m. ■^Mgr ]\rajor-General.A. A. MIJXUO, FKANT, SUSSEX, HARVARD UNIVERSITY. LIBRARY OF THE MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY /H >- THE SALMON. OCT 1 3 1931 EDINBURGH : PRINTED BY THOMAS CONSTABLK, FOR EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS. LONDON . CAMBRIDGE DUBLIN . GLASGOW . HAMILTON, ADAMS, AND CO. MACMILLAN AND CO. m'gLASHAN and GILL. JAMES MACLEHOSE. THE SALMON BY ALEX. RUSSEL EDINBURGH EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS MDCCCLXIV. S NOTE. Portions of this Volume have appeared in the Quarterly Review, Blackwood's Magaziiie, the Edin- burgh Review, and the Scotsman. A. R. Scotsman Office, Edinburgh, May 1864. PAGE C 0 N T E jN T S. CHArTEB I. VALUE OF THE SALMON. Property — Employment — Food — Sport, ..... 1 CHAPTER II. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. The Parr — Period of Emigration — Period of Immigration — What's a Grilse? — Natural Waste of Salmon Life — What are " Spring Salmon ?"—" Fish of the Salmon kind," . . 31 CHAPTER III. DECAY OF SALMON. Amount of the Decay — Periods — Causes, . . . .88 CHAPTER IV. SALMON LEGISLATION. Principles of all Salmon Legislation — Ancient Legislation — Its Curiosities — Suspension of Legislation — Renewal upon the Old Principles — Difference between Agricultural and Fishery Pro- perty— The Duke of Roxburghe — Upper and Lower Proprie- tors— Harmlessness of Angling — The Tweed Acts of 1857 VIII CONTENTS. PAGE and 1859— The Tay Act of 1858— Ness and Beauly Bill of 1860 — Committee of the House of Lords — Royal Commission of Inquiry for England — General Scotch Bill of 1861 — General Scotch Act of 1862— English Act of 1861— Irish Acts of 1842 and 1862, 134 CHAPTER V. FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. Scotch Fixed Nets — Pollution of Rivers, ...... 180 CHAPTEPt VI. NON-LEGISLATIVE REMEDIES. Domestic Breeding and Rearing — Fish, Flesh, and Fowl — Revo- lution in the Fish Market — " Peace, Reform, and Retrench- ment," 214 Table showing the Open Seasons for Net and Rod Fishing in Scotch Rivers, so far as fixed at May 1864, .... 235 Index 237 CHAPTER I. VALUE OF THE SALMON. Property — Employment — Food — Sport. There are at least two respects in which the subject of Salmon is important, and two in which it is interesting. It is important commercially, the salmon fisheries forming- ancient and valuable property, a large means of employ- ment, and a very considerable supply of food ; somewhat less important as furnishing an old and keenly-relished sport, the privilege of exercising which has become a sort of property superadded to the value for purely commercial uses. It is interesting as involving some of the strangest facts, the most instructive experiments, and the most perplexing mysteries in natural history ; and as having within these few years undergone inves- tigation more searching and legislation more \'igorous than for centuries before. The subject, too, is especially a British, or British- and-Irish one — still more especially a Scottish one. The great majority of countries have by nature been cut off from direct interest and from any kind of power in the matter, and no country has an interest at once so great and so imperilled as our own ; for upon few nations has the gift of the king of fish been conferred, A 2 THE SALMON. aiid by almost no nation more tlian this has that gift been neglected and abused. The great nations of the past, like Rome and Persia, longed to possess, the great nations of the future, like Australia and New Zealand, are labouring to obtidn, what we have been carelessly losing, or even wantonly destroying. When the patriotic Fluellen, in his eagerness to establish a parallel between Henry of Agincourt and "Alexander the Pig," not content witli alleging that there is a river in Macedon, and "also, moreover," a river in Monmouth, ventured to add that there were " salmons in both," he not only belied the high testimonial he had given himself as " a goot man in all particularities," but did injustice to the rarity and value of a privilege intrusted, not altogether worthily, to the now United Kingdom. For he was entirely wrong in the particularity of there being, or ever having been, "salmons" in the rivers of Macedon, or in- deed in any of the waters that feed the Mediterranean, — a deprivation all the harder upon the natives of those regions that, as appears pretty clearly from history, the Macedonians centuries ago, appreciated and practised the art of angling, being apparently one of the very few nations that borrowed that imjDortant portion of civilisa- tion from the Egyptians, who were the first, and perhaps for many ages the only jDCople, that " cast angles into the brook." When Alexander, leaving salmonless Mace- donia behind, led the way to the far East, he was un- consciously going in the wrong direction ; for there are no salmons in the Ganges either, and his "royal feast for Persia won" must have been wretchedly defective in its second course. More wise and fortunate was Caesar, VALUE OF THE SALMON. 3 who turned his attention to Gaul and Britain, and whose soldiers had no sooner reached the banks of the Garonne, than the saltatory motions of the salmon cleaving his joyous way through the fresh water, after his sojourn in the ocean, excited their attention, admiration, and appe- tite, and procured for him the specific name which has since stuck to him, and to which, though by reason of persecution greatly distressed both in body and mind, he still continues to do justice. We cannot be quite sure that Cresar ever dined off salmon, nor even that in- formation on such a point could be procured from him- self, did we know his present address, for he was one of the very few great men of history who were neither powerful nor particular at table. But we are warranted to please ourselves with conjuring up the image of the Roman soldiers, as they kept watch and ward by the wall of Hadrian and of Antoninus, ever consoling themselves with a cut from the "tail-scud" of a twenty-pounder, prepared in those three-legged camp-kettles which ap- pear to have been designed for the very purpose. And we can feel sure, too, of the contempt with which those old campaigners would look down upon the blinded and besotted aborigines of Northumberland and the south- eastern counties of Scotland, who, among other odious and unaccountable peculiarities of habit, are more or less authentically recorded to have entirely abstained from the use of fish. Can it be possible that the modern "black-fishers" of the Teviot have in their veins the smallest tin(iture of the Ijlood of these non-ichthyophagous barbarians ? In the interest alike of mankind and of fishkind, it is to be desired that they had ; that the breed 4 THE SALMON. had been kept pure, and the custom sacred. But to have done with the ancients, both foreign and domestic, although rumours of the dehcacy of the salmon reached the Eomans like a sweet-smelling savour, — though Pliny recorded what he knew of its habits, and Ausonius sang of its beauties and edible qualities, — and a demand for the article instantly sprung up among that knowing and luxurious people, supply for once did not follow demand, because the Alps intervened, and because the secret of packing in ice was only discovered by a Scotch laird, called Dempster of Dunnichen, about 1780 years too late for the Eoman markets. Putting together all the evidence that has come down to us, in history, poetry, and ancient laws, the conclusion is that the Three Kingdoms, but more especially Scotland, have from the beginning hitherto been pre-eminently the kingdoms of the salmon — at least, if we take into account consumption as well as production. In old times we obviously had a great comparative superiority over the two or three countries that could then be called our neighbours, and though we have undergone an alarming decay, our superiority as compared with neighbours — Norway, perhaps, excepted — is greater than ever, some nations having decayed much faster than we, and others having reached that extinction to which, until lately, we were only hastening. It is clear that, from Scotland at least, there was in old times a large export of salmon (chiefly salted), many curious proofs of the fact being found among the old Scottish statutes ; and it seems almost equally clear that England also had an over-abundant supply, except in those districts far re- VALUE OF THE .SALMON. 5 moved from the fisheries. If we do not now supply foreign markets, it is not because there is no foreign demand, but because we have not enough for our own supply, even as a costly luxury. Great Britain, in truth, has become more than ever the salmon-producing and salmon-eating country of the world, and when the fish ceases from among us, the end of all salmon is at hand. True, we are told by Sir John Eoss that the production of salmon in the Arctic regions is so great that in Boothia Felix 100 lbs. can be bought for a knife (knives are scarce), and that they are eaten to such an extent that he saw an Esquimaux dispose of a stone-weight to lunch, before beginning to dine in earnest dff the same dish ; and we have also heard of the abundance that pre- vails in Norway, and in New Brunswick and British Columbia. But, l6'^, almost all those places are, or at least have hitherto been, for market purposes inaccess- ible : 2d, the fish seem to be, in some of the most abounding districts, of a coarser species than that which would appear to be almost peculiar to the British rivers (indeed, so marked was the clifierence for the worse of the Arctic salmon, that Dr. Richardson, the naturalist of Sir James Ross's expedition, considered it quite a new species, and, by a somewhat equivocal compliment, named it the Salmo Rossii) : and, 3d, the salmon abound in those regions mainly because they have not been in the habit of being caught. In Norway, fish have been becom ing rapidly more scarce since ever our own anglers taught the natives the way and the advantage of killing them ; and one of the latest books regarding the salmon regions of North America (Hind's Labrador) shows in detail that 6 THE SALMON. as North American salmon hemn to come within reach o of men and of markets, they disappear as rapidly as have North American deer. To what, then, do we owe it that there still remains to us in this thickly populated country a fish which has become almost extinct among so many of our neighbours ? Next to the fact that naturally our sup- ply is great in quantity as well as unequalled in qunlity, we owe it to the law having cared for the fish, not always wisely nor altogether well, but better than if it had not cared at all. Of late years, various malign influences affecting the salmon have increased in power, and still more lately — though not, it may be hoped, too late — legislation has sought to provide proportionally powerful preventives and correctives, into whose efficiency and deficiencies it is here proposed to make some inquiry. Perhaps, however, there may be people inclined to ask what sufficient interest the publi(^ have in this fish to justify so much making of laws and of books. Among the answers that may be given to such a question are these : that salmon-fisheries are a property as ancient and marketable, to which the owners have as good a right, and which the law is as much bound to protect, as property in lands and houses ; and further, that they provide employment, food, and sport, all these three things, and not least the last, being good things, nnd worthy of preservation. The nature of the tenure of salmon-fisheries as Pro- perty is not the same in England and Ireland as in Scotland ; 1)ut in all the three kingdoms the property has for several centuries l)een recognised l)y law, and passed from hand to hand in gift or purchase. In VALUE OF THE SALMON. 7 Englciiid and Ireland, indeed, there is no clear legal distinction between a salmon-fishery and any other kind of fishery, and as a general rule a fishery of whatever kind — excepting on the coast and in the tidal parts of rivers — is an appurtenance of the soil ; but in Scotland, the right of salmon-fishing, both in sea and river, forms a property distinct from the soil, and belongs to the Crown, excluding those very numerous cases in which the Crown has conveyed the right to individuals and their heirs by express grant. It should l)e added, how- ever, that in Irehind (where both the laws and customs have long been in distracting confusion) there has always been practically more of a difierence than in Scotland or even Eno;land between the riofht of fishino- in tidal waters and in rivers. The right in Irish tidal waters has been held at common law to belong, not to the owners of the soil, as in Irish rivers, but to the Crown, as do salmon -fishery rights in the sea in England, and both in sea and river in Scotland. But again, there has been this difierence between Scotland and Ireland as to the law and treatment of Crown rights in salmon-fisheries : in Scotland, the right had been for the greater part granted away to private persons, and where not so granted, has not been used at all, at least not legally ; while in Ireland, except in a very few cases where the right had been granted away in ancient times, it has been held for and exer- cised by the public. In England, salmon- fisheries were recognised, protected, and regulated as property, l)y Magna Charta, and Ijoth in England and Ireland began to be legislated for as property at least six hundred 8 THE SALMON. years ago ; while in Scotland the property, besides having legal recognition equally ancient, has in multitudes of cases been separated for centuries from the soil, to which indeed it had in some cases never been attached, and has scores of times been separately bought and sold, divided and subdivided. The total value of the salmon- fisheries of the United Kingdom, as property, has, owing to a variety of difficulties, never been ascertained. In England, indeed, the value had lately become so small as scarcely to be worth reckoning or asking about. Of Ireland, the Irish Fishery Commissioners reported a few years ago : — " We have no means of obtaining an account of the aggregate annual value of the salmon- fisheries ;" but the value for Ireland has since then been stated semi-officially at about £200,000 a year, and rapidly increasing. On the other hand, a recent Eeturn (Pari. Paper, No. 227, Sess. 1863), purporting to give the name, owner, and poor-law valuation of every fishery in Ireland, brings out the not very grand total of £12,307, 15s. ! The tremendous disparity between these two statements is in part to be accounted for by the larger proportion of the Irish fisheries consisting of what is called " common fisheries," and so not rateable as property, and by many especially of the bag-net fisheries being divided into such small shares as to leave no one of the owners with what is termed a " con- siderable," w^hich seems practically to mean a rateable fishery. Indeed, we know of one Irish fishery, the rent of which is not much less than half of the whole sum which this Parliamentary Return gives as the rental of all the hundreds of fisheries in Ireland. All that can l^e VALUE OF THE SALMON. V learned about the value of Irish fisheries leads to little, except the conclusion that neither of the two statements referred to— neither that which shows £200,000, nor that which shows £12,307, 15s., — is useful for much except misguidance. In a considerably modified de- gree, a similar remark applies to a Parliamentary Return published in this present year, purporting to give the name, value, and mode of capture, of every salmon- fishery in Scotland. As this is the first attempt to procure ofiicial or authentic information as to the whole Scotch fisheries, it is welcome as a beginning ; but it has the rudeness and imperfection of a beginning. . It both omits and misstates. Many fisheries are not in- cluded at all ; of nearly 700 fisheries named, the value of 80, or nearly a sixth of the whole, is not given ; the principle on which the valuation is made is not stated ; it appears to have been made on quite differ- ent principles in different cases ; and in the great ma- jority of cases, the statement is far below the fact. Thus, the annual profits of the Duke of Richmond's fisheries on the Spey have been stated before Parlia- mentary Committees, by both the late and present Dukes, to amount to close upon £13,000 (more than the value of the whole of the Irish fisheries as officially returned !) ; but this Return puts at only about £9000 the value of all the fisheries in both the counties in which the Richmond or Gordon fisheries are situated. The actual rental or annual value of three Scotch fishery districts — the Tay, the Spey, and the twin rivers entering the sea at Aberdeen — amounts to nearly £40,000 ; and yet this Return makes the value for all Scotland only £52,615. 10 THE SALMON. The Return also, as being a purely Scottish Return, ex- cludes about three-fourths of the fisheries of the Tweed, both banks of that river being politically in England for the first jBve miles, which comprise the most valuable fisheries. When, therefore, it is said that the total annual value for Scotland, shown by this Return, is £52,615, it has also to be said that that sum is little more than a mul- tiplicand requiring to be operated upon by some un- ascertained multiplicator in order to bring out a correct result. All the facts that can be got thus serve Ijut vaguely to indicate the aggregate value of fisheries whicli, even confining the view to Scothmd, invade almost every- thing that can be called river, and sentinel at close though irregular intervals at least a thousand miles of coast. It is enough, however, for present purposes, that the salmon-fisheries of the United Kinodom form a property indisputable as to right, and reckoning as to rental or annual value l)y hundreds of thousands of pounds — as to value of product, hy at least three or four times the rental. Perhaps it may be desirable to add, for the benefit or tlie placating of such persons as may be disposed to think that, in such matters, la propriete cent le vol, that in England and Ireland a considerable proportion of the fisheries (in Ireland, it is said, more than a half) are not private property at all, but are as free to all comers as the fisheries for cod or ling. Similar difiiculties stand in the way ()f ascertaining the total amount of employment furnished by the salmon-fisheries, though here again it is comi)aratively VALUE OF THE SALMON. 11 easy to get the statistics of a few localities. Thus salmon-nets employ, on the Tay, about 700 men, receiv- ing in wages about £9000 a year, and on the Tweed, about 350 men, receiving about £4500. Even if the total value or rental were known, it would be impossible to deduce the total amount of employment, the propor- tion of labour to rent differing greatly according to the natural circumstances and the number of separate or competing fisheries in each river or estuary. But the question of employment may, for two reasons, be con- fessed as not entitled to very much weight in estimating the importance of the whole subject. It is an employ- ment which by law — the law of nature quite as much as the law of the land — cannot extend over much more than half the year ; and unfortunately, it is available only during those months in which other kinds of out- door labour are abundant, and is suspended during those months when the other kinds also fail. Further (as shall Ijc afterwards explained), the labour of salmon-fishing is to a great extent lal)our lost, an equal or greater produce being obtainable under a thoroughly reformed mode of fishing, with a mere fraction of the present toil and cost. Whilst thus admitting, however, that the question of employment is of more interest to the few thousands of men — an honest and stalwart race — who live by the dragging of nets, than to the community at large, it is still insisted that (so long, at least, as the present system of working fisheries is continued) the legal " protection" preserving their employment from extinction, is not and would not he given them at the cost of any one else, and that their loss wuuld be noljody's gain. 12 THE SALMON. Once more, kindred difficulties present themselves in estimating the total quantity of Food supplied by the salmon-fisheries, though a glance at one or two of the ascertained facts will let us see that in this respect also the matter is worth looking after. From the Reports of the Irish Commissioners, we learn that, in 1862, appar- ently an ordinary year, three Irish railways conveyed 400 tons, or about 900,000 lbs. of salmon, being equal in weight and treble in value to 15,000 sheep, or 20,000 mixed sheep and laml.is. In Scotland, the Tay alone furnishes about 800,000 lbs., being equal in weight and treble in value to 18,000 sheep. The weight of salmon produced by the Spey is equal to the weight of mutton annually yielded to the butcher by each of several of the smaller counties. The diminution in the supply of food caused by the decay of the Tweed fisheries, is about 200,000 lbs. a year. And in making comparisons between the supplies of fish and of flesh, it must be kept in mind that fish, or at least salmon, though higher in money value, cost nothing for their " keep," make bare no pas- ture, hollow out no turnips, consume no corn, but are, as Franklin expressed it, " bits of silver pulled out of the water." To the legal protection of salmon, therefore, there apply none of the arguments that are sometimes supposed to apply to cases falsely assumed as similar. When a man turns his land to the use of wild-deer, he takes away the food of a proportionate number of sheep ; when to an unnatural extent he preserves pheasants, hares, and partridges, the neighbouring fields must pay for it ; l)ut a salmon displaces nothing, eats nothing, comes in nobody's way. It is largely, indeed, because VALUE OF THE SALMON. lo the salmon is, in a more than ordinary sense, the free gift of nature, that its importance as an article of food has been undervalued or overlooked. Minute calculations and eloquent speeches are made on such points as the diminution (if any) of the supply of food caused by turning portions of a mountainous district to the pur- pose of feeding deer instead of sheep or black cattle ; but the inflicting of utter barrenness upon rivers, natur- ally yielding every year hundreds of tons of not only nutritious but delicious food, is a procedure which has hitherto received almost no share of public attention, much less indignation. Already, it may be safely said, three-fourths of the natural supply have been lost ; a little more care, and that loss may be repaired ; a little less care, and the loss may be made complete and irre- parable. Nor ought it to be forgotten that in this matter the public have a more immediate, if not a greater interest than the lessees, or perhaps even the proprietors, of fisheries. The number who desire and can afford to eat salmon as a luxury, and still more, the number that on certain occasions must produce the dish at table, has been and is increasing, and when an increasing or maintained demand and a diminishing supply meet each other, we find the result in aggravated prices. The greater the scarcity, the higher the price ; and in this comfortable conviction, and in the hope that the thing- would last their time, the larger section of the proprietors and their lessees have been, or at least were, until the recent legislation, going on competing with each other who should kill most and spare least, careless of the future. For many years they had, as Lord Polwarth expressed 14 THE SALMON. it a quarter of a century ago, been spending both interest and capital, encouraged thereto by their powers of niaking the pul)lic for a period pay for the extravagance. And when that period had come to an end, it would have been small consolation to the public that the salmon- proprietors (the lessees would probaljly have taken warning, and "got out") were the greatest sufferers ; there would not less have been a heavy and wanton injury to the community, a deduction from the national wealth, a gap on the national table, and (which brings us to the next head of discourse) an obliterated chapter iu the national sports. But is the salmon good for Sport ? There actually are people that will ask such a question, though to all l)ut the grossly ignorant it seems to verge on the insane if not on the profane. Perhaps there may even l)e some who, being assured that the salmon is good for sport, are capable of asking next, what is spo7't good for ? But to this extreme class we merely reply, that it is good for health and for amusement — at least as good for these purposes as much of the walking and riding that is done under the sun, and greatly better than most of the eating, drinking, and dancing that is done under the chandelier. AVe may consent to admit — for it is nothing to the purpose — that salmon-angling is actually one of the most costly, and is apparently — that is, to the eye of all but the person suffering — one of the dreariest and most desperate of recreations. The expense and the labour are great ; the material recompense inappreciable, and often quite invisible. The average cost of a salmon VALUE OF THE SALMON. 15 taken on the rodfislieries of the Tweed (and Tweed is not an extreme case) was hxtely calculated as varying between £3 and £5, countino; nothinor for time and for travelling expenses, — the latter item, it must be under- stood, Ijeing proportionately very heavy, because a salmon- fisher cannot, like a grouse-sh(joter, remain at his station f(jr weeks togetlier, but is restricted to only two or three days after each flood. Yet the money is cheerfully paid, and the disappointments no less cheerfully endured. Salmon-fishing is indeed a passion, perhaps unaccount- able as to its origin, but certainly irrepressible in an ever- increasing proportion of the people ; while in individuals the appetite, once implanted, almost invarial)ly grows rapidly till the end on the very little indeed that it now a-days has to feed upon. It is strange to think of the exceeding desperateness of the chaiices of success which suffice to tempt men away from their business and their fiimilies to some of our salmon-streams ; yet those who have most often felt and seen the hopelessness of the under- taking, are just those who are most eager to try it again. Look at that otherwise sensible and respectable person, standing midway in the gelid Tweed (it is early spring or latest autumn, the only seasons when there is now much chance), his shoulders aching, his teeth chittering, his coat-tails afloat, his basket empty. A few hours ago probably, he left a comfortable home, pressing busi- ness, waiting clients, and a dinner engagement. On arriving at his " water," the keeper, as the tone of keepers now is, despondingly informed him that tliere is " nae head (shoal) o' fish," although at the utmost " there may be a happenin' beast," or, as we have heard it expressed 10 THE SALMON, with that tendency to a mixture of Latinisms with the Border ijatois, which is to be ascribed, we suppose, to the influence of the parochial schools, " There's aiblins a traunsient brute." But in his eagerness and ignorance he knows better than the keeper ; and there he is at it still, in his seventh hour. The wind is in his eye, the water is in his boots, but Hope, the charmer, lingers in his heart. To many this is a marvel considerably greater than that which Byron stated and explained : — "Though shxggarrls deem it but an idle chase, And marvel much that men should quit their easy-chair, The toilsome way and long long league to trace, Oh, there is sweetness in the mountain air. And life that bloated ease can never ho[)e to share." For surely it is still more marvellous that men should quit not only their easy -chairs, but their native and proper element, in pursuit of something which they very seldom obtain, and which is to be got at home for a twentieth part of the money, and no trouble at all. Yet many there be that commit this folly and find a suffici- ent reward. And pray, asks the objector, what is that P Obviously something which unbelievers are incapable of understanding and unworthy of enjoying. It has been maintained, though not perhaps in cool print, by men of sense and sobriety— men not ignorant of any of the de- lights to which flesh has served itself heir — that the thrill of joy, fear, and surprise (now-a-days surprise is the pre- dominating emotion) induced by the first tug of a salmon, is the most exquisite sensation of which this mortal frame is susceptible — whether he come as the summer grilse, with a flash and a splash ; or like a new- run but more sober-minded adult, with a dignified and VALUE OF THE ^^ALMON. 17 determined dive ; or like a l)rowii-coated old inhabitant, with a long pull nnd a strong pull, low down in the depths. Without discussing this point in all its aspects, moral and physiological, it is enough that for a very small chance of attaining the salmon-angler's delight, whatever it is, there are multitudes prepared to pay and suffer without asking anything whatever that is injurious to other men, or to the public weal. Nor is it to the purpose that there are moments — rather perhaps only one moment — when the angler himself may half suspect his own rationality, — the moment when, after having toiled all day and caught nothing, he turns, soaked and shivering, to the hut which is his home for the night, seeing in his mind's eye his unsympathizing wife, his unansw^ered letters, and especially his vacant chair at the board of the friend whose good opinion and better dinner he has recklessly forfeited. For a moment the inclination seizes him to say with T(nichstone in the forest, — " When I was at home, I was in a better place." But it is but for a moment ; and then follows another strange effect. How is it that on or near the river-side everything he sees or tastes seems l^etter than are better things at better places ? — bad whisky better than the best claret ; braxy mutton than . the choice of Leaden- hall ; the conversation of a decidedly unintellectual keeper or boatman than the best mots of the best got-u]) diner-out ; and the repose on the pallet of chaff or straw deeper and sweeter than often visits beds of air or down ? Come how it may, come it does, that the dis- cussions, the jokes, the incidents of times like these, the memory cherishes and gloats over through man}' B 18 THE SALMON. years, and especially through many dreary close-times, when multitudes of things, doubtless much brighter and less worthy to fade, have been forgotten, or are re- membered but as wearinesses. In short, the whole affair, concludes the objector, even on your own showing, does not stand to reason — an idea which, perhaps, indignant anglers would prefer to express by saying that reason does not stand to it. But all this, it will be said, is ex parte ; the other side must be heard, or at least looked at ; — in the form of phrase employed in Douglas, You speak a fisher's — hear a fish's voice. To every transaction in angling, there are two parties, one at each end of the apparatus (as Dr. Johnson said, in an unpleasant way, which may be forgiven in consideration of the man having been blind and obese, and having deliberately preferred muddling himself over- night at " The Mitre," to answering in person " the breezy call of incense-breathing morn ;") and what may be sport to one of the parties is certainly death to the other. Admitted — and what then 'i Fish, like all the better members of the lower creation, were made to be eaten ; and in order to be eaten, it is necessary (always and carefully excepting the case of oysters) that they should be previously killed. Possibly some- body may be foolish enough to say — for twaddle bears a charmed life — that killing is cruelty, to be avoided, so far as possible, as an unpleasant necessity, not to he sought after as a pleasant sport. A maudlin heresy, born of ignorance and affectation. No people in this country, or indeed in Christendom, of whatever sect, rank, or condition, are in a position to charge anglers VALUE OF THE .SALMON. .19 with cruelty, except the Vegetarians ; and not even tliey, for in munching their bhides, they destroy myriads of peculiarly innocent and harmless creatures, existing or prospective : you take their life very effectually when you do take the means whereby they live — and their life besides. Just let the young lady who is shocked at the cruelty of angling tell us on what she has been dining. Is it not lamb, the flesh of the animal which all the poets, over whom she has such pleasure in sighing, have chosen as the very emblem of innocence and helpless- ness ? " Yes, l)ut / did not kill it ; I sought no pleasure in the poor thing's death." We join issue with you here, and insist that wherever there is any difference between you, the lamb-eater, and us, the fish-slayers, it is all in our favour. To get that joint of lamb, you hired a coarse and greasy butcher, who, with " unkind clutches" in its fleece, roughly seized the little bleater, tied its feet with cruel cords — those feet, you know, that gambolled on the hill and frisked over the mead, and so forth — dashed it roughly on a stool, and thrust a jagged knife through its innocent throat. " Shocking !" Very ; and all your doing. Miss ; that is, though you pretend not to know the history of a leg of lamb, done for your de- lectation, and in fulfilment of your orders — " Here comes the body of Caesar, mourned by Mark Antony, who, though he had no hand in his death, shall receive the benefit of his dying." In virtue of the prerogative given men over the fish of the flood — in obedience to that in- stinct to hunt and slay, implanted in aU the sons of Adam, and, as the chaplain in "Jonathan Wild" justly remarked of punch, " nowhere spoken against in Scrip- 20 THE SALMON. ture" — we quit the easy chair in which you loll whilst your lamb is writhing in the shambles, traverse hill and dale, plunge into the stream, and set our instinct against the instinct of the intended prey — our ingenuity against his cunning — our patience against his shyness ; in short, give him fair play, letting him pit all his powers of escape against our powers of capture. And we select for our purposes those fish that are most scarce and most difficult to snare, unlike you, who select the kinds of animals that cover a thousand hills, and that nature has left helpless. Again ; while your lamb, when seized, was harmlessly and helplessly " cropping the flowery food," what was our fish doing when snared ? Seeking to compass the death of a pretty and innocent insect ; and doing so, there is reason to believe, from a motive very similar to that which led us to compass his death — more for sjDort than for victuals. He was caught in the act. As much rioht as he had to come into our element in cruel pursuit of our fellow earth-born, had we to go into his. A brother of the trade has only done for him what he has done for myriads — and what he would have done for hundreds or even thousands more before nightfall of the very day on which we took him into custody. It is a trade established by nature, doubtless for wise, nay, obviously for neces- sary purposes. The small are fed on by the great, and these again by the greater still, in unbroken succession and perfect harmony through all creation, " the diapason closing full in man ;" except, indeed, in those exceptional and objectionable cases where a lion or tiger mars the harmony by adding another note. VALUE OF THE SALMON. 21 But then " the mode is cnieL" Denied, whether as compared with the usual modes of kilhng fowls and quadrupeds, or with the wholesale or trade modes of capturing most kinds of fish. Keep in mind that all animals do not feel as men feel, nor all animals alike, and that fish are pretty nearly at the bottom of the scale ; in brief, that Shakspeare's dogma about the equal corporal sufferance of giants and beetles, and all such fine sayings, may be sentimentally pretty, but are scientifi- cally nonsensical. On the other hand, take the case of fish killed in the way of trade and not of sport. No young lady ever thinks of bringing against the fishermen of Newhaveu, CuUercotes, or Cowes, the charges of cruelty she so savagely levels against her own brothers or mnle friends, who are fishers ; but the cod or haddock on which she regaled, before beginning the lamb (we lay out of sight, for tlie moment, the possibility of her hav- ing swallowed a few live oysters), sufiered more than ever did trout or salmon snared by angler, having pro- bably been caught on the fisherman's set line at twilight, and been kept hanging there till morning. But (and now we come to the last and lowest of sentimental re- fuges) why not kiU your trout and salmon by net '^ Partly, because that mode would be more destructive and merciless than the hook and line, and partly for the same reason that the sea-fisherman does not take his cod and haddock by net — because it cannot be done. Let us be logical. Either the fish killed by anglers could be killed by net, or they could not. In some cases they could ; but in such cases the use of the net would kill in greater numbers — would, in fact, extirpate, 22 THE SALMON. cutting off every fish iii early youth. Woukl that be more humane ? Is the death of a few, by a somewhat less painless process, not more kind than the destruction of a orreat multitude or of all : more in accordance with the great principle which reason and philosophy sanction — " the greatest happiness of the greatest number V In some other cases, perhaps the majority, the fish caught by angling are not to be caught by net — the so-called more humane mode. And here let it be noted also, that kill ing by net is not, generally speaking, more humane than hook and line. Even with the sweep-net, a fish, in a moderate-sized river, is as long in l^eing brought ashore as a moderate- sized fish usually is with good angling tackle ; while in all the other kinds of net, he undergoes, literally, the process of being hanged by the neck during several hours. But, passing from that, we have proved, first, that fish were made to be killed ; second, that ours is often the only and generally the most humane mode of killing them. It was suggested by Macaulay, and by somebody else long before him, that the objec- tion of the Puritans to the practice of bear-baiting was founded rather on the pleasure derived by the spectators than the pain accruing to the l)ear ; for the reasons above imperfectly stated, we venture to suggest that some })eople may object to fishing more for the delight it yields to the fisher than for the annoyance it may inci- dentally inflict upon the fish. It is of no use to argue that there must be something o ~ more than annoyance, seeing that a hooked fish resists, and, l)y inference, -suffers. To say nothing of the fact that a fish resists quite ns violently when he finds his VALUE OF THE SALMON. 23 whole l)0(ly in a net as when he finds a hook in his mouth, the mere fact of resistance is no relevant proof of suffering, and no adequate reason for compassion. The resistance very probably proceeds from a mere impatience of restraint, a love of liberty, which should inspire, not pity, but respect and l^rotherly sympathy, tending to draw him and us more closely together. Finally, anglers, besides only killing fish in one way that would otherwise requii^e to be killed in another, reduce the amount of killing in some other department, and even in the fish department, and in the aggregate. When people eat fish, they eat so much less flesh and fowl. Therefore the proper way of calculating the results of an angler's dealings with the animal creation is to reckon, not merely the number of fish whose lives he may have taken, but rather the number of fowls, lambs, sheep, and oxen whose lives have, by his labours, been preserved. Then arithmetic would fail to compute the amount of insect life of which the angler is the preserver as well as the avenger ; a small fish will take in a single day more lives than a great angler will take in a whole season. Further, compare the neatness and even agreeableness of the angler's mode of operation with the hideousness and brutality of those operations from the performance of which he has, to so large an extent, exempted the butcher and the poulterer — the exhilarating struggle and friendly Ivuock on the head by the pleasant river-side, with the felling, throat-cutting, and neck- wringing of the slaughter- house and the pen- -and it becomes clear, to all but those l)lind with an unwillingness to see, that the ways of the 24 THE SALMON. angler are almost as much ways of mercy, as of peace and pleasantness. Sufficient refutation, indeed, of the charge of cruelty might have been found merely in an enumeration of the peculiarly amiable as well as eminent men who have both praised and practised the truly gentle art. Without going the length of saying that all good men are anglers, we may say that most anglers are good men, and that angling has a tendency to make men good. It soothes and elevates, and leads to meditation and self-scrutiny. Many a man who, in the stir and pressure of active life, becomes hardened to the gentler and more generous emotions, obtains glimpses that make him less forlorn or more divine, when wandering "the quiet waters by." The true influence of the art is seen in its literature. A gentle and a generous man was Izaak Walton, the father of anoiing; literature — it had a mother long; l)efore in Dame Julyana Berners, the prioress of St. Albans. The same may be said of almost every man Avho has contri- buted to the subject, by no means excepting those of our own day — the Wilsons, Jesse, Scrope, Stoddart, Stephen 01i\'er, and many more. But this is not the strongest part of the case. While many good men have written whole books in praise of the art, how few, either good, bad, or indifferent, have dared to say a word in its dis- praise ! Of course, there was Lord Byron, who calls our old Izaak a "cruel coxcomb," and nctimWy prays — a thing which he was " l)aith dede sweert and wretched ill o' " — that strengtli might be granted to the "poor little trout" to pull /;? the said Izaak and all others who might try to pull it out. But the real truth is, that angling was far VALUE OF THE SALMON. 