hatteria punctata. The left is the internal, the right the external surface. Internally the shade indicates the fluid within the vesicle, bounding the cavity of which are the rods lying in pigment. External to the rods lie the inner spherical-shaped elements, then the molecular layer, and external to the latter larger spherical bodies together with conical and spindle-shaped bodies, the latter two being in con- nection with nerve-fibres. (In the figure the nerve-layer has been drawn so as to appear more prominent than it is in reality.) Fig. 4.—Section through the portion where the pineal stalk enters the walls of the vesicle. The specialised bundle of rods lying in the optic axis, with the nuclei in connection with them, are seen together with the retinal elements around the entrance of the nerve-fibres of the stalk. The fibres run round in front of the capsular-like structure which contains the specialised nucleated elements, sending some to these on either side, the remainder passing on and either (1) entering into connection with the elements nearest to the pineal stalk, or (2) passing farther on to form a layer of nerve-fibres on the external surface of the vesicle. Fig. 5.—Separated rods from the retina of the pineal eye of Hatteria punctata. The pigment is so deposited as to produce the effect of striations. Kic. 6.—Section through the retina of Varanus giganteus. The rods lie embedded in pigment on the internal surface, passing into the cavity of the vesicle; the shade on the left indicates the humour within the latter. The reticular nature of the retina external to the rods is seen, the nuclei of the spherical elements being coloured red. The internal spherical elements are situated within the molecular layer; amongst the external ones are large masses of pigment; more external still is a thin layer of nerve-fibres, and outside this the connective-tissue fibres enclosing the optic vesicle. VOL. XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER. K 236 W. BALDWIN SPENCER. PLATE XV. Fic, 7.—Longitudinal vertical section through the median line of the head in Hatteria punctata in the region of the parietal foramen. ‘The relative positions of the epiphysis, the pineal stalk, and pineal eye, are seen together with the plug of connective tissue filling up the foramen. In front of the epiphysis is the vascular roof of the thalamencephalon. Fic. 8.—Diagrammatic side view of the brain of Hatteria punctata. The brain is lying in its cartilaginous case. From the thalamencephalon between the cerebral hemispheres and the optic lobes arises the epiphysis, which at first running almost directly upward, turns forwards on reaching the cartilaginous roof as far as the parietal foramen, where the pineal stalk pierces the cartilage and enters the optic vesicle, which is seen lying in its capsule. Fic. 9.—External view of the modified eye-scale of Cyclodus, showing the modification to form a cornea. Fic. 10.—External view of the scales in the median line of the head of Varanus giganteus, showing the scale modified as a cornea. Fic. 11.—The pineal eye of Anolis (sp.?) removed, together with the brain membranes, and viewed as a solid object by transmitted light. Fic. 12.—The pineal eye of a small specimen of Varanus bengalensis, ying within the parietal foramen and viewed from the under surface. Fic. 13.—The modified eye-scale of a small Calotes (sp. ?), with the trans- parent cornea in the middle through which the eye is seen. Fic. 14.—The pineal eye of the same Calotes, whose scale is figured in Fig. 13, removed with the dura mater and viewed as a solid object. Fie. 15.—Scales from median line on head of a large specimen of Iguana tuberculata, showing the modified eye-scale with cornea. Fic. 16.—Modified eye-scale of a young Iguana, showing the transparent central portion with the eye beneath as a dark spot. PLATE XVI. Fie. 17.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of Varanus bengalensis, showing the pineal eve and the hollow epiphysial stalk immediately beneath. The yellow shade indicates bone. p.! Hollow epiphysial stalk. Fie. 18.—J.ongitudinal vertical section through the distal part of the epiphysis of Cyclodus, showing the swollen extremity and the hollow epi- physial stalk connecting this with the brain. Zp. 1. Swollen extremity, Ep. Epiphysial stalk, PINEAL EYE IN LACEHRTILIA. 237 Fic. 19.—Section through a part of the upper wall of the swollen extremity of the epiphysis in Cyclodus. @. Cilia of cells bounding the cavity of the epiphysis. Aut. (Le) The elongate cells, equivalent to those forming the lens of the parietal eye in other forms. . Oval nuclei of the cells. Ftc. 20.—Section through portion of the under wall of the same. Post. (2.) Ends of the cells facing into the cavity in the position of the rods of other forms. . Circular nuclei of the cells. Fie, 21.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of Chameleo vulgaris, showing the optic vesicle, pineal stalk, and epiphysis. The yellow shade indicates the parietal bone. PLATE XVII. Fie. 22.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen and pineal eye of Leiodera nitida. The great elongation of the cells of the rete mucosum is drawn, and the entire absence of pigment from the cutis vera above the eye indicated. Fig. 23.—Pineal eye of Iguana tuberculata, cut in section and re- moved from the parietal foramen. When in position the optic axis looks directly upwards. Fic. 24.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of Anolis (sp.?), showing the pineal eye lying within the vacuolate tissue, to- gether with the pineal stalk. Fic. 25.—Longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of Anguis fragilis, showing the pineal eye separated from the proximal portion of the epiphysis and the forward extension of the latter. Fic. 26.—The eye of Lacerta viridis, viewed as a solid object lying within the parietal foramen. PLATE XVIII. Fic. 27.—The pineal eye of Lacerta ocellata, viewed as a solid object lying within the parietal foramen, one half of which has beencut away. The eye lies within a mass of branched pigment cells, amongst which ramify the branches of the blood-vessel which accompanies the pineal stalk. Fic. 28.—The brain of Lacerta ocellata, with the pineal eye lying in the dura mater, viewed from the side. Fie. 29.—The brain of Cyclodus gigas, viewed from the side, with the epiphysis stretching forwards and upwards and ending in a swollen part within the parietal foramen surrounded by pigment. (The foramen should not be closed above.) 238 W. BALDWIN SPENCER, Fic. 30.—Longitudinal vertical section through the pineal eye of Lacerta ocellata, showing the double nature of the nerve. Fic. 31.—Diagrammatic longitudinal vertical section through the brain of Calotes ophiomaca, to show the pineal eye lying within the parietal foramen and its relationship to the epiphysis, and of this to the brain. Fig. 32.—Longitudinal vertical section through the pineal eye of Seps chalcidica, showing its relationship to the foramen and its surrounding of deep pigment. Fic. 33.—Longitudinal vertical section through the pineal eye of Calotes ophiomaca, showing its meltionsp to the parietal foramen and the blood- vessel within the latter. PLATE XIX. Fic. 34.—Diagrammatic longitudinal vertical section through the parietal foramen of Varanus giganteus, showing the eye within the parietal fora- men and the pineal stalk. Fig. 35.—Diagrammatic longitudinal vertical section through the median line of the brain of Plica umbra, to show the eye and its relationship to the pineal stalk and epiphysis. Fig. 36.—Diagrammatic side view of the brain and pineal eye of Moloch horridus, viewed as a solid object, the eye lying within the parietal foramen. Fic. 37.—Modified median eye-scale of a small Varanus bengalensis. Fic. 38.—Modified median eye-scale of Leiodera nitida. Fre. 39.—Modified median eye-scale of Agama hispida. Fic. 40.—Diagrammatic longitudinal vertical section through the brain of Chameleo vulgaris, to show the distal vesicle with the pineal stalk. Fic. 41,—Diagrammatic longitudinal vertical section through the brain of Varanus bengalensis, showing the eye lying in the parietal foramen, and the pineal stalk with its swollen extremity beneath the eye. PLATE XX. Diagram illustrating the development of the epiphysis from an internally placed eye in the “brain” of an ancestor common to Tunicata and higher Chordata. Figs. 1—7 illustrate the evolution of the organ till its highest stage of development is reached. Figs. 2 and 3 are diagrammatised from those of two stages in the development of the epiphysis in Bufo cinerea, as given by de Graaf. Fig. 1 represents an early stage of development, accord- ing to Kowalevsky, in Tunicates, before the formation of a lens. In higher Chordata loss of pigment and evagination produce the epiphysis, which may in various forms reach different stages shown in the figures. The cross-line shading indicates the parietal bone. Figs. 9—12 representing various stages of degeneration in forms in which the parietal foramen becomes closed. Alk the figures are, of course, perfectly diagrammatical. ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 239 On the Life-History of Pedicellina. By Sidney F. Harmer, B.A., B.Sc., Fellow of King’s College, Cambridge, and of University College, London. With Plates XXI aud XXII. Durine the summer of 1885, spent in Rocquaine Bay, Guernsey, I succeeded in obtaining material for the study of the metamorphosis of Pedicellina echinata, a form which occurs in great abundance (in Rocquaine Bay) on Coralline growing under the shade of other seaweeds in tide-pools. The larve of Pedicellina invariably refused to fix them- selves when kept in a small quantity of water, and I therefore ultimately adopted the following method for procuring the various stages necessary for the investigation. Adult colonies were placed, after the removal of all super- fluous parts of the Coralline on which they were growing, in a small vessel, the mouth of which was closed by a piece of linen. The vessel was then left for a day or more in a tide-pool, after which a careful search (with the aid of a low power) over the Coralline was generally rewarded by the discovery of several young Pedicellina, which had resulted from larve hatched in the tide-pool, and which, owing to their inability to escape from the vessel in which they were confined, had been obliged to fix on the Coralline. After preservation with corrosive sublimate and decalcification of the Alga, sections were easily prepared. In this manner, I succeeded in obtaining numerous individuals of various ages, fixed under perfectly normal con- ditions. 240 SIDNEY F. HARMER. My study of the metamorphosis of Pedicellina has led me in the main to a complete confirmation of the account already given by Barrois (No. 3), and summarized on pp. 312 and 313 of my previous paper on Loxosoma (No. 4), where I have ventured on a criticism of Barrois’ conclusions which I do not find to be justified by my own investigation of the subject. In opposition to my previous opinion, I must now conclude that the post-larval changes consist in a remarkable metamor- phosis, and that the first bud is formed after the primary individual has acquired its adult characters. Barrois has published no figures illustrative of his statements, the actual details of the process being difficult to understand from his very short description, whilst the morphological nature of the changes remains entirely obscure. The subject appears to me, therefore, to deserve further consideration. The structure of the larva is well known from the researches of Hatschek,' and it will be unnecessary to describe it in more than a few of its details. In the swimming attitude of the larva, the ciliated ring is everted to the exterior, whilst from the oral face project two prominent structures ;—the epistome, with its tuft of long cilia, and the anal cone, on which opens the anus. During the re- tracted condition, however, the ciliated ring is reflected to the interior of the large vestibular cavity, whose outer walls are formed by the fold of skin which bears the ciliated ring itself (cf. Pl. XXI, fig. 1). The floor of the vestibule is constituted by the ventral or oral surface of the larva, being specially de- pressed between the base of the epistome and the anal cone, and at the sides of the latter. As Barrois has correctly stated, fixation takes place by the oral surface, the larva being meanwhile in its ‘‘retracted” condi- tion. Pl. XXI, fig. 1, a median longitudinal section, will serve to illustrate the method of fixation. It will be noticed that the long axis of the stomach is approximately parallel to the surface of attachment. 1 Vide the summary of Hatschek’s results in Balfour, ‘ Comp. Emb..,’ vol. i, pp. 242—246. ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 241 Fig. 3 represents a horizontal section of a larva not long after its fixation: the occurrence of brain (= “ dorsal organ,” v. No. 4), cesophagus, and rectum in the figure sufficiently de- fines the level of the section. The epistome is cut in the region of its greatest thickness, whilst at the summit of the anal cone is seen the depression into which opens the anus. By comparing this with fig. 1, it will be observed that the anus has already altered its position, since it is now directed some- what forwards, the rectum being more nearly parallel to the stomach than before. The cells of the vestibular epithelium are very high at the sides of the anal cone, and are character- ized by the special readiness with which they take up colouring matters. Fig. 5 represents a horizontal section through the apices of the epistome and anal cone of another individual of the same age. The epistome is here seen to be continuous, at each side, with a fold of vestibular epithelium; epistome and folds together forming (as seen in this section) a horseshoe-shaped ridge partially embracing the sides of the anal cone, in which region the two lateral folds become evanescent. The result of this arrangement is the formation of a somewhat deep ciliated groove (0.g.) running round the greater part of the vestibule, and passing in front into the transversely elongated, funnel- shaped mouth. Posteriorly, however, owing to the disappear- ance of the lateral folds, the oral grooves fade away at the sides of the anus, where vestibule and oral grooves conse- quently appear continuous in such a section as that represented in fig. 5. The relations of these structures will become more clear on reference to fig. 4, a larva somewhat older than those previously described, the section passing transversely through the region of the anal cone, in the plane a B in fig. 1. At the sides of the anal cone are the two lateral portions of the vesti- bule (J. v.), these structures being separated from the oral grooves by the folds already mentioned. Inthe more anterior sections of the series, the lateral folds become continuous with the epistome, and the oral grooves with the mouth. Further back, on the contrary, the folds become lower, and finally dis- 242 SIDNEY F. HARMEK. appear, so that the oral grooves are not distinguishable in the post-anal region of the vestibule. The above description, together with a reference to fig. 5, will thus show that the deep post-anal groove (m.v.) of fig. 1 is continuous equally with the oral grooves and with the general vestibular cavity. For further clearness, dotted lines in the same figure indicate the position and relations of the right lateral fold as it would appear by looking at the wall of the vestibule from the inside of the latter. The relations of half of the ciliated ring and of the right oral groove are also shown in the figure. . Fig. 2 represents a longitudinal section of a recently-fixed larva, passing in the direction of the line cp in figs. 3 and 4. One of the lateral folds, owing to its projection inwards into the vestibule, separates the latter into two portions, containing respectively the mouth (and oral groove) and part of the epis- tome. The latter portion obviously corresponds to one of the lateral regions of the vestibule (/. v.) in fig. 3. Fig. 2 further explains the continuity of the tip of the epistome with the lateral folds (cf. figs. 1 and 5). In more median sections of the same series the latter are not seen, the epistome being per- fectly free at its apex, whilst the separation of the vestibular cavity into two parts is not apparent. A considerable portion of the base of the epistome and of the sides of the anal cone is formed of a remarkable tissue, composed of large cells, with transparent contents, hardly staining with colouring matters (fig. 2, 7). The nature of this tissue (which atrophies during the metamorphosis) is unknown to me. The revolution (about to be described) of the alimentary canal was obviously well understood by Barrois, although I did not formerly succeed in making out his exceedingly con- cise statements on this head. Figs. 8 and 9 represent two sections of an obliquely longitu- dinal series through a more advanced stage. Fig. 9 involves the rectum, whilst fig. 8 shows the mouth and cesophagus. In the latter figure is seen one of the deep portions of the vesti- bule lying at the sides of the rectum, which is itself of course ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 243 not visible. The dorsal organ and the sucker have both dege- nerated, and are represented merely by the “ globules” de- scribed by Barrois in various parts of the larva after its metamorphosis. These ‘ globules” are rounded nucleated cells, which do not stain readily with reagents, their general form being shown in fig. 8, &c. It is obvious, from an inspection of the two sections figured, that the stomach has now taken up a position inclined to the surface of attachment, the concavity of the alimentary canal being directed somewhat backwards. Remarkable changes, already described in part by Barrois, have by this time occurred.! Fig. 9 shows that the aperture of the vestibule has closed, so that this cavity has no longer any communication with the exterior. The vestibule is partially divided into three por- tions, which do not, however, quite correspond with those described by Barrois. The most ventral portion (v. v. in fig. 9) corresponds to the region near the previous vestibular aperture, and is destined to atrophy completely. The next portion (v. or.) is in connection with the mouth (fig. 8), whilst the most dorsal portion (v. an.) contains the anal cone, and is at this stage and later the largest and most important part of the vestibule. The second or oral division still communicates with the ventral portion, whilst it is almost separated from the dorsal or anal division by the growth of the epistome and of the lateral folds. In another section of the series it is seen that the oral and anal divisions of the vestibule still communicate by a small aperture, as in the diagram, fig. 16 (a. v. v.). The anal portion of the vestibule is very large, and is grow- ing, at the previously posterior end of the larva, away from the surface of attachment. The cells lining this part of the vestibule are obviously engaged in active growth and multi- 1 The following statements will be more readily understood with the assistance of Pl. XXII, fig. 16, representing in a diagrammatic form a median longitudinal section through an individual of the same age as figs. 8 and 9, 244, SIDNEY F. HARMER. plication, their protoplasm being finely granular and staining readily with colouring matters. The backward growth of the vestibule occurs first in the regions at the two sides of the anal cone (cf. fig. 3), but soon extends to the median portion be- hind the cone (fig. 9), so that this part of the vestibule grows towards the free end of the fixed larva, during the rotation of the alimentary canal, as a single actively extending diverticu- lum, in which the primary differentiation of median and lateral regions is no longer marked. Fig. 6 will serve to explain more clearly the relations of the oral grooves and neighbouring structures at a stage very slightly earlier than that of figs. 8 and 9. The section passes in a direc- tion corresponding to the line xk L in fig. 16, and consequently involves the apex of the epistome, the lateral folds, and the oral grooves. The anal cone, visible in fig. 5, is, of course, not involved by the section, which in other respects differs from the former figure mainly in the facts that the diameter of this por- tion of the vestibule has become lessened, and that by the par- tial rotation of the alimentary canal the apex of the epistome has come nearly into contact with the posterior wall of the vestibule (the manner in which this happens will be understood by comparing fig. 1 with fig. 16), the form of the lateral folds being at the same time altered (cf. fig. 6 with fig. 5). By this change of position of epistome and lateral folds, the oral and anal sections of the vestibule communicate merely by a com- paratively small round aperture. The oral grooves are no longer continuous posteriorly with the anal portion of the vestibule, although on the left side of the section at least, a trace of the former continuity is distinguishable. During later stages the growth of epistome and lateral folds completely separates the oral from the anal division of the vestibule, the aperture a.v.v. in fig. 6 being gradually constricted until it finally disappears. At the stage of figs. 8 and 9 a considerable amount of his- tolysis is taking place. This process affects specially the stomach, the epistome, the anal cone, and the ventral portion of the vestibule. In the case of the stomach, portions of the ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 245 epithelial cells and some of their nuclei pass bodily into the lumen of the organ (cf. figs. 8 and 9), where they are found quite free at later stages. The more projecting parts of the epistome and of the anal cone lose most of their component cells. The cilia of the latter become indistinct, the cell-sub- stance itself obviously degenerating (fig. 9). Ultimately ciliated portions of the cells are thrown off into the vestibule (figs. 9 and 12), in which they can be discovered until a very late stage in the metamorphosis. They no doubt leave the vestibule either by the mouth or by the (adult) vestibular aperture, when the latter is formed. The histolysis of the ventral portion of the vestibule (fig. 9, v. v.) similarly results in the passage of fragments of cells into its own cavity. This process is again illustrated by fig. 12, a section passing in the plane of the line EF in fig. 9. The permanent vestibule is in this section (cf. fig. 16) completely separated from the degenerating portion, its lumen, like that of the latter, con- taining fragments of degenerating cells. The ventral division of the vestibule (v. v.) in fig. 9 occupies the position of the future stalk, and in later stages its cavity becomes more and more reduced until it finally atrophies. During this process, the cells previously found in its lumen disappear. In sections parallel to the plane of attachment the cavity (just before its atrophy) appears as a fine tube surrounded by a series of elongated cells radiating from it towards the body wall. It is very tempting to assume that these cells are phagocytes, engaged in the destruction of the vestrbule. After the atrophy of the latter, its place is occupied by numerous “ globules” (fig. 10), which will themselves be replaced by ordinary connective-tissue corpuscles (fig. 13). The same assertion may be made of other parts of the “primary body cavity,” which is at the stage of fig. 9 almost completely filled with “ globules,” resulting from the histolysis of the brain, the sucker, the tissue at the base of the epistome and anal cone, and other larval structures. When the primary individual is mature the ‘‘ globules” have disappeared, and are 246 SIDNEY F. HARMER. replaced by a gelatinous matrix, in which lie connective-tissue corpuscles. Are we not justified im assuming that the “ slobules” are the active agents in the histolysis, and that they are in fact typical phagocytes ? During the histolysis of portions of the anal cone, the latter structure itself becomes much depressed. This feature of the metamorphosis, although already obvious in fig. 9, may be further illustrated by means of fig. 7, a section passing in a plane corresponding to the line 1 g in fig. 16. Owing to the further depression (occurring at a slightly later stage) of the anal cone, the marked bilateral arrangement of this part of the vestibule is, in part at least, lost. At the stage of figs. 8 and 9, as cau be easily seen from these figures them- selves, the posterior portion of the vestibule is no longer re- duced in the median plane to a small slit between anal cone and vestibular wall (as in fig. 1), but is, in this position also, a spacious cavity lined by a columnar epithelium (fig. 9). After the anal cone has reached the condition of the latter figure the vestibule, in sections parallel to the long axis of the stomach, will usually appear bounded posteriorly by a simple uniformly curved wall, whilst its oesophageal side is floored by the degenerating tissue of the epistome (fig. 7). In later stages, however, the well-developed epithelium of the sides of the vestibule extends inwards, so that the cavity is then en- tirely bounded by its permanent, partially regenerated epi- thelium. In the next stage represented very considerable changes have occurred, whereby the alimentary canal has taken up a position not unlike that which it will ultimately retain. Fig. 10 represents an actual section which passes in the median longitudinal plane of a larva at this stage. Whereas in fig. 16 the axis of the stomach is but slightly inclined to the surface of attachment, in the present instance it has assumed a position almost at right angles to this plane, and the con- cavity of the gut is now directed towards the primitively pos- terior end of the fixed larva. In the course of this rotation of the alimentary canal the vestibule, owing to atrophy of one ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDIOELLINA. 247 at least of the portions described in the last stage, has become somewhat simplified. All the more ventral regions (situ- ated in the neighbourhood of the surface of attachment) have completely disappeared, and in their place is found a mass of cells filling a cylindrical stalk, which obviously corresponds to that of the adult Pedicellina. The anal division of the ves- tibule has continued its backward growth and now lies almost at the free end of the young animal. At about this stage it acquires a secondary opening to the exterior on the side corre- sponding to the posterior surface of the larva. This opening is formed by a simple concrescence between the vestibular epithelium and the external ectoderm of the body, accompa- nied by a linear perforation formed at the point of junction of these two distinct portions of ectoderm. My sections have given me no indication of the occurrence of a ‘labial invagi- nation” (Barrois, q. v.) placing the above portion of the ves- tibule in connection with the exterior. The character of the vestibular aperture, immediately after its formation, may be seen from fig. 1], a section passing in a plane corresponding to cH 1n fig. 10. The vestibular aperture, at the sides of which tentacles (¢.) are already developing, is shown, by an examination of the remaining sections of the series, to have the form of a slit elongated in the direction of the median plane of the animal. Immediately before the for- mation of the aperture the vestibular epithelium would appear, in a section of this kind, quite unconnected with the external ectoderm, but already extending towards it in the form of a median groove, similar in appearance to the portion gy. v. in fig Ll: The mouth in fig. 10 has, at first sight, the appearance of being closed. By a comparison, however, of fig. 10 with fig. 16, it would seem that the apex of the epistome is really represented (in the former) by the ectoderm closing the (per- manent) mouth, and it is thus probable that the commence- ment of the digestive tube in fig. 10 (v. or.) is a part of the oral division of the vestibule. This impression is strongly confirmed by a section (uot figured) similar to, but later than, 248 SIDNEY F. HARMER. fig. 9. In the individual referred to, the stalk portion of the vestibule is still present, but is small, and is connected with the cesophagus very much as in the diagram fig. 16; i.e. at some distance from the point where the apex of the epistome ultimately meets the vestibular wall. In somewhat later stages the permanent mouth is formed by the perforation of the septum between the two portions of the vestibule in fig. 10, and probably in the position of the aper- ture a. v. v. in fig. 16. In living individuals of the same age could usually be dis- covered a small projection of the surface of the body in the region marked ?s. in fig. 10. This represents the larval “sucker,” which, as Barrois has correctly stated, disappears during the metamorphosis. The region of the “ dorsal organ” or brain of the larva is doubtless indicated by the marked angle on the left side of the stalk of the individual just referred to. None of the previous histological peculiarities of the organ re- main at this stage, and it is in fact already almost impossible to distinguish with certainty its position. It appears to me that Barrois has suggested the real expla- nation of the metamorphosis of Pedicellina, although he has confined himself to one or two short statements, which are given without any indication of the manner in which they are to be interpreted. I quote below one or two passages from Barrois’ note so many times referred to (3), the given quota- tions reproducing, so far as I am aware, the whole of Barrois’ explanation of this complicated subject. (i) ‘La premiére position” [corresponding, from the de- scription, with my own fig. 10] “représente un état tout a fait analogue au Loxosoma, avec anus en haut et csophage en bas.” (ii) “ L’inférieure”? [portion du vestibule] ‘‘ qui porte la couronne, et dont les éléments viennent former la glande du pied.” (iii) “‘ Les deux organes énigmatiques de l’exoderme”’ [i. e. sucker and dorsal organ] . . . . “ne sont, suivant moi, que des organes provisoires; tous deux sont rejetés sur la face ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 249 dorsale, ov ils finissent par disparaitre, peu a peu. Sans doute il faut voir, dans les deux soies décrites par Salensky sur la face dorsale du Loxosoma crassicauda, le reste de l’organe des sens antérieur”’ [i. e. the dorsal organ] “ qui, d’apres mes recherches, vient occuper cette place.” I have already (4) explained my reasons for the belief that the dorsal organ at any rate, and perhaps the sucker, are im- portant organs, which throw considerable light upon the mor phology of the Polyzoa, so that I cannot accept Barrois’ con- clusion that these structures have no particular significance. It is obvious that, however accurate Barrois’ conclusions (quoted above) may be, they need further explanation. The similarity between larva and adult in the Entoprocta, even in the position of the buds in Loxosoma, is so striking that some means of comparing the two stages is necessary. I therefore suggest the following explanation of the relation between larva and adult. It does not seem to me that Caldwell’s theory of the sur- faces of the Polyzoa receives any support from the metamor- phosis of Pedicellina. The short line between mouth and anus remains unchanged throughout the metamorphosis, and in order to prove that it is not ventral, it still remains neces- sary to show that the dorsal organ of the larva is not a brain, and that the larval surfaces do not correspond with those of a Trochosphere. Figs. 17—19 (Pl. XXII) are diagrams representing a pos- sible explanation of the metamorphosis of the Entoprocta, but although founded on the history of Pedicellina, Loxo- soma is the form which is actually (hypothetically) repre- sented. Fig. 17 explains a possible conception of one of the earlier stages in the acquirement of the sessile habit by the free- swimming Polyzoon ancestors. The form is, however, to all intents and purposes, a Loxosoma larva, with brain, sub- cesophageal ganglion (not discovered in Pedicellina until a stage later than fig. 10), and a pair of buds, one of which is shown, I believe there are no authentic instances of the fixa- 250 SIDNEY F. HARMER. tion of a Polyzoon larva by any other than its oral surface, and it may therefore be assumed that this method of fixation was acquired at a very early stage in the phylogeny of the group. Let us suppose, however, that this ‘“Archi-Loxo- soma,” on fixing itself by the edge of its vestibule, left an aperture (for the entrance of food), surrounded by the ciliated ring (vide fig. 17), leading from the exterior into the otherwise closed vestibule, and situated behind the anus. Subsequent development may be imagined to give rise to a form like fig. 18, in which the vestibular opening is an elon- gated slit, extending along the whole of the region formerly occupied by the posterior side, and still surrounded by the ciliated ring. The mouth, in order to obtain its food as con- veniently as possible, now faces the posterior side (of the former stage), and this has entailed a rotation of the entire alimentary canal, in the manner shown in fig. 18. _ By the growth of the proximal end of the Polyzoon, the mouth would be thrust away from the point of support, and the animal might thereby obtain an advantage in procuring food by means of its ciliary currents. But during this process, the proximal portions of the ciliated ring would become far less efficient for obtaining food than the distal portions, and would tend to atrophy. The final result would be the acquire- ment of a form like fig. 19, representing in a very slightly diagrammatic form, an adult Loxosoma. The ciliated ring is here represented as consisting of two disconnected portions, cor- responding (1) to the ring of tentacles ; (2) to the foot-gland (ef. the second of Barrois’ conclusions quoted on p. 248). The foot- gland has remained practically as an open groove, a series of ciliated tentacles having been developed round the margin of the permanent vestibule. The position of the buds in the larval Loxosoma appears at first sight fatal to the above hypothesis. That this larva does actually develop buds normally can hardly be doubted, since I have shown not only that these structures are developed twenty-four hours after hatching (which might, however, be an abnormal circumstance, due to the want of proper conditions ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 251 for fixation), but also that ectodermic thickenings, the com- mencements of the buds, are to be detected some time before the embryo is ready to leave the maternal vestibule, the possi- bility of the development having been influenced by abnormal conditions being here out of the question. In figs. 17,18, and 19, the position of the dorsal organ is represented as not having been much altered during the rota- tion of the alimentary canal, which has, so to speak, been pulled through the loop formed by the dorsal organ and the somewhat hypothetical subcesophageal ganglion. Assuming for the moment this position for the dorsal organ, we find that throughout the metamorphosis the buds retain their original situation (in Loxosoma) between the dorsal organ and the ciliated ring, and that their position with regard to the ceso- phagus is practically the same as that which characterised them at their first appearance. Is there, however, any reason for believing that the position of the dorsal organ is correctly indicated in the diagrams? It seems to me that this question must be answered in the affirma- tive. In the first place, the degenerating dorsal organ of Pedicellina does in reality occupy this position, and in the second place (vide No. 3 of Barrois’ conclusions on p. 248), the circumcesophageal commissures may be represented by the strong ganglionated nerves passing from the ganglion to the “posterior sense-organs”” in L. crassicauda, as originally described by Salensky (see also No. 4, Pl. xix, fig.1). Should the metamorphosis of Loxosoma be proved to bear out this suggestion of Barrois’, we must assume either that the whole brain has atrophied, or that the adult possesses at most a small portion of the brain at the ends of the two widely separated cesophageal commissures. With regard to the actual metamorphosis of Pedicellina, I have to point out that Ihave not succeeded in demonstrating the presence either of cesophageal commissures or of a sub- cesophageal ganglion. The latter structure becomes distinct only at a stage later than fig. 10, and it then has the position which characterises the adult ganglion. VOL, XXVII, PART 2.—NEW SEK 8 bo Pe SIDNEY F. HARMER. No. 1 of Barrois’ conclusions quoted on p. 248, appears to me perfectly just. It is impossible in fact not to be struck with the great resemblance between the solitary Pedicellina shown in fig. 10 and an adult Loxosoma, and this similarity is quite conspicuous even at much later stages. The obliquity of the lophophore in Loxosoma is hence, on the view already explained, another of the archaic features of this genus, the lophophore having still a marked inclination to the “ anterior” side of the animal (fig. 19). It is unfortunate that the metamorphosis of Loxosoma, which possesses a foot-gland, should be unknown, but we are able to make certain inferences from the phenomena of budding. Both vestibule and foot-gland originate as longitudinal groove- like invaginations of the ectoderm of the “ anterior” face of the bud. Fig. 15 is a reproduction of a drawing from Oscar Schmidt, in which the foot-gland is represented as originating from the two proximal cells of the ectoderm of the “ anterior” side of the bud, and in which it is further seen that these cells are not in the least marked off from those which are taking part in the formation of the vestibule. The relations of lopho- phore and foot-gland in this figure are indeed exactly those of the ciliated ring in the diagram (fig. 18). The Metamorphosis of Pedicellina viewed in its relation to the above Hypothesis. I have no reason to believe that the position of the ciliated ring shown in fig 1] is in any way altered during the subsequent metamorphosis. This structure in all probability degenerates in situ. The ciliary apparatus of an ordinary Trochosphere is not, however, constituted entirely by the preoral circlet. In the neighbourhood of the latter there occurs in Polygordius, e. g., (cf. Hatschek, No. 2) a series of smaller cilia forming a postoral circlet, whilst a third part of the apparatus is con- stituted by “‘a ciliated groove running between the two ciliated rings, and prolonging itself into the ciliated mouth,” This ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 253 last portion is obviously represented in Pedicellina by the ciliated oral grooves, continuous, as in Polygordius, with the mouth. The relations of these grooves during the meta- morphosis appear to me to deserve further consideration. We have found that the median postanal portion of the vestibule is continuous with the oral grooves, of which it may, indeed, be said to form a part. Acccording to Hatschek (1) it is, like other portions of the vestibule, lined by ciliated cells. If we are justified in assuming that the oral groove—a part of the typical Trochospheral ciliary apparatus—extends, poten- tially at least, from the mouth completely round the vestibule to the postanal region, it seems to me that considerable light is thrown on the metamorphosis. The morphological position of the oral groove will be in no way altered during the rotation of the alimentary canal, and in fig. 16 it will continue to pass from the mouth round the ab-anal side of the altered lateral folds to the median post-anal portion of the vestibule, even though it is no longer distinguishable in the persisting division of the latter structure. In figs. 16 and 6 we observe, however, the commencement of a separation of the oral groove into two parts—one continuous with, and becoming indistinguishable from, the “ oral” section of the vestibule (v. or. in fig. 16), and the other potentially passing from the free apex of the epistome in fig. 16 to the end of the reference line m. v. in the same figure. The position of this latter portion will be the median line passing from a.v.v. to m.v. Owing to the fact that it is situated behind the anal cone it is, of course, unpaired (cf. fig. 5), and it appears to me that its situation may be very fairly considered to be represented by the linear groove which in fig. 11 has formed the permanent vestibular aperture. From the margins of this groove are developed the tentacles, which, if the above reasoning is legitimate, are formed from the region of the oral groove. The fact that the tentacles of the adult lophophore of the oral side are on the ab-anal side of the mouth appears to me 254 SIDNEY F. HARMER. to prove that the lophophore itself is developed from a mor- phologically preoral portion of the oral groove. The relation between the velum proper and the oral cilia has become, in the Entoprocta, considerably complicated by the formation of a fold of integument (vestibular wall), carrying the former to some distance from the latter. When the Pedicellina larva attaches itself, the distance between the two structures becomes increased. The velar portion maintains its position at fixation, and soon atrophies ; the oral groove, on the contrary, growing away from the degenerated velum. Even during the phylogenetic history of the process we may suppose that the velum atrophied at fixation. This is par excellence a locomotive structure, and would be useless in an attached condition. The oral cilia would, however, continue (in the hypothetical stage of fig. 18) to convey food to the mouth, and the cells bearing them would, after a time, become prolonged into tentacles, by which their range of activity would be extended. During the abbreviated metamorphosis of Pedicellina it has hence resulted (if the above be true) that the velum takes no part in the change of position involved in the passage to the adult condition. Summarizing the above, I may express my conviction (1) that the metamorphosis of Pedicellina is a simple modifica- tion of a more archaic process, due to abbreviation of develop- ment, (2) that the oral groove persists in part as the adult lophophore, (3) that the vestibule closes at fixation, and under- goes the whole of its alterations in the interior of the larva, opening secondarily only when the adult condition is practi- cally attained. The adult form is reached by the elongation of the stalk of fig. 10, and by the replacement of its contained “ globules ” by characteristic connective-tissue and muscle-cells ; by the for- mation of a stolon and a diaphragm, and by various alterations in the calyx. The more important of these consist in the complete (or almost complete) loss of the obliquity of the lophophore, in the development of the permanent ganglion ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 955 and generative organs (if these are formed in the primary individual, as is probably the case) and in the complete forma- tion of the vestibular aperture and tentacles. I have made no special observations on most of the above points, although on the important question of the origin of the colony from the primary individual, I am able to throw some light. In the first place, it may be stated that adult colonies are by no means restricted to one growing point, as stated by Hatschek (1). Of very common occurrence is the develop- ment of two growing points, one at each end of the unbranched stolon: I have noticed this even before the formation of a single secondary calyx. A third growing point may be deve- loped as a lateral branch of the main stolon; the amount of branching is, however, always slight in P. echinata, and apparently in all cases the cesophagus of each calyx is on the side directed to the growing point to which this calyx properly belongs, as already indicated by Hatschek. The formation of the stolon is shown in fig. 13, a longi- tudinal section of the stalk of a completely developed but still solitary individual. The young stolon, which is cut medianly, is developed on the cesophageal side of the Pedicel- lina. The base of the stalk (which is alone represented) con- sists of a thick cuticle, underneath which occurs a layer of ectoderm, surrounding a gelatinous matrix in which lie con- nective-tissue and muscle-cells. The section, however,—an extremely good preparation—is contradictory to the theory of Hatschek, according to which the apex of the stolon is pro- vided with a hypoblastic vesicle derived from the dorsal organ, and engaged in the formation of the mid-gut of the secondary calyces. I may at once state that I have entirely failed to convince myself of the occurrence of any such vesicle, at any period, in the stolon, and I am forced to believe that Hatschek has been mistaken in assuming its existence. Neither in sections nor in entire specimens (whether living or treated with reagents) could I discover the slightest evidence of the presence of Hatschek’s vesicle, although I have investigated both adult and young stolons in this connection. 256 SIDNEY F. HARMER. It appears to me probable that the growing point of the stolon of Pedicellina (vide fig. 13) consists solely of an ecto- dermic layer secreting a cuticle and of a mass of indifferent mesodermic connective-tissue cells, embedded in a structure- less jelly. If this is the case, the only organ derived from the hypoblast of the embryo would appear to be the mesenteron of the primary individual, all other parts of the colony being devoid of any derivatives of hypoblast cells. This conclusion can hardly be avoided unless we assume that some of the stellate cells of fig. 16 are really hypoblastic in nature, although indistinguishable from the mesoderm cells in their appearance. Owing to the nature of the process by which the dorsal organ degenerates, it is impossible to assert that some of its cells do not become ameboid wandering cells which migrate into the growing point. It can, however, be safely stated that no hypoblastic vesicle is formed from the degenerating dorsal organ. It may further be pointed out that the conclusion arrived at on a previous occasion as to the nervous (epiblastic) nature of the dorsal organ, in Pedicellina as in Loxosoma, is in opposition to the view that this struc- ture plays any part in the budding. The well-known fact that calyces of Pedicellina may fall from their stalks, which thereupon develop new calyces, appears to me in direct contradiction to Hatschek’s view of the bud- ding. The loss of the calyces is probably a normal, periodically occurring process, which is perhaps to be regarded as a means of rejuvenescence, and which is at least analogous to the forma- tion of the “ brown bodies ” in the Ectoprocta. Itis exceed- ingly easy to discover individuals in healthy colonies in which the calyx has been lost, and a new “ bud” (easily recognised by its small size and immature condition) is being developed just below the scar. Specimens kept in captivity seem inva- riably to lose their calyces if the quantity of water is not very large, the calyx falling off at the “diaphragm.” This struc- ture, which is merely a constriction at the base of the calyx, filled by a row of flat cells, is perhaps a special arrangement by which the calyx can break away from the stalk, without ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 257 injury to the latter. I have been unable to show that calyces which have thus left their stalks are able to become the starting- points of fresh colonies. The specimens under observation have invariably died after a day or two, even if kept in a tide-pool. Calyces formed at the scars produced in the manner above indicated, seem to me (from superficial examination of entire specimens) to develop in exactly the same manner as those produced at the true growing point. The occurrence of this phenomenon is undoubtedly adverse to Hatschek’s theory of budding ; the whole of the stomach falls away with the calyx, whilst the existence of a plug of cells filling up the diaphragm appears to preclude the possibility of the migration of any cells derived from the stomach to the proximal side of the diaphragm. Unless, indeed, it is assumed that some of the “‘ connective-tissue ” cells of the stalks as well as of the stolon are endodermic in nature, it must be concluded that none of the cells of the bud are descendants of any of the cells belong- ing to the embryonic hypoblast. With regard to the further history of the budding (whether at the growing point or at the apex of an old stalk) I have very little to say. The free end of the stolon (or stalk) before long develops an ectodermic invagination (fig. 14) destined to give rise to the lophophore and, according to my view, to the whole of the alimentary canal of the bud. The latter is from the first continuous with the lophophoral rudiment, and in other sections of the series to which fig. 14 belongs, the stomach and vestibular cavity are separated from one another by means of a septum. The latter does not, however, cut off the whole of the deepest part of the invagination, but, since it is not deve- loped in the position of the cesophagus the vestibule and stomach remain continuous with one another (as in fig. 14). By the formation of a diaphragm and by other processes already described by Hatschek, the bud attains its adult condition. The continuation of the stolon is formed by a lateral outgrowth from that region in the young bud which afterwards becomes the base of its stalk, precisely as in fig. 13 with the exception of the fact that the new growing point is formed long before the 958 SIDNEY F. HARMER. bud is itself mature. It is worthy of remark that the young vestibular invagination does not occur accurately at the apex of the stolon, but on the side of the apex turned towards the growing point. In this respect it exactly agrees with the position of the vestibular invagination formed near the apex of a stalk which has lost its calyx, and again with that of the incompletely rotated vestibule in intermediate stages of the metamorphosis. It may indeed be said that the young vestibule of all the buds is inclined towards the growing point, and that in all cases it subsequently undergoes a rotation in the same direction (but to a less marked degree) as that occur- ing at the metamorphosis. The history of the Pedicellina-larva appears to me to point to the existence of a fixation-period in Loxosoma also. In this case, the buds observed by me in the larva of L. Lepto- clini would probably have to undergo a change of position, during the metamorphosis, similar to that represented in figs. 17—19. I am inclined to believe that the degeneration of the larval stomach observed in the same species, after a free life of one or two days, was abnormal, and was due to the absence of the conditions necessary for fixation. On the Nature of the “Brown Bodies” of the Ecetoprocta. The above statements with regard to the life-history of the Entoprocta may, perhaps, give some indication of the manner in which the “ brown bodies” of the Ectoprocta have origi- nated. There can probably be no longer any doubt whatever that these structures are degenerated polypides, which are subsequently replaced by new ones budded off from the walls of the zccecia. In the metamorphosis of Pedicellina the purely larval organs degenerate and form a mass of cells, which subsequently become connective-tissue cells. The degeneration is here slight, and has not yet acquired sufficient importance to give rise to a characteristic “ brown body.” ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 259 Whilst in the adult Loxosoma nothing comparable to the formation of “ brown bodies” is known, the adnlt Pedicel- lina has developed a special arrangement—the constriction at the base of the calyx—by which the latter may be lost without material injury to the remainder of the colony. In the adult Ectoprocta there seems to be the same necessity for the rejuvenescence of some of the organs, but here the occurrence of a thick ectocyst, usually intimately con- nected with that of neighbouring individuals, in general pre- vents the loss of any part of the body wall, asin Pedicellina. In some of the stoloniferous Ctenostomata, however, the entire zocecium is deciduous. But even in Pedicellina one may almost speak of a “‘zocecium” in the same sense as in the Ectoprocta. It isa well-known fact that septa occur at intervals across the stolon of Pedicellina, and in most cases are developed in such a manner that a piece of the stolon, connected with the base of each stalk, is cut off from the remainder of the stolon by a pair of symmetricaliy-placed septa. There are thus typically two septa between the bases of each two stalks, and stalk-bearing and stalkless sections of the stolon alternate regularly with one another. It is thus possible to consider stalk plus portion of stolon connected with it, the representative of a zocecium. The distal end of the zocecium is from time to time segmented off, carry- ing with it the whole of the alimentary apparatus, whilst a new polypide is developed within the remaining portion by a process of budding. By the formation of a new constriction the distal part of the zocecium—the calyx—becomes again differentiated from the proximal part—the stalk. In the Ectoprocta the occurrence of the same process is usually obviously impossible, and the polypide alone degenerates, forming a ‘“ brown body” which subsequently passes into the new stomach, and is ejected by the anus. The occurrence of this circumstance is already foreshadowed in two particulars in Pedicellina. We find, in the first place, that a new polypide is actually budded off by the ectoderm of the zocecium at or 260 SIDNEY F. HARMER. before the loss of the calyx; and, in the second place, that the tissues have already acquired, at the metamorphosis, the power of disposing of degenerated structures. In the Ectoprocta one may hence suppose that, owing to the inconvenience of losing a portion of the zocecium at each rejuvenescence, the new polypide is budded off near the pre- ceding one, instead of from an entirely different part of the zocecium, as in Pedicellina (below the diaphragm). The degenerating alimentary canal and other structures are then worked up by the “ Parenchymgewebe” (Vigelius), which has inherited this kind of power from the larval tissues, into the condition of a “brown body,” which passes into the new stomach, and reaches the exterior by means of the anus. In the development of the Ectoprocta an archenteron is formed, in a large number of cases at least. The embryo is, however, richly supplied with yolk; it develops within the in- terior of the parent, and its alimentary canal is hence, in many cases, functionless. At its metamorphosis this larva possesses no functional ali- mentary canal, and must hence form a new one. But since in its previous phylogenetic history our Polyzoon has acquired the power of developing new “ polypides” from various parts of its ectoderm, a fresh gut could without difficulty be formed within the bedy wall of the metamorphosed larva; since the latter is now in the same condition as an adulJt zocecium whose polypide has just become a “ brown body.” This, indeed, is what actually happens. The larva passes at once into the condition of a zocecium containing a “ brown body,” the remains of its larval organs. The complicated me- tamorphosis of Pedicellina has been given up, the larval structures now degenerating by the method employed during the atrophy of the polypides in adult individuals, and finally leaving the zocecium by passing as the first ‘‘ brown body” into the alimentary tract of the primary polypide, and thence to the exterior. The metamorphosing Ectoproctan larva is probably in the same condition (irrespective of the difference pointed out ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 261 in the methods by which the alimentary canal is lost in the two cases) as the primary individual of a Pedicellina colony would be immediately after the loss of its calyx, supposing that it had not meanwhile developed a stolon and secondary calyces. Unless I am mistaken in my views with regard to the meta- morphosis of Pedicellina, it appears to me necessary to con- clude that in the Hntoprocta the ventral line of the body extends from a.v.* in figs. 10 and 19, down the right sides of the figures, as far as a. v.! The median dorsal line will in con- sequence be represented by the entire left sides from a.v.! to a.v.” These surfaces are most clearly expressed in the young Loxosoma bud, in which the whole of the surface turned away from the parent (characterised by the possession of ves- tibule and foot-gland) is ventral, whilst the opposite surface of the bud is, conversely, dorsal. I hope to be able before long to publish some account of the development and metamorphosis of the Ectoprocta. Till that time I prefer to withhold any further expression of opinion with regard to the surfaces and relations of the larve of this group of the Polyzoa. List oF Papers REFERRED TO. 1. B. Hatscnex.— Embryonalentwicklung und Knospung der Pedicellina echinata,” ‘ Zeits. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xxix, 1877, 8. 502. 2. B. Harscorx.— Studien zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Anneliden,”’ © Arb. a. d. Zool. Inst. zu Wien,’ Bd. i, 1878, S. 277. 3. J. Barrots.—“ Métamorphose de la Pédicelline.” ‘Comptes rendus de PAcad. des Sci.,’ T. xcii, 1881, p. 1527. 4. 8. FE. Harmer.—“ On the Structure and Development of Loxosoma,” ‘Quart. Journ. Mic. Sci.,’ vol. xxv, 1885, p. 261. 262 SIDNEY F. HARMER. EXPLANATION OF PLATES XXI & XXII, Illustrating Mr. S. F. Harmer’s Paper on “ The Life-history of Pedicellina.” Reference Letters. an. Anus. an.c. Analcone. a.v.tand a.v.? Hypothetical morphologically anterior and posterior ends, respectively, of the vestibular aperture. a. v. v. Aperture between oral and anal divisions of vestibule (in position of permanent mouth). d. Bud. 4ér. Brain (= “dorsal organ”). c.c. Fragments of ciliated cells. c.p. Ciliated pit of brain. c. 7. Cihated ring. d.s. Dorsal sense-organ (of Loxosoma). epst. Epistome. / dr. Fibrous part of brain. fg. Foot-gland. ga. Ganglion of adult. g.p. Growing point of stolon. g.v. Median groove of permanent vestibule, ultimately becoming the vesti- bular aperture (in position of part of oral groove of larva?). zé. Intestine. 1.7. Lateral fold of vestibular wall. 7. v. Lateral portions of anal division of vestibule. m. Mouth. mes. Mesoderm. m.v. Median postanal portion of the anal division of the vestibule. @. Csophagus. o.g. Oral groove. rec. Rectum. s. Sucker. s¢. Stomach. ¢. Tentacle. v. Vestibule. v. a. Its aperture. v. an. “ Anal” division of vestibule. v. or. “Oral” division. v. v. Ventral division. z. Large-celled tissue at base of epistome and anal cone. PLATE XXI. Pedicellina echinata. Fic. 1.—Median longitudinal section of a larva quite recently fixed (on . Coralline). Fic. 2.—Obliquely longitudinal section (in the plane C D in figs 3 and 4?) of a similar larva. Fic. 3.—Horizontal section of a slightly older larva, passing through brain (= dorsal organ), esophagus, epistome, and anal cone. Fic. 4.—Obliquely transverse section (in the plane A B in fig. 1), at a stage very soon after fixation. 1 In describing one section as passing in a plane indicated in the figure of another, it is to be understood that the details in the two individuals do not always exactly correspond. This is due, partly to a difference in age between the two larve figured, and partly to variations in the position of the internal structures, owing to varying conditions of muscular contraction. ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF PEDICELLINA. 263 Fic. 5.—Horizontal section, at an early stage in the metamorphosis, passing through the tip of the epistome, the lateral folds and oral grooves, and the apex of the anal cone. Fics. 6 and 7.—Two sections of a considerably older individual, passing respectively in the planes K L and I J in Fig. 16. Fies. 8 and 9.—Two sections of an individual of the age of Fig. 16, passing in an obliquely longitudinal direction. Fig. 8 cuts the mouth and one of the lateral portions of the permanent vestibule, Fig. 9 passing through the rectum and the degenerating vestibule of the stalk. In another section of the same series the two parts of the vestibule are continuous, exactly as in the diagram, Fig. 16. Fic. 10.—Median longitudinal section of an advanced, but still solitary, individual. Fic. 11.—Horizontal section (in the plane GH in Fig. 10) through a similar specimen. Fie. 12.—Section of an individual of the age of Figs. 8 and 9, passing in the plane E F in the latter figure. Fie. 13.—Median longitudinal section through the stalk of a solitary individual with commencing primary stolon. The arrow indicates the position of the oral side of the calyx. Fic. 14.—Obliquely transverse section of a young bud, developed at the growing point. PLATE XXII. Fic. 15.—Young bud of Loxosoma, from the ventral side. Copied from O. Schmidt, ‘ Arch. f. mik. Anat.,’ Bd. xii, 1876, Pl. ITI, fig. 17. Fie. 16.—Diagrammatic longitudinal section of a metamorphosing Pedi- cellina at the stage of Figs. 8, 9, &c. Fies. 17—19.—Diagrams illustrating the supposed morphological nature of the metamorphosis of the Entoprocta, A full explanation is given in the text. | . a . Pi, | re on ; ee 2 i rar ~, ae ia wy . Ry | - ve = 7 toa favtitonaert ne iediaos tli stip fa heen Bale Cae Or iw AAD ore 0 cethee Tad Perit Wl? . CTT ah aut oi: aires ary ‘iio ota Ceci: v i" Higiain ‘et! ” nea fe e ~ sel wl MH Hil ia ; al. fall uf f d _ ities Life ed Vela aft {a abit Ae dike ti etOrena4 ssw 'itlon D nr) a? Teune? a Mover edhe ¥ 54 ih imerate ith ei le RAY pew 0a Gs aay LPT lt) w imate oh iin «Views? Wy vated Gana Aa aie SWyewiatiltese ul Hetil a y pee i Tite «Mig Ag Arr pO Ro ev lhrelt: al yp ) Ree a " a. ” ¢ velbee (bie. tig mee wipe eae Whe “euha? (enhipidal gulf hi f ; Jan ha e Copa) (Ptah vaes wally sit iy Teal i innate Nfl > it sia 4 i “Ltt yah ie) Dita | . i tor uae Sas he T ies 3 head ys thal \ Lovee ives i. tu V. dethe ‘ albus an Aly * (eid) ai ew ; ait opr be tflacreaabl yrs finaly Awad 7 i @ uy ? a( ite i i,t iin) eta TLE scr it ar + 8 suit at a9 iM Ay) hy (Ate? LHOKA i | he teil why ecu? @ alge Huet ein |, Mf este | P L jie an si > Aoee “bial la ar Vy A ell As @ 1h, a is at winiuel 8 ALLLcA) Ee bd (Che AL & ; Sa en ae see 4 “i h OG) THA OMe Ta fer wil hey Lait law Ts VP : oy i ifwiderm i ADA, Hulls > TPOTHU ARAL: Gar dati ol ; 5 h 4 & - 4 - ‘ Le a Mey * a a — | - 6 if ‘ ; » EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 265 Dr. Dohrn’s Inquiries into the Evolution of Organs in the Chordata. By J.T. Cunningham, B.A., F.R.S.E. SEVEN years elapsed from the publication of the ‘ Ursprung der Wirbelthiere’ before the appearance of the first of Dohrn’s ‘Studien zur Urgeschichte des Wirbelthierkorpes,’ that on the mouth of Teleosteans. As he points out in a short preface to that paper the three chief peculiar articles of faith in his previous essay, in comparison with the views current at the time, were that the ancestors of Vertebrates closely resembled Annelids, that the principle of change of function was the safest guide in tracing morphological histories, and that the extent to which degeneration might proceed was unlimited. In the attempt to reconstruct the Vertebrate ancestor, Dohrn has concentrated his attention almost exclusively on the actual structure and development of the organs of existing Vertebrates, convinced that a great deal of what was generally believed concerning the relation of the organs was inaccurate, and that no light could be thrown on the question by hasty conclusions drawn from superficial resemblances of the organs of Vertebrate and other embryos, until the organisation of the Vertebrates themselves was more thoroughly investigated. The following is a list of the studies with the dates of pub- lication : 1882. I. “ Der Mund der Knochenfische.” II. “Die Entstehung und Bedeutung der Hypophysis bei den Teleostiern.” 1883. III. “ Die Entstehung und Bedeutung der Hypophysis bei Petro- myzon Planeri.” 266 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. 1884. IV. “Die Entwicklung und Differenzirung der Kiemenbogen der Selachier.” V. “Zur Entstehung und Differenzirung der Visceralbogen bei Pe- tromyzon Planeri.” VI. “Die paarigen und unpaaren Flossen der Selachier.” 