CO CD- en; 00 = CD; en; cn= ^ i:jrGlMKEIJ JJY JOMJiTSMimiN. [H^E\/c (S OLIB E [R^TT TEMlf^EWTT, rj SEEMONS AND ESSAYS BT THX T E N N E N T(_S~\\Gr^\^ev^ ^ Vn 0 o AND THEIR CONTEMPORARIES, COMPILED FOR THE BOARD. -^ ^1^9 PHIL-ADELPHIA: PRESBYTERIAN BOARJ) OF PUBLICATION, NO. 265 CHESTNUT STB££T. Lt^ssl Entered according to Act of Congress, in tlie year 1865, by A. W. MITCHELL, M. D, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court for the Eastern District of Ponnsylrania. CONTENTS. Pask I. — The Justice of God. — By the Rev. Gilbert Ten- nent, ........ 9 n. — The Divine Mercy. — By tte Same, . . 84 in. — The Grace of God. — By the Same, . . 49 IV. — The "Wisdom of God in Redemption. — By the Same, 69 v. — Treatise on the Doctrine of Predestination. By the Rev. Samuel Blair, .... 99 YI. — Observations on Regeneration. — By the Rev. John Blair, 189 VII. — An Essay on the Means of Grace. — By the Same, ... ... 207 VIII. — God's Sovereignty, no Objection to the Sinner's Striving. — By William Tennent, Jr., 229 IX. — Regeneration opened. — ^By the Rev. John Tennent, ....... 256 X. — The Principle of Sin and Holiness. — By the Rev. Robert Smith, D. D., . . . . 309 XI. — The Spiritual Conflict. — By the Same, . 330 XII. — The Madness of Mankind. — By the Rev. Samuel Finley, D. D., . . . . 354 (ui) ADVERTISEMENT. This volume of discourses owes its present form to the Rev. A. Alexander, by whom most of them were selected, and it was intended as a supplement to the " Log College."* The biographical notices are extracted from that work, and are intended simply to introduce the authors to those who have not read their full biographies. It was the desire of the compiler to have given a specimen of the writings of the Rev. William Tennent, Sen., but he has not been able to obtain one, and probably there is not one in existence ; as Dr. Alexander, in his biography of him, says," Mr. Tennent, as far as we know, never published anything." S. D. A. Freehold, N. J. * Published by the Board of Publication. 1* (V) GILBERT TENNENT. Gilbert Tennent was the eldest son of the Rev. William Ten- nent, Sen., the founder of the Log College. From an original docu- ment, a small memorandum book, kept by his father, we learn that he was born in the County of Armagh, Ireland, on the 5th of Oct., 1703. He was therefore thirteen or fourteen years old when his father immigrated to this country. He received his education under his father's roof, before the founding of the Log College, and when this school was opened, he assisted his father in teach- ing. His first religious impressions of any permanency, were ex- perienced soon after his arrival in this country. And during the several years in which he was under serious concern, besides his other studies, he pursued a course of theological reading. But having doubts as to his spiritual condition, he was fearful of entering the holy ministry; and commenced the study of medicine, which he prosecuted for the space of a year. But about this time, it pleased God to reveal himself to him with so much clearness and comfort, that all his doubts, and sorrows, and fears were dispelled ; and the Sun of Righteousness arose upon him with healing under his wings. And no sooner was he satisfied of his saving interest in Christ, than he felt himself called to seek the ministry, which he had before been deterred from thinking of. After due prepara- tion and study, he was licensed to preach the gospel, by the Prea-^ bytery of Philadelphia, in May, 1726. After his licensure, he preached for several Sabbaths in New Castle on the Delaware. (7) 8 GILBERT TENNENT. Declining a call to this church, he soon after accepted one from the Presbyterian Church of New Brunswick, and in the autumn of 1726 was ordained by the Presbytery of New Brunswick. From his first entrance on the public work of the ministry, the preaching of Gilbert Tennent was very popular and attractive, with all classes of hearers. He possessed uncommon advantages as a preacher. In person, he was taller than the common stature, and well proportioned in every respect. His aspect was grave and venerable, and his address prepossessing. His voice was clear and commanding, and his manner in the pulpit was exceedingly earnest and impressive. His reasoning powers, also, were strong, and his language often nervous, and indeed sublime. No one could hear him, without being convinced that he was deeply in earnest. His style was copious and sometimes elegant. Indeed, in the vigour of his age few preachers could equal him. In the winter of 1740 and 1741, Mr. Tennent visited Boston with Mr. Whitefield, where he spent three months, preaching almost every day with extraordinary power and success. In May, 1743, Mr. Tennent was called to a new church in Phil- adelphia, formed from those who were converted under the preach- ing of Mr. Whitefield. This call he accepted, and exercised his ministry with great fidelity and diligence for twenty years. The only interruption to his pastoral labours in Philadelphia was occasioned by a mission to Great Britain, in conjunction with the Rev. Samuel Davis of Virginia, for the College of New Jersey. For about three years before his death, Mr. Tennent became very infirm, so that he was unable to go through the duties which devolved upon him as the pastor of a large city congregation. His death occurred in the year 1764. SERMON I. THE JUSTICE OF GOD. BT THE REV. GILBERT TENNENT. " He is the rock ; his work is perfect ; for all his ways are judgment ; a God of truth, and without iniquity, just and right is he." — Deut. xxxii. 4. Moses Introduces his song in this chapter with the most solemn and commanding magnificence, and yet with the softest charms of language. He summons the attention of the inanimate creation, partly to reprove the stupidity of Israel, and partly to bear witness to the truth of what he was about to deliver to them in the following song, either for their instruction or warning, as well as to wit- ness to the justice and equity of the divine proceedings against that unhappy nation : " Give ear, 0 heavens, and I will speak, and hear, 0 earth, the words of my mouth." In the second verse, the devout penman of this song wishes that the instructions contained in it, may be re- freshing to and effectual upon his beloved nation, as the rain and dew upon the earth : " My doctrine shall drop as the rain, my speech shall distil as the dew." These words may be considered as a prayer of Moses, as if he had said, 0 that it might do so ! Thus Bishop Patrick un- (9) 10 THE JUSTICE OF GOD. derstands the words. In the next verse, lie signifies his In- tention to make known the glory of God, and therefore excites them to ascribe greatness to him; which intcn* tion he performs in the words of our text, wherein we have a representation of the divine glory and greatness appa- rent in the perfection of his works and equity of his gov- ernment, in a variety of particulars, viz : 1. He is called a Rock, to signify the stability of his nature, the firmness of his counsels, the immutability of his promises, and the almightiness of his power ; in all which respects he is a se- cure shelter and unshaken foundation for our resort and confidence. 2. His work is perfect. " His work of creation was so; all that he made in its original constitution was very good ; his works of redemption and providence shall be so, when the mystery of God is finished." " God's works are true and cannot be blamed," saith Ainsworth upon the place : " God never recalls his counsels, but perfects them. God's work is called perfect, because he fulfilled what he promised to the fathers." 3. All his ways are judgment ; i. e., saith Henry, " The ends of his ways are all righteous, and he Is wise in the choice of the means in order to those ends." By Crod's ways, we are to understand all God's providential admin- istrations towards intelligent creatures, and by judgment^ prudence, and justice. Hos. xlv. 9. 4. He is a Grod of truth ; i. e., as Mr. Pool observes In his Synopsis, " Faithful In lils promises ; whose word we may depend upon, for he cannot lie." THE JUSTICE OF GOD. 11 5. Without iniquity — lie is perfectly fi*ee from all moral blemish and defect. " He deceives none that confide in him, and wrongs none that apply for justice, and is hard upon none that cast themselves upon his mercy." 6. Just and right is he. God is holy and equal in his distributions ; as he is just in himself, so he is just in all his dealings with mankind ; none can with reason accuse him of insincerity, unrighteousness, or levity. Now that attribute or perfection of God which is prin- cipally represented in our text, by a beautiful variety of expressions, is his justice ; this, therefore, is the subject of our meditations. That God is just, the Scriptures prove many ways, particularly, 1. Metaphorically and figura- tively, when he is therein called a consuming fire, an an- gry lion, a man of war. Deut. iv. 24. Isa. xxxviii. 13. 2. Affectively, by attributing to him zeal, anger, jeal- ousy, fury. Num. xi. 10. Exo. xx. 5 ; xxxii. 10. The aforesaid afiections suppose justice in creatures, and though they be passions in them, they are in God but an act of immutable justice. 3. Effectively, by showing that he renders to every one according to his works. 1 Sam. xxvi. 23. 4. Negatively, by removing from him all injustice and iniquity, all respect of persons ; and in a word, all the causes and effects of injustice. " Doth God pervert judg- ment, or doth the almighty pervert justice ?" Job viii. 3. Dan. ix. 13. Rom. iii. 4. 5. Positively, by affirming and extolling his justice, by calling him a revenger, holy, right. Jer. xii. 1. Ps. xi. 7. 12 THE JUSTICE OF GOD. -For the righteous Lord loveth righteousness, his counte- nance doth behold the upright. To these we may add the words of our text, than which nothing can be more full and express : " He is a rock, his work is perfect, for all his ways are judgment ; a God of truth, and without iniquity, just and right is he ;" and also that of the Psalmist, Ps. cxix. 137, "Righteous art thou, 0 Lord, and upright are thy judgments." And does not reason confirm the same truth ? For, 1st, if God be not just, whence is there any justice ? Either there would be no justice at all, or if there was any, it would not proceed from God ; or if it did, it must proceed from one who had none ; each of which particulars is absurd. Besides, 2d, inasmuch as the Lord is governor of the whole universe, he would degene- rate into a tyrant if he was not just ; and, 3d, seeing Je- hovah is judge of all the earth, how could he judge aright without being just himself ? Neither can it be otherwise but that God should be just, seeing that he is absolutely perfect. All confess justice to be an excellency, invol- ving no imperfection in it, and therefore it cannot be wanting to that being, who is absolutely and infinitely perfect. In discoursing upon this divine attribute of God's jus- tice, I propose to consider its nature, kinds, properties, displays, and in the fifth place, to answer some objections, and then proceed to the improvement. And, 1. Justice in its general nature may be said to be an agreement with right and rule. It is opposed to crook- edness and obliquity, by which any thing declines from THEJUSTICEOFGOD. 13 its proper rule. Crookedness in morals is the same -witli sin ; which the apostle John calls " a transgression of the law." 1 John iii. 4. Or, as the original word anomia may be rendered, a being without the law, or a wandering from the law. Justice, therefore, does coincide with recti- tude or uprightness : " Lo, this only I have found, that God hath made man upright." Eccl. vii. 29. So that justice includes two things in it especially, viz : right, and an agreement with that right. 1st, I say, it includes right or that which belongs to every one : " Render therefore unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's." Luke xx. 25. " Knowing the judgments of God, that they that do such things are worthy of death." Rom. i. 32. It is from this right that the very name of justice is derived. And, 2nd, it includes an agreement with this right^ and in this the form of justice consists ; and the contrary to this, viz : a disagreement from right, constitutes the form of injustice. From this general de- scription it is evident that justice admits of no degrees, for the thing either agrees with the rule of right or not ; if the former, it is just, if the latter, it is unjust. Undoubt- edly the justice of God, as well as of creatures, consists in an agreement with right, but with this diiference, that the creatures have their rule of right prescribed by another ; whereas the divine nature is a rule of right to the Almighty. But let me pass to the second, and speak of the hinds of justice. And here it may be observed that justice may be considered under a threefold view, viz : as relating to God's will^ word, and deeds. And, 1. Justice, as it relates 2 14 THEJUSTICEOFGOD. to the will of God, is thus described by Wendeline, viz : " That it is that whereby God is just in himself and without himself gives to every one their own by a constant will." "Justice in man," saith Mr. Leigh, "is a settled will to do right in everything to every person." Thus God hath a settled will to do right, — " shall not the judge of all the earth do right ?" This constant will of God to render to every one his own, coincides with the divine essence, and may be called his essential justice, and is no other but the essential rectitude of his nature. And that justice of God which respects his words and deeds, may be called his declarative or relative justice, because it is a manifestation of the former, and respects the transactions of God with creatures. But 2. The justice of God, as it relates to his words, is called truth, faithfulness, and constancy; because it agrees with the rectitude of his nature to speak so and no other- wise. Faithfulness may be called justice, because it ia a doing justice to his word. 3. The justice of God, as it respects his deeds, is two- fold, viz: of dominion and jurisdiction. And, 1st, God's justice of dominion, or, as some divines term it, his dispo- sing justice, is that whereby Jehovah, as the sole Monarch and supreme Lord of all, disposes and governs every thing in a just order; and in particular he disposes his own actions according to the rule of equity, requiring and prohibiting nothing but what is fit for intelligent creatures, in right reason, to do and forbear. In a word, this justice of dominion consists in governing reasonable creatures TIIEJUSTICEOFaOD. 15 agreeable to the original rectitude of their natures. 2nd, God's justice of jurisdiction consists in prescribing to reasonable creatures their proper due, and in governing them accordingly: and this the Almighty doth by three things: 1. By prescribing laws, which are rules tending to direct mankind in their duty to God and man, agreeable to his own sanctity, attended with rewards and punish- ments. " There is one lawgiver who is able to save and to destroy." James iv. 12. 2. By establishing his laws by proper sanctions of rewards and punishments promised and threatened (Deut. xxx. 15); now the sanc- tion consists in promises and threatenings. And, 3. By fulfilling the sanction, and that both as to the reward and punishment : the former is called remunerative, and the latter vindictive. And, 1st, "The remunerative justice of God is a most ready will to perform God's promises," as Wendeline observes ; when God rewards the obedience of his creatures with a free reward, proceeding from his own pure and abounding goodness, not for any worth or condignity in his people's works, as the Papists vainly dream, but for the sake of his gracious promise, by which he makes himself a debtor to them. "Who will render to every man according to his deeds; to them who by patient continuing in well doing, seek for glory, and hon- our, and immortality, eternal life. But to them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, indignation and wrath." Rom. ii. 6, 7, 8. "When we have done all that is commanded, we must say that we are unprofitable servants ; we have done that which was (but) our duty to 16 THEJUSTICEOFGOD. do." Luke xvii. 10. "Or who hath first given to him, and it shall be recompensed to him again? For of him, and through him, and to him are all things." Rom. xi. 35, 36. Although there be no intrinsic worth in man's obedience to merit the glory or reward promised, yet God having promised it to the creature, and having a right and power to confer it, it is just and right in him to perform his own word. And certainly, he would wrong his truth if he did not. When happiness, in Scripture, is represented as a reward, it is only to encourage or excite to obedience, by showing the inseparable connection between grace wrought in us, and glory conferred upon us. It cannot intend any merit in our works ; for if we ourselves be less than the least of God's mercies, then the best actions put forth by us must be so; for, as Dr. Ridgely observes, "The action cannot have more honour ascribed to it than the agent." Being God's creatures, we have derived all from him, and consequently can offer him no more than his own. And being corrupt criminals, our services are defective, and so cannot merit good at the hand of God; nay, on the con- trary, for our transgressions we merit his wrath. And therefore in respect of us, the reward of happiness is wholly gracious; but indeed in respect of Christ, who has fully answered the demands of law for his people, by his obedience and suffering, and thereby, according to the covenant transaction between his Father and him, com- pletely purchased for them everlasting life, it may be called an act of divine justice. Hence it is said, "That he might be just, and the justifier of him that believes in Jesus." Ilom. ii. 26. But THEJUSTICEOFGOD. IT 2. The vindictive justice of God is the Almighty's will to execute the threatenings of his law upon transgressors, by punishing or inflicting on them evils of suffering equal to their crimes. This is called wrath, hatred, revenge, and judgment. It is likewise termed God's "visiting iniquity." Jer. v. 9. His "setting his face against a person." Lev. xvii. 10. It is called the fire of God's jealousy, and those that are exposed to it, are said to fall into the hands of the living God. Some divines use the terms of rewarding and revenging justice, instead of re- munerative and vindictive. But here I would have it observed, that there is a less proper sense in which the word punishment is used in Scripture. Thus, when God corrects his people with his rod, this is often called punishment (Ps. Ixxxix. 30, 33) ; and hence they are said to bear the indignation of the Lord, because they have sinned against him. Micah vii. 9. These afllictions are called punishments, because occa- sioned by sin and afflictive to sense ; but they are not in- flicted by God as a judge, with any demand of satisfac- tion, for that was made by Christ for those that believe in him; and surely, it is contrary to the nature of divine justice to require a double satisfaction for the same crimes ! No ! the afflictions of God's people spring from his fatherly love to them, and are sent either to prevent or correct sinful disorders. By these the Almighty humbles his people, by showing them the desert of their impieties; and by these he brings them nearer to himself, and deadens them more to a vain world, and all its varnished but empty 2* 18 TIIEJUSTICEOFGOD. entertainments. Afflictions are the medicines which the great Physician uses to cure his people's manifold dis- orders. But that what has been said, concerning the nature of divine justice, may be further explained and illustrated, let these things following be considered : 1st. That justice among men is two-fold, viz : either commutative or distributive. Commutative respects trade and bargains among equals, and consists in observing the rules of equity and right therein. Distributive is that which is exercised by a superior towards his inferiors, and consists in the conformity of their administrations to rule and law, and, therefore, comprises these four things in it, viz : 1. A law to which the acts of government should be conformed. A law, says Maresius, " est faciendorum et fugiendorum norma, sub ratione premii et poenae," i. e. " it is a rule of things to be done and avoided, on consideration of a reward or punishment." All justice, and especially dis- tributive, has respect to a law ; this is the foundation on which it is built, and the rule according to which it must be squared and accommodated. Now the law that is the ground and foundation of justice among men, must have the following characters, viz : 1st, it must be bottomed upon natural equity, upon the nature, relation and reason of things, otherwise it will be a crooked rule, and so unworthy of observation. No human authority can alter the intrinsic goodness and bad- ness of things ; and therefore bad laws (in a moral sense) are but a recommending and enforcing iniquity by human TIIEJUSTICEOFGOD. 19 authority. And, 2d, the law must be enacted by competent authority and power ; because legislation as well as the execution thereof, are acts of government, which those that exercise should have a right so to do, either originally or by delegation, the contrary to which tends to open a scene of confusion and blood. And hence it is well ob- served by some, that however just any act of government be in itself, yet it is unjust for those to meddle with it, that have no right thereto : e. g. for a judge to condemn one guilty of a capital crime to death, is just ; but for a private person divested of authority to do it, is murder. And, 3d, the law must be promulgated, that it may be known, "for where there is no law, there is no transgression." Rom. iv. 15. But the Second particular, that civil justice, or justice among men includes, is Conformity to the law in all administrations. When a judge does this, in all his inquiries and examina- tions respecting cases brought before him, he does his duty, and otherwise he perverts the ways of judgment. It is this kind of justice among men, that is an emblem or shadow of the justice of God, and therefore I have so long discoursed upon it. But to show the similitude, let me add a few words more, and inquire, what is God's declara- tive or relative justice, but his conformity to the law he has given his creatures in his transactions with them ? Here observe, 1st, That- the law which God gave to man to direct him in his service, is grounded on natural equity, or the nature and reason of things ; which appears by the harmony of its precepts among themselves, and 20 THE JUSTICE OF GOD. their direct tendency to promote the glory of God, and make the creature happy in his service ; the contraries to which tend to dishonour God, debase our intelligent nature, and destroy our happiness. The moral law is but a transcript of his nature as it is imitable. And hence is the Apostle's just commendatory encomium concerning it : " Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just and good." Rom. vii. 12. And, 2d, That God had authority to enact laws, appears evidently from his creating all. As his infinite and eternal excellency makes him worthy of absolute sovereignty and dominion, so his producing all by his almightiness gives him an irrefra- gable right thereto. Human power is derived, delegated, and limited, but his is original and absolute. And, 3d, Almighty God having annexed the sanction of rewards and punishments to the law he has given his creatures, his truth stands engaged to execute the same upon suitable objects ; which is likewise necessary to answer the designs of government. This execution, therefore, of the sanction of the law, or conformity thereto, in the dealings of God with his creatures, is his declarative justice, and with this even all his acts of sovereignty do really harmonize, which appears by considering, 3d. The properties of divine justice, which are these fol- lowing, viz : 1. Divine justice is impartial^ with him is no respect of persons in judgment : " For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, THEJUSTICEOFGOD. 21 wliether it be good or bad." 2 Cor. v. 10. Justice will not spare for the sake of the multitude, greatness, or near- ness of the guilty. Did not Sodom and Gomorrah per- ish by fire, and was not the whole antediluvian world drowned with water ? And what vast multitudes of peo- ple may we suppose did the aforesaid cities, together with Zeboim and Admah, contain ? And how much more the whole world before the flood ? And yet all were destroyed by a sudden and terrible stroke of divine justice. And when the angels, those spirits of excelling dignity, sinned, did not divine justice cast them into an abyss of woe ? And does it not still confine them in chains of darkness to the judgment of the great day? When Adam, our federal head, had transgressed the covenant, was he not banished from that paradise of pleasure he before pos- sessed, and kept out of it by a flaming sword ? Divine justice scatters kings as snow in Salmon, and before its adverse edge, their pompous armies flee apace. Ps. Ixviii. 12, 14. And were not Moses and David, though so near and dear to God, punished with awful severity ? Hence is that solemn and soul-afi"ecting saying of the prophet : " Hear this word that the Lord hath spoken against you, 0 children of Israel. You only have I known of all the families of the earth, therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities." Amos iii. 1, 2. But divine justice is— 2. Universal, so that not one sin can escape severe punishment, either in the sinner or surety : " Cursed is every one that continucth not in all things that are writ- ten in the book of the law to do them." Gal. iii. 10. 22 THE JUSTICE OF GOD. 3. Divine justice is inexorable, no importunities can alter its course. When once a sinner's season of mercy expires, Jehovah refuses to be entreated. " Though Noah, Daniel, and Job were in it, as I live, saith the Lord God, they shall deliver neither son nor daughter ; they shall but deliver their own souls by their righteousness." Ez. xiv. 18, 20. This is twice repeated in that chapter, to show the infallible certainty and unspeakable importance of the truth delivered. The almighty cannot be corrupted or bribed. But that which further confirms this awful truth, is the 4th proposition, viz : The displays of divine justice. And here, to be as brief as I can, I shall only mention two in- stances thereof. The first of which was the sufferings our Lord endure^ when he stood in the sinner's room and place. How unspeakable were the tortures he endured in his sa- cred body, every part of which was put to exquisite pain ! Deep furrows were made in his sacred back by cruel scourges, and his beauteous face exposed to contemptuous blows, yea, to shame and spitting, by the insulting herd ; his venerable temples were pierced by thorns, his side and heart by a spear ; the whole weight of his body hung upon a few sinewy and sensible parts in his crucifixion, and his name was treated with the greatest ignominy and scorn. But, as Mr. Flavel justly observes, " The soul of our Lord's sufferings was his sufferings in his soul." When he who knew no sin was made sin for us, his soul was made an offering for sin, his soul became sorrowful even unto death. How inconceivable must be the anguish which our Lord THEJUSTICEOFGOD. 23 endured in his soul, when in one instant of time, that whole weight of distress and pain, which was due to divine justice for all the sins of the elect world, were laid upon it, and in the meantime deserted by the Father in respect of his comfortable presence ! This pressed a bloody shower from all the pores of our Lord's body in the garden of Geth- semane. This extorted that heart-rending outcry on the cross, "Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" No wonder the earth's foundation trembled, and the dead awoke out of their long and silent slumbers, and the sun itself, that glorious orb of light and beauty, put on a funeral robe of darkness and obscurity, to testify their surprise and sorrow on so awful an occasion, and to complete the train of mourners. But secondly. The vindictive justice of God has a dreadful display in the torments of the damned, who are punished with ever- lasting destruction, from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power. As the damned are deprived of all the honours and comforts of the heavenly paradise, as they are burnt in a lake of fire, which is kindled by the breath of God, as by a river of brimstone ; so their intol- erable tortures, by God's inflamed jealousy, by their own guilty consciences, by wicked men and devils, will know no intermission and no end; " the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever." But I hasten to the 5th proposition, which was to answer some objections oifered against the justice of God. And 1st. It is objected by the Socinians, that, according to 24 THEJUSTICEOFGOD. our doctrine, God punished the innocent in the room of the guilty, namely, our Saviour in the place of sinners. Ans. Though our Saviour was personally innocent, yet he was, with his own consent, and by his Father's impu- tation, guilty. And, hence, he is said, to be " made sin for us;" he willingly became the sinner's surety, and so assumed their guilt, in order to satisfy for it, and save them from ruin ; and to a willing person, who had a right to dispose of his own life, especially seeing so valuable an end was answered by it, as the salvation of sinners, no injury was done by his Father imputing him to death, 2d. It is objected that God sometimes punishes the sins of the parents in their children. Ex. xx. 5. Ans. God never punishes the sins of the parents in inno- cent children. As to the sin of Adam, he being the federal head, or covenant representative of his whole oiFspring, they sinned in him. " But they, like Adam, (as the word should be rendered,) have transgressed the covenant." Hos. vi. 7. " Wherefore as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned" {i. e. in Adam). Rom. v. 12. And as to the sins of private parents, they are not punished in children unless they be prepense to them or imitate them. 3d. It is objected that God is a respecter of persons in the affair of predestination, by dispensing unequal things to those that were in an equal state, choosing one and rejecting another, without any reason but his own plea- sure. THE JUSTICE OFGOD. 25 Ans. To respect persons is when, in matters of judg- ment, equal things according to law and right are due to several persons, and yet we dispense unequal ; but this is not the case with the Almighty. "Who hath given to him," saith the Apostle, " and it shall be repaid ? for of him are all things." Rom. xi. 36. As to God's grace, he owes it to no creature as such. He is Lord of his own treasures, and may do with his own what he pleases. Rom. ix. 18, 21. And, therefore, such as favour the objection, do but reply against God, as the Apostle there observes. Predestination is but an immanent act of God, which pro- duces nothing without himself, and, consequently, dispenses neither good nor evil, though it be the pattern according to which his providence dispenses all things in time. But if we consider God's providence which dispenses salvation and damnation, that does not confer unequal things upon those that are equal; but it confers unequal things upon those that are unequal, viz : believers and unbelievers ; for Christ's sake, salvation to the former, and for sin's sake, damnation to the latter. If a prince of a number of rebels, who all, according to law, deserve death, pm-poses and passes an act of pardon upon some to show his cle- mency, and lets the law take place upon others to show his justice, where is the wrong ? And that is the case ; for God in his purposes looked upon men as fallen, and meriting his displeasure ; he might have left the whole race to perish for their sins with the devils, who after their fall had never an offer of mercy. And because Jehovah has chosen some, when he might have condemned all, shall our eye be evil because God is good? 26 THE JUSTICE OF GOD. 4tli. It is objected, that God suffers the wicked to pros- per, and the pious to be afflicted and oppressed. Ans. This world is a time of probation, and not of recompense. The scales will turn at the conclusion of this short scene, this transient drama. Besides, the mis- eries of God's people are necessary physic to cure their maladies, to which end they are sanctified by the Spirit of God. Rom. viii. 29. They are also at times sweetened with the love of Christ, and shall soon expire, and then an everlasting salvation shall commence ; whereas, on the contrary, the abused prosperity of the wicked tends but to secure and increase their destruction. But it is time to proceed to the improvement. And 1st. This subject speaks terror to all ungodly and Christless sinners of every kind. How deplorable is their case, "who must drink of the wine of the wrath of the Almighty, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation!" 0 ! let the secure and impeni- tent transgressor think on the following particulars: 1. That God, upon the account of his justice and judg- ments, is called the "great and dreadful God." Dan. ix. 4. Likewise, "mighty and terrible." Deut. vii. 22. "With God," saith Job, "is terrible majesty." Job xxxvii. 22. 2. That the wages of every sin is death, and that you have been guilty of a prodigious multitude, attended with awful aggravations: sins against light and love, against law and gospel, mercy and judgments ; your iniquities, for number, rival the stars, and for aggrava- tion, are red as crimson. And, 3. That the justice of THE JUSTICE OF GOD. 27 God will not, can not pass by one of them, except ye re- pent, but will surely proportion pains equal to all their number and heinousness. For, as has been observed, it is impartial, universal, inexorable. And now, seeing every imagination of the thoughts of your hearts has been, since your birth until now, only evil continually, and all your words and actions evil ; for a corrupt tree cannot bring forth good fruit, neither can he that is in the flesh please God, how dreadful must that wrath be which is proportioned to them all ! Surely it is, 1st, Incomprehensible wrath ; the most fearful imagination cannot fully represent it by its most gloomy ideas. " Who knoweth the power of thine anger ? even according to thy fear, so is thy wrath." Ps. xc. 11. 2d. It is unavoidable wrath. If we take the morning wings and flee to the uttermost ends of the earth, lo, there God's all-seeing eye will discern us, and his righteous arm arrest us. If we ascend to the top of Carmel, or descend into the deeps of the ocean, or seek to conceal ourselves with the curtain of obscurity, darkness and retirement, even there our persons and purposes will be open to the all-penetrating eye of God. " For the darkness is as the light to him, and the night shines as the day." Sinners, ye cannot escape by policy, for God is infinite in wisdom ; nor by power, for he is infinite in strength, as Job observes, " He is wise in heart, and mighty in strength, who hath hardened himself against God and prospered ? Job ix. 4. Nor can ye escape by flight, for Jehovah is omnipresent. 3d. It is eternal wrath (Matt. xxv. 46.) ; it will continue 28 THE JUSTICE OF GOD. as long as God endures ; never, never, never shall it know a period. 0 ! this gives it a dreadful and heart-rending accent ! And, 4th, It is intolerable wrath. If the Re- deemer, who was personally innocent and supported by the Godhead, cried so dolorously under this wrath, how can your hands be strong, or your hearts endure, when a jealous God deals with you, and pours out the vials of his unmixed wrath upon you, who are full of real and crimson guilt, and shall have none to succour you ? And do you think that that just God, who spared not his own beloved Son, when he but stood in sinners' place, but smote him dead by the sword of his justice, and made all the waves of his almighty vengeance beat upon him, and roll over him, will spare you who are covered all over with real and scarlet guilt ? No, friends, " be not deceived, God is not mocked ; for whatsoever a man soweth that shall he also reap." He that sows to the flesh, shall of the flesh reap corruption. The intolerableness of the divine wrath, anger and hatred, as well as its terribleness, is represented in Scripture by a variety of bold and dreadful images of thought. I shall mention a few of them, and in the name of the great God charge the ungodly to think upon them : " For a fire is kindled in my anger, and shall burn to the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains. I will drop mischiefs upon them. I will spend my arrows upon them." Deut. xxxii. 