25 too pure and gentle a pastime lor Lara ; and it would be vain to reason with those who would take his authority, whatever use or warning there may be in his example, either as to what is cruel or what is coxcombical. Then of course there is, as already mentioned, Dr. Johnson with his sounding and senseless apophthegm (as he doubtless called it) about " a stick and a string." But he has utterly ruined his character as a witness by hav- ing committed himself to the opinion that " the throne of human felicity is a tavern chair." AVho can doubt that the learned sage w^ould, as a writer, have been much more natural and less made-up — mnch more of an Englishman and less of an imitation Koman — had he devoted to wandering on rivers' banks some of the time he employed in sitting upon his throne of human felicity, — had he listened more to the tongues that are in trees, and oftener read the books that are in running brooks ? But leaving the many good men who have written books expressly and solely in praise of the gentle art, and the one or two questionable persons who have ven- tured a remark on the other side of the dispute, look at what a mass of testimony wc have in the frequent and fond allusions of almost all our British poets. With the already disposed-of exception of Byron, not one English poet has one disrespectful allusion to the art ; while pas- sages might be cited from almost all of them showing that they loved, understood, and practised it. To begin pretty near the beginning, Spenser draws so many com- parisons and illustrations from the subject as to show that, notwithstanding his poverty, his courtiership, and his official and poetical labours, he had loitered by many 26 THE SALMON. pleasant water-sides. Tims, in telling that Archimago could not catch the Eed-Cross Knight by any of the devices that had once been successful, he expresses him- self— " The fisli that once was cauglit new bayt will hardly byte," — which is a piscatorial fact, not perhaps requiring much profound knowledge of the art, but still not likely to suggest itself to any but an angler. It is also another evidence in favour of Spenser being one of the initiated, that when he has' occasion to mention any river, he frequently and needlessly stops to catalogue the kind of fish to be found in it, — the knowledo-e he is so fond of displaying on this point ranging over a great part of Ireland, as well as England. Coming next to Shakspeare, we confess at once that there is no evidence now extant of his having been in the habit of taking a day's sport in the Avon or anywhere else ; but whoever reads any of those heavy yet unsubstantial books called Lives of Shakspeare, will find that information is missing about many other things besides this that yet the Bard must have done. There are, however, many allusions to ang- ling scattered throughout Shakspeare, several of them, we admit, showing no profound knowledge of the sub- ject. Thus Ursula, in Much Ado about Nothing — " The pleasantest angling is to see the fish Cut with her golden oars the silver stream, And greedily devour the treacherous bait." In the present day, this, so far from being " pleasant," is not possible angling, for if you see the fish, the fish sees you, and that's an end of it ; but some allowance may be made for the fact that this was written in an age w^lien British fish were in a comparatively primitive VALUE OF THE SALMON. 27 state of mind, and when man had not yet found out so many inventions for their destruction. Pope, as appears both from his poems and the testimony of contemporaries, was an angler, but only, we fear, a pond and perch man — speaking enthusiastically of " eyeing the dancing cork and bending reed." He evidently, however, knew well the technicalities and nomenclature of the art, and in his poem of " Windsor Forest" will be found the original of the descriptive catalogue of fish which SmoUet has plagiarized in his " Ode to Leven Water." Dryden also was an angler, and his contemporary Tom Durfey too, and were jealous of each other on that as well as other accounts, as we learn from Fenton : — " By long experience Durfey may, no doubt, Ensnare a gudgeon or sometimes a trout ; Yet Dryden once exclaimed in 2)artial sjiite, — ' He Jitili .'' because the man attempts to write." To name only one more among the poets of that era, Johnny Gay more than once makes a virtue of confess- ing himself an angler, and describes the process of secur- ing a " thumper," in a long and not very successful, but eminently practical passage. Among poets of the pre- sent generation, we name only the least likely of them all, AVordsworth, whose lines descriptive of trout lying on a blue slate would have shown him not destitute of all taste and knowledge regarding this subject, even if we had not Sir Humphry Davy's positive testimony tliat the poet of the Lakes was " a lover both of fly-fishing and fly-fishermen." What other sport, we may now ask, is consecrated by having been the subject of so mucli poetry and the delight of so many poets 'i None. Hunting — 28 THE SALMON. at least the tliino- called liuutiiio- in modern times — has been left to some nameless song-writers, and to poet Somerville and such small deer. Shootino- is absolutely and entirely without a literature. Both are modern and prosaic. Angling alone is ancient and poetical, and has been practised, and its praises sung, in all countries and generations. Then, passing from poets and poetry, look at the number and strange variety of the men whom angling is known to have had and to have amono; its most devoted followers, — great warriors, fierce politicians, and deep philosophers. ]\Iighty Nelson was almost as expert and enthusiastic in fishinoc as in fiorhtino- • and the con- stancy of his affection for the art is testified by his pa- thetic remark to a boatswain who had lost his arm at the same time as himself, " Jack, we're spoilt for fly-fishing," and by his afterwards resuming the prosecution of the sport with his left hand. Everybody knows how Paley, when asked by his bishop what progress he was making with his last great work, explained that he would apply himself steadily to the subject of Natural Theology as soon as the fly-fishing season was quite over, l)ut certainly not sooner. Of Sir Humphry Davy's ardour there is no need to speak ; not even how it once led him to the water-side in the north of Ireland on a Sunday, where, says the philosopher, " a man came up, exceedingly drunk, began to abuse me by various indecent terms, such as a Sabbath-breaking Papist," and carried off his rod, " with imprecations ;" nor how, when he went in quest of health and fish to other lands, he cursed " the blue rushing of the arrowy Ehone," in which he could scarcely get a " rise " valup: of the salmon. 29 for want of a " driuiimlt'." Then, to come; to another class of men, the late Henry Hunt was one of the best fly-fishers in England, not grudging, in pursuit of the art, to abandon the glories of demagogism and the profits of blacking-making. Thomas Doubleday, too, a dramatic poet of genuine power, and an ingenious writer on various subjects, who led the fierce democracy of the English coal districts during the Eeform struggle, is so devoted a Waltonian that he has, it is said, been known to address the once dread Northern Union at Newcastle, with the flies round his hat, and the air of Coquetdale still fragrant about him. It ought here, however, to be remarked, that, generally speaking, anglers are not fierce politicians, but men of quiet and peaceable lives, seeking solace under wrongs and oppressions in the eminently practical philosophy which Cotton indited and Walton endorsed : — " We scratch not our pates, Nor repine at the rates Our superiors impose on our living ; But do frankly submit, Knowing they have more wit In demanding than we have in giving." Women, too, have been slaves to this fascination, l)oth in ancient days and in these. Cleopatra, for instance (but not as instance of an amiable or even respectable woman), kept her punt on tlie Cydnus, — " Give me mine angle : we'll to the river ; " but, like other women, she had a way of her own, and behaved in a most unsportswomanlike manner in lier angling competition with Antony, " when her diver did hang a salt-fish on his hook, which he with fervency drew up." But why go to other times or to eminent 3(1 THE SALMON. names ? Almost every man knows among his own accjuamtances, and especially among the Ijest of them, of cases in which the love of angling has become, not only the one recreation, but the absorbing passion of life. A man is in our mincVs eye who could see nothing enticing in Milton's description of the celestial abodes, except where it is said that " The river of bliss through midst of heaven Rolls o'er Elysiau flowers her amber stream." On the other hand, we have heard of a person who was wont to derive consolation from the item of foreign in- telligence given by Shakspeare, " Nero is an angler in the lake of darkness," and who fondly imagined he had got a " wrinkle" as to the best bait for the river Styx. This gentleman, however, was afterwards brought to better behaviour and more cheerful views. And indeed the cases in which anglers are ever otherwise than good and cheerful men must evidently be exceptional. To say otherwise is not only to collide with facts, but to utter profanity against Nature — to assume that love of her is compatible and connected with love of cruelty and other evil things — that there is no virtue in " the impulse from a vernal wood,"^ — no teaching of love or gentleness in fragrant fields and cooling waters. NATUKAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 3 1 CHAPTER li. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. The Parr — Period of Emigration — Period of Immigration — What's a Grilse 1 — Natural Waste of Salmon Life — What are " Spring Salmon ?"' — " Fish of the Salmon kind." The natural history of the Salmon is not only in- teresting in itself— interesting for what is known and settled, for what is guessed and controverted, and for what remains as utter mystery and dire perplexity, — but is also important as having a bearing upon, or rather forming an essential part of, the commercial and legis- lative questions. Without some knowledge of how, when, and where the fish breeds, dwells, and feeds, it is useless to speak and unsafe to act. The amount, how- ever, of positive knowledge, the number of undis]3uted facts, attainable by inquirers, will not be denied (except by those who know very little) to be small, in com- parison with the amount of conjecture and the number of dogmas. The obvious natural difficulties of the question have been greatly aggravated by dogmatism, and, till within about thirty years, have scarcely been assailed by experiment. There is indeed almost no subject on which it is easier to dogmatize than the natural history of almost all kinds of fish, of which so much is unascertained and probably unascertainable. 32 THE SALMON. that questions diseiissed by Aristotle are unsettled yet ; and the salmon, exciting more curiosity than any other inhabitant of the water, has been more than an)^ other the object of visionary theories, narrow empiricism, stiff assertions, easy credulity, and obstinate unbelief — nay, several questions relating to the salmon have been discussed with as fierce an intolerance, as resolute a contempt for facts and reason, as much heat and as little profit, as if they had been questions in theology. A fiivourable field for all this was afforded by the natural difficulties in the way of investigation, or at least of ascertainment. The fish can be but obscurely and occa- sionally observed by man during one-half of the year, and during the other is not only invisible as to its habits, but is quite unknown as to its residence — after the salmon has left the rivers, we are ignorant not only of what he is doino- but of where he has 2fone. Ditfi- culties like these are to certain classes of people facilities. Sciolism plunges in where science is perplexed, and " practical men," with their few half-facts gathered from a merely local experience, are full of that certainty which is exorcised from the inquirer in proportion as he extends and deepens his investigations. The nonsense about the salmon that has been pul^lished under the name of natural history, and tlirust dos^n the throats of Parliamentary Committees, is, when looked back upon, appalling in amount, variety, and wort hlessn ess. To read some people's deliverances on the subject, they might seem to have collected their materials durino' a lengthened subaqueous residence, and to have come back speaking with a more than earthly authority. If, NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 33 indeed, a deputation of those omniscient authors and witnesses could be induced to stay below water for a few months, going down, say in November, taking their seat where they could observe the deposition and de- velopment of the ovn, — •" sitting under the glassy, cool, translucent wave," — accompanying their charge to the sea, and returning to their native element in autum.n, saturated with information, they would then, but not till then, be competent to speak with the authority some of them have assumed. There are, of course, difficulties in the way of such a commission of inquiry ; but, look- ing at the uselessness, and often mischievousness, of the magisterial manner in which many people handle the question, one is almost tempted to say, there would be no harm in trying. In questions regarding the natural history of the salmon, it will almost always be found, except with regard to one or two points settled by adequate experiment, that those people who have seen most are inclined to say least, and that those who have thought most are most at a loss what to think. The chief questions are, or have been, four in num- ber : — 1st, Is the Parr the young of the Salmon in earliest infancy ? 2d, At what age does the Smolt emigrate to salt water ? od, After what length of absence does the emigrant return to fresh water ? -Ith, In what shape does he return, " Grilse" or Salmon ? It has happened, not unluckily, but rather super- fluously, that the most decisive experiments in tlie natural history of the salmon have been directed to that point which was most capable of settlement by 34 THE .SALMON. ordiuary observation. That the parr i« the infant young of the sahnon was a fact so clear, or a conclusion so inevitable, before the experiments were made, that it would now be hard to conceive how it could ever have been in doubt, were it not that, even after the experiments have furnished the most ample demonstration, there are still to be found a considerable number of people who, instead of having been convinced, have only been enraged. A good deal, however, of the former, and almost all of the remaining confusion, arises from differ- ences in names and mistakes as to identity — the parr being known by many different names in different localities, and some of these names being in some dis- tricts and by some people apphed to such river trouts as happen, which is a frequent case, to bear marks resembling one of the distinctive marks of the parr. Even two hundred years ago (when such matters re- ceived but scant attention), this confusion of names was matter of observation and complaint. AVe find it alluded to in a curious, though, by reason of its pedantry and priggishness, rather unreadable book, by " Kichard Franck, Philanthropus," a Cromwellian trooper, who made an angling tour through a great part of Scotland about the middle of the seventeenth century, and pub- lished his experiences under the title of Northern Me- moirs, without obtaining almost any attention till 1821, when the volume was reprinted with a preface and notes by Sir Walter Scott. Speaking of " the various names given in England to the hi'ood of salmon," he says : — " Now, in the South, tliey call him samlet, but if you step to the AVest, he is better known tliore Ijy the name NATUKAJ. HLSTOllV OF 'I'HE 8ALMUx\. 35 of skegger ; when in the East they avow him penk ; but to northward, brood and loeksper ; so from thence to a tecon ; then to a sahnon." About the same period, Izaak Walton enumerates the names of samlet, skegger, and tecon as names of the young of the salmon, im- agining them, lioweve]', to be the young of three different species of salmon ; and he tells us that he knew [hj hearsay) of experiments on this point made before his day, not dissimilar in mode, object, and results to some that have been made in our own. Thus : " It is said, that after he is got into the sea, he Ijecomes from a sam- let, not so big as a gudgeon, to be a salmon, in so short a time as a gosling becomes to l^e a goose. Much of this has been observed by tying a ribbon or some known tape or thread in the tail of some young salmons which have been taken in weirs as they have swimmed towards the salt water, and then by taking a part of them again with the known mark at the same place at their re- turn from the sea, which is usually about six months after." Again, a hundred years later, we have Caj^tain Burt (an English engineer officer, who resided in the Highlands between the two Jacobite Eebellious, and wrote a book still of great value and interest), when referring to the river Ness, speaking thus : — " There is great plenty of a small fish the people call a little trout, but of another species, and is exceeding good, called in the north of England a branlin. Then they are so like the salmon frye, that they are hardly to be distinguished, only the skals come off the frye in handling, the others have none." Burt failed to see that the branlin and the " frye" are the same fish in different stages, and to note 36 THE SALMON. the fact that no fish are born with a silver scale or migratory dress, but assume it only a short time before they go seaward. The English Fisheries' Act of 1861 includes all the names above given as local names for the young of the salmon, except " locksper" and " tecon," mentions many more names, and comprehends besides " all local names," anywhere in use, though not specified in the Act. Such difficulties, however, as arose from this confusion of nomenclature would have been easily enough got over if the controversialists had really been seeking for truth instead of contending for victory, and had been willing to believe what any oljservant man could plainly see. About ten years before what were really the first decisive experiments, Mr. Scrope {Days and Nights of Salmon Fishing) wrote a long letter to the Eight Hon. T. F. Kennedy, M.P,, who had then a Bill relating to the salmon-fisheries before the House of Commons, in which the theory, or rather fact, that the parr is the young of the salmon, was stated with positiveness, and argued with great clearness and force. Mr. Scrope, of course, could only proceed upon the facts he had ob- served in the rivers — but these ought to have been enough— such as the absence of parrs from all l)ut sal- mon rivers, the disappearance of the larger parrs after May, and the finding, in spring, of the distinctive marks of the parr under the silver scales of the smolt. Sir David Brewster, also, having made an examination at the request of Mr. Scrope, gave his testimony that the eye of the parr has a formation precisely the same as that of the salmon, and quite different from that of the NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 37 trout. About eight years later, and still previous to the decisive experimeuts, James Hogg, the Ettrick Shepherd, gave the world some very good reasons of his own for holdiug the parr to be the young of the salmon, — reasons founded on observation and experience, partly on his having observed the gradual assumption of the migra- tory dress by the parr in the spring months, partly on his having caught as grilse fish which he had marked when parr, or when in their transition-state from parr to smolt. This, however, had little effect, beyond raising a crop of jokes about the license of poets in general, and of poet Hogg in particular. The fact is, that the brothers of the angle, especially the elder brethren, though the best of men, are rather addicted to stiffness in opinion as to things connected with the art. Almost every man had, till withiii these few years, his own theory as to the salmon and the pari-, which stood well enough, in so far as it was no more unnatural and irrational than any of the half-dozen theories of the half-dozen neighbours with whom he had debated, and which he probably clung to all the closer that it was purely and strictly his oivn, having no source in search, experiment, or even what could be fairly called observation. Amidst all these self-satisfied, and only self-satisfied theorists, Mr. Shaw — head-keeper to the Duke of Buccleuch at Drumlanrig Castle — ap- peared, in 1836, with his measurements, his plates, and his dates, the result of careful and repeated experiments — and almost instantly the whole tribe turned on him as a common enemy. Even had there been no proof l^y ex- periment, it would have given a most unfavourable idea of the amount of candour, or perviousness to conviction, THE SALMON. existing among those who, whether from a popular or a scientific point of view, have debated this question, to find that the denial of the parr being the young of the salmon was maintained for so many years in the face of these among other facts — that where there are no salmon there are no parr, and vice versa ; that where the salmon are artificially debarred from a river which they have been " accustomed to ascend, the parr disappear along with them ; that the young of the salmon' at the time when they are the size of parr, are otherwise unaccounted for ; and that parr, besides not growing as parr, are never seen to breed, nor are fmnd with developed roe. We defy any man to find a parr in a river to which salmon have not access, or a salmon in a river where there are no parrs ; and we could, of our own knowledge, J name a score of waters where parrs abound up to some obstruction, natural or artificial, impassable by salmon, and are c[uite unknown aljove it ; and also several where parrs used to be plentiful, l)ut where, since the con- struction of insurmountable dams, they have disappeared. All this is notorious, and was known as a popular and established fact even to Izaak AValton, who, though he knew little about salmon, knew that he had never met with parrs save in salmon-rivers. The fact at least proves, that in some way a communication with the sea is necessaiy to the existence of the parr ; and, if it is a distinct species, how comes it that no one ever saw, or ever said he saw, parrs, as parrs, emigrating or immi- I grating ? But JMr. Young of Invershin, Sutherland- \ shire (who has some disciples) seems to attempt to stifle > this difficulty by speaking of the parr as a " river-trout," J /..• Ce^.. ^^yO t^^-t^ /^ >v,,/ A7. J NATURAL HrSTORY OF THE SALMON. 89 meaning, we presume, a trout that has no connexion with the sea, although, by a universal " coincidence," it does not live anywhere without that connexion. Even here, however, another difficulty greater than the other rises before him. Did he ever see two parrs spawning ? Did he ever see a female parr with a developed roe ? He never did, and never will. He may see indeed, among the endless varieties of hues and marks exhibited by com- mon or fresh-water trouts, some trouts having mottles or finger-marks resembling those upon the parr, and ex- ercising all the functions of adult fish, but for all that a mottled trout is no more a parr than a spotted salmon is a trout. Fortunately, however, this point, unlike some others in the natural history of the salmon, not only admits of demonstration by seeing and handling, but has been demonstrated long ago, and over and over again. About thirty years ago, Mr. Shaw transferred some parrs from the river Nith to a pond that he had pre- pared for the purpose ; and after a certain period they assumed the migratory dress and movements — in other words, became transformed or transcoloured into salmon smolts. Here it was proved that the parr is the infant of the salmon, unless indeed it was to he denied that smolts are the youth of the salmon, in due time be- coming salmon themselves. Next, Mr. Shaw, watching till a pair of salmon had deposited their ova in a stream of the Nith, transferred the ova to an artificial stream connected with his pond ; and after a time the eggs were hatched, and the produce was parrs. Here it was proved that the salmon is the parent of the parr, just as com- ■iU THE SALMON. pletely as it can be proved that cocks and hens are the parents of chickens. The case was thus proved from both ends — the parr was shown to be the salmon in infancy, and the sahuon to be the parr in maturity. However, to make this double assurance trebly sure, Mr. Shaw caught in the river two salmon about to spawn, and having expressed their spawn within his own watery precincts, the result again in due time was parrs. Twenty years afterwards, similar experiments, on a larger scale, and with the same results, were made at the experi- mental and breeding ponds, Stormontfield, on the Tay, where parrs, and nothing but parrs, were hatched from the ova of salmon by hundreds of thousands ; and those experiments have been repeated at the same place with the same results in every one of the last ten years. No man has ever shown that anything else is ever produced from salmon-ova but parrs, nor that parrs are ever pro- duced from anything else l^ut salmon-ova, and until this is at least pretended to be done, no more is needed to be said. The question as to the age at which the young fish emerges from the parr stage, and assumes the appearance and habits of the smolt, has been disputed more ration- ally ; and though it has also been made the subject of experiment, cannot yet be regarded as quite decided — or if so, the decision, according to our view, is to the effect that the disputants on both sides are about equally wrong and equally right. Let us trace the growth of the young fish ah ovo as far as it was made visible liy the experiments of the seasons 1853-54 (which have not been found to differ from other seasons), in the Stor- NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 41 niontfield ponds. Ova were deposited on the 23d of November ; by the end of March the fish began to issue from the eggs ; and that process was entirely completed before the end of May — the hatching thus appearing to require from about 90 to 130 days, a result agreeing with that arrived at by Mr. Shaw ; but the length of this period may be regarded as depending very much on various circumstances, especially the temperature of the water, as varying with each season and with the month in which the ova happened to be deposited. There is agreement this far, and also this much further, that the fish hatched, say in March, remain in the river (though, partly from minuteness, partly from shyness, rarely visible before July) until April or May of the following year — that is, till from between thirteen and fifteen months after they have left the egg. It is here that the question arises. Does the parr assume the migratory dress and movements then, or a year afterwards ; i c, at the age of about one year and two months, or at the age of about two years and two months ? The doubt on this point, oddly enough, was incidentally raised, though it was also claimed to have been settled, by Mr. Shaw. When he l^egan his experiments, he had in view only the question as to the identity of the parr and the young of the salmon, and would appear to have had no doubt that the young of the salmon descended to the sea in the spring of the year following that in which they had been born ; and the facts apparently to the contrary, and also another and now apparently undisputed discovery, re- garding the apparently premature sexual maturity of male parrs, came upon him, so to speak, by accident and 42 THE SALMON. surprise. He found that the parr in his ponds remained unchanged and stationary during the second year of their existence, but assumed the migratory dress after enter- ing on their third year ; and that in its second wintei*, being then in its eighteenth or twentieth month, the i male parr (alone) arrives at sexual^ maturity, and does, j or can, impregnate the ova of the adult female salmon. ) It will he seen at once that there were two points here almost inviting attack — that as to the young of the ' salmon remaining two years before migration, and that as to the precocious and anomalous development of the young male. But because there was in both cases an appare7it anomaly, were we bound to conclude, as many people did, and even do, that there was an actual error ? On the contrary, we were bound to give j^Ir. Shaw's statements and reasonings the more respectful considera- tion when we found that he had as it were endangered the reception of the great truth which his experiments settled — that the parr is the young of the salmon — by adding two startling statements on other points, simply because they had been evolved in the course of his in- quiries. It shows at least that he entered on and con- ducted his experiments, not to maintain a theory, but to discover the truth. It may simplify tlip discussion, to dispose at once and in a few words of the subordinate or incidental cjuestion of the impregnation of the ova of the female adult salmon by the milt of the male parr. Of course there is an ap- parent anomaly in the system thus alleged to exist in \ the salmon race, of marriage between couples where the husl)anrl measures only about as many inches as the wife NATUKAL HISTOKV UV THE SALMON. 4P> f measures feet. But one part, at least, of the apparent anomaly is on all hands admitted to be fact — every observant angler knows, and the chief challengers of Mr. Shaw's conclusion do not deny, that male parrs do and that female parrs do not attain to sexual maturity. This being got over, there is little difficulty in believing what remains — on the contrary, the sexual maturity of the young male must be regarded as conferred by nature for a purpose and not as a freak. That purpose Mr. Shaw maintained to be the impregnation of the roe of the female salmon, and he maintained it, not because he had dreamed or preconceived it, but because, when looking- for something else, he had seen it. And often since his time, what he saw doing in the river, and \\'hat he after- wards did in his preserves, has been done with unques- tioned results in the experimental streams and ponds — the roe of the adult female salmon, suffused with the milt of the male parr, generated, just as if sutilised with the milt of the male adult salmon ; and the roe of female salmon, suffused with the milt of any other fish, or left unsuffused as it came from the female, did not generate ■ — so that there is botli proof positive and proof negative. Coming to the more important and more controverted question, whether the parr migrates at the beginning of its second or of its third year, the apparent anomaly of the theory that it does not descend either in the first migratory season after its birth nor in the next again, is in great part, if not entirely removed by a more or less fatal admission of those by whom the theory is disputed. Formerly, a pretty prevalent creed was that the ])arr 44 THE SALMON. migrated in its first year; but that is now quite exploded. Almost all the writers against Mr. Shaw maintain that the migration takes place at the commencement of the second year ; that is, that heing hatched in March or April, the parr descends to the sea in May twelvemonth. It is thus admitted that it does not avail itself of the first season of migration occurring after it has been left to its own resources and instincts. Now, is not this as much of what we, in our ignorance of the natural history of fish, regard as an anomaly, as is the staying over a second season of migration ? The question, then, must be considered without any regard to apparent anomalies, and decided only on the evidence of experiment and observation. Apart from the experiments that have been made under circumstances permitting the closest observation, there is a fact observable in all salmon rivers, which, if it docs not fully establish, remarkably coincides with the two years' theory. In the months of May, June, and July, full-sized parrs are to be got in the rivers, but in numbers much smaller than in either the preceding or the following months of the year. This, it will be seen, fits in exactly to the two years' hypothesis, which says that multitudes of the fish hatched two years before, and which were parrs in March and April, descend in May as smolts, and that the fish which were hatched that same year remain till autumn of diminutive size and retiring- habits, — so that the parrs seen in the rivers in the months of May, June, and July, are mainly those only of the previous year's hatching, i.e., of from thirteen to sixteen months of age — those of a year older than that Jiaving NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 45 just descended, and those a year younger having not generally begun to feed at large and show themselves to the angler or investigator. Unless the one-year party are prepared to maintain that the young fish attain to something like full parr size, and move about freely in search of food, within a few weeks of their birth, it would ; be hard for them to account for the fact that parrs are seen in the rivers in considerable quantity during the summer months, after the brood of the former year have, according to the one-year theory, gone do^7n to the sea. Nevertheless, all this, if forming a strong presumption against the one year theory, is not conclusive in favour of the two-years' theory ; for the facts are reconcilable also, and even more completely, with what may be called the half-and-half or mixed theory, which the weight of the evidence derived from experiments goes directly to support. One or two of the facts yielded by Mr. Shaw's experi- ments, and cited (not by himself) as evidence on this point, seem to us defective — those, for instance, in which parrs transferred from the river to the ponds in July put on a migratory dress the next April, for there were no certain means of knowing what was the age of the fish when transferred. The evidence, which equally satisfied and surprised Mr. Shaw, and which alone is admissible, was drawn from the case of the fish hatched in his own preserve, and kept under his own eye, from their birth till their migration. The fish which came out of the ova at Drumlanrig, in the spring of 1837, did not assume the migratory dress, and seek to depart in May 1838, as Mr. Shaw had expected, but did so in May ^ 46 THE SALMON. 1839. That was a fact, the fact ; and the same resuU was arrived at by experiments made in 1859 by Mr. Ramsbottom, at DoohuUa, in Gal way. It was the fact, but the question remained, Was it the only fact, and irreconcilable with other facts ascertained or supposable ? A great deal of argument was brought at the time against the result which Mr. Shaw appeared to have evolved ; but for a long time the argument was based only on probabilities and analogies, and not on actual know- ledge. There was, indeed, a sort of exception in the case of Mr. Andrew Young of Invershin, who conducted similar experiments, leading him, as he rather too eagerly and positively declared, to the conclusion, that the parrs descend shortly after the expiry of the first year. Mr. Young's e\'idence, however, was to a great extent vitiated by two causes. He failed to give an adequate account of the conditions under which his experiments were carried on, — the construction of the ponds, the care taken to prevent the mixing of broods, the constancy of the watch kept over tlie growth ; in short, he omitted everything that rendered Mr. Shaw's contributions to the question valuable and interesting. On one side, therefore, we have the evidence of an experimenter who told us minutely all he had done ; and on the other, the evidence of an experimenter who declined to tell any- thing but that he had made experiments. Further, Mr. Young had, rather oddly and unluckily, told the Royal Society of Edinburgh, in 1843, that he "entirely agreed" with Mr. Shaw ; whilst the experiments on which he founded his subsequently expressed entire disagreement with Mr. Shaw, were made in 1841. However, the NATURAl. HLSTUilY OF THE SAJ>MOK. 47 point might lisixa l)ceii regarded us still open to dispute, and it was, by a sort of common though tacit assent, laid over for decision by the larger and completer experi- ments carried on at Stormontfield, To the surprise if not the discomfiture of both parties, Stormontfield decided both ways, or neither way. The ova deposited in the end of 1853, were hatched in the spring of 1854, and the produce continued in the pond as paiTs cfuring the summer of that year. May 1855 was the time at which the movements of the young fish must decide the question. If Young was right in saying one year, they would then go off" ; if Shaw was right in saying two yeiirs, they would still remain. The result was perplexing : one-half, as nearly as could be esti- mated7~went off" at one year old, and the other half at two years {i.e., in May 1856). Here, besides both parties having been proved wrong and both right, was another apparent anomaly : those people who had been arguing or admitting that there was something ano- malous in the fish remaining two years before emigra- tion, were shown something much more anomalous in the fish going off" in two apparently pretty equal divi- sions at ages diff^3ring l>y a year. When it thus seemed so far ascertained that only half tlie fish migrated, a new hypothesis was brought out, to the effect that the females descend the first year and the males the second. This suggestionTwas not only supported by some curious facts drawn from experience on the river Wharfe, in York- shire^ Ijut it also " fitted in" to the fact, as already mentioned, found by Mr. Shaw in his expeiiments, besides agreeing with the observations of intelligent 48 THE SALMON. anglers, and propounded so far back as 1686 {De His- toria Piscium, by Eae and Willoiigliby), that the male of the young salmon comes to sexual maturity in its parr state. The hypothesis, however, was crushed by fts ap- pearing on investigation that the fish remaining during the second year consisted of both males and females, the milts of the males being fully developed, while the roe of the females was discernible only by a microscope. Thus in the end (for it seems the end), the disputants on this point have been left all in the wrong, or all in the right, and consequently a large proportion of them on both sides not only disappointed, but unconvinced. To account for the double or mixed response of the Stormontfield oracle to the question between the one- year and the two-year theories, doubts have been raised by the partisans of both views, whether the circumstances under which the fish were reared in and let out of the pond, were not such as to render the results unreliable as indications of what would have taken place had the fish been in their natural position and freedom, — one side, of course, maintaining that these circumstances acceler- ated, and the other that they retarded, the natural growth and movements. It was said of JMr. Shaw's experiments that the two-years' fresh-water residence of the fry was ascribable to the " difference of temperature between the waters of the Nith, from which the ova were taken, and the waters of the ponds in which they were hatched and reared." But where is the evidence as to what was the difference in temperature, or whether there was any at all ? On inspecting ]\Ir, Shaw's Observations for in- formation on this point, we can only find that the tern- NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 49 perature of the ponds, as compared with that of the river, was on one occasion three degrees below, and on another six degrees above. So whatever difference there was, seems to have been in favour of the pond stimulat- ing, not retarding, as compared with the river or natural hal^itat. But suppose it were otherwise, wdiat then ? We know that a lower temperature might retard the hatching of the fry by a week or two, or their growth by half an inch or lialf an ounce ; but we have no ground for supposing that it would retard for a whole year such a change as that of assuming the migratory dress — taking place, as that does, at a fixed season of each year — especially as the fact of that change not being dependent on size, development, or condition, is evidenced by the great difference in all these respects observable among the descending smolts. Again, on the one hand, it has been argued that the young fish at Stor- montfield were probably not sufficiently fed, else they might all have arrived at the migratory stage the first year ; but it is also said, and with fully as much show of reason, that as the fish were regularly fed with " boiled liver rubbed small," besides their natural supplies from the surface and the bottom, it is supposable that but for that none of them would have developed the migratory instinct until the second year. Still further, it is said that if the fish had been in the open river, subject to the influences of floods, they would have descended the first year ; but yet again it is replied, and with at least equal show of reason, that if the fish had not been led, or encou.raged, or almost driven out of the ponds, none of them would have removed the first year. D 50 THE SALMON. It will be thus seen, that the parties struggling against the Stormontfield decision differ mainly on the matter of fact whether the conditions of the experimental ponds were such as to stimulate or to retard the growth of the fish's instincts — whether, as Mr. Thomas Stoddart expressed it, " that, being kept in a state of comparative confinement, they had their growth stinted and their in- stincts overruled ;" or whether, as others maintain, by living in a warmer climate, by being better supplied with food, and by getting, as it were, an " assisted pass- age" as emigrants, they had not their growth hastened and their instincts prematurely developed. Both parties really proceed more or less necessarily in ignorance or assumption of the actual facts, the probabilities, how- ever, preponderating considerably in favour of those who maintain that the ponds must have a stimulating effect. Both parties also assume that the temperature of the water, the supply of food, and the ease or difficulty of egress, affect one way or other, to the extent of exactly a year, certain natural changes, for which it would seem more rational to assume that nature had appointed an unchangeable season. That gro\\i;h, and even sexual maturity, could be affected to such an extent by such means is quite credible ; but, as we have before sug- gested, it is not so easy to believe that such influences could alter by a whole year the time fixed by nature for not only turning from brown to white, but for removing from fresh water into salt. By far the most probable conclusion is, that the peculiar circumstances of the ponds did not operate one way or the other, but that we have been seeing in them just what goes on every year in the open river. NATUKAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 51 A small difficulty or doubt, however, affecting the half-and-half theory, remains even after we have accepted as decisive all that the ponds have told us. Though we know that some of the year-olds left the ponds for the river, wo do not know that they left the river for the sea. Placed between the conflicting assertions of the two parties, the inquirer may naturally ask, Had the young fish that left the ponds, after the close of their first year, the migratory dress and habits, or had they not ? For if they had, their departure was obviously a regular process of nature ; if they had not, their leaving the pond would not be sufficient evidence of their inten- tion then to proceed to the sea. Here, unfortunately, the accounts of the first and best known experiment were somewhat conflicting. On the 2d May 1855 {i.e. when, on the one-year hypothesis, the time of migra- tion had arrived), the fish in the ponds were examined l)y a highly competent committee, including Lord Mans- field and the late Mr. James Wilson the naturalist, and the decision was that they were 7wt ready to descend. But on the 19 th of the same month, there was a meeting of a portion of the committee, at which it was agreed that the fish ire7'e ready to descend. The grounds on which this latter conclusion was come to, do not appear to us to have sufficient extent or certainty. The prin- cipal fact mentioned is, that twelve of the fish were taken by the rod, and that, out of these, five were, ac- cording to the judgment of the persons present, in a migratory condition. These seem rather slender data on which to arrive at and put in force so large a conclusion, especially as even Mr. Shaw had stated tliat he had 52 THE SALMON. found a few individual exceptions to his second-year theory, and as the advancing season, witli its increased supplies of food, does give to all kinds of fish a clearer complexion or gayer coat, which might in many cases be mistaken, especially by those not disinclined to the discovery, for the sea-going garb of the smolt. Further, when the second year came round, it was found that the remaining fish had changed their appearance by the 26 th of April {i.e., a week earlier than the time when no such symptoms could be detected in the fish of one year old) ; they were going off in shoals by the 28th of April, and were all gone before the 24th of May— the migration of the fish of two years old being thus finished at a period of the season at which fish of one year had, according to the statements of the one-year champions themselves, scarcely begun to show the slightest symptoms of change. This was a fact pretty strong against the one-year theor- ists, but it was liable to the deduction or doubt arising from the great difierence of seasons as to temperature ; and the facts of the years that have passed since go to confirm the observations and twofold conclusions of the first year of the experiments. These facts have been most carefully noted and clearly recorded by Mr. Robert Buist of Perth, a gentleman who, from his long experience, his powers of observing, and his caution in coming to decisions, has done much service in the matter of the salmon, both as to natural history and commercial in- terests. The results, then, to which the evidence of the Stormontfield ponds seems to lead, in the question as to the period at which the young of the salmon makes its first migration, are chiefly these : one-half of the young NATURAL HISTORY OJ^^ THE SALMON. 