! ! r IV. OF : i|:RARY REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION By W. E. CASTLE EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE By C. C. LITTLE \Vc 1 WASHINGTON, D. C. Published by the Carnegie Institution of Washington 1913 CD 2? Caknegie Institution of Washington. Publication No. 179. Papi'.ks \tos. 18 axd 19 of the Station for Experimental Evolution at Cold Spring Earbor, New York. Copies of this Bool* were first issued SEP 131913 n PRESS OF GIBSON BROTHERS WASHINGTON, D. C. REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION. By W. E. CASTLE, Professor of Zoology in Harvard University, /,' search Associate of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. Paper No. IS, Station for Experimental Evolution at Cold Spring Harbor. N v: York. % REVERSION IN GUINEA-PKiS AND ITS EXPLANATION. In 1905 I showed that when black-coated guinea-pigs of pure race are mated with red-coated ones only black-coated young are ordinarily produced, and that if such young are in turn mated with reds, both black young and red ones are obtained. In other words, black is a mendelian dominant to red. The fact was, however, noted that occasionally the cross of black with red causes reversion to the agouti or wild type. But this may be regarded as a modified condition of black, since the hairs of the agouti animal contain black pigment, but disposed in a definite pattern with red, the entire hair being black except a terminal or subterminal band of red (or yellow) . An examination of the tables of matings published at that time shows that all the agouti animals so produced were the progeny of a single red animal, 6^2054. This animal produced black young as well as agouti ones in crosses with black, so it was not clear to what the reversion was due. By a study of the progeny of this animal the matter was later cleared up. The black young were found never to produce agouti young in crosses with any red animals unless such reds were descended from c? 2054. The agoutis, however, produced a mixture of agoutis, blacks, and reds, when mated with ordinary red animals. These and other corroborating experiments, reported briefly in 1907, showed that the agouti reversion in crosses of black with red is due to a factor transmitted by the red parent, never by the black one. For, as I then showed : (1) a red animal which produces the reversion to agouti in crosses with one black animal will produce it in crosses with any black animal; but (2) no black animal will produce agouti young unless crossed with a red animal which also produces agouti young in crosses with other black animals. For simplicity, the something possessed by red animals which induces reversion, I have called the agouti or A factor. It is invisible in the red animal, since the hairs of such animals are red throughout their length. Its only dis- coverable function is to exclude black from the terminal portion of the hair, and this function plainly can not be exercised unless black pigment is present. Now this agouti factor is transmitted like any other simple independent men- delian factor. Some reds are homozygous in A and so transmit it in all their gametes. A very fine female of this sort, kindly loaned me in the summer of 1906 by Mr. B. B. Horton, was mated with two different black males (d"44.~)i> and cf9538), by each of which she bore five young, all agouti-marked. These same males when mated to other red females produced only black young. Most of the agouti-producing reds which I have had, including the original c? 2054 (received in June, 1903) and some of his descendants, have been hetero- zygous in the agouti factor, so that when mated with black animals they pro- duced in approximately equal numbers agouti young and black ones. All 3 4 REVERSION IX ClINKA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION. reds which I have had, derived from otht r sources than these two, have failed to produce agouti young in crosses with black animals; see the summary in table 1. p. S. They may therefore be considered to lack altogether the agouti factor in which wild species of cavy are regularly homozygous. The agouti factor is transmitted through albinos exactly as are other color factors. Accordingly an albino may or may not possess and transmit the agouti factor; if it does possess this factor, it will produce agouti offspring when crossed with a black animal. Several examples of this have been ob- served among the albino descendants of c? 2054. Thus red c?3496, table 1, which when mated with heterozj'gous black females produced red young and black ones but no agoutis, when later mated with the albino females 4270 and 4262 produced 4 red and 4 agouti young. The father of these albinos, it should be said, was an agouti animal. Agouti animals produced by crossing black with red do not breed true. They produce three classes of young if bred with each other or with ordinary reds. The latter form of test has been more commonly employed in my experi- ments because I had more red animals than agoutis and it was easier to ascer- l ain their gametic composition. Fourteen young, however, were obtained from the mating of F\ agoutis inter se; they were 2 red, 2 black, and 10 agouti; see table 2, p. 9. The mating with reds produced 111 red, 45 black, and 40 agouti ; expected, 98 : 49 : 49. This expectation is calculated as follows: It is expected that half the young will be red because the agouti parent is known to be hetero- zygous for red. It is also expected that half the young will receive the agouti character, which those possessing black pigment will show7, but which those possessing only red pigment will not show. Hence all the reds should look alike, but half the others should be agouti. In the mating inter se of agoutis of this generation the expectation is 4 red : 3 black : 9 agouti ; the observed numbers, as stated, are 2 : 2 : 10, in a slightly smaller total, 14. The tests summarized above relate to five different Fx reversionary agouti males. Three of them were descendants of my original red male, 2054; the other two (9150 and 9152) were sons of Horton's red female. All gave similar results. Agouti young produced by the mating already described of an Fi rever- sionary agouti with an ordinary red produced the same kinds of young as did the I'\ agoutis, viz, red, black, and agouti; see the second division of table 2. The tests applied in this case were identical in character with those applied to the previous generation, viz, matings inter se and with ordinary reds (lacking A). Twenty-four different male animals were tested in one or both of these ways, while several females were tested in the first-mentioned way. The data for these are recorded for convenience in connection with the male involved in the same experiment. Only two of the various animals tested failed to pro- duce all three classes of young. In the case of these two, 9602 and 9685, there can be little doubt that a more extended test would have produced the missing class. Male 9602 produced 2 black young and 1 agouti. A further test would almost certainly have given red young, since his mother was red. Male 9685 produced 4 red young and 2 black ones. That he could also have produced REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION. 5 agouti young can scarcely be questioned, since he was himself an agouti. The total progeny of the 24 males by red females is 133 red, 66 black, and 69 agouti, the expectation being 134 : 67 : 07. By agouti mates they produced 25 red, 21 black, and 63 agouti young, the expectation being 27 : 21 : 61. These are remarkably close agreements. One of the 24 males, 7932, was also mated with a black female, producing 2 black and 2 agouti young, the expected equalit}r; no red young were to be expected. Agouti animals produced by mating agouti animals inter se are not so uniform in behavior as those thus far discussed. Experiment shows that they fall into four groups: I. Agoutis producing red, black, and agouti young. II. Agoutis producing only red and agouti young. III. Agoutis producing only black young and agouti young. IV. Agoutis producing only agouti young. Group I is represented by nine agouti males, whose parents were both agoutis; they were enumerated in the third division of table 2. Together they have produced (a) by red mates, 34 red, 20 black, and 19 agouti young; expected 36 : 18 : 18; (b) by agouti mates, 3 red, 5 black, and 14 agouti young; expected 5 : 4 : 12, if the females were of the same character as the males, as most of them doubtless were; (c) by black mates, 3 black and 3 agouti young, the ex- pected equality, no reds being expected. Group II is represented by the ten animals enumerated in table 3. They proved to be incapable of producing black young in any sort of mating. Mani- festly they were homogyzous in agouti. By red mates they produced 53 red and 52 agouti young. They were accordingly heterozygous in red, and equality of red and agouti young was to be expected. By agouti mates they produced 13 red and 62 agouti young. The expectation in this case varies with the character of the agouti mate employed, which was not in every case definitely determined. If the agouti mate belongs in Group I or II, then the expec- tation is 1 red : 3 agouti; but if the mate belongs in Group III or IV, the expectation is all agouti young. If the mates are a mixture of the two sorts, as a random group of F2 agoutis should be, then the expectation lies between 75 and 100 per cent agoutis; the percentage obtained is 82.66. By black mates, the Group II agoutis produced 18 young, all agouti, as expected. These were sired by two animals, both of which by red mates had produced red young as well as agouti young. Group III is represented by the 16 tested animals enumerated in table 4. They were incapable of producing red young, and hence were homozygous in black. But since they produced black young as well as agouti, it is evident that they were not homozygous in agouti. Three females (374,437, and 462) are included only provisionally in this group, since they were not tested by matings with red animals, but only with black ones. They are known to have produced black young, but it is not certain that they could not also have pro- duced red young, in which case they would fall in Group I. The test in the case of several other animals (as 5, 68, and 314) rests upon too small numbers 6 REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION. to be conclusive, but suffices to show that the animals in question were not in all respects homozygous, the condition it was desired to obtain in the experi- ment. These animals were therefore promptly discarded as soon as evidence was obtained that they produced other than agouti young. In the case of animals 191, C197, 7894, 8020, and 9939, the numbers of young are sufficiently large to establish beyond question their position in Group III. The animals included in table 4 together have produced by red mates 51 black and 91 agouti young. If all the red mates used lacked the agouti factor, we should expect equality of black and agouti young; but from this expecta- tion we observe a considerable divergence. It is quite possible that in some of these tests red animals were used which were descended from c?2054 and had inherited from him an unseen agouti factor, for in making the later tests some such animals were employed, but it is doubtful whether this accounts for the whole discrepancy, amounting to about 14 per cent. This doubt is strengthened by the similar discrepancy observed in the tests with black mates, where we expect equality of black and agouti, but obtain 5 and 12 respectively. The case of animal 191 looks suspicious; he produced only one black young one in a total of 22, yet the record is certainly accurate. We had provisionally pro- nounced him a pure agouti, when the single black young one came which places him in Group III. It seems doubtful wrhether the theoretical 50 per cent of his gametes were entirely free from the agouti character. If so, such gametes would seem to have been deficient in vitality. The deviation is, however, not an impossible chance result, though it seems improbable. I regret that this animal was not more extensively tested. The matings of animals of Group III with other agouti animals produced 9 black and 46 agouti young, or 84 per cent agouti, where we expect between 75 and 100 per cent. Agouti animals of Group IV are included in table 5. They represent the "fully fixed" agouti type breeding exactly like a pure wild species as regards color. Two thoroughly tested animals belong here beyond question, cf 145 and d"316; two others less fully tested belong here in all probability, viz. cT 160 and cf 181, while 9 473 is included as a possibly pure animal. She was fully tested qualitatively (by a mating writh a brown-eyed yellow animal known to lack both black and agouti), but the number of young obtained is not large enough to make the test conclusive. Similar tests of other females might be included in the table, but they would add nothing to the demonstrative case of cf 145, which shows that the reversionary character obtained by crossing can be obtained in a homozygous, pure condition, as it occurs in wild species. The five animals enumerated in table 5 have produced only agouti young: (a) by red mates, 52; (6) by agouti mates, 135; (c) by black mates, 26. The occurrence of four different types of F« agoutis indicates that the F\ agoutis, their parents, were heterozygous as regards two independent mendelian unit-characters, in agreement with the interpretation already given. These two characters are: (1) black-pigmented fur; (2) the agouti pattern (visible only in black-pigmented animals). Designating these two units as B and A respectively, the I-\ agoutis are all of the formula AB (heterozygous in both REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION. units). Their gametes are AB, A, B, 0. If an animal producing such gametes is mated with a red animal lacking both units, the zygotes formed would be, as regards these units, AB, A, B, and 0, or agouti, red, black and red respec- tively, or collectively 2 reds : 1 black : 1 agouti, as obtained (table 2). Further, such agoutis as came from this cross would be identical in character with the Fi agoutis. This expectation is confirmed by table 2, second division. But if the Fi agoutis are mated inter se, then we expect to get zygotes corresponding with the product of two sets of gametes, each AB +A +B +0, that is A2B2* + 2A2B + 2AB2 +4AB +2A +2B + A2 +B2 +0. In appearance these zygotes would fall into three classes, agouti, black, and red, as shown in the accompanying table. The agoutis in this (F2) generation, it will be noticed, should be of four different types, as actually observed. The AB group should produce all three sorts of young, agouti, black, and red, being heterozygous in both characters, A and B. The group designated by A2B would be pure for A but heterozygous for B. All their young would be potentially agoutis, but since part of them would lack black pigment, such would be red. Hence they would produce only the two sorts of young, agouti and red; see table 3. The group designated by AB2 would transmit black pigment to all their young, but only part of these would receive A . Hence they would produce agouti young and black ones, but no reds; compare table 4. The group A2B2 would transmit both black and agouti to all their young; hence they would produce nothing but agouti young, however mated; com- pare table 5. The expected proportions of these four groups of agouti animals are obviously 4:2:2:1. The numbers shown in the tables are 9 : 10 : 16 : 5. The apparent deficiency of individuals in Group I and excess in Groups II and III is readily accounted for. Not all the agoutis recorded as derived from an agouti X agouti cross were second-generation agoutis; many of them were ^'re- generation agoutis, having been obtained from two successive matings of agouti with agouti. In that case one or both of their parents may have been of Groups II or III, in which case the expectation for young of those groups is increased, while that for Group I is correspondingly diminished. Therefore both the kinds of agoutis obtained in the experiment and their numerical pro- portions are in harmony with the hypothesis presented in this paper. Agouti. Black. Red. 4 45 2A2B 2AB2 2B B3 2A A, 0 A2B2 9 3 4 ♦The subscript 2 is used (instead of the algebraic exponent 2) to indicate double rep- resentation of a factor, i. e., a homozygous condition as regards it. (See Castle, 1909.) 8 REVERSION IN CUINEA-PICS AND ITS EXPLANATION, SUMMARY. 1. The agouti coat characteristic of wild cavies and of most other wild rodents is dependent upon the presence in the fur of black pigment disposed in a definite pattern with red (or yellow). 2. The factors which control, respectively, the development of black pig- ment and the production of the agouti pattern are independent of each other. 3. The agouti coat is obtained only when both these factors are possessed by an individual. 4. Only such agouti individuals as are homozygous in both factors breed true under all circumstances. 5. An agouti animal which is homozygous in A (the agouti factor), but heterozygous in B (black pigmentation), may produce agouti young and red ones, but not black. 6. An agouti animal which is homozygous in B but heterozygous in A may produce agouti young and black ones, but not red. 7. An agouti animal heterozygous in both A and B may produce three sorts of young, agouti, red, and black. All Fi (reversionary) agoutis produced by crossing black with red are of this sort. Agoutis of the other three sorts are obtained only in the second or later generations of agouti young. BIBLIOGRAPHY. Castle, W. E., 1905. Heredity of coat-characters in guinea-pigs and rabbits. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication No. 23. 1907. On a case of reversion induced by cross-breeding and its fixation. Science, N. S., vol. 25, p. 151. 1907a. The production and fixation of new breeds. Proc. Am. Breeders' Associ- ation, vol. 3, p. 34. Table 1. — Differences among red guinea-pigs as regards the trans?nission of agouti Young by red mates. Young by heterozygous Hack mates. Young by homozygous black mates. Young by agouti mates. R B Ay R B Ag R B Ag R B Ag I. Homozygous in A . 9 Horton's red 0 0 0 3 10 1 II. Heterozygous in .1 . 2054.. 10 0 0 3 2 10 IS 20 lit 1 0 5 8 2 1 6 f) 0 1 9 9127S, daughter of c?2054.... 91280, 91281, daughters of c?2054 III. Lacking .1 . c?9347 c?2004 11 cT3496 0 0 12 0 17 0 REVERSION IN GUINEA-1MCS AND ITS EXPLANATION. 9 Table 2. — Agouti parents producing red young, black young, and agouti young. Young 1 red moth >y 'IS. Young bj agouti mothers. ^ oung by black mothers. It B Ag R B Ag H H Ag From red X black cioss: cf 1178 39 In 16 7 2 7 s d*3019 28 17 d*4812 'i 21 14 1 8 '■'• o*9150 2 2 10 0*9152 Totals From red X agouti cross: d"2797 0*2944 .. 111 1 45 4(1 11 2 2 li) 13 6 9 7 14 d*3982 c?4881 d*4882 d*4935 0*7916 c*7932 c?7978 o*7979 o"9190 7 6 1 2 8 1 2 11 6 7 1 3 13 2 5 6 5 2 7 0 4 5 4 6 2 3 4 2 4 3 2 3 16 :::::!::::: 0 2 2 8 5 4 5 17 c*9Ml 7 4 2 1 1 3 1 d*9528 3 7 (1 5 3 2 4 2 2 1 o*9583 d*9602 d*9620 o*9657 o*96S4 0 3 9 0*9685 d*9687 0*9698 0*9747 Totals From agouti X agouti cross: 0*59 0*179 o*318 d*6220 o*9258 d*9259 d*9411 d*9753 o*9993 Grand totals 4 j 2 4 1 9 6 2 1 3 6 2 0 3 5 1 2 0 0 2 0 1 2 133 66 69 25 21 63 ii 2 2 3 2 3 5 \ 3 1 0 3 1 4 2 1 0 0 9 3 2 1 0 0 1 o 2 1 1 I 4 4 1" 1 o 6 9 1 1 2 S 8 2 5 1 34 ! 20 19 3 : 5 14 0 I 3 i 3 278 131 128 30 ' 28 87 0 5 5 Table 3. — Agouti parents producing only red young and agouti young. Young by red mates. Young by agouti mates. Young by black mates. R B 1 Ag R B j Ag R B Ag From agouti X agouti cross: o*26 4 2 4 5 5 1 2 17 7 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2 4 0 3 1 2 18 6 6 2 0 0 0 (1 0 14 5 3 0 0 15 d*31.. d*137... 0*147.... I) 3 d*180... 1 0 5 ,r:j.(i'i o*429... d*6219... 5 5 0 0 18 17 d*7887... o*7926... Totals 53 o : 52 13 0 j 62 0 0 18 10 REVERSION IN GUINEA-PIGS AND ITS EXPLANATION, Table 4. — Agouti parents producing only black young and agouti young. Young by red mates. Young by agouti mates. Young by black mates. R B Ag R B Ag R B Ag From agouti X agouti cross: ilute brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown agouti 65 Dilute brown agouti x brown 65 VII. Pink-i yed brown agouti (fig. 7) 65 Pink-eyed brown agouti x pink-eyed brown agouti 65 Pink-eyed brown agouti x brown 66 VIII. Pink-i yed dilute brown agouti (fig. 8) 66 I'ink-eyed dilute brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown agouti 66 Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti X dilute brown 66 IX. Black (fig. 9) 67 Black x black 67 Black x dilute black 68 Black x pink-eyed black 69 Black x brown 69 Black x pink-eyed brown 70 Black x pink-eyed dilute brown 70 X. Dilute black (fig. 10) 70 Dilute black x dilute black 70 Dilute black x pink-eyed black 71 Dilute black x brown 71 Dilute black x pink-eyed brown 72 XI. Pink-eyed black (fig. 11) 72 Pink-eyed black x pink-eyed black 72 Pink-eyed black x brown 72 Pink-eyed black x dilute brown 73 Pink-eyed black x pink-eyed brown 74 XII. Pink-eyed dilute black (fig. 12) 74 Pink-eyed dilute black x brown 74 Pink-eyed dilute black x dilute brown 74 XIII. Brown (fig. 13) 75 Brown x brown 75 Brown x pink-eyed brown 76 Brown x pink-eyed dilute brown 76 XIV. Dilute brown (fig. 14) 76 Dilute brown x pink-eyed brown 76 XV. Pink-i !/< d brown (fig. 15) 77 Pink-eyed brown x pink-eyed brown 77 I'ink-eyed brown x albino >~ XVI. Pink-eyed dilute brown (fig. 10) 77 Restricted Series 78 (a) Dark-eyed intense series 78 \ VII. I 'lack-eyed yellow carrying agouti 78 XVIII. Black-eyed yellow without agouti (fig. 17) 78 XIX. Brown-eyed yellow carrying agouti 78 XX. Brown-eyed yellow without agouti (fig. 18) 78 CONTENTS. 15 Restricted Series — Continued. page. (b) Pink-eyed intense series 7S XXI. Pink-eyed yellow carrying black agouti 7s XXII. Pink-eyed yellow carrying black 7s XXIII. Pink-eyed yellow currying brown agouti 78 XXIV. Pink-eyed yellow carrying brown 7s (c) Dark-eyed dilute scries 7s XXV. Black-eyed dilute yellow carrying agouti 7H XXVI. Black-eyed dilute yellow without agouti 7*^ XXVII. Brown-eyed dilute yellow carrying agouti 78 XXVIII. Brown-eyed dilute yellow without agouti (fig. 19) 78 (d) Pink-eyed dilute scries 78 XXIX. Pink-eyed dilute yellow carrying black agouti 7n XXX. Pink-eyed dilute yellow carrying black 78 XXXI. Pink-eyed dilute yellow carrying brown agouti 78 XXXII. Pink-eyed dilute yellow carrying brown 78 Yellow X yellow, giving only dark-eyed intense young 80 Sooty yellow x sooty yellow, giving only dark-eyed intense young. ... 