1885. VII. “ Entstehung und Differenzirung des Zungenbein und Kiefer Apparates der Selachier.” ' VIII. “Die Thyreoidea bei Petromyzon, Amphioxus, und den Tuni- |: | caten.” IX. “Die Bedeutung der Unpaaren Flosse fiir die Beurtheilung der genealogischen Stellung der Tunicaten und des Amphioxus, und die Reste der Beckenflosse bei Petromyzon.” X. “ Zur Phylogenese des Wirbelthierauges.” Ancestral Mouth—TIn the first of these studies reference is made to the question of the position of the ancestral mouth, which in the‘ Ursprung der Wirbelthiere’ was located between the crura cerebelli in the fourth ventricle. Professor Fritsch and Mr. Sanders argued that this was an untenable supposition, because it would be impossible to accept the consequence of it, namely, that all the cerebral nerves belonged to a supra- cesophageal ganglion. Dohrn acknowledges the justice of the objection, and provisionally abandons the quest of the ancestral mouth. He has never since resumed the inquiry. He deals with investigations of the development of the actual mouth, the results of which confirm his view that the aperture represents a united pair of gill-clefts. Im embryos of Teleosteans he found that there was no stomodzeum, and that the mouth arose as a pair of enteric outgrowths which at first opened to the exterior, one on each side, the apertures only subsequently meeting in the middle ventral line. Hypophysis of Teleosteans and Petromyzon. The hypophysis also in Teleosteans, according to the second paper of the series, does not arise from an ectodermal oral invagination or stomodeum, but from a pair of endodermal evaginations in front of those which form the mouth. The organ therefore represents a pair of przoral gill-clefts (i. e. it is derived in the Teleosteans from the endodermal parts of EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA, 267 such a pair) which in the actual development of Teleosteans never acquire an opening to the exterior. In a postscript to this paper Dohrn mentions Hatschek’s results concerning the origin of the ciliated pit in Amphioxus. This pit is the left of a pair of anterior evaginations of the endoderm, which opens to the exterior while the other remains closed. According to Dohrn these two diverticula are homologous with the hypo- physis in the Teleostean, and the opening in Amphioxus is the persistent branchial opening. The ciliated pit of the Ascidians is also homologous with that of Amphioxus. Ac- cording to Bateson the proboscis cavity with its pore in Balano- glossus is homologous with the ciliated pit in Amphioxus, but whether the body cavity of the proboscis in Balanoglossus can be derived from a pair of gill-clefts is a question which seems to threaten to do away with the possibility of the diagno- sis of organs according to their embryological origin. The hypophysis in Petromyzon has a unique history in the individual, and this forms the subject of the third member of the series. The examination of the embryos of Petromyzon was undertaken by Dohrn in order to prove that the funda- mental difference generally supposed to exist between the branchial cartilages of Selachians and of Petromyzon was entirely imaginary, but the discussion of this subject is post- poned till the hypophysis has been considered. Scott! had stated that the hypophysis of the Lamprey arose as an ecto- dermal invagination connected with the nasal pit. Balfour had doubted this result, but Dohrn entirely confirmed it, except that he found the hypophysial invagination to be at first separate, lying between the commencing mouth and nasal cavity, and that he pointed out that the whole long nasal duct of the adult which runs back beneath the brain is as much part of the hypophysis as the follicular organ formed from its inner ex- tremity.2. The nasal duct is in fact a fused pair of ectodermal 1 *Morph. Jahrb.,’ vii. 2 It seems extremely probable, although I am not aware that it has been suggested before, that the nasal duct which in Myxine opens into the pharynx, is homologous with the so-called nasal duct of Petromyzon. If this be so, of VOL, XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER, T 268 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. pits originally belonging to the pair of gill-clefts which has been transformed into the hypophysis. The function of the nasal duct in the adult is apparently to draw in water in order that it may reach the olfactory organ and then expel it; it is probably, to use an undignified word, a sniffing organ, neces- sitated by the disconnection of the mouth from the function of respiration. This new function of the hypophysial gill-clett could easily be derived from its original one. Visceral Arches of Elasmobranchs. In order to demonstrate the fallacy of the argument that the external branchial cartilages of Selachians were the repre- sentatives of a primitive “ external” branchial skeleton retained in the existing Cyclostomata, it would have been sufficient, says the beginning of the fourth study, to describe the development of these two cartilages (two to each arch) in Selachians and compare it with the quite different history of the branchial skeleton in the Lamprey. But it seemed advisable to give a complete account of the development of the Elasmobranch gill-arch, as previous results were fragmentary. It is to be understood that a typical arch such as the first, second, or third branchial, is under consideration, not the hyoid or the posterior, which are either modified or reduced. In a horizontal section of the arch towards its middle the cavity of the arch surrounded by its epithelial cells (head-cavity of course the connection between the pharynx and the nasal pits in Myxine is formed by the hypophysis and not by a nostril properly so named. The hypo- physial invagination in the embryo of Petromyzon comes into very close relation with the pharynx as well as with the infundibulum, and on the hypo- thesis which I have supported in my paper on Kupffer’s vesicle, &c., that the infundibulum represents the original mouth, it is easy to understand how a separation between infundibulum and pharynx might occur in either of two ways, by leaving the hypophysis connected only with the infundibulum as in Petromyzon, or by leaving the communication between hypophysis and pharynx still open as in Myxine. In other Vertebrates again the hypophysial invagination has been absorbed inte the stomodzum, and reaches from thence to the infundibulum, but has not retained a connection with the pharynx. These speculations can of course only be tested by examination of the deve- lopment of Myxine, EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 269 Balfour and his school) is seen in the centre dividing the section into an anterior and posterior half. This cavity is continuous below with the pericardium. The artery of the arch is on the posterior side of the cavity, or as it is better to call it, from the destination of its walls, of the muscle tube of the arch. The branchial processes grow out first on the pos- terior side, and along their base appears a vein which opens dorsally into the artery. Similarly on the anterior side appear branchial processes with an anterior vein, also opening into the artery. The two veins become connected by two hori- zontal commissures. In the adult the posterior vein becomes disconnected from the anterior and unites with the anterior vein of the arch behind it. The cartilaginous arch arises as a condensation of mesoderm cells posterior to the muscle-plate. Between the upper and lower venous commissures, where the muscle-tube is already diminished in thickness, condensation of mesoderm cells takes place also on the anterior side, and the two condensed masses uniting, eliminate the muscle-tube between them. This separa- tion of the muscle-tube does not take place dorsally and ven- trally, because the cartilaginous arch bends inwards in those regions. A central part of the muscle-tube is thus separated and lies on the inner side of the arch; it becomes the adductor arcus visceralis. Both Gegenbauer and Vetter believe the adductor mandibule to be homodynamous with the adductor arcus, but this is an error, the former is homodynamous with the whole musculature of one (or more) arch. The external middle portions of the tubes form the musculi interbranchiales ; the dorsal, externally the constrictor superficialis, internally the interarcuales. Other muscles come from the ventral portions, The coracohyoid is a true body muscle, and has nothing to do with visceral arches. The cartilage already described, the middle portion first developed, forms the two middle internodes of the adult arch. Above these dorsally is the basale, below the copulare. The cartilage separates the adductor from the interarcualis above, from the coracobranchialis below. The cartilage is internal to 270 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. the artery ; and the artery is at first posterior to the muscle- tube. The branchial cartilaginous rays arise as condensations of mesoderm cells separate from the arch, and between the artery and posterior vein. The so-called external cartilages are simply the most dorsal and the most ventral of the series of rays altered somewhat in position, and therefore have no similarity with the arches in Petromyzon, which are true arches. Branchial lamelle are never developed on the anterior side of the hyoid arch, or of the spiracular arch. The external filaments of the embryo arise as simple elongations of the posterior lamelle of each arch, the anterior not elongating at all. A curious suggestion is made concerning the function of these elongated filaments, namely, that they serve to absorb yolk ; how the yolk gets into them could not be discovered, but yolk is present in the filaments and in their veins, in the posterior branchial vein, and the efferent arteries, never in the branchial artery or in the heart. Thymus of Elasmobranchs. At the time when the external filaments have attained to about half their length, but when the branchial rays are not differentiated, a proliferation of epithelium takes place in the upper angle of the first gill-cleft, forming a kind of bud. Similar buds are formed in the four posterior gill-clefts, but the fifth bud disappears again entirely in the Sharks, but persists in the Rays. These buds form the thymus of the adult. The cause of the separation of these portions of the branchial epithelium is the shortening of the clefts. The upper portion of the original clefts is obliterated by a coales- cence of the arches, accompanied by processes of growth which alter the original position of the terminal rays of each series, and so produce the extra-branchial cartilages. The epithelial nodules of the thymus after they have sunk into the mesoderm become associated with mesodermic cells, a process which ought not to excite surprise, since the epithelium in question originally no doubt formed branchial laminz into which meso- derm extended. The bending of the arches above described is EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 271 connected with the formation of the united portions of the musculus constrictor superficialis, but the original cause of the whole process is to be explained only after further investiga- tions have been described. Lcker first definitely described the thymus of fishes in his article ‘‘ Blood-vessel Glands,” in Wag- ner’s ‘ Dictionary of Physiology,’ Bd. iv, but could find no such organ in the Sturgeon, in Cyclostomata, or in Teleosteans. In a foot-note Dohrn points out that the thymus of Teleosteans exists in the position already accurately defined by Leydig in his ‘ Anat. histol. Untersuchungen tiber Fische und Reptilien.’ In this note also emphatic contradiction is made of Gegen- baur’s generally accepted view that the pseudobranchia of Teleosteans is the reduced gill of the hyoid arch, and therefore not homologous with the pseudobranchia or spiracular gill of Elasmobranchs. Dohrn maintains that Johann Miller was quite right in asserting that the pseudobranchia of Teleosteans was homologous with the spiracular gill of Elasmobranchs, and that Balfour, who has been followed by Hoffmann, was mistaken in supposing that in the Teleosteans the choroid gland represents the spiracular gill. Stieda found that the thymus of mammals arose from only one gill-cleft, the last, or last but one ; Dohrn states that the carotid gland may possibly represent a rudimentary thymus derived from another cleft. Branchial Skeleton and Arches of Petromyzon. After showing that the extra-branchial cartilages of Elasmo- branchs are really displaced gill rays, the next point in arguing that the branchial skeleton of Petromyzon is composed of true branchial arches, is to demonstrate the development of this skeleton, and this is the object of the fifth paper. It is known from the researches of Scott and Balfour that the first trace of the visceral arches appears in the form of head-cavities, rounded cell-tubes between the diverticula of the gut, which afterwards form the gill-clefts. The question of correspondence between the head-cavities and the dorsal myotomes is left for a future period. There is a difference between the embryonic gill arches of Petromyzon and those 272, J. T. CUNNINGHAM. of Elasmobranchs in the position of the original vessel of the arch. This vessel in the latter forms lies near the outer bor- der of the arch; in Petromyzon it lies as near as possible to the inner surface. The arch elongates and becomes flattened antero-posteriorly ; the muscle-tube undergoes a correspond- ing compression. The cartilaginous arch arises anterior to the muscle-tube, but soon divides this tube in the middle of the arch completely, separating an adductor on the inner side from a constrictor on the outer, as in Selachians, The cells of the anterior wall of the muscle-tube have a remarkable peculiarity. They persist, in embryonic form, as long tubes, which run the whole length of the arch, and show a transverse striation only on the exterior. All the muscles run the whole length of the arch and unite, dorsally as well as ventrally, with those of the other side ; the important point about this is that if the carti- laginous rods were to disappear the condition would be the same as that which actually exists in Myxine. The chief dif- ference between the gill lamine of the adult Petromyzon and those of Selachians is that the former are directed towards the exterior, the latter towards the interior, and this difference appears at their first origin in the embryo. It is probable that the adductors serve as inspiratory muscles by lifting up the ventral side of the branchial region, and so expanding the branchial cavities, while the constrictors are expiratory, their contraction driving the water out. Thus it is shown that the branchial skeleton of Petromyzon is composed of true cartilaginous branchial arches. It is true that these arches in the Cyclostomata are not segmented, nor are they in the Teleostean ; and this shows that Petromyzon is derived from a form more premature than the Selachian, in which the segmentation had not yet occurred. The same truth is indicated by the homology of the hypophysis with the nasal duct, an homology which, as Dohrn frankly acknowledges, was first asserted by Goette in his ‘Entwicklung der Unke.’ Petromyzon must have branched off from a condition in which the hypophysis was still an independent preoral pair of gill- clefts. That the gills of Petromyzon are homologous with EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 273 those of Selachians has been suggested by Huxley and P. Fiirbringer, and is by Dohrn’s results fully established. Myxine is a further modification of Petromyzon, and shows a remnant of the branchial skeleton in the cartilage of its ductus cesophageo-cutaneus. The internal position of the branchial artery in the embryo Petromyzon is simply explicable as a consequence of the displacement of the branchial lamelle to- wards the interior, and this change of position has been brought about by the necessity of protecting the gills which arose when the present habits of the animal (either burrowing in mud or attaching itself to other animals) were acquired.! Thus the theory that the branchial cartilages of Petromyzon represent an archaic system not elsewhere present except in the extra branchial cartilages of Selachians falls to the ground, and with it disappear the consequences which Gegenbaur formerly deduced from it. The Cyclostomata had no jaws it was said because their ancestors had no true gill arches from which jaws might be derived, whereas the truth is probably they have lost the jaws through the conversion of the biting 1 In my paper on Myxine, in the previous number of this Journal, I have described the habits of Myxine from actual observation. There can be no doubt that during far the greater portion of its time the animal lies motion- less, buried in mud, with only the extremity of its snout protruding. In this condition the method of respiration, unique among fishes, namely, the constant passage of a current of water through the nostril to the gill-pouches, is the only method possible. Doubtless this method is also the most convenient when the animal is boring into the body of a fish, or when its whole body has penetrated into the flesh of its prey; and it is difficult to say which of its habits, burrowing or boring into its prey, was the prior cause in producing the existing condition of the respiratory organs. I have not yet ascertained whether the respiratory current is maintained by ciliary action, or by internal muscular action, or by both combined. No muscular respiratory movements are visible externally. Ammoccetes, it is true, burrows, although it has a branchial skeleton; and I do not know how the Ammoccetes, when buried, can carry on the method of respiration which is seen in Petromyzon. Petro- myzon never burrows, it conceals itself beneath stones and in crevices, but it could not take in water by all its branchial apertures as it does unless it were surrounded by water free from sediment. The comparison of the habits of Petromyzon and Myxine illustrates the diversity of functions performed by 274, Jj. T. CUNNINGHAM. into a sucking mouth. It was said that they had no lhmbs because the skeleton of a limb was derived from an arch of the branchial skeleton, and no true branchial arches were present; the truth is that the limbs are not derived from branchial arches, as is now generally acknowledged, and there is a rudiment of the pelvic fin in Petromyzon, to be after- wards described. The Origin of the Fins of Fishes. The true history of the origin of the limbs of fishes, paired and unpaired fins, as Dohrn reads it, is set forth in the sixth Study. Inthe original ancestral condition the Vertebrate body was similar in most respects to that of an Annelid. The medul- lary tube was an open plate, the intestine extended through the whole length of the body to a terminal anus, and on each segment were two pairs of appendages, processes of the body wall provided with processes of the body musculature, in fact, dorsal and ventral parapodia. The nerve plate was, of course, ventral, when the animal was reversed in position and the plate folded into a tube, the two series of ventral parapodia were brought together in the median dorsal line and coalesced both laterally and longitudinally, forming the dorsal fin, which was originally continuous along the whole length of the body. Another change which took place was that a new anus was formed out of the fusion of two gill-slits, and in consequence one organ, and the contrast between the functions of homologous organs in two forms. An important function of the sucker-mouth of Petromyzon is to adhere to stones in the bed of a river, and without this power the animal would immediately lose control of its own movements, and be carried away at the mercy of the currents in which it habitually lives. This function is entirely wanting in Myxine, whose mouth is not truly a sucker at all, but a boring apparatus, I have never seen a Myxine use its mouth to attach itself, while Petromyzon never leaves its mouth attachment at one place, except to immediately secure it again at another. Yet the mouth of Myxine can take in food without boring, as is demonstrated every day in the North Sea when the fisherman finds on his lines numbers of Myxine which have taken the baited hook far down into the intestine without using their teeth upon the bait at all. EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 275 the postanal gut disappeared ; the degeneration of the postanal gut is actually repeated in ontogeny. The contraction of the ventral part of the tail thus brought about caused the series of dorsal parapodia behind the anus to coalesce in the same manner as the ventral parapodia, and thus the median anal fin was produced. The przanal dorsal parapodia were never approxi- mated laterally, but partly disappeared, partly coalesced longi- tudinally to form the existing pelvic and pectoral fins. The fins therefore have nothing to do with gills, either in the way supposed in Gegenbaur’s Archipterygium theory, or in the way originally suggested by Dohrn in the ‘ Ursprung der Wirbelthiere. In the theory now taught by Dohrn the metameric external gills of Annelids are left out of considera- tion; the ancestor, it is to be presumed, had none. The facts on which the theory is based, and which are important results of investigation however explained, are as follows :—The mus- culature of the pectoral fin is derived in embryos of Elasmo- branchs (Pristiurus) from a series of muscle buds separated from the ventral end of each myotome. Each bud divides into four pieces, two above and two below. The same is true of the pelvic fin. That these fins cannot be serially homo- logous with any parts of the gill arches is proved by the fact that the musculature of the gill arches is derived from the head cavities, and these are ventral to the myotomes. So also the gill cartilages are not homodynamous (serially homologous) with the ribs, for the ribs are between the myotomes, the series of which is continued anteriorly above the gill arches. A large number of myotomes contribute to form each fin. Behind the anus on each side muscle buds are given off from the ventral ends of the myotomes ; these are serially homologous with those already described, and in all probability, although the transformation was not traced, they form the musculature of the anal fin. The musculature of the dorsal fins arises from buds given off dorsally exactly as those belonging to the paired fins are given off ventrally. The fin rays in the dorsal fins arise as median cartilaginous rays, at first quite unconnected with any other part of the skeletou. One would have expected 276 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. to find, if the theory be true, that these rays were originally double ; but Dohrn says nothing of this difficulty, attaching the greatest importance to the musculature. It has been objected to Dohrn’s theory by myself and Professor Carl Vogt that in Teleos- tean embryosthere is a preanal median fin in addition to the pre- anal paired fins ; to which Dohrn has replied that it has not been proved that this fin has any musculature, and therefore it is pro- bably a new development peculiar to the class in which it occurs. Morphology of the Mandibular and Hyoid Arches of Selachians. We come next to a discussion of one of the most compli- cated chapters in Vertebrate morphology, the question of the mandibular and hyoid arches in Selachians. We will take a rapid survey of the facts as they exist according to Dohrn’s investigations, and then consider the deductions he draws from them. In embryos of Pristiurus, Scyllium, Mustelus, Centrina, Torpedo, and Raja the conus arteriosus at its terminal bifurcation forms the hyoid arteries, the arteries of the hyoid arch. From each of these arteries near its origin arises another artery which runs parallel to and anterior to the hyoid artery. Between the bases of these two lies the thyroid gland, and the arteries are to be called the thyroid arteries. The hyoid artery supplies only one series of branchial laminz, the posterior. There is also but one branchial hyoid vein, the posterior. There is only one venous commissure from the hyoid vein instead of two as in the posterior arches, and this commissure opens into the thyroid artery. The art. thyroidea has hitherto been called the art. mandibularis. The thyroid artery, after receiving the venous commissure, is continued into the spiracular artery. The hyoid vein divides dorsally into two branches, one of which runs back and joins the dorsa] aorta system, the other runs forward as the carotis posterior, joins for a short distance behind the hypophysis with the same vein of the other side, then separates running one each side of the hypophysis, the vein of each side receiving a large vein from the spiracular gill. EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 207 The musculature of the hyoid arch is peculiar in this respect, that no internal portion of the muscle-tube is segmented off by the cartilage, and accordingly no adductor is formed. The musculi interarcuales are also absent, and there is a complicated system of ligaments fastening the hyomandibular cartilage. The ventral muscles, on the other hand, are similar to those of the posterior arches. With regard to the cartilage of the hyoid arch, development shows that in the Sharks the upper middle internode, dorsal to the venous commissure forms the hyomandibular, no separate basale or dorsal internode is formed; but, as the hyomandi- bular carries a number of branchial cartilage rays, and also a dorsal ray, which is homodynamous with the upper extra- branchial (so-called) cartilage of the gill arches, it follows that the hyomandibular contains the basale (dorsal internode) of the hyoid arch. In the Sharks the first rudiment of the mandibular arch appears at the level where the hyoid vein joins the spiracular artery, but unlike the posterior rudiments it consists from the first of two cartilaginous centres: the under becomes the mandible, the upper the upper jaw, the so-called palato-quad- rate. No adductor is formed in the mandibular arch. It has been generally taught that the masticatory muscle of the jaws is the homologue of the adductor, but this is not so; no homo- logue of the adductor is present. There are no cartilaginous rays on the mandibular arch. The doctrine, therefore, of Gegenbauer and his followers, that the lower and upper jaw are parts of a single cartilage arch equivalent to a posterior gill arch is unfounded. In the Rays the development of the cartilages of the hyoid arch is quite different to that described for the Sharks. There are two cartilage-centres, one near the posterior edge of the arch, the other near the anterior side, behind the spira- cular cleft; each cartilage has its own muscle system. The first cartilage is separated into a dorsal and ventral part by the venous commissure, and each part bears gill rays. The second cartilage becomes the hyomandibular, it has its own muscle 278 j. T. CUNNINGHAM. system which forms the mus. levator. The conclusion which must be drawn is that the hyomandibular in the Rays is a remnant of an arch anterior to and entirely distinct from the hyoid arch, while in the Sharks the dorsal part of the hyoid arch with its raysis fused with the hyomandibular. According to Gegenbaur the hyomandibular in the Rays represents only the mandibular process of the hyomandibular of the Sharks ; if this were true there would be no rays dorsal to the venous commissure in the Rays, whereas the fact is that these dorsal rays exist, but the cartilage they belong to is separate from the hyomandibular. Dohrn finally suggests that the upper jaw is also an independent gill arch, and the mandible another, but for the present leaves the further tracing of the transfor- mations for more profound investigations. He concludes the section on the hyoid arch in the Rays with the remark that he is satisfied to dispel the illusion that we already know what we want to ascertain. The spiracular cartilage is next taken in hand. Dohrn has investigated its origin in Scyllium canicula and catulus, Pris- tiurus, Mustelus, Raja and Torpedo. He found it always a single cartilage, and states that there is no foundation for the theory that it is either an enlarged single ray, or a combina- tion of rays. It is probably a portion of an independent arch, but what relation this arch bears to others it is at present impossible to say. ‘The adductor mandibulz is developed from the whole of the walls of the mandibular head cavity, no portion being separated off as an adductor; only one differen- tiation of a portion occurs, namely, the formation of the levator maxille superioris from the part lying nearest to the spiracle. When it has been postulated that the hyoid arch is really double and contains two arches fused together, it becomes necessary to inquire what has become of the cleft originally existing between these two arches. Has the cleft disappeared without leaving a trace, or has it merely undergone a meta- morphosis? Dohrn answers that the pair of clefts, i.e. the endodermal parts of them, have united in the median ventral line and formed the thyroid gland. This organ arises in the EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE OHORDATA. 279 embryo in the middle line very far forward as an outgrowth of endoderm cells close behind the mouth, and subsequently passes backwards losing its connection with the pharynx. In a note Dohrn promises in a future study to discuss the spira- cular cleft of the Selachians and Ganoids, and the pseudobranch of Teleosteans, and to show that between the mandible and the hyoid in Teleostean embryos on each side a deep invagina- tion of the ectoderm occurs, which is to be regarded as the ectodermal part of the cleft represented by the thyroid. (It is probable that this invagination is the same as that observed by other embryologists and diagnosed as the Teleostean represen- tative of the spiracle.) In another note it is stated that evidence will at a future time be adduced to show that in the jaw and hyoid system of Teleosteans five independent visceral arches are combined : 1, upper jaw; 2, lower jaw; 3, spiracular cartilage ; 4, hyomandibular ; 5, hyoid. The Thyroid of Petromyzon. The subject discussed in Study VIII is the thyroid in Petromyzon and its homologue in Amphioxus and the Tuni- cata. In the larval Ammoceetes the first trace of the thyroid appears at the time when the most anterior branchial diver- ticula of the endoderm grow out. Its first rudiment is a diverticulum directed downwards and somewhat forwards, close beneath the median part of the first pair of branchial diver- ticula, which is homologous with the spiracular clefts of Sela- chians and the pseudobranchize of Teleosteans. Between the stomodzum and enteron on each side runs the most anterior branchial artery, homologous with the spiracular artery of the Selachians ; it opens into the cephalic aorta of its own side, Petromyzon possessing two cephalic aorta one on each side of the notochord. The growth backwards of the mesoderm of the velum causes the opening of the thyroid diverticulum to be pushed farther back, so that it soon comes to lie at the level of the second pair of branchial sacs, and later between the second and third. A sagittal ingrowth of mesoderm now divides the thyroid anteriorly into two halves. On each side another 280 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. pushing in forms the glandular lamella, the uninvaginated part forming the cover-lamella. In the glandular lamella a differ- entiation takes places into conical masses of gland-cells, the apex of the cone turned to the cavity of the gland, and ordinary ciliated cells. In the advanced larva of Ammoceetes two ciliated grooves run transversely in the wall of the pharynx, in front of the gill-sacs, and converge on the median ventral line to meet in the opening of the thyroid. These grooves Dohrn has ascertained to be derived from the endo- dermal sacs which represent the spiracular clefts, and which in Ammoceetes never acquire an opening to the exterior. Now the endostyle or hypobranchial groove of Ascidians, e.g. Cione intestinalis or Salpa, is closely similar in histo- logical structure to the thyroid of Ammoceetes. There is the same differentiation into bulbous agglomerations of gland- cells, and a more even layer of ciliated cells. Moreover, in the Ascidian there is a pair of ciliated grooves immediately behind the mouth, which ventrally converge to the hypobranchial groove, dorsally to the ciliated pit (hypophysis). These grooves of the Ascidian must be homologous with those of Ammoceetes, and must therefore represent in the Ascidian the spiracular clefts. And it follows that Tunicates must be derived from fishes, not vice versa. The reason suggested for the transformation is that the thyroid and spiracular clefts have been converted into mucous-secreting organs to aid in the conveyance of nourishment to the cesophagus. In Amphioxus there is not a hypobranchial groove, but a hypobranchial ridge, but this ridge has the same histological character as the thyroid in Ammoccetes and the hypobranchial groove in Ascidians. A homologue of the peripharyngeal ciliated grooves is not mentioned as occurring in Amphioxus, and the development of the hypobranchial ridge has not been studied. The conclusion drawn from all this is that both Tunicates and Amphioxus are degenerate fishes derived from ancestors more or less similar to the Cyclostomata. A difficulty which arises in considering Dohrn’s arguments is that no reason 1s EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA. 281 given why the spiracular endoderm sac should open into the thyroid endoderm sac, since these were presumably originally separate; the spiracle being anterior to the hyomandibular, the thyroid between hyomandibular and hyoid. Dohrn does not mention this question, being satisfied so far to show that the condition of the ciliated grooves in Tunicates is directly derivable from the condition in Ammoccetes. The derivation of the arrangement in the latter from that in Selachians is not discussed. Rudiments of Paired Fins in Petromyzon. In the ninth Study Dohrn returns again to the question of the fins. How, he demands, could an animal of the size and complication of the Cyclostomata obtain for itself organs of such fundamental effect on the whole organisation as pectoral and pelvic fins ? The question is perhaps not so convincing as he thinks ; for, on his own hypothesis, the neural and ventral para- podia must at one time have arisen, and the theory of the evo- lution of organs is not at present in such a state as to make it any more easy to understand how these organs arose than how limbs could arise in the Cyclostome, unless, indeed, it were postulated that the segmented vertebrate ancestor, with its dorsal and ventral parapodia, was a creation into whose pre- vious origin it were impious to inquire. But what is more to the point is that, although Gegenbaur believed no rudiment of fins could be discovered in the Cyclostomata, Dohrn has dis- covered in Ammoccetes rudiments of muscle-buds similar to those which in other fishes form the muscles of the unpaired fins. These buds, however, remain as indifferent cells during the Ammoceetes stage, and are only differentiated into the fin muscles when the metamorphosis into Petromyzon takes place. The buds are given off ventrally as well as dorsally, and as the dorsal series forms the muscles of the dorsal fin, the przanal ventral ones must at one time have formed mus- cles of then existing paired fins. Moreover, there is, accord- ing to Dohrn, a rudiment of the pelvic fins in Petromyzon, namely, the longitudinal folds bordering the anus, Below 282 J. T. CUNNINGHAM. these folds are a pair of muscles, called by Schneider, in his ‘ Beitrage zur vergl. Anatomie der Wirbelthiere,’ the anal fin muscles. According to Dohrn, these muscles serve to pro- trude the so-called penis of the male Lamprey. Dohrn raises the question of the possibility of copulation in the Lamprey, a possibility which does not really exist, for in the female there is a protrusible tube at the abdominal pore, which is shorter but otherwise exactly similar to that of the male. Dohrn suggests that the anal fin muscles of Schneider are homologous with the muscles of the pelvic fin in other fishes (Selachians especially). Origin of the Vertebrate Paired Eyes. The most recent study deals with the embryology and phy- logeny of the Vertebrate eye. It was obvious to previous embryologists that the nervous part of the eye was originally in the wall of the brain. Lankester suggested that the an- cestor was at this time transparent, while Balfour believed that though the tissues may have been transparent, the original cause of the outgrowth of the optic vesicle was the covering of the original superficial eye by the formation of the medullary tube. But the starting-point of Dohrn’s inquiry is the deve- lopment of the eye-muscles. Balfour indicated briefly the origin of these muscles from the most anterior head-cavity. Marshall (this Journal, vol. xxi) ascertained that only the rectus internus superior, inferior, and obliquus inferior arose from the pre-mandibular cavity, while the obliquus superior arose from the mandibular, the rectus externus from the hyoid. But Marshall believed that the dorsal parts of the head cavities from which the eye-muscles were formed were homologous with myotomes, and not with the ventral celom in the trunk. Dohrn does not agree with this, and holds that the dorsal parts, like the ventral, are not homologous with the myotomes in the trunk, but only with the ventral walls of the body cavity. As a consequence of this it follows that the eye- muscles are true muscles of visceral arches, and must have been originally branchial muscles. The reason why branchial EVOLUTION OF ORGANS IN THE CHORDATA, 283 muscles came into relation with the eye is that the light reached the latter, when the medullary tube began to close, through the ectodermal pit of a preoral gill-cleft. This ecto- dermal branchial pit is now the lens of the eye, whose peculiar mode of formation is thus explained. The vascular part of the same gill arch is retained in the choroid gland of Teleosteans, which receives its blood supply from the pseudobranchial vein, and the arteria centralis retinee, which is the efferent artery of the lens branchia. This hypothesis explains the vessels of the campanula Halleri, of the pecten of Reptiles and Birds, the em- bryonic lens vessels of Mammals, as remnants of the blood- vessels of the branchia represented by the lens. Leaving the eye, Dohrn next goes on to support his view that aimost the whole of the head except the brain represents visceral or ven- tral structures, just as the tail contains only dorsal structures, and asserts his belief that attempts to estimate the number of myotomes in the head are all in vain. In his opinion the cerebral nerves have lost those branches which innervated myotomes and their derivatives, and have, in consequence of the extraordinary enlargement and complication of the ventral region, increased to a corresponding degree their visceral branches, at the same time having undergone great alterations in distribution on account of the changes of relative position among the gill arches. Thus, the attempts of Van Wighe and others to diagnose dorsal branches of the cranial nerves are founded in mistaken views. A ramus dorsalis of a spinal nerve never innervates a mucous tube, any more than the ramus dorsalis, so called, of a cranial nerve innervates myotomes and muscles of a dorsal fin. Again, Dohrn points out how necessary it is to understand more accurately the anatomy and develop- ment of the vertebrate organs before constructing complete and simple schemes which reduce the head to a number of myotomes as formerly to a certain number of vertebre. A great anatomist once said that if he wished to read romances he knew better specimens than histories of creation where- with to amuse himself, 4 propos of which Dohrn points out that if phylogenies are to be compared with romances it is as VOL, XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER, U 284. J. T. CUNNINGHAM. well to remember that the most sensational are not always the best works of art. We have thus given a summary of Dohrn’s results and indi- cated the point of view from which he regards the problem of vertebrate phylogeny. The speculations formulated in the ‘Ursprung der Wirbelthiere’ have been in some cases sup- ported in others overthrown by his later researches, but he still holds strongly to the fundamental thesis that the original ancestor was a segmented animal more or less similar to an Annelid, and that the organisation of Cyclostomata, Amphioxus, and Tunicata can only be explained by profound degeneration. Whatever the fate of his various theories may be in the future of morphology, it is certain that his studies form a massive contribution to the really scientific study of organogeny, and that his independent attitude and stimulating suggestiveness of thought are worthy of his favorite motto, ‘“‘ Was fruchtbar ist allein ist wahr.” REVIEW. Patten on the Eyes of Molluscs and Arthropods. In the last number of the ‘ Mittheilungen’ of the Zoological Station of Naples appears an extensive article by Dr. William Patten on the “ Eyes of Molluscs and Arthropods.” The article contains the record of a number of observations on the structure of the eye in these animals, which appear to be of considerable value and importance. Accompanying the record of facts is a variety of theoretical and speculative statements, which are so extraor- dinary as not only to call for special notice, but are even likely to lead some readers to underestimate the value of the observations. Indeed, the attitude taken by this young and inexperienced naturalist in criticising the work of his predecessors, and in the enunciation of astounding general propositions, of the eccentricity and inadmissibility of which he appears to be altogether uncon- scious, is one which is greatly to be regretted as likely to diminish the weight which would otherwise be attached to his statements of fact, obviously the outcome of industrious investigation. A large portion of the memoir deals with the eyes of Mollusca, of which we shall not here say anything further. The most im- portant new result recorded in the memoir is that relating to the essential structure of the compound eyeof Arthropoda. Dr. Patten appears to have discovered that Grenacher is wrong in supposing that the cells of the crystalline cones are the matrix cells of the corneal lenses. He has found a distinct layer of epidermic matrix cells, which produce the cuticular lenses, and were entirely missed by Grenacher. This new layer is therefore the equivalent of the vitreous layer of the monomeniscous Arthropod eye. The crystalline cone cells are, on the other hand, according to Patten, part of the retinal apparatus, and the rhabdom of Grenacher, which forms a sort of stalk to the group of crystalline cone cells, is really formed by them, and is not a cuticular product of the retinula cells of Grenacher, which surround it, and, according to that observer, produce it. Dr. Patten’s observations on these points require con- firmation, but appear to be likely to prove correct. As to nerve- endings, his observations are more doubtful, since he has committed himself in a somewhat over-confident manner to a series of specula- tive generalisations on the subject of nerve-endings, for the formu- lation of which it is only too obvious that neither his knowledge of facts nor his acquaintance with the work of contemporary histolo- gists qualify him. He objects altogether to the term “nerve-end cell,” and holds that all the cells of the Arthropod ommateum are sup- plied with nerve-fibres, the chief of which are those which, according 286 REVIEW. to him, form a meshwork in the crystalline cone cells, being derived from an axial nerve-fibre, which runs up the rhabdom in order to spread itself out in those cells. It certainly cannot be at once ad- mitted that the fibres which Patten has thus traced in so many directions are nerve-fibres, though possibly they are so. On the other hand, contrary to his assertions in reference to the Arthropod eye, Patten lays down the law in a dogmatic fashion in regard to the Molluscan hypodermis. “The nerves,” he says, “must termi- nate between the cells, and probably extend to their very outer ends.’ The “must’’ of the foregoing assertion depends on the cor- rectness of a speculative account of the phylogenetic development of a nervous system, for many of the details of which Dr. Patten has no conclusive grounds to urge. At present, it may be remarked, histologists have been led, by the observations of Ranvier and others, to admit that nerve-fibres do in some regions terminate between the cells of the epidermis of Vertebrata, but it is also very generally held that nerve-fibres of organs of special sense terminate in the substance of special nerve-end cells. Dr. Patten’s observations are possibly correct, but he does not strengthen the confidence likely to be placed in them by dogmatism of the kind in which he indulges. Our knowledge of the relation of nerve-fibres to nerve-end cells is admittedly very unsatisfactory, and will require observations over aud above those of Dr. Patten to put it on a satisfactory footing. Such being the main facts of importance which Dr. Patten seeks to establish, we may pass to a brief notice of some of his more astonishing theoretical statements. In the course of the extensive memoir (over 200 pages) which Dr, Patten has devoted to this subject, it is very seldom that we find a continuous straightforward and intelligible account of the facts, with a sober discussion of pro- babilities as to matters in which his own observations are im con- flict with those of other observers, or are incomplete. Dr. Patten is continually introducing into his record, with an unbecoming assumption of wisdom and authority, speculations or statements of a theoretical nature, which are so extravagant and betray so much ignorance as to make the reader regret very heartily that they have been allowed to disfigure a treatise which must on other grounds command attention. For instance:—1l. On p. 625 the description of the eye of Penzus is introduced with the following utterance :—‘“‘ The great impetus that modern zoological science has received from comparative anatomy has not been due so much to more subtle or able comparisons as to a more perfect knowledge of the structure of single forms.” How there is to be comparative anatomy without comparison, or how comparison is to proceed without an increased knowledge of the single forms compared, is not explained by Dr. Patten. The sentence, so far as it means any- thing, appears to be a negation of the value of scientific morphology altogether. This, however, is a trifle compared with what follows, REVIEW. 287 and we quote it merely to show Dr. Patten’s appreciation of the scope and tendency of morphological research. 2. A few lines below the passage above quoted we find the follow- ing dictum. ‘“ We must expect a certain amount of structural uniformity in those organs which have to carry by the same means the same forms of energy to similar perceptive centres.” This seems to be almost a truism; if the ‘same means” are employed for such a purpose we certainly must expect uniformity. But what does our author mean by “ carrying the same forms of energy to similar perceptive centres?” He is speaking of the eye; what is the form of energy which he imagines to be carried by means of the eye and optic nerves to a perceptive centre? A perusal of his final chapter explains this paradoxical allusion. Our readers will hardly credit the statement in the first instance, but it is actually true that Dr. Patten supposes that the energy of sunlight is carried with quantitative significance by nerves from the eye to nerve centres. He writes (p. 712): “In plants this sun energy is used in the chlorophyll grains, for in them the production of organic matter takes place. But in animals it is probable that the pigment granules are only the receivers of energy—the heliophags, as we shall call them—while this energy is transmitted by nerve- fibres to centres where it is consumed in the production of proto- plasmic compounds.” ‘This astounding theory of “ heliophags ” is only part of a general theory of ‘“ dynamophagy,’’ which is deve- loped at great length by Dr. Patten in his final chapter. “ Living bodies,” he says, “are distinguished by their power to absorb matter and energy, and from them produce high compounds by whose disintegration force is liberated as motion. This se- quence of events is vitality. .... We have only to deal with the second of these processes, the absorption of energy or dynamo- phagy, and more especially with the absorption of solar energy or heliophagy.”” Eyes then are primarily not organs of sight but heliophags, organs for the absorption of solar energy, and only secondarily acquire a sensory significance! Similarly auditory organs are declared to be absorbers of the energy of sound vibra- tions, whilst “the energy of coarser vibrations, of pressure, contact, or movement ’’ is “‘absorbed” by tactile hairs and “ that of gases, solutions or chemical compounds,” by means of taste-cells! It is thus coolly proposed by Dr. Patten to revolutionise all the established conclusions of modern physiology in regard to the nervous system, of which conclusions he, it is only fair to say, appears to be entirely ignorant. He actualiy imagines that the energy received from external bodies is quantitatively transmitted from the surface of an animal by its nerves to the nerve-centres and there made use of. It is hardly necessary to point out that such a notion is simply preposterous, and that to speak of “ the absorption of energy” as he does, betrays not only a fundamental ignorance of physiology but also of physics. The energy of the nervous 288 REVIEW. system and of the animal body generally, is, it is scarcely necessary to say, taken into the body in the form of potential energy of food-stuffs, and exists there as the potential energy of the proteids or higher chemical combinations which constitute protoplasm. All that the sense organs do in the way of bringing the ‘actual’ energy external to the animal body into relation with the nerve- centres, is to furnish special trains of explosive substance (i.e. of substances whose potential is suddenly convertible into actual energy), so that energy of various forms external to the body is able to initiate at appropriate points, and by means of special apparatus the conversion within the body of potential into actual energy, the amount of which has no relation whatever to the amount of the incident energy by which the explosion was started. Precisely as the energy liberated in a gun barrel is not the energy of the fall of the hammer which explodes the detonator, nor pro- portional to it, so is the energy of the animal body entirely distinct from the energy which sets its various sense organs in operation. The sense organs of the animal body may be compared to the detonating apparatus ; and Dr. Patten might as well tell us that the purpose of a gun’s trigger is to absorb energy and transmit it to the ball, whilst ignoring altogether the gunpowder, as to talk about sense organs being ‘“ dynamophags ” and eyes being “ absor- bers ” of the “ beneficial effects of the sunlight.” 3. In elaborating his doctrine Dr. Patten commits himself to many erronous statements, which show how little he is qualified to deal with the subject. We may notea few of these. Onp. 709 Dr. Patten writes of the “animal pigment, especially that of colourless plastids.” Animal pigment is declared to be “a living sub- stance!” It is further stated, without the slightest attempt to sup- port so startling a conclusion, that the “ pigment granules of animal tissues are modified chlorophyll granules!” Dr. Patten not only expresses new ideas but also has invented a new chemical termino- logy. He writes of “waste products, such as carbonic acid gas, sulphides, ammoniates and ureates.’’ His knowledge of chlorophyll and of the steps by which animal pigment granules are to be derived from chlorophyll granules may be judged of by the following: ‘Chlorophyll, as is well known, is extremely unstable and soluble in many fluids, even in water.” 4, The statement that “it is well known that pigment, like chlo- rophyll, is dependent for its existence upon the sunlight,” is totally at variance with fact. Instances of the formation of chlorophyll in plants which are excluded from sunlight are known, and still more numerous instances of animals which develop brilliant pigment although living in what is relatively to ordinary daylight, darkness. No doubt in the race, pigment must havea direct dependence on the access of sunlight; in the absence of light it cannot be of service to the organism. But there is no evidence to show either that chloro- phyll or pigment are dependent for their existence upon sunlight. REVIEW. 289 5. In green plants, according to Patten, “ chlorophyll is without doubt the substance affected by sunlight,” and ‘the only rational supposition is that pigment is the substance in animals directly affected by the sunlight.”” Itis somewhat impertinent of Dr. Patten to accuse those who may not assent to his crude theories of enter- taining irrational suppositions. Most physiologists will remember that there are not a few simple experiments which demonstrate that protoplasm devoid of pigment is affected by sunlight and by its visible as opposed to its thermal factors. For instance, Engel- mann has shown that the colourless Protozoon Pelomyxa contracts when exposed suddenly to sunlight, and the retina of albinoes is “directly affected ” by sunlight. 6. It is a matter for regret that Dr. Patten has not made himself acquainted with the facts as to the action of light on protoplasm. One of the most important lines of inquiry in the minute study of the eyes of Arthropods, Molluscs, and other Invertebrates, is to be found in an exact determination of the presence or absence of pigment in the nerve-end cells and of the distribution of pigment granules in those cells. The question is a difficult one to investigate, because the observer generally is compelled to dissolve the pigment present in an ommateum before a satisfactory study of the cells can be made. Dr. Patten, in the more valuable portion of his memoir containing the record of his observation, has not given so much attention to this matter as we could wish. It is remarkable that whilst he indulges in such “tall talk’ with regard to pigment and heliophagy and the fundamental relation of pigment to this newly discovered function, yet he himself professes (we do not throw doubt on his observa- tion) to have traced the chief optic nerve-fibres of the Arthropod polymeniscous eye to the colourless transparent cells of the erystal cones. It is evidently a subject which does not trouble him much since he quite recklessly attributes to other authorities on Arthropod eyes, statements with regard to the presence or absence of pigment in nerve-end cells which are the reverse of those made by the gentlemen in question. Thus at p. 670 he says: “‘ Let us take for instance one of the lateral eyes of Scorpio and it will be found, according to Graber and Lankester, that the om- mateum consists of ommatidia each one composed of five central colourless cells or retinophore.” The reader who has followed us so far will not be surprised to learn that the particular cells in question were described and figured by Lankester as pigmented and not colourless, and were made by him the text of a discussion as to the significance of pigment in nerve-erd cells. 7. It is not, however, of any use to expect accuracy of observa- tion as to the contents of books and contemporary memoirs from Dr. Patten. He is far too much engrossed with laying down new principles of physiology and expounding to a benighted world the results of his philosophic meditations. As he himself says (p. 672), since doctors disagree, he intends to choose his own course, picking 290 REVIEW. out such facts as suit his theories and denying the existence of those which do not. It is not to be expected that a writer who openly professes such principles should quote accurately the observations of other people. At the same time this incapacity for accurate observation of books and the neglect to observe at all such books as a text-book of physiology, and one also of physics, must lead Dr. Patten’s reader to consider the possibility that his incapacity for correct observation extends also to other matters. 8. To continue our notes. On p. 685 we read: ‘“ We must admit that the possibility of regarding the phaosphere found in Euscor- pius italicus by Lankester as an aborted nucleus is not so remote as he would have us believe.” Whether the phaosphere can possibly be an aborted nucleus or not may be an open question ; it is but another instance of Patten’s extraordinary inaccuracy when he states that Lankester “ would have us believe’ anything on the subject. The matter was not discussed by Lankester at all. 9. On p. 717, Dr. Patten declares that he often hears “it said of any pigmented spot that it is not an eye, but simply a meaningless collection of pigment,’ and also alludes to “those who believe that pigment is a waste product.” We trust that it is not in the excel- lent Zoological Station of Naples, where Dr. Patten has recently been pursuinghis studies, that he has heard the above quoted remark. Was it made by a fellow student at Trieste or in the laboratory of Leuckart at Leipzig? In any case it seems to be a pity that Dr. Patten should have repeated these disparaging remarks con- cerning pigment spots, because no sensible person attaches any importance to them, and it is scarcely worth while to adduce, as Dr. Patten does, the well-known facts which render them unjustifiable. 10. On p. 716 we find it stated that “an organ most perfectly adapted for the condensation and absorption of the greatest amount of (solar) energy is likewise perfectly constructed for the perception of objects.”” The concentration of light is stated to be the condi- tion essential for the most perfect “ heliophagous organ,” and it is declared that ‘‘ the amount of energy absorbed weuld depend upon the most perfect condensation of light upon a given area.” One surely would expect a writer on the theory of eyes to make himself acquainted with the simpler facts known as to the properties of lenses! But it seems that Dr. Patten has not found time to do this. The rays of light concentrated by a lens are, it is hardly necessary to say, merely those rays which fall upon the surface of the lens. Hence if the mere absorption of the energy of these rays is all that is needed, there is no advantage whatever in the provision of a lens. The naked epidermic surface of an area equal to that of a lens would present a perfect instrument for the “ absorp- tion” of solar energy, and, indeed, would ‘“‘ absorb” more than can the retina with the lens intervening between it and the surrounding medium. In plants accordingly we find no lenses but a simple REVIEW. 291 exposure of green surface to the solar rays. On the other hand if, as is the case according to received theories, the process which goes on in the retina is not important as an absorption or (to use a better term) a conversion of energy quantitatively, but only quali- tatively, that is to say, in respect of initiating active changes in the nerve-end cells with the subsequent consequences of which the amount of energy converted has not so much to do as has its quality, then we can understand that a lens which disposes the solar rays on the retinal surface in a manner conducive to the localisation of their differing quality, has importance and value. 11. A melancholy instance of the extent to which Dr. Patten acts upon the principle of bending facts to theory, even at the risk of the grossest disrespect to contemporary authors of acknowledged competency, is found in his treatment of Sars’s observations on the luminous organs of Euphausia. Patten wishes to consider these organs as eyes, and instances of his hypothetical ‘“ heliophags ;”’ accordingly he suggests that Sars was misled by flashings of reflected light when he stated that they gave out light at intervals. Ina note at the end of Patten’s paper the editor of the ‘ Mittheil- ungen ’ very honestly states that Messrs. Paul Miyer and Giesbrecht have in consequence examined three living specimens of Euphausia, and entirely confirm Sars’s observations and refute the unjust insinuations made by Dr. Patten. 12. A similar unwarrantable adhesion to theory, in the face of opposing facts, is seen in Dr. Patten’s attempt to evade the conse- quences of the observations of Lankester and Bourne on the lateral eyes of Scorpions and Limulus, in regard to the latter of which animals they have the confirmatory evidence of Grenacher. Dr. Patten has propounded a theory of the Arthropod eye, to the effect that itis in all cases derived from a vesicle formed by invagi- nation of the epidermis, and consists, therefore, of three layers of cells, viz. the two layers of the flattened vesicle and the epidermic layer which grows in front of it during its nipping off and detach- ment from the point of invagination. It is probably true that this is the structure and the ancestral! history of the ordinary compound eyes of Crustacea and Insects: but there is no justification in the small area of facts observed by Dr. Patten himself for including all Arthropod eyes, all ocelli wherever situated and however constructed under this type. It is not clear why Dr. Patten insists on the universality of his generalisation, applying it to groups of Arthropods which he knows nothing about, and pre- suming to deny the accuracy of observations which he has not taken the trouble to test. Lankester and Bourne described the ommateum of the lateral eyes of Scorpions as being “ mono- stichous,”’ like the great lateral eyes of Limulus. They figured sec- tions of the lateral eyes of both Kuscorpius italicus and of Androctonus funestus. Their sections are in existence, and leave not the slightest doubt as to the accuracy of the statement VOL. XXVII, PART 2,—NEW SER. x 292 REVIEW. that these lateral eyes consist of simple depressions of the epi- dermis, there being no folding in of the edges of the depression so as to form a vesicle, and consequently no duplication or triplication of the layers. The fact thus established, that there is no vitreous layer in certain Arthropod eyes intervening between the cuticle and the nerve-end cells, naturally enough is an obstacle to Dr. Patten’s sweeping generalisation. After citing the observations in question he dismisses them with the cool remark : “ For theoretical reasons I am obliged to assume that this layer (the vitreous) is always present.” Were Dr, Patten not dominated by theories, one more extrava- gant than another, he would not have “assumed”’ anything about such an important matter, but would simply have taken a Scor- pion (common enough at Naples), and cut some sections of its lateral eyes. Dr. Patten, however, openly professes that he has made it his habit in constructing his views on the structure of eyes to “choose his own course, picking out those facts which seem to point in the right direction ;” that is to say, which support a favourite theory or amplify a startling generalisation, and ignoring or flatly denying, without troubling to bring them to the only test recognised by loyal students of nature, those which cannot be thus used. 18. Finally, we must point out that, in expressing his opinions, Dr. Patten often shows as great a want of manners as of fundamental knowledge. He objects to the supposition that in more complex eyes some of the pigmentiferous cells are due to intrusive connective tissue which has penetrated between the cells of epidermic origin. One author, he states, “has carried this supposition to an absurd degree.’ There is nothing “absurd” in the supposition, as Dr. Patten would recognise were he acquainted with the histology of the epidermis. In Lumbricus, Hirudo, and even in some Verte- brates, the occurrence of such intrusive connective tissue is a de- monstrable and admitted fact; and in relation to the eye of Arthropoda it appears to have been actually observed taking place, according to Kingsley’s recent account of his investigation of the development of the eye of Crangon (‘ Zoolog. Anzeiger,’ No. 234). But in any case it ill becomes a novice to charge his masters and teachers with “ absurdity.’’ It should be enough for him to demon- strate an error (if he can) and to employ respectful language in doing so. Grenacher is subjected by Dr. Patten to even more objectionable treatment. On p.728, this young American, after citing an opinion published by Grenacher, says: “This he knows is absurd, and cannot be true.” The expression is offensive and discreditable. On the whole we cannot congratulate Dr. Dohrn on his con- tributor. There are, no doubt, some laborious observations con- tained in this ill-regulated production ; but it is a question whether their value will counterbalance the effect on the author’s reputation of the evidence which it bears of his want of both scientific and social education. The Anatomy of the Madreporarian Coral Fungia. By Gilbert C. Bourne, B.A., F.L.S., New College, Oxford. With Plates XXIII, XXIV and XXV. DurRinG a visit, extending from the middle of September, 1885, to the middle of January, 1886, to the island of Diego Garcia, an atoll lying in S. lat. 7° 13’, E. long. 72° 23’, I was able to collect and preserve a large number of specimens of Fungia dentata, which form the subject of the present memoir. The Fungize were very abundant within the lagoon, espe- cially among the knolls and banks of growing coral on its east side, where, at low spring tides, they could be collected by scores from depths ranging from three to ten feet. They occur singly, more usually in groups of five or six, among the massive Astreids and Madrepores of which the knolls are chiefly composed, usually lying in a hollow or basin, or half hidden beneath the spreading branches of some large Madre- pora, and are thus protected from being swept away by the tides which set strongly across the knolls. Specimens of a diameter of three inches and more were extremely common, but it was very rarely that I could find any of smaller size; the smallest that I was able to procure measures as much as ‘two inches across, and a prolonged search failed to reward me with a single smaller specimen, or VOL. XXVII, PART 3.—NEW SER. Y 294 GILBERT C. BOURNE. with an example of the nurse-stock.! In this I was very much disappointed, for Professor Moseley succeeded in finding a specimen at Tahiti in the course of a few hours’ search, whilst I was unsuccessful day after day. Although the Fungi at Tahiti lay in only three inches of water, and the search was an easy one, he mentions the great difficulty he had in finding the nurse-mass among the numerous adult forms on the reef ; and in my case, where they lay in three feet or more of water, it is possible that I may have overlooked the small nurse-stock and the smaller recently detached Fungiz; this is the more likely since both the nurse-stocks and the young forms would probably remain hidden beneath the great flat plates of dead Madrepore which form the basis of the mounds of living coral. Yet I can scarcely believe this to be the case, for not only did I search very closely by wading and diving among the corals, but I frequently turned over the above-mentioned flat plates of coral-rock and examined their under surfaces without ever finding a single example, nor did I ever meet with a group of very small forms, nor with anything like the group of nurse- stocks attached to the corallum of an old and dead Fungia, as figured by Stutchbury (39). I am inclined to believe that sexual reproduction followed by asexual reproduction by budding from a nurse-stock takes place in Fungia only at certain seasons of the year, and that it was not in progress during my stay at Diego Garcia. This seems the more probable because I have found no trace either of ova or of spermatozoa in any of the large specimens which I have brought home for examination. Reproduction in Fungia appears to be effected also by budding and by simple fission. In the British Museum there are several examples of the former process, in which indubitable buds can be seen growing from the base of a large Fungia. The buds always arise from 1 Semper (38) calls the nurse-stock of Fungia a Strobila, but as this name was originally applied to the dividing parent-stock of Aurelia, which is essentially different from the bud-producing parent-stock of Fungia, and since it is objectionable to use the same name for two very different phenomena, I use the word nurse-stock for the fixed parent of Fungia. ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 295 the base, and it is not unlikely that they may be formed only when, by some accident, the coral has been overturned. Examples of fission are rare, but I have in my possession a dead corallum which is nearly divided into two separate Fungi, and in which the axial fosses are already completely separated from one another and form mouths excentrically placed on peristomial discs inclined towards one another at a wide angie. There is a similar specimen in the British Museum. In the same collection there is a very good specimen of a nurse-stock brought by H.M.S. Alert from the Seychelles, found on March 5th, 1883. This is a young specimen from which the first bud has not yet been detached, and the soft tissues still extend down over the outside of the corallum to the basal disc ; unfortunately the spirit in which it was con- tained has been allowed to evaporate, and the soft tissues are unfit forexamination. But since it was found only two months later than the date of my search at Diego Garcia and in the Same seas, it may be taken as an objection to my opinion given above, that there is a special season of sexual followed by asexual reproduction from a nurse-stock in Fungia. It is quite possible that sexual reproduction may be very much economised in these corals and is of rare occurrence, the maintenance of the numbers of a species being ensured firstly by the budding off of an indefinite number of forms from the sexually produced nurse-stock, and secondly, by the simple asexual processes of budding and fission above described. The whole history of the reproduction of these forms is very imperfectly understood, although it presents many problems of the greatest interest. A naturalist travelling in coral-seas should not fail to try and secure some specimens of the nurse- stocks carefully preserved in spirit, as well as specimens of the young free forms recently separated from the parent-stock. To this should be added any observations that may be possible on the relative frequency of the nurse-stocks, on the frequency of budding or fission, and on the rate of growth. I was unable to carry out an extended series of observations on the Fungize at Diego Garcia, for the knolls on which they were found lay 296 GILBERT C. BOURNE. “in the lagoon at some distance from my hut, and want of space and appliances prevented me from constructing proper aquaria in which to study them at leisure. Such as I tried to keep alive in buckets and tubs full of sea water soon perished, the water rapidly becoming foul in the hot climate unless a constant stream is kept through it. As for placing any indi- viduals of Fungia or masses of any other coral in a particular spot on the beach where they might be readily accessible for study, a short experience showed me the impracticability of the suggestion. Placed on the lagoonward beech in smooth water they were quickly covered with and destroyed by the sand ; on the external shores they were at once rolled over and over and destroyed by the great waves which are capable of moving masses weighing 2 cwt. and more, and throwing them up in a sort of low wall all round the island. The specimens which I brought home for examination were killed with hot corrosive sublimate, and afterwards treated with picric acid and preserved in 70 per cent. spirit. In this way I was able to preserve several specimens with the short stumpy tentacles fully expanded, as is shown in fig. 1. Although the general features of the corallum of Fungia have been well known for a long time, and have more recently been carefully described by Professor Martin Duncan (5), the arrangement of the soft tissues, and their relation to the corallum has not yet been studied. G. von Koch, it is true, has recently published a few remarks on the subject (23) and gives a figure, but the latter is incorrect in details, and the description merely amounts to a statement that the general anatomy of Fungia corresponds with that of the other Madre- poraria; he does not attempt to give a detailed description of the internal structure. As any attempt to remodel the classi- fication of the Madreporaria must depend on an intimate know- ledge of the relation of the soft parts to the corallum, I shall give in the following pages as detailed a description of the anatomy as circumstances will permit. The family Fungidz was estabiished by Dana in 1846. In his splendidly illustrated work on the ‘ Zoophytes of the ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 297 Wilkes’ Exploring Expedition,’ he gives descriptions of several species, with drawings of the hard parts and the living animals. To the latter I shall have occasion to refer further on. The family thus established was made the subject of a memoir by Milne-Edwards and Haime, in which many new species were described, and the characteristic features of the corallum were noted. The same authors give a full description of the family in the ‘ Histoire des Coralliaires, but confine themselves to the study of the corallum throughout. Professor Martin Duncan has lately published a memoir on the same family, dealing especially with the hard structures, and to his account I have little or nothing to add. The following description of the corallum is taken principally from his paper (5). The corallum is simple and discoidal, the base usually rather concave, and the upper surface convex. The theea is distinct and confined to the basal surface ; it is continuous in the cen- tral part of the disc, but in its more peripheral parts it is per- forated by numerous apertures, which lead through it into the interseptal loculi. The septa are numerous, arranged in seven cycles in the moderately large forms, and are continuous; the free margins of the septa are dentate. The theca is orna- mented with radiating rows of spines, each row corresponding in position with a septum above, and representing a costa. The axial fossa is elongate and shallow. The columella is tra- beculate and rudimentary. Special structures named synap- ticula are characteristic of the Fungidz ; they consist of nearly vertical or curved rows of bars, bridging over the space between and connecting the lower portions of two contiguous septa. By them the lower parts of the interseptal loculi are divided up into nearly vertical channels, bounded on two sides by synapticula, and on the other two by the septa. Excellent figures of the synapticula are given by Professor Duncan. The flat discoid shape of Fungia is not a characteristic of the genus, but occurs in other groups of the Madreporaria, e.g. Deltocyathus among the Turbinolide, Stephano- phyllia and Leptopenus among the Eupsammide. The flat shape is a secondary effect produced by the mode of 298 GILBERT C. BOURNE. growth, for in its youngest stage the corallum of the nurse- stock of Fungia is cup-shaped and resembles a Caryophyllia, having a distinct lateral theca, and a basal disc by which it is attached. In the course of subsequent growth the peristome expands laterally, so that the nurse-stock already shows traces of the discoid shape before any young forms are set free; this is very well seen in the specimen dredged by the “Alert,” re- ferred to above. The separation of the young Fungia from the nurse-stock takes place at a short distance below the edge of the peristome, so that only a small portion of the lateral theca of the nurse-stock passes into the free form. As growth proceeds the peripheral ends of the septa are the seats of the greatest activity in the deposition of calcareous matter, each septum at once growing outwards and sending off calcareous processes from its lower edge, which meet and fuse with those of adjoining septa to form the perforate theca. Thus, the in- crease in size of the coral proceeds almost entirely in a hori- zontal direction, bringing about the discoid shape of the adult. The corallum of a young Fungia just set free from the nurse- stalk has a circular opening beneath, which leads into the interseptal loculi and marks the point of former attachment ; this hole is soon filled up by the deposition of calcareous tissue, which remains as a small boss in the centre of the base of the disc, marking the space which represents the basal disc of the attached coral. The remainder of the under surface isa thecal structure, the more central imperforate part of which is probably that portion of the lateral theca of the nurse-stalk above the line of detachment, the outer and perforate part being derived from a fusion of the lower ends of the septa, and not intimately connected with the synapticula, as I think after a careful examination of the fresh corallum,though on this point I am at variance with Professor Duncan. The series of figures 3—8 show how the discoid shape is derived from the cup- shaped coral by lateral growth. The theca of Fungia, although entirely confined to the basal surface, and perforated by nume- rous apertures leading into the interseptal loculi, is quite homo- logous with the theca of other Madreporaria, and bears similar ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 299 relations to the mesenteries and the ceelenteron, as I shall describe further on. It is important to notice that the theca is formed, in the course of outward growth, from the fused ends of contiguous septa, as is stated by G. von Koch ‘to be the case in the lateral thece of other cup-shaped Madreporaria. I shall use throughout the same terminology as Fowler in in his admirable paper on “‘Coral Anatomy” (9); but since the flattened form of Fungia makes it a little difficult to dis- tinguish “ base” from ‘ basal disc” in a general description, I shall make use of the terms ‘oral surface”? and “ aboral surface,” the former including the mouth and peristome, the latter the theca and basal disc. Drawings of living Fungiz have been given by Eschscholtz, Quoy and Gaimard, and Dana. ‘The first of these gives a tolerably correct figure, but only four cycles of tentacles are represented, the more peripheral cycles not being noticed. Quoy and Gaimard (33) figure two species of Fungia under the name of Fongies a grosses tentacules (Fungia crassitentaculata). These are remarkable for the great length of the tentacles, which are represented as scattered irregularly over the disc. Milne-Edwards and Haime, not noticing the regular arrangement of the tentacles in Esch- scholtz’s figure, say: ‘‘ Toute la partie supérieure du corps de Vanimal, correspondante a la partie lamellifere du polypier, est garnie des tentacules épais qui ne sont pas groupés en forme de couronne comme chez la plupart des Zoanthaires.” Dana’s figure of Fungia lacera in the ‘ Zoophytes of the Wilkes’ Exploring Expedition’ is reproduced in his book on ‘ Corals and Coral Islands,’ and he says in the latter work: “ The ten- tacles are scattered over the disc instead of being arranged in regular circles. It is evident from the figure that the appa- rent circles, where there is more than one, in Actiniz, arise from the crowding of the series of tentacles together, and also that the inner row of tentacles in polyps is the older. It will be noticed also that each of the tentacles stands where a new ridge or calcareous septum in the coral begins.” That the 300 GILBERT C. BOURNE. circles of tentacles in Actinic do not arise in the manner here suggested is sufficiently proved by the researches of Lacaze Duthiers and the Hertwigs, but I have not seen it contradicted of Fungia that the tentacles are scattered irregularly over the disc. Yet so far is this from being the case, that on first taking the living animal out of the sea I was immediately struck with the arrangement of the tentacles in definite cycles. Fig. 1 is a drawing of F. dentata, somewhat contracted by spirit, but with the short stumpy tentacles still expanded. Their arrangement will be at once understood by a comparison of the drawing with the diagram (fig. 2). Each tentacle is placed, not, as Dana says, on the innermost extremity of each septum, but on a slight elevation of the upper edge of each septum near its innermost extremity ; from the point of attachment of the tentacle the septum is con- tinued obliquely downwards and inwards towards the axial fossa, none but the last two cycles ending at any great dis- tance from it. Since the tentacles correspond exactly in position with the septa, what is stated of the arrangement of the one holds equally good of the other. There are twelve primary septa, of which ten reach the mouth, two being rather shorter than the others and placed opposite each end of the long axis of the mouth. The ten- tacles placed on the inner extremities of these septa overhang the mouth, but are small and degenerate. Both Lacaze Duthiers (7) and von Koch (21) describe twelve septa as rising simultaneously in the first cycle, making the prime number of septa twelve instead of six. According to the latter six alternate septa grow faster than the others, giving the appearance of two cycles of six each; this is appa- rently not the case in Fungia whose twelve septa of the first order are, with the exception above mentioned, of equal size. There are twelve septa of the second order alternating with those of the first ; they reach very nearly to the mouth and are all of equal length; the tentacles corresponding with them form, with those of the first cycle, a ring surrounding the mouth. ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 301 There are twelve pairs of septa of the third order. Each pair of this order embraces a septum of the first order. The fourth order contains twenty-four pairs of septa, each pair embracing alternately a septum of the first and a septum of the second order. The fifth and sixth orders also contain twenty-four pairs of septa each. Those of the fifth order are the longer, and each pair embraces a septum of the first and second orders alter- nately ; those of the sixth order are much shorter, and each pair embraces a septum of the third order. These last two orders, the fifth and sixth, very possibly represent only one complete cycle of septa and tentacles. But since the difference in the length of the septa shows a differ- ence in their time of origin I have thought it better to keep them separate. The seventh order contains ninety-six pairs of septa, with their corresponding tentacles. The septa are extremely short and rudimentary ; the tentacles are minute and placed close to the circumference of the disc. The sequence of the septa is 1, 7, 5, 7, 4, 7, Beni, OF i eth Oy 0 Ay F530; V5) 05 1, O05 05 45,05 system. The tentacles are arranged in six tolerably definite circles at different distances from the mouth, as may be seen in figs. 1 and 2. The arrangement both of tentacles and septa is very regular and easily made out at each end of the long axis of the mouth, but it becomes more irregular and obscure at the sides. Thus, contrary to previous statements, Fungia is perfectly regular, and agrees with other Madreporaria in the arrange- ment of tentacles and septa. The tentacles, which are small and club shaped in most species, are correctly figured by Dana. The remaining external features do not call for special notice and may be understood by reference to fig. 1. To examine the internal structure, I decalcified some speci- mens in nitric acid solution, and afterwards stained and cut sections from them in the usual way. Another specimen I half decalcified and dissected, and further made use of the Gifeoncte Os te 5, 7, 1; in each 302 GILBERT C. BOURNE. method invented by G. von Koch, to study the relations of the hard and soft parts in situ. This method, which is described in the ‘ Proceedings of the Zoological Society,’ 1880, p. 41, yields valuable results with smaller corals, but requires con- siderable experience, and is not wholly satisfactory when so large a coral as Fungia is dealt with. Von Koch, in a sbort note on the anatomy of Fungia and other Madreporaria, published in the beginning of this year, rightly says that its structure is essentially the same as that of other Madreporaria, but he makes no mention of the peculi- arities which obtain from the relation of the soft parts to the synapticula, and his diagram is incorrect in some particulars (23). The Mesenteries.—It is obvious that, since the lower parts of the interseptal loculi are broken up by synapticula, there must be some corresponding modification of structure in the mesenteries, if the latter structures are present in Fungia. Professor Duncan was so much struck with this in his studies on the corallum that he was led to express a doubt whether mesenteries could exist at all (5). Transverse sections show that mesenteries do exist, and that in all their essential charac- ters they have the arrangement typical of Hexactinian Actinaria. They are arranged in pairs, each pair being dis- tinguished by the arrangement of its longitudinal muscle-fibres, which are placed on the adjacent faces of the two mesenteries composing the pair, except in the case of the two pairs of directive mesenteries, one pair at each end of the long axis of the mouth, in which the longitudinal muscle-fibres are placed on the reverse sides. The space included between each pair of mesenteries is an entocele (Fowler, 9) and in each entocele there is a septum. There are seven orders of mesenteries in the Fungia which I am describing, corresponding to the seven orders of septa. The primary and secondary mesenteries are attached to the stomodzeum, and in their upper parts traverse the whole space from the mouth to the periphery of the disc. The tertiaries are not attached to the stomodzum, but reach nearly to it. ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 803 The remaining orders are of constantly decreasing length, the septenaries being very minute. All the mesenteries are firmly attached by their upper border to the peristome. In the upper portions of the interseptal loculi there are no synapticula; here the mesenteries are free to radiate across the whole space between the mouth and the periphery of the disc, and show in this part the ordinary structure, viz. a central structureless supporting lamina, the Mesoglea,! bearing a layer of endoderm on each face. On one face are borne the longitudinal, or retractor muscles, bundles of stout muscular fibres developed from the endoderm, supported by and appear- ing as if intimately connected with, supporting offsets of the mesogloea. On the opposite side to the longitudinal muscles are the transverse muscle-fibres, much more feebly developed than the former, and having a general arrangement at right angles to them ; they are not easy to see in Fungia. In the lower portions of the interseptal loculi the continuity of the mesenteries is broken by the synapticula, and they present special modifications of structure which can only be understood by a careful comparison of figs. 10, 13, and 15. Fig. 10 represents a mesentery of the third order dissected out from a decalcified specimen, and viewed from the side. The upper portion is seen to be complete, and exhibits the charac- teristic arrangement of muscle-fibres, but it will be noticed the longitudinal muscles are gathered into more distinct bundles than is usually the case in Actinaria. Each face is covered with a layer of endoderm, as may be seen by reference to figs. 13 and 15. The lower portion of the mesentery is necessarily discontinuous owing to the intervention of the synapticula. Here the mesogloea is seen to be continued into a number of strong bands or ligaments to which the separate bundles of longitudinal muscles are attached, these ligaments passing down through the intersynapticular spaces to be fastened, 1 [ have coined this term as a substitute for the term ‘‘ mesoderm ” in the Ceelenterata, and use it as the equivalent of the “‘ Stiitzlamelle ” or ‘“ Gallert- substanz”’ of German authors, for reasons which are stated at the end of the paper. 304, GILBERT C. BOURNE. according to their position, either to the aboral body wall, or to thickened lines of the mesoglea of the skeletotrophic invest- ment shortly to be described. In sections these ligaments may be seen as thickenings of the tissue surrounding each in- tersynapticular passage, more rarely as complete partitions dividing such a chamber intwo. The endoderm covering each face of the mesentery becomes continuous, where the latter is divided by the synapticulum, with the endoderm of the skeleto- trophic investment. The theca being perforate in all but its most central portions, the ligaments of the mesenteries pass through the perforations and are continued outside the theca, to be fastened to the aboral body wall (see fig. 15). The theca or aboral surface of Fungia is completely covered with soft tissues which do not closely invest the corallum, but are separated from the latter by a portion of the cclenteron. It is important to observe that this extra-thecal portion of the ceelenteron is, partially at least, divided into chambers by mesen- teries in the manner described above. The free edges of the primary and secondary mesenteries below their insertion into the stomodzum, and the free edges of the remaining mesenteries in their entire length, are fur- nished with the thickenings known as mesenterial filaments. In the primaries and secondaries the mesenterial filaments are very thick ; their epithelial cells are very long, attenuated, and crowded close together, showing an abundance of deeply- staining nuclei. Nematocysts are scanty; but I was able to distinguish a number of cells, which seemed to be of the same character as the gland-cells described by the Hertwigs in Actinia and Sagartia (15). In the other mesenteries the fila- ments are not so thick, and gland-cells are less abundant, nematocysts more so; in other respects their structure re- sembles that of the filaments of the primaries and secondaries. At the lower end of the free border of each mesentery is a bundle of much-coiled filaments, forming the structure known as an acontium.’ These structures in Fungia are strictly 1 Professor Moseley has pointed out to me that the name acontium is used by Gosse and the Hertwigs to describe only those structures at the base ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN OCORAL FUNGIA. 305 comparable with the mesenterial filaments, of which they appear to be a continuation. The lower free edge of the me- sentery appears to be prolonged into a long lamellar offset, which is much plicated, and surrounded along its free edge with the thickening which forms the main body of the acon- tium. This thickening has a similar histological structure to that of a mesenterial filament, differing from it only in the larger size of the epithelial cells of which it is composed, in the abundance of nematocysts, and the corresponding poverty of gland-cells. Fowler describes acontia of similar structure in Flabellum patagonichum, and states that they are pro- truded through cinclides in the peristome (9, p.14). Although I handled some hundreds of living Fungia I never saw the acontia protruded, either through the cinclides or through the mouth, but in some species of Mandrina, acontia of exactly similar structure to those above described were protruded through large cinclides on the peristome when the animal was irritated. According to Gosse (11) and the Hertwigs the acontia in Sagartia have the form of bunches of long filaments developed at the lower free edge of each mesentery, each filament being ribbon shaped, with one of its borders much thickened. Such acontia are protruded through cinclides in the body wall. The acontia observed by Fowler and myself are protruded in Fla- bellum and Meandrina through cinclides in the peristome, and appear to be more simple in structure, consisting of a much plicated off-set or prolongation of the lower free border of the mesentery, the edge of which is thickened in continuation with the thickening which forms the mesenterial filament above, of the mesentery which are in the form of a bunch of filaments. I have fol- lowed Fowler in extending the name to that mass of contorted filaments, which is generally known as the contorted mesenterial filaments. This I have done because (1) they differ in histological detail from the filament on the upper part of the mesentery in exactly the same manner that Gosse’s acontia differ. (2) They may be protruded through cinclides. (8) They are clearly a less differentiated condition of Gosse’s acontia, but not morphologically distinct from them. To those who adhere to Gosse’s original definition, the name as I use it in the text, would be incorrect. 306 GILBERT C. BOURNE. but differing from this in histological detail. The more com- plicated and effective acontia of Sagartia are probably de- veloped from a simpler form, such as this. In Fungia the mesoglea appears to break up dendritically in the swelling of the acontium, instead of ending in a T-shaped swelling, as in other forms (vide fig. 12). The acontia of the tertiary and succeeding mesenteries lie coiled up in the exocceles at the bases of those mesenteries, and in section appear to fill up the greater part of those spaces (vide figs. 13 and 15). Since the septa are large compared with the interseptal loculi, and since the septa are always in the entocceles, it fol- lows that the two mesenteries forming a pair are pushed apart from one another, whilst the adjacent mesenteries of contiguous pairs lie close together. So much is this the case, that when a decalcified animal is cut across transversely the adjacent me- senteries of contiguous pairs appear from their position to form pairs, and in old specimens they may become fused together at a little distance from the periphery, as is shown in fig. 11. The Celenteron.—The celenteron is represented by the axial space lying below the stomodeum, the peripheral cham- bers known as exocceles and endocceles, and the extra-thecal space lying on the aboral surface between the theca and the external body wall. The axial portion of the celenteron is not definitely cireum- scribed. Above, it opens freely into the stomodzal invagina- tion; below, it is limited by the investments of the trabecular columella; at the sides it is partially limited by the thickened borders of the mesenteries above described. So far as it can be considered as a definite cavity it is no doubt the cavity in which digestion is chiefly effected, the process being carried out by the secretions of the gland-cells of the mesenterial filaments. The relations of the peripheral parts of the ccelenteron are difficult to understand in this, as in all other Madreporarian corals, but are further complicated in Fungia by the presence of synapticula. The ccelenteron is composed of all those ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 307 chambers which are lined with endoderm, and if a cast be made of all those chambers it will represent the space occupied by the celenteron. Such a cast I have attempted to represent in fig. 16. The peripheral chambers of the ccelenteron are divided by the mesenteries into exoceles and entocceles ; in those corals in which, as in Fungia, all the septa are entoccelic, the entoceles are almost obliterated by the septa which rise up within them, but morphologically lie wholly outside them, since every part of the corallum is invested with its proper layers [viz. a layer of cells lying next to the calcareous sub- stance from which the latter is secreted (the calycoblasts of von Heider), a very thin layer of mesogloea, and a layer of endoderm], and is thus separated from the ccelenteron by the three layers of tissue which limit every part of the body. Thus, in a cast of the celenteron, the latter is seen to he broken up into wedges by the spaces which are occupied by the septa (vide fig. 16), and in Fungia these wedges are further perforated by the apertures through which pass the synapticula connecting adjacent septa. Further than this, outside the theca (which is basal and also perforate in Fungia), there lies a portion of the cclenteron, communicating with the intra-thecal chambers by canals which pass through the perforations in the theca, and, like the intra- thecal chambers, divided by the continuations of the mesen- teries into exocceles and entocceles (vide figs. 15 and 16, cw/.). These complicated relations cannot, I conceive, admit of rational explanation unless the theory of von Koch be admitted, namely, that the corallum is derived primitively from the basal ecto- derm, and that the theca is formed by the fused peripheral parts of the septa, which in fusing divide the mesenteries, and leave a portion of the coelenteron external to the theca. From his account of the development of Astroides calycularis (21) it appears that the skeleton first makes its appearance as a ring of calcareous nodules situated between the ecto- derm of the basal disc and the surface of attach- ment. As development proceeds radial folds of the ectoderm and mesoglea (mesoderm) are formed, beneath which are 308 GILBERT C. BOURNE. lines of calcareous crystals; these are the first rudiments of the septa. Ata later stage the septa form proportionally high plates, over which the ectoderm is bent in the form of a fold, the septa begin to branch at their peripheral ends, and eventually these branches meet and fuse with one another to form the theca, which cuts the mesenteries in two portions and isolates the more peripheral part of the ccelenteron from the more central, the former being limited externally by the soft body wall, which at first extends down to the base of the theca. One might almost speak of the corallum as being pushed in from below, all the three body layers being invagi- nated to receive it. Eventually the ectoderm which is bent over the corallum, having the sole function of secreting cal- careous matter, comes to be represented by that layer of cells lying between the mesogloea and the corallum, to which von Heider has given the name of calycoblasts. In old specimens the external body wall becomes atrophied around the lower part of the calyx, where it is physiologically replaced by the theca, but it still holds its place as an investment of the upper part of the calyx (Randplatte of von Heider) (14). The young nurse-stock of Fungia, so long as it remains cup shaped, has all the characters of a Caryophyllia, and may be compared strictly with the young Astroides. Stutchbury (39) says of it, ‘So long as the young Fungia retains the form of a Caryo- phyllia it is entirely enveloped by the soft parts of the animal, but as the upper disc of the coral spreads out and assumes its characteristic form, the pedicle is left naked and the soft parts extend only to the line where the separation afterwards takes place.” In the “ Alert ” specimen in the British Museum the soft parts still extend to the base of the nurse-stalk, although the upper disc has begun to widen out. When the young Fungia separates from the nurse-stock a clean scar is left at the point of detachment, through which there is for a short time free communication to the interior. But the deposition of calcareous matter round the central ends of the septa soon blocks up this passage, and immediately afterwards the soft parts covering the theca (which is now nearly confined to the ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 309 basal surface as in the adult) meet in the centre and fuse together, so that the primitively external corallum is now entirely covered over by soft tissues, and one can only predi- cate its origin from the fact that it is everywhere covered with three investing tissues, the ectoderm, now represented by the calycoblastic layer, the mesoglea, and the endoderm, to which I have above referred under the name of the skeletotrophic investments. That part of the coelenteron which in Fungia lies external to the theca on the aboral surface, is the same mor- ‘phologically as the extra-thecal part of the ccelenteron described as existing around the upper part of the calyx in other corals by von Koch, von Heider, and Fowler. For further information on this interesting subject I must refer the reader to the published works of these three authors. The Stomodeum.—This is extremely short in Fungia. I was unable to trace the existence of gonidial grooves (siphono- glyphes) at its ends, though they no doubt exist. When alive the animal constantly closes the middle portion of its mouth, leaving small apertures at the extreme ends through which currents of water pass in and out. I did not determine whether these currents are constant in direction. Histology.—This is simple in character and does not differ in any essential from the Actinian type. The ectoderm of the peristome is composed of long columnar epithelial cells, whose inner ends are drawn out into fine pro- cesses which rest on the mesogloea ; each ectoderm cell has a distinct oval nucleus which stains deeply in borax carmine. Numerous smaller interstitial cells lie between the processes of the inner ends of the epithelial cells. Large nematocysts are embedded in the ectoderm ; they are especially abundant on the ectoderm of the tentacles, but excepting for this the histology of the tentacles is quite similar to that of the rest of the peristome. I could not distinguish more than one kind of nematocyst in Fungia. In every case the lower part of the thread is armed with a spiral line of spines ; when inverted the terminal end of the thread is coiled obliquely round the basal portion. The ectoderm of the aboral surface differs slightly VOL, XXVII, PART 3.—NEW SER. Z 310 GILBERT C. BOURNE. from that of the peristome in that the epithelial cells compos- ing it are less columnar and more cubical, and it is scantily provided with nematocysts. Between the corallum and the mesoglcea there is invariably a layer of rounded, granular, soft-looking cells which do not stain easily; their nucleus is tolerably large and stains but faintly in borax carmine. From their position these are clearly equivalent to ectoderm cells; they are the calycoblasts (vide fig. 17, cy.}.. They are simple rounded cells, as described by their discoverer, von Heider ; I could find no trace of stria- tion in them as Sclater did in Stephanotrochus, nor does their shape agree with his account. Between the ectoderm and endoderm of the body wall, and between the two layers of endoderm which form each septum, lies a sheet of homogeneous tissue called by German authors “ Stutzlamelle,” by Englishmen “ mesoderm,” or sometimes “the supporting lamina.” I have called it the Mesoglea for reasons which are more conveniently given at the end of this paper. I could find no trace of structure in this layer in Fungia, though it is possible that the use of proper reagents in the fresh condition might have disclosed a fibrillar structure. It stains slightly with hematoxylin, not at all with borax carmine. The endoderm is composed throughout of a single layer of cubical cells with a tolerably large nucleus and a nucleolus. Presumably these cells bear cilia in the living animal. In many parts of the body, but particularly in the region of the insertion of the mesenteries, the endoderm is crowded with masses of rounded nucleated cells of peculiar appearance ; at first sight they might easily be mistaken for endoderm cells forming a layer several cells deep. When treated with iodine they give a blue colouration, so that there can be no doubt that they are symbiotic alge, which occur so plentifully in the endoderm of many Actiniz. I was unable to find any trace of gonads in the specimens which | examined. The study of the anatomy of Fungia justifies the position which has always been assigned to it, between the perforate and imperforate Madreporarians. The theca, it has been ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 311 shown, is perforate in its more peripheral portions, imperforate in its central portion, and as age increases the imperforate area increases largely. The canals passing through the per- forate portion, and putting the intra-thecal in communication with the extra-thecal coelenteron are, no doubt, homologous with the system of canals described by Fowler in Rhodo- psammia parallela. I can offer no explanation of the origin and significance of the synapticula. Physiologically they seem to serve as stays or buttresses, giving solidity and coherence to the corallum. The most important result of my researches seems to me to be the strong evidence furnished in favour of von Koch’s theory of the formation of the skeleton in the Madreporaria, the evidence in favour of the existence of extra-thecal ccelen- teron being, as I think, particularly conclusive. The Mesoglea, Mesoderm, or Stitzlamelle in Celenterata. Throughout my paper I have used the name Mesoglea for the (structureless) supporting membrane which separates the ectoderm from the endoderm in Fungia, as in all the Ceelenterata. The names given to this layer by German authors are Stiitzlamelle, Zwischensubstanz, Gallertschichte, or Mesoderm. Among English authors the use of the name mesoderm has become general in describing it. Whilst the exact significance of this layer in the Coelenterata and its homology with the mesoblast of the higher Metazoa are, to say the least of it, far from being settled, it seems to me that the use of the name mesoderm is highly productive of confusion and error. The names ectoderm and endoderm, meaning simply outer and inner skin, were first given by Allmann to the outer and inner cell layers of the Ceelenterata (G. J. Allmann, “On the Anatomy and Physiology of Cordylophora,” ‘ Phil. Trans.,’ exlili, 1853), and had they always retained this their original signification there could have been no objection to the use of 312 GILBERT C. BOURNE. the name mesoderm for the median layer of the Celenterate body. But, as the Hertwigs have pointed out very clearly, from the time that the primary germinal layers, the epiblast and hypoblast, of the higher Metazoa were first compared and homologised with the ectoderm and endoderm of the Ceelenterata, there has been an increasing tendency to use the names ectoderm and endoderm as the equivalents of epiblast and hypoblast ; and this is especially the case among German authors, with whom the use of the names epiblast, mesoblast, hypoblast for the germ layers of the embryo, has not found general acceptance. It followed that the name mesoderm came to be used in the same sense, or very nearly so, as meso- blast, instances being numerous among German authors, and not infrequent even among English authors, where the meso- derm of the germ or embryo is spoken of. The difficulty arising from the identical use of these two names was appre- ciated by the Hertwigs and by F. E. Schulze, who treated the subject at some length, each in their own way. F. E. Schulze asks the very pertinent question whether the name mesoderm can only be used in those cases in which a special layer of cells arises early, that is, before the development of tissues and organs, as a special germ layer; or whether one can speak of a mesoderm when a differentiation of a special middle layer of tissue from the outer or inner epithelial layer arises later and without the formation of a special germ layer. He concludes by drawing a distinction between triple-walled animals, such as the Celenterata, and those which have three germinal layers (viz. the higher Metazoa (Triploblastica) but not the Coelenterata), admitting at the same time that the Celenterates have not a mesoderm in the sense of a distinct layer of cells derived from either or both of the two primary germ layers before the latter show any differentiation into tissues or organs. He speaks of them as being “ dreischich- tige”’ but “ zweiblattrige.” The Hertwigs, in dealing with the difficulty, proposed to limit the use of the words ectoblast and entoblast (i.e. epiblast and hypoblast) to the germinal layers of the embryo, and to use the names ectoderm and endoderm ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 313 to denote the outer and inner limiting layers of the adult body, whilst the name mesoderm should include all those tis- sues which lie between the two limiting layers above men- tioned. This nomenclature is very objectionable, and indeed has not met with very general acceptance. If limited to the Coelenterata it would be sufficiently expressive and consistent, but when applied to the higher groups of the Metazoa it be- comes utterly impossible of application. To begin with, it is hard to draw any sharp line between the external and internal limiting membranes in the higher Metazoa; in forms where the stomodeum and proctodzeum are derived from epiblastic invaginations, and form no inconsiderable part of the digestive tract, the confusion becomes complete. In the Isoyoda, for instance, nearly the whole of the digestive tract is formed from the stomodezum and proctodzeum ; thus, according to the Hert- wigs, this clearly epiblastic internal limiting layer would be called endoderm. In the Vertebrate phylum, also, the adult nervous system, clearly derived as it is from the epiblast, would, because it lies between the two limiting layers, come under the name of mesoderm. Moreover, it is an altogether unscientific and confusing method to classify tissues by their position in the adult rather than by their derivation from the primitive germ layers. The words ectoderm, mesoderm, endoderm, have become so universally used as the equivalents of epiblast, mesoblast, hy- poblast, that there is very little hope of their being now limited to the group of Coelenterata to which they were origi- nally applied, and this being the case we ought to consider how far the median supporting lamella of that phylum, the Stutzlamelle or Gallertschichte of German authors, is homolo- gous with the mesoblast of the higher Metazoa before apply- ing the name mesoderm to it. If it is not homologous, but is of a different nature, then some other name than mesoderm should be found for it, otherwise it will be confused with the true mesoblast. This opens two questions (1) What do we mean when we speak of a true mesoblast? (2) What are the characters of the 314 GILBERT C. BOURNE. median lamella, and what is its origin in the Celenterate phylum ? This is not the place to enter into a discussion of the whole subject of the origin and significance of the germinal layers, which the first question introduces, but it may shortly be stated, without going very far wrong, that by mesoblast is meant a layer of undifferentiated cells, developed in the embryo before the differentiation of other organs or tissues, from either one or the other or both of the primary germ layers, the epi- blast and hypoblast. By mesoderm, or its adjective meso- dermic, are meant all such tissues in the adult as are clearly derived from the mesoblast. This is not the sense in which I should like to use the term, but a sense which has become inevitable from the usage of other authors. To this idea of mesoblast receut theories on the origin of metameric segmentation have added another highly important signification, and one which is of especial importance to the present question. In the majority of the higher Metazoa (Triploblastica) the mesoblast is understood, in part, to denote the limiting layer of the celom. The Platyhelminthes offer a difficulty to this conception in that they are not known to possess a true ceelom, and it is a question whether they ances- traily possessed one, or whether they are the surviving repre- sentatives of the triploblastic Metazoon in which the celom was not developed. From the analogy of the Discophora, and from other considerations, I am inclined to think it probable that future researches will prove that all the Triploblastica are ancestrally Coelomata, the presence of mesoblast implying the (ancestral) presence of a celom.! However this may be, in 1 Tn the embryo of Leptoplana, the cells which will form the mesoblast are marked out very early, before the hypoblast and epiblast are definitely estab- lished. But it is noticeable that the mesoblast cells are split off from the four large cells which afterwards form the hypoblast, the epiblast having been already marked out by four smaller cells, which eventually increase in number and surround the mesoblast and hypoblast. I think that in this case the mesoblast may fairly be said to have a hypoblastic origin. I can see no objection to the view that this may be a very much abbreviated development, derived from a type in which the mesoblast arose as (hypoblastic) outgrowths ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 315 all those forms in which a ccelom is recognised the division of the mesoblast into splanchnopleure and somatopleure, and its relation to the ccelom in limiting it, must enter largely into our conception of what is meant by the term mesoblast. The origin of the mesoblast is very various ; for information on this point I must refer the reader to Balfour’s ‘Comparative Embryology,’ vol. ii, p. 290, where a tabular account of its various modes of origin is given. From this table it will be seen that while instances of a mixed derivation of the meso- blast are not common, a purely epiblastic derivation is still more uncommon, occurring in fact only in the larva of Desor, Bonellia, and perhaps in Lumbricus trapezoides. A purely hypoblastic derivation is of frequent occurrence. It is generally admitted that part of the mesoblast, at any rate, was primitively derived from the epiblast ; that in many forms all traces of this derivation are lost has been explained by Lankester (26 and 27) by his theory of precocious segregation. On the other hand there is much evidence in favour of the view that the coelom is derived from archenteric diverticula, and that the limiting walls of the ceelom are in consequence de- rived from hypoblast. This is clearly the case in several groups; in others there is reason to believe that the origin of the mesoblast as ingrowths from the lips of the blastopore is an abbreviation of development, and that in the ancestors of the groups in which this occurs the mesoblast took its rise from the walls of outgrowths of the archenteron. It is assumed that the triploblastic Metazoa took their origin from the diploblastic Metazoa, as the Ccelenterates have been called (I leave the Dicyemidz and Orthonectide out of the question). The Celenterate, represented by an Actinia, already in the elongation of its mouth and the arrangement of its mesenteries, shows a tendency to bilateral symmetry. It is supposed that this tendency is further increased, that the radial symmetry of the peripheral chambers is replaced by a bilateral symmetry, metamerically repeated along the long axis formed of the archenteron. If this were admitted it would admit the Turbellaria among the Coelomata. 316 GILBERT ©. BOURNE. by the mouth; and, finally, it is supposed that these chambers are the equivalents of the paired archenteric diverticula seen in the embryo of Amphioxus, outgrowths which are eventually nipped off to form the mesoblastic somites, the walls of which constitute the mesoblast, the cavities the celom. If the facts adduced in support of this theory are not numerous enough to warrant our giving unqualified consent to it, there is at least a great deal to be said in its favour. What is important to the present purpose is, that if it be accepted as a probability, and if further it be admitted as a general statement that, throughout the Triploblastica this is the origin of the ccelom, then by far the greater part of what we understand by mesoblast in the Triploblastica is homologous, not with the supporting lamina, the Stiitzlamelle, of the Coelenterata, but with the endoderm lining the cavities of the entoceles and exocceles. If we seek for an explanation of the supporting lamina in its origin we do not get a very satisfactory answer. Kowalevsky (25) describes the development of a jelly-like interstitial tissue between the cells of the inner layer of the thickened ectoderm of the larve of certain Alcyonarians. The inner cells eventu- ally lose their primitive shape, become star shaped or spindle shaped, and are separated from one another by an interstitial, jelly-like substance. The outer ectoderm cells form a plaster epithelium, which bounds the external surface of the animal. In this case there is no doubt that the interstitial tissue, usually called the mesoderm of the adult, is derived from the epiblast. We have not so exact an account of the development of the supporting lamina in any other group of the Ccelenterata. Fol (10) describes the appearance of a clear transparent jelly between the two primary layers in Geryonia, but is unable to state which layer it is derived from. Claus (2) is no more explicit on the same subject in his work on Charybdea marsupialis. Metschnikoff (‘Studien ber die Entwicklung der Medusen und Siphonophoren’) speaks of a similar jelly- like substance making its appearance, but he does not say how. Chun gives no further account of the origin of the jelly- like substance in Ctenophora ; but, according to a recent paper ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 317 oy Metschnikoff (29), mesoblast cells are marked off in the embryo of Callianira bialata before any tissues are de- veloped, but after the complete separation of ectoderm from endoderm. He says, further, that the case is the same in Beroe and Cydippe. From the account given the segmentation appears to be very peculiar. If the formation of mesoderm is correctly described it would mark off the Ctenophora very sharply from the remainder of the Coelenterata. Metschnikoff, however, for reasons which are not quite clear to me, refuses to this layer the name of mesoderm. No account is given of the origin of the supporting lamina in the Hydrozoa, nor in the Actinaria. The only certain knowledge, then, that we have about the origin of the jelly-like layer is that in the Aleyonarians Sym- podium coralloides and Clavularia crassa the inter- stitial substance is derived from the epiblast, and the cells in it are epiblast cells. Thus the origin of the jelly-like support- ing lamina of Ccelenterata gives no direct evidence of its homology with the mesoblast of the Triploblastica, but rather the contrary, for the latter is, as we have seen, rather connected with the hypoblast than with the epiblast. The characters of the supporting lamina in the Ceelenterata are as follows : In the Hydromeduse it is a fine, apparently structureless membrane, interposed between ectoderm and endoderm. When treated with suitable reagents it exhibits a fibrillar arrange- ment; it contains no cells. In the Siphonophora it is a structureless jelly-like substance. In the Scyphomeduse (Charybdea) the jelly-like substance is abundant, forming the bulk of the umbrella; it contains no cells, but has a fibrillar arrangement. In the Discomedusz (Aurelia) the gelatinous matrix contains a number of oval or star-shaped cells, anastomosing with one another, and mainly derived from the hypoblast. In the Ctenophora it contains muscular stellate cells, mostly of epiblastic origin, though some are stated by Chun to come from the hypoblast. 318 GILBERT C. BOURNE. According to Metschnikoff, in certain forms these cells are marked out early in the embryo. In Alcyonaria cells in which the calcareous spicules forming the skeleton are developed lie embedded in a gelatinous matrix. In Actinaria and Madreporaria the supporting lamina is fibrillar, and contains a few connective-tissue cells. Some- times muscular fibres are embedded in it (Hertwigs, 15). It is obvious that in none of these cases (except the doubtful case of the Ctenophora, as described by Metschuikoff) is there anything like a true mesoblast, in the sense of a cellular layer marked out early in the embryo. But there is a third layer of tissue in the body, interposed between the ectoderm and endoderm, which in some cases does and in others does not contain cells, but the bulk of which in all cases is a gelatinous matrix. This third layer assumes immense development in some forms, e. g. the Discomedusz and Alcyonaria, so that it is wholly misleading to call Ceelenterates two-layered animals. They are certainly three-layered—anyone can see that by cutting a section across any one of them—but the question is, Can they possibly be called triploblastic ? Can they be said to possess a third germinal layer—a mesoblast? - It is sometimes argued that the mesoblast is, after all, nothing more than a layer of cells developed from one or both of the two primary layers; that the middle layer of the Coelenterata contains cells in many instances; that these cells differ from the mesoblast cells of other forms only in the date of their taking up their position in the third layer, the former being separated off from -the primary layers in the embryo, the latter in the adult ; that this difference in time is not essential ; and that therefore the cell-containing middle layer in the Alcyonaria, for example, has as much right to be called a mesoblast as that of any other animal. I cannot but think that this style of argument leads to a want of precision of ideas, and to a vagueness in the definition of the thing signified. In a great number of forms the middle layer contains no cellular element; it is a nearly structureless ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 319 gelatinous matter, poured in, as it were, between the ecto- derm and endoderm to serve as a support for those tissues and to give coherence and consistency to the body of the animal. Where no cells are present (Hydromeduse, Charybdcea), a third cell layer, a mesoblast, obviously cannot be spoken of. In other forms we find cells derived from one or other of the primary layers wandering into the gelatinous substance after the formation of the latter, and retaining a constant position there (Discomeduse, Actinaria). ‘These cells ought to be con- sidered epiblastic or hypoblastic according to their origin, just as much as the central nervous system of the Vertebrata, entirely surrounded by mesoblastic structures, is considered as part of the epiblast. In the Alcyonaria the separation of the epiblast cells which are destined to become the skeletogenous cells takes place contemporaneously with the secretion of the gelatinous matrix in which they are embedded. None the more is the layer thus formed entitled to be called a germinal layer, or even a separate cell layer, though a step has been made towards the latter. The cells forming the skeleton are clearly epiblastic in origin, are derived from the epiblast after its demarcation, and are properly considered as its derivatives. The Alcyonarian skeleton is really of epiblastic origin. In a further stage the cells which, in Ctenophora, are destined to become stellate muscular cells embedded in the gelatinous matrix of the supporting lamina, are, according to Metschnikoff, marked out early in the embryo, at a period when the endoderm is scarcely covered in by the ectoderm. This is nearly the same thing as the formation of embryonic mesoblast, and foreshadows it, but the ultimate history of the cells ought to preclude our calling them mesoblastic. I do not wish to assert that the supporting lamina of Ce- lenterata is not represented in the mesoblast of Coelomata; it is highly probable that it is. The Aleyonaria and Ctenophora are good examples of the tendency which muscular and con- nective-tissue cells, primitively belonging to the external and internal limiting layers, have to separate themselves from their 320 GILBERT C. BOURNE. original position and to become more deeply situated. When such cells form a layer situated between epiblast and hypo- blast they constitute a third layer, a mesoblast. But in point of fact we have no positive evidence that such a simple third layer exists without the ancestral coexistence of a celom. I have already given reasons for believing that such a simple me- soblast does not obtain in the Platyhelminthes. The nearest approach to it is in the Ctenophora, and in them the stellate cells are homologous, not with the whole of the mesoblast of the Celomata, but only with a part of it, viz. that part which may be supposed to have originated independently of the celom, but of the origin of which the traces are, in the majority of cases, suppressed. The part is not the whole, nor should the name denoting the whole be given to the part, for which reason I object to giving the name mesoblast, or its equivalent mesoderm, to the supporting lamina of Ccelenterata. I have proposed for it the name Mesogloa, a name which was suggested to me by Professor Lankester in the course of a conversation on this subject, and which corresponds exactly to the Gallertlage of German authors. Its meaning, “ middle jelly,” has particular reference to the Medusze, of whose bodies it forms the greater part. Before concluding this paper I have to express my obliga- tions to Professor Moseley, who kindly permitted me to use the Oxford laboratory during my studies, and assisted me with much valuable advice. Also to my friends Mr. Hatchett Jackson, and Mr. W. Baldwin Spencer of Oxford, who helped me in many ways. ANATOMY OF THE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 321 List oF Works REFERRED TO. 1. F. M. Batrour.—‘ Comparative Embryology,’ 1880, 2 vols. 2. C. Craus.—* Untersuchungen tiber Charybdca marsupialis,” ‘ Ar- beit. aus. Zool. Instit. Wien,’ Bd. i, p. 221. . J. D. Dana.—‘ Report on Zoophytes of the Wilkes’ Exploring Expedi- tion,’ 1846. 4, J. D. Dana.—‘ Corals and Coral Islands,’ 1872. 18. 20. 21 . . P. Martin Duncay.— Observations on the Madreporarian Family the Fungide,” ‘Journ. Linn, Soc.,’ xvii, p. 187. . H. ve Lacaze Dututers.—“ Développement des Coralliaires,” ‘ Arch. de Zool. Exper. et gén.,’ tom. i, 1872. . H. pe Lacaze Duruters.—“ Développement des Coralliaires,” ‘ Arch. de Zool. Exper. et gén.,’ tom. ii, 1873. . Escuscnoi1z.— Isis,’ 1825, p. 476, pl. 5, fig. 19. . G. H. FowLrrer.—“ The Anatomy of the Madreporaria,” I, ‘ Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ 1885, p. 577. . H. Fou.—“ Die erste Entwicklung der Geryonideneies,” ‘ Jenaische Zeitschrift,’ vii, p. 471. . P. H. Gossr.—‘ Actinologia Britannica,’ 1860. . Haacnze.—* Blastologie der Korallen,” ‘Jenaische Zeitschrift,’ 1879. . A. von Hemper.—“ Sagartia troglodytes,” ‘Sitz. der Kais. Akad. zum Wien,’ lxxv, Abth. i, p. 367. . A. von Hurprr.— Die Gattung Cladocora,” ‘Sitz. der Kais. Akad. Wiss.,’ 1881. . O. anp R. Herrwie.— Die Actinien,’ Jena, 1879. . HoLttarp.—‘ These de la faculté des Sciences de Paris,’ Sorbonne, 1848. . G. von Kocu.— Bemerkungen iiber das Skelet der Korallen,” ‘ Morph. Jahrb.,’ v, p. 316; Extract in ‘ Proc. Zool. Soc.,’ 1880, p. 24. G. von Kocu.—* Notizen iiber Korallen,’ ‘Morph. Jahrb.,’ vi, p. 355. G. von Kocu.— Mittheilungen iiber Coelenteraten,” ‘Jenaische Zeit- schrift,’ xi. G. von Kocu.—“ Mittheilungen tiber das Kalkskelet der Madreporarien,” ‘Morph. Jahrb.,’ viii, p. 85; Abstract in ‘Journ. Roy. Micr. Soc.’ (2), ii, p. 795. G. von Kocu.—“ Ueber die Entwicklung der Kalkskelettes von As- troides calycularis,” ‘Mitth. aus der Stat. Zool. Neapel,’ iii, 1882, p. 284. 322 GILBERT C. BOURNE. 22. 23. 24 G. von Kocu.—‘ Biol. Centralblatt,’ ii, 1882. G. von Kocu.—‘ Ueber das Verhaltniss von Skelet und Weichtheile be den Madreporen,” ‘ Morph. Jahrb.,’ xii, p. 154, 1886. . A. KonitKer.—‘ Jeones Histologie,’ 2te Abth., Heft i, p. 116. 25. A. Kowatevsky.—* Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Alcyoniden,” ‘ Zool. Anzeig.,’ 2te Jahrg., No. 38. 96. E. Ray LANKEsTER.—‘ Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.,’ xi, p. 321, 1873. 27. HE. Ray Lanxester.—‘ Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ New Series, xvii, 28 29 30 3l 32. 33 34 35 36 37 p. 399. . Ex. MetscunrKorr.— Spongeologische Studien,” ‘ Zeit. fiir wiss. Zool., xxxil, 1879. . Ev. Metscunixorr.— Vergleichend Embryologische Studien,” ‘Zeit. fur wiss. Zool.,’ xlii, 1885. . Mitnr-Epwarps anp Haimre.—‘ Histoire des Coralliaires,’ Paris, 1860. . H. N. Mosrtry.—‘‘ On Seriatopora and Pocillopora,” ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,” New Series, 1882, p. 391. H. N. Mosetry.— “ Challenger ” Reports,’ “ Zoology,” vol. ii, “ Report on the Deep Sea Madreporaria.” . Quoy anp Garmard.—‘ Voyage de l’Astrolabe,’ vol. ii, pl. xiv. . F. E. Scuvutze.— Entwickelung der Sycandra raphanus,” ‘Zeit. fiir wiss. Zool.,’ xxv, 1875, Suppl. . FE. E. Scnvrze.— Untersuchungen tiber den Bau und die Entwicklung der Spongien,” ‘ Zeit. fiir wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xxxi, p. 262. . SCHNEIDER AND RottrEKEN.—‘ Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist.,’ vii, 1871. . W. L. Sctater.— On a Madreporarian Coral of the genus Stephano- trochus,” ‘ Proc. Zool. Soc.,’ 1866. 38. C. Semper.— Generationswechsel bei Steinkorallen,” ‘Zeit. fiir wiss 39 Zool.,’ xxii, p. 235. . SturcHBuRY.— Trans. Linn. Soe.,’ vol. xvi, 1830, p. 494. 40. ALLEN THomson.— Report Brit. Assoc., 1877, ‘ President’s Address.’” 4] 1G. H. Fow.er.— Anatomy of the Madreporatia,” ii, ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ xxvii. 1 Received since this paper was sent up to the press. ANATOMY OF TRE MADREPORARIAN CORAL FUNGIA. 3239 DESCRIPTION OF PLATES XXIII, XXIV, & XXV. Illustrating Mr. Gilbert C. Bourne’s Paper on ‘‘ The Anatomy of the Madreporarian Coral Fungia.” Fie. 1. Ad naturam.—General view of Fungia dentata, showing the ar- rangement of the tentacles and their relation to the septa. Fie. 2.—Diagram in illustration to Fig. 1. m. Mouth. ¢. Tentacles. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Septa (or tentacles) of the first, second, third order, &c. Primary septa coloured red, secondary blue, tertiary green, quaternary yellow, quinary, &c., black. Fics. 3—8.—Diagrammatic, from Stutchbury, Semper, and Moseley. Fig. 3 is a young nurse-stock of Fungia immediately after fixation. p. Peristome. ¢h. Theca. 4. Base. Fig. 4. The same, in which the’peristome has commenced to widen out and assume its characteristic form. Fig. 5. Nurse-stock of Fungia; an absorption of calcareous matter has taken place along the line £ where the young Fungia will separate from the nurse-stock. Fig. 6. Young Fungia shortly after separation from the nurse-stock. The peristome has grown greatly in excess of the theca. Fig. 7. The same more advanced, showing the increasing size of the peristome. Fig. 8. The adult Fungia. Fic. 9.—Diagram showing a pair of mesenteries and their relation to the investing tissues of the corallum. The mesentery to the left is seen to be divided by a synapticulum into a central and a peripheral portion. ec. Kcto- derm. m. Mesogloea of the body wall. ed. Endoderm of the body wall. m'. Mesoglea of the mesenteries. m’. Mesoglaea of the skeletotrophic tissues. ed’. Endoderm of the mesenteries. ed’. Endoderm of the skeleto- trophic tissues. ms. Muscles. cy. Calycoblasts. ed. Nematocysts. m./. Mesenterial filaments. sb. a. Symbiotic alge. syz. Perforation through which a synapticulum passes. Fic. 10. Ad naturam.—A mesentery of Fungia dentata. ac. Acontia. y. m. s. Longitudinal muscle-fibres, the remainder of the lettering as before. The shaded part represents that part of the mesentery which is formed of mesoderm and its overlying muscular fibres. The dotted lines show the tubes (parts of the ccelenteron) bounded by endoderm of the skeletotrophic investment which run down between the synapticula, to the mesogloea of which thickened prolongations of the mesoglcea of the mesenteries are attached, as shown in 2. 324 GILBERT ©. BOURNE. Fic. 1]. Ad naturam.—Two contiguous mesenteries not belonging to the same pair, from an adult Fungia, showing their tendency to fuse together in old specimens. Lettering as before. Fie. 12. Ad naturam.—Section through an acontium, showing the dendritic branching of the mesoderm in the acontium, the large nematocysts ed., and the gland-cells gd. Fic. 13.—Diagrammatic horizontal section through the corallum and soft parts of Fungia dentata. The corallum is shaded, the mesoglcea is repre- sented by a black line. The calycoblasts are omitted for simplicity’s sake. The septa are seen to lie in the entoceles, the cclenteron being broken up by the synapticula into a number of parallel tubes, in each of which are seen the mesoglea thickenings 2, which give attachment to the vertical muscle- fibres. The acontia of the lower orders of mesenteries are seen coiled up in the celenteron. m¢. Mesenteries. syz. Synapticula. Fic. 14. Ad naturam.—Section through the body wall of F. dentata. ed. Endoderm. m. Mesogloea. ec. Ectoderm. z. Interstitial cells. Fic. 15.—Diagrammatic vertical section through the peripheral part of F. dentata. ec. p. Ectoderm of the peristome. ec. 6. Ectoderm of the base. The shading and lettering as in Fig. 13. ¢h. Theca. ev. Exoceele. ent. Ento- ccele external to theca. Fic. 16.—Diagram illustrating the relations of the celenteron to the corallum. The drawing may be considered as a cast of all the cavities lined by endoderm. At sp. are shown the spaces occupied by the septa, by which the body is broken up into a number of wedge-shaped masses. The rows of parallel elongate perforations show the position of the synapticula. At c@l. is seen that part of the body cavity which lies outside the perforate theca. th. Perforations for theca. syz. Perforations for synapticula. Fic. 17.