AGE AND SIZE COMPOSITION OF THE MENHADEN CATCH ALONG THE ATLANTIC COAST OF THE UNITED STATES, 1957 WITH A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE COMMERCIAL FISHERY SPECIAL SCIENTIFIC REPORT-FISHERIES Na 373 UNITED STATES DERAj^WNT^MTHMNTE^ FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE United States Department of the Interior, Fred A. Seaton, Secretary Fish and Wildlife Service, Arnie J. Suonnela, Commissioner Bureau of Connmercial Fisheries, Donald L. McKernan, Director AGE AND SIZE COMPOSITION OF THE MENHADEN CATCH ALONG THE ATLANTIC COAST OF THE UNITED STATES, 1957 WITH A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE COMMERCIAL FISHERY by Fred C . June United States Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report--Fisheries No. 373 Washington, D, C, January 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Int r oduc ti on '■ The 1957 purse-seine fishery 2 South Atlantic Area 4 Chesapeake Bay Area 4 Middle Atlantic Area 5 North Atlantic Area 5 North Carolina fall fishery 6 Distribution of fishing effort ^ Sampling of the catch ' Age c ompos iti on ° Length composition ^^ Weight c ompos iti on '■^ Average length and weight ^5 Discussion ^' Summary ^" Literature cited 20 Appendix ^^ FIGURES Frontispiece: "Power blocks" in operation during menhaden purse -seine fishing. Part of the net is hauled aboard each seine -boat until the fish are closely confined in the bunt. 1. Areas used in summarizing Atlantic menhaden catch data 2 2. Distribution of fishing effort in the South Atlantic Area, 1957 ^ 3. Distribution of fishing effort in the Chesapeake Bay and Middle Atlantic Areas, 1957 "^ 4. Distribution of fishing effort in the North Atlantic Area, 1957 ^ 5. Age composition of purse-seine catches, 1957 ' 6. Length composition of samples from purse-seine catches, 1957 ^2 7. Length frequencies of males and females in samples from purse -seine catches, 1957 12 8. Weight composition of samples from purse-seine catches, 1957 15 TABLES 1. Catch, total fishing effort, and catch per unit of effort, Atlantic nien- haden purse-seine fishery, 1957 ^ 2. Number of samples taken from purse-seine catches, 1957 ° 3. Age connposition (in percent) and calculated number offish (in millions) at each age in purse-seine catches, 1955-57 4. Age composition (in percent) of purse -seine catches, by area and sea- son, 1955-57 5. Calculated number of fish (in millions) at each age in purse-seine catches, by area and season, 1955-57 ^^ 6. Age composition (in percent) of purse -seine catches in the Middle Atlantic Area, by month, 1957 H 7. Sex ratio of fish in purse-seine catches, by area and season, 1957 13 8. Length frequencies of males and females in samples from purse-seine catches, 1957 14 iii 8 10 Page 9. Mean fork length (in millimeters) of fish at each age in samples from purse-seine catches, by area and season, 1955-57 16 10. Mean weight (in grams) of fish at each age in samples from purse-seine catches, by area and season, 1955-57 17 APPENDIX TABLES 1. Length-frequency distributions in samples from purse-seine catches. South Atlantic Area, excluding the North Carolina fall fishery, 1957 .. 22 2. Length-frequency distributions in samples from purse-seine catches, Chesapeake Bay Area, 1957 23 3. Length-frequency distributions in samples from purse-seine catches, Middle Atlantic Area, 1957 24 4. Length-frequency distributions in samples from purse-seine catches. North Atlantic Area, 1957 25 5. Length-frequency distributions in sannples from purse-seine catches. North Carolina fall fishery, 1957 26 6. Weight-frequency distributions in samples from purse-seine catches. South Atlantic Area, excluding the North Carolina fall fishery, 1957.. 28 7. Weight-frequency distributions in samples from purse-seine catches, Chesapeake Bay Area, 1957 29 8. Weight-frequency distributions in samples from purse-seine catches. Middle Atlantic Area, 1957 30 9. Weight-frequency distributions in samples from purse-seine catches. North Atlantic Area, 1957 32 10. Weight-frequency distributions in samples from purse-seine catches. North Carolina fall fishery, 1957 34 11. Mean fork length and weight in samples from purse-seine catches. South Atlantic Area, excluding the North Carolina fall fishery, 1957 .. 36 12. Mean fork length and weight in samples from purse-seine catches, Chesapeake Bay Area, 1957 36 13. Mean fork length and weight in samples from purse -seine catches, Middle Atlantic Area, 1957 37 14. Mean fork length and weight in samples from purse-seine catches. North Atlantic Area, 1957 38 15. Mean fork length and weight in samples from purse -seine catches. North Carolina fall fishery, 1957 39 IV AGE AND SIZE COMPOSITION OF THE MENHADEN CATCH ALONG THE ATLANTIC COAST OF THE UNITED STATES, 1957 WITH A BRIEF REVIEW OF THE COMMERCIAL FISHERY by Fred C. June ABSTRACT The 1957 purse -seine catch of Atlantic menhaden (Brevoortia tyrannus) amounted to 632,000 tons, 91 percent of which was taken in the "summer" fishery. Landings in the Middle Atlantic Area ac- counted for the greatest share (54 percent) of the total for the coast. Total fishing effort (31,600 sets) was the highest in 3 years, and average catch per unit of effort amounted to 20 tons per set as com- pared with 26 tons in 1955 and 1956. Samples from the catches showed that the 1955 and 1956 year classes (fish of ages 2 and 1) were about equally represented and together constituted over four-fifths of the total catch of 3.6 billion fish. The 1956 year class (age-1 fish) provided nnost of the catch in the South Atlantic and Chesapeake Bay Areas; the 1955 year class (age-2 fish), accounted for the greatest share of the catch in the Mid- dle and North Atlantic Areas; and the 1957 year class (age-0 fish) contributed the greatest number of fish to the fall catch off the coast of North Carolina. Fish of the dominant age groups in the summer catches in the various areas were shorter in length and lighter in weight than those of the same ages in the previous 2 years. Varia- tions in the contributions of recent year classes are discussed. INTRODUCTION This is the third in a series of reports which sunnmarizes data result- ing from an annual catch-sampling pro- gram conducted by the Bureau of Com- mercial Fisheries on the menhaden Note.