CINCINNATI, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 1860.

;b;.ti-

Tl... parry

HON. F. P. STANTON — HIS OIMMON

The republicans of St Louis held

:>.u-.u-j r.i.-'t.t;:' --n Monmtv d.-nii

k,- in Kan-

efforts of the De-

i.j.j.m-. (-.in (,, (be lll'liri Of the [,e,i

tlie ii\!o]'(l Inni'ii, :iTiil finally oi Jus •.■I'lL-Hj.iiiiuu- .'\piiKinn hom ulliei-, lor fusing to be a party to the pro-slavery conspiracy. In the course of his spt which was throughout marked with dor, deep sincerity, and truth, and i

1 inti-il Stiil.-* li:>vift;-itatn»t Hit peace of the -hall bepunisliol L> ■ :i tie tranquility of wir tine not excelling \,9€>\State* to setrct their thousand dollnr*. and'crtls where,,, r-itw-ut

mi- [ ■ ■ ; - - 1 1 - 1 r •mv./ivu.'oty i,. }„ a- ■ :nl.,.,]i,d in il,,. lCrin-,-

'ifouglns

,i;;":,

|irirri[.|,-. I,.- „■:,;(, l ;,„; !.. li:ll , ,.-,,i,. t„ ( ii:u-

Ifrtton at all. Be Bh'ould have boiated the -i^ikI.ii,! oi tr.u- Democracy, and defied the l'hMr.,-1,,:, Ikci.-Cimv. :ind thin, /;- utl.m.-n,

i-i.nfr tii- j..vt\ I tol-l him thnt they would

- »-. ll() Irlke I. IV 1 )vi,-. . hut I W.'.H .■'Jm-n i

■ tnid last lie .lijrs> iiv.-t tin* ..i:tr,iirt. r,-, J

M III.' J)mn(,ta icent rraiclin.j imrh iutu n

.<-„- .Jitny./j),]

Cnti,ti:uti<.n. ^.im. .1. Douglas" l.-tt-T :»o-

wTran^c^td?"*™0*^''"^™0-1"^"

b-u.li-f hv |,„lii,, ,1 I'nnv-ntioiiH. Tlir 1'i.m- L'k.s |'.rty. th- Up, ■V.iirl.Jge, the Ji-U and

.,-„:(!...) t.. -HV ft'IVHlll:U' ..f til.-- tVi.LI.]- — tin-

Ueruoerary that

iloi'-e such .-entimont.s — I r.mmhm,. th. in as a violation of every principle uf ui.-m'.- bett-r nature, of th-- -pint uf the Kviai/i tiun oi Independence, and o{ the law.- ot

1 Icm- looked upon this cm,

lo'ih',', in a'ilm .Wil^mi.i 'il';.ii,.| ihe SmuiI,, „,id tin- ■ the North, and thus lonu t

THE NEW • PKOPEIlTVIS.il."

Before adopting the new doetrini on the subject of" property," as pro pounded by the Administration part e there is one view ofit which its north ern apostles may as well look at twice When, these gentlemen insist upoi hnvingshives placed in the same eate gory witli horses and oxen, and cal upon the country to concede that tin C'r>ri«titutii.n treats them as "prop' orty," tliey either do not mean what they say," or they mean more thar they say. A horse is a horse ii Miiiiiu as well as in South Carolina Tlie Massachusetts oxeu stand just !is much in need of an owner as ihi--.

