V-'r.-f j;;:?! =ar -,^^^^£^"fV OP Z F> METCALP LIBRARY OF 1885- IQ56 University of the State of New York NINTH REPORT ON THE Injurious and Other Insects OF THH! STATE OF NEW YORK KOR XHE YE^ AR 1 892 [From the Forty-sixth Report on the New York State Museumj By J. a. LINTNER, Ph. D., State ENTOMOLoaiST ALBANY UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 1893 CONTENTS'. PAGK. Transmittal 293 General Notes for the Year 295 Injurious Insects : Anthrenus scrophulariae and Attagenus piceus, two Carpet Beetles. . . . 299 Tenebrio obscurus (Fabr.) — The American Meal-worm 307 Pollenia rudis (Fabr.) — The Cluster Fly 309 Murgantia histrionica(H'a7w?.) — The Harlequin Cabbage-bug 315 Psylla pyricola (Foerster) — The Pear-tree Psylla 317 Chortophaga viridifasciata (De Geer) — The Green-striped Locust 330 Notes on Various Insects, etc, Eriocampa cerasi (Peck) — The Cherry-tree or Pear-tree Slug 335 PapiUo Cresphontes (Cramer) — The Yellow-banded Swallow-tail 336 Podosesia syringae (Harris) — The Syringa Borer 338 Carpocapsa pomonella (Linn.) — The Codling Moth 338 Dynastes Tityus (Linn.), as a Fruit-eater 343 Crioceris asparagi (Linn.) — The Asparagus Beetle 343 Systena frontahs (Fabr.) — Injuring Gooseberry Foliage 343 Chauliognathus Pennsylvanicus, the Pennsylvania Soldier-Beetle 344 Pissodes strobi (Peck) — The White-pine Weevil 344 Myzus cerasi (Fabr.) — The Cherry-tree Aphis 345 Pemphigus tessellata (Fitch) — The Alder-blight Aphis 346 Phylloxera vitifoliae (Fitch) — The Grapevine Phylloxera 347 Crangonyx mucronatus (Forbes), a BUnd Shrimp in Wells 347 Insectivorous Birds for Protection 349 Insect Attacks : Resistance of Fleas to Insecticides 353 White Grubs Injuring Nursery Stock 353 The White Grub Eaten by the Robin 356 A Maple-tree Pruner, Elaphidion parallelum Neivm 357 The Striped Cucumber beetle, Diabrotica vittata (Fabr.) 361 The Grape CurcuUo, Crapomus inaequalis (Say) 364 292 Contents. Insect Attacks — {Continued) : PAas. The Peach-bark Scolytus, Phlceotribus liminaris (Harris) 365 An Unrecognized Attack on Pease 368 The Plum-tree Aphis, and the Brown Rot 368 The Currant Aphis, Myzus ribis (Linn.) 870 Aphides and Myriapods as Aster and Lily Pests 371 Some Apple-tree Insects 372 Beet Insects 374 Diseased Austrian Pines 376 APPENDIX. (A) Catalogue of the Known Homopteea of the State of New York IN 1851 881 (B) Entomological Addresses 414 (C) List of Publications of the Entomologist 439 (D) Publications of the Entomologist During the Years 1870-1874,. 446 (E) Contributions to the Department , 461 {¥) Classified List of Insects Noticed in this Report 465 General Index 467 REPORT. Office of the State Entomologist, [ Albany, December 10th, 1S92. ) To the Regents of the University of the State of Neio York : Gentlemen. — I have the honor of presenting to your Board my Ninth Report on the Injurious and Other Insects of the State of New York, embracing some of the studies and observations of my department during the current year. The year has been one of remarkable exemption from insect injuries, as the result, beyond question, of meteorological con- ditions unfavorable to the multiplication of our more common insect pests. This has been particularly noticeable in the very few complaints that have been received of injuries to fruits — certainly not one-fifth of the average of preceding years. While this, in part, may be ascribed to the better knowledge of methods of dealing with the enemies of fruits to which our fruit-growers are becoming educated, and to the rapidly growing use of insecticides and spraying implements, certain it is that several of our more noxious insects, which almost annually are the cause of serious injury, did not present themselves in sulhcient number to call for active operations against them. Thus, apple trees for the most part, escaped their customary early spring visitation of the aphis, Aphis mail. The cherry-tree aphis, Myzus cerasi, was not prevalent. The orchard tent-caterpillar, Clisiocampa Atnericana^ was far less abundant than in preceding years. Not a single communication came to me relating to the operations of the eye-spotted bud -moth, Tmetocera ocellana, which had been exceedingly destructive in 1S91, and a general cause of complaint from the orchardists of Western New York. The pear-tree Psylla, Psylla pyricola, which threatened, in its excessive increase, to extend its destruction to pear trees in the Hudson river valley to other portions of the State, has not, during the past season, inflicted any appreciable harm. 294 FoRTT-siXTH Report on the State Museum No very severe attacks have been reported to me upon either garden or field crops. No complaint has reached me of injury to any of our grains from the grain aphis, Siphonophora avenoe, although again appearing in Columbia county, nor did the hop- vine aphis, Phorodon huinuli^ very materially affect the yield of our hop yards. The year has further been an exceptional one in that no new insect pest of marked economic importance has come under my notice calling for special investigation. Several of the minor attacks to which my attention has been drawn, will be noticed in the " Notes for the Year," to follow. It was hoped that time would have been found to enable me to complete for publication some studies commenced in former years, but this has been prevented by a serious and protracted illness. I have also reason to regret that owing to this illness, I was compelled to cancel a number of engagements for address- ing the farmers and fruit-growers of our State and scientific bodies, during the winter months. While the work of this Department would be largely extended and promoted by attend- ance at such meetings, it would at the same time make ample returns to your entomologist in information that he could not as well obtain through any other means. The addition to the State Collection for tlie 3^ear has been over 2,500 specimens. Memoranda commenced on April 1st, show the number of specimens collected by me, 2,419. Of these 2,323 have been labeled and 1,411 mounted. The Contributors to the Collection number fifty-three. A list of their contributions is appended to this Report. The cus- tomary list of the publications of* the entomologist during the year, embracing thirty-three titles, accompanied with brief sum- maries of contents, will also be found in the Appendix. The additional room and cases for which arrangements had been made, as stated in my report for 1891, have not yet been provided. This want has interfered with and impeded work which has been commenced in the classification of the biological material, both dry and in alcohol, and which is not at present conveniently accessible for reference or for study. Respeccfully submitted. J. A. LINTNEK GENERAL NOTES FOR THE YEAR. In the absence of any serious outbreak of insect injury during the year, the following notes on some of the more common species that are with us in greater or less abundance annually, may be put on record. The fall tent-caterpillar, Hyphantria cunea (Drury), has been noticeably abundant in various parts of the State — in Oswego county and elsewhere. The injury to the foliage of the elm and horse-chestnut trees on the streets of Albany by the caterpillar of the white-marked tussock-moth, Orgyia leucostigina (Sm.-Abb.), which has been remarked upon in preceding reports, was again quite serious during the past summer. The falling to the pavement of the tips of the elm twigs, consequent on the girdling of the stem by the young larva? for food, was not nearly as abundant as that noticed in 1883 (see Second Report on the Insects of New York) and in some subsequent years, nor was the insect so gen- erally distributed throughout the city. But in certain localities, at about the time of cocoon spinning, the caterpillars could be seen by hundreds on the sidewalls of corner houses, as upon m}" own residence shaded by several large elms. A row of tall elms opposite had the foliage so severely eaten during the months of June and July as no longer to serve the purpose of shade, and not to be recognizable as elms at a short distance from them. Several horse-chestnut trees in the vicinity were entirely defoliated, except that portions of the larger ribs were left uneaten. The Dryoccmipa ruhicunda (Fabr.) caterpillar very seldom appears in harmful numbers in New York or the eastern States, but an excep- tional occurrence of it was reported from Monticello, Sullivan county, N. Y., on the grounds of Mr. John D. Lyons, where a number of soft maple trees, which had been set out by him a few years, before, were completely defoliated by it during the sunmier. In several of the western States, as notably in Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska, the soft maples planted as shade trees in cities are annually almost stripped of their foliage.* ♦ Bulletin No. 14, vol. ill, 1890, of the Agricultural Experiment Station of Nebraska, pp. 54-69. 296 FORTY-STXTH REPORT ON THE StATE MuSEUM The cabbage Plusia, Plusia hrassicoe (Riley), which is so great a pest to cabbage growers in the southern States, but is by no means common in the State of New York (see Second Report on the Insects of New YorTc), has been complained of as giving much trouble in a gi'een- house at Garden City, L. I., N. Y. Rev. Dr. Cox has written of it : " The caterpillar specially affects young parsley, but will also feed con- tinuously on heliotrope, pelargium, and, in fact, on almost any green thing." The canker-worm, Anisopteryx vernata (Peck), was so abundant in some orchards in Monroe county as to have nearly destroyed the foliage. Orchards in Cooperstown, Otsego county, were so despoiled by the caterpillars as to present the appearance of having been scorched and shriveled by fire. The apple-worm of the codling-moth, Garpocapsa potnonella, was less injui'ious than usual throughout most of the State. An extensive fruit-grower and nurseryman of Rochester has written me of it : " Codling-moths in our orchards .were almost extinct, it being difficult to find an apple with the larva or its burrows in it. I can not account for this, as ordinarily they are very abundant with us." Although I have stated that nothing had been reported to me of injuries from the eye-spotted bud-moth, Tnietocera ocellana (Schiff.), during the year, I have since learned, on special inquiry, that it has been continuing its ravages in Western New York, Avithout diminution, but rather on tlie increase, and that it threatens to become a permanent pest. The cow- horn fiy, Hmnxatohia serrata R. Desv., the introduction of which into New York was announced in my preceding report, has during the year become generally distributed over the State. It is known to me to occur in forty-four of the sixty counties, and with scarcely a doubt is present in each one. The rapidity with which thi^ insect has spread throughout the country is almost, or quite, without a parallel in the histories of our imported pests. First known in the United States only six years ago, it has at the present time become an annoying pest to cattle in New England, Florida, Mississippi, Kansas, and many of the intermediate States, and in Canada from the western part of the Province almost to Quebec. Severe injuries to potatoes and to strawberry plants from the white grub of, probably, Lachnosterna fiisca (Frolil.), were reported from Cattaraugus county. Examples, for identification, of Lachnosterna tristis (Fabr.) were received from Mr. J. S, Smart, of Cambridge, Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 297 Washington count}^ whioh liad appeared in large companies in the month of May in localities in the neighborhood and devoured the foliage of trees, showing a preference for the sugar maples. The elm tree beetle, Galerucella Xanthomelaena (Schr.), or G. luteola Mull., as we may, in obedience to the law of priority be obliged to call it, has not, so far as we know, reached Alban}'- in its steady northward progress. It is said to have done mucli damage to elms in Dutchess county in June. One of the Chrysomelid flea-beetles, Systena frontalis (Fabr.), was observed as quite destructive to the foliage of the gooseberry at the Geneva Agricultural Experiment Station, early in August. It is believed that this is the first time it has been found to attack the gooseberry. The Colorado potato beetle, Doryphora decemlineata (Say), although twenty years have passed ^ince it tirst entered the State of New York, is still continuing with us, — less abundantly in some y-'ars than in others, but always in sufiicient numbers to call for ])rotection from its destruc- tiveness by the use of Paris green or London purple. Spraying or sprinkling the vines with one of the arsenites is now quite generally practiced throughout the State. During the year it has been reported as doing much damage in Chautauqua and Albany counties, but perhaps not greater than in other counties where no mention of its injuries has been maie. In its progress northwardh'" the insect has reached Prince Edward Island, in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, north latitude 46 1^ degrees, and has caused great damage to the potato crop the present year. The plum curculio, Gonotrachelus neitnphar (Herbst), was quite harmful to plums in Orange and other of the Hudson river counties, and in Monroe county about Rochester. The little Curculiouid beetle, Otlurhy)ichus ovtUus (Linn.), for some unexplained reason, frequently intrudes in large numbers in dwelling- houses. In August, examples for name were received from Moriches, Long Island, where they were infesting a house to the extent of being an annoyance to the household. For notice of some similar occurrences see my 2d Report, page 51, 4th Report, page 14, and 6th Report, page 107; also Insect Z,lf'e, v, page 46. The insect is known to be very destructive to the plants that it attacks, but as it is strictly phytophagic, no fear need be entertained of injury from its presence in houses. The grass crop was materially injured in some of the western coun- ties of the State by an unusual number of " grasshoppers " (locusts), probably Melanoplus femur-rubrum (De Geer), and allied species. 1893. 38 298 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum Some alarm was excited in portions of Columbia county by an early appearance of multitudes of young " grasshoppers " while snow was yet on the ground. It was feared that their abundance at this time betokened an excessive multiplication as the season advanced. The insect, from examples received, was ascertained to be the young of "the green-striped locust," Chortojyfiaga viricllfasciata (De Geer). A notice of it and of its occasional winter appearances is contained in this report. As a possible addition to the faunal list of our drinking waters may be named a species of Ephemera — one of the " day-flies." Severa' examples of it were received in April from Professor G. C. Hodges, of the Utica Academy, with the information that they had been taken from a water-filter in Utica. From a notice contained in the Utica Observer of April 25th, it appears that the filter was one that was con- nected with a fountain on a lawn. The little orifices through which the water escaped having become clogged, the cap was taken off, and, on examination, a large accumulation of the May-fly larvae was found. Two days thereafter the same trouble recurred, and with the same results. Some of the larvae were sent to Washington for com" parison, where they were identified as, in all probability^, belonging to the genus Ephemera, but as there were no named larvae of the family Ephenieridm in the collections of the National Museum, no more definite determination could be made. Among other living forms which in previous years have come under my obser\'ation as having been drawn from water-faucets in dwelling- houses in Albany where their occurrence might have been inconvenient if not dangerous, are examples of Gordius, or the so-called "hair- snake," a blood leach of considerable size, and a specimen of the large intestinal worm, AscarU himbricoides with several inches in convoluted form of its extruded ovaries crowded with its countless eggs (now in the collection of the New York State'Museum). INJURIOUS INSECTS. Anthrenus scrophulariae (Linn): Attagenus piceus (Oliv.). Two Carpet Beetles. (Ord. Coleoptera: Fam. Dermestid.k.) LiNNiEUS: Faun. Suec, 1761, p. 429 (Dermestes); Syst. Nat., 1767, i, pars ii, p. 568. 1 (Byrrhus). FABRIcros: Syst. Ent,. 1775, p. 61. 2; Spec. Ins., i, 1781, p. 70. 2; Mant. Ins., i,^ 1787, p. 39. 2 (Dermestes); Syst. Eleuth., 1801, p. 107. Lamarck: Hist. Nat. An. Sans. Vert., iv, 1835, p. 724. Melsheimer: in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., ii, 1844, p. 117 (describes A. thoracicus, now regarded as a variety of A. scrophularice). LeConte: in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., vii, 1854, p. 112 (describes A. flavijies and A. lejndus and A. thoracicus, now regarded as varieties of A. scrophularice); in Proc. Acad. Nat Sci. Phil., 1876, p. 195 (occurrence at Albany); in Bull. G.-G. Surv. Terr., ii, 1879, p. 503 (Rocky Mts. at 6,000 ft. altitude). Lintner: in The Argus [Albany, N. Y.], Oct. 21, 1876; in Schenectady Union,. Oct. 21, 1876; in Trans. N. Y. St. Agr. Soc, xxxii, for 1872-1876, p. 236; in Count. Gent., May 31 and June 7, 1877, xlii, pp. 347, 363; in id., Aug. 2, 1877, p. 491, c. 2-4 (stages, history, remedies, attraction to flowers, etc.); Entomolog. Contrib., iv, June, 1878, pp. 15-23, figs, a-d; in Anier. Nat., xii, Aug., 1878, pp. 536-544, figs, la, b, c, d; in Count. Gent., Sept. 12, 1878, xliii, p. 583, c. 2, 3; in Proc. Albany Institute, ii, 1878, pp. 310-313; in Count. Gent., Aug. 7, 1879, p. 503, c. 4; in Thirtieth Rept. N. Y. St. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1879, pp. 127-135 (general account); in Johnson's Nat. Hist., ii, 1880, p. 651, figs, a-d (brief notice of stages, etc.); First Rept. Ins. N. Y., 1880, pp. 9, 10, fig. 5 (brief notice); in Count. Gent., Aug. 23. 1883, xlviii, p. 681, c. 2 (its food and remedies); in Amsterdam Daily Democrat, July 21. 1884, p. 3, c. 3, 4 (habits, remedies, etc.); in Count. Gent., Aug. 14, 1884, xlix, pp. 676, fi77, c. 4, 1 (history, habits, transformations, remedies, and preventives); in American Cyclopedia, iv, 1883, p. 797; Second Rept. Ins. N. Y. ,^ 1885, p. 46 (mention): Fifth Rept. Ins. N. Y., 1889, pp. 267, 268, fig. 38 (habits and as a museum pest); Sixth Rept. Ins. N. Y., 1890, p. 118,. fig. 11 (Adalia mistaken for it); in Count. Gent., Aug. 21, 1890, Iv, p, 662, c. 3 (remedies); Seventh Rept. Ins. N. Y., 1891, p. 33.^ (introduction). 300 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum Saunders: in Rept. Ent. Soc. Ont. for 1878, pp. 33-35, fig. 14 (from Lintner in Amer. Nat.). » Hagen: in Proc. Bost. Soc. Nat. H., xx, 1878, p. 57 (noticed as a museum pest); in Canad. Entomol., x, 1878, p. 161 the same with figures, in Rept. Ent. Soc. Ont. for 1879, pp. 30, 31, fig. 1; in Boston Journal for July 15, 1879. Riley: in N. Y. Tribune, Dec. 1, 1878 (ravages and remedies, figs.) id., for Dec. 4, 1878 (food-habits, and spread); in Amer. Entomol., iii, 1880, pp. 53-55, fig. 15 (trapping the beetle); in Insect Life, ii, 1889, pp. 127- 130, fig. 19 (general account). Jayne: in Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc, xx, 1882, p. 369, figs. 66, 69 (descriptions). Apgar: in Science, for Nov. 21, 1884, iv, p. v (unaffected by Naphthaline), Weed: in Prairie Farmer, Sept. 10, 1887, p. 582, c. 2 (ravages in Michigan). Hamilton: in Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc, xvi, 1889, p. 129 (its varieties). Fernald: Bull. No. 5, Hatch Exp. St. Mass., July, 1889, pp. 3-6, fig. 1. Beutenmuller: in Journal N. Y. Microscop. Soc, vii, 1891, p. 14 (bibliography of early stages). Dermestes piceus OlA\'VE.R: Entomol., ii, 1790, p. 10, pi. 1, fig. 4 a, 6; Encyc. Method. Hist. Nat Ins., vi, 1790, p. 267. Dermestes megatoma Fabricius: Ent. Syst. Supp., 1798, p. 71. 1; Syst. Eleuth., i, 1801, p. 813. 5. Attagunus spurcus LeConte: in Proc Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., vii, 1854, p. 109. Attagenus dichrous LeConte: in Proc. Acad. N. S. Ph., viii, 1854, p. 110. Attageaus rufipennis LeConte: in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phil., 1859, p. 71. Attagenus sp. ? Walsh: in Pract. Entomol., i, 1866, p. 34 (in feathers). Attagenus megatoma. Provancher: Pet. Faun. Ent. Can., — Coleop., 1877, p. 305. Attagenus megatoma. Hagen: in Proc. Bost. Soc. N. H., xx, 1878, pp. 56, 61 (as a museum pest). Attagenus megatoma. Lintner: in Count. Gent., xliv, 1879, p. 503 (feeds on carpets; icL, xl vii, 1882, p. 567, c. 2 (description); Ent, Contrib., iii, 1882, p. 64 (remedy); Second Rept. Ins. N. Y., 1885, pp. 46-48 (general notice of habits, etc). Attagenus megatoma. Riley: in Amer. Nat., xvi, 1882, p. 1019 (causes felting); in Rural New Yorker, Oct. 14, 1882, xU,pp. 699, 700 (felting); in Amer, Nat., xvii, 1883, p. 790, Attagenus picetis Jayne: in Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc, xx, 1882, p. 355 (descrip- tion), p, 374, pi, 1, figs. 22, 23 (antennas). Attagenus megatoma. Dimmock: in Cassino's Stand. Nat. Hist., ii, 1884, p. 378 (feather felting), Attagenus joiceus. Henshaw: List. Coleop. N. A., 1885, p. 54, No. 3434. Attagenus piceus. Fernald: in Bull. 5. Hatch Agr. Exp, St., July, 1889, p, 6, Attagenus piceus. Hamilton: in Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc, xvi, 1889, p, 129 (distribution), Attagenus megatoma. Riley-Howard: in Insect Life, ii, 1890, pp. 317-318 (feather felting); in id., iii, p. 170 (in houses). Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 301 Attagenus piceus. Riley-Howard: in Insect Life, iii, 1890, p. 34 (incr. and inj. in Washington); pp. 65, 66 (injuring carpets); id., iv, 1893, p. 345 (abundance and injury in Illinois), p. 404 (feather felting). Attagenus piceus. Beutenmuller: in Journ. N. Y. Microscop. Soc, vii, 1891, p. 14 (bibliography of larval descriptions). Both of the above-named insects have been briefly noticed in former reports, but so frequent are the inquiries received in relation to them, and so serious the injuries that they inflict, that some additional notes on them may be acceptable and prove of service. The publication of a Bulletin, to contain all that seemed desirable for practical purposes and of interest to know, which could serve as a convenient reply to the many inquiries made, has been in contemplation for some time, but it still awaits the leisure for its preparation. In the meanwhile the bibliography herewith presented should be of service to those desiring to learn more of its history and habits. Some Features of Anthrenus scrophulariae In the accompanying diagrammatic di'a wings (after Jayne) represent- ing the markings of the beetle as seen from above, a is that of the typical serophularim. In comparison with Figure 2, reproduced from former reports, it more faithfully repre- sents the hundreds of examples that have come under ray observa- tion, in the extended white mar- ginal bordering of the thorax; while the white spots near the outer border of the Aving-cover Fig. 1.— Anthrenus scROPHCLARia:: a, thetypi- . „V.o».r.Kr Aa^nc^A on/l fnW +.