Kw Matty, Pe a “pt ey he BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE EY ( ww Tf IE Sy OS Sy 4 Hu 5 nse Ley REPORT OF THE ANNUAL MEETING, 1937 (107TH YEAR) NOTTINGHAM SEPTEMBER 1-8 LONDON ‘ OFFICE OF THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION BURLINGTON HOUSE, LONDON, W.1 1937 ili CONTENTS. PAGE MEE EASHAND. COUNCIL, TO97—30 fy 1x ANNUAL MEETINGS : PLACES AND DATES, PRESIDENTS, ATTENDANCES, REcEIPTS, SUMS PAID ON ACCOUNT OF GRANTS FOR SCIENTIFIC PGRPOSES 5(TS3T—1O3"7)) sis et Amtek Ricks oj ohe. 0 lehelle) viel oie! sacl ele aiereiets xii NARRATIVE OF THE NOTTINGHAM MEETING ............0000000005 XVi REPORT OF THE COUNCIL TO THE GENERAL COMMITTEE (1936-37) .... XVili GENERAL 'TREASURER’S REPORT AND ACCOUNT (1936-37) .....-..-.- XXV1 RESEARCH COMMITTEES (1937-38) ...---- 0s eewe cere eee ee eee enee xliii RESOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (NOTTINGHAM MEETING) .... xlIViii THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS : The History of Evolutionary Thought as recorded in Meetings of the British Association. By Prof. Sir EDwARD POULTON, fo CLS TSE A DE ey Ne tee Pairk, Ee in mane ee I SECTIONAL PRESIDENTS’ ADDRESSES : Noise and the Nation. By Dr. G. W. C. Kaye, O.B.E. ...... 25 Recent Research in Chemotherapy. By Dr. F.L.Pyman,F.R.S. 57 Pleistocene History of the West Midlands. By Prof. L.J. Wits 71 pehersex Ratio.” By Prof. BOA. E. CREW. 55.55.06 sfsieus adil ofa, exer 95 The Changing Distribution of Population. By Prof. C. B. RA WUISEE Unt robe ater over! 6 Qcet soe Stedeeak SIA Teas a Dea es gO 115 Economic Research and Industrial Policy. By Prof. P. SarcANT RAPE NCES etnehe: eet sis eB! PUBS B I, Mg BALE Dt oO 129 Research in Engineering. By Sir ALEXANDER Grips, G.B.E., C.B., ESO Titel OTH: SI SIE. TERS RN ss Gche soa 151 Assam Origins in relation to Oceania. By Prof. J. H. Hurron, MOIR Beare ep cbs Saco eh eo ee PENS aietas o Secunia cho tie’ y «stor Moratckoad 161 Heat Production, Nutrition and Growth in Man—Some New Wiewssetby. Dr rb. POULTON a t501.- +s \gastnd Sat) Sera 185 Tests in Common Use for the Diagnosis of Colour Defect. By Des Wiarve CORLING 13 doy aati oe amas. (4 bt ee dee 207 The Modern Study of Plants in relation to Education. By Prof. EJS SALISBURY PP eRISe TCHR IRD ay EAN ek SRO A 227 The Informative Content of Education. By H. G. WELLs, RIE tReet ers on ers hee es Cie ere, bcaenena, SNe eau Ag 237i State Intervention in Agriculture. By J. M. Cale ............ 249 iv CONTENTS PAGE REPORTS ON THE STATE OF SCIENCE, ETC. .........000seeeeeeeee 265 SECTIONAI) AWRANSACIIONS y o.ys/-) cio. os o,ccfareic/ are ie et oioe teeta ee eae 333 CONFERENCE OF DELEGATES OF CORRESPONDING SOCIETIES ........ 446 EVENING Discourse: By Dr. R. E. SLADE ............5...s0ne 457 PHYSIOLOGY AS A SUBJECT OF GENERAL EDUCATION .............. 474 ELANNING (DEE IZANDI Ob) ISREDALN: = c's)» vo as «|e /olelert) siete nee 486 RADFORD MaTHER Lecture. By the Rt. Hon. J. Ramsay MacDona_p, PAC INE OBR Sir ods FL Abe ate $c loca eetde 6 ayach.e epee 500 Norman Lockyer Lecture. By Dr. R. E. MorTIMER WHEELER... 512 REFERENCES TO PUBLICATION OF COMMUNICATIONS TO THE SECTIONS 519 APPENDIX A SCIENTIFIC SURVEY OF NOTTINGHAM AND DISTRICT ............-. I ABST W's he femencushepag yey a leneee taf vances» etd VISE GREE ZEN MeN SRO eeh ae 113 PUBLICATIONS OF THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION ...........+.445 (At end) CORRIGENDA, SECTION G. PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. Page 153, lines 17, 18. Read ['The National Physical Laboratory] had already a total staff of approximately 548. It has now 724. SECTION I. PRESIDENT’S ADDRESS. Further work since Nottingham has shown a discrepancy between Benedict’s and DuBois’s results. Benedict’s results (Fig. 1, 2) are incom- patible with the variable combustion ratio, but are difficult to accept, because on the alternative theory of the constant combustion ratio an evolution of oxygen would be associated with an evolution of heat. DuBois’s results are compatible with both theories. Calculations on pp. 196, 197 of Cal. per litre of oxygen resulting from conversion, at rest, after food and in muscular work also conform to both theories so far as they relate to R.Qs. from about 0.72 to 1. Those results of DuBois, where there is a large change of rectal tempera- ture during the experiment, with a resulting large difference between * direct calorimetric ’ and ‘ eliminated ’ heat are uncertain and these form a large proportion of the results outside the theoretical limits for O. and Cal. in Fig. 3, and also account for the apparent similarity of the results of DuBois and Benedict mentioned on p. 191. Consequently there is no absolute disproof of the variable combustion ratio ; but the constancy of the CO, over the range of quotients among other things makes the constant combustion ratio more probable and basal metabolism is still best defined and measured by the CO, alone as indicated on p. 200 and the other deduc- tions from p. 200 onwards stand. It is hoped that a final discussion of this subject will appear in the Guy’s Hospital Reports. SECTION L. PRESIDENT’s ADDRESS. Page 242, line 30. For ‘ terrestrial ’ read ‘ territorial.’ BRITISH ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE. OFFICERS & COUNCIL, 1937-38. PATRON. HIS MAJESTY THE KING. PRESIDENT, 1937. Pror. Stir EpwarpD Poutton, D.Sc., LL.D., F.R.S. PRESIDENT, 1938. Tue Rr. Hon. Lorp RAYLEIGH, F.R.S. VICE-PRESIDENTS FOR THE NOTTINGHAM MEETING. Sir ALBERT BALL, J.P. Major T. P. Barser, D.S.O., LL.D., “TEAL SNA fel 2 The Rt. Hon. Lord BEtpPER, D.L., J.P. Sir W. J. Boarp, O.B.E. Sir HAaroLD BowDeENn, Bart., G.B.E. Alderman H. Bow es, J.P. Sir JULIEN Caun, Bart., J.P. The Very Rev. the Provost OF , SOUTHWELL (Archdeacon W. Cony- BEARE). J. H. Cooper. Alderman J. N. DERBYSHIRE, J.P. The Mayor or Lincotn (J. E. Forp- HAM). Judge G. M. T. Hirpyarp, K.C., D.L. men G. HOGARTH, (C. BiB: FuRGCS., 1D se: Alderman E. HUNTSMAN. Brig.-Gen. Sir EDwarD T. LE Mar- CHANT, Bart., C.B.E., D.L., J.P. The BisHopP OF SOUTHWELL (The Rt. Rev. H. Mostey, M.A., D.D.). Sir Louis PEARSON, C.B.E. Lt.-Col. N. G. Pearson, D.S.O., M.C. The Mayor oF Drersy (Mrs. PETTY). J- D> BEAVER | sr. W. G. PLAYER, J.P. | His Grace the DuKE oF PORTLAND, K.G., G.C.V.O. The Lorp Mayor oF NoTTINGHAM (Councillor A. E. PursEr, J.P.). Sir ALBION H. H. Ricuarpson, K.C. Lady RoBINSON. The SHERIFF OF NOTTINGHAM (Coun- cillor A. E. SAVAGE). The Rt. Hon. Lord TRENT. Sir BERNARD S. WriGurt, J.P. vi OFFICERS AND COUNCIL VICE-PRESIDENTS ELECT FOR THE CAMBRIDGE MEETING. The CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY | Alderman W. L. Briaes, J.P. (Rt. Hon. the Earl BaLDwWIN OF | The CHAIRMAN OF THE CAMBRIDGE- BEWDLEY, P.C., F-.R.S.). SHIRE County Councir (H. The VicE-CHANCELLOR OF THE UNI- FRANKLIN). VERSITY (Professor H. R. Dean, M.D., Master of Trinity Hall). Tht ee BO 1s eae = a The HicH STEWARD OF THE UNI- ; eens ix’ i Beak VERSITY AND OF THE Boroucu (His The Rt. Hon. Lord Farruaven, D.L. Grace the DuKE oF DrEvonsuireE, | W. A. H. Harpina, M.A. K.G., G.C:M:G., G.C.V.O., P.C.). W. W. PEMBERTON, M.B., B.Ch., J.P. The LorD LIEUTENANT OF CAMBRIDGE- Gir J. J. THomson, O.M., F.R.S SHIRE (C. R. W. ADEANE, C.B., J.P.). Sir F. GowLanpD Hopkins, O.M., F.R.S. The HicH SHERIFF FOR CAMBRIDGE- : SHIRE AND HUNTINGDONSHIRE (T, | Sif ALBERT SEWARD, F.R.S. PEAKE, J.P.). The Very Rev. the DEAN oF ELY (Very The Mayor oF CAMBRIDGE (E. SAVILLE Rev. LIonEL E. BLAcKBURNE, M.A.). PEck, M.A.). Rev. Prof. C. E. Raven, D.D. GENERAL TREASURER. Prof. P. G. H. BosweEtt, O.B.E., D.Sc., F.R.S. GENERAL SECRETARIES. Prof. F. T. Brooxs, M.A., F.R.S. | Prof. ALLAN FERGuson, D.Sc. SECRETARY. O. J. R. HowartH, O.B.E., Ph.D. ASSISTANT SECRETARY. D. N. Lowe, M.A., B.Sc. ORDINARY MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. Dr. F. W. Aston, F.R.S. Prof. T. G. Hixt. Prof. F. AVELING. Prof. G. W. O. Howe. Prof. F. BALFOUR-BROWNE. Prof. T. S. Moore. Sir T. Hupson BEARE. Prof. J. C. Puixip, O.B.E., F.R.S. Rt. Hon. Viscount BLEDISLoE, P.C., | Prof. J. G. SmiTH. G.C.M.G., G.B.E. W. CAMPBELL SMITH. Prof. R. N. RuDMOSE Brown. Dr. C. TIERNEY. Dr. W. T. CALMAN, C.B., F.R.S. | Dr. W. W. VauGcHan, M.V.O. Prof. F. DEBENHAM. Dr. J. A. VENN. Prof. W. G. FEARNSIDES, F.R.S. Prof. Sir GILBERT WALKER, C.S.I., Prof. H. J. FLEuRE, F.R.S. F.R.S. H. M. Hattswortu, C.B.E. Prof. F. E. WEtss, F.R.S. Prof. A. V. Hitt, Sec.R.S. Dr. R. S. WHIPPLE. J. S. WILson. EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. Past-Presidents of the Association, the President for the year, the President and Vice-Presidents for the ensuing Annual Meeting, past and present General Treasurers and General Secretaries, and the Local Treasurers and Local Secretaries for the Annual Meetings immediately past and ensuing. OFFICERS AND COUNCIL Vil PAST PRESIDENTS OF THE ASSOCIATION. Sir J. J. Tuomson, O.M., F.R.S. | Sir THomas H. Horranp, K.C.S.1., (1909). | K.C.LE., F.R.S. (1929). Sir OLIVER LopGE, F.R.S. (1913). ' Prof. F. O. Bower, F.R.S. (1930). Sir ARTHUR EvaANs, F.R.S. (1916-18). Gen. The Rt. Hon. J. C. Smuts, P.C., : C.H., F.R.S. (1931). Prof. Sir C. S. SHERRINGTON, O.M., : : ; R G.BE., FB. (1922). Sir F. GowLanp Hopkins, Pres.R.S. - | __ (1933). H.R.H. The Prince oF WateES, K.G., | ci, James H. Jeans, F.R.S. (19 : , ERS: (5934): D.C.L., F.R.S. (1926). | Prof. W. W. Warts, LL.D., ScD., Prof. Sir ARTHUR KEITH, F.R.S. (1927). | F.R.S. (1935). Prof. Sir Wmi1am H. Brace, O.M., | Sir JostanH Stamp, G.C.B., G.B.E., K.B.E., F.R.S. (1928). | D.Sc. (1936). PAST GENERAL OFFICERS OF THE ASSOCIATION. Prof. J. L. Myres, O.B.E., F.B.A. Sir FRANK SMITH, K.C.B., C.B.E., Sec.R.S. Prof. F. J. M. Stratton, D.S.O., O.B.E., M.A. HON. AUDITORS Dr. EzER GRIFFITHS, F.R.S. | Dr. R. S..WHIPPLE. HON. CURATOR OF DOWN HOUSE. Sir BucKsTON Browne, F.R.C.S. LOCAL OFFICERS FOR THE NOTTINGHAM MEETING. COMMITTEE. THE GENERAL PURPOSES COMMITTEE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOTTINGHAM. CHAIRMAN. Alderman Sir BERNARD S. Wricut, Kt., J.P. VICE-CHAIRMAN. Alderman H. Bowtes, J.P. LOCAL HON. SECRETARIES. J. E. Ricuarps (Town Clerk of Nottingham). H. A. S. Worttry, M.A., J.P. (Principal, University College, Nottinghani). ASSISTANT SECRETARY. J. W. Harvine, M.B.E. Vill OFFICERS AND COUNCIL LOCAL OFFICERS FOR THE CAMBRIDGE MEETING. LOCAL HON. SECRETARIES. C. H. Kemp. F. P. WHITE. A. TABRUM. E. N. WILLMER. LOCAL HON. TREASURERS. R. EDE. | R. H. PARKER. OFFICERS OF SECTIONS, 1937 ix SECTIONAL OFFICERS. A.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES. President.—Dr. G. W. C. Kaye, O.B.E. Vice-Presidents.—Prof. L. F. Bates, Prof. ALLAN FerGusoNn, Prof. E. H. NEVILLE, Prof. H. T. H. Piaceio. Recordey.—Dr. EzER GRIFFITHS, F.R.S. Secretaries —J. H. AWBERY, Prof. W. H. McCrea, Dr. D. M. WRINCH. Local Secretaries —N. Davy, H. G. GREEN. B.—CHEMISTRY. Pyesident.—Dr. F. L. Pyman, F.R.S. Vice-Presidents.—Prof. J. E. EASTERFIELD, Prof. F. S. Kippine, F.R.S., Prof. J. W. McBain, Prof. J. C. Pumip, O.B.E., F.R.S., Prof. R. Roprnson, iBeaikeoe rot. Hi. S7 DAYLOR: Recordey.—Prof. J. M. GULLAND. Secretavies.—Prof. J. E. Coates, Dr. H. J. T. Ertincuam, T. W. J. Taytor. Local Secretary.—Dr. J. B. Frrtu. C.—GEOLOGY. President.—Prof. L. J. WIxts. Vice-Presidents—Dr. H. H. Bemrose, Prof. J. W. Carr, Prof. H. L. HAWKINs, A. T. Merca.Fe, Prof. V. J. Novak, Dr. R. Ricuter, Prof. E. W. SKEATS, Prof. H. H. SWINNERTON. Recordey.—l. S. DOUBLE. Secretaries —B. HILTON BARRETT, W. H. WILCOcCKSON. Local Secretary.—S. G. Ciirt. D.—ZOOLOGY. President.—Prof. F, A. E. CREw. Vice-Presidents.—Prof. J. W. Carr, Prof. Ross Harrison, Dr. J. S. HUXLEY, Dr. D. G. J. vAN OorDt. Recovdey.—Prot. W. M. TATTERSALL. Secretary.—Dr. G. S. CARTER. Local Secretary.—E. J. W. BARRINGTON. E.—GEOGRAPHY. President.—Prof. C. B. Fawcett. Vice-Presidents—Dr. P. W. Bryan, Dr. C. FENNER, Prof. E. G. R. TAYLOR, Brig. H. S. L. WrntersorHam, C.B., C.M.G., D.S.O., Principal H. A. S. WORTLEY. Recordey—H. KInc. Secretaries —J. N. L. BAKER, Dr. R. O. BUCHANAN. Local Secretary.—K. C. EDWarDs. x OFFICERS OF SECTIONS, 1937 F.—ECONOMICS., President.—Prof. P. SARGANT FLORENCE. Vice-Presidents—C. BERRY, Prof. S. BLyTHEN, Dr. C. R. Fay, A. RaprForD, A. C. Roz, W. WEsson. Recordery.—Dr. P. Forp. Secretaries.—S. R. DENNIsoN, E. D. McCaLttum. Local Secretary.— A. RADFORD. G.—ENGINEERING. President.—Sir ALEXANDER GIBB, G.B.E., C.B., F.R.S. Vice-Presidents.—Prof. C. H. Burtierip, Prof. H. Corton, Prof. W. Cramp, R. M. Fincu, W. H. Hatve, Sir E. Jarpine, A. D. Puirips. Recorvdey.—Wing-Commander T. R. CAVE-BROWNE-CAVE, C.B.E. Secretaries —H. M. CLarkE, C. W. J. TAFFs. Local Secretary —R. G. ROBERTSON. H.—ANTHROPOLOGY. President.—Prof. J. H. Hutton, C.1.E. Vice-Presidents.—A. L. ARMSTRONG, Dr. J. ButtER, Dr. C. von FURER HAIMEN- DORF, J. HoRNELL, Prof. A. Low. Recordey.—R. U. SAYCE. Secretavies.—Miss C. FELL, K. H. JAcKson. Local Secretary —A. H. McDonatp. I—PHYSIOLOGY. President.—Dr. E. P. PouLton. Vice-Presidents—Dr. Cyrtt Banks, Dr. L. P. Lockuart, Prof. R. J. S. McDowa.tt. Recordey.—Prof. H. P. G1LpIne. Secretaries.—Prof. R. C. Garry, Prof. A. D. MACDONALD, Local Secretary —Dr. H. H. BARBER. J.—_PSYCHOLOGY. President.—Dr. MARY COLLINS. Vice-Presidents.—Dr. P. B. BALLARD, R. J. BARTLETT, Prof. T. V. Moore, Prof. H. T. H. Piacerio, Dr. R. H. THoutEss, A. W. WoLTERS. Recorder.—Dr. S. J. F. PH1Lpotrt. Secretaries—Dr. HILDA OLDHAM, Dr. P. E. VERNON. Local Secretary.—W. J. H. Sprott. K.—BOTANY. President.—Prof. E. J. Sarispury, F.R.S. Vice-Presidents.—Prof. T. A. BENNET-CLARK, Prof. H. S. HoL_pEn, J. Rams- me O.B.E., Hon. N. A. OrDE-PowLeErr (Chairman, Dept. of Forestry, es Recordey.—Dr. B. BARNES. Secretaries —Dr. G. Taytor, T. THomson, Dr. S. WILLIAMS. Local Secretarvy.—Miss D. BExon. OFFICERS OF SECTIONS, 1937 xi L.—EDUCATIONAL SCIENCE. President.—H. G. WEtts, D.LirtrT. Vice-Presidents.—Prof. C. M. ArTLEE, B. W. L. BuLkKELEy, Prof. F, CLARKE, G. D. DuNKERLEY, Sir RicHARD LivinestoneE, A. H. WHIPPLE, Principal H. A. S. WorTLEY. Recovdey.—A. GRAY JONES. Secretavies.—S. R. Humsy, N. F. SHEPPARD. Local Secretary.—Dr. M. M. LEwIts. M.—AGRICULTURE. President.—J. M. Cate. Vice-Pvesidents —Dr. G. A. CurRRIE, Prof. J. Henprick, Principal H. G. ROBINSON. Recordey.—W. GODDEN. Secretary.—G. V. JACKs. Local Secretary.—R. N. DOWLING. CONFERENCE OF DELEGATES OF CORRESPONDING SOCIETIES. Pyesident.—Prof. J. RITCHIE. Secretary.—Dr. C, TIERNEY. X11 ANNUAL MEETINGS TABLE OF Date of Meeting | Where held Presidents bel bt pom ie 1831, “Sept. 27. occ DY OVIO Mess gestases: fe aces Viscount Milton, D.C.L., F.R.S. ...... _ — 1832, June 1g ...| Oxford ...| The Rev. W. Buckland, F.R.S....... —_ — 1833, June 25 Cambridge .. ...| The Rev. A. Sedgwick, F.R.S. ......... _ — 1834, Sept. 8 ...... Edinburgh .. ...| Sir T. M. Brisbane, D.C.L., F.R.S. —_ —_ 1835, Aug. I0...... Dublin..... .-.| The Rev. Provost Lloyd, LL.D.,F.R. s. _ —_ 1836, Aug. 22...... Bristol..... .| The Marquis of Lansdowne, F.R.S. —_ — 1837, Sept. I1...... Liverpool ............ The Earl of Burlington, F.R.S.......... _— a 1838, Aug. 10 The Duke of Northumberland, F.R.S. _— — 1839, Aug. 26.. Birmingham . ...| The Rev. W. Vernon Harcourt, F.R.S. — —_— 1840, Sept. 17 Glasgow .... .| The Marquis of Breadalbane, F.R.S. — — 1841, July 20...... Plymouth . ...| The Rev. W. Whewell, F.R.S. «| 169 65 1842, June 23...... Manchester. ...| The Lord Francis Egerton, F.G,. ‘s. 303 169 1843, Aug. 17......| Cork........ ...| The Earl of Rosse, F.R.S. ........sces008 109 28 1844, Sept. 26...... York ..... .| The Rev. G. Peacock, D.D., F.R.S.. 226 150 1845, June 19__...| Cambridge... Sir John F. W. Herschel, Bart. ., F.R. ‘S. 313 36 1846, Sept. Io...... Southampton ...| Sir Roderick I. Murchison, Bart.,F.R.S.| 241 10 1847, June 23. ...| Oxford.......... ...| Sir Robert H. Inglis, Bart., F.R.S. 314 18 1848, Aug. 9 Swansea ....... ...| The Marquisof Northampton, Pres.R.S. 149 3 1849, Sept. 12.. Birmingham . .| The Rev. T. R. Robinson, D.D., F.R.S. 227 12 1850, July 21.. Edinburgh . .| Sir David Brewster, K.H., F.R.S....... 235 9 1851, July 2 Ipswich ...| G. B. Airy, Astronomer Royal, F.R.S, 172 8 1852, Sept. I ...... Belfast..... ...| Lieut.-General Sabine, F.R.S. ......... 164 10 1853, Sept. 3 ...... HpEdiilesnscsee ...| William Hopkins, F.R.S........... 141 13 1854, Sept. 20...... | Liverpool . ...| The Earl of Harrowby, F.R.S 238 23 1855, Sept. 12...... Glasgow ....... .| The Duke of Argyll, F.R.S. ............ 194 33 1856, Aug. 6 ...... Cheltenham . ..| Prof.C.G.B.Daubeney, M.D.,F.R.S. . 182 14 1857, Aug. 26...... Dublin.......... .| The Rev. H. Lloyd, D.D., F.R.S. .... 236 15 1858, Sept. 22 Leeds ..... Richard Owen, M.D., D. G L., F.R.S. 222 42 1859, Sept. 14.. Aberdeen ‘| H.R.H. The Prince Consort ...... A 184 27 1860, June 27 Oxford .| The Lord Wrottesley, M.A., F.R.S. ... 286 21 1861, Sept. 4 ...... Manchester. ..| William Fairbairn, LL.D., F.RSS....... 321 113 1862).Oct. Xi jier <>: Cambridge ............ The Rev. Professor Willis, M.A. ,F.R.S. 239 15 1863, Aug. 26...... Newcastle-on-Tyne | Sir William G. Armstrong, C.B., F.R.S. 203 36 1864, Sept. 13...... Bathe Separcteesconsasee Sir Charles Lyell, Bart., M.A., F.R.S. 287 40 1865, Sept. 6 ...... Birmingham .........| Prof. J. Phillips, M.A., ite, D., F.R.S. 292 44 1866, Aug. 22...... Nottingham .........) William R. Grove, Q.C., F.R. S. aweee 207 31 TSO7 OCDE A iecess Dundee ......... ...| The Duke of Buccleuch, K.C.B., F.R.S 167 25 1868, Aug. 19 Norwich ....... .| Dr. Joseph D. Hooker, F.R.S. ......... 196 18 1869, Aug. 18......| Exeter Prof. G. G. Stokes, D. G Do LED Ss ecos 204 21 1870, Sept. 14......| Liverpool . Prof. T. H. Huxley, LL.D., F.R.S. ... 314 39 1871, Aug. 2 Edinburgh Erek. Sir W. Thomson, LL.D.,F.R.S. . 246 28 1872, Aug. 14...... Brighton Dr. W. B. Carpenter, F. Se aucauseace ck 245 36 1873, Sept. 17...... Bradford Prof. A. W. Williamson, F. oe 212 27 1874, Aug. 19...... Belfast Prof. J. Tyndall, LL.D., F. 162 13 1875, Aug. 25...... Bristol Sir John Hawkshaw, F.R.S. 239 36 1876, Sept. 6 ...... Glasgow Prof. T. Andrews, M.D. vie 221 35 1877, Aug. 15...... Plymouth ...| Prof. A. Thomson, M Ds, 173 19 1878, Aug. 14...... ublin....... .| W. Spottiswoode, M.A., 201 18 1879, Aug. 20 Sheffield ...| Prof. G. J. Allman, M.D. 184 16 1880, Aug. 25.. Swansea .| A. C. Ramsay, LL. D., F, 144 Ir 1881, Aug. 31.. Workieeec Sir John Lubbock, Ba art. 272 28 1882, Aug. 23 Southamp rt. C. W. Siemens, F.R, 178 7, 1883, Sept. I9...... Southport ...... Prot. A. Cayley, D.C.L., 203 60 1884, Aug. 27...... Montreal ...| Prof. Lord Ravlcieh, F.R.S 235 20 1885, Sept. 9 ....-. Aberdeen .| Sir Lyon Playfair, K.C.B. 225 18 1886, Sept. 1 ...... Birmingham . ...| Sir J. W. Dawson, C.M.G. 314 25 1887, Aug. 31...... Manchester .| Sir H. E. Roscoe, ’D.C.L. 428 86 1888, Sept. 5 ...... BACH ceca seenettes se Sir F. J. Bramwell, F.R. 266 36 1889, Sept. I1...... Newcastle-on-Tyne | Prof. W. H. Flower, C.B. 277 20 1890, Sept. 3 Leeds .........0.ce0000+ Sir F. A. Abel, C.B., F.R. 259 21 1891, Aug. 19......| Cardiff .. .| Dr. W. Huggins, F. RSs 189 24 1892, Aug. 3 ......| Edinburgh . Sir A. Geikie, LL.D., F. RS. 280 14 1893, Sept. 13 ...| Nottingham . .-| Prof. J.S. Burdon Sanderson, F. 201 17 1894, Aug. 8 ...... Oxford ....... ...| The Marquis of Salisbury, K. Ge 327 21 1895, Sept. I1...... Ipswich .... .| Sir Douglas Galton, K.C.B., F. 214 13 1896, Sept. 16...... Liverpool : Sir Joseph Lister, Bart., Pres, 330 31 1897, Aug. 18...... Toronto . -| Sir John Evans, K.C.B., F.R.S. ...... 120 8 1898, Sept. 7 ...... Bristol Sir. W. Crookes, FURS). .cleccssvecceeneee 281 19 1899, Sept. 13...... OVER cecsieceresseaos- Sir Michael Foster, K.C.B., Sec. R.S. ... 296 20 * Ladies were not admitted by purchased tickets until 1843. + Tickets of Admission to Sections only. [Continued on p. xiv. ANNUAL MEETINGS xiii ANNUAL MEETINGS. | | Sums paid 1) 0 New pease anor on account Annual | Annual avitee Ladies Foreigners Total x fc of Grants Year Members | Members Ti ant A for Scientific Purposes = a a = i 353 ns 1831 ==) = = er = = — = 1832 — | _ co == = goo = = 1833 _— — _ —_ _ 1298 _ £20 0 0 1834 — —_— _— _— — —_— — 167 0 0 1835 — —_— —_ —_— — 1350 = 435 0 O 1836 | = —- == = =! 1840 — 922 12 6 1837 | — —_ | _ I110* _ 2400 a 32. 2 .2 1838 [es Se |S = 34. «=| 1438 _— 1595 11 0 1839 | | — — | — — 40 | 1353 —_ 1546 16 4 1840 | | 46 3r7. | — 60* — | 891 — 1235 Io II 1841 | 75 BO, |. 33h 331* 28 | 1315 = 1449 17 8 1842 71 185 | — 160 == _— _ 1565 10 .2 1843 45 190 | gt 260 _ — —_ 981 12 8 1844 94 22 lass .407, 172 35 1079 — 831 9 9 1845 65 39 | 270 196 36. | 857 = 685 16 0 1846 197 40 | 495 203 53 1320 | = 208 5 4 1847 54 25) 1) °376 197 15 819 | £707 0 0, 275 1 8 1848 93 33 | 447 237 22 1071 963 0 0 159 I9 6 1849 128 42 510 273 44 1241 1085 0 Oo 345 18 o 1850 61 47 244 I4I 37 710 620 0 Oo Zorg 7 1851 63 60 Brom )\") Zg2 9 1108 1085 0 oO jon 6: 7 1852 56 57 367 |" 236 6 876 903 0 0}| 205 0 Oo 1853 121 121 765 524 10 | 1802 | 1882 0 o 380 I9 7 1854 142 IOI | 1094 543 26 2133 23nt 100)0 480 16 4 1855 ie 104. 48 | 412 346 9 III5 1098 0 0O| 73413 9 1856 | 156 120 | goo | 569 26 | 2022 2015 0 0. 50715 4| 1857 ; rrr | gr 710 509 13 | 1698 I93I 0 O 618 18 2, 1858 125 179 1206 821 22 | 2564 2782 0.0 684 11 I 1859 177 59 | 636 463 47 1689 | 1604 0 Oo 766 19 6 1860 184 =| 125 1589 | 791 15 3138 3944 0 O| IIII 5 10 1861 150. | 57 433 | © 242 25 I161 1089 0 0} 1293 16 6 1862 154 209 1704 | 1004 25 3335 | 3640 0 0} 1608 3 10 1863 182 103 111g | «21058 13 2802 | 2965 0 o| 1289 15 8 | 1864 215 149 766 | 508 23 1997 2227 0 0| 1591 710| 1865 mars) | 05 | g60 | 77% II | 2303 2469 0 © 175013 4, 1866 ries, © eek) 1163 771 7 | 2444 2613 0 0| 1739 4 0| 1867 226 | 117 720 | 682 45t | 2004 2042 0 ©O|} 1940 0 O 1868 229 | 107 678 600 17 | 1856 | 1931 0 o| 1622 0 O 1869 303 195 II03 gio 14 | 2878 | 3096 0 O| 1572 0 o | 1870 3II | 127 976 754 21 | 2463 | 2575 0 O| 1472 2 6 1871 280 | 80. | 937 gr2. | 43 | 2533 | 2649 0 0! 1285 0 o| 1872 237 4 oo. | 796 6or | II | 1983 2120 0 0. 1685 0 0o| 1873 232 | Ca | Sr Ait, 6303-4 | 12 Ig51 1979 0 O,| II5I 16 0} 1874 307 93 884 | 672 17 2248 | 2397 0 0| 960 0 Oo 1875 331 185 | 1265 | 712 25 2774 | 3023 0 O| 1092 4 2 1876 238 | Cam | 4406 283 Il 1229 | 1268 o o| 1128 g 7) 1877 fezoo. | | 93 1285 674 «| 17 2578 | 2615 0 O | 725 16 6 1878 239. | Cs | 529 349 13 | 1404 1425 0 ©. 1080 If II 1879 er | 41 389 47.) | 12 gI5 B99 GO TOC) fan 7 7. 1880 313 176 1230 Brae 24 | 2557 2689 0 o| 476 8 xr| x88r | 253 79 516 189 | 21 1253 1286 o 0o| 1126 rirj 1882 }) 330 323 952 841 5 2714 | 3369 0 0| 1083 3 3| 1883 317 219 | 826 74 26 & 60H.§ T7797), TBSF lwo | 1173, 4 0 1884 332 122 1053 ARGO) 3 6 2203 | 2256 0 0} 1385 0 0 1885 nM 428 179 1067 429 II 2453 | 2532 0 0} 995 0 6 1886 510 244 1985 493 g2 3838 | 4336 0 o| 1186 18 o 1887 399 100 639 509. | 12 1984 | 2107 0 0| 151r 0 5| 1888 412 113 1024 579 | 21 2437 2441 0 O| 1417 O11; 1889 368 92 680 334 12 L775 le For 0 60 789 16 8} 1890 341 152 672 tal a | 35 1497 1664 0 0} 1029 10 0 | 1891 413 I4r | 733 439 50 2070 2007 0 0, 864 10 0| 1892 328 57. | 773 268 17 1661 1653 0 O| 907 15 6 1893 435 | 69 | 94% 451 77 2321 2175 0 0] 583 15 6 1894 290 | Chea 493 26r | 22 1324 | 1236 0 O 977 15 5| 1895 | 383 139 «6©|~=—(1384 873 41 3181 3228 o ©O| 1104 6 I 1896 } 286 | 4125 682 roo | 41 1362 | 1398 © © | 1059 I0 8 1897 | g27. | 96 1051 639 =| 33 2446 2399 © O| I212 0 O 1898 | 324 | 68 548 120°" | 27 1403 | 1328 O O/| 1430 14 2 1899 ir: aa | t Including Ladies. § Fellowsof the American Association were admitted as Hon. Members for this Meeting. [Continued on p. xv. Xiv Date of Meeting 1900, Sept. 5 1gor, Sept. I1...... 1902, Sept. 10...... 1903, Sept. 9 ...... 1904, Aug. 17.. 1905, Aug. 15 1906, Aug. 1 .. 1907, July 31 1908, Sept. 2 1909, Aug. 25 1910, Aug. 31...... Igti, Aug. 30...... 1916, Sept. 5 I9I7 1918 1919, Sept. 9 1920, Aug. 24...... 1921, Sept. 7 1922, Sept. 6 1923, Sept. 12...... 1924, Aug. 6 1925, Aug. 26.. 1926, Aug. 4 1927, Aug. 31 1928, Sept. 5 1929, July 22 1930, Sept. 3 1931, Sept. 23...... 1932, Aug. 31...... 1933, Sept. 6 1934, Sept. 5 1935; Sept. 4 1936, Sept. 9 ...... 1937, Sept. 1 ANNUAL MEETINGS Table of Where held Presidents Ode PSragiond. Wwe c amuxeaaee etiam Ask: Monk oe 1936 : ; : : ‘ 273 +. 13k 1037 : . . . . 443 “Dew Total ‘ ; : Senf l 940. toy gk There is also a debtor sum due this year, although not forthcoming until next year, which should properly fall into the Contingency Fund, bringing it up to £2,000 or a little more. It was not thought necessary, in practice, to credit more than these available balances to the Contingency Fund each year, since this would merely have created artificial adverse balances on the general accounts of receipts and expenditure. As for the resolution that ‘ not more than £400 should be spent annually from general funds on grants for research,’ the average annual expenditure under this head has been approximately £323, on account of grants made being unclaimed. As I am reviewing the results of the financial report of 1932, I should perhaps recall that the Council then expressed the view that ‘ the true function of the Association, in making grants to research committees, is the initiation of particular pieces of research rather than their quasi- permanent endowment.’ The General Committee adopted this view, with the proviso that it ‘ should not be held to preclude [quasi-permanent] grants to institutions at which successive researches are to be carried on under research committees of the Association.’ It does not appear that the destination of grants has been materially affected by this expression GENERAL TREASURER’S REPORT XXVil of policy. A chart which I have caused to be prepared shows that from 1919 (and in fact earlier) initiation rather than quasi-permanent endowment was actually the object of the larger proportion of our grants ; but in 1931 the sum devoted to quasi-permanent endowment for the first time exceeded that of other grants, and this practice has continued each year since that date. There seems to be a good case for separate endowment of such quasi-permanent research committees, for they are undoubtedly doing excellent work. I have now proposed, and the Council has recommended, that the Contingency Fund should be maintained at a sum of about £2,000, except in any year when receipts should be abnormally low, and, further, that inasmuch as the existing Contingency Fund is earmarked for grants in aid of research, any excess of income over expenditure on general account should be used for the creation of a second fund for contingencies not connected with such grants. The Herbert Spencer Trust was wound up during the past year, and the Spencer Bequest to the Association amounted in aggregate to £1,241, as stated in the Report of the Council to the General Committee, par. VIII. In that report it is indicated that a sum of £500 has been definitely allocated, and the accounts herewith show that a part has been spent, for purposes connected with Down House, while a sum of {100 was voted contingently for another purpose during the ensuing financial year. The will prescribed the expenditure of the whole bequest within five years of the winding-up of the trust, that is to say, by November 1941. The purposes for which the bequest may be expended give the Council a wide discretion, and for the moment I do not propose to make any definite recommendation as to the disposal of the balance. On the incorporation of the British Science Guild into the British Association, a capital sum of £3,431 was handed over to the Association, and will yield an annual income of about £100. Life Fellows of the Guild were admitted to life membership of the Association without further pay- ment; but life members of the Guild were offered life membership of the Association on payment of the difference of fee (£5 ros.), with the result that our life membership fund has been augmented by the sum of £99. We assume the maintenance of the Norman Lockyer and Alexander Pedler Lectures, which were founded by the Guild ; and the fees and other charges in connection with these, excluding printing, are estimated to amount to about £35. Lastly, I have gratefully to acknowledge the gift of £250 from Mr. G. Radford Mather, a life member since 1901, for the purpose of establishing a Triennial Lecture on Recent Advances in Science and their relation to the Welfare of the Community. P. G. H. Boswe tt, General Treasurer, b2 XXVIil Oorresponding Figures 81st March, 1936. ae ds 38,687 10 11 9,790 6 11 68 14 7 1,354 65 10 182 18 10 GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT LIABILITIES Bohn Buf GENERAL PURPOSES :— Sundry Creditors . : : : 169 12 6 Hon. Sir Charles Parsons’ gift (£10,000) and legacy (£2,000) . 12,000 0 0 The late Sir Alfred Ewing’s legacy 500 0 0 British Science Guild: Capital Fund 3,431 9 1 Bequest of Jaakoff Prelooker . . 10 0 O Yarrow Fund As per last Account £5,115 6 4 Less Transferred to In- come and Expendi- ture Account under terms of the gift . 370 10 3 ——— 4,744 16 1 Life and Corporate Compositions As per last Account 2,891 2 2 Add Received veg year. : 277 10 0° 3,168 12 2 Less Transferred to In- come and Expendi- ture Account : 30 0 3,138 12 2 Contingency Fund As per last Account 1,497 7 6 Add Amount trans- ferred from Income and Expenditure Account r ‘ 443 9 7 nee CA se Accumulated Fund b : : . 16,488 9 0 SPECIAL PURPOSES :— Caird Fund Balance at Ist April, 1936 . 4 9,790 6 11 Add Excess of Income over Expendi- ture for the year . : : 1 81 Mathematical Tables Fund Balance at Ist April, 1936 . : 68 14 7 Receiptsfrom Sales. 4 F fo 8 Cunningham Bequest Fund Balance at Ist April, 1936 . 5 1,354 5 10 Add Excess of Income over ers ture forthe year. ; 41 Toronto University Presentation Fund Capital . : : ‘ 2 178 11 4 Revenue . : : : . 4 7 6 Carried forward Balance Sheet, 42,423 15 1) 9,791 15 10 1,395 9 10 182 18 10 53,938 6 8 GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT 31st March, 1937 Corresponding Figures 31st March, 1936. Se sa) 7d: 38,687 10 11 9,790 6 11 68 14 7 1,354 5 10 182 18 10 GENERAL PURPOSES :— Investments as scheduled with Income and Expenditure Account, No. 1 Sundry debtors and poms in ad- vance . Cash at bank . Cash in hand . SPECIAL PuRPOsEs :— Caird Fund Account Investments (see Income and Ex- ASSETS penditure Account, No. 2) Cash at bank Mathematical Tables Fund Account Cash at bank Sundry debtors | Cunningham Bequest Fund Account Investments (see Income and Ex- penditure Account, No. de ie Cash at bank Lise 41,961 12 d. 1 94 9 8 347 7 3 20 9,582 16 208 19 70 19 136 1,305 7 “IW 7 8 2 90 2 8 Toronto University Presentation Fund Account Investments (see Income and penditure Account, No. 4) . Cash at bank : Carried forward xxix 42,423 15 11 9,791 15 10 144 6 3 1,395 9 10 182 18 10 53,938 6 8 XXX Corresponding Figures 31st March, 1936. £ ae 1,080 2 2 1,065 & 4 20,068 9 7 72,247 17 2 GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT Balance Sheet, LIABILITIES (continued) Ss. d. Sound. Brought forward : - Bernard Hobson Fund Capital . ‘ 3 1,000 0 0 Revenue—Balance per last Account . SOneae 2 Add Excess of Income over Expenditure for the year Sin 77h ——— Somos Leicester and Leicestershire Fund, 1933 Capital ; : , : 1,000 0 O Revenue— Balance per last Account 65 8 4 Less Excess of Expendi- ture over Income for the year . - Zon on 10 —_——— 42 2 6 Herbert Spencer Bequest Fund 1241 0 0 Less Amounts Expended during year . ; : : 133 11 0 Norwich Fund, 1935 Radford Mather Lecture Fund Indian Science Congress Delegation Fund Subscriptions received to date Down House Endowment Fund : : 20,000 0 0 Sundry Creditors and Credit Balances : : : 2S Suspense Account Balance perlastAccount 24 18 8 Add Excess of Income over Expenditure for the year . Soya — 80 13 9 NOTE,.