HARVARD UNIVERSITY. LIBRARY OF THE MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY. \Y.20\0 GIFT OF ALEXANDER: AGASSIZ: SE A Ny JUN 4 1904 \A.25\0 Noes ET: REPORT: FOR 1908, ON THE LANCASHIRE SEA-FISHERIES LABORATORY THE Bee as OF -LIVERPOOL, AND THE SEA-FISH HATCHERY AT PIEL. DRAWN UP BY Professor -W.- A. Herpman; D.Sc; F-R:S., Hon. Director of the Scientific Work, Assisted by Mr. Anprew Scort, A.L.S., and Mr. James JOHNSTONE, B.Sc. WITH at the University of Liverpool ; (5) Practical Laboratory Classes for Fishermen and for school teachers, conducted by Mr. Johnstone and Mr. Scott, at Piel; (4) Observations at sea on board our Fisheries Steamer “ John Fell.” 9) — Some matters that can be treated briefly I shall remark upon in this introductory part of the Report; the others will be discussed more fully in the special articles that follow. Tam glad to say that the very full account of the Fisher- man’s “ Lugworm,” which Dr. J. H. Ashworth (formerly of Owens College, Manchester, now at the University of {dinburgh) has been preparing for some years, is now finished, and I am able to add it as an Appendix to this Report. The expense of lithographing the beautiful plates that illustrate this Memoir has been largely met from an outside source. Dive. Piel, Matebe sya Mr. Scott’s account of the Sea-Fish Hatching at Piel will be found in the next section of the Report. As on former occasions, the fish dealt with were the Plaice and the Flounder, and out of close on seventeen millions of eggs obtained nearly fifteen millions were hatched and distributed in the sea as fry. The total loss from all causes during the operations was just under 11 per cent. It can scarcely be doubted that the natural mortality in the sea during the corresponding period in the life of the young fish embryo must be enormously greater than this. The benefit of protection would be, however, still further increased if we had the accommodation necessary for keeping and rearing the larve to still later stages. This is impossible without a fish pond; and Mr. Scott points out that he cannot, with his present small tanks deal with much larger numbers than those that passed through his hands this year. An open-air fish pond has proved a success elsewhere. An American fish-culturist, Professor Mead, of Brown University, who visited the Port Krin Biological Station last summer, expressed his satisfaction 3 at seeing the fish pond there, and evidently regarded it as a necessary addition to any hatchery. I would repeat again what I stated to the Committee last year, that no hatchery is complete without a spawning and rearing pond, and that the want of one at Piel seriously impedes Mr. Scott’s operations. ra wince Re sa lt sit an) We are now preparing for the hatching work of the coming season, and once more we are indebted to the courtesy of the Fishery Board for Scotland for permission to trawl for large plaice in their closed waters of Luce Bay. As before the Fishery Board asked us to make observations and to give them a record of our results. Two trips were made to Luce Bay in October and Novem- ber and our Naturalists who accompanied the steamer were able to make a series of interesting hauls on both oceasions. The results are fully discussed by Mr. John- stone in his article on ‘‘ Trawling Observations,” which will be found below. These results confirm those obtained in 1902, and reinforce the conclusions which I drew in last year’s Report as to the remarkable differences in the catches which may result from very slight differences in the positions and conditions of the grounds trawled. The bearing of these observations upon the danger of any attempts to draw conclusions from samples taken relatively far apart, even on areas where uniform condi- tions are supposed to obtain, must be obvious. Mr. Johnstone also draws attention to the very large average size of the plaice in the closed Scottish waters, and shows how the much smaller size on the Lancashire coast may be regarded as the natural result of constant and practically unrestricted fishing. 1 The ‘Classes in Biclogy at’ Paes I have also received from Mr. Scott a report upon the other work and the leading events of the year at our Piel establishment. It will be found below, and consists mainly of a record of the practical classes held in the laboratory, and of the visits of scientific men, and other Sea-Fisheries and Educational Authorities. Our Fisheries Exhibition is still on view at the Piel Laboratory, and is a useful adjunct to the teaching resources. It can, however, be sent out on loan, as formerly, when required; and any public institutions within the contributing counties desiring to show the exhibit should apply to the office at Preston for a copy of the conditions upon which it may be obtained. Fish Parasites and Diseases. Some time ago I suggested to Mr. Scott, who has been working for years, at odd moments as opportunity offered, upon the parasitic Crustaceans of our seas, that he should extend his observations to the parasitic worms and other lower animals that may cause diseased condi- tions, and give us a list of all the fish-parasites he was able to detect. A first, and very considerable instalment, appears below, consisting of four Protozoan, ten Trema- tode, one leech and forty-six Copepod parasites, taken, as will be seen, from a varied assortment of fishes, and from very different positions in the body. The Cestodes (tape- worms) and Nematodes (thread-worms), not included in this paper, will follow on some future occasion. Mr. H. M. Woodcock, of University College, London, has examined for us two of the Protozoan parasites, and contributes a useful paper on “ Myxosporidia in Flatfish,” which enumerates all these parasites which have yet been ~ oO found, and also contains a description of a new species, Sphaerospora platesse, from the Plaice. Mr. Woodcock in a second paper describes a very remarkable parasite, Lymphocystis johustonei, from the Flounder. Oiinh ene | Wrormke. Mr. R. D. Laurie, a former student of our Zoological Department at the University, has contributed a short note bearing on the question of the number of eggs that can be produced by an adult plaice. His results for plaice, of about 20 inches in length, from the Irish Sea, agree with those obtained for other seas. Of the three or four hundred thousand large eggs present on the average in such a fish only a comparatively small number are mature at a time, the plaice setting free its ova in successive small batches over an extended spawning period. In stripping a spawning plaice only a certain small proportion of the eggs in the ovary can be extruded. The subject of pearl formation in Molluscs, such as mussels and oysters, has been brought into prominence of late years by several investigations and reports both in this country and abroad. As the matter is one of con- siderable public interest and importance, and as there is at present a good deal of misapprehension in connection with it, caused by sensational statements derived from some of the French papers, I have thought it well to give a brief account of the more important recent discoveries and views bearing upon the subject of pearl-formation. The relation of sewage disposal to the pollution of our coasts, and to the possible infection of edible shell- fish with pathogenic organisms, has become a matter of national importance. Some previous work done in our laboratory 8 years ago,* drew attention to the matter * See Report of Ipswich meeting of British Association, Sept., 1895, and Lancashire Sea-Fisheries Memoir, No, L., 1899. 6 locally, and since then investigations have been carried on at various points round the British coasts, and for the last few years the Royal Commission on Sewage Disposal has been taking evidence and deliberating on the subject. Both Mr. Dawson and I, in our evidence before the Royal Commission, have drawn attention to the very serious state of affairs on some parts of the Lancashire and Cheshire coasts, and we have lately planned a more thorough examination into the condition of the shell-fish beds of the district. Mr. Scott has inspected for me several of the mussel and cockle producing areas in the northern part of Lancashire, and Mr. Johnstone has made a bacteriological examination of the samples of shell-fish that have been sent to the laboratory. As the Royal Commission has also just issued a Report? dealing with these same questions, and very much on the lines we have adopted, I have thought it appropriate to devote a few pages further on to a discussion of the matter. A suggestion, made by Mr. Fell, that we should report upon the intricate question of the inter-relations between shrimps and young flatfish, has led to the preliminary statement of the subject which, with Mr. Johnstone's help, I have drawn up. It is evident that a great deal of exact information is still required. I have tried to focus attention upon what is known and what is unknown, upon what the essential problems are and what investigations are necessary in order to solve them. But it is clear that this is one of the matters upon which we cannot get wholly satisfactory evidence until we have, on the West Coast of England, a steamer devoted solely to scientific fisheries work, so that an organised scheme of investiga- tion, combined with the collection of statistics, can be ‘arried out. It would probably require a couple of years + Pollution of Tidal Waters with special reference to contamina- tion of Shell-fish. London, 1904. 