- -Fred C. June, Fishery Research Biologist, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Beaufort, North Carolina. stocks' along the Atlantic coast of the United States. The Gulf menhaden fish- ery is not treated in this paper. The immediate objective of the catch- sampling program is to furnish data for measuring variations in composition *A stock, as used in this report, is defined as a group of fish belonging to a single species which occurs in a fishable concentration in a given area of the coast during a given period of the year. of the catch. The work constitutes the primary phase of an investigation aimed at determining the effects of fishing and natural factors on the menhaden resource. This report includes a review of the 1957 purse-seine fishery; meas- ures of total catch, fishing effort, and catch per unit of effort, together with information on the geographical dis- tribution of fishing effort; sunnmary data on the number, age, length, weight, and sex of Atlantic menhaden (Breyoo?'- tia tyr annus) caught by purse seines in 1957; and a brief discussion of the observations. The review of fishing activities and summaries of data per- taining to the "summer" fishery are referred to the four geographical areas shown in figure 1; the North Carolina "fall" fishery is treated separately. The continued cooperation of men- haden reduction plant owners and oper- ators who provided space and facilities for processing of the catch samples and furnished records of vessel land- ings is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are due to the vessel captains and pilots who furnished logbooks of their daily fishing activities; without these records, most of the information on the location juid annount of fishing would have been lacking. Catch samples were obtained by temporary field assistants stationed at the various reduction plant loca- tions. Joseph R. Higham was respon- sible for the age determinations and assisted in the supervision of the catch-sampling program. George Rawlings compiled the fishing effort data from vessel log records. Mary K. Hancock was responsible for the com- pilation of the biostatistical data and assisted in their analysis. THE 1957 PURSE-SEINE FISHERY The 1957 purse-seine catch of Atlantic menhaden, 63 2,000 tons, was the smallest produced in the past 3 years (table 1)'; 576,000 tons were taken in the "summer" fishery (late March to mid-October) and 56,000 tons in the North Carolina "fall" fishery (mid-November to mid- January 1958).' In the summer fishery, catches were Figure 1. — Areas used in summarizing Atlantic menhaden catch data. 'The pound-net catch of Atlantic menhaden in 1957 amounted to about 25,000 tons; miscellaneous gears, in- cluding gill nets, haul seines, fyke nets, and oner trawls, accounted for an additional 2,000 tons. Because of the lack of adetpiate statistics, the pound-net fishery was not discussed as in previous reports in this series. 'For convenience, the activities of the menhaden purse-seine fishery have been grouped into two arbitrary time periods. The "summer" fishery or season is con- sidered to commence with the appearance of schools in the surface waters along the coast, generally, sometime between April and June and terminates with their dis- appearance from the surface waters, usually in October. The "fall" fishery or season begins with the reappearance of large, migrating schools in the surface waters off Cape Hatteras, N. C., in November and terminates when the fish vanish off Cape Fear, N. C, in late December or early January. TABI£ 1. — Catch, total fishing effort, and catch per unit of effort of the Atlantic menhaden purse-seine fishery, 1955-57 Season and area Catch in thousands of tons Total fishing effort (number of sets)-"- Average catch per purse -seine set (tons) 1955 1956 2 1957 1955 1956 1957 1955 1956 1957 SlftAIER FISHERY South Atlantic 48 153 328 83 612 73 685 73 89 402 95 659 81 740 38 118 342 78 576 3 56 632 2,526 5,667 13,120 2,862 24,480 1,872 26,346 3,042 6,357 1A,357 2,714 26,360 2,531 28,462 2,375 8,428 15,545 3,250 30,316 1,474 31,600 19 27 25 29 25 39 26 24 14 28 35 25 32 26 16 Chesapeake Bay Middle Atlantic North Atlantic 14 22 24 Subtotal FALL FISHERY North Carolina Total 19 38 20 ■"" Slight discrepancies in numbers as given in previous reports and in subtotals and totals due to rounding off of figures. 2 Source: Fishery Statistics of the United States, 1957. By Edward A. Power, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Statistical Digest No. 44, 429 pp. ^ The North Carolina fall fishery normally extends into January, therefore, catch total includes January 1958, but not January 1957- Seasonal breakdown of the catch ob- tained from U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. G.F.S. Nos. 1742 and 1991. below those of the previous year in all areas except Chesapeake Bay, and in the North Carolina fall fishery the catch reached the lowest level in three seasons. As in previous years, the Middle Atlantic Area provided the greatest share of the total catch (54 percent), while the South Atlantic Area contributed the least (7 percent). Total fishing effort amounted to 31,600 sets, an 8 percent increase over that in 1956 (table l).* Effort in the summer fishery (30,316 sets) was 15 percent greater than that in 1956, but in the North Carolina fall fishery (1,474 sets), it was 42 percent less than that in the previous year. Catch per unit of effort averaged 20 tons per set as compared with 26 tons in 1955 and in 1956. Average catch per unit * Logbook data upon which catch per unit of effort calculations were based represented 52 percent of the purse-seine c:atch; adjustments were made to account for the total catch. of effort in the summer fishery was below that of the previous 2 years in all areas except Chesapeake Bay, but in the North Carolina fall fishery it exceeded that in 1956 and nearly equaled that in 1955. There were 133 vessels engaged in the summer fishery (130 vessels in 1956) and 63 in the fall fishery off North Carolina (59 vessels in 1956). Thirty-eight airplanes, or an average of about one airplane for every three vessels, were employed for locating fish and directing the setting of the seine around a school. As a result of tests conducted during 1956, the "power block", a mechanical gear for hauling the seine aboard the purse boats, was adopted by about half of the fleet operating in Chesapeake Bay in 1957. Crews aboard those vessels equipped with the "power block" were reduced from 28 to an average of 13 men. It was estimated that use of this gear also shortened the time required in "drying up" the net by about 6 minutes per set. South Atlantic Area Purse-seine fishing in the South Atlantic Area began on March 23 off Fernandina Beach, Fla., but only occa- sional catches were made in this lo- cality during, the remainder of the month and through most of April. Numerous schools were encountered in the inshore waters between Jackson- ville, Fla., and Brunswick, Ga., during May, but they were reported to be small and difficult to catch. Stormy weather further impaired fishing dur- ing this period. Between April 24 and June 5, there were only 15 days on which vessels were able to go to sea. In late May, 