genu

the

the Union. When one of the chiv- alry brings a mule to New York, the

w York law will judge of his riirbt it. hv the law of the State in which acquired it, and will protect him the enjovnit.'ht "t" it aec,.,nl i ol! U is not to the Territories ot the United States alone that a Southerner may carry his ox or his ass, with the " "nty of being protected in the peaceable possession of it. It is not Arizona or Kansas alone that tin- law watches over his flocks and herds lie may cany them into any part of the Union, any State law to the eon- trary notwithstanding. If a South- came to New York with a cow, mid have nothing to fear from iof the State Legislature declar- ing that all cows should be allowed l wild, and that from the mo- ment they crossed the border, the pner should be deemed to have lost I title t'.i them. \YV presume there in be little doubt as to what the decision of the federal court-- would be as to the effect of such a law upon the rights of cow proprietors. They would hold it to be clearly unconsti- tutional and Void as tar as ,\ affected citizens of other States, whether t he- State courts declared it to be so with regard to their own citizens or not, and their protection to property in cows would certainly not be confined

be restricted to

rnUeiTshifeS.

it recognizes a

the supreme law of the Ian

other words, in all the Stat.

Union; so that all the-Sfci

abolishing slavery are and i

OAS bo property att ill protect their

S'wher'ev'i-

If t

tho United Stat to bo property, things, not pera this means that all the States 1 bound themselves solemnly to sider them property also, and clothe them with all the iucid of property, and not to pass any fixing upon them a different cha ter, or depriving any citizen of right u> hold them.

This is precisely what is mi

re properly

under tho Constituti

not dn to attempt tort at ion uf the Constitution on this p< lii'ire than any other. l<> a particular porli-m ufthe'Uhion. The Northern

make up their minds to recognisi.-

urn the North inexplicit terms, ih'm [inner, to deny the validity ■ -l' 1 Il--j r ti-slavery laws, to declare that ivcs may he hell a! this moment Ma — acini'-i'lN hv a title as iich-

States, when they gave in dhesiou to the Constitution. themselves ami their poster- ity to preserve slavery as long as the Union should last; that anything ; of this is treasonable, perfid- and fatal to the confederacy, o task of getting voters in the States for Breckinridge, upon

tin subjects. is :lj_ 'bore is nd time.

iper of Northern

ANOTUEK 9UDCAP.

W. W. BoYtiE.late Democratic rnem- l.er of Congress Iron, South Caroliua,

from

if not all, then m

mosfl direct means." you really thought

■en in South Carolina, iud you propose can

nobody at the North A at your madcap

ind trickery of such braham Lincoln is elected President,

sand: ami we hu\ a iarger tuiijori t ,■ over all, if the contemplated union is effected, than will be our plurality if each faction votes honestly tor it"

render the approaching canvass as

exciting as it will he important anu

uf the fact cms opposed to the Repub- lican party as the JlaraUi and it* as?.>- L'iales arc seeking to produce."

The followir

nf Salm.'ii Wide-Awa ight, on 1

tiVaU"l lawvi--

intelligent cri language, which conversation :

rah am Lincoln generally

i a talented and id showB himself by the following

i published debates of

; is the eloquent close base's address '.o the

?asion of their jubilee . of Frank Blair;

y generous svmpntliy iinJ cordnj pprceiatii.ns, ami. ;ri this spirit l..-r

Illinois Sure for Lincoln.— The

Chicago JviTimh of the lOtb, says. •■ The pri^j'ccts lor Lincolu in Illinois are hecouiing brighter every day The most cheering words come to a* from every county in the State. Where the Douglaaites have hitherto been the strongest, they are now becoming uvLtk and spiritless, loiin.^ their hru-k hone, losing their voters, losing everything. And Lincoln it gaining all the while— gaining what

■

THE RAIL SPLITTER

i II. .InlJDAN, » 1

I E. M. KEEIIAN, t t

CINCINNATI, SEPT'R 5, 1860.

ABRAHAM L I N C O L ]

HANNIBAL JI A M L I

dican State Convention at Spring- ,ois, June 17, 1858, winch opened i campaign of Hi at year. The I an -

inland candid man . be he of wliat-

What destroyed the

What den troyed the power of Hit party in the Free States i Sla< peal of the Missouri compromis

imore. And why? Thai swer, since their two platfo dly the same. And yet i

Court has decided t

Territories, and be protected there in ou right, either by the Territorial Legislature o

our platform." The northern or Dough

[ Mr. UougUx— which pledges the

fiijUr >>■■ " decided by the Su-

ho) thr hil,r<,ttlm;„lm,H,"y

ultra slavery pruprig/ueii.-t .