81 Cream x cream, giving only dark-eyed intense young 81 Yellow x cream, giving only dark-eyed intense young 82 Yellow x yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young 82 Yellow x yellow, giving intense dark-eyed and intense pink-eyed young 83 Sooty yellow X yellow, giving intense dark-eyed and intense pink-eyed young 83 Yellow x yellow, giving intense and dilute, dark-eyed and pink-eyed young st Yellow x yellow, miscellaneous si Yellow x dilute yellow, giving only intense dark-eyed young 84 Yellow x dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. ... 84 Yellow x dilute yellow, giving only intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young s t Yellow x dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink- eyed young 85 Yellow x dilute sooty yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young 85 Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving only intense dark-eyed young 85 Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young . 85 Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense pink-eyed and dark-eyed young 85 Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young 86 Cream x pink-eyed yellow, giving only dark-eyed intense young 86 Yellow x black agouti, giving only dark-eyed intense young 87 Yellow x black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. . . . Yellow x black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink- eyed young 87 Cream x black agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young s~ Yellow x dilute black agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young ss Yellow x dilute black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young 88 Cream x dilute black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark -eyed young 88 Sooty yellow x dilute black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed and pink- eyed young sS Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young . ss Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young 10 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Pkstricted Series — Continued. page (d) Pink-eyed dilute series — Continued. Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving intense and dilute, dark-eyed and pink-eyed young 89 Yellow x black, giving only intense dark-eyed young 89 Yellow x black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young 91 Yellow X black, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young 91 Cream x black, giving only intense dark-eyed young 92 Cream x dilute black, giving only intense dark-eyed young 92 Yellow x dilute black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. ... 92 Yellow x pink-eyed black, giving only intense dark-eyed young 92 Yellow x pink-eyed black, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young 92 Cream x pink-eyed black, giving only intense dark-eyed j'oung 93 Yellow x brown agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young 93 Yellow x brown agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. . . 94 Dilute yellow x dilute yellow, giving only dilute dark-eyed young. ... 95 Dilute yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young 95 Dilute yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young 95 Dilute yellow x pink-eyed dilute yellow, giving only dilute dark-eyed young 96 Dilute yellow x wild black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed young. . . 96 Dilute yellow x dilute black agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed young ... 96 Dilute yellow x dilute brown agouti, giving only dilute dark-eyed young 96 Dilute sooty yellow x dilute brown agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young 97 Pink-e3red yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving only intense pink-eyed young 97 Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute pink- eyed young 97 Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute pink-eyed young 97 Pink-eyed yellow x black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed and pink- eyed young 98 Pink-eyed yellow x dilute black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young 98 Pink-eyed yellow X brown, giving intense dark-eyed young 98 Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving only intense pink- eyed young 98 Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed brown agouti, giving only intense pink- eyed young 98 Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed black, giving only intense pink-eyed young 99 Pink-eyed dilute yellow x dilute black agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed and dilute pink-eyed jroung 99 Pink-eyed dilute yellow x black, giving intense and dilute, dark-eyed and pink-eyed young 99 Albinos x pink-eyed brown 100 Albinos x pink-eyed dilute brown 100 Bibliography 101 EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. PART 1. THE FACTORS PRODUCING COLOR IN MICE. In the coat of the common house mouse (Mus musculus) three pigments are recognizable, yellow, brown, and black. No connecting intergradations of color between these three types are visible. The inheritance of these colors and of their distribution, both qualitatively and quantitatively, has been the object of many investigations and is the principal feature of the present paper. All mammalian color has been found due to melanin pigment. Riddle (1909) has discussed the process of the formation of melanin pigment and states that all chemical evidence supports the idea that melanin pigment is the product of an oxidation process. The substances (chromogens) on which the oxidizing agents (enzymes) act were found to be ty rosin and certain related aromatic compounds. It has been further shown that tyrosinase-like ferments, which occur widely distributed in the organism, act as oxidizing agents, thus producing melanin compounds. Furthermore, it has been proved that at least artificial melanins may pass through a series of colors before arriving at the final stage of oxidation. In such series the earlier stages of oxidation give lighter colors than the later ones. Cuenot (1903) advanced an hypothesis to explain the formation of color by the interaction of a chromogen substance and an enzyme. He called the chromogen the general factor for the production of color, C, and supposed that in albinos this chromogen substance is lacking, thus making it impossible for color to be formed. Riddle, however, states that the nature of the chromogen, it being very widely distributed throughout the organism, is such that any theory postulating the absence of this substance would be chemically absurd. Gortner (1912), however, finds evidence that chromogens in insects may be of restricted distribution, thus forming color patterns. At present it is impossible to decide finally between the explanation offered by Cuenot and that suggested by Riddle. We shall have to await further chemical evidence to determine whether the albino does or does not lack the oxidizable substance or substances necessary for pigment production.* If we assume that there is only one enzyme present to act as an oxidizing agent, we must assume for it as many different degrees of activity as are re- quired to explain the occurrence of the various colors known to mendelize (three in mice, yellow, brown, and black) . If we assume that a different enzyme or *A recent paper by Keeble and Armstrong (1912) has shown that in Primula sinensis lack of chromogen seems to be the cause of albinism, thus favoring the original hypothesis of Cuenot. 17 18 THE INHERITANCE <>F COLOR IN MICE. group of enzymes is responsible for the production of each pigment we must suppose that in mice at least three such enzymes or groups of enzymes exist. T<> det ermine which of these conditions occurs in mice is not a problem for the biologist, but for the chemist. The biologist must confine his attention to determining the number of distinct agencies at work in pigment formation irrespective of their chemical nature. These agencies, because of their physio- logical behavior, the biologist chooses to call "factors," and attempts to learn what he can about their functions in the evolution of color varieties. FORMATIVE AND DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. As has already been stated, three pigments (yellow, brown, and black) are observable in mice. Yellow has been found, by Riddle, to be the lowest in the scale of mammalian pigments. Nevertheless, in mice no case has been recorded where yellow alone is present. The eye always has, in addition, brown or black pigment granules, while in many cases both are present. The same fact holds good for the coat, so far as observation goes. These three pigments — yellow, brown, and black — are, however, discon- tinuous stages. If they are not the products of distinct enzymes they are the result of distinct grades of activity of a single enzyme. Which of these conditions holds makes no difference at present, so we may, for purposes of discussion, refer their causation to three distinct factors, Y for yellow, Br for brown, and 11 for black. Certain animals possess yellow and brown pigment to the exclusion of black. In such animals, with no evidence of variation in the total amount of pigmentation, there occur varieties in which the proportion of brown to yel- low in the coat varies greatly. As the brown increases in amount the yellow decreases. It is fair, then, to assume that something is acting to convert the lower-grade pigment (yellow) into the higher grade (brown) . This, we suppose, is the factor Br already mentioned. The activity of such a factor may, however, be affected by other factors which determine the amount of brown formed and its location. Experiment shows that these assumed factors governing the development of brown are independent of the brown-forming factor Br, for they can be transferred without visible alteration to animals with black, andvice versa. Such factors we may call distributive. Black is the highest grade of mammalian pigment and doubtless, as Riddle states, is a higher oxidation stage of brown; for brown pigment is often, if not always, seen in black animals, but never the reverse. We may, therefore, assume a distinct agency for the conversion of brown into black and call this factor B. If by a given cross this factor B is added to a certain distributional stage of brown, the corresponding distributional stage of black is obtained, showing that the factor B is independent of the distributive factors. Such factors as Y, Br, and B, indicating as they do distinct qualitative steps in pigment formation, we may call formative factors, in somewhat the same way as the factors controlling the distribution and amount of pigment have been considered distributive factors. FORMATIVE COLOR FACTORS. 19 LOCATION OF PIGMENT. In wild mammals all three pigments (yellow, brown, and black) commonly occur in the same hair. In many domesticated or '"fancy" varieties, one or the other pigment prevails almost, if not quite, to the exclusion of the others; thus yellow, brown, and black varieties arise. Brown varieties (completely lacking black) occur in certain mammals (e. g., mice, rabbits, guinea-pigs, and dogs). Theoretically they would seem to be possible in all. Pigment appears in mice in three general regions. These are the eyes, the skin, and the hair. The pigment occurs in granules. In the eyes microscopic examination has shown that the pigment granules are located in both the retina and the iris. Of these two localities the iris seems the more permanent pigment-producing center; for when reduction in the amount of pigment occurs the retina seems the more easily and extensively affected. In the skin the pigment is located only a short distance from the surface in the malpighian layer. In contradistinction to the eyes, which are visibly pigmented at birth, the skin apparently becomes pigmented only after the animal is several days old; this is largely because the hairs, in which much of the pigment lies, are not formed at birth. The pigment granules of the hair may be clearly observed under the microscope. Bateson (1903), among other investigators, has determined their location with considerable accuracy and finds that they are situated in the cortex or outer sheath of the hair, and also in the interior of the hair in the proximal walls of the medullary spaces. To recapitulate, we find three general pigment-producing regions in mice: thej-ye. the skin, and the hair. The pigments (melanins) produced are limited to three: yellow, brown, and black — which we consider to be caused by the action (jointly or severally) of the factors Y, Br, and B. Domesticated or "fancy" varieties of mice appear to differ from the wild in the partial or com- plete exclusion of one or more of the pigments. Such exclusion may be the result of (1) the action of a distributive factor, or (2) the loss of the formative factor necessary to the production of a particular pigment. FORMATIVE COLOR FACTORS. 1. The General Color Factor, Y. It has long been recognized by investigators that, in mice, pigmented vari- eties differ from albinos by a single mendelian unit-character. Thus in crosses between homozygous self-pigmented and albino animals we find that the first generation (F^ consists entirely of pigmented animals. If these first-genera- tion hybrids be then crossed inter se we should expect in F-> that the ratio 3 pigmented young to 1 albino would be approximated. The experimental results agree well with this expectation and we have as a result of crossing Fi inter se: Pigmented. Albino. Observed.. Expected.. 59S 003 206 201 20 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. If we consider, in addition to tin.' above result, those obtained in a similar cross by other investigators, we may construct the following table: Pigmented. Albino. Allen ( Jrampe Cudnot 1 >arbishire 240 164 269 lis 80S 232 49 598 97 57 93 137 255 77 14 206 Durham von Guaita Parsons-Copeman* ... Little Total observed. . Expected 2,778 936 2,785.5 928.5 *SeeBateson (1903). In the cross between the heterozygous pigmented animals obtained in Fx and pure albinos, where equality of pigmented and albino young is expected, the following result has been obtained: Pigmented. Albino. Observed Expected 21 16 18.5 18.5 As this cross has been largely neglected in my experiments the numbers are extremely small. If, however, a table is made showing the work of other inves- tigators, larger and more valuable results are obtained : Pigmented. Albino. Allen 84 106 31 24 59 21 CI 119 33 20 59 16 Darbishire Durham von (iiuiiiu Parsons-Copeman Little Total observed. . Expected ::■-'.'. 311 31S 318 All investigators have found that when albino mice are crossed inter se, only albino young are produced. Albinism is, then, a recessive character. Cuenot (1903) considered albinism due to the loss of the general color factor C (chromogen), but for the reasons given by Riddle this interpretation seems of doubtful validity. As before stated, mammalian pigment results from the action of an enzyme or enzymes upon a chromogen substance. Albinos are formed from colored varieties by the loss or restriction of one of these substances. Present chemical evidence discredits the possible loss of the chromogen; the enzyme or enzymes remain to be considered. Albinos probably lack one or more of these. If FORMATIVE COLOR FACTORS. 21 further chemical investigation should show that what albinos lack is really chromogen, as Cuenot supposed, no change in the gametic formula; here used will be necessary, beyond the addition of a symbol C (chromogen) in the case of colored animals. In the writer's opinion the only enzyme which all albinos in common lack is that which acting alone produces the lowest grade of melanin pigment, namely, yellow. To this supposed factor I have given the designation Y. The factor B may or may not be present in an albino, but Br apparently is never lost. Y then forms the step between color and no color, producing yellow when pres- ent, no color being produced in its absence. This yellow is converted to brown pigment by the ever-present factor Br, whose action, however, is locally inhi- bited wherever yellow pigment appears as the final oxidation stage. 2. The Brown-Producing Color Factor, Br. This factor, in my experience, is never wanting, though its presence is often at least partly concealed by the factor B, which carries forward the process of pigment formation from the brown to the black stage. In albinos, also, when Y (the factor for producing yellow) is absent the factor Br, lacking the material on which to act, does not function visibly. Thus it is not to be wondered at that this factor Br has been omitted from the zygotic formulae of most investigators and that brown is considered commonly the result of the absence of black. The chemical evidence already given, however, together with the fact that brown pigment is often, if not always, to be found in black animals, seems to justify the use of a distinct term to designate the factor that forms brown. This factor is not to be confused with the absence of the factor for black formation, which is a pure negation and can not be considered as an active agent in the formation of anything. 3. The Black-Producing Color Factor, B. As before stated, this factor is necessary for the production of the highest stage of mammalian pigment, viz, black. In its absence, the final oxidation stage is brown, so that we may speak of " animals lacking black" as brown, but it is conceivable that animals might be found which also lack Br, in which case the final oxidation stage would be yellow, not brown, and mere absence of black would not in that case be equivalent to brown. If we cross, then, animals homozygous for the factor B with animals entirely lacking that factor, we should expect Fi to consist entirely of heterozy- gous black animals. By experiment, 589 animals have been produced in this way, all of which possessed black pigment. We should expect, now, that if such black animals are crossed inter se, the next generation will consist of three animals possessing black pigment to one lacking it completely. When this cross was made the following result was obtained : Black. Brown. Observed Expected 591 216 (105.25 201.75 1 22 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. In the cross between heterozygous black animals and the extracted brown recessives, where equality of black young and young lacking black are expected, the following result lias been obtained: Black. Brown. ( >bserved Expected 1'is 192.5 187 L92.5 If brown animals are crossed inter se, only brown young are expected. The observed facts coincide with the expectation, 822 brown young having been thus obtained. It is, then, clear that the presence of the factor for the production of black pigment and its absence result in a pair of allelomorphic unit characters. In all the cases above mentioned the heterozygous black animals wrere indistin- guishable from the homozygous blacks, so far as external appearances go. The dominance of black is thus apparently complete. Miss Durham (1911), how- ever, has recorded the occurrence of a distinct heterozygous form ("chocolate lilac") in crosses between pink-eyed black ("blue lilac") and pink-eyed brown ("champagne") mice. The writer has made similar crosses with animals of these color varieties, but is unable to confirm Miss Durham's results. Pink-eyed black mice vary in depth and intensity of pigmentation, which fact will be discussed more fully under the head of distributive factors, but the writer has been unable to detect any greater degree of brownness in the pink- eyed blacks which are heterozygous ("chocolate lilacs ") than in those wrhich are homozygous. While it is possible that microscopic examination of the hair of such heterozygous pink-eyed black animals may reveal a greater relative amount of brown than occurs in the homozygous form of the same color variety, it seems of doubtful propriety to call the heterozygous form a distinct color variety. Furthermore, if the distinction between homozygous and heterozy- gous pink-eyed blacks were a good one, it should be recognizable in the hetero- zygotes produced by crossing pink-eyed black agouti with pink-eyed brown agouti types. Miss Durham, however, mentions no such difference between homozygous and heterozygous pink-eyed black agoutis, and I have been unable to find any such difference in my own experiments. Black, in its method of inheritance, forms one of the best examples of a mendelian unit character. It is, moreover, clearly a positive character which is dominant over its absence, or chemically expressed it is a higher oxidation stage epistatic to a lower stage and independent of the latter in inheritance. DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. We have seen that three factors act as agents in the formation of the pigments of mice. We may now consider the factors concerned in controlling the distribution of pigments thus formed. It is obvious that theoretically the distribution of pigment may be controlled in two general ways: (1) by the DISTRIBl TIVK COLOR FACTORS. 23 ability to form either a greater or less total amount of pigment ; or (2) by the restriction or loss of one or more pigments from certain portions of the pelage, thus producing "coat patterns.'' The existence of two distinct factors of each of these types has been proved by experiment. These will be presently described. For a basis from which to calculate increase or diminution in the total amount of pigmentation (the first category of modifications mentioned), it is desirable to have, as a standard, some known stock of as nearly constant pigmentation as possible. For this purpose none seems better than the wild house-mouse, Mus musculus. There is, to be sure, variation among the wild individuals of this species, but on the whole it forms as satisfactory and constant a basis as can be obtained. To the factor producing the degree of pigmentation observed in the common house-mouse wTe may give the designation D (density of pigmentation). This factor D affects the distribution of pigment granules of the three sorts, yellow7, brown, and black, but there is experimental evidence that another factor exists which determines the amount of brown and black granules present with- out affecting the number of yellow granules in the coat. To this factor we may give the designation P (plenitude or fulness of brown and black pigmentation). There is a complete series of color varieties as described by Castle and the writer (1909), in which simultaneous modifications of both these factors exist, as well as two other series in each of which one only of the two factors is modified. Of the second category of distributive factors, those which cause local restriction or loss of certain pigments, there are two clear examples in mice. The first of these is seen in the case of the wild type, where the so-called "agouti" pattern exists. This pattern results from the activity of a factor determining the order in which pigments are laid down in the individual hair, and also producing a differentiation between hairs of the dorsal and ventral surfaces. This factor we may designate A (agouti). A factor of this sort produces the "ticked" coat characteristic of almost all wild rodents. In the absence of A, animals are self-colored.