22, 23. "Which removeth the mountains and they know it not ; which overturneth them in his anger ; which shaketh the earth out of her place, THEJUSTICEOFGOD. 29 and the pillars thereof tremble ; which commandeth the sun and it riseth not, and sealeth up the stars." Job ix. 5, 6, 7. " Upon the wicked he shall rain snares, fire and brimstone, and a horrible tempest ; this shall be the portion of their cup." Ps. xi. 6. Elsewhere Jehovah threatens to wound the hairy scalp of the wicked, and tear them in pieces when there shall be none to deliver them. Hos. v. 14. That he will be to them as a lion and as a leopard, and meet them as a bear bereaved of her whelps, devour them like a lion and rend the caul of their hearts. Hos. xiii. 8. And with what magnificence and grandeur of diction does the prophet Nahum speak upon this solemn subject : " God is jealous, and the Lord revengeth ; the Lord revengeth, and is furious. The Lord will take vengeance on his adversaries, and he reserveth wrath for his enemies. The Lord is slow to anger, and great in power, and will not at all acquit the wicked : the Lord hath his way in the whirlwind and in the storm, and the clouds are the dust of his feet. He rebuketh the sea, and maketh it dry, and drieth up all the rivers : Bashan lan- guisheth, and Carmel, and the flower of Lebanon languish- eth. The mountains quake at him, and the hills melt, and the earth is burned at his presence, yea, the world, and all that dwell therein. Who can stand before his in- dio-nation? and who can abide in the fierceness of his anger ? His fury is poured out like fire, and the rocks are thrown down by him." Nahum i. 2 — 7. Now as the consideration of God's justice and wrath ministers terror to all the ungodly in general, so especially 30 THEJUSTICEOFGOD. and particularly to these following, viz : 1. Epicures, who indulge a sensual security, and put the evil day far from them. Surely such treasure up to themselves wrath against the day of wrath, and the revelation of the righteous judg- ment of God. Surely the day of the Lord will be to them, as the prophet expresseth it, "cruel with wrath and fierce anger." Isa. xiii. 9. And, 2d. All unjust persons who are guilty of fraud in contracts, and dealings with men, or respecting of persons in judgment. "Woe to him that buildeth his house by unrighteousness, and his chambers by wrong." Jer. xxii. 13. Ps. Ixxxii. 2, 5. 3d. All hypo- crites, such as are unjust to God and their own souls, who cover their inward injustice with an outward show of piety. Such are an abomination to God, and may expect to be cut asunder by the sword of divine justice. Matt. xxiv. 50, 51. 4th. All murmurers, who call in question the justice of God in his judgments, and kick with the heel against the Most High, under frowns of providence. For this, the whole congregation of Israel fell in the wilderness, and never saw Canaan, two excepted. Num. xiv. 27 — 30. Now the use I would advise poor graceless sinners, of every age and order, to make of the justice of God, is to be excited by it to fly to Christ for security and defence. " He is a hiding place from the wind, and a covert from the storm." Isa. xxxii. 2. 1st. He was made sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him. In Him God the Father has declared his righteousness (Rom. iii. 25) ; and Him he is willing to make righteousness to such as accept of him. 1 Cor. i. 30. Well, seeing divine justice must THEJUSTICEOFGOD. 31 be satisfied for the wrong done by our offences, either by us, or a surety in our place, or else we must perish eternally : then, seeing we oui'selves cannot satisfy, because we are poor, imperfect and finite creatures, let us hasten to Christ and receive liim by faith, as the gospel offers him, that so we may be justified by faith, and securely rest on and rejoice in that Jesus, who has fulfilled the righteous- ness of the law for his people. Rom. viii. 3. But, 2d. This subject speaks comfort to all believers in every one of their troubles ; for from this they may see that they are afflicted less than their iniquities deserve, that a Father's love is the spring of them, who chastens them lest they should be condemned with the world. And particularly we may draw comfort from this subject, under calumnies and ■\vrongs, when we think that we have a wit- ness in heaven, a just Judge there, who will uphold us in a good cause, and reward us according to our righteousness, and make it sooner or later to "shine forth as the light, and our judgment as the noonday." Ps. xxxvii. 6. Yea, in troubles of conscience God's justice yields support, when we consider that it was once satisfied by our Lord, and that it is contrary to its nature to requLre a double satisfaction. Hence is the Apostle's query, "Who is he that condemneth ? it is Christ that died." Rom. viii. 34. But there are these following duties, which, from the consideration of divine justice, we should be exhorted to perform, viz : 1st. That we beware of depending upon our own righteousness, upon the one hand, with the Pharisee (Luke xviii. 11) ; and of the neglect of duty, on the other, 82 THEJUSTICEOFGOD. with the sluggard whose hands refuse to labour: "for without holiness no man shall see the Lord." Heh. xii. 14. 2d. Let us walk with humble reverence and child- like fear before the righteous God, as with a consuming fire, avoiding every appearance of evil, and continually, in all our religious services, eyeing Jesus the Mediator and Intercessor, who alone is able to cover their defects, and render them acceptable to his Father by his abundant righteousness ; in whom alone we are complete, and safe from every impending storm. For when in him, the flaming sword of divine justice, which before kept us out of paradise, guards and assists our entrance into it. And, 3d. Let us glorify God on account of his justice of every kind, whether essential, declarative, judicatory, legislative, remunerative, or vindictive ; for transcendent beauty shines therein. Let us say with the Psalmist, "Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy throne." Ps. Ixxxix. 24. And with Paul, " 0 the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God ! his judgments are un- searchable, and his ways past finding out." Rom. xi. 33. Such is the strictness of divine justice in all his proceed- ings, that it is compared to mountains, and to the abyss. " Thy righteousness is as the great mountains, thy judg- ments are a great deep." Ps. xxxvi. 6. And let us join with the inhabitants of heaven in celebrating the justice of God. " And after these things I heard a great voice of much people, in heaven, saying, Hallelujah, salvation, and glory, and honour, and power, unto the Lord our God, for true and righteous are his judgments." Rev. xix. 1, 2. THEJUSTICEOFGOD. 33 In fine, let us labour to imitate the justice and righteous- nesB of God, by seeking the righteousness of Christ to our justification, in the manner before expressed ; also by seeking the inherent righteousness, which it pleased God at first to implant in our natures by creation (Ecc. vii. 29), which we have lost by sin. I say, let us fervently and frequently cry to God by humble supplications, in the name of Christ, that he would be pleased to implant or infuse into our souls, by regeneration, the habits or principles of that righteousness ; and, having the same im- planted, let us exercise them in our whole practice. 1. Towards God, by rendering him his due, viz: om-selves, and all that honour, love, trust, and service which he re- quires in his word. And 2. Towards our neighbour, in all matters of government, judgment, and commerce, ruling without oppression, judging without respect of per- sons, and dealing without fraud, falsehood, or imposition. And 3. Towards ourselves, in a right improvement of the seasons of mercy, thereby securing our salvation ; and also in not suJSering ourselves to be wronged in our temporal interest. A great part of the image of God, and beauty of religion, consists in justice : and as the blessing of God rests upon such here, so they shall receive from the just Judge of heaven and earth a crown of righteousness here- after, which shall never fade away. That this may be the happy lot of us all, may God grant, for Christ's sake ! Amen. SERMON II. THE DIVINE MERCY. BY THE REV. GILBERT TENNENT. "And the Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, The Lord, tho Lord God, merciful and gracious, long-suffering. — Exodcs xxxiv. 6. ***** In discoursing upon this divine attribute of mercy, it will be necessary to speak upon its nature^ kinds, SiXid properties. And 1st. Mercy, in respect of its nature, may be thus described, viz : That it is the goodness of God extended to the miserable. Here good and bad angels are excluded : the good, because they are not miserable, and the bad, because they are wholly given up to justice. "But God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness to be reserved unto judgment." 2 Pet. ii. 4. Or the mercy of God may be thus described, viz : That it is that property jf the Supreme Being whereby he is inclined to succour his creatures in misery, together with its kind effects upon them. Here observe, Ist, that the special object of mercy is the creature in misery, and thus it is distinguished from (34) THE DIVINE MERCY. 35 other attributes. Goodness considers its object as indi- genty and so communicates needed benefits, but mercy considers its object as miserable^ because of sin ; and therefore, though an innocent creature be the object of di\ane goodness and bounty, it is only a fallen and sinning creature that is the proper object of God's mercy. Grace is mercy or goodness freely dispensed, and therefore it considers its object, not only as miserable, but unworthy. Whereas, long-suffering consists in the suspension of merited vengeance, and the communication of unmerited benefits. Thus you may see that all these attributes of the Deity import the communication of some good to the creature, and are only distinguished in relation to the objects upon which they are exercised. Misery is the foil of mercy, it can have no other object ; hence it is said, that "his soul was grieved for the misery of Israel." Judg. X. 16. Undoubtedly the virtue of mercy was in God from all eternity, but there was no room or occasion for its displays, till the creature's fatal fall from God, and misery consequent upon it, proved it an object to be exercised upon. Man by sin robbed himself of his beauty and happiness, and exposed himself to all the manifold miseries of this and the next life ; all which are included in the sentence of death annexed to the breach of the first cove- nant. As man by sin had lost all right to happiness, and, on the contrary, rendered himself liable to all the threats of the divine law ; so by this he likewise became " al- together unprofitable," (Rom. iii. 1, 2,) having lost all his originel power to glorify God by active obedience, and oQ THE DIVINE MERCY. thus he had no ground from himself to expect the divine favour. 2d. Seeing the misery of fallen mankind is twofold, viz : of sin, and punishment; consequently, the operations of mercy consist in affording suitable succours under these maladies. In respect of sin, the mercy of God succours in the following instances: 1. In reconciling sinners to himself, by the blood of his only begotten Son. 2 Cor. v. 18. For the purchase of which reconciliation, the eternal Father gave his beloved Son to shame, pain and death. John iii. 16. And for the application thereof, he confers faith upon the elect, whereby they are enabled to accept and rely upon the blessed Jesus as Mediator and Reconciler. And 2. By renewing sinners by his Spirit, whereby the tyranny and dominion of sin is broken, and the people of God enabled to overcome sin, and triumph over it. " Let not sin reign in your mortal bodies, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof." Rom. vii. 12. "I thank God, through Jesus Christ our Lord." Rom. vii. 25. In respect of punishment, divine mercy succours in the following manner : 1. By bearing with the sinner for a time before judg- ment is inflicted. "What if God, willing to show his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much long-suffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction?" Rom. ix. 22. 2. By threatening punishments against the impenitent, in order to reclaim them from their trespasses. God Vrarns THEDIVINE MERCY. 37 before he wounds, and sends his servants to slay sinners by his word, before he slays them by his sword. 3. By pointing to a remedy, whereby the impending stroke of divine justice may be averted. '' At what instant I shall speak concerning a nation, and concerning a king- dom to pluck up, and to pull down, and to destroy it ; if that nation against whom I have pronounced turn from their evil, I will repent of the evil I thought to do unto them." Jer. xviii. 7, 8. If sinners repent of the evil of sin, God will avert the evil of judgment. 4. By inviting, and expostulating with, sinners to accept of the remedy proposed. " Come now, and let us reason together ; though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow ; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool." Isa. i. 18. " Thus saith the Lord, what iniquity have your fathers found in me, that they are gone far from me, and have walked after vanity and become vain ?" Jer. ii. 5. 5. By receiving into favour those that comply with the remedy, how great soever their trespasses have been, by forgiving their sins, sanctifying and sweetening their sor- rows, and supporting them under them by his Spirit, love and power. " Who forgiveth all thine iniquities, who healeth all thy diseases." Ps. ciii. 3. " And he said unto me. My grace is sufficient for thee." 2 Cor. xii. 9. " Blessed be God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies, and the God of all comfort, who comforteth us in all our tribulation." 2 Cor. i. 3, 4. And 4 88 THEDIVINE MERCY. 6. When lie begins to inflict deserved judgment, (in general,) he doth it by degrees, first he sends lighter calamities, and when those do not reclaim the sinner, he sends heavier. In the day of God's rough wind, he stays his east wind. First rods are tried, and if those do not avail, scorpions may be expected. Jehovah does not all at once stir up " all his wrath." Ps. Ixxviii. 38. But the 2d proposition was to speak of the hinds of mercy. Now the mercy of God may be said to be two-fold, viz : either common or special. Common mercy consists in con- ferring without distinction upon the children of men, the outward comforts and conveniences of life, and hence the Almighty is said to cause his sun to rise upon the evil and the good, and to send his rain upon the just and the unjust. Matt. v. 45. But the special mercy of God consists in conferring upon the elect, such things as do accompany salvation, and that through Christ, in the channel of the new covenant. " Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings, in heavenly places, in Christ." Eph. i. 3. But I proceed to the 3d proposition, which was to discourse upon the proper- ties of divine mercy. And 1. It is eternal. " The mercy of God is from ever- lasting to everlasting." Ps. ciii. 17. It is repeated twenty-six times in one psalm, " that his mercy endureth for ever." Ps. cxxxvi. And this may justly enhance our esteem of it, and desire after it. Though God may hide THEDIVINEMERCT. 39 his face for a little moment, yet with everlasting kindness will he return to his people. And 2. God's mercy is great, and hence God is said to be "plenteous in mercy." Ps. Ixxxvi. 5. "Rich in mercy." Eph. ii. 4. And, in Psalm li. 1, we read of the multitude of his "tender mercies." And in 2 Sam. xxiv. 14, his mercies are expressly said to be "great." But methinks the greatness of God's mercy appears especially by con- sidering these two things, viz : What is the sinner's due, according to strict justice, and the mitigation thereof which he enjoys in this world ? Surely " the wages of sin is death." Rom. vi. 23. Which includes all the miseries of this present life, as well as the pains of hell hereafter. Now, therefore, every mitigation of those miseries, every comfort the sinner enjoys, is mercy ; it is what the sinner has forfeited a right to ; it is what he deserves not. 3. The mercy of God is incomparable. " They say, if a man put away his wife, and she go from him and become another man's, shall he return unto her again ? But thou hast played the harlot with many lovers, yet return unto me, saith the Lord." Jer. iii. 1. The merciful God ex- ceeds his creatures both in giving and forgiving. And 1st. In giving. Our donations are often extorted from us, but He gives of his own accord, without any incentive but what is in his own bosom. Isa. Ixv. 1. We give but small gifts, but He gives the greatest, viz : Himself, his Son, his Spirit, his kingdom. Job iii. 16. We give to our friends, but Jehovah confers many dona- tions on his enemies. Matt. v. 45. 40 THEDIVINEMERCY. "We are soon weary of giving, but so is not God ; lie is unwearied in his mercy (to the penitent) ; " he giveth liber- ally and upbraideth not." James i. 5. And 2d. The merciful God exceeds his creatures in forgiving. Men are revengeful to those that wrong them, but God is "merciful and gracious, long suffering," as our text asserts. How remarkable, to this purpose, are these words of the prophet, " I will not execute the fierceness of mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim, for I am God and not man !" Hos. xi. 9. Men are difficultly drawn to forgive, and cannot forgive often ; but God is ready to pardon (Neh. ix. 17) ; and does multiply pardons. Sometimes men forgive when it is not in their power to revenge themselves, but sinners are always under God's control and within the reach of his arm. 4. The mercy of God is sure and infallible. " Incline your ear and come unto me, hear and your soul shall live ; and I will make an everlasting covenant with you, even the sure mercies of David." Isa. Iv. 3. And hence it is that the gifts and callings of God are said to be without repentance, and that the foundation of God stands sure. The Lord knoweth who are his. God's special mercy to his people is built upon the sure and invariable foundation of his purposes and promises, as well as the satisfaction and intercession of Christ. And 5. God's mercy is free. " In whom also we have ob- tained an inheritance, being predestinated, according to the purpose of him, who worketh all things after the coun- THEDIVINEMERCY. '41 sel of his own will." Eph. i. 11. Albeit the virtue of mercy belongs to God, in respect of his being, yet the dispensation of it depends entirely upon God's good pleasure, and hence the apostle Paul informs us, that " it is not of him that will- eth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy," and that " he hath mercy upon whom he will have mercy, and whom he will, he hardeneth." Rom. ix. 16, 18. Now, because when such things as are really or seemingly contrary are put together, they illustrate each other; it may not be improper, before I proceed to the improvement of this subject, to discourse upon the severity of God in his judgments, which is seemingly opposed to his mercy. Of this, mention is made in Rom. xi. 22, and in many other places of scripture; and of this there are many examples upon sacred record, such as the instance of the fallen angels, our first parents, the old world, Pharaoh, the Egyptians, Korali, Dathan, Abiram, Achan, Ananias and Sapphira, and many others. From which we may gather that God's judgments, which he exercises by his severity, are no other than singular punishments, inflicted for singular offences. The meritorious cause of them is some aggravated iniquity, the nature of which is often pointed out by the punishment inflicted, which is not common but singular. Adonibezek, who had cut off the thumbs and great toes of threescore and ten kings, was served so him- self. Judges i. 6, 7. And hence Samuel saith con- cerning Agag, that " as his sword made women childless, so his mother should be childless among women." 1 Sam. XV. 33. Hence the Lord elsewhere threatens that those 4* 42 THEDIVINEMERCT. who shed the blood of others, should themselves have blood to drink. Thus you see that the punishment does often resemble the sin that procured it. Now the judgments of God are of various kinds, viz : Spiritual or bodily, private or public. Spiritual judgments are such as these, viz : A famine of the word. Amos viii. 11, 12. Leanness and backsliding. Rev. ii. 5. Errors in judgment. " And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie." 2 Thess. ii. 10, 11. Corporal judgments are war, pestilence, famine, drought and the like. Now the procuring causes of public and epidemical judgments are such as the following, viz : Ingratitude against God. Isa. i. 3. Contempt of his word. " Who gave Jacob for a spoil, and Israel to the robbers ? did not the Lord, he against whom we have sinned ? for they would not walk in his ways, neither were they obedient unto his law." Isa. xlii. 24. Another cause of judgments, is slighting of the ministers of God. " But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his word, and mis- used his prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose against his people, till there was no remedy." 2 Chron. xxxvi. 16. Besides, pride and idolatry are procuring causes of divine judgments. " The lofty looks of man shall be humbled, and the haughtiness of men shall be brought down." Isa. ii. 11. Jer. ii. 13, 14. Likewise the following evils against our neighbour, are causes of divine judgments, viz : Op- pression of the poor. " The Lord will enter into judg- ment with the ancients of his people, and the princes thereof ; for ye have eaten up the vineyard, the spoil of the THEDIVINE MERCY. 4i poor is In your houses." Isa. iii. 14. 2d. "Wronging the widow and fatherless. " They judge not the fatherless, neither does the cause of the widow come before them." Isa. i. 23. 3d. Cheating the labourer of his hire. " Woe unto him that buildeth his house by unrighteousness, and his chambers by wrong, that useth his neighbour's service without wages, and giveth him not for his work." Jer. xxii. 13. The prophet Hosea mentions a number of causes together, in the fourth chapter of his book, verses 1, 2. " Hear the word of the Lord, ye children of Israel, for the Lord hath a controversy with the inhabitants of the land, because there is no truth, nor mercy, nor knowledge of God in the land. By swearing, and lying, and killing, and stealing, and committing adultery, they break out and blood toucheth blood, therefore shall the land mourn." To the aforesaid causes of divine judgments I may add covetousness and hypocrisy. " Woe unto them that join house to house — therefore my people are gone into captiv- ity." Isa. V. 8, 13. " 0 Assyrian, the rod of mine anger — I will send him against a hypocritical nation." Isa. x. 6. Here it may be observed, that judgments are not always sent, except the aforesaid evils become general, and are attended with impudence, after various warnings. Jer. v. 1. Isa. iii. 9. Ps. xcv. 10, 11. Now the judgments of God are always just, and sometimes unsearchable and • wonderful ; for sometimes he not only sends them on the ungodly, but upon his own people. Yea, as the apostle Peter observes, " Judgment begins at the house of God." The Lord threatened his people of old, that them only he 44 TIIEDIVINEMERCY. had known of all the families of the earth, therefore he would punish them for their iniquities. Hence David tells us, that his flesh trembled for fear of God, and that he was afraid of God's judgments. I may add that the end of God's punishments is the glory of God's holiness, the con- version and humiliation of some, and the hardening of others. Witness the prodigal, Pharaoh, and others. But it is time to proceed to the improvement of this subject. And 1st. We should be cautious of abusing God's mercy ; let us beware that we suck not poison out of that sweet flower. To take encouragement to go on in sin, because of God's mercy, is the vilest instance of ingratitude, and justly exposes to an aggravated condemnation ; abused mercy turns into enraged fury and vengeance. "If he bless himself, saying, I shall have peace, though I walk after the imagination of my heart, to add drunkenness to thirst ; the Lord will not spare him, but the anger of the Lord and his jealousy shall smoke against that man, and all the curses that are written in this book shall lie upon him." Deut. xxix. 19. 2d. The mercy of God offers encouragement and sup- port to the people of God, in all their distresses, whether outward or inward. Are they afilicted with outward straits ? The merciful God, who is their Shepherd, will not suffer them to want, but make their bread and water sure. He that hears and feeds the ravens, will surely hear and help his children. Have they backslidden from God, and are they labouring to be sorrowfully sensible thereof? Then ' THEDIVINE MERCY. 45 may tliey encourage themselves in this, that all God's ways are mercy and truth, and that the mercy of Jehovah endureth for ever. He will begin and end with mercy, and such as are under the first convictions of sin may take encouragement from the mercy of God, which is great above the heavens, and most freely dispensed upon the vilest creatures. Mercy considers not what one deserves, but what he needs. God is more inclined to mercy than wrath. Justice and judgment is his strange work, but mercy is his delight. Micah vii. 18. "It is delightful to the mother," saith Chrysostom, " to have her breasta drawn ; so it is to God to have the breasts of his mercy drawn." The Almighty is slow to anger, but ready to forgive. Ps. Ixxxvi. 5. Let us, therefore, entertain honour- able thoughts of God's mercy, and trust in it for ever. Ps. lii. 8. What greater encouragement can there be to believe, than the mercy of God ? Mercy is one of the most orient pearls of the crown of God ; he reckons it his glory to be conferring pardons upon penitent transgressors ; and, there- fore, he invites poor sinners to come and lay hold on his mercy. " Whosoever will, let him come and take of the water of life freely." Rev. xxii. 17. Mercy woos sinners in the most importunate, moving and condescending strains. " Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money ; come ye, buy and eat : come, buy wine and milk without money and without price." Isa. Iv. 1. And what joy does the Almighty express, when sinners accept of the proposals of his mercy ! when the prodigal son returned from his wanderings, how much did 46 THEDIVINEMERCY. * it please the indulgent father, who made a feast to express his joy on that occasion ! We should be induced to inquire into the state of our souls, in order to know whether we have an interest in the special mercy of God or not. For it will be miserable and ruining to us in the issue, if we content ourselves with com- mon mercies. Now we may be helped to determine this important point, by an impartial comparing of ourselves with the following particulars, viz : 1. Those who have an interest in the special mercy of God, have been (if of adult age when converted) made sensible of their misery without it, and their unworthiness of it, with the prodigal and publican. 2. They have been stirred up to solicitous inquiries, how they might obtain an interest therein. Acts ii. 37. 3. Such have, deliberately and without reserve, consented to embrace Christ Jesus (the fountain of mercy) in all his offices and relations, and resolved to bear his cross and obey his laws. Job i. 12. 4. And, in consequence hereof, they find the general bias of their afi'ections going towards God, and an habitual carefulness to do the things that are pleasing to him. Now, those who, upon examination, find themselves destitute of the aforesaid characters, should, in order to obtain mercy, 1. Think seriously of all the kindnesses of heaven towards them, together with their innumerable sins against those mercies, and the dangers to which they are thereby exposed. 2. Attend with diligence upon the preached word ; for it is by the foolishness of preaching that God saves those THEDIVINEMERCT. 47 that believe. 3. Bewail your sins against the mercies of God; let the goodness of God lead you to repentance. 4. Try to reform your lives. " Let the wicked forsake his way, and the ungodly man his thoughts, and let him turn unto the Lord, for he will have mercy upon him, and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon." And, 5. Pray earnestly and frequently to God for mercy, in the name of Christ, with fear and hope. And let me exhort those that have obtained the special mercy of God to walk worthy of it. 1. Praise God for his mercy in the Psalmist's language : " Bless the Lord, 0 my soul, and all that is, within me bless his holy name." Ps. ciii. 1. Such as have been monuments of mercy, should be trumpets of praise. 2. Love God. Mercy is a powerful excitant to this. " I will love thee, 0 Lord, my strength." Ps. xviii. 1. Surely that heart is harder than marble and adamant, which mercy will not melt. " I would hate my own soul, (saith Austin,) if I did not find it loving God." We should love God for outward comforts, but much more for special and enduring mercies. 3. Let us imitate the mercy of God, in showing mercy to our fellow creatures. God is the Father of mercy, show yourselves to be his children by being like him. It '"was a just observation of Ambrose, " that the sum of re- ligion is to be rich in works of mercy." 0 let the lamp of our profession be filled with the oil of mercy ! And to this our dear Lord exhorts us, "Be merciful, as your Father also is merciful." Matt. vi. 36. But let the 48 THEDIVINEMERCT. despisers and abusers of mercy, who go on in a course of any of the evils before mentioned, which procure the judg- ments of God, be entreated to repent, and reform speedily, otherwise ye may expect the dreadful effects of divine severity in some or all of the instances thereof before expressed. By your ungrateful return for mercies received, " you treasure up wrath against the day of wrath, and the revelation of the righteous judgment of God." Though God be gracious and merciful, slow to wrath, yet will he by no means clear the guilty. SERMON III. THE GRACE OF GOD. BY THE REV. GILBERT TENNENT. "And the Lord passed by before him, and proclaimed, The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, long-suffering. — Exodus xxxiv. 6. The next divine attribute that comes now, according to the order of our text, to be considered, is the grace of G-od. " The Lord is merciful and gracious." There is nothing more frequently mentioned in Scrip- ture, than the grace of God. I shall mention but a few passages, for if I should take notice of all, I must trans- cribe a great part of the Bible. " To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he has made us accepted in the beloved." Eph. i. 6. " He is gracious and full of com- passion." Ps. cxii. 14. " The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, be with you all." 2 Cor. xiii. 14. In speaking upon this subject, I purpose I. To explain its nature. , II. Show its kinds. III. Mention some considerations, serving to manifest its sovereignty and glory. 5 (49) 50 THEGRACEOFGOD. lY. Consider what is really and seemingly opposed thereto, and then proceed to some improvement. I. I return to consider the first proposed, which was to explain the nature of the grace of God. Now, the word grace signifies something that is free, as was observed in the preceding sermon, and it is taken two ways, either for an attribute of God, which is in God, or for the gift of God, which is from God. In the first sense, the grace of God signifies his free and sovereign benevolence, by which he peculiarly favours and doth good to his creatures, whence God is called gracious, as in our text, i. e. endued with grace ; as from his goodness he is called good, and from his justice, just. The gifts of God, which are the effects of the grace that is in him, are metonymically called grace, especially such of them as are peculiar and special, i. e. such as are conferred upon some, rather than others. Hence, some divines observe, that the word grace intends either, 1. The grace freely giving (Mat. xi. 26), which they term {gratiam gratis dantem), or the free favour of God ; or the grace freely given, which they call {gratiam gratis datam). And this imports any kind of benefits which the Almighty confers upon his creatures, whether good or bad, which makes them not in the least the more acceptable to God ; or, 3. The grace which makes acceptable, which they term [gratiam gratum facientem\ viz: all the saving gifts of God, faith, hope, charity, by which we please him. Now, the grace of God may be thus described, viz : that it is a property of the Deity, whereby he is inclined to THEGRACEOFQOD. 51 dispense undeserved kindnesses upon his creatures freelj, and in a sovereign way. The dispensations of grace have no dependence upon any dignity or merit of creatures, upon whom benefits are conferred (Rom. xi. 6.); but the whole reason thereof is the good pleasure of God's will, (Matt. xi. 26,) which respects all creatures, even to the noblest angels. Whatever any of these enjoy, they have it of grace ; for who, among all created beings, has first given to God, " and it shall be recompensed to him again ?" Rom. xi. 35. In the meantime, these things are more properly and peculiarly ascribed to grace, which are different from nature. Nature and grace should not be confounded: such things as by the kind constitution of God, belong to every creature, according to their difierent kinds, are not usually called grace, because, though they be undue, yet they belong to nature. But to make this more plain, let us consider 11. The kinds of grace : and here it may be observed, that grace is three-fold, viz : universal, common, and saving. And 1. Universal grace is that, whereby Jehovah dispenses natural things upon all his creatures. And hence he is called the " Saviour of men." 1 Tim. iv. 10. And is said to "preserve man and beast." Ps. xxxvi. 6. He causes his sun to rise upon the fields of the evil and the good, and sends his rain upon the just and unjust. He gives to man life, health, strength, and all the supports he enjoys therein, all which, being undeserved, may be called grace : 52 THEGRACEOFGOD. but according to the usage of scripture and antiquity, they seldom and less properly bear that name. 2, Common grace consists in the communication of moral good things upon men promiscuously, whether they be good or bad, elect or not elect ; such as natural wisdom and prudence, and all the train of moral virtues, in which even some pagans have excelled. And to these we may add, all outward religious privileges and means of grace; together with those transient eifects which are sometimes produced by them upon the unregenerate, such as some kind of illumination, and stirrings of religious aifections. In a word, all those common operations of the Holy Spirit which are not followed by an habitual and saving change, must be ascribed hereto. Of these mention is made in Heb. vi. 4 — 6, and also in the parable of the sower: " But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it ; yet hath he not root in himself, but dureth for a while, for when tribulation or persecution ariseth because of the word, by and by he is offended." Matt. xiii. 20, 21. But 3. Savincf grace is that undue or undeserved love of God, whereby he confers upon the elect only, saving benefits, of his own mere good pleasure. Here observe First. That it is love, or the kind inclination or pro- pension of God's will, to communicate good to his elect. Secondly. It is undue, undeserved love. The objects of this love, considered as creatures, can merit no good at the hand of God. Seeing they have received their all from him, surely they cannot put the Almighty in their debt, THEGRACEOFGOD. 53 by giving him what is his own ; and considered as sinners, who, by their voluntary transgression, have fallen short of his glory, they deserve his high and dreadful displeasure. Thirdly. It is distinguishing love, manifested to the elect in a sovereign way, according to the good pleasure of God's will. Eph. i. 9. That is given to one which is denied to another, and only because it is God's pleasure ; hence is that query of one of Christ's disciples, " Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself to us, and not unto the world?" John xiv. 22. And does not our Lord him- self thank his eternal Father for the displays of his sovereignty in this respect ? "I thank thee, 0 Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes ; even so. Father, for so it seemed good in thy sight." Matt. xi. 25, 26. It is but a few, a remnant of the fallen race of mankind, upon whom God is pleased to vouchsafe, and in whom he is pleased to glorify, his special grace. Luke xiii. 24. Rom. ix. 2, 7. " Esaias crieth also concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved." Fourthly. It is efficacious love, which confers saving benefits ; hence it is called, " the grace of God, which bringeth salvation." Tit. ii. 11. And the blessings it vouchsafes, are termed " things that accompany salva- tion." Heb. vi. 9. And hence the Psalmist prays, "Re- member me, 0 Lord, with the favour that thou bearest unto thy people. 