III.: Ureekenridge and Dunging platforms— m.1 even as to lime J for the latter is pledged to what has been {that is, to the Dre d Seolt deci- sion) as well as to what shall liereafttr !■■■ ,1,. nil.i! by 11..- Supreme Court. Where, then, i-

Now, suppose the people e wish, through then L.-giwlutiiri pn.hil.it Sluvry, and the Supi

tution upon Ter

jes not follow that Mr. Douglas, or initio party, or the people of the

tjf ili.- ciw'. Iiut they must submit

if that pro-slavery Court ;

pie of the Territories I insult to injury ? But

1 be a Democratic Presidt le Free Forth I will you i

Protest published on the last page of this paper. It is by Democrats, honest, sincere, and independent men. What they say in re- danger of submitting such important political questions to the decision of an irresponsible

would preserve her liberties I The Douglas papers in the Froe States will not publish th« llrdi.iiii.ii..: platform! They are afraid to lei

t platform and endorses it! Thousands re of honest Democrats — who are not

oily indifferent to the great interests of the

o are really opposed to its extension into ■ free Territories by Supreme Court decieei.,

that platform. How long,

yourselves lo b

best interests, merely to gratify aspiring <

: of these things ? Bernei

: and diffusion. If.

>.\..l Hi it I \« i T.i MUM-, hi,

>tniocriiK. „f ihe St-iU- of Uhlu. .igai-w. lain plunk in the new Doughs pl.ul.,1

.■h;eh eo : -nlt'i-,1 ntie ,.f iS-i.iu-l ..„-|.-.| , , ■

i Douglas and all

* S.ipivm. Con-- the utter annib .rythingiuthe.

Douglas. His reasons are g 1, and amply

sufficient; the ground he takes is that taken by all who support Doughs throughout the South. The following is the material portion of that address. Read it, Democrats of Ohio and the North Weat. It is not likely

Douglaa platform is that ^

called. I have never recognized, never will recognize, the right ol th body of people that can throw tl into a Territory, to keep out or by unfriendly legislation everybody who disagrees with them in opinion! I indorse tin? dootiiii..- i.l (j|,. .l.'ihTsun i 'itv pint- ' the Consti

It in supporting .Indgo Dung] regard myself :is hUui. toning

" );...,.!.l.l. That it with On? Cincinnati platform, that <!uri,>./

dd be respected by i d enforced with p

lidi'lity /■'/ ■:<:.'-!/ /,r,inrh

enforced with prompt-

(i.'iiei'nl HovernmenL'

toriis with <>nL pn.pi-i'iy, iind Unit < i- ■-'[<- 1 :l ! i.'ousiitinixi] restricts tlic Ti.- toi i.il Legislature Iiotn all Icgi.diiiivc i

j principle for us,

'" tho question 'he " " '

ding to that platform, tho--*f cot

forced by every branch ui tl Government Whatt restrictions are, is referred to the deci of the Supreme Court, created for purpose of deciding questions or c arising under the Cunstitnlion iuui i

plcte enjoyment.

igtslaturea] 1 under • of acceptance, co

lident of the United ise all the necessary .o so enforce and carry refoie, bound to con- clude that, whatever dilL-iem-i-io! opinion rimy exist between nouh.-in and sou thorn Deinocuits on the ali-ti.iet .|ii.-tion. pt.ie-

Such is the ground— and the only ground —on which the supporters of Mr. Douglas at the South advocate his election, and justify themselves. At the North the attempt is at ill

jrouud of " Popular Sovereignly and Helf-guv- arnment" in the Territories; but intelligent ind li..n.-t Deiiioeriils are beginning to nee

