bye te? th
ry ney)
rr aL
- He A Ke
eat
we
ye
Nias
yee
Mh yeti
TOON Si
reatizees
ripe
Rete
Pee e Rata
‘ Rina
Ree te ms set ieee
oe 5}
‘
hse Sea te
we
“aby Se
Ly
4e 4
water aes
farehate
sty
y 53 one %s
DF haf Se Pmeaerians
tae
cite Ae
A AA oF ‘|
a 4 i is
’
a ih
al
: *
.
i}
hi
.
7.
¥
*
i
iy
'
7
*
‘ ;
M oy
aati a he
lal
i ah ;
hi ;
a |
Pn ai : 4 DA - oe els @
ts RADE }
' { : e
es
Th ‘
nun
THE ANNALS
AND
MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY,
INCLUDING
ZOOLOGY, BOTANY, ann GEOLOGY.
(BEING A CONTINUATION OF THE ‘ MAGAZINE OF BOTANY AND ZOOLOGY,’ AND OF
LOUDON AND CHARLESWORTH'S ‘MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. )
CONDUCTED BY
Sir W. JARDINE, Bart.—P. J. SELBY, Esa.,
Dr. JOHNSTON,
DAVID DON, KEsea., Pror. Bor. Kine’s Couu, Lonp.,
AND
RICHARD TAYLOR, F.L.S.
eee eee
VOE.- VIE: Bs ig
LLLIELELELELEL_OOEOEOEOEEOES
LONDON:
PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY R. AND J. E. TAYLOR.
SOLD BY S. HIGHLEY; SIMPKIN AND MARSHALL; SHERWOOD AND CO.: W. woop,
TAVISTOCK STREET; BAILLIERE, REGENT STREET, AND PARIS:
LIZARS, AND MACLACHLAN AND STEWART, EDINBURGH:
CURRY, DUBLIN: AND ASHER, BERLIN.
1841.
‘‘Omnes res create sunt divine sapientiz et potentiz testes, divitiz felicitatis
humane: exharum usu bonitas Creatoris; ex pulchritudine sapientia Domini; ex
ceconomia in conservatione, proportione, renovatione, potentia majestatis elucet.
Earum itaque indagatio ab hominibus sibi relictis semper estimata; a vere eruditis
et sapientibus semper exculta; male doctis et barbaris semper inimica fuit.”—
LINN.
CONTENTS OF VOL. VII.
NUMBER XLI.
Page
I. Considerations respecting Spur-shaped Nectaries, and those of the :
Aquilegia vulgaris in particular. By M. Cu. Morren, Professor in
ordinary at the University of Liége, Member of the Royal Academy of
PemeRBEN ee Core CVVIP HSENLG.)) «canccsscacener soavesonsspssedoteuoncsseaseetee 1
IT. On the Fungi of the Neighbourhood of Bristol. By Mr. H. O.
BORHIERRERNG Goniec coe quo ce suas soievoie ives ncn anelqnennaiyasiea sare aurea nas sedeaewase 17
III. Description of Four Bats taken in Cuba, By Dr. Grunptacu 19
IV. Horz Zoologice. By Sir W. Jarpine, Bart. :—
Remarks on the Structure and Habits of Lepidosiren annec-
TELS sconpnacatccadoocoacd asss0conpoadadooosdNcOsNOSoNSaSIsDETORCGOseS 21
V. Commentary on Mr. G. R. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds,’ 1840. By
Pee STRICKLAND, Bisg., MOA G52, Cpa wana ca oate antdeien seis oueawereos 26
VI. Mr. Suuckarp on his falsely alleged participation in Mr. Swain-
Ronaiviews of Natural Arrangement © ........ccccssscscserccocrcsscecrecsee 41
VII. Excerpta Botanica, or abridged Extracts translated from the
Foreign Journals, illustrative of, or connected with, the Botany of
Great Britain. By W. A. Leicuton, Esq., B.A., F.B.S.E., &c.
On the Anther of Chara vulgaris and Chara hispida, and the
Animalcules contained in it. By M. Gustavus Tourer... 44
VIII. Notes on Saxifraga umbrosa: By Cuarues C, Basrneton,
M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S., &c.; and by the Reviewer of Baines’s ‘ York-
RMIPEL RNA eee ma erae cece caoncsdem Conse aansbes sawed swans ose eiaccesiocces sicacusiea 47
IX. Notes on Birds. By T. C. Eyron, Esq., F.L.S.:—Menura
Dee ieee tesa carane see ete as eaidaecectriesncncntenaceedesisseea ssa Stee SooL Sonor 48
New Books :—An Introduction to the modern Classification of Insects,
founded on the Natural Habits and corresponding Organization
of the different Families, by J. O. Westwood, F.L.S., &c.—Otia
fuspanica,. suctore P= B.Webb;: No; -2.)scc.s2ceccsccsneccecestsose 53—58
Proceedings of the Zoological Society ; Geological Society; Microsco-
PIERS OCICRY cisc-cesena se naseamree sors iconastcesbacnscssoeaeveren™ anes 58—74
Absorption of Liquid Solutions by the Sap-vessels of Plants; Congrés
Scientifique de France; Mr. Thompson on Eels killed by the late
Frost ; Obituary—Francis Bauer, Esq. ; Mr. Paget on Halicherus
Gryphus ; Meteorological Observations and Table ............48. 74—80
lv CONTENTS.
NUMBER XLII.
X. Contributions to British Actinology. By Epwarp ForseEs,
M.W.S., For. Sec. B.S., &c. (With a Plate.) ......:ssseseesceeeeesereeeeee 81
XI. Description of some new Species and four new Genera of Rep-
tiles from Western Australia, discovered by John Gould, Esq. By J.
E. GRAY, Esq., F.R.S., 826. ...ssccecsceccccscnccsccennnreccceosssanccersoscnce 86
XII. Description of some new Species of Madeiran Fishes, with ad-
ditional information relating to those already described. By the Rev.
R. T. Lowe, M.A. .....0cccceescccecsssecscscscncecaccecscececsess ee seeenaecse 92
XIII. On the Species of Stickleback (Gasterosteus, Linn.) found in
Ireland. By Ww. Tuompson, Vice-Pres. Nat. Hist. Society of Belfast 95
XIV. Notice of Plants and Animals found in the Sulphureous
Waters of Harrowgate and Askern, Yorkshire. By E. Lankester,
INEST, He Litsisy OCC. iestaceoccecess coccsbiocess sense anne seiernnrnes case coreeeaneeer ce 105
XV. Remarks upon the Recent and Fossil Cycadez. By J. Morris,
ISG ie ceesaste curcnsenscmetccss tos scoseesdcscoceacsans ApunsasdeSboRocbonebodcSaend200¢ 110
XVI. Carabideous Insects collected by Charles Darwin, Esq., during
the Voyage of Her Majesty’s Ship Beagle. By G. R. Warernouss,
Esq.
XVII. Observations on a Keratose Sponge from Australia. By J.
S. Bowerzanx, Esq, F.G.S. (With a Plate.)....0-cscscsecesoscesesseeseos 129
XVIII. Notices of Nuropean Herbaria, particularly those most in-
teresting to the North American Botanist ........sccsseseeseeecereneeeens 132
New Books :—Monographie des Libellulidées d’Europe, par Edm. De
Selys Longchamps, Membre de plusieurs Sociétés savantes......... 141
Proceedings of the Entomological Society ; Zoological Society ; Royal
Botanical Society of Edinburgh; Wernerian Natural History So-
Cletyief Edinburg s.cccneteecs secs tdvacre sore freon Basu aeet 143—159
Mr. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds ;’ Birds of Kent ; Meteorological Observa-
fons: B00. Vablevess.css cassie. cncesesiaues seule ten sapncesemes tee 159—160
NUMBER XIJIII.
X1X. On the Alteration which the Atmosphere undergoes during
the Development of Heat in the Spadix of Colocasia odora. By Pro-
fessors) G.. JV ROLIK. ANG Wieekl Re NiR TERE i ois ccc snemada gs deregeeeneaawerts 161
XX. Note on the Occurrence of the Genus Diphya on the Coast of
Ireland. By G. C. Hynpman, Esq., Member of the Natural History
Society of Belfast ............ webinienieniecitsece a+ asse or =i cesicpa ane andeep ones 164
XXI. Report of the Results of Researches in Physiological Botany
made in the year 1839. By the late F. J. Meyvzen, M.D., Professor of
Botany. in the University of Berlin’ ¢.:.scns-0s--cseseeeceseetaseeeeseereee 166
XXII. Notes on Birds. By T. C. Eyron, Esq., F.L.S.......000..000 107
XXIII. Notices of European Herbaria, particularly those most in-
teresting to the North American Botanist!™. aitcice.catec tee cos ane eectee 179
CONTENTS. Vv
Page
XXIV. Excerpta Botanica, or abridged Extracts translated from
the Foreign Journals, illustrative of, or connected with, the Botany of
Great Britain. By W. A. Lercurton, Esq., B.A., F.B.S.E., &c.
On the Development of the Reproductive Organs of the Mis-
seltoe (Viscum album, Linn.). By M. Decaisne ......... 185
XXV. On the Origin of some of the Lower Forms of Vegetation.
Biya Mae) Elen Oxia STEPHENS 26.0.505.50d 2 secesescncesedessdeses ce eta 190
XXVI. An Amended List of the Species of the Genus Ovis. By
IDR AE BelsWE My ESQ on csuconconses vac sustiensraresswmenaspaoneceas ase sdeneete sts 195
XXVII. Addenda to the Flora of Norfolk. By Mr. 8. P. Woopwarp 201
XXVIII. On the Formation of the Stomata. By Huco Mont.
(WWE HAP abe \e ct hy. srccpes Sansenmevanean bassevdsacmcctgeatnessicedecnenh ematioe 206
New Books:—The Natural History of South Devon, by J.C. Bellamy,
Esq—Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di To-
PIGOS chee cece vocareretecsascecesseeach overs ste csaetcaronaereese boss. 209—211
Proceedings of the Microscopical Society; Botanical Society of Edin-
burgh; Linnean Society; Geological Society; Zoological So-
CHL ena caiowiitanacnsdcsnamecss iad eassWinscisasaaessaesasenscsescesaess 211—234
Zoological Observations at Tenby, by Dr. Davis (with a Plate); Mr.
Jennings on Eels killed by Frost; On the Occurrence of Anemone
ranunculoides, by the Rev. W. Hincks; On the Irish localities for
Dianthus plumarius, by W. T. Alexander, Esq.; Suicidal Powers
of Luidia ; Meteorological Observations and Table ......... 234—240
NUMBER XLIV.
XXIX. On the Anatomy of Nautilus. By M. VaLenciennes...... 241
XXX. Remarks on Red and Green Snow. By the late Prof. Meyen 245
XXXI. An Amended List of the Species of the Genus Ovis. By
Epwarp Brytn, Esq.......... Sncibadoced cdc ane onic Wages sae ateninse Mina ooraceonc ee 248
XXXII. Notes on some of the smaller British Mammalia, including
the Description of a New Species of 4rvicola, found in Scotland. By
fheveves UEONARDIGENYNSs- ME AGs Peli GLC.) on seceecciecsieeeisec’essienisetns 261
XXXIII. Supplement to a Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. By
Artuur Hitt Hassatt, Esq. Read before the Natural History So-
ciety of Dublin, November 6th, 1840 ............ Reelseaa dase aae a PoE COe 276
XXXIV. List of Phanerogamous Plants, together with the Crypto-
gamic Orders Filices, Equisetacee, and Lycopodiacee, observed in the
Shetland Islands. By Tuomas Epmonpsron, Jun., Esq. .......+.2.004- 287
XXXV. On the Composition of Chalk Rocks and Chalk Marl by in-
visible Organic Bodies: from the Observations of Dr. Ehrenberg. By
Tuomas Weaver, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S., M.R.L.A., &c. &e. ......2.0000 296
XXXVI. Description of a South American Wasp which collects
Honey. By Mr. Avam Wuirs, M.E.S., Assistant in the Zoological
Department of the British Museum. (With a Plate.) ......sesseeecseee 315
vi CONTENTS.
Page
XXXVII. Information respecting Zoological and Botanical Tra-
vellers:—Mr. Schomburgk.—Letter from Messrs. Forbes and Thomp-
son, with Captain Graves, in the Archipelago .............- Ficocvdceserwsed 348
New Books :—The Principles of Botany, by W. Hughes Willshire,
M.D.—Arcana Entomologica, or Illustrations of new, rare, and
interesting Exotic Insects, by J. O. Westwood, F.L.S., &c.; Na-
turhistorisk Tidskrift: edited by Henrik Kroyer, Copenhagen.—
Tijdschrift voor Natuurlijke Geschiedenis en Physiologie, by Pro-
fessors Van der Hoeven and De Vriese. Part VI. Leyden. 322—326
Proceedings of the Geological Society ; Zoological Society; Werne-
rian Society ; Royal Society of Edinburgh ..............:.s000e 326—348
Mr. Yarrell on Motacilla alba of Linnzeus; Mr. Johnson on Chetura
ruficollis ; Meteorological Observations and Table............ 350—352
NUMBER XLV.
XXXVIII. On the Existence of Brauchiz in the young Cecilie ;
and on a Modification and Extension of the Branchial Classification of
the Amphibia. By Joun Hoae, Esq., M.A., F.R.S., &e. ......eeeeeee «. 303
XXXIX. Supplement to a Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. By
Artuur Hirt Hassarz, Esq. Read before the Natural History So-
ciety of Dublin, November 6th, 1840. (With Plates). ..... .....cseeeee 363
XL. On the Composition of Chalk Rocks and Chalk Marl by invi-
sible Organic Bodies : from the Observations of Dr. Ehrenberg. By
Tuomas Weaver, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S., M.R,T.A., &c. &c. .....cc0res. 374
XLI. Report of the Results of Researches in Physiological Botany
made in the year 1839. By the late F. J. Meyun, M.D., Professor of
Botanyanithe University of" Berlin :...2sssss0acceseoces codes anes ssc scadeeee 399
XLII. On the Urari, the Arrow Poison of the Indians of Guiana;
with a description of the Plant from which it is extracted. By Roserr
PE MOMBURGK, WEQs” cerrccedasncucettcsctnssneadas-eseaccasersartancereroren 407
XLIII. A List of the Fossil Shells found in a Fluvio-Marine Deposit
at Clacton in Essex. By Joun Brown, Esq., F.G.S. .........scesseseeees 427
New Books :—On the Relation between the Holy Scriptures and some
parts of Geological Science, by J. Pye Smith, D.D.—The Cer-
tainties of Geology, by W. Sidney Gibson, F.G.S.—Linnza, ein
Journal fiir die Botanik, &e.—Icones Fungorum hucusque cogni-
LONE sre reisos\cteisleresleleceis eres coop dEad anqnodoocaqtonbenDUDSOgsEDSOSDOLCOR 429—434
Proceedings of the Entomological Society ; Linnzean Society ... 434—444
Third Meeting of the Men of Science of Italy ; Dr. Lush on the Madi,
or Chili Oil-seed, Madia sativa; Diurnea Novembris, or Novem-
ber Dagger ; Meteorological Observations and Table ...... 445—448
CONTENTS. vii
Page
NUMBER XLVI.
XLIV. On Gloionema paradoxum. By the Rev. M. J. Berketey,
RIN epi classe wesens vaaetaccess seencheceesss Anccigc daonndsaploooe ceADaDE sou sence 449
XLV. Supplement to descriptions of Exotic Fungi in ‘ Annals of
Nat. Hist.,’ vol. iii. pp. 322 and 375. By the Rev. M. J. Berxexey,
WV See U So ons wenecinene anes ee aiccc semanas cas csisne dens sesicens ceuisens ss dileissiesc 451
XLVI, A List of Plants collected by Charles Fellows, Esq., during
his Tour in Lycia and Caria ; with descriptions of the New Species.
By Daviv Don, Esq., Prof. Bot. King’s College ...........scsseceseeseeees 454
XLVII. Report of the Results of Researches in Physiological Botany
made in the year 1839. By the late F. J. Meyven, M.D., Professor of
Botany mi) the University of Berlin: so. ..cecs..c0cscacscase+s ube nan esnaesos 460
XLVIII. Descriptions of new or little known Arachnida. By Mr.
Ava Wuirte, Assistant in the Zoological Department of the British
MuUSCUM xe occscs.sconeracsene biweeees “Gaaneddasnnbon- Sebbsec caasoaedBeapsce Sieben 471
XLIX. Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. By Wa. Tuomrson,
Esq., Vice-Pres. Natural History Society of Belfast ...... Baaceseasmcasae 477
L. Description of two new Genera of Irish Zoophytes. By Artuur
Hirt Hassatt, Esq., Corresponding Member of the Natural History
Occ humor DITA eeacrtadtsnest. assacheeRseNe Nec ucailsweswctcessinesseccundeacsaae 483
LJ“ Noteson Birds. By T. C. Eyron, Bsq.; POLS: 2............ Sanco. CHS
LIT. A Catalogue of Fossil Fish in the Collections of the Eart or
Enniskinuen, F.G.S., &c., and Sir Puitre Grey Ecerton, Bart.,
F.R.S., &c. ..... Shep COREOS aU SEER Seed GEG EER SAREE Aenea onc oa a uenBe Bea peonenay 487
LIII. Information respecting Zoological and Botanical Travellers :—
Mr. Forbes and Mr. Thompson.—Mr. Schomburgk.—Mr. W. S. Mac-
Beayi reves eeteseek Sencha beh tae Baldenlestuicatias -sicede clic seismelicloweetctcnene es eniae 520
New Books :—Natural History as a Branch of General Education,
by, Robert Patterson, Bsdo-.-ssc.csssccocenedsrseecedseeusuarosvencee ses -- 498
Proceedings of the Zoological Society ; Geological Society ...... 503—519
New Genus of Mexican Glirine Mammalia; On a new European Ge-
nus of Freshwater Fish, by F. Heckel; Forbes’s Starfishes, Echi-
nus lividus; Speaking Canary Bird; Birds of Kent; Emberiza
Hortulana; Diluvial [ Glacial ?] Scratches on Rocks in America;
Mr. Shuckard on the Proceedings of the Entomological Society ;
Obituary—C. S. Rafinesque; Meteorological Observations and
TAD ery cmccnssccs ss eseradeeeeasacns se SE CACKCHH HEC BS SCE DCO octenine saan 521—528
NUMBER XLVII. SUPPLEMENT.
Proceedings of the Royal Society ; Linnzean Society; Entomological
Society ; Zoological Society ......... Saaieaienaseileieiaieite penaenedeaee 529—578
PRGCK: oeer acres econ Sobsess48s4 shoo snbtdnednnos suena sosbeacondses basiseeseciesan 579
~
Prate I.
PLATES IN VOL. VII.
British Actiniade.
Fig. 1, 2, 3. Cyanea coccinea; (from Tenby.)
{ Development of Stomata in Hyacinthus orientalis.
jWite
III.
IV.
V.
. Flustra carnosa *; Hermia glandulosa; Sertularia Margarita ;
=
ae aS
MH SS
Trish Zoophytes.
“a~
Fig. 4, 5. Helix conoidea; (fossil from Essex.)
Horny Sponge from Australia.
Nest of Myrapetra scutellaris, a South American Wasp.
Horns of various species of Sheep.
Sertularia pumila.
. Thuiaria articulata.
. Plumularia frutescens; Valkeria imbricata; Langenella repens?
Valkeria (new species) ; Hippothoa lanceolata.
. Cellepora bimucronata ; Lepralia ciliata, appensa, pedilostoma,
insignis, cylindrica, punctata, linearis.
X. Tubulipora lobulata; Alcyonidium hirsutum; Echinochorium
L clavigerum.
XI. Metamorphoses of the Spur-shaped Nectaries of Aquilegia vul-
garis.
XII. Urari Plant, Strychnos toxifera, Schomb.
XIII Fruit of the Urari Plant.
* | Gloionema paradoxum ; fig. a. (I—8).
* In Plate VI. this figure is by mistake given as Coryne squamata. It
is, in reality, a representation of Flustra carnosa, Johnston (see p. 369), of
which it is a correct figure, with the exception of the number of the tenta-
cula, which should have been 30.
Erratum, p. 373, line 33, for Coryne sguamata read Flustra carnosa,
THE ANNALS
AND
MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY.
No. 41. MARCH 1841.
I.— Considerations respecting Spur-shaped Nectaries, and those
of the Aquilegia vulgaris in particular. By M. Cu. Mor-
REN, Professor in ordinary at the University of Liége,
Member of the Royal Academy of Brussels, &c.*
[With a Plate. ]
THE Columbine, that pretty ranunculaceous flower of our
woods, deserves attention, as well on account of its structure,
curious as it is, and, we venture to add, but little known, as
from the historical recollections which it brings to mind. To
say nothing here of the medicinal virtues which Dioscorides
attributed to his Jsopyron or to his Phasiolon,—a plant which
Fabius Columna, Clusius, Dodonzeus and many other learned
botanists suppose to be no other than the Columbine itself ;
and not to mention Adrian Junius, who also quotes it as a
medical plant; or Francois Rapard, a celebrated physician of
Bruges, who addressed to Clusius a letter upon its uses in
difficult labours ; ought we not to remark that its singular nec-
taries, compared by some to the beak and talons of an eagle,
by others to the graceful neck of the pigeon, by some to
rams’-horns, and by others to capuchins’ hoods, had so gained
the attention of the painters of the middle ages, that it be-
came one of the favourite flowers, placed in great profusion in
the illuminations of missals and manuscripts of the time? The
‘ancoiles’ or the ‘ ancolyes’ were there intermixed with the
leaves, flowers, or fruit of the strawberry or of the campanula ;
and Memling was most particularly attached to it. When
Dodoens wrote his “ Ctupdt-Bork,” the name Aguileia or
Aquilina was still a novelty just introduced, he says, by the
latest phytographers of his own time. The name Aguilegia
* Translated from the original communicated by the Author:
B
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii.
2 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries
which he gives it calls to mind the comparison already men-
tioned, of the beak and talons of an eagle; but since that time
that of Columbine prevailed in England and in Holland, where
they were fonder of likening the spurred petal of this flower
to the stately neck of a pigeon. When one of these flowers
is turned upside-down, says an English author *, we might
fancy we saw a group of young eagles, or, if we like better, a
nest of pigeons. It is evident that these spur-shaped necta-
ries had considerable influence on the mind of Dodoens, since
on their account he places his Akeleyen (‘ancolies, columbines;)
between the Cypripedium Calceolus, a monocotyledonous
plant, and his Orant or Antirrhinum majus,—an alliance
which would not at all square with our present ideas of classi-
fication by families. By a singular chance, the Cypripedium,
which in our mythological language we call the Venus’s foot,
was at that period of religious struggles called Our Lady’s
shoe (Calceolus Marie), and the Columbine was named in its
turn the Virgin’s glove: thus we see that shoes and gloves
shook hands in our Lady’s toilet.
Chief ornament of the gardens of the middle ages, and even
of those of the sixteenth century, the 4quilegia, carefully and
almost universally cultivated, produced those varieties which
modern botanists have pointed out in this species. Joost van
Ravelingen, the commentator of Dodoens, and L’Obel+, men-
tion the varieties in colour and those of form to be met with
in their time: blue, red, flesh-coloured, blue and white, white
and variegated. The garden of a gentleman of Leyden, Jean
van Hogelande, produced an Aquilegia pleno flore roseo, which
Clusius described and illustrated. The same botanist had also
recorded a variety truly monstrous (Aquilegia degener), in
that the petals, being reduced to their primitive type of leaves,
had remained green; only Van Ravelingen did not think that
such monstrosities were worth the pains of describing. Now-
a-days we should be eager to do it, and not without reason ;
for the organography of such a flower is very interesting to
know, in relation to the subject which will occupy us further
on.
The varieties of structure known under the name of Aqui-
legia vulgaris corniculata, in which Biriat and DeCandolle §
discovered that the cornets are deviations of the anther,
* Burnett's Outlines of Botany, p. 840.
+ Generally written Lobel; but the true name of the author of the Stir-
pium Historia was Matthias De L’Obel, as appears from his letters and the
portrait engraved during his life-time.
{ Biria. Monographie des Rénonculacées. Montpellier, 1811,
§ DeCandolle. Organographie, tom. i. p. 496.
of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 3
and those which bear the name of Aquilegia vulgaris ecal-
carata or stellata, in which, according to these authors, the
petals proceed from modified staminal filaments without an-
thers—these varieties had been already described by Clusius,
Dodoens and L’Obel*. Moreover, these authors, besides
the simple, semi-double and double varieties of these two
principal forms (true sub-varieties which we still possess),
also mention Columbines with inverted flowers (Aquileia flore
inverso variegato). We might suppose, from the Dodonzan
context, that it was hereby understood that the flowers, in-
stead of being pendent, were upright ..... “Die niet en ber-
schillen ban de ander Ban Dat de bloenten aberechts
Staen.” But we know that in this variety, the bases of the
spurs being twisted, the spur itself has an upward direction.
We cannot but take an interest in observing the pleasures
of the horticulturists of those times. _Now-a-days these Co-
lumbines are treated with disregard, and dismissed as fit only
for the garden of the cottager or village Curé, or, at most,
are only permitted to grow in the shade of some forgotten nook
of our villas; but let us not say too much: fashion, which revives
all antiquated things, may some day assert its claim upon
these Columbines of the Castels. Already in the Botanic Gar-
den at Brussels, we have seen pretty borders entirely filled
with this plant of the middle ages.
The Columbine is really a very interesting flower, on ac-
count of its nectaries; and their genesis not being known, at
least so far as we are aware, we have taken them as the prin-
cipal subject of our researches: our object has been to study
them comparatively in the different varieties of the common
species, and in some other species which we had at hand; se-
condly, to observe the monstrous structures ; thirdly, to take
them at their different degrees of evolution, in order to esta-
blish their true genesis; and, lastly, to examine their histo-
logy, so as to ascertain how in their forms so varied the in-
terior tissues were affected.
So long as the laws of metamorphoses had not acquired
the right of citizenship in the domains of science, calcariform -
nectaries had to be considered as special pieces, born ad hoc,
and being such by their proper nature, without an anterior
nature, without a type from which they were derived. Although
Linnzus had said, “Si nectarium a petalis distinctum, com-
muniter ludit ;” he also said, “ distincta esse nectaria a corolla
constat exemplis: Aconitum, Aquilegia,’ &c.+.—They were,
then, the floral pieces whose secretion of honey determined
* Dodoens. Cruydt-Boek, 1644, p. 274,
+ Linnzi Philosophia Botanica: Fructificatio i, 110.
B2
4 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries
their character, and that character raised them to the-rank of
organs sui generis, not proceeding from any other :—they
were, because they were.
They were, however, not nectaries, because by their nature
they were stamens: here is that truth which science had not
then become possessed of.
But when, at the end of the last century, Geethe, following
the example of Wolff, established his celebrated theory of the
metamorphosis of plants, the nectaries at once lost their auto-
chthonous nature ; they were no longer aboriginal organs. On
the contrary, in this new theory the nectaries became essen-
tially organs of transition, mere forms of anterior organs ; they
were, in short, intermediary organs of passage between the pe-
tals and the stamens*. In the spirit of this philosophic me-
thod, it was necessary to understand, that in order for the
petal to become a stamen, in an ascending metamorphosis, it
must previously pass through the form of a nectary. More-
over, Goethe, who took precisely the Columbine as the exam-
ple of one of the most remarkable and most striking trans-
formations, considered, as he says, the cuculliform nectaries of
this flower asaderivation from the petalst. We shall see, on the
contrary, that the progress of nature is a descending metamor-
phosis ; that is tu say, that the nectary is, in its genesis, a sta-
men, and subsidiarily, that a stamen being developed as such,
it may afterwards turn into a nectary.
The theory of Goethe had made too little impression in
France to admit of the supposition, that in 1815 Mirbel set
out from it when he regarded the nectaries of the Columbine,
as well as all organs of the same kind, as anomalous forms of
the parts of the perianthium. The spur-shaped cornets of the
Aquilegia were also, in his eyes, forms of petals; but the ano-
maly attacking all the petals at once, the flower remained 7e-
gular {. It was one of the successive alterations of types,
and in the Columbine particularly this alteration was created
in order to become an organ of secretion. A glandular lamina
existed for this purpose at the bottom of the cornet-shaped
petals$. The petal was the type.
This lamina we have never found ; and in the Aquilegia glan-
dulosa, the Aquilegia atrata, &c., we have seen that there only
exist one, or two, or three cornets without the regularity of
the flower being perverted, as is the case in the Nasturtium,
* Goethe. E£uvres d'Histoire Naturelle. Edition de Martius et Turpin.
Paris, 1837, p. 226.
+ Ibid, p. 228, chap. 56.
{ Mirbel. Elémens de Physiologie, vol.i. p. 269.
§ Goethe. Céuvres d’Histoire Naturelle. Edition de Martius.
of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 5
Tropeolum, or the Lark’s-spur. The great German poet’s
notions had not indeed at first all possible success in this
country. Willdenow always asserted that the spur (calcar)
was more an organ intended to preserve the nectar than to
prepare it, and that it was furthermore a sacciform elongation
of the corolline corona*. The first of these facts is evidently
erroneous. The second was also admitted by Jacquin.
Sprengel, when opposing Vaillant, who had also himself
declared that the nectary was always a production of the
corolla, placed the spurs of the Columbine in his class of Nec-
tarothece, and characterized by the presence of the secreting
gland at the bottom of the cornet. Moreover, it never occurred
to his mind to investigate the anterior nature of this appara-
tus in the Passifloree, in the Aconites, and a multitude of
other plants; he sees only peculiar /ittle machines, more or
less ornamented: machinule peculiares ...... eleganter co-
loratet.
DeCandolle, in 1819, adopts this view of the subject; but
the spur, according to him, is of a very different nature,—
an elongation, one while of the calyx, one while of the corolla,
one while of the perigonium; but the stamens are still ex-
cluded from the floral organs which may produce this nec-
tary {. However, a year before, the celebrated botanist of Ge-
neva had positively declared that, in the Aquilegie corniculate,
without regard to species, the supplementary spurs arose from
a modification of the anthers which lengthened downwards ;
moreoyer, he recognises the origin of the stellated varieties
from the abortion of the authers, and from the hypertrophy
of the filaments ; and lastly, that the scales which are situated
between the carpels and the stamens are stamens without
anthers, and with dilated and membranous filaments$. Buiria
had made known the former facts||. In 1827 these ideas were
again brought forward in the Organographie végétale*|. They
are, undeniably, the most accordant to the real state of
things.
Among the most recent authors we may mention Kurr,
who places the spurs of the Columbine with his nectarostig-
mata. A very curious remark of this accurate writer is, that
the greenish glands which secrete the nectar at the bottom of
* Willdenow. Grundriss der Krauterkunde, cap. 86-88. (Terminologie.)
+ Linnezi Phil. Bot. edit. Sprengel (notes). Fructificatio 110.
+ DeCandolle. Théorie élémentaire, p. 406, § 395.
§ DeCandolle. Systema Regni Vegetabilis, vol. i. p. 333.
|| Biria. Histoire naturelle et médicale des Rénoucules, 1 fasc. Montpellier,
1811.
§| DeCandolle. Organographie, vol. i. pp. 484—496.
6 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries
the spurred cornet, do not begin to afford this sugared liquid
until precisely when the first anther blows. The secretion
lasts only as long as the stamens are capable of performing
their functions, and at the end of three or four days the
flower leaves off this ejection of fluid and of pollen, and
drops the organs which produced both the one and the other*.
This curious remark is quite correct; we have verified it.
From this we might be led to suppose that the secretion of
the nectar, which is here so intimately connected with the
functions of the stamens, becomes necessary to the action of
the sexes; but from ten unblown flowers, where there had
been neither dehiscence of the anthers, nor secretion of nectar
by the spurs, Kurr cut away those organs: the further de-
velopment took place without any difference, and these flowers
bore as many and as large fruits as they ordinarily do; the
seeds germinated as usual}. This experiment gives great
support to those who consider the nectar as being only a true
excretion, comparable to our urine, and which is of no use,
at least in the great majority of cases, in the process of fecun-
dation, as was generally supposed. Kurr, however, does not
give his opinion as to the proper nature of the spurs.
Lindley, in his new edition of the ‘ Introduction to Botany,’
(1839) no longer gives (to the great regret of the friends of deep
scientific research) the interesting and useful part on mor-
phology; but this judicious author, in his edition of 1832{,
had published some very curious details upon the Aquilegia
vulgaris. ‘The petals of this plant,” says he, “consist of a
long, sessile, purple horn or bag, with a spreading margin,
while the stamens consist of a slender filament, bearing a
small, oblong, 2-celled, yellow anther. In single and regularly-
formed flowers, nothing can be more unlike than the petals and
stamens; but in double flowers the transition is complete.
The petals which first begin to change, provide themselves
with slender ungues: the next contract their margin, and
acquire a still longer unguis: in the next the purple margin
disappears entirely ; two yellow lobes like the cells of the
anther take its place, and the horn, diminished in size, no
longer proceeds from the base, as in the genuine petal, but
from the apex of the now filiform unguis: in the last transi-
tion the lobes of the anther are more fully formed, and the
horn is almost contracted within the dimensions of the con-
nective, retaining, however, its purple colour: the next stage
* Kurr. Untersuchungen tiber die Bedeutung, &c. Stutgard, 1833.
f Ubid} pp. 128:
{ Lindley. Introduction to Botany (1832), p. 515.—[Ed. 1835, p. 536.]
of the Aquilegia vulgaris, r§
is the perfect stamen. No further evidence,” says our author,
“can, I think, be required of the formation of stamens out of
petals.”
We see that Lindley had here followed the impulse given
by Geethe, and that he looked upon the cuculliform petals
(Richard) as proceeding towards the formation of the stamina
by an ascending metamorphosis. At present the spur is no
longer in his view anything but a modified petal*. A dis-
covery which we cannot dispute with him, since the germ of it
appears in his words, is that the horn of the Columbine is
really a lengthened connective,—a thing which we shall also
establish by direct proofs hereafter.
Although G. W. Bischoff, Professor of Botany at Heidel-
berg, does not give this morphological genesis of the spur in
the Aquilegia, still this author helps to lead us to believe that
this is really the means which nature employs, in what he
has remarked respecting the metamorphosis of the nectar-
bearing horns of the Helleborus fctidus into normal stamenst.
Link sees nothing in the spur but a continuation of the
petal, characterized by the presence, at the end of its cavity,
of a cellular gland, but of which the cellules have walls
thicker than ordinary,—a thing which we take the liberty
of not admitting}. After M. Vogel of Bonn had sent me
his elegant memoir on the development of the parts of the
flower in the Leguminose§, the study of the formation of
calcariform or cuculliform nectaries, according to the glosso-
logy of Richard||, became still more interesting. Indeed,
Schleiden and Vogel having proved, by their Jabours, that it is
not merely in idea, as a mental abstraction, that we are to
see in the floral organs nothing but the axis of the plant and
its leaves, but that this axis and its green leaves are really
and substantially found, placed regularly in the very small
buds, we thought that the investigation of the genesis of the
nectaries in the Columbine could not be without scientific
interest. DeCandolle came to consider these horn-shaped
nectaries as anthers, by comparison; Lindley came to the
same conclusion by the observation of teratological cases ; it
was become therefore curious to test these views @ priori
and @ posteriori by organogenic proofs: and this is what we
have proposed to ourselves.
* Lindley. Introduction to Botany (1839), p. 169.
+ Gottlob Wilhelm Bischoff. Lehrbuch der Botanik, vol. i. p. 404. (1833.)
¢ Link. Elementa Philosophie Botanice, vol. ii. p. 130.
§ Schleiden und Vogel. Beitrage zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Blu-
mentheile bei den Leguminosen. (Act. Nat. Curios. vol. xix. p. 1.)
|| Richard. Nouv. Elémens de Botanique, 1888, p. 333.
8 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries
Let us see, first, what takes place m a flower of Aquilegia
vulgaris calcarata.
1. Metamorphosis of the stamen into a spur-shaped nectary.
The stamen of the Columbine has a thread-shaped filament
slender, flexible and yellow, and a two-celled anther with pa-
rallel cells, slightly swelled, opening with a slit and united by
a narrow connective, the whole yellow. The connective is
even hardly visible (Plate XI. fig. 1).
In many flowers, we find along the spire which leads in-
sensibly from the androeceum to the corolla, stamens which
turn into nectaries. To bring this about, the filament en-
larges at its base; the connective is, at the opposite pole,
the other organ which becomes modified, and it is even the
most active of all in this transformation. It enlarges above,
by separating the two loculi of the anther, and it grows to a
point. This is not slow in becoming bifurcate, so that the
connective is soon bilobate. (Figs. 2 and 7.)
To this modification, which up to this period does not at-
tack the regularity of the organ, two ways of transformation
succeed, In the one, one of the loculi of the anther disap-
pears, in the other it remains visible with its fellow. The
first of these modifications might induce a belief that the spur
as a sac formed by one half of an anther or by a loculus, but
this genesis is but a deceitful appearance. The second way
of transformation proves that the spur is a sac-shaped con-
nective, and that the two lobes of its limb represent the two
loculi of the anther originally united by this same connective.
If such a spur-shaped nectary can be obtained, as from its
nectar-secreting gland is truly a nectary, and that im it the
two lobes of its limb exist as an elongation of the two an-
ther-cells, still visible enough to attest their presence, it is
clear that this second way of transformation should be ad-
mitted. Now this is precisely what experience confirms. In
the Columbine we find this form, not so frequently as the
first, it is true; but it is found, and that is all that is neces-
sary. This case we have delineated (Plate VII. fig.6). Ona
stamen thus modified, besides a well-formed filament (c h),
we find the two loculi of the anther, still bearing pollen, but
which open more widely (a 4), separated by a small connec-
tivaleminence (c). Each of the swellings which represent the
anther-cells produces an elongation in form of a thick margin
(e), which, reaching from the inside to the outside, goes to
form the circumference of the two lobes of the cornet (d g),
separated by aslit (/). Each lobe corresponds to a cell, and
originates from it; it is only indeed that same cell length-
of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 9
ened. Lastly, 7 represents the belly of the cornet, and at * we
find the gland which, for its part, secretes whilst the pollen
no longer issues from the loculi, and little by little its struc-
ture is annihilated.
This case of metamorphosis not only proves, as we said
above, that the two lobes of the cornet of the Columbine are
derivations from the cells of the anther, but it puts out of
doubt that the tube of the cornet is the lengthened connective.
A circumstance which we must not lose sight of in this phi-
losophic study of a metamorphosed flower, is that the nectar-
bearmg gland, an organ of emission, and which rids the
flower of its excess of carbon, is found at the opposite pole
to the pollen-bearing loculi, other organs of emission which
also excrete from the individual, but in this case for the pre-
servation of the species, a substance eminently charged with
carbon. At the two poles then the same function exists,
but the one does not begin till the other ceases; that is to say,
the nectarial gland does not exist or become developed until
the pollen apparatus wastes away and becomes obsolete.
This subject certainly merits a reflection; even should I be
accused of seeing, in Botany, more than my own eyes can
see, and especially should I be accused of allowing to myself,
in a science of observation, some stretch of imagination. For
my part, I could never comprehend how inquiry into the truths
of nature should put aside the understanding, and reduce
it to a state of inaction which would render it useless. Be-
hind and above facts I always conceive something superior
and anterior; for facts are effects, and it is to the know-
ledge of causes that we ought to endeavour to come. Now
here, in the particular problem which occupies us, I see a
verification of the law of organic compensation and a realiza-
tion of the unity of composition. Thus, the nectaries are ONE
with the stamens, the stamens ONE with the leaves, the leaves
ONE with themselves, as autochthonous organs. So much
for the law of unity. Moreover, the gland is at the end of the
nectary, because, by its nature a stamen, the pollen is at
the other end; there is a change in the product, but not a
change of nature, and by the side of this law of polarity there
is that of compensation; for, in proportion as the anther-cell
closes to render the pollen adortive, there is a development of
the gland which begins to secrete the nectar; the evolution of
the gland brings on the atrophy of the cell, but, fundamentally,
there always remains an apparatus of emission.
Let us return to the Columbine: we have said that one
way of transformation, and it is the most common one, would
lead to a belief that the nectar-bearing sac may be in some
instances the representative of a loculus of the anther. From
10 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries
a slight examination we should in fact conclude so. As a
proof of this, see the states delineated figures 3, 4, 5 and 6.
We otten see a stamen, with a filament dilated at its base,
take two horns above (¢ d@), whilst one loculus of the anther,
inflated, no longer yields pollen; and the other, being atro-
phized to such a degree as no longer to appear except as a
yellow gland (4), seems to have produced a rounded sac (e).
This sac, the commencement of the cornet, should we not
suppose it to be a modified anther-cell? and yet we have
just seen that the tendency of the cells is to produce the
lobes of the limb of the cornet, and not its tube. There
is a mistake, indeed, as to the true signification of this en-
largement, which is nothing but the middle of the connective
itself. ‘The connective extends itself outwards, and its hy-
pertrophy brings with it the atrophy of the cells or of one
cell of the anther; it signifies little whence substance comes
to it, so that it only come. This is why the production of
the spur does not always cause the whole anther to be meta-
morphosed all at once.
‘The better-formed cornets, and which even possess all the
essential parts,—expanded limb, apex with two lobes and a slit,
dilated faux, lengthened tube and terminal gland; these cornets,
I say, sometimes still exhibit a trace of their old and primi-
tive nature in the anther-cell, hardly visible, but distinguished
by its yellow colour, whilst all the rest is white and blue, and,
above all, distinguished by the grains of pollen that it still
encloses in its bosom (fig. 4).
The conditions (figs. 5 and 6) are tendencies towards a re-
eularized form of well-constituted nectaries. The condition
(fig. 6) is that found in the common Aquilegie. Nothing here
would lead to the supposition of an antherine nature, had not
this strange metamorphosis been followed step by step.
It is evident, that all these cornets being hollow, and de-
veloped one above the other in several spirals (fig. 16), all like-
wise enter one into another (fig.8), but it is inexact to say
that then the glands no longer secrete. This is a mistake :
the secretion continues, and, indeed, the tubes never com-
pletely close those into which they have entered.
Let us now examine in what manner the cornets are gene-
rated in a flower of Aquilegia taken at its first periods of de-
velopment.
2. Organogeny of the spur-shaped nectaries.
To ascertain this organogeny, we have followed the method
employed by Schleiden and Vogel. Taking a very young
bud, which had hardly attained the length of a millimeter and
of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 11
a half (fig. 10), we took off its calyx in water and with very fine
needles. ‘The central part then showed itself as a little spher eS
whereon the stamina, having just quitted their form of green
foliary gibbosities, now assumed that of two parallel protu-
berances (figs. 11 and 12). Upon these the connective is pro-
portionally more developed than at a later period (fig. 12) ;
the filament is dilated and very small; the anther is pro-
portionally much larger, but it is still discoid, so that it is
easier to discover in it the form of the blade of a leaf.
We were very curious to ascertain what the petals then were.
The specimen which we dissected was one which would have
had two rows of cornets. Now one of these rows (the exte-
rior one) was formed by small circular laminze, barely provided
with a support, but these laminz exhibited the same consti-
tution as the anthers of the stamens described above (fig. 14) :
in fact, two gibbosities, representing the anther-cells (a, c) ;
a very broad connective (4); and around all this a disc (d), of
which, moreover, the trace also exists on the anther of a sta-
men proceeding in its development as such.
Here it is impossible to mistake the primitive staminal na-
ture of the organ which at a later period is to become a hood-
shaped petal, that is to say, a cornet-shaped nectary. It is
evident that, after the first condition of the flower,—that in
which all the parts were still cellular tubercles, similar to the
primitive condition of a leaf,—the nectarial petal, before be-
coming such, was similar to a stamen. This is what caused
us to say above, that the spur-shaped nectaries of the Columbine
did not produce stamens by ascending metamorphosis, but that
they were, on the contrary, stamens modified by a descending
metamorphosis. In short, before being petals, they are rather
stamens, or at least anthers, than anything else.
The row of small scales, which also become hood-shaped
petals, but placed higher, exhibits at this age of the flower a
more complete disappearance of the anther-like form. The
anther betrays itself there only by the dilatation of the blade
and its attenuated border (fig. 13 4), but there is but one com-
mon gibbosity in the place of the two parts which represented
the loculi.
We tookabud three millimeters long (fig. 15), and stripped
it of its calycinal envelopes. The stamens in this were better
constituted, the filaments lengthened, the connective propor-
tionally more contracted, and the loculi very distinct (fig. 17).
The petaloid blades, on the contrary, were very broad, hardly
pedicelled ; but in the middle there is still the trace of the con-
nective (J, fig. 19), and on the sides two protuberances, not so
large, but prominent enough to discover in them the anther-
12 M. Morren on the Spur-shaped Nectaries
cells (fig. 19, @) ; traces or waves which incline us to suppose
that there is a lateral extension of these cells to produce the
petaloid lamina (fig. 19, c). It is evident that this is the
anther flattening and dilating itself in order to become the
petaloid lamina; and hardly does a bud attain the length of
five millimeters before the laminz are hollowed into tubes ;
and the spur-shaped nectaries, already making a projection
outwards between the sepals of the calyx, are all formed (figs.
20 and 21). .
This examination proves that, in the genesis of the spur-
shaped nectaries, Nature first forms a leaf, then a stamen, and
that she converts the anther of this into a petal, at first flat
and then hood-shaped.
The nectary is then always a derivation from the stamen
—a descending metamorphosis of the stamen.
This is precisely one of the facts which we have stated
above. If it be to the detriment of the anthers that these
singular spurs are produced in the Columbine, it was also a
matter of interest for us to inquire if the laminz noticed by
DeCandolle between the carpels and the stamens are in reality
abortive stamens. It is known that this author was in doubt
concerning the nature of these organs. “ One might say,” he
writes, in his ‘ Organography *,’ “ that they are either abor-
tive stamens or interior petals.” The latter opinion would be
contrary to all the laws of Morphology previously established,
for the corolline apparatus is exterior to the andreeceum.
However, to ascertain the true nature of these lamelle, we have
had recourse to an organogenic examination.
In a bud three millimeters long, we found these lamellze
composed (fig. 18) of a distinct base and summit. The sum-
mit is formed of two lateral swellings (a 4, fig. 18), between
which is a projecting lamella (ce, fig. 18). The base is lamelloid
and winged, with a nervure in the middle (d, fig. 18). There
is here evidently a staminal structure: the swellings are the
loculi of the anther, the projecting lamella the connective, and
the lamelloid base the filament.
Now, in a well-developed flower, nothing remains of this
summit, which becomes a true continuation of the lamella of
the base. Thus the filament suffers hypertrophy, especially
in breadth, and the anther, on the contrary, suffers atrophy.
The base carries away the summit; the one pole as it dilates
diminishes the other.
The /amelle of the Columbine are then really stamens mo-
dified by the annihilation of the pollen-bearing apparatus, and
by the super-development of the filament.
* Vol. i. p. 484:
of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 13
It now became interesting, after these researches, to study
what takes place in the tissues when the anther becomes a
nectary. Our observations upon this we comprise in the fol-
lowing third chapter.
3. Histology of the nectary.
The anther is, as appears from the observations of Purkinje,
Mirbel, &c., an apparatus characterized by a peculiar form of
tissue. The endotheca, formed by fibro-cellular cells (inen-
chyme), hence affords a valuable means of distinguishing the
part which the tissulary elements perform in metamorphoses.
We were, for our part, greatly desirous of ascertaining this,
after observation had convinced us that one stamen will
change its nature and become a petal, and notwithstanding,
will show in its interior tissue its first destination; whilst
another stamen will modify its tissues along with its exterior
form. We shall instance here, for the first of these cases,
what we have seen in the Reseda odorata, mediterranea, lu-
tea, luteola, &c. Our readers no doubt remember the inter-
esting discussion on the nature of this flower between Dr.
Lindley on one side, Mr. Robert Brown and Mr. Henslow
on the other. Now in these flowers it is evident that the white
filaments, which we have discovered to be the only organs of
odour in this fragrant flower, are but modified stamens*. In-
deed, we find in their interior, and especially at the upper end,
an inenchymatous tissue, formed of fibre-bearing cells similar
to those of the endotheca of an anther of the same plant,—in-
deed, identical with them. Now we do not think that a petal,
properly so called, contains a similar tissue, excepting in some
genera of Orchidee, as the Catasetum. The staminal nature
becomes quite evident by means of this entirely endothecal
anatomy. In other plants, as for example in the Peonia offi-
cinalis, where the stamen becomes a petal, nothing similar
takes place. The tissue of the modified part is decidedly either
altogether staminal (inenchymatous), or altogether corolline
(cellular).
Purkinje had already made known the form of the inenchy-
matous cells of the endotheca of the Aqguilegia Gleberit. The
fibres are radiated, oblique, and unite at the centre in a plate.
The endothecal cells of the Aquilegia vulgaris (Plate XI. fig. 22)
* There is often a monstrosity in the Reseda which causes atrophy in the
white filaments or the fringes of the petals. Then the flower is without
any scent. No sooner are these fringes developed than the perfume be-
gins to be perceptible. White colour in plants is often the indication of an
agreeable scent. Here it is the stamens that grow white, in order to send
forth a perfume.
+ De Cellulis Antherarum fibrosis, p. 55. tab. xv. fig. 15.
14 M. Morven on the Spur-shaped Nectaries
are the same. They are stars, with diverging rays, to the
number of eight or ten, which, seen from above, resemble the
actinenchyme of Hayne. The junction of the radiating fibres
takes place on a large plate (fig. 22, 4).
What becomes of this inenchymatous tissue in the meta-
morphosis of the anther into a spur? Does it continue with
its form, as in the Reseda, or does it disappear, as in the Pe-
onia? With respect to this, observation shows, that the fibri-
ferous cells lose their fibres at the same time that they change
their form: from having been spheerenchyme this tissue be-
comes pinenchyme (fig. 22, A and B); and whilst the cell,
from being spherical as it had been, becomes tubuliform, the
fibre is resolved and disappears ; its colour changes from yel-
low to blue, and instead of a star, only a blue liquid is seen
there, without granules. I did not observe that the cytoblast,
although my attention was especially fixed upon it, acted the
least part in this histological metamorphosis.
When the spur is formed, the nectar-bearing gland appears
like a mass of rounded cells (fig. 23 6), smaller and rounder
than those of the derm (fig. 23 a).
The vascular system of the connective, on the contrary, per-
forms an important part in this succession of changes of form,
structure and function. Restricted at first, constituted by
few fibres, in which we see fine trachee. hard to be unrolled,
and pleurenchyme, this system soon divaricates its anasto-
moses, and fibres may be perceived in various directions, which,
united, form an apparatus much larger than the primitive
state.
It is evident from these researches, that the metamorphosis
of the anther into a spur, that the change of the pollen-bearing
apparatus into the nectar-bearing apparatus, attack the deep-
est tissues, and that if a morphological metamorphosis takes
place, an histological metamorphosis takes place also. If the
functions change, there is, as we see, a phenomenal transla-
tion of this change by that which exists most intimately in
the organization—the tissular constitution. Cases of meta-
morphosis, indeed, only become interesting to the physiolo-
gist, when he comes to know what at the same time is pass-
ing in the tissues. We may therefore say here, that if, in the
Columbine, the connective forms the nectar-bearing spur, this
change leads to the metamorphosis of the inenchyme of the
anther-cells into parenchyme, and that the metamorphosis at-
tacks in as great a degree the entire organism as the tissues
which compose it.
We have now to add a few words relative to the varieties of
Aquilegie called stellated. DeCandolle attributes the peta-
of the Aquilegia vulgaris. 15
loid form of the petals of these varieties to their being formed
only by the filaments of modified stamens in which the an-
thers are abortive. This would be an hypertrophy of the sta-
minal filaments. We would not venture to say that this is
exact: on the contrary, we think that the petaloid and not
cuculliform laminz of the ste//ated Columbines are also in
reality only modified connectives, and we rest this opinion
on the fact that the genesis of these laminz presents in the
young flowers the same primary forms as the cornets: these
are at first stamens without filaments, but with enlarged
anthers. This point alone is decisive; but upon the Aqgui-
legia atrata we have often found flowers where the laminz
form their spur by slow degrees. This spur, at first a cavity,
afterwards a canal, then a tube, then at last a cornet, ori-
ginates at the base of the laminz, so that the greater part of
these represent the two lobes of the cornets of the Aquilegia
vulgaris calcarata, which lobes we have shown to be nothing
but the extensions of the two anther-cells. We think, there-
fore, that it is to the anther also that the petaloid lamina is
owing. Ona flower of the Aquilegia atrata we have seen a
well-formed lamina without a trace of spur ; the following one
had a simple protuberance, the third a tube, the fourth a half-
spur, and the fifth an entire spur. Ail this was the result of
a simple elongation of the base of the lamina: now, if this
were not an anther in its nature, it would be difficult to ad-
mit that the filament could produce the same organs as the
anther, and the more so as the facts previously established
prove that the gland represents, as to function, the pollen-
bearing loculus, and the nectar the pollen, whilst the cornet
is really the connective. The filament, when it suffers hyper-
trophy, as is the case in the white lamelle near the carpels,
gives birth to no product ; whilst, on the contrary, the peta-
loid laminz produce a nectary, and subsequently nectar. Or-
ganogeny, morphology, and the metamorphoses, unite then in
leading us to think, that in the stellated Columbine the spurless
petals are modified anthers and not filaments, and capable, as
such, of elongating themselves directly into spur-shaped nec-
taries under many circumstances.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE XI.
Fig. 1—8. Metamorphoses of the stamen into a spur-shaped nectary.
Fig. 8 only is of the natural size; the others are magnified three
times in diameter.
Fig. 2. Stamen at its first period of metamorphosis.
a. Lengthened connective. ce. Anther-cells.
b. Bifid point of the connective. d. Filament.
16 M. Morren on the Nectaries of Aquilegia.
Fig. 3. Stamen still more metamorphosed.
a. A very distinct anther-cell.
b. Rudiment of the second. d. Lamina of the connective.
ce. Connective. e. Sac or beginning of the spur.
Fig. 4. Stamen almost entirely modified.
a. Loculus of the anther. c. Its belly.
b.. Spur-shaped sac. d. Nectarial gland.
e. Lobe, and f. the other lobe of the limb.
Figs. 5. and 6. Ulterior modifications of the stamen, where the nature of the
spur is well determined.
Fig. 6. bis. Spur-shaped nectary, where the staminal nature has left all its
traces.
. and b. Loculi of the anther.
Intermediary part of the connective between the two loculi.
. Lobe of the limb of the nectary.
Marginal extension of the anther-cell.
Fissure of the limb. g. Another lobe of the limb.
) Filament or support of the nectary.
Spur. k. Nectarial gland.
Fig. 7. Stamen where the connectival elongation is the most evident.
Fig. 8. Insertion one within another of the spur-shaped nectaries.
SesHKo ao 8
Fig. 9. One of the lamelle situated between the stamens and the carpels of
the common Columbine.
Fig. 10. Bud of the natural size, in which the formation of the stamens was
observed.
Fig. 11. Androeceum of this bud, considerably magnified.
a. and b. Very young stamens ; their anther alone is visible.
Fig. 12. Stamen of this androeceum separated, greatly magnified.
Figs. 13. and 14. Young petals of this bud (fig. 10).
a. Dise. b. Margin.
c. Prominence indicating the anther-cells.
Fig. 15. A rather larger bud.
Fig. 16. Androeceum and flower of this bud deprived of its calyx.
a, b, c. Petaloid lamine. d. Stamens.
Fig. 17. One of these stamens considerably magnified.
Fig. 18. One of the laminz situated between the stamens and the carpels.
a, b. Traces of the anther-cells.
c. Connective. d. Filament.
Fig. 19. Young petals of this bud (fig. 15).
a. Traces of the anther-cells.
b. Connective. ce. Lamellary margin magnified.
Fig. 20. A much larger bud of the natural size.
Fig. 21. The same stript of its calyx, considerably magnified.
a. Nectaries. b. Their fitting into each other. c. Stamens.
Fig. 22. Portion of the anther-cell dissected for the purpose of seeing its
tissues.
A. Endotheca. Bb. Exotheca.
a. Endothecal cell. b. Its fibre.
Fig. 23. Tissues of the nectarial gland.
a. Exterior cellular tissue. b. Interior cellular tissue.
Mr. Stephens on Fungi of the neiyhbourhood of Bristol. 17
{I.—On the Fungi of the Neighbourhood of Bristol. By Mr.
H. O. SreruHens.
To the Editors of the Magazine and Annals of Natural History.
GENTLEMEN,
Since the publication of my paper on the Mycology of the
neighbourhood of Bristol in the Number of the Annals of
Natural History for December, 1839, vol. iv. p. 246, I have
gathered the following species, a few of which have not been,
I believe, as yet mentioned as British:
Agaricus Clypeolarius, Bull. Flax; Bourton Coomb, Somerset.
Ag. olivaceo-albus, Fries. Leigh Wood.
Ag. pachyphyllus, Berk. Under oak trees, Leigh Wood.
Ag. imbricatus, Fries. Fir plantations, Bourton Coomb.
Ag. blandus, Berk. About way-sides, and in ditches among leaves,
Stapleton, &c.; not an uncommon species.
Ag. inamenus, Fries. Bourton Coomb.
Ag. murinaceus, Bull. Leigh Wood.
Ag. butyracets, Bull. Bourton Coomb.
Ag. confluens, Pers. Woods, common.
Ag. undatus, Berk., Ag. insititius, Fries, Epicrisis Syst. Mycolog.
vol. 1. p. 386, No. 48. Leigh Wood, on the ground in mossy
places.
Ag. ulmarius, Bull. Rather general on elms in the autumn of 1840.
Brunswick Square, Bristol. Redland.
Ag. palmatus, Bull. On a decaying tree, Leigh Wood, growing in
great numbers, tiled one above another, on the upper branches of
the tree. Agreeing with Withering’s description of Agaricus fe-
tidus.
Ag. validus, Berk. Stapleton Wood.
Ag. cinnamomeus, Linn. Leigh Wood, not abundant.
Ag. cinnamomeus, Bolton, tab. 22. This Agaric, though known te
Purton and Withering, seems to be quite a puzzle to our best mo-
dern mycologists. Greville and Berkeley consider it to be a state
of Ag. fastibilis. Having found a few plants under oak trees
in Leigh Wood this autumn, I am enabled to say positively it is
not a state of the last-mentioned plant. I do not draw up a
character at present, because the plants were old. Bolton says
it abounds about Halifax, but I suppose it must be a local spe-
cies, or it would be better discriminated. It must bear the name
of Ag. pseudo-cinnamomeus, given by Nees ab Esenbeck in his
Commentary on Bolton’s Fungusses appended to Willdenow’s
translation of that work.
Ag. bombycinus, Scheff. On an old hawthorn tree, Ashley.
Aq. stipatus, Pers. Ditches, Stapleton, Leigh Wood, not uncommon.
Ag. Candollianus, Fries. In dense clusters where trees had been
felled, Stapleton.
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. C
18 Mr. Stephens on Fungi of the neighbourhood of Bristol.
Ag. papilionaceus, Bull. On dung, Stapleton, &c., not uncommon.
Ag. Boltoni. On cow-dung, Stapleton Wood.
Ag. radicatus, Bolt. On flower-pots in green-houses.
Polyporus armeniacus, Scheff. On decaying branches, Leigh Wood.
Boletus viscidus, Linn. Pileus pulvinate, scrobiculate, dirty yellow-
ish white, copiously covered with slime. Stem scrobiculate
below the ring, above the ring reticulated, the reticulations
formed by imperfect tubes covered with slime, and of the same
colour as the pileus. Flesh dingy white, with a tinge of dirty
yellow; when bruised turning verdigris-green, hence B. erugi-
nascens, Secretan fide Fries. Pores large, adnate, angular,
compound, clay-coloured. The veil is permanent, as in Boletus
Grevillei ; but a portion frequently remains round the edge of the
pileus, forming a shiny web as in the division Limaceum of
Agarics. A species not before detected in Britain.
Hydnum membranaceum, Bull. On sticks, Leigh Wood. Hyd. fim-
briatum, Pers. Ditto.
Hydnum fusco-atrum, Fries, Epicris. Syst. Mycolog. vol. i. p. 515,
No. 66. On decaying wood, Leigh Wood.
Clavaria fusiformis, Sow. Leigh Wood, &c. Not very rare.
Leotia lubrica, Scop. Stapleton Grove. Abundant last autumn.
Peziza granulosa, Schum. Pers. Mycolog. Europ. vol. i. p. 225,
No. 14. On the naked earth in a beech wood, Stapleton, sum-
mer. Not before detected in England.
Pez. echinophila, Bull. Pers. Synop. p. 661, No.97. On decaying
pericarps of the Castanea vesca. Cunnegar, near Dunster, So-
merset. I have likewise received it from Mr. Berkeley.
Pez. claro-flava, Grev. Ona stick, Stapleton Wood.
Pez. furfuracea, Roth. On hazel stumps, Leigh Wood.
Phallus caninus, Hudson. My plants were not inodorous, as stated
by Withering, but detestably foetid. The uteri are frequently
found empty. Leigh Wood.
Nidularia crucibulum and striata. Leigh Wood.
Spheria lateritia, Fries. On the gills of Ag. Necator, Leigh Wood,
this autumn. At first glueing the gills of the Agaric together
with a white substance, in which state it is with difficulty dis-
criminated. The contents cf the perithecia, which are white,
ooze out as in its congener Sph. aurantia, giving the plant the
frosted appearance mentioned by Fries. The juiciness and de-
composition of the parent plant depends upon the original na-
ture of the matrix, for in my specimens the Agaric is dry and
shrivelled.
Sph. fibrosa. On blackthorn, common. Sph. Trifolii, Pers. Ditto.
Sph. aquila, Fries. On rotten sticks, Stapleton. Sph. ovina,
Pers. On decaying stumps, Leigh Wood.
Sph. pulveracea, Ehr. On dry wood, Leigh Wood. Doubtful.
Sph. vagans, var. Rumicis. Everywhere. Sph. (Depazea) Antir-
rhini. Kingsdown.
Phoma circinans, Berk. Species nova, on Yucca gloriosa. Abun-
dant in gardens. This plant was determined by Mr. Berkeley,
Dr. Grundlach on Bats from Cuba. 19
to whom I sent it with an erroneous name. An analogous spe-
cies occurred on Dracena fragrans.
Phacidium Patelle, Tode. On stems of Conium maculatum. Unex-
panded.
Cenococcum geophilum, Fr. Underground, amongst the roots of
Bryum hornum, Stapleton. I have received it from Mr. Berke-
ley.
Stilbum tomentosum, Schrad. On Trichia clavata, Leigh Wood.
Puccinia Glechomatis, DeCand. On ground-ivy, Durdham Down.
Puc. variabilis, Grev. On Leontodon Tararacum, Minehead.
Puc. Lychnidearum, Link. On Lychnis diurna, Stapleton.
Uredo caricina, Schleich. Epidermis ruptured on Luzula sylva-
tica, Stapleton. Uredo Caryophyllacearum, Johnst. On Stel-
laria graminea, Minehead, accompanied by a dark brown Puc-
cinia,
Omitted.—Thelephora arida, Fries. On the bark of oak trees,
Leigh Wood ; it is not confined to the bark, but spreads over
the interior of hollow trunks in wide patches.
Since my first catalogue was published, I have been indebted te
the politeness of Mr. J. E. Gray, of the British Museum, for the use
of the System of Fries, and Sowerby’s Figures, and to Mr. Berkeley
for some corrections. I therefore take this opportunity to rectify
some errors in the former Catalogue :—Cantharellus confluens is a
small, densely crowded variety of Canth. sinuosus, Fries, Helvella flo-
riformis, Sowerby. Thelephora amorpha is doubtful. Spheria in-
cana, mihi, is Sph. coprophila, Fries, Syst. Mycolog. vol. ii. p. 340,
No. 37. It had not previously been detected in England, and there-
fore was not described by any British author.
Henry Oxiey STepHens.
Terrell Street, Bristol, Oct. 15, 1841.
I11.—Description of Four Bats taken in Cuba. By
Dr. GRuNDLACH*,
Vespertitio barbatus, Grundlach. Pale, chestnut-brown, tips of
hair on the upper side darker. Near the muzzle provided with very
short hairs, and defined by a curve of longer hairs extending from
one angle of the mouth to the other, and which at the mouth angle
form a kind of beard. Between the nose and this curve of hairs
there is still a smaller interrupted one on the nasal bridge. Ears
somewhat prolonged to an obtuse point. Tragus at the base narrow,
then expanding, its inner angle curving in a point.
Entire length 2" 3". Length from the tip of the nose to the com-
mencement of the tail 13’, consequently, length of tail 1. Spur
2/", Breadth 6". ‘Thumbs 1’ long.
Found in buildings of the Cafetal St. Antonio el Fundador.
* Communicated and translated by Mr. W. Francis, A.L.S., from Wieg-
mann’s Archiv. 1810. Part IV.
C2
20 Dr. Grundlach on Bats from Cuba.
Nos. 2 and 3 form a new genus*, which I propose to call
Losostoma. Lobed-mouthed. 'The characters are:
Above and below 4 incisors, the upper ones are of unequal size; viz.
in the centre are two large double, and at the sides a small simple
tooth ; and molars not yet examined, as I did not wish to destroy the
only specimen I have as yet taken. Upper margin of the muzzle
very prominent, and forms, with two membranaceous folds at the side
of the nose, a surface directed obliquely downwards, in which the
nostrils are likewise situated. Inferior lip, besides the true lip, has
two membranaceous folds one behind the other: the anterior one
furnished with warts, and the posterior one consisting partly of one
piece, partly divided in the middle. Ears separated. Tail for the
greatest part hidden in the interfemoral membrane, the apex free be-
yond the produced membrane.
LospostomMa cinnumomeum, Grundlach. Above dark, beneath a
light cinnamon-brown. The base of the hairs everywhere fainter.
Face with blacker hairs. Ears short, wide, rounded, at the inferior
margin fringed with hairs, which are likewise perceptible on the
folds in the ears. Tragus short, on the inner side with an incisure.
Nasal ridge bald. Upper lip furnished towards the angles of the
mouth with longer cinnamon-brown hairs, with silky lustre. Ante-
rior lip-leaf somewhat elongate, 4-angular, posteriorly bipartite, each
part with an indentation in the centre. The nose, leaves of the
lower lip, margins of the ear and wings, are blackish brown. ‘The
hairs form a cavity above the nose and beneath the chin.
Length of the entire body 3" 5". Length of body from the point
of the nose to the commencement of the tail 110’. The tail is,
down to where it becomes free, 104", the free portion is 2! in length.
The interfemoral membrane extends from where it becomes free 84!"
further. Spur 82’ long. Breadth 104".
The only specimen was taken flying about in the evening in the
room of the Cafetal St. Antonio el Fundador.
Lozostoma quadridens, Grundlach. Colour of fur pale brown-
ish gray, the tips of the hairs on the upper side darker. About
the throat the colour passes more into yellow. Ear-aperture wide.
Upper margin much elongated to an obtuse point. Above, at the
posterior margin, it is somewhat waved. The lower half of the front
margin is expanded ; the expansion itself forms four little teeth. The
front lip-leaf extends to the angle of the mouth, the hind one is un-
divided and but little shorter than the front one, on which its margin
rests. The warts of the front one are only present in the centre. The
membranaceous folds on the sides of the nose projecting at their
upper margin to a point. Nose above naked. Wings, nose, lip-leaves
and margins of ears blackish brown.
Length of the entire body 1" 63", of the tail in the membrane
* The genus appears to be the same with Gray’s Chilonycteris (Ann.
Nat. Hist. iv. p.4); but the species are undescribed, and differ from Chi.
Mac Leayii, Gr., which was likewise found in Cuba.—Wiegmann.
Sir W. Jardine on the Habits of Lepidosiren annectens. 21
62", without it 34", of the interfemoral membrane from the be-
coming free of the tail 7'”. Of the spur 74'". Expanse of wings 83",
Hab. same as the former.
4. Ruinoroma Carolinense, Geoffr. As, from want of a good
description, I am not certain with regard to the determination, I will
communicate the description of the animal in my possession.
Fur brownish gray. Above darker than beneath. Base of the hairs
whitish. Ears wide, naked, only haired outwardly at the cohesion,
and inwardly in front where the concavity commences. 6—7 warts
on the front margin of the ear. Furnished with longer bristle-hairs
on the nasal bridge, at the toes of the hind feet, and at the anus and
sexual orifice. Lip large, projecting far beyond the inferior lip.
Wings blackish brown. ‘The membrane between the anterior and
posterior legs is, in the vicinity of the body, beset with small tufts of
hairs. The margin of the interfemoral membrane has, in the neigh-
bourhood of the tail, two tooth-like projections, of which the exte-
rior one originates from the end of the spur. Tragus 4-angular,
at its inner margin somewhat sloped. Length of the entire animal
4", of the body from the tip of the nose to the commencement of
the tail 1” 11", of the tail 2" 1"". Usually the tail is inclosed 8’,
and free 5”. Spur 9" long. Breadth 92".
Hab. During daytime, beneath the roofs at Fundador.
1V.—Hore Zoologice. By Sir W. Jarvine, Bart.,
F.R.S.E. & F.L.S., &c.
No. IV. Remarks on the Structure and Habits of Lepidosiren
annectens.
As stated at the commencement of these ‘ Hore,’ and im-
plied by our motto*, we consider them intended to convey
whatever information, whether partial or complete, may come
in our way, and tend to illustrate zoology. The appearance
of Professor Owen’s important and carefully wrought paper
upon Lepidosiren annectens, printed in the last volume of the
Transactions of the Linnzan Society+, had been some time
looked for, and the interest which its perusal excited was still
further heightened by the loan of the other specimens of the
remarkable animal which Mr. Weir discovered on the Gambia,
and which have been kindly trusted for some time in our pos-
session by the sister of that gentleman, now residing in Edin-
burgh. Upon examination of these specimens, some of the
external parts appeared to vary from the figure and descrip-
tion given by Mr. Owen; and as every observation relating to
the structure of an animal so curious must draw out some in-
ference associating with those around it, we shall describe
them minutely. But for the sake of those who may not have
access to the valuable Transactions alluded to, which, through
the various changes incident to scientific societies, especially
* See Annals, vol. iv. p. 160. + Vol. xviii. part 3. p. 327.
22 Sir W. Jardine on the Habits of Lepidosiren annectens.
to such as are now becoming venerable from long duration,
have maintained their standard excellence both im illustra-
tions and in the high character of communications, and also
for the sake of our correspondents in distant countries, it may
be right, first, shortly to run over the history of this singular
genus, and the results at which Mr. Owen has arrived in his
recent examinations.
The genus Lepidosiren was formed by Professor Natterer,
from an animal discovered in the rivers, or rather in the
swamps of South America. Two specimens only were ob-
tained ; the one was found in a swamp on the left bank of the
river Amazon, the other was taken in a pond near Borba, on
the river Madeira, and they were described in the ‘ Annals of
the Museum of Vienna,’ under the generic title above named.
In 1837, specimens of a remarkable animal were brought from
another continent, the vicinity of the river Gambia, in West-
ern Africa, by Thomas C. B. Weir, Esq.; and one of them
being presented to the Royal College of Surgeons in London,
has served Mr. Owen for the account which has Just now
been published*.
In its skeleton the Gambia species is partly osseous, partly
cartilaginous; the bodies of the vertebrae, for instance, are
not ossified. The articular surface of the lower jaw pre-
sents amore complicated structure than is usually observed in
Fishes and Reptiles. The ribs are thirty-six pairs, all simple,
slightly curved slender styles. The tentacles or rudimentary
fins are many-jointed ; the colour of the bones is green, and
altogether it offers a most singular and interesting combina-
tion of the cartilaginous and osseous types. The muscles of
the trunk present all the simplicity and uniformity charac-
teristic of the class of Fishes. There are no pancreatic ceca.
The intestine is traversed throughout by a spiral valve. The
branchiz resemble in form those of the Siren, consisting of
separate elongated filaments, attached only by one extremity
to the branchial arch; but these extremities are fixed directly
to the branchial arch, and not to a common pedicle extended
therefrom, as in the Siren. Viewed with a moderate lens, the
tripinnatifid structure is beautifully seen in each branchial
filament. Thus, although these organs correspond in all es-
sential points with those of the true Fishes, yet the gills ap-
proximate, in their filamentary form, to those of the Perenni-
branchiate Reptiles. The female organs of generation present
* When making out the elaborate Catalogue for the learned body to
which he belongs, the generic name of Protopterus suggested itself, but the
perusal of Dr, Natterer’s paper led him to believe that it was generically
identical,
Sir W. Jardine on the Habits of Lepidosiren annectens. 23
a grade as high as that which characterizes the Plagiostomous
Fishes ; while the elongated form of the ovaria and the con-
voluted disposition of the oviduct resemble more the same
parts in the Avolotl, Amphiuma and Siren.
In all its organs, with a single exception, it is considered
as almost intermediate in structure ; that exception exists in
the organ of smell, a character “ which is absolute in refer-
ence to the distinction of Fishes from Reptiles. In every fish
it is a shut sac, communicating only with the external surface ;
in every reptile it is a canal, with both an external and in-
ternal opening.”
Further, Mr. Owen considers the Lepidosiren as typical of
a new family, and forming a link to connect the higher Car-
tilaginous Fishes with the Sauroid genera Polypterus and Le-
pidosteus ; at the same time, it makes the nearest approach in
the class, to the Perennibranchiate Reptiles.
The specimen which we have examined was in total length
81 inches, and the body was more thickly and decidedly
spotted than that represented in the Linnzan Transactions.
The spots extend as far forward as the origin of the upper fin,
but are continued still further in indistinct cloudings; they take
the form of irregular blotches, and are largest, most distinct,
and in greatest numbers near the caudal extremity ; this may
be a variation incident to the animal, in the same way that the
spottings on various other fishes seldom agree. The caudal
fin or membrane arises gradually from the body, and the
scaling is continued apparently as far as the rays reach ; above
this it becomes like a thin membrane, delicate and trans-
parent, and terminates in a minute and fine point. The whole
appearance in fact of this part is more like that of the mem-
brane which is produced at certain seasons upon some species
of Triton.
The extremities, or fins if they may be so termed, present
some differences when compared with Professor Owen’s figure
and description. They are each regularly barred with brown,
or probably, in a living state, with dark olive. In the descrip-
tion alluded to, “ the pectoral tentacles” are said to be “ some-
what shorter and more slender than the ventral ones; the
former are two inches, the latter two inches four lines in
length*.” In our specimen it is just the reverse: the princi-
pal ray of the pectoral tentacle is attenuated to a thread-like
point, and is 2 inches long; the posterior is only 14ths inch in
length. They also present another discrepancy : the principal
pectoral tentacle is accompanied above by two short and still
more rudimentary members, which do not seem to have been
* P. 320.
24 Sir W. Jardine on the Habits of Lepidosiren annectens.
present in Mr. Owen’s specimen. They are of equal length,
about 3ths of an inch, and are barred as in the other ; but not
being permitted to make any dissection, it has been impossible
to determine whether they were also supported by cartilagi-
nous rays; it is probable that they may not, or that they are
very slight, but their presence seems important, as presenting
a passage even more modified from the true fin composed of
several rays, to the state of a single tentacle destitute of any
palmation or approach to the structure of a more perfect ex-
tremity. The posterior tentacle is single, but is much more
strongly formed than the long ray of the anterior ; it presented
no other differences except in comparative length. Can the
additional pectoral tentacles be a sexual difference ?
The pores and ducts upon the head are disposed nearly as
we have endeavoured to represent them in the woodcut.
They are very large, and supply a large quantity of mucus ne-
cessary for, or at least assisting in, the preservation of the ani-
mal when it has retired from, or is deprived of, its native ele-
ment. Above and in front of the eye they are tortuous and
apparently continuous canals, and run backwards to com-
mence the lateral line; and there is an angular one above
where each nostril is situate, the place of which can easily be
detected by looking with a magnifier at the snout, placed be-
tween the observer and the light.
The progressive motions of this creature we should conceive
to be performed entirely by the caudal or posterior half of the
body, their direction being regulated by the tentacles. We can
fancy them to be very nearly similar to those of the Tritons,
Sir W. Jardine on the Habits of Lepidosiren annectens, 25
which advance by a wriggling or sculling motion of the tail,
and direct themselves by their small anterior members, which
also are used to assist in raising themselves in the water upon
any body or plant, and we should scarcely consider these mem-
bers at all applied or used as organs of touch.
Ifthe structure of this animal is remarkable, so also are some
habits in its ceconomical history, but we have to regret that
our information on these points is still very imperfect. Miss
Weir, in allowing us to examine the specimens of the fish, ac-
companied them with the following note, and a piece of the
hard clay alluded to in the Transactions of the Linnzan So-
ciety *, bearing the impression of the animal as if it had lain for
some time imbedded in it, and with the earth in such a state as
to allow the form of the cast to be retained: “ Fish taken in the
summer of 1835, on the shore of Macarthy’s Island, about 350
miles up the river Gambia. They were found about eighteen
inches below the surface of the ground, which, during nine
months of the year, is perfectly dry and hard, the remaining
three months it is under water. When dug out of the ground
and put into water, the fish immediately unfold themselves
and commence swimming about.” They are dug up with
sharp stakes and are used for food ; the accompanying wood-
cut represents the manner in which they are folded up at the
time they are procured ; it is drawn of the natural size, from
a second specimen preserved i in spirits, which seemed to have
been rolled up in dried leaves, or in the leaves which might
have accumulated at the bottom of the water of the inundated
ground ; several adhered to it, and were kept in their place by
means of a large supply of mucus which still invested the
specimen, and may serve as a provision to assist In preser-
ving life during the torpidity or hybernation of the animal.
Note.—Since writing the above observations, we have per-
used the important paper by M. Bischoff from the translation
published in a late number of the ‘ Annales des Sciences Na-
* Note in vol. xviii, part 3. p. 328.
26 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary
turelles.’. The South American species which is there treated
of seems to be in several points even more nearly allied to the
Cartilaginous Fishes than that from Africa, particularly in
the structure of its almost cartilaginous skeleton, and in the
spiral intestinal valve, which, from additional observations
made by MM. Bibron and Milne Edwards, appeared to be
still more developed than in the L. annectens. But it has
been found to differ from the last, and from Fishes, in an im-
portant particular, that of the heart possessing a double auri-
cle ; and also in the rays of the tentacles being of one piece,
and not jointed. The structure of the nostril we consider as
entirely analogous to that of the organ in Fishes: it is nota
respiratory organ in L. paradova, the double opening is only
similar to the valvular separation of the sac in Fishes, and,
from the structure of the muscles, would seem to act some-
what similarly, and they will cause the passage to resist or pro-
mote the flow of the water through it. The position of the
opening to the lungs or air-bladder is also of importance in
the consideration of this question, and is in favour of its reptile
alliance ; but all the modifications of form must be balanced
with each other, and additional dissections are required of L.
annectens, which it may even yet be found necessary to sepa-
rate and place in Mr. Owen’s proposed genus Protopterus.
V.—Commentary on Mr. G. R. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds,
1840. By H. E. Srrickuanp, Esq., M.A., F.G.S., &c.
[Continued from vol. vi. p. 423.]
P., 26. Tux date of Thunberg’s genus Brachyurus (1743) seems to
bea misprint ; but not knowing in what work it is defined, I am un-
able to rectify it.
Myiophonus ought, I think, to be placed among the Turdine near
Petrocossyphus.
The Rock Thrushes were first defined by Boié in 1822, under the
name of Monticola, and afterwards altered by him in 1826 to Petro-
cossyphus. ‘The former name ought therefore to stand, as authors
ought no more to alter their own generic names when once pub-
lished than those of others. But should there be any insuperable
objection to the name Monticola (of which I am not aware), then the
name Petrocincla, Vig., 1825, has the next claim. Bonaparte di-
vides the Rock Thrushes into two genera, Petrocincla (P. savatilis)
and Petrocossyphus (P. cyaneus). There seems not to be sufficient
ground for this separation ; but if adopted, a new name should be
given to P. cyaneus, because the name Petrocossyphus, Boié, is a
mere synonym of Petrocincla, Vig., and should therefore be can-
celled.
P. 27. Turdus nove-hollandie, Gm., is quoted by Mr. Gray as
on Mr, G. R. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds? 27
the type both of Oreocincla and of Aplonis (p. 40). I cannot at the
moment ascertain to which of these genera this bird really belongs,
having no specimen of it at hand.
The genus Cichla, Wagl., belongs to the Troglodytine, near Meru-
lavis, and its specific name, atricapilla, Lin., should be used instead
of longirostra, Gm.
The name Aipunemia, Sw. (airvs and xvijun) should be written
AEpycnemia.
The genus Malacocercus (not Malacocircus) belongs to the Stur-
nine rather than the Crateropodine. The form and colour of the
bill and legs show a close affinity to Acridotheres. Is not Timalia
Somervillei, Frankl., a synonym of Malacocercus striatus ?
P., 28. It is not easy to say where the genus Icterta should be
classed, but it is clearly out of place among the Crateropodine, which,
when reduced within their natural limits, seem confined exclusively
to the old world.
Tanagra capensis, Sparm., seems to be a synonym of Corvinella
corvina, Shaw (which in that case should be called C. capensis,
Sparm.). Itis certainly not a synonym of Keropia crassirostris.
Mr. Gray seems to have omitted the genus Stenorhynchus, Gould.
(Proc. Zool. Soc. pt. ili. p. 186.)
The genus Mimeta, Vig., cannot, I think, be separated from Orio-
lus. Several modern authors have reunited the two genera.
P. 29. The name Criniger, Tem., 1820, should be used instead of
Trichophorus, 'Tem., which is a later alteration.
The name Hematornis, Sw., 1831, ought not to supersede the
prior name Jzos, Tem. Mr. Swainson, in his ‘ Classif. Birds,’ vol. ii.
p. 24, discards the genus Jzos, Tem., because it is artificial, i.e. it
contains species not naturally allied. This is a reason why it should
be restricted, but not why it should be cancelled; for if this principle
were admitted, we must discard nearly every generic name of Lin-
neus. If then the name /zos be used for this restricted group, the
word Hematornis may be retained for the genus of Falconide so
called by Vigors in December 1831 (Spilornis, Gray).
After a careful study of the genera Querula and Lipangus, I feel
satisfied that this sub-family Queruline should merge into that of
Pyroderine, Gray (Coracine, Sw.), and secondly, that the Pyroderine
should be placed under the family Ampelide instead of Corvide.
Notwithstanding what Mr. Swainson says (Flycatchers, p. 75) as to
Coracina (Pyroderus, Grey) being merely the representative among
the Crows of Querula among the Flycatchers, yet the proportion of
parts and total structure of these two birds are so nearly identical, that
it is almost a question whether they should be even generically se-
parated. Further, on comparing these birds and Lipangus with the
Ampelide, and taking also their geographical range into consideration,
it will, I think, be evident to the untheoretical naturalist that the
family Ampelide is their proper abode. The rictal bristles at first
sight form an objection, but of these we see traces in several genera
of the Ampeline.
28 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary
It is very doubtful whether Lanius nengeta, Lin., can be quoted as
synonymous with Xolmis polyglotta (Spix), mihi. On comparing a
specimen of the latter with Brisson’s description of his Cotinga ci-
nerea (the foundation of Linneus’s Lanius nengeta), taken from Marc-
grave, I find neither the black eye-streak nor the white tail-covers
which are mentioned by Brisson. That author, moreover, omits to
mention the black streak on each side of the chin, and the white ba-
sal spot on the remiges of X. polyglotta.
P.30. Knipolegus should be written Cnipolegus (k not being used
in Latin).
Vieillot’s name climazura being of the same date with Spix’s name
mystacea (not mystax), and the former word being dog-Latin, it is
better to call the bird Fluvicola mystacea, Spix.
The Gubernetes forficatus, Sw., is the Muscicapa yiperu of Lich-
tenstein, not his M. vetula, which last bird is the Milvulus longi-
pennis, Sw., and Muscicapa pullata, Bon., figured in Spix, vol. ii. pl.
18. The type of Gubernetes should therefore be called G. yiperu
(Licht.), unless Vieillot may have given it an earlier name in quoting
Azara.,
The generic name Pitangus, Sw., 1827, should be used instead of
Saurophagus, Sw., 1831.
Mr. Gray has transposed the specific names attached to the ge-
nera Saurophagus and Scaphorhynchus. 'The type of the former ge-
nus is the Lanius sulphuratus, Lin., and of the latter, Lanius pitan-
gua, Lin., both of which are accurately described and figured by
Brisson. Scaphorhynchus pitangua (Lin.) is the Megastoma ruficeps
of Swainson, not his M. flaviceps, as is proved by the words aurantia
and fulva, applied by Briss. and Lin. to the coronal spot.
The name Tyrannus was first used generically by Lacépede in
1799:
It does not appear why Mr. Gray has changed to Myiobius the
name Tyrannula, defined by Mr. Swainson in 1827, and typified by
the Muscicapa barbata, Gm.
P.31. Mr. Gray seems to be justified in imposing his name Pa-
chyrhamphus on the restricted genus Pachyrhynchus of Spix, the lat-
ter name being justly cancelled as a mere synonym of Tityra,
Vieill.
The genuine Lanius cayanus of Lin. and Briss. is not the Psaris
cayanensis of Swainson, but his P. guianensis, distinguished by the
naked lores, and by having two-thirds of the beak red. I can find
no description of Swainson’s P. cayanensis, but I infer that he means
the species with plumed lores, the beak wholly black, and a small
ae spot on the chin (Lanius inquisitor, Olfers, and Licht. Verz.,
p- 50).
ra Platysteira write Platystira (the ec in Greek being made ¢ in
Latin).
P. 32. For Leucocirca write Leucocerca.
The genera Culicivora and Setophaga would be more naturally
placed among the Sylvicoline, as is done by Mr. Swainson, ‘ Classif,
on Mr. G. R. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds, 29
Birds,’ vol. ii. p.58. The length of the legs, the absence of a spu-
rious quill, and the geographical range of these genera show that
they do not belong to the Muscicapine.
The Cryptolopha poiocephala should be called C. ceylonensis, Sw.,
as it had been known as the Platyrhynchus ceylonensis of Sw. ‘ Zool.
Ill.’ nearly twenty years before Mr. Swainson changed its name to
poiocephala.
I cannot but think it injudicious in Mr. Gray to transpose the
names Butalis and Muscicapa, after Boié and Brehm had referred
M. grisola to the former and M. atricapilla to the latter genus, an
arrangement sanctioned by the high authority of Bonaparte.
P. 33. For Leiothrix write Liothriz.
The name Pteruthius of Swainson, to be consistent with etymo-
logy, should be written Ptererythrius (from repo and épvOpo0s) ; but
should it be thought that this is taking too great a liberty with the
original name, we may, at least, venture to write it Pterythrius.
The name Laniisoma, Sw., 1831, should be used instead of Péi-
lochloris, Sw., 1837. Authors should not be encouraged in chan-
ging names, even of their own composition. A father may give his
son what name he pleases at baptism ; but once given, the law very
wisely pronounces that name unalterable.
For Phenicircus write Phenicercus.
For Pipraeidea write Piproidea.
P. 34. Mr. Gray has correctly disentangled a difficulty by re-
storing the name Procnias of Hoffmansegg to the Averanos (Chasma-
rhynchus, Tem.). The fact is, that Vieillot having in 1816 given
the name Tersa to a part of the old genus Procnias, this name ought
to be retained for the remainder (the dveranos); whereas Tem-
minck in 1820 restricted the name Procnias to Vieillot’s genus, and
gave a name of his own to the Averanos.
I may remark in passing, that the genus Tersa appears to connect
the Ampelide directly with the Tanagride.
The name Bombycilla was first used generically by Vieillot, not by
Brisson.
Ptiliogonys, Sw., should be written Ptilogonys.
Cuvier, in his ‘ Rég. An.’ vol.i. p. 363, states that the name Cam-
pephaga, Vieill., was subsequent to his name Ceblepyris, but I am not
aware in what work the latter name was first published. Indeed, I
cannot learn whether Cuvier published any new genera of birds be-
tween 1802, when the first volume of his ‘Comparative Anatomy’
came out, and 1817, when the ‘ Régne Animal’ was published. I
should be obliged by any information on this point.
The groups Campephagine and Dicruriné seem to belong more
naturally to the Laniade than to the Ampelide.
Lanius ferrugineus, Gm., seems to be incorrectly quoted under
Oxynotus ferrugineus, Sw. Latham’s description of L. ferrugineus
exactly agrees with a bird in my collection which is clearly a Dryo-
scopus, Boié ; and instead of the dorsal feathers being ‘‘ very rigid”
as in Oxynotus, they are very soft and downy.
30 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary
The permanent specific name of the Malabar Hdolius should be
paradiseus, Lin., not malabaricus, Gm. It is the Cuculus paradiseus,
Lin., well figured by Brisson, except that one of the fore toes is re-
versed in the figure which led to its being considered a Cuculus.
Mr. Gray has judiciously restored Irena to its place among the
Dicrurine, whereas Mr. Swainson had made it a sub-genus of Oriolus.
The earliest specific name of Corvinella is (Tanagra) capensis,
Sparm. ‘This bird has also received the names of Lanius cissoides,
Vieill., L. flavirostris, Sw., and L. xanthorhynchus of the Munich
Museum.
Collurio not being defined as a genus by Brisson, and the name
moreover having been applied by Vigors to a different genus, it is
better to retain the name Hnneoctonus of Boié, who was the first to
separate this group generically from the true Shrikes.
P. 36. Cyclarhis should be written Cyclorhis (kvxXos and pis).
The type of Telophonus should be called T. senegalus (Lin.). It
is the Lanius senegalus, Lin., and the L. erythropterus of Shaw, not
of Linneus.
Nilaus capensis should be called N. brubru, Lath., 1801.
Vanga was first used as a Latin generic name by Vieillot, not by
Buffon.
P. 37. The genus Cracticus, Vieill. (restr.), ought certainly to
enter into the sub-family of Gymnorhinine ; for though the hooked
beak shows an affinity to the Shrikes, yet the majority of its cha-
racters and the geographical range show a strong preponderance in
favour of its alliance with Gymnorhina, Gray.