—A portion of the skeletotrophic investment highly magnified. ed. Endoderm. m. Mesoglea. cy. Calycoblasts bo Or DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 8 On Some Points in the Development of Petromyzon fluviatilis.! By Arthur E. Shipley, B.A., Christ’s College, Cambridge, Demonstrator of Comparative Anatomy in the University. With Plates XXVI, XXVII, XXVIII, and XXIX. Tue development of the Lamprey has occupied the attention of many embryologists during the last fifty years. Of these we owe the most complete accounts of the changes through which the egg passes to Max Schultze, Owsjannikow, Calberla, Scott, Balfour, and Dohrn. I have recently worked through the development of Petromyzon again, and worked out the origin of several organs which have hitherto been incompletely known. In many of the most important points my researches confirm those of the earlier observers, and to these I have only referred at such length as would make the account intelli- gible; in others, such as the persistence of the blastopore, the origin of the ventral mesoblast, &c., I differ from previous descriptions; and some points, such as the development of the heart, of the parts of the brain and cranial nerves, are worked out for the first time. The material for this article was obtained by artificially 1 The differences between Petromyzon planeri and fluviatilis are so slight, and the intermediate forms so common, that I am disposed to follow Anton Schneider, and to consider them as varieties of the same species. This species may conveniently retain the name fluviatilis, as opposed to the larger form Petromyzon marinus. VOL, XXVII, PART 3 ——NEW SER. AA 326 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. fertilising the eggs of the ripe female Lampern, hatching the larve out, and rearing them in confinement. The breeding time is during the latter half of April and the beginning of May. The generative products of both male and female were squeezed into glass vessels containing fresh water, and the contents slightly stirred. The eggs at once adhered to the bottom and sides of the vessel, and were left undisturbed for three or four hours. The water was then poured off and a fresh supply added. This was kept thoroughly aerated by means of Semper’s aerating apparatus. The number of eggs fertilised were about 70 per cent. of the total, though some hatches were much more successful than others, The rate of segmentation and development also varied greatly, being influenced by the temperature and manner of aeration. The unfertilised eggs very soon could be distinguished from the fertilized ; they developed great cavities or craters and were soon attacked by fungi. The fungus, however, rarely affected the developing eggs. The spermatozoa have elongated heads, pointed at their free end, but thicker at the end from which the tail arises (fig. 1). Their length is from 35 to 40 micro. mm., of which the head forms 8 micro.mm. They move actively about in the water, until they come into contact with an ovum. They enter the egg through a micropyle, and Calberla states that the head only enters the protoplasm of the ovum, the tail remaining fixed in the micropyle, thus hindering the entrance of other spermatozoa. The eggs are almost spherical, with a diameter of about a millimetre. On contact with water the outer cell-membrane swells up and forms a gelatinous coating, by means of which the eggs adhere to the bottom and sides of the vessel. This gelatinous envelope is of considerable thickness ; it ultimately disappears shortly before the embryo is hatched. Sections through unfertilised eggs show the protoplasm crowded with oval yolk granules, which stain deeply. These yolk granules vary in size, and this is very evident in the segmenting eggs, DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. S27 where the yolk granules in the more quickly dividing upper pole are much smaller than those in the more inert lower pole. An attempt has been made to show that those parts of the unsegmented egg containing the smaller granules is destined to form the epiblastic parts of the embryo (16).! This view seems to me to need confirmation. The small size of the yolk granules in the epiblast might be due to the more rapid division of these cells, causing a more rapid consumption of the food-yolk. The unusually deep staining which the yolk granules assume very materially increases the difficulty of observation. EHspe- cially in the earlier stages of development the cell limits and nuclei were rendered obscure by the masses of deeply stained yolk granules. As previous observers have stated, there are two polar bodies extruded one after the other. After fertilization the egg con- tracts, leaving a cavity between it and the egg membrane. The first furrow appears about the fourth hour; it appears first in the upper pole and spreads round the egg on each side. Calberla states that the micropyle becomes at first oval, then slit like, and finally passes over into the primary furrow. I have not been able to observe this process in my eggs. He further states that the first furrow divides the egg into two unequal parts, a large epiblastic and a small hypoblastic ; the smaller of these divides subsequently more rapidly than the latter. Thus, according to him, the first furrow would cor- respond with the first equatorial one in the Frog’s ovum. Scott, although he had no fresh material to work with, was able to correct this, and, as the latter suggests, Calberla was probably misled by cases of abnormal segmentation. Many of the eggs which apparently had not been fertilized divided by one, two, and sometimes three furrows, and when this took place the furrows were nearly always abnormal in position. The second furrow is vertical and at right angles to the first, and also appears first in the upper pole. The third is 1 The figures in brackets refer to the list of papers at the end. 328 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. equatorial, but nearer the upper than the lower pole. After its appearance the epiblastic half is separated from the hypo- blastic or yolk-bearing half (fig. 2). The external phenomena of segmentation have been accu- rately described by Max Schultze, with the exception of the next stage. After the first equatorial furrow he describes two more in the same plane, but in my eggs the equatorial furrow was followed by two vertical lines, which appear at first in the upper pole exactly as they do in the Frog’s ovum (fig. 3). These are followed by two more equatorial furrows which divide the egg into thirty-two segments. After this the segments of the epiblastic pole divide more rapidly than those of the lower. Fig. 5 represents a transverse section through an egg thirty- six hours after fertilisation. In this stage it is a_blasto- sphere, with a segmentation cavity enclosed by a single layer of cells except along the line where the epiblastic and hypo- blastic cells join. Here the layer is two cells thick. The nuclei of the large cells appear small, but it must be recollected that the amount of protoplasm is very small compared to the yolk. The latter has been omitted for the sake of clearness. Fig. 6 is taken from an egg twelve hours later. Here both the roof and floor of the segmentation cavity are many cells thick. A similar stage is found in the Frog’s ovum, but there is this difference between the two. In the Frog’s egg the whole of the roof of the segmentation cavity forms epiblast ; in the Lamprey it is only the outermost layer. The following stages are accompanied by a thinning out of the roof of the segmentation cavity, and are represented in figs. 7 and 8. On this point my observations tend to confirm those of Calberla, and are opposed to those of Schultze, who found a many-layered roof to the segmentation cavity just before invagination. The thinning out appears to be brought about by the inner cells of the roof passing round to the sides and floor of the segmentation cavity. Just before the invagination which forms the gastrula the roof of the segmentation cavity consists of a single layer of cells; the segmentation cavity is DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 329 large and occupies the whole of the upper hemisphere, whilst the lower hemisphere is solid and consists of larger cells, which we may speak of as yolk-cells. The most external layer of these consists of rather columnar cells. These latter cells socn become smaller than the inner yolk-cells, and about the time of invagination the whole egg is enclosed by a layer of small columnar cells, the epiblast. This is brought about by the conversion of the outermost row of yolk-cells into small columnar cells. As Balfour has shown, this takes place latest in the region of the blastopore. The invagination which forms the mesenteron commences about 180 hours after fertilisation ; it commences at one side of the equator of the egg, in the region where the single layer of epiblast cells passes into the yolk-cells (fig. 9). The invagi- nation at first has a wide-arched slit-like opening, but this soon narrows into a small circular pore (fig. 4). The segmen- tation cavity is gradually obliterated by the invaginated cells. These from the first enclose a cavity, the mesenteron. In this respect the formation of the gastrula is like that of Amphioxus, and differs from that of the Amphibia, where the mesenteron appears later as a splitting underneath the invaginated cells. The presence of a large amount of food-yolk causes the invagi- nated cells to be pushed dorsalwards. The mesenteron extends as a tubular cavity about two thirds round the embryo. Its dorsal wall is composed of columnar cells resem- bling those of the general epiblast ; the cells forming the floor have the same characters as the yolk-cells (fig. 12). The dorsal side of the mesenteron lies in immediate contact with the under surface of the epiblast throughcut its entire length. In this respect again the Lamprey differs from the Frog, where the invaginated hypoblast cuts off a mass of cells on its dorsal side, which subsequently forms the mesoblast. The mesoblast now appears by the differentiation of two bands of these yolk-cells, which lie in the angles formed by the mesenteron and the epiblast (fig. 12). This differentiation commences in front and is continued backward. The two bands of mesoblast are separated dorsally by the juxtaposition 300 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. of the dorsal wall of the mesenteron and the epiblast, and ventrally by the hypoblastic yolk-cells which are in contact with the epiblast over two thirds of the embryo. Subse- quently, but at a much later date, the mesoblast is completed ventrally by the downgrowth on each side of these mesoblastic plates. This takes place at a comparatively early stage in the head and that part of the trunk lying in front of the liver. In the posterior part, which remains swollen with yolk, the ventral completion of the mesoblast is delayed. The first formation of the mesoblastic plates appears to take place by a differentiation of the hypoblastic yolk-cells in situ, and not from invaginated cells (figs. 12 and 13). The subsequent downward growth is brought about by the cells proliferating along the free ventral edge of the mesoblast, these cells then growing ventralwards, pushing their way between the yolk-cells and epiblast (fig. 11). This account of the origin of the mesoblast differs from that given by Scott. He describes the mesoblast as arising from two sources—(1) cells which are derived from the invagina- tion of the blastoderm, (2) the outermost layer of the hypo- blastic yolk-cells, which, according to Scott, split off from the remainder, and form a ventral sheet which completes the mesoblast in that side of the body. The mesoblast in the head is derived only from the first source, as by the time it is completed ventrally the head is raised above the yolk-con- taining parts. Shortly before the development of the head fold raises the head from the yolk-bearing part of the embryo, the neural plate becomes evident in the exterior. It extends as alow ridge from the anterior lip of the blastopore to just in front of the blind anterior end of the mesenteron, over two thirds of the circumference of the embryo. The blastopore is always visible at the posterior end of the neural plate. Schultze has given a very complete set of figures of the exterior of the embryo. As his figures show, with the elongation of the embryo the anterior end curves round and overlaps the posterior, thus obscuring the blastopore. Fig. 10 DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 331 is a section taken through the blastopore and the head soon after the head is raised above the general level of the egg. From his observations of the embryo as a whole, Schultze came to the conclusion that the blastopore persisted and gave rise to the anus, and he was supported in this view by Calberla. Later observers, however, who have studied the development of the Lamprey by means of sections, have maintained Benecke’s view that the blastopore disappears. Scott describes the neural canal enclosing the blastopore and figures the neurenteric canal thus formed. He describes the formation of the anus, from a protuberance of the alimentary canal which approaches the epidermis and breaks through about the twentieth day. Balfour also states that the blastopore closes and does not form the permanent anus. My observations of the embryo as an opaque object lead me to the belief that the blastopore remained open. In this I have been confirmed by sections taken through a series of embryos preserved at intervals of a few hours. Primarily the blastopore hes at the posterior dorsal end of the embryo (fig. 4), but by the growth of the dorsal surface and the forma- tion of the tail it comes to occupy a position in the ventral surface. What was the anterior lip in the first position comes to be the posterior in the latter. Fig. 4 is a view of the embryo twelve days old, as an opaque object, showing the blastopore at the posterior end of the neural ridge. Fig. 16 is an oblique section through an embryo about two days older, showing the nervous cord just separated from the skin, and the notochord both continuing behind the blastopore. Scott was of opinion that the lumen of the invaginated mesenteron persisted only in the fore-gut. Soon after the in- vagination is completed this part of the alimentary canal lying in the head and neck becomes raised from the rest of the embryo. It is thus separated off from the yolk-cells, and the hypoblastic cells in this region soon assume a definite columnar appearance, though they continue to contain yolk granules for some days. This region extends to where the liver appears 302 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. in older embryos. A similar change in the cells lining the mesenteron takes place at its posterior end. The cells lining the blastopore and extending for some distance into the ali- mentary canal assume very early a columnar appearance and appear perfectly continuous with the columnar epiblast (figs. 10, 14, and 16.) The cells lining the hind-gut retain the character of the yolk-cells for a long time, but the lumen of the mesenteron in this region never disappears, as Scott and Calberla thought. The lumen of the alimentary canal, with the exception of the mouth, is derived directly from the inva- gination which forms the gastrula, and no part of it is ever obliterated in the course of development. A similar persistence of the blastopore to form the anus appears to be common in the Amphibia. It has been shown to occur in the Newt by Miss Johnson, in the Frog by Spencer, and in Alytes by Gasser. Its occurrence in the Cyclos- tomata seems to point to the fact that it is a primitive feature retained in those eggs whose development is not greatly modified by the presence of a large mass of yolk. Renewed observations in the development of Amphioxus would pro- bably throw some light on this point. The Central Nervous System. The early development of the central nervous system has been so fully described by Calberla, Balfour, and Scott, that little is left to be added to their account. But the origin of the neural canal, the relationship of the posterior end of the neural cord to the blastopore, and the later development of the parts of the brain and the cranial nerves present points of interest. Calberla was the first to show that the central nervous system of the Lamprey arises by a delamination and not by an involution of the epiblast. He described a similar origin for the nervous system of the Teleostei, and Balfour and Parker found the same to be the case in Lepidosteus. The first trace of theneural plate appears about the eighth day after fertilization, just after the invagination is completed. A DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 330 shallow groove is seen running forward from the blastopore, round about two thirds of the embryo and passing a little in front of the blind end of the mesenteron. The groove is a very temporary structure and is soon replaced by a ridge. This arises by the epiblastic cells lining the groove, which are of a columnar shape, budding off cells from their under surface. The result of this is that a keel of cells is formed which forms the neural ridge externally (fig. 12), and internally presses in between the mesoblastic plates. The keel arises solely by the epiblast cells budding off cells in their under surface only. It is much deeper in the anterior third of its course, which region ultimately forms the brain. The keel in the course of two or three days loses its connec- tion with the epidermis ; this occurs at first anteriorly and ex- tends backward, and as Scott has pointed out, it does this of itself and not by an ingrowth of the mesoderm in each side as Calberla described. Figs. 13, 15, and 16 show the solid neural cord lying above the notochord, which by this time is separated off from the hypoblast. It is important to notice that the neural canal does not arise until after the connection between the neural cord and epidermis is severed. It is about the origin of this neural canal that my observations and those of Calberla and Scott are at variance. They described the epidermic layer of epiblast passing down into the nervous, in such a way that the canal, when it does appear, is lined by this layer. I have not been able to see any trace of this. The cells forming the nervous system appear to me to be all split off from the under surface of the epidermis in the dorsal middle line, and the continuity of the epidermis in this region never seems to be broken by any such invagination as they suggest. Balfour was also doubtful on this point; but in his and Parker’s work on the development of Lepidosteus, they state that there is no evidence of the epidermic layer being concerned in the formation of the canal. The canal seems to arise as a split between the cells in the axis of the solid cord, and not by the absorption of the central 304 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. cells, as has been suggested in the case of the Teleostei. It appears at first anteriorly and extends backward, and for some little time the walls of the lumen are by no means sharply defined. Processes from the cells lining the canal project into its cavity and suggest the idea that they have been torn out from between the cells of the other side. The neural cord remains solid at its posterior end for some time, and here it becomes fused with the surrounding struc- tures in a somewhat remarkable way. It does not fuse round the blastopore as Scott describes, indeed it is not easy, con- sidering its mode of origin, to see how it could; and there is no hollow neurenteric canal. Figs. 14 and 15 represent two sections taken through a larva just after hatching. Fig. 14 is through the region of the blastopore. It shows the neural cord with its canal already formed; beneath this lies the noto- chord, and beneath this again asolid rod of cells which is con- tinuous with the subnotochordal rod and the dorsal hypoblast. This latter structure is the solid postanal gut. The mesoblastic plates are seen separating off from the hypoblast yolk-cells which occupy the remaining space with the epidermis. Dor- sally this is produced to form the dorsal fin. Fig. 15 repre- sents a section through the tail a little posterior to the blasto- pore. Here the neural cord, notochord, and postanal gut have fused into a rod-like mass of tissue which is ventrally con- tinuous with the hypoblast cells; a few sections posterior to this none of the three embryonic layers are distinguishable except the epidermal portion of the epiblast. A longitudinal median section through the tail is represented in fig. 20. This shows the mass of indifferent tissue which lies in the tail and which by internal differentiation gives rise, as the tail grows, to mesoblastic somites, neural cord and postanal gut. This mass of tissue, which in many respects reminds one: of the growing point in a plant, may be called the primitive streak. It is perhaps worth while to point out that it lies at what was originally the anterior lip of the blastopore. A similar mass of tissue formed by the fusion of the pri- mary layers has been described by Balfour and Parker in DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 300 Lepidosteus, Spencer in the Frog, and Miss Johnson in the Newt. The further development of the central nervous system will be described later after some of the details connected with the mesoblast and hypoblast have been considered. The Mesoblast. The origin of this layer from the yolk-cells situated in the angle between the epiblast and the invaginated endoderm has been described above. For some little time the mesoblast re- mains in the condition of two triangular masses of cells, separated from one another dorsally by the notochord and ner- vous system, ventrally by the yolk-cells which lie in contact with the ventral epiblast. In the anterior end of the embryo the mesoblast soon unites ventrally by lateral downgrowths; in the trunk, however, which remains crowded with yolk-cells for a week or ten days after hatching, this takes place much later. Scott has described the formation of the muscle-plates very accurately, and it will therefore be unnecessary to give more than a short résumé in order to make the following account intelligible. About the twelfth or thirteenth day the meso- blastic somites appear by the segmentation of the dorsal part of the lateral mesoblastic plates. These appear at first ante- riorly, and the segmentation extends backwards. The most anterior one lies close behind the auditory sac. The ventral unsegmented mesoblast has split into the splanchopleure and the somatopleure on each side, and in the region just behind the posterior gill-cleft these have met ventrally, forming a ventral mesentery, connecting the alimentary canal with the ventral body wall. The mesoblast somites are shown in fig. 17, which repre- sents a horizontal section through an embryo fourteen days old. They are cubical masses of cells enclosing a small cavity, often entirely obliterated, which represents part of the body cavity. The cells surrounding this are at first uniform in size, and each side is only one cell thick. Like the other cells of 306 ARTHUR HE. SHIPLEY. the embryo they contain yolk granules, which are gradually absorbed. In the tail region these mesoblastic somites con- tinue to be segmented off from the primitive streak till five or six days after the larva is hatched. In transverse sections the mesoblastic somites appear trian- cular, having a median side against the nervous system and notochord, an external one against the epididymis and a ventral one. Besides these there are the anterior and posterior sides. The cells composing all these, except those of the external layer, develope into longitudinal muscles. Whilst this is taking place the dorsal surface of the embryo has become raised above the general level, so that the embryo in section is no longer round but pear-shaped. As Stannius, Grenacher, and Langerhans _ have shown, the muscles of the Lamprey fall into two groups, which differ in structure as well as in their disposition. The first of these form the myomeres, and are derived directly from the mesoblastic somites ; the second comprise the muscles of the eye, those belonging to the respiratory system, and those con- nected with the upper and lower lip and mouth generally. These seem to arise exclusively from the ventral unsegmented parts of the mesoblast, and perhaps, in some cases, from wan- dering mesoblast cells. The muscles of the heart resemble the latter in many points. Each myomere in the Lamprey or Ammoccete consists of a number of plates of muscle-substance, lying one on the top of another. Each plate is flat, and more less square in outline. It is bounded anteriorly and posteriorly by the myotomes ex- ternally by a connective-tissue layer closely connected with the skin, and internally by a similar layer. Above and below, or dorsally and ventrally, it is in contact with a similar muscle- plate. In some myomeres which have become modified, such as the anterior one which extends far forward over the ear, the shape of the muscle-plate has lost its square outline and be- come oblong, but in one of the myomeres of the trunk they are almost square in longitudinal section. From the above description it will be seen that each muscle- DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 337 plate or “ Kastchen” of Stannius occupies the horizontal space between two myotomes, and that they lie one on another, so that in a horizontal section we see only one, in a transverse or vertical section we see one lying on another like sheets of paper. Each “ muscle-plate” contains several nuclei, which stain more deeply than the muscle-substance. It is trans- versely striated, and faint longitudinal striz can also be de- tected ; these correspond with fibrillz, into which the muscle- substance easily breaks up. These latter are especially large, and can be easily recognised in transverse sections near the most external part of the ‘‘ muscle-plate.”’ The development of these muscle-plates is as follows :— The outermost layer of cells forming the mesoblastic somite does not appear to be converted into muscles. For along time it persists as a definite layer of cubical cells with large nuclei lying between the skin and the myomere; this is the case till long after the other cells of the mesoblastic somite have deve- loped into muscles. Finally, this layer seems to disappear, but remains of it can still be distinguished lying just within the skin, even when the myomere has assumed the appearance characteristic of the full-grown Ammocete. This view that the somatic layer does not take part in the formation of the myomeres, is not in agreement with what Balfour has de- scribed in the Elasmobranchs, where both the inner and outer layer become muscular; but, on the other hand, the muscles of the myomeres in Amphioxus appear to be de- rived from the splanchnic layer only, and the same view is supported by Gotte and the Hertwigs. The remaining cells of the mesoblastic somite begin to grow in between one another, and between each neighbouring somite an intermuscular septum is deposited. The process of growing in between one another is carried on until each cell occupies the whole length from one myotome to the next, and at the same time, each cell becomes somewhat flattened, so that their transverse section, which was at first round, become oval (fig. 24). At the same time longitudinal thickenings occur in the cortical part of the cell, the medullary portion 308 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. remaining clear and staining very slightly. The nucleus lies in this medullary portion. The longitudinal thickenings occur at intervals, so that in transverse section the cortex of the cell appears beaded ; these fine fibrille stain fairly well so that they can easily be distinguished from the medulla. The flat- tening of the cell goes on until the cell occupies the whole space between two myotomes, not only longitudinally but also transversely (fig. 25). The original nucleus of each cell divides into two or three, so that in each of these plates of muscle-substance two or three nuclei can be seen and an occa- sional yolk granule, which is, however, soon absorbed. In addition to the longitudinal striation caused by the thread-like thickenings in the cortex, a transverse striation appears. Each plate of muscle-substance remains in this condition, with a clear unstained medulla containing two or three deeply stained, large, flat, oval nuclei (fig. 18), with a well-marked nucleolus ; enclosed by a cortex, for about two weeks after hatching. The cortex consists chiefly of its dorsal and ventral walls, and each of these is thickened at regular intervals by the above-men- tioned fibrille. Each fibrilla runs the whole length of the myomere and is inserted into the intermuscular septa behind and in front. About a fortnight after the young Ammoceete is hatched, the substance of the fibrille increases at the expense of the medullary part, and this goes on until each plate of muscle-substance consists exclusively of fibrillar sub- stance. The nuclei have increased in number, but instead of lying loose in medulla they become squeezed in be- tween the fibrille, lose their regular shape and can only be recognised as small flattened bodies which stain deeply. The whole plate of muscle-substance now consists of fibrillar substance which stains uniformly with here and there a more deeply stained nucleus (fig. 29). The whole appears homo- geneous, the fibrille cannot as a rule be recognised, though in some cases they are seen in transverse section as dots. Each <‘ Kastchen ”? now resembles fundamentally the muscle-plate of the adult Lamprey ; and it will be noticed that each is a deve- lopment of what was a single cell. DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 339 The second variety of muscle-fibre met with in the Lamprey seems to be exclusively derived from the ventral unsegmented mesoblastic plate, and from the walls of the head cavities. The muscles with this origin are those which serve to move the lips, the velum and the other structures of the mouth, and certain muscles connected with the gill apparatus, and prob- ably the muscles of the eye. These latter have the same histological structure, but owing to the fact that the eye does not develope until the Lamprey stage, no eye muscies appear till very late in the life of the Ammoccete and I have conse- quently been unable to follow their development. The muscle-fibres of this second variety of muscle tissue, consist of long tubular cells, cylindrical in shape, with a medulla of clear substance which does not stain, and a cortex which is thickened at intervals by longitudinal rods. These give the cortex a beaded appearance in transverse section. The medulla contains the nucleus, which stains deeply. This is at first single, but subsequently divides until a row of nuclei occupy the axis of the muscle-fibre, in some cases so closely packed as almost to touch. It will be noticed that these muscle-fibres resemble in the minute structure the first stage in the development of the muscles forming the myomeres. These muscle-fibres are transverse striated. The fibres of the heart belong to this second variety, and are developed from the same part of the mesoblast. They, however, possess certain peculiarities. which will be described after the formation of the heart has been considered. The Heart. The first appearance of the body cavity as a space takes place in the region behind the posterior gill-cleft and in front of the liver. The part of the embryo lying in front of this region is at an early stage raised from the posterior half by the backward growth of the head fold, and the embryo lies within the egg-shell bent in half, the angle of the bend being just in that region where the heart is subsequently formed. By this means all those parts in front of the liver are free from the yolk-bearing cells, and the lining cells of the mesenteron all 340 ARTHUR HK. SHIPLEY. become columnar. In this anterior region the mesoblast soon unites ventrally. In the posterior region the ventral union of the mesoblast is delayed, the lateral plates of mesoblast lying between the yolk-cells and the epiblast end in a free edge, and until these edges unite, the yolk-cells are in contact with the epidermis ventrally. In the region between the liver and the last gill-slit the mesoblast splits at about the fifteenth day into a somatic and a splanchnic layer; between the two a well-developed body cavity appears. The former layer lines the body wall, the latter envelopes the alimentary canal. It forms a dorsal mesen- tery supporting that structure, and a well-marked ventral mesentery of considerable depth connecting the ventral wall of the intestine with the body wall. It is in this ventral mesen- tery that the heart is developed. The two layers forming the mesentery fuse dorsally and ventrally, but separate from one another in their middle, forming a cavity which is the lu- men of the heart (fig. 24). Subsequently both the mesentery connecting the heart with the alimentary canal—the meso- cardium—and the ventral one connecting the heart with the ventral body wall, atrophy and the heart lies as a tube uncon- nected with the surrounding structures (fig. 25). From the fact mentioned above that the mesoblast behind the heart has not split into somatic and splanchnic layers nor united ventrally, it will be seen that the cavity of the heart communicates posteriorly with the space between the veutral yolk-cells and the epidermis. Such a space would be equiva- lent to part of the segmentation cavity. Soon after the heart is formed such a space arises, and at once becomes crowded with cells destined to form blood-corpuscles (fig. 26). At first I was inclined to think that these cells were budded off from the yolk-cells, but more careful observation has led me to believe that they originate from the free edge of the lateral plates of the mesoblast, which as I mentioned above are growing down between the yolk-cells and the epiblast. These corpuscles are oval with large nuclei, and they usually contain at first one or two yolk granules which they soon absorb. DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 341 The cavity in which the corpuscles lie in great numbers is subse- quently shut off by the mesoblast as it grows downwards and becomes the subintestinal vein. It is from the first continuous with the posterior end of the heart, and the corpuscles soon pass from it into that organ. From the first appearance of the heart in the ventral mesentery its walls have been double ; the splanchnopleure having split into two layers, of these the outer is at first much the thicker consisting of cubical cells ; the inner layer is composed of comparatively flattened cells. The heart at first is a straight tube of the same length as the section of the body cavity in which it lies. Very soon, how- ever, it increases in length, and thus becomes slightly twisted ; at the same time two constrictions appear, dividing it into three chambers. The most posterior of these is the sinus venosus ; it is directly continuous with the space in which the corpuscles are developing. By this time this space has acquired definite walls by the downgrowth of the mesoblast in this region, and it may now be spoken of as the subintestinal vein. The liver which developes as a ventral outgrowth of the intestine first makes its appearance in this space, and when the latter gets closed off as a vein, the liver has become a branched gland projecting into it, so that the blood returning from the alimentary canal passes between the tubuliof the liver. Thus, from the very first an hepatic portal system is present. The tubuli of the liver do not appear to have any continuous meso- blastic coating, though here and there a flattened cell can be distinguished in the outside of a tubule. The venous sinus communicates by a narrow opening with the auricle or second chamber of the heart. This in its turn opens by a similar narrow opening into the ventricle. This latter opening is guarded by a pair of valves, which appear by the tenth day after hatching; they effectually prevent any regurgitation of the blood into the auricle. The walls of the ventricle have undergone a considerable change. From the cells of the inner lining a number of branched muscle-cells have been developed (fig. 36). These cells stretch across the cavity of the ventricle from side to side, and fuse and anas- VOL, XXVII, PART 3.— NEW SER. B B 342 ARTHUR BE. SHIPLEY. tomose with one another in a very complex manner. They contain numerous nuclei, and show a longitudinal striation though not a transverse one. The centre of the ventricle is comparatively free from them, but at the sides they form a spongy reticulum in the meshes of which corpuscles abound. The ventricle passes anteriorly into the ventral aorta, and at the point where the aorta passes into the solid tissue between the gills there is another pair of valves resembling the auriculo-ventricular ones. The ventral aorta, like the other vessels, arises by a split in the mesoblast which subse- quently acquires a definite wall. It passes forward as a single vessel in the ventral median line until it reaches the thyroid gland, and here it splits in two branches. Each branch then passes forward on one side of this body, and ends in the most anterior gill vessel. From the single part of the ventral aorta three pairs of vessels are given off, passing in front of the fifth, sixth, and seventh gill-slits respectively. The posterior wali of the seventh cleft bears no gill filaments, and has no vessel. From each side of the double part of the ventral aorta five vessels are given off, the four posterior of these pass in front of the first, second, third, and fourth gill-slits. The most anterior is the vessel which in the earlier stages passes in front of a gill-slit which subsequently disappears. In the older embryos, when the mouth is fully formed it runs along the base of the velum. The vessels after traversing the gills unite in the dorsal middle line to form the dorsal aorta; this runs backward to the posterior end of the body, lying just underneath the noto- chord. From its first appearance it gives off two transverse vessels in the neighbourhood of the pronephros; these supply the glomerulus. Anteriorly it gives off a pair of vessels to supply the upper lip, the carotids. In the older larvz the aorta gives off a vessel which passes dorsally up one myotome, then along the dorsal surface of the myomere behind it, and hence the blood is collected by a vein which returns it to the posterior cardinal down the next myomere. The larve are fairly transparent, and in each myotome these two opposite DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 343 currents can be seen, and along the top of each myomere a backwardly directed stream. In the tail the aorta splits, and one branch passes each side of the cloaca; they unite ventrally, and are continued forwards as the subintestinal vein. Before it splits it gives off a vessel which runs back along the base of the notochord to supply the tail; this may be termed the caudal artery. The blood from this is returned by a caudal vein which soon splits into the two posterior cardinal veins. These large veins run forward, one each side of the aorta: the duct of the pronephros runs in their wall. Anteriorly they unite with the anterior cardinals, and form two ducts of Cuvier which open into the sinus venosus. The anterior cardinals bring back blood from the head. The tubuli of the pronephros lie in their cavity, so that the pronephros, like the kidney of the Amphibia, has a double blood supply. The car- dinal veins do not appear till after the subintestinal vein, which for some little time is the only vein in the body. Later still a vessel appears in the right side of the intestine, opposite the subintestinal vein in the spinal fold; this, like the last named, passes through the liver. In my latest stages also there is an impaired vessel bringing blood back to the heart from the ventral region of the gills; this is mentioned by Balfour. The blood-corpuscles are of only one kind, large oval disc-like structures, with a well-marked nucleus. The protoplasm scarcely stains, but the nucleus assumes a deep colour. Owing to the transparency of the larva, the circulation can be watched with great ease. The walls of the vessels at first possess no elasticity, hence great regurgitation takes place, and the blood advances by a series of jerks. The valves at the anterior end of the ventricle and between the auricle and the ventricle prevent this affecting the blood in the heart. The heart begins to beat long before the cells exhibit any histological differentiation into muscles. The Pronephros. The first origin of the larval excretory system is by no means easy to make out, as it arises at a period when the embryo is 344 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. crowded with yolk. Scott has described it fully, and in most respects my observations confirm his. As he describes, the first structure to appear is the segmental duct which is at first solid. The cells forming this are derived from the mesoblast cells which lie between the already segmented dorsal part of the mesoderm and the ventral unsegmented portion. These cells form a solid cord lying between the mesoblast and the epiblast ; the cord continues to grow backward by a differen- tiation of the cells in situ. A few hours later a lumen appears in the centre of the cord by the separation of the cells; this soon becomes elliptical in section (fig. 11). It opens into the posterior part of the alimentary canal. From this account it will be seen that at first the segmental duct is between the mesoblast and epiblast; it, however, soon comes to occupy a deeper position by the growth of the sur- rounding tissue. So far we have only considered the duct in that part of its coufse where the body cavity is not yet deve- loped; but in the region of the heart, where the body cavity has already appeared, its origin seems to be somewhat different. The lumen of the segmental duct here becomes continuous with a groove in the parietal peritoneum, lying near the angle where the somatopleure and splanchnopleure diverge. When this groove closes it leaves four or five openings which persist as the openings of the ciliated funnels. This account of the origin of the ciliated funnels agrees with that of Fiirbringer, but differs from Scott’s, who describes the funnels arising as blind projections of the segmental duct which acquire an opening into the body cavity. Each funnel soon acquires cilia, which extend for some distance down its lumen, and are usually directed downwards towards the tubuli. The funnel is composed of large cubical cells with a large nucleus, at its lip it passes suddenly over into the flat cells of the peritoneal epithelium. At its base it is continuous with a duct which soon becomes elongated and coiled, and ultimately joins the segmental duct. The walls of the tubuli are composed. of large clear glandular cells. The posterior end of the seg- mental duct opens into the cloaca DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 345 The segmental duct throughout its course runs in close connection with the post-cardinal vein, lying in contact with it, almost in its wall in the under and inner side. In the anterior region this vein has so grown round the pro- nephros that the tubuli really le inside it (fig. 29). The tubuli are covered by a few flattened cells whose presence becomes more obvious about the twenty-fifth day by a deposit of dark brown pigment. The tubuli have thus a venous blood supply. The glomerulus on the other hand is supplied from the aorta. There is only one glomerulus on each side, stretching each side of the alimentary canal and extending through about the same space as the glandular part of the kidney. Hach glomerulus is a diverticulum of the peritoneum, which generally becomes sacculated ; it receives its blood by a single vessel on each side directly from the aorta. Since the time of Bowman it has been known that the kidneys of Fishes, Frogs, and Snakes have a double blood supply, the tubuli uriniferi being surrounded by a capillary net- work of vessels which receive their blood from the renal portal veins, and the glomerulus which is supplied with blood from the aorta by the renal artery. It is an interesting fact to find that a similar blood supply is present from the very first in such a temporary organ as the pronephros of the Lamprey. In the great majority of cases I found fine ciliated funnels in each pronephros. The whole gland did not extend over a greater space than that occupied by three myomeres, although in some cases the ciliated funnels, which were of some length, overlapped into a fourth myomere, but I was unable to coufirm the relationship alleged to exist between the number of ciliated funnels and the number of somites through which the pro- nephros extended. . The Skeleton. The skeletons of the oldest larva at my disposition consisted of the notochord derived from the endoderm, and of certain carti- Jages in the head and branchial region derived from the lateral mesoblast. The origin of the notochord has been completely 346 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. described by Calberla, Scott, and others, and I have nothing to add to their account. In the histological differentiation of the chord from a solid string of more or less cubical cells, to the vacuolated cylinder which forms the permanent notochord, there is a stage which is perhaps worth mentioning. In the early stages a transverse section of the chord shows portions of three or four cells, a little later these cells have pushed their way between one another and arranged themselves in such a way that they occupy the whole room inside the sheath of the notochord. Whilst in this condition vacuoles appear in the substance of the cells and for a day or two the notochord pre- sents very much the same structure as the notochord of Amphi- oxus. This is, however, soon replaced by the vacuolated appearance characteristic of the notochordal tissue of the higher Vertebrata (figs. 18 and 23). The posterior end of the notochord passes into the indifferent mass of tissue described in the tail. The anterior end is slightly curved downwards apparently by the increased vertical height of the brain. It ends just behind the infundibulum, its end being in contact with the posterior end of the nasal in- vagination. There is no trace that it has ever passed in front of this point, although in the young stages it reaches relatively almost as far forward as the nervous system. The relation of its anterior end to the brain hence appears to be due to the overgrowth of the nervous system anteriorly. The cartilage which composes the rest of the skeleton is characterised by the small amount of intercellular substance. This stains very deeply. ‘The cells are large with usually only one nucleus, though sometimes two. I have endeavoured to represent this structure in fig. 19. The branchial bases are the first part of the skeleton to appear. They arise about the twenty-fourth day as straight bars of cartilage lying external and slightly posterior to the branchial vessel. In their relation to the vessel they correspond with the extrabranchial bars of the Tadpole, and the Sharks. The true branchial bars run internal to the branchial vessel. The bars run behind the gill-slit to which they belong, and DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 347 there is no bar in front of the first persistent cleft. They are slightly curved inwards towards the median linein the middle part of their course where they bend round the external opening of the cleft. About the thirtieth day they fuse with one another ventrally and so two rods are formed which lie close together in the posterior half of their course but diverge round the thyroid. About the same time each bar sends forward two processes, one above and the other below the opening of the gill to which it belongs; these ultimately fuse with the pos- terior edge of the gill bar next in front. The processes of the most anterior bar fuse with each other. Dorsally the last six of the bars also become continuous (fig. 42), and form two longi- tudinal bars which run parallel and close to the notochord. The most anterior bar does not join this rod but sends a process inwards, serving to support the auditory capsule, which lies just in front of it directly over the first persistent gill-cleft. The first traces of the basi-cranial skeleton appear on the thirtieth day as two rods of cartilage, the trabecule (figs. 40). They he close against the notochord for their posterior two thirds, anteriorly, however, they diverge and surround the pituitary space. About six days after their first appearance the trabecule send out laterally a transverse bar of cartilage which passes out on each side in front of the auditory capsule, lying between the ganglia of the fifth and seventh nerves. Pro- fessor Parker has identified this as the rudiments of the pedicle and pterygoid. ‘They lie in the tissue of the bar which is in front of the first gill-cleft which has long ago disappeared. Immediately beneath the trabecule the carotid artery runs forward as an anterior continuation of the dorsal aorta. The trabeculz have become continuous with the dorsal end of the most anterior branchial bar, which is not united with the longi- tudinal bar formed from the fused dorsal end of the other six. The connection is very slight but is quite evident in sections. between this and the dorsal end of the second bar some little space exists, the latter when it commences lies at a slightly lower level than the trabecule. The above description represents the condition in my oldest 348 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. larva, fifty-two days (fig. 43). The further development of the Lamprey’s skull has been deseribed by Professor Parker in his great work on ‘The Skeleton of the Massipobranch Fishes,’ The Mesenteron. The cavity of the alimentary is formed by the invagination of the endoderm described in the first section of this article, when once found it does not disappear again, although in the region of the intestine it may be reduced to a slit by the pressure of the surrounding yolk-cells. The most anterior section, including the branchial region _ and that part of the intestine in front of the liver, is now separated from the rest by the raising of the head and neck from the remaining part of the embryo. The lining cells of this portion at once assume a columnar character ; the hypo- blastic cells in the region of the blastopore, or as it may now be termed the anus, also assume a similar form. But the cells in the middle part of the intestine still retain the features of the yolk-cells, those forming the roof of the enteron being however, rather more columnar than those of the floor and sides. In the head region almost the whole of the space inside the epiblast is taken up with the brain, which has a great depth, and with the notochord and the alimentary canal, which ends blindly in front. A small band of mesoblast lies on each side of the nervous system and notochord. This segments dorsally into a series of myomeres, the first lying close behind the ear. Ventrally the mesoblast has not grown down between the en- doderm, so that along the sides and under surface the hypoblast and epiblast are in contact. The first gill-slit appears, as Scott has described, about the twelfth or thirteenth day, the others arise eduring the next three or four days, the most posterior being the last formed. The gill-slits appear to me to be the result of the ventral downgrowth of mesoblast taking place only at certain places, these forming the gill-bars. Between each downgrowth the hypoblastic lining of the alimentary DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 349 canal remains in contact with the epiblast, and here the gill opening subsequently appears about the twenty-second day. Huxley was the first to point out that the embryo Lamprey possesses eight gill-slits, and his account has been confirmed by Scott and Dohrn, who, however, point out that the first slit remains closed, and does not open to the ex- terior, as Huxley described. Dohrn has further shown that the first or rudimentary gill-slit becomes converted in the ciliated groove encircling the mouth, which was first described by Anton Schneider in Ammocetes. Fig. 27 represents a longitudinal horizontal section of the head of a twenty-one days’ old embryo. The eight primitive gill-slits are here shown lined by columnar epithelium, which in the posterior seven is most flattened at those points where the opening will subsequently appear. The corresponding area in the first cleft, however, will be seen to be lined with very high columnar cells. These cells afterwards acquire cilia and come to lie in a deep groove. The branchial vessels have only appeared in the first gill- bars, but the cells which will be converted into the cartilagi- nous gill arches have already become distinct (47. 6.). About the twenty-second day a process begins to grow backward from the middle of each gill-bar into the gill-slit behind. This re- duces the slit to a <-shaped opening. After the opening to the exterior has been established the gill-bars overlap each other, the passage from the cavity of the mouth to the exterior being directed outwards and backwards. Each gill-bar acquires a few gill filaments, into which the blood courses. The whole is covered by a layer of thick columnar epithelium continuous with that lining the rest of the mouth, except cer- tain small areas, mostly at the end of the short filaments, where the epithelium has become suddenly thin, thus putting the blood into closer communication with the surrounding water. The columnar glandular-looking cells which line so much of the cavity of the mouth contain a number of very fine gran- 350 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. ules, which stain deeply with hematoxylin, giving the cell a very characteristic appearance. I have been unable to form any opinion as to the nature or fate of these granules. The ciliated ring mentioned above is shown in section in fig. 41, c.g. It lies close in front of the most anterior gill- bar; ventrally its two halves converge and run back as two parallel grooves to the opening of the thyroid gland in the ventral median line. The grooves here unite, and after receiv- ing the opening of the thyroid they continue as a single groove running in the ventral median line as far as the most posterior gill arch. Dorsally the grooves unite and become continuous with a median dorsal ridge, which is covered by high columnar cells, also ciliated. This ridge extends from the first gill arch to the commencement of the wsophagus. Anton Schneider describes a band of cilia running from this dorsal ridge on each side along each gill arch. This is not present in my oldest larva, but is no doubt formed later. Dohrn (23) has recently described the development of the thyroid so fully, and his paper is so beautifully illustrated, that it appears to me to be superfluous to describe again the origin of this organ. I can only confirm his results. He deals at length with the homology of the thyroid of Ammo- coetes, with the endostyle of Ascidians, and the hypobranchial ridge in Amphioxus. And the homology of the circumoral ciliated ring in Ammoceetes and Ascidians is also pointed out. To these homologies we may add, I think, that of the dorsal ciliated ridge of the young larval Lamprey to the dorsal lamella of Ascidians, and the hyperpharyngeal groove of Amphioxus. It isa curious fact, however, that in the last animal the form of the structure is reversed. We find ven- trally a ridge and dorsally a groove, whereas in Ammoccetes and Ascidians we have the ridge dorsal and the groove ventral. In spite of this, I think Dohrn’s arguments fully support the homology of the ventral organs, and the same reasoning holds good for the dorsal. The alimentary canal behind the branchial region may be divided into three sections. Langerhans has termed these DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 351 the stomach, mid-gut, and hind-gut, but as the most anterior of these is the narrowest part of the whole intestine, it would perhaps be better to call it cesophagus. This part of the ali- mentary canal lies entirely in front of the yolk, and is, with the anterior region which subsequently bears the gills, raised from the rest of the egg when the head is folded off. In my later larvee it is composed of a single layer of very high co- lumnar cells, and is ciliated throughout. Round this is a thin layer of cells, which, I imagine, give rise to the muscular coats. The whole is supported by a dorsal mesentery, each side of which lies the head kidney (fig. 25). The ciliated columnar cells are directly continuous with those covering the dorsal ridge of the branchial region, but not with those of the ventral groove; this later connection must arise subsequently, as Anton Schneider describes it in the fully-grown Ammocete. The mid-gut which follows the cesophagus is, in the younger stages, crowded with yolk granules. The cells of the roof soon acquire a columnar shape, whilst the ventral part consists of a mass of cubical cells, each crowded with yolk. By degrees the yolk is absorbed, and the cells assume the same character as those lining the cesophagus. The lumen of the mid-gut is very much larger than that of the esophagus, the alimentary canal expanding suddenly at the commencement ofthe former. The absorption of yolk takes place from before backward, so that lumen and walls of the fore part of the mid- gut assume their permanent size and form, whilst the posterior half is choked with yolk. The lining high columnar cells are ciliated and quite continous with those of the cesophagus. By the time the yolk is all absorbed a longitudinal invagi- nation of the wall of the mid-gut takes piace. This occurs anteriorly on the left side, but twisting through a quarter of circle it comes to lie in the ventral side posteriorly. The ridge thus formed reduces the lumen of the alimentary canal from a round to a reniform shape in section. In this ridge or spiral valve runs the subintestinal vein, which has become quite small and has lost its median ventral position. Around aoe ARTHUR KEK. SHIPLEY. this vessel, filling up the space between the two sides of the spiral valve, is a quantity of fatty tissue. The cilia on the inner face of the spiral valve are very evident. The lumen of the mid-gut is so large that almost the whole of the body cavity in that region of the Ammoceete is taken up by this part of the intestine; consequently the liver, the only gland opening into the mid-gut, is pushed forward and lies on each side and below the esophagus. This gland has its origin at a very early stage, about the fourteenth day, as an evagination of the mid-gut, whilst the latter is still crowded with yolk. The diverticulum thus produced grows out in the ventral side of the alimentary canal into that space between the hypoblast and epiblast which was mentioned above as being crowded with blood-corpuscles. This space subsequently becomes enclosed by definite walls by the downgrowth of the mesoblast in this region. It becomes the subintestinal vein which still continues to supply the liver with venous blood. The single diverticulum soon begins to branch, and at an early stage one of the branches becomes differentiated from the others, acquires a large lumen, and forms the gall-bladder. The cells forming the liver are cubical with large nuclei, they do not appear to have a definite outer layer of flattened cells, though occasionally such a cell is present. In the older larve the gall-bladder has a great relative size. It lies embedded in the liver on the right side of the cesophagus. The bile-duct runs from it above the mid-gut, bending down to enter the mid-gut in the spiral valve on the left side. The hind-gut is smaller than the mid-gut, its anterior limit is marked by the termination of the spinal valve, which does not extend into this region. The two segmental ducts open into it just where it turns ventrally to open to the exterior by a median ventral anus. Its walls are in this region slightly puckered. The cells lining it are not so high as in the other parts of the intestine, but more cubical. Its lumen is from an early stage lined with cells which have lost their yolk, and it is in wide communication with the exterior from the first. This condition seems to be, as Scott DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 353 suggests, connected with the openings of the ducts of the pro- nephros, for this gland is completed and seems capable of functioning long before any food could find its way through the mid-gut, or indeed before the stomodzeum has opened. The stomodzeum has a very early origin ; it commences on the fifteenth day as an invagination of ectoderm against the blind anterior end of the fore-gut. This gradually deepens and attains a very large size, partly due to great development of the upper lip, which grows forward and downward to con- stitute the large hooded structure which is so characteristic of the Ammocete. The greater part of this hood consists of simple muscle-fibres which interlace and cross one another in a diagonal direction. The lower lip does not reach so far for- ward as the upper (figs. 84 and 35). About the twentieth day the velum begins to appear in the posterior angle of the sto- modeum. This structure is formed by two grooves which gradually deepen and cut off a flap of tissue on each side of the middle line. These two grooves, shown in fig. 27, are not very deep. The tissue between them is broken through the next day so that the two lateral folds that remain are covered on their anterior face by epiblast, and on the greater part of their posterior face by hypoblast (fig. 28). Subsequently the meso- blast in these two flaps develope into muscle-fibres, and in the young larva a constant current is kept up by them, passing in at the mouth and out at the gill-clefts. This current is easily demonstrated by the aid of a little Indian ink suspended in the water. On the twenty-third day two tentacles begin to grow out from the under surface of the upper lip, one each side of the middle line; a little later two more appear on the sides, but placed more posteriorly ; later still two more appear behind the level of the last ; these are situated at the junction of the lower hip with the upper. Finally, a median tentacle appears in the ventral middle line. This last is far longer than the others and from its base a ridge, which is at first low, but increases in height posteriorly, extends back between the ventral portion of the ciliated ring (figs. 40 and 41). The number of tentacles B04 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. is afterwards increased by a pair of new ones arising between each of those already formed. The tentacles subsequently become branched (fig. 39). With regard to the mesoblast of the head I have little to add to the descriptions of Balfour and Scott. The area over which the gills extend at their first appearance extends to the posterior boundary of the sixth myomere. The most anterior myomere is situated close behind the ear, and the ear lies above the hyobranchial or first persistent gill-cleft. So that at their first appearance the six posterior gill-clefts cor- respond in their extent with the six anterior myomeres. As the larva grows the gill region appears to elongate with rela- tion to the muscular myomeres, so in my latest larva there are about nine myomeres over the area of the six gills (fig. 43). These anterior myomeres become V-shaped with the open angles directed forwards; turned the opposite way to those of Amphioxus, The mesoblast between the gills arranges itself into head cavities (fig. 21), and as Balfour and Scott have already shown, there are two head cavities in front of the hyomandi- bular cleft. These are at first continuous, but with the for- mation of the stomodzum they separate. One becomes pre- oral and obviously corresponding with the preemandibular head cavity of Elasmobranchs; the other with the mandi- bular (fig. 21). The walls of these cavities ultimately form the skeleton of the gill arches, the muscles of which are all of the tubular kind. Owing to the rudimentary condition of the eye in Ammoceetes, no eye-muscles are present and conse- quently it is impossible to say whether or no they are derived from the walls of the head cavities, but the researches of Stannius and Langerhans have shown that they possess the same histological characters as the muscles of the gills and upper lip. The Central Nervous System. The development of the central nervous system has been described above up to the stage when the central canal has DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 3855 first appeared. The lumen is at first circular in outline, and the walls of the canal of uniform thickness (fig. 11). Ulti- mately in the region of the body the lumen becomes elon- gated and slit like (fig. 24); in the anterior end the Inmen widens into the variously shaped cavities which form the ventricles of the brain. The cells forming the walls of the canal are primarily more or less cubical, but they soon become spindle shaped, except those which form the roof and the floor of the central canal. These are formed of a single layer of short columnar cells. The canal is in the youngest stages proportionately very much larger than in the later; its size is diminished and its form altered by the thickenings which take place in different parts of the brain. The white matter first makes its appearance on the eighteenth day as two thin bands, one on each side of the brain and spinal cord (fig. 37). Later these unite in the ventral side and form an anterior commissure. After the appearance of the white matter the ganglion cells lose their spindle-shaped outline and become again circular. The cranial flexure is very slight; the anterior end of the brain is, however, slightly bent down, and with it the anterior end of the notochord (fig. 23). About the sixteenth day considerable changes take place in the brain; from the anterior and ventro-lateral angles of the fore-brain two diverticula are given off; these are the optic vesicles (fig. 30). They continue to grow upwards and back- wards till their blind end reaches a position behind and above the anterior end of the notochord. At the blind end of the diverticulum a knob is formed by the outer face proliferating cells, which form a multicellular retinal layer. The posterior face later on developes pigment in its cells. The lens is budded off from the inside of the single layer of epidermis, and lies as a flattened mass of cells close against the retinal layer (fig. 40). The stalk of the primary vesicle becomes solid by its walls coalescing on all sides, and forms the optic nerves. At their origin these nerves form a commissure projecting into the cavity of the fore-brain 306 ARTHUR E,. SHIPLEY. on its ventral side; by the twenty-second day this optic chiasma is covered in by a single layer of ganglion cells. It is this body that Dohrn has by mistake figured as the Tuber cinereum (21). The commissure is shown in transverse section in fig. 39; the lumen of the infundibulum is seen below it, the cavity of the fore-brain above. About the same time that the optic vesicles commence to be given off from the anterior end of the brain a median dorsal evagination also appears. It was mentioned above that in the median line, both dorsally, ventrally, and in front, the central canal is enclosed by a single layer of more or less columnar cells, whilst the lateral walls are thick. This single layer is interrupted ventrally by the formation of the optic chiasma. Dorsally it is produced on the sixteenth day by the evagina- tion in question, which is the rudiment of the pineal gland (fig. 31). The walls of the pineal gland then consist at first of a single layer of cells forming a hollow sac which pushes its way between the brain and the epidermis, spreading out on all sides (fig. 31). At first its lumen is continuous with that of the fore-brain, but ultimately, by the folding of its walls, its cavity is obliterated and the communication with the lumen of the fore-brain is shut off. The eighteenth day, two days after the first appearance of the optic vesicles and the pineal gland, is the earliest date on which I have been able to recognise the appearance of any division into fore-, mid-, and hind-brain. On this day the single layer of cells roofing the central canal becomes folded in the manner indicated in fig. 23. This takes place at about the level of the attachment of the velum, a little in front of the ear. In larva of fifty-two days, this groove has not changed its form, but has become deeper. The division between the fore- and hind-brain is by no means so well marked; indeed, I have been unable to find any external groove, although it has been described by previous writers. Longitudinal horizontal sections through the brain show, however, that just behind the infundibulum and pineal gland the walls thin out so that the lumen appears diamond DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 857 shaped. This thin wall I conclude makes the division between the optic thalami and the crura cerebri. The hind-brain and mid-brain resemble each other closely in structure, the mid-brain being only a trifle larger. Their cavity, which is at first slit like, becomes triangular by the lateral growth of the roof which pushes the side walls apart dorsally (figs. 40 and 41). This thin roof extends back as far as the second gill-cleft, after which it disappears and the nervous system has the structure represented in fig. 42. About the forty-fifth day a median longitudinal fold appears in the thin roof; this is the first of the numerous folds found in the roof of the mid- and hind-brain of the adult (fig. 41). The fore-brain still has its thick side walls, the optic thalami. Just in front of the stalk of the pineal gland a commissure of transverse fibres is found which runs from side to side on about the twenty-third day. This commissure corresponds with the Commissura tenuisima, described by Ahlborn in his exhaustive work on the brain of the adult Lamprey. It also probably corresponds with the commissure found by Balfour in Scyllium situated just in front of the base of the pineal gland. Osborn has recently described a similar commissure in the brain of the Amphibia, Menopoma, Meno- branchus, Amphiuma, and Rana, and I have adopted the name he proposes for it, the Superior Commissure. The com- missure of the pineal stalk in the Mammalian brain seems to occupy the same relative position. This superior commissure is at first covered with but a few ganglion cells, but these afterwards increase until two bodies are formed, the Ganglia Habenule. The left one is very small (fig. 39), but the right is a structure of considerable size, projecting downwards and back- wards, and reducing the lumen of the fore-brain to a Y-shaped slit. These bodies have been fully described by Ahlborn in the adult ; it is interesting to note that the curious asymmetry they possess is present from their first appearance. No other commissure has made its appearance by the fifty-second day. The cerebral hemispheres show some signs of appearing as lateral outgrowths in my oldest larvae, but no trace of paired VOL, XXVIT, PART 3,—NEW SER. Gc 358 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. lateral ventricles are to be seen. The lateral outgrowths of the hemispheres embrace between them a mass of tissue formed at the back of the olfactory pit, which resembles in every way nerve matter. This structure is shown in figs. 33, 34, and 35, drawn from a series of sections taken through the head of a fifty-two days’ larva. This tissue in question appears to con- sist of ganglion cells. It is traversed by a canal which ends blindly behind and opens by the median nasal pit in front. Posteriorly it is continuous with a sheet of tissue which is de- scribed by Dohrn and Scott as giving rise to the pituitary body (fig. 39). Unfortunately my larve were not sufficiently old to enable me to determine whether this mass of tissue comes into closer relation with the brain and forms the olfac- tory lobes, or whether, as seems more probable from what we know of the development of these structures in other animals, it forms only the peripheral portion of the olfactory apparatus. About the twenty-fifth day some of the ganglion cells in the postero-lateral angle of the grey matter become much larger than the surrounding ones. These cells are particularly fre- quent in that part of the hind-brain lying between the audi- tory capsule. They probably develope into the “outer large cells” of Reissner. With regard to the development of the cranial nerves, I have no observations on the origin of the olfactory nerve, as this apparently does not arise till a much later stage than that attained by my oldest larvee. The origin of the optic nerve as an outgrowth of the brain has been described above. Owing to the rudimentary condition of the eye, the muscles of that organ are not developed, and consequently the third, fourth, and sixth nerves do not arise till a much later stage. This leaves the fifth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth nerves to be considered. The origin of these nerves is much obscured by the yolk which crowds the cells of the embryo at the time they first appear. On the seventeenth day the first origin of the ganglia in the fifth and seventh nerve is seen. The ganglia arise as proliferations of the epiblast. By this means a knob of cells DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 309 is formed, which arises at about the level of the notochord (fig. 32). This heap of cells arises close behind the lens of the eye, but seems to be distinct from it. It is divided into a larger anterior part, which belongs to the fifth nerve, and a smaller posterior portion, which forms the ganglion of the seventh. The roots of the nerves seem to me—though it is difficult to be certain on this point—to arise as outgrowths from a neural ridge in the lateral surface of the brain; these grow down and fuse with epiblastic thickening. This origin of the roots of the nerves corresponds with that described by Balfour, Marshall, Van Wijhe, and Beard, in the Elasmobranchs, and differs from what occurs in the Am- phibia as described by Spencer, where the nerve also is derived from the inner layer of epiblast. As Spencer sug- gests, this is probably due to the presence of a double layer of epiblast, the epidermic and nervous, in the Amphibia. By the nineteenth day the ganglion of the fifth nerve has completely separated off from the skin. It has now divided into two portions, which have, however, a common root taking its origin from the hind-brain just in front of the ear. The most anterior part forms a large ganglion on the root of a nerve which runs over the eye (fig. 22). This is the oph- thalmic ganglion, and the nerve is the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminus; it probably corresponds with the portio- profunda of the ophthalmicus superficialis of the Elasmobranchs. Immediately behind the ophthalmic ganglion, but quite dis- tinct from it, lies the ganglion of the other half of the fifth nerve. From this a mandibular nerve proceeds to run close behind the mouth, and later a maxillary branch appears pre- orally. In the angle between these ganglia the eye lies. The nerve connecting the ophthalmic with the main ganglion of the fifth nerve, described by Ahlborn in the adult, is not found at this stage, and both the ganglia are of approximately equal size. The seventh nerve arises behind the fifth and enters its ganglion, which, when separated off from the epiblast, lies close in front of the ear capsule (fig. 38). In early stages, 360 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. whilst the most anterior gill-cleft—spiracle—is still present, the nerve can be seen passing from the ganglia between the rudimentary gill-cleft and the first persistent one—the hyo- branchial. Later on the ganglion increases in size, and ex- tends round the under and inner face of the auditory sac towards the ganglion of the ninth nerve, but it never quite reaches it, and the connection between the ganglion of the seventh and of the tenth nerves must be of: later origin. Neither does the ganglion of the seventh fuse with that of the fifth, though they are close together, and the root of the seventh does not enter the ear capsule to leave it again, as is the case in the adult. After the appearance of the ciliated ring in the place of the first gill-cleft, the seventh nerve sup- plies this structure. A few fibres from the brain enter the recessus labyrinthi of the ear; these arise close to the root of the seventh, and constitute the eighth nerve. The ganglia of the ninth and tenth nerves would seem to arise from a mass of cells split off from the epiblast close behind the ear. At a little later stage the ninth nerve has its ganglion lying close against the posterior boundary of the ear ; the nerve is continued along the posterior wall of the first persistent cleft, the hyobranchial. The ganglion seems to be still connected with the ganglion of the tenth nerve. This is a very large structure; it lies more dorsally than the others and it is in close connection with the mid-brain, having as yet deve- loped no root. Behind it and connected with it lies a ganglion which is situated dorsally above the second persistent gill-cleft ; from this chord the main branch of the vagus is continued backward, lying just external to the anterior cardinal vein (fig. 42). In front of each remaining cleft the chord bears a large ganglion, so that, counting the first, there are six distinct ganglia borne on the vagus. Ihave not been able to trace the fibres of this nerve beyond the last gill-cleft, but my friend Mr. Ransom, of Trinity College, tells me he has traced the vagus into the heart in the adult Petromyzon. Each of the ganglia in the vagus supplies the gill-cleft behind which it lies. DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 361 There is no trace of the ramus lateralis of the vagus even in my oldest larve. The ganglion on the ninth nerve lies in front of the first myomere, between that and the ear, whilst that of the vagus lies between the first and second. The first dorsal root of the spinal nerves with its ganglion lies between the third and fourth myomere. Behind this there is a dorsal ganglion lying opposite each myotome. Sagemehl (17) has described very correctly the origin of the spinal nerves. The dorsal roots with their ganglia arise from a neural ridge which is at first of the same size all along. From this the ganglia begin to grow out about the eighteenth day, intersegmentally, that is opposite the myotomes. The- ganglia are in connection with one another for some time by a longitudinal commissure. This commissure appears to consist of the remains of the neural ridge; it ultimately disappears, as in Elasmobranchs. The dorsal nerves, after leaving the ganglia, run into the myotomes and eventually, I believe, reach the skin, though on this point I cannot be quite certain. On the other hand the ventral roots consist of nerve-fibres only, and run straight into the myomeres. They appear, according to Sagemehl, very soon after the first appearance of white matter in the chord, and they never have any connection with the dorsal roots. The resemblance between the distribution of the spinal nerves of this larva with those of Amphioxus as described by Rohon is very striking. The ear is formed, as Scott has described, from an invagina- tion of the epiblast. This appears very early about the four- teenth day. It soon deepens and becomes completely shut off, consisting then of an oval vesicle with a dorsally placed stalk, the recessus labyrinthi. This last is the remains of the duct leading to the exterior. The ear is in the same condition in my oldest larve. No signs of the semicircular canals have appeared. The epithelium lining the vesicle is high and columnar; about the twenty-second day certain patches of the epithelium become higher than the others and the cells develope each a very large cilium which projects into the cavity and 362 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. bears a knob at its free end (fig. 41). About the same time a number of small concretions appear in the ear. These form the numerous spherical otoliths. Summary. I have now described the structure of the chief organs in my oldest larva, and I propose to conclude this paper by a brief summary of the results obtained. In the first place the mesoblast is not completed ventrally by a layer of cells split off from the hypoblastic yolk-cells, as Scott has described. But the ventral mesoblast is formed by the downgrowth of the mesoblastic plates, which ultimataly meet and unite in the ventral middle line. The blastopore does uot close up, as later observers have maintained, but, as Max Schultze described thirty years ago, it persists as the anus. There is no neurenteric canal, though a solid strand of tissue proceeds back from the alimentary canal and fuses with an indifferentiated mass of cells, into which the nervous system and mesoblast also pass. The lumen of the alimentary canal is that of the mesenteron ; it does not become obliterated during larval life. In its anterior end the hypoblast remains in connection with the epiblast at certain points, and here the gill-clefts arise ; between these the mesoblast grows down and forms the gill-bars. The origin of the ciliated ring and the hypopharyngeal groove and hyper- pharyngeal bar are also described, and the ciliated condition of the esophagus and stomach. The “ muscle- plates,” whose structure is so peculiar in the Lamprey, arise each from a single cell of the mesoblastic somites. This increases in size, slides in between the neigh- bouring cells, and ultimately occupies the whole of the space between two myotomes. Its nucleus divides until each cell contains several nuclei. Striated fibrils then appear and in- creases till the whole ‘ muscle-plate ” consists of little else be- sides these fibrils, squeezing between them a few nuclei. These “ muscle-plates ” arise from the segmental half of the meso- blast ; the muscles of the gills, lips, and probably of the eye, DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 363 have a different structure and arise from the ventral unseg- mented part. The blood-corpuscles arise from the ventral free edges of the mesoblast, before they unite in the ventral middle line, they collect in a large sinus just behind the heart. The heart appears in the ventral mesentery, formed by the union of the lateral mesoblastic plates ; at first its lumen is continuous with the sinus just mentioned. This sinus lies between the hypo- blastic yolk-cells and the epiblast; it subsequently acquires walls and forms part of the subintestinal vein. The ciliated funnels of the pronephros are left as apertures by the segmental duct which in its anterior end is formed from agroove. The groove closes up at intervals, leaving four or five openings which become the funnels. They do not arise as blind projections from the duct, which subsequently, acquire ciliated openings. From the first the pronephros has a double blood supply, pure blood from the aorta passing to the glomerulus, and impure blood in the cardinal veins surrounding the tubuli. The early development of the skeleton is described up to the stage where Professor Parker commenced his researches. The canal of the central nervous system developes after the neural chord has separated off from the epidermis; it does not appear to be lined by any invaginated epidermis, as Calberla and Scott maintained. The first sign of differentiation of the parts of the brain is the formation on the sixteenth day of the optic vesicles and pineal gland. The division into fore-, mid-, and hind-brain appears soon after, but the fore- and mid-brain are not sepa- rated by any well-marked groove. The first transverse com- missure to appear is situated just in front of the stalk of the pineal gland. It forms the superior commissure of Osborn. Afterwards the ganglion cells thicken round it and form the asymmetrical ganglia habenule. The ganglia on the fifth, seventh, ninth, and tenth nerves are derived from epiblastic thickenings. Their roots probably arise as outgrowths from the neural ridge. The ganglion of the 364 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. fifth divides into two parts, the ophthalmic and mandibular ; these have a common root. The seventh nerve at its first appearance supplies the first or spiracular gill-cleft ; when this is converted into the ciliated ring it continues to be supplied by the seventh nerve. The connection between the fifth, seventh, and tenth nerve ganglia does not exist and must be of later origin. The tenth nerve has a large ganglion on its root and bears a ganglion above each of the last six gill-clefts. No trace of the ramus lateralis is to be seen. The origin of the ganglia on the cranial nerves has no relation to the sense-organs of the skin; these have not appeared even in my oldest larva. LIveERATURE REFERRED TO. (1) 1836. Jon. Miitter.