* The second factor of this category is a restrictive factor which almost excludes black and brown pigment from the hair and skin, thus leaving a pre- ponderance of yellow granules in those localities and producing the so-called "yellow" varieties of mice. This factor we may call R (restriction). In its absence colored animals are either agouti if A is present, or self-colored if A is absent.* From this very brief description it may be seen that the presence of certain distributive factors, or modifications of them, determines what color varieties of mice shall be formed. These distributive factors determine either the total amount of pigmentation or the relative amounts of yellow, brown, and black that are visible. It is, then, obvious that they are factors dealing with "quan- tity" of pigment, not with "quality" of pigment, as do the formative factors Y, Br, and B. Since the "distributive" factors D, P, A, and ft deal with *This ignores spotted forms, which will be considered separately. 24 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. quantity of pigment, we might expect that they would show more fluctuations than do the formative or qualitative factors Y, Br, and B; and such is the case, as will presently be more fully described. 4. The Distributive Factor, D. We have stated that this factor is responsible for the degree of density of yellow, brown, and black pigmentation seen in the common wild house-mouse. The presence of this factor is allelomorphic to a modification of density of pig- mentation which we may call " dilute" pigmentation and designate by d. This dilute type of pigmentation was recognized by Bateson (1903) in mice. At that time he stated that it consisted of a reduced number of pigment granules, affecting both the cortex and medulla of the hair. To this the writer may add that the pigmentation of the skin is visibly lessened in "dilute " forms, and that the eyes are also affected. When the eye of a "dilute" mouse is examined under the microscope, reduction in the amount of pigment, as compared with the densely pigmented forms, is seen to exist. This reduction occurs in both retina and iris, but is more extensive in the former locality than in the latter. The dilute forms of rabbits, as compared with the intense forms, show, on microscopic examination of the hair, a reduction in number of the pigment gran- ules in the cortex of the hair. The dilution in this case seems transferable to hair of any color and is therefore comparable to dilution in mice, as it is also in superficial resemblance, having a streaky and washed-out appearance to the unaided eye. In guinea-pigs the condition seems somewhat different. The problem there does not appear to have been worked out with especial reference to dilu- tion. There dilute forms do not appear streaky, although the cream type of reduction seems either directly or indirectly transferable to black and brown. It seems, however, doubtful whether a true dilution exists in guinea-pigs. There is no evidence showing a modification of the intense colors, which modification behaves as a unit character; and it seems probable, from the recent occurrence of a pink-eyed colored guinea-pig (Castle, 19126), that the reduction of pigment seen in guinea-pigs is due to a modification approaching that seen in pink-eyed mice, rather than the dilute modification. The "dilute" modification affects all three pigments (yellow, brown, and black), wherever they may occur. Castle and the writer (1909) recognized this in mice in the "non-yellow " varieties, including those possessing the agouti factor. Plate (1910) recognizes a dilute series of color varieties, though using a slightly different nomenclature to designate them. Morgan (1911a) inde- pendently puts on record the occurrence of dilute animals with the agouti pattern. Miss Durham (1911) also recognizes the existence of a dilute type of every color variety. Previous to that time, however, she had not recog- nized the relation of the dilute agouti animals to the dilute "non-agouti" forms. Entirely distinct from this modification of the factor for density of pig- mentation, which produces dilute forms, is the fluctuation of the degree of density itself. Though "density" and "dilution" act as a pair of allelomor- DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 2.J phic characters, "density" is subject to considerable fluctuation. Thus we may have a gradual series of yellow mice, all possessing the factor D, but varying in depth of pigmentation from an extremely light cream-color to a deep rich orange. Microscopic examination of the hair of these various forms shows in "cream" animals a distinctly smaller amount of pigment than in the hairs of the darker grades of "dilute" yellow animals. Dilute animals also vary in depth of color. For example, certain dilute browns may be of a dis- tinctly lighter color than others. We know from the behavior of "density" and "dilution" in crosses that they are allelomorphic to each other, but we must admit that they are fluctuating characters and not stable in the sense of the formative qualitative factors Y, Br, and B. The differences in depth of color in the case of any color variety, either intense or dilute, are more easily dis- cerned in those animals which have a preponderance of light pigment, such as yellows, or in those possessing reduction in amount of pigment due to some modification, such as dilute dark-eyed and intense pink-eyed mice. In this connection it is interesting to note the occurrence of certain "coat patterns" on mice, reported by Morgan (1911a). He describes, among others, patterns consisting of distinct regions of lighter and darker color. He further states that when the light hairs are examined under the microscope they show a lessening of pigment granules in different regions, "a lessening that is a characteristic feature of the so-called dilute condition." But as reduction in the amount of pigment occurs in the case of the "light" densely pigmented and the "pink-eyed" forms, as well as in the dilute forms, evidences of the sort offered by Morgan can not be considered to establish his conclusion. Is it not possible that these cases are those of intensely pigmented animals showing on their coat somatic segregation of certain of the fluctuations that are seen in dense pigmentation? Such "lightness" would not be in any way correlated with dilution, and would appear in homozygous animals as well as in heterozygous ones. The writer suggested (19116) that such patterns as were described might not be a criterion of the heterozygosity of their possessor, but due entirely to the physiological condition of the animal at moulting. Morgan in reply (1911c) stated that the cases he described were not "moulting" patterns, which were, as he stated, "too familiar to * * * call for comment." Yet in his first paper (1911a) he mentions certain "gray" animals, and figures two, which, as he states, "show areas of lighter and darker color, and these may come and go at each ?noult." The writer has obtained in a homozygous dilute brown animal (cf 317) regions of clearly lighter hair than the predominant body color of the individual. These lighter hairs are apparently full-grown, and remained clearly distin- guishable in this animal for nearly a year, after which the animal died. If this individual was heterozygous he might, as Morgan states, be considered as giving "evidence of his dual nature," but his gametic composition is "single;" so per- haps the "evidence" in the case of the heterozygous animals reported by Morgan is a matter of coincidence. 26 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. The above-described fluctuations in the density of pigmentation are to a certain extent hereditary. Thus cream-colored mice crossed inter se have a greater number of cream-colored than of deep-yellow young. So, too, from deep-yellows crossed together the deep-yellow young preponderate, but cream- colored young may occur as well. We may now consider the result of crosses between intense animals pos- sessing the factor D and animals with the modified or "dilute" condition d. If homozygous intensely pigmented animals (DD) are crossed wtih dilute animals (dd) only intense young (Dd) are formed in F\. In my experiments 424 young have been thus produced, all intense, manifesting D. If these het- erozygotes are crossed together we should expect in F2 the ratio 3 intense to 1 dilute young. The experimental results are as follows: Intense. Dilute. Observed 610 Expected 608.25 205 203 . 75 When the heterozygous intense animals are crossed back with the dilute type the following results have been obtained: Intense. Dilute. Observed Expected 301 249 197 249 Here there is a marked deficiency of dilute animals, which is in all prob- ability partly due to failure on my part to recognize as dilute certain of the pink- eyed dilute animals produced during the years 1907-08. During these years many matings of this type were made. In classifying the young obtained from these I may have been in error. Thus if we consider the matings made since 1908, which should theoretically produce both dilute and intense young, we should have the following results: ^ f, , L, Cross of heterozygous Ft Cross of heterozygous f, int ;mmiafs wi h intense animals inter se.\ recessive. Intense. Dilute. Intense. Dilute. Observed. . Expected . . 3 15 363 . 75 140 1 Hi 121.25 L56 166 156 Here there is an excess of dilute animals, which makes it seem probable that in the matings previous to 1909, of the two types given above, I confused the dilute and intense pink-eyed forms, often failing to distinguish them cor- DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 27 rectly. However, I feel sure that errors of this sort have not occurred since 1909, and the figures given above may be considered as a correct representation of the observed facts. For the most part the behavior of density and dilution is clearly that of a pair of allelomorphic unit characters, and they may therefore be treated as such. Thus dilute animals crossed inter se give, as expected, only dilute young, 603 such animals having been produced. 5. The Distributive Factor, P. As before stated, this factor affects brown and black pigment, but does not affect the amount of yellow present. The modification of this factor giving rise to the "pink-eyed " series of colored mice, reduces the amount of black and brown pigment to a very great extent. The reduction affects hair, skin, and eyes. Miss Durham (1908) has pointed out the fact that the eyes, as the hair, are not entirely devoid of pigment. In examining with the microscope sections of the eye of a "pink-eyed" colored mouse, she found traces of pigment present, but in such- minute quantities as to make any qualitative analysis impossible. The writer has examined under the microscope crushed eyes of the brown, dilute brown, pink-eyed brown, and pink-eyed dilute brown varieties and has thus been able to trace the steps in the reduction of pigment in these four vari- eties with fair success. The eyes were prepared by dehydrating and clearing in xylol. The lens was then removed and the iris and retina spread on the slide and mounted in balsam. When thus prepared, the following conditions were observed: (1) In intense-brown animals, the iris is more heavily pigmented than the retina, but both are thickly pigmented with brown only, no yellow. (2) In dilute-brown animals, there is reduction of the total amount of pig- ment, but the retina shows the effects of the reduction more than does the iris. The pigment is brown only, no yellow. (3) In pink-eyed intense-brown animals there is very little pigment in the retina. The iris is moderately pigmented, but much less so than in the dilute- brown form. The pigment is brown only. (4) In pink-eyed dilute-brown animals the retina is apparently unpig- mented, but the iris still contains a small amount of brown pigment. No yellow pigment is present. We may now turn to the experimental results obtained in crosses between dark-eyed animals (PP) and pink-eyed animals (pp). In this case Fi consists entirely of dark-eyed animals (Pp), 1,085 individuals having been thus obtained, all dark-eyed and to external appearances indistinguishable from homogyzous dark-eyed animals. These Fx heterozygotes crossed inter se have given the following result : Dark-eyed. Pink-eyed. Observed Expected. . . . 1,673 1,597.5 457 5^2.5 28 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. If these results are added to those obtained by Miss Durham in similar matings we have : I >ark-eyed. Pink-eyed. Durham 876 Little 1.G73 Total observed. . 2,549 Expected 2,481.6 303 457 760 827.4 The result is not strikingly close to the expected numbers. There is in my experiments a deficiency of pink-eyed animals too extensive to be overcome by t he excess of pink-eyed obtained by Miss Durham. The difference in result in the two cases may be considered as probably too great to be due entirely to chance.* Furthermore, in the following cross the result is still more aberrant and again there is a lack of pink-eyed animals. The cross is that of heterozy- gous dark-eyed animals (Pp) with pink-eyed animals (pp). Equality of dark- eyed and pink-eyed young is expected. Dark-eyed. 370 327 Pink-eyed. Observed. . . Expected .... 284 327 Here, if the higher numbers (gained by adding Miss Durham's results) are considered, the numbers are closer to equality, though still widely unequal : Dark-eyed. Pink-eyed. Durham 105 370 113 ■ >s : Little Total observed . . ' 475 397 436 436 It is possible that in the " pink-eyed" animals of my strain some constitu- tional weakness exists, either directly connected with the "pink-eyed" modi- fication or to a marked degree correlated with it, which tends to cause a higher degree of mortality among the pink-eyed than among the dark-eyed young. I have tried, so far as possible, to record the eye-color of young at birth, but have failed in many cases. Even if it had been possible, it would not be safe to state that animals with apparently unpigmented eyes were all pink-eyed colored forms, for albinos at birth are indistinguishable from the pink-eyed colored series. When "pink-eyed colored animals are crossed inter se, only "pink-eyed" animals have been produced; 496 young have been thus obtained. *Using the method described by East & Hayes (1911) p. 37, we find that the deviation from the expected ratio is 0.0810, while the probable error is ±0.0752. DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 29 "Pink-eyed" colored varieties are much "yellower" in appearance than their corresponding dark-eyed intense and dilute forms. This is due to two facts : (1) That in such forms as the pink-eyed black agouti and pink-eyed brown agouti (both intense and dilute) the yellow band of the agouti pattern is left fully pigmented, while the black and brown pigment in the same hairs is much reduced in amount. Similarly pink-eyed yellow animals possess fully pigmented yellow hair and thus have as heavily pigmented coats as do the dark-eyed yellow types. (2) In the pink-eyed black and pink-eyed brown varieties (intense and dilute) there are no yellow pigment granules in the hair, but the extremely small amount of black or brown pigment present gives the optical effect of an animal with yellow pigment. This is especially marked in the case of the pink-eyed brown variety. The mutual independence of the factors D and P, and of their modifica- tions d and p, was recognized by Castle and the writer (1909) and found to hold good in all the color varieties, whether possessing the agouti pattern or not. At that time we reported the cross of a dilute "dark-eyed" animal with an intense "pink-eyed" animal, resulting in the production of a "dark-eyed in- tense " Fi. We had then only a small number of F2 animals from such crosses, but those showed that the four theoretical classes of offspring were produced. In similar crosses we have now obtained the following result: Observed. . . Expected. . . Dark-eyed Dark-eyed j Pink-eyed Pink-eyed intense. dilute. intense. dilute. 71 32 28 6 77 25.7 2.5.7 8 6 Other crosses showing the independence of D and P have been made, and the results all follow the expectations with reasonable accuracy. Miss Durham (1911) has also recognized the independence of D and P, but without giving numerical results showing the occurrence of the intense and dilute types of the various pink-eyed color varieties. She, however, recognizes the independence of pink-eye and dilution only in those mice "in which yellow is absent." The fact that their independence has been observed and experimentally proved in animals (agouti) in which yellow is present seems to remove this restriction. Thus, for example, the cross reported in 1909, and already referred to, shows that their independence is clear-cut, even in the individual hair, and that the presence of yellow in the hair aids in showing their independence; for in the dilute agoutis (browm or black) all the pigment in the hair is reduced in amount, while in the pink-eyed agoutis (brown or black), the yellow band in the hair is as heavily pigmented as in dark-eyed agouti forms. We may now consider, in order, the two factors which have to do with the relative distribution of the three pigments, yellow, brown, and black, in the hair and skin. These factors A (agouti) and R (restriction), already briefly described, have certain characteristics in" common, and evidence exists (as will 30 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. be discussed later) that they may be closely related. Their sphere of action is limited to the hair and skin, to the exclusion of the eye. In this respect they differ fundamentally from the distributive factors D and P, already described. G. The Distributive Factor, A. This factor was first recognized by Cuenot (1902) under the designation of G (gris), as producing the pattern seen on the coat of the wild house-mouse ; but he erred in considering the factor (7 as allelomorphic to the factor N (noir) for the production of black pigment. Castle (1907a) proved that in guinea-pigs the agouti pattern is a unit character allelomorphic to its absence. Guided by this hypothesis he formed a new color variety of guinea-pig (cinnamon). Furthermore, he proved (1907a) that the agouti pattern might be carried by certain red animals, which when crossed with blacks produced agouti young in the first generation. By experimental test it was proved that all black animals behaved the same in the crosses made and that the reds differed. Morgan (1911a) quotes Castle as stating that in the above-mentioned crosses both the blacks and reds were able to transmit the agouti type of coat. Having thus misquoted ( astle, Morgan offers as a suggestion the explanation which Castle proved was correct in 1907. The agouti pattern consists in mice (Allen, 1904) of two chief types of dor- sal hairs: (1) Those having a fine black tip, a sub-apical band of light ochraceous color (occupying about one-fifth of the hair) and a dark plumbeous basal por- tion. (2) Others, less numerous, are black throughout. The ventral hairs Allen describes as possessing a distal half, which is dirty white to pale ochraceous buff, and a basal half which is plumbeous. Castle (19076), in describing the agouti pattern in guinea-pigs, states that the tips are Itlack in hairs showing the ticking; then follows a yellow or red band, and then the hair is black to the base. Both of these investigators find that the "ticked " hairs have black tips, as does Hurst (1905) in the case of rabbits. Morgan (1911a) states that he has obtained black animals which have cer- tain of their hairs brown-tipped. These he characterizes as agoutis without the yellow band and further states that the ticked hairs in the coat of "agouti" animals are brown-tipped. It isobvious that he is dealing with acolorpattern in his "gray" (agouti) animals which is not identical with the agouti pattern as described by other investigators. It tends, therefore, to confusion to treat the pattern that he is dealing with as agouti. Furthermore, it seems probable that the blacks, which he reports as having ticked {brown-tipped) hairs, do not possess a factor in the least comparable with the "agouti" pattern. Morgan himself states that these brown-tipped hairs occur only in heterozygous black mice. The question suggests itself, how can mice possess, as a result or neces- sary concomitant of heterozygosis, a pattern which is the characteristic of a homozygous wild race? Bateson (1903) stated that in black mice the tips of the large contour hairs are often brown. Ticked hairs in non-agouti (black) mice are not, then, a new development, and as black mice have been long used in experiments and have DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 31 never been found to transmit the agouti pattern, it seems that Morgan has been misled by the superficial appearance of "ticking" in the hair. That superficial ticking is not identical with the agouti pattern is observ- able in the case of "sable" mice, as will be more fully discussed later. It is also observable in certain "dingy" or "smoky" young produced by Himalayan rabbits. In this case there may be as many as two light bands in the " ticked " hairs, the dark portions of which seem to contain a small amount of black pig- ment producing the dingy appearance alluded to. In such cases it is known that neither parent carries the agouti pattern, yet here are hairs with an apj)a- rently similar ticking; therefore not all ticking of rodent hairs is due to the same factor. We may now consider crosses in which the "agouti" pattern is involved. In the cross between homozygous agouti and non-agouti forms, Fi consists entirely of agouti (black agouti or brown agouti) animals, 344 young having been thus obtained. When certain of these heterozygous F\ animals were crossed inter se there were obtained : Agouti. Non-agouti. Observed .... Expected 257 243.75 74 81.25 If the heterozygous Fi agoutis are crossed with non-agouti mice we should expect equality of agouti and non-agouti young. In this cross I have obtained : Agouti. Non-agouti. Observed .... Expected .... 194 182 170 182 When non-agouti animals are crossed inter se only non-agouti young are produced, the numbers in this case being 1,812. From the result of these crosses it may be stated that the agouti pattern, though it may or may not be a single unit character, certainly behaves like one. Until it has been shown to be complex, the only safe course seems to be to con- sider it simple and allelomorphic to its absence. 