Pica colliei, as described by Vigors in the ‘ Zool. Journ.’ vol. iv., can
hardly be the same as Cyanurus bullockii. Mr. Vigors’s bird has the
throat black instead of white, and its dimensions differ from those
given to C. bullockii by Wagler. Mr. Gray must also be wrong in
quoting Garrulus uliramarinus, Bon., under Cyanurus bullockii, as
Bonaparte, in his Osservazioni sulla 24 ed. Cuv. Reg. An. p. 84,
says that it is synonymous with Pica sieberi, Wagl., and Garrulus
sordidus, Sw.
Is not the name Dysornithia, Sw., prior to Perisoreus, Bon. ?
P. 38. For Crypsirina write Crypsirhina.. ‘To the synonyms of
C. varians add Colius viridis, Lath.
P. 39. Gymnoderus nudus, Gm., is the Gracula fetida, Lin., and
the latter specific name therefore has the priority.
Is not Buffon’s Pl. Enl. 268. the smaller species of Gracula (Hu-
labes indicus, Cuv.), and not the G. religiosa, as Mr. Gray makes it ?
I should prefer placing the Graculine among the Sturnide, near
Pastor, to which group they seem much allied in structure.
The genus Pyrrhocorar was first defined by Vieillot, not by Bris-
son.
To the synonyms of Corcorar add < Pyrrhocorax, Tem.
P.40. Megalopterus, Smith, must be changed, the name being
pre-occupied by Boié for a genus of Sternine.
If the Acridotheres roseus be generically separated from the rest of
on Mr. G. R. Gray’s ‘ Genera of Birds’ 31
that genus, it should bear the name of Psaroides of Vieillot, who
was the first to point out the distinction, and Temminck’s name
Pastor should be cancelled, being a mere synonym of Acridotheres.
P.41. The genus Creadion surely belongs to the Meliphagide. Is
it not identical with Neomorpha, Gould?
The name Sturnella ludoviciana, Lin., is preferable to S. magna,
Lin., the latter name being comparative, and only correct when
the bird was classed as an Alauda. Besides, the name Judoviciana is
adopted by Latham, Richardson, Bonaparte, &c.
The genera Sturnella and Amblyrhamphus (not Amblyrhynchus), if
carefully examined, will be found to belong to the Icterine rather
than to the Sturnine. When thus arranged, the whole of the Stur-
niné wiil be confined to the old world, and the /cterine to the new,
thus adding to the numerous instances in which geographical distri-
bution coincides with natural affinities. In the same way I believe it
will be found that the characters of Astrapia refer it to the oriental
group Lamprotornine, rather than to the American one Quiscaline,
in which Mr. Gray places it.
Is not Vieillot’s name Quiscalus versicolor, prior to that of Q. pur-
pureus, Licht. ?
Lesson quotes Corvus mexicanus, Gm. (and not Oriolus, as Mr.
Gray has it,) as the type of his genus Cassidiz.
The confusion which overhangs several of the black Icterine birds
of America is very great, but this is not the place to discuss the en-
tire question. I will therefore merely state that, as far as my inves-
tigations go, the Cassidix meaxicanus, Less. (which, however, is not
the Corvus mexicanus, Gm.) is identical with the Scaphidura barita,
Sw. If so, the names Cassidix and Scaphidura being of equal date,
we may be allowed to retain the latter, and expunge the mongrel
word Cassidix. To the Scaphidura barita, Sw., I also refer Cassicus
niger, Vieill., Gal. Ois. 89. (which, however, is not the Oriolus ni-
ger, Gm.). Also note that Scaphidura barita, Sw., is neither Gra-
cula barita, Lin., nor Gracula barita, Lath., Syn. pl. 18, Gen. Hist.
pl. 44. The Corvus mevicanus, Gm., is, I have no doubt, synonymous
with Quiscalus macrurus, Sw. (See Fernandez’s description of his
Hocitzanatl quoted by Ray and Brisson.) The Oriolus niger of
Gmelin, described by Brisson to be under ten inches in length, is a
distinct species found in the West Indies, and called Quiscalus ba-
ritus by Bonaparte. It is, perhaps, the same as Quiscalus crassi-
rostris, Sw. The Gracula barita of Linneus (excluding his quota-
tion of Brisson) seems to be known only from his description, and
is not the same with Oriolus niger, Gm. The Gracula barita of La-
tham, Syn. pl. 18, Gen. Hist. pl. 44, is stated by Bonaparte in his
‘ American Ornithology’ to be identical with Quiscalus versicolor, an
opinion in which I concur.
Cassicus and Xanthornus were first used as genera, not by Brisson,
but by Lacépéde in 1799.
P. 42. The genus Euplectes was first defined by Swainson in 1830
(Zool. Ill. ser. 2.), with HE. oriz, Lin., for its type. Is not this
prior to the name Pyromelana. Bon. ?
32 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary
Should not the name Phileterus socius, Lath., be used instead of
P. lepidus, Smith?
The restricted genus Ploceus, Cuv., if Lovia philippina, Gm., be
considered its type, will contain the greater part of the genus Eu-
plectes, Sw.
P. 43. The genus Symplectes, Sw., seems to have a fair claim to
generic distinctien, a conclusion to which Sir W. Jardine arrived in-
dependently of Mr. Swainson, when he gave it the name of Eupodes.
Mr. Swainson’s name, however, was published first, and must there-
fore be retained.
It appears to me that the genera Spermospiza, Pyrenestes, Vidua,
Estrelda, Amadina, Spermestes, and Erythrura, ought all to be in-
cluded in the sub-family Ploceine. Though the varying development
of their beak presents analogies to the Coccothraustine and Fringil-
line, yet their true affinity to Ploceine is indicated by their pecu-
liarly elevated culmen extending backwards on the forehead, their
naked nostrils, their geographical extent, and especially by the spu-
riousness of their first primary quill, a character often of great va-
lue as an index of affinity. Moreover, the genus Vidua is directly
united to Ploceus by means of V. chrysoptera, Vieill., and Ploceus
capensis, Lin.
The Tanagrine would be better placed at the end of Fringillide, so
as not to separate the Coccothraustine from the Fringilline.
There is much confusion in the synonyms of Tanagra episcopus,
but Mr. Gray is probably right in quoting Pl. Enl. 178. The ori-
ginal T. episcopus of Linnzus and Brisson seems to be the 7. seri-
coptera of Swainson and the T. celestis of Spix. It is probably also
the Gracula glauca of Sparrman, though that bird is said to be seven
inches long. The T. episcopus of Swainson’s Birds of Brazil, pl. 39,
seems (judging from the figure) to be only the young of his 7. cana,
pl. 37. The T. celestis, Sw., Birds Braz. pl. 41, is very different
from T. celestis, Spix, as the wing-covers are green. It is possibly
the female of 7. cana, Sw.
There is no doubt that Tanagrella multicolor, Sw., is the Motacilla
velia, Lin., and the latter specific name should therefore be used.
P.45. On comparing a specimen of Leucopygia ruficollis with
Lesson’s very short description of his Cypsnagra hirundinacea, there
can be no doubt of their belonging to the same genus; but as Lesson
describes his bird as blue-black above, and says nothing of the white
on the rump and wing-covers, I think they cannot be specifically
synonymous. I would fain for once break through the law of pri-
ority in order to get rid of the intolerable name of Cypsnagra, Less.,
a word compounded more Gallico out of Cypselus and Tanagra!
Is not Emberiza quadricolor, Gm., an earlier synonym of Ery-
thrura prasina (Sparm.) ?
Mr. Gray seems to have omitted the genus Pytelia, Sw., type,
P. elegans, Gm., Vieill. Gal. pl. 64.
P. 46. I do not think it advisable to change the name Pyrgita,
Cuv., to that of Passer, “ Ray.” Ray does not define Passer as a
genus, but merely applies it to designate the House Sparrow in com-
on Mr. G. R. Gray’s * Genera of Birds? 33
mon with many other birds to which it has no affinity. The Spar-
rows were first defined as a genus by Cuvier, who gave them the name
by which the ancient Greeks designated them.
To the synonymes of Montifringilla add Chionospiza, Kaup.
Ammodramus should be written Ammodromus.
P. 47. It does not appear why the name Melophus cristata (Vig.)
is changed to M. lathami, Gray. I see no objection to cristata, but
if there be any, Sir W. Jardine’s name erythropterus should be
adopted.
The name Cynchramus was first used generically, I believe, by Bo-
naparte.
P. 48. Agrodroma rufescens, Tem., should be called A. campestris,
Bechst.
P.49. The family Musophagide, as here constituted, is a very arti-
ficial group. The genus Phytotoma should certainly be placed next
to, if not in, the sub-family Tanagrine. Its beak approaches in form
near that of Spindalis, Jard., and the dentations of the margin,
though very peculiar, have a distant counterpart in the beak of
Euphone. Its South American habitat also favours this view of ar-
rangement.
The Coliine certainly seem to form a caput mortuum, which no
analysis has yet been able to bring within the limits cf any other
family of Conirostres. ‘They may therefore be raised to the rank of
a family with the title of Colude.
The sub-family Musophagine ought, I conceive, to be placed in the
family Cuculide. It decidedly belongs to the Scansores, for live spe-
cimens of Turaco invariably perch with two toes behind the branch.
In the structure of their beak and legs they show considerable affinity
to the Cuculide, especially to the genera Phenicopheus and Croto-
phaga. It will be recollected too that the Cuculide genus Sauro-
thera has the bill dentated.
Mr. Gray is quite correct in quoting Edwards, pl. 7, under Turaco
persa (Lin.). The descriptions of Cuculus persa given by Linneus
and Brisson are taken from Edwards, and are based on the very rare
species with a green crest margined with red (C. buffoni of Swainson,
but not of Vieillot nor of Jardine, which is the purpureus, Less., and
senegalensis, Sw.). There is a specimen of the true T. persa in Lord
Derby’s collection. The name persa is commonly but erroneously
given to the species with a green crest margined with white. This
species has never received a distinct appellation, and I therefore re-
commend that it be called T. albocristatus. Stephens’s name afri-
canus cannot be correctly used for it, for his description is inappli-
cable to any known species, and is a mélange of the descriptions of
T. albocristatus and T. persa.
P.50. According to the Jaws of Latinity, Tockus should be written
Toccus, and Ramphastos, Rhamphastos.
The genus Scythrops, though it reminds us at first sight of the
Rhamphastide, yet is much more nearly allied to the Cuculide, as
shown by the position of the nostrils, the red space round the eyes,
the form of the wings and feet, and the geographical habitat. Pha-
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. D
34 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary
nicopheus forms its nearest affinity, but in the pointed wings and co-
lour of the plumage it approaches Cuculus.
P.51. The group Psittacara, as defined by Vigors in the Zool.
Journ, vol. ii., seems sufficiently distinguishable from Conurus, Kuhl,
to be retained as a genus.
For Centrourus write Centrurus. Mr. Gray has mistaken the type
of this genus as defined by Swainson, which is the Nestor meridio-
nalis (Gm.) (N. hypopolius, Wagl., Psittacus australis, Shaw,
Mus. Lev. 87); consequently Centrourus, Sw., merges into a syno-
nyme of Nestor, Wagl. The Psittacus australis of Latham (P. con-
cinnus, Shaw) is hardly to be distinguished generically from Tricho-
glossus, but if made distinct, will require a new name.
P. 52. The specific name of Psittacodis should be paraguanus,
Gm., not parugua, Marcgrave, the latter name being antecedent to
the system of binomial nomenclature.
For Poiocephalus write Peocephalus, the o. in Greek becoming @
in Latin and e in English. (Hence the term poikilitic, lately intro-
duced in Geology, should be written pecilitic, as we write economy
and not oikonomy.)
Mr. Gray seems to have omitted a genus of Loriine which wants
a name. It is the Psittaculus of Swainson, and is typified by P. ver-
nalis, galgulus, and rubrifrons.
P.53. Mr. Gray very properly restores the name Agapornis,
Selby, to its true type, from which Mr. Swainson had removed it
and applied it to the American group Psittacula.
The name Psittacula sbould be quoted on the authority of Brisson,
not of Kuhl. Brisson divides the genus Psiétacus into six subgenera,
which, being based on definitions, may be retained on Brisson’s au-
thority. These are Ara, Cacatua, Lorius, Psittacus, Psittauca, and
Psittacula. ‘The name Psittaca, however, being too near in sound
to Psittacus, is not retained.
Pl. Enl. 455. f.1, quoted by Mr. Gray under Psiftacula passerina,
is the basis of P. capensis, Gm., so named from a mistake in the
habitat. ‘This bird is named guianensis by Mr. Swainson, who con-
siders it distinct from passerinus, Lin., which he calls cyanopterus.
The chief distinction is that the guianensis, Sw. (capensis, Gm.), has
the, punp green, while in the passerinus, Lin. (cyanopterus, Sw.), it
is blue.
The bird figured in Phillips, Voy. Bot. Bay, p. 267, pl. 40, is not
the Calyptorhynchus banksii (Lath.), but the C. cookii (Tem.).
The name Corydon, Wagl., cannot stand, as it was pre-occupied in
1828 by Lesson (Man. Orn. vol. i. p. 177). A new name will
therefore be wanted for Corydon, Wag].
Psittacus nestor was, I believe, never published by Forster under
the name of hypopolius, consequently the name meridionalis, Sm.,
has the priority.
The sub-families composing the family Picide, as arranged by Mr.
Gray, are not of equivalent value. The Bucconine, Picumnine and
Yuncine torm three groups apparently of equal value, and the Wood-
peckers form a fourth ; but the Picine, Dryocopine, Celeine and Co-
on Mr. G. R. Gray’s * Genera of Birds, 35
laptine are only subdivisions of the group Woodpeckers. These last
should therefore bei unted into one sub-family Picine, or, if divided,
they should form groups of a lower denomination than a sub-family.
P.54. Mr. Gray is quite right in keeping the name Picumnus,
Tem., for the American group (Asthenurus, Sw.), because Tem-
minck evidently regarded this as the type of his genus, making it
the first division, and giving the name abnormis to the Asiatic group
(Picumnus, Sw., Microcolaptes, Gray).
Mr. Gray quotes Rich. Faun. Bor. Am. pl. 56. for Picoides tri-
dactylus (Gm.), but Richardson’s bird is the P. hirsutus (Vieill.),
which Bonaparte considers as distinct from the European P. tridac-
tylus.
feinsedeous should be written Hemicercus.
It does not appear why a new name is given to the genus Dendro-
copus, proposed by Boié and sanctioned by Bonaparte, the name Den-
drocopus, Vieill., being superseded by Dendrocolapies.
The name Dendromus is pre-occupied for a genus of Mammalia by
Dr. Smith in Zool. Journ. vol. iv. p. 438.
Mr. Gray seems to unite the American Dryotomi of Swainson
with the European group Dryocopus, Boié (D. martius), and indeed
they cap hardly be distinguished in structure, though Bonaparte
keeps them separate.
P. 55, The name Tiga, Kaup., 1836 (Thierreich, vol. ii. p. 37),
must supersede Chrysonotus, Sw., 1837. The species will then stand
as Tiga tridactyla (Sw.).
After the Green Woodpeckers have been distinguished as Gecinus,
Boié, Swainson’s genus Brachylophus still includes two well-marked
groups : first, the Short-thumbed Woodpeckers closely allied to Tiga,
containing 1. P. aurantius, Lin. (P. bengalensis, Gm.) ; 2. P. goen-
sis, Gm.; 3. P. philippinarum, Lath.; 4. P. hematribon, Wagl.,
and 5. P. erythronotus, Vieill. To this group I would propose the
name BracHyprERNus. The remaining group contains the Crimson
Woodpeckers, P. miniatus and puniceus. I am not aware whether
Boié includes these species in his genus Gecinus ; but if not, they may
retain the restricted name Brachylophus, Sw., which in that case,
not being precisely equivalent to Gecinus, Boié, would escape obli-
teration as a synonyme.
It is not easy to decide which of the specific names of Geococcyr
bas the priority. Mr. Swainson states (Classif. Birds, vol. ii. pp.
140, 325), that he named it longicauda in the Catalogue of Bullock’s
Mexican Museum in 1824. If, however, it was merely named at that
time and not described, the name cannot be considered to have ac-
quired a right of priority, as the slovenly practice of merely reciting
the names of new species without defining their characters (for many
examples of which see Lesson’s Traité d’Ornithologie) cannot be
too much discouraged, as it only tends to choke up the science with
synonymes. It does not appear whether Blainville ever published
this species under the name of Saurothera botte, and therefore the
name californiana used by Lesson in his Supplement to Buffon some
2
36 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary
time previously to 1831, will probably turn out to have the prior
claim to all others.
P. 56. The Centropus egyptius (Gm.) seems to be the same as
C. senegalensis (Lin.), which latter name will therefore prevail.
The name Coua, Levaill., was, I believe, never used as a Latin
word, and therefore ought not to supersede Serisomus, Sw.
The Cuculus guira, Gm., distinguished by having only eight
feathers in the tail, ought surely to be generically separated from the
« four-winged Cuckoos”’ (Diplopterus, Boié). The former constitutes
the group Guwira, Less., 1851, of which Octopteryr, Kaup., 1836, and
Ptiloleptus, Sw., 1837, are synonymes. The type will stand as
Guira piriragua (Vieill.), Cuculus guira, Gm., Ptiloleptus cristatus,
Sw.
P. 57. Should not Ptilonopus be written Ptilopus? (from mrihov
and zovs).
Is Treron, Vieill., prior to Vinago, Cuv.? Cuvier says of the latter
name, “ Vieillot has changed it to Treron.”
P. 58. Turtur was first used as a generic name by Mr. Selby in
1835.
The name of the first genus of Gourine should be altered from
Peristera, Sw., to Phaps, Selby, and the second from Leptoptila,
Sw., to Peristera, Sw. In 1827 Mr. Swainson defined an American
group as Peristera, and in 1835 Mr. Selby defined an Australian
group as Phaps. So far all was well; but in 1837 Mr. Swainson
thought proper to transfer his name Peristera to the Phaps of Selby,
and to give anew name, Leptoptila (misspelt Leptotila), to the genus
which he had previously called Peristera. It behoves the advocates
of the priority principle to discountenance such wanton changes by
bringing back these genera to their original designations.
The specific name jamaicensis, Lin., should supersede rufavilla,
Wagil.
P. 59. I see no reason why the name Geophilus, Selby (restr.)_
should not be retained for the Columba nicobarica, as Dr. Fleming
did not include it in his genus Verrulia, and consequently Geophilus
is not the precise equivalent of Verrulia.
To the synonymes of Gowra, Flem., add Megapelia, Kaup.
Chamapetes should be written Chamepetes.
If Mitu be retained as a generic name, it should be Latinized into
Mitua. Lesson is, I believe, the first author who attached the name
of Mitu toa genus, and it should therefore be quoted on his autho-
rity, not on Marcgrave’s.
P. 60. Syrmaticus reevesi ought to bear the name of S. superbus
(Lin.). There can be no doubt that this is the species intended by
Linnezus, though his description of his Phastanus superbus, taken from
Chinese documents, is by no means accurate. We have the autho-
rity of Temminck and Sir W. Jardine for this identification.
To the synonymes of Huplocomus add Spicifer, Kaup.,. 1836.
The Impeyan Pheasant is the true type of Lophophorus, Tem.,
1818, and this name should therefore supersede Monaulus, Vieill.
on Mr. G. R. Gray’s * Genera of Birds.’ 37
The Phasianus leucomelas, Lath., if generically distinct, must have a
new generic name.
It is not correct to quote Lophyrus, Steph., as a synonyme of Lo-
phophorus, the word Lophyrus being merely a mistake of the artist
who engraved Stephens’s plate 36, vol. xiv.
P.61. Francolinus was first defined as a genus by Stephens,
TS19.
It is to be regretted that the legitimate name Arboricola had not
occurred to Mr. Hodgson instead of the hybrid word Arborophila,
but it is too late to change it.
Coturnix was first used generically by Cuvier about 1802.
For Ptilophachus write Ptilopachys.
The name Cryptonyx, Tem., 1815, is prior to Liponyxr, Vieill.,
1816.
P. 62. Brisson does not use Bonasa to designate a genus, and the
name Bonasia, Bon., may therefore be retained.
P. 63. The Turnicine would range more naturally among the Te-
traonide than among the Tinamide.
For Rhyncotus read Rhynchotus.
P. 64. The family Charadriade ought to be in contact with Sco-
lopacide, although most modern authors interpose the Ardeide be-
tween them.
It is very doubtful whether Gdicnemus magnirostris, Tem., Pl.
Col. 387, can be correctly quoted as the type of Burhinus, Il. La-
tham described a bird under the name of Charadrius magnirostris,
“« the size of the Golden Plover, bill stout and very broad, resembling
the Tody genus.” From this description Iliger founded his genus
Burhinus. Wager, in his monograph of Charadrius, quotes Latham’s
description, and places it among his ‘‘ species 4 me non visz.”’
He also describes as a distinct species the (idicnemus magnirostris,
Tem., under the name of Charadrius magnirostris. This bird is de-
scribed as from 17 to 20 inches long, with the beak much longer,
stronger and more compressed than the other Gidicnemi, and it seems
therefore quite distinct from C. magnirostris, Lath. Lesson, however,
unites the two in his genus Burhinus, and in order to admit Tem-
minck’s bird he greatly modifies the original definition of that genus ;
for instead of the ‘‘ Rostrum latum, depressum’’ of Illiger, we find in
Lesson ‘‘ bec trés comprimé sur les cétés.”’ It would seem then that
the true Burhinus of Illiger, if such a bird really exists, has yet to
be discovered, and that a new generic name is wanted for the Gidic-
nemus magnirostris of ‘Temminck.
To the synonymes of Ortygodes, Vieill., add Ortyzelos, Vieill.
The Hemipodius nivosus, Sw., has the neck and breast ferruginous
with white spots, and is therefore perhaps distinct from Ortygodes
meiffrent.
The earliest specific name of Pluvianus melanocephalus (Gm.), is
P. egyptius (Lin.).
P. 65. The specific name of Squatarola, viz. cinerea, Ray, ought
not (for reasons above given) to supersede Linnzeus’s name helvetica.
Lesson, in his Traité d’Ornithologie, has made it almost certain
yy
38 Mr. Strickland’s Commentary
that the Corrira italica, Gm., is the Dromas ardeola, Paykull; but as
long as any doubt remains, it is better to retain the latter name as
Mr. Gray has done.
P.66. The four genera, Egretta, Ardeola, Botaurus and Nyctico-
raz, originated, not with Brisson, but the two first with Bonaparte,
and the two last with Stephens.
For Tigrisoma lineata read T. lineatum. (All words ending with
soma, stoma, &c., are neuter.)
Ought not the genus Herodias, Boié, as restricted by Bonaparte,
to be kept distinct from Egretta?
P.67. For Leptoptilos write Leptoptilus. (The terminal os in
Greek is always made us in correct Latin.)
The specific name arga/a is Latham’s, not Gmelin’s; but as Gmelin’s
name dubia, though prior, implies an erroneous proposition, for the
species is not dubious, Latham’s name may be allowed to stand.
The genus /éis was founded, not by Brisson, but by Lacepéde.
The genus Falcinellus, attributed to “‘ Ray,” is, I believe, now first
established by Mr. Gray. If retained, a new specific name will be
wanted for the European bird, as Colonel Sykes is of opinion (Proc.
Com. Zool. Soc. pt. ii. p. 161) that the Tantalus igneus, Gm., is
distinct from T. falcinellus, Lin. It would, however, be far better
to give a new name to this genus, if a genus it be, the name Falci-
nellus being pre-occupied by Cuvier, who asserts that Vieillot changed
it to Erolia.
P.68. The genus Numenius, ‘“‘ Ray,’’ was founded by Latham.
Limosa, “ Briss.,”’ was first used generically, I believe, by Leisler,
and Totanus, ‘‘ Ray,” by Cuvier, 1802.
The name Guinetta, ‘‘ Briss.,” is now first used generically by Mr.
Gray, and therefore should not supersede Actitis, Ill., as restricted
by Boié.
P.69. For Macroramphus write Macrorhamphus.
P.70. I have been quite unable to reduce the synonymes of the
genus Rhynchea into order, and Mr. Gray would do a good work if
he would publish a monograph of this genus with all the synonymes
at full length, and with the distinctive characters of the species.
Mr. Gray must be in error when he unites the Scolopax paludosa,
Gm. (S. undulata, Bodd.) with S. sabini, Vig. Bonaparte, in his
elaborate monograph of the genus Scolopax, in the ‘ Osserv. Cuv.
Rég. An.’ p. 123, describes S. paludosa, Gm., as having the beak
33 inches long, and the lateral rectrices ‘‘ angustissimi, acuminati,”’
characters which do not apply to S. sabini, which Bonaparte there
calls (after Vieillot) S. sakhalina.
I cannot approve of separating Scolopar gallinula, Lin., generi-
cally from the other Snipes ; but those who do so should retain the
name Gallinago (founded by Stephens) for the true Snipes, and call
the S. gallinula, Philolimnus, Boié. At any rate, the specific name
gallinula, Lin., should not be superseded by a term used previously
to the binomial System.
The specific name /obatus, Wils., should not be given to Stegano-
pus, because it was used by Wilson under the erroneous impression
on Mr. G. R. Gray’s § Genera of Birds, 39
that this bird was the Tringa lobata, Gm. The specific name wil-
soni, Sab., seems to be next in priority, and should therefore stand.
Is Steganopus, Vieill., prior to Holopodius, Bon. ?
The family Palamedeide will probably require to be remodelled.
Although not prepared to go into details at present, I think it pro-
bable that the Parrine and Palamedeine would be better arranged
under Rallide, and Megapodine divided between the Turdide and the
Cracide.
P.71. The earliest specific name of Menura, is superba, given by
Davies in the Linnean ‘Transactions in 1800.
The term Ortygometra, or ‘‘ Mother of the Quails,’’ was an old
name applied by Aristotle, Aldrovandus, Ray and Brisson to the
Corn Crake; therefore, when Bechstein divided these short-beaked
Rails from the rest of the genus Radlus, no term could have been
more appropriate; but unfortunately he neglected to use it, and
preferred the term Crer. Now as Bechstein was the first to define
the genus, the name Crer must be retained, and Ortygometra can-
celled, since it would not be correct to retain the latter (as Bona-
parte does) for the remaining group (Porzana, Vieill.), in which the
Corn Crake is not included.
The name Ocydromus australis (Sparm.) has the priority of pub-
lication over O. troglodytes, Gm.
P.72. The genus Gallinula was founded by Latham.
The Heliornine would, I think, enter more naturally among the
Colymbide than among the Raillide, though they certainly connect the
two groups.
The Phenicopterine ought not to be included in the Anatide.
They surely form too marked a group to be placed on a par with the
subdivisions of Linnzeus’s genus dnas. They should rather be made
into a distinct family, and be placed near the Ardeade, to some
of which (Platalea and Ibis) they show an affinity in the scarlet
plumage, a colour wholly unknown among the Anatide.
P.73. Chlephaga should be written Chloéphaga.
The genus Bernicla, ‘“ Briss.,’”’ was founded by Stephens, 1824,
and Cygnus, “ Briss.,’”’ by Vieillot, 1816.
P. 74. Querquedula owes its foundation as a genus to Stephens,
1826.
To the synonymes of Micropterus cinereus add Oidemia patachonica,
King.
Oidemia should be written Gdemia. Add to its synonymes Ma-
ceranas, Less.
To the synonymes of Somateria add Platypus, Brehm.
The genera Fuligula and Harelda were first published by Ste-
phens, 1824.
For Kamptorhynchus write Camptorhynchus.
P.76. The Mergide should not be regarded as a distinct family
from the Anatide ; they are only narrow-beaked Ducks, forming a
subfamily allied to Fuliguline.
For Podicepsine write Podicipine.
It surely savours of hypercriticism to divide the Little Grebes
(Sylbeocyclus, Bon.) from Podiceps.
40 Mr. Strickland on Gray’s Genera of Birds.
P.77. The generic name Catarrhactes, Briss., should be used in-
stead of Hudyptes, Vieill., and the specific name demersus, Lin., in-
stead of chrysocome, Forst. ‘This genus Catarrhactes of Brisson is
prior in date to Brunnich’s genus, which he called Catarrhacta
(Lestris, Ill. restr.).
The genus Mergulus was first defined by Vieillot, 1816.
An h should be inserted after the r in Synthliboramphus and Pty-
choramphus.
P.78. Wagellus, “Ray,” is now first introduced as a genus by
Mr. Gray, and therefore should not supersede Fulmarus, Leach.
The name Catarrhacta, Brunn., being too near Catarrhactes, Briss.,
should give way to Lestris, Ill.
P. 79. Chroicocephalus should be written Chrecocephalus.
The name Gygis alba (Sparr.) is prior in date of publication to G.
candida (Forst.).
The true type of Viralva, Leach, as exhibited by Stephens, is the
Black Tern (Sterna nigra, Lin.). Therefore Boié’s name Gelocheli-
don should be retained for the genus which contains Sterna an-
glica, Mont., and the name Viralva (first published in 1825) sinks
into a synonyme of Hydrochelidon, Boié, 1822, which is typified by
S. nigra, Lin. Also note that dnous, Leach, is synonymous with
Megalopterus, Boié, and not with Hydrochelidon, Boié, and that
Anous niger, Leach, is synonymous, not with Sterna nigra, Lin., but
with Megalopterus stolidus (Lin.), Boié.
The genera Thalasseus, Boié, Gygis, Wagl., Sternula, Boié, and
Hydrochelidon, Boié, appear not to possess structural characters suf-
ficient to entitle them to generic separation from Sterna.
P. 80. The genera Sula and Fregata were first raised to that rank
by Lacepéde in 1799.
In concluding this Commentary an apology is due for the length
to which it has extended, but I felt it impossible to do justice to Mr.
Gray’s book without going into considerable detail. I should be
sorry if any person should be led by the number of these criticisms
to form an unfavourable idea of the general accuracy of the work.
A large proportion of the above remarks rest on questions of opinion,
in which Mr. Gray is perhaps as likely to be right as I am; and
even where I have detected errors, they are only such as are un-
avoidable in the first edition of a work in which so much labour and
research is compressed into so small a compass. I conclude there-
fore with most heartily recommending the ‘ Genera of Birds’ to the
favourable notice of zoologists.
Postcripr.—l beg to add one or two remarks which have oc-
curred to me since this Commentary went to press.
Page | of Mr. Gray’s book. In my remarks on the Vulturine I
had not noticed that Temminck has proved the Hgypius of Savigny
to be only the young of the Vultur auricularis, Daud. (See Tem.
Man. Orn. part iv. p.586.) Therefore the generic name Agypius
should be given to the group containing V. auricularis and pondice-
rianus.
P. 4. Asturina cinerea, Vieill., is said by Cuvier to be the same as
Falco nitidus, Tem., Pl. Col. 87. If this be the case, Asturina might
On Mr. Swainson’s Views of Natural Arrangement. 41
stand as a distinct genus, being quite different from Cymindis. (N.B.
Temminck’s Pl. Col. 87. can hardly be the F. nitidus of Latham,
whose expression ‘‘ legs long,’ agrees better with the F’. hemidacty-
lus, Tem. Pl. Col. 3.)
The genus Astur was founded by Lacepéde in 1799, and is there-
fore clearly prior to Dedalion, Sav.
VI.— Mr. SuucKkarp on his falsely alleged participation in
Mr. Swainson’s views of Natural Arrangement.
To the Editors of the Annals and Magazine of Natural History.
GENTLEMEN,
I apPEAL to you to do me justice against the impression that
may be made by what professes to be an “ Analytical notice
of the 129th volume of Lardner’s Cabinet Cyclopedia, enti-
tled, ‘ On the History and Natural Arrangement of Insects,’
by [William Swainson, F.R.S., &c., and W. E. Shuckard,
Libr. R.S., &c., published in the 3rd Number of ‘ The Ento-
mologist,’ written by Mr. Newman.”
In an advertisement prefixed to this volume of Lardner,
dated from my residence, and of course emanating from me,
I said, “Those paragraphs in this volume with the initials
“ IV. E. Sh. are written by Mr. Shuckard, and where several
“of these follow each other they are affixed to the last only ;
“but the system of classification is exclusively Mr. Swain-
“son’s.” Now, notwithstanding this, which it will be seen
below that the *‘ Analyst’? was aware of, he says in the first
page of his notice*, “ I will now endeavour to show the views
* entertained by Messrs. Swainson and Shuckard on the sub-
“ject:” thus clearly identifyimg me with the whole scheme,
for following this is given the dry systematic frame of the
work. He then says, “A glance at this arrangement will
* convince the reader that no charge of plagiarism can possi-
“bly be brought against its authors:” thus confirming my
identification with the system: and a line or two beneath this
he again says, “ If the views of Messrs. Swainson and Shuckard
** display the slightest approach to nature, then are those of
* Mr. Macleay the most distorted, wild and unnatural: there
“is no point of similarity between the systems, except the
“ frequent recurrence of the number Five. The bold altera-
“tion made by the authors in separating the Diptera from
** winged insects, is the most striking feature in the new ar-
“rangement; it proves them to be profound and original
* thinkers, and not only this, it displays an inditference to the
* The Entomologist, No. III. p.38.
42 Mr. Shuckard on the Views of Arrangement
“ opinions of others, which must be the result of the mens
“ conscia recta.”
Would you think it possible, gentlemen, that this repetition
of my assumed identity with the system of Mr. Swainson
could be made in the face of this Latin phrase, and of the
prefixed advertisement? and you will scarcely believe me
when I tell you that their writer, at the end of the article,
says, very coolly, at the bottom of this same page*, “I have
“been led from its title to assign the merits of this volume
“ conjointly to Messrs. Swainson and Shuckard, and have
“been treating them like the Siamese twins, as inseparable
“in fame; but fairness compels me to add that the system
“ of classification is entirely Mr. Swainson’s. Mr. Shuckard
“has most ingenuously disavowed any share in this, the great
“feature of the work, and I am compelled to place the
“ chaplet of laurel on the brows of Mr. Swainson alone,—
“ nalmam qui meruit ferat !”
One would have supposed, if “ fairness” was to have any
influence in the matter, that the writer being fully aware, as
he here shows himself to have been, that I had no participation
whatever in Mr. Swainson’s system of classification, it would
have “ compelled” him to abstain froin carrying on through
the whole of his article these imputations, which he with such
amusing naiveté confesses he all the while knew to be un-
founded: and is it not rather surprising that, having been
driven thus to strangle these his unfortunate offspring from
despair of being able to maintain them, he should not at once
have quietly buried them out of the way, rather than leave
their remains exposed to testify against their parent and their
executioner ? It would be superfluous for me to make any re-
mark ; his own statement is sufficient to give your readers an
idea of the fairness to be expected in such ‘analytical notices.’
No man has a right to complain of his own scientific views
being fairly discussed, but every man has a right to repulse
the attribution of views which he does not hold. My own
ideas of ‘system’ must be known to many entomologists ;
for what I formerly said in my ‘ Essay on the Fossorial Hy-
menopterat,’ and subsequently repeated in this journal as
* The Entomologist, p. 40.
+ Page 1l. I conceive that when all the created species are fully ascer-
tained, the true system will be found to be neither circular, square, nor
oval, neither dichotomous, quinary, nor septenary, but a uniform meshwork
of organization, spread like anet over the universe. But what gaps remain
to be filled! We are truly as yet scarcely upon the threshold of the great
temple, and consequently still remote from the adytum where the veiled
statue reposes. We have not yet learnt our alphabet, for species are the
letters whereby the book of Nature must be read. London, 1835.
of Mr. Swainson and Mr. Newman. 43
lately as July last *, ought to secure me from the suspicion
of being wedded to any of these dictatorial systems, which
conveniently contrive that where gaps occur in their hypo-
theses the creatures are yet to be found that must fill them,
and where inconvenient redundancies exist in Nature, these
are made to merge in groups to which they have no osten-
sible affinity. To such systems may be applied the judicious
observations of the reviewer of Gcethe’s ‘ Theory of Colours + :’
they ‘intentionally obscure what they cannot illustrate, and
*“ affect to be profound when they are only disguising their ig-
* norance.” I have not even faith in the Septenary system f,
although that is illuminated by the seven golden candlesticks §
of Solomon’s temple||, and has found in the sabbath an hebdo-
madal repose from the labours of such crude concoctions,
but of which Burmeister said, “ what is good in it is not new,
and what is new is not good,” and this has since been re-
peated here by a very courteous friend** of the author of
the system. ‘Trusting that this appeal to your candour and
sense of justice will not be in vain, I subscribe myself, gen-
tlemen,
Your very obedient servant,
W. E. SHUCKARD.
31 Robert Street, Chelsea, Feb. 4, 1841.
* At the conclusion of the ‘ Monograph of the Dorylidz,’ where I said,
“The object I have pursued in studying Natural History has been to ascer-
tain facts, or in their absence the closest possible approximation to them ; for
I am sure, to use the words of our great bard,
‘ Nature is made better by no mean,
But Nature makes that mean.’
And she is too protean in her disguises to be fitted by any boddice we may
choose to invest her with.”
+ Edin. Review, Oct. 1840, p. 141.
t Sphinzx vespiformis, by Edward Newman. London. 8vo. 1832.
§ Were I disposed to cavil at such a display as the adduction of these
numbers, made evidently in good earnest, and not sportively, for really it
would have been too profane to have cited Scripture in jest, I might ob-
ject to the incorrectness of the Septenary’s attribution of seven candlesticks
to Solomon's temple ; for they consisted of ten, five being placed on the right
side and five on the left of the oracle (an argument in favour of the quina-
rians!), and Moses’s single candlestick had but six branches, although, it is
true, seven lamps were suspended from it; but seven candlesticks occur only
in the vision of St. John at Patmos, which shows what a fantastical affair
a system founded upon these seven candlesticks must be. I trust that when
the ‘ Septenary’ dveams again, his revelation will be more pertinent than it
is in the present instance.
\| Sphinx vespiformis, by Edward Newman. London. 8vo. 1832. Page 15.
§| Wiegmann’s Archiv. vol. i. No. 4.
** Westwood’s Introduction to the Classification of Insects, vol. i. p. 20.
44 Excerpta Botanica.
VII.—Excerpta Botanica, or abridged Extracts translated
Strom the Foreign Journals, illustrative of, or connected with,
the Botany of Great Britain. By W. A. Le1auron, Esq.,
BEA, EB 39. E., ec.
No. 5. On the Anther of Chara vulgaris and Chara hispida,
and the Animalcules contained in it. By M. Gustavus
Tuurer. (Ann. des Sc. Nat. vol. xiv. p. 65.)
In the axillz of the branches of Chara, immediately below
the carpels, are globular sessile bodies, of a vivid red colour,
which, entirely disappearing on the approaching maturity of
the carpels, are conjectured to perform the functions of sta-
mens, although in other respects they possess no analogy of
organization with the male organs of Phanerogame. The
outer covering of these consists of a membrane formed of
transparent cellules, which produce the appearance of a white
ring encircling the anther. Under this membrane are irregu-
lar oval cellules arranged into triangular valves, each valve
being composed of from twelve to twenty cellules radiating
from a common centre, and enclosing the red granules which
produce the brilliant colour of the anther. On the full deve-
lopment of the anther these valves disunite, and permit the bo-
dies enclosed in their interiors to expand in the water. Those
anthers most remote from the central axis always open first,
and those on the lower whorls before those on the upper ones.
The interior of the anther is filled with flexuose, transparent,
chambered (cloisonnées) filaments, of unequal length, ema-
nating chiefly from a central cellular base, from which also
radiate a few ovoid utricules, containing orange-coloured gra-
nules. Each of these utricules adheres to the cellular base
by its narrowest extremity, and is fixed perpendicularly by
its largest extremity to the centre of one of the triangular
valves. The contained granules are oval, orange-coloured,
and arranged in a linear series ; whilst, on the contrary, in the
cellules of the valves the granules are round, red, scattered
without order, and distant from the walls of the cellules.
In these chambered filaments the animalcules are produced.
These filaments, when examined in a very young state, appear
only as oval utricules enclosing a granular matter, some of them
being detached, but the greater number adherent to the cel-
lular base before mentioned. A little later these utricules be-
come chambered, a nucleus appearing in each chamber or di-
vision. The introduction of the water through the walls of
the filaments seems to conduce towards the formation of the
nucleus, at least such is my conjecture, from having frequently
Excerpta Botanica. 45
observed the rapid formation of the nucleus in filaments which
previously possessed no traces of it. These nuclei have a slight
green tinge, probably owing to an optical illusion, and become
brown by iodine. They are always affixed (adossés) to the
partitions (cloisons). Gradually they become effaced, and the
animalcules begin to be distinguished ; indeed, they are fre-
quently observable at one extremity, whilst the nuclei remain
at the other, even in the same anther and filament. On the
complete formation of the animalcules, the partitions of the
chambers are indistinguishable, from the confusion arising
from the great number of the curves. At each curvature of
the animalcule a swelling (black or brilliant, according to the
increase or diminution of focal distance) is perceived, doubt-
less owing to the optical illusion produced by the greater
thickness of the body at these points of flexion.
The animalcules are at first motionless, and remain for a
greater or lesser time in the water before they begin to move
and struggle to release themselves from their prison. In this
they do not always succeed, although their twisted position
attests the efforts made for disengagement. Those which do
succeed escape laterally by a sudden motion, similar to the
elasticity of a slackened spring. After this great effort they
remain for some time motionless, or if the temperature and
season be unfavourable, their motions are slow and soon
cease. On the contrary, the animalcules observed at the end
of June and beginning of July agitated themselves with ex-
treme vivacity, and in such a manner as to leave no doubt of
their animality. They rapidly traversed the field of the mi-
croscope in different directions, crossing and meeting each
other, and deviating from their route, and after employing the
greater portion of the day in observation, they were left in si-
milar and unrelaxed motions.
The portion of their body most apparent appeared like a
spirally-rolled thread of three to five curves (un fil roulé en
tirebouchon, formant de 3a5 tours de spire.) They were
slightly tinged with green similar to the nuclei, and like them
turned brown with iodine; their two extremities becoming
more or less coloured (according to the quantity of iodine
employed) than the rest of the body, thus indicating a differ-
ence of nature in these portions. At a little distance behind
one extremity proceed two bristles or tentacula of excessive
tenuity, which the animalcule incessantly agitates with great
rapidity. These are probably organs of locomotion similar
to the filiform prolongation found in the Infusoria without
ciliz. Indeed, the part thus furnished with tentacula moves
46 Excerpta Botanica.
foremost, drawing after it the rest of the body, which turns
about in the water, but always preserves its twrriculate form.
The incessant agitation of these tentacula and their extreme
tenuity rendered it impossible to observe them in the living
animal; recourse was therefore had to the evaporation of the
water or to the application of a slight tincture of iodine, when
the animalcules ceased their motions, became contracted, and
their spiral unrolled, when the tentacula were rendered very
distinct, from their brown colour. These tentacula were fre-
quently observed to be soldered together from one-half to one-
third of their length upwards, but others were also noticed to
be entirely separated down to their bases. A swelling similar
to that in the flexure of the body was perceived in their
curves.
Ammonia arrested their motions and contracted the body
gradually into a small oval mass, but did not produce the
phenomenon of decomposition by solution (difluence) so re-
markable in the Infusoria. A very weak solution of chlor-
hydric acid in water violently contracted them into a shape-
less mass.
In escaping from the filaments a portion only of the body
of the animalcule was sometimes disengaged, and fruitless ef-
forts were made by it to extricate the rest. In such cases it
was noticed that the portion bearing the tentacula invariably
remained within the tube of the filament. On the filaments
becoming empty, their divisions reappeared very distinctly.
No traces of the passage of the animalcule were observed, un-
less the brilliant points sometimes seen on each division of
the filament be regarded as such.
The ovoid utricules accompanying the filaments are sphe-
roidal in the young anthers, but subsequently take the form of
an egg truncated at both ends, or nearly that of a parallelo-
gram, having one of its ends narrower than the other. Their
wall or paries is transparent, the orange granules contained
in them being of an elongated form, and lying in longitudinal
lines in the direction of the currents of circulation, their upper
extremity alone being destitute of them.
In the interior of the utricules is frequently an oval globule,
generally motionless, but sometimes circulating with greater
or less rapidity along the walls. Besides this globule, which
is apparently formed of a granular fluid, are seen the rapid
currents ascending and descending longitudinally. These two
circulations, which are doubtless different appearances of the
same phenomenon, occur either together or separately in the
same utricule. In some utricules the globule was motionless,
Mr. Babington on Saxifraga umbrosa. 47
whilst three round and thick orange-coloured granules ascend-
ed and descended together rapidly along the same line of cir-
culation, and continued visible from one extremity to the
other.
After long immersion of the utricules in water, the arrange-
ment of the orange-coloured granules apparently proved the
existence of a double sac in which the granules were contained.
The circulation in this case was similar to that described by
Mr. Slack im hairs of Tradescantia (Trans. Soc. Arts, vol.
xlix. p.41). ‘Each articulation appeared to consist of an
exterior glassy tube. Between this and the colouring matter
was the circulating fluid with its molecules. The coloured
fluid of the hair appeared to be enclosed in a membranous
sac, which formed an axis around which the fluid circulated.”
On crushing the anther there were observed some purple
hairs formed of an immense quantity of granules of extreme
minuteness, endowed with a very quick molecular motion.
Iodine rendered the orange granules green. Alcohol did
not dissolve them. ‘The latter did not arrest the circulation
of the nucleus in the ovoid utricules, although it instantane-
ously killed the animalcules.
VIII.—Notes on Saxifraga umbrosa: By Cuaruess C, Ba-
BINGTON, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S., &c.; and by the Reviewer
of Baines’s ‘ Yorkshire Flora.’
In the 39th Number of these Annals (vol. vi. p. 401), the Rev.
W. T. Bree expresses his doubt if the Sazxifraga umbrosa is
“in fact a genuine native of Britain ;” and if he had said Great
Britain, I should have been inclined to say that it has all the
appearance of having been introduced, and that much more
evidence is requisite before we ought to admit it to have been
a genuine native. Concerning Ireland, however, I must ex-
press quite the contrary opinion, being convinced that there
is no plant that has a more decided claim to be considered as
certainly indigenous. I have myself seen it in the greatest
plenty upon the wild mountains of Connamara and Joice’s
county, but certainly did not notice it in the neighbourhood
of Killarney, where S. Gewm is peculiarly abundant.
It is worthy of notice, that the plant found in Connamara
differs as a variety from the Pyrenean plant, by having its
leaves dentate, crenate, and not simply and bluntly crenate,
as in the plant from the Pyrenees. The figure given in Eng.
Bot. (t. 663), which was taken from a specimen gathered at
Throp Arch woods, in Yorkshire, approaches much more
48 Mr. T. C. Eyton’s Notes on Birds.
nearly to the foreign than to the Irish plant ; and I have reason
to believe that all the ‘ London Pride’ found “ wild” in Great
Britain will prove to be the blunt crenate-leaved plant, and to
have escaped from cultivation, or been intentionally planted.
St. John’s Coll., Cambridge, Feb. 8, 1841.
On Saxifraga umbrosa.
Tne writer of the notice of Baines’s ‘ Yorkshire Flora’ begs to
state, in reference to Mr. Bree’s paper, that he mentioned Sax-
ifraga umbrosa as abundant in the west and south of Ireland,
in consequence of having seen it himself in great quantity in
the west of the county of Cork during a botanical tour made
in the year 1811, and having heard from friends whom he
considered as good judges, that it is equally common in Con-
naught. He considered himself as knowing S. hirsuta and
S. Geum at the time he made the tour referred to; and he is
confirmed in the belief that he did not commit an error, by
having now before him a MS. journal of a rather more ex-
tended tour through the same district in 1809 by Mr. James
Drummond, then curator of the Cork Botanic Garden, from
which it appears that Mr. Drummond found S. umbrosa
abundantly in the county of Cork, and also met with both
Geum and hirsuta in the mountains between Cork and Kerry.
The station of S. wmbrosa at Thorpe Arch would be very
suspicious, had it not been noticed before the grounds were
ornamented as they are at present, and by such an accurate
botanist as, for example, the late Rev. W. Wood of Leeds.
Respecting the other Yorkshire stations the writer can give
no opinion.
1X.—WNotes on Birds. By T. C. Eyron, Esq., F.L.S.
Now:
I propose in the following series of papers to give from time
to time such extracts from my note-book relating to Birds as I
think likely to prove interesting to my readers ; the first por-
tions will be principally occupied with anatomical notes on
some Australian Birds received from Mr. Gould, and on some
received from Malacca. With regard to the former birds, it
is not my intention to go minutely into detail, or further than
what I believe to be necessary to show the position of each
in a natural arrangement. I take this course, as I understand
that eminent anatomist, Mr. Owen, has undertaken to fur-
nish Mr. Gould, for his work on the ‘ Birds of Australia,’ with
a more detailed account.
Mr. T. C. Kyton’s Notes on Birds. 49
Menura Lyra, Shaw. Male.
Tongue tapering towards the tip, which is slightly bifid, blunt,
and furnished with a fringe of bristles; the centre concave, and fur-
nished posteriorly with two strong spines on each side at the base,
between which is a row of smaller ones.
Trachea of nearly uniform diameter throughout the rings, broad
as far as its entrance into the thorax, afterwards rounded and nar-
row, with a large membranous space between them; they are ar-
ranged somewhat obliquely, as in the bulb found on the trachea of
Clangula vulgaris. Bone of divarication Y-shaped. Upper bones of
the bronchiz are semicircular, the uppermost largest, the next being _
inclosed in its arc; the fourth is much flattened, thickest and broad-
est anteriorly, and with a prominent knob on its anterior extremity,
from which it gradually tapers towards the posterior end, where it
is somewhat falciform and suddenly narrowed to a point. The next,
or fifth bone, is also much flattened, and straight for two-thirds of its
length, when it also becomes suddenly falciform, with the point of the
hook turned downwards.
In addition to the usual sterno-tracheal muscles, this curious bird
has two other pair, both of which have their origin on the rings of
the trachea on each side, at the point where it enters the cavity of
the thorax. The anterior pair is inserted on the knobs at the extre-
mities of the fourth bones of the bronchi; the posterior pair are
also inserted on the bronchiz, but on the three uppermost rings, and
on the posterior extremity of the fifth. Besides these muscles, which
are very strong, additional support is given to the portion of the
trachea over which they extend, by a tendon arising at the same
point with the last-mentioned pair of muscles, but between them,
and extending to the eleventh, twelfth and thirteenth rings of the
bronchiz, on each of which it is partially inserted: this arrangement
gives the bird a great power of shortening or lengthening that por-
tion of the trachea over which the muscles extend.
The cesophagus is small at the upper extremity, slightly enlarged
in the middle and towards the proventriculus, the coats of which are
not much thicker than the cesophagus itself ; nor is it contracted at its
entrance into the stomach. The stomach is of moderate size, mus-
cular, and has a large internal cavity, which was filled with seeds,
the remains of insects and small pebbles. The epithelium, or mem-
brane lining the stomach, hardened and rugose, particularly on the
grinding surfaces ; it measures 13 inch in length, and 1 inch in
breadth.
The total length of the intestinal canal, measuring from the py-
lorus to the cloaca, is about 3 feet 10 inches, that of the rectum 3?
inches; the diameter of the duodenum is equal to that of the rec-
tum, that of both being 3 of an inch; the ceca are scarcely more than
rudimentary, measuring only 4 an inch in length; the cloaca is of
moderate size, and situated about 1 foot 7 inches above it, and at-
tached to the small intestine is found the remains of the vitelline
duct (ductus vitello-intestinalis).
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. i
50 Mr. T. C. Eyton’s Notes on Birds.
The skeleton at first sight is chiefly remarkable for the large size
and length of the bones of the legs and feet. ‘The sternum is long
and narrow, measuring from the anterior extremity of the manubrial
process 3 inches, and transversely, just behind the junction of the co-
racoids, where it is narrowest, ;8,ths of an inch ; its posterior margin
is indented by two slight lateral fissures, between which it is much
rounded and projects posteriorly ; the lateral margins are slightly
curved inwards ; the broadest part of the sternum is near its poste-
rior extremity, where it measures 1 inch and 4 tenths. ‘The inden-
tation in which the lesser pectoral muscle lies is very deep, rises
into a ridge on the lateral margin, and is continued from the junc-
tion of the coracoids about half-way along the sternum ; the ante-
rior edge of the keel is slightly curved backwards, the inferior edge
is a little rounded and continued to the posterior margin of the ster-
num; the manubrial process is very long and bifurcate at its extre-
mity ; the coracoids are of moderate length and strength. ‘The os
furcatum is light, slightly flattened, arched, and with only a very
small process at its sternal extremity. ‘The scapula is slightly falci-
form, of moderate length and size, reaching backwards to the third
true rib. ‘The wing-bones are short, but strong.
The bones composing the pelvis are precisely what might be ex-
pected to be found in a bird possessing sucha large tail; it measures
2 inches and ;%ths in length, and 1,%ths in breadth ; the iliac bones
are broad, but form a lengthened process on each side of the caudal
vertebre for the attachment of the levator muscles of the tail. The
ischium is also broad, and placed nearly perpendicularly to the plane
of the ilium. ‘The ischiadic foramina are large and rounded; the
sides of the pelvis are much compressed from the point at which
they penetrate to the posterior margin, the bones of the ilium being
expanded beyond, and overshadowing, as it were, those of the
ischium ; the os pubis is narrow and curved upwards beyond its se-
cond junction with the ischium. The obturator foramen is of mo-
derate size and oval; the cotyloid cavity for the reception of the
head of the femur is deep, and has the hinder portion of its upper
edge very protuberant. ‘The ribs are eight in number, five true and
three false : two of the false ones are placed anteriorly and one pos-
teriorly; the latter has a sternal rib attached, but it does not arti-
culate with the sternum ; the upper portions of the ribs next the ver-
tebrae are much flattened, but they become thicker and narrower
as they approach the appendage on their posterior margin, which is
slightly turned upwards, and of moderate strength. :
The numbering of the vertebr, as near as could be ascertained
from a natural skeleton, is*, Cer. 12; Dor. 6; Sac. 12? Caud. 9, The
* T have followed the same plan in the enumeration of the vertebrz here
as I did in the ‘ Monograph on the Anatide,’ viz. by considering all those
which are anterior to the ribs and have no attachment to them, cervical ;
those anterior to the pelvinal bones and having ribs attached to them, dor-
sal ; those which are anchylosed together immediately succeeding the dorsal,
sacral; to some these ribs are sometimes attached : and those immediately
succeeding these, and not anchylosed to them, caudal.
Mr. T. C. Eyton’s Notes on Birds. 51
lateral processes of the caudal vertebre are much prolonged, parti-
cularly those of the last four but one; the terminal one is without
any lateral process, and nearly triangular.
Remarxks.—The extraordinary and doubtful structure of
this bird is at once shown by the different places in which it
has been arranged by authors; by Cuvier it is placed among
the Passeres, by Lesson and Swainson among the Gallina-
ceous birds, and by Gray among the Grallatores. The large
and powerful legs which Menura possesses in such an eminent
degree, has been doubtless the principal reason why it has
been classed by the authors above-mentioned among Rasores
and Grallatores ; but on minute examination the scutellations
of the tarsi will be found to differ from any of the typical
birds in either of these orders, and to agree with that of the
true Insessores. Another very striking point in the external
structure consists in the great length of the claws, their great
strength, and in their being rounded and blunt at the points,
and attached to toes of moderate size*. Some of the Ral-
lide possess lengthened claws, but they are sharp, in general
weak and attached to long thin toes, therefore differing from
Menura. The Alaudide have the hind toe lengthened, but
it is also weak and sharp; some of the Cuculide also have this
structure, as the genus Pelophilus, in which the claws are not
so much sharpened as in any of the preceding instances. The
genus Pteroptochost has precisely the same form of claw as
in Menura, and agrees with that genus in many anatomical
peculiarities, nearly the only difference being that it has four
fissures on the posterior margin of the sternum instead of
two. Menura appears to be nearly connected with Megapo-
dius, and perhaps with Alecthelia, judging merely from exter-
nal characters; but differs from Talegalla, Chauna, Palamedea,
Dicholophus, Psophia, Crax, Ourax, Ortalida, Penelope and
Lophocerus, with all of which it has been associated in the
same family, in presenting an almost total difference in the
structure of the tarsi and feet as well as in the form of the
bill, which any one who has an opportunity of examining
them, or even some of the best plates, will at once perceive.
In the structure of the soft parts and digestive organs, Me-
nura agrees with that of Insessores ; and with many of them,
* On comparing the feet of Menura with those of Insessorial birds, they
will not be found, exclusive of the claw, to be of a larger proportion to the
size of the bird than many birds among Insessores.
+ For some account of the anatomy of this genus, see ‘ The Zoology of the
Voyage of the Beagle,—Birds.’— Appendix.
t This family appears to be a sort of refuge for the destitute.
K2
52 Mr. T. C. Eyton’s Notes on Birds.
especially with the genus Gallina of Vieillot, in the compli-
cated muscular structure of the inferior larynx.
The pelvis, as before remarked, is precisely of that form
which might be expected to be found in a bird having power-
ful legs and a large tail, and therefore presents some similar-
ity to the Rasores in this respect, but differs from that order
in those portions of it not immediately connected with those
parts; thus the obturator foramen in Menura is large, while
in Rasores it is small or altogether obliterated ; the extremity
of the os pubis is turned upward, while in Rasores it is turned
downward; in the former of these particulars it agrees with
Insessores and Scansores, but in the latter with most of the
Insessores.
The structure of the sternum agrees with Insessores in
having only two fissures on its posterior margin, but differs
essentially from any birds I am acquainted with in that order
in being much prolonged backwards and rounded between
them. The only approach to this structure that I am aware
of is among the Psittacide, some of the Australian Ground-
Parrots having nearly the same structure as Pezoporus for-
mosus on the posterior margin, with this exception, that fora-
mina take the place of fissures *.
The os furcatum is slight, and destitute of any terminal pro-
cess at its sternal extremity, in which respects it agrees with
Scansores.
The structure of the ribs, in being much broader above the
posterior process, coincides both with many Insessores and
Scansores ; but this character is most marked in the latter
order.
Such is the mixed and doubtful character which Menura
shows, but by far the strongest affinity is shown to Insessores ;
in which order this genus may form a family with Pteropto-
chos, and perhaps with Alecthelia and Megapodiust+, bearing
an affinity to Scansores. Although a full account of the
habits of this bird may be shortly expected from the pen of
Mr. Gould, I shall here remark, that what has hitherto been
considered fabulous, namely, that this bird has the power of
song, is far from improbable, considering the structure of its
* These birds have also the claws and tarsi considerably Jengthened. Some
resemblance to the posterior margin of the sternum of Menura is also found
among the Scolopacide, in the Common Woodcock for instance; but the
remainder of the skeleton is so totally unlike, that I cannot for a moment
suppose that any degree of affinity exists.
+ I venture this opinion with very great doubt; nothing but an anato-
mical examination can decide the point; the habit appears to be different.
See Freycinet’s Voyage, Zoologie, p. 124.
Bibliographical Notices. 53
trachea and muscles. Its affinity to Scansores is also, I think,
explained by the great facility with which it scrambles or
climbs over rocks and stumps*.
I have considered Scansores as distinct from Insessores
throughout this paper; and think that ornithologists will,
until more is known of the anatomy of birds than at pre-
sent, find it convenient to class Birds in the following Orders,
which may be distinguished in general by their skeletons :—
Raprores, VOLITORES (containing the Fissirostral groups),
Scansorgs, Insessores, RAsores, Cursores, GRALLA-
ToRES and Nararores. Perhaps the Pigeons also with ad-
vantage may be divided from the other Rasorss.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
An Introduction to the modern Classification of Insects, founded on the
Natural Habits and Corresponding Organization of the different
Families. By J. O. Westwood, F.L.S., &c. 2 vols. 8vo, with
Figures. London: Longman and Co.
No branch of natural science has made such extraordinary and
rapid strides within the last few years in this country as the study
of insects. The contrast which it exhibits at the present day, com-
pared with its state thirty years ago, is most striking. Then, at the
period when we commenced our entomological career, the literature
of the science was most meagre and marrowless ; we had, it is true,
for our guides Stewart’s ‘ Elements,’ Marsham’s ‘ Coleoptera,’ Ha-
worth’s ‘ Lepidoptera,’ and the picture-books of Doudran, estimable
works enough in their way, but from which the inquirer who wished
to obtain more than aknowledge of the mere name of his species would
not derive a particle of philosophy. The minute investigations of
the anatomist, the principles of natural classification founded upon
the various relations of the different tribes and the variations in the
metamorphoses of all insects, save the Lepidoptera, were subjects
scarcely dreamt of ; and, in truth, the entomologist merited no other
name than that of a collector, his only aim being the getting toge-
ther of as great a number of species as possible, and storing them up
in his cabinets.
The appearance of the first two volumes of the ‘ Introduction’ of
Messrs. Kirby and Spence placed the science on a far different foot-
ing, showing the inquirer, in a most engaging manner, that it pos-
sessed far higher claims to his attention. In these delightful vo-
lumes the natural history and ceconomy of the insect tribes were
proved to be as interesting and worthy of observation as those of the
highest animals. The subsequent appearance of the third and fourth
volumes of the same work opened the wide field of insect anatomy
and the principles of entomological classification ; thus forming,
* See Collins’s Account of New South Wales.
54 Bibliographical Notices.
with the preceding volumes, the most complete general ‘ Introduc-
tion’ to the study hitherto published. ‘These were shortly followed
by the appearance of Mr. Curtis’s beautiful work on the ‘ Genera of
British Insects,’ recently noticed in our pages, and by the ‘ Systematic
Catalogue and Illustrations’ of Mr. Stephens, the latter consisting of
detailed descriptions of all the British species.
Besides these, a very considerable number of minor treatises
have been produced by authors who have in a great measure been
instigated to the pursuit by the establishment of the various ento-
mological societies, and whose works are scattered through the pages
of numberless English and Foreign Transactions and other similar
works. During this period also the principles of natural classifica-
tion have been greatly investigated both at home and abroad, but in
no work have these principles being applied throughout to the nu-
merous families of insects.
The object of the present work may be best shown by the follow-
ing passages from the preface to the first volume. After noticing
the distinction between the general nature of Introductions to Ento-
mology and the generic and specific nature of the works of Curtis,
Stephens, etc., the author observes that the student has hitherto
been ‘‘led at once from the general views he had gained on the sub-
ject to the minute technical details of genera and species, there being
no work which he could take up to serve as a guide to the develop-
ment of the principles of modern classification in the distribution of
the orders and families. For years this deficiency has strikingly
manifested itself to me, and it is long since I announced my present
undertaking, in which I had proposed to myself to show the appli-
cation of the modern views which have been entertained relative to
the natural relations of animals in the arrangement of the entire
groups of winged insects ; illustrating the subject by details of the
natural habits, transformations, and structure of the different fami-
lies?
The work opens with a series of general observations upon the
class of Insects, their general structure and transformations, and the
various systems of Swammerdam, Linneus, Fabricius, Latreille and
MacLeay, the respective authors of the metamorphotic, alary, ciba-
rian, eclectic, and representative systems. The arrangement adopted
by the author nearly corresponds with that of MacLeay, the orders
of Hexapod, Metamorphotic Insects (which are alone treated upon
in this work), being divided into two parallel sub-classes. Each order
with its sections is then passed in review, ample details being given
of the characters, structures, habits, transformations, and general dis-
tribution and relation of the different families, with an illustration
of their characteristic anatomical details and preparatory states. It
is thus that the author has endeavoured to make his work a fitting
c Sequel’ to the ‘Introduction’ of Kirby and Spence, whilst at the
same time it will be found equally, if not still more, useful to the
student who would extend his inquiries beyond the details of genera
and species : in this respect it forms an equally fitting precursor to
the works of Curtis, Stephens, etc. A few extracts, however, will
Bibliographical Notices. 5a
more satisfactorily show the manner in which the author has treated
the subject in its various bearings; we will therefore take the distri-
bution of the Coleoptera, which has lately been the subject of much
discussion, as an example of the manner in which the natural classi-
fication of insects is treated. After reviewing the arrangements of
Linneus, Latreille, MacLeay, etc. (that of the last-named author
being founded upon the analogical relations of the preparatory
states and the asserted inaccuracy of the tarsal system), the author
observes, in addition to our ignorance of the larvae of many import-
ant groups, ‘‘ that Mr. MacLeay himself admits the existence of a
variation in the tarsal structure concurrent with the variation in the
form of the larve, a circumstance dependent, as it seems to me,
upon the principle that modifications of the preparatory states of an
insect ought merely to be regarded as indications of corresponding
peculiarities in the final state, the former modifications being subor-
dinate to those observed in the imago, and having, in fact, been un-
dergone with a direct view to the perfection of the insect. We might
indeed carry the subject still further. ‘Thus, whilst the intimate
connexion existing throughout the whole of the Tetramerous Beetles
cannot be denied, yet Cerambyx has a subvermiform and Chryso-
mela an anopluriform larva; whilst the latter and Coccinella (Mr.
MacLeay’s two examples of the Anopluriform Stirps), although
agreeing in the larve, are totally different in the habits and in the
structure of the tarsi of the imago.”’ After some further observa-
tions, he adds, that “ The Coleoptera are therefore divisible into the
four following sections: 1. Pentamera, in which all the tarsi are 5-
jointed, the fourth being of ordinary size; 2. Heteromera, in which
the four anterior tarsi are 5-jointed, and the two posterior 4-jointed ;
3. Pseudotetramera (or Subpentamera, Tetramera, Latreille, Crypto-
pentamera, Burm.), in which the tarsi are 5-jointed, but the fourth
joint is exceedingly diminutive, and concealed between the lobes
of the preceding; 4. Pseudotrimera (or Subtetramera, Tetramera,
Latr., Cryptotetramera, Burm.),in which the tarsi are 4-jointed, the
third joint being very diminutive, and concealed between the lobes
of the preceding.”
As a specimen of the structural details, the following account of
the structure of the mouth of the preparatory states of the May-fly
(Ephemera vulgata) may be quoted :—‘‘ Considering the rudimental
nature of the mouth of the imago, it is surprising that no one has
hitherto described the real structure of the mouth in the preparatory
states. Reaumur has attempted it, but his figures are so rude and in-
sufficient, that no idea can be gleaned as to their true structure ;
Swammerdam also passes them over undescribed. In the pupa
of E. vulgata the upper lip is of moderate size, with the anterior
angles rounded off and ciliated ; it is flat and quite membranous : the
mandibles are horny, armed with several teeth within, near the base,
which is dilated into a flattened molary plate, whilst the upper angle
of the mandible is produced into a long curved horn, The maxille
are small, membranous, curved, pointed at the tip and internally se-
tose : the maxillary palpi do not extend beyond the front of the head ;
56 Bibliographical Notices.
they are 4-jointed, the basal joint being very short: the lower lip is
very large and membranous, covering the under side of the mouth;
it is quadrilobed and furnished within with a broad tongue, of which
the anterior angles are produced and pilose; the labial palpi are
broad and 3-jointed.”
The account of the proceedings of the Ant-lion may be taken as
an example of the manner in which the natural history of the various
families is treated :—
“Tt is in very fine sand that the larva makes its pitfall. When
placed upon the surface, it bends down the extremity of the body,
and then pushing, or rather dragging, itself backwards by the assist-
ance of its hind legs, but more particularly of the deflexed extremity
of its body, it gradually insinuates itself into and beneath the sand,
constantly throwing off the particles which fall upon, or which it
shovels, with its jaws or legs upon its head, by suddenly jerking
them backwards,
‘Ossaque post tergum magne jactata parentis.’
‘“« Proceeding in this manner, in a spiral direction, it gradually di-
minishes the diameter of its path, and by degrees throws so much of
the sand away, as to form a conical pit, at the bottom of which it
then conceals itself, its mandibles, widely extended, being the only
parts that appear above the surface ; with these, any luckless insect
that may happen to fall down the hole is immediately seized and
killed. When the fluids of the victim are exhausted, the Ant-lion,
by a sudden jerk, throws the dry carcass out of the hole; should,
‘however, the insect by chance escape the murderous jaws of its
enemy, the latter immediately commences throwing up the sand,
whereby not only is the hole made deeper and its sides steeper, but
the escaping insect is probably hit, and again brought down to the
bottom of the pit. It is chiefly upon ants and other soft-bodied in-
sects that these larve feed. ‘Chey are, however, capable of under-
going long fasts, for one of my larve remained from October till
March without food. It has been supposed that, as the food of these
larvee consists entirely of juices, and as they appear to be destitute
of anal aperture, the whole of their food is assimilated. M. L. Du-
four has, however, traced the intestinal canal terminating in an anus,
which is, indeed, very difficult to discover. (Ann. Soc. Ent. de
France, tom. il. p.67. App.) Latreille states that these larve are
produced in the summer or autumn, and become pupz in the follow-
ing spring. I found the larve of all sizes in July, one of which
became a pupa, and assumed the perfect state; whilst another, of
equal size, remained through the winter in the larva state. Previous
to assuming the pupa state, the larva forms a globular cocoon of less
than half an inch in diameter of fine sand, glued with silken threads
spun from a slender telescopic-like spinneret placed at the extremity
of its body, and lined with fine silk. The pupa is small, not being
half an inch long, inactive, and with all its limbs laid at rest upon
the breast. When ready to assume the perfect state it uses its man-
dibles, which are quite unlike those of the larva and imago, and
Bibliographical Notices. is |
which have not been before described, to gnaw a hole through the
cocoon, and pushes itself partly through the aperture, in which it
leaves the pupa skin.”
The work is illustrated with a coloured plate, containing examples
of most of the orders, and by nearly 2500 figures representing the
types of the different families, with their preparatory states and struc-
tural peculiarities, there being not fewer than 340 figures of perfect
insects, and more than 420 of larvee and pup. Another important
feature in the work, and one which we can well believe must have
cost the author very great labour, is the bibliographical references
to each of the families. These cannot fail to be of infinite service to,
the student, as they contain notices of every paper or detached me-
moir of the least value published on the subject up to the date of the
work. At the same time, in order to render it still more useful, a com-
plete synopsis of the British genera, brought down to the present
time, is added, and in which are included the characters, synonyms, and
authorities of the genera, the number of British species, and name of
the type, with a reference to a figure of the genus. Having thus
given our readers an insight into the comprehensive nature of the
work before us, we must observe, that the discussion of the relations
of the different families, and of the views entertained thereof by pre-
ceding writers, appears too much detailed. ‘The great extent of the
subject, however, and the comparatively slight grounds existing to-
wards a perfect classification of the very numerous tribes of insects,
have necessarily involved many of their relations in doubt, and of
which the discussion cannot fail to be productive of advantage. We
also notice a few typographical errors, some of which, however, are
corrected in the Appendix. In conclusion, as this work has the rare
merit of interfering with no other hitherto published, we cordially
recommend it as one rendered necessary by the progress of the
science, and as the result of the most laborious research, and conse-
quently as deserving, both from its nature and execution, of be-
coming a standard work of reference in every zoological library.
Otia Hispanica. Auctore P. B. Webb. Pentas 2, 1839.
The present number of this valuable work, which has only recently
reached us, is occupied by figures and descriptions of five species of
Alge, by C. Montague, M.D., and as they are all either new or but
little known, we cannot do better than transcribe their specific cha-
racters ; we must, however, previously state that each of the species
is fully illustrated by magnified dissections, and by a detailed de-
scription and copious observations.
l. Griffithsia flabellata (Montag.), filis setaceis virgatis, ramis al-
ternis pinnatis, pinnis tandem divaricato-recurvis, pimnulis sub-
secundis erectis, articulis diametro quintuplo-duplo longioribus,
capsulis maximis involucratis—Ceramium et Callithamnion
flexuosum, Agardh.
Agardh appears never to have seen the fruit of this plant, and
58 Zoological Society.
therefore referred it to Callithamnion, to which genus it is closely al-
lied in general appearance. Its fruit is that of a Griffithsia.
2. Griffithsia Schousboei (Montag. ), repens, intricata, filis dichotomis
articulato-constrictis, articulis elliptico-sphericis e geniculis
radicellas hyalinas emittentibus.
«The absence of fructification causes me to doubt if this is not an
abnormal state or a rampant variety of G. corallina (Ag.).”
3. Gigartina conferta (Schousb.), fronde cartilaginea, filiformi, vage
ramosa, ramis fasciculatis confertis, ramulos abbreviatos patentes
apice incrassato-ovoideos undique emittentibus.
4. Gigartina gaditana (Montag.), fronde cartilaginea, filiformi, di-
chotoma, aculeis simplicibus brevissimis subsecundis utrinque
attenuatis obsita.
Probably closely allied to the Spherococcus armatus (Agardh).
5. Delesseria interrupta (Ag.), fronde membranacea tenerrima, in-
terrupte costata, lineari, dichotoma, apice furcata rotundataque.
This second number fully supports the high character which had
been obtained by its predecessor, and we trust that the work will
receive that support which it deserves from the botanists of Britain.
PROCEEDINGS OF LEARNED SOCIETIES.
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY.
June 23, 1840.—William Yarrell, Esq., V.P., in the Chair.
The Rev. F. W. Hope read a paper entitled ‘‘ Observations on
the Stenochoride of New Holland, with descriptions of new species.”
Of this paper the following is an extract :—
Fam. Stenocuorip, Leach.
Type of the family Stenochorus semipunctatus, Fab.
Section 1. Armigeri.
Antennis thoraceque spinosis, apicibus elytrorum bidentatis.
Sp. 1. Srenocnorus eieas. ‘Sten. ater thorace spinoso inequali,
elytris basi nigro flavoque variegatis. .
Antenne corpore fere duplo longiores, articulis ternis primis nigri-
cantibus, reliquis fusco-ferrugineis, articulis intermediis apice spi-
nosis. Caput atrum antice rufo-ciliatum palpis ferrugineis. Tho-
rax utringue spinosus spinis brevibus, tuberculatus, rugosus et ater.
Elytra bidentata, basi nigro flavoque variegata, varioloso-punctata.
Corpus infra nigrum abdomine postice piceo, femoribus atris,
tibiis tarsisque fusco-brunneis et tomentosis.
Long. lin. 183; lat. lin. 54,
Hab. In interiori parte Nove Hollandie.
This magnificent species, the largest of the genus, was given to
Captain Roe, when engaged on his survey of the Australian coast ;
it was labelled as coming from the inner country.
In Museo Dom. Hope.
Sp. 2. Srenocuorus tatus. Sten. fusco-brunneus, thorace cinereo-
Zoological Society. 59
tomentoso, elytris flavo brunneoque variegatis. Caput cinereum.
Antenne longitudini corporis vie equales. Thorax utrinque spi-
nosus, spinis acutis, tomentosus et rugosus, antice binis tuberculis
rubro-piceis insignitus. LElytra flavo-brunnea maculisque nigris
variegata, macula suturali magna lunulata, ad apicem posita, corpus
infra nigrum, pectore pedibus brunneo-piceis, tarsisque aurico-
matis.
Long. lin. 15; lat. lin. 4.
Hab. In Nova Hollandia circa Flumen Cygneum.
In Mus. Dom. Hope.
Sp. 3. SrenocHoRvus LONGIPENNIS, Sten. atro-brunneus, thorace
cinereo, elytris antice flavo variegatis, postice, piceo-brunneis.
Antenne longitudine corporis, fusco-flave et tomentose. Thorax
utrinque spinosus spinis acutis, ad humeros elytrorum curvatus,
rugosus, tuberculo nigro et glabro in medio disci posito. lytra
elongata ad apicem parum attenuata, antice brunnea, lineis flavis
longitudinalibus variegata, postice reliqua parte disci atro-brunnea.
Corpus infra fusco-brunneum, femoribus tibiis pallidioribus et to-
mentosis, tarsisque auricomatis.
Long. lin. 13; lat. lin. 34.
Hab. Van Diemen’s Land.
Sp. 4. Srenocuorus Mircuerir. Slen. straminicolor, caput ni-
grum antennis flavis, thorace atro-cinereo, elytrisque flavo brun-
neogue variegatis. Caput atrum thorace bispinoso, spinis utrinque
minutis, disco rugoso atro-cinereo. Elytra pallide flava sutura
brunneisque maculis variegata. Corpus infra rubro-brunneum an-
nulis abdominis aurato-tomentosis, femoribus et tibiis concoloribus
tarsisque aurato-spongiosis.
Long. lin. 12; lat. lin. 3}.
Hab. In Nova Hollandia.
This singularly marked insect I have named in honour of Sir T.
Livingston Mitchell, the author of one of the most interesting works
which has yet appeared respecting Australia.
Sp. 5. Srenocuorvus trrmacutatus. Séen. pallide flavus, antennis
pedibus luteis thorace cinereo elytrisque nigro maculatis. Caput
piceo-brunneum. Antennis flavis sparsimque tomentosis. Thorax
utringue spinosus, spinis brevibus, rugoso-tuberculatus et argenteo-
cinereus, scutellum flavum. Llytra ad basin nigra, macula magna
ovali pallide flava, ante apicem in singulo posita. © Corpus infra
rubro-fuscum et argenteo-tomentosum. Pedibus luteis.
This elegant species I received from Captain Roe ; it was captured
at the Swan River Settlement.
Sp. 6. Srenocnorus opscurus, Donovan. Sten. thorace rugoso
spinoso, fuscus elytris antice punctato-rugosis, postice levibus ni-
tidis apice bidentatis.
Long. lin. 11; lat. lin. 3.
This species appears to be of rare occurrence. I have seen only
three specimens; all of them were from Van Diemen’s Land.
60 Zoological Society.
Sp. 7. Srenocuorvs puncratus, Donovan. Sten. thorace spinoso,
Suscus, elytris punctatis antice subrugosis, apice bidentatis maculis
tribus flavis.
Long. lin. 11; lat. lin. 23.
This species I obtained at the sale of the late Mr. Donovan’s in-
sects; it was labelled as received from Van Diemen’s Land. ‘The
colour of this species in Donovan’s plate is not dark enough; the
variety with the basal and medial spots united on the elytra, is by
no means uncommon; the species is also liable to vary considerably
in size; a small specimen measured only 84 lines long and 2 in
width.
Sp. 8. Srenocnorvus semiruncratus, Fabricius. Sten. thorace
spinoso, fuscus, elytris antice punctato-rugosis, flavo-fasciatis,
postice levibus, apice bidentatis macula flava. Vid. Oliv. 4—
67. p. 37, 48; Stenoch. 69. tab. 2. f. 19; Enc. Méth. 5. p.
303, 56; Schonherr. Syn. Ins. vol. i. part 3. p. 404. species 9.
Long. lin. 11; lat. lin. 3.
The localities of ‘ Brasilia’ and ‘ Nova Hollandia’ are mentioned by
the latter author ; there cannot exist a doubt that the former locality
is erroneous. The species is subject to great variation. I mention
some of the most particular.
Var. a. Elytris (long. lin. 8 ; lat. lin. 1%) mediis trimaculatis, maculis
binis antice parvis, postica triplo majori.
Var. (6. Elytris (long. lin. 7 ; lat. lin. 14) late flavo-fasciatis maculis
nigris aspersis.
Var. y. Elytris (long. lin. 11; lat. lin. 3) late flavo-fasciatis nigris
binis maculis notatis, apice late flavo, spinisque concoloribus, an-
tennis pedibusque pallidis.
This is probably an immature specimen. It is by no means un-
common.
Sp. 9. Srenocuorvus aneustatus, DeJean. Sten. valde elongatus,
parallelus, pubescens, fusco-cinereus, thorace subplicato, conico,
lineis duabus albidis. Elytris macula laterali antica, elongata,
Susca.
Long. lin. 10; tot. 15.
In Museo M. M. DeJean et Gory.
The above description is taken from the Voyage De |’Astrolabe,
by Mons. Boisduval, vide part 2. p. 475.
Sp. 10. Srenocnorus unpuLatus. Sten. nigro-brunneus, an-
tennis aurato-tomentosis thorace supra tuberculato et concolori,
medio disci macula elevata rubro-picea et polita. Scutellum au-
reo-tomentosum. Elytra fusco-brunnea, fasciis binis mediis un-
dulatis pallide flavis upicibus concoloribus. Corpus infra rubro-
piceum pedibus aureo-tomentosis.
Long. lin. 10; lat. lin. 24.
This species inhabits New Holland, and was sent me by Captain
Roe from the New English Settlement at the Swan River in Au-
stralia. I must remark that in this species the spines at the apex
of the elytra appear unusually short, those at the suture are scarcely
Zoological Society. 61
perceptible. I imagine therefore, as the insect is unique and much
damaged, that probably they have been broken off.
Sp. 11. Srenocnorvs assiminis. Sten. affinis precedenti, rufo-
brunneus, antennis concoloribus et tomentosis. Thorax- -rufo-
piceus, supra tuberculatus tuberculis quinque elevatis majori-
bus ita dispositis :|: reliquis minoribus.. Elytra rufo-brunnea,
fascia elongata irregular undulata et flava apicibus flavo-macu-
latis. Corpus infra rufum femoribus et tibiis concoloribus et
sub-tomentosis tar els auricomatis.
Long. lin. 103; lat. lin. 22.
I received this insect from Van Diemen’s Land.
Sp. 12. Srenocnorus acanruocerus, MacLeay. Sten. fusco-fer-
rugineus capite punctato ; antennis rubris, articulo 3%, 4t, 5'°
et 6'° apice spinosis ; ore rubro; maaillis elongatis, apice ciliatis
membranaceis ; palpis securifor mibus ; thorace obscuro utrinque
unispinoso margine antico tuberculisque dorsalibus utrinque pos-
tacoque semicirculari rubris ; scutello rubro; elytris rubris fas-
cus tribus nigris undatis, ad basin inter lineas elevatas subcre-
natis, apicemque versus punctatis, apice bidentatis ; corpore sub-
tus nigro nitido tomentoso pedibus rubris.
In Mus. Dom. Macleay.
Sp. 13. Srenocnorvs porsALis, MacLeay. Sten. fulvo-piceus ca-
pite angusto labro palpisque testaceis ; vertice canaliculato ; tho-
race meequaliter rugoso eminentia media ovali glabra tribusque
aliis utrinque imconspicuis ; elytris bidentatis subelevatis inter-
stitusque punctatis macula Wieden suturali testacea antice sub-
emarginata ; antennis subtus villosis, articulis apice haud spinosis;
corpore pedibusque piceis ; femoribus incrassatis.
In Mus. Dom. MacLeay.
Hab. In Nova Hollandia.
Section 2. Tubericolles.
Antennis spinosis, thorace tuberculato haud spinoso, apicibus
elytrorum bidentatis femoribusque incrassatis.
Sp. 14. Srenocnorus unieutratus, MacLeay. Sten. fuscus capite
cum antennis villosis, thorace inequali rugoso, tuberculato. Ely-
tris depressis crebrissime punctulatis, in singulo macula quadrato-
elongata, et lutea fere in medio disci posita. Corpus infra rubro-
Suscum tomentosum femoribus incrassatis et concoloribus, tarsis
infra flavo-spongiosis.
This species I received from the Swan River : it is subject to great
variation in size. A specimen similar to Mr. MacLeay’s Uniguttatus
measures in length, lin. 103; lat. lin. 2. It seems likely that Sten.
elongatus of DeJean is the same as the above species.
Sp. 15. Srenocnorus rHomBirEeR. Sten. affinis preecedenti at
multo minor. Fuscus, antennis et corpore sparsim flavo-tomento-
sis, capite haud villoso, rubro. Thorax inequalis et tuberculatus.
Elytra depressa bidentata, macula quadrato-elongata lutea fere
62 ‘Loological Society.
in medio disci posita. Corpus infra rubro-piceum nitidum, binis
ultimis segmentis pallidioribus. Pedes rubro-fusci femoribus pa-
rum incrassatis tarsisque infra aureo-tomentosis.
Long. Jin. 7.; lat. lin. 1}.
I received this species in a box of insects from Mr. Charles Dar-
win. Its true locality is either Sidney or Van Diemen’s Land.
I consider it quite distinct from Mr. Sharpe MacLeay’s Stenocho-
rus uniguttatus.
In Mus. Dom. Hope.
Sp.16, Srenocnorus Tunicatus, MacLeay. Sten. flavus antenna-
rum articulis duobus primis nigris quinto apice septimo nonoque
nigris ; thorace subcylindrico utrinque unidentato, supra quadri-
tuberculato tuberculis anticis majoribus ; elytris apice flavis uni-
dentatis, parte basali ultra medium subviolaceo-flava linea ebliqua
terminata ; corpore pedibusque flavo-testaceis.
In Mus. Dom. MacLeay.
Sp. 17. Srenocnorus ruprires, Boisduval. Sten. elongatus paral-
lelus ; antennis pedibusque rufis ; thorace angustiort, cylindrico,
tuberculato, coleopteris dilute fuscis ; apice spinosis, punctis cre-
bris impressis, macula communi maxima irregulari, nigra notata,
altera postica, scutelloque flavis.
Long. lin. 104; lat. lin. 24.
Described from Mons. Boisduval’s ‘ Voyage de |’ Astrolabe,’ vid.
part ii. page 479. I had given the name of Undulatus to the species,
and had figured it before I was aware of its being described: the
sexes apparently differ considerably in size.
Sp. 18. Srenocnorus Roger. Sten. rubro-fuscus ; antennis pal-
lidioribus ; thorace tuberculato, elytrisque macula irregulari
flava notatis, alteraque apicali lutea, spinis apice brevibus, ex-
terno longiort. Corpus infra rubro-piceum nitidum pedibus con-
coloribus et tomentosis.
Long. lin. 63; lat. lin. 1}.
This species was sent to me from the Swan River by Captain Roe ;
it is named after that indefatigable and enterprising officer.
Section 3. Fissipennes.
Antennis spinosis, thorace inequali tuberculato seu denticulato,
apicibus elytrorum transverse truncatis, haud spinosis.
Gen. Corrocrercus*, Hope, Nov. Gen.
Caput antice rugosum, antennis spinoso-tomentosis. Thorax fere
cylindricus, tuberculatus. lytra parallela thorace latiora ad
apicem parum contracta, transverse fissa, haud spinosa. Cor-
pus infra convexum, antennis pedibusque fere ut in Sten. Roei
conformatis.
Type of the Genus, Stenochorus biguttatus of Donovan.
Sp. 1. Coprocercus sreurratus, Donovan, vid. pl. 2. fig. 7.
* Koptocercus, frem xox, scindo, and xepxos cauda.
Zoological Society. 63
Copt. biguttatus, thorace mutico, Jferrugineus, elytris antice punc-
tato-rugosis, testaceo-maculatis, bidentatis macula flava.
Long. lin. 8; lat. lin. 2.
I received this insect from Mr. Donovan, and therefore have no
doubt respecting the individual species. The elytra, according to the
above description, can scarcely be considered as bidentate; they
appear as if they were abruptly broken off at their apex. ‘The sexes
vary very much in size.
Sp.2. Coprocercus SEXMACULATUS. Copl. niger ; anlennis brunneis ;
thorace tuberculato et rugoso; elytris 6 maculis luteis notatis,
pedibus rufescentibus. Caput atrum antennis brunneis. Thorax
utrinque denticulatus, inequalis, rugosus, tuberculatus, macula
media elevata et glabra. Elytra nigra antice varioloso-punctata,
postice punctis minoribus. Sex-maculata, macula 1™ lutea paullo
infra basin, 2% fere media seu melius fasciata, 3"* apicali pal-
lidiore. Corpus infra cinereo-piceum ; pedibus rufo-brunneis.
Long. lin. 7; lat. lin. 13.
This species, which appears to have escaped the notice of ento-
mologists, is abundant. I suspect that the male sex will have the
denticulation on each side of the thorax more marked than in the
female described.
Sp. 3. Coprocercus untrasciatus. Copt. ater thorace inequali
tuberculato, elyiris nigris punctatis, et flavo-fasciatis, punctis
ternis, maculisque minutis in singulo, inter basin et medialem
fasciam positis. Corpus infra rubro-piceum ; pedibus concolori-
bus, aureo-tomentosis ; abdomine nigro, et nitido.
Long. lin. 6; lat. lin. 14.
The above insect I received from Captain Roe, of the Swan River
Settlement in New Holland.
Section 4. Denticolles.
Antennis tomentosis, thorace utrinque spinoso ; dorso dentato ;
elytris apice obtusis.
Gen. TracHELoracuys*, Nov. Gen.
Type of the Genus, Stenochorus fumicolor.
Caput exsertum, oculis prominentibus, antennis corpore breviori-
bus. Palpi maxillares mandibulis longiores. Antenne 11-ar-
ticulate, 1™° cylindrico parum deformi ad basim tenuiori et
externe crassiore, 24° brevi subcyathiformi, reliquis fere equa-
libus, at extimo minori, apice attenuato. Thorax convexus
utrinque spinosus, disco spinis armato. /lytra thorace quad-
ruplo longiora, depressa, ad apicem obtuse rotundata et inermia.
Pedes simplices, femoribus haud incrassatis.
Hab. In Nova Hollandia.
TRACHELORACHYS FuMICOLOR. T'rach. fusco-niger ; thorace utrin-
que spinoso, disco spinis quatuor fere in medio armato. Elytra
parallela marginibus undique elevatis ad basim crebre granu-
* The above word is formed of reeynros, collum, and exxis, a spine.
64 Zoological Society.
lata, granulis ad apicem e medio elytrorum magnitudine decres-
centibus. Corpus infra piceo-nigrum, pedibus pallidioribus et
tomentosis, plantisque aurato-tomentosis.
Long. lin. 104; lat. lin. 23.
This insect was obtained from a collection made in the vicinity of
Sydney.
TracHeLoracuys pustutatus. Trach. flavo-fuscus antennis to-
mentosis ; thorace concolori utrinque spinoso ; spinis binis fere in
medio armatis. Elytra marginata; pustulis nigris in lineis
sparsim dispositis. Corpus infra fusco-rubrum ; pedibus subto-
mentosis.
Long. lin. 8; lat. lin. 14.
The above insect was purchased out of a New Holland box,
along with various nondescripts ; most likely they were from Hobart
Town.