53 fish emigrate after the end of the first, the other half after the end of the second year ; the date of departure varies to the extent of weeks in different years according to the temperature ; and, cceteris paribus, the two-year- olds go off a week or two earlier in spring than the one- year-olds. Although, on the whole, the evidence must, we think, be held as thus establishing that one-half of the young fish descend at one year, and the other half at two years of age, still if this compromise is not accepted, and a de- cision one way or the other is insisted upon, then it must be held that by far the weightiest and best tested evi- dence is in favour of two years. For, while there are doubts and disputes (at least as to the first experiment) in what degree the fish that left the first year exhibited the migratory instinct, there is no doubt whatever that a full half of the fish did not then exhibit any symptom of migrativeness, but declined all invitations to remove until the second year. The third question, AVhether the young of the salmon, after descending as a smolt, ascends that same season or the next, has been rather raised than laid by some rather loose experiments, which is the more to be regretted, as its settlement would also have conduced very greatly to the settlement of the preceding point, as to the age at which the smolt descends. If, at the experiment first made, a portion of the Stormontfield smolts, supposed to have descended to the sea at one year old, had been sufficiently marked, and some of them been captured that same season after their return from the sea, it would have been made certain, both that the one-year- 54 THE SALMON. old smolts that left the pond had descended to the sea, and that their residence there extended to only a few weeks. But — probably because this point did not in- volve the chief or primary object of the experiments — care was not taken at first to manage so as to bring about anything that can be safely regarded as a decision. Of the smolts that left the pond the first year, between 1200 and 1300 were marked by -cutting the second dorsal fin, and of these 2 2 are stated to have been caught as grilse that same season ; of those that left the pond the second year, 1135 were marked by cutting the tail, and of these " several" are reported to have been caught as grilse in the course of their season ; and Mr. Buist has reported similar results in more recent years. Such facts must of course reckon as something ; but there are several serious deficiencies in the evidence on that side, and some very formidable facts on the other. No firm faith can be placed in the system of marking by cuts — any one that, by examining the heaps of fish as they are tumbled from the nets, or by any other means, has had an opportunity of observing the great number and in- finite variety of marks and maimings produced for the most part, it would appear, from encounters with marine enemies, will have a strong distrust of any such tests. It is not enough, we submit, that out of .the 30,000 or 40,000 grilse caught in the Tay in 1855, twenty-two had an abscission on a certain fin, such as was inflicted on 1100 of the smolts of that year ; it might perhaps have been as possible to find among the 40,000 twenty- two individuals with a cut on their tails similar to that Avhich was not inflicted on the smolts till the next year. NATUllAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 55 It lias also to be taken into account that, on the Tweed and other rivers, a variety of experiments by cutting had been going on for years, and that some of the fish operated on elsewhere might have wandered into the Tay. If cutting were to be relied upon at all, it should be not a mere slice, which the teeth of a seal or porpoise may accidentally imitate with complete success, but something peculiar, and, so to say, complicated and inimitable, such as the perforations on railway-tickets (o 000 (^2,). While the evidence in favour of the ascent being made in the same season as the descent is thus wanting in positiveness, there is evidence very positive in quality, though small in quantity, to the opposite effect. Of all the smolts marked by the attachment of rings or other effective means, whether in the Tay or other rivers, no7ie have been got, as either grilse or salmon, the first year, and several have been got the second year. Of the Stormontfield smolts of the second year — descending in spring 1856 — 300 (in addition to the 1135 which were cut) were marked by silver rings ; and of these none were got. It is quite possible indeed that all of the 300 that escaped their enemies in the sea, or even, we will suppose, the entire 300, "no wanderer lost," may have returned to the Tay as grilse that season, and yet none of them have chanced to be caught. But from other quarters we have what seems posi- tive evidence in favour of the second season. In various years a great number of Tweed smolts were marked by a silver wire passed through and fastened to the back part of their tails ; none of them were got as grilse or salmon the season they were marked, but the next season 56 THE SALMON. several of them were caught as most indubitable grilses. Still later, experiments on the Tweed, apparently on a smaller scale, but conducted with great care, have brought out the same results. The Duke of Roxburghe has pre- served in his possession a fish which was marked as a smolt by the insertion of a peculiarly-shaped wire tlu'ough his gills on the 14th May 1855, and which was caught on July 21st of the following year as a grilse, weighing 6 J lbs. The more recent experiments of Mr. Eamsbottom, at DoohuUa, have also gone to support the doctrine that the fish does not return until after from thirteen to fifteen months in the sea ; smolts turned out of the nursery -ponds, and marked in May 1862, having been caught as grilse in June, July, and August 1863, though there is in this case a possibility that the smolts may have been turned out before they were ready to emigrate, and may, after their expulsion, have spent in the river one of the two years which Mr. Eamsbottom assumes that they spent in the sea. To what conclu- sion, then, on this point do the experiments conduct us 1 To nothing absolutely certain ; but as a probability, supported by evidence small in amount, but strong in quality, to this, that some at least of the smolts do not ascend as grilse, or as an}i;hing else, till next year, or fifteen months after their descent ; and as another pro- bability, supported by evidence greater in amount, but not so strong in quality, that some of them return the first year, or three months after descent. It may thus be that both views are correct (and here let us state that the merit of having raised wholesome doubts and intelligent objections to the generally accepted same- NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 57 season theory lies with the hxte Mr. W. Paulin of Berwick) ; but giving proper weight to the consideration that most of the ascertained facts, as distinguished from the disputable ones, go to support the second-season theory, that side has perhaps a present advantage in the controversy. The actual evidence in favour of the second-season view might be supplemented by arguing that, as a grilse weighs more pounds than a smolt does ounces, or, in other words, has increased in weight about twentyfold, it is more rational to suppose that that great change took place in fifteen than in three months ; but even the keenest partisan of the second-season theory ought to forego that advantage, it being desirable in such questions to proceed only upon what has been seen or ascertained, not on what may be only reasonably con- jectured or even logically inferred. On the other hand, there is one fact affording a very strong presumption in favour of the same- season theorists, which we put separately, because the fact, though quite unquestioned, does not amount to actual demonstration on the point in dispute. Grilses invariably ascend two or three months after the smolts of that season have descended ; or, to state it in an- other form, there are no grilse until the smolts have been some time departed. Now, if grilse have been a preceding winter and summer in the sea, why should the time of their ascent bear so rigidly fixed a relation to the time of the descent of the smolts, when we find that the adult salmon, which is, or has always been held to be, the same fish one year older, makes its ascent in some proportion in every month of the twelve ? 58 THE SALMON. But liere we are brought up with a jerk, so to speak, by the new and startling question. Is the grilse a grown and transmuted salmon-smolt ; or, in other words, is a grilse an adolescent salmon ? Till lately, there was no question about it,— it was held that the smolt returned as a grilse, and that the grilse was simply a virgin-salmon, or a salmon on its first ascent. Lately, how^ever, these assumptions have been strongly assailed — first questioned in a book, and then pronounced upon in an authoritative way by a Committee of the Commissioners of the river Tweed, who say, in their Eeport (1863), "Our opinion, from the experience of the last twenty years, is, that grilses never become salmon of any stage whatever." This is an audacious and almost unheard-of heresy. It could scarcely be said to have ventured into the light till a year or two ago, when a Ross-shire laird, a salmon controversialist by hereditary descent, inflamed with what he thought a great discovery, " came rushing from his mountain home," and hurled a biggish book, charged with heretical matter, among a generation all sections of which had been accustomed to accept the old orthodox doctrine as l)e- yond doubt or question. Great was the astonishment, and just the indigna- tion, of the baker's wife in " Candide," on hearing that there was a man down stairs who hesitated to declare his belief in the fact of the Pope being Antichrist. But what was that display of unbelief to some which we are doomed to witness in this bold and sceptical age ? Here was a man — a Man of Ross — who actually hesitated to declare his belief in the popular and accepted fact of a Grilse Ijeiug a young Salmon. Nay, worse ; that luck- NATURAL HISTOKY OF THE SALMON. 59 less prig Caiidide did not, in dealing with the baker's wife, venture on any counter proposition, but simply declined to enter on the Catholic question at all, on the preposterous plea (destructive of half the controversies which enliven the world) that he knew nothing about it, whilst he did know that he was starving, and that the lady's husband was a baker, whom he had just heard make an eloquent speech in praise of charity. But our heretical friend, Mr. Mackenzie of Dundonnell, went the length of an entire denial of the orthodox ichthyological creed, and greatly aggravated his offence by showing that he did know a good deal about the matter regarding which he had arrived at such unhappy opinions. Indeed, the heresy Was so bold and wanton as almost to justify suspicions as to the motives of the heretic. To " make a reputation," it is perhaps a surer way to table a nega- tive of something that everybody has taken as unques- tionable, than to discover something positive that nobody had thought of If a man were to arise, preaching that ducklings do not become ducks, nor leverets hares, nor lambs sheep, he would, according to what has hitherto been the scientific, and almost equally the popular apprehension, be in much the same position as that in which this undaunted northern placed himself. What if Dundonnell has been actuated, not by a reckless zeal for what he conceived to be the truth, Imt rather by a burn- ing thirst for fame ? AVhat if he has been only frenzied with an ambition like to that of Eratostratus, and sought to gain an undying, if undesirable, reputation, l)y setting fire to the Tay, the Tweed, and all other salmon rivers ? 60 THE SALMON. It is not SO ; he is full of his subject, not of himself ; and seems to have as keen a feeling for the honour, dignity, and especially the independence of the grilse, as he could have were that interesting fish a sept of the Clan Mackenzie. But if he had had somewhat better evidences of his doctrines, he would certainly have suc- ceeded in setting fire to one of the theories of our natur- alists, and to many of the acts of our legislators. To say nothing of the interest attaching to the question as one involving some very curious facts in natural history, it is important to know whether our legislators have been here all along proceeding on an erroneous assumption — taking for granted that they were dealing with one species of fish, when they really were operating upon* two distinct species, having different habits, especially diflerent seasons, and therefore, to some extent, requiring different legislative treatment. It is certain that Mr. Mackenzie has found room to raise doubts — chiefly, however, by the use of positive and plausible statements, in opposition to what has hitherto been the popular, if not unanimous behef ; and to support these with an ingenuity which in some cases succeeds in at least perplexing, and in refusing to be set aside by mere off-hand denial. Still we are not disposed to like the mode in which he has conducted his argument, and we are disposed, having doubtless been predisposed, to dispute his conclusions. The form in which he proceeds is the dangerous one of dialogue. A friend named " H." is allowed to indulge in mild sug- gestions in favour of the old orthodoxy, and then " M.," as is the manner of Highland gentlemen, replies with great heat and vigour, dirkuH/ his inoftensive antagonist NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 61 in every round. In fact, the combat is too like a " cross." " H." appears to us rather too amiable a person to deal on anything like equal terms with a man so terribly in earnest as " M." is about grilse. Struck by the incom- petence of "H./' and actuated by the impulse which leads generous minds to sympathize with the weaker party, we shall step for a little into " H.'s" shoes, and see if we cannot make a better fight of it. Having put ourselves in training by going through a course of the evidences, we feel stimulated to the resolution of im- ploring Dundonnell to bear with us whilst we attempt to show, to his entire dissatisfaction, that, after all, he and the Tweed Committee are quite wrong, and the re- mainder of his fellow -creatures quite right. It is strange that there should be room left for a doubt on the subject ; or that, if there be room, the doubt should not have been raised until these latter days. It is true that a few " practical fishermen," here and there, have been known to whisper the heresy which Mr. Mackenzie first publicly preached, and which has now been (nominally) adopted by the Tweed Commis- sioners ; but none of these early and obscure perverters' of the faith were known to have given intelligible reasons for differing from their neighbours. On the other hand, it must be admitted that, owing mainly perhaps to the want of any formidable opposi- tion, our naturalists have rather assumed, than proved or tested, the common theory ; and let us say, as a fact which will be forced upon any one who takes a run back over the writings of naturalists on the Salmonidoe during the last thirty years, that there has been an appalling 62 THE SALMON. number of assumptions propounded as settled facts, and afterwards more or less quietly withdrawn, and the cor- rection substituted. Look, for instance, even at the excellent James Wilson's article " Ichthyology," in the seventh edition of the Encyclopcedia Britannica (1838), and at the answer which, more Scottice, he gave himself in 1840, by asking in Blackwood the question, "What's a Parr ?" Although the fact is chiefly due to the previous absence of question or controversy, still it is a fact, that almost any naturalist, if asked how he knows that a grilse is a young salmon, would not be able, on the moment, to lead any more satisfactory evidence than general and apparently instinctive belief. But such answers will not suffice in questions susceptible of proof by fact and experiment, though necessarily admissible, and often even the best of evidence, in cases of another class. There is a story told of a Scotch minister, on a catechizing raid, after having got the proper answer from a ploughman to the question, Wlio made you ? proceeding most unfairly to the further question, " How do you know ?" Jock grew red in the face, scratched 'his head, and then, rising, by an instinctive leap, to the height of the argument, replied, "It's the common clash o' the kintra," Now, this was a sound if grotesque answer, on the main question of natural theology, in which a general assent, founded on instinctive per- ception, is one of the best of evidences. But in such questions as those of natural history, or at least in this question, where there are attainable facts sufficient to settle it one way or the other, it will not do to adduce the " common clash." It is only lately, however, that NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 63 tlie facts can be said to have been publicly and formally called for ; and the case must now go to proof. Whether a grilse (admittedly a fish of the salmon genus, but smaller in size, and slightly different in ap- pearance, compared with the fish everywhere acknow- ledged as the true salmon) is an adolescent salmon on its first ascent from the sea, or is a distinct species, compris- ing, of course, both adolescent and adult fish — that is the question. All scientific, with almost all popular belief, supports the first proposition ; Mr. Mackenzie of Dun- donnell, and a few others who have not ventured upon paper, maintain the second. As in most ichthyological questions, especially those relating to the migratory tribes, there is an insufiiciency of direct evidence ; and what there does exist of direct evidence we shall reserve till after the leading of the circumstantial proofs. The points to be dealt with relate to the habits of the fish, especially as to season — to the proportion that salmon and grilse are found to bear to each other, both in given rivers and in given years — to the size or weight — and to the shape or appearance. What we shall adduce under these heads will, we hope, be found to go almost the whole way to prove that there is some sort of connexion between the two kinds, or rather sizes, of fish ; and a very long way to prove that the connexion or relation is that of youth and adult. Foremost among those evidences we would j)lace the fact (already alluded to in discussing the period of the fish's first return to fresh water), that salmon ascend rivers more or less in every month of the year, whilst grilse do not ascend at all until a certain period, and 64 THE SALMON. then, so to speak, come all at once ; from which two facts, we submit, it is a fair inference that the one is an adult fish, capable of ascending at any time, and that the other is a young fish which first attains to the capacity of ascending at that season at which its ascent is practically found to begin. Or put it thus — the difference in the time of ascent points to the inference that salmon are the produce of several years, and grilse of only one year. It may be possible to dispute the inference ; but it is necessary, to a fair discussion of the question, that these facts should be looked at, and, if possible, fitted with some other explanation. It is the chief defect of Mr. Mackenzie's argument, that he not only overlooks these and similar facts, but founds upon assumptions to the contrary. Thus, he begins by saying, that " a grilse's instincts, in some respects, are different, though its habits are precisely the same ;" a proposition which, if it does not contradict itself, is at least contradicted by what follows : — " Ex- perience shows us that salmon, impelled by their in- stinct, leave the sea for their home or rivers in winter and spring, whereas the grilses do not leave the sea for the rivers until summer ; clearly showing that the one is a spring, and the other a summer fish." How the two fish thus described can be spoken of as being of " pre- cisely the same habits," is perplexing ; yet, though it might seem at first sight that the greater the diff"erence of habits the better for Mr. Mackenzie's theory of two different species, it is yet a fact that, in the above pas- sage, he under-^tsite^, as well as ^lizs-states, that differ- ence. The difference is not that the salmon is " a spring NATURAL HISTOIIY OF THE 8ALM0N. 65 fish," and the grilse " a summer fisli," but, roundly speak- ing, that sahnon come at all seasons, and grilse at only one season. The assumption that salmon cease to ascend in summer, is utterly inadmissible, though there are some rivers where, owing to temperature and other natural conditions, the statement is, in a loose sense, partially true ; and we shall bring that, and some even more imjDortant statements, to the test of the only au- thentic figures we know of, showing the capture of the different kinds of migratory Salmonidce in each month of the year. The following shows the proportions of salmon, of grilse, and of trout (almost entirely the Salmo eriox), to every 1000 of each kind caught, on an average of years, in the net-fisheries of the river Tweed : — Salmon. Grilse. Trout. February (2d half of), . 22 0 8 March, 5Q 0 7 Ai^ril, 89 . 0 23 May, 128 1 56 June, 138 13 173 July, 233 371 254 August, 151 408 164 September, 113 154 129 October (1st half of), . 71 53 186 /O 0 /, /ooo. /oOO, There is here, in the first place, sufficient refutation of the statement that the " salmon is peculiarly a spring fish," and peculiarly not " a summer fish ;" for we see that, on tlie Tweed at least, the months showing the smallest proportions of salmon to the whole take of salmon, are February, March, and April ; and the months showing the largest proportion, June, July, and August. But the point to which we direct attention is the E 66 THE SALMON. contrast, or contrasts, shown as to season, l)etween grilse, and not only salmon, but also trout. It will be under- stood that the theory which we support assumes the salmon column to comprise only the adults of a certain species, the grilse column the youth of the same species, and the trout column both the adults, and, for part of the season, the young, of quite another species ; whilst Mr. Mackenzie's theory assigns to the salmon and the grilse columns respectively both the young and adults of a dis- tinct species. Now, let us see whether the facts ascer- tained are most reconcilable with our theory or with Mr. Mackenzie's — with the old orthodoxy or the new heresy. The most important contrast lies in the fact that, whilst (doubling for the odd half month) 44 in each 1000 of salmon, and 16 in each 1000 of trout, are captured in February, and the take of both goes on increasing till, in May, salmon have reached the propor- tion of 128, and trout of 56 per 1000 ; grilse, on the other hand, are entirely absent in the first three months of the season, all but entirely absent in May, and show but a small advanced -guard even in June. These facts are at least reconcilable with, if they are not demon- strative of, the theory that the grilse is a young fish, performing its first ascent. Grilse do not ascend, as do salmon and trout, in February, March, April, or even (in the case of Tweed) May, because they are then only descending in the condition of smolts, or are undergoing their growth and transmutation in the sea. Or look at the figures of the latter portion of the season as above exhibited, and they will be found to witness to the same efiect, though not quite so conclu- NATUIIAL HLSTOllY OF THE SALMON. 6 7 sively, as the figures of the earlier months. In the months of July and August, nearly eight-tenths of the whole grilse of the year are captured ; in the month of August alone, more than four-tenths. But Septemljer, as compared witJi August, shows a diminution of two- thirds, or 6 6 per cent., the capture of that month being three-twentieths of the capture of the whole season ; October shows a dimanu- tion of another third ; and November, were the fishing continued, would probably show pretty nearly a blank. Turning, however, to the salmon, we find that in those two months, July and August, when eight-tenths of the whole grilse ascend, only four-tenths of the whole salmon ascend ; that in September, when the grilse have de- (treased 66 per cent., salmon have decreased only 30 per cent. ; and that in October, as compared with Sep- tember, when grilse show a decrease of another third, salmon show an increase of nearly one-third, and have become again almost as numerous as they had been in September. Briefly, salmon ascend in every month of the year, in numbers, comparatively speaking, not very unequal ; grilse, speaking roundly, do not ascend at all in the first half of the year ; all of them, but a fraction, ascend within two consecutive months in the middle of the year, and in the latter months of the year their ascent almost ceases. Mr. Mackenzie would account for all this by saying that these are two diff*erent species of fish ; and he finds it necessary to go the length of saying that the one is a spring, and the other a summer fish. It might be possil:)le, were there no facts beyond those we are at present dealing with, to assume that there are two species of migratory fish, (ine of them, not a 68 THE SALMON. spring, l)ut an all-tlie-year fish, the other niamly a summer fish. All that we maintain, on the evidence yet adduced, is that the facts are at least equally compatible with, and indeed entirely suitable to, the theory, that the fish coming up all the year are the adults of various ages, and that those rushing up in a body in summer are the young of the same species. To the same effect, though necessarily with less dis- tinctness, is the rather curious evidence supplied by the trout column in the preceding table, which, according to the hypothesis we are maintaining, differs from the salmon column, comprising only adults, and from the grilse column, comprising only what we shall call, perhaps not with strict accuracy, adolescents, in comprising both the adults and the adolescents of another species. Because the trout column comprises adults, it shows, like the salmon column, a larger or smaller number ascending every month in the year ; because it contains also adolescents, it shows, like the grilse, a great and sudden increase in certain summer months. Up till the end of May, the trouts are few, but in June they suddenly increase by 3 0 0 per cent., salmon in that month increasing only 1 2 per cent., and they increase another 50 per cent, in July, in which month nearly a fourth of the whole capture is obtained. We account for this feature by saying that here we see the effects of the adolescent trouts, on their first ascent, being added to the adults ; and, though rather anticipating another portion of our argument, we may add, that this view is supported by the falling ofl' in the average weight of trouts during the months when we sup})ose the young to l)e makino- their first ascent. NATUltAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 69 Then, as has been clone with the salmon and grilse columns, take the latter portion of the year : in August, as compared with July, the trouts fall off nearly 40 per cent., and in September decrease by other 20 per cent. ; which shows, as in the case of the grilse, that the run of young fish is slackening. It is true that in October the number of trouts again increases, but that arises chiefly from the well-known fact that in that month, and later, comes the great rush of trouts seeking to spawn ; and, even if this were not notorious, the fact that these late comers are adult fisli, is indicated by the average weight and size being much greater then than in any montli preceding. Is there any producible explanation why the supply of trouts, extending more or less over the whole year, should so suddenly increase for a short time in summer, but the hypothesis that at that time we ar(.' getting the fish whi(ih are only on their first ascent, along with those whicli are on their second, third, or fourth ? And do not the facts, that we see a similar, but greater and more sudden increase and decrease in the grilse, and do not see such indications in the salmon column, supply, to say the least, a very strong presumption that in tlie trout column you have both young and old, in the grilse column only young, and in the salmon only old fish ? In order to put our best foot foremost, we have not adhered to logical sequent;e, and now adduce a fact which properly should have come first in order : the fact that salmon and grilse are always found together — i.e., that where there are no salmon there are no grilse, and where there are salmon there are grilse, and vice 70 THE SALMON. versa ; and further, that the two fisli are found not only together, but bearing numerically a certain rough propor- tion to each other. In the earlier stages of the great parr controversy, as already mentioned, a similar fact — that where salmon were present, parr were present, and wherever either were absent, so were the others — played a great part, forming the chief weapon of the supporters of the theory that the parr is the fry of the salmon, but was not held conclusive till afterwards confirmed by Mr. Shaw's and subsequent experiments. Neither in the present case can the fact of grilse and salmon l>eing always both present or both absent he held as conclu- sively jjroving a connexion, though it supplies a very strong presumption ; and the supplementary evidence, though attainable, is not yet forthcoming in a complete shape. But we are not altogether without evidence additional to the fact of the two fish being always co- inhabitants. The difficulty we have here to meet is the fact that the presence of the salmon and grilse in this or that river might be explainable merely by the facts tliat they are both migratory fish, and that the rivers are accessil)le or inaccessible to botli alike. But salmon and grilse are not the only migratory fish ; and what if we can show that other migratory fish of the same genus abound in some rivers, and are almost unknown in others equally accessible, whilst the same thing is never seen in the case of salmon and grilse ? — that is, there are no rivers almost destitute of grilse and al)Ounding in salmon, or the opposite. JMr. JMackenzie says, " The Tweed bull-trout, commonly known as the ' black-tail,' NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALAfON. 71 M very coiisj)iciious fish, may be intercepted on its way fi'om the north, but it lias never yet been seen to the south of the Tweed ; and if its instinct was not perfect, the Dee, Don, and other rivers, by this time of day, would abound with it, as the Tweed does." There are here two serious errors in matter of fact, as well as a correct statement which goes quite against Mr. Mac- kenzie's argument. One of the errors we are not much concerned to correct here : " lilack-tail" is the local name not for the bull-trout {Sahno eriox), but for a very much smaller fish — one of the tribe of the Sahno albus, now generally held by naturalists to be only the young of the Salmo trutta, or whitling. The other error, which we have a greater interest in correcting, is the statement that the bull-trout is " never seen to the south of the Tweed," when, in fact, the two rivers immediately to the south, the Aln and the Coquet, are full of that species, to the almost entire exclusion of salmon and £rilse. Mr, Mackenzie, however, is perfectly correct in saying, that if the instinct of the Eriox, like that of migratory fish in general, were not pretty nearly perfect, it would be a common fish in the rivers to the north of Tweed, the mouths of which it is held to pass in its marine migra- tions. The facts as to the Sahno eriox, or l)ull-trout, are, that in the Tweed that species is four times more numerous than the adult salmon, and as numerous as both salmon and grilse taken together ; that in the two rivers to the south of Tweed, there are apparently about fifty bull-trouts to one salmon or grilse ; but that in the Forth, the Tay, and other large and accessible rivers to the north, the species is filmost a stranger. In short, the 72 THE SALMON. Itiill-trout is seen to be entirely independent of the sal- mon and the grilse, being found in great multitude M'here they are almost entirely absent, and vice versa. ]^ow, if the grilse were a species as distinct from the salmon, or Salmo solar, as is the bull-trout, should not we find similar results, some rivers abounding with grilse, yet almost without salmon ? But what is found is not this, but the contrary : many or few grilse imply many or few salmon. Mr. Mackenzie makes a sort of loose or partial denial of this fact, by adducing the statement, that the Shin in Sutherlandshire, a valuable salmon river, contains so few grilses that they " are not calculated upon as part of the commercial produce." But we have ascertained that this statement, so inv as it is correct, is entirely explained away l^y the fact that the Shin river is fished, not by nets, but by a criiive, the hecks of which are of such width as to permit most of the grilse to pass. This, of course, accounts for the grilse forming a very small part of the commercial value of the river ; but it does not prove that few grilse frequent the river ; in point of fact, they al)ound in much the usutd proportion to the salmon, and as many as twenty have often 1)een killed by a single rod in one day. Besides, the fact, which we do not deny, that the proportion of grilse and salmon capturcd varies greatly in a comparison between different rivers, would not in the slio-htest invalidate our arsfument, nor establish Mr. ]\Iackenzie's ; because the proportion of captures of each kind is regulated not entirely l^y the numbers of each frequenting the rivrr, Ijut by various <^thor <'ivf'umstancos, l)oth artificial and natural. For NATUEAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 7P> instance, the net-fishing used to be voluntarily stopped in some rivers before the run of grilse had nearly ceased, whilst in others, the fishing was carried on for six weeks later, or till after the conclusion of the run of grilse ; and the difference is great between different rivers and estuaries as to the natural facilities for capturing a fish which does not rest and loiter like the adult salmon, but rushes on, if Mr. Mackenzie will permit us the phrase, with the ardour of youth, and of youth, too, on its marriage- jaunt. But such cases do not destroy the fact that salmon and grilse are always either both, or neither, in- habitants of any given river ; and comparatively few of those cases even disturb the fact that they are found present in certain proportions to each other, and just in such proportions as we might expect to find between the adolescents and the adults of the same species. Take next the test furnished by a comparison of season with season, instead of river with river. Mr, Mackenzie says, " It is a common remark amongst fisher- men, that though the salmon fishery may be bad, still the grilse fishery may be productive ; eacli fishery vary- ing in quantity to correspond with the favourable or unfavouraljle season in which they were spawned — clearly showing two distinct fisheries and nature of fish." Not at all. The "common remark among fisher- men," the accuracy of which we have no motive to deny, does not necessarily imply two distinct kinds of fish ; l»ut, at least as probably, diffei'cnt broods of the same fish, born in different years and representing different spawning seasons. Not only, however, is Mr. Mac- kenzie's fact as to orilsc l)t'inof sometimes abundant in 74 THE SALMON. years when salmon are scarce, and vice versa, of no more value to liim tlian to us ; but if he had looked a little more closely, he would have been staggered to see how much of method there is in tlie relations which the sup- plies of each bear to the supplies of the other, which method has apparently a great deal of meaning. It is a pretty general belief among old fishermen that a good grilse season is more than likely to be succeeded Ijy a good salmon season in the year following, and a bad grilse season by a bad salmon season ; and, though we are shy, on such subjects, of the mere dicta of " practical men," who generally derive their data from a very narrow range of experience, and draw their inferences with no very enlightened regard to logical rules, yet on this point they could scarcely go far wrong ; and we can adduce some authentic returns, which, in a very remarkable way, cor- roborate their belief and our explanation of the fact on which their belief is founded. The latest period of five years, for which we have returns of the take on Tweed, shows an annual average capture of slightly more than 9000 adult salmon, and of shghtly less than 24,000 grilse. In 1851, the first year of these five, the take of grilse was only 1C,855, or about two-thirds of the annual average ; and in the following season, 1852, the take of salmon was only 5808, bearing just about the same proportion — viz., two-thirds — to the annual average of salmon, as did the grilse of the year preceding to the annual average of grilse. But in 1852, grilse rose to nearly 29,000, con- siderably ahore the annual average : and in 1853, salmon rose to 9200, also considerably above the annual average of that period of five years. In 1853 there was a great NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 75 tcake of grilse, 43,000, or considerably more than one-lialf above the average ; and in 1854, salmon reached 15,300, also more than one-half above the average. In 1854 grilse declined to 16,739, one-third below the average; and in 1855 salmon declined to 6239, also one-third below the average. In a word, the proportion which the grilse of any one year bore to the average number of grilse, is found by these tables to have been just about the proportion which the salmon of the folloiving year bore to the average number of salmon. These facts seem almost too neat and complete as evidence of our theory that the grilse of one year are the salmon of subsequent years — not, indeed, that they "prove too much," but that they fit into our doctrine so exactly as almost to give them the appearance of having been made to measure- ment. But similar results are seen in a less regular and perfect form, in the less regular and perfect returns from other fisheries. Probably the Mackenzieites may hold them to be only coincidences ; liut they must also admit, that they are not only very remarkal)le, l)ut for them exceedingly disagreeable, coincidences. The element of weight or size, which may be held to include that of growth, is very important ; but Mr. Mackenzie so deals with it that there is some difficulty in getting hold of him. He says : " One simple and palpable fact, which any ordinary observer might have remarked, is, that grilse in May weigh from three to five pounds ; in July they are met with as large as from ten to twelve pounds ; and instead of finding them in August and September grown to the size of sixteen or twenty pounds, which would l^e but natural if they continued 76 TPIE SALMON. to grow to become salmon, they apparently begin to grow backwards ; as in October we have them as small as we had them in May, not growing one inch larger from that time till they return to the sea in March and April as kelts. ... If grilse grew to be salmon, and as rapidly as is generally supposed, we should have no grilse in October, but all salmon." We have two accusations against this passage : the ideas are confused, and the allegations are unproved and improbable. In the first place, there is a confusion between the individual and the species. Mr. Mackenzie speaks as if the grilse that ascended in May w^ere the same individual grilse that ascends in the later months of the year, and asks why the individual has not grown any in three months ; whereas there are two different persons, of much about the same age, in so far as they were born in the same year, the difference in their periods of ascent arising mainly from the slight difference of several weeks in the date of their birth or of their descent, and from the variety of circumstances that have shortened or prolonged their residence in the sea, the late-comers being for the most part those wdiich have remained longest, and consequently grown largest. In the second place, Mr. Mackenzie has strangely assumed that it is maintained that grilse grow into salmon whilst in the fresh water ; whereas, wdiat is maintained is, that besides not growing in size in the river, grilse do not even begin to groiv into salmon until they return to the sea ; that they ascend as grilses, descend as grilse-kelts, and after their return to the sea become salmon, and as such reappear in the rivers. Then, as to the facts. NATUEAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 77 where is the evidence for saying that grilse are small in the beginning of the season, large in the middle, and small again at the close ? Mr. Mackenzie may be in possession of such evidence, but he has kept it to him- self. We also have some evidence on the point, of which, in no expectation of gratitude, we shall give him the benefit. On a series of years, the average weight of the grilse captured on the Tweed fisheries was — in the month of June, 3 11). 