Territories— md that neith.T Con-r-ss nor a Territorial Legislature can proliil.il or abolish slavery in a Territory "—is not a decision, but merely the opinion of the Court upon points not legally before it for decision. Douglas himself, in two or three instances, attempted to gel out ol" the ditlioulty iu t hi.-.

with Lincoln, in 1858, and again last spring

by Jeff. Davis and others. But he failed in

both instances, and only made matters worse. Besidea, wo have Mr. Douglas on the record, and in such a way that he cannot escape. In a set speech, made in the Hall of the State House at Springfield, Ills., on the evening of June 12, 1857, and by invitation of the Grand Jury of the Supremo Court of the State, Mr. DoiighiH i-i-u.l, in regard lo the Died Sentt de-

" The Court did not attempt to avoid re- sponsibility by disponing of the Ca.-,e upon

lions not. properly b-lnie 1,1,'en,, :,i,.; . li c-.-e 1 1 v presented l.y tho record. Like hoiiesi and

e.-iiM-ieiiiion, judges, as r|lt-y are, they met :iud decided each point., tei it. iil'o-e, ainf faith- fully performed th.-ir whole duH', and no- tiling l-iil their duly, to the eounuy, |,y ,le- (.■rniining all tin- .pi. M.jon-, in the ease', and nothing i.ut what, was , .^enlial to the decision

plain, explicit, and covers the le ground— endorses the whole decision

11 it.-i l.oinl,. The ■:, 1, tl,,,,, „■),;,.],

This

111,,.

York Herald, July 3, 1S5; Slut? I(,yisUr of June 13.

gan of Mr. Dougk,, said, in regard lo tin- very matter, in its issue of Sept. 11, isl- and gave it as » the opinion of Senator Doug

, „■ |.V.I,-i:d the Ui me footing as any otlier

^torfaTlSi

!'■■■' ' ■ ■- ' ' :

alnvo property."

*ow hear what Mr. Benjamin, U. S. Sen-

r from Louisiana— say*, lie i^ regarded one of tin- iildent lawyera in Aiueriea. On

:;.„.! I<> l|,f utteiilpt lo gel rid

.'.jo. -tion- were not I.. f..iv th. I- '.hey u.r.- vi.tlrr ihO-t. )i]|..«

t)l.,i'.r ,Ui.i are „, ere passing .-aying- .■ii •, t!,:r.ni, o.,r. l.y , judge in theeour-e

r!,V,',V!- "*''"' That is unquestionably true. And that i

What did the Court decide? In the I9tb vol. of Howard's Repotfe (which are the offi- cial report* of tho Court) on page 395, we find what is termed a syllabus, that is, an

in the syllabus, and Mr. Benjamin, in the speech from which we have just quoted, said he had good authority for saying that that

self. But, if not prepared by him, it was by

and consent of Judge Taney. Two of those points— the 3rd and 4th— read as follows ;

:h.l. L:\ery citizen has a right to take with him into :J,e Territory any article of property which "he tW.ii.uJun of the United States

- 4th. The Constitution of the United

St:it.^ r-.-cigmzes slaves as property, and pledges the Federal Government to protect

■yllnl.ii-. ..fl.li self, then we Court, in its (

be said that this is mer ease, and not the deoisi< •eply that the decision c

i the point. The following is the lan- >f the Court — of Judge Taney himself e body of the decision. After show-

lerty, any more than it could with theirr if the Constitution recognizes tho rigfc* no distinction between that description

quentl/r

other

subject to the reflection of the reader. In his celebrated New Orleans apeech, Dec. 6, 1858, Mr. Douglaa said :

"The Democracy of Illinois, in the first

place, accept the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in tho case »f Dred

laves are property, and with all other kinds of

Constitution. In i

. ■ M iitiii.v wit), all other ki

Let no ■

the Dred Seott decision, in ite broadest and fullest sense. Let no one say either that he does not endorse the Wickliffu resolution in the Baltimore platform. He not only endorses it substantially in his endorsements of the Dred Scott decision, aa above shown— but he