Section 5. Femorales.
Antennis tomentosis ; thorace utrinque spinoso, dorso dentato ;
elytris transverse sectis; femoribus incrassatis.
Gen. Meropacuys*.
Caput exsertum, antennis tomentosis articulis undecim articulatis ;
1™° fere ut in Trach. fumicolori, at externe crassiori et ovato ;
24 previ et globoso; 3"° triplo longiori; 4*° paullo breviori, re-
liquis gradatim increscentibus, extimo apice subacuto. Thorawr
antice et postice contractus, utrinque in medio spinosus; dorso
dentato. Hlyira depressa; thorace latiora postice latiora trans-
verse fissa. Yotum corpus supra et infra argenteo sericie asper-
sum. Femoribus valde incrassatis in medio fortiter globosis.
Meropacuys MacLeail. Merop. fusco-flava antennis flavis to-
mentosis, thorace concolori, utrinque spinoso, maculis binis atris,
antice et postice signato. Elytra aurato sericie aspersa, ad hu-
meros tuberculata, fascia nigricanti ante apicem posita. Corpus
infra rubrum nigro et argenteo variegatum. Pedes flavescentes ,
JSemoribus globosis, nigro-maculatis ; tibits quatuor posticis medio
atratis ; tarsisque pallidis binis anticis fere omnino nigris sub-
tusque auri-comatis.
Long. lin. 8; lat. lin. 1$.
This beautifully sericeous insect is named in honour of William
Sharpe MacLeay, Esq., from whom we may shortly expect some
valuable communications relating to the entomology of Australia.
This genus appears to differ chiefly from Trachelorachys in having
both the sexes remarkably characterized by their incrassated femora ;
and it is probable that, as in other New Holland Stenochoridous ge-
nera, the length of the antenne will vary in the sexes.
MEROPACHYS TRISTIS. Merop. flavo-fuscus antennis tomentosis,
thorace aurato lanugine obsito. E lytra depressa, minulis pustu-
lis linear serie insignitis. Corpus infra rubro-piceum sericie
* Meropachys is from “xeos, femur, and rayue, crassilies.
Zoological Society. 65
aurato tectum. Femora valde incrassata ; tibiis rubro-testaceis ;
tarsisque infra auri-comatis.
Long. lin. 94; lat. lin. 2.
The above species was sent to me by Captain Roe from the vici-
nity of the Swan River settlement. There were also other species
allied to the present, but they arrived in too mutilated a state to
describe.
ConicoLueEs.
Scolecobrotus Westwoodii. ‘This species was described at p. 109
in the first volume of the Zoological ‘Transactions, and is admirably
figured at Plate XV. 2.5. It is remarkable for the joints of the
antenne, all excepting the first three appearing as if they were eaten
by worms. I have lately obtained from Mr. Fortnum the other sex
of this singular insect, and now briefly describe it. The antennz
are of a light coral-red colour, which may partly be occasioned by
abrasion. The joints of the antennz do not appear serrated as in
the former sex, excepting under a high magnifying power, and even
then it is scarcely perceptible. The spines at the apex of the elytra
are wider apart than in the specimen previously described ; in other
respects the insects accord almost entirely. I have reason to think
that both the above specimens are from the Swan River settlement,
and am not aware that any others are to be found in our metropoli-
tan, or even in the French collections.
Uracanthus, Hope. For the description of this genus, vide the de-
tails published at page 108 of the ‘ Zoological Transactions,’ where
only one species was described ; two more are now added.
Uracantuts PALLENS. Uracan. affinis precedenti at multo minor.
Cervino-brunneus thorace conico et albo-lineato ; elytris palli-
dioribus apicibus bidentatis.
Caput fronte forte canaliculata pubescenti-allida tectum. Tho-
rax alba linea utringue notatus, binisque tuberculis ad latera sub-
armatus, rugisque transversis constrictus. Elytra cervino-brunnea,
sericea, triangulis in singulo colore saturatiore inquinatis. Cor-
pus infra brunneo-sericeum, femoribus parum compressis.
Long. lin. 10; lat. lin. 2.
I had originally given the name of sericeus to this species, which,
as it seems common to all that are now known, I change it at pre-
sent to pallens. It was received from Van Diemen’s Land in 1839.
UracanTuus MARGINELLUS. Uracan. fusco-brunneus thorace albo-
lineato, elytrisque brunneo marginatis.
Tolum corpus supra tomentosum, capite porrecto et inter oculos
parum sub-canaliculato. Thorax rugis constrictus, tuberculo
ulrinque posito. Elytra albo-pubescentia marginibus brunneis
apicibus abrupte truncatis, spiis paruin prommentibus. Corpus
infra concolor, femoribus compressis.
Long. lin. 9; lat. lin. 13.
I received this insect from Captain Roe, of the Swan River. In
form it approaches a singular genus named Stephanops by Mr. Shuck-
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. F
66 Zoological Society.
hard; it is however decidedly an Uracanthus, and there can be little
doubt that Stephanops Nasutus of the above author belongs to my
section of the cone-necked-shaped Stenochoride.
Section Conicolles, Hope.
Genus SrroneyLurus, Hope.
Type of the Genus Sten. scutellatus, Hope.
Vide Zool. 'Trans., vol. i. p. 107.
Caput porrectum, oculis prominentibus. Antenne undecim articu-
late: articulus 1™"S crassus antice latior quam ad basim; 2°
brevi, reliquis gradatim increscentibus, compressis. Thorax
coniformis antice et transverse truncatus. Hlytra thorace la-
tiora, parallela apicibus rotundatis. Femora in utroque sexu
subincrassata, et parum compressa.
Sp. 1. SrronGYLURUS SCUTELLATUS. Strong. fuscus et tomentosus,
thorace flavo-ochraceo colore utrinque lineato medio disci ngri-
cante. Scutellum valde distinctum flavum. Elytra fusco-brunnea,
fasctisque undulatis parum distinetis notata. Corpus mfra sor-
dide fuscum, abdomine rubro-piceo, pedibus concoloribus et tomen-
tosis.
Long. lin. 124; lat. lin. 3.
The above insect I have received from various parts of New Hol-
land; as it is accurately figured, I have not given very full generic
details. I must remark, however, that in the sexes of this genus
the antenne vary very considerably, in one instance exceeding the
length of the body, whilst in the other sex they are shorter than
the elytra. These Longicorn beetles also vary much in size,
which is a remark that appears to apply to most of the Cerambycide
of New Holland. Can the long drought which sometimes prevails
in this country be regarded as the cause of dwarfishness, which is
certainly one of the striking features of the Coleoptera of Au-
stralia?
Sp. 2. SrroneyLturus varicornis. Strong. testaceo-fuscus,
antennis flavo-nigroque variegatis. Thorace tomentoso utrinque,
dentibus atris armato. Scutellum distinctum et album. Elytra
Susco-testacea fascus binis undatis parum distinctis. Corpus
infra concolor, pedibus tumentosis.
Long. lin. 54; lat. lin. 13.
There are in our English collections two other species belonging
to this genus; as however I have them not at hand, I must leave
others to describe them.
Genus Corrorrerus, Hope.
Type of the Genus Stenochorus Cretifer, Hope.
Vide Zool. Trans., vol. i. p. 107.
Caput porrectum inter oculos canaliculatum. Antenne compresse,
et fere ut in Strongyluro. Thorax obconico-truncatus, lateribus
rotundatis. H/ytra thorace latiora parallela; apicibus sub-ob-
Geological Society. 67
lique truncatis, seu abrupte sectis. Femora sub-incrassata et
q shige :
parum compressa; tibiis subincurvis.
CoproPTERUS CRETIFER. Copt. fusco-brunneus, capite albida
macula inter oculos posita. Thorax nigro-cinereus variis ma-
culis cretaceis notatus. Elytra brunnea maculis nigris aspersa,
in quibusdam speciminibus macule conjuncte fascias exhibent.
. Corpus infra fusco-rubrum maculisque variis albidis obsitum.
Pedes rubro-picei et tomentosi.
Long. lin. 103; lat. lin. 3.
This insect appears to be abundant at Sydney: there are also
other allied species undescribed, and from the vicinity of the Swan
River.
Genus Pizsarturivs, Hope.
Type of the Genus Stenochorus marginellus.
Vide Zool. Trans., p. 112. Genus 12.
Caput exsertum. Antenne valde compresse, 11-articulate. Thoraz
fere tetragonus angulis anticis parum rotundatis. E/ytra tho-
race paullo latiora parallela, interne spinosa, angulis externis
rotundatis. Femora antica quatuor vix incrassata, posteriora
minora; tibiis subincurvis.
Hab, In Nova Hollandia.
PIESARTHRIUS MARGINELLUs. Pvresar. flavo-fuscus antennis com-
pressis, tomentosis et pallidis. Thorax niger, lateribus flavo-
ochraceis. Scutellum distinctum et flavum. LE lytra testaceo-flava
marginibus interne et externe rubro-piceis. Corpus infra brunneo-
piceum lateribus pectoris annulisque abdominis utrinque flavo-
maculatis, pedibus pallidioribus.
Long. lin. 10; lat. lin. 23.
This insect I received from Captain Roe of the Swan River, and
it is, I believe, unique in our London cabinets. I have seen a second
species, but have not been able to obtain permission to describe it.
GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY,
April 29, 1840.—A paper was read, entitled, “ Description of the
mains of a Bird, Tortoise, and Lacertian Saurian, from the chalk ;”
by Richard Owen, Esq., F.G.S.
Bird—tThe three portions of Ornitholite were obtained by Lord
Enniskillen from the chalk near Maidstone, and were recognised by
him and Dr. Buckland as belonging to some large bird. One of
the bones is nine inches in length, and has one extremity nearly en-
tire, though mutilated, but the other is completely broken off. The
extremity, partially preserved, is expanded. The rest of the shaft
of the bone has a pretty uniform size, but is irregularly three-sided,
with the sides flat and the angles rounded: its circumference is two
inches and a quarter. The whole bone is slightly bent. The spe-
cimen differs from the femur of any known bird, in the proportion
of its length to its breadth; and from the tibia or metatarsal bone,
F 2
68 Geological Society.
in its triedral figure, and the flatness of the sides, none of which are
longitudinally grooved. It resembles most the humerus of the Al-
batross in its form, proportions and size, but it differs in the more
marked angles bounding the three sides. The expanded extremity
likewise resembles the distal end of the humerus of the Albatross,
but it is too mutilated to allow the exact amount of similarity to be
determined.
On the supposition that this fragment is really a part of the hu-
merus, Mr. Owen says, its length and comparative straightness would
prove it to have belonged to a longipennate natatorial bird, equalling
in size the Albatross.
The two other portions of bone have been crushed, but Mr. Owen
states that they belong to the distal end of the tibia, the peculiar
strongly-marked trochlear extremity of which is well preserved.
Their relative size to the preceding bone, supposing that specimen
to be part of a humerus, is nearly the same as in the skeleton of tae
Albatross. There is no bird now known north of the Equator with
which the fossils can be compared.
Tortoise.—The remains of the Chelonian Reptile consist of four
marginal plates of the carapace, and some small fragments of the
expanded ribs. The marginal plates are united by the usual finely-
indented sutures, and each is impressed along the middle of its up-
per surface with a line corresponding to the margin of the horny
plate which originally defended it. The external edge of each plate
is slightly emarginated in the middle. These plates are narrower
in proportion to their length than in any of the existing marine Che-
lonia ; and they deviate still more in the character of their internal
articular margin, from the corresponding plates of terrestrial Che-
lonia; but they sufficiently agree with the marginal plates of the —
carapace of the Emydes, to render it most probable that these cre-
taceous remains are referable to that family of Chelonia which live
in fresh water or estuaries.
Lacertian Saurian.—This fossil belongs to the collection of Sir
Philip Egerton ; and it consists of a chain of small vertebree in their
natural relative position, with fragments of ribs and portions of an
ischium and a pubis.
The bodies of the vertebra are united by ball and socket-joints,
the socket being on the anterior and the ball on the posterior part
of the vertebra; and they are further proved to belong to the Sau-
rian class of reptiles by the presence of many long and slender ribs,
as well as by the conversion of two vertebra into a sacrum, in con-
sequence of the length and strength of their transverse processes.
The remains of the ischium and the pubis are connected with the
left side of the sacrum, proving incontestably that this reptile had
hinder extremities as well developed as in the generality of Sau-
rians. Of these extremities, as well as of the anterior and of the
head, there are no traces.
Mr. Owen then proceeds to determine to which division of Sau-
rians, having ball and socket vertebral joints, the fossil should be
referred. In the crocodilian or Loricate group, the transverse costi-
Geological Society. 69
gerous processes are elongated, and three, four, or five of the verte-
bree which precede the sacrum are ribless, and consequently reck-
oned as lumbar vertebree: in the lacertian Sauriz there are never
more than two lumbar vertebre, and those which have ribs support
them on short convex processes or tubercles.
In the fossil from the chalk, the ribs are articulated with short
processes of the kind just mentioned, resembling tubercles, and they
are attached to the sides of the anterior part of all the vertebra,
except the one immediately preceding the sacrum. These charac-
ters, Mr. Owen says, in conjunction with the slenderness and uni-
form length of the ribs, and the degree of convexity in the articular
ball of the vertebrze, prove incontestably, that the fossil is part of a
Saurian, appertaining to the inferior or lacertian group.
The under surface of the vertebrz is smooth, concave in the axis
of the spine, and convex transversely. As there are twenty-one
costal vertebrz anterior to the sacrum, including the single lumbar,
the fossil, Mr. Owen observes, cannot be referred to the genera
Stellio, Leiolepis, Basiliscus, Agama, Lyriocephalus, Anolis, or Cha-
meéleon, but that a comparison may be instituted between it and the
Monitors, Iguanas, and Scinks. Tn conclusion, he states, that in the
absence of the cranium, teeth, and extremities, any further approxi-
mation of the fossil would be hazardous, and too conjectural to yield
any good scientific result.
June 10, 1840.—A memoir descriptive of a ‘‘ Series of Coloured
Sections of the Cuttings on the Birmingham and Gloucester Rail-
way,” by Hugh Edwin Strickland, Esq., F.G.S.
The author commences by expressing his regret at the irre-
coverable loss, which science has experienced, in full advantage not
having been taken of the valuable geological information, which has
been exposed by the railway cuttings in different parts of England
during the last ten years; and he suggests the propriety of each
line of railway being systematically surveyed by a competent ob-
server, while the cuttings are in progress.
Anxious to contribute towards so desirable an end, Mr. Strickland
gladly yielded to a request made to him by Captain Moorsom, the
chief engineer of the Birmingham and Gloucester Railway, to un-
dertake a geological survey of the line ; and he expresses his obliga-
tions to that gentleman and to Captain J. Vetch for the valuable as-
sistance they afforded him. The line was originally surveyed by
Mr. Burr, when only the trial shafts had been sunk, and before the
cuttings were commenced; but Mr. Strickland bears testimony to
the accuracy of the account which Mr. Burr laid before this So-
ciety.—(Geol. Proceedings, vol. ii. p. 593.
The direction of the railway ranges nearly parallel to the strike
of the strata, and therefore intersects only the new red sandstone
and red marl, the lias, and superficial detritus.
New red sandstone and red marl.—The lowest rock exposed be-
longs to the new red or bunter sandstone, resting on the anticlinal
70 Geological Society.
axis of the Lickey, ten miles south-south-west of Birmingham, and
one mile south of the termination of the altered rock, or Lickey
Quartz*. The sandstone is there thick-bedded, soft, and red, and
dips on the western flank about 5° west-south-west, and on the
eastern 5° east-south-east. In Grovely Hill, on the north-east of
the Lickey, it passes occasionally into a hard quartzose conglome- —
rate with a calcareous paste}; and at Finstal, on the south-west of
the Lickey ridge, the upper portion of the sandstone is light-coloured,
and contains obscure vegetable impressions, being a prolongation of
the stratum, with similar impressions, at Breakback Hill, on the
west of Bromsgrove {.
On each side of the Lickey, the sandstone is conformably overlaid
by red marl, which extends on the north-east to Birmingham$, and on
the south-west to Stoke Prior and the neighbourhood of Hadnor,
where the railway intersects a ridge of lias. On the north side the
marl is there cut off by a fault, but on the south, at Dunhamstead,
the following juncture section is exposed :—
(a.) Lias clay with contorted beds of lias limestone.
(b.) White micaceous sandstone, with numerous speci-
mens of a smooth oval bivalve Os aa
(c.)eliastettye. 92 USE CARES Si ee
(d.) Greyrmar? *) ~F8 200s pep, od Pare iad. aa
(e-jihedmmmnmles |... Bash oe ee emse Ig ie SN
Dip of the beds 5° north-north-east.
In the hill south of Dunhamstead, the grey marl (d) abuts against
the red marl (e) in consequence of a fault. For the next five miles
the railway traverses a valley of red marl, between the escarpment
of the lias and a ridge of Keuper sandstone. On the south-east of
Spetchley the strike of that sandstone is altered by a fault from
south by east to south-west, and a projecting angle has been pro-
duced which is intersected by the railway. ‘This stratum isa feeble
representative of the Keuper sandstone of Burg Hill, &c.||, con-
sisting chiefly of greenish marl with thin lamine of white sand-
stone, about twenty feet thick, with red marl above and below.
At Norton the railway ascends the las escarpment, and cuts through
a section exactly analogous to the one given above. A mile
further south the lias clay contains many calcareous concretions
abounding with fossils, including Plagiostoma giganteum, Modiola
* See Mr. Murchison’s Silurian System, p. 492.
+ Similar conglomerates occur in Worcestershire, Staffordshire, and
Warwickshire.—Silur. Syst., p.42. Geol. Trans., 2nd Series, vol. v. 347.
t Geol. Trans., 2nd Series, vol. v. p. 341; Proceedings, vol. ii. p. 564.
§ The red marl extends from Birmingham along the London railway as
far as Berkswell, forming the basin, in which occurs the lias outlier of
Knowle south-west of Berkswell. The true boundary of the sandstone and
marl in this district has been only recently ascertained; it ranges from
Hewell Grange, nearly north, by Cofton Hacket to Northfield, and thence
north-east to the south suburbs of Birmingham.
|| Proceedings; vol. ii. p. 503. Geol. Trans., 2nd Series, vol. v. p. 332.
Geological Society. 71
minima, and a coral. At Abbot’s Wood the fissile sandstone at the
base of the lias is again exposed, having been brought up by a fault.
At Defford and Eckington the lias clay encloses numerous speci-
mens of Pachyodon Listeri (Stuchbury), or Unio Listeri of Sowerby,
and Ammonites Turneri. At Bredon a higher portion of the lias
series was reached, and a different suite of fossils found, the most
marked being Pleurotomaria Anglica, Hippopodium ponderosum, Gry-
phea incurva, Nautilus striatus, and several species of Ammonites.
Between Cheltenham and Gloucester the lias has yielded great
abundance of organic remains, a considerable number of which are
considered to be new, and with the exception of Hippopodium pondero-
sum, Gryphea incurva, and one or two others, they are distinct from
the fossils of Bredon Hill; and at Hewlitt’s, east of Cheltenham, the
lias near the base of the marlstone presents another series of distinct
fossils. The lower lias, therefore, Mr. Strickland observes, affords
evidences of at least four well-marked successions of molluscous
faunz, in a vertical height of 400 or 500 feet, and unaccompanied
by any change in the mineral character of the deposits.
SUPERFICIAL DETRITUS.—The author then proceeds to describe the
deposits of superficial detritus, and he states, that they entirely con-
firm the views which he had previously entertained, respecting the
distinction between the ancient terrestrial alluvia in which bones of
mammalia occur, and the submarine drift which covers most parts
of the island*. .
He divides the detritus into fluviatile and marine, and the latter,
according to its origin, into local and erratic, and this, according to
its composition, into gravel with flints and without flints.
Marine erratic gravel without flints}—Commencing his details with
the Birmingham end of the line, Mr. Strickland shows, that these
accumulations occur extensively on all sides of that town, and at in-
tervals along the line of the railway till it approaches the valley of
the Avon. Mammalian remains appear to be totally wanting.
Chalk flints are so extremely rare in it around Birmingham as to
prove that the materials were transported from the north. At
Mosely it is upwards of 80 feet thick, and consists of rolled pebbles,
rarely exceeding 4 inches in diameter, of various granitic and
quartzose rocks and altered sandstones, imbedded in a clean ferru-
ginous sand; and a bed of sand 30 feet thick, without pebbles,
occurs in the middle of the gravel. Between Cotteridge and Wytch-
all is an erratic boulder, or shapeless mass of porphyritic trap,
about 5 feet by 4, with the angles slightly rounded. At the Lickey,
gravel analogous to that near Birmingham, but with a large pro-
portion of slate rocks, attains, on the line of the railway, a height of
387 feet, and at the Lickey Beacon of more than 900 feet. Sugar’s
Brook is the next locality noticed by Mr. Strickland, but from that
point no gravel occurs for sixteen miles. Near Abbot’s Wood is
another extensive deposit of quartzose gravel and ferruginous sand,
devoid of flints and resting upon lias.
* See Reports of the British Association, vol. vi., Sessional Meetings,
p- 61.
+ Northern drift of Mr. Murchison, Silur, Syst., p. 523.
7S Microscopical Society.
Marine erratic gravel with flints.—These accumulations commence
immediately south of the Avon. The village of Bredon stands on a
platform, seventy feet above the ordinary level of the Avon, com-
posed of lias with an uneven surface, and capped with 10 to 15
feet of this gravel. It contains no mammalian remains.
Fluviatile gravel.—The only example of this drift, on the line of
the railway, occupies the two opposite flanks of the Avon at Defford
and Eckington, north of Bredon. At these localities the surface is
a tabular platform which does not exceed forty-five feet above the
Avon, including a capping of ten feet of gravel precisely similar to
the flinty gravel of Bredon, but containing abundance of mammalian
remains. ‘They were chiefly found in the cutting north of Ecking-
ton, at the lower part of the deposit, and often on the surface of
the lias clay ; and are referrible to Llephas primigenius, Hippopotamus
major, Bos Urus, and Cervus giganteus ? On the north, or Defford
side of the Avon, the remains of Elephas primigenius and Rhinoceros
trichorhinus have been obtained. Associated with these bones are
numerous freshwater shells, agreeing with those found at Crop-
thorne *; the most abundant species being Cyclas amnica and C.
cornea. In endeavouring to account for the presence of these re-
mains at only one point in the line of the railway, Mr. Strickland
states that he can offer no other explanation than that previously
proposed by him +, namely, that after the beds of marine gravel had
been deposited and laid dry by the elevation of the land, a large
river or chain of lakes extended down the valley of the Avon, at a
height varying from twenty to fifty feet above its present course ;
and that the gravel previously accumulated by marine currents, was
remodified by the river, and mixed up with remains of mammalia
which tenanted its banks, or of mollusca which inhabited its waters.
Local gravel—This species of detritus occurs abundantly at Chel-
tenham, and consists exclusively of detritus from the oolites and lias
of the vicinity. No bones or terrestrial remains have been found in
it; and, therefore, the author assigns to it, in the absence of other
evidence, a marine origin.
Modern alluvia.—The only deposits of this nature mentioned in
the paper, are the peaty accumulations on the banks of the Avon
and its tributaries.
The memoir was accompanied by a copy of the Railway Section,
and of the Tewkesbury branch, and the junction branch from the
main line to the London and Birmingham Railway, presented by
Capt. Moorsom, but coloured geologically by Mr. Strickland.
MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY.
Jan. 27, 1841.—Richard Owen, Esq., President, in the Chair.
A paper was read by Mr. Bowerbank, “ On the Keratose or Horny
Sponges of Commerce.”’
The author, after noticing the labours of Dr. Grant and Dr. Fle-
* Silur. Syst., p. 555; and Proceedings, vol. ii. pp. 6 and 95.
+ Reports of British Association, vol. vi. Sections, p. 64.
Microscopical Society. 73
ming, who have described these bodies to be animals which are
** porous, with skeletons consisting of cartilaginous tubes destitute
of earthy spicula,” proceeds to state that he was induced to investi-
gate this division of the Sponges in consequence of having received
from Rupert Kirk, Esq., of Sydney, numerous specimens of Sponges,
among which were many exhibiting every appearance of being true
Keratose sponges, but which, upon a close examination with a high
microscopic power, were discovered to be abundantly furnished with
siliceous spicula. ‘The existence of spicula in these specimens led
the author to suspect their presence in the keratose sponges of
commerce. Upon examining these sponges, there were found to be
two well-marked species from the Mediterranean, and a third which
is obtained from the West IndiaIslands. ‘The first and commonest
species of Mediterranean sponge, is the Spongia officinalis of Lamarck.
When examined, before it has been cleaned and bleached by the
dealers, with a power of five hundred linear, the fibre from the exte-
rior presents the appearance of a smooth, light, amber-coloured thread ;
but when taken from the interior it is seen to be coated with a thin
and somewhat rugose film, containing minute granules, which the
author believes to be the incipient gemmules of the sponge, by which
the sponge is propagated, after the manner described by Dr. Grant
as occurring in other divisions of this class. The greater part of the
fibres consist of cylindrical transparent threads, frequently anasto-
mosing and varying considerably in their size. ‘This portion of the
tissue is destitute of spicula; but there frequently occur, dispersed
amid this form of tissue, large flattened fibres running in a straight
direction, and it is in these that spicula are found imbedded in the
centre of the tissue. ‘The spicula vary considerably in their size and
form, and are best obtained for examination by burning small pieces of
the sponge to a white ash, and washing this with dilute muriatic acid.
In the other sponges of commerce, spicula are found in equal abun-
dance. All the writers who have treated of Spongia officinalis have
described it as consisting of horny tubes ; but the author states this
to be an error, and proves the thread in all the species of the sponges
of commerce to be a solid horny fibre. The second species of Me-
diterranean sponge is described as being very similar in its external
characters, and in the size, form and arrangement of its fibres, to S.
officinalis, but is distinguished from it by the possession of a beauti-
ful vascular tissue, which surrounds in great abundance nearly every
fibre of its structure, frequently anastomosing and running in every
possible direction over its surface. ‘This tissue is not imbedded in
the horny mass of the fibre, but is contained in a sheath, which closely
embraces it. In one of these vessels the author observed numerous
minute globules, exhibiting every appearance of being globules of
circulation analogous to those found in the blood of the higher classes
of animals. These molecules were extremely minute, the largest
being but the 16,666th of an inch in diameter, and the smallest the
50,000th of an inch in diameter. A similar vascular tissue is stated
to exist in a considerable number of the keratose sponges of Au-
stralia. The author concludes by some observations on the nature
74 Miscellaneous.
and structure of the spicula of sponges in general, and endeavours
to prove that they bear no relation to the raphides of vegetable
bodies, but are truly of animal origin, having their internal surfaces
lined with an animal membrane, which becomes converted into a
thin film of carbon when the spicula are exposed to the action of the
blow-pipe.
The author illustrated his paper by numerous drawings of the tis-
sues described, and exhibited the specimens from which they were
delineated.
Mr. Owen exhibited the specimens of the teeth of the Labyrintho-
don, described by him at the last Meeting of the Geological Society,
and he explained the peculiarities of the dental structure in that
extinct species of Reptiles.
Mr. Varley called the attention of the Society to a new form of
Microscope, which he had constructed with a view to facilitate the
examination of minute living objects.
MISCELLANEOUS.
Absorption of Liquid Solutions by the Sap-vessels of Plants.—M.
Dumas reported to the Academy of Sciences on the 30th November,
1840, that by the absorption of various fluids, Dr. Boucherie had dis-
covered a method of rendering wood more durable, of increasing its
tenacity and hardness without impairing its elasticity, and of im-
parting to it various permanent colours and odours.
Dr. Boucherie found that the attractive power of the vegetable
tissue was sufficient to carry from the base of the trunk to the leaves
all the fluids he wished to introduce, provided they were kept within
certain limits of concentration. He cut a tree near the base when
in full sap, and plunged it into a tub containing the fluid he wished
to introduce, and in a few days he found that it had risen even to the
most elevated leaves, and had penetrated all the tissue except the
heart of the tree. The same result followed whether the trunk was
in an erect or inclined position. It was not even necessary to divide
the trunk completely, for a cavity hollowed out at its base, or a
groove made with a saw over a considerable part of the circumfe-
rence, was sufficient, when the cut part was brought into contact with
the fluid, to allow a rapid absorption to take place.
Dr. Boucherie ascertained that the absorption of a solution of
pyrolignite of iron containing some creosote augmented the hard-
ness of wood and prevented its decay, while the penetration of the
wood with solutions of the earthy chlorides and various saline mat-
ters rendered it less combustible.
Various colours were given to wood by causing different substances
to be absorbed in succession. Pyrolignite of iron by itself gave the
wood a beautiful brown colour; when it was followed by an astringent
fluid containing tannin, a blue, black, or gray colour ensued ; and
when succeeded by ferrocyanate of potash, a deep Prussian blue re-
Miscellaneous. 75
sulted. In the same way the absorption of acetate of lead and of
chromate of potass imparted a yellow colour, and by the mixture of
several of these substances a still greater variety of shades was pro-
duced.
Different odours were in a similar manner given to various kinds
of wood.
The Highland Society of Scotland have offered a gold medal or
thirty sovereigns as a premium for the best account of a series of
similar experiments.
Congres Scientifique de France.—The Ninth Meeting of this Asso-
ciation, which in its plan and objects resembles the British Associa-
tion for the Advancement of Science, will be held at Lyons, and will
occupy twelve days. The Session will open on Wednesday, Sep-
tember Ist, 1841, in the great hall of the Palais des Terreaux. The
Association will be particularly gratified by the attendance of men
attached to science, literature and the arts, from the British Isles.
Eels killed by the late Frost.— Although it is well known to natural-
ists that the Eel, otherwise tenacious of life, cannot bear excessive cold,
I conceive that the following facts upon the subject, though by no
means so satisfactory as could be wished, are worthy of being placed
on record. On the 6th, 7th, and 8th of the present month (Febru-
ary, 1841) great quantities of this fish in a dead state floated down
the river Lagan to the quays at Belfast. Here upon these days, and
along the course of the river within the tide-way, collecting dead
eels was quite an occupation at low water, and to the numerous
loiterers about the quays proved in some cases more productive for
the time than the “‘chance jobs” by which they gain a livelihood. One
individual earned his two shillings for nearly a bushel-full*, and
another, selling them at the same rate, gained five shillings for what
he collected at the fall of a tide. Three examples sent me by my
friend Edmund Getty, Esq., were the common Eel (Anguilla acuti-
rostris, Yarr.), in excellent condition, and in all respects of ordinary
appearance; one was about a foot, the others were two feet in length.
They were found dead of all sizes up to the largest.
The only experiment I heard of being made on these Eels was,
that four of them, of gradations in size from a foot to two feet in
length, were placed in water warmed to a high summer tempera-
ture, to see if they would revive; but, as may be anticipated of such
a proceeding, none of them exhibited any signs of life. A highly
interesting fact connected with this fatality among the Eels is, that
on the three days on which they perished from the cold, the ther-
mometer was nearly ten degrees higher than it had been for three
days successively in the preceding month, when none were known
to have suffered from it. At that time the wind was south-west and
moderate. When they were killed there was a gale from the east,
accompanied by hard frost: to the human body the cold was at this
* The price of Eels in our market is three-pence or four-pence per pound.
76 Miscellaneous.
time extreme and piercing, though at the period mentioned in
January it was not disagreeable. At low water a great extent of mud-
banks is uncovered at the part of the river where the Eels were killed,
and at this season these fishes are believed to be imbedded in the
mud; they would seem to have suffered from the intense cold arising
from the rapid evaporation produced by the piercing east wind.
Since January 1814, such a sensation of extreme cold has not
been experienced at Belfast, and at that time, as I am informed by
Mr. Hyndman, great quantities of Eels met with a similar fate in the
river Lagan. They were seen by him floating down the stream dead,
at the Long Bridge in this town. It is most probably in reference
to 1814 that Mr. Templeton has remarked in his ‘ Catalogue of Irish
Vertebrate Animals,’ that ‘‘ great numbers of eels inhabiting the
shallow watery mud on the shore of Belfast Lough were killed during
a severe winter*.” It is worthy of remark, that at the time just
mentioned the wind was also easterly. In the Meteorological Report
for January 1814, published in the ‘ Belfast Magazine,’ it is ob-
served, ‘‘ The continuance of the wind in the east for a longer time
than usual has produced such a degree of cold as the oldest person
in Ireland now alive cannot remember. Notwithstanding the rise of
the tide, a sheet of ice has covered the bay of Belfast, strong enough
to enable people to walk about with perfect safety over the channel,
and full half a mile from the quays. Lough Neagh has also been so
much frozen as to allow people on horseback to ride into Ram’s
Island, situated two miles from the shore.” I have been credibly in-
formed that at the same period laden carts were taken over the ice to
the island, and that some sportsmen of the neighbourhood hada drag
or trail hunt upon the lake, and followed the hounds on horseback.
A lighter, when coming to Belfast on the 6th or 7th of the present
month, on breaking the ice at a part of the river where the banks
‘are not uncovered to the same extent at low water as where the eels
were chiefly killed, exposed a number of them, which, though not
dead, were so weak as to be unable to offer any resistance, and were
lifted into the vessel. On the days which proved fatal to the eels
here great numbers were likewise found dead in the bay at Dun-
dalk.
The minimum thermometer at the Belfast Library indicated on the
morning of
aay, x Noe sabe Wind south-west; mode-
9, J ite50) ot:
Ht el
February 6, pg ._~ (Wind very high from the
oe ds Ais DIO t= da
eT B 0727 Sp) a ere
Wa. THomeson.
Donegal Square, Belfast, Feb. 1841.
* Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. i. New series.
Miscellaneous. 77
OBITUARY :—FRANCIS BAUER, ESQ.
Mr. Bauer was born at Feldsberg, in Austria, on the 4th of Octo-
ber, 1758, and died at Kew on the 11th of December, 1840. He
lost his father (himself an artist) at an early age, and was initiated,
with his brothers, in the ready use of the pencil, under the guidance
of an excellent mother. He came to England in the year 1788, with
the intention to proceed to Paris, where, notwithstanding the pro-
gress of the Revolution, artists and scientific men were allowed to
follow their pursuits without molestation. His brother Ferdinand,
scarcely less skilful in the art of delineating botanical subjects, and
who subsequently accompanied Mr. Robert Brown as draughtsman on
Flinders’s voyage, had already been with Sibthorpe in Greece, and was
then at Oxford, busy in completing the ‘Flora Greca.’ Sir Joseph
Banks soon appreciated Mr. Bauer’s rare talents, as well as his singu-
lar sagacity in botanical physiology, and prevailed on him to remain
in England. Sir Joseph, in fact, settled on him 300/. per annum for
life, on condition that he should reside at Kew, as botanical painter
to the Royal Gardens, which were then rapidly advancing to a high
state of perfection. The munificence of Sir Joseph enabled Mr.
Bauer to pursue the bent of his genius independent of the public and
of booksellers; and numberless beautiful illustrations of the rare
plants introduced in rapid succession at Kew, by the many travellers
and navigators of the reign of George the Third, were the result—
works now deposited with Sir Joseph Banks’s library at the British
Museum, and which all who have examined must acknowledge to be,
for accuracy of delineation and colouring, elegance of execution, as
well as for physiological and anatomical truth, unexampled at that
period. Mr. Bauer was also appointed drawing-master to the Princess
Elizabeth ; but he was a better philosopher than courtier, and his
services, which were given gratuitously, were soon dispensed with.
At that time he was occupied on the Heath tribe, then in course of
introduction, chiefly from the Cape, by Menzies. Engravings were
made from these drawings, and Queen Charlotte and the Princess
used to colour them under his superintendence. These were after-
wards sold by public auction, with other of Her Majesty’s effects!
Towards the end of the last century, Mr. Bauer commenced his
illustrations of Orchideous plants, since published by Dr. Lindley.
He subsequently turned his attention to the diseases in corn, in which,
from his skill in the use of the microscope, he made discoveries of
great importance to agriculture, and therefore to mankind; and
we may here state, that the only money which he received during his
long life, beyond the above-mentioned income, was fifteen guineas,
which the editor of one of the cheap publications of the present day
sent to him for some short papers on the smpt in wheat.
In 1816, the late Sir Everard Home, being engaged in some re-
searches respecting the anatomical structure of the foot of the com-
mon house-fly, communicated the difficulties he experienced to Sir
Joseph Banks, who immediately introduced him to Mr. Bauer. This
led to an intimacy of the most lasting and most useful kind. Mr,
Bauer solved every difficulty, and, at the suggestion of Sir Everard,
entered on a number of other anatomical inquiries, the results of which
78 Miscellaneous.
were published by Sir Everard in the Transactions of the Royal So-
ciety. The most remarkable of these were his dissections and draw-
ings of the common red earthworm, the lampreys, conger-eel, Mexi-
can Proteus, metamorphosis of the tadpole, generations of oysters
and muscles, process of incubation from the egg to the perfect
chicken, the eye, structure of brain, nerves, blood, lungs, urethra,
and muscular fibre—some of which labours have led to great improve-
ments in the treatment of diseases, and consequent alleviation of hu-
man suffering; and all display an unrivalled degree of skill, perse-
verance, and philosophical acumen, sufficient to have conferred on
him the highest fame, had such been his aim. At the suggestion of
Sir Everard Home, George the Fourth resolved to establish a Bota-
nical Museum at Kew, which was to be entrusted to Mr. Bauer.
The house now belonging to the King of Hanover was purchased for
this purpose—the shelves were prepared—all the botanical books in
the King’s library were to be removed there, and some had, in fact,
been sent down, when, unfortunately, a dispute arose respecting the
land, to which the Commission of Woods and Forests laid claim;
and some artillery waggons driving off with the book-cases gave
Mr. Bauer the first intimation that the plan had been abandoned.
About this period Mr. Bauer made his superb drawings of the
Rafflesia Arnoldii (the plant of which a model in wax is preserved at
the rooms of the Horticultural Society). He still continued his de-
lineations of Kew plants, and latterly, more especially of the ferns
published by Sir William Hooker. He, at the same time, directed
his attention to many microscopical researches—such as the struc-
ture of cotton, flax, and wool, the hairs of the various races of men,
as well as of many animals, the red snow of Sir John Ross; and,
though little known to the public, he had so well established his re-
putation amongst the select in every walk of science, that rarely in-
deed would any man of science or any traveller of eminence pass
through London without visiting him, and no one returned otherwise
than gratified and instructed. Of Mr. Bauer, indeed, it has been
truly said, ‘‘that nothing prevented his acquiring an extraordinary
degree of fame, except his remarkably unobtrusive modesty—he
worked rather for the credit of others than for his own.”
Mr. Bauer continued, up to a late period, his microscopic researches
and drawings; but, unwilling to risk the chance of leaving any work
unfinished, he at last determined to rest, and to attempt no more.
Seated near his microscope, which long use had made almost essen-
tial to his happiness, he spent his hours in re-examining what his
pencil had so admirably perpetuated, and reviewed, in the monuments
of his labour, the history of his life. His was, indeed, a life of in-
cessant activity and usefulness. The motives which stimulate com-
mon men never influenced him! Vanity, selfishness and illiberality
were wholly foreign to his disposition; and that his innocent labours
had spared him from all self-reproach and remorse, his serenity, his
cheerful resolve to abide his time in peace, and his final departure
from this world under circumstances the most consolatory, full of
resignation, faith and hope, and free from sufferings, save the in-
creasing debilities of old age, sufficiently prove.—Atheneum, No. 687.
Meteorological Observations. 19
To the Editors of the Annals and Magazine of Natural History.
GENTLEMEN,
In the Cambridge Anatomical Museum there are two skeletons of
Seals, which possess the characters of the Halicherus Gryphus, given
in Bell’s ‘ British Quadrupeds.’ One of them was formerly in the
Museum of Dr. Macartney at Dublin, and was probably taken off
the eastern coast of Ireland; the other, of large size, and of ad-
vanced age, if we may judge from the state of its teeth, was cap-
tured in fishing nets off the Essex coast, a few years ago.
I have the honour to be, gentlemen,
Your obedient servant,
Caius College, Cambridge, Feb. 8, 1841. L. E. Pacer.
METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS FOR JAN. 1841.
Chiswick—Jan. 1. Hazy: fine with clouds. 2. Rain: clear and fine: hurri-
canes at night. 3. Thunder-storm about 7 a.m., accompanied with large and
vivid flashes of lightning, rain, hail and sleet, and high wind, which soon after
subsided into a perfectcalm. 4. Sharp frost : slight fall of snow : clear at night.
5. Densely overcast : snow: large lunar halo in theevening. 6. Hazy. 7. In-
tense frost. 8. Dense fog: severe frost. 9. Intense frost. 10. Overcast :
slight haze: rain at night. 11. Overcast. 12. Cloudy: clear. 13. Foggy:
rain: fall of snow. 14. Cold haze: rain: sleetand snow. 15. Rain. 16.
Thawing rapidly: occasioning inundations, the frozen crust preventing the water
from sinking into the earth. 17. Continued thaw. 18. Rain. 19. Overcast.
20. Cloudy and cold: sharp frost at night. 21. Frosty: fine. 22. Frosty: rain
at night. 23. Clear. 24. Boisterous: cold and dry. 25. Clear and frosty.
26. Overcast and fine. 27. Veryfine. 28. Cloudy. 29. Fine. 30. Hazy.
31. Foggy: rain.
Previously to the thaw, in the beginning of the month, the frost had penetrated
in some soils to a depth of 12 inches.
Boston.—Jan. 1. Cloudy. 2. Fine. 3. Cloudy: stormy with lightning and
rain early a.m. 4. Cloudy: snow early a.m. : stormy with rain p.m. 5. Stormy.
6,7. Fine. 8. Fine: thermometer 179-0 three o’clock p.m. 9. Fine: therme-
meter 28°-0 three o’clock p.m. 10. Cloudy: large fall of snow early a.m. 11.
Cloudy : snow early a.m. 12. Cloudy. 13. Fine: rainrp.m.e 14, 15. Cloudy.
16. Cloudy : snow early a.m.: rain r.m. 17. Fine. 18. Cloudy. 19. Cloudy:
rain early am. 20. Snow: snowr.M. 21. Cloudy: snow early a.m. 22, 23.
Fine. 24. Stormy: heavy snow-stormr.m. 25, 26. Fine. 27. Fine: beautiful
morning. 28. Cloudy. 29. Fine. 350. Cloudy. 31. Rain: rain early a.m.:
snow-storm p.m. N.B. The 8th of this month was the coldest day since Jan. 1, 1820,
Applegarth Manse, Dumfries-shire—Jan. 1. Slight showers. 2. Slight show-
ers: frost inthe morning. 3g. Snow-storm. 4. Snow-storm and frost. 5. Snow-
storm. 6. Fair: snow lying. 7. Snow-fall: frost very keen. 8. Snow-fall
slightly: frost keen. 9. Thaw, with slight snow. 10. Snow and frost again.
1J. Fair: snow lying: thawr.m. 12. Fair: but freezing hard. 13, Fair:
freezing. 14,15. Fair. 16. Storm of snow, sleet and rain. 17. Thaw: heavy
rain p.M. 18. Frost again: clear. 19. Frostagain. 20. Frost again: Aurora
borealis. 21. Thaw: drizzling rain. 22. Wet and boisterous. 23. Wet and
boisterous: slight snow-fall. 24. Fair: frosty: slight snow-fall. 25. Frost a.m.:
drizzle p.m. 26. Thaw and thickfog. 27. Shower in afternoon. 28. Fair and
fine: snow melting. 29. Drizzling. 30. Thick fog all day. 31. Clear and
cold: moist P.m.
Sun shone out 25 days. Rain fell 10 days. Snow 8 days. Frost 16 days.
Fog 2.
Wind north 2 days. North-east 5} days. East 2 days. LEast-south-east 33
days. South-east 1£ day. South-west 4 days. West-south-west 1 day. West
4 days. West-north-west 23 days. North-west 3 days. North-north-west 2 days.
Calm 8 days. Moderate & days. Brisk 3 days. Strong breeze 7 days.
Boisterous 4 days. Stormy 1 day.
| YOO"O
‘ava 26:0 | GS-1} 09-2] ‘wing L-92|0-LE\L.2E 19-82 /06-6€ L-Z€ | €-0F | €-SE | LP9.6Z| S£9-62) PP-6% | 10L:6% | £18.62 ggl-6z “Uz I
gf | |9% | a1. | 390. |tasax|unjeo| *# 's | PE| th) 6€| 8G | ah |2-0F| L-1V|8-0P| SE-0F | 02-0€ | 28-62 | $91-0€ | C61-0€ | o1z-08 | “1
Ae ea eeaea| he a Ovals? *s jureo} *M | *s lige |fer| Le| LE | ob |6-LE|Z-FV |-0F | €1-0€ | 80-0 | 06-62 | Z1Z-0€ | 1SZ-0£ | zgz-0f | ‘of C
fish Meforay ll °O2al Fatayel) eb ‘m |e] ‘NX | ‘mn | IP IFSP (S.9€) ZE | oF |0.9€|8-FH|L-LE} 11-0€ | O1-0€ | 08-62 | 9L1-0€ | 802-08 | zoz-0£ | “6%
9f Sareea | paces ieere's se [emu joupeo} “MH | ems | LEECH] Ih] 8% | PP 10-921 8:29 /8-LE| PI-O€ | 21-08 | €8-6z | 0S5-0€ | OO£-08 | zZE.0€ | °gz
CO) Peabo irra Cr a "wm [uupeo| “44 | smss | gE) 8} LP} PE | ES | 0-€F | 9-87 /€-LV| 26-62 | LL-6z | 89-62 | S10-0€ | S2Z-0€ | 0S0-08 | Lz
Ge jc ff tte Pott | sas furyea] MS | emsm | OF] OV] ge) EF | 6h | 0-10] 9-€V|L:ZP | 04-62 | 0L-62 | 69-62 | 886-62 | 000-0£ | 000-08 | *9%
1€ |‘ |ST- | 10. | €£0. | sms juyea| “| sms [f1z] SE\G-gz) ZE | OF |0-TE| 0-8E |S-1€| 88-62 | O1-0€ | 00-0€ | $61-0€ | 9EE-0€ | OSE.0€ | “Sz
ce yee tae] ot | tw | oN | UN | emu [79G] PE! PE} 9% | SE |0-9€| 0-2P|L-9€| €1-08 | LL-6z | 17-62 | 964-62 | 191-08 | 964-62 | “FZ
LE jor | | tee | COL. [tuna] x |*MN | mn | TE) BE] OF] ZE | Cp | €-PE| LHP | €-68 | S2-62 | $g-6z | $9.62 | 100-08 | 801-0€ | F80.08 | *€%
ve (Ge.3 | |Ol. | "* | ms jure) “MS | +s 1TGe) ab) Of) ZE | Ph | Z-0f| F-6E |S-PE | 01-62 | L6-62 | 96-62 | LST-0£ | CO£-0€ | 96£.08 | “7a@
Az) \eset [etaeeli see ive "MN jurjva| "MN | -m |F€z%| 68] 6z| SZ | BE | P-82| L:PE|8.62 | 0Z-0F | 6T-0€ | 00-0€ | PLE-0€ | G0S-0€ | O1P.0€ | *1z
Be ft fe | BZ. | oN | CN | CN | cmN | €% FGE] O€| BZ | PE |9.28| GLE |E-VE| VI-O€ | €0.0€ | £2.62 | 610-08 | Z8I-0£ | OG0.0€ | “0%
LE | ss |GO- | Zo. | LoS |*MNN jwyeo! “"N | emnn | 7Z| PE} SE} 8% | OF |0-GE| Lev |S-SE| 16-62 | 08-6z | SP-6z | 8LL-62 | 816-62 | Z18.63 | *61
ap tee | lpm | oc “x |uyeo| ‘aA : HE | Se G-Ep| Cf | Lb | L-9V| €-29 |8-9P | OL-6z | Z9-6z | 62.6% | $89-6% | SZL-6% | £2.66 | “SI
TH | tt | 8E | Zo. | OOT- [msm junpes| “MS | sas [fce Toh] oh) SF | a¢ |0-LE| 8-19 | PLP | PE-6% | 81-62 | 02-62 | $09.62 | 622-62 | ZE9.6% | “LT
go je | lop. | ggo. | e Satan “* | “yorMsty) | 00g “oY ? UOpuOT | ‘aatys-sonyundg a *yormstyo + uopuo'y "yao
: — ae a 2 eee ee See * ie Se ee ee re TOSAT GT
59 GT “*ureyy “PULL *JOJOWOULLIYT, “1aJOWIOIV
DOP tote pu Li Ws OOO Ee Oa 9 CORSO dsee 5 MOT COTA Wine 1) ee Onsen JAN, COTATI on SEPT) OA GIOIA CE EY er ChE rainy ar eYe1 tha
Ea AN NALS
AND
MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY.
No. 42. APRIL 1841.
X.—Contributions to British Actinology. By Enwarp
Forses, M.W.S., For. Sec. B.S., &c.
I. On Kapnea, a new Helianthoid Polype*.
In August 1840, I dredged on the east coast of the Isle of
Man, about a mile from Douglas Head, a very remarkable
and beautiful Zoophyte, of the family Actiniade. It came
from a depth of 18 fathoms, and the sea-bottom at the place
where it was taken is chiefly Millepora. To a fragment of
that coral it was adhering by its expanded base, and when
taken its tentacula were retracted. The body presented the
appearance of a lengthened cylinder arising from a broad-
spreading inflated base, and terminating in a round tentacu-
liferous disc, in the centre of which is a circular mouth. The
tentacula are very short, and have the aspect of squared tu-
bercles. They are arranged in three circles, sixteen in each
circle, those of the outermost or marginal row largest. Below
the tentacula and surrounding the disc is a granulated caly-
cine circle or belt ; and a Jittie below it, extending downwards
over a portion of the base, the body is invested by a woolly,
brown epidermis, which is eight-cleft or lobed at its upper
part. The base is somewhat lobed, and usually swelled out
with sea-water. The body and base are of a vivid vermilion
colour, the latter with darker longitudinal stripes. The ten-
tacula are somewhat paler and inclined to orange. They can
be drawn within the body, the upper part of which can be
retracted as low as the commencement of the epidermis.
When fully expanded, this animal was an inch in height by
one-fourth of an inch broad at the disc. It is rather an ac-
tive creature, changing its form often, but always presenting
more or less of a tubular shape, like a chimney-crock or steam-
boat funnel.
The shape of the tentacula and the presence of a regular
epidermis are the most remarkable features of this Actinea,
* Communicated to the Wernerian Society, January 23, 1841.
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vu.
82 Mr. E. Forbes’s Contributions
and distinguish it at once from all itstribe. Its general form
and calycine rim approach to the Actinea bellis and some other
species appertaining to the genus Actinocereus of Blainville.
The epidermis and the imperforate tentacula separate it from
Ehrenberg’s restricted genus Actinea, and the absence of
dermal pores from his Cribrina; neither of which divisions, as
defined by that naturalist, I am inclined to admit, and therein
agree with my friend Dr. Johnston. It is more nearly re-
lated to the Zoanthide than any known species of its family,
and presents a most interesting transition from the typical
Actiniade to that tribe. The regular form of the singular
epidermis would lead us to consider that appendage as an im-
perfect tube, and some curious analogies might result from
such a view. Both the number of the tentacula and of the
clefts or lobes of the epidermis being multiples of four, is im-
portant, as supporting the notion that four is the typical or
dominant number of the Actiniade, perhaps of all Zoophytes.
On account of the above characters, I have thought it right
to constitute a separate genus for its reception under the
name of Capnea (from carvn, a chimney), and define it thus:
Body cylindric, invested in part by a lobed epidermis, and
adhering by a broad base. Tentacula simple, very short, re-
tractile, surrounding the mouth in concentric series.
Sp. Capnea sanguinea, Forbes.
Tentacula arranged in three series, sixteen in each. Body
and dise scarlet. Epidermis brown.
Hab. Deep water, Irish Sea; among Millepora. PI.1. fig.
Wy cBs105, Cys
Il. A British Hippocrene.
The genus Hippocrene was constituted by Brandt for a very
curious and beautiful little Medusa observed by Martens in
Behring’s Straits, and which had been previously described
by Lesson, who had it from the Malanine Isles, under the
name of Cyanea Bugainvillii. Lesson afterwards re-named
it Bugainvillia macloviana, but Brandt’s generic name takes
precedence by right of priority. The generic character de-
pends on the production of the mouth into a sort of trunk,
which has wing-like appendages at its sides, and terminates
in four branching tentacular arms. From each of the appen-
dages runs a canal to the margin, where we find the tentacula
collected in fasciculi, and not surrounding the edge, or sepa-
rate, as in most allied Medusz.
When naturalizing on the north coast of Ireland with Mr.
Smith, of Jordan Hill, in 1839, I took a number of Medusze
to British Actinology. 83
of this genus by the towing-net, in Ballycastle Bay and at
Port Rush, and afterwards, during the same summer, found it
on the other side of Britain, at the mouth of the Frith of
Forth. My animal is larger, and differs in several particu-
lars from that described by Brandt and by Lesson, and I
regard it as anew species. In form it is almost globular, and
it measures an inch in length. The central cavity is oblongo-
quadrate, and occupies about one-half of the globular um-
brella. At its summit interiorly are seen four stomachal ap-
pendages, placed at right angles to each other so as to form a
cross. They are equal in size, of a yellow colour, squared
above, rounded below, and oblong. At their lower or oral
extremity are seen four slender white arms, which dichoto-
mously divide into numerous tentacula with globular tips.
These arms are very extensile, but are never sent from out the
cavity. From each of the four oral appendages or a/@ runs
a translucent canal to one of the four fascicles of the ten-
tacula, one of which is seen at each angle of the quadrate
cavitary opening. ‘These tentacula are very curious. They
are highly contractile, and spring from little arches of a glan-
dular appearance and a red colour, which form the bases of
the fascicles, and into which the four canals run. On mag-
nifying one of these arches, we find it to consist of two parts,
one (the upper) red, the lower white, and each of these to
consist of a great number of tubercles, which form the roots
of the tentacula. On each tubercle is a minute black ocular
dot. The tentacula are not all extended at the same time;
very often one, two or three only are sent out, but there ap-
pear to be more than a dozen pairs of tubercles in each arch.
Between the arches the margins of the cavity are straight, and
furnished with a semicircular lip or valve. The outer surface
of the body is smooth, and the appearance of the creature is
that of a crystal bubble, with four red dots round a square
opening, and a central yellow nucleus, having branched threads
suspended from it.
Sars, in his ‘ Beskrivelser,’ &c. has figured and described a
minute Medusa under the name of “ Cyt@is ? octopunctata,”
which evidently belongs to the same group with the above.
The known species of Hippocrene may be summed up as fol-
lows :-—
H. Bugainvillii, Brandt. (See figure in Petersburgh 'Trans-
actions for 1838.) Stomachal appendages as long as the
proboscis, eight, the four larger ones oblong, yellow, with
red centres. Tentaculiferous glands four, red and yel-
low, with pink tentacula. Umbrella in part pilose.
North Pacific.
G2
84 Mr. E. Forbes’s Contributions
H. brittanica, Forbes. Stomachal appendages as long as
the proboscis, four, equal, yellow. Tentaculiferous glands
four, red and white, with white tentacula. Umbrella
smooth. North of Ireland and East of Scotland.
H. octopunctata, Sars. (Beskr. og Jagt. p. 28. t. 6. f. 14.)
Stomachal appendages shorter than proboscis, four, un-
equal. Tentaculiferous glands eight, black. Umbrella
smooth. Coast of Norway.
Plate I. fig. 2 a, Hippocrene brittanica, of the natural size ;
2 b, its stomachal appendages and oral arms; 2 ¢, a tentacu-
liferous gland and tentacula.
III. New Species of Thaumantias.
The Medusz of this very natural genus, established by
Eschscholtz, have a simple stomachal cavity, from which pro-
ceed four simple canals; no arms, but a proboscidiform
mouth, which cannot be prolonged beyond the general cavity,
and a margin surrounded by tentacula, which are usually
bulbous at their bases, and are highly extensile. The species
of Thaumantias are small animals, and probably numerous in
the northern seas. Hitherto they appear to have been mostly
confounded under the Medusa hemispherica of Muller, which
is a prettily coloured species, already recorded as a native of
the British seas. I have never met with an example which I
could refer to Muller’s animal, but have found four very well
marked species which have hitherto been unrecorded.
1. Thaumantias pileata, nov. sp. Umbrella cap-shaped.
Oral peduncle and clubs of the vessels pink. Proboscis
four-cleft at the mouth, lobes acute. Eyes large, black
and yellow, on the bulbous origins of the twenty tenta-
cula.
This pretty species, the shape of which resembles that of a
Chinese hat, measured about an inch across. The clubs of its
vessels are small and narrow. It was taken at Port Rush,
on the north coast of Ireland, in June 1839.
Pl. I. fig. 3 a & b, Thaumantias pileata; 3c, its oral pe-
duncle.
2. Thaumantias Thompsoni, nov. sp. Umbrella hemi-
spherical, very convex. Proboscis four-cleft, lobes tri-
angular. Clubs of the vessels, proboscis and bases of
tentacula yellow. Eyes minute, black, on the triangular
bases of the sixteen tentacula.
PLI. fig. 4a & 6, Thaumantias Thompsoni; 4 c, one of the
tentacula.
to British Actinology. 85
Taken abundantly in Clifden Bay, Cunnemara, by Mr.
Thompson, Mr. Ball, and myself, in July 1840.
nulis supra ungulas albis; linea laterali nigra; pedibus annulo se-
Rev. L. Jenyns on British Mammalia. 261
cundo nigro posticé albo super-marginato notatis; apice caudz
(brevis et gracilis,) et linea pilorum pauld pendentium infra collum
ad pectus tendente, nigris. Habitat apud Tibetam Minorem. Va-
rietas dubia minor, cornibus extrorsim gyratis, cum angulo interiori
prominentiori.
11. O. Musimon, Linneus. O. cornibus compressis, ad basin tri-
quetrioribus, angulo interiori prominentiori; lunatim gyratis, et
sulcis transversim indentatis: colore pallido. Magnitudo Arietis
parvi, cauda brevi et magis villosa quam in specie precedente : pilis
rufo-brunneis; facie livida, cum capistro albo; ventre, clunibus, di-
midiisque artuum inferioribus, albis ; et linea laterali, cauda, pectore,
et membrorum plerumque dimidiis superioribus, nigris: macula tri-
angulari alba utroque lumbo szpe (semper?) conspicua. Habitat
apud insulas Corsice et Sardinie, et forsan provinciam Murcie in
Hispania.
12. O. Ophion, Blyth. O. Musimoni simillima, sed cornibus
retrorsis, apicibus accurvatis: pilisque brunneis, et non rufescenti-
bus(?). Habitat apud Cyprum, et forsan regiones alias Levantinas
13. O. Aries, Linnzus.
44 O: ? Ivalus Probaton, Ogilby. Magnitudo Arietum
maximorum, cauda paulim elongata : cornibus in specimine solo cog-
nito abnormaliter (?) rudimentalibus. Pilis castaneo-fulvis, et infra
albescentibus.
15. O. (Ammotragus) Tragelaphus. O. cornibus magnis subqua-
drangularibus, moderaté crassis, ad apicem compressioribus, sulcis
transversim indentatis; divergentibus et retrorsim curvatis, sed
prope basin rectis, apicibus acclinatis; colore pallido. Magnitudo
Cervi Dame superior, pilis flavescenti-brunneis ; collo jubato, et infra
cum pectore brachisque capillato, cauda elongata extremitate vil-
losa ; facie non convexa—ut in omnibus speciebus aliis, sinibusque
suborbitalibus nullis. Foemina semper (?) cornuta, cornibusque for-
tioribus quam in fceminis specierum ceeterarum hujus generis, que
seepe non cornutz sunt, sed plurimz cornua parva, tenuissima, et
compressiora ferunt, que in maribus junioribus aut curvata sunt,
aut sepe rectiora. Habitat apud Africe Septentrionalis montes
rupestre=.
EXPLANATION OF PLATE YV.
Fig. 1. Ovis Politi; 2. Do. side view ; 3. O. sculptorum; 4. Do. side view ;
5. O. californiana; 6. O. Nahoor; 7. O. Burrhel; 8. O. Gmelini;
9. UO. Vignei.
XXXII.—WNotes on some of the smaller British Mammalia,
including the Description of a New Species of Arvicola,
found in Scotland. By the Rey. Leonarp JENyns,
M.A., F.L.S., &c.
Tue following notes contain the results of some inquiries
and observations respecting our smaller Mammalia, made
since the publication of my ‘ Manual,’ and my several papers
262 Rey. L. Jenyns on some of
on the British Shrews, etc., in former volumes of this Maga-
zine.
(1.) Vespertilio Pipistrellus, and V. mystacinus.—M. de
Selys-Longchamps has favoured me with continental speci-
mens of both these species, which prove identical with ours.
I deem the circumstance worth mentioning, because, at the
time of publishing my paper in the Linnzan Transactions on
the common Bat of this country, it was thought by some
persons that the proof of its identity with the Pipistrelle of
the Continent, obtained from an actual comparison of speci-
mens, was still wanting; and I am not aware of such com-
parison having been yet made until now.
(2.) Vesperttho Daubentonii—1 am quite aware of the
error that I committed in my ‘ Manual, in confounding this
species with the V. emarginatus of Geoffroy ; and I have not
the slightest doubt of the correctness of Mr. Bell in referring
the bat which I described under this last name to the V. Dau-
bentonii.
(3.) Vespertilio edilis (Ann. of Nat. Hist., vol. ii. p. 73).—
MM. Keyserling and Blasius have given it as their opinion,
that the bat which I described as new under the above name,
is a mere variety of the V. Daubentonii*. 1 myself alluded
in my original paper to the possibility of this being the case ;
and I have now scarcely any doubt of the fact, as well from
what the above authors have stated, more particularly with
respect to the incision at the apex of the tragus occasionally
varying in the two ears of one and the same individual,—as
from the recent examination of a bat, undoubtedly referable
to the V. Daubentonii, in which there was a slight approach
to the form of tragus observable in the specimen on which I
founded the above species. This last bat was taken in Ireland,
and was kindly submitted to my examination by Mr. Thomp-
son of Belfast.
I still think, however, that, though I committed an error,
my paper will have been of use in calling the attention of
British naturalists to the fact of the tragus occasionally
varying in form in this manner, of which I do not apprehend
they were generally aware any more than myself.
(4.) Martes Foina.—Mr. Bennett and Mr. Bell have both
expressed doubts as to whether the common Martin be di-
stinct from the Pine Martin+, though the latter gentleman
has for the present kept them separate in his ‘ British
Quadrupeds.? Mr. Eyton, in a paper recently printed in
* See No. 29 of this Journal, p. 149.
+ See Mr. Bennett’s remarks on this subject in the ‘Gardens and
Menagerie of the Zoological Society,’ vol. i. p. 230.
the smaller British Mammalia. 263
this Magazine*, seems decidedly inclined to consider them
as but one species; and until lately I was myself strongly
disposed to embrace the same opinion. In the early part,
however, of the summer of 1840, Mr. Henderson, of Milton
Park, in Northamptonshire, was kind enough to send me
two specimens of the common Martin, killed in that neigh-
bourhood, both of which were young animals, and had pro-
bably been bred that year, as the milk-teeth had not yet been
supplanted by the permanent set, and the bones of the head
were very loosely united: nevertheless these individuals had
the cranium larger and heavier than that of an adult specimen
of the Pine Martin in Mr. Yarrell’s collection, who also showed
me several other crania of both species, of different ages, and
satisfied me that they were distinct. At the same time it is
evident, from the united observations of several naturalists,
that the colour of the breast is no distinguishing character,
and probably dependent upon either age or season. Mr.
Eyton is of opinion that the breast is yellow in the young
and white in the adult ; and this would be confirmed by the
specimens above alluded to, in both which this part was bright
yellow tinged with orange.
These individuals were of the same size, and measured 17
inches in length, exclusive of the tail, which was not quite 9.
The length of the cranium was 3 inches 4 lines; its breadth
across the zygomatic arches 1 inch 10 lines; its weight 4
drachms 38 grains.
(5.) Sorex rusticus, and S. Hibernicus.—Since the pub-
lication of my paper on the British Shrews+, in which I
first noticed the S. rusficus, and the Irish variety which I
provisionally termed S. Hibernicus, 1 have been favoured by
Mr. W. Thompson of Belfast with the opportunity of exa-
mining a large number of specimens of this last kind obtained
in Ireland, and am quite satisfied as to its being a distinct
species from the S. tetragonurus, but not from the S. rusticus,
which | had previously obtained in this country, and of which
I have since procured other specimens. In future, therefore,
these two species, the S. rusticus and the S. Hibernicus, must
be considered as the same; and I should have continued the
former name in preference to the latter, as being, on the whole,
more eligible, but for the circumstance of several specimens
of this shrew having been transmitted to naturalists, abroad
as well as at home, under the title of S. Hibernicus, and the
probability that, if it be now changed to that of rusticus,
it may entail some confusion. I have to request, therefore,
that the name Hibernicus be hereafter adopted for this species,
which, though not confined to Ireland, seems to be the com-
* No. 33, Dec. 1840, p. 290. + Ann. of Nat. Hist., vol. i. p. 417.
264 Rev. L. Jenyns on some of
mon species in that country, and much more abundant there
than in England, where it gives place in a great measure to
the S. tetragonurus. It has also been observed in very dif-
ferent localities in Ireland ; and one specimen sent to me by
Mr. Thompson was stated to have been taken in the county
of Antrim, at an elevation of 1200 feet above the sea.
Everything that I have stated in the paper above alluded
to, with respect to the characters of the S. rusticus, and the
distinguishing marks by which it may be known from the
S. tetragonurus, is applicable to the Irish Shrew, excepting as
regards the cranium (p. 420); and I must beg, that what I
have said on that point be considered as erased, having since
ascertained that I was led into an error by the examination
of a specimen, the cranium of which did not exhibit its true
form from the manner in which it had been prepared.
Moreover, it was this error which partly led me to regard
the English and Irish specimens of 8. Hibernicus as distinct.
In fact, the cranium of the species just named does not differ
from that of the S. ¢etragonurus, except in being much smaller.
The following are their respective dimensions :—
Length. Breadth. Height.
lines. lines. lines.
Cranium of a middle-sized S. tetragonurus 94 41 28.
— ofan old full-grown S. Hibernicus 7% 343 2
The dimensions indeed, generally, of this last species are so
much less than those of the former, that it is hardly possible
to mistake them, especially if attention be paid to the feet,
and also to the tail and attenuation of the snout. Perhaps I
have rather over-stated the average dimensions of the S.
Hibernicus in my former memoir (called there S. rusticus),
when I set them at “ hardly 23 inches ”; but I had not then
seen so many individuals. None of those submitted to my
examination by Mr. Thompson exceeded 2 inches and 24
lines; and I doubt whether in general the species much
exceeds that size. The specimen to which I alluded as
being 2 inches and 8 lines, I am now inclined to think must
have been a S. ¢etragonurus, which often reaches 3 inches.
In respect to the internal structure of these two species,
which I have examined and compared, I see no very import-
ant differences between them. The stomach is of a very
peculiar form in both, having its pyloric portion so extra-
ordinarily elongated, that it might easily be mistaken for a
portion of the intestine itself. This, indeed, as well as other
points in the anatomy of these animals, would deserve further
notice, but for the circumstance of M. Duvernoy’s memoir*,
* Mém. de la Soc. du Mus. d’Hist. Nat. de Strasbourg, tom. ii. mém, 2.
the smaller British Mammalia. 265
so often alluded to in my former papers, in which they have
been treated of in detail, and to which 1 must refer those who
are interested in the subject. I may, however, make one or
two remarks, as supplemental to his.
M. Duvernoy states the length of the intestinal canal in the
S. tetragonurus, compared with the length of the body, to be
as three to one, and rather more. In most of the specimens
which I have examined, I have found it nearly as four to
one, and in some instances even bearing a higher ratio than
this; whilst the ratio of three to one more nearly accords
with the case of the S. Hibernicus. The relative, however,
as well as the absolute length of the intestinal canal, varies a
little in both species, according to the size of the individual.
I shall here annex the actual measurement of this, and one
or two other parts, such as were observed, first, in a medium-
sized specimen of the S. tetragonurus, and then in an old
full-grown S. Hibernicus.
S. TETRAGONURUS. oe Fae eng d
Length of the head and body............seeseseceees gosratene
— of the tail ..... eine taaene te loalcbbi a eeesiy ae sec eate : 9
Greatest diameter of the distended stomach ............0+ if
Distance from the cardiac orifice to the pylorus, ae 0
the length of the pyloric gut ..........scsseseeeeees
Entire length of the intestinal canal, from the naa, 10 9
IMS 2 SNES Gh Ege sags ppecooo sane aosneenano sen spesoceco
S. HisErnicus.
Length of the head and body
inches. lines.
Of the tail @ an.ce cas aoorededondaccu Bape ceseiaecannaceee 1 5
Greatest diameter of the distended stomach.............+. 0 5
Distance from the cardiac orifice to the pylorus ......... 0 9
Entire length of intestinal canal, as before
The number of ribs, which is not mentioned by Duvernoy,
I find to be 14 in both species, of which 7 are true and 7
false.
The number of vertebree was also found to be the same in
the case of a single individual of each species, and may be
estimated as follows :—
Cervical mcasdccscasestcwscaeeeeeecacenseeesccces 7
Dorsalucctisiceccssaccacessccccsssenstecesuessces 14
IAT OY Ioaeaereceenccocebe eeeckelectaees sestees 5
Sactaliv pa cavesescnciscastssscsenecseeecemeensos 2
Galil al rseaesases qaacoh wane seoeadeasccsed.seeeice 15
266 Rey. L. Jenyns on some of
In a second specimen, however, of the S. fetragonurus the
number of caudal vertebrae was as many as 16, whilst in a
second of the S. Hibernicus it was only 14; thus showing
that in each species it is subject to some variation.
In the above table I have estimated the number of sacral
vertebrae as 2, according to Duvernoy, who, though he has
not given the entire number in the column, has noticed the
very peculiar and elongated form of these two, having a sharp
ridge on their upper surface, much developed, and common
to them both. It is evident, however, on a close inspection,
that the first of these two vertebra, which he speaks of as
being the most elongated, is resolvable into 4, which are
more or less consolidated together, according to the age of
the individual. In some instances the lines of separation
between them are so distinct, that they might be counted
separately ; in which case the entire number of vertebrae in
the S. tetragonurus would stand at 47 or 48, and in the S.
Hibernicus at 46 or 47.
I have deemed it of importance to mention these facts with
respect to the vertebra, from the circumstance of M. de
Selys-Longchamps having found it a valuable character in
distinguishing some closely allied species of Arvicola, and
observed to me that he thought it might prove of equal ser-
vice in helping to discriminate those of the genus Sorex. It
appears, however, from what has been stated, that the exact
number in the tail, in this instance, cannot be relied on.‘
(6.) Sorex castaneus (Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. i. p. 43).—
I have not been able to obtain any more specimens of this
species*, and can therefore say nothing further as to its being
really distinct from the S. ¢e¢tragonurus. M. de Selys-Long-
champs, who has paid so much attention to this genus, and
to whom it was shown during his visit to London in 1839,
declined giving any decided opinion about it; at the same
time, he observed that he had never seen any individuals of
the S. ¢etragonurus of so rufous a tint. I conceive, however,
that the fact of a male and female having been found together,
the latter of which was big with young when taken, rather
tends to support the idea of its being distinct. Also, in-
dependently of its colour, and one or two other external
peculiarities, there is a slight difference observable in the
cranium, as already pointed out in a former papery.
* The original specimens were not obtained in my own immediate neigh-
bourhood, nor by myself, but in a fen distant some miles from me, and by a
person who has since left the district; and I am ignorant of the exact locality
in which he met with them.
+ Ann. N. H., vol. i. p. 424.
the smaller British Mammalia. 267
I regret that, when I dissected one of the above specimens,
soon after its capture, I did not notice the number of ribs
and vertebra, which might have helped to determine the
question. This is a point to which attention should be paid
by any naturalist who may be fortunate enough to meet with
others. The viscera resembled those of the S. te¢ragonurus ;
the intestinal canal, however, being relatively a trifle longer
than in that species, and measuring 10 inches 4 lines, the
length of the body being 2 inches 4+ lines.
1 may just observe, before quitting this species, that the
shrew which Mr. Thompson obtained from Ballantrae, and
considered as referable to the S. castaneus*, has been kindly
submitted to my examination, and proves to be only a pale
variety of the S. ¢edragonurus ; and it 1s at his own request that
I mention this circumstance. In both my specimens of the
Chestnut Shrew, the rufous tint, in the recently killed animal,
was quite as bright and decided as in the harvest-mouse or
squirrel.
(7.) Sorex fodiens.—The peculiar form of stomach noticed
above in the case of the S. ¢e¢tragonurus and the S. Hibernicus,
is probably to be found in all those shrews having the same
type of dentition as those species, and belonging to Duvernoy’s
subgenus Amphisorext. In the S. fodiens, which has a di-
stinct dental formula, and constitutes the subgenus Hydro-
sorex of Duvernoy (Crossopus of Wagler), the stomach is of
a somewhat globular form, and without any elongation of the
pyloric portion whatever.
In a female specimen of this species, 2 inches 11 lines in
length, exclusive of the tail, the following internal measure-
ments were observed :—
inches. lines.
Diameter of the distended stomach .........sesesesseses 0 11
Distance from the cardiac orifice to pylorus ..........46 0 35
Length-of, the intestinal. canal ) ...4.2....0ssececedecooneee 15 )
In another female, exactly of the same ‘length, the intestinal
canal was found to be only 12 inches 9 lines, showing that
this part is subject to considerable variation in respect to
extent. Neither in this, nor in any other species of this
genus, is there any caecum, or much distinction between the
small and great intestines, the diameter of the canal being
nearly everywhere the same.
The number of ribs in the S. fodiens is 13, 1 less than in
the S. tetragonurus ; whereof 7 are true and 6 false.
* Charlesworth’s Mag. of Nat. Hist., vol. ili. p. 585.
} Supplement to his first memoir, 1833.
268 Rev. L. Jenyns on some of
There are 6 lumbar vertebra and 17 caudal, there being 1
more of these last than in any specimen of the S. tetragonurus
yet examined; and the entire number of vertebrz will stand
at 45 or 48, according as the sacral are reckoned at 2 or 5 as
before. This estimate was obtained from an examination of
three specimens.
(8.) Sorex cilatus—I have seen so many intermediate
specimens, in point of colour, between this and the last
species, that I consider it extremely doubtful whether they
be distinct. Nevertheless, it deserves to be mentioned, that
in one very dark-coloured individual of the S. fodiens, and
which was sent to me as the S. ciliatus, though it was
not quite so uniformly black as my original specimen ofthis
latter, or so bulky for its length, I found 18 caudal vertebre,
being 1 more than in any of the three individuals of the
S. fodiens above-mentioned. This must not be considered
as conclusive in favour of the S. céliatus being a species, as
we have already seen the number of caudal vertebrze varying
by 1, in the case of the S. tetragonurus ; yet it should serve
to stimulate to further inquiry. I regret that I have not
myself had an opportunity of examining into the value of
this character in more specimens.
I once thought that there were other anatomical pecu-
liarities by which this species might be distinguished from
the S. fodiens, to which M. de Selys-Longchamps has made
some allusion* ; but having since had reason to suspect that
they are not to be relied upon, I forbear dwelling on them.
(9.) Mus sylvaticus ?—I1 have two or three times had sub-
mitted to my examination specimens of a mouse found on the
tops of the Irish mountains, either belonging to this species
or very closely allied to it; but those which I have seen have
been in too bad condition (merely dried skins) to enable me
to decide this point. One of these was taken in the county
of Kerry, at an elevation of 2500 feet above the sea-level.
The only respects in which they appear to differ from the
M. sylvaticus are, in being of a darker colour, smaller, and
with some of the relative proportions rather less; but it must
be left for those who have an opportunity of examining a large
number in the recent state, to say whether there are any real
grounds for believing them to be distinct. On the whole, I
am inclined to think that they are only a small variety of that
species, somewhat modified in its characters from the peculiar
locality which they inhabit.
(10.) Arvicola amphibius—Not long since I obtained a
small Water Vole, which I consider exactly intermediate
* Micromammalogie, p. 29.
the smaller British Mammalia. 269
between the A. amphibius and the A. ater of MacGillivray.
The following is a correct description of the colours :
Extreme tip of the snout dusky; cheeks and upper part
of the head very deep brown, with a slight reddish tinge, the
tips of the hairs being of this colour ; back, from between the
ears to the root of the tail, wholly black, the short pile as
well as the long hairs being of one uniform tint throughout ;
sides very deep brown, slightly tinged with reddish; belly
deep ash-grey, with a tinge of reddish like the sides; chin
ash-grey, without the reddish tinge, which is deepest just
beyond the contour of the chin, and between the fore-legs ;
all the feet covered with very short black hairs above, smooth
and naked and paler underneath ; tail black, and of one colour
throughout.
The length of this individual was 5 inches 3 lines, exclusive
of the tail, which was 3 inches 3 lines. I have observed, like
Mr. MacGillivray*, that the black variety of this species is
generally much smaller than the brown. Yet I have known
a few instances to the contrary; and one individual, which
was the most uniformly deep-coloured one I ever saw, was
also the largest. I regret, however, that the note which I
made of its exact dimensions has been lost.
(11.) Arvicola arvalis.—This species, like the last, appears
subject to some variation of character, particularly as regards
colour; so much so, as at one time to have led myself, as well
as others, to suspect there might be two species confounded
under one name.
Two individuals which I have had by me in spirits several
years, have the feet and tail yellowish, as described by De
Selys-Longchampst, the latter being entirely of one colour ;
the fur above reddish brown, with the ears appearing out of
it; the hair on the under parts of the body rather short and
thin, and greyish white, the basal portion of each hair being
ash-colour. The larger of these individuals was a female
taken in the breeding season, measuring 4 inches 1 line in
length, exclusive of the tail, which was 1 inch 3} lines. The
upper parts in this specimen were quite as red as in the A.
rubidus of De Selys.
I have since, at different times, obtained many other in-
dividuals, in which the snout, feet and tail were deep ash-
grey, approaching to dusky instead of yellowish; the tail
also exhibiting an appearance of two colours, as in the A.
rubidus and A. subterraneus of the above author. Some of
these had the fur as described above; but in others it was
* Naturalist’s Library, vol. vii. (Brit. Quad.) p. 264.
{+ Micromammalogie, p. 106.
270 Rev. L. Jenyns on some of
rather longer, reducing the ears to nearly its own length ; and
the hair on the under parts was not only longer and thicker,
but darker at the roots, a considerable portion from the base
upwards being dusky.
Similar to these last described are several individuals in
the Museum of the Zoological Society, which, being shown
to M. de Selys-Longchamps during his visit to London in
1839, he was at first inclined to think different from the
A. arvalis of his work. However, in a subsequent commu-
nication by letter to this country, he writes word that he has,
since the publication of his ‘ Etudes de Micromammalogie,’
obtained information with respect to the Mus agrestis of
Linneus, found in Sweden; and he says that it appears to
be the same as his Arvalis, only the colour of the Swedish
individuals is rather darker, and the upper part of the tail
darker than the under. He then adds, that he had observed
a similar local variety in the collection of the Zoological
Society, and that he does not think that it is specifically
distinct from the common Arvalis.
That this opinion is correct I have but little doubt ; and I
conceive that the variation in the length and colour of the
fur is probably dependent upon season, though the difference
of colour in the feet and tail in some specimens can be traced
to no particular cause.
(12.) Arvicola neglecta, Thompson.—For some time I was
inclined to consider also as a mere variety of the A. arvalis
some specimens from Scotland, the first of which I received
from Mr. Thompson so long back as the spring of 1839. 'To
the kindness and liberality, however, of this gentleman I have
lately been indebted for permission to examine a much larger
number of the same kind of Arvicola collected last autumn at
my request, and after a close comparison of both sexes of dif-
ferent sizes with English individuals, I am inclined to think
that they deserve to rank as a distinct species. I should say
that Mr. Thompson had been previously led to form this opi-
non, and that it was also the opinion of M. Agassiz, to whom
he showed specimens, on the occasion of that naturalist’s visit
to Scotland last summer. I have accordingly adopted Mr.
Thompson’s own name neglecta for this species, of which he
is the discoverer, and which he has merely put into my hands
to describe.
Mr. Thompson informs me that this new Arvicola is com-
mon on moors in two localities in the district around Megar-
nie Castle in Perthshire, where he first observed it himself,
whilst shooting, in 1829. He has also received it from some
sporting friends at Aberarder in Inverness-shire. At this last
the smaller British Mammalia. 271
place it was taken in traps set for vermin on broken rocky
ground at the base of the glens: it was also caught by the
dogs, and knocked on the head by the shooters, in the heathy
tracts up to the summits of the mountains; and he adds,
which is worthy of remark, that, from want of speed, it was
much more easily killed than the common mouse or rat.
The most striking peculiarity in this new species is its large
size compared with that of the A. arvalis. Both males and
females occur measuring five inches in the body without the
tail; and it is said that they are sometimes met with five and
a half inches long, or even exceeding this. The following are
the relative proportions of a male specimen of medium size,
according to Mr. Thompson :—
Inv) line
EV CAGSARG DORN neaccsisie poe npleas ss sisensesins cls seca so 1.0 0
hailitovendyotbones, Secaccessporccace vec ee ceen aa el 3
Manletoxenduotahairg verse censaepsccercunetene ces 1 6
Head ge ccstseecteswosuatene assets Bay Seaeoeencuesaes 3 1 Ts
HANS Ase ies vO5s wae weans aclhiepicecsisanatun derieorses 0 5
AWUNISKETS! Miwiccinniiccse seams wes aciewcananeaioteenens eee 0)
Moret OG bras aocaek tecdsaceesaaueeeteostnseseniveats 0 54
Faatd=fOOt: scan ccccs cascecesscsh ese seneeammoewerecees One
A female of the same size preserved the same relative mea-
surements, excepting that the hind foot was shorter by half
aline. I observe, amongst the specimens he has sent myself,
that the males have generally the feet and tail somewhat
larger and stouter than the females. The same thing, how-
ever, occurs to a less degree in the A. arvalis.
As regards external form, including the characters of the
snout, eyes, ears, feet, toes, and tubercles on the soles, it is
similar to the common species. In each also there is the
same number of mamme, four pectoral and four inguinal*,
The general colour of the upper parts is also the same ; but
the fur is everywhere considerably longer, so as to cause the
ears to be entirely concealed ; and its greater length, as well
as the greater quantity of it, is especially obvious on the under
parts, where it is also darker at the roots, and of a rather
purer white at the tips of the hairs. Some specimens are
more rufous above than others ; but the brightness of the tint
appears to have no constant connexion with the sex or size of
the individual. The colour of the feet and tail, in all cases, is
dusky ; the latter somewhat darker above than below, as in the
* This is of importance to be noted, since in the 4. subterraneus of De
Selys, a closely allied species found in Belgium and France, and possibly to
be met with in this country, the number of mamme is only sia, all of which
are inguinal.
272 _ Rev. L. Jenyns on some of
dark-coloured variety of the A. arvalis noticed under the head
of that species.
With a view to inquire still further into the characters of
the A. neglecta, by permission of Mr. Thompson I dissected
several specimens, and compared their internal structure with
that of the A. arvalis; but, excepting in the cranium to be
hereafter noticed, no very obvious differences presented them-
selves. There are a few points, however, in relation to this
subject, which may be worth stating.
The length of the intestinal canal, as well as the relative
length of its different portions, both in the A. neglecta and
the A. arvalis, varies much in different individuals, and even
in individuals of the same size and sex. Mr. Yarrell* and
Mr. MacGillivray+ have both given measurements of these
parts in the A. arvalis, which are very different from each
other, but which, as the latter gentleman has not mentioned
the size of the individual from which they were taken, do not
admit of direct comparison. I shall annex the results which
I obtained in three different instances of the A. neglecta, and
one of the A. arvalis.
No; 1: No. 2. No. 3. No. 4.
in. lin. ites in. lin. in.) Lins
Small intestines ... 13 3 145, 9 9-9 LOe) £3
Cecuim sereasseteee ase 6... -0 7 9 4 0 3 9
Large intestines ... 12 6 15040 Die ene
No. 1. was a male neglecta, measuring four inches in length,
exclusively of the tail. No 2. was a female of the same spe-
cies, and exactly of the same size. No. 3. was a young male
of the same species, measuring three inches. No. 4. was a
male arvalis, exactly of the same size as No. 3. It will be ob-
served, that Nos. 3. and 4, which are different species, do not
differ more in this respect than Nos. 1. and 2, which are sexes
of the same.
Another part which J found varying in different individuals
was the gall-bladder. It is observed in anatomical works that
this organ is found wanting in many of the Rodentia, parti-
cularly among the Rats {. Mr. Yarrell observes, that both the
field and bank Campagnol are equally devoid of it. If it be
really the fact, that it is never present in the former of these
two species, this circumstance will tend to the confirmation
of the A. neglecta being distinct, in which I have observed it
in the only three cases I have examined, though of such dif-
ferent degree of development as to lead to the suspicion that
* Lond. Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. v. p. 600. + Brit. Quad., p. 267.
t Blum. Man. Comp. Anat., by Lawr. (2nd edit.), p. 128.
the smaller British Mammalia. 273
it may sometimes be wanting here also. In one individual it
was of considerable size, attaining to the margin of the liver;
in a second it was less ; in a third it was very small, but still
obvious. I have not observed it, any more than Mr. Yarrell,
in the true A. arvalis.
The A. neglecta and the A. arvalis agree in the number of
vertebrae. M. de Selys-Longchamps has given the entire
number in the latter as forty-six, which accords with the num-
ber given by Mr. Yarrell, as well as with that observed by
myself in several individuals of each of the above species, un-
less a very minute rudimentary one at the extremity of the
tail be included, in which case the entire number must be set
at forty-seven. In one instance, however, of the A. neglecta,
a female, I found an additional caudal vertebra, making the
entire number forty-seven without the rudimentary one. This
affords another proof of the caution that is required in draw-
ing any conclusion as to the number of vertebrz from the ex-
amination of single specimens.
The number of ribs was in all cases the same for both spe-
cies, seven true and six false ; being also the number given to
the A. arvalis by De Selys.
The only part of importance remaining to be mentioned is
the cranium. I have examined that of three individuals of the
A. neglecta, and, though in general form the same, I find it
decidedly larger, broader across the zygomatic arches, and
with the bones of the zygoma itself stronger, than that of the
arvalis, comparing two individuals of the same size in other
respects. In the adult animal, the strength and bend of the
zygomatic bones become very considerable, indicating great
muscular powers in biting and masticating its food. The fol-
lowing are the relative measurements of the crania of a large
and small A. neglecta, and also of that of the A. arvalis for
comparison. —
No. 1. No.2. No. 3.
in. lin, lin. lin.
Entire length .........-:s0sseseee 1K 11 103
Breadth across zyg. arches ....... 0 7 barely. 6 exceeding, 53
Breadth behind the zyg. arches 0 5} 4s 48
No. 1. is that of an individual of the A. neglecta, measuring
four inches in length, tail excluded. No. 2. is that of another
individual of the same species, measuring three inches. No.3.
is that of an individual of the A. arvalis, exactly of the same
size as the last.
Having entered above, in some detail, into the characters
of the A. neglecta, and the grounds on which I venture to
confirm Mr. Thompson’s opinion, as to its being distinct from
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. i
274 Rey. L. Jenyns on some of
the A. arvalis, it may be useful just to place side by side the
essential differences between these two species, which after
all are not very great, and on the true value of which I do not
pretend to speak positively.
A. arvalis.—Body 4 inches: ears projecting out of the fur :
colour of the fur above reddish brown ; beneath greyish
white, the hair sometimes dusky at the roots.
A. neglecta.—Body 5 or 53 inches: fur long, entirely con-
cealing the ears: colour of the fur above reddish brown,
beneath whitish, with a large portion of the hair from the
root upwards dusky.
To these differences may be added the absence of a gall-
bladder in the A. arvalis, and its presence in the A. neglecta,
if further observation prove the constancy of this character ;
also the differences in the cranium above pointed out.
(13.) Arvicola rubidus, De Selys? (A. riparia, Yarr.)—I
cannot but feel some doubts as to the identity of the A. ri-
paria of Mr. Yarrell and the A. rubidus of De Selys, notwith-
standing the opinion of this last author, from the striking dif-
ference observable in the cranium of our English specimens,
as compared with the figure and description of this part in
the A. rubidus, given in the §‘ Micromammalogie.’? M. de
Selys says of this last, “‘crdne plus allongé que chez les autres ;”
and again, “orbites moyens, allongés, étroits en arriere, les ar-
cades zygomatiques étant peu arquées.” His figure is accord-
ing to this description, and represents the length of the cra-
nium as rather more than twice its breadth acrossthe zygomatic
arches. But neither will agree with a cranium in my posses-
sion, which is not more elongated than that of the A. neglecta,
spoken of above, and in which the orbits are as broad, and
the zygomatic arches as much bent, as in that species, the
breadth across being considerably more than half the entire
length. This cranium belongs to an Arvicola, which was ob-
tained by Mr. Thompson from Aberarder, where it was taken
in company with the A. neglecta, and along with which it was
kindly forwarded to me in 1839. Neither he nor myself had
any doubts of its being the A. riparia of Yarrell, though in
size it rather exceeded any specimens I had seen previously.
The following were its measurements :—
in. lin.
Headvandibody) qae.c.. crete mccereencee 3 op ee)
PUG ad) Fectecccwsedseneccliceonescslaoecnecs 1 of
MAL cect caciteaisas Geis oes neces escecmeiine Zea)
Harspresastsccscchescccmccnecssenenticacone Oo 44
LING -LOOE Wiaieesisceieceomae coeaccestencacees O ALS
Hone-foot: saccorcesvccecues eee tewatseees 0 44
the smaller British Mammalia. 275
It will be seen that the tail was more than half the length
of the body : it was also of two colours, as in the A. riparia,
dusky above, whitish beneath. The ears were apparent out
of the fur; and the general colours were those of the species
just mentioned.