—There are contingent Liabilities in respect of grants voted to Research Committees at Blackpool and by Council in 1936 but not claimed at 3lst March, 1937, amounting to £579 7s. 6d. The amount which should, in accordance with Council’s resolu- tion, have been in the Contingency Fund at 31st March, 1937, was £2,375, but the surplus income available for this purpose has been insufficient by £434 2s. 11d. to meet the full annual amounts transferable. i YE Nea b 53,938 6 8 1,058 1 3 1,042 2 6 1,107 9 0 105 0 0 250 0 0 278 5 0 20,093 5 5 £77,872 9 10 I have examined the foregoing Account with the Books and Vouchers and certify and the Investments, and the Bank have certified to me that they hold the Approved. Ezer. GRIFFITHS \ Auditors. R. S. WHIPPLE | GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT XXxXi 31st March, 1937 (continued) Corresponding sist March, ASSETS (continued) 1936. £ os. d. i BES ds IY a Brought forward : - = 53,938 6 Bernard Hobson Fund Account Investments (see Income and Ex- penditure Account, No. 6) =, 150008 Of 70 Cash at bank ; : . : OS vl 1,030 2 2 SS SSS O53)" 1) 3 Leicester and Leicestershire Fund, 1933 Account = Investments (see Income and Ex- penditure Account, No. 6) 20) 1,000" +0) 0 Cash at bank 3 : : : 42 2 6 1,065 8 4 —_————— 1,042 2 6 Herbert Spencer Bequest Fund Account Investments (see Income and Ex- penditure Account, No. 7” , 741 0 0 Cash at bank . : 366 9 0 Co 1,107 9 0 Norwich Fund, 1935 Account (Income and nee Account, No. 8) - 3 Cash at bank C : 105 0 0 Radford Mather Lecture Fund Accousi Investments (see Income and Ex- penditure Account, No. 9) - 250 0 0 Indian Science Congress Pras Fund Account Cash at bank. 278 5 0 Down House Account Endowment Fund Investments (see Income and papel Account, No. 10). a - 20,000 0 0 Cash at bank : - : ‘ 36 12 8 Cash in hand : : i Wr Geat Sundry debtors and payments in advance . : : 22” “Oe 9 Stock of catalogues - : = 26 16 1 20,068 9 7 ————._ 20,093 5 5 72,247 17 2 £77,872 9 10 the same to be correct. I have also verified the Balance at the Bankers -Deeds of Down House. W. B. Keen, Chartered Accountant. 23 Queen Victoria St., London, E.C. 4. 4th June, 1937. GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT XXXii wWooooo Ol 68 : ? : * slaquiow yuopnyg ‘‘ ce 9S) = 3 : + - sjoyory, a]qvasjsuery, “‘ Ol 69b ~ ; yiodoy YIM ‘sioquioutenuuy “‘ Ss eel * + AyUO SuNaayQ Joy sroquiow jenuuy “‘ 0 78 ; : sIoquisyl Iejnsoy Tenuuy pio Aq “Ss oy: @WOont 3 9 AT S6 O 8I &d0 0 0 %9F 0 O FIST IT 6I 98 pis Ff ‘Pe “Shl LOEF “puey ur pur yurq ye ysec Whe k — ——— == syoojg jo onfeA) 9 ZL LPE e : 401g payeprjosuop AjuNoD uopuoyTy ‘yuso rod € “pg sg] SHEET jw 4 : yoorg Arevulpsio ‘o-n yyovgG weajg pep edoy “7O ‘0 0067 0 SzI 701, ‘Jorg Bese prose AVMTIEY Ws9}s9\\ WVOIT ‘yu20IId G “pg sO OOLT * spuog uvoy suipuny ‘yu00 10d b “pg 50 ~(000TF ysoo ye ‘suvoy jeooy yuso sed ¢ ‘pe ‘sgl P8i‘r7e SI 729 * 4soo 1” ‘(ons 29O 3804) 3201S uorsiaAuor ‘jus Jad $p “po ‘SL 6s ; 4809 32 32015 uotsiaAuor) “jus od f¢ ‘py “sgt g9c‘OF 4s09 ye ‘3907 UOTsIZAUOD *jyU99 Jed Fp “pg ‘SQ] VE6‘C1F eG0'@) ; hoa ye *y901¢ Poona uvoy rep, ‘yueo sad $¢ «= ‘py: ‘sgt pyo'st ) (AJ (ARISTA Opts ir : : lage 10G.5) = 8 reel ° ; : ; NOOnertTt—ONCSO é 0 +1 SE + Aouejunoooy pue pny ‘“‘ | ¢ Fr 9 6 €I $9 : . * srquoniqryxg ‘* | IT FT $s @ 8 tel ; + sasuodxo Suroavry, “6 | 2 ef ar Ol vI 881 : : : - soBeysog ‘‘ | fOr £1 961 00 I 7 : = quay “| 0 OT. 6 8I SL : : ; Azquoneyg “| I & 89 Ol OI LE JomMog pure Sunysry “Geox OT, | 8 OF 9 Pt Sc pen ge aun LIGNAdXA (‘pr ‘sz SEQ°EFF “QE/E/1E |4 & Hos'se yo sysojg fo ajo) | 1 91 €6€°I 4809 3v ‘spuog uvoy eM “ued sod Fe “PO ‘50 O0KIT S$ +S ; 3809 3@ “(ONSST BOE 30g) JOG EM “PL “Sel USF SI LZ8 ysO9 4¥ 2 eh Suneay 5 q , Aemprey man ieed ULIPU] ILA, “PG “SHI -GLET B Saees Ceieee : * -4s00 38 “YO0}G ‘yus0 od ¢ eIpuy “PO ‘sO O09‘ET aerrtaig e7ri's-* : : * 4809 38 ‘Yo0Ig “Jua0 sod Fz poyepyosuoy “PZ ‘SZ 6PL‘OT Ee Digests + 25 . 3 squauysaauy Suipuodsa1z09 ainjyipusdxy pus swoouy [e1ousy) +“ ‘ON ‘LE61 ‘HOUVIN Ist’ GAGNA UVAA AHL YOA SLNNOOOV AYNLIGNAdXA AUNV AWOONI XXxiii GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT oroweo Ole ine) ootoo I 1 096° Wa2e : * pIBMIO} pore : * ~—- passaysuvz} qunowe : iS SMOlIVX poejyy JS 0 : : $ * suoljZu0g S}UOUI}SQAUT UO 4S910}UT Pe212A0901 XBT, QUIODUT ° * ssulivog Jeiourry jo 3s09 spieMo} suoTeU0” siguonIqiyxg joodisary peuinjar ‘s}uvi3 jo ssouvyeq poepusdxouy¢) seoneonqad "y'g Ul s1UdUIOSTJIOAPY c * — suoryeoryqng jo aes * drysraquisur jo Amdxo uo pesigjsuvi} yUNOWE “e : suotjtsoduioa ayry Ag | sou as Ss L 0 aa © 9 P92 -_-SoOomMmMooceo oo ooo oo ooo ¢ * preMioj poriey * uoynepndog pur uornjeosuy + syusuiedxgq juejdsuery, euleg emmojry syoosuy JURIST] YsHg SARE ITyshqi9q] ; ydjopny exe] * -worapy yeotdory, . . Go jo Ayders005 ueunyy : cD pool, uon -¥}G [eOISOjOIg JoeMYser.T : + goddon ueroumns seul ued ‘ *UIDALL) SUD] > LEGT ‘QE6T FO33TUAMIO_) eqouexy Aq s999}TUIUIOZ) yal ie 0} pred sjuving oy : a3ep 0} 9myIp -uadxq : ssurivog [elowry oO ‘939 ‘Surpurq ‘Sunutsg : *SUOTINQLIJUOD UOIsUSg * saseM pure Solie[eg sosuodxq [eiauex) SUOISUIg 94 SIBIVYO [esa] * 993;1TUIUIOT) 9DUETIg AIR} -uswelIVg 0} uondriosqng * ydeistpi0j jo 1s0-D saqoosnrpiga fo a1tzy sagoasygo fo 480) (sasuadxa fo asvys) . . suorn.1029q7 “ce ayiqnf yokoy OJ, OO IT £4 £98'T IT ¢ eer b 9 8P6'T Or IT élé XXXIV GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT Ol Ol ie I I OG L 6 &brF 0967 096'r a5 . HWOONT uMmop }ysnosq souvyeq Ag |ze 7 gyz ©| 2 IT 86% ps “9E6L ‘Gorey ISTE soinsiy surpuodsei109 premio; yysno1g 0 Ss Loy L 6 ¢€rrs | OF 1 096% L 6 &bPr , : : : . : 01 yunoure *) eg] ‘YoIep 3s} ¢ 1e powreys 394 jOU Jnq pasti0yyNe YoIeaso1 0} sjueI5 Pan Aouasuryuory 0} poedejsues jyunoure oF . . . . . . UMOP pariieo reah 9} IO; 91nN}Tpuedxa J2AO JUIONUT JO ssaox9 Suroq ‘souvjeg ‘‘ * puny psy 0} passafsuvy sayos wort syqiaaoy : ydossouopy Ss uosisuvpy gf 415 c * puny so[quy, [eoneuoyieypy 0} poadsgjsuvsy soyes wor s}disv0y —suoneoyqng of, * premio; WY SNoIg AW LIGNAd Xa OL &T @8t BOUT: MELE ————————— 4 IL 866% fe © eké G OL & .& 99 9 ae: “9861 “qorey 48T¢ SONS Sulpuodsei10p (panuyjuoo) SInjipusdxy pue suIODUT [er9UNy vd w2N, XXXV GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT ghee ee17- i ; - 2 Ce a UnOUe “161 “yore ys1& ye pownep 404 jou nq ‘pastioyjne yorvaser 0} syUvIF) cS b soeF 0 & FOF S pv coer Thao ot p * zeod 94} IOy — : : * swat ayy L0f auozuy IT 9I ST oinjipusdxy 19A0 suI0DUT dag aunjipuadxg fo ssaoxa suraq ‘aouvjog ‘ jo ssooxo Suroq ‘aourjeg * [Paw cimen(o s + ydeisou0sy S,UosTIIe yy _ 9 SI €9€ _ ‘g ‘{ m1g—jueis jo yuourdedoy weg ‘ 9 SI ¢9 ° * — 9993TUTUIOD) — junosop aanjipuadxa 9 OL Fe syqey, [eonemoyseyy puo auosuy woLf patiafsuv. “ydoisouopy 0 0 OS] 22NTWIUIOD AsojoUIsIag suosuumpy “gf 4g fo savy woLf syqrasag “* 00 0s ° & + 9997]TUL Oo) : : pateaooas xv yj, au0ouyT * ort 19 “WI0L_ p1092yY [eI1d0[007, 0 61 86¢ ~ : * —- yso.19} UT. pue spueplArd ke Or 9 GE 0 0 Os * WOneIg [eOTSO] Ee go § YIN ~o1g, Suey] ynourAyg ‘9861 0 0 OS 22}TUUMOD 2IIqGzUJz saTdeyy pe oPe aps ae —pred sues of, adWOoNI Suypuodse1109 Gun LIGNAdXa ‘PL “S61 807F “Tue ye YseD (‘PL “S81 ZOL'SF =—€ QI 78S6F (‘pb +sZ go86F ‘96/&|1& 3 enjoy) sDELeL Ve te SUB) 5 ¢ LI P6S‘Z . . . . . . . . 3s09 312 £J901S gouasayoig *yue0 sod ¢ paiepyosuop Aemprey useyin0g “pO ‘SQ 000°7F 9 1 Lee © 380938 ‘QS/OE61 “POS posoieisey Juco Jed Fe pene” 70) 80 o0s‘eF ¢ b O6I'c ° * — 4s09 38 ‘YD0}G VOUDIBJOIg *yUID aoe a Pospyerney Aemyptexy ysti0og pue PueIPI| uopuoyT 70 ‘sO OOI‘Z7e € €1 0042 * 4s00 38 ‘y00}g “Ju90 Jod $¢ erpuy “POT “50 Lz29°7F ps Ff ¢ squausaouy 0 & FOP 0 6 FOF & 9 6896 ps F “9S6L “qo1eW ISTE soInsly Sutpaodse1109) C16] Ul 99}]TUIWOLE [eIOUDF) 943 Aq poydope SUOTFEPUSITUODII Y}IM VULPIODI" UT [IoUNO_ oy} Aq pasoystuTUUpE ‘716 ] UT ‘paren sou 31g jo 1J18 [euoNIpuooUN sy, puny paey “2 “ON GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT XXXVI ft rome , F ‘ ; * ysorozuy Aq 9 @ 9 8-12-07." ; , SpIUME OT, Le “Ose | Oe i GWOONI Pee pial eae AYALIGNAd Xa ‘PQ ‘SL pH ‘Hueq ye yse Supuodse110p , eae | (‘p& sg1 991F ‘96/&] 1 1 ano) Veoenonia ep TY Sipe 2 : : : : : 3809 JB YIOIS IBM “JUD Tod Fe CLL TF “L€/€/1€ 3 nye) quaussoauy *AyaAt}00dsa1 dousI0s porydde puv oind OT ssUSPNys po}d9]9s 0} ‘syood jo syuasord YIM 1943080} ‘opeur st Iva YoLa sjepau 9zZUOIq OM} JO UOTWeyUASOId B osmooUL OY} Wo, “pZ6] UI SuNeedyy OJUOIOT, oy) 3e juaszId sroquiom Aq poquosqns AjueJUNTOA puny y puny Uorjejuosolg AjISIDAIU OJUOIOT “Pp “ONT 0 0 99% 9 9 268 0 0 99F a : 5 : P : * aval 9 AI P6I ay} tof awosuy 1200 ainpipuadxg fo ssaoxy -- sauiingas fo uoynsyvas uo spforg “© | 0 6 Té O° Pr “le - aev9h 9y} 10} 91nj1puadxa rat Allis aad pa1aA0d01 xBy, suIODUT ‘* | OF 6 Z J9A0 QUIODUT JO s890x9 SuIoq ‘souv[eg “ Dieeiago. s : : : ysorsquy Aq | z 6 eZ — a aieeiee Suipurg puv Suyuug << eS ye ps 0 OI vz s2]qe} JO uorjesredoid oy) I0J syuvIy OT, {9861 pis ¥ youey ISTE somal dINOONI Suypuodser109) Fan LIGNad Xa PS “$2 06F “YUL ye Yse_D (PIL StL EoGIF 2 L Soele (pS sar ghr'eF ‘g6|&] 1€ ww anjv,) ‘Le/€/1€ 38 one) S$ 9 9€F 4809 3@ *Y90}g “JUDD Jod ¢ suvOTT [eI0T “pe ‘sey zogy 0 0 giz 66/661 ‘301g “Jus Jod Fe UopuoT jo 310g “PO “90 OOET 6 0 €s9 " * * * * -yaerg “yus0 Jed Fz payepyosuot “POT “89 LETTS Bie Sea + Szuaumsaauy ‘TOuno, ey3 Aq pesaysturwipe { ssoquinu jo Ar09y} 9y} UT s2]qu} [eOeUIAYyIeUI Mau Jo UOTWZIedo1d 2y) Joy “wueysuruunyD *D “[ "y ‘JoD-"7'T JO TM ey} Jepun 4ysn33 Ur GZG] UL UOTZIOOssy 243 Aq poArtaoer AoeS2] V jsonbog weysuruuny “¢ ‘ON eee | B IT 8d Mie ORT fame “9861 ‘qorvy 481¢ soma Surpuodser10¢) 9 IT £96 O PL Fe @ £ 908 ps Fg “986T ‘qoIeyl 481¢ somnat iT surpuodse1109 XXXVil GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT 9 91 Ser (PL *SS vat ayy 40f quoniy 4an0 aangipuagnr fo ssaoxa suiaqg ‘aounjog “‘ * parsA009y xvy, ouIOoUy “ pauanten qudia fp aoupjvg papuadxauy) ‘< ysorajuy Ag HWOONI PE “S| BSF “que ye YseD 12o1y .0 0 0001 ‘Lele/ te ye enyeA) petejstulu pe Jt: jis agement A hed ae sale ile 7 leis 0 0 oss ° < . 0} JUNOWe *LE61 “qoreyn| nae ye pouty 304 jou 3nq ‘pastsoy3ne YoIvassI 0} s}UvIL) ‘Aube DOL SEF OL &1 FI OTs : ze2h 94} 10; sinjIpusd xy ide C) I2A0 sans jo ssaoxo Sureq ‘souvjeg ‘ 00 & * pled syavig OL ps g sien nant AUN LIGNTdXa somsi iT Surpuodser109 (‘pS 8G S60'1F ‘g§]&/ 1& 30 anv) = soo 3 suvo'T [vI0'J ‘juI0 Jod ¢ pO 6 109F 4soo 7v spuog (191vagq) Ar0;91 A *}U29 Jod F 70 "SO OSPe $ yorvasos yeorSo0joa3 yo uoouroid 943 0} perdde oq 0} aurO.UT 943 ¢ Squauiysaauy ‘pouno: 2y3 Aq £ EG] ‘UOsqoyY pseusog ‘ry Jo ysonbaq ayy, pun, uosqoyy pavusog “Ss ‘ON 4 AL 9S £ & 9S | 0 0 000'T | | ps F | “9861 | ‘yore ISTE | soINslyT GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT XXXVIIi OS ce. = q avak 9y} I0F ourcduy I9A0 ainjipusdxy jo ssooxe Suroq ‘souvleg “ pa nss sd jo = ite pepusdxsup ‘ 4so.10}U] ie aNOONI P9 “St epF “Jueq ye ysey (pP9 “sil r66F O000TF ‘Le/e/ te 3 aNyeA) ——— 00s ; p ; 00¢ : ; : Ms 0 0 Ory: ‘L€61 oF Re PsbS, «Jeb Wore 481 § soma | durpuodseL10p 3809 3 YOOIG IBAA “U9 Jod ¥¢ * 4809 32 490} UOIsSIOAUOT *}UI0 Jad $¢ 0 0 O09 0} JuNOUIe ‘yore 3S[E 3e poume 304 30U 3Nq pasliOyjNe Yyorvoser 0} s}URID spac ayy sof aanpypusg “xq 4900 Uy fe ssaoxa suiaq ‘amunjog “ pied jurin o7, quan LIGNAdXaA (‘pF sox Szo'rF ‘9§/&/1& yo anjvg) PIl ‘SS 067 PIL ‘St = L8bTt ¢ squauysanuy ‘jlounor 2y3 Aq pesojsturupe $ QDUdINS JO JUSWIBDULAPL 9Y} JO} SUTYIOM s}UapNys ostMoYyIO 10 sdrysivjoyos Aq Surjstsse UL pasn 9q 0} 4S919}UT ay} ‘UOTEIDOssy ay} 0} poyuosoid ‘egg] UT Sutjs9JAl JO}sIdIV"T OY} OF puny [Loo] 9y} Jo 9ouL[eq popuedxoun sy7, ef6l ‘pun, O1IYS19}SodIo7] puv 19}899I97JT °*9 “ON “9861 “qoreyl ISLE sams Sulpuodsei109 XXXiX 0 1 elt 0 MW cet Ce AEE enc ath adr ae vipadaree JO} 9WIODUy I9AO sANyIpusdxy| jo ssooxo Suroq ‘oouvjeg Ag | — — — | 0 II €€1 > +939 ‘saredoz Jo 4s09 spreMo} UOTWNGII}U0;) —asnoy] uMoq OJ, | en i las ta a@WODONI awn LIGNAdXa ‘PO “56 99EF “YuRq 38 YseD EEE] Te 96 SNIe A) OO sree ; 4 : E ‘ ys09 7¥ ‘Yo0Ig eA “qu99 Jed Fe “pg sg IzeF 0 0 00h * 3800 3 ‘{9/QG6I Y901g Poxeposuo_ AyuNO_ UOpuO'T “yuUs0 sod ¢€ “PE “Sh s6et ps Ff ! syuauysoaur “yuauIMOpud jo sasodind soy se189p 10 AvM OU UT ynq ‘YoIvasar JO syUSUIN.I}SUT JO UOTeUOp IO sJayJaaeN jo yuaudmbe 10 ssredor 10 samyrusAMy Joy JO ‘suoNoeT]09 so smyvredde ‘syooq ‘sostumoid jo yUoWasIe[Ua IO aseyoind uo papusdxo aq 0} pue siv9h ¢ uTYIIM paysneyxe aq 0} “g¢G] SurINp peAtooa1 qaouadg yaqia Fy 932] Oy} Wor Is YW pun, jsonbog az990uadg JAoqIoFT = *Z “ON GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT xl ‘rea ay} Sutinp syusured Jo sjdtaser ou usaq savy 219], (PE S38 1n7e7F 0 0 ose $ * 3809 48 “19/9G6T “Y901g payeprfosuo;) AyuNOFD UOpuOT *yuUV2 Jad ¢ ‘pg ‘SLI 8b7F ‘“e/e/1e ye onjea) ps F 2 quaUnsoauy ‘APUNUTUIOT) OY} JO areFJaM\-9Y} 0} UONLIOI JOY} puv 2dUEINg Ur SsOUvAPY JUZ09y UO soin}de7 [erUUSTy Jo asuadxa ay} Sunsaur 0} pajyoAsp aq 0} Woxyar94} SuIOOUT yy ‘pung & 4SIAe3S2 0} OE6] Ur OMY prgjypey 4) “IL Woy poatooor 113 y puny 91Nj99'T TIYICIN PIOJpey 6 “ON PO “50 SOLS “{uUeq 3% yseDH ‘001F 0 yunowre “peg] ‘yore asy¢ y@ paurtefo 394 Jou ynq pastioyynE Yyoreasor 0} syuRIL) ‘0017 01 Sur -junoure ‘pred 494 you ynq ‘sasodind oynuaros 10; Surpueysyno syuvsS oae 2194} ynq “1894 ay} SuLMp syuourded Jo sydto09I ou u20q ‘TPUNOD ay} Jo UoLaIstp ay} 7@ YIM Yeap aq 0} ‘GEG] Ur a9y3 Play SuNsdpy GOIMION 243 JO 99}3TUILAOL- [ZI0'T ay} WIOY paataoer co] F jo 113 y SE6T ‘PUN YOIMAONT *g ‘ON xli GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT Mooonts + wos; JURID JO JUSWTRISUT - quess ysniy, WHIs]Ig vO4sOg Jo a[eS * SpusprlAIq pue jSoI9}UT suOT}eUOCT * palaAooe1 xv yj, ouTOoUT ‘ * giqearaoay squsy Ag | + puey ur pue yueq ie ysep (nal 0 0 OSE £ 6r 9% (i PS 9 8 968 Mid Kee ttt) & 0 O ITP¥I |) OS G3 | “9861 | “‘qorvyW ISTE somstiy | SurpuodseLi09 | ym O00 : premio} poten Suipnypour) osvur . $ asnes-urey “ aay S.40taaing §* -qaqem SS | (jomjed pu [10 qun.LIGNadxa + 4s09 32 *4903g pazeprfosuor *yu90 sod p AvmyIeY peoyuoyIg *y90}$ psa} 3s09 1@ uvivns) poyeprfosuop *yueo sad ¢ Aemjley Us9}S9AA 72915 ys09 3¥ ‘cz/SPEI ‘Y01G *yueo Jod ¢ eITeIsNY UI9}Sa\\ 3s0o 3% ‘cg/GHEI “IP 01g *juUa0 Jad g sayeAA YINOG MONT 3s09 3% ‘Y90}G JOUDIZJOIG p20} - -uvienyy *qus0 Jod $¢ sinoqiepy pue Aempey orejssoy pue prensystyz A eS fy al Ea premioy parser arco es ; ysonbag 1290uedg EP Siok S) Si Ge 0S = : 8 £& sonsojejyep) puv spi LIE : : . z LIS L890 se 0 Iti ree 4 AWOONI PL ‘St bhF (PO “sgl Lgo‘ecF — “Lelel1e 0 0 000027 Je SYIOIG jo onje A) 6 6 €10°2 GS L 9EPe 9 I 7eLPrz2 6 L Lore € LI 6€1‘2 0 61 89Pr‘c ’ LI 100°S "?p "S F ; 3809 38 ‘cp /SH6I * 401g *}uU99 Jod ¢ eljeNsny Jo y[eamuoUTUIOT) soo 3% *g9/gc6I 62019 *U00 sod Fp erpuy wiq pue sunysry ‘‘ * "939 ‘9905 eon “ec ‘ojo Sgouvainsuy ‘soyey ‘* | Yeig Jo saser, oF | (‘po ‘sh 1e0°SeF °9&/&/1& yo sy2015 fo anjv4) oos‘eF ore’eF oos‘2.7 oos‘*zF 000s F oos‘7F oos*sF GNOJ LNANMOGNY asnOF, NMOCT ¢ squauysaauy | | Oe 8 OT SI Or & 94 9 8I 98 8 ¢ 99 OL ST &8k 0 0 00002 ‘uoTyeU 94} 10J APOYSND UT UIMILGC 0} [LLIOWIOUI & se PE 9q 07 3j18 B Se UOTILIOOSSY OY} 0} JUSUIMOPUD UL YIM WI pozigjsuexy pue ‘ummieq jo suoy oy} Apiours0y ‘asnozy uMOG] jo Ajsedoid ayy pasmbor “GO YY ‘euMoIg UO syON_ (41g Mou) “apy ‘uoNeDOssy YsHTIg OY) Jo JUEpIseIg UITY “SYA ‘YWEy ny sg Aq 176] Ut 2peur jeodde uv 0} esuodsaxr uy osnoy] uUMOGg ‘OT "ON GENERAL TREASURER’S ACCOUNT € el serie ‘Ds ert * a : Prem; IYSNoIgq dHWODONI 6 6 see'T Ds g «. DE6T yore ISTE Samah Surpuodser109 € 2 ser Sess LEASE _ too) _ Te) — yo8tr DOSCOSG wn Ye) \F . . . yunosoy, ssuodsng 03 pertgjsueyy res 9Y} OJ oanjIpuedxo I2AO JUIOOUI JO sseoxe Sutsq ‘souvreg ‘‘ o . 5 6 ° Arauonyeys pue ‘ouoyderay, ‘sesvjsog ‘sunuig ‘ : : x * ssaq sjuejyunosoy ‘‘ * oSeriep pue yiodsuery, “ "09 ‘soyisinboyy ployssnoyy “‘ * —- SUOTINITISUT VSeIIIA 02 suoeuog ‘‘ SOULUDI UTIL] PUL S[eIIO}V yA : puey pue uspiry ‘‘ sjeMouoy pur sieday oT, premio; yYSNoIg aan LIGNAdXA 6 6 4e8T TG #9 00 68 I 8t 8t IT &1 @ P 6I SI (A) My T 6L 64 6 & Fé ps F “986T “qorIvyl ISTE soins surpaodse1109 (panuyuor) ISNOFT uMOG ‘OT “ON RESEARCH COMMITTEES, Etc. APPOINTED BY THE GENERAL COMMITTEE, MEETING IN NOTTINGHAM, 1937. Grants of money, if any, from the Association for expenses connected with researches are indicated in heavy type. SECTION A.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES. Seismological investigations.—Dr. F. J. W. Whipple (Chaiyvman), Mr. J. J. Shaw, C.B.E. (Secretary), Miss E. F. Bellamy, Prof. P. G. H. Boswell, O.B.E., F.R.S., Dr. E. C. Bullard, Dr. A. T. J. Dollar, Sir Frank Dyson, K.B.E., F.R.S., Dr. A. E. M. Geddes, O.B.E., Prof. G. R. Goldsbrough, F.R.S., Dr. Wilfred Hall, Mr. J. S. Hughes, Dr. H. Jeffreys, F.R.S., Mr. Cosmo Johns, Dr. A. W. Lee, Prof. E. A. Milne, M.B.E., F.R.S., Prof. H. H. Plaskett, F.R.S., Prof. H. C. Plummer, F.R.S., Prof. J. Proudman, F.R.S., Dr. A. O. Rankine, O.B.E.. F.R.S,, Rev. C. Rey, S.J., Rev. J. P. Rowland, S.J., Prof. R. A. Sampson, F.R.S., Mr. F. J. Scrase, Capt. H. Shaw, Sir Frank Smith, K.C.B., C.B.E., Sec. R.S., Dr. R. Stoneley, F.R.S., Mr. E. Tillotson, Sir G. T. Walker, C.S.I., F.R.S. £100 (Caird Fund grant). Calculation of mathematical tables.—Prof. E. H. Neville (Chairvman), Dr. J. Wishart (Secretary), Prof. A. Lodge (Vice-Chaiyman), Dr. W. G. Bickley, Prof. R. A. Fisher, F.R.S., Dr. J. Henderson, Dr. E. L. Ince, Dr. J. O. Irwin, Dr. J. C. P. Miller, Mr. F. Robbins, Mr. D. H. Sadler, Mr. W. L. « Stevens, Dr. A. J. Thompson, Dr. J. F. Tocher. £200 (Caird Fund grant). SECTIONS A, B, I—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, CHEMISTRY, PHYSIOLOGY. To co-ordinate the activities of Sections A, B, I, as regards joint symposia, etc., in so far as these relate to the Sciences lying on the border-lines between Physics, Chemistry, and Physiology.—Prof. David Burns, Dr. P. B. Moon, Prof. H. S. Raper, C.B.E., F.R.S., Prof. S. Sugden, F.R.S., Dr. D. M. Wrinch. SECTIONS A, C.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, GEOLOGY. The direct determination of the thermal conductivities of rocks in mines or borings where the temperature gradient has been, or is likely to be, measured.—Dr. Ezer Griffiths, F.R.S. (Chaiyman), Dr. D. W. Phillip (Secretary), Dr. E. C. Bullard, Dr. H. Jeffreys, F.R.S. (from Section A) ; Dr. E. M. Anderson, Prof. W. G. Fearnsides, F.R.S., Prof. G. Hickling, F.R.S., Prof. A. Holmes, Dr. J. H. J. Poole (from Section C). #40. SECTIONS A, J.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, PSYCHOLOGY. The possibility of quantitative estimates of sensory events.—Prof. A. Ferguson (Chairman), Dr. C. S. Myers, C.B.E., F.R.S. (Vice-Chaivman), Mr. R. J. Bartlett (Secretary), Dr. H. Banister, Prof. F. C. Bartlett, F.R.S., Dr. Wm. Brown, Dr. N. R. Campbell, Prof. J. Drever, Mr. J. Guild, Dr. R. A. Houstoun, Dr. J. O. Irwin, Dr. G. W. C. Kaye, Dr. S. J. F. Philpott, Dr. L. F. Richardson, F.R.S., Dr. J. H. Shaxby, Mr. T. Smith, F.R.S., Dr. R. H. Thouless, Dr. W. S. Tucker, O.B.E. xliv RESEARCH COMMITTEES, ETC. SECTION C.—GEOLOGY. To excavate critical geological sections in Great Britain.—Prof. W. T. Gordon (Chairman), Prof. W. G. Fearnsides, F.R.S. (Secretary), Prof. E. B. Bailey, F.R.S., Mr. H. C. Berdinner, Mr. W. S. Bisat, Prof. P. G. H. Boswell, O.B.E., F.R.S., Prof. W. S. Boulton, Prof. A. H. Cox, Miss M. C. Crosfield, Mr. E. E. L. Dixon, Dr. Gertrude Elles, M.B.E., Prof. E. J. Garwood, F.R.S., Mr. F. Gossling, Prof. H. L. Hawkins, Prof. G. Hickling, F.R.S., Dr. R. G. S. Hudson, Prof. V. C. Illing, Prof. O. T. Jones, F.R.S., Dr. Murray Macgregor, Dr. F. J. North, Dr. J. Pringle, Dr. T. F. Sibly, Dr. W. K. Spencer, F.R.S., Prof. A. E. Trueman, Dr. F. S. Wallis, Prof. W. W. Watts, F.R.S., Dr. W. F. Whittard, Dr. S. W. Wooldridge. £50 (£25 Bernard Hobson Fund; £25 contingent, Caird Fund). To investigate the reptile-bearing odlite of Stow-on-the-Wold, subject to the con- dition that suitable arrangements be made for the disposal of the material.— Sir A. Smith Woodward, F.R.S. (Chaiyman), Mr. C. I. Gardiner (Secretary), Prof. S. H. Reynolds, Mr. W. E. Swinton. £25 (Bernard Hobson Fund grant). To consider and report upon petrographic classification and nomenclature.— Mr. W. Campbell Smith (Chairman and Secretary), Prof. E. B. Bailey, F.R.S., Dr. R. Campbell, Dr. W. Q. Kennedy, Mr. A. G. MacGregor, Dr. S. I. Tomkeieff, Dr. G. W. Tyrrell, Dr. F. Walker, Dr. A. K. Wells. 10. To investigate the bone-bed in the glacial deposits of Brundon, near Sudbury, Suffolk.—Prof. W. B. R. King, O.B.E. (Chaivman), Mr. Guy Maynard (Secretary), Mr. D. F. W. Baden-Powell, Prof. P. G. H. Boswell, O.B.E., Mr. J. Reid Moir, Mr. K. P. Oakley, Mr. C. D. Ovey, Dr. J. D. Solomon, Sir A. Smith Woodward, F.R.S. 48. ‘ : To consider and report on questions affecting the teaching of Geology in schools.— Prof. W. W. Watts, F.R.S. (Chaiyman), Prof. A. E. Trueman (Secretary), Prof. P. G. H. Boswell, O.B.E., F.R.S., Mr. C. P. Chatwin, Prof. A. H. Cox, Miss E. Dix, Miss G. Evans, Prof. W. G. Fearnsides, F.R.S., Prof. A. Gilligan, Prof. G. Hickling, F.R.S., Prof. D. E. Innes, Prof. A. G. Ogilvie, O.B.E., Prof. W. S Pugh, Mr. J. A. Steers, Prof. H. H. Swinnerton, Dr. A. K. Wells. The collection, preservation, and systematic registration of photographs of geological interest.—Prof. E. J. Garwood, F.R.S. (Chairman), Prof. S. H. Reynolds (Secretary), Mr. H. Ashley, Mr. G. Macdonald Davies, Mr. J. F. Jackson, Mr. A. G. MacGregor, Dr. F. J. North, Dr. A. Raistrick, Mr. J. Ranson, Prof. W. W. Watts, F.R.S. To consider and report on erosion in part of the coast of Norfolk.—Prof. P. G. H. Boswell, O.B.E., F.R.S. (Chaivman), Prof. W. T. Gordon (Secretary), Dr. Burton, Mr. F. Leney, Rt. Hon. E. Lyttelton, Mr. L. M. van Moppes, Mr. J. E. Sainty, Mr. G. Slater, Mr. J. Solomon, Mr. J. A. Steers, Mr. J. S. Wilson, Dr. S. W. Wooldridge. SECTION D.—ZOOLOGY. To nominate competent naturalists to perform definite pieces of work at the Marine Laboratory, Plymouth.—Dr. W. T. Calman, C.B., F.R.S. (Chaivman and Secretary), Prof. H. Graham Cannon, F.R.S., Prof. H. Munro Fox, Dr. J. S. Huxley, Prof. H. G. Jackson, Prof.C.M. Yonge. £50. To co-operate with other sections interested, and with the Zoological Society, for the purpose of obtaining support for the Zoological Record.—Sir Sidney Harmer, K.B.E., F.R.S. (Chaiyman), Dr. W. T. Calman, C.B., F.R.S. (Sec- vetary), Prof. E. S. Goodrich, F.R.S., Prof. D. M. S. Watson, F.R.S. £50. To investigate the adaptations of freshwater animals to waters of very high salinity in Algeria.—Prof. P. A. Buxton (Chaivman), Mr. L. C. Beadle (Secretary), Dr. G. S. Carter, Dr. E. B. Worthington. £50. To investigate the social behaviour of the grey seal.—Prof. J. Ritchie (Chair- man), Dr. Fraser Darling (Secretary), Prof. E. A. E. Crew, Dr. J. S. Huxley, Dr. E. S. Russell. £50. iy RESEARCH COMMITTEES, ETC. xlv The progressive adaptation to new conditions in Artemia salina (Diploid and Octoploid, Parthenogenetic v. Bisexual).—Prof. R. A. Fisher, F.R.S. (Chair- man), Mr. A. C. Fabergé (Secretary), Dr. F. Gross, Mr. A. G. Lowndes, Dr. K. Mather, Dr. E. S. Russell, O.B.E., Prof. D. M. S. Watson, F.R.S. £20. To investigate British immigrant insects.—Sir E. B. Poulton, F.R.S. (Chairman), Dr. C. B. Williams (Secretary), Prof. F. Balfour-Browne, Capt. N. D. Riley. To consider the position of animal biology in the school curriculum and matters relating thereto.—Prof. R. D. Laurie (Chaiyman and Secretary), Mr. P. Ainslie, Mr. Cousins, Dr. J. S. Huxley, Mr. Percy Lee, Mr. A. G. Lowndes, Prof. E. W. MacBride, F.R.S., Dr. W. K. Spencer, F.R.S., Prof. W. M. Tattersall, Dr. E. N. Miles Thomas. To confer with the Museums Association on matters concerning the place and function of the Museum in Zoology.—Dr. J. S. Huxley (Chaivman), Dr. A. C. Stephen (Secretary), Dr. W. T. Calman, C.B., F.R.S., Prof. W. M. Tattersall, Prof. C. M. Yonge. SECTIONS D, I, K.—ZOOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY, BOTANY. To aid competent investigators selected by the Committee to carry on definite pieces of work at the Zoological Station at Naples.—Prof. E. W. MacBride (Chaivman and Secretary), Prof. Sir J. Barcroft, C.B.E., F.R.S., Dr. Margery Knight, Dr. J. Z. Young. £50. SECTIONS D, K.—ZOOLOGY, BOTANY. To aid competent investigators selected by the Committee to carry out definite pieces of work at the Freshwater Biological Station, Wray Castle, Winder- mere.—Prof. F. E. Fritsch, F.R.S. (Chaiyman), Dr. E. B. Worthington (Secretary), Prof. P. A. Buxton, Miss P. M. Jenkin, Dr. C. H O’Donoghue (from Section D) ; Dr. W. H. Pearsall (from Section K). 875. Co-ordinating committee for Cytology and Genetics——Prof. Dame Helen Gwynne-Vaughan, G.B.E. (Chaivman), Dr. D. Catcheside (Secretary), Prof. F. T. Brooks, F.R.S., Prof. F. A. E. Crew, Dr. C. D. Darlington, Prof. R. A. Fisher, F.R.S., Mr. E. B. Ford, Prof. R. R. Gates, F.R.S., Dr. C. Gordon, Dr. J Hammond, Dr. J. S. Huxley, Dr. T. J. Jenkin, Mr. W. J. C. Lawrence, Dr. K. Mather, Dr. F. W. Sansome, Dr. W. B. Turrill, Dr. C. H. Waddington, Dr. D. Wrinch. 45. SECTION E.—GEOGRAPHY. To inquire into the present state of knowledge of the human geography of Tropical Africa, and to make recommendations for furtherance and develop- ment.—Prof. P. M. Roxby (Chaiyvman), Prof. A. G. Ogilvie, O.B.E. (Secretary), Dr. A. Geddes (Assistant Secretary), Mr. S. J. K. Baker, Miss D. M. Doveton, Prof. C. B. Fawcett, Mr. W. Fitzgerald, Prof. H. J. Fleure, F.R.S., Prof, C. Daryll Forde, Mr. R. H. Kinvig, Mr. J. McFarlane, Brig. M. N. MacLeod, D.S.O., Prof. J. L. Myres, O.B.E., F.B.A., Mr. R. A. Pelham, Mr. R. U. Sayce, Rey. E. W. Smith, Brig. H. S. L. Winterbotham, C.B.,C.M.G.,D.S.O. 2. To co-operate with bodies concerned with the cartographic representation of population, and in particular with the Ordnance Survey, for the production of population maps.— (Chaiyman), Prof. C. B. Fawcett (Secretary), The Director General of the Ordnance Survey, Col. Sir Charles Close, K.B.E., C.B., C.M.G., F.R.S., Prof. H. J. Fleure, F.R.S., Mr. A. C. O’Dell, Mr. A. Stevens, Mr. A. V. Williamson. To consider and report upon ambiguities and innovations in geographical terminology.— (Chaiyman), Dr. S. W. Wooldridge (Secretary), Mr. H. King, Mr. R. H. Kinvig, Prof. E. G. R. Taylor. xlvi RESEARCH COMMITTEES, ETC. SECTION F.—ECONOMIC SCIENCE AND STATISTICS. Chronology of the world crisis from 1929 onwards.—Prof. J. H. Jones (Chaiyman), Dr. P. Ford (Secretary), Mr. McDougall (Assistant Secretary), Prof. G. C. Allen, Mr. H. M. Hallsworth, C.B.E., Mr. R. F. Harrod, Prof. J. G. Smith. £25. SECTION G.—ENGINEERING. To review the knowledge at present available for the reduction of noise, and the nuisances to the abatement of which this knowledge could best be applied.—Sir Henry Fowler, K.B.E. (Chaiyman), Wing-Commander T. R. Cave-Browne-Cave, C.B.E. (Secretary), Mr. R. S. Capon, Dr. A. H. Davis, Prof. G. W. O. Howe, Mr. E. S. Shrapnell-Smith, C.B.E. £10 (Contingent, Caird Fund). Electrical terms and definitions.—Prof. Sir J. B. Henderson (Chairman), Prof. F. G. Baily and Prof. G. W. O. Howe (Secretaries), Prof. W. Cramp, Prof. W. H. Eccles, F.R.S., Prof. C. L. Fortescue, Prof. A. E. Kennelly, Prof. E. W. Marchant, Prof. J. Proudman, F.R.S., Sir Frank Smith, K.C.B., C.B.E., Sec. R.S., Prof. L. R. Wilberforce. SECTION H.—ANTHROPOLOGY. To co-operate with a Committee of the Royal Anthropological Institute in the exploration of caves in the Derbyshire district —Mr. M. C. Burkitt (Chatr- man), Mr. A. Leslie Armstrong (Secretary), Prof. H. J. Fleure, F.R.S., Miss D. A. E. Garrod, Dr. J. Wilfred Jackson, Prof. L. S. Palmer, Mr. H. J. E. Peake. £25. To conduct anthropometric work in Cyprus.—Prof. J. L. Myres (Chaiyman), Mr. L. Dudley Buxton (Secretary), Dr. G. M. Morant, Miss M. L. Tildesley. £25. To conduct archeological excavations in the Fens.—Prof. J. H. Hutton, C.I.E. (Chaivman), Mr. K. H. Jackson (Secretary), Mr. M. C. Burkitt, Dr. J. D. G. Clark, Miss Eleanor Hardy, Mr. T. C. Lethbridge. £25 (Leicester and Leicestershire Fund). To investigate early mining sites in Wales——Mr. H. J. E. Peake (Chaiyman), Mr. Oliver Davies (Secretavy), Prof. V. Gordon Childe, Dr. C. H. Desch, F.R.S., Mr. E. Estyn Evans, Prof. H. J. Fleure, F.R.S., Prof. C. Daryll Forde, Sir Cyril Fox, Dr. Willoughby Gardner, Dr. F. J. North, Mr. V. E. Nash Williams. £8. To investigate blood groups among primitive peoples.—Prof. H. J. Fleure (Chaiyman), Prof. R. Ruggles Gates, F.R.S. (Secretary), Dr. F. W. Lamb, Dr. G. M. Morant. §&7. To co-operate with a committee of the Royal Anthropological Institute in assisting Miss G. Caton-Thompson to investigate the prehistoric archeology of the Kharga Oasis.—Prof. J. L. Myres, O.B.E. (Chairman), Miss G. Caton-Thompson (Secretary), Dr. H. S. Harrison, Mr. H. J. E. Peake. To report on the probable sources of the supply of copper used by the Sumerians. —Mr. H. J. E. Peake (Chaivman), Dr. C. H. Desch, F.R.S. (Secretary), Mr. H. Balfour, F.R.S., Mr. L. H. Dudley Buxton, Prof. V. Gordon Childe, Mr. O. Davies, Prof. H. J. Fleure, F.R.S., Dr. A. Raistrick, Dr. R. H. Rastall. To co-operate with the Torquay Antiquarian Society in investigating Kent’s Cavern.—Sir A. Keith, F.R.S. (Chairman), Prof. J. L. Myres, O.B.E., F.B.A. (Secretary), Mr. M. C. Burkitt, Miss D. A. E. Garrod, Mr. A. D. Lacaille. To carry out research among the Ainu of Japan.—Prof. C. G. Seligman, F.R.S. (Chairman), Mrs. C. G. Seligman (Secretary), Dr. H. S. Harrison, Capt. T. A. Joyce, O.B.E., Rt. Hon. Lord Raglan. RESEARCH COMMITTEES, ETC. xlvii To report on the classification and distribution of rude stone monuments in the British Isles—Mr. H. J. E. Peake (Chaivman), Dr. Margaret A. Murray (Secretary), Mr. A. L. Armstrong, Mr. H. Balfour, F.R.S., Mrs. E. M. Clifford, Sir Cyril Fox, Mr. T. D. Kendrick. To conduct archeological and ethnological researches in Crete——Prof. J. L. Myres, O.B.E., F.B.A. (Chaiyman), Dr. G. M. Morant (Secretary), Mr. L. Dudley Buxton, Dr. W. L. H. Duckworth. To report to the Sectional Committee on the question of re-editing ‘ Notes and Queries in Anthropology.’—Prof. H. J. Fleure, F.R.S. (Chairman), Mr. Elwyn Davies (Secretary), Dr. H. S. Harrison, Dr. G. M. Morant, Prof. C. G. Seligman, F.R.S., Mrs. C. G. Seligman. SECTION I.—PHYSIOLOGY. To deal with the use of a stereotactic instrument.—Prof. J. Mellanby, F.R.S. (Chairman), Prof. R. J. S. McDowall (Secretary). SECTION J.—PSYCHOLOGY. To develop tests of the routine manual factor in mechanical ability.—Dr. C. S. Myers, C.B.E., F.R.S. (Chaiyman), Dr. G. H. Miles (Secretary), Mr. H. Binns, Prof. C. Burt, Dr. F. M. Earle, Dr. Ll. Wynn Jones, Prof.T.H. Pear. £50. The nature of perseveration and its testing.—Prof. F. Aveling (Chaiyman), Dr. W. Stephenson (Secretary), Prof. F. C. Bartlett, F.R.S., Dr. Mary Collins, Prof. J. Drever, Mr. E. Farmer, Prof. C. Spearman, Dr. P. E. Vernon. £10 (Contingent grant, Caird Fund). SECTION K.—BOTANY. Transplant experiments.—Sir Arthur Hill, K.C.M.G., F.R.S. (Chairman), Dr. W. B. Turrill (Secretary), Prof. F. W. Oliver, F.R.S., Prof. E. J. Salisbury, F.R.S., Prof. A. G. Tansley, F.R.S. 5 (Leicester and Leicestershire Fund). SECTION L.—EDUCATIONAL SCIENCE. To consider and report on the possibilities of organising and developing research in education.—Prof. F. Clarke (Chaiyman), Miss D. Bailey, Mr. A. Gray Jones, Dr. M. M. Lewis, Mr. W. H. Robinson, Mr. J. Sargent. £5 (Leicester and Leicestershire Fund). To consider and report on the gaps in the informative content of education, with special reference to the curriculums of schools.—Sir Richard Gregory, Bart., F.R.S. (Chairman), Mr. G. D. Dunkerley (Vice-Chaiyman), Mr. A. E Henshall (Secretary), Prof. C. M. Attlee, Miss L. Higson, Mr. H. G. Wells. £10 (Leicester and Leicestershire Fund). CORRESPONDING SOCIETIES. Corresponding Societies Committee.