bye te? th ry ney) rr aL - He A Ke eat we ye Nias yee Mh yeti TOON Si reatizees ripe Rete Pee e Rata ‘ Rina Ree te ms set ieee oe 5} ‘ hse Sea te we “aby Se Ly 4e 4 water aes farehate sty y 53 one %s DF haf Se Pmeaerians tae cite Ae A AA oF ‘| a 4 i is ’ a ih al : * . i} hi . 7. ¥ * i iy ' 7 * ‘ ; M oy aati a he lal i ah ; hi ; a | Pn ai : 4 DA - oe els @ ts RADE } ' { : e es Th ‘ nun THE ANNALS AND MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY, INCLUDING ZOOLOGY, BOTANY, ann GEOLOGY. (BEING A CONTINUATION OF THE ‘ MAGAZINE OF BOTANY AND ZOOLOGY,’ AND OF LOUDON AND CHARLESWORTH'S ‘MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. ) CONDUCTED BY Sir W. JARDINE, Bart.—P. J. SELBY, Esa., Dr. JOHNSTON, DAVID DON, KEsea., Pror. Bor. Kine’s Couu, Lonp., AND RICHARD TAYLOR, F.L.S. eee eee VOE.- VIE: Bs ig LLLIELELELELEL_OOEOEOEOEEOES LONDON: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY R. AND J. E. TAYLOR. SOLD BY S. HIGHLEY; SIMPKIN AND MARSHALL; SHERWOOD AND CO.: W. woop, TAVISTOCK STREET; BAILLIERE, REGENT STREET, AND PARIS: LIZARS, AND MACLACHLAN AND STEWART, EDINBURGH: CURRY, DUBLIN: AND ASHER, BERLIN. 1841. ‘‘Omnes res create sunt divine sapientiz et potentiz testes, divitiz felicitatis humane: exharum usu bonitas Creatoris; ex pulchritudine sapientia Domini; ex ceconomia in conservatione, proportione, renovatione, potentia majestatis elucet. Earum itaque indagatio ab hominibus sibi relictis semper estimata; a vere eruditis et sapientibus semper exculta; male doctis et barbaris semper inimica fuit.”— LINN. CONTENTS OF VOL. VII. NUMBER XLI. Page I. Considerations respecting Spur-shaped Nectaries, and those of the : Aquilegia vulgaris in particular. By M. Cu. Morren, Professor in ordinary at the University of Liége, Member of the Royal Academy of PemeRBEN ee Core CVVIP HSENLG.)) «canccsscacener soavesonsspssedoteuoncsseaseetee 1 IT. On the Fungi of the Neighbourhood of Bristol. By Mr. H. O. BORHIERRERNG Goniec coe quo ce suas soievoie ives ncn anelqnennaiyasiea sare aurea nas sedeaewase 17 III. Description of Four Bats taken in Cuba, By Dr. Grunptacu 19 IV. Horz Zoologice. By Sir W. Jarpine, Bart. :— Remarks on the Structure and Habits of Lepidosiren annec- TELS sconpnacatccadoocoacd asss0conpoadadooosdNcOsNOSoNSaSIsDETORCGOseS 21 V. Commentary on Mr. G. R. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds,’ 1840. By Pee STRICKLAND, Bisg., MOA G52, Cpa wana ca oate antdeien seis oueawereos 26 VI. Mr. Suuckarp on his falsely alleged participation in Mr. Swain- Ronaiviews of Natural Arrangement © ........ccccssscscserccocrcsscecrecsee 41 VII. Excerpta Botanica, or abridged Extracts translated from the Foreign Journals, illustrative of, or connected with, the Botany of Great Britain. By W. A. Leicuton, Esq., B.A., F.B.S.E., &c. On the Anther of Chara vulgaris and Chara hispida, and the Animalcules contained in it. By M. Gustavus Tourer... 44 VIII. Notes on Saxifraga umbrosa: By Cuarues C, Basrneton, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S., &c.; and by the Reviewer of Baines’s ‘ York- RMIPEL RNA eee ma erae cece caoncsdem Conse aansbes sawed swans ose eiaccesiocces sicacusiea 47 IX. Notes on Birds. By T. C. Eyron, Esq., F.L.S.:—Menura Dee ieee tesa carane see ete as eaidaecectriesncncntenaceedesisseea ssa Stee SooL Sonor 48 New Books :—An Introduction to the modern Classification of Insects, founded on the Natural Habits and corresponding Organization of the different Families, by J. O. Westwood, F.L.S., &c.—Otia fuspanica,. suctore P= B.Webb;: No; -2.)scc.s2ceccsccsneccecestsose 53—58 Proceedings of the Zoological Society ; Geological Society; Microsco- PIERS OCICRY cisc-cesena se naseamree sors iconastcesbacnscssoeaeveren™ anes 58—74 Absorption of Liquid Solutions by the Sap-vessels of Plants; Congrés Scientifique de France; Mr. Thompson on Eels killed by the late Frost ; Obituary—Francis Bauer, Esq. ; Mr. Paget on Halicherus Gryphus ; Meteorological Observations and Table ............48. 74—80 lv CONTENTS. NUMBER XLII. X. Contributions to British Actinology. By Epwarp ForseEs, M.W.S., For. Sec. B.S., &c. (With a Plate.) ......:ssseseesceeeeesereeeeee 81 XI. Description of some new Species and four new Genera of Rep- tiles from Western Australia, discovered by John Gould, Esq. By J. E. GRAY, Esq., F.R.S., 826. ...ssccecsceccccscnccsccennnreccceosssanccersoscnce 86 XII. Description of some new Species of Madeiran Fishes, with ad- ditional information relating to those already described. By the Rev. R. T. Lowe, M.A. .....0cccceescccecsssecscscscncecaccecscececsess ee seeenaecse 92 XIII. On the Species of Stickleback (Gasterosteus, Linn.) found in Ireland. By Ww. Tuompson, Vice-Pres. Nat. Hist. Society of Belfast 95 XIV. Notice of Plants and Animals found in the Sulphureous Waters of Harrowgate and Askern, Yorkshire. By E. Lankester, INEST, He Litsisy OCC. iestaceoccecess coccsbiocess sense anne seiernnrnes case coreeeaneeer ce 105 XV. Remarks upon the Recent and Fossil Cycadez. By J. Morris, ISG ie ceesaste curcnsenscmetccss tos scoseesdcscoceacsans ApunsasdeSboRocbonebodcSaend200¢ 110 XVI. Carabideous Insects collected by Charles Darwin, Esq., during the Voyage of Her Majesty’s Ship Beagle. By G. R. Warernouss, Esq. XVII. Observations on a Keratose Sponge from Australia. By J. S. Bowerzanx, Esq, F.G.S. (With a Plate.)....0-cscscsecesoscesesseeseos 129 XVIII. Notices of Nuropean Herbaria, particularly those most in- teresting to the North American Botanist ........sccsseseeseeecereneeeens 132 New Books :—Monographie des Libellulidées d’Europe, par Edm. De Selys Longchamps, Membre de plusieurs Sociétés savantes......... 141 Proceedings of the Entomological Society ; Zoological Society ; Royal Botanical Society of Edinburgh; Wernerian Natural History So- Cletyief Edinburg s.cccneteecs secs tdvacre sore freon Basu aeet 143—159 Mr. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds ;’ Birds of Kent ; Meteorological Observa- fons: B00. Vablevess.css cassie. cncesesiaues seule ten sapncesemes tee 159—160 NUMBER XIJIII. X1X. On the Alteration which the Atmosphere undergoes during the Development of Heat in the Spadix of Colocasia odora. By Pro- fessors) G.. JV ROLIK. ANG Wieekl Re NiR TERE i ois ccc snemada gs deregeeeneaawerts 161 XX. Note on the Occurrence of the Genus Diphya on the Coast of Ireland. By G. C. Hynpman, Esq., Member of the Natural History Society of Belfast ............ webinienieniecitsece a+ asse or =i cesicpa ane andeep ones 164 XXI. Report of the Results of Researches in Physiological Botany made in the year 1839. By the late F. J. Meyvzen, M.D., Professor of Botany. in the University of Berlin’ ¢.:.scns-0s--cseseeeceseetaseeeeseereee 166 XXII. Notes on Birds. By T. C. Eyron, Esq., F.L.S.......000..000 107 XXIII. Notices of European Herbaria, particularly those most in- teresting to the North American Botanist!™. aitcice.catec tee cos ane eectee 179 CONTENTS. Vv Page XXIV. Excerpta Botanica, or abridged Extracts translated from the Foreign Journals, illustrative of, or connected with, the Botany of Great Britain. By W. A. Lercurton, Esq., B.A., F.B.S.E., &c. On the Development of the Reproductive Organs of the Mis- seltoe (Viscum album, Linn.). By M. Decaisne ......... 185 XXV. On the Origin of some of the Lower Forms of Vegetation. Biya Mae) Elen Oxia STEPHENS 26.0.505.50d 2 secesescncesedessdeses ce eta 190 XXVI. An Amended List of the Species of the Genus Ovis. By IDR AE BelsWE My ESQ on csuconconses vac sustiensraresswmenaspaoneceas ase sdeneete sts 195 XXVII. Addenda to the Flora of Norfolk. By Mr. 8. P. Woopwarp 201 XXVIII. On the Formation of the Stomata. By Huco Mont. (WWE HAP abe \e ct hy. srccpes Sansenmevanean bassevdsacmcctgeatnessicedecnenh ematioe 206 New Books:—The Natural History of South Devon, by J.C. Bellamy, Esq—Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di To- PIGOS chee cece vocareretecsascecesseeach overs ste csaetcaronaereese boss. 209—211 Proceedings of the Microscopical Society; Botanical Society of Edin- burgh; Linnean Society; Geological Society; Zoological So- CHL ena caiowiitanacnsdcsnamecss iad eassWinscisasaaessaesasenscsescesaess 211—234 Zoological Observations at Tenby, by Dr. Davis (with a Plate); Mr. Jennings on Eels killed by Frost; On the Occurrence of Anemone ranunculoides, by the Rev. W. Hincks; On the Irish localities for Dianthus plumarius, by W. T. Alexander, Esq.; Suicidal Powers of Luidia ; Meteorological Observations and Table ......... 234—240 NUMBER XLIV. XXIX. On the Anatomy of Nautilus. By M. VaLenciennes...... 241 XXX. Remarks on Red and Green Snow. By the late Prof. Meyen 245 XXXI. An Amended List of the Species of the Genus Ovis. By Epwarp Brytn, Esq.......... Sncibadoced cdc ane onic Wages sae ateninse Mina ooraceonc ee 248 XXXII. Notes on some of the smaller British Mammalia, including the Description of a New Species of 4rvicola, found in Scotland. By fheveves UEONARDIGENYNSs- ME AGs Peli GLC.) on seceecciecsieeeisec’essienisetns 261 XXXIII. Supplement to a Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. By Artuur Hitt Hassatt, Esq. Read before the Natural History So- ciety of Dublin, November 6th, 1840 ............ Reelseaa dase aae a PoE COe 276 XXXIV. List of Phanerogamous Plants, together with the Crypto- gamic Orders Filices, Equisetacee, and Lycopodiacee, observed in the Shetland Islands. By Tuomas Epmonpsron, Jun., Esq. .......+.2.004- 287 XXXV. On the Composition of Chalk Rocks and Chalk Marl by in- visible Organic Bodies: from the Observations of Dr. Ehrenberg. By Tuomas Weaver, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S., M.R.L.A., &c. &e. ......2.0000 296 XXXVI. Description of a South American Wasp which collects Honey. By Mr. Avam Wuirs, M.E.S., Assistant in the Zoological Department of the British Museum. (With a Plate.) ......sesseeecseee 315 vi CONTENTS. Page XXXVII. Information respecting Zoological and Botanical Tra- vellers:—Mr. Schomburgk.—Letter from Messrs. Forbes and Thomp- son, with Captain Graves, in the Archipelago .............- Ficocvdceserwsed 348 New Books :—The Principles of Botany, by W. Hughes Willshire, M.D.—Arcana Entomologica, or Illustrations of new, rare, and interesting Exotic Insects, by J. O. Westwood, F.L.S., &c.; Na- turhistorisk Tidskrift: edited by Henrik Kroyer, Copenhagen.— Tijdschrift voor Natuurlijke Geschiedenis en Physiologie, by Pro- fessors Van der Hoeven and De Vriese. Part VI. Leyden. 322—326 Proceedings of the Geological Society ; Zoological Society; Werne- rian Society ; Royal Society of Edinburgh ..............:.s000e 326—348 Mr. Yarrell on Motacilla alba of Linnzeus; Mr. Johnson on Chetura ruficollis ; Meteorological Observations and Table............ 350—352 NUMBER XLV. XXXVIII. On the Existence of Brauchiz in the young Cecilie ; and on a Modification and Extension of the Branchial Classification of the Amphibia. By Joun Hoae, Esq., M.A., F.R.S., &e. ......eeeeeee «. 303 XXXIX. Supplement to a Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. By Artuur Hirt Hassarz, Esq. Read before the Natural History So- ciety of Dublin, November 6th, 1840. (With Plates). ..... .....cseeeee 363 XL. On the Composition of Chalk Rocks and Chalk Marl by invi- sible Organic Bodies : from the Observations of Dr. Ehrenberg. By Tuomas Weaver, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S., M.R,T.A., &c. &c. .....cc0res. 374 XLI. Report of the Results of Researches in Physiological Botany made in the year 1839. By the late F. J. Meyun, M.D., Professor of Botanyanithe University of" Berlin :...2sssss0acceseoces codes anes ssc scadeeee 399 XLII. On the Urari, the Arrow Poison of the Indians of Guiana; with a description of the Plant from which it is extracted. By Roserr PE MOMBURGK, WEQs” cerrccedasncucettcsctnssneadas-eseaccasersartancereroren 407 XLIII. A List of the Fossil Shells found in a Fluvio-Marine Deposit at Clacton in Essex. By Joun Brown, Esq., F.G.S. .........scesseseeees 427 New Books :—On the Relation between the Holy Scriptures and some parts of Geological Science, by J. Pye Smith, D.D.—The Cer- tainties of Geology, by W. Sidney Gibson, F.G.S.—Linnza, ein Journal fiir die Botanik, &e.—Icones Fungorum hucusque cogni- LONE sre reisos\cteisleresleleceis eres coop dEad anqnodoocaqtonbenDUDSOgsEDSOSDOLCOR 429—434 Proceedings of the Entomological Society ; Linnzean Society ... 434—444 Third Meeting of the Men of Science of Italy ; Dr. Lush on the Madi, or Chili Oil-seed, Madia sativa; Diurnea Novembris, or Novem- ber Dagger ; Meteorological Observations and Table ...... 445—448 CONTENTS. vii Page NUMBER XLVI. XLIV. On Gloionema paradoxum. By the Rev. M. J. Berketey, RIN epi classe wesens vaaetaccess seencheceesss Anccigc daonndsaploooe ceADaDE sou sence 449 XLV. Supplement to descriptions of Exotic Fungi in ‘ Annals of Nat. Hist.,’ vol. iii. pp. 322 and 375. By the Rev. M. J. Berxexey, WV See U So ons wenecinene anes ee aiccc semanas cas csisne dens sesicens ceuisens ss dileissiesc 451 XLVI, A List of Plants collected by Charles Fellows, Esq., during his Tour in Lycia and Caria ; with descriptions of the New Species. By Daviv Don, Esq., Prof. Bot. King’s College ...........scsseceseeseeees 454 XLVII. Report of the Results of Researches in Physiological Botany made in the year 1839. By the late F. J. Meyven, M.D., Professor of Botany mi) the University of Berlin: so. ..cecs..c0cscacscase+s ube nan esnaesos 460 XLVIII. Descriptions of new or little known Arachnida. By Mr. Ava Wuirte, Assistant in the Zoological Department of the British MuUSCUM xe occscs.sconeracsene biweeees “Gaaneddasnnbon- Sebbsec caasoaedBeapsce Sieben 471 XLIX. Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. By Wa. Tuomrson, Esq., Vice-Pres. Natural History Society of Belfast ...... Baaceseasmcasae 477 L. Description of two new Genera of Irish Zoophytes. By Artuur Hirt Hassatt, Esq., Corresponding Member of the Natural History Occ humor DITA eeacrtadtsnest. assacheeRseNe Nec ucailsweswctcessinesseccundeacsaae 483 LJ“ Noteson Birds. By T. C. Eyron, Bsq.; POLS: 2............ Sanco. CHS LIT. A Catalogue of Fossil Fish in the Collections of the Eart or Enniskinuen, F.G.S., &c., and Sir Puitre Grey Ecerton, Bart., F.R.S., &c. ..... Shep COREOS aU SEER Seed GEG EER SAREE Aenea onc oa a uenBe Bea peonenay 487 LIII. Information respecting Zoological and Botanical Travellers :— Mr. Forbes and Mr. Thompson.—Mr. Schomburgk.—Mr. W. S. Mac- Beayi reves eeteseek Sencha beh tae Baldenlestuicatias -sicede clic seismelicloweetctcnene es eniae 520 New Books :—Natural History as a Branch of General Education, by, Robert Patterson, Bsdo-.-ssc.csssccocenedsrseecedseeusuarosvencee ses -- 498 Proceedings of the Zoological Society ; Geological Society ...... 503—519 New Genus of Mexican Glirine Mammalia; On a new European Ge- nus of Freshwater Fish, by F. Heckel; Forbes’s Starfishes, Echi- nus lividus; Speaking Canary Bird; Birds of Kent; Emberiza Hortulana; Diluvial [ Glacial ?] Scratches on Rocks in America; Mr. Shuckard on the Proceedings of the Entomological Society ; Obituary—C. S. Rafinesque; Meteorological Observations and TAD ery cmccnssccs ss eseradeeeeasacns se SE CACKCHH HEC BS SCE DCO octenine saan 521—528 NUMBER XLVII. SUPPLEMENT. Proceedings of the Royal Society ; Linnzean Society; Entomological Society ; Zoological Society ......... Saaieaienaseileieiaieite penaenedeaee 529—578 PRGCK: oeer acres econ Sobsess48s4 shoo snbtdnednnos suena sosbeacondses basiseeseciesan 579 ~ Prate I. PLATES IN VOL. VII. British Actiniade. Fig. 1, 2, 3. Cyanea coccinea; (from Tenby.) { Development of Stomata in Hyacinthus orientalis. jWite III. IV. V. . Flustra carnosa *; Hermia glandulosa; Sertularia Margarita ; = ae aS MH SS Trish Zoophytes. “a~ Fig. 4, 5. Helix conoidea; (fossil from Essex.) Horny Sponge from Australia. Nest of Myrapetra scutellaris, a South American Wasp. Horns of various species of Sheep. Sertularia pumila. . Thuiaria articulata. . Plumularia frutescens; Valkeria imbricata; Langenella repens? Valkeria (new species) ; Hippothoa lanceolata. . Cellepora bimucronata ; Lepralia ciliata, appensa, pedilostoma, insignis, cylindrica, punctata, linearis. X. Tubulipora lobulata; Alcyonidium hirsutum; Echinochorium L clavigerum. XI. Metamorphoses of the Spur-shaped Nectaries of Aquilegia vul- garis. XII. Urari Plant, Strychnos toxifera, Schomb. XIII Fruit of the Urari Plant. * | Gloionema paradoxum ; fig. a. (I—8). * In Plate VI. this figure is by mistake given as Coryne squamata. It is, in reality, a representation of Flustra carnosa, Johnston (see p. 369), of which it is a correct figure, with the exception of the number of the tenta- cula, which should have been 30. Erratum, p. 373, line 33, for Coryne sguamata read Flustra carnosa, THE ANNALS AND MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. No. 41. MARCH 1841. I.— Considerations respecting Spur-shaped Nectaries, and those of the Aquilegia vulgaris in particular. By M. Cu. Mor- REN, Professor in ordinary at the University of Liége, Member of the Royal Academy of Brussels, &c.* [With a Plate. ] THE Columbine, that pretty ranunculaceous flower of our woods, deserves attention, as well on account of its structure, curious as it is, and, we venture to add, but little known, as from the historical recollections which it brings to mind. To say nothing here of the medicinal virtues which Dioscorides attributed to his Jsopyron or to his Phasiolon,—a plant which Fabius Columna, Clusius, Dodonzeus and many other learned botanists suppose to be no other than the Columbine itself ; and not to mention Adrian Junius, who also quotes it as a medical plant; or Francois Rapard, a celebrated physician of Bruges, who addressed to Clusius a letter upon its uses in difficult labours ; ought we not to remark that its singular nec- taries, compared by some to the beak and talons of an eagle, by others to the graceful neck of the pigeon, by some to rams’-horns, and by others to capuchins’ hoods, had so gained the attention of the painters of the middle ages, that it be- came one of the favourite flowers, placed in great profusion in the illuminations of missals and manuscripts of the time? The ‘ancoiles’ or the ‘ ancolyes’ were there intermixed with the leaves, flowers, or fruit of the strawberry or of the campanula ; and Memling was most particularly attached to it. When Dodoens wrote his “ Ctupdt-Bork,” the name Aguileia or Aquilina was still a novelty just introduced, he says, by the latest phytographers of his own time. The name Aguilegia * Translated from the original communicated by the Author: B Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries which he gives it calls to mind the comparison already men- tioned, of the beak and talons of an eagle; but since that time that of Columbine prevailed in England and in Holland, where they were fonder of likening the spurred petal of this flower to the stately neck of a pigeon. When one of these flowers is turned upside-down, says an English author *, we might fancy we saw a group of young eagles, or, if we like better, a nest of pigeons. It is evident that these spur-shaped necta- ries had considerable influence on the mind of Dodoens, since on their account he places his Akeleyen (‘ancolies, columbines;) between the Cypripedium Calceolus, a monocotyledonous plant, and his Orant or Antirrhinum majus,—an alliance which would not at all square with our present ideas of classi- fication by families. By a singular chance, the Cypripedium, which in our mythological language we call the Venus’s foot, was at that period of religious struggles called Our Lady’s shoe (Calceolus Marie), and the Columbine was named in its turn the Virgin’s glove: thus we see that shoes and gloves shook hands in our Lady’s toilet. Chief ornament of the gardens of the middle ages, and even of those of the sixteenth century, the 4quilegia, carefully and almost universally cultivated, produced those varieties which modern botanists have pointed out in this species. Joost van Ravelingen, the commentator of Dodoens, and L’Obel+, men- tion the varieties in colour and those of form to be met with in their time: blue, red, flesh-coloured, blue and white, white and variegated. The garden of a gentleman of Leyden, Jean van Hogelande, produced an Aquilegia pleno flore roseo, which Clusius described and illustrated. The same botanist had also recorded a variety truly monstrous (Aquilegia degener), in that the petals, being reduced to their primitive type of leaves, had remained green; only Van Ravelingen did not think that such monstrosities were worth the pains of describing. Now- a-days we should be eager to do it, and not without reason ; for the organography of such a flower is very interesting to know, in relation to the subject which will occupy us further on. The varieties of structure known under the name of Aqui- legia vulgaris corniculata, in which Biriat and DeCandolle § discovered that the cornets are deviations of the anther, * Burnett's Outlines of Botany, p. 840. + Generally written Lobel; but the true name of the author of the Stir- pium Historia was Matthias De L’Obel, as appears from his letters and the portrait engraved during his life-time. { Biria. Monographie des Rénonculacées. Montpellier, 1811, § DeCandolle. Organographie, tom. i. p. 496. of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 3 and those which bear the name of Aquilegia vulgaris ecal- carata or stellata, in which, according to these authors, the petals proceed from modified staminal filaments without an- thers—these varieties had been already described by Clusius, Dodoens and L’Obel*. Moreover, these authors, besides the simple, semi-double and double varieties of these two principal forms (true sub-varieties which we still possess), also mention Columbines with inverted flowers (Aquileia flore inverso variegato). We might suppose, from the Dodonzan context, that it was hereby understood that the flowers, in- stead of being pendent, were upright ..... “Die niet en ber- schillen ban de ander Ban Dat de bloenten aberechts Staen.” But we know that in this variety, the bases of the spurs being twisted, the spur itself has an upward direction. We cannot but take an interest in observing the pleasures of the horticulturists of those times. _Now-a-days these Co- lumbines are treated with disregard, and dismissed as fit only for the garden of the cottager or village Curé, or, at most, are only permitted to grow in the shade of some forgotten nook of our villas; but let us not say too much: fashion, which revives all antiquated things, may some day assert its claim upon these Columbines of the Castels. Already in the Botanic Gar- den at Brussels, we have seen pretty borders entirely filled with this plant of the middle ages. The Columbine is really a very interesting flower, on ac- count of its nectaries; and their genesis not being known, at least so far as we are aware, we have taken them as the prin- cipal subject of our researches: our object has been to study them comparatively in the different varieties of the common species, and in some other species which we had at hand; se- condly, to observe the monstrous structures ; thirdly, to take them at their different degrees of evolution, in order to esta- blish their true genesis; and, lastly, to examine their histo- logy, so as to ascertain how in their forms so varied the in- terior tissues were affected. So long as the laws of metamorphoses had not acquired the right of citizenship in the domains of science, calcariform - nectaries had to be considered as special pieces, born ad hoc, and being such by their proper nature, without an anterior nature, without a type from which they were derived. Although Linnzus had said, “Si nectarium a petalis distinctum, com- muniter ludit ;” he also said, “ distincta esse nectaria a corolla constat exemplis: Aconitum, Aquilegia,’ &c.+.—They were, then, the floral pieces whose secretion of honey determined * Dodoens. Cruydt-Boek, 1644, p. 274, + Linnzi Philosophia Botanica: Fructificatio i, 110. B2 4 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries their character, and that character raised them to the-rank of organs sui generis, not proceeding from any other :—they were, because they were. They were, however, not nectaries, because by their nature they were stamens: here is that truth which science had not then become possessed of. But when, at the end of the last century, Geethe, following the example of Wolff, established his celebrated theory of the metamorphosis of plants, the nectaries at once lost their auto- chthonous nature ; they were no longer aboriginal organs. On the contrary, in this new theory the nectaries became essen- tially organs of transition, mere forms of anterior organs ; they were, in short, intermediary organs of passage between the pe- tals and the stamens*. In the spirit of this philosophic me- thod, it was necessary to understand, that in order for the petal to become a stamen, in an ascending metamorphosis, it must previously pass through the form of a nectary. More- over, Goethe, who took precisely the Columbine as the exam- ple of one of the most remarkable and most striking trans- formations, considered, as he says, the cuculliform nectaries of this flower asaderivation from the petalst. We shall see, on the contrary, that the progress of nature is a descending metamor- phosis ; that is tu say, that the nectary is, in its genesis, a sta- men, and subsidiarily, that a stamen being developed as such, it may afterwards turn into a nectary. The theory of Goethe had made too little impression in France to admit of the supposition, that in 1815 Mirbel set out from it when he regarded the nectaries of the Columbine, as well as all organs of the same kind, as anomalous forms of the parts of the perianthium. The spur-shaped cornets of the Aquilegia were also, in his eyes, forms of petals; but the ano- maly attacking all the petals at once, the flower remained 7e- gular {. It was one of the successive alterations of types, and in the Columbine particularly this alteration was created in order to become an organ of secretion. A glandular lamina existed for this purpose at the bottom of the cornet-shaped petals$. The petal was the type. This lamina we have never found ; and in the Aquilegia glan- dulosa, the Aquilegia atrata, &c., we have seen that there only exist one, or two, or three cornets without the regularity of the flower being perverted, as is the case in the Nasturtium, * Goethe. E£uvres d'Histoire Naturelle. Edition de Martius et Turpin. Paris, 1837, p. 226. + Ibid, p. 228, chap. 56. { Mirbel. Elémens de Physiologie, vol.i. p. 269. § Goethe. Céuvres d’Histoire Naturelle. Edition de Martius. of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 5 Tropeolum, or the Lark’s-spur. The great German poet’s notions had not indeed at first all possible success in this country. Willdenow always asserted that the spur (calcar) was more an organ intended to preserve the nectar than to prepare it, and that it was furthermore a sacciform elongation of the corolline corona*. The first of these facts is evidently erroneous. The second was also admitted by Jacquin. Sprengel, when opposing Vaillant, who had also himself declared that the nectary was always a production of the corolla, placed the spurs of the Columbine in his class of Nec- tarothece, and characterized by the presence of the secreting gland at the bottom of the cornet. Moreover, it never occurred to his mind to investigate the anterior nature of this appara- tus in the Passifloree, in the Aconites, and a multitude of other plants; he sees only peculiar /ittle machines, more or less ornamented: machinule peculiares ...... eleganter co- loratet. DeCandolle, in 1819, adopts this view of the subject; but the spur, according to him, is of a very different nature,— an elongation, one while of the calyx, one while of the corolla, one while of the perigonium; but the stamens are still ex- cluded from the floral organs which may produce this nec- tary {. However, a year before, the celebrated botanist of Ge- neva had positively declared that, in the Aquilegie corniculate, without regard to species, the supplementary spurs arose from a modification of the anthers which lengthened downwards ; moreoyer, he recognises the origin of the stellated varieties from the abortion of the authers, and from the hypertrophy of the filaments ; and lastly, that the scales which are situated between the carpels and the stamens are stamens without anthers, and with dilated and membranous filaments$. Buiria had made known the former facts||. In 1827 these ideas were again brought forward in the Organographie végétale*|. They are, undeniably, the most accordant to the real state of things. Among the most recent authors we may mention Kurr, who places the spurs of the Columbine with his nectarostig- mata. A very curious remark of this accurate writer is, that the greenish glands which secrete the nectar at the bottom of * Willdenow. Grundriss der Krauterkunde, cap. 86-88. (Terminologie.) + Linnezi Phil. Bot. edit. Sprengel (notes). Fructificatio 110. + DeCandolle. Théorie élémentaire, p. 406, § 395. § DeCandolle. Systema Regni Vegetabilis, vol. i. p. 333. || Biria. Histoire naturelle et médicale des Rénoucules, 1 fasc. Montpellier, 1811. §| DeCandolle. Organographie, vol. i. pp. 484—496. 6 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries the spurred cornet, do not begin to afford this sugared liquid until precisely when the first anther blows. The secretion lasts only as long as the stamens are capable of performing their functions, and at the end of three or four days the flower leaves off this ejection of fluid and of pollen, and drops the organs which produced both the one and the other*. This curious remark is quite correct; we have verified it. From this we might be led to suppose that the secretion of the nectar, which is here so intimately connected with the functions of the stamens, becomes necessary to the action of the sexes; but from ten unblown flowers, where there had been neither dehiscence of the anthers, nor secretion of nectar by the spurs, Kurr cut away those organs: the further de- velopment took place without any difference, and these flowers bore as many and as large fruits as they ordinarily do; the seeds germinated as usual}. This experiment gives great support to those who consider the nectar as being only a true excretion, comparable to our urine, and which is of no use, at least in the great majority of cases, in the process of fecun- dation, as was generally supposed. Kurr, however, does not give his opinion as to the proper nature of the spurs. Lindley, in his new edition of the ‘ Introduction to Botany,’ (1839) no longer gives (to the great regret of the friends of deep scientific research) the interesting and useful part on mor- phology; but this judicious author, in his edition of 1832{, had published some very curious details upon the Aquilegia vulgaris. ‘The petals of this plant,” says he, “consist of a long, sessile, purple horn or bag, with a spreading margin, while the stamens consist of a slender filament, bearing a small, oblong, 2-celled, yellow anther. In single and regularly- formed flowers, nothing can be more unlike than the petals and stamens; but in double flowers the transition is complete. The petals which first begin to change, provide themselves with slender ungues: the next contract their margin, and acquire a still longer unguis: in the next the purple margin disappears entirely ; two yellow lobes like the cells of the anther take its place, and the horn, diminished in size, no longer proceeds from the base, as in the genuine petal, but from the apex of the now filiform unguis: in the last transi- tion the lobes of the anther are more fully formed, and the horn is almost contracted within the dimensions of the con- nective, retaining, however, its purple colour: the next stage * Kurr. Untersuchungen tiber die Bedeutung, &c. Stutgard, 1833. f Ubid} pp. 128: { Lindley. Introduction to Botany (1832), p. 515.—[Ed. 1835, p. 536.] of the Aquilegia vulgaris, r§ is the perfect stamen. No further evidence,” says our author, “can, I think, be required of the formation of stamens out of petals.” We see that Lindley had here followed the impulse given by Geethe, and that he looked upon the cuculliform petals (Richard) as proceeding towards the formation of the stamina by an ascending metamorphosis. At present the spur is no longer in his view anything but a modified petal*. A dis- covery which we cannot dispute with him, since the germ of it appears in his words, is that the horn of the Columbine is really a lengthened connective,—a thing which we shall also establish by direct proofs hereafter. Although G. W. Bischoff, Professor of Botany at Heidel- berg, does not give this morphological genesis of the spur in the Aquilegia, still this author helps to lead us to believe that this is really the means which nature employs, in what he has remarked respecting the metamorphosis of the nectar- bearing horns of the Helleborus fctidus into normal stamenst. Link sees nothing in the spur but a continuation of the petal, characterized by the presence, at the end of its cavity, of a cellular gland, but of which the cellules have walls thicker than ordinary,—a thing which we take the liberty of not admitting}. After M. Vogel of Bonn had sent me his elegant memoir on the development of the parts of the flower in the Leguminose§, the study of the formation of calcariform or cuculliform nectaries, according to the glosso- logy of Richard||, became still more interesting. Indeed, Schleiden and Vogel having proved, by their Jabours, that it is not merely in idea, as a mental abstraction, that we are to see in the floral organs nothing but the axis of the plant and its leaves, but that this axis and its green leaves are really and substantially found, placed regularly in the very small buds, we thought that the investigation of the genesis of the nectaries in the Columbine could not be without scientific interest. DeCandolle came to consider these horn-shaped nectaries as anthers, by comparison; Lindley came to the same conclusion by the observation of teratological cases ; it was become therefore curious to test these views @ priori and @ posteriori by organogenic proofs: and this is what we have proposed to ourselves. * Lindley. Introduction to Botany (1839), p. 169. + Gottlob Wilhelm Bischoff. Lehrbuch der Botanik, vol. i. p. 404. (1833.) ¢ Link. Elementa Philosophie Botanice, vol. ii. p. 130. § Schleiden und Vogel. Beitrage zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Blu- mentheile bei den Leguminosen. (Act. Nat. Curios. vol. xix. p. 1.) || Richard. Nouv. Elémens de Botanique, 1888, p. 333. 8 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries Let us see, first, what takes place m a flower of Aquilegia vulgaris calcarata. 1. Metamorphosis of the stamen into a spur-shaped nectary. The stamen of the Columbine has a thread-shaped filament slender, flexible and yellow, and a two-celled anther with pa- rallel cells, slightly swelled, opening with a slit and united by a narrow connective, the whole yellow. The connective is even hardly visible (Plate XI. fig. 1). In many flowers, we find along the spire which leads in- sensibly from the androeceum to the corolla, stamens which turn into nectaries. To bring this about, the filament en- larges at its base; the connective is, at the opposite pole, the other organ which becomes modified, and it is even the most active of all in this transformation. It enlarges above, by separating the two loculi of the anther, and it grows to a point. This is not slow in becoming bifurcate, so that the connective is soon bilobate. (Figs. 2 and 7.) To this modification, which up to this period does not at- tack the regularity of the organ, two ways of transformation succeed, In the one, one of the loculi of the anther disap- pears, in the other it remains visible with its fellow. The first of these modifications might induce a belief that the spur as a sac formed by one half of an anther or by a loculus, but this genesis is but a deceitful appearance. The second way of transformation proves that the spur is a sac-shaped con- nective, and that the two lobes of its limb represent the two loculi of the anther originally united by this same connective. If such a spur-shaped nectary can be obtained, as from its nectar-secreting gland is truly a nectary, and that im it the two lobes of its limb exist as an elongation of the two an- ther-cells, still visible enough to attest their presence, it is clear that this second way of transformation should be ad- mitted. Now this is precisely what experience confirms. In the Columbine we find this form, not so frequently as the first, it is true; but it is found, and that is all that is neces- sary. This case we have delineated (Plate VII. fig.6). Ona stamen thus modified, besides a well-formed filament (c h), we find the two loculi of the anther, still bearing pollen, but which open more widely (a 4), separated by a small connec- tivaleminence (c). Each of the swellings which represent the anther-cells produces an elongation in form of a thick margin (e), which, reaching from the inside to the outside, goes to form the circumference of the two lobes of the cornet (d g), separated by aslit (/). Each lobe corresponds to a cell, and originates from it; it is only indeed that same cell length- of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 9 ened. Lastly, 7 represents the belly of the cornet, and at * we find the gland which, for its part, secretes whilst the pollen no longer issues from the loculi, and little by little its struc- ture is annihilated. This case of metamorphosis not only proves, as we said above, that the two lobes of the cornet of the Columbine are derivations from the cells of the anther, but it puts out of doubt that the tube of the cornet is the lengthened connective. A circumstance which we must not lose sight of in this phi- losophic study of a metamorphosed flower, is that the nectar- bearmg gland, an organ of emission, and which rids the flower of its excess of carbon, is found at the opposite pole to the pollen-bearing loculi, other organs of emission which also excrete from the individual, but in this case for the pre- servation of the species, a substance eminently charged with carbon. At the two poles then the same function exists, but the one does not begin till the other ceases; that is to say, the nectarial gland does not exist or become developed until the pollen apparatus wastes away and becomes obsolete. This subject certainly merits a reflection; even should I be accused of seeing, in Botany, more than my own eyes can see, and especially should I be accused of allowing to myself, in a science of observation, some stretch of imagination. For my part, I could never comprehend how inquiry into the truths of nature should put aside the understanding, and reduce it to a state of inaction which would render it useless. Be- hind and above facts I always conceive something superior and anterior; for facts are effects, and it is to the know- ledge of causes that we ought to endeavour to come. Now here, in the particular problem which occupies us, I see a verification of the law of organic compensation and a realiza- tion of the unity of composition. Thus, the nectaries are ONE with the stamens, the stamens ONE with the leaves, the leaves ONE with themselves, as autochthonous organs. So much for the law of unity. Moreover, the gland is at the end of the nectary, because, by its nature a stamen, the pollen is at the other end; there is a change in the product, but not a change of nature, and by the side of this law of polarity there is that of compensation; for, in proportion as the anther-cell closes to render the pollen adortive, there is a development of the gland which begins to secrete the nectar; the evolution of the gland brings on the atrophy of the cell, but, fundamentally, there always remains an apparatus of emission. Let us return to the Columbine: we have said that one way of transformation, and it is the most common one, would lead to a belief that the nectar-bearing sac may be in some instances the representative of a loculus of the anther. From 10 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries a slight examination we should in fact conclude so. As a proof of this, see the states delineated figures 3, 4, 5 and 6. We otten see a stamen, with a filament dilated at its base, take two horns above (¢ d@), whilst one loculus of the anther, inflated, no longer yields pollen; and the other, being atro- phized to such a degree as no longer to appear except as a yellow gland (4), seems to have produced a rounded sac (e). This sac, the commencement of the cornet, should we not suppose it to be a modified anther-cell? and yet we have just seen that the tendency of the cells is to produce the lobes of the limb of the cornet, and not its tube. There is a mistake, indeed, as to the true signification of this en- largement, which is nothing but the middle of the connective itself. ‘The connective extends itself outwards, and its hy- pertrophy brings with it the atrophy of the cells or of one cell of the anther; it signifies little whence substance comes to it, so that it only come. This is why the production of the spur does not always cause the whole anther to be meta- morphosed all at once. ‘The better-formed cornets, and which even possess all the essential parts,—expanded limb, apex with two lobes and a slit, dilated faux, lengthened tube and terminal gland; these cornets, I say, sometimes still exhibit a trace of their old and primi- tive nature in the anther-cell, hardly visible, but distinguished by its yellow colour, whilst all the rest is white and blue, and, above all, distinguished by the grains of pollen that it still encloses in its bosom (fig. 4). The conditions (figs. 5 and 6) are tendencies towards a re- eularized form of well-constituted nectaries. The condition (fig. 6) is that found in the common Aquilegie. Nothing here would lead to the supposition of an antherine nature, had not this strange metamorphosis been followed step by step. It is evident, that all these cornets being hollow, and de- veloped one above the other in several spirals (fig. 16), all like- wise enter one into another (fig.8), but it is inexact to say that then the glands no longer secrete. This is a mistake : the secretion continues, and, indeed, the tubes never com- pletely close those into which they have entered. Let us now examine in what manner the cornets are gene- rated in a flower of Aquilegia taken at its first periods of de- velopment. 2. Organogeny of the spur-shaped nectaries. To ascertain this organogeny, we have followed the method employed by Schleiden and Vogel. Taking a very young bud, which had hardly attained the length of a millimeter and of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 11 a half (fig. 10), we took off its calyx in water and with very fine needles. ‘The central part then showed itself as a little spher eS whereon the stamina, having just quitted their form of green foliary gibbosities, now assumed that of two parallel protu- berances (figs. 11 and 12). Upon these the connective is pro- portionally more developed than at a later period (fig. 12) ; the filament is dilated and very small; the anther is pro- portionally much larger, but it is still discoid, so that it is easier to discover in it the form of the blade of a leaf. We were very curious to ascertain what the petals then were. The specimen which we dissected was one which would have had two rows of cornets. Now one of these rows (the exte- rior one) was formed by small circular laminze, barely provided with a support, but these laminz exhibited the same consti- tution as the anthers of the stamens described above (fig. 14) : in fact, two gibbosities, representing the anther-cells (a, c) ; a very broad connective (4); and around all this a disc (d), of which, moreover, the trace also exists on the anther of a sta- men proceeding in its development as such. Here it is impossible to mistake the primitive staminal na- ture of the organ which at a later period is to become a hood- shaped petal, that is to say, a cornet-shaped nectary. It is evident that, after the first condition of the flower,—that in which all the parts were still cellular tubercles, similar to the primitive condition of a leaf,—the nectarial petal, before be- coming such, was similar to a stamen. This is what caused us to say above, that the spur-shaped nectaries of the Columbine did not produce stamens by ascending metamorphosis, but that they were, on the contrary, stamens modified by a descending metamorphosis. In short, before being petals, they are rather stamens, or at least anthers, than anything else. The row of small scales, which also become hood-shaped petals, but placed higher, exhibits at this age of the flower a more complete disappearance of the anther-like form. The anther betrays itself there only by the dilatation of the blade and its attenuated border (fig. 13 4), but there is but one com- mon gibbosity in the place of the two parts which represented the loculi. We tookabud three millimeters long (fig. 15), and stripped it of its calycinal envelopes. The stamens in this were better constituted, the filaments lengthened, the connective propor- tionally more contracted, and the loculi very distinct (fig. 17). The petaloid blades, on the contrary, were very broad, hardly pedicelled ; but in the middle there is still the trace of the con- nective (J, fig. 19), and on the sides two protuberances, not so large, but prominent enough to discover in them the anther- 12 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries cells (fig. 19, @) ; traces or waves which incline us to suppose that there is a lateral extension of these cells to produce the petaloid lamina (fig. 19, c). It is evident that this is the anther flattening and dilating itself in order to become the petaloid lamina; and hardly does a bud attain the length of five millimeters before the laminz are hollowed into tubes ; and the spur-shaped nectaries, already making a projection outwards between the sepals of the calyx, are all formed (figs. 20 and 21). . This examination proves that, in the genesis of the spur- shaped nectaries, Nature first forms a leaf, then a stamen, and that she converts the anther of this into a petal, at first flat and then hood-shaped. The nectary is then always a derivation from the stamen —a descending metamorphosis of the stamen. This is precisely one of the facts which we have stated above. If it be to the detriment of the anthers that these singular spurs are produced in the Columbine, it was also a matter of interest for us to inquire if the laminz noticed by DeCandolle between the carpels and the stamens are in reality abortive stamens. It is known that this author was in doubt concerning the nature of these organs. “ One might say,” he writes, in his ‘ Organography *,’ “ that they are either abor- tive stamens or interior petals.” The latter opinion would be contrary to all the laws of Morphology previously established, for the corolline apparatus is exterior to the andreeceum. However, to ascertain the true nature of these lamelle, we have had recourse to an organogenic examination. In a bud three millimeters long, we found these lamellze composed (fig. 18) of a distinct base and summit. The sum- mit is formed of two lateral swellings (a 4, fig. 18), between which is a projecting lamella (ce, fig. 18). The base is lamelloid and winged, with a nervure in the middle (d, fig. 18). There is here evidently a staminal structure: the swellings are the loculi of the anther, the projecting lamella the connective, and the lamelloid base the filament. Now, in a well-developed flower, nothing remains of this summit, which becomes a true continuation of the lamella of the base. Thus the filament suffers hypertrophy, especially in breadth, and the anther, on the contrary, suffers atrophy. The base carries away the summit; the one pole as it dilates diminishes the other. The /amelle of the Columbine are then really stamens mo- dified by the annihilation of the pollen-bearing apparatus, and by the super-development of the filament. * Vol. i. p. 484: of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 13 It now became interesting, after these researches, to study what takes place in the tissues when the anther becomes a nectary. Our observations upon this we comprise in the fol- lowing third chapter. 3. Histology of the nectary. The anther is, as appears from the observations of Purkinje, Mirbel, &c., an apparatus characterized by a peculiar form of tissue. The endotheca, formed by fibro-cellular cells (inen- chyme), hence affords a valuable means of distinguishing the part which the tissulary elements perform in metamorphoses. We were, for our part, greatly desirous of ascertaining this, after observation had convinced us that one stamen will change its nature and become a petal, and notwithstanding, will show in its interior tissue its first destination; whilst another stamen will modify its tissues along with its exterior form. We shall instance here, for the first of these cases, what we have seen in the Reseda odorata, mediterranea, lu- tea, luteola, &c. Our readers no doubt remember the inter- esting discussion on the nature of this flower between Dr. Lindley on one side, Mr. Robert Brown and Mr. Henslow on the other. Now in these flowers it is evident that the white filaments, which we have discovered to be the only organs of odour in this fragrant flower, are but modified stamens*. In- deed, we find in their interior, and especially at the upper end, an inenchymatous tissue, formed of fibre-bearing cells similar to those of the endotheca of an anther of the same plant,—in- deed, identical with them. Now we do not think that a petal, properly so called, contains a similar tissue, excepting in some genera of Orchidee, as the Catasetum. The staminal nature becomes quite evident by means of this entirely endothecal anatomy. In other plants, as for example in the Peonia offi- cinalis, where the stamen becomes a petal, nothing similar takes place. The tissue of the modified part is decidedly either altogether staminal (inenchymatous), or altogether corolline (cellular). Purkinje had already made known the form of the inenchy- matous cells of the endotheca of the Aqguilegia Gleberit. The fibres are radiated, oblique, and unite at the centre in a plate. The endothecal cells of the Aquilegia vulgaris (Plate XI. fig. 22) * There is often a monstrosity in the Reseda which causes atrophy in the white filaments or the fringes of the petals. Then the flower is without any scent. No sooner are these fringes developed than the perfume be- gins to be perceptible. White colour in plants is often the indication of an agreeable scent. Here it is the stamens that grow white, in order to send forth a perfume. + De Cellulis Antherarum fibrosis, p. 55. tab. xv. fig. 15. 14 M. Morven on the Spur-shaped Nectaries are the same. They are stars, with diverging rays, to the number of eight or ten, which, seen from above, resemble the actinenchyme of Hayne. The junction of the radiating fibres takes place on a large plate (fig. 22, 4). What becomes of this inenchymatous tissue in the meta- morphosis of the anther into a spur? Does it continue with its form, as in the Reseda, or does it disappear, as in the Pe- onia? With respect to this, observation shows, that the fibri- ferous cells lose their fibres at the same time that they change their form: from having been spheerenchyme this tissue be- comes pinenchyme (fig. 22, A and B); and whilst the cell, from being spherical as it had been, becomes tubuliform, the fibre is resolved and disappears ; its colour changes from yel- low to blue, and instead of a star, only a blue liquid is seen there, without granules. I did not observe that the cytoblast, although my attention was especially fixed upon it, acted the least part in this histological metamorphosis. When the spur is formed, the nectar-bearing gland appears like a mass of rounded cells (fig. 23 6), smaller and rounder than those of the derm (fig. 23 a). The vascular system of the connective, on the contrary, per- forms an important part in this succession of changes of form, structure and function. Restricted at first, constituted by few fibres, in which we see fine trachee. hard to be unrolled, and pleurenchyme, this system soon divaricates its anasto- moses, and fibres may be perceived in various directions, which, united, form an apparatus much larger than the primitive state. It is evident from these researches, that the metamorphosis of the anther into a spur, that the change of the pollen-bearing apparatus into the nectar-bearing apparatus, attack the deep- est tissues, and that if a morphological metamorphosis takes place, an histological metamorphosis takes place also. If the functions change, there is, as we see, a phenomenal transla- tion of this change by that which exists most intimately in the organization—the tissular constitution. Cases of meta- morphosis, indeed, only become interesting to the physiolo- gist, when he comes to know what at the same time is pass- ing in the tissues. We may therefore say here, that if, in the Columbine, the connective forms the nectar-bearing spur, this change leads to the metamorphosis of the inenchyme of the anther-cells into parenchyme, and that the metamorphosis at- tacks in as great a degree the entire organism as the tissues which compose it. We have now to add a few words relative to the varieties of Aquilegie called stellated. DeCandolle attributes the peta- of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 15 loid form of the petals of these varieties to their being formed only by the filaments of modified stamens in which the an- thers are abortive. This would be an hypertrophy of the sta- minal filaments. We would not venture to say that this is exact: on the contrary, we think that the petaloid and not cuculliform laminz of the ste//ated Columbines are also in reality only modified connectives, and we rest this opinion on the fact that the genesis of these laminz presents in the young flowers the same primary forms as the cornets: these are at first stamens without filaments, but with enlarged anthers. This point alone is decisive; but upon the Aqgui- legia atrata we have often found flowers where the laminz form their spur by slow degrees. This spur, at first a cavity, afterwards a canal, then a tube, then at last a cornet, ori- ginates at the base of the laminz, so that the greater part of these represent the two lobes of the cornets of the Aquilegia vulgaris calcarata, which lobes we have shown to be nothing but the extensions of the two anther-cells. We think, there- fore, that it is to the anther also that the petaloid lamina is owing. Ona flower of the Aquilegia atrata we have seen a well-formed lamina without a trace of spur ; the following one had a simple protuberance, the third a tube, the fourth a half- spur, and the fifth an entire spur. Ail this was the result of a simple elongation of the base of the lamina: now, if this were not an anther in its nature, it would be difficult to ad- mit that the filament could produce the same organs as the anther, and the more so as the facts previously established prove that the gland represents, as to function, the pollen- bearing loculus, and the nectar the pollen, whilst the cornet is really the connective. The filament, when it suffers hyper- trophy, as is the case in the white lamelle near the carpels, gives birth to no product ; whilst, on the contrary, the peta- loid laminz produce a nectary, and subsequently nectar. Or- ganogeny, morphology, and the metamorphoses, unite then in leading us to think, that in the stellated Columbine the spurless petals are modified anthers and not filaments, and capable, as such, of elongating themselves directly into spur-shaped nec- taries under many circumstances. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XI. Fig. 1—8. Metamorphoses of the stamen into a spur-shaped nectary. Fig. 8 only is of the natural size; the others are magnified three times in diameter. Fig. 2. Stamen at its first period of metamorphosis. a. Lengthened connective. ce. Anther-cells. b. Bifid point of the connective. d. Filament. 16 M. Morren on the Nectaries of Aquilegia. Fig. 3. Stamen still more metamorphosed. a. A very distinct anther-cell. b. Rudiment of the second. d. Lamina of the connective. ce. Connective. e. Sac or beginning of the spur. Fig. 4. Stamen almost entirely modified. a. Loculus of the anther. c. Its belly. b.. Spur-shaped sac. d. Nectarial gland. e. Lobe, and f. the other lobe of the limb. Figs. 5. and 6. Ulterior modifications of the stamen, where the nature of the spur is well determined. Fig. 6. bis. Spur-shaped nectary, where the staminal nature has left all its traces. . and b. Loculi of the anther. Intermediary part of the connective between the two loculi. . Lobe of the limb of the nectary. Marginal extension of the anther-cell. Fissure of the limb. g. Another lobe of the limb. ) Filament or support of the nectary. Spur. k. Nectarial gland. Fig. 7. Stamen where the connectival elongation is the most evident. Fig. 8. Insertion one within another of the spur-shaped nectaries. SesHKo ao 8 Fig. 9. One of the lamelle situated between the stamens and the carpels of the common Columbine. Fig. 10. Bud of the natural size, in which the formation of the stamens was observed. Fig. 11. Androeceum of this bud, considerably magnified. a. and b. Very young stamens ; their anther alone is visible. Fig. 12. Stamen of this androeceum separated, greatly magnified. Figs. 13. and 14. Young petals of this bud (fig. 10). a. Dise. b. Margin. c. Prominence indicating the anther-cells. Fig. 15. A rather larger bud. Fig. 16. Androeceum and flower of this bud deprived of its calyx. a, b, c. Petaloid lamine. d. Stamens. Fig. 17. One of these stamens considerably magnified. Fig. 18. One of the laminz situated between the stamens and the carpels. a, b. Traces of the anther-cells. c. Connective. d. Filament. Fig. 19. Young petals of this bud (fig. 15). a. Traces of the anther-cells. b. Connective. ce. Lamellary margin magnified. Fig. 20. A much larger bud of the natural size. Fig. 21. The same stript of its calyx, considerably magnified. a. Nectaries. b. Their fitting into each other. c. Stamens. Fig. 22. Portion of the anther-cell dissected for the purpose of seeing its tissues. A. Endotheca. Bb. Exotheca. a. Endothecal cell. b. Its fibre. Fig. 23. Tissues of the nectarial gland. a. Exterior cellular tissue. b. Interior cellular tissue. Mr. Stephens on Fungi of the neiyhbourhood of Bristol. 17 {I.—On the Fungi of the Neighbourhood of Bristol. By Mr. H. O. SreruHens. To the Editors of the Magazine and Annals of Natural History. GENTLEMEN, Since the publication of my paper on the Mycology of the neighbourhood of Bristol in the Number of the Annals of Natural History for December, 1839, vol. iv. p. 246, I have gathered the following species, a few of which have not been, I believe, as yet mentioned as British: Agaricus Clypeolarius, Bull. Flax; Bourton Coomb, Somerset. Ag. olivaceo-albus, Fries. Leigh Wood. Ag. pachyphyllus, Berk. Under oak trees, Leigh Wood. Ag. imbricatus, Fries. Fir plantations, Bourton Coomb. Ag. blandus, Berk. About way-sides, and in ditches among leaves, Stapleton, &c.; not an uncommon species. Ag. inamenus, Fries. Bourton Coomb. Ag. murinaceus, Bull. Leigh Wood. Ag. butyracets, Bull. Bourton Coomb. Ag. confluens, Pers. Woods, common. Ag. undatus, Berk., Ag. insititius, Fries, Epicrisis Syst. Mycolog. vol. 1. p. 386, No. 48. Leigh Wood, on the ground in mossy places. Ag. ulmarius, Bull. Rather general on elms in the autumn of 1840. Brunswick Square, Bristol. Redland. Ag. palmatus, Bull. On a decaying tree, Leigh Wood, growing in great numbers, tiled one above another, on the upper branches of the tree. Agreeing with Withering’s description of Agaricus fe- tidus. Ag. validus, Berk. Stapleton Wood. Ag. cinnamomeus, Linn. Leigh Wood, not abundant. Ag. cinnamomeus, Bolton, tab. 22. This Agaric, though known te Purton and Withering, seems to be quite a puzzle to our best mo- dern mycologists. Greville and Berkeley consider it to be a state of Ag. fastibilis. Having found a few plants under oak trees in Leigh Wood this autumn, I am enabled to say positively it is not a state of the last-mentioned plant. I do not draw up a character at present, because the plants were old. Bolton says it abounds about Halifax, but I suppose it must be a local spe- cies, or it would be better discriminated. It must bear the name of Ag. pseudo-cinnamomeus, given by Nees ab Esenbeck in his Commentary on Bolton’s Fungusses appended to Willdenow’s translation of that work. Ag. bombycinus, Scheff. On an old hawthorn tree, Ashley. Aq. stipatus, Pers. Ditches, Stapleton, Leigh Wood, not uncommon. Ag. Candollianus, Fries. In dense clusters where trees had been felled, Stapleton. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. C 18 Mr. Stephens on Fungi of the neighbourhood of Bristol. Ag. papilionaceus, Bull. On dung, Stapleton, &c., not uncommon. Ag. Boltoni. On cow-dung, Stapleton Wood. Ag. radicatus, Bolt. On flower-pots in green-houses. Polyporus armeniacus, Scheff. On decaying branches, Leigh Wood. Boletus viscidus, Linn. Pileus pulvinate, scrobiculate, dirty yellow- ish white, copiously covered with slime. Stem scrobiculate below the ring, above the ring reticulated, the reticulations formed by imperfect tubes covered with slime, and of the same colour as the pileus. Flesh dingy white, with a tinge of dirty yellow; when bruised turning verdigris-green, hence B. erugi- nascens, Secretan fide Fries. Pores large, adnate, angular, compound, clay-coloured. The veil is permanent, as in Boletus Grevillei ; but a portion frequently remains round the edge of the pileus, forming a shiny web as in the division Limaceum of Agarics. A species not before detected in Britain. Hydnum membranaceum, Bull. On sticks, Leigh Wood. Hyd. fim- briatum, Pers. Ditto. Hydnum fusco-atrum, Fries, Epicris. Syst. Mycolog. vol. i. p. 515, No. 66. On decaying wood, Leigh Wood. Clavaria fusiformis, Sow. Leigh Wood, &c. Not very rare. Leotia lubrica, Scop. Stapleton Grove. Abundant last autumn. Peziza granulosa, Schum. Pers. Mycolog. Europ. vol. i. p. 225, No. 14. On the naked earth in a beech wood, Stapleton, sum- mer. Not before detected in England. Pez. echinophila, Bull. Pers. Synop. p. 661, No.97. On decaying pericarps of the Castanea vesca. Cunnegar, near Dunster, So- merset. I have likewise received it from Mr. Berkeley. Pez. claro-flava, Grev. Ona stick, Stapleton Wood. Pez. furfuracea, Roth. On hazel stumps, Leigh Wood. Phallus caninus, Hudson. My plants were not inodorous, as stated by Withering, but detestably foetid. The uteri are frequently found empty. Leigh Wood. Nidularia crucibulum and striata. Leigh Wood. Spheria lateritia, Fries. On the gills of Ag. Necator, Leigh Wood, this autumn. At first glueing the gills of the Agaric together with a white substance, in which state it is with difficulty dis- criminated. The contents cf the perithecia, which are white, ooze out as in its congener Sph. aurantia, giving the plant the frosted appearance mentioned by Fries. The juiciness and de- composition of the parent plant depends upon the original na- ture of the matrix, for in my specimens the Agaric is dry and shrivelled. Sph. fibrosa. On blackthorn, common. Sph. Trifolii, Pers. Ditto. Sph. aquila, Fries. On rotten sticks, Stapleton. Sph. ovina, Pers. On decaying stumps, Leigh Wood. Sph. pulveracea, Ehr. On dry wood, Leigh Wood. Doubtful. Sph. vagans, var. Rumicis. Everywhere. Sph. (Depazea) Antir- rhini. Kingsdown. Phoma circinans, Berk. Species nova, on Yucca gloriosa. Abun- dant in gardens. This plant was determined by Mr. Berkeley, Dr. Grundlach on Bats from Cuba. 19 to whom I sent it with an erroneous name. An analogous spe- cies occurred on Dracena fragrans. Phacidium Patelle, Tode. On stems of Conium maculatum. Unex- panded. Cenococcum geophilum, Fr. Underground, amongst the roots of Bryum hornum, Stapleton. I have received it from Mr. Berke- ley. Stilbum tomentosum, Schrad. On Trichia clavata, Leigh Wood. Puccinia Glechomatis, DeCand. On ground-ivy, Durdham Down. Puc. variabilis, Grev. On Leontodon Tararacum, Minehead. Puc. Lychnidearum, Link. On Lychnis diurna, Stapleton. Uredo caricina, Schleich. Epidermis ruptured on Luzula sylva- tica, Stapleton. Uredo Caryophyllacearum, Johnst. On Stel- laria graminea, Minehead, accompanied by a dark brown Puc- cinia, Omitted.—Thelephora arida, Fries. On the bark of oak trees, Leigh Wood ; it is not confined to the bark, but spreads over the interior of hollow trunks in wide patches. Since my first catalogue was published, I have been indebted te the politeness of Mr. J. E. Gray, of the British Museum, for the use of the System of Fries, and Sowerby’s Figures, and to Mr. Berkeley for some corrections. I therefore take this opportunity to rectify some errors in the former Catalogue :—Cantharellus confluens is a small, densely crowded variety of Canth. sinuosus, Fries, Helvella flo- riformis, Sowerby. Thelephora amorpha is doubtful. Spheria in- cana, mihi, is Sph. coprophila, Fries, Syst. Mycolog. vol. ii. p. 340, No. 37. It had not previously been detected in England, and there- fore was not described by any British author. Henry Oxiey STepHens. Terrell Street, Bristol, Oct. 15, 1841. I11.—Description of Four Bats taken in Cuba. By Dr. GRuNDLACH*, Vespertitio barbatus, Grundlach. Pale, chestnut-brown, tips of hair on the upper side darker. Near the muzzle provided with very short hairs, and defined by a curve of longer hairs extending from one angle of the mouth to the other, and which at the mouth angle form a kind of beard. Between the nose and this curve of hairs there is still a smaller interrupted one on the nasal bridge. Ears somewhat prolonged to an obtuse point. Tragus at the base narrow, then expanding, its inner angle curving in a point. Entire length 2" 3". Length from the tip of the nose to the com- mencement of the tail 13’, consequently, length of tail 1. Spur 2/", Breadth 6". ‘Thumbs 1’ long. Found in buildings of the Cafetal St. Antonio el Fundador. * Communicated and translated by Mr. W. Francis, A.L.S., from Wieg- mann’s Archiv. 1810. Part IV. C2 20 Dr. Grundlach on Bats from Cuba. Nos. 2 and 3 form a new genus*, which I propose to call Losostoma. Lobed-mouthed. 'The characters are: Above and below 4 incisors, the upper ones are of unequal size; viz. in the centre are two large double, and at the sides a small simple tooth ; and molars not yet examined, as I did not wish to destroy the only specimen I have as yet taken. Upper margin of the muzzle very prominent, and forms, with two membranaceous folds at the side of the nose, a surface directed obliquely downwards, in which the nostrils are likewise situated. Inferior lip, besides the true lip, has two membranaceous folds one behind the other: the anterior one furnished with warts, and the posterior one consisting partly of one piece, partly divided in the middle. Ears separated. Tail for the greatest part hidden in the interfemoral membrane, the apex free be- yond the produced membrane. LospostomMa cinnumomeum, Grundlach. Above dark, beneath a light cinnamon-brown. The base of the hairs everywhere fainter. Face with blacker hairs. Ears short, wide, rounded, at the inferior margin fringed with hairs, which are likewise perceptible on the folds in the ears. Tragus short, on the inner side with an incisure. Nasal ridge bald. Upper lip furnished towards the angles of the mouth with longer cinnamon-brown hairs, with silky lustre. Ante- rior lip-leaf somewhat elongate, 4-angular, posteriorly bipartite, each part with an indentation in the centre. The nose, leaves of the lower lip, margins of the ear and wings, are blackish brown. ‘The hairs form a cavity above the nose and beneath the chin. Length of the entire body 3" 5". Length of body from the point of the nose to the commencement of the tail 110’. The tail is, down to where it becomes free, 104", the free portion is 2! in length. The interfemoral membrane extends from where it becomes free 84!" further. Spur 82’ long. Breadth 104". The only specimen was taken flying about in the evening in the room of the Cafetal St. Antonio el Fundador. Lozostoma quadridens, Grundlach. Colour of fur pale brown- ish gray, the tips of the hairs on the upper side darker. About the throat the colour passes more into yellow. Ear-aperture wide. Upper margin much elongated to an obtuse point. Above, at the posterior margin, it is somewhat waved. The lower half of the front margin is expanded ; the expansion itself forms four little teeth. The front lip-leaf extends to the angle of the mouth, the hind one is un- divided and but little shorter than the front one, on which its margin rests. The warts of the front one are only present in the centre. The membranaceous folds on the sides of the nose projecting at their upper margin to a point. Nose above naked. Wings, nose, lip-leaves and margins of ears blackish brown. Length of the entire body 1" 63", of the tail in the membrane * The genus appears to be the same with Gray’s Chilonycteris (Ann. Nat. Hist. iv. p.4); but the species are undescribed, and differ from Chi. Mac Leayii, Gr., which was likewise found in Cuba.—Wiegmann. Sir W. Jardine on the Habits of Lepidosiren annectens. 21 62", without it 34", of the interfemoral membrane from the be- coming free of the tail 7'”. Of the spur 74'". Expanse of wings 83", Hab. same as the former. 4. Ruinoroma Carolinense, Geoffr. As, from want of a good description, I am not certain with regard to the determination, I will communicate the description of the animal in my possession. Fur brownish gray. Above darker than beneath. Base of the hairs whitish. Ears wide, naked, only haired outwardly at the cohesion, and inwardly in front where the concavity commences. 6—7 warts on the front margin of the ear. Furnished with longer bristle-hairs on the nasal bridge, at the toes of the hind feet, and at the anus and sexual orifice. Lip large, projecting far beyond the inferior lip. Wings blackish brown. ‘The membrane between the anterior and posterior legs is, in the vicinity of the body, beset with small tufts of hairs. The margin of the interfemoral membrane has, in the neigh- bourhood of the tail, two tooth-like projections, of which the exte- rior one originates from the end of the spur. Tragus 4-angular, at its inner margin somewhat sloped. Length of the entire animal 4", of the body from the tip of the nose to the commencement of the tail 1” 11", of the tail 2" 1"". Usually the tail is inclosed 8’, and free 5”. Spur 9" long. Breadth 92". Hab. During daytime, beneath the roofs at Fundador. 1V.—Hore Zoologice. By Sir W. Jarvine, Bart., F.R.S.E. & F.L.S., &c. No. IV. Remarks on the Structure and Habits of Lepidosiren annectens. As stated at the commencement of these ‘ Hore,’ and im- plied by our motto*, we consider them intended to convey whatever information, whether partial or complete, may come in our way, and tend to illustrate zoology. The appearance of Professor Owen’s important and carefully wrought paper upon Lepidosiren annectens, printed in the last volume of the Transactions of the Linnzan Society+, had been some time looked for, and the interest which its perusal excited was still further heightened by the loan of the other specimens of the remarkable animal which Mr. Weir discovered on the Gambia, and which have been kindly trusted for some time in our pos- session by the sister of that gentleman, now residing in Edin- burgh. Upon examination of these specimens, some of the external parts appeared to vary from the figure and descrip- tion given by Mr. Owen; and as every observation relating to the structure of an animal so curious must draw out some in- ference associating with those around it, we shall describe them minutely. But for the sake of those who may not have access to the valuable Transactions alluded to, which, through the various changes incident to scientific societies, especially * See Annals, vol. iv. p. 160. + Vol. xviii. part 3. p. 327. 22 Sir W. Jardine on the Habits of Lepidosiren annectens. to such as are now becoming venerable from long duration, have maintained their standard excellence both im illustra- tions and in the high character of communications, and also for the sake of our correspondents in distant countries, it may be right, first, shortly to run over the history of this singular genus, and the results at which Mr. Owen has arrived in his recent examinations. The genus Lepidosiren was formed by Professor Natterer, from an animal discovered in the rivers, or rather in the swamps of South America. Two specimens only were ob- tained ; the one was found in a swamp on the left bank of the river Amazon, the other was taken in a pond near Borba, on the river Madeira, and they were described in the ‘ Annals of the Museum of Vienna,’ under the generic title above named. In 1837, specimens of a remarkable animal were brought from another continent, the vicinity of the river Gambia, in West- ern Africa, by Thomas C. B. Weir, Esq.; and one of them being presented to the Royal College of Surgeons in London, has served Mr. Owen for the account which has Just now been published*. In its skeleton the Gambia species is partly osseous, partly cartilaginous; the bodies of the vertebrae, for instance, are not ossified. The articular surface of the lower jaw pre- sents amore complicated structure than is usually observed in Fishes and Reptiles. The ribs are thirty-six pairs, all simple, slightly curved slender styles. The tentacles or rudimentary fins are many-jointed ; the colour of the bones is green, and altogether it offers a most singular and interesting combina- tion of the cartilaginous and osseous types. The muscles of the trunk present all the simplicity and uniformity charac- teristic of the class of Fishes. There are no pancreatic ceca. The intestine is traversed throughout by a spiral valve. The branchiz resemble in form those of the Siren, consisting of separate elongated filaments, attached only by one extremity to the branchial arch; but these extremities are fixed directly to the branchial arch, and not to a common pedicle extended therefrom, as in the Siren. Viewed with a moderate lens, the tripinnatifid structure is beautifully seen in each branchial filament. Thus, although these organs correspond in all es- sential points with those of the true Fishes, yet the gills ap- proximate, in their filamentary form, to those of the Perenni- branchiate Reptiles. The female organs of generation present * When making out the elaborate Catalogue for the learned body to which he belongs, the generic name of Protopterus suggested itself, but the perusal of Dr, Natterer’s paper led him to believe that it was generically identical, Sir W. Jardine on the Habits of Lepidosiren annectens. 23 a grade as high as that which characterizes the Plagiostomous Fishes ; while the elongated form of the ovaria and the con- voluted disposition of the oviduct resemble more the same parts in the Avolotl, Amphiuma and Siren. In all its organs, with a single exception, it is considered as almost intermediate in structure ; that exception exists in the organ of smell, a character “ which is absolute in refer- ence to the distinction of Fishes from Reptiles. In every fish it is a shut sac, communicating only with the external surface ; in every reptile it is a canal, with both an external and in- ternal opening.” Further, Mr. Owen considers the Lepidosiren as typical of a new family, and forming a link to connect the higher Car- tilaginous Fishes with the Sauroid genera Polypterus and Le- pidosteus ; at the same time, it makes the nearest approach in the class, to the Perennibranchiate Reptiles. The specimen which we have examined was in total length 81 inches, and the body was more thickly and decidedly spotted than that represented in the Linnzan Transactions. The spots extend as far forward as the origin of the upper fin, but are continued still further in indistinct cloudings; they take the form of irregular blotches, and are largest, most distinct, and in greatest numbers near the caudal extremity ; this may be a variation incident to the animal, in the same way that the spottings on various other fishes seldom agree. The caudal fin or membrane arises gradually from the body, and the scaling is continued apparently as far as the rays reach ; above this it becomes like a thin membrane, delicate and trans- parent, and terminates in a minute and fine point. The whole appearance in fact of this part is more like that of the mem- brane which is produced at certain seasons upon some species of Triton. The extremities, or fins if they may be so termed, present some differences when compared with Professor Owen’s figure and description. They are each regularly barred with brown, or probably, in a living state, with dark olive. In the descrip- tion alluded to, “ the pectoral tentacles” are said to be “ some- what shorter and more slender than the ventral ones; the former are two inches, the latter two inches four lines in length*.” In our specimen it is just the reverse: the princi- pal ray of the pectoral tentacle is attenuated to a thread-like point, and is 2 inches long; the posterior is only 14ths inch in length. They also present another discrepancy : the principal pectoral tentacle is accompanied above by two short and still more rudimentary members, which do not seem to have been * P. 320. 24 Sir W. Jardine on the Habits of Lepidosiren annectens. present in Mr. Owen’s specimen. They are of equal length, about 3ths of an inch, and are barred as in the other ; but not being permitted to make any dissection, it has been impossible to determine whether they were also supported by cartilagi- nous rays; it is probable that they may not, or that they are very slight, but their presence seems important, as presenting a passage even more modified from the true fin composed of several rays, to the state of a single tentacle destitute of any palmation or approach to the structure of a more perfect ex- tremity. The posterior tentacle is single, but is much more strongly formed than the long ray of the anterior ; it presented no other differences except in comparative length. Can the additional pectoral tentacles be a sexual difference ? The pores and ducts upon the head are disposed nearly as we have endeavoured to represent them in the woodcut. They are very large, and supply a large quantity of mucus ne- cessary for, or at least assisting in, the preservation of the ani- mal when it has retired from, or is deprived of, its native ele- ment. Above and in front of the eye they are tortuous and apparently continuous canals, and run backwards to com- mence the lateral line; and there is an angular one above where each nostril is situate, the place of which can easily be detected by looking with a magnifier at the snout, placed be- tween the observer and the light. The progressive motions of this creature we should conceive to be performed entirely by the caudal or posterior half of the body, their direction being regulated by the tentacles. We can fancy them to be very nearly similar to those of the Tritons, Sir W. Jardine on the Habits of Lepidosiren annectens, 25 which advance by a wriggling or sculling motion of the tail, and direct themselves by their small anterior members, which also are used to assist in raising themselves in the water upon any body or plant, and we should scarcely consider these mem- bers at all applied or used as organs of touch. Ifthe structure of this animal is remarkable, so also are some habits in its ceconomical history, but we have to regret that our information on these points is still very imperfect. Miss Weir, in allowing us to examine the specimens of the fish, ac- companied them with the following note, and a piece of the hard clay alluded to in the Transactions of the Linnzan So- ciety *, bearing the impression of the animal as if it had lain for some time imbedded in it, and with the earth in such a state as to allow the form of the cast to be retained: “ Fish taken in the summer of 1835, on the shore of Macarthy’s Island, about 350 miles up the river Gambia. They were found about eighteen inches below the surface of the ground, which, during nine months of the year, is perfectly dry and hard, the remaining three months it is under water. When dug out of the ground and put into water, the fish immediately unfold themselves and commence swimming about.” They are dug up with sharp stakes and are used for food ; the accompanying wood- cut represents the manner in which they are folded up at the time they are procured ; it is drawn of the natural size, from a second specimen preserved i in spirits, which seemed to have been rolled up in dried leaves, or in the leaves which might have accumulated at the bottom of the water of the inundated ground ; several adhered to it, and were kept in their place by means of a large supply of mucus which still invested the specimen, and may serve as a provision to assist In preser- ving life during the torpidity or hybernation of the animal. Note.—Since writing the above observations, we have per- used the important paper by M. Bischoff from the translation published in a late number of the ‘ Annales des Sciences Na- * Note in vol. xviii, part 3. p. 328. 26 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary turelles.’. The South American species which is there treated of seems to be in several points even more nearly allied to the Cartilaginous Fishes than that from Africa, particularly in the structure of its almost cartilaginous skeleton, and in the spiral intestinal valve, which, from additional observations made by MM. Bibron and Milne Edwards, appeared to be still more developed than in the L. annectens. But it has been found to differ from the last, and from Fishes, in an im- portant particular, that of the heart possessing a double auri- cle ; and also in the rays of the tentacles being of one piece, and not jointed. The structure of the nostril we consider as entirely analogous to that of the organ in Fishes: it is nota respiratory organ in L. paradova, the double opening is only similar to the valvular separation of the sac in Fishes, and, from the structure of the muscles, would seem to act some- what similarly, and they will cause the passage to resist or pro- mote the flow of the water through it. The position of the opening to the lungs or air-bladder is also of importance in the consideration of this question, and is in favour of its reptile alliance ; but all the modifications of form must be balanced with each other, and additional dissections are required of L. annectens, which it may even yet be found necessary to sepa- rate and place in Mr. Owen’s proposed genus Protopterus. V.—Commentary on Mr. G. R. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds, 1840. By H. E. Srrickuanp, Esq., M.A., F.G.S., &c. [Continued from vol. vi. p. 423.] P., 26. Tux date of Thunberg’s genus Brachyurus (1743) seems to bea misprint ; but not knowing in what work it is defined, I am un- able to rectify it. Myiophonus ought, I think, to be placed among the Turdine near Petrocossyphus. The Rock Thrushes were first defined by Boié in 1822, under the name of Monticola, and afterwards altered by him in 1826 to Petro- cossyphus. ‘The former name ought therefore to stand, as authors ought no more to alter their own generic names when once pub- lished than those of others. But should there be any insuperable objection to the name Monticola (of which I am not aware), then the name Petrocincla, Vig., 1825, has the next claim. Bonaparte di- vides the Rock Thrushes into two genera, Petrocincla (P. savatilis) and Petrocossyphus (P. cyaneus). There seems not to be sufficient ground for this separation ; but if adopted, a new name should be given to P. cyaneus, because the name Petrocossyphus, Boié, is a mere synonym of Petrocincla, Vig., and should therefore be can- celled. P. 27. Turdus nove-hollandie, Gm., is quoted by Mr. Gray as on Mr, G. R. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds? 27 the type both of Oreocincla and of Aplonis (p. 40). I cannot at the moment ascertain to which of these genera this bird really belongs, having no specimen of it at hand. The genus Cichla, Wagl., belongs to the Troglodytine, near Meru- lavis, and its specific name, atricapilla, Lin., should be used instead of longirostra, Gm. The name Aipunemia, Sw. (airvs and xvijun) should be written AEpycnemia. The genus Malacocercus (not Malacocircus) belongs to the Stur- nine rather than the Crateropodine. The form and colour of the bill and legs show a close affinity to Acridotheres. Is not Timalia Somervillei, Frankl., a synonym of Malacocercus striatus ? P., 28. It is not easy to say where the genus Icterta should be classed, but it is clearly out of place among the Crateropodine, which, when reduced within their natural limits, seem confined exclusively to the old world. Tanagra capensis, Sparm., seems to be a synonym of Corvinella corvina, Shaw (which in that case should be called C. capensis, Sparm.). Itis certainly not a synonym of Keropia crassirostris. Mr. Gray seems to have omitted the genus Stenorhynchus, Gould. (Proc. Zool. Soc. pt. ili. p. 186.) The genus Mimeta, Vig., cannot, I think, be separated from Orio- lus. Several modern authors have reunited the two genera. P. 29. The name Criniger, Tem., 1820, should be used instead of Trichophorus, 'Tem., which is a later alteration. The name Hematornis, Sw., 1831, ought not to supersede the prior name Jzos, Tem. Mr. Swainson, in his ‘ Classif. Birds,’ vol. ii. p. 24, discards the genus Jzos, Tem., because it is artificial, i.e. it contains species not naturally allied. This is a reason why it should be restricted, but not why it should be cancelled; for if this principle were admitted, we must discard nearly every generic name of Lin- neus. If then the name /zos be used for this restricted group, the word Hematornis may be retained for the genus of Falconide so called by Vigors in December 1831 (Spilornis, Gray). After a careful study of the genera Querula and Lipangus, I feel satisfied that this sub-family Queruline should merge into that of Pyroderine, Gray (Coracine, Sw.), and secondly, that the Pyroderine should be placed under the family Ampelide instead of Corvide. Notwithstanding what Mr. Swainson says (Flycatchers, p. 75) as to Coracina (Pyroderus, Grey) being merely the representative among the Crows of Querula among the Flycatchers, yet the proportion of parts and total structure of these two birds are so nearly identical, that it is almost a question whether they should be even generically se- parated. Further, on comparing these birds and Lipangus with the Ampelide, and taking also their geographical range into consideration, it will, I think, be evident to the untheoretical naturalist that the family Ampelide is their proper abode. The rictal bristles at first sight form an objection, but of these we see traces in several genera of the Ampeline. 28 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary It is very doubtful whether Lanius nengeta, Lin., can be quoted as synonymous with Xolmis polyglotta (Spix), mihi. On comparing a specimen of the latter with Brisson’s description of his Cotinga ci- nerea (the foundation of Linneus’s Lanius nengeta), taken from Marc- grave, I find neither the black eye-streak nor the white tail-covers which are mentioned by Brisson. That author, moreover, omits to mention the black streak on each side of the chin, and the white ba- sal spot on the remiges of X. polyglotta. P.30. Knipolegus should be written Cnipolegus (k not being used in Latin). Vieillot’s name climazura being of the same date with Spix’s name mystacea (not mystax), and the former word being dog-Latin, it is better to call the bird Fluvicola mystacea, Spix. The Gubernetes forficatus, Sw., is the Muscicapa yiperu of Lich- tenstein, not his M. vetula, which last bird is the Milvulus longi- pennis, Sw., and Muscicapa pullata, Bon., figured in Spix, vol. ii. pl. 18. The type of Gubernetes should therefore be called G. yiperu (Licht.), unless Vieillot may have given it an earlier name in quoting Azara., The generic name Pitangus, Sw., 1827, should be used instead of Saurophagus, Sw., 1831. Mr. Gray has transposed the specific names attached to the ge- nera Saurophagus and Scaphorhynchus. 'The type of the former ge- nus is the Lanius sulphuratus, Lin., and of the latter, Lanius pitan- gua, Lin., both of which are accurately described and figured by Brisson. Scaphorhynchus pitangua (Lin.) is the Megastoma ruficeps of Swainson, not his M. flaviceps, as is proved by the words aurantia and fulva, applied by Briss. and Lin. to the coronal spot. The name Tyrannus was first used generically by Lacépede in 1799: It does not appear why Mr. Gray has changed to Myiobius the name Tyrannula, defined by Mr. Swainson in 1827, and typified by the Muscicapa barbata, Gm. P.31. Mr. Gray seems to be justified in imposing his name Pa- chyrhamphus on the restricted genus Pachyrhynchus of Spix, the lat- ter name being justly cancelled as a mere synonym of Tityra, Vieill. The genuine Lanius cayanus of Lin. and Briss. is not the Psaris cayanensis of Swainson, but his P. guianensis, distinguished by the naked lores, and by having two-thirds of the beak red. I can find no description of Swainson’s P. cayanensis, but I infer that he means the species with plumed lores, the beak wholly black, and a small ae spot on the chin (Lanius inquisitor, Olfers, and Licht. Verz., p- 50). ra Platysteira write Platystira (the ec in Greek being made ¢ in Latin). P. 32. For Leucocirca write Leucocerca. The genera Culicivora and Setophaga would be more naturally placed among the Sylvicoline, as is done by Mr. Swainson, ‘ Classif, on Mr. G. R. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds, 29 Birds,’ vol. ii. p.58. The length of the legs, the absence of a spu- rious quill, and the geographical range of these genera show that they do not belong to the Muscicapine. The Cryptolopha poiocephala should be called C. ceylonensis, Sw., as it had been known as the Platyrhynchus ceylonensis of Sw. ‘ Zool. Ill.’ nearly twenty years before Mr. Swainson changed its name to poiocephala. I cannot but think it injudicious in Mr. Gray to transpose the names Butalis and Muscicapa, after Boié and Brehm had referred M. grisola to the former and M. atricapilla to the latter genus, an arrangement sanctioned by the high authority of Bonaparte. P. 33. For Leiothrix write Liothriz. The name Pteruthius of Swainson, to be consistent with etymo- logy, should be written Ptererythrius (from repo and épvOpo0s) ; but should it be thought that this is taking too great a liberty with the original name, we may, at least, venture to write it Pterythrius. The name Laniisoma, Sw., 1831, should be used instead of Péi- lochloris, Sw., 1837. Authors should not be encouraged in chan- ging names, even of their own composition. A father may give his son what name he pleases at baptism ; but once given, the law very wisely pronounces that name unalterable. For Phenicircus write Phenicercus. For Pipraeidea write Piproidea. P. 34. Mr. Gray has correctly disentangled a difficulty by re- storing the name Procnias of Hoffmansegg to the Averanos (Chasma- rhynchus, Tem.). The fact is, that Vieillot having in 1816 given the name Tersa to a part of the old genus Procnias, this name ought to be retained for the remainder (the dveranos); whereas Tem- minck in 1820 restricted the name Procnias to Vieillot’s genus, and gave a name of his own to the Averanos. I may remark in passing, that the genus Tersa appears to connect the Ampelide directly with the Tanagride. The name Bombycilla was first used generically by Vieillot, not by Brisson. Ptiliogonys, Sw., should be written Ptilogonys. Cuvier, in his ‘ Rég. An.’ vol.i. p. 363, states that the name Cam- pephaga, Vieill., was subsequent to his name Ceblepyris, but I am not aware in what work the latter name was first published. Indeed, I cannot learn whether Cuvier published any new genera of birds be- tween 1802, when the first volume of his ‘Comparative Anatomy’ came out, and 1817, when the ‘ Régne Animal’ was published. I should be obliged by any information on this point. The groups Campephagine and Dicruriné seem to belong more naturally to the Laniade than to the Ampelide. Lanius ferrugineus, Gm., seems to be incorrectly quoted under Oxynotus ferrugineus, Sw. Latham’s description of L. ferrugineus exactly agrees with a bird in my collection which is clearly a Dryo- scopus, Boié ; and instead of the dorsal feathers being ‘‘ very rigid” as in Oxynotus, they are very soft and downy. 