| LIBRARY OF CONGRESS.
Chap. SY 96)
eet Ml
PRESENTED BY '
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
KG
ree DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
REHEPORTS
ON THE
DISEASES OF CATTLE
IN
THE UNITED STATES,
MADE TO THE
COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE,
WITH
ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS.
WASHINGTON:
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE,
1869.
CONTENTS.
Page
RARER 455 Mom, srs = He eee ane ee cle haw So Ota ye stot a Ses ese ee cae ne toma ee 5
Report on the Lung Plague, by Professor John Gamgee, M. D....--.----.--------- 7
Appendix No. 1.—Tabular statement of Mortality in Cattle, by Mr. John Reid.... 73
Appendices Nos. 2 and 3.—Tables of Dutch experiments on Inoculation, Ist and
POU SOTIOS = crate -teleromt= Seerswia irae ta eters Se sal ae Siete oer Oe Ne te eye sono eet sitio 74
Report on the I] Effects of Smutty Corn on Cattle, by Professor John Gamgee, M.D. 78
Report on the Splenic or Periodic Fever of Cattle, by Professor John Gamgee, M.D. 90
General remarks on the cattle diseases reported on .......-.--------------------- 162
Remarks on the Ixodes Bovis, by C. N. Riley, St. Louis, Missouri. ........-------- 168
Letter of Mr. H. W. Ravenel, South Carolina, on the Fungi of Texas...-..-.-.-.-- 169
Report of results of examinations of Fluids of Diseased Cattle with reference to
presence of Cryptogamic Growth, by Doctors Billings and Curtis, U. 8. A...---- 174
ILLUSTRATIONS.
COPPERPLATE.
Fig. 1.—Micrococcus.
2.—Bacteria.
3.—Cryptococcus, (common form.)
4.—Cryptococcus guttulatus, (Ch. Robin.)
5.—Penicillium crustaceum, (Fr. old.)
7.—Aspergillus.
8, 9, 10.—Mucor racemosus, (Fres.,) from Hoffman.
11.—Blood from splenic fever x 450.
12.—Bacteria from bile of splenic fever x 1,200.
13.—Mycelium with sporangial dilations, result of culture of splenic fever blood.
WOODCUTS.
14.—A vacuum tube.
15.—Isolation apparatus.
16.—Culture apparatus.
17.—Development apparatus.
18.—Ixodes Bovis.
st ‘ * c yo en 7 My ee ‘ Py hile
y | ‘ ; ey ie
vm” aes Bean ihe Ey ln:
iW + ‘
j 2 F ny iy ‘ Fi t 1
iy A bith wr
ta ve
i A |
) as
a ye r i
P +
.
3 i
‘ |
y — J
Ana
. ise
'
Pan i
: ( a
yj
‘ j r
' 1
Used vir
' a
F (a yy } r bi gt
* - ‘
rd \ fate oy aT
ae VE ey a tees
bee
il ye
a, a? , { eT Ae i ae
oa 2 Ae. iat ts Wises
..' ur Ewa y oat : 95 4 Wie? ile thea el mh
“J
i
*
rain .
i
rr ‘,
pie
iy Ue oy |
{ =
7 4
~ “
1 oa; ier
PREFACE.
About the middle of June, 1868, a disease broke out at Cairo, Illinois,
at a point where large numbers of Texas cattle had been landed. It
was thought to resemble the disease of the old Spanish cattle on the
Gulf coast, and was thence called “Spanish fever” and “Texas cattle
disease.” This spread into Southern Illinois and other districts in con-
nection with the grand depot at Cairo.
My attention was called to the serious nature of this disease when
visiting the fair of the State Agricultural Society at Springfield, [linois,
and I was induced to secure the services of Professor Gamgee, of London,
England, who was at the time in this country, to make a full investiga-
tion, under the following instructions:
In view of the alarming and continued ravages of the cattle disease in Illinois, known
popularly as the “Spanish fever,” and assumed to be communicated by cattle recently
from Texas, I hereby authorize you to make investigations into its cause and character,
and ascertain and report, if possible, a practicable remedy or means of prevention.
In accordance with this letter, the professor visited the districts in
Illinois and vicinity which were affected.
In the spring of this year he visited that part of Texas on and near the
Gulf coast, and, accompanied by Mr. H. W. Ravenel, of South Carolina,
an accomplished botanist, examined into the conditions of food and
general mode of life of the native cattle of Texas at those points whence
transportation began. The observations made are embodied in the
reports of Messrs. Gamgee and Ravenel accompanying.
It being desirable that some observations should be made upon the
effect of fungi entering the system of animals in producing alterations
of the blood and other animal fluids, or general deviations from health
in stock, an application was made by this Department to Brevet Briga-
dier General J. K. Barnes, Surgeon General United States army, that
Doctors J. 8. Billings and E. Curtis, assistant surgeons United States
army, might be authorized to assist Professor Gamgee in his experi-
ments upon the subject of the cryptogamic causes of disease. The
Surgeon General authorized these gentlemen to enter upon that duty,
and their report is appended. It is not to be presumed that this report
renders further investigation needless; on the contrary, some practical
points not yet reached urgently demand examination. One of these
is the best mode of arresting contagion and the proper preparation for
cattle before being transported north. To carry out this investigation
a further appropriation is needed.
6 ; PREFACE.
Accompanying these reports are two series of micro-photographs of
great beauty and value, which are not reproduced here. One is a series
of eight micro-photographs, painted, illustrative of diseased organs and
tissués of cattle laboring under pleuro-pneumonia. The second series is
a group of twelve micro-photographs of diseased tissues and organs of
cattle that have died of the Texas fever or of pleuro-pneumonia, which
latter series has been taken at the Army Medical Museum in this city,
under the supervision of Brevet Lieutenant Colonel J. J. Woodward,
United States army, from specimens of disease forwarded from various
points. An explanatory report of the pathological indications, from the
pen of Dr. Woodward, accompanies the plates, and it is to me a matter
of great regret that these portions of the work done for the Department
cannot appear with the reports in the present edition. The cost of repro-
ducing these as illustrations is so great that I have not felt authorized
to expend the Department appropriation in order that they might be
inserted here. As, however, they are essential parts of the report, and
necessary to complete the medical natural history of the diseases treated
of, it is hoped that a sum sufficient to cover the expense of engraving
will be appropriated by Congress, so that in another edition they may
be added, and the reports appear in complete form.
The rapid extension of pleuro-pneumonia during the summer of 1868,
and its increased fatality at points where cattle were collected in num-
bers, made it the duty of the Department to ascertain its nature, extent,
and the possible means of checking or wholly obliterating it. I there-
fore authorized Professor Gamgee, in the autumn of 1868, to make a full
investigation of the disease then spreading through many States of the
Union. In December of that year Professor Gamgee presented a prelim-
nary report, which was published in the monthly reports of 1868. His
final report is herewith presented.
HORACE CAPRON,
Commissioner of Agriculture.
THE LUNG PLAGUE,
BY JOHN GAMGEE, M. D.
INTRODUCTION.
The lung plague of cattle, developed alone as the result of contagion,
recedes and is extinguished wherever the people are fully informed of
its origin and nature, and measures based on such knowledge are
adopted and enforced. Americans can learn this from Massachusetts.
It is, however, the most insidious and the most deceptive of all malig-
nant bovine disorders. It penetrates and travels far and wide, where
unsuspecting farmers and dairymen are far from skilled in the veterin-
ary art. It kills, and yet there are survivors which resist all further
attacks, and in the course of time they tend to form a small but useful
nucleus of insusceptible stock, which enables the people to go on,
though in poverty, and hope for better luck. Every one strives, but in
secret, lest the publication of facts should prevent the sale and transfer
of unhealthy or infected stock. Long Island, New Jersey, Pennsylvania,
Maryland, the District of Columbia, and Virginia, furnish wide fields in
which to determine the truth of these statements.
In perusing the history of contagious pleuro-pneumonia, it will be
found that the experiences of the New World are but repetitions of those
recorded by Europeans.
In advising as to the most certain means whereby so destructive a
malady may be eradicated from this country, I have been actuated by
the belief that the diffusion of knowledge, in a form that will carry con-
viction home to every intelligent American, is the most certain means
whereby to deal a death blow to the lung plague. There are many pru-
dent and earnest leaders of the agricultural body in every State, who
can work, and will work, if armed with reliable information; and it is
my belief in this that has induced me to spare no labor in rendering
this as complete and satisfactory a record as possible, of all the knowl-
edge on the subject that is at present at our disposal. Farmers must
not be alarmed at the scientific garb which must necessarily invest such
a work. If they follow me through, without a dictionary, they will not
be left in doubt as to my meaning, and I hope not a few will rise, after
a perusal of what follows, even though they may inhabit the far distant
prairies and the mountains of California, and exclaim that it is the duty of
every American, and especially of every American farmer, to manifest
his interest in the extinction of a malady that may for centuries, if
8 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
left unheeded now, harass the stock-raisers of the entire continent, and
bring poverty and ruin to many thousands of families.
The report has been subdivided, for convenience of reference, under
the following heads:
I. Names by which the lung plague is or has been known in different
parts of the world.
II. History of the lung plague from the remotest to the present time.
IJ. Signs or symptoms by which the disease is recognized during life.
IV. Signs or appearances by which it is recognized after death.
V. How the disease is induced, with special reference to predis-
posing causes and the nature of contagion.
VI. The pathology or nature of lung plague.
VII. Medical or curative treatment of the lung plague.
VIII. Prevention of the lung plague.
NOMENCLATURE.
The popular term murrain was applied, in times past, to all fatal cattle
diseases that prevailed in an epizodtic form. The first satisfactory de-
scription of the lung plague, written by Bourgelat, in 1769, teaches us
that the malady had been known for some years in Franche-Comté,
under the name ‘‘murie.” The expression “pulmonary murrain” has
been somewhat extensively used in Great Britain of late years, espe-
cially when reference has been made to the outbreaks of the last century,
which has been considered as due to the simultaneous introduction in
the British Isles of the Steppe murrain, commonly known as rinderpest
and cattle plague, and contagious lung disease.
When free trade first admitted continental cattle and the lung
plague into the British Isles, this century, the dairyman who first
observed the now fatal foot and mouth disease at once became alarmed
at the “‘new disease,” which proved incurable. Professor Hertwig, of
Berlin, and correspondents of agricultural papers, soon enabled our
veterinarians to recognize in the “new disease” the Lawngenseuche, or,
literally, lungs’ plague of cattle, which had been studied with great
ability by the veterinary surgeons of Germany. Haller had termed it
Viehseuche, and expressed his astonishment that it had not been recog-
nized as a disease of the lungs.
German writers were so numerous that attempts were not rare to give
a scientific name to the disease, and Sauberg quotes seven Latin sen-
tences employed by different authorities in accordance with the views
of the nature and origin of the disease. They are:
Peripneumonia pecorun epizodtica typhosa—Veith, Tscheulin, Biirger.
Peripneumonia exsudativa contagiosa—Rychner, Van Hertum.
Peripneumonia exsudativa enzodtica et contagiosa—Gielen.
Peripneumonia s. pleuropneumonia pecorum enzodtica—Dieterichs,
Vix:
Pleuritis rheumatico-exsudativa—W agenfeld.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 9
Pleuropneumonia interlobularis exsudativa—Gluge.
Pneumonia catarrhalis gastrica asthenica—Numann.
Haller’s title of Viehseuche is now almost always restricted to the
Russian murrain, and the name in universal use in Germany is the
popular one of Lungenseuche, and on the title pages of monographs the
ordinary expression employed is Lungenseuche des Rindviehes. It has,
however, also been termed Lungenfiule and Krebsartige Lungenfiule.
Of the French authors, Chabert first names the malady Péripneumo-
nie, ou affection gangréneuse du Poumon. Huzard describes it under
the head Péripneumonie Chronique, ou phthisie pulmonaire, and in 1844
Delafond designated it Péripneumonie contagieuse du gros Bétail.
The Dutch called it Kwaadaardige Slymziekte, Heerschende or Besmet-
telyke Longziekte, Slymziekte, Slymlongziekte, and Rotachtige Longziekte.
In Italy it has been known by the names Pulmonea dei Bovini, and
Pleuropneumonia essudativa.
I am disposed to favor, as a popular name, that of “lung plague,” in
order to avoid any confusion with sporadic and non-contagious affee-
tions of the chest. Many years ago Mr. Sarginson, of Westmoreland;
England, spoke of it as an epizoétic influenza among cattle, and Mr.
Barlow, afterwards a much respected professor in the Edinburgh Veterin-
ary College, was among the first to draw attention to the disease under
the head Epizodtic Pleuropreumonia.
HISTORY OF THE LUNG PLAGUE.
Ancient traditions and imperfect records rather tend to bewilder those
who, from the inferences warranted by a complete knowledge of recent
events, are anxious to place before the world evidence of the laws of
nature having been immutable from time immemorial. Our ideas of
creation, and the facts bearing on the origin of all things, are too meager
to warrant us in being confident of our interpretations of the past; and
yet glimpses of light seem to promise a better understanding of even
antediluvian phenomena in almost every branch of natural history.
The assertion that plagues known now to be propagated alone by conta-
gion have thus been transmitted from the remotest antiquity, is usually
met by objectors with the declaration that the first case must have devel-
oped spontaneously. Professor Haubner, of Dresden,* accepting the
proposition, says: “It is correct that the lung plague was once devel-
oped spontaneously, for no one can suppose that Noah had it with him
in the ark.” But we can point to a contagious disease, scab in sheep,
which, if the words of the Bible are to be accepted, indicate the preser-
vation of the scab insect. it is not my desire to enter on discussions
which have no direct practical bearing, and I shall dismiss the objec-
tions of those who spare themselves the labor of inquiry after posi-
tive truth, by declaring that, so far as science has yet taught us, the great
law, that like produces like, operates in the increase of certain animal poi-
* Die Entstehung und Tilgung der Lungenseuche des Rindes, yon Dr. Karl Haubner,
Leipzig, 1861.
10 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
sons or forms of specific virus, just as in the case of other living entities
whose reproduction is undoubted. Spontaneous generation—the theory
of development by an accidental cohesion and vivifying of inert matter—
ably as it has been defended up to the present day, is fast passing into
oblivion. We are, and must probably remain, in ignorance of that final
cause which once molded and gave life to all that is living. All that
is living, however, owes that life to parents, ever since the globe became
inhabited; and there are no facts to indicate that one form of living mat-
ter grew out of another, and a totally different, form, and that there were
successive stages in the creation of animals or parts of animals. Animal
poisons are only known to us, it is true, as parts of animals. They are
undistinguishable, except from the results produced by them on the
creatures they infest, and yet they are as foreign to them as the count-
less parasites that are only known to us as abiding in the living tissues of
living beings. Indeed animal poisons may be regarded as parasitic pro-
ductions, and their difference from the more apparent types of organized
entities may be due more to imperfect means of observation than to act-
ual diversity.
Efforts are indeed being made to demonstrate the vegetable origin of
many animal poisons, and it is supposed by some that crytogamic plants,
fungi, &¢., not only approach more the nature of many forms of specific
virus, but actually constitute the contagium or active principle which
breeds and propagates in the development of small-pox, cholera, the
plagues of the lower animals, &c. There is one grave objection to all
that has yet been done in this interesting field of inquiry. The vegeta-
ble forms into which poisons are said to pullulate have not, in a single
instance, been successfully employed in the reproduction of the diseases
they have been supposed to generate.
Delafond* quotes Aristotle, who wrote his work on the History of
Animals three hundred and fifty-four years before Christ, in proof of
cattle being then known to suffer from a disease of the lungs. ‘The
cattle,” he says, ‘which live in herds are subject to a malady, during
which the breathing becomes hot and frequent. The ears droop, and
they cannot eat. They die rapidly, and on opening them the lungs are
found spoiled.”
In the collection of extracts and writings of the Greek veterinarians
made by order of the Emperor Constantine, descriptions of the lung
diseases of cattle are given which may lead us to infer the prevalence
even then of the lung plague.t
It would be simply waste of time to discuss the merits of unsatisfae-
tory hints—for they are not records—which have been traced in the
writings of Livy, Vegetius, Sylvius Italicus, Columella, Virgil, and
*Traité sur la Maladie de Poitrine du Gros Bétail, connue sous le nom de Péripneu_
monie Contagieuse, par O. Delafond, Paris, 1844.
tGeoponicorum, seu de re Rustica, Lib, XX—edited by Peter Needham, Cambridge,
1704—Quoted by Sauberg.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 11
others; hints which no doubt demonstrate that which few will question—
that pulmonary disorders have existed throughout all time.
The evidence we need is that definite record of outbreaks of a malady
marked by the leading characteristics of the lung plague. We have to
skip the age of pure quackery, when nothing but the unsatisfactory pre-
scriptions of ignorant pretenders in veterinary medicine were handed
down as valuable additions to human knowledge. A purpose is served,
however, by referring to these dark ages, when, in their blindness, men
sought to arrest the unrelenting torrents of fierce contagions by pills,
draughts, charms, and incantatioas. It makes one blush for the errors
and superstitions which, in the Old World and the New, prevail up to
the present hour. For seven and twenty years, at least, my countrymen
have, in the main, favored nothing but quackery in this respect just as
much as continental nations that suffered in ignorance did in the seven-
teen hundred years succeeding the birth of Christ. So late as 1865 the
outbreak of a virulent cattle plague in England developed in its train
the compounders of drugs and filth and the believers in the treatment
of isolated cases of a plague; of a plague, indeed, which advances in
direct ratio to the delay in extinguishing its virulent poison, and the
rapidity of whose spread may be likened to that of the confluent moun-
tain waters that form inland seas and navigable streams. Let the peo-
ple learn from the ancient history of veterinary medicine, as they can
learn from recent events, that to dam the Mississippi and annihilate its
waters is quite as easy a process as attempting to save a country from
incalculable loss by the medical treatment of isolated cases of a specific
and contagious cattle plague.
Phat is the lesson which the want of knowledge regarding the lung
plague in the first seventeen hundred years of the Christian era impresses
upon us to-day. The wisdom of that conclusion may be demonstrated
by tracing up the progress of the malady from 1693 to 1869.
The first notice, that may be declared less unsatisfactory than all pre-
ceding ones, of the ravages produced by an epizodtic bovine pleuro-
pheumonia, we owe to Valentini.* There is a fact of great importance
in relation to the history and progress of pleuro-pneumonia that writers
* Writing with but a small selection of books from my library, Iam only in a position
to give asecond-hand reference to Valentini’s observations, and theirimportance induces
me to reproduce Hensinger’s quotation: “ Preecedente hyeme pluvioso, sed in fine geli-
dissimo, sub primo vere et insolitus aéris fervor ingruebat, qualis et per omnem statis
cursum observabatur; que mutatio subitanea non poterat non inequalem et preter-
naturalem humorum et spirituum motum causare, quem et hominum et brutorum
strages insecuta est. Boves sane et vacce catervatim succumbebant, cujus rei causa
statuebatur inter alia ros corrosivus, lintea maculis plus minus luteis conspureans, et
omnino corrodens. Ex carnificum observatione plerumque phthisi pulmonali necaban-
tur, ad quam sine dubio haustus frigidse copiosior post szstum intensissumum multum
contribuere poterat. Hominibus preter dysenteriam et febres maligna sub finem Junii
et initium Augusti hic locorum infensa erat febris quedam intermittens, ut plurimum
tertiana.” Ephem. Nat. Cur. et Sydenham. opp. ed Geneva, 1, p. 276—quoted in Re-
cherches de Pathologie Comparée—Cassel, 1853,
12 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
generally have overlooked. Valentini’s remarks, incomplete as they are,
had been anticipated by numerous reports concerning the spread of the
foot and mouth disease, or epizoédtic aphthz, from east to west. As
contagious cattle diseases travel in the lines of communication estab-
lished by war or trade, so do they appear together or in succession
according to their nature, the length of their period of incubation, and
the circumstances under which the movement of cattle is conducted.
It will serve to clear up many points of doubt if this point is under-
stood. Epizodtic aphthe, or the footand mouth disease, (Maul wu. Klauen-
seuche of the Germans,) has a short latent stage of two or three days.
It moreover spreads to all warm blooded animals, so that herds infected
with contagious diseases might on their travels, as they often are, be
seized by this malady, and then the steppe murrain or rinderpest, which
has a latent stage of a week, or the lung plague which remains latent
for a month, six weeks, or more, may break out wherever signs of com-
munication between cattle of different parts have been furnished by
the rapidly-evolving and curable aphthe. The poison of one disease
does not counteract or prevent the accession of either of the two others,
and one animal may in succession have the three maladies. In Ger-
many, France, Holland, and England, the foot and mouth disease has
usually preceded outbreaks of lung disease and even rinderpest. In
America, this has not been the case, inasmuch as the voyage across the
Atlantic has usually been sufficient to purge animals of the conta-
gium of epizootic aphth, even if they had been shipped with the disease
on them, which is not likely, from its very obvious and rapid manifest-
ations.
It is necessary to make one more remark here, which may serve to
facilitate the accurate reading of the history of cattle plagues. Although
the lung plague has undoubtedly prevailed more constantly, and pro-
duced a total mortality greater than that due to the steppe murrain,
nevertheless the rapid slaughter of cattle by rinderpest at once sets
people to adopt repressive measures, and, both by killing and isolating
the disease itself, tends to supersede other cattle plagues. When it enters
a country like Great Britain, where all animals which had a slight chance
of contamination from public markets were more or less infected with
the virus of lung plague, rinderpest naturally reached those spots first,
cleared the cattle out, and extinguished pleuro-pneumonia.
Now we shall see that the history of the three maladies I have alluded
to are inmany points practically inseparable, so far as their dissemina-
tion in Europe is concerned, and this fact alone would suffice to induce
me to refer to the American outbreaks separately.
In 168687 the foot and mouth disease was noticed in Silesia and
other parts of Eastern Europe. In 1695 Valentini described the coin-
cident inflammation of the feet of cattle and aphthe in man.* And
*Sub equinoctio autumnalia, augusto decrepito, inflammatio gingivarum, linguae et
oris in hominibus, in brutis verum pedum inflammationes, obseryavi hinc inde.—Loc. Cit.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 13
thus is it established, beyond doubt, that the influences operating in the
transmission of contagious pleuro-pneumonia were at work then. Val-
entini committed the common error of attributing the lung plague to
the weather, but his reference to a wide-spread pulmonary disorder
among cattle is sufficiently distinct to warrant our dissenting from Del-
afond when he says that nothing can authorize the conclusion that the
disease described by Valentini was the pleuro-pneumonia which prevails
to-day among horned cattle.
Sauberg, whose prize essay on the lung plague is worthy of the highest
praise, draws attention to the fact that the propagation westward of
the Russian murrain, at the commencement of the eighteenth century,
directed the attention of the most learned naturalists and physicians
to the investigation of the plagues of animals, and thus a marked
influence was exerted in the development of veterinary science.
Kanold, Steurlin, Ramazzini, Lancisi, Bates, Lanzoni, Sebroek,
Fischer, Scheuchzer, Bottani, Muratori, Camper, Haller, and numerous
others, have contributed to enrich the science of comparative pathology
by references to outbreaks of epizodtic aphthe, lung plague, rinderpest,
variolous fevers, carbuncular and other diseases, which committed great
havoe up to the time that an illustrious Frenchman, Bourgelat, resolved
to establish a college for the education of veterinary surgeons. All
references to*the contagious pleuro-pneumonia are of little practical
moment until we come to the labors of Bourgelat himself. He did not,
it is true—as nobody ever did—on first studying this disease, recognize
its contagious character. He met with it in Franche-Compté, where it
had been known for years under the name of “‘murie.” He described it
as distinguished by a short dry cough, much fever, great oppression,
especially after an animal has eaten anything, loss of appetite, fetor
of breath, dryness of nose, and sometimes discharge of thick whitish
matter from the nostrils. His description of the pleuritic adhesions,
the deposits of gelatinous layers of different colors around the lungs,
the lividity and engorgement of the lungs, and distension of the chest
by a reddish, frothy, sanious, or purulent liquid, is entirely satisfactory,
and indicates how much in advance of his times Bourgelat was in his
description of this malady. As there has been a disposition to revive
the treatment of the lung plague by fumigations, I may mention that,
among other remedies, Bourgelat recommended acetic acid to be used
in this way.
The malady which had thus stationed itself in France, had also estab-
lished secure hold in other parts of Europe, and we learn of its preva-
lence in 1743 in Zurich and the adjacent cantons of Switzerland. It
continued to invade that country by importations from the grand duchy
of Baden, and in 1773 the great physiologist, Haller, published the
ablest memoir on this disease that appeared during the eighteenth
century.* He spoke of it as a lung disease, beginning as an inflamma-
*Abhandlung von der Viehseuche. Von Herrn. Alb. Haller. Bern, 1773.
14 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
tion, which passes into gangrene, or at other times into abscess and ends
ina true marasmus. “It is very wonderful,” he adds, “that among
the many modern physicians who have written on this plague, which
has been observed so generally and for so long, that they have not
noticed the seat of the disease to be in the lungs.” Haller determined.
its cause and said, “above all, we must abandon all hope that the lung
disease is not a contagious disease. * * * * * Atall events, it is
certain that in our land, as often as the lung plague has appeared
among cattle, the origin of the disease has always been traced to the
purchase of an animal from a suspected market, or to one brought
from an infected district into our land. At other times our country
people have fattened cattle with other cattle from infected parts.”
It is hard to trace the course of a disease during periods when little
attention was paid to comparative pathology. From 1774 to 1776 the
lung plague prevailed in Istria and Dalmatia.* Epizodtie aphthe made
steady inroads from eastern Europe into Austria and other parts of the
continent. From 1778 to 1784 pleuro-pneumonia, no doubt very common
in many countries, is specially referred to by Kauset and Orus as in
Silesia and Istria. Its course during this and subsequent periods was
involved in much obscurity, owing to the more alarming outbreaks of
rinderpest, which absorbed the attention of scientific men, and also
tended, by the wholesale and rapid destruction of herds, to Supersede the
more insidious pleuro-pneumonia. Huzard and Vicq d’Azyr studied the
malady in 1791, and report that in the years 1772, 1776, 1780, 1787,
1789, 1791, and 1792 it raged among the milch cows of Paris and its
neighborhood. Chabert described the malady in 1793, and recognized
its contagious character, cautioning people against placing healthy
cattle in communication with sick ones. Ioggia at that time studied
the malady in Italy, and it prevailed in Baden during the years 1787,
1788, 1792, 1794, and 1798. It is to be regretted that little or nothing
was known of this disease, which no doubt prevailed in Russia during
the last century; and we are left to draw our own inference as to its
probable prevalence there, from indications of its introduction through
Poland to Prussia, but more frequently into Austria, Wurtemberg,
Switzerland, into northern Italy and France.
Records of outbreaks during the present century are more satisfac-
tory. Boganus studied the malady in Lithuania, and Jeuen first saw
it in Russia in 1824. Haupt witnessed it repeatedly in Siberia, and
Busse observed it in the neighborhood of St. Petersburg in 1843, 1844,
1845, and 1850.
The malady invaded Prussia from 1802 to 1810, and was described by
Sick in Rudolphi’s Observations in Natural History and Medicine,
published in Berlin, in 1804. Dieterichs witnessed it from 1815 to 1820,
and Nogenfeld published in his work on the disease, official reports of
*A Fanti, sopra Vepizoozia bovina in aleuni luoghi della Dalmazia. Modena, 1776.
Heusinger also quotes memoirs of Orus and Lotti.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 15
its manifestations in the Dantzig district from 1821 to 1831. Gielen saw
the lung plague in 1832, at Blandenburg, and later, from 1857 to 1843,
in Sachsen. Sauberg, whose prize essay I have so often quoted, enters
into very minute details concerning the outbreaks of pleuro-pneumonia
in the Rhine provinces of Prussia, from 1830 to 1840. Some idea of the
extent of the losses he had to report on may be derived from the fact
that in the single district of Diisseldorf ten thousand head of cattle
were lost from pleuro-pneumonia in the eight years from 1832 to 1840.
Gerlach has drawn attention to this subject in Prussia with peculiar dili-
gence since 1835, and remarks that he has watched personally so many
cases, in conjunction with historical researches, that he unhesitatingly
pronounces in favor of the view that pleuro-pneumonia is never devel-
oped spontaneously.
The lung plague prevailed severely in Hanover in the years 1807, 1808,
1809, 1810, 1812, 1817, 1818. In 1819 Hausmann suggested and per-
formed experiments in the inoculation of the disease, which never
resulted in practical good. Outbreaks continued to be recorded in Han-
over at short intervals from 1820 to 1843, and it has never been alto-
gether free since. .
The malady appeared in Saxony in 1827, and has often raged there
since, as shown in the writings of Haubner, and the observations made
by Leisering, &e.
In 1862 I made a careful study of the progress of pleuro-pneumonia
towards the British isles through Holland, and it is from these two
countries that the New World, Africa, and the Australian colonies have
been contaminated within the past quarter of a century.
The disease entered Holland, according to Numann, the director of
the veterinary school at Utrecht, in 1833, by the importation of cattle
affected with the disease from Prussia, and purchased by a distiller,
Vandenbosch, in Gelderland. In 1835 it was transmitted from Gelder-
land to Utrecht, thence into South Holland, and it raged especially near
the great markets of Rotterdam and Schiedam. The island of Zeeland
then began to suffer wherever cattle were injudiciously imported from
South Holland, and some outbreaks were attributed to infected cattle
from South Holland, North Brabant, and West Flanders. From im-
portations of infected cattle, the lung disease attacked the stock on a few
farms scattered through the provinces of Drenthe, Groningen, and Over-
yssel. It was as late as 1842 that Friesland was attacked. British ports
were thrown open to the cattle trade by Sir Robert Peel, and the demands
of our markets caused a rush of stock through and from the northern
provinces of Holland, which infected them in this year. The first traces
of pleuro-pneumonia were observed at Nejiga and Wurms. The Dutch
government ordered the slaughter of all the infected cattle, and Friesland
again remained free of the disease until 1845. Then the British trade
again increased ; cattle were passing from Overyssel to Harlingen, and
in the month of December, 1845, the malady appeared at St. Nicolunsga,
16 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
the following March at Mirus, and soon after at Enkhuysen. Prevention,
by slaughtering diseased cattle, was enforced; the authorities in Over-
yssel were asked to adopt similar measures, that there should be no re-
newed introduction of disease from that province. The cattle trade was
too active, and no sooner was the malady extinguished in one spot than
it appeared at others. Inthe last half of the year 1847, the disease broke
out in sixteen stables in sixteen different districts. A last attempt was
made to arrest the malady, and seven hundred and three sick or sus-
pected animals were killed and buried. Larger and larger did the num-
ber of infected stables become as the cattle dealers’ movements increased.
In 1848 fifty-eight different outbreaks occurred. By 1863 between five
and six thousand out of the fourteen thousand stables in which cattle
are kept in Friesland had been visited by the disease, and the annual
mortality rose from 5.25 per thousand in 1850 to nearly 40 per thousand.
It was probably somewhere between 1839 and 1841 that some Dutch
cattle were imported into the county Cork, Ireland, by gentlemen related
toa British consul at the Hague. This was before the days of free trade
in stock, and the animals were introduced under some special permit.
Customs of this early period have their representatives in county Cork at
the present day, and my inquiries would lead me to believe that the
earliest of these importations were followed by the manifestations of
pleuro-pneumonia. It spread from Cork into Limerick in 1844, and thence
to Carlow, Kilkenny, Tipperary, Waterford, Wicklow, Meath, Galway,
and Roscommon. The losses in Ireland have been enormous, and indeed
much larger than in England and Scotland. The north of Ireland has
been more free than the south, but in 1844 cattle were imported into
county Tyrone from Glasgow, communicating the disease, which con-
tinued till 1852. Londonderry suffered about 184950, and here and
there in all other counties, not excluding Kerry, the introduction of the
malady by traveling or purchased cattle has occurred.
While the lung disease was thus lighting up in different parts of Ire-
land, it was committing great ravages in England. All the large towns
containing dairy cows suffered. Speedily did the disease pass from
London to Manchester, and Birmingham to Liverpool, Leeds, Sheffield,
and Neweastle. It was in the month of November, 1843, that English
cattle carried the disease into Scotland at All-Hallow Fair, in Edinburgh.
It speedily passed to Glasgow, Perth, and Aberdeen. In 1844 it reached
Inverness, on cattle taken there by sea. Thus the large towns and their
vicinities were first affected, but no great interval elapsed before farms
were contaminated. The counties of Norfolk, Lincolnshire, Derbyshire,
Lancashire, Yorkshire, and Northumberland were all affected by 1844
and 1845. It was later that the disease entered the breeding districts of
Gloucestershire, Herefordshire, and Devon. Cheshire lost early and
much. In Scotland it was 1846 and 1847 before many districts in such
counties as Lanarkshire and Ayrshire had the disease. It committed
great ravages in Wigtown, Renfrew, Fife, Perth, Kincardine, and Aber-
THE LUNG PLAGUE. RF
deen shires. It has been rarely, and in afew farms, in such counties as
Argyle, Banff, Inverness, and Caithness.
The losses by pleuro-pneumonia have amounted during the past seven-
and-twenty years to as high as two millions pounds sterling per annum,
in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. The best cattle
have been destroyed, inasmuch as the breeding cows and young stocks
in breeding districts beyond the range of infection never attain the value
of the fine milech cows and fattened steers which exist in milk-produe-
ing and fattening districts. I prepared a table of losses in 88 dairies in
the city of Edinburgh, from the 1st of July, 1861 to the Ist of July, 1862,
and out of 1,839 cows, 791 were sold diseased to butchers, and 284 were
sold as food for pigs. The total value of the 1,075 diseased animals when
first bought, at the very moderate average of £13 10s. each, is £14,512 10s.
There was realized by their sale, calculating the value of the 791 sold to
butchers at an average of £5 each, and the 284 sold for pig-feeding at
10 shillings each, the sum of £4,097. The net annual loss by diseased
cows in Edinburgh alone was therefore £10,415. Similar losses have
oceurred in all other large cities, such as Dublin, London, Liverpool, New-
castle, &e.
From England and Holland the disease has been propagated far and
wide. In1847 English cattle communicated pleuro-pneumonia to Sweden,
and in 1848, it appears, from Sweden to Denmark. Mr. R. Fenger, a Dan-
ish veterinarian, furnished me in 1862 with the following information:
* As to the appearance of this disease in the kingdom of Denmark, it is
an established fact that it has taken place only three times upon three
different farms where cattle had been introduced from abroad. No other
cattle were affected than those in the three herds alluded to, and for
three years no disease has appeared in Denmark. As to the spontaneous
origin of pleuro-pneumonia, I wish to draw your attention to the fact
that it is never seen in the town of Copenhagen, notwithstanding that
in this place large dairies are kept where the cows are fed on draff from
distilleries, and are kept in a state contrary to any which sanitary
rules might suggest. In the dukedom of Schleswig the disease has been
imported several times, and last from England, and occasionally has
spread rather widely. This autumn the cattle of thirty different places
in Schleswig have been kept in a kind of quarantine.
In 1858 an agricultural society in Oldenburgh puchased some Ayr-
shires to distribute among its members for breeding purposes. Wher-
ever these animals went they communicated disease. Oldenburgh has kept
very free from pleuro-pneumonia from the activity with which the infected
animals are destroyed at the outbreak of disease. The same remark
applies to Mecklenburg-Schwerin and Schleswig-Holstein. With regard
to the latter province, it transpires that in 1859 some Ayrshire cattle im-
ported in the vicinity of Tondern communicated pleuro-pneumonia.
In the month of August, 1860, an agent of the Norwegian govern-
ment purchased a number of Ayrshire cattle; they were taken to the
2
ad
18 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
Royal Agricultural College at Aas, and in the commencement of Novem-
ber pleuro-pneumonia broke out among them. Dr. Oluf Thesen has
informed me that he limited the disease to the college, by destroying the
native cattle with which the Ayrshire stock had come in contact, and
keeping the Ayrshire animals to themselves. Norway had been exempt
from this cattle plague, and owing to Professor Thesen’s activity it now
enjoys the same immunity.
In the month of September, 1858, Mr. Boodle, farmer, near Melbourne,
imported a cow from England; she landed in good condition and gave
milk. She died of pleuro-pneumonia six weeks after her arrival. Two
other head of cattle belonging to Mr. Boodle died in December and
another in January. The disease continued to spread, and the losses
have been enormous and almost incessant in Victoria and even in New
South Wales.
HISTORY OF THE LUNG PLAGUE IN AMERICA.
The first notice of the lung plague in the United States dates back to
1843, when a German cow, imported direct from Europe, and taken from
shipboard into a Brooklyn cattle shed, communicated the disease, which,
it is said and believed, has prevailed more or less in Kings county, Long
Island, ever since.
In 1847 Mr. Thomas Richardson, of New Jersey, imported some Eng-
lish stock. Signs of disease were noticed soon, and the whole of Mr.
Richardson’s stock, valued at $10,000, were slaughtered by him to pre-
vent an extension of the plague.
In 1850 a fresh supply of the lung-plague poison reached Brooklyn
from England in the system of an imported cow.
Mr. W. W. Chenery, of Belmont, Massachusetts, has related the his-
tory of the introduction of lung plague from Holland into Massachu-
setts in 1859. Four cows were purchased for him at Purmerend and
Beemster, shipped at Rotterdam early in April on board the bark J. C.
Humphreys, which arrived in America on the 23d of May, 1859. Two
of the cows were driven to Belmont; the other two had to be trans-
ported on wagons, owing to their “extremely bad condition,” one of them
“not having been on her feet during the twenty days preceding her arri-
val.” On the 31st of May, it being deemed impossible that this cow
could recover, she was slaughtered, and on the 2d of June following the
second cow died. The third cow sickened on the 20th of June, and died
in ten days. The fourth continued in a thriving condition. A Dutch
cow, imported in 1852, was the next one observed ill, early in the month
of August following, and she succumbed on the 20th. ‘Several other
animals were taken sick in rapid succession, and then it was that the
idea was first advanced that the disease was identical with that known
in Europe as epizobtic pleuro-pneumonia.” Mr. Chenery then did all in
his power to prevent the spread of disease from his farm. The last
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 19
cease at the Highland farm, Belmont, occurred on the 8th of January,
1860.
In June, 1859, Curtis Stoddard, of North Brookfield, bought three
young cattle, one bull and two heifers, from Mr. Chenery. One calf
showed signs of sickness on the way home. Leonard Stoddard, father
of Curtis, thinking he could better treat this sick calf, took it to his own
barn, where he had forty-eight head, exclusive of calves, and with which
the calf mingled. One animal after another was attacked, till the 12th
of April, when thirteen head had died, and most of the remainder were
sick. The disease continued to spread from farm to farm as rapidly
as circumstances favored the adinixture of stock. The period of incu-
bation in well-defined cases varied from nineteen to thirty-six days, and
averaged twenty-six and two-thirds days.