-> calform; 6, var.PLAviPKs; c, var. thoracicus; 3.16 lOO buarpiy uenneu ana laii lo d, then-jointed antenna. connect with the red projections from the sutural line so as to form the irregular transverse bands. It should be remembered that the line (sutural) along the joining of the wing- covers and its three inward projections are orange- red, and a striking characteristic of the species. \ There are, however, marked differences in orna- mentation, which are to some extent local : two varieties bear the name of var. jiavipes LeConte, (shown at h in Figure 1), and var. thoracica Mels., at represented, by means of which it may be separated from the other species of the genus. c. At d, the Il-jointed clubbed antenna is p^ijLARiJ7f^omRUeyo 302 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum Ignorance Respecting the Carpet Beetles. Almost every newspaper published in the United States has contained some account of the dreadful " carpet beetle " or " buffalo bug," giving its habits, describing its appearance, often accompanied by figures rep- resenting its different stages; still, there are many who are not able to distinguish it from a harmless lady-bug when they find the two in intimate association in rooms where carpets and clothing are evidently suffering from " carpet bug " attack. The following letter, from Poughkeepsie, N, Y., in which this ignor- ance is displayed, is one of many of a similar tenor: I herewith send you a small vial containing what is believed to be the carpet-bug in two, perhaps three, forms of its existence. The creature is giving us much trouble and injuring valuable property. If you can aid in identifying the animal, and in stopping its ravages, you will con- fer a great favor on many sufferers. The little lady-bug has been found in great numbers about our dwell- ings, and in such relation to injured carpets, etc., as to create the belief that it is the veritable carpet-bug; but if I am right in supposing that the insect I send you is the " real. Simon-pure " little pest, then the pet lady-bug has been more " sinned against than sinning." E. L. B. Larval features of the two Insects. The vial contained a specimen of the veritable carpet bug, which has become such a formidable household pest, but in its larval stage only — not in subsequent forms of its existence. In company with it was another larva and two perfect beetles. The larva of the obnox- ious Anthrenus scrophularice was the one of an oval form, and clothed with stiff bristles standing out from it. It has received (perhaps in California, where it first became known in this country,) the name of the " buffalo-bug," from a fancied resemblance in its large and hairy front, to that animal. The other larval form — of a reddish-brown color, with appressed hairs — long, slender, tapering to its tail, and ending in a pencil of hairs, — is also a carpet-bug, and the earlier stage of the two black beetles which were sent with it. It was for a long time known to science as Attagenus megatoma (Fabr.), but a few years since was found to have been earlier described by Olivier under the specific name of piceus. Attagenus piceus detected as a Carpet pest. • At the time of my detection of the Anthrenus carpet bug at Schenec- tady, the larva of A, 2^^ceus was associated with it. It was at first supposed that it was drawn to the borders of carpets to feed upon the dead bodies of flies and other insects that collected there, in accord- Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 303 ance with the general habits of the Dermestidai. Subsequently I have reared it upon pieces of carpets, and complaints have been received from Boston and elsewhere of its carpet-eating propensities. It may possibly prove to be almost as destructive to carpets as the A. scrophularice, for there can not be much doubt that its food is the same, and that it multiplies with equal rapidity. Its Abundance. Already in some houses it has become the more numerous. In my own residence the beetle has fallen under my observation, on window panes, thrice as often as its prettily ornamented rival. As it will assuredly ere long win a notoriety for itself, a common name will have to be selected for it, now that we have two "carpet-bugs", comparatively "new," both being beetles in their perfect form. Until a better name shall be found, this may be known as "the black carpet-beetle." Description of the Beetle. A brief description may be of value for its identification. It meas- ures 0.15 to 0.18 inch in length. In outline it is elongate-oval, twice as long as it is wide, and rather flattened. Its head is small and so bent downward as hardly to be seen from above in cabinet speci- mens, but extended, and with its antennae conspicuous, when walk- ing; both it and the prothorax are black. The wing-covers are more or less reddish, finely punctured, Mith a short gray pubescence in fresh examples under a magnifier. The legs'and the antennoe are red- dish: the latter terminating, in a „ „ , . . ' ^ ^ Fig. 3. — Attaoenus pigkus; a, antenna of large ovate club, the last joint of male; 6. antenna of female. (After Jayne.) which is grayish. Abdomen beneath, brown with short ochreous-yel- low hairs. Legs brown. Outlines of the beetle and of its antennae are given in Figure 3. Food of the Larva of Attagenus Piceus. This insect by no means confines itself in feeding to woolens, but like others of the Dermestldm, its larva feeds largely upon dried ani- mal matter. In the notice of ^^ Attagenus megatoma,''^ in the Second Report on the Lisects of New York, 1885, pp. 46-48, its occur- rence in hair-cloth furnitui-e is mentioned, and the suspicion is 304 • FoRTT-siXTH Report on the State Museum expressed that it eats lace curtains and other cottons, and that its range of food may embrace '*hair, furs, cotton, linen, and wool." Even Anthrenus scrophularice, which in this country is hardly known except as a woolen pest, is developing a fondness for insects in collections, while in Europe it is recorded as eating furs, hides, leather, dried plants, animal collections, "all kinds of collections of natural objects, and victuals."* Dr. Hagen in his interesting paper on " Museum Pests, observed in the Entomological Collection at Cambridge," mentions the species as " exceedingh^ dangerous " to the collection.** Feather-felting by Attagenus piceus. Professor Riley has recorded an instance of a remarkable felting of the inside of a pillow ease with the soft parts of the chicken feathers with which it had been filled, through the feeding operations of this insect. The short, downy particles which had been stripped off were found inserted by their basal ends, the barbs of which would be caught by the repeated shakings and firmly anchored. "The felting was remarkably dense, evenly coating the whole surface of the ticking, and greatly resembling in softness, smoothness, and color the fur of a mole."f Another similar occurrence was related by Dr. Horn, and a specimen " resembling fine plush " exhibited to the American Entomological Society. J Remedies for the Carpet Beetles. The best remedies for the two carpet beetles are, frequent searches for their larviB in their haunts and crushing them, and the application of kerosene or benzine to the places where the eggs and young larvae occur. The favorite locality for the A. scrophularim, as is probably known to most housekeepers by this time, is beneath the borders of carpets, and in the floor joinings underneath. These crevices should first be thoroughly treated with kerosene, and then closed with putty, or a packing saturated with kerosene." The crevices beneath the base boards should also be closed; by these means the retreat and escape of the larvjB will be almost entirely prevented, when the borders of the carpet are lifted for a thorough search for the larvae, as should by all means be done, from time to time, in an infested house. The examina- * Hagen: in Canadian Entomologist, x, 1878, pp. 161, 163. ** Proceedings of the Boston Society of Natural History, xx, 1878, p. 61 . t American Naturalist, xvl, 1882, p. 1018. i Transactions of the American Entomological Society, x, 1883, p. xvii. NiyTH Report of the State Entomologist 305 tion will be more coiivenienl and i>ro(liK'tive oi" better results if the carpet is left unnailed. Possibility of Freeing Infested Houses from the Insect. That freeing a house from the presence of this exceedingly annoying and destructive pest, is not a hopeless task, will a])pear from the account given by a correspondent of her successful campaign against it. The prefatory reference to her first acquaintance with the insect is of suffi- cient interest to quote, particularly as it gives an earlier time \i\ several years for its observation in this country than had been previously recorded.* How a House was Freed from A. scrophulariae. In November, 18S8, Mary E. Clark, of New Yovk city, wrote to me as follows: It may not be uninteresting to 3'ou if I add my mite to the information already gained in regard to these insects. I tirst heard of them about twenty years ago at which time they were quite domesticated in parts of Montgomery count}^ Penn. The people called them " woolly- heads," and one who lived there described them to me as looking like a little piece of black avooI. A few years later — I think about 1868 — when visiting a friend on Long Island, I saw quite a number of them: they had made their appearance only a short time previously, and before their prei«ence was known had made great havoc with the carpets. My own experience with them began last year. We moved to oui- present abode in April, and it was not until every carpet had l)een put down and the house settled that I was aware that we had such unwel- come guests. I was not long in observing their habit of running into any crack or crevice that presented itself, and also running along the joints of the floors, and our warfare against them was directed toward these joints. In the closets we stopped up every nook on the walls; every crevice under the base boards, and filled up the joints of the floor; then Ave laid down oil-cloth, and kept a plentiful supply of camphor in the closets. I am happy to say that we have had no trouble with them since so doing. Fortunately, Ave had put paper under all the carpets, so Ave felt that they Avere in a measure, at least, protected, but I found them continually, just under the edges of the carpet. As far as possible, A\'e filled up the crevices under the baseboards and I used benzine very j^lentifullv all the summer, saturating the borders of the carpets e\'ery tAvo A\-eeks * Examples of it, labeled Anihrenus lepidus, in the cabinet of Dr. LeConte had been received from Oregon ■' in 1871 or 1872." Dr. Hagen had heard of its operations in Buffalo, N. Y., in 1672. The first notice of its injuries was seen by me in 1874, and in 1876, examples were taken in my house at Schenectady, N. Y., and the new household pest brought to public notice. Its earlier observation in Pennsylvania accords with the statement made to me some time ago by a gentle- man living in that State (the time and place have escaped my memory), that he had reason to believe that he was chargeable with its introduction into this country in a trunk which was found to contain them on his return from Europe. 1893 39 306 Forty-sixth Report oa the State Museum and killing all I saw in the meantime. Last spring we varnished the cracks of the floors, and in some cases, where they were very open, covered them with strips of thin muslin stuck down with the varnish; we again put paper under the carpets, as we had found it such protection the previous year. I have found the various insect powders of no use whatever when the insect is in the larval state : whether or not it has any effect on the beetle I can not say; but this I can state, — that our unceasing warfare has not been in vain, for I have, during the past summer, seen only single ones where last year I found scores. The Two-spotted Lady-bug, mistaken for the Anthrenus Beetle. " The little lady-bug " mentioned in the inquiry from Poughkeepsie as occurring in great numbers in association with the carpet beetles, is the two-spotted lady-bug, Adalia hipvnctata (Linn. ) . It has frequently been mistaken for the carpet-beetle, and has come to an untimely end inconsequence — in some instances having been collected on dust- pans and burned. It is unfortunate that such mistakes should occur, since it is to this insect more than to any other that we are often indebted Fig. 4— The two-spotted for deliverance from a plant-louse infestation of \. lady-bug Adalia bt- fvnit-trees, shrubs, and flowers. It has no resem- punctata (after Em- mons). blance Avhatever to the carpet-beetle, than which it is many times larger (see figures of the two in my 6th Report) ; the only reason for confusing it with the carpet pest is that it enters dwelling-houses in the autumn for passing the winter (the only one of the lady-bugs having this habit), and is frequently to be met with col- lected in corners underneath the carpets, or creeping or flying about when fires have been made in rooms ordinarily cold. It seems strange that, in this enlightened age, any household could be found in which none of- its members could recognize so typical a lady- bird as the Adalia and know of its entire harmlessness. The lady- birds are quite common insects : they are attractive in their bright shining colors and conspicuous maculation; their form is peculiar — "gotten up," as a reportorial wit has recently expressed it, "on the architectural lines of a split pea;" for centuries they have been cherished objects of admiration in the countries of the Old World, where peculiar associations or superstitions have been con- nected with them. From some one of these has doubtless been bor- rowed the motherly couplet that all of us have heard in our childhood and have ourselves uttered when some one of these pretty creatures had run up to finger-tip'and was about to unfold its wings for flight : Lady -bird, lady-bird, fly away home, Your house is on fire, your children will bum. N'iNTu Report of the IState Entomologist 307 Tenebrio obscurus Fabr. The Americait Jfeal-ioorm.. (Orel. Coleopibra: Fam. Tenebrionid-e.) Fabricius: Ent. Syst., i, pars i, 1792, p. 111. 5. Westwood: Classif. Insects, i, 1839, p. 318 (larva and habits). Curtis: Farm Insects, 1860, p. 334. Walsh: in Pract. Entomol., ii, 1866, p. 34 (bri.ef notice). Provancher: Pet. Faun Ent. Canada — Coleop., 1877, p. 448 (description). Le Baron: 4tli Kept. Ins. 111., 1874, p. 123, f. 57 (figure only). Gissler: in Bull. Brook. Ent. Soc, i, 1878, p. 87 (of the larva). Riley: in Anier. Naturalist, xvii, 1883, p. 547 (number of molts). Lintner: in Count. Gent., Ivii, 1892, p. 501 (habits, remedies, etc.}. BeutenmOller: in Journ. Microscop. Soc. vii, 1891, p. 41 (bibliography of early stages). Although rather a common insect, very little seems to have been written of it by our economic entomologists, as appears from the quite limited bibliography presented above. Examples of it were recently received from Buckland, Virginia, asking for information of their habits, as they had appeared in large numbers in a granary where wheat was stored. The Larva and the Beetle. It is greatly to be regretted that so few of our Coleoptera have been described, and of those few, many have been done in so general terms and so indifferently that they do not serve the purpose of identifica- tion, I am not aware of any description of T. obscurus. It may be said of it, as aid to its recognition when met with in the localities where it is apt to occur, that it is about an inch long, cylindrical, smooth, of an ochreous or pale-brown color, and with three pairs of legs on its front or thoracic segments, and that it has much the appear- ance of the common wire- worm. But this would apply equally well to several other species of the family of Tenebrlonldcr* The larva is shown at a in Figure 5. Perhaps the best specific characters in the larval Tenebrio are to be found in their pygidium — the designation of the upper part of the last abdominal segment. Mr, C F, Gissler, loc. cit., has given some study to the larva' of the Tenebrionidm, indicating pygidial differences between them. Of T. obscurus he finds: " Pygidium comparatively * See the excellent and greatly needed remarks made by one of our able Coleopterlsts, Mr. E. A. Schwarz, on many of the published " descriptions of Coleopterous larvae which are wholly wanting in either popular or scientific value," in the Canadian Entomologist, xxiv, 1892, page 233. 308 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum small, cordiform, with two minute articulated spines on each side, a little behind the middle, a median longitudinal groove, one lateral punctured notcli^ and two terminal small, siiddenly turned-up hooks." A figure is also given of the " pygidium of Teuebrio," presumably of T. obscurus, which would seem to imperfectly illustrate the text, unless for "punctured notch" Ave read "punctured spot." The two terminal hooks, according to Westwood, distinguish the larva of this species from that of T. molitor (see*Westwood, loc. cit.). The beetle, described in general terms, which should suffice for its recognition when taken in connection with its figure herewith given, is over a half inch in length, narrow, of a dull, opaque, black color above, with the underside, the feet and antennae chestnut-brown. The tho- rax is subquadrate. The elytra, or wing-covers, are closely ])unctured with sixteen depressed Fig. 5— The meal worm, longitudinal lines, the intervals of which Tenebrio obscurus: a, i ^ i n^i i ^ ^ ^i i • i larva; 6, pupa; c, imago; 3.ve angulated. 1 he legs are stout; the hinder maxHi^r/, "fabrurn;' 9, ^^^^ ^^^ f our-jointcd — the Others are five- terminal segment. (From • • - j RUey.) jointed. Its Habits. The name of the "American meal-worm" has been given to this insect to distinguish it from a closely resembling species, Tenebrio molitor, which has been introduced from Europe and has become much more common with us than the native one. It is the more injurious of the two, as it prefers for its food diy and sound flour, while T. molitor is more fi'equently found in that which has become damp or otherwise damaged. T. obsexrus is said to feed sometimes on animal matter. Both of the species infest granaries, mills, and farm houses, and are justly regarded as very troublesome pests when thej^ have gained a lodgment, it being a difficult task to exterminate them. Remedy. The best remedy for this, as for most of the other stored grain insects, as Silvaw's iSurinamensis (Linn.), ^S'. cassim Reiche, /S. advena (Waltb.), Calandt'agrcmaria^Linn.), C. or i/zce (Liun.), C.remotejnincta Gyll., Triboliurti ferruginewn (Fabr.), Sitotroga cerealella (Oliv.), and others, is found in the use of bisulphide of carbon. The infested grain should be inclosed in a tight bin, and for each one hundred pounds, one ounce of the bisulphide of carbon may be placed in any convenient open vessel on top of the grain. It need not be inserted therein, as Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 309 has been directed by some writers, for the heavy vapor (about two and one-half times heavier than common air) will descend and permeate the mass and destroy the insect life — the beetle, the larva*, or the eggs deposited on the grain. After a day or two the bin may l)e oj>ened for the offensive odor to escape, and no injury will have been done to the grain, either for flouring, for feeding, or for seed. It would be well in all cases where badly infested grain has been treated in the above manner, especialh' Avhen it is to be converted into flour, to remove the dead insects by sifting or otherwise, as it is believed that bad results have followed the use of flour into which the elytra and dead bodies of the infesting insects had been ground uj). In consideration of the explosive nature of bisul})hide of carbon, it is proper always to accompany the recommendation of its use with the caution that a light or fire should never be brought near it. Pollenia rudis (Fabr.). The Cluster Fly. (Ord. Diptera: Fam. Muscid.e.) Fabricius: Ent. Syst., iv, 1794, p. 314. 9 (as Musca rndis). Macquart: Hist. Nat. Ins.— Dipteres, ii, 1835, p. 269 (as Pollenia). Rob. Desvoidy: Hist. Dipt. Env. Paris, ii. 1863, p. 600. LOEW: in Amer. Journ. Sci.-Arts, 2d ser., 1864, xxxvii, pp. 318, 331 (introduced from Europe). Harris: Entomolog. Corr. , 1869, p. 336 (as Mn sea familiar is). Osten-Sacken: Cat. Dipt. N. Amer., 1878, p. 160. Mann: in Psyche, iii, 1883, p. 378 (liabits). Dall: in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., v, 1884, p. 635 (habits). Riley: in Amer. NaturaUst, xvii, 1883, pp. 82, 83; in Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., v, 1884, pp. 637, 638 (habits, synonymy, etc.). Marlatt: in Insect Life, iv, 1891, p. 153 (killed by fungus). LlNTNER: in Count. Gent., Ivii, 1892, p. 358 (general notice). Riley-Howard: in Insect Life, v, 1893, p. 263 (in Illinois, habits, remedy, etc.). Pollenia rudis (the Musca rudis of Fabricius) was known and name given to it in Europe a century ago. AVhen it was introduced into this country is not known, but commercial intercourse may liave brought it at any time either in its* larval or perfect stages. Dr. Loew, in an article in Silliman's Journal of Science, in 1864, mentions it in a list of species of flies known to be common to Europe and America. Of these, a number are believed to have first made their appearance ^\. ^^ •,! ^ 1 1 11 .. t Fig. 6.— The cluster fly, Polle- on the Facinc coast and gradually to have nia rudis. (After Macquart.) worked their way to the Atlantic States. Presuming the ]\ rudis to 310 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum have been one of these, it would account for the absence of any early- notice of its peculiar habits in hibernation that would naturally have attracted observation to it. What the Fly Is. The fly has been sent to me on several occasions during late years, with inquiry if it was the common house-fly, and telling of its abund- ance or strange conduct that drew attention to it. While belonging to the same family with Musca domestica, viz., the Miiscidd', and to the ordinary observer bearing a general resemblance to it in size and appearance, a comparison of the two would show marked difi^erences between them. P. rudis may be recognized by its sluggish movements when on or about the ^ * windows, as if })artialty stupefied; a some- FiG. 7. — The cluster tiy, Pollenia i.i • -i -nr j u- -j. RUDIS. (Original) what larger size than J/, domestica; its black thorax (in fresh examples) covered with rather closely ajjpressed tawny-colored hairs, sometimes inclining to a green shade; its grayish abdomen marked above with two black quadrate spots on each segment, and a black edging to the segment; and its black legs. See fig. 7. So little was known of the insects of our country fifty years ago that it is not surprising that among the manuscript material left by Dr. Harris, there should be found descriptions of the two above-named species, under the names of Musca harpyia and Musca famillaris, — the former since recognized as the common house-fly, and the latter the cluster fly. When with progress in entomology it was found necessary to sub- divide the old genera of Liniifeus, Fabricius, etc., the genus of Pollenia (suggested by the pollen of flowers) was founded by R. Desvoidy in 1830 for those Muscids having, among other features, the thorax cov- ered with a down-like clothing, classing them as '■^ Muscidm tomentosoi.'''' P. rudis was named as the type of the genus, which included about twenty European species. Of North American si:)ecies, Osten Sacken (1878) has named but one other Palleiiia, P. vespillo, occurring in Nova Scotia. Its Common Name. The popular name of the " cluster fly " has been given to this insect in consideration of its habit of leaving the flowers, fruits, branches or trees, walls, etc., upon which it is often to be seen during the summer months, and entering dwelling-houses in the autumn, for hibernation, where it gathers at times in large clusters on the walls and ceilings, and especially in the corners that they form. Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 311 What Has Been Written of Its Habits. Not liaving at hand the writings of Desvoidy, Meigen, and other European entomologists who have written of tliis insect, I am not able to state what has been narrated by them of its habits. Our own literature relating to it is quite limited. A note of two pages on " Cluster Flies " is contained in the Pi-oceed- ings of the U. iS. National Museum for 1883, vol. v, by W. H. Dall, based on specimens of the insect received from the vicinity of Geneva, N. Y., where it was reported as a great nuisance in the country houses. They were said to have first appeared in that locality about thirty years before. In the meantime they had increased until they had become a serious annoyance to housekeepers, as they intruded into places where flies do not ordinarily take up their abode, as "' in beds, in pillow-slips, under table covers, behind pictures, in wardrobes, nestled in bonnets and hats, under the edge of carpets," and in many other unusual and unexpected places. A window-casing removed, disclosed " a solid line of them from top to bottom." Their preference seemed to be for a clean, dark chamber seldom used, where the}'^ were wont to gather in large clusters about the ceilings. It is also stated of them that they sometimes suspend themselves from the cornice of a room in large clusters like swarming bees, which could be brushed bodily into a vessel of boiling water: this statement, however, we can not vouch for, and it needs verification. To Professor Dall's notice. Professor Riley has contributed about all of the scientific knowledge we have of the fly, including the several names under which it has been known during the last hundred years, together with some additional notes of its habits. A note by Professor Riley on " The Cluster Fly," in the American Naturalist, loc. cit., may also be consulted. Mr, B. P. Maun has recorded in Pst/c/te, for August, 1882, its occurrence in Maine, where the flies are reported as having the habit of burrowing into homespun yarn and the goods of loose texture made therefrom, to feed, as was supposed, on the greasy matter that remamed in them. They were thought, also, to cut the threads. Although the fl}^ appears to have obtained a wide distribution in this country, the above are the only notices that I find of attention liaving been drawn to its habits of congregating in houses in large companies. I am able to add two other instances of the kind, with the probability of a third. The Fly Observed in St. Lawrence County, N. Y. In a visit made to Hammond, St. Lawrence Co., during the first week of October, 1883, for observations on a remarkable occurrence of 312 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum tlie chiiicli-biig, large clusters of the Hy were seen in the corners of the walls and ceiling of a second floor bedroom of the farm house that I occupied. Tliey were in irregular black masses, each consisting of several hundreds of indiA'iduals. A few were found to have hidden away within the bedding. The weather at the time was quite cold, and frosts ])revailed during the nights. A Pest in a House at Palenville, N. Y. Last spring, about the middle of April, a lady brought to me examples of flies taken in her house at Palenville, Greene Co., N. Y., Avhere they were abounding in most disagreeable numbers. They were found in every room, and all her ett'orts to destroy or eject them had been f I'uitless. They were recognized as the cluster fly, and pyrethrum pOAvder was i-ecommended for killing them. The poAvder was used after the manner dii-ected, and proved entirely effective. Dustpanfuls, as I was afterwards informed, of their dead bodies were swept up and burned. Another Spring Appearance of the Fly. A number of years ago — somewhere about 1875 — when residing in Schenectady, N. Y., upon returning from church one morning, the Aviudows of a ground-Hoor front room Avith a sunny exposure, Avere found to be so thickly dotted Avith Hies as to arrest the attention of passers-by. They were ejected by brushing from the panes as speedily as possible, without examination; but recalling their features and movements, it is hardh'^ possible that they could have been any other species than this Pollen ia. At that time it Avas unknown to us by name. Its Entrance in Dwellings and Departure. It would appear, from this and the preceding account, to be the habit of the tiy, to emerge in company from their winter retreat on some Avarm day in early spring, unlike their method of entering in the autumn, Avhen they steal in singly, one by one, even Avith closed Avindows and doors, and during successive weeks or months. Since first obserA'ing the fl}', a fcAV years ago, it has been a regular visitant to my office on the fourth floor of the Capitol. It does not collect in clusters, but each year in October and November, individuals to the number, perhaps, of from thirty to fifty may be seen resting on, or sloAvly Avalking over, the loAver portion of the Avindow frame or pane. Several specimens in the State Collection bear the late date of Decem- ber 3d. Referring to my notes of the present year, I find: " September 29th, a number of Pollenia rudis on the windoAv of my office." A few indiA'iduals had been seen some daA's earlier. ^ NiMTH Heport of ruE State Entomologist 313 Other Species that Hibernate Within Doors. There are a numl)erof other Diptera that avail themselves of the shelter aud comfort of our thvellings for their protection and repose during the months of autumn and winter. A German author, as quoted bv Riley, records the swarming of two other species of Pollenia, viz., P. atramen- taria and P. vespillo, in the same building for several successive years. Mr. B. P. Mann {loc cit.) has written: "I remember that during one or two ja'ars, at a certain season, which, as far as my recollection serves me, was in April, T noticed numerous specimens of Microclo)i globosus, a syrphid fly, issue from a nail -hole in a j)lastered wall of an apartment in a dwelling house, as though the flies had passed the winter within the walls of the house." Tlie many interesting features attending the in-door liibernation of one of the Oscinidu — Cldorojts pi'nlificu of Osten Sacken, have been presented at considerable length in my Fourth and Seventh Reports. This species, however, has not yet become a common nuisance, dis- agreeable as it may be to the inmates of the house that it selects for its annual winter abode, as we know of its occurrence in onlj" three localities in the United States. Baron Osten Sacken has kindly contributed to the Fourth Report above referred to (page 72) several notices of assemblages of one or more species of Chloro2)s (they were not authoritively determined) within occupied buildings in Europe, for hibernation: In one instance it Avas estimated that eighteen millions of one species had gathered, in Sep- tember, on the ceiling of a botanical conservatory in Warsaw. It is (|uite probable that numbers of the common house-fly (females) pass the winter within the houses that they have been previously occupying, hidden away within crevices about the windows, but it is not recorded that they ever assemble in companies at such times, either for warmth or from social instinct. Early Stages of Pollenia rudis. It is not known that the early stages of this insect have been observed in this country,' or minutely anywhere. R. Desvoid}^ has given the general statement of the European PoUenias, that their eggs are laid in decomposing animal and vegetable matter. According to Macquart, their larvtv develop in the manure pile and cow droppings — "sans le ferrier et les bouzes.'" Description of the Fly. The description of this tiy, left in MS. by Dr. Harris under the name of Masca familiar is, as previously referred to, is as follows: Head somewhat prominent in front, of a dirty yellow or tawny color with a silky lustre, aiul distinct black bristles; eyes in the male conni- 314 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum vent above, in the female distant, with an interposed, oblong, black spot, furcate above and below, antennre blackish, with the articulations piceous or ferruginous. Thorax black, covered with a close, dirty yel- low or fulvous, coarse pubescence, with remote, curved, black bristles. Wings at the articulations and extreme base, ferruginous. Winglets and poisers white. Legs rusty black, with black hairs. Abdomen with distant, curved, black bristles, in both ibexes cinereous, with a silky lustre, each segment with two quadrate black spots, and widely edged with black, varying in situation and degree, according to the incidence of the light. This species, not uncommon in houses in summer, nearly disappears when the more abundant 3f. harpyia \doinesticci\ appears. Remedies. Whenever this fly intrudes in such number as to render its destruc- tion desirable, this can readily be accomplished by the use of pyrethrum. If they are gathered in clusters, the insecticide vciS^y be conveniently thrown upon them with a powder bellows. Should they be scattered thi'oughout the room, the powder may be distributed through the atmosphere of the apartment, first closing the windows and doors, and driving up the flies that they may l)e bi-ought more directly under its influence. That the pyrethrum is effective against these flies, notwithstanding a statement that has been made to the contrarj^ is shown from the note received from my Palenville correspondent, to whom its use in her emergency had been recommendtd: " I send my kindest thanks for the advice which has cleared m}^ house of its army of flies. I used the pyrethrum with bellows, and send you a trophy of its success. We swept up dustpanfuls of them, and are now entirely free from their anjioying presence." Killed by a Fungus. Mr. C. L. Marlatt, of the Entomological Division, U. S. Dept. Agri- culture, at Washington, in recording, in Insect I^ife {loc. eit.) an extra- ordinary mortality among flies observed by him on the grounds of the Agricultural Department, in the autumn of 1891, sta1:es, that among the large number of dead flies that were thickly covering the under- side of the leaves and were fastened by a fungus growth — often as many as eight or ten flies on a single leaf — most of them were Pol- lenia rudis. The fungus was not, as was at first supposed, the com- mon fungus of the house-fly, viz., Emjyusa niusca', which is not uncommon in houses on windows, etc., during the late summer and early autumn, but was determined as a species recently described by Dr. R. ihaxter, as Empusa Americana,- which, so far as known, occurs only out-doors, on vegetation, etc. Ninth Eeport of the State E.stomologist 315 Murgantia histrionica fllahn.). The Harlequin Cahbage-hug. (Ord. Hbmiptera: Subord. Heteroptera: Fam. Pentatomid.e.) A correspondent from New Jei'sey sends examples of insects which are for the first time injuring his cabbages that liave been put out for seed (not noticed on others). They were recognized as the insect above named, upon which an article giving description, life- history, habits, and other details relating to it, together with the accompanying illustration, is con- tained in my First Report. The steady progress northward y of this cabbage pest is of interest Fig. 8.— The Harlequin cabbage-bue:. JIur- ^ , ^ ^ i • . i . GANTIA histrionica: ctancU), the larva ami pupa, not only tO entOmolOglStS, DUt enlarged: c. the eggs, natural size; d, side view i.- i i ^ i,i of the eggs showing the bands; e. end view of particularly tO Cabbage groWCrS- same, showing the lid for the escape of the larva; • -vt -tr i i i i. a. /.the adult insect; j?, the same, with expanded m -Mew 1 Ork and Clsewnere UOt wings. (From Kiley.) - j i? ^i ^i far removed from the northern boundary of its present operations. From Texas, Avhere it was first observed about twenty-five years ago as severely injuring the cabbage crop, it has been slowly and steadily extending eastward and northward, with an annual progression that within a few years will, in all probability, carry it into and over New York and the New England States, and other States lying in the same parallels of latitude. It was operating in Southern California several years ago. It had previously been reported from Delaware, in the latitude of the southern line of Pennsylvania, but this is the first instance, to ni}^ knowledge, of its recognition in New Jersey, and therefore worthy of special note. As Professor Smith has not included the species in his recent " Catalogue of the Insects of New Jersey,''^ published in 1890, it cer- tainly has not as yet become common or notably injurious to cabbage culture in the State. Woodbury, whence the insects came, is in the southwestern portion of the State, a few miles south of Philadelphia. The date at whicli they were received leaves in doubt whether they were hibernated individuals, or if they were matured forms of the first spring brood (other broods follow through the summer). In the warmerj^cliraate of Texas, eggs are deposited as early as the last of February. The development of the insect is remarkably rapid, for under favorable conditions the period from the deposit of the eggs to the appearance of the mature form may be less than three weeks. 316 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum MemecUes. — So destructive to cabbage and so difficult to combat is this insect, that its advance northward into territory yet unoccupied by it should be resisted by everj' means that can be etHciently employed, and by hand-picking when every other remedy seems to fail. The arsenites are powerless against it, as it belongs to the suc- torial class Avhich feed through a beak and not with biting jaws. Experiments that I have made with pyrethrum and hellebore have shown but transitory effects, and fail to kill. Kerosene emulsion would prob- ably prove equalh' valueless. In my First Report, before cited, the following recommendations were made, as the best methods known for attacking it: 1. Sprinkling with hot water of as high a temperature as the plants will bear. '1. Trapping with leaves plucked from the plants and spread on the ground, beneath which the bugs will retire on cold nights, and where they may be found in the morning and killed. 3. Burning the waste leaves, stalks, and weeds in the autumn, in which many of the adult insects pass the winter. 4. Destroying the first brood in the earl\^ spring by crushing the eggs. These may easily be found on the leaves, as they are conspicuous from their beautiful orna- mentation, being white, tinged with green apically, surrounded by two sharply defined black bands of which the upper one is the broader, and having the apex bordered upon its depressed lid \\\X\\ a black crescent. The eggs are placed on end on the leaves fastened to one another, and often arranged in two rows of "six each. With this description of the eggs, they can be easily recognized, and not mistaken for any others. 5. The hibernating bugs, when first resorting to the plants for ovipo- sition, should be picked off by hand, or if too abundant for this, which they seldom are at this time, as many that go into winter quarters fail to survive its rigors and the enemies to which they are exposed, they maj"" be knocked off the plants with a stick into a pan of water and kerosene. — {Goiintry Gentleman of June 9, 189-2.) A new reniedij. — Mr. H. E. Weed, Entomologist of the Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station, premising that '* there is but one efficient remedy for this insect, Avhich is to destroy the brood which lives over winter" before their oviposition, has proposed a method which he has found successful in controlling "by far the worst cabbage pest of the South." It certainly gives promise of being the most simple and effective method yet discovex'ed. Mr. Weed reconmiends that a row of mustai'd or radish plants be run on the sides or through the middle of the cabbage patch or field, and as the Murgantia Avill be drawn to these in preference to the cabbage, — when they have collected thereon, they may be killed by the application of kerosene. It does Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 317 not appear from Mr. Weed's report that the liibernating individuals were killed by this method. Ife states: Our present crop of cabbage was put into the field early in March,, and at the same time a row of radishes was planted through tlie middle of the patch. The radishes were Avell grown by the time the second brood of bugs [the first spring broodj had hatclied, and nearly all the insects found their way to the radishes, where they were killed by spraying with kerosene. At this date, June 15, liardly a single l)ug is to be found in this patch, while cabbage planted in otlier parts of the grounds are badly infested. {Bulletin. JSfo. 21 of the Mississippi Af/ricultural Experiment Station, June, 1892.) Unless there should be no survivors of the radish feeders which might transmit, through heredity, an especial fondness for that plant to their successors, it would seem to be desirable that only mustai'd, if equally attractive, should be used as a bait. We have no knowledge that M. histrionica has been reported as a radish pest, although long known to feed on it and on other Crucifera', but another member of the genus, probably 31. munda Stal, has recently appeared in that role, in California {Insect Life, iv, 1891, p. S3). Psylla pyricola (Foerster). The Tear- Tree Fsf/lla. (Ord. Hemiptera : Subord. Homoptera : Fam. Fsyllid-e.) Foerster : in Verhandl. d. naturh. ver. d, preuss. Rheinlande, v. 1848, p. 77. Harris: Treat. Ins. New Engl., 1852, pp. 301-204; Ins. Inj. Veg., 1863, pp. 231-234 (early observations, habits, description, etc.). Fitch : in Trans. N. Y. St. Agricul. See, xvi, 1856, p. 853; 3d-5th Repts. Ins. N. Y., 1859, p. 35 (brief mention). Uhler : in Rept. Coiumis. Patents for 1860. 1861, p. 314 (discovered in U. S.). Packard : Guide Study Ins., 1869, p. 53 (mention) : Entomol. Begin., 1888, p. 83 (mention). Walsh-Riley : in Amer. Entomol., i. 1869, p. 235 (mention, in Eastern States). LeBaron : 2d Rept. Ins. 111., 1872, pp. 134-136, figures (injuries in Illinois). Glover : in Rept. Comniis. Agr. for 1876. 1877, pp. 33, 34, fig. 36 (description, localities, etc.). Thomas : in 7th Rept. Ins. III., 1878, p. 73, fig. 12 (mention); in 8th Rept. do., 1879, p. ] 3, fig. 3, pp. 16-17 (general account, remedies, etc.). Barnard : in Proc, Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., xxviii, 1880, pp. 478-486, plate (as P. piirisuga). AsHMEAD : in Canad. Entomol., xiii, 1881, p. 320 (questions KoUar's account of habits). Riley : in Proc. Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., xxxii, 1884, p. 319 (mention); in Proc. Biolog. Soc. Wash., 1884, p. 69 (referred to x^yricolaoi Foerster); in Insect Life, v, 1892, p. 103 (synonym). LOEW : in Neue Beitriige, zur Kenntniss der Psylliden-Verh. Wien Zool.-Bot. . Gesell., xxxvi, 1886, p. 154. COMSTOCK : Introduc. Entomol., 1888, p. 171 (brief reference). Saunders : Ins. Inj. Fruits, 1889, pp. 145, 146, figs. 151, 152. 318 IfORTY-sixiH Report on the State Museum LlNTNER: in Count. Gent., Ivi, 1891, pp. 317, 374, 637; in Canad. Entomol., xxiii, 1891, p, 230 (in Hudson river valley); in Science, xix, 1893, p. 343; 8th Kept. Ins. N. Y., 1893, p. 219. Riley-Howard : in Insect Life, iv, 1891, pp. 127-9 (descriiJtion and habits from Loew), p. 225 (occurrence in New York); id., v, 1893, p. 200 (is undoubt- edly P. pyricola of Foerster), pp. 226-280 (observations of Mr. SUnger- land, and dimorphism). Powell : in Orange County Farmer, May 21, 1891 (brief notice). Fisher : in New Engl. Homestead, Dec. 5, 1891; in Bull. No. 17, Hatch Agr. Exp. St., 1892, p. 24 (habits and remedy). LODEMAN : in Garden and Forest, v, 1892, p. 285 (brief notice of habits, etc.). Slingerland : in Count. Gent., Ivii, 1892, p. 629; in Canad. Entomol., xxiv, 1893, p. 207 (injuries, broods, remedy); in Insect Life, v, 1892, pp. 100-103 (description, transformations, remedies, etc.); Bull. 14, Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. St., Oct., 1892, pp. 159-186, 7 figs, (full account). Smith : in Canad. Entomol., xxiv, 1892, p. 207 (copper and London purple spraying for it); Insect Life, vi, 1893, p. 192 (injuries and spread in New Jersey). Until within a few years the pear tree has been remarkably free from insect attack — the amount of injury from such source being probably less than live per cent of that to which the apple tree has been subjected. Recently two pests have forced themselves upon the notice of pear- growers, which have already inflicted serious losses, and threaten, unless arrested, greatly to interfere with the cultivation of this most excellent and prized fruit. Of these, the pear nudge, Dij^losis p^rivora (noticed in the preceding Report), which was introduced in this country about the year 1880, has not become broadly distributed, and has not occa- sioned much trouble except in western Connecticut and in portions of the Hudson river valle3^ The pear-tree Psylla is also an introduced insect, which has been with us for a number of years — how long, is not known, but long enough to have carried it into some of our western States. It has, at times, multiplied exceed- ingly in particular localities and become very destructive, as notably in the summer of 1891, in the Hudson river valley, in association with the pear midge. Fortunately, however, after continuing its injuries for a few years, its ex- cessive multipli- cation seems to operate as a check to its further increase, and to consign it for another term of years to insignifi- cance in numbers and comparative , , Fig. 10.— Wings of the pear tree Psylla; c, iiarmleSSneSS. clavus; c. s., claval suture; s, stigma. Fig. 9.— The pear-tree Psylla, Psylla pyri- cola, male. Ninth Repor'i of the S'iate Entomologist 319 Through llie kindness of Mr. M. V. Slingerland, of the Cornell University, Ithaca, X, Y., we are enabled to present the excellent figures of the insect in its immature and perfect stages which illus- trate this notice. Figure 9 represents the insect in Fig. 11— Head of the pear-tree Tsylla: n, front view; b, ■ „_f„„4- ^ino-pd stao-p- antenna greatly enlarged; c, frontal cones; o, ocelli. 11-= perxecb wiugeu »id.ge;, in Figure 10 the venation and markings of the wings are shown, greatly- enlarged; Figure 11 gives enlargements of the head and antennse, show- ing the two characteristic bristles at the tip of the antenna. The Family Psyllidae. The family to which this species belongs is nearl}- related to the Aphides {Ap/iklkhi), or plant-lice, coming next to it among the Homoptera in classification, but are stouter forms and of firmer texture. In general appearance the winged insects look like miniature Cicadas. Their head is broad, short, generally triangular \n front, where it is cleft or bilobed with the lobes projecting conically forward; the eyes are large and project from the sides, with three simple eyes or ocelli in a triangle on top of the head; the antennae are rather long, slender, and thread-like, usually ten-jointed and terminate in two small bristles — a distinguishing characteristic of the family; the beak is short, three- jointed and arises from between the- fore-legs, and is fitted with a groove for securing it. The wings are sub-leatherj^ or transparent, large, the front pair with the midrib three-branched, and these again bifurcating (see Figure 10); in repose they are placed over the abdomen in a steep roof; the hind wings have a few longitudinal and delicate veins. The abdomen of the female ends in a short conical ovipositor. The legs are fitted for leaping, having the thighs (femora) thick and the hindmost shanks (tibije) armed with spines; the feet (tarsi) are two-jointed. In their ability to leap, as also in their feeding habits, they resemble the smaller leaf -hoppers of the grapevine and rose. The larvw have a broad head, flat body, rounded abdomen, with the antennae at first one- jointed. Some species are covered with a cot- tony secretion, or they may be naked, or covered with a honey-dew as in the pear-tree Psylla. The pupre are distinguishable by their stouter forms and the projecting wing-pads on their sides. Earliest Notice of the Pear Psylla in the United States, According to Dr. Harris, this insect was observed by Dr. Ovid Plumb, of Salisbury, Conn., "in the spring of 1833, on some imported pear 320 FoRTY-srxTH Report on the State Museum trees wliich had been set the year before; Tliese trees, in the autumn after they were planted, wore an unliealthy aspect, and had patches of a blackish rust upon their branches. During the second summer, the trees died ; and other trees on which this same rusty matter was found, proved to be infested with the same insects," Whether the insect had appeared in the United States prior to this is not definitely known, yet there is reason to believe that it may have been operating in the State of New York as early as in 1824, if not in the preceding century. In an article on "Pear-Tree Blight" by Dr. J. J. Thomas, in the Cultivator for June, 1850, vii, p. 204, it is stated that Mr. E. J, Genet had written expressing his belief that the disorder was caused by an insect observed by him, and operating in the following manner: At a little before midsummer, in the absence of dew for several nights, liquid drops could be seen falling from a pear tree, which was subsequently found to proceed from minute aphides thickly covering the shoots or branches, and which had at iirst escaped notice from the indentity of their, color with that of the pear bark. They continued for about ten daj^s, and then disappeared. The varnish which these insects exuded was legarded as poisonous to the tree, Mr. Genet states that the same disorder had appeared on the banks of the Hudson in 1780-1793, and in 1802-1807. As these attacks may not have been seen by the writer, it is not improbable that they were the true "pear blight." "In 1824," Mr. Genet writes (probably from personal observation), "the same disorder prevailed, and lasted four years. In 1846 we were once more suffering from the same cause, and our pear trees are still prostrated by its fatal attacks. This disease has been called by some 'fire-blight.' One writer saj's it is produced by the Aphis lunata, a small insect covered by fine, white wool, but the insect which came under mj observation is very different in every char- acteristic — so small as to escape observation in the first stage, and so similar to a fly at maturity as to mislead an inattentive observer." As the insect, from characters given, could not have been the common and well-known apple-tree aphis, there can hardly be a doubt of its having been the pear-tree Psylla. Its introduction may easily have occurred as early as 1824, as pear-trees had been imported by nursery- men for thirty years pi-ior to that date.