RUSSIA' WILD YEGRASS for Western Canada .-■' e »J> CANADA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PUBLICATION 991 1966 A PASTURE GRASS FOR DRY AREAS Russian wild ryegrass is especially useful for pasture in the dry prairies and the semiarid interior of British Columbia. This grass is a long-lived perennial bunchgrass with extensive fibrous roots. It is exceptionally resistant to cold and drought. Russian wild ryegrass is the only cultivated grass that cures well on the stem and retains its nutritive value in the summer and late fall. Livestock pastured on this grass make good gains even in the fall when they tend to lose weight on most other grasses. Russian wild ryegrass is one of the best for farmyards and lawns that cannot be watered. If you are going to use Russian wild ryegrass, remember: • Sawki is the recommended variety. • For pasture, seed in the spring in a well-prepared seedbed, or in the late fall into clean stubble, at 5 to 6 pounds per acre and A to 1 inch deep. In dry areas, space the rows 12 to 18 inches apart; in more moist areas, 6 to 12 inches apart. For a seed crop, drill in rows 36 inches apart at 2 to 3 pounds per acre. • Seed a legume with Russian wild ryegrass wherever pos- sible. Rambler alfalfa is recommended. • For farmyards and lawns, broadcast or drill the seed at a heavy rate on a well-prepared seedbed. • When grown for seed, Russian wild ryegrass makes an ideal dual-purpose crop as the aftermath provides a nutritious, pala- table pasture for late summer and fall. • Seed yields may be maintained at a high level for several years by fertilizing, removing the aftermath, and irrigating in in dry years. • Harvest for seed when the straw is golden yellow and the seed is in the late milk to firm dough stage. Swathing and threshing the seed later with a combined is recommended. CONTENTS Adaptation 5 Varieties 5 Seeding and Land Preparation 5 U ses and Management 6 P aslure 6 Hay 9 Farmyards and Lawns ] ] Seed Production ] "| Seeding 11 Fertilizing 12 Irrigating 13 Aftermath 14 Harvesting 15 Cleaning 16 Marketing. u Other Helpful Information 17 RUSSIAN WILD RYEGRASS for Western Canada T. Lawrence and D.H. Heinrichs Experimental Farm, Swift Current, Sask. Russian wild ryegrass (Elymus junceus Fisch.) was introduced from Siberia by the University of Saskatchewan in 1926. It was first grown at the Experimental Farm, Swift Current, in 1936, and was distributed from there to seed growers in Western Canada in 1949. It is an excellent pasture grass for the southern areas of the Canadian prairies. Its good curing qualities make it especially useful for late summer and fall grazing. The aftermath from seed production fields is nutritious and can be used for late summer and fall pasture. Russian wild ryegrass is a long-lived perennial bunchgrass with ex- tensive fibrous roots. It is very resistant to cold and drought. Seedlings grow slower than those of crested wheatgrass and consequently it is more difficult to establish. Once established, however, it is more persistent than crested wheatgrass (Figure 1). The leaves of Russian wild ryegrass are mostly basal; a few grow on the seedstalks. Seedstalks seldom form when the grass is grown in solid seedings, but when it is grown in spaced rows they are from 2 to 4 feet tall. Figure 1 - Russian wild ryegrass plants (left) in a nursey were still intact 14 years after planting. Crested wheatgrass plants (right) were dying from the centers of the clumps (arrows). The head is a dense spike with seeds that shatter readily at maturity. The seed is similar in size and shape to that of Summit or Nordan crested wheatgrass but is slightly pubescent, and its tip is blunter. ADAPTATION Russian wild ryegrass grows wild in southeastern Siberia, Russia and central Asia. Russian authorities describe its habitat as steppes and steppe slopes. In Canada, Russian wild ryegrass is well adapted to the loam and clay soils of the prairies of Saskatchewan, Alberta, and Manitoba and the semi- arid interior of British Columbia. It is difficult to establish on sandy soils in dry areas because the seedlings grow slowly and do not get rooted deep enough before the surface soil dries out. Once established, however,it does well on sandy soils. Also, this grass tolerates saline soil rather well. VARIETIES Sawki, is the only variety licensed for sale in Canada. It produces more seed and slightly more