0 visit me with thy salvation ; that I may see the good of thy chosen, that I may rejoice in the glad- 6* 54 THEGRACEOFGOD. ness of thy nation, that I may glory with thine inherit- ance." Ps. cvi. 4. And here it may be necessary to ob- serve particularly, that divine love confers freely upon the elect, or concerts for them, the following important bene- fits, viz : 1. Election ; this is free and gracious, without faith or works foreseen. " Even so then, at this present time also, there is a remnant according to the election of grace." Rom. xi. 5. " Having predestinated us, unto the adop- tion of children, by Jesus Christ, to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will." Eph. i. 5. " If by grace, then is it no more of works, otherwise grace is no more grace, * * and work is no more work." Rom. xi. 6. To the same effect the apostle elsewhere observes, that "it is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy." Rom. ix. 16. It is inconsistent with the independency and immutability of God, to sup- pose that anything without him should alter or incline his will. 2. Redemption is likewise of free grace. The contri- vance of this scheme of happiness, as well as the sending of the blessed Son of God to effect it, by his obedience and sufferings, were marvellous displays of the Father's pure affection to a miserable world. " Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins." 1 John vi. 10. And to what else than free grace can we ascribe God the Father's acceptance of the suretiship of Christ in the sin- ner's room and place ? Strict justice certainly demands TIIEGRACEOFGOD. 65 personal satisfaction ; and does not the love of Christ pass knowledge, in that he who is over all, God blessed for ever, came into a state of the worst abasement, voluntarily to save worthless dust from perpetual ruin ? How sweetly does the Apostle Paul speak to this effect : " For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich!" 2 Cor. viii. 9. Besides, it may be here observed, that redemption by the satisfaction of Christ is frequently, in Scripture, restrained to a certain number, who are called the people of God, the sheep of Christ, and such as were given him by his Father. Matt. i. 21. John X. 15 ; xvii. 9. Albeit the blood of the Son of God be of infinite value, and, therefore, the satisfaction made by it may, in this respect, be said to be universal ; yet, inasmuch as it was neither the design of the Father, nor the Son, that it should be spent for all, so as to be saved by it, it is, there- fore, to be referred to singular grace. Moreover, 3. The application of redemption in all its branches, is of free grace, as may appear by the following induction of particulars, viz : Effectual calling is said to be according to God's pur- pose. Rom. viii. 29. Faith is called the gift of God. " For by grace are ye ''saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God." Eph. ii. 8. Conversion is not of flesh nor blood, nor of the will of man, but of God. None of these graces which I have 56 THEGRACEOFGOD. mentioned, are the fi-uits of free will ; " for we are not sufficient to think any thing as of ourselves, but our sufficiency is of God." 2 Cor. iii. 5. No, they are all the fruits of the Spirit (Gal. v. 22), who produces them not by moral suasion, like poor creatures, but by an almighty, creating power, taking away the stony heart, and giving a heart of flesh. 1 Cor. iii. 5, 6. Ps. li. 10. Ezek. xxxvi. 26, 27. And Justification, whereby an elect sinner is freed from the guilt of sin and hath a right to eternal happiness, is of free grace. " Being justified freely by his grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus." Rom. iii. 24. It is entirely without works. "Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ — for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified." Gal. ii. 16. Our adoption, or right, to the important privileges of children, and joint heirship with Christ, is also of pure grace. " Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children, by Jesus Christ, to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, to the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved." Eph. i. 5, 6. Our salvation, in regard to the right thereto, is of grace. And, hence, eternal life is said to be "the gift of God through Jesus Christ our Lord." Rom. vi. 23. And, else- where, we are said expressly to be " saved by grace," Eph. ii. 8, In the meantime it should be remembered, that good works are the way to the kingdom, though they TfiEGRACEOFGOD. 57 be not the cause of our reigning, as Barnard of old observed, " Though our right to happiness is of grace, as was before observed, yet the Almighty hath, by his gracious constitution, so ordered the matter, that good works are necessary to the possession of it." Matt. xxv. 21, 34, 35. I proceed III. To mention some considerations serving to mani- fest the sovereignty and glory of God's grace. And 1. Methinks the glory of divine grace appears by considering the author of it, who is a being infinitely and invariably happy in himself, as well as essentially and eternally glorious ; and so neither needs the services of creatures, nor can be benefitted by them. Our goodness extends not to him, neither is it any gain to the Almighty, that we are righteous. To acknowledge God's glory, adds no more to its lustre, than speaking well of the natural sun adds to its beauty. It may be here also observed, that Jehovah would have had millions of angels to celebrate his praise and execute his pleasure, although he had made his justice triumph in the ruin of the whole human race, which, certainly, he might have done. Or, he could have formed innumerable creatures of a more noble order than any of the creation to celebrate the glory of his attributes, if it had so pleased his Majesty: for he is almighty in power, hath the residue of the Spirit, and can raise up children even out of the stones to Abraham. But 2. Let us consider the object upon which this divine grace is conferred, and we shall find 58 THEGRACEOFGOD. First. That it is man, not angels. Our Saviour took not on him the nature of angels, but the seed of Abra- ham ; because he designed to save the one, and to reserve those that fell of the other, in chains under darkness, unto the judgment of the great daj. What is man but dust and ashes ? A worm that is crushed before the moth, altogether unworthy of the kind notice of the great and glorious God. How amazing is the distinguishing grace of God in passing by creatures of a higher order, and fixing his love upon man ! Secondly. It is sinners upon whom divine grace is con- ferred. Man, by creation, was but dust, but by sin he is become polluted dust, and so odious and loathsome, as well as wretched and miserable. And this doleful state he has wilfully brought himself into, and wilfully continues in, against all the remonstrances of conscience, against all the kind importunities of a condescending God and Saviour. Man by sin has brought this twofold misery upon himself: 1. That he deserves no good, and, 2. That he deserves all evil. How can these deserve good at the hand of God, whose persons and performances are covered with deformity and pollution ? Indeed, we deserve not the least common mercy, how much less, then, can we merit special benefits ? "I am not worthy of the least of all the mercies, and of all the truth, thou hast showed unto thy servant." Gen. xxxii. 10. Men in a state of nature are unprofitable creatures, they are neither prepared to receive benefits, nor able to prepare themselves, seeing they are dead in sins and trespasses. And by their multi- THEGRACEOPGOD. 59 plied impieties they deserve the divine displeasure, and provoke him to inflict it. As they are children of wrath by nature, so they weary the Almighty by continued iniquities in practice. Eph. ii. 3. Isa. xliii. 24. And Thirdly. The persons to whom divine grace is given, are enemies to God, both in their minds and lives. " The carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." Rom. viii. 7. Now, enmity imports a high degree of fixed and implaca- ble spite. 0 dreadful state ! This inward enmity unre- generate sinners bewray by their rebellion against God in practice, and cruel confederacies with his declared enemies. " And you that were sometime alienated, and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled." Col. i. 21. Fourthly. It is generally the poorer and meaner sort of men, that are favoured with divine grace, while the rich, honourable, and great are passed by. Many who make a considerable figure in the world, by the keenness of their natural and acquired endowments, and by the splendour of their outward circumstances, are entirely destitute of special grace, while others, who are poor and despised, are favoured therewith. This subject the apostle Paul discourses largely upon. " Not many mighty, not many noble are called ; but God hath chosen the foolish things of the world, to confound the wise, and the weak things of the world, to confound the things that are mighty; and base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, and things 60 TIIEGRACEOFGOD. that are not, to bring to nought things that are." 1 Cor. i. 26—28. Fifthly. Many of those to whom divine grace is given were, before conversion, notorious sinners, some blasphemers, persecutors and injurious. These things the apostle Paul ascribes to himself ; he shut up many of the saints in prison, consented to their death, punished them in every synagogue, compelled them to blaspheme, and being exceeding mad against them, he persecuted them to strange cities. Acts xxvi. 10, 11. 1 Tim. i. 13, 15. Some, before conversion, have been idolators, as the Ephesians. Some, fornicators, adulterers, effeminate, abusers of themselves with mankind, thieves, covetous, drunkards, revilers, extortioners. Such were some of the Corinthians, and yet they were washed, sanctified, justified. 1 Cor. vi. 9, 11. 0 rich and glorious grace ! How admirable is the grace of God, in the instance of Manas- seh's conversion ! who, though a conjurer, a murderer, and one who despised God, and bid defiance to heaven in prosperity, yet when, in adversity, he humbled himself and made supplication to Jehovah, was graciously heard and accepted. 2 Chron. xxxiii. 9, 12, 13. I shall only add the famous instance of Mary Magdalene, who was a notorious sinner. This poor woman loved much, because much was forgiven her; her heart was so melted with a sense of divine goodness, that she could wash our Lord's feet with her tears. Luke vii. 3. The glory of divine grace appears, not only from its author and object, but also from the season in which it is THEGRACEOFGOD. Gl vouchsafed. The Almighty bestows benefits upon his people, at such seasons when they are most suitable. In the mount of difficulty and distress the Lord is seen, yea, he is a very present help in trouble. When sinners have wearied themselves in the greatness of their way, and through a series of disappointments are brought to the last extremity, the blessed God manifests his grace and mercy. And thus when gracious persons are encircled with manifold miseries outward and inward, and their sorrowful hearts are ready to sink into despondency, Avith a long continued, oppressive weight of woe, from which they can hardly see any way of deliverance ; when they are desolate and afflicted, their hearts almost overwhelmed, then Jehovah sends deliverance ; " and they are as those that dreamed." Ps. XXV. 16, 17. When the compassionate Jehovah returns to his people, after their sinful wanderings from him. Oh ! it makes them admire the pure and glorious riches of divine grace. And truly the Lord teaches his people more and more of this doctrine, namely, the freeness of his grace, while they are in the world. 4. The freeness of divine grace appears likewise from the manner in which divine benefits are conferred; e. g., we contribute nothing to the change wrought upon us by conversion. The natural bias of our wills is against it, and this reluctance and opposition remains, until it be overcome by the almighty power of God, who is hence said to make his people " a willing people in the day of his power." Ps. ciii. That alteration of dispositions which is implied in conversion, is not desired by the 6 62 THEGRACEOFGOD. sinner before it ; though unregenerate sinners desire to be delivered from misery, yet they do not desire to be delivered from sin, the cause of it. For that is as their right eye, and right arm. Well then, seeing those benefits whereby the soul is sanctified are undeserved, un- desired, yea, opposed by the unconverted, surely then they must be freely vouchsafed. 5. The riches of divine grace appear from the nature of the benefits conferred, which are attended with these two following properties, viz : freedom from the greatest evils, and a right to, and possession of, the greatest good. Sin- ners, while in a state of unregeneracy, are immersed in, and exposed to, the greatest evils, both moral and penal. They are under the dominion of sin, and all over tainted by it ; and by reason thereof, they are exposed to the curse and wrath of God in this and the next world. They are in a dungeon of darkness and distress, in a pit in which there is no water ; bound and shackled with the heavy curse of God, void of light and beauty, and covered with the basest deformity. Now the benefits of divine grace bring the sinner from this depth of woe, loose his shackles, and release him out of prison. Hereby he is freed from the guilt of sin, through the righteousness of Christ imputed to him, and hereby he is freed from the dominion of it, through the sanctifying influences of the Holy Spirit ; and as he is thus freed from the greatest evils by divine grace, so he is thereby entitled to, and made a possessor of, the greatest good, both physical and moral, being made a partaker of the divine love, and THEGRACEOFGOD. 63 beautified with the divine image, viz : holiness. By the former, he is refreshed, and by the latter adorned. And as he is under the unerring conduct and almighty protec- tion of God here, so he is entitled to the perfect enjoyment of God hereafter ; which is the greatest good, that it is possible for a creature to receive. I proceed to the IV. Proposition, which was to consider what is really and seemingly opposed to the grace of God. Now, the things that are opposed really are these two, viz : nature and merit. And, 1. Nature. Hereby we are children of wrath, "being dead in trespasses and sins." Eph. ii. 1, 3. By nature we have blind minds and stony hearts, neither discern the things that be of God, nor are willing to be subject thereto. "The natural man understands not the things of the Spirit of God, neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." 1 Cor. ii. 14. "The carnal mind is enmity against God; it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." Rom. viii. 7. Nature, in its present fallen and corrupt state, fights against the grace of God as long as it can; and, therefore, that citadel of man's heart must be taken by storm, if the King of glory takes possession of it. And, 2. The papal doctrine of the merit of works, in the business of justification, directly opposes the grace of God. For grace is undue and undeserved love, as was shown before. " We conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. If it be of works, it is no more of grace, otherwise work would be no more work, and grace would be no more grace." Rom. iii. 28. But to proceed, 64 TIIEGRACEOFGOD. 3. The wrath of God is seemingly opposed to grace. Now, the wrath of God is no other than his vindictive justice, or disposition to punish the guilty, which includes three things : First. A purpose of punishing the transgressor. " For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven, against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness." Rom. i. 18. Secondly. It includes the denunciation of the aforesaid purpose by threatenings. " God is angry with the wicked every day ; if he turn not, he will whet his sword ; he hath bent his bow, and made it ready. He hath also prepared for him the instruments of death ; he ordaineth his arrows against the persecutors." Ps. vii. 11 — 13. Thirdly. It includes the execution of the threatenings, by all kinds of revenge and judgments. "Let no man deceive you with vain words, for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobe- dience" (Eph. V. 6.); that is, fruits and effects of wrath in diyine judgments. Sin wrongs the Almighty by insulting his sovereignty and legislative authority, by contradicting his unspotted holiness, and by slighting the riches of his goodness. By sin God is wronged, and robbed of that tribute of honour and service which is due to him from all created beings, by the strongest claims of right, viz : creation, preservation, provision ; and some are under the additional engagement of redeeming love. It is sin, therefore, that stirs up the divine wrath ; and because there be various aggravations of sin, therefore. TIIEGRACEOFGOD. 65 there are various degrees of wratli excited thereby and proportioned thereto. And hence, the Scriptures, speaking after the manner of men, make mention of God ^ hot displeasure, fury and rage. Ps. vi. 1. "Therefore, •will I also deal in fury ; mine eye shall not spare, neither ■will I have pity, and though they cry in mine ears with a loud voice, yet I will not hear them." Ezek. viii. 18. "Cast abroad the rage of thy wrath." Job xl. 11. These expressions do not signify any tumult of passion in God, for he is incapable of passion, being simple, immutable and perfect. They serve, therefore, only to represent the great contrariety of the nature of God to sin, as well as the more dreadful effects of his wrath upon heinous trans- gressors. But in the meantime, it may be observed, that the wrath of God, in every instance of it, is terrible and irresistible, because it proceeds from an infinite and al- mighty God. And hence, it is compared to a "burning fire," and to a whirlwind that sweeps all before it. Zeph. i. And except repentance intervene, it will be continual and eternal. Although the doctrine of free grace has been abused into licentiousness by some sordid spirits, which the apostle Paul mentions with great abhorrence, " Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound ? God forbid," (Rom.vi. 1, 2,) yet its design and tendency is to promote the contrary. And indeed nothing more powerfully incites an ingenuous mind to holiness than the consideration of God's free and distinguishing grace. And here it is to be noted, that though Almighty God gives his grace freely, 6* 66 THEGRACEOFGOD. • that so no creature should have occasion of boasting: or glorying in his presence, yet, ordinarily, he vouchsafes it in the use of appointed means; that so there may be no umbrage for negligence, but, on the contrary, all that excitement to duty, which can consist with the divine sovereignty. These things are excellently represented in the thirty-sixth chapter of Ezekiel, from the twenty-sixth to the thirty-seventh verse. Though the Almighty promises to confer saving benefits, yet he tells them, that for all these things he will be enquired of by them. But it is time to offer a word of improvement. And 1. From what has been said we may learn, that all those doctrines which ascribe any part of our salvation to our endeavours, as meritorious causes thereof, are very derogatory to the glory of God, and the design of his gospel ; which is to magnify the exceeding riches of God's grace. Eph. i. Such who seek after righteousness, as it were, by the works of the law, are not like to attain it. Justification is not to be attained by a dependence upon our endeavours, we must come to God as beggars, and ask an alms of free grace, otherwise we shall be re- jected. 2. We should examine ourselves, whether we are par- takers of God's special grace, in the instances before men- tioned, of effectual calling, faith, justification, conversion, adoption ; have we by these things been brought, to a high prizing of Christ above all others, to a child-like familiar- ity with God, to an habitual, holy, humble, heavenly, and loving temper of mind, and course of behaviour ? If so, let THEGRACEOFGOD. 67 US rejoice in Christ Jesus in all outward distresses, let us ever admire the sovereign and distinguishing grace of God, and give to God the glory of it in heart, speech and practice. But such of you as have not found the aforesaid experiences, rejoice not for joy, as other people, for ye have gone a whoring from God. Let your laughter be turned into mourning, and your joy into heaviness. Cry frequent- ly and earnestly to God for sovereign, saving grace, and rest in no duties or ordinances short of it. Is the grace of God free? Then the greatest trans- gressors should not despair of God's mercy ; though your iniquities rival the stars for multitude, and in their aggra- vations are red as crimson and scarlet, yet free grace can easily blot them out, as a thick cloud, and make them white as snow. Therefore let sensible sinners be en- couraged to come to, and believe in, the God of grace, for where sin has abounded, there grace has much more abounded. The greater your transgressions are, the greater glory God will get to his grace in forgiving them. The Psalmist was aware of this, and therefore pled with God to pardon his iniquities, because they were exceeding great. And methinks the doctrine of free grace should power- fully induce us to humility, seeing that it is God only who has made us to differ from others, and that we have nothing but what we have received. We are his debtors for all we have in hand or hope. The nature of grace supposes the object upon whom it is vouchsafed unworthy of it. A 68 THEGRACEOFGOD. continued, humbling sense of this would as much conduce to our benefit as ornament. And, seeing the good God is pleased to heap many undeserved kindnesses freely upon us, why should we not imitate his grace by conferring benefits upon our fellow creatures, without any regard to dignity, or hopes of a reward from them ? By this we should glorify God, and convince others that we are his children. In fine, let me, in the name of the gracious God, my Lord and Master, earnestly beseech poor sinners of every order to hasten, as for their lives, to that fountain of grace that is in Christ. Think not to put the Almighty in your debt by your doings, for if grace be not free, it is not grace. Sinners, abuse not the grace of God by delays and other impieties, or expect his inflamed wrath to avenge the ingratitude. "Let the wicked man forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts, and turn unto God, and he will have mercy on him, and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon." I add no more at present. May the almighty and gracious God bless his word that has been offered in his name to our special and enduring benefit! Amen. SERMON IV. THE WISDOM OF GOD IN REDEMPTION. BY THE REV. GILBERT TENNENT. "But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbling block, and unto the Greeks foolishness; but unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God." — 1 Cob. i. 23, 24. The apostle observes in the preceding verses, with great beauty and propriety, that, " in the wisdom of God, the world by wisdom knew not Grod." The gentile sages, by the mere dint of reason and philosophy, could not form consistent notions of the Supreme Being, or how to obtain his favour. A deluge of the most absurd polythe- ism and gross profaneness overspread the greatest part of the infidel tribes, before the light of the gospel shone among them ; no object was so despicable, as not to be thought worthy of divine honours ; no vice so detestable, as not only to obtain in common conversation, but even to be admitted into their religious rites, and most solemn acts of worship ; yea, to give sanction to the most brutish and crimson iniquities, they ascribed them to the gods (69) 70 THEWISDOMOFGOD they adored, as the learned Arnobius observes, with equal justice and elegance. It is true, the corruption was not so universal, but that some noble souls raised themselves above the common level ; they bewailed, and contemned the stupidity and credulity of the multitude, yet their number was small, and the efficacy of their singular sentiments even upon themselves but little ; the effect of their discernment was but a state of perpetual scepticism, a floating in doubtful uncertainty between all opinions, discarding what was manifestly wrong, but not fixing their minds in what was good and right. Yea, in matters of moral good and evil, though some of the rules they have left us are truly excellent, yet in many important things they are very deficient ; there is a deep silence in their writings of the nature and obli- quity of several vices, such as pride, revenge, and self- murder ; they are likewise silent about the right principle of action, love to God ; the right end of action, the glory of God ; the right mode of action, humility and dependence upon God, for light, strength and acceptance. They were also at a loss respecting the gaining the friendship of the Almighty when offended, the certainty of a future state, and the strict account they must render of all their actions, to the sovereign Lord and Judge of the universe. Are not these things of inexpressible importance, the very governing principles of a Christian's conduct V This melancholy ignorance of the pagan mas- ters was, doubtless, the source of that uncertainty they bewray in their discourses, and such inconsistency in their INREDEMPTION. 71 lives, concerning which, one of the greatest and best judges among them, viz : Tullj, speaks thus, " Do you think," says he, " that these things [meaning the precepts of morality] had any influence upon those men, (except only a very few,) that thought, and wrote, and disputed about them ? no ; who is there of all the philosophers, whose mind and manners were conformable to right reason? who ever made his philosophy the law and rule of his life, and not a mere boast and show of his wit and parts ? who ob- served his own instructions, and lived in obedience to his own precepts? On the contrary, many of them were slaves to filthy lusts." Nay, even the things which they themselves knew, they had not authority enough to inculcate upon men's minds with such impression as to influence and govern their con- duct; the truths they proved by a train of speculative reasonings were destitute of more sensible authority to enforce them with energy in practice; the precepts they proposed wanted weight, and evidently appeared to be no more than the precepts of men. This was, doubtless, the reason that none of the philosophers were ever able to work any remarkable change in the minds and lives of their hearers ; nor does it appear in history that any of the followers of Socrates were ever so convinced by his instructions of the excellency of virtue, and the certainty and value of its final reward, as to be Avilling to lay down their lives for its sake, as innumerable disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ have done, with the greatest gladness and heroic fortitude. The truth is, the philosophers them- 72 T II E W I S D 0 M 0 F « 0 D selves were seiwiblc of the defect of their own rules in this particular, and, therefore, confess tliat human nature wan strangely corrupted, and that this corruption was a diH«;:iHe whose cause they knew not, and for which they could not find a sufficient remedy. Ho that the great duties of religion and virtue were propoHf^d hy tliem aw matters of speculation, rather than rules of practice: not so much urged upon men's hearts and live.*-;, ;ih proposed to tlicir a fully satisfied, and the former exceedingly magnifie(? These amiable attributes, in this mediatorial plan, jo"'/ in friendly harmony, to pro- mote and secure the penitent and believing sinner's per- petual happiness. Nor is it unbecoming the majesty of God, to accept a returning sinner, when a mediator of in- finite dignity intercedes for him. The purity of God is not in the least degree disparaged by his clemency to transgressors, seeing the blessed Mediator is a principle and pattern of holiness to all that believe in him, and the truth of God, engaged to issue the thret^cenings of the broken law, is, by the sufferings of the siiiner's surety, preserved inviolate. So that all the divine perfections concur herein, and express, to the eternal astonishment and delight of men and angels, inexpressible charms, beauty and magnificence. Here we may see the glory of the blessed God shining in the face of the venerable and dear Lord Jesus Christ. Who can fathom the un- searchable depths of this amazing wisdom ? Who can un- fold the boundless riches and treasures of this mysterious prodigy and miracle of mercy — this inexpressible, trans- cendent, incomprehensible and glorious grace and love ? 80 TUEWISDOMOFGOD Surely, no understanding, either human or angelical, is equal to this province ; it is only the same infinite mind that concerted this illustrious scheme of salvation hy a Redeemer, that can comprehend it. The angels, those great ministers that attend the throne of God, stoop down with the deepest attention, the strong- est desire, and noblest pleasure, to behold the rich and un- searchable variety of manifold wisdom and glorious grace that is herein contained. But though we cannot compre- hend the depths of redeeming goodness, yet we may appre- hend so much as to be thereby powerfully influenced to admiration, love and obedience ; so much as to be thereby excited to cry out in the apostle's language, " 0 the depths of the riches, both of the knowledge and wisdom of God ! how unsearchable are his judgments, and his ways past finding out !" Surely, the "love of Christ passeth know- ledge." But, more particularly, The wisdom of God appears eminently in taking occasion from the sin of our progenitor, to bring a greater tribute of honour to God, and greater benefit to man, than if he had never transgressed. Sin naturally tends to God's dishonour and to the creature's ruin ; but, contrary to its natural tendency, it is overruled by a wise providence to be the occasion of the greatest glory to God and good to man ; so that " out of the eater comes forth meat, and out of the strong, sweetness;" as a medicine is extracted out of a poison by the alembic ; or as the black ground in a picture, though in itself it contaminates, yet when fixed, with judgment, in its proper place as a shade, heightens I INREDEMPTION. 81 the lustre of the brightest colours, and adds to the beauty of the whole piece. Dear sirs, the glory of God is more illustriously apparent, in the recovery of fallen man, than if he had never sinned. Had Adam persevered inviolably in his duty and allegiance to his great Creator and Sovereign, he could only hav^ been the subject of divine goodness, but not in its highest and most endearing acts, which are to pity and succour the guilty and miserable. Had he transgressed, and redemption not have taken place, justice, it is true, would have been honoured with a solemn sacrifice, a solemn triumph ; but mercy, that amiable, benign, and indulgent attribute, would have been veiled with a total eclipse. But now the wisdom of Jehovah in the redemp- tion of man appears, by according these attributes, and making them shine with rival charms. The honour of Jehovah appears as much in preserving the authority of his law, by punishing our surety in our room and place, as by the exercise of his mercy in pardoning the trans- gressor. Nor is it less honourable, my brethren, to the divine wisdom, to restore fallen man with infinite advantaore : though innocent man was holy, yet sad experience verifies, that he was mutably so ; but holiness in the redeemed shall be perpetual, eternal. Adam's stock was in his own hand, and hence he became a bankrupt ; but ours is in the hands of an almighty surety, who has undertaken for us, and will be faithful to his trust. Justice itself being satisfied becomes our friend, and ascertains our possession 82 THEWISDOMOFGOD of paradise. I might add, that there are graces to be acted by us in our fallen state, for which there were no objects or occasions in innocence : such as compassion to the miserable, forgiveness of injuries, and patience ; all which, being emblems of the divine perfections, must, of consequence, be ornamental to, and perfective of, our im- mortal souls, in conforming them to the great pattern and original of beauty and excellency. Again, the wisdom of God appears in appointing such a mediator as is suitably qualified to reconcile God to man, and man to God ; a mediator, that is God and man in one person, and therefore capable of the affections and sentiments of both the parties to be reconciled. The wisdom of the divine constitution in appointing a person to mediate, who is possessed of the divine and human natures, appears more particularly from the three offices he exercises in that character, viz : Prophetical, Priestly, and Kingly. Considered as a Prophet, it was necessary that the me- diator should be God, that he might deliver instructions with more authority and efficacy ; it is God alone that can enlighten the mind, convince the conscience, teach, and change the heart. And it was likewise necessary, that he should be man, that he might converse with us, and convey his instructions to us, in such a familiar way, as we could receive. Such is the weakness of our present frame, that the majesty of God's appearance occasions a distressing panic, and, hence, when Israel had seen some glimpses of God's glory and majesty, at the giving of the INREDEMPTION. 83 law, they besought the Lord to speak no more to them, in such a manner, lest they died. And no doubt guilt increases our dread at the approach of God, and therefore renders us unfit to attend with due calmness to his immediate instructions. An instance of this we have in the prophet, who, when he heard the seraphs shout, " Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts, the heavens and earth are full of the majesty of his glory," lamented in this mournful language, " Woe is me, I am undone, for mine eyes have seen the King, the Lord of Hosts." In- finite purity, attended with awful majesty, so alarms our fears, as to render us unfit for instruction ; but the Son of God appearing in our natm-e to make atonement for trans- gressors, the brightness of his divine majesty being veiled with the mantle of his humanity is thereby allayed, and so more accommodated to our present state of weakness. Hereby we are encouraged to draw near to him, and to hear with composure his gentle instructions, which drop as the rain, and distil as the dew upon the tender herb. Nor was the union of the divine and human natures in the person of the Mediator less necessary, my brethren, in respect of his Priestly oflBce. He must be man, that the sinning nature might suffer, and thereby acquire a right to the satisfaction made ; for our title to the benefits of Christ's sufferings depends upon our union to him, which is not only spiritual by faith, but natural also ; for, as the apostle observes, " He who sanctifies, and they who are sanctified, are all one;" i. e., they have communion in the same nature. Inasmuch as sufiering, according to the 84 THEWISDOMOFGOD divine declaration, was necessary to atone for sin, of which the Deity is incapable, it behoved our High Priest to be man, that he might have a capacity for it ; and that those sufferings might be of sufficient dignity and value, and the human nature supported under them, it was as necessary he should be God. Nor was it less needful that the Mediator should par- take of both natures, in order to intercede for us as a Priest ; that so he might have a sufficient interest in his Father's affection to prevail in his suit for us, and, at the same time, be possessed of tender affections towards us. Being the Son of God, him the Father always hears, and being the Son of man, he is touched with the feeling of our infirmities ; we have, therefore, encouragement to come with boldness to the throne of his grace to obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need. And is it not also requisite that the Mediator should be God and man, in regard to his Kingly office ? For unless he be God, how can he apply the fruits of his death to us, dispossess the strong man armed, and subdue us to the obedience of faith ? And if he had not been man, how could he have led us into the way of universal holiness, by the influence of his own example, which is, doubtless, an excellent method to reform mankind ? It is not only necessary to enact rules of virtue by a kingly authority, but likewise, by example, to make precepts practicable and honourable. When brave generals, though of the noblest lineage, design to animate their armies to heroic achieve- ments, they voluntarily submit their persons to all the INREDEMPTION. 85 humble oflfices and hardships of a state of war, courageously lead their troops into the high places of the field of battle, and expose their lives to the greatest perils. This our Lord has done for us ; the Captain of our salvation, the King of the church, and Lord of the universe, has been made perfect through sufferings. Another instance of divine wisdom in the redemption of man, by the Lord Jesus Christ, is in making the remedy to have some analogy and proportion to the cause of our ruin ; i. e., as we fell in the first Adam, considered as our representative, so we are raised by the second, considered in the same character : " as by the disobedience of one, many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one, many are made righteous." As guilt and death came by the first, through imputation to all his natural offspring, that are united to him naturally by existence, so righteousness and life came by the second Adam, through imputation to all his spiritual offspring, that are united to him spiritually by faith. Moreover, my brethren, divine wisdom is conspicuous in the manner whereby our redemption is accomplished, viz : by the humiliation of the Son of God ; by this, Jehovah, as it were, counterworks the sin of angels and men. Pride is the malignity of every sin, for, by it, the sinner sets up his will against God. Now that our dear Re- deemer might cure the disease we labour under, in its original source, by the nature of the remedy, he applied to our arrogance, humility. Man, who is but a worm and crushed before the moth, was vainly and wickedly guilty 8 TXX VIS^SM tUT €«9 ifc aoit' siftihBi^ iv Ik < QBB 4M1J LIU- SBEHRE'S' SDEIO I y R E D E M P T I 0 y . 87 life should spring from death, honour from iomominT, healing from stripes, blessedness from a cui^e I This is so contrarv to the usual course of things, that to render it credible, it was tvpified by manv symbols, and foretold by many prophets before it came to pass, that, when it came, it might be esteemed an effect of Grod's eternal counsel, almighty power, and unsearchable wisdom. Though Christ crucified be to the Jews a stumbling-block, and to the Greeks foolishness, yet to those that are called, he is the power of God, and the wisdom of God. Surely great is the mystery of godliness, God manifest in the flesh ; whatever our modem exalters of carnal reason, and monopolizers of wisdom, mutter to the eontrazy not- withstanding. These men saT ther are Christians, and ret with a show of wisdom, and pretext of 6ien«lship to Jesus Christ, they presume to confront the express testimony of his inspired apostles : they labour with art and address to rob his religion of its grand peculiars, and to substitute polished paganism in its place, and would have us to believe the iest, the iucrd. the world by wisdom knew not God ; it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save those that believe ;" t. e., the great Sovereign and Lord of all. who has a right to do with his own as he pleasess has, of his mere motion, so ordered the matter, that bj the 88 T H E W I S D 0 M OF G 0 D Wmble preaching of the cross of Christ, or, in other words, the mediatorial plan of salvation, by the suflferings and death of the Son of God (which some stumble at, and reckon inconsistent and foolish), those that believe shall obtain eternal happiness. Such who reckon the grand peculiars of the religion of Jesus foolish and absurd, would act a more candid and consistent part, if they renounced the name of Christianity altogether, (for what signifies the name without the thing ?) and openly declared that they reject the Bible, as a sure and sufficient guide to heaven, and betake themselves to their Dagons, viz : their carnal reason, and graceless virtue, — to a dependence on the former as their supreme and sufficient guide in the matters of religion, and on the latter as their only Saviour. " My soul, come not into their secret ; to their assembly, mine honour, be not thou united." Let Jewish, Grecian, and British infidels or pagans, (the most inexcusable of all the rest, who in the midst of light and day grope in Egyptian darkness,) in the pride and stoutness of their hearts deride and burlesque the mysterious and humble doctrines of Christ crucified, as a nonsensical scheme ; yet they never will be able, by all their art, their eloquence, and sovereign contempt, to drive those that have experienced a gracious change (a divine birth) from the foundation of their hope. No, such have an inward witness, that " Christ crucified is the wisdom of God, and the power of God ;" and in every successive period, till time concludes its drama, there will be such, who shall not be ashamed of the gospel of Christ, but glory in his cross, as a badge of honour ; for " the IN REDEMPTION. 89 foundation of God stands sure." Jehovah has graciously promised, that the gates of hell shall not prevail against his church, and that no weapon formed against her shall prosper. But to proceed : The divine wisdom, my brethren, appears gloriously in forming the plan of the gospel, in such a manner, as at once to provide for the comfort of men's souls, and promote the purity of their manners. And this, indeed, is an inseparable character of divine doctrines, that they equally tend to promote God's glory and our benefit. Thus, as the way to blessedness by a mediator, eflfectually secures God's honour, so it powerfully incites the sinner's hope, love and joy, by representing the blessed God as amiable, benign, and gracious, by providing a complete satisfaction to injured justice, that thus a way might be opened for a liberal, consistent and honourable effusion of divine goodness, in all its innumerable instances, in all its various and valuable effects, adapted to every changing scene of life, adapted to every circumstance of the indi- gent and distressed ; and sufficient to support, relieve, yea, refresh and content them, in the midst of miseries and woes ; and under a train and complication of the greatest calamities, which this Bochim, this state of exile, affords. These primitive and faithful servants of Christ, the apostles, though they were by many reckoned deceivers, yet they were true ; though they had nothing, yet they possessed all things ; though they were sorrowful, yet they were always rejoicing. The mediatorial plan shows us how *' God may be just, and yet the justifier of him that 8* 90 T H E W I S D 0 M 0 F G 0 D believeth in Jesus," because of his propitiation. This opens to our view the unspeakable gift of the Son of God, and assures us of the gift of all things with him, in case we believe ; in particular, this fixes our final perseverance in goodness, a crowning mercy, upon the impregnable basis of the immutable purpose, the almighty power, and faith- ful promise of God ; upon the sacred suretyship, the com- plete satisfaction, and perpetual intercession of the Lord Jesus Christ ; and therefore this gospel scheme of grace and salvation opens an unfailing spring of joy, and lays a firm foundation for our hope and trust ; this calms the guilty, restless mind, and makes it "rejoice in the hope of the glory of God, with joy unspeakable, and full of glory." And as the gospel of Christ provides for our solace, so it incites to universal purity. Do not the sufferings of the Son of God for sin give us a dreadful representation of its malignity and danger, seeing nothing less could make a satisfaction for it, and, therefore, serve to deter us from it? We may judge of the danger of a disease by the difficulty of its cure ; nothing less could heal our mortal malady than the blood of God; and seeing Christ has expressed such amazing love to us, does not this tend to beget love in us to him, and to constrain us to a voluntary, sincere and uniform obedience, from that truly noble principle ? Now, if the gospel of Christ be such as has been described, with what ardour should we celebrate the divine praises for this revelation, so worthy of God, so suited to the case of fallen man ? The apostasy of our first parents was so INREDEMPTION. 91 fatal to US, that nothing less than infinite wisdom could find out a sufficient remedy. There is no discovery of this in the works of creation. The heavens and the earth do, indeed, prove the existence of a Supreme Being, by pointing to some of his adorable attributes ; but cannot represent the design of redemption, which has no connection with the existence of creatures, but hangs altogether upon the sovereign pleasure of God. The doctrine of the Trinity, which is the foundation of the mediatorial plan of salva- tion, cannot be known by the frame of the universe. Nor can natural reason, by its utmost force, attain to the knowledge of redeeming grace and love. It is true, there are some remains of the law of nature in the heart of man, some common notices (rudera, vestigia) of the differences between moral good and evil, otherwise the world would soon disband and turn into the wildest anarchy, the rudest chaos, and become an Aceldama. Though misery when felt, excites to look out for a remedy, yet, here reason is at a loss, at a plunge, and quite non-plussed. How could the Israelites imagine, that by looking to the brazen serpent, those that were stung should be healed ? And how can a poor creature discover, by the mere dint of his own genius, or light within, the satisfaction of divine justice by Jesus Christ? No, they cannot, and hence it is called a "mystery, hid from ages and genera- tions;" nay, though the human mind had never been cor- rupted, it could not, by the force of its reasonings, find it out ; for this the very angels could not discover, till it was made known to them by the church. By the first coming 92 THEWISDOMOFGOD of Christ, and the conversion of many to him, the depths of divine wisdom were unveiled. The apostle informs us, that the case of the Gentiles was extremely dangerous : "their understandings were dark- ened, being alienated from the life of God, through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their hearts." The apostle Paul declares, that the Ephesians were formerly darkness, i. e. while pagans ; and elsewhere assures us that " the natural man does not understand the things of the Spirit of God ;" that they are foolishness to him, and he cannot know them, because they are spiritu- ally discerned ; and this was not only the case with the ruder sort, but of the more polite and learned ; for, as has been before observed, "the world by wisdom knew not God." Natural reason cannot inform us whether God will pardon any transgressors at all, or not, or upon what terms. It is true, the modern Deists do now trump up a plausible scheme of natural religion, with design to overset revealed, but are not so candid as to inform us that they borrowed their lessons from the Bible ; without the assistance of which, notwithstanding their pride and pretence to penetration (or superior acumen), they would speak as darkly, doubting- ly, and confusedly, as their more ingenious and ingenuous forefathers, the pagan philosophers, long since. What a horrid confusion of sentiments, what a rude, wild, and dark chaos, overwhelmed the pagan world before Christ's coming, in respect of the most important points of religion ! Varro declares, that there were, among them, no less than three hundred different opinions about the INREDEMPTION. 93 chief good ; nor did they inculcate internal purity, and the necessity of forgiving injuries ; and the best of them offered but uncertain conjectures about the immortality of the soul. A view of their miseries may justly heighten our value for the mercies we enjoy. While many nations dwell in darkness, and in the shadow of death, the day-spring from on high has visited us, and the Sun of righteousness arisen with healing under his wings upon us. This dis- tinguishing, important, and unmerited benefit should fire our souls with love and gratitude, and stir us up to the most afi"ectionate thanksgiving. It is the prerogative of God to reveal the secrets of his kingdom to whom he pleases ; how, then, can we reflect upon the divine good- ness towards us, without the warmest emotion, the most admiring, grateful sentiments ? Surely, by nature we are as blind, corrupt, and perverse as any other nation ; what are we, then, that God should be so gracious to us ? If the publication of the law to the people of Israel was justly reckoned their peculiar treasure, what, then, is the revelation of the gospel by the Son of God, which alone discovers our remedy, and of which there is no innate notice in human natui-e, nor any given otherwise univer- sally. Can this principle be easily justified, that there is some- thing in mankind, which, if attended to, is sufficient to direct man to salvation without the Scriptures ? It is no matter what this something be called, whether reason, conscience, or the light within, seeing the substance inten- ded is the same. Do not the Scriptures positively declare 94 THEWISDOMOFGOD that there Is no name given under heaven, by which sal- vation can be obtained, but the name of Jesus ; that faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God ; that we cannot hear without a preacher ; that the heathen are darkness, without the covenants of promise, without God; that they perish for lack of vision, and that all the unre- generate before conviction are blind, dead, possessed with Satan ; that the light in some is darkness, and that all men have not faith ? Now, how can the aforesaid principles agree with those declarations ? And do not millions of facts (which are stubborn things) in the pagan world, in the present and past ages, and in various nations, confirm the aforesaid testimony of Scrip- ture, that the pagans, whatever pains they take in their different ways of religion (unless they obtain some information from the sacred Scriptures), remain ignorant of the way of salvation by Christ ? If the pagans had this knowledge, is it reasonable to think that they would be brought to the profession of what they believe with great difficulty, in places where this profession is* not attended with any danger ? And yet this has often been the case, and is so still ; and why have so many opposed, with great vehemence, and without any sense of guilt, the profession of Christianity, (with Saul before his conversion,) if it be 60 universally known as is supposed ? And why do none, among such vast multitudes, and during so many ages, give any account of this matter ? Further, is not one design of the sacred scriptures for *' doctrine and instruction," " to make the man of God INREDEMPTION. 95 perfect and thoroughly furnished to every good work ;" now what need is there of this, if there be sufficient light in every man to direct him without it ? Is it not absurd to say, we need more than what is sufficient, or that we need more than we need ? Is not the Bible, therefore, needless and superfluous, according to this principle ? And is this principle safe, that, in its consequences, deprives us of our Bible ? Pray is not the business of pastors after God's heart, to feed the people with knowledge and understand- ing ? And is it not the design of their office to turn sin- ners from darkness to light ? But what need is there of this institution at all, what need of any labours to instruct mankind, if men have sufficient light without it in them- selves ? Is not preaching at any time or place, on this plan, an absurdity, a mere farce? And why did the apostles take so much pains in travelling and preaching ? Why did they run such risks and endure such hardships ? Was it to do a superfluous business, to teach people what they knew already, or might know without their assistance ? If so, was this prudent in them (seeing they carried on no business of merchandize, or traffic in their travels to enrich themselves), or a good argument that they had the full exercise of their reason ? Pray did they sufier stripes, imprisonment, or death, like wise men or fools, for doing what was needless ? Judge ye. Upon this hypothesis, is it probable that we shall be duly sensible of the value of our religious privileges, sincerely thankful for them, tenderly concerned for those that want them, and use diligence to proselyte them to Christianity, when we judge that they are unnecessary ? 96 THEWISDOMOFGOD But to proceed, is not the incomprehensible mystery of redeeming wisdom and grace, well worthy of our serious thoughts and study ; seeing it excels all other sciences in the sublimity of its object, the certainty of its principle, the efficacy of its influence, and the value of its end ? It is a doctrine that affects the soul with the highest admiration of the divine wisdom, love, and grace, and makes us speak in the Psalmist's language, " How wonder- ful are thy thoughts to us-ward !" When the Almighty hereby tui-ns our captivity, we are as those that dream. This opens before us the grandest theme, that was ever exposed to mortal eye or ear ; a complication of wonders, the chief of all the ways of God ; strange that He who fills heaven and earth, should be confined in a virgin's womb — that life should die and, being dead, revive — that mercy should triumph, without infringing on the rights of justice ! The principle of this mysterious doctrine is immutable, like God, the author and object of it ; whereas, philoso- phical sciences are frequently shifting ; almost every one, through pride and excessive self-love, is disposed to despise and pull down what another, with much labour, builds up. And how precious and powerful is the influence of this doctrine upon those that believingly receive it ! While they behold, as in a glass, the glory of the Lord, they are transformed into the same image from glory to glory — this is eternal life, to know God, and Jesus Christ whom he has sent. 0 ! let us cry earnestly to God, that Christ crucified may be more and more the wisdom of God, and the power of God to us ! Amen, amen. Dear Lord Jesus Christ, say Amen. SAMUEL BLAIR. The Ret. Samuel Blair was a native of Ireland, but came early to this country, and received his education in the Log College, under Mr. William Tennent, Sen. He must have been among the first pupils of this institution. After finishing his classical and theolo- gical studies, Mr. Blair put himself under the care of the New Castle Presbytery, by which body he was in due time licensed to preach the gospel. Soon after his licensure, he was settled in the Presby- terian Congregation at Shrevesbury, in New Jersey, in 1734. He laboured in this field for five or six years, when he received an earnest call to settle in New Londonderry, otherwise called Faggs Manor, in the State of Pennsylvania. Here he instituted a classical school, similar in its purpose to that of Mr. Tennent, in Nesha- miny, in which some of the ablest ministers of the Presbyterian Church received either the whole, or the more substantial parts of their education. There are no records extant, from which we can learn any par- ticulars respecting the fruits of Mr. Blair's labours, at Shrewsbury. Here he commenced his ministerial work; and, as he was a faithful, able and zealous preacher of the truth as it is in Jesus, we entertain no doubt that some of the good seed which he sowed, fell into good ground, and brought forth fruit. Under his ministry at New Londonderry, there occurred a very remarkable revival of religion, of which he wrote a particular nar- rative. The congregation at Faggs Manor consisted almost entirely of emigrants from the north of Ireland ; and had been formed a num- 9 (97) 98 SAMUEL BLAIR. ber of years, but had never enjoyed the ministry of a stated pastor. His settlement among them took place in November, 1739; although he was not installed as their pastor until the month of April, 1740. Mr. Blair vras one of the most learned and profound, as well as pious, excellent, and venerable men of his day. His deep and clear views as a theologian, are sufficiently evident from his treatise on "Predestination," where this awful and mysterious doctrine is treated with the hand of a master. As a preacher, Mr. Blair was very eminent. There was a solemnity in his very appearance, which struck his hearers with awe, before he opened his mouth. And his manner of preaching, while it was truly evangelical and instructive, was exceedingly impressive — he spoke as in the view of eternity, as in the immediate presence of God. He contracted the disease of which he died, by exposure in attending upon a meeting of the Trustees of the College of New Jersey. His last words, a minute or two before his departure, were, "The Bridegroom is come, and we shall now have all thingg." And thus, under a gleam of heaven, he breathed out his last. Though his life was protracted beyond the age attained by Davies and Brainerd, yet he may be said to have died young; for, from the in- scription on his tomb, it appears that he was only thirty-nine years and twenty one days old, when he was taken away. TKEATISE ON THE DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. BY THE REV. SAMUEL BLAIK. In order to speak clearly and to advantage upon any subject, and especially, if it be much controverted in the world, it is, in the first place, necessary that it be exactly defined and bounded by its proper limits ; that it be repre- sented properly, as it is maintained by those who contend for it, that so both parties may have the same fixed, deter- minate idea of what they reason about, and speak both still to the self same thing. Endless are the confusions and contentions that are introduced into the world, either for the want of this care in defining and rightly under- standing the subject in debate, or for want of honesty in an opponent, when he will not keep close to the very thing, though he doth understand what it is. It is the readiest O way to bring out controversy to a right issue, rightly to state and represent the case, and then to keep close to it, as so stated, and not sufier another thing, under the same name, to be shufiled in in its place, through the course of the argument. In this way, such objections, as suppose the case to be different from what it is, are easily answered (99) 100 TREATISE ON THE by reducing the objector to the prefixed limits, and so showing his argument to be nothing to the purpose in hand. And I think there is nowhere more need of this care and attention, than about the doctrine of God's Decrees or Predestination, which is the subject of this small treatise. I know not any doctrine more furiously opposed, without being rightly understood, or by being disingenuously and uncandidly misrepresented. I shall, therefore, first of all, state the doctrine truly, and then defend and confirm it. I. As to the true state of the doctrine, it may be taken up in these two or three propositions : 1. That as God, from everlasting, was pleased in his own free sovereignty to decree and to determine to create this world, and to make man in it, a reasonable creature, in his own image, holy and upright, every way fitted and impowered for that duty which was due from such a rational creature to the great God Creator, with full ability to pre- serve and continue in that happy state of integrity ; and to enter into a covenant of life with him, wherein all the human race were to be concerned and engaged ; and, Adam, their first father, constituted their public head and repre- sentative ; so that, as he kept or broke the covenant, they were to enjoy or lose the promised blessings of it ; and as God infallibly foreknew the fall and transgression of Adam, as what he had decreed to permit, and so the de- pravity and ruin of his posterity consequent thereupon, according to the covenant, with all the actual sins which every individual should ever be guilty of; so he was like- wise pleased, of his own mere grace and free favour, to de- DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 101 cree and determine to recover and save a number, only known to himself, of tliat fallen, wretched race, through the mediation of his own Son's redeeming them, bj answering the precept and penalty of the broken law for them ; and through the sanctification of his eternal Spirit making them fit for, and capable of, glorifying and enjoy- ing him for ever. 2. That God's determining and appointing to save any of fallen mankind, or any in particular more than others, was not upon the foresight of any difference which he fore- saw they would make among themselves, by the better improvement of any common helps and advantages, as the reason of it ; but it was purely of his own sovereign, free, wise pleasure, and distinguishing grace. 3. The rest of fallen mankind, not thus chosen and or- dained to eternal life, he was pleased of his sovereign, wise and righteous pleasure, as a just king and lawgiver, to determine to leave in their fallen state, and punish them according to all the sin and disobedience which they should be guilty of, and chargeable with. This is, briefly, a just view of the case I am upon ; which, I hope, with the divine direction and conduct, to maintain against all the arguments commonly opposed to the doctrine. I cannot, indeed, expect that this repre- sentation of it will render it generally acceptable and agreeable to those who have been long prejudiced against it ; but that is not the question, whether we would incline or desire to have it so ; but, whether it be truly and really 80, whether we would desire to have it so, or not. Many 9* 102 TREATISE ON THE of the laws and commands of God are very contrary to the will and inclination of depraved sinners ; but they are not the less truly the commands of God for that. In the defence of this doctrine, I would first show, that it is a reasonable, and next, that it is a scriptural doctrine ; and speak to the arguments which may be urged both for and against it, from both these topics, of reason and revelation. II. Those who oppose the doctrine of absolute decrees, generally bring in a heavy indictment against it, as big with the most glaring absurdities, inconsistencies, and contradictions to the very light of reason ; and these, such as involve in them the grossest impiety, and most horrid blasphemy against the Divine Majesty : as, that it is directly contrary to, and necessarily infers the exact reverse of most of, the glorious perfections and attributes which reason as well as scripture teaches us to ascribe to the great God ; that it makes him unjust, and tyrannically cruel ; some say, I dread to express it, worse than the very devil; that it makes him the author of sin, chargeable with most, if not all the guilt of it ; that it makes him a most gross, hypocritical dissembler, &c. But, sure, it is not the proper Calvinistic doctrine upon that head, that these men bring in all these awful and shocking charges against ; but some horrid composition of their own brain, which they will palm upon the Calvinists, whether they will or no : or else, they just resolve to bring a popular odium upon the doctrine, by such vile, bold, and daring methods ; to impose upon such as are not well capable to reason clearly or closely upon such a sublime subject, that DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 103 they may abhor the very thoughts of it. I readily own, that whatsoever notion infers any the least imperfection in God, is unreasonable, and worse than false. But let the account I have given of this doctrine, be but duly and unbiassedly considered ; and then tell me, if there is any thing so dishonourable to God, or unreasonable in it ; if there is, in which of the three propositions, or articles, is it ? Is it in the first, when it is said, that God decreed to permit Adam's fall ? But you must own that he did per- mit it : that is, that he did not prevent it, if you own that Adam did fall ; and consequently, you must own that God decreed to permit or sufier him to fall ; for it is highly absurd to say, that he did permit it without determining to permit it ; that is the same thing as to say that he took no notice of it at all, till it was done ; that it never once came under the view of his all-comprehending, all-discern- inof mind, how Adam would behave himself in such circumstances as he was in, when he did transgress, if left merely to his own use of his original powers ; but this is to deny God's infinite and boundless perfection. Well then, if he had this view and knowledge of what Adam would do in such a case, if thus left to himself, that is, that he would sin ; he determined either to hinder or suffer it, to prevent or permit it. It is manifest that he did not determine to prevent it, for if so, it would not have been ; and his not determining or decreeing to prevent it, when he infallibly knew it would be if he did not, was decreeing to permit it. And then, upon this decree to permit the fall, proceeded God's certain foreknowledge of it, as future. 104 TREATISE ON THE Moreover, this permissive decree and foreknowledge of man's transgression and apostasy, plainly appear from God's having foreordained a Redeemer before the founda- tion of the world, as according to 1 Pet. i. 18 — 20. And now, seeing these things are plainly so, viz : that God did thus determine to permit the fall of man, which, in his perfect and boundless knowledge, he saw would be, if he did not hinder it by his immediate, super-added influence ; and consequently foresaw it, as a thing that would surely be ; so plain, that he must have a strange art of managing his reason, who will carefully follow these few steps I have here taken, and not be constrained to yield his assent ; then, surely, one would think there was more reverence and honour due to the great and glorious majesty of God, than for any poor worms of the dust to bring in their bold charges against him here, and say, that for these things he is the author of sin : either in that he created man at all, or in that he did not prevent his sin, when he could have done it. Who art thou, 0 man, that repliest against God ? Surely, it becomes us to entertain more honourable, exalt- ing thoughts of God, than to give the least way to such a vile suggestion ; even supposing our poor mole-eyes should not be able to discern, to our satisfaction, how it could be otherwise. We may, on the one hand, be clearly assured of God's permissive decree, and certain foreknowledge of man's sin ; and, on the other hand, as well assured, that he is essentially and infinitely holy ; and though we should not be able to reconcile these together, yet he can ; and that ought to silence and satisfy us. It does not well DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 105 befit US to put ourselves on a par with him ; and think that he can know nothing but what we must know too. But yet, I see no need of leaving the case at this issue neither ; for how unreasonable and ridiculous is this ground of the charge ! God did not propose and determine to prevent Adam's sinning, when it was easy to his power to have prevented it ; well, and what then ? Did not the Lord give him sufficient power to have prevented it himself? And was not this enough to free the kind Creator from all blame in the case? Cannot God make a creature perfect, and complete in its order and rank, endowed with full ability and power to preserve its glory unstained, and put it in a state of probation and trial, without a criminal charge ? Must he be called to answer at the creature's bar, for his own miscarriage, and voluntary rebellion, in such a case ? Indeed, if we maintained that God did not give Adam sufficient power to preserve his fidelity, and withstand the temptation ; or that God, by his immediate energy, overpowered him to a compliance ; then, I confess, there would be no standing before the argument. But, as we assert no such thing, nor anything that will afford such a consequence, how unfair and inexcusable is it, to give out as if we did ! which is the method of too many, either ignorantly or wilfully. And let me observe, that the Arminians, yea, men of all sorts of religions in the world, are no less obliged to answer this difficulty, than the Calvinists ; for they must all acknowledge that there is sin in the world, and that God has permitted it, otherwise it could not be ; yea, you must acknowledge yourselves to 106 TREATISE ON THE have been guilty of sins, and such as you might have avoided. But dare you lift up your face to God, and say to him, " I have done many evils, even such as I had power to refrain ; but they are thy sins, and not mine, because thou didst not keep me from them?" Would not your own reason confound you with shame, at the thoughts of such a malapert, senseless speech to God ? As little reason is there, whatever less, for charging the righteous God in the case of Adam's transgression. Or, is it matter of just prejudice against this doctrine, that mankind are said to have been considered, in the di- vine decree, as universally fallen in Adam, in consequence of his breach and violation of the covenant of God, wherein he was appointed the covenant-head and representative of his posterity ? But, sure, yourselves must acknowledge that all mankind did fall in Adam's transgression, if you profess to believe the holy Scriptures. So long as the fifth chapter of St. Paul's epistle to the Romans stands in the Bible, it will be impossible, with any face of modesty, to deny it ; where we are told, that " by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin ; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned ;" and, that " by the oflFence of one judgment came upon all men to condemna- tion." When you say that all mankind are recovered again out of the condemnation and ruin which the sin of Adam brought upon them, by Jesus Christ, is it not an acknowl- edgment that they were at once fallen, and ruined by it? And inasmuch as yourselves acknowledge it was so, you must acknowledge it was reasonable and no way incon- DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 107 sistent with the perfections of God that it should be so ; or else you saj, point blank, that God was, at least once, unrighteous. And now, seeing mankind were fallen in Adam, which God's glorious perfections will not suffer us to think was any way unreasonable or unjust in him, it necessarily follows, that it would have been no way unrea- sonable or unjust in God, if he had so pleased, to have left them all in that fallen state, without restoring: anv. Seeing there was once a plain forfeiture of all rights and privileges, according to law and justice, it was at the free pleasure of the great Lawgiver to bestow them again upon any or not; unless you will say that our recovery by Christ was not of free and mere grace, but what God was bound to order and bring about, or else oppose his own nature, and be unjust ; and so, that herein he did what we have no reason to thank him for : which to say, is not only a gross inconsistency in itself, but such an impiety against God, that few, I believe, would be so bold as to venture upon it. It is ridiculous to talk of our being re- deemed by God out of a miserable state, which it was un- just for him either to suifer us to come into, or yet to leave us in. There is no need of a mediator and redeemer in such a case. Then, indeed, Christ is dead in vain ! Thus far we have made our way clear. Well then, I say again, if it would have been no way unbecoming God, if he had so pleased, to have determined to leave all mankind in that fallen state; no man will say, who duly considers what he says, that it would have been any way unbecoming him, had he so pleased, looking upon them in this fallen, 108 TREATISE ON THE guilty, apostate state, to have made this distinction among them, in his eternal purpose, which I am defending. And so the proper doctrine of predestination, in the right notion of it, must be owned to be entirely reasonable ; and the very method, for what we know, that God (imless he has told us to the contrary) was pleased to take. But, to make all this yet clearer, I would give this far- ther brief account of the reasonableness of mankind's par- taking in the sad fruits of Adam's transgression. I would account for it, from his being set up as their public head and representative in the first covenant. If this constitu- tion and appointment of God was reasonable, then all that was natively consequent upon it, according to the tenor of it, must be so too. To make it appear that this consti- tution was every way just and reasonable, let it be con- sidered, that it was in its own nature adapted and directly calculated to the great good and advantage of mankind, securina; to them a confirmed state of innocence and ever- lasting happiness, upon their first father's continuing obedient, so long as God saw fit to leave him in a state of probation and trial ; so that none of them would have been any more in the danger of a probationary state for them- selves. Adam was sufficiently impowered to manage this great trust, endowed with full ability to keep the covenant ; yea, with as full as any of his offspring would have had, had they been to pass a time of trial for themselves ; and his motives to care and watchfulness were as strong as theirs could have been, having his own eternal interest as much engaged in the case as theirs ; so that their whole DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 109 stock, all their everlasting concerns, were every whit as safe in his hands, as they would have been in their ovm. And, seeing their case was, this way, as safe as if it had been in their own management, and there was a rational prospect of a glorious, unspeakable advantage by it, though there was an awful evil on the other hand, in case of diso- bedience; yet, since the rational hope on the one hand, was far greater than the danger on the other, it was surely a reasonable, wise and good plan, and which, I am satis- fied, we would all have admired and praised the glorious God for, had our representative fulfilled his part of the covenant, and we now been enjoying the happy conse- quences of it. If so, then, how unreasonable and wicked must it be now to quarrel with the scheme and its glorious Author on the account of it, because it has eventually proved, through our trustee's default, to our disadvantage ? If it would have been just and altogether right had he obeyed, does his sin and disobedience make it wrong and unjust? One thing more may be observed here, to free the subject of all misapprehension, viz: that it is not imagined that the same degree of punishment is justly due to Adam's posterity, merely on account of his trans- gression, which was due to himself for it. Thus far only is certain in this matter, that beside our being exposed by it to the various miseries of this life, and death itself, we lost all right and title to the life and happiness which God promised in the covenant, and the glorious moral image of God in our souls, viz : our original righteousness ; so that, instead of being now naturally holy and upright, we 10 110 TREATISE ON THE are naturally depraved and sinful ; which is the awful foundation and spring of our numberless actual trans- gressions, whereby we deserve an awfully aggravated con- demnation. I say, persons, for their actual sins, though they flow from their original corruption as the spring and foun- tain of them, deserve an awfully aggravated condemnation, or unspeakably greater than the law denounces only on the account of Adam's transgression ; inasmuch as that man or woman cannot be found, of whom it could justly be said, that they had never been farther guilty of actual sin, than what was absolutely unavoidable from the original deprav- ity of their nature. These things may suffice to evince the reasonableness of the doctrine of all mankind's being fallen in Adam ; and of their being considered as such, in the decree and purpose of God concerning their eternal states ; which, as has been already shown, proves the reasonable- ness of the doctrine of predestination ; forasmuch as God might justly have determined, either to save none, or to save all, or to save only a part, as he pleased. But farther, if any should yet be unwilling to yield the reasonableness of mankind's being so disinherited of all their spiritual and eternal^ privileges ; and their being liable to such a state of misery, by Adam's sin and disobedience; whatever temporal calamities they might in justice and reason be exposed to by it ; I would prove the reasonableness of the doctrine I am chiefly insisting upon, from principles which they must unavoidably grant, if they are not lost to all the common sense of mankind. You must own, that all mankind, except infac.ts, have DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. Ill actually sinned, wlietlier you own it to be the effect of Adam's sinning or not. "All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God." That it is so, in fact, is too notorious to be denied. Yea, you must own that mankind are naturally inclined to sin, and have a strong bias and propension that way. These things you must confess, account for them how you will ; and I am apt to think, the scripture account, resolving the universal depravity and sinful propensions of the human nature, into the trans- gression of our first parent, as the cause, will answer full as well as any you can give. It will be as satisfactory as either Plato's pre-existent state in the stars, or the eternal evil principle of the Manichees; or yet the imitation and example of Pelagius. However, that man- kind are so universally guilty of sin, let it come how it will, is but too manifest. Moreover, you must grant that they justly deserve punishment for their sin, from the sovereign Lawgiver of the rational world ; to say otherwise, is to say that sin is not sin ; sin must be as good as obedience and duty, if the sinner deserves no worse for it ; which is an absurdity a little too big to swallow, that takes away all dis- tinction between moral good and evil, and destroys all the notions of justice in the world. You must also grant, that God, from all eternity, certainly foresaw all the sins of all men, unless you have a God like yourself, who knows now, what he did not know before, by information from others. Now lay these things together, and then see, if it does not follow, by an unavoidable, logical necessity, that God might justly have decreed, and purposed from everlasting, to pun- 112 TREATISE ON THE isli tlie sinful, disobedient children of men, and not to save any of them out of their guilty state. For if God from ever- lasting foresaw that they would deserve to be thus cast off and punished, then he might justly determine to deal so by them ; unless you will say, it was unjust for him to determine to do what was just to do. And is the justness of his determining to punish a part of them only, according to the rules of governing justice, less conceivable, while he determines to save the rest in a way agreeable to the glory of his majesty and government, through the media- tion and redemption of his eternal Son ? Thus you may see, the denying of original sin does not overthrow the doctrine of predestination ; all that is gained by it, is a certainty that all such as die in their infancy, were elected to eternal life ; but then, they were not chosen in Christ, a Redeemer, nor are they brought to happiness through his redemption ; which is a notion that does not chime very well with the scriptures, which everywhere represent the atonement of Christ, as the only way of eternal happiness, to any of the human progeny ; which, I think, is a farther evident proof of original sin. And thus, I think, I have sufficiently cleared the first proposition. 2. In the next place, is there anything so horrid in the second article, viz : that God's decree and purpose, to save any of the fallen, apostate race, was not founded upon his foresight of their good works, and diligent endeavours, as the cause of it ; but was purely owing to his own sovereign pleasure and grace ? This is a sentiment so far from being unreasonable, that I think the contrary is plainly so, DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 113 absolutely considered, viz : that the imperfect, corrupted, and altogether selfish endeavours of rebellious, guilty- creatures, should be of such high price with God, as necessarily to determine him to save them ; so that he would be unjust, if he did not thereupon design and eifectuate their salvation. Is this a notion, either so very reasonable in itself, or honourable to God ? And yet this is the principle that must be maintained, if the doctrine I am defending, be charged with being in itself unreasonable. To manifest a little the unreasonableness of such a notion, I would ask, if an entire and perfect obedience to the law of God, without the least defect, would be any more than our duty to him, as he is such a glorious Being, and we his creatures ? If it would not, and no man in his right wits will say otherwise, then how can the very imperfect, the every way corrupt, and contempti- ble obedience, that is performed by guilty sinners, make it so necessary for God to pardon their past disobedience, as that he would be unreasonable and unjust, if he did not ? According to this principle, pardon would not properly be pardon ; it would not be an act of mere grace, and of rich mercy, but of just debt. But who is there, that has the front to demand it, as such, for all the good works that ever he did ? I believe you would find hard work of it to bring the notion into practice, and very formally tell the great God, that " though you had sinned against him, and contemned his authority ; yet you had done so well since, that you would not now be beholden to him for pardon, you claimed it as your due, on the score of his essential 10* 114 TREATISE ON THE equity, wlilch, he would be unjust, if he refused." It is, moreover, a notion that entirely supersedes and takes away all necessity of Christ's atonement and satisfaction. What need of such a propitiation and ransom, if anything that guilty sinners could do, could render it unjust in God, not to save them ? And now, seeing these things are plainly so, it as plainly and necessarily follows, that it was no way unreasonable, nor imbecoming any of the divine perfections, for God to make his own sovereign, absolute good-will and pleasure, the rule of his determinations, of dispensing his saving mercies to any fallen, guilty sinners ; and not their works or endeavours. Yea, I will add, it is highly presumable from reason itself, and seems to be its very dictates, that this was actually the way of God's proceeding in the case ; as what was most suitable to his independent sovereignty, for the maintaining, and illustra- tion of his exalted glory ; and to abase the pride of all flesh, that none should glory in his presence ; but, as it is written, "he that glorieth, should glory in the Lord alone:" that his redeemed and saved people should for ever ascribe the whole glory and praise to his sovereign, free, distin- guishing grace. This method, in the case, was proceeding like a God ; as becomes the Supreme Jehovah ; exalts both his own glory, and the happiness of saved sinners, to the highest ; while they are ever sensible, that as he might justly have saved none, so they have nothing to ascribe to themselves in the matter, why he saved them more than any others. Hence their hearts beat high with the tenderest, sweetest resentments of love and wonder, with DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 115 the highest ascriptions of glory and praise, to him that sits upon the throne, and to the Lamb, for ever and ever. So that, I believe, this doctrine suits best with the language of heaven, however it be relished on earth. If •we consider the hateful, horrid, and criminal nature of sin, what can there be in any sinner to engage to him the love and favour of a God of infinite holiness and incomprehen- sible majesty ; in whose sight the heavens are not clean ; who "charges his angels with folly?" Now, though all these considerations make it plainly appear, that it is every way reasonable, yea, most becoming the adorable majesty of God, that the reason of his appointing any fallen sinners, in particular, more than others, to eternal life, should be wholly resolved into his sovereign pleasure ; that it should be entirely founded in himself, and not at all in them ; yet I am apprehensive that here lies the main ground of the quarrel, for though sin had made man extremely poor, it has not made him humble, but much to the contrary. The unbroken pride and haughtiness of sin- ners' hearts will not allow it to be right or equitable at all, that it should be altogether at the free, sovereign pleasure of God, whether to save them or not. Unless they have it in their own hands, they will quarrel with God himself, although they deserve not so much as the least ground for hope that ever he will save them. It would " surely better become such hell-deserving rebels as we, to be so humbly sensible of our vile iniquities, as to acknow- ledge God's sovereign right to dispose of us as he sees fit ; that if he should abandon us to misery for ever, it 116 TREATISE ON THE would be but just and right, notwithstanding all that ever we could do ; and if he saves us, it will be an instance of the most glorious, free, sovereign grace and mercy, which he might righteously have denied. But these things may suflBce, here, to show that this part of the doctrine also stands free of all unreasonable absurdity, and unbecominfr reflections on God. And if you would have the whole evidence again in a narrow compass, you may take it thus : God, the great Creator and Upholder of all things, is the rightful Lawgiver and moral Governor of the reasonable world. Considering the infinite, boundless glory and per- fections of his nature, and his right in and over us, as his creatures, our obligations of love and duty to him are inconceivably great and infinite : hence sin and diso- bedience against such infinite majesty and obligations, is infinitely evil, deserving the sinner's everlasting rejection from God, with a superadded positive punishment. All mankind, through the sin and disobedience of their first parent, are become destitute of original righteousness, and all right to the life and happiness promised in the first covenant ; and all such as are preserved to years in the world, have sinned actually in their own persons, and that far beyond what was absolutely unavoidable from their original depravity ; whence they in justice deserve a far greater punishment, God had as clear and certain a knowledge of all this apostasy and sin of mankind, from all eternity, as after it actually came to pass ; so that in his decrees concerning them, he considered them as in such a fallen, guilty state, deserving the execution of his DOCTKINE OF PREDESTINATION. 117 vindictive justice ; and altogether insufficient to do any- thing that might in the least satisfy its demands, for the averting of the stroke. And so, from the whole, it clearly appears, that God had as absolute, just, and great a sovereignty over them, to appoint any part of them for life or death, according to his own pleasure, as the " potter has over his clay, of the same lump, to make one vessel to honour, and another to dishonour." And now, after all these things, what can reasonably be said against the third and last of the propositions, which is, that God determined to leave a part of these guilty sinners, (viz : those whom he did not choose to salvation,) in their fallen, guilty state, and to execute justice upon them for their sins? To say that this is unjust, &c., is to say that justice is injustice, &c. All that I shall farther observe here upon it, is, how injurious and unfair treat- ment it is, to give out, as too many who oppose the doc- trine do, as though we maintained that God doomed men to everlasting perdition, without any respect to, or con- sideration had of, their sin ! We say, that the reason why God chose some and rejected others, that is, these rather than those, was not because of the greater goodness of the one part, and greater sinfulness of the other, for all were "clay from the same lump," without any difference of this kind among them, amounting to such value, but " because it so seemed good in his sight." We assert, that none are doomed to everlasting perdition, but for their sin ; but then, it is not the reason of the difference that is made between them and those that are chosen to everlasting life. 118 TREATISE ON THE Now, though what has been already hitherto said, in explaining and vindicating the doctrine of predestination, might sufficiently furnish a careful, understanding reader with satisfactory answers to the objections that are usually supposed to be deduced from reason against it ; yet, for the more full satisfaction of all, I shall a little consider them particularly. One objection, that makes a mighty noise in the world, is, that it makes God the author of sin ; but it is as easy for me to deny this, as for the objector to assert it ; and asserting is all he can do, if he obliges himself to urge it against the doctrine, only as I have represented and ex- plained it in the preceding pages. Let such objectors show us what part of it is justly liable to such a charge, and how it contains or infers any such blasphemy. Does it make God the author of sin, to say, that he decreed to Buffer Adam to sin, when, in the meantime, we assert that he gave him sufficient power not to sin ; and only suffered him, without any compulsion, to abuse his liberty ? How ridiculous and senseless is such a charge for this ! Such objectors seem to think, or else to be willing to have it thought, that we maintain, that God either did not afford Adam sufficient ability to preserve, or that by his superior power he forced him to sin ; but let their slander die with them. Yet, I think, I have met with an author that pre- tends to prove this vile absurdity, consequent upon the score of bare permission. This, indeed, would be a rare art, could he make it do, to free the whole world of the blame of sin all at once ; for if God cannot so much as DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 119 permit sin, without being the author of it himself, then I think we are pretty clear, and all the devils too. He proves it by a simile : suppose a man to be standing on the top of a very high wall, holding a child over it by the arm ; well, he does not press it down or force it to fall, but only lets it go, and suffers it to fall (if it will, I suppose) ; and then the demand is, whether the man was not the author of that child's fall and death? I think it is no great difficulty to answer the question. I believe none would pretend to vindicate such a gross murder ; but then, I would demand if the cases were any way like one another ? If this simile is supposed to be parallel to the case it is brought to illustrate, then our opinion must be, that God at first so upheld Adam by the hand of his power, as that it was impossible for him to sin ; and then withdrew his hand from him, so as that it was impossible for him^ not to sin ; whereas we assert the direct contrary of both. Before the simile can be made in any tolerable degree similar to the case, many other things must be supposed in it ; par- ticularly, that the child is endowed with such a power as that it is as easy for it to stand in the air as to fall to the ground ; that the man has a rightful sovereignty and au- thority over it, to put it in such a situation, and make it its indispensable duty to stand where he has put it ; that it has a clear knowledge of its duty, and warning of its danger, and the like. These suppositions, I believe, will pretty much alter the case. Another objection brought against the doctrine is, that it makes God chargeable with the most unjust cruelty and 120 TREATISE ON THE sovereign tyranny ; but I have already sufficiently vindi- cated it from this awful charge ; unless it be unjust cruelty to decree justice, which is a contradiction in express terms. Was it not just in God to make man free, as well as per- fectly holy and upright — to appoint Adam the covenant head and representative of his offspring, as it has been explained — to permit him to act according to his original freedom and liberty — to permit all men to sin as they do, and to punish some of them, whom he pleases, for all the sin they are guilty of ? If these things are all right- eous and just enough, was it unjust in God to fore-appoint and determine them ? Would those, who oppose the doc- trine of predestination, but fairly represent it, and speak to it still as it is, they would surely be ashamed to offer such a charge as this against it : and of this themselves seem to be sensible; and, therefore, they commonly so manage the objection, as grossly to misrepresent the doc- trine, as though it contained in it that God, in his eternal purpose, doomed a number of mankind to destruction with- out any consideration at all had of their sin, whereby they would justly deserve it ; or that he purposed, by his irre- sistible power, to compel them to sin, that so he might damn them with some colour of justice ; whereas we dis- claim both the one and the other with the utmost abhor- rence. Again, it is objected that this doctrine makes God par- tial and a respecter of persons, which is justly reputed a very ill character in men, and, therefore, cannot, in the least, belong to God. This argument seems to be much DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 121 depended on among the more ignorant ; but those who make so much of it, ought to consider what that respecting of persons is, which is so criminal in men. It is their making such a difference between persons, in their temper and conduct towards them, as is contrary to right and equity, on account of some accidental things or circum- stances, wherein they may differ from one another: such as, nation, worldly dignity, relation, gifts, bribes, or the like ; and I really own, that partiality and respect of per- sons, in this sense, is very far from God. " He accepts not the persons of princes, nor regards the rich more than the poor." Job xxxiv. 19. He is not only far from doing injustice to any, but he makes no account at all of the little differences among them, of nation, worldly state and con- dition, or the like, as a reason of any of his dealings towards them ; and it is in this sense that respecting of persons is always taken in the Scripture, wherever it is condemned in men, or denied concerning God. And, sure, the doctrine I am defending is so far from inferring any such respect of persons in God, that it is, at the first view, directly contrary to it. Yet, farther, I would ob- serve, there may be among men a favouring of one more than another, which you may call respecting of persons, or if you will, partiality, or by what name you please ; but it carries no ill idea in it. Such, for instance, as our Lord speaks of (Matt, xx.), where the lord of the vineyard gave to some of his labourers an undeserved bounty, while he gave to others only what justice necessarily required. And this is brought in by our Lord Jesus himself, for this very 11 122 TREATISE ON THE case (see ver. 16.), to vindicate God's making sucli a difference among guilty sinners, against such as make this objection ; and God's defence here is unanswerable against all the murmurings of such as he has not chosen to salva- tion. Friend, I do thee no wrong, whatsoever good I do to others ; is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? Is thine eye evil, because I am good? It is farther objected, that, according to this doctrine, it is God's fault, and not theirs, that any perish ; inasmuch as it was ever impossible for them to be saved, seeing they were under an irreversible appointment to destruction, before ever they had a being. But what has been said already, will easily answer all the difficulty that may seem to be in this argument, viz : that God appointed them to be punished only for their sins, whereby they in justice deserve it. And, surely, their sinning is not any fault in God ; nor yet his appointing them to deserved punishment for it ; but seeing all their punishment will be only according to the demerit of their sin, their whole destruc- tion will properly be of themselves, and their own fault. But if any should yet foolishly think, that the mere neces- sity or infallible certainty of the event would render sinners free of all the blame of their destruction, because it was always certain, that so it would be in the end, let them try any other scheme they please, and see whether they can rid themselves of the difficulty ; for whatsoever at any time is, was always infallibly certain to be, whether you allow a decree concerning it or not ; so that you must DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 123 either deny that it is so much as possible for any creature to perish justly at all, or you must own that the bare cer- tainty of the event, that they will perish, does not free them from being the proper blamable causes of their own perdition ; and its being certain by a divine appointment, makes them no more clear of the blame, because the decree only is, to punish them for, and according to, the demerit of their sins ; which sins, it lays no forcible con- straint or compulsion upon them, to be guilty of. Again, it is said, " that if this doctrine be true, then it follows, that God creates men to damn them." This seems to be a ready-hand argument, almost in every one's mouth that denies the doctrine. Before we speak to any words or propositions, we ought to understand what is meant by them. Now all the meaning I can conceive in this sentence, [God creates men to damn them,] consistent with the propriety of speech, is, that their damnation is God's end in creating them ; the final cause and reason of his bringing them into being. And this imports in it that God loves and delights in the punishment and misery of creatures, merely as such, and for its own sake ; which is a thing most blasphemous to suppose of him. To suppose, that the misery of any creature, strictly and abstractly in itself, without any other consideration, is agreeable and pleasing to God ; yea, so agreeable, that he makes them for this very end that he may have the pleasure of punishing them ; is, indeed, to represent him like the very worst of beings. But then I would ask, Does God's decreeing to punish men for their 124 TREATISE ON THE sin, as they deserve, for maintaining the dignity of hia government, and the showing forth of his infinite holiness, justice, and rightful authority ; does this, I say, bear in it any such thing, as that he delights barely in the misery of creatures, so as to create them for the sake of it ? How irrational is such a consequence ! But if any will yet insist on it as a just consequence, I desire them to consider a little how they will free their own scheme of it ; which is every whit as liable to the charge. Unless they have stupid ignorance and blasphemous presumption enough to deny God's infinite understanding and fore- knowledge of all things, it is just as reasonable to bring this objection against the Arminians, as the Calvinists; and say, God creates men to damn them, if he knows beforehand that he will damn them ; if he foreknew that they would die impenitent, in unbelief; and thereupon has decreed their damnation before he has created them. The truth of the matter is this, God decreed to create all men for the manifestation of his own glory, which is his end in all his works ; and looking upon mankind in their apostasy and sin, he decreed to leave a particular part of them in that state, and to punish them according to their sin, for the manifestation of the glory of his sovereignty, holiness, and justice, and the right and infinite obligations of his authority, as a lawgiver over his reasonable creatures. This view of the case gives no ground for the charge contained in the objection. Though God foresees that mankind will sin against him, cannot he, notwithstanding, create them, and determine to punish them, or any part DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 125 of them, as their sin deserves, for the illustration of his glory aforesaid, without being chargeable with creating them just that he might damn them ? To say so, is the same thing as to say, that the sin and default of the creature must bind up God's hands from doing that which is in itself every way reasonable and right ; and, in short, to say that right is wrong. But I presume I have been long enough on the first method proposed for defending and confirming this doc- trine ; and that, from what has been said, it sufiiciently appears, at least, that it is a doctrine free from all unrea- sonable absurdity in itself, and no way dishonourable to God ; so that reason has nothing to say, why it may not be so. And if, in the next place, we find that God's infal- lible word of truth declares that it is so, this ought to put a final conclusion to the debate, and fully determine the controversy. If there is nothing in the doctrine absurd, or contrary to reason, why it may not be so ; then, when a passage of Scripture is brought to prove that it is so, we must not be put ofi" any more with this answer, that "what- ever the Scripture means, it cannot mean predestination," A great asserter of the Arminian doctrine, I think, as good as owns the reasonableness of the Calvinist doctrine. I mean Bishop Burnet, when he says, "It is one of the points wherein all agree, that God might have condemned every man to have perished for his own sins. " * If God might * Expos, xxxix. Art., page 167, Fol. This great man manages the debate with the greatest candour and temper of any I have met with of the Arminian side ; and yet even he is far from dealing so fairly as he ought, 11* 126 TREATISE ON THE have condemned all men to perdition for their sins, then, surely, much more a part of them only. But farther, reason not only readily allows, that God might have formed his eternal purposes and decrees, concerning fallen man, according to this doctrine ; but, if duly attended to, with- out selfish prejudice, it seems, as has been already hinted, powerfully to persuade us that so the case really is, as being most becoming God's independent sovereignty ; and most expressive of the absolute freeness, and glorious riches of his grace to those that are saved ; whereby the whole glory of it is secured to himself, and no ground afforded to the hell-deserving sinner for anything contrary to those humble acknowledgements of his own wretchedness, that well become him ; whereas the contrary doctrine leaves room to the sinner to trust to something in himself, and ascribe something to himself, in the matter of his salvation. It sets too high a value upon the despicable, religious endeavours of corrupted sinners, when it maintains, that God is thereby induced to receive the sinner to favour, notwithstanding all his rebellions ; and by thus repre- senting the God, whom by disobedience we have contemned and dishonoured, as so readily and surely reconciled to us on such terms, it depreciates his injured honours, and especially when he represents the maintainers of absolute predestination, as maintaining that the decree lays a compulsory force on the creature to sin. On this misrepresentation much of his arguing for the Ai-minians proceeds. He lays hold on the Supralapsarian Scheme for it, and, with- out suflScient evidence, pretends that the Sublapsarian scheme ultimately resolves and terminates in the same, as so represented. DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 127 takes off from the infinite malignity and due horror of sin. If sin against God is looked upon as a thing that is so easily compensated, and the breach occasioned by it, so readily made up on such low conditions : what mean, un- worthy conceptions are we likely to entertain of God's in- finite perfections and adorable attributes, when the contempt of them by sin is reckoned such a small matter ? But, 2. I proceed, with more express evidence and certainty, to prove and confirm the doctrine from the divine oracles, and infallible scriptures of truth. And here I shall first prove, that God has appointed and chosen some of fallen mankind to eternal life and salvation ; and that merely of his own sovereign grace and good pleasure, and not upon the foresight of any goodness of theirs, whereby they would distinguish themselves from others, as the reason of it. Next, I shall prove that the rest of mankind, not thus chosen to life, God has appointed to leave in their sins, and to punish them for them, according to their deserts : and then I shall answer such objections as are supposed to be in the scriptures against this doctrine, and give the true meaning of such scripture passages consistent with it. The first place of scripture I shall adduce for the proof of absolute election, is Acts xiii. 48, where, after an account of the opposition made to the apostles Paul and Barnabas, at Antioch, and the strong endeavours used by some, to prejudice the people against the doctrine which they preached, it is said, that " as many as were ordained to eternal life believed." The plain sense of these words 128 TREATISE ON THE is, that notwithstanding all the means used in that place, to hinder the people from believing the apostles' doctrine, yet a considerable number did believe ; because God had ordained them to eternal life, and so gave them faith to believe, in spite of all the arts of men used with them to the contrary ; and therefore it was impossible for the enemies of Christianity to keep them in unbelief. And this is perfectly agreeable to the sense of our blessed Lord, when he says, that " false Christs and false prophets should arise, showing such signs and wonders, that if it were possible, they would deceive the very elect;" (Matt. xxiv. 24 ;) clearly implying, that God had elected some to everlasting salvation, and the necessary means of it ; whom it is therefore utterly impossible for false teachers, with all their powers, finally to deceive and keep from believing in the true Redeemer. If any should say, that the reason why these were ordained to eternal life, and had grace given them to believe, was, because they were more righteously disposed, and better than the rest ; this is not only contrary to the scope of the place, and the mode of expressing the matter in the text, but we find in the next verse but one, that there were some of the most religious that believed not ; we are told that these opposers stirred up the devout (that is, the religious) and honourable women, as well as the chief men of the city, to persecute the apostles ; but they could not have the same influence upon those whom God had ordained to eternal life ; it was impossible for them to deceive the elect. Another very clear, and most express passage to our DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 129 purpose, is in Rom. xi. 5 — 7. "Even so then, at this present time also, there is a remnant, according to the election of grace. And if by grace, then it is no more of works ; otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace. What then ? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for ; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded." Here the apostle observes, that as in the time of the greatest defection of the people of Israel, in Elijah's days, God had reserved to himself a remnant of seven thousand; even so, at that present time, when the greater body of the Jewish nation had rejected Christ, there was also a remnant, according to the election of grace, that did believe. This believing remnant of the Jewish nation, were those who were elected and chosen out of it, to faith and salvation : and this election, whereby they were thus chosen, was an election of grace. Well, you will say, perhaps, you own all this, that God had elected a remnant of the Jews to faith in Christ, and salvation by him ; but then the reason of God's electing them was their good works ; whereby he foresaw they would render themselves more worthy of his choice than the rest. But don't you see, that the apostle expressly bars against such an imagination, when he says, "It is an election of grace ; and that if it be of grace, then it is no more of works ; or else grace is not grace ?" He tells you, that the election of works, which you contend for, is not the election of grace, which he asserts : if it be of works, it is no more grace. An election of works and grace both, is a down- 130 TREATISE ON THE right inconsistency, if we allow St. Paul to be the judge. "Israel has not obtained that which he seeketh for." There were many of Israel who were left to unbelief, that were seeking for righteousness and life as much as the others, that were, notwithstanding, sanctified by faith. Though they were thus equal among themselves, yet there was an election among them that obtained it, " when the rest were blinded," that is, left to their own blindness. I cannot see how the doctrine of absolute election can well be asserted in more strong, plain, and express terms, than the apostle uses for it in these verses. It cannot be said, that all he means by the " election of this remnant," was only God's purpose of affording them the privilege of the gospel, and outward means of grace ; for all the rest had the advantages afforded them, as well as they, according to the words of our Lord, " Many were called, but few {i. e. a remnant of them only) were chosen;" (Matt. xx. 16 ;) which manifestly shows, that they were elected to the saving benefit of those means, in consequence of which, they actually did obtain it : when the rest, who had the same advantage of these outward means, and were seeking for justification and life as well as they, did not obtain it ; but were left in their blindness and unbelief. To conclude this argument, the apostle here asserts an election of some, out of others, to eternal life ; and asserts it to be an election of grace, in such a full sense, as that it cannot be of works in any sense. So that you may see here a flat contradiction between the inspired apostle and the Arminians. They say, "Election is on the account of DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 131 VfOYKS foreseen ;" lie says, " It is not of works, but wholly of grace." They say, " It may be of works and grace both;" he says, "It cannot, without destroying the nature of both." For another proof, you may look as far back as Rom. viii. 28 — 30 : — " All things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose. For whom he did foreknow, he also did predesti- nate to be conformed to the image of his Son. Moreover, whom he did predestinate, them he also called ; and whom he called, them he also justified ; and whom he justified, them he also glorified." Those whom the apostle terms "the called, according to God's purpose," he tells us, ver. 28, are those "that love God;" and, ver. 30, they are those who are justified, and, in the end, will be as surely glorified. So that by calling here, the apostle means being called efiectually to faith and holiness by the Spirit of God, or saving conversion ; and he tells us, that those who are thus efiectually called and converted by God in time, are so called by him in pursuance of his preceding purpose and decree concerning them ; for they are called according to his purpose. He predestinated, or fore-appointed them to be conformed to the image of his Son, to be made like Christ in holiness ; and as this purpose and fore-appoint- ment of God made their sanctification and justification in- fallibly certain, so it equally secures their final glorification. For whom he did predestinate, them he called, justified, and glorified. And those who are predestinated, and fore- appointed of God to holiness and happiness, are said to be 132 TREATISE ON THE those whom he foreknew. By God's foreknowing them, we are not to understand his having a bare speculative foreknowledge of them, and of what they would be before their effectual calling; for in this sense he foreknew all others as well as them ; but his having had a special love to them, and gracious design to do them good, beyond the rest of mankind ; or it signifies his foreknowing them as his own, as those whom he had chosen and distinguished for himself, in his eternal purpose, according to what is said, " The Lord knoweth them that are his." 2 Tim. ii. 19. Thus you see, this place is a clear proof of an election and predestination to grace and salvation ; and that repre- sented so sovereign and entirely of God, as not to be founded on any qualification in the creature ; insuring both the sinner's true conversion to holiness, and his final per- severance to the heavenly glory : and all this according to God's purpose, and not their own management or behaviour. The ninth chapter of this epistle is very plain and express on this argument. In the beginning of it, the apostle speaks with reference to the unbelief of the general part of the Jewish nation : their rejection of the true Messiah ; declaring his great grief on that account. And then, in the sixth verse, he comes to speak to a difficulty which seemed to occur, concerning God's leaving the main body of the Jews to unbelief, and so casting them off from being any longer his people, taken from his word of prom- ise to Abraham, and often afterwards, that "he would be a God to him, and his seed after him for ever." It would DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 133 seem, at that time, when God had cast off that people, all to a very small remnant, and removed his church to the Gentiles, as if he had broken his word, and his promise had not been fulfilled, or taken effect. To this the apostle answers, that that was no argument that the word of God had taken no effect; and he clears it up by showing that the word of promise peculiarly respected those of Abra- ham's offspring who belonged to the election of grace ; saying, " they are not all Israel which are of Israel ;" that is, they are not all that Israel which God had principally in his eye in the promise, who belong to Israel by natural relation, or external visible union. The peculiar Israel, or children of promise, were those whom the Lord had elected and chosen among them to everlasting life ; and to these the promise was always made good, whether they were more or fewer. The promise, indeed, being a plain intima- tion that a large number belonging to the election of grace should be of Abraham's progeny, was the foundation of a visible church among them, and gave them all a right to the visible privileges of it, till they made a forfeiture them- selves. But the promise, in the full import of it, by way of engagement on God, related only to those whom he had chosen among them. That this is the apostle's meaning here, appears plainly from all that follows. For the illus- tration and confirmation of this case, he shows that God put a great limitation upon that seed of Abraham to which he particularly designed the promise in his words to Abra- ham himself, saying, " In Isaac shall thy seed be called." Hereby the Lord signified to him, that there was a greater 12 134 TREATISE ON THE number of the election to be of his posterity in Isaac's line than- in the line of Ishmael, or of any of his other sons that he should ever have, as he had several by a second marriage ; and, therefore, God would take a more special care of Isaac's oiFspring. And, indeed, no other account can be given of his distinguishing concerns about them more than the rest of Abraham's posterity ; or for his affording greater advantages to one nation than another at this day, but because of a much greater number of his elect ones being among them, because he knows whom he has chosen. And then the apostle comes to give another instance of the same kind, viz : the distinction which God made between the two branches of Isaac's offspring in the tenth and following verses, " And not only this, but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our father Isaac ; for the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works but of him that calleth, it was said unto her, the elder shall serve the younger." Here the apostle shows, that though God had said, that the seed of Abraham, which he chiefly intended in the promise of being their God, was to be in Isaac's line, yet he intended one part of Isaac's seed more than the other ; which he intimated to Rebecca before her twin-children were born, when he said, " The elder shall serve the younger." And thus he observes, there was a distinguish- ing purpose and decree of God concerning them, (before they had done any good or evil,) according to election ; which purpose of election is not of works, " but of him that DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 135 calleth," according to his own sovereign pleasure. The apostle's meaning is plainly this, that God's choosing Jacob, and a great number of his posterity, more than Esau or his posterity, was not on account of any good works to be performed by any of them, more than by the others, as the reason of it ; any more than it was on ac- count of good works already done, before they were born, when neither of them had done neither good or evil ; so, though the apostle's words very likely refer to the respec- tive posterities of those two brothers, as well as to their own persons, yet they respect their spiritual interest more than their temporal, and signify that God had many more of his elect in the posterity of Jacob than of Esau, at least, while they continued two visibly distinct bodies ; and, therefore, he took more care of Jacob's posterity, taking them into, and keeping them in, a visible church relation to himself, while he suffered the posterity of Esau to degenerate into heathenism and pagan idolatry ; so calling them off from so much as any visible relation to him, as his church. And this directly answers the apostle's purpose, which is, to show that God had a peculiar elect seed among the seed of Abraham and of Isaac, which he principally designed, and referred to, in the promise ; and, therefore, it was no argument that the word of God had failed, or taken no effect, though great bodies of their natural seed were neglected, and separated from his church ; and it was as reasonable to suppose the same thing of Jacob's seed. This election, he asserts, was not of works, but purely of him that calleth, as he pleases. And so, ver. 14, and 136 TREATISE ON THE seq., he goes on to answer the grand objection which he saw would readily be laid against the doctrine, viz : that it makes God unjust, cruel, partial, and all what not. "What shall we say then?" says he ; "Is there unright- eousness with God ? God forbid. For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion." He observes, that God had sufficiently answered the objec- tion himself in these words to Moses, Exodus xxxiii. 19, which clearly signify that all had sinned, and justly deserved the execution of his wrath ; and so were become objects of mere mercy, which he might bestow or with- hold, according to his own sovereign pleasure, without any unrighteousness. And, indeed, this is the answer that will stand for ever ; and wherewith God will one day silence all the quarrelings of haughty creatures. And in these words he declares, that as he justly might, so he really has reserved this royal sovereignty to himself, of bestowing mercy to guilty creatures, just as himself pleases ; that he will have mercy and compassion on whom he will. From whence the apostle clearly infers, ver. 16, " So then, it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy;" i. e. the election of any sinners is not at all of themselves, as being better inclined and behaved than others, but altogether of God, who bestows mercy as he pleases; "who will have mercy on whom he will have mercy ; and will have com- passion on whom he will have compassion." But I pre- sume I need prosecute the argument no farther from this DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 137 chapter ; it is fully clear already, beyond all reasonable contradiction, that it maintains the very doctrine I have undertaken to prove. And it is no less clearly maintained in the first chapter to the Ephesians : " According as he hath chosen us in him (viz : Christ) before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy, and without blame before him, in love. Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children, by Jesus Christ, to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will." Vers. 4, 5. The election which the apostle here speaks of, was more than a choosing of them to external chm-ch privileges, even an election to eternal salvation ; for he says, " God had predestinated them to the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself." " And, (as he says, Rom. viii. 17,) if children, then heirs ; heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ." Moreover, he describes them as those that were in a state of saving grace, (ver. 3,) saying, " God hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings, in heavenly places, in Christ Jesus." And then immediately adds, " according as he hath chosen us in him, before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy." Their "being blessed with all spiritual blessings in Christ," was according to God's foregoing choice of them ; it was the fruit of a gracious and eternal purpose to that end ; and they were chosen, not because they would be holy, but that they should be holy ; their goodness was not the cause, but the effect of their election. And, (ver. 5,) they were predestinated, or fore-appointed, to be the children of God, not according to their good works, or dispositions, but 12* 138 TREATISE ON THE according to the good pleasure of his will ; not to their own praise, but to the praise of the glory of his grace ; as it follows (ver. 6). And very expressly, to the same purpose, he says, (ver. 11,) " In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the coun- sel of his own will." We are not predestinated to the heavenly inheritance, says he, according to the purpose of one who proceeds according to the will and behaviour of others ; but " according to the purpose of him who does all things after the counsel of his own will." Another place of scripture, very expressly asserting an absolute election, you may see in 2 Tim. i. 9. " God hath saved us, and called us with an holy calling, not according to our works, but according to his own purpose and grace, which was given us in Christ Jesus before the world began." The plain meaning of these words, if they can be made plainer, is, as if the apostle had said, " God hath saved us, and effectually called us, out of a state of sin to holiness ; and this is not to be ascribed to any works or endeavours of ours, as the reason of it, but to his 0"\vn sovereign purpose and grace, or free favour ; which grace was made sure to us in Christ, by the Father's engagement to him in the eternal covenant of redemption before the world began." This is a natural and easy paraphrase upon the words, though indeed they do not need any; I am very sure, if they were found anywhere else but in the Bible, every one would readily acknowledge they contained the Calvinistic doctrine of election. See also 2 Thess. ii. DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 139 13, 14, 1 Pet. 1, 2, John xv. 16, with many other places of scripture, which it is needless to mention. But besides these direct and immediate testimonies of scriptui'e to the doctrine, it may be farther clearly proved from such scripture passages as declare the absoluteness and sovereignty of God's proceeding in the effectual calling and conversion of sinners to himself. If God, in the regeneration and conversion of sinners, proceeds in an absolute sovereign way, calling whom he will, without regarding their previous motion and behaviour, as the reason of his proceeding, on which it is suspended ; then his choosing of them must be absolute, and sovereign too ; for actual renovation in time is just the fruit and execution of the eternal purpose ; and therefore the one must exactly answer to the other. Many are the places of scripture which plainly teach us that God's renewing and converting of any sinners is wholly owing to his sovereign, distinguishing favour and mercy, and not to any dis- tinguishing goodness of their own. I shall just only select a few. What can be more express to this purpose than these words? "For we ourselves also were some- times foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another. But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared, not by works '.of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy, he saved us, by the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost." Tit. iii. 3 — 5. In the same manner, the apostle speaks in the second chapter to the 140 TREATISE ON THE Ephesians : " And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins ; wherein, in time past, ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience. Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past, in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the decrees of the flesh and the mind ; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, by grace ye are saved." Oh, sirs, thousands that are now in heaven, would have been in hell, had God waited for their good works, or preparing themselves for his grace, before he had laid hold of them by converting power. And what great excellency is there in all the good works, falsely so called, of an unregenerate sinner, when he has done them, to engage God to save him? How clearly is the free, absolute sovereignty of God in the eff'ectual calling, declared (1 Cor. i. 26 — 30). " For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called. But God hath chosen the foolish things of this world, to confound the wise ; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world, to confound the things which are mighty ; and base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen ; yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are ; that no flesh should glory in his presence." Here you see, God calls just whom he will, among the guilty children of men. Some of the DOCTRINE OF PKEDESTINATION. 141 high and mighty of the world ; but more generally he has ordered it that those whom he designs to call, shall be poor and mean in all worldly respects ; and the general rea- son is, to dash down all human pride, that no flesh should glory in his presence ; but that he that glorieth, should glory only in the Lord, ver. 31. And it is remarkable how the apostle alters the term ; after he had begun with " calling," he puts in "choosing" in the place of it ; because temporal vocation exactly corresponds to eternal election, as the cer- tain consequence and evidence of it; and the one is as free and absolute as the other, so that it was equal which of the terms he used. Numbers of Scripture instances prove this truth. What good works of obedience to Christ had Paul done ? Or what good dispositions had he towards Him, before He reached him by his powerful grace, to induce the Lord to choose and call him ? Were not great num- bers of his nation, as good as he, left to perish in unbelief? What were the good works and dispositions of Abraham, more than others, when God called him, as he was serving other gods on the other side of the flood, with the rest of his father's house? (Josh. xxiv. 2) of whom the Lord says, (Isa. li. 2,) " I called him alone, and blessed him." This argument is so clear and certain in all its parts, that I think it would be quite superfluous to bestow any more pains upon it. Again, the doctrine of absolute election appears from the only way of fallen sinners' salvation, as it is laid down and declared in the gospel, viz : the way of believing only and entirely in the merit and righteousness of the Lord 142 TREATISE ON THE Jesus for actual reconciliation with God. The argument here may be thus formed : that doctrine which leaves no room for guilty sinners to rest and depend on anything but the merit and atonement of Jesus Christ only, for the reconciled favour of God, and their acceptance with him ; the contrary of which does give room to sinners to rest, and depend also, on something else for reconciliation and acceptance with God, must be true, and its contrary false, according to the Scriptures. But the doctrine of absolute election leaves no room for guilty sinners to rest and de- pend on anything for the reconciled favour of God, and their acceptance with him, but the merit and atonement of Jesus Christ only ; and the contrary doctrine does give them room to rest, and depend also, on something else for it, viz : something in them, or done by them ; therefore, the doctrine of absolute election is true, and the contrary doctrine false, according to the Scriptures. The Scripture clearly teaches us to look only to the merit and atonement of Christ's obedience and sufferings for actiial justification before God, and reconciliation with him ; and it is as clear, that the doctrine of sinners being chosen in Christ, and fore-appointed to justification and eternal life through him, of God's mere, sovereign, free grace, agrees well with this ; it cuts all the sinews of self- dependence, and leaves the sinner no other foundation to cast himself upon, but the sovereign mercy of God, through a redeeming Saviour. And I think it is as clear again, on the other hand, that the opposite doctrine of a conditional election, founded either upon the actual existence DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 143 of some good in, or done by the sinner, or upon the fore- sight of it to be in him, or done by him, lays a foundation for self-dependence, and so tends to keep undone sinners from closing with Christ in the way of the gospel. This delusive opinion makes poor creatures swell very big with a conceit of themselves, and what they do. When they imagine their qualifications and doings are of such price with God, it makes them halve the procurement of their salvation between Christ's righteousness and their own, which he will never bear. It makes them patch their filthy rags and menstruous cloaths to his complete, un- spotted robe, for a joint recommendation of them to God's acceptance. Indeed, I cannot see a material difference between Arminian Protestants and the Papists, about the doctrine of justification. And I find two great bishops, one of each sort, of my mind. Says Bishop Burnet, in his Exposition (more properly, pervei^sion) of the thirty-nine articles of the Church of England, page 126, " This matter was so stated by many of the writers of the Church of Rome, after the Reformation, that, as to the main of it, we have no just exception to it." The bishop of Meaux, in his Exposition of the doctrine of the Catholic Church, page 93, after he has been explaining their sense and jus- tification, and merit of good works, says, "And, indeed, we must acknowledge, that the learned of their party (meaning the Reformed) do not contend so much of late about this subject, as they did formerly ; and there are but few who do not ; there ought not to have been a breach on this point. But if this important difficulty about justi- 144 TREATISE ON THE fication, upon which their first authors laid all their stress, be not looked upon now as essential by the wisest persons among them, we leave them to think what they ought to judge of their separation ; and what hopes there would be of a union, if they would but overcome their prejudice, and quit the spirit of contention." Thus we see Protestants and Papists cordially shaking hands, and agreeing again in one of the most material matters of difference. And all the contest remaining is, which side has made the approach to the other. The one says, "You have come to us;" the other says, " No ; but you have come to us." And this, I believe, will be judged but a small matter for brethren to fall out about. However, I think I might venture, in a court of equity, to undertake to obtain sentence, upon this plea, in favour of the Romish gentleman. The last argument I shall offer, for confirmation of this doctrine, shall be taken from the declared scope and de- sign of God in the gospel, which is, as it is highly reason- able, to secure the whole glory of sinners' salvation to him- self, and for ever hide pride from man. He assures us, he has so concerted the scheme and laid the plan, that the saved sinner shall not have the least ground to boast, or glory ; which evidently proves, that election is not condi- tional, founded on sinners' good works or dispositions ; but absolute, founded on God's good pleasure. For upon the conditional scheme, the justified, converted person has it to ascribe to himself, that he, more than another, is in such a happy state. The reason cannot be God's dis- tinguishing love and grace to him, beyond others, but his DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 145 own distinguishing goodness; for the others are supposed to have had as much love and kindness from God as he. Whence, then, came the difference that is between them? Not from God, for he made no difference ; but from him- self. And does not this give some ground for boasting in the case — to arrogate some glory and praise to himself? But the true gospel- way of salvation will not, in the least, admit of any such thing. It is cross to God's declared view and design in it. "For by grace ye are saved, through faith ; and that not of yourselves : it is the gift of God. Not of works, lest any man should boast." Eph. ii. 8, 9. The way which God has laid for sinners' salvation, is such, that it precludes and bars against all boasting in those that are saved ; and, therefore, it is not of works, but through faith, which is a soul-humbling, self-emptying grace, and a gift of God's royal bounty, which he bestows at pleasure. Rom. iii. 27. After the apostle has clearly laid down the true gospel way of guilty sinners' justification and salvation, through the alone righteousness of Christ, imputed in a way of believing, he asks, " Where is boast- ing then?" and answers, "It is excluded; not by the law of works, but by the law of faith." All boasting is entirely excluded by that method which God has established ; and hence, we may, with abundant evidence, conclude that that doctrine which affords any room for glorying and boasting is not of God, being directly contrary to the plan and design of the gospel. Having now, I think, with great clearness, from God's word of truth, proved the doctrine of absolute, unconditional 13 146 TREATISE ON THE election, I proceed, in the next place, to prove, that those of guilty mankind, whom God did not thus choose to ever- lasting life and salvation through Christ, he determined to leave in their guilty state, and inflict upon them their deserved punishment. And upon this branch of predesti- nation I need be but short, because it is abundantly proven already by the proof of the former ; for the one is a necessary consequence of the other. If God determined to deal with guilty mankind in such a sovereign way as has been proved, making his own righteous, sovereign pleasure, the only rule of procedure towards them, then it necessarily follows, that such as he did not ordain to life, he did ordain to deserved death. To suppose an absolute and certain election of a part of guilty sinners to be redeemed and saved, and yet, that the rest are not reprobated or rejected, are very inconsistent notions ; for, seeing all mankind were looked upon and considered by God, in his decrees, as under a righteous sentence of condemnation to punishment for their sin, then, sure, such as he did not determine to deliver out of that condemnation and ruin, were left in it, to suffer the law. To say, " that they were all elected con- ditionally, though the others were absolutely," is as contrary to those scriptures which have been adduced, as to deny an absolute election altogether ; for they assert election to be universally absolute, contrary to such a distinction of a two-fold election. It is a notion, especially contrary to those passages which declare the absoluteness of effectual calling in all those that are so called ; and those passages which declare, that all that are saved, are saved in such a DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 147 way as excludes all self-glorying and self-depending. But I proceed to offer a few other proofs from the scripture, for the confirmation of this head. And, first, I argue thus : those who are not given in charge by the Father to Jesus Christ, to be redeemed and saved by him, were left in their sins, and ordained to suffer the law for them themselves. But those who were not certainly elected to salvation, were not given in charge by the Father to Jesus Christ, to be redeemed and saved by him : therefore, they were left in their sins, and ordained to suffer the law for them them- selves. That those, who were not certainly elected to salvation, were not given in charge by the Father to Jesus Christ, to be redeemed and saved by him, is plain from this, that all those who were given in charge to Jesus Christ, to be redeemed and saved by him, shall certainly be saved by him; and were certainly and infallibly ordained to be so. This is clearly proved from the words of Christ ; " For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me. And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me, I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day." John vi. 38, 39. These words, I think, plainly say, that all such as are not in the end actually saved by Jesus Christ, if he be faithful to his trust, were not committed to his charge, to be redeemed by him, and consequently they were left under the con- demnatory sentence of the law. Another proof, that those whom God has not absolutely 148 TREATISE ON THE elected to salvation, lie has left to perish, and abandoned from his saving care, you have in Rom. xi. 7, where, after the apostle has said, that the remnant of Israel, which God had reserved to himself, according to the election of grace, had obtained righteousness and life ; he adds, " and the rest were blinded." Very full and express to the same purpose are those words, " Christ is a stone of stumbling, and a rock of oifence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient, whereunto also they were appointed." 2 Pet. ii. 8. God appointed to leave them to blindness, stumbling, and disobedience ; which things are always con- sequent upon God's leaving any to themselves. This doctrine of sinners' rejection or reprobation in the eternal purpose of God, is indeed, I acknowledge, a very awful and solemn one ; especially to those who do not find in them the comfortable evidences of election ; and might reasonably excite in them a deep concern about the great concerns of their souls, and stir them up to take no peaceful rest, till they find in themselves the hopeful tokens of God's electing love, in a supernatural work of renewing, sanctifying grace in their souls. But then let us take care, that we do not charge God foolishly and wickedly in the case, as if he were cruel and unrighteous. What, if God was willing to show his wrath, and to make his power known, upon the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction, and worthy of death, who can justly find fault with him? What, if he had reprobated all apostate mankind, as well as all apostate angels, who could say, he had done wrong ? DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 149 Every moutli must have been stopped, all the world being guilty before him. But I come to speak to the objections, commonly urged from the scriptures against the foregoing doctrine, in both its branches. And here I shall first take notice of the method which those on the other side of the question, put a main confidence in, for the overthrowing of this doc- trine, by going about to prove a universal redemption ; that Christ died equally for all, and every individual of mankind ; for one as much as another. This, they think, they can very easily prove from such places of scripture, as speak of his dying " for all men ; for all the world ; for the whole world ; for every man ;" and the like. But these universal expressions of scripture will not amount to sufficient proof of what they bring them for, for all so plain as they think they are for them. If such universal terms of scripture must of n'ecessity be understood in such a large extent as they might seem to carry in them, we shall then as easily prove many other things from scrip- ture which no man of common sense will beleive to be' intended in it. For instance, as readily and plainly as they will prove that Christ laid down his life for every individual person of Adam's race ; as plainly, I say will I prove that every individual person of Adam's race will have praise from God at the day of Judgment ; from 1 Cor. iv. 5, where the apostle says, " Then shall every man have praise of God." As plainly and fully will I prove, that after John the Baptist's preaching every individual of mankind pressed into the kingdom of God; from Luke 13* 150 TREATISE ON TUB xvi. 16, " Since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it." And by the same rule you may have it proved that every human creature spoke of the faith of the Christians at Rome. " Your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world." Rom. i. 8. These few examples, instead of great numbers which might be produced, are sufficient to show that such universal terms in scripture must be often understood under very great restrictions ; and quite in another sense than our opponents will allow, when they are used concerning the death of Christ. Some of those places of scripture, where such universal terms are used, concerning Christ's death, and the effect of it, only signify the virtue and efficacy of it, to those who partake of the benefits of it. Some others signify that his death was designed promiscuously for some of all nations, and all ranks and conditions of men, as not confined to any one particular nation, or degree of mankind. Others again only mean, that Christ is the only Saviour, that none are saved but through his death. In the first sense, we are to understand Rom. v. 18. The design of that whole chapter is to show that Christ's death and satisfaction is of sufficient virtue for the justifying and saving of the most guilty sinners. For this purpose the apostle observes the efficacy of Adam's sin, and breaking the law, to the condemning of those to whom it was charged and imputed, declaring that much more is Christ's fulfilling the law effectual to the complete justification of those to whom it is imputed, notwithstanding their former condemnation. And so, when he says, that " as by the DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 151 offence of one, judgment came upon all men to condemna- tion : even so, by the righteousness of one, the free gift came upon all men to justification of life," his meaning is, that as the offence and disobedience of Adam prevailed to the condemning of those to whom it reached, and was imputed, even so the righteousness of Christ was suffi- ciently effectual to the full justification of those to whom it was imputed, from the guilt of that offence, and all others, so as to entitle them again to eternal life. So that the apostle's design is not at all to run a parallel between Adam's offence and Christ's righteousness, in the extent of their influence and effects ; but to compare the one with the other, as to the efficacy of their influence ; in respect of which he observes that Christ's righteousness is much superior, as it justifies to life, even after Adam's sin has condemned to death. And thus the phrase, " all men," in both parts of the verse, is to be understood with this limi- tation, viz : all men on whom it came. In the first part of the verse, judgment came upon all men, on whom it came, to condemnation ; i. e., so as to condemn them. In the latter part, the free gift came upon all men, on whom it came, to justification of life ; i. e., so as to justify them to life. I presume, if every man had been in the text, instead of all men, the Universalists would have thought it every whit as strong for their purpose as they do now. And you may see how that this phrase must be understood the same way, Mark viii. 25, * where it is said of the man * I accomodate myself here to those who understand only the English translation. The term in the original is in the plural number, all men 152 TREATISE ON THE that had been blind, to whom Jesus Christ gave sight, that he saw every man clearly ; which cannot be understood of the extent of his sight, that he saw every man that was in the world; but of the strength and efficacy of his sight, that he saw every man, whom he did see, clearly. It is indeed true, that by the offence of Adam, judgment came upon every individual of his pos- terity, except the human nature of Jesus Christ, to con- demnation ; and this verse is a clear and certain proof of it. But then, I conceive it is not the universality of the term here that proves it ; it is as fully proved from the next verse as from this, where it is only said, that by his disobedience many were made sinners ; because the impu- tation of his sin at all, is evidence enough that it is impu- ted to all and every one that descends from him in the ordinary way of generation ; seeing his relation was the same to all, as the natural and common parent of the hu- man race. But, farther, there is this plain reason, evin- cing that the universal term here must be understood in this limited sense, viz : because if it be understood in the large, extensive sense in which the Arminians will have it, it will prove a great deal too much for them, not a uni- versal, conditional, redemption which they contend for, but a universal, absolute redemption and salvation. It will then prove that every individual of the human race is actually justified to eternal life, by the righteousness of Christ; and we are sure, that whom he justified, them he as well as in Rom. v. 18. But it is as equal to the sense, which of the ways it is rendered. DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 153 al30 glorified, (Rom. viii. 30.) Thus you see the true sense of this text, and manifest design of the whole con- text, destroy all foundation of an argument for universal redemption. The proper import and design of those words, (1 John ii' 2,) " He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world," is, that the death of Christ was a propitiation, or atonement, not only for people among the Jews, or for those who were then believers in those parts of the world, but also for some, be they more or less, in all parts and ages of the world ; for he was to be God's salvation unto the ends of the earth. When the apostle says, (1 Tim. ii. 6,) that " Christ gave himself a ransom for all," it appears from the context, that he means persons of all ranks and degrees ; for he brings it in as an argument to enforce his exhortation to pray for kings, and all that are in authority. The same universal term he manifestly intends in the same sense, in the first verse, when he says, " I exhort, therefore, that first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men." He cannot mean, sure, that they should pray for the millions of men that were dead, and gone to their own place before that time. Neither can he intend, that they should pray for such as the apostle John excludes from an interest in our prayers, (1 John V. 16) : " There is a sin unto death : I do not say, that a man shall pray for it ;" that is, for such as are guilty of it. But he explains his meaning to be for men of all stations and degrees, the high as well as the low, 154 TREATISE ON THE adding, " for kings, and all that are in authority." When the apostle says, (Heb. ii. 9,) that "Christ tasted death for every man," the meaning is, for every man that is saved ; to signify, that none are saved but through Christ's death, that his death is the only purchase of salvation for any man. In the same limited manner we must understand the same term, (Col. i. 28,) "We preach Christ, warning every man, and teaching every man," that is, warning and teaching every man to whom we have an opportunity to preach. So, (1 Cor. iv. 5,) " When the Lord comes to judgment, every man shall have praise of God;" that is, every man that is saved, or has been truly godly. Another place of scripture, which is brought in to serve the cause of universal redemption, is, (2 Pet. ii. 1,) where the apostle speaks of some who should privily bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. But the apostle only speaks of the Lord's having bought them, as what might have been hoped concerning them as well as others. The gospel revelation of a Saviour that died to redeem sinners, affords ground to all to whom it comes, to hope that his death might have been designed for them as well as others, (though it was not intended for all and every one alike,) seeing it does not point out the persons, in par- ticular, for whom he did not intend the benefits of his death. And so, concerning these persons here, the apostle mentions it as a high aggravation of their crime, that they should deny that Redeemer, of whom they had no reason to conclude to the contrary but that he had bought and DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 155 redeemed them, when they had the same ground of hope this way that any others had, before they had the special evidences of it in renewing grace. Thus I have considered some of the most material passa- ges of Scripture which are advanced in favour of universal redemption ; and I think any considerate person might see, from what has been said, that they come far short of answering the design they are advanced for; and any other passages of the like strain are to be understood the same way. I have already mentioned a place of Scripture, (John vi. 39,) which proves that all those who were given to Christ to redeem, he will surely save, and finally glorify, unless it may be said he was unfaithful to his charge ; for it was " the will of him that sent him, that he should lose none of them, but raise them up again at the last day," and so put the finishing stroke to their full glorification ; which confirms a particular redemption, in opposition to a universal. In the tenth chapter of John our Lord speaks of a peculiar people, which he had both among the Jews and Gentiles, whom he calls his sheep ; for whom, he says, he laid down his life. And, (John xvii,) he speaks of those whom the Father had given him, as distinct from the rest of mankind. For these, he says, he prays, and not for the world, ver. 9 ; and, ver. 19, he says, " For their sakes I sanctify myself;" that is, it is for their sakes that I set myself apart to the ofiice and charge of a Redeemer, and devote myself to be a sacrifice. I shall only farther point out, as briefly as may be, some absurdities attending the doctrine of universal redemption, 156 TREATISE ON THE and so dismiss it. If God sent his Son to die for sinners, with an equal view and design to save them all by it, intend- ing as much the salvation of one as another, without any diiference, then it will follow, that those who are saved are no more beholden or obliged to God than those who perish ; and it was not from him that they were saved any more than others, but from themselves ; and so he shall not have the glory of it ; nay, he is rather beholden to them, for letting him have his end. Again, it will follow, that God, in a great measure, comes short of obtaining his end and design, and that in the greatest affair that ever he under- took, so far as we are acquainted; an end which he was so intent upon, that he spared not his own Son, but delivered him up to the death, that he might obtain it. The end which he was intently set upon, was the salvation of all the human race; and yet he is greatly disappointed of it, for great numbers for ever perish. Now, how can any man reasonably persuade himself, that God really pro- posed to himself, and intended such an end, and yet did not make it sure, and ascertain the attainment of it ? Was it not easy to his power to do it? Has he not the hearts of all men in his hands ? Would it have done them any injustice to have persuaded them by almighty power, and made them willing to be happy? But seeing he has not done so, it is plain that the salvation of all was not the end and design he had in view in sending his Son into the world to die. Would he have left a design he had so much at heart, upon the precarious bottom (to say the best of it that they can say) of the free-will of corrupted crea- DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 157 tures, that were no way well affected toward him, but awfully disaffected? Nay, farther, it will follow, that it might have so happened as that he would have entirely lost his end altogether; for all so seriously as he intended it, and was set upon it, yet it seems he did not make it certain ; no, not as to the salvation of any one soul, but left it altogether to themselves. One would think by this, that he was not very intent upon it, for all the great pre- tences of some, by this doctrine, to magnify his love and good-will to men. And it may be considered which doc- trine magnifies the love of God most — that which renders the salvation of a considerable number infallibly certain, or that which leaves it altogether uncertain as to any, leaving it entirely to the good pleasure of their depraved wills ? I believe it will be found that more will be saved in that way, than would have been in this ; for, I think, upon this score, none at all would be saved. However, it is plain that great multitudes do finally oppose and contra- dict this supposed intention of God ; and what hinders but all the rest might do so too, according to the universal scheme ; and not so much as one be saved after all ? for all are alike opposite to the way of salvation by nature. But you will say, perhaps, there was no danger of such a disappointment and frustration of God's end as this, for he foreknew who would comply with the gospel, and be saved, and so knew that he would not altogether fail of his design. But this is so far from clearing the doctrine, that it intro- duces a new absurdity ; for how can it be conceived that God could really intend and design the death of Christ, and the 14 158 TREATISE ON THE benefit of it, for those who he infallibly knew would never be partakers of it ? Is it not an absurdity, may not I say impossibility, in the very nature of the thing? To what purpose was the death of Christ designed for them, or for what advantage ? Not to save them, for that the Lord knew would never be. And every designing of an end includes in it some degree of expectation, which could not be in this case. Was it to purchase sufficient grace for them, that so they might be saved if they would ? Well, but the Lord knew that they would not make the saving use of it ; and why then was it intentionally purchased for them ? Sure, you will not say it was to make their guilt and punishment the greater. Let the admirers of univer- sal redemption consider a little, how they will digest and solve these things. But to proceed, The opposers of the doctrine of absolute decrees argue farther against it, from some places of scripture, which they suppose declare a general will and desire in God of the conversion and salvation of all sinners, and how much he would be pleased with it ; which they suppose is con- trary to his having purposed not to give to some the grace necessary and sufficient for their conversion, but to leave them to perish in their sins. I shall a little consider the principal passages which they advance to this purpose, and shew that they intend nothing contrary to this doctrine. One of them is (1 Tim. ii. 4,) " God will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth." If all men, here be understood for every individual man in the world, then God's willing them to be saved, cannot DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 159 mean his having willed and purposed that they shall be saved ; for then they all would be saved, because he can easily fulfill all his purposes, and surely will do so. " For his counsel shall stand, and he will do all his pleasure." Isa, xlvi. 10. " The counsel of the Lord standeth for ever, and the thoughts of his heart to all generations." Psa. xxxiii. 11. But if the words be taken in this unlimited sense, the meaning of the place must only be, that the salvation of all men, in the way of faith and holiness, would be a thing very agreeable to the approving and pre- ceptive will of God, as he delights in holiness, and the happiness which is connected with it ; and that sin, for which it is that any perish, is disagreeable and hateful to his holy nature ; and yet, all this is no way inconsistent with his determining to punish sinners for their sin. But I think it is plain, from the context, that by all men here, we are to understand, men of all characters and degrees ; for the words are brought in as an argument to encourage christians to pray for kings, and for all that are in authority. And in the same sense, the term all men is in- tended in the first verse, as I have made appear before. Another place is (2 Pet. iii. 9), " The Lord is not slack concerning his promise ; but is long suffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." I think it is pretty manifest, that the per- sons the apostle speaks of here, are the elect of God ; the persons to whom he writes these epistles, are considered under that character. In his first epistle, (chap. i. 2,) he calls them " elect, according to the foreknoAvledge of God 160 TREATISE ON THE the Father, through the sanctification of the Spirit unto obedience, and to the sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ." And in the first verse of this chapter Ave are informed that he writes this second epistle to the same, or same sort of persons ; and of the same he speaks in the verse under our present consideration, joining himself, as being also an elect person with them ; saying, " The Lord is long suffering to us-ward ;" i. e., towards us, the election of his grace, not willing that any, viz : of us, should per- ish, but that we all should come to repentance, and be called in. The apostle's design, in the words, is to show the reason of God's delaying to put an end to the present state of this world, and bring on the general judgment ; in answer to the scoffers, that he says should be in the last days, saying, " Where is the promise of his coming ? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation." Ver. 3, 4. In answer, I say, to these atheistical scoffs, he observes that God had done as great, unlikely, and unexpected things already, as the shutting up the scene of this world in such a solemn manner, though they wilfully neglected to take notice of them. He had not only, by the word of his power, created the heavens and the earth out of nothing at first, but a long time after had destroyed the earth and its ungodly inhabitants by a flood of water ; and so it was no incredible, nor unlikely thing, that he should, at last, burn it with fire at the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men ; and notwithstanding it had stood so long, in much the same state, after the people of God had spoke DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 161 of this, as what would surely be, he observes that a long space of time with us is but little with God ; and then says, " the Lord is not slack concerning his promise, (as some men count slackness,) but is long suffering to us-ward, &c. ;" that is, the Lord's deferring the end of the world and last judgment so long, is not through forgetfulness or care- less neglect of his promise to that purpose ; but the true reason of it is, that all his elect may be brought in, not being willing that any of them should perish, but that all should come to repentance, be converted and saved ; and therefore he will not come to judgment at a time when there are any of them on the earth unconverted, nor until the last of the whole number is fitted for glory. There is another scripture that is always brought in upon this head of argument, (Ezek. xxxiii. 11,) where the Lord declares, with the solemnity of an oath, " As I live, saith the Lord, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but that the wicked turn from his way, and live." When the Lord says he has no pleasure in the death of the wicked, the plain sense of the words is, that the death and misery of sinners is not a pleasure to him in itself, or for its own sake, merely as it is a misery to the creature. But this does not say, but that their death and punishment may be agreeable and pleasing to him under other con- siderations ; as it is an execution of justice, and manifesta- tion of his own glory. If it were not so, would he inflict punishment upon any of them ? Would he displease and make himself uneasy? And when he says that it is a pleasure to him, that the wicked turn from his way, and 14* 162 TREATISE ON THE live, the meaning is, that righteousness and holiness in his creatures, and the happiness consequent upon it, is the object of his approbation and liking, a thing in itself agreeable and pleasing to his holy nature. But this, sure, is no proof that he equally and alike designed the sancti- fication and salvation of all sinners. If it proved any- thing this way, it would prove that he designed it certainly for them all, if his power could effect it. The words of our Lord, (Matt, xxiii. 37,) are often brought in upon this head, where he says of Jerusalem, " How often would I have gathered thy children, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!" If we understand the Lord Jesus to speak here of his willingness to have gathered them, with reference to his divine nature, as God, the words only prove, that sinners' compliance with the gospel, and turn- ing to holiness, is a thing in itself agreeable and pleasing to God's holy nature : holiness being the object of his love and complacence ; that his dealings with that people, in the course of his ministry among them, tended in their own nature to bring them thus to duty ; and that their unbelief and impenitency was owing to the perverseness and corruption of their own wills, as the cause of it. But if we suppose him to speak of his willingness merely as man, in his human nature, then I see no inconvenience in allowing that it might signify an intense and passionate desire in him of their conversion and happiness. But, surely, no such passions, or uneasy long desires, and especially for things which will never be effected, are to be DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 163 ascribed to tlie divine nature. For my part, I cannot apprehend what sort of a will and desire for the conversion and salvation of all men, it is, which those who deny absolute predestination, suppose to be in God, any way consistent with his perfections. They suppose it includes much more than that the holiness and happiness of his creatures is a thing in itself lovely and agreeable to him ; that it is his preceptive and approving will that they should be holy, and consequently happy : which is very consistent with the doctrine they oppose, from this topic of a general will ; and they cannot allow it to include so much as a real purpose that all shall be sanctified and saved ; because then all would be so, which is contrary to fact, or else God's purpose would be frustrated, and he would come short of what he certainly intended would come to pass, which is highly absurd. But they seem to fancy a sort of an uneasy wishing and longing desire ♦in God for that which, notwithstanding, will never be; and if this be not to make God such a one as ourselves, I know not what is. Does it not argue God to be subject to the weaknesses of creatures ? And not only so, but that he suffers himself to be made uneasy, and to be crossed in his desires by that which he could easily prevent, which is what no wise man would allow in himself; and, therefore, though God may sometimes condescend to speak to sinners in such language as they use to one another, when they would express the greatness and ardency of their desire for anything, yet we are not hence to imagine that there are any such human passions and creature-weaknesses in 164 TREATISE ON THE him. The design of such modes of speaking in God, is only to signify how desirable and excellent a thing it is in itself, for creatures to love, to obey and honour him, and how much it is both their interest and duty to do so. And the reason why this is expressed in such a manner as im- ports weak passions in men when they speak so, is because it is the most suitable way of dealing with such creatures as we are, best adapted to our capacity and condition ; it is a method that has the most suitable tendency in itself to work upon and prevail with rational creatures, express- ing best to their capacity the excellency and necessity of holiness, and the horrid, hateful nature of sin : for, though it is the supernatural power of God's Spirit that prevails with any sinners to be holy, yet, as a wise agent, he makes use of the most suitable and best adapted means for that purpose, dealing with men in a way suited to their rational nature and human capacities. Thus it is we are to under- Btand the various expostulations and entreaties of God in- the scriptures. As another topic of argument against the doctrine of God's decrees, the opposers of it seem to think that all men have sufficient power to do that which is required as necessary to salvation, and with which salvation is cer- tainly connected; or, at least, that they have sufficient power to ensure to themselves such supernatural power as is necessary for that purpose ; and this is what is commonly called universal, sufficient grace. For the support of this opinion they refer to such passages of scripture, in which God commands all men where the gospel comes, to be holy DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 165 as he is holy, to repent and believe in Jesus Christ, to make themselves new hearts, &c. Hence they argue that all have power some way to do these things, because, they say, it would be unjust for God to require more of men than they can perform. To this I answer, that these men seem entirely to overlook, in this way of reasoning, the ruin brought upon the human offspring by the fall and apostasy of Adam, the covenant-head and representative of all mankind. He, indeed, until he sinned, was furnished with sufficient ability to do whatsoever God did or ever should require of him ; at least, had he not sinned, his ability would always have been increased equally with his obligations ; there was a full proportion between his power and the law he was under. And so it would have been with all his posterity, had he fulfilled the conditions of the covenant; but as, by his transgression, they lost all right and title to that happiness, and life of communion with God, which was secured to them in the covenant, upon his obedience, so they lost God's moral image, and the power of holy obedience; and it was at God's free, sovereign pleasure to confer happiness again, and the grace necessary to it, as he pleased. And as God then was under no obli- gation to afford strength answerable to the law, so neither was he obliged to bring down the requirements of his law to the level and capacity of the fallen, ruined creature. Though man, by his own default, has lost his power of obe- dience, that is no argument that God must lose his right and claim ; the creature's sin and wretchedness thereby, cannot dissolve his obligations of duty to God ; God's law 166 TREATISE ON THE must still remain the same, as a perfect and eternal rule of righteousness, let creatures change and alter as they will. If it be asked, for what end the law of God is set before us, and his commandments laid upon us in his word, if we have not ability to fulfil ? I answer, for various ends ; to teach us what is our duty to God ; what we ought to be aiming at, and endeavouring after ; to show us our sins and transgressions, "for by the law is the knowledge of sin," (Rom. iii. 20,) as the crookedness of a line is discovered by laying it to a straight one ; to teach us our utter inability to fulfil the law, and obtain life for our obedience ; for which purposp our Saviour referred one to the keeping of the commandments, (Matt. xix. 17,) whom he found big with the conceit that he could do much ; that so we may see our necessity of getting righteousness and strength from Christ, a mediator ; and thus the law is given as a school- master to bring us to Christ. It is a means whereby the Lord brings in his elect to the Redeemer by faith ; and it is given as a rule of life to the renewed children of God, to direct them how they are to honour and glorify him. If it be objected to the above account of sinners' inability to do what is now required of them under the dis- pensation of the new covenant, that Adam had not the power of believing in a Redeemer, or repenting and renewing his heart, as having no need of it, and the exercise of it being inconsistent with his state of innocence ; and therefore we cannot be said to have lost it in him, seeing it was not given him while he stood in the character of our representative — to this it may be easily replied. DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 167 that though he had not his power for such acts and pur- poses as these, in his innocent state ; yet, had we, in our guilty state, that power restored which he had, we would be able to believe in the Redeemer, to repent, &c. The impossibility of his putting forth such acts, was not from the want of inherent power, but the inconsistency of them with his condition. It was inconsistent with his state of innocence, to have any occasion for administering physic, to recover his health ; yet this is no argument that he had not sufficient ability for it. I would just farther refer it to the consideration of those who offer this argument against God's decrees, and yet, in the meantime, acknowledge that no man in this life can fulfil the law of God perfectly, how they are consistent with themselves : for herein themselves acknowledge that God requires more of men than they can now perform, since the fall ; and, sui'e, they will not own it is so, and say it is unjust too. For further proof of this universal power, or grace, they urge the invitations of the gospel to believe in Christ, and its promises to such as do believe. Such as (Isa. xiv. 22), " Look unto me, and be ye saved, all the ends of the earth:" and (Rev. iii. 20), "Behold, I stand at the door, and knock ; if any man hear my voice and open the door, I will come in to him," &c. Such invitations, they think, infer that there is a power in man to comply with them, otherwise they would be vain and needless. But this is a vain argument. For, though sinners are without strength, through the darkness of their minds, and obstinacy of 168 TREATISE ON THE their wills ; yet such invitations are needful, to show them their dutj, and the only way in which they can ever be happy ; and to afford them a ground and warrant for believing in Jesus Christ, and resting their souls upon him for salvation. By these invitations, and promises to believing, the Holy Spirit encourages and persuades con- vinced souls to close with Christ, as their Saviour, and cast themselves upon his mediation and atonement, with humble, joyful confidence. The Spirit of God, by his power, brings a sinner to believe in Christ, in a way agreeable to his nature, as a reasonable creature ; and so make use of the offers and promises of the gospel, as the soul's warrant for laying claim to Christ, as his Saviour, and believing in him for his salvation. Likewise, these invitations and promises are of great use for the comfort of true believers, showing there is a sure connection between believing and salvation. When Moses tells the people of Israel (Deut. xxx. 19), " that he had set life and death before them, blessing and cursing, and bids them choose life ;" the words may be easily understood in the same sense with the fore-mentioned passages, to signify that there is a certain and inseparable connection between true holiness and eternal life, though this holiness is the effect of a supernatural divine power, exerted only in whom the Lord pleases : and the Lord proposes this holiness, which is connected with happiness, to sinners' choice, to import the reasonableness and necessity of their choosing it ; and that he may deal with them in a way agreeable to the nature of reasonable beings. But yet, I think it is DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 169 plain from tlie context, tliat the life and death there spoken of was temporal prosperity and adversity ; which life was promised to that people, upon their strict adherence to the outward prescriptions of the law that was given them : and it will be readily owned that they might thus choose and perform obedience without special renewing grace : and, in this sense, righteousness and life are to be frequently understood in the Old Testament. It is farther argued, for this universal grace, from the parable of the talents (Matt, xxv.) But we are not to understand by these talents, universal, sufficient grace, whereby all men are enabled to convert themselves, if they will, and savingly to renew and change their wills ; but other gifts and bounties of divine Providence, such as natural endowments of mind, good education, health, worldly goods, outward gospel privileges, and the like, which God distributes to mankind in various measures, as he pleases. Those who made such improvement of their talents, signify the truly godly, who are effectually renewed by God's power, according to his purpose. The person that made no improvement, signifies unconverted sinners who do not sincerely love and honour God. The account taken of these servants at their Lord's return, and his different retributions to them, according to their past con- duct, are designed to teach us that the Lord Jesus will surely come at last to judgment, that we must all appear before his judgment-seat, to give an account of the deeds done in this life, and that our past behaviour here, both in heart and outward practice, will be the rule according to 15 170 TREATISE ON THE which the sentence of judgment will pass upon us. Though the reward of happiness to the godly will not be given them for their godliness, as the cause of it ; yet it will be given to them only, who have been thus qualified and fore-prepared by the Lord for it ; and that in different degrees, according to their different degrees of care, zeal, and diligence in the ways of God, after their conversion. On the other hand, all the ungodly shall be condemned to punishment according to the demerit of their works ; and to different degrees of punishment, according to their deserts. And thus, the works, the dispositions, and con- duct of men in this life, will be the rule according to which the final awards will be made at the last day to all man- kind, though not the meritorious or procuring cause of them to all, but only to the wicked. These things I take to be the very scope and design of the parable ; and so the universal men have no service at all to their cause from it. It is mere trifling to ask, as some do, if the ser- vant that was punished, had made as good use of his talent, as the rest did of theirs, would he not have been as well accepted ? That is, whether finally impenitent sinners would not have been accepted by Jesus Christ, as well as true believers, and sincerely godly persons, had they been true believers, and sincerely godly as well as they ? I am free enough to answer in the affirmative. Had they been such, it would have been a certain evidence that they had been elected to holiness and salvation, as well as the others ; for true justifying and sanctifying ftiith is not of ourselves, it is the gift of God, given according to his pur- DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 171 pose and grace, which was made sure to all believers in Christ Jesus, before the world began. But then the question does not at all touch the matter in debate, viz : whether un- renewed sinners have had a sufficient inward grace given them to be true believers and godly persons, as those who are really such. Considering that sinners' impotency con- sists chiefly in their enmity, their inability, in the opposi- tion of their Avills to God's will, I think it is plain that no grace is sufiicient, but that Avhicli is actually effectual. Their wills are not just in equilihrio, in an even balance between holiness and sin, as much inclined to the one side as the other, so as that they might bring their wills to a compliance with, and complacence in, the ways of God, by their own reason ; or by the help of some divine assistances, which they might also reject : but their wills are strongly set against the new covenant way of salvation, and the holy law of God, in its spiritual nature and extent ; and therefore, " no man can come unto Christ, except tho Father draw him." John vi. 44. Again, they argue in another method from the general calls, invitations, and offers of the gospel, reasoning after this manner. It would, say they, be the highest instance of dissembling and deceit for God to call sinners to repent and turn from their evil ways, with such appearance of real sincerity and earnestness, if he had before infallibly decreed that a great many of them should not repent and turn (not to communicate the grace of conversion and repentance to many, it should be). And what greater in- sincerity and illusion, say they, can well be imagined than 172 TREATISE ON THE for God to make such a general, unlimited offer of Christ, and salvation through him, as (Rev. xxii. 17), " Whoso- ever will, let him take the water of life freely ;" when he has already purposed not to give salvation to many ? How can such an open declaration agree with such a secret pur- pose ? Would there not be a direct opposition between his outward expressions and inward sentiments, which is downright falsifying and hypocrisy ? But all this plausible reasoning, on which some of the greatest patrons of the Arminian scheme bestow a great deal of eloquence, is grounded upon a mistaken apprehen- sion of the nature and true import of these calls and gos- pel offers. God's calls to sinners to repent and turn to him, to believe in Christ, &c., are only so many significa- tions of what is sinners' duty, and what is agreeable to God's holy nature, pleasing and approvable in his sight. The calls do not signify what is God's purpose concerning men, but what is their duty to him, and that he loves holi- ness in his creatures, that the righteous Lord loves right- eousness. And so, in all such calls and commands, there is an entire agreement between God's words and his will signified by them ; for he does, indeed, will these things, as the matter of sinners' duty, and loves them as agreeable to his own holy law. This just view of the many calls of God in the scripture to sinners, for their repentance and conversion to holiness, destroys all the force of the argu- ment taken from them, as though they were inconsistent with God's secret will and purpose to leave many in their sins without converting grace, for they import nothing in DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 173 their true design contrary to it. And when God conde- scends to use arguments and expostulations with sinners about what he requires, it is that he may deal with them as reasonable beings, and convert his elect in a way agree- able to their rational nature. As to the offers of Christ made to all where the gospel comes, and promises of salvation, through him, to all such as truly believe in him. It is most certain, that God does will and purpose to save all such as truly accept of his Son Jesus Christ, and believe in him, as he is proposed and set forth in the gospel revelation of him, for he declares that all such shall be saved. But then, we are to consider this faith in Christ as the gift of God, according to Eph. ii. 8, and a grace of his powerful operation or working, (Col. ii. 12, Eph. i. 19, 2 Thess. i. ll,j bestowed only upon, and wrought only in those whom he has chosen, and, there- fore, called the faith of God's elect, (Tit. i. 1.) And thus, the promises of the gospel run exactly parallel with the election of grace, and do not import anything contrary to it. Indeed, to say that God does not really design to save all who shall believe in Christ, notwithstanding he has declared that he will, were to impute the grossest falsehood and deceit to him ; but there is no such thino- in the doctrine which the argument is brought against. It is true, the offer of Christ as a Saviour is made to all, to be accepted and believed in, for their salvation in particular, wherever the news of the gospel-salvation is sent. But then, this offer does not signify or import that God designed him and the saving benefits of his death equally for all, 15* 174 TREATISE ON THE but that, inasmuch as all have equal need of him, and God has not revealed or any way pointed out who they are whom he has not chosen to salvation through him, so as they might be known either to themselves or others, it is the great duty of all to accept of him with all their hearts, according to the declarations concerning him in the gospel, freely and willingly to comply with the way of salvation through his atonement, casting a fiducial dependence upon him, and him only, for their eternal life ; for which faith the infallible promise of salvation to all such as so receive him, is sufficient warrant and encouragement. And it Avas necessary that the ofier should be thus universal, when it was not revealed who, in particular, was elected to salva- tion through him, that so the elect might be brought to believe in him, upon a rational ground and foundation ; for they could not know that they were chosen to life through him, more than any others, before their believing, and, therefore, could not have had a ground for faith to go upon, were it not for the promise to whosoever believes, and the declarations that it is every one's duty cordially to comply, and be pleased with that way of salvation, through an atoning Mediator ; and, upon the encouragement of this promise, to cast a reliance, and the whole dependence of their souls for salvation upon him. In this manner it is that the offers of Christ in the gospel are general and uni- versal, not importing that he died alike for all, or that