3 of the 14 vessels fish- ing out of Fernandina shifted toYonges Island, S. C, and in early June addi- tional vessels left for the Gulf of Mexico. Only 4 vessels remained at Fernandina after June 8, and nriost of the landings during the month were contributed by a single vessel. Fish- ing during July was concentrated in St. Sinnon Sound, Ga., and St. Helena Sound, S. C., and catches in these localities were the heaviest of the season. Catches progressively declined during August and September, and fish- ing terminated on October 9 at Fer- nandina and on October 1 7 at Yonges Island. Fishing by the North Carolina fleet (17 vessels) began during the lastweek in April off Southport and during the following week off Beaufort. Southport vessels encountered numerous schools in the vicinity of Cape Fear during the first 2 weeks of the season, but adverse weather interrupted fishing during the second week in May, and total landings during the month were unusually light. On June 3, Southport vessels shifted to South Carolina waters, and during the following 3 weeks, productive fishing occurred from Myrtle Beach to George- town, S. C. Schools became scarce in this locality during the last week of June, and the vessels returned to North Carolina waters. Adverse weather pre- vailed in the vicinity of Cape Fear during the last 3 weeks in July, and only five landings were made at South- port during this period. Except for 2 weeks of moderately good fishing in this locality in August, landings through the remainder of the season were small and infrequent. The last landing at Southport was made on October 18. The first catches of the summer sea- son in the vicinity of Beaufort were made on May 6 when schools appeared in abundance from New Topsail Inlet to Cape Lookout. Four days later the fish vanished, and few schools were encountered in ocean waters off Beau- fort through the rennainder of the sum- mer. With the absence of the schools in "outside" waters, the Beaufort fleet began fishing in Core andBogue Sounds (primarily in Core Sound). Although catches were small, they were re- corded almost daily from June 1 through September 26. The schools disappeared following a period of heavy rainfall in late September and early October, and few fish were encountered in these waters again until November when the appearance of the large, migrating schools marked the beginning of the fall fishing season. The summer catch in the South Atlantic Area amounted to 38,000 tons as compared with 73,000 tons in 1956 and 48,000 tons in 1955. June provided the greatest share of the summer catch (37 percent), followed by July (19 percent). May and August (14 per- cent each), September (10 percent), April (4 percent), October (2 percent), and March (1 percent). Catch per unit of effort averaged 16 tons per set as compared with 19 tons in 1955 and 24 tons in 1956. Chesapeake Bay Area The purse-seine season in Chesa- peake Bay officially opened on May 27,' with fishing by 24 vessels concen- trated in the lower Bay in the vicinity of Cape Charles. Relatively small schools were encountered in abundance along the eastern shore and in the central part of the Bay through most 5 Virginia law prohibits purse-seining in Virginia waters prior to the last Monday in May. of the season. The schools began to disappear in these localities during the second week in October, and, ex- cept for sporadic catches, most of the fishing through the closing weeks of the season was conducted from Cape Charles northward to southern Long Island. The last landings of the season were made on October 25. The purse -seine catch in the Chesapeake Bay Area amounted to 118,000 tons as compared to 89,000 tons in 1956 and the recent record of 153,000 tons in 1955. July landings accounted for 26 percent of the sea- son's total, while June, August, and September respectively accounted for 22, 20, and 24 percent. Catch per unit of effort averaged 14 tons per set, the same as in the previous year, but this was considerably less than that in 1955 (27 tons per set). and Fire Island, N. Y. Landings from these waters during the last 2 weeks of the season amounted to over 75,000 tons, the largest recorded for any similar period during the season. The large, migrating schools were last encountered about 25 miles offshore, between Townsends Inlet and Asbury Park, N. J., on October 25. One addi- tional purse-seine set was made on a school of young-of-the-year fish off Beach Haven, N. J., on October 29. A catch of 342,000 tons was 60,000 tons below that of the previous year, but 14,000 tons greater than that in 1955. Twenty-eight percent of the catch was taken in July; May, June, August, September, and October respectively accounted for 2, 17, 20, 14, and 19 percent. Catch per unit of effort aver- aged 22 tons per set, the lowest in 5 years. Middle Atlantic Area Fishing began in the Middle Atlantic Area on May 22 when small, scattered schools were located simul- taneously in Delaware and Raritan Bays. During the following 3 weeks a fleet of 47 vessels scouted the waters from Long Island to Cape Charles, but catches were spotty throughout the area. In mid-June, schools suddenly appeared in abundance along the coast from Ocean City, Md., to Sandy Hook, N. J. After a week of productive fish- ing, the schools became scarce, but reappeared in abundance during the first week in July. As the season advanced, schools often would dis- appear in the inshore waters and occur far offshore, but fishing in the deeper waters was relatively unproductive. As a result, catches during most of July and August were highly variable. Catches were small through most of September, but during the second week in October, large schools of migrating fish appeared along the coast of south- ern Long Island and individual vessel catches sharply increased. From Oc- tober 8 through October 25, fishing by the entire Middle Atlantic fleet, to- gether with vessel from Amagansett, N. Y., and Chesapeake Bay, was con- centrated between Seaside Park, N. J., North Atlantic Area The purse-seine fishery in the North Atlantic Area got underway dur- ing the second week in June, with 10 vessels fishing out of Amagansett, N. Y.; 2 out of Point Judith, R. I.; and 4 out of Gloucester, Mass. By the first week in July, 2 additional vessels had entered the fishery at Point Judith, and 10 vessels were added to the fleet at Gloucester. In late July, 3 vessels began fishing in the vicinity of Portland, Maine. * Fishing by the Amagansett vessels was conducted along the eastern end of Long Island during the first 5 weeks of the season, and catches were highly variable. The fish disappeared in this locality during the second week in July, and the fleet shifted to Massa- chusetts waters where numerous