11| oz. ; July, 4 lb. 51 oz. ; August, 4 lb. 15 oz. ; September, 5 lb. 12| oz. ; October, 6 lb. 11 f oz. These figures are refutatory of the statement that Q^rilse diminish in weio-ht towards the end of the season, though we are aware that it may, and sometimes does happen, that there are great temporary variations, caused by the differences of seasons affecting the tem- perature of the atmosphere and of the water ; as, for instance, in a warm summer the grilse of July or August will be larger than in a cold summer. But the state- ment, even if correct, would not help Mr. Mackenzie, nor injure us. If it were true that grilse fluctuated in size during the season, and were even smallest in the latest months, the fact would prove nothing in favour of the fish l^eing a distinct species, and nothing against, but rather something in favour of, their being adolescent fish, born in one year, though with a difference of weeks as to birth, and of various circumstances as to growth. What we do see is', that (at least in the case of Tweed) grilse go on increasing gradually in size to the end of the fishing- season ; that increase, such as it is, being, we maintain, caused mainly l^y many of the late-comers having had a more protracted residence in the sea, where 78 THE SALMON. alone the migratory Salmonida', subsequent to the infant stages, have any perceptible growth. A different result is seen in the case of trouts, the average weights of which decrease during those summer months during which the young, or first-ascenders of the species, add themselves to the older fish ; a comparison between the two columns in respect of weight, as we have already seen in respect of number, showing just such differences as would arise from one column comprising only old fish, and the other both old and young. But, besides showing that Mr, Mackenzie fails to make anything in his favour out of the facts as to weight and size, we show that, in at least two respects, those facts are dead against him. 1st, There is a great range between largest and smallest in salmon, and a very small range in grilse ; 2d, There are very few — roundly speaking almost no— salmon of those weights which may 1 )e called the grilse weights. Taking even monthly aver- ages, which obviously can bring out very imperfectly the facts we speak of, the average weight of Tweed salmon in one month is 7 lb. lOf oz., and in another month 16 lb. 2f oz, ; and everybody knows that there are com- paratively few salmon below the smaller of those monthly averages, and a great many above the larger — a fact corroborated by the month which shows the largest average weight showing the greatest average number, and by the month which shows the lowest average weight showing also l^y far the smallest number. But we do not see this in grilse — the diff"erence between the smallest and the largest (excluding, of course, rare in- dividual cases), being seldom so much as three pounds. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 79 What we say is, that the wide range of size and weight in the case of sahnon shows a wide range of ages and circumstances, and that the comparatively small range of size and weight in the grilse, we shall not say proves, but indicates, a very much narrower range of ages and circumstances. But as we are here perhaps open to the reply, such as it is, that the grilse may nevertheless be a dis- tinct species, its narrower range of size being accounted for by its being in its adult stage a much smaller fish, we go on to the second point, and ask. Where are the salmon when they are of the weight of, say, 4i or (3 lbs. ? That salmon of such weights are often got, is true ; but it is also true that, in proportion to the whole number, that is the weight at which by far the fewest are got — especially that many more are got much above than at or about those weights. There are fewest salmon of the weight of which there are most grilses. Now, as at some time or another every salmon must be of those weights, the presumption is that we ought to see many more of them than of the higher weights, which, in the main, signifies the greater ages— in short, if Mr. Mackenzie's theory were correct, we ought to see more salmon of those small sizes than of the large sizes, just as in our own species we see more youths than elderly people. Those youthful salmon do undoubtedly exist. Mr. Mackenzie, if he hold to his theory, cannot tell us where they are. We point to the grilse, and say, there they are. On the point of appearance, Mr. Mackenzie possesses whatever advantage or disadvantage there is in the fact 8U THE SALMON. that the difference between a grilse and a salmon cannot be very easily described. But what interest has Mr. Macikenzie in maintaining that there is no obAdous or reliable distinction in appearance between a salmon and a grilse ? Maintaining, as he does, that the two fish are different species, the more visible the distinction the better for his argument, and the worse for our argument that they are the same fish. It is more easy to dis- tinguish one variety from another, as a setter from a terrier, than the young from the old of the same variety, as a young terrier from an old one. But Mr. Mackenzie afterwards makes a half- admission that there ai'e visible differences. He says, " Fishermen affirm" (and he doesn't deny) " that a grilse has a younger appearance than a salmon." Well, that is c|uite enough for our purpose — and far too little for his. That is just about as much distinction as there is between a lamb and a sheep, or between a grouse or partridge of this season and its father or mother ; and yet everybody who has any occasion for the know- ledge, does know the young from the old of Ijirds and beasts, although, in very many cases, any attempt to describe the difference, in the absence of specimens, would be a complete failure. Mr. Mackenzie afterwards adds, " The only distinction I could ever ascertain is that the tail-fin of a grilse tapers off to a finer edge than in the salmon." Well, that may be rather a fine dis- tinction as between two species, but is broad enough for the distinction between an adolescent and an adult fish of the same variety, as between the maiden and the mother, 'ilien ]\Ir. Mackenzie, as if aware that he had NATURAL HISTORY OF THE SALMON. 81 got upon slippery grouiid, tries to slide off with tlie re- mark that " this distinction is observaljle in the smolts also." This is quite a new statement, never heard of before, and therefore the more imperatively requiring that proof of which it has as yet received none. Who has observed the distinction ? — where is it recorded ? Every schoolboy on the banks of the Tweed (where almost alone the salar and the eriox are found together in plenty) knows at a glance the difference between the smolt of the salmon and of the bull-trout— the "black- fin" and the "orange-fin." But the knowledge of the alleged distinction between the smolt of the salmon and. of the grilse, if not hitherto confined to Mr. Mackenzie, is a piece of useful knowledge certainly not yet diffused. Mr. Mackenzie tries again : " The absurdity of the theory consists in the assertion that the smolts of salmon, going down to the sea iii company with the smolts of grilse, also return from the sea under the denomination of grilse." Where is the absurdity ? There is just as much absurdity in supposing that the families of ewes who have never bred before, and of ewes who have often bred before, both appear under the denomination of lambs. A pretty strong point made by Mr. Mackenzie is the allegation, supported by many appearances, but also contradicted by some facts, that salmon and grilse are never seen paired in connubial relations. This would be a powerful fact if established, for we do not see the young of any other species cohabiting only with the young, or the old only with the old. But then, in the case of animals in their wild or natural state, we have F 82 THE SALMON. a very imperfect knowledge of their proceedings, espe- cially in the breeding season of spring, when the fur or the plumage of old and young have in few cases much visible difference. Further, salmon are migratory, and we do not know the habits of migratory creatures in that respect — for instance of swallows. Further yet, though we must yield to Mr. Mackenzie the fact that whenever a pair of fish of the salmon kind are seen together on a spawning-bed, they are seen to Ije, with comparatively rare excej)tions, pretty much of the same size ; yet in the water the eye is not capable of distinguishing in the case of two fish, say of seven or eight pounds, whether both are salmon, both grilses, or one of each. Besides, the fact cuts both ways, as indicating that, in the pro- cess of pairing, the choice is regulated mainly by con- siderations of size, not necessarily, nor probably, by the consideration as to whether any fish of the desired size is on its first ascent, or at some later stage of its career — whether maid or widow, bachelor or widower. All that we see really proves, not that salmon and grilse, but that large fish and small fish, have a dislike to form matrimonial relations with each other. Finally, in the experimental ponds at Stormontfield, the ova of an adult female salmon were impregnated with the milt of a male grilse, the ova fructified, and the progeny were undis- tinguishable from those produced by two adult parents. This fact, indeed, we might have made both the first and the last of our replies to the allegation that grilse and salmon do not breed togetlier ; but as the point does not seem to have received very much attention at those admirable ponds, and as there is always a possibility of NATURAL llLSTUliY UF THE SALMOX. 8?. mistake in siicli experiments, the question perhaps eoiiM not fairly he hehl as demonstrated. There is, however, one experiment which might settle, and we thought had settled the matter beyond all doiil)t — namely, the mai-king of grilse-kelts on their descent, and their capture on their reascent. Mr. Young of Invershin, writes that (besides marking salmon-smolts that have returned as grilse) he has often marked grilse, and that they have returned as salmon ; Mr. Mackenzie says he has done so also, if not as often, with an opposite result, the fish returning as grilse. There have been many experiments condu(;ted by marking on the Tweed ; l)ut these not having been conducted with any special refer- ence to this particular point, the results are meagre almost to uselessness. There is there no case at all in favour of Mr. Mackenzie's theory, but there is only one in favour of ours. A grilse-kelt of two pounds, marked on the 31st March 1858, was caught, on the 2d August of the same year, as a salmon of eight pounds. Here again there is a possibility of a mistake, and the matter really remained to be demonstrated by experiment. That de- monstration seems to have been supplied by the Stor- montfield experimenters, by whom many grilses, marked when grilse-kelts, have been recaptured on their reascent as salmon ; but it might be well, now that the Tweed Commissioners and Mr. Mackenzie have raised the ques- tion, if experiments directed specially to this point were repeated with increased care and in greater number. There is, however, cousideral )le difiiculty in the way of obtaining conclusive evidence from experiments made on the fish after it has assumed its migratory habits, and 84 THE SALMON. can no longer be kept under inspection and protection. Of course the number of fisli marked can bear but a small proportion to the whole number of emigrants, or outward-bound ; the number of immigrants, or home- ward-boune killed by the rod as they can be by the net and leister. A fish on its redd will not take a lure, and lies in water where every angler knows it would be hopeless to cast a line. The fish taken by the rod in late seasons are taken in the same haunts, and in much the same condition, as those killed by the rod in the same reaches of the river during summer; that is, waiting and resting, in streams and deeps, on their way to the spawning-beds. So soon as they lie down to spawn, the angler's chances end, and the poaclier's cer- tainties begin. This rule or law of nature extends far beyond fish actually on the spawning-bed : just in proportion as a SA L]\I ON T.KG IST.ATION. 1 5 ?■, fish gets out of edible condition and into the spawning- condition, the more disinclined and unlikely is he to rise to a fly. This arises from two causes : the fish, carrying developed roe or milt, get heavy in body and lethargic in mind ; and as their condition implies some amount of residence in fresh water and experience of the wiles and cruelty of men, they have become afflicted with excessive caution, amounting, in truth, to contemptible cowardice. A river is often swarming for weeks with brown or gravid fish, whilst the angler toils day after day and catches nothing ; and every observant angler knows that, if he sees ten brown fish and one white or silvery one disporting themselves in a " cast," he has much more chance of enticing the single new-comer than any one of the ten old stagers. This fact is recognised in the popular name given to the discoloured fish in many dis- tricts both of Scotland and Ireland ; " old soldiers" they are significantly called, partly on account of the redness of their coats, but not less on account of their great skill in foraging, and otherwise taking care of themselves. Finally and chiefly, any additional number of fish killed by the legitimate rod-fisher, during the extended or extra portion of his season, does not anioimt to two or three per cent, of the number that his and his watchers' presence on the river saves from the poacher, who takes the worst- conditioned fish by the most destructive in- struments. It was, then, in 1857 that the first successful attempt at reform was made, and it w^as made in a, very mild form, l)y a Rill promoted by the majority of the Tweed 154 THE SALMON. Commissioners, l)ut the real promoter of wliicli was the Duke of Eoxbiirghe. It dealt partly and gently with the question of close-time, but its main object was the sup- pression of certain fixed engines called stell-nets, and also a less noxious species known as cairn-nets. For a long period previous to 1830, the close-time on the Tweed ran from the 10th October to the 10th of January; in 1830 its commencement was delayed till the 15th Octo- ber, with a fortnight more for rods ; and in 1836 it was continued till 15th February, with three weeks after the autumn close, i. e., till 7th November, for rods. The Bill of 1857 proposed that the fishing should not begin till the 1st of March instead of the 15 th of Februar}^, the close of the fishing season, or commencement of close- time, to remain as it was both for nets and rods ; while a section of the lower proprietors brought in an opposi- tion Bill, mainly designed to keep things as they w^ere, though also, hy way of threat, proposing to take au'ay from the upper proprietors the three weeks of rod- fishing they already possessed. At the close of the evidence before the Commons' Committee, the lower proprietors, either themselves con^dnced, or perceiving that the Com- mittee was convinced, withdrew this proposal, and even off'ered that rod-fishing should be legalized all the year round, and also that the nets should come off* a week earlier. But the mistake had been made ; the evidence as to the insufticiency of the close-time, not required for the purposes of the original Bill, but evoked by the pro- posals in the opposition Bill, had shown the Committee where the chief evil lay ; and, unasked and by a unani- mous vote, they resolved that a month should be cut SALMON LEGISLATION. 155 oft' from the end of the net-fishing season, and a fort- night from the beginning, so making the season run from 1st March to 14th September, and allowing rod-fishing till 14th October. In the Committee of the House of Lords, the time allowed for net-fishing was extended to the 1st October, being a fortnight longer than the period fixed by the Commons' Committee, though a fortnight shorter than the period by the then existing law which the promoters of the original Bill had not proposed to alter. By what ultimately proved a happy accident, their Lordships, in making this alteration on the Bill as it came from the Commons, omitted to make a corre- sponding alteration in the clause regarding rod-fishing, so that the result, as to the upper proprietors, of the Bill as it passed was, that they got only a fortnight of rod- fishing after withdrawal of the nets (from 1st to 14th October) instead of the three weeks they had possessed for twenty years before, the month which had been offered them by the House of Commons, or the three months which had been tossed to them, trop tard, by their tardily converted or frightened opponents. Although the Bill of 185 7 was not originally designed to make any altera- tion on the seasons, that question might in a manner have been considered settled had the Bill chanced to become law as it passed the Commons ; as it was, the question was, on the contrary, unsettled, and two years afterwards was brought up again, and then settled, if not in the best of all possible ways, at least in a way more satisfactory than had been previously hoped for. The Bill of 1859, promoted mainly by the Duke of Roxburghe, had for its chief object the earlier closing of !")(] 'J'HE SALMON. the fishing season ; and, after a long and costly contest in both Houses, the Tweed fishing season was fixed, for nets, from 15 th February to 14tli September, and for rods, from 1st February to 30th November. In explanation of what may seem the extraordinary or even inordinate extent of grace here given to rod-fishers, may be men- tioned the natural character and circumstances of the Tweed, and the virtual assent of what could scarcely, as to this particular point, be called the opposition party. The Tweed, even taking into account only the main river, is, as to the ground over which salmon range, a very long river, a hundred miles at least, and the salmon not only distribute themselves over it with great slow- ness as compared with most other rivers, so not arriv- ing at its upper reaches till late in the season, but also, for some reason not discoverable, obstinately disregard the angler s invitation to a little dalliance by the way, till they have ascended to distances from the sea which, on almost all other rivers, are found to be above the best angling districts. The difierence between the Tweed and other rivers in this respect, has been attempted to be explained by there being in other cases an estuary, through which the fish have passed before reaching the stream, whilst the Tweed tumbles at once as a river into the German Ocean ; but this explanation is not quite satisfactory, seeing that the habits of the Tweed fish do not difier much more from those of the fish of rivers like the Ness, which has an estuary, than from those of the fish of some rivers like the Spey, which have not. But though we cannot tell why it is, so it is, and Parliament made allowance accordingly. Further, SALMON LE(ilSLATIUN. 157 the lower pi-oprietorn, hoping to make powerful friends without cost or even with profit to themselves, made no serious opposition. And they have had their reward. Poaching has immensely diminished, and the productive- ness and value of the fisheries generally have greatly increased. The Tweed was benefited, and an example set wdiich other rivers have since adopted with improve- ments and extensions. The main object, however, of the Tweed Bill of 1857 was not to alter the close-time, Ijut to suppress an evil local in its pecuhar form, but existing elsewhere in other and worse forms ; and this object was proposed to be accomplished on a principle equally applicable to all similar cases. From time immemorial there had existed in the lower or tidal portions of the river Tweed a species . of engine called a stell-net, thus described in a paper read to the Newcastle antiquaries by the late Mr. Kobert Weddel of Berwick : — " The stell-net is rowed into the river in a semicircular shape. A rope attached to one end of it is held by the fisherman on shore, and to the other extremity is attached an anchor, which is fas- tened in the bed of the river. The fishermen in the boat then go to near the centre of the net on the outside of it, and take hold of it, and when they either feel fish strike against the net, or see them approach within its reach, they give notice to the men on shore, and while the latter haul in their end of the net, the men in the boat hoist the anchor, release the net, and bring it on shore.'' Obviously this engine largely partook of the nature of a fixture or "bar," remaining stationary across the path of the fish till a (iapture was made ; and, as in the case of 158 THE SALMON. all engines of that class, its evils lay not only in wliat it caught, but in what it stopped, doing even more indeed in the way of obstruction than of destruction. Never- theless, these engines had existed from time immemorial, and it was a strong measure to propose their abolition by means of a private Bill. It is true that the proposal was accompanied by another, assented to only by a majority of those concerned, and which, if the division into upper and lower proprietors had been complete as to interests, must have been reckoned as more than a quid pro quo. The middle and upper proprietors themselves possessed a species of fixed net, called a cairn-net. A cairn or putt is, or rather was, a short pier run out two or three yards into the river, and causing an eddy or " slack- water," into which fish travelling upwards are apt to enter and rest, especially during the nights when the river is in travelling condition ; and a cairn-net is or was a short net fastened to the outer end of this pro- jection, and then allowed to swing down with the stream, so forming a barrier parallel between the eddy and the main current, and having a good chance of intercepting all fish that turned to pass outward from theii' resting- place. Of these nets there were several hundreds upon the Tweed ; they were increasable to any extent ; and on many of the upper waters they killed a great many more fish than were taken with the rod. All this the middle and upper proprietors, or the majority of them, offered to give up ; in other words, to give up perhaps one-half of the fish they then killed. This proposal, of course, put two powerful arguments into the hands of the upper proprietors ; that they were applying to their own fixed SALMON LEGISLATION. 159 engines the same rules that they sought to apply to the much smaller number of fixed engines belonging to the lower proprietors, and that they showed their desire to be not to kill fish by all legal and available means, but only by one means, and that the least destructive of all. Rather unwisely, the lower proprietors as a body made common cause with those of their number who owned stell-nets, and the battle was fought on the general principle that these engines were sanctioned by imme- morial usage, recognised as property by law, included in family settlements, and therefore not subject to abolition without compensation, either by a private Bill, or by any kind of legislation. But the Legislature, merely on the ground that these engines were proved to be injurious to the general interest of the fisheries, and that they par- took of the nature of fixtures, which are adverse to the spirit of the salmon-fishery laws, entirely abolished them without compensation. There was of course a consider- able outcry, and the counsel for the stell-net owners announced that " the decision would be ruinous to some of his (dients, and absolutely fatal to some of the most important fisheries." But, apart from the argument as to justice, the result has quite refuted all such statements — the rental, not only of the Tweed, but of those portions where the stell-net existed, has very considerably in- creased since the abolition of the engines which were represented as constituting so large a portion of the value. It remains to be added, however, that this Parlia- mentary decision, taken with its sequels, or rather want of sequels, supplies a very striking instance of the want of consistency or fixed principles with which legislation, 160 THE SALMON. on at least this part of the question, has of late years been conducted. On the Tweed, those fixed engines had whatever claim or protection is derived from imme- morial usage, and were abolished by means of a private Bill ; a public and Government Bill, designed to abolish throughout Scotland fixed engines of quite modern date, and quite without legal recognition, was not accepted by Parliament ; and while the Tweed Bill of 1857 abolished ancient fixtures, the Tweed Bill of 1859 was not allowed to abolish in the same district certain other fisheries (stake and bag nets), which were and arc much more destructive than the stell-nets, and had not the pleas of usage and legal recognitio]]. Another change efiected by the new Tweed Acts, and subsequently imported into general Acts both for England and Scotland, was the prohibition of the use of the leister or spear. This was an old, and, especially on the Tweed, a very popular sport ; but it was butcherly and destructive, and by voluntarily surrender- ing it, the upper proprietors gave another proof that their object was not fish, but only fishing. Night- leistering, with the glare of the pine-torches reflected from clifi", and wood, and water, with the yells, the laughter, and the immersions, was doubtless in some respects a fine sight and a most exciting sport ; but it was slaughterous and wasteful, killing more fish in a few minutes than would have sufiiced for a season's sport, and killing them, too, just when they were most useful in the water and most useless out of it. It was no un- common thing, on some of the upper fisheries of the Tweed, to kill within an hour, on a February or Novem- SALMON LEGISLATION. IGl ber night, a greater number of fish than liad been killed with the rod during the whole season (and the farther up the river, the greater or more entire becomes this truth), to say nothing of the far greater numbers killed by poachers with the same weapon, both in and out of the legal season. The antiquity of the practice, its picturesqueness, and, at the same time, its odiousness to eyes unaccustomed to its beauties and natures unhar- dened to its butcherliness, are shown forth in these cranky sentences, written 200 years ago by the Crom- wellian Captain Francks : — " When the salmon goes to the shallows, that is the time the prejudicate native con- sults his opportunity to put in execution that barbarous practice of murdering fish by moonshine, or at other times to martyr them with the blaze of a wisp and a barbed spear. What ! are these cannibals or murdering moss-troopers to surprise fish by the engine of fire-light? Such dark conspirators sprung from Fawkes or Catiline, or some infernal incubus." The Rev. James Hall of London, in his Travels in Scotland by an Unusual Route, thus describes and comments upon the practice of salmon- leistering, as witnessed by him about the beginning of the present century, chiefly in Aberdeenshire, Banff", and Moray : — " There is a shamefully destructive amusement which the men are fond of, and which, though against the law, too many of the proprietors in the upper parts of the country do not discourage,^ — I mean the killing of salmon in the rivers in winter, while they are spawning. As by law the heritors near the mouths of rivers are en- titled to do all they can to prevent fish going up the rivers, so the proprietors on each side of the rivers, in L 162 THE SALMON. the upper parts of the country, though it is against the law, seem to wink at their tenants for destroying as many of them as they can, and preventing them from going down the river again ; and thousands of salmon are not only killed in the river Spey, in the Aven, and other rivers that run into it, but also, I believe, in most rivers in Scotland, particularly in the northern counties, by Avhat they call blazing or torch-light, and wliich they do in the following manner : — When it grows dark, at or near a shallow part of the river, where, during Novem- ber, December, and part of January, the fish are gener- ally busy in making a bed for spawn, four or five people meet, and having stripped the lower part of the body naked, and having a strong barbed hook (trident), witli a long handle, one carrying a large torch of lighted fir, split from the roots of trees found in the moss, they instantly rush into the water, where the fish are busy, and while the fishes know not what to do, astonished at the sudden light, many of them are killed with the long- barbed hooks. In many places of the Spey, this is generally repeated several times of an evening ; nay, sometimes, now and then, from four or five, when it grows dark, till daylight next morning ; as the fish that have escaped never fail, after some time, to return to their spawning again ; and, though there is not a doubt that fish in this state are not only what is termed foul, but also unwholesome, yet they are eaten, and often sold at a high price, sometimes even a shilling a pound ; and although to the delicate and luxurious it will appear a strange amusement, on a cold winter evening, to wade up to the neck in water and pieces of ire, yet certain it SALMON LEGISLATION. 163 is, that those who once begin this amusement generally grow fond of it, and that they seldom catch cold by it, but generally sleep sound, and find it a cure for the cold. It is true this is most frequently done by young men, but it is also true that men of fifty, sixty, and even seventy, sometimes practise it, and come for miles in the coldest evenings, even in the midst of frost and snow, not so much for the profit as the pleasure this amusement afibrds." The Tweed Bill of 1857, as introduced, proposed the abolition of leistering only during night, but Parliament extended the prohibition also to the day-time ; and the Act of 1859 rendered illegal even the possession of such a weapon within five miles of the river. It is also well worthy of note that the practice had been abolished by an Act of the Canadian Legislature, even in Labrador, before it was abolished among ourselves— the reason, as stated by Mr. Hind, being " the great waste of fish to which it led." In some minor, but still important respects, the Tweed Bills also set examples and gave hints to the framers of future and larger measures — such as by mak- ing the weekly close-time begin six hours before and last six hours after the twenty-four hours of Sunday ; by prohibiting the killing of foul fish even during the legal fishing season ; by restricting nets as to the size of the meshes (one and three-quarters inch from knot to knot) ; by fixing the closeness, both as to distance and time, with which ordinary or wear-shot nets may be worked ; by attempts towards modifying or removing the obstructions caused by dykes or dams, etc. etc. By 164 THE SALMON. what the Tweed Bills accomplished wholly or partially as to the Tweed, and also by what they unsuccessfully pro- posed, they gave the cue and the example to the other fishery districts, not only of Scotland, but of England and Ireland ; and it was afterwards found that the evidence by which they were supported had not only exposed the causes and suggested the remedies of the prevailing evils, but had imbued the Legislature both with knowledge and with grace. The district that first followed, and then, in one or two points, bettered the example of the Tweed, was the Tay, the proprietors of which, with something veiy near unanimity, asked and got in 1858 a local Act, virtually taking the Tay fisheries out of Home Drummond's Act, and cutting ofi' three weeks from the end of their season (making close-time begin on 26th August instead of 15th September), at the same time giving the rod-fishers to the 30th September, or five weeks' grace. For some years previous to this Act, as we have formerly had occasion to mention, a majority of the Tay proprietors had acted voluntarily on the rule of closing on the 26 th of August, with the efiect of raising their rental from the low point to which it had sunk under Home Drum- mond's Act ; but the new Bill had been rendered neces- sary by a few of the proprietors having refused to concur in the voluntary arrangement, and insisted on continuing to work their fisheries after their neighbours had closed. One eff"ect of the shortening of the season under the new Act was a further increase of rental, which has now reached a higher amount than ever before. And it may as well be noted here as elsewhere, that not only have SALMON LEGISLATION. 165 all those rivers which have shortened their season gained in the amount of produce, but that the expense of work- ing them has been largely decreased ; in other words, more fish are cauo-ht within a shorter time and at a smaller expense. In 1860, a year after the passing of the second Tweed Act, two private Bills were introduced, one for the Ness and Beauly, the other for the river Thurso, directed chiefly to sweeping away the fixed nets from the mouths and neighbourhoods of those rivers, though also closing the fishing season on the 26th of August, and alio wing; some time thereafter for rod-fishino;. Here the proposal was substantially, and the principle in- volved identically, the same as in the Tweed Bill of 1857— the putting down of fixed engines by the in- strumentality of private Bills ; the only differences in point of fact between the cases being that in this case the fixed engines were more numerous and destructive, besides being of modern date and disputed legality. After taking evidence, the Commons' Committee passed both the Bills ; but when they reached the Lords, it was successfully urged on the Government that the whole sulDJect of fixtures should be dealt with by a general measure, preceded by a general inquiry. A Committee of the House of Lords was then appointed, which, after hearing a great deal of evidence, made a report, of which the chief recommendations were : That all fixtures ought to be abolished, though adding that if that were found impossible, they ought to be restricted and regulated ; that there should be no fishing with nets later than the 20th. of August ; and that the Govern- 166 THE SALMON. ment ought to bring in a Bill applying these recom- mendations to Scotland generally. About the same time that this committee of the House of Lords was sitting on the case of Scotland, a Royal Commission was making its perambulations in an inquiry into the case of England ; and that Commission unanimously came to similar conclusions with the Lords' Committee in regard to the suppression of fixed engines, the lengthening of close-time, and all other matters of importance. Next year (1861), the Lord Advocate, in pursuance of the recommendation of the Lords' Committee, brought in a Bill for Scotland, aiming to carry into law all the propositions of the Committee, with the necessary sup- plements and adjuncts. All fixtures were to be sup- pressed ; the annual close-time was to extend from 21st August to 15th February, instead of from 15th of Sep- tember to 31st of January ; the weekly close- time was to be extended from twenty-four to thh-ty-eight hours ; and various other alterations were proposed, all in the right direction. This excellent measure, however, met a sad fate by an unusual process. In an evil hour, and per- haps because the sons of Zeruiah were too hard for him, the Lord Advocate consented to refer his Bill to a Select Committee of the House of Commons, the selection of which proceeded on a principle quite different from, or rather opposite to, that usually acted on in the appoint- ment of tribunals of that or any other species. The members were selected, not because they had any special knowledge of the matter, but because one or more of their constituents had special interests in the matter; SALMON LEdlSLATION. 167 and the tribunal thus strangely selected opened its door only once, to hear a single witness on one of the sides, and then sat down in private to tear the Bill to bits in such way as the strength of the different interests might permit. Apart altogether from any question as to the merits of the decision arrived at, this was surely a very anomalous and even irrational mode of procedure. Why should public money and the labours of commissions and committees be expended in ascertaining and decid- ing upon the facts of the question, if another tribunal, in no way qualified by knowledge, and somewhat disquali- fied by position, is afterwards to throw aside the facts, and reverse the decision ? What is the use of Committee A deciding according to evidence, if appeal lies to Com- mittee B deciding without evidence? The result was pretty much what was to have been expected — after much stumbling and blundering, the Committee, being unable to agree upon any other course, came to decisions which amounted to leaving fixed engines pretty much as they were. The little, indeed, that the Committee did propose to do on this subject was virtually a great concession, though nominally a restriction. One peculi- arity in the case of these engines had always been, that they were not sanctioned either specifically or in inten- tion by any charter, nor ever mentioned in any Act of Parliament, excepting to be prohibited. By the Bill, as altered by the Commons' Committee, they would have been mentioned in an Act of Parliament for the purpose of being dealt with on precisely the same footing as the ancient and anciently recognised engines ; and though the fixed-net owners, or rather claimants, might have 168 THE SALMON. temporarily lost a little by being subjected to the same new restrictions regarding times and seasons as the owners of the ordinary and ancient fisheries, they would have gained a hundred times more in being for the first time recognised as equal in rights to other fisheries by a Legislature which had never before recognised them as having any legal rights or existence at all. In a word, by the metamorphosis attempted by the Commons' Com- mittee, the Bill designed to suppress fixed nets in Scot- land would have been turned into the first legislative recognition or authorization of those devices. In these circumstances the Lord Advocate wisely resolved to withdraw the mangled and distorted remains. The chief blame of this failure lies not upon the Lord Advocate, who attempted excellently, but on the facts that he was strongly opposed and weakly befriended — that the fixed- net owners showed themselves united and energetic, and the river owners divided, apathetic, and captious. In 1862, the Lord Advocate tried again, and intro- duced a Bill which, after undergoing various alterations in its progress through Parliament, forms the existing law for all Scotch fisheries north of the Tweed. This Bill did a good deal in itself, and remitted a good deal to be done by Commissioners acting under the powers it gave them. It differed from its predecessors chiefly in omitting the main point, which had also proved the grand difficulty — it left the question of fixed engines almost untouched, and having to include them in the new restrictions imposed upon other engines, took care to declare that no mode of fishing should by the Act be made legal which was or miorht have been illeofal before ; O O o SALMON LEGISLATION. 