The people of Massachusetts, a little slow at first, overcame the delays
incident to legislation, established a commission for the purpose of exter-
minating the disease, and an appropriation of $10,000 was placed under
the control of the commissioners on the 4th of April, 1860. The disease
was gaining ground rapidly, and a bill to extirpate the disease passed
its several stages and was approved on the same day. Commissioners
were appointed; herds were examined by surgeons, and, if infected,
slaughtered; the animals pronounced healthy at the time of inspection
were paid for; all the money appropriated was spent, and such was the
feeling then in Massachusetts that private gentlemen made themselves
responsible for a second amount of nearly $20,000. An extra session of
the legislature met on the 15th of May. Fresh powers were sought and
obtained, additional commissioners were appointed, and the disease was
apparently exterminated. It reappeared in 1861, anew board of commis-
sioners was appointed, and further successful efforts were made to prevent
the disease. On the 24th of December, 1863, Mr. Charles L. Flint, in a
letter to Governor Andrew, asserted that pleuro-pneumonia still existed
in twelve or fifteen towns of the commonwealth of Massachusetts. Mr.
K. T. Thayer, to whom the people of Massachusetts owe much for his
skill and industry as the veterinary commissioner, and Mr. Charles P
Preston, wrote their final report to the senate and house of representa-
tives of Massachusetts on the 30th of December, 1867. In that report,
in tendering their resignations to the governor, they congratulate the
people on the suecess which had been insured by efficient co-operation
“in eradicating one of the worst forms of contagious disease which has
been found among cattle.”
From numerous inquiries there is not the slightest doubt in my mind that
the lung disease has continued, ever since its first introduction, to attack
some of the numerous dairies on Long Island. One of the best informed
dairymen in Brooklyn informed me that, three months after starting in
business sixteen years ago, he lost eleven out of twelve cows he had
purchased in Newark, New Jersey. He bought more and began to
inoculate with excellent results. Other people were losing, and he
20 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
established himself on Jamaica Pond to be clear of every one. When
he stopped inoculating the disease reappeared. Mr. Benjamin Babbit,
of Lafayette avenue, was the first to inoculate after the introduction
of this practice in Europe, and many dairymen adopted it. The board
of health opposed the practice, as many of the cows lost portions of the
tail, and reports were made of blood and matter finding their way into the
milk-pail. The disease has never ceased, and I have visited many dairies,
in all of which at one time or another, and in most of which during the
present year, the disease has prevailed. In five dairies I examined, within
one hundred yards of each other, I found one or two sick cows in each.
The Hartford Insurance Company, which has recently suspended opera-
tions, lost heavily on the insurance of cows from the prevalence of this
disease, and that company objected also to the practice of inoculation.
From Mr. Bedell’s statement, there is no doubt of the existence of the
contagious pleuro-pneumonia in New Jersey when he first bought his
cattle. Mr. Robert Jennings, veterinary surgeon, had his attention
drawn to the disease on its appearance in Camden and Gloucester coun-
ties, New Jersey, in the year 1859. In 1860 it crossed the Delaware
river into Philadelphia, spreading very rapidly in all directions, partic-
ularly in the southern section of the county known as “The Neck”—
many of the dairymen losing from one-third to one-half of their herds.
The sale of sick cattle continued, as it always does, unless prevented by
rigid laws. In 1861 the malady appeared in Delaware, and in Burling-
ton county, New Jersey, and the disease could be distinctly traced to the
Philadelphia market.
The records of outbreaks are by no means satisfactory, but a gentle-
man well known in Maryland, Mr. Martin Goldsborough, informs me that
the malady has been very destructive on many farms of that State for the
past three years. Individuals have lost their entire herds, in some cases
numbering twenty-four, thirty, and as high as forty-seven head. Last year
an effort was made to direct the attention of the legislature of Maryland to
the subject, with a view to the adoption of successful measures, but with-
out effect. Mr. Goldsborough’s statement is to the effect that the disease
in Maryland is due to the purchase of cattle in the Philadelphia market.
There is no doubt of the great prevalence of the malady for some years
in Pennsylvania. J have seen it on two farms in Delaware county, and
it has been on several others recently. Bucks county has suffered much
for two years. A correspondent informs me that in March, 1867, a drove of
cows was taken into that county, and one of them was observed to be sick.
These animals were distributed among the farmers, and soon the plague
appeared in all directions. An effort was made then to secure the aid of
the State legislature, without effect, and to this day the disease is in
Bucks county. The last case I have to report is at Newtown, Bucks
county, where the disease was introduced by cows bought in the Phil-
adelphia market.
That the malady has attained such proportions as to demand constant
THE LUNG PLAGUE. at
attention, apart from the fact that but one case on the whole continent
is a source of incalculable danger, is proved by a circular recently issued
by gentlemen in Westchester, Pennsylvania, and which is of sufficient
importance to be reproduced here :
Pleuro-pneumonia.—The great increase in the disease known as pleuro-pneumonia
among cattle within a few years past, its highly contagious character, and the acknow-
ledged inability of the most skillful veterinary surgeons to control or in the least miti-
gate its severity in certain stages of the disease, calls for immediate and earnest atten-
tion from the community. It is a well-known fact that the cupidity of many induces
them as soon as the disease develops itself on their premises to hurry off their stock
(diseased as well as those not diseased) to the nearest drove-yard, to be there sold for
whatever they will bring; to be either sold as food or driven off to new sections, and
there to infect and poison other animals with which they may come in contact.
With the view of arresting this increasing and wide-spreading evil, the undersigned,
a committee of the “Mutual Live Stock Insurance Company of Chester county,” an
institution established purely for mutual assistance and protection, respectfully invite
your co-operation in procuring such action at the hands of our next legislature, by the
passage of a law authorizing the appointment of a suitable number of qualified and con-
scientious inspectors throughout the State, whose duty it shall be to examine thoroughly
all animals, especially those offered for sale, wherever they may be; and subjecting
those offering such diseased animals to both fine and imprisonment, and to take such
other measures as may be deemed necessary to effect the entire extirpation of the dis-
ease from our midst.
I can corroborate the statements made as to the sale of cattle that are
infected. Not only has this occurred often where the disease has been
most rife for years past, as on Long Island, but recently, in making
inquiries in Delaware county, Pennsylvania, I learned of three cows
which had been sold “healthy” (?) out of an infected herd. Such a prac-
tice explains the progress of the disease even further south than Maryland. |
I have been informed that the malady has traveled as far west as
Kentucky and Ohio, but of this I have not been enabled in the brief tine
since I commenced the inquiry to obtain satisfactory evidence. I have
taken some pains to ascertain if the disease had reappeared in Massa-
chusetts, and personal inquiries in various parts of the State show that
it is quite free from the disease, thanks to the energy of its people and
the enlightened action of its legislature.
The conclusions that are warranted by the facts 1 have gleaned are as
follows:
First. That the lung plague in cattle exists on Long Island, where it
has prevailed for many years; that it is not uncommon in New Jersey ;
has at various times appeared in New York State; continues to be very
prevalent in several counties of Pennsylvania, especially in Delaware and
Bucks; has injured the farmers of Maryland, the dairymen around Wash-
ington, D.C., and has penetrated into Virginia.
Second. That the disease travels wherever sick cattle are introduced,
and that the great cattle-rearing States of the west, which may not at
present be entirely free from the disease, have been protected by the fact
that they sell rather than buy and import horned stock.
Third. There are no proper restrictions on the sale of infected stock,
°
22 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
and in another year or two, unless some definite and immediate action
shall be taken, the disease is likely to find its way into so many parts of
the country that its eradication will be almost a matter of impossibility.
Of all the cattle diseases pleuro-pneumonia is in the long run the most
destructive, because the most insidious and the least likely to rouse a
people to united action for its effectual suppression. To ignore its pres-
ence is, however, to insure that the cattle mortality of America, like
that of England, will be at least doubled within a few years. Rational
means, energetic action, and earnest co-operation between the different
States and the central government, may, with a moderate expenditure
now, save many millions annually in the not distant future.
For three years past the city of Washington, and, indeed, the whole
District of Columbia, with adjoining parts of Maryland and Virginia,
have been seriously affected with the lung plague. It is gleaned from
the contractors who clean the city of the carcases of dead animals, that
it is not uncommon to have several dead cows in a day from the Wash-
ington dairies; that a dozen a week has not been unusual, during cer-
tain seasons, and that the supply is constant. Unfortunately, as in other
cities of America and Europe, the prevalence of pleuro-pneumonia results
in a wholesale traffic in such animals. Sick cows are sold to butchers, and
if in good condition command thirty to sixty dollars; others that are
too lean are taken in the early stage, mixed with other stock, and sent
by railroad to Baltimore, to be sold as stock cows to farmers. In fact,
the active and unremittent traffic in sick cattle insures that Washington,
theneighborhood of Alexandria, in Virginia, and Baltimore, will continue
to be great breeding centers of pleuro-pneumonia. Some idea of the heavy
losses in the Washington district may be gleaned from an annexed table,
prepared by a Washington dairyman. (See appendix at close of this
report.)
SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS DURING LIFE.
It is necessary to draw special attention to the fact that in States or
on farms where the lung plague has never before existed it is the more
readily recognized, in the earlier stages, as in case of other epizootics,
the more complete the history. The fact that cattle have been recently
purchased, or that drift cattle have crossed the farm or prairie, the
knowledge of the existence of such a disease in adjoining States or
farms, or of sick cattle being sold by auctions or in the markets, are all
most important elements in guiding to a correct conclusion as to the
nature of the disease.
Very frequently an animal is bought, placed among others, dies, and
the remaining cattle cough, get out of condition, and some soon sicken.
The purchased animal may show no signs of illness however; it may be
suffering from a latent form of the disease, or it may be in the conyales-
cent stage, and gaining flesh daily.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 24
A dairyman, especially in a large town, may have had pleuro-pneumo-
nia among his cattle, which had subsided, and his stock, composed of
animals that had withstood the disease, might be regarded as healthy.
But some still discharge a degree of poison and infect the atmosphere,
and a newly bought animal dates the period of the incubation of the
malady from the moment it entered the stable.
The incubation of the disease may be said to vary from eight or nine
days to three or four months. In the inoculated malady the exudation
commences sometimes as early as the fifth day, more commonly about
the ninth or twelfth, and it may be as late as thirty and forty days. In
the disease communicated by cohabitation a cough, to which very special
attention was drawn by the experiments of the French commission on
contagion, supervenes about the ninth day and later. It is usually
noticed by cow-feeders, who buy cows which have just calved, that they
drop with the disease about the time they should manifest cestrum, that
is to say, six weeks after their admission. »
There are false and true periods of incubation of the lung plague,
and this has been overlooked too much in descriptions of the disease.
The actual incubation is from the period of contamination, by contact or
inoculation, to the moment that a special morbid change commences.
Our means of observation have not been exact enough, and it is very
desirable that thermometric observations should be made on experimental
animals, and these, with the ordinary phenomena derived by auscultation,
&c., will assure us of the actual length of the stage of the lung disease
which is unattended by any appreciable sign. We shall then know the
true period of incubation. The false periods of incubation are those
derived by persons from observing an animal to sicken, say four months
after purchase, and drawing the conclusion that that represents the in-
cubation stage. As arule in such a case two or three latent instances
of the disease have preceded the obvious one. Then, again, the period of
incubation is not usually stated correctly by farmers, as they overlook
the first signs of the disease, which occur several days before cessation
of appetite, secretion of milk, &e.
Invasion of the lung plague is characterized by local phenomena which
most frequently show themselves by the cough already referred to.
With one of Casella’s self-registering thermometers it will be found that
in an infected herd some animal or animals in apparent health, which no
one suspects to be diseased, will manifest a temperature of 104° or 105°
Fahrenheit. I have never seen a case in which, when the temperature
was thus elevated, I could not detect friction sounds, loud respiratory
murmurs, especially at the lower part of the trachea and involving one
lung. It is not a little remarkable to notice the want of faith of some
persons who watch the separation of such cattle, with great doubt as to
the correctness of the observation. In rinderpest the elevation of tem-
perature occurs before all other signs, and to a less marked extent this
is the same with splenic fever; but in pleuro-pneumonia there is reason
24 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
to believe that acute observation would reveal first the local change
and then the fever.
In order to show the value of the thermometer in this disease, I sub-
join the observations made by me on two herds of cows suffering from it,
and which I inoculated on the 26th of February, 1869, at Alexandria:
MR. REID’S COWS. MR. BIEMULLER’S COWS.
No. Fahrenheit. No. » Fahrenheit,
Hihs 2 sad Getler: Lal Moe 88 LO ST seh ee cee eee eae mimee Chl eee 101.4
Dp ae ieee. oi a dep. 8 TORS Hy) QS wy Aa eR eee 102
Rei Mitel cad toed aby edi ok ars A hae TODSGHL, #3) 18 lee ee hs Se a eh ae a 102
Ati ae ny Mee CRN eel Serge DOD A || pe 5 vn cache Fie Bae ode dae ee 101
LAE SERNA SPUN SONS MOORE RIDIN Sh PE 101 Lee Rage) NETRA ie ona 101.6
(CRE eRe stir Dee oer epee Rise p lero Beye 102.2 02 ete eee ete aol ne ee 102.3
[pose § SPORE EAB ALL decel bages tal he 102 ON ore ORT ee oe 102
Cees EATS CED 101.8 BL AAR LRA We. OF CE ah RAL 101.8
Oeste uy tes a Bega wey Ayal Byes 102 Ot ah Aen here 104.4
TO) Sess a Se Senn aR nT ae ARTE ge a O58 SiO bs asp tlt pg. ly i ee a 102.6
Lb Pare ga Coe, te Seah eee. OO eee We POO ices ne ele a Re aah a 101
11 asp hhc lee Nac nur Visiige cova Yea hing 0 De Ne i elit eee acts ae 102
1 Les al hee ea me yaad AINE 6 OS | TS cee ees | ae ee 101.6
TARE Dae le. sell tS ebay. LOB) yig hee! «Sieve acai LOPES ieee ee 105.6
Sep SP i ne DVN gg ey Boy Ta ee 10056;|| 1bteexe lh: Ro Bele 103.6
UG ee ee ee Onan eee Aes 8 | iG ser tes lh. 3 A uci ook ear ee 101.3
11a EE the: SNe OO ea 102.2 | Vos oe ek oe 101
TISkuesé, . Sees A ies bi plac Abia a TOT il AS esses fo yo ee ee 101.3
L1G acai i La del nd Sate hdl le LOZIG NAG eee eee eee 104.4
Oe neh nar LAS Pe AES LE 101 GO th: POR IG Pek RI eG ke 102.2
Ost erate! uaa Sie ihe) ay eh eR eoe ial 101
Of Reid’s cows, Nos. 11 and 14 were sick, and of Biemiiller’s, Nos. 9, 14,
15, and 19. Some doubt exists as to No. 19; I had not opportunity of
seeing her again. Mr. Reid thinks she might have been at heat, but
from the indications, however slight, associated with the elevation of
temperature, I believe it was one of the numerous latent cases which the
thermometer alone reveals to us. Nos. 14 and 15 were in the earliest
Stage of the malady, and both grew worse, suffered for three weeks, and
then recovered.
OBVIOUS PREMONITORY SIGNS.
The obvious premonitory signs are shivering fits, as in ordinary fever,
but their transient and mild character lead to their often being passed
unnoticed. The animal's coat looks dull, staring, and the skin is often
rigid. An occasional cough of a dry and harsh character is noticed,
and, when inspecting a herd in a field, if the cattle are made to move
briskly, several will be found to cough. For some days the cattle appear
to thrive well, and milch cows yield a copious amount of milk. It has
been remarked that they appear full—indeed fuller in the early morning
than other animals which, like them, had not fed since the previous
evening. The excrement is dry and urine somewhat scanty.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 25
An expert dairymaid in the habit of milking cows where the disease
prevails is apt to notice, as the malady declares itself, that there is some
stiffness, and the milk is not so freely drawn as usual. The quantity of
this secretion then diminishes.
The progress of the malady is then characterized by loss of appetite,
altered gait, segregation of the sick from the healthy in the field, the sick
standing with their elbows turned outward, their feet drawn forward,
neck and head extended, and nostrils somewhat convulsively expanded
at each inspiration. There is quickness of breathing, especially if the
animal is even slightly disturbed, and on the slightest movement there
is an audible grunt. The expression of countenance indicates uneasiness
or absolute pain, and the eyes are prominent and fixed. The pulse rises
to seventy, eighty, and even one hundred beats per minute. In hot cow
sheds the pulse is more frequent than in the open field in healthy cattle,
and a corresponding increase is seen in this disease under similar cir-
cumstances. The respirations rise to thirty-five and forty per minute,
are labored, audible, and each expiration is often associated with a short
characteristic grunt. This grunt is especially marked if the sides of the
chest or the spine are pressed; and many years ago Lecoq showed that
graziers regarded this as a decisive symptom of the malady. A some-
what watery discharge from the nose, increased in the act of coughing,
is noticed early in the disease, and driving sick cattle in the earliest stage
produces much thirst, and there is a ropy saliva discharged from the
mouth. The muzzle is hot and dry.
Cattle suffering from this disease are readily identified as it advances
by persons having seen a few cases. They stand motionless, with pro-
truding head, arched back, extended fore limbs, with elbows turned as
far out as they can be held, and the hind limbs drawn under them, with
knuckling at the near hind or both hind fetlocks. When lying, especially
in the latter stages of the disease, they rest on their brisket or lie on the
affected side, leaving the ribs on the healthy side of the chest as much
freedom of motion as possible.
As the disease advances the pulse gets more frequent and feeble, and
the heart’s beats, which are at first subdued, become marked and palpi-
tating, as in cases of poverty or anemia. The membranes of the eyes,
mouth, and vagina are usually pallid, though the membrane of the nose
is often red. The tongue is foul, covered with fur, and the exhaled
breath has a nauseous and even fetid odor.
Listlessness, grunting, grinding of teeth, diminished secretions, weak-
ness and emaciation, increase with the progress of the malady. The
animals getting weak, lie more. They sometimes show symptoms of
jaundice, have a tendency to hove or tympanitis from gases accumulating
in the paunch, and their gait is so staggering that they appear to suffer
from partial paralysis of the hind quarters. As all these aggravated
symptoms declare themselves the pulse gets weak, and often rises to one
hundred and twenty per minute; the breathing gets more frequent and
26 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
labored; the animal gasps for breath. The spasmodic action of the
nostrils is very marked, the grunt very audible, and there is a peculiar
puckering of the angles of the mouth. The temperature, which is ele-
- vated during the acute stage of the disease, is irregularly up and down,
according to the complications of the disease, and there is great tendency
to coldness of the horns and extremities. Abortion is not an uncommon
accident. The constipation, which is a very common symptom of the
lung disease, is apt to be followed by diarrhea in the later stages, and
this is also associated with a considerable discharge of clear-colored
urine.
Auscultation and percussion are valuable aids in the diagnosis of lung
plague. Most persons can, with a little care, distinguish the sick from
healthy cattle by listening to the sides of the chest. It does not requiré
a skillful expert to recognize that the ribs are motionless and flattened
over the consolidated lung, that there is an absence of resonance on
striking the ribs over the affected region, and that the ear distinguishes
a very distinct respiratory murmur wherever the lung is pervious, and
an absence of this sound where the lung is transformed into a solid mass.
At an early stage of pleuro-pneumonia there is a harsh sound, roar, or
rhonchus, produced by the passage of air through the windpipe and its
subdivisions. This varies in intensity in different cases, as some animals
have more exudation on the mucous surface of the air passage than
others, and the leathery-looking shreds of lymph adhering to the inflamed
membrane vibrate as the air rushes past them and give rise to the harsh
sound which may sometimes be heard by persons standing by a sick ani-
mal. In many cases one lung alone is affected, and then the respiratory
murmur is more distinct than in health, wherever the lung tissue is per-
vious, whereas there is a total absence of sound over the consolidated
organ. Occasionally an air passage remains open through a mass of
hardened lung, and the air rushing through this rigid bronchial tube
makes a very decided whistling noise.
In the earliest stages of pleuro-pneumonia the deposit of lymph on the
serous covering of the ribs and lungs produces a leathery-friction sound,
and as liquid accumulates in one or both cavities of the chest the respira-
tory murmur is lost towards the lower part of the affected side or sides,
and it is alone distinct over the upper portions of pervious lung tissue.
A careful examination of the chest reveals day by day the progress of
the disease. When one lung is affected an animal is much more likely
to recover than when both are diseased. Portions of the diseased lung
tissue are apt to die, and becoming detached or softened, produce cavi-
ties in the lungs, which are indicated by a cavernous rale or sound some-
what similar to that produced by blowing air in the hollow of the hands
when closed against each other.
By careful auscultation the eases that tend to convalescence may be
distinguished by less marked roughness in the inspirations, and a gradual
THE LUNG PLAGUE. i
though slow return of the respiratory murmur, with increased mobility
of the ribs and easier movement of the flanks.
TERMINATION.
Cases of lung diseases in cattle end in partial or complete restoration
to health, or death by prostration, suffocation, purulent fever, or hectic.
As a rule, when a herd of cattle: has suffered from the contagious
pleuro-pneumonia, the surviving animals, whenever slaughtered, show
old adhesions, partial collapse of the lung tissue, atrophy or wasting of
the lung, thickness of the heart’s covering or pericardium, and sometimes
chronie abscess.. Complete recovery without leaving the slightest traces
of pre-existing lesion occurs. It has been noticed that cattle that have
once had pleuro-pneumonia fatten more readily than others.
Death supervenes during the acute attacks of the disease from shock,
prostration, or gradual suffocation. When animals linger on for some
time in the bloodless state peculiar to this disease, and which is mainly
due to the great drain on the system by the immense discharge which
occurs in the substance of the lung and cavities of the chest, a perma-
nent impairment of the functions of nutrition or assimilation occurs,
and although the appetite may be partially restored, emaciation advances,
and the animal sinks. A terrible diarrhea or dysentery usually accom-
panies this form of disease.
In other cases abscesses form in and around the lungs and in other
parts of the body, and the animals die of purulent infection. Occasion-
ally a cavity formed by the breaking up of diseased lung tissue commu-
nicates with the pleural sac or cavity of the chest, and a condition known
to pathologists as empyema results, to the certain destruction of the
animal.
- DURATION OF THE DISEASE.
Affected animals usually pass through an incubative stage varying
from twenty to eighty days, and usually averaging from twenty-five to
forty days. The acute stage of the disorder varies from seven to twenty-
one days. Convalescence extends over a period of one, two, and even
three months, during the greater part of which the convalescent animal
is often capable of infecting healthy cattle.
The mortality varies from one to ninety per cent. of the affected ani-
mals. When a first case is isolated early, all the remaining animals may
continue to enjoy health. As a rule, in mild outbreaks, the mortality
obtains twenty-five per cent., and in severe cases sixty, seventy, eighty,
and even one hundred per cent.
In England the lung disease has doubled the usual cattle mortality of
the country, and during many years fifty per cent. of the cattle that
have died of disease have died of the contagious lung disease.
28 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
LATENT FORM.
It is necessary that I should draw special attention to the large num-
ber of cases which run an insidious course and pass unobserved. These
are the most dangerous, as less care is paid to their isolation.
APPEARANCES AFTER DEATH.
Animals that are slaughtered, or are permitted to die in advanced
stages of the lung plague, present the following characteristics:
The internal changes are confined almost entirely to the chest. On
opening this, by splitting the brisket, as the animal lies on its back,
layers of yellowish, friable, false membrane, of varying tenacity, stretch
across around the sae (pericardium) containing the heart. These adhe-
sions exist on one or both sides of the chest, and are sometimes alto-
gether absent. They are found bathed in a yellowish, grumous fluid or
serum, highly charged with albumen and shreds of solid deposit. Por-
tions of one or both lungs are found more or less firmly adhering to the
membrane (pleura) covering the ribs and diaphragm, and in passing the
hands, especially round the large posterior lobes of either lung, it is
difficult, in advanced stages of the disorder, to detach the diseased por-
tions of the organ from the ribs.
The false membranes, disposed in layers which may be stripped off
the pulmonary surface, are found adhering more or less closely to it, and
the membrane (pleura) covering the lung, which is usually smooth and
glistening, is rough, of a mottled color, and with more or less marked
papillary or warty-looking eminences. These are the vascular offshoots
of the membrane feeding the deposit around, and in time the process of
growth and formation of vascular or blood-carrying tissue may lead to
as solid a connection between the lung and the sides of the chest as
between healthy tissues. Such complete development is only seen in
very chronic cases, or animals that have recovered from the disease.
The fluid around one or both lungs varies in amount from a few ounces
to several gallons. At times itis tolerably clear when warm, and gelatin-
izes on cooling. At others it is difficult to separate it from the shreds
of lymph and false membranes in the meshes of which it is held. Pus
cells frequently abound in it, and it assumes in a few cases the character
of pus. It is especially purulent when abcesses have formed in the gan-
grenous lung tissue, and an opening has led to communication between
the lung tissue and the pleural sac. Under these circumstances, the
fetor noticed on opening the chest is intolerable.
On removing the lungs, great variations in extent, but uniformity in
essential appearances, of disease exist.
In recent and mild cases, one lung is found affected. Its surface may
be smooth from the absence of deposit around it. Parts of the organ
are collapsed, as in health, and the usual normal pink color is noticed.
The affected part is swollen, hard, and mottled. On cutting into this,
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 29
the older. diseased portions present a very peculiar marbled or tesselated
character. The substance of the lobules is solid and of a dark red color,
and the tissue between the lobules is of a yellowish red, more or less
spotted with red points, but sometimes of almost pure yellowish white
color.
The more recent deposits are distinguished mainly by a lighter red
color of the thickened lobules, and there are gradations from this con-
dition to that in which the lobules are but slightly infiltrated with semi-
liquid serum, and air still passes more or less into their air vesicles.
As the disease advances, the extent of solidified and darkened lung
increases, and portions of the lung tissue lose more or less the marbled
appearance, from the blood-staining of the interstitial deposit. The con-
solidation of structures advances so that the blood vessels are obstruct-
ed, the diseased lung loses all means of nourishment, and the older,
darker, and more solid portions become detached, so that they remain
as foreign bodies imbedded in cavities in the diseased tissue. The admis-
sions of air through the air passages into these cavities by dissolution
of the lung tissue, lead to the cavernous sounds which the ear can detect
in the living animal, and the broken-up tissue decomposes and induces
great fetor of the breath.
One lung may have several points diseased; each lobe may be affected
and little or no communication between the several parts implicated.
The great tenacity of a yellowish white deposit around a marked mar-
bled center of disease has been said to indicate a certain tendency to
limitation by the formation of a capsule, and several encapsulated cen-
ters may be found.
On taking a warm diseased lung, severing thé still healthy portions,
making incisions into the parts solidified, and suspending them so that
they may drain, a large amount of yellowish serum of a translucent
character, almost wholly free or more or less tinged with blood, is
obtained to the extent of pounds in weight. The amount varies with
weight of diseased lung drained. The quantity of this and of the solidi-
fied deposit in a diseased lung is so large, that from a normal weight of four
or five pounds, a lung attains to ten, twenty, forty, and I have seen one
as high as fifty-four pounds in weight.
AIR PASSAGES.
The condition of the air passages varies from a condition of perfect
freedom down to the diseased portions of lung, to a state in which the
mucous membrane is coated with false membrane or solid exudations of
lymph. By suitable means it is not difficult to isolate the solid white
lymph clogging the terminal bronchial tubes and air vesicles in the con-
solidated tissues, but at a distance from these parts it is only in some
cases that a kind of croupy complication exists. I have seen an animal
gasping for breath, with its mouth open, nostrils widely expanded, eyes
prominent, and visible mucous membranes of a bluish red color; on
30 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
opening the air passages of this cow after death, they were found
throughout their whole extent nearly filled with a deposit similar to
that usually found on the surface of the diseased lung.
There is little necessity for prolonging this description of cadaveric
manifestations. The heart’s sac is sometimes thickened by deposits
around it. Not unfrequently it contains an excess of serum. The heart
itself is contracted and pale, containing a little dark blood. The organs
of digestion at different stages manifest a state of dryness. The third
stomach, which is so constantly packed with dry food in febrile diseases,
is in the same condition in pleuro-pneumonia. I have known the mu-
cous layers spotted with irregular or circular congestions or blood extra-
vasations, and the membrane softening in these parts has become per-
forated. In advanced cases there is more or less diffuse redness, and
even blood extravasations in the large intestine, with fluid, fetid and
sometimes slightly blood-stained excrement, such as is discharged during
life.
The anemia—or bloodless condition of other tissues—the dark, dry look
of the meat dressed by the butcher, the yellow color of the fat in some
cases, and the small quantity of fat left in animals that have succumbed
under a chronic attack, are all general signs of greater or less value,
when taken in conjunction with the changes occurring in the chest
THE CAUSES OF THE LUNG PLAGUE.
The facts which have been adduced in the foregoing pages would seem
sufficient to set at rest discussions as to the causes hitherto alleged as
giving rise to the spontaneous development of contagious pleuro-pneu-
monia. Nevertheless we have seen that wherever the malady appears
for the first time the relation of its undoubted cause and effect is usually
overlooked. Many circumstances tend to obscure the observations even
of experts, and it is more particularly in large cities, where the disease is
most common and observers more numerous, that conditions mislead and
have misled. With a view therefore to impede the renewal of false
theories which have up to the present day insured the steady reproduc-
tion and propagation of this bovine pest, it may be well to enter into
details under three heads:
1st. The alleged original causes of the lung plague.
2d. Contagion and infection.
od. Conditions favoring or insuring communication of the disease by
actual contact or approach.
THE ALLEGED ORIGINAL CAUSES OF THE LUNG PLAGUE.
Man at all times and in virtue of a strong instinct theorizes on the
why and the wherefore of everything. Valentini, in his records of the
lung disease, overlooking altogether many points which, with the know-
ledge of the present day, enable us to interpret correctly the phenomena
THE LUNG PLAGUE. Bt
he observed, ascribed the lung plague to atmospheric agencies and unsea-
sonable weather. Haller, a shrewd observer and great philosopher,
adopted an inductive system of research, and, arguing from his own
sphere of observation, declared, in words which deserve to be written in
gold, that so far as his district was concerned the disease appeared always
to be imported. He did not hide the truth under a load of wild and fan-
ciful theories in attempting to explain more than he saw and could judge
of personally.
Siace the establishment of veterinary colleges in France, two theories
have been and to a certain extent continue to be advocated. Chabert
regarded the bovine pleuro-pneumonia so common in the dairies of Paris
as contagious, whereas Huzard held the contrary opinion. The field of
discussion widened, and it came to be very widely admitted that acute
affections of the chest were contagious, and the chronic forms incapable
of communication from the sick to the healthy. Not only was this
believed of pulmonary complaint among cattle; it was also accepted
with reference to glanders in the horse.
Delafond, though an able advocate of the contagiouscharacter of pleuro-
pneumonia in 1844, had previously entertained grave doubts on the ques-
tion. Even in his classical work on the disease, while advancing a large
mass of invaluable information demonstrating how in truth the malady
extends, his usual desire to round off and complete his works led him to
theorize and err as to the origin of what he calls “spontaneous pleuro-
pneumonia” in cattle. This expression is not applied by him to an ordi-
nary attack of infamniation of the lungs, which no one ever ascribes to
contagion, but to the lung plague. The local or determining causes of
the spontaneous form of this disease he summarizes as follows:
A. Heat and impure atmosphere of stablesin which cattle live for five
or six months of the year, especially when this heat, this impurity, are
combined with a very nutritive aliment that produces much blood.
B. Abundant milk secretions, required from cows in certain localities,
either for the sale of milk or of butter and cheese.
C. Chills of the skin and respiration by cold, humid, misty air, on pas-
tures, either during spring or autumn; the introduction of cold air in the
lungs in winter on taking animals from the stables to be watered.
D. The glacial waters which cattle are compelled to drink in winter,
and the unhealthy waters of marshes which they have to take in summer.
HK. The hard work to which work cattle are subjected in summer in
clearing forests, We.
I". Lastly, hereditary predisposition.
All this classified blundering might ve disposed of in one sentence, by
asserting the truth, that the experience of ages has shown in many parts
of the world, that all these causes, singly and combined, have failed to
induce a case of pleuro-pneumonia. Whether we examine the agricul-
tural annals of Scotland or Spain, of Canada or Texas, of South America
or Australia, it will be found that alternations of temperature, chills,
32 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICWLTURE.
breathing the pure air of heaven as near the north pole as cattle have
reached, drinking the frozen waters of North America or the stagnant
pools in the swamps of the Carolinas and Louisiana during the hottest
summers, the hard toils and sufferings of many a Mexican yoke of oxen,
and, lastly, the greatest negligence of an agricultural people in relation
to the improvements of breeds, one and all have failed ever to induce a
sinzle case of lung plague. Delafond had his theories. We have an
array of facts on our side as great and as incontrovertible as any ever
before adduced in support of any medical or other question.
But brevity is not always desirable when the object to be attained is
the diffusion of an abundant and accurate knowledge, and interesting
points may be beneficially discussed under the separate heads arranged
by Delafond.
SPECIAL CAUSES FAVORING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DISEASE IN
MOUNTAINS.
Delafond asserts that in Switzerland, Piedmont, the Juras, the Dau-
phiné, the Vosges, and Pyrenees, pleuro-pneumonia has existed per-
manently. He does not ascribe this to geological formation, but he
believes firmly, with almost all the veterinarians in mountainous dis-
tricts, that the disposition, topographic situation of mountains and val-
leys, the cold temperature during six months of the year, hoar frost,
heavy fogs, coldness and moisture of the nights and mornings on wood.
land pastures, or near lakes and rivers, frequent atmospheric currents
in spring and autumn, sudden changes from hot to cold, dry to wet, or
vice versa, &e., &e., are the local determining causes which combine,
with other causes that have yet to be noticed, in inducing the lung
plague. Delafond’s words are that the causes enumerated concur “ @
donner naissance & la péripneumonie dans la haute et dans la basse mon-
tagne.”
Delafond erred. He had not read Haller; and had he visited any
part where it was said the lung plague was a permanent infliction, he
would have found, with Haller, that it was always arriving from some-
where, but never originating spontaneously. If we examine the
geographical distribution of the disease we shall find the mountains of
northern Europe, of Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, free from the dis-
ease. And yet the special causes he refers to predominate there. No
part of Europe has been more constantly devastated than Holland,
noted for its submerged condition and the vast drainage works which
render it inhabitable. In the British isles the hills have always been
most free from pleuro-pneumonia. It has prevailed at all altitudes, but
the Scottish and Irish mountains, distant from high roads and the busy
traffic in cattle, have been the healthiest parts of our country. And in
America, too, the disease has traveled from the east southward along
the coast, attacking cities and farms most in communication with those
cities. It has not penetrated to the fine dairy farms on the hills in
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 33
New York State, and is not indigenous on the Alleghanies. It were a
much easier task to trace the malady to fertile valleys, where cattle are
often covered, as in Holland, to be protected from cold, and to towns
where animals are always in stables, than to trace the spontaneous
origin of the disease to the mountains of Central and Western Europe.
FEEDING.
There are many farmers, apt to reason on insufficient data, who notice
coincidences between the development of the lung disease and great
increase in some countries in the number of distilleries, the amount of
grains and distillery waste fed to cattle. Others declare the disease
commenced with the potato disease, and may be produced by feeding
cattle on diseased potatoes. The introduction of turnip husbandry,
which undoubtedly first made us acquainted with a form of red water
in cows, and severe apoplectic affections in sheep, has also been regarded
as the cause in Great Britain, of the lung disease in cattle. Delafond
agrees that the foods named do not cause pleuro-pneumonia, and it would
be easy to fill a large volume with facts in support of this assertion ;
and yet he goes on to say that food that is too succulent, distributed in
large quantity among cattle that are being stall fed, either for the
butcher or for the production of milk, may induce (peut occasioner,)
pleuro-pneumonia.
We are not ignorant of the precise results which ensue when an
excessive quantity, inordinate richness, or diseased condition of the
alimentary matters named may operate in inducing ill effects. Diseased
potatoes induce indigestion and colic. Turnips grown on ill-drained
lands give rise to hematuria, the red water of cows after parturition.
Distillery products occasion diuresis, disturbed digestion, and when
still charged with alcoholic principles give rise to cerebral disturbance,
apoplexy and death. These, and not pleuro-pneumonia, are known to us
as capable of development from the abuse of otherwise useful articles
of cattle feeding. °
STABLING—STALL FEEDING.
2
Many have been the high-colored descriptions of the wretched
stables, sheds, or what the Scotch people term ‘“byres,” in which cattle
are housed. It matters not that for generations cattle were similarly
housed without suffering from pleuro-pneumonia. There are always
those ready to skim the surface for reasons, and, after noticing the close-
ness, filth, and torturing narrowness of cattle stalls, ascribe to that any
and every plague infecting the cow shed. It is needless to walk the
observer through the fetid holes in which cattle are kept for the supply
of milk in Copenhagen, where pleuro-pneumonia has not been observed,
nor to refer to the days when the London dairymen, richer in money
and cows, kept the latter worse, bred from them regularly, and could
3
34 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
maintain country farms on which to graze them while calving. It stands
to reason, according to some, that such conditions must induce pleuro-
pneumonia. In America, sensation articles and skillful illustrations
have not been wanting, and no one can hesitate in declaring that the
cow sheds of Brooklyn and other cities are a disgrace to a civilized
people.
Huzard first described the cow houses of Paris as they were in 1793.
It is needless to follow him through a long description of low sheds, in
which a man could not stand erect, where cows were crippled into per-
manent rest, with their horns overgrown and distorted for want of regular
wear and tear, and in which fowls, pigs, and rabbits shared shelter and
a pestilential atmosphere. Delafond has described the wretched stabling
of hill farmers. How, then, can it be said that in these sheds, where the
lung plague always prevails, the conditions do not exist for its sponta-
neous origin?
It cannot be disputed that there are conditions—as when an animal suf-
fers from pleuro-pneumonia, and has but one lung to breathe with—under
which a large volume of pure air may turn the scale from death to life.
It is also undoubted that the concentration of the poison so freely given
off in this contagious disease must materially favor its reproduction in
the systems of susceptible animals. But no one who has witnessed the
slow progress of the malady in town dairies, and the rapid destruction
of herds in open fields, can for a moment believe in the usual aggrayva-
tion of the malady by bad stabling. Where the malady has been induced
among young stock by large dairymen so as to prevent after incon-
veniences, when the animals are fit to breed and yield milk, it has been
found that most survived when kept warm in close sheds. Recommenda-
tions as to ventilating stables after disease had commenced, have at times
resulted in amuch more rapid destruction of the cattle, and we are bound
to admit that @ priori reasoning has often been at fault on this subject.
ABUNDANT MILK SECRETION.
The universal prevalence of the lung plague in town dairies, where
cows are kept for an abundant production of milk, has led to the theory
that the drain on the system thus kept up induces the pleuro-pneumonia.
It is asserted, and there appears some ground for the belief, that the
human female, as well as the female among lower animals, is more sus-
ceptible than others to the influences of contagion, but so far no facts of
importance have ever been published indicating that an abundant secre-
tion of milk induces specific disease and malignant fevers. Delafond
has referred to abundant production in dairies where pleuro-pneumonia
was always troublesome, and expresses himself as follows: “I firmly
believe that cows which calve every ten or eleven months, and which
are constantly yielding an abundant milk secretion, whether by being
fed abundantly on rich provender, or placing them in hot, damp stables,
so as to check cutaneous and pulmonary secretion, soon have their chest
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 35
enfeebled and are seized with pleuro-pneumonia; or, at all events, and
that is incontestable, they become predisposed to the disease, which they
easily get on being exposed to the breathing of a cold air, or to cold on the
surface of the sin.”