schools had been reported in Nantucket Sound. The heaviest catches of the season were made in the vicinity of Cape Cod during the week of July 15- 20, but in the following week the schools 'With one exception, vessels employed in the men- haden fishery at Point Judith, R. I.; Gloucester. Mass.; and Portland, Maine, were small to medium-size otter trawlers which converted to purse-seining during the summer months. were scattered and difficult to catch. The Amagansett fleet returned to New York waters where schools again were encountered off the eastern end of Long Island. Fishing continued in Long Island waters through the close of the season (October 23). Fishing in Narragansett Bay by Point Judith vessels was relatively unproductive until the second week in July. Schools which subsequently con- gregated in the upper reaches of the Bay provided consistently good catches through the remainder of the summer. The last landings at Point Judith were made on October Z3. Early season landings at Glou- cester were extremely light, with fish- ing restricted to the eastern end of Cape Cod. During the first week in July, however, schools became in- creasingly abundant in Massachusetts and Plymouth Bays, and during the following 4 weeks good catches were made almost daily in these localities. Schools became scarce in early August, and, except for a week of fair fishing on several large schools of migrating fish encountered off the eastern end of Cape Cod in early September, land- ings during the remainder of the season were generally poor. Fishing termi- nated in this locality on September 24. Although schools appeared to be fairly numerous in Maine waters from late July through late August, vessel captains reported that they were deep and difficult to catch. Only eleven landings were' recorded at Portland during the entire season, all of which originated in the vicinity of Case o Bay. The purse -seine catch in the North Atlantic Area amounted to 78,000 tons. This was adecrease of 17,000 tons from that of the previous year and 5,000 tons below that in 1955. The July fish- ery provided the greatest share of the catch (29 percent), followed by August (25 percent), September (22 percent), June (13 percent), and October (11 percent). Catch per unit of effort amoiinted to 24 tons per set, the low- est in the past 3 years (36 tons in 1956 and 29 tons in 1955). North Carolina Fall Fishery The fall fishing season in North Carolina extended from November 14 through January 12, 1958, but 98 per- cent of the catch was taken in only 16 days of fishing between November 16 and December 28. Fishing during the first 2 weeks of the season was re- stricted to several huge schools of large fish which traveled slowly along the coast between Drum Inlet and Cape Lookout. Schools of smaller fish were present at the same time in the in- shore waters west of Cape Lookout, but these were largely ignored by the fleet. Adverse weather interrupted fishing during the first and second weeks in December when fish were reported by airplane pilots to be in greatest abundance on the grounds. When fishing resumed on December 16, most of the large fish had already migrated beyond the range of the fleet, and the catch from Dec ember 18 through the end of the season was contributed exclusively by young- of-the -year which had first appeared inside Cape Look- out in early December. A catch of 56,300 tons was only about two-thirds that of the previous year (81,000 tons) and the lowest since 1953. December landings accounted for 52 percent of the total for the season; November accounted for 45 percent, with the remainder contributed in January 1958. Catch per unit of effort, 3 8 tons per set, was about the same as in 1955 (39 tons per set), but greater than that in 1956 (3 2 tons per set). Distribution of Fishing Effort The geographical distribution of fishing effort by the purse-seine fleet in 1957 is shown in figures 2, 3, and 4 where the calculated number of purse-seine sets was plotted within 10-minute unit areas. It may be seen that fishing was conducted from the northeast coast of Florida northward to the central Gulf of Maine, with most of the catches made inside the 20- fathom contour. Unit areas in which fishing was concentrated (200 sets and over) were located in the vicinity of Fernandina, Fla., and Cape Fear, N. C; in Chesapeake Bay and coastal waters Figure 2.- -Distribution of fishing effort in the South Atlantic Area, 1957. Figure 3.--Distrlbution of fishing effort in the Chesapeake Bay and Middle Atlantic Areas, 1957. Figure 4.--Distribution of fishing effort in the North Atlantic Area, 1957, immediately north of Cape Charles; within a 10-mile wide coastal band extending from lat. 38°10' N. (off Ocean City, Md.) northward (including Delaware Bay) to Fire Island on the southern coast of Long Island; and Narragansett Bay. About 65 percent of the total fishing effort was expended within these unit areas. Compared with the previous year, there were fewer sets made near the ends of the range, and the greatest reduction occurred in the vicinity of Fernandina, Fla., and in Massachusetts Bay. Other note- worthy changes from 1956 were (1) an increase in the amount of fishing inside Delaware Bay and (2) an offshore extension of fishing in the Middle Atlantic Area. SAMPLING OF THE CATCH The 1957 catch- sampling program was conducted throughout the range and season of the purse -seine fishery. The number of samples obtained at the various plant locations is given in table 2. While an attempt was made to sample the catch in the same propor- tion in each plant locality, practical limitations precluded close adherence to this objective. One sample was obtained for every 674 tons of fish caught during the summer season and for every 1,000 tons during the North Carolina fall season. Methods of col- lecting and processing the samples followed those described in the first TABLE 2. — Number of samples taken from purse-seine catches, 1957 report in this series (June andReintjes, 1959). Age Composition In table 3 are given the calculated percentage age composition and the number of fish at each age in the 1957 Atlantic coast purse-seine catch, to- gether with comparable data for 1955 and 1956. The 1955 and 1956 year classes (fish of ages Zand 1) contributed almost equally to the 1957 purse -seine catch and together accounted for over four- fifths of the total calculated number of individuals. Although fish of the 1956 year class (age 1) were most numerous in the catch, their contribution (1.5 billion) was less than that of the pre- vious year class at age 1 in 1956 (2.1 billion). This was the second year in succession, however, that fish of age 1 exceeded in number those of any other age group. The 1955 year class (age 2) furnished 1.4 billion fish to the 1957 catch. This represented the largest contribution by fish of age 2 in the past 3 years. The 1957 year class (age 0) ranked third in number of fish caught in 1957 (0.3 billion). Its contri- bution exceeded by tenfold that of the 1956 year class at age 0 in 1956, but TABLE 3. — Age composition (in percent) and calculated number of fish (in millions) at each age in pxirse -seine catches, 1955-57 (Numerically dominant year class underscored) Season and locality Number of samples SUMMER FISHERY Femandina, Fla 63 Southport, N. C 25 Beaufort, N. C 75 Reedville, Va 165 Lewes , Del 117 Wildwood, N. J 85 Port Monmouth, N. J 15i Amagansett, N. Y 121 Gloucester, Mass A2 Portland , Maine 7 Subtotal 85-4 FALL FISHERY Beaufort - Jtorehead City, N. C 56 Total 910 AGE COMPOSITION Age Year 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8-10 Total 1955 1956 2A.71 1.00 8.