T will now annex the exact relative measurements of the
cranium :—
Entire length —.........2e0+8. eeeeenceeeasaes it
Breadth across zygomatic arches ......... 63
behind the zygomatic arches ... 53
Length of the nasal bones ............--. 3 rather exceeding.
Breadth of the nasal bones ...........005- 14
of space between orbits .......... 13
Menor mOb the OCDibt csesecsesseessct ane a+ 4 nearly.
Breauun Gr the OLB o. sevscacscacsveecresass 2}
Though much bent, the bones of the zygomatic arches are
very slight compared with those of the d. neglecta, or even the
A. arvalis. The incisors also are shorter and slenderer. All the
molars above and below are deeply stained with a purplish
ebony colour, pervading nearly the whole exposed portions of
the teeth, except their grinding surfaces. There is only a faint
stain of this colour on the molars of the A. neglecta and the
A, arvalis.
Though this cranium appears so dissimilar to that of the
A. rubidus of De Selys, as represented in his work, it closely
resembles his figure of that of the 4A. duodecimcostatus ; a spe-
cies, however, to which it cannot be referred, inasmuch as the
specimen described above had the same number of ribs as the
A. arvalis.
The number of vertebree I am not able to state, as previous
to my having an opportunity of examining its internal struc-
ture, the specimen had been deprived of a portion of its tail*.
I may, however, add the measurements of the intestinal
canal :
iy elie
Sinalleintestiness sccssceats seccneeecceses 14 9
(OPAC i oARe HoeCES EE CAPOOC OCR CE AAR ACH OCE 450419
Wrarge imtestiness..--csss-c0scotesscecose Sr 16
These measurements will be found very different from those
given by Mr. Yarrell; but as we have already seen how hable
to variation these parts are in relative length, and as Mr. Yar-
* I may just state in explanation, that after examining its external cha-
racters in 1839, the specimen was returned to Mr. Thompson, who had it
skinned, I imagine, for mounting. The body was afterwards forwarded to
me in spirits for dissection, in a mutilated state.
T2
276 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes.
rell’s specimen was much smaller than mine, too much stress
must not be laid on this circumstance. It deserves to be no-
ticed, however, that this specimen had a gall-bladder like the
A, neglecta, small yet quite distinct, which Mr. Yarrell’s had
not. Hence this organ is certainly sometimes present, and at
other times absent, in the same species, unless we imagine,
which I conceive very improbable, that the one here described
was different from his.
The stomach was of the same form as in the 4. arvalis and
A. neglecta. The liver consisted of seven distinct lobes, five
large and two smaller ones.
I have already stated that this specimen was taken at Abe-
rarder, in Inverness-shire; and Mr. Thompson informs me,
that, supposing it to be the A. riparia of Mr. Yarrell, he be-
lieves it to be the most northern British habitat for this spe-
cies.
Swaffham Bulbeck, April 26, 1841.
XXXIII. —Suppiement to a Catalogue of Trish Zoophytes. By
Arruur Hriut Hassan, Esq. Read before the Natural
History Society of Dublin, November 6th, 1840.
[ With Five Engravings. ]
Mr. Chairman and Gentleman,
As to many of my hearers the subject of the present commu-
nication, entitled a ‘ Supplement to a Catalogue of Irish Zoo-
phytes,’ published in the November Number of the ¢ Annals
and Magazine of Natural History,’ may be altogether new, I
propose, before entering upon the consideration of it, to make
some observations on Zoophytes generally. This course will,
I hope, serve both to interest my audience, as well as to re-
lieve, in some measure, the tediousness of a mere enumeration
or technical description of species, which, however valuable to
science itself, possesses but little to attract or engage the at-
tention. The most careless wanderer on the sea-shore must
often have noticed the beauty and delicacy of the conforma-
tion of these interesting productions, rivalling in their purity
and freshness the element which they inhabit and adorn, and
have been struck with wonder and admiration at the evidence
of designing care which they so remarkably exhibit even in
their general appearance. Nor is the beauty and elegance so
observable in their outward form diminished by a closer in-
spection. If the power of a microscope be applied to them,
and their more intimate structure be disclosed, new beauties
Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 277
and wonders are made manifest to the admiring gaze. In this
particular all natural productions differ from those of man and
art, in whose works a minute examination renders apparent
clefects, rudeness and deformity.
But little more than a century has elapsed since the true
nature of the productions about to occupy our attention was
first discovered: prior to that period various opinions were
entertained respecting them. By one class of persons, and
these were by far the most numerous, they were regarded as
the undoubted subjects of the vegetable kingdom, and were
so arranged and classified in the various systems of the most
learned botanists of that day. Nor is this to be wondered at,
when we consider the striking resemblances which these ob-
jects bear to vegetables, both in form and habits; some of
them being eminently arborescent in their mode of growth,
and being fixed by roots, either imbedded in the sand, or at-
tached to rocks, stones and other substances, in the same
manner as sea-weed, and consequently being incapable of lo-
comotion, a character at that time considered essential to con-
stitute an animal, being possessed in common by all the ani-
mals then known.
By asecond set of persons, at the head of whom stands the
name of the illustrious Linnzeus, all the horny and flexible
Zoophyta were considered to hold a station intermediate be-
tween the animal and vegetable kingdoms, partaking of the
nature of both. The Lithophyta were, however, arranged by
him in the animal kingdom, on the supposition that lime was
always an animal product. “ The animalcules of the Litho-
phyta, like the testaceous tribes,” he said, “fabricated their
own caleareous polypidom, forming the whole mass into tubes,
each ending on the surface in pores or cells, where alone the
animal seems to dwell; but the polypes of the proper Zoo-
phyta, so far from constructing their plant like polypidoms,
were, on the contrary, the productions or efflorescences of it ;
just as the flowers do not make the herb or tree, but are the
results of the vegetative life proceeding to perfection. Polypes,
according to this fancy, bore the same relation to their poly-
pidom that flowers do to the trunks and branches of a tree ;
both grew by vegetation: but while the one evolved from the
extremities blossoms, which shrunk not under external irita-
tion, and were therefore properly flowers, the other put forth
flowers, which, because they exhibited every sign of animality,
were therefore, with reason, considered animals.” In a letter
to Ellis he remarks, alluding to the Zoophytes, “they are,
therefore, vegetables, with flowers like small animals.” In his
‘ Diary’ he further observes, that they are “ vegetables with re-
278 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes.
spect to their stems, and animals with respect to their flo-
rescence.”
By a third party Zoophytes were deemed to be of a mineral
origin. This theory was particularly advocated by Henry
Baker: “The rocks in the sea on which these corals are pro-
duced,” he says, “are undoubtedly replete with mineral salts,
some whereof, near their surface, being dissolved by the sea-
water, must consequently saturate with their saline particles
the water round them to a small distance, where, blending with
the stony matter with which the sea-water always abounds,
little masses will be constituted here and there and affixed to
the rocks. Such adhering masses may be termed roots, which
roots, attracting the saline and stony particles, according to
certain laws in nature, may produce branched or other figures,
and increase gradually by an apposition of particles becoming
thicker near the bottom, where the saline matter is more
abounding, but tapering or diminishing towards the extremi-
ties, where the mineral salts must be fewer in proportion to
their distance from the rock whence they originally proceed ;
and the different proportions of mineral saline particles of the
stony or other matter wherewith they are blended, and of
marine salt, which must have a considerable share in such
formations, may occasion all the variety we see. Nor does it
seem more difficult to imagine that the radiated, starry, or cel-
lular figures along the sides of these corals, or at the extre-
mities of their branches, may derive their production from
salts incorporated with the stony matter, than that the curious
delineations and appearances of minute shrubs and mosses on
slates, stones, etc., are owing to the shootings of salts inter-
mixed with mineral particles ; and yet ‘hese are generally al-
lowed to be the work of mineral steams or exhalations.” It
is scarcely necessary to observe, that the whole of the theories
of which I have given but a very short outline, highly inge-
nious and interesting as they are, are yet untenable: the
beautiful and poetic hypothesis of Linnzeus is, however, the
nearest approximation to the truth. We learn from Dr. John-
ston’s excellent ‘ Introduction to his British Zoophytes’, from
which I have had occasion to quote largely, when speaking of
the opinions of Linnzus, and to which I must again refer
when mentioning those of Ellis, that Ferrante Imperato, an
apothecary in Naples, was the first naturalist, according to
M. de Blainville, distinctly to publish as the result of his pro-
per observations the animality of corals and madrepores ; and
he is said to have accompanied the description of the species
which fell under his notice with illustrative figures of consi-
derable accuracy. His ‘ Historia Naturale’ was printed at
Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 279
Naples in 1599; but although again reprinted in 1672, the
book and the knowledge it contained had sunk into such ob-
livion, that when Peysonnel, in the year 1727, communicated
the same discovery to the Academy of Sciences in Paris, it
was received by the members of that learned body in a man-
ner which is sufficient to convince us that it was entirely new
to them, and exposed the author to the obloquy and censure
which are the usual portions of an original discoverer.
To John Ellis, however, a merchant in London, is to be
accorded the honour of having placed the fact of the animality
of Zoophytes beyond all doubt or controversy. The inquiries
entered into by this individual were prosecuted with an ardour
and a diligence worthy of the subject, and affording a bright
and refreshing example for others to imitate ; and it is pleasing
to notice, that the zeal he displayed and the labour he bestowed
were amply recompensed by the importance of the results to
which his investigations led. “There was nothing unformed
or mystical in Ellis’s opinion. Certain marine productions,
which, under the names of Lithophyta and Ceratophyta, had
been arranged among vegetables, and were still very generally
believed to be so, he maintained and proved, with a most satis-
factory fulness of evidence, to be entirely of an animal nature,
the tenements and products of animals similar in many re-
spects to the naked freshwater polype. By examining them
in a living state, through an ordinary microscope, he saw these
polypes in the denticles or cells of the zoophyte; he wit-
nessed them display their tentacula for the capture of their
prey; their varied actions and sensibility to external impres-
sions and their mode of propagation; he saw further that
these little creatures were organically connected with the cells,
and could not remove from them, and that although each cell
was appropriated to a single individual, yet was this united by
a tender thready line to the fleshy part that occupies the mid-
dle of the whole coralline, and in this manner connected with
all the individuals of that coralline. The conclusion was irre-
sistible: the presumed plant was the skin or covering of a sort
of miniature hydra,—a conclusion which Ellis strengthened by
an examination of their covering separately, which he said was
as much an animal structure as the nails or horns of beasts, or
the shell of the tortoise : for it differs from sea-plants in texture
as well as hardness, and likewise in their chemical produc-
tion; for sea-plants, properly so called, such as the Alge,
Fuci, etc., afford in distillation little or no traces of a volatile
salt; whereas the corallines afford a considerable quantity,
and in burning yield a smell somewhat resembling that of
burnt horn and other animal substances, which of itself is a
280 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes.
proof that this class of bodies, though it has the vegetable
form, yet is not entirely of a vegetable nature.”
Among the many recent cultivators of this interesting de-
partment of natural history, the name of Dr. Johnston of Ber-
wick stands pre-eminent, whose excellent work on the Bri-
tish Zoophytes has done much to exalt the subject, and to
diffuse a more general taste for its cultivation. I trust that
ere long we shall be favoured with a second volume on the
Zoophytes of Great Britain by that gentleman.
The term Zoophyte is applied to all those productions
which, bearing a strong resemblance to vegetables in form and
some other particulars, are yet of an animal nature. The more
arborescent of them are often called corallines, a name which
is peculiarly appropriate, being a derivative of the word coral,
to which they are intimately allied, and by means of which
such gigantic changes are daily being effected. Islands, and
I might almost say, without incurring the charge of exagge-
ration, continents are being raised from the deep abysses of the
ocean, to be, perchance, at some future period clothed with
vegetation, and peopled like unto our own fair land—to be
the arena on which many eventful scenes in the world’s his-
tory are to be performed; and these mighty results are to be
brought about by the agency of insects scarcely perceptible
to our unaided sight, but whose operations, though slow, silent
and invisible, are yet certain and unceasing :—
“ Unconscious, not unworthy, instruments,
By which a hand invisible was rearing
A new creation in the secret deep.
Omnipotence wrought in them, with them, by them ;
Hence, what Omnipotence alone could do
Worms did. I saw the living pile ascend,
‘The mausoleum of its architects,
Sull dying upwards as their labours closed :
Slime the material, but the slime was turn’d
‘fo adamant by their petrific touch;
Frail were their frames, ephemeral their lives—
Their masonry imperishable.”
In nothing is God’s infinity and man’s littleness more stri-
kingly exhibited and contrasted than in the operations of na-
ture upon a grand scale, and this is particularly evident in the
instance of the formation of coral islands to which I have re-
ferred. The extreme simplicity of the means employed for
the attaimment of such vast ends cannot but be a subject of
astonishment and admiration to every reflecting mind, and
this simplicity is apparent in all the ways and workings of
nature. How different is it with man’s designs ; how compli-
Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 281
cated are the means which he employs for the attainment of
his projects ; and often how inefficient are they for the fulfil-
ment of the end proposed, and how easily are they overturned
and annihilated by the intervention of some natural cause—
his greatest labours and most cherished hopes frequently
being dashed to the ground or buried in the deep by some
earthquake or storm !
“« Zoophytes,” to adopt the language of Dr. Johnston, “ pre-
sent to the physiologist the simplest independent structures
compatible with the existence of animal life, enabling him to
examine some of its phenomena in isolation, and free from
the obscurity which greater complexity of anatomy entails.
The means of their propagation and increase are the first of a
series of facts on which a theory of generation must arise ;
the existence of vibratile cilia on the surface of the membrane,
which has since been shown to be so general and influential
among animals, was first discovered in their study, and in them
is first detected the traces of a circulation carried on inde-
pendently of a heart and vessels. The close adhesion of life
to a low organization; its marvellous capacity of redintegra-
tion; the organic junction of hundreds and thousands of in-
dividuals in one body, the possibility of which fiction had
scarcely ventured to paint in its vagaries, have all in this class
their most remarkable illustration.”
I have ascertained that all the more transparent Zoophytes
possess highly lumimous properties. This fact I first disco-
vered in a specimen of Laomedia gelatinosa, and subsequently
in a great variety of other species. If a portion of it, adhering
to the sea-weed to which it is attached, be taken from the
water and agitated, a great number of bright phosphorescent
sparks will be emitted ; these sparks proceed from each of the
denticles of the coralline containing polypi, and the phzeno-
menon is equally apparent, whether the specimen be in or out
of water. The imagination could scarcely conceive a more
beautiful spectacle than would be furnished by the shining of
countless myriads of these tiny lamps, lighting up the dark
recesses and caves of the ocean. I lately had an opportunity
of beholding this novel and interesting sight of the phospho-
rescence of Zoophytes to great advantage, when on board one
of the Devonshire trawling-boats which frequent this coast.
The trawl was raised at midnight, and great quantities of coral-
lines were entangled in the meshes of the network, all shining
like myriads of the brightest diamonds. I would advise any
person wishing to witness this beautiful spectacle on a large
scale, to sally torth some dark night to the sea-shore, and dis-
turb, either with a stick or the foot, the sea-wrack left by the
282 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes.
receding tide, among which numerous corallines will be im-
bedded, particularly if a high wind have prevailed during the
day. Although I have not as yet had an opportunity of car-
rying into effect what I here recommend, I am convinced that
any individual who would be at the trouble and possessed
sufficient resolution to leave a warm fire at this uninviting
season, and encounter the rough. but refreshing sea-breeze,
would meet with an ample reward for the labour bestowed and
self-denial exercised. The fact of the phosphorescence of one
species of Sertularia, S. pumila, was, I have lately learned,
discovered by Stewart some time since; but the announce-
ment of it did not, it appears, lead to further inquiries into
this interesting subject.
An important distinctive character between Ascidian Zoo-
phytes and those of other classes, may be derived from the
arrangement of the tentacula. In the Ascidian type of Zoo-
phytes the tentacula are arranged in a determinate order, be-
ing disposed either in a crescent, as in some freshwater species,
or in the form of a bell, as in the marine orders of this class ;
whereas in the Hydroid, Helianthoid and Asteroid classes
they do not describe any regular figure, but are irregularly
disposed around the mouths of the polypi. An Ascidian
zoophyte, therefore, may at once be distinguished from all
others by observing the arrangement of the tentacula, and
without reference to internal organization. It is difficult to
conceive anything more strikingly beautiful, on a small scale,
than one of these Ascidian Zoophytes viewed under the field
of a microscope: the regular and elegant cup-like form de-
scribed by the tentacula; the ceaseless and rapid action of
the cilia; the uniform direction of the current which flows
over these, carrying with it numberless revolving particles,
some whereof are destined for the little creatures’ sustenance ;
and all these, if seen through a strong light, clothed in the
brightest prismatic colours, cannot fail to elicit the admiration
of the beholder. Should the slightest motion occur to disturb
it, the polype instantly withdraws itself within the shelter of
its little habitation, at once its home and its grave, and is con-.
cealed from sight ; its beauties are however again displayed as
soon as the agitation of the surrounding water ceases. It is
difficult, I say, to conceive a more beautiful or interesting spec-
tacle than is furnished by a single polype when thus viewed ;
but what must be the appearance formed by the countless
thousands of these animals which daily thus display them-
selves, peopling cave, rock and pool! and yet nearly six thou-
sand years have elapsed since their first creation before the
eye of man rested on them.
Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 283
Not amongst the least pleasurable of the emotions which
we experience in the study and contemplation of these beau-
tiful productions, is that feeling of heaJth and vigour which
attends us in our excursions in search of them. At one time
wandering upon the smooth and golden strand, exploring
among the tangled sea-wrack left by the receding tide for
these minute treasures of creation ; now diving into some deep
and dark caverns, in which the waves roar and dash against
the rocks with terrific violence, but still producing an effect
upon the mind pleasing and enchaining ; at another stretching
oneself at full length beside some clear and liquid pool, in
which the most beautiful and diversified landscapes may be
described—rocks, trees, shrubs and flowers in miniature, all
are palpable to the least imaginative mind, the colours of the
sea-weed rivalling the brightest and most varied tints of an
autumnal forest.
How superior, in the purity and satisfaction resulting from
their pursuit, are the pleasures which we derive from the con-
templation of the works of God, as manifested in the crea-
tion, to those sought after, by so many, and with such eager-
ness, in crowded and bustling cities !
“I care not, Fortune, what you me deny ;
You cannot rob me of free nature’s grace ;
You cannot shut the windows of the sky
Through which Aurora shows her bright’ning face ;
You cannot bar my constant feet to trace
The lonely shore at dewy morn and eve.
Let health my nerves and finer fibres brace,
And I their toys to the great children ieave :
Of nature, feeling, virtue, nought can me bereave.”’
Among the uses of these minims of creation, one of the high-
est appears to me to be, that of exciting in the mind of mana
spirit of inquiry, calculated to detach his thoughts from the
sordid selfishness of worldly occupation, and to raise them
with feelings of admiration and love to that Omnipotent
Being, who at the first formation of things pronounced all
his works “ very good.”
Entreating the attention of the Society for a short time
longer, I shall at once proceed to the consideration of the
matter of the ‘ Supplement?’ itself.
The species are enumerated in the order in which they oc-
cur in Dr. Johnston’s ‘ Zoophytes.’
Coryne squamata. Found growing upon Fucus siliquosus, opposite
Sea-point, south side of Dublin Bay, above low-water mark.
Hermia glandulosa. This species sometimes attains a height of
three inches. The glandular heads of the tentacula appear to be,
284 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes.
furnished with minute cups, similar to those of the Cuttle-fish, by
means of which the polypi are enabled to hold their prey ; and not,
as stated by Mr. Lister, covered with ‘‘ short projections, like blunt
hairs.” The reproductive gemmules are supported on a short foot-
stalk, and are fewer in number and several times larger than those
of the preceding species.
Dublin Bay, on various Fuci; not common.
Tubularia larynx. Both varieties of this species are trawled up
in great abundance off Howth and Lambay. ‘They are also found
attached to the under surface of stones, on the east side of Kings-
town Harbour.
Thoa muricata.—Giant’s Causeway.
Sertularia Margareta. Polypidom branched, branches alternate ;
rachis straight; cells nearly opposite, ovato-tubular, contracted on
the outer side; vesicles 4-sided, armed with 8 long teeth.
This species, in the absence of its remarkable vesicles, requires a
very careful examination to distinguish it from S. abietina. ‘There
are, however, well-marked differences between them. ‘the stem in
this species is straight, whereas in S. abietina it is flexuose ; the cells
are more nearly opposite, and are contracted on the outer side ; aper-
tures plain. The branches are alternate; there are three cells on
the rachis in the interval between each branch. Vesicles 4-sided,
very large, increasing in size at the distal end, and armed near the
summit with 8 stout spines, two placed at each angle.
To this new and interesting species I have assigned the Christian
name of a lady, distinguished not only for an ardent love of the
works of nature, but as a zealous collector in various branches of
natural history on these shores. See Plate VI. fig. 3, 4.
A Sertularia is figured and described in Ellis’s and Solander’s
‘ Zoophytes’’ under the name of S. pinaster, which bears a consi-
derable resemblance to the above. I do not, however, believe them
to be of the same species, as the vesicles in this are furnished with
but four spines.
Dredged up off Howth sparingly; also found near the Giant’s
Causeway.
S. pumila. The number of tentacula in this species is not very
constant, but usually about 16: they are not disposed in any de-
terminate order, as they always are in the Ascidian type of Zoophytes,
but are variously arranged.
Sertularia filicula. ‘This species was incorrectly enumerated as
among those found in Dublin Bay in my Catalogue. It is not met
with upon that coast; I have, however, obtained a few specimens in
the neighbourhood of the Giant’s Causeway.
Thuiaria articulata. ‘The stem in the specimens found in Dublin
Bay is not naked on the lower half, as it is generally described, but
is clothed with pinne to near its base, giving the polypidom a very
beautiful appearance. See Plate VII. fig. 1, 2. ‘The specimen figured
in this plate is the finest I ever saw, and I could not resist the temp-
tation of giving a drawing of it.
Not unfrequently obtained by trawling off Howth.
Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 285
Plumularia pinnata. Is generally found growing on a long fila-
mentous sea-weed, up the stem of which it creeps often for more
than a foot in extent, and round which the root-fibres form a com-
plete sheath. The specimens thrown up by the sea are usually de-
nuded of the short branches which proceed from the pinne. ‘The
vesicles are produced in great abundance, pyriform, blunt and plain
above: each vesicle contains 3 or 4 dark-coloured ova. Dr. John-
ston, in a letter I lately received from him, remarks, “I long ago
discovered the error of giving toothed vesicles to Pl. pinnata: they
are only toothed from laceration, after the ova have escaped. It is
curious that the ova should be produced in such numbers from the
root-fibres; but such is a common occurrence with this pretty species.”
Tolerably abundant in various parts of Dublin Bay.
Pl. setacea. The upper part of the vesicles of this species is pro-
longed into a short tube, affording an additional distinctive charac-
ter between it and PJ. pinnata, which it so closely resembles.
Trawled up off Howth, very rare.
Pi. Catharina. Frequently trawled up off Howth and Lambay,
in deep water, and but rarely cast upon the shore.
Pl. cristata. I have examined a specimen of this species, ob-
tained by my friend G. J. Allman, Esq., near Cork, having plumes
nearly three inches in length, and in which the ovarian vesicles are
produced only from the main stalks or midribs, giving to the whole
polypidom a very beautiful and unique appearance.
Pl. myriophyllum. Not common: obtained only by trawling off
Howth and Lambay,
Pl. frutescens. 1 have met with but one specimen of this species,
consisting of a single plume elegantly tapering to a point above.
See Plate VIII. fig. 1.
Alcyonidium rubrum, Miller. Dr. Johnston considers this to be
but a mere variety of Alcyonidium digitatum, or that species in its
‘* primary crustaceous condition.” ‘That it is not Aleyonidium digi-
tatum in its primary crustaceous condition, I am convinced, from
the circumstance of having frequently met with it of a very large
size, as large as the ordinary species ever occurred to me, nor do I
consider it to be a variety; for although no difference exists in the
number of the tentacula or in the form of the spiculz, it yet, in my
opinion, must be regarded as a distinct species, as I have always
met with it of the same uniform deep red colour; neither have I
been able to detect any gradations of colour between it and the
common kind, as might be expected were it but a variety. I have
occasionally, too, obtained both growing upon the same shell, each
possessing its own peculiar colour; and this is a strong fact in fa-
vour of their distinctness, as the great difference in colour could
not be accounted for by a reference to any external causes, both
specimens being subjected to the same influences.
Actinia mesembryanthemum. Everywhere common off the coast
of Dublin.
A. Bellis. “ Body elongated ; the lower part narrow, smooth, the
286 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes.
upper enlarged and glandularly warty : oral disc expanded, lobed :
tentacula in several rows, variegated.” -—Geriner.
This beautiful species is certainly no variety of Actinia gemmacea,
as has been supposed by some from the perusal of Gvertner’s de-
scription of it. It inhabits the fissures of rocks, in which the whole
of the body of the polypus is concealed, the expanded cup-like head
alone being visible above the margin of the fissure. The body is
often lengthened to the extent of two inches ; its basis is contracted,
but gradually widens upwards towards the calyx ; the lower portion
of it is nearly colourless, higher up it becomes of a flesh colour,
this changing into a greenish brown, of which it continues up as
far as the feelers. The upper half of the body is covered with nu-
merous small white glands, which possess great powers of suction.
The diameter of the calyx, which is somewhat cupped, in the larger
specimens often exceeds two inches; its margin does not describe a
perfect circle, but is variously festooned. The colour of the disc is
dark brown, ornamented with broad bands of opaque white, and
finely streaked and dotted with light yellow. The feelers are very
small, placed on the edge of the calyx in several rows, to the depth
of 4rd of an inch; those nearest the disc, also, are about 3rd of an
inch in length, and are the longest, the outermost tentacula being
but little more than papille ; they are of a lighter brown than the
disc, and are variegated with transverse bands and spots of white.
The shades of brown in the different parts of each Actinia vary con-
siderably with the specimens.
Found in a clear pool, opposite Dalkey Island, but little below
high-water mark, the only locality in which I have ever met with it ;
and what is not a little peculiar is, that it is confined to that one
pool, although there are others in its immediate vicinity apparently
equally suitable for it.
A. gemmacea. Everywhere common on the coast of Dublin.
A. dianthus. Frequently trawled up off Howth and Lambay.
A. maculata. The tentacula of this species are not contractile :
in this particular it resembles the genus Anthea of Johnston.
A single specimen, trawled up off Howth.
Anthea cereus. Although this species has not the power of short-
ening its feelers in the same way as the Actinias, yet, if specimens
be kept for some time in sea-water, their length becomes dimi-
nished, not by contraction, but by a process of invagination.
The three varieties of this species, described by Gertner, are
found in Sandy-cove, near Dublin; the green one but sparingly.
They usually adhere to Fuci, generally to Fucus serratus, and but
rarely to stones. Below low-water mark.
Valkeria cuscuta. Branches opposite ; cells in clusters, oval.
The above is the correct definition of this species, which it was
long ere I could identify by Ellis’s description of it. He described
the cells as being ‘in pairs, usually opposite,” whereas they are
really in clusters. Ellis’s description is only applicable to the species
in an imperfect and injured state. Valkeria cuscuta is readily di-
Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 287
stinguishable from V. imbricata, with which it was at first con-
founded by me, first, by the more delicate texture of the whole
polypidom ; secondly, by the smaller size and oval shape of the
cells. In Valkeria imbricata the cells are cylindrical ; the clusters
of cells in it, too, are more nearly approximated, and the number of
cells in each cluster is more numerous than in V. cuscuta.
Abundant, Sandy-cove, near Dublin.
[To be continued. }
XXXIV.—List of Phanerogamous Plants, together with the
Cryptogamic Orders Filices, Equisetaceze, and Lycopodi-
acez, observed in the Shetland Islands. By Tuomas Ep-
MONDSTON, Jun., Esq.
Monanpria Monoeynia.
1. Hippuris vulgaris. Deep muddy streams. Common.
2. Salicornia herbacea. Salt marshes. ~ Frequent.
Monanpria Dieynta.
8. Callitriche verna. Pools and marshes. Common.
Dianpria Monoeynia.
4. Veronica officinalis. Not very common. Chiefly in dry stony
places.—Var. 3. rigida. Common in all waste grounds: stem
erect; very rigid leaves, not serrated ; all the plant glabrous ; cap-
sule very distinctly winged.
montana. Rare. Ollaberry ; Northmavin.
——— Beccabunga. Rare. Near Tingwall.
Anagallis. Rare. Brook near Laxfirth Mainland.
5. Pinguicula vulgaris. Uncultivated grounds. Everywhere abundant.
Dranpria Dieynia.
6. Anthoranthum odoratum, Common.
Trianpria Monoeynta.
. Iris Pseudacorus. Common in all damp places.
. Schenus nigricans. Damp heaths. Abundant.
albus. Marshy places. Rare. Moola Unst.
9. Scirpus cespitosus. Heaths. Very abundant.
lacustris. Rare. Loch of Lund, Unst: probably not in-
digenous.
palustris. Salt marshes chiefly. Common.
10. Eriophorum vaginatum. On the more elevated heaths, as Her-
maness, Unst. Most common.
polystachion. All marshy places. Common.
11. Nardus stricta. Heathy grounds. Common.
CsI
TrRIANDRIA DiGyNIA.
12. Phalaris arundinacea. Common.
13. Phleum pratense. On the richer grounds abundant.
288 Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants.
14. Alopecurus geniculatus. Wet places. Common.
15. Agrostis vulgaris. Common.
— alba. Wet places. Abundant.
16. Aira cespitosa. Waste places. Not common.
—— flexuosa. Heaths. Frequent.
precox. Cultivated grounds. Common.
17. Holcus lanatus. Waste and cultivated ground. Common.
18. Melica cerulea. Heaths, &e. Common.
19. Poa trivialis. Pastures, &e. Common.
— pratensis. Meadows and pastures. Abundant.
— annua. Waste grounds. Common.
20. Glyceria fluitans. Streams and ditches, Abundant.
21. Briza media. Rare. Unst.
22. Dactylis glomerata. Pastures, &c. Common.
23. Cynosurus cristatus. Meadows and pastures.
24. Festuca ovina. Dry pastures. Common.
vivipara. Elevated heaths. Common.
duriuscula. Common.
elatior. Sides of lakes and streams. Rare.
25. Bromus mollis. Fields and waste grounds. Common.
arvensis. Fields. Rare.
26. Avena fatua. Not common. Shetland name Hug-aits.
27. Arundo Phragmites. Rare. Loch near Ronas-hill.
— Calamagrostis. Very rare. Loch near Faedaland, North-
mavin.
28. Lolium perenne. Meadows and pastures.
29. Elymus arenarius. Sandy sea-shores. Common.
30. Triticum repens. Everywhere common. Shetland name Whigga.
Terranpria Monoeynta.
31. Scabiosa succisa. All damp humid soils.
32. Asperula odorata. Dry banks. Rare. Bardister, Northmavin.
33. Galium savatile. Heaths. Abundant.
—verum. Dry banks. Frequent.
boreale. Sides of lakes. Not common.
Aparine. Sea-shores. Common.
34. Plantago major and lanceolata. Waste places. Common.
media. Not common.
maritima and Coronopus. Sea-shore. Common.
35. Alchemilla vulgaris. Fallow lands. Rare. Near Ollaberry.
alpina. Rare. Ronas-hill.
TETRANDRIA TETRAGYNIA.
36. Potamogeton natans. Shallow pools. Common.
a heterophyllus. Deeper ditches. Abundant.
37. Sagina procumbens. Waste grounds. Common.
Prenranpria Monoeynia.
38. Myosotis arvensis. Fields, &c. Common.
cespitosa. Brooks and pools. Abundant.
Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 289
39. Pulmonaria maritima. Gravelly sea-shores. Not common.
40. Lycopsis arvensis. Fields. Common.
41. Primula vulgaris. Dry pastures. Common.
42. Menyanthes trifoliata. Deep ditches. Common.
43. Anagallis tenella. Bogs. Not common.
44. Azalea procumbens. Rare. Ronas Hill, Northmavin.
45. Jasione montana. Dry banks. Common.
46. Viola canina. Common.
tricolor. Everywhere abundant.
47. Lonicera Periclymenum. Cliffs, &e. Not common.
48. Hedera Helix. Rare. Pictishburgh. Walls.
PenTANDRIA DIGyNIA.
49. Gentiana amarella. On limestone. Not common.
campestris. Pastures. Common.
50. Daucus Carota. Waste ground. Abundant.
51. Cherophyllum sylvestre. Waste places. Common.
52. Angelica sylvestris. Damp situations. Abundant.
53. Ligusticum scoticum. Rocky or sandy sea-shores.
54. Carum Carui. Damp meadows. Rare. Near Refirth, Island
of Yell: probably not indigenous.
55. Hydrocotyle vulgaris. Marshy places. Common.
56. Heracleum Sphondylium. Dry pastures. Abundant.
57. Conium maculatum. Shady situations. Not common.
58. Pastinaca sativa. Waste ground. Not common.
PENTANDRIA TETRAGYNIA.
59. Parnassia palustris, Wet meadows. Not common.
PENTANDRIA PENTAGYNIA.
60. Statice Armeria. Sea-shores. Abundant.
Limonium. Rare. Knab, near Lerwick.
61. Linum catharticum. Dry heaths. Common.
PENTANDRIA HEXAGYNIA.
62. Drosera longifolia. Rare. Lamhoga, Island of Fetlar.
— rotundifolia. Mossy hills. Rare. Yell and Northmavin.
Hexanpria Monoeyrnia.
63. Scilla verna. Common everywhere.
nutans. Rare. Probably not indigenous.
64. Narthecium ossifragum. Turfy heaths. Abundant.
65. Juncus effusus. Turfy bogs. Common. Shetland name, Floss.
trifidus. Elevated bogs. Not common.
squarrosus. Boggy heaths. Common.
uliginosus. Moist places, Common.
triglumis. Rare. Ronas Hill.
66. Luciola sylvatica. Shady glens. Abundant.
— campestris. Barren pastures. Common.
Hexanpria TRIGYNIA,
67. Rumee crispus. Very common.
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. U
290
68.
69.
72.
73.
Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants.
Rumer Acetosa and Acetosella. Abundant everywhere.
Triglochin palustre. Muddy situations. Common.
Hepranprta Monoeynta.
Trientalis europea. Mountain heaths. Rare. Hermaness, Unst.
Ocranpria MonoeGynia.
. Epilobium angustifolium. Cliffs. Not common.
montanum. Rare. Near Snarravoe, Unst.
palustre. Wet places. Abundant.
. Vaccinium Myrtillus. Dry heaths. Common.
Erica vulgaris (Calluna). Common.
cinerea. Common.
Tetralix, Abundant.
OcrTANDRIA TRIGYNIA.
Polygonum Persicaria, Abundant. Wet places.
Bistorta. Rare. Broo, Dunrossness.
aviculare. Cultivated grounds. Common.
Decanpria Monoecynia.
. Arbutus Uva-ursi. Not common.
— alpina. Rare. Ronas Hill.
DecanpRIA DiGynia.
. Saxifraga oppositifolia. Rare. Fitful Head.
DecanpriA TRIGYNIA.
. Silene maritima. Stony sea-shores, Abundant.
acaulis. Dry hills and stony places. Frequent.
. Stellaria media. Waste and cultivated ground. Common.
. Arenaria peploides. Sea-shores. Common. ;
marina. Sea-coast. Not rare.
norvegica. This interesting addition to the British Flora
is confined, so far as I know, to the serpentine formation around
the Bay of Baltasound in this island. Its specific description is
as follows:—Root fibrous, long; stems numerous, branched,
procumbent, sometimes more or less erect ; leaves small, ovate,
fleshy, glabrous, somewhat imbricate ; flowers terminal, solitary,
white, rather large ; petals generally six, sometimes five, broadly
ovate; calyx-sepals five, fleshy, glabrous as the leaves. Very
abundant on the gravelly barren hills to the north of the bay,
growing nearly on a level with the sea, along with Cerastium
latifolium and Cardamine hastulata, which, with the exception of
Statice Armeria and Plantago maritima, are almost the only
plants to be found in its vicinity.
I first discovered this plant in May 1837: I was then only
commencing the study of botany, and though I knew its genus,
and so marked it in my herbarium, I could not make out its
species.
In the end of July, the same year, Dr. Gilbert Macnab came
to Unst, in the course of a botanical tour he was making through
Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 291
Shetland ; I met him at some distance from Baltasound, and ac-
companied him thither; on the way, as he was questioning me
on the botany of the island, I mentioned two plants to him as
being (as I thought) rare or peculiar,—the one turned out to be
the Pisum maritimum of Linneus (Lathyrus pisiformis, Hook.
‘Br. Fl.’), the other was this species of Arenaria; I named to
him the genera to which the two plants belonged, but wished
to have his opinion on the species. Next day, in looking over
my little collection, we found the specimens of the two plants :
Dr. Macnab thought they were new to the British Flora, and
he had not seen them before; he was also of the same opinion
as myself as to their genera. I guided him to the localities
where I first found the two plants, and we procured abundance
of specimens. A few days after, when Dr. Macnab left Unst,
I gave him a number of specimens for the opinions of Drs.
Hooker and Graham. Dr. Graham at first pronounced it to be
nondescript, but was soon induced to change his opinion’ from
seeing a plant in Prof. Hooker’s herbarium (gathered by Sir
George Mackenzie in Iceland) labelled as Arenaria norvegica,
which he thought agreed with the Unst plant.
I have since botanically examined almost the whole of my
native islands, but I have not been able to find a single plant of
this species, except in the locality where it was first found by
me. I have only further to add, that I have endeavoured to
cultivate it by transplanting to a garden; I have not, however,
succeeded, although plants of Cardamine hastulata and Ceras-
tium latifolium, under the same circumstances, grew and took
root. I have, however, not had an opportunity of trying to
raise it from the seed.
. Cherleria sedoides. Rare. Hill of Klibberswick, Unst.
DECANDRIA PENTAGYNIA.
. Sedum Telephium. Rocks by the sea-side. Rare.
. Agrostemma Githago. Scarcely indigenous.
. Lychnis Flos-cuculi. Meadows and pastures. Common.
sylvatica (L. dioica). Fields, &c. Common.—/. ves-
pertina. Rare.
. Cerastium vulgatum. Fields and waste grounds. Common.
viscosum. Common.
tetrandrum. Sand. Rare. Balta Island.
latifolium. Tare. Near Baltasound only.
. Spergula arvensis. Abundant. Shetland name, Meldy.
IcosANDRIA PENTAGYNIA.
. Crategus Oxyacantha. Rare. Near Tingwall.
. Sorbus Aucuparia. Precipices and cliffs. Not common.
. Spirea Ulmaria. Swampy meadows. Common.
IcosANDRIA POLYGYNIA.
. Rosa tomentosa. Dry banks, &c. Abundant,
U2
292
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
o7-
98.
93:
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants.
Potentilla anserina. Waste grounds. Common. Roots sweet
and nutritious, and occasionally eaten under the name of ‘ Mur-
raks.’
Tormentilla officinalis. Dry heaths and pastures. Common.
reptans. Dry heaths. Rare.
Comarum palustre. Wet boggy ground. Common.
PotyanpriA Monoeynta.
Papaver Rheas. Corn-fields. Not common.
dubium., Common.
PoLyANDRIA PoLyGyYNIA.
Thalictrum alpinum. Moist heaths. Abundant.
Ranunculus Flammula. Watery places. Common.
repens. Dry barren pastures. Abundant.
acris. Abundant everywhere.
Ficaria ranunculoides. Meadows and pastures. Frequent.
Caltha palustris. Marshy places. Common.
DipynamiA GYNOSPERMIA.
Ajuga reptans. Common.
Lamium purpureum, Waste and cultivated grounds. Common.
intermedium. Not common.
Galeopsis Tetrahit. Cultivated grounds. Common.
Stachys palustris. Moist meadows. Common.
ambigua. Not common. ‘Tingwall.
Thymus Serpyllum. Dry heaths. Common.
Prunella vulgaris. Meadows and pastures. Common.
DipyNAMIA ANGIOSPERMIA.
Euphrasia officinalis. Dry pastures. Abundant.
Pedicularis sylvatica. Moist heaths. Abundant.
palustris. Boggy pastures. Common.
TETRADYNAMIA SILICULOSA.
. Draba incana. Rare. Unst and Fetlar.
. Thlaspi Bursa-pastoris. Waste and cultivated ground.
. Cochlearia officinalis. Sea-shore and inland. Common.
. Bunias Cakile. Sandy sea-shore. Common,
TETRADYNAMIA SILIQUOSA.
. Cardamine pratensis. Moist meadows. Common.
hastulata (Arabis petrea). Near Baltasound, Unst.
Rare.
. Sinapis arvensis. Corn-fields. Common. Shetland name
Runjy.
. Raphanus Raphanistrum. Fields. Common.
Monapepuia DECANDRIA.
. Geranium pheum. Rare. Island of Fetlar.
molle. Meadows and pastures. Common.
113.
114.
115.
116.
LT?
118.
. Vicia Cracca. Meadows and pastures. Common.
. Trifolium repens. Meadows and pastures. Common.
Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 293
DiapEeLtpuiaA HExanpria.
Fumaria parviflora. Sandy fields. Abundant.
DrapELPuia OcranpRria.
Polygala vulgaris. Dry heaths. Common.
DiaADELPHIA DECANDRIA.
Ulex europeus. Dry heaths. Not common. Hill of Wormie-
dale.
Anthyllis Vulneraria. Dry pastures. Abundant.
Pisum maritimum (var.). Very rare. Sandy down. Burraforth,
Unst, only. Root very long, creeping to a great extent, send-
ing up stems at intervals; stem procumbent, angular; sti-
pulas sagittate; tendrils with 3—5 pair of lanceolate, glaucous,
dark green leaflets; racemes terminal, on long peduncles ;
flowers shortly pedicellate, moderately large; wings very
beautiful, bright purple, with darker veins ; standard and keel
whitish. This plant was first added to the ‘ Flora Scotica’ by
myself in June 1837.
Lathyrus pratensis. Fields and way-sides. Common.
pratense. Dry meadows, &c. Abundant.
. Lotus corniculatus. Pastures. Common.
PoLYADELPHIA PoLYANDRIA.
. Hypericum pulchrum. Dry heaths. Frequent.
SYNGENESIA AUQUALIS.
. Sonchus arvensis. Corn-fields. Common.
oleraceus. Waste or cultivated ground. Frequent.
. Leontodon Taraxacum. Meadows and pastures. Not common.
autumnale. Common.
. Hieraceum sylvaticum. Dry banks. Frequent.
maculatum. Abundant.
. Arctium lappa. Sandy soils. Rare. Dunrossness.
. Carduus lanceolatus. Waste and cultivated ground. Common.
arvensis. Corn-fields. Common.
. Onopordum Acanthium. Gravelly soils. Not common.
SYNGENESIA SUPERFLUA.
. Tanacetum vulgare. Road-sides, &c. Abundant.
. Artemisia vulgaris. Waste ground. Common.
. Gnaphalium dioicum. Heaths and dry pastures. Common.
. Serratula alpina (Saussurea alpina). Rare. Ronas Hill.
. Tussilago Farfara. Clayey soils. Not common.
Petasites. Humid meadows. Not uncommon.
. Senecio vulgaris. Cultivated grounds. Common.
Jacobea. Meadows and pastures. Common.
294
135.
136.
137.
138.
139.
140.
141.
142.
143.
144.
145.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants.
Solidago Virgaurea. Dry heaths and pastures. Common.
Bellis perennis. Meadows and pastures. Common.
Pyrethrum inodorum. Waste grounds. Common.
Chrysanthemum Leucanthemum. Meadows and pastures. Fre-
uent.
Achillea Millefolium. Dry meadows. Common.
Ptarmica. Humid meadows. Common.
GynanpriA Monanppla.
Orchis mascula. Meadows and pastures. Frequent.
latifolia. Wet situations. Abundant.
Satyrium viride (Habenaria virid.). Heaths. Common.
Zostera marina. Sea-shore. Abundant.
Monacr1a Monanpria.
Euphorbia helioscopia. Cultivated grounds. Common.
Monacia TRIANDRIA.
Carex dioica. Marshes. Abundant.
ovalis. Heaths. Not common.
—— arenaria. Sandy sea-shores, Common.
recurva. Dry heaths. Common.
——. binervis. Moist heaths. Frequent.
—— ampullacea. Watery situations.
Monacia TerranpRia.
Sparganium natans. Lakes. Abundant.
simplex. Common.
Littorella lacustris (Plantago uniflora). Common.
Urtica dioica. Roads and way-sides. Common.
Myriophyllum spicatum. Ditches and pools. Frequent.
Betula alba, Shady banks. Not common.
Diacra DIANDRIA.
Salix fusca. Dry heaths. Common.
aurita. Banks of lakes, &c. Abundant.
aquatica. Watery places. Not common.
herbacea. Rare. Ronas Hill.
Diacra TRIANDRIA.
. Empetrum nigrum. Heaths. Common. Berries greedily de-
voured by Lestris parasiticus.
Diacia OcTANDRIA.
. Rhodiola rosea. Rocks and cliffs. Common.
Diacr1a MonapELPuHia.
3. Juniperus communis. Rare. Cliffs, Koningsburgh.
Mr. T. Edmondston’s List of Shetland Plants. 295
Potyeamia Monacta.
154. Atriplex laciniata. Sea-coast. Common.
patula. Cultivated and waste ground.
CryproGaMiIA FILices.
155. Polypodium vulgare. Walls and shady banks. Common.
156. Aspidium Filiz-mas. Common.
Filiz-femina. Common.
157. Scolopendrium vulgare. Moist shady places. Rare.
158. Osmunda regalis. Very rare. Near Sandwick, Unst.
Lunaria. Hilly pastures. Common.
159. Ophioglossum vulgatum. Very rare. Burn of Sundybanks,
near Scalloway, Mainland.
Cryprocamia LycopopiAceEz.
160. Lycopodium clavatum. Rare. Ronas Hill.
Selaginoides. Moist heaths. Common.
Selago. Also abundant.
CrypToGaMia EQuisETACE.
161. Equisetum sylvaticum. Shady banks. Not common.
fluviatile. Wet places. Rare. Loch of Cliff.
palustre. Marshes. Common.
arvense. Moist fields. Abundant.
EXTINCT SPECIES.
Pinus Picea.
An old man told me that he found a fir tree, about six feet below
the surface of the ground, when digging peat at the east side of Unst.
It was about forty feet in length, and about six feet in circum-
ference. It was much decayed on the outside, but quite sound in the
heart.
The cones of the Silver Fir (according to Dr. Neill) have been
found in the peat moors in Orkney, although I am not aware of their
being observed in Shetland ; and as this species seems, when planted,
to succeed the best of all its tribe, it may be supposed that the tree
in question was of this species.
Corylus Avellana.
The nuts and trunks of this tree have also at different times been
dug up in the peat moors.
296 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
XXX V.—On the Composition of Chalk Rocks and Chalk Marl
by invisible Organic Bodies: from the Observations of Dr.
Ehrenberg*. By Tuomas Weaver, [Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S.,
NR AISA’ occ. Ses
Tue remarkable discoveries effected, and the new light
thrown on geology by the indefatigable researches of Dr.
Ehrenberg, during several years past, through the medium of
the microscope, particularly in respect of the Infusoria and
Polythalamia tribes, highly instructive and interesting as they
must be to all naturalists, are especially so to the geologist,
since they open to him a large field of inquiry, eminently de-
serving of cultivation. ‘To draw attention to this subject, which
involves no less than an investigation as to what extent minute
organic bodies, invisible to the naked eye, may have contri-
buted to the production of all limestone formations, whether
of an origin posterior or anterior to the epoch of the chalk,
descending thus in the series to the primary limestones, it ap-
peared to me that a sketch taken from a portion of the labours
of Dr. Ehrenberg might be not only useful, but especially ac-
ceptable to such geologists as may not be conversant with the
language of the original. I propose then, in the first instance,
to advert briefly to the earlier researches of Dr. Ehrenberg
concerning the Coral tribes in general, and those of the Red
Sea in particular {; and in the second, to present such extracts
from the Memoir, the title of which stands at the head of this
paperS, as may answer the purpose of a general view.
At the instigation of the Royal Academy of Sciences of Ber-
lin ||, Dr. Ehrenberg and his friend, the late Dr. Hemprich,
* Communicated by the Author.
+ With an Appendix touching the researches of M. Alcide d’Orbigny.
+ See in the Abhand. der Konig. Acad. d. Wissenschaften zu Berlin for
the year 1832 :—
1. Contributions to the physiological knowledge of the Coral animals in
general, and in particular of those of the Red Sea, with an attempt to clas-
sify them according to their physiological distinctions; read 3rd March,
1831, with additions printed Ist Dec. 1833, pp. 225-880.
2. On the Nature and Structure of the Coral Banks of the Red Sea, read
22nd March 1832; revised and printed in Feb. 1834, pp. 381-482.
§ Ueber die Bildung der Kreidefelsen und des Kreidemergels durch un-
sichtbare Organismen, in the Transactions of the Royal Academy of Sciences
of Berlin, for the year 1838, read 20th Dec. 1858, and 18th Feb. 1839,
pp: 59-149.
|| See the Report read to the Academy by M. Alr. von Humboldt on the
Travels of Doctors Ehrenberg and Hemprich through Egypt, Dongola, Syria,
Arabia, and the Eastern declivity of the highlands of Abyssinia, in the years
1820-1825, conveying a clear idea of the arduous and extraordinary la-
bours of those gentlemen in all branches of Natural History: Berlin, 1826.
Dr. Hemprich fell a sacrifice to his exertions in Abyssinia, on the 30th of
June, 1825,
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 2¢
visited the Red Sea during a period of eighteen months, name~
ly, nine months from the year 1823 to 182: 4, and an equal
number in 1825, having been nearly twelve months of the time
on board ship, in which interval they passed over nearly the
whole extent of that sea, saw many of its islands and coral
banks, and landed with a view to special examination on forty-
eight different points of the two coasts; but the whole number
of islands and special points of the coast seen by them amounts
to about 150, independently of the long coast of Sinai in Ara-
bia, which they examined in continuity. In these laborious
efforts, attended with extreme danger, they collected 110 spe-
cies of Coral animals, being nearly three times as many as had
been found or described by all former observers, namely, by
Shaw, Forska! and Savigny, and later by Riippel.
To determine the subjects of that collection with the greater
precision, it became necessary to undertake a review of the
whole class of the Coral animals, and the more so as Dr.
Ehrenberg found that his own observations were frequently
in collision with the systematic distinctions that have prevailed
up to the present time. In this review the author has espe-
cially compared the four most recent extensive systems, name-
ly, of Schweigger in 1820, Rapp in 1829, Cuvier in 1830, and
Blainville likewise in 1830, which may be said to embody the
judgment of the present generation upon the labours of earlier
periods, and to comprise the sum of existing knowledge in
this department of natural history. He has in particular
turned his attention to the work ot Blainville *, since it con-
tains the greatest number of new details, having been enriched
by the latest manuscript observations and drawings of Quoy
and Gaimard, the result of their second voyage round the
world with Capt. D’Urville. In these newer works, the la-
bours of Lamarck having been critically employed, the author
was relieved from the necessity of noticing them in a special
manner.
The attempt to reconcile the observed discrepancies led the
author to separate the Coral animals into two organic natural
groups, which are well marked and distinct from each other,
and which he named Anthozoa (Flower-animals) and Bryozoa
(Moss-animals). In the course of these researches the author
found that the whole group of the Anthozoa, which consist of
the proper (single-mouthed) coral animals, and which had
been gradually distributed under more than 158 generic names,
including even heterogeneous animals and plants, might, ac-
cording to his own observations of their correspondence in
* Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, 1830.
Tribus I.
298 Mr. Weaver's View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
affinity and relations of structure and development, be reduced
to eighty-six genera, but which number might perhaps be still
further diminished, as a few genera might be classed as sub-
genera. The Anthozoa he has divided into two orders, 200-
corallia (Animal-corals) and Phytocorallia (Plant-corals). In
the Memoir is given a systematic description of the Orders,
Tribes, Families, Genera and Species of the Anthozoa, while
further details are reserved for the author’s work, entitled,
Symbole Physica, The subjoined Table will show the general
arrangement, extending to the genera.
ANTHOZOA.
Ore ventriculoque distinctis, tubo cibario anoque discreto nullis, corpore
intus radiatim lamelloso. (Vibratio nulla, gemmez et spontanea divisio
frequentissimz.)
Orvo I.—Zoocoratiia.
Corpore aut omnino molli, aut Cephalopodum more intus lapidem gene-
rante (secernente nec excernente) hinc szepe omnino libera et, preter for-
mam, animalium characteres omnes perfectius servantia.
Species.
————— |
Of the Red Sea.
Ue ——_~-—_———_,
b 8
$ : 3 = ol Genera.
is ge 3
5 eel OPP cle
( 16 29 1. Actinia.
1 1 2. Metridium.
=p : con 1 1 3. Megalactis.
Familia I. Actinina. 1? nas ie 4. Thalassianthus.
Genera 9. See
eee ies lisa : A se 1 10 5. Cribrina.
pecies living . 50. 1 3 6. hn cacan
In the Red Sea 23. a! i ae pL OCR One
a} anc Dey oy 7. Epicladia.
a sfc Das |e ool 8. Heterodactyla.
8 aes vee | 3 9, Lucernaria.
a F353 2 3 10. Hughea.
< | Fam. Il. ZoanTHINA. 1 Bais 2 11. Zoanthus.
s Genera 4. Fossil 2. 1 1 ete 4 12. Mammillifera.
= Species living . 12. ses 2 3 13. Palythoa.
5 In the Red Sea 7. ane spons | es F. Siphonia.
3 50° F. Lymnorea.
LN 500 a7 leer. F. 14. Fungia.
Sot 1 5 See 15. Haliglossa.
Fam. III. FUNGINA. ;
Genera 6. Fossil 5. +5 Z ¢ F. sid Pied ea
| Species living . 12. ek eee F 18. eens
| Inthe Red Sea _ 3. hg of r. 19) Trochopal
cee |e ES Diploctenium.
Tribus Il.
Tribus III.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 299
Species.
ss S SS
Of the Red Sea.
ae
> &
S = =
a 25 =
= as °
See) ~
{ Fam. IV. XENINA. 2 3
Genera 3. is Rebs 3
Species living . 7. a z I
In the Red Sea 6. es
Fam. V. TUBIPORINA.
Genus 1. | Bats 2
Fes Species living . 3. “ar
i In the Red Sea 1.
z co: 1 1
s | Fam. VI. Hatcyonina. eae 5 12
Ss | Genera 6. ee 2 2
1 = Species living 28. ace 2 4
=| In the Red Sea 13 & ena ene
= zee ]
$ | Fam. VIE, PENNATULINA. ihe 4
ws | (a) Haviscerrra. i 1
Genera 4. J rss 1
| Species living . 7. fara l
In the Red Sea 0. | po
(8) HavreTeria. 2
Genera 3. Fossil 1. xs 3
Species living . 10. = hate
{ In the Red Sea 0. ae
Fam. VIII. Hyprina. {
{3 Genera 2. { 500 4
' Species living . 6. ves ee 2
s In the Red Sea 0. L
co | Fam. [X. TUBULARINA. ses 4
ro) Genera 4. 500 | 3
S j Species living . 12. mats 4
= In the Red Sea 0. HOC 1
S | Fam. X. SERTULARINA. | (
g Genus 1. 4 1? 4
N Species living . 4. ce
L Inthe Red Sea 1. [
ZOOCORALLIA... 5 49 151
Fossil
Genera. Genera.
soe 20. Xenia.
ae 21. Anthelia.
22. Rhizoxenia.
23. Tubipora.
24, Haleyonium.
25. Lobularia.
26. Ammothea.
27. Nephthya.
28. Sympodium.
29. Cliona.
30. Veretillum.
31. Pavonaria.
32. Umbellularia.
33. Scirpearia.
ao8 34. Renilla.
F.? | 35. Virgularia.
36. Pennatula.
37. Hydra.
38. Coryna.
39. Syncoryna.
40. Tubularia.
41. Eudendrium.
42. Pennaria.
43. Sertularia.
8
Tribus IV.
Tribus V.
Tribus VI.
cc
Se
Tribus VII.
(SSeS
300 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
Orvo I].—PuytocoraLitia.
Corpore aut lapideam aut corneam materiam adglutinantem secernente,
ac dorso (solea) excernente ejusque ope semper adnato (Ostrearum more),
Familia XI. OCELLINA.
Genera 14. Fossil 12.
Species living 41.
In the Red Sea 7.
Fam. XII. DEDALINA.
(a) ASTREINA.
Genera 4. Fossil 3.
Species living 28.
In the Red Sea 15.
Phytocorallia
Polyactinia
(8) MH ANDRINA.
Genera 7. Fossil 6.
Species living 28.
In the Red Sea _ 5.
Fam. XIII. MADREPORINA.
Genera 3. Fossil 3. |
aa
= Specics living 41.
zs In the Red Sea 24.
2 § ) Fam. XIV. MILLEPoRINA.
— Genera 4. Fossil 2.
re A | Species living 23.
L In the Red Sea 11.
Fam. XV. ISIDEA.
Genera 4.
Species living 10.
S
= Ss In the Red Sea 1.
Sac
Be
Co Co
os
~_—-
=S
oe
Fam. XVI. GORGONINA.
Genera 6. Fossil 1.
Species living 63.
In the Red Sea 3.
ts]
= ¢ | Fam. XVII. ALLOPORINA.
Sac Genus 1.
o+ . sos
oes Species living
= op In the Red Sea Z
a o)
PHYTOCORALLIA ......
LOOCORAUEULA Ts: «<05s5|
AN DHOZOA wes taserieer
Species.
rr ee areas |
Of the Red Sea.
ee)
3 tb Fossil
z oe £& | Genera.
Be ete simi
AD PEED As:
Sy RSG oder
ane 1 1 F.
ape Abe 3 F.
ads 1 9 F,
ate ale 4 [de
aie 3 8 F.
Jerpagae ADE 6 F.
Ana it a aks
1 4 F.
pS
2 Tol climate
4 7 F.
8 14 F.
F.
2 7 F.
2 12 F.
ra 1 noe
1 4 F.
2 F.
2 F.
7 21 90
itr 20 F.
ae F.
4 6 ans
2 7 le
3 10 50
1
ade 4
1 3
2
3
10
23 5A
1? 4 cae
12 F.?
11
1
61 235 27
; 49 151 8
0 110 386 | 30
120 |
Genera.
. Desmophyllum.
. Cyathina.
. Stephanocora.
- Monomyces.
- Oculina.
. Turbinaria.
. Explanaria.
- Cladocora.
. Columnaria.
. Strombodes.
. Cyathophyllum.
. Pterorrhiza.
. Anthophyllum.
. Stylina.
. Caryophyllia.
. Favia.
. Astrea,
. Favosites.
. Meandrina.
. Manicina.
. Merulina.
. Pavonia.
. Agaricia.
. Polyastra.
. Monticularia.
. Heteropora.
. Madrepora.
. Catenipora.
Pleurodictyum.
. Calamopora.
. Seriatopora.
. Millepora.
. Pocillopora.
. Corallium.
. Melitza.
. Mopsea.
. Isis.
. Prymnoa.
. Muricea.
. Eunicea.
. Plexaura.
. Gorgonia,
. Pterogorgia.
. Allopora,
a —
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 301
In the preceding Table we see that of the forty-three genera
of Zoocorallia, there are eight which are found fossil; the
living species amount to 151, of which fifty-four exist in the
Red Sea, and forty-nine of these have been observed by the
author, five remaining unproved. Of the forty-three genera
of Phytocorallia there are twenty-seven which are found fos-
sil; the living species amount to 235, of which sixty-six exist
in the Red Sea, and sixty-one of these have been observed by
the author, five remaining unproved. ‘The general result is,
that out of eighty-six genera of Anthozoa, thirty-five occur in
the fossil state; and that of 386 known living species of An-
thozoa, 120 exist in the Red Sea, of which 110 species were
observed by the author. The same Table also shows that of
the seventeen families of known Coral animals, thirteen exist
in the Red Sea, while four are wholly wanting, namely, those
of Pennatulina, Hydrina, Tubularina and Alloporina. The
total number of known living species comprised in each family
is also given, as well as the relative number actually existing
in the Red Sea.
The 120 species of Anthozoa existing in the Red Sea thus
constitute nearly one third of the whole number of living spe-
cies, and being comprised in forty-four genera, the latter rather
exceed one half of the number of known living genera.
Of the known living Corals there are eight genera peculiar
to the Red Sea, namely, Megalactis, Thalassianthus?, Epi-
cladia, Heterodactyla, Anthelia, Ammothea, Stephanocora and
Strombodes. It appears also that eighty-eight species are pecu-
liar to it, not having been hitherto observed anywhere else.
Among the genera of the Red Sea that of Strombodes excites
peculiar interest, having previously been found only in the fos-
sil state. It affords a key to the structure of the remarkable
Cyathophylla, differing from the view hitherto entertained,
and rendering it quite clear that the internal central star of
the encased forms is not a young one, but the oldest or mo-
ther star, which is often surrounded by broad radiated mantle-
folds productive of buds.
It appears probable that the Red Sea and the part of the
Mediterranean so nearly adjoining on the Libyan coast, pos-
sess only two forms out of the 120 species in common, namely,
Actinia Tapetum and A. Mesembryanthemum.
Of the Bryozoa group, Dr. Ehrenberg gave in the same
memoir, contained in the volume of the Transactions for 1832,
only the more general results of his investigations, without en-
tering into detail; but the subject is resumed in his later me-
moir, inserted in the volume for 1838, in which he has pre-
sented a tabular view of the Bryozoa, distributed into Orders,
302 Mr. Weaver’s View of Khrenberg’s Observations
Families and Genera, with their characteristics. According to
this view the Bryozoa comprise four Orders, Polythalamia,
Gymnocore, Thallopodia and Scleropodia; the Polythalamia
being divided into Monosomatia (single-bodied), consisting of
fifty-six genera, and Polysomatia (many-bodied or polyparian),
composed of twenty-two genera, forming altogether seventy-
eight genera of Polythalamia. ‘The following ‘Table exhibits
the general arrangement.
Bryozoa.
Animalia asphycta, tubo cibario simplici, sacciformi aut tubuliformi, vera
corporis articulatione nulla aut sensim numerosiore, corporis forma
gemmis aut novis articulis accedentibus sensim aucta, hinc indefinita,
nunquam sponte dividua, omnia et singula verisimiliter periodice ovi-
para, ideoque hermaphrodita.
Orvo I.—PoLyTHALaMIA.
Libere vagantia et loricata.
Monosomatia.
Familia I. Mirrorra.
Genera 2. ? Miliola, ? Gromia.
Familia II. Noposarrna.
Gen. 11. Glandulina, Mucronina, Nodosaria, Ortho-
cerina, Dentalina, Lingulina, Frondicularia,
Rimulina, Vaginulina, Planularia, Marginu-
lina.
Familia III]. Texrurartia.
Gen. 6. Bigenerina, ? Dimorphina, Textularia, Gram-
mostomum (Vulvudaria), Polymorphina, Vir-
gulina,
Familia TV. Uvetcina.
Gen. 11. Guttulina (et Globulina), Uvigerina, Bulimi-
na, Valvulina, Rosalina, Clavulina, Globige-
rina, Pyrulina, Sphzeroidina.
Familia V. Rovratina.
Gen. 22. Operculina, Soldania, Planorbulina, Rotalia,
Trochulina, ? Spirulina, Calcarina, Pleuro-
trema, Planulina, Discorbis ,Omphalophacus,
? Gyroidina, Truncatulina, Lenticulina, No-
nionina, Cristellaria, Siderolina, Dendritina,
Robulina, Anomalina, Saracenaria, Cassidu-
lina.
Familia VI. Prtcaritia.
Gen. 6. Biloculina, Spiroloculina, Triloculina, Arti-
culina, Quinqueloculina, Adelosina.
Polysomatia.
Familia. VII. Astrroptscrna.
Gen. 5. Asterodiscus, Lunulites, Orbitulites, Cupu-
laria, Flustrella.
Familia VIII. Soritrna.
Gen. 2. Sorites, Amphisorus.
Familia IX. FRUMENTARINA.
Gen. 3. ? Dactylopora, ? Ovulites, ? Polytripe.
Familia X, HeEttcosorra.
Gen. 5. Peneroplis, Pavonina, Vertebralina, Orbicu-
lina, ? Heterostegina.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 303
Familia XI. HeticorrocHina.
Gen, 3. Polystomella, ? Amphistegina, ? Geoponus,
Familia XII. ALvEoLinea.
Gen. 2. Melonia, Alveolina.
Familia XIII. Fasurarina.
Gen. 2. Fabularia, Coscinospira.
Orvo II.—Gymnocorz.
Libere vagantes, nudz.
Familia I. CrisTATELLINA.
Gen. 2. Cristatella, Zoobotryon.
Orpo I[IJ].—Tuattoropia.
Stolonibus thallove membranaceo affixa, incrustantia
nec adnata, sed loricata.
Familia I. Hatcyone tea.
Gen. 8. Halcyonella, Vesicularia, Bowerbankia, Far-
rella (= Lagenella) *, Valkeria, Stephani-
dium, n. G., Dynamene, Halodactylus (=
Alcyonidium).
Familia If. Cornutarina.
Gen. 1. ? Cornularia.
Familia III. Escuarina.
Gen. 5. Eschara, Melicertina (= WMelicerita) +,
Crisia, Acamarchis, Notamia.
Familia IV. CrLierorina.
Gen. 5. Cellepora, Flustra, Membranipora, Briolo-
phus, n. G., Apsendesia.
Familia V. AvLoporINa.
Gen. 1. Tubulipora.
Orvo IV.—Scteroropia.
Stolonibus destituta, excreto fulcro axique anorganicis
firmiter affixa eisque fruticulosa.
Familia I. Myrrioporina.
Gen. 9. Hornera, Idmonea, Retipora, Distichopora,
Myriopora, Tilesia, Cricopora, Ceriopora,
Spiropora.
Familia I]. ? ANTIPATHINA.
Gen. 1. Antipathes.
“The two last orders, the Thallopodia and Scleropodia,”
the author observes, ‘‘are considerably richer in forms, and
it would be very easy by an uncritical compilation to enlarge
greatly the number of names; but such confusion has been
produced in names by Lamouroux and later writers, the same
body being often designated by many new names, that I shall
not venture to extend my judgment further at present. What
* The name Lagenella was appropriated to an infusorial form in 1832.
+ Melicerta is already employed among the Radiaria, Melicertum with
the Acalepha, Melicerita is not correct in ‘language.
Perhaps hereafter it may be advisable to substitute Textilaria for Tex-
tularia, Polystomatium for Polystomella, Cyclodiscus for Discorbis, &c.
304. Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
has been advanced will suffice to show clearly the position of the
Polythalamia, such as it appears to me, in the animal kingdom.”
On Chalk and Chalk Marl.
The memoir on the chalk and chalk marl is distributed
under the following heads :—
1. Historical Introduction, pp. 59—68.
2. New method of observing, pp. 68—70.
3. On calcareous-shelled organisms, invisible to the naked
eye, as the principal constituents of writing-chalk, pp. 70—74.
4. On Chalk Marl and its relations to Chalk, and to the
Flints of the Chalk, pp. 74—87.
5. On the compact limestone of Upper Egypt and Arabia,
as formed by the Polythalamian calcareous animalcules of the
White Chalk of Europe, pp. 87—90.
6. On the principal organic calcareous forms which con-
stitute all chalk, and the local differences, pp. 90—95.
7. Preliminary view of new researches respecting living
Polythalamia, and their relation to the formation of the sand
of Sea Downs, pp. 96—106.
8. Application of the preceding observations to the system-
atic distinctions of Polythalamia, with a tabular view of the
Bryozoa, according to their orders, families and genera, with
their characteristics, pp. 107—121.
(N.B. Of this tabular view I have given a transcript above.)
9. On the geographical distribution of living Polythalamia
on the African and Asiatic coasts of the Mediterranean, and
in the Red Sea, with a tabular view of the genera and species,
pp. 121—127.
10. A concise Diagnosis of the new families, genera and
species,
1. Of the siliceous Infusoria of the chalk marl, con-
taining thirty-one new species, of which seventeen
species belong to five new genera, and fourteen
species to five former-known genera, pp. 128—130.
2. Of the calcareous-shelled Polythalamian animalcules
of the chalk and sea sand, sixty-seven new species,
beside two new species from the Jura (Oolite) lime-
stone, pp. 130—135.
11. A summary view of the conclusions drawn from the
preceding expositions, pp. 135—139.
12. Explanation of the Plates, pp. 140—147.
13. A tabular view of the organic bodies invisible to the
naked eye, which form the chief constituents of chalk, chalk
marl, the compact limestone of Egypt and Arabia, and the
nummulitic limestone of the Pyramids of Geza or Gyzeh.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 305
The reader being thus put in possession of the general scope
of the work, I now proceed to exhibit in full the conclusions
to which the author has been led (as indicated under the head
of No. 11), to which I shall subjoin further extracts taken from
different portions of the Memoir, for the purpose of general
illustration.
Conclusions.
1. Many, and probably all, White Chalk Rocks are the pro-
duce of microscopic coral-animalcules, which are mostly quite
invisible to the naked eye, possessing calcareous shells of 51,
to 54, line in magnitude, and of which much more than one
million are well preserved in each cubic inch, that is, much
more than ten millions in one pound of chalk *.
2. The Chalk Marls of the Mediterranean Basin are the
produce of microscopic Infusoria possessing siliceous shells or
cases, mostly quite invisible to the naked eye, intermingled
with a small proportion of the calcareous animalcules of the
chalk.
3. The peculiar state of aggregation in White Chalk does
not arise from a precipitate of lime previously held in solution
in the water of the sea, nor is it the result of the accumulation
of the small animalcules, but it proceeds from a disintegration
of the assembled microscopic organisms into much minuter
inorganic calcareous particles; the reunion of which into re-
gular, elliptical, granular lamine, is caused by a peculiar cry-
stalloid process, which may be compared to crystallization, but
is of a coarser nature, and essentially different from it. The
best writing chalk is that in which this process has been deve-
loped to the greatest extent.
4. The compact limestone rocks also which bound the Nile
in the whole of Upper Egypt and extend far into the Sahara
or Desert, being neither white nor of a staining quality, as
well as the West Asiatic compact limestone rocks in the north
of Arabia, are, in the mass, composed of the coral animalcules
of the European chalk. ‘This affords a new insight into the
ancient history of the formation of Libya from Syene to the
* Tt is to be understood that I speak only of such Polythalamia as are
well preserved, wholly disregarding their fragments. Of the well-preserved
there are contained in one fourth part of a cubic line, or in one twelfth of
a grain of chalk, frequently 150 to 200 in number, equal to 600-800 in
each cubic line, or 1800-2400 in each grain, and from 1,036,000 to
1,382,400 in each cubic inch ; and hence in one pound of chalk the num-
ber far exceeds ten millions.
The larger Polythalamia and Bryozoa of the chalk are best obtained from
the sediment produced by brushing the chalk under water; the entirely
microscopic forms remain long suspended in water. :
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. x
306 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
Atlas, and of Arabia from Sinai to Lebanon, thus opening a
large field to organic distribution.
5. Many of the chalk-like formations bordering on the Me-
diterranean in Sicily, Barbary and Greece, really belong to
the period of the European chalk formation, as proved by
their organic contents, although commonly held to be differ-
ent from the chalk, and considered as tertiary *.
6. The chalk beds of the South of Europe, around the ba-
sin of the Mediterranean, are distinguished from those of the
north and east of Europe by numerous well-preserved chalk
animalcules, and less numerous inorganic laminz; while in
the north and east of Europe these relations are reversed +.
7. In the South of Europe the beds of marl which alternate
with the chalk consist of siliceous shells of Infusoria, and flints
are wanting; while in the North of Europe beds of flint al-
ternate with the chalk, and marls with Infusoria are wanting.
This exchange of character tends to explain the peculiar re-
lation of flint to chalk, indicating that the pulverulent sili-
ceous particles of Infusoria have been converted into compact
nodules of flint.
8. It has been lately remarked that the chalk which con-
tains flints is deficient in numerous siliceous Infusoria, when
compared with the Bilin slaty Tripel or polishing slate (Po-
lirschiefer) containing semi-opal; but this deficiency now dis-
appears, and a rich substitute takes its place, the Infusoria in
the North of Europe having been employed in the formation
of flints; while in the south, remaining unchanged, they are
preserved in the Infusoria marls.
9. The chalk animalcules resemble most those of the sea-
sand and the Miliolites, which, up to the present day, have
been ranged among the Mollusks with the Cephalopods; but
neither of these are either Cephalopods or Mollusks, nor even
Infusoria (as asserted by a late observer); but they are Bry-
ozoa, animals of Moss-corals, which are most nearly related
to Flustra and Eschara.
10. ‘The sea downs of some, and probably of most coasts,
are still in course of formation by living Bryozoa, which,
though very small, resembling grains of sand, are yet, for the
most part, larger than the chalk animalcules, and a large pro-
* In Sicily, however, there occur many breccias of chalk, which have
suffered a subsequent change, and may be referred to the tertiary epoch.
¢ Thus in the white and yellow soft writing chalk of the North of Europe
the inorganic crystalloid portions sometimes equal or rather exceed in mass
the organic remains; but in the South of Europe, in Sicily, these organisms
with their fragments are greatly predominant, consisting, as it appears, ex-
clusively of well-preserved Polythalamia.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 307
portion of the sand ot the Libyan Desert has been proved to
consist of such grains. It is only in Nubia above Syene that
the desert sand becomes a pure detritus of granite *.
11. In the variouscountries of the earth in which occur white
and earthy, as well as coloured and compact rocks, composed
of microscopic calcareous animalcules, the genera and species
of these animalcules present so striking an agreement with
those of the white chalk of Riigen, that they may well be
deemed characteristic of one and the same period of geolo-
gical formation. It cannot be asserted for a certainty that
the same forms have been observed any where elset.
12. In the beds subjacent to and more ancient than the
chalk, namely, in those of the Oolite or Jura limestone for-
mation, we have also clear evidence of the existence of other
microscopic Polythalamia. ‘These, however, are such as have
not hitherto been found anywhere in the chalk.
13. The early assertion that al/ limestone was the produce
of animals}, though resting on no sufficient foundation, and
therefore justly held in slight regard by modern geologists,
yet now deserves every attention, since it clearly appears that
a limestone formation widely extended on the surface of the
earth is composed of microscopic animals, visibly converted
in a gradual manner into inorganic chalk and compact lime-
stone. If similar phenomena appear also in the Jura lime-
stone formation, and should become still further confirmed,
these considerations (combined with the long-known existence
of coarser corals and shells in both formations) tend to show
how necessary it is, when examining the composition of any con-
siderable portion of the solid mass of the earth, to strengthen
our natural senses by artificial means, in order to obtain a di-
stinct knowledge of the extent to which organic life may have
contributed to its production.
14. The extreme minuteness of the chalk animalcules is stri-
kingly proved by this, that even in the finest levigated whiting
multitudes of them are still present, and may be applied with-
out suffering change to the most varied technical purposes.
Thus in the chalk coating given to painted chambers, paper,
or even glazed visiting-cards (when not coated with white lead
* On these very interesting and not easily developed relations, I hope,
at a future day, to be able to make a more special communication.
+ If I have applied the same name in some cases both to animalcules of
the chalk and to forms existing in the present sea-sand, or in recent fossil
beds, it has arisen partly from my being unacquainted with the original forms
of the latter, and partly from my desire not to create unnecessary perplex-
ity by the adoption of new names. It should be observed that they are di-
stinguished by marks of interrogation. All those which I could really com-
pare were different.
t By Linneeus in 1745 and 1748, and Buffon in 1749.
X 2
308 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
alone), may be seen a pretty mosaic of well-preserved, moss-
coral animalcules, but which are invisible to the naked eye.
And thus our natural vision receives from such a surface the
impression of the purest white, little deeming that it contains
the bodies of millions of self-existing beings, of varied and
beautiful forms, more or less closely crowded together (as in
Plate IV., where the subjects are magnified 300 times).
Explanation of the Plates and Tabular View.
The Memoir is accompanied by four Plates*, presented with
the view of facilitating a comparison between the organic re-
lations of minute fossil bodies invisible to the naked eye, and
those of still living bodies visible to the naked eye.
Thus the first three Plates exhibit recent small bodies natu-
rally visible, with which the naturally invisible forms of the
fourth Plate may be readily associated.
The first three Plates serve also to elucidate the true nature
of the Polythalamia (hitherto mistaken), showing their greater
affinity to the Bryozoa (Flustra) than to all other animal
forms, and in particular the great difference there is between
them and Cephalopods and Infusoria. ‘They represent partly
the unfolded, soft, external parts of living subjects, and partly
dead, naked bodies, artificially divested of their calcareous
shell, and not hitherto figured.
Lastly, these first three Plates serve to convey a view, ac-
cording to some of their principal divisions, of the structure
of the whole group of forms occurring in Polythalamia, and
in particular to illustrate their frequent assemblage in families,
or Polyparies, as they are termed. Plate I. contains simple
forms; Plates II. and III. composite or family forms, Poly-
paries; of which Plate II. contains family forms assembled in
single rows, and Plate ITI. family forms arranged in many rows.
If, as already observed, we examine a wall or paper whitened
with finely levigated chalk, or a glazed visiting-card not coated
with white lead alone, but also with chalk, they would appear,
when magnified 300 times, more or less rich in subjects, as
represented in Plate IV.
Plate I. contains simple recent Polythalamia from the sea-
sand of Rimini. Fig. 1. Rotalia Beccarii; the shell only was
known, but the figures show also the form of the animal when
deprived of its shell by an acid, the form of both being the
same. Fig. 2. Marginulina Raphanus (Nodosaria Raphanus,
Nautilus diaphanus priorum), also very common at Rimini
and other Italian coasts, and which had hitherto been errone-
ously ranked with Orthocera.
Plate II. contains Polyparies of recent Polythalamia assem-
* These plates do not accompany Mr. Weaver’s paper.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 309
dled in single rows, from the Red Sea and the Mediterranean.
The two subjects represented in this Plate were collected by
me in the year 1823, and it is peculiarly interesting, through
my newly-discovered method of observing*, to have been
able to see in several divisions of the internal body the
remains of the siliceous Infusoria, of which they had made a
repast fifteen years before. Fig. 1. Peneroplis planatus, d Or-
bigny, Nautilus planatus of Fichtel and Moll, from the Red
Sea. The shells of this animalcule were hitherto only known,
but the soft organic animal form which they inclose is liere also
represented. Fig. 2. Coscinospira Hemprichiz, a form from
the Red Sea, also found in the Libyan part of the Mediter-
ranean, and which was formerly erroneously placed adjoining
the Spzrula of the Cephalopods, and more recently as con-
nected, through Lituolites nautiloides, with Spirolina.
Plate II]. contains Polyparies of recent Polythalamia assem-
bled in many rows. ‘This Plate contains the only living ani-
malcule of the Polythalamia group, hitherto so far observed
as to admit of its classification. The three forms given in
this Plate, constructed of raany rows of animalcules, may be
distinctly associated with the Flustra and Eschara of the
Bryozoa, to which, through the well-known Zunulites and
Orbitulites (hitherto ranked with coral animals), they approxi-
mate in a convincing manner. Fig. 1. Orbiculus numismalis,
from the sea-sand of the Antilles Isles. Fig. 2. Sorites or-
Siculus = Nautilus orbiculus, Forskal, Nummulina (Assilina)
nitida, dOrbigny,? from the Red Sea. The same species
lives also in the Mediterranean. In a part magnified 300
times we see the animalcule with eight feelers protruding from
its cell. In some of the cells may be seen distinct shells of
siliceous Infusoria; in others appear oviform globules. Fig. 3.
Amphisorus Hemprichii closely resembles the Sorites; but it
has cells on both sides bearing single animalcules, and hence
* The new method of observing is the following :—Place a drop of water
upon a lamina of mica, and put into it of scraped chalk as much as will
cover the fine point of a knife, spreading it out and leaving it to rest a few
seconds; then withdraw the finest particles which are suspended in the
water, together with most of the water, and let the remainder become per-
fectly dry. Cover this remainder so spread out with Canadian balsam, the
turpentine of the Pinus (Abies) balsamea, and hold it over a lamp until it
becomes slightly fluid without froth. A preparation thus made seldom
fails, and when magnified 300 times in diameter we see that the mass cf
the chalk is chiefly composed of minute well-preserved organisms. In this
preparation all the cells of the Polythalamia appear at first black with a
white central spot, which is caused by the air contained in the cells, which,
as is well known, appear under water as annular black bodies; but by de-
grees the balsam penetrates into all the single cells, the black rings of the
air vesicles disappear, and we recognize all the small cells of the Polytha-
lamian animals, often presenting a very pretty appearance.
310 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
the dises are twice as thick as in Sorites. If we compare So-
rites with Flustra, we may place Amphisorus by the side of
Eschara, but, being both free moving bodies, they are different
from them.
Plate IV. contains the znvisible animalcules of the chalk
and chalk marl, displayed in twelve specimens of rock; 1 to 9
being portions from the chalk, and 10 to 12 from the chalk
marl, magnified 300 times. In these specimens the calcare-
ous Polythalamia amount to sixteen species, and the siliceous
Infusoria to twelve species, with siliceous spicula of sponges.
The twelve localities from which these specimens of the rock
masses were derived are the following:— No. 1 to 5, writing
chalk; namely, 1. from Puszkary, in Poland, opposite Grod-
no, from the shore of the Memel; 2. from Jutland, in Den-
mark; 3. from the island of Rugen in Pomerania; 4. from
Gravesend, on the Thames; 5. from Meudon, near Paris;
Jjirmer writing chalk, No. 6, from Cattolica in Sicily; com-_
pact, not writing chalk, No. 7, from the Mokattum hills near
Cairo; and No. 8, from the Catacombs of Thebes in Upper
Egypt; compact gray limestone, No. 9, from the mountain
mass of Hamam Faraiin in Sinai, Arabia; chalk marl, No.
10, from Oran in Africa; No. 11, from Caltasinetta in Sicily ;
No. 12, from Greece.
In the general table indicated above, under the head of No.
13 of the contents of the memoir, a list is given of the princi-
pal forms of the invisible organic bodies which constitute
the rocks from which the twelve above-mentioned specimens
were taken, as well as the chalk of Brighton, the chalk marl
of Zante in the Ionian Islands, and the nummulite limestone
of the Pyramids of Geza in Egypt. From this it results that
the principal forms in these rocks consist of twenty-five spe-
cies of calcareous-shelled Polythalamia, thirty-nine species of
siliceous-shelled Infusoria, seven species of soft-shelled Infu-
soria of the flints, and five species of siliceous plants.
The twenty-five species of calcareous-shelled Polythalamia,
belonging to eight genera, are the following :—
Flustrella concentrica; Globigerina bulloides ?, G. helicina?;
Planulina sicula, P. *turgida; Robulina cretacea; Rosalina
*foveolata, R. globularis?, R. *levigata, R. pertusa; Rotalia
*olobulosa, R. ocellata, R. ornata, R. perforata, R. scabra,
R. stigma; Textularia aciculata?, T. *aspera, T. brevis, T.
*dilatuta, T. *globulosa, T. perforata, 'T. spinosa, 'T. *striata ;
Turbinulina ¢talica? Quinqueloculina? from Benisuef, is
doubtful. N.B. Textularia globulosa, when in fragments, is
not easily distinguished from Rofalia globulosa; and in like
manner the fragments of Textularia perforata may be con-
founded with Rotalia perforata.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 311
The thirty-nine species of siliceous-shelled Infusoria belong
to fourteen genera, and are as follow :—
Actinocyclus ternarius, A. *quaternarius, A. *quinarius, A.
senarius, A. septenarius, A. octonarius, A. denarius; Coccone-
ma Crete; Cornutella clathrata; Coscinodiscus Argus, C.
centralis, C. lineatus, C. *minor, C. *Patina; Denticella Fra-
gilaria, D. tridens; Dictyocha Fibula, D. Navicula, D. poly-
actis, D. speculum, D. stella, D. triangula; Eunotia zebra;
Fragilaria rhabdosoma, F. striolata?; Gallionella aurichalca ?,
G. sulcata; Haliomma Medusa, H. crenatum; Lithocampe
lineata, L. Radicula, L. solitaria; Navicula africana, N. Ba-
cillum, N. eurysoma, N. ventricosa, N. sicula; Pyxidicula
prisca; Synedra ulna.
The seven species of soft-shelled Infusoria of the flints be-
long to three genera, and are the following: —Chzetophyta
Pyrite; Peridinium pyrophorum+; Xanthidium bulbosum, X.
Surcatum, X. hirsutum, X. ramosum, X. tubiferum.
The five species of siliceous plants belong to two genera,
namely, Spongia (Tethya?) aciculosa, S. cancellata, 8. *Cri-
brum, S. binodis; Spongilla ( Tethya ?) lacustris}.
Of these principal forms the before-mentioned rocks partake
in the proportions as stated below: namely,
Species of Species of Infusoria. Species of
pouychalarnia: | Silicoaie omanenedthie spice
in Chalk, | in Flints.
The Chalk of H
Puszkary contains ......... 6 |
Riven eet -as oot nce ah 7 1
Mrblanel) hope acide dae: f6 cade 6
Gravesend. 2sass7ceses <2 0 6 3 5
Brichfert..235c.003s,.05--%> 7 ] 4
Ly PSP Pe A See er OG AL” bee 2,
RO ONG atest snp os, doses 9
The Chalk Marl of Siliceous Infusoria.
Caltasinetta ......... saree 7 C7 AREA ace 4
rarity taste anes e cane sesene 2 [fe NRPS he Se 1
WAANMEE 582s vals ds osioa vole ese 5 Sor aiig eect 2
(Ae oe ne acer aoe 3 EO as Boab 1
The Compact Chalk of
Byte see deale bens oa sioae 8 |
Je\rre | VE eke se anpoocoUbSeEUcOOne 6 |
The Nummulite Limestone o Containing 4 species of Num-
The Pyramids of Geza ... 6 ; mulite, the largest of wey
is one inch in diameter.
a eS ee =
+ Peridinium delitiense has hitherto been found only in flint pebbles
near Delitzsch, yet accompanied with forms that are common in the flints
of the chalk. ; : ; ey!
+ In the preceding lists, the species which are marked with an asterisk
are those which most frequently occur, forming the masses of the rocks.
The Rotalia globulosa occurs in all the localities.
312 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
On the Chalk Marl, and its relations to the Chalk and its
Flints.
The whole coast of Oran in Africa appears to belong to
the chalk formation, composing the plain east of the town,
and extending thence to the Atlas. The marl brought from
thence as tertiary by M. Rozet in great quantities I had an
opportunity of examining in Paris, and I found not only Po-
lirschiefer and an Infusoria conglomerate, but calcareous ani-
malcules of the same species as occur in the chalk of Poland,
Riigen, Denmark, and Paris, and which there mainly contri-
bute to its mass. It thus appeared that the so-called tertiary
formation of the coast of Barbary might, without much hazard,
be brought into a nearer connexion with the chalk. In his
description of this tract, M. Rozet states*, ‘* The tertiary
formation is extensively developed in Oran, forming the soil
of the large plain on the east of the town, and on the south
to the Atlas. It forms also the sea-coast to an extent of 3000
metres between Mers el Kebir and Cape Falcon, and the
whole soil of the adjacent plain. The lower bed is a blue
marl, like that which we found at Algiers and within the Atlas.
It appears destitute of organic remains. ‘The second or upper
deposit consists of marly and calcareous beds in alternation,
forming a thickness of 30 to 40 metres. In the plain these
beds are apparently horizontal, as well as in the elevated plain
of the Rammra hill; but in the hills south-west of the town
of Kasba they are, on an extent of two hours march, inclined
to the north, at an angle sometimes exceeding 30°. ‘The beds
of limestone are white and chalk-like, yellowish and coarse
granular, usually forming the lower part, succeeded by others
alternating with yellow marls, which are often slaty and
charged with sand, and between them are found layers of
ostreze and other shells. Among them two beds are distin-
guished, each one metre in thickness, composed of very white
finely-laminated marl, containing numerous well-preserved
impressions of fishes, so that in a cubic mass of one foot we
seldom fail to find three or four fishes. In these beds of marl
thus enclosing the fishes, other organic remains do not appear ;
but in the calcareous and sandy beds which intervene, occur
layers of large oysters mingled with gryphez. The upper
part of this deposit is composed of a calcareous breccia, which
is exhibited at the surface in the soil of the whole plain on
the south-west of Oran.”
This exact description of the position and thickness of the
white marl with impressions of fishes, has a reference to the
* Rozet, Voyage dans la Régence d Alger, Paris, 1833. tome 1. chap. v.
pp. 56, 63.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 313
Infusoria conglomerate of Oran, to which I have already ad-
verted. It is probably what formed the Tripel of the earlier
periods of Italy. When M. Rozet speaks (at p. 28-30) of
the great extent of the tertiary tract near Algiers as similar
in its relations to those of Oran, I cannot agree with him. On
the contrary, forming my judgment by the organic remains,
I consider the desert tract near Algiers as really composed of
a tertiary formation, which reposes on chalk. This opinion
is founded on my observation, that the tract in Libya, extend-
ing from Alexandria to Siwa, is composed of tertiary beds,
while from Cairo to Geza the chalk formation occurs, which
terminates at the granite of Syene, but is far spread into the
Desert. The valley of Siwa appears to form the northern
boundary of the chalk in Eastern Libya.