7 of such organised work before reliable conclusions could be arrived at. Still the outline of the sub-divisions and relations of the investigation given below may be useful to the Committee as showing the complexity of such a question, and the need for a very thorough systematic investigation of all such fishery matters. Finally, I may refer to the most important event of the past year in connection with Sea-Fisheries Organisa- tion and Administration in this Country, viz., the trans- ference of the Official Government department dealing with these matters from the Board of Trade to what is now the Board of Agriculture and Fisheries. This must be a matter of congratulation in so far as it gives to our subject more of the high relative position and the im- proved status to which its importance entitles it,, and which it possesses in most civilised countries. Although not yet an independent department of State, with a Minister for Fisheries, it is now conjoined on an equality with the allied subject, Agriculture, under a President, Lord Onslow, who recognises fully its claims to his attention, and will assuredly give sympathetic and adequate treatment to the new division of his department. The union of Fisheries with Agriculture is a natural one, which we see working well in Ireland, in several of the Colonies and elsewhere. Aquicriture and Agriculture have similar disciplines, and similar methods should give similar results. The operations that result in the harvest of the sea being now placed under the same guiding hand as those that affect the harvest of the land, we may hope that in the former case as in the latter the returns from nature will be increased as the result of scientific cultivation. From the scientific point of view the present division of the territorial waters of England and Wales into Sea- 8 Fisheries Districts is not satistactory. The Districts are too numerous and unequal, the boundary lines are arbi- trary and unnatural, the methods of the Authorities are too diverse; and, as a result, the fisheries are very un- equally treated both as to administration and investiga- tion. A glance at the details of expenditure of the difterent Committees is enough to show how perfunctory and inadequate the examination and protection of the fisheries must be on some parts of the coast. For these, and other reasons, the Iechthyological Com- mittee in their Report last year recommended for purposes of fisheries investigation a consolidation of the Districts and Authorities on each of the three great coast lines of England and Wales—LHast, South and West. It may be worth while to reproduce once more the accompanying rough sketch plan in order to bring this idea clearly before the mind and to show how the three suggested Districts form natural coast areas. Mr. Fell has since shown* that there would be advantages in the amalga- mation of the present Committees on each coast, not only for purposes of investigation but also for administration. He has gone into the question of probable income and expenditure and finds that each such large area would have a rateable value of about thirty millions sterling, yielding, on the rate of one-sixteenth of a penny in the pound, a sum which, according to our Lancashire scale of expenditure, ought to be ample for the proposed work. In these calculations London is left out of account. Its contribution, from a similar rate, if obtainable, might be applied to general central expenses or to special work applying to the whole country. Looking at the West Coast as now administered it is obviously unnatural and inconvenient that the large * I quote from a letter and from a speech by Mr. Fell. So far as I am aware his tigures have not yet been published. i) FISHERY COUNGIL FOR ENGLAND Fic. 1.—Sketch map of the British Islands for the purpose of indicating the positions of the chief marine laboratories and sea-fish hatcheries, and the proposed division of the coast of England into three great fisheries districts—the Hast coast, the South and the West—as recommended by the Ichthyological Committee. 10 Lancashire and Western area should be cut off from the Solway Firth to the north and from the Bristol Channel to the south. In studying the distribution and move- ments of plaice throughout the seasons of the year, and the life of the fish, it is evident, even from our few obser- vations during the last couple of years, that the great shallow water areas of the Solway are of considerable interest. This is recognised by the Fishery Board for Scotland as well as by ourselves, and on more than one occasion now they have asked us to make observations for them from our steamer, and to aid them in obtaiming young fishes for their transplantation experiments. We are also at the present time preparing to co-operate with the Fishery Board in certain drift-bottle experiments for the purpose of determining the movements of the surface waters of the Irish Sea and the Clyde Sea-area, such as may affect the drift of fish eggs and larve. This is as it ought to be, and if the whole west coast from the Solway to the Severn were in the control of one Authority, effi- ciently equipped with boats and observers, an organised co-operation with the Fishery Board for Scotland would be natural, and a joint investigation of the Solway and of any other problems of common interest would undoubtedly be effected. The Isle of Man should also join this proposed western amalgamation. The seas round that Island are closely related to the Lancashire waters, and whatever the fishermen may be required to do, the fish respect no terri- torial boundaries. The Isle of Man has everything to gain by coming into line with the English counties. To administer the insular fisheries alone would be an extrava- gant process. Joined with Lancashire and the other counties in a western combination, in return for a very A, moderate rate the Manx fisheries would be adequately dal exploited and policed—-the regulation and administra- tion would be the same as over the adjoining English and Welsh coasts. We should then have in this northern part of the Irish Sea a natural sea-fisheries district ad- ministered by one Authority, having one steamer for police regulation and another for scientific investigation, having central laboratories in the University of Liver- pool, with Marine Stations and Hatcheries at several distant points, probably in the north of Lancashire (Piel), in the Isle of Man (Port Erin), and somewhere on the coast of Wales. The co-relation between such labora- tories and those on the other coasts of England, and again between Mngland, as a whole, and Scotland, Ireland and, it may be, other Countries, might well be as was outlined in the Report of the Ichthyological Committee. If such a national scheme of fisheries co-ordination were carried out it would lead, in addition to increased efficiency of administration, to a marked increase in the scientific knowledge of our fishing grounds, the absence of which successive Select Committees and Conferences have had to deplore. W. A. HERDMAN. Tur University, Liverrootn, January, 1904. 12 SEA FISH HATCHING AT PIEL. By Anprew Scort, A.L.S. In the operations carried on during the fish hatching season of 1903, the eggs of plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) and flounder (PJ. flesus) were again dealt with. At the beginning of the year there were 100 mature plaice and 200 flounders in the tanks. The plaice, as in former years, were brought from the closed waters of Luce Bay by the fisheries steamer, and the flounders were collected in Barrow Channel by Mr. Wright. The fish, on the whole, were not so large as those used in the hatchery work of 1902, but from the increase of numbers, and by main- taining a good circulation of water, we were able to improve upon the results then obtained. Under the present system we have probably nearly reached the maximum number of fish that can be accom- modated with safety. Further development, as we pointed out in last year’s Report, can only be secured by an addition to our present resources. The fish hatchery at Bay of Nigg, and the hatchery at Port Erin have both open air ponds which are of immense use in all hatching work, and must be considered as an essential to further progress. The first fertilised eggs were collected and placed in the hatching boxes on March 9th, and the last on May 7th, so that the spawning season with us extended over a period of two months, or about two weeks less than in the previous year. During the spawning season nearly seventeen millions of eggs were collected and incubated and those eggs produced close on fifteen millions of fry which were set free as before near the centre of More- cambe Bay. ‘The periods of incubation of the plaice and flounder eggs were practically the same as last year, from 13 ten to seven days for flounder, and from seventeen to fifteen days for plaice. The total loss during incubation from all causes was just under 11 per cent. The following tables show the numbers of eggs collected and of the fry set free on the dates specified. PLAICE. Eges Collected. Fry Set Free. Mareh 9’ -.» 40,000 35,000 ... March 26 a 50,000 44,000 ... April 8 me we lihe. 4.500.000 44,000 ... i ; ge 2S 00,000 | 44,000... ni Ny we 5c 000 43,500... x We ee 2Oe o45 60,000 08,0005): - 16 ee SU... 560,000 93,000) 42: ie * Me Mf, 3b, 000 67,0005 * 22. is 5s s 20. “2.24 9 O,000 62,000... ay i re 22... £60;000 5}3}(0, 010) Nae * 13 - 951 2257,60;000 53,000... a a FF Diy eee, 10000 62,000... a uf Cs SO 22 (0,000 62,0005 =;.. iS 92. May De 60,000 | aaa, C005 s. ‘ i - 4... €0,000 62,000 ... a i an eure. (60000 BorOleld) Wess 7 ‘es Total Eggs 1,400,000 1,237,000 Total Fry 14 FLOUNDER. Higgs Collected. March 9 ... 200,000 tO ie ST OO0C oe aes WATOLO00 io dl» ee 54803000 ~ , 23 27 000000 oy eee 4a OUU ~ al) oe 600006 April 2 ... 600,000 a 4... 800,000 0 S2 GG; 000 - g 900,000 . 11 igi 000,000 : 3,22. 900000 iy ise ee 700,000 i 1. a S00000 ‘ 20... 800,000 Ss 2 228" 3800000 i 95 800,000 a P| al ,000,000 ¥ 30. TOO B00 May amma 6.001 0.016) fe 7 eae 600,000 7 «3 400,000 Total Begs 15,300,000 Total Number of Eggs Total Number of Fry Fry Set Free. 178,000 ... March 26 498,000... April 428,000 ... ,, 4970000. sien 445,000 ... ,, 498,000 ... _,, 582,000 ... __,, 532,000... ,, 715/000: 1 eee 623,000 ... _,, BOd'O00:, ames BOGKIO.-1 2 wae 800,000... May 623,000... ,, TO 00. ae Mae TiO O00; 8 fREUUC Venerol 712500 0 es 890,000: ai 623,000... ,, 582,000 ... ,, 582,000 ... ,, 56/0000 ne 13,630,000 Total Fry. 16,700,000 14,867,000 8 — Or CLASSES, VISITORS, &c., AT PIEL LABORATORY. By ANDREW Scott. The Fishermen’s Classes, conducted at Piel under the auspices of the Lancashire County Council and the Sea- Fisheries Committee, have now become an established in- stitution. Hach year they are held the competition for places gets keener. The grant given by the County Council in 1905 enabled us to take forty-five men, fifteen more than in the previous year. Applications for places were to be sent to Mr. Dawson, and by the beginning of March no less than sixty-two names had been received, all of fishermen from between Southport and Roosebeck. Three classes of fifteen men to each were formed, and the selected men were notified regarding the date and times of attendance. They all duly presented themselves at Piel and went through the course of instruction as in previous years. At the end of each class the usual votes of thanks to the Sea-Fisheries Committee and the County Council for the privileges afforded the men for acquiring a better knowledge of the life histories and habits of the economic marine animals were duly proposed and carried. Some of the men expressed the hope that in the near future a second and more advanced course would be pos- sible for those who had already gone through the first one. The suggestion has also been made by some Members of the Committee that one or two prizes, such as a small microscope and some pocket lenses, might be offered for competition in each class. This would have the additional advantage of encouraging some of the men to continue the work after returning to their homes. Mr. Johnstone, from the Liverpool Laboratory, again had charge of the classes, and the following are the names of the men who attended :— 16 Class held March 9th to 20th.