30 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary The permanent specific name of the Malabar Hdolius should be paradiseus, Lin., not malabaricus, Gm. It is the Cuculus paradiseus, Lin., well figured by Brisson, except that one of the fore toes is re- versed in the figure which led to its being considered a Cuculus. Mr. Gray has judiciously restored Irena to its place among the Dicrurine, whereas Mr. Swainson had made it a sub-genus of Oriolus. The earliest specific name of Corvinella is (Tanagra) capensis, Sparm. ‘This bird has also received the names of Lanius cissoides, Vieill., L. flavirostris, Sw., and L. xanthorhynchus of the Munich Museum. Collurio not being defined as a genus by Brisson, and the name moreover having been applied by Vigors to a different genus, it is better to retain the name Hnneoctonus of Boié, who was the first to separate this group generically from the true Shrikes. P. 36. Cyclarhis should be written Cyclorhis (kvxXos and pis). The type of Telophonus should be called T. senegalus (Lin.). It is the Lanius senegalus, Lin., and the L. erythropterus of Shaw, not of Linneus. Nilaus capensis should be called N. brubru, Lath., 1801. Vanga was first used as a Latin generic name by Vieillot, not by Buffon. P. 37. The genus Cracticus, Vieill. (restr.), ought certainly to enter into the sub-family of Gymnorhinine ; for though the hooked beak shows an affinity to the Shrikes, yet the majority of its cha- racters and the geographical range show a strong preponderance in favour of its alliance with Gymnorhina, Gray. Pica colliei, as described by Vigors in the ‘ Zool. Journ.’ vol. iv., can hardly be the same as Cyanurus bullockii. Mr. Vigors’s bird has the throat black instead of white, and its dimensions differ from those given to C. bullockii by Wagler. Mr. Gray must also be wrong in quoting Garrulus uliramarinus, Bon., under Cyanurus bullockii, as Bonaparte, in his Osservazioni sulla 24 ed. Cuv. Reg. An. p. 84, says that it is synonymous with Pica sieberi, Wagl., and Garrulus sordidus, Sw. Is not the name Dysornithia, Sw., prior to Perisoreus, Bon. ? P. 38. For Crypsirina write Crypsirhina.. ‘To the synonyms of C. varians add Colius viridis, Lath. P. 39. Gymnoderus nudus, Gm., is the Gracula fetida, Lin., and the latter specific name therefore has the priority. Is not Buffon’s Pl. Enl. 268. the smaller species of Gracula (Hu- labes indicus, Cuv.), and not the G. religiosa, as Mr. Gray makes it ? I should prefer placing the Graculine among the Sturnide, near Pastor, to which group they seem much allied in structure. The genus Pyrrhocorar was first defined by Vieillot, not by Bris- son. To the synonyms of Corcorar add < Pyrrhocorax, Tem. P.40. Megalopterus, Smith, must be changed, the name being pre-occupied by Boié for a genus of Sternine. If the Acridotheres roseus be generically separated from the rest of on Mr. G. R. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds’ 31 that genus, it should bear the name of Psaroides of Vieillot, who was the first to point out the distinction, and Temminck’s name Pastor should be cancelled, being a mere synonym of Acridotheres. P.41. The genus Creadion surely belongs to the Meliphagide. Is it not identical with Neomorpha, Gould? The name Sturnella ludoviciana, Lin., is preferable to S. magna, Lin., the latter name being comparative, and only correct when the bird was classed as an Alauda. Besides, the name Judoviciana is adopted by Latham, Richardson, Bonaparte, &c. The genera Sturnella and Amblyrhamphus (not Amblyrhynchus), if carefully examined, will be found to belong to the Icterine rather than to the Sturnine. When thus arranged, the whole of the Stur- niné wiil be confined to the old world, and the /cterine to the new, thus adding to the numerous instances in which geographical distri- bution coincides with natural affinities. In the same way I believe it will be found that the characters of Astrapia refer it to the oriental group Lamprotornine, rather than to the American one Quiscaline, in which Mr. Gray places it. Is not Vieillot’s name Quiscalus versicolor, prior to that of Q. pur- pureus, Licht. ? Lesson quotes Corvus mexicanus, Gm. (and not Oriolus, as Mr. Gray has it,) as the type of his genus Cassidiz. The confusion which overhangs several of the black Icterine birds of America is very great, but this is not the place to discuss the en- tire question. I will therefore merely state that, as far as my inves- tigations go, the Cassidix meaxicanus, Less. (which, however, is not the Corvus mexicanus, Gm.) is identical with the Scaphidura barita, Sw. If so, the names Cassidix and Scaphidura being of equal date, we may be allowed to retain the latter, and expunge the mongrel word Cassidix. To the Scaphidura barita, Sw., I also refer Cassicus niger, Vieill., Gal. Ois. 89. (which, however, is not the Oriolus ni- ger, Gm.). Also note that Scaphidura barita, Sw., is neither Gra- cula barita, Lin., nor Gracula barita, Lath., Syn. pl. 18, Gen. Hist. pl. 44. The Corvus mevicanus, Gm., is, I have no doubt, synonymous with Quiscalus macrurus, Sw. (See Fernandez’s description of his Hocitzanatl quoted by Ray and Brisson.) The Oriolus niger of Gmelin, described by Brisson to be under ten inches in length, is a distinct species found in the West Indies, and called Quiscalus ba- ritus by Bonaparte. It is, perhaps, the same as Quiscalus crassi- rostris, Sw. The Gracula barita of Linneus (excluding his quota- tion of Brisson) seems to be known only from his description, and is not the same with Oriolus niger, Gm. The Gracula barita of La- tham, Syn. pl. 18, Gen. Hist. pl. 44, is stated by Bonaparte in his ‘ American Ornithology’ to be identical with Quiscalus versicolor, an opinion in which I concur. Cassicus and Xanthornus were first used as genera, not by Brisson, but by Lacépéde in 1799. P. 42. The genus Euplectes was first defined by Swainson in 1830 (Zool. Ill. ser. 2.), with HE. oriz, Lin., for its type. Is not this prior to the name Pyromelana. Bon. ? 32 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary Should not the name Phileterus socius, Lath., be used instead of P. lepidus, Smith? The restricted genus Ploceus, Cuv., if Lovia philippina, Gm., be considered its type, will contain the greater part of the genus Eu- plectes, Sw. P. 43. The genus Symplectes, Sw., seems to have a fair claim to generic distinctien, a conclusion to which Sir W. Jardine arrived in- dependently of Mr. Swainson, when he gave it the name of Eupodes. Mr. Swainson’s name, however, was published first, and must there- fore be retained. It appears to me that the genera Spermospiza, Pyrenestes, Vidua, Estrelda, Amadina, Spermestes, and Erythrura, ought all to be in- cluded in the sub-family Ploceine. Though the varying development of their beak presents analogies to the Coccothraustine and Fringil- line, yet their true affinity to Ploceine is indicated by their pecu- liarly elevated culmen extending backwards on the forehead, their naked nostrils, their geographical extent, and especially by the spu- riousness of their first primary quill, a character often of great va- lue as an index of affinity. Moreover, the genus Vidua is directly united to Ploceus by means of V. chrysoptera, Vieill., and Ploceus capensis, Lin. The Tanagrine would be better placed at the end of Fringillide, so as not to separate the Coccothraustine from the Fringilline. There is much confusion in the synonyms of Tanagra episcopus, but Mr. Gray is probably right in quoting Pl. Enl. 178. The ori- ginal T. episcopus of Linnzus and Brisson seems to be the 7. seri- coptera of Swainson and the T. celestis of Spix. It is probably also the Gracula glauca of Sparrman, though that bird is said to be seven inches long. The T. episcopus of Swainson’s Birds of Brazil, pl. 39, seems (judging from the figure) to be only the young of his 7. cana, pl. 37. The T. celestis, Sw., Birds Braz. pl. 41, is very different from T. celestis, Spix, as the wing-covers are green. It is possibly the female of 7. cana, Sw. There is no doubt that Tanagrella multicolor, Sw., is the Motacilla velia, Lin., and the latter specific name should therefore be used. P.45. On comparing a specimen of Leucopygia ruficollis with Lesson’s very short description of his Cypsnagra hirundinacea, there can be no doubt of their belonging to the same genus; but as Lesson describes his bird as blue-black above, and says nothing of the white on the rump and wing-covers, I think they cannot be specifically synonymous. I would fain for once break through the law of pri- ority in order to get rid of the intolerable name of Cypsnagra, Less., a word compounded more Gallico out of Cypselus and Tanagra! Is not Emberiza quadricolor, Gm., an earlier synonym of Ery- thrura prasina (Sparm.) ? Mr. Gray seems to have omitted the genus Pytelia, Sw., type, P. elegans, Gm., Vieill. Gal. pl. 64. P. 46. I do not think it advisable to change the name Pyrgita, Cuv., to that of Passer, “ Ray.” Ray does not define Passer as a genus, but merely applies it to designate the House Sparrow in com- on Mr. G. R. Gray’s * Genera of Birds? 33 mon with many other birds to which it has no affinity. The Spar- rows were first defined as a genus by Cuvier, who gave them the name by which the ancient Greeks designated them. To the synonymes of Montifringilla add Chionospiza, Kaup. Ammodramus should be written Ammodromus. P. 47. It does not appear why the name Melophus cristata (Vig.) is changed to M. lathami, Gray. I see no objection to cristata, but if there be any, Sir W. Jardine’s name erythropterus should be adopted. The name Cynchramus was first used generically, I believe, by Bo- naparte. P. 48. Agrodroma rufescens, Tem., should be called A. campestris, Bechst. P.49. The family Musophagide, as here constituted, is a very arti- ficial group. The genus Phytotoma should certainly be placed next to, if not in, the sub-family Tanagrine. Its beak approaches in form near that of Spindalis, Jard., and the dentations of the margin, though very peculiar, have a distant counterpart in the beak of Euphone. Its South American habitat also favours this view of ar- rangement. The Coliine certainly seem to form a caput mortuum, which no analysis has yet been able to bring within the limits cf any other family of Conirostres. ‘They may therefore be raised to the rank of a family with the title of Colude. The sub-family Musophagine ought, I conceive, to be placed in the family Cuculide. It decidedly belongs to the Scansores, for live spe- cimens of Turaco invariably perch with two toes behind the branch. In the structure of their beak and legs they show considerable affinity to the Cuculide, especially to the genera Phenicopheus and Croto- phaga. It will be recollected too that the Cuculide genus Sauro- thera has the bill dentated. Mr. Gray is quite correct in quoting Edwards, pl. 7, under Turaco persa (Lin.). The descriptions of Cuculus persa given by Linneus and Brisson are taken from Edwards, and are based on the very rare species with a green crest margined with red (C. buffoni of Swainson, but not of Vieillot nor of Jardine, which is the purpureus, Less., and senegalensis, Sw.). There is a specimen of the true T. persa in Lord Derby’s collection. The name persa is commonly but erroneously given to the species with a green crest margined with white. This species has never received a distinct appellation, and I therefore re- commend that it be called T. albocristatus. Stephens’s name afri- canus cannot be correctly used for it, for his description is inappli- cable to any known species, and is a mélange of the descriptions of T. albocristatus and T. persa. P.50. According to the Jaws of Latinity, Tockus should be written Toccus, and Ramphastos, Rhamphastos. The genus Scythrops, though it reminds us at first sight of the Rhamphastide, yet is much more nearly allied to the Cuculide, as shown by the position of the nostrils, the red space round the eyes, the form of the wings and feet, and the geographical habitat. Pha- Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. D 34 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary nicopheus forms its nearest affinity, but in the pointed wings and co- lour of the plumage it approaches Cuculus. P.51. The group Psittacara, as defined by Vigors in the Zool. Journ, vol. ii., seems sufficiently distinguishable from Conurus, Kuhl, to be retained as a genus. For Centrourus write Centrurus. Mr. Gray has mistaken the type of this genus as defined by Swainson, which is the Nestor meridio- nalis (Gm.) (N. hypopolius, Wagl., Psittacus australis, Shaw, Mus. Lev. 87); consequently Centrourus, Sw., merges into a syno- nyme of Nestor, Wagl. The Psittacus australis of Latham (P. con- cinnus, Shaw) is hardly to be distinguished generically from Tricho- glossus, but if made distinct, will require a new name. P. 52. The specific name of Psittacodis should be paraguanus, Gm., not parugua, Marcgrave, the latter name being antecedent to the system of binomial nomenclature. For Poiocephalus write Peocephalus, the o. in Greek becoming @ in Latin and e in English. (Hence the term poikilitic, lately intro- duced in Geology, should be written pecilitic, as we write economy and not oikonomy.) Mr. Gray seems to have omitted a genus of Loriine which wants a name. It is the Psittaculus of Swainson, and is typified by P. ver- nalis, galgulus, and rubrifrons. P.53. Mr. Gray very properly restores the name Agapornis, Selby, to its true type, from which Mr. Swainson had removed it and applied it to the American group Psittacula. The name Psittacula sbould be quoted on the authority of Brisson, not of Kuhl. Brisson divides the genus Psiétacus into six subgenera, which, being based on definitions, may be retained on Brisson’s au- thority. These are Ara, Cacatua, Lorius, Psittacus, Psittauca, and Psittacula. ‘The name Psittaca, however, being too near in sound to Psittacus, is not retained. Pl. Enl. 455. f.1, quoted by Mr. Gray under Psiftacula passerina, is the basis of P. capensis, Gm., so named from a mistake in the habitat. ‘This bird is named guianensis by Mr. Swainson, who con- siders it distinct from passerinus, Lin., which he calls cyanopterus. The chief distinction is that the guianensis, Sw. (capensis, Gm.), has the, punp green, while in the passerinus, Lin. (cyanopterus, Sw.), it is blue. The bird figured in Phillips, Voy. Bot. Bay, p. 267, pl. 40, is not the Calyptorhynchus banksii (Lath.), but the C. cookii (Tem.). The name Corydon, Wagl., cannot stand, as it was pre-occupied in 1828 by Lesson (Man. Orn. vol. i. p. 177). A new name will therefore be wanted for Corydon, Wag]. Psittacus nestor was, I believe, never published by Forster under the name of hypopolius, consequently the name meridionalis, Sm., has the priority. The sub-families composing the family Picide, as arranged by Mr. Gray, are not of equivalent value. The Bucconine, Picumnine and Yuncine torm three groups apparently of equal value, and the Wood- peckers form a fourth ; but the Picine, Dryocopine, Celeine and Co- on Mr. G. R. Gray’s * Genera of Birds, 35 laptine are only subdivisions of the group Woodpeckers. These last should therefore bei unted into one sub-family Picine, or, if divided, they should form groups of a lower denomination than a sub-family. P.54. Mr. Gray is quite right in keeping the name Picumnus, Tem., for the American group (Asthenurus, Sw.), because Tem- minck evidently regarded this as the type of his genus, making it the first division, and giving the name abnormis to the Asiatic group (Picumnus, Sw., Microcolaptes, Gray). Mr. Gray quotes Rich. Faun. Bor. Am. pl. 56. for Picoides tri- dactylus (Gm.), but Richardson’s bird is the P. hirsutus (Vieill.), which Bonaparte considers as distinct from the European P. tridac- tylus. feinsedeous should be written Hemicercus. It does not appear why a new name is given to the genus Dendro- copus, proposed by Boié and sanctioned by Bonaparte, the name Den- drocopus, Vieill., being superseded by Dendrocolapies. The name Dendromus is pre-occupied for a genus of Mammalia by Dr. Smith in Zool. Journ. vol. iv. p. 438. Mr. Gray seems to unite the American Dryotomi of Swainson with the European group Dryocopus, Boié (D. martius), and indeed they cap hardly be distinguished in structure, though Bonaparte keeps them separate. P. 55, The name Tiga, Kaup., 1836 (Thierreich, vol. ii. p. 37), must supersede Chrysonotus, Sw., 1837. The species will then stand as Tiga tridactyla (Sw.). After the Green Woodpeckers have been distinguished as Gecinus, Boié, Swainson’s genus Brachylophus still includes two well-marked groups : first, the Short-thumbed Woodpeckers closely allied to Tiga, containing 1. P. aurantius, Lin. (P. bengalensis, Gm.) ; 2. P. goen- sis, Gm.; 3. P. philippinarum, Lath.; 4. P. hematribon, Wagl., and 5. P. erythronotus, Vieill. To this group I would propose the name BracHyprERNus. The remaining group contains the Crimson Woodpeckers, P. miniatus and puniceus. I am not aware whether Boié includes these species in his genus Gecinus ; but if not, they may retain the restricted name Brachylophus, Sw., which in that case, not being precisely equivalent to Gecinus, Boié, would escape obli- teration as a synonyme. It is not easy to decide which of the specific names of Geococcyr bas the priority. Mr. Swainson states (Classif. Birds, vol. ii. pp. 140, 325), that he named it longicauda in the Catalogue of Bullock’s Mexican Museum in 1824. If, however, it was merely named at that time and not described, the name cannot be considered to have ac- quired a right of priority, as the slovenly practice of merely reciting the names of new species without defining their characters (for many examples of which see Lesson’s Traité d’Ornithologie) cannot be too much discouraged, as it only tends to choke up the science with synonymes. It does not appear whether Blainville ever published this species under the name of Saurothera botte, and therefore the name californiana used by Lesson in his Supplement to Buffon some 2 36 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary time previously to 1831, will probably turn out to have the prior claim to all others. P. 56. The Centropus egyptius (Gm.) seems to be the same as C. senegalensis (Lin.), which latter name will therefore prevail. The name Coua, Levaill., was, I believe, never used as a Latin word, and therefore ought not to supersede Serisomus, Sw. The Cuculus guira, Gm., distinguished by having only eight feathers in the tail, ought surely to be generically separated from the « four-winged Cuckoos”’ (Diplopterus, Boié). The former constitutes the group Guwira, Less., 1851, of which Octopteryr, Kaup., 1836, and Ptiloleptus, Sw., 1837, are synonymes. The type will stand as Guira piriragua (Vieill.), Cuculus guira, Gm., Ptiloleptus cristatus, Sw. P. 57. Should not Ptilonopus be written Ptilopus? (from mrihov and zovs). Is Treron, Vieill., prior to Vinago, Cuv.? Cuvier says of the latter name, “ Vieillot has changed it to Treron.” P. 58. Turtur was first used as a generic name by Mr. Selby in 1835. The name of the first genus of Gourine should be altered from Peristera, Sw., to Phaps, Selby, and the second from Leptoptila, Sw., to Peristera, Sw. In 1827 Mr. Swainson defined an American group as Peristera, and in 1835 Mr. Selby defined an Australian group as Phaps. So far all was well; but in 1837 Mr. Swainson thought proper to transfer his name Peristera to the Phaps of Selby, and to give anew name, Leptoptila (misspelt Leptotila), to the genus which he had previously called Peristera. It behoves the advocates of the priority principle to discountenance such wanton changes by bringing back these genera to their original designations. The specific name jamaicensis, Lin., should supersede rufavilla, Wagil. P. 59. I see no reason why the name Geophilus, Selby (restr.)_ should not be retained for the Columba nicobarica, as Dr. Fleming did not include it in his genus Verrulia, and consequently Geophilus is not the precise equivalent of Verrulia. To the synonymes of Gowra, Flem., add Megapelia, Kaup. Chamapetes should be written Chamepetes. If Mitu be retained as a generic name, it should be Latinized into Mitua. Lesson is, I believe, the first author who attached the name of Mitu toa genus, and it should therefore be quoted on his autho- rity, not on Marcgrave’s. P. 60. Syrmaticus reevesi ought to bear the name of S. superbus (Lin.). There can be no doubt that this is the species intended by Linnezus, though his description of his Phastanus superbus, taken from Chinese documents, is by no means accurate. We have the autho- rity of Temminck and Sir W. Jardine for this identification. To the synonymes of Huplocomus add Spicifer, Kaup.,. 1836. The Impeyan Pheasant is the true type of Lophophorus, Tem., 1818, and this name should therefore supersede Monaulus, Vieill. on Mr. G. R. Gray’s * Genera of Birds.’ 37 The Phasianus leucomelas, Lath., if generically distinct, must have a new generic name. It is not correct to quote Lophyrus, Steph., as a synonyme of Lo- phophorus, the word Lophyrus being merely a mistake of the artist who engraved Stephens’s plate 36, vol. xiv. P.61. Francolinus was first defined as a genus by Stephens, TS19. It is to be regretted that the legitimate name Arboricola had not occurred to Mr. Hodgson instead of the hybrid word Arborophila, but it is too late to change it. Coturnix was first used generically by Cuvier about 1802. For Ptilophachus write Ptilopachys. The name Cryptonyx, Tem., 1815, is prior to Liponyxr, Vieill., 1816. P. 62. Brisson does not use Bonasa to designate a genus, and the name Bonasia, Bon., may therefore be retained. P. 63. The Turnicine would range more naturally among the Te- traonide than among the Tinamide. For Rhyncotus read Rhynchotus. P. 64. The family Charadriade ought to be in contact with Sco- lopacide, although most modern authors interpose the Ardeide be- tween them. It is very doubtful whether Gdicnemus magnirostris, Tem., Pl. Col. 387, can be correctly quoted as the type of Burhinus, Il. La- tham described a bird under the name of Charadrius magnirostris, “« the size of the Golden Plover, bill stout and very broad, resembling the Tody genus.” From this description Iliger founded his genus Burhinus. Wager, in his monograph of Charadrius, quotes Latham’s description, and places it among his ‘‘ species 4 me non visz.”’ He also describes as a distinct species the (idicnemus magnirostris, Tem., under the name of Charadrius magnirostris. This bird is de- scribed as from 17 to 20 inches long, with the beak much longer, stronger and more compressed than the other Gidicnemi, and it seems therefore quite distinct from C. magnirostris, Lath. Lesson, however, unites the two in his genus Burhinus, and in order to admit Tem- minck’s bird he greatly modifies the original definition of that genus ; for instead of the ‘‘ Rostrum latum, depressum’’ of Illiger, we find in Lesson ‘‘ bec trés comprimé sur les cétés.”’ It would seem then that the true Burhinus of Illiger, if such a bird really exists, has yet to be discovered, and that a new generic name is wanted for the Gidic- nemus magnirostris of ‘Temminck. To the synonymes of Ortygodes, Vieill., add Ortyzelos, Vieill. The Hemipodius nivosus, Sw., has the neck and breast ferruginous with white spots, and is therefore perhaps distinct from Ortygodes meiffrent. The earliest specific name of Pluvianus melanocephalus (Gm.), is P. egyptius (Lin.). P. 65. The specific name of Squatarola, viz. cinerea, Ray, ought not (for reasons above given) to supersede Linnzeus’s name helvetica. Lesson, in his Traité d’Ornithologie, has made it almost certain yy 38 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary that the Corrira italica, Gm., is the Dromas ardeola, Paykull; but as long as any doubt remains, it is better to retain the latter name as Mr. Gray has done. P.66. The four genera, Egretta, Ardeola, Botaurus and Nyctico- raz, originated, not with Brisson, but the two first with Bonaparte, and the two last with Stephens. For Tigrisoma lineata read T. lineatum. (All words ending with soma, stoma, &c., are neuter.) Ought not the genus Herodias, Boié, as restricted by Bonaparte, to be kept distinct from Egretta? P.67. For Leptoptilos write Leptoptilus. (The terminal os in Greek is always made us in correct Latin.) The specific name arga/a is Latham’s, not Gmelin’s; but as Gmelin’s name dubia, though prior, implies an erroneous proposition, for the species is not dubious, Latham’s name may be allowed to stand. The genus /éis was founded, not by Brisson, but by Lacepéde. The genus Falcinellus, attributed to “‘ Ray,” is, I believe, now first established by Mr. Gray. If retained, a new specific name will be wanted for the European bird, as Colonel Sykes is of opinion (Proc. Com. Zool. Soc. pt. ii. p. 161) that the Tantalus igneus, Gm., is distinct from T. falcinellus, Lin. It would, however, be far better to give a new name to this genus, if a genus it be, the name Falci- nellus being pre-occupied by Cuvier, who asserts that Vieillot changed it to Erolia. P.68. The genus Numenius, ‘“‘ Ray,’’ was founded by Latham. Limosa, “ Briss.,”’ was first used generically, I believe, by Leisler, and Totanus, ‘‘ Ray,” by Cuvier, 1802. The name Guinetta, ‘‘ Briss.,” is now first used generically by Mr. Gray, and therefore should not supersede Actitis, Ill., as restricted by Boié. P.69. For Macroramphus write Macrorhamphus. P.70. I have been quite unable to reduce the synonymes of the genus Rhynchea into order, and Mr. Gray would do a good work if he would publish a monograph of this genus with all the synonymes at full length, and with the distinctive characters of the species. Mr. Gray must be in error when he unites the Scolopax paludosa, Gm. (S. undulata, Bodd.) with S. sabini, Vig. Bonaparte, in his elaborate monograph of the genus Scolopax, in the ‘ Osserv. Cuv. Rég. An.’ p. 123, describes S. paludosa, Gm., as having the beak 33 inches long, and the lateral rectrices ‘‘ angustissimi, acuminati,”’ characters which do not apply to S. sabini, which Bonaparte there calls (after Vieillot) S. sakhalina. I cannot approve of separating Scolopar gallinula, Lin., generi- cally from the other Snipes ; but those who do so should retain the name Gallinago (founded by Stephens) for the true Snipes, and call the S. gallinula, Philolimnus, Boié. At any rate, the specific name gallinula, Lin., should not be superseded by a term used previously to the binomial System. The specific name /obatus, Wils., should not be given to Stegano- pus, because it was used by Wilson under the erroneous impression on Mr. G. R. Gray’s § Genera of Birds, 39 that this bird was the Tringa lobata, Gm. The specific name wil- soni, Sab., seems to be next in priority, and should therefore stand. Is Steganopus, Vieill., prior to Holopodius, Bon. ? The family Palamedeide will probably require to be remodelled. Although not prepared to go into details at present, I think it pro- bable that the Parrine and Palamedeine would be better arranged under Rallide, and Megapodine divided between the Turdide and the Cracide. P.71. The earliest specific name of Menura, is superba, given by Davies in the Linnean ‘Transactions in 1800. The term Ortygometra, or ‘‘ Mother of the Quails,’’ was an old name applied by Aristotle, Aldrovandus, Ray and Brisson to the Corn Crake; therefore, when Bechstein divided these short-beaked Rails from the rest of the genus Radlus, no term could have been more appropriate; but unfortunately he neglected to use it, and preferred the term Crer. Now as Bechstein was the first to define the genus, the name Crer must be retained, and Ortygometra can- celled, since it would not be correct to retain the latter (as Bona- parte does) for the remaining group (Porzana, Vieill.), in which the Corn Crake is not included. The name Ocydromus australis (Sparm.) has the priority of pub- lication over O. troglodytes, Gm. P.72. The genus Gallinula was founded by Latham. The Heliornine would, I think, enter more naturally among the Colymbide than among the Raillide, though they certainly connect the two groups. The Phenicopterine ought not to be included in the Anatide. They surely form too marked a group to be placed on a par with the subdivisions of Linnzeus’s genus dnas. They should rather be made into a distinct family, and be placed near the Ardeade, to some of which (Platalea and Ibis) they show an affinity in the scarlet plumage, a colour wholly unknown among the Anatide. P.73. Chlephaga should be written Chloéphaga. The genus Bernicla, ‘“ Briss.,’”’ was founded by Stephens, 1824, and Cygnus, “ Briss.,’”’ by Vieillot, 1816. P. 74. Querquedula owes its foundation as a genus to Stephens, 1826. To the synonymes of Micropterus cinereus add Oidemia patachonica, King. Oidemia should be written Gdemia. Add to its synonymes Ma- ceranas, Less. To the synonymes of Somateria add Platypus, Brehm. The genera Fuligula and Harelda were first published by Ste- phens, 1824. For Kamptorhynchus write Camptorhynchus. P.76. The Mergide should not be regarded as a distinct family from the Anatide ; they are only narrow-beaked Ducks, forming a subfamily allied to Fuliguline. For Podicepsine write Podicipine. It surely savours of hypercriticism to divide the Little Grebes (Sylbeocyclus, Bon.) from Podiceps. 40 Mr. Strickland on Gray’s Genera of Birds. P.77. The generic name Catarrhactes, Briss., should be used in- stead of Hudyptes, Vieill., and the specific name demersus, Lin., in- stead of chrysocome, Forst. ‘This genus Catarrhactes of Brisson is prior in date to Brunnich’s genus, which he called Catarrhacta (Lestris, Ill. restr.). The genus Mergulus was first defined by Vieillot, 1816. An h should be inserted after the r in Synthliboramphus and Pty- choramphus. P.78. Wagellus, “Ray,” is now first introduced as a genus by Mr. Gray, and therefore should not supersede Fulmarus, Leach. The name Catarrhacta, Brunn., being too near Catarrhactes, Briss., should give way to Lestris, Ill. P. 79. Chroicocephalus should be written Chrecocephalus. The name Gygis alba (Sparr.) is prior in date of publication to G. candida (Forst.). The true type of Viralva, Leach, as exhibited by Stephens, is the Black Tern (Sterna nigra, Lin.). Therefore Boié’s name Gelocheli- don should be retained for the genus which contains Sterna an- glica, Mont., and the name Viralva (first published in 1825) sinks into a synonyme of Hydrochelidon, Boié, 1822, which is typified by S. nigra, Lin. Also note that dnous, Leach, is synonymous with Megalopterus, Boié, and not with Hydrochelidon, Boié, and that Anous niger, Leach, is synonymous, not with Sterna nigra, Lin., but with Megalopterus stolidus (Lin.), Boié. The genera Thalasseus, Boié, Gygis, Wagl., Sternula, Boié, and Hydrochelidon, Boié, appear not to possess structural characters suf- ficient to entitle them to generic separation from Sterna. P. 80. The genera Sula and Fregata were first raised to that rank by Lacepéde in 1799. In concluding this Commentary an apology is due for the length to which it has extended, but I felt it impossible to do justice to Mr. Gray’s book without going into considerable detail. I should be sorry if any person should be led by the number of these criticisms to form an unfavourable idea of the general accuracy of the work. A large proportion of the above remarks rest on questions of opinion, in which Mr. Gray is perhaps as likely to be right as I am; and even where I have detected errors, they are only such as are un- avoidable in the first edition of a work in which so much labour and research is compressed into so small a compass. I conclude there- fore with most heartily recommending the ‘ Genera of Birds’ to the favourable notice of zoologists. Postcripr.—l beg to add one or two remarks which have oc- curred to me since this Commentary went to press. Page | of Mr. Gray’s book. In my remarks on the Vulturine I had not noticed that Temminck has proved the Hgypius of Savigny to be only the young of the Vultur auricularis, Daud. (See Tem. Man. Orn. part iv. p.586.) Therefore the generic name Agypius should be given to the group containing V. auricularis and pondice- rianus. P. 4. Asturina cinerea, Vieill., is said by Cuvier to be the same as Falco nitidus, Tem., Pl. Col. 87. If this be the case, Asturina might On Mr. Swainson’s Views of Natural Arrangement. 41 stand as a distinct genus, being quite different from Cymindis. (N.B. Temminck’s Pl. Col. 87. can hardly be the F. nitidus of Latham, whose expression ‘‘ legs long,’ agrees better with the F’. hemidacty- lus, Tem. Pl. Col. 3.) The genus Astur was founded by Lacepéde in 1799, and is there- fore clearly prior to Dedalion, Sav. VI.— Mr. SuucKkarp on his falsely alleged participation in Mr. Swainson’s views of Natural Arrangement. To the Editors of the Annals and Magazine of Natural History. GENTLEMEN, I apPEAL to you to do me justice against the impression that may be made by what professes to be an “ Analytical notice of the 129th volume of Lardner’s Cabinet Cyclopedia, enti- tled, ‘ On the History and Natural Arrangement of Insects,’ by [William Swainson, F.R.S., &c., and W. E. Shuckard, Libr. R.S., &c., published in the 3rd Number of ‘ The Ento- mologist,’ written by Mr. Newman.” In an advertisement prefixed to this volume of Lardner, dated from my residence, and of course emanating from me, I said, “Those paragraphs in this volume with the initials “ IV. E. Sh. are written by Mr. Shuckard, and where several “of these follow each other they are affixed to the last only ; “but the system of classification is exclusively Mr. Swain- “son’s.” Now, notwithstanding this, which it will be seen below that the *‘ Analyst’? was aware of, he says in the first page of his notice*, “ I will now endeavour to show the views * entertained by Messrs. Swainson and Shuckard on the sub- “ject:” thus clearly identifyimg me with the whole scheme, for following this is given the dry systematic frame of the work. He then says, “A glance at this arrangement will * convince the reader that no charge of plagiarism can possi- “bly be brought against its authors:” thus confirming my identification with the system: and a line or two beneath this he again says, “ If the views of Messrs. Swainson and Shuckard ** display the slightest approach to nature, then are those of * Mr. Macleay the most distorted, wild and unnatural: there “is no point of similarity between the systems, except the “ frequent recurrence of the number Five. The bold altera- “tion made by the authors in separating the Diptera from ** winged insects, is the most striking feature in the new ar- “rangement; it proves them to be profound and original * thinkers, and not only this, it displays an inditference to the * The Entomologist, No. III. p.38. 42 Mr. Shuckard on the Views of Arrangement “ opinions of others, which must be the result of the mens “ conscia recta.” Would you think it possible, gentlemen, that this repetition of my assumed identity with the system of Mr. Swainson could be made in the face of this Latin phrase, and of the prefixed advertisement? and you will scarcely believe me when I tell you that their writer, at the end of the article, says, very coolly, at the bottom of this same page*, “I have “been led from its title to assign the merits of this volume “ conjointly to Messrs. Swainson and Shuckard, and have “been treating them like the Siamese twins, as inseparable “in fame; but fairness compels me to add that the system “ of classification is entirely Mr. Swainson’s. Mr. Shuckard “has most ingenuously disavowed any share in this, the great “feature of the work, and I am compelled to place the “ chaplet of laurel on the brows of Mr. Swainson alone,— “ nalmam qui meruit ferat !” One would have supposed, if “ fairness” was to have any influence in the matter, that the writer being fully aware, as he here shows himself to have been, that I had no participation whatever in Mr. Swainson’s system of classification, it would have “ compelled” him to abstain froin carrying on through the whole of his article these imputations, which he with such amusing naiveté confesses he all the while knew to be un- founded: and is it not rather surprising that, having been driven thus to strangle these his unfortunate offspring from despair of being able to maintain them, he should not at once have quietly buried them out of the way, rather than leave their remains exposed to testify against their parent and their executioner ? It would be superfluous for me to make any re- mark ; his own statement is sufficient to give your readers an idea of the fairness to be expected in such ‘analytical notices.’ No man has a right to complain of his own scientific views being fairly discussed, but every man has a right to repulse the attribution of views which he does not hold. My own ideas of ‘system’ must be known to many entomologists ; for what I formerly said in my ‘ Essay on the Fossorial Hy- menopterat,’ and subsequently repeated in this journal as * The Entomologist, p. 40. + Page 1l. I conceive that when all the created species are fully ascer- tained, the true system will be found to be neither circular, square, nor oval, neither dichotomous, quinary, nor septenary, but a uniform meshwork of organization, spread like anet over the universe. But what gaps remain to be filled! We are truly as yet scarcely upon the threshold of the great temple, and consequently still remote from the adytum where the veiled statue reposes. We have not yet learnt our alphabet, for species are the letters whereby the book of Nature must be read. London, 1835. of Mr. Swainson and Mr. Newman. 43 lately as July last *, ought to secure me from the suspicion of being wedded to any of these dictatorial systems, which conveniently contrive that where gaps occur in their hypo- theses the creatures are yet to be found that must fill them, and where inconvenient redundancies exist in Nature, these are made to merge in groups to which they have no osten- sible affinity. To such systems may be applied the judicious observations of the reviewer of Gcethe’s ‘ Theory of Colours + :’ they ‘intentionally obscure what they cannot illustrate, and *“ affect to be profound when they are only disguising their ig- * norance.” I have not even faith in the Septenary system f, although that is illuminated by the seven golden candlesticks § of Solomon’s temple||, and has found in the sabbath an hebdo- madal repose from the labours of such crude concoctions, but of which Burmeister said, “ what is good in it is not new, and what is new is not good,” and this has since been re- peated here by a very courteous friend** of the author of the system. ‘Trusting that this appeal to your candour and sense of justice will not be in vain, I subscribe myself, gen- tlemen, Your very obedient servant, W. E. SHUCKARD. 31 Robert Street, Chelsea, Feb. 4, 1841. * At the conclusion of the ‘ Monograph of the Dorylidz,’ where I said, “The object I have pursued in studying Natural History has been to ascer- tain facts, or in their absence the closest possible approximation to them ; for I am sure, to use the words of our great bard, ‘ Nature is made better by no mean, But Nature makes that mean.’ And she is too protean in her disguises to be fitted by any boddice we may choose to invest her with.” + Edin. Review, Oct. 1840, p. 141. t Sphinzx vespiformis, by Edward Newman. London. 8vo. 1832. § Were I disposed to cavil at such a display as the adduction of these numbers, made evidently in good earnest, and not sportively, for really it would have been too profane to have cited Scripture in jest, I might ob- ject to the incorrectness of the Septenary’s attribution of seven candlesticks to Solomon's temple ; for they consisted of ten, five being placed on the right side and five on the left of the oracle (an argument in favour of the quina- rians!), and Moses’s single candlestick had but six branches, although, it is true, seven lamps were suspended from it; but seven candlesticks occur only in the vision of St. John at Patmos, which shows what a fantastical affair a system founded upon these seven candlesticks must be. I trust that when the ‘ Septenary’ dveams again, his revelation will be more pertinent than it is in the present instance. \| Sphinx vespiformis, by Edward Newman. London. 8vo. 1832. Page 15. §| Wiegmann’s Archiv. vol. i. No. 4. ** Westwood’s Introduction to the Classification of Insects, vol. i. p. 20. 44 Excerpta Botanica. VII.—Excerpta Botanica, or abridged Extracts translated Strom the Foreign Journals, illustrative of, or connected with, the Botany of Great Britain. By W. A. Le1auron, Esq., BEA, EB 39. E., ec. No. 5. On the Anther of Chara vulgaris and Chara hispida, and the Animalcules contained in it. By M. Gustavus Tuurer. (Ann. des Sc. Nat. vol. xiv. p. 65.) In the axillz of the branches of Chara, immediately below the carpels, are globular sessile bodies, of a vivid red colour, which, entirely disappearing on the approaching maturity of the carpels, are conjectured to perform the functions of sta- mens, although in other respects they possess no analogy of organization with the male organs of Phanerogame. The outer covering of these consists of a membrane formed of transparent cellules, which produce the appearance of a white ring encircling the anther. Under this membrane are irregu- lar oval cellules arranged into triangular valves, each valve being composed of from twelve to twenty cellules radiating from a common centre, and enclosing the red granules which produce the brilliant colour of the anther. On the full deve- lopment of the anther these valves disunite, and permit the bo- dies enclosed in their interiors to expand in the water. Those anthers most remote from the central axis always open first, and those on the lower whorls before those on the upper ones. The interior of the anther is filled with flexuose, transparent, chambered (cloisonnées) filaments, of unequal length, ema- nating chiefly from a central cellular base, from which also radiate a few ovoid utricules, containing orange-coloured gra- nules. Each of these utricules adheres to the cellular base by its narrowest extremity, and is fixed perpendicularly by its largest extremity to the centre of one of the triangular valves. The contained granules are oval, orange-coloured, and arranged in a linear series ; whilst, on the contrary, in the cellules of the valves the granules are round, red, scattered without order, and distant from the walls of the cellules. In these chambered filaments the animalcules are produced. These filaments, when examined in a very young state, appear only as oval utricules enclosing a granular matter, some of them being detached, but the greater number adherent to the cel- lular base before mentioned. A little later these utricules be- come chambered, a nucleus appearing in each chamber or di- vision. The introduction of the water through the walls of the filaments seems to conduce towards the formation of the nucleus, at least such is my conjecture, from having frequently Excerpta Botanica. 45 observed the rapid formation of the nucleus in filaments which previously possessed no traces of it. These nuclei have a slight green tinge, probably owing to an optical illusion, and become brown by iodine. They are always affixed (adossés) to the partitions (cloisons). Gradually they become effaced, and the animalcules begin to be distinguished ; indeed, they are fre- quently observable at one extremity, whilst the nuclei remain at the other, even in the same anther and filament. On the complete formation of the animalcules, the partitions of the chambers are indistinguishable, from the confusion arising from the great number of the curves. At each curvature of the animalcule a swelling (black or brilliant, according to the increase or diminution of focal distance) is perceived, doubt- less owing to the optical illusion produced by the greater thickness of the body at these points of flexion. The animalcules are at first motionless, and remain for a greater or lesser time in the water before they begin to move and struggle to release themselves from their prison. In this they do not always succeed, although their twisted position attests the efforts made for disengagement. Those which do succeed escape laterally by a sudden motion, similar to the elasticity of a slackened spring. After this great effort they remain for some time motionless, or if the temperature and season be unfavourable, their motions are slow and soon cease. On the contrary, the animalcules observed at the end of June and beginning of July agitated themselves with ex- treme vivacity, and in such a manner as to leave no doubt of their animality. They rapidly traversed the field of the mi- croscope in different directions, crossing and meeting each other, and deviating from their route, and after employing the greater portion of the day in observation, they were left in si- milar and unrelaxed motions. The portion of their body most apparent appeared like a spirally-rolled thread of three to five curves (un fil roulé en tirebouchon, formant de 3a5 tours de spire.) They were slightly tinged with green similar to the nuclei, and like them turned brown with iodine; their two extremities becoming more or less coloured (according to the quantity of iodine employed) than the rest of the body, thus indicating a differ- ence of nature in these portions. At a little distance behind one extremity proceed two bristles or tentacula of excessive tenuity, which the animalcule incessantly agitates with great rapidity. These are probably organs of locomotion similar to the filiform prolongation found in the Infusoria without ciliz. Indeed, the part thus furnished with tentacula moves 46 Excerpta Botanica. foremost, drawing after it the rest of the body, which turns about in the water, but always preserves its twrriculate form. The incessant agitation of these tentacula and their extreme tenuity rendered it impossible to observe them in the living animal; recourse was therefore had to the evaporation of the water or to the application of a slight tincture of iodine, when the animalcules ceased their motions, became contracted, and their spiral unrolled, when the tentacula were rendered very distinct, from their brown colour. These tentacula were fre- quently observed to be soldered together from one-half to one- third of their length upwards, but others were also noticed to be entirely separated down to their bases. A swelling similar to that in the flexure of the body was perceived in their curves. Ammonia arrested their motions and contracted the body gradually into a small oval mass, but did not produce the phenomenon of decomposition by solution (difluence) so re- markable in the Infusoria. A very weak solution of chlor- hydric acid in water violently contracted them into a shape- less mass. In escaping from the filaments a portion only of the body of the animalcule was sometimes disengaged, and fruitless ef- forts were made by it to extricate the rest. In such cases it was noticed that the portion bearing the tentacula invariably remained within the tube of the filament. On the filaments becoming empty, their divisions reappeared very distinctly. No traces of the passage of the animalcule were observed, un- less the brilliant points sometimes seen on each division of the filament be regarded as such. The ovoid utricules accompanying the filaments are sphe- roidal in the young anthers, but subsequently take the form of an egg truncated at both ends, or nearly that of a parallelo- gram, having one of its ends narrower than the other. Their wall or paries is transparent, the orange granules contained in them being of an elongated form, and lying in longitudinal lines in the direction of the currents of circulation, their upper extremity alone being destitute of them. In the interior of the utricules is frequently an oval globule, generally motionless, but sometimes circulating with greater or less rapidity along the walls. Besides this globule, which is apparently formed of a granular fluid, are seen the rapid currents ascending and descending longitudinally. These two circulations, which are doubtless different appearances of the same phenomenon, occur either together or separately in the same utricule. In some utricules the globule was motionless, Mr. Babington on Saxifraga umbrosa. 47 whilst three round and thick orange-coloured granules ascend- ed and descended together rapidly along the same line of cir- culation, and continued visible from one extremity to the other. After long immersion of the utricules in water, the arrange- ment of the orange-coloured granules apparently proved the existence of a double sac in which the granules were contained. The circulation in this case was similar to that described by Mr. Slack im hairs of Tradescantia (Trans. Soc. Arts, vol. xlix. p.41). ‘Each articulation appeared to consist of an exterior glassy tube. Between this and the colouring matter was the circulating fluid with its molecules. The coloured fluid of the hair appeared to be enclosed in a membranous sac, which formed an axis around which the fluid circulated.” On crushing the anther there were observed some purple hairs formed of an immense quantity of granules of extreme minuteness, endowed with a very quick molecular motion. Iodine rendered the orange granules green. Alcohol did not dissolve them. ‘The latter did not arrest the circulation of the nucleus in the ovoid utricules, although it instantane- ously killed the animalcules. VIII.—Notes on Saxifraga umbrosa: By Cuaruess C, Ba- BINGTON, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S., &c.; and by the Reviewer of Baines’s ‘ Yorkshire Flora.’ In the 39th Number of these Annals (vol. vi. p. 401), the Rev. W. T. Bree expresses his doubt if the Sazxifraga umbrosa is “in fact a genuine native of Britain ;” and if he had said Great Britain, I should have been inclined to say that it has all the appearance of having been introduced, and that much more evidence is requisite before we ought to admit it to have been a genuine native. Concerning Ireland, however, I must ex- press quite the contrary opinion, being convinced that there is no plant that has a more decided claim to be considered as certainly indigenous. I have myself seen it in the greatest plenty upon the wild mountains of Connamara and Joice’s county, but certainly did not notice it in the neighbourhood of Killarney, where S. Gewm is peculiarly abundant. It is worthy of notice, that the plant found in Connamara differs as a variety from the Pyrenean plant, by having its leaves dentate, crenate, and not simply and bluntly crenate, as in the plant from the Pyrenees. The figure given in Eng. Bot. (t. 663), which was taken from a specimen gathered at Throp Arch woods, in Yorkshire, approaches much more 48 Mr. T. C. Eyton’s Notes on Birds. nearly to the foreign than to the Irish plant ; and I have reason to believe that all the ‘ London Pride’ found “ wild” in Great Britain will prove to be the blunt crenate-leaved plant, and to have escaped from cultivation, or been intentionally planted. St. John’s Coll., Cambridge, Feb. 8, 1841. On Saxifraga umbrosa. Tne writer of the notice of Baines’s ‘ Yorkshire Flora’ begs to state, in reference to Mr. Bree’s paper, that he mentioned Sax- ifraga umbrosa as abundant in the west and south of Ireland, in consequence of having seen it himself in great quantity in the west of the county of Cork during a botanical tour made in the year 1811, and having heard from friends whom he considered as good judges, that it is equally common in Con- naught. He considered himself as knowing S. hirsuta and S. Geum at the time he made the tour referred to; and he is confirmed in the belief that he did not commit an error, by having now before him a MS. journal of a rather more ex- tended tour through the same district in 1809 by Mr. James Drummond, then curator of the Cork Botanic Garden, from which it appears that Mr. Drummond found S. umbrosa abundantly in the county of Cork, and also met with both Geum and hirsuta in the mountains between Cork and Kerry. The station of S. wmbrosa at Thorpe Arch would be very suspicious, had it not been noticed before the grounds were ornamented as they are at present, and by such an accurate botanist as, for example, the late Rev. W. Wood of Leeds. Respecting the other Yorkshire stations the writer can give no opinion. 1X.—WNotes on Birds. By T. C. Eyron, Esq., F.L.S. Now: I propose in the following series of papers to give from time to time such extracts from my note-book relating to Birds as I think likely to prove interesting to my readers ; the first por- tions will be principally occupied with anatomical notes on some Australian Birds received from Mr. Gould, and on some received from Malacca. With regard to the former birds, it is not my intention to go minutely into detail, or further than what I believe to be necessary to show the position of each in a natural arrangement. I take this course, as I understand that eminent anatomist, Mr. Owen, has undertaken to fur- nish Mr. Gould, for his work on the ‘ Birds of Australia,’ with a more detailed account. Mr. T. C. Kyton’s Notes on Birds. 49 Menura Lyra, Shaw. Male. Tongue tapering towards the tip, which is slightly bifid, blunt, and furnished with a fringe of bristles; the centre concave, and fur- nished posteriorly with two strong spines on each side at the base, between which is a row of smaller ones. Trachea of nearly uniform diameter throughout the rings, broad as far as its entrance into the thorax, afterwards rounded and nar- row, with a large membranous space between them; they are ar- ranged somewhat obliquely, as in the bulb found on the trachea of Clangula vulgaris. Bone of divarication Y-shaped. Upper bones of the bronchiz are semicircular, the uppermost largest, the next being _ inclosed in its arc; the fourth is much flattened, thickest and broad- est anteriorly, and with a prominent knob on its anterior extremity, from which it gradually tapers towards the posterior end, where it is somewhat falciform and suddenly narrowed to a point. The next, or fifth bone, is also much flattened, and straight for two-thirds of its length, when it also becomes suddenly falciform, with the point of the hook turned downwards. In addition to the usual sterno-tracheal muscles, this curious bird has two other pair, both of which have their origin on the rings of the trachea on each side, at the point where it enters the cavity of the thorax. The anterior pair is inserted on the knobs at the extre- mities of the fourth bones of the bronchi; the posterior pair are also inserted on the bronchiz, but on the three uppermost rings, and on the posterior extremity of the fifth. Besides these muscles, which are very strong, additional support is given to the portion of the trachea over which they extend, by a tendon arising at the same point with the last-mentioned pair of muscles, but between them, and extending to the eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth rings of the bronchiz, on each of which it is partially inserted: this arrangement gives the bird a great power of shortening or lengthening that por- tion of the trachea over which the muscles extend. The cesophagus is small at the upper extremity, slightly enlarged in the middle and towards the proventriculus, the coats of which are not much thicker than the cesophagus itself ; nor is it contracted at its entrance into the stomach. The stomach is of moderate size, mus- cular, and has a large internal cavity, which was filled with seeds, the remains of insects and small pebbles. The epithelium, or mem- brane lining the stomach, hardened and rugose, particularly on the grinding surfaces ; it measures 13 inch in length, and 1 inch in breadth. The total length of the intestinal canal, measuring from the py- lorus to the cloaca, is about 3 feet 10 inches, that of the rectum 3? inches; the diameter of the duodenum is equal to that of the rec- tum, that of both being 3 of an inch; the ceca are scarcely more than rudimentary, measuring only 4 an inch in length; the cloaca is of moderate size, and situated about 1 foot 7 inches above it, and at- tached to the small intestine is found the remains of the vitelline duct (ductus vitello-intestinalis). Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. i 50 Mr. T. C. Eyton’s Notes on Birds. The skeleton at first sight is chiefly remarkable for the large size and length of the bones of the legs and feet. ‘The sternum is long and narrow, measuring from the anterior extremity of the manubrial process 3 inches, and transversely, just behind the junction of the co- racoids, where it is narrowest, ;8,ths of an inch ; its posterior margin is indented by two slight lateral fissures, between which it is much rounded and projects posteriorly ; the lateral margins are slightly curved inwards ; the broadest part of the sternum is near its poste- rior extremity, where it measures 1 inch and 4 tenths. ‘The inden- tation in which the lesser pectoral muscle lies is very deep, rises into a ridge on the lateral margin, and is continued from the junc- tion of the coracoids about half-way along the sternum ; the ante- rior edge of the keel is slightly curved backwards, the inferior edge is a little rounded and continued to the posterior margin of the ster- num; the manubrial process is very long and bifurcate at its extre- mity ; the coracoids are of moderate length and strength. ‘The os furcatum is light, slightly flattened, arched, and with only a very small process at its sternal extremity. ‘The scapula is slightly falci- form, of moderate length and size, reaching backwards to the third true rib. ‘The wing-bones are short, but strong. The bones composing the pelvis are precisely what might be ex- pected to be found in a bird possessing sucha large tail; it measures 2 inches and ;%ths in length, and 1,%ths in breadth ; the iliac bones are broad, but form a lengthened process on each side of the caudal vertebre for the attachment of the levator muscles of the tail. The ischium is also broad, and placed nearly perpendicularly to the plane of the ilium. ‘The ischiadic foramina are large and rounded; the sides of the pelvis are much compressed from the point at which they penetrate to the posterior margin, the bones of the ilium being expanded beyond, and overshadowing, as it were, those of the ischium ; the os pubis is narrow and curved upwards beyond its se- cond junction with the ischium. The obturator foramen is of mo- derate size and oval; the cotyloid cavity for the reception of the head of the femur is deep, and has the hinder portion of its upper edge very protuberant. ‘The ribs are eight in number, five true and three false : two of the false ones are placed anteriorly and one pos- teriorly; the latter has a sternal rib attached, but it does not arti- culate with the sternum ; the upper portions of the ribs next the ver- tebrae are much flattened, but they become thicker and narrower as they approach the appendage on their posterior margin, which is slightly turned upwards, and of moderate strength. : The numbering of the vertebr, as near as could be ascertained from a natural skeleton, is*, Cer. 12; Dor. 6; Sac. 12? Caud. 9, The * T have followed the same plan in the enumeration of the vertebrz here as I did in the ‘ Monograph on the Anatide,’ viz. by considering all those which are anterior to the ribs and have no attachment to them, cervical ; those anterior to the pelvinal bones and having ribs attached to them, dor- sal ; those which are anchylosed together immediately succeeding the dorsal, sacral; to some these ribs are sometimes attached : and those immediately succeeding these, and not anchylosed to them, caudal. Mr. T. C. Eyton’s Notes on Birds. 51 lateral processes of the caudal vertebre are much prolonged, parti- cularly those of the last four but one; the terminal one is without any lateral process, and nearly triangular. Remarxks.—The extraordinary and doubtful structure of this bird is at once shown by the different places in which it has been arranged by authors; by Cuvier it is placed among the Passeres, by Lesson and Swainson among the Gallina- ceous birds, and by Gray among the Grallatores. The large and powerful legs which Menura possesses in such an eminent degree, has been doubtless the principal reason why it has been classed by the authors above-mentioned among Rasores and Grallatores ; but on minute examination the scutellations of the tarsi will be found to differ from any of the typical birds in either of these orders, and to agree with that of the true Insessores. Another very striking point in the external structure consists in the great length of the claws, their great strength, and in their being rounded and blunt at the points, and attached to toes of moderate size*. Some of the Ral- lide possess lengthened claws, but they are sharp, in general weak and attached to long thin toes, therefore differing from Menura. The Alaudide have the hind toe lengthened, but it is also weak and sharp; some of the Cuculide also have this structure, as the genus Pelophilus, in which the claws are not so much sharpened as in any of the preceding instances. The genus Pteroptochost has precisely the same form of claw as in Menura, and agrees with that genus in many anatomical peculiarities, nearly the only difference being that it has four fissures on the posterior margin of the sternum instead of two. Menura appears to be nearly connected with Megapo- dius, and perhaps with Alecthelia, judging merely from exter- nal characters; but differs from Talegalla, Chauna, Palamedea, Dicholophus, Psophia, Crax, Ourax, Ortalida, Penelope and Lophocerus, with all of which it has been associated in the same family, in presenting an almost total difference in the structure of the tarsi and feet as well as in the form of the bill, which any one who has an opportunity of examining them, or even some of the best plates, will at once perceive. In the structure of the soft parts and digestive organs, Me- nura agrees with that of Insessores ; and with many of them, * On comparing the feet of Menura with those of Insessorial birds, they will not be found, exclusive of the claw, to be of a larger proportion to the size of the bird than many birds among Insessores. + For some account of the anatomy of this genus, see ‘ The Zoology of the Voyage of the Beagle,—Birds.’— Appendix. t This family appears to be a sort of refuge for the destitute. K2 52 Mr. T. C. Eyton’s Notes on Birds. especially with the genus Gallina of Vieillot, in the compli- cated muscular structure of the inferior larynx. The pelvis, as before remarked, is precisely of that form which might be expected to be found in a bird having power- ful legs and a large tail, and therefore presents some similar- ity to the Rasores in this respect, but differs from that order in those portions of it not immediately connected with those parts; thus the obturator foramen in Menura is large, while in Rasores it is small or altogether obliterated ; the extremity of the os pubis is turned upward, while in Rasores it is turned downward; in the former of these particulars it agrees with Insessores and Scansores, but in the latter with most of the Insessores. The structure of the sternum agrees with Insessores in having only two fissures on its posterior margin, but differs essentially from any birds I am acquainted with in that order in being much prolonged backwards and rounded between them. The only approach to this structure that I am aware of is among the Psittacide, some of the Australian Ground- Parrots having nearly the same structure as Pezoporus for- mosus on the posterior margin, with this exception, that fora- mina take the place of fissures *. The os furcatum is slight, and destitute of any terminal pro- cess at its sternal extremity, in which respects it agrees with Scansores. The structure of the ribs, in being much broader above the posterior process, coincides both with many Insessores and Scansores ; but this character is most marked in the latter order. Such is the mixed and doubtful character which Menura shows, but by far the strongest affinity is shown to Insessores ; in which order this genus may form a family with Pteropto- chos, and perhaps with Alecthelia and Megapodiust+, bearing an affinity to Scansores. Although a full account of the habits of this bird may be shortly expected from the pen of Mr. Gould, I shall here remark, that what has hitherto been considered fabulous, namely, that this bird has the power of song, is far from improbable, considering the structure of its * These birds have also the claws and tarsi considerably Jengthened. Some resemblance to the posterior margin of the sternum of Menura is also found among the Scolopacide, in the Common Woodcock for instance; but the remainder of the skeleton is so totally unlike, that I cannot for a moment suppose that any degree of affinity exists. + I venture this opinion with very great doubt; nothing but an anato- mical examination can decide the point; the habit appears to be different. See Freycinet’s Voyage, Zoologie, p. 124. Bibliographical Notices. 53 trachea and muscles. Its affinity to Scansores is also, I think, explained by the great facility with which it scrambles or climbs over rocks and stumps*. I have considered Scansores as distinct from Insessores throughout this paper; and think that ornithologists will, until more is known of the anatomy of birds than at pre- sent, find it convenient to class Birds in the following Orders, which may be distinguished in general by their skeletons :— Raprores, VOLITORES (containing the Fissirostral groups), Scansorgs, Insessores, RAsores, Cursores, GRALLA- ToRES and Nararores. Perhaps the Pigeons also with ad- vantage may be divided from the other Rasorss. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. An Introduction to the modern Classification of Insects, founded on the Natural Habits and Corresponding Organization of the different Families. By J. O. Westwood, F.L.S., &c. 2 vols. 8vo, with Figures. London: Longman and Co. No branch of natural science has made such extraordinary and rapid strides within the last few years in this country as the study of insects. The contrast which it exhibits at the present day, com- pared with its state thirty years ago, is most striking. Then, at the period when we commenced our entomological career, the literature of the science was most meagre and marrowless ; we had, it is true, for our guides Stewart’s ‘ Elements,’ Marsham’s ‘ Coleoptera,’ Ha- worth’s ‘ Lepidoptera,’ and the picture-books of Doudran, estimable works enough in their way, but from which the inquirer who wished to obtain more than aknowledge of the mere name of his species would not derive a particle of philosophy. The minute investigations of the anatomist, the principles of natural classification founded upon the various relations of the different tribes and the variations in the metamorphoses of all insects, save the Lepidoptera, were subjects scarcely dreamt of ; and, in truth, the entomologist merited no other name than that of a collector, his only aim being the getting toge- ther of as great a number of species as possible, and storing them up in his cabinets. The appearance of the first two volumes of the ‘ Introduction’ of Messrs. Kirby and Spence placed the science on a far different foot- ing, showing the inquirer, in a most engaging manner, that it pos- sessed far higher claims to his attention. In these delightful vo- lumes the natural history and ceconomy of the insect tribes were proved to be as interesting and worthy of observation as those of the highest animals. The subsequent appearance of the third and fourth volumes of the same work opened the wide field of insect anatomy and the principles of entomological classification ; thus forming, * See Collins’s Account of New South Wales. 54 Bibliographical Notices. with the preceding volumes, the most complete general ‘ Introduc- tion’ to the study hitherto published. ‘These were shortly followed by the appearance of Mr. Curtis’s beautiful work on the ‘ Genera of British Insects,’ recently noticed in our pages, and by the ‘ Systematic Catalogue and Illustrations’ of Mr. Stephens, the latter consisting of detailed descriptions of all the British species. Besides these, a very considerable number of minor treatises have been produced by authors who have in a great measure been instigated to the pursuit by the establishment of the various ento- mological societies, and whose works are scattered through the pages of numberless English and Foreign Transactions and other similar works. During this period also the principles of natural classifica- tion have been greatly investigated both at home and abroad, but in no work have these principles being applied throughout to the nu- merous families of insects. The object of the present work may be best shown by the follow- ing passages from the preface to the first volume. After noticing the distinction between the general nature of Introductions to Ento- mology and the generic and specific nature of the works of Curtis, Stephens, etc., the author observes that the student has hitherto been ‘‘led at once from the general views he had gained on the sub- ject to the minute technical details of genera and species, there being no work which he could take up to serve as a guide to the develop- ment of the principles of modern classification in the distribution of the orders and families. For years this deficiency has strikingly manifested itself to me, and it is long since I announced my present undertaking, in which I had proposed to myself to show the appli- cation of the modern views which have been entertained relative to the natural relations of animals in the arrangement of the entire groups of winged insects ; illustrating the subject by details of the natural habits, transformations, and structure of the different fami- lies? The work opens with a series of general observations upon the class of Insects, their general structure and transformations, and the various systems of Swammerdam, Linneus, Fabricius, Latreille and MacLeay, the respective authors of the metamorphotic, alary, ciba- rian, eclectic, and representative systems. The arrangement adopted by the author nearly corresponds with that of MacLeay, the orders of Hexapod, Metamorphotic Insects (which are alone treated upon in this work), being divided into two parallel sub-classes. Each order with its sections is then passed in review, ample details being given of the characters, structures, habits, transformations, and general dis- tribution and relation of the different families, with an illustration of their characteristic anatomical details and preparatory states. It is thus that the author has endeavoured to make his work a fitting c Sequel’ to the ‘Introduction’ of Kirby and Spence, whilst at the same time it will be found equally, if not still more, useful to the student who would extend his inquiries beyond the details of genera and species : in this respect it forms an equally fitting precursor to the works of Curtis, Stephens, etc. A few extracts, however, will Bibliographical Notices. 5a more satisfactorily show the manner in which the author has treated the subject in its various bearings; we will therefore take the distri- bution of the Coleoptera, which has lately been the subject of much discussion, as an example of the manner in which the natural classi- fication of insects is treated. After reviewing the arrangements of Linneus, Latreille, MacLeay, etc. (that of the last-named author being founded upon the analogical relations of the preparatory states and the asserted inaccuracy of the tarsal system), the author observes, in addition to our ignorance of the larvae of many import- ant groups, ‘‘ that Mr. MacLeay himself admits the existence of a variation in the tarsal structure concurrent with the variation in the form of the larve, a circumstance dependent, as it seems to me, upon the principle that modifications of the preparatory states of an insect ought merely to be regarded as indications of corresponding peculiarities in the final state, the former modifications being subor- dinate to those observed in the imago, and having, in fact, been un- dergone with a direct view to the perfection of the insect. We might indeed carry the subject still further. ‘Thus, whilst the intimate connexion existing throughout the whole of the Tetramerous Beetles cannot be denied, yet Cerambyx has a subvermiform and Chryso- mela an anopluriform larva; whilst the latter and Coccinella (Mr. MacLeay’s two examples of the Anopluriform Stirps), although agreeing in the larve, are totally different in the habits and in the structure of the tarsi of the imago.”’ After some further observa- tions, he adds, that “ The Coleoptera are therefore divisible into the four following sections: 1. Pentamera, in which all the tarsi are 5- jointed, the fourth being of ordinary size; 2. Heteromera, in which the four anterior tarsi are 5-jointed, and the two posterior 4-jointed ; 3. Pseudotetramera (or Subpentamera, Tetramera, Latreille, Crypto- pentamera, Burm.), in which the tarsi are 5-jointed, but the fourth joint is exceedingly diminutive, and concealed between the lobes of the preceding; 4. Pseudotrimera (or Subtetramera, Tetramera, Latr., Cryptotetramera, Burm.),in which the tarsi are 4-jointed, the third joint being very diminutive, and concealed between the lobes of the preceding.” As a specimen of the structural details, the following account of the structure of the mouth of the preparatory states of the May-fly (Ephemera vulgata) may be quoted :—‘‘ Considering the rudimental nature of the mouth of the imago, it is surprising that no one has hitherto described the real structure of the mouth in the preparatory states. Reaumur has attempted it, but his figures are so rude and in- sufficient, that no idea can be gleaned as to their true structure ; Swammerdam also passes them over undescribed. In the pupa of E. vulgata the upper lip is of moderate size, with the anterior angles rounded off and ciliated ; it is flat and quite membranous : the mandibles are horny, armed with several teeth within, near the base, which is dilated into a flattened molary plate, whilst the upper angle of the mandible is produced into a long curved horn, The maxille are small, membranous, curved, pointed at the tip and internally se- tose : the maxillary palpi do not extend beyond the front of the head ; 56 Bibliographical Notices. they are 4-jointed, the basal joint being very short: the lower lip is very large and membranous, covering the under side of the mouth; it is quadrilobed and furnished within with a broad tongue, of which the anterior angles are produced and pilose; the labial palpi are broad and 3-jointed.” The account of the proceedings of the Ant-lion may be taken as an example of the manner in which the natural history of the various families is treated :— “Tt is in very fine sand that the larva makes its pitfall. When placed upon the surface, it bends down the extremity of the body, and then pushing, or rather dragging, itself backwards by the assist- ance of its hind legs, but more particularly of the deflexed extremity of its body, it gradually insinuates itself into and beneath the sand, constantly throwing off the particles which fall upon, or which it shovels, with its jaws or legs upon its head, by suddenly jerking them backwards, ‘Ossaque post tergum magne jactata parentis.’ ‘“« Proceeding in this manner, in a spiral direction, it gradually di- minishes the diameter of its path, and by degrees throws so much of the sand away, as to form a conical pit, at the bottom of which it then conceals itself, its mandibles, widely extended, being the only parts that appear above the surface ; with these, any luckless insect that may happen to fall down the hole is immediately seized and killed. When the fluids of the victim are exhausted, the Ant-lion, by a sudden jerk, throws the dry carcass out of the hole; should, ‘however, the insect by chance escape the murderous jaws of its enemy, the latter immediately commences throwing up the sand, whereby not only is the hole made deeper and its sides steeper, but the escaping insect is probably hit, and again brought down to the bottom of the pit. It is chiefly upon ants and other soft-bodied in- sects that these larve feed. ‘Chey are, however, capable of under- going long fasts, for one of my larve remained from October till March without food. It has been supposed that, as the food of these larvee consists entirely of juices, and as they appear to be destitute of anal aperture, the whole of their food is assimilated. M. L. Du- four has, however, traced the intestinal canal terminating in an anus, which is, indeed, very difficult to discover. (Ann. Soc. Ent. de France, tom. il. p.67. App.) Latreille states that these larve are produced in the summer or autumn, and become pupz in the follow- ing spring. I found the larve of all sizes in July, one of which became a pupa, and assumed the perfect state; whilst another, of equal size, remained through the winter in the larva state. Previous to assuming the pupa state, the larva forms a globular cocoon of less than half an inch in diameter of fine sand, glued with silken threads spun from a slender telescopic-like spinneret placed at the extremity of its body, and lined with fine silk. The pupa is small, not being half an inch long, inactive, and with all its limbs laid at rest upon the breast. When ready to assume the perfect state it uses its man- dibles, which are quite unlike those of the larva and imago, and Bibliographical Notices. is | which have not been before described, to gnaw a hole through the cocoon, and pushes itself partly through the aperture, in which it leaves the pupa skin.” The work is illustrated with a coloured plate, containing examples of most of the orders, and by nearly 2500 figures representing the types of the different families, with their preparatory states and struc- tural peculiarities, there being not fewer than 340 figures of perfect insects, and more than 420 of larvee and pup. Another important feature in the work, and one which we can well believe must have cost the author very great labour, is the bibliographical references to each of the families. These cannot fail to be of infinite service to, the student, as they contain notices of every paper or detached me- moir of the least value published on the subject up to the date of the work. At the same time, in order to render it still more useful, a com- plete synopsis of the British genera, brought down to the present time, is added, and in which are included the characters, synonyms, and authorities of the genera, the number of British species, and name of the type, with a reference to a figure of the genus. Having thus given our readers an insight into the comprehensive nature of the work before us, we must observe, that the discussion of the relations of the different families, and of the views entertained thereof by pre- ceding writers, appears too much detailed. ‘The great extent of the subject, however, and the comparatively slight grounds existing to- wards a perfect classification of the very numerous tribes of insects, have necessarily involved many of their relations in doubt, and of which the discussion cannot fail to be productive of advantage. We also notice a few typographical errors, some of which, however, are corrected in the Appendix. In conclusion, as this work has the rare merit of interfering with no other hitherto published, we cordially recommend it as one rendered necessary by the progress of the science, and as the result of the most laborious research, and conse- quently as deserving, both from its nature and execution, of be- coming a standard work of reference in every zoological library. Otia Hispanica. Auctore P. B. Webb. Pentas 2, 1839. The present number of this valuable work, which has only recently reached us, is occupied by figures and descriptions of five species of Alge, by C. Montague, M.D., and as they are all either new or but little known, we cannot do better than transcribe their specific cha- racters ; we must, however, previously state that each of the species is fully illustrated by magnified dissections, and by a detailed de- scription and copious observations. l. Griffithsia flabellata (Montag.), filis setaceis virgatis, ramis al- ternis pinnatis, pinnis tandem divaricato-recurvis, pimnulis sub- secundis erectis, articulis diametro quintuplo-duplo longioribus, capsulis maximis involucratis—Ceramium et Callithamnion flexuosum, Agardh. Agardh appears never to have seen the fruit of this plant, and 58 Zoological Society. therefore referred it to Callithamnion, to which genus it is closely al- lied in general appearance. Its fruit is that of a Griffithsia. 2. Griffithsia Schousboei (Montag. ), repens, intricata, filis dichotomis articulato-constrictis, articulis elliptico-sphericis e geniculis radicellas hyalinas emittentibus. «The absence of fructification causes me to doubt if this is not an abnormal state or a rampant variety of G. corallina (Ag.).” 3. Gigartina conferta (Schousb.), fronde cartilaginea, filiformi, vage ramosa, ramis fasciculatis confertis, ramulos abbreviatos patentes apice incrassato-ovoideos undique emittentibus. 4. Gigartina gaditana (Montag.), fronde cartilaginea, filiformi, di- chotoma, aculeis simplicibus brevissimis subsecundis utrinque attenuatis obsita. Probably closely allied to the Spherococcus armatus (Agardh). 5. Delesseria interrupta (Ag.), fronde membranacea tenerrima, in- terrupte costata, lineari, dichotoma, apice furcata rotundataque. This second number fully supports the high character which had been obtained by its predecessor, and we trust that the work will receive that support which it deserves from the botanists of Britain. PROCEEDINGS OF LEARNED SOCIETIES. ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY. June 23, 1840.—William Yarrell, Esq., V.P., in the Chair. The Rev. F. W. Hope read a paper entitled ‘‘ Observations on the Stenochoride of New Holland, with descriptions of new species.” Of this paper the following is an extract :— Fam. Stenocuorip&#, Leach. Type of the family Stenochorus semipunctatus, Fab. Section 1. Armigeri. Antennis thoraceque spinosis, apicibus elytrorum bidentatis. Sp. 1. Srenocnorus eieas. ‘Sten. ater thorace spinoso inequali, elytris basi nigro flavoque variegatis. . Antenne corpore fere duplo longiores, articulis ternis primis nigri- cantibus, reliquis fusco-ferrugineis, articulis intermediis apice spi- nosis. Caput atrum antice rufo-ciliatum palpis ferrugineis. Tho- rax utringue spinosus spinis brevibus, tuberculatus, rugosus et ater. Elytra bidentata, basi nigro flavoque variegata, varioloso-punctata. Corpus infra nigrum abdomine postice piceo, femoribus atris, tibiis tarsisque fusco-brunneis et tomentosis. Long. lin. 183; lat. lin. 54, Hab. In interiori parte Nove Hollandie. This magnificent species, the largest of the genus, was given to Captain Roe, when engaged on his survey of the Australian coast ; it was labelled as coming from the inner country. In Museo Dom. Hope. Sp. 2. Srenocuorus tatus. Sten. fusco-brunneus, thorace cinereo- Zoological Society. 59 tomentoso, elytris flavo brunneoque variegatis. Caput cinereum. Antenne longitudini corporis vie equales. Thorax utrinque spi- nosus, spinis acutis, tomentosus et rugosus, antice binis tuberculis rubro-piceis insignitus. LElytra flavo-brunnea maculisque nigris variegata, macula suturali magna lunulata, ad apicem posita, corpus infra nigrum, pectore pedibus brunneo-piceis, tarsisque aurico- matis. Long. lin. 15; lat. lin. 4. Hab. In Nova Hollandia circa Flumen Cygneum. In Mus. Dom. Hope. Sp. 3. SrenocHoRvus LONGIPENNIS, Sten. atro-brunneus, thorace cinereo, elytris antice flavo variegatis, postice, piceo-brunneis. Antenne longitudine corporis, fusco-flave et tomentose. Thorax utrinque spinosus spinis acutis, ad humeros elytrorum curvatus, rugosus, tuberculo nigro et glabro in medio disci posito. lytra elongata ad apicem parum attenuata, antice brunnea, lineis flavis longitudinalibus variegata, postice reliqua parte disci atro-brunnea. Corpus infra fusco-brunneum, femoribus tibiis pallidioribus et to- mentosis, tarsisque auricomatis. Long. lin. 13; lat. lin. 34. Hab. Van Diemen’s Land. Sp. 4. Srenocuorus Mircuerir. Slen. straminicolor, caput ni- grum antennis flavis, thorace atro-cinereo, elytrisque flavo brun- neogue variegatis. Caput atrum thorace bispinoso, spinis utrinque minutis, disco rugoso atro-cinereo. Elytra pallide flava sutura brunneisque maculis variegata. Corpus infra rubro-brunneum an- nulis abdominis aurato-tomentosis, femoribus et tibiis concoloribus tarsisque aurato-spongiosis. Long. lin. 12; lat. lin. 3}. Hab. In Nova Hollandia. This singularly marked insect I have named in honour of Sir T. Livingston Mitchell, the author of one of the most interesting works which has yet appeared respecting Australia. Sp. 5. Srenocuorvus trrmacutatus. Séen. pallide flavus, antennis pedibus luteis thorace cinereo elytrisque nigro maculatis. Caput piceo-brunneum. Antennis flavis sparsimque tomentosis. Thorax utringue spinosus, spinis brevibus, rugoso-tuberculatus et argenteo- cinereus, scutellum flavum. Llytra ad basin nigra, macula magna ovali pallide flava, ante apicem in singulo posita. © Corpus infra rubro-fuscum et argenteo-tomentosum. Pedibus luteis. This elegant species I received from Captain Roe ; it was captured at the Swan River Settlement. Sp. 6. Srenocnorus opscurus, Donovan. Sten. thorace rugoso spinoso, fuscus elytris antice punctato-rugosis, postice levibus ni- tidis apice bidentatis. Long. lin. 11; lat. lin. 3. This species appears to be of rare occurrence. I have seen only three specimens; all of them were from Van Diemen’s Land. 60 Zoological Society. Sp. 7. Srenocuorvs puncratus, Donovan. Sten. thorace spinoso, Suscus, elytris punctatis antice subrugosis, apice bidentatis maculis tribus flavis. Long. lin. 11; lat. lin. 23. This species I obtained at the sale of the late Mr. Donovan’s in- sects; it was labelled as received from Van Diemen’s Land. ‘The colour of this species in Donovan’s plate is not dark enough; the variety with the basal and medial spots united on the elytra, is by no means uncommon; the species is also liable to vary considerably in size; a small specimen measured only 84 lines long and 2 in width. Sp. 8. Srenocnorvus semiruncratus, Fabricius. Sten. thorace spinoso, fuscus, elytris antice punctato-rugosis, flavo-fasciatis, postice levibus, apice bidentatis macula flava. Vid. Oliv. 4— 67. p. 37, 48; Stenoch. 69. tab. 2. f. 19; Enc. Méth. 5. p. 303, 56; Schonherr. Syn. Ins. vol. i. part 3. p. 404. species 9. Long. lin. 11; lat. lin. 3. The localities of ‘ Brasilia’ and ‘ Nova Hollandia’ are mentioned by the latter author ; there cannot exist a doubt that the former locality is erroneous. The species is subject to great variation. I mention some of the most particular. Var. a. Elytris (long. lin. 8 ; lat. lin. 1%) mediis trimaculatis, maculis binis antice parvis, postica triplo majori. Var. (6. Elytris (long. lin. 7 ; lat. lin. 14) late flavo-fasciatis maculis nigris aspersis. Var. y. Elytris (long. lin. 11; lat. lin. 3) late flavo-fasciatis nigris binis maculis notatis, apice late flavo, spinisque concoloribus, an- tennis pedibusque pallidis. This is probably an immature specimen. It is by no means un- common. Sp. 9. Srenocuorvus aneustatus, DeJean. Sten. valde elongatus, parallelus, pubescens, fusco-cinereus, thorace subplicato, conico, lineis duabus albidis. Elytris macula laterali antica, elongata, Susca. Long. lin. 10; tot. 15. In Museo M. M. DeJean et Gory. The above description is taken from the Voyage De |’Astrolabe, by Mons. Boisduval, vide part 2. p. 475. Sp. 10. Srenocnorus unpuLatus. Sten. nigro-brunneus, an- tennis aurato-tomentosis thorace supra tuberculato et concolori, medio disci macula elevata rubro-picea et polita. Scutellum au- reo-tomentosum. Elytra fusco-brunnea, fasciis binis mediis un- dulatis pallide flavis upicibus concoloribus. Corpus infra rubro- piceum pedibus aureo-tomentosis. Long. lin. 10; lat. lin. 24. This species inhabits New Holland, and was sent me by Captain Roe from the New English Settlement at the Swan River in Au- stralia. I must remark that in this species the spines at the apex of the elytra appear unusually short, those at the suture are scarcely Zoological Society. 61 perceptible. I imagine therefore, as the insect is unique and much damaged, that probably they have been broken off. Sp. 11. Srenocnorvs assiminis. Sten. affinis precedenti, rufo- brunneus, antennis concoloribus et tomentosis. Thorax- -rufo- piceus, supra tuberculatus tuberculis quinque elevatis majori- bus ita dispositis :|: reliquis minoribus.. Elytra rufo-brunnea, fascia elongata irregular undulata et flava apicibus flavo-macu- latis. Corpus infra rufum femoribus et tibiis concoloribus et sub-tomentosis tar els auricomatis. Long. lin. 103; lat. lin. 22. I received this insect from Van Diemen’s Land. Sp. 12. Srenocnorus acanruocerus, MacLeay. Sten. fusco-fer- rugineus capite punctato ; antennis rubris, articulo 3%, 4t, 5'° et 6'° apice spinosis ; ore rubro; maaillis elongatis, apice ciliatis membranaceis ; palpis securifor mibus ; thorace obscuro utrinque unispinoso margine antico tuberculisque dorsalibus utrinque pos- tacoque semicirculari rubris ; scutello rubro; elytris rubris fas- cus tribus nigris undatis, ad basin inter lineas elevatas subcre- natis, apicemque versus punctatis, apice bidentatis ; corpore sub- tus nigro nitido tomentoso pedibus rubris. In Mus. Dom. Macleay. Sp. 13. Srenocnorvs porsALis, MacLeay. Sten. fulvo-piceus ca- pite angusto labro palpisque testaceis ; vertice canaliculato ; tho- race meequaliter rugoso eminentia media ovali glabra tribusque aliis utrinque imconspicuis ; elytris bidentatis subelevatis inter- stitusque punctatis macula Wieden suturali testacea antice sub- emarginata ; antennis subtus villosis, articulis apice haud spinosis; corpore pedibusque piceis ; femoribus incrassatis. In Mus. Dom. MacLeay. Hab. In Nova Hollandia. Section 2. Tubericolles. Antennis spinosis, thorace tuberculato haud spinoso, apicibus elytrorum bidentatis femoribusque incrassatis. Sp. 14. Srenocnorus unieutratus, MacLeay. Sten. fuscus capite cum antennis villosis, thorace inequali rugoso, tuberculato. Ely- tris depressis crebrissime punctulatis, in singulo macula quadrato- elongata, et lutea fere in medio disci posita. Corpus infra rubro- Suscum tomentosum femoribus incrassatis et concoloribus, tarsis infra flavo-spongiosis. This species I received from the Swan River : it is subject to great variation in size. A specimen similar to Mr. MacLeay’s Uniguttatus measures in length, lin. 103; lat. lin. 2. It seems likely that Sten. elongatus of DeJean is the same as the above species. Sp. 15. Srenocnorus rHomBirEeR. Sten. affinis preecedenti at multo minor. Fuscus, antennis et corpore sparsim flavo-tomento- sis, capite haud villoso, rubro. Thorax inequalis et tuberculatus. Elytra depressa bidentata, macula quadrato-elongata lutea fere 62 ‘Loological Society. in medio disci posita. Corpus infra rubro-piceum nitidum, binis ultimis segmentis pallidioribus. Pedes rubro-fusci femoribus pa- rum incrassatis tarsisque infra aureo-tomentosis. Long. Jin. 7.; lat. lin. 1}. I received this species in a box of insects from Mr. Charles Dar- win. Its true locality is either Sidney or Van Diemen’s Land. I consider it quite distinct from Mr. Sharpe MacLeay’s Stenocho- rus uniguttatus. In Mus. Dom. Hope. Sp.16, Srenocnorus Tunicatus, MacLeay. Sten. flavus antenna- rum articulis duobus primis nigris quinto apice septimo nonoque nigris ; thorace subcylindrico utrinque unidentato, supra quadri- tuberculato tuberculis anticis majoribus ; elytris apice flavis uni- dentatis, parte basali ultra medium subviolaceo-flava linea ebliqua terminata ; corpore pedibusque flavo-testaceis. In Mus. Dom. MacLeay. Sp. 17. Srenocnorus ruprires, Boisduval. Sten. elongatus paral- lelus ; antennis pedibusque rufis ; thorace angustiort, cylindrico, tuberculato, coleopteris dilute fuscis ; apice spinosis, punctis cre- bris impressis, macula communi maxima irregulari, nigra notata, altera postica, scutelloque flavis. Long. lin. 104; lat. lin. 24. Described from Mons. Boisduval’s ‘ Voyage de |’ Astrolabe,’ vid. part ii. page 479. I had given the name of Undulatus to the species, and had figured it before I was aware of its being described: the sexes apparently differ considerably in size. Sp. 18. Srenocnorus Roger. Sten. rubro-fuscus ; antennis pal- lidioribus ; thorace tuberculato, elytrisque macula irregulari flava notatis, alteraque apicali lutea, spinis apice brevibus, ex- terno longiort. Corpus infra rubro-piceum nitidum pedibus con- coloribus et tomentosis. Long. lin. 63; lat. lin. 1}. This species was sent to me from the Swan River by Captain Roe ; it is named after that indefatigable and enterprising officer. Section 3. Fissipennes. Antennis spinosis, thorace inequali tuberculato seu denticulato, apicibus elytrorum transverse truncatis, haud spinosis. Gen. Corrocrercus*, Hope, Nov. Gen. Caput antice rugosum, antennis spinoso-tomentosis. Thorax fere cylindricus, tuberculatus. lytra parallela thorace latiora ad apicem parum contracta, transverse fissa, haud spinosa. Cor- pus infra convexum, antennis pedibusque fere ut in Sten. Roei conformatis. Type of the Genus, Stenochorus biguttatus of Donovan. Sp. 1. Coprocercus sreurratus, Donovan, vid. pl. 2. fig. 7. * Koptocercus, frem xox, scindo, and xepxos cauda. Zoological Society. 