Here, again, it is not difficult to trace the real effects of an abundant
milk secretion in stables that are close and ill-drained. Up to the time
when the lung disease first appeared in London it was not uncommon
for cows to be milked for several consecutive years. Large milkers were
always kepton, and had acalf annually until too old or killed by disease.
The disease that killed them was not pleuro-pneumonia, but tuberculosis.
That malady, once so prevalent, is almost unknown now, inasmuch as
the London cow feeders have ceased to breed from their cows, and the
average duration of a cow’s lifetime in a London shed does not exceed
six months.
DRINKING COLD OR IMPURE WATER.
It is hardly necessary to refer at length to this reputed cause of pleuro-
pneumonia. Not only is there an absence of fact in support of the
production of the malady by cold water in winter and stagnant in
summer, but it is well known that the malady is usually most rife in
many cities during the summer, when cattle are allowed, as in Washing-
ton, to roam at pleasure during the day, coming in contact, and, there-
fore, infecting each other, yet while the supply of water is good, and
indeed unexceptionable. Wereit worth while [ could easily furnish many
facts under this head indicating that there is no relation whatever
between the condition and quantity of water cattle drink and the devel-
opment of the lung disease.
CHILLS—BREATHING A COLD AIR.
East winds in Seotland were blamed by Professor Dick as the active
agency inducing bovine pleuro-pneumonia. He overlooked the fact that
the east winds prevailed before 1843, when the lung plague had not yet
penetrated Scotland. I have seen on the coast of Fife a herd of cattle
of all ages seized with bronchitis—a curable, benignant, and acute inflam-
mation, presenting none of the characters of the lung plague; and there
is no doubt that deficient shelter, intense cold, and rapid changes of the
weather, may induce sporadic and non-contagious inflammations of the
respiratory organs. But this is not pleuro-pneumonia.
It is not at all uncommon in Great Britain, Holland, and elsewhere,
for farmers to ascribe the disease to chills; and its prevalence among
drift cattle has been referred to transportation for long distances in open
railway cars, on steamboats, and exposure in markets. But who ever
heard of western cattle being struck with the lung plague in passing
from Illinois to New York? Spanish cattle, reared in a country free from
pleuro-pneumonia, suffer all the hardships of rough weather at sea, but
36 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
are landed invariably sound in their lungs in Liverpool or London. Dan-
ish cattle cross the German Ocean and suffer much ill-treatment, but
their dissection reveals at no time the lesions of the lung plague.
Not so with Dutch or Irish cattle. They make a short sea voyage
from an infected country and propagate pleuro-pneumonia wherever they
come in contact with susceptible cattle.
Innumerable observations undoubtedly show that the lung plague
prevails as much, and often more, during hot weather than in the win-
ter months; it spares many cold countries into which it has no opportu-
nity of transportation, and visits the most genial climate whither sick
cattle have been taken. Italy and Australia furnish as good fields for
its development as the Swiss Alps, and the colder portions of the
United States.
OVERWORK.
In France and Italy it has been asserted that keeping oxen long in
the yoke, exhausting them, starving, and often drenching them with
rain, induced the lung disease. I know not what diseases such prae-
tices have not been said to cause. If we survey the countries where
pleuro-pneumonia has been longest known, and where its ravages have
been most intense, we shall find that, as a rule, it prevails among milk
cattle that never work, steers that are grazed or stall-fed, and never
broken to the plow or wagon, and herds of breeding stock, as in the .
Australian runs, never accustomed to restraint or punishment.
HEREDITARY PREDISPOSITION—CONGENITAL PLEURO-PNEUMONIA.
It is necessary to establish clearly the difference between hereditary
taint and congenital disease. A malady is termed hereditary when it is
transmitted from parent to offspring by virtue of a constitutional defect,
deformity, or taint. It may, but usually does not, appear at birth. The
best example is furnished by cancer, which occurs frequently in the
human female, and recurs for generations. None of the specific or
contagious fevers are hereditary, and although the question has been
discussed in relation to pleuro-pneumonia, it can easily be settled.
Delafond thought that the deterioration of breeds might favor its devel-
opment. And why, then, has the disease not appeared in South America,
while it has decimated the matchless herds of England and Aus-
tralia? It may be accepted as a settled truth that the lung disease, like
the rinderpest and foot and mouth disease, spreads without reference to
any peculiar breed. Improved and unimproved breeds are alike sus-
ceptible of the affection.
Calves are, however, born at times of sick cows, and present unmis-
takable signs of the lung plague. The first observation of this sort was
made by Hilfelhelseim, in the Rhine provinces, who dissected the
foetuses of cows that aborted under the disease. He found the lesions
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 37
of pleuro-pneumonia in these animals. Delafond made similar observa-
tions, but has created some confusion by including cases of tuberculosis
with others of pleuro-pneumonia. In 1839, a cow that had gone six
months in ealf was killed in Fribourg, Switzerland, while suffering from
pleuro-pneumonia. The foetus presented signs of the malady. It is
common for calyes to take the disease soon after birth, and I have
shown in a government report that the contagious cattle diseases of
Ireland, including pleuro-pneumonia, were mainly due to the active
trade in sucking-calves between the large towns of England and
Dublin’
It has been necessary frequently to refer to animals that are suscepti-
ble and insuseceptible to attacks of pleuro-pneumonia. This has been
ascribed by some to constitutional or inbred resistance or weakness.
Tt is due to what pathologists term, for want of a better name or expla-
nation, idiosynerasy. At times it appears that young animals resist
the disease better than old ones; and Mr. Harvey, of Glasgow, found
that by communicating the disease to yearlings and two-year-olds, he
had fewer deaths than when he had it among his pregnant and milch
cows. But, as Sauberg has observed, outbreaks occur in which the
older animals seem to bear up better than the young ones, and it is
difficult, on present data, to establish any rule on the point.
It may be accepted as proved that all cattle, whatever their age,
breed, sex, condition, &c., are susceptible to pleuro-pneumonia until
they have been once seized, and then it is rare to witness a second
attack. An insusceptible animal is, therefore, an animal that has once
had the disease, either in a mild or latent, or severe and apparent, form,
It is, however, certain that a degree of insusceptibility may be traced
in animals that have never been affected, and we are quite at a loss to
account for this. Similar observations are made in relation to all fevers
affecting men and animals. A person has been known to nurse many
during an outbreak of yellow fever, escape and live for a year, when
the disease has reappeared, and the individual who has been proof
against the malady one year has been among the first to die from it the
next.
Not a few cases have been recorded of rinderpest—and I have wit-
nessed a remarkable one—of a cow standing for weeks by animals that
died of the malady and which never showed signs of it. More strange than
this are two observations, one in Lyons in 1853, and the other in Vienna
in 1865, of dogs which could not be rendered rabid by the bites of, and
inoculations from, undoubtedly rabid dogs. For the time, at all events,
we must rest satisfied with the pathologist's explanation that these
animals had a peculiar constitutional immunity or idiosynerasy.
CONTAGION AND INFECTION.
Not only have theories in relation to the cause or combinations of
causes which may lead to the development of pleuro-pneumonia been
38 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
unsatisfactory, but opportunities are constantly presenting themselves
to test the fact that privations, overcrowding, impure food and water,
&e., singly or combined, may kill, but never induce the disease which
presents the characters of the one referred to in this report.
The malady may be induced at will, by placing an animal suffering
from it among healthy ones, and by direct inoculation. These are
only methods by which it is propagated.
Careful experiments have been instituted on this subject, and although
it might be easy to refer to very numerous observations, it may suffice
at present to quote from a French report, edited by Professor Bouley,
and which was prepared by a committee of distinguished agricultur-
ists, medical and veterinary professors, at. the request of the minister
of agriculture.
FIRST SERIES OF EXPERIMENTS.
The first series of experiments was conducted at Pomerage, in the
well-known and vast domain of Rambouillet. The whole is inclosed in
walls, surrounded by woods, and perfectly isolated. A stable was sep-
arated into two distinct compartments. In the first, designated A, with
a southwest exposure, was a single door leading out on a sufficiently
wide plot of ground, bounded by water where the cattle could be taken
to drink. Every precaution was taken to prevent the cattle in A from
coming within reach of those in a second stable, B. The latter was
situated to the left of A, and completely separated by a solid wall.
Pleuro-pneumonia had never existed in the commune of Rambouillet.
Messrs. Renault, Delafond, and Jouet chose the cattle and subjected them
to a close examination. .The herd consisted of three bulls and seventeen
cows. These animals were distinguished by names and numbers, and
distributed in the two stables in relation to age, breed, and sex, so as to
secure an equable distribution.
Three sick cows were sent to Rambouillet on the 14th of November,
1851; one from the Département du Nord, the second from Mont Souris,
and the third from Vaugirard. Three more sick cows were sent on the
2d of December, 1851. Of these six sick animals, three died and three
recovered. One lived three days in stable A, a second five days and a
night in the same, and the third, in stable B, survived ten days and two
nights.
Of the three sick cows that recovered, one, admitted into stable A en
the 10th of November, presented symptoms of the malady up to the 20th
of December, viz: for thirty-four days. The second entered stable B on
the 2d of December, and was sick for nineteen days. The third, also
admitted in the same stable, continued ill for twenty-eight days.
Stable A.—On the 21st of November, 1851, viz: only six days after
the introduction into this stable of two sick cows, a peculiar cough was
shown by two cows, (La Noire, No. 16, and Norma, No. 2.) Their lungs
appeared sound, and they continued to eat and ruminate.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 39%
The same symptom manifested itself successively, as follows:
First, on Coquette. (No. 3,) on the 22d of November.
Second, on Rosine, (No. 9,) on the 23d of November.
Third, on Berthe, (No. 8,) on the 25th of November.
Fourth, on Babet, (No. 7,) on the 3d of December.
. Fifth, on Clara, (No. 1,) on the 5th of December.
Sixth, on Olga, (No. 6,) on the 7th of December.
Seventh, on Martin, (No. 15,) on the 10th of December.
Thus, twenty-four days after the admission of two sick cows, and eight
days after the introduction of a third sick animal, out of ten healthy ani-
mals, nine presented the abnormal indication of a peculiar cough. Only,
one cow (La Caille, No. 11) continued in perfect health.
After this first sign of sickness, the characteristic symptoms of pleuro-
pheumonia appeared in six cows, in the following order:
First, Olga, (No. 6,) thirty-one days after first contact.
Second, La Noire, (No. 16,) thirty-two days after first contact.
Third, Clara, (No. 1,) thirty-five days after first contact.
Fourth, Rosine, (No. 9,) thirty-five days after first contact.
Fifth, Norma, (No. 2,) thirty-seven days after first contact.
Sixth, Coquette, (No. 3,) fifty-seven days after first contact.
Of these six animals one only died, viz: Olga, (No. 6,) and her carcass
was removed to Alfort on the 6th of January, and there dissected by the
members of the commission. ;
Of the five other cows in this stable, the reporters say that symptoms
of variable intensity and duration appeared, and they all recovered, with
the exception of some lesions recognized some time after by dissection.
Of the three animals (Berthe, No. 8, Babet, No. 7, and Martin, No. 15)
which began to cough the first days after contact with the sick cows,
the only symptom which lasted, and is said to have continued for several
months, was the cough.
Stable B—On the 25th of November, 1851, viz: nine days after the
introduction in stable B of the two sick cows, (Nos. 23 and 24,) the healthy
cows began to cough, in the following order:
First, Suzon, (No. 13,) on the 26th of November.
Second, La Garde, (No. 20,) on the 2d of December.
Third, Marton, (No. 5,) on the 3d of December.
Fourth, Kettley, (No. 17,) on the 7th of December.
Fifth, Leduc, (No. 18,) on the 10th of December.
Sixth, Nebula, (No. 4,) on the 18th of December.
Seventh, Homard, (No. 14,) on the 28th of December.
So that thirty-two days after the introduction of sick cows in stable B,
out of ten healthy animals seven presented the peculiar abnormal sign
\. of a peculiar cough.
Three animals (Junon, No. 19, Bringé, No. 10, and Biche, No. 12) con-
tinued in perfect health.
40 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
Well-marked symptoms of pleuro-pneumonia presented themselves on
four cows, in the following order:
First, La Garde, (No. 20,) sixteen days after first contact.
Second, Ledue, (No. 18,) thirty days after first contact.
Third, Marton, (No. 5,) thirty-five days after first contact.
Fourth, Homard, (No. 14,) forty days after first contact. ;
Two of these animals died after nine days’ illness. The other two
were quite convalescent in twenty-eight and thirty-five days respectively.
The three other animals continued to cough for some months without
manifesting more serious symptoms.
. The conclusions drawn by the French commissioners from the forego-
ing experiments were as follows:
The epizoétic pleuro-pneumonia of cattle is susceptible of transmission
from sick to healthy animals by cohabitation. :
Twenty per cent. of the animals manifest a resistance to the contagion.
Highty per cent. manifest various effects of the contagious influence.
Fifty per cent. are seized with decided symptoms of pleuro-pneumonia,
and of these fifteen per cent. succumb, and thirty-five per cent. recover.
Immediate contact is not necessary for the transmission of the disease,
and the first affected were among the furthest removed from the sick.
A better idea of the results of the very important experiments thus
related may be formed by the subjoined tables, which show at a glance
the conditions under which the disease was propagated. I have enlarged
the French tables, and included all the data of importance.
SECOND SERIES OF EXPERIMENTS.
The second series of experiments was instituted with a view to learn
whether the animals that had been once affected enjoyed an immunity
against further attacks, and whether those that had resisted the disease
were susceptible of subsequent infection.
On the 5th of March, 1852, there were placed in a stable on the farm
of Charentonneau—
1st. Five cows from Pomerage, viz: Bringé, (No. 10,) from stable B,
which had resisted the disease; Kettley, (No. 17,) ditto; Clara, (No. 1,)
from stable A, which first showed signs of pleuro-pneumonia on the 21st
of December, 1851; Norma; (No. 2,) from the same stable, affected the
23d of December; La Coquette, ditto, date of attack 21st of January,
1852.
2d. With these five cows were placed two perfectly healthy animals,
(Marion, No. 7, and Zula, No. 8.)
3d. Lastly, six cows, (Rose de Mai, No. 1, Mille Fleurs, No. 4, Jacque-
line, No. 3, Blanchette, No. 8, Rosette, No. 3, and Bucheronne, No. 5,)
inoculated with blood, nasal discharge, and feecal fluids, were also sub-
mitted to the influence of cohabitation.
On the 2ist of January, 1852, two sick cows were placed in this stable.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. Al
One of these cows was left eighteen days in the stable, and then killed
to serve for the purpose of inoculation experiments. On the 27th of
June another sick cow was placed in the same stable.
The result was that the five animals from Pomerage resisted the dis-
ease as well as one of the healthy ones. The second healthy cow was
seized with the malady thirty-five days after cohabitation.
In order to confirm the above results, the commissioners caused to be
placed in stable A all that remained of the first herd. On the 6th of
July, 1852, five cows were sent from Paris to Pomerage. _ Not one of the
animals that had served in previous experiments contracted the disease.
The history of pleuro-pneumonia, coupled with the observations made
on the supposed casual agencies capable of inducing the disease, are
almost sufficient to establish the purely contagious nature of the disease,
but there are several important proofs that deserve mention.
It is seen in all countries where the lung plague appears, that it
spreads in proportion to the opportunities of contagion. It is worst in
large cities, where cow feeders have to make frequent purchases. It is
apt to diminish in severity, as per example, in the city of Washington,
in Dublin, Ireland, and elsewhere, so long as the cows are confined to
stables in the winter and different herds have no chance of approach.
When spring and fine weather arrive, and the cows are turned out during
part of the day, or altogether, on commons, parks, or pastures, the pres-
ence of any infection results in the rapid dissemination of the disease.
I had special occasion to study this among the cows turned out into the
Phenix Park, Dublin, and on the commons near Neweastle, in England.
In 1862 I chose a large estate in Perthshire, presenting the feature of
being cut up in farms, on some of which cattle were wholly bred;
whereas, on others, purchases had occasionally been made. The result
was the demonstration of the fact that the disease appeared only where
it was carried by diseased cattle. The estate was that of Lord Wil-
loughby d’Eresby, comprising twenty-six farms, on eleven of which the
‘disease was at different times imported; whereas on the fifteen other
farms, interspersed between eleven, the only report to be obtained was,
“Never had the disease. Breeds his own stock.”
A similar inquiry relating to the parish of St. Martin, in Perthshire,
showed that pleuro-pneumonia had appeared. there in 1845. Since then
ten farms have been visited by the disease, and in every case the attack
has been distinctly traced to contact with diseased cattle. Nineteen
farms, on which eattle are bred and purchases rarely made, have enjoyed
a perfect immunity
The high-prized herds of England, which have been carefully isolated
by their proprietors, have always remained free from the disease, and
short-horn breeders have, in many instances, exercised the greatest care
not to have any admixture with strange animals, which would certainly
have destroyed their stock.
It is needless entering at length into the subject of authorities on this
42 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
point. The voice of the ablest and most careful observers, who have
studied pleuro-pneumonia practically, is unanimous on the point; and
although in every country the tendency has been at first to regard this
insidious disease as originating from atmospheric agencies, when the
facts have been probed by skillful men, the earlier opinions have been
rejected. Gerlach, in 1835, Delafond, in 1844, and Sauberg, in 1846,
published very abundant and conclusive testimony on this point.
THE PATHOLOGY, OR NATURE OF THE LUNG PLAGUE.
There is nothing more dangerous and better calculated to retard inquiry
and truth than the common practice of speculating as to the nature of
specific diseases in men and animals by the analogical method. Bovine
pleuro-pneumonia has been widely supposed to be an inflammation of
the lungs, governed by the same conditions that operate in relation to
ordinary inflammations of the chest in the human family, and, indeed,
in all mammalia. Thecharacteristic signs of small-pox depend on a cuta-
neous inflammation, but have apperances different from the results of a
seald. Itis as rational to define variola inflammation of the skin as it is to
declare that the lung disease of cattle is an inflammation of the air passage
and lungs. The local phenomena of the disease are associated with and
characterized by inflammatory changes, but the cause in operation
inducing all this is peculiar and specific.
The lung plague is a malignant fever, never generated de novo, so far
as reliable observation has yet reached, dependent on the introduction
of a virus or contagion into the system of a healthy animal. This prin-
ciple produces a local change if inserted into any part provided with a
connective or fatty tissue, in which it most readily penetrates. The same
local change is produced by its contact with the delicate mucous surface
of the bronchial tubes. It adheres, spreads not unlike cancer, regard-
less of the nature and importance of the structure it invades, and
traverses the lymphatic vessels to form deposits in the neighboring
lymphatic glands, but not generally throughout the lymphatic sys-
tem. At first there is no great intensity of inflammation. Suppuration
is only a later complication from the concomitant non-specific change in
masses of areolar or connective tissue. Congestion and a serous
infiltration rapidly surround the spot inoculated. Heat, redness, pain,
and swelling manifest themselves, and the reproduction and extension
of the tissue-destroying virus may be judged by the extent of swelling ;
the amount of the yellow gelatinous serosity or exudation which fills the
lung tissue, thickens white fibrous structures, blocks up the adipose
tissue corpuscles out of which the fat is displaced, and is only limited
in many cases by the amount of connective tissue it can invade, by gravi-
tation or otherwise, and the endurance of the animal under a process so
prostrating and depletive.
That all this happens, we have tested by experiment. A susceptible
animal is inoculated in the dewlap, and at the expiration of a week or
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 43
nine days a swelling begins, infiltration extends beneath the chest and
abdomen, involves both fore legs, is attended with great fever, prostra-
tion, and death. In a second case, a drop of virus is inserted in the tip
of the tail. It may produce a scarcely perceptible local change, when
suddenly a swelling occurs at the root of the tail. The lymphatic
glands there situated swell, the areolar tissue is distended with a deposit,
such as ordinarily occurs in this disease in the thorax, and so widely
does this invade the open tissues of the pelvis as to close the rectum,
sometimes induce retention of urine, and, in the majority of instances,
kill.
As in the case of variolous inoculation, the effects often vary with the
quantity of the virus introduced into a part. Many and deep pune-
tures, especially in soft and vascular textures, will produce majignant
variola in inoculating sheep. On the other hand, a single and superficial
puncture results in a single pustule and imperceptible general symptoms.
It is thus with the lung disease in cattle.
The slight local change produced by a small quantity of virus, even
though it has been impossible to note any systemic disturbance, stands
for an attack of the disease, and the animal enjoys almost a perfect
immunity from further attacks.
Viewed in this light, we have to classify bovine pleuro-pneumonia
with the contagious fevers, and we must recognize that it is peculiar and
different from all other known diseases of man or animals. The ordinary
phenomena of inflammations are but superadded conditions, and an
animal may have the disease without indicating their presence.
MEDICAL TREATMENT OF THE LUNG PLAGUE.
A general and practical review of the means employed for the cure
of the lung disease results in the conviction that, as a means to be relied
on for the protection of the farmer’s stock and the herds of a country,
they are worse than useless; and it is necessary to impress this lesson
on the public mind, as there are always those who base their futile
efforts in this respect on the declaration that all diseases are curable if
we could only know the means to attack them, and the best antidotes.
When science has sufficiently advanced, it is thought d'sease will lose
all its power; and, in accordance with extravagant views in this diree-
tion, men and animals ought to attain a state of immortality on earth.
It is an undoubted fact that wherever rational preventive measures
have been superseded by the efforts even of the most skilled veterinary
practitioners, the mortality by the lung plague has always attained its
highest point, and continued without intermission. It must be thus to
the end of time.
Nevertheless, circumstances arise when a certain relief may be afforded
by remedial agents. A valuable animal or highly prized herd, so
isolated from other stock as to prevent contagion, may be subjected to
44 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
rational medical treatment. A survey of the means suggested in the
past, of the principles which should guide us in the present state of
knowledge, and of the details concerning my own practice, may, there-
fore, be considered important in this place.
Bourgelat, in 1769, recommended abundant blood-letting the first, see-
ond, and third day, (when the blood fails to coagulate, it is a sign that
this operation is useless,) emollient injections, bland or soothing bev-
erages, (breuwvages adoucissants,) emollient masticatories, and emollient
fumigations of the nose. When the disease is far advanced, blood-
letting must be avoided, and reliance placed in cinchona bark and pur-
gative injections. Bourgelat also prescribed small blood-lettings, low
diet, emollient clysters, and fumigations of acetic acid in the stables.
There is little interesting on this subject up to the date of Delafond’s
work, 1844. He opens his chapter on the curative means of acute
pleuro-pneumonia as follows: “Many persons and some veterinarians
have sought in the arsenal of pharmacology the specific remedies for
the cure of pleuro-pneumonia. I declare that for the cure of this disease
there exists no specific, but rather rational curative means based on the
nature, seat, and stage of the malady. The two great secrets, in my
opinion, are, first, in recognizing pleuro-pneumonia at its commencement;
and, second, in adopting the means that I have to deseribe.”
T cannot, with fairness, make a very brief summary of Delafond’s
recommendations, and, in the main, shall give a translation of them,
When pleuro-pneumonia, he says, affects a herd of cattle, the first
animal affected must be removed and placed in an isolated spot, to be
carefully examined during the entire progress of the case. Frequent
examinations must be made of each animal in the herd. All that show
a short, quick breathing, numbering from twenty-five to thirty respira-
tions per minute, and an accelerated pulse, beating from sixty to sixty-
five times per minute, in which the chest is evidently flattened either on
one side or the other, whose respiratory murmurs will be loud and
associated with a friction sound, and which have their visible mucous
membranes reddened, must be regarded as subjects which, notwith-
standing that they continue to eat and drink, ruminate, and give milk
as in health, will in three or four days cease to eat, ruminate, and give
milk. They will moan and indicate all the signs of pleuro-pneumonia
at a period when it is severe and often incurable.
An animal chosen with care in the earliest stage, and isolated, must
be placed on low diet, and only allowed a little green grass or hay.
From six to eight pounds of blood must be drawn, and this repeated
eight or ten hours later. As soon as the blood has ceased to flow, the
body and limbs must be rubbed for half an hour with hay or straw
wisps, and a good covering must be thrown over the body. Three hours
after the first bleeding, and every two hours afterwards for sixteen hours,
a draught must be given, consisting of one drachm of emetic tartar
in a quart of river or spring water. For animals under two years of age
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 45
the dose of the tartrate of antimony should be half a drachm, and for
animals from three to eight years of age a drachm and a half each time.
After the second bleeding the draughts are continued, and if, after
twelve hours, the respirations have not been lowered, to twenty and
three-and-twenty per minute, a third abstraction of the same quantity
of blood must be practiced. If the pulse becomes strong and full, the
breathing less frequent, the mucous membranes paler, and especially if
the respiratory murmurs are less loud, it may be considered that the
animal is saved, and that its convalescence will be short.
Independently of the bleedings and the administration of emetic
tartar, about fifteen liters of water, with three liters of barley, may be
boiled, throwing off the first water and adding thirty liters more. Two
pounds of sulphate of soda is added to this barley tea, and one liter of
this mixture is given, alternatively with the emetic every three hours.
Marshmallows, linseeds, or coarse bran, are to be made into a decoc-
tion, and administered in the form of four injections daily. This same
material may be used warm to steam the animal’s nostrils, by placing
it in a stable-pail and covering the animal’s head and the pail with a
large cloth.
These measures, says Delafond, must be continued for three or four
days—indeed, during the entire first period of the disease ; and it is rare
that the respiratory movements do not return to their normal condition.
If the patient purges, injections of bran decoction are recommended.
Animals that indicate a yellow or paled and infiltrated aspect of the
conjunctive must be bled to the extent of one liter or a liter and a half
daily, as heavy blood-lettings are prejudicial in such cases.
When pleuro-pneumonia begins by an inflammation of the pleura, the
animal must be bled to the extent of two or four pounds two or three
times daily. The emetic draughts are to be persevered in, the body well
rubbed and clothed, and the sides of the chest must be rubbed with hot
vinegar, or with a mixture of three ounces of ammonia to one ounce of
vinegar. An infusion, in two liters of hot vinegar, of a pound of white or
black hellebore, or of the large horse-radish sage may be found economical
in some parts. If these cannot be had, a blistering tincture may be pre-
pared, as follows: Powdered cantharides, two ounces ; powdered euphor-
bium, one drachm; alcohol, one-half pound. The three substances
must be left in a bottle for some days, and then filtered.
If the symptoms subside, the animal is to be kept under shelter and
on moderate diet. If, on the contrary, the pleurisy terminates in effu-
sion, and the lung tissue is engorged and hepatized, no hopes can be
entertained of the animal’s recovery.
When the lung disease commences by an active inflammation of the
bronchial tubes, the jugular vein must be freely opened and from six to
ten pounds of blood abstracted; other emissions, from four to eight
pounds each, must be repeated for two or three days each. If the
inflammation continues and spreads to the lung tissue, the dry rubbing,
46 ; DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
emollient fumigations, and injections of marshmallow or bran decoc-
tions, containing three ounces of sulphate of soda, must be persisted in.
This treatment must continue four or five days; but if the cough per-
sists, a seton must be inserted in the dewlap, and the seton medicated
with the vinegar infusion of the white or black hellebore. When the
inflammation subsides, the sternutatory vinegar prescribed by Mathieu
renders good service. It is compounded as follows: Alum, sulphate of
zine, Spanish pepper, turpentine, one ounce each; camphor, two drachms;
strong Burgundy vinegar, one pint. The solid substances are to be
powdered and mixed with the vinegar and turpentine. They are to be
macerated for eight hours, placed in a well-corked bottle, and well shaken
before being given to the animal. Three times a day, and when the
animal is fasting, a small teaspoonful of vinegar is poured into one or
other of the nostrils. The animals that have once had this operation
performed can with difficulty be induced to submit to it again.
Immediately after the administration, big tears drop from the eyes, and
violent sneezing tends to discharge mucosities and the false membranes
which obstruct the bronchial tubes and nasal cavities. Should the
bronchitis terminate in inflammation of the pulmonary tissue, and this
pass rapidly into a state of hepatization, further measures must be
resorted to.
When pleuro-pneumonia is simple or complicated by pleurisy or bron-
chitis, and terminates in gangrene, the case may be regarded as irreme-
diable. The same is true if there is an abundant effusion in the pleura.
The animal soon dies asphyxiated.
The symptoms of a severe and desperate case are suspension of feed-
ing and rumination, tympanitis, or distension of the paunch by gas im-
mediately after feeding, pulse from sixty to seventy and small, tender-
ness on pressure of the sides of the chest, absence of respiratory murmur
and friction sound, short and moaning expiration, violent heart-beats,
driveling at the mouth, and the obstinate maintenance of the standing
posture. It is difficult, with such symptoms, for the animal to recover,
but cases of slow restoration to health have occurred.
At this stage the animal is to be bled only to the extent of two to
four pounds for two or three days. The emetic drinks must not be given,
but the sulphate of soda persevered with. The injections, fumigations,
and dry rubbings must be followed up; a seton and one or two rowels on
the sides of the chest are to be inserted. A little easily-digested food is
to be given the animal, and about an ounce of salt daily. If the mucous
membrane remains pale and the animal feeble, drinks containing vegeta-
ble tonics, such as gentian, &c., must be used. Dieterichs vaunts tar-
water, to which two drachms of essence of turpentine is added, and
which is used for fifteen or twenty days. When an animal is convales-
cent it may be turned out for au hour or two during fine weather. A
relapse is to be treated by a slight bleeding, low diet, frictions, and sul-
phate of soda.
THE LUNG PLAGUE, AT
Such are the long and precise recommendations which Delafond gave,
and which may be viewed, in the main, as measures from first to last to
be scrupulously avoided. Delafond’s belief in the treatment he recom-
mends as benefiting sick animals, is but one of innumerable instances of
men being misled by nature’s own recuperative powers.
Sauberg, in his prize essay published in 1846, devoted a chapter to
the therapeutics of pleuro-pneumonia, but he is not sparing in words of
caution, and in impressing on the minds of agriculturists that there is no
specific against the disease.* He indorses Delafond’s practice of blood-
letting, and says that if this is resorted to at the right time the animal
improves at once. - If the patient is young, robust, in good condition ; if
the mucous membranes are red, the pulse small, hard, and frequent,
breathing short and quick, heart-beats scarcely to be felt, then from ten
to fifteen or twenty pounds of blood must be abstracted. It is only by
this means, says Sauberg, that the abundant exudation of plastic lymph
in the lungs, as well as other evil results can be averted. If no improve-
ment is observed within eighteen or twenty-four hours, a second and even
larger blood-letting must be performed. After the fifth day of an attack
of pleuro-pneumonia Sauberg never bled, and whenever he did so, he ob-
served great prostration and even death. It is evident, he says, that
whereas an early bleeding may prevent the exudation, should this have
taken place, the loss of blood may undermine the vital powers so as to
prevent the possibility of recovery.
- Sauberg is one of the strongest advocates of derivatives. He recom-
mends a seton on the’ dewlap, or one on either side of the chest. He
also advises a blister spread over a surface deprived of hair to the extent
of a man’s hand, behind each shoulder blade. The vesicant he uses is a
compound of potassio tartrate of antimony, powdered cantharides, and
euphorbium, of each three quentchen, lard four loth, and one loth of oil
of turpentine. He also suggests the application of the red-hot iron to
the sides of the chest. In slight cases rowels dressed with black helle-
bore suffice. The quicker and more active the results of these applica-
tions, the more favorable is their operation.
The internal remedies recommended by Sauberg, consist mainly in
tartar emetic, which, he says, is attended with the best results. He
givesitin the morning in one or two drachm doses, with two or three ounces
of sulphate of soda, an ounce of nitrate of potash, anda half an ounce
*At page 131 of Sauberg’s work, already quoted, the author says: “ Wir haben kein
Arcanum gegen die Lungenseuche des Rindyiehes und werden auch keins finden;
wenn man nur beriicksichtigt wie die Krankheit bei den einzelnen Thieren so verschie-
den ist, und die Mittel, die bei einem Kranken mit Nutzen angewandt wurden, bei dem
anderen, wenn nicht Nachtheile, doch nicht gleich giinstige Erfolee zu Wege brachten,
-so wird man sich wohl bescheiden. Wo der Landmann die Behandlung der Kranken
nicht einem Thierarzt anvertranen kann oder will, sollte er nur nach allgemeinen Grund-
siitzen verfahren, eine zweckmiissige Diiit anordnen, und nicht sein Heil in kostbaren
Mitteln suchen, der Verbreitung der Seuche méglichst vorbauen, und wo Heilung der
Erkrankten nicht méglich ist, das Schlachten vorziehen.”
48 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
of powdered juniper berries. This has an effect on the animal’s bowels.
In gastric or bilious complications he gives the emetic tartar m two or
four ounces of white soap.
When the fever is slight, the cough strong, and appetite good, Sau-
berg advises not to bleed, aia the same applies to old and weak animals,
especially cows liable to abort, &c. He still persists in the tartarized
antimony, and gives it with from ten to sixty grainsof assafcetida, and an
ounce of powdered juniper berries, twice daily in water. Bitter herbs,
oil of turpentine, camphor, tar water, arnica, fennel, &c., are remedies
suggested.
A wise precaution is insisted on by Sauberg, and that i is to avoid a
profuse and debilitating purgation.
The practice recommended by Delafond and Sauberg has very largely
been carried out and recommended by other authors, such as Kreutzer,
Roll, &e., even of late. R6ll adds to the treatment by bleeding, tartar
emetic, &e., the administration, in cachectic and feeble animals, of sul-
phate of iron with tar water, or of alum, tannin, mineral acids, and
other tonics.
In England many practitioners have resorted to various methods of
treatment. It is long since the practice of blood-letting has been done
away with, but the advocates of setons, and more particularly of active
blisters, such as croton oil, cantharides, tartar emetic ointment, still
exist. Small doses of calomel and tartar emetic, stimulating draughts
containing creosote, turpentine, sulphuric ether, carbonate of ammonia,
and alcohol, have been more generally employed. Mineral acids, the
administration daily of dilute sulphuric acid especially, and an early
resort to mineral and vegetable tonics, have found their advocates. Of
late years the tincture of aconite has been vaunted as a febrifuge, and
largely used, and some have tried Indian hemp and other narcoties.
Anything and everything has been tried, and without much reasoning
or careful record of results. The important feature salient in the his-
tory of pleuro-pneumonia in England, is that all the therapeutic skill of
the veterinarian has not prevented greater and more general losses,
than have ever been witnessed in other countries, if we may except
Holland.
For some years I have noticed that the earlier lesions of the lung dis-
ease partake, in their character and results, more of the features of hem-
orrhage—a prostrating discharge from the blood vessels of a. sero-albumi-
nous product—than of inflammation. The congestion and inflammation are
truly secondary, and once developedit is apparently impossible to control
them, though their extent varies greatly. In some animals but a portion of
one lung is involved, in others, one entire organ is affected, and in others,
which cases are almost without exception fatal, both lungs become hepa-
tized, and the animal dies sooner or later of apnoea or suffocation.
Notwithstanding the well-founded objection of some distinguished
veterinarians to the practice of administering mineral astringents as
i _
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 49
preservatives—an objection to which Professor Nicklas gave utterance
at the first international veterinary congress held in Hamburg in 1863—
it is certain that they far surpass all other means in the treatment of the
early stages of the lung plague. Professor Nicklas said with much truth
that where pleuro-pneumonia appeared there were often persons who pre-
scribed sulphate of iron to check the progress of the disease; the isola-
tion of such cattle was not attended to, and the malady continued.
Whereas if the sick were isolated, or slaughtered, and the remaining
animals of a herd inoculated, there would be an end to the outbreak.
But, on the other hand, if attention be paid to the segregation of the
sick, and those indubitably free from the disease were inoculated, there _
is still a number, and often not a small one, sure to die within a month
or six weeks, simply because inoculated too late. These animals, if
of great value, and proper facilities are afforded for treatment without
incurring the risk of extensions of the malady, may often be treated
with success.
Thermometer in hand, a good observer and auscultator can detect,
some days—and even as long as ten days or a fortnight—before marked
symptoms appear, the invasion of this disease. At that stage the
peculiar yellow deposit which first slowly invades the interlobular tissue
of the lungs is penetrating into the organ, and its extension may, as I
have noticed frequently, be checked by active internal astringents. The
best of these are the sesquichloride and the sulphate of iron. But our
choice extends further, since vegetable infusions or decoctions contain-
ing tannin, besides the astringent preparations of lead, may likewise
retard and arrest the exudation.
I have on several occasions been called to prescribe for herds in which
I have readily traced cases of pleuro-pneumonia in advanced stages of
the disease. I have removed the marked symptoms, and still a large
proportion of the animals had the peculiar cough so well noticed by the
French commission, yet to have neglected means to arrest the disease
would have resulted in many deaths. Before I was led to approve, as I
do strongly, of the practice of inoculation, and since when there have
been insuperable obstacles to its adoption, I have placed all the herd,
sometimes in the stable and at other times in the open field, on regular
daily doses of sulphate of iron, allowing about half a drachm or a
drachm to a bullock, mixed with a similar amount of bruised coriander
seeds, and perhaps some bran, the better to disguise the iron. Thus
mixed with fresh coriander seeds, cattle will leave grass to eat the
medicine, and I have uniformly found a mitigation of the cough, a dis-
appearance of the malady, and the herds have preserved an admirable
condition.
I can confirm Sauberg’s statement that it is dangerous to resort to
active purgatives, and the common symptom, even in the earlier stages
of pleuro-pneumonia, of constipation, can be better corrected by diet and
the administration of a stimulant, such as carbonate of ammonia, com-
4
50 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
bined with warm water injections, than by any other plan. When the
exudation in the lung tissue is not checked, and in all cases where it has
advanced too far to admit of being checked by capillary astringents, it
is, as a rule, desirable to leave animals entirely to nature.
The observation of many hundred cases for the past fifteen years has
convinced me that, left entirely to themselves, when the malady has
fairly developed, a considerable proportion of the cattle affected in one
lung recover, whereas nearly all those affected on both sides die. The
many methods of treatment recommended have not seemed to increase
the usual average number of cases of one-sided pluero-pneumonia which
generally recover.
It is extremely difficult to ascertain the conditions under which a
small or a great mortality may be anticipated. This may be gleaned
from the observations of the French commission. They found some
animals which apparently resisted the disease. - These were doubtless
latent cases, as they afterwards resisted contagion. If this be admitted,
the mortality amounted to thirty per cent. of the animals affected, and
this mortality is infinitely less than that observed frequently under cir-
cumstances which would appear most favorable to the health of cattle
and their resistance to disease.
It has been seen that as far back as 1769 fumigations were recom-
mended for the treatment of pleuro-pneumonia. Of late years carbolic
acid has been strongly recommended for this purpose, and may prove
beneficial. Its internal administration failed many years ago, when, under
the name of ereosote—for much of our foreign creosote is carbolic acid—it
was used especially by a distinguished English veterinarian, Mr. Charles
Hunting, of Feme Houses, near Durham. The employment of anti-
septics comes properly under the head of preventive measures, which
are considered in a subsequent section of this report.