7. The Distributive Factor, R. This factor produces the true yellow varieties of mice by an almost com- plete exclusion of brown and black from the skin and hair. In those localities, therefore, the process of pigment formation is carried only as far as the "yellow" stage. The chief point of importance in connection with the appearance of yellow in the coat is this: Yellow-pigment granules, so far as experimental evi- dence goes, never appear in the skin and hair of mice unless certain distributive factors (A or R) are present to exclude part or all of the brown and black from those localities. In such regions oxidation beyond the yellow stage is impos- 32 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. sible. In the absence of factors .1 and R the oxidation proceeds, over the whole coat, to the stage determined by the presence of the formative factors, Br or B. "Yellow'' mice are not produced by a factor comparable to the factors Br and B, but by a factor having an entirely different function, namely, that of restriction or inhibition. The nature of the agouti factor A is also restrictive, though in a much more limited degree. Thus the factors A and R have func- tions which are roughly comparable, in that they both "restrict" the formation of black and brown, allowing yellow to take their place. In studying the relation of "yellow" to black agouti mice, Miss Durham (1911) has obtained extremely interesting and valuable results. Thus she has in two eases obtained a "yellow" animal from agouti parents, which is a rever- sal of the ordinary conditions. The fact that such a reversal of dominance can exist is of extreme importance and adds one more peculiarity to the genetic behavior of "yellow " mice. In all crosses made by the writer, however, yellow has proved epistatic to black agouti. When the black agouti young obtained from yellows were crossed inter se, 71 young were obtained, none of which were yellow. When cream (fig. 18) is crossed with wild black agouti the yellow young obtained are cream; thus 3 cream and 2 light-black agouti young have been obtained. The wild black agouti possesses potentially a "cream" degree of pigmentation. If creams are crossed with black agouti animals produced by synthesis in experiments with other varieties, the yellow young produced arc yellow, not cream, thus 12 yellows and G intense non-yellow young have been produced. These synthesized agoutis, then, are not potentially cream, but are darker-colored members of the series which fluctuates between cream and deep orange. Cuenot (1905) reported the fact that homozygous yellow mice were not obtainable in his extensive experiments. This fact has been corroborated by other investigators. Cuenot (1911) has stated that the factor R, which restricts brown and black from the pelage, is the same in function as the factor Y, which forms the "yellow" degree of oxidation, and that there is no need of including both in the gametic formulae of mice. But chemical evidence indi- cates that all brown or black pigmented mice must possess the ability to form yellow pigment in order to form the higher stages, viz, brown and black. Furthermore, they must possess this at times in all their gametes, otherwise a homozygous brown or black animal would be impossible. 1", therefore, which produces the yellow degree of oxidation is not comparable to R, which can occur in only one of the gametes of a zygote and which restricts brown and black forming material, thus producing visibly yellow mice. Alice homozygous in Y are represented by wild black agoutis, but mice homozygous in R need not occur, by any present theory, nor do they occur in actual experiment. Yellow varieties of mice exist, as Cuenot (1911) recognizes, in all the color varieties in which non-yellow mice exist. Their external appearance, however, leads one to identify only six types, namely : (1) black-eyed yellows, brown-eyed distributing: color factors. :;:; yellows, black-eyed dilute yellows, and brown-eyed dilute yellows in the "dark- eyed" series; (2) pink-eyed yellows and pink-eyed dilute yellows in the pale series. The experimenter can not distinguish by external appearances the black eyed and brown-eyed forms of the pink-eyed yellow series, and so must class them together unless breeding tests be applied. The "yellow" coat of mice is due to as true a patter)) factor as is the agoul i coat, and the investigator errs when he considers the "yellow coat" a lower stage of development of a black or brown coat. Yellow pigment appears in the ticked or agouti coat by the action of a factor whose function is of a restrict ire or inhibitive nature. In a very similar fashion yellow pigment appears on a. greater scale in the coat of the "yellow" mouse. "Yellow" in mice is no more allelomorphic to gray than is gray allelomor- phic to black. Castle, as already stated, has shown that the factor which pro- duces the ticked or gray coat is allelomorphic to its absence, not to black or any other pigment. It is an excellent thing to simplify gametic formula? when this can be done with the support of experimental evidence, but the experimental work should precede the "simplification" unless a false impression is to be produced. If yellow animals are crossed with non-yellow, equality of yellow and non- yellow young is approximated. The following numbers have 1 >een obtained : Yellow. Non-yel 1 1 >w. ( )bserved .... 864 Expected 868 872 868 Several litters of young have been produced by yellows mated inter se since the publication in 1910 of figures showing approximately a 2 to 1 ratio. The additional observations are: Yellow. Non-yellow. Expected, 2 to 1 Expected, 3 to 1 48 45 2 51 20 22 6 17 If these figures be added to those obtained by Miss Durham (1911), by Cuenot (1903), and by Castle and the writer (1910), the following result is obtained: Yell ow. Non-ye How. Miss Durham (1911) Cuenot (1903) lis 203 1,024 48 232 100 538 2!) Castle & Little (1910).... Little (1910 and 1911) Total 1,783 1,782.2 2,004.75 890 891 668.25 Expected, 2 to 1. .. . Expected, 3 to 1 ... . 34 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. The relation of the restriction factor It to the factors P and D has been considered brief!}' under the head of those factors. The occurrence of dilute yellow mice, clearly distinguishable from "creams" or "light yellows," was reported by the writer (1911) in the dark-eyed color series. Since that time a few crosses have been made with pink-eyed dilute yellows and they have been found to conform in their general behavior with other yellow varieties. They apparently can not be obtained in a homozygous state, and when crossed inter se give pink-eyed dilute yellow and pink-eyed dilute non-yellow, as 2 to 1. Dilute yellow animals, whether clear, sooty, or sable, are in appearance more heavily pigmented than are the lightest creams; but they, as the intense yellows, are found in shadesof yellowthat vary between cream and deep orange. Any and all dilute yellows have, however, the characteristic streaky, washed- out look of the dilute black or dilute brown forms. In crosses, dilute yellows bred inter se have given: Observed Expected, 2 to 1 . . Expected, 3 to 1 . . Dilute yellow. Dilute non-yellow. 100 102.67 115.5 54 51.33 38.5 It will, then, be seen that dilute yellows, like intense yellowTs, give a 2 to 1 ratio, the homozygous type being apparently unable to develop. Dilute yellows crossed with dilute non-yellows have given the following: Dilute Dilute j-ellow. non-yellow. Observed Expected 61 58.5 56 58.5 8. Sooty Yellows and Sables. It is well-known that varieties of yellow mice exist which have a varying amount of dark pigment (brown or black) in the hairs on their dorsal and lateral surfaces; this produces types of yellow known as "sooty yellows" or "sables." The amount of dark pigment varies from a few dark hairs, scattered along the mid-dorsal line, to a condition in which the whole dorsal and nearly all the lateral surfaces are dark, leaving yellow confined to the more ventral portions of the sides and to the belly. A series of arbitrary grades indicating the degree of sootiness has been constructed within the past year. By this means it is hoped to get more accurate ideas as to the nature of sooty yellows. The grades are based upon skins of "sooty" animals and these skins are used as the types by which the living animals are graded. Several experiments have been at- tempted with the sooty yellows, but all these are still in a preliminary state. Higher numbers of individuals from experiments now in progress may tend to change the conclusions to be drawn from work with this variety. DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 35 The sooty yellows in my stock are most of them homozygous for Mark, i. e., BB. The question arose, how would such sooty forms behave if crossed with clear yellow lacking B. Experimental evidence shows that sooty yellows hav- ing only one dose of B are not as dark as those with two doses. Thus 7451 sooty (grade +lf) when crossed with sooty yellow female 7152 (+I4) gave sooty yellow young, the average grade of which was+1. The same male when crossed with a brown ( 9 7730) gave yellow young, the grades of which averaged +.31. The writer has never obtained a sooty yellow or sable that did not carry the factor for the production of black pigment (B) in at least half its gametes. Several hundred sooty yellows or sables have been obtained. Yellows having one dose of B when crossed inter se should give (besides yellows of their own type) those lacking B entirely as well as those having two doses of B. If the "sooty" character segregates, 25 per cent of the yellow animals should approximate the grade of their "sooty" grandparent, 50 per cent should resemble their parents, and 25 per cent should be clear yellow like their other grandparent. A table follows, showing the results of two families in this experiment. The numbers of young are as yet small. Sooty yellow x brown. Grade of sooty grand- parent. No. of Fi yellow young. Average grade of Fi yellows. No. of F2 yellow young. Grades of F3 yellow young. Average of Fi yellow young. 0 .25 .50 .75 1.00 + .25.... + 1.25.... ■ 12 + .06 4 +.31 7 6 7 1 2 2 1 + .00 + .42 It will, then, be seen that when the sooty grandparent is of low grade, + j, nearly clear yellow, his "sooty" character is to all intents and purposes lost in the cross with brown. It fails to reappear in F2, so far as the animals obtained are concerned. When the grade of the sooty grandparent is 5 times as great, that is, +1.25, it will be seen that the average grade of Fx is also about 5 times a 3 great (that is, 0.31 as compared with 0.06). Also in F2 darker forms are obtained which may approach the degree of sootiness seen in the grandparent. Miss Durham (191 1) is able to distinguish clearly between " sooty yellows and "sables." In this connection she characterizes "sables'* as produced in crossing yellows with blacks or browns. They have a dark black or brown streak down the middle of the back, while the rest of the mouse is yellow. Generally the hairs in the dark streak show a ticked pattern independent of whether the animal carries agouti or not. She has had certain animals (sables) which were dark-pigmented except for a yellow belly. Such animals always molted out sables. She says "sables" are not to be confused with sooty yellows, which result from mating yellow with black, and are dirty color all over with no pattern. She finds that yellows crossed inter se may give " sables." and that "sables" crossed inter se may give yellows, and that matters are 36 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. further complicated by the occurrence of so-called "reversed sables," in which the dark hairs had yellow tips and bases, with a dark subapical band. The writer must confess that he is unable to draw a clear line between "sables" and "sooty yellows" in all cases. The term sooty yellow is there- fore intended in this paper to cover both varieties. It is possible to explain the appearance of sooty yellows on the basis of fluctuation in activity of the factor R, restriction. Thus, when R is present in full strength the animal is clear yellow; if R is slightly weaker, some dark pigment shows itself. The amount of dark pigment visible becomes progressively greater as the factor R becomes weaker or takes on a rhythmical activity. Thus, if R is hampered in activity during the growth of the first part of the hair, we have a dark tip formed. But if R comes into full activity again, a yellow7 band results, followed by a second weakening of R, resulting in a dark base to the hair. This would account for the superficial similarity to the agouti pattern. " He- versed sables" may possibly result from a reversal of the order in wdiich the strong and weak periods of R occur. So, too, those very dark sooty yellows that lack the ticked-hair pattern may be considered due to continued weakness of the factor R during development of the hair of the first coat. When the second coat is formed, however, the factor R makes its appearance felt more strongly and an ordinary type of sable results, with less dark pigment than was present on the first coat. In all such cases the idea is present that there is quantitative variation in the activity of the restriction factor R, showing itself in the varying amount of black or dark pigment present. If such weakness is due to any interchange of substance between gametes or any quantitative inexactitude in the process of segregation, we should expect that repeated crosses of sooty yellows with blacks wrould tend to produce much weakened yellowrs (i. e., very dark sooty) with much black pigment, as well as modified blacks with some yellow pigment present. While this experiment has not yet been carried to large numbers it may be of interest to record the pedigree of one family: Generation. Parents. Progeny. I dM347 sooty yel. x 9 4346 black c?7451 sooty yel. x 9 7729 black c?1029 sooty yel. x{o I033}black- 9 sooty, av. + .78, and 2 blk . 4 sooty, av. + 1 • 25, and 2 blk. 6*soot3", av. + 1.50, and 7* blk. II Ill *Ainong these Booties was c?1318 (fig. 20) graded +3, darker by four "one-quarter" izrarlcs than any sooty previously obtained. The best previous was +2. Among theblacks in the same litter was cfl316, the first visibly modified black known to be homozygous in hundreds of black animals that 1 have seen. His coat is distinctly tawny. "Sooty yellows" and "sables" have not been reported in the pink-eyed series. This accords with the results expected by theory, for the modification of the factor P, which produces pink-eyed forms, reduces the brown and black DISTRIBUTIVE COLOR FACTORS. 37 pigment granules in the hair to such a degree that we should exped the dark pigment in the hairs of dark-eyed "sooty," yellows, and "sables" to be entirely lost in corresponding pink-eyed forms. We have seen that the factor which produces "yellow" mice is dominant to its absence and is (in function) an inhibitor or restrictor of brown and black. It is interesting to compare with this condition the conditions observed in rabbits and guinea-pigs. In rabbits Castle (19076) has shown the occurrence of two types of "yel- low" animals, both of which are hypostatic to non-yellow forms. The process of restriction, if it be such, that produces the yellow type of coat in rabbits is not as extensive as that which produces the clear yellow of mice. Thus all yellow rabbits which lack the factor A are, as Castle has shown, sooty; that is, they have considerable black pigment in the hair, which produces not a clear yellow, but a dull or dingy yellow coat. Such a condition, varying or fluc- tuating as it does in sooty yellows of the same gametic composition, may be called due to an imperfectly recessive character; that is to say, a condition which shows varying amounts of a dominant character on extracted recessive individuals, may be considered as showing imperfect recessiveness. Such a condition would be more explicable on the grounds that "3'ellow" in rabbits appeared as a restriction of black and brown than as a loss of those substances. Yellow in rabbits would then be, according to a nomenclature and system sug- gested bjr Dr. Castle, due to a semi-potent restrictive factor. By semi-potent is meant a positive character which must be present in all the gametes of an indi- vidual, for its manifestation in the zygote. With such semi-potent characters may be contrasted uni-potent characters, which cause visible effect in the zygote when present in one-half its gametes. An example of this category of factors is seen in the factor R, in mice, which we have been discussing. In guinea-pigs, however, we seem to have a different condition, in that sooty-yellow animals are very reirely formed. Thus yellow guinea-pigs ex- tracted as recessive from a black race are, in a great majority of cases, char yellows, whether they arc "reds" or light "creams." The occurrence of such clear yellows is more explicable on a theory demanding loss of brown and black pigment from the skin and hair than from a process of restriction, for it has been seen that restriction is at times an extremely imperfect process, subject to frequent fluctuations in degree of activity, while loss is or should be a clear-cut process, removing the possibility of frequent fluctuations by completely remov- ing the materials from which such fluctuations arise. In studying "yellow" color varieties similarity of color should not have suf- ficient value in analysis to argue a common origin of all yellow forms. Discus- sion of such a question as the origin and physiological significance of different types of yellow must, at least for the present, be based on generalities, since defi- nite evidence is wanting. On the evidence given by such general facts, the writer has above outlined a possible explanation of theobserved conditions, fully realiz- ing, however, that at best such an explanation is incomplete and unsatisfactory. 38 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. THE INHERITANCE OF SPOTTING. Spotted forms exist in all the various color varieties of mice. Such spotted or piebald animals possess an amount of white varying from a few- white hairs to a condition in which pigment occurs in the eye alone, all the coat being white. Spotting is at present one of the least-understood color phenom- ena, and further research is necessary before the correctness of any hypothesis concerning it can l>e proved. Nevertheless, it seems advisable to consider the physiological nature of spotting and to attempt to eliminate such theories as maybe shown, even with our present imperfect knowledge, to be incorrect. As stated in the first part of this paper, present chemical knowledge leads us to the belief that all mammalian pigments are melanins. Superficially, spotting appears to be partial albinism, and the question naturally arises as to whether it really is due to the same cause or causes that produce albinism, such cause or causes manifesting their presence in a lesser degree or in a mosaic condition. Experimental evidence does not support a theory which postulates the common origin of white produced by spotting and that produced by albinism. If spotting is partial albinism we should expect, when spotted animals are crossed with albinos, that only spotted or albino animals would be obtained. Among the results observed by various investigators, none show better the fal- lacy of this point of view than the classic experiments of Darbishire (1902) with crosses of spotted waltzing mice and albinos of gray (black agouti) ancestry. The appearance of uniformly pigmented animals in the first generation of this cross proved conclusively that the processes producing the white of spotted coats and the white of albinos are not only non-identical, but are fundamen- tally different. Since a difference in origin of these two types of white exists, the next matter of interest is to find out whether the difference lies in the qualitative chemical make-up of the two whites or in the nature of the distributive proc- esses which allow them to appear in the hair. Experiments bearing upon the qualitative nature of the two types of white have been made by Mudge (1909a) on piebald (spotted) and albino rats. He treated the pelage of animals of both these varieties with chemical agents cal- culated to provide an oxidizing substance which might act upon the chromogen in the white portions of the coat, if such a chromogen were preseni there. He found that the white hairs in both categories of animals became yellow, both reacting equally to the agent provided. A few months after the publication of his work on rats he obtained similar results in piebald and albino mice, by slightly varying the composition of the agent used. The writer does not possess sufficient knowledge of chemistry to comment upon the ultimate value of the work done by Mudge, but in absence of contrary evidence it seems thai his work, especially as it deals with the very types that we are considering, is worthy of confidence and forms a suitable base from which to draw conclusion-;. THE INHERITANCE OF SPOTTING. 