—J. J. Peet, Lytham; Thomas Newsham, Lytham; John Leadbetter, Fleetwood ; Krnest C. Leadbetter, Fleetwood; David Moss, Fleet- wood; John Colley, Fleetwood; James Carter, More- cambe, James Johnstone, Morecambe; Wilfred \Wood- house, Morecambe; J. G. Gardner (Secretary Fishermen’s Association), Morecambe; Hugh Rimmer, St. Anne’s; James Robinson, Southport; William Jackson, South- port; Thomas Wright, Southport; John Wright, Southport. Class held March 231d to April 83rd—lLawrence Abram (Ned’s), Banks; John Wareing (Stephen’s), Banks; Richard Sharples, Banks; Richard Wright, Marshside; Nicholas Wright (Selby), Marshside; John Harrison, St. Anne’s; Harry Melling, St. Anne’s; John C. Pegler, Fleetwood; T. P. Ball, Jr., Fleetwood; William Wilson, Fleetwood; Thomas Wilson, Fleetwood; James Bond, Morecambe; George Bond, Morecambe; William Brown, Morecambe; John Birkett, Morecambe. Class held April 20th to May 1st.—Robert Wright, Marshside; Jeffrey Ball, Marshside; Robert Harrison, St. Anne’s; Nicholas Parkinson, Lytham; Thomas Whiteside, Lytham; Robert Clarkson, Lytham; Fred. H. Pegler, Fleetwood; Richard Bond, Morecambe; Richard Bond, Morecambe; Walter Bell, Morecambe; James Cocking, Morecambe; William Johnson, Ulverston; J. Bouskill, Flookburgh; James Butler, Flookburgh; David Wilkinson, Baicliff. In addition to these Classes for Fishermen, two courses in Nature Study for School Teachers were arranged, and proved a successful experiment. The first one was attended by seventeen head masters, head mistresses, and assistants from the schools under the Barrow School Board. It was held on two evenings and 17 the Saturday afternoon of each week during the last of the series of Fishermen’s Classes. The second class was held by desire of some of the Morecambe teachers, and was taken advantage of by the head master and_ first assistant from three of the schools. | The Barrow teachers travelled to and from Piel by train each day. The six Morecambe teachers came during the Whitsuntide vaca- tion and lived in the establishment during that week. Four hours’ instruction were given on the Tuesday, Wed- nesday, Thursday and Friday, and the men spent the remainder of the time investigating the shores and neigh- bourhood. The first class was conducted by Mr. John- stone and myself: the second one, in the unavoidable absence of Mr. Johnstone, I carried on alone. The course im each case was a practical one, and instruction was given in the structure, life history and habits of common marine animals, such as the cod, the shore crab and its allies, the cockle, the mussel, the oyster, micro- scopic life in the sea water collected by the tow-net, the various animals living on the shore between tidemarks, and material washed up from the sea bottom. Much interest was shown by the teachers in the work, and from the remarks made at the conclusion of the course, it was evident that a continuation of these Nature Study Classes at Piel would receive much support from school teachers in Lancashire. For teachers resident in Barrow, evening and Saturday meetings are most con- venient; for others, vacation courses alone would be pos- sible, unless other arrangements, involving leave of absence, could be secured. To the school teachers of Lancashire, Piel offers many advantages for the study of common marine animals and plants. From a distance the shore at low water may seem very uninteiesting and barren, but a more careful B 18 examination shows that it is far from being so. Many species of Molluses occur, including the ordinary mussel, some of which here produce pearls in abundance; the sand is teeming with the ordinary “ lug-worm,” with its beautiful external branchial plumes; various forms otf erustacea abound, and there is a varied assortment of fishes. The rough scars provide many species of sea- weeds, and in the spring and early summer the water contains a good general floating fauna and flora which can be collected by tow-net. Even the debris washed up by storms and strewn along high water mark, as we have found from experience, proves a mine of interest. ‘To the teacher, where time is a consideration, it may be pointed out that it is possible to leave Manchester or Liverpool by 5-45 p.m. train and arrive at the Piel Laboratory at 8-45 p.m. the same evening. Other trains from Barrow to Piel are also run. ‘There are also con- -venient trains for returning. On January 28th a meeting of representatives from the various Technical Instruction Committees in the county was held at Piel, for the purpose of hearing an address from Professor Herdman, on “ Technical Instruction in Sea-Fisheries Science” (see last year’s Report), and also to inspect the equipment of the Laboratory with a view to teaching fishermen and others. The Special Subjects Committee of the Barrow School Board visited the establishment during the course of the second fishermen’s class in order to see the men at work. They seemed much impressed by the keen interest dis- played by the fishermen in the instruction given and in their practical work. The Chairman and Members of a number of the Lancashire local Technical Instruction Committees under 19 the leadership of Mr. James Fletcher and Mr. Dawson, paid an inspection visit during the course of the third fishermen’s class. Several members of the party delivered short addresses to the men. Mr. Thomas Baxter and party from Morecambe visited the establishment while the Morecambe school teachers were at work. Another meeting of Representatives from the Techni- eal Instruction Committees of the Lancashire County Boroughs was held in the Laboratory at the end of July. The meeting was for the purpose of further developing the facilities for the teaching of Marine Natural History to fishermen, school teachers and others. Mr. Fell, Mr. Ragdale, and other members of the Committee addressed the Representatives. They pointed out the advantages that the Piel establishment presents, and the ease of access to it from all parts of the county. Reference was made to the satisfactory reports on the teaching work already accomphshed under more or less temporary conditions. The St. James’ Rambling Club and the Barrow Naturalists’ Field Club also visited the establishment during the summer. Many visitors have been shown through the Labora- tory and tank-house. We have also had an inspection visit from Mr. Fryer, of the Board of Agriculture and Fisheries. Professor Herdman and the late Mr. I. C. Thompson, F.L.8., from Liverpool, stayed over a week end in order to make some investigations, in addition to shorter visits at other times during the year. 20 TRAWLING OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS. By Jas. JOHNSTONE. (1) Sax,i\Hauls an Luce: |) Bayggeae October 26th, £4905. By permission of the Fishery Board for Scotland the Lancashire and Western Sea Fisheries Committee’s steamer was enabled to make a series of hauls with a trawl-net in the preserved waters of Luce Bay, on October 26th, 1905. The primary object of these trawling opera- tions was to obtain a stock of mature living plaice for the Committee’s Sea-Fish Hatchery at Piel. Advantage was taken, however, of the opportunity thus afforded to com- pare the results usually obtained by fishing on the plaice grounds within*the Lancashire and Western Sea Fisheries area, Where trawling is permitted under certain restric- tions, with those obtainable by fishing in waters strictly preserved against all forms of trawling. In order to obtain the fish in as healthy a condition as possible a series of short hauls were made with a rather small trawl- net of 50 feet beam, and with 7 inch meshes throughout. By using such a net a very hmited number of inverte- brates were captured, and few small fish were obtained. \— The smallest plaice obtained in any of the hauls was 8: NS t inches in extreme length. The results of these hauls are given in the table on following page. Physical observations during the hauls. Wind, 8.W., light; Sea, smooth ; Weather, unsettled ; Barometer, 29°4 to 29°6 inches; Air temperature, 0°-5- C2 to Ade: GeO 21 6G 89T “SUOT SO[LUt Z “oryeanp moy T “INVA, 499 ian) ae) laa) “SUOT SoTIUt $7 ‘uolyRanp sanoy FT “IAVAL 44g "COG ‘HI9QZ NYAOLOQ NO AVG OAT NI stavzT 9 ao 0G CT 0G VV “Suuoy soqrut ET ‘uoryeanp inoy = “TAVA WF OFT ‘SUOT Sop $7 ‘molyeanp sanoy FT - ‘INVA, pig IGG CTT OOOO POLLO OCPD mist slsiere qysneo SOUst iy [PIO 7, PS | | 5 G i i i ei i i aera) Ssprvuans) Aaaty Ti Peer mmm mers e reese ses rssseesccesceseers oulry sie) ele /e\e) ele alele (eels selec eve s/n s\eleieieleiels sbielein.6 SUITpoO T ee ee ed eee rete ee topunoy] iT 7 | IF ORI CNM CR MCN HMC MOTE HY CHC SCT Ue ESIC Ur Se SOLO 2 | Teer ae: (srupjna.ua vlpyy) Keay OF | Se BNE coRicnac cat (nppa yo plpa7) Awry 99 OT ie ferereranolotersleysuetousisvereatelcterekatexie efereveveie “sqeq ze GT ““UYSusy [VIO] UL ‘UL FT TAAO oorelg 90% GE —-"YASusy [e404 UT “UT FT topun aoe] gq “SUOT SoTTut £7 ‘toTyRaNp samoy ET "IAVE, pug “Suo] soprur $7 ‘TOryRanp samoy tT "TOVET ST. “LHDOV() HSI SUTASAY 22 Sea temperature at surface, 104 C. to 11%) C.; bottom, 10°°6 C. to 1192 C.; Specific gravity of sea at surface, 1025 to 1027; a4 bottom, 1:025 to 1°027. The positions of the hauls are shown on the sketch chart below. The results of these hauls demonstrate strikingly the 99 bi] restricted distribution of fishes on an area of very limited re . ; aN { wat SK Sandhead x \ SS \ —S < a x Ny (Port William \ \ mS \ LUCE BAY ( baronet ha, = aa NS Mull of Galloway Chart of Luce}Bay. extent, and over which the physical conditions, which might be supposed to influence the abundance and nature of the bottom fauna, are very similar. The chart shows that fishing was restricted to the west and north-west margins of the bay. The bottom was uniformly sandy, and the depth varied from 9 to 5 fathoms. Hauls 1 to 3 are comparable in all respects; the depth varied from 23 7 to 9 fathoms, the duration and length of the drags were identical, and all three were made dragging with the stream. Nevertheless, the number of plaice taken varied from 51 to 438, the dabs from 10 to 68, and the ray from 26 to 40. The fifth haul was made dragging in towards shallow water. The fourth and sixth hauls were shorter than the others, being of one and three-quarters and two miles length respectively. They differed, however, to an extent which is not accounted for by their difference in length, as the fourth yielded only 64 plaice, while 197 were obtained in the sixth. The sixth haul, too, was made in the dark when, according to general experience, plaice are more difficult to catch in the trawl net. There is a general similarity between the results of the first three hauls obtained on this occasion and those obtained on October 21st, 1902 (see last year’s Report, p. 85). The positions, states of the tide and lengths of drag are very approximately the same in each series. Both the first hauls, dragging north from Drummore yielded poor catches (14 and 68 plaice, respectively), the second hauls gave much better results (438 and 157 plaice), while the third were again poor (17 and 