—‘ Vergleichende Anatomie der Myxinoiden, der Cyclostomen mit durchbohrten Gaumen,’ Berlin. (2) 1851. Srannrus.—“ Ueber den Bau den Muskeln bei Petromyzon fluviatilis,” ‘ Gottinger Nachrichten,’ 1851. (3) 1856. Aue. Mitier.—“ Ueber der Entwicklung der Neunaugen,” ‘Miiller’s Archiv,’ 1856. (4) 1856. Max Scuuttz.—‘ Die Entwickelungsgeschichte von Petromy- zon Planeri,’ Haarlem. (5) 1864. Ave. Mijiter.—* Beobachtungen iiber die Befruchtungserschein- ungen im Ki der Neunaugen,” ‘ Verhandl. d. Konigsberger Phys.-dkonom. Gesellsch.’ (6) 1867. GrenAcHER.— Beitrage zur Erkenntniss der Muskeln der Cyclo- stomen und Leptocardier,” ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xvii. (7) 1870. Owssannixow.— The Development of Petromyzon fluvia- tilis’ (Russian). (8) 1878. Paut LancErnans.—“ Untersuchungen iiber Petromyzon Planeri,” Freilung, i B., 1873. (9) 1873. Witu. Mtrier.— Ueber die Hypobranchialrinne der Tunika- ten und deren Vorhandsein bei Amphioxus und den Cyelo- stomen,” ‘Jen. Zeit. f. Med. u. Naturwiss.,’ Bd. vii. (10) 1875. Witn. Mitter.—* Ueber das Urogenitalsystem des Amphioxus und der Cyklostomen,” ‘ Jen. Zeit. f. Med. u. Naturwiss.,’ Bd. ix. DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON (11) 1877. (12) 1877. (13) 1878. (14) 1879. (15) 1880. (16) 1881. (17) 1882. (18) 1882. (19) 1883. (20) 1883. (21) 1883. (22) 1884. (23) 1885. FLUVIATILIS. 365 E. Carpurta.—* Der Befruchtungsvorgang beim Petromyzon Planeri,” ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xxx. HE. Carperta.—* Zur Entwicklung des Medullarrohres u. der Chorda dorsalis der Teleostier und der Petromyzonten,”’ ‘Morph. Jahrbuch,’ Bd. iii. KuprrerR UND Brenecxe.— Der Vorgang der Befruchtung am Ki der Neunaugen,” ‘ Festschrift zur Feier von Th. Schwann,’ Konigsberg. Anton ScHNEIDER.—‘ Beitrage zur vergleichenden Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Wirbelthiere,’ Berlin, 1879. W. B. Scorr.—* Vorlaufige Mittheilung. ib. d. Entwicklungs- geschichte d. Petromyzonten,” ‘ Zool. Anzeiger,’ Nos. 63 and 64. Nvrt.—“ Recherches sur le développement du Petromyzon planeri,” ‘Archives de Biologie,’ T. ii. SaceMenL.—‘ Untersuchungen iiber die Entwicklung der Spinal- nerven,’ Dorpat, 1882. W. B. Scort.—* Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Petro- myzonten,” ‘Morph. Jahrbuch,’ Bd. vii. W. K. Parker, “On the Skeleton of the Marsipobranch Fishes,” “ Phil) Trans; Part 1, 1883. AHNLBORN.—“ Untersuchungen tiber das Gehirn der Petromyzon- ten,” ‘Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’? Bd. xxxix. Doury.— Die Entstehung der Hypophysis bei Petromyzon Planeri,” ‘ Mitth. aus der Zool. Stat. zu Neapel.,’ Bd. iv. Autporn.—< Ueber den Ursprung und Austritt der Hirnnerven von Petromyzon,” ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xl. Dourn.— Die Thyroidea bei Petromyzon, Amphioxus und Tuni- caten,” ‘ Mitth. aus der Zool. Stat. zu Neapel., Bd. vi. 366 ARTHUR E. SHTPLEY. EXPLANATION OF PLATES XXVI, XXVII, XXVIII, and XXIX, Illustrating Mr. Arthur E. Shipley’s Paper on “ Some Points in the Development of Petromyzon fluviatilis.” Reference Letters. a. Anus. a.c. Anterior cardinal. ao. Aorta. au. Ear. aur. Auricle. b.c. Body cavity. 4/. c. Blood-corpuscles. dp. Blastopore. 4Gr.'-dr.8 First to eighth gill-clefts. 67.4. Skeleton of branchial bars. 47.v. Vessels of bran- chial bars. c. Cerebral hemispheres. c.g. Ciliated groove. a. Dorsal fin. d. 1. Dorsal lamella. d.m. Dorsal mesentery. e. Hye. e.g. Egg membrane. ep. Epiblast. . 6. Fore-brain. fg. Fore-gut. g. Groove between mid- and hind-brain. g. 4. 2. Left ganglion habenule. g. 4. 7. Right ganglion ha- benule. g/. Glomerulus. g.z. Ganglion cells at base of olfactory invagination. Ah. Heart. Ad. Head. Ad. c. Head-cavities. 4.6. Hind-brain. hy. Hypo- blast. 7¢. Iter a tertio ad quartum venticulum. ¢zf Infundibulum. Ui. ¢. Liver tubules. 7.7/7. Lower lip. J. ¢. Lamina terminalis. m. Mesenteron. m.6. Mid-brain. m. br. Muscle of branchial bar. mes. Unsegmented mesoblast. mes. som. Mesoblastic somites. m./. Muscle-fibre of heart. m.g. Mid-gut. m. Muscle-plate. my. Myomere. x. Notochord. za. Olfactory invagination. n.r. Neural ridge. uw. Nucleus of muscle-plate. 0. e. Ciliated epithelium lining nasal invagination. op. ch. Optic chiasma. op. Ophthalmic ganglion. op. th. Optic thalami. op.v. Optic vesicle. p.g. Postanal gut. pix. Pineal gland. pit. Pituitary body. pr. Primitive streak. +. 7. Recessus labyrinthi. s. c. Segmentation cavity. s. cm. Superior commissure. s.d. Segmental duct. sm.pl. Somatopleure. sp.c. Spinal cord. sp. gl. Spinal ganglion. sp. pl. Splanchnopleure. st. Stomodeum. s.v. Sinus venosus. ¢. Tentacles. 7h. Thyroid gland. ¢. Trabecule. ¢ub. Tubule of pronephros. a. 7. Upper lip. v. Velum. v. ao. Ventral aorta. ven. Ventricle. v./f. 6. Cavity of fore- brain. v. 4. 6. Cavity of hind-brain. v.7. Ventral ridge in mouth. vv. Valves of the heart. y.c. Yolk-cells. V.g. Ganglion of fifth nerve. V.g.e. Fpiblastic ingrowth to form ganglion of fifth nerve. VJI. g. Ganglion of seventh nerve. X.g. Ganglion of tenth nerve. PLATE XXVI. Fic. 1.—Spermatozoa of Petromyzon fluviatilis. Fig. 2.—Segmenting ovum at the completion of the third or equatorial fur- row. e.g. Egg membrane. Fic. 3.—Segmenting ovum, showing the next two vertical furrows which have divided the upper cells and are extending into the lower. DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 367 Fic. 4.—Ovum after the invagination is complete, twelve days old, showing the blastopore, dp., at posterior end of the neural ridge, x. r. Fic. 5.—Transverse section through ovum of thirty-six hours. ep. Epiblast. s.c. Segmentation cavity. y.c. Yolk-cells. Fie. 6.—Transverse section through ovum of forty-eight hours. s. ¢. Seg- mentation cavity. ep. Epiblast. y.c. Yolk-cells. Fic. 7.—Transverse section through ovum of sixty-seven hours. Fie. 8.—Transverse section through ovum of eighty-six hours, showing epiblast gradually thinning out. Fig. 9.—Longitudinal section through commencing gastrula, 136 hours. bp. Blastopore. hy. Hypoblast. y.c. Yolk-cells. m. Mesenteron. s.c. Seg- mentation cavity. Fic. 10.—Section through embryo of about the same stage as Fig. 4. bp. Blatsopore. y.c. Yolk-cells. Ad. Head. Fic. 11.—Transverse section through the body of an embryo just before hatching, seventeenth day. sp.c. Spinal cord. 2. Notochord. m. Me- senteron. mes. Mesoblast. s. d. Segmental duct. Zeiss’s A, oc. 2, cam. luc. Fic. 12.—Transverse section through embryo of thirteenth day. sp. ¢. Spinal cord. 2. Notochord. mes. Mesoblast. m. Mesenteron. y.c. Yolk-cells. Zeiss’s A, oc. 2, cam. luc. Fic. 13.—Transverse section through embryo of fourteen days. Letters asin Fig. 12. Zeiss’s A, oc. 2, cam. luc. Fie. 14.—Transverse section through tail of larva twenty days old. Sp. C. Spinal cord. 2. Notochord. p.g. Solid postanal gut. mes. Mesoblast. dp. Blastopore. d./. Dorsal fin. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3, cam. luc. Fic. 15.—Transverse section from the same series as Fig. 14, but posterior to blastopore. d./f. Dorsal fin. mes. Mesoblast. pr. Fused tissue of noto- chord, spinal cord, and postanal gut, or primitive streak. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3, cam. luc. Fig. 16.—Transverse section of embryo just before hatching, seventeen days, through region of blastopore. dp. Blastopore. sp. c. Spinal cord. x. Notochord. y.c. Yolk-cells. Fie. 17.—Longitudinal section of embryo, showing formation of somites. n. Notochord. mes. som. Mesoblastic somites. sp.c. Spinal cord. d./, dorsal fin. Fic. 18.—Longitudinal section of embryo just before hatching. sp. c. Spinal cord. my. Myomere. sm. pl. Somatopleuric layer of somite. sp. p/. Splanch- nopleuric layer. 2. Notochord. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3, cam. luc. Fic. 19.—A piece of the cartilage of a branchial bar. Fic. 20.—A longitudinal vertical section through the tail of a larva twenty- 368 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. one days old. a. Anus. p.g. Solid postanal gut. x. Notochord. sp. ¢. Spinal cord. pr. Primitive streak. y.c. Yolk-cells. - Fic. 21.—A longitudinal section through side of head of seventeen days’ embryo, showing the first three evaginations to form gill-clefts, and the true head-cavities. aw. Har. Ad. c’. aud hd. ec’. The first and second head-cavity. br., br?., and dr3, The first rudiments of gill-clefts. 7. v. The vessels of gills. s¢. Stomodzum. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3. PLATE XXVII. Fie. 22.—A longitudinal section through side of head of a larva twenty- one days old. au. Har. e. Hye. dr'., dr?., br’., br*. The first to fourth primary gill-clefts. 4.6. Hind-brain. ops. Ophthalmic ganglion. V. g. Ganglion in main branch of fifth nerve. Fic. 23.—A median longitudinal section through the head of a larva twenty- one days old. pin. Pineal gland. op.ch. Optic chiasma. if. Infundibulum. n. Notochord. st. Stomodeum. 477. Second primitive gill-cleft. ¢. Thyroid gland. za. Olfactory invagination. pi¢. Pituitary invagination. m. 6, Mid- brain. #%.%. Hind-brain. g. Groove between mid- and hind-brain. J. é. Lamina terminalis. Fic. 24.—Transverse section through the body of a larva of twenty days. sp.c. Spinal cord. fg. Fore-gut. . Notochord. som. pl. Somatopleure. sp.pl. Splanchnopleuric layers of myomeres. 0. ¢. Body cavity. 4%. Heart. c.f. Ciliated funnel. s. d. Segmental duct. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3, cam. luc. Fic. 25.—Transverse section through trunk of larva about twenty-four days. Letters as in Fig, 24, and ao. Aorta. a.c. Anterior cardinal. d.m. Dorsal mesentery. sp. gl. Spinal ganglion. g/. Glomerulus. Zeiss’s C, oc. 1, cam. luc. Fic. 26.—Section through embryo, one day before hatching, seventeen days old, cut whilst in the egg-shell. 4 Heart. sp.pl. Splanchnopleure. sm.pi. Somatopleure. 477. and ér*. Seventh and eighth gill-clefts. Ad. Head-cavities behind these. y.c. Yolk-cells. m.g. Mid-gut. 6. c¢. Body cavity. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3, cam. luc. Fic. 27.—Longitudinal horizontal section through a larva about twenty-two days. dr!.—dér*, The eight primary gill-clelts. dr. v. Vessels of gills. dr. 6. Branchial bars. jf. g. Fore-gut. ¢ub. Tubule of pronephros. s¢. Stomodeum. v. Velum. g.. Ganglion cells at base of nasal invagination. op. ch. Optic chiasma. iz/. Infundibulum. v./. 6. Cavity of fore-brain. x. Notochord. Zeiss’s B, oc. 1, cam. luc. Fic. 28.—Longitudinal horizontal section through larva of thirty-six days. u.l. Upper lip. v. Velum. 7. Thyroid gland. 2. ao. Ventral aorta. ven. DEVELOPMENT OF PETROMYZON FLUVIATILIS. 369 Ventricle. aur. Auricle. vv. Valves. s.v. Sinus venosus. Ji. ¢. Liver tubules. m.g. Mid-gut. ér. 4. Branchial bars. v. r, Ventral ridge. my, Myomere. Zeiss’s A, oc. 1, cam. lue. Fig. 29.—Transverse section through pronephros of larva of forty-seven days. x. Notochord. m.p. Muscle-plates. xz. Nucleus. ao. Aorta. a. c. Anterior cardinal. g/. Glomerulus. ¢wd, Tubules. s. d. Segmental duct. bl. c. Blood-corpuscles. /. gy. Fore-gut. d.m. Dorsal mesentery. Zeiss’s D, oc. 1, cam. lue. Fic. 30.—Transverse section through fore-brain of embryo, seventeen days. na. Olfactory epithelium. op. v. Optic vesicle. ». fb. Cavity of fore-brain. Fig. 31.—Transverse section through thalamencephalon of larva of eighteen days. pin. Pineal gland. op. ¢h. Optic thalmi. v.f 4. Cavity of fore-brain. na. Olfactory epithelium. Fic. 32.—Transverse section through region of mid-brain of larva of sixteen days. st. Stomodial epithelium. V. g. e. Epiblastic origin of ganglion of fifth nerve. 2. Notochord. m.6. Mid-brain. Figs. 33, 34, and 35.—A series of sections through the anterior end of head of a larva fifty-two days old, to show the ganglia cells at base of olfactory epithelium, w. 7. Upper lip. 7. 7. Lower lip. ¢. Tentacles. gy. z. Ganglion cells at base of nasal invagination. o0.e. Ciliated epithelium lining nasal in- vagination. ec. Cerebral hemispheres. v./. b. Cavity of fore-brain. PLATE XXVIII. Fie. 36.—Branched muscle-fibres of heart of larva forty-nine days old. bl. c. Blood-corpuscles. m.f Muscle-fibre cut across. Fic. 37.—Transverse section through the hind-brain, showing appearance of white matter and ganglion of fifth nerve. 4.4. Hind-brain. s¢. Stomodeum. V. g. Ganglion of fifth nerve. This section is rather oblique. Fie. 38.—Transverse section through hind-brain, showing origin of ganglion of seventh nerve from epiblastic ingrowth. VZJJ. g. Ganglion of seventh nerve. az. Auditory vesicle. f. g. Fore-gut. Fie. 39.—Transverse section through fore-brain of larva forty-nine days old, toshow superior commissure. piz. Pineal gland. v./.6. Cavity of fore- brain. s. cm. Superior commissure. g. 4./. Left ganglion habenule. gy. 4.7. Right ganglion habenule. op. ch. Optic chiasma. pit. Pituitary body. inf. cavity of infundibulum. «7. Upper lip. /.¢. Lower lip. ¢. Tentacles. Zeiss’s C, oc. 1, cam. lue. Fic. 40.—Transverse section through mid-brain of larva of forty-nine days. t. Iter a tertio ad quartum ventriculum. e. Eye. ¢r. Trabecule. vv. r, Ventral ridge. Zeiss’s C, oc. 1, cam. luc. 370 ARTHUR E. SHIPLEY. Fic. 41,—Transverse section through hind-brain of larva of fifty-two days. v. h. 6. Cavity of hind-brain. au. Har. r./. Recessus labyrinthi. VJ. g. Ganglion of seventh nerve. d./. Dorsal lamella. c.g. Ciliated groove. v.7r. Ventral ridge. v. Velum. ao. Aorta. Jdr.v. Branchial vessels. Zeiss’s A, oc. 3, cam. luc. Fic. 42.—Transverse section through region of sixth gill-bar of fifty-two days’ larva. Or®. Sixth gill-bar. sp. g/. Spinal ganglion. ao. Aorta. a. c. Anterior cardinal. ér.v. Branchial vessels. a@o.v. Ventral aorta. J. 9. Ganglion in tenth nerve. d.7. Dorsal lamella. dr. 6. Skeleton of branchial bars. m. 47. Branchial muscles. PLATE XXIX. Fic. 43.—Drawing of larva of fifty-two days. The notch in the liver, behind the heart, is due to the large gall-bladder, through whose walls the cesophagus is seen. This drawing was made by Mr. E. Wilson from the living specimen. THE AMMONIACAL DECOMPOSITION OF URINE. 371 The Ammoniacal Decomposition of Urine. By Wim. Robert Smith, M.D., D.Se., F.R.S.Ed., Examiner in Chemistry and Forensic Medicine, University of Aberdeen. With Plate XXX, figs. 1 and 2. Wuen freshly voided, healthy urine, as is well known, is a clear, transparent, amber-coloured fluid, with a distinct acid reaction, and a peculiar aromatic odour. [If left to itself in an open vessel slight clouds of mucus soon appear which gradually sink to the bottom. After a time the acid reaction is noticed to be slightly increased, and crystals of uric acid and oxalate of lime are deposited. After a longer or shorter interval, de- pendent on the temperature of the surrounding media, this marked acidity begins to diminish and finally disappears, the urine becomes lighter in colour, a whitish scum forms on the surface, and the well-known ammoniacal odour indicates that it has become alkaline ; the uric acid crystals disappear, and whitish granules of urate of ammonia and prismatic crystals of urate of soda take their place, beautiful crystals of phosphate of magnesia and ammonia being subsequently thrown down. The increase of acidity is called by Scherer the acid fermen- tation, and is considered by him to be owing to the presence of the vesical mucus. The alkaline change is spoken of as the alkaline or ammoniacal fermentation, and is owing to the de- composition of the urea into carbonate of ammonia. These so-called fermentative changes are well known, and have long been recognised. So far back as 1682 Van Helmont spoke of the odour of urine as the effect of a putrefactive 372 WILLIAM ROBERT SMITH. ferment, and later on Boerhaave, in a work published in London in 1732, makes direct mention of the presence of ammonia in urine as the result of decomposition. The source of the ammonia was, however, first clearly under- stood in 1799, when Cruickshank, Fourcroy, and Vauquelin discovered urea, the two latter observers showing that carbonate of ammonia was the principal product of its distillation, and they further pointed out the relationship between the conver- sion of urea in solution in water into carbonate of ammonia by heat, and the spontaneous “ fermentative” decomposition of urine. With a more accurate knowledge of the composition of urea the reason of its conversion into carbonate of ammonia became clearer, but the discovery of Proust that freshly voided urine could be kept for years in a well-stoppered flask without undergoing any change first led him to conclude that the action of air, especially of its oxygen, was necessary for its decompo- sition. Later authorities attributed the decomposition to the presence of a ferment, taking its origin in the putrid destruction of the mucus. Our ideas on the subject were, however, thoroughly changed by the work of Pasteur in 1860. He introduced fresh urine into a glass flask, boiled it for a few minutes, and then effectu- ally closed the flask by fusing its neck. He then found that urine thus treated remained fresh for an indefinite period. If, after the lapse of five or six weeks, he introduced into such urine pieces of asbestos which had been freely exposed to the air, decomposition speedily occurred, giving rise to the am- mouiacal smell and the development of numerous organisms, monads, vibriones, bacteria, &c. If, however, the asbestos, previous to its introduction, had been well heated in a blow- pipe flame, no change whatever took place in the urine. It was thus clearly shown that the ammoniacal change in urine was directly owing to the introduction of germs from the air, and subsequently Pasteur and Van Tieghem' showed that in every fermenting ammoniacal urine the presence of micro-organisms 1 Recherches sur la fermentation de l’urée, etc.,’ ‘Comptes rendus,’ T. lviii, p. 210—264, 1864. THE AMMONIACAL DECOMPOSITION OF URINE. 373 could be abundantly demonstrated, and to the presence of these the destruction of the urea was to be traced. The importance of these experiments was at once manifest, not only as giving a clearer explanation of the changes in urine, but also as indicative of the cause in fermentation gene- rally, and in the present day we all recognise the importance of Pasteur’s work as being the foundation of our methods of inquiry into the causes of infectious diseases. Two questions now naturally present themselves for con- sideration : 1. Whether these organisms, which cause the alkaline fer- mentation, always gain admission from without, or whether freshly voided urine contains such germs, so that unboiled urine, carefully protected from contact with the air, may still de- compose; which would admit of the conclusion that the elements of fermentation do not always arise from without ? 2. What particular organism causes the alkaline fermenta- tion, or are several kinds involved ? (1) As regards the entrance of the organism. It has been shown by Cazeneuve! and Livon, and Meissner? that perfectly fresh urine may be preserved free from any fermentative change by eliminating the possibility of the entrance of air and germs, and Professor Leube, by a series of ingenious experiments, has shown that normal urine, on its exit from the bladder, contains neither fungi nor germs, the development of which would cause decomposition of the urea. Further, by the exposure for a few minutes of nutrient gelatine in shallow glass vessels such as those used in plate cultivations, micro-organisms may be culti- vated from the air, which, when isolated, are found to be capable of giving rise to the decomposition of sterilised urine, and which, in form and general characters, are found to be identical with the organisms present in decomposed urine. (2) Is the ammoniacal change in urine due to the presence of one or more organisms? It is with the object particularly of dealing with this question that I have lately carried on an in- 1 ¢Comptes rendus,’ T. Ixxxiv, p. 571, 1877. 2 ¢ Deutsche Zeitschrift fiir Chirurgie,’ Bd. xiii, p. 344, 1880, VOL. XXVI1, PART 3.—NEW SER, DD 374 WILLIAM ROBERT SMITH. vestigation under the direction of Dr. Klein at the Brown Institution. I would, however, in the first place call attention to a valuable paper published last year by Professor W. Leube, to which I am indebted for much information, in which he describes at some length a series of experiments undertaken by Dr. E. Graser and himself with the view of determining the particular organisms which produce the alkaline urinary fermentation. He mentions that, as the result of their experiments, they were able to isolate “ four well-described varieties” which possessed this property, two of them to a very great extent, and the re- maining two only in a feebler sense. The strongest influence he found to be exerted by small bacilli which he designated the Bacterium urex. These bacilli are described as being of a uniform size, ‘001 mm. in thickness, of an average length of ‘002 mm., with rounded ends. The second growth of most frequent occurrence is a micro- coccus of a globular form, and all of equal size, about °8 m. (008 mm.) in diameter. They are occasionally united to form diplococci, or two diplococci may join to form a square. They do not liquefy gelatine. The two remaining organisms which are said to possess a weaker and less constant action are: J, Small and thick bacilli of an oval shape with a varying length of 1:2 m. to 15 m., their greatest width being always ‘7 or ‘8 m. 2. Very minute bacilli with a length of from 1:2 to 1:4 m., and a thickness of °6 m. With the view of further investigating the life-history of the organisms producing this fermentation, I took a quantity of ordinary normal urine which had been recently voided and divided it into two parts; one part I placed aside in a sterilised beaker to allow of decomposition taking place in the ordinary way ; the other part I boiled in a sterilised flask for half an hour. I then filtered it into another sterilised flask, taking the ordinary precautions, and finally decanted it into a number of sterilised test-tubes which were subsequently steamed for THE AMMONIACAL DECOMPOSITION OF URINE. 370 twenty minutes on two successive days in the steam of boiling water ; the tubes were then placed in an incubator, and after an interval of three weeks were still found to be sterile without the slightest trace of ammonia being present. Sterile neutral urine was prepared in the same way. In starting the cultivation of the organisms I adopted the plan described by Dr. Klein at a recent meeting of the Chemical Society. The fine end of a freshly made capillary pipette was placed in the ammoniacal urine, and a little allowed to ascend in the tube by capillarity ; a number of tubes containing nutrient gelatine were then inoculated by passing the pipette through the cotton-wool plug and allowing a drop- let of the urine to pass out; the tubes were then placed in water having a temperature of about 40° for the purpose of melting the gelatine; they were then gently shaken so that the droplet which had been introduced should be uniformly distributed, the gelatine being subsequently poured out, with the usual precautions, into the lower of the two dishes used in plate cultivations and allowed to reset. After this had oc- curred, the glasses were placed on a glass plate, covered with a Bell jar containing a piece of moist blotting paper and main- tained at a temperature of 20° C. in an incubator. By these means after the introduction of the smallest droplet a large number of organisms was obtained, and by the subse- quent processes of ‘ fractional cultivation’ and “ dilution ” these were isolated, and the tubes containing the acid and neutral sterile urine inoculated with them with the view of determining the particular organisms producing the ammo- niacal change. By these methods I was able to isolate about twenty dif- ferent organisms, both bacilli and micrococci, but after re- peated experiments I only found one organism—a micrococcus —able to decompose the urea into carbonate of ammonia. It would be tedious and serve no useful purpose to describe each of these organisms, and so I shall confine my remarks to a description of that one which induces the desired change. If a plate cultivation be made of this micrococcus, and kept 376 WILLIAM ROBERT SMITH. at a temperature of 20° C., in twenty-four hours a number of small points are visible which by an ordinary magnifying glass are seen to have a faint outline, and to be scattered uniformly over the surface ; in two days they are very distinct and are seen as circular whitish spots of the size of a fine point. These spots do not increase much in size, and in a few days liquefaction of the gelatine commences. In tube cultivations, in which the solid gelatine is inocu- lated by means of a platinum wire inserted for some distance in the depth, the tubes being subsequently placed in an incu- bator at 20° C., in twenty-four hours the channel of inocu- lation is visible as a pale whitish streak made up of closely placed minute dots; these in a few days so enlarge that an appearance is presented of more or less parallel lines of small dots, at the same time that the growth spreads over the surface as a whitish film. In about three or four days the first trace of liquefaction is seen with slight depression of the surface ; this liquefaction gradually extends downwards from the sur- face, the liquefied part being thick and uniformly turbid. The accompanying drawings (Pl. XXX, figs. ] and 2) show these characteristics, and fig. 2 the amount of liquefaction which had taken place in eighteen days, the tube having been inoculated on the 12th July, and the sketch made on the 30th July. Microscopically, the micrococci are seen to be mostly single, or diplococci; there are, however, a few short chains and a few small groups of four, five, to eight. With this organism I inoculated both acid and neutral sterile urine, and in twenty-four to thirty-six hours the ammoniacal change took place. I also inoculated the fluid recommended by von Taksch, consisting of one litre of water, one eighth gramme of acid phosphate of potash, one sixteenth gramme of sulphate of magnesia, and three grammes of urea with a like result. Therefore, so far as my observations go, the ammoniacal decomposition of urine is brought about by the presence of a micrococcus which differs from that described by Professor W. Leube, inasmuch as it liquefies gelatine. Whether this organism THE AMMONIACAL DECOMPOSITION OF URINE. 377 is identical with the organism known since Pasteur and Cohn (‘ Zeitsch. f. Biol.,’? A. Pfl. ii) as the Micrococcus uree I cannot say, because the characters of this latter had—at the time when Pasteur and Cohn investigated them—not been so studied by plate cultivation, &c., as they now are. I have not been able to detect any other organism having a like effect, although it is possible that there are such pos- sessing this quality in an inferior degree. DESCRIPTION OF PLATE XXX, figs. 1 and 2, I}lustrating Dr. Wm. Robert Smith’s Paper on “ The Ammo- niacal Decomposition of Urine.” Fie. 1.—Showing dotted appearance of the organism in the depth of gela- tine, with surface film, and commencing liquefaction at surface. Fic. 2.—Showing the amount of liquefaction which had taken place in eighteen days from the date of inoculation of a gelatine tube with the Micrococcus uree. ai ne Siti: vs ung Li ; hater he * pit Pe ae sy ay Seu NE oi es Teer ee aie ae Beuhi dl Riedie AOMSPeR Ps or ole ea OR Nioiinped thee wea sleien sce i henge ae . jh ew ON tomer fa bw cae Ho a go ian y “FR nine = = i ) ae " ‘ é y . ~— 4 | & <3 [ wad y f J 94 i oe ‘ ee Pv ahee i fi : ' My ie ey al ean alayy i F 1 P4i( iA w Dentin Ola jie H af, ‘ : % " a | > 7 ic er) le tL Mw : Ly Lite (mhatkaem al Teale sida ia STereics | A a” + ? iw amr 4 AWS oN A. a Fi i) ste anliwe E. ; +s oui ive Warps 1) tun Bs ® » = , a” 2 4 Wh ia ww, alana Mii wali UngTatry ' a. ait " tid 1 ae Lilie oe 90h von mye ith ig pat hii edt «Panhine . ¢ i | gate ji AS “ Leo iO NVT ts AL 7 / ¢ oi 1 a) “ ’ a ; rn : va i . 7. i - : ae 7 | _ =, 5 , 5th » 7 Ll c-9 aay SS 7 . } higg D* es i - ‘ Ph => - ; ‘ - THE FUNCTION OF NETTLEOCELLS. 393 The Function of Nettlecells. By R. von Lendenfeld, Ph.D., F.L.S., Assistant in the Zoological Laboratory of University College, London. With Plate XXX, fig. 4. MorPHo.oey. Both in the ectoderm and the entoderm of all Polypomedusze these elements are met with. They are never absent in the ectoderm in any species, and are generally also found in the entoderm. Their structure has been investigated by numerous authors ; particularly F, E. Schulze (1), O. Hamann (2), Korotneff (3), and the author (4) have studied their structure and action more closely. Also Jickeli (5) has dwelt on this subject. However different the animals may be on which these Nettle- cells are found, the latter nevertheless are always of the same structure, although they may vary very much in size. The large ones are fewer in number and more determinate in their position than the small ones. No Nettlecells of the large kind are found in the entoderm. The Nettlecells, or, as Schulze calls them, cnidoblasts, consist of a cell the greater portion of which is occupied by the well- known highly refracting vesicle, on the size of which the size of the whole cnidoblast depends. The granular proto- plasmatic portion of the Nettlecell is reduced in bulk so much that it only forms a thin coating over the surface of the vesicle. In one locality this plasmatic coat is slightly thickened, and here the flattened nucleus, closely attached to the vesicle, is situated. 394 R. VON LENDENFELD. From the upper margin of this protoplasmatic sac which surrounds the vesicle, a conical, stout and pointed filament, the cnidocil, projects. This is about as long as the vesicle is broad, and is situated in such manner oblique to the surface as to form with it an angle of 45°. This angle is very constant. The cnidocil always points in a centrifugal direction, that is to say the cnidocils on the tentacles point towards the ends of the tentacles, those on the body point towards the mouth, and so on. The cnidocils invariably point in that direction from which a foreign body is most likely to approach the animal. The vesicle itself possesses a very distinct, tough, and appa- rently elastic membrane. It is closed on all sides except the anterior end, where a circular aperture, about a quarter as wide as the vesicle, is situated. This aperture leads into a very long tube, when the ecnidoblast has exploded. This tube is about twenty times as long as the cnidoblast and tapers towards the end, which appears pointed. It is surrounded by one or two spiral lines of minute hooks or bristles which are often very large and conspicuous at the base, but which rapidly decrease in size distally and become invisible even with the highest power near the end. The tube is probably closed at the end. This tube can be ejected with great force from the capsule of the cnidoblast, where it is coiled up very regularly before the explosion. The explosion inverts this tube hanging down from the orifice of the capsule into its interior, so that the external surface of the coiled-up tube becomes the internal surface of the ejected tube and vice versa. The well-known poisonous effect of these cnidoblasts is due to a poison which is contained in the interior of the coiled-up tube, and which, as the tube is inverted, comes to be situated on the outer surface. The tube penetrates, by the force of its ejection and in conse- quence of its small size, soft foreign bodies which may come in contact with the animal, and so the poison is transmitted into the body of the victim. Whilst Mébius and others have studied the tube and capsule, the discovery of the cnidocil was made by F. E. Schulze. After these facts had been made known, the question arose THE FUNOTION OF NETTLECELLS. 395 whether the cnidoblast was in connection with the nervous system described particularly by the brothers Hertwig. Such a connection has been demonstrated in many cases by Jickeli, the author, and Korotneff. In the lower strata—subepithelium—of the dermis, ganglion cells are met with in those parts generally where cnidoblasts are situated. These ganglia cells are multipolar. Their processes are connected with slender nerve-fibres extending tangentially between the mesodermal jelly (the supporting membrane, Stiitzlamelle) and the outer epithelium. Some of these pro- cesses, however, extend in a radial, centrifugal direction, and these are connected with the large cnidoblasts. No con- nection has hitherto been observed with sufficient certainty between the ganglion cells and the small enidoblasts. The protoplasmatic outer portion of the cnidoblast is pro- longed into a process extending centripetally like a peduncle. This is composed of granular protoplasm and forms the connection between the cnidoblast and the ganglion cell below. Hamann found that these peduncles, in some cases at least, were not formed of granular protoplasm, but appeared as transparent and structureless peduncles formed of the same substance as the supporting mesodermal membrane. Subsequently I was able to demonstrate that the large cnidoblasts have two pedun- cles, one a transparent supporting rod as described by Hamann, and one a granular thread, which connects it with the ganglia cells of the subepithelium. Whilst the former is always quite straight, the latter generally appears more or less curved and irregular. These cnidoblasts are surrounded by high and slender cylins drical ciliated cells which form the outermost layer, or they penetrate the large cells of the outer epithelium. In those parts where the epithelium is formed by flat and low pavement cells, large cnidoblasts are never observed. The small cnidoblasts, however, are scattered over the surface more indiscriminately and occur in great abundance also in the pavement cell areas. In these areas a subepithelial layer of ganglion cells seems not to occur. 396 R. VON LENDENFELD. PuHysIoLocy. F. E. Schulze, who discovered the cnidocil, was of opinion that any foreign body touching the cnidocil would cause an explosion of the Nettlecell, much in the same way as touch invariably causes a sting in the case of the stinging-nettle. To this end it appeared that the cnidocil was so placed as to point towards the ends of tentacles, that is, always in that direction whence an enemy would be most likely to approach. The position of the stinging hairs of Urtica is the same. Others who dwelt on the subject endorsed Schulze’s purely mechanical explanation, that direct pressure on the enidocil is transmitted to the cnidoblast and there causes the explosion of the capsule which is already in high tension. If this were so there would apparently be no reason for the connection of the cnidoblast with the nervous system of the animal. Now, it is a well-known fact that touch by no means invariably causes the explosion of the Nettlecells and the ejection of the tube. Ifa tentacle of an Actinia is viewed under the micro- scope in seawater under a cover-glass, and if fine grains of sand are placed in the water and a strong current produced by suction on one end, then the sand-grains are carried to and fro with great velocity by the moving water and continually come in contact with the surface of the tentacle. No explosion of a Nettlecell, however, can be observed. But if acetic acid be added to the water then the tubes will be seen shooting forth like rockets all over the surface. When the animals, as they often do, contract themselves and draw up their tentacles like the Medusze to one hundredth part of their length, or close them over the mouth like the Actiniz, there must be a very strong pressure, which according to the mechanical theory would immediately explode all the Nettle- cells. There are some species of Actinia which live in sand, as, for instance, the Cerianthus, Those which live in shallow water, THE FUNCTION OF NETTLECELLS. 397 or between tide-marks, bury the body in the sand and expand their tentacles in the surface of the sand, the waves move the sand and it is evident that masses of sand must be continually falling on the tentacles. I have often observed a species of Actinia exceedingly abundant in the “ sands” of Port Phillip, Victoria, and I know that they do not retract their tentacles when the water moves and the sand drops on them. According to the mechanical theory, each sand-grain which came into contact with the tentacles would cause the explosion of a great number of Nettlecells. It is evident that this cannot be so. Further, there are Nettlecells embedded in the jelly of the umbrella of some Medusz (discovered by me, l. c., over the marginal bodies of Crambessa mosaica) which explode if the surface of the body is touched with acetic acid instan- taneously and long before the acid could have got to where they are situated. This will show that touch is by no means sufficient to cause the explosion of the Nettlecells; nor is it the only possible cause. It would now seem possible that the cnidoblasts were exploded at the will of the animal by a contraction caused consequent on a centrifugally acting nervous irritation in the plasmatic mantle surrounding the capsule. Chun (6) has observed muscular differentiations in this plasmatic mantle in Physalia, which is one of the severest stinging Ccelenterates. Others have been inclined to consider the peduncle as muscular and contractile. If we were to assume this we should not be able to see the use of the cnidocil. It seems, therefore, that there can be but one explanation of the mode of action of the cnidoblasts—of the large kind, at least —which is the following : 1. The structureless peduncle is a support and may contract so as to withdraw the cnidoblast with its lid from the surface under certain circumstances, particularly when the parts where the Nettlecell is situated are to be contracted. The animal has 898 R. VON LENDENTELD. control over these movements by means of the subepithelial nervous layer situated below the cnidoblasts. 2. The granular peduncle is a nerve-fibre connecting the protoplasinatic mantle of the Nettlecell with the nervous system of the animal. 3. By means of this the movements of the protoplasmatic mantle can be controlled. 4. The explosion of the enidoblast is caused by the contraction of the plasmatic coat which surrounds the capsule, and which in Physalia (Chun, |. c.) has partly been converted into a network of muscular fibres. 5. The plasmatic contractile coat of the cnidoblast is incited to action by the cnidocil. Ifanything touches the enidocil then the plasma mantle contracts and the tube is shot forth. 6. The animal can, however, by its volition prevent this reflex action by means of the nerve-fibre connecting the cnido- blast with the ganglia cells below. In this way the explosion may be prevented even if the cnidocil be touched, if this be the wish of the animal. We find, accordingly, that the complicated machinery of nerve-centres controlling reflex actions of a low order in man and the higher animals is found also in these low forms of animal life, the Colentera. The Ctenophora, which are destitute of cnidoblasts, possess in their stead certain structures, the “ Klebezellen”’ of Chun and the “ Stiftzellen ”! of Hertwig, which appear homologous with these Nettlecells in the Ctenophora. Their action is very different and they do not explode like the cnidoblasts of Polypomeduse. It seems, however, probable that they are in a similar way subject to the control of the animal, as is the cnidoblast. ' These are, according to my investigations of the histology of Nais cor- digera, Les., (7), not a sensitive apparatus, as the brothers Hertwig had assumed, but stinging hairs. THE FUNOTION OF NETTLECELLS. 399 PAPERS REFERRED TO. 1. F. E. Scuurze.—“ Ueber Syncoryne Sarsii, Lovén, und die zuge- horige Meduse Sarsia tubulosa.” 2. O. Hamany.—“ Der Organismus der Hydroidpolypen.” ‘Jenaische Zeitschrift fiir Naturwissenschaft,’ 1881, Band 15. ‘‘ Ueber Nessel- kapselzellen,” |. c. 3. Korotnerr.—* Ueber Siphonophoren.” Mittheilungen aus der zoolo- gischen Station in Neapel, 1884. 4, R. v. Lenpsnretp.— Ueber Coelenteraten der Siidsee. iii., Ueber Webrthiere und Nesselzellen,”’ ‘ Zeitschrift fiir wissenschaftliche Zoo- logie,’ 1883, Band 388, p. 366. 5. C. Jickeu1.—“ Ueber den Bau der Hydroidpolypen,” ‘ Morphologisches Jahrbuch,’ 1882. 6. C. Cuun.—* Die Natur und Wirkungsweise der Nesselzellen bei Coe- lenteraten,” ‘ Zoologischer Anzeiger,’ Band 4, p. 646. 7. R. v. Lenpenretp.— Nais cordigera, Les.,” ‘ Zeitschrift fiir wis- senschaftliche Zoologie,’ Band 41, p, 673. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXX, fig. 4, Illustrating R. von Lendenfeld’s Paper on “‘ The Functions of Nettlecells.” Fic. 4.—Schematic representation of cnidoblast, &e.—a. Mesodermal sup- porting lamella. 6. Peduncle (Hamann’s) of cnidoblast. ¢. Ordinary cylin- drical epithelium cells. d@. Their nuclei. ¢. Longitudinal striated muscles. J: Subepithelial muscle-cells. gy. Their nuclei. /. Subepithelial ganglion cell. i. Tangential nerve-fibre. 4. Nucleus of the ganglion cell. 7. Epithelial sen- sitive cell. m. Its nucleus. x. Palpocil (Wright). 0. Cilia of the ordinary epithelium cells. y. Nerve connecting ganglion cell with cnidoblast. g. Pro- toplasmatic contractile mantle of cnidoblast. 7. Nucleus of enidoblast. s. Nematocyst. ¢. Its aperture. w. Cnidocil (Schulze), v, Thread coiled up inside the cnidoblast, i: _ 7 7 | = | i » “Sov e « sallaclanlonbcasth' sag iis YL hah, BU. AV Sale ‘ee - ee | sip aie fui ere Lo ae “wis be SA ¢ Ta 7 Mery) Pf? Aer: | ‘ . y ah 2 RTM hil a LL 5 nit fy os. ra . J will “ “i ( 7% i 4 } “ o oo eta 7 d vf . = ’ éf . " - ? . 4 if rt a z : : _ f ° : : ij a tA 7 ; ZOOSPORES IN THE SAPROLEGNIEA. 427 On the Formation and Liberation of the Zoospores in the Saprolegniez. By Marcus M. Hartog, D.Sc., M.A., F.R.U.E. I. Tue ForMATION OF THE ZoosPoreEs. THE zoosporange of the Saprolegniee has long been a favourite object for the study of cell development; but only within the last few years has an insight been obtained into the great complexity of the phenomena attending the formation and the liberation of the zoospores. These were first described by Biisgen (“‘ Die Entwicklung der Phycomyceten-sporangien ” in ‘ Pringsheim’s Jahrbiicher,’ vol. xiii, 1882);' and, a little later, independently by Marshall Ward (‘Observations on Saprolegniez ” in ‘ Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science,’ N.S., vol. xxiii, 1883). The following is an abstract of the nearly concurrent results obtained by these two observers. As is well known, the zoosporange is formed by the enlargement of the end of a hypha. The protoplasm streams into this enlargement and becomes dense, its transverse septum then isolates the zoo- sporange, which contains one large centre vacuole, or, in Achlya, often several small ones. A blunt beak-like enlarge- ment forms at an undetermined place (usually the apex), and through this the spores are finally emitted. In Achlya the following processes occur. There appears in 1 This paper contains an excellent summary of the literature of the subject. 428 MARCUS M. HARTOG. the protoplasm a network of lines, formed of fine granules, and marking out the protoplasm into polygonal areas. These lines broaden out, and become converted into clear bands, which slowly swell up “like transitory cell plates.” This we may term the first stage of preliminary division. The second or homogeneous stage consists essentially in the almost instantaneous disappearance of the clear bands ; the protoplasm becomes lighter and homogeneous; the central vacuole or vacuoles disappear at the same time that the basal septum, hitherto concave towards the sporange, now bulges in and becomes convex, showing that the turgescence of the sporange has diminished. This stage hardly lasts more than half a minute, and passes on to the Third stage, that of the shifting vacuoles. The proto- plasm loses its homogeneity owing to the appearance of a number of minute vacuoles, some of which would seem to occupy the centre of the meshes bounded by the network of the first stage, others to lie along the lines bounding them. These vacuoles come and go, fuse or disappear, and reappear. This stage gradually passes into the next. Fourth stage of finaldivision. Now, as the protoplasm shrinks from the wall, leaving a clear space interpreted by Biisgen and De Bary as a substance, new lines appear, clearly marked and more numerous than in the preliminary division. They are the optical expression of the planes separating the zoospores, which now contract, round off, and escape a little later. These are the facts as described by Biisgen and Ward, and as accepted by De Bary, their master, in his great work on Fungi. In the above summary I have alluded to the fact that Biisgen regards the lines of the preliminary division as rudi- mentary cell plates. Ward explains them as nuclear plates. Biisgen and De Bary seem to consider them to be the ultimate source of the expulsive substance lining the sporangial wall in the last stage, which, swelling in water, would determine the expulsion of the zoospores: they deny the existence of the flagella on the sporangial zoospore of Achlya as described by ZOOSPORES IN THE SAPROLEGNIEA. 429 Cornu in his classical memoir, so that, for this genus, the exis- tence of an expulsive matter would be essential to liberate the zoospores. In Dictyuchus (genus), Saprolegnia, and Leptomitus the processes and stages differ only in minor details from the above. In July, 1884, I had the opportunity of going over this matter in Strasburg, under the direction of the same illustrious botanist, Prof. A. De Bary, and with the kind help of Dr. Biisgen. I had in hand a species of Saprolegnia which we were unable to determine, as during the intense heat it formed no sexual fruit. I anticipated nothing more than the confir- mation of my predecessors’ results, but to my surprise I found an undescribed phenomenon at the homogeneous stage. As soon as it came on, a crowd of bacteria swarmed from all parts to the neighbourhood of the sporange, and executed a vigorous dance there till the conclusion of the stage, when they dispersed. Inferring that some excretion must take place thus to attract the bacteria, I put in the eye-piece micrometer, and found indeed that the sporange narrowed greatly, by as much as one seventh of its previous calibre. This unexpected result set me thinking, and on my return to Cork I took up the study afresh. Here I have only obtained two species: Achlya polyandra, and a form with the constricted hyphz of a Leptomitus, but which seemed to be identical with Saprolegnia Thuretii,! sent to me recently by Prof. De Bary’s kindness. Though these forms were convenient for study and easily cultivated, they just failed to show the marked contraction so interesting in the undetermined Saprolegnia. I now proceed to describe the chief new points I have made out. In the Leptomitus form, and in starved sporanges of Achlya, where a narrow layer of parietal protoplasm sur- rounds an immense vacuole, it is easy to study the real signi- ‘ T now think [ must have contaminated my culture of S. Thuretii with my Leptomitus form, which I hence regard as distinct, and define thus: Saprolegnia corcagiensis (n. sp.), diplanetica, habitu, constrictionibus, zoosporangiis que omnino Leptomiti lactei, polygama, oogoniis fenestratis. 430 MARCUS M. HARTOG. ficance of the lines of preliminary division. They are the optical expression of thinnings of this parietal layer between prominences rounded towards the vacuole. These prominences enlarge, and the protoplasm aggregates more and more in them as they become nearly hemispherical ; and the intermediate protoplasm becomes thinner and thinner, so as to give the impression of clear spaces in surface view; but in optical section it is easy to assure oneself that the proto- plasm lining the sporange wall is everywhere continuous and closely applied thereto. Careful focussing everywhere shows the continuity of the clear bands and the vacuole. The granules which first marked out the lines of demarcation in Achlya do not disappear; they form a layer at the edge and over the free surface of each hemispherical prominence, and are seen as lines bounding it in plan and in optical section. When the sporange of Achlya is normal the central vacuole is replaced by several, owing to the abundance of protoplasm ; and these in the first stage become converted into a continuous system of lacune. The inner masses of protoplasm are all connected by thinner bands. In the narrower sporanges of Leptomitus there is no room for a double row of prominences; hence in section they pro- ject alternately, and the central vacuole becomes zigzag. Here it is easy to see that the lines or bands of the preliminary division are merely thinnings of the protoplasm. In the undetermined Saprolegnia the central vacuole per- sists, communicating, I think, with a lacunar system of spaces in the thick parietal layer of protoplasm, which includes several layers of prominences (or rather aggregations of protoplasm). The homogeneous stage consists essentially in the swelling up of the protoplasm and the loss of its resistance to osmosis. On examining a normal sporange of Achlya, and carefully focussing a lacuna with a high power (Zeiss E 4” for instance), we see at the onset of this stage that the margins of the lacuna advance and meet from the angles inwards until the space disappears completely, much in the same way as the con- 1 As indeed figured by Biisgen (op. cit., T. xii, figs. 11, 12). ZOOSPORES IN THE SAPROLEGNIEA. 431 tractile vacuole of an Amceba is seen to disappear. Inastarved sporange the protoplasm contracts into a bossed gut-like mass towards the centre of the sporange; for the cell wall is rather thickened and rigid, so that it cannot present the contraction so marked in the undetermined Saprolegnia and ina less degree in the Leptomitus form (which, however, is usually too narrow for easy measurements). I have tried to account for the causes of this curious phenomenon, of which I have just given the first complete description. It occurred to me that the following was a possible explanation. The protoplasm is acted upon in two ways: 1. The tendency of protoplasm to stick together into a single mass. 2. The tendency to aggregate around numerous centres (to form the prominences), aided by the turgescence of the sporange. If then the thinning at the intermediate bands went on to complete rupture at any one point, the turgescence would be lost; so the first force would overcome the second, now left unaided by the turgor lost for the moment, and would thus lead to homogeneity ; though the second force ultimately gain the upper hand in the next and last stage. In this case loss of turgescence should always bring on homogeneity. I tried to induce loss of turgescence by De Vries’s method of plasnolysis with solutions of cane sugar and of saltpetre. I found, however, that plasno- lysis to a very considerable extent was not sufficient to induce homogeneity. Hence the loss of turgescence must be a concomitant or follower of homogeneity, and not its cause. The explanation had seemed so simple that I was much disappointed at having to give it up; but the facts were too strong. I then experimented with the aqueous solution of eosin, which De Vries has shown does not diffuse readily through the **Hautschicht” or external layer of protoplasm, nor its internal layer, the “ vacuolar wall.” The protoplasm only stains readily at the stage of homogeneity ; whence we may conclude that at this stage the resistant layers do not exist, at least as continuous layers. I think it probable that the Hautschicht and vacuolar walls break up at this stage, and become re- 432 MARCUS M. HARTOG. constituted later on, and that herein is the true essence of the homogeneous stage.1 Probably, also, the stage of shifting vacuoles is due to the reconstitution of these resistant layers. As to the nuclei which exist in the first stage (of preliminary division),? Biisgen adduces facts which make it probable that nuclear multiplication takes place during the homogeneous stage. The observation of the nuclei is extremely difficult, and I am still seeking a satisfactory technique for the pursuit and elucidation of this division of the subject. Il. Tue Liseration or THE ZoosPores. As already stated, the emission of the zoospores has been ascribed by previous observers to the secretion of an expulsive matter in the sporange, which swells up in the water to expel them. Now, if such a substance existed it should be visible by some difference of refrangibility or staining in the spo- range or outside. But there is no matter lining the sporangial wall that will stain in any reagent, or refract differently to the water of the preparation. I have tried aniline dyes, he- matoxylin, picrocarmine, before and after fixation by osmic acid, picric acid, absolute alcohol, and obtained no sign of its existence. There is no streakiness in the water (even on staining) at the emptying of the sporange. In this case we may fairly say, “ De non apparentibus et de non exsistentibus eadem est ratio.” But if we follow the process of expulsion fully and minutely, we shall be led to another explanation, admissible as involving a vera causa: acceptable, as cover- ing all the facts. To understand it we must review in detail the processes of the definitive separation and emission of the zoospores. The protoplasm which hitherto filled the beak usually forms 1 I must here note that in Leptomitus the first lines of demarcation never wholly disappear ; the homogeneity is never absolute. ? Whence Marshall Ward’s identification of the lines as nuclear plates is inadmissible. His words are rather ambiguous, “ A phenomenon of nuclear division in which the cell plate first formed becomes used up again” (I. c., p. 286). ZOOSPORES OF THE SAPROLEGNIE®. 433 at least two zoospores, which, as they round off, become too large for the calibre of the beak and retire from it. The end wall ofthe beak, convex outwardly, is now seen in optic section to be menisciform, thickened in the middle and thinning off at the edges; and it presents that peculiar brilliant lustre which is so characteristic of diffluent or collenchymatised cell walls. And, indeed, it does shortly disappear, a phenomenon which De Bary ascribes with great plausibility to the secretion of some ferment. In some cases, especially in the undetermined Saprolegnia, we may actually perceive the disappearance, followed by the immediate outrush of the zoospores; but usually in Achlya and Leptomitus the foremost zoospore enters the beak, and closes up against its end wall, which, pos- sessing the same refractive index, ceases to be distinguishable. In this case the outrush ef the zoospores is the sole indication of the dissolution of the end wall of the beak. As soon as the way is clear, the zoospores crowd to the opening, closely serried, leaving a clear space along the side wall of the sporange, and giving at first sight the impression that they are indeed pushed by such a vis a latere as the expulsive matter of De Bary wouldexert. They force their way through the opening, often becoming constricted as they do so, and emerge obtusely pyri- form or of a stumpy “ biscuit shape,” with the anterior end the narrower, and possessing two flagella (tractella). The hinder ones in the sporange, as room is made for them, also lose their rounded or polygonal form, and assume this. In Achlya, as the zoospores emerge, they remain near the entrance, grouped in a hollow sphere, their narrower rounded ends turned in towards the centre. Hach new comer presses in between the others, so that the sphere grows in size till the zoospores have all settled there. The outrush of the spores, so rapid at first, is seen to slacken after some time, and then we can note more readily the real mode of procedure. A man up in a balloon, observing a crowd at the doors of a theatre, might well regard the inrush of sight- seers when the doors open as the expression of a vis a4 tergo; but he can correct his judgment by observing the behaviour of 434 MARCUS M. HARTOG. the isolated later arrivals. We may often see in the half- emptied sporange a file of say eight or ten equidistant zoospores going towards the opening ; the hinder ones move leisurely enough, keeping their distance; the front ones quicken up their motion and lengthen their distance as they get to the mouth, and leave it with a run, like a late arrival when he is stimulated by coming in sight of the theatre. At length, when there are but two or three left in the sporange, they may be seen to move to and fro leisurely, as if careless of any goal, till when they happen as it were to get towards the apex ; then they too quicken speed and go out, but less fast than in the earlier stages of emission, and so finally leave the sporange empty. Only when the water is not well aerated a number of zoospores may remain inside. We now turn to those that have left the sporange in Achlya, grouped in a sphere outside. Each revolves on its long axis for a short time, then goes to rest, rounds off and becomes encysted in a cellulose wall, closely united with its neighbours. Sometimes, however, a few zoospores of Achlya may escape from the sphere and swim off a short distance to turn on themselves for a short time (sometimes becoming amceboid), round off, and encyst quite isolated. As these motions clearly indicated a motor organ, I used the usual reagent for cilia and flagella, iodine solution, which at once demonstrated the flagella in the moving zoospores, inside or outside the spo- range, as seen by Cornu and denied by Busgen and De Bary.1 1 Cornu’s words are most explicit. “ Le trait d’union entre les Sapro- legnia et les Achlyaa cependant échappé jusqu’ici a tous les botanistes. “Les zoospores sont de deux sortes, comme chez les Saprolegnia [italicised in the original]. Les premiéres, au lieu de se mouvoir pendant plusieurs minutes ont juste assez d’agilite pour gagner Vouverture du sporange ; elles sont munies de deux cils antérieures, visibles dans les condi- tions favorables. Elles adhérent les unes aux autres en général par le moyen de ces cils. . . . Au bout de ce temps [three or four hours] elles présen- tent, soit le premier mode de germination, qui consiste a s’allonger en filaments, soit le deuxiéme, et émettent alors des zoospores de deuxiéme nature” (‘Monographie des Saprolegniées,’ p. 11). In the face of this clear and detailed statement by so trustworthy an inves- ZOOSPORES IN THE SAPROLEGNIEA. 435 In Leptomitus and Saprolegnia the flagella are easily seen even in the sporange. In these forms the zoospores, instead of assembling in a hollow sphere at the mouth of the sporange, swim away freely in all directions for a few minutes, and then encyst after the fashion described for Achlya. In all these genera the cyst opens after a few hours and the zoospore leaves in a different form, kidney shaped, with two flagella diverging from the notch, one anterior (tractellum) and one posterior (pulsellum). This phenomenon of two distinct mobile conditions to the zoospore separated by an interval of rest, has received the name of Diplanetism. It is obvious that Achlya is also diplanetic. We have now to consider the full explanation of the outrush, which study has already led us to regard as really due to a vis a fronte, an attraction outside the sporange. No expulsive matter could produce the exit of the last few zoo- spores nor effect the acceleration of their movement near their mouth. Now, Engelmann and Pfeffer have by their brilliant researches familiarised us with the action of chemical stimuli. The swarming of the bacteria at one stage, evidently due to such a stimulus, led me to undertake this research, and I must invoke the theory again at this point. Saprolegniez ~ are among the most aerobic of plants; their culture only suc- ceeds when the water in which they grow is kept constantly oxygenated. When the oxygen is used up, the hyphe and young sporanges become deformed; the mature sporanges open by the disappearance of the end wall of the beak; but the zoospores remain inside; they encyst there and form the so-called “ Dictyuchus state,” which never occurs in well aerated cultures of the above three genera. It is obvious then that oxygen dissolved in the ambiant water exercises the stimulus which is the true source of the liberation of the zoospores. That such a stimulus is sufficient to account for the squeezing out is obvious from the observation tigator, it is astonishing that such excellent observers should have denied the existence of the flagella, without exhausting every means of ascertaining if they were there. 436 MARCUS M. HARTOG. of Juranyi, cited elsewhere by Marshall Ward, that in Gidogo- nium the “ relatively large antherozooid forces its way through an aperture too small for it to reach the attracting oosphere.” The exit is so rapid at first because of the contrast between the external medium and the small amount of liquid within the sporange, vitiated by the close-packed thousands ofzoospores, and with its gases slowly changed through the sporangial wall, and because of the immense number of zoospores, all influenced at once by the stimulus. Later on the contrast is lessened, partly by the exit of so many zoospores, partly by the influx of aerated water from without to occupy the room left by their exit. Only near the very mouth of the sporange is the contrast marked enough to accelerate the pace of the foremost zoospores. But when the water is left unaerated there is no difference as regards oxygenation between the inside of the sporange and the surroundings; the beak may open, but the zoospores, feeling no attraction to without, stay where they are, and the Dictyuchus state is produced; or, if the aeration be imperfect, only some of the zoospores leave the sporange till those within are no longer attracted and remain inside. Finally, we may note that this is only one instance of the extraordinary susceptibility of this group to chemical stimuli. Others are well known, such as the growth of the hyphe of germinating zoospores (especially in the Dictyuchus condi- tion) towards food material, the germination of the oospores only in presence of food material, the growth of the antheridial branches towards the oogonium, &c: The following is an abstract of the chief points I claim to have established : 1. The clear bands of the first stage of the zoosporange are neither cell plates nor nuclear plates, but thinner parts of the protoplasm due to the aggregation of the greater part thereof around distinct centres. 2. At the homogeneous stage the protoplasm acquires an extreme perviousness to liquid; this is probably due to the temporary loss of the resistant layers (Hautschicht, vacuolar walls) as continuous layers. ZOOSPORES IN THE SAPROLEGNIEZ. 437 3. The homogeneous stage is accompanied by a loss of turgescence, and in many cases by a marked contraction of the sporange. 4, The clear spaces seen in the final separation are merely the watery liquid of the sporange between the contracting z0o- spores, and do not represent expulsive matter. Nosuch expul- sive matter exists. 5. The sporangial zoospores of Achlya possess at their exit the two tractella described by Cornu, just like those of Saprolegnia and Leptomitus. Achlya is therefore dipla- netic. 