—The President of the Association (Chairman ex-officio), Dr. C. Tierney (Secretary), the General Secretaries, the General Treasurer, Dr. Vaughan Cornish, Mr. T. S. Dymond, Prof. W. T. Gordon, Dr. A. B. Rendle, F.R.S., Prof. J. Ritchie, Dr. G. F. Herbert Smith. RESOLUTIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS. The following resolutions and recommendations were referred to the Council by the General Committee at the Nottingham Meeting for con- sideration and, if desirable, for action : From Section A (Mathematical and Physical Sciences). That Section A, on the occasion of a visit to the grave of George Green, the world-famous mathematician of Nottingham, viewed with some concern the deterioration that is taking place in the tombstone, and would respect- fully suggest that representations be made to the proper authorities to take such steps as seem fit to maintain in good condition the resting-place of this renowned man. From Section D (Zoology). That the Committee of Section D, having learned from the public press that the buildings and collections of the Museum established at Tring by the late Lord Rothschild have been bequeathed to the nation on condition that the Trustees of the British Museum undertake their custody and maintenance, desire to record their opinion that the continuance of the Tring Museum as an active centre of scientific research is a matter of the utmost importance from a national, and indeed from an international, point of view. For many years the collections preserved there, more particularly the vast and unequalled collection of Lepidoptera, have attracted research workers from all over the world and have been the means of adding largely to our understanding of the problems of geographical variation. ‘The Sectional Committee earnestly desire that the permanent conservation of these collections and the continuance of the facilities for their study provided by the munificence of the late Lord Rothschild will be ensured by their being placed in the custody of the Trustees of the British Museum. The Committee request the Council of the British Association to bring this expression of opinion to the notice of the Trustees of the British Museum. From Section E (Geography). That the Sectional Committee of Section E learn with great regret of the discontinuance by the Ordnance Survey of the fifth (relief) edition of the one-inch map. ‘This map marked an advance in the cartography of the country in that it gave, for the first time, invaluable data for the study of land forms. Much geographical work has been done in those areas for which sheets have been published, and the Committee view with grave concern the prospect of having to abandon work in other areas, or to postpone it indefinitely, in consequence of the suspension of this edition. Further, the Committee feel that the issue of special relief printings without names and other detail, which was initiated with this edition, provided for the first time an adequate base map for studies in land forms and regional geography ; and it would urge that, whether the fifth (relief) edition be proceeded with or not, sheets showing relief and water features only in the style of the fifth (relief) edition should be available. RESOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS xlix From Section G (Engineering). That following the Presidential Address delivered to Section G by Sir Alexander Gibb, the Sectional Committee considered what action could best be taken by the British Association to assist in improving and co-ordin- ating the various forms and channels in which new engineering knowledge is now published. Improvement is urgently required and the Institution of Civil Engineers is already taking action to this end. The Engineering Section of the British Association, however, is in touch with such an exceptionally wide range of engineering that it sees the importance and also the difficulty of co-ordinating all branches of engineering in the matter of publications. It is therefore recommended that letters be written on behalf of the Council to the Institution of Civil Engineers and to the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, drawing attention to the great im- portance of improving the co-ordination of arrangements for publishing and indexing new engineering knowledge and the results of engineering research, and expressing a hope that any new system which is being developed may be made to cover the widest possible range. From Section H (Anthropology). That in view of the importance of anthropology as a means of promoting concord and understanding between men of different traditions, the British Association earnestly recommends to H.M. Government that anthropology should be made a compulsory subject of study in the training of all probationers appointed to proceed to India or Burma. From Section L (Educational Science). That in view of the great contribution that an extended system of adult education might make to the political and cultural life of the nation, it be urged that H.M. Government be asked to refer the question of developing adult education either to the Consultative Committee of the Board of Education or to any other appropriate Committee. From the Conference of Delegates of Corresponding Societies, supported by Section D (Zoology). That the Council of the British Association be requested to represent to His Majesty’s Minister of Agriculture and to His Majesty’s Secretary of State for Scotland, the necessity of instituting an inquiry to ascertain the effects, in respect of efficiency, economic reactions, and humaneness, of available methods of dealing with rodents and other wild mammals that affect agriculture. From the Conference of Delegates of Corresponding Societies. That the Conference recommend to the Council of the British Association the desirability of establishing through its Corresponding Societies’ Com- mittee a close liaison with the Association for the Study of Systematics in Relation to General Biology with a view to the Corresponding Societies undertaking work bearing upon systematic problems. 23 FEB 1938 Hritish Association tor the Advancement of Science. NOTTINGHAM: 1937 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS THE HISTORY OF EVOLUTIONARY THOUGHT AS RECORDED IN MEETINGS OF THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION BY Pror. Sim EDWARD B. POULTON, D.Sc., LL.D., F.R.S. Fellow of Jesus College, Oxford PRESIDENT OF THE ASSOCIATION. Sir WILLIAM THOMSON, in his Address at Edinburgh in 1871, said that ‘ the real origin of the British Association ’ was given in the words of a letter written by David Brewster to John Phillips on February 23, 1831, a few months before the first meeting : ‘ The principal object of the Society would be to make the cultivators of science acquainted with each other, to stimulate one another to new exertions, and to bring the objects of science more before the public eye, and to take measures for advancing its interests and accelerating its progress.” That the time was fully ripe for the birth of the Association is made very clear by the words written by John Keble to a friend, referring to the D.C.L. degrees conferred, at the Oxford meeting in 1832, on David Brewster, Robert Brown, John Dalton and Michael Faraday: ‘The Oxford Doctors have truckled sadly to the spirit of the times in receiving the hodge-podge of philosophers as they did ’—an opinion on which Lord Salisbury commented at the Oxford meeting in 1894: ‘ It is amusing at this distance of time, to note the names of the hodge-podge of philosophers whose academical distinctions so sorely vexed Mr. Keble’s gentle spirit.’ It is not only amusing but pathetic that such words should have been used by a revered member of a University which had done B 2 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS ' splendid service for science, as has been so well shown in Dr. R. T. Gunther’s volumes. Faced by the serious duty of preparing this address, I felt that the best hope of interesting you would be to choose a subject which has received special attention at our meetings. I have selected the progress of thought on Organic Evolution as it may be followed in addresses, papers, and discussions, mainly restricting myself to the series of meetings which began with the Jubilee at York in 1881, the first of many that I have had the pleasure of attending. The British Association provides a very favourable field for the discussion of many-sided subjects such as Evolution—subjects which attract members from very different as well as from closely related Sections. Hence a wide range of varied experience is open to one who can look back over more than half a century ; and I do not propose to exclude some of the humorous sayings and incidents which, from time to time, have enlivened our meetings and con- tributed to their success. Some of them certainly deserve to be rescued from oblivion, although to perform this pious duty I must risk the enmity of the Goddess of Folly, who as Erasmus tells us, proclaimed: ‘I hate a man who remembers what he hears.’ The Fiftieth Anniversary at York was a memorable meeting, with Sir John Lubbock (Lord Avebury) as President, and the Chair of every Section except Economics, under Grant Duff, taken by a Past-President of the Association. I then enjoyed to the full one of the chief benefits conferred by our Association upon its younger members—the opportunity of meeting older men, up to that time only known to them by the fame of their discoveries. Prof. O. C. Marsh had come over from Yale, his main object being to buy for his University Museum the second and more perfect fossil of the wonderful ancestral bird Archzo- pteryx, with teeth and a long, lizard-like tail—clear evidence of Reptilian origin. The earlier example had been bought for the British Museum at a price which was said to have provided the dowry for a professor’s daughter, and Marsh soon realised, as he told me, that the second was not for sale on any terms. ‘ We let the other go and I believe they would kill me if this were sold ’ was the reply given to him by the authority in Munich. He was able, however, to study the fossil, and his description and drawings of the teeth, in the Geological Section, followed the only attack on Evolution itself, as distinct from its causes, which I have ever witnessed at any of our meetings. It was the exhibition by H. G. Seeley of his reconstruction of Archzopteryx from this fossil, 1 Early Science in Oxford, vols. i-xi. THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 3 which aroused the fury of the palzontologist, old Dr. Thomas Wright of Cheltenham: ‘ Archzopteryx hasn’t got a head, how can it possibly have teeth?’ he growled, knowing nothing of the latest find or of the fact that Sir John Evans, our President at Toronto, had discovered a detached head and scattered teeth on the slab in which the older specimen was embedded. In spite of Prof. Newton’s positive statement and the form of the teeth, drawn by Prof. Marsh at the request of the Chairman, Dr. Wright, quite unconvinced, con- tinued muttering ‘ Archzopteryx is a very good bird,’ its virtue in his opinion entirely uncontaminated by any taint of Reptilian affinity. Prof. Marsh also read a paper in the Zoological Section on his own wonderful discoveries of toothed birds from the rocks of the western United States. Richard Owen, President of the Section, was in the Chair and, with the memory of old and embittered controversies in his mind, the author told me that he had felt rather anxious in bringing this communication forward. But in that friendly atmo- sphere there was no reason for alarm. Owen welcomed the paper warmly and in confirmation told us, in the most charming manner, of the traces of teeth found in an embryo parrot. The event which stands out most clearly in my memories of the Jubilee meeting is Huxley’s evening lecture on ‘ The Rise and Progress of Palzontology ’—the science which provides an essential part of the foundation on which Geographical, Geological and Biological evolutionary history has been built. The insuperable difficulty felt by the older naturalists was to believe that the land had been for the most part deposited under the sea, and to account for the presence of fossils, or as they were called, ‘ formed stones.’ The true solution, Huxley explained, was found and published in 1669 by Nicholas Steno, a Danish Professor of Anatomy at Florence, who carefully studied certain fossils, known as ‘ glossopetre,’ which abounded in the Tuscan rocks and were believed to be fossil fig-leaves. Steno, who was not satisfied with this interpretation, dissected a shark’s head and showed that the ‘ glossopetrz ’ exactly corresponded in every particular with the teeth—‘ that in fact they were shark’s teeth.’ The emphasis with which Huxley made this statement comes back to me after the lapse of nearly sixty years. From this Steno was led to conclude that they were the teeth of shark-like fishes living in the Tuscan sea and later embedded, with other remains, in the strata which had there accumulated. I have not noticed the fanciful suggestion of ‘ fossil fig-leaves ’ in any published version or account of Huxley’s lecture that I have seen, but he certainly told us of it and it is an interesting example of the attempts made by the naturalists of the day to explain the fossils embedded in rocks then believed to be of terrestrial origin. I 4 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS cannot resist the temptation of quoting Plot’s ? more ingenious and amusing effort to account for the well-known layer of oyster-shells (Ostrea bellovacina) found ‘.. . at some places here in England, particularly at Cats-grove [now Katesgrove] near Reading . . .; which how they should come here without a Deluge, seems a difficulty to most men not easily avoided.’ Plot was, however, helped ‘ to a salvo’ for his own objection by remembering that Reading was ‘ a Town of very great action during the Invasions of the Danes, who cutting a deep trench cross between the Kennet and Thames, and inclosing themselves as it were in an Island, held it against King Ethelred, and Alfred his Brother a considerable time; from whence in all probability, the Saxons having removed their Cattle and other provisions before the Danes arrival, ’tis likely they they might be supplyed from their Navy with Oysters, which during the time of the aboad of the Army on Land, might be a very suitable employment for it: Which conjecture, if allowed, there is nothing more required to make out the possibility of the bed of Oysters coming thither without a Deluge, but that Cats-grove was the place appointed for the Armies repast.’ The probability of this suggestion may be inferred from the age of the ‘ Woolwich and Reading’ beds in which the oysters are found—estimated by my friends Prof. Watts and Prof. Hawkins at about 50 to 60 million years. Dr. Plot’s explanation of fossils in general as well as of flowers was of a very different kind. ‘To account for their existence he appealed to ‘ the wisdom and goodness of the Supreme Nature, by the School-men called Naturans, that governs and directs the Natura naturata here below, to beautifie the World with these varieties ; which I take to be the end of such productions as well as of most Flowers, such as Tulips, Anemones, &c. of which we know as little use as of formed stones.’ The modest and withal amusing paragraph which follows I venture to quote in full as an example to be followed in scientific controversy : * And thus I have given the grounds of my present opinion, which has not been taken up out of humor or contradiction, with intent only to affront other worthy Authors modest conjectures, but rather friendly to excite them, or any others, to endeavor collections of shell-fish, and parts of other Animals, that may answer such formed stones as are here already, or may hereafter be produced: Which when ever I find done, and the reasons alleged solidly answered, I 2 The Natural History of Oxfordshire, being an Essay toward the Natural History of England, by Robert Plot, D.D. Printed at the Theater in Oxford. 1677. Dedicated To the most Sacred Majesty of Charles the Second, King of Great Britain, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith, etc. (pp. 118-122). THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 5 shall be ready with acknowledgment to retract my opinion, which I am not so in love with, but for the sake of Truth I can chearfully cast off without the least reluctancy.’ One chief object which, as I believe, Huxley had before him was to bring forward a calm, clear statement of the evidence on which alone it was posstble to achieve that ‘ reconstruction of an extinct animal from a tooth or bone,’ which had made so deep an impression on the imagination. ‘The reconstruction was in fact a simple inference based on anatomical experience such as that gained by Steno when he dissected the shark and concluded that the ‘ glosso- petrz ’ were the teeth of shark-like fishes. But this reasoning— that a fossil tooth or bone on the surface of a rock, cannot by itself enable the geologist to predict that a skeleton of a certain type lies hidden beneath—seeming to diminish the glory of Cuvier’s splendid work, was resented by Owen who had replied with the bitter taunt that a tooth can tell us a great deal—a donkey can kick his master but he cannot eat him. ‘This may have been the encounter referred to by Huxley when he wrote of a friendly meeting with Owen at the Zoological Section of the Association in Leeds (1858): ‘so that the people who had come in hopes of a row were (as I intended they should be) disappointed.’* In the same spirit, I think, Huxley was glad to speak of the ‘ glossopetrz ’ at the Jubilee meeting, where Owen was President of a Section, and calmly and simply, to reaffirm conclusions which are unassailable. Huxley then passed on to Steno’s further study of fossils and his proof of their relationship to terrestrial freshwater and marine organisms, and to his application of this evidence to the past condi- tion of 'Tuscany—all discussed ‘in a manner worthy of a modern geologist’ and later extended by Buffon to all parts of the world then known to be fossiliferous. ‘These conclusions, ‘ which almost constitute the framework of palzontology,’ only required one addition, made towards the end of the eighteenth century by William Smith, who showed that geological strata contained characteristic fossils so that rocks of the same age could be identified in all parts of the world, while the biologist could follow the changes in the living population of the globe—a record of constant extinction and con- tinual generation of new species. We were then led to three general conclusions: (1) the vast length of time during which life has existed on the earth—‘ certainly for millions of years’; (2) the continual changes which living forms have undergone during this period ; (3) the successive changes in the best-known fossil groups are such as we should expect if each series ‘ had been produced by the gradual modification of the earliest form... .’ This last conclusion meant evolution which so completely accorded with 3 Life and Letters, vol. i, p. 157- 6 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS recent discoveries that ‘if it had not existed, the palzontologist would have had to invent it.’ I can never forget the words spoken to me after the lecture by a dear friend of my youth, the late Viriamu Jones, Principal of University College, Cardiff: ‘At every sentence I felt myself bowing to Huxley and saying “ you are the greatest man here ; no one else could have said that as you have said it.” ’ As Huxley’s lecture continued in a calm spirit an embittered controversy, so his thoughts on the immensity of past geological and biological time lead naturally to another controversy on the age of the earth conducted intermittently at our meetings between 1892 and 1921. It is, I think, a good example of the invaluable help which the British Association brings to discussion when there appears to be a difficulty in reconciling the conclusions reached by the followers of different sciences. Lord Kelvin’s estimate of a hundred million years as the period during which the earth had been cool enough to permit the existence of life upon its surface—a period reduced by Prof. Tait to ten million—was a great difficulty to geologists and biologists who believed that an immensely longer time was required for the history of the fossiliferous rocks and the evolution of animals and plants. Thus, to quote only one instance, Darwin writing to Wallace in 1871 and referring to ‘ missing links,’ said, ‘I should rely much on pre-Silurian time ; but then comes Sir William Thomson, like an odious spectre.’ The geologists resisted more firmly. Thus Sir Archibald Geikie, in his Presidential Address at Edinburgh in 1892, concluded his discussion of the sub- ject with these words: ‘ The geological record furnishes a mass of evidence which no arguments drawn from other departments of Nature can explain away, and which, it seems to me, cannot be satisfactorily interpreted save with an allowance of time much beyond the narrow limits which recent physical speculation would concede.’ At the Leeds meeting in 1890 I had many opportunities of meeting Prof. John Perry, and when we were walking together on the Sunday afternoon I asked him to tell me something of the Kelvin- Tait conclusions and how far they must be accepted. He had been a demonstrator under Kelvin and spoke of the intense interest with which he had followed his lectures at Glasgow, and he gave me no hope of escape. His change of opinion, throwing a most interesting light upon the influence of the British Association, was the result of the Presidential address at Oxford in 1894, when Lord Salisbury chaffed the believers in natural selection, telling them that he did not wonder that they required many hundred million years for so slow a process, but that ‘if the mathematicians are right, the biologists cannot have what they demand. ... The jelly-fish would have THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 7 been dissipated in steam long before he had had a chance of dis~ playing the advantageous variation which was to make him the ancestor of the human race.’ When Perry read this pronouncement, sweeping aside the firm convictions of biologists and geologists, he was led to re-examine the evidence and soon found a flaw. ‘The heat of the earth had been calculated on the assumption of a con- ductivity uniform through the whole mass, but Perry showed that with a conductivity becoming higher with increasing depth the Kelvin-Tait estimate of the time required for cooling to the existing temperature—on which the age of the habitable earth had been based—must be immensely lengthened. Perry told me of this destructive criticism and very kindly helped me to make use of it in the address to Section D at Liverpool in which I replied to Lord Salisbury’s amusing attack on the evolutionists. Lord Lister was our President at Liverpool in 1896, and I cannot resist the temptation to digress for a moment and recall the address in which one of the greatest benefactors of mankind told us, with the utmost simplicity and modesty, the story of his life’s work and the success which, in spite of all opposition, had been achieved. To hear him was an enduring inspiration. The year 1896 was also the Jubilee of Lord Kelvin’s wonderful half-century of achievement in research and teaching, and I could not help feeling some regret that any criticism of his work should appear at this particular time. But in the kindly spirit of our Association such doubts were quite unnecessary. I well remember how he came one day to our Sectional Committee-room to bring me some volumes of his works, and how, as I have recorded before, in the following year as we were travelling across Canada after the Toronto Meeting and the chance of collecting insects for a few minutes at each station could not be resisted, Lord Kelvin said to his wife,‘ My dear, I think we must forgive Poulton for thinking that the earth is so very old when he works so hard in one day out of all the endless millions of years in which he believes |’ 4 The one line of evidence which left some anxiety in 1896, was suggested by Helmholtz who allowed the sun only eighteen million years to have been giving out radiant heat at the present rate—a period Lord Kelvin was willing to extend to 500 million—and this estimated maximum was also accepted by Sir George Darwin, who, in his address ® at Cape Town in 1905, spoke of the new evidence obtained by M. and Mme. Curie in their proof that radium gives out heat, and, quoting in confirmation the work of R. J. Strutt, W. E. Wilson, and G. H. Darwin, finally concluded that ‘ the physical argument is not susceptible of a greater degree of certainty 4 Report, British Association, Centenary Meeting, 1931, p. 78. 5 Report, British Association, 1905, pp. 514-518. 8 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS than that of the geologists, and the scale of geological time remains in great measure unknown.’ The light thrown by radium upon the Helmholtz estimate was also referred to in the Presidential Address of Ray Lankester at York in 1906, of J. J. ‘Thomson, quoting the work of Strutt, Joly and Rutherford, at Winnipeg in 1909, and became a predominant subject in the Joint Discussion on the Age of the Earth, between Sections A, C, D and K, at Edinburgh in 1921.6 Lord Rayleigh in opening this discussion concluded ‘ that radioactive methods of estimation indicate a moderate multiple of 1,000 million years as the possible and probable duration of the earth’s crust as suitable for the habitation of living beings. . . .’ Even in the present year Sir Ambrose Fleming, in his address to the Victoria Institute, is reported in The Times of January 12 to have maintained that ‘ We were not in possession of any generally agreed scientific modes of geological time measurement, but only with estimates which were based for the most part on personal predilec- tion or guesses at truth.’ It is to be regretted that the conclusions of scientific colleagues should be attributed to ‘ personal predilec- tion,’ and as for ‘ guesses at truth —what are these but hypotheses ; and surely the discoverer whose imaginative effort led to the therm- ionic valve and did so much to endow the world with the infinite possibilities of wireless—surely he has little cause to choose for the — serious efforts of others the word which in this connection carries a suggestion of shallow irresponsibility. Geologists and biologists do not profess to know the age of the earth as the abode of life, but they are sure that, in the words used by Sir William Turner at Bradford in 1900, its birth ‘ must have been in the far-distant past, at a period so remote from the present that the mind fails to grasp the duration of the interval.’ I fear that too much of our time has been occupied by the attempt to show that the field is clear for the discussion of Organic Evolu- tion, but, until this could be done, any such discussion appeared to be well-nigh useless. It is, I think, a mistake to emphasise too strongly the very natural shock received by many who read the Origin or heard of its teaching for the first time and without any preparation ; and I believe an even greater mistake to criticise the clergy for the time that elapsed before their acceptance of the new teaching. I shall never forget the reception of Aubrey Moore’s paper, ‘ Recent Advances in Natural Science in their Relation to the Christian Faith,’ by the Church Congress at Reading in 1883.’ No speaker could have carried his audience with him more thoroughly: there was not a single protest or indication of dissent—nothing but enthusiastic ® Report, British Association, 1921, Pp. 413-415. 7 Science and the Faith, London, 1889, pp. 222-235. THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 9 applause. The Bishop of Oxford, Dr. Mackarness, was in the chair when the paper received this unanimous welcome—only twenty- three years after the Oxford meeting at which another Bishop of Oxford put his rude and foolish question to Huxley. It is pleasant to know that their celebrated encounter left no bitterness, for Huxley wrote in 1891 to Francis Darwin—‘ In justice to the Bishop, I am bound to say that he bore no malice, but was always courtesy itself when we occasionally met in after years.’ I remember as a youth receiving a gentle parental warning against committing myself too entirely to a belief in evolution—a very different experience from that of our President at Hull in 1922, my friend Sir Charles Sherrington, who in 1873 was persuaded by his mother to take the Origin with him on his summer holiday, with the inspiring words—‘ It sets the door of the Universe ajar ! ’ I have already recalled Dr. Wright’s indignation at York in 1881 as my only experience of opposition to a belief in Organic Evolution at any of our meetings, and the published Proceedings confirm this impression of unanimity. Thus, R. H. Traquair, addressing the biologists at Bradford in 1900, said, ‘ I hardly think that we should now find a single scientific worker who continues to hold on to the old special creation idea’ ; and Lord Salisbury at Oxford in 1894, referring to Darwin, said, ‘ He has, as a matter of fact, disposed of the doctrine of the immutability of species. It has been. mainly associated in recent days with the honoured name of Agassiz, but with him has disappeared the last defender of it who could claim the attention of the world.’ The mention of this great American naturalist recalls ‘T'yndall’s fine address at Belfast in 1874 and his memories of Agassiz’s words, ‘ I was not prepared to see this theory received as it has been by the best intellects of our time. Its success is greater than I could have thought possible.’ Huxley, who had seconded the vote of thanks to Lord Salisbury, wrote to Hooker a few days later: ‘ It was very queer to sit there and hear the doctrines you and I were damned for advocating thirty-four years ago at Oxford, enunciated as matters of course— disputed by no reasonable man !—in the Sheldonian Theatre by the Chancellor. . . .’ § A letter written two days earlier to Boyd Dawkins records Huxley’s opinion of another part of the address. ‘ Lord Salisbury gave him- self away wonderfully, but he was so good about Darwin himself that I shut my eyes to all the nonsense he talked about Natural Selection.’ ® 8 Life and Letters, 1900, vol. ii, p. 379. ® From a letter of August 10, 1894, printed in the Jesus College (Oxford) Magazine, for Lent Term, 1928; and reprinted in Hope Reports, vol. xvi, 1929, No. 3, p.6. (Privately circulated to many scientific libraries.) Huxley’s letter of August 18, 1894, to Lewis Campbell (Life and Letters, vol. ii, p. 379) refers to the same subject. B2 10 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Leaving now the subject of Organic Evolution itself, as generally accepted, I- wish to speak on the difficult question of its motive causes which for many years have formed the subject of addresses, discussions and papers at our meetings. The great division into two opposed theories of causation became clear in 1887 when Weismann attended the meeting at Manchester, and a discussion on ‘ The Hereditary Transmission of Acquired Characters’ was held in Section D. From that time evolutionists attending our meetings have been either ‘ Lamarckians,’ following Erasmus Darwin, Lamarck, Buffon and Herbert Spencer, or ‘ Darwinians’ who followed Darwin and Wallace. Darwin himself, however, included the Lamarckian conception of ‘ use-inheritance ’ as a motive cause, although believing it to be far less important than Natural Selection. The term ‘ Neo-Darwinian’ has therefore been applied to those who, accepting Weismann’s teaching, reject ‘ use-inheritance ’ altogether. It must always be remembered that, apart from any theory of causes, the world owes its belief in organic evolution to all the great men whose researches and teaching have. founded the two schools, and perhaps chiefly, at any rate among the English-speaking nations, to Herbert Spencer. I was first led to realise the extent of his transatlantic popularity when I learned from an American story greatly enjoyed in those far-off undergraduate days, that his books were keenly appreciated by a bashful hero, who was so far from sharing the sublime confidence of their author, that he was only led to perform the most fateful action in life by the pressing advice of a very young nephew who assured him, in the presence of the lady, that if he was fond of her, the proper thing to do was to kiss her. Herbert Spencer’s infallibility certainly lent itself to such stories as that of his supposed reply to an argument—‘ That can’t be true, for otherwise First Principles would have to be re-written—and the edition is stereotyped’; or how Darwin said that to read Spencer always made him feel like a worm, but that he retained the worm’s privilege of wriggling, and at another time ‘ wonderfully clever, and I dare say mostly true.’ But, allowing for a style which provoked these and other amusing comments, we must never forget that believers in the doctrine of Organic Evolution owe an immeasurable debt to Herbert Spencer. James Russell Lowell’s amusing lines in the Biglow Papers ?° appear to prove that Lamarckism was prevalent in America many years before the Origin : ‘Some flossifers think thet a fakkilty’s granted The minnit its proved to be thoroughly wanted, 10 The lines are quoted from the First Part, published 1846-48. THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS II Ez, fer instance, thet rubber-trees fust begun bearin’ Wen p'litikkle conshunces come into wearin’ ,— Thet the fears of a monkey, whose holt chanced to fail, Drawed the vertibry out to a prehensile tail.’ The year of the Manchester meeting, 1887, was the fiftieth anni- versary, and we are now celebrating the Centenary, of the entry in Darwin’s pocket-book : “In July opened first note-book on Transmutation of Species. Had been greatly struck from about the month of previous March on character of South American fossils, and species on Galapagos Archipelago. ‘These facts (especially latter), origin of all my views.’ It is especially interesting to recall that these views, as Professor Newton told us in his address to D, the Biological Section, did not include Natural Selection which only came into Darwin’s mind when he read Malthus, On Population, in October, 1838. Newton, who had read the proof-sheets of the great Life of Darwin, pub- lished later in 1887, then spoke of Wallace’s independent discovery, made twenty years after Darwin’s, a discovery suggested to him also by reflecting on Malthus, and of the friendship between the two great men to whom this fruitful conception had come, referring the cynic who would ‘ point the finger of scorn at the petty quarrels in which naturalists unfortunately at times engage’ to this ‘ greatest of all cases, where scientific rivalry not only did not interfere with, but even strengthened, the good-feeling which existed between two of the most original investigators.’ And here I cannot resist the desire to quote a part of the speech made by Wallace at the most thrilling scientific gathering I have ever attended—the fiftieth anniversary of the Darwin-Wallace Essay read before the Linnean Society on July 1, 1858, only twelve days after the arrival of Wallace’s letter and manuscript from the Moluccas. Wallace then said, on July 1, 1908 : “ The idea came to me, as it had come to Darwin, in a sudden flash of insight : it was thought out in a few hours . . . and sent off to Darwin—all within one week. J was then (as often since) the “ young man in a hurry”: he, the painstaking and patient student, seeking ever the full demonstration of the truth that he had discovered, rather than to achieve immediate personal fame. ... If the per- suasion of his friends had prevailed with him, and he had published his theory, after ten years’—fifteen years’—or even eighteen years’ elaboration of it—J should have had no part in it whatever, and he would have been at once recognised, and should be ever recognised, as the sole and undisputed discoverer and patient investigator of the great law of ‘“‘ Natural Selection,” in all its far-reaching con- sequences,’ 14 11 Darwin-Wallace Celebration of the Linnean Society of London, 1908, pp. 6, 7. 12 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS Amusing evidence of the difficulty with which this ‘ great law ’ was understood is afforded by a verse written by Lord a and dated May, 1861 : ‘A deer with a neck that was longer by half Than the rest of its family’s (try not to laugh), By stretching and stretching, became a Giraffe, Which nobody can deny.’ 1? Yet Wallace, referring to Lamarck’s hypothesis and ‘ that now advanced,’ had written in his Section of the Joint Essay : *‘ Neither did the giraffe acquire its long neck by desiring to reach the foliage of the more lofty shrubs, and constantly stretching its neck for the purpose, but because any varieties which occurred among its antitypes with a longer neck than usual at once secured a fresh range of pasture over the same ground as their shorter-necked companions, and on the first scarcity of food were thereby enabled to outlive them.’ There were fortunately others who did not launch such ill-aimed criticism. ‘Thus Professor Newton, reminding the Section that the new teachings had been at once accepted by Canon Tristram 4° before the appearance of the Origin of Species (on November 24, 1859), expressed, with all the enthusiasm of one who was devoted to the same delightful branch of natural history, ‘ the hope that the study of ornithology may be said to have been lifted above its fellows.’ It was indeed very fortunate that the Darwin-Wallace Essay should have been read so soon after its appearance by a naturalist who looked on the species question as did Tristram—a great traveller and observer who studied indefatigably the birds he loved, as living creatures and in as many countries as he could visit. At the last meeting of the British Association in Nottingham (1893) Canon Tristram was President of Section D and, in his address, gave an account of the observations referred to by Newton at Man- chester. The historic interest of this early acceptance of Natural Selection is such that I have prepared a brief abstract of his chief conclusions : During a visit of many months to the Algerian Sahara in 1857-58, he ‘ noticed the remarkable variations in different groups, according to elevation from the sea, and the difference of soil and vegetation.’ On his return he read the Darwin-Wallace Essay and wrote, ‘ It is hardly possible, I should think, to illustrate this theory better than by the larks and chats of North Africa.’ He then explained how the colours arose by selective destruction of birds which harmonised less well than others with the surface of the desert. And similarly with other larks having ‘ differences, not only of colour, but of 12 The Origin of Species. A newsong. In Songs and verses, social and scientific, by an old contributor to Maga. Edinburgh, 1868, 2nd Ed. 18 Ibis, October, 1859, pp. 429-433. THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 13 structure,’ chiefly ‘ marked in the form of the bill.’ He took as instances a very long-billed lark (Galerita arenicola), resorting exclusively to the deep, loose, sandy tracts, and a very short-billed allied species (G. isabellina), haunting the hard and rocky districts. He then pointed out that there is individual variation in the bills of larks and that the shorter-billed birds would be at a disadvantage in obtaining food from sandy areas but at an advantage among the rocks where strength is required. He concluded, ‘ Here are only two causes enumerated which might serve to create, as it were, a new species from an old one. Yet they are perfectly natural causes, and such as | think must have occurred, and are possibly occurring still. We know so very little of the causes which, in the majority of cases, make species rare or common that there may be hundreds of others at work, some even more powerful than these, which go to perpetuate and eliminate certain forms “according to natural means of selection.” ’ The temptation to record an amusing incident which happened at one of the meetings of Section D at Manchester, cannot be resisted. Work was proceeding smoothly under the genial guidance of Prof. Newton when, suddenly, Dr. Samuel Haughton of Dublin entered and from the back of the room announced in arresting tones that he had an important communication to make about the animals preserved from the Flood. He believed that Mrs. Noah strongly objected to her husband’s intention to take the elephants on board, fearing that their weight would cause a dangerous displacement of the Ark’s metacentre. How this domestic difference was composed we had no opportunity of learning, for as the Chairman, whose expression combined sympathetic amusement with mild deprecation, was rising and about to protest, Dr. Haughton, anticipating the result, had already turned towards the door, telling us over his shoulder that he was on his way to make a fuller communication on the subject to the Anthropological Section. After this brief description of an event, which I hope you will agree ought not to be forgotten, we must return to Organic Evolution and to one of the most important subjects debated at any time before a meeting of the British Association—the question, ‘Are Acquired Characters Hereditary ? "—brought before the world by Prof. August Weismann, who was present at Manchester and spoke in the dis- cussion (unfortunately not reported), introduced by Ray Lankester, in which Dr. Hubrecht, Patrick Geddes, Marcus Hartog and the present speaker, took part. Weismann’s conclusion that ‘ Acquired Characters ’ are not inherited, was held by Prof. Goodrich, in his address to Section D at Edinburgh in 1921, to be ‘ the most important 14 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS contribution to the science of evolution since the publication of Dar- win’s Origin of Species,’ an opinion with which the great majority of biologists will agree, although the terms employed for the two classes, the Inherited and the Non-inherited, together with the ideas under- lying them, were shown by Adam Sedgwick, at Dover in 1899, Archdall Reid, and others, as well as by Goodrich himself, to be incorrect. Nevertheless it will probably be impossible to abandon the word ‘ acquired,’ employed by Erasmus Darwin (1794), Lamarck (1809), and Prichard (1813) as well as by later authorities. Whenever environmental conditions are followed by characteristic changes, absent when these conditions are absent; or when such changes follow the use or disuse of the parts of an organism, or the education it has received, then we have before us the ‘ acquired’ characters maintained by Weismann to be incapable of hereditary transmission. This vital conclusion, accepted, as I believe it is, by nearly all biologists, is not appreciated as it ought to be by the general public. A brief statement of a single piece of evidence may convince some who are doubtful about a conclusion with which human life is very deeply concerned. My old friend the late A. A. Macdonell, Professor of Sanskrit at Oxford, spoke two languages, English and German, as they are spoken by native Englishmen and Germans. I asked him whether he thought it was possible for any mature person to learn a foreign lan- guage so perfectly that he would be mistaken for a native. He replied, that he was sure it could not be done and that his own ability to speak the two languages as he did had been only made possible because as a small child he had been continually taken backwards and forwards between the two countries. Yet any human being trans- ported as a baby from his own country to another and brought up there among the natives will learn to speak as they speak. All the past generations, however many, during which his ancestors spoke the language af his birthplace, will count for nothing, will not retard his acquisition of another tongue or modify it in any way. An interesting and amusing example is provided by the futile striving of an Englishman to pronounce the Welsh double-l, generally attempted by the substitution of ‘th.’ And even the advice given by a Welsh clergyman to the English Bishop of his diocese is unlikely to bring success: ‘ You must put the tip of your Right Reverend tongue against the roof of your Right Reverend mouth, and hiss like a goose.’ The result of education as an ‘ acquired’ character in the Weis- mannian sense is of such special importance that I think it is well to quote the conclusions stated by Sir Ray Lankester in his address to the seventy-fifth meeting of the Association at York. He then main- tained that the ‘ power of building up appropriate cerebral mechanism THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 15 in response to individual experience, or what may be called ‘‘ educa- bility,” is the quality which characterises the larger cerebrum, and is that which has led to its selection, survival, and further increase in volume’... ‘“ Educability”’ can be transmitted; it is a congenital character. But the results of education can not be transmitted. In each generation they have to be acquired afresh... .On the other hand, the nerve-mechanisms of instinct are transmitted, and owe their inferiority as compared with the results of education to the very fact that they are not acquired by the individual in relation to his particular needs, but have arisen by selection of congenital variation in a long series of preceding generations.’ 14 Lankester was led by these conclusions to reject altogether the theory of G. H. Lewes, G. Romanes, and others, “ that instincts are due to lapsed intelligence,’ a theory also disproved by Lloyd Morgan’s observations on young birds described by him at the Ipswich meeting in 1895.15 Another very important subject brought forward by Lankester was the evidence, originally published by him in 1894,1° that Lamarck’s first and second laws of heredity ‘ are contradictory the one of the other, and therefore may be dismissed.’ His state- ment may be briefly summarised as follows : The first law assumes that in spite of thousands of generations during which a normal environment has ‘ moulded the individuals of a given species of organism, and determined as each indi- vidual developed and grew “responsive ”’ quantities in its parts (characters) ; yet, as Lamarck tells us, and as we know, there is in every individual born a potentiality which has not been extinguished. Change the normal conditions . . . and (as Lamarck bids us observe), in spite of all the long-continued response to the earlier normal specific conditions, the innate congenital potentiality shows itself. The individual . . . shows new responsive quantities in those parts of its structure concerned, new or acquired characters.’ ‘So far, so good. What Lamarck next asks us to accept, as his “second law,’’ seems not only to lack the support of experimental proof, but to be inconsistent with what had just preceded it. The new character which is ex hypothesi, as was the old character which it has replaced—a response to environment . . . is, according to Lamarck, all of a sudden raised to extraordinary powers. The new or freshly acquired character is declared . . . to be capable of transmission by generation ; that is to say, it alters the potential character of the species. It is no longer a merely responsive 14 Report, British Association, 1906, pp. 26-27. The conclusions here quoted had been communicated to Société de Biologie of Paris, in 1899 (Jubilee Volume) and were reprinted in Nature, vol. lxi, 1900, pp. 624-625. 18 Report, British Association, Pp. 734- 16 Nature, vol. li, 1894, p. 127; Report, British Association, 1906, pp. 29, 30. 16 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS or reactive character, determined quantitatively by quantitative conditions of the environment, but becomes fixed and incorporated in the potential of the race, so as to persist when other quantitative external conditions are substituted for those which originally determined it.’ The effect of Lamarck’s laws on the hereditary transmission of acquired characters would be this: ‘ A past of indefinite duration is powerless to control the present, while the brief history of the present can readily control the future.’ After hearing a very condensed statement of conclusions so essentially bound up with the progress of Organic Evolution, I feel sure that you will wish to be reminded of Prof. Ewing’s words which followed the address at York : ‘ Now is the winter of our discontent made glorious summer by this Ray of Lankester.’ Returning to the unreported discussion on the inheritance of acquired characters at Manchester, I venture to bring forward certain observations opposed to a belief in.Lamarckian evolution by means of inherited experience—observations which I then described and have not known to be answered. In the relationship between enemy and prey there is very commonly no opportunity for the latter to learn by experience. The wonderfully elaborate adapta- tions by which sedentary insects are hidden from enemies have been evolved, not by experience of enemies but by avoidance of enemies. In these examples, and they are numberless, we are driven to accept Weismann’s conclusion and with him to invoke ‘ the all-sufficiency of Natural Selection.’. When one of the twig-like caterpillars, of which there are so many in this country, is detected by an insecti- vorous bird it can do nothing and is devoured at once. Its one defence is the astonishingly perfect resemblance to a twig of the bush or tree on which it lives. It is firmly fixed and its weight also supported by an almost invisible thread so that it cannot escape as many caterpillars do by dropping to the ground and sheltering in the grass or among dead leaves. Its one chance of survival is to gain so perfect a disguise that it will not be seen, and to attain this end the adaptive devices are most elaborate and wonderful: its twig-like shape and colours with the power of gradually adjusting these so as to resemble the bark of the bush or tree on which the parent moth laid the egg from which it came, even the power to reproduce exactly the appearance of lichen, the rigid stick-like attitude maintained during the hours of daylight. Finally there is the evidence, recently obtained by Robert Carrick,!” that the disguise does protect ; for examples of one of these caterpillars, resting on ” Trans. Roy. Ent. Soc., Lond., vol. 85, part 4 (May, 1936), p. 131, 3 pls. THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS ey a branch of its food-plant fixed over a wren’s nest containing young, were unnoticed by the parent bird which used the same branch as a convenient perch ; yet seen and at once taken when placed on a white surface below. One of the best examples of a prophetic instinct is to be found in the larva of an African Tabanid fly (7. biguttatus). This maggot lives and feeds in soft mud which, during the dry season when the chrysalis stage has been reached, will be traversed in all directions by wide and deep cracks in which insectivorous animals can search for prey. But the maggot, while the mud is still soft, prepares for this danger. By tunnelling spirally up and down it makes a line of weakness which will cause a pillar to separate from the mass when the mud hardens and contracts. It then tunnels into the still soft pillar and becomes a chrysalis in the centre of its deeperend. How- ever wide the cracks which appear in the mud, the maggot has arranged beforehand that they will not invade its cylinder. Dr. W. A. Lamborn, who made this most interesting discovery, observed that the summits of the pillars, forming circular discs of about the size of a penny, scattered here and there over the surface, were never thus traversed, but that an empty shell was protruding from the centre of each when the fly had emerged.1® My friend the late Prof. J. M. Baldwin, the distinguished American psychologist, well remembered at many of our meetings, wrote when he heard of this discovery : ‘it seems complete—one of those rare cases of a single experience being sufficient to establish both a fact and a reason for the fact! It is beautiful.’ I would ask any believer in Lamarckian evolution, or in Hering’s and Samuel Butler’s theory of unconscious memory residing in the germ-cells, how it would be possible to explain these prophetic instincts, adapted not to meet but to avoid future experience, except by the operation of natural selection. The appeal to Orthogenesis, or internal developmental force, as the motive cause of evolutionary progress has often been made— generally by paleontologists rather than by the observers of living forms. Any such belief in the potency of an internal tendency is, I think, open to the criticism made by Thiselton Dyer in his address to Section D at Bath in 1888: ‘ This appears to me much as if we explained the movement of a train from London to Bath by attri- buting to it a tendency to locomotion. Mr. Darwin lifted the whole matter out of the field of mere transcendental speculation by the theory of natural selection, a perfectly intelligible mechanism by which the result might be brought about. Science will always 18 Proc. Roy. Soc., B, vol. 106, 1930, p. 83, pl. v; Proc. Ent. Soc. Lond., vol. v, 1930, p. 14, 3 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS prefer a material modus operandi to anything so vague as the action of a tendency.’ It is not necessary for me to speak on the rediscovery of Mendel’s great work and all that it has meant to our Biological Sections in the early decades of the present century. The recent developments, following the work of Haldane, R. A. Fisher, and others, and the vitally important relationship between Mendelism and Natural Selection were brought before us last year in Julian Huxley’s illuminating address to Section D. The older belief that only large variations, or mutations as they then began to be called, were subject to Mendelian inheritance, and that small variations were not inherited at all, disappeared when further researches proved that extremely minute differences were ‘heritable in the normal Mendelian manner,’ !® and, with this, the foundation of Darwinian evolution became immensely strengthened. It is also right to remember that Bateson, the leader of Mendelian research in this country, always believed in Natural Selection, regarding it indeed as self-evident and not very interesting. Also that Ray Lankester, as long ago as his 1906 address at York, maintained that however far Mendelism was advanced it ‘ would not be subversive of Mr. Darwin’s generalisations, but probably tend to the more ready application of them to the explanation of many difficult cases of the structure and distribution of organisms.’ The relationship between the germinal foundation of Mendelian and Weismannian heredity was considered in a paper by L. Doncaster read before Section D at the South African meeting in 1905. He then maintained that Weismann’s ‘ hypothesis that the material bearer of hereditary qualities is the chromatin of the nucleus’ of the germ-cells had been confirmed by recent work on their matura- tion which ‘ has shown that they contain a mechanism which seems precisely adapted to bring about that segregation of characters which forms the most fundamental part of the Mendelian theory, and it seems hardly possible that the two things are unconnected.’ MacBride also, in his address to the same section at Newcastle in 1916, spoke of the ‘ great epoch-making discovery of experimental embryology, viz. the existence of SPECIFIC ORGAN-FORMING SUB- STANCES.’ ‘These fundamental discoveries bring to mind a conversa- tion with Weismann when he had been finally driven to frame and elaborate this hypothesis, and was so appalled by the number and minuteness of the material bearers of hereditary qualities contained in a single germ-cell that, as he told me, he could not believe that the physicists and chemists were correct in their conclusions about the size of the atom. He admitted that diverse lines of evidence led to 19 Report, British Association, 1931, p. 77 and references quoted. i THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 19 the same result, but even so, he believed the future would prove that physicists were mistaken and that the atom was far smaller. It is impossible to say more than a few words about the very interesting and important discussion on ‘ The present state of the Theory of Natural Selection ’ held at the Royal Society on May 14 last year. The subject was approached from many points of view by both zoologists and botanists, and their conclusions were very welcome to Darwinians who remembered the earlier opinions expressed when Mendel’s great work was rediscovered. I think, however, that Prof. D. M. S. Watson, in the opening address, was inclined to underestimate the value of the existing evidence for a ‘ selective death rate,’ although everyone will agree that ‘ any new evidence . . . or indeed any suggestion of cases which might be capable of investigation,’ would be most desirable. I may briefly mention a few experiments brought before Section D at the Bristol meeting in 1898 beginning with the work of Weldon and Thompson on the Common Shore Crab, showing that the effect of china clay and other impurities in the sea at Plymouth was selective and promoted changes of shape which ensured that the water flowing over the respiratory surface was more efficiently filtered. Then, on the subject of chance, the heroic help rendered by Mrs. Weldon, who four times recorded the result of 4,096 throws of dice, showing that the faces with more than three points were on the average, uppermost slightly more often than was to be expected. It comes back to me very clearly because of the interesting explana- tion—that the points on dice are marked by little holes scooped out of the faces, and that points 6, 5, and 4, respectively opposite 1, 2, and 3 are somewhat lighter, more of the ivory having been removed ; also because of Francis Galton’s delight and his humorously expressed wonder whether the facts had been realised by those who had an interest other than scientific in the throwing of dice. Experimental evidence was also submitted by Miss Cora B. Sanders (Mrs. C. B. S. Hodson) and myself, proving that when the rough, angular pupa of the small tortoiseshell butterfly “is sus- pended from a surface against which it stands out conspicuously, it is in far greater danger than when it is fixed to one upon which it is concealed.’ To the observer of living creatures, however, the most convincing evidence is provided by animals themselves. When a wild bird is seen to capture some conspicuous butterfly or moth and then immediately to reject it the association between inedibility and a warning colour is more convincingly suggested than when insects are offered to animals in confinement, although such experiments 20 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS | are of great value and often provide the only available evidence. There are, however, instances in which abundant data for statistical investigation are furnished by the wild animals themselves. Thus the long-eared bat has the convenient habit of eating moths—its regular food—while it hangs suspended from a surface to which it returns after each capture ; and as the wings are rejected, these may be collected in large numbers, yielding valuable information on the significance of concealing and warning patterns. In the attempt to determine the motive causes of organic evolu- tion, the work of the naturalist, the student of living nature, is essential. His task is to do what Lyell did for geology by directing attention to the forces now in operation and seeking with their help to interpret the past. By the death of Lord Rothschild, on August 28, the world has lost a great naturalist who devoted his life to the creation of a splendid museum offering unique opportunities for the study of modifications which arose as the species of an important Insect Order (Lepidoptera) gradually spread over the areas which they now occupy. It was his wish that this immense field for research upon these latest phases of evolutionary change should become the property of the Nation, forming a magnificent addition to the British Museum. I feel confident that it is the earnest hope of us all that Lord Rothschild’s wish may be realised and that this great memorial of a life devoted to Natural History will provide constant inspiration to many workers in the same branch of science. Associated with these researches is the study of adaptations which have been developed in recent times and can, in certain instances, be proved to undergo changes even now. Thus the interesting observations of H. Lyster Jameson showed that a pale local race of the common mouse had been formed, although in- completely, in from 100 to 125 years, by the selective attacks of owls and hawks on sandhills near Dublin.2® I have long believed that the colours of animals provide one of the most fruitful fields in which to pursue these investigations, and I regret that this work has been recently attacked by an American zoologist who, referring to the recent revival of natural selection, continues—‘ if the doctrine can emerge minus its sexual selection, its warning colors, its mimicry and its signal colors, the reaction over the end of the century will have been a distinct advantage.’#4 It is of course impossible to discuss, on the present occasion, this confident attempt to de- preciate the value of work associated with the names of Darwin, Bates, Wallace, Trimen and Fritz Miller. I will only point out 20 Journ. Linn. Soc. (Zool.), vol. 26, 1898, p. 465, pl. 30. 21 Evolution. A. Franklin Shull. (New York, 1936.) THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 21 that the conclusions on warning colours and mimicry have been immensely strengthened and confirmed by the later observations of Guy Marshall, W. A. Lamborn, St. Aubyn Rogers, Hale Carpenter, V. G. L. van Someren, C. F. M. Swynnerton and others in Africa ; by the experiments conducted by some of these naturalists, and also by H. B. Cott and R. Carrick, and in the United States by Morton Jones. It is interesting to remember that a paper by two American entomologists 2 was among the first to accept and support by fresh observations the conclusions brought forward by H. W. Bates in his great memoir on the mimetic butterflies of the Amazon Valley,” and that one of the authors treated the same subject more completely in a later paper ** much appreciated by Darwin.” It is also important to remember that the above-mentioned con- clusions have been reached by the study of marine animals no less than terrestrial, as was shown by Herdman in his address to Sec- tion D at Glasgow in 1go1, and by his experiments communicated to the same Section at Ipswich in 1895 ; also that Garstang, with his very long and intimate experience of marine life, adopts the same interpretation of colour and form with the associated attitudes and movements. If time permitted it would be possible to speak of numerous papers on mimicry and the related subjects which have been brought before our meetings. It is impossible to attempt this now, but many will feel with me that the name of the late Dr. F. A. Dixey should not be forgotten—one who attended so regularly, so often read papers at our meetings, presided over Section D at Bournemouth in 1919, lectured at Leicester in 1907, always giving the results yielded by the study of his favourite insects, and their interpretation by the theory of natural selection ; also one who delighted in the social gatherings of his Section, where his rendering of Widdicombe Fair will be long remembered. In my concluding remarks I am anxious to refer to a very interesting and encouraging subject—the feeling for animals and the care for their welfare to-day, as contrasted with the treatment they received a hundred years ago and even in the youth of many among us. Only last autumn The Times of October 12, reported that 1,000 swallows had arrived at Venice ‘ sent there by bird-lovers from Vienna and Munich in order to save them from the effects of #2 Walsh and Riley: The American Entomologist, St. Louis, Mo., 1869, vol. i, p. 189. 23 Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., vol. xxiii, 1862, p. 495. 24 Riley: Third Annual Report on the Noxious . . . Insects of . . . Missouri, TS7l, Ds AZ. 25 Charles Darwin and the Theory of Natural Selection (Poulton, 1896), p. 202. 22 THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS the cold weather. Soon after their arrival they were set free and flew south along the Adriatic coast.’ And a little earlier the writer of the amusing * Fourth Leader’ referred to a meeting of the Society for the Preservation of the Fauna of the Empire at which the care of the opossum was discussed, comparing this with the report of happenings a hundred years earlier when there was a ‘ humorous debate ’ at the Zoological Society ‘ about puffing cigar-smoke into the cages of the monkeys,’ to their evident discomfort. The writer, yielding too far, we hope, to the depression of the present day, con- cludes: ‘The world, it may be, is “‘ man-sick”’ and yearning to be rid of a bad mistake. But the creature cannot be wholly vile when instead of torturing monkeys it takes thought for the opossum.’ It would not be right to quote from a century-old report without speaking of all that is done and has been done during many years for the care and health of animals by the great London Society and its branch at Whipsnade, and in doing this, for the education and happiness of our people. But the change of which I have spoken is most deeply impressed on those who remember, as many of us do, the misdirected hours in youth when birds were shot in our gardens and brick traps made to catch them. I feel sure that those who did these things are not essentially different from their children and grandchildren who have grown up in a kinder atmosphere. I must not occupy more time on a subject which to some may seem in- appropriate, but it is bound up with education in its true sense— the detection and training of unrecognised ability—and if, as Sir Ray Lankester said at York, and we are all coming to believe, the hidden powers within are inherited while the results of their develop- ment are not, then there is no easing of the burden with the passage of time, but each generation afresh must bear the heavy responsi- bility of conducting this development in the best way so that its successor may be able to meet the changing and, at this time, the increasing needs. ‘The relationship between the powers within and their development was suggested in arresting words by the late Prof. Scott Holland: ‘To say that a man cannot be made good by Act of Parliament is such an obvious truth that people forget what an outrageous lie it is!’ Thoughts on the development of these hidden powers by the educating influence of social environment, suggest the greatest of the problems by which we are faced—the end of international war. Sir Michael Foster, in his Address at Dover in 1899, after speaking of progress in the material of warfare was led to believe that, ‘ happily, the very greatness of the modern power of destruction is already becoming a bar to its use, and bids fair—may we hope before long ?>— wholly to putan end toit; in the words of Tacitus, though in another THE PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 23 sense, the very preparations for war, through the character which science gives them, make for peace.’ And in his concluding pages he expressed the hope that the brotherly meeting between the English and French Associations at Dover and Boulogne might be looked upon as a sign that science, by nobler means than the develop- ment of armaments, was steadily working towards the same great end. And, in a time of still greater need and perplexity, may we not, in the same hopeful spirit, look upon the recent visit by which members of the French Association have honoured us, and feel strengthened in the belief that the great end will be reached. There are, I know, very many people who look upon the Great War with later wars and rumours of wars as the close of Sir Michael Foster’s dream. The words in which Sir Arthur Schuster concluded his address at Manchester in 1915, and Sir Edward Thorpe at Edin- burgh in 1921, indicate, I hope, that the British Association does not thus despair, and in this belief I bring before you a passage from the far earlier address which Sir Richard Owen delivered to the Twenty-eighth Meeting at Leeds in 1858—a passage which makes a special appeal at a time when the British and American Associa- tions are confidently hoping to strengthen still further the bonds of sympathy and mutual appreciation by which they have been happily united for so many years. Referring to the transatlantic telegraph Sir Richard said : “We may confidently hope that this and other applications of pure science will tend to abolish wars over the whole earth ; so that men may come to look back upon the trial of battle between mis- understanding nations, as a sign of a past state of comparative barbarism ; just as we look back from our present phase of civilisation in England upon the old border warfare.’ Confident words inspired by the forging of a new link between the two great English-speaking nations. Nearly eighty years have passed since they were spoken, but with all the terrible disappoint- ments there has been great progress, and a time will surely come, and may it come quickly, a time which shall prove that the visions of the young and the dreams of the old were prophetic of a glorious reality. Rermag ei 8 te Sh as a f. messinyat bans ’ “ > er 5 ban i aie gay rue ie Hawa este ard wake os ee oh iy a ti th 0 $a chats i use 1% 14 ; Pa ¥ , SECTION A.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES. NOISE AND THE NATION ADDRESS BY Ga We (RAYE, O-B.E. M.A.) D-SC., PRESIDENT OF THE SECTION. Appited Physics and related Matters Acoustics and the British Association Notse and the Nation. The Measurement of Noise. The Decibel and the Phon. Noise Meters. (i) Subjective Noise Meters. (ii) Objective Noise Meters. The Analysis of Noise. Noise Level Measurements. Noise on the Railway. Noise in the Air. Noise on the Road. (i) Ministry of Transport Tests. (ii) Tests on New Motor Vehicles. (iii) Tests on ‘ Used’ Motor Vehicles. (iv) Summary of Tests. (v) Motor Horns. (vi) Pneumatic Road Drills. The Abatement of Noise. Quiet Housing. (i) The Insulation of Walls and Windows. (ii) The Insulation of Floors. (iii) Sound Absorbent Treatment of Rooms. APPLIED PHYSICS AND RELATED MATTERS. TueERE is a feeling, which of late years has been gathering strength, that the primary concern of the British Association should be to bring home to the community how much its welfare and its interests owe, and are likely to owe in the future, to science and its developments. Our President at Blackpool last year emphasised this outlook in his address on ‘The Impact of Science on Society’; and we in Section A have thought it well this Coronation year to devote the greater part of our proceedings to some of the beneficent influences of applied physics on the complex social and industrial life of the nation. We feel that in 26 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES these disturbed days science should have a message of goodwill to the world ; and to such a message, fortified at each of our sessions by practical demonstration, we have put our hand at this sectional gathering, now meeting for the third time in the great industrial city of Nottingham. A generation ago it was fashionable to draw a working distinction between the applied and pure physicist, it being considered that when given a piece of research to carry out, the former consciously or un- consciously applied Benjamin Franklin’s stock question ‘ What is the use of it?’ Nowadays it is appreciated that any such distinction can only be largely artificial, for there have been many outstanding illustrations during the last half century of how speedily and inevitably results of no preconceived practical value may glide into widespread industrial utilities. For example, when only forty years ago Sir. J. J. Thomson discovered the electron, no one could ever have imagined that, as Dr. K. T. Compton recently informed us, an industrial business amounting to some hundreds of millions of pounds a year would now owe its existence to electronic devices. Already, both neutrons and radio-sodium are being experi- mented with in radiation therapy ; and furthermore, some of the artificial radioactive elements have found an important field of use in biological processes, both in animals and plants, providing, as they do, by their characteristic radioactive decay, a method of identifying migrating atoms a million times more sensitive than any that analytical chemistry can offer. Again, to judge by the 1936 report of the Comptroller-General of the Patent Office, technical applications are also being sought for the trans- mutation of elements by bombardment with short-wave radiation or high-speed particles. Thus even the most practically minded among us need find no diffi- culty in appreciating the profound fascination and basic significance of some of the present-day developments of modern physics, and recog- nising the driving genius behind them. But applied physics has its victories no less than pure physics; and speaking as one who has spent some thirty happy years in both the pure and applied schools of physical research, I can testify that dealing with materials which are neither intangible nor ephemeral, does not necessarily cramp outlook or stifle enthusiasm ; and applied workers are no less able to share the stimulus of conquering a stubborn investigation, and with it all, enjoy the satis- , faction of seeing many of their labours turned to early account in the interests of the community. Perhaps some day they will also take to heart some of the social implications of their work. There must be many of us, both workers and onlookers, who at times feel a little overwhelmed by the way the ramifications of physical research year by year continue to extend. Not uncommonly, the methods of attack are so involved and the technique so formidable, that despite the great all-round improvements in equipment, the calls on the pertinacity and patience of the worker are no less than in the past. Incidentally, while present-day equipment is often much more elaborate and efficient, it is also apt to be much more costly than that of a generation ago, as those who direct physical laboratories are well aware. ‘This applies alike to the pure and the applied physics laboratory; and although their A.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 27 immediate objectives are usually very different, one finds, for example, in both the Cavendish and National Physical Laboratories, ample illustration of how large-scale and expensive apparatus has entered into both classes of physical investigation. Such apparatus is likely to be beyond the compass of the private research worker, who at one time cut a conspicuous figure in the scientific annals of this country, but who, with a few noteworthy exceptions, has now regrettably disappeared. Progress in industrial research, at any rate, seems to be more and more bound up with specialised team attack, whether to solve a specific problem or to develop a new invention or product. There is one other matter to which I would like to refer. It has been claimed in some quarters that man’s qualities of leadership are more likely to be developed by the older humanitarian studies than by the natural or mechanical sciences ‘The dictum has doubtless the defects of all such generalisations, and more to the point, perhaps, is the sum- ming up of John Drinkwater, that ‘the minds of men mostly belong to one or other of two kinds—the kind that wishes to dominate, and the kind that desires to understand.’ Experience tempts one to hazard the view that the proportion of men who naturally seek leadership or administrative responsibility is small, possibly one in twenty or even less. Provided, however, the germs of initiative and common sense are there, the value of research in getting a man into the way of thinking for him- self and developing a courageous and discriminating outlook is not to be questioned. It is to be hoped that the penetration into the major industries of scientifically trained young men, whose mental equipment is such as to fit them later on for responsible administrative jobs, is some- thing which the Universities regard as of high national importance. In its turn, industry must play a part by recognising the advantages of admitting the pick of such men into the Board room more commonly than in the traditional past. Power without knowledge is a well-worn and discredited experiment in this country; and the conception that technical or scientific workers invariably require to be mothered by full-blooded non-scientific or quasi-scientific administrators is manifestly so much moonshine. Before leaving the subject, I may perhaps comment on what I believe to be a weakness of a good many thoroughly capable men who come to an appointment fresh from a University and armed with an Honours science degree and perhaps a little research experience ; that is, a diffi- culty in setting down their ideas and conclusions on paper concisely and logically and in reasonably good English, whether in letter or report. We must not, of course, expect to find old heads on young shoulders, but I feel sure that some sort of intensive course to cover these points ought to form a part of young people’s University training ; or perhaps we ought to insist on a more thorough grounding, particularly in English, before specialisation in science is allowed to begin. As it is, the drafting of a scientific paper by a beginner is liable to be an ordeal which is, I think, best tempered by the system of joint publication with a senior man, the experience being not only valuable educationally but often an eye- opener for both parties. 28 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES AcousTICS AND THE BRITISH ASSOCIATION. In passing to the subject matter of this Address, I may perhaps mention that a search through the Reports of the Association reveals that through- out its entire existence of over a hundred years, no previous Presidential Address in Section A has dealt with acoustical matters. Neither can I find a precedent for an experimental address such as I am venturing to offer you to-day. It is fitting that the subject of acoustics should occupy us in this lecture theatre, which was one of Prof. Barton’s last achievements. During the course of the search, one could not fail to be impressed by the galaxy of distinguished mathematicians and physicists who have presided over our Section in the past. Here is a random selection of pre-war names: Brewster, Herschel, Forbes, Stokes, Airy, Rankine, Cayley, Wheatsone, Tyndall, Maxwell, Tait, Balfour Stewart, Lord Kelvin, Carey Foster, Johnstone Stoney, the late Lord Rayleigh, Chrystal, G. H. Darwin, Fitzgerald, Sir Oliver Lodge, Schuster, Glazebrook, Riicker, Hicks, Sir J. J. Thomson, Prof. Forsyth, Poynting, Larmor, Sir Chas. Boys, Lamb, Sir Napier Shaw, Lord Rutherford, Hobson, Turner, Callendar, Baker, Sir Frank Dyson and Prof. Whitehead. Except for two war years (1917 and 1918), the British Association has never failed to meet annually, nor has the Section omitted to play its part. Since the war, we find further names no less eminent: Andrew Gray, Prof. O. W. Richardson, Prof. G. H. Hardy, McLennan, Sir Wm. Bragg, Sir George Simpson, Prof. Porter, Prof. Whittaker, Prof. A. Fowler, Lord Rayleigh, Sir Frank Smith, Sir J. J. Thomson, Prof. Rankine, Sir Gilbert Walker, Macdonald, Dr. Aston and Prof. Ferguson. It was not until 1843 (twelve years after the inaugural year of the British Association) that the first Presidential Address was given to the Section of Mathematics and Physics by M‘Cullagh. His lead was by no means always followed in subsequent years, and even when it was, the address had clearly assumed no particular moment. Stokes’s Sectional address in 1862 seems to have occupied about four minutes, while Whewell, the renowned Master of Trinity, in the course of a brief address four years earlier at Leeds, lamented the small size of the meeting room, but on reflection thought it might suffice, as ‘ we in this Section are very much in the habit of treating our subjects in so sublime a manner that we thin the room very speedily.’ Since about 1868, the Sectional programme has invariably included a Presidential Address, though over a long period it was given no title. Lord Kelvin, ever a stalwart supporter of the British Association, was the first to supply a title (in 1876) and kept up the practice in his later addresses, his example being followed by Sir Robert Ball in 1887. But the innovation found no other supporters, and it was not until 1911 that Prof. Turner adopted a title; since 1920 the Presidential Addresses in Section A have all borne titles. As regards the two previous Nottingham meetings, at the first of these in 1866, Wheatstone apparently dispensed with a Sectional Address ; while at the second meeting in 1893, the late Sir Richard Glazebrook gave an address on optical theories and the ether. Those who then A.—_MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 29 contributed papers included Fitzgerald, the late Lord Rayleigh, Oliver Lodge, Lord Kelvin, Barton, Larmor, Carey Foster, Viriamu Jones, and J. J. Thomson. During the first fifty years of the Association, it was not uncommon for the Sectional Presidency to be held on more than one occasion by the same man, viz. Whewell and Lord Kelvin were each elected President on five occasions while Brewster, Herschel, the Earl of Rosse, Forbes, Stokes and the then Dean of Ely each held the office twice. Since 1884 it has become the practice for the Sectional Chair to be occupied by a newcomer. To this, there has been only one, though a very notable exception, namely Sir J. J. Thomson, who presided in 1896 and again at the memorable Centenary meeting in London in 1931. That acoustics was long the Cinderella of the physical sciences is apparent from the sustained Presidential cold-shoulder, though even in the very earliest meetings the subject was not without its supporters. At the second meeting, at Oxford in 1832, Wheatstone read two papers on acoustics, one of them experimental. The Rev. Mr. Wills also gave “An Account of the Recent Additions to our Knowledge of the Phzeno- mena of Sound,’ though it is recorded that the printing of the paper was deferred ; which seems to have been a polite way of shelving it ! At the 1834 meeting, there was a paper by Addams on ‘A New Phenomenon of Sonorous Interference’ which was accompanied by an experimental demonstration. In the following year at Dublin, there were no fewer than four acoustical papers, including one by Wheatstone ‘On the various Attempts which have been made to imitate Human Speech by Mechanical Means,’ while in a remarkably penetrating paper ‘On the Construction of Public Buildings in reference to the Com- munication of Sound,’ Dr. Reid of Edinburgh recognised reverberation as the most prevalent acoustic defect of large rooms and explained how it could be reduced by excluding superfluous space by hanging draperies, or by making the walls more absorbent through greater roughness or irregularity. He also condemned concave surfaces as promoting uneven distribution of sound. Thus the prime and vital factors of good archi- tectural acoustics were clearly recognised as long as a century ago, but did not reach the ear of the architectural profession, so that countless halls with poor acoustics have since been, and still are being erected. The British Association of to-day aims at a more effective publicity in all such matters of general concern. Tyndall, during his Sectional Presidency in 1868, gave evidence before a Select Committee on the acoustics of the House of Commons, stressing the value of a low ceiling as a reinforcing device, and the beneficial influence of an audience (as in the Cambridge Senate House) or of draperies in quenching the after-sound in a room. Again, Johnstone Stoney, who was Sectional President in 1879, described in 1885 a method of treating walls to free concert halls or public rooms from echo effects. It was the late Lord Rayleigh, our Sectional President in 1882, to whom with Helmholtz we owe the enduring foundations of a great deal of modern acoustics. Kelvin never said a truer thing when he remarked that progress in a science hinges on measurement; this indeed is the 30 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES keynote of the new motto of the British Association ‘Sed omnia dis- posuisti ’’ (But Thou hast ordered all things in measure and number and weight.) Rayleigh was almost alone in his day in improvising with rare simplicity and skill measuring devices in acoustics. But in many ways his voice was one crying in the wilderness, for until the telephone came into general use, acoustics had been of little service to the people, and there was small interest in the subject at either schools or Universities. Many of us will recall the shabby treatment meted out to sound in the physics curricula of those days. The touchstone came with the thermionic valve, which led to electrical methods of measurement and so to higher precision, as elsewhere in physics. The gramophone, wireless, broadcasting and the talking pictures followed each other in succession ; and now acoustics, far from being a Cinderella, has become a radiant Princess of physics in whose career the public interest has become completely enchained. Her ‘ open sesame ’ revealed the interior of the Abbey last May to countless millions, who were vouchsafed a vivid acoustic imagery of the Coronation cere- mony. For such technical miracles, no praise can be too high for the skilled army of technical and industrial workers who see to it that developments in invention, equipment and technique follow each other like a river in spate. The literature is immense, and I can only surmise that the commercial value of applied acoustics must run into many millions of pounds. At any rate, I can testify, as its Chairman, that a Committee of the British Standards Institution was occupied for nearly two years in the careful scrutiny and compilation of a glossary of the large and steadily expanding acoustical terminology. So much acoustical research is now being carried out, that an authoritative glossary, par- ticularly in the matter of units, is manifestly of the first importance in the comparison of experimental results from different laboratories and the application of such data to engineering acoustics. Sound has become a marketable commodity the cultural and political developments of which, particularly in regard to broadcasting, are not easy to envisage. NOISE AND THE NATION. Simultaneously with these developments in applied acoustics, there has gradually developed in this country a public consciousness of the insidious growth of the social evil of needless noise—a pernicious by- product attributable in great part to an increasingly mechanised civilisa- tion. With this growing realisation, the nation is beginning to demand and to receive protection against the nuisance of outrageous noise whether generated by private or public bodies. It is looking for ways and means of mitigating excessive transport noises particularly on the road and in the air, and it is seeking to know why in modern houses or flats it should not be accorded adequate privacy against the natural though sometimes unreasonable noises of neighbours. All this is not to say that John Citizen cherishes the ideal of a completely silent world, for due noise in due season unquestionably contributes to the spice of life. It should indeed be emphasised that in this matter he A.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 31 is not crying for the moon. The most he needs ask of a particular locality is that its background of noise, whether by day or night, shall be suited to the environment and the reasonable habits of a majority of its occupants. In this matter of noise abatement, the British Association has played a leading part, through the intermediary of both this Section and the Engineering Section which set up a Noise Committee in 1933. The subject has since become one of international concern, as is evidenced by the formation of a League of Nations Commission which held its first meeting at Geneva in June this year, and over which I had the honour to preside. On the question of what constitutes a noise, it is difficult to generalise. The countryman votes the noises of the city as disturbing to a degree, nor does the townsman necessarily find a lullaby in the noises peculiar to the countryside. Many offending noises owe their origin to ill-timed activities or pure thoughtlessness. The young person hearing the raucous horn with which a friend announces his arrival has no doubt as to its character: neither has the invalid next door. A hearer is in fact patently influenced by psychological and other factors such as_ back- ground, environment or force of association. There are those, moreover, who have no hesitation in regarding any sound made by some one else as an objectionable noise, while in contrast there are others who seem quite immune to noise and incidentally behave as if they find silence intolerable. Healthy children obviously revel in noise, at any rate of their own making, and the observation appears to apply to many of a larger growth who are in exuberant health, not excluding the Latin races. The prejudicial effects of certain extremely noisy occupations on the hearing are recognised, but it would appear that the noises encountered in ordinary everyday life are unlikely to impair the hearing, though there is some evidence that in certain types of work they may adversely affect human efficiency. Most mental workers and particularly mathematicians would agree, I think, that noise is an impossible environment to work in. But while many forthright statements have been made about the effects of noise—and no one would withhold sympathy from those unfortunates whose sleep is regularly violated by noise—the root of the matter is probably that for a good many people noise aggravates rather than initiates psychological distress, being a sort of ‘ last straw’ for the sick, the fatigued, or the highly strung. The emotionally stable, on the other hand, have clearly a considerable power of accommodation and can get so used to certain classes of noise as never to notice them, though, were the noises arrested, they would not only quickly miss them but might even, on occasion, confess to an unexpected feeling of relief. Without doubt then, while there are noises in the world so inappropriate or outrageous as to raise protest alike from the average hearer, the relatively immune, or the hypersensitive, there are equally many border-line sounds on which we should expect them to express very different opinions. In some recent annoyance tests on motor horns at the National Physical Laboratory, in which some two or three hundred observers were employed, it was interesting to note the divergency of views under like conditions of hearing. There was, it is true, a considerable consensus of opinion in 32 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES most cases, but a proportion of the observers would as blithely vote the noise of a particular horn as very objectionable as others would just as cheerfully class it as tolerable or agreeable. ‘The experiments, in fact, supported the view that the appraisement of noise is a matter of personal opinion ; and this aspect is endorsed by the British Standard Glossary which defines noise as ‘ sound undesired by the recipient.’ Small blame then if some of us find it difficult to distinguish between noise and certain modern music. Complaints against noise are of course an old story, probably as old as civilisation itself. While the acoustic conditions in the Ark do not appear to have been put on record, there are numerous later Biblical references to noise: Moses speaks of the ‘ noise of them that sing,’ David refers to ‘the noise of water spouts ’ and elsewhere enjoins us to ‘ sing and make a joyful noise,’ while Jeremiah bemoans that ‘ The noise is come . . . to make the cities of Judah desolate and a den of dragons.’ Juvenal wrote (A.D. 47) of the cost of buying sleep in Rome owing to the noise of herds of cattle and rumbling waggons in the narrow winding streets. The Oxford Dictionary gives a reference to ‘ noyse’ dating from 1297: ‘ Of trompes and of tabors ye sarazins made here so gret noyse that cristinemen al destourbed were.’ The clatter of the medieval town provoked restrictive regulations ; we find embargoes on nocturnal horn blowing and wife beating in Elizabeth’s reign. The tumult of the streets is well illustrated by a picture painted by Hogarth in 1741. In some towns in Germany noisy occupations were zoned, though it is on record that Christian Thomasius (born 1655) objected to the privilege of the learned professions of driving from the neighbourhood noisy craftsmen, e.g. blacksmiths and musicians : he held the view that those living in a city should accustom themselves to its noise. Frederick the Great’s famous and unsuccessful protest against the noise of the Mill of Sans Souci will be recalled. A hundred years ago, Jane Austen was graphically describing the traffic bedlam of Bath. Complaints from City churches of the noise of stage coaches were common in those days; many of us are of course well aware of how noisy steel tyres and horse shoes can be on cobbles or stone or granite setts, and how great was the measure of relief which came with the introduction of the pneumatic tyre. THE MEASUREMENT OF NOISE. It is common knowledge that most noises are complex in character, containing a variety of components which may be distributed over the entire auditory ranges of frequency and intensity. Such a physical constitution lends itself to objective measurement and analysis, but there are, in addition, subjective factors of prime importance to the listener, viz. pitch, timbre and loudness, and these sensations are not readily appraisable. Experience indicates, however, that while the composition of a noise is not to be ignored, sheer loudness is the determining factor in most cases of annoyance caused by noise, so that the problem largely resolves itself into the correlation of the sensation of noisiness (as assessed A.