169 in other words, left the question of fixed nets as open as before, for litigation as well as for legislation. A con- siderable power, however, was given to the Commis- sioners, the exercise of which is likely to result in the suppression of many of the most mischievous of these engines, the Commissioners being authorized to fix the natural boundaries between estuaries and seas ; that is, the boundaries between the localities in which fixed engines are undoubtedly illegal, and those in wliich their legality is assumed by some and questioned by others. There may be some doubt whether, as the chief use or significance of the distinction between sea and river has reference to fixed nets, this provision is not open to the objection of, so to speak, renewing or sharpening a dis- tinction which it is a most desirable object to obliterate. Perhaps, however, in all the circumstances, the omis- sion, as completely as possible, of the main question as to fixed nets was the best course for the Lord Advo- cate or the Government, as there were several other important matters urgently requiring adjustment, and the settlement of which could be effected without placing any additional obstacle in the way of a future decision upon the great question omitted. With these matters the new law has dealt, on the whole, wisely and well, and would have dealt still better and more wisely, had the Bill come out of Parliament as it went in. The annual close-time now extends to 168 days, and, if the Lord Advocate and the House of Commons had had their way, would have extended to 180 days. As the close-time for Scotland generally, under Home Drummond's Act, extended to only 139 days, there has thus been made an 170 THE SALMON. addition of 29 days, or about a month, to the period of re- pose or abstinence. This is a most valuable reform, and all the more so that the dates or days, though not the dura- tion, of the annual close-time, are allowed to be varied in different localities by the Commissioners, who are " to determine, subject to the provisions of this Act, at what dates the annual close-time for every district shall com- mence and terminate." This is a duty involving several difficulties, greatly increased by what we take leave to think the serious mistake of making the season the same length in every district. The difierence between districts is, for reasons previously stated, not so properly described by the phrases ' late' and ' early' as by the phrases ' long- seasoned ' and ' short-seasoned,' salmon beginning to get out of condition about the same time in all rivers, but vary- ing greatly as to the times in which they begin to ascend different rivers in good condition. The variations, there- fore, ought to be made at the commencement of the season ; but of course, when the law absolutely fixes the length of season, every variation as to the commencement would have a corresponding, or rather counteracting, effect upon the close. Power was also given to the Commissioners to decide for what period in each district rod-fishing shall be permitted after the withdrawal of the nets. The new close- times have not yet been fixed in all cases, owing partly to the owners of several rivers or dis- tricts having neglected to form Boards, as required by the Act, and partly to delays in procuring from the Home Office the necessary confirmations. So far, however, as the Commissioners have been enabled to proceed, they have divided the rivers or districts into three different SALMON LEGISLATION. 171 classes, as regards the periods for net-fishing : — 1st class — open from 11th February to 26th August; 2d class — from 16th February to 31st August; 3d class — from 25th February to 9 th September. In the first class there have been or are likely to be placed by far the larger number of rivers, including almost all the important ones — Tay, Forth, Dee and Don, Spey, Findhorn, Kyle of Sutherland, Ness, Beauly, etc. In the second class there will probably be no other rivers than the two Esks of Forfarshire, and the Add and Echaig, in Argyleshire. The third class will include the small rivers in Gallo- way and the south of Ayrshire, and also the Ythan and Ugie, in Aberdeenshire. As to rod-fishing, the Commis- sioners seem to proceed on the plan of allowing it to continue up to the end of October, unless the proprietors desire an earlier closing. At the end of the volume will be found a table, giving more precisely the close-times of the Scotch rivers north of Tweed, as fixed at May 1864. The Act also extended the weekly close-time by twelve additional hours, making it run from six on Saturday night to six on Monday morning. Here, too, a discre- tionary power, and one of a rather embarrassing charac- ter, is given to the Commissioners : " The Commissioners shall have power, on the application of the district board, or of any two proprietors of fisheries in any district, to vary the period at which the weekly close-time shall commence in any district, or any part thereof, in so far as they may think reasonable or expedient, provided that such weekly close-time shall in no case be less than thirty-six hours." Why have mentioned certain hours 172 THE SALMON. if the Commissioners were left free to fix any other hours ? In every district the Commissioners will doubt- less have it represented to them that some fisheries would be greatly benefited by the thirty-six hours being made to begin at noon on Saturday and terminate at midnight of Sunday, thus giving them the advantage of the dark hours of Monday morning. But just as certainly they will find that the arrangement which benefits those fisheries will proportionally injure others in the same district. On what principle are the Commissioners to decide, and on what principle were they asked to decide at all ? What the Commissioners have done so far is to refuse, in the case of river or net-and-coble fishings, any variation of the hours from six to six ; but in the case of stake and fly nets (not of bag-nets, which can be reached at all states of the tide), the weekly close-time, if the proprietors so desire, has been made to run from the hour of low-water nearest six on Saturday night to the hour of low-water nearest six on Monday morning. The Act also efiects several other beneficial changes. It prohibits fishing with lights, but, obviously by acci- dent, omits to prohibit the use of the leister also during the day, as do the English and Tweed Acts. It prohibits the sale and use of salmon roe, which had formed a large portion of the remuneration of the poachers, and renders illegal fishing by three or more persons at night a criminal ofl*ence. In short, the new Scotch law deals more or less satisfactorily with all the parts of the question, except the great evil and difficulty of fixed engines, and that difficulty will now be the more easily dealt with when SALMON LEGISLATION. l73 its consideration is (.liaembarrassed from its siuTouiidings, and is left standing alone, all its ugly companions abo- lished and gone. All parties interested, and the public more than any party, are under no light debt to the Lord Advocate for pulling through, amid so many difiiculties, and the distracting clamour of conflicting interests, the only general Salmon Fishery Act for Scotland which had been passed for more than thirty years, though during that period there had been pretty nearly thirty attempts. For England, a very important Act was passed in the same year (1861) that the first Bill for Scotland was defeated, the better and earlier success of the attempt for England being ascribable mainly to the fact of the evils in that country having become greater and more obvious. Indeed, matters in England had arrived at such a stasje that leojislation had to be directed rather to restoration than preservation. Accordingly, a large portion of the English Act refers to the removal or modification of the evils caused by pollutions and ob- structions. The substance of the clauses as to pollution is simply the prohibition of "putting into any waters containing salmon any liquid or solid matter to such an extent as to cause the waters to poison or kill fish," un- less the ofliender can show that he has "used the best practicable means within a reasonable cost to render harmless the said liquid or solid matter." The pro- visions as to the removal or lessening of obstructions, and also as to the regulation of " fishing rivers," are too numerous, various, and minute to be here stated. The annual close-time is fixed to extend from the 1st Sep- tember to the 1st February, being 153 days, or fifteen 174 THE SALMON. days less than the Scotch close-time ; but the Quarter Sessions and Home Office have power to " extend or vary" the close-time, — an expression which seems of very dubious interpretation. Two extra months — till 1st November —are given for rod-fishing. The weekly close-time is from twelve at noon on Saturday to six on Monday morning, being six hours more than given by the new Scotch law. The minimum size of the meshes of nets is fixed at two inches from knot to knot, or eight inches round. . All fixed engines are pronounced illegal, wherever placed, with the exception of " fishing weirs and fishing mill-dams," and of " any ancient right or mode of fishing as lawfully exercised at time of the passing of this Act, by any person, in virtue of any grant or charter, or immemorial usage." There has not yet been time to see to what extent these provisions will abet the evil of fixed engines ; but this much is certain, an end is made in England of stake and bag nets, none of which were sanctioned by grant nor by immemorial usage. Not the least of the benefits of the English Act of 1861, is that it gives comparative simplicity and uniformity to the Salmon Laws of England, which for- merly were in unworkable confusion. The new Act repealed, so far as relates to salmon, no fewer than thirty-three old Acts, of which twenty-six were general and seven private. Though the present, therefore, is not the best of all possible laws, it is one good law coming in place of many bad or useless laws. In Ireland, up till 1842, the fishery laws had been for centuries the same as those of England, though modified and somewhat confused by differences in the SALMON LEGISLATION. 175 nature of property tenures. Excepting as to the ques- tion of fixed engines, it is not necessary now and here to refer to anything beyond the main provisions of the existing law, which passed in 1862. The annual close- time, which had previously been 124 days, with varying dates, is now 168 days, as in Scotland, with dates vary- ing in different districts at the will of the Commissioners, and angling is permitted for the whole period from 1st February to 1st November. The weekly close-time extends from six on Saturday morning to six on Mon- day morning, being twelve hours more than the Scotch weekly close-time, and six hours more than the English. In minor matters the provisions of the existing Irish law do not differ materially from the English and Scotch laws. Regarding fixed engines, both the history and the present state of the Irish laws are too complicated to admit of more than an imperfect description. In Ireland, as everywhere else, stake and bag nets were innovations upon the old methods, introduced at comparatively re- cent dates ; and, though there were judicial decisions holding them illegal both at statute and common law, the practical questions as to their removal were greatly encumbered by the varieties and dubieties of the tenures on which fisheries were held. In 1842, an Act was got through Parliament, partaking, at least in appearance, of the nature of a compromise, sanctioning a few of the existing fixtures, and these only. It is or was com- plained, however, that, besides in these few cases making legal what had been illegal, this Act, by an indirect process, gave a quasi legality to almost all the fixtures, the imperfections of the law being greatly aggravated by 176 THE SALMON. the neglect and malversation of the Magistracy. That the operation of the Act of 1842, on this point, was evil, may be inferred from the fact, that, after great grumbling and contention, its provisions as to fixtures were to a great extent repealed by the Act of 1862. By that Act, bag-nets are prohibited within any river, as defined by the Commissioners, or within three miles of the mouth of any river, as so defined, with the exception of cases in which the right of salmon fishing in the whole of a river and its tributaries and lakes belongs to one proprietor. No neiv fixed nets can be erected anywhere. The Commissioners can order the removal of all fixed nets that are in their opinion injurious to navigation, or otherwise illegal. No cruive or trap can be used within fifty yards of a mill-dam, unless the dam has a fish-pass approved of by the Commissioners ; and nothing in the Act is to render legal any fixed net or fishing weir in contravention of any previous Act of Parliament, or of the common law in force in Ireland. Though the prin- ciple of the Irish Act, therefore, is not the suppression of all fixtures as necessarily and in their nature evils and encroachments, it deals with them as things which the law must jealously watch and tightly restrict ; and it would appear that the Act is interpreted and worked by the Commissioners in such a way that, as to Ireland, the mischief may be regarded as not only stayed, but reduced to comparative unimportance. In 1863, a very useful little Bill was brought in by Government, and passed without resistance, " prohibiting the exportation of salmon at certain times." The evil which this measure was designed to cure, and in the SALMON LEGISLATION. 177 r-ure of which it lias already made considerable progress, was exhibited by returns to Parliament, showing the declared value of the salmon exported in each of the months of the years 1861 and 1862. The year may, as to salmon, be divided into two equal parts, one during which the fisheries are legally in operation, and the fish in good edible condition, and the other during which fishing and sale are illegal, the fish unwholesome, and their capture destructive of the breed. It appears from the returns, that, measured by value, just about as much salmon was wont to be exported during the illegal as during the legal season ; and as the value of foul fish as compared with clean is seldom more than one-fifth, it would ap- pear that by far the greater part of the salmon exported consisted of fish taken in the breeding season, and in the most unwholesome condition, besides having been stolen from the fishery-owners, and in violation of laws designed to preserve from extinction a valuable article of food. In 1862, the value of the salmon exported was £41,657, and of that value almost precisely a half was exported during those months when there was no legal fishing, and each of four of the close months showed a much larger export than each of four of the other months. In. fact, as soon as the period of the year arrived at which fishing becomes legal, the export of salmon dwindled to a trifle, — several thousand pounds' worth being sent abroad in the last month of the close-time, and only a few hundreds in the first months of the open season. The evidence was complete, that the export trade in salmon was in the main a trade in stolen and unwhole- some commodities. The mode of cure was obvious. M 178 THE SALMON. The sale of salmon was prohibited during the months in which the fisheries are legally closed ; prohibit the ex- port also. To preserve the fisheries, we had made laws against selling stolen and unwholesome fish among our- selves ; to allow the sale of the same commodity to our neighbours, was not only an inconsistency, but was an injustice both to our neighbours and ourselves. The e^dl, too, w^as increasing, the export of 1862 having been nearly double that of 1861. On the recommendation of the Customs department, the Government introduced a Bill, now law, prohibiting the export of unclean or un- wholesome salmon at all times, and of "any salmon caught during the time at which the sale of salmon is prohibited in the district where it has been caught ;" the burden of proving that the salmon entered for exporta- tion are not so entered in contravention of the Act being laid upon the exporter. The eff'ect of this Act, in co-operation with the clause in the other Acts prohibit- ing the sale and use of salmon roe, has been very bene- ficial ; and, although a considerable quantity of foul salmon is still smuggled to the Paris market under false entries, the Customs will doubtless fall upon some method of stopping that evil and punishing the evil-doers. From this necessarily brief, rough, and imperfect sketch, it will be seen that, as to one of the two chief questions regarding salmon -fisheries — i.e., the length of the season — the recent legislation for all the three countries has tended in the same direction, and has gone, in all the cases, pretty nearly the same length. The annual close-time and the weekly close-time have both been lengthened as to the commercial modes of SALMON LEGISLATION. 170 fishing, and there has been an extension of privilege, or rather of right, to those upper proprietors whose wishes are satisfied by obtaining only a very small proportion of the fish all of which are born and bred within their realms. But the other great question — whether certain modes of fishing, prohibited to the more ancient and important fisheries, are justly or even legally per- mitted to the newer fisheries — though it has been brought pretty near to a satisfactory settlement in England and Ireland, has in Scotland been left over for separate con- sideration and handling. The removal of fixed engines is not the only thing left to be done for the Scotch fish- eries, but it forms the most important and urgent part of the remaining work ; and therefore it is necessary to inquire more particularly what these engines are, and why they are, whence they came and where they are .going to, what they have done and what ought to be done to them. 1 Sn THE SALMON. CHAPTER V. FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. Scotch Fixed Nets — Pollution of TJivers. " Clear your mind of cant," is an injunction much needed to be addressed to the pubHc and the Legislature regarding the question of fixture-fisheries on the coasts of Scotland. The public mind, which of course the legis- lative mind reflects, has become infected with the idea that these engines are a "property" which it would be robbery to take away ; but the fact, easy of demonstra- tion, is, that the so-called property is in truth stolen goods, or rather the means of stealing goods that had for centuries been the lawful -property of others. If that portion of the value of any fishery which is derived from the use of those engines can in any sense be called property, it is a pi'operty unjustly or violently carved out of other property — a new property sliced off from an old property by instruments which the old property is not allowed to use for its benefit or defence. In Scotland all property in salmon-fisheries is consti- tuted by or derived from Crown grants. Now the sum of the whole matter as to fixed nets is condensed in this little fact— that the Crown never made a grant of salmon- fisheries with the intention or under the slightest sus- FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 181 picion that tlie fishing was to be performed by fixed nets. All the charters for sea-coast fisheries were granted, and all those fisheries were worked, long before those engines were resorted to or thouoht of. It is therefore not an inference, but a simple matter of fact, that, if the owners of sea-coast fisheries were now compelled to recur to the machinery which they used at first, and which is the only kind permitted to their neighbours still, they would have left to them all that it was ever intended they should have, and all that they ever had, till, within these few years, they, at their own hand, seized what had from ancient times belonged to others. The question is not whether the sea-shore proprie- tors holding fishing charters shall retain their right of salmon-fishing, but whether they, and they alone, shall be allowed to fish by any and every means they can devise ; more especially, whether they are to be allowed to use a species of engines not contemplated when they acquired their right of fishing, not used by them till a very recent period, and strictly prohibited to all their neighbours. It is not a question of taking away any "right," but of applying the same regulation to the same right at one spot as is applied to it at another round the corner. It is not a question of taking away any portion of any kind of " property," but of bringing all portions of the same kind of property under the same law. The assertion that these nets are " legal," is question- able as fact, and worthless as argument. Their legality is not judicially decided ; if they are legal, it is l)y over- sight, or rather want of foresight ; and though they were entirely and unquestionably legal, they would still be in 182 THE SALMON. no stronger position as to legality, and in a much weaker one as to consuetudinary use, than many of the modes of fishing wliich the fishery laws have suppressed from time to time throughout several centuries. The judicial decision on the point of legality went only this length — that the river or upper proprietors had not a sufficient title to sue, that title being only in the Crown as grantor. No action at law has been raised by the Crown, and consequently it has not been really decided whether the law would support these engines against a plea by the grantor, that the grant had been abused or exceeded. It is almost necessary, however, to presume, from the fact of the Crown never having raised such an action, that its law-advisers have been of opinion that the law as it stands is not sufficient to reach these engines. But, assuming that, how is it that the law happens so to stand ? Simply by accidental omission, or rather by the evil not having been in existence or contemj)lation when the laws were made ; in short, from the laws being old and the engines new. From the earhest period, as already mentioned, legislation was directed to prevent the erection of any standing obstruc- tion, or even of any object the sight of which might deter, in or across " the run of the fish." Until quite lately, it was not known that the fish had a " run" along the sea-coast, almost as definite, and, generally speaking, no broader, than their run within the estuaries and larger rivers ; consequently the words as to fixtures used in the Acts had reference only to rivers and estuaries — that is, to the only places where fixtures had existed or were thought possible. And even after it was discovered that FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 183 salmon could be caught in the sea, and not merely in the rivers and estuaries, and when fisheries on the shores of the sea began to be asked for and granted (which was about two centuries and a half ago, the earliest charter for a sea-shore salmon-fishery which has been obtained, being of date 1603), no question arose about fixtures on the sea-shore, because the fixed engines then known were not applicable to those localities, and it Avas not till two hundred years afterwards, or till our own days, that any engines were devised capable of standing and operating on the open coast. If therefore these engines are legal, it is only because they are not named nor specially struck at in any Act passed before they existed ; and it is only through accidental omission that the Statute-law did not long ago deal with them in terms of express prohibition. But does the past history of salmon legislation, any more than do the dictates of common sense, sanction the principle that whatever is must always be ? On the contrary, that history shows that, especially in re- gard to fixtures, legislation suppressed from time to time whatever devices were deemed unfair or injuri- ous, without regard to the sanction they had received either from law or antiquity. Up to the middle of the fifteenth century, it would appear that fixed engines, of which the only species then known were cruives and yairs, were legal everywhere. They were then sup- pressed in estuaries and " within flude-marke of the sea" — a cruive working in the full run of the fresh river under certain regulations being regarded as less mischiev- ous. These prohibitions were imposed at first only for a specified term of years, but afterwards in perpetuity, 184 THE .SALMON. and tlie Acts expressly iiicluded in their proliibitions even those engines for which the Crown had granted special permission ; that is, permission not only to fish, but to fish by that particular mode. Thus in an Act of James l. (1424), it is " ordanyt that all crufis and yaris set in fresche watteris, quhar the see fillis and ebbis, the quhilke destroyis the fry of all fisches, be destroyit and put away for thre zeris to cum, notgaynstandand [not- withstanding] ony privileges or fredom geifyn in the contrare." In the same reign, another Act (1477 or 1478) runs thus : — " It is statute and ordained that the acta maid of before be King James the First anent the cruves sett in waters be observed and keiped, the quhilk beiris in effect that all cruves set in waters quhair the sea fillis and ebbis, the quilk destroyis the fry of all fisches, be put away and destroyed for ever mair, notwithstanding all freedome or priviledge given in the contrail'." Ten years afterwards, it is " statut and ordand that all cruffis and fisch-dammys that ar within salt waterys quhar the sey ebbis and flowis be alutly destroyit and put done, alswele thai belongis to our Soveraine Lord as utheris through aU the realme." And in another Act, referring both to cruives in the localities above specified, and to cruives in positions up the rivers, where they were legal, but in the working of which the requirements of the law had not been obeyed, " all schireffes, baillies, and stew- ards" are ordered " to destroy, cast-doune, and put away all the said cruives within their bounds incontinent with- out ony delay." Here Ave see that modes of fishing which had been prosecuted from time immemorial, and prose- cuted under Crown rights for the exercise of those modes. FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 185 were suppressed by statute, the suppression including the fisheries not only of private persons, but also the fisheries retained and worked by the Crown itself. Those Acts were dealing with the only kind of fixtures then known, and they made no scruple of suppressing them in all positions where they were considered hurtful to the lireed of fish and " the commoun weill." Yet at the present day we are told that it would be monstrous to legislate to the same effect regarding modes introduced, so to speak, only yesterday, and which are exercised, not only without special rights conferred by the Crown, but under rights conferred with a view to the use of quite different modes. The salmon-fisheries of Scotland may, as to the present question, be looked at as consisting of two divisions : in one division wc have the great majo- rity of the fisheries in number and value, situated in rivei's and estuaries, and Avhich have existed from time immemorial ; and in the other division we have a very much smaller number and value of fisheries, situated on the sea-shores, which came into existence centuries later than the others, and acquired any considerable value only within the present generation. The former were, five hundred years ago, subjected to certain restrictions, which it is said it would be robbery to apply to the latter even now. Of course, when the question is one of legislation, and not of litigation, to talk of, " prescription," as many do, is no better than nonsense. The modes of fishing suppressed by the old Statutes just cited, and various other practices suppressed by various other Statutes, had incomparably longer prescription than the engines now 186 THE SALMON. in question. " Forty years," is the present cry of the owners of sea-shore fixtures ; but the owners of river and estuary fisheries, when it was long ago and often pro- posed to do to them what it is now proposed to do to the coast-fishers, miglit have cried " Ten times forty years," and could have pointed to charters and laws ex- pressly giving them what the law afterwards took away from them ; while the owners of sea-shore fisheries can- not show any charter in which their engines are autho- rized or mentioned, or any law in which they are men- tioned, except to be prohibited. Even as matter of fact, the statement that these nets have existed on the sea- shore for more than forty years is not true, except to a very limited extent ; it is only two or three of the earliest of them that can boast that degree of antiquity. It may be desirable to explain, in passing, that in denying to stake and bag nets the antiquity even of forty years, we are putting out of view the district of the Solway. For that exclusion there are several good rea- sons— such as, that the Solway was never under the general Scotch law, but had nominally a law, and practi- cally a lawlessness of its own ; and that the Solway is an estuary, whereas we have been speaking of the period of the erection of fixed engines upon the shore of the sea. The Solway, in fact, was not only not under the protection of either Scotch or English law, but was spe- cially and designedly left unprotected. The reason for this, on the Scotch side, was candidly stated in an Act passed at the time of the union of the Crowns : " Ijecause the rivers at that tyme devyded at many points the bounds of England and Scotland, whereby the forl:)ear- FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 187 ance upon the Scots part from the shiiighter of salmon in forbidden tyme, and of kipper, smolts, and black fishe at all times, would not have made salmond ony mair to abound in these waters gif the lyke order had not bene observed upon the English side." Hence it was that fixed engines, other than cruives and yairs, were of earlier date on the Solway than elsewhere ; and hence, too, those allusions in Scott's Redgaimtlet to the existence of fixed nets in that region about 1750, which have given rise to great misconceptions regarding the date of the engines which are now ordinarily understood when we speak of fixed nets. It was not till 1788, or nearly forty years after the period of which Scott wrote, that anything like the present stake-net was devised, even with the design of operating in the shallow and sheltered waters of the Solway estuary. The nets that had existed in the Solway previous to that date, though of the nature of fixtures, were not similar to nor fitted to do the work of the sea-shore engines which, within these few years, have so greatly injured the general interests of the salmon fisheries, nor indeed were they fitted for any other tidal waters than those of the Solway Firth, which have great peculiarities, such as wideness, shallowness, and disco- loration. The ancient Solway nets were of three kinds. One kind, called " the half-net," was similar to the an- cient stell-net of the Tweed, previously described, the chief difierence being that the outer end of the net was held, not by an anchor, but by a man, who stood as deep and as long as he could in the advancing tide, and brought his end of the net ashore as soon as a fish struck. A second kind, called " the poke- 188 THE SALMON. net," was set slack between two poles in some of those parts of tlie sands across wliicli fish were likely to take their course, and so captured the fish by entanglement. The third species, called " the raise-net," was also fixed between poles or stakes, but rose from the bottom with the rising tide, so letting the fish pass upwards into the " lakes" or flats at the lower part of which these engines were erected, and then fell with the ebbing tide, so en- closing the fish, and capturing such of them as sought to return downwards. It was apparently this last kind of net to which Scott, in Redgauntlet, makes the Quaker Geddes allude : " Nets which work by the ebb and flow of the tide." It will be seen that all these three kinds of nets were fitted only for the peculiar circumstances of the Solway, where there are ffir-stretching flats, a strong tide, and a loose sand, which, raised by the rush of the tide, discolours the water, so as to prevent the fish seeing the obstruction. They differed entirely from what we now call the stake-net, which puts across the path of the lish an impassable wall, terminating in a labyrinth or trap, where entrance is easy, and exit impossiljle. The great difference indeed between these old Solway fixtures and the new species is sufficiently proved by what hap- pened when what may be called the real stake-net was introduced into those regions. It was introduced at a fishery near Annan in 1788 ; and, as we have already had occasion to mention, in a few years it had almost eaten up all its neighbours, and soon after was eaten up itself. The same device was then resorted to in the Firth of Tay ; but that district being under the Scotch law, and being judicially declared an estuary, the attempt FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 189 was suppressed. It was only after all this that the kinds of nets now under question were set up at the places where they now abound. The year 1821 was the date w^hen the first stake-net was erected on the shore of the sea. The place was Dunninald in Forfarshire ; the rent — so entirely novel was the experiment — was at first every fifth fish, but at the end of three years was made £400 in money ; and the man who did the deed is still alive, and (strange to say) happy. But, though the facts as to the real age of the engines now in dispute were otherwise, it would be monstrous to infer that what has existed for forty years has thereby acquired a right to exist throughout all ages, especially when it is plain as day that the" whole scope and prin- ciple of the fishery laws, extending over centuries, has been to restrain or suppress whatever was found to be inequitable or injurious, without regard to the date or circumstances of its introduction. " Prescription," there- fore, must go out of the controversy as an impostor and interloper. Neither is it of any avail to say that those sea-shore fisheries cannot be fished by any mode but the newly- devised one ; because, in the first place, it is not and cannot be true ; and in the second place, because if it were true, it would be nothing to the purpose, seeing that the same plea might be raised for large stretches of river as well as of shore, and that it is just saying that the sea-shore fisheries have not any value but that which consists of value taken from their neighbours, by means which their neighbours are denied. All the charters were granted, and all the fisheries fished, long before the modes 190 THE SALMON. of fishing now in question were used or invented ; so that the property was not granted or acquired with any view to its present uses, and it must have been found capable of those other uses to which it is now proposed to revert. The oldest coast charter is dated 1603, the latest 1819 ; only four such charters have been granted within the present century ; and the latest was not, any more than the earliest, granted under any idea that fixed nets would be used. Also it is worth men- tion in passing, that the coast fishery which got its charter last before the time when fixed nets were intro- duced, has now been fished out of existence by the com- petition of more favourably situated neighbours. The very fact of a sea-shore salmon-fishery having a charter is evidence that that fishery can be, and that it has been, fished by the ordinary process of net and coble, or by processes other than fixed nets. If that fishery had not been so fishable, it would not have been a fishery at all, till within these few years, and therefore would not have been granted, purchased, or fished, as those fisheries were, for generations preceding. In a " Statement for the Pro- prietors in Scotland who hold Crown grants of Salmon Fisheries in the Sea," laid before Parliament in 1861, it was said : — " It is impossible to fish with profit in the sea in Scotland except with fixed nets ; " and again : "The suppression of every kind of fixed nets is a prac- tical destruction and confiscation of the rights of those who possess Crown grants of salmon-fishing in the sea ; and sea-coast proprietors would be deprived by the Bill of every available mode of fishing." Every man who said this, or had it said on his behalf, had acquired his rights FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 1 9 I long before, and without reference to, the introduction of those engines which it was proposed to suppress ; had found other means of fishing available ; and would have had nothing confiscated that it was ever intended he should possess, or that his ancestors ever had possessed. But suppose there were or could be portions of the char- tered shore-fisheries not capable of being fished otherwise than by fixed engines, it is equally true that there are great portions of rivers and estuaries in precisely the same position. Take the Tay for instance. Under a well-known decision of the Courts of Law, defining the boundaries of the " estuary," within which the old Acts were applicable, several estates lost rentals of thousands a year by fixed engines being prohibited, and no other being effective at these spots. It is ridiculously untrue that of fisheries in rivers which but for the law would be fished with fixed engines, all are or can be fished other- wise. On every river and estuary there are whole tracts now valueless as fisheries that would become great pro- perties but for that principle on which all existing laws are based, and yet which is now denounced as a novelty and confiscation. If to subject this new and hitherto favoured class of salmon-fishers to the same restrictions as their neighbours, would render their fisheries almost valueless, that is just saying that their property is naturally and proj)erly of very little value, and is no evidence at all that they are entitled to make it valuable at the cost of their neighbours, and by means in the use of which their neighbours are not allowed to compete. It is surely a fair presumption that the Crown did not contemplate giving a man a fishery at one point, im- 192 THE SALMON. posing very severe restrictions upon him, and then that another man round the corner, where perhaps there is not very mucli difference naturally, though one is called the estuary and the other the sea-shore, should be allowed to put up engines which the other was prevented from using, to the injury and almost to the anniliilation, as it has proved, of the older grants. The gift was accepted and for centuries used under this presumption or fact, and if the recipients lost anything by being put on the same footing with their neighbours, it would not be a property they had got from the Crown, l)ut one they had taken in spite of the intention of the Crown and the spirit of the law. The public or parliamentary mind has not sufficiently in view that all that value which the fixed-net fisheries have had added to their original value by the use of these engines has been so much and more subtracted from the value of other and older fisheries. The fixed net fisheries, we are told, axe properties that have been bought and sold, produce large rents, and involve the interests of widows and children. But when and out of what have these properties been created ? And are there no " widows and children" but those of the owners of bag-nets ? Those properties — i.e., so much of them as is dependent on the use of fixed engines — have been created within comparatively a few years, and at the cost of other and older proprietors. All has been sub- tracted from the river proprietors to whom is denied the use of the very modes that have impoverished them. There are or were some valuable fixed-net fisheries created within twenty years on the coasts of Ayrshire ; FUTUllE SALMON LEGlSLATiOX. 193 but they were carved out of the river-fisheries, which were " confiscated" to the extent of about three-fourtlis. Fixed-net fisheries to the value of several thousands a year liave been created on the coast of Aberdeenshire ; but w^iilst that process has been going on upon the coasts, the annual value of the produce in the two Aberdeen- shire rivers has been reduced by nearly £18,000 a year! Of the fisheries on the Con on, nine-tenths were trans- ferred in two or three years to a stake-net erected in the Cromarty Firth. About three-fourths of the value of the ancient fisheries on the Ness and Beauly, includ- ing about nine-tenths of the value of the fisheries be- longing to the Corporation of Inverness, were transferred in the course of a few years to the proprietors of the sea-coast down the firth, using engines which the law prohibited to the proprietors farther up, and had been designed to prohibit everywhere. In the Solway, as we have seen, one stake-net, the first of its kind, almost en- tirely swallowed up the neighbouring fisheries, swelled itself up to more than a hundred times its former and natural size — and then burst, the whole value of the coast fisheries in that district, now fished by stake and bag nets, being at present about a tenth of what it was when salmon were cheap, and these inventions not found out. In the view of such facts it is scarcely prudent to talk of confiscation and transference. Besides what they take fromi the older and rightful properties, those engines take a great deal from the public, and do not proportionally benefit those who claim them as property. It is their nature to operate in deterring and obstructing as well as in capturing, and N 194 THE SALMON. tliey so operate in a more injurious way than the simihir causes operating in rivers. When salmon are stopped or frightened back within a river, it is, generally speaking, only a matter of delay and return ; but in the sea, the fish stopped by the standing nets, if they escape capture, are driven out among their natural enemies the seals and porpoises, who systematically wait outside for the chance. Again, though affording less employment than the ordi- nary nets, fixed nets are very costly to work, owing to the great tear and wear of materials caused by the action of the sea. Taking the average of known cases, it re- quires at least three fish to be taken in these engines for one taken l^y the ordinary methods, in order to produce the same amount of rental or profit. One highly expe- rienced lessee of salmon-fisheries stated before the Lords' Committee that one small fixed-net fishery in his neigh- bourhood, in order to the payment of a £12 rent, required to kill a greater number of fish than he, fishing within the river, required in order to the payment of a £650 rent. Partly in further explanation of such results, and partly as exhibiting another evil, it may be men- tioned that those nets, standing on the open coast, can seldom fish during those earlier months of the year when fish are in the highest condition and greatest demand. In what has been said here, the reference has been almost entirely to fixed nets on the sea-shore or any- where else, not to cruives on the rivers. Legally and morally, cruives differ from stake and bag nets chiefly in this, that the right to fish by cruives was spe- cially granted by charter, and has always been recog- nised by law. Practically, there is also this difference, FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 19 5 that, cruives, besides being few, cannot be increased either in number or efficiency, as no new charter author- izing them where they do not now exist could be ob- tained, and as the law tightly regulates their mode of working ; while fixed nets are capable of great extension, both as to number and as to length or reach. For in- stance, a plan has lately been adopted by which, after a stake-net has been carried out as far seaward as the depth of the water or the nature of the ground will permit, bag-nets (that is, nets of the same kind as the others, Ijut fixed Ijy anchors instead of stakes) are placed at the outer end in continuation, the whole some- times being a mile in length, and not only forming a barrier across more than the whole of " the run of the fish," but also capturing many of that proportion of the fish which, after striking the leader in-shore, do not go into the trap of the stake-net, and would, but for the bag -net beyond, escape for the time. Indeed, engines of this kind being as yet but in their infancy in more senses than one, it is impossible to foresee to what lengths or into what new shapes they may grow; while cruives can- not be, as they have not for centuries been, increased either in number or efficiency, but on the contrary can be, as they have been, greatly reduced, both as to their obstructive and their destructive efiects. Nevertheless, cruives are evils and excrescences, and their owners would be great gainers by conceding, as all but two or three of them are understood to be willing to do, that they should be included in a measure al)olishing all fixture fisheries, without distinction of sea or river, box or net. 196 THE SALMON. Besides all tlie facts and arguments against fixed nets, there is the important if not conclusive considera- tion, that, speaking as to legislation, the question is really res judicata. It has been before many tribunals, and all, after hearing evidence, have come to the same decision. Time after time, Royal Commissions and Committees of both Houses of Parliament have con- demned the existing system, and handed it over to the Government and the law for execution. That sentence has already been carried out for England, and is in pro- cess of being carried out for Ireland ; and it is anomalous, as well as unreasonable and unjust, that when all are under the same condemnation, the system should be brought to execution as to England and Ireland, and reprieved as to Scotland, where its earliest and its greatest offences have been committed. The exceeding anomalousness of this surely temporary state of things is illustrated very curiously, if rather in caricature, by the fact, that certain fixed nets are suppressed in Scot- land (after 1st January next) by the late Scotch Act, and that these are the only nets of the kind, in Scotland or elsewhere, which possessed the claim or excuse of something like antiquity. The more immediate reason for making the shores of the Solway Firth an exception to the rest of Scotland is, that the proprietors on the Eng- lish shore very justly and naturally insisted that, as the nets on the two sides of the firth, though on one side they stand in Scotland, and on the other in England, virtually captured the same broods of fish, they should be subject to the same laws of fishing. In further illus- tration of the anomalous and untenal^le condition of FUTUPvE SALMON LEGISLATION. 197 things presently existing, there is the curious contrast to the case of the Solway supplied by the case of the Tweed, the mouth of which river may be regarded as holding, on the east side of the island, the position cor- responding to that which the Solway Firth holds on the west. Wliilst on the Solway the new English law as to fixtures is carried across into Scotland, on the Tweed the Scottish law or want of law on the same subject, is carried across into England — certain very destructive fixed engines on the sea-shore of Northumberland, six or seven miles south of the Border river mouth, being pre- served l)y comprehension in the Tweed Act of 1859, while all such engines farther south have been swept away by the English Act of 1861. Why, in this matter, do justice to Cumberland, and upon Dumfries and Kirk- cudbright, and do injustice to Berwick by giving pri- vilege to Northumberland ? Why knock down those engines in the only place in Scotland where they were of old date, and sanction or protect them where they are innovations ? And why, on the other hand, preserve them at only one place in England, and sweep them away from all other English ground ? There is no answer to these questions, except the temporary and apologetic one, that there is a good time coming. The difiiculties in the way of obtaining a legislative measure on this subject which will make the Ihws square with justice and with themselves, consist in the strength of the " interest" concerned, and in the public, and con- sequently the Parliament, having laboured under a considerable amount of ignorance and misconception as to the facts and equity of the case. But the enem}''s 198 THE SALMON. strength is, to say the least, no greater than it was, whilst the strength on the right side has become greater, both by the discussions that have taken place, and by the actual advances made in recent legislation. Formerly the de- mand was that an evil existing in all the Three King- doms should be put down just because it was an evil, and, as the old Scotch Statutes had it, was an evil " de- structive of the commoun weill." But now, in addition, we can raise the cry of "justice to Scotland"— -can com- plain that the Scotch proprietors and public are refused the justice which has lately been accorded to England and even to Ireland. Remembering, however, the feeble and straggling support and the vigorous and compact resistance which the Lord Advocate found when he brought in his Bill of 1861, it may be doubted whether the Government could, in the meanwhile, be induced to renew a proposition which made so many enemies, and attracted so few and such captious friends. It is there- fore of the more importance to inquire whether there is not some possibility of settling the question without legislation ; or, to come to the point at once, by the Crow^n, as the owner of the fisheries on all the ungranted coasts, forcing or frightening the fixture-fishers on the granted coast into submission, by threatening, and threatening in earnest, to grant or lease the whole un- granted coast to new competitors. The Scottish sea- coasts, as to salmon-fishery, may, or lately might, be viewed as divided into three parts — a part which the Crown had granted away, and which was fished in a way the Crown never contemplated, and which the law never sanctioned, though it may accidentally have omitted to FUTURE SALMON LEUISLATION. 190 prohibit ; a part which the Crown had not granted away, but which was fished by the ex adverso proprie- tors of the soil without warrant ; and a part which was ungranted and unfished. When, in 1859, the decision of the House of Lords, sitting in appeal, settled that no person had a right to fish salmon in the Scotch seas without grant from the Crown, the Commissioners of Woods, Forests, and Land Revenue sent out circulars to 345 persons, exercising salmon -fishing on the sea-coast, without being positively known to possess charters, in- forming them that, unless they possessed valid titles under express grant from the Crown, the fisheries were the property of the Crown, and subject to the administra- tion of the Land Revenue Commissioners, but offering, in the cases where want of title was admitted, to give a short lease of the fisheries at a rental proportionate to the profits of the three years preceding. About a year after those circulars were issued, the Solicitor of the Land Revenue Commissioners stated to a Committee of the House of Lords, that 120 out of the 345 persons had sent no answer, that 180 titles were under investigation, and that twenty-nine persons had confessed want of title, and accepted short leases at rents amounting in all to about £600. Of the progress that has since been made little information has been allowed to transpire ; but we believe that the number of persons who have acknow- ledged want of title, and agreed to pay rent as temporary tenants of the Crown, has at least doubled since 1860, and that the rent now drawn on behalf of the public from this partially recovered property is upwards of £1200. Here is a pretty good beginning — £1200 a year restored 200 THE SALMON. to the public revenue, though there are as yet only about 50 convicts out of 345 suspects. But there is a great field beyond this one — a large though unascertained extent of coast which the Crown has never granted, and which nobody has taken illegal leave to fish. That property, which is public property, ought not to be allowed to lie unproductive ; it should be made to yield revenue, or perhaps something better than revenue. Two courses are open to the Commissioners of Land Revenue, besides the course pursued previous to the decision declaring the property to be the Crown's, and which it would be absurd and unjust any longer to continue. They may sell or let to the highest bidder all the coast still belonging to the Crown, whether or not previously fished ; and so, for a time, obtain a great revenue for the department, though to the ultimate injury of the general interests of the fish- eries, and of each particular interest, that of the depart- ment included. Or they may intimate to the pro|)rietors who have grants of fisheries on the coast, that if they con sent to put down their fixtures, and return to the modes by Avhich the}' originally fished, and by which alone other proprietors are allowed to fish, the Crown will do the same over all the coast which it still retains, and perhaps will engage not to fish in any way at least those parts of the coast that have heretofore not been fished at all — with certification that, if the fixed-netters will not consent to this compromise or mutual concession, the Crown will hand over every inch of its coast to the highest bidder, to be fished as they fish, which would very soon leave them nothing to fish for. That this result can be brought about, at least in a great many localities, is clear, by its FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 201 having in many cases been brought about abeady, through the appUcation of much smaller means than are at the command of the Crown. Some of the fisheries on the the Moray Firth, at which fixtures were earliest used, have been brought to worthlessness by the increase in the number of their neighbours ; and after the first stake-net erected on the coast of Aberdeenshire had raised the rental of that fishery from a mere trifle to £300, the erection of similar nets in the same district had the almost immediate effect of brino-inor back the rent of the first offender to a trifle again. With such examples before them, it is reasonable to hope that the fixed-net fishers might concede to fear what they have not unnaturally refused to fair-play, or at least that so many of them might thus become reasonable on compul- sion that the passing of an Act satisfactorily settling the whole matter would become easy and certain. At all events, it is only fair and well worth while to try, especially as even failure would be gain, ])y allotting the necessarily temporary profits of the bad system to the public instead of to individuals, while at present there is a class of men virtually paid with pul:)lic money to injure the public interests. Scarcely less important than the suppression of fix- tures used for capture and obstruction — in a large view, even more important and more urgent — is the question of legislation for the prevention and cure of pollution and poisoning in all running waters. The question here is not merely whether we shall preserve our fish, but whether we shall preserve our rivers — whether our rivers 202 THE SALMON. shall be rivers or sewers, beauties or deformities, pleasures or plagues. There is, however, a possibility worth guarding against, that a separation may be made in legislation and in popular discussion — as indeed it has to some ex- tent been made already — between that kind or degree of pollution which destroys fish, and that kind or degree which destroys rivers in other respects. In this case, rather unluckily, the general question of the purification of rivers does not cjuite necessarily include the perhaps smaller question of the preservation of fish, nor does the preservation of the fish quite necessarily include the puri- fication of the rivers. The fish, or at least the salmon, in a river may be to a great extent preserved, and yet that river he a public nuisance ; and on the other hand, the public nuisance may be greatly abated by means destructive of the fish. The existing fishery laws have clauses prohibiting the putting into rivers of any liquid or solid matter destructive of fish, but interfering no further ; whilst there is at present a visible danger that those interested in the purification of rivers on other grounds than those relating to fisheries may seek, as in some quarters they are already seeking, to attain their ends by means which, saving the noses and in some degree the health of the public, would bring the fish to sacrifice. The English Fisheries Act imposes penalties upon " every person who causes or knowingly permits to flow, or puts or knowingly permits to be put, into any waters containing salmon, or into any tributaries thereof, any liquid or solid matter, to such an extent as to cause the FUTUllE SALMON LEGISLATION. 203 waters to poison or kill fish," unless he can prove that he has " used the best practicable means, within a rea- sonable cost," to render the matter harmless. The clause in the Scotch Act is almost precisely the same, but spe- cifies saw-dust among noxious and prohibited matters. There is no doubt that much harm is prevented by these clauses on some salmon rivers ; but, besides that they do not apply to rivers not containing salmon, it will be noted that even in salmon rivers they do not apply to any kind of pollution or nuisance which is not absolutely poisonous to fish. So far as the clauses in the Fishery Acts extend, a river may give out offensive stenches through all its course, and yet escape the law, for it is found that ordinary town sewage, though most ofi'ensive to men, is not fatal to fish. " It has been clearly shown," said the English Commissioners of Inquiry, " that a very considerable amount of pollution may exist at certain points in a river without destroying the salmon or pre- venting them from passing up to spawn, provided the upper waters are favourable for that purpose, and that no artificial obstructions bar their way." In this way, the fisheries might be preserved, and yet the public nuisance remain. It is true that in various Acts, both English and Scotch, there are enactments against the poisoning of rivers in other respects : for instance, the Scotch Kemoval of Nuisances Act (1856) imposes a penalty of £50 on "any person engaged in the manu- facture of gas, naphtha, vitriol, or dye-stufi"s, or in any trade in which the refuse produced in any such manu- facture is used, who shall at any time cause or suffer to be brought or to flow into any streams, etc., any washing 204 THE SALMON. or other substance produced in any such manufacture, or shall wilfully do any act connected with any such manu- facture whereby the water in any such stream, etc., shall be fouled." This enactment has in some cases been beneficially put in operation, and the English Inspectors of Fisheries report (1863) that, under similar enactments in England, a great deal of pollution had been prevented, and some cured, not only without loss, but with con- siderable profit to the manufacturers, especially gas manufacturers and papermakers. There is, however, a great want both of uniformity and effectiveness in the laws relating to this species of nuisance, and as the nuisance is daily growing greater, the need of a general and effective law is daily becoming more felt and more clearly expressed. There is here a little danger, as well as a great op- portunity. There is the danger that those whose chief object is only the suppression of bad smells may consent to attain tlieii* object by some means, such as the dis- charge of chloride of lime, which, though depopulating the rivers, might lessen the evil to the dwellers on the river-banks. There is a great opportunity to all con- cerned, whether for property, or sport, or health, to make common cause against a great evil, which every day becomes not only greater, but more difficult of remedy, and which ah'eady has attained such magnitude and is invested with such difficulties that redress is not likely to be obtained by any means short of an employment of all the strength that can be obtained by the efforts of special interests, combined with the action of public opinion. FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 205 It is encouraging to perceive (though, as we shall see, there are local cases to the contrary) that some at least of the leaders in the causes both of Sanitaryism and of Fishery Preservation are awaking to the propriety and importance of making common cause in this matter. Lords Ebury and Shaftesbury, " on behalf of the sanitary associations of Great Britain," lia^'e united with Lord Saltoun, the President, and Lord Llanover, the Vice- President, of the Fisheries Preservation Association, in addressing a statement to Lord Palmerston, in which they set forth the magnitude to which the evils have attained, and the necessity for immediate legislation, directed to preserving alike the health of men and the lives of fish. That the pollution of the rivers of the country is so great and general as to have become a national evil, was the conclusion arrived at several years ago by the Royal Commissioners on the Sewage of Towns, — a conclusion arrived at without any reference to the interests of the fisheries, but solely with a view to the public comfort and health ; and when the interests of the fisheries are also taken into consideration, the evil appears still greater and still more truly national. This evil may be regarded as presenting itself in two forms : in some instances, inland towns send their impurities through far-stretching rural districts ; in others, the villages and manufactories on a river send down stench and pestilence on great seats of population below. The great and unpleasant question whether it is necessary or endurable that all the rivers of the country should be transformed into common sewers, has been raised earliest and as yet chiefly in the 206 THE SALMON. former class of cases — and even in that class by causes which are comparatively new. The evils in this respect, arising from the increased and ever-increasing size of onr inland towns, and the great though yet but com- mencing change in domestic arrangements, and in the system of draining and sewage, may be said to be almost new things, at least on the chief rivers frequented by salmon ; but they are growing rapidly, and are in their nature difficult and sometimes impossible to arrest, unless taken in their beginnings. Till lately, our large towns were chiefly (in Scotland entirely) on the coast, or within tide-reach on some estuary or navigable river, and their drainage went off to the sea with comparatively little harm or offence, except in such extreme cases as London and perhaps Glasgow. It was assumed, too, that this state of things was permanent and unalterable. About sixty years ago, a traveller (Kev. James Hall), beginning an account of his tour through Scotland, thus refers to the considerations which determined his choice of route : " There never was and never will be any thriving city or village at a distance from water-carriage, and every large city or town always has been and always will be situated either on the sea-coast or on the banks of some navigable river." But now the railway system, with its cheap and rapid carriage of materials, goods, and fuel, is enabling manufacturing towns to rise in far inland localities, and the fact is gradually appearing that such towns, sending their drainage for scores of miles down the rivers, do, or at least will, create a really national nuisance — a nuisance greater than that produced by towns many times their size situated within the cleansinor influences of the sea- FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 20 7 tide. Take the' Tweed for an instance. The woollen manufacturers on the banks of the Tweed and its tribu- taries now make almost no use of the wool produced on the hills overhanging their own tall chimneys, but bring their materials from Saxony and Australia, their coals from the Lothians and Northumberland, and find their markets over all the world ; what has been done there (-an and we hope will be done in other inland districts ; and we rejoice to see Hawick, Selkirk, and Galashiels already on their way to be Bradfords and Halifaxes. But contemplate the results of having large towns fifty or sixty miles from the sea — with contributions from every village and even farm house — sending their whole refuse down the river-channel through five counties ! Look at what the Tweed is now, in contrast with what will be its look and smell at that not distant then. See her and hers rolling along, beautiful and beautifying, through regions where every ruin is history and every glen is song ; gathering her tributes from a thousand hills — from where sweet Teviot sings unceasingly its " Farewell to Cheviot's mountains blue ;" where pensive Yarrow winds like a silver chain amid "the dowie dens;" where, in the sad and silent "Forest" — " The wildered Ettrick wanders by, Loud miirmiiring to the careless moon ; " till, grown stately, massive, and brimming, "Tweed's fair river, broad and deep," wheeling beneath the donjon keep of Norham and the battlements of Berwick, sinks into the ocean as glittering pure as when she liroke away from her native hills. Is all this to vanish, and in its place a pestilential sewer ? Is that which now spreads 208 THE SALxMON. health and beauty around, to l^econie an eye-sore and a nose-sore extending over half the breadth of the Island ? Shall the turrets of Abbotsford be reflected from a mon- ster gutter, all stains and stench ? Shall fair Melrose, instead of being " viewed aright by the pale moonlight," be nosed in the dark ? Forbid it, all the powers of Par- liament ! If indeed that prohibition could not be uttered without destroying or impeding the brisk and cheerful industry which has sprung up among those sweet hills, there might be nothing for it but to sigh and submit. But it would be almost profane to doubt that from so great an evil there must be means of escape — that Hawick may prosper and yet Tweed be preserved. The manu- facturers in great towns have already been made to con- sume their smoke, and the time seems coming when compulsion to the same effect will be applied even to London householders — when even " the sacred domestic hearth" shall be invaded by the oflicers of Sanitaryism. The Londoners have agreed to impose upon themselves a vast expense, in order to cease making a sewer of their own Thames ; and can it be doubted that if the people of the towns on the Tweed and other such rivers shall fciil to find the will, there will be comparatively little difficulty in the Legislature finding the luay to prevent their doing what they unhappily like with a river which is not their own, l^ut is the property of five counties, and the pride of Two Kingdoms ? Nor, as already said, is the case one in which the towns are always the offenders, and the rural districts the sufferers ; sometimes the position of the parties is reversed, and country gives town as bad as it gets. FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 209 When a river, near its mouth, runs through a great town, as most rivers do, all the polluting and noxious matter, liquid and solid, sent out from the dwelling-houses and manufactories of the country above, comes past the doors of tens or hundreds of thousands of people, who probably are successfully labouring to protect themselves from themselves, but find it difficult or impossible, as it is cer- tainly very hard, to protect themselves from their neigh- bours. In at least one view, there is even a greater injustice in this case than in the other ; a populous in- land town may be said to have more natural right to send its nuisances through thinly populated rural dis- tricts, than thinly populated rural districts have to take the same improper liberty with a great sea-coast town. In illustration of this, as of the other form of the evil, take an actual instance. The great towns of Edinburgh and Leith, having the same small river running through both, lately agreed upon costly measures to keep the open water-course free from the town sewage. It w^as found, however, that, owing to the presence of villages and manufactories farther up the stream, the water came into the precincts of the city in an impure and noisome condition. Consequently, or naturally, it was proposed that the few people above, or at least the manufacturers, should take measures to the same end as the many people below ; that, when 200,000 people were subjecting themselves to trouble and taxation to rescue a river from the condition of a nuisance caused by the multifarious occupati(3ns of two large towns, those efforts and sacrifices should not be neutralized by the neglect of a dozen or two of people beyond the o 210 THE SALMON. towns to do likewise, for their own as well as their neighbours' good. It was pleaded, however, for the people above, that while they discoloured and defiled the water, they did so with ingredients which, though certainly rendering it poisonous to man, beast, and fish, yet prevented, killed, or cured stench, and might l)e made to operate more efficaciously to that end. This plea was practically allowed, neither party taking any account of the fact that the ingredients (chiefly chloride of lime) which are most effectual to prevent stench arising from the water, are also most efiectual to produce death to everything under or even upon the water. Multitudes of similar case^ elsewhere may possibly be settled in a similar way, the public in the matter of rivers content- ing itself with saving its nose, to the deprivation of its mouth and the damage of its eyes, to say nothing of what there is much to be said about, the extirpation of all the creatures to which the waters have been given as a dwelling-place. It is a compromise which should be discountenanced and resisted in the interest not only of fish, and of all who catch fish, but of all who eat fish, and all who value either the beauties or the edibles which nature has provided. It is a device for making a solitude, and calling it purity ; for depriving rivers of life, and boasting that there is no corruption in their wretched remains. Thus to kill or depopulate rivers may be denounced as a violation of almost everything sacred ; of justice, for it robs some men for the con- venience of others ; of reason, for it is perpetrating an injury which is at once enormous and avoidable ; of nature, and even of religion, for the command is, that the waters shall bring forth abundantly. FUTURE S.^LMON LEGISLATION. 211 Nevertheless, some people venture to say that the infliction of sterility on the waters by artificial means is natural, because river-courses are the natural drains of the country, and because thus it is natural that all dirt should descend through these drains. But there is neither proof nor probability as to this being a correct interpretation of the designs of Nature in the making of rivers ; and though it were otherwise, the fact would not be much to the purpose. Nature, we beg to suggest, intended river-courses for rivers, and rivers are naturally composed of water that rises from the ground and water that falls from the clouds. There is no written proof nor visible probability that Nature designed river-courses as conduits or open sewers for the running off of lime, soda, and vitriol. On the contrary, there is good evi- dence that Nature intended rivers, among other good purposes, to furnisli a supply of drink to man, beast, and bird, to say nothing of fish ; and it is a fair inference that whatever renders rivers unfit for so obvious and great a purpose, is a violation of the designs of Nature. Indeed, it would be quite enough to say that Nature, beyond all doubt, designed rivers to be the habitation of fish ; and that if lime, vitriol, soda, and filth are in- compatible with fish, it is not the fish, but the filth, that is out of place. But suppose it proved or likely that Nature had any such grotesque and inconsistent design as is so unwarrantably imputed to her, it is sometimes necessary, for the preservation of life and for other good and sufficient causes, to counteract or neutralize even natural operations. People do this habitually in personal and domestic matters, and even in this very matter of 212 THE SALMON. drainage, so far as it is personal or domestic. It is natural for the efflux from a dwelling-house to go down the slope ; but if that slope happens to lead through the householder's grounds or garden, or past his windows, he is careful to cover up the stream from sight and smell, till, and only till, it reaches a spot where he can dis- tribute the nuisance among his neighbours. Whenever the filth reaches the river or natural water-course, some people seem to think it becomes innocuous or almost sacred, though in truth it has only become an injustice as well as an evil, and has acquired a thousandfold greater power of mischief. Why do people thus refuse to let " Nature " have her way with their own noses, and then argue that it is right and necessary that she should be left free to take her will of the public nose ? Just because " what is everybody's business is nobody's busi- ness"— because everybody has been looking after him- self, and nobody after the public. The importance of the neglect is now, however, beginning to be discovered, and both communities and the Legislature seem more than formerly inclined to attend to a business much more important than many things regarding which there is much making of speeches and of laws. The past neglect as to the polluting and poisoning of rivers is the more remarkable that there is no want of precedents for legislative protection and restriction in matters of the same class. Take the case of the poison- ing of the atmosphere. It is at least as natural for smoke or fumes to rise into the air as for poisonous and stinking substances to fall into the waters. Yet the law compels all manufacturers, or others who send forth FUTURE SALMON LEGISLATION. 213 offensive or injurious smoke and smells, either to render their effluvium harmless by means of gigantic chimneys, or to consume it on the premises. Since gigantic manu- factories are thus trammelled and burdened to prevent their deteriorating the atmosphere in their immediate neighbourhood, is it not equitable and reasonable that similar restrictions should be laid upon those who not only deteriorate but poison the waters of many neigh- bourhoods besides their own ? When the law puts re- straint upon those whose operations could only injure the hedges and herbage of three or four fields, why should it give license to those who inflict loss, ugliness, and disease on as many counties ? 214 THE SALMON. CHAPTER VL NON-LEGISLATIVE REMEDIES. Domestic Breeding and Ree recognised, too, a provision of Natuie to compensate for the incomparably greater waste or de- struction which afflicts the inhabitants of the water than at least any useful species upon the land. The fact, how- ever, that Nature, for whatever ends, has made the water more prolific than the land, is no reason at all why man should reduce the water to sterility while making such efforts to maintain and increase the fertility of the land ; nay, should even destroy the water with what might further enrich the land. For it is a fact, that whilst the utmost that skill, capital, and labour could do has been done for the land, not only has nothing been done for the water, but a great deal has been done against it ; and especially, enormous mischief is done by materials that should be kept to give fertility to the land being sent away to inflict sterility on the waters. At last, however, something is being done for the water ; the discovery has been made, or re-made, that man can, by enclosure and cultivation, do perhaps as much for fish as he can for plants. Pisciculture, or the cultivation of fish, is now a great industry in France, and is beginning to assume large proportions even in this country. To narrate all that has been done would be here quite out of place, for our topic is only salmon, which, as a migratory fish, must always form a separate or special, if not a comparatively small department of this neAv 222 THE SALMON. industry ; besides which, the subject is treated with the care and minuteness it requires in the recent volumes of Mr. Frank Buckland and Mr. Francis Francis. There is no dispute, however, as to the fact that the results in France have been great ; there is not the slightest reason to doubt that they will be proportionally great here ; and that those who have laboured and are labouring to in- crease and improve this mode of producing food, are labouring for a great public good. If he is a national benefactor who makes two blades grow in place of one, what shall be said of him who makes ten thousand fish swim where only two fish swam before ? Of course, as in all other things, and especially in all the beginnings of things, there have been and will be some mistakes — chiefly, as we think, in the matter of acclimatization, or the transplanting, so to speak, of the fish from one country or district where it is indigenous to an- other where it is exotic. To populate where the inhabitants had become extinct or scarce, is quite a different thing from bringing in some new race among a piscine com- munity already sufficiently numerous for the local means of livelihood. In waters not actually poisoned, or other wise artificially desolated, the number or amount of 7'esi- dent fish is, generally speaking, regulated by the amount of food ; and to bring more fish to a river so conditioned does not in the end really operate as an increase of the quantity of fish, but only as a change of the kind. In many cases the change may be for the better ; in all cases where it is practicable, it would be well to cultivate salmon and trout, for instance, to the displacing of chub and perch. But sometimes we see an opposite course adopted, and NON-LEGISLATIVE REMEDIES. 223 other important considerations overlooked. Thus, the late experiment, in one sense quite successful, of intro- ducing grayling into the upper portions of the river Clyde, is open to grave doubts. It may fairly be assumed that the supply of trout in the Clyde was up to the supply of food, or at least if it were not, it was owing to injurious causes to which grayling will be equally liable ; so that to introduce grayling was practically to make a proportionate diminution in trout. Now, the grayling, though a good fish, is not so good a fish as the trout, and so the exchange was for the worse. Then the grayling is a fish which is in season during winter ; and though angling at Christmas may do very well in Devon- shire, or the other natural habitats of the grayling, it would be both an unpleasant and unproductive employ- ment in the Upper Ward of Lanarkshire. Finally, when grayling are in season, trout are spawning, and vice versa ; and, as the two species have the same haunts, the same process will, almost all the year round, be effective in slaying alike the clean and the unclean, and any law that may be made to the contrary will be of no effect. There can, however, be no mistakes of this class as to the artificial introduction or rearing of salmon in any river; for, besides that the salmon is not a formidable competitor with any other species as to food, it is the most valuable and desirable of all fish. Of course there is, in the case of salmon, the heavy drawback arising from its being migratory and vagabond in its instincts and habits ; but still much can be done, and not a little has been done, to increase the stock of salmon by semi- artificial propagation and semi-domestic rearing. It is 224 THE SALMON. obvious that salmon ah ovo, and before that, up to the age of puberty, are, in their natural abodes, exposed to very great perils, the chief of which may be classed as preventible. Thus, there is enormous loss by spawn being deposited during floods, when the rivers are high, in positions where, when the waters fall, it is destroyed by frosts or drought, or trampled under foot of man and beast ; an evil of late very greatly increased by the ex- tension of land drainage, especially the hill or open drain- age, which causes the rivers both to rise higher and to sink lower and more rapidly. Then great quantities of the ova are devoured by fish and birds ; and after the fish are hatched, their dangers from other sources, up to the period of their seaward emigration, are still greater. These and sundry other evils can be avoided, to a great extent, by semi-domestic rearing ; the eggs can be pre- served from accident, and the young kept separate from their natural enemies until the time comes when they themselves think they have sufficient strength and know- ledge to seek their fortunes abroad. The extent to which the preventible evils operate, and to which they may be cured, cannot be stated with precision, but enough is known to indicate, with considerable certainty, that a very considerable work of restoration may be accom- plished. Sir Humphry Davy's estimate was that, on the average, each salmon deposits 17,000 eggs, of which only 800 come to perfection ; and although even his authority on such a point is not decisive, we have nothing better. Then as to the destruction from various causes that takes place after the hatching, we may form, though not an arithmetically accurate, a sufficiently clcni' and Jroye idea, NON-LEGISLATIVE REMEDIES. 