6. The escape of the zoospores is not due to any such expul- sive matter as has been assumed, but to the chemical stimulus of the oxygen in the medium acting on the auto-motile zoo- spores. It would seem probable that the escape of the protoplasm from gonidia of so many Peronosporez (Phytophthora and the plasmatoparous Peronospore, for instance) is due to the same chemical stimulus of well-aerated water. There is no evidence for the existence of an expulsive matter in the sporange or spore of any aquatic fungus. Sporangial walls being diffusible to water and gases it is obvious that the conditions of the constantly immersed sporange are totally different from those of the aerial ascus of the higher fungi, where such a material does certainly exist. The above observations were chiefly made on plants grown on mealworms in tumblers, and floated out on large glass slides for observation, seldom covered, and replaced in the tumblers after- wards. In some cases I have used small cultures in the hanging drop with the cardboard or blotting-paper moist chamber. P.S.—A suggestion as to the physiological value and the filiation of diplanetism, &c., may not be out of place. The zoospore on leaving the sporange has enough reserve material to carry it a certain distance, and to enable it to germinate. In the first swarming the zoospores get scattered; and then during the long stage of encystment the further work of dis- VOL, XXVII, PART 3,——-NEW SER. HH 438 MARCUS M. HARTOG. semination is effected by the movements of the water at no cost to the organism. And we must bear in mind that a con- siderable amount of dissemination is needed, lest the zoospores should be uselessly attracted to the host on which their parent thallus is living. . In Achlya the limited first swarming forms a sort of zlobular colony of resting spores, easily broken away as a whole by a slight impact, as of a dead animal floating down stream. The swarmers when liberated form a host of invaders effecting rapid and complete infection, which isolated ones might fail to do. In Dictyuchus (gen.) the resting state of Achlya is reached without the expenditure of energy required to swim to the outlet of the sporange. A further economy is thus effected. The Termination of Nerves in the Liver. By A. B. Macallum, B.A., Fellow of University College, Toronto, Canada. With Plate XXXIII, figs, 1 to 6. oe Artrr the completion of my studies on the termination of nerves in the cutaneous epithelium of the tadpole, I began investigations on the distribution and arrangement of nerves in other organs, and have now arrived at what I consider important results, more especially in the case of liver. That of man was first employed at the outset of the investigation, but I soon perceived that on account of the small size of the cells here I would have to resort to some other Vertebrate for control pur- poses ; not that the liver of man does not yield definite results, but that these might always be open to doubt if taken alone. Fortunately at that time there were a number of Necturi in the Laboratory Aquarium, and to these I resorted, on the advice of Professor Wright, obtaining from them my most valuable preparations of the liver. The hepatic cells in these are from two to four times in diameter those in man. It is obvious, therefore, that for ascertaining the relations of nerves to the hepatic cells the liver of Necturus (=Menobranchus) is the most favorable that can be at the disposal of any histologist. I made preparations also from the livers of the dog, rabbit, and frog, which turned out to be of but indifferent value, and recognising that the narrower the field of investigation is the more could attention be bestowed on the necessary details of technical manipulation and of observation, I devoted nearly the whole of my time to winning successful results from the livers VOL, XXVII, PART 4.—NEW SER. Kt 4.40 A. B. MACALLUM. of man and Necturus. There is besides another justification for narrowing the range of the work as I have done, namely, that one of the highest and one of the lowest Vertebrate types are embraced in the investigation. I do not wish to be understood as believing that the results which I here advance are typical of every Vertebrate liver. Indeed, the following pages show a not very close agreement of results from the two types, and it would be hazardous to say which presents the form of nerve termination which has the most general occurrence in other Vertebrate livers. I may be allowed to insist on one point about which the vaguest opinions are allowed to pass currently as correct: the hepatic cell and nerve-tissue are in close connection, not merely by contact, but by actual union. The literature on this subject, what little there is, is full of contradictions or negative statements. Pfliiger, the first observer in this line, came to definite conclusions, itis true, but although experimental physiology has partially confirmed his view, taken as a whole and not in detail, yet the workers since that time who have published descriptions of their researches on the nerves of the liver have found no such connection between these and the hepatic cells as he describes, or, in fact, none at all. The reason for these contradictory results partly is that in nearly every case the researches were based on the Mamma- lian liver, the cellular constituents of which are too small to admit of definitely deciding so difficult a question. I proceed now to give a résumé of the literature on the sub- ject, coupled with a description of the methods employed in each case. A reference to these methods is necessary in order that I may briefly outline their advantages and disadvantages. Pfliiger! used osmic acid to determine the course of the nerves. He found them rarely single, often in bundles, each single fibre dividing frequently and anastomosing, and finally penetrating the membrane of the liver-cells in order to termi- nate in the latter. The fibres retain their myeline investment up to the point of penetrating the cell. The fibres in the 1 «Archiv fiir die ges. Physiologie,’ ii, 1869, also 1871. TERMINATION OF NERVES IN THE LIVER. 441 interior of the cell terminate in a series of fine fibrils with regularly placed granules or swellings along the course of each. Hering! found a rich supply of nerve-fibres entering the portal canal and branching with the vessels running in Glisson’s capsule. Only a few were medullated, the finest bundles con- taining only non-medullated fibrils. Hering was unable to trace any nerves into the hepatic lobules. Nesterowsky” injected the vessels of the cat and dog with coloured glue, and left sections of the organ so treated in a 4 per cent. solution of gold chloride for twenty to twenty-five minutes, after which he put them in a weak solution of glyce- rine acidified with acetic acid, till they took a violet colour, which usually happened in five to fifteen days. In some cases he added a little of a solution of ammonium sulphide in order to bring out the nerves more prominently. He found branches of the portal vein surrounded by a plexus of coarse and fine nerve-fibres. Out of the coarser plexus arise fine anastomosing fibres, forming loops; they enter the lobules and closely twine about the blood-capillaries. Nesterowsky never observed even a connection between these nerve-fibres and the hepatic cells. He could not determine whether the nerves were medullated or not, although he thought he saw in one case examples of the former. Kupffer® followed Nesterowsky’s methods, and came to the conclusion that the fibres considered by the latter as nerves are simply those of connective tissue. He treated sections of the liver obtained by means of a Valentine knife with weak chromic acid solution (0°05 per cent.) and then left them for several days ina 0:01 per cent. solution of gold chloride, when they attained a red or violet colour. By means of this method he demonstrated the so-called ‘stellate cells,’ and at the same time found that the tissues immediately about the central vein of the lobule acquired a violet tint, a fact which indicated, he first thought, the presence of nerve-fibres, but he afterwards ‘ Stricker’s Handbuch,’ p. 452, Leipzig, 1871. 1 2 « Ueber die Nerven der Leber,” ‘ Virchow’s Archiv,’ Bd. 63, p. 412, 1875. 3 “ Ueber Sternzellen der Leber,” £ Arch. fiir Mikr. Anat.,’ Bd, xii, p. 353. 442, A. B. MACALLUM. considered the structures in question to belong to connective tissue, since they acted towards a solution of nickel oxide in ammonia like the latter, and as he found the same sort of fibrils directly entering the lobules from the hepatic serosa. Kolatschewsky! used two methods. In one, fine sections of the liver were pencilled out and treated for ten to twenty minutes with }—1 per cent. solution of gold chloride; these, put in water acidified with acetic acid, were left there for one or two weeks exposed to the light until they became coloured rose violet. According to the other method, sections of liver hardened with ,—;4, per cent. solution of ammonium bichromate were pencilled out and placed in a solution of the double chloride of gold and sodium of the strength recommended by Gerlach. The reduction is accomplished as in the first method. By these methods he found deeply coloured fibres running in the interlobu- lar spaces and entwining ultimately about the capillaries of the lobules. Some of the fibrils end in the nuclei on the capillary walls. The fibres branch, enter into the depth of the lobules, and form there plexuses of fibrils running parallel to and around the vascular channels. The smaller the capillaries the narrower are the meshes of the plexus. Kolatschewsky was not certain that these fibres are nerves, and he never saw their connection with the hepatic cells, if such occurred. His results agree in the main with those of Nesterowsky. Holbrook? made sections of the fresh liver when it was frozen, which he left in a 3 per cent. solution of gold chloride for thirty to forty minutes. The reduction of the gold was accomplished with formic acid. In some cases he hardened the tissue first of all with chromic acid, and then used the foregoing method. He found the nerves in the portal canal provided with a large number of nuclei and occurring usually in bundles of from three to five fibres, which enter the lobules and branch at acute angles along the capillary channels. The finest nerve-fibrille 1 « Beitrage zur Histologie der Leber,” ‘Arch. fiir Mikr. Anat.,’ Bd. xiii, p- 415. 9 2 «The Termination of Nerves in the Liver,” ‘ Proceedings American So- ciety of Microscopists,’ p. 95, 1882. TERMINATION OF NERVES IN THE LIVER. 443 are found running around the capillaries between these and the hepatic cells. They touch, pass between, but do not enter the latter as Pfliger maintains. Holbrook asserts that the fibrils are connected with the cement substance or protoplasmic bridges between the cells, and thereby with the outer portion of the cell reticulum. He also corroborates the results of Nesterowsky’s researches. Meruops. To demonstrate nerve-structures in the liver of Necturus the method employed was as follows: Pieces of the liver were hardened for a week or more in Erlicki’s fluid, or for several days in a +—+ per cent. solution of chromic acid. After the hardening was sufficiently completed in alcohol, sections of the frozen tissue were made with a Cathcart microtome. These, when the gum was carefully removed, were put in a weak solu- tion of formic acid (5 per cent.) for an hour, transferred to a 1 per cent. solution of gold chloride for about twenty minutes, then washed in distilled water, and the gold afterwards reduced in the dark with a 10 per cent. solution of formic acid. About thirty hours sufficed for this reduction when the temperature of the room was 20° C. The sections then had a deep red colour, but sometimes the tinge was violet. The chromatine of the nuclei of the hepatic cells took a deep blue violet tint, the caryoplasma light violet, while the cytoplasma came out very distinct as a meshwork with a pink or light carmine colour, The nerve-fibres appeared deep violet, but the connective tissue of the interlobular spaces attained a light red, sometimes a deep red colour, When chromic acid was used as a hardening reagent the addition of any organic acid at the same time, such as acetic acid more especially, seemed to me to have the effect of robbing the nerve-fibres of their selective capacity for gold, while it increased the effect of the latter on the remaining constituents of the liver. I do not know whether chromic acid or Erlicki’s fluid offers in the method described more advantages. If there is any advantage at all it is to be obtained from the former reagent, AAA A. B. MACALLUM. as with it one is apt to get beautiful preparations of the liver in which the gall-capillaries, gall-ducts, blood-capillaries, the nerves, and the elements of the hepatic cells and their nuclei are demonstrated in a way that I have found equalled by no other method of manipulation. The value of chromic acid and gold chloride in this respect I shall refer to again in a subse- quent paper. Sections of the liver of Necturus are not of any value when they are of less than 0:020 m. in thickness, that being less than half the average diameter of the hepatic cell. In the case of the human liver chromic acid was the only reagent used in hardening. The sections were made with the paraffin method, and were subsequently treated in the manner already outlined. I found that uniformly thick or uniformly thin sections did not answer well, for in these either but short pieces of nerve-fibres or fibrils could be seen, or else they were obscured by the thickness of the section. I managed to obtain sections about half an inch square, which had a thickness at one edge two to three times greater than at the opposite one, so that the thickness decreased gradually from one edge to the other. With these sections I was able to see and follow a fibre in its full extent, together with its divisions or branchlets, and thereby gained all the advantages of a thick and a thin section, with the faults of neither so far as tracing the nerves is con- cerned. The success of the preparations of the human liver was the exception and not the rule. About 10 per cent. or at most 20 per cent. of them only were valuable for all the purposes for which I made them. Sections from the same piece of liver, when treated under exactly like conditions but in different dishes, proved to be not equally successful, some being indif- ferent or worthless. Why this is I do not know. In the case of a very strong colouring with the gold so much as to obscure the structure, I used a } per cent. solution of potassic cyanide as recommended by Cybulsky.! By putting the over-stained tion in this solution the proper depth of colour is obtained 1 «Zeit. fir wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. 39, 8. 657. TERMINATION. OF NERVES, IN THE LIVER. ALS by the solution of the excess of the fixed gold, this process of course being carefully watched. In this reagent one finds an additional advantage; the nerve-fibres are the last to part with the violet colour, thus being distinguished from connec- tive-tissue fibres. It, however, does not always operate in the latter way satisfactorily. The sections of the human liver received from the gold a dull violet or a dull red tint, while in other preparations a blue violet tint was found. In two cases I obtained preparations which to the eye appeared almost colourless, but which on examination demonstrated the nerve-fibres very distinctly. All the sections were cleared in oil of cloves, and mounted in balsam. In the study of the ultimate terminations of the nerves I have used the Leitz ;4, inch homogeneous immersion with special illumination. In the human liver, more especially, it was impossible to do anything with a less efficient objective. In the Necturus liver it was quite easy, however, to see the required structures with a system 7 of Leitz, but I have endeavoured in every case to verify my observations with the higher power objective. The value of gold chloride as a reagent for differentiating nerves is not admitted by all histologists. It has been urged also that the elements it selects in a fresh tissue and those it differentiates in a tissue hardened by a reagent such as chromic acid are not necessarily the same structures. This objection has a great deal of force, especially in view of the fact that gold chloride gives a violet tint to connective tissue which has been first hardened with chromic acid ; the corium of Necturus and the connective tissue around arteries are casesin point, More- over, the tendency of a hardened tissue is to reduce equally the gold so as to give to all the tissue elements a violet colour. Yet with all its faults the method of hardening with chromic acid and the subsequent treatment with gold chloride has many advantages over other micro-chemical and staining reagents, and so far as the demonstration by it of nerve-structures are concerned no greater suspicion should be attached to results 446 A. B. MACCALLUM. obtained with it than to those of other histo-chemical reagents. Gold chloride employed in any way is not an infallible test for nerve-structures, for these have in the end to be determined by their intrinsic form and arrangement, by their origin and termination, or either separately. The violet colour given by gold chloride to fibres otherwise undemonstrable is therefore of accessory value only. It is not known definitely to what organic compound is due the capacity of nerve-fibres for fixing in themselves gold chloride. R. Gscheidlen,! after a series of experiments, came to the conclusion that the reduction is caused by a fatty substance. He treated pieces of the ischiadic nerve of a frog with ether, alcohol, and water respectively, and found that the extract obtained with ether reduces gold in a few hours, while that obtained with alcohol took longer to do the same, the aqueous extract, on the other hand, a very long time. As 90 per cent. of the solid extract obtained with ether is fatty in its nature Gscheidlen drew the inference that a constituent of this fat reduces the gold. I do not think that this explanation will suffice, for nearly all the fat of such an extract must come from the myeline investment of the fibres, and we find that no reduction usually occurs in the medulla. Fol? points out that the violet colour may have another explanation than a mere reduction of the gold, and calls attention to the fact demon- strated by Lindet that this reagent forms double salts with phosphorus compounds, especially the chlorides, which give aqueous solutions of a violet colour. Whether gold chloride undergoes reduction or enters into a more complicated condition it is outside the province of the histologist to determine. It is possible, however, without transgressing limits, to consider some aspects of this question and to suggest some points which may help in the solution It seems to me that the substance which favours the production of a violet colour with gold chloride is diffused through all forms of tissue, and that it is found in a concentrated condition in nerve-tissue only. If a section of 1 ¢ Arch, fiir Mikr. Anat.,’ Bd. xiv, p. 225. * «Tehrbuch der Vergleichenden Microscopischen Anatomie,’ p. 175. TERMINATION OF NERVES IN THE LIVER, 44,7 liver be treated with gold chloride, and the process of colouration be watched, it will be found that the first tinge which the nerve-fibres take is red, and afterwards they show all stages transitional between that colour and violet, while the other systems of tissue slowly pass through the same order of colours to the violet tint. The nuclear chromatine is an exception, being, like nerve-tissue, quick to attain a violet tint. Occa- sionally other structures act like nerve-fibres towards gold, and among these may be mentioned certain paranuclear bodies in the cutaneous epithelium of Necturus which are first coloured red, then rose violet, and finally deep violet. This appears to show that the substance which fixes the gold in a violet form is not confined to nerves, but is diffused to a small degree in other tissue elements. The finest nerve-fibrils being hardly thicker or less delicate than the trabeculz of the cytoplasma, it is wrong to suppose that a reagent which does not specially preserve and fix the latter will do this for the former. It is in this respect that I find the reason for the failure of Nesterowsky, Kolatschewsky, and others to resolve the finer nerve terminations, seeing that the reagents they used for hardening the tissue do not render the cytoplasma distinct and firm, and with it the finer nerve- fibrils. Ammonium bichromate is not a suitable reagent for this purpose, neither is the weak solution of chromic acid such as Kupffer used. The same objection can be urged against the method of freezing the fresh liver in order to obtain sections. The method of gold colouration must not be allowed to injure the cytoplasma. The test which I always exacted of the method employed was the distinct demonstration of the cell reticulum; that being in a good state of preservation, it was only a question of the number of trials with gold chloride in order to get the desired demonstration of the termination of the finest fibrils. I think also that the clearing up of fresh tissue with formic or acetic acid previous to steeping in goid chloride is apt to destroy both the cytoplasma and the finest nerve-fibrils. It is on this ground that I advocate the use of chromic acid to fix these before subjecting them to the action 448 A. B. MACALLUM. of gold chloride, and to the subsequent treatment with formic or acetic acids. Osmic acid, although useful in the case of medullated nerve-fibres, is of no value for demonstrating the finest non-medullated fibrils. Here a few words are necessary concerning the structure of the cytoplasma. In figs. 3, 4, 5, 6 it is represented as a net- work with thickened nodal points. It must be admitted that it does not always appear in such a regular arrangement. The meshes are often much larger and round as if occupied by fat droplets. Often also the trabeculz thin out toward the peri- phery of the cell, so as to be nearly indistinguishable. The specimens of Necturus from which these preparations were made were caught early in March, 1885, and consequently there was but a small amount of fat in the hepatic cells. The appearance presented in the figures is a normal one, for chromic acid material with hematoxylin or aniline dyes show a similar arrangement. Flemming! believes in the arrangement of the cytoplasma in threads throughout the cell, but doubts if these form a network such as Klein? describes. Structures, however, like those drawn in figs. 5 and 6, leave hardly any doubt as to the occurrence of a reticulum. Tur NERVES oF THE Human Liver. In sections of the liver treated successfully with gold chloride the tissues immediately about the interlobular and central veins take a rose-violet or blue-violet colour. These strongly coloured fields, observed with a low-power objective, seem to consist wholly of violet-coloured fibres, but when more highly magnified the latter, which are commonly arranged in bundles, are seen to constitute but a small part of the interlobular tissue, or of that about the central vein, there being between the bundles a quantity of connective tissue coloured light violet orred. The thickest fibres are of about 0:0035 mm. in diameter. Each bundle is composed of a varying number of fibres, and is 1 « Zellsubstanz, Kern, und Zelltheilung,’ Leipzig, 1882, p. 28. 2 “ Observations on the Structure of Cells and Nuclei,” this Journal, vol. Xviil. TERMINATION OF NERVES IN THE LIVER. 449 usually separated from its neighbour by a narrow interspace less in diameter than that of the bundle. The fibres when seen in transverse section are round, and possess nuclei which are closely applied, sometimes at definite intervals. The fibres are wavy in their course, and are clear and homogeneous. They branch frequently, the branches being of diminished size, round, and lacking the nuclei of the larger trunks. They appear in no way to be related to or derived from connective- tissue corpuscles, they do not anastomose with one another, and they nearly always have a parallel direction, decreasing in size as they pass into the smaller divisions of the interlobular canal, where their arrangement in bundles is not so common. The violet colour of the fibres render them remarkably distinct in contrast with the rose-violet connective tissue in which they lie scattered. Sometimes, however, the connective tissue is not coloured at all, but comes out as a granulo- fibrillar appearance which is apt to be overlooked in the presence of the deeply coloured fibres. In these cases the bundles are separated by the granulo-fibrillar substances which penetrates much less prominently between the individual fibres. Where connective tissue and nerve-fibres are coloured alike, it is useful to differentiate between the two with the aid of a weak solution of potassic cyanide. The section being placed on the slide a drop or two of this reagent is added to it and the decolouration watched with a moderately high power. When the interlobular tissue is deprived of its colour to the degree required the section is mounted in the usual way. Under the high power one now finds only a portion of the interlobular tissue retains its violet tint, and this portion is composed of the fibres above referred to. This does not neces- sarily show that the fibres so revealed are nerve-fibres, or definitely distinguish them from those of connective tissue. It, however, seems to agree with the experience of Cybulsky, that in tissue stained with gold chloride, and subsequently treated with potassic cyanide, the nerve-fibres retain their colour longest. 450 A. B. MACALLUM. I have never seen the connection of these fibres with medul- lated nerves, having never found the latter in the liver, but the normal or abnormal occurrence of which in the interlobular canals I do not doubt. Medullated nerve-fibres are sometimes found in unusual places. For example, Cybulsky found a medullated nerve-fibre penetrating the cutaneous epithelium, and I also have seen the same thing in a preparation of epithe- lioma. One may be inclined to believe, therefore, that medul- lated nerve-fibres can and do occur in the liver. It is to be remembered too that gold chloride is not a good reagent for demonstrating the myeline investment of nerves, the occur- rence of which may escape the eye in preparations obtained with the one method. It is quite true, as Kupffer asserts, that in gold preparations violet-coloured tissue passes at places in from the serous covering of the liver between the hepatic cylinders. I gather from his statements that he supposes that no nerves can reach the hepatic tissue in this way. Such a supposition is ground- less, seeing that the serosa and the interlobular tissue are of one and the same origin, and one is as likely as the other to contain nerve-fibres. Where in my preparations the serosa was coloured violet throughout I added a drop of the solu- tion of potassic cyanide, and found, in consequence the same to be true here which I have described for the interlobular canals, namely, the presence of the two types of tissue— nerve and connective, the latter, however, very largely pre- dominating. There are at times interspersed between the bundles of large, violet-coloured fibres, fibrils in which the violet colour is not so distinct, and is more readily removable with potassic cyanide than that of the large fibres, but less so than that of connective tissue. I am doubtful of the significance of these, but they apparently answer to the smaller nerve-fibres of Nesterowsky. I have had no means of determining their connection with the larger fibres. Around the central vein of a lobule both the connective and the nerve-tissue are in small quantity. The nerve-tissue is TERMINATION OF NERVES IN THE LIVER. 451 found absent frequently in otherwise successful preparations, aud the fibres usually are not more than half a dozen, each separated from the other by a considerable interval of space. For tracing the nerve-fibres further to their termination it is necessary to resort to the special sections which I have referred to, namely, those which decrease in thickness from one edge to the opposite one. Ina section of this sort, if the thick edge includes a longitudinal view of one of the interlobular canals, every facility is thereby afforded for following these fibres. intermediate in character as well as in position, between the ectodermal and endodermal nuclei. The multiplication of these nuclei gives rise to a primitive streak, which, as in the Verte- brata, is entirely posterior to the blastopore, and is marked by a longitudinal groove—the primitive groove. This process resembles, in all essential points, the formation of the greater part of the mesoderm in other Tracheata from the walls of the germinal groove, differing only in this, that whereas in the latter the germinal or primitive streak occupies the greater part of the ventral surface, in Peripatus it is confined to the part of the ventral surface behind the anus. I have elsewhere (No. 32) stated my reasons for agreement with Balfour’s view, viz. that such a method of mesoderm formation is probably to be regarded as a modification of archenteric diverticula, such as are found in Amphioxus, &c. Whether the origin of mesoderm from the walls of archenteric diverticula is a primitive process or not is open to grave doubt. It seems to me there is a large body of embryological facts which suggest, at any rate, the view that the mesoderm arose as a result of the differentiation and rearrangement of certain of the nuclei of the amceboid central mass of the ancestral parenchymella or gastrula; that is to say, the facts seem to suggest the following as a possible general view of the origin of the three layers of the Triploblastica. (a) Starting with a large multinucleated Protozoon, the first advance consists in the differentiation of a cortical layer of nuclei and of the protoplasm governed by them into a peripheral layer or ectoderm. This layer was possibly of a plastic nature, and allowed the protrusion of the central mass at one or more points. The central mass would, in consequence of its large size, probably be capable of arrang- ing its vacuoles into a series of thoroughfares through itself from one opening on the surface to another, so that the intro- duction of nutritive matters to its deeper parts would be possible. On the analogy of the Platyhelminth excretory system we may 532 ADAM SEDGWICK. imagine that the protoplasm of these tracts would acquire the property of throwing out vibratile processes into this system of channels for the purpose of assisting in an effective circulation of the external medium through the body. Such an animal would consist, then, of an ectoderm and a central multinucleate mass which, with Metschnikoff, we may call the meso-endoderm. (6) The next change would consist in the differentiation of the nuclei of the meso-endodermic mass into two kinds: (a) those governing the protoplasm lining the differentiated vacuoles ; and (4) the remainder, which would gradually dif- ferentiate into various kinds as evolution progressed. The differentiation of the protoplasm around the nuclei would proceed hand in hand with that of the nuclei; the result being a gradually increasing complexity in the tissues of the animal. The result would be, if the canal system remained complex, —a sponge; if, on the other hand, the canal system simplified and preserved only one opening, the ancestor of the other Metazoa. It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss the evolution of the mesoderm. I merely throw this out as a suggestion, which is supported by the manner and order of development of the layers in many animals (a peeling off, so to speak, from the ovum: (1) of ectoderm; (2) of mesoderm; (3) leaving the endoderm as the remaining central mass), and as a com- pletion of the scheme which I have put forward in discuss- ing the manner of passage from the Protozoa to the Metazoa. , Finally, I would desire to draw attention to the fact (1) that the formation of mesoderm in Peripatus is essentially a forma- tion of nuclei, which pass to their respective positions and arrange themselves in the protoplasmic reticulum there present; and (2) that the primitive streak is the growing point of the animal, from which almost all the tissues of the body of the adult, viz. ectoderm, endoderm, and mesoderm are formed. This is an important point, to which sufficient attention has not been directed. Almost the whole of the embryo, behind DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 538 the fifth or sixth somite—not merely the mesoderm, but all the layers—derives its nuclei from the primitive streak. The primitive streak nuelei are therefore not merely mesodermal, but ectodermal and endodermal as well. 3. The last feature in the development of Peripatus capensis which I would desire to notice in its general bear- ings, is the development of the body cavity and the fate of the cclom. The coelom, as is well known, is the term applied to a body cavity with certain characters—characters which may be summed up in the following terms :—(1) The coelom does not communicate with the vascular system; (2) it communicates with the exterior by nephridial pores ; (3) its lining gives rise to the generative products; (4) it develops either as one or more diverticula from the primitive enteron, or as a space or spaces in the unsegmented or segmented mesoblastic bands (in the latter case called mesoblastic somites). The vascular space has none of these characters, and is known as a pseudoceelic space: it develops either from the blastocele or from asystem of channels hollowed out in the mesodermic tissue of the body. In the Annelida and Ver- tebrata these two spaces co-exist, and present a well-marked contrast to one another; while in the two other great groups of the animal kingdom—the Mollusca and Arthropoda— the relations of the two systems has not been thoroughly understood. We will first consider the case of the Arthro- poda. The body cavity in the Arthropoda has generally been regarded as ccelomic, in spite of the fact that it presents none of the ordinary celomic characters. It communicates with the vascular system, it does not open to the exterior by nephridial pores, its lining does not, so far as is known, develope the generative cells, for the generative glands are continuous with their ducts, and, so far asis known, have no connection with the body cavity. Neither has the body cavity been traced into connection with the undoubted ceelom of the embryo. In all the groups of the Arthropoda mesoblastic somites with a more 534 ADAM SEDGWICK. or less well-marked cavity are formed in the embryo; but the fate of these structures has never been followed. We do not know whether their cavities enlarge and unite with one another and give rise to the body cavity and vascular system of the adult, or whether they shrivel up and disappear, their walls only remaining as part of the mesoderm. From what has been said it is also clear that it is impossible to say whether in the Arthropoda the vascular system is nipped off from the coelom, or whether it arises as a separate set of spaces in the mesoderm, as in Annelids and Vertebrates. Now, Peripatus is a true Arthropod so far as its body cavity is concerned: thus the heart drives the blood into it, and by means of the paired cardiac ostia sucks the blood out of it; it does not communicate with the exterior by nephri- dial pores, nor does its lining develope generative cells. We are therefore justified in regarding the body cavity of Peripatus as homologous with that of other Arthropoda. It results from this that the study of the development of the body cavity in Peripatus, which can be traced with comparative ease, must be of extreme interest, as tending to clear up the question of its celomic or non-ccelomic nature in Arthropoda generally. Kennel was the first to trace the body cavity of Peripatus. He showed that it was in part, at any rate, a pseudoceele, but his work was incomplete in that he failed to follow correctly the fate of the celom. He thought that the celom became merged into the body cavity. If this were correct, it would follow that in Peripatus the vascular system and ccelom would be in communication. As has been fully shown in the preceding pages, this is not the case. The celom of Peripatus can be traced through the whole development, as a system of spaces shut off at all stages of its growth from the system of body-cavity spaces. In the adult Peripatus the ccelom is in the following condition: (1) a series of nephridia ending internally in small thin-walled closed vesicles ; (2) two dorsal tubes—the generative glands and the ducts of these, which latter are derived from one pair DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 539 of posterior somites. The pericardium, heart, whole of the body cavity (central, lateral, and leg compartments) are exclu- sively pseudoccelic in origin. In Peripatus, therefore, the gonads are cclomic, and their ducts what Lankester would call nephrodinic. The condition of the body cavity and cceelom of Peripatus will be best appreciated by comparing it with that of the same organs in an Annelid, suchas Lumbricus. 1. In Lumbricus the structures corresponding to the nephridial vesicles of Peripatus have swollen up and united with one another in pairs across the middle dorsal and ventral lines, and after some time have become united with one another longitudinally, though the separating walls between successive somites for the most part persist ; they constitute the coelomic body cavity of Lumbricus. 2. In Peripatus the vascular channels, excepting the heart, are swollen out to wide channels, more or less completely continuous with one another, so as to form four or five main vascular tracts, while in Lumbricus they are present as minute, branching, well-defined canals. On comparing Peripatus with other Arthropodain this con- nection we are at once met with these facts : (1) that in no other Arthropod are nephridia, recognisable as such, present ; (2) that the cavities of the somites cannot be traced beyond a compara- tively early stage of development; (3) that the early stages of the generative organs have not been thoroughly made out. We may, however, with fair probability predict, from what we know (1) of the development of Peripatus, and (2) of the resemblance of its body cavity to that of other Arthropods, that when the development of the latter has been fully worked out it will be found that the ccelom of the embryo persists as the generative tubes and their ducts, but for the most part vanishes (possibly giving rise to glands of a doubtful nephridial nature), and that the body cavity and vascular system has an exclusively pseudoccelic origin. In the Mollusca the ccelom and vascular space have not been generally sufficiently distinguished from one another. There seems, however, to be no doubt that the pericardial VOL. XXVII, PART 35.—NEW SER. PP 539 ADAM SEDGWICK. cavity of the Lamellibranchiata and Gasteropoda repre- sents the entire celom. The reasons for this conclusion are (1) the pericardial cavity is always shut off from the vascular system; (2) it communicates with the exterior by a pair of nephridia. The generative organs have no relation to the ccelom, so far as is known, in either of the above Molluscan gronps; but in the Cephalopoda the generative cells are developed from the mesoderm lining a certain part of the celom. This gene- rative part of the ccelom seems, however, to be shut off in the adult from the viscero-pericardial sac. This fact, viz. the coelomic nature of the generative organs of the Cephalopoda, together with the fact that in other Molluscs the generative organs either dehisce into one of the nephridia, which morphologically are part of the cclom, or possess ducts which open close to or into the nephridial ducts, seems, to say the least of it, in favour of the view that the generative organs of all Molluscs were originally coelomic and that the present arrangement found in the majority is secondary. The question, of course, can only be settled definitely by em- bryological investigations, but, unfortunately, embryology does not speak clearly on the point. There can then, from the point of view of adult anatomy, be but little doubt that the pericardial cavity (and viscero-peri- cardial and generative sacs in Cephalopoda) alone is ccelomic in the Mollusca, and that the other system of spaces whether simulating a body cavity asin Chiton and other Gastero- poda, or forming a close meshwork of spaces as in Lamel- libranchs, are vascular and non-celomic spaces; and it is only necessary for embryology to bear out this conclusion to settle the matter definitely. Unfortunately, embryologists have not for the most part sufficiently regarded in their investigations the importance of the point, and, for the majority of Mollusca, we are in ignorance as to the exact method of development of the pericardium as opposed to the heart and vascular spaces. Rabl (No. 26), Patten (No. 25 a), and Ziegler (No. 36) have described mesoblastic bands in Planorbis, Patella, and DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 537 Cyclas respectively, arising in the typically Annelidan manner; but Ziegler, so far as I am aware, has alone succeeded in ascer- taining what part these bands take in the formation of the peri- cardium, generative organs and kidney. The generative cells are derived from the mesoblastic bands. The pericardial cavity arises as two cavities—one in each band—which subsequently unite. The kidneys are hollowed out in certain masses of cells of the bands. These results, if generally applicable, appear to con- firm absolutely the anatomical proof of the celomic nature of the Molluscan pericardium. It is interesting to notice that in Ziegler’s figure (fig. 27) the developing pericardial vesicles have exactly the same relation to the primary body cavity or vas- cular space, i.e. they lie within it, as the nephridial vesicles of Peripatus have to the vascular cavity of the leg. There are certain animals to which the above general con- siderations as to the distinctness of the ccelom and vascular system do not apply. I refer more especially to the N ermer- tinea and Hirudinea. In the Nermertinea, according to Oudemans (No. 24), and in the Hirudinea, according to Bourne (No. 4a), structures which it is difficult to believe are not nephridia open into the vascular system. Ido not intend to discuss these cases now, because, on the one hand, this paper is already too long, and because, on the other, I do not think our present knowledge is sufficient to enable this to be done with profit. But I venture to submit with regard to them that it is not clear in either case that the vascular system into which the nephridia open is homologous with that of other types. The very fact that there is a communication with the exterior is a strong point in favour of the space being celomic ; and it should be remembered that very little is known with regard to its development in either group. In conclusion, I may point out, that whereas in most animals, e.g. Annelida, Mollusca, the vascular space or pseudoceele appears before the celom, in Peripatus the ceelom appears first, and that in Arthropods, at least, the vascular space is in the early stages very commonly occupied by yolk, while the celom is entirely free from yolk. ‘This latter 5388 ADAM SEDGWICK. fact would seem to imply some connection between the vas- cular space and the enteric space; and I would also desire to point out that the ccelom, generative glands, and nephridia can, in all animals whose development is at all well known, be traced back to a very early embryonic structure, which appears at the very beginning of development, gives rise to no other structures, and itself arises in very different ways in different animals. ‘The embryonic structure [ refer to is in some cases the mesoblastic bands, and in others enteric diverticula. That these two kinds of coelomic rudiments, as I may call them, are homologous cannot be doubted, but which, if either, of the methods of origin is primitive, cannot in my opinion at present be settled. SUMMARY OF THE ABOVE REMARKS ON THE C@LOM AND Bopy Cavity. Tt is well known that the vascular system of the Arthropoda is in direct communication with the body cavity, and that the vessels are, for the most part, very rudimentary. In fact the blood is driven by the heart or dorsal vessel into the body cavity, and returned directly through the lateral cardiac ostia into the heart. In no other group of animals does this direct communication exist between the heart and the pericardium. It is therefore important to determine by the study of development, whether or no the blood-containing body and pericardial cavities of the Arthropoda are homologous with the corresponding structures of other types, in which they do not contain blood. The development of the Arthropodan heart and body cavity is in most cases extremely difficult to follow on account of the large amount of food yolk present in the embryos, and there is not, at present, any completely satisfactory history of it. The development of Peripatus capensis, which is a true Arthropod, so far as its body cavity and vascular system are concerned, is comparatively easy to follow. The coelom appears in the ordinary manner as a series of cavities, one in each mesoblastic somite. The somites, which are at first ventro-lateral in position, DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPR SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 539 soon acquire a dorsal extension, and the cavity in each of them becomes divided into two parts—a ventral part which passes into the appendage, and a dorsal part which comes into contact but does not unite with its fellow of the opposite side on the dorsal wall of the enteron. The dorsal portions of the somites early become obliterated in the anterior part of the body, but posteriorly they persist, and those of the same side unite with each other so as to form two tubes which are the generative glands. The ventral or appendicular portions persist and retain their original isolation throughout life. They give rise to two structures : (1) To a coiled tube, which acquires an external opening through the ventral body wall at the base of the appendage and constitutes the nephridium of the adult ; (2) To a small vesicle, which is contained in the appendage and constitutes the internal blind end of the tubular or nephri- dial portion of the somite. (The opening of the nephridium into the vesicle is funnel shaped, and is commonly known as the internal funnel-shaped opening of the former.) From the above account it follows (1) that the ccelom of the embryo of Peripatus capensis gives rise to the nephridia and generative glands, but to no part of the body cavity of the adult ; (2) that the nephridia of the adult do not open into the body cavity. The body cavity of the adult consists, as is well known, of four divisions :—(a) the central compartment containing the intestine and generative organs, (4) the pericardial cavity, (c) the lateral compartments containing the nerve-cords and salivary glands, and (d) the portion in the appendage. Of these, without going into details, it may be said that a arises as a space between the ectoderm and the endoderm, 8, c, and d as spaces in the thickened somatic walls of the somites. The spaces are in communication with each other. The heart arises as a part of a@ which becomes separated from the rest. Posteriorly it acquires paired openings into the pericardium. It thus appears that the heart and various 540 ADAM SEDGWICK. divisions of the body cavity of the adult form a series of spaces which have nothing to do with the celom. They all com- municate with each other and seem to form a series of enor- mously dilated vascular trunks, of which the heart is the narrowest and alone possesses the property of rhythmically contracting. To sum up it appears that the colom in Peripatus is an inconspicuous structure in the adult, and has no connection with the body cavity ; while, on the other hand, the spaces of the vascular system are but little subdivided, and form the heart and various divisions of the adult body cavity. Tf these results are applicable to the Arthropoda generally, and there is no reason, from the similarity of the adult anatomy, to doubt that they will be found to be so, the following mor- phological features may be added to those generally stated as appertaining to the group—ccelom inconspicuous, body cavity consisting entirely of vascular spaces. In Vertebrates and most Annelids, on the other hand, the parts in question are arranged as follows:—Body cavity entirely celomic; vascular spaces broken up into a complicated system of channels (arteries, veins, capillaries). In most Molluscs, finally, the pericardium alone is ccelomic ; the vascular spaces being represented by the heart and the more or less complicated system of spaces in the body. List oF PAPERS REFERRED TO. 1. Baxrour, F. M.—‘ A Treatise on Comparative Embryology,’ vol. i, London, 1885 (2nd ed.). 2. Batrour, F. M.—‘A Treatise on Comparative Embryology,’ vol. ii, London, 1881. 3. Ba.rour, F. M.—“ Notes on the Development of the Araneina,” ‘ Quart. Journ. of Mier. Sci.,’ vol. xx. 4. Batrour, F. M.—‘‘ Anatomy and Development of Peripatus capen- sis,” ‘Quart. Journ. of Micro. Sci.,’ vol. xxiii. 4a. Bournr, A. G.—‘‘ Contributions to the Anatomy of the Hirudinea,” © Quart. Journ. of Micro. Sci.,’ vol. xxiv. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. d41 5. 21. 22. 23. . Kennet, J.—“ Entwick. v. Peripatus Edwardsii u. torquatus,’ Brooxs, W. K.—“ Lucifer: a Study in Morphology,” ‘ Phil. Trans.,’ 1882. . CraPaRbpE.—“ Studien iiber Acarinen,” ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool., Bd. xviii. . Fremurne, W.— Zellsubstanz, Kern, und Zelltheilung,’ Leipzig, 1882. . Garrron, E.—“ Beitrige zur Anatomie u. Histologie von Peripatus,” Schneider’s ‘ Zoologische Beitrage,’ Bd. i, p. 33. . Garrron.— Beitrage zur Anatomie und Histologie von Peripatus,” ibid., p. 145. . Hacxet, E.—‘“‘ Die Physemarien (Haliphysema und Gastrophy- sema),” ‘Jena. Zeitschrift,’ 1877. . Heatucots, F. G.—‘ The Early Development of Julus terrestris,’’ ‘Quart. Journ. of Mier. Sci.,’ vol. xxvi, p. 449. . Hatscuex, B.—“ Zur Entwick. des Kopfes von Polygordius,” ‘ Arbei- ten a. d. Zool. Inst. Wien,’ Bad. vi. . Kennet, J.—“ Entwickelungsgeschichte v. Peripatus Edwardsii und P. torquatus,” ‘Arbeiten a. d. Zool. Inst. Wirzburg,’ Bd. vii. 2 Theil ii, ‘ Arbeiten a. d. Zoo). Inst. Wurzburg,’ Bd. viii. . Kietvenserc, N.—“ The Development of the Earthworm Lumbricus trapezoides,” ‘Quart. Journ. of Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xix. 3. Kowatrvsky, A.—‘ Etude sur ’Embryologie du Dentale,” ‘ Annales du Musée d’Histoire Naturelle de Marseille ’—‘ Zoologie,” vol. i. . Kowa.Evsky and Marron.—“ Documents pour l’Histoire embryogenique des Aleyonaire,” ibid. . LANKESTER, E, Ray.—‘‘The Structure of Haliphysema Tumano- > wiczii,” ‘Quart. Journ. of Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xix, p. 476. . Leypic, F.—‘ Zelle u. Gewebe,’ 1885. . LirperKtUHN.— Beitrage zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Spongillen,’ ’ ‘ Miiller’s Arch.,’ 1856. MarsHaLt, W.—‘ Die Ontogoniev. Reniera filigrana,” ‘ Zeit. f. wiss, Zool.,’ Bd. 37. Metscunikorr, E.— Spongiologische Studien,” ‘Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. 32. Metscunikxorr, E.—‘ Embryologische Studien an Medusen,’ Wien, 1886. 23a. MoseLey, H. N.—“ On the Structure and Development of Peripatus 24. capensis,” ‘ Phil. Trans.,’ 1874. OvuprEmans, A. C.—‘The Circulatory and Nephridial Apparatus of the Nemertea,” ‘ Quart. Journ. of Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xxv, Supplement, p. 1. 25. Patten, W.—* The Development of Phryganids,” ‘Quart. Journ. of Mier. Sci.,’ vol. xxiv, 1884. 542 ADAM SEDGWICK. 25a. Patten, W.— The Embryology of Patella,” ‘ Arbeiten a. d. Zool. Inst. Wien,’ Bd. vi. 26. Ras, C.— Ueber die Entwick. d. Tellerschnecken (Planorbis),” ‘Morph, Jahrbuch,’ v, 1879. 97. SALENSKy, W.—“ Etudes sur le developpement des Annélides,” ‘ Archives de Biologie,’ 3 and 4. 98. Savinte-Kent.—‘ Manual of the Infusoria,’ London, 1881-82. 29. Scnuizz, F. E.— Trichoplax adherens,” ‘ Zoologischer Anzeiger,’ 1883, p- 92. 30. Scuutze, F. E.—“ Die Familie der Aplysinide,’ ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’ id xxx. 31. Sepewick, A.A—“‘On the Original Function of the Canal of the Central Nervous System,” ‘Studies from the Morphological Laboratory, Cam- bridge,’ vol. ii, Pt. 1. 82. Sepewick, A.---‘‘On the Origin of Metameric Segmentation,” ‘ Quart. Journ. of Micro. Sci.,’ vol. xxiv. 33. Sepewick, A.—“ The Development of Peripatus capensis,” ‘ Proc. Roy. Soc.,’ 1885. 33a. Sepewick, A.—“On the Development of the Cape Species of Peri- patus,” Pts. I and II, ‘Quart. Journ. of Micro. Sci.,’ vols. xxv and XXvi. 34. Sottas, W. J.—“On the Development of Halisarca lobularis,” ‘Quart. Journ. of Micro. Sci.,’ vol. xxiv. 35. SpencEL.— Notes on Sipunculus,” ‘Tagebl. Naturf. Vers. Miinchen,’ 1877. 36. ZineterR, H. H.—* Die Entwick. v. Cyclas cornea,”’ ‘ Zeit. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xli, p. 525. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 543 EXPLANATION OF PLATES XXXIV, XXXV, MXXVE & MXXVII, Illustrating Mr. A. Sedgwick’s Paper on “ The Development of the Cape Species of Peripatus.” List of Reference Letters. a. Anus. am. Amoeboid wandering cells in body cavity (pseudoccele). a. s. ph. Septum attaching anterior part of pharynx to dorsal body wall, at junction of somites 1 and 2. a. v. Anterior diverticulum of nephridium of oral papilla. &. Space formed by withdrawal of endoderm from ectoderm. b. Space formed in the parietal thickening of the somites. 4. app. Space formed in appendage. 4. dc. Space formed by separation of endoderm from ventral ectoderm. 0. dc\..The ventral of the two spaces formed in wall of somites at their ventral corner. 4. 4. Space formed by separation of endoderm from dorsal ectoderm. 4. /at. Space formed in parietal mesoderm. 0. pe. The dorsal of the two spaces formed in the wall of the somites at their ventral corner. Or. Brain. duc. cav. Buccal cavity. cc. c. Cords of cells projecting into pericardial cavity. c.g. Cerebral grooves. c.g. Groove in brain. com. Commissure between the two halves of the brain. c. 0. 2. Circumoral part of central nervous system. d. . Dividing nuclei of endoderm near the lip of the blastopore. d.s. Dorsal sheet of somatic mesoderm. d.s. 1, 2, &. Dorsal part of somites 1, 2, &c. e. Hye. ec. Hctoderm. ez. Endoderm. /. Funnel-shaped opening of tubular part of nephridium into internal vesicle. F.1, &. Legs. (f. dl. Line of obliterated blastopore between the mouth and anus. gez. Germinal nuclei. gez. d. Genital duct. gez. 0. Generative organ. g.andy.g. Alimentary canal. J. Jaw. 7. s. Ventral organ of jaw. I. Lips. /e. Internal backward projection of jaw. 7. 7. Limb-ridge. 7.8.1, 2. &. Lateral portions of somite contained in the legs. 7. s.¢. 1, 2, &c. Tubular portion of nephridial celom of appendages 1, 2, &c. (segmental organ). 1. s.v.1, 2, &. Internal vesicular portion of nephridial ccelom of appendages 1, 2, &c. M. Mouth. mé. Mesoblastic band. me. Anterior part of thickening of parietal mesoderm of the somites. m./. Muscles of internal projection of jaws. m.ph. Muscular wall of pharynx. mm. ¢. Posterior part of thickening of parietal mesoderm of the somites. 0.7.1, 2, &c. The external opening of nephridium of somites 1,2, &c. or. p. Oral papilla. 0. s. 3. Opening of somite 3. p.g. Primitive groove. pf. Pharynx. ph. m. Pharyngeal meso- derm from the splanchnic walls of the anterior somites. p. p. pre-oral pouch of alimentary canal. pr. Proctodeal lining. p. sf. Primitive streak. 544 ADAM SEDGWICK. R. Rectum. 98. 1, 2, 3, &c. The first, second, and third somites, &c. sal. gl. Salivary gland. sep. Septum dividing the lateral portion of the somite from the dorsal. s/.g. Slime-gland. J. 0. 1. Rudimentary nephridial portion of somite. s¢. Stomodeum or its lining. 7. Tongue. v. ex. Ventral endoderm of alimentary canal derived from the cells intermediate between the ectoderm and endoderm when the blastopore was open along its whole length. v. 2. Ventral nerve-cord. v.0. Ventral organ. v.s. Ventral sheet of somatic mesoderm. v. sp. Vascular space. . White matter of central nervous system. All the figures are of Peripatus capensis, and drawn with Zeiss’s camera, ob. C, oc. 2, unless it is otherwise stated. Fic. 1.—Transverse section through a late embryo of Stage a (length *53 mm.), two sections behind the blastopore. The primitive groove is very deep and is hardly to be distinguished from the blastopore. The mesoblastic bands do not extend in front of the hind end of the blastopore. The primi- tive groove was confined to the front end of the streak. The latter extended through eighteen sections. ; Fics. 2 and 3.—Two transverse sections through an embryo of Stage B (length *65 mm.) with one somite, still solid, and separate from the front end of the mesoblastic band. Primitive streak extended through twenty-one sections. Fig. 2. Through the single somite which is present. (The section is slightly oblique, passing in front of the somite on the left side.) Fig. 3. Two sections in front of the anterior end of the somite. The endodermal nuclei at the lips of the blastopore were dividing actively. One such is shown at d. x. Fic. 4.—Section through a late embryo of Stage B (Stage of fig. 25, Pt. I) in front of the mouth. Reduced 3. Fic. 5, a—f—A series of sections through an embryo (length 1 mm.) of the same age as the last (Stage B, fig. 25, Pt. I). Reduced 3. Four separate somites could be distinctly made out on each side. Thirty sections were obtained through the streak. The groove extends the whole length of the streak. a. Through the mouth. b. Between the mouth and anus. The blastopore lips have fused ; their line of fusion is marked by a slight groove (f. 4/.). ec. Through the hind end of the anus. The mesoblastic bands in this region are not yet broken up into somites. d. Through the front end of the primitive streak, four sections behind the last. e. Through primitive streak, eight sections behind last. J. Through primitive streak, nine sections behind the last. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 9545 Fic. 6, a—d.—A series of sections through an embryo of Stage c (fig. 26, Pt. 1). Reduced 3. a. In front of the mouth, through the pre-oral lobes. he anterior wall of the alimentary (ez.) just touched. 6. Through the mouth. c. Between the mouth and anus. Wide separation of the somites. Very thin ventral ectoderm . d. Through the hind end of the body, in the region of the curvature. The embryo is cut in two places, through the anus and through the growing point (primitive streak and gr oove). Fics. 7—12 are from a young embryo of Stage p (fig. 28, Pt. I). The embryos of this age are always much narrower, both dorso-ventrally and laterally, than those older or younger. Reduced 3. Fig. 7. Section through the roots of the b udding antenne. Fig. 8. Through the anterior part of the mouth. Fig. 9. Through the posterior part of the third somite, in the region of the outgrowth of the oral papilla (or. p.). The sheets of cells extend- ing from the dorsal and ventral ends of the somites are present (d. s. and v.s.). The endoderm and ectoderm have separated from one another, excepting along the dorsal middle line. The cavity so formed is marked 4. 4. and 6. dc. Fig. 10. Through the anterior part of the fourth somite (in front of the region of the future leg), to show the anterior part of the thickening ‘of the somatic mesoderm (me.). Fig. 11. Through the region of the future leg (posterior part of the somite), showing the position of the thickening on the ventral side of the outgrowth. Fig. 12. Through the fifth somite. The changes which have produced the parietal mass of cells from the somatic mesoderm have not yet occurred here. The somite is partly collapsed dorsally and ventrally. Fie. 13.—Through the third somite of an em bryo of Stage p, slightly older than the last. Reduced 3. On the left haud side the section passes through the posterior part of the somite, and shows the developing oral papilla and septum tending to divide the cavity of the somite into a part within the appendage and a part within the body. ‘The first trace of the third system of body cavity (4. dat.) is visible. Fic. 14.—Section through an embryo of Stage p, through the pre-oral somite, brain, and eye. The latter (e.) has the form of an open pit. Re- duced 3. Fie. 15.—Section through a slightly older embryo, showing a more ad- vanced stage in the brain and eye. Reduced 2. 546 ADAM SEDGWICK. Fic. 16, a, 6.—Two sections through the mouth of a late embryo of Stage D (fig. 29, Pt. I). Reduced 3. ad. Through the anterior part in the region of the stomodeal in- growth. b. Through the posterior part. Fic. 17, a—d.—A series of sections through the region of the third somite of an embryo of same age as the last (fig. 29, Pt. 1). Reduced 4. a. Through the anterior part of the somite, in front of the attachment of the parietal thickening (me.). The parietal thickening always appears to be free in front; it is attached behind. 6. Point of attachment of parietal thickening to somatic mesoderm. c. Two sections further back. d. Six sections further back through the region of the appendage (or. p.). Fie. 18, a—c.—Three sections through the seventh somite of the same embryo as that from which fig. 17 was taken. Reduced 4. a and & show the leg-ridge, which in fig. 18c—a section through the hinder part of the somite—is enlarged to form the developing fourth leg. A few sections behind Fig. 18 ¢ the cavity of the somite extends into the appendage. The anterior less developed part of the mesodermal thickening lies immediately within the leg-ridge, while the posterior larger part occupies the appendage itself. Fies. 19, a, 6; 20; 21, a—c are from sections through young embryos of Stage BE. Reduced 3. a. Through the head and first somite. The optic pit is closed. b. Through the mouth and first somite. This section shows the developing lip (Z.). In this and the previous section the mesoderm cells next the stomodzal ectoderm have proliferated to form the com- mencing pharyngeal and lingual musculature. Fig. 20. Through the second somite, with the third somite overlapping dorsally. Fig. 21 a. Through the anterior part of the third somite. The limb- ridge (/. 7.) and the mesodermal thickening with its cavity (0. Jat.) are well shown. 6. Ten sections further back, through the anterior part of the appen- dage (oral papilla). The mesodermal thickening is much larger. c. Through the centre of the appendage. The somite is nearly divided into two parts by the septum (sep.). The portion in the appen- dage sends down a diverticulum, which lies against the outer border of the nerve-cord and reaches the ectoderm. Figs. 22—- 25 are through a late embryo of Stage ©. Reduced $. DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 54:7 a. Through the pre-oral region, at the level of the cerebral commissure. The commencing cerebral groove (c. g.) is shown. b. Through the mouth and hind end of first somite, showing the rudimentary nephridium (s. 0. 1). One half of the section only is represented. (Drawn with Zeiss’s D, oc. 2). Fig. 23, a—e. A series through the third somite. a. The anterior part of the mesodermal thickening and its cavity (d’.) is much enlarged. The section passes through the hind end of the jaw (J.) and the lip (Z.). b. A few sections further back. A tube (a. v.) ending blindly in front, and opening behind into the limb portion of the somite, is present. c. Nine sections behind fig. 23 4, through the point of junction of the portion of the somite in the body (s. 3), the portion in the appendage (/. s. 3), and the anterior diverticulum (a. v. of Fig. 23 0). d. Through the centre of the appendage, seven sections behind the last. The anterior end of the fourth somite (s. 4) is visible, and rudiment of the slime-gland as an ectodermal ingrowth at the apex the of the oral papilla (s/. g.) is present. e. Nine sections behind the last. The external opening of the third somite covered over by the lip (Z.), which has grown back to this point, and the mesodermal thickening and its cavity (4. Jat.) of the wall of the fourth somite are present. Fig. 24. Between the oral papilla and first leg, through the fourth somite, twelve sections behind fig. 23 e. Fig. 25. Through the fourth leg. The eighth somite overlaps dorsally. The leg portion of the seventh somite opens to the exterior (0. s. 7). The great ectodermal thickening, which is so conspicuous in embryos of this stage, is cut through at d. Fic, 26.—Transverse section through the anus and twentieth somite of an embryo of Stage p. The rudiment of the proctodeum with its special lining (pr.) is present. The germinal nuclei (gez.) are present, both in the endoderm and splanchnic mesoderm. Fic. 27.—Transverse section through an embryo of Stage =, at the region of the seventeenth somite. The germinal nuclei are present in large numbers. The ccelom has not yet become divided into body and leg portions (see right hand side of section). Fic. 28.—Longitudinal vertical section through an embryo of Stage c. The section passes through mouth and anus. The hind end of the body is bent round and projects forward, bearing the primitive streak on its ventral surface. The alimentary canal reaches the anterior end of the body, and the transverse commissure (com.) connecting the two halves of the cerebral ganglion is visible in front of the mouth. The modified endoderm (s/.) or 548 ADAM SEDGWICK. ingrown ectoderm—whichever view of its nature be taken—of the anterior (future dorsal) wall of the stomodeum is present. Zeiss’s A, oc, 2. Fic. 29.—Longitudinal vertical section through an embryo of Stage D. The hind end of the body has grown and become spirally coiled. The primi- tive streak is still present—but in a rudimentary form—on the ventral surface behind the anus. It is marked by a slight pit. A section to one side of the middle line of this embryo shows a considerable mass of nuclei in connection with it. The anterior end of the body has been drawn back in such a way that no part of the alimentary canal projects in front of the mouth. The anterior wall of the stomodeum is therefore now inclined dorsalwards and slightly backwards. Zeiss’s A, oc. 2. Fig. 30.—Longitudinal vertical section through the hind end of an embryo of Stage E. The anus is now practically terminal, and the primitive streak aborted. A rudiment of the latter still indeed exists, but there are no lateral masses of nuclei. The rudiment of the proctodeum is present (also in the last figure). Zeiss’s A, oc. 2. Fic. 31.—Longitudinal vertical section through the anterior end of an embryo of Stage EB. Zeiss’s C, oc. 2. Reduced 34. The anterior ectodermic wall of the body has grown forward in the middle line, and separated from the anterior wall of the alimentary canal (cf. fig. 34, Pt. I). The anterior wall of the stomodzum has now become its dorsal wall, and is directed backwards ; and an anterior pouch of the alimentary canal lies dorsal to it. The ventral wall of the stomodeeum has began to be formed. Fic. 32.—Longitudinal horizontal section through the anterior end of an embryo of Stage D. Zeiss’s A, oc. 2. Fics. 833—42 are transverse sections of an embryo of Stage F. Fig. 33. Through the first somite, brain and cerebral grooves. The section passes in front of the region where the two halves of the brain are connected, and the eye (e.) is just included in the section on the right side. Reduced 4. Fig. 34. The section is taken at the junction of somites 1 and 2, and passes through the posterior part of the brain, the anterior part of the permanent buccal cavity, and the anterior wall of the pharynx (pA.) The posterior part of the cerebral grooves (c. g.) are seen opening into the buccal cavity, the roof (Z.) of which becomes the so-called tongue of the adult. The jaw (J.) is visible on the right side. Reduced 3. Fig. 35. Through the mouth (m.) ; the opening which leads from the buccal cavity into the pharynx. In consequence of the contraction of the ectoderm, the second somite (s. 2) is hardly visible, and the median part of the space J. A. is obliterated. Reduced 3. Fig. 36. Behind the mouth, through the oral papille (07. .). The slime- gland (s/.g.) is cut through just behind its opening, and the anterior DEVELOPMENT OF THE CAPE SPECIES OF PERIPATUS. 549 part of the ventral ccelom of the third som ite (internal vesicular por- tion, 7. s.3.) is shown. Reduced 3. Fig. 37. Immediately behind the junction of the pharynx and mesenteron, through the external opening of the salivary gland (ventral division of somite 3) into the hinder part of the buccal cavity (duc. cav.). Fig. 38. Through the dorsal division of somite 4 and the hind part of the ventral division of somite 3, the opening between the two parts (in- ternal vesicular portion, /. s. v. 3, and tubular portion, /. s. ¢.3) of which are shown. m./. Muscles of internal projection of jaws. Fig. 38 a. One side of a section, a little behind fig. 38, to show the com- mencing salivary gland (sal.g.). Zeiss’s D, oc. 2. Reduced 3. Fig. 39. Between the oral papilla and first leg. Fig. 40. Through the third leg, to show the ventral division of the sixth somite. The tubular portion of this (nephridium of third leg) isa straight tube (the lumen is not distinct, but this was probably due to the contraction of the specimen), opening externally at o. z. 6, and in- ternally into the internal vesicular portion (J. s. . 