39 If, as Riddle states, it seems absurd to postulate the complete loss of chro- mogens in albinos, we must suppose that an enzyme or enzymes have been lost, in order to prevent the formation of pigment. If, now, the work of Mudge shows that the white of spotting lacks the same class of substance as the white of albinism we must say that here also the enzyme or enzymes are absent from the white areas. But by the work of Darbishire, already alluded to, and that of later investigators as well, it is shown that the processes concerned in the origin of the two types of whites are not identical. We must then, by elimi- nation, come to the conclusion that the nature of the processes which control the distribution of the enzyme or enzymes differs in the two categories. We have seen that the amount of pigment in the hair of intense pigmented animals is dependent upon the cooperation of two factors, D and P. In the wild Mus musculus the pigment occurs distributed over the entire coat, and the animal is said to be self or uniformly pigmented. We have supposed that the distribution of pigment is controlled by certain factors. Thus we have supposed that density of pigmentation is controlled by a factor D, by the activity of which a certain amount of pigment is formed in eyes and skin and hair. We have recognized a quantitative modification of this factor in the case of dilute varieties, possessing less pigment. Since this modification affects all three pigments (yellow, brown, and black) and since we have supposed brown and black to be higher oxidation stages of yellow, it seems logical to consider D a factor modifying Y, and in this way also modify- ing Br and B, which are, so to speak, converted Y. When D is modified in amount, less Y is converted to the brown or black stage. This is the condition seen in dilute animals. Logically we should expect another type of modifica- tion of Y. In self animals Y is distributed over the whole coat. We should expect some forms in which Y was distributed only to certain portions of the body. This modification is seen in the forms in which white spots occur. Such white areas may be considered as those from which the F-forming substance is absent. Thus the relation of these factors to one another may be roughly shown as follows: Color producing substance Y Distributed in a certain f Modified in amount to degree of density = D \ form dilute varieties = d Distributed to a certain ( Modified in amount to extent (self) =S \ form spotted varieties =s If we designate the spotted (piebald) forms by the letter s, we may logi- cally consider the unmodified self forms as being of the constitution S. We would expect, then, that in crosses between a spotted race of known gametic formula (s) and a self race of formula (S) a mendelian monohybrid ratio would be observed. That such is the case has been recorded by Doncaster (1906) and by Castle and MacCurdy (1907) in the case of "hooded" and self rats. Such a type of spotting as that seen in the hooded rats is, then, a unit character so far as its behavior in crosses is concerned. Cuenot, working with mice, has found that spotted forms exist, varying greatly in proportion of white to colored areas. This series of spotted forms he accounts for by supposing that there are present a number of small factors 40 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. for the production of spotting (panachure). These he designates px, p2, Pz, pif ... . etc. (uenot is by nomeans alone in favoring multiple factors as an explanation for spotting. It is easy and attractive to imagine a factor for every observed degree of spotting The various types of spotted animals seem clear-cut, the colored and white areas seem to form a marked contrast, and the presence of many factors to produce these many forms gives an air of finality to an hypothesis which is alluring. The advantages of a multiple-factor hypothesis, however, are rendered dubious by the observed occurrence of strains which show that a certain amount of fluctuation exist- in the manifestation of even these assumed multiple units. It is questionable whether it would be possible to distinguish between a result produced by multiple factors of the number necessary to explain the occurrence of the various spotted forms and a continuous series formed by fluctuation of of the original modification which produces spotting. Observed experimental facts, however, do not favor a multiple-factor hypothesis. Thus, if multiple factors for spotting existed, the black-eyed white variety would possess the greatest number of these spotting factors. Cuenot in mice and Castle in guinea-pigs found that spotting was recessive to self in crosses. Therefore the black-eyed white forms would possess a great number of recessive spotting factors, ph p2, Ps, Pu Ph, Pe, etc. How, then, could two such animals when crossed inter se give in their young practically the whole gamut of spotted forms, as Castle (1905, p. 45), found was the case. In a somewhat similar way the presence-and-absence hypothesis meets with trouble in the same cross, i. e., black-eyed white X black-eyed white. The spotting from which the black-eyed whites are derived is recessive. It is, therefore, according to the presence-and-absence hypothesis, as advanced by Bateson and Punnett, due to the loss or absence of a factor or factors for uni- formity of pigmentation. Yet two animals having, according to this theory, lost the factors for pigment production in the coat, give young which often have a large amount of pigment on the coat. The presence-and-absence hypothesis, in order to explain this case, must imagine a degree of fluctuation in the manifestation of the spotting character which makes proof of the multiple-factor hypothesis difficult if not impossible. In the writer's opinion, present knowledge of spotted forms is too scanty to decide whether spotting is due to a process of loss of the factor for uniformity of pigmentation, or to a hypostatic restrictive factor. It seems, however, that such spotting as one encounters in guinea-pigs, hooded rats, and in many mice is a unit character subject to enormous quantitative fluctuation, and that it may be considered due to a modification of the factor Y or U which is hypo- static to unmodified or "self" forms. In view of the fact that the same substance Y is distributed in two different ways to produce spotting and dilution, Ave may consider it as consisting of an amount of pigment (D) distributed over the entire animal (S); therefore we may consider the pigment of the wild mouse as being designated by the letters DS. An animal may then be of one of the following formulae: DS intense self. Ds intense spotted. (IS dilute self, ds dilute spotted. THE INHERITANCE OF SPOTTING. 41 We have previously discussed the observable fluctuations in amount of pigment in animals possessing D, for example in yellows. The fluctuations observed in the caseof spotted animals are little if any greater in extent than the fluctuations from deep orange to cream already noted in the case of yellow mice. If there are two ways (d and s) in which the factors D and S may respec- tively be modified, we should expect that the same might hold in the case of the factor P. The quantitative modification of this factor (p), acting upon brown and black pigment to the exclusion of yellow, produces the pink-eyed colored series. If a regional modification of black and brown forming substances (Br and B) existed, we should expect a spotted condition to be formed. Here, however, the spots would be black or brown on a yellow ground. To such a class as this we may say that the tortoise varieties of guinea-pigs belong. This condition is in a measure hypostatic to self-pigmented forms, as are the (s) spotted forms. We have supposed that the factor P produced a certain amount of black or brown substance typified by the wild Mus musculus. This factor, then, ap- pears to bear the same relation to the factors Br and B that the factor D does to the factor Y. We may, therefore, logically construct a rough diagram to show the relations of the distributive factors to Br and B, as we did in the case of Y: Factors for the production of brown and black pigment Distributed in a certain ( Modified in amount to form degree of depth = P \ pink-eyed varieties = p Distributed to certain / Modified in amount to form extent (total) = T \ tortoise varieties = t If we designate the tortoise spotting by t, we may consider its epistatic allelomorph as T, total or self pigmentation. In this case the factor P becomes complicated, as did the factor D, becoming PT. As in the case of the factor DS, animals may be of any one of the following formulae: PT dark-eyed self. pT pink-eyed self. Pt dark-eyed tortoise, pt pink-eyed tortoise. In mice we find that the p modification has taken place, while in guinea- pigs the t modification is well known, and Castle (19126) has described the origin of a pink-eyed form of guinea-pig which may turn out to be the p modification. It may be seen from the foregoing description that the two forms of spotting (piebald and tortoise) are entirely independent, and it is thus entirely conceivable that they should occur in the same individual. This appears to be the case in the well-known tri-colored breeds of domesticated animals. One of the best-known cases of inheritance in tri-colored races is found in the case of "basset" hounds, on which Galton based his "law" of heredity. The character considered was the presence or absence of black in addition to yellow and white. When black was present the tri-color condition was pro- duced. Though there is no direct evidence at hand, Bateson (1909), in dis- cussing these experiments, states that yellow is not usually dominant to black. If this is the case the observed facts may be explained as follows : In guinea-pigs the presence of black and yellow spots on any individual depends upon the presence of a spotting character which acts upon a totally 42 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. black pigmented animal to produce a blotched black-and-yellow appearance. For the sake of convenience we may call animals possessing this "tortoise" marking t. All self-black animals lacking this modification, and therefore having no red blotches, are of the formula T. Experiments with guinea-pigs (at present being carried on by Dr. Castle) shows that self-black is epistatic to tortoise. This pair of characters is, however, independent from the factors, E = extended black pigmentation, necessary for the production of any black hairs on the coat, and its allelomorph e =the loss of black pigment from the coat, producing 3rellow animals. Thus, if a race of tortoise animals existed, formula EEtt, we should have a homozygous race of tortoise animals (which in fact exist). If, however, the tortoise animals were of the formula Eett we should expect young of three kinds: (a) EEtt tortoise. (b) Eett tortoise. (c) eett yellow.* Types (a) and (6) having E present would be able to form black pigment on the coat; but type (c), lacking E, would be yellow in appearance, though it would be potentially tortoise. If the factor for spotting with white (s) be added to the formula of a tor- toise animal (Eett), we should have, if these animals were bred together, three kinds of young. (a) EEttss tri-color (tortoise and white). (6) Eettss tri-color (tortoise and white), (c) eettss yellow and white.* Types (a) and (b) would be tri-color, that is, tortoise and white; type (c) would be yellow and white. This might account for the appearance of yellow and white individuals in a race of tri-colored animals. If, however, yellow were epistatic to black, as in mice, we should have to explain things differently. Tortoise animals could then be of only one formula and would breed true, being recessives, whereas self yellows might also produce tortoise young. rrtt = tortoise. Rrtt = yellow (heterozygous in tortoise). RRtt = yellow (homozygous). If, now, the modification s were added to such hypothetical tortoise animals, we should have rrttss = tri-color (tortoise and white) homozygous. If such animals were crossed inter se, we should, on genetic grounds, have to suppose a change of dominance to explain the occurrence of yellow-and- white young. This does not seem likely. A simple mechanical fact is, how- ever, able to account for the occurrence of yellow-and-white animals in an homozygous or heterozygous race of tortoise-and-white (tri-color) animals. Both forms of spotting are independent as to the regions of the coat which they affect. If the white regions should, by chance, coincide with the black regions *Castle (1905), p. 34, has described such animals. CROSSES WITH JAPANESE WALTZING MICE. 43 of a tortoise animal we should have an animal yellow-and-white in appearance, though gametically a pure tri-color (tortoise and white). This condition is found in guinea-pigs where two yellow (red) and white animals when crossed together have given young with black on the coat (Castle, 1912), and we know that one of these animals at least must have the gametic composition of a tri- color. In a case of this sort the yellow-and-white animals would occur in ratios entirely free from any mendelian principle, and would give a spurious reversal of dominance. Perhaps one of the two foregoing suggestions may serve to throw some light on the results upon which Galton's "law" of heredity was based. It must be remembered that tortoise-shell animals are in their gametic composition no more intermediates between black (extended) and yellow (restricted) animals than forms spotted with white are intermediate between colored forms and albinos. CROSSES WITH JAPANESE WALTZING MICE. Morgan (1911a) has mentioned the fact that in crosses between self and spotted forms, in mice, the spotting seemed modified or contaminated by the cross. He gives no figures, however, in support of this statement and fails to mention that the modification of spotted forms by crossing with self was reported by MacCurdy and Castle (1907). Dr. Castle and the writer have examined carefully the degree of pigmen- tation of a race of pure Japanese spotted mice and have estimated the percent- age of colored area on the dorsal surface; 72 animals were thus examined. The average pigmentation was 32 per cent. The range of pigmentation was from 20 to 55 per cent. Animals of this pure Japanese race were crossed with a uniform self-pigmented race of homozygous dilute brown animals, known to produce no spotted or albino young. Fx from these animals consisted of all self pigmented young showing no spots of white. Certain of these F\ animals were crossed inter se to obtain F2, others were crossed back with females of the pure Japanese race. In the first case F2 was found to consist of 45 self animals (no spots) and 21 animals having some white hairs or spots on the dorsal surface. The 3 to 1 ratio is here approximated, the exact theoretical expectation being 49.5 self to 16.5 spotted. The extracted spotted animals differ widely from the original Japanese race from which they inherited the spotted-coat character. A com- parison of the two categories of spotted forms (together with the back cross, which will be treated later) will be seen in the following table : No. of spotted individuals. Average percentage of dorsal surface pigmented. Range of in- dividuals in percentage of dorsal surface pigmented. (1) Japanese (2) Fo 72 21 47 19 32 85.3 60.2 70.4 20 to 55 50 to 99 40 to 99 47 to 85 (3) Back cross (4) Rack cross F->. . . 44 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. From this table it will he seen that the spotted individuals of Fa have been contaminate 1 by the cross, having their dorsal pigmentation increased on the average more than 50 per cent over the average of the pure Japanese race. The range of the spotted forms in F2 is also very different from that in the Japanese race. There are no F<> animals within 18 per cent of the average grade of the Japanese mice (32 per cent); also there is only one F2 animal out of 21 that is as lightly pigmented as the darkest of the Japanese race. The hack cross, between l\ animals and individuals from the pure Jap- anese race, we should expect to give spotted and self animals in a 1 : 1 ratio. The spotted animals, on a basis of contamination, should not be so extensively modified as in the F> animals; that is, their degree of dorsal pigmentation should be less. There have been 96 animals produced in this back cross, of which 49 are self and 47 spotted, showing that "spotting" and "self" are still behaving as a pair of allelomorphic characters. The spotted animals from this cross — see above table, (3) — show an average of 60.2 per cent of the dorsal surface pigmented; their range is from -40 to 9!) per cent. This coincides qualitatively with the expectation. One more cross may be recorded. Certain of the 49 selfs produced by the back cross were bred inter se, thus producing a generation which may be desig- nated as "back cross / br°wn Pink-eyed dilute yellow YBrBdpR Pink-eyed yellow YBrBDp AR Pink-eyed yellow YBrBDpR Pink-eyed yellow YBrDpAR Pink-eyed yellow YBrDpR Pink-eyed dilute yellow YBrdpAR Pink-eyed dilute yellow YBrdpR and yellow pigment 'Brown and yellow pig- k ment only Dark-eyed intense yel- low series Dark-eyed dilute yel- low series Pink-eyed intense yel- low series Pink-eyed dilute yellow series There are 32 pigmented varieties of mice which may be obtained in pure races. The "restricted series," however, may be obtained pure in the sense only that animals may be obtained which give merely the type of yellow written before their gametic formula, and the single variety of the "extended" series which the rest of their gametic constitution demands. Albino varieties corresponding with these 32 colored forms are expected to occur and may be produced at will. These albinos are distinguishable from one another only by breeding tests, and it is therefore doubtful whether ail the 32 varieties have as yet been isolated. *The factors T (total pigmentation) and S (self-pigmentation) are not included in these formula?. 50 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. In the following pages will be found a brief description of the various color varieties, as they appear to the unaided eye, followed by a list of crosses made with each color variety. In the tables it has been found expedient to use the following abbreviations to designate in simpler form the color varieties, a list of which has already been given: B = black, Br = brown, d = dilute, p = pink-eyed, A g = agouti, W = white (albino), Y = yellow, sY = sooty yellow, cY = cream yellow. Thus, for example, pdBAg is equivalent to pink-eyed dilute black agouti, color- variety No. 4 of the extended series. Unfortunately, in many of the crosses the numbers of animals recorded are small. Aberrations from the expected mendelian ratios of the color classes may also be found in some cases; but an examination of these seems to indicate that they would diminish with an increase in the number of animals recorded. EXTENDED SERIES. I. Black Agouti, YBrBDPA (Fig. 1). The common coloration seen in the house-mouse (Mas muscvlus). Eyes black, ears darkly pigmented, hairs on ventral surface tipped with dull-yellowish, then dark slaty to the base. Tail dark-pigmented. Dorsal hairs tipped with black, then having a yellow band and below that being slaty to their base. Such an arrangement produces the "ticked" or "agouti" coat pattern. Tuft of hairs at the base of the ears yellowish — a few light hairs on sides, flanks, and feet. Hairs around anus are light. Black agouiixblack agouli. Ckoss 1. Giving only BAg young; therefore one of the parents, at least, may be considered homozygous black agouti, type 1 (extended series). The animals used in this cross were descended from yellows. Mating. Parents. BAg. 74 64 82 1! 48 Itiiior 131 x 135 10(3 x 135 6 2 9 11 8 36 164 or 131 x unmarked. 139x530.045 509.42? x 530.07B Cross 2.] Parents heterozygous in black. Y:Bi JiDJ^AiX Y2Br2BD7 . . 3120 x unmarked 2 ! 3 1 1 1 5 4 1 1 1 Cross 9. Parents heterozygous in density, dark eye, and agouti. YzBr-iBiDdPpAx YtBnBzDdPpA . Expectation, 27 BAg, 9 pBAg, 9B,9 dBAg, 3 pdBAg, 3 dB, 3 pB, 1 pdB. Mating. Parents. BAg. dBAg. L'. \pBAg. pB. pdBAg. dB. pdB. 403 Unmarked x unmarked . 9 5 9 ! 1 1 2 Cross 10. Parents heterozygous in black, density, and dark eye. Y2Br-,BDdPpA2 X Y2Br2BDdPpA2. Expectation, 27 BAg, 9 pBAg, 9 BrAg, 9 dBAg, 3 pdBAg, 3 pi?r^4^, 3 dBrAg, 1 pdBrAg. Mating. Parents. BAg. dBAg. pBAg. BrAg. dBrAg. pdBAg. ' pBrAg. pdBrAg. p-? ? 338 \ 1290 x 1289 l'i't 1291x1289 203 1293x1289 241 1291 - 1293 X 1289 . . 275 1290-1291. 1293x1289 2G0 1539 x 1289 9 5 2 3 17 4 1 7 1 3 4 2 3 3 • • 5 1 2 4 2 1 o 2 2 1 .. 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 40 18 12 13 5 3 3 2 4 3 Cross 10a. Parents heterozygous in black, density, and agouti Y2Br2BDdP2A X Y2Br2BDdPtA . Expectation, 27 BAg, 9 dBAg, 9 BrAg, 9 B, 3 dflr.40, 3 d£, 3 jBr, 1 d£r. Mating. Parents. BAg. dBAg. BrAg. B. dBrAg. dB Br. -. A 2 A 7 .! 8 .lll» 56 x 55x58. S19 x S8 S18xS8 S98 x S5 7 o ■J 6 4 2 1 3 4 1 1 i i i 2 2 1 1 20 9 7 9 4 4 | 0 ! 2 Black agouti x dilute black agouti. Cross 11. Giving only BAg young, both parents homozygous. YJirJhU'iA,. YiBr.BzDiPtA , X Mating. Parents. BAg. 8 67 131 x 135. . EXTENDED SERIES. Cross 11 a. Black agouti heterozygous in 1 black agouti heterozygous in black and agouti. YJir-iBlJ'lP.A x YtBr* Expectation, 9 BAg, 9 dBAg, 3 BrAg, 3 dBrAg, 3 £, 3 PpA x Y2Br2D2p2. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 pBAg, 1 B, 1 pB. Mating. Parents. BAg. pBAg. B. pB. 398 3305xp3309. . :; 7 3 6 Black agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown. Cross 21a. Homozygous black agouti crossed with homozygous pink-eyed dilute brown. Y2Br2B2D2P2A2 x Y2Br2d2p2. Expectation, all BAg. Mating. Parents. BAg. 626 630 633 p. dil. 7854 7855 Br. x Vermont BAg . x Vermont BAg . x Vermont BAg . 26 9 7 42 Cross 21b. Black agouti heterozygous in black, density, and agouti crossed with homozy- gous pink-eyed dilute brown. Y2Br2BDdP2A x Y2Br2d2p2. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 BrAg, 1 B, 1 dBAg, 1 dBrAg, 1 Br, 1 dB, 1 dBr. Mating. Parents. BAg. BrAg. B. dBAg. dBrAg. Br. dB. dBr. 1 A3 599 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 2 Unmarked x unmarked . . . 4 1 3 4 4 4 2 1 II. Dilute Black Agouti, YBrBdPA (Fig. 2). Eyes black, ears moderately pigmented, ventral hairs light slate colored with a yellowish tinge. Tail moderately pigmented. Dorsal hairs showing the "agouti" pattern dis- tinctly but somewhat faded, or washed out in appearance. Tuft of light hairs present at base of the ears and around the anus. Dilute black agouti x dilute black agouti. Cross 22. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2B2d2P2A2. Expectation, all dBAg. Mating. Parents. dBAg. 621 7 ! 77 x unmarked .. . 12 Cross 22a. Both parents heterozygous in black, dark eye, and agouti. Y2Br2Bd2PpA. Expectation, 27 dBAg, 9 dB, 9 pdBAg, 9 dBrAg, 3 dBr, 3 pdB, 3 pdBrAg, 1 pdBr. Mating. Parents. dBAg. dBrAg. dB. pdBAg. pdBrAg. pdB. dBr. pBr. 629 642 7695 x 7690-91- 92 7694 x7690 9 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 9 2 2 3 2 1 1 0 EXTENDED SERIES. 57 Dilute black agouti, X black. Cross 22b. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous black. YvBriBidiPA xYiBr2B2D2P2. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 B. Mating. Parents. BAg. B. 6 562 6406x5881 ... 5 Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed black. Cross 23. Both parents homozygous. YJSriJSidiPiAi xY2Br2B2D2p2. Expectation, all BAg. Mating. Parents. BAg. 323 p845xl871.... 8 Cross 24. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in black, dark eye, and agouti crossed with pink-eyed black heterozygous in black. YSrSdiPpA xYzBrtBDipn. Expectation, 3 BAg, 3 £, 3 pBAg, 3 pB, 1 BrAg, 1 Br, 1 pBrAg, 1 pBr. Mating. Parents. BAg. B. BrAg. Br. pBAg. pB. pBrAg. pBr. 372 p2688x2488... 1 3 1 1 4 Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed dilute black. Cross 25. Both parents homozygous. YzBroBzdiPzAi xYiBriBd^. Expectation, all dBAg. Mating. Parents. dBAg. 410 p3627 X unmarked .... 5 Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed black agouti. Cross 26. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in dark eye, crossed with pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in density. YiBriBidzPpA* x Y-iBriBiDdpiA*. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 pBAg, 1 dBAg, 1 pdBAg. Mating. Parents. BAg. pBAg. dBAg. pdBAg. 368 2255 x pl775. . 1 1 .. Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed dilute black agouti. Cross 27. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in dark eye crossed with homozygous pink- eyed dilute black agouti. Y2Br2B2d2PpA2 x YoBriBzdtPiAi. Expectation, 1 dBAg, 1 pdBAg. Mating. Parents. dBAg. pdBAg. 522 386 560 p unmarked x unmarked. . 3 2 2254xp2339 1 4 p 4060 x 4244.... 2 6 6 58 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Dilute black agouti x broum. Cross 28. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous brown. YiBrtBtdsPtA x Y2Br2D2P2. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 B. .Mating. Parents. BAg. 90 It Unmarked x unmarked . . 3 B. 1 Dilute black agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown. Cross 28 a. Both parents homozygous. Y iBr2Bid2P2A2 xYiBrid.p*. Expectation, all dBAg. Mating. Parents. dBAg. 586 610 615 613 Unmarked x unmarked.. 7477 x 7476 7 8 8 11 7545 x 7503 Unmarked x unmarked.. 34 Cross 28b. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous pink-eyed dilute brown. Y2Br2Bid2P2A x Y2Br2d2p2. Expectation, 1 dBAg, 1 dB. Mating. Parents. dBAg. dB. 3 2 598 617 Unmarked x unmarked . . . Unmarked x unmarked . . . 4 4 8 5 Cross 28c. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in black crossed with homozygous pink-eyed dilute brown. Y2Br2Bd2P2A2 x Y2Br2d2p2. Expectation, 1 dBAg, 1 dBrAg. Mating. Parents. dBAg. dBrAg. 585 Unmarked X unmarked . . . 4 4 Cross 28d. Dilute black agouti heterozygous in black and agouti, crossed with homozygous pink-eyed dilute brown. Y2Br2Bd2P2A x Y2Br2d2p2. Expectation, 1 dBAg, 1 dB, 1 dBrAg, 1 dBr. Mating. Parents. dBAg. dB. dBrAg. dBr. 591 Unmarked x unmarked. . . . 3 1 EXTENDED SERIES. 59 III. Pink-eyed Black Agouti, YBBrDpA (Fig. 3). Eyes very deep pink. Ears apparently unpigmented. Hairs on ventral surface dull yellow with bluish base, showing the presence of the agouti pattern. Dorsal hair closely resembling that of the dark-eyed brown agouti form to the unaided eye. More yellow, however, seems to be present in the coat, though it has been seen that this is not because of an increased amount of yellow pigment. There is a tuft of light hairs at the base of the ears. The hairs directly around the anus, however, resemble the other ventral hairs so closely as to be indistinguishable from them. Pink-eyed black agouti x pink-eyed black agouti. Ckoss 29. One or both parents homozygous. YJiroBiDipoAi x Y-iBr.BiD-ipiAi. Expec- tation, all pBAg. Mating. Parents. 560 x 559 pBAg. 112 136 153 139 190 15 7 5 10 15 690 x 691 689 x 691 692 x 691 690-692 x 691 58 Ckoss 30. Both parents heterozygous in black. YzBriBDipiA? x Y-tBriBDipiA-i. Expecta- tion, 3 pBAg, 1 pBrAg. Mating. Parents. pBAg. pBrAg. 1 4 120 101 558 x 559 558 or 560 x 559 19 3 22 5 Cross 31. Both parents heterozygous in black, density, and agouti. YzBroBDdpzA x YiBnBDdptA. Expectation, 27 pBAg, 9 pdBAg, 9 pBrAg, 9 pB, 3 pdB, 3 pdBrAg, 3 pBr, 1 pdBr. Mating. Parents. pBAg. pdBAg. pBrAg. pB. pdBrAg. pdB. pBr. pdBr. 300 2018x2017.... 17 •_> 0 3 Pink-eyed black agouti x black. Cross 32. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous black. YjBnBiDiPtA xYzBrADoPi. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 B. Mating. Parents. BAg. B. 152 S3 416 X p409 163 x p412 1 2 2 3 o O 5 60 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Pink-eyed black agouti x pink-eyed blacl:. Cross 33. Both parents homozygous. Y?Br:B>D>p2A2 x Y.llrJiJ)ji.. ] Expectation, aWpBAg. Mating. Parenl pBAg. 171 171 pl049 < p898 p985xp898 4 j ' Cross 34. rink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in black and agouti crossed with pink-eyed black heterozygous in black. YtBrtBDzfiA x Y2Br2BD.p». Expectation, 3 pBAg, 3 pBrAg, 1 pB, 1 pBr. Mating. Parents. pBAg. pB. pBrAg. pBr. 84 p408xp412... 2 ! 2 1 !' ink-eyed black agouti X dilute black. Cross 35. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in density crossed with dilute black hetero- zygous in dark eye. YtBrzBiDdptAi xYiBr-iBidiPp. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 dBAg, 1 pBAg, 1 pdBAg. Matin-. Parents. BAg. dBAg. pBAg. V IBAg. 413 3062xpl922. ... 4 7 7 Pink-eyed black agouti x dilute brown agouti. Cross 36. Both parents homozygous. YaBrtBtDjipzAt x Y2Br2d1P1A2. Expectation, BAg only. Mating. Parents. BAg. Ms 682xp691... 15 Cross 37. Homozygous pink-eyed black agouti crossed with dilute brown agouti hetero- zygous in dark eye. YJBrJBzDzjhAi X YJSridJPpAi. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 pBAg. Mating. Parents. BAg. pBAg. 387 P unmarked x 1873 4 2 Cross 38. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in density and agouti crossed with dilute brown agouti heterozygous in agouti. YoBriBiDdjhA x Y2Br-2.dj.P2A. Expectation, 3 BAg, 3 dBAg, 1 B, 1 dB. Mating. Parent--. BAg. dBAg. B. dB. p!441 X4608.. 6 3 1 ' i EXTENDED SERIES. 61 Cross 39. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in black and density crossed with dilute brown agouti heterozygous in dark eye. Y^Br^BDdp'Ai x Y Jir^PpAi. Expecta- tion, 1 BAg, 1 pBAg, 1 dBAg, 1 BrAg, 1 pBrAg, 1 dBrAg, 1 pdBAg, 1 pdBrAg. Mating. Parents. \BAg. pBAg. dBAg. BrAg. pBrAg. dBrAg. p'lBAg. pdBrAg. 369 302 344 punmarked x 1873. . 7)1923-7^1874 x 1873. pl875 x 1873 10 . 13 1 15 1 4 5 2 2 5 4 i 24 15 5 9 ..541 Pink-eyed black agouti x brown. Cross 40. Both parents homozygous. YiBr^BiDip^jLiV^Y^Br^DiPi. Expectation, only BAg. Mating. Parents. BAg. 252 187 286 202 223 198 207 206 235 7)1416x1561 7)1125x1527 7)1533x1405 7)1396 x unmarked.. /)1368 X unmarked.. 7)1297 X unmarked.. 1403x?)1099 572x^1099 1403 x p691 5 S 8 5 5 2 6 16 59 Cross 41. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with homozygous brown. YiBrSiDiPiA x Y.Br.DoPi. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 B. Mating. Parents. BAg. B. 249 7)1326 x 1674 2 1 11 10 S 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 2 1 3 4 3 3 1 228 7)1062x1674.. 219 7)1060x1674 279 ?)1328 x 1561 193 7)1148x1527 209 7)1330x1404 213 1570x?)1120 181 646X7)1061 239 148Sx ?)844 227 Unmarked x unmarked. . 41 i 28 Cross 42. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in black and agouti crossed with homozy- gous brown. YiBr^BDiPiA xYoBriDiP*. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 B, 1 BrAg, 1 Br. Mating. Parents. BAg. B. BrAg. Br. 253 332 7)1443x1405.. 7)1972 x 2071 . . 1 4 2 1 2 2 4 3 3 2 62 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Cross 43. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with brown heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Br2B2D2p2A X Y2Br2D,Pp. Expectation, 1 BAg, IB, I pBAg, 1 pB . Mating. Parents. BAg. pBAg. B. pB. 182 181 231 1097 x 1526. . . 1098x1526. . . 1125x1526. . . 1 14 2 11 1 i 1 1 17 12 1 2 Cross 44. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in density crossed with brown heterozygous in density. YzBrJSiDdjhAi x Y2Br2DdP2. Expectation, 3 BAg, 1 dBAg. Mating. Parents. BAg. dBAg. ."IS 2179 x 1922. . . 4 2 Cross 45. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in black, density, and agouti crossed with brown heterozygous in density. Y2Br2BDdp2A x Y2Br2DdP2. Expectation, 3 BAg, 3 BrAg, 3B,3 Br, 1 dBAg, 1 dBrAg, 1 dB, 1 dBr. Mating. Parents. BAg. BrAg. B. Br. dBAg. dBrAg. dB. dBr. 229 1710x1405. . . 6 4 1 1 ■■ Cross 46. Pink-eyed black agouti heterozygous in density and agouti, crossed with brown heterozygous in density. Y2Br2B2Ddp2A x Y2Br2DdP2. Expectation, 3 BAg, 3 B, 1 dBAg, 1 dB. Mating. Parents. BAg. dBAg. B. dB. 317 221 291 1326x1401 1332 x 1404 1326-32x1404.. 5 3 1 2 2 4 4 2 1 9 4 8 3 IV. Pink-eyed Dilute Black Agouti, YBBrdpA (Fig. 4). Eyes pink; ears, feet, and tail apparently unpigmented. The color of the coat is markedly washed-out in quality. The agouti pattern is distinguishable, but not easily so, because of the "streaky" due to the absence of intense pigmentation. The whole coat resembles a little that of a very light dilute dark-eyed brown agouti. The ear tufts of yellowish hair are prominent. There are no crosses to be included under this variety, though some in which one parent is pink-eyed dilute black agouti have been recorded under the preceding varieties. V. Brown Agouti, YBrDPA (Fig. 5). Eyes a deep rich brown, ears brown pigmented. Hairs on ventral surface yellowish on tip, dull brown at base. Tail brown pigmented. Dorsal hairs brown at the tip, then a yellow band, and finally dull brown to the base, giving the unmistakable "ticked" or "agouti" coat. Whiskers and feet are brown. Light hairs around the anus and at the base of the ears. EXTENDED SERIES. 63 Brown agouti x brown agouti. Cross 47. One or both parents homozygous. YiBrtDtPiA* x YJBriDiPiAi. Expectation, all brown agouti. Mating. 124 86 143 414 Parents. BrAg. 651 x 272 6 is 6 7 367x272 281 x272 Unmarked x unmarked. . . . 37 Cross 48. Both parents heterozygous in agouti. Y2Br2D2P2A x Y2Br2D2P2A. Expecta- tion, 3 BrAg, 1 Br. Mating. Parents. BrAg. Br. 104 586x588 3 1 Cross 49. Both parents heterozygous in density and the color factor. YB^DdPiAi x YBr2DdP2A2. Expectation, 9 BrAg, 3 dBrAg, 4 W. Mating. Parents. 89 511.1.-1x411. BrAg. dBrAg. W. 2 2 3 Cross 49a. Both parents heterozygous in density, dark eye, and agouti. Y2Br2DdPpA. Expectation, 27 BrAg, 9 dBrAg, 9 pBrAg, 9 Br, 3 pBr, 3 pdBrAg, 3 dBr, 1 pdBr. Mating. Parents. BrAg. dBrAg. plirAg. Br. dBr. pBr. pdBrAg. pdBr. 631 643 644 7679 x 7678-80 .... 7663x7660 7664 x 7662 6 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 10 1 4 3 3 l ..:..] .. Broxon agouti x pink-eyed brown agouti. Cross 50. Brown agouti heterozygous in dark-eye, color factor, and agouti crossed with pink-eyed brown agouti heterozygous in the color factor and agouti. YBr2D2PpA x YBr2D2p2A. Expectation, 9 BrAg, 9 pBrAg, 3 Br, 3 pBr, 8 W. Mating. Parents. BrAg. Br. pBrAg.l pBr. 11'. 1 407 p unmarked x 2735 .... 365 p2137 x 2735 350 /J2138 x 2735 8 4 1 1 to to to 2 3 1 1 8 6 6 2 5 64 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IX MICE. Brown agouti x brawn. Cross 51. Homozygous brown agouti crossed with homozygous brown YJSrtDtPtAt x Y>BrJhl'2. Expectation, all BrAg. Mutiny. 96 Parents. 4SS x 102 . . . BrAg. Cross 52. Brown agouti heterozygous in dark eye and agouti crossed with brown heterozy- gous in dark eye }' J',iJ)4' pA xY^Br-iDsPp. Expectation, 3 BrAg, ■'> Br, 1 pBrAg, 1 pBr. Mating. Parents. BrAg. Br. pBrAg. pBr. 405 305 Unmarked x unmarked. 2129 X2130 G 4 3 9 6 1 5 4 i 3 347 Unmarked x 2130 10 18 10 5 Brown agouti x pink-eyed brown. Cross 53. Both parents homozygous. YiBrzDiPzAz X YzBr%Dtp« Mating. Parents. BrAg. p2309x2131.. 4 Expectation, all BrAg Brown agouti x dilute black. Cross 54. Brown agouti heterozygous in density and agouti, crossed with dilute black heterozygous in black. YtBnDdPzA x Y^r%Ba\Pz. Expectation, 1 BAg, 1 dBAg, 1 B, 1 dB, 1 BrAg, 1 dBrAg, 1 Br, 1 dBr. Mating. Parent-. BAg. dBAg. BrAg. dBrAg. B. Br. dB. dBr. 527 .. _ 5381 x 5203 . . . o 3 1 1 i—i Brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown. Cross 54a. Both parents homozygous, YzBr.DiPoAo x Y2Br.>d>p>. Expectation, all BrAg. Mating. Parents. BrAg. 595 603 Unmarked x unmarked. . . . 19 7505 x 7501 7 26 VI. Dilute Brown Agouti, YBrdPA (Fig. 6). Eyes browrn; cars, feet, and tail lightly pigmented with brown. Ventral hairs dull fawn Dorsal hairs showing the agout i pattern. The whole appearance is thatof aduil, faded, intense brown agouti. EXTENDED SERIES. 65 Dilute brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown agouti. Cros3 55. Dilute brown agouti heterozygous in dark eye crossed with homozygous pink- eyed dilute brown agouti, or pink-eyed dilute brown. Y>Br2D>PpA2 x Y2Br 2d2p2{A2) . Expectation, 1 dBrAg, 1 pdBrAg. Mating. 642a Parents. dBrAg. u 1 pdBrAg. 3430 x p 1.519.... 2 ; 13 12 Dilute brown agouti x brown. Cross 56. Dilute brown agouti heterozygous in dark eye and agouti crossed with brown heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Br2d2PpA x YiBr>D>Pp. Expectation, 3 BrAg, 3 Br, 1 pBrAg, 1 pBr. Mating. Parents. BrAg. Br. pBrAg. pBr. 428 3439x3739. . . . 12 7 1 2 VII. Pink-Eyed Brown Agouti, YBrDpA (Fig. 7). Eyes clear pink; ears apparently unpigmented, as are also feet and tail. Hairs on ventral surface indistinguishable superficially from a deep pink-eyed yellow. When examined more closely they are found to be darker at the base than at the tip, showing the pres- ence of the agouti pattern. Dorsal hair a very rich brownish yellow and deeper colored at the base with dull brownish pigment. Because of the reduction of brown pigment at the tips of the hairs the appearance of banding or " ticking" is almost entirely wanting. Whiskers, hairs at base of ears, and around the anus are yellow. Pink-eyed brown agouti X pink-eyed brown agouti. Cross 57. Both parents heterozygous in agouti. Y2Br2D2p2A x Y2Br2D,p2A. Expectation, 3 pBrAg, 1 pBr. Mating. Parents. pBrAg. pBr. 419 399 p unmarked x p2903 p3109xp2903 G 4 1 1 10 o Cross 58. Both parents heterozygous in density and agouti. Y2Br2Ddp2A xY2Br2Ddp2A. Expectation, 9 pBrAg, 3 pBr, 3 pdBrAg, 1 pdBr. Mating. Parents. pBrAg. pBr. pdBrAg. pdBr. 400 7>2904 x p2903 . . 2 1 2 1 66 •II IK I.NHKKITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Pink-eyed brown agouti x broiim. Cross 59. Both parents homozygous. F2/ir2D2/»2/l 2 X Y2BriD2P2. Expectation, BrAg only. Mating. Parents. BrAg. 300 /> unmarked x2393... . Cross 60. Homozygous pink-eyed brown agouti crossed with brown heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Br2D2p2A2 X Y%BrtDJPp. Expectation, 1 BrAg, 1 pBrAg. Mating. Parents. BrAg. pBrAg. 261 />13f)5x 1520 0 4 VIII. Pink-eyed Dilute Brown Agouti, YBrdpA (Fig. 8). Eyes pink; ears, tail, and feet very lightly pigmented with brown. In both ventral and dorsal hairs this form resembles a dull intense pink-eyed brown agouti, differing chiefly in the comparative lack of bright yellow pigment and in the mealy, washed-out look. The agouti pattern is very weak indeed. Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti x pink-eyed dilute brown ago\di. Cross 61. Both parents heterozygous in agouti. Y2Br2d2p2A xY2Br2d2piA. Expectation, 3 pdBrAg, 1 pdBr. Mating. Parents. pdBrAg. pdBr. p? 3 479 535 Unmarked x p4519 . . p4213xp4519 1 1 2 2 2 3 Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti X dilute broicn. Cross 61a. Pink-eyed dilute brown agouti heterozygous in agouti crossed with dilute brown heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Br2d2p2A x Y2Br2d2Pp. Expectation, 1 dBrAg, 1 dBr, 1 pdBrAg, 1 pdBr. Mat ing. Parents. Unmarked x unmarked . 7471 x7468 dBrAg. ilBr. pdBrAg. pdBr. 590 005 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 3 3 3 3 Cross 61b. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2d2p2A2 xY2Br2d2Pi. Expectation, all dBrAg. Mating. Parents. dBrAg. 609 1'n marked x unmarked. 2 E XTEN DE D SE RIE S . G7 IX. Black, YBrBDP (Fig. 9). Hairs on ventral surface not so heavily pigmented as the dorsal hairs, and of a dull slaty black. Tail dark. Dorsal hairs deep, glossy black. Tuft of yellowish hairs at base of ears. A few yellowish hairs scattered along the flanks, sides and feet. The hairs around the anus are light yellowish. The feet are dark. Black x black. Cross 62. One or both of the parents homozygous. Y2Br2B2D2P2 x Y2Br2B2D2P2. Expec- tation, all B. Mating. Parents. B. 2 2 3 1 401 x400.. . G 200x201... 4 Cross 63. Both parents heterozygous in black. Y2Br2BD2P2 x YiBrtBD.P*. Expecta- tion, 3B, 1 Br. Mating. Parents. \ B. Br 1x400.. 6 2 Cross 64. Both parents heterozygous in density. YoBriBtDdP: x Y2BrzB2DdP2. Expec- tation, 3 B, 1 dB. Matins. Parents. ( B. dB. o/ / 7214x7217... 3 3 Cross 65. Both parents heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Br2B2D2Pp x YiBnBiDiPp. Expec- tation, 3 B, 1 pB. Mating. Parents. B. pi:. 492 168 189 114 131 13.3 379 Unmarked x 2948 3 455x919 12 450x540 6 Unmarked x 454 12 543x444 2 450 x 444 7 Unmarked x unmarked ... 60 102 1 I ■i 1 1 1 20 30 68 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Cross 66. Both parents heterozygous in dark eye and black. Y2Br2BD2Pp x Y2Br2BD2Pp. Expectation, 9 B, 3 pB, 3 Br, 1 pBr. Mating. 361 376a 3766 247 318 316 267 364 303 295 ' 349 334 358 333 444 336 447 Parents. />'. pB. Br 2596x2593 2 Unmarked x unmarked. . . 78 Unmarked X unmarked. . . 13 1706 X 541 2 2031x1942 8 1948x1950 5 1948x1949-1950 3 20S4X20S6 2 2084-2085x2086 11 2186-87-88-89x2184 31 2212x2213 7 2218 x 2213 6 2210x2219 4 2210-14x2219 15 2216x2219 : 4 Unmarked x 2593 7 2945 x unmarked 1 199 1 26 7 1 2 4 3 16 4 5 *2 2 1 1 75 23 5 '4 2 1 2 3 6 2 2 1 6 3 1 61 pBr. 5 2 1 1 4 1 3 19 p? Cross 66a. Both parents heterozygous in black, dark eye, and density. Y2Br2BDdPp. Expectation, 27 B, 9 dB, 9 pB, 9 Br, 3 pBr, 3 dBr, 3 pdB, 1 pdBr. Mating. Parents. B. dB. pB. Br. pdB. pBr. dBr. pdBr. 619 645 646 7515x7513-14-16.. 7431 X7514 7733 x 7734 4 3 3 2 6 2 2 1 1 . . 10 2 6 4 2 Cross 66b. Both parents heterozygous in color factor, black, dark eye, and density. YBr2BDdPp. Expectation, 81 B, 27 dB, 27 pB, 27 Br, 9 pBr, 9 dBr, 9 pdB, 3 pdBr, 64 W. Mating. Parents. B. Br. W. 625 7430x7428.... 5 5 3 Black x dilute black. Cross 67. Both parents homozygous, Y2Br2B2D2P2 x Y2Br2B2d2P2. Expectation, all B. Mating. Parents. B. 2 552 4865x5789.. EXTENDED SERIES. 69 Cross CS. Both parents heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Br2B,l)J' /> x YtBnB/JJ'p. E>. ;.<<■- tation, 3 B, 1 pB. _ Mating. Parent: B. pB. 197 1363 x 1435. ! 1 Black X pink-eyed black. Cross 69. Both parents homozygous. YJir^J)^ X YiBrJlJ).^. Expectation, all B. Mating. 306 Parents. 1695X//1510.. 16 Cross 70. Black heterozygous in dark eye crossed with homozygous pink-eyed black. YLBrJl_D2Pp x Y2Br2B2D2p2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 pB. Mating. Pan nts. B. pB. 548 571 221 1 Unmarked / p557o , , . 3290-96 ■ p5575 1363 x p763 13 6 7 1 1 8 26 10 Black x brown. Cross 71. Both parents homozygous. YJSriBiDiPz x Y2Br2D2P2. Expectation, all B. Mating. Parent.-:. B. 474 Unmarked x 68.. 4 Cross 72. Black heterozygous iu black crossed with homozygous brown. Y2Br2BD2P2 X Y2Br2D2P2. Expectation, 1B,1 Br. Mating. Parents. B. Br. 308 383 262 396 1631 X1950 1931 X1950 1931 / 1949-50... 2523 x2122 20 15 7 5 10 5 14 10 5 1 35 Cross 73. Black, heterozygous in black, dark eye, and the color factor crossed with pink- eyed black heterozygous in the color factor and black. YBr2BD2Pp x YBr2BD2p2. Expectation, 9 B, 9 pB, 3 Br, 3 pBr, 8 W. Mating. Parents. B. pB. Br. pBr.\ W 420 Unmarked x 3307... 3 2 70 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Black x pink-eyed brown. Cross 74. Black heterozygous in dark eye crossed with homozygous pink-eyed brown. Y2Br2B2D2Pp x Y2Br2D2p2. Expectation, IB, 1 pB. Mating. Parents. B. pB. 475 p unmarked x 68. . . 1 4 Cross 75. Black heterozygous in dark eye and black crossed with homozygous pink-eyed brown. Y2Br2BD2Pp x Y2Br2D2p2. Expectation, 1B,1 pB, 1 Br, 1 pBr. Mating. Parents. B. pB. Br. pBr. 493 140x77... 2 1 2 Black x pink-eyed dilute brown. Cross 75a. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2B2D2P2 x Y2Br2d2p2. Expectation, all B. Mating. Parents. B. 18 4 22 582 589 7340 x 7341 Unmarked X unmarked. . . Cross 75b. Black heterozygous in dark eye, crossed with homozygous pink-eyed dilute brown. Y2Br2B2D2Pp x Y2Br2d2p2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 pB. Mating. Parents. B. pB. 620 7472x7475... 5 11 X. Dilute Black, YBrBdP (Fig. 10). Eyes black; ears, tail, and feet moderately pigmented. Ventral hairs slate-colored. Dorsal hairs are deep blue slate, somewhat washed-out, and at times resembling a very deep- colored dilute black agouti. There is a small tuft of light hairs at the base of the ears. Light yellowish hairs scattered on sides and feet, and around the anus. Unlike the pink-eyed black form next to be described, one would not hesitate in calling the dilute black animal, black pigmented. Dilute black x dilute black. Cross 76. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2B2d2P2 x Y2Br2B2d>P2. Expectation, all dB. Muting. Parents. dB. 549 457 442 Unmarked x 4980. . 4502-03 X 4497 4502 x 4497 15 10 5 30 EXTENDED SERIES. 71 Cross 77. Both parents heterozygous in the color factor, black and dark eye. YBr2Bd2Pp xYBrMPp. Expectation, 27 dB, 9 dBr, 9 pdB, 3 pdBr, 16 W. Mating. Parents. dB. dBr. 1 1 2 pdB. pdBr. w. 2 542 511 550 5698 x 5699 2 3 6 1 4 1 1 Unmarked x unmarked. . . Unmarked x 5699 11 4 5 2 2 Dilute black X pink-eyed block. Cross 78. Dilute black heterozygous in dark eye crossed with homozygous pink-eyed black. Y2Br1B2fiiPp x YtBnBoD.pi. Expectation, 15, 1 pB. Mating. Parents. B. pB. 3 2 1 337 /;1049 x 1435 Unmarked x 1435. . 2 4 Cross 79. Dilute black heterozygous in black crossed with pink-eyed black heterozygous in density and black. Y-iBrSdiPi x YoBr2BDdp;. Expectation, SB, 3 dB, 1 Br,ldBr. Mating. Parents. B. Br. dB. dBr. 528 p4520x4523.... 1 2 2 Dilute black x brown. Cross 80. Dilute black heterozygous in black, crossed with homozygous brown. YiBriBdiPo x YiBroDoP,. Expectation, 1 B, 1 Br. Mating. Parents. B. Br. 441 2563-64-89x4495.. IS 17 Cross 81. Dilute black heterozygous in black crossed with brown heterozygous in density YiBnBdiPi X Y2Br2DdPz. Expectation, 1 B, 1 Br, 1 dB, 1 dBr. Mating. Parents. B. Br. 2 dB. 1 dBr. 451 437 4501 x 4857 1 4501 x 1404 3 2 4 2 1 2 72 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Dilute black x pink-eyed brown. Cross 82. Dilute black heterozygous in black crossed with homozygous pink-eyed brown . YJU-2Bd2P2 X Y2Br2D2p2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 Br. Mating. Parents. B. 3 Br. 2 557 Unmarked x p5806 Cross 82a. Homozygous dilute black crossed with pink-eyed brown, heterozygous in density. Y2Br2B2d2P2 X Y2Br2Ddp2. Expectation, IB, IdB. Mating. Parents. B. 7 1 dB. 5 3 593 612 Unmarked X -7 -8 X unmarked 8 8 Cross S3. Dilute black heterozygous in dark eye crossed with pink-eyed brown heterozy- gous in density. Y2Br2B2d2Pp x Y2Br2Ddp2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 pB, 1 dB, 1 pdB. 1 Mating. Parents. B. pB. dB. pdB. 503 4078xp429S... 2 4 XI. Pink-eyed Black, YBrBDp (Fig. 11). Eyes deep pink; ears very lightly pigmented. Hairs on ventral surface light yellowish-gray. Tail lightly pigmented. Dorsal hairs varying from a very light yellowish slate color to a deep lilac. The tufts of light hairs back of the ears are present. No appearance of black pigment in the dorsal hairs, to the unaided eye. The nose whiskers are light, almost yellow. The whole appearance resembles somewhat the dark-eyed dilute brown, The feet are slightly pigmented and the hairs around the anus are light. Pink-eyed black x pink-eyed black. Cross 84. Both parents heterozygous in black. Y2Br2BD2p2 x Y2Br2BD2p2. Expectation, 3 pB, 1 pBr. Mating. Parents. pB. 2 6 10 pBr. 172 342 313 p8 15 x p763 julS12 x 1764 1421-1812x1764.. 