* Dr. Harris' attention was first drawn to the Psylla in 1848 by Dr. Plumb, through a communication published in the American A(/9'ictd- * See article on " Early Pear Importations" in the Country Gentleman for December 1, 1892 page 907, where importation of pear-trees as early as in 1794 is recorded, and of other fruit-trees in the first decade of the present centm-y, which, doubtless, "would easily be the means of mporting such noxious insects as infested them." Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 321 turist for Januar}', 1849, ^age 29. In this Dr. Plumb states that he had lost several hundred young pear-trees between the years 1834 and 1838. It was not from the pear blight, which first shows itself in the leaves. But in this attack the bark turns black, sometimes commenc- ing in July, more often in August, and then again not until September. It had not troubled him since 1838 until the present ^1848), when he believed that he had found the cause of the trouble in an insect which he observed on the affected trees in September, although they might have been there earlier. None were seen on, the trees not affected. They looked to him like aphides, and jumped like fleas. Specimens were taken from his trees about the middle of November, and sent to> Dr. Harris. From Dr. Harris' reply, jiublished with the above, we learn that the specimens received were in the winged state, both males and females. From their injured condition and changed colors in drying, he was unable to name the species, but thought it probable that they were the Psylla pyri of Europe. Their habits and transformation not unlikely would be found to be similar to those given by European writers; these are quoted by Dr. Harris, including the remedies recommended by Kollar, substantially as given in the "Insects of New England" and later editions of the same. The letter of reply concludes with the following description of the specimens received from Dr. Plumb: Description by Dr. Harris of the Psylla. The insects were of a brownish color, with transparent wings, marked by a few dark veins. Each measured one-tenth of an inch or rather more, from the forehead to the tips of the closed wings. The front of the head is notched in the middle. The eyes are large and pi'ominent, and with the thorax resemble somewhat in form those of our common cicada. The antennae are longer than the body, slender, or threadlike, and are tipp d at the end with two little bristles. The body of the female is pointed at the end, and is more of a reddish hue than that of the male. In 1857, Dr. Harris saw the living insects on the trees at Salisbury. Of these he has written : *" On the 23d of July, I saw these insects on the trees, some already provided with wings, and others advancing toward maturity. The young ones [pupae] were of a dull orange-yellow color. They were short, and were obtuse behind, and had little wing- scales on the sides of their bodies [omitting what is given above of the winged forms]; the head and thorax were brownish-orange, and the hind body greenish. Their four ample wings were * * * * colorless ***** rpj^g European, P. pyri, is said to vary in * Insects of Sew England, 1852. p. 203. Insects Injurious to Vegetation, 18b2, p. 232 1893. 41 322 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum color at different ages, and in different seasons of the year, being of a dull crimson color, shaded with black in the spring, when it comes forth to lay its eggs. Not having seen any of our pear-tree PsyUce in their spring dres-", I can not say whether they agree with those of Europe in being of the same crimson color at this season of the year." The Pyslla Referred to P. pyricola. In the bibliograph}'^ herewith given, all of our earlier writers have accepted it as probably identical with the Psylla jyyri of Europe, with the sole exception of its description and illustration by Dr. Barnard under the name of P. pyrisuga. Dr. Riley, I believe, was the first to detect specific characters separating it from that species, and to refer it to P. pyricola — one of the three closely allied species which attack and injure the pear tree in Europe, of which, according to Dr. Loew, '•'P. pyrisuga Foerster is found throughout Central Europe in large numbers annually, and is a great pest; P. pyrl Linn, is comparatively rare, appearing in small colonies, but is widely distributed; P. pyricola Foerster occurs in some localities in large numbers, particularly infesting dwarf pears, and often occasions considerable damage."* In his reference to P. pyricola Dr. Riley states: " This is the Pear- tree Psylla of our Northern and Western States, and its reference to Foerster's species is made after comparisons with European specimens received from Meyer-Dur and Lichtenstein."f The identity of our species with any of the Euroj;ean has been questi jned by some of our writers, but for the present, at least, we must accept Dr. Riley as authority, he having recently, in reply to inquiry made, written me even more explicitly than quoted above: " The common pear-tree Psylla of New York and Massachusetts is unquestionably P. pyricola Foerst., and agrees perfectly with European specimens sent me by Dr. Loew." Its Recent Multiplication in the Hudson River Valley. Like many other of our insect pests, the Pear-tree Psylla, from time to time, and for a longer or shorter term of years, is favored with condi- tions peculiarly fitted to its increase, which are again followed by cor- responding periods of almost entire exemption from its presence. Thus, according to Dr. Plumb, it was not noticeably present in his orchards for the ten years folio win i^ the year 1838, i^reyious to which it had annually been very destructive. * From an abstract by Riley-Howard in Insect Life, iv, 1891, p. 127, from Dr. Loew, loc. cit. + Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, ii, 1884, p. 69. Ninth Report of tue State Entomologist 323 Up to the year 1891, the insect was known to me only by name. In the spring of that year I first made its acquaintance, after the manner related below in the Coxintry Gentleman, of April 16th. Eds. Country Gextlemax. — A gentleman has sent to me fi'ora Athens, N. Y., a package of pear twigs taken from his orchard, which are quite blackened with what he calls "honeydew." Many other orchards in Greene county are affected in the same manner. Mention was made of this peculiar appearance at the Farmers' Institute recently held at Coxsackie [March 20th]. As it was thought that it might pos- sibh' have some connection with the fungus disease known as " apple- scab," Avhich occurs upon the fruit and leaves and also on the twigs of the apple and the pear, infested twigs have been, by request, sent to Albany for examination. The blackening is apparently of the same kind as that which we find upon hop leaves, elm leaves and other foliage which have been infested with plant-lice, the excretion from which, known as " honey- dew," has collected upon the upper surface of the haves — at first of a limpid appearance, but in drj'ing and with age becoming blackened. Subsequently a fungus growth usually occurs on the surface of the hone^'-dew and increases the blackness. The fungus is present in the €xamples received, as detected by State Botanist Peck, but as it is of a harmless kind, being superficial only and not penetrating the bark, neither it nor the dried honey-dew on which it rests can be of any par- ticular injury to the trees. It is desirable, however, that the cause of the honey-dew should be removed. The insect that excretes so large a quantity can not be other- wise than injurious. I know of no aphis Tplaut-louse) that infe^ts the pear in sufiicient numbers to produce such a deposit. It is probable that examination during the month of May w'ill show the presence, in association wnth fresh honey-dew of an allied insect, known as the pear- tree Psylla [Psylla 2yyri), which is known in some localities to infest the twigs of the pear in large numbers, and, by sucking the sap, to occasion a large flow of the honey-dew. It has not been observed in this vicinity, but watch will be kept for it and, if discovered in its nefarious work, recommendation will be made of the best w^ay to meet it.* *In a communication made to the CorxTRY Gentleman of May 7th, 1891, and copied in my Eighth Report on the Insects of New York, some larvae on apple twigs, received from Wayne coimty, in the western part of New York, were Identified by me as Psylla pyri. They were thought to be identical with larva; that had been sent to me a few days earlier, on apple blos- som buds, from Ghent, Columbi i county, N. Y. The above identification should not hav ■» been made, or doubt should have been expressed , for, from having had only the larvas before me, it is by no means certain that they may not have belonged to some other species, as Psylla mali or Ps. pyrisuga. It is sufficiently difficult to disinguijh these Pyrus-infesting Psyllids in their final winged stage. 324 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum Early in June, in a visit made to the orchards of Mr. Cole, at Cats- kill, Greene Co., N. Y., to observe the attack of the pear midge, which had just been brought to notice (see Eighth Report Insects of New York), it was learned that the pear Psylla had been extremely abun- dant with him for the preceding four years, and had seriously aifected the bearing of his trees. That they had been very numerous was evi- dent from the appearance of some of the larger trees, the terminal branches of which looked as if they had been coated with a black paint. A few of the insects were observed at this time on the wing, but, later in the year, according to Mr. Cole, clouds of them would rise up in the air if a limb was shaken. The branches would be so covered with honey-dew as to smear the hands and sleeves of the men gathering the fruit. About the middle of June the insect was seen prosecuting its destructive work at Ghent, Columbia county, N. Y. : in the extensive orchards of Mr. G. T. Powell, larva;, pupjie, honey-dew, and the winged insects abounded. Of the latter a dozen or more could be seen at one time feeding from the foot-stalks of a leaf or young pear, extracting its sap, and, of course, producing blight. If a small tree was shaken, thousands would take wing, circle about the branches for a short time, and then agiin settle upon the leaves. A correspondent of the Rural A'ew Yorker, who visited the orchards of Mr. Powell in August, has given the following sad account of their appearance : From the beautiful apple orchards we strolled to the pear orchards, and here was a sight to make one cry. He has about three thousand pear trees, half of them in full bearing, but a pest has struck them this season, which has made the orchards a picture of desolation. Last year the pear-tree Psylla appeared, but were not numerous enough to do any appreciable damage. This season they reappeared in force, and have converted his beautiful orchards into a most distressing scene. Mr, Powell's most vigorous efforts, seconded by the wisdom of the State Entomologist, were powerless to check the ravages of this pest, though they hope another season to be more successful. Possibly the pests may not reappear another season, as they come and go mysteri- ously. But they have done their work most effectually this season, and instead of twelve hundred barrels of fine pears which he had counted on, he will barely have one hundred, {Rural New Yorker, August 29th, 1891, page 624,j Similar conditions presumably prevailed in a large number, if not in most, of the pear orchards of Greene and Columbia counties, judging from other reports that came to me. A severe attack was also reported, in June, by Professor C. H. Peck, on some young pear trees in his garden, at Menands, in Albany county. It continued through the summer into the autumn, causing consider- able damage to the foliage of the infested trees. Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 325 Distribution. As already stated, the pear-tree Psylla is known to have occurred at Salisbury, Conn., in 1833, and it was probably operating in an eastern county in New York in 1824. At the time that Dr. Harris wrote of it — in 1852 — it was known to him "in the western part of Con- necticut and Massachusetts, particularly in the valley of the Housatonic, and in the adjoining counties of Dutchess and Columbia in New York." Little is known of the extent of its eastern distribution in the New England States. Mr. T. S. Gold found it "several years ago" in West Cornwall, Conn., ten miles south-east of Salisbury, Coe Brothers first noticed it in their pear orchards at Meriden, New Haven county. Conn., ten or fifteen years ago, where it has been quite destructive in certain years. Mr. Fisher has had the opportunity of studying its habits at Fitchburg, in northern Massachusetts, nearly one hundred miles from Salisbury. That it is rather a local insect would appear from the statement that it is not known to the Messrs. Coe in any other portion of the State, and furthermore, that it has not appeared in a young pear orchard (set out in 1881), which is only a half-mile distant from their badly infested orchards. Along the Hudson river valley it has been injurious in Rensselaer, Columbia, Dutchess, Greene, and Albany counties. Its presence has not been reported in the extreme south-eastern counties of New York, nor is it known to Dr. J. B. Smith to occur in the State of New Jersey.* In Central New York, Mr.lM. V. Slingerland has been able to make valuable studies upon it at Ithaca, Tompkins county. In Western New York it must occur sparingly, if at all, for Mr. E. P. Van Duzee, who has been giving careful study to the Hemiptera for several years past, reports *' no observed injury from it," nor is he able to identify the species, as described in Dr. Loew's paper, among the seventeen species of Psyllids contained in his collection. Professor A. J. Cook does not know of its presence in Michigan. Professor F. M. Webster has found it abundant in Ohio; and Dr. LeBaron has written of its presence and injuries in lUinoit-". Its Injuries. The injuries resulting from formidable attacks of this insect are the consequence of the large amount of sap which the myriads of indi- viduals draw from the twigs, buds, leaves, leaf -stalks, and fruit-stalks of an infested tree, and eject in the form of "honey-dew," thickly coating the surface and thereby preventing the normal vital action of the leaves and bark. * It has since been observed in New Jersey by Dr. Smith. 326 FoRTT-sixTU Report on the State Museum Some of these injuries have ah-eady been referred to, as in the orchards of Mr. Powell, in Ghent, N. Y. The extensive pear orchards of Coe Brothers, at Meriden, Conn., have for several years suffered severely from it. In a letter from Mr. A. J. Coe, dated September Tth, 1891, he wrote that on his return from Europe, a few Aveeks j^revious to his writing, he found that his pear orchard had been devastated by the Psylla, and bore very little fruit. A severe attack prevailed in a pear orchard of Mr, H. S. Wright, of Ithaca, N. Y., during the season of 1891. Mr. Slingerland, who saw the orchard in November of that year, has reported of it as fol- lows: " The whole orchard appeared as though a fire had swept quickly through it, scorching the trees and blackening the trunks, large branches and the smallest twigs. Both young and old trees of dwarf and standard varieties had been attacked. Most of the trees had made little or no new growth drtring the season, and many buds were then dead." Dr. LeBaron has described severe injuries from it in the State of Illinois, in the year 1871, when young pear trees had been so badly attacked by it that " the leakage of sap from the axils of the leaves [? the honey-dew given out by the insects] had in some instances run down the branches and trunk to the ground." The frequent death of pear trees in former y< ars, from unknown causes, after a season of languishing, is now believed to have been owing to the unsuspected presence of this insect, which from its minute size may have easily been overlooked. Mr. Powell unhesitatingly charges the recent death of many of his trees to Psylla attack. Certain it is, that a continuance for several years in succession of such injuries as have been cited, must necessarily prove fatal to the trees. If not carried to this extent, — in years of abundance of the Psylla, the crop would be a failure. The leaves, covered Avith a thick coating of the honey-dew and the sap withdrawn from their foot-stalks, would cease in midsummer to perform their functions and would fall to the ground: without them, the fruit could not mature. Life-history. There was not the opportunity during the season of 1891 to make a study of the life-history of this insect, or to learn much more of it than what has been given in the preceding pages. The folloAving year,^ its abundance at Ithaca gave to Mr. Slingerland the opportunity of watching its development and habits; and in a Bulletin (No. 44) issued by the Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, under date of October, 1892, he has given to the public its entire life- history carefully Avorked out, together Avith its early history, descrip- Ni^TH Report of tee State Entomologist 327 tion and illustrations of the sevei'al stages, methods of preventing its ravag.'s, together with its bibliography and sjnionymy. "Whether or not, eggs of the pear-tree Psylla, are, in some eases at least, deposited in the autumn for hibernation, seems still an unsettled question. Mr. Sliugerland found a hibernating brood of the winged insect, in both sexes, in the month of December, hidden in crevices under loosened bark of the trunks and larger branches of trees. The females contained no mature eggs. During some warm days occurring about the 7th of April, hibernated adults were seen in copulation and a few eggs were laid. By April 18th, most of the eggs had been deposited — in crevices of the bark, in old leaf scars, and about the bases of terminal buds of the preceding year — usually singly, but sometimes in rows of eight to ten. Under a continu- ance of cold weather, the eggs did not hatch until more than a month thereafter, or May 10th to 18tb, but eggs that had been removed and subjected to the warm temperature of the Insectary, gave out their larvae in eleven days. The larvre at once resorted to feeding grounds M'hich were usually found in the axils of Fig. 12.— Pupa of the pear-tree the leaf petioles or stems of the young Psylla, do, sal view. ^^,^^^^^ into Which they thrust their short beaks and extract the sap. "The whole life-cycle of the generation studied, from the layiug of the ^gg to the appearance of the adult insect, was about one month " [in the Insectary]. During this time, five stages — " nymph stages" — of the immature insect were observed, followed by the fifth molt giving the winged adult. [If it be pre- ferred to retain a " pupal stage " for the insect, the last two of the above noted may be so regarded, in which there are eight antennal joints, Avhile the preced- ing show but three, four, and six or seven respectively, according to Mr. Slinger- land's observations.] Figures 12 and 13 represent the full-grown "nymph" or Fig. 13.- Pupa of the pear tree Psylla, pupa — the natural size indicated by the ventral view. accompanying hair-lines. 328 FoRTT-t-siXTH Report on the State Museum The mature insects made their appearance about June 15th, and com- menced to feed soon after emerging. "They appear to secrete no honey-dew." Within a week copulation ensued, and oviposition soon began. There were at least four broods during the year, at intervals of about a month. The adults of the summer broods Avere the most numerous July 2()th, August 20th, and September 25th — the last constituting the hibernating form. This last-named form varied so much from the preceding summer broods, being one-third larger and of much darker colors, that they were believed, at first, to be a different species. On careful comparison with descriptions of Psylla simulans Foerster, of Europe, it was found to present so close a resemblance as to leave scarcely a doubt that P. simulans had been described from the winter form of P. pyricola, and that the species is dimorphic, appearing in two distinct forms during the year, as some others of the Psyllida> are known to do. The P. simulans form continues to feed until the leaves fall, when it retires to its hiding places for the winter. None were observed in copulation during the autumn. For descriptions of the insect in the several stages, the paper of Mr. Slingerland may be consulted. PJggs of the Psylla. — Among the few notes made by me during the prevalence of the insect in 1891, the following occurs: Prof. C. H. Peck, brought from his garden at Menands, N. Y., on June 15th, leaves of a pear tree having numerous eggs of the Psylla on both the upper and lower sides, but rather more abundant on the lower side. Many are placed along the midrib from the base to the tip, and some on other parts of the leaf, usually beside a vein and thrust in almost out of sight between the twisted hairs clothing the surface. The hair-like thread projecting from the narrow end of the Qgg, is, in most, a little longer than the egg, but in some, twice the length. The egg is not attached by it to the leaf but by a transparent teat-like process given off from Fig. 14.