63 Copt. biguttatus, thorace mutico, Jferrugineus, elytris antice punc- tato-rugosis, testaceo-maculatis, bidentatis macula flava. Long. lin. 8; lat. lin. 2. I received this insect from Mr. Donovan, and therefore have no doubt respecting the individual species. The elytra, according to the above description, can scarcely be considered as bidentate; they appear as if they were abruptly broken off at their apex. ‘The sexes vary very much in size. Sp.2. Coprocercus SEXMACULATUS. Copl. niger ; anlennis brunneis ; thorace tuberculato et rugoso; elytris 6 maculis luteis notatis, pedibus rufescentibus. Caput atrum antennis brunneis. Thorax utrinque denticulatus, inequalis, rugosus, tuberculatus, macula media elevata et glabra. Elytra nigra antice varioloso-punctata, postice punctis minoribus. Sex-maculata, macula 1™ lutea paullo infra basin, 2% fere media seu melius fasciata, 3"* apicali pal- lidiore. Corpus infra cinereo-piceum ; pedibus rufo-brunneis. Long. lin. 7; lat. lin. 13. This species, which appears to have escaped the notice of ento- mologists, is abundant. I suspect that the male sex will have the denticulation on each side of the thorax more marked than in the female described. Sp. 3. Coprocercus untrasciatus. Copt. ater thorace inequali tuberculato, elyiris nigris punctatis, et flavo-fasciatis, punctis ternis, maculisque minutis in singulo, inter basin et medialem fasciam positis. Corpus infra rubro-piceum ; pedibus concolori- bus, aureo-tomentosis ; abdomine nigro, et nitido. Long. lin. 6; lat. lin. 14. The above insect I received from Captain Roe, of the Swan River Settlement in New Holland. Section 4. Denticolles. Antennis tomentosis, thorace utrinque spinoso ; dorso dentato ; elytris apice obtusis. Gen. TracHELoracuys*, Nov. Gen. Type of the Genus, Stenochorus fumicolor. Caput exsertum, oculis prominentibus, antennis corpore breviori- bus. Palpi maxillares mandibulis longiores. Antenne 11-ar- ticulate, 1™° cylindrico parum deformi ad basim tenuiori et externe crassiore, 24° brevi subcyathiformi, reliquis fere equa- libus, at extimo minori, apice attenuato. Thorax convexus utrinque spinosus, disco spinis armato. /lytra thorace quad- ruplo longiora, depressa, ad apicem obtuse rotundata et inermia. Pedes simplices, femoribus haud incrassatis. Hab. In Nova Hollandia. TRACHELORACHYS FuMICOLOR. T'rach. fusco-niger ; thorace utrin- que spinoso, disco spinis quatuor fere in medio armato. Elytra parallela marginibus undique elevatis ad basim crebre granu- * The above word is formed of reeynros, collum, and exxis, a spine. 64 Zoological Society. lata, granulis ad apicem e medio elytrorum magnitudine decres- centibus. Corpus infra piceo-nigrum, pedibus pallidioribus et tomentosis, plantisque aurato-tomentosis. Long. lin. 104; lat. lin. 23. This insect was obtained from a collection made in the vicinity of Sydney. TracHeLoracuys pustutatus. Trach. flavo-fuscus antennis to- mentosis ; thorace concolori utrinque spinoso ; spinis binis fere in medio armatis. Elytra marginata; pustulis nigris in lineis sparsim dispositis. Corpus infra fusco-rubrum ; pedibus subto- mentosis. Long. lin. 8; lat. lin. 14. The above insect was purchased out of a New Holland box, along with various nondescripts ; most likely they were from Hobart Town. Section 5. Femorales. Antennis tomentosis ; thorace utrinque spinoso, dorso dentato ; elytris transverse sectis; femoribus incrassatis. Gen. Meropacuys*. Caput exsertum, antennis tomentosis articulis undecim articulatis ; 1™° fere ut in Trach. fumicolori, at externe crassiori et ovato ; 24 previ et globoso; 3"° triplo longiori; 4*° paullo breviori, re- liquis gradatim increscentibus, extimo apice subacuto. Thorawr antice et postice contractus, utrinque in medio spinosus; dorso dentato. Hlyira depressa; thorace latiora postice latiora trans- verse fissa. Yotum corpus supra et infra argenteo sericie asper- sum. Femoribus valde incrassatis in medio fortiter globosis. Meropacuys MacLeail. Merop. fusco-flava antennis flavis to- mentosis, thorace concolori, utrinque spinoso, maculis binis atris, antice et postice signato. Elytra aurato sericie aspersa, ad hu- meros tuberculata, fascia nigricanti ante apicem posita. Corpus infra rubrum nigro et argenteo variegatum. Pedes flavescentes , JSemoribus globosis, nigro-maculatis ; tibits quatuor posticis medio atratis ; tarsisque pallidis binis anticis fere omnino nigris sub- tusque auri-comatis. Long. lin. 8; lat. lin. 1$. This beautifully sericeous insect is named in honour of William Sharpe MacLeay, Esq., from whom we may shortly expect some valuable communications relating to the entomology of Australia. This genus appears to differ chiefly from Trachelorachys in having both the sexes remarkably characterized by their incrassated femora ; and it is probable that, as in other New Holland Stenochoridous ge- nera, the length of the antenne will vary in the sexes. MEROPACHYS TRISTIS. Merop. flavo-fuscus antennis tomentosis, thorace aurato lanugine obsito. E lytra depressa, minulis pustu- lis linear serie insignitis. Corpus infra rubro-piceum sericie * Meropachys is from “xeos, femur, and rayue, crassilies. Zoological Society. 65 aurato tectum. Femora valde incrassata ; tibiis rubro-testaceis ; tarsisque infra auri-comatis. Long. lin. 94; lat. lin. 2. The above species was sent to me by Captain Roe from the vici- nity of the Swan River settlement. There were also other species allied to the present, but they arrived in too mutilated a state to describe. ConicoLueEs. Scolecobrotus Westwoodii. ‘This species was described at p. 109 in the first volume of the Zoological ‘Transactions, and is admirably figured at Plate XV. 2.5. It is remarkable for the joints of the antenne, all excepting the first three appearing as if they were eaten by worms. I have lately obtained from Mr. Fortnum the other sex of this singular insect, and now briefly describe it. The antennz are of a light coral-red colour, which may partly be occasioned by abrasion. The joints of the antennz do not appear serrated as in the former sex, excepting under a high magnifying power, and even then it is scarcely perceptible. The spines at the apex of the elytra are wider apart than in the specimen previously described ; in other respects the insects accord almost entirely. I have reason to think that both the above specimens are from the Swan River settlement, and am not aware that any others are to be found in our metropoli- tan, or even in the French collections. Uracanthus, Hope. For the description of this genus, vide the de- tails published at page 108 of the ‘ Zoological Transactions,’ where only one species was described ; two more are now added. Uracantuts PALLENS. Uracan. affinis precedenti at multo minor. Cervino-brunneus thorace conico et albo-lineato ; elytris palli- dioribus apicibus bidentatis. Caput fronte forte canaliculata pubescenti-allida tectum. Tho- rax alba linea utringue notatus, binisque tuberculis ad latera sub- armatus, rugisque transversis constrictus. Elytra cervino-brunnea, sericea, triangulis in singulo colore saturatiore inquinatis. Cor- pus infra brunneo-sericeum, femoribus parum compressis. Long. lin. 10; lat. lin. 2. I had originally given the name of sericeus to this species, which, as it seems common to all that are now known, I change it at pre- sent to pallens. It was received from Van Diemen’s Land in 1839. UracanTuus MARGINELLUS. Uracan. fusco-brunneus thorace albo- lineato, elytrisque brunneo marginatis. Tolum corpus supra tomentosum, capite porrecto et inter oculos parum sub-canaliculato. Thorax rugis constrictus, tuberculo ulrinque posito. Elytra albo-pubescentia marginibus brunneis apicibus abrupte truncatis, spiis paruin prommentibus. Corpus infra concolor, femoribus compressis. Long. lin. 9; lat. lin. 13. I received this insect from Captain Roe, of the Swan River. In form it approaches a singular genus named Stephanops by Mr. Shuck- Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. F 66 Zoological Society. hard; it is however decidedly an Uracanthus, and there can be little doubt that Stephanops Nasutus of the above author belongs to my section of the cone-necked-shaped Stenochoride. Section Conicolles, Hope. Genus SrroneyLurus, Hope. Type of the Genus Sten. scutellatus, Hope. Vide Zool. 'Trans., vol. i. p. 107. Caput porrectum, oculis prominentibus. Antenne undecim articu- late: articulus 1™"S crassus antice latior quam ad basim; 2° brevi, reliquis gradatim increscentibus, compressis. Thorax coniformis antice et transverse truncatus. Hlytra thorace la- tiora, parallela apicibus rotundatis. Femora in utroque sexu subincrassata, et parum compressa. Sp. 1. SrronGYLURUS SCUTELLATUS. Strong. fuscus et tomentosus, thorace flavo-ochraceo colore utrinque lineato medio disci ngri- cante. Scutellum valde distinctum flavum. Elytra fusco-brunnea, fasctisque undulatis parum distinetis notata. Corpus mfra sor- dide fuscum, abdomine rubro-piceo, pedibus concoloribus et tomen- tosis. Long. lin. 124; lat. lin. 3. The above insect I have received from various parts of New Hol- land; as it is accurately figured, I have not given very full generic details. I must remark, however, that in the sexes of this genus the antenne vary very considerably, in one instance exceeding the length of the body, whilst in the other sex they are shorter than the elytra. These Longicorn beetles also vary much in size, which is a remark that appears to apply to most of the Cerambycide of New Holland. Can the long drought which sometimes prevails in this country be regarded as the cause of dwarfishness, which is certainly one of the striking features of the Coleoptera of Au- stralia? Sp. 2. SrroneyLturus varicornis. Strong. testaceo-fuscus, antennis flavo-nigroque variegatis. Thorace tomentoso utrinque, dentibus atris armato. Scutellum distinctum et album. Elytra Susco-testacea fascus binis undatis parum distinctis. Corpus infra concolor, pedibus tumentosis. Long. lin. 54; lat. lin. 13. There are in our English collections two other species belonging to this genus; as however I have them not at hand, I must leave others to describe them. Genus Corrorrerus, Hope. Type of the Genus Stenochorus Cretifer, Hope. Vide Zool. Trans., vol. i. p. 107. Caput porrectum inter oculos canaliculatum. Antenne compresse, et fere ut in Strongyluro. Thorax obconico-truncatus, lateribus rotundatis. H/ytra thorace latiora parallela; apicibus sub-ob- Geological Society. 67 lique truncatis, seu abrupte sectis. Femora sub-incrassata et q shige : parum compressa; tibiis subincurvis. CoproPTERUS CRETIFER. Copt. fusco-brunneus, capite albida macula inter oculos posita. Thorax nigro-cinereus variis ma- culis cretaceis notatus. Elytra brunnea maculis nigris aspersa, in quibusdam speciminibus macule conjuncte fascias exhibent. . Corpus infra fusco-rubrum maculisque variis albidis obsitum. Pedes rubro-picei et tomentosi. Long. lin. 103; lat. lin. 3. This insect appears to be abundant at Sydney: there are also other allied species undescribed, and from the vicinity of the Swan River. Genus Pizsarturivs, Hope. Type of the Genus Stenochorus marginellus. Vide Zool. Trans., p. 112. Genus 12. Caput exsertum. Antenne valde compresse, 11-articulate. Thoraz fere tetragonus angulis anticis parum rotundatis. E/ytra tho- race paullo latiora parallela, interne spinosa, angulis externis rotundatis. Femora antica quatuor vix incrassata, posteriora minora; tibiis subincurvis. Hab, In Nova Hollandia. PIESARTHRIUS MARGINELLUs. Pvresar. flavo-fuscus antennis com- pressis, tomentosis et pallidis. Thorax niger, lateribus flavo- ochraceis. Scutellum distinctum et flavum. LE lytra testaceo-flava marginibus interne et externe rubro-piceis. Corpus infra brunneo- piceum lateribus pectoris annulisque abdominis utrinque flavo- maculatis, pedibus pallidioribus. Long. lin. 10; lat. lin. 23. This insect I received from Captain Roe of the Swan River, and it is, I believe, unique in our London cabinets. I have seen a second species, but have not been able to obtain permission to describe it. GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, April 29, 1840.—A paper was read, entitled, “ Description of the mains of a Bird, Tortoise, and Lacertian Saurian, from the chalk ;” by Richard Owen, Esq., F.G.S. Bird—tThe three portions of Ornitholite were obtained by Lord Enniskillen from the chalk near Maidstone, and were recognised by him and Dr. Buckland as belonging to some large bird. One of the bones is nine inches in length, and has one extremity nearly en- tire, though mutilated, but the other is completely broken off. The extremity, partially preserved, is expanded. The rest of the shaft of the bone has a pretty uniform size, but is irregularly three-sided, with the sides flat and the angles rounded: its circumference is two inches and a quarter. The whole bone is slightly bent. The spe- cimen differs from the femur of any known bird, in the proportion of its length to its breadth; and from the tibia or metatarsal bone, F 2 68 Geological Society. in its triedral figure, and the flatness of the sides, none of which are longitudinally grooved. It resembles most the humerus of the Al- batross in its form, proportions and size, but it differs in the more marked angles bounding the three sides. The expanded extremity likewise resembles the distal end of the humerus of the Albatross, but it is too mutilated to allow the exact amount of similarity to be determined. On the supposition that this fragment is really a part of the hu- merus, Mr. Owen says, its length and comparative straightness would prove it to have belonged to a longipennate natatorial bird, equalling in size the Albatross. The two other portions of bone have been crushed, but Mr. Owen states that they belong to the distal end of the tibia, the peculiar strongly-marked trochlear extremity of which is well preserved. Their relative size to the preceding bone, supposing that specimen to be part of a humerus, is nearly the same as in the skeleton of tae Albatross. There is no bird now known north of the Equator with which the fossils can be compared. Tortoise.—The remains of the Chelonian Reptile consist of four marginal plates of the carapace, and some small fragments of the expanded ribs. The marginal plates are united by the usual finely- indented sutures, and each is impressed along the middle of its up- per surface with a line corresponding to the margin of the horny plate which originally defended it. The external edge of each plate is slightly emarginated in the middle. These plates are narrower in proportion to their length than in any of the existing marine Che- lonia ; and they deviate still more in the character of their internal articular margin, from the corresponding plates of terrestrial Che- lonia; but they sufficiently agree with the marginal plates of the — carapace of the Emydes, to render it most probable that these cre- taceous remains are referable to that family of Chelonia which live in fresh water or estuaries. Lacertian Saurian.—This fossil belongs to the collection of Sir Philip Egerton ; and it consists of a chain of small vertebree in their natural relative position, with fragments of ribs and portions of an ischium and a pubis. The bodies of the vertebra are united by ball and socket-joints, the socket being on the anterior and the ball on the posterior part of the vertebra; and they are further proved to belong to the Sau- rian class of reptiles by the presence of many long and slender ribs, as well as by the conversion of two vertebra into a sacrum, in con- sequence of the length and strength of their transverse processes. The remains of the ischium and the pubis are connected with the left side of the sacrum, proving incontestably that this reptile had hinder extremities as well developed as in the generality of Sau- rians. Of these extremities, as well as of the anterior and of the head, there are no traces. Mr. Owen then proceeds to determine to which division of Sau- rians, having ball and socket vertebral joints, the fossil should be referred. In the crocodilian or Loricate group, the transverse costi- Geological Society. 69 gerous processes are elongated, and three, four, or five of the verte- bree which precede the sacrum are ribless, and consequently reck- oned as lumbar vertebree: in the lacertian Sauriz there are never more than two lumbar vertebre, and those which have ribs support them on short convex processes or tubercles. In the fossil from the chalk, the ribs are articulated with short processes of the kind just mentioned, resembling tubercles, and they are attached to the sides of the anterior part of all the vertebra, except the one immediately preceding the sacrum. These charac- ters, Mr. Owen says, in conjunction with the slenderness and uni- form length of the ribs, and the degree of convexity in the articular ball of the vertebrze, prove incontestably, that the fossil is part of a Saurian, appertaining to the inferior or lacertian group. The under surface of the vertebrz is smooth, concave in the axis of the spine, and convex transversely. As there are twenty-one costal vertebrz anterior to the sacrum, including the single lumbar, the fossil, Mr. Owen observes, cannot be referred to the genera Stellio, Leiolepis, Basiliscus, Agama, Lyriocephalus, Anolis, or Cha- meéleon, but that a comparison may be instituted between it and the Monitors, Iguanas, and Scinks. Tn conclusion, he states, that in the absence of the cranium, teeth, and extremities, any further approxi- mation of the fossil would be hazardous, and too conjectural to yield any good scientific result. June 10, 1840.—A memoir descriptive of a ‘‘ Series of Coloured Sections of the Cuttings on the Birmingham and Gloucester Rail- way,” by Hugh Edwin Strickland, Esq., F.G.S. The author commences by expressing his regret at the irre- coverable loss, which science has experienced, in full advantage not having been taken of the valuable geological information, which has been exposed by the railway cuttings in different parts of England during the last ten years; and he suggests the propriety of each line of railway being systematically surveyed by a competent ob- server, while the cuttings are in progress. Anxious to contribute towards so desirable an end, Mr. Strickland gladly yielded to a request made to him by Captain Moorsom, the chief engineer of the Birmingham and Gloucester Railway, to un- dertake a geological survey of the line ; and he expresses his obliga- tions to that gentleman and to Captain J. Vetch for the valuable as- sistance they afforded him. The line was originally surveyed by Mr. Burr, when only the trial shafts had been sunk, and before the cuttings were commenced; but Mr. Strickland bears testimony to the accuracy of the account which Mr. Burr laid before this So- ciety.—(Geol. Proceedings, vol. ii. p. 593. The direction of the railway ranges nearly parallel to the strike of the strata, and therefore intersects only the new red sandstone and red marl, the lias, and superficial detritus. New red sandstone and red marl.—The lowest rock exposed be- longs to the new red or bunter sandstone, resting on the anticlinal 70 Geological Society. axis of the Lickey, ten miles south-south-west of Birmingham, and one mile south of the termination of the altered rock, or Lickey Quartz*. The sandstone is there thick-bedded, soft, and red, and dips on the western flank about 5° west-south-west, and on the eastern 5° east-south-east. In Grovely Hill, on the north-east of the Lickey, it passes occasionally into a hard quartzose conglome- — rate with a calcareous paste}; and at Finstal, on the south-west of the Lickey ridge, the upper portion of the sandstone is light-coloured, and contains obscure vegetable impressions, being a prolongation of the stratum, with similar impressions, at Breakback Hill, on the west of Bromsgrove {. On each side of the Lickey, the sandstone is conformably overlaid by red marl, which extends on the north-east to Birmingham$, and on the south-west to Stoke Prior and the neighbourhood of Hadnor, where the railway intersects a ridge of lias. On the north side the marl is there cut off by a fault, but on the south, at Dunhamstead, the following juncture section is exposed :— (a.) Lias clay with contorted beds of lias limestone. (b.) White micaceous sandstone, with numerous speci- mens of a smooth oval bivalve Os aa (c.)eliastettye. 92 USE CARES Si ee (d.) Greyrmar? *) ~F8 200s pep, od Pare iad. aa (e-jihedmmmnmles |... Bash oe ee emse Ig ie SN Dip of the beds 5° north-north-east. In the hill south of Dunhamstead, the grey marl (d) abuts against the red marl (e) in consequence of a fault. For the next five miles the railway traverses a valley of red marl, between the escarpment of the lias and a ridge of Keuper sandstone. On the south-east of Spetchley the strike of that sandstone is altered by a fault from south by east to south-west, and a projecting angle has been pro- duced which is intersected by the railway. ‘This stratum isa feeble representative of the Keuper sandstone of Burg Hill, &c.||, con- sisting chiefly of greenish marl with thin lamine of white sand- stone, about twenty feet thick, with red marl above and below. At Norton the railway ascends the las escarpment, and cuts through a section exactly analogous to the one given above. A mile further south the lias clay contains many calcareous concretions abounding with fossils, including Plagiostoma giganteum, Modiola * See Mr. Murchison’s Silurian System, p. 492. + Similar conglomerates occur in Worcestershire, Staffordshire, and Warwickshire.—Silur. Syst., p.42. Geol. Trans., 2nd Series, vol. v. 347. t Geol. Trans., 2nd Series, vol. v. p. 341; Proceedings, vol. ii. p. 564. § The red marl extends from Birmingham along the London railway as far as Berkswell, forming the basin, in which occurs the lias outlier of Knowle south-west of Berkswell. The true boundary of the sandstone and marl in this district has been only recently ascertained; it ranges from Hewell Grange, nearly north, by Cofton Hacket to Northfield, and thence north-east to the south suburbs of Birmingham. || Proceedings; vol. ii. p. 503. Geol. Trans., 2nd Series, vol. v. p. 332. Geological Society. 71 minima, and a coral. At Abbot’s Wood the fissile sandstone at the base of the lias is again exposed, having been brought up by a fault. At Defford and Eckington the lias clay encloses numerous speci- mens of Pachyodon Listeri (Stuchbury), or Unio Listeri of Sowerby, and Ammonites Turneri. At Bredon a higher portion of the lias series was reached, and a different suite of fossils found, the most marked being Pleurotomaria Anglica, Hippopodium ponderosum, Gry- phea incurva, Nautilus striatus, and several species of Ammonites. Between Cheltenham and Gloucester the lias has yielded great abundance of organic remains, a considerable number of which are considered to be new, and with the exception of Hippopodium pondero- sum, Gryphea incurva, and one or two others, they are distinct from the fossils of Bredon Hill; and at Hewlitt’s, east of Cheltenham, the lias near the base of the marlstone presents another series of distinct fossils. The lower lias, therefore, Mr. Strickland observes, affords evidences of at least four well-marked successions of molluscous faunz, in a vertical height of 400 or 500 feet, and unaccompanied by any change in the mineral character of the deposits. SUPERFICIAL DETRITUS.—The author then proceeds to describe the deposits of superficial detritus, and he states, that they entirely con- firm the views which he had previously entertained, respecting the distinction between the ancient terrestrial alluvia in which bones of mammalia occur, and the submarine drift which covers most parts of the island*. . He divides the detritus into fluviatile and marine, and the latter, according to its origin, into local and erratic, and this, according to its composition, into gravel with flints and without flints. Marine erratic gravel without flints}—Commencing his details with the Birmingham end of the line, Mr. Strickland shows, that these accumulations occur extensively on all sides of that town, and at in- tervals along the line of the railway till it approaches the valley of the Avon. Mammalian remains appear to be totally wanting. Chalk flints are so extremely rare in it around Birmingham as to prove that the materials were transported from the north. At Mosely it is upwards of 80 feet thick, and consists of rolled pebbles, rarely exceeding 4 inches in diameter, of various granitic and quartzose rocks and altered sandstones, imbedded in a clean ferru- ginous sand; and a bed of sand 30 feet thick, without pebbles, occurs in the middle of the gravel. Between Cotteridge and Wytch- all is an erratic boulder, or shapeless mass of porphyritic trap, about 5 feet by 4, with the angles slightly rounded. At the Lickey, gravel analogous to that near Birmingham, but with a large pro- portion of slate rocks, attains, on the line of the railway, a height of 387 feet, and at the Lickey Beacon of more than 900 feet. Sugar’s Brook is the next locality noticed by Mr. Strickland, but from that point no gravel occurs for sixteen miles. Near Abbot’s Wood is another extensive deposit of quartzose gravel and ferruginous sand, devoid of flints and resting upon lias. * See Reports of the British Association, vol. vi., Sessional Meetings, p- 61. + Northern drift of Mr. Murchison, Silur, Syst., p. 523. 7S Microscopical Society. Marine erratic gravel with flints.—These accumulations commence immediately south of the Avon. The village of Bredon stands on a platform, seventy feet above the ordinary level of the Avon, com- posed of lias with an uneven surface, and capped with 10 to 15 feet of this gravel. It contains no mammalian remains. Fluviatile gravel.—The only example of this drift, on the line of the railway, occupies the two opposite flanks of the Avon at Defford and Eckington, north of Bredon. At these localities the surface is a tabular platform which does not exceed forty-five feet above the Avon, including a capping of ten feet of gravel precisely similar to the flinty gravel of Bredon, but containing abundance of mammalian remains. ‘They were chiefly found in the cutting north of Ecking- ton, at the lower part of the deposit, and often on the surface of the lias clay ; and are referrible to Llephas primigenius, Hippopotamus major, Bos Urus, and Cervus giganteus ? On the north, or Defford side of the Avon, the remains of Elephas primigenius and Rhinoceros trichorhinus have been obtained. Associated with these bones are numerous freshwater shells, agreeing with those found at Crop- thorne *; the most abundant species being Cyclas amnica and C. cornea. In endeavouring to account for the presence of these re- mains at only one point in the line of the railway, Mr. Strickland states that he can offer no other explanation than that previously proposed by him +, namely, that after the beds of marine gravel had been deposited and laid dry by the elevation of the land, a large river or chain of lakes extended down the valley of the Avon, at a height varying from twenty to fifty feet above its present course ; and that the gravel previously accumulated by marine currents, was remodified by the river, and mixed up with remains of mammalia which tenanted its banks, or of mollusca which inhabited its waters. Local gravel—This species of detritus occurs abundantly at Chel- tenham, and consists exclusively of detritus from the oolites and lias of the vicinity. No bones or terrestrial remains have been found in it; and, therefore, the author assigns to it, in the absence of other evidence, a marine origin. Modern alluvia.—The only deposits of this nature mentioned in the paper, are the peaty accumulations on the banks of the Avon and its tributaries. The memoir was accompanied by a copy of the Railway Section, and of the Tewkesbury branch, and the junction branch from the main line to the London and Birmingham Railway, presented by Capt. Moorsom, but coloured geologically by Mr. Strickland. MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY. Jan. 27, 1841.—Richard Owen, Esq., President, in the Chair. A paper was read by Mr. Bowerbank, “ On the Keratose or Horny Sponges of Commerce.”’ The author, after noticing the labours of Dr. Grant and Dr. Fle- * Silur. Syst., p. 555; and Proceedings, vol. ii. pp. 6 and 95. + Reports of British Association, vol. vi. Sections, p. 64. Microscopical Society. 73 ming, who have described these bodies to be animals which are ** porous, with skeletons consisting of cartilaginous tubes destitute of earthy spicula,” proceeds to state that he was induced to investi- gate this division of the Sponges in consequence of having received from Rupert Kirk, Esq., of Sydney, numerous specimens of Sponges, among which were many exhibiting every appearance of being true Keratose sponges, but which, upon a close examination with a high microscopic power, were discovered to be abundantly furnished with siliceous spicula. ‘The existence of spicula in these specimens led the author to suspect their presence in the keratose sponges of commerce. Upon examining these sponges, there were found to be two well-marked species from the Mediterranean, and a third which is obtained from the West IndiaIslands. ‘The first and commonest species of Mediterranean sponge, is the Spongia officinalis of Lamarck. When examined, before it has been cleaned and bleached by the dealers, with a power of five hundred linear, the fibre from the exte- rior presents the appearance of a smooth, light, amber-coloured thread ; but when taken from the interior it is seen to be coated with a thin and somewhat rugose film, containing minute granules, which the author believes to be the incipient gemmules of the sponge, by which the sponge is propagated, after the manner described by Dr. Grant as occurring in other divisions of this class. The greater part of the fibres consist of cylindrical transparent threads, frequently anasto- mosing and varying considerably in their size. ‘This portion of the tissue is destitute of spicula; but there frequently occur, dispersed amid this form of tissue, large flattened fibres running in a straight direction, and it is in these that spicula are found imbedded in the centre of the tissue. ‘The spicula vary considerably in their size and form, and are best obtained for examination by burning small pieces of the sponge to a white ash, and washing this with dilute muriatic acid. In the other sponges of commerce, spicula are found in equal abun- dance. All the writers who have treated of Spongia officinalis have described it as consisting of horny tubes ; but the author states this to be an error, and proves the thread in all the species of the sponges of commerce to be a solid horny fibre. The second species of Me- diterranean sponge is described as being very similar in its external characters, and in the size, form and arrangement of its fibres, to S. officinalis, but is distinguished from it by the possession of a beauti- ful vascular tissue, which surrounds in great abundance nearly every fibre of its structure, frequently anastomosing and running in every possible direction over its surface. ‘This tissue is not imbedded in the horny mass of the fibre, but is contained in a sheath, which closely embraces it. In one of these vessels the author observed numerous minute globules, exhibiting every appearance of being globules of circulation analogous to those found in the blood of the higher classes of animals. These molecules were extremely minute, the largest being but the 16,666th of an inch in diameter, and the smallest the 50,000th of an inch in diameter. A similar vascular tissue is stated to exist in a considerable number of the keratose sponges of Au- stralia. The author concludes by some observations on the nature 74 Miscellaneous. and structure of the spicula of sponges in general, and endeavours to prove that they bear no relation to the raphides of vegetable bodies, but are truly of animal origin, having their internal surfaces lined with an animal membrane, which becomes converted into a thin film of carbon when the spicula are exposed to the action of the blow-pipe. The author illustrated his paper by numerous drawings of the tis- sues described, and exhibited the specimens from which they were delineated. Mr. Owen exhibited the specimens of the teeth of the Labyrintho- don, described by him at the last Meeting of the Geological Society, and he explained the peculiarities of the dental structure in that extinct species of Reptiles. Mr. Varley called the attention of the Society to a new form of Microscope, which he had constructed with a view to facilitate the examination of minute living objects. MISCELLANEOUS. Absorption of Liquid Solutions by the Sap-vessels of Plants.—M. Dumas reported to the Academy of Sciences on the 30th November, 1840, that by the absorption of various fluids, Dr. Boucherie had dis- covered a method of rendering wood more durable, of increasing its tenacity and hardness without impairing its elasticity, and of im- parting to it various permanent colours and odours. Dr. Boucherie found that the attractive power of the vegetable tissue was sufficient to carry from the base of the trunk to the leaves all the fluids he wished to introduce, provided they were kept within certain limits of concentration. He cut a tree near the base when in full sap, and plunged it into a tub containing the fluid he wished to introduce, and in a few days he found that it had risen even to the most elevated leaves, and had penetrated all the tissue except the heart of the tree. The same result followed whether the trunk was in an erect or inclined position. It was not even necessary to divide the trunk completely, for a cavity hollowed out at its base, or a groove made with a saw over a considerable part of the circumfe- rence, was sufficient, when the cut part was brought into contact with the fluid, to allow a rapid absorption to take place. Dr. Boucherie ascertained that the absorption of a solution of pyrolignite of iron containing some creosote augmented the hard- ness of wood and prevented its decay, while the penetration of the wood with solutions of the earthy chlorides and various saline mat- ters rendered it less combustible. Various colours were given to wood by causing different substances to be absorbed in succession. Pyrolignite of iron by itself gave the wood a beautiful brown colour; when it was followed by an astringent fluid containing tannin, a blue, black, or gray colour ensued ; and when succeeded by ferrocyanate of potash, a deep Prussian blue re- Miscellaneous. 75 sulted. In the same way the absorption of acetate of lead and of chromate of potass imparted a yellow colour, and by the mixture of several of these substances a still greater variety of shades was pro- duced. Different odours were in a similar manner given to various kinds of wood. The Highland Society of Scotland have offered a gold medal or thirty sovereigns as a premium for the best account of a series of similar experiments. Congres Scientifique de France.—The Ninth Meeting of this Asso- ciation, which in its plan and objects resembles the British Associa- tion for the Advancement of Science, will be held at Lyons, and will occupy twelve days. The Session will open on Wednesday, Sep- tember Ist, 1841, in the great hall of the Palais des Terreaux. The Association will be particularly gratified by the attendance of men attached to science, literature and the arts, from the British Isles. Eels killed by the late Frost.— Although it is well known to natural- ists that the Eel, otherwise tenacious of life, cannot bear excessive cold, I conceive that the following facts upon the subject, though by no means so satisfactory as could be wished, are worthy of being placed on record. On the 6th, 7th, and 8th of the present month (Febru- ary, 1841) great quantities of this fish in a dead state floated down the river Lagan to the quays at Belfast. Here upon these days, and along the course of the river within the tide-way, collecting dead eels was quite an occupation at low water, and to the numerous loiterers about the quays proved in some cases more productive for the time than the “‘chance jobs” by which they gain a livelihood. One individual earned his two shillings for nearly a bushel-full*, and another, selling them at the same rate, gained five shillings for what he collected at the fall of a tide. Three examples sent me by my friend Edmund Getty, Esq., were the common Eel (Anguilla acuti- rostris, Yarr.), in excellent condition, and in all respects of ordinary appearance; one was about a foot, the others were two feet in length. They were found dead of all sizes up to the largest. The only experiment I heard of being made on these Eels was, that four of them, of gradations in size from a foot to two feet in length, were placed in water warmed to a high summer tempera- ture, to see if they would revive; but, as may be anticipated of such a proceeding, none of them exhibited any signs of life. A highly interesting fact connected with this fatality among the Eels is, that on the three days on which they perished from the cold, the ther- mometer was nearly ten degrees higher than it had been for three days successively in the preceding month, when none were known to have suffered from it. At that time the wind was south-west and moderate. When they were killed there was a gale from the east, accompanied by hard frost: to the human body the cold was at this * The price of Eels in our market is three-pence or four-pence per pound. 76 Miscellaneous. time extreme and piercing, though at the period mentioned in January it was not disagreeable. At low water a great extent of mud- banks is uncovered at the part of the river where the Eels were killed, and at this season these fishes are believed to be imbedded in the mud; they would seem to have suffered from the intense cold arising from the rapid evaporation produced by the piercing east wind. Since January 1814, such a sensation of extreme cold has not been experienced at Belfast, and at that time, as I am informed by Mr. Hyndman, great quantities of Eels met with a similar fate in the river Lagan. They were seen by him floating down the stream dead, at the Long Bridge in this town. It is most probably in reference to 1814 that Mr. Templeton has remarked in his ‘ Catalogue of Irish Vertebrate Animals,’ that ‘‘ great numbers of eels inhabiting the shallow watery mud on the shore of Belfast Lough were killed during a severe winter*.” It is worthy of remark, that at the time just mentioned the wind was also easterly. In the Meteorological Report for January 1814, published in the ‘ Belfast Magazine,’ it is ob- served, ‘‘ The continuance of the wind in the east for a longer time than usual has produced such a degree of cold as the oldest person in Ireland now alive cannot remember. Notwithstanding the rise of the tide, a sheet of ice has covered the bay of Belfast, strong enough to enable people to walk about with perfect safety over the channel, and full half a mile from the quays. Lough Neagh has also been so much frozen as to allow people on horseback to ride into Ram’s Island, situated two miles from the shore.” I have been credibly in- formed that at the same period laden carts were taken over the ice to the island, and that some sportsmen of the neighbourhood hada drag or trail hunt upon the lake, and followed the hounds on horseback. A lighter, when coming to Belfast on the 6th or 7th of the present month, on breaking the ice at a part of the river where the banks ‘are not uncovered to the same extent at low water as where the eels were chiefly killed, exposed a number of them, which, though not dead, were so weak as to be unable to offer any resistance, and were lifted into the vessel. On the days which proved fatal to the eels here great numbers were likewise found dead in the bay at Dun- dalk. The minimum thermometer at the Belfast Library indicated on the morning of aay, x Noe sabe Wind south-west; mode- 9, J ite50) ot: Ht el February 6, pg ._~ (Wind very high from the oe ds Ais DIO t= da eT B 0727 Sp) a ere Wa. THomeson. Donegal Square, Belfast, Feb. 1841. * Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. i. New series. Miscellaneous. 77 OBITUARY :—FRANCIS BAUER, ESQ. Mr. Bauer was born at Feldsberg, in Austria, on the 4th of Octo- ber, 1758, and died at Kew on the 11th of December, 1840. He lost his father (himself an artist) at an early age, and was initiated, with his brothers, in the ready use of the pencil, under the guidance of an excellent mother. He came to England in the year 1788, with the intention to proceed to Paris, where, notwithstanding the pro- gress of the Revolution, artists and scientific men were allowed to follow their pursuits without molestation. His brother Ferdinand, scarcely less skilful in the art of delineating botanical subjects, and who subsequently accompanied Mr. Robert Brown as draughtsman on Flinders’s voyage, had already been with Sibthorpe in Greece, and was then at Oxford, busy in completing the ‘Flora Greca.’ Sir Joseph Banks soon appreciated Mr. Bauer’s rare talents, as well as his singu- lar sagacity in botanical physiology, and prevailed on him to remain in England. Sir Joseph, in fact, settled on him 300/. per annum for life, on condition that he should reside at Kew, as botanical painter to the Royal Gardens, which were then rapidly advancing to a high state of perfection. The munificence of Sir Joseph enabled Mr. Bauer to pursue the bent of his genius independent of the public and of booksellers; and numberless beautiful illustrations of the rare plants introduced in rapid succession at Kew, by the many travellers and navigators of the reign of George the Third, were the result— works now deposited with Sir Joseph Banks’s library at the British Museum, and which all who have examined must acknowledge to be, for accuracy of delineation and colouring, elegance of execution, as well as for physiological and anatomical truth, unexampled at that period. Mr. Bauer was also appointed drawing-master to the Princess Elizabeth ; but he was a better philosopher than courtier, and his services, which were given gratuitously, were soon dispensed with. At that time he was occupied on the Heath tribe, then in course of introduction, chiefly from the Cape, by Menzies. Engravings were made from these drawings, and Queen Charlotte and the Princess used to colour them under his superintendence. These were after- wards sold by public auction, with other of Her Majesty’s effects! Towards the end of the last century, Mr. Bauer commenced his illustrations of Orchideous plants, since published by Dr. Lindley. He subsequently turned his attention to the diseases in corn, in which, from his skill in the use of the microscope, he made discoveries of great importance to agriculture, and therefore to mankind; and we may here state, that the only money which he received during his long life, beyond the above-mentioned income, was fifteen guineas, which the editor of one of the cheap publications of the present day sent to him for some short papers on the smpt in wheat. In 1816, the late Sir Everard Home, being engaged in some re- searches respecting the anatomical structure of the foot of the com- mon house-fly, communicated the difficulties he experienced to Sir Joseph Banks, who immediately introduced him to Mr. Bauer. This led to an intimacy of the most lasting and most useful kind. Mr, Bauer solved every difficulty, and, at the suggestion of Sir Everard, entered on a number of other anatomical inquiries, the results of which 78 Miscellaneous. were published by Sir Everard in the Transactions of the Royal So- ciety. The most remarkable of these were his dissections and draw- ings of the common red earthworm, the lampreys, conger-eel, Mexi- can Proteus, metamorphosis of the tadpole, generations of oysters and muscles, process of incubation from the egg to the perfect chicken, the eye, structure of brain, nerves, blood, lungs, urethra, and muscular fibre—some of which labours have led to great improve- ments in the treatment of diseases, and consequent alleviation of hu- man suffering; and all display an unrivalled degree of skill, perse- verance, and philosophical acumen, sufficient to have conferred on him the highest fame, had such been his aim. At the suggestion of Sir Everard Home, George the Fourth resolved to establish a Bota- nical Museum at Kew, which was to be entrusted to Mr. Bauer. The house now belonging to the King of Hanover was purchased for this purpose—the shelves were prepared—all the botanical books in the King’s library were to be removed there, and some had, in fact, been sent down, when, unfortunately, a dispute arose respecting the land, to which the Commission of Woods and Forests laid claim; and some artillery waggons driving off with the book-cases gave Mr. Bauer the first intimation that the plan had been abandoned. About this period Mr. Bauer made his superb drawings of the Rafflesia Arnoldii (the plant of which a model in wax is preserved at the rooms of the Horticultural Society). He still continued his de- lineations of Kew plants, and latterly, more especially of the ferns published by Sir William Hooker. He, at the same time, directed his attention to many microscopical researches—such as the struc- ture of cotton, flax, and wool, the hairs of the various races of men, as well as of many animals, the red snow of Sir John Ross; and, though little known to the public, he had so well established his re- putation amongst the select in every walk of science, that rarely in- deed would any man of science or any traveller of eminence pass through London without visiting him, and no one returned otherwise than gratified and instructed. Of Mr. Bauer, indeed, it has been truly said, ‘‘that nothing prevented his acquiring an extraordinary degree of fame, except his remarkably unobtrusive modesty—he worked rather for the credit of others than for his own.” Mr. Bauer continued, up to a late period, his microscopic researches and drawings; but, unwilling to risk the chance of leaving any work unfinished, he at last determined to rest, and to attempt no more. Seated near his microscope, which long use had made almost essen- tial to his happiness, he spent his hours in re-examining what his pencil had so admirably perpetuated, and reviewed, in the monuments of his labour, the history of his life. His was, indeed, a life of in- cessant activity and usefulness. The motives which stimulate com- mon men never influenced him! Vanity, selfishness and illiberality were wholly foreign to his disposition; and that his innocent labours had spared him from all self-reproach and remorse, his serenity, his cheerful resolve to abide his time in peace, and his final departure from this world under circumstances the most consolatory, full of resignation, faith and hope, and free from sufferings, save the in- creasing debilities of old age, sufficiently prove.—Atheneum, No. 687. Meteorological Observations. 19 To the Editors of the Annals and Magazine of Natural History. GENTLEMEN, In the Cambridge Anatomical Museum there are two skeletons of Seals, which possess the characters of the Halicherus Gryphus, given in Bell’s ‘ British Quadrupeds.’ One of them was formerly in the Museum of Dr. Macartney at Dublin, and was probably taken off the eastern coast of Ireland; the other, of large size, and of ad- vanced age, if we may judge from the state of its teeth, was cap- tured in fishing nets off the Essex coast, a few years ago. I have the honour to be, gentlemen, Your obedient servant, Caius College, Cambridge, Feb. 8, 1841. L. E. Pacer. METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS FOR JAN. 1841. Chiswick—Jan. 1. Hazy: fine with clouds. 2. Rain: clear and fine: hurri- canes at night. 3. Thunder-storm about 7 a.m., accompanied with large and vivid flashes of lightning, rain, hail and sleet, and high wind, which soon after subsided into a perfectcalm. 4. Sharp frost : slight fall of snow : clear at night. 5. Densely overcast : snow: large lunar halo in theevening. 6. Hazy. 7. In- tense frost. 8. Dense fog: severe frost. 9. Intense frost. 10. Overcast : slight haze: rain at night. 11. Overcast. 12. Cloudy: clear. 13. Foggy: rain: fall of snow. 14. Cold haze: rain: sleetand snow. 15. Rain. 16. Thawing rapidly: occasioning inundations, the frozen crust preventing the water from sinking into the earth. 17. Continued thaw. 18. Rain. 19. Overcast. 20. Cloudy and cold: sharp frost at night. 21. Frosty: fine. 22. Frosty: rain at night. 23. Clear. 24. Boisterous: cold and dry. 25. Clear and frosty. 26. Overcast and fine. 27. Veryfine. 28. Cloudy. 29. Fine. 30. Hazy. 31. Foggy: rain. Previously to the thaw, in the beginning of the month, the frost had penetrated in some soils to a depth of 12 inches. Boston.—Jan. 1. Cloudy. 2. Fine. 3. Cloudy: stormy with lightning and rain early a.m. 4. Cloudy: snow early a.m. : stormy with rain p.m. 5. Stormy. 6,7. Fine. 8. Fine: thermometer 179-0 three o’clock p.m. 9. Fine: therme- meter 28°-0 three o’clock p.m. 10. Cloudy: large fall of snow early a.m. 11. Cloudy : snow early a.m. 12. Cloudy. 13. Fine: rainrp.m.e 14, 15. Cloudy. 16. Cloudy : snow early a.m.: rain r.m. 17. Fine. 18. Cloudy. 19. Cloudy: rain early am. 20. Snow: snowr.M. 21. Cloudy: snow early a.m. 22, 23. Fine. 24. Stormy: heavy snow-stormr.m. 25, 26. Fine. 27. Fine: beautiful morning. 28. Cloudy. 29. Fine. 350. Cloudy. 31. Rain: rain early a.m.: snow-storm p.m. N.B. The 8th of this month was the coldest day since Jan. 1, 1820, Applegarth Manse, Dumfries-shire—Jan. 1. Slight showers. 2. Slight show- ers: frost inthe morning. 3g. Snow-storm. 4. Snow-storm and frost. 5. Snow- storm. 6. Fair: snow lying. 7. Snow-fall: frost very keen. 8. Snow-fall slightly: frost keen. 9. Thaw, with slight snow. 10. Snow and frost again. 1J. Fair: snow lying: thawr.m. 12. Fair: but freezing hard. 13, Fair: freezing. 14,15. Fair. 16. Storm of snow, sleet and rain. 17. Thaw: heavy rain p.M. 18. Frost again: clear. 19. Frostagain. 20. Frost again: Aurora borealis. 21. Thaw: drizzling rain. 22. Wet and boisterous. 23. Wet and boisterous: slight snow-fall. 24. Fair: frosty: slight snow-fall. 25. Frost a.m.: drizzle p.m. 26. Thaw and thickfog. 27. Shower in afternoon. 28. Fair and fine: snow melting. 29. Drizzling. 30. Thick fog all day. 31. Clear and cold: moist P.m. Sun shone out 25 days. Rain fell 10 days. Snow 8 days. Frost 16 days. Fog 2. Wind north 2 days. North-east 5} days. East 2 days. LEast-south-east 33 days. South-east 1£ day. South-west 4 days. West-south-west 1 day. West 4 days. West-north-west 23 days. North-west 3 days. North-north-west 2 days. Calm 8 days. Moderate & days. Brisk 3 days. Strong breeze 7 days. Boisterous 4 days. Stormy 1 day. | YOO"O ‘ava 26:0 | GS-1} 09-2] ‘wing L-92|0-LE\L.2E 19-82 /06-6€ L-Z€ | €-0F | €-SE | LP9.6Z| S£9-62) PP-6% | 10L:6% | £18.62 ggl-6z “Uz I gf | |9% | a1. | 390. |tasax|unjeo| *# 's | PE| th) 6€| 8G | ah |2-0F| L-1V|8-0P| SE-0F | 02-0€ | 28-62 | $91-0€ | C61-0€ | o1z-08 | “1 Ae ea eeaea| he a Ovals? *s jureo} *M | *s lige |fer| Le| LE | ob |6-LE|Z-FV |-0F | €1-0€ | 80-0 | 06-62 | Z1Z-0€ | 1SZ-0£ | zgz-0f | ‘of C fish Meforay ll °O2al Fatayel) eb ‘m |e] ‘NX | ‘mn | IP IFSP (S.9€) ZE | oF |0.9€|8-FH|L-LE} 11-0€ | O1-0€ | 08-62 | 9L1-0€ | 802-08 | zoz-0£ | “6% 9f Sareea | paces ieere's se [emu joupeo} “MH | ems | LEECH] Ih] 8% | PP 10-921 8:29 /8-LE| PI-O€ | 21-08 | €8-6z | 0S5-0€ | OO£-08 | zZE.0€ | °gz CO) Peabo irra Cr a "wm [uupeo| “44 | smss | gE) 8} LP} PE | ES | 0-€F | 9-87 /€-LV| 26-62 | LL-6z | 89-62 | S10-0€ | S2Z-0€ | 0S0-08 | Lz Ge jc ff tte Pott | sas furyea] MS | emsm | OF] OV] ge) EF | 6h | 0-10] 9-€V|L:ZP | 04-62 | 0L-62 | 69-62 | 886-62 | 000-0£ | 000-08 | *9% 1€ |‘ |ST- | 10. | €£0. | sms juyea| “| sms [f1z] SE\G-gz) ZE | OF |0-TE| 0-8E |S-1€| 88-62 | O1-0€ | 00-0€ | $61-0€ | 9EE-0€ | OSE.0€ | “Sz ce yee tae] ot | tw | oN | UN | emu [79G] PE! PE} 9% | SE |0-9€| 0-2P|L-9€| €1-08 | LL-6z | 17-62 | 964-62 | 191-08 | 964-62 | “FZ LE jor | | tee | COL. [tuna] x |*MN | mn | TE) BE] OF] ZE | Cp | €-PE| LHP | €-68 | S2-62 | $g-6z | $9.62 | 100-08 | 801-0€ | F80.08 | *€% ve (Ge.3 | |Ol. | "* | ms jure) “MS | +s 1TGe) ab) Of) ZE | Ph | Z-0f| F-6E |S-PE | 01-62 | L6-62 | 96-62 | LST-0£ | CO£-0€ | 96£.08 | “7a@ Az) \eset [etaeeli see ive "MN jurjva| "MN | -m |F€z%| 68] 6z| SZ | BE | P-82| L:PE|8.62 | 0Z-0F | 6T-0€ | 00-0€ | PLE-0€ | G0S-0€ | O1P.0€ | *1z Be ft fe | BZ. | oN | CN | CN | cmN | €% FGE] O€| BZ | PE |9.28| GLE |E-VE| VI-O€ | €0.0€ | £2.62 | 610-08 | Z8I-0£ | OG0.0€ | “0% LE | ss |GO- | Zo. | LoS |*MNN jwyeo! “"N | emnn | 7Z| PE} SE} 8% | OF |0-GE| Lev |S-SE| 16-62 | 08-6z | SP-6z | 8LL-62 | 816-62 | Z18.63 | *61 ap tee | lpm | oc “x |uyeo| ‘aA : HE | Se G-Ep| Cf | Lb | L-9V| €-29 |8-9P | OL-6z | Z9-6z | 62.6% | $89-6% | SZL-6% | £2.66 | “SI TH | tt | 8E | Zo. | OOT- [msm junpes| “MS | sas [fce Toh] oh) SF | a¢ |0-LE| 8-19 | PLP | PE-6% | 81-62 | 02-62 | $09.62 | 622-62 | ZE9.6% | “LT go je | lop. | ggo. | e Satan “* | “yorMsty) | 00g “oY ? UOpuOT | ‘aatys-sonyundg a *yormstyo + uopuo'y "yao : — ae a 2 eee ee See * ie Se ee ee re TOSAT GT 59 GT “*ureyy “PULL *JOJOWOULLIYT, “1aJOWIOIV DOP tote pu Li Ws OOO Ee Oa 9 CORSO dsee 5 MOT COTA Wine 1) ee Onsen JAN, COTATI on SEPT) OA GIOIA CE EY er ChE rainy ar eYe1 tha Ea AN NALS AND MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. No. 42. APRIL 1841. X.—Contributions to British Actinology. By Enwarp Forses, M.W.S., For. Sec. B.S., &c. I. On Kapnea, a new Helianthoid Polype*. In August 1840, I dredged on the east coast of the Isle of Man, about a mile from Douglas Head, a very remarkable and beautiful Zoophyte, of the family Actiniade. It came from a depth of 18 fathoms, and the sea-bottom at the place where it was taken is chiefly Millepora. To a fragment of that coral it was adhering by its expanded base, and when taken its tentacula were retracted. The body presented the appearance of a lengthened cylinder arising from a broad- spreading inflated base, and terminating in a round tentacu- liferous disc, in the centre of which is a circular mouth. The tentacula are very short, and have the aspect of squared tu- bercles. They are arranged in three circles, sixteen in each circle, those of the outermost or marginal row largest. Below the tentacula and surrounding the disc is a granulated caly- cine circle or belt ; and a Jittie below it, extending downwards over a portion of the base, the body is invested by a woolly, brown epidermis, which is eight-cleft or lobed at its upper part. The base is somewhat lobed, and usually swelled out with sea-water. The body and base are of a vivid vermilion colour, the latter with darker longitudinal stripes. The ten- tacula are somewhat paler and inclined to orange. They can be drawn within the body, the upper part of which can be retracted as low as the commencement of the epidermis. When fully expanded, this animal was an inch in height by one-fourth of an inch broad at the disc. It is rather an ac- tive creature, changing its form often, but always presenting more or less of a tubular shape, like a chimney-crock or steam- boat funnel. The shape of the tentacula and the presence of a regular epidermis are the most remarkable features of this Actinea, * Communicated to the Wernerian Society, January 23, 1841. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vu. 82 Mr. E. Forbes’s Contributions and distinguish it at once from all itstribe. Its general form and calycine rim approach to the Actinea bellis and some other species appertaining to the genus Actinocereus of Blainville. The epidermis and the imperforate tentacula separate it from Ehrenberg’s restricted genus Actinea, and the absence of dermal pores from his Cribrina; neither of which divisions, as defined by that naturalist, I am inclined to admit, and therein agree with my friend Dr. Johnston. It is more nearly re- lated to the Zoanthide than any known species of its family, and presents a most interesting transition from the typical Actiniade to that tribe. The regular form of the singular epidermis would lead us to consider that appendage as an im- perfect tube, and some curious analogies might result from such a view. Both the number of the tentacula and of the clefts or lobes of the epidermis being multiples of four, is im- portant, as supporting the notion that four is the typical or dominant number of the Actiniade, perhaps of all Zoophytes. On account of the above characters, I have thought it right to constitute a separate genus for its reception under the name of Capnea (from carvn, a chimney), and define it thus: Body cylindric, invested in part by a lobed epidermis, and adhering by a broad base. Tentacula simple, very short, re- tractile, surrounding the mouth in concentric series. Sp. Capnea sanguinea, Forbes. Tentacula arranged in three series, sixteen in each. Body and dise scarlet. Epidermis brown. Hab. Deep water, Irish Sea; among Millepora. PI.1. fig. Wy cBs105, Cys Il. A British Hippocrene. The genus Hippocrene was constituted by Brandt for a very curious and beautiful little Medusa observed by Martens in Behring’s Straits, and which had been previously described by Lesson, who had it from the Malanine Isles, under the name of Cyanea Bugainvillii. Lesson afterwards re-named it Bugainvillia macloviana, but Brandt’s generic name takes precedence by right of priority. The generic character de- pends on the production of the mouth into a sort of trunk, which has wing-like appendages at its sides, and terminates in four branching tentacular arms. From each of the appen- dages runs a canal to the margin, where we find the tentacula collected in fasciculi, and not surrounding the edge, or sepa- rate, as in most allied Medusz. When naturalizing on the north coast of Ireland with Mr. Smith, of Jordan Hill, in 1839, I took a number of Medusze to British Actinology. 83 of this genus by the towing-net, in Ballycastle Bay and at Port Rush, and afterwards, during the same summer, found it on the other side of Britain, at the mouth of the Frith of Forth. My animal is larger, and differs in several particu- lars from that described by Brandt and by Lesson, and I regard it as anew species. In form it is almost globular, and it measures an inch in length. The central cavity is oblongo- quadrate, and occupies about one-half of the globular um- brella. At its summit interiorly are seen four stomachal ap- pendages, placed at right angles to each other so as to form a cross. They are equal in size, of a yellow colour, squared above, rounded below, and oblong. At their lower or oral extremity are seen four slender white arms, which dichoto- mously divide into numerous tentacula with globular tips. These arms are very extensile, but are never sent from out the cavity. From each of the four oral appendages or a/@ runs a translucent canal to one of the four fascicles of the ten- tacula, one of which is seen at each angle of the quadrate cavitary opening. ‘These tentacula are very curious. They are highly contractile, and spring from little arches of a glan- dular appearance and a red colour, which form the bases of the fascicles, and into which the four canals run. On mag- nifying one of these arches, we find it to consist of two parts, one (the upper) red, the lower white, and each of these to consist of a great number of tubercles, which form the roots of the tentacula. On each tubercle is a minute black ocular dot. The tentacula are not all extended at the same time; very often one, two or three only are sent out, but there ap- pear to be more than a dozen pairs of tubercles in each arch. Between the arches the margins of the cavity are straight, and furnished with a semicircular lip or valve. The outer surface of the body is smooth, and the appearance of the creature is that of a crystal bubble, with four red dots round a square opening, and a central yellow nucleus, having branched threads suspended from it. Sars, in his ‘ Beskrivelser,’ &c. has figured and described a minute Medusa under the name of “ Cyt@is ? octopunctata,” which evidently belongs to the same group with the above. The known species of Hippocrene may be summed up as fol- lows :-— H. Bugainvillii, Brandt. (See figure in Petersburgh 'Trans- actions for 1838.) Stomachal appendages as long as the proboscis, eight, the four larger ones oblong, yellow, with red centres. Tentaculiferous glands four, red and yel- low, with pink tentacula. Umbrella in part pilose. North Pacific. G2 84 Mr. E. Forbes’s Contributions H. brittanica, Forbes. Stomachal appendages as long as the proboscis, four, equal, yellow. Tentaculiferous glands four, red and white, with white tentacula. Umbrella smooth. North of Ireland and East of Scotland. H. octopunctata, Sars. (Beskr. og Jagt. p. 28. t. 6. f. 14.) Stomachal appendages shorter than proboscis, four, un- equal. Tentaculiferous glands eight, black. Umbrella smooth. Coast of Norway. Plate I. fig. 2 a, Hippocrene brittanica, of the natural size ; 2 b, its stomachal appendages and oral arms; 2 ¢, a tentacu- liferous gland and tentacula. III. New Species of Thaumantias. The Medusz of this very natural genus, established by Eschscholtz, have a simple stomachal cavity, from which pro- ceed four simple canals; no arms, but a proboscidiform mouth, which cannot be prolonged beyond the general cavity, and a margin surrounded by tentacula, which are usually bulbous at their bases, and are highly extensile. The species of Thaumantias are small animals, and probably numerous in the northern seas. Hitherto they appear to have been mostly confounded under the Medusa hemispherica of Muller, which is a prettily coloured species, already recorded as a native of the British seas. I have never met with an example which I could refer to Muller’s animal, but have found four very well marked species which have hitherto been unrecorded. 1. Thaumantias pileata, nov. sp. Umbrella cap-shaped. Oral peduncle and clubs of the vessels pink. Proboscis four-cleft at the mouth, lobes acute. Eyes large, black and yellow, on the bulbous origins of the twenty tenta- cula. This pretty species, the shape of which resembles that of a Chinese hat, measured about an inch across. The clubs of its vessels are small and narrow. It was taken at Port Rush, on the north coast of Ireland, in June 1839. Pl. I. fig. 3 a & b, Thaumantias pileata; 3c, its oral pe- duncle. 2. Thaumantias Thompsoni, nov. sp. Umbrella hemi- spherical, very convex. Proboscis four-cleft, lobes tri- angular. Clubs of the vessels, proboscis and bases of tentacula yellow. Eyes minute, black, on the triangular bases of the sixteen tentacula. PLI. fig. 4a & 6, Thaumantias Thompsoni; 4 c, one of the tentacula. to British Actinology. 85 Taken abundantly in Clifden Bay, Cunnemara, by Mr. Thompson, Mr. Ball, and myself, in July 1840. nulis supra ungulas albis; linea laterali nigra; pedibus annulo se- Rev. L. Jenyns on British Mammalia. 261 cundo nigro posticé albo super-marginato notatis; apice caudz (brevis et gracilis,) et linea pilorum pauld pendentium infra collum ad pectus tendente, nigris. Habitat apud Tibetam Minorem. Va- rietas dubia minor, cornibus extrorsim gyratis, cum angulo interiori prominentiori. 11. O. Musimon, Linneus. O. cornibus compressis, ad basin tri- quetrioribus, angulo interiori prominentiori; lunatim gyratis, et sulcis transversim indentatis: colore pallido. Magnitudo Arietis parvi, cauda brevi et magis villosa quam in specie precedente : pilis rufo-brunneis; facie livida, cum capistro albo; ventre, clunibus, di- midiisque artuum inferioribus, albis ; et linea laterali, cauda, pectore, et membrorum plerumque dimidiis superioribus, nigris: macula tri- angulari alba utroque lumbo szpe (semper?) conspicua. Habitat apud insulas Corsice et Sardinie, et forsan provinciam Murcie in Hispania. 12. O. Ophion, Blyth. O. Musimoni simillima, sed cornibus retrorsis, apicibus accurvatis: pilisque brunneis, et non rufescenti- bus(?). Habitat apud Cyprum, et forsan regiones alias Levantinas 13. O. Aries, Linnzus. 44 O: ? Ivalus Probaton, Ogilby. Magnitudo Arietum maximorum, cauda paulim elongata : cornibus in specimine solo cog- nito abnormaliter (?) rudimentalibus. Pilis castaneo-fulvis, et infra albescentibus. 15. O. (Ammotragus) Tragelaphus. O. cornibus magnis subqua- drangularibus, moderaté crassis, ad apicem compressioribus, sulcis transversim indentatis; divergentibus et retrorsim curvatis, sed prope basin rectis, apicibus acclinatis; colore pallido. Magnitudo Cervi Dame superior, pilis flavescenti-brunneis ; collo jubato, et infra cum pectore brachisque capillato, cauda elongata extremitate vil- losa ; facie non convexa—ut in omnibus speciebus aliis, sinibusque suborbitalibus nullis. Foemina semper (?) cornuta, cornibusque for- tioribus quam in fceminis specierum ceeterarum hujus generis, que seepe non cornutz sunt, sed plurimz cornua parva, tenuissima, et compressiora ferunt, que in maribus junioribus aut curvata sunt, aut sepe rectiora. Habitat apud Africe Septentrionalis montes rupestre=. EXPLANATION OF PLATE YV. Fig. 1. Ovis Politi; 2. Do. side view ; 3. O. sculptorum; 4. Do. side view ; 5. O. californiana; 6. O. Nahoor; 7. O. Burrhel; 8. O. Gmelini; 9. UO. Vignei. XXXII.—WNotes on some of the smaller British Mammalia, including the Description of a New Species of Arvicola, found in Scotland. By the Rey. Leonarp JENyns, M.A., F.L.S., &c. Tue following notes contain the results of some inquiries and observations respecting our smaller Mammalia, made since the publication of my ‘ Manual,’ and my several papers 262 Rey. L. Jenyns on some of on the British Shrews, etc., in former volumes of this Maga- zine. (1.) Vespertilio Pipistrellus, and V. mystacinus.—M. de Selys-Longchamps has favoured me with continental speci- mens of both these species, which prove identical with ours. I deem the circumstance worth mentioning, because, at the time of publishing my paper in the Linnzan Transactions on the common Bat of this country, it was thought by some persons that the proof of its identity with the Pipistrelle of the Continent, obtained from an actual comparison of speci- mens, was still wanting; and I am not aware of such com- parison having been yet made until now. (2.) Vesperttho Daubentonii—1 am quite aware of the error that I committed in my ‘ Manual, in confounding this species with the V. emarginatus of Geoffroy ; and I have not the slightest doubt of the correctness of Mr. Bell in referring the bat which I described under this last name to the V. Dau- bentonii. (3.) Vespertilio edilis (Ann. of Nat. Hist., vol. ii. p. 73).— MM. Keyserling and Blasius have given it as their opinion, that the bat which I described as new under the above name, is a mere variety of the V. Daubentonii*. 1 myself alluded in my original paper to the possibility of this being the case ; and I have now scarcely any doubt of the fact, as well from what the above authors have stated, more particularly with respect to the incision at the apex of the tragus occasionally varying in the two ears of one and the same individual,—as from the recent examination of a bat, undoubtedly referable to the V. Daubentonii, in which there was a slight approach to the form of tragus observable in the specimen on which I founded the above species. This last bat was taken in Ireland, and was kindly submitted to my examination by Mr. Thomp- son of Belfast. I still think, however, that, though I committed an error, my paper will have been of use in calling the attention of British naturalists to the fact of the tragus occasionally varying in form in this manner, of which I do not apprehend they were generally aware any more than myself. (4.) Martes Foina.—Mr. Bennett and Mr. Bell have both expressed doubts as to whether the common Martin be di- stinct from the Pine Martin+, though the latter gentleman has for the present kept them separate in his ‘ British Quadrupeds.? Mr. Eyton, in a paper recently printed in * See No. 29 of this Journal, p. 149. + See Mr. Bennett’s remarks on this subject in the ‘Gardens and Menagerie of the Zoological Society,’ vol. i. p. 230. the smaller British Mammalia. 263 this Magazine*, seems decidedly inclined to consider them as but one species; and until lately I was myself strongly disposed to embrace the same opinion. In the early part, however, of the summer of 1840, Mr. Henderson, of Milton Park, in Northamptonshire, was kind enough to send me two specimens of the common Martin, killed in that neigh- bourhood, both of which were young animals, and had pro- bably been bred that year, as the milk-teeth had not yet been supplanted by the permanent set, and the bones of the head were very loosely united: nevertheless these individuals had the cranium larger and heavier than that of an adult specimen of the Pine Martin in Mr. Yarrell’s collection, who also showed me several other crania of both species, of different ages, and satisfied me that they were distinct. At the same time it is evident, from the united observations of several naturalists, that the colour of the breast is no distinguishing character, and probably dependent upon either age or season. Mr. Eyton is of opinion that the breast is yellow in the young and white in the adult ; and this would be confirmed by the specimens above alluded to, in both which this part was bright yellow tinged with orange. These individuals were of the same size, and measured 17 inches in length, exclusive of the tail, which was not quite 9. The length of the cranium was 3 inches 4 lines; its breadth across the zygomatic arches 1 inch 10 lines; its weight 4 drachms 38 grains. (5.) Sorex rusticus, and S. Hibernicus.—Since the pub- lication of my paper on the British Shrews+, in which I first noticed the S. rusficus, and the Irish variety which I provisionally termed S. Hibernicus, 1 have been favoured by Mr. W. Thompson of Belfast with the opportunity of exa- mining a large number of specimens of this last kind obtained in Ireland, and am quite satisfied as to its being a distinct species from the S. tetragonurus, but not from the S. rusticus, which | had previously obtained in this country, and of which I have since procured other specimens. In future, therefore, these two species, the S. rusticus and the S. Hibernicus, must be considered as the same; and I should have continued the former name in preference to the latter, as being, on the whole, more eligible, but for the circumstance of several specimens of this shrew having been transmitted to naturalists, abroad as well as at home, under the title of S. Hibernicus, and the probability that, if it be now changed to that of rusticus, it may entail some confusion. I have to request, therefore, that the name Hibernicus be hereafter adopted for this species, which, though not confined to Ireland, seems to be the com- * No. 33, Dec. 1840, p. 290. + Ann. of Nat. Hist., vol. i. p. 417. 264 Rev. L. Jenyns on some of mon species in that country, and much more abundant there than in England, where it gives place in a great measure to the S. tetragonurus. It has also been observed in very dif- ferent localities in Ireland ; and one specimen sent to me by Mr. Thompson was stated to have been taken in the county of Antrim, at an elevation of 1200 feet above the sea. Everything that I have stated in the paper above alluded to, with respect to the characters of the S. rusticus, and the distinguishing marks by which it may be known from the S. tetragonurus, is applicable to the Irish Shrew, excepting as regards the cranium (p. 420); and I must beg, that what I have said on that point be considered as erased, having since ascertained that I was led into an error by the examination of a specimen, the cranium of which did not exhibit its true form from the manner in which it had been prepared. Moreover, it was this error which partly led me to regard the English and Irish specimens of 8. Hibernicus as distinct. In fact, the cranium of the species just named does not differ from that of the S. ¢etragonurus, except in being much smaller. The following are their respective dimensions :— Length. Breadth. Height. lines. lines. lines. Cranium of a middle-sized S. tetragonurus 94 41 28. — ofan old full-grown S. Hibernicus 7% 343 2 The dimensions indeed, generally, of this last species are so much less than those of the former, that it is hardly possible to mistake them, especially if attention be paid to the feet, and also to the tail and attenuation of the snout. Perhaps I have rather over-stated the average dimensions of the S. Hibernicus in my former memoir (called there S. rusticus), when I set them at “ hardly 23 inches ”; but I had not then seen so many individuals. None of those submitted to my examination by Mr. Thompson exceeded 2 inches and 24 lines; and I doubt whether in general the species much exceeds that size. The specimen to which I alluded as being 2 inches and 8 lines, I am now inclined to think must have been a S. ¢etragonurus, which often reaches 3 inches. In respect to the internal structure of these two species, which I have examined and compared, I see no very import- ant differences between them. The stomach is of a very peculiar form in both, having its pyloric portion so extra- ordinarily elongated, that it might easily be mistaken for a portion of the intestine itself. This, indeed, as well as other points in the anatomy of these animals, would deserve further notice, but for the circumstance of M. Duvernoy’s memoir*, * Mém. de la Soc. du Mus. d’Hist. Nat. de Strasbourg, tom. ii. mém, 2. the smaller British Mammalia. 265 so often alluded to in my former papers, in which they have been treated of in detail, and to which 1 must refer those who are interested in the subject. I may, however, make one or two remarks, as supplemental to his. M. Duvernoy states the length of the intestinal canal in the S. tetragonurus, compared with the length of the body, to be as three to one, and rather more. In most of the specimens which I have examined, I have found it nearly as four to one, and in some instances even bearing a higher ratio than this; whilst the ratio of three to one more nearly accords with the case of the S. Hibernicus. The relative, however, as well as the absolute length of the intestinal canal, varies a little in both species, according to the size of the individual. I shall here annex the actual measurement of this, and one or two other parts, such as were observed, first, in a medium- sized specimen of the S. tetragonurus, and then in an old full-grown S. Hibernicus. S. TETRAGONURUS. oe Fae eng d Length of the head and body............seeseseceees gosratene — of the tail ..... eine taaene te loalcbbi a eeesiy ae sec eate : 9 Greatest diameter of the distended stomach ............0+ if Distance from the cardiac orifice to the pylorus, ae 0 the length of the pyloric gut ..........scsseseeeeees Entire length of the intestinal canal, from the naa, 10 9 IMS 2 SNES Gh Ege sags ppecooo sane aosneenano sen spesoceco S. HisErnicus. Length of the head and body inches. lines. Of the tail @ an.ce cas aoorededondaccu Bape ceseiaecannaceee 1 5 Greatest diameter of the distended stomach.............+. 0 5 Distance from the cardiac orifice to the pylorus ......... 0 9 Entire length of intestinal canal, as before The number of ribs, which is not mentioned by Duvernoy, I find to be 14 in both species, of which 7 are true and 7 false. The number of vertebree was also found to be the same in the case of a single individual of each species, and may be estimated as follows :— Cervical mcasdccscasestcwscaeeeeeecacenseeesccces 7 Dorsalucctisiceccssaccacessccccsssenstecesuessces 14 IAT OY Ioaeaereceenccocebe eeeckelectaees sestees 5 Sactaliv pa cavesescnciscastssscsenecseeecemeensos 2 Galil al rseaesases qaacoh wane seoeadeasccsed.seeeice 15 266 Rey. L. Jenyns on some of In a second specimen, however, of the S. fetragonurus the number of caudal vertebrae was as many as 16, whilst in a second of the S. Hibernicus it was only 14; thus showing that in each species it is subject to some variation. In the above table I have estimated the number of sacral vertebrae as 2, according to Duvernoy, who, though he has not given the entire number in the column, has noticed the very peculiar and elongated form of these two, having a sharp ridge on their upper surface, much developed, and common to them both. It is evident, however, on a close inspection, that the first of these two vertebra, which he speaks of as being the most elongated, is resolvable into 4, which are more or less consolidated together, according to the age of the individual. In some instances the lines of separation between them are so distinct, that they might be counted separately ; in which case the entire number of vertebrae in the S. tetragonurus would stand at 47 or 48, and in the S. Hibernicus at 46 or 47. I have deemed it of importance to mention these facts with respect to the vertebra, from the circumstance of M. de Selys-Longchamps having found it a valuable character in distinguishing some closely allied species of Arvicola, and observed to me that he thought it might prove of equal ser- vice in helping to discriminate those of the genus Sorex. It appears, however, from what has been stated, that the exact number in the tail, in this instance, cannot be relied on.‘ (6.) Sorex castaneus (Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. i. p. 43).— I have not been able to obtain any more specimens of this species*, and can therefore say nothing further as to its being really distinct from the S. ¢e¢tragonurus. M. de Selys-Long- champs, who has paid so much attention to this genus, and to whom it was shown during his visit to London in 1839, declined giving any decided opinion about it; at the same time, he observed that he had never seen any individuals of the S. ¢etragonurus of so rufous a tint. I conceive, however, that the fact of a male and female having been found together, the latter of which was big with young when taken, rather tends to support the idea of its being distinct. Also, in- dependently of its colour, and one or two other external peculiarities, there is a slight difference observable in the cranium, as already pointed out in a former papery. * The original specimens were not obtained in my own immediate neigh- bourhood, nor by myself, but in a fen distant some miles from me, and by a person who has since left the district; and I am ignorant of the exact locality in which he met with them. + Ann. N. H., vol. i. p. 424. the smaller British Mammalia. 267 I regret that, when I dissected one of the above specimens, soon after its capture, I did not notice the number of ribs and vertebra, which might have helped to determine the question. This is a point to which attention should be paid by any naturalist who may be fortunate enough to meet with others. The viscera resembled those of the S. te¢ragonurus ; the intestinal canal, however, being relatively a trifle longer than in that species, and measuring 10 inches 4 lines, the length of the body being 2 inches 4+ lines. 1 may just observe, before quitting this species, that the shrew which Mr. Thompson obtained from Ballantrae, and considered as referable to the S. castaneus*, has been kindly submitted to my examination, and proves to be only a pale variety of the S. ¢edragonurus ; and it 1s at his own request that I mention this circumstance. In both my specimens of the Chestnut Shrew, the rufous tint, in the recently killed animal, was quite as bright and decided as in the harvest-mouse or squirrel. (7.) Sorex fodiens.—The peculiar form of stomach noticed above in the case of the S. ¢e¢tragonurus and the S. Hibernicus, is probably to be found in all those shrews having the same type of dentition as those species, and belonging to Duvernoy’s subgenus Amphisorext. In the S. fodiens, which has a di- stinct dental formula, and constitutes the subgenus Hydro- sorex of Duvernoy (Crossopus of Wagler), the stomach is of a somewhat globular form, and without any elongation of the pyloric portion whatever. In a female specimen of this species, 2 inches 11 lines in length, exclusive of the tail, the following internal measure- ments were observed :— inches. lines. Diameter of the distended stomach .........sesesesseses 0 11 Distance from the cardiac orifice to pylorus ..........46 0 35 Length-of, the intestinal. canal ) ...4.2....0ssececedecooneee 15 ) In another female, exactly of the same ‘length, the intestinal canal was found to be only 12 inches 9 lines, showing that this part is subject to considerable variation in respect to extent. Neither in this, nor in any other species of this genus, is there any caecum, or much distinction between the small and great intestines, the diameter of the canal being nearly everywhere the same. The number of ribs in the S. fodiens is 13, 1 less than in the S. tetragonurus ; whereof 7 are true and 6 false. * Charlesworth’s Mag. of Nat. Hist., vol. ili. p. 585. } Supplement to his first memoir, 1833. 268 Rev. L. Jenyns on some of There are 6 lumbar vertebra and 17 caudal, there being 1 more of these last than in any specimen of the S. tetragonurus yet examined; and the entire number of vertebrz will stand at 45 or 48, according as the sacral are reckoned at 2 or 5 as before. This estimate was obtained from an examination of three specimens. (8.) Sorex cilatus—I have seen so many intermediate specimens, in point of colour, between this and the last species, that I consider it extremely doubtful whether they be distinct. Nevertheless, it deserves to be mentioned, that in one very dark-coloured individual of the S. fodiens, and which was sent to me as the S. ciliatus, though it was not quite so uniformly black as my original specimen ofthis latter, or so bulky for its length, I found 18 caudal vertebre, being 1 more than in any of the three individuals of the S. fodiens above-mentioned. This must not be considered as conclusive in favour of the S. céliatus being a species, as we have already seen the number of caudal vertebrze varying by 1, in the case of the S. tetragonurus ; yet it should serve to stimulate to further inquiry. I regret that I have not myself had an opportunity of examining into the value of this character in more specimens. I once thought that there were other anatomical pecu- liarities by which this species might be distinguished from the S. fodiens, to which M. de Selys-Longchamps has made some allusion* ; but having since had reason to suspect that they are not to be relied upon, I forbear dwelling on them. (9.) Mus sylvaticus ?—I1 have two or three times had sub- mitted to my examination specimens of a mouse found on the tops of the Irish mountains, either belonging to this species or very closely allied to it; but those which I have seen have been in too bad condition (merely dried skins) to enable me to decide this point. One of these was taken in the county of Kerry, at an elevation of 2500 feet above the sea-level. The only respects in which they appear to differ from the M. sylvaticus are, in being of a darker colour, smaller, and with some of the relative proportions rather less; but it must be left for those who have an opportunity of examining a large number in the recent state, to say whether there are any real grounds for believing them to be distinct. On the whole, I am inclined to think that they are only a small variety of that species, somewhat modified in its characters from the peculiar locality which they inhabit. (10.) Arvicola amphibius—Not long since I obtained a small Water Vole, which I consider exactly intermediate * Micromammalogie, p. 29. the smaller British Mammalia. 269 between the A. amphibius and the A. ater of MacGillivray. The following is a correct description of the colours : Extreme tip of the snout dusky; cheeks and upper part of the head very deep brown, with a slight reddish tinge, the tips of the hairs being of this colour ; back, from between the ears to the root of the tail, wholly black, the short pile as well as the long hairs being of one uniform tint throughout ; sides very deep brown, slightly tinged with reddish; belly deep ash-grey, with a tinge of reddish like the sides; chin ash-grey, without the reddish tinge, which is deepest just beyond the contour of the chin, and between the fore-legs ; all the feet covered with very short black hairs above, smooth and naked and paler underneath ; tail black, and of one colour throughout. The length of this individual was 5 inches 3 lines, exclusive of the tail, which was 3 inches 3 lines. I have observed, like Mr. MacGillivray*, that the black variety of this species is generally much smaller than the brown. Yet I have known a few instances to the contrary; and one individual, which was the most uniformly deep-coloured one I ever saw, was also the largest. I regret, however, that the note which I made of its exact dimensions has been lost. (11.) Arvicola arvalis.—This species, like the last, appears subject to some variation of character, particularly as regards colour; so much so, as at one time to have led myself, as well as others, to suspect there might be two species confounded under one name. Two individuals which I have had by me in spirits several years, have the feet and tail yellowish, as described by De Selys-Longchampst, the latter being entirely of one colour ; the fur above reddish brown, with the ears appearing out of it; the hair on the under parts of the body rather short and thin, and greyish white, the basal portion of each hair being ash-colour. The larger of these individuals was a female taken in the breeding season, measuring 4 inches 1 line in length, exclusive of the tail, which was 1 inch 3} lines. The upper parts in this specimen were quite as red as in the A. rubidus of De Selys. I have since, at different times, obtained many other in- dividuals, in which the snout, feet and tail were deep ash- grey, approaching to dusky instead of yellowish; the tail also exhibiting an appearance of two colours, as in the A. rubidus and A. subterraneus of the above author. Some of these had the fur as described above; but in others it was * Naturalist’s Library, vol. vii. (Brit. Quad.) p. 264. {+ Micromammalogie, p. 106. 270 Rev. L. Jenyns on some of rather longer, reducing the ears to nearly its own length ; and the hair on the under parts was not only longer and thicker, but darker at the roots, a considerable portion from the base upwards being dusky. Similar to these last described are several individuals in the Museum of the Zoological Society, which, being shown to M. de Selys-Longchamps during his visit to London in 1839, he was at first inclined to think different from the A. arvalis of his work. However, in a subsequent commu- nication by letter to this country, he writes word that he has, since the publication of his ‘ Etudes de Micromammalogie,’ obtained information with respect to the Mus agrestis of Linneus, found in Sweden; and he says that it appears to be the same as his Arvalis, only the colour of the Swedish individuals is rather darker, and the upper part of the tail darker than the under. He then adds, that he had observed a similar local variety in the collection of the Zoological Society, and that he does not think that it is specifically distinct from the common Arvalis. That this opinion is correct I have but little doubt ; and I conceive that the variation in the length and colour of the fur is probably dependent upon season, though the difference of colour in the feet and tail in some specimens can be traced to no particular cause. (12.) Arvicola neglecta, Thompson.—For some time I was inclined to consider also as a mere variety of the A. arvalis some specimens from Scotland, the first of which I received from Mr. Thompson so long back as the spring of 1839. 'To the kindness and liberality, however, of this gentleman I have lately been indebted for permission to examine a much larger number of the same kind of Arvicola collected last autumn at my request, and after a close comparison of both sexes of dif- ferent sizes with English individuals, I am inclined to think that they deserve to rank as a distinct species. I should say that Mr. Thompson had been previously led to form this opi- non, and that it was also the opinion of M. Agassiz, to whom he showed specimens, on the occasion of that naturalist’s visit to Scotland last summer. I have accordingly adopted Mr. Thompson’s own name neglecta for this species, of which he is the discoverer, and which he has merely put into my hands to describe. Mr. Thompson informs me that this new Arvicola is com- mon on moors in two localities in the district around Megar- nie Castle in Perthshire, where he first observed it himself, whilst shooting, in 1829. He has also received it from some sporting friends at Aberarder in Inverness-shire. At this last the smaller British Mammalia. 271 place it was taken in traps set for vermin on broken rocky ground at the base of the glens: it was also caught by the dogs, and knocked on the head by the shooters, in the heathy tracts up to the summits of the mountains; and he adds, which is worthy of remark, that, from want of speed, it was much more easily killed than the common mouse or rat. The most striking peculiarity in this new species is its large size compared with that of the A. arvalis. Both males and females occur measuring five inches in the body without the tail; and it is said that they are sometimes met with five and a half inches long, or even exceeding this. The following are the relative proportions of a male specimen of medium size, according to Mr. Thompson :— Inv) line EV CAGSARG DORN neaccsisie poe npleas ss sisensesins cls seca so 1.0 0 hailitovendyotbones, Secaccessporccace vec ee ceen aa el 3 Manletoxenduotahairg verse censaepsccercunetene ces 1 6 Head ge ccstseecteswosuatene assets Bay Seaeoeencuesaes 3 1 Ts HANS Ase ies vO5s wae weans aclhiepicecsisanatun derieorses 0 5 AWUNISKETS! Miwiccinniiccse seams wes aciewcananeaioteenens eee 0) Moret OG bras aocaek tecdsaceesaaueeeteostnseseniveats 0 54 Faatd=fOOt: scan ccccs cascecesscsh ese seneeammoewerecees One A female of the same size preserved the same relative mea- surements, excepting that the hind foot was shorter by half aline. I observe, amongst the specimens he has sent myself, that the males have generally the feet and tail somewhat larger and stouter than the females. The same thing, how- ever, occurs to a less degree in the A. arvalis. As regards external form, including the characters of the snout, eyes, ears, feet, toes, and tubercles on the soles, it is similar to the common species. In each also there is the same number of mamme, four pectoral and four inguinal*, The general colour of the upper parts is also the same ; but the fur is everywhere considerably longer, so as to cause the ears to be entirely concealed ; and its greater length, as well as the greater quantity of it, is especially obvious on the under parts, where it is also darker at the roots, and of a rather purer white at the tips of the hairs. Some specimens are more rufous above than others ; but the brightness of the tint appears to have no constant connexion with the sex or size of the individual. The colour of the feet and tail, in all cases, is dusky ; the latter somewhat darker above than below, as in the * This is of importance to be noted, since in the 4. subterraneus of De Selys, a closely allied species found in Belgium and France, and possibly to be met with in this country, the number of mamme is only sia, all of which are inguinal. 