51). The results obtained on the present occasion confirm then those obtained in 1902, that is, that a trifling difference in position of the ground dragged over may correspond with very remarkable differences in the volume of the catches. This, indeed, is well known to fishermen, but it is a factor which has not been sufficiently recog- nised in statistical trawling operations, where it has been generally assumed that the distribution of fish on a large area is fairly constant. Sizes of the plaice obtained. The main object of the trawling operations was to obtain mature plaice, and in each haul all the fish of over a4 14 inches in extreme length were at once separated out and brought back alive. The number of these obtained in each haul is given in the Table, and is about 11°5 per cent. of the total number caught. The sizes of the fish caught were, so far as could be judged by a mere inspec- tion, very similar in each haul, and it was considered sufficiently exact to measure the individual fish in one catch only, and assume that the average so obtained applied to all the others. This was done for the first haul and an average length of about 111 inches was obtained. As the net used had a uniform mesh of 7 inches (12 inches along each side), and the drags were short ones, no plaice of less than 8 inches in length were obtained. The size of the plaice obtained in the preserved waters of Luce Bay is in striking contrast to that of the plaice which inhabit the corresponding areas in the Lancashire and Western Fisheries District. We have no reason to suppose that Luce Bay is a better feeding ground, or differs in any essential respect from many plaice grounds in the former area. The nature of the bottom, the depth and physical condition of the water, the bottom and pelagic faunas resemble closely the corresponding condi- tions on many extensive areas on the North-west Coast of Iingland. Still, there is no inshore area known to us where 10 per cent. of the plaice caught are over 14 inches, and a fair proportion are 18 or 20 inches in length. The only difference is that Luce Bay has been closed against trawling of every kind for about 16 years, while every plaice ground off the Lancashire and Cheshire coast is the scene of an active trawl fishery, with only very limited restrictions in force. “There appears to be no doubt that the comparatively large size of the plaice on this portion of the Scottish coast is directly due to the prohibition of trawling, and conversely that the much smaller average 25 size of the plaice further south results from the practically unrestricted exercise of this method of fishing. The size of the plaice captured also suggests some doubts as to the accuracy of the generally accepted theory of the life history and migrations of that fish. It is usually stated that the mature plaice inhabits and spawns in comparatively deep water (10 to 20 fathoms), that, the fertilised eggs and larve drift inwards towards shallow water, and that as the fish grows it migrates outwards towards the 20 fathom line. The observations made in Luce Bay, where plaice of 20 inches in length were found close in towards the shore in water of six fathoms and less in depth, show, however, that the above distribution is not universal, and that there is no necessary relationship between the depth of water and the size of the fish on the bottom.* Large plaice are found in Luce Bay because trawling is prohibited there and they are not interfered with. It is, however, reasonable to suppose that the absence of mature plaice on the inshore grounds of such an area as the Lancashire and Cheshire District is due to the great extent to which these grounds have been fished over. The amount of fshing on the inshore grounds is much greater than in deeper water, and the fish on the latter area are much less disturbed. ‘The eftect of this extensive fishing inshore has been to reduce greatly the average size of the plaice present, and it is to be noted that investigations into the hfe history of this fish have been made in comparatively recent times—since the ex- ploitation of the inshore grounds by the trawlers on the modern scale has taken place. This effect of trawling in reducing the average size of the fishes present on a ground is well known, and was first demonstrated by * Our observations, however, have been confined to the months of October and November. Possibly the large plaice may migrate from the Bay in winter and during the spawning season. 26 MeIntosh in regard to certain fisheries on the east coast of England and Scotland.” Invertebrates taken in the trawl net. No special attention was paid to the bottom inverte- brate fauna, but the following forms were identified among the contents of the net :— Mytilus modiola, Alcyonidium, various compound and simple aseidians, lustra, Pecten, Asterias, Solaster, Astro- pecten, Echinus, Cucumaria frondosa, Ophioglypha, Fusus, Dentalium, Hyas, Stenorhyncus, Pagurus, Portunus, Porcel- lana, Aphrodite, Sabella and other Polychaetes, and Actino- loba. Pontobdella (from a ray) was also taken. Zostera was present in the North Western portion of the bay. A female lobster of 83 inches in length was caught in the first haul, and two females, one recently berried, 10 inches in length, were obtained in the third haul. Food of the fishes taken. The majority of the fishes were examined for food contents of the stomach. Ray were feeding on fishes (too much decomposed for identification); plaice and dabs on Scrobicularia and Nucula (especially the latter), and the soles on annelids with a few Scrobicularia. Plankton. Surface tow-nettings were taken during every haul except the last. The pelagic organisms present were, however, remarkably scarce (not more than 10 ce. in all the five hauls), and the only animals present were Plewro- brachia (relatively abundant), Caligus rapaa (male), a young Cyclopterus lumpus, some larve decapods, and the Copepods Paracalanus parvus, and Oithona similis. This is in marked contrast with the fishing operations in October, 1902, when an enormous catch of Copepods (over *See Report of the Trawling Commission, Appdx. A., p. 378, and Report, p. xvi.; 1885. 27 250 cc.) was obtained in the second drag. These consisted chiefly of Acartea discaudata, with a few Acartia clause yy 4 : and Temora longicornis. Average catches. These were greater in 1903 than im 1902, as the following table shows : — Everage:caven, oF fishes, L902) 2 ee 179: » » We LOU aye we eles re s plaree 1902 8) 2 oe ” %» pe LOGOS) Meu weet SNOT (aye iwo hauls am Wieton Bay ‘on November 9th, 1908. I. Beam Trawe of 30 ft. beam and with 4-inch meshed pockets and tails. Dragging N.N.E. for 1} hours, and for a distance of 25 miles towards Innerwell Point. 8-45 a.m. to 10-0 a.m., 1} hours’ ebb. iBlaice elie tx as 4216, Ain, to Lim, (avge. size about 9in.). Sole ee ce “Qumy WenGee see eee OU! veo Aneto Oia avete te, eee ee eA. OLN ton COIN. Sikaieweee aan cy i, ime Whiting euemerer ge gO 9S Gimeeto hun: Codling eerie tl Oe SS Gimaviior Lorn Yellow gurnard........ 1 .. 4}in. Herring ee acs. 1! hoe edt tOeeInE Poor-cod (Gadus moms ae ss) 2 et aime fo Sin: Motal aa) | 900 Hig Ua. Ey pee x/200 \) ee MY XOSPORIDIA. SE: 63 NOTE ON A REMARKABLE PARASITE OF PLAICE AND FLOUNDERS. By H. M. Wooncocx, B.Se. (Lond.). In corresponding with Mr. Johnstone about the Glugea-infection of the plaice, above described, he in- formed me of what seemed to be another Myxosporidian infection of a flounder (Pleuronectes flesus), instances of which, he says, are not unfrequently met with. In looking up the literature on parasites of flat-fish, I came across the papers by Lowe (2), McIntosh (3), and Sande- man (4), which would appear to refer to the same thing. As Sandeman practically gives the substance of MeIntosh’s two papers, accompanied by figures, a brief abstract of his note “ On the Multiple Tumours in Plaice and Flounders ” will suffice. The tumours were prevalent more or less all the year round, occurring principally from May to November, and giving the fish an emaciated appearance. The situation of these cyst-like swellings was in the skin and dermal tissue of the fins, the operculum, and the tail, usually pro- jecting externally. Sandeman does not say whether the gut or other internal organs were aftected. The little swellings are described as pearly-white spheres, not firmly attached, but loose in the connective-tissue, covered over by the pigmented epithelium, and exuding on pressure a creamy-white, structureless substance. The larger masses form tumours up to nearly an inch in size, composed of many spheres from 1 to 15 mm. in diameter, often, how- ever cuboidal or polygonal owing to mutual pressure, and eacn limited by a distinct membrane. The author remarks on their great resemblance to a mass of eggs, but admits 64 that it would be impossible for any animal to force such a quantity under the skin, as to give rise to a pedunculated tumour. (Since, as I shall presently shew, they also occur in the mesentery, this possibility is entirely nega- tived). In none, though he noticed them all the year round, could he discern any development. Sandeman apparently only examined the cysts under a low power, and judging from his description and figures, I thought it very probable that this was another case of a Glugea-infection. There is considerable resemblance between his fig. 3 (a section through a tumour of many cysts), and Johnstone’s fig. 2 (l.