2 ! 6 18 9 Pink-eyed black x brown. Cross So. Both parents heterozygous in the color factor. YBr2B2D2p2x YBr2D2P2. Expec- tation, 3 B, 1 W. Mating. Parents. B. 356 2178x2175.. 4 W. EXTENDED SERIES. 73 Cross 86. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2B2D2p2 x Y2Br2D2P2. Expectation, all B. Mating. Parents. B. 224 1717x1512 13 211 1049x1630 2 230 1042x1630 4 215 985x1630 14 234 1638-40x1610.... 12 270 1721 X1609 9 296 1765x1603 3 282 1608x1603 3 281 845x1603 6 196 Unmarked xl603. 7 243 1641 X1194 4 236 1520x1194 9 246 Unmarked x 1194. 14 205 1524x1192 12 381 1524x2175 3 115 Cross 87. Pink-eyed black heterozygous in black crossed with homozygous brown. Y2Br2BD2p2 x Y2Br2D2P2. Expectation, 1B,1 Br. Mating. Parents. B. Br. 274 258 245 266 280 Unmarked x 1764 1642x1764 3 2 2 2 3 5 1 3 572 x 1394 -16x1394 1421 x unmarked .... > 2 3 11 15 Cross 88. Pink-eyed black heterozygous in the color factor and black crossed with brown heterozygous in color factor. YBr2BD2p2 X YBr2D2P2. Expectation, W, 3 Br, 2 W. Mating. Parents. B. Br. W. 269 1812x1661. Cross 89. Pink-eyed black heterozygous in black crossed with brown heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Br2BD2p2 x Y2Br2D2Pp. Expectation, 1 B, 1 pB, 1 Br, 1 pBr. Mating. Parents.' B. pB. Br. pBr. 257 1714x1526 2 4 2 4 Pink-eyed black x dilute brown. Cross 89a. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2B2D2v2 x Y2Br2d2P2. Expectation, all B. Mating, i Parents. B. 648 Unmarked x 318... 19 7-4 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Pink-eyed black x pink-eyed brown. Cross 90. Both parents homozygous. YiBr^B^D^pi x Y«BrzD->p2. Expectation, all pB. Mating. Parents. pB. 634 7804x7806... 4 Cross 90a. Pink-eyed black heterozygous in black, crossed with homozygous pink-eyed brown. YiBriBD2p2 x Y2Br>D2p2. Expectation, 1 pB, 1 pBr. Mating. Parents. pB. pBr. 558 638 640 5721x5806... 7807x7803... 7809x7803... 1 4 4 2 5 5 9 12 XII. Pink-eyed Dilute Black, YBrBdp (Fig. 12). Eyes pink; ears, tail and feet extremely lightly pigmented. Coat clearly washed out in appearance, and a real bluish lilac, at times almost silvery. This variety is very characteristic, and is one which, when obtained, is easy to recognize. No one would, without breeding tests, class this form as possessing black pigment. Pink-eyed dilute black x brown. Cross 91. Homozygous pink-eyed dilute black crossed with brown, heterozygous in density. YiBr2Bii2p2 x Y2Br2DdP2. Expectation, 1 B, 1 dB. Mating. Parents. B. 11 1 dB. 449 594 3627x1404.. 19x17.... 9 4 12 13 Pink-eyed dilute black x dilute brown. Cross 91a. Pink-eyed dilute black heterozygous in black crossed with dilute brown hetero- zygous in dark eye. Y2Br2Bd,p2 x YzBrxhPp. Expectation, 1 dB, 1 dBr, 1 pdB, 1 pdBr. Mating. Parents. dB. dBr. pdB. pdBr. 604 7462 x 7461 2 3 2 EXTENDED SERIES. 75 XIII. Brown, YBrDP (Fig. 13). Eyes deep brown; ears and tail brown pigmented. Hairs on the ventral surface are lighter than those on the dorsal surface, and are dull dirty brown. Dorsal hairs deep, glossy brown; lighter yellowish hairs occur, as in the black variety, at the base of the ears, scattered on the flanks, sides, and feet, as well as around the anus. The skin is brown pigmented. Brown x brown. Cross 92. One or both parents homozygous. Y2Br2D2P2 x Y2Br2D2P2. Expectation, only Br. Mating. Parents. Br. 348 345 525 Unmarked x 2291 . . Unmarked x 2386. . 5942x5340 5 16 5 26 Cross 93. Both parents heterozygous for the color factor. YBr2D2P2 X YBr2D2P2. Expec- tation, 3 Br, 1 W. Mating. Parents. Br. w. 551 Unmarked x 32 . . . 388 2365x2374 504 4859x4298 575 6225-27x6226.... 4 4 11 11 2 2 2 3 30 9 Cross 94. Both parents heterozygous in dark eye. Y2Br2D2Pp x Y2Br2D2Pp. Expecta- tion, 3 Br, 1 pBr. Mating. Parents. Br. pBr. 406 40S Unmarked x unmarked.. . Unmarked X unmarked.. . 9 22 3 7 31 10 Cross 95. Both parents heterozygous in dark eye and the color factor. YBr2D2Pp x YBr2D2Pp. Expectation, 9 Br, 3 pBr, 4 W. Mating. Parents. Br. pBr. W. 408 360 Unmarked x unmarked. Unmarked X 2392 22 15 7 4 2 3 37 11 5 76 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Cross 96. Both parents heterozygous in density and dark eye. Y2Br>DdPp x Y2Br2DdPp. Expectation, 9 Br, 3 dBr, 3 pBr, 1 pdBr. Mating. Parents. Br. dBr. pBr. pdBr. 4! Hi 569 521 581 632 635 I Inmarked x unmarked Unmarked x4736 473.") x 4736 40 3 6 15 11 6 16 2 1 3 2 1 8 4 1 2 I 1 1 Unmarked x unmarked. . 7597 x 7601-02 7439 x 7437a 38 81 35 8 3 Brown x pink-eyed brown. Cross 97. Brown heteroz3'gous in density, dark eye and the color factor, crossed with pink- eyed brown heterozygous in density and the color factor. YBr2DdPp x YBr2Ddp2. Expectation, 9 Br, 9 pBr, 3 dBr, 3 pdBr, 8 W. Mating. Parents. Br. dBr. j>I>r. pdBr. W. 538 -35x32... 3 .. i 1 3 Brown x pink-eyed dilute brown. Cross 97a. Both parents homozygous. Y2Br2D2P2 x Y2Br2d2p2. Expectation, all Br. Mating. Parents. Br. 583 Unmarked x unmarked 13 Cross 97b. Brown heterozygous in density crossed with homozygous pink-eyed dilute brown. Y2Br2DdP2 x Y2Br2d2p2. Expectation, 1 Br, 1 dBr. Mating. Parents. Br. dBr. 584 Unmarked x unmarked 3 2 XIV. Dilute Brown, YBrdP (Fig. 14). Eyes brown; ears, tail and feet, as in the dilute brown agouti, are lightly pigmented with brown. Ventral hairs pale fawn. Dorsal hairs dull, washed-out brown, at times resembling a dark, pink-eyed black in general superficial coloration. Ear tufts barely distinguishable from the rest of the coat. The skin is moderately pigmented with brown. Dilute brown x pink-eyed brown. Cross 98. Both parents homozygous. YiBr2d2Pt x Y2Br2D2p2. Expectation, all Br. Mating. 495 504 Parents. Br. 4446 x -77.. 4859x4208.. 13 11 24 EXTENDED SERIES. 77 Cross 98a. Dilute brown heterozygous in dark eye, crossed with pink-eyed brown heterozy- gous in density. Y2Br2d2Pp X Y2Br2Ddp2. Expectation, 1 Br, 1 dBr, 1 pBr, 1 pdBr. Mating. Parents. Br. dBr. pBr. pdBr. 608 7479x7478. . . 3 1 1 o XV. Pink-Eyed Brown, YBrDp (Fig. 15). Eyes clear pink. Ears, tail, and feet unpigmented. Hairs on ventral surface dull yellowish throughout their length. The yellow hairs at the base of the ears and around the anus are very similar to the rest of the coat, but are, nevertheless, distinguishable from it. The dorsal hairs are rich fawn colored, lighter than the coat of the pink-eyed brown agouti. Pink-eyed brown x pink-eyed brown. Cross 99. One or both of the parents homozygous. Y-J3rJ)tfh X Y»Br2D,p2. Expectation, only pBr. Mating. Parents. pBr. 391 390 377 426 524 Unmarked x 3002.. Unmarked x 2821. . 2799x3002 3310x3309 24 10 3 7 11 5805x5045 55 Pink-eyed brown x albino. (Test matings to determine the gametic constitution of the albinos.) Cross 100. Pink-eyed brown heterozygous in the color factor crossed with an albino, poten- tially a homozygous brown agouti. YBr2D2p2 X Br2D2P2A2. Expectation, 1 BrAg, 1 W Mating. Parents. BrAg. W. 487 5245x4984.. 4 6 Cross 101. Pink-eyed brown heterozygous in the color factor, crossed with an albino, poten- tially a homozygous brown. YBr2D,p2 x Br2D2P2. Expectation, 1 Br, 1 W. Mating. Parents. Br. W. ? 509 4082x4280.... 13 2 4 XVI. Pink-eyed Dilute Brown, YBrdp (Fig. 16). Eyes clear pink. Very pale pigmentation throughout hairs and skin, a close approximation to a dirty brownish cream but still preserving the streaky washed-out appearance clearly. This form is as characteristic and easily distinguished as the pink-eyed dilute black. The ear tufts are indistinguishable from the rest of the coat. Pink-eyed dilute browns crossed inter se have given 120 recorded young, all pink-eyed dilute brown. It must be remembered that all these descriptions of color varieties are intended to be merely as they appear to the unaided eye. Many of the regions here spoken of as pink or unpigmented have, upon microscopic examination, yielded a small amount of pigment. 7S THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. RESTRICTED SERIES. All animals in this series, that is to say, all yellow animals, are of the zygotic formula Rr. The combination RR, if formed, fails to develop. (a) Dark-eyed intense series. This series consists of four types of yellows: XVII. Black-eyed Yellow Carrying Agouti, YBrBDPAR (Fig. 20). XVIII. Black-eyed Yellow Without Agouti, YBrBDPR (Fig. 17). XIX. Brown-eyed Yellow Carrying Agouti, YBrDPAR. XX. Brown-eyed Yellow Without Agouti, YBrDPR (Fig. 18). Types XVII and XVII arc similar in appearance, and are indistinguishable save by breed- ing tests. Types X I X and XX also are only to be distinguished from each other by suitable test matings. (6) Pink-eyed intense series. This series consists of four types of yellow which are indistinguishable in external appearance : XXI. Pink-eyed Yellow Carrying Black Agouti, YBrBDpAR. XXII. Pink-eyed Yellow Carrying Black, YBrBDpR. XXIII. Pink-eyed Yellow Carrying Brown Agouti, YBrDpAR. XXIV. Pink-eyed Yellow Carrying Brown, YBrDpR. Test matings are necessary before these forms can be distinguished from each other. (c) Dark-eyed dilute series. In this series also there are four types: XXV. Black-eyed Dilute Yellow Carrying Agouti, YBrBdPAR. XXVI. Black-eyed Dilute Yellow Without Agouti, YBrBdPR. XXVII. Brown-eyed Dilute Yellow Carrying Agouti, YBrdPAR. XXVIII. Brown-eyed Dilute Yellow Without Agouti, YBrdPR (Fig. 19). In this series types XXV and XXVI are distinguishable from types XXVII and XXVIII by a careful examination of the eyes. Such a test, however, is not certain enough to be considered final, and a breeding test forms the only sure basis for a permanent classification. (d) Pink-eyed dilute series. As in the pink-eyed intense series the four forms of this series are indistinguishable save by breeding tests. This is because of the fact that the total amount of pigment hi the rye is so small that it is impossible to determine whether it is brown or black by any- thing short of a microscopic examination. The gametic formula; follow: XXIX. Pink-eyed Dilute Yellow Carrying Black Agouti, YBrBdpAR. XXX. Pink-eyed Dilute Yellow Carrying Black, YBrBdpR. XXXI. Pink-eyed Dilute Yellow Carrying Brown Agouti, YBrdpAR. XXXII. Pink-eyed Dilute Yellow Carrying Brown, YBrdpR. Each of these series may now be considered separately. Up to a certain point there were no pink-eyed or dilute mice, yellow or non-yellow in my stock. All the yellows were therefore intense dark-eyed yellows and would group them- selves under one of the first four types (XVII, XVIII, XIX, or XX). To test them a cross with any type of brown animal lacking the agouti factor would suffice. A list of such crosses follows. Yellows which proved to be of type XVII are included in the following table: RESTRICTED si-;;; IKS. 79 Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. Zvl'oi ic formula of yellow parent. 29 700-702 br. x 508 yel . . 34 7(17 br. x 502.4 A vel... 36 502.2A vel. xbr." 2 6 1 5 2 3 Y-Ji. ■■■B-I»..P A R. Y1Brli.I)lp.,.\,R. YJir.Ji-.lhP ',1 R. 9 10 All these yellows seem to have been homozygous in the factors for black and for agouti. Yellows of type XIX follow: Mating. Parents. Y. Br An. Br. Zygol ic formula of yellow parent. 15-111-85 18-19 56 82 146 yel. x brown. . br. x 571 vel br. x 148 yel 502. IP, yel. xbr... 12 1 2 2 ? l 1 :: 3 2 YJ3rJJJ\AR. YJirJ)P.,A»R. YJirl) ■■!'■. A .,R. YJirJ)P,AR. 17 17 3 There are two types of zygotes here, those homozygous in the agouti pattern (A) and those heterozygous, the latter giving non-agouti, as well as agouti young. The yellows of type XVIII are also of two sorts, those homozygous in the factor for the production of black (B) and those heterozygous in this factor. Thus in the following table 502. 2L4 yellow is known to be an animal homozygous in the factor B, while all the other yellow animals are heterozygous, producing browns as well as blacks. Mating. Parents. 63 502.21 A yel. xbr. 1 1 br. x 505 yel 37 502. 22 A yel. xbr. 92 br. x 228 yel 100 320 vel. xbr 320 2320 vel. xbr. .. ! Y. B. Br. 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 10 9 6 Zygotic formula of yellow parent. YJhJi1D.P..R. YJirJ;l).p.,R. YJirJWJ.R. Y2Br2BD2P«R. Y-.Br.BDJhR. Y-JirJiD I'R. Type XX, yellows which give browns only, are seen in the following table: Yellow x brown. Mating. Parents. Y. Br. Zygotic formula of yellow parent. 62 232 293 329 331 304-314 327-222 141-142 151-170 597 601 602 502.23A vel. xbr. ... br. x 1310 vel br. x 988 yel 2319 vel. xbr 2109-2110 vel. xbr. . 2109 yel. xbr br. x 1601 yel br. x 580 yel br. x 881-883 yel yel. xbr yel. xbr br. x 7488 vel 2 1 3 3 1 13 5 11 4 6 6 1 1 7 2 4 3 4 5 9 4 3 6 YJ3r,DnP,R. YJ3roD2P2R. Y~Br2D2P~R. YJlr,D«P2R. YnBrJlP.R. YJJrI'J'Ji. YJ3rJDJ°tR. Y-,Br2D2P2R. Y2Br2D2PJi. Y2Br2D2P2R. YJir2D2P2R. YJJr-D2PJt. 56 48 80 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. It has been shown, then, that yellows of the four dark-eyed intense pigmented types exist. The pink-eyed yellows 1 1 ypes XXI-XXTV inclusive) have been crossed only inter se or with black pigmented forms, but it is certain that they also can occur in the four types com- parable to the dark-eyed intense series. The dark-eyed dilute yellows have been crossed with brown only in a few cases. Chiefly thej' have been bred inter se to determine whether the 2 : 1 ratio holds good in their case as in the intense forms. Of those tested, one, 9 7298, is of the zygotic formula YzBrJidiPpAzR and when crossed with a pink-eyed brown has given 1 yel, 1 pdyel, 1 BAg, 2 BrAg, 1 pBAg. This shows that types XXV and XXVII can exist. The other animal, also a female, gave by a pink-eyed brown male, 7 yel, 2 pyel, 2 Elk, 2 Br, 3 pB. This animal was of the formula Y*Br>Bd>PpR, and argues strongly in favor of the existence of types XXVI and XXVIII . ( )f t he pink-eyed dilute yellows few have been tested, but I have, at present, a race of animals which give only two sorts of young, viz, pink-eyed dilute yellows and pink-eyed dilute browns; such pink-eyed dilute yellows are the ultimate recessives of the yellow series belonging to type XXXII, formula YiBr^hp-iR. From the few matings given above, together with the larger number of yellow matings which follow, it is easy to sec that yellows may be obtained of the various zygotic compositions found in the non-yellow varieties, differing from them only by the addition of the restric- tion factor, R. We shall first consider the crosses between yellow animals of these four varieties, which form the intense dark-eyed series. Yellow x yellow, giving only dark-eyed intense young. Citnss 102. Giving Y and Br. Mating. Parents. 425 x 124 Y. Br. 127 38 39 2.-).') :;oi 297 :.7t 166 1 4 5 4 2 6 12 :; 3 3 l 2 1 1 7 502. 23A x 502.51*. . . Unmarked x 50."). 1 A. 1410 x 1667 1747x49-1746 1723 x 1827 7180x7181 893 x895 37 21 Cross 103. Giving Y, Br, and W (and in one case BrAg). Mating. 384 US 145 ITS is:, 183 326 352 Parents. I nmarked X unmarked 578x580 146x895 1 Hi 894 x895 894 x 895 I if. S93 04x895 1247x2311 726 I i!7 x2311 22 1 f> 3 1 3 8 3 46 BrAg. Br. 7 4 8 1 1 26 W 6 1 7 1 1 18 RESTRICTED SERIES. 81 Cross 104. Giving Y, BAg, B, and W. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. B. W. 3 3 2 1 3 1 8 9 10 15 248 570 502.1Ax502.5A.... 5()2.2Ax502.5A.... 502x511 3 1(i 7 2 5 2 2 ■2 1 509 x511 1217x1316 Unmarked x3297. . 29 4 1 13 Cross 105. Miscellaneous yellows giving Y, BAg, and B. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. B. BAg or B. 529 283 264 27 14 7 22 28 Unmarked xl938. 1723 x unmarked. . 1666 x 1667 509.1Ax511 509 x 510 38 i 3 3 — ' t— t j h- > 11 1 4 502 x 503 5 1 4 514.6Ax505.1A... 514.4Ax505.1A... 55 3 12 4 Sooty yellow x sooty yellow, giving only dark-eyed intense young. Cross 106. Giving Y, sY, B, and BAg. Mating. Parents. Y. sY. BAg. B. B or BAg. 440 471 502 3196x3777 Unmarked x 3957 . . . Unmarked X 3777 . . . 3 1 15 1 8 13 3 4 2 10 1 19 22 7 12 1 Cream x cream, giving nothing but dark-eyed intense young. Cross 107. Giving cream, or light yellow, B and Br. Mating. Parents. Cream Y. B. Br. 284 445 122 285 1248 x 1414 3907 x 875 648x647 1750x1745-46.. 4 2 2 1 2 2 2 8 3 4 82 THE [NHERITANCE OF Colon IN MICK. Cross 108. Giving cream, BAg, B, Br, ami 11'. Mating. Parents. Cream F. BAg. B. Br. W. 397 469 325 188 418 390SxS75 4 ■■> •) 4 1 2 4008x4796 1 2050x875 7 1 2 2 1248x580 Unmarked x875. . . 3 15 3 6 7 5 Yellow x cream, giving nothing but dark-eyed intense young. Cross 109. Giving F, I',. BrAg, and Br. Mating. Parents. Y. B. BrAg. Br. 450 233 Unmarked x3900. . . 882 x 601 36 1 10 3 5 1 37 10 6 Cross 110. Giving Y, B, BrAg, Br ?, and W. Mating. Parents. Y. B. BrAg. B or Br. IF. 273 272 2049x875... 2048x875... 5 4 1 1 1 4 9 1 1 1 4 Cross 111. Giving Y, cream, B, Br, and TF. Mating. Parents. F. Cream F. B. 2 1 1 Br. IF. 146 123 15! 284 x 875 . . 284 x647... 882 x 881 . . . 1 10 5 5 2 6 8 3 11 12 4 11 3 Yellow x yellow, airing intense and dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 112. Giving F, BAg, BrAg, Br, dY, dBAg. Mating. Parents. F. 9 10 dY. BAg. dBAg. BrAg. Br. 164 25: i 620x621 1658 1660.... 3 2 1 1 1 12 3 2 1 1 1 RESTRICTED SERIES. 88 Cross 113. Giving Y, BAg, dBAg, and II" .Mating. j Parents. 23 530 x 511... Y. BAg. dBAg. \Y . r, 3 I Yellow x yellow, giving intense dark-eyed and intrust pink-eyed young. Cross 114. Giving Y, pY, B, pB, Br, and pBr. Mating. Parents. Y. pY. B. Br. 2 pB. 2 2 pBr. 1 321 311 393 2198x2197 1947 x 1877 7 4 3 2 2 5 6 1 Unmarked x unmarked . . 14 4 12 2 4 1 Cross 114a. Giving Y, sY, pY, BAg, B, BrAg, Br, pBAg, pB, pBr, and pi. Mating. Parents. Y. sY. pY. BAg. B. ; BrAg. Br. 6 1 2 pBAg. pB. pBr. p? 477 459 256 244 287 Unmarked x 5228.. Unmarked x4631 . . 1722x1827 1724x1827 1722-24 x 1827 45 7 7 4 4 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 5 2 11 11 2 1 2 4 1 3 1 1 67 6 13 11 10 4 9 1 3 1 1 Cross 115. Giving Y, pY, BAg, BrAg. />. Br, pB, and W. Mating. Parents. y. 5 4 9 PY. BAg. BrAg. B. 4 Br. 1 PB. W. 430 159 3299 x 3297 .... 786 x 784 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 1 2 4 1 1 4 Sooty yelloiv x yellow, giving intense dark-eyed and int< nse pink-eyed young. Cross 116. Matins Parents. P. SY. pY. BAg. BrAg. ' B. Br. pBAg. 251 240 278 328 362 367 339 353 354 460 415 411 485 472 1826xlS29 j 2 1828x1829 j 5 1 1826-28x1829 ! 3 2666-67x1829 6 1 2666x1829 1 1 Unmarked x 1829 38 10 2668x1829 j 6 2667x1829 1 2665x1829 5 2 j Unmarked x unmarked. 4 ! Unmarked x 3460 10 3 Unmarked x 3640 ! 3 1 Unmarked x 3777 4 t Unmarked x 3957. 24 9 112 6 I 14 15 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 18 5 1 1 1 • • •> 34 17 pB. pBr. 2 1 1 6 Hi 84 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Yellow x yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 117. Mating. Parents. Y. pY. \BAg. dBAg. pBAg. pdBAg. pdB. pdBr. W. 446 Unmarked x 4054. . 6 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Yellow x yellow, miscellaneous. Cross 118. No color varieties recorded. Mating. Parents. Y. non Y. W. 556 555 579 544 568 543 565 572 Unmarked x 4334 Unmarked x 4523 Unmarked x 4631 Unmarked x4712 Unmarked x 4891 4 9 11 5 5 2 3 77 2 3 9 *2 4 38 2 Unmarked x 4149 Unmarked x unmarked . . 116 58 2 Yellow x dilute yellow, giving nothing but intense dark-eyed young. Cross 119. Giving Y, BAg ?, B, BrAg, and Br. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg or B. B. BrAg. Br. 546 i Unmarked x 5155 564 Unmarked x 4710 520 Unmarked x 4334 14 2 1 1 2 3 2 1 17 1 2 3 3 Yellow x dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 120. Giving Y, dY, dBAg, BrAg, and dBrAg. Mating. Parents. }'. dY. dBAg. BrAg. dBrAg. 567 566 553 Unmarked x 4146 Unmarked x 4712 Unmarked x 4905 2 6 2 6 1 1 1 1 1 10 6 1 1 3 Yellow x dilute yellow, giving only intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 121. Giving Y, pY, BAg, BrAg, B, and W. Mating. Parents. Y. pY. BAg. BrAg. B. W. 476 Unmarked x4710... 10 1 2 2 1 1 RESTRICTED SERIES. 85 Yellow x dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 122. Giving Y, pY, dY, pdY, BAg, dBrAg, dB, or dBAg. Mating. Parents. Y. dY. pY. pdY. BAg. dBrAg. dB or dBAg. 563 533 Unmarked x 4631... Unmarked x 5008 1 11 1 5 1 1 •• 1 1 2 12 6 1 1 1 1 2 Yellow x dilute sooty yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 123. Giving Y, sY, dY, dsY, BAg, BrAg, dBAg, and dBrAg. Mating. Parent*. Y. sY. dY. dsY. BAg. BrAg. BAg or BrAg. rfB^. dBrAg. 463 514 Unmarked x 4346. Unmarked x2348. 9 5 o 1 1 5 1 6 2 4 1 3 h-" 1—" 1 14 3 6 7 8 5 3 2 1 Yellow X pink-eyed yelloiv, giving only intense dark-eyed young. Cross 124. Giving Y and BAg. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. 554 99 Unmarked x 4149 227 x 413 3 4 1 7 1 Yellow X pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 125. Giving Y, B, and dB. Mating. ; Parents. Y. B. 125 326x563 4 1 dB. Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense pink-eyed and dark-eyed young. Cross 126. Giving Y, pY, B or BAg, B, Br, pBrAg, and pB. Mating, i Parents. Y. pY. BAg or B. B. Br. pBrAg. pB. P? 200 216 514 473 1282 x 1389 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 1283 x 1389 Unmarked x 4523 Unmarked X unmarked. 6 5 2 4 1 1 3 1 86 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Cross 127. Giving Y, pY, BAg, B, Br, pB, and W. Mating. Parent-. Y. pY. 1 2 BAg. B. Br. pB. 1 17. 2 2 501 532 (a) unmarked x 3297 . . . (b) unmarked x3297. . . 1 4 1 1 1 5 3 1 1 1 1 4 Yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense anil dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 128. Giving Y, pY, dBAg, and pdBAg. Mating. Parents. Y. PY. dBAg. pdBAg. 530 Unmarked x 4152. . 1 2 1 1 ('nam x pink-eyed yellow, giving nothing but dark-eyed intense young. Cross 129. Giving Y and BAg. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. 184 210 1223x1074.. 1223x1064.. 3 14 1 17 1 In the following crosses, between yellow and non-yellow animals, equality of yellow and non-yellow young is to be expected. These matings, like the yellow x yellow mating3 just cited are planned chiefly to test the relation of yellow to non-yellow forms, not with an eye to producing any certain color variety. Yellow x black agouti, giving only dark-eyed intense young. Cross 130. Giving Y and BAg. Mm ting. Parent s. r. BAg. 4 i 12 24 506x530. 5 A 530.1Ax630 3 1 4 11 Cross 131. Giving Y, BAg, and 11' .Mating. Parents. r. BAg. W. 16 608x570.... 2 1 1 RESTRICTED SERIES. 87 Cross 132. Giving Y, BAg, BrAg, and W. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. BrAg. W. 1 95 622 x 624 . . . 2 1 1 Yellow x black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 133. Giving Y, BAg, and dBAg. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. dBAg. 26 i 530.1 A x 530.5A 1 5 1 Yellow x black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 134. Giving Y, dY, pY, BAg, dBAg, BrAg, dBrAg, B, pB, and Br. Mating. Parents. Y. dY. pY. pdY. BAg. dBAg. BrAg. dBrAg. B. PB. Br. 489 375 Unmarked x 3114 Unmarked x 3114-15. 