In the South of Italy, at Caltasinetta and its neighbourhood,
the relations had been correctly seized by our late friend
Frederick Hoffmann, from whose diary | have been favoured
with an extract by M. von Dechen. He represents the series
of strata which occupy the greater part of Sicily as composed
of limestones, sandstones, clays, and marls; the lower mem-
bers being probably referable to the Jura formation, suc-
ceeded by such as clearly belong to the chalk, and many beds
of which perfectly resemble the hard chalk of the north-west
of Germany (Teutoburger Wald). Among the marls are
white chalk-like thinly laminated masses, analogous to Tri-
pel, designated by Hoffmann as white chalk marl, and which
especially occur in the southern part of the island. ‘The beds
of the chalk formation usually dip Z0° to 30°, while the strike
is nearly constant, from 15° to 45° S. of E. and N. of W.,
parallel to the south coast. ‘The tertiary beds which succeed
the chalk are composed of loose sand, friable sandstone, tes-
taceous breccias, clays and limestones. ‘They cover the chalk
unconformably, resting on the truncated edges of the latter.
The chalk beds are upon the whole poor in organic remains,
and these are seldom distinct; there occur Hippurites, Num-
mulites, Lenticulites, and in a few piaces indistinct Ammo-
nites and Belemnites, while the tertiary beds are quite filled
with innumerable Mollusks, of which nine-tenths are still li-
ving in the Mediterranean. ‘This distinction is so striking that
it scarcely required the difference of relative position in order
to draw a correct line between the two formations. Even had
so circumspect a geologist as Frederick Hoffmann not cor-
rectly seized and pronounced with decision on these local
relations, the numerous microscopic siliceous Infusoria with
calcareous Polythalamia which [ have found in the chalk
mar! would have led to the same conclusion.
314 Ehrenberg on the Organic Composition of Chalk.
If we compare Hoffmann’s description of this portion of
Sicily with that given by Rozet of the coast near Oran, we
cannot avoid recognizing a similarity of relations; and the
thinly laminated marly beds with impressions of fishes,
between Caltasinetta and Castrogiovanni, which Hoffmann
refers with certainty to the chalk formation, correspond to the
similar beds which occur near Oran, but which were said to
be tertiary. And the parallel is confirmed by the micro-
scopic siliceous Infusoria and calcareous animalcules which I
have discovered in both.
The genera and species of the siliceous Infusoria in Sicily
are so similar to those of Oran and Zante, that of thirty-six
species, four occur in all the three countries, three in Cal-
tasinetta and Zante, seven in Caltasinetta and Oran, while in
all of them the Coscinodiscus Patina is greatly predominant.
Of all these siliceous animals, not a single species has been
found in the chalk of the North of Europe, nor even in the
flints. On the other hand, the calcareous-shelled animalcules,
which in the South of Europe accompany the siliceous ani-
mals, comprise about one half of the same species that are
found in the North, yet exceeding them in quantity.
From the examination of the organic constituents of the
chalk marl we learn the hitherto unknown fact, that nume-
rous swarms of microscopic Infusoria were in existence within
the period of the secondary formation of the earth’s surface,
chiefly belonging to such as possess siliceous cases or shells,
and which for the greater part are members of such sections
of the Bacillaria family as had previously appeared to be con-
fined to the tertiary or newest formations.
Of the thirty-nine or forty species of siliceous Infusoria
occurring in the chalk formation, thirty-four or thirty-five
have not hitherto been found in the recent state; but it is re-
markable that the remaining five or six species so closely
resemble existing species of the present day, that they present
no peculiar character by which they could be distinguished
from them, and hence the application of new names appeared
inadmissible. They are, Eunotia zebra, Fragilaria rhab-
dosoma, F. striolata ?, Gallionella aurichalca, Navicula ventri-
cosa, Synedra ulna*.
In the chalk itself only four out of the thirty-nine or forty
* The indifference shown to climate by Infusoria, and the peculiarity of —
their organic development, seem to render it possible that they might be
more readily preserved through many catastrophes of the earth than other
forms. By the faculty which they possess of spontaneous division, a single
individual can, under very favourable circumstances, be multiplied in the
course of a few hours to the extent of millions.
Mr. A. White’s Description of a South American Wasp. 315
species of siliceous Infusoria have hitherto been met with,
namely, Fragilaria rhabdosoma, Fragilaria striolata ?, Gallio-
nella aurichalca, and Pyxidicula prisca, They are very rare,
and found only in the vicinity of the beds of flint.
[To be continued. ]
XXXVI.—Description of a South American Wasp which col-
lects Honey. By Mr. ApAm Wuires, M.E.S.; an Assistant
in the Zoological Department of the British Museum.
[With a Plate. ]
Some of the Wasp tribe of the New World form their nests of
a solid and rather thick pasteboard. Such structures have
been met with in Pennsylvania*, while they occur frequently
in the more tropical parts of South America as far as Buenos
Ayrest, and very probably much to the south of that point:
in the description of the Isthmus of Darien t, Wafer mentions
“the bird’s nest bee, the hives of which are black and hard,
hanging from the trees like birds’ nests.”
The best known is that of the Chartergus nidulans §, which
is formed “ofa beautifully polished white and solid pasteboard,
impenetrable by the weather||.”” It has been fully described
by Reaumur in the sixth volume of his ‘ Mémoires’: in the
British Museum there are two specimens of this nest. They
are securely attached to the branch of a tree by their upper end,
and vary much in length, from a few inches, as in the Museum
specimens, to two feet or evenmore. In the former case they
are more or less round and have but four or five combs, while
in the latter they are of a long cylindrical shape, and have a
* Rymsdyk, Mus. Britannicum, tab. 1. f. 2.
+ Mr. Cuming tells me he has seen specimens there, at least four feet
long: in a deserted one a swallow had built her nest.
t Voyage and Description of the Isthmus of America (1704), p. 214.
§ The Vespa nidulans, Fab., is figured by Coquebert (Ill. Icon. tab. 6.
fiz. 3.), and Guerin (Iconogr. pl. 72. fig. 7.). In Saint Fargeau’s ‘ Hist. Nat.
des Hymenopt.’ i. p. 546, it constitutes, along with another black species,
the genus Chartergus ; I believe it is the type of Latreille’s Epipone. Cuvier
(Bull. des Sc.) seems to have first pointed out, in 1797, the error into which
Reaumur fell, of considering a Chalcididous parasite found in these nests as
being the constructors of them, He regarded it as the Chalcis annulata of
Fabricius, an insect found in the pupe of nocturnal Lepidoptera. In 1798
Fabricius described the insect as Chalcis conica (Suppl. Ent. Syst. 242),
having obtained specimens from the nest : the name he afterwards altered to
pyramidea (Syst. Piez. 167), as his former specific name was pre-occupied.
Mr. Sells has recently found the parasite in the nest (Journal of the Pro-
ceedings of Entomol. Society, ii. p. 30), and Mr. Westwood has published a
more accurate figure than that given by Reaumur (Ent. Soc. Trans., ii.
pl. 20. f. 6.).
|| Kirby and Spence, Introd. 1. p. 506,
316 Mr. A. White’s Description of a
corresponding number of partitions ; additional combs are
added to the lower part as the occupants increase in number.
These combs are horizontal, convex on the under side, and
fixed to the walls of the nest by their whole circumference.
The cells are hexagonal and open downwards, as in most
other nests constructed by the Vespide. Each of the combs
has a hole near the middle, through which access is obtained
to the uppermost apartments. The outer entrance is by a
small round orifice near the middle of the under side, which
is more or less funnel-shaped.
In the Museum there is a nest from the West Indies of a
greyish brown colour; it is bell-shaped, and attached to the
branch of a tree in the same way as the other. The base,
however, is flat, the entrance being by a small hole close to
the edge: each stage of combs has a similarly situated orifice
to give’ access to the variovs compartments. There are five
straight horizontal partitions, fixed, as in the preceding, by
their entire circumference; on the lowest there are no indica-
tions of cells, on the fourth there 1s a circular cell unfinished,
while in the three upper combs the hexagonal cells are con-
fined to the middle. The texture of this nest is coarse, the
fibres on the surface and throughout being distinctly visible.
It is seven and a half inches long, the base where its diameter
is greatest having nearly the same dimensions.
This nest closely agrees with one from Cayenne figured
by Cuvier*; the constructor is a small Vespidous insect of
a shining black colour, with brown wings and a pedicellate
abdomen, which the French naturalist has named- Vespa
Tatuat, from its local name “La Mouche Tatou.” Bur-
meister} says this insect forms a nest, having “ the superior
surface covered with a multitude of conical knobs ;” in Cu-
vier’s figure it is perfectly smooth.
The insects which form these curious habitations have been
observed by Lacordaire§ in their native country. Their so-
cieties are not dissolved each year, as happens with the wasps
of our climates, which, on the approach of cold weather, are
nearly all cut off.
The nests are found in copse-wood, principally near plan-
tations (at least in Guiana), and are generally suspended at a
height of three or four feet from the ground. During the
rainy season, from January to the middle of June, only perfect
* Bull. des Se. par la Soc. Phil., n. 8.
+ The Polistes morio of Fabricius, who describes the nest from Cuvier’s
communication. It is the Lpipona Tatua of Saint Fargeau.
+ Man. of Ent., transl. by Shuckard, § 296. p. 523.
§ Introd. a1’Entom., ii. p. 508.
South American Wasp which collects Honey. 317
nests are to be met with; in January and February the cells
are in great measure filled with larvae; in March and April
these decrease in number, and by the end of May scarcely
any are to be found. These are thought to turn into females,
which, not finding room in their old nursery, emigrate and
form new colonies, as when the fine season returns, which is
about the middle of June, nests are to be found in progress ;
but instead of only one female being at work, as is the case
with our wasps, Lacordaire has observed as many as a dozen
busily engaged in constructing their new abode. As soon as
a series of cells is completed larvee may be found in them, and
the nest is gradually increased by the addition of new combs.
In September the structure is half finished, and towards the
end of November it is most frequently completed. The old
nests of the preceding year continue peopled as before, but
new larvee were only observed in them in abundance in Sep-
tember or October ; these are believed to turn into neuters: if
this is the case, the reverse takes place with the European
wasps, the neuters of which are first excluded.
Mr. Walter Hawkins has presented to the collection of the
British Museum a pasteboard nest from the banks of the Rio
Yancay (Uruguay.?), which differs very materially from both
the structures I have alluded to above. It seems to be of the
same description as the fabric referred to by Burmeister,—by
Westwood* as existing in the Berlin Museum, and appears
to me to be identical with the nest of the “ Chiguana” wasp
referred to by Azarat.
As the accompanying figs., 1 and 2, drawn by Mr. Dinkel,
give its shape and general appearance better than any de-
scription could do, it is only necessary to say, that, viewed
sideways, it is of an oblong form, rounded at the base. The
orifices at the side, near the bottom, bulge out considerably.
When viewed from beneath it is somewhat ovate. It is
very generally covered with conical knobs of various shapes,
nearly all of which are more or less rubbed at the end, but in
some places, less exposed, they are pointed, and in many in-
stances nearly three-quarters of an inch long. At the very
top, and on the side above the entrance, there are but few of
these projections; in two or three places the surface is very
distinctly contracted, and in the concavities there are no pro-
jecting points; the knobs seem to run in irregular, generally
transverse, ridges.
The entrances, as may be seen in fig. 2, are artfully protected
by pent roofs from the weather, which, in the rainy season, is
* Introd. to Mod. Classif., ii. p. 251.
+ Voyages dans l’Amér. Mérid., i. p. 171.
318 Mr. A. White’s Description of a
sometimes very violent ; they are also so intricately twisted,
as to prevent the ingress of any moth or other enemy, at least
of any size. The hardness of the whole mass must tend very
much to protect its constructor from the attacks of insect or
honey-seeking animals; and the natives, with some degree of
probability, believe, that feline and other animals are deterred
from taking the nest by the pointed knobs with which it is
covered ; Mr. Hawkins’s correspondent in Buenos Ayres as-
sured him of this.
The substance is hard, the texture close, and, when seen
with a slight magnifying power, seems curiously matted*.
The natives say that it is principally formed of the dried dung
of the “ Capincha,” which, from the description, would appear
to be some sort of Water Cavy.
On making a longitudinal section of this singular insect-
structure down the middle, I found there were fourteen combs
in it, exclusively of a globular mass at the top, seemingly the
nucleus of the nest; this is nearly encircled by the two nearest
combs. The other twelve are arranged beneath these, the up-
permost most nearly approaching a circle in their arrangement
as they approximate to the mass at the top. The different
“ stories” of combs are attached to the common wall of the
nest; the entrances to the various compartments are at the
sides, a small irregular-shaped space being left between the
comb and the outer envelope in various parts of it. Ad/ the
combs are covered to the very edge by the cells, except the
parts of them that are immediately close to the orifices of the
nest, where, if they existed, they would impede the entrance
and exit of the inhabitants. The uppermost combs are
thickest, being throughout from seven to five lines in thick-
ness, whilst the lower are not half that depth. ‘The cells are
small, hexagonal, and, as in other wasps’ nests, have the open-
ing downwards; they are formed of a light papery substance,
similar in colour to the outer covering. This, as might be
expected, is thickest at the top, where, internally, from the
meeting of several combs, it is rather loose ; at the base it is
thinnest. The knobs are solid throughout, and, like the ex-
ternal envelope from which they arise, are formed of nume-
rous layers of “ paper” so closely blended as to be hardly di-
* The structure of paper and pasteboard, as made by insects, would form
an interesting subject of investigation. In several specimens which I have
had an opportunity of examining under a powerful microscope, there seem
to exist great differences, some consisting of particles of wood or other ve-
getable substances, simply agglutinated ; while in others these particles ap-
pear to have undergone a change within the body of the insect or some other
animal, and to have lost all traces of their vegetable origin; others again,
as in the present instance, seem to combine both.
South American Wasp which collects Honey. 319
stinguishable: the solid wall of the nest at top is about a quarter
of an inch in thickness. The nest is nearly sixteen inches
long: the broadest part, which is on the same line with the
orifices, is more than a foot long ; the narrowest point is nine
or ten inches. At the base, an imaginary straight line, drawn
from the orifices to the opposite side, would be nearly a foot
long. It would seem as if the nest was complete ; indeed, un-
less the insects had the power of redissolving the matter at
the base, or the inclination to gnaw it off, I cannot see how
they could make additions to it.
Many of the uppermost combs have the cells, in the middle,
filled with a brownish red honey, which, in its present state,
possesses scarcely any smell or taste. The occurrence of
honey in the combs is interesting, inasmuch as it still further
confirms the accuracy of Azara’s observation, and is made
by a Vespidous insect having the first joint of the abdomen
elongated into a pedicel.
Azara, in the account of his residence in various parts of
South America, mentioned the fact of several wasps of these
countries collecting honey. The Baron Walckenaer, who
edited the French translation of this work, published in 1809*,
thought that the Spanish traveller, who was unskilled in en-
tomoiogy, had made some mistake with regard to the insects,
and regarded the so-called wasps as belonging to some Jee of
the genus, of which the Apis amalthea is the type (Melipona.)
Latreille also believed that they must be referred to the ge-
nera Melipona or Trigona, insects which, in South America,
take the place of our honey-bee. These authors were after-
wards clearly convinced of the correctness of Azara’s observa-
tions, by the circumstance of M. Auguste de St. Hilaire+ find-
ing near the river Uruguay, an oval grey-coloured nest of a
papery consistence, like that of the European wasps, suspended
from the branches of a small shrub about a foot from the
ground. He and two other attendants partook of some honey,
and found it of an agreeable sweetness, free from the phar-
maceutic taste which so frequently accompanies European
honey. He gives a detailed account of its poisonous effects
on himself and his two men, in the paper referred to.
366 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of lrish Zoophytes.
believe, been fully understood : it is nothing more than feecal matter
kept in constant rotation by the action of the cilia lining the whole
internal surface of the alimentary canal, and which, by their pecu-
liar arrangement, drive it on towards the place by which it is to
make its exit—thus supplying the office of proper propelling mus-
cles. ‘The polypi are usually non-symmetrical, one side being more
bulged out than the other, but they are capable of assuming various
other forms and appearances. The tentacula, too, vary much in
their disposition, being sometimes directed either outwards or up-
wards ; at others they are curved inwards, usually to a small ex-
tent, but occasionally so much so as to be entirely lost to view,
being concealed by the outer tunic of the polypus. ‘The motions
of the polypi of this species are very lively and peculiar. All the
Ascidian zoophytes are much more vivacious and active in their
movements than the Hydroid, and this is the necessary result of
their higher organization. ‘The stems, though commonly still,
have free power of motion; and when one is disturbed it bends
quickly to and fro, so as to strike one or two more ; these again
strike upon others, and thus for a few seconds all are in action; but
they soon return to quietness, and the arms, which during the com-
motion had been doubled up, open again.’’—Lister.
I much regret that I was unable, from want of time, to carry my
observations further on the anatomy of this species, so well adapted,
both from its size and the circumstance of its being the only known
naked Ascidian zoophyte, for anatomical examination. I have sent
a more perfect figure than has yet been given of this species to Dr.
Johnston.
On Vesicularia spinosa: very rare: Dublin Bay.
Crisia aculeata. Milne Edwards has figured this species, which
I described in the ‘ Annals of Natural History’ for November J 840,
in the ‘ Annales des Sciences Naturelles’ for April 1838, under the
name of La Crisie ivoire. How Milne Edwards could have con-
founded this somewhat rare species with the common one C. eburnea,
I am at a loss to conceive. Upon this latter species in no case have
I ever met with spines; and had they ever existed, traces of them
would have been visible on the sides of the cells, as they always
are in C. aculeata, even when the teeth themselves have been broken
off.
Rarely found on stones, east of Kingstown harbour.
Hippothoa lanceolata. See Plate VIII. fig. 5, 6, for a representa-
tion of this elegant species.
Trawled up off Bray on old valves of Pecten communis.
Anguinaria spatulata. On stones east of Kingstown harbour,
abundant; also at the Giant’s Causeway, on Fuci.
Tubulipora verrucaria, Milue Edwards. This species in its per-
fect state, as it occurs in Dublin Bay, resembles in outline a penta-
petalous flower, being slightly five-lobed. This peculiarity has not, I
believe, been noticed. Some time since, not knowing that it had been
described, I gave it the name of Tubulipora floriformis, to express
this peculiarity of form. ‘lo Mr. 'Thompson of Belfast the credit of
the discovery of this as a native zoophyte is due, a fact of which I
Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophyies. 367
was ignorant when I published a former paper on Irish zoophytes.
Mr. Thompson has also been the fortunate discoverer of one or two
other undescribed and beautiful species of Tubuliporide.
Monkstown, Dublin Bay, on the frond of Laminaria digitata :
not common.
T. lobulata? Polypidom six-lobed ; cells irregular, united.—A.
H. H. Polypidom divided into six lobes of unequal size; tubes
joined, of irregular form and size. See Plate X. fig. 1, 2. Of
the above Tubulipora I have met with but a single specimen; its
appearance and development however is so different from any
hitherto described, that I conceive myself justified in considering it
to be a distinct species.
Cellepora ramulosa. Not common: obtained by trawling off
Howth.
C. bimucronaia. Cells ovate, disposed in a single layer; aper-
tures circular, with a slight excavation below, armed on each side
with a short strong process.—A.H.H. A species of Cellepora is
described by Lamarck under the name of Cellepora bimucronata, and
which I conceive to be identical with that defined above. Although
I am inclined to consider this as a distinct species, I yet do not feel
assured that it is really so; if not, it is to be regarded as C. pu-
micosa in the first stage of its formation. See Plate IX. fig. 1.
Berenicea hyalina. On the roots of Laminaria digitata, Bray
Head: not uncommon.
Lepralia nitida. Lepralia costata or thoraciformis would not be
an inappropriate name for this curious species, resembling, as each
cell so accurately does, a miniature human thorax ; the cross pieces
representing the ribs, and the broad band into which these are in-
serted being analogous to a sternum. A distinct spine is frequently
to be observed on each side of the lower angle of the mouth of the
cell.
On stones east of Kingstown harbour : rare.
L. coccinea. On stones below low-water mark, east side of
Kingstown harbour: common.
L. variolosa. On a bivalve, Sea Point : rare.
L. ciliata. ‘ Cells ovate-globose, frosted; the aperture con-
tracted, circular, armed with from five to seven long spines.”
The lower border of the mouth of each cell is prolonged into a
spout-like process, beneath which, in perfect specimens, a pointed
tooth, somewhat shorter than those surrounding the aperture, is
visible. See Plate IX. fig. 2.
Rather abundant on stones, shells, and fuci, Dublin Bay.
The following species of Lepralia have never, I believe, been de-
scribed as British zoophytes ; whether they are altogether new I
cannot say. I have not, however, been able to identify them with
certainty with any hitherto described, although I have consulted
numerous works with this view ; among others, Delle Chiaje’s ‘ Anim.
senza Vert. di Napoli,’ in which many Lepralie are figured.
LL. appensa. Cells somewhat raised anteriorly, frosted, larger
above than below ; aperture quadrangular, surrounded by four or fivé
368 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes.
long slender spines of nearly equal lengths; the lateral walls of each
cell are prolonged into large, triangular, winged appendages, which
are hollow, and communicate with the interior of the cells. See
Plate IX. fig. 3. These appendages are always present.—A. H. H.
The front wall of each cell rises into the mouth in the form of a
strong pointed process.
L. pedilostoma. Crust spreading irregularly ; walls of the cells
reticulated; aperture calceoliform ; margin plain, everted—A. H. H.
The crust of this species in a recent state is always of a red co-
lour. The cells are but little raised, and are closely approximated
to each other. Their divisions and arrangement are often rendered
unequal and irregular by the rough surface on which they are de-
veloped, being usually found in the crevices of rocks and on stones.
See Plate IX. fig. 4.
Blackrock and Portmarnock: not uncommon. I have also found
specimens of this species adhering to the bottom of an old hulk, the
Olbers, in Plymouth Sound.
L. insignis. Cells raised, ventricose; aperture armed with from
five to seven spines. A long spinous process rises out of the cell,
Jow down and to one side.—A. H. H.
This singular species is readily distinguished from all others by
the position of a sharp spine or tooth, which proceeds, not from near
the aperture, but low down, from the side of the cell, m the wall
of which a hole is visible if one of the spines be broken off. The
aperture of the cells describes 7ths of a circle, the lower part being
straight. In addition to the spines which surround the aperture,
and which gradually diminish in length on each side, a short pro-
cess rises from the front of the cell, just below the aperture. See
Plate IX. fig. 5.
Dublin Bay.
L. cylindrica. Crust opaque; cells cylindrical; aperture circular,
plain, slightly contracted: a single broad triangular tooth rises from
the anterior wall of the cell just below its aperture —A. H. H.
This species bears a considerable resemblance to Berenicea hyalina,
from which, however, it is estranged by the opacity of the crust as
well as by the presence of the tooth. There is a neck or collar
joined to the aperture in B. hyalina not present in this. See Plate
IX. fig. 6.
A single specimen on the root of Laminaria digitata, Dublin
Bay.
L. punctata. Cells oval, not much raised; apertures subqua-
drangular, having the lower lip thickened and somewhat everted.
On each side of the opening of the cell a small triangular process is
seen, and from the upper margin of the aperture three or four short
teeth arise. The walls of the cells are perforated with small holes,
which give them a dotted appearance ; this is an invariable charac-
ter of the species. See Plate IX. fig.7.—A.H. H.
On stones, east of Kingstown harbour.
L. linearis. Cells much depressed, radiating in lines from a
centre, and increasing in size towards the edge of the crust, upper
Mr, A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 369
part rounded; aperture contracted, circular, with a minute spout-
like elongation below; teeth either three or four, surrounding the
upper half of the aperture; on either side of the small spout-like
elongation referred to, a short blunt process is visible. See Plate
IX. fig. 8.—A. H. H.
On stones east of Kingstown harbour, and at the Giant's Cause-
way : not common.
Membranipora stellata, Thompson. A species has been described
by Mr. Thompson in the ‘Annals of Natural History’ for April
1840, p. 101, under the name of Flustra or Membdbranipora stellata.
This supposed species I have ascertained to be merely Membranipora
pilosa, with the bristle abortive, on an expanded surface. I wrote
to Mr. Thompson upon the subject, at the same time forwarding
specimens for examination, and that gentleman’s reply was con-
firmatory of my opinion. Mr. Thompson was, I believe, the first
who described M. pilosa to assume the sfedlate form, and to have
the cells disposed in the manner indicated in the description of M.
stellata.
Flustra truncata.—Giant’s Causeway, abundant; but not found
upon the coast of Dublin.
F. avicularis. ‘This species in a recent state is of a reddish
colour, but becomes of a grayish black in drying; this change of
colour in drying is, I believe, peculiar to this species, and the cause
of it 1am not acquainted with. I have sometimes observed the
bird’s-head appendages (whose motions are so very peculiar and un-
accountable) described as belonging to C. avicularia, on this species.
I now find that this species is very abundant in Dublin Bay.
F. lineata. Not uncommon on Patella cerulea: Bray.
F. tuberculata, Not common: Merrion, Dublin Bay.
F. disians. Polypidom encrusting, grayish, calcareous, reticu-
lated ; cells oval; margin broad, having its inner edge slightly cre-
nulated; two short processes are visible at each upper angle of the
cells.
I am informed by Dr. Johnston that this species was discovered
some years ago by Mr. Bean, but that the habitat of his specimen
was unknown. It is on this account, I imagine, that no descrip-
tion of it has as yet been givenin Dr. Johnston’s ‘British Zoophytes.’
Dr. Johnston, in a recent letter to me, remarks, ‘‘ yours is the only
native specimen J have seen.” From a comparison of specimens of
this with Flusira tuberculata, I cannot help suspecting that they are
in fact one and the same species. When at Belfast a short time
since, I saw several fine specimens of this species in Mr. Thomp-
son’s cabinet, obtained some time since upon the coasts of Down
and Antrim.
On stones east of Kingstown harbour: not common.
F. carnosa. ‘This species, which is undoubtedly no Flustra, ought
to be raised to a generic rank and placed in the family Alcyonidule.
Pallas asserts (I quote from memory) that the tentacula vary from
18 to 30: this assertion I am not able to verify, having constantly
Ann. §& Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2B
370 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes.
found tae number of tentacula in each polype to be the same, viz.
30.
Dublin Bay : abundant on Fucus siliquosus.
F. Hibernica. 1 have now ascertained that this species, which I
described in my Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes published in the
« Annals’ for November 1840, is not a Flustra but a Lepralia, which
I have again figured and described in this paper under the head of
L. pedilostoma. ‘The figure given with the Catalogue represents a
posterior view of the cells, the wall of each cell posteriorly being
absent. The error of figuring the cells posteriorly instead of ante-
riorly, and the absence of the posterior wall, are thus accounted
for. The specimen from which the figure was taken adhered to an
Ascidia; this Ascidia grew on the under surface of a rock, in re-
moving which, the Lepralia, which covered the rock before the As-
cidia, also came away,—the mouths of the cells adhering to it, and
the wall still remaining attached to the rock. The detection of an
error of this nature is almost as pleasing as the discovery of a new
species.
Cellularia avicularia. ‘This species 1 now find to be abundant in
the Bay of Dublin and about the neighbouring coast.
Alcyonidium gelatinosum. Occurs in long rope-like masses, and is
rarely obtained except by trawling. Rare, off Howth and Lambay.
A. hirsutum. ‘The polypidom of this species in its young state is
clavate, and not branched. As in this condition it might, possibly,
be mistaken for a distinct species, I have given two figures of it, one
representing it of its natural size; the other is a magnified view of
it, with many of the polypi protruded. When under the microscope
it presented a very beautiful appearance, some faint idea of which
the drawing, Plate X. fig. 3, 4., is intended to convey.
A. parasiticum. Polypidom encrusting, spongy ; cells polygonal,
but irregular in size and arrangement. Polypes with sixteen ten-
tacula.
The nature of this production, which has long been involved in
obscurity, I have at last succeeded in determining. By very many
it was not considered to be a zoophyte at all; I have, however, as-
certained, beyond all doubt, that it is a true polypiferous production
of the genus Alcyonidium. Dr. Johnston describes the polypidom
as ‘‘ entirely composed of particles of sand cemented together with
mud or clay.”” Were this really its character, this fact alone would
be sufficient to decide that it could not be a zoophyte; for the po-
lypidoms of all true zoophytes are growths, and not artificial for-
mations. Numerous sandy particles are certainly found in con-
nexion with it, but not, in my opinion, incorporated with it; their
presence, I believe, being confined to cells vacant by the death of
the polypi. If previously dried, and then dropped into water, it im-
mediately sinks to the bottom, and does not remain there wholly
unaltered, but slowly absorbs a portion of the fluid until it has at-
tained its original dimensions. I also believe that I have detected
a few siliceous spicule, and certainly numerous siliceous granules,
ee Se ae
Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 371
which are to be distinguished from the particles of sand by their
much smaller size. In a recent state a membrane is attached to
the edges of each cell; this rises up in a globular form, and bears a
near resemblance to the papille on 4. hirsutum. ‘The polypi cor-
respond so closely with those of the other species of Alcyonidium,
that I have thought it superfluous to give a separate figure of it,
having the same number of tentacula, viz. 16.
Encrusting various flexible corallines, Dublin Bay : common.
A. echinatum. It is not a little remarkable, that the polypi of
this common species should have remained hitherto undescribed. I
was lately so fortunate as to meet with some specimens in which I
had an opportunity of examining the animals in a living condition.
The result cf this examination proves, that it is not only not allied
to the family with which it has up to this time been classed, but
that it is a true Hydra zoophyte, related closely to Coryne squamata,
between which and Hermia glandulosa it forms a new and distinct
genus. This new genus it was my wish to have dedicated to Dr.
Johnston, the author of the work cn British Zoophytes, in acknow-
ledgment of the valuable services rendered by that gentleman to
this interesting department of natural science. In this desire I have,
however, been disappointed, from the circumstance of a genus in
botany having been dedicated to Dr. Johnston, the editor of Girard’s
* Herbal.’
The generic name which I have adopted was suggested to me by
my friend G. J. Allman, Esq.
The following are the characters of the genus
Ecurtnocuorium, Hassall.
Polypidom encrusting ; surface raised into numerous rough papille ;
polypi hydroid, naked, pedicellated.—A. H. H.
Echinochorium clavigerum. Polypidom muricated with rough
spinous papillz about a line in height. Polypi more or Jess clavate,
not retractile within cells ; tentacula claviform, about 4rd the length
of the body, retractile.
There are numerous indentations on the surface of the polypidom,
in each of which the base of a polype is inserted ; this latter is about
4th of an inch in height and is of a white colour; its head is some-
what enlarged, and is surrounded with numerous contractile club-
shaped tentacula ; the number of these varies considerably, but fre-
quently amounts to between twenty and thirty. The tentacula ure
not arranged in any determinate order, as they always are in the
Ascidian type of zoophytes, but are variously disposed. This ob-
servation applies to all Hydroid zoophytes. Whether the polypes
are separate or united at their bases, | am unable to say. See Plate
X. fig. 5., which is a magnified representation of this genus and
species. This species does, I believe, possess a stomach, which in
one of the polypi in the figure is seen to be everted. Fig. 5, 0b.
Dublin Bay and Portmarnock : common.
A marked correspondence exists between the natural his-
tory of the coast of Antrim and the opposed shore of Scot-
2B 2
_
372 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes.
land; and the relation is particularly obvious in the distribu-
tion of zoophytes, three species of which, common in the
North of England and on the Scottish shore, being also pre-
sent on it, and not, I believe, found upon any other part of
the coast of Ireland. Thus Thoa muricata (never before re-
corded as Irish), Sertularia filicula and Flustra truncata, all
more or less extensively distributed upon the English and
Scotch coasts, are occasionally met with on the Antrim coast,
in the neighbourhood of that wonder of the world, the Giant’s
Causeway. Ireland, therefore, it may fairly be inferred, is
indebted to Scotland for the presence of at least three species
of zoophytes, and probably for some others. I think I may
venture to predict that Thuiaria thuja will eventually be
found on the coast of Antrim. I now find that only one
species of Plumularia is wanting in the Bay of Dublin, and
that is P. pennatula.
To the title of my Catalogue an objection has been raised
by Mr. Thompson of Belfast, on the ground that it does not
embrace the whole coast of Ireland, but is confined to a par-
ticular portion of it. The justice of this observation, as ori-
ginally applied to that portion of the Catalogue which has
already been published, I willingly admit. It should rather
have been entitled a ‘ Catalogue of the Zoophytes of Dublin
and its vicinity ;’ this title, however, would not be equally
applicable to the continuation of the Catalogue, as to some
species I have given a second locality.
I wish it to be distinctly understood, that the Catalogue
which has been already published, as well as this Supplement,
contain only the results of my own personal observation and
research. I have, therefore, not deemed it necessary to ad-
vert to the writings of other Irish naturalists on this branch
of natural history, not having had occasion to refer to them.
I may, however, mention, that a catalogue of Irish zoophytes
was published by Mr. Templeton, of Belfast, some years ago ;
that many of Ellis’s specimens were obtained on the Irish
coast; and that a list of unrecorded species was published
by Mr. ‘Thompson in the ‘Annals of Natural History’ for
June 1840, at which time my Catalogue was with Mr. Taylor,
the editor, for publication. JI must not omit to notice also,
that many rare species of zoophytes were procured by Mr.
R. Ball and Miss Ball of Dublin, at Youghal, county of
Cork.
I have now brought the enumeration and description of
the species to a conclusion. During the compilation of this
Supplement I have had occasion to make various references
to Dr. Johnston, who has always promptly and kindly favoured
Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Catalogue of Irish Zoophytes. 373
me with his opinion, and to whom, therefore, my most sin-
cere thanks are due.
For the beautiful drawings which accompany this commu-
nication, some of which I have had the pleasure of exhibiting
to the Society, I am indebted to the skill and perseverance of
a lady, whose name I would most willingly mention were I
authorized to do so.
Having brought this paper to a termination, it now only re-
mains for me, in the first place, to thank the Society for the
attention with which it has listened to me, and to hope that
any errors of detail which may have been noticed will be ex-
cused, when the time occupied, less than two months, not
merely in the preparation of the manuscript and drawings,
but also in obtaining the materials for it, is taken into consi-
deration ; and secondly, to beg its acceptance of a collection of
Irish zoophytes, a portion only of which is now upon the table.
In taking my leave for the present, I cannot refrain from
the expression of my most cordial wishes that the affairs of
this Society may “ go on and prosper,” conferring, as it must
necessarily do, moral and intellectual benefit, not merely on
the members composing it, but, through them, upon the
country at large. I shall at all times feel great pleasure in
contributing my mite towards the promotion of its objects.
With this paper terminate, I regret to say, my labours in
this interesting, and as yet not fully explored, field of natural
history. In a few days I shall be called upon to quit the
beautiful ocean,—beautiful in its strength, its purity, its fresh-
ness, its majesty, and in its infinity ; beautiful in calm and
storm; and its still more beautiful and ever-varying produc-
tions, in the study and contemplation of which I so much de-
light.
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES.
Pate VI. Fig. 1. A magnified representation of Coryne squamata. Fig.
2. Hermia glandulosa, a single polype, magnified, exhibiting the
reproductive gemmules. Fig. 3. Sertularia Margarita, nat. size.
Fig. 4. Do., magnified. Fig. 5. Sertularia pumila, magnified.
Prate VII. Fig. 1, 2. Thuiaria articulata.
Prate VIII. Fig. 1. Plumularia frutescens, natural size. Fig.2. Valkeria
imbricata, natural size. Fig. 3. Langenella repens? magnified.
Fig. 4. New species of Valkeria. Fig. 5, 6. Hippothoa lanceolata.
Piate IX. Fig. 1. Cellepora bimucronata. Fig.2. Lepralia ciliata, Fig.
3. L. appensa. Fig. 4. L. pedilostoma. Fig. 5. L. insignis. Fig. 6.
L. cylindrica. Fig. 7. L. punctata. Fig. 8. L. linearis: all mag-
nified.
Puate X. Fig. 1. Tubulipora lobulata, natural size. Fig. 2. The same
magnified. Fig. 3. Aleyonidium hirsutum, in its young state. Tig.
4. The same magnified. Fig. 5. Echinochorium clavigerum: a, one
of the polypes with its feelers retracted ; 6, one with the stomach
everted.
374 Mr Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
XL.—On the Composition of Chalk Rocks and Chalk Marl
by invisible Organic Bodies: from the Observations of Dr.
Ehrenberg. By THoomas Weaver, Esq., F.R.S., F.G.S.,
Viel Ae soe OC.
{Concluded from p. 315. ]
On the Composition of the Compact Limestone of Upper Egypt
and Arabia by the invisible Animalcules of the White Chalk
of Europe.
Born the nummulite limestone of the pyramids of Geza on
the left bank of the Nile, and the same kind of rock on the
right bank near Cairo, contain numerous microscopic ani-
malcules of the chalk, which serve as a cement to the Num-
mulites. 1 had often examined microscopically specimens
which I had brought from thence, but I did not succeed in
separating and rendering visible the different elements with
equal clearness, until I applied my newly-acquired practice,
which was much facilitated by immersing these stones a longer
time in water. ‘The same result attended the examination Oe
the other calcareous rock masses of Upper Egypt and Arabia,
showing that the animalcules of the chalk occupy in a sur-
prising manner a wide extent of country in Libya.
Nummiulite limestone, wherever occurring, has been mest
usually referred to the tertiary period, although perhaps often
belonging to the chalk. In Egypt it possesses no great ex-
tent. On the right bank of the Nile it is deposited only in
the small hills near Cairo, and on the left bank, as it appears,
in a tract extending from Siout to the declivity of the com-
pact limestone, which latter constitutes the mass of the rocks
that line the course of the Nile in Upper Egypt. It forms
the foundation and principal material of the Pyramids. North-
ward it is directly bordered by the slimy delta of the Nile, the
productive soil of Egypt. Between the Oasis of Jupiter Am-
mon and the Mediterranean, is a wide elevated plateau or table-
land of rock, among whose numerous organic remains are
known tertiary forms. The whole of Upper Egypt, as far as
Syene, has a similar character. In 1828, though assured
that its limestone rocks were more ancient than the tertiary
period, yet, from want of distinct fossils, I was doubtful
whether they might not be referred to the Jura formation.
On the south, and not far from Syene, this limestone is in-
cumbent on sandstone (Quadersandstein 7), and the two repose
on granite and the primary rocks connected therewith. I gave
these views in 1528 in the geologically coloured map which
accompanied the first section of the first volume of my Travels
in Egypt, Libya, Nubia, and Dongola.
It now results, from the microscopic examination which has
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl, 375
taken place, that the whole of the limestones of Benisuef,
Siout and Thebes, on the western bank of the Nile, and of
Cairo and Kinek (including the gray marl near Kineh), on
the eastern bank, and which inclose the Nile at an elevation
of frequently 100 to 300 feet above its level, extending along
the river full sixty German miles in length, are, like the
Nummiulite limestone, composed of an inconceivable accumu-
lation of microscopic calcareous-shelled animalcules, which
are of precisely the same genera and species as those which
constitute the chalk of Europe. The table-land formed by
these calcareous rocks extends far westward into the Desert,
and it is perhaps principally composed of them.
A new and unexpected light is thus thrown on these exten-
sive regions. The phanomena apparent in Egypt may be
connected with those of Western Africa. It has been already
shown that the same animalcules constitute the territory of
Oran, stretching far along the foot of the Atlas; and when we
consider the equality of surface which prevails in the plain of the
Great Desert, or Sahara, of the North of Africa, and compare
it with what I have myself seen along the whole extent of its
eastern border, as well as on a large portion of its northern, we
may be well permitted to think of a similarity of composition.
But these distinct indications of a similar organic influence
extend not merely to the west but also to the east of Cairo,
expanded into Asia. ‘The specimens collected by Dr. Hemp-
rich and myself from Hamam Faraun, and Tor in the Sinaian
portion of Arabia, which I had formerly considered as ash-
gray marl and yellowish-gray limestone of the tertiary epoch,
were now proved, by the new method of examination, to con-
sist of quite the same microscopic chalk animalcules as con-
stitute the hilly masses of Upper Egypt. And from hence
this formation appears to be continued eastward far into the
interior of the Great Desert plain, trending toward Palestine ;
but on the Arabian coast of the Red Sea we did not find it
further south than Tor, which locality alone, among all the
points of the east, yielded flints similar to those which occur
in the European chalk.
We have here to remark on the absence of siliceous animals
in this limestone and marl formation, while the so-called
Eeyptian pebbles and jaspers occupy the same position in
horizontal layers as the flints in the North of Europe, appear-
ing as their substitute. But in these Jaspers the organic sili-
ceous elements are no longer to be distinctly found by reason
of their intermixture with other substances, and their conse-
quent opacity, giving rise to dendritic and other delineations.
It seems as if the solution and conversion of the organic into
the inorganic in the Egyptian pebbles (Cazlloux d Egypte)
376 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
is throughout more perfect than it is in many flints, although
the constituent elements of both kinds of stone are very pro-
bably quite the same.
On the principal Organic Calcareous Forms which compose
the mass of all Chalk.
From what has been already stated, it is evident that the
production of the caleareous mass of the chalk is not to be
attributed, as formerly conceived, to the larger organic bodies,
but to the minuter, and in the greatest measure to such as
are invisible, consisting of eight genera of Polythalamia with
twenty-five species, and excluding all such as may be distin-
guished by the naked eye, that is, exceeding gyth of a line in
magnitude ; the latter, however, are comparatively rare. It
is possible that sev oral other, ae perhaps many species of the
same genera, may yet be discovered in the chalk, as well as
other genera, since the investigations hitherto ede could
only be applied to a minimum of its substance; yet, as these
were conducted by me on chalk from many regions, it does
not appear probable that other sections of the ‘animal king-
dom will be found to have taken so great a share in the form-
ation of chalk as the Polythalamia, the principal prevailing
forms of which I have indicated.
From the preceding it is also apparent that the chalk rocks
of all countries agree in their constituent organic forms not
only according to the zoological class, but also in genera, and
for the most part in species likewise; this character being not
confined to the white tender writing chalk of Kurope, but ex-
tending also to the compact limestone rocks of the North of
Africa and the West of Asia. Particularly striking is the
characteristic persistence of single forms through all these
different and widely-:eparated countries. Thus in all of them
are to be found otalia globulosa, with Textularia globulosa,
T. aciculata ?, and 7. striata, as well as Planulina turgida,
thus giving a common character to all these rock formations ;
and this character becomes the more important, when we con-
sider that these forms are the most numerous, and in fact are
the chief constituents of the chalk*.
* The Polythalamian forms which Mr. Lonsdale noticed in the English
chalk in 1837 as visible to the naked eye, and amounting to 1000 in one
pound of the chalk, and which, with Mr. Lyell, he has named Lenticulina
and Discorbis+, appear, judging by the figures, to be referable to Rotalia
ornata and R. globulosa, including perhaps fragments of Textularia globulosa.
I may here remark, that my continued researches on the Polythalamia of
the chalk have convinced me, that very frequently in the earthy coating of
+ Dr. Buckland’s Bridgewater Treatise, 2nd Edition, vol. i. p. 448. 1837.
Lyell’s Elements of Geology, 1838.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 377
If now the question be asked whether the forms which occur
in such masses in chalk belong to it exclusively, and are hence
to be considered characteristic of that estate I am almost
disposed to reply in the affirmative. The analogous forms
which occur in sea-sand, tertiary sand, and indeed in all mo-
dern formations, are viewed for the most part as different and
larger species, although of the same genera; and it does not
appear that any of these forms can be referred with perfect
certainty to such as are now living in the sea.
To the theory of the formation of limestone, the observation
is important, that these organic deeply-seated relations are
not peculiar to the chalk formation. The tertiary calcareous
beds consist, in like manner with the chalk, of multitudes of
such Polythalamian animals, which compose in many quarters
sandy sea-downs of great extent; and even in the sandy desert
of Libya we can recognize distinct Polythalamia. On the
other hand, having succeeded in discovering microscopic
Poly thalamia in the compact flints of the Jura limestone from
Cracow, which are of decidedly different forms from those
of the chalk, the calcareous animals being Nodosaria urceo-
lata, n. sp., and Soldania elegans, n. sp., and the siliceous
Pyxidicula prisca?, with fragments of soft sponges, it becomes
apparent that such invisible organic bodies were also present
in the formation of the Jura limestone.
On the Geographical Distribution of Living Polythalamia on
the African and Asiatic Coasts of the Mediterranean, and in
the Red Sea.
The materials collected by Dr. Hemprich and myself in the
Mediterranean refer to four points on the Libyan coast, and
one point on the Syrian coast. In regard to a second point on
the latter coast (St. Jean d’ Acre), I have acquired a knowledge
of some forms from the collection of Dr. Parthey.
From the Red Sea nine forms were made known to us by
d’ Orbigny, collected from sand presented to him by Deshayes.
But from the collections made by Dr. Hemprich and myself
from thirteen points along the whole length of the Red Sea, it
appears that very numerous forms exist. Of seven of those
points, one occurs on the western (African) coast at Suez, and
six on the eastern (Arabian) coast, namely, at ‘Tor, Erraie and
el Ard, Moileh, el Wusch and Gumfide; and of the remain-
ing six, five are islands on the Arabian side, namely, Sanafer,
flints, which is partly caleareous and partly siliceous, the original caleareous-
shelled animal forms have exchanged their lime for silex, without under-
going any alteration in figure, so that while some are readily dissolved by
an acid, others remain insoluble; but in the chalk itself all similar forms
are immediately dissolved.
378 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
Maksure, Barkan, Sanac and Ketumbul, and one an island
on the African side of the Red Sea, namely, Massaua.
It is possible that by repeated and closer examination of the
marine productions collected by us, many other Polythalamia
may be found besides those already discovered. In ‘the mean
time, as a preliminary, | have drawn up a list of the species
hitherto met with*. From this it results that the total num-
ber of species of Polythalamia observed in the Red Sea are
Jifty, and in the Mediterranean, on the Libyan and Syrian
coasts, twenty-seven. ‘Vhe new species derived from the two
seas amount to fifly-four, of which twenty-seven species are
peculiar to the Red Sea, and seventeen are common to both
seas. Particularly worthy of notice is the wide distribution
and massy development of the Peneroplis planatus and Sorites
Orbiculus, which are rare on the European coast. ‘These forms
are not only present almost everywhere in the East, but con-
stitute the predominant masses. On the other hand, the Ro-
talia Beccarii, which composes the Italian hills, occurs only
singly and very rarely in the Red Sea; and I nowhere found
it on the Libyan and Syrian coasts. ‘The Sorites Orbiculus I
have also from St. Domingo.
In reviewing these subjects, even a superficial comparison
of them with the contents of the chalk and chalk marl, is at-
tended with the striking result, that none of these living forms
to)
are found among the animalcules of the chalk, not even among
those which compose the compact limestone of the Egyptian
and Arabian rocks, and which are still partly washed by the
sea near Hamam Faratn.
Remarks on Polythalamia.
Aiter a preliminary view of the researches of earlier la-
bourers in this branch of zoological i inquiry, Dr. Ehrenberg ob-
serves:—A lively interest respecting the minute Polythalamian
bodies which enter into the composition of sea-sand was ex-
cited anew by the work of Alcide d’Orbigny in 1826, in which
are contained a great number of new species, while many of
those which were previously known are examined with greater
* Of d’Orbigny’s nine species from the Red Sea, there are three which
I cannot identify, namely, Triluculina bicarinata, Quingueloculina limbata,
and Q. punctata ; but the other six are probably these with which I have
become acquainted, and to which | have therefore given the same names,
namely, Textularia communis, Calcarina Defrancii, C. Gaudichaudi, Quin-
gueloculina sulcata, and Vertebralina striata. His Assilina (Nummutlina) ni-
tida | hold to be the Sorites Orbiculus.
Although I possess and have compared many of the Pelythalamia which
have been described by d’Orbigny derived from the same lccalities, yet 1
am in want of a great number of the originals named by him, and as this
author has generally given new names unaccompanied by descriptions, I
have not in most cases been able to determine to what form the name
given by him belongs.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 379
care, and an improved and easier view is taken of the whole
subject. By his active exertions he had collected between 600
and 700 species from the sea-sand of France, Italy, England,
the Isle of France, Sandwich Islands, the Malouine and Ma-
rian Isles, &c., of which, however, only 425 received names.
The whole mass of these microscopic animalcules, which he
again decidedly associates with the Mollusks and Cephalopods,
but in a distinct order under the name of Foramzniferes, are
distributed by him into five families, according to the spiral
or other form in the grouping of the cells; these families com-
prising fifty-two genera. On this work Deshayes made vari-
ous critical remarks in the Dictionnaire Classique. D’ Orbign
expressly states that the animal of the Polythalamia (his Fora-
minifera) resembles the Sepia in the structure of its body, al-
though much smaller, and then proceeds to give the essential
characters of the living body of the Polythalamia, yet without
naming specifically or generically any one animal from which
they were taken*.
Both Blainville ard Dujardin have made the correct obser-
vation that the minute shells of the Polythalamia are external
cases, and not, as incorrectly viewed by Denys de Montfort
and Alcide d’Orbigny, internal bones. Yet in referring the
microscopic so-called Cephalopods to the Infusoria, Dujardin
commits a mistake+. It was this contradiction between ob-
servers that induced Férussac, in his great work, Histoire Na-
turelle des Mollusques, to exclude the Foraminifers from the
class of the Mollusks; and others entertained similar objec-
tions, yet without assigning to them a correct position.
In the year 1831 J laid before the Academy contributions
to the knowledge of Coral animals, with an attempt to class
them physiologically ; which attempt was entirely founded on
my own observations of the living animalcules, when, accom-
panied by Dr. Hemprich, I travelled on the Red Sea in the
years 1828 and 1825. In that work I designated the Coral
animals as composed of two strongly marked organically di-
stinct groups, under the names of Anthozoa and Bryozoa. In
the year 1831 also, I communicated in the Symbole Physice
the first development made of the complicated structure of the
Halcyonella stagnorum, one of the Bryozoa, and showed that
it was quite similar to that of Flustra.
The researches of Dujardin in 1835 gave an entirely new di-
rection to the ideas which had been formed of the Polythala-
mia, showing that not a trace of resemblance was to be found
between them and Sepia; on the contrary, the greatest sim-
plicity of structure became apparent, bespeaking a simple ani-
* Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 1826, t. vii. p. 249.
+ dnnales des Sciences Naturelles. Seconde Série, t. iv. p. 343, 1835.
380 Mr. Weaver’s View of Khrenbers’s Observations
mal body covered by a shell, with the power of extending or
contracting itself at will. But when Dujardin expressly com-
pares the Polythalamia to the Proteus (Amoeba) of the Infu-
soria, such an association cannot be admitted, unless it be first
proved that a polygastric structure exists in those bodies. He
has given to them the new name of Rhizopodes.
I showed, in 1837, that the Polythalamia could not well
possess an organization similar to that of the Infusoria, as not
a single known true species of Infusoria has a calcareous shell ;
and I had, in 1823, discovered, as I conceived, a true living
Polythalamia of earlier authors, resembling in organization
the very complex Flustra. ‘The correctness of this view was
fully established in 1839, after having examined anew, ac-
cording to my improved method, the small Nautilus Orbzcu-
lus of Forskal, which d’Orbigny designated in 1826 as Num-
mulina (Assilina) nitida, specimens of which I had collected
from the sand of the Red Sea in 1823, and which I have
named Sorites Orbiculus. The result proved that the disc-like
shell was a Polypary, often composed of more than one hun-
dred singie animalcules, the cells of which quite resemble those
of a Flustra, the animal putting forth and retracting from six to
eight tentacula. And I even discovered in the interior of the
single cells well-preserved siliceous Infusoria, the last food
taken by the animal; and in some of them also small globu-
lar bodies, which, without much constraint, may be considered
as egos. ‘Though I had at an early period observed that the
disc was composed of many cells, yet I could not perceive an
opening to them; but the discovery of Infusoria in their in-
terior led me to consider by what means they could have been
introduced. Reflection reminded me that I had often seen
Coral animals which in the expanded state exhibited many
large bodies with tentacula and a large mouth, yet when con-
tracted left scarcely a trace of the openings through which
they were protruded from the common Polypary. As such I
remembered Pennatula, Lobularia, Halcyonium and similar
forms, in which I had frequently observed, that in the skin of
the animal existed calcareous particles, which on the contrac-
tion of the skin so completely closed the opening as to render
it no longer perceptible. Renewed examination of the closed
surface of the cells of the Nautilus Orbiculus, Forskal, now
showed to me that in them also dendritic calcareous particles
exist, the close approximation of which closes the cell, so that
the cover of the cell is in fact the dried skin of the animalcule.
I now made an experiment in proof, by dissolving the small
shell in dilute muriatic acid, in order to obtain the animal
body in a free state; and it succeeded perfectly. 1 obtained
as many animalcular bodies as there were cells, connected to-
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 381
gether by band-like processes, and in the interior of many of
them there were well-preserved siliceous Infusoria. I then
treated in the same manner the Flustra pilosa and F. membra-
nacea of the Baltic, and found in their interior also siliceous
Infusoria. The same results followed a similar examination
of the shells of otalia from the sand of Rimini, of the shells
of Peneroplis planatus, Pavonina Antillarum, and of Orbicu-
lina numismalis from the sea-sand of St. Domingo, as well as
of other shells with their animals from the sand of the Red Sea
and the Mediterranean; so that now a view is obtained of the
more general organization of the principal groups of the Po-
lythalamia.
It results clearly from what has been said in respect of these
species, which are so common and widely distributed, and which
have hitherto been designated in systems as small Nautili, that
the straight-jointed shells of Nodosaria (formerly viewed as
Orthocera), as well as the spiral shells of Rotalia, Cristellaria,
&e. (considered as Nautili or Ammonites), and the shells of
Biloculina resembling vermiform tubes (Serpula), are none of
them internal calcareous parts which were encased by an ani-
mal body, similar to the internal bone of Sepia, or the cylin-
drical spiral bone of Spirula; but, on the contrary, that they
are external calcareous shells, bearing analogy to those of
Mollusks, or more correctly to those of Flustra and Cellepora,
which, after separation by an acid, disclose and render visibly
free the internal simple body or the Polypary, exhibiting pre-
cisely the same form. If the shell of Polythalamia be fre-
quently perforated with pores, this is no proof that no other
openings exist, or that the animals receive nourishment through
many tubes, for the same structure is not unfrequently found
in Flustra accompanied with the peculiar opening from which
the fore-part of the animal body may be protruded; and in
these exist also fringe-like filaments, which are extensile and
retractile, and by no means to be compared to the pseudopo-
dia or variable feet of Amoeba, but probably bear analogy to
the mantle fringes of many Mollusks, applicable to the pur-
poses of creeping and attachment, and for which perhaps they
were specially designed. Moreover, Flustra possess a distinct
large animal organization; and the siliceous Infusoria, and
probable eggs found in Polythalamia, clearly bespeak in them
also similar relations, the discovery of which, however, had
hitherto been prevented by the calcareous encasement and the
minuteness of the objects.
It has resulted from the examination of the soft small ani-
mal bodies of living Polythalamia, that while many resemble
Flustra or Eschara assembled in families or polyparies, each
such family being often composed of hundreds of much mi-
382 Mr. Weaver’s View of Khrenberg’s Observations
nuter single animalcules, many others are single animals after
the manner of Mollusks. Hence arise external characters and
forms which have often a reference to very different relations,
which it is first necessary to distinguish before we can succeed
in obtaining a clear view of the whole. The assiduous and
careful labours of d’Orbigny retain their full value, serving
as a basis to all future researches; and if in the present com-
munications I shall have succeeded in turning the inquiry into
a more physiological channel, my object will be attained,
To the term Polythalamia, (originally introduced by Dr.
Brey n, of Danzig, in 1732,) a different extension or significa-
tion under oben: names has been given by different authors:
To remove this unsteadiness and wanton change of names,
which only lead to obscurity, it appears advisable to apply the
term Poly thalamia, in preference, as Soldani had done, to that
group in which the animalcules actually live in many cells, and
do not, like the Nautili, possess many empty cells. ‘This di-
stinction, that the animal of the Polythalamia has no empty
cells, but that all its cells are simultaneously occupied, is of
particular importance in their systematic arrangement among
other animal bodies. Where there are many cells, they consist
either of so many single animals, the whole constituting a poly-
pary, or of organically filled integrant portions of one and the
same individual forming groups. “Both structures are foreign to
the true Cephalopods. "The shell-bearing Cephalopods may
with Linnzeus be divided into the unilocular and multilocuiar.
On the other hand, the want of a sipho which has been as-
signed as a character of Polythalamia, and from which they
were named Asiphonoidea by De Haan, is incorrect, inasmuch
as many really possess a part which may be fully compared to
a sipho, if not in function, yet in form, namely, the tube which
connects the separate cells of Nodosarina and of all individual
many-celled forms. It is only i in the Miliolina family among
the simple Polythalamia, and it is only in the families of Aste-
rodiscina and Soritina among those forming polyparies, that
the want of a sipho is really necessary, because they live in-
dividually i in single cells. But all the Nodosarina, "Textula-
rina, Uvellina, Rotalina, and Plicatilia among the simple Po-
lythalamia, and the Frumentarina, Helicosorina, and Alveo-
linea among those which form polyparies, possess tubes of
connexion between the cells, which very frequently resemble
also in form the sipho of the Nautilus. D’Orbigny, it is true,
states also that the cells of Foraminifers are connected by se-
veral openings; that, however, proceeds from an erroneous
view, for such Poly thalamia alone present several openings at
the border of the cells, whose calcareous surface is interrupted
_in the form of a net-work, exhibiting often a relation analogous
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 383
to that which is frequent in Madrepora and Astrea, in which
the soft body is not divided or sharply cut off by com-
pact calcareous plates, but the soft parts appear interwoven
with minute calcareous rods, in a lattice-like manner. These
numerous small connecting openings, which are sometimes
visible in some of the Rotalia and Rosalina, and also in the
Textularia, [ do not consider essential, but hold that the true
channel of connexion has always a large diameter, and is sim-
ple for each single animal. The erroneous view of d’Orbigny
and of all his followers becomes so complicated, that polypa-
ries are held to be single animals, and consequently the vari-
ous connecting openings to be those of a simple individual.
With respect to d’Orbigny’s genus Nummulina, although
it has derived advantage from his diligent investigations, I
consider it as composed of very heterogeneous elements, which
belong to quite different divisions of animals. Some species
of the sub-genus Assilina, and perhaps all of them, may be-
long to the families Soriéina and Asterodiscina, while the As-
silina nitida of the Red Sea is assuredly Forskal’s Nautilus
Orbiculus, that is, Sorites Orbiculus.
I am of opinion that all those species which are provided
with visible traces of mouths or openings, as in Lamarck’s
genus Lenticulina with d’Orbigny’s character of Nummulina,
are to be received among the Polythalamia; but that all such
species as have the form of a lens or disc, and are provided
with internal spiral cells, but without a trace of such mouths,
the cells being moreover separated from the external surface
by thick calcareous layers, are to be considered as internal
bones. These mouthless Nummulina are rather to be ranged
with the Velellida of the Acalepha along with Porpita, where
similar internally cellular coin-shaped bones exist. The con-
siderable size of many Nummulina is also striking and foreign
to Polythalamia, but agrees very well with the family of the
Velellida, as also in the want of traces of the attachment of
muscles, and in the want of a sipho or channel of connexion
between the cells. Until better informed, therefore, I de-
cidedly exclude the mouthless Nummulina from the Polytha-
lamia, and retain only Lamarck’s Lenticulina in the sense at-
tached to d’Orbigny’s Nummulina in a young state.
The distinctive character of the Polythalamia, when com-
pared with their nearest relatives the Flustra, Eschara, Cri-
statella, &c., consists in the shell, and in their freedom of mo-
tion. But with this may be combined the power of attachin
itself to other bodies, just as in the Cristatella (or Hydra also)
which often remains long attached, and then creeps again,
Those bodies which are apparently Polythalamian, but are
really adherent and immoveable, belong to the Cedlepora,
384 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
Flustra, Tubulipora, and similar forms. The simplest Poly-
thalamian form is the M7/iola in Dujardin’s sense, if there be
really such self-existent animals, and they be not the young
of others, or of many-celled forms most nearly related to Bi-
loculina. And perhaps Gromza oviformis might be so viewed,
should it not prove to be a Difflugia (an Infusoria). In ehis
series I myself place provisionally, as doubtful, those nume-
rous small globules of the sand of Rimini which have no di-
stinct opening, or sometimes present a very minute one. ‘The
next simplest fovmis'thatal a simple straight row of cells, as
in the Nodosaria, a jointed continued development of a sim-
ple body. Textularina, Uvellina and Rotalina (Lenticulina),
may, as to external form, be viewed as Nodosarina developed
in another manner, namely, in botryoidal or spiral forms.
I have here to make a remark that appears important. In
the entire vast mass of known Polythalamia, a case or vest-
ment prevails which is either cuticular or composed of a cal-
careous substance, while in Infusoria either a cuticular or sili-
ceous substance prevails, so that hitherto no calcareous-shelled
Infusoria nor siliceous-shelled Polythalamia had presented
themselves. Yet among the fossi] microscopic organisms of
the chalk marl of Sicily, we find intermingled with the Infu-
soria shells bodies whose forms may be ranked with Poly-
thalamia, namely, with Nodosarina, ‘but the shells of which
are siliceous, insoluble in acids, and which to the eye have a
more transparent vitreous aspect than the calcareous shells
when penetrated by balsam. I have hence been induced to
place these siliceous-shelled forms, unti! a further knowledge
may be acquired of their organization, among the polygastric
Infusoria near the shelled Amoeba, in a separate family, under
the name of Arcellina composita, or Polycystina*. Such sili-
ceous-shelled Polycystina, resembling calcareous-shelled Po-
lythalamia, are the genera Lithocampe, Cornutella and Ha-
liomma, with several species.
I wish here to draw attention to a small character hitherto
unregarded, which is distinctive of true Polythalamia, and
often even of their fragments. It consists in this, that in the
tube or channel of connexion between the cells, the mouth of
the tube which belongs to the earlier smaller cell is overgrown
and surrounded by the succeeding larger cell. If the mouth
of the last cell be prolonged in a beak-like form, we find in
all the earlier smaller cells a distinct tube, quite similar to the
hard remains of the sipho in the Nautilus; but so placed that
the tube always projects forward from the smaller into the
larger cell, and never backward from the larger into the smaller
* This view has been already indicated in the work “On the Infusoria
as perfect organisms,” 1838, p. 136.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 385
cell. In the Nautilus, this projection of the tube of connexion
is reversed, always proceeding from the larger to the smaller
chamber, so that in the last, the greatest chamber, the body
of the animal thus acquires a smooth foundation, upon which
it can move more freely. In true Nautili also the base of the
cells is concave or undulated in the forward direction, while
in the Polythalamia it appears without exception to be either
quite straight or convex in that direction. This character
was also observed by Fichtel and Moll.
The tabular view which I have given of the Bryozoa, found-
ed as it is on the new observations which I have made, is
drawn up with special regard to a definite expression of fossil
phzenomena, the ancient names of d’Orbigny being mostly re-
tained. This very diligent precursor in these studies first laid
down a foundation rich in forms and systematically ordered,
which may serve for all future investigations, and has given
names to families which are well adapted to his purpose; but
these I have been obliged to alter, yet not arbitrarily, inas-
much as from the difference of our views it became necessary
to separate from each other the forms which constitute his
families, according as they are either simple Polythalamia, or
Polythalamia composing polyparies.
Since the foregoing pages were drawn out, a newer work
by Dr. Ehrenberg has made its appearance, embracing com-
munications made to the Berlin Academy, on the continued
researches of the author between September 1839 and August
1840, and bearing the title, “On the numerous Living Species of
Animals found in the Chalk Formation*.” Of this very inter-
esting publication I had designed presenting an abstract, but
having learned that a complete English edition of the work is
about to appeart accompanied by the engravings, I now con-
fine myself to a few notices immediately connected with the
preceding part of this paper.
In this memoir Dr. Ehrenberg repeats his objections to the
views entertained by MM. Alcide d’Orbigny and Dujardin.
It has been seen, that to the Polythalamia, whose minute and
often microscopic calcareous shells compose in inconceivable
numbers, and in now nearly 1000 known different forms, the
principal mass of chalk rocks and of many sands of the sea,
M. d’Orbigny had several years since ascribed an external
animal bearing the form of a Sepia, the small shell itself, which
* Ueber noch zahlreich jetzt-lebende Thierarten der Kreidebildung, pp. 94,
with four plates, Berlin, 1840. ;
¢ In the Scientific Memoirs of Mr.R. Taylor. Its publication cannot
fail to prove very acceptable to British Naturalists in general.
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2C
386 Mr. Weaver’s View of Khrenberg’s Observations
often resembles an Ammonite or Nautilus, being considered
as the internal bone. On the other hand, at a later period,
M. Dujardin denied that these animals possessed any organic
structure, stating that they consisted simply of an animated
slime capable of extension, encased by an indurated external
shell, and associating them with the pseudopodian Amoeba
of the Infusoria. Dr. Ehrenberg now further demonstrates,
by figures and descriptions, their true organic structure, thus
fully establishing his former positions, both as to simple Po-
lythalamia and Polythalamia forming Polyparies. He proves
that they are not internal bones, but external shells encasing
a soft body, the shell being perforated, as it were, in all parts
by numerous pores, from which the animal projects long fila-
ments, capable at will of extension, retraction and bifid divi-
sion, and productive of locomotion. ‘The author further ob-
serves: M. Dujardin has, in August 1840, presented to the
Paris Academy a Mémoire sur une Classification des Infusoires
en rapport avec leur organisation, in which a new arrangement
of the Infusoria is exhibited, and in this the Polythalamia are
again introduced as RAzzopodes in association with Amoeba and
Actinophrys of the Infusoria, forming a separate family. If,
however, anatomical and physiological details are to be taken
into account when we proceed to the systematic arrangement
of different organic bodies, and we are not governed merely
by the relations of external forms, M. Dujardin’s arrangement
cannot be deemed a happy one. He has in no case shown a
polygastric structure in the Rhizopodes, and that it is not po-
lygastric is proved anew by my investigations now commu-
nicated.
It has been shown in a former part of this paper that Dr.
Ehrenberg had recognized six species of Infusoria in the chalk
formation, so closely resembling living species as not to be di-
stinguished from them, and hence he was led to give to them
the same names; namely, Hunotia Zebra, Fragilaria rhabdo-
soma, Fragilaria striolata ?, Gallionella aurichalca, Navicula
ventricosa, and Synedra ulna. He had also referred, with a
mark of interrogation, the following four species of calcareous-
shelled Polythalamia to the white chalk, in which they are
very extensively distributed, namely, Globigerina bulloides,
Globigerina helicina, Rosalina globularis, and Textilaria aci-
culata, all of which were stated by M. d’Orbigny to have oc-
curred in the living state only in the Adriatic Sea and the
Ocean. If any doubt had existed as to the identity of all these
fossil and living species, it has been completely removed by
the later researches of Dr. Ehrenberg, by which the actual
number of known species found in the chalk formation and in
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl. 387
the living state has been extended to fifty-seven, namely, of
calcareous-shelled Polythalamia nine species, and of siliceous-
shelled Infusoria forty-eight species. The following is a list
of these species and of the localities in which they occur, both
in the living and fossil state. In the fossil localities, W. C.
signifies white chalk, C. M. chalk marl, and C. C. compact
chalk.
Calcareous-shelled Polythalamia.
Living. Fossil.
1. Globigerina bulloides Rook Sea a C. Denmark.
helicina . . 2...) —————$——-——-__ W..C. Cattolica.
. Rosalina globularis . — W.C. Gravesend.
: een eyzou \ North Sea,nearCuxhaven W. C. Cattolica.
otalia) ocellata. .
{ W.C.in Russia, Poland,
| Prussia, | Denmark,
el England, France and
} Sicily; and C. M. in
| Greece, Zante, Sicily
eS bo
5. Rotalia globulosa . .._ ———-——
and Oran.
; W.C. Cattolica.
e CC eae tea ea Ae aC Caliasinieten’
W. C. England, France,
Te (Synon. Planu- Prussia, Denmark.
lina?) turgida .. i Tey C. M. Oran.
C. C. Egypt and Arabia.
WC: Prussia, Den=
mark, England and
oe sand Sicily.
Adriatic and the Ocean | @ yy. Greece:
C. C. Egypt and Arabia.
W. C. of all European
countries, from Wolsk
| to Ireland.
8. Textilaria aciculata .
globulosa ... North Sea.........
C. M. Sicily, Oran, and
Greece.
C. C. Egypt and Arabia.
Szliceous-shelled Infusoria.
10. Actinocyclus quina- { North Sea, Tjorn Isle in| Me Caltacncree,
MIUS(r heheh ces the Cattegat ...... a ; ;
11. —— biternarius. .. North Sea, Tjorn.... CSS Hae NEG
é North Sea, Cuxhaven, { C. M. Oran, Caltasinet-
os = mae at ha Christiania, Tjorn. . . ta, and Greece.
. = C. M. Oran, Caltasinet-
13. septenarius .. North Sea in the Cattegat ta aud Zante.
cathe. _ J C.M. Oran and Caltasi-
14. octonarlus)..... = =e
15. nonarius .... N.Sea,CattegatnearTjorn. C. M. Oran.
16. denarius .... ——————————_—__. C. M. Oran.
3 $$
ie undenarius. . | and’ Bay of Christiania’ } ©: M. Oran and Zante.
18. —— bisenarius. ... Cattegat near Tjdrn ... CC. M. Oran.
19. quindenarius . , ————————_—__......._ C.. M. Oran.
20. Amphitetras antedita | eee Ma Oran and Greree
WIE Ay Ae aes ee nec
2C2
388 Mr. Weaver’s View of Ehrenberg’s Observations
Living. Fossil.
Baltic, N. Sea, Mediter-
21. Biddulphia pulchella. ranean, and Ocean near + C. M. Greece.
Cubawoi tae eierene are
<2 Coc ite: Brackish and fresh waters. C. M. Greece.
iloeW bce Oo Gm Glo ec :
C. M. Caltasinetta and
23. Coscinodiscus Argus. North Sea, Cuxhaven .. On
———————————, Tjorn
24, eccentricus ... in Cattegat, and Mexi- +} C. M. Oran.
| can Gulf, Vera Cruz.
25. lineatus®. << <7. North Sea, Cuxhaven .. C. M. Caltasinetta.
26 ae C.M. Caltasinetta, Oran,
olen — ah, iY) | and Zante.
27, —— Oculus Iridis. . ———————————— .... CC. M. Greece.
28 Patinaytemey- ists 7. C. Me Zante.
P ANd ||| CME; Oran, Caltasinetta,
oie Pars a { Baltic, Wismar. ... . and Zante.
C. M. Caltasinetta, Oran,
Zante, and Greece.
° N. Sea, Christiania and) C. M. Oran and Caltasi-
aT HIDE Gio ‘Tjorn, & Baltic, Wismar f _ netta.
Pentasterias .. N.Sea, Christiania liaven. C. M. Zante.
N. Sea, Cuxhaven, Chris-] © y7, Caltasinetta, Oran,
30. Dictyocha sulcata . . North Sea near Tjérn . .
33. —— Speculum ... tiania and ‘Tjorn, Bal- Zante, and Greece,
tie; near Miek ~2 3 is.
34. Eunotia granulata . . Brackish and fresh waters. C. M. Greece.
35. Zebray.reoshers Berlin fresh waters. ... OC. M. Greece.
36. Fragilariarhabdosoma Berlin, Halle, Copen- } W. C. Gravesend
hagen, Sweden . .
StrlOlatary = shee ts sole ee) ee hele. eines W. C. Gravesend.
Berlin fresh waters, Leip-
zig, Thuringia, Fran-
38. Gallionella aurichalca conia, Wiirzburg, Stutt- > W. C. Rugen.
gart, and on rocks near
the Faroe Isles
; C. M. Caltasinetta, Oran,
5 Zante, and Greece.
40. Grammatophora afri- | sea, Heligoland, Tjrn C- M. Oran.
39. suleata. st's < - North Sea, Cuxhaven .
41. angulosa .... North Sea, Tjorn .... C. M. Oran.
Callao in Peru, Vera Cruz
in Mexico, Tjorn in
42 oceanica .... Cattegat, Wismar in >C. M. Oran.
Baltic, and the Mediter-
Tanean sete eons) eee
43
Among marine Conferve
undulata .. - -{ SATE Airg ee ee 2, C. M. Greece.
C. M. Greece.
44. Haliomma radians . . North Sea, Cuxhaven . .
45. Navicula Didymus. . { N. Sea, Cuxhaven, Baltic, ©. M.Galunincies
Wasa) en © rcue ene
46. —— Entomon.... N. Sea, Christianiahaven. C. M. Greece.
47. —— norwegica ... ————___________ C.. M. Grreeee.
ep ae So | and Tjorn Isle. ... he. we SEES,
Paris, Berlin, Saxony, Bo-
49. —— ventricosa. . . | hemia, Buchtarma a C. M. Oran.
Altai, and Irtysch.
; Berlin fresh waters, sant
C.
50. VITIG ape eer
senfels in Saxony, and
Wismarin Mecklenburg.
M. Greece.
on the Organic Composition of Chalk and Chalk Marl, 389
Living. Fossil.
Flints of the W. C. near
51. Peridinium pyropho- . ‘ Gravesend, and Flints
PUM ei hic ae eee Baltic, near Kiel. of the plain of North
Germany near Delitzsch.
Gulf of Flensburg, Break- } C. M. Oran
ers near Gothenburg. Va :
Baltic near Wismar, Ber-
52. Striatella arcuata...
lin fresh waters, North
of Germany, Denmark,
53. Synedra ulna... .. Scotland, Holland, the > C. M. Oran.
Ural, and perhaps Isle
of France, and Masca-
rene) Isles. 35; th aie
54, Tessella Catena ... nee M. Caltasinetta.
55. Triceratium Favus. . North Sea, Cuxhaven.. C. M. Greece.
Flints of W. C. Graves-
56. Xanthidiumfurcatum Berlin .......... end, and Flints of
! Delitzsch.
Flints of W. C. Graves-
57. hirsutum .... Peat waters near Berlin. end, and Flints of
' Delitzsch.
Of these fifty-seven species, thirty belong to the geolo-
gically acknowledged chalk and its Sicilian marls. The re-
mainder from Oran, Greece (probably Egina), and Zante,
though perhaps from beds not equally well defined by relative
position as chalk marls, yet occurring, as they do, with nume-
rous decided calcareous and siliceous animals of the chalk,—
the geological relations of these species may also be considered
as firmly established.
These new discoveries naturally lead to the conclusion that
we have now no very definite boundary between secondary
and tertiary tracts, and that the first dawn or eocene period
of the present living organic creation, must be sought for
deeper than the chalk formation; a view that appears to be
confirmed by the occurrence of a living Trochus below the
chalk, of the Paludina vivipara and Cyclas cornea in the
Weald Clay, and of the Terebratula caput serpentis in the
- Upper Oolite. But as this and other interesting conclusions
and views entertained by the author will be shortly laid open
to the reader, with a full detail of the progressive researches
made, I shall not now enter further upon the important mat-
ter contained in the volume.
390 Mr. Weaver on M. Alcide d@Orbigny’s View
APPENDIX.
Closely connected with the preceding subjects is the valu-
able Memoir of M. Alcide d’Orbigny, which has recently ap-
peared, entitled, ‘On the Foraminifers of the White Chalk of
the Paris Basin*®.” ‘The subjoined extracts may serve to con-
vey a view of the general scope of the work, which, placed in
parallel with that of Dr. Ehrenberg, cannot but excite a dou-
ble interest in the mind of the reader.
Previously to entering upon the direct object of the Memoir,
M. d’Orbigny indulges in a few general reflections.
Let us, says the author, cast a rapid glance upon what has
existed and upon what still exists in nature, in reference to
the Foraminifers. We have found them distributed through
the oolite series, extending from the lias to the uppermost
beds; but in the cretaceous system they appear still more
numerously and more varied in their forms. The Neocomian
beds, those of the gault and the green sand, contain many ;
but in proportion as we ascend from the lower to the higher
strata, they increase infinitely. In these latter the rock may
be said to be often composed of them, and, as an example,
we may mention the largest of the Pyramids of Egypt. In
the white chalk the number is nearly as great as in those seas
in which they now most abound. In a word, we have found
Foraminifers in the cretaceous basins of the Seine, the Loire,
the Gironde, and of the whole South of France, and in
Belgium.
If we pass to the tertiary tracts, a whole world is opened
to us. The multiplied Foraminifers which appear in the
basins of Paris, Bourdeaux, Touraine, Italy, Austria, Ger-
many, England, and Belgium, often form there the greater
part of the mass. A bed of considerable thickness in the
environs of Gentilly, near Paris, is entirely composed of them,
the Foraminifers being in contact with each other, scarcely
united by a slight cement. In a cubical inch of the rock we
have found fifty-eight thousand, which is equal to three thou-
sand millions in a metre, and shows what myriads may exist
in the Paris basin. These small bodies, which we thus see
forming entire beds in the lowest portions of the tertiary series,
are not less common in the higher stages; for in Austria, and
* Memoire sur les Foraminiferes de la Craie Blanche du Basin de Paris,
in the 4th vol, part 1 of the Transactions of the Geological Society of
France, 1840.
of the White Chalk of the Paris Basin. 391
in the environs of Sienna in Italy, they often constitute one-
sixth of the fossil mass; they are also extensively distributed
in the Crag of England* and of Belgium. So much in refer-
ence to what has existed; let us now throw a glance upon
that which exists.
We are in the present day acquainted with Foraminifers
from every region of the sea, and we know that they exist in
extent from the equator to the frozen portions of continents.
If we judge of the important part they play by their numbers
in certain quarters, it will be impossible to doubt that their
remains form the greater part of the banks of sand which im-
pede navigation, obstruct gulfs and straits, fill up ports, and
form with corals those isles which are daily rising in warm
regions from the bosom of the ocean.
Thus these minute shells, which, anterior to our epoch,
have assisted in leveling basins of immense extent, and in
forming mountains, are now still constantly changing the
depth of coasts and modifying the bottom. This view of their
agency in nature is doubtless sufficient to prove the import-
ance which attaches to their study.
We will add, that the comparative study of the fossil Fora-
minifers of all beds has proved to us a fact important to
geology, namely, that each bed has its characteristic species,
which serve to distinguish it, let the circumstances be what
they may; and as these minute shells are infinitely more com-
mon than those of Mollusks, the knowledge to be derived
from them is so much the more certain, and becomes extremely
interesting.
Another fact no less curious has been demonstrated to us
by the study of living species from every region of the globe.
Many genera are peculiar to the hottest zones of continents,
while others, on the contrary, are found only in temperate
or cold regions. Hence the geographical distribution of
living genera and species offers to us a means of comparison
of the highest importance with a view to the determination of
the temperature of the waters in which fossil species lived,
* Mr. Lyell has communicated to us the species which he discovered
in the Crag. ;
+ We are acquainted at present with nearly fifteen hundred living and
fossil species of Foraminifers ; and how many important facts may be de-
rived from the study of these small bodies may be seen in three works
which we are now publishing: 1. the Fauna of the Antilles, printed in
L Histoire politique, physique, et naturelle de I Ile de Cuba, by M. dela Sagra ;
2. that of the Canaries, published in ? Histoire Naturelle of those islands,
by MM. Webb and Berthelot; 3. the Fauna of the southern extremity of
America, forming a part of our Voyage dans ? Amérique Meéridionale.
392 Mr. Weaver on M. Alcide d’Orbigny’s View
and may lead to very satisfactory results in geology, if we
may judge by the fruits of our observations in this respect.
We could have desired to establish some general facts of
much greater extent, founded on new observations recently
made by us on the class of the Foraminifers; but the pre-
sent occasion not admitting such an extension, let us pass to
the Foraminifers of the white chalk of the Paris basin.
The geological position of the white chalk of Paris is so
well known that we have not thought it necessary to speak of
it; yet, if we seek to determine its position relatively to the
other cretaceous beds by means of the Foraminifers it con-
tains, compared with living species, the faczes of the genera
and species proves to us, that the chalk of Maestricht, of Fau-
quemont (Belgium), of Tours, of Chavagne, and of Vendome,
is above it; while, on the contrary, all the other beds are
below it; thus in the chalk of Maestricht and the upper beds
of the basins of the Loire, we recognize only genera still ex-
isting, or at least occurring in tertiary tracts, while the white
chalk of the Paris basin already exhibits to us different genera,
such as Flabellina, Verneuilina, and Gaudryina, and a great
number of species quite distinct.
It would therefore be easy to establish, by means of the
Foraminifers alone, the relative antiquity of the cretaceous
beds; but we must previously make two geographical sections
quite independent of each other, founded on the zoological
forms; the first comprising the entire basin of the Seine, of
the Loire, of Belgium, and of England, in which we find a
striking analogy between the species found in all the beds,
from the lowest to the highest, with a regular passage from
one to the other; the second, comprising the West and South
of France, in which the species of Foraminifers have not
ouly no analogy with those of the other section, but in which,
moreover, almost all the genera are different. If we seek an
example of this fact, we shall find it on comparing the green
sand of the environs of Mans with that of the mouth of the
Charente. ‘The first, which in fact contains species approxi-
mating to those of the white chalk of Paris, contains already
several species analogous to those which have lived up to that
bed; while the second, with perfectly distinct species, pre-
sents to us genera different from all that we know in the cre-
taceous beds of the North of France and of Belgium.
The Foraminifers are sufficient to establish the following
descending order of superposition in the cretaceous beds ;—
of the White Chalk of the Paris Basin. 393
Group of the North of France and of Group of the West and South of
Belgium. France.
Upper chalk of Maestricht and Fau-
quemont (Belgium).
Coral chalk of Valognes and Nehou.
Coral chalk of the basin of the Loire,
at Vendome (Loir and Cher), at
Chavagne (Maine and Loire), at
Tours (Indre and Loire).
White chalk of Ciply (Belgium).
White chalk of Paris, of the depart-
ments of Yonne and Aube, and of
England.
Nummulite chalk ef Royan (Charente
Inférieure), of Saint Martory (Haute
Garonne), of Saint Gaudens, &c.
Coral chalk of Saintes (Charente Inféri-
eure).
Chalk marl of the Loire, with Gryphea Ammonite chalk of Martrous, near
columba. Rochefort (with Gryphea columba).
Caprine chalk of the Isle of Aix, of the
Corbiéres (Aude).
Green sand of Mans (Sarthe). Green sand of Fouras, of the Isle of
Aix, and Corbiéres.
Gault of the environs of Troyes (Aube).
Neocomian tract of Aube.
To establish zoologically what we have advanced, let us
pass in review the succession of the genera, and endeavour to
convey an idea of the modifications which have taken place in
the Foraminifers of the cretaceous system, in the ascending
order of the beds.
At the epoch of the Neocomian formation we have hitherto
found only the genus Textularia.
The green sand presents, as we have said, two series of
genera nearly distinct. “That of the mouth of the Charente
contains the genera Dentalina, Cristellaria, Lituola, Alveolina,
Chrysalidina, and Cuneolina; that of Mans, the genera Den-
talina, Citharina, Frondicularia, Flabellina, Cristellaria, Bu-
limina, and Guttulina. Hence we see, that, with the excep-
tion of two genera common to both localities, all the rest are
different in each of them.
If we follow our examination of the succession of genera in
the cretaceous groups of the South and the North, we shall
find —
1, That in the South the same genera of the green sand
are reproduced in the Caprine chalk. By degrees they pre-
vail at length in the upper beds, and are reduced to the Cris-
tellaria alone in the environs of Saintes; but near the mouth
of the Gironde (at Royan) they are accompanied by the
genera Nummulina and Guttulina, as well as on the whole
line of the foot of the Pyrenees, at Saint Martory, at Saint
Gaudens, extending into the department of Aude; thus pre-
394 Mr. Weaver on M. Alcide d’Orbigny’s View
senting a zone well characterized by the abundance of Num-
mulina, of which we have not found the analogue in the creta-
ceous beds of the North of France.
2. That in the North the succession is far from taking place
in the same manner; and that the Foraminifers, in much
greater numbers, present a larger suite in superposition, with
facts not less curious. ‘The genus Cztharina, which consti-
tutes the greatest portion of the species in the oolite forma-
tion, ceases with the green sand of Mans, being found no
further in the cretaceous beds. In the chalk marl of the banks
of the Loire we meet for the first time with the genus Lituola
with the Dentalina; but all at once, in the white chalk, we
observe a great number of species, among which, with all the
genera and even some analogous species of the green sand of
Mans, there appear for the first time on the globe the genera
Nodosaria, Marginulina, Valvulina, Rotalina, Rosalina, Trun-
catulina, Uvigerina, Verneuilina, Gaudryina, Globigerina, Py-
rulina, Sagrina, Flabellina, and Frondicularia. These genera
contain a considerable number of species; but with the white
chalk the genus F/abellina ceases, which had continued hitherto
from the green sand, and the genera Verneuilina and Gau-
dryina, which first appear in the white chalk, also terminate
with it; while in its interior the Frondicularia abound, as well
as species whose cells form a pile on a single line.
The white chalk of Ciply, although contemporaneous with
that of the Paris basin, since it also contains Flabellina, does
not present the same species, and may perhaps be a little
higher in the series, but we have not as yet sufficient data to
enable us to affirm this fact.
In the beds which we consider higher in the series than
the white chalk of Paris, namely, in the coral chalk of Tours,
of Chavagne, and of Vendome, we meet for the first time
with the genera Polystomella, Polymorphina and Globulina,
yet accompanied with the same genera as those of the white
chalk, with the exception of those whose discontinuance we
have noticed; again, in the upper chalk of Maestricht and
Fauquemont we have, with the three genera just mentioned,
also the genera Nonionina, Fawasina, and Heterostegina.
All are found living at present, or at least occurring in ter-
tiary tracts; but we arrive at the last beds of the cretaceous
group without having seen a single species of the Miliola of
Lamarck (our order of Agathistégues), which, as we ascer-
tained in 1825, only commences with the tertiary beds, and
may be considered as the most certain sign of a change of
formation.
This rapid survey shows that in ascending from the lower
of the White Chalk of the Paris Basin. 395
to the higher beds of the cretaceous group, the genera and
species of Foraminifers progressively increase, and that the
forms, at first very simple, analogous to those of oolitic tracts,
afterwards more complicated and specially appropriate to the
lower beds of the cretaceous system, have at last been replaced
in the upper parts by forms still more varied, the whole re-
curring in tertiary tracts, and even in the living state; facts
5
which it has appeared to us important to establish in the hi-
story of Paleontology.
M. A. d’Orbigny then proceeds to describe the species of
Foraminifers found by him in the white chalk of the Paris
basin. The following is a list of them, together with their
localities :—
Localities.
1. Nodosaria limbata ..........+. Meudon: very rare.
UE enebinia acalestanieee Common at Sens: more rare at Meudon and in
‘ England.
Meudon: rare. Its analogue is found fossil in
3. —— communis ...... the Subapennine tracts of Italy and Austria,
and living in the Adriatic.
SSRACHIS| | enscsencesee At Sens and in England.
ie ROS: ae an spare at Sens, more rare at Meudon and
St. Germain.
6. ————— Lorneiana ......... Only in the environs of Sens.
Very common at Sens, Meudon, and St. Ger-
7. Ee ee oe ee te main, and in the chalk of England. : Found
also in the green sand of the environs of
Mans (Sarthe).
8 mnlGcecta 2: Sens, St. Germain: rare. Also at Maestricht
F rarely.
Common at Sens, very rare at Meudon, St.
9. Marginulina trilobata ..... ! Germain, and in England: found only in
the young state.
Meudon: very rare. Occurs also in the green
Lok Sar Ran) pe acta sand in the environs of Mans.
Common near Sens, very rare at Meudon and
il elongata ......+5- ' St. Germain. Occurs also in the chalk of
Ciply.
12, ————— gradata ......+++0. Only near Sens.
13. ———— raricosta .........+++ Meudon: very rare.
14. Frondicularia radiata .. ..... Meudon and St. Germain: very rare.
15. ———— elegans .........++. Meudon and Sens: very rare.
16 Seasiousdiniia Common at Sens, on the banks of the Yonne;
. oh rare at St. Germain and Meudon.
17. ————— _Archiaciana ...... Meudon and Sens: rare.
18. ————— ornata .......sseeeses Found only once at Meudon.
i9. —— tricarinata ......... Environs of Sens: seems to be rare.
20. ————— angulosa............ Meudon: very rare.
21. Flabellina rugosa ............ Sens and Meudon : common
22, ————— Baudouiniana.....Only at Sens.
23, ——-—— pulchra ............ Meudon: very rare.
Very common in the white chalk of Meudon,
24, Cristellaria rotulata......... St. Germain, Sens, and in England. Occurs
also in the green sand near Mans.
25 MAN ICH AN oan. acorns Sens and Meudon: rare.
26. —————- triangularis......... Sens: very rare.
27 VECtall hucewcesoe oad Meudon and St. Germain: rather rare.
396 Mr. Weaver on M. Alcide d’Orbigny’s View
Localities.
28. Cristellaria Gaudryana ...... Only at St Germain: rare.
Very common at Sens in the complete state, at
St. Germain only young, and adult very
29. Lituola nautiloidea......... jarelyiat Mendon) @ccursralsolinthebetallc
of England.
EONAR Atalina Wolizigiaweeat Nee common at Meudon, St. Germain, and in
ngland.
31. Michelinna’:.. Common at St. Germain, Meudon, and in
ngland ; rare at Sens.
Common at Meudon and St. Germain ; rare at
Sens and in England ; common also in the
oP tertiary tracts of Austria. Its analogue is
32. umbilicata ...... } found living at Rimini in the Adriatic, there
being no difference between the fossil and
L living species.
St. Germain, Meudon, and England: rather
33. ————— CTASSA osceceorece Care.
Tae St. Germain, England, and upper chalk of
34. Cordieriana Maestricht. ;
35. Globigerina cretacea ......++. St. Germain and England.
36. —————— elevatas..coreccoscces Common near Sens; rare in England.
$7. Truncatulina Beaumontiana.Meudon and England: rare.
Common at St. Germain and Meudon; rare at
Pa : :
38. Rosalina Lorneiana ...... Sens and in England.
39 Clementiana ...... Rare at St. Germain, more common in England.
40. Valvulina gibbosa ............ St. Germain : rare.
41. Verneuilina tricarinata ...... St. Germain and Sens: rather rare.
Le Very common at Meudon; rare at St. Germain
42. Bulimina obtusa............ and in England.
- Very common at Meudon, St. Germain, Sens,
43. ————— obliqua ......... and in England.
as iabili Very common at Sens; rare at Meudon, St.