225 by merely reflecting for a moment on the fact (after making all allowance for the number killed by man), that a fish which nniltiplies itself eight hundred fold ever}^ year is yet saved from ra})id decline only by a great amount of legislative protection and favour. AVliat breeding-ponds have already done and have shown ccDi be done, in applying a remedy at this point, is striking. The ova deposited at Stormontheld in the first year (1853) were 300,01)0 ; the tish hatched and brought up to the migratory age were, according to the best census practicable, about 260,000. In other words, while (accepting Sir Humphry's statement) only one in twenty of the eggs deposited in the natural spawning-beds are hatched, the proportion hatched of those deposited in the artificial ponds is something like nine in ten. Similar results have been obtained at Stormontfield in each year of the last ten, or rather iii each alternate year, there having been, until lately, only one pond, and it having for some years been held desirable, owing to the fry of each propagation departing in two difierent years, not to introduce a new brood into the pond till all of the former brood had departed. By the five or six hatch- ings which have taken place at Stormontfield, nearly a million and a half of sniolts have been furinshed to the Tay, only a small though unascertainable propor- tion of which would have reached that stage had they and their parents been left to the natural or ordinary chances of the open river. It is not practicable to ascertain the extent to which these (jpc,' rations have contri1)uted to the great rise in the produce of the Ta}^ fisheries which has taken place witlun these few years, for other Ijeneficial r 226 THE SALMON. causes, such as the lengthening of the chjse-time, have been at work during portions of the same period. A similar remark applies, in a less degree, to the more extensive operations carried on in Galway by Mr. Ash- worth, who, since he resorted to transplanting and arti- ficial rearing, along with better protection and other such appliances, has found the produce or annual capture of his fisheries to have increased no less than tenfold. What the system of nursing and protecting the young of the salmon till reaching the migratory stage can do is plain enough, though not capable of exact measure- ment : it aff'ords almost entire protection from the dangers and destruction which beset eggs lying exposed for months to floods and frost, and beasts, birds, and fishes of prey, and also from those which beset the young fry, exposed for more than a year or two years of the most helpless period of their existence to hosts of devouring enemies, human as w^ell as inhuman. What proportion of the enor- mous destruction which undoubtedly befalls the salmon race between birth and marriage accrues during the period in which the race can be thus cared for, cannot be ascertained ; Ijut it is certain, and it is enough, that the loss or waste during that period is stupendous, and the gain or saving of semi-domestic rearing proportion- ally great. What the system cannot accomplish, is equally ol)vi- ous — it cannot, as things stand, do much or anything for the fish after the age of infancy. And this is not only a great drawback in itself, but it tends powerfully to produce difiiculties and discouragements as to the doing of what can really and 1)eneficially be done. One XON-LEGISLATIVE KEMEDIES. 227 man breeds, and another catches ; one man pays, and another profits. If the fish bred and nursed in ponds could also be reared till near their full growth, under the care of man, and for the profit of those who had been at the cost of breeding and caring for them, we might look with certainty for a great and rapid increase in the number of salmon-nurseries, and for proportionate results visible in the rivers and in the markets. But the peculiarity of pisciculture as applied to salmon — which has not been sufficiently taken into account by those who have drawn inferences from the great success attending the stocking of certain French rivers with non-migratory fish — is, that, as soon as you have brought your brood past the perils of birth and infancy, you must let them forth to the world of waters — " the world not their friend, nor (sufficiently) the world's law" — without the thousandth part of a chance that they will ever return to reward their early benefactors. " Upon the river Thurso," said Mr. W. Dunbar to the House of Lords Committee, in 1860, "I have artificial ponds, and have had for some years, for the purpose of increasing the fish ; and then these men put in their bag-nets, and catch the fish which I have reared with the greatest care in the world, before they come up to me." And obviously this must be the common case. The obstacle, however, is at least in part removable, if it were pos- sible to devise and enforce any system by which the salmon-trade could be made to act with some degree of concert and co-operation — as indeed it does on the Tay as to this one matter of breeding-ponds — instead of its members striving, as at present, which shall do 228 THE SALMON. most towards the extermination of the means wherc1)y all of them alike have their living. That such a system can Ije devised, or rather is lying ready, 1)ut unused — that a vast reformation can he wrought in the whole business of salmon-fishing, with large profit to all concerned — is, we submit, a great fact, and easy of demonstration ; though, like most great truths or discoveries, there is difficulty in getting it audience. We hold that the whole present system of net-fishing for salmon proceeds on a false plan, bequeathed from times of which the circumstances were quite different, and that it performs exj^ensively and ill what might he performed chea2:>ly and well. At present, those who have a common though not an equal interest compete against each other under artificial re- strictions— or, so to speak, run a race against each other, each runner heavily weighted, for a prize which belongs to and ultimately goes to all of them in proportions as ascertainable before as after the race. What we propose is, that competition should cease, and that there should come in its place amalgamation or co-operation. The present system is a scramble : each man having a few yards of river bends his efforts to catch as many fish as he can ; and the grand object of all the innumer- able and complicated laws on the subject is to preATnt his efforts from being too effective. This is a system of very natural growth ; l)ut it has ]iow grown to be a great and unnecessary evil and an anachronism. The proportionate value of every man's rights in any river is now accurately ascertained : whv should not all the NON-LEGISLATIVE 1!EMEDTES. 229 owners on any given liver form themselves, as it were, into a joint-stock company, this man having a fourth sliare, and that a fortieth, and then proceed to fish the river in the way hest for all of them considered as one interest, and divide the money proceeds among the shareholders according to the number or proportion of their shares ? More specifically, our radical reform is this, — to erect or work in each river, at such place or several places as might be most suitable, some engines which shall, during periods properly regulated and re- stricted, take possibly every fish which ascends to them, or allow all to pass, dividing the expense and the produce among the proprietors of the fisheries in the proportion which t]ie present value of the fishery of each bears to the present value of the whole. That such engines are quite possible, there is no doubt ; indeed, the wJiole aim of legislation hitherto has been to prevent the erection of anything resembling them. Keeping, then, this fact in view, how foolish and wasteful the present system appears when scrutinized ! The salmon does and must travel for the whole extent of his fresh-water journey along a road, so to sjjeak, of a few yards wide. In many cases, we can at some part or parts of that road erect a bar or pit-fall, ])y which we may, when we wish, infallibly catch him, or through which, when it suits our end, we may let him pass un- molested. But i]istead of that, we prohibit all such bars, and set some hundreds of men at some scores of stations to make sliots at him as he darts past, shootino-, too, be it rememljered, in the dark. There is nothing analogous to this to l)e found any\^•here, keeping in mind 230 THE SALMON. that the killing is for profit only. It is as if a warrener should come among his rabbits with hundreds of beaters and terriers, instead of quietly placing his traps at the mouths of the burrows. Nay, that is but a feeble simi- litude ; for there are hundreds of holes in the warren, and but one passage in the river. Although salmon- netting is not performed for sport, it really amounts, when examined and described, to a very costly, unneces- sary, and unamusing fish-hunt. For an instance, follow the process of catching, or failing to catch, a Tweed salmon. Descend a few minutes into the German Ocean, somewhere about Holy Island, and accompany a short way an individual of the species Salmo solar, on his return, after months spent in the deep hiding-places wdiere neither human eye nor human knowledge has ever yet been able to follow him. And who can resfard him without interest ! He is on his first return to his native place, far up in " bonnie Teviotdale," or among " the dowie dens of Yarrow ;" and (which is more important to the present subject of discourse) he is on his marriage-jaunt. But he is in haste. Onward he goes — bump on the first of thirty standing-nets which festoon the beach of Goswick. By extraordinary good luck, he gets past the traps — and out among the waiting seals and porpoises. After a sharp run, this fortunate and coveted fish escapes into the mouth of the river, — and whiz ! goes a " net-and- coble" before his nose, ere he has enjoyed two minutes of the fresh water. During his first hour's possession of his new element, or three miles' progress, the same attempt has been repeated somewhere about a score of times. A NOX-LEGLSLATIVE REMEDIES. 231 change in the sport is then offered for his amusement. The shooting is no longer done at random, and he sails upwards thinking he has left all the fun behind ; but chancing in his careless happiness to sh(jw a fin or make a ripple in passing a " ford" or shallow, a resounding " Pow !" (which is the Bermck or Northumbrian euph- emism ioY pull), proceeds from the watcher, and a boat's crew, rushing from the sheiling, shoot a net right across his passage, beyond him and around him. Again let us imagine him to be in luck, and to pass in this exhila- rating manner upwards of fifty stations, each of them with two nets, to say nothing now (for they have lately been removed) of some ninety cairn nets, which, at every spot where he was likely to seek rest, were set up for his reception. This brings him as far as Coldstream Bridge, where we shall leave him to cleave onward to new dangers, for he is only " saved to-day, to-morrow to be slain" — to fall by the rod of a Duke at Kelso, or (which is at least quite as likely) by the leister of a weaver at Peebles. But what is the summary of his career thus far ? He has roused to the chase 350 men ; there have been expended on him, in wages and mate- rials alone (such is our careful calculation), at least £10 ; he was worth 2s. id. ; and he's off! This, of course, is an extreme case ; take, then, one of an opposite character. Instead of a single fish, a shoal, or, as it is technically called, a head have come up. The same engines are set to work, but with great success. Out of 500, 490 are captured, and ten make their way onward, five (say) to be killed by the Dukes or the weavers (we are stating fairly, from statistics. 232 THE SALMON. the proportions killed by tlie net and rod), and live to spawn ; and the same thing is possibly repeated, tid(.' after tide, for weeks. Compared with both of these extreme eases, and with all conceivabh^ cases, onr plan assuredly would be an immense improvement. Such engines as we propose, and as are known to be perfectly practicable, would neither expend money and labour in a blind and unsuccessful attempt to take a single fish, nor slaughter all that entered for a week, without regard either to the interests of those ab(ive, or to the providing of a supply for the future. They would, under such regulations as should be agreed on, capture all within a certain proportion of time, and let all go free within the remaining proportion. And they would do all this at a mere fraction of the expense of the present more harmful and less productive system. On the Tweed, the cost of labour and materials absorbs about two-thirds of the selling-price of the fish. That is the cost of fishing the river by fifty stations. Our plan might possibly work it l)y one, and certainly by very few. And it must not be supposed that the Tweed is an unfairly selected instance. On the con- trary, if we had taken the Tay, where there are between eighty and ninety stations, with two boats and two nets at each, we should have brought out results at least as effective for our purpose. In dealino- with the various interests concerned in such a change, we foresee no difficulties which may not easily and equitably be overcome. In the times in which the existing system arose, it would have been absurd to hope for reasonable co-operation towards such an o])ject; and XON-LEGISLATIVE KEMEDIES. 233 the law, being too weak and loose to enforce sul^mission to arrangements for the general gO(3d, could only prohibit whatever would give a local or individual monopoly, and then abandon all to the barbarous and wasteful system of " catch wlio can." But circumstances have now changed, and the road to a rational method is open to us. The absolute and relative value of every salmon- fishing property being now pretty well ascertained, the propor- tion which the share of each proprietor bears to the whole of his river or district can be settled 1)y arbitration and evidence, and that, of course, would be the proportion which he should draw from the one common or Q-eneral fishery. In making such an arrangement, some men would doubtless think that they had been allotted less than their share ; 1)ut even if any man were, according to his own estimate, made worse ofi' proportionally, he would nevertheless be Ijetter off positively ; he might be able to think himself not so mucli benefited as his neighbours, but he would not 1)e al)le to deny that he too had bene- fited, and the public with him. It is now m(3re than a dozen years since this radical reform was propounded ; and a similar suggestion (of which we were not then aware) was made privately, so long ago as 1839, 1)y Mr. Thomson of Banchory, who proposed to his brother-proprietors on tlie xVberdeen- shire Dee that they should form themselves into " one fishing company," and fish tlie river for the common benefit, as near the mouth as practicable, with as few engines as might be found sufficient. But up to this hour the plan has only been smiled at or sneered at as a chimera, although any specific or tangible ol)jection 234 THE SALMON. brought against it has proceeded upon a misunderstand- ing. Thus, it has been objected to as if necessarily meaning the erection of one engine capable of capturing or passing at will whatever might be thought the proper proportion of fish to capture or to pass — a proportion w^hich could be measured either by time or number. In many rivers there are insuperable natural difficulties in the way of erecting such an engine, but the substance or principle of the proposal is simpl}^, that no more ma- chinery should be used than is 7iecessary, or than would be used if one man owned the whole river ; and there is plenty of room between one engine, and one hundred doing the work which could be as well or better done by a dozen. Nothing has been said, or is likely to be said, in disproof of the truth, that one effect of such a reform would be a great saving of expense in wages and mate- rials, which at present seem to amount, on the chief fisheries, to nearly three-fourths of the total value of the produce ; and that a still grander result would be, the putting an end to wasteful strife, opening up a free field for amicable co-operation, and making simple a hundred questions which are now complex, by transforming, at one stroke, the contending parties from competitors to partners. In a word, it would introduce into the pisca- torial realms the three great, well-known, and much- coveted benefits of Peace, Reform, and Retrenchment. THE END. APPENDIX. TABLE, showing the Open Seasons for Net-Fishing and for EoD-FiSHiNG in the Kivers of Scotland, so far as fixed at May 1864. NET. ROD. Add, Awe, Feb. 16 to Aug. 31. Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 16 to Oct. 31. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Beauly, .... Berriedale, .... Bervie, ..... Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 25 to Sept. 9- Feb. 11 to Oct. 15. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Feb. 25 to Oct. 31. Clyde and Leven, . Conan, .... Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Dee (Aberdeen), . Dee (Kirkciulbiiglit), . Deveron, .... Doon, ..... Don, Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Echaig, .... Esk (North and South), Feb. 16 to Aug. 31. Feb. 16 to Aug. 31. Feb. 16 to Oct. 31. Feb. 16 to Oct. 31. Findhorn, .... Fleet Forss, ..... Forth, Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 25 to Sept. 9. Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Oct. 10. Feb. 25 to Oct. 31. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Feb. 1 1 to Oct. 1 5. Girvan, .... Feb. 25 to Sept. 9. Feb. 25 to Oct. 31. Kyle of Sutherland (Carron, Cassely, Oikel, and Shin), Feb. 1 1 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Oct. 15. Luce, Feb. 25 to Sept. 9. Feb. 25 to Oct. 31. Nairn, Ness, ..... Nith Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. P'eb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 11 to Oct. 15. Feb. 11 to Oct. 15. Feb. 11 to Oct. 31. Spey, Stinchav, .... Feb. 11 to Aug. 26. Feb. 25 to Sept. 9. Feb. 11 to Oct. 15. Feb. 25 to Oct. 31. Tay Tweed (under Ant 1859), Feb. 4 to Aug. 20. Feb. 15 to Sept. 14. Feb. 4 to Oct. 10. Feb. 1 to Nov. 30. Ugie, Urr, Feb. 25 to Sept. 9. Feb. 25 to Sept. 9. Feb. 25 to Oct. 31. Feb. 25 to Oct. 31. Ythan, .... Feb. 25 to Sept. 9. Feb. 25 to Oct. 31. 1 INDEX. Aberdeen and Kincardine, Fixed engines on coast of, 129. Abor-igines of Borders did not use fish, 3. Acclimatization of fish, 222. Acts (ancient) before and after Magna Charta, 1?>5. Acts, Repeal of thirty-three old, 174. Adamson (llev. W. Agar), Paper by, quoted, 89-90. Adventures of a Tweed salmon, 230 Age when parr assumes appearances and habits of smolt, 40. Allusions to angling by British Poets, 25-27. Aln, Bull-trout in, 71. America (North), Abundance of sal- mon in, 6. American rivers, Depopulation of, 89. Angler versus Butcher, 19-23. Angler for salmon in the Tweed de- scribed, 15-17. Anglers good men, 24. Angling, Charms of, 17. Anomalies (apparent) not to inter- fere with settlement of period of migration, 44. Anthony competing with Cleopatra us an angler, 29. Apprentices, Clause in indentures of, 94, 95. Argyle's (Duke of) Bill in 1851, 140. Artificial introduction of salmon. Reasons for, 223, 224. Ascent of smolt, Period of, 53. Ashworth's (Mr.) operations on rais- ing salmon in Galway, 226. " Assisted passage" supposed to pro- mote growth, 50. Assumptions in books of naturalists, 61. Atmosphere, Poisoning of, taken cog- nisance of by law, 212. Baker's wife and Candide, 59. " Bar-nets" prohibited at mouth nf Tweed, 126. Beauly fisheries affected by fixed en- gines, 129, 130. Beauly and Ness, Private Bill for, in 1860, 165 ; period for fi.shing now allowed, 171. Beginning of season varies in rivers, 118. Berners (Dame Julyana), Prioress of St. Albans, 24. Berwick, Boxes of salmon sent from, 100. Bill of 1857 on Tweed fisheries, 153 ; its main object, 157 ; of 1859, 155. Bill of 1861. Lord Advocate's, 166 ; how treated by Select Committee, 167. Bill of 1861 for England passed, 173. Bill of 1862, Lord Advocate's, 168, 169. Bill of 1863 regulating exportation of salmon, 176. 238 INDEX. Bills about salmon, Many, but few Acts, 140. "Black-fin," 81. "Black-tails," 70, 71. Boothia Felix, Value of salmon in, o. Boundaries, Natural, between estu- aries and seas, to be fixed by Com- missioners, 169. Branlin, Local name of young sal- mon, 35. Breeding ponds. Value of, 227. Breeding (by Mr. Shaw) of parrs from two salmon, 40. Brewster (Sir David), on eye of parr and salmon being of similar forma- tion, 36. Brood, name of young salmon north- ward, 35. Brora — Francks on export of pickled salmon, 96. Brown fish difficult to catch, 153. Bruce — Acts for the preservation of salmon in reign of llobert the Bruce, 136. Buckland (Frank) on Pisciculture, referred to, 222. Buist (Mr. Robert) of Perth, his services, 52. Bull-trout and salmon, Difference in habits of, 127. Bull-trout of Tweed, 70, 71. Burt (Captain) on Branlin and " Sal- mon frye," 35. on Price of Salmon at Inver- ness, 92. Byron (Lord) on Izaak Walton, 24. Cairn-nets dealt with by Bill of 1857, 154, 159; described, 158. Canadian Legislature abolish leister- ing, 163. Capture of grilse and salmon in Tweed, annual average for five years, 74. ^ Carlisle, fishery belonging to its Cor- poration affected by stake-nets, 131. Carriage, slowness and dearness of, caused local cheapness, 96. Causes of decrease of salmon, 114- 133. Charge of cruelty answered, 19-24. Charters for sea-coast fisheries all granted before fixed engines were thought of, 181 ; the earliest, 183 ; the latest, 190. Clean spring salmon, what are they wanting ? 86. Cleopatra an angler on the Cydnus, 29. Close-Season, killing of spawning fish in, a cause of decrease, 117. shortening or mistiming of, a cause of decrease, 117. on Scotch rivers fixed at May 1864, see Table, p. 235. in English rivers as fixed by Act of 1861, 173. Clyde now depopulated of salmon, 116. Cod, marked salmon found in stomach of, 85. Commissioners, power given to by Bill of 1862, 169. Commissioners of Land Revenue, courses open to, 200. " Common Fishciries" in Ireland, 8. Common law of England on salmon fisheries, 135. Conon, fisheries on, transferred to Cromarty Firth, 193. Coquet, Bull-trout in, 71. Cost of fish affected by advance of season, 52. Costly sport, salmon angling, 15. Cotton's lines on peaceableness of anglers, 29. INDEX. 239 Criminal offence, illegal night fishing by three or more persons, 172. Cromarty Firth, fisheries in, 193. Crown-grants and fixed engines, 180- 185. Crown-rights in salmon fisheries in Scotland, 7. Cruelty of anglers, charge answered, 19-24. Cruives and yairs, 188. Cruives on river Ness in olden times, 93. should be abolished, 195. Culture of salmon, artificial, now com- menced, 214. Cuts, marking by, not to be depended on, 54. Davy (Sir Humphry), ardour as an angler, 28. on the sea- shore being the course of the salmon, 123. estimate of number of ova laid by salmon, 224. Decay in supply of salmon, 88. Decline of salmon in English and Welsh rivers, evidence in 1860, 98. Dee and Don fisheries, 9. Defoe on abundance of salmon in, 92. produce affected by erection of fixed engines, 129. period for net-fishing now al- lowed, 171. Defoe on abundance of salmon in Scotland, 92, 93. Dempster of Dunnichen packs salmon in ice, 4. Destruction of salmon life in the sea, 84, 85. in Canadian rivers, 90. Difference in habits of salmon of Tweed and tho.se of the Ness, Spey, Tay, etc., 110. Difiiculties in investigation of salmon's history, 32. Dogmatism on history of salmon, 31. Doubleday (Thomas) a devoted angler, 29. Drainage (Land), Increase of, as af- fecting salmon, 114-116. Drink for man, beast, bird, and fish, rivers intended as, 211. Dryden an angler, 27. Dunbar (W.) on ponds on Thurso river, 227 ; on fixed nets, 194. Dunninald, Forfjirshire, first stake- net erected at, 189. Duration of salmon life reduced by too much fishing, 105. Durfey an angler, 27. ELLENBOROUGit (C. J.), on ancicut legislation, 135. Ellice (Mr.) proposes regulation of fisheries handed over to the Board of Fisheries, 146. Employment, means of, 1. total amount of, 11. Enemies, — Seals and porpoises sea enemies of salmon, 194. Engines on sea-coast affecting supply, 97. that might be constructed, 229- 232. England, nature of tenure of salmon- fisheries in, 7. law for fisheries pa.ssed in 1861 , 173, 174. English, law of .James i., regulating sale of salmon to, 138. Equalization in price of sea-fish, 218. Esk in Cumberland, stake -nets as affecting fisheries, 130. 240 INDEX. E.sk (South) in Forfarshire, decrease of sahnoii in, 116. Esquimaux, number of salmon eaten by one, 5. Expense of working fisheries de- creased by adoption of recent Acts, 165. Export of salmon from Scotland in olden times, 4. of pickled salmon in olden times, 91 ; from Brora, 96. prohibited at certain times, 176. Exported salmon, value of, in 1862, 177. Eye of parr and salmon (jf similar formation, 36. Facts about the salmon's history that are indisputable, 31. Feeding of young salmon, 49. Female parrs at one time supposed to descend first year, and males the second, 47. Fenton, lines on Durfey and Dryden, 27. ' Fish made to be eaten, IS. Fisheries Preservation Association and Sanitary Association unite in an address to Lord Palmerston, 205. Fishermen never charged with cruelty by objectors to angling, 21. Fixed engines, how they would have been treated by Scotch Bill of 1861, 167 ; question still open, 169. Fixed nets, De.structiveness of, 124, 125, 132. Floods, Supposed influence of. 49. Food, Supply of, 1, 12-14, 215-221. increased by legislative changes, 215. Salmon taken near the sea best for, 149. Forfarshire coast. Stake-nets on, 124. 126. Forth, Salmon in river, in firmer days, 92. Foul fish not to be killed in legal fishing season, 163. Exportation of, 177, 178. France, Pisciculture in, 221, 222. Francis (Francis) on Pisciculture, re- ferred to, 222. Francks (llichard F.) Philanthropu.'^ on names of brood of salmon, 34. on abundance of salmon in Scotland, 91, 92. I »n barbarity of spearing salmon, 161. Fresh waters, our loss by neglecting their preservation, 219. Frightening of fish by stake-nets and white objects, 132, 133. Future salmon legislation, 180-213. Galway, Mr. Ashworth's operations in, 226. Game and landed proprietors com- pared with salmon and fishery pro- prietors, 149. Garonne, Salmon in, known to Roman soldiers, 3. Gay an angler, 27. Glasgow, Salmon in heraldic arms of, 116. Grant of Crown rights to salmon - fisheries, 7. Grayling introduced into Clyde, 223. Grilse, When smolts become, 54 56 ; invariably ascend after smolts have descended, 57. whether an adolescent salmon or a distinct fish ? 63. ascend rivers at a certain perioil, and then all at once, 64. INDEX. 241 Grilse of one year are salmon of sub- sequent years, 75. and salmon always together, 73 ; distinction between, 80. G-rilses "never become salmon," an audacious heresy, 58. Grilse-kelts, 76 ; marked on descent and captured on ascent, 83. Grilse taking, prosperity of, in reports, what it means, 103. Habits of salmon of Tweed, Ness, Spey, and Tay, difference in, 110. "Half-net" of Solway, 187. Hall (Rev. James) on salmon-fisheries about 1805, 94. on salmon-leistering in Aber- deenshire, Banff, and Moray, 161, 162. Hares injure crops, 12. Health, Salmon -fishing good for, 14. Henry iii.. Laws of England on salmon extended to Ireland, 135. Heraldic arms of Glasgow, Salmon in, 116. Highland laird and his gilly in Lon- don hotel, Story about, 96. Hind's Labrador, Salmon facts in, 5. on leistering being prohibited in Labrador, 163. Hogg, the Ettrick Shepherd, on parr being young salmon, 37. Home Drummond's Act, 118, 140, 144 ; Tay- fisheries taken out, 164 ; close-time in, altered, 169. Home Office, Power of, to extend or vary close-time in England, 174. Hume's (Joseph) Bill, 146. Hunt (Henry) a fly-fisher, 29. Hunting and shooting have little or no literature, 28. Ice, Packing of salmon in, when dis- covered, 4. Importance of subject, 1. Impregnation of female adult salmon by milt of male parr, 42. Improvident mercilessness in fishing, 106. Increase of weight in Grilse, 57. Inland districts now supplied with sea-fish, 217, 218. Inland localities polluting rivers, 206. Interest of subject, 1-6 ; of public in preservation of fish, 220. Insect life preserved by the angler, 23. Insufficiency of close -time shown, 154. Inverness, Price of salmon at, in former times, 92. Ireland, Nature of tenure of salmon- fisheries in, 7. Weight of salmon carried by three railways in, 12. Salmon sent from, to London, 97. Stake and bag nets affecting salmon in, 130. Law for fisheries passed in 1862, 175. James i. of Scotland, Act of, regard- ing cruives and yairs, 184. Severe Act of his first Parlia- ment against fishing in forbidden times, 136, 137. Johnson's (Dr.) definition of angler, 18 ; worth of opinion, 25. " Keep," Salmon cost nothing for, 12, Keeper and the angler in conversa- tion, 15. Kennedy (Ptight Hon. T. F.), Com- mittee of 1825 presided over by, 146. Kingdoms of salmon, Great Britain and Ireland, 4, 5. Q 242 INDEX. Kirkcudbright, salmon-fishing in De- foe's days, 92. Knife, sahnon obtained for one in Boothia, 5. Labour of salmon-fishing to a great extent labour lost, 11. Labrador, Salmon in, 89. Lamb, " cruelty" practised before getting a leg of lamb, 19. Legislation on subject, 1 ; preventives and correctives of, G. on salmon, 134-179; future, 180-213. (Modern) proceeds on same principles as ancient, 140 Leister or spear prohibited by Act of Parliament, 160 ; its antiquity, 161 ; prohibited by Canadian Legislature, 163. Leith, Water of, and sewage, 209, 210. Lengthening the fishing season, Dis- astrous effect of, 112. Lights, Fishing with, prohibited, 172. Liver (boiled). Young salmon fed on, 49. Loch (James), Bill of, in 1835, 146. Locksper, local name of young salmon, 85. London, Supply sent to, from Irish fisheries, 97. London Hotel^ Highland laird and his gilly at, 96. Londoners have resolved Thames is not to be a sewer, 268. Longfield, " The Fishery Laws of Ire- laud," 134. Lord Advocate's Bill of 1861, 166; withdrawn, 168. Bill of 1862, 168, 169. Lower or estuary proprietors, 148 ; reply of, to upper proprietors, 148. chiefly want gain, 152. Lower or estuary proprietors on Tweed resist abolition of stell and cairn nets, 159. Macedonians in ancient times were anglers, 2. Mackenzie (Mr.) of Dundonell, his heresy on grilse never becoming salmon, 58-60; answer to, 61-84. Magna Charta, Salmon fisheries re- cognised and regulated in, 7. Two clauses in, about salmon, 135. Male parrs, their premature sexual maturity, 41-48. Mansfield (Earl of) examines fish at Stormontfield, 51. Marked fish, On capture of, 84. Marking by cuts not to be depended on, 54. Maturity (premature sexual) of male parr, 41-43. Mediterranean, no salmon in rivers falling into, 2. Meshes of nets restricted in size by Tweed Bills, 163. minimum size of, in England, 174. Migratory dress, when assumed by parr, 41-53. Monks formerly improved breeds and increased produce, 214. Monteith de Salmonnet, a Scotch- man, 91. Moray Firth, Fixed engines in, 129, 130. fisheries on, made worthless, 201 . Mottled trout not a parr, 39. Mysteries in natural history, study involves, 1. Name of salmon derived from its leap- ing powers, 8. INDEX. 24: Nations desirous of obtaining salmon, 2. Nature of rivers varies, 112. Nature designed rivers not merely for drains, 211. Nelson an enthusiast in fishing, 28. Newby fishery, stake nets as they afiected, 131. Ness and Beauly, Private Bill for, in 1860, 165 ; period for net-fishing now allowed, 171. Ness, Former abundance of salmon in river, 92, 93. Net-and-coble fishing, 120, 122. Net-fishing on Tweed as treated by Committee of 1857, 155, 156. periods for, now allowed, 171. Net-killing not more humane than hook-and-line, 22. Night-leistering on Tweed described, 160 ; on Spey, 162. Nith, Mr. Shaw's experiments with parr from, 39 ; on the temperature of, 48. Non-legislative remedies, 214-284. Norlhern Memoirs of R. Francks quoted, 34. Norway, Abundance of salmon in, 5. OBJECTIONS to the angler's sport an- swered, 18. Objects of Legislature in all the Statutes about salmon, 141. Obstructions on rivers as affecting salmon, 116. of fishing rivers, how treated by English Act of 1861, 173. " Old soldiers" not to be caught, 153. " Orange-fin" or smolt of bull-trout, 81. Ova of salmon only produce parrs, 40. Over- fishing, great cause of decrease in salmon, 120. Pairing of grilse and salmon, On, 81 ; experiment at Stormontfield, 82. Paley's enthusiasm as a fly -fisher, 28. Paris market, Foul salmon smuggled into, 178. Parliamentary returns, 8, 9. Parr, the infant young of salmon, 34. never breed nor have developed — age when it assumes appearance and habits of smolt, 40. — premature sexual maturity of male, 41-43. — two-years' theory regarding migration, 44-52. descent of female and male, 47. Paterson (James), Treatise on Fishery Laws of United Kingdom, 131. Paulin (Mr. William) of Berwick, his doubts and objections, 56. Peaceableness of anglers, 29. Peel's (Sir Robert) remark on salmon bills, 140. Penk, name of young salmon in East of England, 35. Perils to which salmon are liable from earliest stages, 224. Period required to hatch ova of salmon, 41. Perth, salmon-fishery at, in former times, 93. Pheasants and partridges injure crops, 12. Pickled salmon, export of, in olden times, 91 ; from Brora, 96. Pisciculture in France, 221 ; applied to salmon, 227. Plenty of olden times was partial or local, 88. Pliny on salmon, 4. Poacher's time for taking salmon, 152 ; takes the worst fish, 153. Poaching on Tweed diminished, 157. 244 INDEX. Poets' (British) allusions to angling, 25-27. "Poke-net" of Solway, 187. Pollutions in rivers as affecting sal- mon, 116. legislation for, 201. ■ how far prevented in England by Act of 1861, 173. Polwarth's (Lord) expression on salmon being over-fished, 14. Ponds, Mr. Shaw's experiments in, 39 ; stimulating effects of, 50. Pope on fish and angling, 27. Populating rivers with fish, 222. Poyning's law, 136. " Prescription " for the use of fixed engines, how to be treated, 189. Prices, Rise of, 13. of food not diminished, 216. Produce increased by adoption of recent Acts, 165. Productiveness of water, 221. Property in salmon-fisheries ancient, valuable, and marketable, 6, 10. fixed engines as, 180. in fisheries not at owner's dis- posal to make the best of, 142. Protection of salmon in Tay, 109-111. Public, interest of in salmon supply being cared for, 13. Purification of rivers and preserva- tion of fish, 202. Putt, what it was, 158. Quarter- SESSIONS, power of extend- ing or varying close- time in Eng- land, 174. Queensferry, Salmon fishery at, 94. Questions about salmon, 33. Quietness of anglers, 29. Rabbit-warrener and sahnon-fisher compared, 230. Railway system as affecting pollution of rivers, 206. Railways now carry sea-fish to inland districts, 217. " Raise-net" of Solway, 188. Ramsbottom (Mr.), experiments at DoohuUa, in G-alway, 46-56. Range, great in size of salmon, small in size of grilse, 78. Ray and Willoughby quoted, 48. Redd, Fish on, does not take the lure, 152. Redgauntlet, allusions to fixed nets in Solway in, 187, 188. Reformation, Acts about salmon after, 138. Reformation may be wrought, 228. Remedies, non-legislative, 214 234. Rental of fisheries on Tweed, 99-107. on Tay, 107-112. of Tay begins to rise when season for fishing is shortened, 113. Resistance by hooked fish no proof of suffering, 23. Retrenchment, how to be introduced, 209-234. Revenue (recovered) from titles to sea-fishing in Scotland, 199. Rhone, Sir Humphry Davy on angling in the, 28. Richard ii., Acts of, in force till 1861, 135. Richardson on Arctic salmon, 5. Richmond's (Duke of) fisheries on Spey, value of, 9. Right of proprietors to use fixed engines, question treated, 181. Rigour of old Scottish Statutes, 186. Rings, Smolts marked by, 55. River-courses, are they only natural drains? 211. Rivers, are they to be transformed into common sewers ? 205, 207. { INDEX. 245 Rod, Fish spawning not to be taken by, 152. Rod-fishing and the proprietors of salmon-fisheries, 143. on Tweed as dealt with by Com- mittee of 1857, 155-156. period for, now allowed, 171. in English rivers, 174. Roe of salmon, Prohibition of sale and use of, 172. Roman soldiers in Britain eating sal- mon, 3. Romans' demand for salmon, 4. Ross (Sir John) on value of salmon in Boothia, 5. liossii (Salmo), 5. Ross-shire laird on grilse never be- coming salmon, 58. Roxburghe (Duke of) has a grilse which was marked when a smolt, 6. gratitude due to, by anglers and owners of fisheries, 147; his labours, 154, 155. Salmo eriox^ or bull-trout, 71 ; large proportion of, on Tweed, 87. Salmo Rossi i, 5. Salmo salar, or common salmon, 31- 87. Salmon ascend rivers eveiy month of the year, 68. and grilse always together, 73. Saltatory motions of salmon origin of specific name, 3. Salted salmon, export of, from Scot- land, 4. Samlet, name of young salmon in south, 34. Sanitary Associations unite with Fish- eries Preservation Association in an address to Lord Palmerston, 205. Saw-dust noxious to fish in rivers, 203. Scotland exporting in olden times, 4. nature of tenure of salmon fisheries in, 7. Scotch minister and the ploughman, 62. fisheries regulated by Lord Advocate's Bill of 1862, 168. subject, salmon a, 1. Statutes (ancient), 136. Scott's (Sir Walter) term for upper proprietors, 151. Scrope's Letter to Right Hon. T. F. Kennedy, M.P., on parr being young of salmon, 36. Sea, Grilse grow in size and weight in ; salmon taken near, best for food, 149. Sea-coast, the course of the salmon, 123, 124. fishery in Scotland, as granted by Crown, 198. Sea-fish carried by railways into in- land districts, 217. Semi-domestic rearing of salmon, 224. Severity of old Scottish law, 136, 137. Sewage (town) not always fatal to fish, 203. Sewers, are rivers to become common sewers ? 205-207. Sexual maturity of male parrs, 41-43. Shakspeare's allusions to angling, 26. Shaw (Mr.), head-keeper to the Duke of Buccleuch at Drumlanrig Castle, experiments on young salmon, 37- 43. Sheep drains, how they aff'ect ascent of salmon, 114. Shin, in Sutherlandshire, why many grilse are not caught there other- wise than by angling, 72. Shortening the fishing season on Tay, good effect of, 113. 246 INDEX. Silver wire, Tweed smolts marked by means of, 55. Skegger, name of young salmon in west, 35. Smollet on fish in his " Ode to Leven Water," 27. Smolt, Age when parr passes into, 40, 41-53. ■ marking of, 54 ; time when they return as grilse, 56. Solway, close season in, 117 ; stake- nets on Scotch shores of, 130. Scotch, when at war with Eng- lish, might fish at any time in waters of, 137, 138. in olden time left unprotected by law, 186 Spawning fish. Killing of, a cause of decrease, 117. Spear or leister prohibited by Act of Parliament, 160. Spenser's allusions, etc., to angling, 25, 26. Spey fisheries. Value of, 9 ; produce of, 12 ; value of, about 1805, 94. Produce of nine years' fisheries on, 106. fixed engines at mouth of, 129. period for net fishing now al- lowed, 171. Sport, Old and keenly relished, 1 ; salmon good for, 14. Stake and bag net fishing as affecting decrease, 121-129. prohibited in England, 174. first erected on shore of sea, 189. Standing-nets take few sea- trout, 105. Statistics, On reasoning from, 97, 98 ; of Scottish fisheries, 99. Stell-nets dealt with by Tweed Bill of 1857, 154, 159 ; described, 157. Stewart (P. M.) Bill of, in 1835, 146. Stiifness in opinion of the elder anglers, 37. Stimulating effects of ponds on breed- ing of salmon, 50. Stirling — Statutes formerly enforced at, about eating salmon, 92. Stoddart (Mr. Thomas) quoted, 50. Stormontfieldon the Tay, experimental and breeding ponds, 40 ; raising of fish at, 225. St. Lawrence, Salmon in, 89, 90. Suggestion to omniscient authors and witnesses, 33. Supply of salmon, decay in, 88-133. affected by fixed engines on sea-coast, 97. Sutherland, bag-nets on north-west coast, 129. Tay Fisheries, 9 ; produce of, 12. rental of fisheries in river and firth of, 107-112. nature of its bed for fishing, 109. improvement on laws and management affecting fisheries, 112. Navigation Act, 121, 122. proprietors get a local Act in 1858, 164. period for net-fishing now al- lowed, 171. Tecon, local name of young salmon, 35. Temperature of Nith and ponds com- pared, 49. Tenure of salmon- fisheries as pro- perty, 6, 7. Thames now utterly depopulated of salmon, 116. is no longer to be a sewer, 208. Tlieories about parr and salmon, 37. INDEX. 247 Thoinsou's (of Bnnchory) proposal to Dee proprietors, 233. Thurso, private Bill iu 1860 for river, 105. artificial ponds on, 227. Tidal waters, right of fishing in, 7. Title, 345 persons fishing on Scotch sea-coast without, 199. Towns on rivers pollute water, 209. " Travelling condition," period of, in Scotland, 114. Trout, ascent of trout in the Tweed, 68 ; time of spawning, 69 ; bull- trout of, 71. " Trout" of Tweed reports is Salmo eriox, 129. Tumults in Ireland caused by intro- duction of stake and bag nets, 180. Tweed, experiments on smolts in, 66. proportions of salmon, grilse, and trout taken in net-fisheries, 65. rental of fisheries on, 99-107. nature of its bed for fishing, 1 09 ; salmon in regarded as spoil, 111. long and late fishing on, 118 ; Act prohibits "bar-nets," 126. — Scotch when at war with Eng- lish might fish at any time in, 137, 138 ; close-time on, 154. differing from other rivers as a salmon range, 156. — stake and bag nets on, not abo- lished by Bill of 1859, 160. — woollen manufactories affecting purity of, 207. salmon, chances of a, 230. Two-years' theory regarding migra- tion of parr, 44, 52. Tyne, Salmon in, much reduced in numbers, 116. Uniform machinery only must be employed, 142. Upper proprietors. Victories of, 143 ; interests of them and lower pro- prietors identical, 147. chiefly want sport, 151. Value of salmon fisheries in Ireland, 8 ; in Scotland, 9. average) to upper and lower proprietors, 152. Vegetarians on cruelty, 19. Voluntary closing of fishing season, 145. Wallace of Kelly, Bill stopping net- fishing on 24th August, 146. Walton (Izaak) a good man, 24. on experiments made in his days on young salmon, 35 ; knew parrs were only found in salmon rivers, 38 ; erroneous observation when salmon are best, 149. Water more productive than land, 221. Water of Leith and sewage, 209, 210. Water-poaching on Tweed, 111. Weavers of Hawick, Selkirk, and Galashiels, water-poachers. 111. Weddel (Robert) on the stell-net, 157. Weekly close-time as now extended, 171. Weight of grilse. Increase in, 57. in different months, 75 ; argu- ment from weight, 79. Westbury (Lord Chancellor) on prin- ciples of salmon legislation, 141. Wharfe (river), in Yorkshire, Experi- ments on salmon in, 47. Whitadder, Kelts marked at mouth of, 84. Wholesome, When salmon are most, 149. 248 INDEX. Wilson (Mr. James) examines fish at Stormontfield, 51. article in Blackwood on "What's a Parr?" 62. article " Ichthyology," in En- cyclopcedia Britannica, 62. on early killing of salmon, 104. Women sometimes keen anglers, 29. Woollen manufactories on Tweed pol- lute water, 207. Wordsworth fond of fly-fishing and fly-fishermen, 27. Yairs and cruives, 183. Year when parr migrates, 43-53. Young of Invershin on parr as " river- trout," 38. on parr descending shortly after expiry of first year, 46. Ythan in Aberdeenshire, Rev. James Hall's story of two proprietors, 4%: A ■ ERRATUM. Page 48, line 2, for Rae read Ray. KDINBOKGH : T CONSTABLE, rRI.NTER TO THE QI'KEN, ANP TO THK I'MVERSITY /;/ One Vol. Zvo, ivith Illustrations. FOREST SKETCHES DEER -STALKING AND OTHER SPORTS IN THE HIGHLANDS FIFTY YEARS AGO Which is he that killed the deer? Sir, it was I. AS YOU LIKE IT. EDINBURGH : EDMONSTON & DOUGLAS MDCCCLXV /// Tivo Vols. Zvo, price 24s. LIFE IN NORMANDY SKETCHES OF FRENCH FISHING FARMING, COOKING, NATURAL HISTORY AND POLITICS '^- DRA WN FROM — ^ ■ •''"^ EDINBURGH : EDMONSTON & DOUGLAS M D C C C L X 1 1 1 In One Vol. 8vo, price Zs. 6d. NATUEAL HISTOKY & SPORT IN MORAY COLLECTED FROM THE JOURNALS AND LETTERS OF THE LATE CHARLES ST. JOHN AUTHOH OF ' WILD SPORTS OF THE HIGHLANDS EDINBURGH: EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS MDCCCLXIII /;/ One Vol, ^vo, price i6s. MY INDIAN JOUKNAL COLONEL WALTER CAMPBELL AUTHOR OF ' THE OLD FOREST RANGER ' SKIPNESS CASTLE. EDINBURGH: EDMONSTON & DOUGLAS MDCCCLXrV In One Vol. ?