¢c., above), for example. In order to identify it, Johnstone kindly forwarded me a well-infected flounder from the Fisheries Museum collec- tion in the University of Liverpool, together with a drawing of the head-region, shewn in fig. 1. On see- tioning the parasites, I soon realised they were very different from what I expected to find them. The specimen was taken in the Barrow Channel in January, 1901, Both sides of the head are plentifully averaging 14-1) mm. covered with opaque white cysts in diameter—some spherical, others more ovoid. On the dorsal side, just in front of the fin, are two or three con- tiguous tumour-like masses—not, strictly speaking, tumours, however, for there is, practically speaking, no proliferated tissue, the whole thing being a mass of cysts with, of course, a little vascular connective-tissue between and around them. Solitary ones are also scattered about on the operculum, ventral fin, and tail, and they shew a tendency to aggregate along the lateral line, especially posteriorly. Under the pectoral fins an Entomostracean eetoparasite (Lepeophtheirus) is fairly abundant, but there is no connection between the two kinds of parasite. The cysts lie beneath the skin (on the upper side 65 the pigmented epithelium over them is distinctly dis- cernible) in the dermal lymph-spaces, held in place by the surrounding tissue, but not embedded in it, and they can easily be removed with only a few lymphocytes, &c., attached. They are quite absent from the somatic mus- eulature. On opening the body-cavity, numerous parasites are seen in the gut-mesentery, usually close to, but not actually in the wall of, the blood-vessels. Fig. 2 elves an idea of their appearance in the mesentery of one loop of the intestine, from which it will be seen that, when internal, the cysts are uniformly shghtly smaller than when beneath the skin. ‘They are generally oval or elliptical, and never exceed 1 mm. in diameter. Unfortunately, I have, so far, not found any younger, or different, stages, but it is most likely that the parasites, when smaller, pass into a blood-capillary or lymph- channel from the gut, and there grow and encyst (?), since in section (fig. 5) they are surrounded by a space (spa.). All the internal organs are quite free and normal, and for this reason I should not say the hosts are harmed to any dangerous extent. The two or three afflicted speci- mens which I have so far seen certainly cannot be . described as ** emaciated.” Minute structure. Notwithstanding the size the things grow to (up to 1} mm. in diameter) each is, undoubtedly, a single cell; as to that I have not the least doubt. There is no trace of cell-division, nor of cell-nuclei in the ordinary sense, in it; whatever a cyst represents, it is, as a whole, unicellular. Fig. 3 is a sec- tion, sightly magnified, through one in the mesentery, the space around representing an enlarged capillary or a lymph- channel, as already mentioned. This happened to be more spherical than the internal ones usually are; it is surrounded by a layer of amoebocytes, Kc. (lym), rather E 66 closely aggregated. (A portion of the same cyst more strongly magnified is seen in fig. 6.) The most external layer belonging to the parasite is a thick, faintly- staiming, structureless membrane, which I have denoted by (ect.). Next comes a thick zone (end.), more deeply- staming, of a finely granular nature, the greater part of which presents a most unusual appearance, and gives the organism its remarkable character. Centrally is what ean only be a nucleus (N), although of relatively huge size as in fig. 4, which is a section through another, larger, cyst, from underneath the skin. In each nucleus are several nucleoli (n), or rather karyosomes, since they retain the chromatic stain. Fig. 5 is part of the nucleus drawn under a high-power, and shews a faintly-staining, regular reticulum, which traverses a_finely-granular ground-substance, with karyosomes of all sizes, the larger being vacuolated and the smallest little more than granules. The nuclear-membrane is very thin and extremely irregular, and sometimes appears only as a boundary between the nucleus and the inner limit of the cortical region (shewn on the left im the fig. ). In fig. 6 [ have attempted to indicate the appearance of a portion of the cortex, as seen under a high power. It consists of a finely-granular matrix, staining with the plasma stain, in which are innumerable, usually separate, veticula or net work (vet.), in every variety of shape and size. These stain up deeply with chromatic stains, and, so far as I can make out, ave made up of threads of rodlets or granules, not easy to resolve. fach network is developed round a centre (which stains sometimes less, sometimes more, than the general ground-substance) ap- parently at its periphery. These structures do not com- mence quite at the external limit of the cortex and they cease some distance before its inner limit. On the whole, 67 the smaller ones are more peripherally situated, though there is no regular increase in size as one passes inwards. The only other point to note is a series of tiny spherules (sph.), each with one, or sometimes two granules, at the outer margin of the cortex, almost abutting on the mem- brane (ect.), but I have seen no transition between these and the deeply-staining reticula, nor are they obvious in all my sections. I should add that in fig. 3 these latter are more closely packed and rather more strongly-stained than in fig. 4. In endeavouring to arrive at some idea of the nature and affinities of these remarkable cysts it will be most con- venient to commence by the process of elimination. In the first place we have, certainly, not to deal with a Trematode or other Metazoan parasite. Further, Dr. Nabarro and Professor Oliver, who have kindly examined it, are of the opinion that the cysts are the result of neither a bacterial nor a fungal infection, and, indeed, it is almost inconceivable that an ordinary cell could be so enormously hypertrophied by bacterial or hyphal invasion, and retain as much of its structure as these bodies do (compare the amoebocytes and connective-tissue cells around). More- over, Mr. Pollard, of the Bacteriological Laboratory at University College, has stained sections for me by the usual methods adopted for Bacilh, &c., without result. The localized and restricted nature of the infection is also against this view, the cells around being quite normal. So that we may dismiss the idea of the cysts being caused by a bacterial or hyphomycetic parasite. Kach cyst- like body is one organic unit. I can only think of two remaining hypotheses, namely, that the bodies must represent either eggs or parasites. Now, although, as stated above, it was absolutely impossible that they were the eggs of some 6S other animal, for the simple reason that they are also in- ternal, yet it was conceivable that they represented enormously modified and hypertrophied ova, which had become detached from the genital stroma (germinal epi- thelium) when very young, had been carried about— absorbing a great quantity of nutriment which had formed the remarkable chromatic development-—and thus finally grown into these huge cysts.* Unlikely as this hypothesis might at first sight appear there were two or three points in favour of it, and I have, therefore, carefully considered it. For one thing, the resemblance between the nucleus of one of these bodies and that of a flounder’s egg is quite striking. Though differing greatly in size (and I may here say that the diameter of a cyst averages about four times that of a normal egg, and the nucleus is relatively larger), their structure is practically identical. Indeed, the nucleus reminds me more of a germinal vesicle than anything else. It is not like a Protozoan nucleus, that of a Gregarine being the only one which can be compared with it, from which this differs chiefly in relative (to say nothing of absolute) size, and in the ill-defined mem- brane, lacking any marked affinity for the chromatin stam. ‘The outermost layer (ect.) would also serve for a thick egg-membrane, but in noue of my sections is any radial striation visible, correspondimg to the “zona radiata’ of the eggs, although I. should add_ that Sandeman meutions and figures something of the kind in his deseription. The chief difference is in the cortical zone. Whereas, in an egg, the cytoplasm is filled with large, spherical, refringent, oil or fat globules, there is not the least sign of such in the cortex of these bodies *T should prefer to think of their origin thus (z.e., from differentiated ova, however small), than to suppose they had originated from wander- ing (‘‘ vagrant ’’) indifferent germ cells,—because of their single and markedly ovarian nature. In the latter case, there would more probably have resulted (by proliferation) ‘‘ cell-nests”’ of ordinary indifferent cells. 69 Whether, owing to differences in nutrition and chemical metabolism, the remarkable chromatic reticular-centres could have arisen instead, it is now scarcely necessary to discuss, for while this note was being prepared tor the printers I received from Mr. A. Scott, at Piel, another equally infected specimen, which turned out to be a male. This, of course, left me with only the parasitic alternative, as one cannot imagine such an abnormal ovarian development occurring im a male. Perhaps the chief reason why I gave so much con- sideration to the above hypothesis was because the bodies are so utterly unlike any known Protozoan. The para- site, for which I propose the name Lymphocystis johnstonez, 1s, in truth, the strangest Sporozoan (this being the only class in which it can possibly be placed) that I am aware of, and until I obtaim further stages in its life- history, I can only interpret the above-described features in very general terms. Kiet. may well represent the ectoplasm, now modified into an ectorind, while end. corresponds to endoplasm. Presumably the large nucleus is the vegetative or “ trophic ” nucleus, although in this respect Lymphocystis differs from any known Sporozoan, im that while sporulation is proceeding (for what else can the chromatic centres represent 7), the vege- tative nucleus persists undivided. In a Myxosporidian, spore-formation certainly goes on during the trophic phase of the life-cycle, but here there are many nuclei, some only of which originate reproductive-organelle, the others continuing vegetative in function. This single nucleus in our parasite recalls more the condition in Gregarines, but there the original nucleus breaks up altogether at the close of the trophic period to form repro- ductive nuclei. Nor in the Sporozoan “ lumber-1oom ” (already well filled) is there anything similar. The sole form with which Lymphocystis seems to have any point of 70 agreement 1s Lymphosporidium trutte, the cause of a brook-trout epidemic in America. In most respects this parasite, described by Calkins (1), is very different from Lymphocystis, the adults bemg amoeboid, relatively minute, and with no well-defined nueleus--the chromatin oe being in the “ distributed ” form, The two parasites are, however, not without certain points of resemblance. Lymphosporidium is, especially in the adult sporulating stage, chiefly met with in the lymph-spaces surrounding the various organs and of the dermis. Moreover, its manner of reproduction rather recalls that of Lympho- cystis. .Aecording to Calkins, deeply-staining granules collect 1m masses to form many spores. The chro- matin next forms a layer around the periphery of each such centre, and breaks up into rounded granules, eight in number, which separate (¥) to form the sporozoites. From Calkin’s figures, it does not seem to me unlikely that the complicated reticular areas in Lymphocystis (2.e. the threads of rodlets or granules above described) may represent a modification of this process, although at present one cannot say so with certainty. In that case the ultimate germs must be extremely minute (only about | or 13 uw) and numerous. Whether the little spherules at the margin of the endoplasm have any con- nection with spore-formation and are in any way com- parable to the reproductive organelle or ** pansporo- blasts ” of Myxosporidia has also yet to be ascertained. In conclusion, Lymphocystis would appear to com- bine, to a certain extent, Gregarine and Microsporidiam characters—with remarkable results. I do not feel inclined to place it in the Serosporidia (the order to which Lymphosporidium belongs), as these forms, though of similar habitat, are all very small. I have, unfortu- nately no alternative but to leave it for the present, to swell the ranks of the * unattached ” Sporozoa. BrpuioGRAPHY. 