forage than commercial strains. It was developed at the Experimental Farm, Swift Current and released in January 1963. Vinall, developed at Mandan, North Dakota, by the United States De- partment of Agriculture, is recommended in the United States. In Canada it is not superior to Sawki. SEEDING AND LAND PREPARATION Spring seeding is preferable to fall seeding. Firm the seedbed to ensure shallow seeding. Depth controls attached to the drill discs help to seed at Figure 2 - Attachments for drill discs to control depth of seeding. Left to right: a plywood type to be clamped on the disc, a commercial pie plate clamp-on type, and a flange ring spot welded to the disc. a uniformly shallow depth of less than one inch (Figure 2). Because Rus- sian wild ryegrass seedlings develop slowly, destroy weeds before seeding cither by cultivation or with herbicides. You may use additional chemical weed control after the grass has developed beyond the three-leaf stage. When fall seeding is necessary wait until after mid-October and sow into clean stubble without cultivation. The stubble will trap snow and en- sure a moisture supply for germination early in the spring. For pasture in the semiarid regions, seed Russian wild ryegrass in rows 12 or 18 inches apart at 5 to 6 pounds per acre, together with 1 pound of Rambler alfalfa. In more moist areas, you may increase the rate to 8 pounds per acre and seed in rows 6 or 7 inches apart. For seed production seed Russian wild ryegrass in rows 3 feet apart at 2 to 2/4 pounds per acre. USES AND MANAGEMENT Pasture Russian wild ryegrass is valuable for pasture when grown alone or in a mixture with alfalfa. In tests on five experimental farms in the Prairie Provinces the average yield of Russian wild ryegrass was about the same as that of crested wheatgrass, but it contained more protein. The compara- tive yields in pounds per acre were: Dry matter Protein Russian wild ryegrass 2,516 374 Crested wheatgrass 2,449 342 Cattle and sheep prefer Russian wild ryegrass to bromegrass or crested wheatgrass, and therefore it is best not to grow them together in mixture or in one enclosure. In an experiment with 2-acre plots at Tugaske, Saskatchewan, cattle ate Russian wild ryegrass in preference to crested wheatgrass and brome grass. The percentages of various grasses eaten were: Russian wild ryegrass 90, bromegrass 70, and crested wheatgrass 55. This preference held throughout the season during different years, and at a heavy stocking rate. On three Saskatchewan farms at Swift Current, Maple Creek, and Radisson, where pure stands of bromegrass, crested wheatgrass, and Russian wild ryegrass were grown in the same enclosures, the animals grazed the Russian wild ryegrass to the ground but grazed the other grasses sparingly. Russian wild ryegrass recovers rapidly after grazing when moisture is adequate (Figure 3). At Outlook, Saskatchewan, the second cutting of Rus- sian wild ryegrass yielded considerably more than the second cuttings of either crested wheatgrass or bromegrass. The dry matter yields in tons per acre from the three grasses grown along and in mixture with alfalfa were: Alone With alfalfa Grass Cut 1 Cut 2 Total Cut 1 Cut 2 Total Russian wild ryegrass 1.27 0.76 2.03 1.28 1.73 3.00 Fairway crested wheat- grass 1.35 0.44 1.79 1.40 1.59 2.99 Bromegrass 1.37 0.34 1.71 1.92 1.26 3.18 ■**»»*«! igure 3 - Russian wild ryegrass (foreground) resumes growth much better after cutting than crested wheatgrass (background). The photo was taken one week after cutting in June. In a grazing trial at Swift Current sheep were used to graze Russian wild rye grass- alfalfa and crested wheatgrass-alfalfa pastures continuously throughout the season. Pasture production, consumption, and carrying capa- city were similar for the two mixtures, but liveweight gains per ewe and per acre were about 50 percent greater for the Russian wild ryegrass pasture whereas consumption per pound of gain was considerably less. Hi e 4-year average gains and yields from the Russian wild ryegrass- alfalfa and crested wheatgrass-alfalfa pastures, on dryland, grazed at the rate of two yearling ewes per acre for 5% months, were: Pounds lb. eaten per pound gained Mixture Russian wild ryegrass and alfalfa Dry matter lb. per acre 1.210 Pounds eaten per ewe daily 3.0 Animal gains. Per Per ewe 24 acre 50 21 35 26 Crested wheatgrass and 1,160 2.8 14 alfalfa Liveweight gains of sheep were greater on Russian wild ryegrass and alfalfa after July than on crested wheatgrass and alfalfa (Figure 4). After September 1, animals on the Russian wild ryegrass-alfalfa mixture con- tinued to gain weight, whereas those on the crested wheatgrass-alfalfa mixture started to lose. The excellent gains on the Russian wild ryegrass- alfalfa mixture were attributed to a higher nutritive value and a slightly greater daily intake. Comparable results have been obtained from grazing tests at Many berries, Alberta. 