>vo, price I2s. A SHORT AMERICAN TRAMP IN THE FALL OF 1864 BY THE EDITOR OF 'LIFE IN NORMANDY' EDINBURGH: EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS MDCCCLXV Price 6d. each. ODD S AND E N D S. No. 1. Sketches of Highland Character. SHEEP FARMERS AND DROVERS. rtUJAMSON ' ' But the queys was goot.' EDINBURGH EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS 1865. Nearly ready, in Tivo Vols. 8z>o, zvith mnneroiis Illustrations, FKOST & FIEE NATURAL ENGINES, TOOL-MARKS & CHIPS WITH SKETCHES DRAWN" AT HOME AND ABEOAD BY A TRAVELLER EDINBURGH EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS MDCCCLXV /;/ FoiLT Vols, small Zvo, price 32^'. Popular Tales of the West Highlands ORALLY COLLECTED BY J. F. CAMPBELL. EDINBURGH : EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS. 1862. Subscription 24s. per annum, sent Free by Post. NEW SERIES. CONTENTS OF Nos. 78 to 82, see Page 6. Vols. I. and II. now ready, Price 12s. each. Title-pages for the New Series supplied on aj^plication. OPINIONS OF THE PRESS IN 1864. PAGE COURANT . . 1 SCOTSMAN \ . . 3 SUN .... 3 SATURDAY REVIEW 4 TIMES, . . 5 Prom THE EDINBURGH COURANT, September 3, 1864. The Nokth British Eeview. No. LXXXI. — The histoiy of the JVorth British Review since its commencement in 1844 is to some extent the history of religious thought in Scotland during the same period. Originally started by Dr. Chalmers to repre- sent and vindicate that enlightened Christianity which the Edinhurgh Reviciv had always regarded somewhat distantly, it was far from being in any sense a "religious organ" or tram- melled by the tenets of any particular sect. Indeed, it is well known that among the writers whom its illustrious founder was most anxious to secure as contributors to its pages were Mr. Thomas Carlyle and Mr. J. D. Morell. Under the congenial editorship of Dr. Ilanna and Professor Eraser the North British Review carried out to the utmost limit the programme of its founder. Eeligious questions were discussed with a freshness 2 The Courant I^ewspaper on and power which were never hampered by timidity, and were never wanting in the reverential spirit. Writers of the highest mark contributed articles in their happiest style. Stanley Conington, Isaac Taylor, Herbert Spencer, Kingsley, Freeman, Mansel, Senior, De Morgan, are a few among many names which gave it a wide and authoritative circulation, not only among all religious parties in Scotland, but even in England and the Colonies. The very breadth and freedom of its style of discus- sion, however, gave offence to the less scholarly and philosophi- cal adherents of that sect of which Dr. Chalmers had been the acknowledged leader ; and, accordingly, some seven years ago, a change was effected in its management, by which it assumed a character more congenial to what is called (rightly or wrongly) the " evangelical" party in the religious world. Im- mediately, in almost every department of literature, philosophy, and science, it betrayed a falling off; less than four years suf- ficed to divest it of nearly all the charm and authority it formerly had for its numerous readers at home and abroad ; till at length, in 1861, it had again to undergo a change of manage ment. This change was made in conformity with the growth of a more liberal spirit even among the sect which had weU- nigh wrought its ruin ; and, accordingly, the style of its articles on religious subjects came to be marked by a more genial and scholarly tone than it had been conscious of since 1857. Still, there was great room for further improvement ; and the Reviciv has once more been transferred to a new management, which, we hope, and indeed expect, will at length be the final one. Under its present auspices, the North British Review has swung round as nearly as possible to the point from which, twenty years ago, it was first projected. On the whole, its style ex- hibits the same manliness and freedom which are characteristic of everything charged with the genuine spirit of its founder ; and although its recent numbers have contained articles some- times provincial in tone, sometimes even vulgar in conception and treatment, still these are faults which are gradually dis- appearing from its pages in proportion as its contributors are selected from a less and less local area. " Wordsworth : the Man and the Poet" is incomparably the best article in the present number ; and its conclusions may be accepted as those of the most competent and refined critics of The North British Review. 3 the author of the " Excursion." It is the ablest contribution to the apparatus criticus of the poet since Henry Taylor's cele- brated article, the publication of which, thirty years ago, in the Quarterly Bcviciv, marks the point at which the hostility of Jeffrey and his school was silenced for ever. Prom THE SCOTSMAN, June 2, 1864. No. LXXX. — AVith topics fresh and interesting, and able writers, obviously left, as such writers ought to be left, to the freedom of their own thoughts and styles, this is an admii'able number of the North British, and would be an admirable number of any of the Quarterlies of older fame and once of richer re- sources. Especially, it is pleasant to perceive that there is no chance of the North British dying of dignity — a malady which has brought one, at least, of its brethren into a somnolent, if not a moribund, condition. It is not content and proud to dwell either in decencies or in dulnesses for ever ; and when it can set forth good sense or sound learning with humour or wit, or even " fun," it is neither ashamed nor afraid to make sport for its readers. Something like a combined effort has been made of late years to convince the " reading public" that dulness is an equivalent of wisdom, and that, as Quarterlies are the natural, if not sole repositories of wisdom, they fulfil the pur- pose of their being in filling themselves with dulness. It was not so in the earlier and better days of Quarterlyism, when Sydney Smith joked wisely and Lockhart jeered too well ; and a little retrogression in this matter would be better than the sort of progress we have been lately making. A very good instance of how not only buoyant but royster- ing humour can be united with solid facts and wise instruction, is supplied by the article called " A Fortnight in Faroe." The writer has new and strange things to tell, and he tells them well — fine scenes to paint, and he paints them with a vigorous brush ; but he is in violent animal spirits all the while, enjoy- ing his work immensely, and giving you a chance of enjoying it too, a chance all the more likely to be accepted that he ob- viously does not care whether you take it or leave it. 4 The Saturday Revieiv on From THE SUN, February 20, 1864. Although several articles of importance lend an especial interest to the current number of the North British Review — • conspicuous among them a reverential treatise upon the " Vie de Jesus," such as will hardly satisfy the egotism of M. Eenan should it fall under his observation — we have turned, as we conjecture every person taking up this ever welcome blue- covered northern Quarterly will turn, must perforce turn, in- stinctively, inevitably, to the last paper of all — the eighth — simply entitled " Thackeray." Of all the many memorials of Thackeray yet given to the eager multitude of his lamenting admirers since his startling demise, this paper in the North British is, to our mind, incomparably the very best. From THE SATURDAY REVIEW, August 20, 1864. " Salt of Society." — A slight sketch of the private life of Lord Elgin, written with great feeling and excellent taste, has lately been published in the North British Revieiv. The writer only gives an outline of Lord Elgin's public career, and leaves it to others to paint the varied scenes of diplomatic life through which the late Governor-General passed in his career of labour and enterprise. Some day the narrative of this career will be written, and if it is but well done, it ought to be full of interest and instruction. It is of Lord Elgin as he was known to his family and familiar friends that the article in the North British Review treats ; more especially it gives a record of his last days, after the fatal disease which terminated his life had displayed itself, and while he was waiting for his release. He ended his days as a sober, courageous, religious man should end them, devoted in his affection to all around him, anxious to lessen their sorrow, forgetful of himself, and resigned to the will of God. From THE SATURDAY REVIEW, October 22, 1864. "The Two Sides of Criticism." — As a specimen of sympathetic criticism, we may take the elaborate and admirable criticism of " Wordsworth," which has lately appeared in the pages of the The North British Review. North British Review, and which gives in a moderate compass all that an ardent and yet sensible admirer of Wordsworth has to say about his favourite poet. ... On the whole, this essay is one of the best specimens of sympathetic criticism that can easily be found, and has much that is new and delightful in it even to very old readers of Wordsworth. We get a very different, and a much fuller and truer notion of Wordsworth from it than that which Lord Jeffrey gives us, but the two together give a juster notion than either separately. From THE TIMES. It is not often that we step out of our way to review a Review, but the present occasion encourages the experiment, and many of our readers will thank us for pointing to the rise of a new luminary. The first star of this series arose in a northern latitude, when the last generation rejoiced in the beams of the old Editiburgh. Why do such reviews pale and degenerate when they come into southern lands ? Have we still lessons to learn from the brood of the " caller air ?" Is there strange virtue in oat-cake, — or what is the secret ? The fact is that the northern " wut" is combined with a canny sense of the necessities of our state, and with a strong impulse to positive progress. Thus Logarithms and Steam-Engines and Wealth of Nations have come out of strenuous Scottish brains, and we witness now a new phenomenon in a fresh development of their critical power. Of course, we are not vain enough to ascribe their superiority to the fact that possibly they avail themselves more freely than formerly of the products of English contributors. At all events, we hall the recent numbers of the North British as a sign of their advance, and a proof that a true Scot is as ready as ever to cross the Tweed and to vie successfully with his English competitors. It is seldom, if ever, that one sees so good a series of reviews — so good substantially in nearly all their articles, from the first page to the last. It is sensible on all its subjects, as distinguished from literary persiflage, — a true whistle from the oaten straw which it is ever bracing to our nerves to hearken to. CONTENTS OF Nos. LXXVIIL to LXXXIL No. LXXVIII. 1. On the Ancient Glaciers and Icebergs of Scotland. 2. The Seafoi-th Papers. 3. On Recent Geographical Discovery and Research. 4. Pet Marjorie. 5. Clerical Subscription in the Church of England. 6. A Voyage to Alexandria and a Glimpse of Egypt. 7. The Scotch Universities' Commission. 8. Northern Studies— Harold Hardrada and Magnus the Good. 9. England and Europe. No. LXXIX. 1. The Country Life of England. 2. The Dynamical Theory of Heat. 3. " Bibliomania." 4. Harold Hardrada, King of Norway. 5. The later Roman Epic — Statins' Thebaid, 6. Kilmahoe : a Highland Pastoral. 7. Renan — " Vie de Jesus." 8. Thackeray. No. LXXX. 1. Lord Elgin — Tn Memoriam. 2. A Fortnight in Faroe. 3. Energy. 4. Mr. Trollope's Novels. 5. Day Dreams of a Schoolmaster. 6. Christian Missions. 7. The Old Anglo-Scottish Dialect. 8. Rambles in the Deserts of Syria. 9. Sporting Boolcs. 10. Our Foreign Policy. No. LXXXI. 1. Wordsworth : the Man and the Poet. 2. Todlel>en's History of the Crimean War. 3. Ne\vman's Apologia pro Vita Sua. 4. Education at Public Schools. 5. Russia under Alexander ii. 6. The Scotch Lawyer of the Seventeenth Century. 7. Berkeley's Theory of Vision. 8. Tennyson's Enoch Arden, etc. No. LXXXII. 1 . Commercial Philanthropy. 2. Latham's Johnson's Dictionary. 3. Liturgical Reform in the Church of England. 4. Early Roman Tragedy and Epic Poetiy 5. Wildbad and its Water. 6. Giuseppe Giusti and his Times. 7. The late John Richardson. NEW PUBLICATIONS. A SHORT AMERICAN TRAMP in the FALL of 1864. By the Editor of " Life in Normandy." In One Vol. 8vo. Price 12s. TRAVELS BY UMBRA, in One Vol. 8vo. Price 10s. 6d. III. FOREST SKETCHES : Deer Stalking and other Sports in tlie Hi2;lilands Fifty Years ago. With Illustrations by Gouulay Steell, U.S.A. In One Vol. 8vo. FROST AND FIRE, NATURAL ENGINES, TOOL- MARKS, AND CHIPS. With Sketches drawn at Home and Abroad by a Traveller. In Two Vols. 8vo, with Maps and numerous Illustrations on Wood. \_Nearly Beady. V. THE SALMON : Its History, Position, and Prospects, ^y Alex. Eussel. 1 Vol. Demy Svo, 7s. 6d. " "We take s]ianie to ourselves for having left tliis amusing and exhaustive book on the history, practice, and legislation of salmon Ashing so long unnoticed. Its author, well known all over Great Britain as editor of the Scotsnunii, and in ScotlaiKl as one of tlie most indefatigable and success- ful of fishermen, has brought the skill gained in the one craft and the knowledge acquired in the other to bear upon a single subject, and has consequently produced a book as full of argument and evidence as a 'year book,' and rather more readable thtm ordinary novels." — Spectator. MY INDIAN JOURNAL. By Colonel Walter Campbell, Author of " The Old Forest Ranger." 8vo, with Illustrations, 16s. " We know no book of Indian life which combines more thoroughly real experience and sound sense with racy description and keen mother wit." — Saturdanj. Review LIFE IN NORMANDY : 'sketches of French Fishing, Farming, Cooking, Natural History, and Politics, drawn from Nature. By an English Residknt. Second Edition, 2 Vols. Svo, with Maps and numerous Illustrations^ 24s. VIII. THE EARLIER YEARS OF OUR LORD'S LIFE ON EARTH. By the Rev. Williaii Hanna, D.D., LL.D. In One Vol. Fcap. Svo, price 5s. IX. BY THE SAME AUTHOR. The FORTY DAYS AFTER OUR LORD'S RESURREC- TION. One Vol. Extra Fcap. Svo, price 5s. cloth. THE LAST DAY OF OUR LORD'S PASSION. 13th Edition. One Vol. Extra Fcap. Svo, price 5s. XI. A PEOPLE'S EDITION OF DEAN RAMSAY'S REMI- NISCENCES OF SCOTTISH LIFE AND CHARACTER. Fcap. Svo, Boards, price Is. 6d. xn. COUSIN KATE. AUNT AILIE : A Story for Young People. By the late CATHERINE D. BELL, Author of " Cousin Kate's Story." New and Cheaper Edition, price 3s. 6d. Edinburgh : EDMONSTON & DOUGLAS, 88, Pbinces Stkeet. Second Edition. Now ready, in One Vol, Fcap. 8vo, Price 5s. DAY DREAMS OF A SCHOOLMASTER. By D'ARCY W. THOMPSON, Professor of Greek in Queen's College, Galway. " This book has everything to recommend it to the general reader. It consists ot upwards of a score of short essays, written in a style of genial humour, sharp, but never ill-natured satire, ripe scholarship, and occasionally of unaffected pathos, which makes it one of the most readable books that have fallen in our way for a long time. It is i-eadable from the very best point of view — viz., imp'irtance of subject and ability of handling. It contains much that ought to be read by everybody, and is written in a style that everybody will read with pleasure. " We have read the book with the greatest satisfaction, and hope it is only the pre cursor of another such. It is rare indeed to meet with an author who so happily com- bines the elements of laughter and tears ; so full of scholarship, without an atom of its pedantry ; so genial, yet with so keen an eye for humbug and sham ; so full of the manliness we admire in a man, and the tenderness we love in a woman." — Reader. " We advise our readers to make early acquaintance with these Day Dreams. Learning and philosophy have seldom put on a more attractive garb ; nor have we ever felt more convinced than by Mr. Thompson's arguments that erudition, however necessary, is the least part of a teacher's qualifications." — Athenceum. " Our Schoolmaster is no ordinary dreamer; neither is our Day-dreamer an ordinary schoolmaster. It is not often that we find members of the scholastic profession making contributions to real literature, such as the volume before us. For in spite of a good deal of what we must take leave to call mannerism, there can be no doubt about Mr. D'Arcy Thompson's genuine literary power. And the mannerism, in this case, really belongs to the man. It is part of his individuality. It is not, we believe, a mere artifice of style, — the toggery of office assumed for the name. It is of the writer's essence, and therefore can be called mannerism only in a limited sense. The book is full of this strong personal flavour. We are sometimes tempted, while we read, to call it egotism ; but the term would be apt to mislead, for it is that natural, unconscious egotism, which springs from honest earnestness of character, and is therefore void of offence. We have said so much to indicate the general character of the work. Educa- tion, in all its aspects and phases, is its subject ; but it does not belong to educational literature merely. It takes a much wider range, and deserves a much higher place. At times you think you are reading an autobiography ; at others, a history of school systems; at others, a philosophy of education. The manner in which these various elements are blended renders the book a remarkable one. It is a book to be read by parents fully as much as by schoolmasters. It is full of sound sense and originality ; and there is nothing more original in it than its vein of poetic sentiment, and its telling touches of caustic humour," — Museum. Edinburgh : EDMONSTON & DOUGLAS, 88, Princes Street. 88 Princes Street, Edinlnirgh. EDMONSTON & DOUGLAS' LIST OF WORKS -oOo- Memoir of Lieutenant-General Sir Ralph Abercromby, K.B., 1793-1801. By his Son JAMES LORD DUNFERMLINE. Svo, price 10s. 6d. Essays and Tracts : The Culture and Discipline of the Mind, and other Essays. By JOHN ABER- CROMBIE, M.D., Late First Physician to the Queen for Scotland. New Edition. Fcap. Svo, cloth, 3s. 6d. A Few "Words on Clerical Subscription in the Church of England. Reprinted with Alterations and Additions from the ' North British Review.' By Viscount AMBERLEY. Svo, price Is. (id. Odal Eights and Feudal Wrongs : A Memorial for Orkney. By DAVID BALFOUR of Balfour and Trenaby. Svo, price 6s. Bible Readings. l'2mo, cloth, 2s. Aunt Ailie. Second Edition. By CATHARINE D. BELL, Author of ' Cousin Kate's Story,' ' Margaret Cecil,' etc. Fcap. Svo, cloth, 3s. 6d. The Diary of Three Children ; Or, Fifty-two Saturdays. Edited by CATHARINE D. BELL. Fcap. Svo, 5s. Now or Never, A Novel, By M. BETHAM EDWARDS, Author of ' The White House by the Sea. Crown Svo, 10s. 6d. Charlie and Ernest ; or. Play and Work. A Story of Hazlehurst School, with Four Illustrations by J. D. By M. BETHAM EDWARDS. Royal 16mo, 3s. 6d. EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS, British Birds drawn from Nature. By Mrs. BLACKBURN. (J. B.) Folio, price 10s. 6d. India Proofs, 21s. On Beauty. Three Discourses delivered in the University of Edinburgh, with an' Exposition of the Doctrine of the Beautiful according to Plato. By J. S. BLACKIE, Professor of Greek in the University, and of Ancient Literature to the Royal Scottish Academy, Edinburgh. Crown 8vo, cloth, 8s. 6d. Lyrical Poems. By J. S. BLACKIE. Cro%vn Svo, cloth, 7s. 6d. On Greek Pronunciation. By J. S. BLACKIE. Demy Svo, 3s. 6d. Memoirs of the Life, Writings, and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Xewton. By Sir DAVID BREWSTER, K.H., A.M., LL.D., D.C.L., F.R.S., etc., etc. With Portraits. New and. Cheaper Edition, 2 vols., feap. Svo, cloth, 12s. Works by Margaret Maria Gordon (nee Brewster). Ijady Elinor Mordaunt ; or, Sunbeams in the Castle. Crown Svo, cloth, 9s. Letters from Cannes and Nice, Illustrated by a Lady. Svo, cloth, 12s. Work ; or. Plenty to do and How to do it. Thirty-third thousand. Pcap. Svo, cloth, 2s. 6d. Little Millie and her Four Places. Cheap Edition. Forty-sixth thousand. Limp cloth. Is. Sunbeams in the Cottage ; or, W^hat Women may do. A narrative chiefly ad- dressed to the Working Classes. Cheap Edition. Thirty-ninth thousand. Limp cloth, Is. Prevention ; or, An Appeal to Economy and Common Sense. Svo, 6d. The Word and the World. Price 2d. TiEAVES OF Healing for the Sick and Sorrowful. Fcap. 4to, cloth, 3s. 6d, ClieaiJ Edition, limp cloth, 2s. The ^Motherless Boy ; with an Illustration by J. Noel Paton, R.S.A. Cheap Edition, limp cloth. Is. The Vision of Prophecy, and other Poems. By the Rev. JAMES D. BURNS, M.A. Second Edition, fcap. Svo, cloth, t!s. Memoirs of John Brown, D.D. By the Rev. J. CAIRNS, D.D., Berwick, with Supplementary Chapter by his Son, .John Brown, M.D. Fcap. Svo, cloth, 9s. 6d. Works by John Brown, M.D., F.R.S.E. HoR^ SuBSEciv^. Fifth Edition, in 1 voL fcap. Svo, price 6s. Letter to the Rev. John Cairns, D.D. Second Edition, crown Svo, sewed, 2s. Arthur H. Hallam ; Extracted from ' Horce Subsecivre.' Fcap. sewed, 2s. ; cloth, 2s. 6d. Rab and his Friends ; Extracted from ' Hora Subsecivse.' Forty-fourth thousand. Feap. sewed, 6d. Mabjorie Fleming : A Sketch. Fifteenth thousand. Fcap. sewed, 6d. 88 PRINCES STREET, EDINBURGH. "Works by John Brown— continued. Our Dogs; Extracted from 'Horse Subseeivaj.' Sevuiiteenth thousand. Fcap. sewed, 6d. Rab and his Friends. With Illustrations by George Harvey, R.S.A., J. Ncjel Paton, B.S.A., and J. B. New Edition, small quarto, cloth, price 3s. Gd. "With Brains, Sir ;" Extracted from 'Horse Subsecivje.' Fcap. sewed, (id. MiNCHMooR. Fcap. sewed, 6d. Jeems the Doorkeeper : A Lay Sermon. Price (id. Lectiires on the Atomic Theory, and Essays, Scientific and Literary. By SAMUEL BROWN. 2 vols., crown Svo, cloth, 15s. The Biography of Samson. Ilhi.strated and Applied. By the Rev. JOHN BRUCE, D.D., Minister of Fi-ee St. Andrew's Church, Edinburgh. Second Edition. ISmo, cloth, 2s. Catholicism and Sectarianism. A Plea for Christian Union. By Rev. ISLAY BURNS, D.D., M.A. Svo, price Is. Catalogue of Antiquities, Works of Art, and Historical Scottish Relies, exhibiteil in the Museum of the Archai'.ological Institute uf Great Britain and Ireland during their Annual Meeting held in Edinburgh, July ISotJ. Svo, Illustrated, price 31s. False Christs and' the True; Or, The Gospel History maintained in answer to Strauss and Renan. A Sermon preached before the National Bible Society of Scotland. By the Rev. JOHN CAIRNS, D.D., Berwick-on-Tweed. Svo, price Is. My Indian Journal, Containing descriptions of the principal Field Sports of India, with Notes on tlie Natural History and Habits of the Wild Animals of the Country — a visit to tlie Neilgherry Hills, and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. By Colonel WALTER CAMPBELL, author of ' The Old Forest Ranger.' Svo, with Illustrations, price Itis. Popular Tales of the West Highlands, Orally Collected, with a translation by J. F. CAMPBELL. ■ 4 vols., extra fcap., cloth, 32s. Book-keeping, Adapted to Commercial and Judicial Accounting, giviiig Systems of Book-keeping, for Lawyers, Factors and Curators, Wliolesale and Retail Traders, Newspaiiers, Insurance Offices, and Private House-keeping, etc. ByF. H. CARTER, C. A. Svo, cloth, price 10s. Characteristics of Old Church Architecture, etc.. In the Mainland and Western Islands of Scotland. 4to, with Illustrations, jirife 256. Ballads from Scottish History. By NORVAL CLYNE. Fcap. Svo, price 6s. " EDMONSTON AKD DOUGLAS, Life and Works of Rev. Thomas Chalmers, D.D., LLJD. Memoirs of the Rev. Thomas Chalmers. By Rev. W. Hanna, D.D., LL.D. vols., Svo, cloth, £2 : 2s. ■ Cheap Edition, 2 vols., crown Svo, cloth, 12s. A Selection from the Correspondence of De. Chalmers, uniform with the Memoirs. Crown Svo, cloth, 10s. 6d. Posthumous Works, 9 vols., Svo — Daily Scripture Readings. 3 vols., £1:11:6. Sabbath Scripture Readings. 2 vols., £1 : Is. Sermons. 1 vol., 10s. 6d. Institutes of Theology. 2 vols., £1 : Is. Prelections on Butler's Analogy, etc. 1 vol. , 10s. 6d. Sabbath Scripture Readings. Cheap Edition, 2 vols., crown Svo, 10s. Daily Scripture Readings. Cheap Edition, 2 vols., crown Svo, 10s. Astronomical Discourses. Crown Svo, cloth, 2s. 6d. Cheap Edition, limp. Is. Commercial Discourses. Cheap Edition, limp. Is. Lectures on the Romans. 2 vols., crown Svo, 12s. Institutes of Theology. 2 vols., crown Svo, 12s. Political Economy. Crown Svo, 6s. Select Works, in 12 vols., crown Svo, cloth, per vol., 6s. Vols. I. and II. — Lectures on the Romans, 2 vols. Vols. III. and IV. — Sermons, 2 vols. Vol. V. — Natural Theology, Lectures on Butler's Analogy, etc. Vol. VI. — Christian Evidences, Lectures on Paley's Evidences, etc. Vols. VII. and VIII.— Institutes of Theology, 2 vols. Vol. IX. — Political Economy ; with Cognate Essays. Vol. X.— Polity of a Nation. Vol. XI. — Church and College Establishments. Vol. XII. — Moral Philosophy, Introductory Essays, Index, etc. " Christopher Worth ;" A Memoir of Jolm Wilson, late Professor of Moral Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh. Compiled from Family Papers and other sources, by his daughter, Mrs. GORDON. Third Thousand. In 2 vols., crown Svo, price 24s., with Por- trait, and graphic Illustrations. Chronicle of G-udrun ; A Story of the North Sea. From the medieval German. By EMMA LETHER- BROW. With frontispiece by J. Noel Pa ton, R.S.A. New Edition for Young People, price 5s. Of the Light of Nature, A Discourse by NATHANIEL CULVERWELL, M.A. Edited by John Brown, D.D., with a critical Essay on the Discourse by John Cairns, D.D. Svo, cloth, 12s. The Annals of the University of Edinburgh- By ANDREW DALZEL, formerly Professor of Greek in the University of Edin- burgh ; with a Memoir of the Compiler, and Portrait after Raebum. In 2 vols, demy Svo, price 21s. 88 PKmCES STEEET, EDINBURGH. The Story of Burnt Kjal ; Or, Life in leelancl at the end of the Tenth Century. From the Icelandic of the Njals Saga. By GEORGE WEBBE DASENT, D.C.L. In 2 vols. 8vo, \vlth Maps and Plans, price 28s. Popular Tales from the Norse, With an Introductorj' Essay on the origin and diffusion of Popular Tales. Second Edition, enlarged. By GEORGE WeIbBE DASENT, D.C.L. Crown Svo, 10s. 6d. Select Popular Tales from the Norse. For the use of Young People. By G. W. DASENT, D.C.L. New Edition, with Illustrations. Crown Svo, 6s. The Fifty Years' Struggle of the Scottish Covenanters, 163S-SS. By JAMES DODDS. Third Edition, fcap., cloth, 5s. From London to Nice. A Journey through France, and Winter in the Sunny South. By Rev. \V. B. DUNBAR, of Glencairn. 12nio, cloth, price 3s. Veterinary Medicines ; their Actions and Uses. By FINLAY DUN. Third Edition, revised and enlarged. Svo, price 12s. The Ferry Hills, A Poem in Three Cantos. 12mo, price 2s. 6d. L'Histoire d'Angleterre, Racontee k la Jeunesse, augmentee d'une table analitique. Par M. LAME PLEURT, Auteur de plusieurs ouvrages d' education. ISmo, cloth, 2s. 6d. L'Histoire de France, Racontee i la Jeunesse. Par M. LAME FLEURY. ISmo, cloth, 2s. 6d. Christianity viewed in some of its Leading Aspects. By Rev. A. L. R. FOOTE, Author of 'Incidents in the Life of our Saviour.' Fcap., cloth, 3s. Frost and Fire ; Natural Engines, Tool-Marks, and Chips, with Sketches drawn at Home and Abroad by a Traveller. In 2 vols. Svo, with Maps and numerous Illustrations on Wood. Fragments of Truth, Being the Exposition of several passages of Scripture. Third Edition. Fcap, Svo, cloth, price 5s. Clinical Medicine. Observations recorded at the Bedside, with Commentaries. By W. T. GAIRDNER, M.D., Professor of the Practice of Physic in the University of Glasgow. Svo, 742 pp., with numerous Engravings on wood, 12s. 6d. Medicine and Medical Education. Three Lectures, with Notes and Appendix. By W. T. GAIRDNER, M.D., Profes- sor of the Practice of Physic in the University of Glasgow. 12mo, cloth, price 2s. 6d. EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS, Clinical and Pathological Wotes on Pericarditis. By W. T. GAIRDNER, M.D., Professor of the Practice of Phj-sic in the University of Glasgow. Svo, sewed, price Is. The Giants, the Knights, and the Princess Verbena. A Fairy Story, with Illustrations by Hcnkil Phranc. 4to, boards, 2s. 6d. An Ecclesiastical History of Scotland, From the Introduction of Christianity to the Present Time. By GEORGE GRUB, A. M. In 4 vols. Svo, 42s. Fine Paper Copies, 62s. 6d. The Earlier Years of onr Lord's Life on Earth. By the Rev. WILLIAM HANNA, D.D., LL.D. Extra fcap. Svo, price 5s The Last Day of our Lord's Passion. By the Rev. WILLIAM HANNA, D.D., LL.D. Fourteenth Edition, extra fcap. Svo, jirice as. The Forty Days after our Lord's Resurrection. By the Rev. WILLIAM HANNA, D.D., LL.D. Extra fcap. Svo, price 5s. The Healing Art, the Eight Hand of the Church ; Or, Practical Medicine an Essential Element in the Christian System. Crown Svo, cloth, price 5s. Highland Sports. Forest Sketches; Deerstalking and other Sports in the Highlands Fifty Years Ago. With Illustrations by Gourlay Steel, R. S. A. In 1 vol. Svo. Notes of a Cruise of H.M.S. 'Fawn' In the Western Pacific in the year 18G2. By T. H. HOOD. Demy Svo, with numerous Illustrations from Photographs, price 15s. Homely Hints from the Fireside. By the author of 'Little Things.' Cheap Edition, limp cloth, Is. A Century of Despotism in Naples and Sicily, 1759-1859. By Miss SUSAN HORNER, translator of 'Colletas Naples.' Fcap., cloth, 2s. Od. Herroinius. A Romance. By I. K S. In 1 vol. fcap. Svo, price 6s. Sketches of Early Scotch History. By COSJIO INNES, F.S.A., Professor of History in the University of Edinburgh. 1. The Church ; its Old Organisation, Parochial and Monastic. 2. Universities. 3. Family History. Svo, price Itis. \ Concerning some Scotch Surnames. By COSMO INNES, F.S.A., Professor of History in the University of Edinburgh. 1 vol., small 4to, cloth antique, 5s. Illustrations of Scripture. Photographs from Drawings by J. B. With Notes by a Naturalist. Oblong folio, 42s. Death Scenes of Scottish Martyrs. By HENRY INGLIS. Square 12mo, cloth, price 6s. ^ 88 PKmCES STREET, EDINBURGH. Instructive Pictvire Books. Polio, 10s. 6d. each. The Instructive Picture Book. A few Attractive Lessons from the Natural History of Animals. By ADAM WHITE, Assistant, Zoological Department, British Museum. With 58 folio coloured Plates. Fifth Edition, containing many new Illustrations by J. B., J. Stewart, and oUtffi-s. llf The Instructive Picture Book. Lessons from the Vegetable World. By the Author of 'Tlie Heir of Redelift'e,' 'Tlie Herb of the Field,' etc. Arranged by Robert M. Stark, Edinburgh. New Edition, with many New Plates. The New Picture Book. Pictorial Lessons on Form, Comparison, and Number, for Children under Seven Years of Age. With Explanations by NICHOLAS BOHNY. 36 oblong folio, coloured Illustrations. Price 10s. 6d. The History of Scottish Poetry, From the Middle Ages to the Close of the Seventeenth Century. By the late DAVID IRVING, LL.D. Edited by John Aitken Carlyle, M.D. With a Memoir and Glossary. Demy Svo, Itis. The Circle of Christian Doctrine ; A Handbook of Faitli, framed out of a Layman's experience. By Lord KINLOCH, one of the Judges of the Supreme Court of Scotland. Third and Cheaper Edition. Fcap. Svo. Time's Treasure ; Or, Devout Thoughts for every Day of the Year. Expressed in verse. By Lord KINLOCH. Second Edition. Fcap. Svo, price 6s. The Mineral Kingdom, With Coloured Illustrations of the most important Minerals, Rocks, and Petri- factions. By Dr. J. G. KURR, Professor of Natural History in the Polytechnic Institution of Stuttgart. Folio, half-bound, 31s. 6d. Recent Forms of Unbelief. Some account of Renan's ' Vie de Jesus.' Parish of Roxburgh. Svo, price Is. By Rev. WILLIAM LEE, Minister of the The Reform of the Church of Scotland. In Worship, Government, and Doctrine. By ROBERT LEE, D.D., Professor of Biblical Criticism in the University of Edinburgh, and Minister of Greyfriars. Part I. Worship. Svo, price 5s. Life in ITormandy ;! Sketches of French Fishing, Farming, Cooking, Natural History, and Politics, drawn from Nature. By an English Resident. 2 vols. Svo, with Maps and numerous Illustrations. Price 2-ls. Specimens of Ancient Gaelic Poetry. Collected between the years 1512 and 1529 by the Rev. JAMES M'GREGOR, Dean of Lismore — illustrative of the Language and Literature of the Scottish Highlands prior to tlie Sixteenth Century. Edited, with a Translation and Notes, by the Rev. Thomas Maclauchlan. The Introduction and additional Notes by William F. Skene. Svo, price 12s. Harmony of Revelation and the Sciences ; Address Delivered to the Members of the Edinburgh Philosophical Institution, Nov. 4, 1861, by the Right Rev. LORD BISHOP OF LONDON. Svo, price Is. The Case for the Crown in Re the "Wigton Martyrs proved to be Myths versus Wodrow and Lord Maeaulay, Patrick tlie Pedlar, and Principal TuUoch. By MARK NAPIER, Sheriff of Dumfriesshire. Svo, price 2s. Little Ella and the Fire-King, And other Fairy Tales, by M. W. , with Illustrations by Henry Warren. Second Edition. Itimo, cloth, 3s. 6d. Cloth extra, gilt edges, 4s. Deborah ; Or, Christian Principles for Domestic Servants. With Extract Readings for the Fireside. By Rev. NORMAN MACLEOD, D.D. l'2mo, limp cloth, price Is. The Philosophy of the Beautiful. By JOHN G. MACVICAR, D.D. With Illustrations. Crown Svo, cloth, 6s. 6d. First Lines of Science Simplified, And the Structure of Molecules Attempted. ' By the Rev. J. G. MACVICAR, D.D Svo, cloth, price 5s. Inquiry into Human Nature. By the Rev. J. G. MACVICAR, D.D. Svo, 7s. 6d. The Correct Form of Shoes. Wliy the Shoe Pinches. A contribution to Applied Anatomy. By HERMANN MEYER, M.D., Professor of Anatomy in the University of Zurich. Translated from the German by John Stirling Craig, L.R.C.P.B., L.R.C.S.E. Fcap., sewed, 6d. Game, Salmon, and Poachers. By the Earl of MINTO. Price Is. The Herring : Its Natural History and National Importance. By JOHN M. MITCHELL, F. R. S. S. A. , F. S. A. S. , F. R. P. S. , etc. Author of ' The Natural History of the Her- ring, considered in Connection with its Visits to the Scottish Coasts,' ' British Commercial Legislation,' ' Modern Athens and the Piraeus,' etc. With Six Illustra- tions, Svo, price 12s. The Insane in Private Dwellings. By ARTHUR MITCHELL, A.M., M.D., Deputy Commissioner in Lunacy for Scot- land, etc. Svo, price 48. tid. North British Eeview. Published Quarterly. Price 6s. " We hail the recent numbers of the North British as a sign of their advance, and a proof that a true Scot is as ready as ever to cross the Tweed and to vie suc- cessfully with his English competitors. It is seldom, if ever, tliat one sees so good a series of reviews — so good substantially in nearly all their articles, from the first page to the last. It is sensible on all its subjects, as distinguished from literary persiflage — a true whistle from the oaten straw which it is ever bracing to our nerves to hearken to." — Tiynes, Dec. 31. Biographical Annals of the Parish of Colinton. By THOMAS MURRAY, LL.D., Author of 'The Literary History of Galloway,' etc. , etc. Crown Svo, price 3s. 6d. 88 PKmCES STEEET, EDINBURGH. A Wew- Year's Gift to Children. By the author of " John Halifax Gentleman." With Illustrations, price Is. Nuggets from the Oldest Diggings ; Or, Researches in the Mosaic Creation. Crown Svo, cloth, price 3s. 6d. " At the Seaside." NugiB Critica; ; Occasional Papers written at the Seaside. By SHIRLEY. Crown Svo, price 9s. The Bishop's "Walk and The Bishop's Times. By ORWELL. Fcap. Svo, price 5s. Richard Arbour ; Or, The Scapegrace of the Family. By JAMES PAYN. Crown Svo, price 9s. Reminiscences of Scottish Life and Character. ByE. B. RAMSAY, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S.E., Dean of Edinburgh. Ninth Edition, carefully revised. 1 vol., fcap. Svo, price 5s. Railway Edition, price Is. 6d. " The Dean of Edinburgh has here produced a book for railway reading of the very first class. The persons (and they are many) who can only under such circum- stances devote ten minutes of attention to any page, without the certainty of a dizzy or stupid headache, in every page of this volume will find some poignant anecdote or trait which will last them a good half-hour for after-laughter : one of the pleasantest of human sensations." — Athenceum. Memoirs of Frederick Perthes ; Or, Literary, Religious, and Political Life in Germany from 1789 to 1S43. By C. T. PERTHES, Professor of Law at Bonn. Crown Svo, cloth, (js. Egypt : Its Climate, Character, and Resources as a Winter Resort. With an Appendix of Meteorological Notes. By A. HENRY RHIND, F.S. A. Fcap. Svo, cloth, price 3s. Scotland under her Early Bangs. A History of the Kingdom to the close of the 13th century. By E. WILLIAM ROBERTSON, in 2 vols. Svo, cloth, 36s. Doctor Antonio ; A Tale. By JOHN RUFFINI. Crown Svo, cloth, 4s. Cheap Edition, crown Svo, boards, 2s. Cd. Lorenzo Benoni ; Or, Passages in the Life of aii Italian. By JOHN RUFFINI. With Illustrations. Crown Svo, cloth gilt, 5s. Cheap Edition, crown Svo, boards, 2s. 6d. The Paragreens ; Or, A Visit to the Paris Universal Exhibition. By JOHN RUFFINI. With Illus- trations by John Leech. Fcap. cloth, 4s. The Salmon : Its HLstory, Position, and Prospects. By ALEX. RUSSEL. Svo, price 7s. 6d. Horeb and Jerusalem. By the Rev. GEORGE SANDIE. Svo, with Illustrations, price 10s. 6d. 10 EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS, Twelve Years in China ; The People, the Rebels, and the Mandarins, by a British Resident. With coloured Illustrations. Second Edition. With an Api^endix. Crown 8vo, cloth, price 10s. 6d. Archasology : its Past and its Future "Work. An Address given to the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. By J. Y. SIMPSON, Vice-President of the Society of Antiquaries. 8vo, price Is. The Law and Practice of Heraldry in Scotland. By GEORGE SETON, Advocate, M.A., Oxon, F.S.A., Scot. 8vo, with numerous Illustrations, 25s. *jt* A few copies on large paper, half-bound, 4'2s. " Cakes, Leeks, Puddings, and Potatoes." A Lecture on the Nationalities of the United Kingdom. By GEORGE SETON, Advocate, M.A., Oxon, etc. Second Edition. Fcap. Svo, sewed, price 6d. The Roman Poets of the Republic. By W. Y. SELLAR, M.A., Professor of Humanity in the University of Edinburgh, and formerly Fellow of Oriel College, Oxford. Svo, price 12s. Sketches of Highland Character.— Sheep Farmers and Drovers. With Vignette Illustration by Gourlay Steel, R.S.A. Price 6d. The Skip- Jack or Wireworm, and the Slug. With notices of the Microscope, Barometer, and Thermometer. For the use of Parish Schools. Fcap. Svo, limp clotli, price 9d. The Four Ancient Books of Wales, Containing the Kymric Poems" attributed to the Bards of the Sixth century. Edited, with an Introduction and Notes, by WILLIAM F. SKENE. 2 vols. Svo, with Illustrations. My Life and Times, 1741-1813. Being the Autobiography of the Rev. THOS. SOMERVILLE, Minister of Jedburgh, and one of His Majesty's Chaplains. Crown Svo, price 6s. Dugald Stew^art's Collected "Works. Edited by Sir Willi.4m Hamilton, Bart. Vols. I. to X. Svo, cloth, each 12s. Vol. I. — Dissertation. Vols. II., III., and IV. — Elements of the Philosophy af the Human Mind. 3 vols. Vol V. — Philosophical Essays. Vols. VI. and VII. — Philosophy of the Active and Moral Powers of Man. 2 vols. Vols. VIII. and IX. — Lectures on Political Economy. 2 vols. Vol. X.— Biographical Memoirs of Adam Smith, LL.D., William Robertson, D.D., and" Thomas Reid, D.D. To which is prefixed a Memoir of Dugald Stewart, with Selections from his Correspondence, by John Veitch, M. A. Supplementary Vol. — Translations of the Passages in Foreign Languages con- tained in the Collected Works ; with General Index gratis. Natural History and Sport in Moray. Collected from the Journals and Letters of the late CHARLES St. JOHN, Author of ' Wild Sports of the Highlands.' With a short Memoir of the Author. Crown Svo, price 8s. Od. 88 PRINCES STREET, EDINBURGH. . 11 Observations in Clinical Surgery". By JAMES SYME, Piofessor of Clinical Surgery in the University of Edinburgh. Sui'geon to the Queen in Scotland, etc., etc. Secoml Edition. 8vo, price 88. 6d. Stricture of the Urethra, and Fistula in Perineo. By Professor JAMES SYME. Svo, 4s. 6d. Treatise on the Excision of Diseased Joints. By Professor JAMES SYME. Svo, 5s. On Diseases of the Rectum. By Professor JAMES SYME. Svo, 4s. 6d. Excision of the Scapula. By Professor JAMES SYME. Svo, inice 2s. 6d. Lessons for School Life ; Being Selections from Sermons preached in the Chapel of Rugby School during his Head Mastership. By The Right Reverend The Lord Bishop of London. Fcap., cloth, 5s. The Two Cosmos. A Tale of Fifty Y''ears Ago. Crown Svo, lOs. 6d. What is Sabbath-Breaking ? Svo, price 2s. Day Dreams of a Schoolmaster. By D'ARCY W. THOMPSON. Second Edition. Fcap. Svo, price 5s. Ancient Leaves ; Or Metrical Renderings of Poets, Greek and Roman. By D'ARCY W. THOMPSON. Fcap. Svo, 6s. Memoir of George Wilson, M.D., F.II.S.E., Regius Professor of Technology in the University of Edinburgh, and Director of the Industrial Museum of Scotland. By his S'ister, JESSIE AITKEN WILSON. Third Thousand. Svo, cloth, 10s. 6d. Life of Dr. John Reid, Late Chandos Professor of Anatomy and Medicine in the University of St. Andrews. By the late GEORGE WILSON, M.D. Fcap. Svo, cloth, price 8s. Researches on Colour-Blindness. With a Supplement on the danger attending the i)resent system of Railway and Marine Colouied Signals. By the late GEORGE WILSON, M.D. Svo, 5s. Memoir of the Rev. Henry Wight. By his Sou. Fcap. Svo, cloth, price 3s. ; with portrait, 4s. 6d. Dante's Divina Commedia— The Inferno. Translated by W. P. Wilkie, Advocate. Fcap. Svo, price 5s. ^ THE NORTH BRITISH REVIEW PUBLISHED QUARTERLY. Price 6s. EDMONSTON AND DOUGLAS, EDINBUEGH. %