he was equally designed for all, in the purpose of God ; but that, seeing none have any reason certainly to conclude against themselves that they were rejected in the divine DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 175 purpose ; and, seeing acceptance and eternal life, through Christ, is promised to all that believe, it is the duty of all, with their whole hearts, to embrace him as he is proposed, and believe in him ; and yet none will so believe in him but the chosen of God, who are called according to his pur- pose. And thus, as God is entirely consistent with him- self in the case, so are the ministers of the gospel consistent with themselves in maintaining God's absolute decrees, and yet making such general offers of Christ, as a Saviour, to all that hear them, calling upon them to accept of and believe in him, using arguments with them for that purpose, and promising life and salvation, in his name, to all that truly comply with the gospel and believe in him. And though they do not know the elect of God among their hearers, he does and will apply this gospel to their hearts, so as to bring them to believe in Christ, and become truly godly. These considerations, if duly weighed and attended to, I think may be abundantly satisfactory in this case. There is another argument, commonly insisted on by those on the other side of the question, taken from God's appointment of a gospel ministry, ordinances of worship, and means of grace in his church, as if they were altogether vain and useless, on supposition of such eternal decrees. According to the Calvinist doctrine of predesti- nation, say they, "It is quite needless for ministers to preach, and as needless for people to hear, or to perform any religious duty whatsoever ; and the reason is, because they cannot alter the purpose of God concerning them, whatever it be, do they well or ill ; they will fare as well, 176 TREATISE ON THE let them live as they list, as if they did ever so well ; and so they had even as good take their swing : nay, it had been much better for all the reprobate, that they had never had the privileges of the gospel ; because, according to the scripture, the condemnation and misery of those that perish, will be much aggravated by it." This is an awful charge, indeed ; and if it be just, the doctrine is certainly most unsufferable, which takes off all restraints from the most profligate course of life, farther than what proceed from our temporal interest in this world ; and arguments from private temporal interest do often sway more to the most inhuman crimes than moral honesty. But I hope to make it appear that the objection is most false and groundless. And to this purpose let these few things be considered : First, Supposing there were no arguments for a pious, godly life, to be had from our own eternal interest ; yet there are reasons of another nature, of sufficient weight and force in themselves, to induce us to it, and engage us to endeavour after it. Is not the great God, who is infinitely good and glorious, worthy of the greatest esteem, profoundest subjection, and highest adoration of all the rational creation ? And has he not an inviolable right and claim to these things from us, as our Creator and Pre- server ? And is not conformity to God, and to obey and honour him, the greatest honour and glory of a created being ? These arguments, I know, have little weight with apostate creatures whose understandings are darkened, and all their other faculties wholly corrupted ; but that is not DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 177 for want of sufficient weight in their own nature : nothing can ever dissolve God's title to the homage and obedience of his creatures. Secondly, I would have two or three particulars considered and weighed together : First, that the elect are elected to salvation, "through the sanctification of the Spirit;" " whom he did predestinate, them he also called." And this effectual calling, and sanctifying grace, wrought in the heart by the Holy Spirit, is the certain fruit and evidence of eternal election ; whereby those who are the partakers of this grace, may, and frequently do, come to a comfort- able satisfaction, as to their election of God. Again, you are to observe, that the elect themselves, before their conversion and effectual calling, have no notices or evidences at all of their being elected, more than others ; which must needs be a very uneasy and distres- sing condition, when the Spirit of God touches the conscience. And then, in the next place, let it be con- sidered, that God has appointed the preaching of the gos- pel, and other religious exercises, such as reading the holy scriptures, and other good books, prayer, &c., to be the means whereby he ordinarily converts and sanctifies his elect, and affords them the comfortable tokens of his electing love. He has appointed these ordinances and means as the ordinary channels wherein to communicate his special grace to those whom he has chosen. Now if these things be duly adverted to, I think, it will be clear, that there is use, and great use too, for the preaching of the gospel, and other exercises of religion, in a consistency 178 TREATISE ON THE with God's absolute decrees : and that there are sufficient reasons to engage persons to a very careful observance of them, and of all the commands of God ; for the ordinances of God are the means which he sees fit, in his wisdom, to make use of for the conversion and sanctification of his elect, which work of grace is the only evidence of our belonging to God, as his elect people : and therefore one can hardly think that any but such as are stupidly un- concerned about their soul's everlasting states, could reason in earnest in the strain of the objection I am now upon. Surely, one that is any way duly thoughtful about a matter of such vast moment as his eternal well-being, would readily think with himself to this purpose ; " Oh ! what would I not give to have some comfortable, dis- tinguishing evidences of being chosen of God, and ap- pointed to life ; well, his ways and ordinances are the means he uses for this purpose ; the channels in which he is wont to communicate his special grace to those he designs to save. I must wait upon and look to him in that way of hope, and keep at the pool where he uses to come and heal diseased souls ; it may be he will some time meet with me, in his own way, which he has appointed for visiting his chosen, and fulfil in me all the good pleasure of his goodness, and the work of faith with power, and cause me to rejoice in his love. These ways of religion are not only the ways in which alone there is reasonable ground of hope to meet with such blessings, but they are the commands and institutions of God, recommended with his awful authority; and therefore, to disregard and DOCTRINE OF PREDE.STI NATION. 179 neglect them, will be to disobey and contemn God still more, and also will expose me to a more awful punishment." Consider now, if this be not a just and right way of reasoning in the case : nay, I am convinced that the Cal- vinist doctrine, rightly understood, and really believed, will make people much more careful, serious, and diligent observers of the ways of God, than the contrary doctrine will ; for it tends much more to bring them to a solemn, solicitous concern of heart about their eternal state, and consequently to make them more earnest in all the most hopeful, probable ways of meeting with satisfaction about it. Thirdly, Though it be true, that such as are rejected in the purpose of God will never be converted in the use of all the means of grace, yet, seeing they do not know the secret purpose of God concerning them, but have the same reason to entertain hopes that they may be chosen to life that any other unconverted persons have, it would be a high and provoking contempt of God for them to neglect the ordinances which he has appointed as means for the communicating special grace and sweet consolation to his elect, and which he, therefore, by his sovereign au- thority, requires all who have the opportunity, to attend upon ; and they shall find it, if guilty of it, brought into the account against them at the great day, when every man shall be judged according to his works, and they shall receive, proportionally, the greater punishment. Fourthly y As to the elect converted, their hearts are so renewed, as to love God above all, and to make obedience to his will their hearty choice. Believing in Jesus Christ, 180 TREATISE ON THE his love is shed abroad in their hearts, and sweetly con- strains them to serve and honour him to whom they are under such endearing engagements. The consideration of God's having elected them to eternal glory, when he might justly have rejected them as well as others ; the hope and prospect of that eternal glory with him, and the considera- tion of his having sent his Son to answer the law for them, and suffer in their room, that they might be delivered from deserved misery and made happy in the enjoyment of him- self for ever ; their apprehensions of his glory and excel- lency in himself, and his right in and over them as his creatures ; all these things are powerful arguments with them to love and praise God ; it is their desire and delight to glorify and honour him. Moreover, the Lord Jesus takes them for his peculiar charge ; it is a part of his office as mediator, to bring them safe to glory through all dangers ; accordingly, his Holy Spirit dwells in them as a sanctifier and comforter ; thus they are engaged to God in the w{\,y of holiness by the most inviolable cords and loving bands; so that the doctrine of absolute election is far from destroying holiness of life ; it is a strong excite- ment to it, in all the renewed children of God, who love him when they are enabled to see the hopeful evidences of their own election. And, therefore, such as say (as some, no less wickedly than foolishly, do) that, " if they were persuaded of the truth of the doctrine of predestination, they would never be at any pains or care to serve God more," had just as good say plainly, they have no love to God, and that they are entire strangers to the nature of true goodness. DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 181 Fifthly, Consider the method of reasoning in the objec- tion is such as you would not allow to be just in other cases of the like nature. Can you think it would have been just reasoning in kind Hezekiah to say, that becaue the Lord had ordained he should live fifteen years longer, (2 Kings XX. 6,) he had no more need of either food or physic ? The prophet Isaiah was of another mind, when he ordered a lump of figs to be laid to the boil, (ver. 7.) This shows us that God brings about his purposes in the use of suitable means, and that it is therefore necessary for us to observe them. Was ever anything more absolutely and positively fixed in the purpose of God than the time and manner of Christ's death? (John vii. 30, and viii. 59, Luke iv. 29, 30, John xi. 53, 54.) Was Paul so incon- sistent with himself when, though God had told him that both he and all that were in the ship with him should be saved through all the hazards of the voyage, yet, when the shipmen were about to go ofi" in a boat and leave the rest in the distress, he said to them, "Except these abide in the ship, ye cannot be saved ?" Acts xxvii. In a like manner, it may be as truly and reasonably said, that except the elect be converted and sanctified, they cannot be saved from hell, because of the certain connection God has made between the means and the end. And none have any reason to expect converting grace while they profanely neglect the means of grace. As to the latter clause of the objection, that the non- elect who have had the opportunity of the gospel will be more miserable than if they had not, I answer, it is very 16 182 TREATISE ON THE likelj it will be so with the most of them. But then, I think if they improved the gospel as they might do, though they would not be converted and saved by it, yet they would not be the more, but, perhaps, the less miserable for it. If it be inquired, for what end the gospel is sent to such as God has not proposed to save, I answer, it is chiefly for the elect's sake that are among them, that thereby they may be brought in to Christ, and prepared for the heavenly glory. I shall now conclude the answer to the whole objection, with a general remark or two. Seeing the doctrine in itself does not take away our obligations to a religious life, but affords sufficient motives and arguments for it, then it is no argument against the truth of the doctrine, though some ungodly men should abuse it to liberty to sin. Other doctrines of the gospel are liable to the same abuse as well as this. Thus, Paul observes, that some might be ready to infer from the gospel doctrine of justification, as he laid it down, that they might continue in sin that grace might abound (Rom. vi. 1); that some would be ready to object against him, that he made Christ the minister of sin, i. e., one that gave liberty and encouragement to sin (Gal. ii. 17); and that some did actually affirm that he said, " Let us do evil that good may come," (Rom. iii. 8.) Again, the Lord Jesus who came to destroy the works of the devil, and purchase to himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works, will have his end, though some men of cor- rupt minds should abuse his truth, to the awful aggravation of their guilt in the day of his appearing. And I think DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 183 "we have little encouragement to go to the Arminian scheme for the advancement of true practical religion, if we consider what advancement this way it has produced since it came in fashion. What is farther brought as an objection by some, I think, is hardly worth taking notice of, viz : that some will be apt to take occasion, from the doctrine of predestina- tion, to live in a slothful negligence and security, from a presumption that they are elected, and so cannot miss of salvation : and others will be apt to fall into despair, from a fearful apprehension that they are not elected. As I hinted already, we are to distinguish between the abuse unreasonably made of a doctrine, and its natural tendency in itself. And what is there in this doctrine that leads to either of these wide extremes ? How can it lead any to a groundless presumption and slothful negligence, when, according to it, none have reason to persuade themselves they are elected, until they are renewed and sanctified. And then they cannot be careless about the honour and obedience due to God ? " How shall they that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?" Rom. vi. 2. All the gos- pel arguments to a life of holiness, and this, of their election, among the rest, do then effectually engage their hearts to it. Indeed, if they knew their election before their conversion, before they believed in Christ and loved God, no doubt they would abuse it to sloth and licentious- ness, till God changed their hearts : but they have no sure evidence of their election till they are brought to a better disposition. And how can it bring any to desperation, 184 TREATISE ON THE when they cannot know that they are not elected ? For persons to conclude positively that they are appointed to destruction, is to conclude without reason, and a pretend- ing to know the unrevealed secrets of God's breast. Some think the words of the Lord Jesus, (Luke xix. 42,) are contrary to this doctrine ; where he says of Jeru- salem, " If thou hadst known, in this thy day, the things that belong to thy peace ! but now they are hid from thine eyes." Which words, they suppose, import that the inhabi- tants of that city had, before that time, had such inward assistance from God, as put it in their power to convert themselves ; but which were then for ever withdrawn from them, for their abuse of them, so that their case was then beyond all hope. And in this same sense they suppose that all men have a day of grace, in some part of their life ; or, as they rather choose to term it, a day of visitation. But this opinion is without any foundation in the text. How can the words signify that their day there spoken of, was a time in which they had sufficient inward grace, when they clearly imply that they did not so much as know the thincfs that belonored to their peace in that day ? The true import of our Lord's words is, that they had had, in that day of his public ministry among them, sufficient outward means of conviction that he was the true Messiah ; sufficient to prevail with them, as rational creatures, to acknoAvledge and own him as such; notwithstanding of which they rejected and persecuted him and would in a little time put him to death ; for which they should before long be punished with utter ruin, both DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. 185 of their city and nation, as it follows in the next words. And so the words also signify, that there was less probability and reasonable hope of their being converted to God, after all such means had been so long quite lost upon them, than there was before, according to God's ordinary way of working. And now I have gone through all the contrary argu- ments and objections of any consequence that I know of, and, upon the whole, must desire the careful reader seriously to look back and consider if the doctrine of absolute pre- destination, as it has been stated and represented, be not entirely agreeable to reason, clearly founded on scripture, and perfectly consistent with every part of it, and, conse- quently, a most certain truth of God. Let us not be wil- fully resolved against admitting reasonable evidence, but quit ourselves like men, and use our understanding, with humble application to God, on whom all creatures are dependent, for a right judgment and a sound mind. Do not say you will not believe it, just because you do not like it. That is both the shame and crime of a reasonable being, and the greatest folly in the world ; for if it be a truth, it will be so, whether you like it and believe it or not. And let us also consider what is the proper use and native tendency of the ^doctrine. And so, let us humbly lie low, as guilty criminals, before the foot-stool of God's sovereignty, acknowledging his right to dispose of us, for life or death, as he pleases. Let us not be stupidly easy in our minds, without the experience of supernatural, sanc- tifying grace in our hearts, the only evidence of our 16* 186 DOCTRINE OF PREDESTINATION. election and means of solid comfort, " without -whicli no man shall see the Lord." Let us seek and long for it in all the ways of God's commands and ordinances, where it is most likely to be found, and not treasure up greater loads of wrath to ourselves against the day of wrath, by disobedience to the great Lawgiver's authority. Let such of us as God has given the tokens of his special love unto, in our sanctification, give the glory and praise to him alone, and still endeavour to live answerable to the obli- gations of such wonderful, distinguishing love and grace. Let us give up all confidence in our own ability, and depen- dence on our own righteousness and good doings to entitle us to happiness, casting ourselves only on the mediation and atonement of the Son of God as he is revealed and proposed in the gospel, seeking for that living faith in him that brings joy and peace to the soul, that works by love and the freest obedience. Such as these are the things which this doctrine naturally leads to ; and so it agrees to the great design of God in the new covenant, the illustration of the greatest glory of his free grace in the salvation of guilty sinners ; whereas, the contrary scheme defaces and sinks it down. But God will have the glory, and it is fit he should : the whole glory, from first to last, he has secured to himself. As he laid the foundation of sinners' salvation in pure, free, and rich grace, so, at the last day, he will bring forth the head- stone thereof with shouting, crying Grace, Grace unto it, (Zech. iv. 7.) JOHN BLAIR, The Ret. John Blair was a younger brother of the Rev. Samuel Blair. He was an alumnus of the Log College, and as a theolo- gian, was not inferior to any man in the Presbyterian church, in his day. He was first settled in Pennsylvania, at Big Spring, (now Newville,) in the Cumberland valley, in the vicinity of Carlisle ; but by reason of the hostile incursions of the Indians, his people were obliged to leave their rude habitations on the frontier, and to retreat into the more densely populated part of the colony. Mr. Blair, it would seem, never returned to the place whence he had been driven by the invasion of the savages, but upon the decease of his brother Samuel, he received and accepted a call to be his successor at Fagg's Manor, and that not only as pastor of the church, but also as teacher of the school which his brother had instituted in that place. In this important station he continued for nine years, and though not equal to his brother as an impressive preacher, as a scholar and as a theologian he was not inferior. After the death of Dr. Finley, Mr. Blair was elected professor of theology, in the College of New Jersey, which appointment he ac- cepted, and was at the same time elected vice-president, and until the arrival of Dr. Witherspoon, performed all the duties of president. The funds of the college not being adequate to support a professor of theology, distinct from the president ; and it being known that Dr. Witherspoon was an orthodox and eminent theologian, who could consistently with his other duties teach theology, Mr. Blair judged it would be expedient for him to resign. Upon this, he re- (187) 188 JOHN BLAIR. ceived a call to settle as pastor of a Presbyterian congregation in Wallkill, Orange Co., New York. Here he continued to labour in the duties of the ministry, until he was called away from the field by death, which occurred Dec. 8, 1771, when he was not more than fifty-one or fifty two years of age. " John Blair was a judicious and persuasive preacher, and through his exertions, sinners were converted and the children of God edified. Fully convinced of the truth of the doctrine of grace, he addressed immortal souls with that warmth and power, which left a witness in every bosom. Though he sometimes wrote his sermons in full, yet his common mode of preaching, was by short notes, comprising the general outlines. His labours were too abundant to admit of more, and no more was necessary to a mind so richly stored with the great truths of religion. For his large family he amassed no fortune, but he left them what was infinitely better, a religious education, a holy example, and prayers which have been remarkably answered His disposition was uncommonly patient, placid, benevolent, disinterested and cheerful. He was too mild to indulge bitterness or severity, and he thought that the truth required little else but to be fairly stated and properly understood. Those who could not relish the savour of his piety, loved him as an amiable, and revered him as a great man. Though no bigot, he firmly believed that the Presbyterian form of government is most scriptural, and the most favourable to religion and happiness. " In his last sickness, he imparted his advice to the congregation, and represented to his family the necessity of an interest in Christ. A few nights before he died, he said, 'Directly, I am going to glory 1 My Master calls me, I must be gone.' " OBSERVATIONS ON REGENERATION. BY THE EEV. JOHN BLAIK. As no truth is more interesting and important, so none has been more frequently and fully treated in a practical view, by pious writers, than the doctrine of regeneration. Many have, in this way, very excellently and largely described the happy change, which, by virtue of the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit, takes place in the whole man. I have therefore no design at present to enter upon a full consideration of the subject, but shall only beg leave to make a few very brief observations ; some of which have not been so particularly considered in prac- tical treatises, but yet perhaps, may- be of some use to assist in the right apprehension of, and tend to prevent mistakes about a doctrine, which lies so much at the found- ation of all true religion. Observation 1. Regeneration is the communication of a principle of spiritual life to the soul of a sinner, naturally dead in trespasses and sins, by the agency of the Holy Spirit. I call it a principle, not only because it is a beginning of spiritual life, but especially, because it denotes a settled (189) 190 OBSERVATIONS ON REGENERATION. determination of the mind, to right activity towards spiritual objects, under a moral consideration of them, whence results every right exercise of heart about divine things. It is the determination of the soul to a holy activity about God and divine things, or to such a kind of action, not from the impulsion of an external force, but an internal active principle, and therefore is justly called life — life of the most excellent kind. It is the life of life.* But as our apostasy from God has fixed in us, by nature, a very contrary determination, to a course of sinful action, therefore, while that continues (which will be till some power subdues it), there can be no tendency in the soul to an holy temper. The power of the soul to any activity lies formally in the will. Hence its whole power, by nature, is to sin, and to reject God. For "the carnal mind is enmity against God." Rom. viii. 7. Consequently some other power must be exerted in order to break this evil determination, and reduce the rebellious creature to a * There is some distinction bet-ween a natural and a moral principle of action; the former lies in the very essence of the being to which it belongs, or is a determination to some particular kind of action resulting from its frame or constitution. Thus, self-actiArity, or natural life, -which is essential to the soul, is a principle of action in general. A determina- tion to particular kinds of natural action, such as -we call instinct in brutes, or reason in man, arises immediately from the existence of natural faculties, or something in the frame or constitution of creatures respec- tively. But a moral priaciple is a determination to some particular kind of action, arising from some settled judgment or sentiment, in -which the ■will acquiesces. Thus a principle of holy action is the fixed impression of some spiiitual truth or truths upon the heart. OBSERVATIONS ON REGENERATION. 191 right temper. And that must be a power that has dominion over the will. This new determination, there- fore, is from the almighty agency of the Holy Spirit ; it is he that communicates this new principle of life. Ac- cordingly, it is everywhere ascribed to him in scripture. (John iii. 3 — 5, John vi. 63, Tit. iii. 5). Observation 2. This principle of spiritual hfe and the manner of its communication are not immediately in them- selves perceptible. As Adam did not perceive when God breathed into his nostrils the breath of natural life, but perceived its existence and nature from its activity and effects, so the existence and nature of spiritual life are known only by the experience the Christian has of its exercise and efficacy. In this view our Lord observes, " The wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh nor whither it goeth ; so is every one that is born of the Spirit." John iii. 8. There are, indeed, those who greatly abuse this passage, thence flattering themselves that they may be the subjects of regeneration, without perceiving any great change in their hearts and lives. But this is not only foreign to the sense of the place, but contradictory to it, for the wind is very sensibly per- ceived. The design of our Lord seems to be to remove the surprise of Nicodemus at the mysteriousness of the doctrine, by showing him it is a supernatural work per- formed by the Holy Spirit, as a gracious Sovereign, to which the sinner himself is so far from contributing any- thing, that he is not so much as sensible of the article of 192 OBSERVATIONS ON REGENERATION. communication, nor perceives the manner of the Holy Spirit's operation ; q. d. there are mysteries in nature which you cannot account for. You cannot immediately perceive the origin of the wind, nor account for its ceasing when once in motion, or perceive the reason why it con- tinually, and often very suddenly, changes its direction. You hear the sound and feel the effects, but it is only by observations on these sensations, either made by yourself, or suggested by others, that you can infer any conclusions about its nature or causes. Why then should you be sur- prised to find mysteries in the manner of divine operations, when performing works of grace ? In this new birth, a man can only perceive the exercises of divine life in his heart, and by scriptural observations on these, infer what sort of life he lives, or form conclusions about its nature and principle. For any one, therefore, to pretend to tell what the principle of divine life is, antecedent to all exercises of life in the heart, and undertake from thence to demonstrate and explain those exercises, is a vain attempt. When he distinguishes this life from all its exercises, and goes about to tell us what it is antecedent to them all, he must talk in the dark about a certain something, of whicb- he has no idea. To give it a name, to call it, for instance, a new temper or taste, is not to tell us what it is. Let any man explain what he means by a new or holy temper, Avith- out including some exercises of life in heart, if he can. Observation 3. Regeneration and conversion, strictly taken, are not distinct things ; but these different denomi- nations express the same thing under different views. I OBSERVATIONS ON REGENERATION. 193 say conversion strictly taken ; for largely taken, it includes the first exercises of the several graces of the Holy Spirit which are but the various modifications of the same principle of spiritual life, such as a justifying faith, hope, joy, zeal, eorroAV for sin, &c. From which, regeneration (though the term is often also used in the same latitude, yet) is so dis- tinct in a strict sense, as to be altogether antecedent, not only in the order of nature, but of time too. But strictly taken, conversion is the actual submission or turning of a soul to God in the most simple motion of it. This may be, perhaps, in the soul's submitting itself into the hands of divine sovereignty, as most fitly having a right to do with him as he pleases, or in a supreme regard to God as a most glorious Being and rightful Lord. Now this, when considered as the effect of the Holy Spirit's agency, enabling or causing the soul to turn to God, is called regeneration ; but when considered as an activity essential to spiritual life, and formally as the soul's act, is called conversion ; but these are only difi"erent views and respects of the same thing. For regeneration undoubtedly denotes a moral effect produced by the Spirit of God. But this effect which he produced, is the soul's tui-ning to God. Surely, nothing short of this can be called the new birth. Regeneration is the implantation of holiness in the heart. Now, certainly, there can be no real holiness without turn- ing to God ; the soul that has not turned to God is still, without controversy, unregenerate. Hence it follows Observtion 4. That this principle wrought in the soul in regeneration is not something antecedent to every act 17 194 OBSERVATIONS ON REGENERATION". and exercise of holiness, but includes in it, or is a first act or exercise of holiness, of the same nature with all the exercises of holiness that follow after throucrh the course of life. To cause life, is to cause action ; for activity is essential to the idea of life. When the Holy Spirit regenerates a sinner, he communicates an active principle, otherwise it were not life. But to talk of an active prnciple existing in the soul absolutely without action, would be a contra- diction; now this action must be cleaving to God. Hence arises, Observation 5. Viz : that this principle of spiritual life consists in, or includes some new view of the mind, and determination or approbation of the will. This must be the case, because it is a moral principle ; otherwise it would not be the principle of a course of moral action. When therefore a principle of spiritual life is implanted, a moral effect is produced ; but that effect which includes no acts of the understanding and will, but is absolutely antecedent to them, must be a mere physical, and not a moral effect, and then to regenerate would be to create in a physical, not a moral sense. I think the sacred scriptures set the matter in the same light with the above observations. Sometimes this happy change is expressed by the term '■'■light.'' "Ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord." Eph. V. 8. Sometimes it is represented under the notion of being made willing. "Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power." Ps. ex. 3. Either of these ex- OBSEKVATIONS ON REGENERATION. 195 pressions includes the other Thus when the regenerate are called light, the matter is not confined to the under- standing only, but includes the approbation of the will, and to be willing, certainly includes the view of the understanding ; for there can be no act of the will without it ; sometimes both are set in view together, as : " To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to God." Acts xxvi. 18. Certain- ly to open the eyes and turn from darkness to light is to enlighten the understanding ; and to turn to God is the act of the will. To the same purpose is, " For God hath shined into our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ." 2 Cor. iv. 6. To see the glory of God must include both the view of the understanding, and the approbation of the will. It is no objection to this, to say, these scriptures speak of this change largely taken. For admitting that, yet it is not by way of contradistinction from, or exclusive of, the first instance ; but the first existence of life comes under the same predicament. Thus they, who were some- times darkness, are not said to be enlightened only, but to be light. God, in the new creation, shines into the heart, in a manner analogous to his shining in the natural world, when he created light in it. It is very easy to say, that in regeneration, a holy temper is produced whence this know- ledge and volition arises ; but perhaps it would not be so easy to tell, in that connection, what we are to understand by that temper. Surely we are not to conceive of a moral, in the same manner as of a natural temper. In the latter, 196 OBSERVATIONS ON REGENERATION. we take into the consideration such a certain, yet various construction of the human frame, as is apt to produce such and such passions, and feelings of nature. Now if we have any idea of the former, any thing like this, we must then consider it only as a new faculty created in the soul, which has nothing moral in it, any more than the under- standing or will considered as natural faculties. But if we conceive of it as a moral determination of the soul towards God, then we must consider it as including some apprehension of God in the understanding, and an act of the will embracing him, which brings the matter to what I have said. Thus, we are, as it were, insensibly led to some apprehension of what this divine principle is, or wherein it consists, though we cannot comprehend the manner of the Holy Spirit's operation in producing it, or explain how it exists. It is an experimental, practical knowledge of God, or it is a new view of the infinite per- fections of God, with the approbation of them in the will as most excellent ; or, which is indeed the same thing under its proper denomination, it is a supreme love to God. Supreme love to God is the very essence of true religion ; hence it is called "the fulfilling of the law." Rom. xiii. 10. Our Lord mentions love to God and our neighbour, as the sum and substance of the whole law. Matt. xxii. 37 — 40. No action can be called true obedience, if it do not flow from love to God, and every exercise of true grace may be reduced to this as its principle. Observation 6. The Holy Spirit makes use of the word of God as a means in the work of regeneration, which OBSERVATIONS ON REGENERATION. 197 he renders irresistibly efficacious for that purpose. I am far from thinking with the Arminians, that the only influence of the Holy Spirit in this matter lies in what they call moral suasion ; that is, as I understand it, the Holy Spirit having set before us the arguments and motives of the gospel in the word, both by his providence and an influence upon the mind, excites its attention to these things, and assists the natural faculties in wei<2;hin