And let uo Douglasite say again that Douglas

ereignty or self-government by the people of

the Baltimore Platfor

THE PLATFORMS.

ivo here the three Platforros-the Re

n, the lireckenridge, and the Dnuglo.'

anyUTe9rrIto^Vof the traited'Stato/' ^ -

(.'li:irl.-<l..>ii and re-ad..p(e.l

glit. (.... s.'Hl,. wild tli-ir property m 1.1 if T.i ■ [...ry. without their rights, either nf ]m..|'j...h

,.1:1,'r.-.-i..:i:.l ..r'T.-mloriul Lcui>l:iti..n. ■ I-I-.li it ,-.■.!.. ,n,i.y..l Hk. Federa v.,„-

in the Ter

"That when the setllera in a Territory, hav- ing :iri adequate | ....j . u 1 :il itm . form a M:il>- t/,.i,-

on an equal footing with the people of other

-States : ilu.I the fe'.ftH- Hi'.;- or^iniz- d ...ight l..

,,-,.-■■■! ii : Clmrh-jU.n » u ■ 1 tini=.b.-d

sion of the Supreme Cour

■ United States, should he respecl- i""and iVl.-hiy l>y every brunch of

Bi.ltimoR.-tlK'

d after that, we nsk every Donghr; IVmo- ;to carefully Borutinire and look through Douglas platform, and see how much

Popui

ynty

find

he can fool himself with the delusion tlv when he votes for that Platform, and the me

Sovereignty and the right of self-government

CHITTENDEN ON LINCOLN'S	ELEC-
Senator Crittenden, of Kentucky, has a
	Lincoln
light* of Keitt, Rhett, and Baniar
	t Louis-
ville,Ky.,hesaid:
.lM r,.p1,|,li,-,,oel il y.,i d- not lik
„l ,],. Il,:,j..rilj1 .il'i'Ji' ."11 I'- .-..'l.r..M,'.-,

DEMOCEACY WITH ITS TWO WINGS,

Tho old Democratic Hoostoi- has become so changed that his best friends scarcely know him.

j property. This inequality is always

laryoly into tho la-' I 'i-e= i^K- nt in.1 .^inp^u. the i,..-Hii.g of th.. Nati.-iml Democratic Con- porated in the Cincinnati platform. It waB

it. Few nt the North, we wiy, understood it. How many even now know what it means 'I

campaigns (if the Democracy succeeded in the pending one,;— perhaps not more than

disguised under the seemingly harmless of State equality, would show itself

Slate being sovereign within itaelf, in all

the Federal Government. But this " equality '

Government, and bus never been denied— con- sequently the phrase "State equality" conic

something else.

Til.- extract at Liu- head of this article

Bonce in this matter. "The free States are closed territory to the citizen of the South

with In- slave property." There's the point ! "While every slave Stuff is free to the citizen of the North with his property I" What an

i.l. nl, rippiiretitly, Hint he had just discovered this fact ! But, says he, "this inequality has

if the Democracy and t

State equality, you see; consequently tin free StuteH must be opened to the citizen o the South with his tlaw property!" That it just what is meant, and just what the Snull is aiming at. There can be no doubt of it

vlity, ood then-as Mr. Douglas 1 Scott decision has done— place

e States, arid protected h

A QUESTION.

On the 16th of last month Mr. Douglas made a speecti in Augusta, Maine. He had ivp'ab'.lly boasted during bis tour through

Ins speech in Augusta, a respeetaldo- gentle- man of the city, who had been introduced to him, and who occupied a seat on the stand ili, Id- the speeeh, handod him the following, which he carefully read, and placed in hia

■■Will ,lu.(ee |i,nigirH be bo kind as to

;gieeB,f!1.l0W„citizeL,j.Il)y.?tatine„

P.. •:■!■■ :

'■■.l.-r.il l.ll!,irn(i"ri. and notwithstanding

slavery therefrom?