272 _ Rev. L. Jenyns on some of dark-coloured variety of the A. arvalis noticed under the head of that species. With a view to inquire still further into the characters of the A. neglecta, by permission of Mr. Thompson I dissected several specimens, and compared their internal structure with that of the A. arvalis; but, excepting in the cranium to be hereafter noticed, no very obvious differences presented them- selves. There are a few points, however, in relation to this subject, which may be worth stating. The length of the intestinal canal, as well as the relative length of its different portions, both in the A. neglecta and the A. arvalis, varies much in different individuals, and even in individuals of the same size and sex. Mr. Yarrell* and Mr. MacGillivray+ have both given measurements of these parts in the A. arvalis, which are very different from each other, but which, as the latter gentleman has not mentioned the size of the individual from which they were taken, do not admit of direct comparison. I shall annex the results which I obtained in three different instances of the A. neglecta, and one of the A. arvalis. No; 1: No. 2. No. 3. No. 4. in. lin. ites in. lin. in.) Lins Small intestines ... 13 3 145, 9 9-9 LOe) £3 Cecuim sereasseteee ase 6... -0 7 9 4 0 3 9 Large intestines ... 12 6 15040 Die ene No. 1. was a male neglecta, measuring four inches in length, exclusively of the tail. No 2. was a female of the same spe- cies, and exactly of the same size. No. 3. was a young male of the same species, measuring three inches. No. 4. was a male arvalis, exactly of the same size as No. 3. It will be ob- served, that Nos. 3. and 4, which are different species, do not differ more in this respect than Nos. 1. and 2, which are sexes of the same. Another part which J found varying in different individuals was the gall-bladder. It is observed in anatomical works that this organ is found wanting in many of the Rodentia, parti- cularly among the Rats {. Mr. Yarrell observes, that both the field and bank Campagnol are equally devoid of it. If it be really the fact, that it is never present in the former of these two species, this circumstance will tend to the confirmation of the A. neglecta being distinct, in which I have observed it in the only three cases I have examined, though of such dif- ferent degree of development as to lead to the suspicion that * Lond. Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. v. p. 600. + Brit. Quad., p. 267. t Blum. Man. Comp. Anat., by Lawr. (2nd edit.), p. 128. the smaller British Mammalia. 273 it may sometimes be wanting here also. In one individual it was of considerable size, attaining to the margin of the liver; in a second it was less ; in a third it was very small, but still obvious. I have not observed it, any more than Mr. Yarrell, in the true A. arvalis. The A. neglecta and the A. arvalis agree in the number of vertebrae. M. de Selys-Longchamps has given the entire number in the latter as forty-six, which accords with the num- ber given by Mr. Yarrell, as well as with that observed by myself in several individuals of each of the above species, un- less a very minute rudimentary one at the extremity of the tail be included, in which case the entire number must be set at forty-seven. In one instance, however, of the A. neglecta, a female, I found an additional caudal vertebra, making the entire number forty-seven without the rudimentary one. This affords another proof of the caution that is required in draw- ing any conclusion as to the number of vertebrz from the ex- amination of single specimens. The number of ribs was in all cases the same for both spe- cies, seven true and six false ; being also the number given to the A. arvalis by De Selys. The only part of importance remaining to be mentioned is the cranium. I have examined that of three individuals of the A. neglecta, and, though in general form the same, I find it decidedly larger, broader across the zygomatic arches, and with the bones of the zygoma itself stronger, than that of the arvalis, comparing two individuals of the same size in other respects. In the adult animal, the strength and bend of the zygomatic bones become very considerable, indicating great muscular powers in biting and masticating its food. The fol- lowing are the relative measurements of the crania of a large and small A. neglecta, and also of that of the A. arvalis for comparison. — No. 1. No.2. No. 3. in. lin, lin. lin. Entire length .........-:s0sseseee 1K 11 103 Breadth across zyg. arches ....... 0 7 barely. 6 exceeding, 53 Breadth behind the zyg. arches 0 5} 4s 48 No. 1. is that of an individual of the A. neglecta, measuring four inches in length, tail excluded. No. 2. is that of another individual of the same species, measuring three inches. No.3. is that of an individual of the A. arvalis, exactly of the same size as the last. Having entered above, in some detail, into the characters of the A. neglecta, and the grounds on which I venture to confirm Mr. Thompson’s opinion, as to its being distinct from Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. i 274 Rey. L. Jenyns on some of the A. arvalis, it may be useful just to place side by side the essential differences between these two species, which after all are not very great, and on the true value of which I do not pretend to speak positively. A. arvalis.—Body 4 inches: ears projecting out of the fur : colour of the fur above reddish brown ; beneath greyish white, the hair sometimes dusky at the roots. A. neglecta.—Body 5 or 53 inches: fur long, entirely con- cealing the ears: colour of the fur above reddish brown, beneath whitish, with a large portion of the hair from the root upwards dusky. To these differences may be added the absence of a gall- bladder in the A. arvalis, and its presence in the A. neglecta, if further observation prove the constancy of this character ; also the differences in the cranium above pointed out. (13.) Arvicola rubidus, De Selys? (A. riparia, Yarr.)—I cannot but feel some doubts as to the identity of the A. ri- paria of Mr. Yarrell and the A. rubidus of De Selys, notwith- standing the opinion of this last author, from the striking dif- ference observable in the cranium of our English specimens, as compared with the figure and description of this part in the A. rubidus, given in the §‘ Micromammalogie.’? M. de Selys says of this last, “‘crdne plus allongé que chez les autres ;” and again, “orbites moyens, allongés, étroits en arriere, les ar- cades zygomatiques étant peu arquées.” His figure is accord- ing to this description, and represents the length of the cra- nium as rather more than twice its breadth acrossthe zygomatic arches. But neither will agree with a cranium in my posses- sion, which is not more elongated than that of the A. neglecta, spoken of above, and in which the orbits are as broad, and the zygomatic arches as much bent, as in that species, the breadth across being considerably more than half the entire length. This cranium belongs to an Arvicola, which was ob- tained by Mr. Thompson from Aberarder, where it was taken in company with the A. neglecta, and along with which it was kindly forwarded to me in 1839. Neither he nor myself had any doubts of its being the A. riparia of Yarrell, though in size it rather exceeded any specimens I had seen previously. The following were its measurements :— in. lin. Headvandibody) qae.c.. crete mccereencee 3 op ee) PUG ad) Fectecccwsedseneccliceonescslaoecnecs 1 of MAL cect caciteaisas Geis oes neces escecmeiine Zea) Harspresastsccscchescccmccnecssenenticacone Oo 44 LING -LOOE Wiaieesisceieceomae coeaccestencacees O ALS Hone-foot: saccorcesvccecues eee tewatseees 0 44 the smaller British Mammalia. 275 It will be seen that the tail was more than half the length of the body : it was also of two colours, as in the A. riparia, dusky above, whitish beneath. The ears were apparent out of the fur; and the general colours were those of the species just mentioned. T will now annex the exact relative measurements of the cranium :— Entire length —.........2e0+8. eeeeenceeeasaes it Breadth across zygomatic arches ......... 63 behind the zygomatic arches ... 53 Length of the nasal bones ............--. 3 rather exceeding. Breadth of the nasal bones ...........005- 14 of space between orbits .......... 13 Menor mOb the OCDibt csesecsesseessct ane a+ 4 nearly. Breauun Gr the OLB o. sevscacscacsveecresass 2} Though much bent, the bones of the zygomatic arches are very slight compared with those of the d. neglecta, or even the A. arvalis. The incisors also are shorter and slenderer. All the molars above and below are deeply stained with a purplish ebony colour, pervading nearly the whole exposed portions of the teeth, except their grinding surfaces. There is only a faint stain of this colour on the molars of the A. neglecta and the A, arvalis. Though this cranium appears so dissimilar to that of the A. rubidus of De Selys, as represented in his work, it closely resembles his figure of that of the 4A. duodecimcostatus ; a spe- cies, however, to which it cannot be referred, inasmuch as the specimen described above had the same number of ribs as the A. arvalis. The number of vertebree I am not able to state, as previous to my having an opportunity of examining its internal struc- ture, the specimen had been deprived of a portion of its tail*. I may, however, add the measurements of the intestinal canal : iy elie Sinalleintestiness sccssceats seccneeecceses 14 9 (OPAC i oARe HoeCES EE CAPOOC OCR CE AAR ACH OCE 450419 Wrarge imtestiness..--csss-c0scotesscecose Sr 16 These measurements will be found very different from those given by Mr. Yarrell; but as we have already seen how hable to variation these parts are in relative length, and as Mr. Yar- * I may just state in explanation, that after examining its external cha- racters in 1839, the specimen was returned to Mr. Thompson, who had it skinned, I imagine, for mounting. The body was afterwards forwarded to me in spirits for dissection, in a mutilated state. T2 276 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. rell’s specimen was much smaller than mine, too much stress must not be laid on this circumstance. It deserves to be no- ticed, however, that this specimen had a gall-bladder like the A, neglecta, small yet quite distinct, which Mr. Yarrell’s had not. Hence this organ is certainly sometimes present, and at other times absent, in the same species, unless we imagine, which I conceive very improbable, that the one here described was different from his. The stomach was of the same form as in the 4. arvalis and A. neglecta. The liver consisted of seven distinct lobes, five large and two smaller ones. I have already stated that this specimen was taken at Abe- rarder, in Inverness-shire; and Mr. Thompson informs me, that, supposing it to be the A. riparia of Mr. Yarrell, he be- lieves it to be the most northern British habitat for this spe- cies. Swaffham Bulbeck, April 26, 1841. XXXIII. —Suppiement to a Catalogue of Trish Zoophytes. By Arruur Hriut Hassan, Esq. Read before the Natural History Society of Dublin, November 6th, 1840. [ With Five Engravings. ] Mr. Chairman and Gentleman, As to many of my hearers the subject of the present commu- nication, entitled a ‘ Supplement to a Catalogue of Irish Zoo- phytes,’ published in the November Number of the ¢ Annals and Magazine of Natural History,’ may be altogether new, I propose, before entering upon the consideration of it, to make some observations on Zoophytes generally. This course will, I hope, serve both to interest my audience, as well as to re- lieve, in some measure, the tediousness of a mere enumeration or technical description of species, which, however valuable to science itself, possesses but little to attract or engage the at- tention. The most careless wanderer on the sea-shore must often have noticed the beauty and delicacy of the conforma- tion of these interesting productions, rivalling in their purity and freshness the element which they inhabit and adorn, and have been struck with wonder and admiration at the evidence of designing care which they so remarkably exhibit even in their general appearance. Nor is the beauty and elegance so observable in their outward form diminished by a closer in- spection. If the power of a microscope be applied to them, and their more intimate structure be disclosed, new beauties Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 277 and wonders are made manifest to the admiring gaze. In this particular all natural productions differ from those of man and art, in whose works a minute examination renders apparent clefects, rudeness and deformity. But little more than a century has elapsed since the true nature of the productions about to occupy our attention was first discovered: prior to that period various opinions were entertained respecting them. By one class of persons, and these were by far the most numerous, they were regarded as the undoubted subjects of the vegetable kingdom, and were so arranged and classified in the various systems of the most learned botanists of that day. Nor is this to be wondered at, when we consider the striking resemblances which these ob- jects bear to vegetables, both in form and habits; some of them being eminently arborescent in their mode of growth, and being fixed by roots, either imbedded in the sand, or at- tached to rocks, stones and other substances, in the same manner as sea-weed, and consequently being incapable of lo- comotion, a character at that time considered essential to con- stitute an animal, being possessed in common by all the ani- mals then known. By asecond set of persons, at the head of whom stands the name of the illustrious Linnzeus, all the horny and flexible Zoophyta were considered to hold a station intermediate be- tween the animal and vegetable kingdoms, partaking of the nature of both. The Lithophyta were, however, arranged by him in the animal kingdom, on the supposition that lime was always an animal product. “ The animalcules of the Litho- phyta, like the testaceous tribes,” he said, “fabricated their own caleareous polypidom, forming the whole mass into tubes, each ending on the surface in pores or cells, where alone the animal seems to dwell; but the polypes of the proper Zoo- phyta, so far from constructing their plant like polypidoms, were, on the contrary, the productions or efflorescences of it ; just as the flowers do not make the herb or tree, but are the results of the vegetative life proceeding to perfection. Polypes, according to this fancy, bore the same relation to their poly- pidom that flowers do to the trunks and branches of a tree ; both grew by vegetation: but while the one evolved from the extremities blossoms, which shrunk not under external irita- tion, and were therefore properly flowers, the other put forth flowers, which, because they exhibited every sign of animality, were therefore, with reason, considered animals.” In a letter to Ellis he remarks, alluding to the Zoophytes, “they are, therefore, vegetables, with flowers like small animals.” In his ‘ Diary’ he further observes, that they are “ vegetables with re- 278 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. spect to their stems, and animals with respect to their flo- rescence.” By a third party Zoophytes were deemed to be of a mineral origin. This theory was particularly advocated by Henry Baker: “The rocks in the sea on which these corals are pro- duced,” he says, “are undoubtedly replete with mineral salts, some whereof, near their surface, being dissolved by the sea- water, must consequently saturate with their saline particles the water round them to a small distance, where, blending with the stony matter with which the sea-water always abounds, little masses will be constituted here and there and affixed to the rocks. Such adhering masses may be termed roots, which roots, attracting the saline and stony particles, according to certain laws in nature, may produce branched or other figures, and increase gradually by an apposition of particles becoming thicker near the bottom, where the saline matter is more abounding, but tapering or diminishing towards the extremi- ties, where the mineral salts must be fewer in proportion to their distance from the rock whence they originally proceed ; and the different proportions of mineral saline particles of the stony or other matter wherewith they are blended, and of marine salt, which must have a considerable share in such formations, may occasion all the variety we see. Nor does it seem more difficult to imagine that the radiated, starry, or cel- lular figures along the sides of these corals, or at the extre- mities of their branches, may derive their production from salts incorporated with the stony matter, than that the curious delineations and appearances of minute shrubs and mosses on slates, stones, etc., are owing to the shootings of salts inter- mixed with mineral particles ; and yet ‘hese are generally al- lowed to be the work of mineral steams or exhalations.” It is scarcely necessary to observe, that the whole of the theories of which I have given but a very short outline, highly inge- nious and interesting as they are, are yet untenable: the beautiful and poetic hypothesis of Linnzeus is, however, the nearest approximation to the truth. We learn from Dr. John- ston’s excellent ‘ Introduction to his British Zoophytes’, from which I have had occasion to quote largely, when speaking of the opinions of Linnzus, and to which I must again refer when mentioning those of Ellis, that Ferrante Imperato, an apothecary in Naples, was the first naturalist, according to M. de Blainville, distinctly to publish as the result of his pro- per observations the animality of corals and madrepores ; and he is said to have accompanied the description of the species which fell under his notice with illustrative figures of consi- derable accuracy. His ‘ Historia Naturale’ was printed at Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 279 Naples in 1599; but although again reprinted in 1672, the book and the knowledge it contained had sunk into such ob- livion, that when Peysonnel, in the year 1727, communicated the same discovery to the Academy of Sciences in Paris, it was received by the members of that learned body in a man- ner which is sufficient to convince us that it was entirely new to them, and exposed the author to the obloquy and censure which are the usual portions of an original discoverer. To John Ellis, however, a merchant in London, is to be accorded the honour of having placed the fact of the animality of Zoophytes beyond all doubt or controversy. The inquiries entered into by this individual were prosecuted with an ardour and a diligence worthy of the subject, and affording a bright and refreshing example for others to imitate ; and it is pleasing to notice, that the zeal he displayed and the labour he bestowed were amply recompensed by the importance of the results to which his investigations led. “There was nothing unformed or mystical in Ellis’s opinion. Certain marine productions, which, under the names of Lithophyta and Ceratophyta, had been arranged among vegetables, and were still very generally believed to be so, he maintained and proved, with a most satis- factory fulness of evidence, to be entirely of an animal nature, the tenements and products of animals similar in many re- spects to the naked freshwater polype. By examining them in a living state, through an ordinary microscope, he saw these polypes in the denticles or cells of the zoophyte; he wit- nessed them display their tentacula for the capture of their prey; their varied actions and sensibility to external impres- sions and their mode of propagation; he saw further that these little creatures were organically connected with the cells, and could not remove from them, and that although each cell was appropriated to a single individual, yet was this united by a tender thready line to the fleshy part that occupies the mid- dle of the whole coralline, and in this manner connected with all the individuals of that coralline. The conclusion was irre- sistible: the presumed plant was the skin or covering of a sort of miniature hydra,—a conclusion which Ellis strengthened by an examination of their covering separately, which he said was as much an animal structure as the nails or horns of beasts, or the shell of the tortoise : for it differs from sea-plants in texture as well as hardness, and likewise in their chemical produc- tion; for sea-plants, properly so called, such as the Alge, Fuci, etc., afford in distillation little or no traces of a volatile salt; whereas the corallines afford a considerable quantity, and in burning yield a smell somewhat resembling that of burnt horn and other animal substances, which of itself is a 280 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. proof that this class of bodies, though it has the vegetable form, yet is not entirely of a vegetable nature.” Among the many recent cultivators of this interesting de- partment of natural history, the name of Dr. Johnston of Ber- wick stands pre-eminent, whose excellent work on the Bri- tish Zoophytes has done much to exalt the subject, and to diffuse a more general taste for its cultivation. I trust that ere long we shall be favoured with a second volume on the Zoophytes of Great Britain by that gentleman. The term Zoophyte is applied to all those productions which, bearing a strong resemblance to vegetables in form and some other particulars, are yet of an animal nature. The more arborescent of them are often called corallines, a name which is peculiarly appropriate, being a derivative of the word coral, to which they are intimately allied, and by means of which such gigantic changes are daily being effected. Islands, and I might almost say, without incurring the charge of exagge- ration, continents are being raised from the deep abysses of the ocean, to be, perchance, at some future period clothed with vegetation, and peopled like unto our own fair land—to be the arena on which many eventful scenes in the world’s his- tory are to be performed; and these mighty results are to be brought about by the agency of insects scarcely perceptible to our unaided sight, but whose operations, though slow, silent and invisible, are yet certain and unceasing :— “ Unconscious, not unworthy, instruments, By which a hand invisible was rearing A new creation in the secret deep. Omnipotence wrought in them, with them, by them ; Hence, what Omnipotence alone could do Worms did. I saw the living pile ascend, ‘The mausoleum of its architects, Sull dying upwards as their labours closed : Slime the material, but the slime was turn’d ‘fo adamant by their petrific touch; Frail were their frames, ephemeral their lives— Their masonry imperishable.” In nothing is God’s infinity and man’s littleness more stri- kingly exhibited and contrasted than in the operations of na- ture upon a grand scale, and this is particularly evident in the instance of the formation of coral islands to which I have re- ferred. The extreme simplicity of the means employed for the attaimment of such vast ends cannot but be a subject of astonishment and admiration to every reflecting mind, and this simplicity is apparent in all the ways and workings of nature. How different is it with man’s designs ; how compli- Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 281 cated are the means which he employs for the attainment of his projects ; and often how inefficient are they for the fulfil- ment of the end proposed, and how easily are they overturned and annihilated by the intervention of some natural cause— his greatest labours and most cherished hopes frequently being dashed to the ground or buried in the deep by some earthquake or storm ! “« Zoophytes,” to adopt the language of Dr. Johnston, “ pre- sent to the physiologist the simplest independent structures compatible with the existence of animal life, enabling him to examine some of its phenomena in isolation, and free from the obscurity which greater complexity of anatomy entails. The means of their propagation and increase are the first of a series of facts on which a theory of generation must arise ; the existence of vibratile cilia on the surface of the membrane, which has since been shown to be so general and influential among animals, was first discovered in their study, and in them is first detected the traces of a circulation carried on inde- pendently of a heart and vessels. The close adhesion of life to a low organization; its marvellous capacity of redintegra- tion; the organic junction of hundreds and thousands of in- dividuals in one body, the possibility of which fiction had scarcely ventured to paint in its vagaries, have all in this class their most remarkable illustration.” I have ascertained that all the more transparent Zoophytes possess highly lumimous properties. This fact I first disco- vered in a specimen of Laomedia gelatinosa, and subsequently in a great variety of other species. If a portion of it, adhering to the sea-weed to which it is attached, be taken from the water and agitated, a great number of bright phosphorescent sparks will be emitted ; these sparks proceed from each of the denticles of the coralline containing polypi, and the phzeno- menon is equally apparent, whether the specimen be in or out of water. The imagination could scarcely conceive a more beautiful spectacle than would be furnished by the shining of countless myriads of these tiny lamps, lighting up the dark recesses and caves of the ocean. I lately had an opportunity of beholding this novel and interesting sight of the phospho- rescence of Zoophytes to great advantage, when on board one of the Devonshire trawling-boats which frequent this coast. The trawl was raised at midnight, and great quantities of coral- lines were entangled in the meshes of the network, all shining like myriads of the brightest diamonds. I would advise any person wishing to witness this beautiful spectacle on a large scale, to sally torth some dark night to the sea-shore, and dis- turb, either with a stick or the foot, the sea-wrack left by the 282 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. receding tide, among which numerous corallines will be im- bedded, particularly if a high wind have prevailed during the day. Although I have not as yet had an opportunity of car- rying into effect what I here recommend, I am convinced that any individual who would be at the trouble and possessed sufficient resolution to leave a warm fire at this uninviting season, and encounter the rough. but refreshing sea-breeze, would meet with an ample reward for the labour bestowed and self-denial exercised. The fact of the phosphorescence of one species of Sertularia, S. pumila, was, I have lately learned, discovered by Stewart some time since; but the announce- ment of it did not, it appears, lead to further inquiries into this interesting subject. An important distinctive character between Ascidian Zoo- phytes and those of other classes, may be derived from the arrangement of the tentacula. In the Ascidian type of Zoo- phytes the tentacula are arranged in a determinate order, be- ing disposed either in a crescent, as in some freshwater species, or in the form of a bell, as in the marine orders of this class ; whereas in the Hydroid, Helianthoid and Asteroid classes they do not describe any regular figure, but are irregularly disposed around the mouths of the polypi. An Ascidian zoophyte, therefore, may at once be distinguished from all others by observing the arrangement of the tentacula, and without reference to internal organization. It is difficult to conceive anything more strikingly beautiful, on a small scale, than one of these Ascidian Zoophytes viewed under the field of a microscope: the regular and elegant cup-like form de- scribed by the tentacula; the ceaseless and rapid action of the cilia; the uniform direction of the current which flows over these, carrying with it numberless revolving particles, some whereof are destined for the little creatures’ sustenance ; and all these, if seen through a strong light, clothed in the brightest prismatic colours, cannot fail to elicit the admiration of the beholder. Should the slightest motion occur to disturb it, the polype instantly withdraws itself within the shelter of its little habitation, at once its home and its grave, and is con-. cealed from sight ; its beauties are however again displayed as soon as the agitation of the surrounding water ceases. It is difficult, I say, to conceive a more beautiful or interesting spec- tacle than is furnished by a single polype when thus viewed ; but what must be the appearance formed by the countless thousands of these animals which daily thus display them- selves, peopling cave, rock and pool! and yet nearly six thou- sand years have elapsed since their first creation before the eye of man rested on them. Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 283 Not amongst the least pleasurable of the emotions which we experience in the study and contemplation of these beau- tiful productions, is that feeling of heaJth and vigour which attends us in our excursions in search of them. At one time wandering upon the smooth and golden strand, exploring among the tangled sea-wrack left by the receding tide for these minute treasures of creation ; now diving into some deep and dark caverns, in which the waves roar and dash against the rocks with terrific violence, but still producing an effect upon the mind pleasing and enchaining ; at another stretching oneself at full length beside some clear and liquid pool, in which the most beautiful and diversified landscapes may be described—rocks, trees, shrubs and flowers in miniature, all are palpable to the least imaginative mind, the colours of the sea-weed rivalling the brightest and most varied tints of an autumnal forest. How superior, in the purity and satisfaction resulting from their pursuit, are the pleasures which we derive from the con- templation of the works of God, as manifested in the crea- tion, to those sought after, by so many, and with such eager- ness, in crowded and bustling cities ! “I care not, Fortune, what you me deny ; You cannot rob me of free nature’s grace ; You cannot shut the windows of the sky Through which Aurora shows her bright’ning face ; You cannot bar my constant feet to trace The lonely shore at dewy morn and eve. Let health my nerves and finer fibres brace, And I their toys to the great children ieave : Of nature, feeling, virtue, nought can me bereave.”’ Among the uses of these minims of creation, one of the high- est appears to me to be, that of exciting in the mind of mana spirit of inquiry, calculated to detach his thoughts from the sordid selfishness of worldly occupation, and to raise them with feelings of admiration and love to that Omnipotent Being, who at the first formation of things pronounced all his works “ very good.” Entreating the attention of the Society for a short time longer, I shall at once proceed to the consideration of the matter of the ‘ Supplement?’ itself. The species are enumerated in the order in which they oc- cur in Dr. Johnston’s ‘ Zoophytes.’ Coryne squamata. Found growing upon Fucus siliquosus, opposite Sea-point, south side of Dublin Bay, above low-water mark. Hermia glandulosa. This species sometimes attains a height of three inches. The glandular heads of the tentacula appear to be, 284 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. furnished with minute cups, similar to those of the Cuttle-fish, by means of which the polypi are enabled to hold their prey ; and not, as stated by Mr. Lister, covered with ‘‘ short projections, like blunt hairs.” The reproductive gemmules are supported on a short foot- stalk, and are fewer in number and several times larger than those of the preceding species. Dublin Bay, on various Fuci; not common. Tubularia larynx. Both varieties of this species are trawled up in great abundance off Howth and Lambay. ‘They are also found attached to the under surface of stones, on the east side of Kings- town Harbour. Thoa muricata.—Giant’s Causeway. Sertularia Margareta. Polypidom branched, branches alternate ; rachis straight; cells nearly opposite, ovato-tubular, contracted on the outer side; vesicles 4-sided, armed with 8 long teeth. This species, in the absence of its remarkable vesicles, requires a very careful examination to distinguish it from S. abietina. ‘There are, however, well-marked differences between them. ‘the stem in this species is straight, whereas in S. abietina it is flexuose ; the cells are more nearly opposite, and are contracted on the outer side ; aper- tures plain. The branches are alternate; there are three cells on the rachis in the interval between each branch. Vesicles 4-sided, very large, increasing in size at the distal end, and armed near the summit with 8 stout spines, two placed at each angle. To this new and interesting species I have assigned the Christian name of a lady, distinguished not only for an ardent love of the works of nature, but as a zealous collector in various branches of natural history on these shores. See Plate VI. fig. 3, 4. A Sertularia is figured and described in Ellis’s and Solander’s ‘ Zoophytes’’ under the name of S. pinaster, which bears a consi- derable resemblance to the above. I do not, however, believe them to be of the same species, as the vesicles in this are furnished with but four spines. Dredged up off Howth sparingly; also found near the Giant’s Causeway. S. pumila. The number of tentacula in this species is not very constant, but usually about 16: they are not disposed in any de- terminate order, as they always are in the Ascidian type of Zoophytes, but are variously arranged. Sertularia filicula. ‘This species was incorrectly enumerated as among those found in Dublin Bay in my Catalogue. It is not met with upon that coast; I have, however, obtained a few specimens in the neighbourhood of the Giant’s Causeway. Thuiaria articulata. ‘The stem in the specimens found in Dublin Bay is not naked on the lower half, as it is generally described, but is clothed with pinne to near its base, giving the polypidom a very beautiful appearance. See Plate VII. fig. 1, 2. ‘The specimen figured in this plate is the finest I ever saw, and I could not resist the temp- tation of giving a drawing of it. Not unfrequently obtained by trawling off Howth. Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 285 Plumularia pinnata. Is generally found growing on a long fila- mentous sea-weed, up the stem of which it creeps often for more than a foot in extent, and round which the root-fibres form a com- plete sheath. The specimens thrown up by the sea are usually de- nuded of the short branches which proceed from the pinne. ‘The vesicles are produced in great abundance, pyriform, blunt and plain above: each vesicle contains 3 or 4 dark-coloured ova. Dr. John- ston, in a letter I lately received from him, remarks, “I long ago discovered the error of giving toothed vesicles to Pl. pinnata: they are only toothed from laceration, after the ova have escaped. It is curious that the ova should be produced in such numbers from the root-fibres; but such is a common occurrence with this pretty species.” Tolerably abundant in various parts of Dublin Bay. Pl. setacea. The upper part of the vesicles of this species is pro- longed into a short tube, affording an additional distinctive charac- ter between it and PJ. pinnata, which it so closely resembles. Trawled up off Howth, very rare. Pi. Catharina. Frequently trawled up off Howth and Lambay, in deep water, and but rarely cast upon the shore. Pl. cristata. I have examined a specimen of this species, ob- tained by my friend G. J. Allman, Esq., near Cork, having plumes nearly three inches in length, and in which the ovarian vesicles are produced only from the main stalks or midribs, giving to the whole polypidom a very beautiful and unique appearance. Pl. myriophyllum. Not common: obtained only by trawling off Howth and Lambay, Pl. frutescens. 1 have met with but one specimen of this species, consisting of a single plume elegantly tapering to a point above. See Plate VIII. fig. 1. Alcyonidium rubrum, Miller. Dr. Johnston considers this to be but a mere variety of Alcyonidium digitatum, or that species in its ‘* primary crustaceous condition.” ‘That it is not Aleyonidium digi- tatum in its primary crustaceous condition, I am convinced, from the circumstance of having frequently met with it of a very large size, as large as the ordinary species ever occurred to me, nor do I consider it to be a variety; for although no difference exists in the number of the tentacula or in the form of the spiculz, it yet, in my opinion, must be regarded as a distinct species, as I have always met with it of the same uniform deep red colour; neither have I been able to detect any gradations of colour between it and the common kind, as might be expected were it but a variety. I have occasionally, too, obtained both growing upon the same shell, each possessing its own peculiar colour; and this is a strong fact in fa- vour of their distinctness, as the great difference in colour could not be accounted for by a reference to any external causes, both specimens being subjected to the same influences. Actinia mesembryanthemum. Everywhere common off the coast of Dublin. A. Bellis. “ Body elongated ; the lower part narrow, smooth, the 286 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. upper enlarged and glandularly warty : oral disc expanded, lobed : tentacula in several rows, variegated.” -—Geriner. This beautiful species is certainly no variety of Actinia gemmacea, as has been supposed by some from the perusal of Gvertner’s de- scription of it. It inhabits the fissures of rocks, in which the whole of the body of the polypus is concealed, the expanded cup-like head alone being visible above the margin of the fissure. The body is often lengthened to the extent of two inches ; its basis is contracted, but gradually widens upwards towards the calyx ; the lower portion of it is nearly colourless, higher up it becomes of a flesh colour, this changing into a greenish brown, of which it continues up as far as the feelers. The upper half of the body is covered with nu- merous small white glands, which possess great powers of suction. The diameter of the calyx, which is somewhat cupped, in the larger specimens often exceeds two inches; its margin does not describe a perfect circle, but is variously festooned. The colour of the disc is dark brown, ornamented with broad bands of opaque white, and finely streaked and dotted with light yellow. The feelers are very small, placed on the edge of the calyx in several rows, to the depth of 4rd of an inch; those nearest the disc, also, are about 3rd of an inch in length, and are the longest, the outermost tentacula being but little more than papille ; they are of a lighter brown than the disc, and are variegated with transverse bands and spots of white. The shades of brown in the different parts of each Actinia vary con- siderably with the specimens. Found in a clear pool, opposite Dalkey Island, but little below high-water mark, the only locality in which I have ever met with it ; and what is not a little peculiar is, that it is confined to that one pool, although there are others in its immediate vicinity apparently equally suitable for it. A. gemmacea. Everywhere common on the coast of Dublin. A. dianthus. Frequently trawled up off Howth and Lambay. A. maculata. The tentacula of this species are not contractile : in this particular it resembles the genus Anthea of Johnston. A single specimen, trawled up off Howth. Anthea cereus. Although this species has not the power of short- ening its feelers in the same way as the Actinias, yet, if specimens be kept for some time in sea-water, their length becomes dimi- nished, not by contraction, but by a process of invagination. The three varieties of this species, described by Gertner, are found in Sandy-cove, near Dublin; the green one but sparingly. They usually adhere to Fuci, generally to Fucus serratus, and but rarely to stones. Below low-water mark. Valkeria cuscuta. Branches opposite ; cells in clusters, oval. The above is the correct definition of this species, which it was long ere I could identify by Ellis’s description of it. He described the cells as being ‘in pairs, usually opposite,” whereas they are really in clusters. Ellis’s description is only applicable to the species in an imperfect and injured state. Valkeria cuscuta is readily di- Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 287 stinguishable from V. imbricata, with which it was at first con- founded by me, first, by the more delicate texture of the whole polypidom ; secondly, by the smaller size and oval shape of the cells. In Valkeria imbricata the cells are cylindrical ; the clusters of cells in it, too, are more nearly approximated, and the number of cells in each cluster is more numerous than in V. cuscuta. Abundant, Sandy-cove, near Dublin. [To be continued. } XXXIV.—List of Phanerogamous Plants, together with the Cryptogamic Orders Filices, Equisetaceze, and Lycopodi- acez, observed in the Shetland Islands. By Tuomas Ep- MONDSTON, Jun., Esq. Monanpria Monoeynia. 1. Hippuris vulgaris. Deep muddy streams. Common. 2. Salicornia herbacea. Salt marshes. ~ Frequent. Monanpria Dieynta. 8. Callitriche verna. Pools and marshes. Common. Dianpria Monoeynia. 4. Veronica officinalis. Not very common. Chiefly in dry stony places.—Var. 3. rigida. Common in all waste grounds: stem erect; very rigid leaves, not serrated ; all the plant glabrous ; cap- sule very distinctly winged. montana. Rare. Ollaberry ; Northmavin. ——— Beccabunga. Rare. Near Tingwall. Anagallis. Rare. Brook near Laxfirth Mainland. 5. Pinguicula vulgaris. Uncultivated grounds. Everywhere abundant. Dranpria Dieynia. 6. Anthoranthum odoratum, Common. Trianpria Monoeynta. . Iris Pseudacorus. Common in all damp places. . Schenus nigricans. Damp heaths. Abundant. albus. Marshy places. Rare. Moola Unst. 9. Scirpus cespitosus. Heaths. Very abundant. lacustris. Rare. Loch of Lund, Unst: probably not in- digenous. palustris. Salt marshes chiefly. Common. 10. Eriophorum vaginatum. On the more elevated heaths, as Her- maness, Unst. Most common. polystachion. All marshy places. Common. 11. Nardus stricta. Heathy grounds. Common. CsI TrRIANDRIA DiGyNIA. 12. Phalaris arundinacea. Common. 13. Phleum pratense. On the richer grounds abundant. 288 Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 14. Alopecurus geniculatus. Wet places. Common. 15. Agrostis vulgaris. Common. — alba. Wet places. Abundant. 16. Aira cespitosa. Waste places. Not common. —— flexuosa. Heaths. Frequent. precox. Cultivated grounds. Common. 17. Holcus lanatus. Waste and cultivated ground. Common. 18. Melica cerulea. Heaths, &e. Common. 19. Poa trivialis. Pastures, &e. Common. — pratensis. Meadows and pastures. Abundant. — annua. Waste grounds. Common. 20. Glyceria fluitans. Streams and ditches, Abundant. 21. Briza media. Rare. Unst. 22. Dactylis glomerata. Pastures, &c. Common. 23. Cynosurus cristatus. Meadows and pastures. 24. Festuca ovina. Dry pastures. Common. vivipara. Elevated heaths. Common. duriuscula. Common. elatior. Sides of lakes and streams. Rare. 25. Bromus mollis. Fields and waste grounds. Common. arvensis. Fields. Rare. 26. Avena fatua. Not common. Shetland name Hug-aits. 27. Arundo Phragmites. Rare. Loch near Ronas-hill. — Calamagrostis. Very rare. Loch near Faedaland, North- mavin. 28. Lolium perenne. Meadows and pastures. 29. Elymus arenarius. Sandy sea-shores. Common. 30. Triticum repens. Everywhere common. Shetland name Whigga. Terranpria Monoeynta. 31. Scabiosa succisa. All damp humid soils. 32. Asperula odorata. Dry banks. Rare. Bardister, Northmavin. 33. Galium savatile. Heaths. Abundant. —verum. Dry banks. Frequent. boreale. Sides of lakes. Not common. Aparine. Sea-shores. Common. 34. Plantago major and lanceolata. Waste places. Common. media. Not common. maritima and Coronopus. Sea-shore. Common. 35. Alchemilla vulgaris. Fallow lands. Rare. Near Ollaberry. alpina. Rare. Ronas-hill. TETRANDRIA TETRAGYNIA. 36. Potamogeton natans. Shallow pools. Common. a heterophyllus. Deeper ditches. Abundant. 37. Sagina procumbens. Waste grounds. Common. Prenranpria Monoeynia. 38. Myosotis arvensis. Fields, &c. Common. cespitosa. Brooks and pools. Abundant. Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 289 39. Pulmonaria maritima. Gravelly sea-shores. Not common. 40. Lycopsis arvensis. Fields. Common. 41. Primula vulgaris. Dry pastures. Common. 42. Menyanthes trifoliata. Deep ditches. Common. 43. Anagallis tenella. Bogs. Not common. 44. Azalea procumbens. Rare. Ronas Hill, Northmavin. 45. Jasione montana. Dry banks. Common. 46. Viola canina. Common. tricolor. Everywhere abundant. 47. Lonicera Periclymenum. Cliffs, &e. Not common. 48. Hedera Helix. Rare. Pictishburgh. Walls. PenTANDRIA DIGyNIA. 49. Gentiana amarella. On limestone. Not common. campestris. Pastures. Common. 50. Daucus Carota. Waste ground. Abundant. 51. Cherophyllum sylvestre. Waste places. Common. 52. Angelica sylvestris. Damp situations. Abundant. 53. Ligusticum scoticum. Rocky or sandy sea-shores. 54. Carum Carui. Damp meadows. Rare. Near Refirth, Island of Yell: probably not indigenous. 55. Hydrocotyle vulgaris. Marshy places. Common. 56. Heracleum Sphondylium. Dry pastures. Abundant. 57. Conium maculatum. Shady situations. Not common. 58. Pastinaca sativa. Waste ground. Not common. PENTANDRIA TETRAGYNIA. 59. Parnassia palustris, Wet meadows. Not common. PENTANDRIA PENTAGYNIA. 60. Statice Armeria. Sea-shores. Abundant. Limonium. Rare. Knab, near Lerwick. 61. Linum catharticum. Dry heaths. Common. PENTANDRIA HEXAGYNIA. 62. Drosera longifolia. Rare. Lamhoga, Island of Fetlar. — rotundifolia. Mossy hills. Rare. Yell and Northmavin. Hexanpria Monoeyrnia. 63. Scilla verna. Common everywhere. nutans. Rare. Probably not indigenous. 64. Narthecium ossifragum. Turfy heaths. Abundant. 65. Juncus effusus. Turfy bogs. Common. Shetland name, Floss. trifidus. Elevated bogs. Not common. squarrosus. Boggy heaths. Common. uliginosus. Moist places, Common. triglumis. Rare. Ronas Hill. 66. Luciola sylvatica. Shady glens. Abundant. — campestris. Barren pastures. Common. Hexanpria TRIGYNIA, 67. Rumee crispus. Very common. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. U 290 68. 69. 72. 73. Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. Rumer Acetosa and Acetosella. Abundant everywhere. Triglochin palustre. Muddy situations. Common. Hepranprta Monoeynta. Trientalis europea. Mountain heaths. Rare. Hermaness, Unst. Ocranpria MonoeGynia. . Epilobium angustifolium. Cliffs. Not common. montanum. Rare. Near Snarravoe, Unst. palustre. Wet places. Abundant. . Vaccinium Myrtillus. Dry heaths. Common. Erica vulgaris (Calluna). Common. cinerea. Common. Tetralix, Abundant. OcrTANDRIA TRIGYNIA. Polygonum Persicaria, Abundant. Wet places. Bistorta. Rare. Broo, Dunrossness. aviculare. Cultivated grounds. Common. Decanpria Monoecynia. . Arbutus Uva-ursi. Not common. — alpina. Rare. Ronas Hill. DecanpRIA DiGynia. . Saxifraga oppositifolia. Rare. Fitful Head. DecanpriA TRIGYNIA. . Silene maritima. Stony sea-shores, Abundant. acaulis. Dry hills and stony places. Frequent. . Stellaria media. Waste and cultivated ground. Common. . Arenaria peploides. Sea-shores. Common. ; marina. Sea-coast. Not rare. norvegica. This interesting addition to the British Flora is confined, so far as I know, to the serpentine formation around the Bay of Baltasound in this island. Its specific description is as follows:—Root fibrous, long; stems numerous, branched, procumbent, sometimes more or less erect ; leaves small, ovate, fleshy, glabrous, somewhat imbricate ; flowers terminal, solitary, white, rather large ; petals generally six, sometimes five, broadly ovate; calyx-sepals five, fleshy, glabrous as the leaves. Very abundant on the gravelly barren hills to the north of the bay, growing nearly on a level with the sea, along with Cerastium latifolium and Cardamine hastulata, which, with the exception of Statice Armeria and Plantago maritima, are almost the only plants to be found in its vicinity. I first discovered this plant in May 1837: I was then only commencing the study of botany, and though I knew its genus, and so marked it in my herbarium, I could not make out its species. In the end of July, the same year, Dr. Gilbert Macnab came to Unst, in the course of a botanical tour he was making through Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 291 Shetland ; I met him at some distance from Baltasound, and ac- companied him thither; on the way, as he was questioning me on the botany of the island, I mentioned two plants to him as being (as I thought) rare or peculiar,—the one turned out to be the Pisum maritimum of Linneus (Lathyrus pisiformis, Hook. ‘Br. Fl.’), the other was this species of Arenaria; I named to him the genera to which the two plants belonged, but wished to have his opinion on the species. Next day, in looking over my little collection, we found the specimens of the two plants : Dr. Macnab thought they were new to the British Flora, and he had not seen them before; he was also of the same opinion as myself as to their genera. I guided him to the localities where I first found the two plants, and we procured abundance of specimens. A few days after, when Dr. Macnab left Unst, I gave him a number of specimens for the opinions of Drs. Hooker and Graham. Dr. Graham at first pronounced it to be nondescript, but was soon induced to change his opinion’ from seeing a plant in Prof. Hooker’s herbarium (gathered by Sir George Mackenzie in Iceland) labelled as Arenaria norvegica, which he thought agreed with the Unst plant. I have since botanically examined almost the whole of my native islands, but I have not been able to find a single plant of this species, except in the locality where it was first found by me. I have only further to add, that I have endeavoured to cultivate it by transplanting to a garden; I have not, however, succeeded, although plants of Cardamine hastulata and Ceras- tium latifolium, under the same circumstances, grew and took root. I have, however, not had an opportunity of trying to raise it from the seed. . Cherleria sedoides. Rare. Hill of Klibberswick, Unst. DECANDRIA PENTAGYNIA. . Sedum Telephium. Rocks by the sea-side. Rare. . Agrostemma Githago. Scarcely indigenous. . Lychnis Flos-cuculi. Meadows and pastures. Common. sylvatica (L. dioica). Fields, &c. Common.—/. ves- pertina. Rare. . Cerastium vulgatum. Fields and waste grounds. Common. viscosum. Common. tetrandrum. Sand. Rare. Balta Island. latifolium. Tare. Near Baltasound only. . Spergula arvensis. Abundant. Shetland name, Meldy. IcosANDRIA PENTAGYNIA. . Crategus Oxyacantha. Rare. Near Tingwall. . Sorbus Aucuparia. Precipices and cliffs. Not common. . Spirea Ulmaria. Swampy meadows. Common. IcosANDRIA POLYGYNIA. . Rosa tomentosa. Dry banks, &c. Abundant, U2 292 89. 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. o7- 98. 93: 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. Potentilla anserina. Waste grounds. Common. Roots sweet and nutritious, and occasionally eaten under the name of ‘ Mur- raks.’ Tormentilla officinalis. Dry heaths and pastures. Common. reptans. Dry heaths. Rare. Comarum palustre. Wet boggy ground. Common. PotyanpriA Monoeynta. Papaver Rheas. Corn-fields. Not common. dubium., Common. PoLyANDRIA PoLyGyYNIA. Thalictrum alpinum. Moist heaths. Abundant. Ranunculus Flammula. Watery places. Common. repens. Dry barren pastures. Abundant. acris. Abundant everywhere. Ficaria ranunculoides. Meadows and pastures. Frequent. Caltha palustris. Marshy places. Common. DipynamiA GYNOSPERMIA. Ajuga reptans. Common. Lamium purpureum, Waste and cultivated grounds. Common. intermedium. Not common. Galeopsis Tetrahit. Cultivated grounds. Common. Stachys palustris. Moist meadows. Common. ambigua. Not common. ‘Tingwall. Thymus Serpyllum. Dry heaths. Common. Prunella vulgaris. Meadows and pastures. Common. DipyNAMIA ANGIOSPERMIA. Euphrasia officinalis. Dry pastures. Abundant. Pedicularis sylvatica. Moist heaths. Abundant. palustris. Boggy pastures. Common. TETRADYNAMIA SILICULOSA. . Draba incana. Rare. Unst and Fetlar. . Thlaspi Bursa-pastoris. Waste and cultivated ground. . Cochlearia officinalis. Sea-shore and inland. Common. . Bunias Cakile. Sandy sea-shore. Common, TETRADYNAMIA SILIQUOSA. . Cardamine pratensis. Moist meadows. Common. hastulata (Arabis petrea). Near Baltasound, Unst. Rare. . Sinapis arvensis. Corn-fields. Common. Shetland name Runjy. . Raphanus Raphanistrum. Fields. Common. Monapepuia DECANDRIA. . Geranium pheum. Rare. Island of Fetlar. molle. Meadows and pastures. Common. 113. 114. 115. 116. LT? 118. . Vicia Cracca. Meadows and pastures. Common. . Trifolium repens. Meadows and pastures. Common. Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 293 DiapEeLtpuiaA HExanpria. Fumaria parviflora. Sandy fields. Abundant. DrapELPuia OcranpRria. Polygala vulgaris. Dry heaths. Common. DiaADELPHIA DECANDRIA. Ulex europeus. Dry heaths. Not common. Hill of Wormie- dale. Anthyllis Vulneraria. Dry pastures. Abundant. Pisum maritimum (var.). Very rare. Sandy down. Burraforth, Unst, only. Root very long, creeping to a great extent, send- ing up stems at intervals; stem procumbent, angular; sti- pulas sagittate; tendrils with 3—5 pair of lanceolate, glaucous, dark green leaflets; racemes terminal, on long peduncles ; flowers shortly pedicellate, moderately large; wings very beautiful, bright purple, with darker veins ; standard and keel whitish. This plant was first added to the ‘ Flora Scotica’ by myself in June 1837. Lathyrus pratensis. Fields and way-sides. Common. pratense. Dry meadows, &c. Abundant. . Lotus corniculatus. Pastures. Common. PoLYADELPHIA PoLYANDRIA. . Hypericum pulchrum. Dry heaths. Frequent. SYNGENESIA AUQUALIS. . Sonchus arvensis. Corn-fields. Common. oleraceus. Waste or cultivated ground. Frequent. . Leontodon Taraxacum. Meadows and pastures. Not common. autumnale. Common. . Hieraceum sylvaticum. Dry banks. Frequent. maculatum. Abundant. . Arctium lappa. Sandy soils. Rare. Dunrossness. . Carduus lanceolatus. Waste and cultivated ground. Common. arvensis. Corn-fields. Common. . Onopordum Acanthium. Gravelly soils. Not common. SYNGENESIA SUPERFLUA. . Tanacetum vulgare. Road-sides, &c. Abundant. . Artemisia vulgaris. Waste ground. Common. . Gnaphalium dioicum. Heaths and dry pastures. Common. . Serratula alpina (Saussurea alpina). Rare. Ronas Hill. . Tussilago Farfara. Clayey soils. Not common. Petasites. Humid meadows. Not uncommon. . Senecio vulgaris. Cultivated grounds. Common. Jacobea. Meadows and pastures. Common. 294 135. 136. 137. 138. 139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. Solidago Virgaurea. Dry heaths and pastures. Common. Bellis perennis. Meadows and pastures. Common. Pyrethrum inodorum. Waste grounds. Common. Chrysanthemum Leucanthemum. Meadows and pastures. Fre- uent. Achillea Millefolium. Dry meadows. Common. Ptarmica. Humid meadows. Common. GynanpriA Monanppla. Orchis mascula. Meadows and pastures. Frequent. latifolia. Wet situations. Abundant. Satyrium viride (Habenaria virid.). Heaths. Common. Zostera marina. Sea-shore. Abundant. Monacr1a Monanpria. Euphorbia helioscopia. Cultivated grounds. Common. Monacia TRIANDRIA. Carex dioica. Marshes. Abundant. ovalis. Heaths. Not common. —— arenaria. Sandy sea-shores, Common. recurva. Dry heaths. Common. ——. binervis. Moist heaths. Frequent. —— ampullacea. Watery situations. Monacia TerranpRia. Sparganium natans. Lakes. Abundant. simplex. Common. Littorella lacustris (Plantago uniflora). Common. Urtica dioica. Roads and way-sides. Common. Myriophyllum spicatum. Ditches and pools. Frequent. Betula alba, Shady banks. Not common. Diacra DIANDRIA. Salix fusca. Dry heaths. Common. aurita. Banks of lakes, &c. Abundant. aquatica. Watery places. Not common. herbacea. Rare. Ronas Hill. Diacra TRIANDRIA. . Empetrum nigrum. Heaths. Common. Berries greedily de- voured by Lestris parasiticus. Diacia OcTANDRIA. . Rhodiola rosea. Rocks and cliffs. Common. Diacr1a MonapELPuHia. 3. Juniperus communis. Rare. Cliffs, Koningsburgh. Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 295 Potyeamia Monacta. 154. Atriplex laciniata. Sea-coast. Common. patula. Cultivated and waste ground. CryproGaMiIA FILices. 155. Polypodium vulgare. Walls and shady banks. Common. 156. Aspidium Filiz-mas. Common. Filiz-femina. Common. 157. Scolopendrium vulgare. Moist shady places. Rare. 158. Osmunda regalis. Very rare. Near Sandwick, Unst. Lunaria. Hilly pastures. Common. 159. Ophioglossum vulgatum. Very rare. Burn of Sundybanks, near Scalloway, Mainland. Cryprocamia LycopopiAceEz. 160. Lycopodium clavatum. Rare. Ronas Hill. Selaginoides. Moist heaths. Common. Selago. Also abundant. CrypToGaMia EQuisETACE. 161. Equisetum sylvaticum. Shady banks. Not common. fluviatile. Wet places. Rare. Loch of Cliff. palustre. Marshes. Common. arvense. Moist fields. Abundant. EXTINCT SPECIES. Pinus Picea. An old man told me that he found a fir tree, about six feet below the surface of the ground, when digging peat at the east side of Unst. It was about forty feet in length, and about six feet in circum- ference. It was much decayed on the outside, but quite sound in the heart. The cones of the Silver Fir (according to Dr. Neill) have been found in the peat moors in Orkney, although I am not aware of their being observed in Shetland ; and as this species seems, when planted, to succeed the best of all its tribe, it may be supposed that the tree in question was of this species. Corylus Avellana. The nuts and trunks of this tree have also at different times been dug up in the peat moors. 296 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations XXX V.—On the Composition of Chalk Rocks and Chalk Marl by invisible Organic Bodies: from the Observations of Dr. Ehrenberg*. By Tuomas Weaver, [Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S., NR AISA’ occ. Ses Tue remarkable discoveries effected, and the new light thrown on geology by the indefatigable researches of Dr. Ehrenberg, during several years past, through the medium of the microscope, particularly in respect of the Infusoria and Polythalamia tribes, highly instructive and interesting as they must be to all naturalists, are especially so to the geologist, since they open to him a large field of inquiry, eminently de- serving of cultivation. ‘To draw attention to this subject, which involves no less than an investigation as to what extent minute organic bodies, invisible to the naked eye, may have contri- buted to the production of all limestone formations, whether of an origin posterior or anterior to the epoch of the chalk, descending thus in the series to the primary limestones, it ap- peared to me that a sketch taken from a portion of the labours of Dr. Ehrenberg might be not only useful, but especially ac- ceptable to such geologists as may not be conversant with the language of the original. I propose then, in the first instance, to advert briefly to the earlier researches of Dr. Ehrenberg concerning the Coral tribes in general, and those of the Red Sea in particular {; and in the second, to present such extracts from the Memoir, the title of which stands at the head of this paperS, as may answer the purpose of a general view. At the instigation of the Royal Academy of Sciences of Ber- lin ||, Dr. Ehrenberg and his friend, the late Dr. Hemprich, * Communicated by the Author. + With an Appendix touching the researches of M. Alcide d’Orbigny. + See in the Abhand. der Konig. Acad. d. Wissenschaften zu Berlin for the year 1832 :— 1. Contributions to the physiological knowledge of the Coral animals in general, and in particular of those of the Red Sea, with an attempt to clas- sify them according to their physiological distinctions; read 3rd March, 1831, with additions printed Ist Dec. 1833, pp. 225-880. 2. On the Nature and Structure of the Coral Banks of the Red Sea, read 22nd March 1832; revised and printed in Feb. 1834, pp. 381-482. § Ueber die Bildung der Kreidefelsen und des Kreidemergels durch un- sichtbare Organismen, in the Transactions of the Royal Academy of Sciences of Berlin, for the year 1838, read 20th Dec. 1858, and 18th Feb. 1839, pp: 59-149. || See the Report read to the Academy by M. Alr. von Humboldt on the Travels of Doctors Ehrenberg and Hemprich through Egypt, Dongola, Syria, Arabia, and the Eastern declivity of the highlands of Abyssinia, in the years 1820-1825, conveying a clear idea of the arduous and extraordinary la- bours of those gentlemen in all branches of Natural History: Berlin, 1826. Dr. Hemprich fell a sacrifice to his exertions in Abyssinia, on the 30th of June, 1825, on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 2¢ visited the Red Sea during a period of eighteen months, name~ ly, nine months from the year 1823 to 182: 4, and an equal number in 1825, having been nearly twelve months of the time on board ship, in which interval they passed over nearly the whole extent of that sea, saw many of its islands and coral banks, and landed with a view to special examination on forty- eight different points of the two coasts; but the whole number of islands and special points of the coast seen by them amounts to about 150, independently of the long coast of Sinai in Ara- bia, which they examined in continuity. In these laborious efforts, attended with extreme danger, they collected 110 spe- cies of Coral animals, being nearly three times as many as had been found or described by all former observers, namely, by Shaw, Forska! and Savigny, and later by Riippel. To determine the subjects of that collection with the greater precision, it became necessary to undertake a review of the whole class of the Coral animals, and the more so as Dr. Ehrenberg found that his own observations were frequently in collision with the systematic distinctions that have prevailed up to the present time. In this review the author has espe- cially compared the four most recent extensive systems, name- ly, of Schweigger in 1820, Rapp in 1829, Cuvier in 1830, and Blainville likewise in 1830, which may be said to embody the judgment of the present generation upon the labours of earlier periods, and to comprise the sum of existing knowledge in this department of natural history. He has in particular turned his attention to the work ot Blainville *, since it con- tains the greatest number of new details, having been enriched by the latest manuscript observations and drawings of Quoy and Gaimard, the result of their second voyage round the world with Capt. D’Urville. In these newer works, the la- bours of Lamarck having been critically employed, the author was relieved from the necessity of noticing them in a special manner. The attempt to reconcile the observed discrepancies led the author to separate the Coral animals into two organic natural groups, which are well marked and distinct from each other, and which he named Anthozoa (Flower-animals) and Bryozoa (Moss-animals). In the course of these researches the author found that the whole group of the Anthozoa, which consist of the proper (single-mouthed) coral animals, and which had been gradually distributed under more than 158 generic names, including even heterogeneous animals and plants, might, ac- cording to his own observations of their correspondence in * Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, 1830. Tribus I. 298 Mr. Weaver's View of Ehrenberg’s Observations affinity and relations of structure and development, be reduced to eighty-six genera, but which number might perhaps be still further diminished, as a few genera might be classed as sub- genera. The Anthozoa he has divided into two orders, 200- corallia (Animal-corals) and Phytocorallia (Plant-corals). In the Memoir is given a systematic description of the Orders, Tribes, Families, Genera and Species of the Anthozoa, while further details are reserved for the author’s work, entitled, Symbole Physica, The subjoined Table will show the general arrangement, extending to the genera. ANTHOZOA. Ore ventriculoque distinctis, tubo cibario anoque discreto nullis, corpore intus radiatim lamelloso. (Vibratio nulla, gemmez et spontanea divisio frequentissimz.) Orvo I.—Zoocoratiia. Corpore aut omnino molli, aut Cephalopodum more intus lapidem gene- rante (secernente nec excernente) hinc szepe omnino libera et, preter for- mam, animalium characteres omnes perfectius servantia. Species. ————— | Of the Red Sea. Ue ——_~-—_———_, b 8 $ : 3 = ol Genera. is ge 3 5 eel OPP cle ( 16 29 1. Actinia. 1 1 2. Metridium. =p : con 1 1 3. Megalactis. Familia I. Actinina. 1? nas ie 4. Thalassianthus. Genera 9. See eee ies lisa : A se 1 10 5. Cribrina. pecies living . 50. 1 3 6. hn cacan In the Red Sea 23. a! i ae pL OCR One a} anc Dey oy 7. Epicladia. a sfc Das |e ool 8. Heterodactyla. 8 aes vee | 3 9, Lucernaria. a F353 2 3 10. Hughea. < | Fam. Il. ZoanTHINA. 1 Bais 2 11. Zoanthus. s Genera 4. Fossil 2. 1 1 ete 4 12. Mammillifera. = Species living . 12. ses 2 3 13. Palythoa. 5 In the Red Sea 7. ane spons | es F. Siphonia. 3 50° F. Lymnorea. LN 500 a7 leer. F. 14. Fungia. Sot 1 5 See 15. Haliglossa. Fam. III. FUNGINA. ; Genera 6. Fossil 5. +5 Z ¢ F. sid Pied ea | Species living . 12. ek eee F 18. eens | Inthe Red Sea _ 3. hg of r. 19) Trochopal cee |e ES Diploctenium. Tribus Il. Tribus III. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 299 Species. ss S SS Of the Red Sea. ae > & S = = a 25 = = as ° See) ~ { Fam. IV. XENINA. 2 3 Genera 3. is Rebs 3 Species living . 7. a z I In the Red Sea 6. es Fam. V. TUBIPORINA. Genus 1. | Bats 2 Fes Species living . 3. “ar i In the Red Sea 1. z co: 1 1 s | Fam. VI. Hatcyonina. eae 5 12 Ss | Genera 6. ee 2 2 1 = Species living 28. ace 2 4 =| In the Red Sea 13 & ena ene = zee ] $ | Fam. VIE, PENNATULINA. ihe 4 ws | (a) Haviscerrra. i 1 Genera 4. J rss 1 | Species living . 7. fara l In the Red Sea 0. | po (8) HavreTeria. 2 Genera 3. Fossil 1. xs 3 Species living . 10. = hate { In the Red Sea 0. ae Fam. VIII. Hyprina. { {3 Genera 2. { 500 4 ' Species living . 6. ves ee 2 s In the Red Sea 0. L co | Fam. [X. TUBULARINA. ses 4 ro) Genera 4. 500 | 3 S j Species living . 12. mats 4 = In the Red Sea 0. HOC 1 S | Fam. X. SERTULARINA. | ( g Genus 1. 4 1? 4 N Species living . 4. ce L Inthe Red Sea 1. [ ZOOCORALLIA... 5 49 151 Fossil Genera. Genera. soe 20. Xenia. ae 21. Anthelia. 22. Rhizoxenia. 23. Tubipora. 24, Haleyonium. 25. Lobularia. 26. Ammothea. 27. Nephthya. 28. Sympodium. 29. Cliona. 30. Veretillum. 31. Pavonaria. 32. Umbellularia. 33. Scirpearia. ao8 34. Renilla. F.? | 35. Virgularia. 36. Pennatula. 37. Hydra. 38. Coryna. 39. Syncoryna. 40. Tubularia. 41. Eudendrium. 42. Pennaria. 43. Sertularia. 8 Tribus IV. Tribus V. Tribus VI. cc Se Tribus VII. (SSeS 300 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations Orvo I].—PuytocoraLitia. Corpore aut lapideam aut corneam materiam adglutinantem secernente, ac dorso (solea) excernente ejusque ope semper adnato (Ostrearum more), Familia XI. OCELLINA. Genera 14. Fossil 12. Species living 41. In the Red Sea 7. Fam. XII. DEDALINA. (a) ASTREINA. Genera 4. Fossil 3. Species living 28. In the Red Sea 15. Phytocorallia Polyactinia (8) MH ANDRINA. Genera 7. Fossil 6. Species living 28. In the Red Sea _ 5. Fam. XIII. MADREPORINA. Genera 3. Fossil 3. | aa = Specics living 41. zs In the Red Sea 24. 2 § ) Fam. XIV. MILLEPoRINA. — Genera 4. Fossil 2. re A | Species living 23. L In the Red Sea 11. Fam. XV. ISIDEA. Genera 4. Species living 10. S = Ss In the Red Sea 1. Sac Be Co Co os ~_—- =S oe Fam. XVI. GORGONINA. Genera 6. Fossil 1. Species living 63. In the Red Sea 3. ts] = ¢ | Fam. XVII. ALLOPORINA. Sac Genus 1. o+ . sos oes Species living = op In the Red Sea Z a o) PHYTOCORALLIA ...... LOOCORAUEULA Ts: «<05s5| AN DHOZOA wes taserieer Species. rr ee areas | Of the Red Sea. ee) 3 tb Fossil z oe £& | Genera. Be ete simi AD PEED As: Sy RSG oder ane 1 1 F. ape Abe 3 F. ads 1 9 F, ate ale 4 [de aie 3 8 F. Jerpagae ADE 6 F. Ana it a aks 1 4 F. pS 2 Tol climate 4 7 F. 8 14 F. F. 2 7 F. 2 12 F. ra 1 noe 1 4 F. 2 F. 2 F. 7 21 90 itr 20 F. ae F. 4 6 ans 2 7 le 3 10 50 1 ade 4 1 3 2 3 10 23 5A 1? 4 cae 12 F.? 11 1 61 235 27 ; 49 151 8 0 110 386 | 30 120 | Genera. . Desmophyllum. . Cyathina. . Stephanocora. - Monomyces. - Oculina. . Turbinaria. . Explanaria. - Cladocora. . Columnaria. . Strombodes. . Cyathophyllum. . Pterorrhiza. . Anthophyllum. . Stylina. . Caryophyllia. . Favia. . Astrea, . Favosites. . Meandrina. . Manicina. . Merulina. . Pavonia. . Agaricia. . Polyastra. . Monticularia. . Heteropora. . Madrepora. . Catenipora. Pleurodictyum. . Calamopora. . Seriatopora. . Millepora. . Pocillopora. . Corallium. . Melitza. . Mopsea. . Isis. . Prymnoa. . Muricea. . Eunicea. . Plexaura. . Gorgonia, . Pterogorgia. . Allopora, a — on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 301 In the preceding Table we see that of the forty-three genera of Zoocorallia, there are eight which are found fossil; the living species amount to 151, of which fifty-four exist in the Red Sea, and forty-nine of these have been observed by the author, five remaining unproved. Of the forty-three genera of Phytocorallia there are twenty-seven which are found fos- sil; the living species amount to 235, of which sixty-six exist in the Red Sea, and sixty-one of these have been observed by the author, five remaining unproved. ‘The general result is, that out of eighty-six genera of Anthozoa, thirty-five occur in the fossil state; and that of 386 known living species of An- thozoa, 120 exist in the Red Sea, of which 110 species were observed by the author. The same Table also shows that of the seventeen families of known Coral animals, thirteen exist in the Red Sea, while four are wholly wanting, namely, those of Pennatulina, Hydrina, Tubularina and Alloporina. The total number of known living species comprised in each family is also given, as well as the relative number actually existing in the Red Sea. The 120 species of Anthozoa existing in the Red Sea thus constitute nearly one third of the whole number of living spe- cies, and being comprised in forty-four genera, the latter rather exceed one half of the number of known living genera. Of the known living Corals there are eight genera peculiar to the Red Sea, namely, Megalactis, Thalassianthus?, Epi- cladia, Heterodactyla, Anthelia, Ammothea, Stephanocora and Strombodes. It appears also that eighty-eight species are pecu- liar to it, not having been hitherto observed anywhere else. Among the genera of the Red Sea that of Strombodes excites peculiar interest, having previously been found only in the fos- sil state. It affords a key to the structure of the remarkable Cyathophylla, differing from the view hitherto entertained, and rendering it quite clear that the internal central star of the encased forms is not a young one, but the oldest or mo- ther star, which is often surrounded by broad radiated mantle- folds productive of buds. It appears probable that the Red Sea and the part of the Mediterranean so nearly adjoining on the Libyan coast, pos- sess only two forms out of the 120 species in common, namely, Actinia Tapetum and A. Mesembryanthemum. Of the Bryozoa group, Dr. Ehrenberg gave in the same memoir, contained in the volume of the Transactions for 1832, only the more general results of his investigations, without en- tering into detail; but the subject is resumed in his later me- moir, inserted in the volume for 1838, in which he has pre- sented a tabular view of the Bryozoa, distributed into Orders, 302 Mr. Weaver’s View of Khrenberg’s Observations Families and Genera, with their characteristics. According to this view the Bryozoa comprise four Orders, Polythalamia, Gymnocore, Thallopodia and Scleropodia; the Polythalamia being divided into Monosomatia (single-bodied), consisting of fifty-six genera, and Polysomatia (many-bodied or polyparian), composed of twenty-two genera, forming altogether seventy- eight genera of Polythalamia. ‘The following ‘Table exhibits the general arrangement. Bryozoa. Animalia asphycta, tubo cibario simplici, sacciformi aut tubuliformi, vera corporis articulatione nulla aut sensim numerosiore, corporis forma gemmis aut novis articulis accedentibus sensim aucta, hinc indefinita, nunquam sponte dividua, omnia et singula verisimiliter periodice ovi- para, ideoque hermaphrodita. Orvo I.—PoLyTHALaMIA. Libere vagantia et loricata. Monosomatia. Familia I. Mirrorra. Genera 2. ? Miliola, ? Gromia. Familia II. Noposarrna. Gen. 11. Glandulina, Mucronina, Nodosaria, Ortho- cerina, Dentalina, Lingulina, Frondicularia, Rimulina, Vaginulina, Planularia, Marginu- lina. Familia III]. Texrurartia. Gen. 6. Bigenerina, ? Dimorphina, Textularia, Gram- mostomum (Vulvudaria), Polymorphina, Vir- gulina, Familia TV. Uvetcina. Gen. 11. Guttulina (et Globulina), Uvigerina, Bulimi- na, Valvulina, Rosalina, Clavulina, Globige- rina, Pyrulina, Sphzeroidina. Familia V. Rovratina. Gen. 22. Operculina, Soldania, Planorbulina, Rotalia, Trochulina, ? Spirulina, Calcarina, Pleuro- trema, Planulina, Discorbis ,Omphalophacus, ? Gyroidina, Truncatulina, Lenticulina, No- nionina, Cristellaria, Siderolina, Dendritina, Robulina, Anomalina, Saracenaria, Cassidu- lina. Familia VI. Prtcaritia. Gen. 6. Biloculina, Spiroloculina, Triloculina, Arti- culina, Quinqueloculina, Adelosina. Polysomatia. Familia. VII. Astrroptscrna. Gen. 5. Asterodiscus, Lunulites, Orbitulites, Cupu- laria, Flustrella. Familia VIII. Soritrna. Gen. 2. Sorites, Amphisorus. Familia IX. FRUMENTARINA. Gen. 3. ? Dactylopora, ? Ovulites, ? Polytripe. Familia X, HeEttcosorra. Gen. 5. Peneroplis, Pavonina, Vertebralina, Orbicu- lina, ? Heterostegina. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 303 Familia XI. HeticorrocHina. Gen, 3. Polystomella, ? Amphistegina, ? Geoponus, Familia XII. ALvEoLinea. Gen. 2. Melonia, Alveolina. Familia XIII. Fasurarina. Gen. 2. Fabularia, Coscinospira. Orvo II.—Gymnocorz. Libere vagantes, nudz. Familia I. CrisTATELLINA. Gen. 2. Cristatella, Zoobotryon. Orpo I[IJ].—Tuattoropia. Stolonibus thallove membranaceo affixa, incrustantia nec adnata, sed loricata. Familia I. Hatcyone tea. Gen. 8. Halcyonella, Vesicularia, Bowerbankia, Far- rella (= Lagenella) *, Valkeria, Stephani- dium, n. G., Dynamene, Halodactylus (= Alcyonidium). Familia If. Cornutarina. Gen. 1. ? Cornularia. Familia III. Escuarina. Gen. 5. Eschara, Melicertina (= WMelicerita) +, Crisia, Acamarchis, Notamia. Familia IV. CrLierorina. Gen. 5. Cellepora, Flustra, Membranipora, Briolo- phus, n. G., Apsendesia. Familia V. AvLoporINa. Gen. 1. Tubulipora. Orvo IV.—Scteroropia. Stolonibus destituta, excreto fulcro axique anorganicis firmiter affixa eisque fruticulosa. Familia I. Myrrioporina. Gen. 9. Hornera, Idmonea, Retipora, Distichopora, Myriopora, Tilesia, Cricopora, Ceriopora, Spiropora. Familia I]. ? ANTIPATHINA. Gen. 1. Antipathes. “The two last orders, the Thallopodia and Scleropodia,” the author observes, ‘‘are considerably richer in forms, and it would be very easy by an uncritical compilation to enlarge greatly the number of names; but such confusion has been produced in names by Lamouroux and later writers, the same body being often designated by many new names, that I shall not venture to extend my judgment further at present. What * The name Lagenella was appropriated to an infusorial form in 1832. + Melicerta is already employed among the Radiaria, Melicertum with the Acalepha, Melicerita is not correct in ‘language. Perhaps hereafter it may be advisable to substitute Textilaria for Tex- tularia, Polystomatium for Polystomella, Cyclodiscus for Discorbis, &c. 304. Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations has been advanced will suffice to show clearly the position of the Polythalamia, such as it appears to me, in the animal kingdom.” On Chalk and Chalk Marl. The memoir on the chalk and chalk marl is distributed under the following heads :— 1. Historical Introduction, pp. 59—68. 2. New method of observing, pp. 68—70. 3. On calcareous-shelled organisms, invisible to the naked eye, as the principal constituents of writing-chalk, pp. 70—74. 4. On Chalk Marl and its relations to Chalk, and to the Flints of the Chalk, pp. 74—87. 5. On the compact limestone of Upper Egypt and Arabia, as formed by the Polythalamian calcareous animalcules of the White Chalk of Europe, pp. 87—90. 6. On the principal organic calcareous forms which con- stitute all chalk, and the local differences, pp. 90—95. 7. Preliminary view of new researches respecting living Polythalamia, and their relation to the formation of the sand of Sea Downs, pp. 96—106. 8. Application of the preceding observations to the system- atic distinctions of Polythalamia, with a tabular view of the Bryozoa, according to their orders, families and genera, with their characteristics, pp. 107—121. (N.B. Of this tabular view I have given a transcript above.) 9. On the geographical distribution of living Polythalamia on the African and Asiatic coasts of the Mediterranean, and in the Red Sea, with a tabular view of the genera and species, pp. 121—127. 10. A concise Diagnosis of the new families, genera and species, 1. Of the siliceous Infusoria of the chalk marl, con- taining thirty-one new species, of which seventeen species belong to five new genera, and fourteen species to five former-known genera, pp. 128—130. 2. Of the calcareous-shelled Polythalamian animalcules of the chalk and sea sand, sixty-seven new species, beside two new species from the Jura (Oolite) lime- stone, pp. 130—135. 11. A summary view of the conclusions drawn from the preceding expositions, pp. 135—139. 12. Explanation of the Plates, pp. 140—147. 13. A tabular view of the organic bodies invisible to the naked eye, which form the chief constituents of chalk, chalk marl, the compact limestone of Egypt and Arabia, and the nummulitic limestone of the Pyramids of Geza or Gyzeh. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 305 The reader being thus put in possession of the general scope of the work, I now proceed to exhibit in full the conclusions to which the author has been led (as indicated under the head of No. 11), to which I shall subjoin further extracts taken from different portions of the Memoir, for the purpose of general illustration. Conclusions. 1. Many, and probably all, White Chalk Rocks are the pro- duce of microscopic coral-animalcules, which are mostly quite invisible to the naked eye, possessing calcareous shells of 51, to 54, line in magnitude, and of which much more than one million are well preserved in each cubic inch, that is, much more than ten millions in one pound of chalk *. 2. The Chalk Marls of the Mediterranean Basin are the produce of microscopic Infusoria possessing siliceous shells or cases, mostly quite invisible to the naked eye, intermingled with a small proportion of the calcareous animalcules of the chalk. 3. The peculiar state of aggregation in White Chalk does not arise from a precipitate of lime previously held in solution in the water of the sea, nor is it the result of the accumulation of the small animalcules, but it proceeds from a disintegration of the assembled microscopic organisms into much minuter inorganic calcareous particles; the reunion of which into re- gular, elliptical, granular lamine, is caused by a peculiar cry- stalloid process, which may be compared to crystallization, but is of a coarser nature, and essentially different from it. The best writing chalk is that in which this process has been deve- loped to the greatest extent. 4. The compact limestone rocks also which bound the Nile in the whole of Upper Egypt and extend far into the Sahara or Desert, being neither white nor of a staining quality, as well as the West Asiatic compact limestone rocks in the north of Arabia, are, in the mass, composed of the coral animalcules of the European chalk. ‘This affords a new insight into the ancient history of the formation of Libya from Syene to the * Tt is to be understood that I speak only of such Polythalamia as are well preserved, wholly disregarding their fragments. Of the well-preserved there are contained in one fourth part of a cubic line, or in one twelfth of a grain of chalk, frequently 150 to 200 in number, equal to 600-800 in each cubic line, or 1800-2400 in each grain, and from 1,036,000 to 1,382,400 in each cubic inch ; and hence in one pound of chalk the num- ber far exceeds ten millions. The larger Polythalamia and Bryozoa of the chalk are best obtained from the sediment produced by brushing the chalk under water; the entirely microscopic forms remain long suspended in water. : Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. x 306 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations Atlas, and of Arabia from Sinai to Lebanon, thus opening a large field to organic distribution. 5. Many of the chalk-like formations bordering on the Me- diterranean in Sicily, Barbary and Greece, really belong to the period of the European chalk formation, as proved by their organic contents, although commonly held to be differ- ent from the chalk, and considered as tertiary *. 6. The chalk beds of the South of Europe, around the ba- sin of the Mediterranean, are distinguished from those of the north and east of Europe by numerous well-preserved chalk animalcules, and less numerous inorganic laminz; while in the north and east of Europe these relations are reversed +. 7. In the South of Europe the beds of marl which alternate with the chalk consist of siliceous shells of Infusoria, and flints are wanting; while in the North of Europe beds of flint al- ternate with the chalk, and marls with Infusoria are wanting. This exchange of character tends to explain the peculiar re- lation of flint to chalk, indicating that the pulverulent sili- ceous particles of Infusoria have been converted into compact nodules of flint. 8. It has been lately remarked that the chalk which con- tains flints is deficient in numerous siliceous Infusoria, when compared with the Bilin slaty Tripel or polishing slate (Po- lirschiefer) containing semi-opal; but this deficiency now dis- appears, and a rich substitute takes its place, the Infusoria in the North of Europe having been employed in the formation of flints; while in the south, remaining unchanged, they are preserved in the Infusoria marls. 9. The chalk animalcules resemble most those of the sea- sand and the Miliolites, which, up to the present day, have been ranged among the Mollusks with the Cephalopods; but neither of these are either Cephalopods or Mollusks, nor even Infusoria (as asserted by a late observer); but they are Bry- ozoa, animals of Moss-corals, which are most nearly related to Flustra and Eschara. 10. ‘The sea downs of some, and probably of most coasts, are still in course of formation by living Bryozoa, which, though very small, resembling grains of sand, are yet, for the most part, larger than the chalk animalcules, and a large pro- * In Sicily, however, there occur many breccias of chalk, which have suffered a subsequent change, and may be referred to the tertiary epoch. ¢ Thus in the white and yellow soft writing chalk of the North of Europe the inorganic crystalloid portions sometimes equal or rather exceed in mass the organic remains; but in the South of Europe, in Sicily, these organisms with their fragments are greatly predominant, consisting, as it appears, ex- clusively of well-preserved Polythalamia. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 307 portion of the sand ot the Libyan Desert has been proved to consist of such grains. It is only in Nubia above Syene that the desert sand becomes a pure detritus of granite *. 11. In the variouscountries of the earth in which occur white and earthy, as well as coloured and compact rocks, composed of microscopic calcareous animalcules, the genera and species of these animalcules present so striking an agreement with those of the white chalk of Riigen, that they may well be deemed characteristic of one and the same period of geolo- gical formation. It cannot be asserted for a certainty that the same forms have been observed any where elset. 12. In the beds subjacent to and more ancient than the chalk, namely, in those of the Oolite or Jura limestone for- mation, we have also clear evidence of the existence of other microscopic Polythalamia. ‘These, however, are such as have not hitherto been found anywhere in the chalk. 13. The early assertion that al/ limestone was the produce of animals}, though resting on no sufficient foundation, and therefore justly held in slight regard by modern geologists, yet now deserves every attention, since it clearly appears that a limestone formation widely extended on the surface of the earth is composed of microscopic animals, visibly converted in a gradual manner into inorganic chalk and compact lime- stone. If similar phenomena appear also in the Jura lime- stone formation, and should become still further confirmed, these considerations (combined with the long-known existence of coarser corals and shells in both formations) tend to show how necessary it is, when examining the composition of any con- siderable portion of the solid mass of the earth, to strengthen our natural senses by artificial means, in order to obtain a di- stinct knowledge of the extent to which organic life may have contributed to its production. 14. The extreme minuteness of the chalk animalcules is stri- kingly proved by this, that even in the finest levigated whiting multitudes of them are still present, and may be applied with- out suffering change to the most varied technical purposes. Thus in the chalk coating given to painted chambers, paper, or even glazed visiting-cards (when not coated with white lead * On these very interesting and not easily developed relations, I hope, at a future day, to be able to make a more special communication. + If I have applied the same name in some cases both to animalcules of the chalk and to forms existing in the present sea-sand, or in recent fossil beds, it has arisen partly from my being unacquainted with the original forms of the latter, and partly from my desire not to create unnecessary perplex- ity by the adoption of new names. It should be observed that they are di- stinguished by marks of interrogation. All those which I could really com- pare were different. t By Linneeus in 1745 and 1748, and Buffon in 1749. X 2 308 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations alone), may be seen a pretty mosaic of well-preserved, moss- coral animalcules, but which are invisible to the naked eye. And thus our natural vision receives from such a surface the impression of the purest white, little deeming that it contains the bodies of millions of self-existing beings, of varied and beautiful forms, more or less closely crowded together (as in Plate IV., where the subjects are magnified 300 times). Explanation of the Plates and Tabular View. The Memoir is accompanied by four Plates*, presented with the view of facilitating a comparison between the organic re- lations of minute fossil bodies invisible to the naked eye, and those of still living bodies visible to the naked eye. Thus the first three Plates exhibit recent small bodies natu- rally visible, with which the naturally invisible forms of the fourth Plate may be readily associated. The first three Plates serve also to elucidate the true nature of the Polythalamia (hitherto mistaken), showing their greater affinity to the Bryozoa (Flustra) than to all other animal forms, and in particular the great difference there is between them and Cephalopods and Infusoria. ‘They represent partly the unfolded, soft, external parts of living subjects, and partly dead, naked bodies, artificially divested of their calcareous shell, and not hitherto figured. Lastly, these first three Plates serve to convey a view, ac- cording to some of their principal divisions, of the structure of the whole group of forms occurring in Polythalamia, and in particular to illustrate their frequent assemblage in families, or Polyparies, as they are termed. Plate I. contains simple forms; Plates II. and III. composite or family forms, Poly- paries; of which Plate II. contains family forms assembled in single rows, and Plate ITI. family forms arranged in many rows. If, as already observed, we examine a wall or paper whitened with finely levigated chalk, or a glazed visiting-card not coated with white lead alone, but also with chalk, they would appear, when magnified 300 times, more or less rich in subjects, as represented in Plate IV. Plate I. contains simple recent Polythalamia from the sea- sand of Rimini. Fig. 1. Rotalia Beccarii; the shell only was known, but the figures show also the form of the animal when deprived of its shell by an acid, the form of both being the same. Fig. 2. Marginulina Raphanus (Nodosaria Raphanus, Nautilus diaphanus priorum), also very common at Rimini and other Italian coasts, and which had hitherto been errone- ously ranked with Orthocera. Plate II. contains Polyparies of recent Polythalamia assem- * These plates do not accompany Mr. Weaver’s paper. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 309 dled in single rows, from the Red Sea and the Mediterranean. The two subjects represented in this Plate were collected by me in the year 1823, and it is peculiarly interesting, through my newly-discovered method of observing*, to have been able to see in several divisions of the internal body the remains of the siliceous Infusoria, of which they had made a repast fifteen years before. Fig. 1. Peneroplis planatus, d Or- bigny, Nautilus planatus of Fichtel and Moll, from the Red Sea. The shells of this animalcule were hitherto only known, but the soft organic animal form which they inclose is liere also represented. Fig. 2. Coscinospira Hemprichiz, a form from the Red Sea, also found in the Libyan part of the Mediter- ranean, and which was formerly erroneously placed adjoining the Spzrula of the Cephalopods, and more recently as con- nected, through Lituolites nautiloides, with Spirolina. Plate II]. contains Polyparies of recent Polythalamia assem- bled in many rows. ‘This Plate contains the only living ani- malcule of the Polythalamia group, hitherto so far observed as to admit of its classification. The three forms given in this Plate, constructed of raany rows of animalcules, may be distinctly associated with the Flustra and Eschara of the Bryozoa, to which, through the well-known Zunulites and Orbitulites (hitherto ranked with coral animals), they approxi- mate in a convincing manner. Fig. 1. Orbiculus numismalis, from the sea-sand of the Antilles Isles. Fig. 2. Sorites or- Siculus = Nautilus orbiculus, Forskal, Nummulina (Assilina) nitida, dOrbigny,? from the Red Sea. The same species lives also in the Mediterranean. In a part magnified 300 times we see the animalcule with eight feelers protruding from its cell. In some of the cells may be seen distinct shells of siliceous Infusoria; in others appear oviform globules. Fig. 3. Amphisorus Hemprichii closely resembles the Sorites; but it has cells on both sides bearing single animalcules, and hence * The new method of observing is the following :—Place a drop of water upon a lamina of mica, and put into it of scraped chalk as much as will cover the fine point of a knife, spreading it out and leaving it to rest a few seconds; then withdraw the finest particles which are suspended in the water, together with most of the water, and let the remainder become per- fectly dry. Cover this remainder so spread out with Canadian balsam, the turpentine of the Pinus (Abies) balsamea, and hold it over a lamp until it becomes slightly fluid without froth. A preparation thus made seldom fails, and when magnified 300 times in diameter we see that the mass cf the chalk is chiefly composed of minute well-preserved organisms. In this preparation all the cells of the Polythalamia appear at first black with a white central spot, which is caused by the air contained in the cells, which, as is well known, appear under water as annular black bodies; but by de- grees the balsam penetrates into all the single cells, the black rings of the air vesicles disappear, and we recognize all the small cells of the Polytha- lamian animals, often presenting a very pretty appearance. 