1. Caukrns,G.N. Lymphosporidium truttae n.g.n. sp. The Cause of a recent epidemic among Brook-Trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. Zool., Anz. 23, 1900, pp. 513-520, 6 text figs. 2. Lown. Fishes of Norfolk, in Trans. Norfolk and Norwich Naturalists’ Society, 1874, p. 39. 3. McInrosw. Diseases of Fishes, in 3rd Ann. Rep. Scott. Fish. Board for 1884, pp. 66-67, and 4th do., for 1885, pp. 214-215. 4. SanpEMAN, G. On the multiple Tumours in Plaice and Flounders. 11th Ann. Rep. Scott. Fish. Board for 1892, pp. 391-392, pl. 17. EXPLANATION OF PLATE. All figures refer to Lymphocystis johnstonet. Figs. 5-6 were drawn with the aid of the camera. The stains mostly used were Iron Haematoxylin followed by Orange or Hosin, Kleinenberg’s Haema- toxylin and Fuchsin, and various — bacteriological methods. Fig 1. Head of the flounder, shewing the parasites (par.) beneath the skin, but projecting ex- ternally. At tum. are three huge aggregations of cysts (not proliferations, see text). x Drawn by J. Johnstone. Fig. 2. View of one of the coils of the intestine, with ? attaching mesentery (mes.) and blood-vessels (blv.). Par. ave the numerous parasites. x 1. 7%) im Fig. 5. Section through one of the parasites in the mesentery. It is lying in an enlarged lymph- space (spa.) in the latter. Lym., a layer of lymphocytes around it, ect., ectoplasm, end. = endoplasm, ret. = chromatic reticula, NV = nucleus, n = Karyosomes. x 45. Fig. 4. A section through another, of different shape and larger, beneath the skin (only partly drawn in). Vonn.-tiss. = a layer of connective- tissue. x 45. Hig. 5. Part of a section through the nucleus, shewing the fait, irregular reticulum, and kary- osomes (7.). m = the nuclear membrane (see text). x 110-(drawn in under a high power). 3 Part of a section through the periphery of the parasite. sph = the clear spherules at the margin of the endoplasm. Other letters as in fig. 3. x 500. Zs. 3 m. Apochr. 145038 C.E. 4. ‘ con.tiss. HMWeel Fgh AS. cel, LYMPHOCYSTIS JOHNSTONEL : 73 THE FECUNDITY OF THE PLAICE. By R. D. Laurie. It may be useful to put on record two estimations of the number of ova produced by a plaice, which I made at Prof. Herdman’s suggestion while working, during last aster vacation, at the Port Erin Biological Station. The determinations were made by Dr. Fulton’s method,” in which a fractional portion of the roe (or ovary) of the fish is weighed and the ova are counted, and from the numbers so obtained, and the total weight of the two ovaries, the total number of ova present is calculated. No determinations of this kind have hitherto been made from the fish in the Irish Sea. The fishes dealt with were two ripe mature females, which died in the tanks at Port Krin during April, 1905. The data are as follows :— Total length | Total weight Total weight of (in centimetres). | (in grammes). | both ovaries. 1 | 49 (193 inches) 1,346 | 3155 y 52 (204 inches) 1,318 bet i Ges Small portions of the ovarian substance, weighing LO grains each, were taken from various parts of the organ, and the ova were counted. The results of these counts are given in the following table :— * Oth An. Report Fish. Bd. for Scotland. Pt. III., pp. 243-268. 74 (1.) Anterior region, 10 grains contained —..._ 744 ova. * ss - . a aa) eee Middle region, zs * - oe | ee 73 53 3 . ee / 2) ee Posterior region, ,, *5 is > SO 5 a Fr af x 2 ee Average for 10 grains = 1732 ova. (2.) Anterior ventral region, 10 grains contained 804 ova. is * = ay i = 189 Anterior ventral lobe, e I Fe Soaueee 2 ss 55 a - ws STO ees Middle region, a A As ra Sig 5 Esc = a Soi ss Posterior region, —... a be rs SSOnae- Average for 10 grains = 838 ova. The differences in number of the ova in the various samples were due chiefly to the mixture in various pro- portions of eggs of slightly different size, and also to the varying admixture of water and connective tissue —both sources of error which are unavoidable in this method of investigation. ‘Two kinds of ova are present im the roe of the plaice, (1) large ova lightly attached or lying freely in the lumen of the ovary, and smaller immature oya still adherent to the epithelium. In fish (2) which had not begun to spawn, I counted 492 large mature ova in one ovary; their diameter was 1:32 mm. Nearly all the remaining ova were about 1 mm. in diameter, and there were few intermediate in size. ‘This is in accord with the general belhef that the process of ripening, or the absorp- tion of fluid by the ova, is very rapid. Fish (1) had just begun to spawn, but a similar contrast between mature and immature ova was evident. 75 The following values were calculated from the figures so obtained :—— Total length. | Total weight. Total number of ova Cms. | Grms. in the fish. 1 49 1,346 | 306,278 2 o2 1,318 | 234,640 It may be useful to compare these results with those obtained by other investigators. Fulton, in the paper quoted, gives the following estimations :- Total length. Total weight. Total number of ova Cms. Grms. in the fish. i 44-5 | 1,368 223,497 2 44:5 1,191 148,470 3 52:0 ito 323,166 4 560 1,914 487,087 5 56°5 2,140 324,749 These figures present much the same appearance as those I have obtained. Reibisch,* in 1899, made a lengthy investigation of this nature. His method differed in principle from that devised by Fulton. The ovaries were put into cold ‘water on being removed from the fish and the water was gradually heated to the boiling point and kept at this for + hour. This facilitates the removal of the ova from the ovarian epithelium. ~The ova, after being separated in this way, are counted by the method employed by Hensen in the quantitative determination of plankton. ‘This is a more accurate method than that of weighing, for in the ** Wiss. Meeresunt. Kiel u. Helgoland. N.F. Bd. 4, Abth. Kiel, pp. 233-248, Taf. 1. 1899. 76 latter method a certain amount of ovarian tissue is estimated as ova, and a number of very small ova which will not be spawned at the next spawning period are also included. — In two of Reibisch’s estimations the weight of the ovaries after complete spawning was 7°8 grms. and 185 grms. By employing this method Reibisch made a large number of estimations, some of which are quoted in the following table :—- Total length in | Total weight in ‘Total number of ova Cms. | Gims. in the fish. ; | | 1 54 lo “e770 223,250 2 45 969 109,500 3 42 1,100 | 558,500 4 | 40°5 | 698 | 736,250 a | 38°5 585 250,750 | Reibisch did not count the very small eggs which are always present in the ovary. If these had been included values of 24 millions of ova would have been obtained in some cases, and this represents a degree of fecundity certainly not attained by the plaice. Such very small egos he contends cannot ripen for the next spawning period. All these results, and my own have the same tendency, show, as Keibisch has observed, that there is no recog- nisable relationship between the size or weight of the fish and the number of eggs produced by it at the spawning period. The age of the fish has in all cases to be consi- dered. We know that the rate of growth is very variable. Probably most plaice attain sexual maturity at the same age, but the size and weight at this age may be very different in a number of specimens. Thus a mature female 13 inches long, and an immature female of 19 inches, have been taken from the Irish Sea. =~] a | AN OUTLINE OF THE SHRIMP QUESTION. By W. A. Herpman. In the course of last summer Mr, Fell, the Chairman of the Lancashire and Western Committee, sent me a letter in which he suggested that it might be useful to give in this Report a detailed statement in regard to the natural conditions under which shrimping is carried on in Laneashire waters, and as to the relations between the shrimps and the young flat-fish. It is very desirable that such a statement should be drawn up, but the time has not yet come when we are in a position to do so in any detail or with any finality. Periodic investigations carried on over a couple of years, such as cannot be under- taken until we have a scientific steamer at our disposal, are necessary to clear up certain points in life-history and bionomics. Still it may be useful to give now an outline of what is known and what has still to be determined in connection with the subject, and to take what steps are possible to us during the coming year to obtain statistics which may aid us im tackling some of the unsolved problems. The subject is a very diverse and complicated one, which leads us into economie as well as scientific questions, and although one might desire that any proposed regula- tions of the shrimping upon grounds frequented by young fish should be considered and settled on the scientific evi- dence, still it can seareely be doubted that administrators will take cognisance of the economic questions even if they do not adjudicate wholly upon them. Consequently in any discussion of the subject we must be prepared to take fully into account the important mterests involved in the shrimping industry, and not to sacrifice unduly any pre- 78 sent material advantages to what may be considered some- what problematical benefits in the future. We must be prepared to give full and accurate information as to the economic effects of any suggested restrictions the effects, that is, upon the fishermen and others engaged in the industry, and upon the markets and supply to the public, as well as upon the shrimp and fish populations in the sea. We desire to know, amongst other things : (1) The number of boats and men employed in shrimping on each of the grounds. (2) The produce of the fishery throughout the year, and especially during certain periods—March to June, July to September and October to February. (5) The approximate amount of destruction of young fishes under various circumstances. (4) The subsidiary interests involved, e.g., potting and selling the shrimps. (5) The probable effect upon employment which would be produced by the imposition of a close season. (6) The extent to which foreign preserved shrimps are imported, and the probable effect of any change in restrictions upon such mmportation. In regard to some of these matters we already have a good deal of information, and can readily obtain more. For example :— Under (1)—There are now 70 boats fishing on our coasts hailing from Southport and Marshside alone, all engaged in shrimping at some time of the year. These are all half-decked boats, and most of them have been built during the last six years. The catching power of this fleet is said to be now ten times as great as was the case 25 years ago. Hach boat is worked by two men, and the takings are divided into 5 shares, of which each man takes two and the boat the fifth share. Each 79 fisherman finds one net and the boat has to find two nets when engaged in shrimping. We can readily give similar “information in regard to other parts of our coast. Under (2).