11 24 1 8 2 4 10 3 5 2 8 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 35 9 2 14 8 10 2 3 1 3 Cream x black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed young only. Cross 135. Giving cream and BAg* Mating. Parents. Cream Y. BAg. 443 434 Unmarked x unmarked .... 2108-09x3947 1 2 1 1 3 2 *The black agoutis used in this cross were wild. Cross 136. Giving Y, BAg, and B. Mating. Parent. Y. BAg. B. 265 917 X 1550 3 2 i Cross 137. Giving Y, BAg, and BrAg. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. BrAg. 534 4798 x 4790. . . 2 1 1 88 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Yellow x (liluli black agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young. Cross 138. Giving )'. BAg, and BrAg. Mating. 322 412 Parents. Y. 4 2 BAg. BrAg. 2154x1871 Unmarked x unmarked. . . 2 o G 2 2 Yellow x diluU black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 139. Giving Y, dY, BAg, dBAg, B, dB, BrAg, and Br. Mating. Parents. 438 432 409 421 4435 x 2829 4434-35 x 2829 Unmarked x 2829 . . 2352x2859 Y. dY. BAg. dBAg. B. 4 1 4 1 . . 10 8 3 1 2 1 dB. BrAg. Br. 3 1 20 10 1 Cream x dilute black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 140. Giving Y, dY, dsY, and Br. Mating. Parents. Y. dY. dsY. Br. 373 2348 x 2829. . 4 2 1 1 Cross 141. Giving Y, BAg, dBrAg, and W. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. dBrAg. It'. 402 2255xl93S. 1 Sooty yellow x dilute black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 142. Giving Y, sY, pY, BAg, and pBAg. Mating. 346 Parents. Y. sY. pY. BAg. Box BAg. pBAg. 2411 X2609 11 7 3 17 6 2 Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving only intense dark-eyed young. Cross 143. Giving Y, BAg, and />'. Mating. 76 78 Parents. Y. BAg. B. 509.2B x409. . . 227x412 9 9 8 6 5 9 17 11 RESTRICTED SERIES. 89 Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving ink use ami dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 144. Giving Y, BAg, dBAg, and BrAg. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. dBAg. lirAi 330 1667x1870... 9 Yellow x pink-eyed black agouti, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 145. Giving Y, BAg. dBAg. pBAg, B, and pB. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. pBAg. dBAg. B. pB. 371 1806 x 2339 8 1 1 1 2 1 Cross 146. Giving Y, pY, dY, pdY, B, dB, and W. Mating. Parents. Y. pY. dY. pdY. B. dB. W. 433 4051 X unmarked . . . 5 4 1 1 2 2 4 Yellow x black, giving only dark-eyed intense young. Cross 147. Giving Y and BAg. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. 54 49 90 61 502x177 5 2 4 3 2 5 3 2 185x315... Unmarked x502.5B.. 502. 3B x unmarked . . 14 12 Cross 148. Giving only Y and B. Mating. Parents. Y. B. 370 52 53 88 137 40 1977x2046 502.22B x 182 3 2 2 4 2 3 4 2 1 2 509 x 182 Unmarked x 321 224x347 Unmarked X505.1A.. 11 14 90 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Cross 149. Giving F, BAg, and B. Mating. Parents. Y. \BAg. B. 35 103 207x502.6B 225x347 3 2 2 1 2 5 5 3 7 Cross 150. Giving F, B, and Br. Mating. Parents. F. 2 7 7 B. Br. 117 328x323 292 1662x1660 238 1662-63 x 1660 5 3 3 1 1 1 16 11 3 Cross 151. Giving F, BAg, and IF Mating. Parents. F. BAg. W. 46 47 17 42 43 178 x 530.01B 509.3Bxl77 206x510 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 3 2 3 3 201.1Ax511 201.2Ax511 11 7 12 Cross 152. Giving F, B, and IF. Mating. 59 21 72 58 51 Parents. Unmarked X 141. 206x514 178x320 168-170-171 x 185 206x172 B. 4 3 6 3 1 1 2 s 1 2 17 14 Cross 153. Giving F, cream, BAg, BrAg, B, and Br. W 1 3 3 2 2 11 Mating. Parents. F. Cream F. BAg. />'/•. 1;/. B. Br. 73 71 108 357 91 -67 x unmarked. . . 284 x 182 5 15 7 3 5 1 5 1 1 1 2 i 1 " 4 3 Unmarked x 323. . 1978x2406 328x502.5B 1 3 35 1 9 5 5 7 RESTRICTED SERIES. 91 Cross 154. Giving V. cream, BAgf, B, Br, and 11'. Mating. Parents. )'. Cream Y. BAg or B. B. Br. W. 57 SO 94 152xl.lA.... 4 :; 1S5x319 4 5 1S5X34S 9 3 l 9 , i 1 1 2 10 17 3 1 17 4 12 Cross 155. Giving Y. BAg. BrAg, /-'. and IT. Yellow x black, ginng inU nsi and diluh dark-eyed young. Cross 150. Giving Y, B. Br. ami dB. Mating. Parents. Y. B. Br. dB. 276 1663x1660 2 5 2 1 Yellow x black, giving intense dark-i pink-eyea toung. Cross 157. Giving Y. pY, B. and pB. Mating. Parents. Y. pY. B. pB. 341 491 456 2195 X2197 Unmarked ■ 2948 . 2803x2948 9 5 3 1 1 3 6 2 1 1 1 10 2 11 3 Cross 15S. Giving Y. cream, j>Y. B. Br. pB, ami pBr. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. BAg or B. B. BrAg. W. 41 55 70 133 66 206x510.2A 184xl4Sa 325 x unmarked 502.2B x unmarked 6 6 2 6 5 1 2 5 5 1 4 1 2 1 2 3 2 2 5 5 2 20 S 1 1 5 S 16 Mating. Parents. V. Cream Y. pY. B. Br. PB. pBr. V' 424 2803 x unmarked 3 . . 9 1 1 319 1941 x 1942 6 3 9 5 2 1 290 1882x1877 2 1 4 1 2 121 549x540-41-42-44. . . 14 6 5 ;; 3 2 214 549x541 14 1 6 13 2 6 1 39 1 7 41 14 14 5 2 92 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Cream x black, giving only intense dark-eyed young. Cross 159. Giving Y, B, and Br. Mating. 217 288 Parents. r. B. Br. 1 2 Unmarked x OSS 2092 < 989 3 ■ > ■> 1 2 6 3 3 Cross 160. Giving )'. B, Br, and W. Mating. Parents. Y. B. Br. W. 156 328 ■ 988. .11 3 10 7 Cream x dilute Unci:, giving only intense dark-eyed young. ( Iross 161. Giving Y and ' Mating. Parents. 312 1751 x 1 135 Y. Yellow x dtforfc black, giving inU nse and dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 162. Giving Y, dY, 'IB. and dBr. Mating. Parents. 1 dY. 2 dB. 3 1 448 1499 x 1496. . . FeMo*'- x pink-eyed Hark, giving only dark-eyed intense young. Cross 163. Giving Y and B. Mating. Parents. Y. 2 5 1 ■■ B. 1 7 5 271 289 307 11139 x 1587... 1606 x 1610 2049x1610... s 13 Yellow x pink-eyed black, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 164. Giving Y, Br, and pB. Mating. Parents. )'. Br. pB. 1 309 2050x2062 4 1 RESTRICT! ED SERIES. 93 uu x pink- . giving only dark-eyed ii • i ■ • Cross 165. Giving >', cream, and B. Mating. Parents. Y. _> 10 1 7 8 am Y. 3 ■> 3 15 •"> 4 10 299 180 204 225 1105 > 1 111 1256 x 1192 1195 / 989 Unmarked < unmarked . . 28 5 37 Cross 166. Giving }'. sY, B. and fir. Ma Pa rents. Y. .-}•. fi. Br. 20s 1111 x 1394 4 1 \ •_) ' toss 166a. Giving Y, cream, Br, and U'. Mating. Parents. 1 105 x580. . . . 1 2 f '"arn }'. 1 fir. U'. 226 2 _> YeUou) / brown agouti, giving onhj lark-eyed young Cross 107. Giving Y and BAg. Mating. Pan nts. BAg. 30 511.2B x 502.4A i Cross 168. Giving Y and BrAg. .Mating, i Parenl - Y. BrAg. 32 110 401 575 / 502.5A 427 x 424 1340 / unmarked.. 1 3 5 2 4 5 10 Cross 169. Giving Y. BAg. and fi. Mating. Parents. Y. 5 fiA?. fi. 50 51 1.1 A xl40. . 1 2 94 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Cross 170. Giving Y, BrAg, and Br. Mating. Parents. Y. BrAg. Br. 191 892x895 2 3 1 Cross 171. Giving Y, BrAg, and W -Mating. Parents. Y. 1 BrAg. W. 75 170x410 5 2 Cross 172. Giving Y, BrAg, Br, and W Mating. Parents. Y. BrAg. Br. W. 170 891 x 895 9 2 5 6 Yellow x brown agouti, giving ink nst and dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 173. Giving Y, BAg, BrAg, and dBrAg. Mating. Parents. Y. 7 BAg. BrAg. dBrAg. 1 09 171 X 111 5 5 Cross 174. Giving Y, dY, and dBrAg. Mating. Parents. Y. dY. dBrAg. 423 3414x3413.... 1 2 ' 4 In the following matings the yellow parents were dilute, and of four different sorts, viz: Dilute black-eyed yellow, YzBriB^PiAzR; Dilute black-eyed yellow, Y2BriB>d>P2R; Dilute brown-eved yellow, YzBrjlzPiAiR; Dilute brown-eyed yellow, YiBr^iJPJt. These four varieties are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to tell from one another by superficial examination. The two brown-ej^cd types may, however, be distinguished at times by their eye-color, wliich is, as in the corresponding intense types, always brown. The following description will apply then to these four varieties: Eyes black or brown, ears pink. Ventral hairs much the same as in the intense yellow type. Tail unpigmented. Dorsal hairs a dull heavy j'ellow with the characteristic washed-out appearance of all dilute forms. Hairs at the base of the ears and around the anus are indistinguishable from the rest of the coat. RESTRICTED SERIES. 95 Dilute yellow x dilute yellow, giving only dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 17.5. Giving dY and dBAg. Mating. Parents. dY. \dBAg. 499 Unmarked x 3875.... 9 Cross 176. Giving dY and dB. Mating. Parents. dY. dB. 2 547 Unmarked X 5155 (3 Cross 177. Giving dY, dBAg, and dBrAg. Mating. Parents. dY. dBAg. dBrAg. 382 181 482 Unmarked x 4456.. Unmarked x 4712.. 9 15 2.3 2 8 2 3 4 9 49 12 16 Cross 178. Giving dY, dBAg, dBrAg, and dBr. Mating. Parents. dY. dBAg. dBrAg. dBr. 3 484 Unmarked x 4334 .... 8 1 3 Cross 179. Giving dY, dBrAg, and W. Mating. Parents. dY. dBrAg. W. 483 4147x4146... 4 2 3 Cross 180. Giving dY, dBAg, dBrAg, and W. Mating. Parents. dY. dBAg. dBrAg. W. 531 Unmarked x4146 j 9 1 Dilute yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 181. Giving dY, BAg, B, dBAg, and dBrAg. Mating. Parents. dY. BAg. B. dBAg. dBrAg. 500 Unmarked x 4152. 2 1 1 1 1 96 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Dilute yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 182. Giving Y, pY, dY, pdY, BAg, dBAg, B, and pB. Mating. Parents. Y. pY. dY. pdY. BAg. dBAg. B. pB. BAg or B. 545 480 167 539 Unmarked x4152. Unmarked x 3875. 4524x4523 Unmarked x 4523. 2 1 2 2 3 3 1 3 1 o tit 1 o 1 •• 1 2 i 2 5 i 8 5 3 2 1,3 1 2 Dilute yellow X pink-eyed dilute yellow, giving only dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 183. Giving dY, dBAg, and dB. Mating. Parents. dY. dBAg. dB. 512 Unmarked x 3875. . . . 15 8 2 Dilute yellow X wild black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed young. Cross 184. Giving Y and ? Mating. Parents. Y. 523 : 4345x5160-5101... 1 Dilute yellow x dilute black, agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 185. Giving dY, dsY, and dBAg. Mating. Parents. dY. 7 5 dsY. dBAg. 439 417 3553x3876 3554x3875 1 5 3 12 1 8 Dilute yellow x dilute brown agouti, giving only dilute dark-eyed young. Cross 186. Giving dY, dBAg, and dBrAg. Mating. Parents. dY. dBAg. dBrAg. 450 127 431 343 4023-24x4021-22.... 4024x4021-22 4023x4021-22 2259x2233 1 8 6 6 5 4 4 5 5 1 3 21 13 14 RESTRICTED SERIES. 97 Dilute sooty yellow x dilute brown agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 1S7. Giving dsY, pdY, dBAg, and dBrAg. Mating. Parents. dsY. pdY. dBAg. dBrAg. 490 465 4803 x 4573 Unmarked x 4753 . . . o O 2 1 1 1 1 5 2 1 1 In the following crosses, the yellow parents were pink-eyed, and of four different types, viz.: Pink-eyed yellow, Y2Br2B,D1p>A2R; Pink-eyed yellow, YiBi'BoD^R; Pink-eyed yellow, Y^rtDtfpzAiR; Pink-eyed yellow, YJlrzDzpzR. The eyes of the two varieties last named contain only a small number of granules, all of which are brown. They are indistinguishable from the eyes of the first two varieties, which, however, contain black granules. The following description will serve for all four varieties: Eyes clear deep pink. Ears pink and unpigmented. In every other way these pink-eyed types resemble closely the dark-eyed yellow types. They occur in all grades from a deep orange to light cream, as do the dark-eyed forms. Because of the reduction of black and brown granules sooty pink-eyed yellows are seldom if ever obtained. Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving only intense pink-eyed young. Cross 188. Giving pY, pBAg, and pB. Mating. Parents. pY. pBAg. pB. p? 155 195 160 173 113 1066 x 1064 . . 801 x 1064 . . 1067 x 1064 . . 1074 x 563 . . . 562 x 563 . . . 3 2 2 2 6 5 1 3 2 2 1 i l 15 9 4 4 Pink-eijed yellow x pink-eyed yellow, giving intense and dilute pink-eyed young. Cross 189. Giving pY, pdY, and pdB. Mating. Parents. pY. pdY. pdB. 468 Unmarked x 4523 1 1 1 Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed dilute yellow, giving intense and dilute pink-eyed young. Cross 190. Giving pY, pdY, pB, and pdB. Mating. Parents. pY. pdY. pB. pdB. pB or pdB. p? 2 351 2342x2343... 13 1 4 2 3 98 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Pink-eyed yellow x black agouti, giving intense dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 191. Giving Y, pY, BAg, and B. .Mating. Parents. Y. pY. BAg. B. Dark-eyed. 126 414x563.. 8 1 5 5 2 Pink-eyed yellow x dilute black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 191a. (living Y, /;)*, B, dB or dBAg, pdBAg. Mating. Parents. Y. pY. B. dB or dBAg. pdBAg. pi 254 685 x 1435 1 2 3 1 3 1 Pink-eyed yellow x brown, giving intense dark-eyed young. Cross 192. Giving i' and BAg. Mating. Parents. Y. BAg. 201 1489x1437... 1 5 3 Pink-eyed yellow X pink-eyed black agouti, giving only pink-eyed intense young. Cross 193. Giving pY and pBAg. Mating. Parents. pY. pBAg. p? 79 167 157 413x412 1062 x 1065 1060x1065 10 3 14 4 4 *3 19 22 3 Cross 194. Giving pY, pBAg, and pB. Mating. Parents. pY. pBAg. pB. 102 557x563 23 8 2 Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed brown agouti, giving only pink-eyed intense young. Cross 195. Giving pY and pBAg. Mating. 194 Parents. p Y. pBAg. 1395x1441... 3 2 RESTRICTED SERIES. Pink-eyed yellow x pink-eyed black, giving only inU nse pink-eyed young. Cross 196. Giving pBAg and pY ' 99 Mating. Parents. pBAg. 237 GS4 x 763 . In the following crosses the yellow parents would fall into one of the four following classes: Pink-eyed dilute yellow, Y>Bi\B:d:p2A2R; Pink-eyed dilute yellow, Y :Br.B,d1p1R; Pink-eyed dilute yellow, }'./>;_i/J//...l>7?; Pink-eyed dilute yellow, Y^Br.djiJ!. These four types, as in the intense pink-eyed forms, are indistinguishable from one another by superficial examination. Eyes pink, otherwise indistinguishable from the dark-eyed dilute yellows already described. No case of a pink-eyed dilute sooty yellow has been recorded in these experiments. Pink-eyed dilute yellow x dilute black agouti, giving dilute dark-eyed and dilute pink-eyed young. Cross 197. Giving dY, pdY, dBAg, pdBAg, dB, pdB, dBrAg, and dBr. Mating. Parents. dY. pdY. dBAg. pdBAg. dB. pdB. dBrAg. dBr. pdf 435 425 436 Unmarked x 2488. 3493x2488 3490x2488 3 1 4 5 3 4 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 3 1 1 1 8 12 4 5 1 7 1 1 1 Pink-eyed dilute yellow x black, giving intense and dilute dark-eyed and pink-eyed young. Cross 198. Giving Y, pY, pdY, B, pB, and dB. Mating. Parents. Y. pY. pdY. B. pB. dB. p? 389 2345 x 2343 4 5 1 4 3 o *•> 1 We may now consider a few tests of albinos which have been made. All of these seem to show that albinos may be potentially any of the 32 color varieties already mentioned or any of their heterozygous combinations. None of the following albinos were tested for dilution and therefore they are treated as intense in their formula-, though if the proper test was made they might not turn out so. 100 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Cross 199. Albino x pink-eyed brovm. Mating. 517 536 458 540 466 518 498 470 516 497 t7s 51 18 505 429 578 Parents. Unmarked x unmarked. 4871 x-07 Unmarked x 440 4873 x-07 4870-73 x -07 4870 x unmarked 1^70 x-07 4272x5162 1285 72x5162 4872 x-07 4273x5163 1285x5162 4271 X5163 1108x3746 Unmarked x unmarked 2 2 B. 1 3 4 3 BrAg. 1 Br. 8 7 6 1 9 3 1 6 5 1 2 2 PB. pBrAg. 8 3 5 pBr. Formula of albino parent. 3 6 2 7 3 BrtDtPi. BriDzPi. Br2D-2P2. BroBDiPt. Br2BDtP,. BrtBD,Pt. BrtBDiPt. Br2D2Pp. BrtDzPpA. Br,BD2Pp. Br2D2p2A. BnDtpzA. Br2D2p2A2. Br2D2P2R. BriBDiPsAR. A small number of more accurate tests of albinos follow: Albinos x pink-eyed dilute brown. Cross 200. Mating. Parents. dBr. 4 18 614 626 Unmarked x 7551 albino Unmarked x 7868 albino 22 Both 7551 and 7868 albinos turned out potentially homozygous dilute brown animals. Two crosses between homozygous dilute brown animals carrying albinism, and 7868 albino, together with another albino (7748) of similar constitution, follow: Cross 201. Mating. Parents. dBr. W. 628 637 7749 dil. br. x 7748 albino. .. . 7677 dil. br. x 7868 albino. .. . 6 2 4 7 8 11 The expectation is equality of white and dilute brown young. The following case may in one sense be considered as unconformable. It seems probable, however, that the animal recorded as yellow was a dilute form, for the experiment occurred early in the series (1907) before I had learned to recognize dilute animals by night when young. This animal did not live more than two weeks and could not there- fore be tested by breeding. Pink-* i/i'l black agouti x brown. Cross 202. Mating. Parents. Y? BAg. B. 77 415x409.... *1 3 1 *Probable incorrect classification. BIBLIOGRAPHY. 101 BIBLIOGRAPHY. Allen, G. M., 1904. The heredity of coat color in mice. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts and Sci., vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 61-163. Bateson, W., 1903. The present state of knowledge of colour-heredity in mice and rats. Proc. Zool. Soc, vol. 2, pp. 71-78. 1909. Mendel's principles of heredity. Cambridge (Eng.) University Press, 396 pp. Castle, W. E., 1905. Heredity of coat characters in guinea-pigs and rabbits. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication No. 23, 78 pp., 6 plates. 1906. Yellow mice and gametic purity. Science, N. S., vol. 24, pp. 275-280. 1907a. On a case of reversion induced by cross-breeding and its fixation. Science, N. S., vol. 25, pp. 151-153. 19076. Color varieties of rabbits and other rodents, their origin and inheritance. Science, N. S., vol. 26, pp. 287-291. 1909. Studies of inheritance in rabbits. Carnegie Institution of Washington Pub- lication No. 114, 68 pp., 4 plates. 1912a. On the origin of a pink-eyed guinea-pig with colored coat. Science, N. >S.. vol. 35, pp. 508-510. 19126. On the origin of an albino race of deer-mouse. Science, N. S., vol. 35, pp. 346-348. 1912c. The inconstancy of unit characters. Am. Nat., vol. 46, pp. 351-362. 1912d. On the inheritance of the tri-color coat in guinea-pigs and its relation to Gabon's Law of Ancestral Heredity. Am. Nat., vol. 46, pp. 437-440. Castle, W. E., and Little, C. C, 1909. The peculiar inheritance of pink eyes among colored mice. Science, N. S., vol. 30, pp. 313-314. 1910. On a modified mendelian ratio among yellow mice. Science, N. S., vol. 32, pp. 868-870. Castle, W. E. and MacCurdy, H. (See MacCurdy, H.) Crampe, 1883. Zuchtsversuche mit zahmen Wanderratten, Landwirths. Jahrb., xii, p. 389. 1884. Second paper, Landwirths. Jahrb., xin, p. 699. Cuenot, L., 1902. La loi de Mendel et 1'heredite de la pigmentation chez les souris. Arch. Zool. Exp. et Gen. [3], vol. 10, Notes et revue, p. xxvn. Arch. Zool. Exp. et Gen. [4], vol. 1, Notes et revue, p. xxxm. Ibid., Notes et revue [4], vol. 2, pp. xlv-lvi. Ibid., Notes et revue [4], vol. 3, pp. cxxiii-cxxxii. Ibid., Notes et revue [4], vol. 5, p. 1. Sur quelque anomalies apparentes de proportions mendeliennes. Ibid. [4], vol. 6, Notes et revue, pp. vn-xv. 1911. 7me note, Les determinants de la couleur chez les souris, etude comparative. Ibid., Notes et revue [4], vol. 8, pp. xl-lvi. Darbishire, A. D., 1902, 1903. Notes on the results of crossing Japanese waltzing mice with European races, Biometrika, n, pp. 101-104. Ibid., pp. 165-173, pp. 282-285. 1904. [Second paper], Biometrika, in, pp. 1-51. Davenport, C. B., 1904. Color inheritance in mice. Science, N. S., vol. 19, pp. 110-114. Doncaster, L., 1906. On the inheritance of coat colour in rats. Proc. Camb. Phil. .Soc, vol. 13, pp. 215-227. Durham, F. M., 1908. A preliminary account of the inheritance of coat colour in mice. Rep. Evol. Comm., 4, p. 41. 1911. Further experiments on the inheritance of coat colour in mice. Journ. Genet., vol. 1, pp. 159-178. East, E. M., and Hayes, H. K., 1911. Inheritance in maize. Conn. Agri. Exp. Station, Bull. No. 167. 1903. 2me note. 1904. 3me note. 1905. 4me note. 1907. 5me note. 1908. 6me note. 102 THE INHERITANCE OF COLOR IN MICE. Gortner, R. A., 1911a. Studies on Melanin IV. Am. Nat., vol. 45, pp. 743-753. 19116. On Melanin. Biochem. Bull., vol. 1, pp. 207-215. Guaita, G. von, 1898. Versuche mit Kreuzungen von vcrschiedenen Rassen des Hausmaus. Ber. Xaturf. Ges. Freiburg, Bd. 10, p. 317. 1900. Zweite Mittheilung fiber Versuche mit Kreuzungen von verschiedenen Rassen des Hausmaus. Ibid., Bd. 11, p. 131. Hvrst, C. C., 1905. Experimental studies on heredity in rabbits. Linn. Soc. Journ. Zool., vol. 29, p. 283. Keeble, F., and Armstrong, E. F., 1912. The role of oxydases in the formation of the anthocyan pigments of plants. Journ. Genetics, vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 277-306. Little, C. C., 1911a. The "dilute" forms of yellow mice. Science, N. S., vol. 33, pp. 896-897. 19116. The influence of heredity and of environment in determining the coat colors in mice. Science, N. S., vol. 34, p. 563. 1912. Yellow and agouti factors in mice not associated. Am. Nat., vol. 46, pp. 491-493. MacCurdy, II., and Castle. W. E., 1907. Selection and cross-breeding in relation to the inheritance of coat-pigment and coat-patterns in rats and guinea-pigs. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication No. 70, 50 pp., 2 plates. Morgan, T. H., 1911a. The influence of heredity and of environment in determining the coat color in mice. Annals N. Y. Acad, of Sci., vol. 21, pp. 87-117, 3 plates. 19116. An attempt to analyze the constitution of the chromosomes on the basis of sex-limited inheritance in Drosophila. Journ. Exp. Zool., vol. 11, pp. 365-412, 1 plate. 1911c. Moulting and change of color of coat in mice. Science, N. S., vol. 34, p. 918. Midge, G. P., 1908a. On the hereditary transmission of certain coat characters in rats. Proc. Roy. Soc, Series B, vol. 80, pp. 97-121. 19086. [Second paper, same title.] Proc. Roy. Soc, Series B, vol. 80, pp. 388-393. 1909a. Note on the chemical nature of albinism. Proc. Physiol. Soc, March 27, p. LXVII. 19096. Further note on the chemical nature of albinism. Proc Physiol. Soc, October 23, p. xvn. Plate, L., 1910. Die Erbformeln der P'arbenrassen von Mus musculus. Zool. Anz., vol. 35, No. 20, pp. 634-640. Riddle, O., 1909. Our knowledge of melanin color formation and its bearing on the Mcndclian description. Biol. Bull., vol. 16, pp. 316-351. Sturteva.xt, A. H., 1912. Is there association between the yellow and agouti factors in mice? Am. Nat., vol. 46, pp. 368-371. PLATE 1. r 3 * M Wild type Black Agouti (Mus musculus), YBrBDPA Dilute Black Agouti, YBrBdPA. Pink-eyed Black Agouti, YBrBDpA. Pink-eyed dilute Black Agouti, YBrBdpA. A HOfNaCC BALTIMORE LITTLE PLATE 2. * 6 ** *) t I 5. Brown Agouti, YBrDPA. 6. Dilute Brown Agouti, YBrdPA. 7- Pink-eyed Brown Agouti, YBrDpA. 8. Pink- eyed dilute Brown Agouti, YBrdpA. LITTLE PLATE 3. J «j 11 G 9. Black, YBrBDP. 10. Dilute Black, YBrBdP. 1 1. Pink-eyed Black, YBrBDp. 12. Pink-eyed dilute Black, YBrBdp. 12 AHOEN&CO BALTIMORE LITTLE PLATE 4. 13 0 .■*» k # 14 vJ 15 > V » 13. Brown, YBrDPr. 14. Dilute Brown, YBrdP. 15. Pink-eyed Brown, YBrDp. 16. Pink-eyed dilute Brown, YBrdp. 16 LITTLE PLATE 5. i }m 17 e> d d £j 18 17. Black-eyed Cream (Yellow), YBrBDPR. 18. Brown-eyed Yellow, YBrDPR. 19. Dilute Brown-eyed Yellow, YBrdPR. 20. Sooty Yellow, YBrDPR. Castle, William Ernest 4-31 version C38S5 BioMed. PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY