LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS UNIVERSITY SERIES The Sesamoid Articular A Bone in the Mandible of Fishes BY EDWIN CHAPIN STARKS Assistant Professor of Zoology WITH FIFTEEN TEXT FIGURES tt*/ \\1 * > [Issued March 31, 1916] STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY IQl6 STANFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS THE SESAMOID ARTICULAR: A BONE IN THE MANDIBLE OF FISHES CONTENTS INTRODUCTION SYNONYMY THE ADDUCTOR MANDIBULAE MUSCLES THE SESAMOID ARTICULAR SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The sesamoid articular is a small bone on the inner surface of the articular of fishes giving attachment to a stout tendon from the adductor mandibulae muscles. This investigation was undertaken to ascertain in what groups of fishes it might occur; what its variation and condition might be in dif- ferent groups ; and to give the early history of the literature, which recent authors seem to be ignorant of. Originally it was intended to work on the homologies of the adductor mandibulae muscles in order better to establish the identity of the sesa- moid articular and its tendon ; but after considerable work (done mostly at the Zoological Station at Naples in January and February of 1915), it appeared that the muscles are so variable in size, position, and relationship to each other that the sesamoid articular and its tendon were more valu- able in identifying the muscle than the reverse. A few of the drawings and brief descriptions of the muscles are here presented, and show their diversity of form and position. Many other fishes were worked on, but to report on all of them does not appear to be of advantage to the present inquiry. The first notice of the sesamoid articular occurs in Cuvier and Valencienne's Histoire Naturelle des Poissons. Cuvier found it in the perch, and published such a picture of it that there can be no question as 4 THE SESAMOID ARTICULAR to its identity. He called it the Operculaire (number 37 of his picture), homologizing it with a bone in the jaw of reptiles that he called by the same name, supposing the reptile bone homologous with the true opercle bone of fishes, though in the fish he also uses this name (number 28) for the bone commonly so called. In 1846 Owen, in his Lectures on Comparative Anatomy and Physi- ology of the Vertebrates, published a picture of the mandible of the Sudis, Arapiama gigas, with the following remarks: "The great Sudis and the Polypterus have the splint-like plate along the inner surface of the ramus, answering to that which Camper and Cuvier have unfortunately called 'operculaire' in the mandible of reptiles, but to which I have given the name of 'splenial' to prevent the confusion from the synonymy with the true opercular bone of fishes." Later in his Comparative Anatomy Owen included Amiatus with the other two forms, and adds : the splenial "supports teeth and develops a coronoid process." It thus appears that Owen's splenial is the bone that usually bears that name in the Ganoids. It need scarcely be added that no homology exists between the splenial, which is clearly a dental cement bone, and the sesamoid articular (Cuvier's Operculaire). Giinther, in his Introduction to the Study of Fishes (p. 91), makes a similar mistake when he refers to the os operculare as a synonym of the splenial as follows. "The splenial or os operculare, which is situated on the inside of the articulary." Ridewood (Linn. Soc. Jour., XXIX, p. 267), in writing of the mandible of the Sudis, says: "Although the bony lamina that bears the teeth occupies the position of the splenial bone, it is not a distinct plate of bone as might be concluded from the remark of Owen." There can be little question but that Owen referred to this inseparable toothed plate, rather than to a sesamoid articular. Dr. Ridewood reports the sesamoid articular not present. Owen, in a table of synonyms that he published in his Lectures, includes the name subvomeral of Geoffrey St. Hilaire. I fail to find the term in the paper Owen cites (Ann. des. Sci. Nat., Ill, 1824), and there- fore can not be sure whether it is the homolog of the sesamoid articular or of the splenial; but if of the former it is an earlier account of the bone than the one given by Cuvier. Agassiz also uses the term Operculaire for the splenial of Polypterus and Lepisosteus (Poissons Fossiles, vol. 2, part 2, pp. 20 and 42, pi. B and C, 1843), but in the Sudis (Piscium Brasiliensium, pi. B, 1829) he applies operculaire to an entirely different bone, that Owen in the same INTRODUCTION 5 form called the surangular — confusing it with the surangular of Ganoids — and that Ridewood says, is "merely the endosteal articular displaced." Erdl, in his work on Gymnarchus, labeled the sesamoid articular, in both German and Latin, the kronenforsatz des Unterkiefers, pars coro- noidea mandibulae. He thus, doubtless, as Cope did later, considered it the homolog of the coronoid of reptiles. Bridge in 1877 described the bone in Amiatus that I have herein homologized as the sesamoid articular. He termed it simply ossicle C, but since that time every anatomist who has worked on Amiatus has referred to it as "ossicle C of Bridge." The last author to write of this bone was Ridewood (Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1904, p. 72), whom I follow in the use of the term 'sesamoid articular' as the best suggested for it. It is the Anglicized form of Vetter's Sesamoidverknocherung. He gives a history of the literature of the bone since the time of Cope, which I need not here repeat. Among the papers touched upon he gives undeserved prominence to a hastily prepared foot-note published by me in 1899 (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XXII), in which I listed various unrelated forms that possessed a sesa- moid articular. My material was such prepared skeletons as happened to be at hand, and the note was published purely with the object of showing the worthlessness of the bone in taxonomy as used by Cope. As my discussion was based on Cope's paper I followed him in the use of the term 'coronoid bone' without thought of homology. Most of the examples I reported upon were adult; and because the bone happened to be missing in a young individual of Mugil, the question was brought up as to whether it was not the ossified end of the tendon, that is always attached to it, developed with age. This seemed more probable at that time, as I was investigating the skeleton of Dallia in which the posttemporal ligament ossifies rather late in life. In the young Mugil referred to the bone was doubtless lost in preparing the skeleton, for I find it well developed in much smaller individuals that those re- ported upon. It has seemed most convenient for the needs of this paper to follow no scheme of grouping. The captions are not at all coordinate in value, nor are they consistent in terminology. For instance, the small orders of Ganoids together with the lung fishes are under one caption. "The eels" includes two orders; "the clupeoid fishes" is of superfamily rank; and the spiny-rayed fishes are grouped under such comprehensive cap- tions as "the blennies" or "the mailed-cheeked fishes," or even under family names. 6 THE SESAMOID ARTICULAR Where the term 'endosteal' or 'ectosteal part of the articular' is used it does not mean that these elements are necessarily separate. Nearly always the anterior end of the endosteal part remains distinct from the ectosteal part, though no trace of suture may remain. The endosteal part forms the surface for the articulation of the quadrate, and usually projects forward in a process, which I have herein referred to as the endosteal process. The process abruptly becomes Meckel's cartilage (or more correctly Meckel's cartilage abruptly ossifies to form the endo- steal process). Often the anterior part of the endosteal process is of the same size and shape as Meckel's cartilage, and the line of demarca- tion between the two is difficult to appreciate, by sight alone, until the latter begins to dry. The ectosteal part of the articular, usually herein called the ectosteal plate, lies outward from the endosteal part and forms the greater part of the bone. It is the continuation of the part articu- lating with the dentary, sheltering Meckel's cartilage on the outer surface. I may here point out the danger of reporting on the absence of the sesamoid articular in material that the investigator has not prepared for himself, for it is often so loosely attached to the other elements of the mandible, and so firmly to the tendon, that in cleaning the bones it is easily removed with the latter. For instance, I found it in all of the Clupeoid forms that I examined, though in several of them it has been reported absent. It was the original intention to investigate the development of the bone; but from lack of good material it appears better to publish the paper in its present form, reserving the development for the indefinite future when, it is hoped, material shall have accumulated to illustrate the various phases of it. SYNONYMY Operculaire Cuvier (C. & V. Hist. Nat. Pois., 1827). Kronenforsatz des Unterkiefers, pars coronoidea mandibulae Erdl (Abhand. Bayer Akad. Wiss., V— I, 1847). Ossicle C. Bridge (Jour. Anat. Phys., XI, part 4, 1877). Sesamoidverknocherung Vetter (Jena Zeitschr., XII, 1878). Coronoid Cope (Proc. Am. Phil. Soc., XVII, 1878). Addentary Gill (Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., XVIII, 1895). Sesamoid articular Ridewood (Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1909). THE ADDUCTOR MANDIBULAE MUSCLES Scorpaena scrofa. This short description and drawing is presented only to include a common type. Dr. Allis, in his Cranial Anatomy of the Mail-Cheeked Fishes (Zoologica Stuttgart, H, 57, 1909), has given a very complete, and much better description. A 2+3 Fig. i. — SCORPAENA SCROFA A 1-2-3, muscles of Vetter ; Lap, levator arcus palatini ; max, maxillary ; T, tendon. The superior part of the adductor mandibulae consists of two parts : ( i ) A dorsal muscle originating on the preopercle and running forward to a broad tendinous band along its entire front, which at its upper end forms a tendon to the maxillary, and at its lower joins the tendons of the ventral muscle to the mandible. (2) A ventral muscle originating on the preopercle (and on other bones anterior to it), and covered on its upper part by the dorsal muscle. Anteriorly it is inserted on three tendons running to the mandible ; the middle one of which is the sesamoid articu- lar tendon. This muscle represents A-2+ 3 of Vetter.* According to *Vetter. Janaische Zeitschr., XII, 1878. 8 THE SESAMOID ARTICULAR Dr. Allis that part of it that posteriorly runs internal to the levator arcus palatini may represent A-3 and the part external to it A-2. Dentex vulgaris. The superior part of the adductor mandibulae muscle consists of two parts : ( i ) A dorsal muscle which at first sight appears to be made up of two muscles — an outer and an inner one. The outer part is strongly attached to the maxillary at one end by a short stout tendon, and to the preopercular ridge at the other end by a longer, but scarcely less stout, tendon. Above the preopercular tendon projects the inner part. It originates on the preopercle and runs downward and forward obliquely behind the outer part, and is attached anteriorly to the lower edge of the outer part, and to a thick sheet of tendon that covers the greater part L