— Egg of the pear near the broader end, as shown in the accompanving tree Psylla. . figure. Three eggs were seen standing close together on a leaf with the thread pointing upward, as if it were the remains of the secretion in Avhich the eggs were enveloped at their oviposition. Nearly all of the eggs are near their hatching as the inclosed larvae are seen within, separated from the shell. On one leaf there were about thirty eggs. Young larvae, apparently disclosed within a day or two, were also present. Cast pupa-cases were attached to various portions of the leaves. Professor Peck noticed the adults mating when the leaves were gathered. Ninth Eeport of the State Entomologist 329 Remedies. Recent writers upon this insect have been recommending as perhaps the best method for its destruction, that of killing the eggs in which the insect was believed to hibernate during the winter, by spraying them Avith kerosene emulsion. This was based, not on actual experi- ment, but on the known insecticidal property of kerosene and its pene- trative powers. Late experiments, however, carefully made, have given the unlooked-for result that there are insect eggs which can not be killed hj kerosene emulsion of the extreme strength with which it may safely be used on vegetation, or even by undiluted kerosene. Such are the eggs of the Psj'^lla, as has been shown by Mr. Slin- gerland in his Bulletin on the Pear-tree Psylla previously quoted. It was found by him that eggs dipped in a kerosene emulsion of full strength, and into kerosene undiluted, hatched a few days thereafter. The same result attended their immersion in spirits of turpentine, carbolic acid emulsion, whale-oil soap solution, strong potash solution, and undi- luted benzine. The vulnerable stage in this insect is when it has hatched from the egg and the larvte are distributed over the j^oung leaves and on the leaf stalks. This, in ordinary seasons, in the State of New York, would be about the middle of May. If the infested trees are at this time sprayed with kerosene emulsion, even so weak as five per cent of kerosene, it will be fatal to all the insects with which it comes in con- tact. With careful spraying very few should fail of being reached, unless they ai"e protected by a covering of honeys-dew. When the insect has passed to its winged stage, it has attained com- parative immunity in the alertness with which it takes wing and leaves the tree upon the first motion communicated to the foliage by the impact of the spraying liquid. But even so late as the month of Sep- tember, the war against the insect should not be abandoned, for multi- tudes may be destroyed, and the hibernating individuals for the following year greatly reduced. The kerosene emulsion will still be effective, but in its application, all of the ordinary sprajing-nozzles should be discarded, even the finest gauge of the Nixon nozzle, and a Vermorel used, adjusted to the delivery of the finest possible mist-like spray. With proper care the emulsion may be distributed over the entire foliage without scarce stirring a leaf and with the least possible alarm to the winged tenants. ' Of those that take wing — after circling about the tree for a while — on their return to the leaves, their bodies will in most cases come in contact with the liquid, and take up sufticient of it to cause their death. 1893 42 330 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum Chortophaga viridifasciata (De Geer). The G reen-stri/ped Locust, (Orel, Orthoptera.: Fam, Acridid.k.) Additional to Bibliography given in Second Report, Insects of New York : Tragocephala viridifasciata. Riley : in 1st Rept. U. S. Ent. Commis., 1878, p. 256 (quotes from 8th Rept. Ins. Mo.); in Cassino's Stand. Nat. Hist., 1884, p. 203, fig. 285 (range). Chimarocephala viridifasciata. Scudder: Entomolog. Notes, vi, 1878, p. 30 (collections in Florida). Chimarocephala viridifasciata. Lintner : 2d Rept. Ins. N. Y., 1885, pp. 187-198, fig. 54; in Count. Gent., Ivii, 1892, p. 286 (at Canaan Four Corners). Chortophaga viridifasciata. Fernald : Orthop. New F.ngl., 1888, p. 40, lig. 15 (the two forms). Chortophaga viridifasciata. Comstock : Introduc. Entomol., 1888, p. 98 (stridulation), p. 104 (varieties). Tragocephala viridifasciata. Weed : in 15th Rept. Ins. 111., 1889, p. 42 (early appearance in Illinois). Chortophaga viridifasciata. McNeil : in Psyche, vi. 1891, p. 62 (habits, etc.). Chortophaga viridifasciata. Blatchley : in Canad. Ent., xxiii, 1891, p. 76 (habits). Young individuals of this locust (commonly called grasshoppers) were received from Canaan Four Corners, Columbia county, N. Y., where tlie}^ had excited surprise and alarm by their having been seen in large numbers, on March ."SOth, hopping about on the snow and else- where in pastures and meadows having a warm southerly exposure. Identification of the Species. A notice of this occurrence was published in the Country Gentleiaan of April 14th, 1892, in which they were recognized as the young of "the green-striped locust," which had been described by Dr. Harris in his "Insects of New England" as Locusta {Tragocephala) viridifasciata. In my Second Report {loc. cit.) an account is given of this insect under the generic name t)f Chimarocephala — a name proposed b}'- Mr. Scudder, in 1876 (meaning in the Greek, goat-headed) to replace the preoccupied one of Tragocephala. It has since been referred to the genus Chortophaga \\j Saussure, and this designation appeal's to have been accepted by our later scientific writers. It hardl}'^ seems worth the while, however, to attempt to follow the frequent generic alterations to which many of our insects are subjected. Its Frequent Winter Appearance. This particular species of locust seems, in its young stage, to respond more quickly to the influence of warmth in emerging from its winter retreat than any other of the species which, like it, hibernate in their larval stage, as Arphia sulphurea (Fabr.), Ilippiscus tuberculatus Pal. de Beauv, species of Tetfi.i', et cet. Its proneness to premature appear- XlXTH JxEPOET OF THE StATE E^T0M0L0OIST 331 ance has been remarked upon by several writers. Dr. Riley having- received examples of it in Missouri, which were observed hopping^ about during mild weather in midwinter, has written of it: "It becomes active whenever the weather is mild. It is sometimes found in winter in the early larva stages, but more often in the pupa state."* Dr. Thomas has stated : " The larvoe and the pupas and even the perfect insects are occasionally observed during the Avarm days in winter."f Mr. Weed {loc. <:it.) saw them in Peoria couuty, Illinois, in the month of March, 1886, "hopping. around on the grass, although the ground in many parts of the field Avas covered with snow." Mr. Blatchley records them as " frequenting dry open woods and roadsides, where the half-grown young can be seen jumping vigorously about in any warm sunny day in winter." In my Second Report {loc. cit.) record is made of their occurrence in several localities in the State of New York during the winter of 1882, in the month of February, in immense numbers — millions as stated by some observers — jumping about on the surface of the snow with all the life and activity of midsummer. That a temperature of about fifty degrees above zero, Fahr., will usually bring out the insect from its winter quarters, may be inferred from the following data: Of the thermometrical conditions attendant on the February (1882) occurrences in the State of New York, I have written : " From an average temperature for the several preceding weeks of +27° Pahr., it suddenly changed to a mean temperature (of one week) of 40"^, reaching at tlie highest, 56^." Almost the same condi- tions seem to have attended the appearance at Canaan Four Corners above reported: Thus, the average temperature of the week preceding March 25th, as given in the " Report of the New York Meteorological Bureau" for the month of March, for Albany, the nearest reporting station to Canaan Four Corners, w^as +28^°; that for the week following (25th to 31st), 40°; the highest temperature observed, 57°, on the 26th. The Two Forms of the Insect. A description of C. viricUfasciata has been given in the Second Report on the Insects of New York. Figure 15 represents the full-grown insect, and its larva in form and size as usually j^^^^?!^ seen during the winter. The dimorphic forms un- " a- der which it appears are quite marked. Thevhave Fig. 15.— The green-striped locust. Chortophaga viRiDiFAS^ ^ " ciATA, yv^ung and adult. been thought by some * Eighth Report on the Insects of Missouri, lSr6, page 149. + Eighth Report on the Insects of Illinois, 18S0, page ICG. 332 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum to be sexual features and by others as seasonal varieties. " In one, the typical form, the head, thorax, and femora are green, and there is a broad green stripe on each wing-cover, extending from the horn to beyond the middle: this often includes two dusky spots on the edge. The second variety differs so much that it was described by Harris as a distinct species under the specific name, infuscata. In this form the ground color is dusky brown. Intergrades occur in which the head and thorax are of a reddish velvety brown. Length of male to end of abdomen, 20 mm. (.8 inch); to tip of wings, 25 mm. (1 inch). Length of female to tip of wings, about 30 mm. (1.4 inch)." (Comstock.) Transformation, etc. This species has been shown from reliable data to be double-brooded, unlike our common red-legged locust {3felanoplus Jemitr-ruhrimi), the Rocky Mountain locust {Melanojjlus spretus*), the lesser locust, Melan- oplus atlanis, and most of the other Acrididm, of which there is but one brood annually. It is to this fact in its life-history that its not infrequent appearance in winter or early spring may be ascribed. The insects received from Columbia county are immature, being in their early stages of larvse and pupte — the latter distinguishable by their somewhat larger size (over half an inch) and possession of wing- pads or wing sheaths containing the future wings. They are from the egg-pods that were deposited in holes made in the ground by the ovi- positor of the females last autumn. The larvae hatching from the eggs two or three weeks thereafter, fed for awhile, until they had attained the size that they now present, when the coming of cold weather drove them to shelter for the winter in rubbish, beneath leaves, and in stone walls. Here they remained in an inactive, lethargic state, until unusu- ally warm weather toward the last of March awakened them from their sleep and enticed them abroad. The insect becomes fully matured, and takes its place among the earliest harbingers of spring, ordinarily toward the latter part of May, It has been seen by Mr. McNeil for the first, on the 22d of April, and he has pleasantly written of it : " This species is the first of its order to reach maturity in the early spring, and the noise of the male [it has remarkable stridulating powers] is the beginning of the grasshoj^per chorus which continues for six months to come." Its Early Appearance Should not Excite Alarm. Occurrences of this kind — the premature appearance of an insect associated in most minds with the warmth and heat and abundant vege- * Caloptenita spretus of the earlier New York Reports. Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 333 tation of summer — never fail of exciting apprehension of its unusual abundance later in the year with serious injury to the grass crop. Such fear, however, need not be entertained. Large numbers of these locusts, in their tender and helpless condition, become the prey of black birds that come in flocks in the month of April, and feed eagerly upon them, aided in their work by others of our early appear- ing feathered friends. Furthermore, it is more than probable that this premature coming forth really serves to lessen prospective injuries from the brood, for the cold rains and frosts of early spring can not fail of killing a large proportion of those that are thus prematurely abroad, before they could find fitting shelter, even if they are endowed with the instinct in this phase of their life to seek it. The So-called Grasshoppers are Locusts. I have referred to these insects as locusts, for by this name the so-called " grasshoppers " should be known. The true grasshoppers are pale green, unicolored creatures, with long legs, and long thread-like attennre projected from their heads, of the katy-did type. There is a lamentable confusion in the common names of these Orthoptera, as when we speak of the "17-year locust" which is not a locust, but a cicada, and belongs to quite a different order of the Insects from the Orthoptera, viz., the Hemiptera. It is always hard to correct long standing popular errors, and it would be foolish to attempt it in cases like the above, were it not that there are always those — albeit a small minority — who would prefer to call things by their right names. Distribution of the Insect. This species has an unusually extended range over the United States. According to Scudder, it occurs " from the White Mountains to Key West, Florida, Texas, and westward into northern New Mexico, and southern Colorado; also in Guatemala. It is found in Iowa, Minnesota, and Nebraska (Thomas). It probably occurs in all the States east of the Rocky Mountains, although Mr. Lawrence Bruner, of the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station, has not included it among the forty- eight species of locusts observed by him in his Locust Examinations in the valley of the Yellowstone river in eastern Montana and northwest Dakota in 1885.* In reply to an inquiry made of Mr. Bruner of its western distribution, he has kindly written: " I have taken the Chortophaga viridifasciata as far west as the Rocky Mountains of Colorado and New Mexico; and I believe that it occurs also in Utah. I know that it is found in the Black Hills, S. Dakota, * Annual Report of the Department of Agriculture for the Year 1885, p. 307. 334 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum and also in the Platte river bottoms in Wyoming. These Rocky- Mountain specimens are all of the darker form — infuscata. Here in Nebraska we have both the green and the brown, and find them in about equal numbers. It is a very common insect along all our streams and at the edges of natural and artificial groves. It is especially com- mon on south hill slopes early in spring." It probably does not extend to the Pacific coast, for Mr. Coquillet has enumerated eighteen species observed by him in the San Joaquin valley California, in 1885, but this species is not mentioned among them.* * Annual Report of the Department of Agriculture for the Year 1885, page 297. NOTES ON VARIOUS INSECTS. Eriocampa cerasi (Peck). The Cherry-tree or Pear-tree f^lug. As this common insect lias not been noticed in this series of reports, a few words in relation to it may be convenient for reference. They were written in response to the following inqniry from Orange, N. J.: For a few seasons past some of our pear trees have been badly dam- aged by numerous slugs Avhieh adhere to the upper sides of the leaves and devour all the spongy portion. These pests, a sort of flesh-colored snail, appear in great numbers soon after the leaves have attained their full size. Last season some of our trees were defoliated three times by these little pests. Consequently the trees made only a partial growth, and those that produced fruit were damaged to such an extent that the fruit did not attain half the usual size. Is there a remedy ? The pear-tree slug, the ravages of which are told in the above com- munication, is a well-known fruit-tree pest, occurring on the pear, cherry, plum, and quince, and also at times on the mountain ash. It was described tinder the name of Sclaiidria cerasi over a hundred years ago by Pro- fessor Peck, of Massachusetts, in a little pamphlet, for which a gold medal and fifty dollars were awarded by the Massachusetts State Agri- cultural Society. The parent fly is a four- winged hymenopterous insect, of a glossy black color, with transparent wings, with the exception of a dusky cloud crossing the front pair. It is one of the "saw-flies," and bears *\*^eelhJ,*''ERro-' ^^® Scientific name of Eriocampa rerasi (Peck), farged ''^'*''^'' ^°' ^nd is represented in Figure 16. The female appears in the early part of June, and deposits her eggs singly in incisions made in the leaf, either on the upper or the lower side. The eggs develop into slugs in about two weeks time. Their slimy and disgusting ap- pearance is too familiar to fruit- growers to need description. In the month of August, a second Fig. ir.— The pear-tree slug, in natural size and brood of the slugs make their ^° ^'^^^ ' 336 Forty-sixth Report on tee State Museum appearance, which feed for about a month, and are frequently more destructive than the first brood. The slug is shown in natural size upon the leaf, and in enlargement beside it, in Figure 1 7. The insect is regarded as only two-brooded in Canada and in the Northern United States. Possibly there may be occasionally three broods in New Jersey, but it is not improbable that the supposed third brood may have been belated individuals of the second, as some of these do not develop the winged insect until September and even in October, while others pass the winter in the pupal state. Remedies. — This insect is not a difficult one to destroy. Powdered hellebore has long been a favorite and satisfactory remedy for this and all other of the slimy slugs. It may be distributed over the foliage in powder, or, if more convenient, it may be mixed in water in the pro- portion of one ounce to two gallons of w^ater, and applied with a force- pump. Spraying with Paris green and water would doubtless be equally effective, as the slugs feed upon the parenchyma from the upper side of the leaves. Powdered lime is also excellent for killing the slugs, when thrown by hand or otherwise over the leaves. A few years since, a young pear orchard in Western New York was severely attacked by a species of slug, allied to the E. cerasi, but apparently an uncommon insect, as appeared from examples sent me which I was unable to name. Request was made for additional specimens from which to breed the perfect insect, but answer was returned that the orchard had in the meantime been gone over with air-slaked lime, and no more of the slugs could be obtained. Road dust has also been eraploj^ed as a remedy, as almost any fine powder will kill the slugs by adhering to their viscid surface and clos- ing the breathing-pores, unless they should be near one of their molt- ing stages at the time, when the skin would be cast off and the dust inoperative. — {Countri/ Gentleman, for May 19th, 1892.) Papilio Cresphontes (Cramer). The Yellow-banded Swallow-tail. A number of the larvae of this beautiful butterfly were received from Mr. Wm. Falconer, of Glen Cove, Long Island, on October 18th of this year, with the following notice of their occurrence: " I send you a few larvfe that I found on a bush of Choisya ternata — a Mexican shrub that I set out, in summei", and take in, in winter. I first noticed them two or three weeks ago. There were a great many of them on Ninth Report of the State EyTOMOLOGiST 337 the bush then, hut since a week or ten days many of them have disap- peared: a few, hut not nearly all of the missing ones, are on the ground, dead. They did not occur on any other shrub, although there were a hundred species of shrubby plants near hyy Fig. 18.— The caterpillar of Papilio Cresphontes. in natural size. Mr. Falconer further stated, that a gentleman whose attention had been called to the larva^, identified them with some that had occurred in his garden at Creedmore, L. I., a few yeai-s ago on a Fraxinella {^Dictamnus fraxinella) bush, but on nothing else. Both the Choisj^a. and the Dictamnus belong to the family of Rutacece. Other known food -plants of the larva are prickly-ash {Xanthoxylum) ^ hop-tree (Ptelea), orange, lemon, and others of Citrxis — all pertaining to Rutacece. The larva is represented in its mature size, and in contrac- tion of its anterior segments, in Figure 18. Papilio Cresphontes is a southern species, ranging from the northern; part of South America, northward. It has gradually extended its range until now it occurs as far north as the vicinity of Montreal in Canada. The first record of its appearance in "the State of New York was in 1864. Within late years, from being an occasional visitor, it seems to have established itself in Westchester county, and at Poughkeepsie, In other localities in the State it is occasionally abundant, as in Roch- ester, where, according to Mr. Bunker, it " swarmed," one season, sev- eral years ago. Professor L. M. Underwood has written me that on September 12th, 1882, he saw several examples flying over the low swales near the Rhinebeck and Connecticut railroad in Columbia county. It has not been observed in the neighborhood of Albany. A single example was taken at New Baltimore, seventeen miles south of Albany,, in the month of September. 1893 43 338 Forty-sixth Report on tue State Museum Podosesia syringse (Harris). The Syringa Borer. This beautiful moth is generally so rare that it remains a desideratum in the collections of some of our earnest collectors. That it may, at times, multiply to an inconvenient extent is shown from a letter received from Mr. John L. Lockwood, of New York city, who, sendhig examples of the larvae in their burrows for identification, asks for some method by Avhich he may arrest the attack, as all of his lilacs are being destroyed. Possibly the insect is becoming more numerous, since, no longer con- fining itself to Syringas, it is multiplying in ash trees. Dr. Kellicott has " watched twenty or more [of the moths] emerging from an [ash] tree in a single day; and often a hundred or more were in a single tree." This was ia Buffalo {Entomologiea Americana, i, p. 177). Rev. Mr. Hulst records it {Bull. Brooklyn Eatomolog. Society, v, 1882, p. 17) as so abundant in the English ash, in Brooklyn and the vicinity, that the tree is being rapidly exterminated. He had seen trees which were " completely riddled with the holes made by the larvte and had died from the effects." Professor H. Osborn has also observed the larvie boring in young shoots of ash trees, in Ames, Iowa. It appears to be a local insect, as are also several of the Sesladce. Carpocapsa pomonella {Linn.). The Codling Ifoth. A correspondent from Malcom, Seneca county, N. Y., Mr. Malcom Little, writing November 4th, has sent a section of an apple containing a larva within its burrows, with the statement that it has done great damage to apples this autumn, in that, while not penetrating deeply, it greatly distigures the fruit. The calyx end of the apple received, had been eaten out into irregular open channels filled with rounded black excremental pellets, extending in one direction to more than a half-inch from the center of the calyx, but not penetrating deeper than its base. The calyx has the moderate depression of three-tenths of an inch below the apex. The larva is at this time, November 6th, apparently full grown and quite sluggish in its movements, as if about to prepare for pupation. In its pink color and structural characters, I find no difference in it from the ordinary apple-worm of the codling-moth. NiATiT Report of the State Entomologist 339 Dr. Harris has stated, that upon the hatching of the eggs "the little apple-worms or caterpillars ))ro(luced from them immediately burrow into the apples, making their way gradually from the eye towards the core." In this he has [until recently as will be hereafter noticed] been followed, without qualification, by all our other writer.