310 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations the dises are twice as thick as in Sorites. If we compare So- rites with Flustra, we may place Amphisorus by the side of Eschara, but, being both free moving bodies, they are different from them. Plate IV. contains the znvisible animalcules of the chalk and chalk marl, displayed in twelve specimens of rock; 1 to 9 being portions from the chalk, and 10 to 12 from the chalk marl, magnified 300 times. In these specimens the calcare- ous Polythalamia amount to sixteen species, and the siliceous Infusoria to twelve species, with siliceous spicula of sponges. The twelve localities from which these specimens of the rock masses were derived are the following:— No. 1 to 5, writing chalk; namely, 1. from Puszkary, in Poland, opposite Grod- no, from the shore of the Memel; 2. from Jutland, in Den- mark; 3. from the island of Rugen in Pomerania; 4. from Gravesend, on the Thames; 5. from Meudon, near Paris; Jjirmer writing chalk, No. 6, from Cattolica in Sicily; com-_ pact, not writing chalk, No. 7, from the Mokattum hills near Cairo; and No. 8, from the Catacombs of Thebes in Upper Egypt; compact gray limestone, No. 9, from the mountain mass of Hamam Faraiin in Sinai, Arabia; chalk marl, No. 10, from Oran in Africa; No. 11, from Caltasinetta in Sicily ; No. 12, from Greece. In the general table indicated above, under the head of No. 13 of the contents of the memoir, a list is given of the princi- pal forms of the invisible organic bodies which constitute the rocks from which the twelve above-mentioned specimens were taken, as well as the chalk of Brighton, the chalk marl of Zante in the Ionian Islands, and the nummulite limestone of the Pyramids of Geza in Egypt. From this it results that the principal forms in these rocks consist of twenty-five spe- cies of calcareous-shelled Polythalamia, thirty-nine species of siliceous-shelled Infusoria, seven species of soft-shelled Infu- soria of the flints, and five species of siliceous plants. The twenty-five species of calcareous-shelled Polythalamia, belonging to eight genera, are the following :— Flustrella concentrica; Globigerina bulloides ?, G. helicina?; Planulina sicula, P. *turgida; Robulina cretacea; Rosalina *foveolata, R. globularis?, R. *levigata, R. pertusa; Rotalia *olobulosa, R. ocellata, R. ornata, R. perforata, R. scabra, R. stigma; Textularia aciculata?, T. *aspera, T. brevis, T. *dilatuta, T. *globulosa, T. perforata, 'T. spinosa, 'T. *striata ; Turbinulina ¢talica? Quinqueloculina? from Benisuef, is doubtful. N.B. Textularia globulosa, when in fragments, is not easily distinguished from Rofalia globulosa; and in like manner the fragments of Textularia perforata may be con- founded with Rotalia perforata. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 311 The thirty-nine species of siliceous-shelled Infusoria belong to fourteen genera, and are as follow :— Actinocyclus ternarius, A. *quaternarius, A. *quinarius, A. senarius, A. septenarius, A. octonarius, A. denarius; Coccone- ma Crete; Cornutella clathrata; Coscinodiscus Argus, C. centralis, C. lineatus, C. *minor, C. *Patina; Denticella Fra- gilaria, D. tridens; Dictyocha Fibula, D. Navicula, D. poly- actis, D. speculum, D. stella, D. triangula; Eunotia zebra; Fragilaria rhabdosoma, F. striolata?; Gallionella aurichalca ?, G. sulcata; Haliomma Medusa, H. crenatum; Lithocampe lineata, L. Radicula, L. solitaria; Navicula africana, N. Ba- cillum, N. eurysoma, N. ventricosa, N. sicula; Pyxidicula prisca; Synedra ulna. The seven species of soft-shelled Infusoria of the flints be- long to three genera, and are the following: —Chzetophyta Pyrite; Peridinium pyrophorum+; Xanthidium bulbosum, X. Surcatum, X. hirsutum, X. ramosum, X. tubiferum. The five species of siliceous plants belong to two genera, namely, Spongia (Tethya?) aciculosa, S. cancellata, 8. *Cri- brum, S. binodis; Spongilla ( Tethya ?) lacustris}. Of these principal forms the before-mentioned rocks partake in the proportions as stated below: namely, Species of Species of Infusoria. Species of pouychalarnia: | Silicoaie omanenedthie spice in Chalk, | in Flints. The Chalk of H Puszkary contains ......... 6 | Riven eet -as oot nce ah 7 1 Mrblanel) hope acide dae: f6 cade 6 Gravesend. 2sass7ceses <2 0 6 3 5 Brichfert..235c.003s,.05--%> 7 ] 4 Ly PSP Pe A See er OG AL” bee 2, RO ONG atest snp os, doses 9 The Chalk Marl of Siliceous Infusoria. Caltasinetta ......... saree 7 C7 AREA ace 4 rarity taste anes e cane sesene 2 [fe NRPS he Se 1 WAANMEE 582s vals ds osioa vole ese 5 Sor aiig eect 2 (Ae oe ne acer aoe 3 EO as Boab 1 The Compact Chalk of Byte see deale bens oa sioae 8 | Je\rre | VE eke se anpoocoUbSeEUcOOne 6 | The Nummulite Limestone o Containing 4 species of Num- The Pyramids of Geza ... 6 ; mulite, the largest of wey is one inch in diameter. a eS ee = + Peridinium delitiense has hitherto been found only in flint pebbles near Delitzsch, yet accompanied with forms that are common in the flints of the chalk. ; : ; ey! + In the preceding lists, the species which are marked with an asterisk are those which most frequently occur, forming the masses of the rocks. The Rotalia globulosa occurs in all the localities. 312 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations On the Chalk Marl, and its relations to the Chalk and its Flints. The whole coast of Oran in Africa appears to belong to the chalk formation, composing the plain east of the town, and extending thence to the Atlas. The marl brought from thence as tertiary by M. Rozet in great quantities I had an opportunity of examining in Paris, and I found not only Po- lirschiefer and an Infusoria conglomerate, but calcareous ani- malcules of the same species as occur in the chalk of Poland, Riigen, Denmark, and Paris, and which there mainly contri- bute to its mass. It thus appeared that the so-called tertiary formation of the coast of Barbary might, without much hazard, be brought into a nearer connexion with the chalk. In his description of this tract, M. Rozet states*, ‘* The tertiary formation is extensively developed in Oran, forming the soil of the large plain on the east of the town, and on the south to the Atlas. It forms also the sea-coast to an extent of 3000 metres between Mers el Kebir and Cape Falcon, and the whole soil of the adjacent plain. The lower bed is a blue marl, like that which we found at Algiers and within the Atlas. It appears destitute of organic remains. ‘The second or upper deposit consists of marly and calcareous beds in alternation, forming a thickness of 30 to 40 metres. In the plain these beds are apparently horizontal, as well as in the elevated plain of the Rammra hill; but in the hills south-west of the town of Kasba they are, on an extent of two hours march, inclined to the north, at an angle sometimes exceeding 30°. ‘The beds of limestone are white and chalk-like, yellowish and coarse granular, usually forming the lower part, succeeded by others alternating with yellow marls, which are often slaty and charged with sand, and between them are found layers of ostreze and other shells. Among them two beds are distin- guished, each one metre in thickness, composed of very white finely-laminated marl, containing numerous well-preserved impressions of fishes, so that in a cubic mass of one foot we seldom fail to find three or four fishes. In these beds of marl thus enclosing the fishes, other organic remains do not appear ; but in the calcareous and sandy beds which intervene, occur layers of large oysters mingled with gryphez. The upper part of this deposit is composed of a calcareous breccia, which is exhibited at the surface in the soil of the whole plain on the south-west of Oran.” This exact description of the position and thickness of the white marl with impressions of fishes, has a reference to the * Rozet, Voyage dans la Régence d Alger, Paris, 1833. tome 1. chap. v. pp. 56, 63. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 313 Infusoria conglomerate of Oran, to which I have already ad- verted. It is probably what formed the Tripel of the earlier periods of Italy. When M. Rozet speaks (at p. 28-30) of the great extent of the tertiary tract near Algiers as similar in its relations to those of Oran, I cannot agree with him. On the contrary, forming my judgment by the organic remains, I consider the desert tract near Algiers as really composed of a tertiary formation, which reposes on chalk. This opinion is founded on my observation, that the tract in Libya, extend- ing from Alexandria to Siwa, is composed of tertiary beds, while from Cairo to Geza the chalk formation occurs, which terminates at the granite of Syene, but is far spread into the Desert. The valley of Siwa appears to form the northern boundary of the chalk in Eastern Libya. In the South of Italy, at Caltasinetta and its neighbourhood, the relations had been correctly seized by our late friend Frederick Hoffmann, from whose diary | have been favoured with an extract by M. von Dechen. He represents the series of strata which occupy the greater part of Sicily as composed of limestones, sandstones, clays, and marls; the lower mem- bers being probably referable to the Jura formation, suc- ceeded by such as clearly belong to the chalk, and many beds of which perfectly resemble the hard chalk of the north-west of Germany (Teutoburger Wald). Among the marls are white chalk-like thinly laminated masses, analogous to Tri- pel, designated by Hoffmann as white chalk marl, and which especially occur in the southern part of the island. ‘The beds of the chalk formation usually dip Z0° to 30°, while the strike is nearly constant, from 15° to 45° S. of E. and N. of W., parallel to the south coast. ‘The tertiary beds which succeed the chalk are composed of loose sand, friable sandstone, tes- taceous breccias, clays and limestones. ‘They cover the chalk unconformably, resting on the truncated edges of the latter. The chalk beds are upon the whole poor in organic remains, and these are seldom distinct; there occur Hippurites, Num- mulites, Lenticulites, and in a few piaces indistinct Ammo- nites and Belemnites, while the tertiary beds are quite filled with innumerable Mollusks, of which nine-tenths are still li- ving in the Mediterranean. ‘This distinction is so striking that it scarcely required the difference of relative position in order to draw a correct line between the two formations. Even had so circumspect a geologist as Frederick Hoffmann not cor- rectly seized and pronounced with decision on these local relations, the numerous microscopic siliceous Infusoria with calcareous Polythalamia which [ have found in the chalk mar! would have led to the same conclusion. 314 Ehrenberg on the Organic Composition of Chalk. If we compare Hoffmann’s description of this portion of Sicily with that given by Rozet of the coast near Oran, we cannot avoid recognizing a similarity of relations; and the thinly laminated marly beds with impressions of fishes, between Caltasinetta and Castrogiovanni, which Hoffmann refers with certainty to the chalk formation, correspond to the similar beds which occur near Oran, but which were said to be tertiary. And the parallel is confirmed by the micro- scopic siliceous Infusoria and calcareous animalcules which I have discovered in both. The genera and species of the siliceous Infusoria in Sicily are so similar to those of Oran and Zante, that of thirty-six species, four occur in all the three countries, three in Cal- tasinetta and Zante, seven in Caltasinetta and Oran, while in all of them the Coscinodiscus Patina is greatly predominant. Of all these siliceous animals, not a single species has been found in the chalk of the North of Europe, nor even in the flints. On the other hand, the calcareous-shelled animalcules, which in the South of Europe accompany the siliceous ani- mals, comprise about one half of the same species that are found in the North, yet exceeding them in quantity. From the examination of the organic constituents of the chalk marl we learn the hitherto unknown fact, that nume- rous swarms of microscopic Infusoria were in existence within the period of the secondary formation of the earth’s surface, chiefly belonging to such as possess siliceous cases or shells, and which for the greater part are members of such sections of the Bacillaria family as had previously appeared to be con- fined to the tertiary or newest formations. Of the thirty-nine or forty species of siliceous Infusoria occurring in the chalk formation, thirty-four or thirty-five have not hitherto been found in the recent state; but it is re- markable that the remaining five or six species so closely resemble existing species of the present day, that they present no peculiar character by which they could be distinguished from them, and hence the application of new names appeared inadmissible. They are, Eunotia zebra, Fragilaria rhab- dosoma, F. striolata ?, Gallionella aurichalca, Navicula ventri- cosa, Synedra ulna*. In the chalk itself only four out of the thirty-nine or forty * The indifference shown to climate by Infusoria, and the peculiarity of — their organic development, seem to render it possible that they might be more readily preserved through many catastrophes of the earth than other forms. By the faculty which they possess of spontaneous division, a single individual can, under very favourable circumstances, be multiplied in the course of a few hours to the extent of millions. Mr. A. White’s Description of a South American Wasp. 315 species of siliceous Infusoria have hitherto been met with, namely, Fragilaria rhabdosoma, Fragilaria striolata ?, Gallio- nella aurichalca, and Pyxidicula prisca, They are very rare, and found only in the vicinity of the beds of flint. [To be continued. ] XXXVI.—Description of a South American Wasp which col- lects Honey. By Mr. ApAm Wuires, M.E.S.; an Assistant in the Zoological Department of the British Museum. [With a Plate. ] Some of the Wasp tribe of the New World form their nests of a solid and rather thick pasteboard. Such structures have been met with in Pennsylvania*, while they occur frequently in the more tropical parts of South America as far as Buenos Ayrest, and very probably much to the south of that point: in the description of the Isthmus of Darien t, Wafer mentions “the bird’s nest bee, the hives of which are black and hard, hanging from the trees like birds’ nests.” The best known is that of the Chartergus nidulans §, which is formed “ofa beautifully polished white and solid pasteboard, impenetrable by the weather||.”” It has been fully described by Reaumur in the sixth volume of his ‘ Mémoires’: in the British Museum there are two specimens of this nest. They are securely attached to the branch of a tree by their upper end, and vary much in length, from a few inches, as in the Museum specimens, to two feet or evenmore. In the former case they are more or less round and have but four or five combs, while in the latter they are of a long cylindrical shape, and have a * Rymsdyk, Mus. Britannicum, tab. 1. f. 2. + Mr. Cuming tells me he has seen specimens there, at least four feet long: in a deserted one a swallow had built her nest. t Voyage and Description of the Isthmus of America (1704), p. 214. § The Vespa nidulans, Fab., is figured by Coquebert (Ill. Icon. tab. 6. fiz. 3.), and Guerin (Iconogr. pl. 72. fig. 7.). In Saint Fargeau’s ‘ Hist. Nat. des Hymenopt.’ i. p. 546, it constitutes, along with another black species, the genus Chartergus ; I believe it is the type of Latreille’s Epipone. Cuvier (Bull. des Sc.) seems to have first pointed out, in 1797, the error into which Reaumur fell, of considering a Chalcididous parasite found in these nests as being the constructors of them, He regarded it as the Chalcis annulata of Fabricius, an insect found in the pupe of nocturnal Lepidoptera. In 1798 Fabricius described the insect as Chalcis conica (Suppl. Ent. Syst. 242), having obtained specimens from the nest : the name he afterwards altered to pyramidea (Syst. Piez. 167), as his former specific name was pre-occupied. Mr. Sells has recently found the parasite in the nest (Journal of the Pro- ceedings of Entomol. Society, ii. p. 30), and Mr. Westwood has published a more accurate figure than that given by Reaumur (Ent. Soc. Trans., ii. pl. 20. f. 6.). || Kirby and Spence, Introd. 1. p. 506, 316 Mr. A. White’s Description of a corresponding number of partitions ; additional combs are added to the lower part as the occupants increase in number. These combs are horizontal, convex on the under side, and fixed to the walls of the nest by their whole circumference. The cells are hexagonal and open downwards, as in most other nests constructed by the Vespide. Each of the combs has a hole near the middle, through which access is obtained to the uppermost apartments. The outer entrance is by a small round orifice near the middle of the under side, which is more or less funnel-shaped. In the Museum there is a nest from the West Indies of a greyish brown colour; it is bell-shaped, and attached to the branch of a tree in the same way as the other. The base, however, is flat, the entrance being by a small hole close to the edge: each stage of combs has a similarly situated orifice to give’ access to the variovs compartments. There are five straight horizontal partitions, fixed, as in the preceding, by their entire circumference; on the lowest there are no indica- tions of cells, on the fourth there 1s a circular cell unfinished, while in the three upper combs the hexagonal cells are con- fined to the middle. The texture of this nest is coarse, the fibres on the surface and throughout being distinctly visible. It is seven and a half inches long, the base where its diameter is greatest having nearly the same dimensions. This nest closely agrees with one from Cayenne figured by Cuvier*; the constructor is a small Vespidous insect of a shining black colour, with brown wings and a pedicellate abdomen, which the French naturalist has named- Vespa Tatuat, from its local name “La Mouche Tatou.” Bur- meister} says this insect forms a nest, having “ the superior surface covered with a multitude of conical knobs ;” in Cu- vier’s figure it is perfectly smooth. The insects which form these curious habitations have been observed by Lacordaire§ in their native country. Their so- cieties are not dissolved each year, as happens with the wasps of our climates, which, on the approach of cold weather, are nearly all cut off. The nests are found in copse-wood, principally near plan- tations (at least in Guiana), and are generally suspended at a height of three or four feet from the ground. During the rainy season, from January to the middle of June, only perfect * Bull. des Se. par la Soc. Phil., n. 8. + The Polistes morio of Fabricius, who describes the nest from Cuvier’s communication. It is the Lpipona Tatua of Saint Fargeau. + Man. of Ent., transl. by Shuckard, § 296. p. 523. § Introd. a1’Entom., ii. p. 508. South American Wasp which collects Honey. 317 nests are to be met with; in January and February the cells are in great measure filled with larvae; in March and April these decrease in number, and by the end of May scarcely any are to be found. These are thought to turn into females, which, not finding room in their old nursery, emigrate and form new colonies, as when the fine season returns, which is about the middle of June, nests are to be found in progress ; but instead of only one female being at work, as is the case with our wasps, Lacordaire has observed as many as a dozen busily engaged in constructing their new abode. As soon as a series of cells is completed larvee may be found in them, and the nest is gradually increased by the addition of new combs. In September the structure is half finished, and towards the end of November it is most frequently completed. The old nests of the preceding year continue peopled as before, but new larvee were only observed in them in abundance in Sep- tember or October ; these are believed to turn into neuters: if this is the case, the reverse takes place with the European wasps, the neuters of which are first excluded. Mr. Walter Hawkins has presented to the collection of the British Museum a pasteboard nest from the banks of the Rio Yancay (Uruguay.?), which differs very materially from both the structures I have alluded to above. It seems to be of the same description as the fabric referred to by Burmeister,—by Westwood* as existing in the Berlin Museum, and appears to me to be identical with the nest of the “ Chiguana” wasp referred to by Azarat. As the accompanying figs., 1 and 2, drawn by Mr. Dinkel, give its shape and general appearance better than any de- scription could do, it is only necessary to say, that, viewed sideways, it is of an oblong form, rounded at the base. The orifices at the side, near the bottom, bulge out considerably. When viewed from beneath it is somewhat ovate. It is very generally covered with conical knobs of various shapes, nearly all of which are more or less rubbed at the end, but in some places, less exposed, they are pointed, and in many in- stances nearly three-quarters of an inch long. At the very top, and on the side above the entrance, there are but few of these projections; in two or three places the surface is very distinctly contracted, and in the concavities there are no pro- jecting points; the knobs seem to run in irregular, generally transverse, ridges. The entrances, as may be seen in fig. 2, are artfully protected by pent roofs from the weather, which, in the rainy season, is * Introd. to Mod. Classif., ii. p. 251. + Voyages dans l’Amér. Mérid., i. p. 171. 318 Mr. A. White’s Description of a sometimes very violent ; they are also so intricately twisted, as to prevent the ingress of any moth or other enemy, at least of any size. The hardness of the whole mass must tend very much to protect its constructor from the attacks of insect or honey-seeking animals; and the natives, with some degree of probability, believe, that feline and other animals are deterred from taking the nest by the pointed knobs with which it is covered ; Mr. Hawkins’s correspondent in Buenos Ayres as- sured him of this. The substance is hard, the texture close, and, when seen with a slight magnifying power, seems curiously matted*. The natives say that it is principally formed of the dried dung of the “ Capincha,” which, from the description, would appear to be some sort of Water Cavy. On making a longitudinal section of this singular insect- structure down the middle, I found there were fourteen combs in it, exclusively of a globular mass at the top, seemingly the nucleus of the nest; this is nearly encircled by the two nearest combs. The other twelve are arranged beneath these, the up- permost most nearly approaching a circle in their arrangement as they approximate to the mass at the top. The different “ stories” of combs are attached to the common wall of the nest; the entrances to the various compartments are at the sides, a small irregular-shaped space being left between the comb and the outer envelope in various parts of it. Ad/ the combs are covered to the very edge by the cells, except the parts of them that are immediately close to the orifices of the nest, where, if they existed, they would impede the entrance and exit of the inhabitants. The uppermost combs are thickest, being throughout from seven to five lines in thick- ness, whilst the lower are not half that depth. ‘The cells are small, hexagonal, and, as in other wasps’ nests, have the open- ing downwards; they are formed of a light papery substance, similar in colour to the outer covering. This, as might be expected, is thickest at the top, where, internally, from the meeting of several combs, it is rather loose ; at the base it is thinnest. The knobs are solid throughout, and, like the ex- ternal envelope from which they arise, are formed of nume- rous layers of “ paper” so closely blended as to be hardly di- * The structure of paper and pasteboard, as made by insects, would form an interesting subject of investigation. In several specimens which I have had an opportunity of examining under a powerful microscope, there seem to exist great differences, some consisting of particles of wood or other ve- getable substances, simply agglutinated ; while in others these particles ap- pear to have undergone a change within the body of the insect or some other animal, and to have lost all traces of their vegetable origin; others again, as in the present instance, seem to combine both. South American Wasp which collects Honey. 319 stinguishable: the solid wall of the nest at top is about a quarter of an inch in thickness. The nest is nearly sixteen inches long: the broadest part, which is on the same line with the orifices, is more than a foot long ; the narrowest point is nine or ten inches. At the base, an imaginary straight line, drawn from the orifices to the opposite side, would be nearly a foot long. It would seem as if the nest was complete ; indeed, un- less the insects had the power of redissolving the matter at the base, or the inclination to gnaw it off, I cannot see how they could make additions to it. Many of the uppermost combs have the cells, in the middle, filled with a brownish red honey, which, in its present state, possesses scarcely any smell or taste. The occurrence of honey in the combs is interesting, inasmuch as it still further confirms the accuracy of Azara’s observation, and is made by a Vespidous insect having the first joint of the abdomen elongated into a pedicel. Azara, in the account of his residence in various parts of South America, mentioned the fact of several wasps of these countries collecting honey. The Baron Walckenaer, who edited the French translation of this work, published in 1809*, thought that the Spanish traveller, who was unskilled in en- tomoiogy, had made some mistake with regard to the insects, and regarded the so-called wasps as belonging to some Jee of the genus, of which the Apis amalthea is the type (Melipona.) Latreille also believed that they must be referred to the ge- nera Melipona or Trigona, insects which, in South America, take the place of our honey-bee. These authors were after- wards clearly convinced of the correctness of Azara’s observa- tions, by the circumstance of M. Auguste de St. Hilaire+ find- ing near the river Uruguay, an oval grey-coloured nest of a papery consistence, like that of the European wasps, suspended from the branches of a small shrub about a foot from the ground. He and two other attendants partook of some honey, and found it of an agreeable sweetness, free from the phar- maceutic taste which so frequently accompanies European honey. He gives a detailed account of its poisonous effects on himself and his two men, in the paper referred to. 366 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of lrish Zoophytes. believe, been fully understood : it is nothing more than feecal matter kept in constant rotation by the action of the cilia lining the whole internal surface of the alimentary canal, and which, by their pecu- liar arrangement, drive it on towards the place by which it is to make its exit—thus supplying the office of proper propelling mus- cles. ‘The polypi are usually non-symmetrical, one side being more bulged out than the other, but they are capable of assuming various other forms and appearances. The tentacula, too, vary much in their disposition, being sometimes directed either outwards or up- wards ; at others they are curved inwards, usually to a small ex- tent, but occasionally so much so as to be entirely lost to view, being concealed by the outer tunic of the polypus. ‘The motions of the polypi of this species are very lively and peculiar. All the Ascidian zoophytes are much more vivacious and active in their movements than the Hydroid, and this is the necessary result of their higher organization. ‘The stems, though commonly still, have free power of motion; and when one is disturbed it bends quickly to and fro, so as to strike one or two more ; these again strike upon others, and thus for a few seconds all are in action; but they soon return to quietness, and the arms, which during the com- motion had been doubled up, open again.’’—Lister. I much regret that I was unable, from want of time, to carry my observations further on the anatomy of this species, so well adapted, both from its size and the circumstance of its being the only known naked Ascidian zoophyte, for anatomical examination. I have sent a more perfect figure than has yet been given of this species to Dr. Johnston. On Vesicularia spinosa: very rare: Dublin Bay. Crisia aculeata. Milne Edwards has figured this species, which I described in the ‘ Annals of Natural History’ for November J 840, in the ‘ Annales des Sciences Naturelles’ for April 1838, under the name of La Crisie ivoire. How Milne Edwards could have con- founded this somewhat rare species with the common one C. eburnea, I am at a loss to conceive. Upon this latter species in no case have I ever met with spines; and had they ever existed, traces of them would have been visible on the sides of the cells, as they always are in C. aculeata, even when the teeth themselves have been broken off. Rarely found on stones, east of Kingstown harbour. Hippothoa lanceolata. See Plate VIII. fig. 5, 6, for a representa- tion of this elegant species. Trawled up off Bray on old valves of Pecten communis. Anguinaria spatulata. On stones east of Kingstown harbour, abundant; also at the Giant’s Causeway, on Fuci. Tubulipora verrucaria, Milue Edwards. This species in its per- fect state, as it occurs in Dublin Bay, resembles in outline a penta- petalous flower, being slightly five-lobed. This peculiarity has not, I believe, been noticed. Some time since, not knowing that it had been described, I gave it the name of Tubulipora floriformis, to express this peculiarity of form. ‘lo Mr. 'Thompson of Belfast the credit of the discovery of this as a native zoophyte is due, a fact of which I Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophyies. 367 was ignorant when I published a former paper on Irish zoophytes. Mr. Thompson has also been the fortunate discoverer of one or two other undescribed and beautiful species of Tubuliporide. Monkstown, Dublin Bay, on the frond of Laminaria digitata : not common. T. lobulata? Polypidom six-lobed ; cells irregular, united.—A. H. H. Polypidom divided into six lobes of unequal size; tubes joined, of irregular form and size. See Plate X. fig. 1, 2. Of the above Tubulipora I have met with but a single specimen; its appearance and development however is so different from any hitherto described, that I conceive myself justified in considering it to be a distinct species. Cellepora ramulosa. Not common: obtained by trawling off Howth. C. bimucronaia. Cells ovate, disposed in a single layer; aper- tures circular, with a slight excavation below, armed on each side with a short strong process.—A.H.H. A species of Cellepora is described by Lamarck under the name of Cellepora bimucronata, and which I conceive to be identical with that defined above. Although I am inclined to consider this as a distinct species, I yet do not feel assured that it is really so; if not, it is to be regarded as C. pu- micosa in the first stage of its formation. See Plate IX. fig. 1. Berenicea hyalina. On the roots of Laminaria digitata, Bray Head: not uncommon. Lepralia nitida. Lepralia costata or thoraciformis would not be an inappropriate name for this curious species, resembling, as each cell so accurately does, a miniature human thorax ; the cross pieces representing the ribs, and the broad band into which these are in- serted being analogous to a sternum. A distinct spine is frequently to be observed on each side of the lower angle of the mouth of the cell. On stones east of Kingstown harbour : rare. L. coccinea. On stones below low-water mark, east side of Kingstown harbour: common. L. variolosa. On a bivalve, Sea Point : rare. L. ciliata. ‘ Cells ovate-globose, frosted; the aperture con- tracted, circular, armed with from five to seven long spines.” The lower border of the mouth of each cell is prolonged into a spout-like process, beneath which, in perfect specimens, a pointed tooth, somewhat shorter than those surrounding the aperture, is visible. See Plate IX. fig. 2. Rather abundant on stones, shells, and fuci, Dublin Bay. The following species of Lepralia have never, I believe, been de- scribed as British zoophytes ; whether they are altogether new I cannot say. I have not, however, been able to identify them with certainty with any hitherto described, although I have consulted numerous works with this view ; among others, Delle Chiaje’s ‘ Anim. senza Vert. di Napoli,’ in which many Lepralie are figured. LL. appensa. Cells somewhat raised anteriorly, frosted, larger above than below ; aperture quadrangular, surrounded by four or fivé 368 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. long slender spines of nearly equal lengths; the lateral walls of each cell are prolonged into large, triangular, winged appendages, which are hollow, and communicate with the interior of the cells. See Plate IX. fig. 3. These appendages are always present.—A. H. H. The front wall of each cell rises into the mouth in the form of a strong pointed process. L. pedilostoma. Crust spreading irregularly ; walls of the cells reticulated; aperture calceoliform ; margin plain, everted—A. H. H. The crust of this species in a recent state is always of a red co- lour. The cells are but little raised, and are closely approximated to each other. Their divisions and arrangement are often rendered unequal and irregular by the rough surface on which they are de- veloped, being usually found in the crevices of rocks and on stones. See Plate IX. fig. 4. Blackrock and Portmarnock: not uncommon. I have also found specimens of this species adhering to the bottom of an old hulk, the Olbers, in Plymouth Sound. L. insignis. Cells raised, ventricose; aperture armed with from five to seven spines. A long spinous process rises out of the cell, Jow down and to one side.—A. H. H. This singular species is readily distinguished from all others by the position of a sharp spine or tooth, which proceeds, not from near the aperture, but low down, from the side of the cell, m the wall of which a hole is visible if one of the spines be broken off. The aperture of the cells describes 7ths of a circle, the lower part being straight. In addition to the spines which surround the aperture, and which gradually diminish in length on each side, a short pro- cess rises from the front of the cell, just below the aperture. See Plate IX. fig. 5. Dublin Bay. L. cylindrica. Crust opaque; cells cylindrical; aperture circular, plain, slightly contracted: a single broad triangular tooth rises from the anterior wall of the cell just below its aperture —A. H. H. This species bears a considerable resemblance to Berenicea hyalina, from which, however, it is estranged by the opacity of the crust as well as by the presence of the tooth. There is a neck or collar joined to the aperture in B. hyalina not present in this. See Plate IX. fig. 6. A single specimen on the root of Laminaria digitata, Dublin Bay. L. punctata. Cells oval, not much raised; apertures subqua- drangular, having the lower lip thickened and somewhat everted. On each side of the opening of the cell a small triangular process is seen, and from the upper margin of the aperture three or four short teeth arise. The walls of the cells are perforated with small holes, which give them a dotted appearance ; this is an invariable charac- ter of the species. See Plate IX. fig.7.—A.H. H. On stones, east of Kingstown harbour. L. linearis. Cells much depressed, radiating in lines from a centre, and increasing in size towards the edge of the crust, upper Mr, A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 369 part rounded; aperture contracted, circular, with a minute spout- like elongation below; teeth either three or four, surrounding the upper half of the aperture; on either side of the small spout-like elongation referred to, a short blunt process is visible. See Plate IX. fig. 8.—A. H. H. On stones east of Kingstown harbour, and at the Giant's Cause- way : not common. Membranipora stellata, Thompson. A species has been described by Mr. Thompson in the ‘Annals of Natural History’ for April 1840, p. 101, under the name of Flustra or Membdbranipora stellata. This supposed species I have ascertained to be merely Membranipora pilosa, with the bristle abortive, on an expanded surface. I wrote to Mr. Thompson upon the subject, at the same time forwarding specimens for examination, and that gentleman’s reply was con- firmatory of my opinion. Mr. Thompson was, I believe, the first who described M. pilosa to assume the sfedlate form, and to have the cells disposed in the manner indicated in the description of M. stellata. Flustra truncata.—Giant’s Causeway, abundant; but not found upon the coast of Dublin. F. avicularis. ‘This species in a recent state is of a reddish colour, but becomes of a grayish black in drying; this change of colour in drying is, I believe, peculiar to this species, and the cause of it 1am not acquainted with. I have sometimes observed the bird’s-head appendages (whose motions are so very peculiar and un- accountable) described as belonging to C. avicularia, on this species. I now find that this species is very abundant in Dublin Bay. F. lineata. Not uncommon on Patella cerulea: Bray. F. tuberculata, Not common: Merrion, Dublin Bay. F. disians. Polypidom encrusting, grayish, calcareous, reticu- lated ; cells oval; margin broad, having its inner edge slightly cre- nulated; two short processes are visible at each upper angle of the cells. I am informed by Dr. Johnston that this species was discovered some years ago by Mr. Bean, but that the habitat of his specimen was unknown. It is on this account, I imagine, that no descrip- tion of it has as yet been givenin Dr. Johnston’s ‘British Zoophytes.’ Dr. Johnston, in a recent letter to me, remarks, ‘‘ yours is the only native specimen J have seen.” From a comparison of specimens of this with Flusira tuberculata, I cannot help suspecting that they are in fact one and the same species. When at Belfast a short time since, I saw several fine specimens of this species in Mr. Thomp- son’s cabinet, obtained some time since upon the coasts of Down and Antrim. On stones east of Kingstown harbour: not common. F. carnosa. ‘This species, which is undoubtedly no Flustra, ought to be raised to a generic rank and placed in the family Alcyonidule. Pallas asserts (I quote from memory) that the tentacula vary from 18 to 30: this assertion I am not able to verify, having constantly Ann. §& Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2B 370 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. found tae number of tentacula in each polype to be the same, viz. 30. Dublin Bay : abundant on Fucus siliquosus. F. Hibernica. 1 have now ascertained that this species, which I described in my Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes published in the « Annals’ for November 1840, is not a Flustra but a Lepralia, which I have again figured and described in this paper under the head of L. pedilostoma. ‘The figure given with the Catalogue represents a posterior view of the cells, the wall of each cell posteriorly being absent. The error of figuring the cells posteriorly instead of ante- riorly, and the absence of the posterior wall, are thus accounted for. The specimen from which the figure was taken adhered to an Ascidia; this Ascidia grew on the under surface of a rock, in re- moving which, the Lepralia, which covered the rock before the As- cidia, also came away,—the mouths of the cells adhering to it, and the wall still remaining attached to the rock. The detection of an error of this nature is almost as pleasing as the discovery of a new species. Cellularia avicularia. ‘This species 1 now find to be abundant in the Bay of Dublin and about the neighbouring coast. Alcyonidium gelatinosum. Occurs in long rope-like masses, and is rarely obtained except by trawling. Rare, off Howth and Lambay. A. hirsutum. ‘The polypidom of this species in its young state is clavate, and not branched. As in this condition it might, possibly, be mistaken for a distinct species, I have given two figures of it, one representing it of its natural size; the other is a magnified view of it, with many of the polypi protruded. When under the microscope it presented a very beautiful appearance, some faint idea of which the drawing, Plate X. fig. 3, 4., is intended to convey. A. parasiticum. Polypidom encrusting, spongy ; cells polygonal, but irregular in size and arrangement. Polypes with sixteen ten- tacula. The nature of this production, which has long been involved in obscurity, I have at last succeeded in determining. By very many it was not considered to be a zoophyte at all; I have, however, as- certained, beyond all doubt, that it is a true polypiferous production of the genus Alcyonidium. Dr. Johnston describes the polypidom as ‘‘ entirely composed of particles of sand cemented together with mud or clay.”” Were this really its character, this fact alone would be sufficient to decide that it could not be a zoophyte; for the po- lypidoms of all true zoophytes are growths, and not artificial for- mations. Numerous sandy particles are certainly found in con- nexion with it, but not, in my opinion, incorporated with it; their presence, I believe, being confined to cells vacant by the death of the polypi. If previously dried, and then dropped into water, it im- mediately sinks to the bottom, and does not remain there wholly unaltered, but slowly absorbs a portion of the fluid until it has at- tained its original dimensions. I also believe that I have detected a few siliceous spicule, and certainly numerous siliceous granules, ee Se ae Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 371 which are to be distinguished from the particles of sand by their much smaller size. In a recent state a membrane is attached to the edges of each cell; this rises up in a globular form, and bears a near resemblance to the papille on 4. hirsutum. ‘The polypi cor- respond so closely with those of the other species of Alcyonidium, that I have thought it superfluous to give a separate figure of it, having the same number of tentacula, viz. 16. Encrusting various flexible corallines, Dublin Bay : common. A. echinatum. It is not a little remarkable, that the polypi of this common species should have remained hitherto undescribed. I was lately so fortunate as to meet with some specimens in which I had an opportunity of examining the animals in a living condition. The result cf this examination proves, that it is not only not allied to the family with which it has up to this time been classed, but that it is a true Hydra zoophyte, related closely to Coryne squamata, between which and Hermia glandulosa it forms a new and distinct genus. This new genus it was my wish to have dedicated to Dr. Johnston, the author of the work cn British Zoophytes, in acknow- ledgment of the valuable services rendered by that gentleman to this interesting department of natural science. In this desire I have, however, been disappointed, from the circumstance of a genus in botany having been dedicated to Dr. Johnston, the editor of Girard’s * Herbal.’ The generic name which I have adopted was suggested to me by my friend G. J. Allman, Esq. The following are the characters of the genus Ecurtnocuorium, Hassall. Polypidom encrusting ; surface raised into numerous rough papille ; polypi hydroid, naked, pedicellated.—A. H. H. Echinochorium clavigerum. Polypidom muricated with rough spinous papillz about a line in height. Polypi more or Jess clavate, not retractile within cells ; tentacula claviform, about 4rd the length of the body, retractile. There are numerous indentations on the surface of the polypidom, in each of which the base of a polype is inserted ; this latter is about 4th of an inch in height and is of a white colour; its head is some- what enlarged, and is surrounded with numerous contractile club- shaped tentacula ; the number of these varies considerably, but fre- quently amounts to between twenty and thirty. The tentacula ure not arranged in any determinate order, as they always are in the Ascidian type of zoophytes, but are variously disposed. This ob- servation applies to all Hydroid zoophytes. Whether the polypes are separate or united at their bases, | am unable to say. See Plate X. fig. 5., which is a magnified representation of this genus and species. This species does, I believe, possess a stomach, which in one of the polypi in the figure is seen to be everted. Fig. 5, 0b. Dublin Bay and Portmarnock : common. A marked correspondence exists between the natural his- tory of the coast of Antrim and the opposed shore of Scot- 2B 2 _ 372 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. land; and the relation is particularly obvious in the distribu- tion of zoophytes, three species of which, common in the North of England and on the Scottish shore, being also pre- sent on it, and not, I believe, found upon any other part of the coast of Ireland. Thus Thoa muricata (never before re- corded as Irish), Sertularia filicula and Flustra truncata, all more or less extensively distributed upon the English and Scotch coasts, are occasionally met with on the Antrim coast, in the neighbourhood of that wonder of the world, the Giant’s Causeway. Ireland, therefore, it may fairly be inferred, is indebted to Scotland for the presence of at least three species of zoophytes, and probably for some others. I think I may venture to predict that Thuiaria thuja will eventually be found on the coast of Antrim. I now find that only one species of Plumularia is wanting in the Bay of Dublin, and that is P. pennatula. To the title of my Catalogue an objection has been raised by Mr. Thompson of Belfast, on the ground that it does not embrace the whole coast of Ireland, but is confined to a par- ticular portion of it. The justice of this observation, as ori- ginally applied to that portion of the Catalogue which has already been published, I willingly admit. It should rather have been entitled a ‘ Catalogue of the Zoophytes of Dublin and its vicinity ;’ this title, however, would not be equally applicable to the continuation of the Catalogue, as to some species I have given a second locality. I wish it to be distinctly understood, that the Catalogue which has been already published, as well as this Supplement, contain only the results of my own personal observation and research. I have, therefore, not deemed it necessary to ad- vert to the writings of other Irish naturalists on this branch of natural history, not having had occasion to refer to them. I may, however, mention, that a catalogue of Irish zoophytes was published by Mr. Templeton, of Belfast, some years ago ; that many of Ellis’s specimens were obtained on the Irish coast; and that a list of unrecorded species was published by Mr. ‘Thompson in the ‘Annals of Natural History’ for June 1840, at which time my Catalogue was with Mr. Taylor, the editor, for publication. JI must not omit to notice also, that many rare species of zoophytes were procured by Mr. R. Ball and Miss Ball of Dublin, at Youghal, county of Cork. I have now brought the enumeration and description of the species to a conclusion. During the compilation of this Supplement I have had occasion to make various references to Dr. Johnston, who has always promptly and kindly favoured Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 373 me with his opinion, and to whom, therefore, my most sin- cere thanks are due. For the beautiful drawings which accompany this commu- nication, some of which I have had the pleasure of exhibiting to the Society, I am indebted to the skill and perseverance of a lady, whose name I would most willingly mention were I authorized to do so. Having brought this paper to a termination, it now only re- mains for me, in the first place, to thank the Society for the attention with which it has listened to me, and to hope that any errors of detail which may have been noticed will be ex- cused, when the time occupied, less than two months, not merely in the preparation of the manuscript and drawings, but also in obtaining the materials for it, is taken into consi- deration ; and secondly, to beg its acceptance of a collection of Irish zoophytes, a portion only of which is now upon the table. In taking my leave for the present, I cannot refrain from the expression of my most cordial wishes that the affairs of this Society may “ go on and prosper,” conferring, as it must necessarily do, moral and intellectual benefit, not merely on the members composing it, but, through them, upon the country at large. I shall at all times feel great pleasure in contributing my mite towards the promotion of its objects. With this paper terminate, I regret to say, my labours in this interesting, and as yet not fully explored, field of natural history. In a few days I shall be called upon to quit the beautiful ocean,—beautiful in its strength, its purity, its fresh- ness, its majesty, and in its infinity ; beautiful in calm and storm; and its still more beautiful and ever-varying produc- tions, in the study and contemplation of which I so much de- light. EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. Pate VI. Fig. 1. A magnified representation of Coryne squamata. Fig. 2. Hermia glandulosa, a single polype, magnified, exhibiting the reproductive gemmules. Fig. 3. Sertularia Margarita, nat. size. Fig. 4. Do., magnified. Fig. 5. Sertularia pumila, magnified. Prate VII. Fig. 1, 2. Thuiaria articulata. Prate VIII. Fig. 1. Plumularia frutescens, natural size. Fig.2. Valkeria imbricata, natural size. Fig. 3. Langenella repens? magnified. Fig. 4. New species of Valkeria. Fig. 5, 6. Hippothoa lanceolata. Piate IX. Fig. 1. Cellepora bimucronata. Fig.2. Lepralia ciliata, Fig. 3. L. appensa. Fig. 4. L. pedilostoma. Fig. 5. L. insignis. Fig. 6. L. cylindrica. Fig. 7. L. punctata. Fig. 8. L. linearis: all mag- nified. Puate X. Fig. 1. Tubulipora lobulata, natural size. Fig. 2. The same magnified. Fig. 3. Aleyonidium hirsutum, in its young state. Tig. 4. The same magnified. Fig. 5. Echinochorium clavigerum: a, one of the polypes with its feelers retracted ; 6, one with the stomach everted. 374 Mr Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations XL.—On the Composition of Chalk Rocks and Chalk Marl by invisible Organic Bodies: from the Observations of Dr. Ehrenberg. By THoomas Weaver, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S., Viel Ae soe OC. {Concluded from p. 315. ] On the Composition of the Compact Limestone of Upper Egypt and Arabia by the invisible Animalcules of the White Chalk of Europe. Born the nummulite limestone of the pyramids of Geza on the left bank of the Nile, and the same kind of rock on the right bank near Cairo, contain numerous microscopic ani- malcules of the chalk, which serve as a cement to the Num- mulites. 1 had often examined microscopically specimens which I had brought from thence, but I did not succeed in separating and rendering visible the different elements with equal clearness, until I applied my newly-acquired practice, which was much facilitated by immersing these stones a longer time in water. ‘The same result attended the examination Oe the other calcareous rock masses of Upper Egypt and Arabia, showing that the animalcules of the chalk occupy in a sur- prising manner a wide extent of country in Libya. Nummiulite limestone, wherever occurring, has been mest usually referred to the tertiary period, although perhaps often belonging to the chalk. In Egypt it possesses no great ex- tent. On the right bank of the Nile it is deposited only in the small hills near Cairo, and on the left bank, as it appears, in a tract extending from Siout to the declivity of the com- pact limestone, which latter constitutes the mass of the rocks that line the course of the Nile in Upper Egypt. It forms the foundation and principal material of the Pyramids. North- ward it is directly bordered by the slimy delta of the Nile, the productive soil of Egypt. Between the Oasis of Jupiter Am- mon and the Mediterranean, is a wide elevated plateau or table- land of rock, among whose numerous organic remains are known tertiary forms. The whole of Upper Egypt, as far as Syene, has a similar character. In 1828, though assured that its limestone rocks were more ancient than the tertiary period, yet, from want of distinct fossils, I was doubtful whether they might not be referred to the Jura formation. On the south, and not far from Syene, this limestone is in- cumbent on sandstone (Quadersandstein 7), and the two repose on granite and the primary rocks connected therewith. I gave these views in 1528 in the geologically coloured map which accompanied the first section of the first volume of my Travels in Egypt, Libya, Nubia, and Dongola. It now results, from the microscopic examination which has on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl, 375 taken place, that the whole of the limestones of Benisuef, Siout and Thebes, on the western bank of the Nile, and of Cairo and Kinek (including the gray marl near Kineh), on the eastern bank, and which inclose the Nile at an elevation of frequently 100 to 300 feet above its level, extending along the river full sixty German miles in length, are, like the Nummiulite limestone, composed of an inconceivable accumu- lation of microscopic calcareous-shelled animalcules, which are of precisely the same genera and species as those which constitute the chalk of Europe. The table-land formed by these calcareous rocks extends far westward into the Desert, and it is perhaps principally composed of them. A new and unexpected light is thus thrown on these exten- sive regions. The phanomena apparent in Egypt may be connected with those of Western Africa. It has been already shown that the same animalcules constitute the territory of Oran, stretching far along the foot of the Atlas; and when we consider the equality of surface which prevails in the plain of the Great Desert, or Sahara, of the North of Africa, and compare it with what I have myself seen along the whole extent of its eastern border, as well as on a large portion of its northern, we may be well permitted to think of a similarity of composition. But these distinct indications of a similar organic influence extend not merely to the west but also to the east of Cairo, expanded into Asia. ‘The specimens collected by Dr. Hemp- rich and myself from Hamam Faraun, and Tor in the Sinaian portion of Arabia, which I had formerly considered as ash- gray marl and yellowish-gray limestone of the tertiary epoch, were now proved, by the new method of examination, to con- sist of quite the same microscopic chalk animalcules as con- stitute the hilly masses of Upper Egypt. And from hence this formation appears to be continued eastward far into the interior of the Great Desert plain, trending toward Palestine ; but on the Arabian coast of the Red Sea we did not find it further south than Tor, which locality alone, among all the points of the east, yielded flints similar to those which occur in the European chalk. We have here to remark on the absence of siliceous animals in this limestone and marl formation, while the so-called Eeyptian pebbles and jaspers occupy the same position in horizontal layers as the flints in the North of Europe, appear- ing as their substitute. But in these Jaspers the organic sili- ceous elements are no longer to be distinctly found by reason of their intermixture with other substances, and their conse- quent opacity, giving rise to dendritic and other delineations. It seems as if the solution and conversion of the organic into the inorganic in the Egyptian pebbles (Cazlloux d Egypte) 376 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations is throughout more perfect than it is in many flints, although the constituent elements of both kinds of stone are very pro- bably quite the same. On the principal Organic Calcareous Forms which compose the mass of all Chalk. From what has been already stated, it is evident that the production of the caleareous mass of the chalk is not to be attributed, as formerly conceived, to the larger organic bodies, but to the minuter, and in the greatest measure to such as are invisible, consisting of eight genera of Polythalamia with twenty-five species, and excluding all such as may be distin- guished by the naked eye, that is, exceeding gyth of a line in magnitude ; the latter, however, are comparatively rare. It is possible that sev oral other, ae perhaps many species of the same genera, may yet be discovered in the chalk, as well as other genera, since the investigations hitherto ede could only be applied to a minimum of its substance; yet, as these were conducted by me on chalk from many regions, it does not appear probable that other sections of the ‘animal king- dom will be found to have taken so great a share in the form- ation of chalk as the Polythalamia, the principal prevailing forms of which I have indicated. From the preceding it is also apparent that the chalk rocks of all countries agree in their constituent organic forms not only according to the zoological class, but also in genera, and for the most part in species likewise; this character being not confined to the white tender writing chalk of Kurope, but ex- tending also to the compact limestone rocks of the North of Africa and the West of Asia. Particularly striking is the characteristic persistence of single forms through all these different and widely-:eparated countries. Thus in all of them are to be found otalia globulosa, with Textularia globulosa, T. aciculata ?, and 7. striata, as well as Planulina turgida, thus giving a common character to all these rock formations ; and this character becomes the more important, when we con- sider that these forms are the most numerous, and in fact are the chief constituents of the chalk*. * The Polythalamian forms which Mr. Lonsdale noticed in the English chalk in 1837 as visible to the naked eye, and amounting to 1000 in one pound of the chalk, and which, with Mr. Lyell, he has named Lenticulina and Discorbis+, appear, judging by the figures, to be referable to Rotalia ornata and R. globulosa, including perhaps fragments of Textularia globulosa. I may here remark, that my continued researches on the Polythalamia of the chalk have convinced me, that very frequently in the earthy coating of + Dr. Buckland’s Bridgewater Treatise, 2nd Edition, vol. i. p. 448. 1837. Lyell’s Elements of Geology, 1838. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 377 If now the question be asked whether the forms which occur in such masses in chalk belong to it exclusively, and are hence to be considered characteristic of that estate I am almost disposed to reply in the affirmative. The analogous forms which occur in sea-sand, tertiary sand, and indeed in all mo- dern formations, are viewed for the most part as different and larger species, although of the same genera; and it does not appear that any of these forms can be referred with perfect certainty to such as are now living in the sea. To the theory of the formation of limestone, the observation is important, that these organic deeply-seated relations are not peculiar to the chalk formation. The tertiary calcareous beds consist, in like manner with the chalk, of multitudes of such Polythalamian animals, which compose in many quarters sandy sea-downs of great extent; and even in the sandy desert of Libya we can recognize distinct Polythalamia. On the other hand, having succeeded in discovering microscopic Poly thalamia in the compact flints of the Jura limestone from Cracow, which are of decidedly different forms from those of the chalk, the calcareous animals being Nodosaria urceo- lata, n. sp., and Soldania elegans, n. sp., and the siliceous Pyxidicula prisca?, with fragments of soft sponges, it becomes apparent that such invisible organic bodies were also present in the formation of the Jura limestone. On the Geographical Distribution of Living Polythalamia on the African and Asiatic Coasts of the Mediterranean, and in the Red Sea. The materials collected by Dr. Hemprich and myself in the Mediterranean refer to four points on the Libyan coast, and one point on the Syrian coast. In regard to a second point on the latter coast (St. Jean d’ Acre), I have acquired a knowledge of some forms from the collection of Dr. Parthey. From the Red Sea nine forms were made known to us by d’ Orbigny, collected from sand presented to him by Deshayes. But from the collections made by Dr. Hemprich and myself from thirteen points along the whole length of the Red Sea, it appears that very numerous forms exist. Of seven of those points, one occurs on the western (African) coast at Suez, and six on the eastern (Arabian) coast, namely, at ‘Tor, Erraie and el Ard, Moileh, el Wusch and Gumfide; and of the remain- ing six, five are islands on the Arabian side, namely, Sanafer, flints, which is partly caleareous and partly siliceous, the original caleareous- shelled animal forms have exchanged their lime for silex, without under- going any alteration in figure, so that while some are readily dissolved by an acid, others remain insoluble; but in the chalk itself all similar forms are immediately dissolved. 378 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations Maksure, Barkan, Sanac and Ketumbul, and one an island on the African side of the Red Sea, namely, Massaua. It is possible that by repeated and closer examination of the marine productions collected by us, many other Polythalamia may be found besides those already discovered. In ‘the mean time, as a preliminary, | have drawn up a list of the species hitherto met with*. From this it results that the total num- ber of species of Polythalamia observed in the Red Sea are Jifty, and in the Mediterranean, on the Libyan and Syrian coasts, twenty-seven. ‘Vhe new species derived from the two seas amount to fifly-four, of which twenty-seven species are peculiar to the Red Sea, and seventeen are common to both seas. Particularly worthy of notice is the wide distribution and massy development of the Peneroplis planatus and Sorites Orbiculus, which are rare on the European coast. ‘These forms are not only present almost everywhere in the East, but con- stitute the predominant masses. On the other hand, the Ro- talia Beccarii, which composes the Italian hills, occurs only singly and very rarely in the Red Sea; and I nowhere found it on the Libyan and Syrian coasts. ‘The Sorites Orbiculus I have also from St. Domingo. In reviewing these subjects, even a superficial comparison of them with the contents of the chalk and chalk marl, is at- tended with the striking result, that none of these living forms to) are found among the animalcules of the chalk, not even among those which compose the compact limestone of the Egyptian and Arabian rocks, and which are still partly washed by the sea near Hamam Faratn. Remarks on Polythalamia. Aiter a preliminary view of the researches of earlier la- bourers in this branch of zoological i inquiry, Dr. Ehrenberg ob- serves:—A lively interest respecting the minute Polythalamian bodies which enter into the composition of sea-sand was ex- cited anew by the work of Alcide d’Orbigny in 1826, in which are contained a great number of new species, while many of those which were previously known are examined with greater * Of d’Orbigny’s nine species from the Red Sea, there are three which I cannot identify, namely, Triluculina bicarinata, Quingueloculina limbata, and Q. punctata ; but the other six are probably these with which I have become acquainted, and to which | have therefore given the same names, namely, Textularia communis, Calcarina Defrancii, C. Gaudichaudi, Quin- gueloculina sulcata, and Vertebralina striata. His Assilina (Nummutlina) ni- tida | hold to be the Sorites Orbiculus. Although I possess and have compared many of the Pelythalamia which have been described by d’Orbigny derived from the same lccalities, yet 1 am in want of a great number of the originals named by him, and as this author has generally given new names unaccompanied by descriptions, I have not in most cases been able to determine to what form the name given by him belongs. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 379 care, and an improved and easier view is taken of the whole subject. By his active exertions he had collected between 600 and 700 species from the sea-sand of France, Italy, England, the Isle of France, Sandwich Islands, the Malouine and Ma- rian Isles, &c., of which, however, only 425 received names. The whole mass of these microscopic animalcules, which he again decidedly associates with the Mollusks and Cephalopods, but in a distinct order under the name of Foramzniferes, are distributed by him into five families, according to the spiral or other form in the grouping of the cells; these families com- prising fifty-two genera. On this work Deshayes made vari- ous critical remarks in the Dictionnaire Classique. D’ Orbign expressly states that the animal of the Polythalamia (his Fora- minifera) resembles the Sepia in the structure of its body, al- though much smaller, and then proceeds to give the essential characters of the living body of the Polythalamia, yet without naming specifically or generically any one animal from which they were taken*. Both Blainville ard Dujardin have made the correct obser- vation that the minute shells of the Polythalamia are external cases, and not, as incorrectly viewed by Denys de Montfort and Alcide d’Orbigny, internal bones. Yet in referring the microscopic so-called Cephalopods to the Infusoria, Dujardin commits a mistake+. It was this contradiction between ob- servers that induced Férussac, in his great work, Histoire Na- turelle des Mollusques, to exclude the Foraminifers from the class of the Mollusks; and others entertained similar objec- tions, yet without assigning to them a correct position. In the year 1831 J laid before the Academy contributions to the knowledge of Coral animals, with an attempt to class them physiologically ; which attempt was entirely founded on my own observations of the living animalcules, when, accom- panied by Dr. Hemprich, I travelled on the Red Sea in the years 1828 and 1825. In that work I designated the Coral animals as composed of two strongly marked organically di- stinct groups, under the names of Anthozoa and Bryozoa. In the year 1831 also, I communicated in the Symbole Physice the first development made of the complicated structure of the Halcyonella stagnorum, one of the Bryozoa, and showed that it was quite similar to that of Flustra. The researches of Dujardin in 1835 gave an entirely new di- rection to the ideas which had been formed of the Polythala- mia, showing that not a trace of resemblance was to be found between them and Sepia; on the contrary, the greatest sim- plicity of structure became apparent, bespeaking a simple ani- * Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 1826, t. vii. p. 249. + dnnales des Sciences Naturelles. Seconde Série, t. iv. p. 343, 1835. 380 Mr. Weaver’s View of Khrenbers’s Observations mal body covered by a shell, with the power of extending or contracting itself at will. But when Dujardin expressly com- pares the Polythalamia to the Proteus (Amoeba) of the Infu- soria, such an association cannot be admitted, unless it be first proved that a polygastric structure exists in those bodies. He has given to them the new name of Rhizopodes. I showed, in 1837, that the Polythalamia could not well possess an organization similar to that of the Infusoria, as not a single known true species of Infusoria has a calcareous shell ; and I had, in 1823, discovered, as I conceived, a true living Polythalamia of earlier authors, resembling in organization the very complex Flustra. ‘The correctness of this view was fully established in 1839, after having examined anew, ac- cording to my improved method, the small Nautilus Orbzcu- lus of Forskal, which d’Orbigny designated in 1826 as Num- mulina (Assilina) nitida, specimens of which I had collected from the sand of the Red Sea in 1823, and which I have named Sorites Orbiculus. The result proved that the disc-like shell was a Polypary, often composed of more than one hun- dred singie animalcules, the cells of which quite resemble those of a Flustra, the animal putting forth and retracting from six to eight tentacula. And I even discovered in the interior of the single cells well-preserved siliceous Infusoria, the last food taken by the animal; and in some of them also small globu- lar bodies, which, without much constraint, may be considered as egos. ‘Though I had at an early period observed that the disc was composed of many cells, yet I could not perceive an opening to them; but the discovery of Infusoria in their in- terior led me to consider by what means they could have been introduced. Reflection reminded me that I had often seen Coral animals which in the expanded state exhibited many large bodies with tentacula and a large mouth, yet when con- tracted left scarcely a trace of the openings through which they were protruded from the common Polypary. As such I remembered Pennatula, Lobularia, Halcyonium and similar forms, in which I had frequently observed, that in the skin of the animal existed calcareous particles, which on the contrac- tion of the skin so completely closed the opening as to render it no longer perceptible. Renewed examination of the closed surface of the cells of the Nautilus Orbiculus, Forskal, now showed to me that in them also dendritic calcareous particles exist, the close approximation of which closes the cell, so that the cover of the cell is in fact the dried skin of the animalcule. I now made an experiment in proof, by dissolving the small shell in dilute muriatic acid, in order to obtain the animal body in a free state; and it succeeded perfectly. 1 obtained as many animalcular bodies as there were cells, connected to- on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 381 gether by band-like processes, and in the interior of many of them there were well-preserved siliceous Infusoria. I then treated in the same manner the Flustra pilosa and F. membra- nacea of the Baltic, and found in their interior also siliceous Infusoria. The same results followed a similar examination of the shells of otalia from the sand of Rimini, of the shells of Peneroplis planatus, Pavonina Antillarum, and of Orbicu- lina numismalis from the sea-sand of St. Domingo, as well as of other shells with their animals from the sand of the Red Sea and the Mediterranean; so that now a view is obtained of the more general organization of the principal groups of the Po- lythalamia. It results clearly from what has been said in respect of these species, which are so common and widely distributed, and which have hitherto been designated in systems as small Nautili, that the straight-jointed shells of Nodosaria (formerly viewed as Orthocera), as well as the spiral shells of Rotalia, Cristellaria, &e. (considered as Nautili or Ammonites), and the shells of Biloculina resembling vermiform tubes (Serpula), are none of them internal calcareous parts which were encased by an ani- mal body, similar to the internal bone of Sepia, or the cylin- drical spiral bone of Spirula; but, on the contrary, that they are external calcareous shells, bearing analogy to those of Mollusks, or more correctly to those of Flustra and Cellepora, which, after separation by an acid, disclose and render visibly free the internal simple body or the Polypary, exhibiting pre- cisely the same form. If the shell of Polythalamia be fre- quently perforated with pores, this is no proof that no other openings exist, or that the animals receive nourishment through many tubes, for the same structure is not unfrequently found in Flustra accompanied with the peculiar opening from which the fore-part of the animal body may be protruded; and in these exist also fringe-like filaments, which are extensile and retractile, and by no means to be compared to the pseudopo- dia or variable feet of Amoeba, but probably bear analogy to the mantle fringes of many Mollusks, applicable to the pur- poses of creeping and attachment, and for which perhaps they were specially designed. Moreover, Flustra possess a distinct large animal organization; and the siliceous Infusoria, and probable eggs found in Polythalamia, clearly bespeak in them also similar relations, the discovery of which, however, had hitherto been prevented by the calcareous encasement and the minuteness of the objects. It has resulted from the examination of the soft small ani- mal bodies of living Polythalamia, that while many resemble Flustra or Eschara assembled in families or polyparies, each such family being often composed of hundreds of much mi- 382 Mr. Weaver’s View of Khrenberg’s Observations nuter single animalcules, many others are single animals after the manner of Mollusks. Hence arise external characters and forms which have often a reference to very different relations, which it is first necessary to distinguish before we can succeed in obtaining a clear view of the whole. The assiduous and careful labours of d’Orbigny retain their full value, serving as a basis to all future researches; and if in the present com- munications I shall have succeeded in turning the inquiry into a more physiological channel, my object will be attained, To the term Polythalamia, (originally introduced by Dr. Brey n, of Danzig, in 1732,) a different extension or significa- tion under oben: names has been given by different authors: To remove this unsteadiness and wanton change of names, which only lead to obscurity, it appears advisable to apply the term Poly thalamia, in preference, as Soldani had done, to that group in which the animalcules actually live in many cells, and do not, like the Nautili, possess many empty cells. ‘This di- stinction, that the animal of the Polythalamia has no empty cells, but that all its cells are simultaneously occupied, is of particular importance in their systematic arrangement among other animal bodies. Where there are many cells, they consist either of so many single animals, the whole constituting a poly- pary, or of organically filled integrant portions of one and the same individual forming groups. “Both structures are foreign to the true Cephalopods. "The shell-bearing Cephalopods may with Linnzeus be divided into the unilocular and multilocuiar. On the other hand, the want of a sipho which has been as- signed as a character of Polythalamia, and from which they were named Asiphonoidea by De Haan, is incorrect, inasmuch as many really possess a part which may be fully compared to a sipho, if not in function, yet in form, namely, the tube which connects the separate cells of Nodosarina and of all individual many-celled forms. It is only i in the Miliolina family among the simple Polythalamia, and it is only in the families of Aste- rodiscina and Soritina among those forming polyparies, that the want of a sipho is really necessary, because they live in- dividually i in single cells. But all the Nodosarina, "Textula- rina, Uvellina, Rotalina, and Plicatilia among the simple Po- lythalamia, and the Frumentarina, Helicosorina, and Alveo- linea among those which form polyparies, possess tubes of connexion between the cells, which very frequently resemble also in form the sipho of the Nautilus. D’Orbigny, it is true, states also that the cells of Foraminifers are connected by se- veral openings; that, however, proceeds from an erroneous view, for such Poly thalamia alone present several openings at the border of the cells, whose calcareous surface is interrupted _in the form of a net-work, exhibiting often a relation analogous on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 383 to that which is frequent in Madrepora and Astrea, in which the soft body is not divided or sharply cut off by com- pact calcareous plates, but the soft parts appear interwoven with minute calcareous rods, in a lattice-like manner. These numerous small connecting openings, which are sometimes visible in some of the Rotalia and Rosalina, and also in the Textularia, [ do not consider essential, but hold that the true channel of connexion has always a large diameter, and is sim- ple for each single animal. The erroneous view of d’Orbigny and of all his followers becomes so complicated, that polypa- ries are held to be single animals, and consequently the vari- ous connecting openings to be those of a simple individual. With respect to d’Orbigny’s genus Nummulina, although it has derived advantage from his diligent investigations, I consider it as composed of very heterogeneous elements, which belong to quite different divisions of animals. Some species of the sub-genus Assilina, and perhaps all of them, may be- long to the families Soriéina and Asterodiscina, while the As- silina nitida of the Red Sea is assuredly Forskal’s Nautilus Orbiculus, that is, Sorites Orbiculus. I am of opinion that all those species which are provided with visible traces of mouths or openings, as in Lamarck’s genus Lenticulina with d’Orbigny’s character of Nummulina, are to be received among the Polythalamia; but that all such species as have the form of a lens or disc, and are provided with internal spiral cells, but without a trace of such mouths, the cells being moreover separated from the external surface by thick calcareous layers, are to be considered as internal bones. These mouthless Nummulina are rather to be ranged with the Velellida of the Acalepha along with Porpita, where similar internally cellular coin-shaped bones exist. The con- siderable size of many Nummulina is also striking and foreign to Polythalamia, but agrees very well with the family of the Velellida, as also in the want of traces of the attachment of muscles, and in the want of a sipho or channel of connexion between the cells. Until better informed, therefore, I de- cidedly exclude the mouthless Nummulina from the Polytha- lamia, and retain only Lamarck’s Lenticulina in the sense at- tached to d’Orbigny’s Nummulina in a young state. The distinctive character of the Polythalamia, when com- pared with their nearest relatives the Flustra, Eschara, Cri- statella, &c., consists in the shell, and in their freedom of mo- tion. But with this may be combined the power of attachin itself to other bodies, just as in the Cristatella (or Hydra also) which often remains long attached, and then creeps again, Those bodies which are apparently Polythalamian, but are really adherent and immoveable, belong to the Cedlepora, 384 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations Flustra, Tubulipora, and similar forms. The simplest Poly- thalamian form is the M7/iola in Dujardin’s sense, if there be really such self-existent animals, and they be not the young of others, or of many-celled forms most nearly related to Bi- loculina. And perhaps Gromza oviformis might be so viewed, should it not prove to be a Difflugia (an Infusoria). In ehis series I myself place provisionally, as doubtful, those nume- rous small globules of the sand of Rimini which have no di- stinct opening, or sometimes present a very minute one. ‘The next simplest fovmis'thatal a simple straight row of cells, as in the Nodosaria, a jointed continued development of a sim- ple body. Textularina, Uvellina and Rotalina (Lenticulina), may, as to external form, be viewed as Nodosarina developed in another manner, namely, in botryoidal or spiral forms. I have here to make a remark that appears important. In the entire vast mass of known Polythalamia, a case or vest- ment prevails which is either cuticular or composed of a cal- careous substance, while in Infusoria either a cuticular or sili- ceous substance prevails, so that hitherto no calcareous-shelled Infusoria nor siliceous-shelled Polythalamia had presented themselves. Yet among the fossi] microscopic organisms of the chalk marl of Sicily, we find intermingled with the Infu- soria shells bodies whose forms may be ranked with Poly- thalamia, namely, with Nodosarina, ‘but the shells of which are siliceous, insoluble in acids, and which to the eye have a more transparent vitreous aspect than the calcareous shells when penetrated by balsam. I have hence been induced to place these siliceous-shelled forms, unti! a further knowledge may be acquired of their organization, among the polygastric Infusoria near the shelled Amoeba, in a separate family, under the name of Arcellina composita, or Polycystina*. Such sili- ceous-shelled Polycystina, resembling calcareous-shelled Po- lythalamia, are the genera Lithocampe, Cornutella and Ha- liomma, with several species. I wish here to draw attention to a small character hitherto unregarded, which is distinctive of true Polythalamia, and often even of their fragments. It consists in this, that in the tube or channel of connexion between the cells, the mouth of the tube which belongs to the earlier smaller cell is overgrown and surrounded by the succeeding larger cell. If the mouth of the last cell be prolonged in a beak-like form, we find in all the earlier smaller cells a distinct tube, quite similar to the hard remains of the sipho in the Nautilus; but so placed that the tube always projects forward from the smaller into the larger cell, and never backward from the larger into the smaller * This view has been already indicated in the work “On the Infusoria as perfect organisms,” 1838, p. 136. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 385 cell. In the Nautilus, this projection of the tube of connexion is reversed, always proceeding from the larger to the smaller chamber, so that in the last, the greatest chamber, the body of the animal thus acquires a smooth foundation, upon which it can move more freely. In true Nautili also the base of the cells is concave or undulated in the forward direction, while in the Polythalamia it appears without exception to be either quite straight or convex in that direction. This character was also observed by Fichtel and Moll. The tabular view which I have given of the Bryozoa, found- ed as it is on the new observations which I have made, is drawn up with special regard to a definite expression of fossil phzenomena, the ancient names of d’Orbigny being mostly re- tained. This very diligent precursor in these studies first laid down a foundation rich in forms and systematically ordered, which may serve for all future investigations, and has given names to families which are well adapted to his purpose; but these I have been obliged to alter, yet not arbitrarily, inas- much as from the difference of our views it became necessary to separate from each other the forms which constitute his families, according as they are either simple Polythalamia, or Polythalamia composing polyparies. Since the foregoing pages were drawn out, a newer work by Dr. Ehrenberg has made its appearance, embracing com- munications made to the Berlin Academy, on the continued researches of the author between September 1839 and August 1840, and bearing the title, “On the numerous Living Species of Animals found in the Chalk Formation*.” Of this very inter- esting publication I had designed presenting an abstract, but having learned that a complete English edition of the work is about to appeart accompanied by the engravings, I now con- fine myself to a few notices immediately connected with the preceding part of this paper. In this memoir Dr. Ehrenberg repeats his objections to the views entertained by MM. Alcide d’Orbigny and Dujardin. It has been seen, that to the Polythalamia, whose minute and often microscopic calcareous shells compose in inconceivable numbers, and in now nearly 1000 known different forms, the principal mass of chalk rocks and of many sands of the sea, M. d’Orbigny had several years since ascribed an external animal bearing the form of a Sepia, the small shell itself, which * Ueber noch zahlreich jetzt-lebende Thierarten der Kreidebildung, pp. 94, with four plates, Berlin, 1840. ; ¢ In the Scientific Memoirs of Mr.R. Taylor. Its publication cannot fail to prove very acceptable to British Naturalists in general. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2C 386 Mr. Weaver’s View of Khrenberg’s Observations often resembles an Ammonite or Nautilus, being considered as the internal bone. On the other hand, at a later period, M. Dujardin denied that these animals possessed any organic structure, stating that they consisted simply of an animated slime capable of extension, encased by an indurated external shell, and associating them with the pseudopodian Amoeba of the Infusoria. Dr. Ehrenberg now further demonstrates, by figures and descriptions, their true organic structure, thus fully establishing his former positions, both as to simple Po- lythalamia and Polythalamia forming Polyparies. He proves that they are not internal bones, but external shells encasing a soft body, the shell being perforated, as it were, in all parts by numerous pores, from which the animal projects long fila- ments, capable at will of extension, retraction and bifid divi- sion, and productive of locomotion. ‘The author further ob- serves: M. Dujardin has, in August 1840, presented to the Paris Academy a Mémoire sur une Classification des Infusoires en rapport avec leur organisation, in which a new arrangement of the Infusoria is exhibited, and in this the Polythalamia are again introduced as RAzzopodes in association with Amoeba and Actinophrys of the Infusoria, forming a separate family. If, however, anatomical and physiological details are to be taken into account when we proceed to the systematic arrangement of different organic bodies, and we are not governed merely by the relations of external forms, M. Dujardin’s arrangement cannot be deemed a happy one. He has in no case shown a polygastric structure in the Rhizopodes, and that it is not po- lygastric is proved anew by my investigations now commu- nicated. It has been shown in a former part of this paper that Dr. Ehrenberg had recognized six species of Infusoria in the chalk formation, so closely resembling living species as not to be di- stinguished from them, and hence he was led to give to them the same names; namely, Hunotia Zebra, Fragilaria rhabdo- soma, Fragilaria striolata ?, Gallionella aurichalca, Navicula ventricosa, and Synedra ulna. He had also referred, with a mark of interrogation, the following four species of calcareous- shelled Polythalamia to the white chalk, in which they are very extensively distributed, namely, Globigerina bulloides, Globigerina helicina, Rosalina globularis, and Textilaria aci- culata, all of which were stated by M. d’Orbigny to have oc- curred in the living state only in the Adriatic Sea and the Ocean. If any doubt had existed as to the identity of all these fossil and living species, it has been completely removed by the later researches of Dr. Ehrenberg, by which the actual number of known species found in the chalk formation and in on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 387 the living state has been extended to fifty-seven, namely, of calcareous-shelled Polythalamia nine species, and of siliceous- shelled Infusoria forty-eight species. The following is a list of these species and of the localities in which they occur, both in the living and fossil state. In the fossil localities, W. C. signifies white chalk, C. M. chalk marl, and C. C. compact chalk. Calcareous-shelled Polythalamia. Living. Fossil. 1. Globigerina bulloides Rook Sea a C. Denmark. helicina . . 2...) —————$——-——-__ W..C. Cattolica. . Rosalina globularis . — W.C. Gravesend. : een eyzou \ North Sea,nearCuxhaven W. C. Cattolica. otalia) ocellata. . { W.C.in Russia, Poland, | Prussia, | Denmark, el England, France and } Sicily; and C. M. in | Greece, Zante, Sicily eS bo 5. Rotalia globulosa . .._ ———-—— and Oran. ; W.C. Cattolica. e CC eae tea ea Ae aC Caliasinieten’ W. C. England, France, Te (Synon. Planu- Prussia, Denmark. lina?) turgida .. i Tey C. M. Oran. C. C. Egypt and Arabia. WC: Prussia, Den= mark, England and oe sand Sicily. Adriatic and the Ocean | @ yy. Greece: C. C. Egypt and Arabia. W. C. of all European countries, from Wolsk | to Ireland. 8. Textilaria aciculata . globulosa ... North Sea......... C. M. Sicily, Oran, and Greece. C. C. Egypt and Arabia. Szliceous-shelled Infusoria. 10. Actinocyclus quina- { North Sea, Tjorn Isle in| Me Caltacncree, MIUS(r heheh ces the Cattegat ...... a ; ; 11. —— biternarius. .. North Sea, Tjorn.... CSS Hae NEG é North Sea, Cuxhaven, { C. M. Oran, Caltasinet- os = mae at ha Christiania, Tjorn. . . ta, and Greece. . = C. M. Oran, Caltasinet- 13. septenarius .. North Sea in the Cattegat ta aud Zante. cathe. _ J C.M. Oran and Caltasi- 14. octonarlus)..... = =e 15. nonarius .... N.Sea,CattegatnearTjorn. C. M. Oran. 16. denarius .... ——————————_—__. C. M. Oran. 3 $$ ie undenarius. . | and’ Bay of Christiania’ } ©: M. Oran and Zante. 18. —— bisenarius. ... Cattegat near Tjdrn ... CC. M. Oran. 19. quindenarius . , ————————_—__......._ C.. M. Oran. 20. Amphitetras antedita | eee Ma Oran and Greree WIE Ay Ae aes ee nec 2C2 388 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations Living. Fossil. Baltic, N. Sea, Mediter- 21. Biddulphia pulchella. ranean, and Ocean near + C. M. Greece. Cubawoi tae eierene are <2 Coc ite: Brackish and fresh waters. C. M. Greece. iloeW bce Oo Gm Glo ec : C. M. Caltasinetta and 23. Coscinodiscus Argus. North Sea, Cuxhaven .. On ———————————, Tjorn 24, eccentricus ... in Cattegat, and Mexi- +} C. M. Oran. | can Gulf, Vera Cruz. 25. lineatus®. << <7. North Sea, Cuxhaven .. C. M. Caltasinetta. 26 ae C.M. Caltasinetta, Oran, olen — ah, iY) | and Zante. 27, —— Oculus Iridis. . ———————————— .... CC. M. Greece. 28 Patinaytemey- ists 7. C. Me Zante. P ANd ||| CME; Oran, Caltasinetta, oie Pars a { Baltic, Wismar. ... . and Zante. C. M. Caltasinetta, Oran, Zante, and Greece. ° N. Sea, Christiania and) C. M. Oran and Caltasi- aT HIDE Gio ‘Tjorn, & Baltic, Wismar f _ netta. Pentasterias .. N.Sea, Christiania liaven. C. M. Zante. N. Sea, Cuxhaven, Chris-] © y7, Caltasinetta, Oran, 30. Dictyocha sulcata . . North Sea near Tjérn . . 33. —— Speculum ... tiania and ‘Tjorn, Bal- Zante, and Greece, tie; near Miek ~2 3 is. 34. Eunotia granulata . . Brackish and fresh waters. C. M. Greece. 35. Zebray.reoshers Berlin fresh waters. ... OC. M. Greece. 36. Fragilariarhabdosoma Berlin, Halle, Copen- } W. C. Gravesend hagen, Sweden . . StrlOlatary = shee ts sole ee) ee hele. eines W. C. Gravesend. Berlin fresh waters, Leip- zig, Thuringia, Fran- 38. Gallionella aurichalca conia, Wiirzburg, Stutt- > W. C. Rugen. gart, and on rocks near the Faroe Isles ; C. M. Caltasinetta, Oran, 5 Zante, and Greece. 40. Grammatophora afri- | sea, Heligoland, Tjrn C- M. Oran. 39. suleata. st's < - North Sea, Cuxhaven . 41. angulosa .... North Sea, Tjorn .... C. M. Oran. Callao in Peru, Vera Cruz in Mexico, Tjorn in 42 oceanica .... Cattegat, Wismar in >C. M. Oran. Baltic, and the Mediter- Tanean sete eons) eee 43 Among marine Conferve undulata .. - -{ SATE Airg ee ee 2, C. M. Greece. C. M. Greece. 44. Haliomma radians . . North Sea, Cuxhaven . . 45. Navicula Didymus. . { N. Sea, Cuxhaven, Baltic, ©. M.Galunincies Wasa) en © rcue ene 46. —— Entomon.... N. Sea, Christianiahaven. C. M. Greece. 47. —— norwegica ... ————___________ C.. M. Grreeee. ep ae So | and Tjorn Isle. ... he. we SEES, Paris, Berlin, Saxony, Bo- 49. —— ventricosa. . . | hemia, Buchtarma a C. M. Oran. Altai, and Irtysch. ; Berlin fresh waters, sant C. 50. VITIG ape eer senfels in Saxony, and Wismarin Mecklenburg. M. Greece. on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl, 389 Living. Fossil. Flints of the W. C. near 51. Peridinium pyropho- . ‘ Gravesend, and Flints PUM ei hic ae eee Baltic, near Kiel. of the plain of North Germany near Delitzsch. Gulf of Flensburg, Break- } C. M. Oran ers near Gothenburg. Va : Baltic near Wismar, Ber- 52. Striatella arcuata... lin fresh waters, North of Germany, Denmark, 53. Synedra ulna... .. Scotland, Holland, the > C. M. Oran. Ural, and perhaps Isle of France, and Masca- rene) Isles. 