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES ag by the ear) with the associated energy, which can be quantitatively measured by physical instruments. Let us first consider the measurement of acoustical energy. For the purpose, we need an intensity meter, this commonly consisting of a microphone and amplifier together with a suitable rectifier and indicator. Moving-coil or ribbon microphones are sometimes employed, though for fundamental work the condenser or the crystal microphone is preferred despite the lower sensitivity. Whatever the microphone used, it is usually calibrated by direct interchange comparison under appropriate conditions with a standard (pressure) microphone of the condenser type which in turn has been fundamentally calibrated in absolute units by means of either the Rayleigh disc or the pistonphone. The Rayleigh disc depends for its operation on the tendency of a small thin glass disc suspended from its edge by a fine fibre to set itself at right angles to a sound field. The torsional constants of the system and the degree of deflection of the disc afford the sound particle velocity, the corresponding sound pressure being calculable from the known relations in the field. The measurements are made either in a stationary-wave pipe or in a room with highly absorbent walls. The piston-phone, which measures sound pressures directly, consists essentially of a small cavity, one face of which is closed by the diaphragm of the standard microphone, the opposite face consisting of a small piston connected to the moving coil of a loudspeaker unit. The amplitude of motion of the piston, when it is set in vibration, is measured optically and enables the corresponding sound pressures in the cavity to be calculated. So much for intensity measurements. As regards the associated loudness levels, we turn to auditory diagrams of the ear, such as those of Fletcher and Munson (1933). The various loudness contours for pure tones of different frequencies show that while loudness and energy are manifestly related, the two do not normally keep in step, particularly for notes of very high and very low frequencies. At feeble intensities, the ear exercises pronounced selective preference for notes of medium frequency and it is only at high intensities that equal increments of energy produce even approximately equal increments of loudness, Furthermore, the thresholds of hearing are much higher for high and low frequencies, so that the corresponding ranges of intensity with which the ear can deal, are more restricted than for notes of medium frequency. The situation is worsened in the case of complex sounds or noises since the loudness is affected by their character, there being in general no simple relation between the loudness of a noise and the energy- loudness characteristics of its several components. It is evident that an energy meter, such as a microphone system, cannot unreservedly be used as a direct measurer of loudness. THE DECIBEL AND THE PHON. The next step in the measurement of noise is to equip ourselves with units and standards of loudness. In this connection, we have to cater for the enormous intensity range of the ear, particularly for notes of medium Cc 34 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES frequency, where the greatest intensity that can be tolerated (the threshold of pain) is some 10 million million (101%) times that corresponding to the threshold of hearing. In such circumstances, we turn, as always, to a geometrical rather than an arithmetical scale, and the unit adopted for the purpose is the be/, which is a ratio signifying a 10-fold increase in intensity, power, or energy. Two bels signify a 100-fold increase, three bels a 1000-fold increase, and so on. Equipped with such seven-league boots, and starting at a zero approxi- mating to the threshold of hearing, we can traverse the entire auditory intensity range for a medium-frequency note, in as few as thirteen geometrically progressive steps. But the steps are too big for practical convenience, and so it is usual to speak of a range of 130 decibels, which provides a serviceable energy scale. Arithmetically, a decibel (db) denotes approximately a 5/4 energy increase (i.e, antilog 1/10), two decibels a (5/4) increase, three decibels a (5/4) =a 2-fold increase, . . . 10 decibels a (5/4)!° =a 10-fold increase, i.e. a bel. More generally, two similar sounds of intensities J and J, and corresponding acoustical pressures p and py are said to differ in intensity by 2 decibels when n = 10 log 49 (J/Ip) or 2 = 20 log 4 (p/Po) If I, or py corresponds to some selected zero, then m becomes the number of decibels above that zero level. Thus provided with an acoustical intensity scale, we can proceed to set up a loudness scale which is based on the accepted ability of the average individual to compare and match loudness. To this end (just as in photometry we make use of a standard candle) we need a standard sound ; and for the purpose a pure reference tone is chosen which, on the British Standard Scale, has a frequency of 1000 cycles per second. We also require a zero of loudness at or near the threshold of hearing, and this is arbitrarily adopted as corresponding to a pressure of 0-0002 dyne per sq.cm. If now we operate the reference tone by successively increasing decibel steps of energy, the associated changes of loudness are expressed in numerically identical steps on a scale of phons. That is, if the reference tone is excited by an intensity of » decibels above the zero, the loudness is 2 phons. The equivalent loudness of any other sound or noise is evaluated by matching it by ear under specified conditions against the suitably adjusted reference tone, the numerical value of the latter in phons then giving the equivalent loudness of the sound to be measured. Thus by this procedure we have set up a subjective scale of equivalent loudness, the unit being the phon. It happens that a phon corresponds roughly to the smallest difference of loudness which can be detected by alternate listening, in the case of a sound of medium frequency and moderate loudness. Experience shows, too, that for many loud noises of common occurrence the loudness level in phons is approximately equal to the intensity level in decibels—a convenient relation for many purposes. A number of different zeros of loudness have unfortunately been employed in the past, e.g. 1 millidyne per sq. cm., which results in A—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES a5 numerical values of loudness some 14 phons less than with the British Standard zero. In Germany the phon is based on a zero of 0:0003 dyne per sq. cm. which is equivalent to a 4 db. difference from the B.S. zero. As, however, a different method of listening is employed, the slight discrepancy between the two scales is not known exactly. The American scale agrees with the British, except that in the States it is customary to use the decibel not only for expressing intensity measurements, but also for loudness levels, it being implied in the latter case that the decibel figure quoted refers to the energy level (above the arbitrary zero) of the standard tone when it matches the sound to be measured. As already mentioned, the British Standards Institution recommends that for greater clarity the decibel should be restricted to energy ratios ; and in its defini- tion of the phon, the Institution kept open the way for eventual inter- national agreement on the unit of equivalent loudness. Happily such agreement came about at an international conference held in Paris last July, when it was unanimously agreed that the decibel and the phon should be adopted respectively as international units of intensity level and equivalent loudness, full agreement being secured on questions of the reference tone (1000 cycles per second), the reference zero (0:0002 dyne per sq. cm.) and the technique of listening. All these matters are in accord with the definitions in the acoustical glossary of the British Standards Institution. The phon, which has already proved of great service in many classes of noise measurement in this country, came in the nick of time to meet ‘the present demand for noise abatement: the ability to measure is of course vital to such a movement. I may perhaps refer to the public interest which was excited when the decibel and the phon were introduced into everyday language. Mr. Punch made play with the decibel, anxiously enquiring ‘ how many decibels it took to talk the hind leg off a donkey’ ; while W. R. in the Observer was moved to welcome the phon in the following terms :— ‘Hail! newest unit, welcome to the host Of ergs and amperes, kilowatts and therms, Best of the lot, you shall be valued most Among these unintelligible terms. For you alone can make men realise, In figures plain, the awful din they make, So that at last some genius may devise A means of curbing it, for Reason’s sake.’ The experimental realisation of the fundamental scale of phons is one for the standardising laboratory, as will be appreciated from the subjoined definition of the phon taken from the British Standard Glossary of Acoustical Terms and Definitions, 1936 (No. 661). For example, the specification of a free progressive wave postulates an acoustical environ- ment corresponding to infinite space, which in practice can only be conveniently simulated by placing the ‘normal observer’ (in practice 36 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES the average of a trained group of observers) in an experimental chamber with highly absorbent walls. Furthermore, while it may be possible in the fundamental evaluation of the equivalent loudnesses of sounds or noises in phons, for certain sources to be accommodated in the lagged test chamber, it may not be practicable in other cases, whether on the score of size or the impossibility of quickly starting and stopping the source, so as to permit alternate listening with the reference tone. In such cases, the sources have to remain outside the chamber and the sounds are transmitted at will to the observer inside by means of a micro- phone and loudspeaker system. A closer specification of the measuring technique is at present being developed by the British Standards Institution. ‘ Phon (B.S.). A unit of equivalent loudness, defined as follows : The standard tone shall be a plane sinusoidal sound wave train coming from a position directly in front of the observer and having a frequency of 1000 cycles per second. ‘The listening shall be done with both ears, the standard tone and the sound under measurement being heard alternately and the standard tone being adjusted until it is judged by a normal observer to be as loud as the sound under measurement. The intensity level of-the standard tone shall be measured in the free progressive wave. ‘The reference level shall be taken to be that corresponding to an R.M.S. sound pressure of 0-0002 dyne per sq. cm. When, under the above conditions, the intensity level of the standard tone is m decibels above the stated reference. intensity, the sound under measurement is said to have an equivalent loudness of 2 phons (B.S.).’ Reference may here be made to the criticism to which the phon scale has been subjected in some quarters, in that it does not interpret numerically one’s sensations of loudness, a phon near the top of the scale admittedly signifying a much bigger step than it does near the bottom. Some workers in this country and the States have accordingly attempted to set up a subjective scale of loudness units in which the assumption is made that fractional estimation by an observer is possible, so that, for example, it is claimed he can say when one sound is twice as loud as another. A comparison of the mean scale so derived with the phon scale suggests that such an estimated doubling of loudness is equivalent to an increase of about 10 phons for moderately loud sounds. While, however, the scale of equivalent loudness in phons may not be subjectively ideal, it does rest on sound physical foundations and accepted subjective principles. Furthermore the connection of the phon scale with the decibel scale is of great practical value to the acoustical engineer, for example in dealing with the transmission of air-borne sounds by walls. Noise METERS. It will be appreciated that the experimental conditions laid down for the fundamental evaluation of sounds or noises in phons, are rarely likely to be available for noise measurements in everyday circumstances, and A—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 37 simpler techniques have accordingly been evolved which make portable noise meters feasible for field conditions. ‘There are two main types of meter on the market, namely subjective meters, which were first developed by Barkhausen, and objective meters utilising a microphone and amplifier system. At the National Physical Laboratory, the calibration of such meters in phons is effected in lagged chambers by means of sounds of known phon values, for example, pure tones of various frequencies, and gramophone, synthetic or other reproductions of a variety of noises such as the meter may be called upon to measure in practice. The British Standards Institution is at present engaged in developing specifications of noise meters designed to conform to the B.S. scale of phons, and, in the meantime, purchasers of noise meters would do well to demand a calibration certificate by an accepted testing authority. (i) Subjective noise meters.—Subjective noise meters depend on the equality matching of the loudness of a noise, as heard by the ear, with a reference tone (usually a pure tone of specified frequency and of graduated intensity) as heard in a telephone earpiece held tightly against one ear. The reference tone may be produced by an electric buzzer, valve oscillator or other means, various frequencies (e.g. 1,000 or 800 cycles per sec.) or mixed tones being used in commercial instruments. The usual Barkhausen technique involves simultaneous listening of the noise and the reference tone, but experience indicates that inconsistencies which are found to arise in aural measurements under such conditions are largely resolved when the two sounds are heard alternately for periods of not less than a second. Such a technique has been facilitated by Churcher in a subjective meter employing two earpieces, so that either the noise or the reference tone can be heard in turn using both ears simultaneously. Subjective meters are useful for certain purposes, but the aural judging of equality of loudness of the reference tone and of a noise very different in character is not always easy. Observers are found to differ widely in their judgments and the same individual is not always consistent. The accuracy of appraisement of a single observer is normally low (say 5 phons) and a team of trained observers is essential for higher precision (say 2 phons). In the case of unexpected or single impulsive sounds, the aural assessment presents great difficulties to the average observer. (ii) Objective noise meters —The problem of the designing of objective sound and noise meters, which has received much attention both in this country and abroad, is of considerable complexity. The ideal aimed at by objective meters is to be able to measure every type of sound and noise on the subjective scale of phons, that is to simulate the selectiveness and response of the average ear in all circumstances. The various objective meters on the market all consist essentially of a pressure microphone connected to an amplifier provided with calibrated control, followed by some type of rectifier and an output indicator. As a first essential, objective meters are constructed to give the same reading for a range of steady pure tones which sound equally loud to the ear whatever the frequency. This is achieved by introducing into the amplifier electrical networks designed to modify the shape of the frequency characteristic so that it imitates the ear sensitivity at selected loudness 38 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES levels. If the network is omitted, the meter measures intensity levels. Objective meters should be further designed to simulate the salient characteristics of the ear in dealing with either steady or impulsive sounds. For example, the ear does not record full strength until a steady sound has persisted for about one-fifth of a second, and in the case of pulsating sounds, the inertia of the instrument has to be of the right order to give readings corresponding to average aural appraisement. The practice has developed in certain countries of constructing objective meters to arbitrary specifications (which include quadratic rectification and certain instrumental requirements), the meters being ostensibly designed to deal with pure tones and certain common types of sound. ‘The readings, which are sometimes referred to as ‘ sound levels,’ are not claimed as conforming necessarily to subjective equivalent loud- nesses. Experimental calibrations of such meters show, however, that while they may give results in reasonable agreement with subjective measurements in the case of steady pure tones or other sounds, they afford readings in the case of particular types of intermittent noise (such as certain machinery or traffic noises) which are considerably lower than equivalent loudnesses as measured by the fundamental method. It was agreed at the international acoustical conference in Paris last July that it was undesirable that a meter should be used for measuring the equivalent loudness of sounds unless it has been shown, by calibration in an accepted standardising laboratory, to give results, for the particular sounds in ques- tion, which are in reasonable accordance with the subjective scale of phons. The difficulty of dealing with intermittent sounds can, it appears, be met by replacing the quadratic rectifier by one of the leaking peak variety. Portable objective meters of this type have been designed by Davis at the National Physical Laboratory and independently in Switzerland. The former instrument has recently emerged successfully from a pro- longed series of tests on the equivalent loudness of a wide variety of noises, including continuous, warbling, and impulsive short-duration sounds (recurring at rates of from 12 to 50 per second), as well as the noises of motor cars, motor cycles and motor horns. For moderate or loud noises, the measurements were found to agree more closely with the average aural appraisements of a group of observers than did those of any one of the observers. The leaking peak rectifier enables the rates of integration and decay to be adjusted empirically so that the meter simulates the response of the ear in giving higher results for rapidly recurring impulses than for slowly recurring or single impulses. For example, the loudness of a single impulse may be nearly 10 phons less than if 30 to 50 such impulses occur per second. Experiments designed to formulate a specification of the physical behaviour of the meter are not yet complete and, at present, the meter is not designed for levels lower than about 65 phons. While, however, a ‘universal’ objective meter is not yet speci- fiable, there can be little doubt that the future of sound or noise measurement, from a practical point of view, lies with the objective meter. Even in its present state of development, its practical convenience often outweighs its limitations. It is free from personal bias, rapid in action A.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 39 and direct reading, and can be put into the hands of an untrained observer. Furthermore, as a dial instrument, it is well adapted to the enforcement of regulations or specifications. Tue ANALYsIS OF NOISE. The wave-form of the microphonic current of a sound can be readily displayed by means of a cathode-ray oscillograph, but the analysis of such wave-forms is usually troublesome, and the composition of a sound or noise is determined more conveniently by other means. The methods of spectrum analysis in optics are not convenient in the case of sound, by reason of the much longer wave lengths of sound and their wider range, the visible spectrum covering a range of only about one octave, whereas the range of sound to which the ear responds extends over about ten octaves. A diffraction grating of the order of size of a garden fence would in fact be required to deal directly with a normal acoustic spectrum. For the analysis of sound, the earlier experimenters used acoustical resonators which were tuned to respond to the different components present in the complex sound. In present-day methods, the oscillatory pressure variations which constitute the sound are first converted, by means of a microphone, into corresponding electrical oscillations ; and the problem is reduced to the analysis of a complex electrical oscillation, a process which may be effected by tuning or filtering circuits or by the use of a search or heterodyne tone. Such filters may be either of the high-pass or low-pass type, or alternatively may be arranged to pass bands of frequencies extending over, say, an octave or a fraction of an octave. This latter method is particularly valuable in the case of noises which are not of a steady nature or composition, for example, traffic noise. Steady sounds or noises readily lend themselves to analysis and yield typical line spectra, but the matter is less simple with transients, that is, acoustical impulses which start suddenly and die away rapidly. Examples of transients are speech (and in particular certain consonants like p and b), whip cracks, rifle shots, blows, footsteps, hand-clapping, percussion instruments, e.g. the piano, drum, and most musical instruments. All such sounds prove to be largely of the band-spectrum type with super- posed line spectra and nearly all contain very high frequencies. Sound analysis may be of particular service in studying machine noises as a means of tracking the source of major components. Synthesis of sounds is sometimes resorted to for particular purposes. Much progress has been made of late in the commercial development of instruments for acoustic analysis and synthesis. Here is an analyser which will almost instantaneously reveal the composition of a noise, while here also is a synthesiser, kindly lent me by Messrs. Comptons the famous organ builders, in which pure harmonics of controllable intensity can be so blended as to simulate, for example, church bells with a fidelity which is very arresting. NOISE-LEVEL MEASUREMENTS. In connection with problems of noise abatement, the National Physical Laboratory has made measurements and analyses of many noises of very 40 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES varied origin. The positions which some of these noises occupy in a scale of phons are shown in Fig. 1, the upper half of which includes various noises whose abatement would be acceptable in many circum- stances. This is illustrated by the homely test which most of us apply as a test of background of noise, i.e. the ease with which conversation is Approximate loudness levels of common noises. BS. Loudness scale of Phons. Phons Near threshold of pain Proscumity of aeroplane engine Prosimity of rivetin or loud pneumatic drill In printing press room Proximity of loud motor horn In busy machine shop, pump house ete. (eet Ne i | ee | In tube train; window open Nosy lorry (30 m.p.h.) at 20 tt In busy typing room In express train; window open Quret car (50 m.p.h.)at 20tt In busy main street = Loud conversation Quiet conversation In guiet saloon car (30m.p.h.) Qucet electric motor at 3ft In suburban train; window open Tearing of paper at 5ft. In quiet residential street Ticking of watch at 5ft In very quiet room In extremely guiel room zero 0 0002 dyne Near threshold of hearing 1000, cycles per sec; per sg.cm. Fic. 1. possible. At 60 phons, conversation is ‘comfortable’; at 90 phons, difficult ; and at 110 phons, virtually impossible. Among the noise problems on which the Laboratory has been con- sulted in recent years, are the mitigation of the noises associated with aeroplane-cabins and engine-testing factories, trains, ships, tube-railways, buses, motor horns, pneumatic drills, printing works, transformer sub- stations, cathedrals, assembly halls, business offices, flats, miniature rifle ranges, building operations, and so on. Assistance is also being given in connection with the Home Office experiments on air-raid warnings. A.—_MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 41 The loudness of a noise depends of course on its remoteness and to a less degree on its environment. The inverse-square law appears to be followed fairly exactly in the open for average sounds such as those of motor vehicles. Ina room or a tunnel, the law does not hold and a noise sounds louder than it would outside, owing to the building up of the sound level by multiple reflection. Similar conditions prevail in a narrow busy street and contribute to the noise discomfort of the occupants in the upper stories, though to a pedestrian, the noise of, say, a passing car is but little louder than in an open space. Incidentally, drivers of cars are familiar with the sudden access of high-pitched components from the _engines, exhausts or tyres of their cars as they pass reflecting walls or fencing or even minor way-side objects such as tree trunks or telegraph poles. One has also to remember that the path of a sound may appreciably modify its composition. For example, the high-frequency components may be abnormally reflected or absorbed as compared with lower notes which tend to pass through or round obstacles. Even in the open, a hedge row or a barrage of trees may, to a limited extent, so serve as a muffler of traffic noise. The high-pitched components of a sound may further be selectively enfeebled in passing over different types of ground, for which the sound absorption may be three or four times as much for high notes as for low. To judge by experience, the absorption figures for newly fallen snow must be rather high, though I am not aware that they have been measured. High-frequency components may also be selectively absorbed by the air itself if it is humid. Knudsen has shown that the effect is due to interaction between the oxygen and water molecules, the nitrogen playing no part. Incidentally, he estimates that if we lived in an atmosphere of oxygen at a humidity of about 20 per cent., the high notes of the violin and piccolo would be completely inaudible 50 yards away. NoIsE ON THE RAILWAY. The background of noise (7o-go phons) which prevails in the com- partments of most express trains is normally so near the borderline that, even with the windows closed, conversation between ‘ diagonal-wise ’ passengers, though possible, is not ‘ comfortable.’ The noise patently originates from the rapid intermittent pounding of the steel tyres against irregularities in the steel rail, largely supplemented by recurrent rail- joint impacts. Much of the noise is of low pitch, and, as simple observa- tion shows, it enters the coach partly through the floor, but mainly through the glass of the windows. The remainder of the noise, which is of some- what higher pitch and more directional, forces its attention on us whenever the train passes a reflecting surface such as a platform, wall, or another train, on which occurrence, the normal background of noise in a com- partment is supplemented by a burst of higher-pitched noise deflected through the windows. The conditions are aggravated (by as much as 10 phons) when a train is passing at high speed under a bridge or through a cutting or tunnel, so that conversation then becomes difficult. An obvious palliative for rail-joint tap takes the form of longer rails : c2 42 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES 120 feet lengths are now being employed on the L.N.E.R., while it is stated that lengths as long as 2,700 feet have been welded together on German main lines. Rail monocars with pneumatic tyres, now used for certain local services in chis country, extinguish rail noises to such a degree as to be almost uncanny, particularly from outside. Express-train travel in this country may be experienced in its most comfortable form on such trains as the ‘ Silver Jubilee,’ with its generous use of absorbent in the coaches, permanently-closed double windows and air-conditioned ventilation, conversation being readily possible at all speeds. Whatever the acoustic difficulties may be in trains above ground, they are multipled many times in an underground railway system. The. London Passenger Transport Board have achieved considerable success in their experiments on the acute problem of noise which is presented by the tube railways. Rail-joint noise is lessened by the use of go feet instead of 42 feet rails, which are then welded together in position. Further improvement comes from the employment of a rail-grinding car, which removes dents and imperfections from the rails and leaves them smooth. In addition, the experiment is being tried of continuous shields, made of asbestos and other materials, which project from the sides of the tunnel almost to the footplates of the train, so trapping and absorbing the noise coming from underneath. It is stated that these several measures result in an 80 per cent. diminu- tion of the noise, which presumably corresponds to a reduction of about 7 phons. Incidental noises such as wheel, gear and motor noise are reduced by the use of asbestos pads. Asbestos brake-blocks advantage- ously replace cast iron, while thicker glass windows help to reduce rattle. Seats of absorbent rubber or similar material, instead of cane, assist in lowering the noise level particularly in relatively empty coaches. A persistent type of noise in tube railways is the grating of wheel flanges in passing round sharp curves. NoIsE IN THE AIR. The degree of silencing which has been achieved in aircraft serves as an outstanding illustration of what can be done in the case of a gross noise problem under conditions so discouraging that only a few years ago it was commonly regarded as unlikely to find a satisfactory solution. It was important that ways and means should be found, for the noise of the engine had become the most serious deterrent to areoplane travel, conversation in the cabin being quite impossible. Since 1929 an extensive programme has been undertaken by the National Physical Laboratory for the Aeronautical Research Committee of the Air Ministry. There are three main sources of aeroplane noise : propeller noise, exhaust noise and engine clatter. The attack on the problem came in a variety of ways, for example, by using propellers with lower tip speeds, by better positioning of the engine exhausts, by more effective exhaust silencing, by enclosing the engines so as to reduce engine clatter, by increasing the relative isolation of the engine and cabin, by a better placing or shielding of the cabin with reference to the propellers, A—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 43 by constructing cabins of double walls containing a suitable filler, by the damping of ‘ drumming’ panels, etc., and by increasing the amount of absorbent in the cabin. Measurements have been made in aeroplanes in flight and on the main individual sources of noise under experimental conditions. The present position is that the noise in the passenger cabins of some of the latest air liners or flying boats is little more than that in a train. This is very well for the passengers ; from the point of view, however, of those who live near aerodromes or on busy air routes the noise of air- craft is still a nuisance which awaits a solution. NOISE ON THE Roap. (i) Ministry of Transport tests—The growing volume of road traffic, and the ever-increasing speed and acceleration of individual vehicles, are potent contributory factors to the problem of road transport noise. There have, it is true, been certain counterbalancing changes, to wit, the steady gain in quietness of the newer models of the motor bus and motor coach, and the introduction of the trolley bus in place of the much noisier tram car. But these are only drops in the bucket. Backed by the force of public opinion the then Minister of Transport, Mr. Hore Belisha, who proved himself a great ally of quietness on the road, set up in 1934 a Departmental Committee for the purpose of studying the question of motor-vehicle noises. The Committee included representatives of the motor and motor-cycle industries ; and as Chairman of the Committee, I hope I may be permitted to refer to some of its proceedings and recommendations which are contained in the three interim reports ? so far published. These reports, which may be consulted for fuller informa- tion, are based on an elaborate series of tests, comprising many thousands of observations, which were carried out on behalf of the Committee by National Physical Laboratory. (ii) Tests on new motor vehicles—The first two reports deal with tests on a representative selection of nearly 100 mechanically-propelled vehicles, comprising saloon motor cars, sports cars, motor cycles, goods- and passenger-carrying vehicles, most of which were kindly lent by the industry. It was decided to begin the work by a survey of newly manu- factured vehicles, both of home and foreign origin, which were intended to operate on the roads in this country. After careful consideration, the Committee decided to confine their first attention to the ‘ overall ’ noise of vehicles, as representing the aspect of major public interest, and one which might be expected to afford, without undue delay, information which would serve as a trustworthy basis for possible legislative action. No systematic attempt was made to study the composition of the noise, the major components of which in- clude those from the engine, transmission and exhaust, although a partial separation of the ‘fore’ and ‘aft’ components was possible without difficulty. It was rather felt that further steps could best be left to 1 “ Noise in the operation of mechanically propelled vehicles.”” O.H.M.S. 1935, 1936 and 1937. 