130-1 125- 120- 100- RUSSIAN WILD RYEGRASS AND ALFALFA CRESTED WHEATGRASS AND ALFALFA 5 1 JUNE JULY -r- 15 1 15 AUG 1 15 SEPT BIO-GRAPHIC UNIT - C* 1 15 OCT KDt, DEPT.OF AGRICULTURE Figure 4 - Four-year average weight of 70 yearling ewes while grazing on Russian wild ryegrass-alfalfa and crested wheatgrass-alfalfa pasture from date following shearing to end of grazing season. The value of Russian wild ryegrass as a well-balanced pasture feed for late summer and fall is also shown by the chemical composition (Table 1). It contains more protein than either crested wheatgrass or bromegrass after the shot-blade stage, and after the mature seed stage its protein content is twice that of crested wheatgrass. Its fat content, important in providing calories late in the fall, is higher than for crested wheatgrass or brome- grass. Russian wild ryegrass contains less carbohydrate than either brome- grass or crested wheatgrass, but is similar in ash and crude fiber content. Table 1. Chemical Compositions of Three Pasture Grasses at Progressive Stages of Development (Average percentages of various constituents in a 2-year test) Constituents Grass Early leaf Shot- blade Flower Mature seed Late fall Next spring Crude protein Russian wild ryegrass 21.1 16.4 11.5 9.4 7.3 7.1 Crested wheatgrass 20.1 14.2 6.4 5.4 3.1 3.4 Bromegrass 20.7 17.1 10.4 7.3 4.5 4.6 Carbohydrates Russian wild ryegrass 42.9 46.6 46.3 44.9 45.7 44.3 (Nitrogen-free extract) Crested wheatgrass 44.7 49.8 55.0 55.7 49.7 47.9 Bromegrass 43.9 46.5 53.1 54.3 49.9 48.3 Fat Russian wild ryegrass 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.2 (Ether extract) Crested wheatgrass 2.2 1.7 1.4 1.7 1.1 0.7 Bromegrass 2.3 2.0 1.5 1.8 1.4 1.0 Ash Russian wild ryegrass 10.2 8.9 8.0 9.2 7.5 8.6 Crested wheatgrass 9.0 7.8 6.0 6.7 7.3 7.8 Bromegrass 10.6 10.0 6.8 8.0 7.8 9.3 Crude fiber Russian wild ryegrass 24.0 26.5 32.8 34.7 37.9 38.8 Crested wheatgrass 24.0 26.4 31.1 30.6 38.8 40.3 Bromegrass 22.4 24.4 28.2 28.5 36.4 37.0 Hay Russian wild ryegrass should not be seeded for hay. It generally yields less than either crested wheatgrass or bromegrass when grown alone or with alfalfa. The average hay yields for Russian wild ryegrass, crested wheat- grass, and bromegrass grown alone and with alfalfa in a number of tests, on a range of soil types, and over several years were: Grass Dry matter yield in tons per acre Alone With alfalfa Russian wild ryegrass Crested wheatgrass Bromegrass 0.57 0.69 0.65 0.96 1.06 1.06 In all hay tests Russian wild ryegrass persisted well and resisted in- vasion by weeds and other grasses. In a study of competition between grasses, in several trials where Russian wild ryegrass was grown in mix- ture with other grasses at Swift Current, it was the only one that competed favorably with crested wheatgrass. '„-;. :;f' #." Figure 5 - A modern farmyard and lawn sown to Russian wild ryegrass, 10 Farmyards and Lawns Russian wild ryegrass is one of the best grasses for farmyards and lawns that cannot be watered (Figure 5). It is leafy, seldom forms stems, and remains green for most of the summer. It recovers quicker after cutting than crested wheatgrass, and because it seldom heads out, does not invade trees and hedges like crested wheatgrass. The sod formed by Russian wild ryegrass is extremely tough and stands considerable abuse from tramping and driving. In tests at Saskatoon and Indian Head, Saskatchewan, it has been more durable than crested wheatgrass. For lawns and small yards broadcast Russian wild ryegrass by hand or with a small cyclone seeder at 3 to 4 pounds of seed per 1,000 square feet. Prepare the seedbed and rake or harrow it before and after seeding to firm the soil and cover the seed. For large areas use a drill. Set the drill at about 15 pounds of seed per acre (1 bushel wheat drill setting) and seed the area in at least two direc- tions at right angles to one another. Be sure to protect the newly sown area during the first season of growth. Avoid walking or driving on it. Do not cut it unless it is very weedy in late June or early July, and then cut as high as possible. Most broad-leaved weeds can be controlled by spraying with 2,4-D. Seed Production Success in growing Russian wild ryegrass for seed depends on the fol- lowing factors: seeding, fertilizing, irrigating, removing aftermath, harvest- ing, cleaning, and marketing. Seeding Establish seed production fields without using a nurse or companion crop because it reduces the seed yields of the grass for at least the first two years after seeding. Highest yields have been obtained with row spacings of 2 feet or more (Table 2). At Swift Current the best yields were obtained when the grass was grown in 3- and 4-foot spacings. At Lacombe, Alberta, in a moister climate, the grass yielded best in 2-foot spacings. As it is difficult to culti- vate between rows in 2-foot spacings, a 3-foot spacing is recommended for all locations (Figure 6). Studies at Indian Head, Saskatchewan, showed that good seed crops can be produced when three closely spaced rows are alternated with a fallow strip 3 to 4 feet wide. The three rows provide a good place to lay the swath and the fallow strip ensures enough moisture to produce a crop of seed. 11 '} * Figure 6 - A field of Russian wild ryegrass sown for seed production in rows 3 feet apart. Fertilizing Under average moisture conditions it pays to fertilize (Table 2). Table 2. Average Seed Yields of Russian Wild Ryegrass on Three Dryland Sites at Various Rates of 16-20-0 Fertilizer (Pounds per acre for rows 1 to 4 feet apart) Feet between Fertilizer Swift Saskatoon Lacombe rows pounds per acre Current 7 years 4 years 5 years 1 0 23 101 216 135 59 — 255 250 99 - 268 2 0 80 _ 353 135 138 — 417 250 242 - 406 3 0 105 128 367 135 165 — 367 250 230 - 389 4 0 116 _ 334 135 208 — 359 250 222 — 257 12 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5 th 6 th 7th 58 168 193 133 81 72 32 76 167 218 215 144 280 52 80 254 284 281 222 365 127 With heavy rates of fertilizer annually, good yields of seed can be ob- tained continuously for many years from a single seeding. In a 7-year test at Swift Current fertilizer increased the yields more as the stand aged. The seed yields of Russian wild ryegrass, in pounds per acre, over a 7- year period at Swift Current, sown in rows 3 feet apart and fertilized an- nually with 16-20-0, were: Fertilizer lb, per acre 0 135 250 Evidently the soil nitrogen became progressively less available each year. The percentage increases for the 250-pounds per acre application from the first to the seventh year, respectively, were: 38, 51, 47, 111, 174, 407, and 297. The time of fertilizer application is important also. At Swift Current, seed yields were twice as great from an August application as from a spring application at the same rate. At Lacombe, the early-fall application of fertilizer gave 16 percent higher seed yield than a similar one in the spring. Therefore, apply the fertilizer immediately after harvesting the seed crop. The fertilizer required for good seed production depends on the soil. At Swift Current on loam soil, evidently phosphorus is not needed and the most economical fertilizer is ammonium nitrate (33.5-0-0). The ammonium nitrate has twice as much nitrogen per pound as ammonium phosphate (16-20-0) and, pound for pound, it is cheaper. At present, the recommended fertilizer to apply for high seed production in the Brown and Dark Brown soil zones is ammonium nitrate at 100 to 150 pounds per acre. But, on Black soils, am- monium phosphate at 300 pounds per acre may give more economical re- sults. Irrigating In dry years some growers obtain good seed yields by using water from sloughs, dugouts, or other sources for sprinkler irrigation. Although the timing of irrigation has not been studied extensively, observations suggest that this water can be used most economically by irrigating in August and again in early May. Where only one irrigation is possible, apply the water in early May. The 7-year average seed yields when two fertilizers were applied on irrigated plots at Pambrun, Saskatchewan, were: 13 Fertilizer Check 33.5-0-0 33.5-0-0 16-20-0 16-20-0 Seed yield lb. /acre Fertilizer lb. /acre (1955-61). None 160 75 226 150 244 150 204 300 267 Aftermath The leafy residue remaining after the seed has been harvested is nutri- tious and makes excellent feed for livestock. Experiments at Swift Current showed that removal of the aftermath forage is essential to maintain high seed yields. When sheep grazed the aftermath there was an increase in seed yield the following year. The sooner grazing commences after harvest, the greater the increase in seed yield (Figure 7). The grower who does not utilize the aftermath can expect lower seed yields and is wasting valuable pasture. ouu - LU £ 400 ■ < oc LU Q_ S 300- z 3 O Q_ o 200 - _i HI >- Q LU lu 100- □ ■ GRAZING COMMENCED IN JULY IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEED HARVEST GRAZING COMMENCED SEPT. 1 GRAZING COMMENCED OCT. 1 CHECK - NOT GRAZED 1962 1963 (YEAR OF HARVEST) BIO-GRAPHIC UNIT - CANADA DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE Figure 7 - Seed yields of Russian wild ryegrass in 1962 and 1963 as in- fluenced by grazing after seed harvest during the preceding year. 14 Harvesting Russian wild ryegrass shatters its seed readily and must be cut before it is dead ripe. The best time to harvest is when the straw is golden yellow and the seed in the firm dough stage. The best method of harvesting is to swath the crop just above the leafy basal growth and then thresh with a combine several days later (Figure 8). By this method the crop can be harvested at an earlier stage with much less loss in germination than when it is straight combined. If the crop is straight combined, good quality seed can be obtained in the 2 to 3 days before the seed shatters, and it must be dried artificially. Swathing and combining later allows harvesting to take place over a longer period, eliminates the need for artificial drying, and insures high germination. However, cutting more than 6 days before maturity will result in low kernel weight and lower yield. Although swathing is the better method of harvesting, some difficulty has been experienced in picking up the swath when it falls between the rows. One grower has solved this problem by seeding the field at an angle, and swathing it by going around the field so that all swaths cross the rows at an angle. Another farmer arranged his field by seeding two rows one foot apart where the swath would fall; a self-propelled swather facilitated placing the swath on the double rows. 100i 80- < 60 on lu 40- o 20 H 0 ~T~2 SWATHED STRAIGHT COMBINED t 1 1 r i 1 1 r 34567 89 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 DATE OF HARVESTING BIO-GRAPHIC UNIT - CANADA DEPT.OF AGRICULTURE Figure 8 - Germination of Russian wild ryegrass seed when harvested by two methods on successive dates from July 3 to 17. 15 Russian wild ryegrass can be threshed successfully with a combine. The rub-bar cylinder types are more suitable than the tooth cylinder types because they do not break up the straw so much. Correct combine adjust- ments come by trial and error and vary with the make of machine. The fol- lowing suggestions may be helpful: • At the start set the cylinder the same as for wheat. If the straw is broken too much, so that a great deal of it comes into the hopper with the seed, in- crease the clearance between the cylinder and the concaves. You may need to open up the cylinder as wide as possible. If this does not give the de- sired effect, slow the cylinder down slightly. Be careful not to slow it too much because this reduces the capacity of the combine and tends to plug it when large wads come in. • Set the adjustable sieves V3 to Vi open. You can find the best setting only by repeated trials. • To clean the seed properly slow down the fan as much as possible and adjust the wind control doors. Generally, shut the doors and with some machines insert pieces of cardboard to reduce the air intake. • Direct the air blast toward the front of the sieves. This provides for better separation and avoids blowing seed over the back. • You may have to slow down the operating speed of the pickup because high speed may cause excessive shattering and loss of seed. Cleaning The ordinary fanning mill usually cleans the seed well enough to seed through a drill but doesn't remove all weed seeds. An indent disc with ap- propriate discs is necessary to remove them. If you try to remove all weed seeds with the fanning mill, a lot of good grass seed may be lost. Metal sheet screens are more suitable than wire