35; th aie 54, Tessella Catena ... nee M. Caltasinetta. 55. Triceratium Favus. . North Sea, Cuxhaven.. C. M. Greece. Flints of W. C. Graves- 56. Xanthidiumfurcatum Berlin .......... end, and Flints of ! Delitzsch. Flints of W. C. Graves- 57. hirsutum .... Peat waters near Berlin. end, and Flints of ' Delitzsch. Of these fifty-seven species, thirty belong to the geolo- gically acknowledged chalk and its Sicilian marls. The re- mainder from Oran, Greece (probably Egina), and Zante, though perhaps from beds not equally well defined by relative position as chalk marls, yet occurring, as they do, with nume- rous decided calcareous and siliceous animals of the chalk,— the geological relations of these species may also be considered as firmly established. These new discoveries naturally lead to the conclusion that we have now no very definite boundary between secondary and tertiary tracts, and that the first dawn or eocene period of the present living organic creation, must be sought for deeper than the chalk formation; a view that appears to be confirmed by the occurrence of a living Trochus below the chalk, of the Paludina vivipara and Cyclas cornea in the Weald Clay, and of the Terebratula caput serpentis in the - Upper Oolite. But as this and other interesting conclusions and views entertained by the author will be shortly laid open to the reader, with a full detail of the progressive researches made, I shall not now enter further upon the important mat- ter contained in the volume. 390 Mr. Weaver on M. Alcide d@Orbigny’s View APPENDIX. Closely connected with the preceding subjects is the valu- able Memoir of M. Alcide d’Orbigny, which has recently ap- peared, entitled, ‘On the Foraminifers of the White Chalk of the Paris Basin*®.” ‘The subjoined extracts may serve to con- vey a view of the general scope of the work, which, placed in parallel with that of Dr. Ehrenberg, cannot but excite a dou- ble interest in the mind of the reader. Previously to entering upon the direct object of the Memoir, M. d’Orbigny indulges in a few general reflections. Let us, says the author, cast a rapid glance upon what has existed and upon what still exists in nature, in reference to the Foraminifers. We have found them distributed through the oolite series, extending from the lias to the uppermost beds; but in the cretaceous system they appear still more numerously and more varied in their forms. The Neocomian beds, those of the gault and the green sand, contain many ; but in proportion as we ascend from the lower to the higher strata, they increase infinitely. In these latter the rock may be said to be often composed of them, and, as an example, we may mention the largest of the Pyramids of Egypt. In the white chalk the number is nearly as great as in those seas in which they now most abound. In a word, we have found Foraminifers in the cretaceous basins of the Seine, the Loire, the Gironde, and of the whole South of France, and in Belgium. If we pass to the tertiary tracts, a whole world is opened to us. The multiplied Foraminifers which appear in the basins of Paris, Bourdeaux, Touraine, Italy, Austria, Ger- many, England, and Belgium, often form there the greater part of the mass. A bed of considerable thickness in the environs of Gentilly, near Paris, is entirely composed of them, the Foraminifers being in contact with each other, scarcely united by a slight cement. In a cubical inch of the rock we have found fifty-eight thousand, which is equal to three thou- sand millions in a metre, and shows what myriads may exist in the Paris basin. These small bodies, which we thus see forming entire beds in the lowest portions of the tertiary series, are not less common in the higher stages; for in Austria, and * Memoire sur les Foraminiferes de la Craie Blanche du Basin de Paris, in the 4th vol, part 1 of the Transactions of the Geological Society of France, 1840. of the White Chalk of the Paris Basin. 391 in the environs of Sienna in Italy, they often constitute one- sixth of the fossil mass; they are also extensively distributed in the Crag of England* and of Belgium. So much in refer- ence to what has existed; let us now throw a glance upon that which exists. We are in the present day acquainted with Foraminifers from every region of the sea, and we know that they exist in extent from the equator to the frozen portions of continents. If we judge of the important part they play by their numbers in certain quarters, it will be impossible to doubt that their remains form the greater part of the banks of sand which im- pede navigation, obstruct gulfs and straits, fill up ports, and form with corals those isles which are daily rising in warm regions from the bosom of the ocean. Thus these minute shells, which, anterior to our epoch, have assisted in leveling basins of immense extent, and in forming mountains, are now still constantly changing the depth of coasts and modifying the bottom. This view of their agency in nature is doubtless sufficient to prove the import- ance which attaches to their study. We will add, that the comparative study of the fossil Fora- minifers of all beds has proved to us a fact important to geology, namely, that each bed has its characteristic species, which serve to distinguish it, let the circumstances be what they may; and as these minute shells are infinitely more com- mon than those of Mollusks, the knowledge to be derived from them is so much the more certain, and becomes extremely interesting. Another fact no less curious has been demonstrated to us by the study of living species from every region of the globe. Many genera are peculiar to the hottest zones of continents, while others, on the contrary, are found only in temperate or cold regions. Hence the geographical distribution of living genera and species offers to us a means of comparison of the highest importance with a view to the determination of the temperature of the waters in which fossil species lived, * Mr. Lyell has communicated to us the species which he discovered in the Crag. ; + We are acquainted at present with nearly fifteen hundred living and fossil species of Foraminifers ; and how many important facts may be de- rived from the study of these small bodies may be seen in three works which we are now publishing: 1. the Fauna of the Antilles, printed in L Histoire politique, physique, et naturelle de I Ile de Cuba, by M. dela Sagra ; 2. that of the Canaries, published in ? Histoire Naturelle of those islands, by MM. Webb and Berthelot; 3. the Fauna of the southern extremity of America, forming a part of our Voyage dans ? Amérique Meéridionale. 392 Mr. Weaver on M. Alcide d’Orbigny’s View and may lead to very satisfactory results in geology, if we may judge by the fruits of our observations in this respect. We could have desired to establish some general facts of much greater extent, founded on new observations recently made by us on the class of the Foraminifers; but the pre- sent occasion not admitting such an extension, let us pass to the Foraminifers of the white chalk of the Paris basin. The geological position of the white chalk of Paris is so well known that we have not thought it necessary to speak of it; yet, if we seek to determine its position relatively to the other cretaceous beds by means of the Foraminifers it con- tains, compared with living species, the faczes of the genera and species proves to us, that the chalk of Maestricht, of Fau- quemont (Belgium), of Tours, of Chavagne, and of Vendome, is above it; while, on the contrary, all the other beds are below it; thus in the chalk of Maestricht and the upper beds of the basins of the Loire, we recognize only genera still ex- isting, or at least occurring in tertiary tracts, while the white chalk of the Paris basin already exhibits to us different genera, such as Flabellina, Verneuilina, and Gaudryina, and a great number of species quite distinct. It would therefore be easy to establish, by means of the Foraminifers alone, the relative antiquity of the cretaceous beds; but we must previously make two geographical sections quite independent of each other, founded on the zoological forms; the first comprising the entire basin of the Seine, of the Loire, of Belgium, and of England, in which we find a striking analogy between the species found in all the beds, from the lowest to the highest, with a regular passage from one to the other; the second, comprising the West and South of France, in which the species of Foraminifers have not ouly no analogy with those of the other section, but in which, moreover, almost all the genera are different. If we seek an example of this fact, we shall find it on comparing the green sand of the environs of Mans with that of the mouth of the Charente. ‘The first, which in fact contains species approxi- mating to those of the white chalk of Paris, contains already several species analogous to those which have lived up to that bed; while the second, with perfectly distinct species, pre- sents to us genera different from all that we know in the cre- taceous beds of the North of France and of Belgium. The Foraminifers are sufficient to establish the following descending order of superposition in the cretaceous beds ;— of the White Chalk of the Paris Basin. 393 Group of the North of France and of Group of the West and South of Belgium. France. Upper chalk of Maestricht and Fau- quemont (Belgium). Coral chalk of Valognes and Nehou. Coral chalk of the basin of the Loire, at Vendome (Loir and Cher), at Chavagne (Maine and Loire), at Tours (Indre and Loire). White chalk of Ciply (Belgium). White chalk of Paris, of the depart- ments of Yonne and Aube, and of England. Nummulite chalk ef Royan (Charente Inférieure), of Saint Martory (Haute Garonne), of Saint Gaudens, &c. Coral chalk of Saintes (Charente Inféri- eure). Chalk marl of the Loire, with Gryphea Ammonite chalk of Martrous, near columba. Rochefort (with Gryphea columba). Caprine chalk of the Isle of Aix, of the Corbiéres (Aude). Green sand of Mans (Sarthe). Green sand of Fouras, of the Isle of Aix, and Corbiéres. Gault of the environs of Troyes (Aube). Neocomian tract of Aube. To establish zoologically what we have advanced, let us pass in review the succession of the genera, and endeavour to convey an idea of the modifications which have taken place in the Foraminifers of the cretaceous system, in the ascending order of the beds. At the epoch of the Neocomian formation we have hitherto found only the genus Textularia. The green sand presents, as we have said, two series of genera nearly distinct. “That of the mouth of the Charente contains the genera Dentalina, Cristellaria, Lituola, Alveolina, Chrysalidina, and Cuneolina; that of Mans, the genera Den- talina, Citharina, Frondicularia, Flabellina, Cristellaria, Bu- limina, and Guttulina. Hence we see, that, with the excep- tion of two genera common to both localities, all the rest are different in each of them. If we follow our examination of the succession of genera in the cretaceous groups of the South and the North, we shall find — 1, That in the South the same genera of the green sand are reproduced in the Caprine chalk. By degrees they pre- vail at length in the upper beds, and are reduced to the Cris- tellaria alone in the environs of Saintes; but near the mouth of the Gironde (at Royan) they are accompanied by the genera Nummulina and Guttulina, as well as on the whole line of the foot of the Pyrenees, at Saint Martory, at Saint Gaudens, extending into the department of Aude; thus pre- 394 Mr. Weaver on M. Alcide d’Orbigny’s View senting a zone well characterized by the abundance of Num- mulina, of which we have not found the analogue in the creta- ceous beds of the North of France. 2. That in the North the succession is far from taking place in the same manner; and that the Foraminifers, in much greater numbers, present a larger suite in superposition, with facts not less curious. ‘The genus Cztharina, which consti- tutes the greatest portion of the species in the oolite forma- tion, ceases with the green sand of Mans, being found no further in the cretaceous beds. In the chalk marl of the banks of the Loire we meet for the first time with the genus Lituola with the Dentalina; but all at once, in the white chalk, we observe a great number of species, among which, with all the genera and even some analogous species of the green sand of Mans, there appear for the first time on the globe the genera Nodosaria, Marginulina, Valvulina, Rotalina, Rosalina, Trun- catulina, Uvigerina, Verneuilina, Gaudryina, Globigerina, Py- rulina, Sagrina, Flabellina, and Frondicularia. These genera contain a considerable number of species; but with the white chalk the genus F/abellina ceases, which had continued hitherto from the green sand, and the genera Verneuilina and Gau- dryina, which first appear in the white chalk, also terminate with it; while in its interior the Frondicularia abound, as well as species whose cells form a pile on a single line. The white chalk of Ciply, although contemporaneous with that of the Paris basin, since it also contains Flabellina, does not present the same species, and may perhaps be a little higher in the series, but we have not as yet sufficient data to enable us to affirm this fact. In the beds which we consider higher in the series than the white chalk of Paris, namely, in the coral chalk of Tours, of Chavagne, and of Vendome, we meet for the first time with the genera Polystomella, Polymorphina and Globulina, yet accompanied with the same genera as those of the white chalk, with the exception of those whose discontinuance we have noticed; again, in the upper chalk of Maestricht and Fauquemont we have, with the three genera just mentioned, also the genera Nonionina, Fawasina, and Heterostegina. All are found living at present, or at least occurring in ter- tiary tracts; but we arrive at the last beds of the cretaceous group without having seen a single species of the Miliola of Lamarck (our order of Agathistégues), which, as we ascer- tained in 1825, only commences with the tertiary beds, and may be considered as the most certain sign of a change of formation. This rapid survey shows that in ascending from the lower of the White Chalk of the Paris Basin. 395 to the higher beds of the cretaceous group, the genera and species of Foraminifers progressively increase, and that the forms, at first very simple, analogous to those of oolitic tracts, afterwards more complicated and specially appropriate to the lower beds of the cretaceous system, have at last been replaced in the upper parts by forms still more varied, the whole re- curring in tertiary tracts, and even in the living state; facts 5 which it has appeared to us important to establish in the hi- story of Paleontology. M. A. d’Orbigny then proceeds to describe the species of Foraminifers found by him in the white chalk of the Paris basin. The following is a list of them, together with their localities :— Localities. 1. Nodosaria limbata ..........+. Meudon: very rare. UE enebinia acalestanieee Common at Sens: more rare at Meudon and in ‘ England. Meudon: rare. Its analogue is found fossil in 3. —— communis ...... the Subapennine tracts of Italy and Austria, and living in the Adriatic. SSRACHIS| | enscsencesee At Sens and in England. ie ROS: ae an spare at Sens, more rare at Meudon and St. Germain. 6. ————— Lorneiana ......... Only in the environs of Sens. Very common at Sens, Meudon, and St. Ger- 7. Ee ee oe ee te main, and in the chalk of England. : Found also in the green sand of the environs of Mans (Sarthe). 8 mnlGcecta 2: Sens, St. Germain: rare. Also at Maestricht F rarely. Common at Sens, very rare at Meudon, St. 9. Marginulina trilobata ..... ! Germain, and in England: found only in the young state. Meudon: very rare. Occurs also in the green Lok Sar Ran) pe acta sand in the environs of Mans. Common near Sens, very rare at Meudon and il elongata ......+5- ' St. Germain. Occurs also in the chalk of Ciply. 12, ————— gradata ......+++0. Only near Sens. 13. ———— raricosta .........+++ Meudon: very rare. 14. Frondicularia radiata .. ..... Meudon and St. Germain: very rare. 15. ———— elegans .........++. Meudon and Sens: very rare. 16 Seasiousdiniia Common at Sens, on the banks of the Yonne; . oh rare at St. Germain and Meudon. 17. ————— _Archiaciana ...... Meudon and Sens: rare. 18. ————— ornata .......sseeeses Found only once at Meudon. i9. —— tricarinata ......... Environs of Sens: seems to be rare. 20. ————— angulosa............ Meudon: very rare. 21. Flabellina rugosa ............ Sens and Meudon : common 22, ————— Baudouiniana.....Only at Sens. 23, ——-—— pulchra ............ Meudon: very rare. Very common in the white chalk of Meudon, 24, Cristellaria rotulata......... St. Germain, Sens, and in England. Occurs also in the green sand near Mans. 25 MAN ICH AN oan. acorns Sens and Meudon: rare. 26. —————- triangularis......... Sens: very rare. 27 VECtall hucewcesoe oad Meudon and St. Germain: rather rare. 396 Mr. Weaver on M. Alcide d’Orbigny’s View Localities. 28. Cristellaria Gaudryana ...... Only at St Germain: rare. Very common at Sens in the complete state, at St. Germain only young, and adult very 29. Lituola nautiloidea......... jarelyiat Mendon) @ccursralsolinthebetallc of England. EONAR Atalina Wolizigiaweeat Nee common at Meudon, St. Germain, and in ngland. 31. Michelinna’:.. Common at St. Germain, Meudon, and in ngland ; rare at Sens. Common at Meudon and St. Germain ; rare at Sens and in England ; common also in the oP tertiary tracts of Austria. Its analogue is 32. umbilicata ...... } found living at Rimini in the Adriatic, there being no difference between the fossil and L living species. St. Germain, Meudon, and England: rather 33. ————— CTASSA osceceorece Care. Tae St. Germain, England, and upper chalk of 34. Cordieriana Maestricht. ; 35. Globigerina cretacea ......++. St. Germain and England. 36. —————— elevatas..coreccoscces Common near Sens; rare in England. $7. Truncatulina Beaumontiana.Meudon and England: rare. Common at St. Germain and Meudon; rare at Pa : : 38. Rosalina Lorneiana ...... Sens and in England. 39 Clementiana ...... Rare at St. Germain, more common in England. 40. Valvulina gibbosa ............ St. Germain : rare. 41. Verneuilina tricarinata ...... St. Germain and Sens: rather rare. Le Very common at Meudon; rare at St. Germain 42. Bulimina obtusa............ and in England. - Very common at Meudon, St. Germain, Sens, 43. ————— obliqua ......... and in England. as iabili Very common at Sens; rare at Meudon, St. ° Ms a cae Germain, and in England. ; Very common at Meudon, St. Germain, and 45. ————— Drevis ....eceeeeee Sorig 46. ————— Murchisoniana ...St. Germain and England: rare. 47. Uvigerina tricarinata ......... Sens: very rare. Ae ina acuminata Very rare at Sens and St. Germain ; very com- pete es eee mon at Meudon. 49. Gaudryina rugosa ......... Meudon: St. Germain, and Sens: rather com- 50. aeatlos Ratber common at Meudon, Sens, St. Germain, 3 id aba a and in England. 5]. Textularia trochus ............ Only at Meudon. 59. Asie ain. «Nei Sens, Meudon, St. Germain, and England, without being common. 54> Baudoniniana.. se: St. Germain and Meudon: rare. 54. Sagrina rugosa ......... .. .«.5t. Germain and Meudon. From the preceding list it appears, that of the fifty-four species found in the white chalk of the Paris basin, thirty- eight occur at Meudon, thirty-three at Saint Germain, and twenty-eight at Sens: of these numbers, nzne are peculiar to Meudon, ¢wo to Saint Germain, and szz to Sens, while all the others are simultaneously common to two or three locali- ties, thus proving the perfect identity of the beds. It will be seen also, that of these fifty-four species, Zwenty-two are com- mon to the white chalk of England also. of the White Chalk of the Paris Basin. 397 Of the fifty-four species, seven occur also in lower or higher beds: thus in the green sand of Mans are found three spe- cies, Dentalina sulcata, Marginulina compressa, and Cristel- laria rotulata; in the coral chalk of Tours, which is higher in position than the white chalk, two species, Bulimina obtusa and Textularia turris 3 and in the chalk of Maestricht, being the highest in position, two species, Dentalina naligcodata and Rotalina Cordieriana. We also find two species, the analogues of which occur both fossil in the tertiary tracts of Austria and Italy, and in the living state in the Adriatic, namely, Dentalina communis and Rotalina umbilicata. With these exceptions there still remain forty-seven species peculiar to the white chalk, showing clearly that it forms a bed distinct from all the rest of the cretaceous system, belonging to a small local fauna well-defined. On comparing the above genera given by M. d’Orbigny with those named by Dr. Ehrenberg in his tabular view of the Bryozoa, inserted in the early part of this paper, it will be seen that Nodosaria, Dentalina, Marginulina, Frondicu- laria are included in the family of the Nodosarina of the latter author; Cristellaria, Rotalina, Truncatulina, included in his family of the Rotalina; Globigerina, Rosalina, Valvulina, Bulimina, Uvigerina, Pyrulina, in his family of the Uvellina; and Textularia in his family of the Textularina. The Lituola nautiloidea of Lamarck and d’Orbigny is the Coscinospira nautiloides of Ehrenberg, included in the Fabularina family of the latter. If we now, observes M. d’Orbigny, compare the fauna of the Foraminifers of the white chalk with those of different seas, with a view of determining the analogy of composition, and of obtaining data respecting the temperature of that basin at the time when these species lived, we shall find this analogy more striking in the Adriatic Sea than anywhere else. There only, the same as in the chalk, are found in abundance Nodosaria, Dentalina, Marginulina, Frondicularia; there only occur a considerable number of species of Bulimina., This sea alone in the present day contains living Frondicularia; of Fron- dicularia so varied in the white chalk; and, to complete the approximation, it exhibits to us the only two living spe- cies, the analogues of which are found in the fossil state in the white chalk, namely, Dentalina communis and Rotalina um- bilicata. This analogy of zoological forms would lead us to believe, Ist, that the basin in which is deposited the white chalk of Paris was subject to a warm temperature; 2nd, that it was circumscribed, protected from waves and from every violent current proceeding from a distance, since the bodies 398 Concluding Remarks. are deposited there without having experienced the slightest wearing previous to their becoming fossil; 3rd and lastly, that it extended to the whole of the white chalk of England. Concluding Remarks. The preceding extracts from the labours of Dr. Ehrenberg and M. A. d’Orbigny show that microscopic Polythalamia are found in all calcareous formations from the lias upward ; but in England they have been lately discovered in still deeper strata. Mr. Tennant was, I understand, the first to announce their discovery in 1839 in the mountain limestone of England. In 1840 they were also met with in the Kendal limestone, from which Mr. Lonsdale has prepared thin slices mounted on glass, which appear transparent under a strong light, ex- hibiting the crowded state of the microscopic Polythalamia in great perfection. Mr. Bowerbank also has been led to turn his attention to this subject by examining the siliceous bodies of the chalk, green sand, and oolites*. I had written thus far, when an interesting article by the Rev. Dr. Buckland, in reference to the researches of Dr. Ehren- berg up to 1839, met my eye, entitled, “On the agency of Animalcules in the formation of Limestonet,” which notices in particular the researches of MM. Tennant and Darker on this subject in the Derbyshire limestone and the Stonesfield slate, as well as the labours of Mr. Bowerbank, referred to above, and conveying judicious reflections. Dr. Buckland justly remarks, that in the application of the microscope from the living to the fossil Infusoria and Foraminifers we are commencing a new and important era in Paleontology. A very interesting branch of the inquiry will be to ascertain whether these microscopic bodies retain throughout a distinct- ive character in the several formations into whose composition they enter. In the unbounded field of nature presented to the consideration of the Microscopical Society of London lately established, no subject appears more worthy of their attention than an examination of the microscopic organic con- stituents of all the older limestone formations of the British Isles, as well as of other countries; and it is much to be de- sired that this attention may not be wanting, although the concurrence of many labourers may be required to reap a harvest of great promise, vet of indefinite extent. * Proceedings of the Geological Society, March 11, 1840. + Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, January to April, 1841. Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 399 XLI.— Report of the Results of Researches in Physiological Botany made in the year 1839. By F. J. Meyen, M.D., Professor of Botany in the University of Berlin. [Continued from p. 177.] 2. In the Cryptogams. M. Uneer* has published an interesting treatise on the structure and functions of the organs of fructification of Riccia glauca; he first notices the anatomical structure of the folia- ceous substance, and shows that the want of stomata is made up for by the loose conjunction of the cells on the surface (this formation of the upper cells is particularly evident in Riccia crystallina, Meyen). Then follows the description of the observations of the development of both kinds of organs of fertilization ; but the first stages of their appearance have not been observed, because, as M. Unger says, the proper time was already passed. The sporiferous organs (called Pistils, Meyen) always appear in a large air-cell, and are said to arise by the conjunction of a group of parenchymatous cells, which during their increase and enlargement form a cavity in their centre, which exhibited only one opening out- wards. ‘this bottle-shaped organ lengthens its neck until it reaches the surface of the thallus, and now the enlargement of the lower part of the sporangium commences (which is formed by the ovarium of the pistil). The contents of the sporan- gium appeared first as a homogeneous, colourless, fluid mat- ter, and as a granular substance ; this collected gradually in the middle, and then appeared as contents of that cellular tissue out of which the primitive cells of the spores are formed. It appeared also as a general fact, that at the periphery one layer of cells produces no spores in their interiors (here also a similar case of cells as in the formation of pollen in the anthers of the Phanerogams, M.). In the structure of the spores, M. Unger confirms the statement that the outer brown skin is not composed of cells, but is only a reticulate deposition of cellular matter. The other organs of generation, the so-called anthers, were not found in such great numbers; they were dispersed, and occurred singly. ‘They are said to consist in a regular sepa- ration of the parenchymatous cells of the thallus: here also the contents form a granular substance, which appears in the * Anatomische Untersuchung der Fortpflangungstheile von Riccia glauca, Linnza, p. 1 to 17. 400 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. form of cells of extraordinary smallness, as in the anthers of the Mosses. M. Unger draws the following results from his observa- tions :— Ist. That the original development in Riccia glauca of both those organs is simultaneous, and that they therefore seem to have a nearer relation to each other. 2nd. That both organs represent cavities formed from cellular tissue, which are provided with lengthened openings, and that therefore a material communication of their contents is not improbable. 3rd. That the function of the neck-shaped passage of the sporangium is confined to the earliest period of its develop- ment, etc., and that, finally, the transference of the contents of the anthers to the sporangia is a cause of the formation of spores. M. Mohl has published some new and very fruitful obser- vations on the development of the spores of the Jungerman- nie: he chose for his experiments Anthoceros levis, in which the primitive spore contains but few globules, which renders the progress of the formation easier to follow. The youngest primitive cells which M. Mohl found appeared as transparent, partly spherical cells, in which one could observe a cell-nucleus, as in the phanerogamic plants. Afterwards a gummy substance was formed round the dise of the nucleus, and this finally covers more than half of it; the green granules appear more plainly, and the mass divides into two parts. At the edges this green mass passes into a colourless, gummy, but fine granular substance, which forms larger or smaller meshes; M. Mohl compares this substance very correctly to the bladders of foam. After this divided green mass has gradually increased, these two halves divide again into two parts, and thus four nuclei, lying close to each other, are formed (grain-cells, M. Mohl calls them), in which change the true cell-nucleus takes no part, but hes separated by itself. At the same time the side of the primitive cells thickens, and adopts the form of the well-known mucous substance, and now follows the division of its cavity. Lines are formed on the inner surface of the primitive cell, which are correctly represented as projecting edges, which after- wards grow towards the middle of the cell between two masses of granules, and join together. After this division, nothing is visible of the nucleus. A short time after the division of the primitive cell, the formation of the spore-cuti- cle commences, namely, in each of the four compartments, and the granular masses lie in the interior of each of these new-formed cells, and are fastened by threads of gum to the Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 401 circumference of the spore-cuticle. The remaining observa- tions agree with the results of former ones, and are already known. A series of excellent delineations accompanies the paper. M. Mohl then proceeds to compare his view of the formation of the spores with that of M. de Mirbel. Accord- ing to the view of the latter, the formation of the spores depends principally on the primitive cell, for the contents are divided mechanically into four parts by the projecting partitions. According to M. Mohl’s earlier idea, the develop- ment of four spores in a primitive cell depends solely on the organic change of the contents; but his late observations on Anthoceros appear to support an intermediate view, for the development of the partitions is produced by that of the con- tents of the primitive cell. Finally, M. Mohl endeavours to show that no great importance must be attributed to the cir- cumstance of the four divisions of the primitive cell communi- cating with each other or not, and that we must not consider this process as a characteristic distinction between the primi- tive cells of the spores and those of the pollen-grains. In An- thoceros levis M. Mohl could not observe this division; in Anth. punctatus he thinks he saw it, and also in Jungermannia epiphylla, but not in Riccia glauca. I have published the re- sults of some new observations on the formation of the spores of Aneura pinguis, which may be regarded as a sequel to those spoken of in the third volume of my ‘ Physiology’ (Berlin, 1839). In the first stages of the fruit there were found only very tender long cells, which were imbedded in a gummy matter ; these cells enlarged, and at length lay close to each other, and at a later period it was seen that from these at first perfectly homogeneous cells, not only the elaters, but also the spores, were formed ; some become elaters, and others undergo a series of changes, until at length the spores are produced. The cell out of whose division four spores are always produced, I have called primitive spore (Mutter- spore), and of these primitive spores, three, four, or even five are formed in each tubular cell; whilst those neighbouring cells which afterwards produce the formation-tunic retain their granular contents unchanged, until the spores are per- fectly developed. As soon as the primitive spores are formed, a gelatinous membrane appears at their periphery; this has been called primitive cell ; I designate it as formation-tunic or skin (Bildungsbriille). Some time afterwards I observed two, three, or even four primitive spores enclosed in their forma- tion-tunics, connected with each other in a row, and occupy- ing the place of the original tubular cell, but from want of material I could not determine whether these formation- Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2D 402 Meyen’s Report for 1839 an Physiological Botany. tunics were derived from the single members into which the primitive tubular cell may by transverse division be dissolved, or whether, as appeared in some cases, the primitive spores with their coverings make their appearance within the tubu- lar cell, whose sides are then absorbed. The drawings ac- companying the article will make this clearer. Sometimes only a part of the tube is changed into primitive spores, etc., and the rest remains undeveloped in one of the primitive cells of its own tube, by which the appearance of stalks sometimes seen on the single primitive cells is explained: as the primi- tive cell is absorbed, they also disappear. In several fruits of Aneura pinguis 1 was able to observe, at the time when the division of the primitive spore by the contraction of the sides takes place, the existence of a second formation-tunic (it was not the inner surface of the outer one), but neither of them took any part in the division of the spore, as is seen in the delineations. However, last winter I observed that they did take part in the division of the spores in individuals of Aneura pinguis (the large turf variety), inasmuch as the gela- tinous membrane entered into the contractions of the mem- branes of the primitive spores, but was never completely separated, as is the case with Pe/lia epiphylla. Whether in Aneura the formation of nuclei precedes the division of the primitive spore into four others cannvut be observed, inas- much as these cells are filled with a green matter which pre- vents our seeing the internal process: I have also not been able to observe it in Pellia epiphylia, Sphagnum palustre, ete. Directly after the production of the spore by division, each one exhibited a peculiar formation-tunic, just the same as the pollen-grains ; at a later period both the common forma- tion-coverings, as also the special ones, are absorbed, and then the spores lie singly between the tubular cells, which at this time change into elaters *. In the past year M. Klotzsch has described a series of Fungi, and accompanied his descriptions with excellent de- lineations+; in this work (to plate 473) we have a division of the Hymenomycete according to the new observations on the structure of the hymenium. ‘The Hymenomycete may be divided into two groups: Exospore, with free stalked spores, and Entospore, with enclosed unstalked spores. The first division is resolved into the Tetrasporidei, where the straight * The plant used for the above observations was the so-called 7richo- stylium arenarium ; but I have convinced myself that Corda’s genus Tricho- stylium is the same as Aneura, for the small column which occurs in 7'7i- chostylium also belongs to Aneura. + Aeb. Dietrichs Florades Konigreichs Preussen, vii., Berlin, 1839, tab. 457-476. Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 403 spores are developed in fours, and only by way of exception in twos, threes and sixes; and the Monosporidei, where the long bent spores are always developed singly on spike-formed supports: the genus Hnidia belongs to this group. Interesting is the information that many tuberose Fungi, as, for instance, the genera Gauteria, Vallad., Hydnangium, Wallr., and Hymenangium, Kl. (Tuber album, Bull.), belong to the true Hymenomycete, and indeed to the Exospore ; in these Fungi the hymenium covers the surface of the cavities which are found in their fleshy substance. In describing the Moschelia esculenta, M. Klotzsch calls the paraphyses of authors anthers; and of Spherosoma ( fuscescens) he says, that the anthers, when they appear in the Octosporidei, always project above the surface of the tube- skin (Schlauchkant), and therefore he does not reckon the paraphyses of Spherosoma fuscescens (plate 464) as an- thers, iasmuch as they do not project above the surface. I must here call to mind Carus’s notice of a difference of gender in Pyronema Marianum, where the yellow colour of the whole surface of the fungus is derived from the con- tents of the paraphysz, or anther-like organs. Dr. Redmann Coxe has sent to the Linnzan Society his ‘Observations on some Fungi or Agarici*, which by deli- quescence forms an inky fluid, drying into a bistre- coloured mass, capable of being used as a water-colour for drawings, and of a very indestructible nature, by means of common agencies. M. Morren+ has communicated some observations on the structure and colouring of Agaricus epixylon, DeC. As re- gards the colour, he says that the colouring substance is formed quite differently in Fungi to what it is in other plants ; in the above-mentioned Agaricus the blue colour of the pileus is produced by a few spherical globules contained in the tubes of the tissue. These globules are not changed by iodine. In the deeper-seated layers of cells the globules are less numerous, and in the tubes of the white flesh of the mushroom they are not to be found. The tissue of the above- mentioned fungus is said to consist solely of anastomosing vessels, which have sometimes nodular swellings, and are ge- nerally forked, but seldom triramified : these vessels are long, cylindrical, anastomosing tubes; they contain a fluid and globules, and have here and there partitions. The tubes are of great length, and form a woolly tissue, and cannot there- * Annals of Natural History, June 1839, p. 258. + Notice sur lhistologie de l’Agaricus epixylon. Bulletin de l’Académie Royale de Bruxelles, vi. No. 1. 2D2 404 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. fore be reckoned to the parenchym; they appear most similar to the lacteous vessels, and form a true vascular tissue. One might place this fungous tissue together with the lacteous vessels (to which M. Morren has given the name of Cinen- chyme, xivnzvs); but as it differs from these in the want of the circulation, as well as in its woolly interwoven appear- ance, M. Morren has called it Dadalenchyme. I cannot agree with M. Morren’s views of the nature of the fungous tissue: I consider it as cellular tissue, and have already described it (Phytotomy, 30, p. 138) as a peculiar form of irregular cellular tissue under the name of Felt- tissue. The cells are often long and branched, but the par- titions which change these tubes into cells cannot be over- looked. Several kinds of regular cellular tissue are found in Fungi. M. Morren observed a spontaneous motion in the spores of Agaricus epixylon as soon as put into water. [This motion has however been already observed, and has been seen even in dry fungus-spores.—Meyen. | In the foregoing Reports we have often made mention of a fungus formation which of late years has attracted so much attention, viz. Fermentation fungus: I have often attempted to prove that it is improbable that this fungus should be the cause of fermentation, although always found in ferment- ing liquids; but the fact of their being plants appears, to me at least, to have been fully proved by the observations on their increase and growth. However, M. Liebig*, in a trea- tise on Fermentation, etc., has declared those statements of the vegetable nature of the fermentation formations to be a delusion; and considers that gluten and albumen, which, during the fermentation of beer and vegetable saps, are sepa- rated in a changed state, appear in the form of globules, which swim about either singly or several together, and that these globules have been mistaken by natural philoso- phers for Infusoriz and Fungi. Indeed, says Liebig, the idea that they are animals or plants disproves itself, for in pure sugar-water the seeds of the plants disappear during fermentation ; the fermentation takes place without the ap- pearance of a development or reproduction of the seeds, plants or animals which have been regarded by philosophers as the cause of the chemical process. I am not aware upon whose observations Liebig grounds these latter statements ; probably they are his own, which, however, must evidently give way to the more correct ones of his predecessors. * Uber Gahrung Faulniss und Verwesungund ihre Ursachen. Annalen der Pharmacie, 1539. Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 405 M. Balsamo Crivelli has published some new observa- tions on the origin and development of Botrytis Bassiana*, and of another parasitic kind of mould, a subject which was treated of in our Report for 1836 (Berlin, 1837, p.107). M. _ Crivelli found that the vesicles of which the fat consists can pass into Botrytis, and he convinced himself that the “ corps vésiculaires” of M. Audouin were nothing more than swim- ming fat globules. A cut was made in the side of a fat caterpillar, and the exuding sap exhibited the supposed vesi- cular bodies of Audouin, which were certainly nothing but globules of fat. The following morning the interior of the caterpillar was covered with Ascophora mucedo. The spores of Ascophora were introduced into the bodies of four chry- salises, and three days afterwards the grains of fat could be seen full of vegetating filaments. Finally, M. Crivelli re- tains his idea, that in the fat of the silkworm there can take place such changes as to render its component parts capable of spontaneously producing mould, which property the fat may then impart to healthy caterpillars. M. Turpint+ explains why butter which has been melted and allowed to cool becomes so seldom mouldy: the treatise is of great length, for he mentions a number of cases in which mouldiness was observed without being able to assume that the seeds proceeded from the air; also the microscopical structure of butter, both before and after its fusion, is most circumstantially described. The following points may be mentioned : the mould which, in common butter, is produced from the lacteous globules contained therein cannot be pro- duced in melted butter, because these globules are then covered with the oil of butter. M. Turpin remarks, that the explanation of the production of mould on the surface of or- ganic matter by a continual ‘rain’ of seeds of all kinds of mould must at present appear ridiculous; but that the ex- planation by ‘ generatio spontanea’” must be very limited, and also more clearly defined. Nature produces the mould in two ways: either directly out of the globuline of organic matter when this has ceased to be under the influence of vitality, or from spores which it produces itself. M. Hanover} has made ‘Observations on a Contagious Conferva Formation on the Water Salamanders ;’ he saw the * Communicated by Freiherr von Cesati in the Linnza of 1839, p. 118- 123. + Sur le singulier caractére physique et microscopique que prend le beurre, ete. Comptes Rendus du 9 Dec., p. 748-762. t Miiller’s Archiv fiir Anatomie, 1839, Heft 5. 406 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. production of Conferve on an anatomized specimen of ‘ Tri- ton punctatus’ while under water. Similar formations were observed on a dead salamander, a dead fly, and on the sur- face of several wounds which were made on living salaman- ders ; sometimes the formation took place without there being any injury, e. g. on the toes, by which the toes attacked were destroyed. [The plant observed by M. Hanover is the Achlya prolifera, Nees v. Esenbeck ; and if, as M. H. says, M. Carus’s figures do not agree with his plants, perhaps those will which I gave to Gothe’s § Mittheilunger aus der Pflangenwelt’ (S. Nova Acta Acad. C. L. C. tom. xv. pt. ii. p. 374, etc. tab. i. xxix.), and in other places. I have seen this fungus under similar circumstances on flies, spiders, earthworms, Planariz, dead frogs, and even on putrifying Viscum album ; and have shown, in Wiegmann’s Archiv, etc., 1835, ii. p. 354, that the little fungus which is formed about autumn on the body of the common house-fly has spores which germinate, and in water grow out into Achlya prolifera. The seed-formation and the germination of the Ach/lya spores were observed and repre- sented in the above plate, as also in my ‘ Physiology,’ 1. tab. x. fig. 18 and 19.—Meyen. | M. Hanover inoculated the above plant on the back of a healthy animal, and saw that the formation of Conferve had commenced at the end of sixteen hours, but fell off with the epidermis. The experiments were frequently repeated, but it was always found that the development of the plant was not injurious to the life of the animal. Moreover, M. H. re- marked that the inoculation succeeded better with unripe than with ripe Conferve. As I have occupied myself very considerably with this subject, I may be allowed to mention my observations with- out prejudice. The moculation effected by M. Hanover is nothing more than a common propagation ; the ripe plants afforded seeds, out of which other plants were produced, and the so-called unripe Conferve increased their single threads, as is done by the order Achlya among the water Fungi, and by Vaucheria among the Conferve. The growth of the fungous threads from the mucous surface of the Trifonie cannot be injurious ; they grow like mould from dispersed spores. But just as the lower moulds are produced not only from spores, but also in a manner as yet unknown to us, so it is the case with Achlya prolifera and the Isarie; they are moulds, which are de- veloped as a product of a sickly state of the animal; the disease itself is deep-seated, for the animals generally die of Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison. 407 it. When this mould is once formed, it propagates itself by spores. Such diseases are probably not rare, and only of im- portance to the animals. I have lately observed a disease of the Vibrio, out of whose body a very beautiful but small microscopical mould was developed, from which they died ; the animals twist themselves in all directions, and try to get rid of the diseased product, but in vain; at length they be- come quiet and die. [To be continued. ] XLII.—On the Urari, the Arrow Poison of the Indians of Guiana; with a description of the Plant from which ié is extracted. By Rosert H. ScuompBurek, Esq.*. More than two centuries have elapsed since the curiosity of Europe was raised to become acquainted with the plant from the juice of which the Indians make their celebrated Urari poison ; and as the preparation has been enveloped in great mystery, all the attempts hitherto made have only added con- siderably to the wish of the learned in Kurope to be able to sift the true from the fabulous accounts. Raleigh appears to have been the first who heard of this substance, with which the Aborigines poisoned their arrows for war and the chase; and Father Gumilla observes, that “its principal ingredient was furnished by a subterraneous plant, a tuberose root, which never puts forth leaves, and which is called the root by way of eminence, raiz de si misma ; that the pernicious exhalations which arise from the pots cause the old women to perish who are chosen to watch over this operation ; finally, that these vegetable juices never are considered as sufficiently concentrated till a few drops pro- duce at adistance a repulsive action on the blood. An Indian wounds himself slightly, and a dart dipped in the liquid Cu- rare is held near the wound ; if it makes the blood return to the vessels without having been ‘brought into contact with them, the poison is judged to be sufficiently concentrated.” Not less eccentric are the accounts which we receive from Hartzinck+, who was informed that, in order to try whether the poison be good, a poisoned arrow is shot into a young tree ; if the tree shed its leaves in the course of three days the poison is considered strong enough. He observes further, that in the last rebellion of the Negroes in Berbice, a woman * Communicated by the Author. + Beschryving van Guiana, door J. J. Hartzinck, ete. Amsterdam, 1770, vol. i. p. 13. 408 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison, who carried her child on her back was shot with a poisoned arrow, and though the child was not wounded, it began to swell, and died a short time after. At the commencement of the 19th century Baron de Hum- boldt gave an authentic account of the preparation of that poison and its effects ; but later travellers, not contented with the simple method of its preparation, covered it anew with the veil of mystery, and it was thought that “the vegetable extract was merely the medium through which the poison is conveyed—the common Wooraly owing its poisonous quality to the infusion of the large ants, called Muneery, and the stronger kind from the fangs of venomous reptiles, particu- larly the Coony Coochy, which is the most venomous of all known snakes *.” The author of ‘ Wanderings in South Ame- rica, Mr. Charles Waterton, gives a similar account of its preparation. He says, “a day or two before the Macoushi Indian prepares his poison, he goes into the forest in quest of the ingredients. A vine grows in these wilds, which is called Wourali. It is from this that the poison takes its name, and it is the principal ingredient. When he has procured enough of this, he digs up a root of a very bitter taste, ties them to- gether, and then looks about for two kinds of bulbous plants, which contain a green and gelatinous juice. He fills a little quake which he carries on his back with the stalks of this, and lastly ranges up and down till he finds two species of ants. One of them is very large and black, and so venomous that its sting produces a fever: it is most commonly to be met with on the ground. The other is a little red ant which stings like a nettle, and has its nest under the leaf of a shrub. After obtaining these, he has no more need to range the forest. A quantity of the strongest Indian pepper is used, but this he has already planted round his hut. The pounded fangs of the Labarri Snake, and those of the Conna Couchi, are likewise added. ‘These he commonly has in store; for when he kills a snake, he generally extracts the fangs, and keeps them by him}+.” This is the adorned story of the ingredients for the preparation of the Urari, and rests upon the fictitious accounts which these travellers may have received, but surely not upon personal experience. These various accounts, so contradictory as regards the mode of preparation and the origin of the poison, were well calculated to raise in me the desire of removing the mystery connected with it; and I was fortunate enough to accomplish my wish during my first expedition in the interior of British * Montgomery Martin’s ‘ History of the British Colonies,’ vol. ii. p. 47. + ‘Wanderings in South America,’ by Charles Waterton, Esq., p. 55. and the Plant from which it is extracted. 409 Guiana. I collected at Pirara, the largest Macusi village I ever visited, every information on the subject, and the result was, that the plant grew on the Conocon or Canuku moun- tains. On our return from the cataract of the Rupununi, I ascertained at a settlement of Wapisiana Indians on the east- ern bank of the Rupununi, in 3° north latitude, that a journey of one day and a half would bring me there. After I had engaged some guides, I started, accompanied by Lieut. Haining of the 65th Regiment, in the morning of the 25th of December, in search of the mysterious plant. Our way led us first to the south, over pathless savannahs, until we met with a place in the Rupununi where we could ford it. As the mountains stretched their foot to the river’s bank, we expected that the ascent would immediately com- mence. Our guide, however, led us through a mountain-pass, and before us was a large arid savannah. We turned now to the north, meeting with plains covered with wood, or low shrubs and coarse grass, bounded on both sides by the moun- tains; it was a wild road, crossed frequently by streams, some of which were dried up and others ran turbulently over numerous rocks: their banks were clothed with creepers and twiners, of the extensive families of Convolvulacee, Bignoni- acee and Eupatorie: a beautiful reed raised its panicle high above the creeping plants; it was the Gynerium saccharoides, which the Indians use for their arrows. At last, after we had walked more than five miles, the ex- tent of the valley from the place where we entered it, the ascent commenced. It was by no means an easy matter: the path, Indian-like, quite narrow, led over fallen trees, between boulders of granite, and was often so steep that we had to use hands and feet. I wondered only how the Indians, with their burthens, could climb up. Mountain-streams had made their way over shelves of granite, forming frequent cascades, which during the rainy season must be grand indeed; at present, the water only trickled down the rugged sides, and was lost among numerous plants of the genera Pothos, Heliconia, Ges- neria, Peperoma and Canna, which, favoured by the moisture, grew most luxuriantly. A Justicia with scarlet flowers, the beautiful Petrea macrostachya (8.), and the Duranta with its violet blossoms, added considerably to the beauty of the spot. SAS three o’clock in the afternoon, after a most fatiguing march of eight hours and a half, we reached a few huts on Mount Mamesua, inhabited by Wapisianas, where we in- tended to rest for the night. We continued our inquiries, and learned from our host Oronappi, an old acquaintance, 410 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison, whom we had met a few weeks ago in the valley, that he him- self knew how to prepare the poison, and that he would wil- lingly accompany our guide and bring the plant for our in- spection. This proposal did not agree with my plans. I was anxious to see the plant in its native growth, and when we gave him to understand that it was our intention to accompany him, he attempted by signs to make us desist from going with him. He told us that the path was very bad, and that it was so far that we could not reach the place till afternoon, and that we would have to sleep on the road ; he repeated the same story in the morning, and as he observed that we were determined to insist on our first plan, he made a sour face and did not speak for a length of time. Whether he thought that we were not able to stand the fatigues, or whether he wished us not to learn the place where the plant grew, I know not: enough of his stories—we found the first only true; the path was wretched; all traces of it were frequently lost, and an Indian only could have guided us; and he directed his course mostly by broken branches, or marks cut in the trees, sometimes standing still for some moments to consider in which direction to turn. Our path was over “hill and dale,” mostly in a N.N.W. and N.W. direction. It became every moment wilder: we had to cross several mountain-streams, which flowed in deep beds, precipitating at their banks a ferruginous matter ; underbush became scarce ; it appeared as if Nature here de- lighted only in gigantic forms. Our Indians thought they had mistaken the track; but as we arrived at a stream which ran rapidly over the sloping ground, exhibiting granitic shelves, we observed that several paths united ; and crossing the brook our guides stopped, and pointing to a ligneous twimer which wound itself snake-like from tree to tree, they called out “ Urari,” the name of the plant in the tongue of our guides*. * Sir Walter Raleigh, in his table of names, rivers, ete. discovered in his second Guiana Voyage (Hakeluyt’s Voyages, ii. 692), mentions even then, among the poisons used by the Indians of the Crinoco, the Ourari; and by that name it is almost exclusively called by the Indians of Guiana. The Caribs in pronouncing the 7 frequently exchange this letter with /, and it may thus have happened that the name Wurali has crept in. The Macusis, who are acknowledged to be the best manufacturers of this remarkable substance, call it decidedly Urari. The same name it bears among the Tarumas, Wa- pisianas, Aricunas, Woyawais, Atorais, and various other tribes of the in- terior whom I have visited. ‘The substitution of the corrupted name Wou- rali is therefore, to say the least of it, gratuitous, and ought to be rejected. Von Martius and Von Spix, in their ‘ Travels in Brazil,’ observe that, during their exploring tours up the Amazon, Yupura, Rio Negro, etc., they heard it pronounced Urari, but never Wurali. (See Reise in Brasilien Miinchen, and the Plant from which it is extracted. 411 My wish was thus realized ; and that plant which Baron de Humboldt was prevented from seeing, and which was one of the chief objects of Mr.Waterton’s ‘ Wanderings,’ but without success, I now saw before me. Baron de Humboldt, with his usual sagacity, observes, “ The danger of the Curare, as of most other Strychnee (for we continue to believe that the Mavacure belongs to a neighbouring family), results only from the action of the poison on the vascular system *.” Though I did not find the plant in flower, it was bearing fruit, and their inspection assured me that, as Von Humboldt suspected, the plant belongs to the genus Strychnost+. It forms No. 155 of my Guiana plants, and is thus characterized by Mr. Bentham :—“ Strychnos toxifera, Schomb., Hook. Ic. Pl. t. 364 and 365 ; ramis scandentibus cirrhisque pilis longis patentibus rufis dense obtectis, foliis sessilibus ovali-oblongis acuminatis membranaceis trinerviis utrinque pilis longis rufis hirsatis, floribus...... fructibus maximis globosis.—Folia 3—4-pollicaria.” The Strychnos toxifera, as I have called it, the Urari of the Macusi and Wapisiana Indians, is a native of South America, and a sporadic plant; and, as far as known to us, has been hitherto found only in the granitic mountains of Canuku or Conocon, in latitude 3° 10’ N., a group of mountains which border the extensive savannahs of the rivers Rupununi, Mahu and Takutu. It is a ligneous twiner: at its root, of the thick- ness of a man’s arm, and covered with a rough ash-coloured bark, marked with fissures; winding itself to the neighbour- 1831, vol. iii. p. 1155.) The compound terms Uraricapara and Uraricuera (Parima), two rivers, the former the tributary of the latter, and which we find under these names in the oldest maps we possess of these regions, is another argument in favour of Urari. The arrow poison is generally known in En- gland under the name ef Wouraly, a name by which Mr. Waterton, in his ‘ Wanderings,’ has described it ; but interesting as his description may prove to the general reader, and however delightful the picture he draws of his various exploits, it is a work which never will be consulted as authority in scientific questions. * Personal Narrative, vol. v. part il. p. 527. + The chief ingredient of the arrow poison of the Indians of the Yuppura is, according to Von Martius, the bark of a slender tree, which, in the T upi tongue, is called Urari-iwa, the Ronhamon gujanensis of Aublet. A plant which forms one of the ingredients in the preparation of the Macusi poison, and which, in many respects, agrees with Aublet’s figure, has been named by Mr. Bentham, in the enumeration of my Guiana plants, Strychnos cogens. However, the Urari plant of the Macusis, although belonging to the same genus, differs in numerous specific points. (Compare Yon Martius, Reise in Brasilien, vol. iii. p. 1237.) I have little doubt, that the plant of which the Indians by Esmeralda prepare their poison, is Aublet’s Ronhkamon, and in this I am confirmed by a conversation with Dr. Kunth in Berlin, who, as is well known, determined Von Humboldt’s plants. 412. Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison, ing trees, and reaches often a height of thirty to forty feet be- fore it divides into branches. The latter are rounded and op- posite, the branchlets densely covered with ferruginous hair. Between the branches and lkewise between the leaves there appear spiral tendrils, mostly single, but sometimes divided. The branchlets prove sometimes abortive on one side, and are then replaced by the cirrhus, which in that case becomes leaf- bearing. Organs of a peculiar structure, apparently gem- mulze, are found below the base of the branchlets as well as on the branch itself; on the outside they are closely set with hair, on the inside smooth and coriaceous and of a spatulate form. They are not peculiar to every branch, but mostly to be found on the branchlet by which it is terminated. The leaves are opposite, ovate-oblong, acuminate, short-petioled, entire, three to five-nerved, ciliate, membranaceous, and co- vered with ferruginous hair, which is thicker set between each pair of petioles; the leaves differ in size from one inch and a half to four inches and a half, and are from one to two inches broad, the stalk being only two lines. As already observed, the plant was not in flower in Decem- ber, and had just begun to drop its fruit, which were on long stalks ; and the rudiments of a five-cleft calyx and an inferior corolla were easily perceptible. The fruit is a berry of the size of a large apple, being fre- quently twelve inches in circumference; it is globular, and covered with a smooth hard rind of a bluish green colour and filled with a soft jelly-like pulp, in which the seeds, ten to fifteen in number, are immersed. They are round, concavo- convex, about an inch in diameter, and five to six lines thick ; from the circumference five rays extend towards the promi- nence in the middle. They are of a grey colour and rough; the internal kernel is a yellowish white, and tough, like horn. This substance, according to Indian information, possesses intense bitter and medicinal properties ; it is used by the In- dians against pain in the stomach, dysentery, and as a tonic. We observed many heaps of the cut wood covered with palm-leaves, which we were told had been left by the Macusis, who come to this place from a great distance, as the plant is known to grow only in two or three situations at the Canuku mountains ; they are therefore resorted to by the Indians from all quarters. The Wapisianas and Macusis are generally acknowledged to be the best manufacturers of the poison; and from the corroborative testimony of these tribes, I have gathered the following particulars respecting its preparation. It is only the bark of the woody parts and its alburnum and the Plant from which it is extracted. 413 which are considered to possess the poisonous principle in the highest degree. The stem of the plant is therefore cut into pieces about three feet in length, of which the bark is stripped, and after having been pounded it is steeped in water, for which purpose a new earthen vessel is used; here they allow it to remain for some time, well covered, until the water is of a yellowish colour, when it is filtered through a funnel- shaped matappa lined with plantain-leaves. Several other plants have been meanwhile procured, and after their juice has been extracted in a similar manner, this extract is kept ready to be added to the former at the moment it has been concentrated on a slow fire to the consistency of a syrup. The addition of that juice gives a darker colour to the Urari, which, from the time of its becoming concentrated, has the appearance of tar: it is now put into small calabashes, which are covered with leaves to prevent the poison from coming in immediate contact with the air. The Indians pretend, that if it be well preserved it will keep its strength for a couple of years. If it is to be used, the quantity required is put into a separate calabash, and a little juice of the Cassada is added to it to make it more pliable. I was told that the addition of Cassada-water (as the expressed juice of the poisonous root of the Jatropha manihot is termed) reawakens the slumbering powers of the poison. After that juice has been added to it, the Indian buries the calabash with the poison for a day or two under ground. This is the unadorned account of the preparation of the Urari, and the method which is followed by the Macusis at and about Pirara, and the Wapisianas of the Canuku moun- tains, where the plant grows. There appears to be no danger whatever in the preparation, and the vapours which are dis- engaged are entirely innocent; but the circumstance that it requires several days to watch the pot closely on the fire and to take off the scum, etc. before it is properly concentrated, as well as the superstitious customs with which the poison- maker, for his own advantage, surrounds the preparation of it, prevent the Indian, with his natural indolence, from making it more than once or twice a year. I undertook in 1837 another expedition in the interior of Guiana, and found opportunity to revisit the regions which, in consequence of the arrow poison, had been previously of interest tome. That interest had not been abated—nay, it was increased. The belief continued to prevail among the colonists of Demerara, that the active poison of the Urari was “snake-teeth and stinging ants ;’ and my assertions, that the vegetable juice of the plant employed produced the 414 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison, fatal effect, and that it contained no animal principle, were doubted. It became evident that the more mysterious ac- counts of former authors had taken too firm a root to give my plain tale a chance of finding credit. It was certainly true I had not been present at the time of preparation, and although in my own mind I doubted not the Indian’s informa- tion, I could not implant that faith into others. During our stay in Pirara, a Macusi village on the classical soil of Raleigh’s and Keymis’s El Dorado, I ascertained that an Indian lived in the vicinity, who was far-famed for the pre- paration of the Urari poison. I induced him by presents of some consideration to prepare it in my presence, and he pro- mised to do so. I accompanied him for that purpose to the Canuku mountains, partly with the object of being present at the gathering of the chief ingredient, and partly to see whether I might be fortunate enough to find the plant which is called Urari in blossom. In the latter object I was disappointed : I found it again, as during my first visit, fruit-bearing. The mountain Ilamickipang had been named as the place nearest to Pirara where the plant grew, being about eighteen miles distant in a south-eastern direction from the spot where we collected it in 1835. We ascended the mountain for about 1500 feet, and though we observed numerous Urari plants at a less height, our sapient chemist, after having tried different pieces of the stem, pronounced it not to be in a state fit for preparation. After we had reached a saddle of the mountain, a spot was selected, where, with the assistance of our Indians, we built a hut of palm-leaves, and from hence short excursions in different directions were undertaken, to collect such plants as possessed the sap in a high degree. They were found generally in rocky places or glens, among heaped-up boulders of granite, places well selected by a plant which is so fatal in its effects. The branches and ligneous stems, which were in thickness less than the human wrist, were chosen and carried into the hut, where they were scraped, and the bark was preserved in small baskets made for that purpose. Three such baskets were filled, when our chemist considered that he had enough, and the baskets were delivered up to me, and we returned to Pirara. The manufacturing of the poison was however delayed for some days, for the object, as I was told by the chemist, of observing previously a rigid fast, in order to prepare himself for the important business. Meanwhile Kanaima, an influential Macusi chief from the Rupununi, arrived on a visit in Pirara, and for what purpose I know not: it is enough to state, that he knew how to pre- vail so far upon the manufacturer of the poison that he re- and the Plant from which it is extracted. 415 tracted his promise, and refused to prepare it in my presence. However, the bark was in my keeping, and as I had paid for it, I considered myself to have a full right to it ; and although he demanded it back, it was now my turn to refuse him. We were at that period so near our departure for Fort San Joaquim, that I was prevented from engaging a more willing concocter, and with the pure bark in my possession we de- parted. The dreary “ winter season,” as the time when the tropical rains descend in torrents is calied by the Brazilians, gave me sufficient leisure to enter into further inquiries with regard to this poison, and I resolved to make some experiments how far the pure bark of the Urari plant, Strychnos toxifera, un- mixed with any other substance, might prove fatal to animal life. I took, therefore, two pounds of the bark shavings, and having poured a gallon of water on it, allowed it to remain in that state for twenty-four hours. Half of it was filtered off, and keeping a steady but gentle coal fire, it was boiled in a new pot, adding from time to time more of the infusion. After having concentrated it by boiling to the consistence of thin syrup, and having allowed it to cool, two arrows were poisoned with this substance, and two fowls wounded, one in the thigh and the other in the neck. The effects became apparent after five minutes: the first died in twenty-seven minutes after the wound had been inflicted; and the latter, which had been wounded in the neck, after twenty-eight minutes. The gentleman who accompanied me on my expe- dition, and Senhor Pedro Ayres, who had been sent by the commander of the district to welcome us at the Brazilian boundary, were present during these experiments, and it is therefore established beyond doubt, that the Urari plant alone, without any assistance of Indian charlatanism, or the addition of extraneous substances not likely to add to its efficacy, pro- duces the fatal effect. The boiling process was finished in less than seven hours, while the Indians employ more than forty-eight hours for that purpose ; and as it required a period rather longer to produce death in the fowls wounded with it than would have been necessary with good Macusi poison, this must be ascribed to our decoction being not sufficiently concentrated. The poison which I had thus prepared was of a brownish colour: good Macusi poison is jet-black, and I have no doubt that it receives this appearance from one of the ingredients which the Indians add to it. When I left Pirara, foiled in my purpose to see the poison prepared by the Macusi, I arranged with the Rev. Thomas Yond, who laboured then as missionary of the episcopalian 416 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison, church in that village, to try if he could induce any of the famed poison-makers to boil it in his presence; and although, on my return to Pirara in 1839, I had at last an opportunity of witnessing the preparation of the poison by my former re- creant Macusi, I nevertheless prefer inserting here Mr. Yond’s letter, as it is an additional evidence for henceforth rejecting “ snake-teeth, stinging ants,” etc. as component parts of the Urari poison. ‘To Robert H. Schomburgk, Esq. “ Pirara, 4th October, 1838. “My Dear Sir, « Knowing as I do that your object in visiting these wilds is that of making general research, for the information and benefit of society at large, I take the present opportunity of presenting you with the promised statement of the manner how, and the ingredients from which, the much-famed Urary poison is made, of which there has been so much conjecture and erroneous accounts given in time past. «« Since the time that I have come to reside amongst the Macusi Indians as missionary, curiosity has led me to go to a little expense in procuring one of the Indians from the Canuku mountains, who is noted for his being able to make powerful poison, whom I prevailed upon to boil a quantity before me at the Mission House. I was fortunate enough in purchasing a quake or basket of Urary bark, as also a quantity of Arimaru, Tarireng, and Tararemu; the rest my Urary-maker procured in the space of three days. The ingredients being already procured, the next movement in course was the erect- ing of my tent, and enclosing three parts of it round with palm- leaves, which for the time being was called the Indians’ Urary House. This temporary house was erected in the front enclosure, opposite the door, that I might see every movement. A buck-pot*, that would hold a little more than a gallon, and that had never been used, was then brought, as also four shallow plates: the first was to boil the ingredients in, and the others to expose the Urary liquid to the sun when boiled, in order to reduce it to a jelly. «One large gooby}, stopped at the mouth or stall-end with loose cotton, was opened at the head-end sufficiently wide for admitting the contents of the Urary-pot through when poured out. A second small gooby was made, in the shape of a funnel, and stopped with silk grass, in order to pour the Urary through when moving it from one drying-plate to the other, that the scum which rises on the top during the time of drying might be kept back. The last receptacle is a small calabash{, that will hold half a pint, into which the whole * The earthen pots in which the Indians prepare their food, and which they manufacture themselves, are called in the colony buck-pots, buck being among the colonists a cognomen for Indian.—S. + Gooby, the fruit of a species of pumpkin, which, after having been scoured out, is used in lieu of a flask.—S. t The bowls prepared of the fruit of the Crescentia cujete, or calabash- tree.—S. and the Plant from wiich it is extracted. 417 of the Urary is poured by degrees through the small funnel, after it has been brought to the consistency of thin starch. As soon as all things were set in order, and the wood split up in readiness for making the fire, the man set off in search of I could not conceive what, and therefore I asked one standing near me why the man had gone away. He said, ‘ He is gone to fetch his tinder-box, to make fire, for he will not take a light from any person’s fire; you will see he will make his own.’ I waited awhile, and then he came with a tinder-box and steel in his hand. I looked at the box and tinder, to see if there was anything remarkable in it, but found it to be simply a roll of loose cotton wound round with thread, about an inch in diameter, and seven in length, having for its case a piece of bamboo of the same length, which aids in protecting the cotton from getting damp, and also serves as an extinguisher to the burning tinder when put downwards in the bamboo-case. Mulatto then took his red flint-stone, such as the Indians commonly use, which is found in some of the distant mountains, and seems. to be just as good as our flint-stone at home for such a purpose*, and struck several times, but the cotton having by some means got rather damp, he could not succeed in getting a light: he then went to my kitchen and lighted his cotton-roller. Now I thought I should find that he would make his fire from this burning tinder, that had certainly got its spark from my kitchen fire; but no, instead of this he pushed it into his bamboo extinguisher, and let it remain there until every spark was put out. He then struck a light from his own flint, and so began making a fire. Other fire than that made by the Urary- maker is not allowed to come under the roof of the Urary-house, lest the whole should be defiled. Neither may any water be used in drawing or cooking the Urary but that which is procured by the Urary-maker, and even that must not be put in any vessel, save his own sacred goblets. “Mulatto began boiling the Urary about eleven on Friday the 19th of September, 1838. The ingredients used are as follows :— rany (barks from a-vane:) te". 22) ede: em aot ibs. Arimarn bark?, vine. + — r (1 ay Tarireng + — Yakkee . rae Wokarimo . Beles Bree lee ton0 | Ot os: Sri ia + — Tararemu $ oz., from the root of the Tarireng vine 4 oz. Muramu§, a bulbous root, not boiled, but soaked in the half-cooked Urary, and the slime is squeezed from it, to congealthe whole . . 14 fb. Manuca||, the bark of a large tree, four small pieces. * The red flint-stone here alluded to is compact quartz (jasper), which is found in the vicinity of Mount Roraima, and along the banks of the rivers Coko and Cukenam.—S. : ¢ Urari, or Strychnos toxifera, Schomb.—S. t Arimaru, Sérychnos cogens, Bentham.—S. § Muramu, a species of Cissus. I brought some of these roots with me, which have been planted with success at Messrs. Loddiges and sons, and at the Botanic Garden in Berlin.—S. || Manuca, or Manica, an intensely bitter bark of a tree which I conceive Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2K 418 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison, “‘ Of these, however, he had to make two separate boilings, on account of his pot being too small to contain the quantity of bark necessary at once, for each of which he took a day,—for the first almost the whole of Friday, and the second the greater part of Sa- turday. The Urary was the first ingredient that was putin the pot, and the rest he every now and then kept adding by little and little, until the whole was used. He kept but a slow fire during the whole time of cooking, just sufficient to keep the liquid in a simmering state, which seemed to suck the virtue out of the bark well. Upon each additional handful of bark that he put in the pot during the time of cooking, he took special care to blow, informing me that that would give virtue to the Urary and make it strong. Of course I did not deem that to be a proper time for giving my opinion as to its real value or not, knowing that a little opposition would soon make him leave his work altogether, and I should be left with the ingredients unboiled, to muse over my own folly; I therefore told him he was welcome to do as he pleased, my only desire beg to see everything that was done, and that the Urary should be strong, or painful as they term it. ‘The whole of these two days (Friday and Saturday) had simply been to draw the poison out from the mixed quantity of bark, so as to form the Urary liquid, which in appearance was not unlike strong-drawn coffee. ‘The whole liquid, consisting of a gallon and a half when first drawn, by this time had been reduced to about a quart, which was then poured into a gooby, the head of which had been cut out, and the tail-end stopped up with loose cotton, sufficiently tight to stop any thick sediment from passing through, acting as a sort of strainer, through which it passed into a large shallow plate and the pot which he had been using, in order to be exposed to the sun. This was on Monday morning. In course of two or three hours after the Urary had been exposed to the sun, I observed the powerful effect which the slime from the bulbous root Muramu* had in perceptibly congealing the liquid to a jelly. On Tuesday Mulatto began to pour the Urary into the more shallow plates, where it remained still exposed to the sun, until brought, as already stated, to the consistency of thin starch, and was from thence removed to the last receptacle, a small calabash, capable of containing near half a pint, to which small quantity the whole was brought. ««This process of drying continued from Monday until Thursday following, when Mulatto gave it over to me. Mulatto then asked me to come and see him try its strength, informing me that the first creature upon which it must be tried was a Tapooya (a species of lizard found amongst the grass in the savannahs) ; for if it quickly t» belong to the Xanthoxylacee. It is said to have the quality of salivating when taken internally, and the inhabitants of the Rio Negro and the Amazon use it therefore in syphilitic complaints. It is remarkable that all the ingredients which the Macusis use for the preparation of their poison are of an intense bitter. This may be the reason that it is used as a tonic. I am however unacquainted with the plants which they call Tarireng, Yakkee, and Wokarimo.—S. * Cissus species?—S., and the Plant from which it is extracied. 419 kills that the Urary must be strong, because of its being hard to kill, having but little blood. I was at a loss to know how he would catch such a swift little creature in so awkward a spot, and how he would find them at all; but the mystery soon was revealed, for, having taken a torch in his hand, he set fire to the dry grass, which spread abroad. and made the poor Tapooyas fly from their retreat, to hide in some distant tuft of grass or brushwood, which Mulatto keenly observed, and slily pounced upon and secured them. He then took a small piece of wood, about the thickness of a stocking-needle, poisoned it at the pointed end with a little of the new-made Urary, and then stuck it in one of the hind legs of the lizard. He then let it loose, when it ran a few yards; then, panting, lay down and died. A second and third he pierced in the tail, upen which it had much the same effect; they both died in a few minutes. A rat was then brought in by one of the Indians, and its thigh was slightly pierced with a needle-like arrow, which had such an effect upon the poor creature as scarcely to allow it to move ten feet before it lay down and expired. I then proposed, as I was about having a fowl killed for dinner, to have it slightly touched with Urary on the leg: to this Mulatto made some objection, saying he never tried his Urary on fowls, and to do so would spoil the whole; but as I pressed it, he said, ‘ Then let it be done.’ Mulatto then made a small arrow on purpose, drying it a little over the fire; for, said he, ‘the Urary is yet soft, and it will strip off from the arrow as soon as it comes in contact with the skin; but if it be dried it will not, and will get to the blood.’ The noble ccck was then shot in the thigh, when it ran for ten or twelve yards, then walked across the road, of twenty yards wide, and lay down in the grass, when its head fell as though its neck had been broken, and he soon after died. “J wished to have tried the effects of the Urary on a deer, or some other wild animal, but have not yet had an opportunity ; how- ever I doubt not, from what I have seen, of its being sufficiently strong to destroy any animal with which we are acquainted in a short time. Having heard in time past that snake-teeth were a ne- cessary ingredient of the Urary, I asked Mulatto whether they were not (happening to have a few by me that had been taken from the head of a large rattle-snake that had been taken a few days before, which were at his service), but he said they were not at all necessary, that he never used them, nor would they assist much in making the Urary strong, since the Urary poison did not depend either upon them or the stinging-ant, and that for himself he used neither. Mulatto did not fail to act according to their superstitions, in abs- taining from meats ; also in requesting me not to eat or drink sugar when I came to see him*, and that no person or woman especially might come near the Urary-house; and even on the Lord’s day would he not altogether cease to boil the Urary, but kept a few sparks alive under the pot, notwithstanding my request that he should do nothing during the sabbath. He would not as usual come into * This superstition no doubt arises from their believing sugar to be an antidote to the Urari poison.—S. o 5 2 420 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison, the chapel, but sat without, considering, as I suppose, that he would become defiled by congregating with the people, and thereby destroy the power of the Urary. “‘T must now conclude, and beg your acceptance of the above observations, as coming from one who wishes you every success in your arduous undertaking, as also your welfare in general, both of soul and body. ‘“« Remaining ever yours, ST OY OND Bancroft, in his ‘ Natural History of Guiana,’ gives us a description of the manner in which the Acawais prepare the “ Woorara,” as he calls it, which, in its general mode, agrees with Mr. Yond’s and my own observations. He distinctly says, “the ingredients are all ‘ nibbees*’ of different kinds.” There is no doubt that different nations prepare their Urari in different modes, but the active principle subsists in one or the other species of Strychnos. I have already alluded to Humboldt’s account of the mode of preparation at Esmeralda, at the time of his journey the place most famed at the Upper Orinoco for making the arrow- poison. Von Humboldt’s narrative is too generally known to demand a recital of his graphic account. However, Esme- ralda is no longer what it was forty years ago; and when I visited it in 1839 I found it merely inhabited by an Indian patriarch and his family, who, on my inquiries, informed me that he bought his poison from the Indian tribes who inhabit the banks of the rivers Paramu and Ventuari, namely, the Guinaus and the Maiongkongs. These tribes, who were known to the Spaniards under the name of Maquiritares, call their poison Cumarawa and Markuri, and distinctly make a difference between it and the Urari, which they gladly prefer in consequence of its superior quality, and which they barter from the Macusis and Arecunas, giving in return the Curata, that admirable reed, sometimes sixteen feet long without an internode, and of which the celebrated blow-pipes or Sarba- cans are made}. From what I learned when amongst these * Lianas, or ligneous twiners, are called nibbees or bushropes by the colonists.—S. t+ Vide Annals of Natural History, vol. v. p. 44, and Linnean Transac- tions, vol. xviii. p. 557.—It is very remarkable that the plant of which the poi- son is made, and the reed which forms such an important part in the con- struction of the blow-pipe, with which the poisoned arrows are propelled, are plants not equally dispersed over these regions, but grow merely on isolated spots. The dArundinaria (drundinaria Schomburgkii, Bennett), which furnishes that remarkable reed, appears to be limited to the chain of sandstone mountains which extends between the second and fourth parallel of north latitude. The only localities which I ascertained were Mounts and the Plant from which it is extracted. 421 tribes, the chief ingredients for the preparation of their poison is either Strychnos Ronhamon or Strychnos cogens (B.), and although it resemble the Urari in appearance, we soon found that it was of inferior strength. The Curare of Esmeralda was prepared by Indians either related to or of the same tribe as the Guinaus and Maiongkongs; and when I showed them a specimen of the Strychnos toxvifera from my herbarium they appeared to be entirely unacquainted with it, while they recognized the specimen of S. cogens as that plant of which they made the Cumarawa. I have already alluded to the similarity in general appearance between Strychnos cogens and Strychnos Ronhamon. It is therefore more than proba- ble that the Curare and Cumarawa are prepared in a similar manner. Von Martius relates the mode of preparation of the Urari as practised by the Juris, Passes, Miranhas and Ticunas, In- dian tribes of the Amazons and Yupura (vide ‘ Reise in Bra- silien, ii. pp. 1155 and 1235) ; and as he had opportunity to be present at the preparation while among the Juri Indians of the river Yupura, I insert here his remarks. “The chief ingredient of the arrow-poison of the Indians of the Yupura is furnished by aslender tree, the Ronhamon Guianensis, Auble (a Strychnos, L.), which in the Tupi tongue is called Urari- iwa. The bark, after having been immersed in water, is pressed out by the Juri-Taboca with his hands, and the yel- lowish juice is concentrated in a flat plate, over a gentle fire, and other infusions extracted in a similar manner from the root of a pepper-shrub (Piper geniculatum) ; from a tree un- known to me, called Taraira-moira, that is, tree of the fish Taraira; the bark of a Cocculus plant (Cocculus Juime, M.), and a twining Ficus, are added in equal quantities. This com- pound extract, of the consistence of a thick syrup, had acquired over the fire a dark brown colour, when it was poured into small vessels, each containing about two ounces, and allowed to cool in the shade of the cabin. Previously, the Indian added to every vessel a small fruit of capsicum (Kiynha-avi), and with this the preparation of the Urari was finished. The Indians revive its strength when it has become weak, chiefly by adding the fruit of capsicum and the root of Piper genicu- latum. There is little doubt that the extract of the four plants which have been named as additions are of less importance, and their place might be supplied by others. According to the information which I received from several Brazilians, other ingredients are added, namely, the milk of Huphorbia Mashiatti, Marawacca, and Wanaya, on the rivers Ventuari, Paramu, and Orinoco, 422 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison, cotinifolia, Hura crepitans, or the astringent fruits of Guat- teria veneficiorum, M.; and superstitious Indians add the first frog which they hear croaking that day, the great black ant, or teeth of poisonous snakes.” The addition of the teeth of poisonous snakes and the great black ants, rests here, again, not upon personal experience, but merely on the information of Brazilians, no doubt equally inoculated as our colonists with the wish to see through the mystic veil. Dr. Poppig, in his ‘ Reise in Chili, Peru, und auf dem Amazonenstrome,’ Leipzig, 1836, vol. ii. p. 456, observes, with respect to the arrow-poison of Peru, “The supposition occasionally met with in Peru, that animal poisons were mixed in the composition, has not met any confirmation.” M. Orfila, in his work on General Toxicology, M. Emmer (‘De Effectu Venenorum veget. Americ.’), and others, have published able treatises on the effect of this poison. The re- sults are, that when inspissated it may be rendered liquid by heat, and is soluble in water, in alcohol, in muriatic acid, and in volatile alkaline spirit. It unites with acids without emo- tion or change of colour. If it be mixed with alkalis, no ebullition is observable, but it changes its colour from a dark brown to a yellowish brown. “A few grains, mixed with as many ounces of human blood, warm from the veins, entirely prevents a separation of serum and crassamentum, and the whole mass continues in a state of fluidity similar to that in which it is drawn, until, after some days, it putrifies.” (Ban- croft.) The poison affects chiefly the nervous system. Its effect of destroying the vital functions is considerably quicker, as I have found by experiments, if it be brought in contact with a vein; and I am of opinion that no sure remedy is known as yet to counteract its effect, if it have entered the blood in sufficient quantity. I have seen the deer arrested in his fleet course, wounded by the poisonous arrow; I have seen the tapir, while swimming across the Rupununi, so slightly wounded that the spike had just penetrated through the thick skin; nevertheless it took effect, and the animal ex- pired. Numerous are the birds of larger and smaller size which I have seen thus secured. As much as I had heard of this fatal poison, I nevertheless cannot abstain from noting the astonishment by which I was seized when I saw it used for the first time. We travelled over the savannahs girt by the Pacaraima mountains; a deer was discovered browsing in the high grass before us. Lieu- tenant Haining, of the 65th regiment, my faithful travelling companion, was too far behind with his gun for us to await his coming up, and one of the Macusi Indians took a poisoned and the Plant from which it is extracted. 