" P.. you allinu that: the pcoplo of a Terri If.ry have Hi,. Omtfiifutionnl right to cruab

1 r\ r i | s ' i

■ ■ ■ ■:', ... ,|. ',','. , |' ,'„ !I.'(| ,!',., „V.,i'!'.v< authority ?"

Here was a question, you will perceh ■which came directly to the point. It embrac

«Tery Douglasite north of Mason and Diron's

themselves." We— Republicans— say Do'ity las itt a deceiver, and that all his honest sup- porters are deceived. He don't mean any such thing I If he does, why did he not answer

him ! If b. says " No "-the gr< the Northern Democracy would That is his position. Ho is an I

whioh will let the wind out of I sovereignty bauble I Mabb him a>

nder thuj head on our first page, and then recollect that Mr. Douglas and all who support him and the Dred Scott decision, aro in tho same category with Breckinridge and Lane and the Admin- istration party. Remember that in his New Orleans speech, Dec. 6, 1858, Mr. Douglas

' The Democracy

CASHMERE GOATS.

iin Mr. Williams, of Licking county,

or "property" into our State, to a matt which they, as well as most other peopl probably have not thought of. Can the goats be brought here and held us pr-r" without somo special act of tho Legislator.

1848.) that " slaves

And again, (in same Bpeeoll) : " Let me ask

law!" In his speech in the U. S. Senate Feb. 'ii, 18411, he repeals (ho same thing; and

■uy,; "1

other property without law to protect it ? '

Now, the point I wish, to get at is this : Ii negro slaves are properly, and "on an equal ity with all olber kinds of property," and ye'

•lse) without local law to protect it, how cni

"«quality with all other kinds of property,'

special law,— a law enacted specially f.u- i protection of that particular property. Tl is what Mr. Douglas menu*, because he cou

crty, on an equali then all other pro

neither can any < consequently Mr.

olusion must foil. It will not helj

Mr. Douglas had

mp..i-tikiit questions in his two spei here unless protected bythedocal 1

perty,"aud on an equal footing with all othe property? If slave property is on an equalit

REPUBLICANS, ATTENTION!

BACK NUMBERS.

FIFTY DOLLARS IN PREMIUMS.

PREMIUMS FOR DESIGNS.

«*««£<?. ^T^K? »^ "Ant X"!

AN IMPORTANT naOOMENT.

A PROTHsT

51 1- I'.. M oi- Mr.

Ey1nd

V:,T..".- ;■„■:.'

of Popular Sovereignty, si lUK-quivocul linns tn the d Suprt'inv Comt, virtually

J^iieliuil: :.U

question — in the 1:

shall be bound to call it a heresy

government which we

Revolution «nv !.iU-]:t, mid ,ip,,|i will- i

our (.i..'Vi.-ruuji.-iit is !otind*>d, and i! wil

ihrouL'li ii-> :'-^--i-.l df-purLiiiejiti. tin- last

spark oi I'opubu- tovert-inntv, and iv-duc,

to absolute subjection auy people who

Against tin.- l-^i-.jlutiou «<■ pretext, as

L.'tnt; ,n j h-n cv.n:!-,,d!ru...n to the pvin oiplee held and n .. i . . 1 upon bv the IX-rne,

We appeal to thai history, :.nd we m-

American Democracy to subi...: . i ....■:■

Federal Court

pact, differences oj opinion ]■;■■■-.. .;,.:.i ;

to the measure ot powers which shouh be conferred on tin.- treneia! oo\'<-ani..,,-iii It is known that the principles of th, States-righta men prevailed, in one e^en Ual particular, at least A record ol th:i triumph is to be found in thu 1ml, articl. of the amendments, which limits tin- ^.-i. eral Government in its openaion.-; to .=bel powers only as are delegated in the plaii t, expressly re Stai.M or th

lorces and endeavored to t^aw-- hv impli- cation, w!,,a h:,d bL-en emphsdiodly denied th.-t.i In 11,, letters: ol compact as amended They advanced cauliou;dy at iir,a,^;.ii,inj_-aliiih- i,< rennd :i litl let'

proposed and passed th- and sedition laws.