^6 20.68 57.16 3^.21 25.97 41.00 8.73 9.61 3.26 10.01 1.26 2.52 1.23 <;.i8 i.';o 0.35 0.67 1.22 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.02 0.02 0.04 100.00 99.99 1957 41.97 99.99 NUMBER OF FISH 1955 1956 761.01 36.37 300.77 636.86 2,072.95 1,053.47 941.71 1,456.63 268.87 348.42 115.96 308.21 45.60 89.72 37.95 151.49 49.66 10.75 24.38 43.43 1.88 4.47 4.34 0.59 0.88 1.27 3,079.59 3,626.27 1957 1,491.13 3,552.91 it was less than one-half that furnished by the 1955 year class at the sanne age in 1955. Older year classes (fish of ages 3-10) contributed only one -half as many fish to the catch in 1957 (0.3 billion) as those at comparable ages in the previous Z years (0.6 billion). The percentage age composition (based on numbers of fish) of the summer catches in the different areas and of the fall catch in North Carolina waters is shown in figure 5. Tables 4 and 5 furnish comparative data for the years 1955-57. In the South Atlantic Area, age -2 fish (I955 year class) furnished over two-thirds of the summer catch, and age-1 fish (1956 year class) accounted for most of the remainder. The con- tribution by age-1 fish in 1957 was only about one -tenth that of the pre- vious year class at the same age in 1956, and for the first tinne in the past 111 (r UJ o CI 23456789 AGE 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 I94S 1948 YEAR CLASS Figure 5.- -Age composition of purse-seine catches, 1957. 3 years, age -2 fish formed the largest share of the catch in the area. Age-0 fish (1957 year class) also were repre- sented in the catch in greater number in 1957. The number of age-1 fish (1956 year class) in the Chesapeake Bay catch was nearly three times that in the previous year, and almost five times that in 1955. This age group accounted for over four -fifths of the 1957 catch, and age-2 fish (1955 year class) accounted for nnost of the re- mainder. As in the previous 2 years, fish of older ages contributed little or nothing to the Bay fishery. The Middle Atlantic catch was dominated by age-2 fish (1955 year class), although age-1 fish (1956 year class) accounted for nearly one -quarter of the calculated number of individuals. This was the largest representation of age-1 fish in the catch in this area in recent years. Age-1 fish did not appear in the Middle Atlantic catches until June, but their numbers gradually in- creased thereafter and reached a peak in September when they accounted for over one -half the catch (table 6). Older age groups were presented in the area early in the season, but as the summer progressed, their numbers in the catches diminished. Older fish, how- ever, provided the greatest share of the catch in October when they were en- countered in large schools off southern Long Island. For the first year on record, fish of age 2 also dominated the catch in the North Atlantic Area in 1957, and this also was the first year that age-1 fish appeared in the catches in this area. Fish of ages 3 and 4 (1954 and 1953 year classes) were about equally represented in the catch as were those of ages 5 and 6 (1952 and 1951 year classes). As in the previous four sum- mers, older fish were encountered in greatest numbers in this area. In the North Carolina fall fishery, fish of age 0 (1957 year class) ac- counted for nearly three -fourths of the nunnber of fish caught in 1957. Most of the remainder was furnished TABLE 4. — Age composition (in percent) of purse-seine catches, by area and season, 1955-57 [Niimerically doniinant year class underscored] Area, year Ag e and season 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8-10 SUMMER FISHERY South Atlantic: 1955 1956 1957 1.66 3.65 65.22 98.98 32.47 27.02 0.94 63.76 3.32 0.05 0.12 2.77 0.02 ~ — ~ ~ Chesapealce Bay: 1955 1956 1957 1.63 0.25 44.77 90.91 85.22 51.30 9.02 14.25 1.54 0.07 0.26 0.69 0.02 0.06 0.01 — ~ Middle Atlantic: 1955 1956 1957 — 1.81 14.78 22.24 55.79 63.96 68.51 23.18 18.08 4.26 17.43 1.44 2.62 1.40 1.41 1.26 0.26 0.26 1.02 0.10 0.06 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.05 North Atlantic: 1955 1956 1957 — 0.91 0.25 6.41 45.00 13.94 36.35 18.79 67.55 8.22 16.06 12.84 40.96 8.59 4.65 6.42 8.95 0.54 1.29 1.45 0.22 0.36 0.24 FAT.T, FISHERY North Carolina: 1955 1956 1957 87.19 16.12 7-;. 20 3.61 26.78 3.24 6.00 11.95 6.08 0.86 16.61 4.07 1.96 4.15 5.40 0.32 20.61 3.84 0.04 3.31 2.89 0.46 0.25 0.01 0.02 by fish of ages 1 through 6, each of which was represented in roughly the same proportion. Length Composition The percentage length distribu- tions of fish in samples from the summer purse -seine catches in each area and from the fall catch off North Carolina in 1957 are shown in figure 6 (see also appendix tables 1-5). Fish caught during the summer in the South Atlantic Area ranged from about 110 to 245 mm., and those of age 2 (1955 year class) furnished the principal modal length group (160 to 245 mm.). Fish of age 1 (1956 year class) showed considerable variation in length and ranged from about 110 to 215 mm. Furthermore, their lengths virtually overlapped those of age -2 fish, and the only suggestion of a dis- tinct nnode in the length-frequency polygon of age-1 fish occurred at the same length (192 mm.) as in age -2 fish. The larger age-1 fish came mostly from northern Florida waters where age-1 fish taken in late summer were similar in length to age -2 fish caught in early summer (age-1 fish ranged from 155 to 200 mm. with a median length of 187.1 mm., and age-2 fish ranged from 160 to 210 mm. with a median length of 188.5 mm.). 