423 spike from his sarima* and fixed it to his arrow. Cautiously he stole upon the unsuspecting deer, and shot the arrow into its neck; it made a jump in the air, fled with the speed of the wind over the savannahs, but it had scarcely run forty yards when it fell panting to the ground, and expired. Von Hum- boldt has already related that its effect is more or less sudden upon different animals. If the poison be good and the arrow has entered a sufficient depth, it has effect upon the strongest bull in four to five minutes, while a fowl may resist it double that time. The Indians say that monkeys and jaguars are easier killed with it than any other animal. The poison keeps its efficacy for a length of time. I brought with me at my return to Europe in 1839 a small calabash of the Urari, which had been made in May 1839 in my presence. I made several experiments with it in August 1840, and I found that it killed a rabbit in four to five minutes. Mr. Sewell, veterinary surgeon in London, whom we thank for several experiments to apply the Urari as a remedy in tetanus of horses, received through me some of the same poison, and found it effective. While in Potsdam I gave a small quan- tity to M. Desenis, who wounded several animals with it, and found that it deprived of life a rabbit in eight minutes, a cat in four and a half, and a pigeon in six minutest. On dissecting the animals which had been killed by means of the Urari, it will be generally found that there are no signs of in- flammation either in the lungs, stomach, or any other part, which, with regard to medical jurisprudence, proves this poi- son to be the more dangerous, as, should it be employed for sinister purposes by man against his fellow-creature, it would be difficult to say by a post mortem examination of what the victim died. In some of the rabbits on which I tried expe- riments, Dr. Franz found a large quantity of blood in the brain and the spinal cord. I have already alluded to Mr. Sewell’s experiments, who, viewing the lock-jaw in horses as the result of irritation, con- jectures that “if a horse in tetanus were destroyed by poison, which acts by suppressing nervous power, and life were then to be restored by artificial respiration, the nervous system, on reanimation taking place, might possibly be free of the ori- ginal morbid irritation.” Reasoning thus, Mr. Sewell tried the following singular practice: “A horse suffering from a * Sarima, a small case made of bamboo, and covered with tapir- or deer- skin, and in which the Indian keeps the poisoned arrows until he stands in need of them. It is generaily worn round the neck. s ¢ I presented the small calabash with the remaining poison to the Berlin Museum. 424 Mr.Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison, severe attack of the tetanus and lock-jaw, the mouth being too firmly closed to admit the introduction of either food or medicine, was inoculated on the fleshy part of the shoulder with an arrow-point coated with the Wourali poison; in ten minutes apparent death was produced. Artificial respiration was immediately commenced, and kept up about four hours, when re-animation took place ; the animal rose up, apparently perfectly recovered, and eagerly partook of hay and corn. He unluckily was too abundantly supplied with food during the night. The consequence was over-distention of the sto- mach, of which the animal died the following day, without however having the slightest recurrence of tetanic symptoms.” (‘Outlines of Human Pathology.’) From this experiment, which has been repeated, it was considered that it might be successfully applied in hydrophobia ; and in a distressing case, where Inspector Phelps, of Nottingham, was suffermg under this dreadful disease, Mr. Waterton, of Walton Hall, was re- quested to attend for the purpose of directing the operation. He came too late, as Mr. Phelps had expired before his arrival: but, for the advancement of general information, he, with his usual kind feelings, agreed to exhibit the experiment upon animals. The proceedings which were carried on before the surgical and medical profession at Nottingham have been deta‘ied in the Nottingham Journal of 12th April, 1839, and have been since likewise printed in several periodical journals, where they may be referred to by those who feel interested in it. It was attempted during these experiments to restore by artificial respiration two asses, after they had been wounded with the Urari poison. The one first operated upon, although apparently recovered from the effects, died four days after- wards of debility: with the fate of the second I am not ac- quainted. However this may be, it becomes evident, that the Urari, in the present state of our knowledge of its effects, could only be resorted to in the greatest extremity as a remedy against hydrophobia, and where there is no hope of recovery. _ The poison has been hitherto only to be procured with diffi- culty, as the Indians who manufacture it are not easily induced to part with it; but as I have fully ascertained that the effect- ive principle is the bark of the Strychnos toxifera, and that the additional herbs are of less importance, and no doubt serve merely to mystify its preparation, it will become easy to any one to prepare the Urari, provided the bark be in his reach. It will likewise assist to draw the attention of the fa- culty to the chemical properties of the genus Strychnos. According to M. Chevreul, the Strychnos nux vomica con- sists of acidulous malate of lime, gum, vegeto-animal matter, and the Plant from which it is extracted. 425 bitter matter, fixed oil, colouring matter, (which was yellow and probably starch, and which could not be directly extracted on account of its desiccation,) earthy and alkaline salts, woody hairs and wax, which latter appears to preserve the perisperm from humidity*. MM. Pelletier and Caventou have since discovered two vegetable alkalies, Strychnine and Brucine, in it. It is known that where the Urari has not produced death, it has been followed bytorpor and paralytic fits; and where it has taken effect, the victim dies under convulsions. It appears, when brought in contact with the blood, to have a direct power over the spinal cord. The same effect is produced by the nux vomica when taken internally. M. Orfila observes, ** A person swallowed in the morning a scruple of nux vomica in powder, and drank afterwards a few glasses of cold water in order to diminish the bitterness occasioned by this sub- stance. Half an hour after he appeared to be drunk; his limbs, especially his knees, were stiff and tense: his walk was staggering, and he was afraid of falling. He took some food and the symptoms disappeared. The administration of nux vomica and of the root of gentian to a woman affected with ague was followed by convulsions, cold and stupor, and almost every part of the body was torpid.” (Scutter’s Dissert.t) It is remarkable that the poison proves innocent when taken internally, and is even recommended as a remedy in gastric disorders. While, during my late expedition in the interior of Guiana, I was suffering under all the horrors of a tertian ague, and our quinine had fallen short, I took fre- quently the Urari in doses of about as much as I could get on the point of the knife. After having taken it I felt gene- rally a slight head-ache, but it did not remove the fever; and fearing there might be an excoriation of the tongue or throat, or bleeding of the gums, without being aware of it, my com- panions induced me to desist from the dangerous experiment. The Indian when he purchases the poison tastes it, in order to judge of its genuineness. It is well ascertained, also, that animals shot with the Urari are more savoury when prepared for food, and the meat is quite innocent. Generally, the game which we received from the Indians was killed with the poisoned arrow, and we never hesitated to eat of it. Dissec- tion of those who have died of the nux vomica shows no or- ganic lesions, which is likewise the case where death has been produced by the Urari coming in contact with the blood. The first is proved by numerous experiments of M. Orfila; the * Medical Botany, etc., London, 1831, vol. ii. part lii. t Ib. part lii. 426 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison. latter by those of Mr. Waterton in England, and several phy- sicians in Demerara. The juice of the Cassada becomes in- nocent by being boiled, that of the Urari becomes poisonous after it has been concentrated by the action of fire: should the poisonous principle of the Jatropha manihot be entirely volatile? The Cassaripe is the concentrated juice of the Ja- tropha manihot, and is used as fish-sauce and for many culi- nary purposes, while in its pure state it proves poisonous to animal life; what then can cause the difference? I am not aware whether experiments have been made by inoculating animals with the juice of the nux vomica in its pure state, and likewise after having been concentrated. Sir Walter Raleigh says, in his second Guiana voyage, “There was nothing whereof I was more curious than to find out the true remedies of these poisoned arrows..... And it is more strange to know that in all this time there was never Spaniard, either by gift or torment, that could attain to a true knowledge of the cure, although they have martyred and put to invented torture I know not how many of them.” Raleigh recommends garlic as an antidote where the wound has been inflicted with an arrow of the ordinary poison, and advises them to abstain from drink, “ for if they take any liquor into their body, as they shall be marvellously provoked thereunto by drought, I say, if they drink before the wound be dressed, or soon upon it, there is no way with them but present death.” Irai, a Carib chieftain of the Rupununi, and the last descend- ant in direct line of the Cacique Mahanarawa, so far confirms Raleigh’s account, that the thirst which ensues after a wound has been inflicted is intolerable. He pretended that the in- fusion from the root of a species of Wallaba (Dimorpha, W.), mixed with sugar, or the juice of sugar-cane, was an antidote. There is not much dependence to be placed on this remedy. While in Curasawake in 1838, we secured several Kings of the Vultures (Sarcorhamphus Papa) alive. A female which we had for several weeks succeeded in escaping out of the place where she was kept, and flew to a neighbouring tree. 1 was loath to lose her, and resolved to shoot her with weakened Urari poison. It took effect, and she fell from the tree. We immediately applied juice of the sugar-cane, but without avail ; and after having lingered for half an hour, she died un- der convulsions. Humboldt observes, that an application of salt internally and to the wound would be found of importance; and Mr. Waterton informs us, that an ass which was poisoned by Wourali recovered by inflating his lungs with a pair of bel- lows*. In the ‘Annals of Philosophy,’ vol. xv. p. 389, we * Waterton’s ‘ Wanderings,’ p. 83. Mr. Brown on the Clacton Fluvio-Marine Deposit. 427 are informed that M. Drapiez has ascertained by numerous experiments that the fruit of the Feuillea cordifolia is a powerful antidote against vegetable poison. The genus Feu- illea is common to South America, and the subject is of such interest that it deserves a trial. EXPLANATION OF THE FIGURES. Pirate XII. Branch of the Urari plant, Strychnos toxifera, Schomb., less than natural size. Prate XIII. Fig. 1. Fruit of the Urari plant, natural size. Fig. 2. Do. cut transversely, natural size. Fig. 3. Seed of do., natural size. XLIL—A List of the Fossil Shells found in a Fluvio-Marine Deposit at Clacton in Essex. By Mr. J. BRown*. GENTLEMEN, Tue fossils named in the accompanying list were obtained by searching the beds which compose the fluvio-marine de- posit at Clacton, on the eastern coast of Essex, a section of which is given in the ‘ Mag. Nat. Hist.,’ vol. iv. p. 199, N.S., with a description of the geological features of that forma- tion. In a note appended to that article, which accompanies the above-mentioned section, a promise is held out to the readers of the Magazine, that a list of the fossils, which have excited a peculiar and lively interest in the Clacton deposit, would at some future opportunity be furnished. It is intended by the present communication to supply that deficiency ; and as the greater number of the fossil shells, both of marine and freshwater species, collected from those beds, have been very recently submitted to the notice of Mr. J. D. C. Sowerby, the list is offered with the greater confi- dence. Fossils of the Bed No. 4. in Section fig. 9. Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. iv. p- 194, N.S. Marine. . Balanus ovularis ? Lam. . Tellina solidula. tenuis. Mactra ovalis, Sow. A crag fossil. . Mytilus edulis. Mostly very young. . Cardium edule. Do OD = * Vide Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. iy. p. 197, N.S. 428 Mr. Brown on the Clacton Fluvio-Marine Deposit. 7. Littorina Ulve. 8. Flustra. Encrusting shells and pebbles. Freshwater Shells, etc. of No. 4. 9. Pisidium amnicum, Gray. 10. Paludina impura ; Bithinia tentaculata, Gray. thermalis ? 12. Valvata piscinalis, Gray. cristata, Gray. 14. Cypris Faba. 15. Chara hispida? Fossils of No. 6. Section fig. 9. descending series. Marine and Freshwater, the same as in No. 4. Freshwater Fossils found in Bed No. 7. Sec. 9. 1. Limneus auricularius, Gray. 2. Paludina impura ; Bithinia tentaculata, Gray. oe — minuta. 4. Valvata piscinalis, Gray. De — cristata, Gray. 6. Planorbis imbricatus. Us levis. 8. helicoides. A new species. Sowerby. @,; 2. marginatus. 10. ——- contortus. 11. Ancylus fluviatilis. 12. Pisidium amnicum, Gray. Henslowianum. — pusillum, Gray. 15. Cypris Faba. 16. Cypris. A larger species. 17. Vertebree of small fish. Land Fossil Shells, etc. from Bed No. 7. Sec. 9. 18. Helix paludosa ; H. pulchella, Gray. 19. rufescens. 20. radiata ; Zonites rotundatus, Gray. Dil alliaria. 22 umbilicata ; Zonites umbilicatus, Gray. 23 conoidea. A new species. Pl. Il. f. 4, 5. 24. Pupa edentula. 25. Clausilia. 26. Bulimus lubricus. 27. Carychium minimum. 28. Molar tooth of a Rodent, probably a Water Rat. 29. Seeds of Chara. 30. Triloculina inflata (Deshayes), figured in Lyell’s ‘ Prin. of Geol.’ vol. iii. This minute fossil occurs both at Clacton and Walton : it is the only marine shell in this bed. Stanway, April 15th, 1841. JOHN BROWN. Bibliographical Notices. 429 The following are descriptions of the two new shells found in this deposit :— Planorbis helicoides. Lenticular, shining, above slightly convex and minutely umbilicated ; edge obtuse ; whorls two and a half, concealed, the outer one large; beneath convex, a little de- pressed in the centre, where the whorls are visible. Diameter about one-tenth of an inch. It resembles somewhat Zonites (Helix) radiatulus, but is flatter, having more the form of Segmentina (Planorbis) lineata, but wanting the septa. Helix conoidea. Short, conical, finely striated ; whorls about six, convex; base largely umbilicated, convex ; aperture oblong- ovate, its upper half deeply impressed by the preceding whorl ; its peristome confined to the lower half, prominent and straight. This differs from H. rufescens in being regularly conical, and having a more elevated pointed spire. See Plate II. figs. 4, 5, in this volume. BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES. On the Relation between the Holy Scriptures_and some Parts of Geo- logical Science. By J. Pye Smith, D.D. 12mo. London, 1840. 2nd ed. The Certainties of Geology. By W. Sidney Gibson, F.G.S. 8vo. London, 1840. No two subjects would appear at first sight to be more discon- nected than those of Geology and Revealed Religion. The one is engaged solely in examining the structure of the earth, and in thence deducing conclusions as to the physical causes which have brought it into its present condition ; the other treats of the moral history of man, his relations to his Creator and to his fellow-creatures, and the whole sphere of his duties and his destinies. So wholly distinct in- deed are these two studies, that they cannot be said in the slightest degree to aid each other. A geologist may reason with precisely the same accuracy on the facts of his own science, even should he un- fortunately be a disbeliever in Revelation; and it is equally certain that a knowledge of the discoveries of modern Geology is not (except as connected with Natural Theology) in the remotest degree condu- cive to the all-important studies and devotions of the Christian. There seems, therefore, no reason why the two inquiries should not be successfully prosecuted without encroaching on each other’s do- main. The fact however is otherwise: Geology and Revelation have been very unnecessarily brought into collision by persons who seem to have but an imperfect notion of the true limits and ends of each. Volumes have been written accusing geologists as a body with being inimical to religion, and denouncing the science itself as a delusive and pernicious study. The geologist is hence compelled in self-de- fence, however unwilling he may be to desert the legitimate fields of his inquiries, to arm himself against these well-meaning, though 430 Bibliographical Notices. too often intolerant opponents, with the weapon of rational and tem- perate argument. It is on these grounds that geologists may feel grateful to the au- thors of the two treatises which are under our notice. We trust they will have the effect of rescuing geology from the calumnies which have been cast upon it, and of allaying in the mind of the sincere be- liever any misgivings on the subject which may have arisen from the intemperate language used by some of the opponents of the science. Dr. Pye Smith’s little volume is written in a strain at once pious and philosophical. He has bestowed much diligence in consulting au- thorities, and in applying the resources of criticism to the elucidation of Scripture ; and to these requisites he has superadded an element which is often wanting in the writings of those who have attempted this subject,—a complete practical knowledge of the details of geo- logical science. Devoted to the truths of Revelation no less than to those of Science, and regarding them both as proceeding from the: same Divine Source, he will allow of no compromise, distortion, or subterfuge, with respect to either. The points at issue in this controversy may be thus stated. After a most extensive induction of facts collected in all parts of the globe by a numerous body of laborious and diligent observers, the more philosophical geologists have deduced from them a mass of new and most extraordinary results, all tending to prove the power and pro- vidential care of the Deity from the Creation to the present day, and thus widely extending the field of Natural Theology. Among the generalizations thus arrived at, there are two or three points on which nearly all geologists are agreed, but which are inconsistent with the generally received interpretation of certain passages in the book of Genesis. Now it is important to observe two things: first, that these apparent discrepancies relate to points wholly unconnected with the essential objects of Scripture, namely, the moral history and duties of Man ; and secondly, that they refer to events long an- terior to the commencement of written history. Subsequent to that period there is not one single circumstance recorded in Holy Writ which can in any way be brought into connexion either favourably or other- wise with the discoveries of modern geology. If then the passages in question relate to points foreign to the objects of the author of Genesis, and were compiled from local traditions or very ancient writings, even though secured by direct inspiration from the possi- bility of actual error, yet it is plain that there is a greater liability to obscurity of language and consequent erroneous interpretation in this portion of Scripture than in those later narrations which were recorded by eye-witnesses and contemporaries. And it is further evi- dent that a very large allowance must be made for the necessity of adapting the language of Genesis to the people to whom it was ad- dressed. Moses wrote indeed prospectively for all mankind, but im- mediately for the Jews, a nation just released from slavery, and in a state of mental advancement little superior to that of children. The utmost condescension of language was therefore necessary before the sublime truths of religion could be brought home to the comprehen- Bibliographical Notices. 4351 sions of such a people—a point which is admirably elucidated by Dr. Pye Smith in his seventh Lecture. The only points in which the discoveries of modern geology are at variance, not with the truths of Revelation, for that they never can be, but with the prevailing interpretations of the Pentateuch, are the three following: viz. the antiquity of the world; the exist- ence of death before the fall of Adam; and the partial extent of the deluge. The facts unfolded by modern science unquestionably de- monstrate that the earth is of far greater antiquity than the 6000 years usually assigned to it, and they prove with equal certainty that animal life was subject to death during periods long prior to the creation of Man; there are reasons also, though not of the same demonstrative nature as those above mentioned, yet hardly less convincing to a geologist, for supposing that the Noachic de- luge, instead of covering the whole globe as is commonly believed, was confined to that portion of it which was then inhabited by man. Those friends to Revelation, therefore, who are not content to rest satisfied in the opinion of Dr. Paley, that Christianity ought not to be made answerable for the statements and opinions of every writer in the Old Testament*, will be anxious to seek for such an interpre- tation of the sacred text as will accord with the facts on which these conclusions of science are built. Dr. Pye Smith, after reciting at considerable length and in a most candid spirit the various speculations of other authors on this sub- ject, concludes with explaining his own views of the question. * “ To make Christianity answerable for the circumstantial truth of each separate passage of the Old Testament, the genuineness of every book, the information, fidelity, and judgment of every writer in it, is to bring, I will not say great, but unnecessary difficulties, into the whole system.”—Paley’s Evidences of Christianity, part ili. ch. 3. “‘ Our Scriptures afford a valuable testimony to those of the Jews. But the nature of this testimony ought to be understood. It is surely very dif- ferent from, what it is sometimes represented to be, a specific ratification of each particular fact and opinion.” —Jd. Dr. Paley’s view is in accordance with that of other distinguished theo- logians, as will appear from the following extracts :— “ To rectify men’s sentiments in natural, historical, or chronological mat- ters; to mend their logick or rhetorick where it was defective, but had no ill influence on piety, was not at all the business of Revelation.” — Bishop Chandler’s Defence of Christianity, p. 272. “The Natural Philosophy of the Pentateuch ought not to induce us to reject it. It is not at all likely that God, in order to enable a man to be a lawgiver of the Jews, should reveal to him all the causes of the phenomena of nature.” —Lectures in Divinity, by Dr. Hey, Norrisian Professor, Cam- bridge, vol. i. p. 196. “« Many serious and thinking Christians have judged that the first part of Genesis is not a literal description of fact, but allegorical.” —J., vol. iii. p. 152. “« Whether the beginning of Genesis is to be understood in a literal or an allegorical sense? Whether the book of Job be a history, or a parable? being points disputed between Christians, an infidel can have no right to argue from one side of the question in those and the like cases.” —Bishop Berkeley's Minute Philosopher, Dialogue vi. § 29. 432 Bibliographical Notices. He meets the difficulty respecting the antiquity of the earth by supposing that all the geological formations discovered by modern science were deposited after the original creation of matter asserted in the first verse of Genesis, but before the particular series of events narrated in the rest of the chapter. These vast geological periods, being unconnected with human history, are wholly omitted by Moses. The narrative which follows he supposes to refer, not to the whole earth, but to a particular region, probably in Central Asia, which he considers to have been reduced by volcanic or other agencies to the state of darkness and desolation described in the second verse. ‘The rest of the chapter relates, in the most simple and condescending language, the gradual restoration of this region to a state of fertility, and the consummation of the six days’ work by the creation of Man. This hypothesis is perfectly consistent with geological facts, and may surely be considered as being calculated to give satisfaction to the mind of the Christian philosopher. The question as to the existence of death before the fall of Adam is easily disposed of. When we are told that “‘ by man sin entered into the world, and death by sin,” it is evident from the whole context that it is only the death of man, not that of the inferior animals, which is spoken of. The testimony of geology as to the existence of animal death from the earliest times is corroborated by the voice of comparative anatomy no less than of common sense. Dr. Pye Smith proceeds to show, that the objections which have been raised on geological grounds to the supposed universality of the deluge may be set at rest by assuming the Noachic flood, like the Adamic creation, to have been confined to a limited district. He quotes many texts in which the phrase ‘all the earth”’ is used figu- ratively for a particular region, and hence it is easy to suppose, that in the case of the deluge the same expression may have a similarly re- stricted meaning. And it is aremarkable fact that there is a vast re- gion on the shores of the Caspian which is at least 100 feet below the level of the sea, an irruption of which would at this day inun- date many thousand square miles and destroy millions of lives. Dr. Pye Smith conjectures, that by volcanic disturbances the Indian Ocean gained access to this depressed region, where, aided by vast torrents of rain, a deluge was produced sufficient to destroy the human race of that period. The ark, containing a few favoured sur- vivors, might thus easily be drifted, not indeed to the frozen sum- mit * of the Armenian Ararat according to the common tradition, but to some of the lower ranges of hills connected with that mountain. This hypothesis of our author has certainly great plausibility, and we will only suggest as an amendment, that the tract in question was more likely to have been inundated from the Euxine than from the Indian Ocean. The Euxine and Caspian Seas are separated by a very low tract of land in South Russia, and if the Bosphorus were now to be blocked up by a volcanic eruption, the waters of the Euxine would rise to the height of 576 feet, and those of the Cas- * Mr. Beke, however, contends that it must have been upon the highest point: see his ‘ Origines Biblice,’ 1834, Bibliographical Notices. 433 pian to 677 feet above their present level, before they would find a vent over the lowest point of the Balcan range. An elevation of water to this extent would inundate the whole lower basin of the Danube, the South of Russia, Georgia, Bokhara, and a vast extent of Tartary, and a removal of the barrier would cause the waters speedily to subside. ‘That such an event ever actually occurred it would be rash to assert; but it is certainly a remarkable fact, that both shores of the Bosphorus, where it joins the Euxine, are occu- pied by masses of volcanic rocks, and traditions of the damming-up of the Black Sea and the bursting of the barrier were current among the ancients, and are recorded by Diodorus Siculus and Strabo*. We are conscious that justice is not done to Dr. Pye Smith’s ar- guments by this brief abstract of their results, and we therefore the more strongly recommend his work to the profound attention of the philosophic theologian no less than of the Christian geologist. It is a work calculated to be eminently conducive to the best interests both of religion and of science at the present moment. Mr. Sidney Gibson’s work goes over the same ground as that of Dr. Smith, and arrives at nearly the same conclusions. Although not illustrated to the same extent with the treasures of learning, it is marked throughout by candour and sincerity no less than by sound- ness of reasoning. Like Dr. Pye Smith, he explains the antiquity of the earth by supposing a vast lapse of time between the universal and the Adamic creation, but to this assumption he superadds that of the six ‘‘ days of creation” having been six indefinite periods. Many writers have had recourse to the same hypothesis; but if it should be thought right not to depart further from the strict letter of Scripture than the facts of the case require, it may be observed that these are already satisfied by the explanation given by Dr. Smith, as above announced. Our space prevents us from noticing Mr. Gibson’s work in greater detail, but we cordially recommend it as an excellent coadjutor to that of Dr. Smith in the laudable office of rendering science and reli- gion mutually confirmatory of each other. And should there be any who may still entertain doubts with regard to the hypotheses pro- posed in them, we would again direct their attention to the opinion of so able a reasoner and so eminent an expositor of the evidences of Christianity as Dr. Paley. Linnea, ein Journal fiir die Botanik, etc. 1840. {Continued from vol. vi. p. 148.] Parr I. Scholium to Hampe’s Prod. Flore Hercyn.—Schlechtendal on Schiede’s and Ehrenberg’s Mexican plants. Part II. On Tetradiclis, Stev.; by Dr. A. Bunge.—On Conferva Lehman- niana; by Dr. Lindenberg.—On the structure of the stem of [soetes * Respecting the Greek traditions of the Deluge, see Mr. Kenrick’s dis- sertations in the ‘ Philological Museum,’ vol. ii., and in the ‘ Philosophical Magazine,’ N.S. vol. v. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2¥ 434 Entomological Society. lacustris ; by Prof. Mohl.—On the Dry Rot; by Schwabe.—Synop- sis of Desmidia; by J. Meneghini. Part III. On the proper systematic place of certain families of Plants.—On some Diatomacee ; by Lobarzewski.—On a true circulation in Closte- rium Lunula; by Lobarzewski.—Plants on sale from Bahia; by Luschnath.—Botanical Observations ; by Schlechtendal. Part IV. Decades of new Composite ; by Walpers.—Supplement to Prod. Fl. Herc. ; by Hampe.—On the Carices of Thunberg’s Flora Capensis ; by Schlechtendal—On a monstrosity in the leaves of Trifolium re- pens; by Walpers.—Four new Mammillarie; by Ehrenberg.— Mexican Plants of Schiede and others; by Schlechtendal. Part V. Synopsis Thymelearum, Polygonearum, et Begoniarum Africz australis; by Meisner.—Decade of new Composite ; by Walpers.— Mexican Plants of Schiede and others ; by Schlechtendal.—Obser- vations on passages in Endlicher and Martius’s Fl. Braziliensis ;_ by Schweegrichen. Part VI. Scholium to Hampe’s Prod. Fl. Hercyn. Icones Fungorum hucusque cognitorum. 'Tomus 4. A.C. I. Corda. Pragze, 1840. Our object in noticing the present number, which in point of exe- cution exceeds even the two preceding, is to call attention to the ad- mirable figure of Puccinia graminis, or mildew. It is far more com- plete than that so often referred to of Bauer. Among the points elucidated in the present number, is the very interesting one that Asterophora is a mere parasite of the second order, its matrix having perfect sporidia. The author does not seem to have access to many well-known journals, or he would not have published as Sporocybe Desmazierii a plant altogether unlike that figured under that name in the ‘ Annales des Sciences Naturelles ;’ neither would Spheria Robertsti, Hook., of which an admirable analysis is given, appear as an undescribed species, Sp. Hiigelii. PROCEEDINGS OF LEARNED SOCIETIES. ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY. January 4th, 1841.—The Rev. F. W. Hope, F.R.S., President, in the Chair. The President stated, in reference to Mr. Schomburgk’s memoir, read at a previous meeting, that migrations of butterflies to a very great extent had been repeatedly observed in South America, in- stances of which had been recorded in Helme’s account of Buenos Ayres. Mr. Westwood corrected an error which had occurred in the printing of a memoir relative to the Pediculus Melitte of Kirby, or Entomological Society. 435 the larva of Meloe, in the Transactions of the Society, in which it had been stated that the specimens which he had found at large and dissected were identical with some reared by the Rev. L. Jenyns from the darve of the Meloe, whereas the latter had been reared from the eggs of that insect. This correction was especially required, because in the volume upon insects in the Cabinet Cyclopedia it had been suggested by Mr. Shuckard that the two insects were not iden- tical. A memoir was read by Mr. Westwood on the nomenclature of the genus Chlorion of Latreille (Ampulex, Jurine). From a review of Latreille’s various works it appears, that although at the first he gave the Sphex lobata, Fabr. as the type of the genus, yet its characters were not derived from that insect, but agree with the Spher com- pressa, Fabr. Fabricius, however, adopted and characterized the genus Chlorion from the former of these two species, but included in it also Sphex compressa. Jurine, however, finding the latter species not to agree generically with the former, proposed the name of dm- pulex for the Spher compressa, and figured an European species as an example, which however does not precisely agree with S. compressa. Under these circumstances the author considers that the name of Chlorion ought to be applied to the genus typified by Spher com- pressa, that the Chlorion of Fabricius requires another name, and that the name Ampulexr is strictly synonymous with Chlorion, the same species being the true type of both generic names. In allusion to the employment of synonymical names of genera, Mr. Yarrell stated that a calculation had been made by Messrs. Agassiz and De- Candolle, by which it appeared that no less than 300 generic names of plants and 800 names of zoological genera required changing, having been previously used in other branches, and it was insisted upon by several members that the inconvenience which would neces- sarily result from the change in such a number of names would far overbalance the occasional slight inconveniences at present felt in cases of such ‘‘ double emploies,” as the French term them. It was further suggested by Mr. Waterhouse, that as Latreille had erred in the first instance in giving as the type of Chlorion an insect which did not accord with the generic characters which he had detailed, we ought to adopt the nomenclature of Fabricius, who had given the real characters of the insect which Latreille had mentioned as its typical species. Anniversary meeting, January 25th, 1841.—The Rev. F. W. Hope in the Chair. At this Meeting the ordinary business of the annual meeting took place. W. Sells, G. R. Waterhouse, S. Stevens, and W. Bennett, Esqrs., were elected into the Council in the room of E. Charlesworth, W. E. Shuckard, J. F. Stephens, and F. Walker, Esqrs., and W. W. Saunders, Esq., F,E.S., was elected President, W. Yarrell, Esq., Treasurer, and J. O. Westwood, Secretary for the ensuing year. In the address delivered by the Rev. F. W. Hope, after favourably commenting upon the character of the Society’s Transactions, he BAN? . 436 Linnean Society. suggested the propriety of members taking up the old theses of Lin- neus and bringing down the subjects therein treated upon to the present state of the science. The injurious effects of insects upon agricultural and horticultural productions ought also to engage the attention of the members. He would also recommend the formation of committees, taking up and annually reporting upon the entomo- logy of the various geographical districts: and he alluded to the great loss the Society and science had sustained by the deaths of Dr. Goodall, Mr. Vigors, and Major Gyllenhal. It was announced that the caterpillar of one of the Noctuide which devours the roots of turnips should be again proposed as the subject of the essay for the prize of ten guineas, offered by the Society in conjunction with the Saffron Walden Agricultural Society. The Rev. F. W. Hope also announced his intention of giving a prize of £10 for the best essay on the insects which attack apple and pear trees, with the best remedy for their destruction. LINNZAN SOCIETY. March 2, 1841.—Mr. Forster, V.P., in the Chair. Read a ‘‘ Note on the Preservation of Specimens of Natural History.” By Hyde Clarke, Esq., F.L.S. Mr. Clarke suggests the application of Payne’s apparatus for the preservation of animal substances for domestic purposes, to the pre- servation of objects of Natural History. The apparatus consists of an iron cylinder, in which the subject for preparation is placed, and the air-tight cover screwed down. ‘The air is then exhausted by means of an air-pump, and when a sufficient exhaustion has been effected, a cock is opened communicating with a vessel containing the antiseptic fluid, which, on being admitted, thoroughly pene- trates the object to be preserved, impregnating even the marrow of the bones. He adds, that the process is useful not only for the prevention of putrefaction, but also in arresting its progress, the gases generated during putrefaction being expelled from the re- ceiver along with the air, and their place supplied by the antiseptic. March 16.—Mr. Brown, V.P., in the Chair. Read ‘‘ On an edible Fungus from Tierra del Fuego, and an allied Chilian species.” By the Rev. M. J. Berkeley, M.A., F.L.S. Mr. Berkeley describes these two species as constituting a new genus, which he characterizes as follows :— CYTTARIA. Receptacula carnoso-gelatinosa in stroma commune subglobosum, epider- mide crassiuscula vestitum, aggregata ; basi stipitiformi granulata. Cupula peripherica, primo clausa, gelatina distenta, demim epidermide rupta aperta. Hymenium, margine exeepto, separabile. sci ampli, demum liberi, paraphysibus immixtis. Veluwm persistens, demum ruptum, margine plis minus reflexo. Sporidia pallida. Genus Bulgari affine, sed stromate pulvinato ex variis individuis com- posito Spheriam concentricam quodammodo referens, et hymenio sepa- rabili valde diversum. Certé ad seriem Pexizarum pertinet, perithecio spurio non obstante. Confer Spi@riam monocarpam, Schum. ad Pexi- Linnean Society. 437 zam rhizopodam a clar. Friesio ascriptam. Nomen dedi a xUTT 2005, ob superficiem fungi alveolatam. 1. C. Darwinii, vitellina globoso-depressa, cupulis parvis ore irregulari de- mum apertis. Hab. in Fagum betuloidem in Tierra del Fuego, Dec.-Jun. 2. C. Berteroi, pallidior irregularis, basi subelongata, cupulis majoribus ; ore pentagono; margine fisso reflexo. Hab. in Chili in Fagum obliquam, vere et zstate. The first species is noticed by Mr. Darwin (from whom Mr. Berkeley obtained his specimens of both) at p. 298 of his ‘ Journal and Remarks,’ forming the third vol. of the ‘ Narrative ef the Voyages of the Adventure and Beagle’ ; and Mr. Berkeley gives from Mr. Darwin’s MS. notes a more detailed account of his observations made upon the spot. The second species is referred to in a post- humous list of the plants collected by Bertero (originally published in the ‘Mercurio Chileno,’ and translated in Silliman’s ‘ North American Journal,’ vol. xxiii. p. 78), as forming, perhaps, ‘‘ a new genus approximating to the Spherie.”’ A further account of this species also is extracted from Mr. Darwin’s notes: it seems to be less eatable, and less frequently eaten than the first, which Mr. Darwin describes as forming a very essential article of food for the Fuegian. Read also a “ Letter from Joseph Woods, Esq., F.L.S., to Mr. Kippist, on Crepis biennis and Barkhausia taraxacifolia.” Mr. Woods is of opinion that the plant described by Sir James Smith in the ‘ English Flora’ and ‘ English Botany,’ by Sir W. J. Hooker in the ‘ British Flora,’ by Mr. Babington in the Society’s « Transactions,’ vol. xvii. p. 456, and by Mr. Mackay in his ‘ Irish Flora,’ as Crepis biennis, is in reality Barkhausia taraxacifolia, di- stinguished especially by the long beak of its achenia, while those of Crepis biennis are, in the words of Gaudin, “‘ neutiquam attenuata.” The stem of Crepis biennis is also less branched and more leafy than that of Barkhausia tarazacifolia, the latter rarely producing a leaf except where there is a branch. Mr. Woods adds, that it is almost certain that we have the two species in England, though the dif- ference has not been noticed. Crepis biennis grows in Kent and Surrey. In a “Note” appended to Mr. Woods’s letter, Mr. Kippist states that the authentic Linnean specimens of Crepis biennis from Scania, although too young to have ripe seeds, appear to confirm Mr. Woods’s idea, the pappus being quite sessile even in those most advanced, and the stem moderately branched in the upper part, and very leafy below. The two specimens in the Smithian Herbarium, one from Mr. Crowe’s garden and the other from Mr. Rose’s Herbarium, have the stem much branched, and the pappus apparently sessile, but the achenia are immature. The only developed specimen in Mr. Winch’s herbarium is from Dartford in Kent, and has the pappus very decidedly stalked, the stem much branched is the upper part, and only a few scattered leaves in the lower, a branch being produced from the axilla of each cauline leaf with the exception of one or two of the lowermost. 438 Linnean Society. Other specimens, gathered near Cobham and Ramsgate, in the same county, and near Moulsey in Surrey, agree with Mr. Winch’s plant in their stalked pappus and branched stem, and probably therefore belong to Barkhausia taraxacifolia. The only British specimens in the Society’s possession that Mr. Kippist believes to be referrible with certainty to Crepis biennis are two in the Hortus Siccus of Mr. Woodward, with ripe achenia and perfectly sessile pappus ; the habitats of the plants are not given, but in all probability they were gathered either in Suffolk or Norfolk. Read also an ‘“‘ Extract from a Letter to John Miers, Esq., F.L.S., from George Gardner, Esq.,” dated Rio de Janeiro, Dec. 16, 1840, in which Mr. Gardner gives some account of his journeys in the in- terior of Brazil, and of the collections made by him subsequent to May last. April 6.—Mr. Forster, V.P., in the Chair. Read, an Extract of a Letter from J. Burnham, Esq., to Hyde Clarke, Esq., F.L.S., on a supposed new British Juncus. Read also the commencement of ‘‘ An Appendix or Supplement to a Treatise on the @stri and Cuterebre of various Animals.” By Bracy Clark, Esq., F.L.S., Corresp. Memb. of the French Institute. April 20.—Mr. Brown, V.P., in the Chair. His Grace the Duke of Northumberland, F.L.S., sent for exhibi- tion a specimen of the fruit of Chrysophyllum monopyrenum, Sw., from his living collection at Syon House. W. Felkin, Esq., F.L.S., sent for exhibition specimens of Sea- Island Cotton grown in a cotton-mill situate in the centre of Man- chester, accompanied by a Notice of the circumstances under which the experiment was made. The details have been given in the Transactions of the British Association. Read the conclusion of Mr. Bracy Clark’s “Appendix or Supple- ment to a Treatise on the @stri and Cuterebre of various Animals.” The first memoir to which this paper is intended as an Appendix appeared in the third volume of the Linnean Transactions, published in 1796. This memoir was republished by the author with consi- derable additions in 1815, and a Supplement was added in the fol- lowing year. Since that period much has been published on the sub- ject, and Mr. Clark is desirous in consequence of making some ad- ditions and corrections to his former publications. After adding to and modifying some of the passages contained in them, he examines the validity of several species of the genus Uistrus proposed by writers. He suspects G2. Trompe of Modeer and Gi. ericetorum of Leach to be severally the males of Gi. Tarandi and C4. Bovis. He believes G?. Pecorum of Fabricius to be only a dark- coloured variety of Gi. nasalis, L. (G2. veterinus, B. Cl.) ; and is sa- tisfied by an examination of the original specimen, that Dr. Leach’s G Clarkii is nothing more than a very light-coloured variety of the same species. He also regards @. lineatus of Villars as synonymous with G2. Bovis. Referring to Latreille’s account of the genus in Cuvier’s ‘ Régne Linnean Society. 439 Animal,’ he points out some omissions with regard to the habits and ceconomy of G2. Equi and @. hemorrhoidalis, and objects to the statement that the eggs of the latter are deposited on the verge of the anus of the animal attacked. He strongly deprecates the opi- nion of Pallas and Latreille, that there exists a proper human Gstrus, which he regards as altogether founded in error; and believes the larva figured in illustration of a supposed case of the kind published by Mr. Howship, to be that of G?. Bovis. Lastly, he describes three species, added to the genus @strus since the publication of his Treatise, viz. Gi. pictus of Megerle, Gi. Liby- cus of Riippel, and G2. Clarkii of Shuckard. ‘The following are the characters of the latter species, figures of which, and of Gt. Libycus, accompany the paper :— (. Clarkii, czerulescenti-fuscus, alis obscuris anticé sinuatis basin versus atro-bipunctatis. Hab. ad Caput Bonz Spei. He adds also a description of a new species of his genus Cuterebra, with the following characters :-— C. fontanella, thorace atro lateribus albis, abdomine violacco: segmentis ultimis albis nigro-punctatis. Hab, in Illinois Americz Borealis, cuniculis przcipué infesta. May 4.—Mr. Brown, V.P., in the Chair. Read the commencement of ‘‘ Remarks on some new or rare Spe- cies of Brazilian Plants.” By Charles James Fox Bunbury, Esq., F.L.S. May 24.—The Bishop of Norwich, President, in the Chair. This day, the Anniversary of the birth-day of Linnzus, and that appointed by the Charter for the Election of Council and Officers, the President opened the business of the Meeting, and stated the num- ber of Members whom the Society had lost during the past year. The following is a list of the Members who have died within that period, acccompanied with notices of some among them. Francis Bauer, Esq., F.R.S., &c., was born at Feldsberg, in Austria, on the 4th of October, 1758. His father, who held an ap- pointment as painter to Prince Lichtenstein, died while he was yet a boy, and the care of his education devolved upon his mother. So early was his talent for botanical drawing manifested, that the first published production of his pencil, a figure of Anemone pratensis, L., is appended to a dissertation by Stérck ‘de Usu Pulsatille nigri- cantis,’ which bears date in 1771. In 1788 he came to England in company with the younger Jac- quin, and after visiting his brother Ferdinand, who was then engaged in completing the beautiful series of drawings since published in the ‘ Flora Greca,’ was about to proceed to Paris. But the liberal pro- posals made to him by Sir Joseph Banks on the eve of his intended departure, diverted him from this resolution, and induced him to remain in England and to take up his residence in the neighbourhood of the Royal Garden at Kew, in which village he continued to dwell until the termination of his life. It was the opinion of Sir Joseph Banks, that a botanic garden was incomplete without a draughtsman 440 Linnean Sociely. permanently attached to it, and he accordingly, with the sanction ot His Majesty, fixed Mr. Bauer in that capacity at Kew, himself de- fraying the salary during his own life, and providing by his will for its continuance to the termination of that of Mr. Bauer. In fulfil- ment of this engagement with Sir Joseph, Mr. Bauer made numerous drawings and sketches of the plants of the garden, which are now preserved in the British Museum. A selection from his drawings was published in 1796 under the title of ‘ Delineations of Exotick Plants cultivated in the Royal Garden at Kew,’ and this was in- tended to be continued annually ; but no more than three parts, con- sisting wholly of Heaths, and containing thirty plates, were published. In the early part of 1801, Mr. Bauer made for Mr. Brown, who had then been for some years engaged in a particular study of the Ferns, drawings of many genera of that family which Mr. Brown regarded as new. His drawings of Woodsia, made some years after- wards, were published in the 11th volume of our ‘Transactions, in illustration of Mr. Brown’s paper on that genus. At a later period he again directed his attention to that tribe of plants, his labours in which have within these few years been given to the world in Sir William Jackson Hooker’s ‘ Genera of Ferns.’ The 13th volume of our ‘I’ransactions is enriched with his elaborate drawings accom- panying Mr. Brown’s memoir on Rafflesia; and the part published last year contains a paper by Mr. Bauer ‘ On the Ergot of Rye,’ from materials collected between the years 1805 and 1809. The plate which accompanies the last-mentioned paper is derived from drawings which form part of an extensive series in the British Museum, illustrative of the structure of the grain, the germination, growth and development of wheat, and the diseases of that and other Cerealia. ‘his admirable series of drawings constitutes perhaps the most splendid and important monument of Mr. Bauer’s extraordinary talents as an artist and skill in microscopic investigation. ‘The sub- ject was suggested to him by Sir Joseph Banks, who was engaged in an inquiry into the disease of Corn known under the name of “Blight,” and the part of Mr. Bauer’s drawings which relates to that disease was published in illustration of Sir Joseph’s memoir on the subject, and has been several times reprinted with it. Mr. Bauer has himself given, in the volume of the ‘ Philosophical Transactions’ for 1823, an account of his observations on the Vibrio Tritici of Gleichen, with the figures relating to them ; and another small por- tion of his illustrations of the Diseases of Corn has since been pub- lished by him in the ‘ Penny Magazine’ for 1833. His figures of a somewhat analogous subject, the Apple-blight and the Insect produ- cing it, accompany Sir Joseph Banks’s Memoir on the Introduction of that Disease into England, in the 2nd volume of the ‘ Transactions of the Horticultural Society.’ Before the close of the last century Mr. Bauer commenced a series of drawings of Orchidee, and of the details of their remarkable struc- ture, to which he continued to add, as opportunities offered, nearly to the termination of his life. A selection from these, which form one of the most beautiful and extensive series of his botanical draw- ings, was lithographed and published by Professor Lindley between Linnean Society. 441 the years 1830 and 1838, under the title of ‘ Illustrations of Orchi- daceous Plants.’ His other published botanical works are: 1. The first part, published in 1818, of ‘ Strelitzia Depicta,’ a work intended to comprise figures of all the known species of that magnificent genus; 2. ‘ Microsco- pical Observations on the Red Snow’ brought from the Arctic Re- gions by Capt. Ross, the globules contained in which, by some re- garded as an Alga, he described in the 7th volume of the ‘ Quarterly Journal’ of the Royal Institution as a species of Uredo; 3. ‘Some Experiments on the Fungi which constitute the colouring matter of the Red Snow,’ published in the ‘ Philosophical ‘Transactions’ for 1820; and 4. The Plates to the Botanical Appendix to Captain Parry’s first Voyage of Discovery, published in 1821. One of the last pro- ductions of his pencil, illustrating the structure of a plant growing at Kew which produces perfect seeds without any apparent action of pollen, will appear in the forthcoming part of our Transactions. In the year 1816 he commenced lending the assistance of his pencil to the late Sir Everard Home in the various anatomical and physiological investigations in which that distinguished anatomist was engaged ; and in the course of ten or twelve years furnished, in illustration of his numerous papers in the ‘ Philosophical Transac- tions,’ upwards of 120 plates, which were afterwards reprinted with Sir Everard’s ‘ Lectures on Comparative Anatomy. ‘These plates, which form together the most extensive series of his published works, embraced a great variety of important subjects, chiefly in microscopic anatomy, and afford abundant evidence of his powers of observation and skill in depicting the most difficult objects. It is this rare and previously almost unexampled union of the ob- server and the artist that has placed Mr. Bauer foremost in the first rank of scientific draughtsmen. His paintings, as the more finished of his productions may well be termed, are no less perfect as models of artistic skill and effect, than as representations of natural objects. Of all his predecessors, Ehret alone approaches him in these par- ticulars ; among his contemporaries, none but his brother Ferdinand can be regarded as his equal. Mr. Bauer became a Fellow of the Linnean Society in 1804, and of the Royal Society in 1820. He died at his residence on Kew- Green on the 11th of December last, in the 83rd year of his age ; and was buried in the church-yard of that parish on the 16th of the same month. [See also p. 77 of the present volume. ] Sir Anthony Carlisle, Knt., F.R.S., &c., a distinguished surgeon and physiologist, was born at Stillington, in the courty of Durham, on the 8th of February, 1769, and received his early professional education partly at York and partly at Durham. He afterwards came to London, entered himself as a student at the Hunterian School under Cruickshank and Baillie, and became a resident pupil to Watson, whom he succeeded as one of the Surgeons of the West- minster Hospital in 1793. On the retirement of Sheldon, in 1808, he became Professor of Anatomy to the Royal Academy, and re- tained that office until 1824. He was also a member of the Council and of the Court of Examiners of the Royal College of Surgeons, of 442 Linnean Society. which College he was twice President. At the accession of George the Fourth he was knighted as a mark of acknowledgment to his professional skill. He died at his house, in Langham Place, on the 2nd of November last. and was buried in the Cemetery at Kensal Green. Mr. Carlisle became a Fellow of the Linnean Society in 1792, and of the Royal Society in 1804; and his most important contri- butions to Natural Science are contained in the Transactions of these Societies. His paper on the Structure and (Economy of Tenia, in the second volume of our Transactions, is probably the first attempt to illustrate the structure of Hntozoa by artificial injec- tions, and established, among other points, the non-existence of an anus in the Tenia. At this early period, Mr. Carlisle anticipated M. Virey’s idea of the state of the nervous system in the lowest animals, on which the chief character of Mr. MacLeay’s Acrita is founded, ascribing to the Tenie a diffused condition of the nervous substance, and referring to John Hunter as having, in his lectures, applied that character to many of the lower tribes of animals. Of his papers in the ‘ Philosophical Transactions,’ the first in im- portance and originality is the memoir ‘On the peculiar arrange- ment of the Arteries in Slow-moving Animals;’ and it is on the striking discovery detailed in it that his memory as a comparative anatomist will chiefly rest. His paper on the Physiology of the Stapes, published in the volume for 1805, affords a good example of the application of Comparative Anatomy to the elucidation of a difficult physiological question; almost all the facts contained in it relating to the form and structure of the stapes in various animals were new. The Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Organ of Hearing formed the subject of his Lectures at the College of Sur- geons in 1818. His Lectures on Extra-vascular Substances, also delivered at the College of Surgeons, but of which an abstract only of a small por- tion was published in the ‘ Annals of Philosophy,’ are alluded to in high terms by Mr. Lawrence. In 1820, and again in 1826, he de- livered the Hunterian Orations at the College. The latter of these, containing the Anatomy of the Oyster, has been quoted in reference to the observations which indicate the sensibility of the Oyster to light. He also spent much time in experiments on the growth and reparation of Shell. In the prosecution of his various inquiries he enriched the Museum of the College with some unique examples of his peculiar anatomical skill. Besides these contributions to Comparative Anatomy and Animal Physiology, Mr. Carlisle communicated to the Horticultural Society a memoir ‘On the connection between the Leaves and Fruit of Vegetables, with other Physiological Observations,’ and another paper published in the 2nd volume of the Transactions of that So- ciety. The Bishop of Chichester. Lord Henry John Spencer Churchill. Sir John William Lubbock, Bart. The Rev. Thomas Rackett, M.A., F.R.S., &c., during a long life Linnean Society. 443 successfully cultivated various branches of Natural Science and the liberal arts. Associated in his school-days with Hatchett, and after- wards with Maton, Pulteney and Cavallo, he became attached to the pursuits by which his friends were distinguished, and assisted warmly in the promotion of their views. In the years 1794 and 1796, he accompanied the two former in the tours which Dr. Maton subsequently published under the title of ‘ Observations relative chiefly to the Natural History, Picturesque Scenery, and Antiquities of the Western Counties of England,’ and furnished with his pencil the embellishments of that work, which was inscribed to him ina friendly and grateful dedication. In conjunction with Dr. Maton, he published in the 7th volume of our Transactions ‘ An Historical Account of Testaceological Writers,’ and in the 8th ‘A Descriptive Catalogue of the British Testacea.’ These works may be justly characterized as manifesting extensive research, careful comparison, and accurate observation: the latter long continued to be the text- book of British Conchologists. Dr. Maton and himself also pub- lished in our 8th volume ‘An Account of some remarkable Shells found in cavities of a Calcareous Stone, called by the stone-masons Plymouth-Rag ; and he subsequently contributed to the 11th volume ‘ Observations on Cancer salinus,’ and to the 12th, ‘ Observations on a Viper found in Cranborne Chace, Dorsetshire,’ which he presumed to be Coluber Chersea, L. In addition to his skill in the use of the pencil, he was an accomplished musician, and devoted much of his time to antiquarian research, as well as to the prosecution of Natural and Experimental Philosophy. Mr. Rackett became a Fellow of the Linnean Society in 1795, and of the Royal Society in 1803. In the year 1780 he was insti- tuted to the Rectory of Spettisbury and Charlton, in the county of Dorset, and died on the 29th of November last, at the advanced age of 85, after an incumbency of more than sixty years. The Rev. John Revett Sheppard, M.A. Lord Viscount Valentia. Nicholas Aylward Vigors, D.C.L., F.R.S., M.RI.A., &¢., one of the most eminent ornithologists of the present day, was born in 1787 at Old Leighlin, in the county of Carlow, where his family had long been settled. He was educated at Trinity College in the Uni- versity of Oxford, and gave early proof of the diligence and success with which he pursued his classical and literary studies, by pub- lishing in 1810 ‘ An Enquiry into the Nature and Extent of Poetick Licence.’ ‘Towards the close of 1809 he purchased an Ensigncy in the Grenadier Guards, and was severely wounded in the action at Barrosa, in the early part of 1811. On his return to England in the same year he quitted the army, and for the next twenty years devoted himself to the study of Zoology, and especially of birds and insects. In both these departments he formed extensive col- lections, and at a subsequent period liberally presented them to the Zoological Society, of which he was the first Secretary and one of the most zealous and active promoters. On the death of his father he succeeded to the family estate, and in 1832 became the repre- sentative in Parliament of the borough of Carlow, for which, or for 444 Linnean Society. the county of the same name, he continued to sit until the termina- tion of his life on the 26th of last October. Mr. Vigors became a Fellow of this Society in 1819, and is author of an important paper in the 14th volume of our Transactions, ‘ On the Natural Affinities that connect the Orders and Families of Birds.’ In this elaborate memoir he applied to the whole Class of Birds the principles of the quinary arrangement propounded by Mr. W. 8. MacLeay in the ‘ Hore Entomologice,’ of which he continued through life to be one of the most ardent supporters. In the suc- ceeding volume he published, in conjunction with Dr. Horsfield, the first part of ‘A Description of the Australian Birds in the collection of the Linnean Society, with an attempt at arranging them accord- ing to their Natural Affinities,’ in which the same principles were further developed and applied to the illustration of the Raptorial and Insessorial Orders. His only other contribution to our Transac- tions consists of a ‘ Description of a new Species of Scolopaxr lately discovered in the British Islands; with Observations on the Anas glocitans of Pallas, and a description of the Female of that Species,’ contained in the 14th volume. The first of his papers in the ‘ Zoological Journal’ appeared in 1824; in 1827 he became its principal editor, and so continued until its termination in 1834. Of his numerous ornithological memoirs published in that work, perhaps the most important is his ‘ Arrange- ment of the Genera of Birds ;’ which, although scarcely more than a bare enumeration of names, contains the most complete outline of his views on the subject of classification. Some of his notices in the ‘ Zoological Journal’ are on Entomological subjects ; and several valuable papers, written in conjunction with Dr. Horsfield, are de- scriptive of new or rare Mammalia in the collection of the Zoological Society. For several years before his death the active part which he took in politics precluded his paying much attention to Zoology, but he retained to the last a considerable interest in his former pur- suits, especially in connexion with the Zoological Society. He con- tributed many valuable notices to the ‘ Proceedings’ of that Society, Major-General Viney. Robert Montague Wilmot, M.B. Rev. William Wood, B.D., and Francis Boucher Wright, Esq. Among the Associates Henry Woods, Esq., a surgeon, formerly resident at Bath, and subsequently at Camden Town, near London, who was well versed in the study of the Mammalia, a ‘ Natural History’ of which he was for many years engaged in preparing for the press. This work, which was intended to be on a very extensive scale, has never ap- peared. He was author of ‘ An Introductory Lecture on the Study of Zoology,’ of a memoir ‘On a new Species of Antelope,’ in the 5th volume of the ‘ Zoological Journal,’ and of one or two notices in the ‘ Proceedings of the Zoological Society.’ A few years before his death he quitted the neighbourhood of London and returned to Bath, where he became Secretary to the Literary Institution, and died on the 18th of August last, at the age of 46. Miscellaneous. 445 MISCELLANEOUS. Third Meeting of the Men of Science of Italy.—The men of science of Italy have selected Florence as the place of their third meeting, as well from its being the place which, after having given birth to the revival of literature and the arts, was the cradle of experimental philosophy, as from its being the royal seat where was first enter- tained the thought of this new and great institution, and in which a high-minded prince has raised to the divine Galileo a temple wherein his manuscripts and apparatus will be preserved as a large part of the glorious inheritance of Italy. It occurred to every one that the friends of science assembled in Florence, in the midst of such numerous splendid mcenuments of art and science of past and present times, would feel incited by these recollections to pursue the course gloriously opened by our fore- fathers, and by so duing would pay the deserved tribute of their gra- titude to the prince who encouraged the progress of the sciences, and promoted the honour of his country. It is satisfactory to announce, that the Grand Duke, our sovereign, approving the selection of his capital for the place of the third meet- ing of the Italian Savans, and having promised to aid its objects in every manner with his royal bounty and patronage, permits that the meeting should commence the 15th of September, 1841, to continue to the end of that month. The regulations determined on at the first meeting in Pisa have conferred the right of taking part in the scientific meeting on the Italians belonging to the principal academies or scientific societies for the advancement of natural knowledge; the professors of the physical and mathematical sciences; the directors of the higher branches of study, or of the scientific establishments of the various states of Italy; and the chief officers of the corps of engineers and artillery. Foreigners coming under any of the above descriptions will be also admitted to the meeting. We feel sure that our brethren who enjoy the privilege of attend- ing the meeting will gladly avail themselves of it, and thus contribute to the great advantages which it confers upon the whole body of speculative and practical sciences. It is hoped that the invitation to scientific foreigners will prove not less effectual, as the estimation in which they hold Italian science is a pledge that they will be anxious to witness all that Italy has done and is doing, and to afford their cooperation in the noble undertaking. A future advertisement will announce the final and special arrange- ments for the meeting and for the accommodation of those who may attend it. In the mean time, it is satisfactory to state that there have been elected to the office of Assessors, Prof. Gaetano Georgini, Superintendent of the Studies of the Grand Duchy, and Cay. Giu- seppe Gazzeri, Prof. in the University of Pisa. Florence, Dec. 28, 1840. The President General, The Secretary Generel, Marchese Cosimo Ridolfi. Cay. Ferdinando Tarturi. 446 Miscellaneous. Dr. Lush on the Madi, or Chili Oil-seed, Madia sativa.—‘‘ We in- sert a paper by Dr. Lush, of the Medical Establishment of this Pre- sidency, which brings to notice a new seed, called the ‘ Madi, or Chili Oil-seed,’ which promises to be a valuable adjunct to the plants of that class in this country. It appears to flourish in a high and dry land, and will probably succeed in the Deccan and Southern Mahratta country. Dr. Lush has presented it to the Agricultural and Horticultural Society in Bombay, by whom it will be tested and its uses fully developed. “The demand which now exists for oil-seeds from British India has caused much attention to be drawn towards such products as may be raised in sufficient quantities, and at such a price, as may ensure them a permanent place among Indian exports to England. On the western side, or the districts under Bombay, we find, that for field produce as oil-seeds we must lock out for such articles of cul- - tivation as will not require irrigation, seeing that the sesamum, the kerday, the linseed, and the castor-oil are all produced in different districts of our Presidency as dry crops. Besides those already men- tioned, we find a quickly-growing plant in the Deccan, sown usually with the ordinary crops of bajree and pulse, viz. the Verbesina sativa (since called Guizotia oleifera), or Black Til. This plant is valuable to the natives from its quick and hardy growth in a dry climate and scanty monsoon; but from the small quantity of oil in proportion to the bulk, and the inferior quality of that oil, it is not a plant likely to attract attention beyond local wants. “The Madi (Madia sativa) is a plant of the same habit, and allied in botanical characters to the Verbesina. It has lately been grown in England by one or two experimentalists, in the hope of obtaining an indigenous oil of a superior quality. Professor Lindley, who has grown a portion at the Horticultural Society’s garden at Chiswick, is of opinion that the climate of England is too damp and cold for the Madi; and on my requesting to be furnished with seed for trial in the dry parts of India, he kindly sent me a liberal supply (which I have brought here overland), and agrees with me in the opinion that it will stand a good chance in the high and dry lands of the Deccan and other similar districts of India. A plant requiring no more care in the cultivation than the black til of the Deccan, and producing an oil second only to that of the almond and olive, and superior to the sesamum (the common ‘sweet oil’ of Western India), must prove a valuable addition to the produce of the country, and as such I com- mit it to the care of the Agricultural and Horticultural Society of Bombay without further recommendation, merely subjoining a notice of what has already been mentioned by authors about this hitherto neglected plant. *‘DeCandolle, in his ‘Prodromus,’ gives a full description of the plant, and notices shortly that the seed is used for making an oil. This oil, however, does not seem to have attracted the notice of commer- cial persons, and the only account of it I could procure in London was kindly pointed out to me by my friend Professor Don, in a work published in the year 1711 (in the library of the Linnean Society of Meteorological Observations. 447 London), ‘ Histoire des Plantes Médicinales de Perou et de Chili,’ by Mons. Feuillée. Of this account the following is a translation : ««* An admirable oil is made from the seeds of this plant through- out all Chili. The natives make use of it not only as a local appli- cation to assuage pain, anointing with it the parts affected, but also as a condiment, and besides for burning in lamps. I found it,’ says M. Feuillée, ‘ sweeter and of a more agreeable taste than the greater part of our olive oils; its colouristhesame. ‘There are no olives in Chili, and whatever olive oil is found there is brought from Peru, where a large quantity is made.’ ‘“«T beg to present the Society with an original coloured drawing of this plant, made for me in August last at Chiswick, by Mr. Hart, lately draughtsman to the Botanical Register.—Cuar.es Lusu, M.D.” Bombay Gazette, 26th November, 1840. Diurnea Novembris, November Dagger.—Several specimens of both sexes of this insect I have taken in this neighbourhood; the males fly in quest of the females towards midday. I could only find them in copulation upon the blades of grass, although at other times they rest upon the balls of the oaks. The 11th of October was the time when they first appeared, and continue for three weeks.—Roxzerr S. Epseron. 11 Derby Street, Cheetham, Manchester. METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS FOR MAY 1841. Chiswick.—May 1. Fine: very hot: clear. 2. Very fine: cloudy. 3. Rain. 4. Foggy: cloudy and fine: very heavy fall of rain at night. 5. Rain: cloudy and fine: lightning at night. 6. Rain: cloudy. 7. Fine: rain. 8. Heavy showers. 9,10. Very fine. 11. Overcast: slight rain atnight. 12, Cloudy and fine. 13. Fine. 14—16. Very fine. 17. Cloudy and windy. 18. Fine. 19. Rain with strong wind. 20. Boisterous: showery: cold at night. 21. Dry haze: rain. 22. Showery and mild. 23, Slight haze: cloudy and fine. 24. Fine. 25. Very fine. 26. Hotanddry. 27. Sultry: much sheet-lightning at night, with occasionally some of the zigzag and forked kind, together with thunder, and abrupt showers falling in large drops. 28. Sultry: very fine. 29. Very fine: lightning at night. 30,31. Overcast and very fine. Boston.—May 1. Fine: therm. 66° half-past 2 p.m. 2 Cloudy: rain with thunder and lightning p.m. 3. Cloudy. 4. Cloudy: rain early a.m. 5. Rain. 6. Cloudy: rain early a.m. 7. Cloudy: rainr.m. 8. Rain. 9. Fine. 10. Cloudy. 11. Fine: therm. 72° 3 o’clock p.m.: rainr.m. 12. Cloudy. 13. Fine. 14. Cloudy. 15. Fine: therm. 69° 3 o’clock p.m. 16. Fine. 17. Cloudy: rain -pm, 18. Cloudy. 19. Rain: stormy p.m. 20. Stormy: rain a.m. and p.m. 21. Fine. 22. Cloudy: rain early am. 23. Cloudy. 24—27. Fine. 28. Cloudy: therm. 79° 3 o'clock p.m.: rainp.m. 29. Fine. 30. Cloudy. 31. Fine. N.B. This May month has been warmer than any preceding May month since 1834. Applegarth Manse, Dumfries-shire.—May 1, Fair and fine: thunder. 2. Driz- zling afternoon. 3. Fair: frosty: hail. 4. Rainallday. 5. Rain occasionally. 6. Fair and fine. 7. Rain for four hours. 8. Rain p.m.: thunder. 9. Fair till night: rain p.m. 10. Fair but cloudy. 11. Wet a.m.: cleared up. 12—15. Fair and fine. 16, 17. Wet nearly all day. 18, 19. Showers a.m., then fine. 20. Showers. 21. Fair and fine. 22. Wet a.m.: fine p.m. 23. Fair but gloomy, 24. Fine summer day. 25, 26. Bright and cool. 27. Parching wind and hot sun. 28, Fine: rained a little. 29. Fair and fine. 30. Soft rain from eleven to four. 31. Fine summer day. roa mpl ii Ws ii cma i a a aaa a a a ld a ‘uvayl |PZ-€ | oP-1/ O1-z| “wing V-PP 2-09 S-8S €8-0F'SE.69 V-2S | 0-89 | 9-69 | 11-62} 002-62) 87-62 | 662-6 | 226-62 | 916.62 | ‘uxayy “5 | fT | tas | sm fa ts | ab] g9] 99} 6h | 82 |€-29| 9-84] 2-99 | 06-62 | 82.62 | €F-6z | 966-62 | zho.0€ | 990-08 | “1¢ 6¢ fee fo “MS | CN |*MN| “MN | GP! €9/5-69) OV | PL | 0-85 | 6-14 |S-19 | 96-62 | Z0-0€ | Ph-6z | 626-62 | 910-08 | gLo.08 | ‘of SG |" |G0. /€0. | *** | sms juneo| x | smn |f2S| €9| LO] PS | ZL [L291 €.94/2-S9| 00-08 | 00-c€ | gh.62 | 190-08 | 960.08 981-0 | "6% $9 (O81 | ("| * | OTE | sms jaipea| ms} cass | 09) ZL} 89/ 19 | 0g |8:F9/0-64|£-02 | 06-62 | 08-62 | 02-62 | £68-6z | 8£0-0€ | 900.08 "8 99 | 7° | | €0. | °° | can Jute] “aN | “aN | 1G) gL! 69] 09 | zg |0-09|P-6L\L-1L| $9.62 | $6.62 | SE-6z | £28-62 | 288-62 | 096-6z LEC z9 sasinnl|ieasrenal|aetete tee | aga ‘a |‘an | ‘ON ‘ov L9|} 19} 89 | 0g |0-S9/0.04|L-L9 | €0-0€ | Z1-08 | 89-62 | SS6-6z | 040-0 OVI-0f | *9% Wee O.tesezraleamepiese |" 2° ‘a | a | aN] “N | CV) 79 \S-S9| PS | EL |§-SS| 9.02 |S-€9 | Lz-0€ | $%-0€ | 69.6 | EE1-0€ | SOT-0€ | ozz-08 | “cz j SS |v [cys] ct | sms fonyeo) x | “an | 67 F690] 99/19] o£ |9-€S/€.02|S-€9 | OL-0€ | oT-08 | 19-62 | LET-0€ | Ogt-0€ | zhz.0f “Ps [HG dere [cee | ee | ee | “< juyeo) as) “s | 67) 19] 9S| OF | SZ |L-€9/z.h9|€-8S | S0-08 | 06-62 | SP-6z | 66-6 | 6ST-0€ | OFo.0€ | “Ez | VS |“ 120.) 10. | CET. | ms jue) *s | “x | gh) 19| SS| Eh | a9 |G-99/ 9.69 |2.69 | 09-62 | 02.62 | 01-62 | L09-6z | 119-62 ZL9-63 | *3S @S | 7 (60. |r. | PPO. | ms jujeo] ca | cana |Feh) 699-29} S| 69 | P-8P| L-LO|L-89 | F9.62 | 19.62 | 61-62 | 925-62 | LP9-6z | z0L.60| ‘Iz eS jo |“ (90. | S20. | sm |-ms|*ms| “m | SPiZoG| PS! 6E | 19 L-0S | 9-66 |3-89 03-62 | €8-8% | S9.8z | £92-6% | 8LS-62 | 8z°.62 | *oz@ GG A100. Gq le a "MAN| S| “S| SH| 8S} ZS) LP | 09 |€-19) L.S9 |€.S9 | $g.gz | 96.80 | LL.8z | 082-62 | 7L9-62 | YOP-60| °61 | VS | |Z0- |zo. | “7 [ms | -m |rms} 8 | oF f0S| 2S| oF | 99 |F-6F10.£0 8-LG 93-62 | G1-6% | 06.8% | 1€S-6% | £S9-62 | 019.6% | “81 | SS op | 110. | | cms [ems toms} slop) 9919.69] Gh | go |€.29]| 0.02 |£-89 | 01-62 | 02-62 | £6-8z | 81S-6z | 269-62 ¥99-6% | “LI | . an OS {79-0 |“ |" |" |tmsm] em | cms] sass |fop $99! 09] 6 | PZ | 0-67 | 0.99 | LES | 6P-6% | 09-62 | ¥Z-6z | VL9-6% | 116-62 | 896-62) “91 OG pw | pe | wr | ts jupeo sm | es | PH) 6S] 19] oF | PL | L-8F| F.69 \2-69| bg-62 | 00-0 | 65-62 | £P0-0€ | P6I-08 | Phz.08 | “Ct OV | | pce ft | tats juupea) an] an lf€p §29| SS] ob | So |¢.9F | 9.9 |L-€9| 11-08 | £2.08 | £8-6z | 29z-08 | FOS-0€ | Pab.of | “Fy OG | | eee | | cms forgo] “aN | “NX | 6£/¥09| 89.1 9€ | 99 G-LV | P-£9 | LSS | 92-08 | Gz-0€ | LL-6z | VIE-0€ OS | “** }S0- | *** | 610+ |*msm |uuyeo| ‘an | “mun | of | 29/¢.99| 68 | zo 0-€9 | L-0L |0-LG | 61-0£ | 90-0€ | $S.6% | 8Z1-0€ | LPZ-0€ | 061-08 | ‘at Sie: | aston | came “|The em "S |*ms| ‘Ss *s |¥09\f9S| 9) oF | LL | | 8:£9 |%:Z9 | Lg-6% | GL.62 | SP-6z | £00-0€ | PS0-0€ | F60-08 | “11 POG ptf fe te feast tm | ems] s | oF | 9S) 6S] oF | So |0.€9/ €.€9 |z-09 | 09.62 | £2-62 | 06-62 | LIT-0€ | EST-08 | ogt.0€ | ‘oT | OG | 100. | | PHO. | sms | sm | tas} os | LE) Go lG¢.99| 0S | So | £-Lh 12-22 /€-9S | 09-62 | SL.62 | PP-6z | 900-0€ | £60.08 | 760.08 | VS 08-0 |9€- Ol. | OIL. | *mss | «m | oms} 2 es 19 =a StH SRAD ise) wD = “UR § "905 “AOYY *puo’'y ture g | UAL Xe “UIA | “XP | “ONAL | xeyy | "Ue 6 sud Fg | sure 6 ‘uy | "xe *artys ee OL 86 ; 009" Loy p s *1O4SISaI-J[ag TUE “ule oy 55 * |:uopuo'y -ung| “UR 6G “AVN ars a:| —_— pashan |) 18 -sa1uing "YOIMsIY | “00g hoy + uopuoT | ‘aatys-soryUNG a syormstyg = fF MOPMO'L) “uquojy Pe ileal Pa Y joskeq *aatys -satyuind *uojsog suopuo'T ‘urd [ YOIAsty) “yuiod “MoT “Ul “PULA *JOJOWIOULAIY T, *aJIWOIV THE ANNALS AND MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. No. 46. AUGUST 1841. XLIV.—On Gloionema paradoxum. By the Rey. M. J. BERKELEY, M.A., F.L.S. [With a Plate. ] Tue genus Glotonema has been long considered as consisting of productions of a very doubtful nature. Some of its species indeed have been rejected as the ova of insects ; but notwith- . Standing the communication of Roberge* to the Linnzan Society of Paris, who is stated to have proved by repeated experiments that Gloionema paradoxum is not a vegetable, the species is still retained by Agardh+. Kiitzing{ also, who re- jects the other species as ova, though he refers to Agardh’s treatise, and therefore must have known of Rober ge’s expe- riments, still retains this, and has published it as an alga in his ‘ Decades.’ Kiitzing, indeed, informs us that he kept his specimens in water for many weeks or even months without obtaining any positive result ; and Prof. Nitzsch, to whom he communicated the production, was hot more successful. No detail of M. Roberge’s experiments, as far as I am aware, has as yet been published; I have therefore no hesita- tion in offering to public notice my own observations, made at the end of last May, which completely confirm the report of Roberge, and which must be considered as quite decisive. I have not indeed had an opportunity of comparing my in- dividuals with authentic foreign specimens, but they agree so completely with Kiitzing’s description, that I have not the least doubt of their identity. So early as 1825 I found a small patch at Cherry Hinton, near Cambridge, and communicated a sketch to Dr. Greville. The production was however considered of so doubtful a na- ture that it was not published in my ‘ Gleanings of British Aleze, nor is it included in the English Flora. I did not meet with it again till May 25, 1841, when I found a large mass at King’s Cliffe, forming a leosely reticulated mass of tortuous, very elastic, yellow-green threads, several inches in extent, * Linn. Soc. Par. 1827, p. 47. + Conspectus Criticus Diatomacearum, p. 30. t Bot. Zeit. 1833, vol. ii. p. 513. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2G 450 Rey. M. J. Berkeley on Glovonema paradoxum. suspended near the surface of the water on grasses and aquatic plants. The threads were of considerable length, sometimes invested with a transparent gelatinous sheath, sometimes naked. They contained one or two rows of boat-shaped bodies, ;8,,ths of an inch long, ;55ths broad, with one ex- tremity a little broader. The broad extremities all pomted the same way, except by accidental circumstances a few had become transverse. The threads, with their gelatinous sheath, measured ;32,ths of an inch in diameter, without the coat about >,55ths. The grains contained a grumous mass, ofa yellow-green co- lour, surrounded by a rather broad pellucid border. The ex- ternal surface was perfectly smooth, but the border marked with little flexuous lines perpendicular to it, which are in fact seated on a membrane which intimately lines the outer coat of the grain. A portion of the mass was placed in a glass of water, and on the following morning a sensible change had taken place. At one or both ends the contents had contracted, leaving the outer shell at those points perfectly smooth and colourless, while the pellucid border still surrounding the central mass was marked with the above-mentioned lines, which, if I am not mistaken, are composed of very minute longitudinally-arranged granules. Meanwhile the grumous mass appeared more cellular *, with its margin light. In the afternoon of the same day the larger globules were confined to the broader or anterior end, while towards the other end the mass had become paler. Sometimes there were a few large globules, possibly air-bubbles, between the two mem- branes at the anterior end. On the following morning a dark patch appeared in the centre of the mass, and in some indi- viduals seen laterally this patch was applied to the chord of the granule, while the upper margin was crenulated. In the evening of the same day the crenulations had extended to the dark mass, and the large globules were less visible, while in some individuals the contents were in motion and the parts greatly confused. The membrane was soon burst, and a larva disclosed, most probably belonging to the Tipulide. The larvee were about twice as long as the eggs, and the posterior part, when in situ, wrapped in a somewhat spiral way, to allow of its being packed in so small a compass. On careful exa- mination of other eggs, I could distinguish the red spots which mark the place of the eyes, but the whole too confused to admit of my making an intelligible figure. The larva consists of thirteen articulations, including the head, decreasing slightly towards the hinder extremity. The * This accords with the observations of Dumortier, Pouchet, &c., on the cellular formation of the vitellus. Rev. M. J. Berkeley on Exotic Fungi. 451 last articulation, however, is not so strongly marked as the rest. The head is large, ovate, with two red eyes in front, and two short, conical, obscurely-articulated antenne; the mouth is furnished with two strong maxilla, which, when the animal is at rest, are completely retracted and out of sight. The first articulation of the body is furnished with two short feet, crowned at their extremities with a few short bristles. Down the centre of this and the following articulations is a dark line, marking the situation of the intestines. ‘The last joint is also furnished with two short conical feet, or append- ages crowned with short bristles, and a conical projection in the centre, crowned with about eleven pellucid cilia, which are undoubtedly the temporary lungs. I have frequently seen the animal comb them out with his large maxilla. On each side of the branchial tubercle is a short conical appendage. I must leave entomologists to decide the affinities of the little larva, and must beg them to pardon any errors in my description of it. I did not witness any further change, as the larve soon died, and the mass became clothed with mu- cedinous filaments. EXPLANATION OF THE FIGURES IN PLATE XIII. a. Portions of filaments, with eggs magnified. 1. Appearance of an egg, highly magnitied, soon after the specimens were brought home. z Ditto on the following morning. 4. Ditto at six o’clock p.m. 5 6. 7. Ditto with the articulations strongly marked, and the dark mass (= vi- tellus) which furnishes the intestines. 8. Larva just burst from its shell. * + Ditto the next morning at twelve. XLV.—Supplement to descriptions of Exotic Fungi in * Annals of Nat. Hist.,’ vol. iii. pp. 322 and 375. By the Rev. M. J. BerKELEY, M.A., F.L.S. Since the publication of the two memoirs cited above on the Exotic Fungi in the collection of Sir W. J. Hooker, the dis- covery of a packet of Dr. Richardson’s Arctic Fungi which had been mislaid, and the publication of Fries’s ‘ Epicrisis,’ who had received many of the species from Klotzsch, makes it necessary to give a short supplement. I have also to thank Dr. Montagne for one or two suggestions, of which I have availed myself in the following notes :— 1. Lentinus villosus, |. c. p. 322 = L. fasciatus, Berk., Hook. Journ. of Bot. v. il. p. 146. t. 5. 2. Polyporus vesparius, |. c. p. 323. The specific name, as Dr. Montagne very properly remarks, is too near that of Pol. 2G 452 Rey. M. J. Berkeley on Exotic Fungi. vespaceus, Pers., equally with which it belongs to the genus Hexagona, Fr. I beg therefore to substitute for it Hewagona 3. Pol. dedaleoides, |. c. p. 325, belongs to the genus Tra- metes, Fr., therefore it will stand as Trametes dedaleoides. 4. Dedalea applanaia, \.c. p. 381 = Ded. Palisoti, accord- ing to Dr. Montagne, who remarks that this species and D. repanda vary from two inches to a foot in diameter, and have the stem lateral, eccentric, or even central. 5. Dedalea aspera, |. c. = Lenzites aspera, nob. 6. Dedalea latissima, |. c. p. 382 = D. sinulosa, Fr. Ep. p- 495. 7. Dedalea discolor, |. c. = Lenzites Klotzschii, nob. Pi- leo sessili, suborbiculari, tenui, pluri-zonato, pallide ligaeo demum subbrunneo, glabro, sub-nitido, plus-minus ruguloso. Hymenio obscuriore; lamellis tenuibus, rigidis, subintegris, antice furcatis, postice sinuoso-porosis. Pileus 1—2 inches in diam. On oak. Allied to Lenzites betulina. Dedalea discolor, Fr., is a true Dedalea. 8. Pol. Wightii, \. c. p. 383 = Hexagona Wightii, Fr. Ep. This is referred in my paper to Pol. sinensis, Fr., but it ap- pears erroneously. Fries informs us that the species which I have called Pol. Klotzschii is preserved in old Swedish her- baria as Bol. favus, L., but according to Klotzsch, Bol. favus of the Linnean herbarium* is Hex. tenuis. Dr. Montagne informs me that he has Pol. Klotzschii from Cuba, and that he also has regarded it as new. Pol. Klotzschii, Berk., must therefore be now considered as Trametes sinensis, Fr. 9. P. sericeo-hirsutus, 1. c. p. 384 = Hexagona sericea, Fr. Ep. p. 497. 10. P. fraxineus, |. c. p.389. The only specimen of the spe- cies thus marked in Dr. Richardson’s collection is certainly not P. fraxineus, but I think a young specimen of P. fomeniarius. 11. P. obtusus, Berk. |. c. p. 3890 = Trametes obtusus, nob. 12. P. subcinereus, Berk. 1. c. p.391 = Pol. adustus. Iam obliged to Dr. Montagne for this correction. 13. P. biformis, |. c. p.392. The two fungi which I regarded as what Klotzsch intended here, are named by Fries Pol. arc- ticus and P.pergamenus. Fries, however, had received some- thing else under the name of P. biformis, with which I am not acquainted. The short observation added to Klotzsch’s characters belongs to P. arcticus and P. pergamenus. 14. P. occidentalis, |. c. p. 393 = Trametes occidentalis, Fr. Ep. * Since the above was in type I have examined the specimen and find that it is named by Sir J. E. Smith; it is therefore no authority for Bol. favus, L. It is certainly Hex, tenuis. Rey. M. J. Berkeley on Exotic Fungi. 453 15. Nidularia striata, var. pusilla = N. plicata, Fr., accord- ing to Dr. Montagne. The following species were not included in the list: — 16. Trametes stuppeus, n. s. Apus, suberosus, pileo dimi- diato, convexo, azono, stuppeo-villoso, ochraceo-fulvo; intus hymenioque ligneo-pallidus ; poris magnis, 5—6 angulatis, dis- sepimentorum acie tenuissima. Pileus 2} inches broad, about 1 inch long, clothed with long, dingy, pale, ochraceous tawny, tow-like down. Pores 1th of an inch across, deep behind, shallow in front towards the acute margin. Carlton House, N.A, Ap. 23. Dr. Richardson. Resem- bling Trametes gallica, but very distinct. The surface of the pileus resembles that of Pol. leoninus. 17. Pol. hyperboreus, n.s. Ungulatus, durus, ponderosus ; pileo glabro concentrice sulcato; disco brunneo, margine ob- tuso, pruinoso, cervino; intus pallide cervino. Hymenio convexo «tate angustato, umbrino ; poris minutis rotundis. N.A., Dr. Richardson. Allied to P. igniarius, ligneus, and australis, but certainly distinct. The substance is equally hard, but of a much paler hue. Pileus 2 inches long, 4 inches broad, 2 inches deep, marked with a few concentric furrows ; the older portion brown, the margin pale fawn-colour. Hy- menium growing narrower with age. 18. Pol. badius, n.s. Crassus, durus, subponderosus, ba- dius, intus ferrugineus; pileo parce concentrice sulcato, mi- nutissime ferrugineo-tomentoso, demum glabrato; hymenio levi, poris mediis angulatis, dissepimentis tenuibus. N. A., Dr. Richardson. A very distinct species, with far larger pores than those of Pol. igniarius, with which it agrees in size, and to which it is allied. The surface of the pileus is in parts even and cracked, in parts rough, with small corru- gations. ‘The flatness of the hymenium probably arises from the specimen having been fixed by the vertex. 19. P. lilacino-gilvus, Berk. A single specimen found by Dr. Richardson agrees exactly with the species from Van Diemen’s Land, but is in a very early stage of growth. I saw this species in M. Desmaziéres’ herbarium, marked “ Pol. versicolor, var. incarnata, regu par M. Fée du consul de France au Brazil an 1826.” It is pos- sibly the same then with Pol. Feei, Fr., Linn. v. p. 518. 20. Pol. varius, Fr., N. A., Dr. Richardson. 21. Pol. ferruginosus, Fr., N. A., Dr. Richardson. 22. Exidia glandulosa, Fr., N. A., Dr.Richardson. 23. Nidularia striata, Bull., N. A., Dr. Richardson. 24. Lycoperdon pertusum, Sow. Br. Fung. t. 412. f. 2. Sub- globosum, peridio tenuissimo, membranaceo, furfuraceo-granu- loso, demum lacunis plurimis irreguiaribus pertusum. Capil- 454 Prof. Don on Plants of Lycia and Caria litio pallido. N.A., Dr. Richardson. About the size of a hazel-nut. Sporidia globose, equal in diameter to that of the flocci. Precisely the plant of Sowerby, except that his species is figured with a spurious stem. It is clearly no Rhizopogon, as asserted by Fries. XLVI.—A List of Plants collected by Charles Fellows, Esq., during his Tour in Lycia and Caria; with descriptions of the New Species. By Davip Don, Esq., Prof. Bot. King’s College*. N.B.