Notwithstanding the many authorities in favor of blisters, setons,
rowels, and even the hot iron, I must assert, from careful observation,
that in the acute stages of the disease they invariably aggravate the
malady and sometimes kill. There are instances which indicate the
contrary, for when examining cases in Pennsylvania I was told by a
farmer that his cattle were dying, and he called in a professional man
who blistered severely and eured several. They would probably have
recovered if left to nature, though it is possible that in some cases
counter-iritants may be useful. The difficulty is to choose those cases ;
and, as a rule, I am satisfied that any but the mildest stimulants applied
to the skin irritate and do harm.
It is highly important that any medicines given to cattle with this
disease should be given carefully, to avoid choking. Farmers are often
very rough in giving drenches to cattle. They should go up to the off
shoulder of the animal, pass the left hand in the angle of the mouth
on the left side, draw the head around gently, without unduly elevating
it, and pour the draught out of a small horn in moderate quantities,
ms
THE LUNG PLAGUE. : 51
giving the animal time to swallow. I remember, as far back as 1851,
being asked by a Yorkshire veterinarian to prepare a number of
draughts, the active agent of which was carbonate of ammonia, for a
herd of cows affected with the lung disease. The draughts were sup-
plied to the farmer, and the very first day they were being administered
by himself and servants, according to order, in gruel, a messenger sum-
moned me to attend an animal which had been killed by the medicine.
On arriving at the farmer’s, I perceived from the animal’s breathing,
tremors, difficulty in standing, anxious expression of countenance, pro-
truding and biood-shot eye-balls, that it was choking. I informed the
farmer of the fact that the drench had been poured the wrong way, and
since he was indignant at the declaration, I opened the trachea with my
penknife, and in a fit of coughing a quantity of gruel, smelling strongly
of ammonia, was forcibly ejected. This alone saved the reputation of the
medicine and its compounder.
INOCULATION OF THE LUNG PLAGUE.
Tn 1836 pleuro-pneumonia was imported from Flanders among cattle
fed at the distillery of Messrs. Willems & Platel, at Hasselt, in Bel-
gium. The town was rich in horned stock, and the malady formed one
of its fixed stations, and continued uninterrnptedly from 1836 to 1852.
Dr. Didot* ascertained beyond a doubt, by personal inquiries among the
Hasselt distillers, that this was a fact, and that the disease had never
been absent from their stables during these sixteen years. The Belgian
government had adopted a partial system of slaughter to stamp out the
disease; but the indemnity was small, and the distillers found it more
profitable to sell their cattle to butchers; and the inhabitants of Hasselt,
Liége, Louvain, Terlemont, Brussels, and Antwerp, were supplied with
a large amount of diseased meat. Dr. Didot learned that whereas goy-
ernment officials slaughtered one or two per cent. of the infected ani-
mals, the butchers purchased and disposed of fifteen, twenty, or twenty-
five animals per week, according to the extent of the outbreaks. In the
town of Hasselt alone it is computed by the same authority that 16,540
head of sick cattle were consumed during the above period. The gov-
ernment paid one-third of the value of 845 head of cattle during the same
period. So late as 1851 M. Maris, one of the government veterinary
surgeons at Hasselt, saw 1,300 cases of lung disease in that city alone.
From 1840 to 1850+ the value of the horned stock lost by pleuro-pneu-
monia in Belgium amounted to 2,531,409 franes and 30 cents. The sum
paid by the government in indemnities amounted to 1,751,777 franes and
40 cents. The disease continued unabated in 1851 and 1852. Every
effort had been made by the: distillers to arrest the disorder—ventila-
* Deux Jours 4 Hasselt. Essai sur L’Inoculation de la Pleuro-pneumonie Exsudative
des Bétes Boyines. Bruxelles, 1853.
t Rapport décennal de 1840 4 1850. Résumé statistique. Page 10.
52 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
tion, fumigation, whitewashing, turning the cattle out for a period, the
placing pigs in the stables, under the impression that they might destroy
the putrid materials supposed to engender the disease, and so on.
It so happened that the son of the senior member of the first firm of
distillers whose cattle had been affected in 1836 had devoted himself to
medicine. Dr. Willems studied the lung disease with discrimination,
but even so late as 1850 he had not fully made up his mind as to the
essentially contagious character of pleuro-pneumonia. Dieterichs had
attempted the inoculation of the disease in order to prove its contagious
character, and had failed. Vix repeated the experiments, and obtained
results in the form of pneumonia, a pneumonia, says Dr. Willems,* due
in all probability to purulent infection. The French commission inocu-
lated cows with the blood, nasal discharge, and excrementitial fluids, in
order to test the contagious properties of pleuro-pneumonia. Dr. Wil-
lems had, moreover, observed that in his father’s stables there had been
since 1836 over 500 animals that had suffered from pleuro-pneumonia, a
considerable number of which had recovered, and remained ever after
free from the disease. Yvart, Lafosse, Verheyen, and Pétry had made
similar observations. These facts led Dr. Willems to institute a series
of experiments as to the possibility of communicating the disease by
inoculation, and the extent, if any, of the immunity thus secured to cat-
tle.
Dr. Willems adopted the rational plan of performing experiments on
animals of different species. His first was as follows:
Date. Material inoculated. Animal inoculated. Seat of inoculation. | Result.
4 ((thigheesee eee None.
Dec. 23, 1850.) Pulmonary exudation.........- Three rabbits. -...--......- J ING Sec oboos er aace None.
AUN GoesbS Sao" None.
Feb. 10, 1851.) Nasal discharges. ...........--- Tyo TaD Pits msteya'e = iaalaeleiale WEG saG gopeo asco None.
| Intestinal tubercle squeezed in | One rabbit...-... .--.---.-. BUNS See Bh. aoc None.
, sirup.
June 19, 1851-| Pulmonary exudation.....-.--- Twelve pea fowls....--..-- Dhieh ss sss0 eee None.
DO ssacinccwetece sioeelcs hlemene Several chickens.-.-...-.--. Ui alleen sae Gems None.
1D Som anopseiae AooHor:abomcc One dogy-se- se a aas seine ores AUT Sep ear oeecor None.
Docies S.-i ee ee TWO Ontss sce eeeieceememee Jie Gasqonaonsecec None.
ID) Sones enade dose sesbec WOneysheepee ance ceeeerieamt SUE eSggoseeenecs None.
ID Bosasacasssian sone eee see One English pig.--..--.--. Wal =) in. 2-2 None.
MOet ect ete o eee Bs55ce Three Belgian pigs..-.-..-.. Rat eos sales 32 eee None.
July 16, 1851.) Pulmonary exudation.........-. @uetsheepaene eee eerie 4 BRR ECS Ho aor None.
IW O)sgonue Geese coe cosocoopar One ams. pees seein Thal) oe 22 = nice Ree None.
IDG odscodloedannsede anonede QneKdoR eee senaeee eee alles sacha None.
LDQ 5554S aed Ba mesopeeesopeaS Eight pea fowls..........-.. Tail: 5 2c Serene None.
| A WONG G Ps: bpaion oo5d0Eeq5eE Tail. aeeeeeeeee None.
eb. 26, 1852.| Liquid from the lungs used to { y : ;
aa « Three Belgian pigs..-.--- Dail: ) Jee eee None.
pease Se SSRI | Three pea fowls.....----- Thigh ease dens None.
NOUN INOM saa sodssessoseoe MUA ssssd5 oboose None.
* Mémoire sur la Péripneumonie Epizodtique du Gros Bétail, par L, Willems, Docteur
en Médicine & Hasselt, 19.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 53
Dr. Willems observed that inoculations which were usually accidental
in man were unattended by ill effects.
A second series of experiments was performed on cattle. The first
group of these was as follows:
Date. Material inoculated. Animal inoculated. | Seat of inoculation. Result.
Feb. 10, 1851.) Blood from sick bullock. .--. A small bullock....} Root of tail........ Slight inflammation.
Mucous from mouth of sick | A bullock ....-..-. Kootot tail: Joe <~ Slight inflammation.
bullock.
Intestinal tubercle broken | A bullock .....---.- Root of tail........ Slight inflammation.
up in sugar and water
Pulmonary liquid......--.. J js a Sanscoe Root of tail.....-.. Slight inflammation.
The second group of observations is indicated below:
Date. Material inoculated. Animal inoculated. | Seat of inoculation.
|
Root of tail.
With two punctures on the nose.
March 5, 1851-| Pulmonary exudation ........--. Two lean bullocks --..
Pulmonary exudation.....--..--. Five lean bullocks -...-
Fifteen days after the inoculation small tumors were observed at the
root of the tail, so as to cause this organ to be slightly raised. In one
the tumor speedily disappeared; in the other the swelling enlarged,
became very hard, attained the size of ahen’s egg, was situated between
the anus and the root of the tail, and yielded gradually, without suppu-
rating, to scarifications and a saline purgative.
Of the five other bullocks four showed no signs; the fifth, three weeks
after the inoculation, manifested a swelling of the head on the operated
side. Two incisions were made, emollients applied, and a purgative
administered. Low diet was also prescribed. _Onthe 20th of April the
whole side of the head was swollenand almost of scirrhous hardness.
Two deep incisions were made without finding pus. In the nose, at the
point where the inoculation was performed, was a wound of unhealthy
aspect from which a sanious pus was discharged. The ox grew lean. On
the 17th of May a little pus flowed from the two incisions made on the
20th of April; afterwards much pus flowed from these incisions, as well
as shreds of areolar tissue and portions of dead skin. The tumor was
subsiding. On the 22d of May a fluctuating tumor appeared below the
jaws, from which much indolent-looking pus escaped. From that moment
the ox began to thrive, notwithstanding that the suppurations continued
till the 5th of June. By the 10th of June recovery was complete. Dr,
Willems despaired for several days of this animal’s return to health, and
he resolved not to inoculate again in the same region.
THIRD GROUP OF OBSERVATIONS.
On the 10th of May Dr. Willems inoculated nine Dutch bullocks and
two lean Belgian cows. He made two punctures in the tail of each and
54 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
used blood expressed from the muscles and liquid squeezed out of the
lung of a cow suffering under the third stage of pleuro-pneumonia.
Several bullocks showed the effects of inoculation by the 19th of May ;
two more severely than the rest. On the 21st of May there was a decided
swelling of the tail in six bullocks and one cow. Incisions were made to
relieve the parts, emollients applied, and purgatives administered.
On the 26th of May seven out of the nine bullocks and one cow pre-
sented considerable tumefaction at the root of the tail; incisions and
emollients were resorted to. On the 31st of May the swelling of the
parts inoculated disappeared, and the animals regained their appetite and
vivacity. :
Two of the nine bullocks by this time suffered much; the root of the
tail, the tissues around the anus, and the nates, were consolidated and
enlarged by a deposit. In spite of all efforts, the free excision of the ma-
terial so as to produce an artificial anus, the obstacle to defecation was so
great, the straining so violent and constant, and the vital powers sunk so
low, that on the 8th of June they died. Dr. Willems observed that in
incising these tumors the animals suffered no pain.
On the 9th of June these animals were dissected. One presented a
general health of the internal organs. The lesions were localized in the
anal region. The muscles and other tissues around were of a pale red
color, interspersed by degenerated tissue. There wasnosuppuration. The
anus and its surroundings for at least twelve inches in diameter appeared
gangrenous. The lungs were of dark color, slightly congested, and pre-
senting but the slightest trace of marbled hepatization. The gall blad-
der was found full of black dense bile. There was slight serous effusion
in the peritoneum, and the mucous lining of the intestines presented red
or brown punctiform discolorations and some patches of red injection.
In the second bullock the lesions were more extensive. The mortifi-
cation of tissues extended up the rectum a distance of six inches. The
peritoneum was inflamed, in some parts adherent by its opposing sur-
faces, and a reddish serosity was effused in its cavity. The liver was
softened, degenerated, of a light yellowish color. The mucous membrane
of the tongue and windpipe was of adark brown color. The lungs were
black, flaccid, and in the pleural sacs was a citrine-colored serous
exudation. In the general disorganization of the organs of this animal
the most interesting feature was a number of cysts, with delicate walls,
distended by a dried homogeneous material similar to that inclosed in
the intestinal tubercles of animals that die of pleuro-pneumonia. Some
of these little saccules were in the folds of the peritoneum, but the major-
ity, at least sixty, were in the thorax and on the internal surface of the
ribs.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 55
FOURTH GROUP OF OBSERVATIONS.
Alarmed by the foregoing results, Dr. Willems determined on attempt-
ing inoculation at the tip of the tail, as follows:
Date. Material used. Animals inoculated. Beer eect
June 19, 1851.| Pulmonary exudation from an animal in the | Five lean Belgian bullocks...) Tip of tail.
first stage of disease. |
Pulmonary exudation from an animal in the | One Dutch bullock........... | Tip of tail.
first stage of disease.
Pulmonary exudation from an animal in the | One calf two months old...... | Tip of tail.
. first stage of disease. he
Pulmonary exudation from an animal in the | One ealf three months old....| Tip of tail.
first stage of disease.
On the 30th of June a slight swelling was observed in the parts inocu-
lated, with the exception of one bullock and two calves. The symptoms
of inflammation advanced, and on the 22d of July the tip of the tail of
four bullocks was completely gangrenous and detached. From that
moment the animals improved.
FIFTH GROUP OF OBSERVATIONS.
: | ; : Seat of inocu-
Date. Material used. Animals inoculated. lati Result.
ation.
June 26, 1851.| Pulmonary exudation | Twelve indigenous bul-| Tip of tail-..| Slight swelling on the 26th
y
from animal in first | locks. of July, and speedy re-
stage of disease. covery.
Pulmonary exudation | Two heifers -......---. | Tip of tail.
from animal in first
stage of disease.
SIXTH GROUP OF OBSERVATIONS.
Date. Material used. Animals inoculated. Seat of inoculation.
July 16, 1851.) Pulmonary liquid........-....... Twelve lean bullocks............ Tip of tail.
Wor as ccese cece cicse = eeeciee Onetherfer saesnmes easter Tip of tail.
ID Wo Secu puopoceDoosceAaasoaus OnesDutehibulles. see sas eee Tip of tail.
1D sGacossashdacens onaccee Avealf four days old: -- 25 ------ Tip of tail.
On the 24th of July four showed swelling of the tail; on the 29th all
had the enlargement, and on the 10th of August Dr. Willems ampu-
tated the tail-tips of four.
56
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
SEVENTH GROUP OF OBSERVATIONS.
Date. Material used.
Animals inoculated. | Seat of inoculation.
Aug. 18, 1851.| Pulmonary liquid from a buliock
in third stage of disease.
Pulmonary liquid from a bullock
in third stage of disease.
Pulmonary liquid from a bullock
in third stage of disease.
Pulmonary liquid from a bullock
Seven lean two-year old bullocks. Tip of tail.
|
One Dutch milch cow.......----- | Tip of tail.
Fourteen lean bullocks, from three | Tip of tail.
to four years old. |
One Belgian milch cow ..----.--- | Tip of tail.
in third stage of disease. |
On the 9th of September the Dutch cow and two bullocks presented
the first symptoms, and all the rest showed signs on the 14th, and after-
wards recovered.
EIGHTH GROUP OF OBSERVATIONS.
Date. Material used. Animals inoculated. Seat of inoculation.
Noy. 16, 1851.| Pulmonary exudation from a bul- | Four small indigenous cows .-..--.- Tip of tail.
lock in the first stage, and kept
ten days to note if it lost its
properties.
Ten days after the inoculation the first symptoms of specific inflam-
mation appeared, and all recovered.
NINTH GROUP OF OBSERVATIONS.
Date. Material used. Animals inoculated. Seat of inoculation.
Jan. 19, 1852.| Pulmonary exudation from cow | Five Belgian bullocks.-.--...-.-. Tip of tail.
in third stage of the disease.
One Dutch bullock......--.------ Tip of tail.
On the 2d of February the greater part of these animals showed
signs of the inoculation, and afterwards recovered.
One animal on the 3d of February had a swelling in the upper part of
the right hind limb. The tumor increased and the animal suffered in-
tensely. Incisions, emollients and purgatives were resorted to as usual.
By the 8th of February the swelling had invaded nearly the whole of the
right hip, pushed the tail to the left, and the anus was partly occluded
so as to cause difficulty in defecation. The animal died on the 10th.
Post-mortem appearances indicated little else beyond the thickening of
the skin and subcutaneous tissues of the right hip. There was some
discoloration of the intestines, flaccid appearance of muscles, and dark
color of lungs, but no specific appearances in internal organs.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 57
TENTH GROUP OF OBSERVATIONS.
Date. Material inoculated. Animals inoculated, Seat of inoculation
Jan. 30, 1852.) Pulmonary exudation in first stage | Four old lean but strong Dutch | Tip of tail.
of disease. bullocks.
Two presented swelling on the 12th of February, and recovered; the
others showed no signs.
ELEVENTH GROUP OF OBSERVATIONS.
Date. Material inoculated. Animals inoculated. Seat of inoculation.
Feb. 26, 1852 | Pulmonary exudation from bul- | Six lean Dutch bullocks.....-...- Tip of tail.
lock in first stage.
Pulmonary exudation from bul- | Six fine Belgian steers -...-....-. Tip of tail.
lock in first stage.
Pulmonary exudation from bul- | One Dutch heifer ......-..-.----- Tip of tail.
lock in first stage.
Pulmonary exudation from bul- | One indigenous cow.
lock in first stage.
From the 13th to the 20th of March the effects of the inoculations were
developed. Only one animal of the first group lost a little of its tail.
Dr. Willems proceeded further. On the 19th of June, 1851, he inoc-
ulated several cattle with the liquid expressed from healthy lungs with-
out producing any effect. He then inoculated a bullock that had pre- 2
viously had the disease, and witnessed no results except a little enlarge-
ment at the seat of the puncture in one case. On the 28th of August,
1851, he reinoculated a bullock that had been operated on six or seven
months previously and had lost his tail; and did the same with two small
COWS.
On the 19th of January, 1852, he reinoculated three large bullocks,
and on the 26th of February three other bullocks, the whole of which
had been successfully operated on before.
Fifty cattle that had not been inoculated were mixed in a stable with
those referred to, and with the following result:
In the month of May, 1851, three bullocks sickened; on the 22d of
June a fourth case; on the 26th a fifth; on the 26th of July a seventh;
and at different dates up to the 10th of March, 1852, seventeen of the
new inoculated animals had suffered, and were sold for slaughter, whereas
the other thirty-three doubtless had a latent form of the malady.
The conclusions drawn by Dr. Willems were as follows:
1. Pleuro-pneumonia is not contagious by inoculation of the blood or
other matters taken from diseased animals and placed upon healthy
ones.
58 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
2. By the method that I employed, one hundred and eight beasts
were preserved from pleuro-pneumonia, while of fifty beasts placed in
the same stables and not inoculated, seventeen became diseased, and
the disease is now banished from these stables, which had never been
free from it since 1836.
3. The inoculation of the disease itself, performed.in the manner that
I have described, whether it may have occasioned apparent morbid
manifestations or not, was the measure that preserved the animals from
pleuro-pneumonia.
4. The blood and the serous and frothy liquid squeezed from the lungs
of a diseased animal in the first stage of pleuro-pneumonia is the most
suitable matter for inoculation.
5. The inoculation-of the virus takes from ten days to a month before
it manifests itself by sensible symptoms.
6. The matter employed for the inoculation has, in general, no effect
upon an animal previously inoculated or having had the disease.
7. The inoculated animal braves the epizoétic: influences with impu-
nity, and fattens better and more rapidly than those in the same atmo-
sphere with it that have not been inoculated.
8. The inoculation should be performed with prudence and circum-
Spection upon lean animals in preference, and towards the tenth day
atter the operation a saline purge may be given, and repeated if neces-
sary.
9. By inoculating pleuro-pneumonia a new disease is produced; the
affection of the lungs, with all its peculiar characters, is localized in
some sort on the exterior.
10. The virus obtained from oxen affected with pneumonia is of a na-
ture entirely specific; it does not always act as a virus; the bovine race
alone is affected by its inoculation, while no other animals of different
races, inoculated in the same manner, and with the same liquid, experi-
ence any ill effects.
Dr. Willems accomplished-much in his earlier experiments, as will be
seen by comparing the knowledge of the present day with the results of
his original investigations. One cause contributed to strengthen the
hands of his adversaries, and this was attempting to prove that specific
and characteristic elements distinguished the virus of pleuro-pneumonia.
Dr. Willems says: . ,
IT have examined various pathological specimens with the object of studying and
elucidating the question of inoculation, My investigations have been principally
directed to diseased lungs, and to a kind of tubercle hitherto overlooked, but which I
have, nevertheless, constantly met with upon opening the dead bodies of animals that
died from pleuro-pneumonia. These tubercles, scattered throughout the intestines, but
principally in the lesser one, are of a size varying from the head of a pin to that of a
large pea, of a yellowish or greenish color; they are seated in the submucous cellular
tissue, and partly in the thickness of the mucous membrane of the intestine. They do
not appear to have any relation with the glands of Peyer or of Brunner. Are they
hypertrophied follicles? Nothing appears to prove it; no opening is perceived in them.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 59
They are formed of a homogeneous, whitish matter, more or less. hard, showing under
the microscope granulous kernels and an innumerable quantity of small elementary
corpuscles, which enjoy a molecular motion, and which are also met with in diseased
lungs. I have examined under the microscope parts of the lings of animals diseased
with pneumonia, with a power magnifying four hundred and fifty diameters, which is
higher than that employed by Professor Gluge in his beautiful anatomico-pathological
researches upon pleuro-pneumonia. The exudated matter presented no structure. I
met with no other anatomical elements than granular cells and elementary corpuscles,
provided with a particular motion, the whole pretty much resembling an inflammatory
exudation, remarkable for its great quantity. The plastic exudation is formed in so
rapid a manner, and in such considerable quantity, that anatomical elements of a
superior development to that of these cells could not be produced in them; conse-
quently no cells or globules of pus (I have never found any) or fibers are ever met with
there. The energy of the cellular tissue appears to exhaust itself upon too large a
quantity of exudated matter for the latter to be carried to a higher degree of organiza-
tion. It is the same as is observed sometimes in the regeneration of tissues; in the
section of nerves, for example, and in the fracture of bones, when the exuded liquid
is in too large a quantity, or the fragments are too much separated, a part of the
liquid being beyond the circle of action of the energy of existing tissues, always
remains at an inferior degree of development to that of the neighboring tissues. What
is most important to be shown here, and of which no one has hitherto spoken, is the
existence in diseased lungs of small corpuscles, endowed with a molecular motion,
which appears sometimes to be made in a given direction. They are like corpuscles in
process of formation, the motion of which resembles that of the granules of pigment,
as well as those which surround the corpuscles of the tuberculous matter in man. In
all my microscopical researches I have constantly found the same.
Wishing to know whether these corpuscles exist in any other substances than those
already examined, I submitted to the microscope—
1. The saliva of a healthy ox under epizobtic influence.
. The saliva of a diseased cow towards the third stage of the disease.
. The urine of the same cow.
. The blood of the same cow.
. The blood of a healthy ox under epizoétic influence for five months.
. The blood of a healthy ox not under epizodtic influence.
. Parts of the liver and of the large right pectoral muscle from a diseased cow.
In none of these matters did I find the small corpuscles with molecular motion, which I
have constantly met with in the lungs and in the intestinal tubercles of animals affected
with pleuro-pneumonia. That, then, is the principal seat of the disease. Are these cor-
puscles primitive or consequent on the disease? This question cannot be decided now ;
I only wish here to verify their presence in pleuro-pneumonia.
I examined with the microscope parts of the skin of an ox that died of inoculation.
I there found the same microscopical elements and the same chemical characters as in
the lungs diseased with pneumonia.
Professor Gluge, one of the members of the Belgian commission
appointed to inquire into the efficacy of inoculation, reported, on the
10th of July, 1852, as follows:
It results, from the demonstrations made by Dr. Willems and our own researches—
1. That epizoétie pleuro-pneumonia has no characteristic anatomical products appre-
2
3
4
5
6
7
ciable by the microscope.
2. That the inflammatory product is not distinguished from any other product of
inflammation by anatomical character.
3. That M. Willems’s assertions are not accurate.
4. That this circumstance, doubtless unfortunate, does not in any way prejudice the
practical question, which it appears to me ought to be especially examined,
60 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
But Professor Verheyen, who was the president of this commission,
continued until his death to throw discredit on the preservative efficacy
of inoculation, and though he based most of his conclusions on hypo-
theses, he was ready to avail himself of everything that presented itself
to strengthen his position.
Three commissions were almost simultaneously at work to ascertain
the merits of Dr. Willems’s discovery.
The first in Holland, appointed on the 17th of April, 1852, consisted
of the director and professors of the veterinary school at Utrecht.*
From the 14th of June, 1852, to the 9th of July following, the com-
mission inoculated for fourteen proprietors two hundred and forty-seven
head of cattle of various ages and condition. In this number there were
one hundred and fifty-four milch cows, six young cows that had not yet
calved, thirty-two heifers, and fifty-five calves. The phenomena of the
operation were not manifested at once onall the beasts that were subjected
toit. The proportions between the inoculation and its consequences are
nearly constant in milch cows and heifers; they are found to be about
as three to two. In calves, on the contrary, the proportion is less; it is
as four anda quarter to one. A great difference was observed in the effects
on cattle of different proprietors. Thus, out of thirteen milch cows
belonging to Degroot, four only experienced the consequences, while
with the cattle belonging to Wynen, it was successful in eighteen out of
twenty; and yet the matter used for the inoculation at these two farms
came from the same lung. Other similar variations were observed,
and were not attributed exclusively by the commission to a greater or
less predisposition to pleuro-pneumonia. They thought it more proba-
ble explanation of the fact that the disease, raging with greater vio-
lence and upon a greater number of beasts in one stable than another,
existed in germ at the time of inoculation, although there were no symp-
toms to indicate it. Thence it was, then, that with one exception
pleuro-pneumonia caused the greatest losses to the proprietors on whose
cattle the inoculation took least. The inoculated beasts that the com-
mission had to report on as having been attacked by pleuro-pneumonia,
were sixteen in number. Although this figure, they say, is pretty con-
siderable, it proves in no wise to the disadvantage of the preservative
power of the inoculation; for it was to be expected that cases of pleuro-
pneumonia, more or less numerous, would present themselves among
the cattle subjected to the operation, since they had been stabled with
infected animals, and at the time of performing it there were still several
affected with the disease. “ We cannot omit to state,” adds the reporter,
‘that upon none of these animals was the inoculation succeeded by local
phenomena.” The opinion of those who thought that pleuro-pneumonia
acquires by inoculation a milder character, and terminates more favor-
ably, was not confirmed; the greater number of the animals attacked.
* Further papersrespecting pleuro-pneumonia in cattle, presented to the British House
Ss] ;
of Commons by command of her Majesty, December 6, 1852.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 61
perished. The operation had not the least influence upon the beasts.
which, at the time it, was performed, were evidently affected with pleuro-
pneumonia. Several beasts that were known for some time to have been
affected with pleuro-pneumonia experienced not the least effect from
the inoculation.
The report from which the above has been extracted bears the date
of the 21st of September, 1852, and the results are indicated by the
annexed table.
The second report, bearing date of the 28th of December, 1852, and
prepared by the same commission, furnishes facts recorded in oe sub-
joined table.
The conclusions drawn from the experiments were summarized as fol-
lows:
1. Although the inoculation of pleuro-pneumonia is not, in all respects,
an inoffensive operation—as extensive derangements and even death
may result from it—its-effects are generally confined to the part where
it has been applied.
2. In order to prevent, as much as possible, its unfavorable conse-
quences, it is necessary to use some precaution, both in the selection of
the matter for inoculation and the period of its application. The sea-
son, the atmospheric circumstances, the state of nutrition, exert consid-
siderable influence upon the success. The autumn appears, for more
than one reason, to be the most suitable period.
3. When an intense action and serious casualties appear locally and
in the more distant organs, they may be attributed to exterior cireum-
stances and to the individual constitution. This being the case, casu-
alties cannot always be avoided.
4, If serious complications appear and affect the essential organs so as
to cause the reaction of the whole organism, it is as difficult to prevent
them and arrest their progress as it is to cure pleuro- pneumonia.
5. In the violent cases, terminating in death, lesions in the thorax or
the lungs have never been met; hitherto they have always been concen-
trated in the abdominal cavity. ,
6. The inoculation produces no unfavorable effects either upon the
constitution or the yield of milk, while its action is limited to a local
affection. Only in the cases where abundant deposits succeed a too
intense local action do the animals continue sickly during some time.
7. The operation has not had a determined influence on the excitement
of strum. In proportion this has been more frequent on the inocu-
lated than on the uninoculated cows. It is, however, to be remarked
that No. 25 has not yet been in heat, although the period for it has long
‘since passed.
8. The return of the uterine heats with the two cows Nos. & and 12,
probably in consequence of abortion, can the less be referred to the inoc-
ulation, as these two cases are isolated, and the effects were not observed
62 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
in Nos. 19, 21, and 23, which were very markedly subject to sexual excite-
ment. ;
9. It cannot be determined with complete certainty whether the pre-
mature parturition of a cow near her time, (No. 10,) as well as the con-
secutive phenomena observed in the mother and the calf, are to be attrib-
uted to the inoculation; it is the same with the cow No. 14, which calved
before her time. These circumstances are, however, of a nature to dis-
courage the inoculation of females in an advanced stage of gestation.
10. As abortion is frequent in the course of pleuro-pneumonia, it can-
not be passed over in silence that this complication has never appeared
with the beasts that have suffered so seriously from the inoculation as
to sink under it. If, therefore, the operation has any influence upon ges-
tation, it can only be in the last stage.
11. The hypothesis, already proposed in our first report, that the evo-
lution of pleuro-pneumonia after the inoculation ought to be attributed
to the existence of the germ of the disease before the operation, notwith-
standing the absence of every morbid phenomenon, acquires a higher
degree of probability from our experiments.
12. The opinion of those who hold that cattle that have had pleuro-
pneumonia, and have recovered, do not contract it a second time, or at
least rarely, and that the inoculation is performed without success upon
these individuals, is again confirmed by No. 16, which was inoculated
twice, but in vain.
15. Our experiments furnish the remarkable proof that a power, at
least temporary, of securing against the contagion of pleuro-pneumonia
cannot be denied to the inoculation; it remains uncertain, however, to
what extent the predisposition to contract this disease is destroyed, either
entirely or for a limited time. Much time will be necessary, from the
very nature of the question, before a positive solution of it can be arrived.
at.
Verheyen, as president reporter of the Belgian commission, issued a
report dated Brussels, February 6, 1853. It opened in the following
terms :
In a first report, embracing the period from the 24th of May to the 15th of July, 1852,
it is stated that the commission had inoculated, either by the operations of its members
or under its supervision, 189 beasts of the bovine race of all ages and both sexes. Hight
herds, numbering 129 head, inhabited stables in which pneumonia had lately raged, or
was still raging at the time of the inoculation; eight other herds, composed of sixty
beasts, abode in healthy localities, or such as were considered healthy, forasmuch as
they had never been visited by the disease, or that the scourge had spared them at
least for the last eighteen months.
We made it appear—
1. That the operation had been followed by effects upon all the cattle inoculated.
2. That the matter had remained inert upon two cows that we knew to have escaped
from exudative pleuro-pneumonia. ;
3. That five cows had perished from the consequences of inoculation.
4. That two had lost the whole of their tails.
5. That six had partially lost them.
———
—_— Nee eee EL
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 63
6. That four caives had been seized with an articular affection.
7. That, contrary to Mr. Willems’s observations, the insertion of the matter in the
tails of calves produced a local affection there.
8. That finally, at the moment of dispatching that first report, M. Dele informed the
commission that a case of pleuro-pneumonia had just appeared at the Abbey of La
Trappe upon an inoculated cow.
The favorable situation certified on the 15th of July has been maintained, with but
one exception, for the individuals of those herds which the proprietors still possess.
The articular affection observed in four cows has not occurred again; therefore a sim-
ple coincidence must be admitted, and this casualty explained independent of inocu-
lation. °
The commission resolved on extending its operations, and this they
did by associating with themselves all the country veterinary practi-
tioners, in accordance with the organization of the civil veterinary ser-
vice in Belgium; and secondly, by undertaking a series of direct experi-
ments.
The government on its part did not remain inactive. It organized local commissions
charged with the supervision of the operations; the losses occasioned by the inocula-
tion were assimilated to those of animals slaughtered on account of public benefit ; it
undertook to pay the difference between the estimated price and the selling price of
the inoculated beasts, which, contracting exudative pleuro-pneumonia, should be sent by
their proprietors to the shambles, and of which the officers at the latter would make
declarations to the authorities.
Further on M. Verheyen says:
Wishing to free the inoculation from the numerous accessory questions which that
practice occasions, the commission adopted for its experiments, and submitted to the
minister of the interior for his sanction, this simple programme:
‘1. To purchase sound beasts ; to watch them during a certain time, in order to be
assured of the integrity of their pulmonary organs.
2. To request M. Willems to inoculate them.
3. Only to admit.as preserved those in which that physician should have recognized
the specific inflammation caused by a productive inoculation, and which he should have
pronounced to be in the enjoyment of the immunity.
4, To have the beasts cohabit with animals afflicted with exudative pleuro-pneumo-
nia, at the same time placing some inoculated animals in identical conditions.
A first batch of eight cows and heifers of Ardennes breed, selected in localities free
from exudative pleuro-pneumonia, arrived at the veterinary school. M. Willems inoc-
ulated them on the 16th of August; on the 11th of September, those numbered 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, and 8 were examined by M. Willems, who declared that the inoculation had suc-
ceeded in those beasts.
On the same day he inoculated eight other beasts purchased by M. Windelinex, on
account of the commission, at the fair of Tirlemont. We cannot affirm that they were,
like the preceding, from a locality free from pleuro-pneumonia ; we gained, however,
by a rigorous and repeated examination, the certainty that the thoracic organs were
intact. At the same sitting, M. Willems reinoculated the two Ardennes cows num-
bered 4 and 7.
All showing themselves still refractory on the 29th of September, M. Willems was
apprised of it; the letter was unanswered.
On the 10th of October an ox—that marked No. 2—of the herd that came from Tirle-
mont, exhibited a swelling at the end of the tail. That portion of the caudal append-
age being seized with dry mortification, was eliminated.
On the 18th October three members of the commission proceeded to a fresh inocu-
lation. They operated upon the Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5,7, and 8, from Tirlemont, and upon the
Ardennes cow No. 4.
64 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
The No. 7 of the latter breed, and the No. 6 of the former, were reserved.
Two of the Ardennes cows were successfully inoculated, Nos. 5 and 6, having been iso-
latedin astable, cohabited from the 24th of September with pneumonic beasts. When it
was certain that the operation had had a negative result upon the Ardennes cow No.
7, and after the cicatrization of the puncture, the same locality was assigned to it, on
the 1st of October, for abode. .
The ox No. 2, from Tirlemont, entered there on the 23d of October, and the heifer No.
6 on the 25th of the same month.
A third inoculation performed on the 18th of November, upon the beasts from Tirle-
mont, Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8, was not more efficacious that the preceding.
From the 24th of September, the date of the experiment, there has only occurred a
first space of one day, and a second of eight, during which the stable has not contained
pneumonic beasts; the number of the cattle has varied from one to three. Up to this
day the three inoculated beasts, and the two upon which the inoculation was unsuc-
cessful, have experienced no attack from the cohabitation with infected animals.
Two aged cows, inoculated by M. Willems, at Hasselt, entered the same locality on
the 15th of November.
On the 28th of September, two of the Ardennes beasts, Nos. 3 and 8, were dispatched
to Tirlemont to be placed in infected stables there, by the care and under the superin-
tendence of M. Windelinex.
A third experiment, intrusted to M. Dele, has been organized at Deurne, inthe prov-
ince of Antwerp. The superior of the abbey of La Trappe has been pleased to place
at the disposal of the commission, for this purpose, two heifers belonging to the com-
munity, and which were inoculated with the least equivocal success, on the 27th of
May, 1852.
On the 30th of October the Ardennes beasts Nos. 1, 2, and 4 were conducted to Huy,
where a fourth experiment is being carried out under the superintendence of MM. Mar-
cops and Guérin.
Not one of the animals inoculated, successfully or unsuccessfully, has contracted exu-
dative pleuro-pneumonia.
While these experiments were going on, fifty-four veterinary surgeons,
including Dr. Willems, inoculated 5,301 head of cattle. They consisted
in—
Beasts tattemimes | - 2220 2. 42 Site te sets See Pee eee 2, 732
ean oxen or milch cows...-.---..--'-- Haas pie Sic oe are 2,189
Walyes and youn Cable. oc. a. ae ote eee ee ee ei ee 380
OGAL S's he ccc » ope ciepe ener ee eke te See eae ee 5, 301
Beasts living in‘ healthy stables: 2. oo. see ee tee ee = 2, 330
Beasts living in infected ‘stables.”.\ 222. 2is22 2 vere = 2, 971
i ee err eee enemas cee AS. . em 5, 301
Beasts*suecesstully inoculated). 2 een - = 2'~ mee 4, 324
imvhealthy (stalled is. SE 2) ee A Uae che SR Se 2, 030
iin: infected. stableseed Ih. o0% 2 Ree ee. hoi 2, 294
Nogiall..-<,.. 5 Gnese Seee AS -pate, Sit pee Se = = 4, 324
Highty-six, including eleven beasts inoculated in the dewlap, died
from the consequences of the inoculation.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 65
Seventy-four lost the tail up to the root.
Three hundred and four lost it in part.
Seventy-three contracted exudative pleuro-pneumonia after having
been successfully inoculated.
After careful examination it resulted at fifty-five cases of exudative
pleuro-pneumonia, well attested, occurred upon beasts inoculated with
unequivocal success. The space of time which elapsed with these ani-
mals between the inoculation and the first appearance of the pneumonia
symptoms, varies 17 to 136 days.
After an elaborate analysis of cases in which the inoculation seems to
have been effectual, of others in which the operation and immunity
seemed to be coincidences, and lastly of those in which it was not pre-
servative, the commission concludes:
1. That the inoculation with the liquid extracted from a lung hepatized in consequence
of exudative pleuro-pneumonia, is not an absolute preservative against that disease.
2. That the phenomena succeeding the inoculation may occur several times upon the
same animal, whether it has or has not been affected with exudative pleuro-pneumonia,
and that the two affections may go on simultaneously in one and the same individual;
considerable derangements appear at the inoculated part, while the morbid action of
the lungs progresses towards a fatal termination.
As to the point whether inoculation really possesses a preservative virtue, and in
that case, in what proportion and for what duration it maintains the immunity in the
animals that have undergone it, this question can only be resolved by ulterior researches.
A summary of inoculations performed andresults obtained is appended
in a tabular form at the close of the report.
We now come to the, experiments of the French commission, and it
must not be forgotten that, in connection with the subject of the trans-
mission of the lung plague by contact, this commission had resorted to
inoculation independently of any suggestions on the part of Dr. Willems.