6). Fig. 41. Through the twentieth somite, in the region of the generative cells. The differentiation of the various divisions of the body cavity has hardly reached this part of the body, 4.4., d.pc., 6.dc'., being only present in a rudimentary form. The endoderm is slightly shrivelled up. The generative nuclei are still in the endoderm, though some of them project into the body cavity. Zeiss’s D, oc. 2. Reduced 3. Fig. 42. Through the rectum and anal papille (rudimentary eighteenth leg). The dorsal and ventral divisions of the somite are in communication. Fics. 43—46 are from old embryos of Stage F. Zeiss’s D, oc. 2. Re- duced 4. Fig. 43. Through the seventeenth somite, to show the dorsal division of the somite (d.s.), which may now be called the generative gland. The gut has separated from the latter, so that the two divisions of the part of the body cavity marked 4. dc’. communicate. The dorsal part of the section only is drawn. Fig. 44. Through the anal papilla (rudimentary eighteenth leg) and twenty- first somite. The two parts of the somite are in communication, and the ventral has almost acquired an opening to the exterior. This opening will be the generative opening. Figs. 45 and 46.—Dorsal parts of two transverse sections from the middle region of the body in front of the generative region ; 46 is the anterior. In 45 the dorsal division of the somite (d.s.) is not yet obliterated; in 46 it has entirely vanished, and is represented only by the thickened layer of cells which form the veutral wall of the heart. Fies. 47 and 48.—Through the generative organs of an embryo of Stage «, 550 ADAM SEDGWICK. in the region where they are detached from the pericardial floor. Zeiss’s F, oc. 2. Fic. 49.—Longitudinal vertical section through the anterior part of the body of an embryo of Stage r. Reduced 3. Fic. 50.—One side of a transverse section throngh a young embryo of Stage F. To show the latest stage of the rudimentary nephridium of the first somite (s. 0. 1), in close contact with the outer side of the hind part of the brain (a few nuclei of the latter are indicated). Zeiss’s D, oc. 2. Reduced 3. Fic. 51.—One side of a transverse section through the brain of a late em- bryo of Stage r. To show the two separate parts of the first somite. The cerebral grooves are closed. Reduced 3. Fic. 52.—Transverse section of the sixth leg of an old embryo of Stage Fr. To show the funnel-shaped opening (/.) of the tubular portion of the nephridium into the vesicular internal portion (/. s. v.), and the relation of the latter to the body cavity (pseudoccele) of the leg (4. app.). Zeiss’s D, oc. 2. Reduced 3. Fic. 53,@ and 6. Longitudinal horizontal sections of two contiguous legs of an embryo of same stage as last. Reduced 3. OBSERVATIONS ON OCRIODRILUS LAOUUM. Boul Morphological and Biological Observations on Criodrilus lacuum, Hoffmeister.’ By Dr. L. Orley. Zoolog. Instit. University of Budapest. With Plate XXXVIII, figs. 1 to 8. In Vejdovsky’s very complete work, ‘System und Mor- phologie der Oligocheten,” Prag., 1884, which bears the character of a useful text-book on the morphology of the Oligocheta, I find only a scanty and incomplete account of the very interesting terricolous form, Criodrilus. On pages 16 and 58 he says: “ Lage der Hoden, Eierstécke, Samen- leiter und Samentaschen, sowie Gurtels unbekannt.” ‘ Leider weiss Man sehr wenig von dem Leben eines so merkwirdigen Oligocheeten.” I think that these assertions by this well- known investigator justify me in publishing my own observa- tions, incomplete though they are, relative to this worm. Criodrilus lacuum was discovered by the well-known German zoologist Fritz Miller, in 1844, in the so-called “Tegel-see,” near Berlin, and in the following year was de- scribed and figured by Hoffmeister.? It is almost incredible that fully thirty years should have elapsed since its discovery without its being found again. In 1876 this worm, found in a branch of the Danube near Linz, was again mentioned by 1 Translated from the MS. by Wm. B. Benham, B.Sc. 2 «Die bis jetzt bekannten Arten aus der Fam. der Regenwiirmer,’ Bruns- wick, 1845, p. 41. VOL, XXVII, PART 4,—NEW SER. QQ Soe DR. L. ORLEY. Hatschek! in his work, which furnishes contributions to the knowledge of the development and morphology of the Annelids. Two years later Hatschek® recognised this worm, described its development, and provided Vejdovsky with material for his researches.® Like Hatschek, I found Criodrilus in the neighbourhood of Buda-Pesth, and described it in a communication to the Hun- garian Academy of Science.* Recently it was found by Rosa’ in Italy, where it lives in the basin of the Po; somewhat earlier, too, it was noted by Panceri.® I have no doubt that it exists in other parts of Europe, and that only its habit of concealing itself has placed it amongst rare and hitherto little known Earthworms. The following description ought to lead to the discovery and to the better knowledge of it. Criodrilus lacuum. Hoffm. 1845. ‘ Die bis jetzt bekannten Arten d. Faun. d. Regenwiirmer.’ A mudworm 4—12 cm. in length, and about 5—10 mm. in breadth, of a dark brown or greenish colour dorsally, with lighter, sometimes reddish colouration ventrally, with rusty- yellow areole, and milk-white, horn-like spermatophores near the male genital pore. The body is quadrangular (though this is less noticeable ‘ *Sitzungsber. der Kais. Akad. d. Wiss. in Wien,’ Bd. 74, pp. 442—459. 2 “Studien z. Entwick. d. Anneliden,” ‘ Art. Zool. Inst. Wien,’ Bd. 1. * (a) ‘ Monograph. d. Enchytreiden,’ Prag., 1879. (4) “ Ueber der Entwick. des Herzens bei Criodrilus,” ‘Sitzungsb. k. béhm. ges. der Wiss..’ Prag., 1879. (¢) ‘System und Morphologie der Oligocheten,’ Prag., 1884. * (a) Amagyar. ‘ Oligochet. Fauna,’ Buda-Pesth, 1881. (4) ‘ Revisio et distributio specierum terricolarum regionis palarctice,’? Buda-Pesth, 1885. ® ** Nota sui Lombrici del Veneto,”’ ‘ Atti del R. Inst. Ven. di Sci. lett. ed. atti, b: 1¥aiS.evie ® “ Catalogo degli anellidi d’Italia,” ‘ Atti d. Soc. Ital. d. Sci. Nat.,’ 1875, xvii, p. 201. OBSERVATIONS ON CRIODRILUS LACUUM. 553 anteriorly), gradually narrowing posteriorly, and ending in a pointed, yellowish, and often regenerated tail. When the worm is contracted the dorsal surface is usually depressed. The number of somites is 200—250, or more. The somites are well defined, obscurely triannulated, and somewhat pressed together towards the tail. There is no dorsal pore. The last or anal somite is longer than those just in front. The anus itself is dorsal. There are rounded swellings on the somites Xe Sa, XU, ANG, XII. The prostomium is moderately elongate and as long as the buccal somite, from which it is distinctly separated, without having a prolongation dorsally or a furrow ventrally (Hoff- meister’s description—“ Die Lippe ist mit dem Mundseg- ment verwachsen”—is incorrect). The prostomial pore is indistinct. The four rows of sete extend along the corners of the body. The distance between the rows is nearly equal. The setz of each pair are somewhat apart; they are not prominent, and are slightly curved with rough ends. The genital organs are on the same plan as in the Lum- bricinee, and present no peculiarities. The seminal reservoirs, with their lateral czeca, extend through the somites 1x to x11. The true testes last for only a short period, during which they early break up into spermatogonia, so that I could recog- nise the two pairs, which lie in the somites x1 and xu, only by the remnants. The two pairs of ciliated rosettes have an obscure plate-like structure ; those of the first pair lie on the septum between the somites x and x1; those of the hinder pair on that between xi and x11, so that they project into the somites x1 and xi respectively. The sperm ducts are spirally coiled at the base of the rosettes, unite with one another at the level of the somites x11 and x11, and thence a wider, tortuous, common canal extends on each side to the external pore on the ventral surface of somite xv, between the two couples of sete. The termination is simple; without an atrium there is only a large gland (“vulva’”’ of Hoffmeister), which probably serves for the construction of the cocoon. There are two pairs of 554 DR. L. ORLEY. spermathece, which appear to open on the ventral surface between the somites 1x, x and x, x1 respectively. The ovaries lie in somite x11I, one on each side of the ventral blood-vessel, attached to the hinder face of the septum between the somites x11 and x111; they contain many ripe eggs, which are chiefly found at the free end of the ovary. I have not found a pointed prolongation at the distal end of the ovary. The oviducts lie opposite each ovary between the somites XIII and xiv; their plate-like funnels project into the former somite, and their very diminutive canal opens to the exterior on the ventral surface of somite xiv. I have not found separate yolk and cement glands. The horn-like spermatophores (Hoffmeister’s “ penis-formige Korpchen ”), 6 to 8 mm. in length, are found in the neighbour- hood of the male pore; their number is variable, and they are usually placed ventrally, although exceptionally they are to be met with on the dorsal surface. As a rule only two are situated on the neural side of somite x11, close to the ventral sete ; though very often they are some distance from them. They are always in pairs, from two to six in number ; only once have I found eight spermatophores, which were arranged irregularly round the male pore. These structures are products of copula- tion, and appear only during this operation ; whether they are formed in the sperm-duct, or by the swellings in front of the genital pore, I am unable to say with certainty. The spermato- phore, the shape of which is exactly rendered by fig. 7 (Pl. XXXVIII), consists of an homogeneous, hyaline, mucous sub- stance, in which are embedded numerous fine, enlongated fila- ments. The lumen is fairly wide and deep, open at the end, and filled with bundles of spermatozoa, which are massed together in a spiral fashion. The fibres in the wall can scarcely be the pro- duct of the epiderm cells; moreover, the spermatophores vary so much in number and position that one can scarcely admit that they are formed by the swellings. I think it more likely that they are formed in the spermathecz, there filled with sper- matozoa, and that they are then attached in position during mutual copulation. The broad basal portion clings fast to the OBSERVATIONS ON CRIODRILUS LACUUM. 55a cuticle, but never grows closely with it, so that the spermato- phore very easily falls away. That the great areola round the male pore and the swelling in front of it play an important part in copulation cannot be doubted, for, after the laying of the eggs, these structures immediately decrease in size. In speci- mens which I collected at the end of June I could find neither the swellings nor the areola, and in some even the male pore also had become indistinct. As to the time of sexual maturity of Criodrilus nothing positive is known. According to Vejdovsky the maturity seems to be attained in the months of June and July, since Hatschek found the cocoons with segmented eggs and embryos in the middle of June, whilst Hoffmeister mentions the worms furnished with ‘ pseudo-spermatophores ” at the beginning of July; Vejdovsky himself has not studied mature worms. My researches, however, extending over many years, show that the embryos escaping from the egg in summer may attain sexual maturity as early as February or March in the following year ; indeed, in the most favorable seasons copulation may even take place in these months. Copulation and egg laying take place almost certainly in June, since I have found at the beginning of July of this year no cocoons with embryos. The best sign of maturity are the large and very striking sperma- tophores, which are to be found regularly from March to the end of May, certainly not later. The embryos escape from the cocoons in May, June, and July; at the end. of the latter month I have collected only empty egg cases. At first the young worms are to be found amongst the thick roots of aquatic plants, only later in the mud, where they pass the winter and attain maturity. The clitellum, so very character- istic of the Lumbricinz, is, as Hoffmeister rightly insisted, absent. I have for many years collected these worms at all seasons, yet I have found no trace of a clitellum, nor of the so-called “ tubercula pubertatis ;” the great glandular areola of the male genital pore appears to replace the clitellum. The egg cases of the Lumbricine are known as roundish- oval chitinous capsules with pointed appendages, and are 556 DR. L. ORLEY. presumably secreted by the clitellum. The cocoons of the Criodrilidz, however, are spindle-shaped, parchment like struc- tures with a colour that changes; they are about 5 cm. in length, rapidly diminishing towards each end. One end, drawn out into strongly fibrous threads, serves for attachment to the roots, or more rarely to the leaves and branches of water plants; the other end truncated, with a dentate edge, allows the embryos to escape. As is the form, so also is the colour different. The perfectly newly laid cocoons are nearly transparent, horny yellow in colour, but after a time they become darker, and towards the time of hatching of the embryos they are blackish in colour. This change in colour, which reminds me of the egg cases of Shark embryos,' may here too be traced to chemical changes. The substance of the egg cases is not wholly chitinous ; at any rate a large portion is dissolved in caustic potash ; on the contrary, a sort of coagulated yolk and mucus take a large share in their constitution. The substance itself is very easily wetted, so that liquids and gases can diffuse through it. The inside is filled with a fluid albuminous substance, allied in density to white of egg; in this from eight to twenty eggs are embedded, and in it are found the remains of the sub- stance of the spermatophores as well as innumerable sperma- tozoa, which are to be met with especially round the develop- ing eggs; their appearance is reproduced in fig. 8, Pl. XXX VIII. The number of eggs is very variable; usually only one third of the fertilised eggs develop; the largest number of embryos in a cocoon was eight, the smallest two. The structure of these egg cases is especially well shown, if freshly laid eggs, preserved in alcohol, are placed in water in order that they may swell up. When such cocoons are care- fully examined the swollen part is found to be banded; these bands appear to correspond with the somites of the anterior part of the body. This correspondence, as well as the fibrous structure of the outermost layer (fig. 2) and the remains of the 1 LL. Orley, “Zur Physiol. der Haiembryonen,” ‘Termeszet. fiizetek,’ ix, 1885, Buda-Pesth. * OBSERVATIONS ON CRIODRILUS LACUUM. 557 spermatophores in the cocoon, allows one to suppose that the moulted skin of the anterior part of the body takes a share in the formation of the cocoon, just as in Lumbricine and Nephe- lide, the egg case probably owes its origin to the moulting of the clitellum. Since, however, the number of bands in this egg case exceeds twenty, it is probable that the somites lying behind the genital pores also take part in the formation of the cocoon.!' The tough secretion which builds up the chief portion of the cocoon, is probably furnished by the large swel- lings around and in front of the genital pores, and by the inner lining of the sperm duct. The process of formation of these egg cases, which alone would lead to positive results, I have unfortunately been unable to watch. Worms which I kept in my aquarium always hid themselves under cover of the roots of Sium latifolium, so that I was unable to overlook their operations. A transverse section through this cocoon shows three layers; an inner yellowish and homogeneous layer, an outer strongly fibrous, and a middle layer of interlaced strands (fig. 4). The fibrous layer is most easily seen at that end of the cocoon which is drawn out into threads (fig. 2), where they are col- lected together into strands and finally separate out into elastic fibres ; the latter serve for attachment to aquatic plants. Towards the swollen portion the fibrous layer becomes thinner at the expense of the middle layer. The middle layer (fig. 5) consists of innumerable interwoven bundles which are not separated into fibres. The network is densest below and becomes looser above. It looks so very much like a plant tissue, that a young botanist of this country at first disputed as to the substance of the tissue. Some thought it of vegetable origin. The lowermost or basal layer is made up of very many extremely delicate strata (fig. 6); these show a striated struc- ture, and contain here and there fibrous elements. This layer projects from the free end of the cocoon (fig. 3), is strongly folded, and serves to close the egg case. 1 See the following paper, in which the Clitellum is described. —TRANSLATOR. 558 DRG. ORLEY. The young are of a reddish colour, about 2—3 cm. in length, when they leave the cocoon. They escape from the free end of the egg case by the separation of the two “ lips,” which at first, owing to their elasticity, were closed. Hatschek supposes a Criodrilus to lay several cocoons, because the number of worms was very small in comparison with the cases which he found. I placed a Criodrilus amongst the roots of Sium latifolium, and in a few days found two quite transparent, and therefore fresh, cocoons. It appears to me, therefore, that a Criodrilus will lay two cocoons, in cor- respondence with the number of the sperm ducts. It is natural that more cocoons than worms should be found, since empty cocoons appear throughout the year attached amongst the roots; one sometimes finds old, black, very much frayed co- coons in certain places by thousands ; of freshly laid cocoons, on the contrary, I have never collected more than double the number relatively to the mature worms. Habits. — In isolated branches of large rivers, e.g. the Danube, as well as in flowing streams with muddy beds, there are places where the bottom is very nitrogenous owing to the decomposition of organic matter. In such places there are usually many aquatic plants with dense roots, which (at any rate here in Buda-Pesth, in the streams flowing into the Danube) are met with in great abundance. Amongst these plants I found a very large quantity of Sium latifolium, L., the favourite plant of Criodrilus. If these plants with their roots are taken out in the spring, and the “covert” carefully examined, one finds the long spindle-shaped cocoons and Criodrili engaged in egg-laying, so closely interlaced with the roots that they can only be separated with difficulty. The egg cases are at first sight so very like the Enteromorpha, that young botanists might dispute as to whether they are of vegetable or animal origin. It is only during the breeding season that the worms are to be found amongst the roots, where copulation and egg-laying takes place. After the completion of these operations they return to the mud, where their genital organs commence to OBSERVATIONS ON CRIODRILUS LACUUM. 559 degenerate. I have never been able to study the copulation, though I have looked at many worms. The swellings, around and in front of the male genital pore, are, however, so very swollen during the breeding season, and secrete so much mucus, that I presume the copulation takes place as in the Lumbri- cine. The worms found in the mud are very active, they burrow deep into the mud; I have even met them at a clay bottom, wherever the penetration of the water through the deeper layers renders their passage possible. In very shallow water, areas regularly and finely perforated are to be seen at the sides and bottom of the channel, which disclose their presence ; these perforated places can frequently be used as a guide to their discovery. They only live scattered over a terri- tory: as they can swim in a peculiar serpentine way they wander to different places, and settle where the necessaries of their life are present. Their food consists of rotting and decaying vegetable matter, which they swallow mixed with mud. ‘Their size varies according to their habitat and local circumstances, as the statements of other observers affirm. However, even under the same circumstances, very great differences in size exist, so that, I think, in the first place individuality, and in the second place environment must be considered as factors in their varying size. . In the economy of nature they appear to do good service by their destruction of organic matter ; their feces, as in the case of Earthworms in general, increases the goodness of the mud, as is proved by the settlement of many plants in the places where Criodrilus lives. The mud of such a bottom is very rich, and on the overflowing of the stream it will be carried over the fields where it is of further use for the nourishment of plants. In winter these worms burrow very deep in the mud, so that one can dig them out only from very great depths. Their tenacity of life is great, yet after this season they are very much changed. In winter they soon perish in tanks with pure water, but in autumn they can be kept for aweek. In the tanks they twine themselves into a knot and are then very difficult to separate. Their power of regeneration is astonishing. A 560 DR. L. ORLEY. worm, cut through the middle, forms a new tail with shortened somites. In autumn more worms with regenerated tails are found than in the spring. Once I found, in October, out of fifty specimens, thirty with regenerated tails. The tail is very brittle, and the reason is very likely to be found in the irregular arrangement of the muscle-bundles. In company with Criodrilus there lives a very interesting Earthworm, Allolobophora dubiosa, Orley, which has nearly the same habits. Amongst the Hirudinea, species of Aulostoma and Nephelis are their greatest enemies ; these swallow three or four Criodrili at a time. [For the explanation of figures 1 to 8, Plate XXXVIII, illustrating Dr. Orley’s paper, see p. 570.] STUDIES ON BARTHWORMS, 561 Studies on Earthworms. No. III. Criodrilus lacuum, Hoffmeister. By William Blaxland Benham, B.Sc., Demonstrator in the Zoological Laboratory of University College, London. With Plate XXXVIII, figs. 9 to 19. Tnanxs to the kindness of Dr. Orley, who, at Professor Ray Lankester’s request, sent him a bottle containing a large number of Criodrilus preserved in spirit, and including both sexually mature and young specimens, as well as cocoons, I[ have been enabled to make a study of this interesting worm. The specimens are all in a good state of preservation, and I have been able to add several new facts concerning its anatomy. This is the first time that figures illustrating the general anatomy of Criodrilus have been published. Hoffmeister! gives a coloured figure of the worm, and of the cocoon, showing their natural size and appearance, but with no details as to sete, pores, &c.; Vejdovsky* has already published excellent figures of various portions or organs of the worm; e.g. the ovary, nephridial funnel, sete, transverse section of the body, so that I have not repeated these. Dr. Orley? added drawings of the prostomium, as well as of that of another worm which he described as Criodrilus dubiosus; but in his paper, published in the present number of this Journal, he makes no 1 © Die bis jetzt bekannt. Art. aus d. Fam.d. Regenwiirmer,’ Brunswick, 1845. 2 «Systeme und Morph. d. Oligocheten,’ Prag., 1884. 3 * Mathemat.u.Termeszt.tudomanyi K6zlemenyek,’ Budapest, Bd. 16, 1881. 562 WILLIAM BLAXLAND BENHAM. reference to this worm. He, however, mentions Allolobo- phora dubiosa as occurring with C. tacuum, so that, pre- sumably, they are one and the same animal. But with all these figures no general view of the worm has been given. My thanks are due to Professor Ray Lankester, not only for these worms, but also for allowing me to translate Dr. Orley’s paper, so that I could corroborate or comment on his observa- tions, and fill in details which he has left untouched. I am quite aware that a great deal more still remains to be done in reference to the anatomy and histology of Criodrilus, but I think the following, taken with the description of the previous observers, forms a fairly complete account of its anatomy. External Characters.—I have nothing to add to Orley’s statements as to the length and number of somites of the worm ; my specimens are all preserved in strong spirit, and are there- fore greatly contracted ; they are much coiled and twisted and had to be soaked in weak alcohol before they could be con- veniently dissected. A deep groove traverses the dorsal surface posterior to somite 1; the ventral surface is rounded, and the sides are more or less vertical (Pl. XX XVIII, fig. 12). The prostomium is distinct, and its terminal pore has been figured by Vejdovsky (loc. cit., pl. xin, fig. 12). The anterior somites are longer than the posterior ones, and are not so prominently quadrangular in section. On the ventral surface of somites 1X, X, XI, XII, and x11, there are prominent rounded papilla, in which the ventral sete are inserted. The structure of the epidermis is to a certain extent figured by Vejdovsky (loc. cit., pl. xiv, fig. 3). It consists of narrow columnar cells with oval nuclei; their inner ends seem to diverge and between them are seen small rounded cells with rounded nuclei (Pl. XXXVIII, fig. 17, c.), which Vejdovsky considers as young epiderm cells. Goblet cells are very rare; they are narrow cells filled with granular matter, with the protoplasm and nucleus at the imner ends. As the worm lives in water the necessity for secreting mucus would not be so great as in Harthworms, properly so-called, and hence the mucous cells are few and far between. The capillary loops of STUDIES ON EARTHWORMS. 563 the blood-vessels pass between the cells of the epidermis (fig. 17, d), as in the Leech, and as Beddard has shown to be the case in Perionyx and in Pericheta. The longitudinal muscles are arranged irregularly, as in Microcheta, Allolobophora, and others. Connective tissue is abundant, and forms a fairly thick layer between the muscular layer and the coelomic epithelium. Previous writers have denied the existence of a clitellum ; even Orley, who expressly looked for it, says that he has found no trace of it; yet in all my specimens, which are sexually mature, a considerable difference in appearance is noticeable behind somite xv, and extending to about somite xtvi1. The worm is here nearly cylindrical, though slightly concave on the ventral surface, where the intersegmental grooves are not dis~ tinctly marked, but tend to run into one another across the middle line as shown in fig. 10. The colour, at any rate in spirit specimens, is rather darker over the dorsal and lateral surfaces of this region than elsewhere. Noticing this, I cut a series of transverse sections through the body, and I then found that behind the somite xv the epidermis gradually changed its character. In addition to the columnar cells forming the epidermis of the general surface, a layer of elongated, club-shaped cells, of various lengths, is present (fig. 18, c), so that the epidermis is here some four or five times deeper than elsewhere, and deeper at the sides than on the dorsal surface. These cells have avery similar appearance to those in the clitellum of Lumbricus aud Microcheta, though they differ slightly in detail. Each cell is filled with numerous highly refracting, small spherical globules, and the protoplasm with the nucleus is confined, apparently, to the inner, swollen end of the cell. As the cells vary in length, the appearance presented is that of three or four layers of such cells, as in Lumbricus; but in the latter worm these club-shaped cells contain a granular substance, and the rounded, refracting globules are confined to narrow, elongated cells, intermediate in length between the club- shaped and columnar cells and which are absent in Criodrilus, 564 WILLIAM BLAXLAND BENHAM. Another point of difference is presented in the absence of the strands of connective tissue, which in Lumbricus separate the club-shaped cells into more or less distinct groups. I think that there can be no doubt that the clitellum is present; but as it commences and ends gradually, and since, from Orley’s remarks and from Hoffmeister’s drawing, there is no difference in colour in the living worm, it may easily be overlooked in this condition. The anus is situated quite dorsally (fig. 11), on an enlarged somite, which Vejdovsky considers as representing some seven or eight fused somites, as indicated by the ganglionic swellings figured in pl. x, fig. 21, of his work. The pore of the sperm-duct is placed on a large hemispherical papilla, or swelling, on somite xv, between the ventral and dorsal sete. which Orley speaks of as “ der Hof,” and which I have translated as “areola.” It is, in the sexually mature worm, very conspicuous, and has caused, in spirit specimens, the lateral swelling shown in Pl. XX XVIII, figs. 9, 10. The pore of the oviduct is similarly placed in somite xiv, but on a much less prominent papilla. Both these pores are visible from the side (fig. 13); and near them are usually one or more white spermatophores. These are fully described in the preceding paper, but whereas Orley states that they are generally fixed close to the ventral setz, the specimens exa- mined by me show them nearer the dorsal sete ; at the same time I do not intend by this, nor by my figure, that it should be inferred that Orley is in error: he has had much greater opportunity for observation than I have, and my figure was drawn some weeks before I saw his paper. I have been unable to see the nephridia pores, and there are no dorsal pores. The four couples of setz are set at the corners of the animal, as shown in fig. 11, and are perfectly evident throughout the body, including the clitellum. They are usually broken off short, so that I was unable to extract them; but in sections they are seen to have the ordinary shape (Vejdovsky, pl. xiii, fig. 13). Internal anatomy.—The alimentary tract differs from STUDIES ON EARTHWORMS. 565 that of other earth-worms, with the exception of Pontodri- lus, in the absence of a gizzard. The pharynx extends to the hinder boundary of somite 1v (fig. 14), the walls are very muscular, and the usual radiating muscles pass to the body wall, some going as far back as somite vi. In transverse sections I found numerous glandular-looking cells amongst the muscles of the dorsal and lateral wall, but I was unable to find any duct leading to the lumen of the pharynx. There are similar groups of cells in the anterior somites, through which the cesophagus passes ; these lie on each side of the subintestinal blood-vessel, but I could find no duct. The cesophagus is a narrow, simple tube, the walls of which are fairly thick and very vascular. In somite x11 the ceso- phagus enlarges, and in somites x1v to xvi the diameter is some three or four times greater than in front. This “crop” has a whiter appearance, due to its thicker muscular walls, than the rest of the cesophagus; it is deeply constricted as it passes through the septa, and the wall is greatly folded in- ternally. I almost expected to find that this was a gizzard, but the structure is quite the same as that of the cesophagus. In the nineteenth somite the crop narrows and becomes the intestine, the walls of which are fairly thin, so that the dark food-material is seen through. Vejdovsky states that there is no typhlosole, but on slitting open the intestine along one side, and examining its interior, a moderate-sized typhlosole is seen on the dorsal wall. Series of sections confirmed this observation, and showed that the epithelium covering this in-pushed dorsal wall differs somewhat from the rest of the lining in that the cells are here longer and more regular in size. The typhlosole then is present, and init a small typhlosolar vessel or irregular blood space, into which vessels from the intestine wall enter, and from which small vessels pass vertically into the dorsal blood trunk, just as is the case with Lumbricus. How far back the typhlosole extends I am unable to say. ' Perrier, “ Etudes sur l’organisation des Lomb. terrestres,” ‘ Arch. de Zool. Exper. et Gen.,’ ix, 1881. 566 WILLIAM BLAXLAND BENHAM. The absence ofa gizzard, bothin Criodrilus and in Ponto- drilus, is probably related to the soft nature of their food- material. Both are aquatic in habit. Pontodrilus, as Perrier tells us, lives on the seashore, and its food consists of decaying vegetable matter thrown up by the sea. Criodrilus lives entirely in the water, and obtains its food, according to Orley, by swallowing the mud which contains decomposing vegetable matter. In both cases the food is soft, and already more or less finely divided, and can be easily digested, so that the necessity for a gizzard does not exist: in Lumbricus and other worms, however, which live on land and burrow and swallow the hard soil, some crushing apparatus is needed before the digestive fluid secreted by the wall of the intestine can act on the food. The vascular system I have not traced to any extent. The dorsal blood-trunk is large, and has the usual ampullate appearance up to somite xv. In the next preceding somite it is bent slightly to one side, and gradually gets narrower till it divides up on the wall of the pharynx. In each of the somites vil to x1 a pair of large and long moniliform hearts unite the dorsal to the ventral trunk; and there are lateral vessels in each of the somites posterior to the hearts. In the neighbourhood of the anus the dorsal trunk divides into two (Vejdovsky; pl. xiv). A subneural vessel is present and a typhlosolar vessel, but neither latero-neural nor intes- tino-tegumentary vessels exist. The nervous system presents no points of difference from the usual arrangement. The three “ great fibres” are present. The nephridia are not present in front of somite x11. A series of sections confirmed the results derived from dissection. In and behind this somite they are large and fairly conspicuous organs, having a slight muscular vesi- cular portion. Vejdovsky states that they open exteriorly in front of the ventral sete: he also figures a nephridial funnel (pl. xiii, 21), which somewhat resembles that of Lumbricus. Pontodrilus agrees with Criodrilus in that there are no STUDIES ON EARTHWORMS. 567 nephridia in the anterior somites, the first nephridium being apparently in somite x1v, so that both these approach the Limicole in having no nephridia in those somites in which the spermathecze and ciliated rosettes lie, though they are present in the same somites with the oviduct and the posterior part of the sperm-duct. The Genital Organs.—I have succeeded in finding all the usual organs connected with the genital apparatus, with the exception of spermathece. The seminal reservoirs or sperm sacs are constructed on the plan of Allolobophora, and not on that of Lumbricus, as Orley seems to indicate, since there is no median portion connecting the sacs below the intestine (fig. 15). The worms which I dissected are sexually mature, one of them having spermatophores attached to somite XIV. There are four pairs of pouches, as in Allolobophora,' one on each side of each of the somites 1x, x, x1, and x11; they vary in size in these somites, and in different individuals. Each is an irregular loose mass, which is easily torn on opening the worm, and in sections the lobation is seen to be carried to a great extent, the cavity of the sac being subdivided by long, narrow inpushings of the wall of the sac, whilst loose separate masses of developing spermatozoa are seen in the somites in which the reservoirs lie. Those in somites 1x and x are formed as anteriorly directed saclike outpushings of the hinder septa of these somites, whilst those in somites x1 and x1I are pos- terior outgrowths of the anterior septa of these somites. Hach is connected to a septum by a short pedicle (Pl. XX XVIII, fig. 15, e! to e*). The testes (which Orley states lie in somites x1 and x11) are in reality in somites x and x1, attached to the anterior septa, very close to the ventral body wall, near the nerve cord (fig. 15, a). They have a digitate form, like the testis of A llolobophora turgida, figured by Bergh.’ (Pl. XXX VIII, fig. 16). Owing to their deep position they are very difficult to 1 R.S. Bergh, “ Untersuch. iiberd. Bau u.d. Entwickl. d. Geschlectsorgane d. Regenwiirmer,” ‘Zeit. fiir wiss, Zool.,’ 1886, p, 303. 2 Thid., fig. 1. VOL, XXVII, PART 4,——NEW SER. RR 568 WILLIAM BLAXLAND BENHAM. find at first, but my dissections are confirmed by transverse sections. Close behind each testis is a ciliated rosette, lying, therefore, in somites x and x1, and close to the posterior septum of the somite. (Orley wrongly states that they are attached to the anterior septum of somites x1 and x11, into which they project.) The sperm-ducts from the two ciliated rosettes of one side unite at the level of the septum behind somite x1, and the single duct passes to somite xv, embedded in the connective tissue which exists between the coelomic epithelium and the longitudinal muscles of the body wall; hence it is practically impossible to trace it except by means of sections, unless it happen to be filled with spermatozoa, when it will appear whiter than the surrounding tissue. In somite xv is a large and conspicuous hemispherical gland, which may be called a prostate; the sperm-duct passes to the dorsal surface of this gland, dips down through its mass and opens to the exterior by the pore mentioned above, which is situated on a prominent rounded papilla, which seems to be merely the outer half of the prostate. This gland itself consists of cells similar to those forming the epidermis of the clitellum, and quite con- tinuous with them; the muscular layers of the body wall are here thin, and pass over the inner surface of the prostate, so that the gland appears to be formed merely by an hemispherical thickening of the epidermis over this area. The ovary is a flattened rounded disc attached to the anterior septum of somite x111, close to the nerve cord (fig. 15, f). It resembles the ovary of Perichzta in shape, and is without the tail-like prolongation of the ovary of Lumbricus (fig. 19). It is figured in Vejdovsky’s work,! but I have added a figure here, as he does not show the delicate membrane sur- rounding the organ. The ovisac (which seems to be a better name than Bergh’s “receptaculum ovorum,” since the word “ receptaculum ” has been applied to a spermatheca) is a botryoidal sac-like 1 Loc. cit.; pl. xiii, fig. 23. STUDIES ON EARTHWORMS. 569 protrusion of the posterior septum of somite x11, and thus hes in somite x1v. It is filled with ripe ova and has a goodly supply of blood capillaries on its wall. It is very conspicuous in the specimens dissected by me, much more so than the ovary, for which I should probably have mistaken it had not Bergh’s paper appeared ;! and it is curious that Orley makes 10 mention of it. The funnel of the oviduct (fig. 15, g) projects into somite xu, close to the point where the ovisac is attached; and the edge of the funnel is more prominent than is usual. The external pore has already been mentioned, as being on somite xiv (fig. 10, c). Orley states that the spermathece “appear to open to the exterior between the somites 1x and x, and x and x1.” I can find no trace of spermathecze, though I have searched for them in some half a dozen specimens, of various stages of maturity ; nor is any trace of them presented in a series of sections through this region of the body. I must therefore conclude that this is an error of observation on his part; he says no more of them than the above quotation. Can he have mis- taken the ciliated rosettes for these organs, and mistaken the testes for the rosettes? It seems to me quite probable from his description of the relation of these structures that such is the case ; a portion of a ciliated rosette, removed, teased, and examined, would show mature spermatozoa, which might lead an observer to conclude that he was dealing with a sperma- theca. Again, the shape of the testes, as seen with a lens, might without difficulty be mistaken for ciliated rosettes, which he places in the position occupied by the testes, though he has placed these in the wrong somites. The cocoon and spermatophore are so fully described and figured by Orley, that I have nothing to add to his description of these structures. His interesting observations on the habits of Criodrilus ‘ It is probable, as Mr. Beddard has remarked in a recent number of the ‘Proc. Zool. Soc.,’ that the structure figured and described by me as the ovary of Microcheta (see this Journal, vols. xxvi and xxvii) is really the ‘‘ ovisac ;” and that I have overlooked the true gonad. 570 WILLIAM BLAXLAND BENHAM. will, I hope, enable this form to be discovered in England and similar observations on the habits of other forms are a great desideratum. Parasites of Criodrilus.——My attention was first at- tracted to certain curious elongated structures attached to the ovary, and I found them afterwards in various parts of the body. These are narrow bodies, about one tenth of an inch in length, and of a white colour (in spirit). Each is invested by a well-defined cuticle, which encloses a very granular dark medullary protoplasm, in which is a clearer space, probably the nucleus. The shape varies to a great extent ; some consist of an elongated ovoid body drawn out at each end into a much narrower portion ; others are just the reverse, consisting of two ovoid swellings connected by a narrower portion. They are apparently Gregarine, which have been killed in various states of englenoid movement, such as is exhibited by Monocystis lumbrici; the worms had been killed in cor- rosive sublimate, judging from the white deposit on their surface, and this would cause the various states of movement to be fixed. At one end the cuticle is thickened and presents somewhat the appearance figured by Professor Lankester in vol. 3 of this Journal, Pl. VII, for M. aphrodite. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXXVIII, Illustrating Dr. Orley’s Paper “ Observations on Criodrilus lacuum,” figs. 1 to 8, and Mr. Benham’s Paper “ Studies on Karthworms,” figs. 9 to 19. Criodrilus lacuum, Hoffmeister. Fic. 1.—Cocoon of Criodrilus lacuum. Natural size. a. The end by which it is attached. 4%. The free end. Fie. 2.—The attachable end more highly magnified. (x 300.) STUDIES ON BARTHWORMS. EL Fie. 3.—The free end more highly magnified. (x 300.) Fic. 4.—A transverse section through the middle portion of the wall of the cocoon. (xX 300.) a. Outer layer. 4. Middle layer. c. Inner layer. Fic. 5.—A detached piece of the middle layer. (x 800.) Fic, 6.—Strata of the inner layer. (x 300.) Fie. 7.—A spermatophore. (x 60.) Fic. 8.—Spermatozoa from the spermatophore. (x 500.) Fic. 9.—The anterior extremity of the worm viewed from above. (x 2, spirit specimen.) a. The prostomium. 4, The dorsal sete. c. Enlargement occupying somites xIv to xvitl, due to the large papille on the ventral sur- face. d. The clitellum., Behind somite xiv the quadrangular shape of the worm is shown. Fic. 10.—The same worm from below. a. The prostomium. 4%. The mouth. c¢. The pore of the oviduct. d. The pore of the sperm-duct, situated on a large rounded swelling causing the enlargement in this region. e. The ventral sete. /. The clitellum. Fic. 11.—The last few somites of the body, showing :—a. The anus, situated dorsally. 4. The region regarded by Vejdovsky as representing seven or eight fused somites. Fie. 12.—A diagrammatic outline of a section through the body in the posterior region of the body, showing its quadrangular shape, with the dorsal sete (a) and the ventral sete (4) placed at the corners. Fic. 18.—The side of the body, showing a spermatophore (a) attached to somite xIv. 4. dorsal sete. c. The ventral sete. d. The sperm-pore, on its enlarged papilla. e. The ovipore. Fie. 14.—General view of the anatomy of Criodrilus when opened in the usual way. (x 2.) a@. The pharynx. 4. The esophagus, swelling out at c to form a strong muscular crop. d. The intestine. e. The dorsal blood- vessel. ff. The lateral hearts. gy. g. The seminal reservoirs. /. The ovary. &. The ovisac (Bergh’s “receptaculum ovorum”). 7. The hemispherical glandular swelling or prostate around the terminal portion of the sperm-duct. m. Prostomium, 2. Suprapharyngeal ganglia. o. The nephridia. Fic. 15.—The genital organs of the left side greatly enlarged. A portion of the oesophagus is represented on the right of the figure. a@.a'. The two testes. 4, d’. The ciliated rosettes. c. The sperm-duct, which dips into the hemispherical prostate, d. The seminal reservoirs, ¢!, ¢°, ¢3, e4, are represented as relatively rather smaller than their true size; they are seen to be attached to the various septa. /. The ovary. The septum between the somites x11 and X1v is turned back so as to show the funnel of the oviduct, gy, and the nephri- dial funnel, 7. 4. The ovisac. 4%. Nephridium. Fic. 16.—A testis attached to the septum. bye STUDIES ON EARTHWORMS. Fic. 17.—A small portion of a section through the epidermis, to show a capillary loop, d, passing between the columnar cells, 2, and the small cells, c. a. The cuticle. e. The circular muscles. . Fic. 18.—A portion of the epidermis from somite xvIII, in order to show its clitellar structure. a. Cuticle. 6. Columnar epithelialcells. c. Hlongated club-shaped clitellar cells. d. Circular muscles. Fic. 19.—An ovary. NOTES ON THE CHROMATOLOGY OF ANTHEA CEREUS. 573 Notes on the Chromatology of Anthea cereus. By Cc. A. Mae Munn, M.A., M.D. With Plates XXXIX and XL. Tue colouring matters of Anthea cereus were first examined by Sorby,! who found several present in this Actinia. Among others he found chlorofucin, the bands of which had been observed by Mr. Charles Horner, and the position of which led Mr. Horner to think that the supposed chlorophyll was different to that of land plants. Sorby had previously found chlorofucin in fresh-water algze and sub- sequently in Fucus and other olive marine alge; and in his paper on “ Comparative Vegetable Chromatology” he gave directions for its separation from other pigments. Prof. Lankester, in the list of chlorophyll-containing animals in the English edition of Sachs’s ‘ Botany,’ includes Anthea cereus and puts “chlorofucin” after it, thus accepting Sorby’s statements. Among those animals which have been proved to contain symbiotic unicellular alge Anthea is now, I believe, included ;* and it becomes of interest to find out whether chlorofucin is due to the presence of these symbiotic algze or whether it is a pigment belonging intrinsically to the animal; whether, also, the other colouring matters associated with the chlorofucin 1 «Proc. Roy. Soc.,”? No. 146, vol. xxi, 1873, p. 454. 2 Hertwig, O. and R., “ Die Actinien,” ‘ Jena’ische Zeitschrift. f. Naturwis.,’ Bad. xiii, 1879, S. 495—500; and Geddes, ‘ Proc. Roy. Soc. Hdin.,’ vol. xi, 188]—1882. 574 Cc. A. MAC MUNN. belong to the animai or the alge. I have already! proved this point almost completely, as I found that in Anthea cereus, in Bunodes Ballii, and Sagartia Bellis, “yellow cells,” or symbiotic alge, are present, that these animals all contain chlorofucin, all contain the same accompanying colouring matters, and that these colouring matters are evidently due to the “yellow cells” with which the tentacles are stuffed ; for there is no essential difference in the spectra of the solutions of the tentacles in which the colouring matters are derived entirely from the “ yellow cells ” and those obtainable from other parts of the Actinia. Moreover, I have also proved that in anemones possessing yellow cells there is more or less suppression of the respiratory proteids found in other Actiniz. But I had not repeated Sorby’s experiments in which he applied Stokes’s “ fractional” method for the separation of the chlorofucin from the other colouring matters. In the present paper I have given the results of this examination, and, as will be seen, the statements of Sorby have been verified. This is of importance, as Krukenberg? has omitted to mention in the account of his experiments the results arrived -at by Sorby, although, as I shall show, he had evidently chlorofucin before him in some of the solutions whose spectra he has mapped. In the paper referred to above’ I haveshown that the mixture of colouring matters obtained from the Actiniz therein mentioned contain chlorofucin, and that the bands of this correspond to the chlorofucin bands in a similar solution of Fucus serratus. Sorby has figured in a diagram the bands of this pigment, but he does not give their wave-length measurements, and only figures the dominant bands of “ blue” and “ yellow chlorophyll” in the same diagram for the sake of comparison ; consequently some confusion is caused when one endeavours to find out what 1 6 Ae had arr Mel oes 7 71 RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 605 The Relation of the Nemertea to the Vertebrata. By A. A. W. Hubrecht, Professor in Utrecht. With Plate XLII.! In venturing at the close of my Report on the Nemertea, collected by H.M.S. “Challenger,” to leave the region of demonstrated facts and actual observations, and to enter upon that of speculation and suggestion, I gladly availed myself of the permission for so doing granted to me by the editor, Mr. John Murray. I thought it necessary to ask for that permis- sion, because general speculations on the ancestry of the Chordata hardly appeared to me to fit into the framework of those Reports. My desire in this case to deviate from a rule which I held to be salutary, was due to the fact that of late these speculations have been conducted along very varying channels, an entirely new one having only very lately been opened by Bateson’s important series of papers on Balano- glossus. An attempt to give more depth to one of these channels, and thus to lead into it the attention of a greater number of my fellow-workers, especially commended itself to me, since it was my conviction that the lines laid down by myself in former publications derived considerable support from the “ Challenger ” material, and were thus entitled to a renewed and full consideration. 1 Published by permission of the editor of the ‘Zoology of the Challenger Expedition,’ Mr. John Murray, F.R.S.. 606 A, A. W. HUBRECHT. I would formulate the proposition, to the further develop- ment of which this memoir is to be devoted, as follows: More than any other class of invertebrate animals, the Nemertea have preserved in their organisation traces of such features as must have been character- istic of those animal forms, by which a transition has been gradually brought about from the archi- celous Diploblastic (Celenterate) type to those enterocelous Triploblastica, that have afterwards developed into the Chordata (Urochorda, Hemi- chorda, Cephalochorda, and Vertebrata). It will be seen that this statement excludes the idea of any direct ancestral relations between Nemertea and Chordata. If any such relation were proposed, it might with good reason be asked—considering the very extensive variation which is met with amongst Nemertea—which species or which genus was more particularly pointed to. The question in itself con- demns the proposition which leads to it. It will, moreover, be seen that this statement accepts the. outcome of Bateson’s researches and speculations, in so far as the points of agreement between Balanoglossus and Am- phioxus are fully recognised. A provisional link between these two, and an arrangement of Balanoglossus as amongst the Chordata, appears to be quite as justifiable as the elevation of the Urochorda to their new dignity in zoological classifi- cation. There is, however, a great difference between looking at Balanoglossus as a low type amongst the Chordata (in which I fully agree with Bateson) and rejecting the signifi- cance of the Nemertean type as one of transition in the way above indicated. There is no doubt that the Nemertea represent a more primi- tive phase than the Enteropneusta (Hemichorda). They have no gill-slits ; but their nervous system shows certain unexpected analogies with that of the higher Chordata of more intrinsic value than those that obtain between Balanoglossus and the Chordata in general. Also for the important question, RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 607 which is so vital in any consideration of the ancestry of the Vertebrates, viz. the origin of metameric segmentation, it appears to me that the Nemertea offer points very worthy of consideration. The question of the proboscis and its sheath, as comparable to hypophysis and notochord was fully treated by me in another paper,! and will here only be very briefly touched upon. In my opinion, this comparison is all the more forced upon us, now that in other respects (nervous system, &c.) new evidence of genetic relationship is here brought forward. The first point I wish to consider is that of metameric seg- mentation. It has been specially treated of late years by various authors of renown, with whom I do not wish to enter at this moment into any lengthy controversy, but will briefly state what may be gathered for the theory in general, from a careful consideration of the incipient metamery of the Nemertea. If we start from a more or less radiate ancestor of the earliest diploblastic type, in which neither a radial nor a serial repetition of organs or organ systems has yet come about, and which may indifferently be considered to resemble either a more flattened Trichoplax or a more spherical gastrula, we may assume that in the course of the development of other internal organs (towards the formation of which the secondary accumulation of cells between the two primary layers often so largely contributes) the radial symmetry may either be further accentuated or may be replaced by a tendency towards bilateral symmetry. In the latter case we are inclined to ascribe the first impulse towards this bilateral symmetry to a preference, which slowly establishes itself in the animal mechanism, for moving in one direction rather than in any other, i.e. for generally stretching forward, when moving about, one particular portion of the body. One impulse of this sort will suffice to lead us to understand, or rather to deduce, a very considerable number of conse- quences, which cannot fail to make their appearance under the 1 “On the Ancestral Forms of the Chordata,” ‘ Quart. Journ. Micr, Sci.,’ vol, xxiii, 1883. 608 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. influence of natural selection acting upon the organisms that have inherited this tendency in different degrees. Thus we may understand the narrowing and lengthening of an animal that moves in one direction in preference to any other; and similarly the development in the nervous system of a centrali- sation not far away from the anterior extremity. All this has already been stated by Balfour in clearer terms in his ‘ Comparative Embryology’ (vol. ii, pp. 808, 311), where he describes the gradual steps by which a radiate medusa-like animal may have passed into a bilateral worm-like form, with two longitudinal nerve-stems, which are regarded by Balfour as the stretched nerve-ring of the Medusa. I fully endorse these views ; only, with respect to the nervous system, I hold it to be safer to leave out of comparison the already specialised nerve-ring of the Medusa, and rather to go back to the Coelenterate nervous system as primitive as that of the Actinia, where the plexus, both of the epiblast and the hypoblast, with an increase in density in the region of the mouth and the tentacles, may be said to be the fair representa- tive of one of the lowest starting points. In this the plexiform arrangement predominates. Now we find in all the lower invertebrates various though distinct nerve tracts that are being specialised in this plexiform nerve-tissue according to the modes of motion of the animal, and according to the general shape of the body. Thus in the Meduse, which move about in the water by annular contractions of the lower portion of the bell-shaped body, one of the nerve-rings already alluded to was demon- strated by the Hertwigs to innervate the musculature by which this is brought about. In the Ctenophora the nerve system is less satisfactorily known, but still Lang! does not hesitate to bring them into genetic relationship with the Polyclada. Among the latter, Gunda, with its two longitudinal lateral stems, may be looked upon as an extreme term in this series. 1 A. Lang, ‘Monographie der Polycladen,’ Leipzig, 1884. RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 609 Another series may indeed be supposed to have derived longitudinal stems from a ring which became extended to form lateral cords, as the animal passed from the radial to the bilateral symmetry, in the way suggested by Balfour. Still, even in this case, a nerve-plexus may be expected to be coex- istent with or to have preceded the nerve-ring. The longitu- dinal stems originating from the anterior thickenings of the plexus that innervate the sense organs and the tip of the head (specially sensitive in connection with the forwardly directed movements of the body), would all the more probably be pre- served and increase in development, as during this forward movement they form a right and a left centre for the reception of outward stimuli. In the same way those of the radially arranged stems of the Polyclada that are parallel to the longi- tudinal body-axis, and mark out right and left, are more strongly developed than the others, presumably on account of their importance in connection with the well-directed move- ments of the body in response to external agents. In the ancestral Mollusca I think we may assume with great probability the presence of four longitudinal stems —two latero-dorsal and two latero-ventral ones; in the ances- tral forms of Annelids and Arthropods two, which have gra- dually coalesced ventrally, as was first suggested by Gegenbaur. Again, in Nematodes differently situated longitudinal stems in what was originally a uniform plexus are preserved ; whereas in ancestral Nemertea two lateral longitudinal trunks in the plexus were undoubtedly characteristic features. That one medio-dorsal stem in this plexus, in which all the impressions made by outward agencies on both halves of the body might be concentrated, and from whence the correspond- ing movements might be regulated, will more fully answer the purpose than two lateral stems, however they may be united by an intervening plexus, is a priori probable, and would explain the first impulse towards the formation of such a longitudinal concentration in the uniform plexus. And when once such a dorso-median stem is present, in addition to two lateral ones, a struggle for supremacy, presided 610 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. over by natural selection, may lead to a diminution of the lateral stems, and to an increase of the dorso-median one. This, in my opinion, as will be more fully developed below, was the case in the ancestors of the Chordata, traces of this struggle and of the competing structural elements being duly preserved. If we suppose the bilateral symmetry to be established in one of the lower representatives of the Metazoa, and the type to goon increasing in length in the course of generations, then this increase indeed exposes it to very different and per- haps more numerous dangers and enemies than would threaten it were the same bulk concentrated in a spherical or . radial circumference. And if, even in the latter case, injuries to the individual might prove fatal were it not provided with strong powers of regeneration (cf. Star-fishes, Ophiurids, Crinoids, &c.), still it needs no comment that, when bilateral symmetry and increase in length so considerably enlarges the surface which is open to attacks, and so enormously facilitates the rupture of the individual, or the severing of parts by rapa- cious enemies preying upon it, similar regenerative powers are none the less required to insure the persistence of the type. These dangers, continually threatening the exist- ence of the individuals, and thus injurious to the species, counteracted as they are by regenerative pro- cesses (power of reproduction of lost parts), I hold to be at the base of all those cases of metamery in the animal kingdom which do not fall under the head of strobilation, the latter being comparatively rare with respect to the former. Incipient metamery, once established by this cause, may further differentiate in the most diverse directions (heteronomous segmentation, &c.), even after the absolute cessation of the causes that in the first instance have provoked it. The explanation has, moreover, the advantage of being applicable to radial as well as to serial metamery. These propositions must now be more fully developed. The RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 611 power of reproduction of lost parts comes, without doubt, under the general laws of formation and growth. We find it even in the lowest Protozoa. If the material which heredity has accumulated, either in such a unicellular being or in the egg of a Metazoon, and out of which the elements of the different organ systems will gradually develop, is hereditarily so disposed that a compensation for the loss of important parts is facili- tated, this will, of course, constitute an advantage. Such a compensation may, e.g. be obtained where the generative products are developed in very many separate centra, and not in one closed sac. Injury to the latter will, ceteris paribus, be more fatal than an equivalent injury destroying one or more of the former. The same holds good for diffused instead of concentrated nervous centra, for the case of liver saccules to the intestine, instead of one compact liver, for numerous aper- tures and deferent ducts to the nephridial system instead of one, &c. And all! this is still more evident when we have before us a long, bilaterally symmetrical animal, which is easily snapped in two. In this case it must be of pre-eminent impor- tance, that the remaining halves, which may in their turn be severed by the same cause into smaller parts, should possess sufficient power of reproduction to repair the damage. Now, it cannot be doubted that an equal distribution of the important components of the organism (nervous centra, generative organs, nephridia, intestinal appendages, &c.) throughout the whole length of the animal meets this requirement. Any severed portion will then be provided with these more important parts, and will be more or less adapted for a separate and individual existence. The formation of a new mouth and of new brain-lobes in a fragment of this description remains, of course, quite as won- derful and inexplicable as before, but still we cannot fail to see that such an arrangement as here indicated must somehow be beneficial to the species, and that we need not stop short with Bateson,’ when he says that “the repetition of various struc- 1 Bateson, “ The Ancestry of the Chordata,” ‘ Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xxvi, pp. 545, 546, 1886, 612 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. tures is one of the chief factors in the composition of animal forms: #) =. 431k The reason for their appearance is as yet unknown, and the laws that control and modify them are utterly obscure.” Obscurity is not exchanged for broad day- light, but something is gained whev we can see that a growth of the principal organ-systems in separate and more or less independent batches, which in an elongated and bilaterally symmetrical animal insensibly passes into the phenomenon of incipient metamery, may be of the highest value for the per- sistence of the species. Now this is actually the way in which we find the important organ-systems distributed in the lower Nemertea. And out of this more irregular distribution a gradual metamery, in some incipient, in others more complete, is seen to evolve within the boundaries of the class. Even the nephridial system, in the primitive forms provided with only one opening to the exterior, participates in this tendency towards metamery, and acquires a greater number of apertures, serially arranged in pairs, thereby also tending towards a diminution of damage when artificial division into two takes place in the nephridial region. The metamery, the regular and serial repetition of parts, is thus seen to be of great importance in aiding towards repair after damage to a lengthened bilateral form, in the same way as the radial repetition of parts facilitates repair in the Echino- dermata. In both cases the destruction is only partial, the other homonodynamic portions temporarily ministering, thanks to their more independent relation to the injured region. When the faculty of repair of damage, occasioned by the severing of the animal into two or more portions, has in the course of generations become more and more complete, it can be readily understood that it becomes at the same time a defen- sive instead of being only a curative process. An animal that at the approach of danger can separate in two or more parts, each of them capable of reproducing an entire new animal, evades this danger very effectively by doing so; whereas another that is attacked in the same way and does not possess this faculty, is laid hold of, shaken about, and wholly or partly RELATION OF THE NEMBRTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 613 swallowed. Soin the Nemertea there is indeed a very strong faculty of spontaneous division combined with the faculty of repair;! and anybody who has observed a fresh and living Cerebratulus, with its extremely delicate sense of touch, commence to rupture into two, in preference at the spot where it was grasped with the forceps, cannot fail to see in this a defensive action. This mode of self-defence may in quite another respect be useful to the species, because at the same time it serves for propagation. Thus we see that the passage of this defensive process to that of reproduction by fission is so gradual, that it would be impossible to decide in every case what name should properly be applied to it. It cannot well be denied that in all probability ours is only a special case, in which the power of reproducing the species by a process of fission, reaching down as far as the unicellular ancestors, has come to be regulated by other motor forces than growth, and—if it may not be called voluntary fission—still may be regarded as sudden and spon- taneous fission, brought about by external influences, of a threatening nature to the further existence of the specimen. This regulation is no doubt a consequence of selection. Schi- zogony having once been established, it must have been further beneficial to the species, on the grounds that were developed above, that the internal organs should be present in multiple numbers, and this having once come about it is easy to under- stand that a regular, rigorously metamerous arrangement of this multiple material, still more fully answers the same pur- pose, and is gradually evolved under the influence of selection. Thus we may be said to be able to follow the appearance of metamery in a bilateral animal, along all the gradual steps by which it is evolved, and many of these steps have remained fixed and permanent in different Nemertean genera. 1 Both M‘Intosh and Barrois have observed and described very peculiar cases of repair in Nemertea, where the head, brain, side-organs, &c., were reproduced on a headless trunk-piece. These experiments are well worthy of careful repetition. It may be that only those fragments in which a portion of the cesophagus was retained were capable of repair of the head. 614 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. The last system that will participate in this metamery is the muscular system, and a rash conclusion—such as is not rare in these days of ontogenetic fetichism—might lead to the rejection of the views concerning metamery here developed, on the consideration that it is exactly the metamery of the muscular system which appears first of all in the ontogenetic development of Vertebrates. I will not circumstantially refute this argument, but will only remark that in Polygordius and other Chetopods, which are representatives of a group of animals in which segmentation reaches such a very high degree of perfection, the longitudinal muscular layer of the body-wall is as yet continuous in the adult, and not divided into meta- meric sections, as it is in certain Arthropods and in Vertebrates. Now let us consider contractions of the inner muscular layer of the Nemertea, the only layer that is common to all of them, from Carinella to Cerebratulus and from Cephalothrix to Pelagonemertes. This layer also corresponds with the longitudinal muscular layer just alluded to of other lower worms, such as Polygordius, and, as was noticed in our paragraph on the muscular system, its contraction is some- times very distinct in favorable sections. We then see the contraction marked out as so many suc- cessive blocks of contracted, thickened fibres, separated by intervening parts of non-contracted fibrous tissue. The sections demonstrate that the phenomenon persists through- out the whole breadth of the animal, i.e. that successive rings of contractile tissue alternate with intervening rings in which no contraction is observed. This phenomenon is thus in a certain degree comparable to an arrangement in distinct myomeres. It is not unimportant that it was especially noticed in the fundamental muscular layer, and it may at the same time be remarked that it appears, from what I have as yet been able to observe myself, that the number of these rings in a given length of the animal is the same, or a multiple of the number of intestinal cca and transverse nerve-tracts in the plexus; in other words, that the incipient metamery of the internal RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 615 organs is in a definite relation to these phenomena—which might also deserve the name of incipient metamery—in the muscular layers. For the present the fact is, however, not yet definitely demon- strated that these successive blocks are indeed present as such in the living animal. The possibility is still open that they may be waves of contraction which have been fixed at the moment of the immersion of the animal in the preserving fluid. For this reason I will not lay any undue weight on this observation. The ideas concerning the origin of metamery here expressed, and advocated for several years in my university lectures, differ from those of Lang (loc. cit.) and Sedgwick,! in so far as they do not recognise the primary importance of the so-called ceelomic sacs—the paired archenteric diverticula of Amphioxus —for the solution of this question. The question of the Vertebrate ccelome, so full of obscurities and difficulties, is purposely left out of consideration here, where the relation to archicelous ancestral forms is discussed, and where an attempt is made to show that it is indeed probable that the impulse towards the establishment of metamery is due to forces for which the archenteron was not the only, nor per- haps the most important part of the organism to act upon. Still more different are they from those advocated by Perrier? and Cattaneo,> who have adhered to and extended the idea already held by others, but by them most actively defended, “that the metamery of Arthropods, Vertebrates, and a great many Vermes, has originated out of the multiplication by transverse fission of very simple primitive worms which were not metamerous. The products of this transverse fission remaining connected together have then formed a chain of individuals, or a linear colony; later on the unity of the chain has become more definitely established, the single individuals at the same time becoming different both in ' A, Sedgwick, “On the Origin of Metameric Segmentation,’ ‘ Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xxiv, p. 43, 1884. ? i. Perrier, ‘Les colonies animales,’ Paris, 1881. 