^, so far as I recall them, and all our illustrations show such a mode of procedure. The feeding, to maturity, of the caterpillar in the apex of the apple, had never come under my observation before, and it seems to be quite new to Mr. Little, although he has long been engaged in growing fruit. Possibly it may not be uncommon, and may even frequently occur, Avhen in the second brood of moths the eggs are deposited after the fruit has attained such a size and position on the tree that the "downward" direction that at first leads to the core would no longer guide the larva thither, but rather confine it to the apex. And at this time, the seeds, for which it shows a particular fondness, may be so far removed from it as to have lost their power of attraction. Later, it was learned from Miss Little, upon inquiry, that the section of apple sent was from a Rhode Island Greening, but that " the same trouble was common in all kinds of apples this fall." It was further stated that in several instances, the burrows were at the stem end, and occasionally one would be found where the skin on the side was affectel in the same manner for a space not larger than a five-cent piece, and to a very slight depth. A few apples had been seen in which both the calyx and stem ends had been burrowed, with the core and parts surrounding, intact. It would, therefore, appear that the second brood of larvne not infrequently operate upon the fruit near its surface without penetrating to its interior. It would be of interest to learn to Avhat extent this occurs. Mr. P. C. Lewis, of Catskill, N. Y., has kindly permitted me to copy a portion of a letter addressed to him, from a correspondent in Tas- mania, who, having the agency for the sale of his force pumps for spraying purposes, has given studious attention to the life-history and habits of the codling-moth. The habits of the insect, in the anti- podes, as given, are so different in several respects from those observed elsewhere, that the letter will be read with interest: 1 do not see why the codling-moth should operate here so differently from what it does in your country, but it does, most decidedly. Per- haps it would be best to simply state my experience or the mode of operation here, and then you can note the differences. The moths emerge from the chrysalids from middle of November [corresponding with our May] to March, and deposit tJteir eggs i^romls- cuously — in the eye — on the side — on the stalk — where two apples 340 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum touch (a favorite place), — in short, there is no rule, but perhaps, if the weather is wet, a larger percentage are in the eye. They strike [lay the egg'\ from the time that the apple is of the size of marbles until they are full-grown : this must be self-evident, from the long period during which they strike — from November to March. In about a month the larva? mature, leave the apple, seek shelter, spin a cocoon, and lie in the larva state until about October or Novem- ber [April and May in New York], when they change into the chrysalis, and emerge as moths, as before stated. There are some who hold that there is more than one generation, but that is contrary to my experience. If it is so, it is the exception and not the rule. I am constantly removing bandages from January to June, and have ne^er found, in a single instance, a chrysalis or the empty case, but larvre by the hundreds. I have also experimented with larva3 under cover, taken from the apple as early as possible, and the}'- have not emerged until December. I am strongly of the opinion that spraying should be commenced early — Avhen the calyx of the apple is up, because I find that after the fruit has been struck in the eye, spraying is not effectual. The pear is chiefly struck in the eye. The apples most liable to attack are the Ribstone, Alexander, Dutch Mignon, Imperial Green, Russets, and Vic- torias. In some places, the apricot, peach, plum, cherry-plum, and even some cherries, are affected. — W. N. Cressy, Feb. 13, 1891 Referring to the habit as above given, of the promiscuous egg-laying of the moth in Tasmania, upon any part of the fruit, and even on the stem, it is safe to say, that it is opposed to all observations made in this country. Mr. L, O. Howard, in his extended account of the Codling-Moth,, contained in pages 88-115 of the Report of the Commissioner of Agri- culture for 1887, has aimed to give a complete account by bringing into one readily-accessible article a review of the life-history of the insect, and to this end, all of its literature, so far as known, was con- sulted and gleaned. According to this: "In the little crumpled-up spot caused by the falling off of the calyx the eggs are hidden, sometimes two or three to a single apple or jsear. The eggs are laid sometimes upon the smooth cheek of the apple and sometimes in the hollow at the stem, but these are both unusual." From this statement we may conclude that an e,gg of the codling-moth deposited elsewhere than in the eye of the apple is, in this country, exceptional and of rare occurrence or, at the least, has not been frequently observed.* Probably the same rule would apply to the oviposition in Europe. In a paper read before the Conference of the Fruit and Vine-grow- ers of New South Wales, Australia, in June, 1890, by J. H. Dickenson, of South Bridgewater, Tasmania, based apparently on his personal observations, we read as follows: " The moth lays her eggs in the eye • This will require qualification in view of observations since made, in Maine, by Mr. Munson, on the second brood of the insect, and given on the following page. Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 341 of the apple in the first part of the season, but later-hatched ones lay tlieir eggs on the side of the apple as well as in the eye." Accepting, therefore, as a fact, that in Tasmania eggs are frequently placed on the body of the apple, may not the explanation be found in the insular limitation of Tasmania, comparatively a small area of orchards, and such an abundance of the insect under conditions highly favorable to its multiplication, as to render it almost impossible for the moth to find an apple the blossom end of which has not already received an cg^ or two, and therefore compelled by instinct to resort to the side ? Professor Rile}- has found that, in an instance where several moths were confined under a jar with a single apple, that in a few days it was fairly riddled with young larva\* The eggs had no doubt been placed at random, anywhere on the apple. In Tasmania, the codling-moth had been a notorious pest for many years — at least thirty — before its introduction into the Australian colonies. The latitude of Central Tasmania is about equal, in degrees from the equator, to that of Central New York. A recent publication by W. H. Munson, Horticulturist of the Maine State College Agricultural Experiment Station, f shows that the apple worm enters the fruit much more frequently from other points than at the calyx than had been hitherto supposed. He states: " The objection has been raised b}^ some of our fruit-growers that a large proportion of the affected fruit is entered from side or base, and consequently that spraying before the fruit turns down has no special merit." The following result is extracted, in condensed form, from a table given by Mr. Munson, from the examination of six trees of Rhode Island greenings, four of which had been sprayed twice with one pound of Pai'is green in 250 (in two trees) and 310 gallons of water. The four sprayed trees gave 346 wormy apples, of which 133 (^=38.5 per cent) had been entered from the cah^x, and 213 (=61.5 per cent) from the side or base. The two unsprayed trees gave 449 wormy apples, of which 252 (r=56.1 percent) had been entered from the calyx, and 197 (=^43.9 per cent) from the side or base. Of the entire number of wormy apples on the six trees, more tlian one-half (51.5 per cent) had been entered from the side or base. This large proportion may probably be accounted for by the state- ment made by Mr. Munson, that " a large proportion of the fruit * Report of the Commissioner of Ar/riculture for the Year 18S7, page 91. + Annual Report of the Maine State College Agricultural Experiment Station for 1891-1692, page 105. 342 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum infested had been attackel by the second brood, and the larvae were still present" when the examination was made. Possibly the second brood may have been unusually abundant. The trees had only received the June spniyinos. Dynastes Tityus {Linn.) As a Fridf-Eater. In the notices of this insect — the Rhinoceras beetle, or the Spotted Horn-bug, as it is popularly called — in the 5th and 7th Reports of this- series, the ash was given as the food of the beetle — either the tender leaves of young shoots, the alburnum or sap-wood of the limbs from which the bark has been planed, or the sap which it has caused to flow. It has never been recorded as injuring fruits. An example of the beetle — a male — was received October 4th of the present year (an unusually late period for it) from Mr. F. H. Emmord, of Magnolia, Md., with the memorandum, " came off a ripe pear." As its occurrence on the pear might have been simply accidental, it was inclosed in a box with a ripe seckel to see if it would feed upon it. The da}' following it was found with its head and thorax buried in the pear. In the meantime, Mr. Emmond had lieen written to, asking him if the insect had eaten into the pear from which it had been taken, and if any instances of its feeding on fruit had been observed by him» The answer returned, was the following: "I found the spotted horn-bug in a soft, ripe, seckel pear which lie had eaten into quite to the core. I had laid the pear in a crotch of the tree the day before. I put him in a paper box with a piece of the same pear which he ate. Where the juice of the pear had softened the paper box he ate through it." As the beetle also in like manner ate through the saturated bottom of the box in which he was confined in my office, it is probable that the' sweet juice of the fruit is the chief attraction, and that fruit ordi- narily would not be attacked by it unless its surface had been broken,, permitting of the escape of its juices. Crioceris asparagi (Linn.). TJie Asparagu.^ Bcttle. In the notice of this insect in the Firxt Report on the Insects of JSfeto York, 1882 (pp. 239-246), it was stated, that in the State of New York "we only hear of its serious injuries from Long Island and the vicinity of New York city." It might have been added, that it was not known to occur elsewhere in the State. Nj]sth Report of the State Entomologist 343 Two years thereafter the insect appeared in Central New York. In June of that year (1884), Mr. E. S. Goff, at that time the Horticultu- rist of the Agricultural Station at Geneva, sent to me examples of larvto, and the eggs on the leaves and slender branches of the plants, with the statement that it was the first time that he had met with the insect, but that he had learned that it was quite prevalent in and about Geneva. In a com- munication to the (ieneva Courier of June 4, 1844, Mr. A. P. Rose wrote, after calling attention to the new insect (test: "I think that this must be the first vear of its appear- ^i«- 20- Asparagus beetle (a J 1 r common six-spotted formj, en- ance in this part of the State. My attention ^^""^l^ about six diameters with ^ •' further enlargement of antenna was called to the subject by the late report ^"^^ '^ont tarsus. of Professor Lintner, the State Entomologist, and on examining my own asparagus bed, I found a number of the beetles and great quanti- ties of the eggs. As yet, no damage seems to have been done by them, but when the present crop of eggs hatches we may expect to hear many accounts of their ravages." During the year (1892), the insect has made its appearance much farther westward in the State — at and about Rochester. At the meet- ing of the Association of Economic Entomologists in August, in that city, examples of the beetle taken within the city were brought in for identification. Later in the month, I learned through Mr. George S. Conover, an eminent horticulturist of Geneva, that Mr. John Charlton, florist and nurseryman of Rochester, had informed him that the insect was very destructive to his asparagus beds. Mr. Charlton had used every means that he knew of, and hid sprayed with different insecti- cides, including Paris green, but had not succeeded in relieving himself from the pest, which was still abundant with him. Systena frontalis (Fabr.) Injuring Gooseberry Foliage. This little Chrysomelid beetle was quite injurious to the foliage of gooseberry bushes at the Geneva Agricultural Experiment Station, during the later part of July and earh^ August. It had not been noticed there before. Upon the identification of the insect, received August 6th, request was made for additional examples for the State collection, but answer was returned, August 12th, that no more could be found,, the bashes having meantime been sprayed with Paris green. 344 FoRTT-sixTH Report on the State Museum S. frontalis, although common, has not as yet attained as bad a rep- utation as has some of its congeners, as for example S. blanda Mels.,* which has gone on record as injurious to cotton, to potatoes, and par- ticulary so to corn (see First Report on the Insects of Nexo York, pp. 155, 156), and to beets (Instct Life, iii, p. 149). S. tmniata (Say) has been injurious to beans in Now Mexico {Insect Life, iii, p. 122) and feeds on many of the Cuciirhitacece, and has been taken in associa- tion with a number of grass insects {id., iv, 198). S. elongata (Fabr.) is at times destructive to cantaloupes in Maryland. Chauliognathus Pennsylvanicus (De Geer). The Pennsylvania ^Soldier- Beetle. Mr. C. R. Moore, of Bird's Nest, Va., has sent this beetle — one of the Lamjyyricke — as appearing with the rose-bug in the latter ])art of May, and eating roses and blossoms of grapes. He was informed that the insect was not recog- nized as an injurious one, although it was known to feed on the pollen of various blos- soms. Writing again, he stated that he had observed the operations of the beetle on his FiQ. 21.— The Pennsylvania grapes for the past three years, and wherever soldier- beetle, Chauliognathus ^ '■ ^ . Pennsylvanicus: u, the laiva; he liad seen them operating, the blossoms were 6, its head enlarged; i, the ^ beetle. all destroyed. Should this form of injury by the beetle be established, it might be of more economic importance than the service rendered by it in its earlier stage of larva, when it is occasionally, at least, beneficial, in fer- reting out and destroying the apple-worm of tlie codling-moth and the larva of the plum curculio and, as later discovered {Insect Life, i, p. 516), feeding upon the pupae of the destructive cotton- worm. Pissodes strobi Peck. The White-pine Weevil. An attack on the Norway spruce, of what was in all probability this insect, was^reported, in August, 1892, by W. C. Pierce, of Richford, N.Y. According to his statement, one hun- dred and fifty Norway spruces, which had been planted in the cemetery at that place, commenced, last year, to die at the top. On examination, small borers were found working between the bark and the wood from above Fig. 22.— The white pne weevil. Pis- downward, and into the wood, begin- SODES strobi: larva, pupa, and imago — • • j.i ^ i i. j j ^ • enlarged. > »- ^ > & ning m the top shoot, and destroying the life of the tree as far as they progressed. ♦Recently referred, together with ligafa Lee, mitis Lee, ochracea Lee, and others, to iS. tema to (Say). See Dr. Horn's Synopsis of the Halticini of Boreal America, in Transac- tions of the American Entomological Society, xvi, 18S9. page 273. Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 345 It is the well-known habit of this curculionid beetle to deposit its €ggs in the bark of the topmost shoot of young pines, and also in sprnces, the larvai from which burrow into the wood and thence to the pith, causing the tip to die, and thereby arresting the normal growth of the tree, and producing deformity, in the crookedness produced by the sending out of lateral branches. Dr. Fitch has treated of this insect in his usual able manner in his Fourth Report, giving the natural history of the insect, and the serious injuries that it causes to the white pine — one of our most valuable timber trees. Dr. Packard has devoted a half-dozen pages to this insect in the recently issued (1890) Fifth Report of the U. S. Ento- mological Commission — on Insects Injurious to Forest and Shade Trees, in which he includes Dr. Fitch's account, wnth figures of the insect in its several stages, and its work in the deformities caused by it in white pines. In addition to the pine, Pissodes strobi also attacks spruces and hemlocks, nor does it confine its operations to the terminal shoot, but according to Dr. Packard, may " lay its eggs in the bark and mine the sap-wood of large pines and other coniferous trees." Perhaps the best remedy for this attack is to cut off and burn the infested shoots before the beetles have emerged — during the months of July and Auijust. Myzus cerasi (Fabr.), The Cherry-tree Ajyhis. Notice of a severe attack of this insect was received from Mrs. E. C. Brinkerhoff, of Nunda, Livingston Co., N. Y., under date of June 4th, 1892: We have a large cherry tree of over one foot in diameter. Some six years ago a very few of the cherries ripened that were very fine ox- hearts, but soon the remainder of the fruit was destroyed by a small, black insect similar to the small, black ant, but with wings. The insects almost entirely covered the cherries and the leaves and all Avere destroyed, but the tree leafed out again and has done so every year since. This year the pest came earlier and not a cherry was half- grown before they were destroyed. I have sprayed the tree twice each year for the i)ast three years with Paris green, but it has done no good. I have two young sour cherry trees about forty feet from it that are not affected by the insect, nor plums, nor currants, nor do I know of any other neighbors who are troubled with it. Can you tell me what I can do to destroy them ? The lady was advised that Paris green was entirely ineffective against this or other aphides, but that remedies were found in kerosene emul- sion, tobacco water, or strong soap suds, as given in the Fifth Report 1893. 4i 346 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum. on the Insects of N'eio York, 1889, pp. 256^ 257, It was important that these applications should be made as early in the season as the first aphides were seen upon the leaves, and before they are partly sheltered from the sprajang liquid within the curls or folds of the leaves result- ing from their attack. The preference shown by this aphis for the ox-heart cherry is inter- esting. Dr. Fitch has stated that it never invades any of our native or wild cheri-y trees. It was for a long time believed that it was limited to the cultivated garden cherry, but within late years it has also been observed feeding on the plum by Dr. Thomas, in Illinois, in 1878 ; and in the Country Gentleman for May 26th, 1892, I have identified the species in specimens taken from the wild-goose plum in Central Ken- tucky. It has also been foimd in Eui'ope on the black currant. The life-history of this common and destructive siJecies was fully worked out by Professor C. M. Weed, while connected with the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, and was published in the Bulletin of the Station, Technical Series, i, No. 2, May, 1890. By the kindness of the Director of the Station, the plate illustrating the several stages of the insect which accompanied Professor Weed's article, is herewith given. Pemphigus tessellata (Fitch). T'he Alder-blight Aphis. This alder aphis has been uuusuall}^ abundant the present year (1892) in various localities in the State of New York. Mr. John D. Lyons, of Monticello, N. Y., has written me that during the month of August it occurred in such numbers on the swamp alders that "it was hanging in strings from the branches." A larger number of their Avhite patches and of larger size than usual, were observed at Keene Valley, N. Y., during July and August. On removing a colony of the aphids from a branch of alder, on July 23d, thirteen of the eggs of Feniseca Tarquinius were found scattered singly, or in twos and threes on the bark beneath. For the manner in which these eggs are placed among the aphides, — for the interesting habits of the caterpillar while living among and subsisting on the aphides, and for a detailed account of the insect, the second volume of " Scudder's Butterflies of the Eastern United States," pp. 1016-1026, may be consulted. Professor Comstock, in writing of P. tessellata, has stated:* "There is a curious fungus which grows in large spongy masses immediately * Introduction to Entomology, part 1, 1888, p 166. Kg. 6. Fig, 3. Plate 1. The Cherry-tree aphis, Mtzus ckrasi: Fig. 1, apterus viviparous, female; 1 a, head and antenna of same; 2, winged migrant; 3, return migrant; 4, winged male; 4 a, head and antenna of same; 5, oviparous female. Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 347 beneath the cluster of plant-lice; this is knows to botanists as Scorias- spongiosum. It is evidently fed by the honey-dew that falls upon it." An example of this fungus has been shown me by Miss Florence Ilimes, of Albany, who had taken it from an alder in Washington park. The fungus was at the tip of a small twig that was given off from about four inches below the aphis-bearing stem, and curved upward so near it that it might easily have received (juite an amount of the honey-dcAV dropping from the plant-lice. The specimen was identified by Prof. Chales A. Peck, State Botanist, as the above-named species of fungus. Two or three other examples of the same had been seen by Miss Ilinies. Phylloxera vitifolise (Fitch). The Grapevine Phylloxera. Leaves of grapevine having their under surface almost entirely covered with the galls of this insect, similar to the representation in Figure 28, were received Au- gust 6th, from Director Col- lier, of the New York Stale Agricultural Experiment Sta- tion. They were from the vineyards of Mr. Edwin Slo- combe, of Camillus, N. Y., who reported the foliage of his Delaware grapes as being literally covered with the galls, as shown in the examples sent. The insects emerged a few days after the reception of the leaves. Dr. Collier states that the insect has been quite plentiful on the Clinton grape, in the vineyards at the Station, and had also- appeared on a few other varieties. Fig. 38.