The general résumé, ably set forth by Professor Bouley, is regarded
up to the present day as having done much to diffuse a rational belief in
the efficacy of inoculation, and the experiments were conducted with
great care and skill.
Experiments were instituted by the commission—
First. To ascertain whether pleuro-pneumonia is susceptible of being
transmitted to healthy animals by the inoculation of blood, saliva, nasal
discharge, and excrementitial matters from animals affected with the
disease. ‘
Second. Have animals thus inoculated enjoyed any immunity against ,
the contagious influence of the lung plague?
Third. Is pleuro-pneumonia capable of being transmitted, in all its
forms and characteristic symptoms, to healthy cattle by the inoculation
of the liquid extracted from the lungs of a sick animal?
Fourth. In the case where inoculation of this liquid does not determine
on healthy animals an exact repetition of the form and symptoms of the
original disease, what are the local or general phenomena which result?
In what proportion and to what extent do these characters, more or less
severe, transmit themselves? How many animals die after inoculation?
5
66 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
How many recover their health after having been subjected to this test,
and under what conditions?
Fifth. Do the animals subjected to this proof of inoculation with pul-
monary liquid acquire the power of resisting the contagion of pleuro-
pheumonia?
The experiments made to solve the question whether pleuro-pneumonia
was contagious by the inoculation of the blood, saliva, nasal mucus, &e.,
having been performed only on six animals, the commission has not
deemed them sufficient in number to form the basis of any conclusion.
Nevertheless, it was thought right to mention that the two cows inocu-
lated with the nasal discharge, and subjected to the proof of contagion
by cohabitation, have not been affected with pleuro-pneumonia.
Experiments by inoculating the liquid from. the lungs of sick cattle
have been performed on fifty-four healthy animals, and under conditions
which indicated that these animals had never previously contracted the
disease. Of these fifty-four subjects inoculated none have shown symp-
toms of pleuro-pneumonia as the result of inoculation. On twenty-three
the effects of inoculation have only been indicated by a slight local and
well-circumscribed inflammation. On twenty-one the inflammation has
been very severe, very extensive, and complicated by gangrenous phe-
nomena which have led to the death of six subjects. Therefore the num-
ber of animals in which inoculation has been benignant has amounted to
61.11 per cent.; the proportion of those having gangrene after the oper-
ation, which resulted in the loss of a portion of the tail, was 27.77 per
cent.; lastly, the deaths attained 11.11 per cent. Thus 88.88 per cent.
of ‘the inoculated animals recovered, and 11.11 per cent. died.
Of the forty-eight subjects which came out of the inoculation safe and
healthy two died of accidents not induced by the operation, and thirty-
four were exposed for a period of five or six months to the direct inilu-
ence of contagion by cohabitation with twenty-four subjects that had not
been inoculated, and which had to serve as a means of comparison.
Twelve inoculated animals which had been placed in separate stables
to serve for ulterior experiments were not exposed to the direct contact
of such cattle, but were looked after by the same person who had charge
of the sick animals.
Only one of the forty-six animals inoculated, viz., about two per cent.,
became affected with pleuro-pneumonia, whereas of the twenty-four non-
inoculated animals fourteen, or fifty-eight per cent., suffered.
From these experiments the commission concludes:
1. The inoculation of the liquid extracted from the lungs of an animal
affected with pleuro-pneumonia does not transmit to healthy animals of
the same species the same disease—at all events, so far as its Seat is con-
cerned. ;
2. The appreciable phenomena which follow the inoculation are those
of a local inflammation, which is circumscribed and slight, on a certain
number of the animals inoculated; extensive and diffuse, with general
reaction proportioned to the local disease, and complicated by gangrenous
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 67
accidents, on another number of the inoculated animals, so that even death
may result.
3. The inoculation of the liquid from the lungs of an animal affected
with pleuro-pneumonia exerts a preservative influence, and invests the
economy of the larger number of animals subjected to its influence with
an immunity which protects them from the contagion of this malady
during a period which has yet to be determined, but which the experi-
ments quoted indicated, at all events, not to be less than six months.
Although, from the experiments of the commission, the losses per
cent. among the animals inoculated were greater than the losses by the
disease communicated by cohabitation, they ascribed this partly to the
imperfect means adopted in inoculating, and they do not overlook the
great deterioration of the animals which did not die after suffering from
the natural disorder. They recommended further trials, and that the
practice should be encouraged.
A mixed commission of the central society of medicine and the agri-
cultural committee of Lille instituted experiments on one thousand two
hundred and forty-five animals to determine the comparative effects of
inoculation of the pulmonary liquid of pleuro-pneumonia and of septic
matters. The inoculations with virus amounted to one thousand two
hundred and sixteen; of these nine hundred and seventy-eight succeeded
and two hundred and thirty-eight showed no visible effects. One hun-
dred and seventy-nine animals, or 14.72 per cent., lost a part of the tail;
seventeen, or 1.39 per cent., died; lastly, twenty-nine animals, or 2.38 per
cent., were seized with pleuro-pneumonia, and of these eight succumbed.
Twenty-nine head of cattle were inoculated with decomposing matter,
and only two without local effect resulting. Ten lost a portion of the
tail, viz., thirty-four per cent. Of these animals three caught pleuro-
pneumonia, and one of these died. The Lille committee regarded the
process and results of inoculation as involved in doubts and uncertainties.
In England attention was directed to inoculation by consuls from
abroad, and Professors Simonds and Morton were commissioned to pro-
ceed to Belgium, investigate the matter, and then to institute experi-
ments at home. The result obtained, after much too limited observation,
was pronounced against the practice. This sufficed to prevent the prac-
tice of the operation among veterinarians, and the London cow-feeders
alone resorted to the plan, in a very partial and imperfect manner.
I witnessed many bad results in 1854 and 1855, and a case which came
under my observation on the 4th of May, 1856, in which putrid matter
that had been kept in an ink-bottle for a long time was used, led me to
pronounce a somewhat cautious but adverse opinion on the Highland
Society’s transactions for that year.
My efforts were afterwards directed to an exposure of the evils of
indiscriminate sale of healthy and sick cattle in public markets, and
Tinsisted on the slaughter and isolation of sick and infected cattle. The
little support I received at home led me, in 1863, to call together the first
international veterinary congress, which was held in Hamburg, and
68 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
there I met veterinarians from all parts of Europe who had steadily per-
severed in the practice of inoculation and could furnish me with reliable
data. Itis impossible, and indeed it would be superfluous, to give a very
detailed account of the thousands and tens’of thousands of cases which
have led to the almost universal opinion that inoculation is the best
means in the majority of instances to check the ravages of pleuro-pneu-
monia. The observations have been made in all parts where pleuro-
pneumonia has appeared, though opposition to the practice is scarcely
overcome to the extent that is desirable.
The efforts of Professor Verheyen in Belgium and his many attacks
on Dr. Willems’s method, approved as they have been by some in that
country, only illustrate once more the adage that a man is not a prophet
in his own country. But Professor Thiervene, who was one of the original
Belgian commissioners, and at first among the decided skeptics, delivered
an address before the Royal Academy of Medicine in Brussels in 1866, in
reply to one by M. Boéns, who had attacked the practice of inoculation,
in which he vindicates Dr. Willems’s position. He indorses Professor
Saint Cyr’s remarks on the demonstration of a preservative influence by
the most accurate and extensive experiments, and shows that of the well-
informed in Belgium, who are acquainted with the characters of the con-
tagious pleuro-pneumonia, none now doubt that inoculation is a safe and
certain preservative.
Medical men, no less than veterinarians, have a duty to perform in
relation to this subject. Boards of health in cities and country districts
should take up the subject in connection with the sale of the meat and milk
of animals affected with pleuro-pneumonia. History shows that in those
countries, such as England, where the sale of the produce of these animals
has been most unrestricted, the traffic in such cattle has been so great as
to cause the most severe losses by the disease, and without intermission.
An objection to inoculation, which weighs in the case of human and
ovine small-pox, as well as rinderpest, is that the inoculated disease is
contagious, that the cohabitation of healthy with inoculated animals may
lead to extensions of the disorderly infection, and that the foci whence
the disease spreads are always on the increase. Such objections cannot
weigh against the inoculation for the lung plague, as the inoculated mal-
ady is not communicated except by reinoculation. My observations on
this point are very numerous, and I do not know of a single instance
recorded, during the seventeen years that inoculation has been exten-
sively practiced, in which contagion from inoculated animals has been
witnessed.
Another objection which has led, of late years, to the practice being
checked among the cow-feeders of Brooklyn, is the sloughing of the tail
and the animals splashing blood and matter from their sore tails into the
milk-cans. All this arises from the operation being performed by per-
sons who know nothing of the precautions to be used, and especially of
the proper selection and preservation of the virus. Accidents will hap-
pen; but out of nearly two thousand inoculations I have had a loss of less
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 69
than one per cent. by death, and under five, per cent. of the tails have
lost their tips. This includes my earlier trials, and the results would be
more favorable if I excluded them from my calculations.
PRECAUTIONS.
The prevention of pleuro-pneumonia by inoculation demands, therefore,
special attention, first, to the condition of herds operated on; second, selee-
tion of proper virus; third, the preservation of that virus from decom-
position; fourth, the proper performance of the operation.
First. As to the condition of stock, it may be said that at any season
and under any system of management, whether cattle are being grazed,
stall-fed, used for breeding purposes, or fattening for the butcher’s stall,
inoculation may be resorted to. It should be practiced so soon as there
is reason to believe a herd has been in danger of infection or actually
infected. The first case of well-marked lung plague on a farm or in a
dairy shed should be the starting point for careful isolation, and the
inoculation of all apparently healthy animals. The disease rarely mani-
fests all its virulence until the third month after the introduction of a sick
animal among a lot of cattle, but the longer the inoculation is delayed
the more likely is it that the operation will be performed on animals
during the stage of invasion of the natural disease, and the result is <
loss which is sometimes ascribed to the inefficacy of the preventive.
In cities where the lung plague has been rife for any length of time, and
it is necessary to make frequent purchases, although a great deal in. the
way of prevention may be effected by judicious purchases of animals in
healthy districts, it is best to resort regularly to inoculation. Dairymen
should strive to buy more cows at a time, and at regular intervals, instead
of picking up a chance bargain or making it a rule to go to the market
weekly, as has been often the custom in both England and America. It
matters not if the cow is about to calve or has just calved; nothing should
induce the dairyman or the farmer in an infected district to run a risk.
It is desirable to keep animals clean and well littered on straw or saw-
dust, as at times the tails that have been operated on are permanently
in excrement and urine, which may poison the wound with decomposing
matter.
Second. The selection of proper virus is a matter that should be
intrusted to veterinarians, who can detect the various stages of the dis-
ease. It is during the first stage of a mild case that the interlobular
tissue of the lung is found distended with a yellow gelatinous serum,
which is fluid so long as the lungs are hot, and is not readily contami-
nated by other inflammatory products and blood. When a large portion
of lung has been so far consolidated as to present an almost uniform dark
red or purplish color, it should be discarded, and especially in cases where
a piece of the organ has become gangrenous and detached, or where liquid
in the cavity of the chest and around the lungs is decidedly fetid. Micro-
scopic examination will indicate, by the presence of movable rods and
floating molecules, the putrefactive changes, and that should cause us to
70 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
discard any such source of virus. A clear pleural fluid is often very use-
ful for preservation, but perhaps greater reliance is to be placed on the
exudation of a piece of lung in the first stage of the malady. The lung
is placed on a tolerably wide strainer, or bits of wood, over a clean stone-
ware, glass, or porcelain dish or bowl; it is cut in various directions, and
a stout piece of cloth or flannel is placed over the whole to confine the
heat and prevent dust falling on the lung or liquid. It is better to place
the dish or bowl over a warm water or sand bath at 100°, so as to pre-
vent gelatinization. In a short time, according to the condition and
quantity of lung, a sufficient quantity of clear yellow-colored liquid is
obtained. Sometimes blood accidentally tinges the material, and this is
not necessarily a disadvantage.
The old plan of keeping pieces of lung to inoculate with, and bot-
tling up anything and everything to secure a fetid compound, which
was kept for months, must be regarded as the most certain means to
insure accidents as the results of inoculation.
Third. The preservation of the virus for periodic inoculations has
certainly been a desideratum. Had farmers and dairymen had the facil-
ities for procuring material which could be used with safety in their
stock, they would long since have tried a method that, even when badly
carried out, is beneficial to them. Dr. Sticker, of Cologne, has preserved
the virus in ‘hermetically-closed tubes containing from one to two
drachms. Oneofthese glasses is emptied into a small glass, and from one
to two parts of rain water added. This is not desirable. A plan has
occurred to me of utilizing the tubes referred to in Drs. Billings and
Surtis’s report, which I am sure wiil meet the requirements of the case.
Tubes about four inches in length, three-eighths of an inch in diameter,
and tapering at either end, are sealed at one end in a blow-pipe flame,
and then heated throughout their length to redness. The operation is
concluded by closing the other end in the same way. ‘The air in the
tube is rarefied, all germs of decay destroyed, and there is no difficulty
in further manipulations. When a proper quantity of liquid is obtained
one point of the tube is passed into it, the tip broken off, and the virus
is sucked in to fill the vacuum. A spirit lamp is held near the liquid
and the point of the tube transferred from this to the flame. By the
aid of a blow-pipe the sealing is effected, and thus protected the virus
will keep for months. The test for discarding tubes thus prepared is a
microscopical ove, and consists in the detection of bacteria or evidences
of putrefaction in the liquid.
Fourth. The inoculation of cattle is most safely practiced on the tip
of the tail. All parts that are loose, and from which any extensive
exudation may spread over the connective tissue beneath the skin, must
be avoided. The lips, dewlap, and root of the tail have proved dangerous
localities. When the operation is properly and delicately performed,
the tip of the ear is said to be safe, but on the whole the end of the tail
is after long experience found to be the best.
Dairymen have frequently resorted to the plan of making an incision
THE LUNG PLAGUE. i i |
of an inch or two in length, inserting in the part a piece of lung, and
bandaging; swelling, inflammation, sloughing of the tail, secondary
deposits in the lymphatic glands and other parts of the organs, have
frequently resulted from this rude practice.
Dr. Willems first described his mode of inoculation as follows: “TI
take the liquid pressed from an animal recently slaughtered, or of one
that has died of the disease; I plunge into it a kind of large lancet;
then I make two or three punctures at the lower extremity of the tail of
the animal that I wish to preserve from the disease; a singie drop of the
liquid is sufficient to make the inoculation.”
At one time Dr. Willems adopted the plan of making two punctures,
one on the upper part and the other on the lower surface of the tip of the
tail, and both about the same distance from the extreme end of the
organ. He found that this frequently led to afusion of the exudation
commencing around each puncture, and the result was the sloughing of
the tail. He therefore resorted to the punctures disposed vertically in a
line with the tail and about three inches from each other. By this
means the exudations commencing at the two spots had no tendency to
coalesce and lead to untoward results.
Various instruments have been suggested for the operation. Dr.
Sticker devised a hollow stilet with a sharp diamond-shaped point.
The stilet is armed with a little india-rubber tube, and this passed into
a wooden handle, with a spring, whereby the flexible tube could be
squeezed for the expulsion of air,and by placing the point of the instru-
ment in the prepared liquid, sufficient is sucked in for an inoculation.
J have used this instrument as follows:
The end of the tail being firmly held in the left hand, the point of the’
instrument is plunged with the right hand superficially into the skin of
the tip of the tail, and directed from before backwards, so that any
effort to withdraw the tail would only hasten the operation. I can testify
from practice to the simplicity and efficacy of Dr. Sticker’s instrument
as used by me. I have preferred the plan of operating to Dr. Sticker’s
method, which consists in charging his instrument, holding the tail
firmly, and then pushing the stilet about one inch forward into the tail,
and by a simultaneous pressure upon the key, and a slight winding
motion, the virus is deposited beneath the skin and in the substance of
the organ. Dr. Sticker proposed making a channel with the instru-
ment—a channel downwards from which exudation might flow; but this
is of no avail if septic matter is used, and untoward symptoms result.
The result of Dr. Sticker’s operation, according to. his description, 1s a
local swelling occurring about the eighth or ninth day, and which
increases the tail from three to four lines in diameter and extends over
a length of one and a half to two inches; incisions have not been neces-
sary after the operation, and the tails have not mortified. The inoculated
cattle do not lose their appetites and the flow of milk is not diminished.
Dr. Sticker considers it important that the virus should be deposited in the
connective tissue beneath the skin and not deep in the muscles of the tail.
2 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
But with the tubes proposed to preserve the liquid a very simple plan
consists in using a small bistoury or lancet, scarifying the upper surface
of the tail an inch or so from the end, and from this part the hair may
be clipped off with a pair of scissors; the scarification must be superficial -
and blood should not be drawn if possible; the tube is taken and both
ends broken off; a little rubber ball or tube is fixed onto one end, and
by pressing this a few drops of liquid are dropped in the scarification.
This is the safest method, as there is no doubt of the virus being applied
to an absorbent surface, and the method of collection affords a guar-
antee of its purity; the tubes are thus kept hermetically sealed till
needed, and from the way they are used there is no loss of material.
The results of successful inoculation are somewhat various; by some
methods the swelling is considerable, and many tails slough. It is not
a little remarkable that cows do not often fail to enjoy immunity from
the disease after sloughing of the organ; it might, @ priori, have been
supposed that the acute inflammation and gangrene would have pre-
vented the specific action of the virus on the system, and there is reason
to believe that occasionally this does occur, as I have seen more than
one case of pleuro-pneumonia in cows that had lost their tail after mocu-
lation.
But under favorable circumstances a slight heat and tumefaction
occur round the puncture, at a period varying from a week to even sixty
days. Commonly from the ninth to the fifteenth day the local erup-
tion is visible, and if at all marked is attended with a little fever; a
slight shiver, restlessness, and some loss of appetite, slightly checked
secretion of milk, and constipation, may be néticed. I have repeat-
edly inoculated all the cows in a dairy, and the owner has not sustained
the slightest loss or inconvenience fromcows going off their milk ; indeed
this is the rule. :
No pustule, no suppuration, forms; untoward results consist in the
excessive local swelling, or, if putrid matter has been used, in secondary
deposits at the root of the tail, around the anus and other parts. One
of the most remarkable cases I ever witnessed was one in which, on the
seventeenth day after a carefully performed inoculation, both fore legs
and brisket swelled up enormously, and the animal suffered intensely
from fever and died on the fourth day.
As arule, no after-treatment is necessary, inasmuch as the results are
so slight that they even escape observation altogether. But when
excessive swellings occur it is best to use cold applications, and nothing
is better than a steady stream of cold water on the part at short inter-
vals. Incisions are not always desirable, but where it is deemed advisa-
ble to relieve great tension, they must be deep and free; the resulting
wound must be washed with a solution of sesquichloride of iron or
chloride of zinc, of the strength of four grains to the ounce of water.
When the animal has much fever and is costive, a saline purge, such as
a pound of Epsom salts, affords relief.
THE LUNG PLAGUE. 13 «
APPENDIX No. 1.
Statement of losses by lung plague in cattle in the District of Columbia
and vicinity, collected for Professor Gamgee, by Mr. G. Reid, Ingleside
Farm, Washington, D. C.
8
os
i 9.4 | © S
Number. 2 dies alee a
eth EG * ie ies
é | é¢ 3 $
A A A Zi
RS ee ao eee ee ae re ee) 5 1 2 ae
emt eo TAT oii PUR ay UMN UE 5 Bt: bets 2
meee eM LT IPL See AY iin el dace 30 lat s Bl ae
Bummer) 2c uer toed 9s leeds AF Se ety: 18 {) | Saeed (eee
“ade Pee ne nr Mae wr oa ae 30 | nee 2
En os Fo 2 S28 ba ithe lh ee od 30 Tie 1
Fong be seRRSE ERE RE EERE ar ee ese ees 22 A ast nae ee
See joc do bees Sh di aleealeite cheatin ee 40 7a i ee
Lys puedeee ee capl Geet al «celle naa as Sie a Ut iL ps AR SA aE el a
Ree ere ee RL) UNITS OWN TUT ALE 1S. Eee brea). "Cae
ieee itr. Nobusi ite bs faible fais AGU. Abe: es cere
esate peti ood be oath eV ane OMe A Uys or arom! 12 |b Felpclll Ssehas
Mt OM 2 he EA sd od tate ogee tee: 22 17 Bul eta
8 Spe a td ei ee OP ows a Bale cine
TE, o_o oe a ee err 12 10 2 2
"Ea ce et el ane RE. Se GL ine eles ea a 16 Chalesedomaallae eben
ia. age Boia Bi pe eas a ae gues en eee Se Bi | re ae A A, SO
Shee el pat a AE ete I RMR ie GAS EE eg al aie [a
Rpmmme cee S51. Enshun 1h cesnoyh aeaisl ve db da ahs ee sys EL ae Bile JAsab Selle so.
ech! tig eas ne eee me eR 5 4 AB ca
SO Ra fe Fob rch ects ea TE Reet ae SM
SO... 2 2) Say Se ieee eon eee 25 C1 ann aie
PES cote once CL a III ec ae ia BOS eas eae 3
SEE a adie viata Sioa oS ais Sioa 3d SSE Se Saat ee 35 25 ee Aa ee
Sf te. Se re ed 14 6 6) ae
feces ay. ML) A eee ead Bs Tater 1 10) Renal SEM es
Tip eee a 471 198 | 39 16
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
14
“Suny
OUIBS aq} PUB AUO WOT
IO}VUL RIM poyepnoouy
‘SyIvVUID yy
“MOTB[NIOUL Fo
-je paivoddy via
-ounoaud-o.med
orga 3B polled
poioedde syoaye
ay} YO 4B poldlag
“G4LVTNOONI ATLLVYO 40 GNIM
eee eee ee eee ee ee ee a “kVp Y40% tt T See as ae as a it T 6% oune stercsrse*- ¥90TGISOM ‘Keeyog fc
9t |st Ame | Tt “ep peg | APP | IL | AT] T Var aa oe eae (ae OL | OL | 6 eung |--------xa0IqjseA\ ‘U100q UBA “¢
ee ee ee “£ep WIS I it ee wceel| eee sleoeeses ee ee ee es T I 8 Aine see eee i es od
(Sat ae ale Ca “Aep uipe | Aep wig |b 1G Pica Ui a oe € |e is gg ung |"-"""°""""" UeynoH ‘ussay uBA “AT
63 | se Aine us. ; 7 LP pee Bi ae Beis ca a ;
tz | ee simp 6) @ Avp 1493 | T iy I I 9 co oune yen ‘dwmod “£
& | Lt ‘sny ‘
Gane ames So | =7--/-Avp UALS | F Sioa rales i (et Sa p SIL |p tefes Ghwbafie P "77 -qyoaq7() oo1deq “MA
1¢ | ST “sny)
Glas |e fing $ g ‘Aep wee | ABpuip | es | ee [7-777 8 |¢ ae ia “| ST | 08 | gg oung |°---* ~~“ ueAoquN YoY ‘uous Ay “¢
Il |9 Arne |
yoaste Series eee aa aaceeses a5 Ae piTagen| lan GA Aaa sets | Rca em aioe eee De I (CUA lapel eee cp ec os gp mee ee AGE
BE Stace ae | (ie | (aaa a, “vp ype | T Gis ep kegel ae = ee eeepc Nae | PT G CB OU Fy ae tae ap eee OCT,
e&% |9 Ame | T “Avpyycp |--Aep mig | 08 | of | & i ae (ea WW 4 e || oi 16 | pL oung |** WaAoqueN WY ‘stoyvus0yog “|
Loni —_ _ Leoni —
= See | ace Oe lor oies | ors leBelboeet | nme laa 5
=} % ® ® Re oe o | R° ao] R* 6 Fa : 3 a
S = 5 g ey | Gr ee teal) eile |e Bs | ite. er lfc 3
g @ Ee es a eae PE (Safed || DEN i ere, ee POSE NNW ty ore hs re ||| 2) =
s Scot |b la sels Sie ee ee ec |
a oye. co 2 st 3 0 % © raf ae) A ® at
& B 6 E . I o = 2 | on 8
# 5S z 3 pat o's Pa oe 3
® gs g 5 5 4 5 4 3 z 5 4 Ey *s10qortdord
E & @ 5 oes ae Fy S fy Jer 3 aq} JO opoge jo soov[d puv sours
i 4 . 2, . S . S, ic) . ic} .
=o 1 5 a ia
o BS
: Sate y 3, Ald
= MILLS, AT
TO1B]NIOUT 494 = 3 ‘monE[noout 4a1ye [BIO , "soATRO HaOs10H son amon ‘SM.09 YOTUN 2
fo}
gy
6B
g
aouenbastod UI palp yey} syeUlTae Jo ‘ON
*‘pauiDjgo sqnsa ay7 puw pauLofuad suorunpnoour ayy fo hanumungy
“VINOWOUNd-OUNAITd DALLVGOXA
‘SHIMAG LSU
‘SLNOWIYVAdXo HOLNAG AO DIAVi
G ON XICGNGddV
15
INOCULATION.
EXPERIMENTS IN
‘ShT SI UUIN[OO OY} UI SaanSy oy} JO yonpord jwor oy} ynq ‘s}MoTINIOp [BUIIIO OY} TOIT 41 sonpordadt OM !4D9TTOOUI ST [B}0} ST
G T PT Tf PT TTL +
———S|SJ
OL
“palp ‘peyeynoour sveaM |
yorya paw ‘Aine jouyg | ....
wojj eIuomnaud-oines|d
ya peyeye Moo VW
“perp eto yorqas
jo ‘payeynoour 910M
gMoo o1tmowneud omy,
“pop ‘poye[noourl SBM
yey} ‘moo otuotmnoeud W
“BUN, oles ay} UlodF
10}}6W YIM poyepnoouy
03 |e Amr)
6 Ir Aine S
€ i sing J
L L Ae
¢ oe Aine
T |eeesreee ae
J
@r | er Aime
91
-ABp 818
ABP UIPG
-- £Bp pE
Avp WIST
-Avp WOL
Avp W91
--ABp 6
“ep WOT
“ABP WIFS
“ABP 816
GE
9T
LT
ite)
LPG
+}——
66
reat
9T
cc | IG GE | € 9) | S6 PST x
ey] a ES ee il boa 9 (2 PL
¢ |G ciel ie aay FSI Ge ain to Wg
Sea lies <> ellie lee allt 1
sel 9 a ee Oo ee eens
Cohan | Sar a Nia Ty GL
AE TAA | esses ieee ESE ST
pees Secuacioocs seeeee| eel yp aI
1 yas Pelle mee Loe ay OT
QR
nes
=
lar)
oun
og eunr
he aed en es TORO R
tereeeros* HIIOTIBY ‘OVIByT UeA
soee---yKpsuopeRyy ‘Ula}suessO A.
pastels s---""* puvpaelA ‘a100pase yy
‘so 7*"--puppaor, ‘B1aquepnoM “1
‘roses -puBpoorA ‘d1oquepno AA “WT
“4IjDaAPSOO'T-MNAIN “YL9H JO0. "W
--qydaIpSoOTT-MNOIN ‘saa “PIAL
“{YPoIpSOO'T-MNIIN ‘Yay Jaag “VW
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
76
“euaT}
e10joq yee B padyBo
A[quqoid ‘ep ysnsny pod
[rey ey} Jo diy oy} Jo S80]
*SYIVUO A,
(‘pReyeioy 10
eure BOIS Tr is ONES ORs weti-s sess aTqurepIsmoy |OT “Snyip “Snyjg “dny)---*--- G ofr r rote Opes ss") 1Bq8) ‘ep pue HOV | OT
Sa are Se ia allel =o iia cle aaa a acini cee, | eine. Se eral ain ele Me LUV AP meae iN ee a ccenal ine ataah || Gof oo SOD a5 25 |e aca eB eH MUSTANG
(‘e0RF
Fie OSE ee OOHRS oral PisieYe IO COBE ORG Boe SOSS SO SCREW HOIh Cali Hebi SSSSRSE Sy Ayqii(e| “7g” |SCOSOooeSe OD gases 971A) ‘aJIY A puw youl |g
saiainiele/sie!|\sleleisieeliz ---| [ |0% ydeg|--9°*-*"[---ee"" "|" ~oyeiepoyy [OL “Any|p “BnY|-"--"--"|G “sny| B POSTEO IIIS IE OS MTP ONS AI (St |I)L
(‘o0R5
BOEG Oo BESOCS PROS Ty Wie 6 ysIOIOCR asia SOSSOO NOC AGL tey Galeidia Ebehs|bfen Gt) NFS ROOSS | s(t fOCOOISCCrG op***77*| oq1pas) ‘ozITT AA pue poy \9
» p ‘AON (Ceorz |
Pesecenae (acacia corel aT, cleilie AOR |s -"| epas) ‘oq pus yoRIE | F
(‘90Ry
piaias aloirie's\|iSiciele/siel| sini T (9 “SoO|*°-"-"-"|-es9"=--lo> = oyeaepomp |TT “any|p “SsMy|"--<""="|pe oun) p . |------=-- op--=s=7) eqas) “op1qA pus ung@ |/¢
(‘a0vy
eet Namal || 2 shes | Th PEPPER aayoy Po Roos Sa |FOSO SCOR ORC NEO) |e) Sela tg Mbiny|PSS SOS Elsi gy GNelETS|| fe) ISS Gi SeSs ODF es OPA) ‘OITA PUB ov |Z
‘jlozuedaayog
PO EROOGYIGOACO sO! op ite daa y|PooIoIoor veeseee-|--- oipiopom 9 “snyig ‘“snyi----"---|@ Aine] F pne S1aquepnoAA |-*-77* eee pRey oT AA | T
*8.L09A
= - = = | Ff
ee e|82\2 [2 Pen ee cece E
=] im ars oO + o> o> o> oO a)
oe Si ea) Bee 5 ® ® ® ® § | 8
BE Rilo B,| o jog o &. @ ° ° ° ior
8 2le0'| 2 lsS/ owed |spopg) ea Be mS a Ea rn “jeu x
BB ol/oSs| Ses cf oe 5 B, 8 TE CRONIN eq} jo uondiioseq
pew/e2]/o | B 9 ad 2 4 3
Sede aa " Sites E z
Bere he: eal es = er 8 &
co) 6/5 3 *£19A0003 “MOT E[NIOUTAY =e a 5 :
(‘paqnpnaour 979,09 pousoy) ‘Jooyag Rivur4aja4 93D]5 2Y] 1D apyvUu UoYyvno0uUr Jo spuaunsadxa ayy fo ispmung
*"VINOWMANd-OUNATd AAILVGNXa
‘SaINag GNOOUG
“SINGAWIYEdXoH HOLOG AO ATA ViL
°C ‘ON XIGNUddV
C7
IN INOCULATION.
EXPERIMENTS
'
‘er Aine pera
“rey
oy} JO ofoyA oy} ATIBON
“eg oun pord
*[f8} OY} JO OfOTAA OGL
“6 snsny ped
“[te} 9} JO pus OL
“po ATUL para
“Tle} oy} FO puo oaL
“Asnorasad
siuownoud-o1neld pep
ile Ayn al [aa
=< eecee- T «<--
se cecees| senna it
So B95000 7 --e-
oe wewees|snnnn- T
Be Sona 5)] 7 see
== weeee- AERO 3
or 4c)
GG
GG
“"eUON |FT "30
“*OUON |FT "300
“-9UON |FT "0
“"9UON |FT "20
“@UON FT “PO
“"euON IFT “}90
SOO ESSEP TT CONN
FESS ED)
prone [UPL
po Sin stead)
mn 2
ere’ Seer. © yay)
Ses reed
TIS SOS SEER EG)
ree suoN
e[qeiopisuog
pe “-- su0ON
Troe USTs
SSCS aT pA eS}
“FUSS
g oune
g oung
gt Ame
oo Ame
or Ame
g Ane
co 9une
OL “Sny
OL “sny
‘(OL ‘sny
(OL ‘Sny
SG
GB
G
oun
oune
oun
eune
Sine
eune
oun
sun
Ane
Aine
Aine
‘sny
‘Sny
‘any
‘Sny
‘any
PL “AON
€ “Ie
cr Ame
¢ Ame
0g ‘ony
16 “Sny
eee wcens
LT “qa
6L “Ady
FL ‘00d
L ony
I 4jne
1@ Alor
“yqoon
19 38 «‘joo1saq
tereereee sop:
48009
pause Sinquejnoyg
“maAOUal}yoVW
P qe ‘mouckM ‘fC
“youre yy
8 ‘leyH UBA 'X)
*yOO.1qase MA
a ‘100q urA ‘ff
MOAOTUATIqOW
9 1 af
“MOAOYUST}YOV 4B
ip ‘S1oyBuleOTOg “q
‘moud AA
(‘90R 3
ayy) ‘oy poyodg
(peoq
OU As) ‘OPTI AA PUB YORTT
sreeeeces otttas payodg
Pea OPM pus sovlea
Cpeeyoiof u0
1v48) ‘o}ITA pue yore
">" (pRey ayy) “ovyg
"rrrrtoss agra poyjodg
: (peey
O}IA) ‘OJIYAA paw yovlq_
SROHEOE OYA pues yorrg
(3189
gyem) ‘ayy peyodg
ee aa ei + oem LLG:
(1m eaey
OPA) ‘OPT puB yoRTg
((90Ry
oy) ‘oUGA pus ung
(‘aaBy
OTA) ‘ay pezjodg
OyTYA PUB HBL
a se ~~, — “a
96
GG
ix
£6
91
cT
PL
€L
6L
mai
ON THE ILL EFFECTS OF SMUTTY CORN ON CATTLE,
BY JOHN GAMGEE, M. D.
A CAUSE OF DRY MURRAIN.
The opportunity presented itself, last fall, for an inquiry as to the
manner in which smuts which attack plants may affect animals. The
close of 1868 was, throughout America, very wet; a large amount of
corn became smutty, that is to say, was attacked to a serious extent by
ustilago maidis, and reports reached me from the west and south that
cattle were dying in large numbers from a mysterious malady, the origin
of which was unknown. From Mills County, Iowa, I was informed, late
in November, that about the 12th of the month there was a fall of snow
six inches deep, and the cattle, which usually roam at large on the
prairies, were taken in by all the better farmers who had their corn
gathered, and turned into the stalk fields. In about eight days the
eattle began to die, and all presenting the same symptoms. My inform-
ant, Mr. James Hull, of Plattsmouth, Nebraska, lost four out of nine-
teen head, in fourteen days. This gentleman, alarmed at the number of
deaths, turned his cattle out of the stalk field and gave them all the
salt they would eat, mixed with copperas and sulphur. As soon as the
bowels were moved the symptoms disappeared. Mr. Hull also gave the
cattle asafcetida by ‘ driving it into the cob of the corn.”
Personal inquiries among gentlemen from different parts of the United
States, in Washington, enabled me to trace the malady to Western Vir-
ginia, Illinois, and the Carolinas. It is much to be regretted that
accurate information as to the extent of losses, and the localities
affected, cannot be secured.
There are other circumstances under which cattle die from eating
corn. The stalks, very late in the season, are apt to get very hard and
indigestible, and without a free admixture of grass, which the early
frosts kill, and the other food, they produce severe indigestion and
death. This is an observation that has freely been made in America,
Moreover, cattle die sometimes if freely-fed on corn that has been badly
stored, and is musty. The same results follow the use of other deteri-
orated foods, and a brief reference to records on this subject may be
found interesting and instructive.
The facts published with regard to the prevalence of a malady from
eating smutty corn, among cattle in America, are very few. If, how-
ever, the real cause of many cases of so-called dry murrain had
ILL EFFECTS OF SMUTTY CORN ON CATTLE. T
been recorded correctly, there would be no difficulty in demonstrating
that the condition of the cornfields has had much to do in developing
this disorder.
The Department of Agriculture has received information of the death
of cattle from eating smut corn, in Hampshire County, Massachu-
setts. Also from Whitley County, Indiana, where seven head of cattle,
out of fifty, died, “‘ probably from smut in the corn field in which the
herd ranged.”
From Story County, Iowa, it is reported that last “‘ November a dis-
ease appeared among herds recently turned into corn-stalk fields. The
disease is evidently the dry murrain. = ro ror md D> = ee ||
Lbs.| Lbs. Lbs Lbs. | Lbs.| Lbs. | Lbs. | Lbs. | Lbs.| Lbs. Lbs. Lbs. |Lbs.| Lbs.| Lbs.
T’l weight
of spleens.| 3753) 1, 4414! 1,9634) 5773] 241/1, 0342/1, 1093) 694 701| 3, 7804/1, 853. 25)1, 8793 183$ 3019) 530
Average..| 1.46] 1.423) 1.467] 1. 60/1. 585) 2.345) 2. 259) 2. 377)2. 675 1.45 1. 942) 2. 5381/1. 38/2. 36/2. 83
T’l weight
of livers. -|2, 92912, 3614/16, 6794| 3, 731/1, 611)4, 7023) 6, 070 360 |3, 139) 31, 9704) 10, 044%) 9, 969)
Average..|11. 39) 12.214) 12. 466/10. 335) 10. 6) 10. 66) 12. 36/12. 413/11. 98) 12.263) 10. 529/12. 236
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. 103
The examination, after death, of cattle in Illinois, Indiana, Missouri,
and Kansas, indicates that the usual post-mortem appearances, in well-
marked cases of splenic fever, are as follows:
The skin, very often infested with ticks, is occasionally seen studded
with dried drops of blood, as if the animal had sweated blood in dying.
Then small blood clots have been found freely distributed over the neck,
trunk, and limbs, and especially between the thighs.
On removing the skin, blood-extravasations, or serous infiltrations,
are sometimes found beneath the lower jaw and brisket. The subcuta-
neous areolar tissue, as a rule, is pallid and not congested, as in anthrax.
The muscular system is normal, and I have not been able to distin-
guish any deviation from the common appearance of slaughtered cattle,
if the animals are examined immediately after death.
The organs of respiration are, in many instances, healthy. The res-
piratory passages are always so. The lungs, sometimes the’seat of cada-
veric congestion, on the side on which the dead body has been lying
are occasionally ecchymosed, and the pleura is of a dark purplish color,
over distinct lobules which are found intensely congested, but never
hepatized throughout their substance. It has not occurred to me to find
a Single portion of lung tissue which would not float on water.
In nearly half the cases the collapse of the lungs, when the chest is
opened, is imperfect; and according to the extent of interference with
this collapse do we find interlobular emphysema. The areolar tissue
between the lobules is blown up with air; and on the outer aspect of
the lung, especially on the arteries and middle lobes, a beaded and
streaked appearance, owing to the distension of the connective structure,
is striking and well marked. The pleure are rarely found changed;
but occasionally, scattered over the mediastinal reflections or on the
diaphragm, are well-marked ecchymoses.
The pericardium is unusually empty, but I have found it considerably
distended with bloody serum. The surface of the heart is almost inva-
riably blood-stained to a greater or less extent. The most common seat
of these ecchymoses is on the apex, or the auricular appendages. In
the right side a small blood clot is very commonly found in animals that
have been lying dead for several hours, and the left side is found
empty. Both ventricles, and sometimes even the auricles, may be found
entirely eechymosed; but, as a rule, the extravasations are most marked
and extensive in the left ventricle, and especially on the fleshy pillars.