3G. Cattaneo, ‘Le colonie lineari e la morfologia dei Molluscli,’ Milano, 1883. VOL, XXVI1, PART 4,——NEW SER. UU 616 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. form and in function, and the foremost individual thus becom- ing the head of the series. Each segment (metamere) thus represents a reduced individual; a metameric (segmented) animal is the result of the more or less complete fusion of single individuals into an individual of higher order.”’ Emery, from whose paper! I have translated the foregoing sentence, has very successfully combated these propositions. This author, however, adheres to Lang’s views in ascribing to the archenteric pouches, the “ gemmation” as Emery calls it (loc. cit., p. 18) of the intestine, the most important and initial significance for the first origin of metamery, “the sex- ual glands and excretory canals being in relation to the intestinal diverticula,” and following the lead. I have above explained why I cannot adhere to this argumentation, which brings the ccelome and the sacculated intestine too strongly into the foreground, and why I rather suppose incipient metamery to have been antecedent to either of these (e.g. Carinella). On the other hand, many views contained in Emery’s important paper coincide with my own. ‘Thus he writes (loc. cit. p. 11), speaking of that interesting marine Triclade, Gunda segmentata: “The metamery of Gunda is thus manifestly the conse- quence not of the ‘symbiotic’ fusion of a colony of equivalent ‘parts’ (meridi), but of the ‘autobiotic’ differentiation and perfectioning of one ‘part’ (meride);” and further on (p. 15): —‘“ When I consider the facility with which certain worms break into one or more pieces even spontaneously, it appears to me that this capacity for rupture may well have been the origin of the reproductive purpose of transverse scission in similar elongated organisms. The rupture, in the first instance accidental, could have contributed to the more rapid multipli- cation of the organism, being followed by the regeneration of the parts that were deficient in the separate fragments. This process of rupture might further have been so perfected that the spot best adapted for rupture, with a view to the best con- dition of the fragments, was prepared in advance. In the " C. Emery, ‘ Colonie lineare e metameria,’ Napoli, 1883. RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 617 more perfect evolutional phases of the process, which are at the same time those that have till now been more carefully investigated, the new head is formed anteriorly to the rupture, or at least its essential parts are pre-established.” My own views emphasize the presence of a peculiar process ef development of the internal organs, running parallel to this predisposition for rupture in a particular spot—the spot which will correspond to the outwardly visible demarcation between the future segments. They thus go one step further—and, in my opinion, a very essential step—in the attempt to explain the origin of metamery in the lower Platyelminthes, these bilateral descendants of radiate Coelenterata, and at the same time predecessors of both Chordata and Appendiculata.’ This view of the origin of metamery also affords an explana- tion for the very different degrees in which we find metamery or segmentation expressed in the different divisions of the animal kingdom. The incipient metamery which we have traced (and which we have pictured to ourselves as arising through natural selection amongst those forms, which, while developing in length, find metamery to be a protective pecu- liarity) immediately creates, by the fact of its existence, new and variable material for selection, again to be acted upon. And whilst metamery develops in one direction in one line of descendants, the other line brings to the foreground a different set of advantageous combinations, each of them again the stock of new and varied forms. In other words, metamery once established in its most primitive form, and intimately connected with spontaneous fission under the influence of ex- ternal agents, has been of very great moment in the bringing 1 Gegenbaur, in his ‘Grundriss der Vergleichenden Anatomie’ (1878), hints at similar explanations to those advocated by Emery and myself, when he says (p. 64):—“ Die Metamerie . . . lasst Zustinde des Beginnes und der nicht ausgefiihrten Beendigung mannichfach erkennen . . . . In dem Maasse als ein Metamer die Abhingigkeit vom Gesammntorganismus durch die Ausbildung seiner eigenen Organe aufgicbt emancipirt er sich vom Ganzen und gewinnt die Befabigung freier Existenz.” Further on he speaks of inci- pient metamery as “eine stellenweise, fiir den Organismus praktisch werdende Ausbildung ” of the different organ systems. 618 A. A. W. HUBRECHT, about of new and endless variations of animal life. And it is irrational, when we have before us, say one of the lowest Vertebrata, in which nobody will deny the presence of distinct metameric segmentation, to conclude that this metamery must necessarily be in many respects reduced, and that in the an- cestral forms it must have been far more complete, must have stretched forwards along the whole of the head, must have been more forcibly expressed than it is now—in all the cephalic nerves, in the nephridia, the gill-slit, &c. ;—all this on the pre- sumption of the existence of an ancestor so completely and exemplarily segmental as to throw no light on the origin of segmentation and metamery, unless by the aid of Perrier’s and Cattaneo’s exaggerations. Such conclusions must, however, necessarily be made by those who follow Dohrn’s and Semper’s lead concerning the phylogeny of the Chordata. Bateson, in taking Balanoglossus as his starting-point, finds the acknowledged points of resemblance in the meta- merous gill-slits, &c., and adds to them important data con- cerning the metamerous ccelomic diverticula. Still, for a general view on the origin of metamery, Balanoglossus offers no points that we do not find more strongly represented and more forcibly expressed in the Nemertea. It certainly deserves mention that long before Bateson drew renewed attention to the numerous points of agreement between Balanoglossus and the Chordata, M‘Intosh! had done the same for Balanoglossus and the Nemertea, a separate para- graph of his monograph being devoted to the discussion of these homologies. Sedgwick (loc. cit.) holds the unsegmented worms to be wholly ‘ negligeable quantities,” at any rate superfluous links in the chain that connects the Chordata with the antecedent Diploblastic stages. In my idea both these authors, valuable as certain of their suggestions are, have not been thoroughly aware of the necessity that, in all discussions on the origin of metameric segmentation, we must attempt to grasp at data 1 W. M‘Intosh, ‘A Monograph of British Annelids,’ ‘A, Nemerteans,” Ray Society Publications, 1878, 1874. RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 619 that give a clue to the possible action of natural selection in the gradual evolution of metamery. This clue appears to me to be far more distinctly contained in the views here advocated than in the other hypotheses. It may further be remarked, now that we have once more alluded to Bateson’s phylogeny of the Chordata, that even this naturalist does not feel justified in wholly rejecting the Nemertea from the Vertebrate pedigree. Whilst in the text of his article (loc. cit. p. 566) he does seem to prefer this negative alternative ; still, in the subjoined diagram of the general relationships of Urochorda, Hemichorda, Cephalo- chorda, and Vertebrata, the Nemertea are introduced—with a point of interrogation, however—as a side branch lower down on the common parent stock. Now, this being concordant with my own views of the Chordate phylogeny,—the point of interrogation excepted,—it is necessary to inquire why there is this discrepancy between Bateson’s speculations in the body of his treatise and the hypothetical pedigree at the end of it. It appears to me that this is due to his hesitation (loc. cit. p. 555) in accepting the views hitherto entertained and advo- cated by myself as to the phylogenetic connection between the Nemertean and the Vertebrate nervous system. For this hesi- tation Bateson has good reasons, and while I appreciate the soundness of them, I hope in the remainder of this chapter to remove the reluctance of him and others to accept the phylo- genetic significance of the Nemertea, thanks to new light that may be thrown on the evolution of the central nervous system of the Chordata by the observations recorded by me on the nervous system of the “‘ Challenger ” Nemertea. It is to these speculations on the nervous system that we now have to turn our attention. As will be seen from the terminology introduced in the paragraph on the nervous system in my Report on the “Chal- lenger’ Nemertea, and as it is now time more fully to develop, I am inclined to attach considerable morphological importance to the arrangement of the different constituent parts of the nervous system in the Nemertea. In former publications I 620 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. have repeatedly insisted on the significance of certain points in the anatomy of the Nemertea, when considering the general question of the relationship of the Chordata to their unknown invertebrate ancestors, and I have insisted not only on the possibility of the homology between the Nemertean proboscis and the hypophysis cerebri of the Vertebrates, but I have, even earlier still, attempted to show that the nerve-system of these two groups might be considered in a common light, as was first indicated by Harting in his ‘ Leerboek van de Grond- beginselen der Dierkunde,’ of the year 1874. Further reference to the hypothesis here alluded to is found in Balfour’s Mono- graph on the Elasmobranch Fishes (pp. 170—172), in my own publications'—, and in Balfour’s ‘Comparative Embryology ”” (vol. ii, p. 258). Iwill not here enter upon this hypothesis more fully, but will briefly state that it attempted to consider the central nervous system of the Vertebrates as a possible median coalescence of two nerve-trunks, that were lateral in the primitive ancestors of the Vertebrates, in the same way as the coalesced ventral nerve-cord (Bauchmark) of Annelids and Arthropods may be considered with Gegenbaur as having arisen out of a double lateral trunk, which in certain, still more highly differentiated, forms have fused ventro-medially. A strong argument against the first-mentioned hypothesis is the fact that the spinal cord ontogenetically always makes its appearance as a median unpaired plate or thickening, a very faint trace of a possible double origin of this plate being hitherto only observable in one species of Amphibia, Triton teniatus; whereas in all other Vertebrates); Amphioxus 1 «Zur Anatomie und Physiologie des Nervensystems der Nemertinen,” ‘ Verhandel. van de Koninkl. Akad. van Wetenschappen,’ Amsterdam, 1880, vol. xx. ‘The Peripheral Nervous System of the Palso- and the Schizo- nemertea, one of the layers of the body-wall,” ‘ Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xx, 1880. * It may here be remarked that Balfour has omitted to mention that Harting was the first to bring forward this hypothesis ; it is well to be reminded of this when Beard, Bateson, and others similarly ignore this claim to priority of my venerated predecessor, RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 621 and the Cyclostomata not excepted, the unpaired origin is most evident. The bilateral symmetry of the full-grown brain and spinal cord is a much later feature, and can hardly be regarded as the expression of a primary coalescence of two separate halves to form a median whole. I am the more inclined to abandon this hypothesis because I will attempt to show that we can establish phylogenetic com- parisons between the Chordate and the Nemertean nervous system ona much more simple basis; comparisons which at the same time cover a far more extensive ground than did those of Harting, Balfour, and myself, which I have just alluded to. - Since in the nervous plexus of all the Nemertea a median longitudinal tract, sometimes of comparatively large size, has now been detected, since even in the Hoplonemertea, where the plexus has disappeared, the same medio-dorsal nerve-tract has in most cases been preserved, and, finally, since from this dorso-median stem metameric and paired nerve-tracks may be seen to emerge in Palzonemertea and Schizonemertea, we must inquire in how far the direct comparison of this medio- dorsal nerve-stem with a primitive spinal cord may be said to hold good. In order to do this we must first consider the relation of this stem, to which we have given the name of medullary nerve or medulla, to the rest of the nervous system, more especially the brain-lobes.! Ina former publication,? where the medullary nerve was for the first time noticed and described as the pro- boscidian-sheath-nerve, I traced its origin to the dorsal com- missure between the two lateral halves of the brain (loc. cit., pl. i, fig. 1). Thanks to certain very favorable specimens in the Challenger collection, I have now been able to add new data to this statement. Sections through the brain of Cere- bratulus macroren, Cerebratulus corrugatus, and 1 Tn the course of these considerations a certain amount of repetition of facts already noticed in the paragraph on the nervous system cannot well be avoided. ? Verhand. Kon. Akad. v. Wetensch., Amsterdam, vol. xx, 1880. 622 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. Cerebratulus angusticeps (‘Zool. Challenger, Exp.,’ Part 54, pl. xii, figs. 1, 7,8; pl. xiii, fig. 1) show that the condition of things is indeed less simple than this original statement would imply,—that the medullary nerve is not an eminently fibrous cord springing at right angles from the eminently fibrous upper brain-commissure, but that the nerve- tissue constituting the foremost and uppermost portions of the upper brain-lobes spreads out over a far more considerable surface than the fibrous tract which is known as the dorsal commissure. This expansion of nerve-tissue, in which the cellular elements are no less conspicuous than the fibrous, is posteriorly directly continuous with the plexus above described, laterally with the brain-lobes, anteriorly with the cephalic nerves springing from these lobes. It attains its fullest deve- lopment just before and behind the region where a transverse bundle of fibres uniting the fibrous core of the lateral brain- lobes forms the well-known dorsal brain-commissure. ‘This commissure is a transverse fibrous tract forming part of a more extensive nerve-plate. To this expansion of nerve-tissue the presence of nerve-cells gives a more primitive, at any rate a less specialised, character. These nerve-cells and nerve-fibres are directly continuous with those of the medullary nerve and (backwards) with those of the nerve-plexus, of which this nerve is only the median longitudinal thickening. ‘There is even more reason to look upon the fibres of this medullary nerve as a tract of the general fibrous stroma not necessarily connected with the fibres of the brain-commissure. In other cases a more direct continuity between the commissural and the medullary nerve-fibres was, however, observed. In order clearly to understand the relative importance of the different parts of the nervous system here noticed, the primitive Paleonemertea offer the best starting-point. Thus in Carinella we find the brain-lobes not yet separated into distinct upper and lower lobes, nor do we find a posterior lobe (side-organ). The brain is a double lateral and anterior thickening in the nerve-plexus, situated like it and like the lateral nerve-stems outside the muscular body-wall in the RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 623 deeper strata of the integument. The only difference between the medio-dorsal medullary nerve in this species and the lateral nerves with their anterior enlargements (the brain-lobes) is its position and its greater tenuity (Pl. XLII, fig. 1), which, however, does not prevent its being very clearly observable in every transverse section. Its connection with the brain-com- missure was already described and figured by me (loc. cit., p. 25, pl. iii, fig. 81). It must, however, be remarked that in these most primitive Paleeonemertea the anterior dorsal brain-com- missure is less significant than in the Schizonemertea, and hardly anything else than the foremost of those numerous transverse metameric tracts in the plexus (dvr, Pl. XLII, fig. 1) which connect the lateral stems with the medullary nerve (dorsally) and with each other (ventrally). These important metameric nerve-pairs are most distinctly observed in Carinella. Here, as in the Schizonemertea, the medullary nerve is also continued forwards in front of the brain thickenings. This continuation sometimes shows a short bend just on the level of the commissure, so that both the medullary nerve and its anterior continuation may be seen in one section. Posteriorly the medullary nerve can be followed down to the hindmost extremity of the body. In Eupolia and the Schizo- nemertea the arrangement remains the same, the metamery of the transverse stems is perhaps more clearly expressed, the whole plexus and the longitudinal stems are no longer in the integument, but between the muscular layers. Still, the whole of the nervous system also answers to the general type as represented in the diagrammatic fig. 1 on Pl. XLII. We have now seen enough of it to understand that a comparison with the central apparatus of the Vertebrate nervous system cannot indeed be called a strained comparison. On the con- trary, the comparison is much less artificial than was the one which Balfour was inclined to adopt, and which, as noted above, rendered necessary the acceptance of the phylogenetic development of the Vertebrate medulla of a double cord. And so I do not hesitate to proclaim the medullary nerve of the Nemertea to be a very important link in the phylogenetic 624 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. chain, of which the Vertebrate spinal cord is the outcome. Like the Nemertean medulla, the Vertebrate spinal cord is median, unpaired, and composed of nerve-cells and nerve- fibres; like the Nemertean medulla, it is a thickening in a ner- vous plexus, originally wholly epiblastic, of which, among Vertebrates, the Amphibian embryos offer such a striking example. This instructive and suggestive case was known to Remak and Stricker (as the “* Nervenschicht” of the frog em- bryo), it was more carefully studied and elaborately described by Goette (his “Grundschicht” of the epiblast, in his ‘Entwicke- lungsgeschichte der Unke’), and it has been again recently brought into the foreground by Baldwin Spencer, in his latest paper on the subject.1 The latter author compares the Am- phibian plexus with that of Paleonemertea and Schizone- mertea (loc. cit., p. 134), as had already been done before him by my friend Professor Ray Lankester, with whose sug- gestion I at that time (1880) did not yet venture fully to associate myself. The numerous data that have since been accumulated for a direct comparison of Nemertea with lower Vertebrates appear, however, now to fully justify that comparison which was first expressed in a footnote to a former paper of mine.? There can hardly be any doubt as to the existence, consequent upon natural selection, of a constant tendency in the different component parts of living organisms towards simplification and increased efficiency (Roux’s ‘Kampf der Theile im Or- ganismus’). This fact enables us to understand the gradual supremacy of the median cord in the Nemertean plexus over the two lateral ones. It seems as if it were mathematically demonstrable that for the delicate adjustment of the impressions from the exterior to the co-ordinated movements thereby occa- sioned, one longitudinal central stem in bilateral, lengthened animals would be more efficacious than two lateral ones. And if we ask if, at the final stage of this struggle for supremacy 1 Baldwin Spencer, “Some notes on the early Development of Rana tem- poraria,” ‘Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci.,’ vol. xxv; Suppl., p. 123, 1885. 2 ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ vol. xx, 1880, p. 438. RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 625 between three longitudinal stems, any remnants of the lateral cords are yet detectable in the Vertebrate embryos, perhaps even in the adults, I am inclined to answer in the affirmative. Here I must be allowed to insert a reference to the three figures on Pl. XLII, which will facilitate the exposition of the further consequences of the hypothesis I am here developing Fig. 1 represents the chief points in the nervous system of the Nemertea. The brain-lobes are simple lateral swellings of the longitudinal stems, as in Carinella; plexus, medulla, and transverse stems, together with brain-lobes and lateral stems, may be considered as forming part of the integument (ef. Carinina). A double innervation of the respiratory portion of the intestine is indicated; one due to visceral branches (vi. sy) springing from the plexus (or from its transverse tracts), the other to the more specialised nerve (v), which has above been indicated as the Nemertean vagus nerve. The plexus and its innumerable radial fibres, both sensory and motor, are not indicated in this figure, nor are the nerve-stems which, when present, pass from the lateral stems directly to the integument. This figure must now be compared with the two others. Of these, Pl. XLII, fig. 2, diagrammatically represents the chief points that may be considered as characteristic of the nervous system of a lower Vertebrate, in which the dorsal and ventral roots of the spinal nerves (dr and vr) are as yet separate nerve- tracts, in which the sympathetic nerve system is as yet only represented by visceral branches given off by these dorsal roots (vz. sy), and in which the polymerous character of a primitive vagus (Vag) is established. Pl. XLII, fig. 3, stands for Amphioxus, as far as we know its nervous system, more particularly through the researches of Rohon and others. It differs from the foregoing by the absence of a distinct brain swelling and of a polymerous vagus. A number of spinal nerves are considered as homologous with the vagus of Vertebrates by Rohon. The commissural con- nections between the successive spinal nerves form a plexus, which is peripherally even much more elaborate, according to 626 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. Rohon’s figures. This plexus does not reveal the presence of any distinct lateral longitudinal nerve, nor any ganglia of spinal or cephalic nerves. The latter (cn) may be said to be three in number. Visceral branches (v7. sy) are given off by the dorsal nerves (d7). The ventral ones, springing from the lower edge of the medulla, are here represented as shorter stems (vr). The opposite half of the system, seen in transparent per- spective, as given in the two other figures, is purposely omitted here, because of the asymmetry of Amphioxus in this respect. Now a glance at these figures will convince us that the situation of the Nemertean medullary nerve in its plexus, and with its set of transverse nerves, is directly comparable to the Vertebrate medulla and spinal nerves. The nerve-plexus filling up the intervening spaces in Nemertea is present as a transitory structure in Amphibian embryos. The ulterior appearance of an anterior enlargement forming the Vertebrate brain; the higher complication attained by the brain and spinal cord when its mass increases, but not its dorsal expansion, by the appearance of medullary ridges ; and the formation of a neural canal by infolding of the neural plate, all these are important developmental facts which do not in any way weaken the grounds for comparison of the two structures. They may be looked upon as adaptations to the much more considerable efficiency and concentration that is gradually attained by the central nervous system as we ascend higher in the scale of the animal kingdom. The fact that the neural ridge in so many Vertebrata precedes the appearance of the spinal nerves, and is inserted along the top of the folds that bend together to form the neural tube, may be thus interpreted, that during the phylo- genetic process of infolding the transverse nerve-tracts (dorsal spinal roots) remain attached in the same way to the medio- dorsal collecting trunk as they did in the ancestral forms, and are dragged upwards by the infolding process. The ventral roots must be phylogenetically linked to the plexus as well; RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 627 inasmuch as the musculature originally lies inwards of the nervous plexus, their deeper situation is not surprising. In the points hitherto enumerated there is entire coinci- dence between Amphioxus and the other Vertebrata, as far as their comparability with the Nemertean diagram goes. Another point of coincidence is the way in which the foremost position of the intestinal canal and adjacent blood-vessels are innervated by visceral nerve-stems, indicated in all the three diagrams by vw. sy. The claims to validity of the comparison here made between the spinal nerves of the Chordata and the transverse stems of the Nemertea should again be insisted on, now that the researches of Rohon,' Freud,” Schneider, Ransom, and d’Arcy Thompson? have established for the lower Chordata (Cephalo- chorda and Cyclostomata) that the typical chordate spinal nerve is not originally provided with a double root, but that this double root appears to have arisen by the coalescence of what were primitively in the groups just mentioned separate and alternating dorsal and ventral nerve-tracts. With these so much simpler spinal nerves the transverse nerve-stems of the Nemertea undoubtedly offer points of comparison. These Nemertean nerves specially differ from the Vertebrate spinal nerves in two respects: (1) they give off nerve-fibres in differ- ent directions, which are probably motor as well as sensory and visceral, according to the different organ systems they 1V. Rohov, “Untersuchungen itiber Amphioxus lanceolatus,’’ * Denkschr. d. k. Akad. d. Wiss. Wien,’ Bd. xlv. 2 §. Freud, “ Ueber Spinalganglién und Riickenmark des Petromyzon (‘Sitzungsb. math.-nat. cl. k, Akad. Wiss. Wien,’ Bd. Ixxviii, Abth. 3, 1878). This author says (p. 154) :—‘“‘ Ich kann wenigstens von den letzten Wurzeln des Caudalmarks sagen dass ihre Selbstandigkeit so gross ist, dass man von vorderen und hinteren Spinalnerven, anstatt von vorderen und_hinteren Wurzeln reden konute ”; and Wiedersheim in the 2nd edition of his ‘ Lehr- buch der Vergleichenden Anatomie’ (p. 321) :—* Vieles spricht dafiir dass die Vorfahren der heutigen Wirbelthiere getrennte dorsale und ventrale Ner- venwurzeln besessen haben miissen.” 3 W. R. Ransom and d’Arcy W. Thompson, “ On the Spinal and Viscera Nerves of Cyclostomata,” ‘ Zool. Anzeiger,’ No. 227, July, 1886. 628 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. terminate in; and (2) they go round ventrally, each of them forming a loop all round the body. As to the first point of difference just alluded to, it is the expression of a low and primitive degree of differentiation, and when a step forwards is made differentiation of labour will tend to develop certain tracts more particularly containing sensory and visceral nerve- fibres, which are more especially directed towards the epithelia (the primitive dorsal or posterior roots), and others more particularly containing motor nerve-fibres, and more especially directed inwards towards the muscles (the primitive ventral or anterior roots), because the musculature, as was already men- tioned, is originally situated internally to the nervous system. For the present we can only hold it to be established that the fibres of these three categories are blended in the Nemer- tean plexus, without being able to determine in how far the specialisation therein observed, of the appearance of transverse metameric nerves, may at the same time be accompanied by a commencement of differentiation, such as has just been alluded to. We may, in other words, not yet assume that among these metameric stems there is already a tendency to an alternation between such as have sensory and visceral and such as have motor predispositions. Only in a few cases may we be justified in saying that certain nerve-tracts belonging to the Nemertean peripheral system are more especially sensory or visceral, and these no doubt offer important analogies in their situation and connec- tions to similar nerve-tracts of the Vertebrata The second point of difference, viz. the continuity in the ventral median line of the transverse tracts of the Nemertea, is no doubt a consequence (a) of their origin, in a perfectly continuous plexus, (4) of the cylindrical arrangement of the muscular layers, which in most cases are uninterrupted both in the dorsal and in the ventral median line. It is all the more important to notice that, more especially in the primitive Carinellide, the tendency is very marked towards a scission of this muscular body-wall into a right and a left half. This longitudinal scission is no doubt the first expression of RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 629 the phenomenon which shows us the musculature of the right and left half of the body, developing quite independently in the Chordata. It is easy intelligible how, as this phenomenon gradually becomes more and more marked, no more ventral connecting fibres across the non-muscular region were required for the innervation of the musculature of the right and left half of the body. The process by which the transverse nerve-tract, with radial - nerve-fibres leaving it at short intervals, both centripetally and centrifugally, gradually assumed the form of a nerve-stem with a dorsal and a ventral branch, such as we find in the spinal nerves, must have gone on pari passu with those numerous other changes which we cannot as yet fully trace, but which must have occurred when (1) the muscular meta- mery became gradually established, (2) the dorso-median me- dullary tract became so preponderant that an increase in mass, with economy of bulk, was only to be obtained by a process of folding-in already discussed above, and (3) the attachment of the spinal nerves (transverse tracts) to the medulla was modified in consequence of this process. None of these phenomena, however, offer anything that is in any way inconsistent with, or opposed to, the general theory here developed. We have now sufficiently insisted on the chief point of comparison here proposed, viz. that between the Nemertean medullary nerve and its metameric transverse nerve-cords and the Vertebrate cerebro-spinal axis and spinal nerves. If Amphioxus were the only Vertebrate known, we should, recognising the phylogenetic importance of the plexiform arrangement still met with in the adult of that species, admit that, as far as we know at present, the primary lateral nerves with their anterior swellings of the Vermian ancestors had disappeared in the same measure as the dorso-median spinal cord had come more and more into the foreground. But our consideration of other Vertebrates leads us to the conclusion that, when once the general homology between the two nervous systems is admitted, there may perhaps be secondary 630 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. points in regard to which the comparison can be further ex- tended. And it must be recognised that, if we should also succeed in rendering more or less probable a comparison in secondary details, this might again be favorably interpreted for the primary and more important part of the hypothesis. The search after these secondary points of agreement was instituted by me when the question above alluded to presented itself, viz. if any remnant could be traced of the central ner- vous system of Nemertea-like ancestors, i.e. of the brain-lobes and lateral stems, in those Vertebrate descendants in which the medio-dorsal tract had become so preponderant as to give rise to the unpaired medulla and brain. It is clear that if it shall be possible to trace any such rem- nants, and to render their homology with the Nemertean central nervous system probable, they will have to be sought for— (a) in the head, as lateral more or less independent nerve- centra, innervating sense-organs of the integument, and passing posteriorly into parallel longitudinal stems; or (8) in the trunk, as longitudinal nerve-stems, in which the central character should be somewhat less marked than in the anterior swelling, but in which the original significance as parts of the central system should still be indicated either by histological or by embryological features. To these latter conditions nothing can answer in the Verte- brate nervous system excepting the so-called ramus lateralis vagi. It is present in all Vertebrates above Amphioxus, long and important in the aquatic Ichthyopsida, gradually disappearing when the aquatic medium is exchanged for an air-breathing existence, and finally only retained in the higher Vertebrates as the inconspicuous ramus auricularis vagi. Its course is indeed strictly lateral, and has always been a puzzle to anatomists. Stannius! characterises the existence and the course of this sensory nerve along the trunk down to the tail as “ one of the most interesting facts of anatomy.” None the less startling is its development. Whilst Balfour attempted in this respect to bring it on one line with the other ‘ «Das peripherische Nervensystem der Fische,’ p. 108. RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 631 parts of the peripheral nervous system, the corresponding re- sults of Semper, Goette, van Wijhe, and Hoffmann are all in the contrary direction. They have seen the nervus lateralis appear as an independent product of the epiblast, arising in loco along its whole length, its formation often even preceding that of the spinal nerves. These results have again been fully confirmed and definitely established by the latest investigator of the problem, Beard,! who also gives a detailed description and figures of the connection between the nervus lateralis and the vagus ganglion, both of them so much more massive and conspicuous in early embryonic stages than later on. And now that we are attempting to find out whether there is a possibility of comparing the lateral nerve-stems of lower worms with the nervus lateralis of Vertebrata, we are naturally led to consider, in the second place, the question whether the anterior swellings of these lateral stems (the paired brain-lobes of the worm) may have their morphological equivalents, their remnants, in the set of anterior nervous swellings that are found in the head on a level with the nervus lateralis, and longitudinally connected with it; viz. the variable set of ganglia of the cephalic nerves. As to the origin of these ganglia of the cranial nerves I have no observations of my own, and must rely on the data of other observers. It is suggestive to give the opinion of the three latest in- vestigators of the development of these organs in different groups of Vertebrates in their own words. Professor A. Froriep,? who studied Mammalian embryos, writes (loc. cit., p. 35):—“The ganglia (of facialis, glosso- pharyngeus, and vagus) enter into a peculiar, very intimate connection with the epiderm ;” further (p. 40), “these gangli- onic connections with the epiderm must probably be regarded 1 «The System of Branchial Sense-Organs, &c., in Ichthyopsida,” ‘ Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci.,? November, 1885, p. 95. 2 «Ueber Anlagen von Sinnesorganen am Facialis, &.,” ‘ Archiv f. Anat. u. Phys.,’ 1885, Anat. Abth. VOL. XXVII, PART 4,.—NEW SER, xx 632 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. as rudiments of organs which have phylogenetically disappeared, and which are only now retained in the ontogenetic develop- ment ;” then (p. 43) “ for the Gasserian ganglion there is no indication of a connection with the epiderm;” and, lastly (p. 52), “it appears to be hardly any longer possible to look upon these nerve-ganglia (Nervenknoten) as simply homologous with spinal ganglia.” Baldwin Spencer! writes (loc. cit., p. 129) concerning Rana temporaria: “Along certain lines the cells of the nervous layer proliferate, and it is by this proliferation that the rudiments of the cranial nerves are laid down;” further (p. 180), ‘the development of the ganglia at the level of the lateral line, and the fact of their long connection with the epi- blast at this point,.... . is of great interest in connection with certain points in the development of the Elasmobranch nerves.” Concerning the developmental phenomena of the trunk- region at this period, the spinal nerves are stated to be not yet visible, ‘though the nervous sheath is clearly developed and in this the lateral line.” The author next mentions observations made by him on Dr. Beard’s sections of Elasmobranch embryos, and goes on to say (loc. cit., p. 131): “The Gasserian ganglion is, at all events in part, formed directly from the epiblast..... the same development takes place in the case of the ganglion of the third and seventh nerve—in that of the ciliary ganglion the develop- ment is particularly clear—..... The ganglia arise along a level of the lateral line continued on the head.” He next says: “‘ The curious origin of the ganglia of the cranial nerves points strongly to the conclusion that ..... their present condition and nature must..... be regarded as a secondary and certainly not primitive condition. “Tn passing, I may just notice that on this supposition an 1 «Early Development of Rana temporaria,” ‘Quart. Journ. Mier, Sci,,’ Suppl., 1885. RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 633 explanation is offered as to the origin and meaning of the two curious branches which unite respectively the ganglia of the fifth and seventh and fifth and third cranial nerves ; they may be regarded as persistent parts of the lateral nerve . in the head.” In the third place extracts will be given from Beard’s more extensive paper.! He writes (p. 97) as an introductory state- ment: “ At present we are acquainted with no Invertebrate nervous system which is built upon the same plan as that of Vertebrates,” and then passes to the results of his investiga- tions, chiefly carried out on embryos of Torpedo and a few other Elasmobranchs. I make the following selections (p TOL): “At the point of fusion” (of the cephalic nerve with the epiblast) “a local thickening of epiblast has previously taken place. After the fusion has taken place a proliferation of some of the cells composing the thickening ensues. The proliferated cells form a mass of actively dividing elements still connected with the skin. ... . This mass of cells is the rudiment of the ganglion of the dorsal root.” On p. 110 he adds: “ Along with the separation of the (vagus) ganglion from the skin the sensory thickening begins to grow backwards along the lateral surface of the trunk. This thickening is the rudiment of the so-called lateral line. BU A gar eee: The so-called lateral nerve is formed from the deeper portion of the sensory thickening...... That there is no actual growth backwards of the nerve is obvious enough.” Recapitulating, we must acknowledge that the mode of origin of the ganglia of the cephalic nerves, as described by these authors, is certainly a peculiar one—a mode of development sui generis. One of Beard’s accompanying diagrammatic figures, reproduced in Wiedersheim’s second edition (1886) of the ‘Lehrbuch der Vergleichenden Anatomie’ as woodcut No. 265, moreover, shows how the position of the cephalic ganglion, developing as an ectodermal proliferation, is in this 1 “Branchial Sense-Organs in Ichthyopsida,” ‘Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci.,’ November, 1885, No. CI, 634 A. A. W. HUBREOHT. early stage eminently lateral, a conclusion corroborated by the figures of his actual sections. This primitive position is, of course, gradualiy lost, and could never be predicted from a study of these ganglia and their position and significance in the adult animal. Yet it is not without significance when seen in the light of the suggestion here brought forward. And that the interpretation of the phenomena in question as given by these authors is not universally accepted, thus leaving room for new suggestions, is proved by the following citation from Ransom’s and d’Arcy Thompson’s latest article,! running as follows :—‘‘ Although the lamprey presents a_ well-marked lateralis nerve it has not also a regular lateral line, for the sense-organs of the skin are scattered and without segmental arrangement. The sense-organs do not, therefore, appear to be in direct relation with the spinal ganglia, and the view of the close connection between them (Spencer, Beard, Froriep) does not receive support...... It seems more natural to consider the lateralis as a relic of the extensive and irregu- lar commissure system connecting the posterior roots of Amphioxus.” Passing from a consideration of the embryonic ganglia to their connection in the adults, I must mention the connection of the ramus lateralis vagi with cephalic nerves anterior to the vagus. I will not here give a description of the numerous varieties presented by this nervous connection, but merely refer to the arrangement in Vertebrates so low as the lam- preys. We there find, according to Johannes Miller, the ramus lateralis originating from the seventh as well as from the tenth pair of cephalic nerves, and if we compare the very satisfactory figure which was only lately? given by Ahlborn of this arrangement, we must recognise that this nervous con- nection is importaut, and has more the aspect of a direct for- ward continuation of the nervus lateralis than of a sensory 1 «On the Spinal and Visceral Nerves of Cyclostomata,” ‘ Zool. Anzeiger,’ No. 227, July, 1886. 2 ¢ Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xl, pl. xviii. RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 635 branch from the facialis, establishing a connection between it and the vagus. Ahlborn mentions the existence of a similar connecting stem reaching further forward still, and connecting the trige- minus and facialis. How these connections vary in the different adult Vertebrata will not be discussed here. The different facts and speculations here brought forward in connection with the cephalic ganglia and the nervus lateralis vagi may suffice for the present. They may severally be brought to bear upon the question of the eventual homology of Vertebrate cephalic ganglia and nervus lateralis, on the one hand, and Vermian paired brain-lobes and lateral nerve-stems on the other. The parts here compared being indicated in figs. 1 and 2 of Pl. XLII, with corresponding letters (Ly and In), a glance at these figures may further convey a notion of the purport of these speculations. There is one fact, however, which is not indicated in these figures, which is nevertheless of very high importance for the views here considered, and which I must therefore develop more in detail. It is the connection between the successive spinal nerves and the ramus lateralis vagi. The existence of similar connections between the (eminently sensory and cutaneous) dorsal roots and the (similarly sensory and cutaneous) lateral nerve is for the first time mentioned by Ransom and d’Arcy Thompson for Petromyzon in the following passage (loc. cit., p. 422): “The dorsal rami of the posterior roots pass up (over the lateralis nerve) to the skin of the back, but appear also to send fibres into the lateralis. (For this statement we at present rely only on sections, but we hope shortly to test it by dissections of the large Petromyzon marinus.)” It hardly needs comment that if this observation should be confirmed the fact would be of the utmost importance for the hypothesis under discussion. We should then be permitted to consider these metameric connections between the dorsal roots and the nervus lateralis of Petromyzon, as the relics of an 636 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. earlier stage, still permanent in the Nemertea, where the metamerically consecutive transverse nerve-tracts similarly unite the medullary nerve and the lateral stems. This connection is, as we know, also brought about in the Nemertea by the plexus, in those parts of it which spread out between the transverse tracts, and it may here be asked if relics of such a plexus between the successive precursors of the spinal nerves are perhaps retained, not only in Amphioxus (see above, p. 625, and Rohon, loc. cit., fig. 13), but also in Osseous Fishes, in the numerous superficial nerves described and figured by Stannius,’ or whether we must rather look upon this multiplication of lateral nerves (one of which is called by Stannius the nervus lateralis trigemini, others, rami communicantes of the dorsal branches of spinal nerves, &c.) as derivatives from the nervus lateralis vagi.? This question can, of course, only be solved by careful anatomical and embryological investigations. That the nervus lateralis was often (Stannius) observed in the Petromyzontide only along a part of the length of the body (Schneider and Born, ac- cording to Ahlborn,’ observed it as “bis an das Hinterende des Korpers”’?) is not confirmed by modern investigators. Ahlborn’s description (loc. cit., p. 304) of the variable situation of this nerve in Petromyzon is very suggestive in connection with the views here advocated. Ransom and d’Arcy Thompson consider that the regularity of the in- tegumentary sensory apparatus is not yet established in Petromyzon, as may be concluded from the citation given above. We have now considered the superficial ramifications of what I may call the lateral nerve-system, both in lower worms and in Vertebrates; we must now turn to the intestinal, to 1 «Das peripherische Nervensystem der Fische,’ 1849, pls. ii—iv. 2 It should be remembered that Beard is inclined (loc. cit., p. 139) to look upon the superficial longitudinal nerve-fibres, by which the successive epithelial modifications along the lateral line are often connected (Solger, Bodenstein), as such derivatives (by longitudinal fission in its very early stages) of the nervus lateralis. 3 *Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool.’ Bd. xl. pp. 303 and 301. RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 637 the visceral branches of this same system, from which other and important data may be gathered for further elucidation of the hypothesis under consideration. We have already seen that in Nemertea the typical innerva- tion of the respiratory portion of the intestine is brought about—(a) by a pair of nerves directed backwards and spring- ing from the anterior lateral swellings (the brain-lobes) of the lateral nerve-stems; (0) by numerous visceral branches starting from the plexus, directed inwards as branches that spread over the wall of blood-lacune and intestine. In the Vertebrata, Amphioxus excepted, we also find that the innervation of the anterior respiratory portion of the intestine and of the circulatory apparatus is obtained from two sources, viz. (1) the cephalic nerves, amongst which the vagus nerve is in this respect the most important;! (2) the visceral branches of the spinal nerves, which are at the basis of what is afterwards more highly differentiated and separately recognised as the sympathetic nerve-system. In Nemertea it is very difficult to determine in the anterior part of the intestinal wall which tracts belong to the so-called vagus nerve, which to this system of visceral nerve-branches. So it is often in Vertebrata, and the blending together (in both divisions of the animal kingdom) of two systems, each of them again mutually comparable when separately considered, is an important point of agreement, and would, if no actual homology were at the base of it, be a very puzzling coincidence. It is in this respect highly suggestive that Born notices, as early as 1827, what was afterwards confirmed by Ahlborn (Joe. cit.) and others, that in Petromyzon, i.e. one of the lowest Vertebrates, the spinal nerves send out connecting branches towards the pneumogastric nerves. The existence 1 Ventrally these nerves (e.g. the n. hypoglossus) are sometimes commis- surally united with their representative of the opposite half of the body. It must remain an open question whether these commissures are in any way comparable either to the Nemertean vagus commissures (cf. p. 83), or to the general ventral commissural system of these worms. 638 A. A. W. HUBRECHT. of superficial metameric connections (Ransom and d’Arcy Thompson, vide supra) as well as of this set of deeper connections between the transverse and the latero-longitu- dinal nerve-stems (n. lateralis and nu. pneumogastricus, of Petromyzon would thus be a remarkable repetition of the similar arrangement in the Nemertea, as it has been here for the first time demonstrated. The facts as they lie before us do not, however, admit of any very circumstantial comparison so far as the nerves in particular are concerned, and I purposely refrain from entering into any details. Yet it should be remarked : (1) That the polymerous root of the Vertebrate vagus nerve is very readily explicable if we take the Nemertean arrange- ment as a starting-point (Pl. XLII, figs. 1, 2, vag), as is also the mixture of sensory and motor elements in this root.! (2) That similarly, if the anterior cephalic nerves (e.g. the fifth) should prove to be polymerous, this would in no way be astonishing nor difficult to bring into harmony with that same starting-point. (3) That the presence of superficial branches to the integu- ment and to the musculature, and of deeper branches to the intestinal epithelium in those parts that will contribute to form the cephalic nerves, is similarly foreshadowed in the Nemertea. (4) That the equivalent of the Nemertean vagus nerve will have to be sought for in such branches of the Vertebrate vagus as more especially innervate the intestinal epithelium,” whereas 1 Rohon, “‘ Ueber den Ursprung des Nervus vagus bei Selachiern,” ‘ Arbeit. Zool. Inst. Wien,’ vol. i, p. 159. 2 | have good reasons, based upon actual observations made by my pupil, Mr. Dobberke, to believe that the ramus intestinalis vagi in adult Hlasmo- branchs may be traced centripetally from its region of innervation of the foremost portion of the intestinal wall, towards the brain, as a bundle of nerve- fibres running parallel to and combined with those for the branchial apparatus, but that, nevertheless, this bundle can be separately traced up to the vagus ganglion, without any further intimate relation to those branchial branches (cf. Beard, loc. cit., p. 110). If this should actually be the case, the possibility of a direct comparison between the Nemertean RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 6389 the innervation of the Vertebrate gill-slits, which marks a later phylogenetic stage, in which these perforations of the anterior trunk region have appeared, may be as well put to the account of more superficial parts of the transverse tracts. (5) That the common starting-point of the sensory, lateral, and the intestinal portion of the vagus has also attracted the attention of former observers. Ransom and d’Arcy Thompson write: “In the embryo dog-fish the second or ventral com- missure, described by Balfour, &c., as uniting the roots of the vagus, ventral to the ganglia, is essentially a sympathetic com- missure, whose (visceral) fibres pass on, as described by Balfour, to form the intestinal branch of the vagus. In that intestinal branch we have an outflow of visceral fibres, quite comparable to, e.g. a splanchnic branch of the dorsal sympathetic system. The connection between the origin of the lateralis and this ventral commissure connecting the vagus roots in the dog-fish, and similarly the relation of the lateralis to the loops uniting the ganglia of the fifth, seventh, and tenth nerves in Petro- my zon, may probably be described as indicating a fusion in this region of the two great commissural systems which posteriorly are separate, viz. that of the sensory branches (lateralis) and the visceral or sympathetic. “We agree with Gaskell that the term sympathetic should be suffered to fall into disuse, as tending to perpetuate the old conception of the primary importance of the longitudinal nerve-tract ; whereas the leading fact is the metamerically recurring outflow of visceral fibres, which may or may not be united together by successive longitudinal commissures.” In the Nemertea this anterior ‘‘ fusion of the great com- vagus nerve and the Vertebrate ramus intestinalis vagi, of course, comes more closely within our reach. It need not be insisted upon that if these comparisons prove correct the separate intestinal nerve-systems (sympathetic nerve system) of other Invertebrates (Annelids, Arthropods, Molluses) cannot be looked upon as homologous with the sympathetic nerve- system of the Vertebrates, but would rather be homologous with that portion of the intestinal innervation of the latter which comes to the account of their cephalic nerves, in so far as these represent derivatives of the Nemertean vagus, and are marked » in figs. l and 2 of Pl. XLII. 640 A. A. W. HUBBECHT. missural systems”’ is foreshadowed at the point where brain- lobe, lateral stem, and “ vagus nerve ” meet, or rather diverge. It has been attempted in figs. 1 and 2 to indicate the points here alluded to in a general way, special comparisons being, on the grounds that have been stated, purposely avoided. If we now turn to Dohrn’s and Semper’s hypothesis we must recognise that no such satisfactory general comparisons are there possible. Even if we were inclined to accept the “ turn- ing over” of Geoffroy St. Hilaire, by which back and belly became exchanged, and to admit the brain-piercing cesophagus, regarding the Annelid supracesophageal ganglion and the ventral nerve-cord as respectively homologous to cerebrum and medulla, it must still be conceded that we have not then in any way before us a nerve-system offering as many points of comparison with the Vertebrate system as does that of the Nemertea. Concerning the Annelids we have no observations by which the cephalic ganglia and the cephalic nerves are so clearly foreshadowed, none which would throw light on the origin of the vagus, its connection with the nervus lateralis and with the anterior cephalic ganglia, none concerning the sympathetic system and its blending with the vagus system in the lowest Vertebrates, indications of which are even retained in the highest. Nor is the ventral nerve-cord of Annelids, with its undeniable double character and double origin a match, so far as comparison goes, for the Nemertean medullary nerve, with its transverse nerves preceding the spinal nerves of Amphioxus and the Cyclostomata. And if we are then asked to consider the lens of the Verte- brate eye as a modified ectodermal branchial invagination, as the outer portion of what was once a functional gill-slit,! we feel that the ground under our feet is becoming rather uncom- fortable, and that it is high time to reconsider whether all these ingenious speculations in which the most beautifully pliable hypothetical and unknown Annelids play a too conspi- cuous part should not be definitely abandoned, and a new 1 Dohrn, ‘Studien,’ x, p. 459, 1885. RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 641 departure made by those who are interested in the phylogeny of the Chordata. In due time arduous and detailed morpho- logical investigations on the Platyelminthes in general, and on the Nemertea in particular, may then lead us to more satis- factory conclusions than are the fata morgana that are so temptingly evoked before our eyes by the ingenious manipula- tions of the indefatigable founder of the first and foremost Zoological Station, when, following his lead, we find ourselves wandering in the barren deserts of that province of phylogeny in which he attempts to establish a close connection between Chordata and Annelida. All these considerations have induced me to give this rapid outline sketch of the degree of comparison which I hold to exist between Chordate and Nemertean (more especially Palzo- nemertean and Schizonemertean) nervous systems, although I am perfectly aware that there is a growing tendency among those authors at present occupied with questions concerning the morphology of the Vertebrate nervous system (Froriep, Baldwin Spencer, Beard, Cunningham, Kleinenberg, and many others) to accept Semper’s and Dohrn’s views of the Annelidan descent of Vertebrates. Wiedersheim, in the new edition of his ‘ Vergleichende Anatomie’ (1886), does not even hesitate to bring these results in their unripe phase before the more extensive public of students, and this generally in acquiescent terms. It is curious to see how, e.g. the quéstion of the cephalic nerves and their comparison to spinal nerves, that of the nerve-roots, the cephalic ganglia and their respective connecting trunks, have given occasion to the most diverse twisting and retwisting of the facts in order to bring out a fixed scheme or diagram, which might then be compared to what obtained in Annelids, and in which the highest degree of similarity between the respective somites might be obtained, thus establishing a preconceived idea of the Vertebrate ancestor as a most rigorously segmented animal. The value of these speculations has been already tested above, and I may be allowed once more to express my conviction that our com- parisons between the Chordata and their lower Invertebrate 64.2 A. A. W. HUBREOHT. predecessors may only be looked upon as in any way satisfactory so long as they remain on a very broad and general basis, and that any very special homology said to be demonstrated ought for that very reason to be more especially suspected.} For my part I believe that, along the lines above indicated, a comparison between Vertebrate and Invertebrate nervous systems will in future prove to be more fruitful, but I wish to repeat that for the present we can only indicate general points of coincidence between the two, and must rigorously refrain from making comparisons in detail. On the other hand, it is suggestive once more to consider what has been recorded in my ‘Challenger Report’ concerning the nervous system of Drepanophorus Lankesteri, when compared with that of certain Annelids; and we may, I be- lieve, safely come to the conclusion which was formulated by me seven years ago, but which I now hold to be much more solidly established, that we have in the Nemertea an important group through which definite glimpses may be obtained at the sources from which both Chordata and Appendiculata (Ray Lankester) have respectively sprung. The proposition first formulated by Gegenbaur, about the phylogenetic origin of the ventral nerve-cord and cesophageal ring of the Annelida out of ancestors with lateral cords, has obtained new support from the arrangement which was met with in the species just mentioned. And just as we have before tentatively discussed the question, in how far remnants of the lateral cords were retained in those descendants in which the median one had been raised to the dignity of a medulla spinalis (the Verte- 1 Bateson (loc. cit., p. 562) seems to take a similar view of the efforts here alluded to. He says: ‘“‘No doubt the cranial nerves may, by arbitrary divisions and combinations, be shaped into an arrangement which more or less simulates that which is supposed by some to have been present in the rest of the body, but little is gained by this exercise beyond the production of a false symmetry.”—Dohrn himself, whose suggestions have so largely contributed to the accumulation of all this conflicting evidence, is now rather in the position of Goethe’s Zauberlehrling, and writes (‘Studien,’ x, p. 468, 1885): “Auch auf diesem Gebiet (die Frage nach der Bedeutung der Hirnnerven) bildet die bisherige vergleichende Anatomie das Bild eines auf stiirmischer See steuerlos herumgeschleuderten Schiffes.” RELATION OF THE NEMERTEA TO THE VERTEBRATA. 648 brata), we might now consider whether any remnants of the median dorsal cord are retained in those descendants in which the lateral cords have differentiated into brain-lobes, cesopha- geal ring, and ventral cord (the Annelida). To this question I have no definite answer to offer, but I may call attention to the significant fact that the beautiful and exemplary investiga- tions into the embryonic development of Lopadorhynchus, very recently published by Kleinenberg,' have demonstrated the existence in the larva of that Annelid of a nerve-stem answering to the conditions here required. It is dorso-medially situated, it is anteriorly connected with the brain, or rather with a transverse nerve-tract (Kleinenberg’s prototrochal nerve- ring), which in its turn is connected with the brain,” it appears to be connected close to the anus with the ventral cord (the fused lateral stems), and though appearing in early larval life, and having only a temporary existence, it is regarded by Kleinenberg as having considerable physiological importance. If the light in which I am inclined to look at it is not deceptive, its morphological significance also can hardly be overrated. In closing this chapter of general considerations we may ouce more bring before our minds the proposition with which it was opened. We have here and in the foregoing chapters adduced facts and arguments which appear to speak in its favour; we will once more rapidly enumerate the common characteristics of Nemertea and Cceelenterata, as well as those of Nemertea and Chordata. The Ccelenterate characteristics that are also found in the Nemertea are the following : a. The presence of nematocysts in the _ proboscidian epithelium. b. The elaborate nerve-plexus in the integument, and its histological features. c. The presence of epiblastic muscle-fibres separate from the general body-musculature. 1 «Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zool.,’ Bd. xliv, Heft. i, ii, October, 1886, p. 107; pl. vii, fig. 27a. 2 For comparison with the Nemertea, cf. Pl. XLII, fig. 1. 644, A. A. W. HUBRECHT. d. The presence and the chemical constitution of a some- times very massive intermuscular jelly by which the other internal organs are at the same time surrounded. e. The mode of development of the mesoblast (at least in Lineus obscurus), which is less specialised than in most. other Invertebrates. f. The absence of any distinct enteroccele. The points of resemblance with the Chordata may be thus tabulated : a. The general features of the nervous system. b. The presence of a homologue of the hypophysis cerebri as a massive and important organ (the proboscis). c. The presence of tissues which may have become converted into the notochord (viz. the material of which the proboscidian sheath is built up). d, The respiratory significance of the anterior portion of the alimentary tract. At the base of all the speculations contained in this chapter lies the conviction, so strongly insisted upon by Darwin, that new combinations or organs do not appear by the action of natural selection unless others have preceded, from which they are gradually derived by a slow change and differentiation. That a notochord should develop out of the archenteric wall because a supporting axis would be beneficial to the animal may be a teleological assumption, but it is at the same time an evolutional heresy. It would never be fruitful to try to connect the different variations o ffered, e.g. by the nervous system, throughout the animal kingdom, if similar assump- tions were admitted, for there would be then quite as much to say for a repeated and independent origin of central nervous systems out of indifferent epiblast just as required in each special case. These would be steps that might bring us back a good way towards the doctrine of independent creations. The remembrance of Darwin’s, Huxley’s, and Gegenbaur’s classical foundations, and of Balfour’s and Weismann’s brilliant super- structures, ought to warn us away from these dangerous regions. INDEX TO VOL £XVIL NEW SERIES. Aniline dyes used in staining Bacteria, by Hankin, 401 Antedon rosacea, symbiotic alge in, by P. H. Carpenter, 379 Anthea cereus, chromatology of, by MacMunn, 573 Bacteria, aniline dyes used in stain- ing, by Hankin, 401 Benham on Criodrilus lacuum, 561 », studies on Earthworms, No. i, 77;..No. TE, 561 Bourne, G. C., on the anatomy of Fungia, 293 Carpenter, P. H., on symbiotic alge in Antedon rosacea, 379 Chelonia, germinal layers of, by Mit- sukuri and Ishikawa, 17 Chromatology of Anthea cereus, by MacMunn, 573 Criodrilus lacuum, by Benham, 561 Criodrilus lacuum, by Orley, 551 Ctenodrilus parvulus, nov. spec., by Robert Scharff, 591 Cunningham on reproductive elements of Myxine, 49 Bs review of Dohrn’s in- quiries into the evolution of organs in the Chordata, 265 Dinophilus gigas, by Weldon, 109 Dohrn on the evolution of organs in the Chordata (review), 265 Earthworms, studies on, by Benham, No. II, 77; No. III, 561 Kchinoderm morphology, No. X, by P. H. Carpenter, 379 Eyes of Molluscs and Arthropods, review of Patten’s memoir on, 285 Fowler on anatomy of Madreporaria, 1 Fungia, anatomy of, by Gilbert C. Bourne, 293 Hankin, new methods of using the aniline dyes for staining Bacteria, 401 Harmer on the life-history of Pedi- cellina, 239 Hartog, liberation of the zoospores in the Saprolegniex, 427 Heape on the development of the Mole (Talpa), 123 Hubrecht on the relations of the Nemertea and Vertebrata, 605 Ishikawa and Mitsukuri on the ger- minal layers of Chelonia, 17 Lacertilia, pineal eye of, by Spencer, 165 646 Lendenfeld on the function of nettle- cells, 393 Liver, nerves of, by Macallum, 439 Macallum on the uuclei of striated muscle-fibre in Necturus, 461 », onthe termination of nerves in the liver, 439 MacMunn on the chromatology of Anthea cereus, 573 Madreporaria, anatomy of, by G. H. Fowler, 1 Mitsukuri and Ishikawa on the ger- minal layers of Chelonia, 17 Mole, development of the, by Heape, 123 Muscle-fibre, nuclei of, in Necturus, by Macallum, 461 Myxine, reproductive elements of, by Cunningham, 49 Nemertea and Vertebrata, relations of, by Hubrecht, 605 Nerves, termination of, in the liver, by A. B. Macallum, 439 Nettle-cells, function of, by Dr. R. v. Lendenfeld, 393 Orley on Criodrilus lacuum, 551 Patten on the eyes of Molluses and Arthropods (review), 285 Pedicellina, life-history of, by Sydney F. Harmer, 239 INDEX. Peripatus, development of, by Adam Sedgwick, 461 Petromyzon, development of, by Shipley, 325 Phytophthora infestans, life- history of, by H. Marshall Ward, 413 Pineal eye of Lacertilia, by Spencer, 165 Saprolegniew, liberation of zoo- spores in the, by Hartog, 427 Scharff on Ctenodrilus parvulus, 591 Sedgwick on the development of the Cape species of Peripatus, 461 Shipley on the development of Petro- myzon, 325 Smith, W. Robert, on the ammoniacal decomposition of urine, 371 Spencer on the pineal eye of Lacer- tilia, 165 Talpa, development of, by Heape, 123 Urine, ammoniacal decomposition of, by W. Robert Smith, 371 Vertebrata and Nemertea, relations of, by Hubrecht, 605 Ward, Marshall, on the life-history of Phytophthora infestans, 413 Weldon on Dinophilus gigas, 109 PRINTED BY ADLARD AND SON, BARTHOLOMEW CLOSE. na re WVU Date Due POE me Pol ee ee penne ee OED ire Dg eee renw