—Those to which an asterisk is affived are new species, and will be found described at the end. DICOTYLEDONES vy. EXOGEN. RANUNCULACES. Clematis cirrhosa, L. Anemone coronaria, L. apennina, L. Adonis estivalis, Z. Ficaria verna, Huds. BERBERIDES. Bongardia Rauwolfii, C. dA. Mey. PAPAVERACER. Papaver somniferum, L. orientale, ZL. Argemone, L. Glaucium flavum, Crantz. Reemeria hybrida, DeCand. Hypecoum procumbens, L. FUMARIACES. Corydalis tuberosa, DeCand. Fumaria capreolata, L. parviflora, Lam. CRUCIFERZE. Erophila vulgaris, DeCand. Alyssum fulvescens, Sm. Fibigia clypeata, Med. Aubrietia deltoidea, DeCand. Arabis verna, Br. Cardamine hirsuta, L. Diplotaxis tenuifolia, DeCand. Brassica Rapa, L. CISTINER. Cistus cymosus, Dun. salvifolius, L. Helianthemum arabicum, Pers, VIOLARIES. Viola tricolor 0, DeCand. CARYOPHYLLE. Silene Behen, L. vespertina, L. orchidea, L. linoides, O/th. Dianthus prolifer, L. Holosteum umbellatum, L. LINE#. Linum angustifolium, Sm. hirsutum, L. GERANIACE. Erodium cicutarium, Sm. ciconium, Willd. gruinum, Willd. Geranium tuberosum, L. molle, L. lucidum, L. RuTAcEz. Ruta bracteosa, DeCand. RHAMNER. Rhamnus oleoides, Z. Paliurus aculeatus, Lam. * From Mr. Fellows’s ‘Account of Discoveries in Lycia, &c., 1841,’ a work of the highest interest for the valuable and original information which it contains upon ancient art, history, and philology, as well as the present state of the country. collected by Charles Fellows, Esq. 455 EupPHoRBIACES. Euphorbia dulcis, L. rigida, Bied. Mercurialis annua, L. Ricinus communis, L. TEREBINTHACESR. Pistacia Lentiscus, L. LEGUMINOS#. Anagyris feetida, Z. Calycotome villosa, Link. Anthyllis tetraphylla, L. Lotus creticus, L. Melilotus sulcata, Desf. Trifolium fragiferum, L. spumosum, L. subterraneum, L. procumbens, L. Hymenocarpus circinatus, Savi. Medicago orbicularis, All. ——-. uncinata, Willd. —— minima, Lam. marina, L. Psoralea bituminosa, L. Colutea arborescens, L. Coronilla iberica, Bieb. minima, L. Faba vulgaris, Mench. Vicia onobrychoides, L. polyphylia, Desf. hybrida, L. Lathyrus Cicera, L. angulatus, L. Pisum fulvum, Sm. Lupinus hirsutus, L. Cercis Siliquastrum, L. RosacE&. Poterium spinosum, L. TAMARISCINES. Tamarix gallica, L. CucURBITACEE. Bryonia dioica, L. PARONYCHIES. Paronychia argentea, Lam. CRASSULACE. Umbilicus pendulinus, DeCand. UMBELLIFERA. Scandix australis, L. Caucalis daucoides, L. Tordylium officinale, L. Smyrnium perfoliatum, L. RuBIACEZ. Asperula arvensis, L. Galium brevifolium, Sm. V ALERIANES. Valeriana Dioscoridis, Sm. ComPposiIT%. Tussilago Farfara, LD. Inula candida, DeCand. limoniifolia, Lind. Asteriscus aquaticus, Mench. Anthemis arvensis, ZL. rosea, Sm. Achillea cretica, DeCand. Chrysanthemum segetum, L. coronarium, L. Senecio squalidus, L. Gnaphalium luteo-album, L. Helichrysum angustifolium, DeC. Calendula arvensis, L. Carduus crispus, L. Centaurea montana, L. Jacea, L. Tragopogon porrifolius, L. CAMPANULACES. Campanula drabifolia, Sm. STYRACER. Styrax officinale, L. OLEACE. Phillyrea latifolia, L. JASMINE. Jasminum fruticans, L, APOCYNEE. Vinca minor, Z. CuscuTEz. Cuscuta epithymum, L. BoraGINEZ. Myosotis sylvatica, Hoffm. Lithospermum orientale, Willd. Anchusa italica, Retz, 456 Anchusa tinctoria, DL. undulata, L. Cynoglossum officinale, Ih Mattia staminea, Rem. & Schult. Onosma echioides, L. Echium plantagineum, L. creticum, Sm. SoLANACES. Mandragora officinarum, Beriol. Hyoscyamus niger, L. agrestis, Kit. aureus, L. VERBASCINER. Verbascum Thapsus, L. ScROPHULARINER. Veronica cuneifolia*. triphyllos, L. grandiflora*. Cymbalaria, Vahl. Linaria pelisseriana, DeCand. Anarrhinum bellidifolium, Desf. Scrophularia peregrina, L. canina, L. OnroBANCHEZ. Orobanche caryophyllacea, Sm. LABIATR. Teucrium regium, Schreb. Lavandula Stzchas, L. Lamium moschatum, Mill. purpureum, L. Phlomis lycia*. Salvia triloba, L. Horminum, L. Prof. Don on Plants of Lycia and Caria PRIMULACEZ. | Anagallis arvensis, a et /3, L. Cyclamen persicum, L. PLANTAGINES. Plantago cretica, L. CHENOPODIACEA. Salicornia fruticosa, L. POLYGONER. Rumex bucephalophorus, L. —— Acetosa, L. ELZAGNEE. Eleagnus angustifolia, L. | | THYMELEZ. Daphne collina, L. argentea, Sm. Passerina hirsuta, L. LAURINES. Laurus nobilis, L. PLATANES. Platanus orientalis, L. BALSAMIFLUZ. Liquidambar orientale, Mill. CUPULIFERZ. Quercus Ballota, Desf. coccifera, L. —— Aigilops, L. CoNIFERZ. Pinus Pinea, L. carica*. Laricio, Lam. Cupressus sempervirens, a et /3, L. Juniperus communis, L. MONOCOTYLEDONES v. ENDOGEN 4. GRAMINE#. Briza maxima, L. Stipa tortilis, Desf. Xgilops ovata, L. MELANTHACEZ. Merendera Bulbocodium, Ram. LILIACcEz. Fritillaria Meleagris, L. Lloydia greca, Endl. Gagea spathacea, Rem. & Schult. Hyacinthus orientalis, L. Muscari moschatum, Willd. comosum, Willd. botryoides, Willd. Bellevalia romana, Lapeyr. Scilla bifoha, L. Allium nigrum, L. neapolitanum, Cyr. —— triquetrum, L. junceum, Sm. Aloe vulgaris, Sm. Ornithogalum umbellatum, L. collected by Charles Fellows, Esq. 457 Ornithogalum nanum, Sm. Trichonema Columne, Reichenb. Myogalum nutans, Link. Gladiolus communis, L. Asphodelus ramosus, L. segetum, Kit. Asparagus acutifolius, L. OrcHIDE. SMILACER. Orchis papilionacea, L. Smilax aspera, L. provincialis, Balb. Ruscus aculeatus, L. longibracteata, Biv. longicornis, Desf. r DroscorEace2. | Ophrys fusca, Link. Tamus cretica, L. Tenoreana, Lindl. — mammosa, Desf. Ferrum-equinum, Des/. Narcissus Tazetta, L. | Serapias Lingua, L. cordigera, L. AMARYLLIDES. IRIDE. | Iris florentina, L. AROIDES. Sisyrinchium, L. Arum Dracuncuius, L. tuberosa, L. Arisarum vulgare, Schott. ACOTYLEDONES vy. ACROGEN A. Ceterach officinarum, Willd. Cheilanthes odora, Sw. Adiantum Capillus Veneris, L. FInices. LICHENES. Polypodium vulgare, L. Evernia prunastri, Ach. DESCRIPTIONS OF THE NEW SPECIES. Veronica cunetfolia. Y. glanduloso-pubescens; racemis axillaribus, segmentis calycinis oblongis obtusis corolla brevioribus, ovario suborbiculato scabro, foliis subsessilibus cuneatis inciso-crenatis, caule suffruticoso pro- cumbente. Habitat in Lycie rupibus ad Arycandum fluvium. Fruticulus procumbens, ramosissimus, V. savatili partum major. Rami filiformes, purpurascentes, foliosi, fragiles, pube brevissima glandulosa vestiti. Folia opposita, brevissimé petiolata, cuneata, inciso-crenata, coriacea, avenia, utrinque pubescentia, scabriuscula, subtis costa prominente subcarinata, 2-3 lineas longa, sesqui v. 2 lineas lata. /Petioli pubescentes, vix lineam longi, latiusculi, supra canaliculati, subtts obtusé carinati, ima basi subconnati. Racemi in ramis solitarii, axillares, multiflori, pedunculati. Pedun- culus folio longior, filiformis, glanduloso-pubescens, purpurascens. Bractee pedicellis capillaribus longiores ; inferiores inciso-crenate, foliis consimiles ; superiores subspathulate, integerrime. Calyx copiosits glanduloso-pubescens, 4-partitus : segmentis oblongis, obtusis ; 2 anterioribus majoribus. Corolla V. sazatilis, cyanea ? calyce major: tubo brevissimo, violaceo: limbo 4-partito : laciniis rotundatis, integris, venulosis; infimd duplO angustiore. Stamina corolla breviora: filamenta filiformia, glabra, violacea: anthere LYCOPODIACER. Lycopodium denticulatum, L. 458 Prof. Don on Plants of Lycia and Caria subrotunde, biloculares, flave. Ovarium compressum, orbiculare, asperé pubescens, integrum. Stylus capillaris, glaber, corollam superans. Stigma capitatum, exiguum. This is a very distinct and well-marked species, with the habit of V. saxatilis, but there is none with which it can be confounded, and if introduced to our gardens it would prove an interesting addition to the rock-work. Its cuneiform, deeply crenate leaves, and rough pubescent fruit will serve to distinguish it from sawatilis, as well as from every other shrubby species. Veronica grandiflora. V. annua, erecta, glanduloso-pubescens ; floribus solitariis, segmentis calycinis linearibus obtusis, corolla calyce tripld longiore : laciniis rhombeo-ovatis subunguiculatis, foliis inferioribus petiolatis ovatis crenatis ; superioribus sessilibus, pinnatifidis tripartitisve. Habitat in Caria ad Meandrum fluvium, et prope Mylasam. Foret Martio. Radiz fibrosa, annua. Caulis erectus, filiformis, simplex v. ramosus, copiosé glanduloso-pubescens, purpurascens, bipollicaris. Cotyle- dones adhuc persistentes, subreniformes, integerrime, petiolate. Folia inferiora brevissimé petiolata, ovata, obtusa, crenata, 3-5 lineas longa, utrinque pilis brevissimis articulatis, at rard glandu- liferis, copiosé vestita ; superiora sessilia, pinnatifida v. tripartita : segmentis linearibus, obtusis, integerrimis ; terminali majori, sub- spathulato. ores in apice caulis axillares, solitarii, pedunculati. Pedunculi capillares, copiosé glanduloso-pubescentes, foliis tripar- titis ter longiores. Calyx copiosé glanduloso-pubescens, 4-partitus : segmentis linearibus, obtusis ; 2 anterioribus majoribus. Corolla om- nium maxima, diametro semuncialis et ultra, cyanea: tubo bre- vissimo, luteo: Jimbo profunde 4-partito: /aciniis rhombeo-oyatis, obtusis, basi angustata lutea subunguiculatis ; anticd minore. Sta- mina corolla multoties breviora; filamenta gracilia, glabra, lute- scentia: anthere cordato-oblongz, obtuse, violaceze. Ovarium sub- rotundum, glabrum, integrum. Stylus corolla longior, capillaris, glaber, superné incrassatus, subclavatus. Stigma parvum, subca- pitatum. Capsulam nondtm vidi. A truly elegant little plant, well deserving of being added to the catalogue of ornamental annuals, from the size and beauty of its flowers. Its deeply pinnatifid and tripartite leaves, with entire linear or spathulate segments, will readily distinguish it from the V. amena of Steven, and from V. pu- mila, from Mount Hzemus, described and figured in the se- cond volume of Dr. Clarke’s Travels, at page 559. Phlomis lycia. P. fruticosa, ferrugineo-tomentosa; foliis cordato-oblongis obtusis, verticillastris plurifloris, bracteis lanceolatis calycibusque mucro- collected by Charles Fellows, Esq. 459 nato-spinosis densé albo-lanatis, dentibus calycinis uncinatis, fila- mentis inappendiculatis. Habitat in Lyciz septentrionalis sylvis montosis. Suffrutex erectus, ramosus, pedalis, pube stellata rubiginosé undique densé tomentosus. Rami 4-anguli. Folia petiolata, cordato-ob- longa, obtusa, crenata, rugoso-yenosa, utringue tomento stellato copiosé vestita, pollicem longa, semunciam lata ; floralia vix cor- data. Petioli angusti, 3 lineas longi, supra canaliculati. Verti- cillastri terminales, pluri- (6-8) flori. Bractee adpressz, lanceo- late, mucronato-spinose, land longissima molli alba densé vestite. Calyces bracteis vix longiores, extis albo-lanati : fauce pilosissima : dentibus brevibus, subulatis, mucronato-spinosis, apice nudis, unci- natis. Corolla subuncialis, calyce vix dupld longior : tubo glabri- usculo, inferné angustato, superné parim dilatato, intis fasciculis 5 pilorum aucto: fauce intis glabra: limbo extts tomento fasci- culato-ramoso flavicanti subadpresso vestito ; Jabio superiore ga- leato, margine truncato, emarginato ; inferiore longiore, trilobo ; laciniis lateralibus ovatis, obtusis, conduplicatis, supra glabris ; intermedid orbiculata, integra, supra glabra, margine partm undu- lata. Filamenta compressa, inappendiculata puberula. Anthere glabre. Stylus glaber. Stigma bifidum; lobo superiore latiore, obtuso ; inferiore acutiusculo, parim longiore. This plant, Mr. Fellows informs me, is common in moun- tainous woods in the northern parts of Lycia. It is evidently nearly allied to the P. ferruginea of Tenore, but its lanceolate, spinously mucronate, woolly bractes, simple filaments, and subulate, spinous, uncinate calycine teeth, essentially distin- guish it from that species as well as from P. armeniaca. Pinus carica. P. foliis binis prelongis tenuissimis rectis margine denticulato-sca- bris : vaginis abbreviatis subintegris, strobilis ovato-oblongis rectis levigatis : squamis apice rhomboideis depressis truncatis rimulis- que radiatis. Habitat in Cariz montibus. Arbor magna. Ramuli scabriusculi, fusci. Folia bina, erecta, recta, tenuissima, mucronata, nunc levitér tortilia, leté viridia, subtis convexa, levia, nitida, supra canaliculata, margine denticulato- scabra, 6—7-pollicaria: vagine 2-3 lineas long, cylindracee, fuscescentes, annulatim rugose, ore subintegro nudiusculo. Squame stipulares (folia primaria) lanceolate, acuminate, coriacez, spa- dicez, margine filamentoso-ciliate, basi diu persistenti. Strobili ovato-oblongi, obtusi, recti, levigati, nitidi, spadicei, 3-4 pollices longi, diametro 2-unciales : sguamis apice depressis, rhomboideis, planiusculis, transversé subcarinatis, rimulis radiatim notatis, me- dio truncatis, areola transverse elliptica cinerascenti umbilicatis. I have ventured to propose this as a distinct species, al- though, from its near relationship to halepensis, I think it not unlikely that it may prove to be only a remarkable local form of that species. It is chiefly distinguished from halepensis by 460 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. its much longer leaves and larger cones, the apex of whose scales are broader, and marked with numerous radiating fis- sures. The leaves are double the length of those of the mari- tima of Lambert, and the cones are larger and more oblong. XLVII.— Report of the Results of Researches in Physiological Botany made in the year 1839. By F. J. Meyen, M.D., Professor of Botany in the University of Berlin. [ Continued from p. 407. ] In the large and splendid works on Fungi which have been published by M. Corda in the past year, we find some obser- vations which are of interest as regards the physiology of these productions. In describing a mould* called Gonatobo- trys simplex, he says, that in the lower vegetable orders we often see forms represent a lower form of a more highly developed species ; and that in the meeting at Prague (1837) he had directed attention to a considerable number of such types which frequently form parallel series, and endeavoured to show that in the inferior Fungi especially mathematical combinations can be formed if symbols are substituted for the separate organs of the mould or fungus; and that each of the members of the series of combinations produced by the combination of these symbols represents one of those groups of forms which we have hitherto been accustomed to regard as types of genera. M. Corda promises to explain these se- ries, both historically and theoretically as well as practically, in a separate work, and hopes that the moulds of the tro- pical regions may afford several new groups which will fill up the place of the now missing types. In this work M. Corda has also given a plate with figures of Syzygites mega- locarpus, and a full description of the formation of the fruit, which, as is well known, is here accompanied by the phzeno- menon of copulation; he observed that the two pyriform warts from which the fruit is produced not only touch each other, but completely coalesce, so that the contents of both can mix as soon as the partitions between them are absorbed. After the junction of these two branches follows the forma- tion of the fruit ; in the middle of these connate branches are formed one or two cells, which represent the sporangiolum, which in a ripe state is covered with large angular warts. This sporangiolum contains a thick fluid consisting of oil-glo- bules, molecules, and from two to five spores. Frequently the two branches do not join, and then a spherical sporangi- olum is formed at the apex of one or even of both of them. * Prachtflora der europiischen Schimmelbildungen mit 25 Tafeln, 1839. A notice of this has been given by us in vol. iv. at p. 200. Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 461 M. Corda never saw the sporangium of this curious fungus fall off or open, and the seeds when sown did not succeed. Finally, M. Corda remarks, that the copulation of these fertile branchlets has been compared to that of certain Con- fervee, but that this comparison, on a critical examination of both cases, does not appear to be very correct. I also have compared the copulation of Syzygites with that of the Conferve, and after I have carefully examined all the kinds of copula- tion which have been observed in Confervee and Closteriz, I cannot imagine how M. Corda can make such a statement ; it evidently arose from the fact that M. Corda has not exa- mined the phznomena of copulation of the Algz with as much diligence as he has those of the mould, for, particularly in Closteria, the phenomena are quite similar ; and in the Spi- rogyre I have also seen that the usual spore produced by co- pulation again appeared as a sporangiclum, and contained se- veral smaller spores, &c. More important for us are the contents of the third volume of figures of Fungi* which M. Corda has published ; we find therein new researches on the genus 4icidium, which is not as yet correctly understood. M. Corda refers “cidium to the true Gasteromycetes, on account of its peridium: he sowed the spores of Aicidium Tussilaginis on leaves of the Colt’sfoot, which were kept moist, or were immersed in water, and he often succeeded in making them germinate ; they de- veloped on the spore-skin, by means of extension, a wart, which became a cellular filament, producing threads in every direction, as is the case with the spores of all Fungi. By de- grees a fibrous net, or tissue, is formed cut of these threads, similar to that produced by the spores of Fungi, Algz and Moss; these are said to be true germinative threads, and M. Corda says he has seen them penetrate through the stomata of the epidermis into the parenchym of the leaf, and then com- mence dividing into branches. Botanists will readily perceive the importance of these statements: the propagation of the Leaf-fungi has not yet been observed, but a number of hypotheses have been invented to explain it; these will, however, all be done away with, if M. Corda’s statement, that the germinative threads of the spores of Aicidium pass into the parenchym of the leaf through the stomata, is found to be correct. M. Corda saw, moreover, that the little heaps of Mcidium, with their cellular stroma, are fastened on laterally to one of the bundles of vessels in the leaf. These points are illustrated by excellent figures. The larger half of the volume treats of the Hymenomyceta, to which M. Corda reckons not only the Helvellacee, Pezize * Icones fungorum, &c., tom. iii, Prag. 1839. Noticed by us at p. 145, vol. vi. 462 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. and Tremelline, but also the Tubercularine and Coryneacee: however, according to the later observations on the mode of production of the spores, it is absolutely necessary to separate the Octosporidee from the true Hymenomycete with free spores. It is, however, to be desired that this family of Fungi should receive another name, for the sporangia of the large Spherie are also filled with eight spores, and their appearance has much similarity with that of the sporangia of the Pezize, etc. In speaking of the Pezize we have a description of the for- mation of the spores, from which it appears that the spore- skin is formed round the drops of oil which are found with larger and smaller grains in the asci. Here we also have a new theory of the formation of cells, which the spores of the Fungi, according to M. Corda, represent. M. Corda treats very circumstantially of the structure of the hymenium in the true Hymenomycete, and he endeavours to show that the honour of the first exact observations on this subject belongs to him ; for in the winter of 1833-34 he had sent to the Academy of Sciences of Berlin a treatise ‘On the Structure of the Spores of Cryptogamic Plants,’ accom- panied with many figures, in which both the free quaternate spores, the antheridiz, the spore-cuticle, the spore-nucleus and the oily globules, are described and delineated. The greater number of the members of the Academy are said to have thought highly of this work, but the greatest micro- scopical observer of Germany declared these observations to be incorrect: the free quaternate spores were false; the an- theridiz (and partly also the basidia) were, according to his observations, eggs of insects, &c. In the former Reports for 1836, p.51—55, and 1838, p. 167, I have given a historical view of the observations made in this department, and I mentioned M. Corda’s discoveries as published in the ¢ Flora’ of 1833; however, according to the above, M. Corda shortly afterwards published a new work (that read in the Academy), which certainly gives him the justest claims to the confirma- tion and extension of Micheli’s observations; and if his as- sertions could be confirmed by a member of the above-men- tioned Academy, they are certainly to be put before those of M. Léveillé ; the latter, however, states that he had com- municated his results ten years ago to Persoon and others*. * [Ascherson appears to have been the first who made any general exa- mination of the naked spores of Hymenomycetes. Insulated figures and observations were made by several who did not understand the full import- ance of the facts before them. Corda certainly had no general notions on the subject when he figured in 1837 the structure of Coprinus. In the same year analyses of several true Agarics are given by him in Sturm’s Deutschland’s Flora, which repeat still the generally received erroneous no- tions as to their structure.—Ebir. ] Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 463 In the description of the hymenium the three usual layers are mentioned, and a circumstantial description of the lacteous vessels which are found in some of the Agaricini is given; a splendid figure of these vessels, with the whole hymenium of Agaricus fetens, gives the best information on this subject. In Ag. fetens, says M. Corda, there is found between the cells of the two different cellular systems (namely, the layer of tubes and that of spherical cells) a third system, which is interwoven with the others, and which consists of perfect, branched and anastomosing narrow tubes, which have walls proper to them, and contain a milk-like, half transparent, white granular sap, which appears to move slowly in the direction of the tubes. M. Corda believes he may truly say that he first clearly de- scribed and delineated this vascular system in the Fungi, for the drawing which M. Schultz has given of Agaricus deliciosus is very confused and unnatural. These lacteous vessels pass through all organs and tissues of Agaricus fetens ; they are equally distributed, only the gills and the outer layer of the stipes appear to contain more of them. The tubes are clear, almost always of equal thickness, generally serpentine and much branched: and often the cells of the large-celled paren- chym are deposited in rays around the lacteous vessels, and surround them for some distance with a cylindrical layer of cells. Where these vessels approach the surface of a gill they send out peculiar, long, blind (closed) branches, which form with their conical ends the outermost layer of the gill and hymenium. ‘The structure and formation of the organs of fructification are then fully described: the female ones are called, according to Léveillé, basidia ; they consist of the body, the spore-supporters (Sterigmata of M. Corda, an appellation which has, however, already been used.—M.), the contents and the spores. The formation is the same as given in the former Report, p.54. ‘ Every sporophore,” says M. Corda, “produces always but one spore at once, and afterwards se- veral one after the other, exactly in the same manner as the terminal points of the fertile flocci of the Hyphomycete.” Whether this assertion is grounded on actual observations is not stated; and I must beg leave to doubt that the for- mation of spores at the point of the spore-bearer is repeated after the first spores have fallen off. The spores consist, ac- cording to M. Corda, of a cuticle, a nucleus, and of oily glo- bules, and where the spores are terminal they have a conical, pointed or blunt perforated wart, and this opening has been formerly called Hylus, window, navel, etc. Spores with the hylus at the side are to be called spore pleurotrope, and those which have the hylus in the axis, spore trepanotrope ; and M. Corda promises to show at a future period in what 464 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. relation an orthotropic ovulum stands to a trepanotropic spore, &e. The oil-globules in the spores are composed, according to M. Corda’s analysis, of fatty oil in large quantities and an acrid etherial oil. M. Corda also asserts, that in 1833 he pronounced the antheridia of the fleshy Fungi to be anthers, and I have shown in my last Report, that these bodies were first mentioned as generative organs by Bulliard: M. Corda is quite wrong in saying that I stated these organs to be paraphyse, for such an idea never entered my mind. We have, however, often drawn attention to the curious fact, that the so-called anthers, if they really do effectuate the fertilization of the spores, do not appear more frequently and constantly ; and to this M. Corda replies, that there are whole families among the Cryptogams where only spores are found. We may, however, say that this objection does not apply to the Fungi, for we at present know that in those families where male organs have been found, they make their appearance in all genera and all species; in the Fungi on the contrary, and let us only consider the pilei- form and fleshy Fungi, these organs do not appear regularly in two very similar species. M. Corda moreover compares these fungus-anthers with the single pollen-grains of the higher plants, and not with the an- thers, a view held probably by most botanists who have written on this subject; he calls them Pollinaria, a denomination which has already been used in quite a different sense. One statement of M. Corda is very remarkable and worthy of fur- ther examination, viz. that the Boledi, during the development of the anthers, have no trace of the basidia and of the forma- tion of spores, and that these are principally formed when the anthers are almost fully developed. [In Agaricus and Po- lyporus I have formerly directed my attention to this subject, but have not observed anything which could lead to this con- clusion; and in some species of Boletus it is not uncommon to find fully-developed anthers in old, decaying individuals. | M. Corda correctly remarks, that the paraphyses of the Asco- mycete are not to be compared to the anthers of the above- mentioned Fungi. ‘The contents of the anthers are composed, according to M. Corda, of a consistent jelly, which sometimes contains molecules, but sometimes has no distinguishable structure; it is emptied in drops through the point of the cellular sac, and then covers the external surface with a layer of gum, which is often slightly coloured; by means of this substance the spores adhere: whether however, says M. Corda, this fluid fecundates the spore, cannot be ascertained. Mr. Berkeley* has examined the structure of the fruit-bear- * Ann. Nat. Hist. Nov. 1839, p. 155, Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 465 ing organs in the Trichogastre and Phalloide, and found that these groups also belong to the true Hymenomycete. If a young plant of Lycoperdon is cut through, the internal fleshy mass is found to be intersected by small, long, retiform, branched and anastomosing cavities, whose whole surface is covered by an hymenium, which is similarly constructed to that of Boletus and Agaricus, but does not possess a trace of those organs which have been called anthers. Mr. Berkeley thinks that the genera Geastrum, Scleroderma, Batarrea, Tu- lostoma, etc., have a similar structure. In Phallus very young individuals must be examined if we wish to find the hyme- nium; it appears exactly as in Lycoperdon, only the basidia appear all of them to carry spores. If there be more than four spores on one basidium the additional ones are placed laterally. Here, as well as in Lycoperdon, the basidia collapse and are not to be found at a later period. In our former Report* we mentioned a treatise of M. Lé- veillé’s which had been laid before the Philomathic Society at Paris in 1837; it is now publishedt, although apparently a little altered; moreover there are unfortunately no figures, which are absolutely necessary to illustrate M. Léveillé’s views. M. Léveillé contends against the idea of Turpin, that the Uredines are produced from diseased Globuline, by which name M. Turpin means all sap-globules of plants, however dif- ferent they may be in their chemical composition. Moreover M. Léveillé condemns the view of M. Unger according to which the Uredines are produced by a diseased affection of the respi- ratory organs ; for, according to the author’s observations, they are true fungi, among which Persoon placed them. When, says M. Léveillé, these productions are observed in a very young state, there are seen under the discoloured epidermis very fine colourless ramified filaments which are interwoven with each other. When a Uredo is formed, there appears in the centre of this woven mass a fleshy spot or point, which may be compared to a Sclerotium, &c. &c; one surface of this nucleus reposes on the parenchym of the leaf, the other is in contact with the epidermis, and is covered with pedunculated, or more rarely with sessile spores. As the fungus increases the epidermis is extended and bursts, and the spores are ex- posed. The cidia, although possessing a more complicated structure, have a similar process of development, which M. Léveillé describes in that of Euphorbia; the peculiar peridium * Berlin, 1838, pp. 162, 163. + Recherches sur le développement des Urédinées.—Ann. des Se. Nat. tom. xi. part. bot. p. 5—16. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2H 466 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. distinguishes this genus from Uredo, so that they cannot both be comprehended under the name of Ceoma. M. Léveillé re- marks, that Fries has rightly observed the difference between Uredo and Aicidium. M. Leveillé says the granules of Uredo are generally consi- dered as spores, but observations to prove this are very rare : M. Prevost was the first who saw that a byssus-like tissue was produced from spores of Uredo caries, De C., when ex- posed to moisture, and M. DeCandolle has made the same observation. [Even if the production of germinal filaments from the vesicles of the bunt [Schmierbrand] has really been observed, which I have as yet not succeeded in doing, still my own observations on the production of the bunt in Mays (see Report, 1838, p. 162.) show that it is a diseased forma- tion in the interior of the cells, and may be regarded as a true Entophyte.| M. Léyeillé also mentions the production of the bunt in Mays, and says that it is also produced by ramified filaments which are short and jointed, and from these the brown spores separate themselves, &c. [Did M. Léveillé mention these observations in 1837 ?] Finally, there is a division of the Uredines into three smaller families: 1. dicidinee, with the genera Restelia, Reb. ; Atci- dium, Pers.; Peridermium, Link, and Endophyllum, Lév. 2. Uredinee with Phragmidium, Link ; Puccinia, Pers.; Uredo, Pers.; Podisoma, Link, &c. 3. Ustilaginee with Ustilago, Link; Sporisortum, Khr., &c. Mr. W. Valentine* has laid before the Linnzan Society his observations on the structure and development of the organs of reproduction of Pilularia globulifera: they contain much interesting matter, and it is to be hoped the treatise will soon be published with delineations. M. Alexander Braun+ laid before the Meeting at Frei- berg his observations on the germination of the spores of Marsilea quadrifolia. The fruit of Marsilea he considers as a part of the leaf on the stalk of which it is seated. The nerva- tion [ Berippung] of this fruit-leaf is pinnate, and on the side- ribs are formed the placentz which bear the sporangia, which are of two kinds, and each sorus is covered with a closed in- dusium, &c. According to this view, the formation of fruit in Marsilea is similar to that of the Ferns, and these, as well as the Equisetee and Lycopodia, would then bear their spo- rangia on the leaves, herein differing from the Mosses. * Annals of Nat. Hist. June 1839, p. 260. Linn. Trans., vol. xviil. p. 483. + Flora von 1839, p. 297. Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 467 M. Braun* has also communicated his ideas on the growth of the Ophioglossee, particularly with regard to the cellular body from which the leaves are produced. This body is said to surround the centre of formation, and within it the leaves are produced in regular spiral succession until they unfold, which they do in the fourth year in the case of Oph. vulyatum. The spike of Ophioglossum is axillary. Botrychium does not pos- sess this inclosing cellular body, but the leaves have a sheath. In the Report of 1837+, the observation of M. Martens was mentioned, according to which hybrid forms are found among the Ferns ; the new hybrid which M. Martens has observed, was called by Bory de St. Vincent Gymnogramma Martensii, and was said to be intermediate between G. calomelanos and G. chrysophylla. Mr. J. Riley { of Nottingham has made an excellent reply to this assumption of M. Martens, although he appears not to know that many botanists believe that the anthers of Ferns have been discovered, a subject which was discussed in the former Report, 1836, p.104. Mr. Riley con- siders this supposed hybrid as G. sulphurea, Desv., and gives very sufficient reasons for supposing the formation of hybrids in the Ferns as altogether improbable. Mr. G. Dickie § has published some remarks on the appear- ance of amylum in plants; he notices particularly that in the Lichens; but it was unknown to him that many decisive ob- servations have been already made on this subject. Mr. Dickie assumes that all those parts of Lichens which are coloured blue by iodine are amylum, and he found that even the spo- rangia (thecze) are coloured blue; he compares the sporangium, with the spores which are produced therein, with the structure of the amylum globules; this however is founded on Raspail’s description of the structure of Amylum, which is erroneous. M. G. Korber|| has chosen as the subject for his inaugural dissertation a very circumstantial description of the green cells of the thallus of Lichens ; these are the peculiar cells which Wallroth calls gonidia, and Meyer germinal grains. The author has given the various statements of the two above-mentioned lichenologists with all possible brevity and clearness, has criticized them, and sometimes added his own views, which are grounded on observations of nature. The gonidia were observed in three different stages: 1. as gonidia * Flora von 1839, p. 301. + See Mr. Francis’s translation: London, R. and J. E. Taylor, 1839, p.81. t Reply to M. Martens’s Paper on the Hybridity of Ferns. Proc. of the Bot. Soc. of London, 1839, p. 60. § Annals of Nat. Hist. 1839, p. 165. {| De Gonidiis Lichennm. Diss. Inaug. Berolini, 1839. 2H 2 468 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. synthetica in statu primario seu primitivo, that is, when they were still in the thallus in their natural position ; 2. as gonidia synthetica in statu secundario, 1. e. when they have risen above the surface of the thallus and form soridia, the appearance of which in the different genera is described. Finally, 3. the gonidia are considered as reproductive organs. What Wall- roth and Meyer have observed on this subject is correctly stated to be not satisfactory’; and the author describes his own experiments, which were made with great care in order to observe the germination or development of the gonidia, which however were all unsuccessful. It is to be hoped that M. Korber will continue his observations, for with the help of our improved microscopes, there is doubtless much in this field which remains to be discovered. Mr. Valentine* has communicated to the Linnzan Society his observations on the development of the organs of fructifi- cation of Mosses ; they contain, however, nothing that has not been already made known. Mr. Valentine draws attention to the analogy between the spores of Mosses and the pollen- grains of higher plants. Dr. Stiebel+ has written a treatise on the Oscillatoria which is full of discoveries. According to his observations, the Os- cillatorie are not only animals, but they possess also per- fectly-formed heads; they have a mouth, and when the Ly- sogonium, which Dr. Stiebel has described and delineated, lies on its back, it opens its mouth so that it assumes a triangular form. Out ofthis mouth there comes a rostrum, which moves rapidly in the water and creates a vortex; it moreover pos- sesses muscles, which spring from the lateral margin of the animal. Generally at one end, or in young animals even at both ends, are seen very peculiar tentacula or feelers which execute a motion like that of oars ; they assume different forms for the support of the rostrum and determinate purposes, and exhibit a nerve. In the member which is connected with the head-end is a kind of stomach with black hooks, which are perhaps masticatory organs, and the bag of the stomach is continued on like a rectum. The animal appears to live upon. small monads. Moreover the animal has at both ends pro- jecting shining globules with black dots; these are the eyes, which can be turned round like snails’ eyes, and have a nerve. The Lysogonium did not appear to have two rostra, although * Annals of Nat. Hist. 1839, p.456. Linn. Trans., vol. xviii. p. 499.! + Uber den Bau und das Leben der griinen Oscillatorie Lysogonium teniodes Stieb— Museum Senkenbergianum III. No. I. Frankfurt a M. 1839, pp. 79—90. Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany 469 it has two heads. The propagation takes place in several ways ; sometimes the first joint is as it were vomited (ausgespieen), &c. The description of the muscles of the eyes and feelers, as also of the nervous system, Dr. Stiebel intends to give ata future period. I have perused the above treatise* several times, but cannot determine whether it is meant as a hoax or in earnest—the former appears most probable; for with any microscopical practice the above observations could certainly not have been made with so excellent an instrument as Dr. Stiebel possesses. Notwithstanding the wonderful description, it is quite evident that Lysogonium is only an Oscillatoria whose structure M. Stiebel has altogether mistaken; he did not even see the fine rings which lie between the spores like the so-called intercel- lular substance, and which, when the spores escape, either separate or still adhere to each other. These rings however have led Dr. Stiebel quite astray, even the eyes have arisen out of them. What other philosophers have considered as the head of Oscillatorie Dr. Stiebel has not seen, for in Lysogo- nium, which appears to be Oscillatoria limosa, there is nothing of the kind. In the Report for 1835 I have already mentioned the genus Chionyphe which M. Thienemann has observed in granular snow. We have now a full description of those interest- ing plants, which must be classed with the Alge, but de- cidedly belong to different generat. ‘Three species are de- scribed ; namely, Chionyphe micans, nitens and densa, and the whole genesis of C. nitens is given. The development of this plant is quite similar to that of other jointed Conferve. M. Thienemann observed at first on the snow simple spherical vesicles, which extended lengthwise and became divided in halves by a partition, after a lively movement of previously invisible atoms had taken place in their interior. The halves of the divided vesicle kept increasing, and constantly when the molecular motion again appeared, another division took place, but subsequently only the terminal cell of each side was divided, while the central ones merely extended themselves. Finally, a lively molecular motion arises in these terminal cells; the atoms enlarge and appear like vesicles which cause the terminal cell to swell, so that when ripe it forms a head filled with germinal globules. I must remark, that the for- mation of the partitions during the above-mentioned molecular motion, as well as the production of the spores by the enlarge- * The figures are very beautifully executed, and can scarcely be alto- gether imaginative.—Ep. + Uber ein neues Geschlecht von Schneepflanzen Chionyphe.—Nov. Act. Acad. ¢c. L, C. vol. xix. part 1. pp. 20—26. 470 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. ment of the atoms in the terminal cells, does not agree with previous observations made on this subject, and that a repe- tition of them is therefore necessary. M. Morren* has also observed infusoria in the interior of the bags or tubes of Vaucheria clavata; it was Rotifer vul- garis, and he therefore believes that the animal formations which M. Unger had also seen in this plant, may also have belonged to the same animal. I may here remark, that the appearance of animals in the interior of the Vaucherie@ was first observed by Vaucher; they were the Cyclops Lupula, Mill. ; and in 1834 M. Wimmer observed living infusoria in Vaucheria, which, from the short description, appear to have been Radiata ; even the eggs of this animal were observed. How these animals got into the interior of the Vaucherie has not been observed by any one: indeed M. Morren asserts that his plants were not at all injured ; there were no openings in them through which the animal could enter. M. Morren observed the lively motion of the Rotifer in the interior; he saw how it ran along the sides, pushing the green matter away from it, &c.; he saw the deposition of eggs and the in- crease of the animals, and it appeared to him that they then descended in the tubes and remained in the new mass, where they cause, like parasitic bodies, those excrescences on the sides of the Vaucheria, just in the same manner as insects produce the gall-nuts. Once M. Morren opened the Vaucheria and let the animal come out, but it tried to return into its old prison. M. Wimmer fF has continued his observations on the above subject as well as on the development of the spores of Vau- cheria clavata, and will shortly publish his results. In the Carlsbad Almanac for the past year there is a paper by M. Corda:—“ Observations sur les Kuastrées et les Cosmariées.” The greater part is full of violent replies to the numerous attacks which Ehrenberg has made on M. Corda in his large work on Infusoria{. M. Corda is much dissatisfied with the manner in which his systematic labours, his accurate observations, and his accurate drawings, as he denominates them, have been treated by M. Ehrenberg ; and he endeavours * De l’existence des Infusoires dans les plantes.—Bullet. de l’Acad. R. de Bruxelles, VI. No.4. Ann. Nat. Hist. vol. vi. p. 344. + Jahresbericht der schlesischen Gesellschaft fiir vaterlindische Kultur, 1839, p. 123. t+ I must here remark that these Euastree and Cosmarieé are not In- fusoria, as M. Ehrenberg also states, but simple dlge, as I have sufficiently proved in my latest work to all those philosophers who are acquainted with the structure of d/gz@. M. Corda up to the winter of 1833 also held them to be plants. Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida. 471 to show that Ehrenberg has been guilty of the greatest arbi- trariness. In the last nine pages we have a view of the ge- nera which M. Corda has made for his family of the Euastree and Cosmariee ; and all botanists who have occupied them- selves with observations on this subject, will be somewhat surprised at the by no means small number. [To be continued. ] XLVIII.—Descriptions of new or little known Arachnida. By Mr. Apam Wuirte; Assistant in the Zoological Depart- ment of the British Museum. Havine been favoured by Mr. Darwin with the whole of the extensive collection of Arachnida, made by him on the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle, I intend describing them occasionally in this journal, as well as several others from Van Diemen’s Land, collected by Mr. Gunn. From Mr. Bracy Clarke I have received a collection of spiders made by him in Switzer- land during his travels and residence there in 1798, along with MS. notes drawn up at the time; Mr. Swainson, before setting out for New Zealand, also kindly gave me a bottle of spiders from St. Vincent’s, collected by the late Lansdowne Guilding. They are all preserved in spirits of wine, as spiders should always be if possible, and, to some of Mr. Darwin’s, notes are occasionally added, which I have that gentleman’s permission to extract from his copious manuscript journal *. I describe them without any systematic order, but having necessarily numbered each species, intend afterwards giving a classified index: the descriptions are in many instances prolix, and I have in most cases given the generic character of each species. I have done this because, at present, I am unwilling to propose new names if I can possibly refer the species I describe to any of the established genera. I need hardly say, that in spiders the colours are so fugitive, that unless notes or even drawings are taken from live speci- mens, but little dependence is to be placed on the colours assigned in descriptions taken from the best-preserved speci- mens}. Travellers should be particular in doing this, as well as in taking notes of their habits, whether land or aquatic; whether they hunt for their prey by running after it—jump- ing upon it—or whether they conceal themselves in holes, * These notes, there is no use saying, were always made amid the hurry and bustle of a campaign in which annulese animals formed but a small part of the subjects of research. I prefer giving them as I find them, as there is a freshness about them which would be rubbed off were I to attempt to improve them. + For an example, see the first description (Linyphia argyrobupta). 4479 Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida. tubes, or cells made by themselves, and should also describe the nature of these abodes when possible; whether they wander about without any fixed residence, walking or running sideways; whether they make a web or threads for entrapping their prey, or whether they are sedentary, constructing close webs, or extending them with regular geometric accuracy or in irregular large meshes*. Spiders are frequently found in a very “perfect state in several of the nests of the fossorial Tlymenoptera. Mr. Abbot mentions, in the notes accompany- ing his unpublished drawings of Georgian Annulosa, that Pelopai are the best spider-collectors he ever met with, and save the arachnologist a great deal of trouble, as he has fre- quently found, in the nests of these insects, species he has been unable to meet with elsewhere,—the specimens in the most beautiful condition, as the Spider-wasps do not kill, but in some way paralyse with their stings the destined food of their young; and were British arachnologists to look into the nests of our native Pompili, “rare captures” might often be made. As the note alluded to is very interesting, I transcribe it here verbaiim from the original in the British Museum. Those who have consulted Walckenaer’s first volume, and know how much science is indebted to Abbot for his discoveries of new species of Arachnida, will excuse its length. Drury (IIL. 1. pp- 105, 106) and Darwin (Journal of Researches, p. 40) mention similar instances. “ Sphea lunata, Fab. (Pelopeus lunatus, Fab. Syst. Piez.), called in Savannah Black and Yel- low Mason, and likewise Dirt-daubers: they make oblong cases of clay, which they plaster in layers to roofs, ceilings, and other convenient places; when finished they lay an egg inside at the end, then fill it with spiders and plaster them up. The worm (larva), by the time it eats them all, is full fed, and spins round itself a thin case like gold-beater’s skin, in which it changes into chrysalis ; it begins to build in May and continues all the summer. What is remarkable, they have the art to embalm these spiders alive, or rather enchant them. Upon opening one, the spiders are alive, but unable to walk or make the least resistance, being just able to move a little, sometimes a leg, and they appear plump and (of a) fresh co- lour. I imagine they do this by stinging the spiders: this is a wonderful property and provision of nature to provide the worms with fresh and proper food as long as is needful. Upon putting some of these spiders in a box, they continued plump and fresh several days before they began to alter. One * Remarks of this kind or of a similar nature would often prove ex- tremely interesting, as the Baron Walckenaer has shown that in most cases the family may be ascertained by the habit, and vice versd the habit by the family. Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida. 473 fly continues to build several cells alongside and upon each other: they destroy an amazing number of spiders ; they com- monly put all, or the most part of one particular species toge- ther in one cell, many of them of very rare species, and such I imagine must live chiefly on the tops of branches of the loftiest trees, as I could never afterwards meet with these spe- cimens of spiders. Upon opening several of these cases at once, it affords (as you may judge) a most curious and pleasing sight—such a large number of spiders of the most beautiful colours and rarest species. Could it be possible still to con- tinue to preserve them in their beauty and freshness, they would make a wonderful collection of natural history.” It is much to be desired that the other volumes of BaronWalcke- naer’s elaborate work were published*. I may add, that spe- cimens of all the species here described, unless otherwise in- timated, will be found in the collection of the British Mu- seum, and that I have made figures of most of them, which I intend to publish hereafter. 1. Linyphia (Leucauge) argyrobapta, n.s. Brownish yellow; chelicera darker, at end blackish brown; claws black. Abdomen silvery, with five brownish black (when alive red) longitudinal lines all meeting at the end, the middle one alone taking its origin from the base, and having a lineolet of the same colour extended nearly to the lateral black line, and two small approximating parallel lines directed backwards, ari- sing from about the middle, and extending to the irregular line on each of its sides; the end of the abdomen, where all the lines meet, is brownish black, and there are two distinct silvery spots; the body beneath is brownish black, with a whitish line on each side, and a dot beneath it. Chelicera vertical, oblong, cylindrical, shining; first joint with one or two teeth at end, upon which the long hooked claw closes inwards; this claw is straight at the base and then hooked. Eyes eight, on two transverse lines ; four placed in the middle, the two posterior further apart; the side eyes of last lines are in airs. Maxillec dilated at end, the outside with a few hairs. Palpi slender ; fifth joint as long as second, ending apparently in a claw, and hairy. Mentum small, not very distinct from the heart-shaped sternum. Cephalothorax depressed, narrowed in front, dilated on the side, sinuated behind, with a deep impression beyond the middle, in front of which are two impressed lines directed sideways, and extending forwards to the base of the narrowed part. * July 2. Since this paper was written the 2nd volume of Walckenaer’s work has been published. 474 Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida. Abdomen oblong, smooth, or, at most, only shagreened, with four distinct spinnerets. Legs, at least first two pairs, very long. Ourspecimen, in this respect, was much mutilated: in Mr. Darwin’s MSS. I find that the first pair of legs is much the longest, then the second and fourth, and that the third is shortest. ‘“Web very regular, nearly horizontal, with concentric circles ; beneath, but sometimes above, the concentric web, there is an irregular or thin tissue of network; the animal rests in the centre, on the inferior surface: abdomen brilliant; the red co- lour like a ruby with a bright light behind.” ‘The subgeneric name is one proposed for it in Mr. Darwin’s MSS.—Brit. Mus. Hab. near Rio de Janeiro. May 1832. Charles Darwin, Esq., F.R.S., etc. 2. Linyphia (?) leucosternon, n.s. Body and sternum shagreened ; the sternum and body above gray- ish white ; body beneath grayish black, spotted with white (there are four principal spots in the middle). Cephalothorax, palpi and legs yellowish, the joints of the latter darker ; cephalothorax behind margined with whitish ; the sides hairy : claws of chelicera port-wine colour: eyes black. Chelicera short, swollen, smooth, nearly of equal breadth through- out, with a few (8) teeth inside at the end, and armed with a short strong claw folding inwards. Eyes eight, not very unequal in size, arranged in two transverse lines, the first bending outwards and shorter than the second ; the lateral eyes are the closest and oblique; the two central of each line form nearly a square. Maxille somewhat spatulate. Palpi with the second and fifth joints nearly equal, the fifth being somewhat hairy at end, and apparently terminating in a short claw. Mentum semioval. Sternum cordato-sagittate. Cephalothorax narrowed and truncated in front, dilated and nearly as broad as abdomen behind; this is of a long, oval shape, over- lapping the cephalothorax at the base. The legs are long and slender ; first pair the longest, then the second, the third being much shorter than the fourth. Spinnerets distinct. Hab. Brazil, near Rio de Janeiro. C. Darwin, Esq. 3. Epeira (Singa*) leucogramma, n. s. Cephalothorax ferruginous; space about the eyes dark brown; body and legs grayish brown, darkest on the sides of the body ; body above with three white longitudinal lines proceeding from the base and terminating just before the tip; the middle one * A subgenus founded by Koch, with the beautiful European Epeira Herii of Hahn as the first species. (Uebers. des Arachnidensyst. p. 6.) Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida. 475 somewhat interrupted ; all three are margined with black, which is deepest (thickest) at base; beneath with two abbreviated, somewhat distant, longitudinal white lines margined with black; legs ringed with black. Chelicera vertical, rather longer than they are broad (at base), smooth, somewhat swollen, armed with an incumbent short claw. ; Eyes eight, arranged transversely in two lines; the first very short, containing two eyes; the second, with two in the middle, forming nearly a square with those of first line, which square is on a projection of the cephalothorax ; the two lateral eyes are so close together that they seem as one; they are placed some- what behind the middle pair, and are somewhat further re- moved from them than these are from each other. Maxille short, rounded; base giving insertion to palpi, which are weak, and have the fourth and fifth joints nearly equal ; (fifth armed with a minute claw ?). Mentum short, rounded, distinct from the heart-shaped sternum. Legs short; last pair the longest ; third shorter than the first and second, which are nearly equal in length. Cephalothorax longish, narrowed in front, and not much more than half the width of the abdomen, which is of a fine oval shape. Hab. Brazil, near Rio de Janeiro. C. Darwin, Esq. 4. Tetragnatha bicolor, n. s. Legs, cephalothorax and palpi brownish yellow (in some the palpi are dark brown) ; body shagreneed above, griseous, with three or four indistinct brownish lines; a lighter band on the side, be- neath darker; two greenish gray lines run down the middle, parallel to each other till just before the spinnerets, where they somewhat converge ; eyes black. In the male the abdomen is nerved or shagreened with brownish, and is not so distinctly marked beneath ; a brownish line, some- what interrupted, and emitting a few equal, narrow, brown li- neolets directed backwards, runs down the middle. Chelicera large, very prominent, loose, smooth, subcylindrical, as thick at the end as at the base, and only slightly gibbous on the inner edge, which is furnished with a double row of tooth-like processes, upon which the strong and long claw folds inwards ; this claw is more than half the length of the first joint, and at base is straight, and then suddenly bent. Eyes eight, placed on two lunated parallel lines: the two inter- mediate of the first line smallest and closer to each other than they are to the side-eyes of the same line, while the two inter- mediate eyes of the second line are somewhat more distant from each other than they are from the side-eyes of the same line. Maxille oblong, somewhat bent outwards at the end, which makes the outer margin sinuated; the inner margin is clothed with a 476 Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida. line of short thick-set hairs; the maxille approximate by their inner edge. Palpi slender, with the second joint curved, and rather longer than the fourth and fifth, which are nearly equal; the last jomt seems to end in a claw, and is rather hairy : in the male the fifth joint is dilated on its under side; at base there is a smooth, roundish, globular process ; sternum longish heart-shaped, sides some- what irregular. Cephalothorax of a long, slightly depressed oval shape, which is as broad as the abdomen at base. Abdomen long (two-and-a-half times the length of the cephalo- thorax), narrow, subcylindrical ; at base somewhat swollen, the swollen part overlapping the end of the cephalothorax ; at the end it tapers abruptly, being roundish and slightly recurved: it is covered with close and short hairs. Legs slender ; first pair the longest; second as long, if not a little longer than the fourth; the third pair is very short, half the length of the second; one of the joints is somewhat swollen and curved. Hab. Van Diemen’s Land. R. Gunn, Esq. Walckenaer figures two species, argentea and zorilla, both with a longish oval body. Guérim (Encycl. Méth. x. sub voce) alludes to two or three other species of this genus, from Africa and America, and Koch describes two others in his ‘ Uebersicht,’ (p. 5) ; but this is, I believe, the first species described as coming from Van Diemen’s Land. As will be seen in the description, there are some characters which would constitute it, at least, another section of Latreille’s genus, if not a subgenus. 5. Eripus heterogaster, Walck. Thomisus heterogaster, Latr. Guérin, Iconogr. Arachn. pl. I. fig. 4. «« Evidently, by its structure and habits on the leaf of a tree, this species is a Laterigrade ; it differs, however, most singularly from that tribe, and is, I think, a new genus. «« Anterior eyes red; maxilla rounded, inclined; mentum thinly arrow-shaped ; chelicera powerful, with large aperture for poison ; abdomen encrusted with five conical peaks; thorax with one small one ; crotchets to tarsi very strong. “Colour snow-white, except tarsi and half of leg bright yellow ; the tops of the abdominal points and line of eyes black : it must, I think, be new. Taken in the thick forests near Rio de Janeiro, May 1832.” Darwin’s MSS. Salticus (Homalattus*) pustulatus, n. s. Upper side black, with greenish reflections. Eyes eight, on short elevations of thorax ; may be considered as placed on three lines, two of which are approximate, the third * Homalattus, a new subgenus, now proposed for the first time ; the legs are unfortunately destroyed. Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. 477 being distant ; the first line, which is somewhat bent, contains four eyes, placed on the front margin of the cephalothorax at nearly equal distances from each other; the two intermediate eyes are much the largest. ‘The second line contains two very minute eyes, somewhat removed from the edge of the thorax ; they are placed rather nearer the outer eye of the first line than the outer is to the intermediate; the third line contains two eyes, one on each side the margin of the thorax, the space be- tween the outer eye and the first line being equal to the distance between the outer eyes of the first line. Cephalothorax flat, transverse, not so wide as the body, covered like it with papillz. Abdomen as broad as long; in front straightish ; behind somewhat pointed, the sides rounded; it is flat and compressed, and somewhat convex above. Hab. Sierra Leone. Rev. D. F. Morgan.—Brit. Mus. Pholcus geniculatus, n. s. Body above yellowish, with at least twelve blackish brown spots, eight in the centre, arranged in pairs, and decreasing in size as they approach the apex: sternum and broad line down the centre of body: beneath blackish brown ;: legs reddish yellow ; at the first jomts ringed with blackish and pale whitish yellow; last joint pale, without two blackish rings. Maxille of a long triangular shape, and almost meeting over the mentum; the palpi proceed from the nearly right angle at base, and have the terminal joint much shorter than the fourth and second, which are almost equal in length. The mentum seems somewhat square. Cephalothorax nearly circular, rather broader than long, somewhat truncated behind, and deeply impressed in middle ; it is as wide as the longish oval abdomen: legs very long and slender, nearly smooth, except last joint; first longest ; third shorter than second and fourth, which are nearly equal. Hab. Brazil, near Rio de Janeiro. C. Darwin, Esq. XLIX.—Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. By Wm. Tuomp- son, Esq., Vice-Pres. Natural History Society of Belfast. OF the few vertebrate animals treated of in the present com- munication, one only can be announced with the certainty that is desirable, as Irish: the others are noticed to induce further attention to them, and at the same time to enable any one interested in the subject to form his own opinion respect- ing the propriety of their introduction, even with doubt, into the Fauna. Mammalia. Mus messorius, Shaw? Harvest Mouse. May 12, 1838.—Mr. Adams, gamekeeper at Shane’s Castle Park (co. Antrim), mentioned 478 Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. to me what he had heard of a remarkably small kind of mouse and its nest ; the description of which would apply to this species. The nest was built nearly as high from the ground as the narrator’s knees, and suspended between stalks of wheat, in a field of this grain : the old animals scarcely bent the stalks of wheat when running up them. The observer, a schoolmaster and farmer, resident within a mile of Shane’s Castle, related the above to Mr. Adams as an extra- ordinary fact which had come under his notice last autumn. AVES. Falco Groenlandicus, Linn., Hancock. Greenland Falcon. Ina letter from John Vandeleur Stewart, Esq., dated Rockhill, Letter- kenny, Feb. 3, 1837, I was favoured with a minute description of a bird in his collection, believed to be an Iceland Falcon. At the meeting of the British Association held at Newcastle in 1838, Mr. John Hancock of that town read a paper (admirably illustrated by spe- cimens in various states of plumage) with the view to show that the Iceland and Greenland Falcons are distinct species. ‘This was sub- sequently published in the second volume of the ‘ Annals of Natural History.’ On referring to the description of Mr. Stewart’s bird, I felt certain that, according to Mr. Hancock’s views, it must be the F.. Groenlandicus, and having submitted the description to this gen- tleman, I had the satisfaction of receiving his testimony to the same effect. Pyrrhula Enucleator, Temm.? Pine Bullfinch. In the manuscript journal of that eminent naturalist, John Templeton, Esq., is the fol- lowing note.—‘‘ December 20, 1819. Yesterday heard from Mr. Montgomery of Belfast [a discriminating ornithologist], that Mr. Bradford had received a specimen of the Lovia Enucleator which was shot at the Cave-hill [vicinity of Belfast], and on showing the figure in the Naturalist’s Miscellany, he recognised it to be the bird.” Coracias garrula, Linn.? Roller. For some years I have hada note from Mr. R. Ball to the effect that—In the middle of September 1831, when he was walking through the demesne at Carton—the seat of the Duke of Leinster—his attention was attracted by a bird pursued by a great number of Rooks, which, instead of flying off to avoid them, continued for a considerable time, or so long as he had patience to remain, to dash in amongst them apparently for the sake only of annoyance. From the size, brilliant plumage, and singular flight of this bird, my friend was satisfied of its being a Roller. Mr. Walker of Granby Row, Dublin, states that one of these birds, shot in the county of Sligo some years ago, was preserved for a relative of his who resides there. Another Roller has been mentioned to me as obtained in the South of Ireland some years since, but as yet no example of the bird unquestionably killed in this island, has to my knowledge come under the inspection of the naturalist. AMPHIBIA. Lissotriton palmipes, Bell? Palmated Smooth-Newt. On ques- tioning Mr. William McCalla of Roundstone, Connemara (a most Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. 479 intelligent collector of objects of natural history), respecting the spe- cies of Newts observed by him, he replied—‘“‘ I am positive of there being two species of Triton in this country, one of which is the 7. punctatus of Jenyns’s ‘ Manual,’ and the rarer with us; the more common species is by far larger and of a richer colour ; it is nearly double the size of T. punctatus; the crest is far larger and is not notched ; the feet are webbed. ‘To convince you that I have not confounded the young and adult of the same species, I may state that I observed them in the breeding season, and met with females of both species.” A fair inference from these remarks, I think, is that Lissotriton palmipes is the animal alluded to. My correspond- ent had not seen Mr. Bell’s work on British Reptiles. Pisces. Scomber maculatus, Couch? Spanish Mackerel. Mr. McCalla having mentioned the occurrence of this fish on the coast of Conne- mara, replied to my queries as follows :—‘‘ The fish which I consi- der to be this, is found with the Mackerel, and, in some seasons, not uncommonly. It is known by the name of Spanish Mackerel, which was no doubt first applied to it here by the Coast Guard, many of whom have been in the navy. I have not seen any specimens of S. maculatus this year (1840), but on carefully looking to the charac- ters given by Couch (Jenyns’s ‘ Manual’) am of opinion that it is the above species. I am quite positive that we have two species of Scomber on this coast. Curanz trachurus has been scarce here this ear. a. Silurus Glanis, Linn.? Sly Silurus. That this species has in a single instance been taken in Ireland I am disposed to believe on the following testimony. On inquiry (October, 1840) of William Blair, who has for many years been fisherman, etc. at Florence Court, whe- ther he had ever met with any rare fish, he described an extraordi- nary one, of which he could never learn the name, that he took twelve or thirteen years ago in a tributary of the Shannon, near its source, and about three miles above Lough Allen. His description was so graphic and particular, that Lord Enniskillen on hearing it immediately suggested its applicability to the Si/urus, and on Yar- rell’s figure being shown to the intelligent captor of the specimen, he at once identified it as in all respects representing his fish, except in the head and mouth not being large enough. Professor Agassiz, who was present, on being appealed to, stated, that these parts were certainly not represented of sufficient size in the figure. The fish was seen struggling in a pool in the river after a flood, and ‘‘ with the long worm-like feelers from its mouth ;” and its general appearance was luoked upon asso hideous that the persons who first saw it were afraid to touch it. The specimen was at least 24 feet in length, and 8 or 9 lbs. in weight. Although unfortunately ‘lost to science,” it, for two or three years, or until the skeleton fell to pieces, adorned a bush near the scene of its death. The species was not known as an inhabitant of any of the neighbouring waters by the persons of the district. 480 Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. The distribution of the Silurus Glanis on the continent of Europe is somewhat anomalous, as I learn from M. Agassiz. In Central Europe it is found in the lakes of Neuchatel, Bienne, and Morat only :—in no other lakes or rivers connected with the Rhine does it occur. It inhabits the rivers flowing into the Baltic and Black Sea. Mo.uvsca. Tritonia bifida, Flem., Brit. Anim. Doris bifida, Mont., Linn. Trans., vol. xi. p. 198. t. 14. f. 8. Au- gust 25, 1840.—An individual of this species taken by Mr. Getty and Mr. Hyndman, when dredging in Belfast Bay, was brought to me. It agrees critically with Montagu’s description, except in the following points. ‘There are just 12 appendages on each side, three of which are larger than the rest, but placed at un- equal distances from each other on both sides, and not opposite as shown in Montagu’s figure. ‘The colour is better defined than in the figure; the marginal line, whence the appendages issue, is strongly marked and reddish, as they likewise are ; foot plain flesh-colour. The animal is extremely agile, and planaria-like is one mo- ment twice the length it is the next; it often moves about with the foot upwards, and in its motions several times had the long tail thrown quite under the head. Melibea fragilis, Forbes, Malacologia Monensis, p. 4. pl. 1. fig. 4. July 20, 1840. Three examples of this species were taken on Antennularia antennina, dredged in Clew Bay (co. Mayo), by Mr. R. Ball, Mr. Forbes, and Mr. Hyndman. Kolidia Zetiandica, Forbes, Atheneum, 1839, p.647. July 29,1840. This species was taken by Mr. Forbes and myself between tide- marks at Lahinch, county Clare. Euplocamus pulcher. (See Annals Nat. Hist., vol. v. p. 91. note.) Tergipes pulcher, Johnston, Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. vii. p. 490. f. 59. Triopa claviger, Johnston, Annals Nat. Hist., vol.i. p. 124. At the same time with the Holidia Zetlandica, an individual of this spe- cies occurred to us. Chiton levigatus. Obtained in Strangford Lough by Mr. Hyndman and myself. On oysters brought to Belfast market from Car- lingford and Greencastle (co. Londonderry), W. T.; Bangor, co. Down, Mr. R. Patterson. «« Pleurobranchus plumula. Malbay (co. Clare), very rare,’’ W. H. Harvey, Esq. Turritella subtruncata. Turbo subtruncata, Mont., p. 300. t. 10. f. 1. Of this species a single specimen was obtained at Bundoran (co. Donegal), in 1840, by Mrs. Hancock. Rissoa calathisca. Among shell-sand which I obtained at Bantry Bay in 1834, was an individual of this species. Rissoa rupestris, Forbes, Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. v. p. 107. pl. 2. f. 13. Dublin coast, T. W. Warren, Esq.; North-east coast, Mr. Hyndman and W. T. Not rare. Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. 481 Lacuna rufa. Belfast and Strangford Loughs, Mr. Hyndman and W.T. Rare. Brocus striatus, Brown’s Illus., pl. 1. f. 18. Among shell-sand brought from Bantry Bay in 1834, W. T. Lima subauriculata. 'Two odd valves dredged in Strangford Lough, in Aug. 1837, by Mr. Hyndman and W. T. Modiola tulipa, Lam. A shell so named by Mr. Forbes was obtained in Belfast Bay by Mr. Hyndman. Gibbsii, Leach. Obtained by dredging, etc. in Clew Bay (co. Mayo) during an excursion made to the west of Ireland in July 1840, by Mr. R. Ball, Mr. E. Forbes, Mr. Hyndman, and my- self. Crenella decussata. Mytilus decussatus, Laskey, Wern. Mem., vol. i. p. 394. pl. 8. f. 17. A few odd valves dredged in Strangford Lough in Aug. 1837, by Mr. Hyndman and W. T. Captain Brown has applied the name of Crenella elliptica to this species. Mactra cinerea, Mont. Magilligan and Portmarnock, Mr. Hynd- man. elliptica, Brown. Portmarnock, W. T. Donaz rubra, Mont. In shell-sand from Portmarnock. Bundoran, Mrs. Hancock. ZooPpuHyTa. Hydra viridis, Linn. Obtained at Bandon (co. Cork) by Mr. Geo. J. Allman. Actinia viduata, Mull., Zool. Dan. Observed between tide-marks at Lahinch (co. Clare) by Mr. Forbes and myself. We consider it distinct in species from A. mesembryanthemum. Anthea cereus, Johnst. Gertner, Phil. Trans., vol. lil. p. 78. t. 1. f.1. In September 1835, I made a note of this species as being the most common Actinia at Ballyhome Bay (co. Down), where it was gregarious, forming in some places a continuous fringe round large rock-pools and stones, exposed to view at low water. In such quantity it is not now to be seen there, having become gradually scarcer since the period mentioned. In Dublin Bay and on the western coast this species likewise prevails. It is commonly of a dull ash-colour throughout, but wherever I have remarked it, some few individuals were to be found of a green colour, with the tentacula partially or wholly red. The A. cereus is doubtless one of the species mentioned under another name by Mr. Templeton as found at Ballyhome Bay (Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. ix. p. 303.), but in uncer- tainty which of his should be referred to, I have thought it better to notice the subject again. Cellepora ramulosa, Linn. Johnst., Brit. Zoop., p. 274. pl. 32. f. 4, 5. Obtained at Youghal by Miss Ball; Portmarnock, 1835, Weak. Cliona celata, Grant. ‘In perforations of the shell of the oyster (Ostrea edulis)” taken in Belfast Bay and elsewhere on the north-east coast, W. T. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. get 482 Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. ANNELIDA. Nemertes gracilis, Johnst., Mag. Zool. and Bot., vol. i. p. 534. pl. 17. f. 1. Nov. 12, 1840. I received a specimen of this worm taken at Cultra, Belfast Bay. It is larger than Dr. Johnston’s, but agrees in every character with his description and figure. lactiflorea, Johnst., Mag. Z. and B., vol. 1. 585. pl. 17. f.2. With the last species, two examples of this were pro- cured. The eyes are as described by Dr. Johnston, and conse- quently the worm would seem to be distinct from Planaria ro- sea, Mull. My specimens when extended are each about two inches in length and of a yellowish flesh colour. ‘The characters are all as given by Dr. Johnston. Phylline Hippoglossi, Lam. Johnst., Annals Nat. Hist. vol. i. 431. pl. 15. f. 1—8. Hirudo Hippoglossi, Mull., Zool. Dan., vol. 11. p. 18. t. 54. For some years past this species has commonly occurred to me on Halibut (Hippoglossus vulgaris) brought to Belfast market, and captured on the coasts of Down and Antrim. Carinella trilineata, Lined Worm. Johnst., Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. vi. Gordius annulatus, Mont., Linn. Trans., vol. vii. p. 74. This beau- tiful worm has been dredged by Mr. Hyndman and myself on different occasions in Strangford Lough and in the open sea at Ballywalter on the Down coast: in every instance it was free. Belfast Bay, Dr. Drummond. Glossipora tuberculata, Johnson (J. R.). Neighbourhood of Cole- raine, Mr. James Bryce, jun. CRUSTACEA. Pisa tetraodon, Leach, Mal. Brit., pl. 20. Mr. R. Ball has in his ca- binet a specimen found at Roundstone by Mr. McCalla. This species is given in Mr. Templeton’s catalogue of Irish Crustacea, but I have reason to believe by mistake. Ebalia Cranchii, Leach, Malac., tab. 25. f. 7—11. July 1840. A single specimen dredged in Roundstone Bay, Connemara, by Mr. R. Ball and Mr. Forbes. Several since obtained by Mr. Ball, thrown on shore at Portmarnock by a storm. Inachus leptochirus, Leach, Malac., tab. 22. B. A specimen dredged in Clifden Bay, Connemara, about the same time with the last. Belfast Bay, Mr. R. Patterson. Athanas nitescens, Leach, Malac., t. 44. Cancer nitescens, Mont. M.S. A specimen taken between tide-marks at Lahinch, co. Clare, Mr. Forbes and W. T. Aiga tridens, Leach. An Aiga agreeing in the few characters as- signed to this species by Dr. Leach is in my collection. It was taken alive on a cod-fish in Belfast market. Mr. A. H. Hassall on some new Irish Zoophytes. 483 L.—Description of two new Genera of Irish Zoophytes*. By Arruur Hitt Hassaur, Esq., Corresponding Member of the Natural History Society of Dublin. Order ZOOPHYTA ASCIDIOIDA. Family ALCYONIDUL2. Genus Cycioum. Character.—Polypidom fleshy, encrusting, covered with numerous imperforate papillz : polypi ascidian; ova in clusters. Cycloum papillosum.—Polypi with eighteen tentacula disposed in the form of a bell. Tuis species is almost invariably found investing the frond of Fucus serratus, over the surface of which it spreads in patches of from one to two inches in extent, more frequently of one, and seldom exceeding two inches. The crust is fleshy, and rather thick: it is covered with numerous papille very closely set together. The polypi do not issue from these pa- pill, which are imperforate, but from larger eminences of irregular form and size, in the centre of which a puckered depression is seen. The polypi have eighteen tentacula, de- scribing a cup or bell. The ova he in clusters, each cluster containing six or seven ova arranged in a circle. The clusters are irregularly scattered through the pelypidom, and each is inclosed in a space somewhat larger than is sufficient to con- tain it, the remainder of the space being occupied by a fluid in which numerous small particles are seen which are kept in constant action by the motion of the cilia on the ova. Each ovum is of a circular form, but is depressed, one side more so than the other: round its edge a fringe of cilia is apparent ; these may be seen in motion long before the ova are ready for becoming disengaged. I have discovered in this, as well as in the succeeding and some other genera, a body of a very pe- culiar nature, but concerning the uses of which I can at pre- sent only hazard some conjectures. It is, in this species, and in Alcyonidium gelatinosum and hirsutum, in which I have also met with it, of an oblong form, and composed of a trans- parent matter, in which numerous small dark brown granules, circular in shape and uot unlike ova, are imbedded. [| at first imagined that they were nothing more than particles of lime lodged in a soft jelly-like substance, but this opinion was dis- proved by the application of hydrochloric acid, which did not cause effervescence. These bodies are far more numerous than the ova, and are not more than one-tenth their size. The mest probable conjecture which I have been able to form as to * Communicated to the Dublin Nat. Hist. Society, Feb. 1841. 212 484 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Description of their nature is, that they are organs destined to contain the ova until they have arrived at a certain degree of maturity, in fact, ovaries, and if not ovaries, the ova themselves in a very early stage of their formation. I have been induced to raise this species to a generic rank, principally from the arrangement of the oya in circles, which is, I believe, peculiar to it. Some weeks ago, when at Belfast, Mr. Thompson pointed out this species to my notice, say- ing, at the same time, that he had forwarded it long since to Dr. Johnston as new; its distinctive characters had how- ever been made out by myself long previous to this interview with Mr. Thompson, and reference is made to it in my Cata- logue*. This zoophyte, as well as the succeeding species, exhibits in a very remarkable degree that “ close adhesion to life,” the usual accompaniment of a low organization, which renders this class of animals so patient of injuries which would be fatal to beings of greater complexity of structure. I have on more than one occasion seen the polypidoms of this and the follow- ing species enveloped in a firm coating of ice; on immersion of either of these in sea-water the coating has become dis- solved, and the polypi have protruded their feelers, and have appeared as active as though they had never been exposed to such a very low degree of temperature as would have de- stroyed the life of more highly organized animals. From this it is apparent that their sensibility cannot be very great. Dublin bay, on Fucus serratus ; not uncommon. We now come to the description of the second genus. Order ZOOPHYTA ASCIDIOIDA. Family ALCYONIDULA. Genus SarcocHITuM. Character.—Polypidom encrusting, fleshy, covered with numerous prominences of irregular form and unequal size, from which the po- lypi issue ; ova circular, scattered singly throughout the polypidom ; a dark brown body of a circular form filled with small round granules is apparent in great numbers through the polypidom.—Polypi asci- dian. Sarcochitum polyoum.—Polypi with twenty tentacula. This species is aiso usually found investing Fucus serratus, the frond of which it sometimes covers to the extent of several inches. The crust is thin and fleshy, and covered with nu- merous large eminences of irregular form and unequal size, which exhibit a puckered appearance in the centre, and from * Published in the ‘Annals’ for Nov. 1840, p. 170. two new Genera of Irish Zoophytes. 485 which the polypi issue; these have twenty tentacula. The polypidom, when found on one side of the weed, is generally also present on the reverse side ; and this is somewhat curious, as the crust almost constantly terminates on each side of the weed at some distance from its edge, so that it cannot reach the one side from the other by a continuity of growth. The oya in this species are exceedingly numerous, and vary in colour from white to yellow ; they present much the same form and appearance as those of the preceding genus. If a quantity of the sea-weed, with the zoophyte upon it, be placed in salt-water for a few hours, great numbers of the ova will become liberated, and may plainly be seen with the unassisted eye moving about in almost ceaseless action ; now gliding ra- pidly along the surface of the water, now wheeling round upon their axes; at one time elevating themselves in the fluid, again as rapidly sinking in it:—these elevations and subsidences seeming to depend upon the form of the ovum, which is seen to change with these movements. The facility and rapidity with which these little bodies seem to perform their evolutions is very striking. They may often be seen to run along the water in a straight line for several inches, at a pace which would far outstrip the fleetest Newmarket racer—the relative sizes of the two creatures being taken into consideration ;—and it is not a little curious to observe, that no matter how many ova be moving about in the same space, still they never come in contact, appearing to avoid each other as carefully as though they were possessed of eyes. The thought then occurred to me, that the minute, frail, and delicate ova of these species must have made their way unscathed and uninjured through from twenty to thirty miles of the troubled and stormy ocean, and have fixed themselves to our rocks—the vibratile cilia on their surfaces being mainly instrumental in effecting their transportation. The polypidoms of this and the preceding species are often so mixed up in their distribution upon the same piece of sea- weed, that it requires a practised eye to distinguish them. I have been induced to consider this species as distinct from the genus Alcyonidium, to which it bears a near relation—for the following reasons: 1st. The number of the tentacula, a character which I have found to be constant, it being twenty in this and but sixteen in Alcyonidium; 2nd. This species never rises from the surface of attachment in the form of an independent polypidom; it is invariably encrusting, whereas all the species of the genus Alcyonidium do form elevated polypidoms; and 3rd. There is a difference in the form of the body or organ to which I have referred in the description of 486 Mr. T. C. Eyton’s Notes on Birds. the genus Cyclowm ;—it being circular in this, while it is ob- long in the genus Alcyonidium. I have frequently noticed a species of zoophyte lining the interior of old shells of Buccinum undatum, and covering the under surface of stones, which I consider to be identical with this. If a portion of the polypidom of this species, in a living condition, be suddenly plunged into spirits, an instantaneous protrusion of the polypi takes place, having their feelers ar- ranged, as in life, in the form of a graceful bell. In this state they may be kept, for a time, for the purposes of future ex- amination. The cause of this protrusion is readily explained. The polypes being already contracted within their cells,—on the application of the irritating spirit are compelled to start outwards ;—the only motion of which they are capable when folded up within these cells*. I have, in conclusion, to acknowledge the assistance I re- ceived from the classical attainments of my talented and va- lued friend, G. J. Allman, Esq. of Bandon, in the naming of the genera. LI.— Notes on Birds. By T. C. Eyron, Esq., F.L.S. INO. TH: Merops Melanura, Vig. and Horsf. ToncuE long, poited, but soft at the extremity and without bristles, posteriorly armed with two strong spines on each side, between which there are a few smaller ones. CEsophagus small, of nearly uniform diameter; proventriculus large, nearly globular, and slightly contracted at its entrance into the stomach, which is somewhat oval and slightly muscular, with the epithelium hardened. The intestinal canal was much damaged, but appeared to be of rather large diameter. I could not perceive any ceca: liver large, bilobed, right lobe nearly twice the size of the left. Sternum rather elongated, with a deep keel considerably produced anteriorly, and much rounded on its inferior edge. The posterior margin of the sternum indented on each side with two very deep fissures, the lateral ones deepest, broader posteriorly than anteriorly ; the manubrial process not distinct and prominent, but merged into the keel, which is continued forwards between the coracoids. Os furcatum with the rami much flattened laterally, strong and slightly arched, without any process at the point where it approaches the sternum ; coracoids of moderate length and strength, with a very ~ broad articulation to the sternum. Pelvis very broad ; obturator foramen linear, nearly obliterated ; * Drawings of these two genera have been forwarded by myself to Dr. Johnston, and will, I suppose, appear in his Supplement. Sir P. G. Egerton’s Catalogue of Fossil Fish. 487 ischiadic foramen oval, of moderate size. Cotyloid cavities placed near the centre of the pelvis ; os pubis not continued far downwards, with the extremity inclined upwards and inwards. Scapulars broad, widest near their extremities, which are pointed. The skeleton was too much injured to enable me to make out the numbering of the vertebre with certainty. Remar«s.—In the anatomy of the soft parts, as far as I could make them out from a much damaged specimen, and in the skeleton, a great preponderance is shown in favour of the genus Merops being classed with the Kingfishers, which indeed might be expected from the external structure ; and in those points in which it differs it appears to approach the Humming Birds, a group which I think must also be classed among the fissirostral or volitorial division of birds. The sternum, in having two posterior fissures on each side, agrees with the Kingfishers, but is altogether longer and has a deeper keel in proportion to its length, and the inferior edge of it is more rounded than in that family, in which par- ticulars it appears to approach the Humming Birds. The coracoids and humerus are proportionally shorter, al- though of nearly the same form as among the Alcedinide: these portions of the skeleton are found remarkably short among the Humming Birds. In the structure of the pelvinal bones, the os furcatum, and ribs, Merops agrees precisely with the typical Kingfishers. LII.—A Catalogue of Fossil Fish in the Collections of the KARL oF ENNISKILLEN, F.G.S., &c. and Sir Puitie Grey Egerton, Bart., F.R.S., &c.* GeNvs and Spectres. Formation. Locality. Acanthoderma spinosum ... Black schist...... Engi. Acanthopleurus serratus ... ID or Bean deaceacober Ib. Acanus arcuatus ............ IDX); Sogszoonnewaude Ib. —— oblongus ............06 iD) OF tscienistdanaqus Ib. Acipenser Toliapicus...... London clay ... Sheppy. Acrodus Anningie ......... LDH Sooasaatanboooe Lyme Regis. STAN Aely eoteeele sie estes Grés bigarré ... Deux Ponts. — Gaillardoti ............ Muschelkalk ... Bayreuth. — gibberulus ............ Tuas tae shiasenestons Lyme Regis. —— latus......cccsereeeevee IDYis incep Sqonepeedas alos * This Catalogue has been printed for private distribution by Sir Philip Grey Egerton, to whose kindness we are indebted for permission to insert it. 488 a) a eee eee Fossil Fish in the Collections of Genus and SPECIES. Acrodus Jeiodus TMMINITNUS, vec-aeceaee cece MODIS) sesentseeeieeleistelacls wee eee aeenee Acrolepis aSper .....+.eseeess Sedgwickii .....-...... /AStobates irregularis ...... Amblypterus eupterygius ... lateralis ——— atu ........cccccseecsees Amblyurus macrostomus ... Anenchelum dorsale ......... Glarisianum’...........° —— heteropleurum......... isopleurum ..........+5 latum Aspidorhynchus acutirostris Anglicus ..........2.0+ Comptoni mandibularis Asteracanthus ornatissimus semisulcatus........0006 Asteroptychius ornatus...... Atherina macrocephala...... Aulolepis typuS ........e0 Belonostomus acutus leptosteus .......se00e 1M Brink} ry aassnnaagod soos tenellus eee ee eee Beryx microcephalus — ornatus TACIANS ......eeeeeeseneee seer eee eeneeeee Blochius longirostris Carangopsis dorsalis......... latior Carcharias grosseserratus... —— macrodon —— megalodon ............ megalotis ........0.0000 —— minor POLYZYIUS ............006 PLOCUCHUS) eS eeae sense —— subserratus .........06+ Sere eee eee eeees Formation. Great Oolite Muschelkalk ? ... Witasie cone ceeticnmes Kupfer-schiefer Mag. Limestone London clay Coal formation... Kimmeridge clay Great Oolite Carb. Limestone eee eeeeenee LETS Seenqnaeng0d000 Great Oolite Oolite’ ..c..2..eee- DAaserscsaeeseetes Locality. Stonesfield. Axmouth. Lyme Regis. Mansfeld. Ferry Hill. Sheppy. Lebach. Tb. Ib. Ib. Street. Engi. Ib. Ib. Ib. Ib. Solenhofen. Whitby. Brazil. Solenhofen. Shotover. Stonesfield. Armagh. Monte Bolea. Kent. Whitby. Stonesfield. Solenhofen. Lyme. Kent. Tb. Ib. Monte Boleca. Tb. Ib. Maryland. Ib. Malta. Maryland. Ib. Ib. Malta. Sheppy. the Karl of Enniskillen and Sir P. G. Egerton. Genus and SPECIES. Caturus furcatus .........065 MACTOGUS) son scessscee es ANACTULUN fe 65 sucess sees ——— MAXIMUS .......esceeeee ——— MICTOCHIFUS .......0000- PachyUrus! © s.<-cs-<05 —— pleiodus ............... Ceratodus altus ............ —— gibbus ...........0..ee —— planus ...........0.ee ee Cheiracanthus microlepidotus THINOD Steve soscessacicss Cheirolepis Cummingiz ... Traillii .......2.. ascacees Chimera Agassizii_ ...... aes DreVirOStrisS ...+eeeeeee- G@aleteereccs cocssssenae —— Egertoni .....+sseseees Mantellit ......cccccce+e dO) WE secesecsccascessen Chomatodus cinctus ........- ———— | ESI Gc5ec Neesaeecas —— {runcatus ....... cess ws Chondrosteus acipenserides Cladocyclus Gardneri ...... Lewesiensis .......... +02 LDYD5, Gaodon0d0sc00d Tb. —— MINOY ... ss eeeeeeee eens Purbeck stone... Purbeck. notopterus .........66- Oolite, Snssseecse Solenhofen. —— palliatus ............... Kimmeridge clay Boulogne. punctulatus .........64 CIPS “aaconnecddos Kent. —— semiserratus ......... IVINS Gonanastoaadon: Whitby. serratulus ........+++ ID Sb egcemabocasicboo Barrow. unguiculatus ......... Great Oolite . Stonesfield. the Earl of Enniskillen and Sir P. G. Egerton. 493 Genus and SPECIEs. Formation. Locality. Lepracanthus Colei ......... Coal shale ...... N. Wales. Leptacanthus semistriatus Great Oolite ... Stonesfield. SCIEARUSTE cesceeegeuste es DOo. ca-cesce sce ges Tb. —— tenuispinus ...........+ | BENS Baeececconcus Lyme. Leptolepis Bronnii ......... UNAS eaecets eth acer Lyme. CHUUAHSD ceceseccseccs es DOL sss ceetesoeetes Ib. CONTEACUUS)| .ocsesssce ee Oolite:.. cites. Solenhofen. (HS: - Secaacsesdcasec WAS ess cectcecs es lb. —— filipennis ............. Ss IVES oebeastannococe Street. ICTIORTI ccc tec cece sce se A Ooliter..c2ittcees Solenhofen. WAS eceeccssacstcsseeees DGanst-cactscccesed Eichstadt. paucispondylus ,..... Green sand ...... Kelheim. —— polyspondylus ,,....... OMNES coccossoocee Solenhofen. TESTS RY Saendacasdacosnce Green sand ,...,. Kelheim. sprattiformis ......... Opliters--ceocs- +s Solenhofen, Sa VOTE Ses ssiepais tes nee Green sand ...... Kelheim. Leuciscus gracilis .,.......... Tertiary beds ... Wurtemburg. VAGUSCUIUS) .icessesrccs On rsteecctcesesste (ningen. HATER) eooocansondasoe Papier-kohl ...... Rhine. —— (€ningensis ............ Tertiary beds .., (Eningen. PAPYTACEUS .......eee0 Papier-kohl...... Rhine. Lichia prisca .........ssseeeees EOcene........0000 Monte Bolea. Macropoma Egertoni ...... Galiensseess=esese> Speeton. Manteliic...cccesseserss Chalks isscshss sees Sussex. Macrosemius brevirostris ... Great Oolite ... Stonesfield. Mallotus villosus ........+. he Recent beds ....., Greenland. Megalichthys Hibberti...... Coal shale ...... Burdie House. Megalops priscus ......+. ete London clay...... Sheppy. Microdon hexagonus ...... Oolites. 22522823 Solenhofen. TACUEGUSE Nee sec cce sees cee Purbeck stone... Purbeck. Mnugil princeps .......+..+++++ Tertiary beds ... Aix. Myliobates angustus......... London clay..... . Sheppy. PYLAUUS sp ennes sees ee=s ‘ IMG r acdocsooaaseped Ib. ——marginalis ............ ID aondedscoanecen Ib. —— MITIANS 20... ...cceecceece DOs .ccevcvesvecses Tb. Myliobates Stokesii ......... —— StudeM ........cccscecece Molasse ......... Soleure. — subarcuatus ....,....... London clay...... Sheppy. Toliapicus.............4+ IDG» ecssconsconcoce Ib. aa Seer COLOOUE: Dyeeeees (Orie crecnoonnnnen Norfolk. Myriacanthus paradoxus ... IWR ecedeoecoucanos Lyme. —— T€tIOFSUS ........e000e0e DOs Seeccweecets oe Tb. Mpyripristis homopterygius OCCIC: ose sce - Monte Bolca. leptacanthus......... we DOs icesdcavassdes . Ib. 494 Fossil Fish in the Collections of Genus and SPECIES. Formation. Locality. Nemacanthus brevispinus... Great Oolite... Stonesfield. HlifeTsspeceatescoscaeenee Muschelkalk ? ... Aust. Nemopteryx crassus ........- Black schist...... Engi. CLONGAatUS ......c.cereeoe [DOs gacshannceskber Ib. : [do. Notagogus Pentlandi......... Jura Limestone Torre d’Orlan- Nothosemus octostychius... WAS i cceecdavene ces Lyme. Notidanus microdon......... Chalkayteesescetsc Kent. primigenius ............ Molasse Wancsssent Soleure. Odontaspis rhaphiodon...... Chalk.