DIGESTIVE ORGANS.
The mouth, pharynx, and cwsophagus. are always healthy. The
rumen is usually full of food, and its coats healthy. The mucous mem-
brane alone has been found congested in two cases.
The recticulum, or second stomach, containing semi-fluid material,
has been often found reddened ; but especially in cows which had swal-
lowed nails, wires, needles, and other foreign objects, that are so com-
104 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
monly found in the second stomach of cattle. In two cases wires had
perforated the recticulum and diaphragm, and in one the pericardium
was adherent to the diaphragm, and injured.
The omasum, or third stomach, is almost invariably in a normal con-
dition; and whereas there are some instances in which it is consider-
ably distended, and the food packed dry between the folds, there is
no appreciable difference between the condition in which we have found
it in our numerous dissections, and the state we should expect to find it
in a similar number of healthy cattle.
The abomasum, or fourth stomach, is almost invariably the seat of
distinct and specific changes. On opening it, throughout its whole length
itis found varying from a pink to adeep blood-red color over its cardiac
end. The pyloric end is more commonly of a natural color. But
although there is this marked difference in the general aspect of the
two sections of the abomasum, both present further and very character-
istic morbid appearances. In the cardiac end, three different forms of
lesion are seen, in different cases. In some the folds, and even the mem-
brane between the folds, are studded irregularly with minute petechiz
of a dark, blood-red color. Each petechia is like a flea-bite, though
somewhat smaller, and darker in color. Its center is dark, and some-
times softened or perforated. The areola around this center is well
defined and regular, offering a marked contrast to the surrounding mem-
brane, which, though usually congested and reddened, is not of the same
depth of color as the petechial spot. In other cases the reddened folds
are studded with minute yellowish-gray granulations, due to a change
in the epithelium, which becomes swollen, and has a tendency to drop
off. Each granulation does not usually exceed the size of a pin’s head.
This appearance is most marked where the folds are most congested;
and in some cases, where the congestion is slight, itrequires a somewhat
careful inspection to recognize the presence of this change. Scattered
throughout the folds, especially near their free edges, we find the
third change, which consists in marked erosions, as if the epithelium
had been peeled off with a sharp finger nail.
The margins of the erosion are well defined, and of the color of the
surrounding membrane, or they are often paler. The center of each ero-
sion is of a blood-red or brownish color.
It is very rare to find the pyloric end, however natural its general
aspect, without some well-defined patch, off which the epithelium is strip-
ped and a dark, granular surface left, to which the green food adheres
more or less firinly. On the pyloric gland this erosion, as frequently
observed, is of a zigzag form, and tolerably deep fissures into the mem-
brane give to the gland a shrivelled and wrinkled appearance.
Ihave seen nearly the whole of the mucous surface in the pyloric
antrum eroded ; but more commonly there are three, four, or more iso-
lated patches, varying from half aninch to eventwo inches in diameter.
The duodenum is often of a deep red color. Sometimes its mucous
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. 105
membrane is deeply tinged with bile. At others it is the seat of scat-
tered ecchymoses, less numerous and regular than those on the folds of
the abomasum.
The jejunum and ileum may be reddened throughout on their mucous
surface. Sometimes the redness is in patches. It is punctiform; and,
in parts, ecchymoses heighten the general color. In one case I found one
of Peyer’s glands somewhat tumefied, but free from any deposit around,
and simply turgid and congested. The cecum is often extensively ecchy-
mosed, especially on the free margin of the effaceable mucous folds, so
that, when the membrane is stretched, it has a striped appearance. The
stripes may be of a bright or rusty-red color, but are often blackened, as
we so commonly find, with blood extravasions in the large intestine of
eattle. The ileo-colic fold is usually ecchymosed, tumefied, or of a black-
ish color. Scattered petechiz are not uncommon, and the fundus of the
czeeum may be found the seat of marked, ramified redness. The general
appearance of the mucous lining of the colon is often the same. In the
rectum the folds are commonly ecchymosed, and we have found free but
delicate clots adherent to the membrane. The blackened appearance of
the interstitial extravasations is nearly as common in the rectum as in the
cecum.
The liver, so often the seat of chronic lesion in cattle, such as thicken-
ing and induration of the capsule in spots, is often the seat of fatty de-
generations, and is found congested and heavy in some cases ; whereas
the reverse holds good in others. Reference to the weights of the livers
will show that there is no relation between any distinct state of the organ,
as ascertained by the sealer, and the existence of splenic fever.
The gall bladder is usually distended with viscid bile, and its lining
membrane is at times the seat of ramified redness. The coats of the gall
bladder have been found, in several cases, much thickened by intersti-
tial, serous infiltration, which, from being retained in the areolwe of the
connective tissue, had the appearance of a gelatinous mass.
The spleen is uniformly enlarged, as indicated by the many observa-
tions noted in the tables published in the appendix. The weight varies
from two to ten pounds. It rarely exceeds six or seven. One of the
largest Texan spleens, weighing eight pounds, and found by one of Dr.
Rauch’s inspectorsin a slaughtered animal, measured twenty-seven inches
in length, seven and one-half inches in width, and three inches in thick-
ness at its thickest point.
The spleen is of a purplish color, its peritoneal surface sometimes
ecchymosed; and, on making an incision into its capsule, the pulp oozes
out. A section shows the complete effusement of the usual granular
look, due to the very marked Malpighian bodies, so well seen in the ox’s
spleen. The scraping with a knife readily forces out the currant-jelly-
like pulp, and leaves the trabecul free and clear. In thirty well-marked
diseased spleens, Dr. Mannheimes found only two in which the trabe-_
cul were firm and sound. They were destroyed and completely unrecog-
nizable from any other part of the tissues of the organ.
106 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
URINARY ORGANS.
The kidneys may be perfectly healthy, but are most commonly of a
dark brownish-red color, from intense congestion. The pelvis of each may
be normal; but, in the earliest stages, I have found linear interstitial
blood deposits in the mucous membrane. At first these are of a bright
arterial hue, but they become more extensive and dark in color as the
disease advances. Whenever there is bloody urine in the bladder, the
pelvis of each kidney contains some of the same. In one case I found
one of the lobes of the right kidney fluctuating on pressure, and, when
opened, it was found to contain a cyst, distended by a couple of ounces
of dark, bloody urine. In the majority of cases the urinary bladder is
found very much distended with blood-colored urine. Its mucous sur-
face may be normal and pallid, but is sometimes congested; and, in
several cases, I have found it studded with very minute ecchymoses,
which have existed either in the fundus or at the cervix, or have been
thickly disseminated over the whole of the internal lining. The organs
of generation are found healthy, and cows with calf have always re-
tained the foetus, whether it was a few days or several weeks old. In
one case I found the peritoneal surface of the womb studded with ecchy-
moses precisely similar to those seen on the internal surface of the blad-
der, and in another, the broad ligaments of the uterus had a marked
appearance of the same description.
NERVOUS SYSTEM.
In all the cases in which partial paralysis of the hind quarters alone
was marked, we found the upper cornua of the gray matter in the lum-
bar region reddened; and the microscopical examination showed blood-
extravasations and staining of the nerve cells. This appearance could
be traced in all parts of the cord, in cases of more general paralysis; and,
in one instance in which it was most general and marked, there was
blood-extravasation outside the dura mater, beneath the medulla oblong-
ata. Thé gray matter of the medulla was itself slightly blood-stained.
On opening the cranium, in one instance, we found the inner surface of
the dura mater studded with bright red spots, similar to the small ecchy-
moses seen in the urinary bladder; and the spots were distributed over
the whole of the cranial surface. The pia mater is often congested, and
the gray matter of the cerebrum and the cerebellum often reddened. The
puncta vasculosa, in the oval centers, are very marked; and the lateral
ventricles, in one case, contained a little reddish-colored serum. Beyond
this tendency to congestion and occasional blood-extravasation, no lesion
was discovered in the nervous system; and both white and gray matter
was usually firm and not softened.
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. 107
CAUSES AND NATURE OF THE DISEASE.
In those parts where the splenic or periodic fever of cattle is enzootic,
the prevailing influences are such as favor the development of intermit-
tent disease in man. There are parts more healthy than others; and
the beneficial effects of constant winds, a dry soil, adequate elevation,
and the introduction of good systems of culture, tend to make many
regions in the vast countries over which malarious conditions prevail
favorable for the health and prosperity of man. In the most swampy
parts those diseases annually recur with the intense heat of summer
which are known to characterize low and unhealthy lands in all parts of
the world, and these often persist even in the winter season. The bilious
remittent and intermittent fevers in man are represented in animals by
the deadly charbon or anthrax, the black tongue of domestic and wild
ruminants, as also by a marked form of the splenic fever which I am
describing.
Texas and Florida have been chosen as resorts for invalids—for con-
sumptive people during the winter. They are considered so healthy
countries, that to cast a doubt over the salubrity of Texas might lead
any one into difficulties in that State. It is not too much to say of the
State that its acclimatized inhabitants prefer to live there rather than
choose what might be viewed as a healthier climate further north. But
it is impossible for an unprejudiced stranger traveling through the State
not to observe the usual spare habit of body, the sallow, yellowish com-
plexion, and the want of activity that prevail among the inhabitants.
There are exceptions and exceptional spots; but any one traveling from
Maine to Texas can satisfy himself that some condition, whether of soil
or climate, is unfavorable to the health of man.
ILhad not anticipated witnessing the universal indication of a low
standard of health in animals. Texans pride themselves on their herds
of beeves, on the size cattle often attain, on the masses of fat rolling
over the bones and muscles of steers fed only on mesquite, and they
look on Texas as a center whence the world may be supplied with beeves.
There is every reason for believing that Texas must remain one of the
greatest, if not the greatest, cattle-growing State of the Union. But its
progress and prosperity demand that farmers should be informed of the
conditions which are ever in operation against them, and they will
doubtless bring their intelligence and industry to bear in correcting evils
that are far from imaginary.
Inquiries as to the diseases of Texan cattle in Texas are almost always
met by people of that State by the declaration that cattle are never sick
there ;—yet a ‘norther” may sweep down and drive the cattle onto a
narrow neck of land, where they have to starve at times for want of
food; drought, as in 1864, sometimes destroys thousands; while in the
winter excessive wet destroys the grasses, favors diarrhea, and unless
the cattle can get in the woods and eat some swamp moss, wild
108 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
onions, or other products of the river bottoms they must occasionally
succumb.
The close of 1868 and beginning of 1869 have been remarkable for an
excessive amount of rain. Cattle have suffered largely, and on all
the sedge grass lands along the Brazos starvation has been uncommon.
Further west, on the mesquite, not far from Corpus Christi, &c., cattle
have been in fair condition; but some idea of the scarcity of really fat
cattle during the winter months may-be obtained from the fact that, at
Indianola, cattle for New Orleans market could not be had under twenty
dollars in gold. We hear so much of cattle being worth only a few dol-
lars a head in summer, and people killing them by the thousand for
their hides and tallow, that the only reason to be given for heavy win-
ter prices is the scarcity of really fat stock, and the great distance it
has to be driven, even to such a port as Indianola.
I have seen many large herds of Texan cattle that had been wintered
in Illinois, Indiana, or Missouri, and have made myself acquainted with
the average run of weights of cattle in Texas, and one most important
fact appears, viz., that a Texan steer will increase in twelve months, on
the grasses of a more northern latitude than those of his native State,
by one, two, and three hundred pounds over and above the highest
weight he will ever attain in Texas. Let us take the cattle fed on the
mesquite, said to be fat all the year round—and where, therefore, an
animal has not to make up for lost condition—and age for age, it will
take three of them to weigh down the Illinois steer, and probably tour.
I take the best and the average, and it will be found, on careful exami-
nation, that the cattle on the noted grasses of Texas, whether from the
soil, heat, water, or other cause, do not attain the weight and condition
that the same cattle do if removed to the north, nor that northern or
western cattle do on their own native prairies.
Texans are finding this out; and, much to their credit, they are intro-
ducing a system of corn-feeding that gives them cattle that can compete
in western markets with other corn-fed cattle. They can, it is true, show
us some prodigies off mesquite grounds, but the average run of grass-
fed cattle in Texas might be improved enormously by attention to the
subjects of breeding, shelter, artificial feeding, -We.
What are the active causes in operation, which tend to influence pre-
judicially the stamina of southern herds? Traveling over the prairies,
no one ean fail to be struck by the large number of dead animals to be
met with. The dissection of these, or the slaughter and dissection of
the first animal met with, reveals three distinct and unfavorable mani-
festations. The spleen is enlarged; the animals have, without exception,
the “ague cake”—the stamp of a malarious district; the liver is fatty,
and this is a lesion that might be anticipated in so warm a country ; the
true stomach is reddened at its left end, the membrane is eroded, or ap-
pears scratched with a sharp nail on its folds, and although there may be
only a single and small erosion, nevertheless the trace of gastric disor-
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. 109
der is there. I have not failed in a single instance in Texas to trace
this, and I have opened as many as twenty-six animals per day, weigh-
ing their organs carefully, and watching closely for these signs. Some-
times the scars of old ulcers are more marked than the erosions on the
mucous folds, and it is not uncommon to find there traces of ancient
lesions about the pylorus, or intestinal opening.
My observations extend further. From the earliest age that the calf
feeds on grass, to the oldest thatsa bullock attains, the morbid lesions
alluded to are found. They grow better and worse, and, in dissecting
a dozen animals, one or two will be found to have blood extravasations,
of a very limited and delicate character, in the pelvis of the kidney, in
the urinary bladder, and in the intestinal mucous membrane. During
the summer, so far as I can learn, more than at any other season, a few
bullocks in a herd may be seen to droop behind, and void bloody urine.
Mr. Louis Brandt, now a practicing veterinarian in New York, and who
lived twelve years in Texas, often witnessed these symptoms; and per-
sons engaged in shipping large quantities of cattle throughout the year,
have told me that they have at times seen the symptoms.
Itis difficult to get at the truth ; butfrom personal observation, and very
careful and numerous inquiries, I am in a position to state that almost
if not quite universally in the States bordering on the Gulf of Mexico,
and for a distance of at least two or three hundred miles inland, the
cattle do not attain the full weight they can and do reach elsewhere ;
that they very commonly appear in blooming health, and are usually free
from acute and marked symptoms of any disease; that, nevertheless,
these animals are usually more anemic and less firm than northern cat-
tle, and that, without exception, all of them that I have dissected have
shown the spleen enlarged to twice or thrice its usual weight, the liver
slightly or very fatty, and the true stomach reddened and eroded. The
removal of these animals to a northern State results, especially as winter
approaches, in a diminished size of spleen, a great deposit of fat and
development of blood and muscle, and the cicatrization of the gastric
lesions.
Side by side with observations made by.,me in Texas, on the bodies of
animals that had died, and on others slaughtered in apparent health,
must be placed Mr. Ravenel’s researches in relation to the cryptogamic
origin of the disease. I do not wish to forestall his observations, or the
report of Doctors Billings and Curtis, but certainly it appeared that the
grasses which the animals ate had a healthy aspect, were not infected by
parasitic plants, and could not, on a casual observation, be recognized
as presenting any peculiar character that might account for the ill health
of animals eating them.
Conjecture is not always profitable, and «s yet it is impossible to say
more with certainty than that, in a warm country, where a rich and re-
tentive soil is ever charged with considerable moisture, and where arti-
ficial systems of culture are in their infancy, a general low tone of sys-
110 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
tem prevails, which manifests itself in the shape of an imperfect devel-
opment of blood, an enlargement of blood glands, and very significant
lesions of the stomach and liver.
Descriptions of the Texan fever, which have been published for years
past, all agree that the Texan and also Florida cattle, which have caused
so much mischief, appear themselves to be in perfect health; and the
thriving condition of many herds in Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, and
Kansas tended, at first, to convince ‘us that whatever injured the im-
proved breeds indigenous to these States had no effect on the natives of
the country, the long-horned Texan cattle. It is true that at Cairo we
were informed, by a gentleman whose statement we had no reason to
doubt, that he had seen many Texan cattle die in the railway pens; and
as many as nine or tenin one morning had been found dead, having, in
his opinion, succumbed to the same disease as that destroying the cows
of the inhabitants of Cairo. He supplied the hay for all the cattle landed
there, and about the first lots, landed in April, appeared sound; but he
afterwards saw three or four lots, numbering from two hundred and fifty
to five hundred head, which were affected by the prevailing disease. He
distinctly avers that six, eight, and even ten head of dead cattle were
hauled off the boats when they arrived laden with stock, and the men
in charge got medicine for the disease. One lot of two hundred and
fifty animals, referred to by this informant, was taken off the cars at
Farina, after leaving Cairo for the north, simply because they were suf-
fering severely, and it was supposed that this arose from the journey ;
but they communicated disease to all the cattle that fed in their path,
and killed forty-seven out of fifty Illinois cattle with which they grazed,
from the 10th of May to the middle of June.
In opposition to hearsay evidence, it was my duty to examine cattle
alive and those which were dead. J saw sixty-four Texan steers, fresh
from New Orleans, which were unloaded at Cairo, on the Ist of August.
They all appeared healthy. We had previously seen a considerable quan-
tity of the same kind of stock without being able to detect the slightest
evidence of disease ; and were happy to receive an invitation to visit
Mr. Alexander’s farm, at Brondlands, near Homer, where there were four
thousand five hundred and twenty-seven Texan steers, which had been
driven to Brondlands, and had communicated disease not only to the cat-
tle feeding on their trail, but also to a herd of Illinois cattle, with which
they were mixed in reaching their destination.
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. iid
The numbers and dates relating to the several importations at Brondlands
are as follows :
Purchased at— Date of arrival at Brondlands. No.
HO ONO eet eee a oat och yak are, ae Manes sp SOG) 8 iets ce eas 2 499
OGG es ep oo CERO e nee eae eer JUNG pea Sb8s. een yee se 228
PRGLOM ON ee ee =a ante a a eile nines Sy roc sm: SIMS SOG tee sae eee ane 496
IRGLGMOMe eo eetecioe = soe ore pene tomo cee oe JUMer 20 ISGHSMILE on Leet ee nae 349
POG aes: nese Se Rack Pee Fak es Sumer Zo plSGS se j2- oe ches cites 537
Bor ENO Ss Se he oe ae tere See ee ene SUMNER O MUSHSUSS see aese Foe asses 140
MOON... S334 eee es sss 3% Junens0) L868 Sih eess-sis55 203 107
PA OUIIOS 35 act e sae oh ops bis slices ulliye ye 2 WB OS vans st Seer cect. See 248
PAID ONIN Oies Sa ors eta ayes a site sep een diwihyavias WUchiceee, ne nenn et Senses 241
CLIP ee caaee a AaatehOe Seer SEE aBemEee 00 alle Ue, Sic Se a aie Serene gs 195
MOlOHONsese's S37 ces Hels sake eee cles e ss July 22 SOS so. sees a leeetere aoe 362
PROLGHOM Sees jaetelec mene etme etc Juilly” 2b, 1BO8ir soe ce slates eet 611
PROlOnO ee dt Seee ee ees seek ek BPS ullye 2851 868 s2 ey: 4 2he Se soot se 514
| 4,527
Up to the 12th of September, the date of a letter from Brondlands,
thirty-one of the animals had died, “‘most if not all of them from inju-
ries received in transit.” Out of four thousand five hundred and twen-
ty-seven animals driven or transported in steamers and on railroads,
- considering the great distances these had to travel, it is not surprising that
some should die; and all which we examined alive appeared healthy
and thriving. That they communicated disease to a very serious extent
is proved beyond doubt; and it would have been important to deter-
mine, by the slaughter of many, their real condition.
On the 6th of August I visited Brondlands a second time, for the
purpose of dissecting a Texan steer which the people of the neighbor-
hood believed would show signs of the disease. We inspected the herds
generally, which still looked in perfect health, but one of the imported
cattle was reported ill and dying. He had reached the farm about the
middle of July. and had not thriven well. It was, as usual, supposed
that he had sustained injuries on the journey. When I saw this animal
alive, he was lying down, with his head stretched on the ground; imper-
ceptible pulse at the jaw, great listlessness and prostration, but pre-
senting no distinctive symptoms of splenic fever. After death 1 found
that there was an effusion of bloody serum under the jaw. The organs
of respiration were healthy, and the heart sound. The whole of the
stomach and the intestines were normal; as also the liver, gall bladder,
and spleen. The kidneys and bladder exhibited no signs of blood
extravasations, or alteration in the urine, such as is seen in splenic
fever. From the general emaciation of the body, and the absence of
any lesion of disease, it was evident to me that this animal had died of
Tt2 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
hectic; or, in other words, of the ill effects of prolonged starvation and
ill usage, which had permanently arrested the functions of assimilation.
The Texan cattle were intermixed in the pastures of Brondlands with
about six hundred native animals. All but two hundred and eighty of
these were soon sent to eastern markets, and those which remained with
them began to die on the 26th of July. They were then placed on green
corn; but they continued to sicken and succumb to the disease, until
one hundred and ninety-eight of all kinds, including an old yoke of
Texan steers which had been some time on the farm, had been buried.
At the time of my visit, the mortality was raging at its highest point,
and men were busy, from sunrise to sunset, skinning, digging graves,
and burying. Information afterwards received was that one hundred
and fifty of the cattle sent to New York died before they arrived there,
and the rest were sent to the rendering tanks.
Colonel Sullivan, of Twin Grove, Vermillion County, Ill, purchased
five hundred Texan steers at Cairo, on the 24th of May. They remained
healthy, but communicated disease to forty Illinois steers and twenty
heifers and cows. The disease appeared at Twin Grove on Tuesday,
the 28th of July. Of the Texan steers three have died as the result of
accident. The next group of southern cattle, which came under special
observation, was that of J. A. Harris, near Champaign. He had eighty-
five head of southern cattle, purchased last fall. There were with
them thirty-eight Illinois steers, and this herd of one hundred and
twenty-three had grazed together the entire season. On the 15th of
July they were placed on pasture over which a herd of Texans had*
been driven on the 15th of June. On the 3d of August the Illinois
began to die; and, in four days, twenty out of the thirty-eight were
buried. The eighty-five southern cattle remained in perfect health.
This special immunity of the cattle imported from the south indicated
that they had overcome the influences which operate, however mildly,
to the prejudice of their health in the south.
On the 15th of August we visited Hickory Grove, near Oxford, Indi-
ana, There were there one thousand animals, which had been imported
in the fall of 1867, and had caused no disease either in transit or on the
farm. On the Ist of June, 1868, two hundred and sixteen head were
purchased, which came from New Orleans and Memphis; and, on the
12th of July and the 8th of August, two separate droves of one thousand
head were taken on the farm from Tolono. The condition of the whole
of this stock was as perfect as any grazier could desire. Many of them
were quite fit for the butcher; and those purchased last were in a thriv-
ing condition. The last two droves communicated disease on their trail ;
but, being by themselves at Hickory Grove, had no opportunity of
inflicting any damage.
At Parish Grove, adjoining the last named farm, a herd of about five
hundred Texan cattle had just been imported from Tolono. It was said
that the cattle, on their way from Paxton to Hickory Grove, in July,
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. ae
referred to above, had crossed the prairie in which the Parish Grove,
Illinois, cattle, numbering five hundred, had grazed. Within seven or
eight days after the last herd of five hundred cattle had reached Parish
Grove from Tolono, the [linois cattle began to die. Fifteen car loads
of these had just been sent by rail to Chicago; and, of the remaining
number, few survived. I inspected four sick steers, and it was evident
that the malady would destroy nearly ail the Dllinois stock. On an
adjoining farm Mr. Edward Sumner had nearly one thousand head of
northern cattle, among which the disease had appeared.
On the 14th of August we visited Mr. Joseph Heath’s farm, near
Oxford, Indiana, and found there one thousand one hundred Texan cat-
tle which had been purchased at New Orleans and Tolono. These had
communicated disease over the road they had passed, and Mr. Heath’s
native stock, numbering seventy or eighty, were dying fast. We exam-
ined three alive, and dissected two, showing all the indications of splenie
fever.
On the next day, at Reynolds, we visited a herd of over two hundred
Texan steers, which had arrived on the 27th of May; and disease
appeared at Reynolds the beginning of June. One ear load of the ani-
mals was unloaded at Chalmers, and driven onto J. M. Bunnell’s pasture,
at Reynolds. They remained there only two days; but, five weeks after-
wards, the disease appeared, and killed the whole of Mr. Bunnell’s stock,
amounting to eighteen head or thereabout. The bulk of the Texan eat-
tle were sent to Kenton’s pasture, three miles from Reynolds, where they
were mixed with seventy-three head of native cattle. Of these, at the
time of our visit, from fifty-five to sixty had already died, and others
were sick. Cattle on the west side of the track at Reynolds were safe ;
but cattle east, between the station and Kenton’s pasture, had died.
It is worthy of special mention here that, for the first time, the trans-
portation of Texan cattle was established in 1868 from New Orleans, by
steamboats up the Mississippi to Cairo; and thence, viathe Nlinois Central
road, to the pastures of Ilinois and Indiana, having heretofore been sent,
since the war, from New Orleans up the Mississippi to Louisville, Ken-
tucky, with the same'results as at Cairo. The first lot of Texan cattle
was landed at Cairo on the 23d day of April; and between that time
and the Ist of August, when the railway peremptorily refused to trans-
port any more stock, about sixteen thousand animals passed from the
south on that route. At Cairo the splenic fever appeared about the end
of May, or beginning of June; at Farina, early in July; at Tolono, on
the 20th of July; and thence, at later periods, usually dating five weeks
from the time the Texan cattle were driven onto the roads and pastures,
where disease afterward appeared. The majority of the cattle, amount-
ing probably to ten thousand, were handled by the railroad people at
Tolono; and Mr. Charles Troyford, of that place, who had lost forty-
eight out of ninety-eight [linois cattle by the disease, at the time of our
visit, informed me that he had not seen a single Texan steer diseased,
8
114 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. ;
out of the whole ten thousand; the feeding, driving, and delivering of
which he had personally superintended.
From the commencement of my inquiries, [ had considered it highly
probable that cases of splenic fever would be found even among south-
ern stock; and rewards were offered, at Tolone and elsewhere, to any
one who would indicate cases alive or dead. Considering that, wher-
ever we traveled, the people whose stock had been destroyed were most
anxious to furnish us the positive proof, if such could be obtained, it is
remarkable that not a single case was brought under our notice.
T returned to Chicago, and again had occasion to inspect both Texan
and [linois cattle in the slaughter-houses; and having, by that time,
ascertained the means whereby even the latent forms of the disease
might be discovered after death, I had no difficulty in tracing lesions in
Steers reputed healthy, and slaughtered for human food. This infor-
mation I communicated at once to Dr. Rauch, medical officer of health
of the city of Chicago, who invited me to address a meeting of the
board of health, on Tuesday, the 18th of August; and, as what I then
stated is of material moment in the history of developments made by
me on this subject, [ do not hesitate to transcribe, from the short-hand
writer’s notes, the following passages :
Iwas called upon, a fortnight ago, to reply to the question whether, if any of the
flesh of the sick animals happened to be sold, it was probable that human beings
might suffer? I unhesitatingly asserted then, what I repeat now, that the meat is not
poisonous, and is incapable of injuring human beings. . To that opinion I adhere.
If I should be asked what regulations should be made by city authorities, in relation
to the traffic in diseased meat, I have simply to declare, what I have said for many
years past, viz., that it is impossible to draw a line between health and disease, except
as the two conditions are known to medical men; and, notwithstanding the apparent
disadvantages of condemning more meat than there is any necessity for, it is essential
that a sanitary officer should be supported, on the broad general principle, that a dis-
eased animal is an animal unfit for human consumption.
The danger of an abundant supply of animal food, the produce of animals affected
with Texan fever, has almost passed. Some farmers and shippers have learned
that it is not safe to send stock to such markets as these, and the action of this, as of
other boards of health, has no doubt been already beneficial.
But any system of inspection now to be adopted must almost inevitably fail, if
directed mainly to the condition of live stock at the Union stock yards.
It is in the slaughter-houses that a ready means of ascertaining the real condition of
cattle can be secured; and the recognition of the Texan fever rests in the examination
specially of the spleen, which is much increased in size, sometimes before animals
show any external signs of sickness. A medical inspector would likewise detect blood
extravasations in the internal organs, ulcerations of the stomach, and, as the disease
advanced, bloody urine; but the most satisfactory sign, for the purpose of meat inspec-
tions, is the condition of the spleen. The flesh of animals slaughtered, when affected,
shows no signs of morbid change, so that it is essential to examine the internal organs
in order to draw conclusions as to the condition of any carcass.
On the 20th of August we left for St. Louis, Kansas City, ad Abi-
lene. We met with cases of splenic fever in the first named city; but,
from the manner in which the Texan droves are segregated while
awaiting their transfer to the cars at Kansas City, the indigenous stock
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. 115
in that district was found healthy. At Junction City we found a herd
of sick cattle which had crossed the Texan trails at Salina, having been
used in the west for draught purposes. We proceeded to Abilene, the
center of the shipment of Texan steers. It had been confidently
asserted that the stock, driven by easy stages from Texas through the
Indian Territory and unsettled lands of Kansas, had communicated no
disease; but this we found erroneous, as the indigenous stock around
Abilene had suffered, and herds had just been seized, from among which
we had ample opportunities for examining such cattle, both alive and
dead.
We learned at the Drovers’ Cottage that, scattered along the creeks
at intervals of four or five miles, large herds of Texan cattle could he
seen Over a distance of forty or fifty miles. This led us to undertake a
journey across the prairie, as far down as Big Turkey Creek, near the
Little Arkansas River; and it is but just that publicity be given to the
anxiety manifested, and assistance tendered us in our investigations, on
the part of the gentlemen engaged in the southern trade. Major Call,
who owned two of the largest herds, zealously undertook the necessary
arrangements for our journey; and, by this means, we had an opportu-
nity of examining carefully considerably over fifteen thousand head of
cattle, which had arrived at their destination during the months of July
and August.
In general terms, it may be said that the whole stock indicated how
much better it is for cattle to be driven slowly, where there is an ample
supply of food and water, than it is to transport them, even for two or
three days, in railway cars. There was a difference in ae herds accord-
ing to the speed they had maintained on the journey, and it appears
that an average walk of eight miles daily, over the whole journey, is as
much as the cattle should be subjected to, in order to secure improve-
ment, rather than deterioration, in their condition. The best drovers
avoid shouting and the stock-whip; and much depends on the intelli-
gence of the person who superintends a herd as to the selection of the
best grazing ground, and searching for a sufficient supply of water.
The creeks, scattered throughout the whole of the prairie lands of
Kansas, dry up in sumer, and cattle must sometimes be driven thirty
or thirty-five miles before water can be found. This israre; but, under
the most careful management, the driving of cattle from Texas to any
point on the eastern division of the Union Pacific road at or west of
Abeline, is attended with some such inconvenience. Nevertheless,
wherever proper supervision is exercised that the animals may never be
overheated, it is found that they improve in condition, grow stout and
hardy, and are in fit state for slaughter at the end of their journey on
foot.
Of the stock we examined, two hundred head of Indian cattle, from
the Chickasaw Nation, were in pasture five miles from Abeline, and all
appeared in very fine condition. The greater part of the remaining
116 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
stock we inspected was from northwestern, from central and from east-
ern Texas.
The only evidence of suffering was, at first, lameness, which in some
cases was due to injuries from animals fighting, or spraining themselves
in getting through difficult places. At times a steer gets lame from the
long sharp grass, wounding the skin between the hoof; and at other
points, as on Smoky Hill, the stony surface, with angular fragments of
iron-stone and other hard and sharp bits of flint, wounds the feet and
disables a considerable number of cattle.
On Smoky Hill we found, on the 27th of August, a herd which had
been collected, from forty to two hundred miles from the coast, in South-
ern Texas, between the Ist and the 18th of May. They arrived at Smoky
Hill on the 22d of August. Two animals had died on the route; one
died after getting lame, and the other refused to eat, was depressed,
languid, and passed blood with the excreta. At the time of our visit,
there were twenty or thirty animals which looked gaunt and weak, but
we were told that they were work-oxen in poor condition. One animal
was lame and stiff, but was reported as improving in condition. Another
had died during the night, and we proceeded to examine its internal
organs. It was a dun Texan steer, four years old, that had been stam-
peded with others the day before, and shortly afterwards had succumbed.
The body was still warm, and free from all trace of decomposition. The
skin and subcutaneous tissues presented no mark of injury or disease.
The organs of respiration were healthy. The heart, of normal volume
and consistency, was ecchymosed at its apex, and circumscribed blood
extravasations dotted the reflection of pericardium over and around the
pulmonary artery. The right cavities of the heart contained a small
clot of blood, and the left wereempty. The endocardium was of normal
color and thickness throughout. The mouth, fauces, pharynx, cesopha-
gus, and the first three stomachs were healthy. The fourth, or true
stomach, was reddened over its entire mucous surface. The folds at the
cardiac end were of a deep red, with numerous petechiz scattered irregu-
larly over their surface. The petechize were usually dark in the center,
where the membrane was softening, and of a lighter crimson hue on their
circumferences. Many were round, and others of irregular shapes, either
from coalescence of several extravasations or the irregular spreading of
one original bleeding spot.
The small intestine, of a reddish or purplish hue externally, was the
seat of ramified redness, with some petechiz scattered throughout its
whole extent. Peyer’s glands were healthy. The ileum was, however,
more congested than the duodenum or jejunum.
The cecum, somewhat reddened on its entire mucous surface, was
striped with blood extravasations which had occurred along the promi-
nent edges of the mucous folds at its fundus, and there were several
well defined ecchymoses scattered irregularly over the whole lining. The
color was more or less reddened throughout, until near its termination,
.
SE EE eee EE Ol Oe De
a _
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. be i
where it had a natural color. The rectum was not discolored, but near
the anus there was a small patch with a thin film of coagulated blood
on its unabraded gurface, and, when the membrane wrinkled by the ac-
tion of the sphincter, the free margin of the folds was streaked with
interstitial deposit of blood. The spleen, of a dark purplish color,
weighed three and a half pounds, and its structure was soft and friable.
The liver was of normal size and color, but the gall bladder appeared
thickened from an exudation of yellow serum in the substance of its
coats. These appeared three or four times their normal thickness. The
small arteries and veins of the mucous membrane were much distended
with dark blood, and there was also some capillary congestion.
The kidneys were healthy. , The bladder was moderately distended by
clear-colored urine, but its mucous surface, reddened at the fundus, was
dotted with small petechiz of a vermilion hue at and around the neck
of the organ.
Failing to obtain further evidence of splenic fever in this and an ad-
joining herd, from a careful inspection of the animals, I determined on
having some of them caught and examined with a self-registering ther-
mometer. Four steers, caught with a lasso, indicated a temperature of
103.4°, 102.49, 103°, and 104.29. This indicated a somewhat exalted
temperature for animals which to all appearances were in health; and I
ras fortunate in getting an animal that had been used in a wagon driven
quietly to camp, and then examined. This indicated a temperature of
103° Fahrenheit. My conviction that the lasso would not vary the
temperature was thus confirmed, and it is hard to reconcile the observa-
tions made with perfect freedom from disease.
_The inspections of herds grazed on and near the Santa Fé road, and
inquiries among drovers and herders, failed to bring to light any other
cases of sickness or death; and the evidence of Texan cattle suffering
from splenic fever, so far as our observations in Kansas go, rested on the
very marked case examined at Smoky Hill, on the high temperature
manifested by animals in the undoubtedly infected herd, and on the ob-
servations as to the relative weights of spleens in healthy and sick cattle,
reported in the foregoing pages.
Notwithstanding, however, the favorable report which can be made
regarding the general appearance of southern herds, it is proved by the
experiences of past years, and of this, that they disseminate disease
among cattle north or west of the Gulf States. The impression was left
on my mind, after the first observations of the malady, that the Texan
steers might be found to communicate the disease only for a limited time
after leaving Texas. There is reason to believe that such is the case,
though we found that two months’ journey, from Texas to the Union
Pacific road, had not sufficed to effect this object. Experiments on this
point would be desirable, though expensive, and demanding much time
and attention. We were told, however, that the cattle which had in-
duced so much disease at Farina, on being removed to Loda, were placed
118 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
on lands which brought them in contact with Hlinois cattle, and no bad
results ensued. Mr. Robert Clark, of Indianola, who has had great ex-
perience in driving cattle through Missouri into Hlinois, states it as his
decided opinion, from repeated observation and inquiries among drovers,
that the Texan steers are most dangerous immediately after leaving
Texas, and hence the great opposition to their importation into Missouri;
but that, after they have traveled a long distance, they were far less
liable to do any mischief. This point is of great importance in relation
to means which might be suggested for the prevention of the disease,
and it is worthy of note that, without doubt, cattle driven into Kansas,
Missouri, or other States, in the summer or autumn of one year, grazed
in such State during the winter, fail to retain any deleterious principle,
and can readily be intermixed with any stock during the winter and
spring. Texan herds, therefore, do purify themselves; and the point of
greatest importance in relation to the traffic in such stock is to establish,
without doubt, what length of time is required for such purification, and
if means can be adopted to accelerate so desirable a result.
NON-TRANSMISSION OF THE DISEASE BY NORTHERN OR BY WESTERN
STOCK.
During the three months last summer, too many well-marked cases
have been seen of communications of splenic fever to Illinois and to Indi-
ana cattle. At first these animals were allowed to die; but, as soon as
large herds of grazing stock were attacked, an effort was made to save
what could be saved, by shipping and sending to eastern markets. Cat-
tle trucks have thus been filled in large numbers with infected steers,
and they have died or been slaughtered and committed to the rendering
tanks. But not a single case has transpired to show that these animals
have induced, directly or indirectly, any disease in the stock of Eastern
States. How different from this is the working of a contagious disease !
Had any malady of the nature of rinderpest or lung plague been favored
in its transmission, as this one has been, the farmers of Ohio, Pennsyl-
vania, and New York would have similar bitter experiences to record,
to those of the much-injured Illinois farmers. That which is obvious,
in relation to the progress of the disease through the country, is also
apparent in any district invaded by the disease. None but southern cat-
tle communicate disease, and they rarely if ever do any mischief through
stock yards and cattle cars, and only by feeding on pastures over which
other stock is apt to roam and feed. No case has been brought forward
to show that a railway car, loaded with Texans, will communicate dis-
ease to other stock afterward placed in such car. Numerous instances
of this description would have come to light, had we been dealing with
what is commonly understood as a contagious plague.
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER: OF CATTLE. 119
COMMUNICATION IN STOCK YARDS.
The earlier reports from Cairo stated that the cows in that city had
caught the disease from the Texan cattle in steamboat and railway pens.
Indeed we were informed that many of the Cairo cows had been in the
habit of wandering not only near, but into, the cattle pens, and eating
the hay the Texans left behind them. This is the only observation that
would give color to the view that hay might be a means of propagating —
the disorder. But we learned, at Cairo, that Texan cattle had been
loose on the common within the levee, and some stray animals had
remained for some days on the very prairie which is the only pasture
for the cattle of the town. It was impossible to find a single case which
afforded reliable grounds for supposing that the only chance for con-
tamination was in the cattle pens of Cairo. ee
It may be suggested that eating hay which has been poisoned, must
be as bad as eating prairie grass over which Texan steers have wandered.