° Ms a cae Germain, and in England.
; Very common at Meudon, St. Germain, and
45. ————— Drevis ....eceeeeee Sorig
46. ————— Murchisoniana ...St. Germain and England: rare.
47. Uvigerina tricarinata ......... Sens: very rare.
Ae ina acuminata Very rare at Sens and St. Germain ; very com-
pete es eee mon at Meudon.
49. Gaudryina rugosa ......... Meudon: St. Germain, and Sens: rather com-
50. aeatlos Ratber common at Meudon, Sens, St. Germain,
3 id aba a and in England.
5]. Textularia trochus ............ Only at Meudon.
59. Asie ain. «Nei Sens, Meudon, St. Germain, and England,
without being common.
54> Baudoniniana.. se: St. Germain and Meudon: rare.
54. Sagrina rugosa ......... .. .«.5t. Germain and Meudon.
From the preceding list it appears, that of the fifty-four
species found in the white chalk of the Paris basin, thirty-
eight occur at Meudon, thirty-three at Saint Germain, and
twenty-eight at Sens: of these numbers, nzne are peculiar to
Meudon, ¢wo to Saint Germain, and szz to Sens, while all
the others are simultaneously common to two or three locali-
ties, thus proving the perfect identity of the beds. It will be
seen also, that of these fifty-four species, Zwenty-two are com-
mon to the white chalk of England also.
of the White Chalk of the Paris Basin. 397
Of the fifty-four species, seven occur also in lower or higher
beds: thus in the green sand of Mans are found three spe-
cies, Dentalina sulcata, Marginulina compressa, and Cristel-
laria rotulata; in the coral chalk of Tours, which is higher
in position than the white chalk, two species, Bulimina obtusa
and Textularia turris 3 and in the chalk of Maestricht, being
the highest in position, two species, Dentalina naligcodata
and Rotalina Cordieriana. We also find two species, the
analogues of which occur both fossil in the tertiary tracts of
Austria and Italy, and in the living state in the Adriatic,
namely, Dentalina communis and Rotalina umbilicata. With
these exceptions there still remain forty-seven species peculiar
to the white chalk, showing clearly that it forms a bed distinct
from all the rest of the cretaceous system, belonging to a small
local fauna well-defined.
On comparing the above genera given by M. d’Orbigny
with those named by Dr. Ehrenberg in his tabular view of
the Bryozoa, inserted in the early part of this paper, it will
be seen that Nodosaria, Dentalina, Marginulina, Frondicu-
laria are included in the family of the Nodosarina of the latter
author; Cristellaria, Rotalina, Truncatulina, included in his
family of the Rotalina; Globigerina, Rosalina, Valvulina,
Bulimina, Uvigerina, Pyrulina, in his family of the Uvellina;
and Textularia in his family of the Textularina. The Lituola
nautiloidea of Lamarck and d’Orbigny is the Coscinospira
nautiloides of Ehrenberg, included in the Fabularina family
of the latter.
If we now, observes M. d’Orbigny, compare the fauna of the
Foraminifers of the white chalk with those of different seas,
with a view of determining the analogy of composition, and of
obtaining data respecting the temperature of that basin at the
time when these species lived, we shall find this analogy more
striking in the Adriatic Sea than anywhere else. There only,
the same as in the chalk, are found in abundance Nodosaria,
Dentalina, Marginulina, Frondicularia; there only occur a
considerable number of species of Bulimina., This sea alone
in the present day contains living Frondicularia; of Fron-
dicularia so varied in the white chalk; and, to complete
the approximation, it exhibits to us the only two living spe-
cies, the analogues of which are found in the fossil state in the
white chalk, namely, Dentalina communis and Rotalina um-
bilicata. This analogy of zoological forms would lead us to
believe, Ist, that the basin in which is deposited the white
chalk of Paris was subject to a warm temperature; 2nd, that
it was circumscribed, protected from waves and from every
violent current proceeding from a distance, since the bodies
398 Concluding Remarks.
are deposited there without having experienced the slightest
wearing previous to their becoming fossil; 3rd and lastly,
that it extended to the whole of the white chalk of England.
Concluding Remarks.
The preceding extracts from the labours of Dr. Ehrenberg
and M. A. d’Orbigny show that microscopic Polythalamia
are found in all calcareous formations from the lias upward ;
but in England they have been lately discovered in still deeper
strata. Mr. Tennant was, I understand, the first to announce
their discovery in 1839 in the mountain limestone of England.
In 1840 they were also met with in the Kendal limestone,
from which Mr. Lonsdale has prepared thin slices mounted
on glass, which appear transparent under a strong light, ex-
hibiting the crowded state of the microscopic Polythalamia in
great perfection. Mr. Bowerbank also has been led to turn
his attention to this subject by examining the siliceous bodies
of the chalk, green sand, and oolites*.
I had written thus far, when an interesting article by the
Rev. Dr. Buckland, in reference to the researches of Dr. Ehren-
berg up to 1839, met my eye, entitled, “On the agency of
Animalcules in the formation of Limestonet,” which notices
in particular the researches of MM. Tennant and Darker on
this subject in the Derbyshire limestone and the Stonesfield
slate, as well as the labours of Mr. Bowerbank, referred to
above, and conveying judicious reflections. Dr. Buckland
justly remarks, that in the application of the microscope
from the living to the fossil Infusoria and Foraminifers we are
commencing a new and important era in Paleontology. A
very interesting branch of the inquiry will be to ascertain
whether these microscopic bodies retain throughout a distinct-
ive character in the several formations into whose composition
they enter. In the unbounded field of nature presented to
the consideration of the Microscopical Society of London
lately established, no subject appears more worthy of their
attention than an examination of the microscopic organic con-
stituents of all the older limestone formations of the British
Isles, as well as of other countries; and it is much to be de-
sired that this attention may not be wanting, although the
concurrence of many labourers may be required to reap a
harvest of great promise, vet of indefinite extent.
* Proceedings of the Geological Society, March 11, 1840.
+ Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal, January to April, 1841.
Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 399
XLI.— Report of the Results of Researches in Physiological
Botany made in the year 1839. By F. J. Meyen, M.D.,
Professor of Botany in the University of Berlin.
[Continued from p. 177.]
2. In the Cryptogams.
M. Uneer* has published an interesting treatise on the
structure and functions of the organs of fructification of Riccia
glauca; he first notices the anatomical structure of the folia-
ceous substance, and shows that the want of stomata is made
up for by the loose conjunction of the cells on the surface
(this formation of the upper cells is particularly evident in
Riccia crystallina, Meyen). Then follows the description of
the observations of the development of both kinds of organs
of fertilization ; but the first stages of their appearance have
not been observed, because, as M. Unger says, the proper
time was already passed. The sporiferous organs (called
Pistils, Meyen) always appear in a large air-cell, and are said
to arise by the conjunction of a group of parenchymatous
cells, which during their increase and enlargement form a
cavity in their centre, which exhibited only one opening out-
wards. ‘this bottle-shaped organ lengthens its neck until it
reaches the surface of the thallus, and now the enlargement of
the lower part of the sporangium commences (which is formed
by the ovarium of the pistil). The contents of the sporan-
gium appeared first as a homogeneous, colourless, fluid mat-
ter, and as a granular substance ; this collected gradually in
the middle, and then appeared as contents of that cellular
tissue out of which the primitive cells of the spores are
formed.
It appeared also as a general fact, that at the periphery
one layer of cells produces no spores in their interiors (here
also a similar case of cells as in the formation of pollen in
the anthers of the Phanerogams, M.). In the structure of
the spores, M. Unger confirms the statement that the outer
brown skin is not composed of cells, but is only a reticulate
deposition of cellular matter.
The other organs of generation, the so-called anthers, were
not found in such great numbers; they were dispersed, and
occurred singly. ‘They are said to consist in a regular sepa-
ration of the parenchymatous cells of the thallus: here also the
contents form a granular substance, which appears in the
* Anatomische Untersuchung der Fortpflangungstheile von Riccia glauca,
Linnza, p. 1 to 17.
400 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany.
form of cells of extraordinary smallness, as in the anthers of
the Mosses.
M. Unger draws the following results from his observa-
tions :—
Ist. That the original development in Riccia glauca of both
those organs is simultaneous, and that they therefore seem
to have a nearer relation to each other. 2nd. That both
organs represent cavities formed from cellular tissue, which
are provided with lengthened openings, and that therefore a
material communication of their contents is not improbable.
3rd. That the function of the neck-shaped passage of the
sporangium is confined to the earliest period of its develop-
ment, etc., and that, finally, the transference of the contents
of the anthers to the sporangia is a cause of the formation
of spores.
M. Mohl has published some new and very fruitful obser-
vations on the development of the spores of the Jungerman-
nie: he chose for his experiments Anthoceros levis, in
which the primitive spore contains but few globules, which
renders the progress of the formation easier to follow. The
youngest primitive cells which M. Mohl found appeared as
transparent, partly spherical cells, in which one could observe
a cell-nucleus, as in the phanerogamic plants. Afterwards a
gummy substance was formed round the dise of the nucleus,
and this finally covers more than half of it; the green
granules appear more plainly, and the mass divides into two
parts. At the edges this green mass passes into a colourless,
gummy, but fine granular substance, which forms larger or
smaller meshes; M. Mohl compares this substance very
correctly to the bladders of foam. After this divided green
mass has gradually increased, these two halves divide again
into two parts, and thus four nuclei, lying close to each
other, are formed (grain-cells, M. Mohl calls them), in which
change the true cell-nucleus takes no part, but hes separated
by itself. At the same time the side of the primitive cells
thickens, and adopts the form of the well-known mucous
substance, and now follows the division of its cavity. Lines
are formed on the inner surface of the primitive cell, which
are correctly represented as projecting edges, which after-
wards grow towards the middle of the cell between two
masses of granules, and join together. After this division,
nothing is visible of the nucleus. A short time after the
division of the primitive cell, the formation of the spore-cuti-
cle commences, namely, in each of the four compartments,
and the granular masses lie in the interior of each of these
new-formed cells, and are fastened by threads of gum to the
Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 401
circumference of the spore-cuticle. The remaining observa-
tions agree with the results of former ones, and are already
known. A series of excellent delineations accompanies the
paper. M. Mohl then proceeds to compare his view of the
formation of the spores with that of M. de Mirbel. Accord-
ing to the view of the latter, the formation of the spores
depends principally on the primitive cell, for the contents
are divided mechanically into four parts by the projecting
partitions. According to M. Mohl’s earlier idea, the develop-
ment of four spores in a primitive cell depends solely on
the organic change of the contents; but his late observations
on Anthoceros appear to support an intermediate view, for the
development of the partitions is produced by that of the con-
tents of the primitive cell. Finally, M. Mohl endeavours to
show that no great importance must be attributed to the cir-
cumstance of the four divisions of the primitive cell communi-
cating with each other or not, and that we must not consider
this process as a characteristic distinction between the primi-
tive cells of the spores and those of the pollen-grains. In An-
thoceros levis M. Mohl could not observe this division; in
Anth. punctatus he thinks he saw it, and also in Jungermannia
epiphylla, but not in Riccia glauca. I have published the re-
sults of some new observations on the formation of the spores
of Aneura pinguis, which may be regarded as a sequel to those
spoken of in the third volume of my ‘ Physiology’ (Berlin,
1839). In the first stages of the fruit there were found only
very tender long cells, which were imbedded in a gummy
matter ; these cells enlarged, and at length lay close to each
other, and at a later period it was seen that from these at
first perfectly homogeneous cells, not only the elaters, but
also the spores, were formed ; some become elaters, and
others undergo a series of changes, until at length the spores
are produced. The cell out of whose division four spores
are always produced, I have called primitive spore (Mutter-
spore), and of these primitive spores, three, four, or even five
are formed in each tubular cell; whilst those neighbouring
cells which afterwards produce the formation-tunic retain
their granular contents unchanged, until the spores are per-
fectly developed. As soon as the primitive spores are formed,
a gelatinous membrane appears at their periphery; this has
been called primitive cell ; I designate it as formation-tunic or
skin (Bildungsbriille). Some time afterwards I observed two,
three, or even four primitive spores enclosed in their forma-
tion-tunics, connected with each other in a row, and occupy-
ing the place of the original tubular cell, but from want of
material I could not determine whether these formation-
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2D
402 Meyen’s Report for 1839 an Physiological Botany.
tunics were derived from the single members into which the
primitive tubular cell may by transverse division be dissolved,
or whether, as appeared in some cases, the primitive spores
with their coverings make their appearance within the tubu-
lar cell, whose sides are then absorbed. The drawings ac-
companying the article will make this clearer. Sometimes
only a part of the tube is changed into primitive spores, etc.,
and the rest remains undeveloped in one of the primitive cells
of its own tube, by which the appearance of stalks sometimes
seen on the single primitive cells is explained: as the primi-
tive cell is absorbed, they also disappear. In several fruits of
Aneura pinguis 1 was able to observe, at the time when
the division of the primitive spore by the contraction of the
sides takes place, the existence of a second formation-tunic
(it was not the inner surface of the outer one), but neither of
them took any part in the division of the spore, as is seen in
the delineations. However, last winter I observed that they
did take part in the division of the spores in individuals of
Aneura pinguis (the large turf variety), inasmuch as the gela-
tinous membrane entered into the contractions of the mem-
branes of the primitive spores, but was never completely
separated, as is the case with Pe/lia epiphylla. Whether in
Aneura the formation of nuclei precedes the division of the
primitive spore into four others cannvut be observed, inas-
much as these cells are filled with a green matter which pre-
vents our seeing the internal process: I have also not been
able to observe it in Pellia epiphylia, Sphagnum palustre, ete.
Directly after the production of the spore by division, each
one exhibited a peculiar formation-tunic, just the same as
the pollen-grains ; at a later period both the common forma-
tion-coverings, as also the special ones, are absorbed, and
then the spores lie singly between the tubular cells, which at
this time change into elaters *.
In the past year M. Klotzsch has described a series of
Fungi, and accompanied his descriptions with excellent de-
lineations+; in this work (to plate 473) we have a division of
the Hymenomycete according to the new observations on the
structure of the hymenium. ‘The Hymenomycete may be
divided into two groups: Exospore, with free stalked spores,
and Entospore, with enclosed unstalked spores. The first
division is resolved into the Tetrasporidei, where the straight
* The plant used for the above observations was the so-called 7richo-
stylium arenarium ; but I have convinced myself that Corda’s genus Tricho-
stylium is the same as Aneura, for the small column which occurs in 7'7i-
chostylium also belongs to Aneura.
+ Aeb. Dietrichs Florades Konigreichs Preussen, vii., Berlin, 1839, tab.
457-476.
Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 403
spores are developed in fours, and only by way of exception
in twos, threes and sixes; and the Monosporidei, where the
long bent spores are always developed singly on spike-formed
supports: the genus Hnidia belongs to this group.
Interesting is the information that many tuberose Fungi,
as, for instance, the genera Gauteria, Vallad., Hydnangium,
Wallr., and Hymenangium, Kl. (Tuber album, Bull.), belong
to the true Hymenomycete, and indeed to the Exospore ; in
these Fungi the hymenium covers the surface of the cavities
which are found in their fleshy substance.
In describing the Moschelia esculenta, M. Klotzsch calls
the paraphyses of authors anthers; and of Spherosoma
( fuscescens) he says, that the anthers, when they appear in the
Octosporidei, always project above the surface of the tube-
skin (Schlauchkant), and therefore he does not reckon the
paraphyses of Spherosoma fuscescens (plate 464) as an-
thers, iasmuch as they do not project above the surface.
I must here call to mind Carus’s notice of a difference of
gender in Pyronema Marianum, where the yellow colour of
the whole surface of the fungus is derived from the con-
tents of the paraphysz, or anther-like organs.
Dr. Redmann Coxe has sent to the Linnzan Society his
‘Observations on some Fungi or Agarici*, which by deli-
quescence forms an inky fluid, drying into a bistre- coloured
mass, capable of being used as a water-colour for drawings,
and of a very indestructible nature, by means of common
agencies.
M. Morren+ has communicated some observations on the
structure and colouring of Agaricus epixylon, DeC. As re-
gards the colour, he says that the colouring substance is
formed quite differently in Fungi to what it is in other
plants ; in the above-mentioned Agaricus the blue colour of
the pileus is produced by a few spherical globules contained
in the tubes of the tissue. These globules are not changed
by iodine. In the deeper-seated layers of cells the globules
are less numerous, and in the tubes of the white flesh of the
mushroom they are not to be found. The tissue of the above-
mentioned fungus is said to consist solely of anastomosing
vessels, which have sometimes nodular swellings, and are ge-
nerally forked, but seldom triramified : these vessels are long,
cylindrical, anastomosing tubes; they contain a fluid and
globules, and have here and there partitions. The tubes are
of great length, and form a woolly tissue, and cannot there-
* Annals of Natural History, June 1839, p. 258.
+ Notice sur lhistologie de l’Agaricus epixylon. Bulletin de l’Académie
Royale de Bruxelles, vi. No. 1.
2D2
404 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany.
fore be reckoned to the parenchym; they appear most similar
to the lacteous vessels, and form a true vascular tissue. One
might place this fungous tissue together with the lacteous
vessels (to which M. Morren has given the name of Cinen-
chyme, xivnzvs); but as it differs from these in the want of
the circulation, as well as in its woolly interwoven appear-
ance, M. Morren has called it Dadalenchyme.
I cannot agree with M. Morren’s views of the nature of
the fungous tissue: I consider it as cellular tissue, and have
already described it (Phytotomy, 30, p. 138) as a peculiar
form of irregular cellular tissue under the name of Felt-
tissue. The cells are often long and branched, but the par-
titions which change these tubes into cells cannot be over-
looked. Several kinds of regular cellular tissue are found in
Fungi. M. Morren observed a spontaneous motion in the
spores of Agaricus epixylon as soon as put into water. [This
motion has however been already observed, and has been
seen even in dry fungus-spores.—Meyen. |
In the foregoing Reports we have often made mention of a
fungus formation which of late years has attracted so much
attention, viz. Fermentation fungus: I have often attempted
to prove that it is improbable that this fungus should be
the cause of fermentation, although always found in ferment-
ing liquids; but the fact of their being plants appears, to me
at least, to have been fully proved by the observations on
their increase and growth. However, M. Liebig*, in a trea-
tise on Fermentation, etc., has declared those statements of
the vegetable nature of the fermentation formations to be a
delusion; and considers that gluten and albumen, which,
during the fermentation of beer and vegetable saps, are sepa-
rated in a changed state, appear in the form of globules,
which swim about either singly or several together, and
that these globules have been mistaken by natural philoso-
phers for Infusoriz and Fungi. Indeed, says Liebig, the
idea that they are animals or plants disproves itself, for in
pure sugar-water the seeds of the plants disappear during
fermentation ; the fermentation takes place without the ap-
pearance of a development or reproduction of the seeds, plants
or animals which have been regarded by philosophers as the
cause of the chemical process.
I am not aware upon whose observations Liebig grounds
these latter statements ; probably they are his own, which,
however, must evidently give way to the more correct ones
of his predecessors.
* Uber Gahrung Faulniss und Verwesungund ihre Ursachen. Annalen
der Pharmacie, 1539.
Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 405
M. Balsamo Crivelli has published some new observa-
tions on the origin and development of Botrytis Bassiana*,
and of another parasitic kind of mould, a subject which was
treated of in our Report for 1836 (Berlin, 1837, p.107). M.
_ Crivelli found that the vesicles of which the fat consists can
pass into Botrytis, and he convinced himself that the “ corps
vésiculaires” of M. Audouin were nothing more than swim-
ming fat globules. A cut was made in the side of a fat
caterpillar, and the exuding sap exhibited the supposed vesi-
cular bodies of Audouin, which were certainly nothing but
globules of fat. The following morning the interior of the
caterpillar was covered with Ascophora mucedo. The spores
of Ascophora were introduced into the bodies of four chry-
salises, and three days afterwards the grains of fat could be
seen full of vegetating filaments. Finally, M. Crivelli re-
tains his idea, that in the fat of the silkworm there can take
place such changes as to render its component parts capable
of spontaneously producing mould, which property the fat
may then impart to healthy caterpillars.
M. Turpint+ explains why butter which has been melted
and allowed to cool becomes so seldom mouldy: the treatise
is of great length, for he mentions a number of cases in which
mouldiness was observed without being able to assume that
the seeds proceeded from the air; also the microscopical
structure of butter, both before and after its fusion, is most
circumstantially described. The following points may be
mentioned : the mould which, in common butter, is produced
from the lacteous globules contained therein cannot be pro-
duced in melted butter, because these globules are then
covered with the oil of butter. M. Turpin remarks, that the
explanation of the production of mould on the surface of or-
ganic matter by a continual ‘rain’ of seeds of all kinds of
mould must at present appear ridiculous; but that the ex-
planation by ‘ generatio spontanea’” must be very limited,
and also more clearly defined. Nature produces the mould
in two ways: either directly out of the globuline of organic
matter when this has ceased to be under the influence of
vitality, or from spores which it produces itself.
M. Hanover} has made ‘Observations on a Contagious
Conferva Formation on the Water Salamanders ;’ he saw the
* Communicated by Freiherr von Cesati in the Linnza of 1839, p. 118-
123.
+ Sur le singulier caractére physique et microscopique que prend le
beurre, ete. Comptes Rendus du 9 Dec., p. 748-762.
t Miiller’s Archiv fiir Anatomie, 1839, Heft 5.
406 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany.
production of Conferve on an anatomized specimen of ‘ Tri-
ton punctatus’ while under water. Similar formations were
observed on a dead salamander, a dead fly, and on the sur-
face of several wounds which were made on living salaman-
ders ; sometimes the formation took place without there
being any injury, e. g. on the toes, by which the toes attacked
were destroyed.
[The plant observed by M. Hanover is the Achlya prolifera,
Nees v. Esenbeck ; and if, as M. H. says, M. Carus’s figures
do not agree with his plants, perhaps those will which I gave
to Gothe’s § Mittheilunger aus der Pflangenwelt’ (S. Nova
Acta Acad. C. L. C. tom. xv. pt. ii. p. 374, etc. tab. i. xxix.),
and in other places. I have seen this fungus under similar
circumstances on flies, spiders, earthworms, Planariz, dead
frogs, and even on putrifying Viscum album ; and have shown,
in Wiegmann’s Archiv, etc., 1835, ii. p. 354, that the little
fungus which is formed about autumn on the body of the
common house-fly has spores which germinate, and in water
grow out into Achlya prolifera. The seed-formation and the
germination of the Ach/lya spores were observed and repre-
sented in the above plate, as also in my ‘ Physiology,’ 1. tab.
x. fig. 18 and 19.—Meyen. |
M. Hanover inoculated the above plant on the back of a
healthy animal, and saw that the formation of Conferve had
commenced at the end of sixteen hours, but fell off with the
epidermis. The experiments were frequently repeated, but
it was always found that the development of the plant was
not injurious to the life of the animal. Moreover, M. H. re-
marked that the inoculation succeeded better with unripe
than with ripe Conferve.
As I have occupied myself very considerably with this
subject, I may be allowed to mention my observations with-
out prejudice.
The moculation effected by M. Hanover is nothing more
than a common propagation ; the ripe plants afforded seeds,
out of which other plants were produced, and the so-called
unripe Conferve increased their single threads, as is done by
the order Achlya among the water Fungi, and by Vaucheria
among the Conferve. The growth of the fungous threads
from the mucous surface of the Trifonie cannot be injurious ;
they grow like mould from dispersed spores. But just as the
lower moulds are produced not only from spores, but also in
a manner as yet unknown to us, so it is the case with Achlya
prolifera and the Isarie; they are moulds, which are de-
veloped as a product of a sickly state of the animal; the
disease itself is deep-seated, for the animals generally die of
Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison. 407
it. When this mould is once formed, it propagates itself by
spores. Such diseases are probably not rare, and only of im-
portance to the animals. I have lately observed a disease
of the Vibrio, out of whose body a very beautiful but small
microscopical mould was developed, from which they died ;
the animals twist themselves in all directions, and try to get
rid of the diseased product, but in vain; at length they be-
come quiet and die.
[To be continued. ]
XLII.—On the Urari, the Arrow Poison of the Indians of
Guiana; with a description of the Plant from which ié is
extracted. By Rosert H. ScuompBurek, Esq.*.
More than two centuries have elapsed since the curiosity of
Europe was raised to become acquainted with the plant from
the juice of which the Indians make their celebrated Urari
poison ; and as the preparation has been enveloped in great
mystery, all the attempts hitherto made have only added con-
siderably to the wish of the learned in Kurope to be able to
sift the true from the fabulous accounts.
Raleigh appears to have been the first who heard of this
substance, with which the Aborigines poisoned their arrows
for war and the chase; and Father Gumilla observes, that
“its principal ingredient was furnished by a subterraneous
plant, a tuberose root, which never puts forth leaves, and
which is called the root by way of eminence, raiz de si misma ;
that the pernicious exhalations which arise from the pots
cause the old women to perish who are chosen to watch over
this operation ; finally, that these vegetable juices never are
considered as sufficiently concentrated till a few drops pro-
duce at adistance a repulsive action on the blood. An Indian
wounds himself slightly, and a dart dipped in the liquid Cu-
rare is held near the wound ; if it makes the blood return to
the vessels without having been ‘brought into contact with
them, the poison is judged to be sufficiently concentrated.”
Not less eccentric are the accounts which we receive from
Hartzinck+, who was informed that, in order to try whether
the poison be good, a poisoned arrow is shot into a young
tree ; if the tree shed its leaves in the course of three days
the poison is considered strong enough. He observes further,
that in the last rebellion of the Negroes in Berbice, a woman
* Communicated by the Author.
+ Beschryving van Guiana, door J. J. Hartzinck, ete. Amsterdam, 1770,
vol. i. p. 13.
408 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison,
who carried her child on her back was shot with a poisoned
arrow, and though the child was not wounded, it began to
swell, and died a short time after.
At the commencement of the 19th century Baron de Hum-
boldt gave an authentic account of the preparation of that
poison and its effects ; but later travellers, not contented with
the simple method of its preparation, covered it anew with
the veil of mystery, and it was thought that “the vegetable
extract was merely the medium through which the poison is
conveyed—the common Wooraly owing its poisonous quality
to the infusion of the large ants, called Muneery, and the
stronger kind from the fangs of venomous reptiles, particu-
larly the Coony Coochy, which is the most venomous of all
known snakes *.” The author of ‘ Wanderings in South Ame-
rica, Mr. Charles Waterton, gives a similar account of its
preparation. He says, “a day or two before the Macoushi
Indian prepares his poison, he goes into the forest in quest of
the ingredients. A vine grows in these wilds, which is called
Wourali. It is from this that the poison takes its name, and
it is the principal ingredient. When he has procured enough
of this, he digs up a root of a very bitter taste, ties them to-
gether, and then looks about for two kinds of bulbous plants,
which contain a green and gelatinous juice. He fills a little
quake which he carries on his back with the stalks of this,
and lastly ranges up and down till he finds two species of
ants. One of them is very large and black, and so venomous
that its sting produces a fever: it is most commonly to be
met with on the ground. The other is a little red ant which
stings like a nettle, and has its nest under the leaf of a shrub.
After obtaining these, he has no more need to range the forest.
A quantity of the strongest Indian pepper is used, but this he
has already planted round his hut. The pounded fangs of the
Labarri Snake, and those of the Conna Couchi, are likewise
added. ‘These he commonly has in store; for when he kills
a snake, he generally extracts the fangs, and keeps them by
him}+.” This is the adorned story of the ingredients for the
preparation of the Urari, and rests upon the fictitious accounts
which these travellers may have received, but surely not upon
personal experience.
These various accounts, so contradictory as regards the
mode of preparation and the origin of the poison, were well
calculated to raise in me the desire of removing the mystery
connected with it; and I was fortunate enough to accomplish
my wish during my first expedition in the interior of British
* Montgomery Martin’s ‘ History of the British Colonies,’ vol. ii. p. 47.
+ ‘Wanderings in South America,’ by Charles Waterton, Esq., p. 55.
and the Plant from which it is extracted. 409
Guiana. I collected at Pirara, the largest Macusi village I
ever visited, every information on the subject, and the result
was, that the plant grew on the Conocon or Canuku moun-
tains. On our return from the cataract of the Rupununi, I
ascertained at a settlement of Wapisiana Indians on the east-
ern bank of the Rupununi, in 3° north latitude, that a journey
of one day and a half would bring me there.
After I had engaged some guides, I started, accompanied
by Lieut. Haining of the 65th Regiment, in the morning of
the 25th of December, in search of the mysterious plant.
Our way led us first to the south, over pathless savannahs,
until we met with a place in the Rupununi where we could
ford it. As the mountains stretched their foot to the river’s
bank, we expected that the ascent would immediately com-
mence. Our guide, however, led us through a mountain-pass,
and before us was a large arid savannah. We turned now to
the north, meeting with plains covered with wood, or low
shrubs and coarse grass, bounded on both sides by the moun-
tains; it was a wild road, crossed frequently by streams,
some of which were dried up and others ran turbulently over
numerous rocks: their banks were clothed with creepers and
twiners, of the extensive families of Convolvulacee, Bignoni-
acee and Eupatorie: a beautiful reed raised its panicle high
above the creeping plants; it was the Gynerium saccharoides,
which the Indians use for their arrows.
At last, after we had walked more than five miles, the ex-
tent of the valley from the place where we entered it, the
ascent commenced. It was by no means an easy matter: the
path, Indian-like, quite narrow, led over fallen trees, between
boulders of granite, and was often so steep that we had to use
hands and feet. I wondered only how the Indians, with their
burthens, could climb up. Mountain-streams had made their
way over shelves of granite, forming frequent cascades, which
during the rainy season must be grand indeed; at present,
the water only trickled down the rugged sides, and was lost
among numerous plants of the genera Pothos, Heliconia, Ges-
neria, Peperoma and Canna, which, favoured by the moisture,
grew most luxuriantly. A Justicia with scarlet flowers, the
beautiful Petrea macrostachya (8.), and the Duranta with
its violet blossoms, added considerably to the beauty of the
spot.
SAS three o’clock in the afternoon, after a most fatiguing
march of eight hours and a half, we reached a few huts on
Mount Mamesua, inhabited by Wapisianas, where we in-
tended to rest for the night. We continued our inquiries,
and learned from our host Oronappi, an old acquaintance,
410 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison,
whom we had met a few weeks ago in the valley, that he him-
self knew how to prepare the poison, and that he would wil-
lingly accompany our guide and bring the plant for our in-
spection.
This proposal did not agree with my plans. I was anxious
to see the plant in its native growth, and when we gave him
to understand that it was our intention to accompany him, he
attempted by signs to make us desist from going with him.
He told us that the path was very bad, and that it was so far
that we could not reach the place till afternoon, and that we
would have to sleep on the road ; he repeated the same story
in the morning, and as he observed that we were determined
to insist on our first plan, he made a sour face and did not
speak for a length of time. Whether he thought that we were
not able to stand the fatigues, or whether he wished us not to
learn the place where the plant grew, I know not: enough
of his stories—we found the first only true; the path was
wretched; all traces of it were frequently lost, and an Indian
only could have guided us; and he directed his course mostly
by broken branches, or marks cut in the trees, sometimes
standing still for some moments to consider in which direction
to turn.
Our path was over “hill and dale,” mostly in a N.N.W.
and N.W. direction. It became every moment wilder: we
had to cross several mountain-streams, which flowed in deep
beds, precipitating at their banks a ferruginous matter ;
underbush became scarce ; it appeared as if Nature here de-
lighted only in gigantic forms. Our Indians thought they
had mistaken the track; but as we arrived at a stream which
ran rapidly over the sloping ground, exhibiting granitic shelves,
we observed that several paths united ; and crossing the brook
our guides stopped, and pointing to a ligneous twimer which
wound itself snake-like from tree to tree, they called out
“ Urari,” the name of the plant in the tongue of our guides*.
* Sir Walter Raleigh, in his table of names, rivers, ete. discovered in his
second Guiana Voyage (Hakeluyt’s Voyages, ii. 692), mentions even then,
among the poisons used by the Indians of the Crinoco, the Ourari; and by
that name it is almost exclusively called by the Indians of Guiana. The
Caribs in pronouncing the 7 frequently exchange this letter with /, and it may
thus have happened that the name Wurali has crept in. The Macusis, who
are acknowledged to be the best manufacturers of this remarkable substance,
call it decidedly Urari. The same name it bears among the Tarumas, Wa-
pisianas, Aricunas, Woyawais, Atorais, and various other tribes of the in-
terior whom I have visited. ‘The substitution of the corrupted name Wou-
rali is therefore, to say the least of it, gratuitous, and ought to be rejected.
Von Martius and Von Spix, in their ‘ Travels in Brazil,’ observe that, during
their exploring tours up the Amazon, Yupura, Rio Negro, etc., they heard
it pronounced Urari, but never Wurali. (See Reise in Brasilien Miinchen,
and the Plant from which it is extracted. 411
My wish was thus realized ; and that plant which Baron de
Humboldt was prevented from seeing, and which was one of
the chief objects of Mr.Waterton’s ‘ Wanderings,’ but without
success, I now saw before me. Baron de Humboldt, with his
usual sagacity, observes, “ The danger of the Curare, as of
most other Strychnee (for we continue to believe that the
Mavacure belongs to a neighbouring family), results only from
the action of the poison on the vascular system *.”
Though I did not find the plant in flower, it was bearing
fruit, and their inspection assured me that, as Von Humboldt
suspected, the plant belongs to the genus Strychnost+. It
forms No. 155 of my Guiana plants, and is thus characterized
by Mr. Bentham :—“ Strychnos toxifera, Schomb., Hook. Ic.
Pl. t. 364 and 365 ; ramis scandentibus cirrhisque pilis longis
patentibus rufis dense obtectis, foliis sessilibus ovali-oblongis
acuminatis membranaceis trinerviis utrinque pilis longis rufis
hirsatis, floribus...... fructibus maximis globosis.—Folia
3—4-pollicaria.”
The Strychnos toxifera, as I have called it, the Urari of the
Macusi and Wapisiana Indians, is a native of South America,
and a sporadic plant; and, as far as known to us, has been
hitherto found only in the granitic mountains of Canuku or
Conocon, in latitude 3° 10’ N., a group of mountains which
border the extensive savannahs of the rivers Rupununi, Mahu
and Takutu. It is a ligneous twiner: at its root, of the thick-
ness of a man’s arm, and covered with a rough ash-coloured
bark, marked with fissures; winding itself to the neighbour-
1831, vol. iii. p. 1155.) The compound terms Uraricapara and Uraricuera
(Parima), two rivers, the former the tributary of the latter, and which we find
under these names in the oldest maps we possess of these regions, is another
argument in favour of Urari. The arrow poison is generally known in En-
gland under the name ef Wouraly, a name by which Mr. Waterton, in his
‘ Wanderings,’ has described it ; but interesting as his description may prove
to the general reader, and however delightful the picture he draws of his
various exploits, it is a work which never will be consulted as authority in
scientific questions.
* Personal Narrative, vol. v. part il. p. 527.
+ The chief ingredient of the arrow poison of the Indians of the Yuppura
is, according to Von Martius, the bark of a slender tree, which, in the T upi
tongue, is called Urari-iwa, the Ronhamon gujanensis of Aublet. A plant
which forms one of the ingredients in the preparation of the Macusi poison,
and which, in many respects, agrees with Aublet’s figure, has been named
by Mr. Bentham, in the enumeration of my Guiana plants, Strychnos cogens.
However, the Urari plant of the Macusis, although belonging to the same
genus, differs in numerous specific points. (Compare Yon Martius, Reise in
Brasilien, vol. iii. p. 1237.) I have little doubt, that the plant of which the
Indians by Esmeralda prepare their poison, is Aublet’s Ronhkamon, and in
this I am confirmed by a conversation with Dr. Kunth in Berlin, who, as is
well known, determined Von Humboldt’s plants.
412. Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison,
ing trees, and reaches often a height of thirty to forty feet be-
fore it divides into branches. The latter are rounded and op-
posite, the branchlets densely covered with ferruginous hair.
Between the branches and lkewise between the leaves there
appear spiral tendrils, mostly single, but sometimes divided.
The branchlets prove sometimes abortive on one side, and are
then replaced by the cirrhus, which in that case becomes leaf-
bearing. Organs of a peculiar structure, apparently gem-
mulze, are found below the base of the branchlets as well as
on the branch itself; on the outside they are closely set with
hair, on the inside smooth and coriaceous and of a spatulate
form. They are not peculiar to every branch, but mostly to
be found on the branchlet by which it is terminated. The
leaves are opposite, ovate-oblong, acuminate, short-petioled,
entire, three to five-nerved, ciliate, membranaceous, and co-
vered with ferruginous hair, which is thicker set between each
pair of petioles; the leaves differ in size from one inch and a
half to four inches and a half, and are from one to two inches
broad, the stalk being only two lines.
As already observed, the plant was not in flower in Decem-
ber, and had just begun to drop its fruit, which were on long
stalks ; and the rudiments of a five-cleft calyx and an inferior
corolla were easily perceptible.
The fruit is a berry of the size of a large apple, being fre-
quently twelve inches in circumference; it is globular, and
covered with a smooth hard rind of a bluish green colour and
filled with a soft jelly-like pulp, in which the seeds, ten to
fifteen in number, are immersed. They are round, concavo-
convex, about an inch in diameter, and five to six lines thick ;
from the circumference five rays extend towards the promi-
nence in the middle. They are of a grey colour and rough;
the internal kernel is a yellowish white, and tough, like horn.
This substance, according to Indian information, possesses
intense bitter and medicinal properties ; it is used by the In-
dians against pain in the stomach, dysentery, and as a tonic.
We observed many heaps of the cut wood covered with
palm-leaves, which we were told had been left by the Macusis,
who come to this place from a great distance, as the plant is
known to grow only in two or three situations at the Canuku
mountains ; they are therefore resorted to by the Indians from
all quarters.
The Wapisianas and Macusis are generally acknowledged
to be the best manufacturers of the poison; and from the
corroborative testimony of these tribes, I have gathered the
following particulars respecting its preparation.
It is only the bark of the woody parts and its alburnum
and the Plant from which it is extracted. 413
which are considered to possess the poisonous principle in
the highest degree. The stem of the plant is therefore cut
into pieces about three feet in length, of which the bark is
stripped, and after having been pounded it is steeped in water,
for which purpose a new earthen vessel is used; here they
allow it to remain for some time, well covered, until the water
is of a yellowish colour, when it is filtered through a funnel-
shaped matappa lined with plantain-leaves. Several other
plants have been meanwhile procured, and after their juice
has been extracted in a similar manner, this extract is kept
ready to be added to the former at the moment it has been
concentrated on a slow fire to the consistency of a syrup.
The addition of that juice gives a darker colour to the Urari,
which, from the time of its becoming concentrated, has the
appearance of tar: it is now put into small calabashes, which
are covered with leaves to prevent the poison from coming in
immediate contact with the air. The Indians pretend, that if
it be well preserved it will keep its strength for a couple of
years. If it is to be used, the quantity required is put into
a separate calabash, and a little juice of the Cassada is added
to it to make it more pliable. I was told that the addition of
Cassada-water (as the expressed juice of the poisonous root of
the Jatropha manihot is termed) reawakens the slumbering
powers of the poison. After that juice has been added to it,
the Indian buries the calabash with the poison for a day or
two under ground.
This is the unadorned account of the preparation of the
Urari, and the method which is followed by the Macusis at
and about Pirara, and the Wapisianas of the Canuku moun-
tains, where the plant grows. There appears to be no danger
whatever in the preparation, and the vapours which are dis-
engaged are entirely innocent; but the circumstance that it
requires several days to watch the pot closely on the fire and
to take off the scum, etc. before it is properly concentrated,
as well as the superstitious customs with which the poison-
maker, for his own advantage, surrounds the preparation of
it, prevent the Indian, with his natural indolence, from
making it more than once or twice a year.
I undertook in 1837 another expedition in the interior of
Guiana, and found opportunity to revisit the regions which,
in consequence of the arrow poison, had been previously of
interest tome. That interest had not been abated—nay, it
was increased. The belief continued to prevail among the
colonists of Demerara, that the active poison of the Urari
was “snake-teeth and stinging ants ;’ and my assertions,
that the vegetable juice of the plant employed produced the
414 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison,
fatal effect, and that it contained no animal principle, were
doubted. It became evident that the more mysterious ac-
counts of former authors had taken too firm a root to give
my plain tale a chance of finding credit. It was certainly
true I had not been present at the time of preparation, and
although in my own mind I doubted not the Indian’s informa-
tion, I could not implant that faith into others. During our
stay in Pirara, a Macusi village on the classical soil of
Raleigh’s and Keymis’s El Dorado, I ascertained that an
Indian lived in the vicinity, who was far-famed for the pre-
paration of the Urari poison. I induced him by presents of
some consideration to prepare it in my presence, and he pro-
mised to do so. I accompanied him for that purpose to the
Canuku mountains, partly with the object of being present at
the gathering of the chief ingredient, and partly to see whether
I might be fortunate enough to find the plant which is called
Urari in blossom. In the latter object I was disappointed :
I found it again, as during my first visit, fruit-bearing.
The mountain Ilamickipang had been named as the place
nearest to Pirara where the plant grew, being about eighteen
miles distant in a south-eastern direction from the spot where
we collected it in 1835. We ascended the mountain for
about 1500 feet, and though we observed numerous Urari
plants at a less height, our sapient chemist, after having tried
different pieces of the stem, pronounced it not to be in a state
fit for preparation. After we had reached a saddle of the
mountain, a spot was selected, where, with the assistance of
our Indians, we built a hut of palm-leaves, and from hence
short excursions in different directions were undertaken, to
collect such plants as possessed the sap in a high degree.
They were found generally in rocky places or glens, among
heaped-up boulders of granite, places well selected by a plant
which is so fatal in its effects. The branches and ligneous
stems, which were in thickness less than the human wrist,
were chosen and carried into the hut, where they were scraped,
and the bark was preserved in small baskets made for that
purpose. Three such baskets were filled, when our chemist
considered that he had enough, and the baskets were delivered
up to me, and we returned to Pirara. The manufacturing of
the poison was however delayed for some days, for the object,
as I was told by the chemist, of observing previously a rigid
fast, in order to prepare himself for the important business.
Meanwhile Kanaima, an influential Macusi chief from the
Rupununi, arrived on a visit in Pirara, and for what purpose
I know not: it is enough to state, that he knew how to pre-
vail so far upon the manufacturer of the poison that he re-
and the Plant from which it is extracted. 415
tracted his promise, and refused to prepare it in my presence.
However, the bark was in my keeping, and as I had paid for
it, I considered myself to have a full right to it ; and although
he demanded it back, it was now my turn to refuse him.
We were at that period so near our departure for Fort San
Joaquim, that I was prevented from engaging a more willing
concocter, and with the pure bark in my possession we de-
parted.
The dreary “ winter season,” as the time when the tropical
rains descend in torrents is calied by the Brazilians, gave me
sufficient leisure to enter into further inquiries with regard to
this poison, and I resolved to make some experiments how
far the pure bark of the Urari plant, Strychnos toxifera, un-
mixed with any other substance, might prove fatal to animal
life. I took, therefore, two pounds of the bark shavings, and
having poured a gallon of water on it, allowed it to remain in
that state for twenty-four hours. Half of it was filtered off,
and keeping a steady but gentle coal fire, it was boiled in a
new pot, adding from time to time more of the infusion.
After having concentrated it by boiling to the consistence of
thin syrup, and having allowed it to cool, two arrows were
poisoned with this substance, and two fowls wounded, one in
the thigh and the other in the neck. The effects became
apparent after five minutes: the first died in twenty-seven
minutes after the wound had been inflicted; and the latter,
which had been wounded in the neck, after twenty-eight
minutes. The gentleman who accompanied me on my expe-
dition, and Senhor Pedro Ayres, who had been sent by the
commander of the district to welcome us at the Brazilian
boundary, were present during these experiments, and it is
therefore established beyond doubt, that the Urari plant alone,
without any assistance of Indian charlatanism, or the addition
of extraneous substances not likely to add to its efficacy, pro-
duces the fatal effect. The boiling process was finished in
less than seven hours, while the Indians employ more than
forty-eight hours for that purpose ; and as it required a period
rather longer to produce death in the fowls wounded with it
than would have been necessary with good Macusi poison,
this must be ascribed to our decoction being not sufficiently
concentrated. The poison which I had thus prepared was of
a brownish colour: good Macusi poison is jet-black, and I
have no doubt that it receives this appearance from one of the
ingredients which the Indians add to it.
When I left Pirara, foiled in my purpose to see the poison
prepared by the Macusi, I arranged with the Rev. Thomas
Yond, who laboured then as missionary of the episcopalian
416 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison,
church in that village, to try if he could induce any of the
famed poison-makers to boil it in his presence; and although,
on my return to Pirara in 1839, I had at last an opportunity
of witnessing the preparation of the poison by my former re-
creant Macusi, I nevertheless prefer inserting here Mr. Yond’s
letter, as it is an additional evidence for henceforth rejecting
“ snake-teeth, stinging ants,” etc. as component parts of the
Urari poison.
‘To Robert H. Schomburgk, Esq.
“ Pirara, 4th October, 1838.
“My Dear Sir,
« Knowing as I do that your object in visiting these wilds is that
of making general research, for the information and benefit of society
at large, I take the present opportunity of presenting you with the
promised statement of the manner how, and the ingredients from
which, the much-famed Urary poison is made, of which there has
been so much conjecture and erroneous accounts given in time past.
«« Since the time that I have come to reside amongst the Macusi
Indians as missionary, curiosity has led me to go to a little expense
in procuring one of the Indians from the Canuku mountains, who is
noted for his being able to make powerful poison, whom I prevailed
upon to boil a quantity before me at the Mission House. I was
fortunate enough in purchasing a quake or basket of Urary bark, as
also a quantity of Arimaru, Tarireng, and Tararemu; the rest my
Urary-maker procured in the space of three days. The ingredients
being already procured, the next movement in course was the erect-
ing of my tent, and enclosing three parts of it round with palm-
leaves, which for the time being was called the Indians’ Urary House.
This temporary house was erected in the front enclosure, opposite
the door, that I might see every movement. A buck-pot*, that would
hold a little more than a gallon, and that had never been used, was
then brought, as also four shallow plates: the first was to boil the
ingredients in, and the others to expose the Urary liquid to the sun
when boiled, in order to reduce it to a jelly.
«One large gooby}, stopped at the mouth or stall-end with loose
cotton, was opened at the head-end sufficiently wide for admitting
the contents of the Urary-pot through when poured out. A second
small gooby was made, in the shape of a funnel, and stopped with
silk grass, in order to pour the Urary through when moving it from
one drying-plate to the other, that the scum which rises on the top
during the time of drying might be kept back. The last receptacle
is a small calabash{, that will hold half a pint, into which the whole
* The earthen pots in which the Indians prepare their food, and which
they manufacture themselves, are called in the colony buck-pots, buck being
among the colonists a cognomen for Indian.—S.
+ Gooby, the fruit of a species of pumpkin, which, after having been
scoured out, is used in lieu of a flask.—S.
t The bowls prepared of the fruit of the Crescentia cujete, or calabash-
tree.—S.
and the Plant from wiich it is extracted. 417
of the Urary is poured by degrees through the small funnel, after it
has been brought to the consistency of thin starch. As soon as all
things were set in order, and the wood split up in readiness for
making the fire, the man set off in search of I could not conceive
what, and therefore I asked one standing near me why the man had
gone away. He said, ‘ He is gone to fetch his tinder-box, to make
fire, for he will not take a light from any person’s fire; you will see
he will make his own.’ I waited awhile, and then he came with a
tinder-box and steel in his hand. I looked at the box and tinder,
to see if there was anything remarkable in it, but found it to be
simply a roll of loose cotton wound round with thread, about an
inch in diameter, and seven in length, having for its case a piece of
bamboo of the same length, which aids in protecting the cotton from
getting damp, and also serves as an extinguisher to the burning
tinder when put downwards in the bamboo-case. Mulatto then took
his red flint-stone, such as the Indians commonly use, which is found
in some of the distant mountains, and seems. to be just as good
as our flint-stone at home for such a purpose*, and struck several
times, but the cotton having by some means got rather damp, he
could not succeed in getting a light: he then went to my kitchen
and lighted his cotton-roller. Now I thought I should find that he
would make his fire from this burning tinder, that had certainly got
its spark from my kitchen fire; but no, instead of this he pushed it
into his bamboo extinguisher, and let it remain there until every
spark was put out. He then struck a light from his own flint, and
so began making a fire. Other fire than that made by the Urary-
maker is not allowed to come under the roof of the Urary-house, lest
the whole should be defiled. Neither may any water be used in
drawing or cooking the Urary but that which is procured by the
Urary-maker, and even that must not be put in any vessel, save his
own sacred goblets.
“Mulatto began boiling the Urary about eleven on Friday the
19th of September, 1838. The ingredients used are as follows :—
rany (barks from a-vane:) te". 22) ede: em aot ibs.
Arimarn bark?, vine. + —
r (1 ay
Tarireng + —
Yakkee . rae
Wokarimo . Beles Bree lee ton0 | Ot os: Sri ia + —
Tararemu $ oz., from the root of the Tarireng vine 4 oz.
Muramu§, a bulbous root, not boiled, but soaked
in the half-cooked Urary, and the slime is
squeezed from it, to congealthe whole . . 14 fb.
Manuca||, the bark of a large tree, four small pieces.
* The red flint-stone here alluded to is compact quartz (jasper), which is
found in the vicinity of Mount Roraima, and along the banks of the rivers
Coko and Cukenam.—S. :
¢ Urari, or Strychnos toxifera, Schomb.—S.
t Arimaru, Sérychnos cogens, Bentham.—S.
§ Muramu, a species of Cissus. I brought some of these roots with me,
which have been planted with success at Messrs. Loddiges and sons, and at
the Botanic Garden in Berlin.—S.
|| Manuca, or Manica, an intensely bitter bark of a tree which I conceive
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2K
418 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison,
“‘ Of these, however, he had to make two separate boilings, on
account of his pot being too small to contain the quantity of bark
necessary at once, for each of which he took a day,—for the first
almost the whole of Friday, and the second the greater part of Sa-
turday. The Urary was the first ingredient that was putin the pot,
and the rest he every now and then kept adding by little and little,
until the whole was used. He kept but a slow fire during the whole
time of cooking, just sufficient to keep the liquid in a simmering
state, which seemed to suck the virtue out of the bark well. Upon
each additional handful of bark that he put in the pot during the
time of cooking, he took special care to blow, informing me that that
would give virtue to the Urary and make it strong. Of course I
did not deem that to be a proper time for giving my opinion as to
its real value or not, knowing that a little opposition would soon
make him leave his work altogether, and I should be left with
the ingredients unboiled, to muse over my own folly; I therefore
told him he was welcome to do as he pleased, my only desire beg
to see everything that was done, and that the Urary should be
strong, or painful as they term it. ‘The whole of these two days
(Friday and Saturday) had simply been to draw the poison out from
the mixed quantity of bark, so as to form the Urary liquid, which in
appearance was not unlike strong-drawn coffee. ‘The whole liquid,
consisting of a gallon and a half when first drawn, by this time had
been reduced to about a quart, which was then poured into a gooby,
the head of which had been cut out, and the tail-end stopped up
with loose cotton, sufficiently tight to stop any thick sediment from
passing through, acting as a sort of strainer, through which it passed
into a large shallow plate and the pot which he had been using, in
order to be exposed to the sun. This was on Monday morning. In
course of two or three hours after the Urary had been exposed to
the sun, I observed the powerful effect which the slime from the
bulbous root Muramu* had in perceptibly congealing the liquid to a
jelly. On Tuesday Mulatto began to pour the Urary into the more
shallow plates, where it remained still exposed to the sun, until
brought, as already stated, to the consistency of thin starch, and
was from thence removed to the last receptacle, a small calabash,
capable of containing near half a pint, to which small quantity the
whole was brought.
««This process of drying continued from Monday until Thursday
following, when Mulatto gave it over to me. Mulatto then asked
me to come and see him try its strength, informing me that the first
creature upon which it must be tried was a Tapooya (a species of
lizard found amongst the grass in the savannahs) ; for if it quickly
t» belong to the Xanthoxylacee. It is said to have the quality of salivating
when taken internally, and the inhabitants of the Rio Negro and the Amazon
use it therefore in syphilitic complaints.
It is remarkable that all the ingredients which the Macusis use for the
preparation of their poison are of an intense bitter. This may be the reason
that it is used as a tonic. I am however unacquainted with the plants
which they call Tarireng, Yakkee, and Wokarimo.—S.
* Cissus species?—S.,
and the Plant from which it is extracied. 419
kills that the Urary must be strong, because of its being hard to kill,
having but little blood. I was at a loss to know how he would catch
such a swift little creature in so awkward a spot, and how he would
find them at all; but the mystery soon was revealed, for, having taken
a torch in his hand, he set fire to the dry grass, which spread abroad.
and made the poor Tapooyas fly from their retreat, to hide in some
distant tuft of grass or brushwood, which Mulatto keenly observed,
and slily pounced upon and secured them. He then took a small
piece of wood, about the thickness of a stocking-needle, poisoned it
at the pointed end with a little of the new-made Urary, and then
stuck it in one of the hind legs of the lizard. He then let it loose,
when it ran a few yards; then, panting, lay down and died. A
second and third he pierced in the tail, upen which it had much the
same effect; they both died in a few minutes. A rat was then
brought in by one of the Indians, and its thigh was slightly pierced
with a needle-like arrow, which had such an effect upon the poor
creature as scarcely to allow it to move ten feet before it lay down
and expired. I then proposed, as I was about having a fowl killed
for dinner, to have it slightly touched with Urary on the leg: to this
Mulatto made some objection, saying he never tried his Urary on
fowls, and to do so would spoil the whole; but as I pressed it, he
said, ‘ Then let it be done.’ Mulatto then made a small arrow on
purpose, drying it a little over the fire; for, said he, ‘the Urary is
yet soft, and it will strip off from the arrow as soon as it comes in
contact with the skin; but if it be dried it will not, and will get to
the blood.’ The noble ccck was then shot in the thigh, when it
ran for ten or twelve yards, then walked across the road, of twenty
yards wide, and lay down in the grass, when its head fell as though
its neck had been broken, and he soon after died.
“J wished to have tried the effects of the Urary on a deer, or
some other wild animal, but have not yet had an opportunity ; how-
ever I doubt not, from what I have seen, of its being sufficiently
strong to destroy any animal with which we are acquainted in a
short time. Having heard in time past that snake-teeth were a ne-
cessary ingredient of the Urary, I asked Mulatto whether they were
not (happening to have a few by me that had been taken from the
head of a large rattle-snake that had been taken a few days before,
which were at his service), but he said they were not at all necessary,
that he never used them, nor would they assist much in making the
Urary strong, since the Urary poison did not depend either upon
them or the stinging-ant, and that for himself he used neither.
Mulatto did not fail to act according to their superstitions, in abs-
taining from meats ; also in requesting me not to eat or drink sugar
when I came to see him*, and that no person or woman especially
might come near the Urary-house; and even on the Lord’s day
would he not altogether cease to boil the Urary, but kept a few
sparks alive under the pot, notwithstanding my request that he should
do nothing during the sabbath. He would not as usual come into
* This superstition no doubt arises from their believing sugar to be an
antidote to the Urari poison.—S.
o
5
2
420 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison,
the chapel, but sat without, considering, as I suppose, that he would
become defiled by congregating with the people, and thereby destroy
the power of the Urary.
“‘T must now conclude, and beg your acceptance of the above
observations, as coming from one who wishes you every success in
your arduous undertaking, as also your welfare in general, both of
soul and body.
‘“« Remaining ever yours,
ST OY OND
Bancroft, in his ‘ Natural History of Guiana,’ gives us a
description of the manner in which the Acawais prepare the
“ Woorara,” as he calls it, which, in its general mode, agrees
with Mr. Yond’s and my own observations. He distinctly
says, “the ingredients are all ‘ nibbees*’ of different kinds.”
There is no doubt that different nations prepare their Urari
in different modes, but the active principle subsists in one or
the other species of Strychnos.
I have already alluded to Humboldt’s account of the mode
of preparation at Esmeralda, at the time of his journey the
place most famed at the Upper Orinoco for making the arrow-
poison. Von Humboldt’s narrative is too generally known
to demand a recital of his graphic account. However, Esme-
ralda is no longer what it was forty years ago; and when I
visited it in 1839 I found it merely inhabited by an Indian
patriarch and his family, who, on my inquiries, informed me
that he bought his poison from the Indian tribes who inhabit
the banks of the rivers Paramu and Ventuari, namely, the
Guinaus and the Maiongkongs. These tribes, who were
known to the Spaniards under the name of Maquiritares, call
their poison Cumarawa and Markuri, and distinctly make a
difference between it and the Urari, which they gladly prefer
in consequence of its superior quality, and which they barter
from the Macusis and Arecunas, giving in return the Curata,
that admirable reed, sometimes sixteen feet long without an
internode, and of which the celebrated blow-pipes or Sarba-
cans are made}. From what I learned when amongst these
* Lianas, or ligneous twiners, are called nibbees or bushropes by the
colonists.—S.
t+ Vide Annals of Natural History, vol. v. p. 44, and Linnean Transac-
tions, vol. xviii. p. 557.—It is very remarkable that the plant of which the poi-
son is made, and the reed which forms such an important part in the con-
struction of the blow-pipe, with which the poisoned arrows are propelled,
are plants not equally dispersed over these regions, but grow merely on
isolated spots. The dArundinaria (drundinaria Schomburgkii, Bennett),
which furnishes that remarkable reed, appears to be limited to the chain of
sandstone mountains which extends between the second and fourth parallel
of north latitude. The only localities which I ascertained were Mounts
and the Plant from which it is extracted. 421
tribes, the chief ingredients for the preparation of their poison
is either Strychnos Ronhamon or Strychnos cogens (B.), and
although it resemble the Urari in appearance, we soon found
that it was of inferior strength. The Curare of Esmeralda
was prepared by Indians either related to or of the same tribe
as the Guinaus and Maiongkongs; and when I showed them
a specimen of the Strychnos toxvifera from my herbarium
they appeared to be entirely unacquainted with it, while they
recognized the specimen of S. cogens as that plant of which
they made the Cumarawa. I have already alluded to the
similarity in general appearance between Strychnos cogens
and Strychnos Ronhamon. It is therefore more than proba-
ble that the Curare and Cumarawa are prepared in a similar
manner.
Von Martius relates the mode of preparation of the Urari
as practised by the Juris, Passes, Miranhas and Ticunas, In-
dian tribes of the Amazons and Yupura (vide ‘ Reise in Bra-
silien, ii. pp. 1155 and 1235) ; and as he had opportunity to
be present at the preparation while among the Juri Indians
of the river Yupura, I insert here his remarks. “The chief
ingredient of the arrow-poison of the Indians of the Yupura
is furnished by aslender tree, the Ronhamon Guianensis, Auble
(a Strychnos, L.), which in the Tupi tongue is called Urari-
iwa. The bark, after having been immersed in water, is
pressed out by the Juri-Taboca with his hands, and the yel-
lowish juice is concentrated in a flat plate, over a gentle fire,
and other infusions extracted in a similar manner from the
root of a pepper-shrub (Piper geniculatum) ; from a tree un-
known to me, called Taraira-moira, that is, tree of the fish
Taraira; the bark of a Cocculus plant (Cocculus Juime, M.),
and a twining Ficus, are added in equal quantities. This com-
pound extract, of the consistence of a thick syrup, had acquired
over the fire a dark brown colour, when it was poured into
small vessels, each containing about two ounces, and allowed
to cool in the shade of the cabin. Previously, the Indian
added to every vessel a small fruit of capsicum (Kiynha-avi),
and with this the preparation of the Urari was finished. The
Indians revive its strength when it has become weak, chiefly
by adding the fruit of capsicum and the root of Piper genicu-
latum. There is little doubt that the extract of the four plants
which have been named as additions are of less importance,
and their place might be supplied by others. According to
the information which I received from several Brazilians,
other ingredients are added, namely, the milk of Huphorbia
Mashiatti, Marawacca, and Wanaya, on the rivers Ventuari, Paramu, and
Orinoco,
422 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison,
cotinifolia, Hura crepitans, or the astringent fruits of Guat-
teria veneficiorum, M.; and superstitious Indians add the first
frog which they hear croaking that day, the great black ant,
or teeth of poisonous snakes.” The addition of the teeth of
poisonous snakes and the great black ants, rests here, again,
not upon personal experience, but merely on the information
of Brazilians, no doubt equally inoculated as our colonists
with the wish to see through the mystic veil. Dr. Poppig,
in his ‘ Reise in Chili, Peru, und auf dem Amazonenstrome,’
Leipzig, 1836, vol. ii. p. 456, observes, with respect to the
arrow-poison of Peru, “The supposition occasionally met with
in Peru, that animal poisons were mixed in the composition,
has not met any confirmation.”
M. Orfila, in his work on General Toxicology, M. Emmer
(‘De Effectu Venenorum veget. Americ.’), and others, have
published able treatises on the effect of this poison. The re-
sults are, that when inspissated it may be rendered liquid by
heat, and is soluble in water, in alcohol, in muriatic acid, and
in volatile alkaline spirit. It unites with acids without emo-
tion or change of colour. If it be mixed with alkalis, no
ebullition is observable, but it changes its colour from a dark
brown to a yellowish brown. “A few grains, mixed with as
many ounces of human blood, warm from the veins, entirely
prevents a separation of serum and crassamentum, and the
whole mass continues in a state of fluidity similar to that in
which it is drawn, until, after some days, it putrifies.” (Ban-
croft.) The poison affects chiefly the nervous system. Its
effect of destroying the vital functions is considerably quicker,
as I have found by experiments, if it be brought in contact
with a vein; and I am of opinion that no sure remedy is
known as yet to counteract its effect, if it have entered the
blood in sufficient quantity. I have seen the deer arrested
in his fleet course, wounded by the poisonous arrow; I have
seen the tapir, while swimming across the Rupununi, so
slightly wounded that the spike had just penetrated through
the thick skin; nevertheless it took effect, and the animal ex-
pired. Numerous are the birds of larger and smaller size
which I have seen thus secured.
As much as I had heard of this fatal poison, I nevertheless
cannot abstain from noting the astonishment by which I was
seized when I saw it used for the first time. We travelled
over the savannahs girt by the Pacaraima mountains; a deer
was discovered browsing in the high grass before us. Lieu-
tenant Haining, of the 65th regiment, my faithful travelling
companion, was too far behind with his gun for us to await
his coming up, and one of the Macusi Indians took a poisoned
and the Plant from which it is extracted. 423
spike from his sarima* and fixed it to his arrow. Cautiously
he stole upon the unsuspecting deer, and shot the arrow into
its neck; it made a jump in the air, fled with the speed of the
wind over the savannahs, but it had scarcely run forty yards
when it fell panting to the ground, and expired. Von Hum-
boldt has already related that its effect is more or less sudden
upon different animals. If the poison be good and the arrow
has entered a sufficient depth, it has effect upon the strongest
bull in four to five minutes, while a fowl may resist it double
that time. The Indians say that monkeys and jaguars are
easier killed with it than any other animal.
The poison keeps its efficacy for a length of time. I brought
with me at my return to Europe in 1839 a small calabash of
the Urari, which had been made in May 1839 in my presence.
I made several experiments with it in August 1840, and I
found that it killed a rabbit in four to five minutes. Mr.
Sewell, veterinary surgeon in London, whom we thank for
several experiments to apply the Urari as a remedy in tetanus
of horses, received through me some of the same poison, and
found it effective. While in Potsdam I gave a small quan-
tity to M. Desenis, who wounded several animals with it,
and found that it deprived of life a rabbit in eight minutes, a
cat in four and a half, and a pigeon in six minutest. On
dissecting the animals which had been killed by means of the
Urari, it will be generally found that there are no signs of in-
flammation either in the lungs, stomach, or any other part,
which, with regard to medical jurisprudence, proves this poi-
son to be the more dangerous, as, should it be employed for
sinister purposes by man against his fellow-creature, it would
be difficult to say by a post mortem examination of what the
victim died. In some of the rabbits on which I tried expe-
riments, Dr. Franz found a large quantity of blood in the
brain and the spinal cord.
I have already alluded to Mr. Sewell’s experiments, who,
viewing the lock-jaw in horses as the result of irritation, con-
jectures that “if a horse in tetanus were destroyed by poison,
which acts by suppressing nervous power, and life were then
to be restored by artificial respiration, the nervous system, on
reanimation taking place, might possibly be free of the ori-
ginal morbid irritation.” Reasoning thus, Mr. Sewell tried
the following singular practice: “A horse suffering from a
* Sarima, a small case made of bamboo, and covered with tapir- or deer-
skin, and in which the Indian keeps the poisoned arrows until he stands in
need of them. It is generaily worn round the neck. s
¢ I presented the small calabash with the remaining poison to the Berlin
Museum.
424 Mr.Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison,
severe attack of the tetanus and lock-jaw, the mouth being
too firmly closed to admit the introduction of either food or
medicine, was inoculated on the fleshy part of the shoulder
with an arrow-point coated with the Wourali poison; in ten
minutes apparent death was produced. Artificial respiration
was immediately commenced, and kept up about four hours,
when re-animation took place ; the animal rose up, apparently
perfectly recovered, and eagerly partook of hay and corn.
He unluckily was too abundantly supplied with food during
the night. The consequence was over-distention of the sto-
mach, of which the animal died the following day, without
however having the slightest recurrence of tetanic symptoms.”
(‘Outlines of Human Pathology.’) From this experiment,
which has been repeated, it was considered that it might be
successfully applied in hydrophobia ; and in a distressing case,
where Inspector Phelps, of Nottingham, was suffermg under
this dreadful disease, Mr. Waterton, of Walton Hall, was re-
quested to attend for the purpose of directing the operation.
He came too late, as Mr. Phelps had expired before his arrival:
but, for the advancement of general information, he, with his
usual kind feelings, agreed to exhibit the experiment upon
animals. The proceedings which were carried on before the
surgical and medical profession at Nottingham have been
deta‘ied in the Nottingham Journal of 12th April, 1839, and
have been since likewise printed in several periodical journals,
where they may be referred to by those who feel interested in
it. It was attempted during these experiments to restore by
artificial respiration two asses, after they had been wounded
with the Urari poison. The one first operated upon, although
apparently recovered from the effects, died four days after-
wards of debility: with the fate of the second I am not ac-
quainted. However this may be, it becomes evident, that the
Urari, in the present state of our knowledge of its effects,
could only be resorted to in the greatest extremity as a remedy
against hydrophobia, and where there is no hope of recovery.
_ The poison has been hitherto only to be procured with diffi-
culty, as the Indians who manufacture it are not easily induced
to part with it; but as I have fully ascertained that the effect-
ive principle is the bark of the Strychnos toxifera, and that
the additional herbs are of less importance, and no doubt
serve merely to mystify its preparation, it will become easy to
any one to prepare the Urari, provided the bark be in his
reach. It will likewise assist to draw the attention of the fa-
culty to the chemical properties of the genus Strychnos.
According to M. Chevreul, the Strychnos nux vomica con-
sists of acidulous malate of lime, gum, vegeto-animal matter,
and the Plant from which it is extracted. 425
bitter matter, fixed oil, colouring matter, (which was yellow
and probably starch, and which could not be directly extracted
on account of its desiccation,) earthy and alkaline salts, woody
hairs and wax, which latter appears to preserve the perisperm
from humidity*. MM. Pelletier and Caventou have since
discovered two vegetable alkalies, Strychnine and Brucine,
in it.
It is known that where the Urari has not produced death, it
has been followed bytorpor and paralytic fits; and where it has
taken effect, the victim dies under convulsions. It appears,
when brought in contact with the blood, to have a direct
power over the spinal cord. The same effect is produced by
the nux vomica when taken internally. M. Orfila observes,
** A person swallowed in the morning a scruple of nux vomica
in powder, and drank afterwards a few glasses of cold water
in order to diminish the bitterness occasioned by this sub-
stance. Half an hour after he appeared to be drunk; his
limbs, especially his knees, were stiff and tense: his walk was
staggering, and he was afraid of falling. He took some food
and the symptoms disappeared. The administration of nux
vomica and of the root of gentian to a woman affected with
ague was followed by convulsions, cold and stupor, and almost
every part of the body was torpid.” (Scutter’s Dissert.t)
It is remarkable that the poison proves innocent when
taken internally, and is even recommended as a remedy in
gastric disorders. While, during my late expedition in the
interior of Guiana, I was suffering under all the horrors of a
tertian ague, and our quinine had fallen short, I took fre-
quently the Urari in doses of about as much as I could get
on the point of the knife. After having taken it I felt gene-
rally a slight head-ache, but it did not remove the fever; and
fearing there might be an excoriation of the tongue or throat,
or bleeding of the gums, without being aware of it, my com-
panions induced me to desist from the dangerous experiment.
The Indian when he purchases the poison tastes it, in order
to judge of its genuineness. It is well ascertained, also, that
animals shot with the Urari are more savoury when prepared
for food, and the meat is quite innocent. Generally, the
game which we received from the Indians was killed with the
poisoned arrow, and we never hesitated to eat of it. Dissec-
tion of those who have died of the nux vomica shows no or-
ganic lesions, which is likewise the case where death has been
produced by the Urari coming in contact with the blood. The
first is proved by numerous experiments of M. Orfila; the
* Medical Botany, etc., London, 1831, vol. ii. part lii. t Ib. part lii.
426 Mr. Schomburgk on the Indian Arrow Poison.
latter by those of Mr. Waterton in England, and several phy-
sicians in Demerara. The juice of the Cassada becomes in-
nocent by being boiled, that of the Urari becomes poisonous
after it has been concentrated by the action of fire: should
the poisonous principle of the Jatropha manihot be entirely
volatile? The Cassaripe is the concentrated juice of the Ja-
tropha manihot, and is used as fish-sauce and for many culi-
nary purposes, while in its pure state it proves poisonous to
animal life; what then can cause the difference? I am not
aware whether experiments have been made by inoculating
animals with the juice of the nux vomica in its pure state, and
likewise after having been concentrated.
Sir Walter Raleigh says, in his second Guiana voyage,
“There was nothing whereof I was more curious than to find
out the true remedies of these poisoned arrows..... And it is
more strange to know that in all this time there was never
Spaniard, either by gift or torment, that could attain to a true
knowledge of the cure, although they have martyred and put
to invented torture I know not how many of them.” Raleigh
recommends garlic as an antidote where the wound has been
inflicted with an arrow of the ordinary poison, and advises
them to abstain from drink, “ for if they take any liquor into
their body, as they shall be marvellously provoked thereunto
by drought, I say, if they drink before the wound be dressed,
or soon upon it, there is no way with them but present death.”
Irai, a Carib chieftain of the Rupununi, and the last descend-
ant in direct line of the Cacique Mahanarawa, so far confirms
Raleigh’s account, that the thirst which ensues after a wound
has been inflicted is intolerable. He pretended that the in-
fusion from the root of a species of Wallaba (Dimorpha, W.),
mixed with sugar, or the juice of sugar-cane, was an antidote.
There is not much dependence to be placed on this remedy.
While in Curasawake in 1838, we secured several Kings of
the Vultures (Sarcorhamphus Papa) alive. A female which we
had for several weeks succeeded in escaping out of the place
where she was kept, and flew to a neighbouring tree. 1 was
loath to lose her, and resolved to shoot her with weakened
Urari poison. It took effect, and she fell from the tree. We
immediately applied juice of the sugar-cane, but without
avail ; and after having lingered for half an hour, she died un-
der convulsions. Humboldt observes, that an application of
salt internally and to the wound would be found of importance;
and Mr. Waterton informs us, that an ass which was poisoned
by Wourali recovered by inflating his lungs with a pair of bel-
lows*. In the ‘Annals of Philosophy,’ vol. xv. p. 389, we
* Waterton’s ‘ Wanderings,’ p. 83.
Mr. Brown on the Clacton Fluvio-Marine Deposit. 427
are informed that M. Drapiez has ascertained by numerous
experiments that the fruit of the Feuillea cordifolia is a
powerful antidote against vegetable poison. The genus Feu-
illea is common to South America, and the subject is of such
interest that it deserves a trial.
EXPLANATION OF THE FIGURES.
Pirate XII. Branch of the Urari plant, Strychnos toxifera, Schomb., less
than natural size.
Prate XIII. Fig. 1. Fruit of the Urari plant, natural size.
Fig. 2. Do. cut transversely, natural size.
Fig. 3. Seed of do., natural size.
XLIL—A List of the Fossil Shells found in a Fluvio-Marine
Deposit at Clacton in Essex. By Mr. J. BRown*.
GENTLEMEN,
Tue fossils named in the accompanying list were obtained
by searching the beds which compose the fluvio-marine de-
posit at Clacton, on the eastern coast of Essex, a section of
which is given in the ‘ Mag. Nat. Hist.,’ vol. iv. p. 199, N.S.,
with a description of the geological features of that forma-
tion.
In a note appended to that article, which accompanies the
above-mentioned section, a promise is held out to the readers
of the Magazine, that a list of the fossils, which have excited
a peculiar and lively interest in the Clacton deposit, would at
some future opportunity be furnished.
It is intended by the present communication to supply that
deficiency ; and as the greater number of the fossil shells,
both of marine and freshwater species, collected from those
beds, have been very recently submitted to the notice of Mr.
J. D. C. Sowerby, the list is offered with the greater confi-
dence.
Fossils of the Bed No. 4. in Section fig. 9. Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. iv.
p- 194, N.S.
Marine.
. Balanus ovularis ? Lam.
. Tellina solidula.
tenuis.
Mactra ovalis, Sow. A crag fossil.
. Mytilus edulis. Mostly very young.
. Cardium edule.
Do OD =
* Vide Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. iy. p. 197, N.S.
428 Mr. Brown on the Clacton Fluvio-Marine Deposit.
7. Littorina Ulve.
8. Flustra. Encrusting shells and pebbles.
Freshwater Shells, etc. of No. 4.
9. Pisidium amnicum, Gray.
10. Paludina impura ; Bithinia tentaculata, Gray.
thermalis ?
12. Valvata piscinalis, Gray.
cristata, Gray.
14. Cypris Faba.
15. Chara hispida?
Fossils of No. 6. Section fig. 9. descending series.
Marine and Freshwater, the same as in No. 4.
Freshwater Fossils found in Bed No. 7. Sec. 9.
1. Limneus auricularius, Gray.
2. Paludina impura ; Bithinia tentaculata, Gray.
oe — minuta.
4. Valvata piscinalis, Gray.
De — cristata, Gray.
6. Planorbis imbricatus.
Us levis.
8. helicoides. A new species. Sowerby.
@,; 2. marginatus.
10. ——- contortus.
11. Ancylus fluviatilis.
12. Pisidium amnicum, Gray.
Henslowianum.
— pusillum, Gray.
15. Cypris Faba.
16. Cypris. A larger species.
17. Vertebree of small fish.
Land Fossil Shells, etc. from Bed No. 7. Sec. 9.
18. Helix paludosa ; H. pulchella, Gray.
19. rufescens.
20. radiata ; Zonites rotundatus, Gray.
Dil alliaria.
22 umbilicata ; Zonites umbilicatus, Gray.
23 conoidea. A new species. Pl. Il. f. 4, 5.
24. Pupa edentula.
25. Clausilia.
26. Bulimus lubricus.
27. Carychium minimum.
28. Molar tooth of a Rodent, probably a Water Rat.
29. Seeds of Chara.
30. Triloculina inflata (Deshayes), figured in Lyell’s ‘ Prin. of Geol.’
vol. iii. This minute fossil occurs both at Clacton and Walton :
it is the only marine shell in this bed.
Stanway, April 15th, 1841. JOHN BROWN.
Bibliographical Notices. 429
The following are descriptions of the two new shells found
in this deposit :—
Planorbis helicoides. Lenticular, shining, above slightly convex
and minutely umbilicated ; edge obtuse ; whorls two and a half,
concealed, the outer one large; beneath convex, a little de-
pressed in the centre, where the whorls are visible.
Diameter about one-tenth of an inch. It resembles somewhat
Zonites (Helix) radiatulus, but is flatter, having more the form of
Segmentina (Planorbis) lineata, but wanting the septa.
Helix conoidea. Short, conical, finely striated ; whorls about six,
convex; base largely umbilicated, convex ; aperture oblong-
ovate, its upper half deeply impressed by the preceding whorl ;
its peristome confined to the lower half, prominent and straight.
This differs from H. rufescens in being regularly conical, and
having a more elevated pointed spire. See Plate II. figs. 4, 5, in this
volume.
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTICES.
On the Relation between the Holy Scriptures_and some Parts of Geo-
logical Science. By J. Pye Smith, D.D. 12mo. London, 1840.
2nd ed.
The Certainties of Geology. By W. Sidney Gibson, F.G.S. 8vo.
London, 1840.
No two subjects would appear at first sight to be more discon-
nected than those of Geology and Revealed Religion. The one is
engaged solely in examining the structure of the earth, and in thence
deducing conclusions as to the physical causes which have brought
it into its present condition ; the other treats of the moral history of
man, his relations to his Creator and to his fellow-creatures, and the
whole sphere of his duties and his destinies. So wholly distinct in-
deed are these two studies, that they cannot be said in the slightest
degree to aid each other. A geologist may reason with precisely the
same accuracy on the facts of his own science, even should he un-
fortunately be a disbeliever in Revelation; and it is equally certain
that a knowledge of the discoveries of modern Geology is not (except
as connected with Natural Theology) in the remotest degree condu-
cive to the all-important studies and devotions of the Christian.
There seems, therefore, no reason why the two inquiries should not
be successfully prosecuted without encroaching on each other’s do-
main. The fact however is otherwise: Geology and Revelation have
been very unnecessarily brought into collision by persons who seem
to have but an imperfect notion of the true limits and ends of each.
Volumes have been written accusing geologists as a body with being
inimical to religion, and denouncing the science itself as a delusive
and pernicious study. The geologist is hence compelled in self-de-
fence, however unwilling he may be to desert the legitimate fields
of his inquiries, to arm himself against these well-meaning, though
430 Bibliographical Notices.
too often intolerant opponents, with the weapon of rational and tem-
perate argument.
It is on these grounds that geologists may feel grateful to the au-
thors of the two treatises which are under our notice. We trust they
will have the effect of rescuing geology from the calumnies which
have been cast upon it, and of allaying in the mind of the sincere be-
liever any misgivings on the subject which may have arisen from the
intemperate language used by some of the opponents of the science.
Dr. Pye Smith’s little volume is written in a strain at once pious
and philosophical. He has bestowed much diligence in consulting au-
thorities, and in applying the resources of criticism to the elucidation
of Scripture ; and to these requisites he has superadded an element
which is often wanting in the writings of those who have attempted
this subject,—a complete practical knowledge of the details of geo-
logical science. Devoted to the truths of Revelation no less than to
those of Science, and regarding them both as proceeding from the:
same Divine Source, he will allow of no compromise, distortion, or
subterfuge, with respect to either.
The points at issue in this controversy may be thus stated. After
a most extensive induction of facts collected in all parts of the globe
by a numerous body of laborious and diligent observers, the more
philosophical geologists have deduced from them a mass of new and
most extraordinary results, all tending to prove the power and pro-
vidential care of the Deity from the Creation to the present day, and
thus widely extending the field of Natural Theology. Among the
generalizations thus arrived at, there are two or three points on
which nearly all geologists are agreed, but which are inconsistent
with the generally received interpretation of certain passages in the
book of Genesis. Now it is important to observe two things: first,
that these apparent discrepancies relate to points wholly unconnected
with the essential objects of Scripture, namely, the moral history
and duties of Man ; and secondly, that they refer to events long an-
terior to the commencement of written history. Subsequent to that
period there is not one single circumstance recorded in Holy Writ which
can in any way be brought into connexion either favourably or other-
wise with the discoveries of modern geology. If then the passages
in question relate to points foreign to the objects of the author of
Genesis, and were compiled from local traditions or very ancient
writings, even though secured by direct inspiration from the possi-
bility of actual error, yet it is plain that there is a greater liability
to obscurity of language and consequent erroneous interpretation in
this portion of Scripture than in those later narrations which were
recorded by eye-witnesses and contemporaries. And it is further evi-
dent that a very large allowance must be made for the necessity of
adapting the language of Genesis to the people to whom it was ad-
dressed. Moses wrote indeed prospectively for all mankind, but im-
mediately for the Jews, a nation just released from slavery, and in a
state of mental advancement little superior to that of children. The
utmost condescension of language was therefore necessary before the
sublime truths of religion could be brought home to the comprehen-
Bibliographical Notices. 4351
sions of such a people—a point which is admirably elucidated by
Dr. Pye Smith in his seventh Lecture.
The only points in which the discoveries of modern geology are
at variance, not with the truths of Revelation, for that they never
can be, but with the prevailing interpretations of the Pentateuch,
are the three following: viz. the antiquity of the world; the exist-
ence of death before the fall of Adam; and the partial extent of the
deluge. The facts unfolded by modern science unquestionably de-
monstrate that the earth is of far greater antiquity than the 6000
years usually assigned to it, and they prove with equal certainty
that animal life was subject to death during periods long prior to
the creation of Man; there are reasons also, though not of the
same demonstrative nature as those above mentioned, yet hardly
less convincing to a geologist, for supposing that the Noachic de-
luge, instead of covering the whole globe as is commonly believed,
was confined to that portion of it which was then inhabited by man.
Those friends to Revelation, therefore, who are not content to rest
satisfied in the opinion of Dr. Paley, that Christianity ought not to
be made answerable for the statements and opinions of every writer
in the Old Testament*, will be anxious to seek for such an interpre-
tation of the sacred text as will accord with the facts on which these
conclusions of science are built.
Dr. Pye Smith, after reciting at considerable length and in a most
candid spirit the various speculations of other authors on this sub-
ject, concludes with explaining his own views of the question.
* “ To make Christianity answerable for the circumstantial truth of each
separate passage of the Old Testament, the genuineness of every book, the
information, fidelity, and judgment of every writer in it, is to bring, I will
not say great, but unnecessary difficulties, into the whole system.”—Paley’s
Evidences of Christianity, part ili. ch. 3.
“‘ Our Scriptures afford a valuable testimony to those of the Jews. But
the nature of this testimony ought to be understood. It is surely very dif-
ferent from, what it is sometimes represented to be, a specific ratification of
each particular fact and opinion.” —Jd.
Dr. Paley’s view is in accordance with that of other distinguished theo-
logians, as will appear from the following extracts :—
“ To rectify men’s sentiments in natural, historical, or chronological mat-
ters; to mend their logick or rhetorick where it was defective, but had no
ill influence on piety, was not at all the business of Revelation.” — Bishop
Chandler’s Defence of Christianity, p. 272.
“The Natural Philosophy of the Pentateuch ought not to induce us to
reject it. It is not at all likely that God, in order to enable a man to be a
lawgiver of the Jews, should reveal to him all the causes of the phenomena
of nature.” —Lectures in Divinity, by Dr. Hey, Norrisian Professor, Cam-
bridge, vol. i. p. 196.
“« Many serious and thinking Christians have judged that the first part of
Genesis is not a literal description of fact, but allegorical.” —J., vol. iii. p.
152.
“« Whether the beginning of Genesis is to be understood in a literal or an
allegorical sense? Whether the book of Job be a history, or a parable?
being points disputed between Christians, an infidel can have no right to
argue from one side of the question in those and the like cases.” —Bishop
Berkeley's Minute Philosopher, Dialogue vi. § 29.
432 Bibliographical Notices.
He meets the difficulty respecting the antiquity of the earth by
supposing that all the geological formations discovered by modern
science were deposited after the original creation of matter asserted
in the first verse of Genesis, but before the particular series of events
narrated in the rest of the chapter. These vast geological periods,
being unconnected with human history, are wholly omitted by Moses.
The narrative which follows he supposes to refer, not to the whole
earth, but to a particular region, probably in Central Asia, which he
considers to have been reduced by volcanic or other agencies to the
state of darkness and desolation described in the second verse. ‘The
rest of the chapter relates, in the most simple and condescending
language, the gradual restoration of this region to a state of fertility,
and the consummation of the six days’ work by the creation of Man.
This hypothesis is perfectly consistent with geological facts, and may
surely be considered as being calculated to give satisfaction to the
mind of the Christian philosopher.
The question as to the existence of death before the fall of Adam
is easily disposed of. When we are told that “‘ by man sin entered into
the world, and death by sin,” it is evident from the whole context
that it is only the death of man, not that of the inferior animals,
which is spoken of. The testimony of geology as to the existence
of animal death from the earliest times is corroborated by the voice
of comparative anatomy no less than of common sense.
Dr. Pye Smith proceeds to show, that the objections which have
been raised on geological grounds to the supposed universality of
the deluge may be set at rest by assuming the Noachic flood, like the
Adamic creation, to have been confined to a limited district. He
quotes many texts in which the phrase ‘all the earth”’ is used figu-
ratively for a particular region, and hence it is easy to suppose, that
in the case of the deluge the same expression may have a similarly re-
stricted meaning. And it is aremarkable fact that there is a vast re-
gion on the shores of the Caspian which is at least 100 feet below
the level of the sea, an irruption of which would at this day inun-
date many thousand square miles and destroy millions of lives.
Dr. Pye Smith conjectures, that by volcanic disturbances the Indian
Ocean gained access to this depressed region, where, aided by vast
torrents of rain, a deluge was produced sufficient to destroy the
human race of that period. The ark, containing a few favoured sur-
vivors, might thus easily be drifted, not indeed to the frozen sum-
mit * of the Armenian Ararat according to the common tradition, but
to some of the lower ranges of hills connected with that mountain.
This hypothesis of our author has certainly great plausibility, and
we will only suggest as an amendment, that the tract in question was
more likely to have been inundated from the Euxine than from the
Indian Ocean. The Euxine and Caspian Seas are separated by a
very low tract of land in South Russia, and if the Bosphorus were
now to be blocked up by a volcanic eruption, the waters of the
Euxine would rise to the height of 576 feet, and those of the Cas-
* Mr. Beke, however, contends that it must have been upon the highest
point: see his ‘ Origines Biblice,’ 1834,
Bibliographical Notices. 433
pian to 677 feet above their present level, before they would find a
vent over the lowest point of the Balcan range. An elevation of
water to this extent would inundate the whole lower basin of the
Danube, the South of Russia, Georgia, Bokhara, and a vast extent
of Tartary, and a removal of the barrier would cause the waters
speedily to subside. ‘That such an event ever actually occurred it
would be rash to assert; but it is certainly a remarkable fact, that
both shores of the Bosphorus, where it joins the Euxine, are occu-
pied by masses of volcanic rocks, and traditions of the damming-up
of the Black Sea and the bursting of the barrier were current among
the ancients, and are recorded by Diodorus Siculus and Strabo*.
We are conscious that justice is not done to Dr. Pye Smith’s ar-
guments by this brief abstract of their results, and we therefore the
more strongly recommend his work to the profound attention of the
philosophic theologian no less than of the Christian geologist. It is
a work calculated to be eminently conducive to the best interests
both of religion and of science at the present moment.
Mr. Sidney Gibson’s work goes over the same ground as that of
Dr. Smith, and arrives at nearly the same conclusions. Although not
illustrated to the same extent with the treasures of learning, it is
marked throughout by candour and sincerity no less than by sound-
ness of reasoning. Like Dr. Pye Smith, he explains the antiquity of
the earth by supposing a vast lapse of time between the universal and
the Adamic creation, but to this assumption he superadds that of the
six ‘‘ days of creation” having been six indefinite periods. Many
writers have had recourse to the same hypothesis; but if it should be
thought right not to depart further from the strict letter of Scripture
than the facts of the case require, it may be observed that these are
already satisfied by the explanation given by Dr. Smith, as above
announced.
Our space prevents us from noticing Mr. Gibson’s work in greater
detail, but we cordially recommend it as an excellent coadjutor to
that of Dr. Smith in the laudable office of rendering science and reli-
gion mutually confirmatory of each other. And should there be any
who may still entertain doubts with regard to the hypotheses pro-
posed in them, we would again direct their attention to the opinion of
so able a reasoner and so eminent an expositor of the evidences of
Christianity as Dr. Paley.
Linnea, ein Journal fiir die Botanik, etc. 1840.
{Continued from vol. vi. p. 148.]
Parr I.
Scholium to Hampe’s Prod. Flore Hercyn.—Schlechtendal on
Schiede’s and Ehrenberg’s Mexican plants.
Part II.
On Tetradiclis, Stev.; by Dr. A. Bunge.—On Conferva Lehman-
niana; by Dr. Lindenberg.—On the structure of the stem of [soetes
* Respecting the Greek traditions of the Deluge, see Mr. Kenrick’s dis-
sertations in the ‘ Philological Museum,’ vol. ii., and in the ‘ Philosophical
Magazine,’ N.S. vol. v.
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2¥
434 Entomological Society.
lacustris ; by Prof. Mohl.—On the Dry Rot; by Schwabe.—Synop-
sis of Desmidia; by J. Meneghini.
Part III.
On the proper systematic place of certain families of Plants.—On
some Diatomacee ; by Lobarzewski.—On a true circulation in Closte-
rium Lunula; by Lobarzewski.—Plants on sale from Bahia; by
Luschnath.—Botanical Observations ; by Schlechtendal.
Part IV.
Decades of new Composite ; by Walpers.—Supplement to Prod.
Fl. Herc. ; by Hampe.—On the Carices of Thunberg’s Flora Capensis ;
by Schlechtendal—On a monstrosity in the leaves of Trifolium re-
pens; by Walpers.—Four new Mammillarie; by Ehrenberg.— Mexican
Plants of Schiede and others; by Schlechtendal.
Part V.