-The average take at Southport during the twelve months ending December 51st, 1902, was 30 quarts per boat for each fishing day. The statisties for other boats and periods can readily be ascertained. Under (4.)--In addition to about 200 fishermen in Southport and Marshside all more or less engaged in shrimping, the potting of the shrimps is an important local industry, and provides a fair amount of work im boiling, picking and potting the catch. There are in all about 50 shrimp-potters in Southport, and.they utilise nearly all of the shrimps that are caught on our coast, and distribute them to nearly every town in Great Britain. The fishermen’s wives and children boil and pick the shrimps, and make them ready for the potters to prepare for market. During the last 15 years the South- port shrimp-potting industry has increased tenfold.» It must also be remembered that the boat-builders, net- makers, butter merchants, printers, pot manutacturers, and railway companies all share, more or less, in the pro- fits derived from the local shrimping industry. So far we have been dealing with fairly easily ascer- tainable facts, but 1m (5) and (6) we come upon contentious matters which are not strictly scientific, and in regard to which it might be difficult to get agreement. In (3) we also meet with difheulties, but of a ditterent nature. This is a scientific question, and the answer is to be obtained as the result of a large number of reliable statistics. Preeautions must be taken to see that the con- ditions under which statisties may be taken are normal and such as hold good in the course of the fishery. More- over, the practice may vary from time to time, or with 80 different boats, and so affect the result. At the best, it ‘an only be an approximation that will be obtained; but, still, it can searcely be doubted that the annual destruc- tion 1s enormous, and that the young flat-fish so lost are potentially very valuable. It seems probable that the total annual destruction of young fish by shrimping in our district 1s to be measured by the hundred million. We know, moreover, that the Lancashire shrimping grounds constitute our most valuable fish nurseries, which bear a definite and important relation to the fishing ground off-shore, and we may assume that if young fishes are allowed to grow undisturbed on the in-shore nurseries, they will later on become marketable fishes on the off- shore fishing grounds. We may state also that as all the common. flat-fish pass through a stage in which they inhabit a shallow-water area, the number of marketable fishes on the off-shore grounds will vary as does that of the small fishes in the nurseries. If, then, we are able to protect our young fishes in the coastal waters, under ordinary circumstances they should turn up a year or two later on the grounds outside. The preservation of immature fishes ought to be very beneficial to the off- shore fisheries more beneficial even than the preserva- tion of spawn, because the mortality during the period between hatching and the stage when the young fishes make their appearance im the nursery is so very great that a given number of young fishes represents many hundred or thousand times that number of eggs or embryos. Now, this a prior? argument is probably quite a good one, and if we had no other means of investigating the matter, we should probably be justified in relying upon it. But the points enumerated in the last paragraph in relation to the life-history of the fish, are eminently suit- able for biological and statistical investigation. And it 81 would be manifestly unfair to the shrimping industry to impose restrictions, and possibly interfere with the liveli- hood of so many fishermen, before making those further investigations that are practicable, and are most likely to throw much light upon the matter. We may take the probable effect of such restrictions upon shrimping as have been suggested as an instance that will show the problems that confront us, and the kind of information we want. It is interesting to speculate upon what would be the resulting effect upon the fish and shrimp populations if shrimping were either stopped or restricted to certain months on particular grounds. The number of immature fishes would probably increase, at least for a time—possibly permanently—and _ this might be expected to lead to an increase in the market- able fishes on the off-shore grounds a year or two later. The great numbers of young fish at present destroyed would be preserved, and, no doubt, the number of shrimps would also increase considerably. Interesting questions would then arise as to whether the fish and shrimps would be competitors for the same food, and whether there would be enough for both in their increased numbers. Taking the plaice as an example of the young fish, we know that when very young it feeds mainly on Copepoda —we have found their stomachs crowded with Jonesiella hyene and other allied forms. But, after the meta- morphosis, the young fishes from, say, 11 to 4 inches in length, feed largely upon worms such as Wereis and Pectinaria, upon small Crustaceans such as Mysis and the Amphipoda, and even upon small shrimps. Later on, the fish adopts its proper adult food, which is Mollusca (mainly small cockles, mussels and allied bivalves). Shrimps, we know, are general feeders (using small Molluses and other animals, and also Algw) and F 82 scavengers, and will subsist largely on dead material. Consequently, if there should be any scarcity of food, I do not doubt that they might, to some extent, compete with the little fish by eating the worms and smaller erustacea, but it is improbable that there would be any such secareity. We may put great trust in the recuperative powers of the invertebrate fauna of the sea- bottom. Even in the spots where fishes are most crowded, we bring up plenty of invertebrate food material in the dredge and trawl; and, moreover, if there were any scarcity of food the star-fishes and crabs, which are so abundant on these grounds, would move away. A greater danger might be brought about by the increased numbers of shrimps and young fishes attracting many skates, rays and other larger predaceous fishes to the ground. In fact, the disturbance of the fauna might be very wide spread. Some forms of invertebrata might be either favoured or the reverse by the changed conditions, and then that change in the food might re-act upon the fish population. For example, if the smaller crabs which are usually present in enormous profusion on the shrimping grounds, found conditions uncongenial and migrated to other banks and channels, the Gadoid fishes, which feed largely upon such crabs, might in their turn be affected. The chief enemies of shrimps in our district (see our Report for 1894) are skates and rays, whiting, gurnard, and the larger Gadoid fishes. The latter are not abundant on the shrimping grounds, but skates and rays seem to have increased on the Blackpool closed ground, possibly as a result of the more abundant feeding upon that sanctuary. a> SS a) Ie, pace ieeres ty 3 % & si o Diatoms.—1 and 2 are floating diatoms, but 3 to 6 live at the bottom. All highly magnified. Diatom Ooze.—In some parts of the sea far away from land and in very deep water (about 2,000 fathoms) the mud at the bottom is soft and white, and when ‘it is examined with the microscope it is seen to consist of nothing but diatom shells. These little plants 116 are so extremely abundant in the sea, that when they die their dead shells fall to the bottom, and form a layer of mud or ooze. The difference between an animal and a plant. Most animals have a very different appearance from plants, but in the case of diatoms, and other small creatures, it is quite impossible to tell by their appearance whether they are animals or plants. The real difference hes in the methods of feeding. An animal must live on food which is either alive, or has been alive. So animals feed on the living or dead bodies of other animals or plants. A plant lives on material which has nevet been alive —~on the carbonic acid and the substances containing nitrogen, which are in the air or are dissolved in the sea- water. Maenified about 70 dia. Noctiluca. N oetiluca.—tThis is a small animal which is always present in some parts of the Irish Sea during the summer. It is sometimes so abundant as to colour the water brown. It is simply a httle round blob of jelly-like material. It feeds on diatoms, and these will usually be 117 seen inside its body. It is one of the things which cause the phosphorescence, or “ fox-fire,” of the sea. Ceratium is another small animal which is some- times extremely abundant in the sea. It forms a large portion of the food of some small fishes. Firtu Day. Copepods.—These are the most abundant animals in the sea. ‘They are very small animals belonging to the same class as the shrimp. Many young fishes live on them, and they are the principal food of many full-grown fishes like the herring and mackerel. A Copepod.—Magnified about 45 dia. The arrow worm isa little worm about an inch long. It is nearly always found in the sea. It forms part of the food of some fishes and it is said to eat fish eggs. Other common animals found in the tow-nettings. Food of marine animals.—tEverything in the sea lives on something smaller than itself. But this cannot go on without coming to a stop, and in the long 118 run we find that the smallest animals in the sea live on the Diatoms. Thus— The Cod feeds largely on Crabs, The Crab _,, Rp} ,, Worms, The Worm ,, . ,, Diatoms. The Plaice feeds largely on Shellfish (mussels and cockles), Shellfish _,, ‘A , Diatoms. The Herring and Mackerel feed largely on Copepods, Copepods feed on Diatoms. So everything im the sea depends for its food on the Diatoms or on other plants living in the sea. The Diatoms and other plants feed on the carbonic acid in the sea water and on substances containing nitrogen which are washed down from the land into the sea. A number of pictures will be shown by the lantern on the last afternoon of the first week of the class. These pictures will be explained, and they will illustrate the work of the first week. SrxtH Day. The structure of Fishes. Skates and Rays and Dogfishes.— These fishes difter in many ways from the round fishes like the cod and haddock. Their bones are gristly, they breed in a different manner, and their gills are different. The structure of a skate—Its bramang nerves; the ear; the heart, stomach and intestine; the gills. 119 The electric apparatus of a skate; other fishes with electric apparatus. Breeding.—NSkates, rays, dogfishes and sharks breed quite differently from all other fishes. In the case of most round fishes, flukes and soles, the eggs and milt are shed into the sea and fertilization takes place there so that there is no actual connection between the male and female. But in the case of the skates, rays, dogfishes and sharks the male makes connection with the female at the breeding Flounder @ Plaice @ Halibut. Eggs of various Fishes.