- -Grapevine leaf with galls of Phylloxera VITIFOLI.E. Crangonyx mucronatus Forbes. A Blind Shrimp in, Wells. Several examples of this crustacean were received from Oswego,^ N. Y., where they were taken from the water of a driven well of moderate depth, located in a gravelly soil, on a rising knoll. The creatures are slender forms, white, about a half-inch in length, with 348 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum rather long legs, and otlier thread-like terminal organs. " They are not occurring abundantly at the present time, but usually in the autumn small ones of the same general appearance are quite numerous." The gentleman sending them desired to know what they were, and their source, as he feared that they might render the water unfit for domestic use. It proves to be an interesting species of fresh-water shrimp which occurs only in such unusual localities as wells and subterranean streams. Like the blind craw-fish of the Mammoth Cave of Kentucky, to which it is closely allied, it is entirely destitute of eyes. It was first discov- ered by Professor S. A. Forbes, State Entomologist of Illinois, in a well at Normal, 111., and Avas named and described by him, in Bulletin JVb. 1 of the Illinois Museum of N'atural History, December, 1876, page 21. It belongs to the Order of Amphipoda and to the Family of Gamniaridm. It is described as follows, — combining the generic characters with ihe specific: C mucronatus Forbes. No eyes [a congeneric species, gracilis, has eyes]. Peduncles of the two pairs of antennae subequal. Hind angles of first three abdominal segments rounded; no clusters of spines on posterior abdominal segments. Last pair of abdominal legs with inner branch minute, outer branch shorter than peduncle; the first two pairs of feet subequal. Telson single, of male a slender spine about as long as fir?t three abdominal segments. Illustration is given of structure in seven enlarged figures. Professor Forbes informs me that the above is the first instance in which this crustacean has been reported from east of Indiana. It is not confined to wells, but it has been frequently found in certain springs in seasons of high water when the soil is saturated; it also often comes to the surface at the mouth of drains, but as it is entirely subterranean, it does not live for any length of time in surface waters. In explanation of its occurrence in drains. Professor Forbes has kindly written me: "The drains referred to in my letter are ordinary farm drains, but as the Crangonyx and its companion crustacean, Asellus stygius, do not occur in such drains indiscriminately, but only in here and there one, I presume that their appearance in such situ- ations is due to the presence of springy ground and a penetration of the tiles by the subterranean crustaceans from some underground source." The publication of the occurrence of the Crangonyx at Oswego, in the Albany Evening Journal of March 27tb, 1891, and in the New York Times, brought to light other localities in the Sate of New York and •elsewhere where it was also to be found. Referrinj; to the Times'^ Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 349 notice, Mr. Walter L. Allertoii, of New York city, wrote me as follows : They are frequently found in wells in Westchester county and in Fairfield county, Connecticut, and are generally believed to indicate the purity of the water, I have a well at my residence at Mt. Vernon [Westchester Co., N, Y.] in which they are quite abundant. This well is about fifteen feet deep, and is supplied by a large stream flow- ing through a bed of coarse gravel resting upon rock. I have also known thom to be pumped from a well in -my father-in-law's place at Berwick, Maine. I have no doubt that if there was any object to induce a careful search they would be found wherever the same condi- tions exist, viz., an underground stream of good size flowing through a layer or bed of gravel. The Asellus crustacean above named as often associated with the Crangonyx, is probably the one noticed in Insect Life, ii, p. 375, as brought up abundantly by a pump from a well in Keokuk, Iowa, and which is figured in the American Entomologist, iii, 1880, p. 36, and of which Mr. H. G. Hubbard, writing of the inhabitants of the little pools of water in the Mammoth Cave of Kentucky, states: "Though none of the pools were larger than an ordinary washbowl, I found them all veritable little aquaria, well-stocked with the crustacean described by Packard {Ccecidotea stygia). Some of the pools contained twenty or thirty specimens in all stages of growth." The presence of these crustaceans in wells need not excite the slightest fear. All of their kind are eagerly sought for food, and are regarded by epicures as great delicacies. In their subterraneous habitat the waters are necessarily, from filtration, \Qvy pare, and when, through underground currents, they are carried into wells they attest to the purity of the incoming water. As inhabitants of wells, they would serve as purifiers in the capacity of scavengers, feeding upon any injurious matter that might be present. [From the Albany Evening Journal of February 14th, 1891 .] Insectivorous Birds for Protection. State Entomologist J. A. Lintner made a vigorous protest before the committee of the Assembly having under consideration the codification of the Fish and Game Laws, against the provisions in the proposed act which gave no j) roper protection to insectivorous birds. The law under consideration repeals all former laws upon the subject. In his address to tlie committee he urged the importance of protecting all such birds as are of benefit to the agricultural interests of the State. Doctor Lintner said, that to the wanton destruction of our Avild birds was largely owing the present excessive ravages of insect pests, 350 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum greater in this country than anywhere else in the world, and rapidly increasing annually. It had become a necessity that everj^ bird which was of benefit to the agriculturist should be given protection. It was possible to pronounce definitely upon what particular bii'ds were bene- ficial,— which were of negative importance, and which were injurious. This was arrived at through the investigations of the stomachs of birds shot during every season of the year, showing the food upon which each species feeds. These investigations were mainly conducted by the Division of Ornithology and Mammalogy at Washington, and when, as the result of such examinations, perhaps of a thousand stomachs of a single species, it was definitely asserted that such a bird was beneficial, the decision should be unhesitatingly accepted without question. The bird itself had borne testimony to the nature of the food upon which it fed. Dr. Lintner asked of the committee to strike out from the printed bill under consideration, the following provision: "Nor does it [this act] protect the English spirrow, crane, crow, raven, hawk, shrike, owl, crow-blackbird or king-fisher;" also, the section, providing that the robin, blackbirds, and meadow lark may be killed during the months of November and December. Referring to the birds named in the act, the professor said: The provision exempting the English sparrow lacked the stringent legisla- tion against it contained in the old law. This bird was accepted as an •unmitigated and intolerable nuisance, the rapid multiplication of which must be checked, even if poison must be used against it, as is being largely done in Australia. The crane never occurs in the State of New York; the larger herons ai'e mistaken for it. The precise economic status of the crow and the raven, were not yet determined; their investigation was still going on. It was certain that the crow rendered very valuable service in its feed- ing upon the white grub — a notorious pest, — often pulling up young corn to reach the grub concealed in the hill. The hawks and owls, as a class, deserve jjrotection more than any other birds, for the reason that considerably more than 90 per cent of their food consists of the enemies of the farmer, viz., field mice and grasshop- pers. Even the bulk of the food of one or two hen-hawks — the red- tailed and the red-shouldered— consists of injurious rodents, and their occasional attack on poultry may properly be ignored. The northern-shrike, notwithstanding its unpleasant jjopular name of *' butcher-bird," had of late years, during its winter sojourn among us, treated itself almost entirely to the English sparrow, killing and impal- Ninth Report of the State Eistomologist 35] ing on thorns or thrusting in forks of limbs many more of the birds than it consumed in food. It should by all means be protected as a valuable ally of the farmer. The blackbirds, of which there are several species, should also be protected. When the crow-blackbird was seen tearing off the husks from the ears of corn to feed, as generally supposed, upon the corn, examination of its stomach showed numbers of a caterpillar Avhich feeds upon the tips of the f ars, and only incidentally a few kernels of the corn. The kingfisher is only injurious in fish-ponds. The robin is one of our most valuable insectivorous birds, and should therefore never be shot. It may be pardoned for the berries and the cherries that it takes, in consideration of the hundredfold return that it makes. The meadow lark feeds only on insects and wild seeds. It is difficult to imagine how one could kill for sale as food so useful a bird, the musical notes of which, while lacking the compass and volume of the famed English meadow lark, quite supasses it in sweetness. In place of the provisions of the act, which Dr. Lintner wished to be stricken from the bill, he asked to have inserted the following: " The English sparrrow [Passer domesticus) is not protected under this act, and it shall be considered a misdemeanor intentionally to give it shelter or food, except with a view to its ultimate destruction; nor does it protect the'crow, raven, or Cooper's hawk (Accipiter Cooperi), or the great horned owl {Buho Virginia7ius)y INSECT ATTACKS. Resistance of Fleas to Insecticides. That fleas are capable of resisting the effects of insecticides such as will usually destroy insect life, is shown in the following communica- tion received from a gentleman in Central New York, under date of August 14th: Deak Sie. — I am in a qnandary, and feel constrained to appeal to you to help me out of my difficulty. About six or eight w eeks ago I discovered that my cellar was infested with fleas, and 1 at once went at them with a mixture of turpentine and gasoline, and supposed I had exterminated the pests. Aboi^t two weeks later I found they were still jumping about, and I treated the floors with a solution of two ounces cyanide potassium in one gallon water. Later, I used Persian insect powder freely and an infusion of Cocculus indicus berries, one gallon containing four ounces cyanide potassium. Then I again used the insect powder, and gave my cellar two sulphur fumigations, using three drams sulphur each time. I supposed I had really knocked them out, until this morning, Avhen I found that there were still a few left to tell what they know about "hades." I have reached the limit of my knowledge of insecticides applicable to fleas, and, if you can suggest to me anything that I can use to rid my cellar of these rascals, I shall be exceedingly indebted to you. My house is a new one, with a well-lighted, airy cellar, and the fleas must have come from a Scotch Collie dog that has slept in the cellar. I have almost concluded that fleas will resist the action of any insecticide, for I noticed to-day a number of lively fellows in a barrel standing outside of my cellar, that had come up through sawdust that had been saturated with the flsh- berry and cyanide potassium mixture that I had swept up from the cellar floors a couple of weeks ago. I am very anxious to rid my cellar of these pests before my family returns from the country, and an early response from you will be greatly appreciated. I remain, sir, &c. Reply was made of inability to recommend better insecticides than those that had already been employed, unless, without endangering the lives or health of his family, the infested cellar be charged with hj^dro- cyanic acid gas [made by treating cyanide of potassium with sulphuric acid]. It was probable that the larvse had been killed by the insec- ticides used, and that the imagoes that were now appearing, in smaller numbers than before, were those which had been sheltered and pro- tected by pupation. Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 353: A resort to the favorite nneaus for the reduction of this pest, used' many years ago in Poland — " the paradise of fleas," — was recommended- for use in the present stage of the infestation, viz., setting a shallow vessel of water (a film of kerosene might be floated on its surface) on the floor, with a lighted candle standing in it. The fleas, attracted to the light, would leap toward it, and be caught in the water and killed. In Poland they would often almost blacken the water with their bodies. White Grubs Injuring Nursery Stock. A firm of nurserj^raen and florists at Newark, N. Y., have suffered severely from injuries from white grubs, as appears in the following- letter, sent under date of June 18th, 1892: " We have been corresponding with Dr. Peter Collier, of the Experi- ment Station at Geneva, N. Y., in regard to corn grubs. He has suggested that you might be interested to know about them, and, might be able to recommend something that would help us to get rid- of them. Two years ago these grubs destroyed thousands of dollars worth of nursery stock for us; last year they did not trouble us much; this year there aj^pears to be millions of them, apparently about one year old. We do not suppose they will do as much damage this season as they will if let alone till another year, but, we wish, if possible to- find some way of destroying them. Any suggestions that will help us- in this matter will be thoroughly appreciated by us." Request was made for some of the grubs to see if they could be' identified. Upon their receipt, the following answer was returned: " The larvffi kindly sent me on the 23d inst., are young white^ grubs, apparently in the second year of their growth. Whether they are those of the May-beetle, Lachnosterna fusca, or even of the genus of Lachnosterna, I am unable to say, as we can not identify with cer- tainty, especially when young, any of the manj' different species of that genus, of which nearly one hundred have been described in their beetle stage [see remarks in 8th Rept. Insects of N. Y., page 175]. " White grubs of Allorhina nitida, in experiments made in the Capitol grounds at Washington, were killed by applying freely to the ground, kerosene emulsion of the dilution of one part to eighteen of water (see Insect Life, i, 1889, pages 48, 49), and afterward carrying it into the soil by soaking it with water for several days in succession. The grubs were among the grass roots at the depth of from two to four inches when the emulsion was first applied, but were subsequently found dead at various depths down to sixteen inches. The experiment, was very satisfactory. 1898. 45 354 Fort F- SIXTH Report on the State Museum " If this metliod could be made equally effective Avith you, it would certainly j^ay to resort to it. The expense of following the emulsion with repeated water application could, I suppose, be saved, if the Icercsening should be done before a I'ainy spell. "At what depth do you find the grubs at the present time, and what nursery stock do they mostly infest ? " I wish that you would try the emulsion upon an area of some extent, and, after the rains, dig for the grubs, and see what the effect has been. The low cost of kerosene would permit of its free use if found to be effective. You probably have the formula for the prepara- tion of the emulsion — if not I will send it to you." In reply to the question of the nursery stock attacked, answer was made: "We raise mostly roses, ornamental shrubs, and grapevines. These grubs attack all of our stock; we even find them at the roots of two-year-old apple, peach, and plum trees, but they do the most damage to the roses. We would like to try the kerosene emulsion, and, if you will kindly send us the formula, we Avill do so, but fear that it may Icill the young rose-bushes as well as the grubs." The formula for the emulsion was sent as requested, but no report -of results from its use has been received. As the Entomological collection of the U. S. National Museum at Washington, D. C, contains more larval Coleoptera than any other collection in the United States, examples of the grubs noticed above were sent by me to Dr. Riley, at Washington, in the hope that they ■could, by comparison, be at least generically determined, but unfortu- nately, by some mishap, they failed to reach their destination. The enormous aggregate of losses in gardea and field crops inflicted by white grubs is offered as a reason for appending to the above some additional words in relation to this destructive class, which will be found of economic importance in directions that will be pointed out. Professor Forbes, State Entomologist of Illinois, has recently written:* " The white grubs are among the immemorial enemies of agriculture in both worlds, but in neither Europe or America has the problem pre- sented by their injuries on the farm and in the fruit and vegetable gar- den received a satisfactory solution." While still unable to recommend entirely effective, simple, and inex- pensive methods for destroying these larvj^e when infesting grass land or other large pieces of ground, we now know through the labors of Professor Forbesf so much of the life-history of the more common species allied to the May-bug, Lachnosterna fusca, that we^ may say, * Seventeenth Report on the Insects of Illinois, 1891, p. 30. + On the Common White Grubs, loc. cit., pp. 30-53, plate iv, figs. 1-7. Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 355 with certainty, when fields jnfested with these larv:B may or may not be with safety planted to another crop. For many years past we have been told that the grub of the May or June beetle required three years for its maturity. The most particular state- ment of its transformations was that given by Professor Riley in his \st Report on the Insects of Missouri, in 1869. According to this, the eggs were laid in the ground after the pairing of the beetles, and hatched in the course of a month. The grubs attained their full size in the early spring of the third year, when they changed to pupa?, and soon thereafter to beetles, emerging from the ground in May. " Under favorable conditions it is probable that some of the grubs became pupjB -and even beetles in the autumn, subsequent to their second spring," but remained in the earth until the following spring. In correction of the above. Professor Forbes has given as the result of his studies upon the white grubs in Illinois (where thirty-one species are known to occur), and more particularly upon six of the most abun- dant and most destructive species, viz., Lachnostema gibbosa, L. ifivei'sa, L. fusca, L. rugosa, L. impUcita, and L. hirticula — the fol- lowing as their life-history, quoting his carefully considered words: *' It is not too much to say concerning the six species above, and quite possibly of all the others, that they lay their eggs in June and early July; that these eggs hatch in from ten days to two weeks; and that the grubs live in the earth for a number of years unknown, but seemingly at least for two; that they may begin to pupate as early as the middle of June [late spring, but pupae may be found until September 5th] of the year when they become full grown, and may form the first imago in the earth by the middle of August and the last as late as the middle of September [all in summer], but that they very rarely, if ever, pass the winter in the pupa state. They form the adult in this latitude in late summer and early fall, and escape from the earth the following spring and early summer * * * in April, May or June, or rarely in July." Presuming, as it seems we may do, that there is a year in which the Lachnosternas deposit their eggs, — identical with the j^ears in which the beetles appear, and that these are separated by a term of years (probably three), instead of there being deposits of eggs in successive years, giving grubs of various sizes and ages in the same field, — we may educe from the above statement of life-history the following: 1. The age of grubs turned up in sj^ring plowing, seemingly about hatf-groxcn, can not positively be told; it is, therefore, uncertain whether they are to cease from feeding the following spring so as to 356 Forty- SIXTH Report on the State Museum exempt from injury by them grain sown in the autumn and crops put in the following spring. 2. If full-grown grubs (their size is well known to almost every agri- culturist) are found in the spring, no injury to roots will be caused by them after midsummer — during autumn or the following spring, — leaving winter wheat, and corn, jiotatoes, etc., of the succeeding year free from their attack. It is interesting to compare the above life-history of Lachnosterna worked out in Illinois by Professor Forbes with that j^ublished in the Patent Office Report for the year 1852, part ii, page 219, by Mr. D. L, Bernard, of Ulster county, New York, which I have quoted in my pamphlet entitled " The White Grub of the May Beetle," being Bul- letin No. 5 of the New York State Museum of Natural History. These almost pi'ecise points of agreement may be noticed: Eggs deposited generally in the month of June (Bernard); in June and early July (Forbes). Life duration of grubs, two years (B.); seemingly two (F.). larvae mature, middle of June (B.); the same (F.). Pupation, middle of August (B.) ; * begins middle of June and continues into September (F.). The perfect stage or beetle, about the last of September (B.); middle of August to middle of September (F.). The beetle appears abroad about the last of April or first of May (B.); April — June (F.). It will be observed that the above life-histories shorten the grub stage by one year from that given by most of our authors and drawn mainly from that of the European cockchafer. See, also, " Notes on Lachnosterna," by G. H. Perkins, in Insect Life, iv, pp. 389-392. The White Grub Eaten by the Robin. Mr. W. C. Little, of the Commercial Nurseries, at Rochester, N. Y., has sent me the following note of observations made by him, of the fondness of the robin for the white grub of our lawns and fields, Lachnosterna fusca: I do not remember to have seen it stated in print that the robin is a great feeder on the white grub of the May Beetle. Two or three years ago I noticed the robins industriously engaged in grubbing on our lawns. I thought at first that they were after the earth worms, but their mode of procedure was so peculiar that I was led to investigate and interrupt their operations; and in every instance I found the large white grub at the bottom of the hole which the bird had drilled with its beak — about an inch and a half below the surface. I estimated * It will be observed that this date is later than that given by Prof. Forbes. They agree as to time that feeding ceases, but Mr. Bernard says that they then " descend deeper in the earth and become torpid until about the middle of August." Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 357 that these robins must have destroyed hundreds of grubs on my prem- ises that summer. In " Bulletin No. 5 of the N. Y. State Museum of Natural History," the robin was merely named among a few other birds that were said to feed on white grubs, in the absence of any definite information of the extent to which they entered into its food. That in addition to its other well-known insectivorous habits, it is also an active white grub destroyer, should certainly increase our regard for it, and secure as far as possible its protection. A Maple-Tree Pruner, Elaphidion parallelum. The following communication and I'eply is from the Country Gentle- mxan of September 9th, 1886 : " I enclose a sample of fallen limbs taken from beneath the orna- mental maples that help to beautify the grounds surrounding the coun- try residence of Hon. J. B. Dutcher, Pawling, Dutchess Co., N. Y. These pieces represent portions of boughs that have been cut off by a worm, and have fallen to the ground. " So extensive is the injury inflicted by these insects that the handsome tree tops are becoming sadly disfigured by the unequal dismemberment of twigs and limbs that daily drop out, even if nothing worse results from it. The section of wood illustrates the manner in which the damage by these pests is effected. A knife has been passed longitudinally through one of the pieces to expose the interior of the wood. It will l)e seen that the heart or pith throughout the entire length of the piece has been destroyed. You will also please observe that the end of one of the sticks is a cross-cut, made by the worm, the woody part being neatly severed, while the outer covering or bark was left intact. It is a peculiar feature characterizing the work of this worm that it first enters the wood at the junction of a twig or limb with its larger parent stem. Having reached the heart, it turns and follows this until satis- fied with the length of the tube bored out, and is then ready to cut the limb off. The reason for selecting a knotty point wherewith to com- mence business is known only to the instinct which prompts it to injure the tree at all. The work of cutting off the limb is done from its resting place in the heart of the wood, the cut thus radiating out- wardly in continually enlarging circles until all is detached excepting the bark. There is, apparently, no aversion to attacking at any point other than a knot at this stage of the work, — the clear wood of the inclosed specimens being squarely cut off at an intermediate point between a growth of knots. 358 Forty-sixth Report ox the State Museum " Nature seldom commits the error of an absolute waste of energy, so it may be assumed that this operator has a mission of some sort, and means busiries-^. A little study into the pos- sible object this fellow may have in tree chopping, I fancy reveals an effort on his part simply to reach the ground without exposure, and the boring and cutting is merely a means to an end. The two specimens of worms which Fig. 29-Elaphidion parallelum: a, accompany the pieces of wood, I hope larva; 6, pupa, in burrow; c, the beetle; may reach you lively enough to afford «,/. 3. 