Kentucky resolutions c

°tfiH\33ffi 1BInoVn-

> Mr. Jams, dated Moi

.July S. ISii2, he said:

■;rridy mi.- the power, installed fo

■ iuli- to ■■<> authority 'W impeach

A;.:,^;,;,

, rhi.mas ],ii,-hu- d.o.,1 ,25, 1820, he said:

■ ..f the Urnt.,1 S:-lU*3 i, the

iter to Judge Johnson,

sappers and nine'.- nm.-Luiih uoikin-

ini," Wi ask T> [imk-w! I , L |

ii.iyjc thr-mr-i'-lvcs th.; question if they are witlim.' to make the Court the final arbiter lo decide what are, and what are not

■ .Supreme I 'our! ol tin- Oiited id enforced with promptness

On the Tih d;iv of July, 1-41, .Iiidu- Buch.;ui,m, (hen 'within tin- Democratic p:irty, dt-livei-.d a .-pe.-eit m tin- Senate oi (lie I. nici'dSl:*;.-. on tin- .'i av-i mil loin !; i , nl ill lint 1V. I 1 -ilk It had beer

",'~2 I 11 II 11 tl 1 1 1

friendly legi.-lat-iuii.' might exclude what the Supreme. Court uii.idil decide

2 on^ne atde^nterve'ntion^s on the

gulf ' , t0 , ;'_

are groundless, because: no *uch decision will bo or can be made. We do not know

bound to abide by the decision , Court

Suppose Mr. Dou-'las -hould become the next President of the Knitcd States and should adhere to ibis platform. Sup- pose dui-int: his admmi-rration this tion should come before the Com

Supreme Court

ifiddily the man oj the Court.

Congress will be bound to pass laws- lave, rode, if you please — to protect sh

ilion, ' or iocid polie,- re;;iil;ilK

ti,.-> ^i;;

Im-NH- |r.,t

hus we find by the inevitable opera- . of this new doctrine, the great chain- i of Popular Sovereignty himself might

l lunii: for d'-in.L- precisely

ffice of th

would be no avoiding

vishea to carry out his former _

Id be nothing; Popular Sovereignty

f the Court would be e»er:

e paralyzed; the energi*

If our present party er^ani/: ?nt to remain Keilerali/asl. ils it inevitably

-hall a.lopt 1

lo the IVlOo, , aesUlal all ■

i. I'll >, inert:

'. II SMITH I.. 'LAHKE 51. I.'AMSIA

KCi;::.-.:1,:::1:1;

claims for the highest office' :.,aln„ a'l

...' 0 \ ■'. t ! [

taato. Mr. Lincoln is not so old oa eit

. 11-11 o, 5T, U

Pre

to canvass a Mai. „,a„,,i M,.,.!,,,, a

Doujtlas l,.r tl„. r,ot...l Stal..a S.-nan t-.-tt. Corouallis ,a,i,t,.oi..[lor LaFaiolt,-. Lord Howes for tin- loilitia oolooil Washington . th, Austrian marshals' for

airihoii/.-.l Ales' II R. e eler or his scribe to sneer at Abraham Lincoln ? — N. Y Tribuni.

EEPD3LICANS, ATTENTION I

RAIL SPLITTEES' BADGE!

BAIL SPLITTER,

No. 00 West Fourth St., ClnclDnatl, 0

READjmS!^

RAIL SPLITTER

PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN

PICTORIAL PAPER,

ORIGINAL CUTS,

TERMS OF THE RAIL SPLITTER:

agio copy, ilurlne the camaalea X .fit)