44 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES the initiative and efforts of the industry itself which, as a whole, merits high praise for its substantial contributions to the silence of motor vehicles, for example the flexible mounting of engines, the counter- balanced crank shaft, silent gearing, the straight-through type of exhaust silencer, and the development of car bodies which are sound insulated and sound absorbent. In the matter of both exhaust and general silencing, certain motor car manufacturers have achieved remarkable perfection. It is a notable comment on the success of the general quietening of cars that tyre noise (about 75 phons) has become conspicuous at moderate speeds, especially on particular road surfaces on wet days. Even in the matter of certain motor cycles and sports cars, it must be conceded that their acoustic blemishes have been largely stimulated by a section of the public which happily now finds itself in a small and dwindling minority. The Ministry of Transport tests were carried out under conditions of both use and abuse, with the object of arriving at a measure of the noise potentialities of a vehicle in the hands of a driver who is prepared, on occasion, to misuse it and so give rise to an objectionably large output of noise, for example, by racing a stationary engine at high speed, or travelling at high acceleration in a low gear. The Committee, while appreciating that the effect of noise on the human being is partly psychological, satisfied itself that the problem before it was one mainly of loudness, and that the N.P.L. objective noise meter, which was used throughout the tests, provided a trustworthy index of the average noise levels experienced by the observers present. Measurements were first conducted on stationary vehicles with racing engines. ‘These were followed by tests on running vehicles in various gears at a variety of steady speeds and also when accelerating under full throttle, both on the level and when climbing hills. Each vehicle was driven either by the firm’s driver or the owner during the tests, and the goods- and passenger-carrying vehicles were tested fully laden. Some of the tests were carried out on Brooklands Track, others in various parts of Middlesex and Surrey under a wide diversity of favourable and un- favourable weather conditions. In general, the measurements showed that, omnibus paribus, a vehicle emits most noise at its highest speed, so that the gain in quietness from the imposition of the 30 m.p.h. speed restriction in built-up areas would seem to be worth while. In the case of the tests on cars and motor cycles when running on the level in top gear, the average noise emission at steady road speed was found to increase by about 4 phons for each 10 m.p.h. increment of speed, while at full throttle the corresponding figure was of the order of 2 or 3 phons. In the case of cars or motor cycles, the noise at 30 m.p.h. steady speed was on the average about 5 phons less than when accelerated at full throttle at that speed. It was also established that when a vehicle was travelling at full throttle at a specified speed in a given gear the noise was substantially the same whether the vehicle was accelerating on the level through the instantaneous speed in question, or climbing a hill at the same steady speed. A few tests were conducted with cars and lorries free-wheeling, i.e. with the engine stopped and the gear in neutral. The loudnesses measured, A—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 45 which naturally set a limit to the quietness attainable, ranged between 70 and 80 phons at 30 m.p.h. The noise levels recorded during the various running and racing engine tests extended over a wide range—in round figures, 40 phons, i.e. from 75 to 115 B.S. phons, at a distance ‘of 18 feet sideways or 25 feet to the front or the rear. A consensus of opinion among the observers present at the tests suggested that a transition point between tolerably noisy vehicles and unduly noisy ones was in the region of go B.S. phons. In general, the following conclusions emerged from the tests on new vehicles :— (a) Confirming the common impression, the average present-day ‘ ordinary ’ motor car is not offensively noisy, except at high engine speeds. (6) Certain ‘ sports ’ cars (though not all) are too noisy but can clearly be improved without much difficulty. (c) Except at moderate steady speeds, many motor cycles make far too much noise. (d) Certain commercial vehicles are somewhat noisy but could probably be substantially improved without a great deal of trouble. The Committee were therefore led to make the following recommenda- tions for new vehicles which, while designed to ameliorate traffic noise in all localities, take particular cognisance of ‘ built-up ’ areas, in which regions the effects of excessive noise are undoubtedly the most disturbing :— (z) ‘ No new motor cycle, motor car, heavy motor car or motor tractor, as defined in Section 2 of the Road Traffic Act, 1930, shall be offered for sale or for use on the public highway unless it complies with the requirements stated below, the specified tests of which must be con- ducted in an open space free from the proximity of buildings, etc. (a) ‘ Normal running test —When the vehicle is running at a road (6) speed of 30 m.p.h. (or at such lower maximum speed as is attainable by the vehicle or is legally prescribed for it) with the engine at full throttle and using the gear preferred by the driver, then the loudness at a point distant laterally 18 feet from the midpoint of the vehicle shall not exceed go phons (B.S.). Measurements shall be made on each side of the vehicle and the mean taken. The running conditions specified may be realised either on the level or on an incline, using appropriate accelera- tion, braking, loading, etc. ‘ Racing engine test—When the vehicle is stationary and the engine is running at the speed at which it would give its maximum power, the loudness at a point distant 25 feet behind the open end of the exhaust pipe shall not exceed go phons (B.S.). _ (2) ‘A latitude of 5 phons on the above noise limits shall be allowed for a period of two years on the following classes of vehicles :— 46 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES ‘In respect of the “ normal running test’: motor cycles, heavy motor cars and motor tractors. ‘ In respect of the “‘ racing engine test”: motor cycles. ‘ After two years the normal limits shall prevail. (3) ‘ As it is obvious that finality has not been reached in the art of quietening mechanically propelled vehicles, the Minister should reserve the right to amend in the future the above noise limits in the light of further developments. (4) ‘ The Minister should by regulation make it an offence to cause or permit the engine of a stationary vehicle to be run at excessive speeds.’ With regard to cars, both ef the ordinary and sports types, there can be little doubt that conformity with the suggested limits is either already attained or readily can be. The difficulties are doubtless greater in the case of motor cycles and commercial vehicles, where it may be that an acceptable degree of quietness is only attainable by a sacrifice of power and an increased cost. It was felt, however, that given time the problem was not insoluble, and a tolerance period of two years was accordingly suggested to meet the situation. Polar diagrams which were obtained by exploring the sound distribu- tion round a vehicle, indicate that ordinary cars and commercial vehicles owe their loudest noise to their engines, while in the case of motor cycles and certain sports cars, the loudest noise is in the direction of the exhaust pipe. Extreme examples of the latter occur, and it was to meet these that the racing engine test was introduced, as such cases may not reveal themselves in the lateral noise measurements associated with the normal running test. As regards the racing engine test, the engine speeds proposed are those at which the maximum power is developed, and though the speeds are high, they are not abnormally so. Still higher engine speeds may produce a considerable increase in loudness—as much as 10 phons—and the Committee felt that such misuse of a vehicle, for example in a quiet street, would be best met by a regulation on the lines of recommendation No. 4. (iii) Tests on ‘ used’ motor vehicles—Having thus dealt with vehicles fresh from the manufacturers, the Committee passed on to ‘ used’ or ‘ old’ vehicles, and in their third report published a few months ago they deal with this matter. Experience suggests that the noise from used vehicles will normally be higher than from newly manufactured ones, whether by reason of development in design, or as the result of normal wear and tear, or unsatisfactory maintenance. The ultimate object of the investigation on used vehicles was to study the feasibility of a common noise limit for all classes of vehicles on the roads to-day, irrespective of their age or circumstances of use. Accordingly a series of tests, on the lines of those in the earlier reports, were undertaken on some 40 representative vehicles, including motor cycles, motor cars and commercial vehicles, of various ages up to 13 years. These tests were supplemented by random observations on some 600 A—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 47 vehicles in normal traffic on a variety of roads, some speed-restricted and others unrestricted. The results were in general harmony with the previous conclusions, and it appeared that a difference of about 5 phons between new and old vehicles is an all-round representative figure which takes cognisance of the many factors involved such as type, design, power, age and state of repair. The evidence was, however, not sufficiently definite to indicate that the noise was dependent on the age of the vehicles to any outstanding degree. The measurements on normal traffic on the road were spread over a range of approximately 70 to 105 phons, and from a study of the results, it appeared that a general limit of 95 phons (B.S.) for the various classes of vehicles was a reasonable figure, which would rule out the chief offenders and would not be incompatible with the limit of go phons proposed for the tests on newly-manufactured vehicles. If such a limit were brought into force, the Committee was of opinion that the case of vehicles already licensed on the roads could be met by a tolerance period of two years. The tests indicated that greater progress had been made in the silencing of sports cars than of motor cycles, many of which constitute at high speeds the noisiest traffic on the road to-day. The Committee took the view that the temporary figure of 95 phons suggested for the tolerance period in the case of new motor cycles, should also suffice for motor cycles on the road which are run at reasonable speeds. The Committee therefore submitted to the Minister of Transport the following recommendations dealing with used vehicles :— (1) ‘ When a vehicle is used on the public highway the loudness of the noise emitted when measured at a point distant laterally 18 feet from the mid-point of the vehicle, or 25 feet behind the open end of the exhaust pipe shall not exceed 95 phons (B.S.). (2) ‘ A vehicle shall be regarded as complying with the above require- ment if it can pass the following tests : ’— [Here follow the specifications for the ‘normal running test ‘ and the ‘ racing engine test’ as for new vehicles (pp. 59 and 60), with the exception that ‘95 phons’ replaces ‘ go phons ’.| (3) ‘The noise limit of 95 phons (B.S.) for vehicles on the public highway shall operate in the first case only in respect of vehicles registered on or after the prescribed date, but shall come into general application for vehicles of any age after two years have elapsed from that date. (4) ‘The Minister should reserve the right to amend in the future the above noise limit in the light of further developments.’ (iv) Summary of Ministry of Transport’s reports.—To summarise the three reports of the Ministry of Transport Committee, the position is that for the first time in this country a comprehensive attack has been made on the problem of road traffic noise. To this end, loudness measurements, many thousands in number, have been conducted under widely differ- ent working conditions, on the over-all noise of some 800 motor vehicles, 48 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES both new and old, representing all the main types on the roads to-day. The results (at a distance of 18 feet sideways or 25 feet to the rear) mostly ranged between about 70 and 105 phons (the latter value corresponding to a noisy road drill). The Committee were led to propose simple running and racing engine tests which are associated, under specified conditions, with an ‘ over-all’ noise limit of 95 phons, which is roughly equivalent to the noise in a tube train) for all vehicles in use on the road, and of go phons for new vehicles leaving manufacturer’s works. The adoption of these noise limits, while making very moderate demands on most types of vehicles would, by ruling out the arch offenders, constitute a substantial contribution to the amenities of the road. In the meantime, the industry, which has already discovered that ‘ silence is saleable,’ has the matter well in hand and indeed it is not unlikely that future developments will not only enable manufacturers to meet the proposed requirements with comparative ease, but may indeed enable the limits to be lowered as time goes on. Certain types of vehicles, such as most ordinary cars, are already agreeably quiet, but others, notably motor cycles, have lee-way to catch up ; and the Committee has accordingly suggested breathing space in the shape of periods of grace to meet these and other aspects of the problem of noise as it is on the road to-day. ‘The Committee’s task has not been easy, but I trust the limits of noise which it has proposed will, in one way or another, help to ensure a standard of acoustical decency on the roads of this country. Following the publication of the Committee’s reports, the Minister of Transport received assurance from the manufacturers of motor cycles and sports cars that they will not in future put on the market any new vehicle the noise of which could be regarded as offensive. To assist the motor industry in this laudable object, the Ministry recently set up four noise- testing stations in different parts of the country. At each of these stations an N.P.L. noise meter is installed, and manufacturers are enabled to submit types of their products and so ascertain for themselves how the noise levels compare with the limits proposed. The whole question will be further facilitated when the simplified objective noise meter, which has recently been developed by the National Physical Laboratory for the Ministry is put on the market. Such meters, which will be checked against the Laboratory standard meter, should, when available in quantity, be of great assistance at such time as it may be decided to bring into force regulations for dealing with noise on the road. As regards the outstanding problem of the abatement of motor-cycle noise, I may mention that the British Cycle & Motor Cycle Manufacturers & Traders Union Ltd., together with the Institution of Automobile Engineers, have recently instituted a programme of research which is to be carried out largely at the National Physical Laboratory. (v) Motor horns.—Motor horns, if unduly loud or improperly used, have come to be regarded as a very unnecessary nuisance on the road. In this connection it is generally appreciated that the Ministry of Trans- port’s beneficent suppression of horn hooting at night has not only led to no increase in accidents but has taught many people to drive more A—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 49 quietly in the day time also. Most of us have come to agree that a strident horn rarely, if ever, makes for safety but more frequently leads to in- decision or fear on the part of other road users. ‘The National Physical Laboratory has carried out measurements on motor horns for the Depart- mental Committee of the Ministry of Transport, with the object of deter- mining the scope and effectiveness of such warning devices and, if possible, of correlating annoyance with some measurable physical factor. The report of the Committee is not yet available. Incidentally it is common experience that a reasonable driver seldom finds it necessary to employ a horn at all, a doctrine to which it is evident that Paris and some other Continental cities do not subscribe. (vi) Pneumatic road drills—Before leaving the subject of road noises I ought to refer to that sporadic producer of undue noise—the pneu- matic road drill. Much attention has been given to the question of its silencing: possibly the problem of impact silencing will remain until rotary drills come into use. That there are grounds, however, for believing that some progress is being effected in regard to exhaust silencing would appear from some comparative tests carried out last year under the auspices of the Westminster City Council. Equivalent loudness measure- ments made by the National Physical Laboratory gave an average figure of 102 phons (B.S.) for the unsilenced drills, while the corresponding figures for the silenced drills ranged from g1 to 101 phons, the lower values thus bringing the noise nearer to that of general traffic noises in a busy street, say 80 phons. Unfortunately it appeared that, roughly- speaking, the drills making the least noise took the longest time to break a given amount of concrete, though the relative skill and experience of the different operators and labourers in the competing teams must not be lost sight of in comparing the efficiencies of the different drills. Tue ABATEMENT OF NOISE. While in some European countries there are now severe legal pro- hibitions against noise, the position in this country is rather that of legally identifying a noise with a nuisance. Under the provisions of the Public Health Act of 1936, it is the duty of a local authority, if satisfied of the existence of a nuisance, to serve a notice requiring its abatement, and, in default, to take proceedings in court for abatement or prohibition of the nuisance. There are, moreover, numerous precedents in local Acts already in force, according to which a noise nuisance exists if any person makes or causes to be made any excessive or unreasonable or unnecessary noise which is injurious or dangerous to health. Such noise nuisances often arise from plant and machinery which are operated during the night or early morning, but there are other circumstances which appear to demand a working definition of a noise nuisance. It should be added that if a noise occurs in the course of any trade, business or occupation, it is a good defence that the best practicable means of preventing or mitigating it, having regard to the cost, have been adopted. As regards the noise of motor vehicles, much information concerning legislation will be found in the First Report of the Ministry of Transport Departmental Committee on Noise. 50 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES In the meantime the law is doing its best. A London magistrate was recently courageous enough to describe that which is emitted from a Scotsman’s bagpipes as noise. A stipendiary ruled not long ago that a violin and piano-accordion are ‘ noisy instruments,’ and so is the human voice, but only if used in a concerted piece with other instruments. A firm of Galton-whistle manufacturers advertises ‘ silent dog-whistles ’ and so avoids any possibility of legal interference. There are two guiding principles when the question of noise abatement is being considered. ‘The one is that the degree of abatement of a noise in a particular locality need be no more than will conform to the back- ground of noise which obtains in that locality. The other is that in a medley of noises, the loudest must be tackled first to achieve any appreciable benefit, after that the next loudest, and so on. This is illus- trated by the fact that if there are two similar components and one is 10 decibels less intense than the other, the weaker one will contribute only half a phon to the over-all loudness. I am reminded that to illustrate the somewhat meagre additive effect of two equally intense sources, I was guilty a few years ago of perpetrating an analogy based on crying twins. I now realise that the subsequent march of events demands a more extended treatment, and so, for the benefit of those who may be interested, I should add that ‘ quins’ chattering simultaneously are 7 phons louder than one by herself, and that the corresponding figure for ‘ quads’ is 6 phons, triplets 5 phons, and twins 3 phons. The first line of attack on noise abatement, and in general much the most effective and economical, is to tackle an objectionable noise at the source, and find the best means of reducing the output as much as possible. The next step, possibly as a confession of failure, is to find a feasible method of confining or ‘ smothering’ the noise in the place where it is generated. In either case we turn to the engineer for help, and we may anticipate that he is likely to be the more interested if he can see a potential demand from the public. Fortunately the public is becoming sufficiently noise-conscious to query the need for noises which it stigmatises as a nuisance, so that there is now a goodly list of ‘ silent’ appliances in every- day life, though as regards many commercial machines and processes, it is realised that the millennium is not yet and we must put up with second- best expedients for the present. The path of a noise in its journey from source to hearer, may be either via the intervening air, or vza a sequence of solid materials or structures. Experience has shown that the two effects require very different remedies for abatement. The study of the general problem of noise transmission is more complex than might be imagined, and some of the major diffi- culties are not as yet completely resolved. For the practical elucidation of the various factors involved, specially designed -‘ sound-proof’ laboratories, such as those at the National Physical Laboratory, have proved to be necessary. Parenthetically, it may be mentioned that the N.P.L. acoustics laboratory, since its erection four years ago, has been so fully engaged in transmission and absorption work, mainly for the architectural profession and the building industry, that extensions are A.—_MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 51 now in hand and should be available for use by the end of the year. Much research work on building acoustics is also being carried out for the Ministry of Health in connection with slum clearance, and for the Architectural Acoustics Committee of the National Physical Laboratory and the Building Research Station. To revert to the case of a non-suppressible noise, if most of the noise is transmitted by air, the best remedy, should circumstances render it practicable, is some sort of sound-proof enclosure, the design of which may need careful attention both as regards weight and discontinuity of structure. There is, of course, no such thing as a sound-proof material, and success in sound insulation is largely a matter of design. Certain large-scale operations may require ‘ sound-proof’ buildings to mask them, the doors and windows of which should be heavy and close- fitting and preferably situated on the side remote from that where the noise is liable to be regarded as a nuisance. Doors and windows, particularly high windows and skylights, may require to be doubled and, in extreme cases, it may be necessary to employ double walls mounted on independent foundations. Buildings in which noisy operations are carried on should, if possible, be put under the lee of larger buildings, which may afford advantageous shielding to the locality. In the interior of noisy buildings, it is usually beneficial to the workers to divide groups of noisy machinery, as far as may be possible, into smaller units, each in its own enclosure. Appreciable benefit may also result from lining walls and ceilings with acoustical absorbent, so pre- venting the noise level from building up unduly. In the case of structure-borne noises, the remedy is discontinuity somewhere in the structure either in the form of an air gap or as resilient material, for example, under the foundations of noisy or vibrating machinery. As an illustration of the abatement of extreme noise, near a residential area, reference may be made to the new Alvis works at Coventry, in the design of which the National Physical Laboratory co-operated. These works are devoted to the excessively noisy operation of testing aero engines on the bench. The entire building, which has double walls, and through which a high wind passes, is fitted, so to speak, with an exhaust pipe and silencer, which takes the form of a horizontal brick tunnel 100 feet long, 12 feet high and 10 feet wide, lined with 4 inches of mineral wool and asbestos cloth. This not only serves as an outlet for the wind but reduces the objectionably high noise of the engines to an acceptable figure as heard in the neighbourhood. Quret HovusInc. Those of us who seek isolation in an endeavour to protect themselves from noise, should first of all choose a naturally quiet site for the building they propose to occupy, and then select a room as remote as possible from such noises as there may be, whether from traffic or other sources. That the sound shadows cast by buildings are sufficiently pronounced to be beneficial finds ample illustration in the quiet gardens of busy cities often 52 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES only a stone’s throw from heavy traffic routes. Such screening by inter- vening buildings is often much more pronounced than the fading with distance, which latter, on the inverse-square law, is at the rate of 6 phons for a doubling of the distance. Not all of us are free, however, to pick and choose our locations and, in some cases, the noise from both within and without a building is such that only by the most careful planning can quiet conditions be secured for a reasonable outlay or indeed at all. For the rest, the remedies depend on the circumstances, but are much the same as those for the noisy source viz. double windows and doors and possibly walls; double floors, the upper one resting on resilient supports; as much discontinuity of structure as is practicable, and acoustic absorbents on the walls and ceilings. ‘The success of remedial measures in a building already erected is likely to be limited. It has to be recognised that modern building design and materials do not provide protection from noises, whether from inside or outside, like the more solid houses of a generation ago. Many people can no longer escape from the noise of their neighbour’s wireless, gramophone, vacuum cleaner, bathroom or even his conversation. It is a common complaint that noises such as banging or tapping can be heard throughout the length and breadth of large buildings constructed on modern lines. The noise problem is accentuated in the case of the large blocks of flats which are being erected in all quarters, and which apparently are mainly adapted for quiet tenants who are prepared to conform in this respect to a landlord’s reasonable requirements. But there are those who contend that in communal housing, the acoustic conditions should be such that noise is automatically confined within the room in which it is made, so that a slogan of ‘ more cry, little noise’ should represent the situation. ‘They desire to order their own home life, even if it takes the form of leaving the wireless on all day and most of the night, the gramo- phone being there to fill up any gaps. ‘They are opposed to curbing the natural inclination of their children to play vociferously, bang doors and run about. On the other hand, they feel that they ought not to be put in the position of involuntarily annoying their neighbours, even if they should be invalids, or night workers trying to sleep by day, or who have children trying to do homework or who go to bed early. The situation lies largely with local authorities, who should lay down building bye-laws, setting forth minimum standards of acoustic insula- tion. ‘The architect and builder have of necessity been driven from traditional methods of construction to meet the economic requirements and closer scientific designing of to-day. Discontinuity of structure and the use of massive and poorly conducting materials formerly provided defence against sound, but instead we now have monolithic structures which are not only thinner and lighter than the old, but are composed of good conducting materials. The steel-framed and ferro-concrete build- ing, cement mortar, hard bricks and plaster, to say nothing of a general ramification of central-heating, running water and other piping, have replaced the softer brickwork, lime mortar and plaster, wooden beams, joists and studding, and the localised piping of the older houses. No A.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 53 one pretends, of course, that we can go back to the old methods, but if we are to mitigate the noise nuisance in modern buildings, we must adopt measures which are best incorporated during the designing stage. There is, too, another aspect which should be clearly appreciated and that is if sound insulation in buildings is desired, it has to be paid for. The public, at present enticed with a plethora of labour-saving devices by landlords of flats, has yet to learn that reasonable acoustic privacy is obtainable provided it is prepared to face a small proportionate increase in the rent. (i) The insulation of walls and windows.—In the case of walls, par- 70 ye ie 38 60 +. a Ss S Qs N y Q ee = c is Rr fe) 50 3 3 £ N iz Q x fo) > 5 = ~ > 40 x RS _ 3 s ) gy ~ 30 x Sound reduction ( decibels ) fo) OT Oz Os 70. 