But there is this difference, that cattle are not apt to eat hay on which
the excretions of other cattle have been deposited, and they would
attempt to pick up only the clean fodder. On grass lands the growth of
grass, and the washings of the pasture by rains, clear off the filth,
though they may often leave adhering deleterious principles which are
swallowed. o Date. 3 3 Date. 3 i}
= B es B = Bi a =
a) | M 4 mM =) nN |
4
Neptaddeeee |e taelomlilasent.d5secl) dda mle iiSeptalds-..) 2 12 l'Septe18e-.:| | 1 16
14 | 16 1 12 im b 13 2 12
me |) 7 14 9 1 10 2 13
Sept. 15\.-..|/ 14 || 14 14] 14 14 9 13 15
14 | 12 2 15 2 11 2 12
ieb |) ale) Tat 2 12 1 10
14 | 12 1 12 14] 13 14 12
14} 12 1 12 13] 15 13 13
3] 1 14] 15 2 13 2 14
14] 14 1 lL 14] 15 Q ui)
1 12 134] 11 2 10 12 13
1 ) 14 | 12 Q 10 14 15
Tea 13) 2 Qt] 12 2 a
14|] 12 Qi) 13 1 10 1} il
14 8 1 11 14] 12 14 10
13] 14 14] 10 2 10 14 ll
1% | 10- is |, a2 1 12 es 12
1 12 14} 11 14] 11 13 13
2 15 1 LON iSeptelGiees|(a ale 14. 14 9
] 12 14] 11 Q 16 14 10
al 12 Q 13 Teale aly) 14 10
1 12 2 13 Te 6 1 12
14] 12 1 9 is il a5) 1 10
1 12 mee |) ail 14] 15 ies 9
isl a2) Q 12 ie | Dye 13 12
14] 1. i 11 14] 17 14 10
1 12 1 11 14 | 12 13 14
1 12 14} 13 14] 13 1 15
1 11 ¥] 1 14] 13 14 z
1 11 14] 12 1 14 14 15
1s) 12 14] 12 14] 14 2 17
1 9 1¢ | 13 1 13 1 16
Q alt 1 11 14} 14 14 14
14 | 13 eel) nil Tes | 1S} 14 13
1 12 . 1 13 14] 14 1 12
14] 10 14] 12 14] 14 J 11
14] 12 TL 10 14] 15 14 13
1 10 14} 12 14] 15 1 15
Tes | ae iL 8 ee || a7 1 10
1 13 1 10 1 14 1 IL
Q 15 1 11 1 14 ii 13
2 12 1 9 1 13 14 12
14] 13 1 itil 14] 13 1 14
|p oe 1 10 2 15 1 4
14] 13 eS |) Til 14 || 12 1 13
ii | 14 14] 15 1 13 1 12
14 | 14 We Ie “14 | 15 1 13
We ave 14} 14 14 | 19 1 12
14] 12 2 15 ie || aig} 1 13
1 16 14] 15 14} 14 2 15
ie |) ae 1 ll 1 13 1 17
14 | 14 14 | 12 1 15 14 15
Q 16 14 | 16 14] 13 1 14
ipealy ae Q 16 14] 13 1 12
De 13 14] 11 I 10 14 13
14] 14 Q 12 1 13 1 14
13 | 12 4] 11 14} 14 1 15
14] 10 2 12 1 13 14 14
14./ 10 91 | 13 14 | 12 1 15
1 10 2 12 14] 13 14 14
1 10 14] 14 14] 14 14 15
Tee) alah Q 12 1 13 25 17
17] 13 24 | 13 1i | 12 1 16
14| 13 14] 11 1 12 14 14
Q 14 2 12 1 13 i 13
1 13 2 lL 14] 14 1 12
14 |] 13 14} 12 iL 1L 1 lL
14] 13 1 10 1 i) 14 13
14] 12 14] 12 £ | 14 14 14
12 |) a3 2 10 2 15 1 15
1 12 Te) ta 2 12 1 10
14] 13 14] 11 14} 1g 14 IL
iss |) aig} Q 10 iz) 14 13 13
14] 12 Th | Wl 1 15 il 14
ly) Alf) QO |tSeptelSeeei Teas 1 il
1 11 14 8 14] 16 1 a
1 10 1 14 14] 14 14 12
TE Mal) 14] 10 Te als 1 13
a it 8 2 17 1 14
150
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
Native cattle—Continued.
FEMALE,
wn n na m
A =| a a
Date. 2 Date. 38 Date. 2 Date. 3
Q Qa [ov Q
M MD R RM
Sept.18.....| 14 |Sept.18 &20.| 14 Sept.18&20.| 12 Sept. 24... :
1 1 1
1 14 14 1}
i 4 2 1
14° 12 14 14
2 13 4 1}
1 2 1 i
1k 14 14 14
1 ) 1 14
1 1¢ 1} 1}
1 1 ies 1}
1 13 1 1
1 14 14 14
14 Q 14 ik
14 12 14 1
1 14 14 14
14 1 ie 14
1 14 1} 1}
12 1 14 1}
14 13 14 1
Q Q 1 14
Q 1} 14 14
14 1 1 14
2 14 14 1}
] 14 14 i
1 13 1 iy
1 1 14 14
14 14 14 14
1 Q 1 14
1 QL 14 1
14 11: 14 1g
] 1 ies Q
(ll il 14 1t
14 14 14 14
1 2 13 1
2) ji 14 14
2) Q 1 it
14 14 14 14
14 14 1 1
1 14 14 14
1 14 14 14
14 1 1 14
Q 14 1 “Ht
1 Q 14 1
13 1} 1 14
1 1 1 14
1 12 1 ik
14 1 14 13
2 13 1g 12
14 2 1 1
1k lz 14 1}
ik 13 9 1
3 1 Sept. 24...) 14 1
2 12 1 q
14 ict 14 14
1 "Q 14 14
2 15 1 1
14 1 ik 14
13 14 1 1
14 13 14 14
1 1 t A
ept.18&20, 2 13 13
Rep 14 1 it 1
14 Q 1 14
14 14 14 14
14 1 4 1
iy 14 1 14
13 14 14 14
al 2 14 Total 23% 1
2 14 14 | 1$
14 ies 1 | Average .-| 10
14 13 14 | 7 4414!
i i re 1, 4414
1, 423
|
——
EEO ee a ae
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. 151
Native cattlek—Continued.
MALE AND FEMALE.
A an a wa a a A wa
Date. 3 5 Date. 3 3 Date, 3 8 Date. 3 oD
aol ic mes eel, Ss &
i) = RM =| mM | mM =)
August 20... 1 12 August 20. 1 9 Sept. 2... 14 12 Sept. 2.... 2 1]
® 14} 14 ety] ail 1i| 14 Q 124
2 gL 1 et 14] 14 2 9
iPS || 8} 1 14 2 16 2 10
il 15 1 12 1%) 15 1} il
13] 16 14] 14 14} 14 14 iL
Q 94 14 | 12 14} 14 14 12
Q 14 1k 9 14 | 15 14 12
| 13 14] 12 1 id Sept, Saaee| | 2 10
13 | 12 1 14 WS || a 4 9
1 12 1 12 ie) 1S QL 13
1 13 14 9 14} 15 Qs 16
te | 13 1 12 14} 16 Qf 10
1 12 | 13 1 114 Q 10
14 | 14 2 14 2 gt Q 11
Q 12 2 16 .14] 113} Qf 13
Q 13 2 18 14} 11 Qt 15
Q 15 13 gi ii | 12 Qh 15
13] 18 1 14 14] 12 Dy) 10
14] 16 14] 15 iPS aint 14 il
1 12 1 12 We || aie 12 13
1 ot 12 | 16 ies) ig Q 12
134] 14 il 12 i |} a Q 12
1 12 1¢ || 15 Q 12 Qh 13
1 4 1 14 2 13 Qh 14
14| 12 1 15 | Q 10 3 14
1 12 1 12 14 9 3 13
vs |) Te 1 9 14 gt Qt 14
1 15 14 8 1 9 Qi 12
1 16 #] 12 1 gL 13 10
il 12 £ gt 2 12 14 8
2 9 g 8 2 10 14 ae
Q 10 1 9 2 ll ty Gi
Tz | 14 14 92 | Fs al?) 1 10
1 15 , 1 12 1 9 14 9
14| 13 1 12 14 | 12 14 9
1 14) Sepia Qeeeney a 16 1 10 14 12
1 12 Jz | 18 1 13 Q 10
P) 13 13)] 14 2 gh Qh 9
Ll 9 2 | 20 1 iil 1 9
13] 12 14 | 14 i 12 it 104
1 14 1 13 13} 10 2 lL
Q 15 14] 12 1k} lL Q 12
Q 17 14) 14 2 104 QL 12
1 14 13| 13 2 11 14 12
1 13 1 14 2 12 13 12
14 | 14 2 20 1 11 1 il
1 15 14} 14 1 12 2 12
il 16 Q 20 14} 10 Qt 10
14! 16 It | 14 1 114 QF 9
1 14 1 13 1t 12 ) §
14] 15 14 | 12 1 es 2g 10
1 12 132 | 14 1 11 OL il
1 13 TE || a8} 14 | 10 14 12
1 143 1 13 1 94 2 9
14 9 12) 14 1 9 2 10
14] 12 13] 12 1 8L oh 9
2 14 1 16 13 9 2 10
Q 15 ie8)||\ ais} u 8i Q il
14} 16 1i | 14 1 8 2 12
2 17 1 14 1 84 Q il
13 | 16 14 | 14 14 9 Sept. 4.5..| 1 a 14
14] 12 1 13 it BL 14 12
1#| 10 14) 15 14 8 14 14
1%} 12 14| 18 i 8 14 14
1 16 Ta 14 14 94 1} 12
Q 18 Tee ale 1 10 13 10
14 | 16 ae Te 14] 10 12 14
12 eae 118 it 11 14 14
1 12 14] 16 1 11 14 16
Q 10 We 14 1S vis 12 14
1 12 13 | 14 1 10 1¢ 14
if) 13 Q 19 14} 12 1} 12
if 14 14) 18 2 9} Q 14
1 15 i 13 2 12 14 13
12) 16 14 | 14 14] 10 3 18
eel) 12 14 | 14 1 104 14 14
Ji | 14 1 14 net |) alt 14 19
152 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
Native cattlh—Continued.
MALE AND FEMALE.
wi a i wa : a
| wi a 2 a zi A Pa
Date. 3 5 Date. o ® Date. 3 o Date. Es 3
| ta fe emis a |e
M =| mM | mM A i) =|
Sept. 4-.<:. 13.) dasdl| Sept. Tek.) 121) 2agall Sept: %..2.| “BETS8 ll iSapt, 10/-2)) vale iit
Sept Oseeee 1 16 ie |) iil 1 16 12 12
13 | 14 ib |[ abe 14) 15 14 15
1 15 12) 12 2 20 14 15
14} 18 1 12 14 | 18 13 142
14 | 16 2 | 113 TS |) i! 1 12
14} 15 13/ 11 1 12 1 10
13/ 14 13 | 12 14 | 16 14 gt
Te a7 ike || aie} It | 14 14 13
a9|oae iS |} 1) 1k | 15 14 13
TEM) 155 2 11 Te ae 1 13
18 |] Q 10 1 13 1 9
14} 15 TY) 14] 14 Q gt
14 | 18 14 | 10 || els 14 152
14) 17 1 il ie |) Te) ia 11
ee |) ay Te) 12 Tee |) a ii 12
Q 11 14] 114 14] 14 14 13
14] 13 1 12 i lh ay 14 g3
2 13 ie 13 14 | 15 1 15
ii | 14 13 94 14 | 14 1 8
14 | 10 14| 12 Q 18 14 13
22 9s 1¢ | 10% ies || aly 14 12
14 | 10 2 94 14 | 15 | 18 12
er 14) 103 1) 9 2 15
1 | 24: Tes |) iil 1 16 2 163
o)) 184 ap | 12 14 | 14 | 14} lt
24) 114 14] 10 14 | 18 | Ik 12
Q 132 1 Ox ES ig L 14
13] 13 12] 10 8 | 44 14 13
1 10 1 123 || Sept. 9.-..| 14 | 103 2 12%
dey |) ali 13 13 1 Ta 1 12
Q 9 14] 11 Q 12 il 13
Q OL ay | ae! 14] 13 ik 14
14) 114 or} 13 14 15 2 10
134} 11 oy || il 1 14¢ | 2 15
14 | 13 ipa || ae) 2 124 | 1k 10
14 91 1 11 1 130" 14 14
2 | 103 ey) We 1} gh 14 13
2 gz 1 11 wee || a5 14 10
ee at 97183 is |) 20 De ile, | 1} 11
14 | 134 1 10 ee IPP By | 14 12
14|/ 10 1 12 e's |) | 2 13
1 124 ies) 28} 14 | 103 Qh 134
1 ga 1 10 | 15 | 1 15
ies | aul Ti) 12 Te |) To) 4) 1k 9
1351] aaLO 1 92 1 ||| a5: 4 2 aes
Hee || eye Te 2 2 144 1t 11
12) 113 ee fe alg} 2 15 1 12
Tee | ati iON) Til ; 14 | 103 14 13
Q 154 2 | 10 1 12 ii 11
14} 11 Ve ali 14 13) | 2 14
2 13 93 | 12 1 154 | 13 15
eal 3 eS |LY 15} 14 | 10 14 14
13 | 113 3 13 ei} ey | 1 10%
ee 2 | 10 14 | 11g 2 15
Q 114 3 15 Te | 144 4 13
9 | 12 1 | a3 14 | 16 14 114
it 92 Q1| 14 || Sept. 10...) 14 12 1; 13
14 gi 14] 16 1g | 13 Hn ie
14] 93 1 13 1: 14
4 | 19° 2 | 10 i 114 || Sept. 11---) 1 10
13} 94 24 | 10 ae |) ality 1y 13
1 9 93] 11 14 | 103 £ 8
2 | 10 93 | 19 14 9 1 14
13 | 12 14} ll a |) i an i
1 il 2 13 1 10 4
Beet aes 12 | 10 9 | 15 1 | 12 14 | 12
1 12 3 | 10 eal 10 1 13
1 13 14] 10 2 12 2 9
13} 10 13| 13 Qi) sl 1 a
14] 103 Tae 16 2 12 aC 13)
| 113 Teo 18} 14 | 14 ] 14
Q 8 14) 12 1 10 1 14
Qt | a2 apes | 15 they 15
Tey) aes By tat) 1f | 15 1 10
14} 12 Q 11 1 11 2 16
ey iO By || a6 2 9 1 14
a/ 9 Sines 13 | 13 1 15
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE.
Native cattle—Continned.
MALE AND FEMALE.
153
a sa a a mn x
2 hae s | 8 at lige 5 z
Date. & 3 Date. D 3 Date. Ey ® Date. 3 o
Yar E By 2 a > a &
NM 4 DQ 4 mn 4 7 |
Nepty Uleoes| ewan! as Sept. [ees |e 15 Sept. 14... 14 14 Sept. 14...| i4 15
1+ 16 14 10 ips 10 1¢ 14
1 9 IY 9h 1 15 i] 14
2] 10 14 | 14 it | i6 14 15
1+ 13 Q 16 ] 14 14 1153
14 14 2 15 1d 13 i 9+
1 12 24 15 14 14 2 12
1 14 14 12 2 12) 14 i
1 15 1+ 14 Qt 13 14 15
14 13 14 9+ 24 16 1 16
ON eas 1) &) 14 | 10 3 at
1 9 2 | 16 iz |) iil 1 12
2] 10 Tal ays 12 | 10 1 14
14 13} 1k 13 2 12 1 12
Q gt oF | i Q 14 1 14
2 12 24 13 1d 15 2 12
Q 11 “ 2 14 1 12 14 14
Tee || als; 1 |) 3 2 10 1} gt
14 14 14 15 i 14 1 12
98] 15 14] 14 i | io) 1} 12
te) 8 1i | 192 1 | 10 2 gL
14 14 1 10 1 9 uae 1 114
1 15 14 14 £ 8 2 12
We) iil 1 12 £ 8 2 14
] 10 1 13 1 12 1 14
i 164 13 gt 14 15 i 14
2 12 14 104 2 91 1 15
1 13 2 12 1 14 1i 13
i || a a1] 13 14] 15 2 14
14 12 2 12 1 12 1 14
1t 14 1k 15 1¢ 114 1 15
13 | i 1i | 16 g 8 2 13
2 13 1L 17 1 11 Be 14
IBS || ale! if 14 14 10 ||Sept. 15... 1 14
14 15 ) 1 9 14 14 1d 15
1+ 12 14 14 2 g 14 16
2 10 1 16 QL 9h 1 17
i 1 1 12 1 lL 1 gL
14| 12 Te | 15 1t | 12 14 14
1: 13 14 12 1+ 14 2 94
i 11 al 14 14 115) 2 12
eval) aint 2 ot 2 QL 1 14
1£ 12 2 14 2 16 1 15
1¢ 12 24 15 14 12 2 10
14/ 11 ] 12 Te 15 2 114
14 al 14 13 1t 14 14 14
12} 13 2 15 14 144 1} 15
1 gt Q1| 16 | eee 1 13
1 1G yon 1 g4 2 10 1 15
ol 4 12] 92 u gt 14 16
1 12 9 = 1 12 2 12
al 14 14 12 1 14 iL 11
1 164 14 15 14 15 1 , 2
2, 12 12 16 1+ 16 1 14
1 16 2 15 1 12 1 118}
14 13 JI 14 1t 16 13 14
1+ 14 14 15 14 12 17 16
1 12 1 16 i 11 i 9
Sept. 14.... 1 12 11 14 14 9 3 10
13] 14 Q OL ie || a@ 1 14
at 15 2 10 1} 9 1 12
13 | 16 1¥ | 15 2 12 14 14
1¢ 13 2 13 14 14 1 ies
2g 94 23 14 il ie 1 11
2 16 14 16 1 12 iy 10
1 15 1 14 £ 8 14 9
12] 12 1p 13 1 12 2 11
14 10 2 14 14 14 1} 9
14) 82 9) | 14 1 15 a4 13
j+ 16 1 12 3 9 1 12
14] 14 14+] 13 3 gL 1 9
ii 8 2 14 4 10 Qt 13
l 9 Ie 15 3 ali 2 14
il 8 TG Spt TG 1 15
£ et 1} 12 ] 12 a! 12
2 19 94 1t 14 1¢ 10
1 12 14 14 Q 10 if liz
|| ae: 14 | 12 or | 14 1 14
154 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
Native cattle—Continued.
MALE AND FEMALE,
3 a a
5 Zz S zB 5 =
Date. d 5 Date. Ea 5) Date. 2 3 Date.
a 2 a Si a 2
M | I RM 4 M =|
Sept: dbsere| eal 17 || Sept. 16...) 1 14 |) Sept, 17-2.) | 1d) Jig |) Sept. 1s...
He || 1G 14] 15 1 12
5s gt 1 123 2 13%
£| 12 1g) 15 13 13
$ | 10 1 10 | oath
12) 14 1 12 ij 4
14] 14 1 13 2 12
il 15 1 14 WEI) 18}
) 14 1 9 14 14
it 1 cee 2) 12 Sept. 23...
1 12 | 1 74 4 | 11
il 13 2 15 1 12 1
13 | 14 14 |] 13 2 15 2
1 11 ee || sat ) 13 14
il 8 1 12 ] 9 1
£) gf 1 13 1} 12 14
2 14 14} 11 oy 2
14 | 16 1 13 14)" 13 1g
1 13 2 14 2 14 i
14] 12 14 9 Qt) 15 14
I NOW| \sSepte L7see|\ 2 15 1 10 Ht
1 ope 22) 14 Q 12 14
2 1l 1 14 14] 14 1
Qi] 12 Q 14 |I 1 12 14
il 14 2 16 || Sept. 18...) 1 14 13
iF | 12 2D 15 14} 15 1
1 11 2 14 1 8s 14
13 | 14 It | 12 1a) aS 2
1 12 Q 15 13 114 D)
2 11 2 16 Q 9 12
14 9 14] 14 1 12 1
$ 2 1 15 2) 13 14
t 8 2) 13 2 15 1
2) 9 Q 143 1 12 14
Ora me Q 15 1 ‘9 2
1 114 eae 14 | 14 1
13 9 1 et 14} 12 14
ae Ie sie 1 gt Ts ty ate) 1
14] 15 | 9 14} 14 2
Sept, 16: seeii 0 a 8 14 | 10 8: 13 14
1 || 1 8 14] 13% 1
it 8 £ 93 1 ) 1
Iz] ga 1 7 1 11 2
#/ 8 4g ve} 2 14 4
1 9} 1 9 14 15 Sept. 24..- 14
1 wv | 1 82 1S | eG iz
14 74 1 8 1 13 ii
1 14 cy 9 Q 11 1
14] 15 14} 10 ia ||| aa 14
J$ | 1423 1 7 1 13 1
ie) Til 12 et 1 15 1?
12 at 1 8 1g] 133 1
1i 9 es 9 14 16 14
1) al 13 8 . 1 9s 1
| 3 14] 12 1¢ 9 ; 1
14] 16 14) 12 2 12 12
2 14 | Dy) 14 2 12 1
1 11 Ee |) 8} Q 15 1
2 11 1 9 Q} | 14 1
14) 11 1 12 Teo 14 1
1 13 1 15 2 144 14
2 12 1k | 14 Q 16 1}
1 13 2 13 1i 15 1
1 17 14 | 134 14] 13 1
|) NG 1 12 ] 12 1£
Q 14 14] 13 1 10 14
13] 17 i | 15 | 14 1
Tey goa: 1 16 2 13 i
1i| 9 | 2 2 15 14
14 | 16 te ale! ei It
Q 164 14 | 16 14 16 1k
] 18 il 12 1 12 1
12 | 14 2 12 Iz} 13 2
1) 13 1 gt | 2 14 2
13 | 16 TBS P13 Qi] 16 2
1 13 13) 14 1% | 134 14
2 16 2 12 2 14 aps
OO EEE EE EE ee
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE.
Native cattle—Continued.
MALE AND FEMALE.
155
a : é ; é . a ;
ae Bl as a z Sal)
Date. 3 © Date. 3 3g Date. S ® Date. z a)
ee alles e z a &
mM 4 wn =) mn | mM |
Sept. 24.... 12 | 16 Sept. 25... dee) 2 Sept. 25... IPs 11 Sept. 25-.- 1 11
14 | 14 Tes, ak 1 11 1 8
Q 16 14) 10 ee | Tp 1 8
14] 15 . 1 12 14| 10 1 104
] 16 14 | 12 ies 8 1} 11
10 |) ai 1 13 ed ae 2 9
1 16 14) 12 14 9 Q 11
iL |) ales Q 13 1 10 14 11
1 14 2 11 14} 11 1k 12
1 15 93 / 13 1 12 1 9
ee |) a0) 1 10 Q 11 1 12
Ta |e 1 12 14) 14 4 13
1 13 Q 15 1 15 1 12
14 |$ 12 134| 14 1 10 13} «14
ee | Ties 1 12 14} 12 ] 12
1 16 1 11 ne || ig} 14 13
1 12 14 | 10 14) 14 1 14
14 | 92 1 9 1 14 1 12
14 | 12 14] 12 1 11 1 14
1 14 1 8 1 194 | 2 15
1 15 13 8 1 11 13 38
ap ual aD) ean) 1 112
1 94 Te) ail TS dO a eelotslueeee 1, 9634 16, 6793
ca ail 1 13 ie) a1} =
Sept. 25.... 3t | 13h 1 gi 13 12 Average --|]. 467 |12. 466
Cherokee cattle.
MALE,
|
Nept; Secs 2 10 || Sept. 13..- - 8 || Sept. 14... 25 12 | Sept. 15... Qs 13
1 10 14 12 31 11 2 12
Q 10 ) 13 10 3 14 1k 1L
14 12 Qa 12 14 10 14 11
2 9 2 12 ) 9 2 13
1 ii Qn 10 3 10 12 9
Q 10 |) o1 14 Qt 9 14 9
13 8 || it lI 3 12 1: 8
Sept, 9: s2:- 2 10 14 9 2 11 14 11
14 9 || 4 12 2 10 13 12
2 10 Q 15 2 10 2 12
2 13 14 10 3 10 14 11
1 8 2 14 || Sept. 15-..| 14 8 14 12
‘ 1¢ 8 14 12 14 7 2 13
Sept. 10....) 13 7 ies 10 14 8 1k 9
14 9 14 10 2 12 Iz 10
2 12 2 12 14 13 2 1l
13 By), Qu 15 14 9 14 12
13 / 2 10 2 13 14 10
14 9 || 13 12 | 14 9 94 14
14 13 || 12 13 2 10 4 10
ik 8 || 2 13 2 10 13 11
1 8 it 12 Q 10 4 11
14 10 Q4 16 QL 12 14 TL
14 ll Q 12 Q 13 1i 10
14 10 1k 9 2 12 13 11
13 11 Q 12 14 11 1k 12
2 10 || 13 14 2 12 ii 10
1 10: || Sept. 14...) 24 14 2 12 4 9
13 10 || Q 12 | 14 11 14 13
Qn 14 || 14 9 13 10 4 12
1} 14 || 14 13 14 11 2 13
14 10 14 10 1+ 10 14 13
Sept. 13:5--| i 12 14 13 13 11 14 11
14 13 ips 12 Q 12 14 9
14 14 14 10 Q 12 if 1l
Q 13 4 10 Q 12 14 10
24 10 14 10 1} 11 14 11
D) 12 2 14 14 9 2 13
2 12 134 10 14 8 Q 12
2 13 4 12 Q 1l 14 11
1 12 Qn 15 14 11 14 9
13] eS 14 il 14 12 14 9
14 10 | 2 10) 2 12 14 1
14 10 | 2 ll 14 lL 2 13
156 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
Cherokee cattle—Continued.
MALE,
a a ca a
f= mn S m a m a nm
Date. o 5 Date. 3 3 Date. 3 3 Date. % 5
a 2 eo i = a = P
NM = MN 4 2) 4 M Hw
|
Sept. 15.2...) 184) fa" ||Sent, 18.2) er HF |leSepte (Seas) emcee eel Ni Sept, sae ame 8 |
Q 13 1 7 il 13 il 9 |
Q 12 1 9 5) ¥ 14 7 |
) 13 14| 13 Qt 14 5 |
14 11 Q 14 Q 13 14 fT |
OL 14 teet| seal Qn 11 1 6 |
Q 13 iat ee Q 12 1 5
12 14 14} 8 14 10 1 7
Q 13 1 8 1k 10 14 8
2 13 iCall» a2) 13 10 = 1 9
Q 12 | 9 14 iL 1 7
ee 10 1 8 Q 11 14 8
14 11 i 9 OL 12 1k 9
ik 12 13 11 Qi 14 il 9
14 9 te, Qt 14 14 10
14 10 1 7 14 10 1t 10
Q 11 1 9 Q 12 1 8 |
Sept. 18.-..|/ 14 a 14 10 Q 12 | 1 7
1 7 1 |) @) 1 11 | 1 6
13 8 1 | . 13 14 10 1 5
1 7 1 11 14 13 14 Zk
1 5 ib |). ikl 2 ll 1 8
1 7 1 11 Qt 13 1 6
1 g 14 | 10 2 12 | 1k 7
13 8 1) peli 2 12 | 14+ 9
1 1 Q 13 Q 13 | 1 8
1 7 2 12 2 13 14 7
Q 9 1 11 13 11 | 14 7
14 8 2 12 1 11 | il 8
1 7 1k 13 14 13 | 14 9
1 6 2 9 14 10 | 1k 8
14 9 1 7 1 9) 14 7
Q 10 es 8 1 8 | 14 9
14 9 ij 9 1 11 1 8
1 7 14 9 14 13 || Sept. 25...| 14 9
14 10 13 9 1 ) 14 itis
1 8 1 8 1 10 Q 12
14 7 1 "Ff 14 10 14 9
Q 10 iL 8 14 lL 1 8
2 12 1 8 14 11 | 14 9
1 7 14 9 4 8 | 0) 11
1 9 2 10 1 FF 14 10
i4 11 14 1L res 8 Q 12
1 12 Q 13 14 9 | = ;
9 | 12 1 7 1 g ||) Dotelen =| Uta) emer
14 12 14 8 1 i) Average..| 1.60 | 10.335
FEMALE,
| !| {|
epte cere 1k LG Septal OSs |i TOM ESept ase. a2 15 || Sept. 14...) 12 9
14 10 | 13 12 ie 10 | 1k 8
2 10 |} |r| 14 8 14 10
Q 9 || Tee Sy Q 11 2 12
1 Ze 14 9 || 2 12 23 11
1 10 || 1 7 Qt 13 Q Tt
Q 10 | 14 13 || Sept. 14...| 14 13 94 9
) 9 14 10 || 14 15 | 13 8
2 8 it 12 ik 14 | 2 10
Rijn Oones- 1 5 14 10 14 12 | Q 10
14 9 1 11 14 13 | 14 10
1 6 1 7 pe 10 | Qh 9
14 12 1k 9 14 10 14 8
14 12 14 9 14 11 | Qh 9
Q 10 || 14 10 4 16 | 13 8
2 12aiSeptyl3ees| eee 15 1} 14 Qi 14
14 9 9} 12 14 10 | 14 9
14 9 14 8 14 10 14 11
ii 12 2 12 | 14 10 13 8
1 8 24 i4 Q 13 Q4 9
1 5 2 10 14 12 : Q 10
Q 10 14 12 ik 12 | 14] - ll
14 10 4 13 14 10 || Sept. 15...| 14 11
14 8 Q 14 14 12 | i4 10
Sept. 10....| 14 14 Qh 18 14 13 | 1 9
2 $_———E————_e eee
==
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. 157
Cherokee cattle—Continued.
FEMALE.
an mn wa wa
| an =| wn =| wn - a wn
Date. 3 5 Date. o a Date. 3 5 Date. 3 3
a e a e e& E a ‘
RM | M 4 RM 4 RM |
Sept. 15... 1 Geileseptitose ie Ie elsmlSeptatooe |) 9 ta ait Sept. 18... 1 12
{4 TBE ] 9 13 12 14 IL
14 lal 14 10 1} 1h 14 9
Ue 12 ad 1t 10 14 10 al 7
2 12 14 11 14 10 14 8
Q 13 1 9 1¢ 11 14 9
2 12 1 al 14 12 13 uf
4 14 14 12 Sept. 18... 14 d1 1 9
14 11 ify 12 1 9 il 8
14 il 14 11 . 14 13 14 9
eS |) Tl iPS |) “ail 1¢| 13 =
14 12 14 10 1} 11 Total.... 241 | 1.611
| 12 1H | dt 14 | 12 s
Ts 12 iy |) ul 14] 13 Average.| 1.585 | 10.6
MALE AND FEMALE,
Aug. 20.... 3 9 || Sept. 3....) 14 9) || Sept. 3--..| 2%) 20 Sept. 42... 14 9
3h 8 Q 10 De 9 14 11
3 12 Be 11 24 9 Qt 12
QF 10 Qt 10 Bes 9 24 12
2 if p} 11 2 8 22 11
2Q3 9 24 10 2s 9 Qt 1)
a 12 Qh 13 3 10 It 9
3 et Ore 10 23 10 14 9
3 11 Qt 12 2 9 2 10
3 92 2 10 Qt 9 2t 12
Sept. 2..... 3 gh Thos 2k | 16 14 a
33 iil 2 12 2 12 14 11
3 11 23 13 Qt 15 24 12
Qt 10 Q4 10 4 13 Qt 12
3 gz Q 13 2 10 2h 12
Qh 9 \ Q 10 2 11 Qt 1l
3 9 a1 | 12 2 | 10 1 9
3 10 24 13 3 11 1t 9
3 104 a 10 3 12 2 1l
3 9 | 9 2 9 2h 10
3s 9 13 10 2 15 Qt 1l
Sept. 3..... 21 | 10 See aul zh | 12 2 ll
QL 115} 1% ll 2 13 2 i,
ys 10 or 12 Qt 12 2 9
Cia ga 24} 11 Qi | 12 2 10
QF 14 oa 10 2 11 14 9
14 10 QL 12 3 apt Qt 11
14 11 2S 1L 14 12 24 10
a1 | 12 14] 10 || Sept. 4....| 2] 12 Qh 10
or 11 1} 12 2 10 24 12
es 13 or 12 Dre 11 Q4 11
2H) 14 ips 10 2h 13 23 13
Qr 12 Pes 11 2 9 Qt 11
2 13 at 12 1} 8 2 10
a1 | 13 21) 10 1-9 2 2
Qt 14 QL 8 14 8 1¢ 9
QL 14 Qh 8 14 10 1d iL
Qt 13 Qh 9 2 11 1? 10
22 | 12 23 | 10 ai | 12 Qh 13
2 14 Qt 9 24 12 Sept. 6.... 2 13
Qt 13 Qh 10 at ati 2t 13
an) 13 a] 8 ¥ 2 9 2 2
2F 14 24 10 2b 12 2} 13
23 13 Qt 10 24 10 iv 11
24 13 22 9 2 9 2 10
24 14 Q4 8 14 8 1+ 10
a1 | 13 21 | 10 2i) 12 1} 8
21] 13 Or ae Peleg res 9
24 13 2 8 2 12 14 Vl
2 10 Qt 8 14 10 Qt 13
2s 11 o4 10 2 12 Bas 13
2 1L Qh 9 ae 11 24 12
a: | 12 21 | 10 at | 11 2 10
HB} 11 at} 9 a1 | 12 2 9
2 10 Qt 8 23 a Dire 12
Qt 13 Qt 8 2 oI 25 11
24 | 11 Q4 9 14 9 24 13
Qh Qh 9 2 8 ii 9
158
Cherokee cattle—Continued.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
MALE AND FEMALE.
Date.
Spleens.
Date.
Date. »«
Date.
th
sR eR eR ee
WUWNUWNWNWNMNNWNNHWNNNNWE WD
} Re ee ee ee he
she eee
DH Hw?
FF pata
a
cf
)
Bp oh bp
MAM WDOWDH —KH WA
ee Re ee ARR
$a
WIDIMMAMMOMW 2
teh Bt to ee ea 2 top toe
Sept. 7..--
Sept. 10...
Sept. 11...
Sept. 14...
Be RE eee ep pen
£9 2D 0D 0D DD CO HW CO 09 09 09 0 09 19 09 09
pes woes bbe
eh
ee
Wot) oe ROD
~
kop es EE
Wits
eh Ge
Se ee Ee ee I CORO e
I
TS) pales Mefos nope ne pes nches
_
es
I
Sx)
os
ra
cc
_
oO
Sept. 14...
Sept. 16...
Sept. 17...
ed
ee
ISERIES RS BS tape tL es tee EE SB
HEE RS Bp Lom to ta foe pe tS to BS tp
COCO RROD BH 0
Ae 6 om
wp
es tp spe
oe
te ee
1p t= wp
a
CMoenmicmes
we
Oo C2 TD DD GO 9 1D 5 CO 09 09 2D Hw We GO WO SO
=)
Senta dvaee
Sept. 18...
Sept. 23...
Sept. 24...
Motalee=.
Average.
ewe
2 291 09 9
Depend eee
Sept. 10...
Teran
cattle.
MALE.
te he
eR
cs
he Rl he
2D 68 9 29 29 1 29.29 9 29.29 WI 2919
“e
| Sept. 10. ..|
DAD 1D 1D 1D WW OO
nee
eh eee
he
ree
WW 74
Sept. 10_..|
|
Sept. 11...)
|
|
Spleens.
7D Wt
zy
eee ee
Rete
Ke
Bee
ee
to
ER Ce Co CoE OT EOE BSS CRT ee CIE
p ne
ue
02 69 69 29 69 09 69 19 29
ee
20
Wie ee ce He
ue
QO DD DD WO CO RB CO
1 ees
wake eee
EEO ee
WP epee
9 09 29 C9 09 2919.19 CY ODT EH tO TD
S :
Ee ee
SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. 159
Texan cattle—Continued.
MALE.
- | - . .
m mm ™m m
q wa =| m =] ma a n
Date. & 5 Date. a) 3 Date. 3 3 Date. eo 5
eS 2 e ley a fe i Ei
Wear) i a) | DR 4 wm BK
Sepia lies |ens 14 | Sepi loee-i a 16 || Sept. 16...| 2 14) Sept. 18-:-| 3 1l
3 12 | Qh 15 14 iL OL 12
3 125) 2 12 14 12 14 11
3 12>) = Bl) ie Q 12 2 12
3 12 | 13 10 2 13 3 13
3 14 | 2 11 Qn 15 24 11
24 13 | 3 13 QL 15 3 12
24 12 | 3 12 Q1 13 2h 10
3 14 2 9 3 14 3 11
3h 13 3 12 Q 15 2 10
Qn 12 | 12 9 | 13 Qh 12
Q4 11 2 10 ai 13 Q ll
34 14 Qn 13 94 12 Qt 13
a4 10 | 14 12 2 12 3 10
Qh 14 2 12 OL 12 2 15
25 12 | Qn 13 Q ll 24 9
21 | 10 2 12 9 12 2
ped) aul 34 10 24 13 3 13
O41 10 | 2 11 ot 12 13 8
3 13 | 3 13 2 13 2 10
3 14 | aa] 12 9 14 3 15
3 12 | Q 12 Qt 13 3 13
34 13 | 3 13 Qt 12 3 15
Qh 14 2 15 | 2 14 3 10
Q 13 | |) 2 2 13 3 12
pe 14 2 11 2 12 Qt 15
2 13 3h 10 2 13 2 12
24 13 3 12 2 12 3 13
a4 12 | 23 13 14 11 2 12
2 9 | 3 10 14 11 3 11
Sept. 13... 3 14 | QL 9 14 10 4 12
24 13 | Qi 12 Q 12 oF 10
2 13 3 13 2 15 3 if
3 14 24 15 Qt 14 2a 13
Qe 11 ‘ Q 10 2} 13 2 10
34 16 3 12 2 13 3 13
3 Qi | o4 15 2 12 ot il
Q 10 | 3 10 4] 11 3 10
3 12 | Q4 13 14 10 or 12
3 13 || Sept. 16... ox 14 14 10 3 3
24 12 2 15 14 11 Q 10
34] 13 3 15 14 12 PEs lL
3 13 | QL 12 14 ll 3 13
Qh 16 | 2 13 wy} 12 Q 13
2 12 | 2 12 1 ll 1 il
OR 14 Q 13 1 12 i 11
3 13 | 2 12 2 13 1t 13
24 12 QL 13 3 14 13 10
3 13 | 13 11 o4 13 | 1 9
24 10 | 2 12 QL 13 1 8
2 12% 2 13 2 13 1 1L
2 14 Q 3 2 13 14 13
=e pe Qi 13 Q 13 2 13
Bolt ae 2 12 Q 13 ot 12
3a 15 || 2 13 1g 12 2 13
Sept. 14....! 92 10 | 24 14 2 13 14 ll
3 12 | Q 13 2 13 2 13
3 14 Q 14 2 13 Q 13
33 13 | 2 14 14 11 oF 12
QL 10 | 2 14 14 11 14 | 1
Pes 11 2 13 14 11 | | 10
3 12 Qh 14 13 12 a: 12
23 | 10 oR 14 Q 1] Q 14
Sept, 15....! 92 24 | a 13 34 13 14 13
23 12 94 13 2 11 | 2 13
23 10 24 14 14 13 | 3 14
24 11 | 2 13 2 13 3 13
2 13 | Q4 14 14 13 3 13
31 | 24| 13 || Sept. is...| 3 | 10 24 13
3t | 14) S 12 34 | 13 2 12
Q4 10 | 2 12 ot 15 | 23 12
Hee || UG) Q 13 Qt 12 1 11
2 8 2 13 3 13 13 12
3 13 | o4 13 2 16 24 13
Qh 15 | Q 13 14 15 2 13
24 13 | 2 12 3 13 13 14
lee U0N| a 223 laa 2 | 10 14 LB
Qh) 12) 2 | 13 3) 16 2 14
160 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
Texan cattle—Continued.