10 TABL£ 5. — Calculated number of fish (In millions) at each age In purse-seine catches, by area and season, 1955-57 [ Numerically dominant year class underscored] Area, year and season Age 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8-10 Total SUMffiR FISHERY South Atlantic: 1955 6.51 13.27 12.18 3.12 742.32 36.37 284.39 255.20 1,U7.88 U7.91 334.24 674.37 1,056.16 16.66 190.28 302.78 1.87 30.76 60.42 12.41 105.74 10.91 231.56 382.92 66.90 176.58 513.31 823.35 932.53 0.42 13.58 92.66 51.08 26.97 23.30 13.01 0.63 0.42 11.52 0.49 3.22 312.26 232.82 58.05 23.76 77.00 38.68 7.32 37.48 15.60 10.83 0.23 5.17 0.22 160.40 18.60 35.72 115.10 17.41 33.07 16.71 9.36 20.72 0.02 0.43 0.08 12.90 18.19 17.15 21.88 86.78 17.69 2.74 46.50 W.74 2.34 3.31 13.92 7.93 13.59 18.44 0.39 7.48 11.07 0.96 0.71 0.40 0.92 2.73 2.99 1.03 0.95 • •• 0.12 0.13 0.69 0.37 0.75 0.50 0.10 0.08 391.29 1,159.67 363.16 746.46 1955 1957 Chesapeake Bay: 1955 1956 741.76 1957 1,239.38 1,018.95 1,287.39 1,361.24 170.38 ?n.84 205.90 Middle Atlantic: 1955 1956 ig-i? North Atlantic: 1955 1956 1957 FAI.T, FISHERY North Carolina: 1955 1956 1957 851.42 225.61 383.26 TABLE 6. — Age composition (in percent) of purse-seine catches in the Middle Atlantic Area, by month, 1957 Month Age 55 8-10 May June July August. . . . September. October. . . 6.89 12.34 4-0.38 50.41 16.70 84.74 87.26 84.45 56.88 45.15 30.72 8.34 5.34 2.15 1.79 2.49 15.57 2.72 0.34 0.52 0.60 1.36 19.06 1.88 0.04 0.16 0.06 0.29 10.42 2.27 0.12 0.32 0.29 0.15 7.13 0.05 0.07 0.18 0.05 0.07 0.22 In Chesapeake Bay the lengths of fish in the samples ranged from 130 to 270 mm. The length curve for age-1 fish showed a prominent mode at 177 mm., while that for age-2 fish showed a peak at 227 mm. Lengths of fish in the Middle Atlantic Area ranged from about 125 to 365 mnn. with three distinct size groups evident. The first two length groups, for the most part, represented fish of ages 1 and 2 which supported the catch through most of the sum- mer, while the most advanced group included mainly older fish which ap- peared in the late -season catches off southern Long Island. In the North Atlantic Area, two major length groups were apparent in the 1957 catches --age -2 fish which 11 u z u I I I I' I J ( — I I f I I — n~ N. 15.774 l\ SOUTH ATLANTIC AREA ^^ AGE-OflSH ^^ AGE-2 FISH g*^ flGE-IFlSM l??l AGE-SFISH ^B AGE-4 AND OLDER FISH CHESAPEAKE BAY AREA N-36,S83 MIDDLE ATLANTIC AREA NORTH ATLANTIC AREA N- 6.100 NORTH CAROLINA 1^1 IT ^ ao 100 120 140 l«0 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 S20 340 360 FORK LENGTH IN MILLIMETERS Figure 6.- -Length c»mposition of samples from purse-seine catches, 1957. ranged from about 200 to 300 mm. and fish of age 4 and older ages, which ranged from about 280 to 360 mm. Fish of age 3 were completely obscured in the total length distribution. The lengths of fish in samples from the North Carolina fall fishery ranged from about 75 to 355 mm., with those of older ages represented by a dominant mode at 312 mm. Age-0 fish accounted for the greatest portion of the length curve below 230 mm. and comprised two size groups, one with a peak at 92 mm. and the other with a peak at 142 mm. As noted for previous years (June and Reintjes, 1959 and I960), the most obvious features of the 1957 length- frequency curves were (1) the hetero- geneity of the length-age groups in the various areas, (2) the complete absence of larger, older fish in the summer purse -seine catches in South Atlantic and Chesapeake Bay waters, (3) the paucity of small fish in northern waters, (4) the gradual increase from south to north in lengths of fish com- prising the youngest age groups, (5) the occurrence in the fall fishery off North Carolina of homologous length groups represented in the sum- mer catches farther northward, and (6) the recruitment of small, young- of-the-year fish during the fall season off North Carolina. Since differences in the nnean size of males and females have been noted in the previous reports in this series (June and Reintjes, 1959 and I960), it is of interest to examine the 1957 length distributions of each sex to determine whether such differences were sufficiently great to affect the position of the modes in the unsexed samples and thus, perhaps, make con- clusions regarding changes in length misleading. The curves in figure 7 show a parallel size differential between the sexes which became more pronounced as length increased. With the exception I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SOUTH ATLANTIC AREA MALES -FEMALES CHESAPEAKE BAY AREA NORTH ATLANTIC AREA NORTH CAROLINA FALL FISHERY ° I i~T I 1^ I I — r SO 100 120 140 ISO ISO 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 FORK LENGTH IN MILLIMETERS Figure 7.--Length frequencies of males and females in samples from purse-seine catches, 1957. 12 of data derived from Chesapeake Bay,^ the dominant peaks in the length- frequency distributions were identical up to about 265 mm., and the slight discrepancies between the sexes are not considered serious. Above this size, however, the difference between the sexes was sufficiently great to indicate that any marked changes in sex ratio could shift the position of the modes in unsexed samples. It is also evident from the curves and appendix tables 1-5 that female Atlantic men- haden not only attained a larger size, but apparently grew faster (since the female curves were displaced to the right of the males) and showed a ten- dency to live longer than the males. The predominance of females in the catches with respect to both num- bers and length is shown in tables 7 and 8. In table 7 it is seen that the males were more numerous in the South Atlantic summer catches, while in every other area, the females pre- dominated. If, however, the total num- ber of fish in each ^-centimeter length class is considered for the coast as a whole, it may be judged from table 8 that the females accounted for a greater proportion of the catch over virtually the entire size range. The unequal representation of sexes in the catch may have resulted from the selec- tivity of purse-seine gear and the apparent differential growth of the females. Weight Composition Percentage weight-frequency dis- tributions of fish in samples from the purse-seine catches in the different areas in 1957 are shown in figure 8 (see also appendix tables 6-10). The most noticeable aspects of the graphs are the marked differences in the shape of the curves and the positions and/ or lack of dominant modes. The curve for the South Atlantic Area shows a range in weight from 20 to 230 g. and TABLE 7. — Sex ratio of fish in purse- seine catches, by area and season, 1957 ^The irregularities in the length -frequency curves and sex-ratio data (table 7) for Chesapeake Bay in 1957 are believed to be the result of the difficulty in sex determinations of immature males in samples taken in late July and August when fish frequently were partially decomposed upon reaching the reduction plant. Area and season SUMMER FISHERY South Atlantic. Chesapeake Bay-"-. Middle Atlantic. North