2-0 50 70 20 50 100 Weight of partition (lbs. per square foot ) Dependence of the sound reduction of single homogeneous partitions upon their weight. (Sound reduction averaged for treguenctes 200,300,500,700, 1000, /600 « 2000 eycles per second ) Fic. 2. titions and windows, we have to provide defence primarily against air-borne rather than structure-borne sounds. It is established that the insulating value for air-borne sounds can be expressed in terms of the extent to which an incident sound is reduced in intensity. A single solid (or hollow-block) wall tends to behave like a piston which is lightly held round the edges, so that the mean insulating value is governed by weight alone, being roughly proportional to the logarithm of the super- ficial weight, no matter what the material (see Fig. 2). High notes are easier to stop than low, that is apart from vagaries caused by resonance effects which occur at certain frequencies: these have been recently explored by Constable. A window is usually the most vulnerable part of a wall from the point of view of acoustical insulation. The weight 54 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES relation is, of course, impaired by the presence of cracks or badly fitting joints ; a surprisingly large amount of sound can be so transmitted. Measurements show that to increase appreciably the insulating value of a single wall, involves a prohibitive addition to the weight; for example, doubling the weight only adds rather less than 5 decibels to the insulation. The minimum standard of acceptable insulation for a party wall against air-borne sounds is commonly adopted as being that of a plastered g-inch brick wall (about 55 db). ‘The main escape from the weight relation lies in the use of double or composite partitions free from rigid couplings. Double air-spaced partitions may be divided conveniently into two classes :— (a) Those using light flexible materials in which the mechanical linkage via the edges is small; and (6) Those using heavy rigid components, in which case linkage via the edges is likely to be substantial. The first class has been shown by Constable to exhibit resonance effects due to coupling by the air in the interspace, so that the insulating value depends on the spacing and incidentally displays a minimum. The insulation is improved by introducing sound absorbent material in the interspace in such a manner that it does not act as a link between the components. As a practical illustration of these observations, it is recommended for good insulation that double windows should have a sound-absorbent lining at the boundary of the interspace, and that the spacing should exceed a certain minimum, e.g. 4 inches for 21 oz. glass, a properly constructed double window being as sound proof as a g-inch brick wall. For thicker glass the separation can be reduced. Double windows conforming to these requirements are now commercially avail- able, some of which permit the windows to be opened and still afford an acceptable degree of insulation. In the case of double partitions constructed from heavy rigid materials, coupling via the edges dominates that due to the air, so that the insulating value can be increased appreciably by framing the components with insulation, e.g. cork strip, round their margins. For example, a cavity partition consisting of two 2-inch clinker slabs separated by a 2-inch air gap and marginally insulated by cork is acoustically as effective as a solid g-inch brick wall and costs appreciably less, though if the insulation is omitted, the partition is little better than a single wall of the same total weight. Recent tests show that the insulating value of a single solid wall benefits by the application to both sides of plastered building-board fixed to battens secured by insulating clips. It is of considerable interest to note that the traditional partition of lath and plaster on each side of wooden studding (or a similar partition with fibre board) is definitely superior to a single partition of the same weight. A fire-resisting version consisting of plastered expanded metal on concrete studding affords insulation equal to that of a plastered g-inch brick wall (of three times the weight). It should be noted that the insulating value of a wall (or floor) against air-borne sounds originating in a room is often set a limit by the fact A.—MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES 55 that the sound also falls upon flanking walls (or floors) and is so conducted to other rooms. The effect, which may be appreciated by putting the ear against the flanking surfaces, is likely to be of only minor importance unless the walls or floors have insulating values appreciably greater than that of a g-inch brick wall. (ii) The insulation of floors—The problem is more difficult in the case of floors, for which the important aspect of acoustical insulation is that of reducing the transmission of impact sounds such as footsteps. To measure the insulation of a test floor, it is subjected to blows from a set of mechanically driven hammers designed to simulate heavy footsteps. The noise heard below the floor is measured subjectively by a team of observers. Since no satisfactory method of determining absolute values for insulation against impact sounds has yet been developed, the results are necessarily comparative and show the amount by which the insulation of the test floor exceeds that of some floor of ordinary construction which is accepted as a standard. It appears that for floors, as for walls, a composite structure is a necessary concomitant of good insulation. Three general methods of providing such a structure have been investigated, viz. :— (a) To lay on the floor a soft material such as carpet on underfelt, or linoleum with a sponge rubber or similar backing ; (6) To lay a ‘ floating floor,’ i.e. a supplementary floor supported on insulating material on the structural floor ; (c) To mount an insulated false ceiling below the floor, for example, on insulating hooks. The first method provides better insulation for sharp blows than for dull blows (such as heavy footsteps), but may be unacceptable on the ground of expense and, in the case of working class dwellings, on account of the unsuitability of the material. The second method is capable of providing good insulation together with a hard upper surface at not too great acost. So far, two classes of floating floor have been examined, viz. a concrete floor standing upon a number of suitably proportioned rubber blocks; and a wooden “‘ raft” floor resting upon a continuous layer of soft cushioning material such as eel-grass or glass-silk blanket. Both are examples of successful floor treatment, though the underlying factors are not as yet completely investigated. Experiments with the concrete and rubber-block construction have shown that such leakage of sound as occurs from the floating to the structural floor is partly through the rubber supports and partly through the air interspace. A suspended ceiling alone is not usually as effective as the floor treatments, but may be used in combination with them to obtain a greater insulation when necessary, the effects being additive. Neither does a suspended ceiling isolate an impact sound and so prevent transmission to other parts of a building as does a floating floor. The standard of acceptable insulation for a floor is commonly taken as at least 15 to 20 phons better than that of a bare solid or hollow-tile concrete floor for a test impact which simulates heavy footsteps. It 56 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES may be noted that the noise of such impacts heard below a concrete floor is practically as loud as that heard above. (iii) Sound - absorbent treatment of rooms.—As already mentioned, it is often expedient to subject the surfaces of noisy rooms to treatment with sound-absorbent. This serves a double purpose. It is firstly a necessary adjunct of a sound-insulating wall if it is to operate to advantage, and secondly it serves to reduce the amount of noise built up by repeated reflections at the room surfaces. ‘The extent of the quietening value is, however, limited, as that part of the sound heard directly is not ordinarily affected. There is a great variety of sound-absorbent materials on the market, ranging from stone and tiles with structural properties to soft flexible materials. Some of the latter are of a fluffy porous nature, so that covers of open texture, or perforated, or even pin-pricked are commonly pro- vided. Some acoustic absorbents have coefficients as high as go per cent. and most of them absorb high notes better than low. Meyer has recently developed a non-perforated cover, which may have hygienic advantages, e.g. for hospital purposes. This consists, for example, of thin metal sheets mounted on a wooden framework so that they are spaced an inch or two from a. wall to which is attached absorbent material. Finally, there are two or three other points which may require attention when plans are being made for sound-insulating a building. The first is machinery noise which is liable to be conducted through the structure of a building unless the machinery is properly insulated. For the pur- pose, it should be mounted upon an undamped elastic support so weighted and proportioned that the frequency of vibration of the machinery on this support is low compared‘with the frequency of the noise generated. The second point concerns noise conducted through metal pipes, for example, water pipes. While some of the noise originating in a tap or a circulating pump travels through the water, much of it is directly con- ducted by the piping itself. It has been found at the National Physical Laboratory that a beneficial reduction (10-15 db) in the noise transmitted along a water pipe can be achieved by replacing a few feet of the pipe with rubber hose. A third point is the noise of ventilating fans forming part of a system of artificial ventilation which is likely to be an essential accompaniment of a sound-insulated building. Care should be taken that the tip speed of ventilating fans does not greatly exceed 50 feet per second. Ventilating ducts should be lined with sound-absorbent, and a length of canvas hose may advantageously be inserted at some point in a duct. ’ The foregoing will, I hope, afford a notion of some of the organised steps which are being taken in this country to combat the evil of un- necessary noise. To find practicable solutions to the many ramifications of the problem is, I submit, of material significance to every section of the community. SECTION B.—CHEMISTRY. RESEARCHES IN CHEMOTHERAPY ADDRESS BY Dr. F. L. PYMAN, F.R.S., PRESIDENT OF THE SECTION. CHEMOTHERAPY may be regarded as the treatment of disease by chemical substances, which have been shown by biological methods to be relatively much more toxic to pathogenic organisms than to human or other animal hosts. Chemotherapy was developed by Paul Ehrlich, and its most out- standing achievement has been the introduction of the arsenic group of spirocheticides. Very early on, Ehrlich noticed that when certain dye- stuffs were injected into the living animal, they selected certain tissues which were intensely stained, whilst others were left practically free from colour, and as long ago as 1891, he observed that the malarial parasite was strongly stained by methylene blue and thus differentiated from the tissue of the host. It then occurred to him that it might be possible to discover dyestuffs or other drugs whose chemical affinity for disease organisms was so great that the organism might be killed without damage to the tissues of the host. Successful results were obtained in the laboratory with dyes such as methylene blue, Trypan-red, and Trypan-blue, but the practical value of these dyes has been slight. In the course of his studies Ehrlich soon found it necessary to find some means of expressing the chemotherapeutic activity of compounds for purposes of comparison. He therefore determined for each new substance the ratio of the minimum curative dose to the maximum tolerated dose, which he called the Chemotherapeutic Index. The ideal compound would obviously be the one which would destroy the parasitic agents of disease without in any way injuring the cells of the body. Such a compound has yet to be discovered, for every known substance which is toxic to parasites is also toxic to a greater or lesser extent to body tissues. For practical purposes the chemotherapeutic index should be as favourable as possible. Chemotherapeutic research postulates co-operation between clinicians, biologists and chemists. The first step is the discovery by the biologist in co-operation with the clinician that some parasite is responsible for a given disease. Then methods must be found by which the parasite can be isolated, cultivated and studied. Sometimes this can be done in the test-tube, as in the case of the researches on bactericides and ameebicides, 58 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES to which I shall refer in detail later. In other cases, the particular disease, or one closely related to it, may be induced and studied in animals. Schulemann (1932) has traced the stages in the development of a laboratory method for evaluating antimalarial drugs in the following words: ‘In 1880 Laveran discovered the malarial parasite, and in 1891 Grassi and Feletti found in birds a parasite similar to that of human malaria. In 1895, Ross, stimulated and directed by Manson, discovered the réle played by the mosquito in transmitting the disease. How bird malaria might be used for the study of malarial treatment in man was investigated by Kopanaris and the brothers Sergent, but it was not till 1924 that a satisfactory technique was evolved’ by Roehl, who ‘ worked out a method of using canaries for experiments on lines closely approach- ing the conditions of practical therapy, so that it was possible to try out and assess in the laboratory many groups of drugs.’ On the chemical side, researches in chemotherapy start from the discovery that some drug, whose constitution is wholly or partly known, is of clinical benefit in a given disease or is toxic to certain organisms. Once some knowledge of the chemical constitution of the drug has been obtained, substances more or less closely related to it can be synthesised and tested for their chemotherapeutic properties. Traditional knowledge of the value of ‘cinchona bark in malaria, followed by the isolation of quinine and the associated alkaloids, the recognition that the medicinal value of the bark was due to these, and the determination of their chemical constitutions, made possible the chemo- therapeutic researches which led to the discovery of plasmoquin and atebrin. BACTERICIDES. The introduction of phenol or carbolic acid for the prevention of sepsis by Lister in 1867 formed the starting-point in research on bactericides. A very large number of derivatives of phenol have since been made and tested for their bactericidal properties. The effect of substituting one or more alkyl groups in the benzene ring has been studied, and it has long been known that many alkyl-phenols exceed phenol itself in bactericidal value. One method of determining the phenol coefficient of bactericides is the Rideal Walker test, comparing their efficiency with that of phenol in destroying B. typhosus. By this test the cresols—methyl- phenols—have phenol coefficients of 2 to 2:5, whilst thymol—a methylzsopropylphenol—has a phenol coefficient of about 25. In recent years, systematic studies have been made of several homo- logous series of phenols. An early example of the investigation of a homologous series was made in another field by Morgenroth and his collaborators (1911-1917). They studied the homologous series of alkylhydrocupreines, and showed that peak activity was obtained at the ethyl member (optoquin) for pneumococci, and at isooctyl (vuzin) for B. diphtheria. In clinical use optoquin proved to be unsatisfactory for the treatment of pneumonia, but vuzin was used in the treatment of wounds. American chemists demonstrated the profound effect of the length of B.—CHEMISTRY 59 the side chain upon the bactericidal properties of substituted resorcinols. Johnson and Lane (1921) showed that the phenol coefficients of 4-n- alkylresorcinols rose steadily in the series methyl, ethyl, propyl and butyl, whilst Dohme, Cox and Miller (1926), continuing the series, found a maximum at 4-n-hexylresorcinol, which had a phenol coefficient of 50, the values for m-amyl- and n-heptyl-resorcinol being 33 and 30 respec- tively. They also showed that the antiseptic value of the m-alkylresor- cinols were greater than those of branched chain alkylresorcinols having the same number of carbon atoms. Coulthard, Marshall and Pyman (1930) studied the variation of phenol coefficient with increase in the m-alkyl-side chain in the 4-n-alkylphenols, 4-n-alkylguaiacols and in four series of m-alkyl-cresols, of which the 4-n-alkyl-m-cresols are the most important. In all cases the maximum effect was shown where the side chain was a n-amyl group. The alkyl- cresols had higher phenol coefficients than alkylphenols containing the same alkyl group, whilst the alkylguaiacols were far less active. PHENOL COEFFICIENTS. p-n-Alkylphenols. 4-n-Alkyl-m-cresols. 4-n-Alkylguaiacols. R Me R OMe xO rq OH OH m= CH, 2°5 — 2°97 C,H; 7°5 E2-5 2 n-C,H, 20 34 5 n-C,H, 70 100 25 n-C;H,, 104 280 25 n-CeHy; go 275 9 4-n-Amyl-m-cresol, which had a phenol coefficient of 280 against B. typhosus, proved to be highly bactericidal when tested against many other species of bacteria. This is shown in the following table : Concentration lethal in Rideal 7% mins. not in 5 mins. Walker. Test Organism (1) Amyl-m-cresol. (2) Phenol. Coefficient. B. coli 2 : : I-16,250 1-80 200 Staphylococcus aureus . I-20,000 I-go 220 Streptococcus faecalis. I-I5,000 I-75 200 Pharmacological experiments having shown that it had less than one- half of the toxicity of hexylresorcinol, and that it was non-toxic in medicinal doses, further work was carried out to determine its suitability for use in a mouth wash. In order to test its efficiency in this respect, different dilutions of amyl-m-cresol, compared with plain water as a control, were added to 5 c.c. of a mouth washing. ‘The mixture was 60 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES shaken thoroughly, and the bacteria left alive after 5 and 15 minutes were then estimated, with the following results : Colonies after Colonies after Tube Solution added 5 mins. 15 mins. ig 5 c.c. water 4,700 5,000 Ze 5 c.c. I : 10,000 amyl-m-cresol 4 2 as BuCHEs Tt 20.000 vg ko ay 5g 50 4 4. BVECu ee ROLCOO! ess igs 1,925 2,169 It was therefore suitable for use as an antiseptic in the oral cavity, and has been successfully introduced into medicine for this purpose. Clinical trials of 4-n-amyl-m-cresol as a urinary antiseptic, however, gave disappointing results, but this is true of phenolic bactericides generally. Fortunately, a new treatment of urinary infections was introduced by M. L. Rosenheim (1935) two years ago, which is giving excellent results. Previously, urinary infections had been treated successfully by giving patients a particular diet, known as the ketogenic diet, which was very unpleasant to take. It was also known that the principal factor inhibiting the growth of bacteria in the urine of patients receiving this diet was B-hydroxybutyric acid. This acid, however, if given orally would not be effective, because it would be oxidised in the body. Rosenheim, therefore, studied the bactericidal properties of a number of hydroxy-acids and found in mandelic acid a substance which was not oxidised in the body, was non-toxic in therapeutic doses, and was excreted unaltered in the urine, where it exerted its bactericidal effect, the degree of this increasing with increased acidity of the urine. Specific treatment of streptococcal infections has made much progress since the discovery of the properties of particular aromatic sulphonamides by the I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G., and we are looking forward to an account of investigations in this field from Prof. Dr. H. Hérlein, whom we are very glad to welcome here to-day. AMG:BICIDES. Research on ameebicides was greatly facilitated by the technique developed by Dobell and Laidlaw (1926), and Laidlaw, Dobell and Bishop (1928) for testing ameebicides zm vitro. Emetine (I) has for long been the principal drug used in the treatment of ameebic dysentery, but it has some undesirable by-effects, amongst others a nauseating effect. In a search for substances having the ameebicidal action of emetine without its nauseating effect, a number of alkaloids very closely related to emetine in chemical structure were made at an earlier period. When tested by Dale and Dobell (1917), by an early laboratory method several of them, O-methylpsychotrine (a substance which differs from emetine structurally only in containing two hydrogen atoms fewer) and N-methylemetine, for instance, were found to be more toxic to Entameeba histolytica than emetine itself. Clinical trials of O-methylpsychotrine (Jepps and Meakins, 1917) and N-methylemetine, however (Low, 1915; Wenyon B.—CHEMISTRY 61 and O’Connor, 1917), showed them to be of little or no value in the treatment of ameebic dysentery. The method of Dobell and Laidlaw, however, depending on the cultiva- tion of ameebe in a medium consisting partly of solid (inspissated fresh horse-serum) and partly of liquid (egg-white diluted with Ringer’s fluid) with a little starch, gave results which fell into line with the clinical results. Emetine was found to be fifty times as toxic to ameebz im vitro as N- methylemetine, zsoemetine, and O-methylpsychotrine, which are clinically inactive. The clinical inactivity of isoemetine (Low, 1918), a stereo- isomeride of emetine, is interesting and reminiscent of the difference between d- and /-stereoisomerides in the cases of adrenaline and hyos- cyamine. Later, Laidlaw, Dobell and Bishop described a simpler medium, consisting of 1 part of sterile horse-serum, 8 parts of Ringer’s fluid with a small quantity of sterile solid rice-starch, disodium hydrogen phosphate being added as a buffer. In this medium, they found that the amoebze were destroyed in four days by emetine 1 in 5,000,000, provided that the medium did not become too acid. We have made use of this method in the work which I am about to describe. In 1927 Brindley and Pyman suggested a constitutional formula for emetine, and in 1929 Child and Pyman synthesised a series of compounds (II) having similar constitutional features in that they contained two 6: 7-dimethoxytetrahydrozsoquinoline nuclei united through the 1: i positions by chains of methylene groups. CH, CH, AN PA i CH, bar bar, CH,O/— OCH, CH,O\_/ cH Ms ¢ OCH, I mene H CH,O Nu Fat ie bu, yc CH,O Hy, Hy, (II) When tested by Mr. Tate and Miss Vincent, working under Prof. Keilin’s direction, at the Molteno Institute at Cambridge, using the 62 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES methods employed by Laidlaw, Dobell and Bishop, none of these sub- stances prevented the growth of Entameba histolytica in culture at a dilution of 1 in 5,000, whereas the control substance, emetine, was effective at a dilution of 1 in 500,000. For the purpose of testing a further series of isoquinoline derivatives, prepared by Child and Pyman (1931), the method of Laidlaw, Dobell and Bishop was used in our own bacterio- logical department by Mr. Coulthard with the help of strains kindly given to us by Dr. Dobell. This further series was designed to find out whether the reduced benzpyridocoline ring (which is a feature of Brindley and Pyman’s formula for emetine), or other systems in which the tertiary nitrogen atom of emetine is common to two rings conferred amebicidal properties or not. This group of compounds, which included to: 11- dimethoxy-1 : 2: 3: 4: 6: 7-hexahydrobenzpyridocoline (III), proved to be but feebly active compared with emetine, for the most highly amebi- cidal member of the series g : 10-dimethoxy-3-phenyl-5 : 6-dihydro- benzglyoxalocoline (IV) only prevented the growth of Entameba histoly- tica in cultures at a dilution of 1 in 25,000, whereas the control substance, emetine, was effective in a dilution of 1 in 500,000. CH, HC CH, CH—N | 1 CH CH, CPh cH,o/ \/ CH,O X, | | CH,O ue CH,O CH, CH, CH, (III) (IV) The fact that we had now suitable strains and a technique for carrying out ameebicidal tests zm vitro led us to test a series of compounds, originally prepared for another purpose, with interesting results. This investigation had its origin in Gunn and Marshall’s (1920) dis- covery, that harmine and harmaline had some therapeutic action in malaria. Further clinical trials of these compounds, however, failed to establish their practical worth as antimalarial agents. Since harmine and harmaline are readily accessible in quantity by extraction from Peganum harmala, and their chemical constitution has features in common with those of known antimalarial agents such as quinine and plasmoquin, we thought it of interest to prepare a number of derivatives of these alkaloids in order that they might be tested for antimalarial action. Our attention had previously been focused on studies of homologous series in the course of the work on 4-n-amyl-m-cresol to which I referred earlier. This suggested to us that perhaps replacement of the methoxy-group of harmine or harmaline by higher alkyloxy-groups might yield substances of in- B.—CHEMISTRY 63 creased antimalarial action and the homologous series of normal alkyl- harmols from methylharmol (harmine) up to dodecylharmol was prepared. ~ CH,O ay VA NH CH, Through the courtesy of the Chemotherapy Committee of the Medical Research Council, some members of the series—for example, O-n-butyl- harmol and O-n-heptylharmol—were tested for activity against bird-malaria under the direction of Prof. Keilin, of the Molteno Institute, Cambridge, but were found to be inactive. The possibility that some members of these series might have other chemotherapeutic uses was then examined, and it was found that both bactericidal and amebicidal activity increased, on ascending the homo- logous series, up to a point and then started to fall. Peaks of bactericidal activity were reached at butyl for B. typhosus and at amyl for S. aureus, whilst the peak of amebicidal activity was reached at O-n-nonylharmol. R.W. Coefficients. Minimum concentration lethal Compound. B. typhosus. SS. aureus. to Entameba histolytica. Harmol I — I in 40,000 to I in 80,000 Harmine “t — O-Ethylharmol 25 — I in 80,000 O-n-propylharmol = 225 75 I in 80,000 to I in 120,000 O-n-butylharmol 350-400 150 I in 20,000 to 1 in 80,000 O-n-amylharmol 350 250-300 I in 100,000 to I in 200,000 O-n-hexylharmol 50 45-50 _I in 100,000 to I in 200,000 O-n-heptylharmol 30-35 45-50 I in 200,000 O-n-octylharmol 15 35-40 1 in 200,000 to I in 300,000 O-n-nonylharmol 10-15 15 I in 200,000 to I in 500,000 O-n-decylharmol 10 — I iN 100,000 O-n-dodecylharmol 5 — I in 100,000 not lethal The salts of this and other high members of the series were very sparingly soluble in water, and consequently a further series of compounds was prepared, with the hope of obtaining more readily soluble compounds. The method adopted was to add a further salt-forming group to the molecule in the form of a terminal dialkylamino-group, such as is employed in the antimalarials, plasmoquin (VI) and atebrin (VII). CH,CH.CH,.CH,.CH,.N(C,H;), CH ;.CH.CH,.CH,.CH,.N(C,H;), NH NH m2 C,H,O \ CH,O J Ww 22! (VI) . (VII) 64 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES In this way there were made a series of derivatives of harmol having the general formula (VIII) given below, the salts of which proved, as had been expected, to be readily soluble in water. LOANS VenAe ok NH CH, The size of both R (the N-alkyl groups) and x the number of carbon atoms in the chain separating N from O was varied, and the results may be illustrated by reference to a series in which the decyl group (x = 10) was a common factor, whilst the dialkylamino group was varied. Minimum concentration lethal Compound. to Entameba histolytica. O-x-Dimethylaminodecylharmol . I in 300,000 to I in 500,000 O-x-Diethylaminodecylharmol . . I in 200,000 to I in 500,000 O-x-Di-n-butylaminodecylharmol . I in 750,000 to I in 2,000,000 O-x-Di-n-amylaminodecylharmol _.__I in 750,000 to I in 3,000,000 O-2-Di-n-butylaminoundecylharmol . 1 in 750,000 to I in 4,000,000 O-n-Nonylharmol . , 5 . I in 200,000 to I in 500,000 Emetine hydrochloride. ; . I in 2,000,000 to I in 10,000,000 It was thus found that the activity of members at the peak of the series, such as O-)-di-n-butylaminoundecylharmol, was many times that of O-n-nonylharmol, and this fact led us to suspect that the harmol residue might not be an important contributor to the ameebicidal properties of the molecule. A number of compounds were then prepared in which dibutylaminodecyl (or undecyl) groups were introduced into molecules of varying structures, The last columns in the following tables show the limits of the range of the minimum concentration found lethal to Entameba histolytica in three days, under the conditions laid down by Laidlaw, Dobell and Bishop (loc. cit.). Minimum concentration lethal to Compound. Entameba histolytica. cqccinay Angin lad : b t bd > (C,H,),N.(CH,)1-0- PS I in 750,000 to I in 4,000,000 NH CH, Ny ; (CiH,).N.(CH)n-O- laa (C,H,).N.(CH,),,0.CO.CH, . . I in 100,000 (C,H,).N.(CH,),)0-CO.C,H, . . I in 100,000 (CyH,),N.(CH,);9N.(CyHo). . I in 2,000,000 B.—CHEMISTRY 65 It was thus shown that the attachment of the group (C,yHy).N.(CH,),9 to a simple substituted amino group gave very high efficiency. A long series of tetraalkyldiamino paraffins of the general formula NRR’.(CH,),.NRR’ was then prepared, and the minimum amebicidal concentration under the optimum conditions for emetine determined. In the first place, derivatives of heptane and decane were examined ; of the heptane series the tetraethyldiamino and tetra-n-butyldiamino compounds were prepared and tested. The tetrabutyl member of the series was superior as an ameebicide to the tetraethyl one, but neither showed more than a fraction of the efficiency of the best harmol derivative. More promising results were obtained with the corresponding decane derivatives and ultimately the efficiency of dibutylaminoundecylharmol was equalled or even, in some of our tests, surpassed. The following table shows the results of a test in which a number of decane derivatives of the general formula, R,N.(CH,),)>NR,, were examined simultaneously, so that the ‘peak’ of the series could be ascertained. This was found at «x-tetra-n-amyldiaminodecane, which was used as a standard of comparison in later work. For brevity, it is referred to below as T.A.D.D. Compound. Minimum concentration lethal ax-Decanes to E. histolytica. Tetra-n-propyldiamino_. ; 3 . I in 250,000 not lethal Tetra-n-butyldiamino : : . I in 1,500,000 Tetra-n-amyldiamino ; ; : . I in 3,000,000 (or less) Tetra-n-hexyldiamino : : 4 . I in 1,000,000 Tetra-n-heptyldiamino_. > d . 1 in 250,000 not lethal A similar test indicated that the corresponding series of undecane derivatives also showed the peak with the tetraamyldiamino member. Next, keeping a tetrabutyl or tetraamyl group constant, the hydrocarbon residue was varied. The following table shows the results of two tests - on these series of compounds. Compound. Minimum concentration lethal to E. histolytica. Test i. ae-'T'etra-n-butyldiamino- nonane . I in 800,000 decane I in 1,000,000 undecane I in 2,000,000 dodecane I in 1,500,000 tridecane I in I,000,000 Test 2. aw-'T'etra-n-amyldiamino- octane I in 400,000 nonane . I in 1,000,000 decane I in 2,000,000 undecane : . I in I,500,000 dodecane F é . I in 200,000 66 SECTIONAL ADDRESSES A number of variants on tetraamyldiaminodecane were then made in which in the place of the symmetrical tetraamyl group various other combinations were tried, with the results shown in the following table. Approximate ameebicidal efficiency Compound. in comparison with T.A.D.D. ax-Decanes. Per Cent. NBu, IN : : ; ‘ : : 100 NBuAm NBuAm . : : : : ’ ; 100 NisoAm, NisoAm, . ; : A : : ; 100 NAm, NC-Ho. ;.- : : ; ; ‘ ; 50 NMeBz NMeBz . : ’ : - , ‘ 30 NEtBz NEtBz .. : ‘ : : ‘ : 25 NPrBz NPrBze ; , ‘ , : A 20 NEtDodec NEtDodec . : A : 10 NBuDodec NBuDodec : : : Rather under 10 NCH NC;H,, (Dipiperazino) : ‘ 2 . Not Io NAm, NMePh . ‘ e A : IO NHBu NHBu sa. : é . ; Not 10 NHNon NHNon . , E : , Rather under 10 Undecanes. NHAm NHAm . é : : 3 : ’ 10 NAm, NH, ; : , : : : . 15 NAm, NHBu ss. : : : SSG : 100 NAm, NHAm . : : : ‘ 3 Over 100 NAm, NH}: % : s : : : ‘ 100 A number of compounds were then prepared in order to test the ameebicidal properties of related classes of compounds. (1) Long chain monamines. (2) Quaternary benzylammonium chlorides containing a long chain member, since members of this class have been shown by the I.G. Farbenindustrie A.G. to have marked bactericidal properties, and quaternary salts of the corresponding diamines. (3) Long chain mono- and di-amidines. (4) Compounds in which the to aliphatic carbon atoms of decane are replaced in part by 4 carbon atoms of a benzene ring, and in part by 2 atoms of oxygen. None of these approached tetraamyldiaminodecane in amebicidal efficiency in vitro, as will be seen from the individual results given below : Approximate ameebicidal efficiency Compound. in comparison with T.A.D.D. Group 1. Per Cent. Hexadecylamine ; é : Sa ye “Octon’ (methylamino-6- “methyl: 2- heptene- Birch 2 Noto Dibutylnonylamine . ae ; : 25 1 All radicles are of the normal series except where stated otherwise. B—CHEMISTRY 67 Group 2. Per Cent. Dimethyldodecylbenzylammonium chloride . ' : bia Decane-1 : 10-bis (benzyldimethylammonium chloride) . Not 10 Decane-1 : 10-bis (benzyldiamylammonium chloride) .