MALE,
wa Dn wn n
=| m [= mn a n a m
Date. = 5 Date. 2 5 Date. 3 5 Date. 3 3
a ei a B = z a =
mM =) M = nm 4 M 4
Sept. 18....| 24 TSA eSentael Game meee 12 || Sept. 24...| 2% 14 || Sept. 25...| 24 13
2 14 2 11 2 13 2 14
14 13 24 13 Qh 14 24 12
14 14 14 lL Qt 14 Q 13
Q 13 14 ll 2 13 Q 12
2 14 2 12 2 12 14 13
Qh 15} 2 12 Qt 14 1 9
2 13 14 12 OL 13 14 10
14 14 1 ll 2 14 ies 12
1 12 14 12 Qn 14 i 9
14 13 Q 13 Dy) 13 14 12
Q 11 14 11 3 15 2 13
Qh 13 14 11 Qh 14 Q 12
Q 13 Q 13 3 15 QL 14
2 11 2 TOD ESept25ees pees 10 Q 13
u 12 2 11 1 12 Qt 14
2 14 2 il 2 11 Q 13
14 13 Qh 12 2 13 14 10
2 14 2 13 2 15 14 11
2 13 Qu ll 2D 10 Q 12
Qh 12 at 13 Qh 13 4 11
2 13 14 y b) 13 14 10
14 ll 1 10 1 11 Qt 13
14 10 13 11 Q 12 Q 12
Q 13 14 9 2) 13 14 12
QL 14 14 12 Qh 13 2 13
Q 13 || Sept. 24...| 2% 14 Q 12 soa SS
Qt 13 2 13 14 Tl} Motalls eee. 1, 1093! 6, 070
2 12 2 14 1 10 | ——
2 11 2 15 24 13 || Average. -/2.259 | 12.36
Q ll 2 13 Q 12
FEMALE. |
Sept. 8....- Qh 11 || Sept. 8.--.| 23 15 || Sept. 8-..-| 3 ISESepeloee 3 13 |
Qt 10 3 12 || He eet 13 || Qh 12 |
2 10 Qt 16 | 23 16 eee
Q 12 2h 14 || Sept. 10-..| 2 Tiley] TS 558- 64 360 |
Qi| 12 2 15. || 14 9 | es
25 10 2h 13 2 10 Average . -|2. 387 | 12.415 |
2 10 3 16 2 10
2 1] Qh 15 | 14 10 |
3 13 QE 16 2 10 | |
MALE AND FEMALE. |
s
Sais Doaace 3 TQ HN Septs Qasee| boii lide Sept. 4ccse|heeoan | meleenl Sept nemo s| meee =18}
3 102 4 13 13 |] 13 3 14
3 gi 33 | 10 Q 15 Qh 13
4 12 381) a 2 12 Qh 12
3 11 34 9 2 13 Qh Til
3 10 31] 10 Qi | 15 2 10
oy | 12 3 104 3 12 Qt 13
3 12 3% | 11 3 ll Qt 12
3 11 3 10 3 12 Qh 13
3 114 3 10 3 10 Q 10
Qi} 10 32) 11 3 10 Qt 13
93 | 10 ot 9 3 12 Qt 14
Qa} 11 33 | 112 Qa 9 Qn 12
a] 11 Qn i) Q1 | 12 2 14
We Mo "Sept: 4-22.) ) 2 10 Q 13 Qh 13
i) 8 12 2 11 3 10 Qh. 12
34] 10 } 3 12 3 12 2 13
Spies lf ark 21] 10 2 12 Q 11
Shetty De esae 23 gt IE |} tl) Qe) 12 | Qt 14
3 104 o] 11 Q 10 2 13
Q4 | 11 ) 12 2 10 Qt 13
23 | 13 Qh] 16 2h) 12 Qt 13
3 12 2 14 24 | 12 Q 14
93 | J1 24 | 10 Q 12 Q 14
24 Sun 2 12 Qt} 14 Q 13 z
a
_SPLENIC OR PERIODIC FEVER OF CATTLE. 161
Texan cattle—Continued.
MALE AND FEMALE.
= 2 | S a
=| n a mn A mn =| a
Date. Ey 5 Date. «2 5 Date. 3 5 Date. 3 S
yh 2 a ei a Z 2B 2
mM =) RN 4 MD 4 va) =
Sept. 4..... ge 4) "Sept, 6s---i) 22] is) ||"Sept, Ge.—4| 1.8 133 All| Staiste Wasedl 8}
ai] 14 Qi] 13 34] 10 QL 13
Q 1l aL) 14 3 10 Qh 16
Qt) 14 ai} 13 3h 94 14 12
Qi] 14 a1] 13 4 10 Qh 10
2} 13 23] 14 34 | 11 3 12
Qi} 12 P) LD Septadeees| oes 94 Qt 13
211] 10 21 | 14 34 | 10 Q 13
at] IL Qt) 14 | 3 104 24 10
Qi] 14 2 12 4 9} at 12
Qi] 14 Qi | 14 4h 9f 2h 113
ai | 12 gi] 13 3 10 13 24
Qt | 10 1 | 14 oF | 1a 2 13
Qi) 12 2% | 15 23 9 || Sept..8....| 3 12
3+ | 13 21 | 13 Q 8h 34 iit
Qi] 13 Qt.) 14 3h 94 4 94
Qi} 14 - Ee ||. 1B} Qi | 14 3 OF
2) 13 23 | 14 Sept. 72...| 24] 14 Sept. 9....] 23 101
at] 13 a 13 Q 12 34 9
91] 12 Qi] 14 or 14 33 10
ai| 13 95°) 13 ai} 12 4 9h
21] 10 Qi} 14 Qk] 14 4h 11
21 | 10 24] 15 By || ie) 3t 11
al | 74 Q 12 2t | 13 || Sept. 11...) 3 9
a1} 13 Qi ]| 12 ) 9 Q3 84
Qi} 12 Qt | 13 23 | 10 1 14
Qt | 13 23 | 12 ON al} 33 10
Qi] 14 Be || als OFS 4 ll
ot] 13 Q 10 24 | 14 34 92
at | 12 2i| 12 3 13 3h 12
21] 13 23 | 10 4 15 34 9
palsy 3 103 | ar 14 34 11
Qi | 14 3%] 112 | Cra 3 10
ai | 13 Qt] 11g oF! 15 33 12
Q1| 14 1 4 10 ne! 3 8
ai| 14 Q gk | ai} 14 S| heen 9
2 10 2h Om ou} 14 ES
pee || ii 34 | 113 3 aa |eRotallesee 701 | 3,139
21! 13 23] 114 34] 14 =
oe) Ip) 3 i” | 25 | 13 Average. .|2. 675 | 11.98
Sept. 6-.... 23} 14 33] 12 Q1 | 14
Qi | i4 Qi} 12 2 11
GENERAL REMARKS ON THE CATTLE DISEASES
REPORTED ON,
BY JOHN GAMGEEH, M. D.
The diseases of cattle which form the subjects of the three reports
herewith published are typical of three distinct classes of disorders
which tend to the impoverishment of the farmer and the country at
large. .
The first and simplest inits origin and character is an enzootic or indigen-
ous affection, localized in corn-rearing States and districts, where, under
the influence of abundant moisture, and inattention to conditions which
prevent the propagation of parasitic plants on the farmer’s crops. a fungus
is formed which destroys the nutritive value of cornstalks and grain.
These become indigestible, induce impaction of the third stomach and
constipation, which speedily terminate in death. The malady is not pro-
pagated beyond the farm or stable where the diseased fodder is supplied
to stock.
The third is the American cattle plague of 1868, which, from an igno-
rance of its origin and nature, created serious loss, and, what is proba-
bly as bad, a panic that cannot readily be forgotten, on both sides of the
Atlantic. Its study has revealed characters hitherto unknown or unde-
scribed in relation to any disease of man or animals. The facts rendered
show that it is developed in the hotter parts of the United States bor-
dering on the Gulf coast where lands are rich, retentive, undrained, and
constitute the hotbeds of malarious or periodic diseases in the human
family. Unlike these, so far as present knowledge goes, it is capable of
propagation in an intensified form among cattle which feed on pas-
tures traversed, in any part of the country beyond the original centers
of development, by southern herds. It is not improbable that compara-
tive pathology may here shed light on the precise nature of remittent
and intermittent fevers in man; and the fact that these have not been
observed to extend by a form of contagion may be explained by the con-
ditions essential to the propagation of the bovine periodic fever. Large
masses of animals have to travel fresh from the breeding grounds of this
indigenous disease, and discharge large quantities of excrement on the
food which is the carrier of the morbid material into the systems of cat-
tle that are contaminated and die. It is true that anthrax, Siberian boil
plague, or carbuncular fevers generally, from a peculiar decomposition in
the liquids and tissues of the affected animals, are capable of being trans-
REMARKS ON THE CATTLE DISEASES, 163
ferred by its inoculation under favorable circumstances, to healthy people,
and indeed to all warm-blooded creatures; but there are indigenous mal-
adies, somewhat allied to the splenic fever of cattle, developed under like
conditions, and capable of moderate extension from the districts where
they originate spontaneously. But the cattle in the south are affected
with a malady that is not inoculable, that is not propagated by the bites
of insects and by the transference of decomposed or poisoned blood and
tissues into the structures of healthy men or animals, and manifests in its
method of propagation more of the features of cholera than of other prop-
erly recorded malady. Itdoesnot belong tothe group of epizooties proper,
or contagious diseases like pleuro-pneumonia, rinderpest, and the varied
forms of variola. It is not an infectious disease; and the single observa-
tion reported by the New York commissioners cannot outweigh the hun-
dreds we have observed and carefully traced, and which indicate that the
cattle are not discharging, by their breath or skin, into the air around
them, the principles capable of perpetuating the malady. The plagues
proper spread regardless of soil, climate, food, geological formation,
altitude, &e., wherever sick animals approach or touch healthy ones.
Splenic fever is not communicated by a cow to its calf, and is absolutely
stopped by a fence, unless some accident leads to the mingling together
of the southern animals with others they are capable of injuring. The
malady, engendered with peculiar virulence in western or eastern cattle,
is not, unless exceptionally—and no properly attested exception has
come to my knowledge—communicated by these to other amimals that
have not traversed the trails of Texan and other southern herds. It is a
modification, a poisoning of the food and possibly of the water tainted
by the manure of the southern cattle, whereby the malady is transmitted.
It is thus with human cholera. I do not wish it to be understood that
splenic fever is at all allied to cholera beyond the peculiar and ordinary
method of propagation from certain centers. We know nothing of
the spontaneous development of cholera and the centers whence it
springs. We can witness the independent and primary production of
the Texas or Florida fever by transporting western or eastern cattle to
the south, where, fed on the pastures apart from other animals, they con-
tract the disease and die.
Annually the Texan steers suffer, so far as my observations on cattle of
all ages go, from this same local influence, which, in their acclimatized
systems, does not usually lead to death. There is doubtless something
tangible and ponderable, which some future chemist may reveal, that ren-
ders the grasses, and maybe the waters, of the south so deleterious.
The disease, therefore, to which the third of the annexed reports refers,
is an indigenous or enzodtic malady, susceptible of moderate extension
by the manner in which the grasses of healthy regions are modified by
the manure scattered broadcast from the systems of southern herds. It
is not a contagious plague, and will probably cease when the agriculture
of the south is fairly and fully developed.
164 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
Not so with the destructive malady the lung plague, or epizodtic
pleuro-pneumonia, which is silently but seriously ravaging the Kastern
States. This affection constitutes the subject of my second report. Its
method of propagation, by diffusion through the air of a specific animal
poison or virus, offers an instructive contrast to the comparatively harm-
less disease of the south. The lung plague kills slowly and surely wher-
ever it penetrates, without regard to latitude, breeds, soils, conditions of
weather, or systems of cultivation. It can be stamped out; and its propa-
gation in a mild form may be resorted to for the protection of cattle that
have been suspected of entering an infected area. It attacks animals
but once in their lifetime, and presents all the characters of specific erup-
tive fevers, of which the human or ovine small-pox may be regarded
typical. ;
A few words may not be considered inappropriate as to the nature of
our investigations. They have extended over a period of ten months,
and in all parts of the United States except in the far west. The furthest
point west we have reached has been near the terminus of the Kan-
sas Pacific railroad, and southwest to Corpus Christi. The great object
in view has been to determine and demonstrate with precision the causes
and signs of the several diseases examined, with a view to the sugges-
tion of means of prevention and cure. The history of special outbreaks,
the methods of extension, the essential symptoms and _ pathological
changes indicated by sick animals, and the institution of careful per-
sonal inquiries among those who have witnessed the maladies at differ-
_ ent periods, have specially engaged our attention.
We were first in having opportunities for a eareful study of the changes
in temperature which occur in splenic fever, and, taken in conjunction
with similar observations originally made by us in relation to the rind-
erpest or Russian murrain, and since in numerous outbreaks of pleuro-
pneumonia, it will be found that very definite and highly practical re-
sults may be anticipated from persistence in this method of observation.
Indeed so important is the matter in connection with the entire subject
of comparative pathology, that it nay not be deemed inappropriate to
give a restuné of our operations on this particular point.
Last July we first used the only available thermometers that could be
obtained in Chicago, Centigrade thermometers, of French manufacture.
The Surgeon one however, kindly acceded to a request made through
the Department of ee and two carefully compared self-regis-
tering thermometers, made by Mr. L. Casella, of London, were forwarded
to the west for the purpose of our inquiries. With these we were ena-
bled to correct and verify the earlier observations. The normal tempera-
ture of cattle varies from 100° to 102° Fahrenheit. The average tem-
perature of Texan cattle is from one to two degrees higher than that of
northern steers. There may be accidental deviations, of which the most
noticeable is at the period of cestrum, when a cow may indicate a tem-
perature as high as 106° Fahrenheit. It is, however, remarkable how
REMARKS ON THE CATTLE DISEASES. 165
difficult it is in healthy animals to cause any great deviation from a nor-
mal standard, even during the hottest days of a western summer. Com-
parative observations on a number of animals at the same time consti-
tute a valuable and essential test. It was, however, striking and strange
that in examining Texan cattle caught with the lasso, the temperatures
obtained were the same as those among work cattle of the same herds,
and which could be handled readily near the wagons. Observations of
this kind are referred to in the report on splenic fever.
The best part—and only one which should be chosen—for the insertion of
the thermometer, is the rectum. The instrument must be introduced as
nearly as possible to the same extent in all cases, and retained in situ at
least three minutes. Animals are apt to defecate soon after the ther-
mometer is passed in, and the rectum then remains passive for a time.
This necessitates the withdrawal and reintroduction of the instrument,
and the time required for the observation must be taken from the see-
ond intromission.
By this means animals in apparent health, grazing and moving in
perfect comfort, are often found sick; and in the case of a contagious
disease like pleuro-pneumonia, this timely warning is of the highest
moment.
In relation, however, to the nature of a malady, much is taught us by
the thermometer. The periodic fever of southern cattle begins, like the
rinderpest, with an increased heat of the body. The local changes ap-
pear secondary to the general fever, though it is difficult to estimate the
time that elapses from the first exaltations of temperature to the local
manifestations. In pleuro-pneumonia it is probable, and indeed our
observations are almost conclusive on the point, that there is first a local
change and commencing deposit. A material grows and penetrates,
charged with and dependent on the presence of a specific poison, and
when it has sufficiently involved any important parts and become com-
plicated with ordinary inflammatory changes, the general fever sets in.
An elevated temperature is, however, observed in this disease long before
a farmer or dairyman suspects that an animal is affected. This is the
only way in which some latent cases of pleuro-pneumonia are recognized.
Scientific men have hitherto failed in tracing the distinctive charac-
ters of organic poisons which differed from each other, and only recog-
nized by the very different effects produced on the animal economy.
Some attack a single species of animal; others induce the same disease
in a number of species. The lung-plague poison induces its character-
istic effects on cattle; the poison of hydrophobia, most readily commu-
nicated among feline and carnivorous animals, is deadly to the omnivora
and vegetable feeders. Of the peculiar principles which tend to the
diffusion of those diseases which are known to us as indigenous in cer-
tain latitudes, and which we must distinguish at all times, in classifying
diseases, from the contagious maladies of no known primary source, we
have two equally remarkable instances in the splenic fever of the south,
166 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
and the charbon or anthrax of many parts of the world. The one passes
from cattle to cattle; the other is deadly to men, horses, dogs, pigs, and
other warm-biooded animals.
It is evident that principles which exert such a variety of definite in-
fluences must have fundamental characters to distinguish them—that
the virus of small-pox may some day be capable of distinction in its virus
form from the virus of rinderpest or the lung plague. 2
As far back as 1849, Mr. L. E. Plasse a veterinary surgeon at Niort,
Deux Sevres, in France, published a work, illustrated by tables and a
map, in which he announced the discovery of the causes of epizodties and
epidemics, with the distinguishing features of two forms of charbon or
anthrax, the one gangrenous and the other virulent.* It isa common error,
due mainly to the undetermined meaning of a much used medical term,
to regard epidemics and epizoodtics as typhoid fevers. Thus confounding
many maladies, M. Plasse, in vainglorious terms which characterize his
whole volume of near 500 pages, says: “Jai reconnu que les fievres
typhoides, qui, chez les animawur, sont semblables a celle de. Vhomme,
dépendent toujours W@une seule et méme cause: des champignons micros-
copiques introduits dans Véconomie animale par les aliments ; et je démon-
trerai clairement que toutes les causes qui ont été indiquées ne sont qwin-
directes et déterminantes ; qwelles sont le résultat de Verreur; et que la
vérituble cause est une et invariable.” M. Plasse was by no means the
first to point to the lower forms of vegetable life as causes of disease in
men and animals; but it would be au unprofitable task to enlarge on the
earlier hints in this great field of error and of mystery. Plasse has the
credit of first publishing a comprehensive volume on the subject; and in
his succinct exposé of the work before us, an exposé which he read
before the Institute of France on the 9th of October, 1848, he says:
“7 have had to substitute the general denomination of cryptogamy for
the various expressions applied to the diseases called typhoid, and I have
recognized four states of the cryptogamic maladies.
“ First state, eryptogamic incubation. The toxic principle here may
sojourn in the animal economy during a greater or less length of time,
without causing marked functional disturbance; the disease will never-
theless be recognized by certain general symptoms.
“Second state, cryptogamic elimination. This is the discharge of the
poisonous principle from the animal economy, without apparent fune-
tional trouble, whether by the excretions, the embryo in abortion, or the
sucking animal.
“Third state, external cryptogamy. The morbid principle is eliminated
without apparent disturbance, and is fixed in a more or less apparent
manner on the surface of the skin, or in certain cavities which have exter-
nal openings. In this category are included glanders, farcy scrofula,
lupus, canker of horses’ feet, (crapaud,) éléphantiasis, tinea, lepra, &e.
* Découverte des causes des Epizooties et des Epidémies; Causes et distinction de
deux genres de Charbon, &c. Par L. E. Plasse. Poitiers, 1849.
REMARKS ON THE CATTLE DISEASES. 167
Fourth state, cryptogamic fever. Here the toxic principle is precipita-
ted in the incubative stage, either in the liquids or in the solids, in the
interior, and in a manner whereby it determines a more or less intense
and very various reaction, according to the kind of fungus and the system
which is affected; thence the different forms of typhoid fevers, such as
epizootic aphthe, grippe, the contagious typhus of cattle, suette miliaire,
gangrenous pleuro-pneumonia, variola, scarlatina,” &e.
M. Plasse heralded forth his great discoveries in terms of no doubt-
ful meaning: ‘ C’est a la médicine vétérinaire qwil était réservé War-
river & ces grandes découvertes.”. It might be thought that he had
arrived at this result after long and painful researches on cryptogamic
botany, and demonstrating, the presence of the lower forms of plants in
the tissues of such animals, or in the food which communicated disease.
Suffice it to say that M. Plasse’s observations referred rather to the
character of seasons and localities remarkable for the development of
cryptogamic vegetation, and suppposed to induce epidemics and epi-
zootics. He has recorded some observations on intestinal disturbance,
induced by grasses and grains attacked by fungi which he does not
name; but, apart from these imperfect records, his entire work is based
on the crudest hypotheses.
It is not my object here to give a history of the cryptogamic theories
in relation to the origin of disease, nor to review the able work of
Charles Robin on the parisitie plants living on man and animals, nor
analyze the observations of Swayne, Brittain, Budd, Baly, Sull, Griffith,
Bennett, Robertson, Graves, Swain, Salisbury, Hallier, Richardson,
Duvaine, Du Bary, and many more. Apart from the views enunciated and
slender facts recorded, it seems to me essential to the completion of the
work undertaken to attempt some means whereby it might be shown
whether the periodic, or Texas, fever and the lung plague did owe their
origin, as alleged by the New York commissioners for the first, and Hal-
lies and Weiss for the second, to a peculiar cryptogamic vegetation.
When in the west last summer I had occasion to recommend an investi-
gation of the causes of the prevailing cattle fever in the South; and on
its being resolved that I should visit Texas for the purposes of this
inquiry, I obtained the assent of the Commissioner of Agriculture to the
selection of Mr. H. W. Ravenel, of Aiken, South Carolina, so well known
as an enthusiastic and reliable observer and collector in the field of
cryptogamic botany, to accompany me.
At the same time, Dr. J. S. Billings and Dr. E. Curtis, whose attention
has been specially directed to the eryptogamie origin of disease, offered
to co-operate with me, if I would supply material for satisfactory experi-
ments regarding the two diseases named. By a favorable arrangement
between the agricultural and army medical departments, these reports
are now enriched by observations of the most reliable and interesting
description.
REMARKS ON THE IXODES BOVIS.
BY C. V. RILEY, ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.
IXODES BOVIS, (RILEY.)
A reddish, coriaceous, flattened species, with the body oblong-oval
contracted just behind the middle, and with two longitudinal impres-
sions above this contraction, and three below it, more especially visible
in the dried specimen. Head short and broad, not spined behind,
with two deep, round pits. Palpi and beak together unusually short,
the palpi being slender. Labium short and broad, densely spined
beneath. Mandibles smooth above, with terminal hooks. Thoracic
shield distinct, one-third longer than wide, smooth and polished; convex,
with the lyrate medial convexity very distinct. Legs long and slender,
pale testaceous red; cox not spined. Length of body, .15 of an ineh;
width, .09 of an inch. Missouri Coll, C. V. Riley.
This is the cattle tick of the Western States.. Several hundred speci-
mens, in different stages of growth, have also been received from Pulvon,
west coast of Nicaragua, taken from the horned cattle, and on a species of
dasyprocta, by Mr. J. McNeil. They preserve the elongated flattened
form, with the body contracted behind the middle, by which this species
may be easily identified. The largest specimens measure .50 by .30 of an
inch. When gorged with blood they are nearly as thick through as they
are broad. In the freshly hatched hexapodous young, and the young in
the next stage of growth, the thoracic shield is one-third the size of
the whole body, which is pale yellowish, with very distinct crenulations
on the hinder edge. The fourth pair of legs are added apparently at the
first moult. It is called “garapata” by the inhabitants of Nicaragua.
LETTER FROM H. W. RAVENEL, ESQ.
To the Commissioner of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.:
Str: In accordance with an invitation to accompany Professor Gamgee
to Texas, and to make an examination of the botany of the country where
he investigated the cattle disease, and especially to direct attention to
the lower cryptogamic flora, the fungi, and algae, and also to examine
the grasses and other plants furnishing food for cattle, I reached Gal-
veston on the morning of the 28th of March, and proceeded at once to
Houston to join Professor Gamgee.
After making a cursory examination into the pastures in the neighbor-
hood of Houston, I accepted an invitation from Colonel Ashbell Smith
to visit his farm at Galveston Bay, Harris County, and reached that
place on the 30th. Here [ had an opportunity of seeing a variety of
soils, prairie as well as heavily timbered land, the latter rather rare
in this part of Texas. Colonel Smith offered me ample facilities for
investigation, and from his long residence in the country, and exten-
sive information, [ was enabled to derive much benefit. I spent five
days at this place, and made large collections of fungi and some few
grasses. I made.an examination also of hay which had been cut last
summer and stacked in the fields. It was perfectly sound, and of bright
and healthy color, without any indication of mouldiness or parasitic
growth. The hay was cut from a body of prairie land inclosed by a
fence, a portion of which had been burnt off for the purpose. The
remaining portion in the old dried grasses of the last season presented no
different appearance from dried grasses in similar situations; nothing to
indicate any increased growth of parasitic fungi, or of having suffered
from that cause. Colonel Smith was good enough to furnish me with
notes of his place, which I append, to give an idea of the quality and
situation of his lands:
‘The Evergreen estate is situated in the 29° 42’ north latitude, at the
head of Galveston Bay, within the debouchure of the united waters of
Buffalo Bayou and the San Jacinto River, over Clopper’s Bar, and on the
east side of the river. Itis washed inits rear by the Cedar Bayou, which
empties into Galveston Bay some two miles lower down. This bayou is
from twenty-five to thirty feet deep. There is scarcely any swamp or
bottom, properly so called. The geological formation is alluvial. The
soil on the San Jacinto or bay side is chiefly a sandy loam. That at the
Cedar Bayou is a very black, stiff soil, and commonly known in this State
as ‘hog wallow,’ from numerous depressions of the surface as if made
170 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
by the wallowing of hogs. The estate comprises about four thousand
acres, pretty equally divided in quantity into prairie and heavily tim-
bered land. Oak and-cedar are the prevailing timber. There are also
pines, hackberry, pecan, elm, ash, plum, persimmon, &c., &e. There
are four species of grapes, at least. The mustang and muscardine
abound in immense quantities. Both these vines, which are heavy bear-
ers, make an excellent wine. The grasses are numerous; those growing
spontaneously on the black lands, when protected from the bite of ani-
mals by inclosure, make an excellent hay. The adjacent waters modify
the temperature of the air most sensibly, both in summer and winter.
The winter cold is about 5° milder than that of Houston, as shown by a
comparison of thermometers. The fields when cultivated in corn, cotton,
and sugar cane, aS before the war, yield abundantly.”
After my return to Houston I went into the country, about three
miles from the town, to a farm-house on the Buffalo Bayou, where I
employed about two weeks in examining the pastures and grasses and
making collections of fungi and other eryptogams. The wooded
growth along the banks of the bayou, consisting of Magnolia, Laurus,,
Ilex, Ungnadia or Spanish buckeye, Pecan, Tilia, &c., &e., afford a fine
field for the fungi, and at this place I collected about two hundred dis-
tinct species. The pastures were quite green, but the grass still young
and searcely sufficiently grown to be identified. I collected here all
that were in flower and could be distinguished. My attention was
directed to their examination, especially to ascertain the presence of the
lower entophytal forms of fungi or alge. I found them remarkably free
of such parasites as I expected from the early period of the year, (the
Uredos, Ustilagos, Puccinias, Tilletia, and other entophytes most generally
appearing later in the season,) with the exception of a few species, and
they not in any abundance; and a Helminthosporium which infests the
same grass (Sporobolus Indicus) here in the Southern Atlantic States. I
found no fungus on the grasses or other cattle food to attract my notice.
This place, (Dr. Perl’s beef packery,) on the Buffalo Bayou, and Colonel
Smith’s farm, are both in Harris County. With very few exceptions my
entire collection of fungi, amounting to nearly three hundred species,
ras made at these two places; and it was also here that Professor Gam-
gee had the opportunity of examining some twenty-five or thirty cattle,
collected from the neighboring pastures and slaughtered at the packery.
On the 23d of April we left Houston by steamer, and reached Galves-
ton the next morning, and on the 26th took the steamer for Indianola,
where we arrived on the morning of the 27th. Finding a sail packet
ready to start for Corpus Christi, we took passage and reached the latter
place on the 29th. The next day we rode out into the country some
six or eight miles from the town, passing through the ‘“ chaparral” or
pastures densely set with cactus and various thorny shrubs. For several
miles above Corpus Christi we passed through the mixed growth of prairie
and chaparral. On the Nueces Bay, at the mouth of the river, the face of
FUNGI OF TEXAS. pyres |
the country was beautiful, with a gentle rolling surface some fifteen or
twenty feet above the waters of the bay, thickly covered with grasses
and flowering plants; and, interspersed with clumps of the graceful mes-
quite tree, (Algarobia glandulosa,) it presented the appearance of a well-
kept lawn. On these prairies the grasses were much further advanced
in growth than further north, and I added to my collection many I had
not previously seen, and especially one or two species of mesquite grass.
On our return to Indianola, about one hundred and ten miles north of
Corpus Christi, we went out some twelve or fifteen miles into the coun-
try—all prairie—and here I was also enabled to add largely to my col-
lection of grasses and other phaenogamous plants. I saw but few eryp-
togams either at Corpus Christi or Indianola, a few lichens and two or
three species of fungi comprising all from those localities. These prairie
grasses were as free of cryptogamic growth as those about Houston, and
although my attention was specially directed to them, I could see
nothing to excite suspicion as to their being differently affected from
grasses in other places. There were certainly no entophytal fungi infest-
ing them at that time in sufficient quantity to attract my notice.
The lands which I saw in Texas were all fertile, some of them ex-
tremely so. Most of the surface was of a fine clayey loam, in some
places rather tenacious. From this cause during a wet spring, as the
last one was, it was difficult to prepare for cultivation. I was informed
along the coast that the best pastures and the most nutritious grasses
were found higher up,,from fifty to sixty miles above, and there are the
best grazing lands.
About Houston the grasses are killed for a few months during winter,
but at Corpus Christi and along the southern coast they remain green
and furnish good pasture all the year round. I here present an analysis
of my collection of fungi according to their natural orders, and a com-
parison with those of Rev. Dr. Curtis’s North Carolina collection, the
only full catalogue published in the United States :
Orders. Texan. Fungi. N. Carolina. Fungi.
No. of species. Percentage. | No.of species. Percentage.
Hymenomycetes - ----. --.- 64 22 955 39
ASCOMVCeles! 2.2% 5225.8 151 52 715 34
Gasteromycetes --..-. ---- 13 4 150 6
Hyphomycetes. .... ..-..-. 26 9 188 8
Coniomycetes) - .-=; ..---- 28 9 341 14
My whole collection amounts to three hundred and fifteen numbers;
but deducting for species too old to be determined, and some represented
under other numbers, thirty, the whole number may be estimated at
about two hundred and eighty-five good species.
It will be seen by the above comparison that the Texan falls below the
v7T2 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE.
North Carolina collection in relation to numbers of Hymenomycetes, an
order which contains the Agarics, Boleti and other large and fleshy
species very difficult to preserve except in dry weather. The number,
however, which I saw were few, and I was impressed at the time with
the very few representatives of the order in Texas. Perhaps later in
the season that inequality would not have been observed. I was also
surprised to find comparatively so few of the Entophytal Coniomycetes
which infest living plants, the rusts, smuts, bunts, &c. This difference
would also probably be less at a later period of the season,:as it is mostly
towards autumn, when the seeds of grasses are maturing and the leaves
declining, that they are in the greatest profusion.
Attention has been drawn in the last few years to the “Texan cattle
disease,” and much interest has been elicited as to the nature and cause of
this disease. In the voluminous and very able “ Report of the New York
State commissioners in connection with the Metropolitan Board of Health
of New York City,” this subject has been very thoroughly investigated,
and one of the results which Seem to be definitely reached is the con-
stant and universal presence in the blood and bile of the diseased animals
of certain cryptogamic forms of vegetation (Micrococci and Cryptococei
so-called) primordial spores or cells, and which, under the skillful ma-
nipulation of Professor Hallier, of Jena, have developed themselves into
a distinct fungus plant which he names Coniothecium Stilesianum, after
the distinguished microscopist on the New York board,-who first discov-
ered them. Professor Hallier, in his letter of December 18, 1868, to Dr.
Harris, of the Metropolitan Board, says in regard to the plant: ‘ Perhaps
you may succeed in finding out the places where this Coniothecium grows
in nature. At all events, it is a parasitical fungus growing on plants,
and to be looked for in the food of the wild bullocks.”
Whether my examination of a limited portion of the flora of Texas,
and comprised in so short a time, will throw any light upon these inter-
esting questions, I cannot tell. My observations were made with as
much diligence and care as I could command, and present, as faithfully
as lam able to give them, the true condition of the pastures and the
cryptogamic vegetation of the region of country I visited. As far as I
was able to examine, I found no species of Coniothecium on pasture
grasses or on the dried hay. This, 1 know, is only negative evidence.
The spores of these minute fungi, when they exist, are generally in
great abundance, and may be wafted about by winds and carried by
rains into rivers and pools of surface water which the animals drink.
The modus operandi of these subtle agents of mischief, (semina mor-
borum,) and the manner in which they gain access to the animal system,
have long baffled the scrutiny of scientific men. To establish the fact of
direct agency in any of these forms of vegetation, and to trace satisfae-
torily the connection between cause and effect, will require cumulative
proof of very strong and unquestionable character. The phases through
which they pass, and the different forms they assume at various periods
FUNGI OF TEXAS. 3
of their growth, suggesting an analogy with the partheno-genesis (or
alternation of generations) in the animal kingdom, is another element of
difficulty in the solution of this question. Such investigations; however,
as those undertaken by the New York Commissioners conducted as they
have been in a truly scientific and philosophical spirit, must necessarily
result in throwing light upon the subject and be ultimately crowned with
SUCCESS.
My collection of phaenogamous plants comprises about one hundred
and seventy species. Of these about two-thirds consist of graminee
and cyperacee, comprising the grasses proper and the rushes, sedges,
and reeds, and water grasses. I am now engaged in their examination,
and will furnish to the Agricultural Department a full series. Besides
these, I collected such lichens and mosses as I could readily obtain,
specimens of which will also be prepared for the department.
Recapitulation of collection made in Texas.
Species.
Grasses and other phaenogamous plants, about...........-..-.--- 170
JEL CWT) 2h CU Sel a eel Pao ean oan Oa Secale ake Sea Ama eee tga Pe ae 285
DAM ee aU OU Ls yet, totes ts ata fae SUP ete 8 Re er See RETA sg 25
WEnSeiandeale patie abOutesst: Voie Oy one Tier Sd tue aI)
TETGATGIIS SPAT OU ele ats eg nO ae Oe RT Aa 85
NOURISH OCO) Th eS epee te oe PREM oe Seem, Mant ee Cee, eek Ae 600
Respectfully submitted :
; H. W. RAVENEL.
AIKEN, SOUTH CAROLINA, June 21, 1869.
REPORT OF RESULTS OF EXAMINATIONS OF FLUIDS OF DISEASED CATTLE
WITH REFERENCE TO PRESENCE OF CRYPTOGAMIC GROWTHS,
BY BREVET LIEUTENANT COLONEL J. S. BILLINGS, ASSISTANT SURGEON U. S. ARMY, AND
BREVET MAJOR EDWARD CURTIS, ASSISTANT SURGEON U.S. ARMY.
Tn accordance with the request of the Honorable Commissioner of Agri-
culture, and with instructions received from the Surgeon General United
States Army, to investigate the question of the possible cryptogamic
origin of cattle diseases, we have carefully examined many samples of
blood and secretions from diseased cattle, furnished us from time to time
by Professor Gamgee, and have experimented with them in various
ways. The results of our investigations we have to report as follows:
The questions which we have endeavored to answer are these:
1st. Are any forms of cryptogamic growth present during life in the
blood or secretions of the diseased animals ?
2d. If so, of what character are they, and what is their probable source?
Supposing the above queries answered, there would still remain the
problem of the nature of the connection between the eryptogam and the
disease, a problem which we have not attempted to discuss.
As the fungi are the only eryptogams which it is necessary to con-
sider, reference will be made to these only.
The fungi which are supposed to cause disease in animals are, when
in their perfect state, or at least in such a state that they can be identi-
fied, composed of mycelium and spores. But according to the advocates
of the cryptogamic origin of disease, neither the mycelium nor the spores
of the fungus that produces the malady are necessarily or even usually to
be found in the fluids or tissues of the affected animal, their theory being
that the disease is produced by the presence in the economy of minute
particles of protoplasm, (micrococcus of Hallier,) resulting from develop-
ment and breaking up of the spores or mycelium of a fungus; from which
granules, they assert, can be developed perfect forms of fungi, of recog-
nizable genera and species, by proper ‘‘ cultivation” outside of the body of
the animal fluids containing them.
Thus, when the blood of a pleuro-pneumonie cow fresh from the vein
is examined with a magnifying power of 1,200 diameters linear, nothing
distinctive or unusual may appear; the red and white blood corpuscles
may be perfectly normal, and nothing like spores or mycelium will be
seen. But there will probably be, either single or in masses, some minute
granules or molecules appearing as glistening points scattered over the
field. If such are not present at first, by keeping the blood exposed to
the air for a few hours they may be found in abundance.
Now it is these little molecules which are asserted to cause disease by
their presence in the animal economy, and which are claimed to be vege-
INVESTIGATION AS TO ORIGIN OF CATTLE DISEASES. DTS
table in their nature, as being developed from and capable of reproduc-
ing certain common fungi, popularly known as rusts, smuts, or molds.
To prove the truth of the latter statement, experiments have been
made by various investigators on the principle of placing the fluids con-
taining the mierococcus in the proper conditions as regards warmth and
moisture for the development of fungi; supplying the germs with suita-
ble pabulum for their nourishment, and adopting such precautions as
are possible against the fortuitous introduction of spores of fungi from
the atmosphere. And if under such circumstances a mold or mildew
appears upon the suspected matter, the argument is that such mold
necessarily sprang from the micrococcus granules as its parent germs,
and therefore represents the perfect fungus of which such microcoecus
is a special form.
Now, since the spores of the common molds are almost omnipresent,
the conclusiveness of all such experiments must depend upon the possi-
bility of showing that all extraneous bodies have been perfectly excluded
from the fluids cultivated.
In detailing our own experiments in this direction, therefore, we give
a somewhat minute description of the apparatus and processes employed ;
partly that the value of the results obtained may be judged by it, and
in part because it may be of use to others attempting a similar line of
research.
The first thing to be done is to obtain the suspected fluids in a state
of purity, without risk of contamination by spores floating in the
atmosphere, and in such a manner that they can be preserved for some-
time without risk of material change.
To effect this we take a glass tube three-sixteenths of an inch or so in
diameter, seal one end by the flame of a lamp, and, at a point about three
inches from the sealed end, draw it out to a slender tube. (Fig. 14—