—All natural size. season and the milt is passed into the body of the female and fertilizes the eggs before they are shed. The eggs of these fishes are quite different from those of the other fishes. They are very much larger and they are enclosed in a hard horny case called the purse. Then most other fishes lay a great number of eggs at one time (30,000 to 9,000,000), while a skate or dogfish only lays two. But the other fishes only spawn during one or two months during the year, while the skate probably spawns during most of the year. The plaice and ‘*dab.—tThese fishes (and also the other flukes and the sole) are very like the round fishes as far as their structure and method of breeding is con- cerned. But they are flat instead of round. The coloured side of a plaice is not its back, but is really its right side. Its head has been twisted so that both its eyes appear to be on the right side of the body. The sole and solenette.—tThe solenette is often mistaken for a young sole. It never grows to more than about five inches in length. It differs in appearance from a young sole in being redder in colour and in having bigger scales. If a solenette of 4-5 inches long is opened about March, spawn will be found in it—-either eggs or milt. This shews that it is a full-grown fish. Spawn will never be found in a sole of the same size. Male and female soles. Sizes at which fishes spawn.—A fish is called mature when it spawns for the first time. The sizes at which various fishes come to maturity differ. The Plaice becomes mature at about 15 inches long. Dab a 56 6% 9) Flounder .., 6 ' 11 Sole i . hs TOUNAS . Cod 24 é ‘, 5 Opes Haddock .,, a is 1a " Whiting .., » ‘. DW ile - These are the average sizes for the females. The males are usually smaller than the females, and also produce mult for the first time at a smaller size. The sprat and herring.—tThis is another 121 case like the solenette and sole. ‘I'he sprat differs from the herring of its own size in having a row of prickles along the edge of the belly. It is a full-grown fish, and produces ripe spawn when it is about three inches long, whereas the herring does not become mature till it is over eight inches long. The eggs of the herring sink to the bottom when they are spawned. ‘The eggs of the sprat float on the surface. SEVENTH Day. The Shrimp and Crab. The Shrimp.—trhe stomach, liver, ovaries and testes. Breeding of the Shrimp.—Difference between the male and female shrimp. All shrimps carrying “berries,” or eggs, are females. The males never carry berries. All shrimps without ege's are not males however, for some may be females which have hatched out their eggs. The males are always smaller than the females, and not so numerous; but the only certain way to tell the sex is to examine their legs. The fifth pair of legs, counting from the tail, are different in male and female. Also, if the shrimp is opened up, and the generative organs examined, it will be seen that the male produces sperms, while the female produces eggs. Spawning.—The shrimp spawns twice in the year—in the late spring and in the autumn. When it spawns the eggs pass out of the ovaries and become fastened on to the legs. The mother then carries them till they hatch out, which takes place some months after spawning. When newly spawned the eggs are white, but the nearer they are to hatching the darker they become. 122 A large berried shrimp carries about 5,000 eggs. Examination of the eggs under the microscope. Also the berries will be hatched in the tanks and the newly-hatched little shrimps exanuned, The Lobster breeds in just the same way as the shrimp, except that it spawns only once in the year. Male and female lobster. The Crab—tThe stomach, liver, ovaries and testes. Three stages in the growth of the Crab. (All magnified). Ps The “Casting” of the Crab-—the shell the crab is * cast,” or thrown off, many times during the first year of its life. Afterwards it casts its shell about once in each year. Growth only takes place while the crab is “ soft,’ and before it grows a fresh shell. 1B} A female edible crab becomes mature for the first time, and produces spawn, when it is about five inches broad. Rate at which the Shrimp Breeds — The shrimp produces on the average about 5,000 eggs. If there were no destruction in the sea, and all these eggs developed into young shrimps, then starting with a single pair of shrimps— one male shrimp | . - 1st generation. one female shrimp |) The female spawns 5,000 eggs, which develop into 4000 females | - Ynd generation. and 1000 males ) 8 At the next spawning each of these 4,000 females will spawn 5,000 eggs, that is 4000 x 5000=20,000,000, and they will develop into 16,000,000 females | ard kj , - 3rd generation. and 4,000,000 males — } 3 4 At the next spawning again each of these 16,000,000 females will spawn 5,000 eggs, that is 16,000,000 x 5000 =80,000,000,000, and these will develop into 64,000,000,000 females ie Paes ea atc and 16,000,000,000 males ) °° Thus if we start with two shrimps, and imagine that they only breed once in their lifetime, and that all the eggs come to maturity, then in the fourth generation we shall have 80,000 millions of shrimps, and at the fifth genera- tion there would be spawned 820 billions of eggs. Hienrnm Day. The Cockle. Structure.Mouth and stomach, foot, siphons, gills, manner of feeding and breathing; male and female cockles. Food of cockle—tThe cockle like the mussel and oyster feeds by “suction.” It gets its food from the diatoms and other microscopic life which are present in the water sucked into the shell by the action of the gills. These diatoms, &c., are to be seen in the intestine of the cockle, mixed with a great quantity of sand and mud. Exhalent 2 = a ZY S *=74 Inhale ee Siphon Diagram of the structure of a Cockle. The Oyster. Structure of oyster heart. Manner of feeding and breathing. mouth, palps, gills, stomach, Male, female and hermaphrodite oysters. Different kinds of oysters—Deep-sea oysters, American oysters, Portuguese oysters. Tropical oysters, pearl oysters, pearls and pear! shells. Pearls in the common mussel. The parasite which is the cause of the pearls. Artificial cultivation of oysters in France. 125 Ninto Day. Fish Parasites. Nearly all animals harbour parasites. | When one animal lives attached to another, either clinging to the skin, or living inside the body, and feeding on the blood or juices of the animal to which it is attached, it is called a parasite, Thus the fish-louse found on the skin of the flounder is a parasite of this fish, and the flounder is said to be the host of the fish-louse. But the pea-crab which lives inside the shell of the mussel is not a parasite, for it does not live on the blood or juices of the mussel. It gets its food from the small animals and plants in the water which enters the shell of the mussel. The little white warts which are occasionally found on the skin of the flounder are also parasites, and not the egos of the fish as many fishermen imagine. Barnacles. Three different kinds of barnacles are frequently found by fishermen. 1. The common barnacle, or “ scab,” which grows on the bottoms of boats during the spring. 2. The ship barnacle. This does not grow in British Seas, but occasionally comes here attached to floating wreckage. 3. The crab barnacle. This is a round soft animal which is often found attached to the under side of the tail of different kinds of crabs. It is not the spawn of the crab as many fishermen imagine; if it is opened its own spawn will be found inside the body. The common barnacle and the ship barnacle are not parasites, but the crab barnacle is. It is always a female which is parasitic on the crab, and the male barnacle 1s parasitic on the female, and lives attached to it. These three barnacles are very like each other when they are just hatched. 126 In these two stages the young barnacle drifts about in the sea. After passing through stage 2 they fix them- selves—the common barnacle to stones, piles, the bottoms of boats, &c.; the ship barnacle to the bottoms of ships, &c.; and the crab barnacle to various kinds of crabs. 1—Barnacle just hatched. 2—Later stage of the same. Magnified about 60 dia. These young barnacles are always found in the tow- nettings during the early spring, and will be studied. Development of the Flounder.—the ege of the flounder just before hatching. The newly- hatched fish. When it issues from the egg, the little flounder is a round fish, hke the newly-hatched cod or haddock. When it is about six weeks old the body flattens out and the eyes twist round until they both appear to be on the same side of the fish. Up to this time the little fish swims about in the sea, but when it has become a “ flatfish ” it sinks to the bottom. 127 The Eggs of the Plaice and Newly- Hatched Plaice. “ready ce hatch. Various stages in the development of the Plaice,—Magnified 25 dia, 128 When the plaice hatches from the egg it is unable to feed, and for about a fortnight it obtains its nutriment from the food-yolk contained in the yolk-sac which is attached to its belly. Magnified 14 dia. After about a fortnight the young plaice begins to feed. The yolk has then been used up. The food of the little fish is at first diatoms and then copepods. Afterwards it begins to feed on small shellfish little cockles, &e., and then as it becomes older it feeds on larger animals such as bd “hen-pens.’ TentH Day. The work of this day will be a general review of what has been done during the fortnight. APPENDIX. MEM OLR ON ARENDOCOLA. The Fisherman’s Lugworm. By J. H. Asuwortn, D.Sc. (Lecturer in Invertebrate Zoology in the University of Edinburgh.) ConTENTs. PAGER INTRODUCTION: HABITS; VARIETIES; DISTRIBUTION ..............: 130 EXTERNAL CHARACTERS : Segmentation ; Parapodia; External Apertures ; Gills ; Sete; Epidermis; Pigment ................ 133 (EON IEVAUIET PATNUAIPOMIN a lars aiciciesys's/e'usisiala'soravare said aajeiarsioain's daislejaisieieai.ocicisoe siete « 147 IVI S CHCA AMUU TUM artes rcisiscicmeesivsteise cron sc nlgasiea ate aircon ameat nem cece sens 149 COMMOMMAND NC GWONC) HMGUTD! fe ceccceemceteemecsecisccacasaeresecanccosenee 151 ENTSIOVUBIN STAVE an © AINA nS UENO WII O° rates.) -icteistre mera chicos suicieieeisisise searisee eee 154 VASCULAR System: Heart and Heart-body .................0.0.0c0+0s 159 INGHISISA SIDI ON ogpaaaaed beneaccbaderesconas Soistseadacecnememmeeecaan oomee 5 See aareete 164 EVEN OL) Us Cimtavaiie OR GHAI Sip ete siess(s.ocee scree sleeiohow sibiele bls sine smaeind ainaiiencteen 170 Neryous System: Brain; Csophageal Connectives; Ventral Nerve-cord ; Giant Cells and Giant Fibres ..................... aly} SENSE ORGANS: Otocyst ; Nuchal Organ; Eyes; Prostomium... 179 HD) HAVA OB MIBINGT erent eerie iicc(eisisns/sainoie aac