'i. head and mouth parts of larva; . ,. t, • -i , ,i , t,ba9aijoinisof antenna of beetle;;, tip an examination. It IS evident that of wing-cover; A-, section of cut-off twig, while abundantly able to act on the cm ley.) aggressive, they have no means of defense, and are doubtless toothsome morsels to any prying wood- l^ecker. Their length is one-fourth to three-eighths of an inch, and their body and the absence of any rapid means of locomotion would render them an easy prey, but for instinct of secrecy during the pro- cess of severing a limb. The wood is cut squarely in two, but the out- side bark is left untouched as previously stated, so that while a wander- ing woodpecker may go about seeking a sign, no sign can be found. " The mission previously referred to, probably includes a scheme of life, covering transformations from one form and habitation to another, until finally emerging into that of a fly or winged moth, which I imagine is the immediate ancestor of this fellow. "After the wood is cut, securely hidden in the portion of the limb beyond the cross-cut, he has only to wait a passing breeze to have the branch blown off and borne to the ground. Once arrived there safely, he can quit the bough at the first favorable chance and pass into the ground. " How much damage they may eventually cause to maples can only be conjectured. Nothing similar to this pest has hitherto been noticed in the vicinity of Pawling, and any suggestion through your columns looking to a remedy or preventive will be very thankfully received." To the above the following reply was made to my correspondent,. Mr. A. T. Thomas, of New York city : The samples of wood sent, the larva (crushed and useless for specific identification), and the account of its operations given, show the cutting off of the limbs to be the work of a longicorn beetle of the genus Elaphidion, and of the species villosum (Fabr.) or parallelum (Newm.). The former, originally described in this country as Steno- Ninth Report of the State Entomolooi&t 359 corns jyutator, the oak-pruner, by Prof. Peck, in the Massachusetts Agricultural Mepository, and Journal, vol. v, 1819, is the species that so frequently comes under observation as the pruner of the red and black oaks — occasionally of the scarlet oak. It also, according to Dr. Fitch, occurs in the beech, birch, chestnut, apple, and peach; in the spruce, on the authority of Dr. Halderaan, and in the hickory, accord- ing to many writers and my own observations. E. paralleluni has been bred from some of the above food-plants, and also from plum; in the latter, not as a pruner, it is stated [American Entomologist, i, p. 187); also from apple {id., ii, p. 60). It also bores the branches of the orange, according to Mr. Hubbard. An Elaphidiou attack upon maples is not of common occurrence. Dr. LeBaron, former State Entomologist of Illinois, mentions Ela- phidion larvae as well-known pruuers of oaks, maples, and other trees (4th Report, p. 154), but I find no record of the particular species bred from the maple. They are not included among maple insects in Dr. Packard's " Insects Injurious to Forest and Shade Trees." The severe attack brought to our noti 'e in the above communication, is, therefore, of considerable interest, and it is to be hoped that the additional twigs containing the larv« which I have requested of the writer may be sent to me and will give me the beetles for identification some time during the winter or the coming spring. [They subsequently gave E. parallelum.^ The observation of Mr. Thomas of the entering of the larva at the junction of a twig or limb witli its larger parent stem, may need some correction. Tlie burrows will, it is true, be found passing from the twig into the branch, but Dr. Fitch is probably correct when he states that the beetle deposits her egg near the tip of a twig of the same year's growth in the angle where a leaf-stalk branches from it. The egg hatching, the young larva burrows into the center of the twig, and. consumes all the soft pulpy tissue until only the bark remains, which in its thin and tender condition, withers and dries. By this time the larva has eaten downward in the center of the twig, through the pith, to its base, and onward into the main branch from which the twig grows, passing to the centei', an inch or less below the twig. Here, when about half-grown, it proceeds to cut ofl: the branch, in the manner stated in the above communication, and as more fully narrated by Dr. Fitch, of Elaphidion villosiim. The account given by Dr. Fitch is quite interesting, and will amply repay for its perusal. It is to be found in his Fifth Report on the Insects of New York, pp. 17-24, and also in the Transactioiis of the New York State Agricultural Society for 1858, vol. xvii, pp. 797-812, under 360 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum the name of the Oak-pruuer, Elaphidion putator. In his Report 3, pi. 2, fig. 2, is a figure of the beetle. It is also noticed and figured in Dr. Harris' Insects Injurious to Ver/etation, 1862, p. 98, figs. 47-8-9. Dr. Packard, in his Guide to the /Study of Insects, 1869, on p. 496, represents the larva and pupa, but the accompanying figure should not be accepted for the imago. Excellent figures of E. parallelum in the larva and beetle, with enlargements of portions of the same, and of the pupa in a section of the excised branch, after Riley, may be found in Dr. LeBaron's Fourth Report on the Insects of Illinois. [These are given in Figure 29.] In speculating upon the reason for the cutting off of the twigs by the larva. Dr. Fitch writes as follows: "As the woi'm is to remain in the limb through the winter, it appears to foresee that, from being wounded, as it is, it will perish and become too dry if it remains elevated in the air; it therefore drops it to the earth, where, lying among the fallen leaves and buried beneath the winter's snow, it remains moist and adapted for the development of the insect within it." Although secreted within the central portion of the branch, the larva does not enjoy immunity from its foes. Woodpeckers may dis- cover its retreat while still upon the tree, and artfully extract the favorite tid-bit. After the larvse drop to the ground their burrows are probed, and they are extracted by many of the smaller birds, or eaten by burrowing insects. Certain it is that many of the excised twigs, when examined, will be found without the larva within them. The branches sent by Mr. Thomas were received about the 20th of July, when the larva? were already at least half -grown: the eggs had probably been deposited in early June. One of the twigs, four- tenths of an inch in diameter, had been cut off at three inches above where the burrow entered from the twig that nurtured the young larva. A section of a larger branch, over half an inch in diameter, shows the entrance of two larvte from lateral twigs, one inch and three-fourths apart. In this the burrowing is still going on, as is shown by a large quantity of small, round, hard, whitish grains of excrement which are being thrown out. [Of several branches of red oak received from McGregor, Iowa, — in one, measuring one inch in diameter, the cutting was unusually thorough, passing entirely through the wood and into the bark, leaving only a thin outer film of the bark, so that the branch would break off by its own weight. Another section of a larger branch, measuring one inch and one-half, shows one-fourth of its plane uneaten, so that the action of the wind was necessary to its breaking and separation.] Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 361 Dr. Fitch, in writing of the transformations of the oak-pntner, states that some of the worms enter their pupa state the last of autumn, and •others not till the following spring, to come forth as perfect beetles in -June. Mr. F. Clarkson, of New York city, in a recent number of the Canadian Entomologist (1886, xvii, p. 188), states that this insect was very abundant in Columbia county, this State, in 1878, and that the September winds brought showers of twigs and branches to the ground, containing nearly full-grown larvae, in tunnels of from ten to fifteen inches in length. Some of these, which had been placed in a room having veiy nearly the condition, thermometrically, of the tem- perature without, were opened in the early part of November, and were found in every instance to contain the beetle, — the transforma- tion from the larva to the imago having been completed in less than eight weeks. It is not stated whether the season had been an unusually warm one, through which the ordinary development of the insect may have been hastened. liemedy. — It is seldom that the operations of this insect amount to more than a moderate pruning of the infested trees, but, as in the instance above brought to our notice, they are seriously marring the "beauty of the trees that they occupy, it is important that the attack should not be permitted to continue and extend itself. As the insect remains within the fallen branches until the following spring, and it is probable that very nearly all the tunneled branches fall to the ground, w^e have a simple and easy method of arresting the injuries We have only to collect and burn the severed branches as soon as they fall, or at any time during the autumn, and the deposit of eggs for another brood the following season will be prevented. If danger is apprehended that the species may be continued through a few of the insects remaining upon the tree, watch should be kept for withering ends of branches during the summer and early autumn, which may be removed and ■destroyed, or the outer limbs may be beaten, after the burrowing operations have ceased, with a moderate force, Avhich would serve to break off an}' partially excised branches which the winds had failed to remove. Diabrotica vittata (Fabr.). The Striped Cucumber Beetle. A squash plant, of a growth of nine inches above the ground and three inches of stalk beneath, was submitted, June 30th, for examina- tion and for some method of destroying the insects attacking it. 1S93 40 362 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum Three of the larvue of the cucumber beetle were boring into the stalk at about an inch downward upon it, and several round holes were seen that had been made by others — some of them clean cut and others surrounded with irregular erosions; still others were superficial and had not extended into the root. On cutting open the stalk seven nearly full-grown larvtv were taken from its interior, Avithin a length of two inches, in longitu- dinal tunnels which they had excavated. Figure 30 shows the operations of the larvae within a root, and Figure 31 the larva in natural size and enlarged. The best method of protection from this form of attack would undoubtedly be in preventing the deposit of the eggs on the stalk of the plants by the parent beetle, by covering them during the early stage of growth with a thin loose muslin or netting. By the time that they have out-grown such a protection, they will have attained a sufficient size and vigor of growth to enable them to resist attack unless it be unusually severe. Possibly an Fig. 30.- Cucumber root gg^^.^y g^ppj^^j^^j^j^ q£ ^l^g burdock infusion which is infested -with the larva" • i • i t-t i-. -r -\-r of the striped cucumber noticed in the Fifth HepoH Oil the Insects of New beetle. (After Fitch.) YovTx, page 158, if repeated at intervals of about a week, would prevent attack by rendering the plants distasteful to the newly hatched larvse. Kerosene emulsion — one-fifteenth kerosene, ^tsxssm poured about the roots would destroy the eggs already deposited and such :of the l^rvje as had not already bur- rowed into the root beyond its reach. Fig. 81 -Larva of the striped cucumber In a communication recently made,, beetle, Diabrotica vittata, natural size by me to the Country Gentleman and enlarged. C After Fitch.) . ^ ^ -i~, r -mr i j experiments by Professor Weed and others, with remedies and preventives for the beetle were noticed as follows: A correspondent asks, what is the best remedy and how should it be applied for the destruction of the striped cucumber beetle? This question is often asked, but can not be replied to satisfactorily^ Various preventives are announced from time to time, as invariably giving efficient protection, but when tried b}^ other persons, in different localities, only partial success is reported. Last year a series of careful experiments were made by Prof. Weed^ of the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station in order to test the value Ninth Report of the State Entomologist 363 of the various preventive and remedial methods that have been proposed against the beetle, Diahrotica vittata. The methods experimented with were divided into these four classes: 1. The use of offensive odors; 2. Mechanical coating of the leaves; 3. Poisonous coating of the leaves; 4. Inclosing i)lants under tents or gauze-covered frames. The results of the above, made when the beetles were exceedingly- abundant, were as follows: Of class one, five substances were tested, viz.: hen manure, cow manure, carbolic acid, and bisulphide of carbon. None of these proved practically successful. Of class two, three substances were tried, viz. : coal soot, gypsum, and saltpetre. Of these, gypsum only showed some beneficial effect, while the other two were worthless. Of class three, were pyrethrum, slug-shot and peroxide of silicates. Pyrethrum killed the beetles with which it came in contact, but soon lost its efficacy. Slug-shot injured the plants. Peroxide of silicates was beneficial, and saved such plants as had been well started. Class four, or fencing out the insects, was by far the most satisfactory. It was best accomplished by covering the plants with a piece of cheese- cloth about two feet square, held up by a bent hoop or wire, or two crossing at right angles, and fastened at the edges by loose earth or stones. It would seem from the above that safety from the cucumber beetle is to be found only by excluding the insect from the plant. This method would, of course, be effectual if all attack from above and below ground could thus be prevented; but unfortunately it is not proof against the operations of the larva in the stalk, or the beetles that may develop from the ground beneath the plants. It will be observed, however, that only a few substances were tested,, and while these j^roved inefficient, it is not improbable that others, had they been tried, might have given better results. Paris green and London purple were not experimented with. Possibly they would not have been as injurious as slug-shot. A writer in one of our journals {Garden and Forest, for March 12th, 1890), has stated that he annually saves his cucumber plants by sprink- ling a handful of bone dust over each hill as soon as the seed-leaves appear, and rarely has to repeat the operation, unless washed off by rain. A corres})ondent of the Mural New- Yorker claims as a cheap, simple, and effective preventive, spirits of turpentine mixed with common land plaster — about a tables])Oonful of the turpentine to two or three gal-" Ions of plaster. " In the morning after the plants have shown up nicely, 364 FoRTT-sixTB Report on the State Museum. a man goes through the patch, taking two rows at a time, and scatters a small pinch on each hill. The turpentine drives away the beetles, and we seldom make the second application." Another writer finds safety from the beetle by planting cucumbers and beans in alternate hills. In order to get two crops from the same ground, it is marked in rows three feet apart each way, and planted with melons or cucumbers in hills alternately in- one row, and in the next, all beans. The string beans are out of the way in time for the melons to occupy the ground. Another person has tested the efficacy of beans for ten years, with perfect success, by planting a circle six inches apart around the outer edge of each hill. The beans would come up in advance, and no beetle would molest the cucumbers. {Country Gentleman, for November 20th, 1890.) The Grape Curculio, Craponius inaequalis (Say). A correspondent from Sanford, Tenn., sends grapes that have been stung by an insect, desiring to know what the insect is. The bunch from which the grapes were taken had every one punctured in the same manner. The damage to his crop from this cause was very great, and he could only secure a good crop by bagging the clusters. The grapes showed a small, dark brown spot or puncture on one side, surrounded with a rounded discolored blotch. On opening them, a yellowish- white footless larva with a pale-brown head was found work- ing within the pulp, and having partly eaten one or more of the seeds, somewhat after the manner of the caterpillar of the grape-berry moth. It was recognized as the larva of the grape curculio, Craponius inopqualis (Say). This insect is rather a local one, and is only occasionally reported as 'injurious to the grape crop, and rarely so, outside of the valley of the Mississippi river, although it ranges, according to LeConte and Horn, over the Middle, Southern, and Western States. It was found by Prof essor Webster particularly abundant on one of the Ozark mountains in Arkansas, working in both cultivated and wild grapes. I have never met with it in the State of New York, but it is probably occa- sionally found therein, as it is reported from opposite New York city, at West Hoboken. Its attack can, of course, be prevented by bagging the clusters, and as bagging not only improves the appearance of the ^g^apes, but also preserves them from injury to which they are exposed Ninth Report of tee State Entomologist 365 from several species of insects besides the curculio, and from some of the fungus attacks to which they are liable, it would be well always to resort to this method of pro- tection wherever the curculio abounds. Where this is not done, perhaps the next best means of relief would be that of jarring the beetles from the vines upon a cloth when they ..,,,, . -, • ^, Fig. 82.— The grape curculio, Craponius in^qua Visit the berries during the us: a, grape injured by the larva; 5, tbe larva. month of June for feeding on them and for depositing their eggs. The beetle may be recognized by its black color sprinkled with grayish spots; its prothorax with four large tubercles of which the outer ones are acute; the alternate interspaces of the wing-covers the more elevated and somewhat uneven; and its rounded form, unlike the oval of most of the curculio tribe. Its length is rather more than one- tenth of an inch. It is represented in Figure 32. In August, the larva having attained its growth, drops to the ground and enters it for pupation, where it remains for about a month before changing to the beetle. If during this time the ground beneath the vines could be worked, many of the delicate larvae or pupoe would be crushed or injured to a degree sufficient to prevent their maturity. The arsenical spraying so effective against the plum curculio, would not be available, it is thought, for protection against this insect. See Walsh, First Annual Report on the Insects of Illinois, 1878, pp. 13-21, fig. 1. Riley, First Report Insects of Missouri, 1868, pp. 128, 129, figs. 70-72. Saunders, Insects Injurious to Fruit, 1889, pp. 300, 301, figs. 311, 312. Webster, in Insect Life, iii, 1891, pp. 452, 453. The Peach-bark Scolytus, Phlceotribus liminaris {Harris). Mr. George C. Snow, of Penn Yan, N. Y., sent on the 7th of May, peach bark infested with the above-named insect, accompanied by the following note : I send you by this mail under separate cover a section of peach bark which you will find filled with an insect that is new to me. It may be of interest to you to know that the trees that they are in are literally full of them from collar to branches. I find an unusually large number of borers in the trees this spring. I am intending to make a mixture of sludge-oil soap, carbolic acid and lime for a tree- wash, to prevent any eggs from being deposited. Do you know of anything better ? Answer. — The insects sent in the bark are a destructive bark-borer, one of the ScolytidcB, known as Phloeotribus liminaris. Ordinarily it -366 Forty-sixth Report on the State Museum does not attack perfectly healthy trees, and from the fact that it is often found in trees affected with the " yellows,"^ years ago it was • commonly but erroneously believed to be the cause of the "yellows." As we are not acquainted with the entire life-history of this species, I hope that you will be able to tell me from your observations whether the beetles are at this time boring into the trees for oviposition or are emerging from them. From the red dust that I find sprinkled on the bark, I judge that they are entering, as the pear-tree Scolytus, Xyleborus dispar, is known to do about the middle of May. If the beetles are still resorting to the trees to commence their burrowing in, a thick wash of sludge-oil soap and carbolic acid should repel them. If very thoroughly applied, it might even reach and kill those that had . already entered, if they have not penetrated too deeply. I wish that you would try the experiment of applying with an ato- 'mizer to a single infested tree of not great value, undiluted kerosene, ' over the entire trunk, so as to have it enter the little holes that the beetles have made. I do not think that kerosene thus applied would kill or even injure the tree. I have atomized it freely over rose-bushes and small branches of plum trees, without harm resulting. If this little beetle once takes possession of a tree — unless it should be found that it can be effectually killed by kerosene as above sug- gested — the fate of the tree is sealed and it can not long survive. It had better be cut down at once and burned, rather than it should remain as a breeding place for the multiplication of the pest. The wash that you name will be excellent for excluding the peach- tree borer, and I do not know of a better one. I have noticed the P. liminaris in my Western New York . Horti- cultural Paper of last year — "Late Experiences with Insects," — and in ray Fourth Report — in each quite briefly. Albanv, 3/ay 8th, 1891. From the small piece of bark received from Mr. Snow, there were found on June 15th in the box in which it had been placed, four dead and one living P. liminaris beetles, with living ones still in the bark. To those who still entertain the belief that this beetle, in its attack of peach trees is the cause of the "yellows," the reply made by me, through the Country Gentleman of November 3d, 1887, page 837, to an inquiry from Ringwood, Ontario, Canada, may be of interest: Inclosed I beg to hand you specimens of an insect taken from one of my peach trees. The inspectors for the yellows have recently been through this district, and on examination, have condemned several trees in my orchard and others. They say that the presence of this insect is a sure indication of the yellows; also an examination of the NiKTH Report of the State Entomologist 367 now little remaining fruit they sa}^ also shows signs of the disease by the pinkish appearance of the flesh around the stone. The insect appears to bore into the bark at the butt of the tree, similar to the borer, but above ground, showing a small amount of sawdust around the hole. Would you kindly give me through the columns of your valuable paper your opinion ? While being perfectly willing to destroy the trees if so advised, we are not quite so sure of the expeiience of our inspectors to justify us in destroying our orchards. E. F. O. The insect sent, taken from i)each trees, the presence of which, according to the statement above, fruit-tree inspectors of Ontario pro- nounce to be a sure indication of " yellows," is one of the ScolytidcB, or bark-boring beetles, known as Phkeotrihus Uminaris (Harris). Its presence in a tree by no means shows the existence of " peach yellows'* therein. Many years ago, Miss Morris found the beetle under the bark of peach trees affected with the yellows, and hence supposed that it was directly connected with that malady (Doionmg^s Horticulturist, iv, p. 502, and Hams' Insects Injurions to Vegetation, 1862, p. 88). Dr. Harris and Dr. Fitch each found it under the bark of elms, where it occurs so often that it has been written of by Saunders in his Insects Injurious to F'ruits, and by other writers, as " the elm-bark beetle."* This beetle, like most of the other members of the Scolytid