Synopsis Thymelearum, Polygonearum, et Begoniarum Africz
australis; by Meisner.—Decade of new Composite ; by Walpers.—
Mexican Plants of Schiede and others ; by Schlechtendal.—Obser-
vations on passages in Endlicher and Martius’s Fl. Braziliensis ;_ by
Schweegrichen.
Part VI.
Scholium to Hampe’s Prod. Fl. Hercyn.
Icones Fungorum hucusque cognitorum. 'Tomus 4. A.C. I. Corda.
Pragze, 1840.
Our object in noticing the present number, which in point of exe-
cution exceeds even the two preceding, is to call attention to the ad-
mirable figure of Puccinia graminis, or mildew. It is far more com-
plete than that so often referred to of Bauer. Among the points
elucidated in the present number, is the very interesting one that
Asterophora is a mere parasite of the second order, its matrix having
perfect sporidia. The author does not seem to have access to many
well-known journals, or he would not have published as Sporocybe
Desmazierii a plant altogether unlike that figured under that name
in the ‘ Annales des Sciences Naturelles ;’ neither would Spheria
Robertsti, Hook., of which an admirable analysis is given, appear as
an undescribed species, Sp. Hiigelii.
PROCEEDINGS OF LEARNED SOCIETIES.
ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY.
January 4th, 1841.—The Rev. F. W. Hope, F.R.S., President,
in the Chair.
The President stated, in reference to Mr. Schomburgk’s memoir,
read at a previous meeting, that migrations of butterflies to a very
great extent had been repeatedly observed in South America, in-
stances of which had been recorded in Helme’s account of Buenos
Ayres.
Mr. Westwood corrected an error which had occurred in the
printing of a memoir relative to the Pediculus Melitte of Kirby, or
Entomological Society. 435
the larva of Meloe, in the Transactions of the Society, in which it
had been stated that the specimens which he had found at large and
dissected were identical with some reared by the Rev. L. Jenyns
from the darve of the Meloe, whereas the latter had been reared from
the eggs of that insect. This correction was especially required,
because in the volume upon insects in the Cabinet Cyclopedia it had
been suggested by Mr. Shuckard that the two insects were not iden-
tical.
A memoir was read by Mr. Westwood on the nomenclature of the
genus Chlorion of Latreille (Ampulex, Jurine). From a review of
Latreille’s various works it appears, that although at the first he gave
the Sphex lobata, Fabr. as the type of the genus, yet its characters
were not derived from that insect, but agree with the Spher com-
pressa, Fabr. Fabricius, however, adopted and characterized the
genus Chlorion from the former of these two species, but included in
it also Sphex compressa. Jurine, however, finding the latter species
not to agree generically with the former, proposed the name of dm-
pulex for the Spher compressa, and figured an European species as an
example, which however does not precisely agree with S. compressa.
Under these circumstances the author considers that the name of
Chlorion ought to be applied to the genus typified by Spher com-
pressa, that the Chlorion of Fabricius requires another name, and
that the name Ampulexr is strictly synonymous with Chlorion, the
same species being the true type of both generic names. In allusion
to the employment of synonymical names of genera, Mr. Yarrell
stated that a calculation had been made by Messrs. Agassiz and De-
Candolle, by which it appeared that no less than 300 generic names
of plants and 800 names of zoological genera required changing,
having been previously used in other branches, and it was insisted
upon by several members that the inconvenience which would neces-
sarily result from the change in such a number of names would far
overbalance the occasional slight inconveniences at present felt in
cases of such ‘‘ double emploies,” as the French term them. It was
further suggested by Mr. Waterhouse, that as Latreille had erred
in the first instance in giving as the type of Chlorion an insect which
did not accord with the generic characters which he had detailed,
we ought to adopt the nomenclature of Fabricius, who had given the
real characters of the insect which Latreille had mentioned as its
typical species.
Anniversary meeting, January 25th, 1841.—The Rev. F. W. Hope
in the Chair.
At this Meeting the ordinary business of the annual meeting took
place. W. Sells, G. R. Waterhouse, S. Stevens, and W. Bennett,
Esqrs., were elected into the Council in the room of E. Charlesworth,
W. E. Shuckard, J. F. Stephens, and F. Walker, Esqrs., and W.
W. Saunders, Esq., F,E.S., was elected President, W. Yarrell, Esq.,
Treasurer, and J. O. Westwood, Secretary for the ensuing year.
In the address delivered by the Rev. F. W. Hope, after favourably
commenting upon the character of the Society’s Transactions, he
BAN? .
436 Linnean Society.
suggested the propriety of members taking up the old theses of Lin-
neus and bringing down the subjects therein treated upon to the
present state of the science. The injurious effects of insects upon
agricultural and horticultural productions ought also to engage the
attention of the members. He would also recommend the formation
of committees, taking up and annually reporting upon the entomo-
logy of the various geographical districts: and he alluded to the
great loss the Society and science had sustained by the deaths of
Dr. Goodall, Mr. Vigors, and Major Gyllenhal.
It was announced that the caterpillar of one of the Noctuide which
devours the roots of turnips should be again proposed as the subject
of the essay for the prize of ten guineas, offered by the Society in
conjunction with the Saffron Walden Agricultural Society.
The Rev. F. W. Hope also announced his intention of giving a
prize of £10 for the best essay on the insects which attack apple and
pear trees, with the best remedy for their destruction.
LINNZAN SOCIETY.
March 2, 1841.—Mr. Forster, V.P., in the Chair.
Read a ‘‘ Note on the Preservation of Specimens of Natural
History.” By Hyde Clarke, Esq., F.L.S.
Mr. Clarke suggests the application of Payne’s apparatus for the
preservation of animal substances for domestic purposes, to the pre-
servation of objects of Natural History. The apparatus consists of
an iron cylinder, in which the subject for preparation is placed, and
the air-tight cover screwed down. ‘The air is then exhausted by
means of an air-pump, and when a sufficient exhaustion has been
effected, a cock is opened communicating with a vessel containing
the antiseptic fluid, which, on being admitted, thoroughly pene-
trates the object to be preserved, impregnating even the marrow of
the bones. He adds, that the process is useful not only for the
prevention of putrefaction, but also in arresting its progress, the
gases generated during putrefaction being expelled from the re-
ceiver along with the air, and their place supplied by the antiseptic.
March 16.—Mr. Brown, V.P., in the Chair.
Read ‘‘ On an edible Fungus from Tierra del Fuego, and an allied
Chilian species.” By the Rev. M. J. Berkeley, M.A., F.L.S.
Mr. Berkeley describes these two species as constituting a new
genus, which he characterizes as follows :—
CYTTARIA.
Receptacula carnoso-gelatinosa in stroma commune subglobosum, epider-
mide crassiuscula vestitum, aggregata ; basi stipitiformi granulata.
Cupula peripherica, primo clausa, gelatina distenta, demim epidermide
rupta aperta. Hymenium, margine exeepto, separabile. sci ampli,
demum liberi, paraphysibus immixtis. Veluwm persistens, demum
ruptum, margine plis minus reflexo. Sporidia pallida.
Genus Bulgari affine, sed stromate pulvinato ex variis individuis com-
posito Spheriam concentricam quodammodo referens, et hymenio sepa-
rabili valde diversum. Certé ad seriem Pexizarum pertinet, perithecio
spurio non obstante. Confer Spi@riam monocarpam, Schum. ad Pexi-
Linnean Society. 437
zam rhizopodam a clar. Friesio ascriptam. Nomen dedi a xUTT 2005,
ob superficiem fungi alveolatam.
1. C. Darwinii, vitellina globoso-depressa, cupulis parvis ore irregulari de-
mum apertis.
Hab. in Fagum betuloidem in Tierra del Fuego, Dec.-Jun.
2. C. Berteroi, pallidior irregularis, basi subelongata, cupulis majoribus ;
ore pentagono; margine fisso reflexo.
Hab. in Chili in Fagum obliquam, vere et zstate.
The first species is noticed by Mr. Darwin (from whom Mr.
Berkeley obtained his specimens of both) at p. 298 of his ‘ Journal
and Remarks,’ forming the third vol. of the ‘ Narrative ef the
Voyages of the Adventure and Beagle’ ; and Mr. Berkeley gives from
Mr. Darwin’s MS. notes a more detailed account of his observations
made upon the spot. The second species is referred to in a post-
humous list of the plants collected by Bertero (originally published
in the ‘Mercurio Chileno,’ and translated in Silliman’s ‘ North
American Journal,’ vol. xxiii. p. 78), as forming, perhaps, ‘‘ a new
genus approximating to the Spherie.”’ A further account of this
species also is extracted from Mr. Darwin’s notes: it seems to be
less eatable, and less frequently eaten than the first, which Mr.
Darwin describes as forming a very essential article of food for the
Fuegian.
Read also a “ Letter from Joseph Woods, Esq., F.L.S., to Mr.
Kippist, on Crepis biennis and Barkhausia taraxacifolia.”
Mr. Woods is of opinion that the plant described by Sir James
Smith in the ‘ English Flora’ and ‘ English Botany,’ by Sir W. J.
Hooker in the ‘ British Flora,’ by Mr. Babington in the Society’s
« Transactions,’ vol. xvii. p. 456, and by Mr. Mackay in his ‘ Irish
Flora,’ as Crepis biennis, is in reality Barkhausia taraxacifolia, di-
stinguished especially by the long beak of its achenia, while those of
Crepis biennis are, in the words of Gaudin, “‘ neutiquam attenuata.”
The stem of Crepis biennis is also less branched and more leafy than
that of Barkhausia tarazacifolia, the latter rarely producing a leaf
except where there is a branch. Mr. Woods adds, that it is almost
certain that we have the two species in England, though the dif-
ference has not been noticed. Crepis biennis grows in Kent and
Surrey.
In a “Note” appended to Mr. Woods’s letter, Mr. Kippist
states that the authentic Linnean specimens of Crepis biennis from
Scania, although too young to have ripe seeds, appear to confirm
Mr. Woods’s idea, the pappus being quite sessile even in those
most advanced, and the stem moderately branched in the upper
part, and very leafy below. The two specimens in the Smithian
Herbarium, one from Mr. Crowe’s garden and the other from Mr.
Rose’s Herbarium, have the stem much branched, and the pappus
apparently sessile, but the achenia are immature.
The only developed specimen in Mr. Winch’s herbarium is from
Dartford in Kent, and has the pappus very decidedly stalked, the
stem much branched is the upper part, and only a few scattered
leaves in the lower, a branch being produced from the axilla of each
cauline leaf with the exception of one or two of the lowermost.
438 Linnean Society.
Other specimens, gathered near Cobham and Ramsgate, in the same
county, and near Moulsey in Surrey, agree with Mr. Winch’s plant
in their stalked pappus and branched stem, and probably therefore
belong to Barkhausia taraxacifolia. The only British specimens in
the Society’s possession that Mr. Kippist believes to be referrible
with certainty to Crepis biennis are two in the Hortus Siccus of
Mr. Woodward, with ripe achenia and perfectly sessile pappus ; the
habitats of the plants are not given, but in all probability they were
gathered either in Suffolk or Norfolk.
Read also an ‘“‘ Extract from a Letter to John Miers, Esq., F.L.S.,
from George Gardner, Esq.,” dated Rio de Janeiro, Dec. 16, 1840,
in which Mr. Gardner gives some account of his journeys in the in-
terior of Brazil, and of the collections made by him subsequent to
May last.
April 6.—Mr. Forster, V.P., in the Chair.
Read, an Extract of a Letter from J. Burnham, Esq., to Hyde
Clarke, Esq., F.L.S., on a supposed new British Juncus.
Read also the commencement of ‘‘ An Appendix or Supplement
to a Treatise on the @stri and Cuterebre of various Animals.” By
Bracy Clark, Esq., F.L.S., Corresp. Memb. of the French Institute.
April 20.—Mr. Brown, V.P., in the Chair.
His Grace the Duke of Northumberland, F.L.S., sent for exhibi-
tion a specimen of the fruit of Chrysophyllum monopyrenum, Sw.,
from his living collection at Syon House.
W. Felkin, Esq., F.L.S., sent for exhibition specimens of Sea-
Island Cotton grown in a cotton-mill situate in the centre of Man-
chester, accompanied by a Notice of the circumstances under which
the experiment was made. The details have been given in the
Transactions of the British Association.
Read the conclusion of Mr. Bracy Clark’s “Appendix or Supple-
ment to a Treatise on the @stri and Cuterebre of various Animals.”
The first memoir to which this paper is intended as an Appendix
appeared in the third volume of the Linnean Transactions, published
in 1796. This memoir was republished by the author with consi-
derable additions in 1815, and a Supplement was added in the fol-
lowing year. Since that period much has been published on the sub-
ject, and Mr. Clark is desirous in consequence of making some ad-
ditions and corrections to his former publications.
After adding to and modifying some of the passages contained in
them, he examines the validity of several species of the genus Uistrus
proposed by writers. He suspects G2. Trompe of Modeer and Gi.
ericetorum of Leach to be severally the males of Gi. Tarandi and C4.
Bovis. He believes G?. Pecorum of Fabricius to be only a dark-
coloured variety of Gi. nasalis, L. (G2. veterinus, B. Cl.) ; and is sa-
tisfied by an examination of the original specimen, that Dr. Leach’s
G Clarkii is nothing more than a very light-coloured variety of the
same species. He also regards @. lineatus of Villars as synonymous
with G2. Bovis.
Referring to Latreille’s account of the genus in Cuvier’s ‘ Régne
Linnean Society. 439
Animal,’ he points out some omissions with regard to the habits and
ceconomy of G2. Equi and @. hemorrhoidalis, and objects to the
statement that the eggs of the latter are deposited on the verge of
the anus of the animal attacked. He strongly deprecates the opi-
nion of Pallas and Latreille, that there exists a proper human Gstrus,
which he regards as altogether founded in error; and believes the
larva figured in illustration of a supposed case of the kind published
by Mr. Howship, to be that of G?. Bovis.
Lastly, he describes three species, added to the genus @strus since
the publication of his Treatise, viz. Gi. pictus of Megerle, Gi. Liby-
cus of Riippel, and G2. Clarkii of Shuckard. ‘The following are the
characters of the latter species, figures of which, and of Gt. Libycus,
accompany the paper :—
(. Clarkii, czerulescenti-fuscus, alis obscuris anticé sinuatis basin versus
atro-bipunctatis.
Hab. ad Caput Bonz Spei.
He adds also a description of a new species of his genus Cuterebra,
with the following characters :-—
C. fontanella, thorace atro lateribus albis, abdomine violacco: segmentis
ultimis albis nigro-punctatis.
Hab, in Illinois Americz Borealis, cuniculis przcipué infesta.
May 4.—Mr. Brown, V.P., in the Chair.
Read the commencement of ‘‘ Remarks on some new or rare Spe-
cies of Brazilian Plants.” By Charles James Fox Bunbury, Esq.,
F.L.S.
May 24.—The Bishop of Norwich, President, in the Chair.
This day, the Anniversary of the birth-day of Linnzus, and that
appointed by the Charter for the Election of Council and Officers, the
President opened the business of the Meeting, and stated the num-
ber of Members whom the Society had lost during the past year.
The following is a list of the Members who have died within that
period, acccompanied with notices of some among them.
Francis Bauer, Esq., F.R.S., &c., was born at Feldsberg, in
Austria, on the 4th of October, 1758. His father, who held an ap-
pointment as painter to Prince Lichtenstein, died while he was yet
a boy, and the care of his education devolved upon his mother. So
early was his talent for botanical drawing manifested, that the first
published production of his pencil, a figure of Anemone pratensis, L.,
is appended to a dissertation by Stérck ‘de Usu Pulsatille nigri-
cantis,’ which bears date in 1771.
In 1788 he came to England in company with the younger Jac-
quin, and after visiting his brother Ferdinand, who was then engaged
in completing the beautiful series of drawings since published in the
‘ Flora Greca,’ was about to proceed to Paris. But the liberal pro-
posals made to him by Sir Joseph Banks on the eve of his intended
departure, diverted him from this resolution, and induced him to
remain in England and to take up his residence in the neighbourhood
of the Royal Garden at Kew, in which village he continued to dwell
until the termination of his life. It was the opinion of Sir Joseph
Banks, that a botanic garden was incomplete without a draughtsman
440 Linnean Sociely.
permanently attached to it, and he accordingly, with the sanction ot
His Majesty, fixed Mr. Bauer in that capacity at Kew, himself de-
fraying the salary during his own life, and providing by his will for
its continuance to the termination of that of Mr. Bauer. In fulfil-
ment of this engagement with Sir Joseph, Mr. Bauer made numerous
drawings and sketches of the plants of the garden, which are now
preserved in the British Museum. A selection from his drawings
was published in 1796 under the title of ‘ Delineations of Exotick
Plants cultivated in the Royal Garden at Kew,’ and this was in-
tended to be continued annually ; but no more than three parts, con-
sisting wholly of Heaths, and containing thirty plates, were published.
In the early part of 1801, Mr. Bauer made for Mr. Brown, who
had then been for some years engaged in a particular study of the
Ferns, drawings of many genera of that family which Mr. Brown
regarded as new. His drawings of Woodsia, made some years after-
wards, were published in the 11th volume of our ‘Transactions, in
illustration of Mr. Brown’s paper on that genus. At a later period
he again directed his attention to that tribe of plants, his labours in
which have within these few years been given to the world in Sir
William Jackson Hooker’s ‘ Genera of Ferns.’ The 13th volume of
our ‘I’ransactions is enriched with his elaborate drawings accom-
panying Mr. Brown’s memoir on Rafflesia; and the part published
last year contains a paper by Mr. Bauer ‘ On the Ergot of Rye,’ from
materials collected between the years 1805 and 1809.
The plate which accompanies the last-mentioned paper is derived
from drawings which form part of an extensive series in the British
Museum, illustrative of the structure of the grain, the germination,
growth and development of wheat, and the diseases of that and other
Cerealia. ‘his admirable series of drawings constitutes perhaps the
most splendid and important monument of Mr. Bauer’s extraordinary
talents as an artist and skill in microscopic investigation. ‘The sub-
ject was suggested to him by Sir Joseph Banks, who was engaged
in an inquiry into the disease of Corn known under the name of
“Blight,” and the part of Mr. Bauer’s drawings which relates to
that disease was published in illustration of Sir Joseph’s memoir on
the subject, and has been several times reprinted with it. Mr. Bauer
has himself given, in the volume of the ‘ Philosophical Transactions’
for 1823, an account of his observations on the Vibrio Tritici of
Gleichen, with the figures relating to them ; and another small por-
tion of his illustrations of the Diseases of Corn has since been pub-
lished by him in the ‘ Penny Magazine’ for 1833. His figures of a
somewhat analogous subject, the Apple-blight and the Insect produ-
cing it, accompany Sir Joseph Banks’s Memoir on the Introduction
of that Disease into England, in the 2nd volume of the ‘ Transactions
of the Horticultural Society.’
Before the close of the last century Mr. Bauer commenced a series
of drawings of Orchidee, and of the details of their remarkable struc-
ture, to which he continued to add, as opportunities offered, nearly
to the termination of his life. A selection from these, which form
one of the most beautiful and extensive series of his botanical draw-
ings, was lithographed and published by Professor Lindley between
Linnean Society. 441
the years 1830 and 1838, under the title of ‘ Illustrations of Orchi-
daceous Plants.’
His other published botanical works are: 1. The first part, published
in 1818, of ‘ Strelitzia Depicta,’ a work intended to comprise figures
of all the known species of that magnificent genus; 2. ‘ Microsco-
pical Observations on the Red Snow’ brought from the Arctic Re-
gions by Capt. Ross, the globules contained in which, by some re-
garded as an Alga, he described in the 7th volume of the ‘ Quarterly
Journal’ of the Royal Institution as a species of Uredo; 3. ‘Some
Experiments on the Fungi which constitute the colouring matter of
the Red Snow,’ published in the ‘ Philosophical ‘Transactions’ for
1820; and 4. The Plates to the Botanical Appendix to Captain Parry’s
first Voyage of Discovery, published in 1821. One of the last pro-
ductions of his pencil, illustrating the structure of a plant growing
at Kew which produces perfect seeds without any apparent action
of pollen, will appear in the forthcoming part of our Transactions.
In the year 1816 he commenced lending the assistance of his
pencil to the late Sir Everard Home in the various anatomical and
physiological investigations in which that distinguished anatomist
was engaged ; and in the course of ten or twelve years furnished, in
illustration of his numerous papers in the ‘ Philosophical Transac-
tions,’ upwards of 120 plates, which were afterwards reprinted with
Sir Everard’s ‘ Lectures on Comparative Anatomy. ‘These plates,
which form together the most extensive series of his published works,
embraced a great variety of important subjects, chiefly in microscopic
anatomy, and afford abundant evidence of his powers of observation
and skill in depicting the most difficult objects.
It is this rare and previously almost unexampled union of the ob-
server and the artist that has placed Mr. Bauer foremost in the first
rank of scientific draughtsmen. His paintings, as the more finished
of his productions may well be termed, are no less perfect as models
of artistic skill and effect, than as representations of natural objects.
Of all his predecessors, Ehret alone approaches him in these par-
ticulars ; among his contemporaries, none but his brother Ferdinand
can be regarded as his equal.
Mr. Bauer became a Fellow of the Linnean Society in 1804, and
of the Royal Society in 1820. He died at his residence on Kew-
Green on the 11th of December last, in the 83rd year of his age ;
and was buried in the church-yard of that parish on the 16th of the
same month. [See also p. 77 of the present volume. ]
Sir Anthony Carlisle, Knt., F.R.S., &c., a distinguished surgeon
and physiologist, was born at Stillington, in the courty of Durham,
on the 8th of February, 1769, and received his early professional
education partly at York and partly at Durham. He afterwards
came to London, entered himself as a student at the Hunterian
School under Cruickshank and Baillie, and became a resident pupil
to Watson, whom he succeeded as one of the Surgeons of the West-
minster Hospital in 1793. On the retirement of Sheldon, in 1808,
he became Professor of Anatomy to the Royal Academy, and re-
tained that office until 1824. He was also a member of the Council
and of the Court of Examiners of the Royal College of Surgeons, of
442 Linnean Society.
which College he was twice President. At the accession of George
the Fourth he was knighted as a mark of acknowledgment to his
professional skill. He died at his house, in Langham Place, on the
2nd of November last. and was buried in the Cemetery at Kensal
Green.
Mr. Carlisle became a Fellow of the Linnean Society in 1792,
and of the Royal Society in 1804; and his most important contri-
butions to Natural Science are contained in the Transactions of
these Societies. His paper on the Structure and (Economy of
Tenia, in the second volume of our Transactions, is probably the
first attempt to illustrate the structure of Hntozoa by artificial injec-
tions, and established, among other points, the non-existence of an
anus in the Tenia. At this early period, Mr. Carlisle anticipated
M. Virey’s idea of the state of the nervous system in the lowest
animals, on which the chief character of Mr. MacLeay’s Acrita is
founded, ascribing to the Tenie a diffused condition of the nervous
substance, and referring to John Hunter as having, in his lectures,
applied that character to many of the lower tribes of animals.
Of his papers in the ‘ Philosophical Transactions,’ the first in im-
portance and originality is the memoir ‘On the peculiar arrange-
ment of the Arteries in Slow-moving Animals;’ and it is on the
striking discovery detailed in it that his memory as a comparative
anatomist will chiefly rest. His paper on the Physiology of the
Stapes, published in the volume for 1805, affords a good example
of the application of Comparative Anatomy to the elucidation of a
difficult physiological question; almost all the facts contained in it
relating to the form and structure of the stapes in various animals
were new. The Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of the Organ
of Hearing formed the subject of his Lectures at the College of Sur-
geons in 1818.
His Lectures on Extra-vascular Substances, also delivered at the
College of Surgeons, but of which an abstract only of a small por-
tion was published in the ‘ Annals of Philosophy,’ are alluded to in
high terms by Mr. Lawrence. In 1820, and again in 1826, he de-
livered the Hunterian Orations at the College. The latter of these,
containing the Anatomy of the Oyster, has been quoted in reference
to the observations which indicate the sensibility of the Oyster to
light. He also spent much time in experiments on the growth and
reparation of Shell. In the prosecution of his various inquiries he
enriched the Museum of the College with some unique examples of
his peculiar anatomical skill.
Besides these contributions to Comparative Anatomy and Animal
Physiology, Mr. Carlisle communicated to the Horticultural Society
a memoir ‘On the connection between the Leaves and Fruit of
Vegetables, with other Physiological Observations,’ and another
paper published in the 2nd volume of the Transactions of that So-
ciety.
The Bishop of Chichester.
Lord Henry John Spencer Churchill.
Sir John William Lubbock, Bart.
The Rev. Thomas Rackett, M.A., F.R.S., &c., during a long life
Linnean Society. 443
successfully cultivated various branches of Natural Science and the
liberal arts. Associated in his school-days with Hatchett, and after-
wards with Maton, Pulteney and Cavallo, he became attached to
the pursuits by which his friends were distinguished, and assisted
warmly in the promotion of their views. In the years 1794 and
1796, he accompanied the two former in the tours which Dr. Maton
subsequently published under the title of ‘ Observations relative
chiefly to the Natural History, Picturesque Scenery, and Antiquities
of the Western Counties of England,’ and furnished with his pencil
the embellishments of that work, which was inscribed to him ina
friendly and grateful dedication. In conjunction with Dr. Maton,
he published in the 7th volume of our Transactions ‘ An Historical
Account of Testaceological Writers,’ and in the 8th ‘A Descriptive
Catalogue of the British Testacea.’ These works may be justly
characterized as manifesting extensive research, careful comparison,
and accurate observation: the latter long continued to be the text-
book of British Conchologists. Dr. Maton and himself also pub-
lished in our 8th volume ‘An Account of some remarkable Shells
found in cavities of a Calcareous Stone, called by the stone-masons
Plymouth-Rag ; and he subsequently contributed to the 11th volume
‘ Observations on Cancer salinus,’ and to the 12th, ‘ Observations on
a Viper found in Cranborne Chace, Dorsetshire,’ which he presumed
to be Coluber Chersea, L. In addition to his skill in the use of the
pencil, he was an accomplished musician, and devoted much of his
time to antiquarian research, as well as to the prosecution of Natural
and Experimental Philosophy.
Mr. Rackett became a Fellow of the Linnean Society in 1795,
and of the Royal Society in 1803. In the year 1780 he was insti-
tuted to the Rectory of Spettisbury and Charlton, in the county of
Dorset, and died on the 29th of November last, at the advanced age
of 85, after an incumbency of more than sixty years.
The Rev. John Revett Sheppard, M.A.
Lord Viscount Valentia.
Nicholas Aylward Vigors, D.C.L., F.R.S., M.RI.A., &¢., one of
the most eminent ornithologists of the present day, was born in
1787 at Old Leighlin, in the county of Carlow, where his family had
long been settled. He was educated at Trinity College in the Uni-
versity of Oxford, and gave early proof of the diligence and success
with which he pursued his classical and literary studies, by pub-
lishing in 1810 ‘ An Enquiry into the Nature and Extent of Poetick
Licence.’ ‘Towards the close of 1809 he purchased an Ensigncy in
the Grenadier Guards, and was severely wounded in the action at
Barrosa, in the early part of 1811. On his return to England in the
same year he quitted the army, and for the next twenty years
devoted himself to the study of Zoology, and especially of birds
and insects. In both these departments he formed extensive col-
lections, and at a subsequent period liberally presented them to the
Zoological Society, of which he was the first Secretary and one of
the most zealous and active promoters. On the death of his father
he succeeded to the family estate, and in 1832 became the repre-
sentative in Parliament of the borough of Carlow, for which, or for
444 Linnean Society.
the county of the same name, he continued to sit until the termina-
tion of his life on the 26th of last October.
Mr. Vigors became a Fellow of this Society in 1819, and is author
of an important paper in the 14th volume of our Transactions, ‘ On
the Natural Affinities that connect the Orders and Families of Birds.’
In this elaborate memoir he applied to the whole Class of Birds the
principles of the quinary arrangement propounded by Mr. W. 8.
MacLeay in the ‘ Hore Entomologice,’ of which he continued
through life to be one of the most ardent supporters. In the suc-
ceeding volume he published, in conjunction with Dr. Horsfield, the
first part of ‘A Description of the Australian Birds in the collection
of the Linnean Society, with an attempt at arranging them accord-
ing to their Natural Affinities,’ in which the same principles were
further developed and applied to the illustration of the Raptorial and
Insessorial Orders. His only other contribution to our Transac-
tions consists of a ‘ Description of a new Species of Scolopaxr lately
discovered in the British Islands; with Observations on the Anas
glocitans of Pallas, and a description of the Female of that Species,’
contained in the 14th volume.
The first of his papers in the ‘ Zoological Journal’ appeared in
1824; in 1827 he became its principal editor, and so continued until
its termination in 1834. Of his numerous ornithological memoirs
published in that work, perhaps the most important is his ‘ Arrange-
ment of the Genera of Birds ;’ which, although scarcely more than
a bare enumeration of names, contains the most complete outline of
his views on the subject of classification. Some of his notices in
the ‘ Zoological Journal’ are on Entomological subjects ; and several
valuable papers, written in conjunction with Dr. Horsfield, are de-
scriptive of new or rare Mammalia in the collection of the Zoological
Society. For several years before his death the active part which
he took in politics precluded his paying much attention to Zoology,
but he retained to the last a considerable interest in his former pur-
suits, especially in connexion with the Zoological Society. He con-
tributed many valuable notices to the ‘ Proceedings’ of that Society,
Major-General Viney.
Robert Montague Wilmot, M.B.
Rev. William Wood, B.D., and
Francis Boucher Wright, Esq.
Among the Associates
Henry Woods, Esq., a surgeon, formerly resident at Bath, and
subsequently at Camden Town, near London, who was well versed
in the study of the Mammalia, a ‘ Natural History’ of which he was
for many years engaged in preparing for the press. This work,
which was intended to be on a very extensive scale, has never ap-
peared. He was author of ‘ An Introductory Lecture on the Study
of Zoology,’ of a memoir ‘On a new Species of Antelope,’ in the
5th volume of the ‘ Zoological Journal,’ and of one or two notices
in the ‘ Proceedings of the Zoological Society.’ A few years before
his death he quitted the neighbourhood of London and returned to
Bath, where he became Secretary to the Literary Institution, and
died on the 18th of August last, at the age of 46.
Miscellaneous. 445
MISCELLANEOUS.
Third Meeting of the Men of Science of Italy.—The men of science
of Italy have selected Florence as the place of their third meeting,
as well from its being the place which, after having given birth to
the revival of literature and the arts, was the cradle of experimental
philosophy, as from its being the royal seat where was first enter-
tained the thought of this new and great institution, and in which
a high-minded prince has raised to the divine Galileo a temple wherein
his manuscripts and apparatus will be preserved as a large part of
the glorious inheritance of Italy.
It occurred to every one that the friends of science assembled in
Florence, in the midst of such numerous splendid mcenuments of art
and science of past and present times, would feel incited by these
recollections to pursue the course gloriously opened by our fore-
fathers, and by so duing would pay the deserved tribute of their gra-
titude to the prince who encouraged the progress of the sciences,
and promoted the honour of his country.
It is satisfactory to announce, that the Grand Duke, our sovereign,
approving the selection of his capital for the place of the third meet-
ing of the Italian Savans, and having promised to aid its objects in
every manner with his royal bounty and patronage, permits that the
meeting should commence the 15th of September, 1841, to continue
to the end of that month.
The regulations determined on at the first meeting in Pisa have
conferred the right of taking part in the scientific meeting on the
Italians belonging to the principal academies or scientific societies
for the advancement of natural knowledge; the professors of the
physical and mathematical sciences; the directors of the higher
branches of study, or of the scientific establishments of the various
states of Italy; and the chief officers of the corps of engineers and
artillery. Foreigners coming under any of the above descriptions
will be also admitted to the meeting.
We feel sure that our brethren who enjoy the privilege of attend-
ing the meeting will gladly avail themselves of it, and thus contribute
to the great advantages which it confers upon the whole body of
speculative and practical sciences. It is hoped that the invitation to
scientific foreigners will prove not less effectual, as the estimation in
which they hold Italian science is a pledge that they will be anxious
to witness all that Italy has done and is doing, and to afford their
cooperation in the noble undertaking.
A future advertisement will announce the final and special arrange-
ments for the meeting and for the accommodation of those who may
attend it. In the mean time, it is satisfactory to state that there
have been elected to the office of Assessors, Prof. Gaetano Georgini,
Superintendent of the Studies of the Grand Duchy, and Cay. Giu-
seppe Gazzeri, Prof. in the University of Pisa.
Florence, Dec. 28, 1840.
The President General, The Secretary Generel,
Marchese Cosimo Ridolfi. Cay. Ferdinando Tarturi.
446 Miscellaneous.
Dr. Lush on the Madi, or Chili Oil-seed, Madia sativa.—‘‘ We in-
sert a paper by Dr. Lush, of the Medical Establishment of this Pre-
sidency, which brings to notice a new seed, called the ‘ Madi, or
Chili Oil-seed,’ which promises to be a valuable adjunct to the plants
of that class in this country. It appears to flourish in a high and
dry land, and will probably succeed in the Deccan and Southern
Mahratta country. Dr. Lush has presented it to the Agricultural
and Horticultural Society in Bombay, by whom it will be tested and
its uses fully developed.
“The demand which now exists for oil-seeds from British India
has caused much attention to be drawn towards such products as
may be raised in sufficient quantities, and at such a price, as may
ensure them a permanent place among Indian exports to England.
On the western side, or the districts under Bombay, we find, that for
field produce as oil-seeds we must lock out for such articles of cul- -
tivation as will not require irrigation, seeing that the sesamum, the
kerday, the linseed, and the castor-oil are all produced in different
districts of our Presidency as dry crops. Besides those already men-
tioned, we find a quickly-growing plant in the Deccan, sown usually
with the ordinary crops of bajree and pulse, viz. the Verbesina sativa
(since called Guizotia oleifera), or Black Til. This plant is valuable
to the natives from its quick and hardy growth in a dry climate and
scanty monsoon; but from the small quantity of oil in proportion to
the bulk, and the inferior quality of that oil, it is not a plant likely
to attract attention beyond local wants.
“The Madi (Madia sativa) is a plant of the same habit, and allied
in botanical characters to the Verbesina. It has lately been grown
in England by one or two experimentalists, in the hope of obtaining
an indigenous oil of a superior quality. Professor Lindley, who has
grown a portion at the Horticultural Society’s garden at Chiswick,
is of opinion that the climate of England is too damp and cold for
the Madi; and on my requesting to be furnished with seed for trial
in the dry parts of India, he kindly sent me a liberal supply (which I
have brought here overland), and agrees with me in the opinion that
it will stand a good chance in the high and dry lands of the Deccan
and other similar districts of India. A plant requiring no more care
in the cultivation than the black til of the Deccan, and producing an
oil second only to that of the almond and olive, and superior to the
sesamum (the common ‘sweet oil’ of Western India), must prove a
valuable addition to the produce of the country, and as such I com-
mit it to the care of the Agricultural and Horticultural Society of
Bombay without further recommendation, merely subjoining a notice
of what has already been mentioned by authors about this hitherto
neglected plant.
*‘DeCandolle, in his ‘Prodromus,’ gives a full description of the plant,
and notices shortly that the seed is used for making an oil. This
oil, however, does not seem to have attracted the notice of commer-
cial persons, and the only account of it I could procure in London
was kindly pointed out to me by my friend Professor Don, in a work
published in the year 1711 (in the library of the Linnean Society of
Meteorological Observations. 447
London), ‘ Histoire des Plantes Médicinales de Perou et de Chili,’
by Mons. Feuillée. Of this account the following is a translation :
««* An admirable oil is made from the seeds of this plant through-
out all Chili. The natives make use of it not only as a local appli-
cation to assuage pain, anointing with it the parts affected, but also
as a condiment, and besides for burning in lamps. I found it,’ says
M. Feuillée, ‘ sweeter and of a more agreeable taste than the greater
part of our olive oils; its colouristhesame. ‘There are no olives in
Chili, and whatever olive oil is found there is brought from Peru,
where a large quantity is made.’
‘“«T beg to present the Society with an original coloured drawing of
this plant, made for me in August last at Chiswick, by Mr. Hart,
lately draughtsman to the Botanical Register.—Cuar.es Lusu,
M.D.” Bombay Gazette, 26th November, 1840.
Diurnea Novembris, November Dagger.—Several specimens of both
sexes of this insect I have taken in this neighbourhood; the males
fly in quest of the females towards midday. I could only find them
in copulation upon the blades of grass, although at other times they
rest upon the balls of the oaks. The 11th of October was the time
when they first appeared, and continue for three weeks.—Roxzerr
S. Epseron.
11 Derby Street, Cheetham, Manchester.
METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS FOR MAY 1841.
Chiswick.—May 1. Fine: very hot: clear. 2. Very fine: cloudy. 3. Rain.
4. Foggy: cloudy and fine: very heavy fall of rain at night. 5. Rain: cloudy
and fine: lightning at night. 6. Rain: cloudy. 7. Fine: rain. 8. Heavy
showers. 9,10. Very fine. 11. Overcast: slight rain atnight. 12, Cloudy
and fine. 13. Fine. 14—16. Very fine. 17. Cloudy and windy. 18. Fine.
19. Rain with strong wind. 20. Boisterous: showery: cold at night. 21. Dry
haze: rain. 22. Showery and mild. 23, Slight haze: cloudy and fine. 24. Fine.
25. Very fine. 26. Hotanddry. 27. Sultry: much sheet-lightning at night,
with occasionally some of the zigzag and forked kind, together with thunder,
and abrupt showers falling in large drops. 28. Sultry: very fine. 29. Very
fine: lightning at night. 30,31. Overcast and very fine.
Boston.—May 1. Fine: therm. 66° half-past 2 p.m. 2 Cloudy: rain with
thunder and lightning p.m. 3. Cloudy. 4. Cloudy: rain early a.m. 5. Rain.
6. Cloudy: rain early a.m. 7. Cloudy: rainr.m. 8. Rain. 9. Fine. 10.
Cloudy. 11. Fine: therm. 72° 3 o’clock p.m.: rainr.m. 12. Cloudy. 13. Fine.
14. Cloudy. 15. Fine: therm. 69° 3 o’clock p.m. 16. Fine. 17. Cloudy: rain
-pm, 18. Cloudy. 19. Rain: stormy p.m. 20. Stormy: rain a.m. and p.m.
21. Fine. 22. Cloudy: rain early am. 23. Cloudy. 24—27. Fine. 28.
Cloudy: therm. 79° 3 o'clock p.m.: rainp.m. 29. Fine. 30. Cloudy. 31.
Fine. N.B. This May month has been warmer than any preceding May month
since 1834.
Applegarth Manse, Dumfries-shire.—May 1, Fair and fine: thunder. 2. Driz-
zling afternoon. 3. Fair: frosty: hail. 4. Rainallday. 5. Rain occasionally.
6. Fair and fine. 7. Rain for four hours. 8. Rain p.m.: thunder. 9. Fair
till night: rain p.m. 10. Fair but cloudy. 11. Wet a.m.: cleared up. 12—15.
Fair and fine. 16, 17. Wet nearly all day. 18, 19. Showers a.m., then fine.
20. Showers. 21. Fair and fine. 22. Wet a.m.: fine p.m. 23. Fair but gloomy,
24. Fine summer day. 25, 26. Bright and cool. 27. Parching wind and hot
sun. 28, Fine: rained a little. 29. Fair and fine. 30. Soft rain from eleven
to four. 31. Fine summer day.
roa mpl ii Ws ii cma i a a aaa a a a ld a
‘uvayl |PZ-€ | oP-1/ O1-z| “wing V-PP 2-09 S-8S €8-0F'SE.69 V-2S | 0-89 | 9-69 | 11-62} 002-62) 87-62 | 662-6 | 226-62 | 916.62 | ‘uxayy
“5 | fT | tas | sm fa ts | ab] g9] 99} 6h | 82 |€-29| 9-84] 2-99 | 06-62 | 82.62 | €F-6z | 966-62 | zho.0€ | 990-08 | “1¢
6¢ fee fo “MS | CN |*MN| “MN | GP! €9/5-69) OV | PL | 0-85 | 6-14 |S-19 | 96-62 | Z0-0€ | Ph-6z | 626-62 | 910-08 | gLo.08 | ‘of
SG |" |G0. /€0. | *** | sms juneo| x | smn |f2S| €9| LO] PS | ZL [L291 €.94/2-S9| 00-08 | 00-c€ | gh.62 | 190-08 | 960.08 981-0 | "6%
$9 (O81 | ("| * | OTE | sms jaipea| ms} cass | 09) ZL} 89/ 19 | 0g |8:F9/0-64|£-02 | 06-62 | 08-62 | 02-62 | £68-6z | 8£0-0€ | 900.08 "8
99 | 7° | | €0. | °° | can Jute] “aN | “aN | 1G) gL! 69] 09 | zg |0-09|P-6L\L-1L| $9.62 | $6.62 | SE-6z | £28-62 | 288-62 | 096-6z LEC
z9 sasinnl|ieasrenal|aetete tee | aga ‘a |‘an | ‘ON ‘ov L9|} 19} 89 | 0g |0-S9/0.04|L-L9 | €0-0€ | Z1-08 | 89-62 | SS6-6z | 040-0 OVI-0f | *9%
Wee O.tesezraleamepiese |" 2° ‘a | a | aN] “N | CV) 79 \S-S9| PS | EL |§-SS| 9.02 |S-€9 | Lz-0€ | $%-0€ | 69.6 | EE1-0€ | SOT-0€ | ozz-08 | “cz
j SS |v [cys] ct | sms fonyeo) x | “an | 67 F690] 99/19] o£ |9-€S/€.02|S-€9 | OL-0€ | oT-08 | 19-62 | LET-0€ | Ogt-0€ | zhz.0f “Ps
[HG dere [cee | ee | ee | “< juyeo) as) “s | 67) 19] 9S| OF | SZ |L-€9/z.h9|€-8S | S0-08 | 06-62 | SP-6z | 66-6 | 6ST-0€ | OFo.0€ | “Ez
| VS |“ 120.) 10. | CET. | ms jue) *s | “x | gh) 19| SS| Eh | a9 |G-99/ 9.69 |2.69 | 09-62 | 02.62 | 01-62 | L09-6z | 119-62 ZL9-63 | *3S
@S | 7 (60. |r. | PPO. | ms jujeo] ca | cana |Feh) 699-29} S| 69 | P-8P| L-LO|L-89 | F9.62 | 19.62 | 61-62 | 925-62 | LP9-6z | z0L.60| ‘Iz
eS jo |“ (90. | S20. | sm |-ms|*ms| “m | SPiZoG| PS! 6E | 19 L-0S | 9-66 |3-89 03-62 | €8-8% | S9.8z | £92-6% | 8LS-62 | 8z°.62 | *oz@
GG A100. Gq le a "MAN| S| “S| SH| 8S} ZS) LP | 09 |€-19) L.S9 |€.S9 | $g.gz | 96.80 | LL.8z | 082-62 | 7L9-62 | YOP-60| °61
| VS | |Z0- |zo. | “7 [ms | -m |rms} 8 | oF f0S| 2S| oF | 99 |F-6F10.£0 8-LG 93-62 | G1-6% | 06.8% | 1€S-6% | £S9-62 | 019.6% | “81
| SS op | 110. | | cms [ems toms} slop) 9919.69] Gh | go |€.29]| 0.02 |£-89 | 01-62 | 02-62 | £6-8z | 81S-6z | 269-62 ¥99-6% | “LI
|
.
an
OS {79-0 |“ |" |" |tmsm] em | cms] sass |fop $99! 09] 6 | PZ | 0-67 | 0.99 | LES | 6P-6% | 09-62 | ¥Z-6z | VL9-6% | 116-62 | 896-62) “91
OG pw | pe | wr | ts jupeo sm | es | PH) 6S] 19] oF | PL | L-8F| F.69 \2-69| bg-62 | 00-0 | 65-62 | £P0-0€ | P6I-08 | Phz.08 | “Ct
OV | | pce ft | tats juupea) an] an lf€p §29| SS] ob | So |¢.9F | 9.9 |L-€9| 11-08 | £2.08 | £8-6z | 29z-08 | FOS-0€ | Pab.of | “Fy
OG | | eee | | cms forgo] “aN | “NX | 6£/¥09| 89.1 9€ | 99 G-LV | P-£9 | LSS | 92-08 | Gz-0€ | LL-6z | VIE-0€
OS | “** }S0- | *** | 610+ |*msm |uuyeo| ‘an | “mun | of | 29/¢.99| 68 | zo 0-€9 | L-0L |0-LG | 61-0£ | 90-0€ | $S.6% | 8Z1-0€ | LPZ-0€ | 061-08 | ‘at
Sie: | aston | came “|The em "S |*ms| ‘Ss *s |¥09\f9S| 9) oF | LL | | 8:£9 |%:Z9 | Lg-6% | GL.62 | SP-6z | £00-0€ | PS0-0€ | F60-08 | “11
POG ptf fe te feast tm | ems] s | oF | 9S) 6S] oF | So |0.€9/ €.€9 |z-09 | 09.62 | £2-62 | 06-62 | LIT-0€ | EST-08 | ogt.0€ | ‘oT
| OG | 100. | | PHO. | sms | sm | tas} os | LE) Go lG¢.99| 0S | So | £-Lh 12-22 /€-9S | 09-62 | SL.62 | PP-6z | 900-0€ | £60.08 | 760.08
| VS 08-0 |9€- Ol. | OIL. | *mss | «m | oms}
2
es
19
=a StH SRAD
ise)
wD
=
“UR §
"905 “AOYY
*puo’'y
ture g | UAL Xe “UIA | “XP | “ONAL | xeyy | "Ue 6 sud Fg | sure 6 ‘uy | "xe
*artys ee
OL 86 ; 009" Loy p s *1O4SISaI-J[ag TUE “ule oy
55
* |:uopuo'y -ung|
“UR 6G “AVN
ars a:| —_— pashan |) 18
-sa1uing "YOIMsIY | “00g hoy + uopuoT | ‘aatys-soryUNG a syormstyg = fF MOPMO'L) “uquojy
Pe ileal Pa Y joskeq
*aatys
-satyuind
*uojsog
suopuo'T
‘urd [
YOIAsty)
“yuiod
“MoT “Ul “PULA *JOJOWIOULAIY T, *aJIWOIV
THE ANNALS
AND
MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY.
No. 46. AUGUST 1841.
XLIV.—On Gloionema paradoxum. By the Rey. M. J.
BERKELEY, M.A., F.L.S.
[With a Plate. ]
Tue genus Glotonema has been long considered as consisting
of productions of a very doubtful nature. Some of its species
indeed have been rejected as the ova of insects ; but notwith-
. Standing the communication of Roberge* to the Linnzan
Society of Paris, who is stated to have proved by repeated
experiments that Gloionema paradoxum is not a vegetable, the
species is still retained by Agardh+. Kiitzing{ also, who re-
jects the other species as ova, though he refers to Agardh’s
treatise, and therefore must have known of Rober ge’s expe-
riments, still retains this, and has published it as an alga in
his ‘ Decades.’ Kiitzing, indeed, informs us that he kept his
specimens in water for many weeks or even months without
obtaining any positive result ; and Prof. Nitzsch, to whom he
communicated the production, was hot more successful.
No detail of M. Roberge’s experiments, as far as I am
aware, has as yet been published; I have therefore no hesita-
tion in offering to public notice my own observations, made
at the end of last May, which completely confirm the report
of Roberge, and which must be considered as quite decisive.
I have not indeed had an opportunity of comparing my in-
dividuals with authentic foreign specimens, but they agree so
completely with Kiitzing’s description, that I have not the
least doubt of their identity.
So early as 1825 I found a small patch at Cherry Hinton,
near Cambridge, and communicated a sketch to Dr. Greville.
The production was however considered of so doubtful a na-
ture that it was not published in my ‘ Gleanings of British
Aleze, nor is it included in the English Flora. I did not meet
with it again till May 25, 1841, when I found a large mass
at King’s Cliffe, forming a leosely reticulated mass of tortuous,
very elastic, yellow-green threads, several inches in extent,
* Linn. Soc. Par. 1827, p. 47.
+ Conspectus Criticus Diatomacearum, p. 30.
t Bot. Zeit. 1833, vol. ii. p. 513.
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2G
450 Rey. M. J. Berkeley on Glovonema paradoxum.
suspended near the surface of the water on grasses and aquatic
plants. The threads were of considerable length, sometimes
invested with a transparent gelatinous sheath, sometimes
naked. They contained one or two rows of boat-shaped
bodies, ;8,,ths of an inch long, ;55ths broad, with one ex-
tremity a little broader. The broad extremities all pomted
the same way, except by accidental circumstances a few had
become transverse. The threads, with their gelatinous sheath,
measured ;32,ths of an inch in diameter, without the coat
about >,55ths.
The grains contained a grumous mass, ofa yellow-green co-
lour, surrounded by a rather broad pellucid border. The ex-
ternal surface was perfectly smooth, but the border marked
with little flexuous lines perpendicular to it, which are in fact
seated on a membrane which intimately lines the outer coat of
the grain. A portion of the mass was placed in a glass of water,
and on the following morning a sensible change had taken
place. At one or both ends the contents had contracted,
leaving the outer shell at those points perfectly smooth and
colourless, while the pellucid border still surrounding the
central mass was marked with the above-mentioned lines,
which, if I am not mistaken, are composed of very minute
longitudinally-arranged granules. Meanwhile the grumous
mass appeared more cellular *, with its margin light. In the
afternoon of the same day the larger globules were confined
to the broader or anterior end, while towards the other end
the mass had become paler. Sometimes there were a few
large globules, possibly air-bubbles, between the two mem-
branes at the anterior end. On the following morning a dark
patch appeared in the centre of the mass, and in some indi-
viduals seen laterally this patch was applied to the chord of
the granule, while the upper margin was crenulated. In the
evening of the same day the crenulations had extended to the
dark mass, and the large globules were less visible, while in
some individuals the contents were in motion and the parts
greatly confused. The membrane was soon burst, and a larva
disclosed, most probably belonging to the Tipulide. The
larvee were about twice as long as the eggs, and the posterior
part, when in situ, wrapped in a somewhat spiral way, to allow
of its being packed in so small a compass. On careful exa-
mination of other eggs, I could distinguish the red spots which
mark the place of the eyes, but the whole too confused to
admit of my making an intelligible figure.
The larva consists of thirteen articulations, including the
head, decreasing slightly towards the hinder extremity. The
* This accords with the observations of Dumortier, Pouchet, &c., on the
cellular formation of the vitellus.
Rev. M. J. Berkeley on Exotic Fungi. 451
last articulation, however, is not so strongly marked as the
rest. The head is large, ovate, with two red eyes in front,
and two short, conical, obscurely-articulated antenne; the
mouth is furnished with two strong maxilla, which, when the
animal is at rest, are completely retracted and out of sight.
The first articulation of the body is furnished with two short
feet, crowned at their extremities with a few short bristles.
Down the centre of this and the following articulations is a
dark line, marking the situation of the intestines. ‘The last
joint is also furnished with two short conical feet, or append-
ages crowned with short bristles, and a conical projection in
the centre, crowned with about eleven pellucid cilia, which
are undoubtedly the temporary lungs. I have frequently seen
the animal comb them out with his large maxilla. On each
side of the branchial tubercle is a short conical appendage.
I must leave entomologists to decide the affinities of the
little larva, and must beg them to pardon any errors in my
description of it. I did not witness any further change, as
the larve soon died, and the mass became clothed with mu-
cedinous filaments.
EXPLANATION OF THE FIGURES IN PLATE XIII.
a. Portions of filaments, with eggs magnified.
1. Appearance of an egg, highly magnitied, soon after the specimens
were brought home.
z Ditto on the following morning.
4. Ditto at six o’clock p.m.
5
6.
7. Ditto with the articulations strongly marked, and the dark mass (= vi-
tellus) which furnishes the intestines.
8. Larva just burst from its shell.
* + Ditto the next morning at twelve.
XLV.—Supplement to descriptions of Exotic Fungi in * Annals
of Nat. Hist.,’ vol. iii. pp. 322 and 375. By the Rev. M. J.
BerKELEY, M.A., F.L.S.
Since the publication of the two memoirs cited above on the
Exotic Fungi in the collection of Sir W. J. Hooker, the dis-
covery of a packet of Dr. Richardson’s Arctic Fungi which had
been mislaid, and the publication of Fries’s ‘ Epicrisis,’ who
had received many of the species from Klotzsch, makes it
necessary to give a short supplement. I have also to thank
Dr. Montagne for one or two suggestions, of which I have
availed myself in the following notes :—
1. Lentinus villosus, |. c. p. 322 = L. fasciatus, Berk., Hook.
Journ. of Bot. v. il. p. 146. t. 5.
2. Polyporus vesparius, |. c. p. 323. The specific name, as
Dr. Montagne very properly remarks, is too near that of Pol.
2G
452 Rey. M. J. Berkeley on Exotic Fungi.
vespaceus, Pers., equally with which it belongs to the genus
Hexagona, Fr. I beg therefore to substitute for it Hewagona
3. Pol. dedaleoides, |. c. p. 325, belongs to the genus Tra-
metes, Fr., therefore it will stand as Trametes dedaleoides.
4. Dedalea applanaia, \.c. p. 381 = Ded. Palisoti, accord-
ing to Dr. Montagne, who remarks that this species and D.
repanda vary from two inches to a foot in diameter, and have
the stem lateral, eccentric, or even central.
5. Dedalea aspera, |. c. = Lenzites aspera, nob.
6. Dedalea latissima, |. c. p. 382 = D. sinulosa, Fr. Ep.
p- 495.
7. Dedalea discolor, |. c. = Lenzites Klotzschii, nob. Pi-
leo sessili, suborbiculari, tenui, pluri-zonato, pallide ligaeo
demum subbrunneo, glabro, sub-nitido, plus-minus ruguloso.
Hymenio obscuriore; lamellis tenuibus, rigidis, subintegris,
antice furcatis, postice sinuoso-porosis.
Pileus 1—2 inches in diam. On oak. Allied to Lenzites
betulina. Dedalea discolor, Fr., is a true Dedalea.
8. Pol. Wightii, \. c. p. 383 = Hexagona Wightii, Fr. Ep.
This is referred in my paper to Pol. sinensis, Fr., but it ap-
pears erroneously. Fries informs us that the species which I
have called Pol. Klotzschii is preserved in old Swedish her-
baria as Bol. favus, L., but according to Klotzsch, Bol. favus
of the Linnean herbarium* is Hex. tenuis. Dr. Montagne
informs me that he has Pol. Klotzschii from Cuba, and that
he also has regarded it as new. Pol. Klotzschii, Berk., must
therefore be now considered as Trametes sinensis, Fr.
9. P. sericeo-hirsutus, 1. c. p. 384 = Hexagona sericea, Fr.
Ep. p. 497.
10. P. fraxineus, |. c. p.389. The only specimen of the spe-
cies thus marked in Dr. Richardson’s collection is certainly not
P. fraxineus, but I think a young specimen of P. fomeniarius.
11. P. obtusus, Berk. |. c. p. 3890 = Trametes obtusus, nob.
12. P. subcinereus, Berk. 1. c. p.391 = Pol. adustus. Iam
obliged to Dr. Montagne for this correction.
13. P. biformis, |. c. p.392. The two fungi which I regarded
as what Klotzsch intended here, are named by Fries Pol. arc-
ticus and P.pergamenus. Fries, however, had received some-
thing else under the name of P. biformis, with which I am
not acquainted. The short observation added to Klotzsch’s
characters belongs to P. arcticus and P. pergamenus.
14. P. occidentalis, |. c. p. 393 = Trametes occidentalis,
Fr. Ep.
* Since the above was in type I have examined the specimen and find
that it is named by Sir J. E. Smith; it is therefore no authority for Bol.
favus, L. It is certainly Hex, tenuis.
Rey. M. J. Berkeley on Exotic Fungi. 453
15. Nidularia striata, var. pusilla = N. plicata, Fr., accord-
ing to Dr. Montagne.
The following species were not included in the list: —
16. Trametes stuppeus, n. s. Apus, suberosus, pileo dimi-
diato, convexo, azono, stuppeo-villoso, ochraceo-fulvo; intus
hymenioque ligneo-pallidus ; poris magnis, 5—6 angulatis, dis-
sepimentorum acie tenuissima. Pileus 2} inches broad, about
1 inch long, clothed with long, dingy, pale, ochraceous tawny,
tow-like down. Pores 1th of an inch across, deep behind,
shallow in front towards the acute margin.
Carlton House, N.A, Ap. 23. Dr. Richardson. Resem-
bling Trametes gallica, but very distinct. The surface of the
pileus resembles that of Pol. leoninus.
17. Pol. hyperboreus, n.s. Ungulatus, durus, ponderosus ;
pileo glabro concentrice sulcato; disco brunneo, margine ob-
tuso, pruinoso, cervino; intus pallide cervino. Hymenio
convexo «tate angustato, umbrino ; poris minutis rotundis.
N.A., Dr. Richardson. Allied to P. igniarius, ligneus, and
australis, but certainly distinct. The substance is equally
hard, but of a much paler hue. Pileus 2 inches long, 4 inches
broad, 2 inches deep, marked with a few concentric furrows ;
the older portion brown, the margin pale fawn-colour. Hy-
menium growing narrower with age.
18. Pol. badius, n.s. Crassus, durus, subponderosus, ba-
dius, intus ferrugineus; pileo parce concentrice sulcato, mi-
nutissime ferrugineo-tomentoso, demum glabrato; hymenio
levi, poris mediis angulatis, dissepimentis tenuibus.
N. A., Dr. Richardson. A very distinct species, with far
larger pores than those of Pol. igniarius, with which it agrees
in size, and to which it is allied. The surface of the pileus is
in parts even and cracked, in parts rough, with small corru-
gations. ‘The flatness of the hymenium probably arises from
the specimen having been fixed by the vertex.
19. P. lilacino-gilvus, Berk.
A single specimen found by Dr. Richardson agrees exactly
with the species from Van Diemen’s Land, but is in a very
early stage of growth. I saw this species in M. Desmaziéres’
herbarium, marked “ Pol. versicolor, var. incarnata, regu par
M. Fée du consul de France au Brazil an 1826.” It is pos-
sibly the same then with Pol. Feei, Fr., Linn. v. p. 518.
20. Pol. varius, Fr., N. A., Dr. Richardson.
21. Pol. ferruginosus, Fr., N. A., Dr. Richardson.
22. Exidia glandulosa, Fr., N. A., Dr.Richardson.
23. Nidularia striata, Bull., N. A., Dr. Richardson.
24. Lycoperdon pertusum, Sow. Br. Fung. t. 412. f. 2. Sub-
globosum, peridio tenuissimo, membranaceo, furfuraceo-granu-
loso, demum lacunis plurimis irreguiaribus pertusum. Capil-
454 Prof. Don on Plants of Lycia and Caria
litio pallido. N.A., Dr. Richardson. About the size of a
hazel-nut. Sporidia globose, equal in diameter to that of the
flocci. Precisely the plant of Sowerby, except that his species
is figured with a spurious stem. It is clearly no Rhizopogon,
as asserted by Fries.
XLVI.—A List of Plants collected by Charles Fellows, Esq.,
during his Tour in Lycia and Caria; with descriptions of
the New Species. By Davip Don, Esq., Prof. Bot. King’s
College*.
N.B.—Those to which an asterisk is affived are new species, and will be
found described at the end.
DICOTYLEDONES vy. EXOGEN.
RANUNCULACES.
Clematis cirrhosa, L.
Anemone coronaria, L.
apennina, L.
Adonis estivalis, Z.
Ficaria verna, Huds.
BERBERIDES.
Bongardia Rauwolfii, C. dA. Mey.
PAPAVERACER.
Papaver somniferum, L.
orientale, ZL.
Argemone, L.
Glaucium flavum, Crantz.
Reemeria hybrida, DeCand.
Hypecoum procumbens, L.
FUMARIACES.
Corydalis tuberosa, DeCand.
Fumaria capreolata, L.
parviflora, Lam.
CRUCIFERZE.
Erophila vulgaris, DeCand.
Alyssum fulvescens, Sm.
Fibigia clypeata, Med.
Aubrietia deltoidea, DeCand.
Arabis verna, Br.
Cardamine hirsuta, L.
Diplotaxis tenuifolia, DeCand.
Brassica Rapa, L.
CISTINER.
Cistus cymosus, Dun.
salvifolius, L.
Helianthemum arabicum, Pers,
VIOLARIES.
Viola tricolor 0, DeCand.
CARYOPHYLLE.
Silene Behen, L.
vespertina, L.
orchidea, L.
linoides, O/th.
Dianthus prolifer, L.
Holosteum umbellatum, L.
LINE#.
Linum angustifolium, Sm.
hirsutum, L.
GERANIACE.
Erodium cicutarium, Sm.
ciconium, Willd.
gruinum, Willd.
Geranium tuberosum, L.
molle, L.
lucidum, L.
RuTAcEz.
Ruta bracteosa, DeCand.
RHAMNER.
Rhamnus oleoides, Z.
Paliurus aculeatus, Lam.
* From Mr. Fellows’s ‘Account of Discoveries in Lycia, &c., 1841,’ a
work of the highest interest for the valuable and original information which
it contains upon ancient art, history, and philology, as well as the present
state of the country.
collected by Charles Fellows, Esq. 455
EupPHoRBIACES.
Euphorbia dulcis, L.
rigida, Bied.
Mercurialis annua, L.
Ricinus communis, L.
TEREBINTHACESR.
Pistacia Lentiscus, L.
LEGUMINOS#.
Anagyris feetida, Z.
Calycotome villosa, Link.
Anthyllis tetraphylla, L.
Lotus creticus, L.
Melilotus sulcata, Desf.
Trifolium fragiferum, L.
spumosum, L.
subterraneum, L.
procumbens, L.
Hymenocarpus circinatus, Savi.
Medicago orbicularis, All.
——-. uncinata, Willd.
—— minima, Lam.
marina, L.
Psoralea bituminosa, L.
Colutea arborescens, L.
Coronilla iberica, Bieb.
minima, L.
Faba vulgaris, Mench.
Vicia onobrychoides, L.
polyphylia, Desf.
hybrida, L.
Lathyrus Cicera, L.
angulatus, L.
Pisum fulvum, Sm.
Lupinus hirsutus, L.
Cercis Siliquastrum, L.
RosacE&.
Poterium spinosum, L.
TAMARISCINES.
Tamarix gallica, L.
CucURBITACEE.
Bryonia dioica, L.
PARONYCHIES.
Paronychia argentea, Lam.
CRASSULACE.
Umbilicus pendulinus, DeCand.
UMBELLIFERA.
Scandix australis, L.
Caucalis daucoides, L.
Tordylium officinale, L.
Smyrnium perfoliatum, L.
RuBIACEZ.
Asperula arvensis, L.
Galium brevifolium, Sm.
V ALERIANES.
Valeriana Dioscoridis, Sm.
ComPposiIT%.
Tussilago Farfara, LD.
Inula candida, DeCand.
limoniifolia, Lind.
Asteriscus aquaticus, Mench.
Anthemis arvensis, ZL.
rosea, Sm.
Achillea cretica, DeCand.
Chrysanthemum segetum, L.
coronarium, L.
Senecio squalidus, L.
Gnaphalium luteo-album, L.
Helichrysum angustifolium, DeC.
Calendula arvensis, L.
Carduus crispus, L.
Centaurea montana, L.
Jacea, L.
Tragopogon porrifolius, L.
CAMPANULACES.
Campanula drabifolia, Sm.
STYRACER.
Styrax officinale, L.
OLEACE.
Phillyrea latifolia, L.
JASMINE.
Jasminum fruticans, L,
APOCYNEE.
Vinca minor, Z.
CuscuTEz.
Cuscuta epithymum, L.
BoraGINEZ.
Myosotis sylvatica, Hoffm.
Lithospermum orientale, Willd.
Anchusa italica, Retz,
456
Anchusa tinctoria, DL.
undulata, L.
Cynoglossum officinale, Ih
Mattia staminea, Rem. & Schult.
Onosma echioides, L.
Echium plantagineum, L.
creticum, Sm.
SoLANACES.
Mandragora officinarum, Beriol.
Hyoscyamus niger, L.
agrestis, Kit.
aureus, L.
VERBASCINER.
Verbascum Thapsus, L.
ScROPHULARINER.
Veronica cuneifolia*.
triphyllos, L.
grandiflora*.
Cymbalaria, Vahl.
Linaria pelisseriana, DeCand.
Anarrhinum bellidifolium, Desf.
Scrophularia peregrina, L.
canina, L.
OnroBANCHEZ.
Orobanche caryophyllacea, Sm.
LABIATR.
Teucrium regium, Schreb.
Lavandula Stzchas, L.
Lamium moschatum, Mill.
purpureum, L.
Phlomis lycia*.
Salvia triloba, L.
Horminum, L.
Prof. Don on Plants
of Lycia and Caria
PRIMULACEZ.
| Anagallis arvensis, a et /3, L.
Cyclamen persicum, L.
PLANTAGINES.
Plantago cretica, L.
CHENOPODIACEA.
Salicornia fruticosa, L.
POLYGONER.
Rumex bucephalophorus, L.
—— Acetosa, L.
ELZAGNEE.
Eleagnus angustifolia, L.
|
|
THYMELEZ.
Daphne collina, L.
argentea, Sm.
Passerina hirsuta, L.
LAURINES.
Laurus nobilis, L.
PLATANES.
Platanus orientalis, L.
BALSAMIFLUZ.
Liquidambar orientale, Mill.
CUPULIFERZ.
Quercus Ballota, Desf.
coccifera, L.
—— Aigilops, L.
CoNIFERZ.
Pinus Pinea, L.
carica*.
Laricio, Lam.
Cupressus sempervirens, a et /3, L.
Juniperus communis, L.
MONOCOTYLEDONES v. ENDOGEN 4.
GRAMINE#.
Briza maxima, L.
Stipa tortilis, Desf.
Xgilops ovata, L.
MELANTHACEZ.
Merendera Bulbocodium, Ram.
LILIACcEz.
Fritillaria Meleagris, L.
Lloydia greca, Endl.
Gagea spathacea, Rem. & Schult.
Hyacinthus orientalis, L.
Muscari moschatum, Willd.
comosum, Willd.
botryoides, Willd.
Bellevalia romana, Lapeyr.
Scilla bifoha, L.
Allium nigrum, L.
neapolitanum, Cyr.
—— triquetrum, L.
junceum, Sm.
Aloe vulgaris, Sm.
Ornithogalum umbellatum, L.
collected by Charles Fellows, Esq. 457
Ornithogalum nanum, Sm. Trichonema Columne, Reichenb.
Myogalum nutans, Link. Gladiolus communis, L.
Asphodelus ramosus, L. segetum, Kit.
Asparagus acutifolius, L.
OrcHIDE.
SMILACER. Orchis papilionacea, L.
Smilax aspera, L. provincialis, Balb.
Ruscus aculeatus, L. longibracteata, Biv.
longicornis, Desf.
r DroscorEace2. | Ophrys fusca, Link.
Tamus cretica, L. Tenoreana, Lindl.
— mammosa, Desf.
Ferrum-equinum, Des/.
Narcissus Tazetta, L. | Serapias Lingua, L.
cordigera, L.
AMARYLLIDES.
IRIDE. |
Iris florentina, L. AROIDES.
Sisyrinchium, L. Arum Dracuncuius, L.
tuberosa, L. Arisarum vulgare, Schott.
ACOTYLEDONES vy. ACROGEN A.
Ceterach officinarum, Willd.
Cheilanthes odora, Sw.
Adiantum Capillus Veneris, L.
FInices. LICHENES.
Polypodium vulgare, L. Evernia prunastri, Ach.
DESCRIPTIONS OF THE NEW SPECIES.
Veronica cunetfolia.
Y. glanduloso-pubescens; racemis axillaribus, segmentis calycinis
oblongis obtusis corolla brevioribus, ovario suborbiculato scabro,
foliis subsessilibus cuneatis inciso-crenatis, caule suffruticoso pro-
cumbente.
Habitat in Lycie rupibus ad Arycandum fluvium.
Fruticulus procumbens, ramosissimus, V. savatili partum major.
Rami filiformes, purpurascentes, foliosi, fragiles, pube brevissima
glandulosa vestiti. Folia opposita, brevissimé petiolata, cuneata,
inciso-crenata, coriacea, avenia, utrinque pubescentia, scabriuscula,
subtis costa prominente subcarinata, 2-3 lineas longa, sesqui v.
2 lineas lata. /Petioli pubescentes, vix lineam longi, latiusculi,
supra canaliculati, subtts obtusé carinati, ima basi subconnati.
Racemi in ramis solitarii, axillares, multiflori, pedunculati. Pedun-
culus folio longior, filiformis, glanduloso-pubescens, purpurascens.
Bractee pedicellis capillaribus longiores ; inferiores inciso-crenate,
foliis consimiles ; superiores subspathulate, integerrime. Calyx
copiosits glanduloso-pubescens, 4-partitus : segmentis oblongis,
obtusis ; 2 anterioribus majoribus. Corolla V. sazatilis, cyanea ?
calyce major: tubo brevissimo, violaceo: limbo 4-partito : laciniis
rotundatis, integris, venulosis; infimd duplO angustiore. Stamina
corolla breviora: filamenta filiformia, glabra, violacea: anthere
LYCOPODIACER.
Lycopodium denticulatum, L.
458 Prof. Don on Plants of Lycia and Caria
subrotunde, biloculares, flave. Ovarium compressum, orbiculare,
asperé pubescens, integrum. Stylus capillaris, glaber, corollam
superans. Stigma capitatum, exiguum.
This is a very distinct and well-marked species, with the
habit of V. saxatilis, but there is none with which it can be
confounded, and if introduced to our gardens it would prove
an interesting addition to the rock-work. Its cuneiform,
deeply crenate leaves, and rough pubescent fruit will serve
to distinguish it from sawatilis, as well as from every other
shrubby species.
Veronica grandiflora.
V. annua, erecta, glanduloso-pubescens ; floribus solitariis, segmentis
calycinis linearibus obtusis, corolla calyce tripld longiore : laciniis
rhombeo-ovatis subunguiculatis, foliis inferioribus petiolatis ovatis
crenatis ; superioribus sessilibus, pinnatifidis tripartitisve.
Habitat in Caria ad Meandrum fluvium, et prope Mylasam. Foret
Martio.
Radiz fibrosa, annua. Caulis erectus, filiformis, simplex v. ramosus,
copiosé glanduloso-pubescens, purpurascens, bipollicaris. Cotyle-
dones adhuc persistentes, subreniformes, integerrime, petiolate.
Folia inferiora brevissimé petiolata, ovata, obtusa, crenata, 3-5
lineas longa, utrinque pilis brevissimis articulatis, at rard glandu-
liferis, copiosé vestita ; superiora sessilia, pinnatifida v. tripartita :
segmentis linearibus, obtusis, integerrimis ; terminali majori, sub-
spathulato. ores in apice caulis axillares, solitarii, pedunculati.
Pedunculi capillares, copiosé glanduloso-pubescentes, foliis tripar-
titis ter longiores. Calyx copiosé glanduloso-pubescens, 4-partitus :
segmentis linearibus, obtusis ; 2 anterioribus majoribus. Corolla om-
nium maxima, diametro semuncialis et ultra, cyanea: tubo bre-
vissimo, luteo: Jimbo profunde 4-partito: /aciniis rhombeo-oyatis,
obtusis, basi angustata lutea subunguiculatis ; anticd minore. Sta-
mina corolla multoties breviora; filamenta gracilia, glabra, lute-
scentia: anthere cordato-oblongz, obtuse, violaceze. Ovarium sub-
rotundum, glabrum, integrum. Stylus corolla longior, capillaris,
glaber, superné incrassatus, subclavatus. Stigma parvum, subca-
pitatum. Capsulam nondtm vidi.
A truly elegant little plant, well deserving of being added
to the catalogue of ornamental annuals, from the size and
beauty of its flowers. Its deeply pinnatifid and tripartite
leaves, with entire linear or spathulate segments, will readily
distinguish it from the V. amena of Steven, and from V. pu-
mila, from Mount Hzemus, described and figured in the se-
cond volume of Dr. Clarke’s Travels, at page 559.
Phlomis lycia.
P. fruticosa, ferrugineo-tomentosa; foliis cordato-oblongis obtusis,
verticillastris plurifloris, bracteis lanceolatis calycibusque mucro-
collected by Charles Fellows, Esq. 459
nato-spinosis densé albo-lanatis, dentibus calycinis uncinatis, fila-
mentis inappendiculatis.
Habitat in Lyciz septentrionalis sylvis montosis.
Suffrutex erectus, ramosus, pedalis, pube stellata rubiginosé undique
densé tomentosus. Rami 4-anguli. Folia petiolata, cordato-ob-
longa, obtusa, crenata, rugoso-yenosa, utringue tomento stellato
copiosé vestita, pollicem longa, semunciam lata ; floralia vix cor-
data. Petioli angusti, 3 lineas longi, supra canaliculati. Verti-
cillastri terminales, pluri- (6-8) flori. Bractee adpressz, lanceo-
late, mucronato-spinose, land longissima molli alba densé vestite.
Calyces bracteis vix longiores, extis albo-lanati : fauce pilosissima :
dentibus brevibus, subulatis, mucronato-spinosis, apice nudis, unci-
natis. Corolla subuncialis, calyce vix dupld longior : tubo glabri-
usculo, inferné angustato, superné parim dilatato, intis fasciculis
5 pilorum aucto: fauce intis glabra: limbo extts tomento fasci-
culato-ramoso flavicanti subadpresso vestito ; Jabio superiore ga-
leato, margine truncato, emarginato ; inferiore longiore, trilobo ;
laciniis lateralibus ovatis, obtusis, conduplicatis, supra glabris ;
intermedid orbiculata, integra, supra glabra, margine partm undu-
lata. Filamenta compressa, inappendiculata puberula. Anthere
glabre. Stylus glaber. Stigma bifidum; lobo superiore latiore,
obtuso ; inferiore acutiusculo, parim longiore.
This plant, Mr. Fellows informs me, is common in moun-
tainous woods in the northern parts of Lycia. It is evidently
nearly allied to the P. ferruginea of Tenore, but its lanceolate,
spinously mucronate, woolly bractes, simple filaments, and
subulate, spinous, uncinate calycine teeth, essentially distin-
guish it from that species as well as from P. armeniaca.
Pinus carica.
P. foliis binis prelongis tenuissimis rectis margine denticulato-sca-
bris : vaginis abbreviatis subintegris, strobilis ovato-oblongis rectis
levigatis : squamis apice rhomboideis depressis truncatis rimulis-
que radiatis.
Habitat in Cariz montibus.
Arbor magna. Ramuli scabriusculi, fusci. Folia bina, erecta, recta,
tenuissima, mucronata, nunc levitér tortilia, leté viridia, subtis
convexa, levia, nitida, supra canaliculata, margine denticulato-
scabra, 6—7-pollicaria: vagine 2-3 lineas long, cylindracee,
fuscescentes, annulatim rugose, ore subintegro nudiusculo. Squame
stipulares (folia primaria) lanceolate, acuminate, coriacez, spa-
dicez, margine filamentoso-ciliate, basi diu persistenti. Strobili
ovato-oblongi, obtusi, recti, levigati, nitidi, spadicei, 3-4 pollices
longi, diametro 2-unciales : sguamis apice depressis, rhomboideis,
planiusculis, transversé subcarinatis, rimulis radiatim notatis, me-
dio truncatis, areola transverse elliptica cinerascenti umbilicatis.
I have ventured to propose this as a distinct species, al-
though, from its near relationship to halepensis, I think it not
unlikely that it may prove to be only a remarkable local form
of that species. It is chiefly distinguished from halepensis by
460 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany.
its much longer leaves and larger cones, the apex of whose
scales are broader, and marked with numerous radiating fis-
sures. The leaves are double the length of those of the mari-
tima of Lambert, and the cones are larger and more oblong.
XLVII.— Report of the Results of Researches in Physiological
Botany made in the year 1839. By F. J. Meyen, M.D.,
Professor of Botany in the University of Berlin.
[ Continued from p. 407. ]
In the large and splendid works on Fungi which have been
published by M. Corda in the past year, we find some obser-
vations which are of interest as regards the physiology of
these productions. In describing a mould* called Gonatobo-
trys simplex, he says, that in the lower vegetable orders we
often see forms represent a lower form of a more highly
developed species ; and that in the meeting at Prague (1837)
he had directed attention to a considerable number of such
types which frequently form parallel series, and endeavoured
to show that in the inferior Fungi especially mathematical
combinations can be formed if symbols are substituted for
the separate organs of the mould or fungus; and that each
of the members of the series of combinations produced by the
combination of these symbols represents one of those groups
of forms which we have hitherto been accustomed to regard
as types of genera. M. Corda promises to explain these se-
ries, both historically and theoretically as well as practically,
in a separate work, and hopes that the moulds of the tro-
pical regions may afford several new groups which will fill
up the place of the now missing types. In this work M.
Corda has also given a plate with figures of Syzygites mega-
locarpus, and a full description of the formation of the fruit,
which, as is well known, is here accompanied by the phzeno-
menon of copulation; he observed that the two pyriform
warts from which the fruit is produced not only touch each
other, but completely coalesce, so that the contents of both
can mix as soon as the partitions between them are absorbed.
After the junction of these two branches follows the forma-
tion of the fruit ; in the middle of these connate branches are
formed one or two cells, which represent the sporangiolum,
which in a ripe state is covered with large angular warts.
This sporangiolum contains a thick fluid consisting of oil-glo-
bules, molecules, and from two to five spores. Frequently
the two branches do not join, and then a spherical sporangi-
olum is formed at the apex of one or even of both of them.
* Prachtflora der europiischen Schimmelbildungen mit 25 Tafeln, 1839.
A notice of this has been given by us in vol. iv. at p. 200.
Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 461
M. Corda never saw the sporangium of this curious fungus
fall off or open, and the seeds when sown did not succeed.
Finally, M. Corda remarks, that the copulation of these
fertile branchlets has been compared to that of certain Con-
fervee, but that this comparison, on a critical examination of
both cases, does not appear to be very correct. I also have
compared the copulation of Syzygites with that of the Conferve,
and after I have carefully examined all the kinds of copula-
tion which have been observed in Confervee and Closteriz, I
cannot imagine how M. Corda can make such a statement ;
it evidently arose from the fact that M. Corda has not exa-
mined the phznomena of copulation of the Algz with as much
diligence as he has those of the mould, for, particularly in
Closteria, the phenomena are quite similar ; and in the Spi-
rogyre I have also seen that the usual spore produced by co-
pulation again appeared as a sporangiclum, and contained se-
veral smaller spores, &c.
More important for us are the contents of the third volume
of figures of Fungi* which M. Corda has published ; we find
therein new researches on the genus 4icidium, which is not
as yet correctly understood. M. Corda refers “cidium to
the true Gasteromycetes, on account of its peridium: he
sowed the spores of Aicidium Tussilaginis on leaves of the
Colt’sfoot, which were kept moist, or were immersed in water,
and he often succeeded in making them germinate ; they de-
veloped on the spore-skin, by means of extension, a wart,
which became a cellular filament, producing threads in every
direction, as is the case with the spores of all Fungi. By de-
grees a fibrous net, or tissue, is formed cut of these threads,
similar to that produced by the spores of Fungi, Algz and
Moss; these are said to be true germinative threads, and M.
Corda says he has seen them penetrate through the stomata
of the epidermis into the parenchym of the leaf, and then com-
mence dividing into branches.
Botanists will readily perceive the importance of these
statements: the propagation of the Leaf-fungi has not yet been
observed, but a number of hypotheses have been invented to
explain it; these will, however, all be done away with, if M.
Corda’s statement, that the germinative threads of the spores
of Aicidium pass into the parenchym of the leaf through the
stomata, is found to be correct. M. Corda saw, moreover,
that the little heaps of Mcidium, with their cellular stroma,
are fastened on laterally to one of the bundles of vessels in
the leaf. These points are illustrated by excellent figures.
The larger half of the volume treats of the Hymenomyceta,
to which M. Corda reckons not only the Helvellacee, Pezize
* Icones fungorum, &c., tom. iii, Prag. 1839. Noticed by us at p. 145, vol. vi.
462 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany.
and Tremelline, but also the Tubercularine and Coryneacee:
however, according to the later observations on the mode of
production of the spores, it is absolutely necessary to separate
the Octosporidee from the true Hymenomycete with free spores.
It is, however, to be desired that this family of Fungi should
receive another name, for the sporangia of the large Spherie
are also filled with eight spores, and their appearance has
much similarity with that of the sporangia of the Pezize, etc.
In speaking of the Pezize we have a description of the for-
mation of the spores, from which it appears that the spore-
skin is formed round the drops of oil which are found with
larger and smaller grains in the asci. Here we also have a
new theory of the formation of cells, which the spores of the
Fungi, according to M. Corda, represent.
M. Corda treats very circumstantially of the structure of the
hymenium in the true Hymenomycete, and he endeavours to
show that the honour of the first exact observations on this
subject belongs to him ; for in the winter of 1833-34 he had
sent to the Academy of Sciences of Berlin a treatise ‘On the
Structure of the Spores of Cryptogamic Plants,’ accom-
panied with many figures, in which both the free quaternate
spores, the antheridiz, the spore-cuticle, the spore-nucleus
and the oily globules, are described and delineated. The
greater number of the members of the Academy are said to
have thought highly of this work, but the greatest micro-
scopical observer of Germany declared these observations to
be incorrect: the free quaternate spores were false; the an-
theridiz (and partly also the basidia) were, according to his
observations, eggs of insects, &c. In the former Reports for
1836, p.51—55, and 1838, p. 167, I have given a historical
view of the observations made in this department, and I
mentioned M. Corda’s discoveries as published in the ¢ Flora’
of 1833; however, according to the above, M. Corda shortly
afterwards published a new work (that read in the Academy),
which certainly gives him the justest claims to the confirma-
tion and extension of Micheli’s observations; and if his as-
sertions could be confirmed by a member of the above-men-
tioned Academy, they are certainly to be put before those
of M. Léveillé ; the latter, however, states that he had com-
municated his results ten years ago to Persoon and others*.
* [Ascherson appears to have been the first who made any general exa-
mination of the naked spores of Hymenomycetes. Insulated figures and
observations were made by several who did not understand the full import-
ance of the facts before them. Corda certainly had no general notions on
the subject when he figured in 1837 the structure of Coprinus. In the
same year analyses of several true Agarics are given by him in Sturm’s
Deutschland’s Flora, which repeat still the generally received erroneous no-
tions as to their structure.—Ebir. ]
Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 463
In the description of the hymenium the three usual layers are
mentioned, and a circumstantial description of the lacteous
vessels which are found in some of the Agaricini is given; a
splendid figure of these vessels, with the whole hymenium of
Agaricus fetens, gives the best information on this subject.
In Ag. fetens, says M. Corda, there is found between the cells
of the two different cellular systems (namely, the layer of tubes
and that of spherical cells) a third system, which is interwoven
with the others, and which consists of perfect, branched and
anastomosing narrow tubes, which have walls proper to them,
and contain a milk-like, half transparent, white granular sap,
which appears to move slowly in the direction of the tubes.
M. Corda believes he may truly say that he first clearly de-
scribed and delineated this vascular system in the Fungi, for
the drawing which M. Schultz has given of Agaricus deliciosus
is very confused and unnatural. These lacteous vessels pass
through all organs and tissues of Agaricus fetens ; they are
equally distributed, only the gills and the outer layer of the
stipes appear to contain more of them. The tubes are clear,
almost always of equal thickness, generally serpentine and
much branched: and often the cells of the large-celled paren-
chym are deposited in rays around the lacteous vessels, and
surround them for some distance with a cylindrical layer of
cells. Where these vessels approach the surface of a gill
they send out peculiar, long, blind (closed) branches, which
form with their conical ends the outermost layer of the gill
and hymenium. ‘The structure and formation of the organs
of fructification are then fully described: the female ones are
called, according to Léveillé, basidia ; they consist of the body,
the spore-supporters (Sterigmata of M. Corda, an appellation
which has, however, already been used.—M.), the contents
and the spores. The formation is the same as given in the
former Report, p.54. ‘ Every sporophore,” says M. Corda,
“produces always but one spore at once, and afterwards se-
veral one after the other, exactly in the same manner as the
terminal points of the fertile flocci of the Hyphomycete.”
Whether this assertion is grounded on actual observations
is not stated; and I must beg leave to doubt that the for-
mation of spores at the point of the spore-bearer is repeated
after the first spores have fallen off. The spores consist, ac-
cording to M. Corda, of a cuticle, a nucleus, and of oily glo-
bules, and where the spores are terminal they have a conical,
pointed or blunt perforated wart, and this opening has been
formerly called Hylus, window, navel, etc. Spores with the
hylus at the side are to be called spore pleurotrope, and
those which have the hylus in the axis, spore trepanotrope ;
and M. Corda promises to show at a future period in what
464 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany.
relation an orthotropic ovulum stands to a trepanotropic spore,
&e. The oil-globules in the spores are composed, according
to M. Corda’s analysis, of fatty oil in large quantities and an
acrid etherial oil.
M. Corda also asserts, that in 1833 he pronounced the
antheridia of the fleshy Fungi to be anthers, and I have shown
in my last Report, that these bodies were first mentioned as
generative organs by Bulliard: M. Corda is quite wrong in
saying that I stated these organs to be paraphyse, for such
an idea never entered my mind. We have, however, often
drawn attention to the curious fact, that the so-called anthers,
if they really do effectuate the fertilization of the spores, do not
appear more frequently and constantly ; and to this M. Corda
replies, that there are whole families among the Cryptogams
where only spores are found. We may, however, say that this
objection does not apply to the Fungi, for we at present know
that in those families where male organs have been found,
they make their appearance in all genera and all species; in
the Fungi on the contrary, and let us only consider the pilei-
form and fleshy Fungi, these organs do not appear regularly
in two very similar species.
M. Corda moreover compares these fungus-anthers with the
single pollen-grains of the higher plants, and not with the an-
thers, a view held probably by most botanists who have written
on this subject; he calls them Pollinaria, a denomination
which has already been used in quite a different sense. One
statement of M. Corda is very remarkable and worthy of fur-
ther examination, viz. that the Boledi, during the development
of the anthers, have no trace of the basidia and of the forma-
tion of spores, and that these are principally formed when
the anthers are almost fully developed. [In Agaricus and Po-
lyporus I have formerly directed my attention to this subject,
but have not observed anything which could lead to this con-
clusion; and in some species of Boletus it is not uncommon
to find fully-developed anthers in old, decaying individuals. |
M. Corda correctly remarks, that the paraphyses of the Asco-
mycete are not to be compared to the anthers of the above-
mentioned Fungi. ‘The contents of the anthers are composed,
according to M. Corda, of a consistent jelly, which sometimes
contains molecules, but sometimes has no distinguishable
structure; it is emptied in drops through the point of the
cellular sac, and then covers the external surface with a layer
of gum, which is often slightly coloured; by means of this
substance the spores adhere: whether however, says M. Corda,
this fluid fecundates the spore, cannot be ascertained.
Mr. Berkeley* has examined the structure of the fruit-bear-
* Ann. Nat. Hist. Nov. 1839, p. 155,
Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 465
ing organs in the Trichogastre and Phalloide, and found that
these groups also belong to the true Hymenomycete. If a
young plant of Lycoperdon is cut through, the internal fleshy
mass is found to be intersected by small, long, retiform,
branched and anastomosing cavities, whose whole surface is
covered by an hymenium, which is similarly constructed to
that of Boletus and Agaricus, but does not possess a trace of
those organs which have been called anthers. Mr. Berkeley
thinks that the genera Geastrum, Scleroderma, Batarrea, Tu-
lostoma, etc., have a similar structure. In Phallus very young
individuals must be examined if we wish to find the hyme-
nium; it appears exactly as in Lycoperdon, only the basidia
appear all of them to carry spores. If there be more than
four spores on one basidium the additional ones are placed
laterally. Here, as well as in Lycoperdon, the basidia collapse
and are not to be found at a later period.
In our former Report* we mentioned a treatise of M. Lé-
veillé’s which had been laid before the Philomathic Society at
Paris in 1837; it is now publishedt, although apparently a
little altered; moreover there are unfortunately no figures,
which are absolutely necessary to illustrate M. Léveillé’s
views. M. Léveillé contends against the idea of Turpin, that
the Uredines are produced from diseased Globuline, by which
name M. Turpin means all sap-globules of plants, however dif-
ferent they may be in their chemical composition. Moreover
M. Léveillé condemns the view of M. Unger according to which
the Uredines are produced by a diseased affection of the respi-
ratory organs ; for, according to the author’s observations, they
are true fungi, among which Persoon placed them. When,
says M. Léveillé, these productions are observed in a very
young state, there are seen under the discoloured epidermis
very fine colourless ramified filaments which are interwoven
with each other. When a Uredo is formed, there appears in
the centre of this woven mass a fleshy spot or point, which may
be compared to a Sclerotium, &c. &c; one surface of this
nucleus reposes on the parenchym of the leaf, the other is in
contact with the epidermis, and is covered with pedunculated,
or more rarely with sessile spores. As the fungus increases
the epidermis is extended and bursts, and the spores are ex-
posed. The cidia, although possessing a more complicated
structure, have a similar process of development, which M.
Léveillé describes in that of Euphorbia; the peculiar peridium
* Berlin, 1838, pp. 162, 163.
+ Recherches sur le développement des Urédinées.—Ann. des Se. Nat.
tom. xi. part. bot. p. 5—16.
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. 2H
466 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany.
distinguishes this genus from Uredo, so that they cannot both
be comprehended under the name of Ceoma. M. Léveillé re-
marks, that Fries has rightly observed the difference between
Uredo and Aicidium.
M. Leveillé says the granules of Uredo are generally consi-
dered as spores, but observations to prove this are very rare :
M. Prevost was the first who saw that a byssus-like tissue
was produced from spores of Uredo caries, De C., when ex-
posed to moisture, and M. DeCandolle has made the same
observation. [Even if the production of germinal filaments
from the vesicles of the bunt [Schmierbrand] has really been
observed, which I have as yet not succeeded in doing, still
my own observations on the production of the bunt in Mays
(see Report, 1838, p. 162.) show that it is a diseased forma-
tion in the interior of the cells, and may be regarded as a true
Entophyte.| M. Léyeillé also mentions the production of the
bunt in Mays, and says that it is also produced by ramified
filaments which are short and jointed, and from these the
brown spores separate themselves, &c. [Did M. Léveillé
mention these observations in 1837 ?]