screens for cleaning any grass seed. The wire screens plug up too easily and it is necessary to remove and clean them frequently. Scalp the seed over a round-hole wheat or barley screen before cleaning. The scalping removes parts of heads and about 90 percent of the broken straw. A 15/64 or 16/64-inch round-hole screen is satisfactory. For cleaning, a slotted screen 1/14 x 1/4 inch on top and 1/20-inch round-hole at the bottom is usually satisfactory. Depending on the quality of the seed, it may be necessary to use screens larger or smaller than these. If cleaning equipment is not available on the farm, the seed can be cleaned at a commercial seed cleaning plant. It is best to make the ar- rangements well before harvest. Marketing Most of the seed is sold to commercial seed houses. The seed is in good demand for local use and export, and most seed companies handle it. If you grow a large quantity of seed it is advisable to invest in cleaning machinery 16 and clean the seed yourself. If you have a small quantity of seed it may be marketed through commercial seed houses in uncleaned form. There is a charge for cleaning the seed, and the dockage increases the cost of ship- ping. Fifty-pound sacks are the easiest to handle; larger ones are awkward. Also, many sales are made in multiples of 50 pounds. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Some of the information in this publication was supplied by the following officers of the Research Branch: R.P. Knowles, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan; E. Buglass, Indian Head, Saskatchewan; R.W. Peake, Lethbridge, Alberta; and A.T.H. Gross, Brandon, Manitoba. OTHER HELPFUL INFORMATION Campbell, J.B. 1961. Continuous versus repeated-seasonal grazing of grass- alfalfa mixtures at Swift Current, Saskatchewan. J. Range Mgmt. 14: 72-77. Campbell, J.B., R.W. Lodge, A. Johnston, and S. Smoliak. 1962. Range management of grasslands and adjacent parklands in the Prairie Pro- vinces. Can. Dep. Agr. Pub. 1133. Heinrichs, D.H., and R.B. Carson. 1956. Chemical composition of nine grasses at six stages of development. Can. J. Agr. Sci. 36: 95-106. Kilcher, M.R., and D.H. Heinrichs. 1964. The comparative suitability of some grasses for turf in southern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 44: 208-211. Lawrence, T. 1960. Quality of Russian wild ryegrass seed as influenced by time and method of harvesting. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40: 474-481. Lawrence, T. 1963. Seed yield of Russian wild ryegrass grown on an ir- rigated clay soil in southwestern Saskatchewan. J. Range Mgmt. 16: 311-312. Lawrence, T., and J.E. Troelsen. 1964. An evaluation of 15 grass species as forage crops for southwestern Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 44: 301-310. Lawrence, T., and R. Ashford. 1964. Seed yield and morphological develop- ment of Russian wild ryegrass as influenced by grazing. Can. J. Plant Sci. 44: 311-317. Lawrence, T., and R. Ashford. 1964. Russian wild ryegrass, a dual pur- pose crop. Research for Farmers. Vol. 9, No. 4: 8-9. (Can. Dep. Agr.). Lawrence, T., and M.R. Kilcher. 1964. Effect of time of fertilizer appli- cation on the seed and forage yield of Russian wild ryegrass. J. Range Mgmt. 17: 272-273. 17 Ruuser, W.S., and W.L. Crowle, 1963. Salt tolerance of Russian wild rye- grass in relation to tall wheatgrass and slender wheatgrass. Can. J. Plant Sci. 43: 397-407. Rogler, G.A., and H.M. Schaaf. 1963. Growing Russian wildrye in the Wes- tern States. U.S. Dep. Agr. Leaflet 524. Stelfox, H.B., D.ll. Heinrichs, and R.P. Knowles, 1954. Seed production studies with Russian wild-rye. Can. J. Agr. Sci. 34: 28-35. Thaine, R. 1954. The effect of clipping frequency on the productivity and root development of Russian wild ryegrass in the field. Can. J. Agr. Sci. 34: 299-304. Troelsen, J.E., and J.B. Campbell. 1959. Nutritional quality of forage crops adapted to southwestern Saskatchewan as determined by their digestibility and dry matter intake when fed to sheep. Can. J. Plant Sci. 39: 417-430. 18 BIBLIOTHEQUE K1A 0C5 AGRICULTURE CANADA OTTAWA 3 T073 000b5Q51 7 Copies of this publication may be obtained from: INFORMATION DIVISION CANADA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OTTAWA First printed 1956 Reprinted 1958 Revised 1966 Roger Duhamel, 6M— 33367— 5:66 Queen's Printer and Controller of Stationery, Ottawa, 1966 A53-991