Finally, there is a division of the Uredines into three smaller
families: 1. dicidinee, with the genera Restelia, Reb. ; Atci-
dium, Pers.; Peridermium, Link, and Endophyllum, Lév.
2. Uredinee with Phragmidium, Link ; Puccinia, Pers.; Uredo,
Pers.; Podisoma, Link, &c. 3. Ustilaginee with Ustilago,
Link; Sporisortum, Khr., &c.
Mr. W. Valentine* has laid before the Linnzan Society his
observations on the structure and development of the organs
of reproduction of Pilularia globulifera: they contain much
interesting matter, and it is to be hoped the treatise will soon
be published with delineations.
M. Alexander Braun+ laid before the Meeting at Frei-
berg his observations on the germination of the spores of
Marsilea quadrifolia. The fruit of Marsilea he considers as
a part of the leaf on the stalk of which it is seated. The nerva-
tion [ Berippung] of this fruit-leaf is pinnate, and on the side-
ribs are formed the placentz which bear the sporangia, which
are of two kinds, and each sorus is covered with a closed in-
dusium, &c. According to this view, the formation of fruit
in Marsilea is similar to that of the Ferns, and these, as well
as the Equisetee and Lycopodia, would then bear their spo-
rangia on the leaves, herein differing from the Mosses.
* Annals of Nat. Hist. June 1839, p. 260. Linn. Trans., vol. xviil. p. 483.
+ Flora von 1839, p. 297.
Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany. 467
M. Braun* has also communicated his ideas on the growth
of the Ophioglossee, particularly with regard to the cellular
body from which the leaves are produced. This body is said
to surround the centre of formation, and within it the leaves
are produced in regular spiral succession until they unfold,
which they do in the fourth year in the case of Oph. vulyatum.
The spike of Ophioglossum is axillary. Botrychium does not pos-
sess this inclosing cellular body, but the leaves have a sheath.
In the Report of 1837+, the observation of M. Martens was
mentioned, according to which hybrid forms are found among
the Ferns ; the new hybrid which M. Martens has observed,
was called by Bory de St. Vincent Gymnogramma Martensii,
and was said to be intermediate between G. calomelanos and
G. chrysophylla. Mr. J. Riley { of Nottingham has made an
excellent reply to this assumption of M. Martens, although
he appears not to know that many botanists believe that the
anthers of Ferns have been discovered, a subject which was
discussed in the former Report, 1836, p.104. Mr. Riley con-
siders this supposed hybrid as G. sulphurea, Desv., and gives
very sufficient reasons for supposing the formation of hybrids
in the Ferns as altogether improbable.
Mr. G. Dickie § has published some remarks on the appear-
ance of amylum in plants; he notices particularly that in the
Lichens; but it was unknown to him that many decisive ob-
servations have been already made on this subject. Mr. Dickie
assumes that all those parts of Lichens which are coloured
blue by iodine are amylum, and he found that even the spo-
rangia (thecze) are coloured blue; he compares the sporangium,
with the spores which are produced therein, with the structure
of the amylum globules; this however is founded on Raspail’s
description of the structure of Amylum, which is erroneous.
M. G. Korber|| has chosen as the subject for his inaugural
dissertation a very circumstantial description of the green cells
of the thallus of Lichens ; these are the peculiar cells which
Wallroth calls gonidia, and Meyer germinal grains.
The author has given the various statements of the two
above-mentioned lichenologists with all possible brevity and
clearness, has criticized them, and sometimes added his own
views, which are grounded on observations of nature. The
gonidia were observed in three different stages: 1. as gonidia
* Flora von 1839, p. 301.
+ See Mr. Francis’s translation: London, R. and J. E. Taylor, 1839, p.81.
t Reply to M. Martens’s Paper on the Hybridity of Ferns. Proc. of the
Bot. Soc. of London, 1839, p. 60.
§ Annals of Nat. Hist. 1839, p. 165.
{| De Gonidiis Lichennm. Diss. Inaug. Berolini, 1839.
2H 2
468 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany.
synthetica in statu primario seu primitivo, that is, when they
were still in the thallus in their natural position ; 2. as gonidia
synthetica in statu secundario, 1. e. when they have risen above
the surface of the thallus and form soridia, the appearance of
which in the different genera is described. Finally, 3. the
gonidia are considered as reproductive organs. What Wall-
roth and Meyer have observed on this subject is correctly
stated to be not satisfactory’; and the author describes his own
experiments, which were made with great care in order to
observe the germination or development of the gonidia, which
however were all unsuccessful. It is to be hoped that M.
Korber will continue his observations, for with the help of
our improved microscopes, there is doubtless much in this field
which remains to be discovered.
Mr. Valentine* has communicated to the Linnzan Society
his observations on the development of the organs of fructifi-
cation of Mosses ; they contain, however, nothing that has not
been already made known. Mr. Valentine draws attention to
the analogy between the spores of Mosses and the pollen-
grains of higher plants.
Dr. Stiebel+ has written a treatise on the Oscillatoria which
is full of discoveries. According to his observations, the Os-
cillatorie are not only animals, but they possess also per-
fectly-formed heads; they have a mouth, and when the Ly-
sogonium, which Dr. Stiebel has described and delineated, lies
on its back, it opens its mouth so that it assumes a triangular
form. Out ofthis mouth there comes a rostrum, which moves
rapidly in the water and creates a vortex; it moreover pos-
sesses muscles, which spring from the lateral margin of the
animal. Generally at one end, or in young animals even at
both ends, are seen very peculiar tentacula or feelers which
execute a motion like that of oars ; they assume different forms
for the support of the rostrum and determinate purposes, and
exhibit a nerve. In the member which is connected with the
head-end is a kind of stomach with black hooks, which are
perhaps masticatory organs, and the bag of the stomach is
continued on like a rectum. The animal appears to live upon.
small monads. Moreover the animal has at both ends pro-
jecting shining globules with black dots; these are the eyes,
which can be turned round like snails’ eyes, and have a nerve.
The Lysogonium did not appear to have two rostra, although
* Annals of Nat. Hist. 1839, p.456. Linn. Trans., vol. xviii. p. 499.!
+ Uber den Bau und das Leben der griinen Oscillatorie Lysogonium
teniodes Stieb— Museum Senkenbergianum III. No. I. Frankfurt a M.
1839, pp. 79—90.
Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany 469
it has two heads. The propagation takes place in several ways ;
sometimes the first joint is as it were vomited (ausgespieen),
&c. The description of the muscles of the eyes and feelers,
as also of the nervous system, Dr. Stiebel intends to give ata
future period.
I have perused the above treatise* several times, but cannot
determine whether it is meant as a hoax or in earnest—the
former appears most probable; for with any microscopical
practice the above observations could certainly not have been
made with so excellent an instrument as Dr. Stiebel possesses.
Notwithstanding the wonderful description, it is quite evident
that Lysogonium is only an Oscillatoria whose structure M.
Stiebel has altogether mistaken; he did not even see the fine
rings which lie between the spores like the so-called intercel-
lular substance, and which, when the spores escape, either
separate or still adhere to each other. These rings however
have led Dr. Stiebel quite astray, even the eyes have arisen
out of them. What other philosophers have considered as the
head of Oscillatorie Dr. Stiebel has not seen, for in Lysogo-
nium, which appears to be Oscillatoria limosa, there is nothing
of the kind.
In the Report for 1835 I have already mentioned the genus
Chionyphe which M. Thienemann has observed in granular
snow. We have now a full description of those interest-
ing plants, which must be classed with the Alge, but de-
cidedly belong to different generat. ‘Three species are de-
scribed ; namely, Chionyphe micans, nitens and densa, and the
whole genesis of C. nitens is given. The development of this
plant is quite similar to that of other jointed Conferve. M.
Thienemann observed at first on the snow simple spherical
vesicles, which extended lengthwise and became divided in
halves by a partition, after a lively movement of previously
invisible atoms had taken place in their interior. The halves
of the divided vesicle kept increasing, and constantly when
the molecular motion again appeared, another division took
place, but subsequently only the terminal cell of each side was
divided, while the central ones merely extended themselves.
Finally, a lively molecular motion arises in these terminal
cells; the atoms enlarge and appear like vesicles which cause
the terminal cell to swell, so that when ripe it forms a head
filled with germinal globules. I must remark, that the for-
mation of the partitions during the above-mentioned molecular
motion, as well as the production of the spores by the enlarge-
* The figures are very beautifully executed, and can scarcely be alto-
gether imaginative.—Ep.
+ Uber ein neues Geschlecht von Schneepflanzen Chionyphe.—Nov. Act.
Acad. ¢c. L, C. vol. xix. part 1. pp. 20—26.
470 Meyen’s Report for 1839 on Physiological Botany.
ment of the atoms in the terminal cells, does not agree with
previous observations made on this subject, and that a repe-
tition of them is therefore necessary.
M. Morren* has also observed infusoria in the interior of
the bags or tubes of Vaucheria clavata; it was Rotifer vul-
garis, and he therefore believes that the animal formations
which M. Unger had also seen in this plant, may also have
belonged to the same animal. I may here remark, that the
appearance of animals in the interior of the Vaucherie@ was
first observed by Vaucher; they were the Cyclops Lupula,
Mill. ; and in 1834 M. Wimmer observed living infusoria in
Vaucheria, which, from the short description, appear to have
been Radiata ; even the eggs of this animal were observed.
How these animals got into the interior of the Vaucherie
has not been observed by any one: indeed M. Morren asserts
that his plants were not at all injured ; there were no openings
in them through which the animal could enter. M. Morren
observed the lively motion of the Rotifer in the interior; he
saw how it ran along the sides, pushing the green matter
away from it, &c.; he saw the deposition of eggs and the in-
crease of the animals, and it appeared to him that they then
descended in the tubes and remained in the new mass, where
they cause, like parasitic bodies, those excrescences on the
sides of the Vaucheria, just in the same manner as insects
produce the gall-nuts. Once M. Morren opened the Vaucheria
and let the animal come out, but it tried to return into its
old prison.
M. Wimmer fF has continued his observations on the above
subject as well as on the development of the spores of Vau-
cheria clavata, and will shortly publish his results.
In the Carlsbad Almanac for the past year there is a
paper by M. Corda:—“ Observations sur les Kuastrées et les
Cosmariées.” The greater part is full of violent replies to the
numerous attacks which Ehrenberg has made on M. Corda
in his large work on Infusoria{. M. Corda is much dissatisfied
with the manner in which his systematic labours, his accurate
observations, and his accurate drawings, as he denominates
them, have been treated by M. Ehrenberg ; and he endeavours
* De l’existence des Infusoires dans les plantes.—Bullet. de l’Acad. R.
de Bruxelles, VI. No.4. Ann. Nat. Hist. vol. vi. p. 344.
+ Jahresbericht der schlesischen Gesellschaft fiir vaterlindische Kultur,
1839, p. 123.
t+ I must here remark that these Euastree and Cosmarieé are not In-
fusoria, as M. Ehrenberg also states, but simple dlge, as I have sufficiently
proved in my latest work to all those philosophers who are acquainted with
the structure of d/gz@. M. Corda up to the winter of 1833 also held them
to be plants.
Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida. 471
to show that Ehrenberg has been guilty of the greatest arbi-
trariness. In the last nine pages we have a view of the ge-
nera which M. Corda has made for his family of the Euastree
and Cosmariee ; and all botanists who have occupied them-
selves with observations on this subject, will be somewhat
surprised at the by no means small number.
[To be continued. ]
XLVIII.—Descriptions of new or little known Arachnida. By
Mr. Apam Wuirte; Assistant in the Zoological Depart-
ment of the British Museum.
Havine been favoured by Mr. Darwin with the whole of the
extensive collection of Arachnida, made by him on the voyage
of H.M.S. Beagle, I intend describing them occasionally in
this journal, as well as several others from Van Diemen’s
Land, collected by Mr. Gunn. From Mr. Bracy Clarke I
have received a collection of spiders made by him in Switzer-
land during his travels and residence there in 1798, along
with MS. notes drawn up at the time; Mr. Swainson, before
setting out for New Zealand, also kindly gave me a bottle of
spiders from St. Vincent’s, collected by the late Lansdowne
Guilding. They are all preserved in spirits of wine, as spiders
should always be if possible, and, to some of Mr. Darwin’s,
notes are occasionally added, which I have that gentleman’s
permission to extract from his copious manuscript journal *.
I describe them without any systematic order, but having
necessarily numbered each species, intend afterwards giving
a classified index: the descriptions are in many instances
prolix, and I have in most cases given the generic character
of each species. I have done this because, at present, I am
unwilling to propose new names if I can possibly refer the
species I describe to any of the established genera. I need
hardly say, that in spiders the colours are so fugitive, that
unless notes or even drawings are taken from live speci-
mens, but little dependence is to be placed on the colours
assigned in descriptions taken from the best-preserved speci-
mens}. Travellers should be particular in doing this, as well
as in taking notes of their habits, whether land or aquatic;
whether they hunt for their prey by running after it—jump-
ing upon it—or whether they conceal themselves in holes,
* These notes, there is no use saying, were always made amid the hurry
and bustle of a campaign in which annulese animals formed but a small
part of the subjects of research. I prefer giving them as I find them, as
there is a freshness about them which would be rubbed off were I to attempt
to improve them.
+ For an example, see the first description (Linyphia argyrobupta).
4479 Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida.
tubes, or cells made by themselves, and should also describe
the nature of these abodes when possible; whether they
wander about without any fixed residence, walking or running
sideways; whether they make a web or threads for entrapping
their prey, or whether they are sedentary, constructing close
webs, or extending them with regular geometric accuracy or
in irregular large meshes*. Spiders are frequently found in
a very “perfect state in several of the nests of the fossorial
Tlymenoptera. Mr. Abbot mentions, in the notes accompany-
ing his unpublished drawings of Georgian Annulosa, that
Pelopai are the best spider-collectors he ever met with, and
save the arachnologist a great deal of trouble, as he has fre-
quently found, in the nests of these insects, species he has
been unable to meet with elsewhere,—the specimens in the
most beautiful condition, as the Spider-wasps do not kill,
but in some way paralyse with their stings the destined food
of their young; and were British arachnologists to look into
the nests of our native Pompili, “rare captures” might often be
made. As the note alluded to is very interesting, I transcribe it
here verbaiim from the original in the British Museum. Those
who have consulted Walckenaer’s first volume, and know how
much science is indebted to Abbot for his discoveries of new
species of Arachnida, will excuse its length. Drury (IIL. 1.
pp- 105, 106) and Darwin (Journal of Researches, p. 40)
mention similar instances. “ Sphea lunata, Fab. (Pelopeus
lunatus, Fab. Syst. Piez.), called in Savannah Black and Yel-
low Mason, and likewise Dirt-daubers: they make oblong
cases of clay, which they plaster in layers to roofs, ceilings,
and other convenient places; when finished they lay an egg
inside at the end, then fill it with spiders and plaster them
up. The worm (larva), by the time it eats them all, is full fed,
and spins round itself a thin case like gold-beater’s skin, in
which it changes into chrysalis ; it begins to build in May and
continues all the summer. What is remarkable, they have the
art to embalm these spiders alive, or rather enchant them.
Upon opening one, the spiders are alive, but unable to walk or
make the least resistance, being just able to move a little,
sometimes a leg, and they appear plump and (of a) fresh co-
lour. I imagine they do this by stinging the spiders: this is
a wonderful property and provision of nature to provide the
worms with fresh and proper food as long as is needful.
Upon putting some of these spiders in a box, they continued
plump and fresh several days before they began to alter. One
* Remarks of this kind or of a similar nature would often prove ex-
tremely interesting, as the Baron Walckenaer has shown that in most
cases the family may be ascertained by the habit, and vice versd the habit
by the family.
Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida. 473
fly continues to build several cells alongside and upon each
other: they destroy an amazing number of spiders ; they com-
monly put all, or the most part of one particular species toge-
ther in one cell, many of them of very rare species, and such
I imagine must live chiefly on the tops of branches of the
loftiest trees, as I could never afterwards meet with these spe-
cimens of spiders. Upon opening several of these cases at
once, it affords (as you may judge) a most curious and pleasing
sight—such a large number of spiders of the most beautiful
colours and rarest species. Could it be possible still to con-
tinue to preserve them in their beauty and freshness, they
would make a wonderful collection of natural history.” It
is much to be desired that the other volumes of BaronWalcke-
naer’s elaborate work were published*. I may add, that spe-
cimens of all the species here described, unless otherwise in-
timated, will be found in the collection of the British Mu-
seum, and that I have made figures of most of them, which
I intend to publish hereafter.
1. Linyphia (Leucauge) argyrobapta, n.s.
Brownish yellow; chelicera darker, at end blackish brown; claws
black. Abdomen silvery, with five brownish black (when alive
red) longitudinal lines all meeting at the end, the middle one
alone taking its origin from the base, and having a lineolet of
the same colour extended nearly to the lateral black line, and
two small approximating parallel lines directed backwards, ari-
sing from about the middle, and extending to the irregular line
on each of its sides; the end of the abdomen, where all the
lines meet, is brownish black, and there are two distinct silvery
spots; the body beneath is brownish black, with a whitish line
on each side, and a dot beneath it.
Chelicera vertical, oblong, cylindrical, shining; first joint with
one or two teeth at end, upon which the long hooked claw
closes inwards; this claw is straight at the base and then
hooked.
Eyes eight, on two transverse lines ; four placed in the middle, the
two posterior further apart; the side eyes of last lines are in
airs.
Maxillec dilated at end, the outside with a few hairs.
Palpi slender ; fifth joint as long as second, ending apparently in
a claw, and hairy.
Mentum small, not very distinct from the heart-shaped sternum.
Cephalothorax depressed, narrowed in front, dilated on the side,
sinuated behind, with a deep impression beyond the middle, in
front of which are two impressed lines directed sideways, and
extending forwards to the base of the narrowed part.
* July 2. Since this paper was written the 2nd volume of Walckenaer’s
work has been published.
474 Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida.
Abdomen oblong, smooth, or, at most, only shagreened, with four
distinct spinnerets.
Legs, at least first two pairs, very long.
Ourspecimen, in this respect, was much mutilated: in Mr. Darwin’s
MSS. I find that the first pair of legs is much the longest, then
the second and fourth, and that the third is shortest.
‘“Web very regular, nearly horizontal, with concentric circles ;
beneath, but sometimes above, the concentric web, there is an
irregular or thin tissue of network; the animal rests in the
centre, on the inferior surface: abdomen brilliant; the red co-
lour like a ruby with a bright light behind.” ‘The subgeneric
name is one proposed for it in Mr. Darwin’s MSS.—Brit. Mus.
Hab. near Rio de Janeiro. May 1832. Charles Darwin, Esq.,
F.R.S., etc.
2. Linyphia (?) leucosternon, n.s.
Body and sternum shagreened ; the sternum and body above gray-
ish white ; body beneath grayish black, spotted with white (there
are four principal spots in the middle).
Cephalothorax, palpi and legs yellowish, the joints of the latter
darker ; cephalothorax behind margined with whitish ; the sides
hairy : claws of chelicera port-wine colour: eyes black.
Chelicera short, swollen, smooth, nearly of equal breadth through-
out, with a few (8) teeth inside at the end, and armed with a
short strong claw folding inwards.
Eyes eight, not very unequal in size, arranged in two transverse
lines, the first bending outwards and shorter than the second ;
the lateral eyes are the closest and oblique; the two central of
each line form nearly a square.
Maxille somewhat spatulate.
Palpi with the second and fifth joints nearly equal, the fifth being
somewhat hairy at end, and apparently terminating in a short
claw.
Mentum semioval.
Sternum cordato-sagittate.
Cephalothorax narrowed and truncated in front, dilated and nearly
as broad as abdomen behind; this is of a long, oval shape, over-
lapping the cephalothorax at the base. The legs are long and
slender ; first pair the longest, then the second, the third being
much shorter than the fourth.
Spinnerets distinct.
Hab. Brazil, near Rio de Janeiro. C. Darwin, Esq.
3. Epeira (Singa*) leucogramma, n. s.
Cephalothorax ferruginous; space about the eyes dark brown;
body and legs grayish brown, darkest on the sides of the body ;
body above with three white longitudinal lines proceeding from
the base and terminating just before the tip; the middle one
* A subgenus founded by Koch, with the beautiful European Epeira
Herii of Hahn as the first species. (Uebers. des Arachnidensyst. p. 6.)
Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida. 475
somewhat interrupted ; all three are margined with black, which
is deepest (thickest) at base; beneath with two abbreviated,
somewhat distant, longitudinal white lines margined with black;
legs ringed with black.
Chelicera vertical, rather longer than they are broad (at base),
smooth, somewhat swollen, armed with an incumbent short
claw. ;
Eyes eight, arranged transversely in two lines; the first very
short, containing two eyes; the second, with two in the middle,
forming nearly a square with those of first line, which square
is on a projection of the cephalothorax ; the two lateral eyes are
so close together that they seem as one; they are placed some-
what behind the middle pair, and are somewhat further re-
moved from them than these are from each other.
Maxille short, rounded; base giving insertion to palpi, which
are weak, and have the fourth and fifth joints nearly equal ;
(fifth armed with a minute claw ?).
Mentum short, rounded, distinct from the heart-shaped sternum.
Legs short; last pair the longest ; third shorter than the first and
second, which are nearly equal in length.
Cephalothorax longish, narrowed in front, and not much more
than half the width of the abdomen, which is of a fine oval
shape.
Hab. Brazil, near Rio de Janeiro. C. Darwin, Esq.
4. Tetragnatha bicolor, n. s.
Legs, cephalothorax and palpi brownish yellow (in some the palpi
are dark brown) ; body shagreneed above, griseous, with three or
four indistinct brownish lines; a lighter band on the side, be-
neath darker; two greenish gray lines run down the middle,
parallel to each other till just before the spinnerets, where they
somewhat converge ; eyes black.
In the male the abdomen is nerved or shagreened with brownish,
and is not so distinctly marked beneath ; a brownish line, some-
what interrupted, and emitting a few equal, narrow, brown li-
neolets directed backwards, runs down the middle.
Chelicera large, very prominent, loose, smooth, subcylindrical, as
thick at the end as at the base, and only slightly gibbous on the
inner edge, which is furnished with a double row of tooth-like
processes, upon which the strong and long claw folds inwards ;
this claw is more than half the length of the first joint, and at
base is straight, and then suddenly bent.
Eyes eight, placed on two lunated parallel lines: the two inter-
mediate of the first line smallest and closer to each other than
they are to the side-eyes of the same line, while the two inter-
mediate eyes of the second line are somewhat more distant from
each other than they are from the side-eyes of the same line.
Maxille oblong, somewhat bent outwards at the end, which makes
the outer margin sinuated; the inner margin is clothed with a
476 Mr. White on new or little known Arachnida.
line of short thick-set hairs; the maxille approximate by their
inner edge.
Palpi slender, with the second joint curved, and rather longer than
the fourth and fifth, which are nearly equal; the last jomt seems
to end in a claw, and is rather hairy : in the male the fifth joint
is dilated on its under side; at base there is a smooth, roundish,
globular process ; sternum longish heart-shaped, sides some-
what irregular.
Cephalothorax of a long, slightly depressed oval shape, which is as
broad as the abdomen at base.
Abdomen long (two-and-a-half times the length of the cephalo-
thorax), narrow, subcylindrical ; at base somewhat swollen, the
swollen part overlapping the end of the cephalothorax ; at the end
it tapers abruptly, being roundish and slightly recurved: it is
covered with close and short hairs.
Legs slender ; first pair the longest; second as long, if not a little
longer than the fourth; the third pair is very short, half the
length of the second; one of the joints is somewhat swollen
and curved.
Hab. Van Diemen’s Land. R. Gunn, Esq.
Walckenaer figures two species, argentea and zorilla, both with a
longish oval body. Guérim (Encycl. Méth. x. sub voce) alludes to
two or three other species of this genus, from Africa and America,
and Koch describes two others in his ‘ Uebersicht,’ (p. 5) ; but this
is, I believe, the first species described as coming from Van Diemen’s
Land. As will be seen in the description, there are some characters
which would constitute it, at least, another section of Latreille’s
genus, if not a subgenus.
5. Eripus heterogaster, Walck. Thomisus heterogaster, Latr.
Guérin, Iconogr. Arachn. pl. I. fig. 4.
«« Evidently, by its structure and habits on the leaf of a tree, this
species is a Laterigrade ; it differs, however, most singularly from
that tribe, and is, I think, a new genus.
«« Anterior eyes red; maxilla rounded, inclined; mentum thinly
arrow-shaped ; chelicera powerful, with large aperture for
poison ; abdomen encrusted with five conical peaks; thorax
with one small one ; crotchets to tarsi very strong.
“Colour snow-white, except tarsi and half of leg bright yellow ;
the tops of the abdominal points and line of eyes black : it must,
I think, be new. Taken in the thick forests near Rio de Janeiro,
May 1832.” Darwin’s MSS.
Salticus (Homalattus*) pustulatus, n. s.
Upper side black, with greenish reflections.
Eyes eight, on short elevations of thorax ; may be considered as
placed on three lines, two of which are approximate, the third
* Homalattus, a new subgenus, now proposed for the first time ; the legs
are unfortunately destroyed.
Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. 477
being distant ; the first line, which is somewhat bent, contains
four eyes, placed on the front margin of the cephalothorax at
nearly equal distances from each other; the two intermediate
eyes are much the largest. ‘The second line contains two very
minute eyes, somewhat removed from the edge of the thorax ;
they are placed rather nearer the outer eye of the first line than
the outer is to the intermediate; the third line contains two
eyes, one on each side the margin of the thorax, the space be-
tween the outer eye and the first line being equal to the distance
between the outer eyes of the first line.
Cephalothorax flat, transverse, not so wide as the body, covered
like it with papillz.
Abdomen as broad as long; in front straightish ; behind somewhat
pointed, the sides rounded; it is flat and compressed, and
somewhat convex above.
Hab. Sierra Leone. Rev. D. F. Morgan.—Brit. Mus.
Pholcus geniculatus, n. s.
Body above yellowish, with at least twelve blackish brown spots,
eight in the centre, arranged in pairs, and decreasing in size as
they approach the apex: sternum and broad line down the
centre of body: beneath blackish brown ;: legs reddish yellow ;
at the first jomts ringed with blackish and pale whitish yellow;
last joint pale, without two blackish rings.
Maxille of a long triangular shape, and almost meeting over the
mentum; the palpi proceed from the nearly right angle at base,
and have the terminal joint much shorter than the fourth and
second, which are almost equal in length.
The mentum seems somewhat square.
Cephalothorax nearly circular, rather broader than long, somewhat
truncated behind, and deeply impressed in middle ; it is as wide
as the longish oval abdomen: legs very long and slender, nearly
smooth, except last joint; first longest ; third shorter than second
and fourth, which are nearly equal.
Hab. Brazil, near Rio de Janeiro. C. Darwin, Esq.
XLIX.—Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. By Wm. Tuomp-
son, Esq., Vice-Pres. Natural History Society of Belfast.
OF the few vertebrate animals treated of in the present com-
munication, one only can be announced with the certainty
that is desirable, as Irish: the others are noticed to induce
further attention to them, and at the same time to enable any
one interested in the subject to form his own opinion respect-
ing the propriety of their introduction, even with doubt, into
the Fauna.
Mammalia.
Mus messorius, Shaw? Harvest Mouse. May 12, 1838.—Mr.
Adams, gamekeeper at Shane’s Castle Park (co. Antrim), mentioned
478 Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland.
to me what he had heard of a remarkably small kind of mouse and
its nest ; the description of which would apply to this species. The
nest was built nearly as high from the ground as the narrator’s
knees, and suspended between stalks of wheat, in a field of this grain :
the old animals scarcely bent the stalks of wheat when running up
them. The observer, a schoolmaster and farmer, resident within a
mile of Shane’s Castle, related the above to Mr. Adams as an extra-
ordinary fact which had come under his notice last autumn.
AVES.
Falco Groenlandicus, Linn., Hancock. Greenland Falcon. Ina
letter from John Vandeleur Stewart, Esq., dated Rockhill, Letter-
kenny, Feb. 3, 1837, I was favoured with a minute description of a
bird in his collection, believed to be an Iceland Falcon. At the
meeting of the British Association held at Newcastle in 1838, Mr.
John Hancock of that town read a paper (admirably illustrated by spe-
cimens in various states of plumage) with the view to show that the
Iceland and Greenland Falcons are distinct species. ‘This was sub-
sequently published in the second volume of the ‘ Annals of Natural
History.’ On referring to the description of Mr. Stewart’s bird, I
felt certain that, according to Mr. Hancock’s views, it must be the
F.. Groenlandicus, and having submitted the description to this gen-
tleman, I had the satisfaction of receiving his testimony to the same
effect.
Pyrrhula Enucleator, Temm.? Pine Bullfinch. In the manuscript
journal of that eminent naturalist, John Templeton, Esq., is the fol-
lowing note.—‘‘ December 20, 1819. Yesterday heard from Mr.
Montgomery of Belfast [a discriminating ornithologist], that Mr.
Bradford had received a specimen of the Lovia Enucleator which was
shot at the Cave-hill [vicinity of Belfast], and on showing the figure
in the Naturalist’s Miscellany, he recognised it to be the bird.”
Coracias garrula, Linn.? Roller. For some years I have hada
note from Mr. R. Ball to the effect that—In the middle of September
1831, when he was walking through the demesne at Carton—the
seat of the Duke of Leinster—his attention was attracted by a bird
pursued by a great number of Rooks, which, instead of flying off to
avoid them, continued for a considerable time, or so long as he had
patience to remain, to dash in amongst them apparently for the sake
only of annoyance. From the size, brilliant plumage, and singular
flight of this bird, my friend was satisfied of its being a Roller. Mr.
Walker of Granby Row, Dublin, states that one of these birds, shot
in the county of Sligo some years ago, was preserved for a relative
of his who resides there. Another Roller has been mentioned to me
as obtained in the South of Ireland some years since, but as yet no
example of the bird unquestionably killed in this island, has to my
knowledge come under the inspection of the naturalist.
AMPHIBIA.
Lissotriton palmipes, Bell? Palmated Smooth-Newt. On ques-
tioning Mr. William McCalla of Roundstone, Connemara (a most
Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. 479
intelligent collector of objects of natural history), respecting the spe-
cies of Newts observed by him, he replied—‘“‘ I am positive of there
being two species of Triton in this country, one of which is the 7.
punctatus of Jenyns’s ‘ Manual,’ and the rarer with us; the more
common species is by far larger and of a richer colour ; it is nearly
double the size of T. punctatus; the crest is far larger and is not
notched ; the feet are webbed. ‘To convince you that I have not
confounded the young and adult of the same species, I may state
that I observed them in the breeding season, and met with females
of both species.” A fair inference from these remarks, I think, is
that Lissotriton palmipes is the animal alluded to. My correspond-
ent had not seen Mr. Bell’s work on British Reptiles.
Pisces.
Scomber maculatus, Couch? Spanish Mackerel. Mr. McCalla
having mentioned the occurrence of this fish on the coast of Conne-
mara, replied to my queries as follows :—‘‘ The fish which I consi-
der to be this, is found with the Mackerel, and, in some seasons, not
uncommonly. It is known by the name of Spanish Mackerel, which
was no doubt first applied to it here by the Coast Guard, many of
whom have been in the navy. I have not seen any specimens of S.
maculatus this year (1840), but on carefully looking to the charac-
ters given by Couch (Jenyns’s ‘ Manual’) am of opinion that it is
the above species. I am quite positive that we have two species of
Scomber on this coast. Curanz trachurus has been scarce here this
ear.
a. Silurus Glanis, Linn.? Sly Silurus. That this species has in a
single instance been taken in Ireland I am disposed to believe on the
following testimony. On inquiry (October, 1840) of William Blair,
who has for many years been fisherman, etc. at Florence Court, whe-
ther he had ever met with any rare fish, he described an extraordi-
nary one, of which he could never learn the name, that he took
twelve or thirteen years ago in a tributary of the Shannon, near its
source, and about three miles above Lough Allen. His description
was so graphic and particular, that Lord Enniskillen on hearing it
immediately suggested its applicability to the Si/urus, and on Yar-
rell’s figure being shown to the intelligent captor of the specimen, he
at once identified it as in all respects representing his fish, except in
the head and mouth not being large enough. Professor Agassiz,
who was present, on being appealed to, stated, that these parts were
certainly not represented of sufficient size in the figure. The fish
was seen struggling in a pool in the river after a flood, and ‘‘ with the
long worm-like feelers from its mouth ;” and its general appearance
was luoked upon asso hideous that the persons who first saw it were
afraid to touch it. The specimen was at least 24 feet in length, and
8 or 9 lbs. in weight. Although unfortunately ‘lost to science,” it,
for two or three years, or until the skeleton fell to pieces, adorned a
bush near the scene of its death. The species was not known as an
inhabitant of any of the neighbouring waters by the persons of the
district.
480 Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland.
The distribution of the Silurus Glanis on the continent of Europe
is somewhat anomalous, as I learn from M. Agassiz. In Central
Europe it is found in the lakes of Neuchatel, Bienne, and Morat
only :—in no other lakes or rivers connected with the Rhine does it
occur. It inhabits the rivers flowing into the Baltic and Black Sea.
Mo.uvsca.
Tritonia bifida, Flem., Brit. Anim.
Doris bifida, Mont., Linn. Trans., vol. xi. p. 198. t. 14. f. 8. Au-
gust 25, 1840.—An individual of this species taken by Mr. Getty
and Mr. Hyndman, when dredging in Belfast Bay, was brought
to me. It agrees critically with Montagu’s description, except
in the following points. ‘There are just 12 appendages on each
side, three of which are larger than the rest, but placed at un-
equal distances from each other on both sides, and not opposite
as shown in Montagu’s figure. ‘The colour is better defined
than in the figure; the marginal line, whence the appendages
issue, is strongly marked and reddish, as they likewise are ; foot
plain flesh-colour.
The animal is extremely agile, and planaria-like is one mo-
ment twice the length it is the next; it often moves about with
the foot upwards, and in its motions several times had the long
tail thrown quite under the head.
Melibea fragilis, Forbes, Malacologia Monensis, p. 4. pl. 1. fig. 4.
July 20, 1840. Three examples of this species were taken on
Antennularia antennina, dredged in Clew Bay (co. Mayo), by
Mr. R. Ball, Mr. Forbes, and Mr. Hyndman.
Kolidia Zetiandica, Forbes, Atheneum, 1839, p.647. July 29,1840.
This species was taken by Mr. Forbes and myself between tide-
marks at Lahinch, county Clare.
Euplocamus pulcher. (See Annals Nat. Hist., vol. v. p. 91. note.)
Tergipes pulcher, Johnston, Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. vii. p. 490. f. 59.
Triopa claviger, Johnston, Annals Nat. Hist., vol.i. p. 124. At the
same time with the Holidia Zetlandica, an individual of this spe-
cies occurred to us.
Chiton levigatus. Obtained in Strangford Lough by Mr. Hyndman
and myself. On oysters brought to Belfast market from Car-
lingford and Greencastle (co. Londonderry), W. T.; Bangor,
co. Down, Mr. R. Patterson.
«« Pleurobranchus plumula. Malbay (co. Clare), very rare,’’ W. H.
Harvey, Esq.
Turritella subtruncata.
Turbo subtruncata, Mont., p. 300. t. 10. f. 1. Of this species a single
specimen was obtained at Bundoran (co. Donegal), in 1840, by
Mrs. Hancock.
Rissoa calathisca. Among shell-sand which I obtained at Bantry
Bay in 1834, was an individual of this species.
Rissoa rupestris, Forbes, Ann. Nat. Hist., vol. v. p. 107. pl. 2. f. 13.
Dublin coast, T. W. Warren, Esq.; North-east coast, Mr.
Hyndman and W. T. Not rare.
Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland. 481
Lacuna rufa. Belfast and Strangford Loughs, Mr. Hyndman and
W.T. Rare.
Brocus striatus, Brown’s Illus., pl. 1. f. 18. Among shell-sand
brought from Bantry Bay in 1834, W. T.
Lima subauriculata. 'Two odd valves dredged in Strangford Lough,
in Aug. 1837, by Mr. Hyndman and W. T.
Modiola tulipa, Lam. A shell so named by Mr. Forbes was obtained
in Belfast Bay by Mr. Hyndman.
Gibbsii, Leach. Obtained by dredging, etc. in Clew Bay (co.
Mayo) during an excursion made to the west of Ireland in July
1840, by Mr. R. Ball, Mr. E. Forbes, Mr. Hyndman, and my-
self.
Crenella decussata.
Mytilus decussatus, Laskey, Wern. Mem., vol. i. p. 394. pl. 8. f. 17.
A few odd valves dredged in Strangford Lough in Aug. 1837,
by Mr. Hyndman and W. T. Captain Brown has applied the
name of Crenella elliptica to this species.
Mactra cinerea, Mont. Magilligan and Portmarnock, Mr. Hynd-
man.
elliptica, Brown. Portmarnock, W. T.
Donaz rubra, Mont. In shell-sand from Portmarnock. Bundoran,
Mrs. Hancock.
ZooPpuHyTa.
Hydra viridis, Linn. Obtained at Bandon (co. Cork) by Mr. Geo.
J. Allman.
Actinia viduata, Mull., Zool. Dan. Observed between tide-marks at
Lahinch (co. Clare) by Mr. Forbes and myself. We consider it
distinct in species from A. mesembryanthemum.
Anthea cereus, Johnst. Gertner, Phil. Trans., vol. lil. p. 78. t. 1.
f.1. In September 1835, I made a note of this species as
being the most common Actinia at Ballyhome Bay (co. Down),
where it was gregarious, forming in some places a continuous
fringe round large rock-pools and stones, exposed to view at
low water. In such quantity it is not now to be seen there,
having become gradually scarcer since the period mentioned.
In Dublin Bay and on the western coast this species likewise
prevails. It is commonly of a dull ash-colour throughout, but
wherever I have remarked it, some few individuals were to
be found of a green colour, with the tentacula partially or
wholly red. The A. cereus is doubtless one of the species
mentioned under another name by Mr. Templeton as found at
Ballyhome Bay (Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. ix. p. 303.), but in uncer-
tainty which of his should be referred to, I have thought it better
to notice the subject again.
Cellepora ramulosa, Linn. Johnst., Brit. Zoop., p. 274. pl. 32. f. 4,
5. Obtained at Youghal by Miss Ball; Portmarnock, 1835,
Weak.
Cliona celata, Grant. ‘In perforations of the shell of the oyster
(Ostrea edulis)” taken in Belfast Bay and elsewhere on the
north-east coast, W. T.
Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Vol. vii. get
482 Mr. Thompson’s Additions to the Fauna of Ireland.
ANNELIDA.
Nemertes gracilis, Johnst., Mag. Zool. and Bot., vol. i. p. 534. pl.
17. f. 1. Nov. 12, 1840. I received a specimen of this worm
taken at Cultra, Belfast Bay. It is larger than Dr. Johnston’s,
but agrees in every character with his description and figure.
lactiflorea, Johnst., Mag. Z. and B., vol. 1. 585. pl. 17.
f.2. With the last species, two examples of this were pro-
cured. The eyes are as described by Dr. Johnston, and conse-
quently the worm would seem to be distinct from Planaria ro-
sea, Mull. My specimens when extended are each about two
inches in length and of a yellowish flesh colour. ‘The characters
are all as given by Dr. Johnston.
Phylline Hippoglossi, Lam. Johnst., Annals Nat. Hist. vol. i. 431.
pl. 15. f. 1—8.
Hirudo Hippoglossi, Mull., Zool. Dan., vol. 11. p. 18. t. 54. For some
years past this species has commonly occurred to me on Halibut
(Hippoglossus vulgaris) brought to Belfast market, and captured
on the coasts of Down and Antrim.
Carinella trilineata, Lined Worm. Johnst., Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. vi.
Gordius annulatus, Mont., Linn. Trans., vol. vii. p. 74. This beau-
tiful worm has been dredged by Mr. Hyndman and myself on
different occasions in Strangford Lough and in the open sea at
Ballywalter on the Down coast: in every instance it was free.
Belfast Bay, Dr. Drummond.
Glossipora tuberculata, Johnson (J. R.). Neighbourhood of Cole-
raine, Mr. James Bryce, jun.
CRUSTACEA.
Pisa tetraodon, Leach, Mal. Brit., pl. 20. Mr. R. Ball has in his ca-
binet a specimen found at Roundstone by Mr. McCalla. This
species is given in Mr. Templeton’s catalogue of Irish Crustacea,
but I have reason to believe by mistake.
Ebalia Cranchii, Leach, Malac., tab. 25. f. 7—11. July 1840. A
single specimen dredged in Roundstone Bay, Connemara, by
Mr. R. Ball and Mr. Forbes. Several since obtained by Mr.
Ball, thrown on shore at Portmarnock by a storm.
Inachus leptochirus, Leach, Malac., tab. 22. B. A specimen dredged
in Clifden Bay, Connemara, about the same time with the last.
Belfast Bay, Mr. R. Patterson.
Athanas nitescens, Leach, Malac., t. 44.
Cancer nitescens, Mont. M.S. A specimen taken between tide-marks
at Lahinch, co. Clare, Mr. Forbes and W. T.
Aiga tridens, Leach. An Aiga agreeing in the few characters as-
signed to this species by Dr. Leach is in my collection. It was
taken alive on a cod-fish in Belfast market.
Mr. A. H. Hassall on some new Irish Zoophytes. 483
L.—Description of two new Genera of Irish Zoophytes*. By
Arruur Hitt Hassaur, Esq., Corresponding Member
of the Natural History Society of Dublin.
Order ZOOPHYTA ASCIDIOIDA.
Family ALCYONIDUL2.
Genus Cycioum.
Character.—Polypidom fleshy, encrusting, covered with numerous
imperforate papillz : polypi ascidian; ova in clusters.
Cycloum papillosum.—Polypi with eighteen tentacula disposed in
the form of a bell.
Tuis species is almost invariably found investing the frond
of Fucus serratus, over the surface of which it spreads in
patches of from one to two inches in extent, more frequently
of one, and seldom exceeding two inches. The crust is fleshy,
and rather thick: it is covered with numerous papille very
closely set together. The polypi do not issue from these pa-
pill, which are imperforate, but from larger eminences of
irregular form and size, in the centre of which a puckered
depression is seen. The polypi have eighteen tentacula, de-
scribing a cup or bell. The ova he in clusters, each cluster
containing six or seven ova arranged in a circle. The clusters
are irregularly scattered through the pelypidom, and each is
inclosed in a space somewhat larger than is sufficient to con-
tain it, the remainder of the space being occupied by a fluid
in which numerous small particles are seen which are kept in
constant action by the motion of the cilia on the ova. Each
ovum is of a circular form, but is depressed, one side more so
than the other: round its edge a fringe of cilia is apparent ;
these may be seen in motion long before the ova are ready for
becoming disengaged. I have discovered in this, as well as
in the succeeding and some other genera, a body of a very pe-
culiar nature, but concerning the uses of which I can at pre-
sent only hazard some conjectures. It is, in this species, and
in Alcyonidium gelatinosum and hirsutum, in which I have
also met with it, of an oblong form, and composed of a trans-
parent matter, in which numerous small dark brown granules,
circular in shape and uot unlike ova, are imbedded. [| at first
imagined that they were nothing more than particles of lime
lodged in a soft jelly-like substance, but this opinion was dis-
proved by the application of hydrochloric acid, which did not
cause effervescence. These bodies are far more numerous than
the ova, and are not more than one-tenth their size. The mest
probable conjecture which I have been able to form as to
* Communicated to the Dublin Nat. Hist. Society, Feb. 1841.
212
484 Mr. A. H. Hassall’s Description of
their nature is, that they are organs destined to contain the
ova until they have arrived at a certain degree of maturity, in
fact, ovaries, and if not ovaries, the ova themselves in a very
early stage of their formation.
I have been induced to raise this species to a generic rank,
principally from the arrangement of the oya in circles, which
is, I believe, peculiar to it. Some weeks ago, when at Belfast,
Mr. Thompson pointed out this species to my notice, say-
ing, at the same time, that he had forwarded it long since
to Dr. Johnston as new; its distinctive characters had how-
ever been made out by myself long previous to this interview
with Mr. Thompson, and reference is made to it in my Cata-
logue*.
This zoophyte, as well as the succeeding species, exhibits in a
very remarkable degree that “ close adhesion to life,” the usual
accompaniment of a low organization, which renders this class
of animals so patient of injuries which would be fatal to
beings of greater complexity of structure. I have on more
than one occasion seen the polypidoms of this and the follow-
ing species enveloped in a firm coating of ice; on immersion
of either of these in sea-water the coating has become dis-
solved, and the polypi have protruded their feelers, and have
appeared as active as though they had never been exposed to
such a very low degree of temperature as would have de-
stroyed the life of more highly organized animals. From this
it is apparent that their sensibility cannot be very great.
Dublin bay, on Fucus serratus ; not uncommon.
We now come to the description of the second genus.
Order ZOOPHYTA ASCIDIOIDA.
Family ALCYONIDULA.
Genus SarcocHITuM.
Character.—Polypidom encrusting, fleshy, covered with numerous
prominences of irregular form and unequal size, from which the po-
lypi issue ; ova circular, scattered singly throughout the polypidom ;
a dark brown body of a circular form filled with small round granules
is apparent in great numbers through the polypidom.—Polypi asci-
dian.
Sarcochitum polyoum.—Polypi with twenty tentacula.
This species is aiso usually found investing Fucus serratus,
the frond of which it sometimes covers to the extent of several
inches. The crust is thin and fleshy, and covered with nu-
merous large eminences of irregular form and unequal size,
which exhibit a puckered appearance in the centre, and from
* Published in the ‘Annals’ for Nov. 1840, p. 170.
two new Genera of Irish Zoophytes. 485
which the polypi issue; these have twenty tentacula. The
polypidom, when found on one side of the weed, is generally
also present on the reverse side ; and this is somewhat curious,
as the crust almost constantly terminates on each side of the
weed at some distance from its edge, so that it cannot reach
the one side from the other by a continuity of growth.
The oya in this species are exceedingly numerous, and vary
in colour from white to yellow ; they present much the same
form and appearance as those of the preceding genus. If a
quantity of the sea-weed, with the zoophyte upon it, be placed
in salt-water for a few hours, great numbers of the ova will
become liberated, and may plainly be seen with the unassisted
eye moving about in almost ceaseless action ; now gliding ra-
pidly along the surface of the water, now wheeling round upon
their axes; at one time elevating themselves in the fluid, again
as rapidly sinking in it:—these elevations and subsidences
seeming to depend upon the form of the ovum, which is seen
to change with these movements. The facility and rapidity
with which these little bodies seem to perform their evolutions
is very striking. They may often be seen to run along the
water in a straight line for several inches, at a pace which
would far outstrip the fleetest Newmarket racer—the relative
sizes of the two creatures being taken into consideration ;—and
it is not a little curious to observe, that no matter how many
ova be moving about in the same space, still they never come
in contact, appearing to avoid each other as carefully as
though they were possessed of eyes.
The thought then occurred to me, that the minute, frail,
and delicate ova of these species must have made their way
unscathed and uninjured through from twenty to thirty miles
of the troubled and stormy ocean, and have fixed themselves
to our rocks—the vibratile cilia on their surfaces being mainly
instrumental in effecting their transportation.
The polypidoms of this and the preceding species are often
so mixed up in their distribution upon the same piece of sea-
weed, that it requires a practised eye to distinguish them. I
have been induced to consider this species as distinct from
the genus Alcyonidium, to which it bears a near relation—for
the following reasons: 1st. The number of the tentacula, a
character which I have found to be constant, it being twenty
in this and but sixteen in Alcyonidium; 2nd. This species
never rises from the surface of attachment in the form of an
independent polypidom; it is invariably encrusting, whereas
all the species of the genus Alcyonidium do form elevated
polypidoms; and 3rd. There is a difference in the form of the
body or organ to which I have referred in the description of
486 Mr. T. C. Eyton’s Notes on Birds.
the genus Cyclowm ;—it being circular in this, while it is ob-
long in the genus Alcyonidium.
I have frequently noticed a species of zoophyte lining the
interior of old shells of Buccinum undatum, and covering the
under surface of stones, which I consider to be identical with
this. If a portion of the polypidom of this species, in a living
condition, be suddenly plunged into spirits, an instantaneous
protrusion of the polypi takes place, having their feelers ar-
ranged, as in life, in the form of a graceful bell. In this state
they may be kept, for a time, for the purposes of future ex-
amination. The cause of this protrusion is readily explained.
The polypes being already contracted within their cells,—on
the application of the irritating spirit are compelled to start
outwards ;—the only motion of which they are capable when
folded up within these cells*.
I have, in conclusion, to acknowledge the assistance I re-
ceived from the classical attainments of my talented and va-
lued friend, G. J. Allman, Esq. of Bandon, in the naming of
the genera.
LI.— Notes on Birds. By T. C. Eyron, Esq., F.L.S.
INO. TH:
Merops Melanura, Vig. and Horsf.
ToncuE long, poited, but soft at the extremity and without bristles,
posteriorly armed with two strong spines on each side, between which
there are a few smaller ones.
CEsophagus small, of nearly uniform diameter; proventriculus
large, nearly globular, and slightly contracted at its entrance into
the stomach, which is somewhat oval and slightly muscular, with the
epithelium hardened.
The intestinal canal was much damaged, but appeared to be of
rather large diameter. I could not perceive any ceca: liver large,
bilobed, right lobe nearly twice the size of the left.
Sternum rather elongated, with a deep keel considerably produced
anteriorly, and much rounded on its inferior edge. The posterior
margin of the sternum indented on each side with two very deep
fissures, the lateral ones deepest, broader posteriorly than anteriorly ;
the manubrial process not distinct and prominent, but merged into
the keel, which is continued forwards between the coracoids.
Os furcatum with the rami much flattened laterally, strong and
slightly arched, without any process at the point where it approaches
the sternum ; coracoids of moderate length and strength, with a very ~
broad articulation to the sternum.
Pelvis very broad ; obturator foramen linear, nearly obliterated ;
* Drawings of these two genera have been forwarded by myself to Dr.
Johnston, and will, I suppose, appear in his Supplement.
Sir P. G. Egerton’s Catalogue of Fossil Fish. 487
ischiadic foramen oval, of moderate size. Cotyloid cavities placed
near the centre of the pelvis ; os pubis not continued far downwards,
with the extremity inclined upwards and inwards.
Scapulars broad, widest near their extremities, which are pointed.
The skeleton was too much injured to enable me to make out the
numbering of the vertebre with certainty.
Remar«s.—In the anatomy of the soft parts, as far as I
could make them out from a much damaged specimen, and
in the skeleton, a great preponderance is shown in favour of
the genus Merops being classed with the Kingfishers, which
indeed might be expected from the external structure ; and in
those points in which it differs it appears to approach the
Humming Birds, a group which I think must also be classed
among the fissirostral or volitorial division of birds.
The sternum, in having two posterior fissures on each side,
agrees with the Kingfishers, but is altogether longer and has
a deeper keel in proportion to its length, and the inferior
edge of it is more rounded than in that family, in which par-
ticulars it appears to approach the Humming Birds.
The coracoids and humerus are proportionally shorter, al-
though of nearly the same form as among the Alcedinide:
these portions of the skeleton are found remarkably short
among the Humming Birds.
In the structure of the pelvinal bones, the os furcatum, and
ribs, Merops agrees precisely with the typical Kingfishers.
LII.—A Catalogue of Fossil Fish in the Collections of the KARL
oF ENNISKILLEN, F.G.S., &c. and Sir Puitie Grey
Egerton, Bart., F.R.S., &c.*
GeNvs and Spectres. Formation. Locality.
Acanthoderma spinosum ... Black schist...... Engi.
Acanthopleurus serratus ... ID or Bean deaceacober Ib.
Acanus arcuatus ............ IDX); Sogszoonnewaude Ib.
—— oblongus ............06 iD) OF tscienistdanaqus Ib.
Acipenser Toliapicus...... London clay ... Sheppy.
Acrodus Anningie ......... LDH Sooasaatanboooe Lyme Regis.
STAN Aely eoteeele sie estes Grés bigarré ... Deux Ponts.
— Gaillardoti ............ Muschelkalk ... Bayreuth.
— gibberulus ............ Tuas tae shiasenestons Lyme Regis.
—— latus......cccsereeeevee IDYis incep Sqonepeedas alos
* This Catalogue has been printed for private distribution by Sir Philip
Grey Egerton, to whose kindness we are indebted for permission to insert it.
488
a) a eee eee
Fossil Fish in the Collections of
Genus and SPECIES.
Acrodus Jeiodus
TMMINITNUS, vec-aeceaee cece
MODIS) sesentseeeieeleistelacls
wee eee aeenee
Acrolepis aSper .....+.eseeess
Sedgwickii .....-......
/AStobates irregularis ......
Amblypterus eupterygius ...
lateralis
——— atu ........cccccseecsees
Amblyurus macrostomus ...
Anenchelum dorsale .........
Glarisianum’...........°
—— heteropleurum.........
isopleurum ..........+5
latum
Aspidorhynchus acutirostris
Anglicus ..........2.0+
Comptoni
mandibularis
Asteracanthus ornatissimus
semisulcatus........0006
Asteroptychius ornatus......
Atherina macrocephala......
Aulolepis typuS ........e0
Belonostomus acutus
leptosteus .......se00e
1M Brink} ry aassnnaagod soos
tenellus
eee ee eee
Beryx microcephalus
— ornatus
TACIANS ......eeeeeeseneee
seer eee eeneeeee
Blochius longirostris
Carangopsis dorsalis.........
latior
Carcharias grosseserratus...
—— macrodon
—— megalodon ............
megalotis ........0.0000
—— minor
POLYZYIUS ............006
PLOCUCHUS) eS eeae sense
—— subserratus .........06+
Sere eee eee eeees
Formation.
Great Oolite
Muschelkalk ? ...
Witasie cone ceeticnmes
Kupfer-schiefer
Mag. Limestone
London clay
Coal formation...
Kimmeridge clay
Great Oolite
Carb. Limestone
eee eeeeenee
LETS Seenqnaeng0d000
Great Oolite
Oolite’ ..c..2..eee-
DAaserscsaeeseetes
Locality.
Stonesfield.
Axmouth.
Lyme Regis.
Mansfeld.
Ferry Hill.
Sheppy.
Lebach.
Tb.
Ib.
Ib.
Street.
Engi.
Ib.
Ib.
Ib.
Ib.
Solenhofen.
Whitby.
Brazil.
Solenhofen.
Shotover.
Stonesfield.
Armagh.
Monte Bolea.
Kent.
Whitby.
Stonesfield.
Solenhofen.
Lyme.
Kent.
Tb.
Ib.
Monte Boleca.
Tb.
Ib.
Maryland.
Ib.
Malta.
Maryland.
Ib.
Ib.
Malta.
Sheppy.
the Karl of Enniskillen and Sir P. G. Egerton.
Genus and SPECIES.
Caturus furcatus .........065
MACTOGUS) son scessscee es
ANACTULUN fe 65 sucess sees
——— MAXIMUS .......esceeeee
——— MICTOCHIFUS .......0000-
PachyUrus! © s.<-cs-<05
—— pleiodus ...............
Ceratodus altus ............
—— gibbus ...........0..ee
—— planus ...........0.ee ee
Cheiracanthus microlepidotus
THINOD Steve soscessacicss
Cheirolepis Cummingiz ...
Traillii .......2.. ascacees
Chimera Agassizii_ ...... aes
DreVirOStrisS ...+eeeeeee-
G@aleteereccs cocssssenae
—— Egertoni .....+sseseees
Mantellit ......cccccce+e
dO) WE secesecsccascessen
Chomatodus cinctus ........-
———— | ESI Gc5ec Neesaeecas
—— {runcatus ....... cess ws
Chondrosteus acipenserides
Cladocyclus Gardneri ......
Lewesiensis .......... +02 LDYD5, Gaodon0d0sc00d Tb.
—— MINOY ... ss eeeeeeee eens Purbeck stone... Purbeck.
notopterus .........66- Oolite, Snssseecse Solenhofen.
—— palliatus ............... Kimmeridge clay Boulogne.
punctulatus .........64 CIPS “aaconnecddos Kent.
—— semiserratus ......... IVINS Gonanastoaadon: Whitby.
serratulus ........+++ ID Sb egcemabocasicboo Barrow.
unguiculatus ......... Great Oolite . Stonesfield.
the Earl of Enniskillen and Sir P. G. Egerton. 493
Genus and SPECIEs. Formation. Locality.
Lepracanthus Colei ......... Coal shale ...... N. Wales.
Leptacanthus semistriatus Great Oolite ... Stonesfield.
SCIEARUSTE cesceeegeuste es DOo. ca-cesce sce ges Tb.
—— tenuispinus ...........+ | BENS Baeececconcus Lyme.
Leptolepis Bronnii ......... UNAS eaecets eth acer Lyme.
CHUUAHSD ceceseccseccs es DOL sss ceetesoeetes Ib.
CONTEACUUS)| .ocsesssce ee Oolite:.. cites. Solenhofen.
(HS: - Secaacsesdcasec WAS ess cectcecs es lb.
—— filipennis ............. Ss IVES oebeastannococe Street.
ICTIORTI ccc tec cece sce se A Ooliter..c2ittcees Solenhofen.
WAS eceeccssacstcsseeees DGanst-cactscccesed Eichstadt.
paucispondylus ,..... Green sand ...... Kelheim.
—— polyspondylus ,,....... OMNES coccossoocee Solenhofen.
TESTS RY Saendacasdacosnce Green sand ,...,. Kelheim.
sprattiformis ......... Opliters--ceocs- +s Solenhofen,
Sa VOTE Ses ssiepais tes nee Green sand ...... Kelheim.
Leuciscus gracilis .,.......... Tertiary beds ... Wurtemburg.
VAGUSCUIUS) .icessesrccs On rsteecctcesesste (ningen.
HATER) eooocansondasoe Papier-kohl ...... Rhine.
—— (€ningensis ............ Tertiary beds .., (Eningen.
PAPYTACEUS .......eee0 Papier-kohl...... Rhine.
Lichia prisca .........ssseeeees EOcene........0000 Monte Bolea.
Macropoma Egertoni ...... Galiensseess=esese> Speeton.
Manteliic...cccesseserss Chalks isscshss sees Sussex.
Macrosemius brevirostris ... Great Oolite ... Stonesfield.
Mallotus villosus ........+. he Recent beds ....., Greenland.
Megalichthys Hibberti...... Coal shale ...... Burdie House.
Megalops priscus ......+. ete London clay...... Sheppy.
Microdon hexagonus ...... Oolites. 22522823 Solenhofen.
TACUEGUSE Nee sec cce sees cee Purbeck stone... Purbeck.
Mnugil princeps .......+..+++++ Tertiary beds ... Aix.
Myliobates angustus......... London clay..... . Sheppy.
PYLAUUS sp ennes sees ee=s ‘ IMG r acdocsooaaseped Ib.
——marginalis ............ ID aondedscoanecen Ib.
—— MITIANS 20... ...cceecceece DOs .ccevcvesvecses Tb.
Myliobates Stokesii .........
—— StudeM ........cccscecece Molasse ......... Soleure.
— subarcuatus ....,....... London clay...... Sheppy.
Toliapicus.............4+ IDG» ecssconsconcoce Ib.
aa Seer COLOOUE: Dyeeeees (Orie crecnoonnnnen Norfolk.
Myriacanthus paradoxus ... IWR ecedeoecoucanos Lyme.
—— T€tIOFSUS ........e000e0e DOs Seeccweecets oe Tb.
Mpyripristis homopterygius OCCIC: ose sce - Monte Bolca.
leptacanthus......... we DOs icesdcavassdes . Ib.
494 Fossil Fish in the Collections of
Genus and SPECIES. Formation. Locality.
Nemacanthus brevispinus... Great Oolite... Stonesfield.
HlifeTsspeceatescoscaeenee Muschelkalk ? ... Aust.
Nemopteryx crassus ........- Black schist...... Engi.
CLONGAatUS ......c.cereeoe [DOs gacshannceskber Ib.
: [do.
Notagogus Pentlandi......... Jura Limestone Torre d’Orlan-
Nothosemus octostychius... WAS i cceecdavene ces Lyme.
Notidanus microdon......... Chalkayteesescetsc Kent.
primigenius ............ Molasse Wancsssent Soleure.
Odontaspis rhaphiodon...... Chalk. --—
ACTINOLOGY, British, contributions
to, 81.
Agaricus epixylon, on the structure and
colouring of, 403.
Alcyonidium, new species of, 370.
Alexander, W. T., on the Irish localities
for Dianthus plumarius, 238.
Alge, new species of, 57; development
of, 469.
Amadina, new species of, 553.
Amphibia, branchial classification of, 353.
Amphioxus lanceolatus, anatomy of, 346.
Anemone ranunculoides, occurrence of,
237.
Animalcules in the anthers of Chare, 44.
Animals, occurrence of, in sulphureous
waters, 105.
Aplothorax Burchellii, description of, 145.
Apocopis, new genus, description of, 220.
Apodytes, new genus, description of, 215.
Aquilegia vulgaris, on the spur-shaped
nectaries of, 1.
Arachnida, descriptions of new, 471.
Arvicola, new British species of, 274.
Atmosphere, alteration produced in the,
during the development of heat in the
spadix of Colocasia, 161.
Aulopyge, a new genus of fish, 522.
Babington, Ch. C., on Saxifraga umbrosa,
47 ; on a new genus of Linez, 217.
Barkhausia taraxacifolia, notes on, 437.
Batratherum, characters of, 220.
Bats, four new species of, 19; observa-
tions on British, 262.
Bauer, F., notice of the late, 77, 439.
Bellamy, J. C., Natural History of South
Devon, reviewed, 209.
Bentham, G., on two new genera of plants
allied to Olacinez, 214.
Berkeley, Rev. M. J., on an edible Fun-
gus, 436; on Gloionema paradoxum,
449; descriptions of exotic Fungi, 451;
on the fruit-bearing organs of the Tri-
chogastre and Phalloide, 464.
Bernhardi, M., on the formation of seed,
167.
Bird, fossil, 67.
Bird-architecture, curious instance of, 505.
Birds, notes on, 26, 48, 177, 486; of
Kent, 523; of Tangiers, 557; new, from
Australia, 571; descriptions of new
species of, 152.
Bizeura lobata, anatomy of, 177.
5)
P
Blood-corpuscles, Mr. Gulliver on, 556,
577.
Blyth, E., on the species of the genus
Ovis, 195, 248.
Boletus viscidus, occurrence of, in Britain,
18.
Borrer, W., on Emberiza hortulana, 524.
Botanical Society of Edinburgh, proceed-
ings of, 157, 212.
Botanical travellers, information respect-
ing, 226, 348, 520.
Botany, physiological, report on the pro-
gress of, 166, 399, 460.
Botany, Dr. Willshire’s principles of, re-
viewed, 322.
Botrytis Bassiana, on the origin and de-
velopment of, 405.
Bowerbank, J. 8., on the horny sponges
of commerce, 72; on a keratose sponge
from Australia, 129; on the siliceous
bodies of the chalk, greensand and
oolites, 223.
Braun, A., on the anthers of plants, 176 ;
on the germination of the spores of
Marsilea quadrifolia, 466; on the
growth of the Ophioglossz, 467.
Brazil, plants of, 531.
Broderip, W. J., description of shells col-
lected by H. Cuming, 226, 335, 546.
Brown, J., on fossil shells found in a
fluvio-marine deposit in Essex, 427.
Brown, S., on the identity of silicon and
carbon, 345.
Brush Turkey, 539. }
Buckland, Rev. Prof., on the evidences of
glaciers in Scotland and the north of
England, 326.
Bulinus, descriptions of new species of,
220, 335.
Bunbury, —, on the plants of Brazil, 531.
Burn, A., on the habits of blister-flies, 147.
Busk, G., on the anatomy of Tricocepha-
lus dispar, 212.
Butterflies, on the migrations of, in Bri-
tish Guiana, 151.
Cactez, descriptions of new, 325.
Ceciliz, on the existence of branchiz in
the young, 353.
Canary-bird, talking, 523.
Carabide, description of a new genus of,
145.
Cardium, new species of, collected by Mr
Cuming, 506.
9)
=
580
Carlisle, Sir A., notice of the late, 441.
Chetura ruficollis, notice respecting, 351.
Chalk, on fossil remains from the, 67;
siliceous bodies of the, 223.
Chalk rocks, on the composition of, by
organic bodies, 296, 374.
Char, on animalcules in the anthers of,
44,
Chlorion, on the nomenclature of the ge-
nus, 435.
Clark, B., on the Cstri and Cuterebre of
various animals, 438.
Clarke, C., on the Musician-bird of Cuba,
576.
Clarke, H., on the preservation of speci-
mens, 436.
Cliococca, characters of, 217.
Coleoptera, descriptions of new, 147.
Colocasia odora, development of heat in
the spadix of, 161.
Columbine, on the spur-shaped nectaries
of the, 1.
Conferve, formation of, on Water Sala-
manders, 405.
Coptocercus, characters of the new genus,
62.
Coral animals, contributions to the physio-
logical knowledge of the, 296.
Corda, M., on Fungi, 460; on the Euas-
tree and Cosmariexz, 470 ; Icones
Fungorum, noticed, 434.
Crab, description of a new genus of, 324.
Cracticus, new species of, 553.
Crepis biennis, notes on, 437.
Crivelli, B., on the development of Bo-
trytis Bassiana, 405.
Crocodilide, blood-corpuscles of, 556.
Cryptogamia, on the organs of fructifi-
cation in, 399.
Cuming, Mr. Hugh, numerous objects of
natural history collected by, 226, 335,
506, 543, 560, 562.
Cuscuta, on the mode of attachment of,
218.
Cyanea, notice of the genus, 235.
Cycadez, remarks on the recent and fos-
sil, 110.
Cycloum, a new genus of Zoophytes, 483.
Cyperacez, descriptive catalogue of In-
dian, 219.
Cyttaria, description of the new genus,
436.
Davis, Dr. J. F., zoological observations
made in the neighbourhood of Tenby,
234.
Decaisne, M., on the reproductive organs
of the Misseltoe, 169, 185 ; of Thesium,
173.
De Selys Longchamps, Baron, Monogra-
phie des Libellulidées d’Europe, re-
viewed, 141.
De Vyiese, W. H., on some new Cactez,
BQ
INDEX.
Dianthus plumarius, on the Irish locali-
ties for, 238.
Dickie, G., on the occurrence of amylum
in plants, 467.
Diphya, occurrence of, on the coast of
Treland, 164.
Dipodomys Phillipsii, a new glirine ani-
mal, 522.
Diurnea Novembris, occurrence of, 447.
Don, Prof., on the pitcher of Nepenthes,
218; on plants collected in Lycia and
Caria, 454.
Dynastes, new species of, 147.
Echinocactus, new species of, 325.
Echinochorium, description of the genus,
371.
Edmondston, T., list of plants observed in
the Shetland Islands, 287.
Edseton, R.S., on Diurnea Novembris,
447.
Education, on natural history as a branch
of, 498.
Eels, effects of frost on, 75, 236.
Egerton, Sir Ph. Grey, catalogue of fossil
fish, 487.
Ehrenberg, Prof., on the composition of
chalk rocks of Infusoria, 296, 374.
Enniskillen, Earl of, collection of fossil
fish, 487.
Entomologica, Arcana, reviewed, 323.
Entomological Society, proceedings of,
143, 434, 535; anniversary meeting,
435.
Epeira, new species of, 474.
Ephemera vulgata, on the structure of the
mouth of the preparatory states of, 55.
Equisetacezx of the Shetland Islands, 295.
Eripus, new species of, 476.
Esenbeck, Nees von, descriptive catalogue
of the Graminez and Cyperacez in the
Indian herbarium of Dr. Royle, 219.
Evaniide, on the family of, 535.
Excerpta botanica, 44, 185.
Eyton, T. C., notes on birds, 48, 177,
486.
Falco Groenlandicus, 478.
Fauna of Ireland, 477.
Fellows, C., plants collected by, in Lycia,
454.
Fermentation, remarks on, 404.
Ferns, on the geographical distribution of
British, 213; hybridity of, 467.
Feronia, new species of, 120.
Fish, fossil, Sir P. G. Egerton’s catalogue
of, 487.
Fishes, Madeiran, description of new
species of, 92.
Flints, on the animal origin of, 223.
Flora of central Norfolk, 201.
Flustra, new species of, 369.
Foraminifera of the white chalk of the
Paris basin, 390.
Forbes, E., contributions to British Acti-
INDEX.
nology, 81; on the appendages of the
anthers in the genus Viola, 157; ona
new genus of Ascidian Mollusks, 345.
Fraser, Mr., on some new species of birds,
152,
Fresnaye, M. de la, on the Upupide, 551
Fruit-trees, on the ennobling of, 177.
Fungi, origin of, 192; observations on,
460; of the neighbourhood of Bristol,
17; on a new genus of edible, 436;
descriptions of exotic, 451.
Fungorum icones, by Corda, 434.
Gasterosteus, on the Irish species of, 95.
Geological science, Dr. Smith on the re-
lation between the Scriptures and, re-
view of, 429.
Geological Society, proceedings of, 67,
223, 326, 512.
Geology, Certainties of, by Gibson, re-
viewed, 429.
Geryon, description of the genus, 324.
Gibson, W. S., The Certainties of Geology,
reviewed, 429.
Giraffe, birth in London of a, 351.
Giraud, M., on the structure and function
of pollen, 176.
Glaciers, traces of the former existence of,
in Scotland and the north cf England,
326, 512.
Gloionema paradoxum, observations on,
449.
Goodsir, J., on the anatomy of Amphioxus
lanceolatus, 346; on a new genus of
Pycnoganide, 344; on a new genus of
Ascidian Mollusks, 345.
Gould, Mr., on new species of Kangaroo,
503, 554; on bird-architecture, 505;
on the Brush Turkey (Talegalla), and
on Leipoa, a new genus, 539, 552; on
new Australian birds, 541; on new
birds from Australia, 571; on a new
Dasyurus, 575.
Graminez in the Indian herbarium of
Dr. Royle, catalogue of the, 219.
Grammatophora, new species of, 87.
Gray, J. E., on new species and genera
of reptiles from Australia, 86; on a
new glirine animal from Mexico,
521.
Gray’s, G. R., Genera of Birds, commen-
tary on, 26.
Greensand, on the siliceous bodies of the,
223.
Greville, Dr., on the botanical characters
of the British Oaks, 157.
Griesbach, Rev. A. W., on the Pea Beetle,
535.
Griffith, W., on the ovaria of orchideous
plants, 218; on the mode of attach-
ment of Cuscuta and Orobanche, 218.
Grundlach, Dr., on four bats taken in
Cuba, 19.
581
Gulliver, G., on the blood-corpuscles of
Crocodilidz, 556; of Paradoxurus, 577.
Halichzrus Gryphus, notice respecting, 79.
Hanover, M., on a contagious conferva-
formation on the Water Salamanders,
405.
Hassall, A. H., catalogue of Irish Zoo-
phytes, with descriptions of new spe-
cies, 276, 363, 483.
Hay, G. W. H. D., on the birds of Tan-
giers, 557.
Heckel, F., on Aulopyge, a new species
of fish) 523.
Heleioporus, description of the new ge-
nus, 91.
Helix, new species of, 230, 337, 429, 543,
560.
Herbaria, European, notices of, 132, 179.
Hincks, Rev. W., on the occurrence of
Anemone ranunculoides, 237.
Hippocrene, description of a British, 82.
Hogg, J., on the existence of branchiz in
the young Ceciliz, and on the bran-
chial classification of the Amphibiz,
353.
Hoopoe, on the characters of the, 551.
Hope, Rev. F. W., on the Stenochoride
of N. Holland, 58; on some new Coleo-
ptera, 147.
Hymenomycete, structure of the hyme-
nium in, 402.
Hymenoptera, descriptions of new, 152.
Hyndman, G. C., on the occurrence of
Diphya on the coast of Ireland, 164.
Hypericum quadrangulum, notice respect-
ing, 213.
Tecones Fungorum, noticed, 434.
Iguanodon, Mr. Mantell on the, 529.
Infusoria, remarks on, 245; in sulphu-
reous waters, 109 ; in the cells of plants,
470.
Insects, carabideous, descriptions of, 120;
hymenopterous, descriptions of new,
152; instructions in collecting, 146;
Westwood’s Introduction to the modern
classification of, reviewed, 53.
Ireland, additions to the fauna of, 477;
Zoophytes of, 276, 363, 483.
Jardine, Sir W., on the structure and ha-
bits of Lepidosiren annectens, 21.
Jennings, F. M., on eels killed by frost,
236.
Jenyns, Rey. L., on the smaller British
Mammalia and on a new species of
Arvicola, 261.
Johnson, H., on Chetura ruficollis, 351.
Jungermannia, on the development of the
spores of, 400.
Jussieu, A. de, on the embryos of Mono-
cotyledons, 174.
Kangaroo, new species of, 505, 554.
Kapnea, description of the new genus, 81.
582
Kerguelen’s Land, natural history of, 530.
Klotzsch, M.,on the Hymenomycetz, 402.
Korber, G., on the green cells of the
thallus of Lichens, 467.
Kratzmann, E., on the seeds of plants,
174.
Kroyer, H., Naturhistorisk Tidskrift, no-
ticed, 324.
Langenella repens, description of, 364.
Lankester, Dr. E., on plants and animals
found in sulphureous waters, 105.
Leighton, W. A., notices in botany, 44,
185.
Lepidosiren, Sir W. Jardine on the, 21;
notices on, 358.
Lepidosiren annectens, Prof. Owen on
the microscopic structure of the teeth
of the, 211.
Lepralia, new species of British, 367.
Leptatherum, characters of, 219.
Leretia, on the new genus, 216.
Léveillé on the development of the Ure-
dines, 465.
Lewis, E., on distinctive characters in
zoology, 545.
Libellulidées d’ Europe, reviewed, 141.
Lichens, on the green cells of the thallus
of, 467.
Liébig, Prof., on fermentation, 404.
Linez, description of a new genus of,
ilir(e
Linnea for 1840, contents of, 433.
Linnean Society, proceedings of, 214,
436, 531; anniversary of the, 439.
Linyphia, new species of, 473.
Lobostoma, a new genus of Bats, 20.
Loranthacez, on the flowers of the, 171.
Lowe, Rev. R. T., on new species of Ma-
deiran fishes, 92.
Luidia, suicidal powers of, 238.
Lush, Dr., on the Madi, or Chili oil-seed,
446.
Lycia, plants of, 454.
Lycoperdon, new species of, 454.
Lycopodiacee of the Shetland Islands,
295.
Lyell, Mr., on former glaciers in Scot-
land, 512.
Lytta, habits of, 147.
M‘Cormick, R., on the natural history of
Kerguelen’s Land, 530.
Macropus, new species of, 505, 554.
Madia sativa, notice on, 446.
Mammalia, British, notes on the smaller,
261.
Mammillaria, new species of, 325.
Mantell, G. A., on Saurian fossils, 529.
Marsilea quadrifolia, on the germination
of the spores of, 466.
Melanocenchris, characters of, 221.
Memorie della Reale Accademia di Torino,
210.
INDEX.
Menura Lyra, on the structure and affi-
nities of, 48.
Meropachys, new species of, 64.
Merops melanura, anatomy of, 486.
Meteorological observations, 79, 159, 239,
351, 447, 527.
Meyen, Prof. F. J., on impregnation in
plants, 168; on the formation of the
seeds of Viscum album, and on Poly-
embryony, 171; on red and green
snow, 245; report on physiological
botany, 166, 399, 460.
Microscopical Society, proceedings of, 72,
211.
Miers, J., on a new genus of plants from
Brazil, 222.
Misseltoe, on the reproductive organs of
the, 169, 171, 185.
Mohl, H., on the formation of stomata,
206.
Mohl, M., on the development of the
spores of the Jungermannia, 400.
Mollusks, on a new genus of, 345.
Moloch, description of the new genus, 88.
Monocotyledons, on the embryos of the,
174.
Morren, Prof. Ch., on spur-shaped nec-
taries, and in particular those of Aqui-
legia vulgaris, 1; on Infusoria in plants,
470; on the structure and colouring of
Agaricus epixylon, 403.
Morris, J., on the recent and fossil Cy-
cadex, 110.
Motacilla alba, occurrence of, in Britain,
350.
Miiller, Prof. J., on Valenciennes’ memoir
on the anatomy of the Nautilus, 243.
Mummery, S., on the birds of Kent, 159,
523.
Murex, new species of, 562.
Musician-bird, 576.
Myrapetra, description of the new genus,
320.
Myriapoda, on the development of the,
150.
Natural History, on the preservation of
specimens of, 436.
Naturhistorisk Tidskrift, contents of the,
, 324,
Nautilus, on the anatomy of the, 241.
Nectaries of plants, considerations on, 1.
Nepenthes distillatoria, on the pitcher of,
218.
Nidification of the Talegalla and Leipoa,
553.
Norfolk, flora of, 201.
Oaks, British, characters of, 157.
Céstri, new species of, 439.
Ogilby, W., on Dipus Mitchellii, 575.
Olacinez, on two new genera of, 214.
Olax, new species of, 217.
Oolites, on the siliceous bodies of the, 223.
INDEX.
Ophioglossez, on the growth of the, 467.
Orbigny, Alcide d’, on the Foraminifers
of the white chalk of the Paris basin,
390.
Orchideous plants, on the ovaria of, 218.
Orobanche, on the mode of attachinent of,
218.
Orthoraphium, characters of, 221.
Oscillatoriz, observations on, 468.
Ovis, on the species of the genus, 195,
248.
Owen, Prof, on the remains of a bird,
tortoise, and Lacertian saurian from the
chalk, 67; on the microscopical struc-
ture of certain fossil teeth, 211; onthe
structure of the teeth of Lepidosiren
annectens, 211; on Nautilus, 241; on
Lepidosiren, 358.
Patterson, Mr. R., on the value of natural
history as a branch of education, 498.
Paussidz, new species of, 532.
Pea-beetie, 535.
Pedicellina, description of the genus, 365.
Pelonaia, a new genus of Ascidian Mol-
lusks, 345.
Pentateuch, opinions of Bp. Chandler,
Bp. Berkeley, Dr. Hey, and Dr. Paley,
upon the natural philosophy of, 431.
Phalloide, on the fruit-bearing organs of
the, 465.
PhilippineIslands, Mr.Cuming’s researches
in, 226, 548, 560.
Phlomis, new species of, 458.
Pholcus, new species of, 477.
Phosphorescence of marine animals, notice
on the, 350.
Pinus, new species of, 459.
Plagiolytrum, characters of, 221.
Planorbis, new species of, 429.
Plants, contributions to the morphology
of, 1; absorption of liquid solutions by
the sap-vessels of, 74; found in sul-
phureous waters, notice of, 105; on
impregnation in, 168; on a new genus
of, from Brazil, 222; list of, observed
in the Shetland Islands, 287 ; of Lycia
and Caria, 454; of Brazil, 531; new
species of, 457; on Infusoria in, 470.
Plumularia, new species of, 285.
Pogopetalum, characters of the new genus,
216.
Poison-plant of the Indians, 407.
Pollen, on the structure and function of,
176.
Polyembryony in plants, 171.
Polypes, descriptions of new genera and
species of, 81, 483; Mr. Hassall on,
277, 363.
Polyporus, new species of, 453.
Pycnoganidz, on a new genus and some
new species of, 345.
Rafinesque-Schmaltz, notice of, 526.
Reptiles, descriptions of some new genera
583
and species of, from Western Australia,
86.
Riccia glauca, on the organs of fructifica-
tion of, 166.
Riley, J., on the hybridity of Ferns, 467.
Rocks, furrowed or polished, 827, 515,
524.
Ronia, a new genus of reptiles, 87.
Royal Society of Edinburgh, proceedings
of, 345.
Salamanders, formation of Conferve on,
405.
Salticus, new species of, 476.
Sarcochitum, a new genus of Zoophytes,
484.
Saxifraga umbrosa, notes on, 47.
Schleiden, Prof., on the flowers of the
Loranthacee, 171.
Schomburgk, R., on the arrow-poison of
the Indians, and the plant from which
it is extracted, 407; on the migrations
of certain butterflies in British Guiana,
Los
Scotland, ancient glaciers of, 331, 512.
Seed, on the formation of, 167, 174, 399.
Sertularia, new species of, 284.
Sheep, Mr. Blyth on the species of, 195,
248.
Shells, descriptions of new genera and
species of, 226, 355, 506, 546, 560.
Shells, fossil, list of the, found in Essex,
427,
Shetland Islands, list of the plants of the,
287.
Shuckard, W. E., on the neuters of ants,
525.
Silicon, on the production of, from para-
cyanogen, 345.
Slate-rock, bored by Echinus
523.
Smith, J., on a new genus of Euphor-
biacez, 168.
Smith, Rev. Dr. J. P., on the Relation be-
tween Geology and the Scriptures, re-
view of, 429.
Snow, observations on red and green, 245.
Sorex, on British species of, 263.
Sowerby, G. B., on new species of the
family Helicide, 230, 337, 543, 560;
of Cardium, 506; on a new species of
Murex, 562.
Spiders, descriptions of new, 473.
Sponges, keratose, remarks on the, 72;
on the structure of a, 129.
Staphylinide, observations on the Lin-
nzan species of, 149.
Stenochoridz of New Holland, new species
of, 58.
Stephens, H. O., on the Fungi of the
neighbourhood of Bristol, 17; cn the
origin of some of the lower forms of
vegetation, 190.
Stickleback, on the Ivish species of, 95.
lividus,
584
Stiebel, Dr., on the Oscillatoriz, 468.
Stomata, on the formation of, 206.
Strickland, H. E., on Mr. G. R. Gray’s
Genera of Birds, 26.
Strychnos toxifera, description of, 407.
Talegalla Lathami, Mr. Owen on, 540.
Teeth, fossil, on the microscopical struc-
ture of, 211.
Tetragnatha, new species of, 475.
Thaumantias, new species of, $4.
Thesium, on the structure and fecunda-
tion of the ovulum of, 173.
Thienemann, M., on the development of
Alge, 469.
Thompson, W., on the Irish species of
Stickleback, 95; on the Fauna of Ire-
land, 477.
Thuret, G., on the anther of Charz, and
the animalcules contained in it, 44.
Tidskrift, Naturhistorisk, noticed, 324.
Tijdschrift voor Natuurlijke Geschiedenis,
noticed, 325.
Tilgate forest, fossil saurians of, 529.
Tortoise, description of a fossil, 68.
Trachelorachys, characters of the genus,
63.
Trametes stuppeus, description of, 453.
- Travellers, information respecting, 226,
348, 520.
Trichogastr, on the fruit-bearing organs
of the, 465.
Tricocephalus dispar, on the anatomy of,
Bi:
Triuris, description of the new genus, 222.
Tubulipora, new species of, 366.
Turin, Memoirs of the Academy of, 210.
Turkey, the Brush, 539, 545, 552.
Turpin, M., on mouldiness of butter, 405.
Unger, M., on the organs of fructification
of Riccia glauca, 166, 399.
Uperoleia, description of the new genus, 90.
Upupide, M. de la Fresnaye on, 551.
Uracanthus, two new species of, 65.
Urari, or Indian arrow-poison, descrip-
tion of, 407.
Uredines, on the development of the, 465.
Valenciennes, M., on the anatomy of the
Nautilus, 241.
Valkeria, new species of, 363.
Vegetation, on the origin of some of the
lower forms of, 190.
Veronica, new species of, 457.
Vigors, N. A., notice of the late, 443, 555.
Viola, on the appendages of the anthers
in, 157.
INDEX.
Viscum album, on the development and
structure of the flowers of, 169, 171,
185.
Vrolik and De Vriese, on the alteration
which the atmosphere undergoes during
the development of heat in the spadix
of Colocasia odora, 161.
Wasp, on a South American, which collects
honey, 315.
Waterhouse, G. R., descriptions of cara-
bideous insects collected by Mr. Darwin,
120; on a new genus of Carabide, 145;
on Euchirus and Xylotrupes, 539.
Watson, H. C., on the geographical distri-
bution of British Ferns, 213.
Weaver, T., on the composition of chalk
rocks of invisible organic bodies, 296,
374.
Webb’s, P. B., Otia Hispanica, reviewed,
57.
Wernerian Nat. Hist. Soc. of Edinburgh,
proceedings of, 158, 344.
Westwood, J. O., on the Linnzan species
of Staphylinide, 149 ; on the develop-
ment of the Myriapoda, 150; on new
exotic Hymenoptera, 152; on the no-
menclature of the genus Chlorion, 435;
on the family of Pausside, 532; on
Anobium paniceum, 535 ; on the Eva-
niidz, 535; his Introduction to the
modern classification of Insects, re-
viewed, 53; his Arcana Entomologica,
reviewed, 323.
White, A., on a South American Wasp
which collects honey, 315; on new or
little known Arachnida, 471. :
Wight, S., on Echinus lividus, 523.
Willshire, W. H., Principles of Botany,
reviewed, 322.
Woods, J., on Crepis biennis and Bark-
hausia taraxacifolia, 437.
Woodward, S. P., on the Flora of central
Norfolk, 201.
Yarrell, W., on Motacilla alba, 350.
Zoological Miscellanea, 234.
Zoological Society, proceedings of, 58,
152, 226, 335, 503, 539.
Zoological travellers, information re-
specting, 226, 348, 520.
Zoophytes, Irish, catalogue of, with de-
scriptions of new species, 276, 363, 483.
Zygena malleus off Tenby, 234,
END OF THE SEVENTH VOLUME.
PRINTED BY RICHARD AND JOHN E. TAYLOR, RED LION COURT, FLEET STRERT.
a ¥ oe
Ann Mug. Nat. Hist. Vo\.7. PU.
Lr itis/e Aetliritadt
rhes del. = SSAC Sowerby seu ig,
i . in . i
i} ‘ = n Oe i
‘ y Tt Put re
yy }
ae
tet eee
Nae :
“i nes we
He
‘4
ash
is
7)
1
WN &
PALS oe 3
‘ie tnt
| _ 1
= 4 3
AEF EF ED EN ee — Vile @ +d Mote
’ =
*
Levelaporrert of Stora ee.
New LLCEC22.
CYVAIHCU COCCIHEL.
¥
\
Anak Mag. Nae List Vol. 7 Pi i"
By Lens Aldous, tom Zne- Day t Hag he LHS thee Gucers
oe
4 n peitis’
\ ae
eh wl 4 Me ‘lal
y
ies
font oo
, 4 va . mas eA
j \ i Se wa = 4 vil oy = eal
' i i *
ie ve, ii
“VOIMAWY S WOU ISIN ¥ SIMVITALNOS VULIAVYAN
"YR OLIN OT Y*
27? PUT Sor?
Arve. d MagNat Fir sZ VoL Z PLY
Oveis Polrr
OLBurrhel
LAC Litchtler ae. MER ot SewerDt SCU GP
Ann. d Mag Nat Llist Nol 7ZPLNVIL,.
}
‘ By & . _JP= ot , =
< SS Ss! [SRS ae ee 2 Z f
~ 2s a { \ y ;
. << q h 4 \al
9 % ~~ : 7 a VAR A Aa te
> ‘ fe i d } AON. 73 i
<< Ss \ \ % \ \ an
aia Sa 34 \¢ EA O \ teil An
- a ga \ ZS Dr, ? yoy OS
SS AIR a‘ gr AN oy \ & TS
2 = ; y i a
: S It gv 2 b X
A Zi bi \ =O : KK YAN
a, OK gh . ="
Sen g AA NS \
A GH wh Na Yas N
a y } \ WN
d g Ts = -
VhAuéarica articulate.
dund Mag Nat Hest No\7 P\ VIL
A Valheritt. WOW SPOS.
(a.
EM pyzpotliod CaMCE Ltt
oi LOLS Bren oe
eh Minas te SE =
7. Livvnidlarvca WU CCSCOWS.
2. Falherta wnbricata.
a
3. Langone Peppers? Wad.
EE SE are UND ely
,
ni
i
Sat a
or
M01 & Maga at Ltt st. Vol.7 PLIX.
1. Collcport, IAI OM TL. &
4 Lopriatia Cutati.
Vis . OYICHSE.
Oe: CM OSTA.
ie CHSTGHLS:
Gas RAIL,
ae ft telatd.
ones Wee LHL TS.
Ann.d-Mag. Nat List Vo\.7.V\. X
7]
sstis
pe
SDC Sowerhy scutp.
L24.Tubutlipora Cobatula
3.4 Alevoridiurre Ftrsucisre
ZB cfetreochoP tit Pee CONV CG CF 772
Ann Ad MagNat List NolG PLXi.
Aguilegia Vilgares.
_ ADC Sowerby scudp.
: n
sh igs
; SY snag in
Ann & Mag Nat Hest No\7 PX
ERA 2 REO
al) a eee Pw
SDC Sowerby feu lp
STtvchs10s COLU CVA
Lhe Vrart Flant:
= del.
Ann d Mag Nat Llrsi VoL7 Pl XU
LPruttlol the gg 777 plan?
Seed of Crane plant.
sa
= ee 4LGYS
of Glotoreriia PUTAMOLT TR.
\
Cloioreerea JUTadorui
SDC Sowerhy, feu tp.
,
}
|
}
j it
4 y ¢ |
ay e
Aad /y POY ?
‘ Tin : i
athe A, A +% )
i en i M i or iy mA: «4 £F cai i 1 Lhe { A
BINDING SECT. JUN 1¢ fe
QH The Annals & magazine of
1 natural history
A6
a7
Biological
& Medical
Serials
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY
_
ae
ts
eck &
net
sigh ey
r: Siting
"i
Po
ive he Ss
ze ts Sper = ae
SAAS <= sles i
*
f
ay
pik
BI Ae
xo
pf
eas
ie
Ben
one
iy
ie