Atlantic. . FALL FISHERY North Carolina. , Males 1,5^5 1,248 3,';08 1,557 A96 Females 1,519 1,72-; 3,516 1,749 586 Ratio of females to males (percent) 0.98 1.38 1.03 1.12 1.18 See footnote 7 in left column. a prominent mode at 110 g. which is preceded by a secondary peak at 50 g. In Chesapeake Bay samples, a domi- nant mode occurs between 80 and 90 g., with the suggestion of a secondary peak between 160 and 170 g., while in those from the Middle Atlantic Area, two prominant peaks are evident, one between 130 and 140 g. and the second at 220 g. The latter curve is markedly skewed to the right and emphasizes both the concentration of weights of younger fish at the left and the com- paratively larger sizes of a few fish at the right. With minor variations, the weight curves for the South Atlantic, Chesapeake Bay, and Middle Atlantic Areas are similar in shape to the length-frequency curves shown in fig- ure 6 and, in general, show relatively the same disparity in size of fish of the same age, both within and between the three areas. In contrast to other areas, fish taken during the summer in the North Atlantic Area were highly variable in weight, ranging from about 160 to 900 g., and the weight curve shows no concentration of fish in any one weight class. This probably was the result of a combination of factors, including a proportionately greater increase in 13 TABLE 8. — Length frequencies of males and females in samples from purse-seine catches, 1957 Fork tlales Females Fork length (mm.) Males Females length (ram.) Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Cumulative Number total Number total Number total Number total 75-79... 1 1 225-229.. 274 4,151 228 4,433 80-84... 1 1 1 2 230-234.. 353 4,504 327 4,760 85-89... 4 5 3 5 235-239.. 376 4,880 360 5,120 90-94... 6 11 9 14 240-244.. 308 5,188 335 5,455 95-99... 7 18 9 23 245-249.. 273 5,461 286 5,741 100-104.. 7 25 5 28 250-254.. 234 5,695 264 6,005 105-109.. 2 27 5 33 255-259.. 238 5,933 222 6,227 110-114.. 2 29 2 35 260-264.. 227 6,160 204 6,431 115-119.. 1 30 7 42 265-269.. 190 6,350 205 6,636 120-124.. 17 47 22 64 270-274.. 160 6,510 168 6,804 125-129.. 22 69 16 80 275-279.. 104 6,614 121 6,925 130-134.. 39 108 34 114 280-284.. 118 6,732 110 7,035 135-139.. 46 154 41 155 285-289.. 109 6,841 92 7,127 140-144.. 55 209 52 207 290-294. . 105 6,946 109 7,236 1A5-149.. 51 260 65 272 295-299.. 165 7, in 121 7,357 150-154.. 60 320 74 346 300-304.. 226 7,337 113 7,470 155-159.. 62 382 106 452 305-309.. 259 7,596 194 7,664 160-164.. 99 481 158 610 310-314.. 261 7,857 281 7,945 165-169.. 146 627 229 339 315-319.. 214 8,071 329 8,274 170-174.. 238 865 337 1,176 320-324. . 120 8,191 359 8,633 175-179.. 349 1,21A 355 1,531 325-329.. 45 8,236 247 8,880 180-184.. 402 1,616 440 1,971 330-334.. 16 8,252 127 9,007 185-189.. 475 2,091 418 2,389 335-339.. 2 8,254 51 9,058 190-194.. 478 2,569 453 2,842 340-344.. _ ~ 20 9,078 195-199.. 378 2,947 396 3,238 345-349.. ~ — 10 9,088 200-204.. 249 3,196 282 3,520 350-354.. — — 4 9,092 205-209.. 174 3,370 193 3,713 355-359.. ~ — — ~ 210-214.. 151 3,521 164 3,877 360-364.. — — 2 9,09* 215-219.. 220-224.. 153 203 3,674 3,877 1A5 183 4,022 4,205 Total. . . 8,254 8,254 9,094 9,094 weight than in length as the fish grow older; sexual dimorphism referred to earlier in this section; the simul- taneous occurrence in the catches of both sexually maturing and spawned- out fish; variations in feeding con- ditions; a mixing in northern waters of faster-growing, younger fish with older fish whose growth in length has di- nninished, etc. Fish weights in the North Carolina fall fishery formed two separate curves, one ranging to roughly 180 g. and the second from 330 to 790 g. The first curve shows two equally prominent peaks, one at 10 and the other at 40 g. From appendix table 10 it may be seen that young-of-the-year fish (age-0) accounted for the greatest proportion of the first curve. It is of interest to note that the heavier fish in this age group (20 to 110 g.) were represented in the catch samples through most of December, whereas the lighter fish of this age (0-20 g.) did not appear in the catches until late December and subsequently formed the greatest portion of the catch. The second curve in the North Carolina weight distribution shows a mode at 560 g. and except for the absence of fish in the extreme weight classes, is of the same general asymmetric shape as that depicting the North Atlantic summer catch. 14 1 — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — I — r SOUTH ATLANTIC AREA 1 — I — I "Ti — r 1 — I — I — I I I r 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 BODY WEIGHT IN GRAMS Figure 8.--Weight composition of samples from purse-seine catches, 1957. Average Length and Weight The average lengths and weights of fish at each age, by sex, in the 1957 catches are given in appendix tables 11-15. Summary data for the past 3 years (tables 9 and 10) show that fish of the numerically dominant age group in the sunnmer catches in the different areas were shorter, and lighter, on the average, in 1957 than those of the same age in the previous 2 years; however, in all areas this difference was restricted almost entirely to fish of ages 1 and 2 (1956 and 1955 year classes respectively). The predomi- nance of these age groups thus was reflected in a reduction in the aver- age size of fish in the summer catches in all areas (last column in tables 9 and 10). Among the middle age groups (ages 3 to 6) there was a tendency for fish to be slightly larger in 1957, although in those age classes represented by adequate num- bers of fish, the difference probably 15 TABLE 9. — Mean fork length (in millimeters) of fish at each age in samples from purse -seine catches, by area and season, 1955-57 [Numerically dominant year class underscored] Area, year Age Mean and season 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SUMMER FISHERY South Atlantic: 1955 128 168 195 208 212 -- — — -- — — 177 1956 -- 159 198 214 224 234 -- — — — — 160 1957 129 167 190 218 — -- -- -- -- — -- 180 Chesapeake Bay: 1955 152 199 236 244 251 242 219 1956 -- 187 222 293 -- — — — -- — — 191 1957 158 180 221 ??3 267 252 — — — -- — 186 Middle Atlantic: 1955 — 228 259 279 290 300 314 333 310 — — 274 1956 — 221 200 252 240 286 279 302 309 311 314 317 317 321 306 332 324 327 ~ 264 1957 240 North Atlantic: 1955 — ~ 277 287 301 316 323 330 336 347 344 303 1956 — 218 277 266 290 292 307 309 315 317 322 321 328 322 336 321 340 332 — 306 1957 295 FALL FISHERY North Carolina: 1955 123 118 129 209 182 181 259 262 285 282 298 302 304 308 314 317 312 319 321 318 322 325 323 338 334 — — 215 1956 253 1957 269 is not significant. Fish comprising the oldest age groups (ages 7-9). in general, were smaller in the sum- mer catches than in the previous year, but this nnay be due to the relatively small numbers of fish represented in these age classes. Compared with the previous 2 seasons, fish taken in the North Carolina fall fishery were larger, on the average, at most ages in 1957. As was found in previous years (June and Reintjes, 1959 and I960), the data in tables 9 and 10 also show that in the summer fishery there was a progressive increase in the average length and weight of fish of the same age from south to north, and, except for the two youngest age-classes, fish taken in the fall fishery off North Carolina were larger and heavier than those taken in the summer catches. The snnaller and lighter fish of age 1 in the North Carolina fall catches could have been the remains of the local, summer stock, since they oc- curred only in the early fall catches and were most similar in length and weight to age-1 fish taken in the final weeks of the summer season at Beau- fort. 16 TABLE 10. — Mean weight (in grams) of fish at each age in samples from purse-seine catches, by area and season, 1955-57 [Numerically dominant year class xmderscored ] Area, year and season Age 10 Mean SUMMER FISHERY South Atlantic: 1955 Jl936 •••••••••• jSyj /«•••••••«• Chesapeake Bay: 1955 1957 Middle Atlantic: 1955 1956 1957 North Atlantic: 1955 1956 1957 FALL FISHERY North Carolina: 1955 1956 1957 35 32 60 68 82 _67 83 U2 118 31 28 35 97 225 206 149 190 166 116 94 125 134 117 222 196 171 317 305 257 401 395 352 356 346 452 155 176 190 262 388 181 404 448 429 426 44^ 471 460 516 540 157 217 224 278 235 257 457 522 589 494 521 566 566 563 606 327 505 582 608 589 565 607 648 582 636 596 629 621 641 615 638 690 642 646 712 643 535 691 658 660 643 664 543 688 630 732 725 706 806 784 634 760 766 612 774 98 69 102 185 125 108 385 359 270 514 522 497 256 373 450 DISCUSSION The 1957 purse-seine catch of Atlantic menhaden was the lowest in the past 3 years, and despite improve - nnents in the efficiency of fishing- - resulting from the introduction of the "power block", larger vessels, re- frigerated holds, and the increased use of aircraft and fish pumps --catch per unit of effort from most sumnner stocks declined. Although details of the general recruitment pattern are still largely unknown, the relative contributions by various year classes offer at least a partial explanation for the observed variations in the catch in the different areas in 1957. Judging from its contribution to the catch at age 1 in 1957 (1.5 billion fish), the 1956 year class appeared to be relatively abundant. The catch per unit of effort of this year class (42,000 fish) in 1957, for example, was only about a third less than that of the 1955 year class at age 1 in 1956 (65,000 fish) and nearly double that of the 1954 year class at age 1 in 1955 (23,000 fish). Its contribution to the summer 17 catch in the South Atlantic Area in 1957, however, was only about one- tenth that of the 1955 year class at age 1 in 1956 and only about one -half that of the 1954 year class at age 1 in 1955. Thus the reduced summer catch in the South Atlantic Area in 1957 appears to have resulted from the below-average recruitment of the 1956 year class to the summer stock in the area. In con- trast, the contributions of this year class to the fishery in the Chesapeake Bay and Middle Atlantic Areas ex- ceeded those of the previous two year classes at comparable age in 1955 and 1956, and its high level of abundance in the former area was directly re- sponsible for the large catch. It also is noted that for the first time on rec- ord, fish of age 1 occurred in the catches in the North Atlantic Area. In the North Carolina fall fishery this year class accounted for a relatively small share of the catch. However, because adverse weather curtailed fishing during the period when schools were present in greatest concentra- tions and because of selective fishing by the fleet on schools of larger fish, the younger age-groups prob- ably were not represented in the catches in proportion to their actual abundance on the fishing grounds. As was to be expected, our records show that the 1956 year class made a sig- nificant contribution to the catch in 1958. Based on its contributions during the first 3 years of life (4.3 billion fish), the 1955 year class appears to be the largest to enter the fishery in recent years. It- was first encountered in abundance at age 0 during the 1955 fall fishing season in North Carolina, although the significance of their num- ber in the catch was unknown (June and Reintjes, 1959, p. 16). In the following year at age 1 this year class was heavily recruited to the sumnner stocks in the South Atlantic and Chesapeake Bay Areas and accounted for well over one-half of the total purse-seine catch. The possibility that at age 2 it would contribute substantially to the 1957 catch was mentioned (June and Reintjes, I960, p. 6). This year class accounted for about two-fifths of the number of fish caught in 1957. Although variable in availability, it was the main support of the summer fishery in all areas except Chesapeake Bay and, next to the newly recruited 1957 year class, contributed the greatest number of individuals to the fall catch off the coast of North Carolina. Furthermore, this was the first year since initiation of the catch-sampling program in the North Atlantic Area (1953) that fish of age 2 formed such an important share of the catch in northern waters. From the foregoing it would appear that, if the catch per unit of effort of age-1 fish is a reliable measure of the relative success of a year class, the prospect of two relatively strong year classes occurring in succession are good. In contrast to the evidence pointing to a high level of abundance of both the 1955 and 1956 year classes, perti- nent data relating to the 1954 year class indicate that it was comparatively weak. It also is evident that over the past several years there has been a noticeable decrease in the proportions of older fish in the catches in both the Middle and North Atlantic Areas. For example, there were only about one- half as many fish of age 4 and older ages caught per unit of effort in 1957 as in 1955. This, of course, was due partly to the influence on the 1955 catch of the very abundant 1951 year class (age 4 in 1955), but it also is noted that for the first time in the past 5 years, fish younger than age 3 con- tributed substantially to the catch in northern waters in 1957. Thus the decline in the summer catch in the North Atlantic Area could have resulted from the relatively weak contribution of the 1954 year class, coupled with a reduced abundance of older year classes. The extent to which reduced availability of schools on the inshore fishing grounds was responsible for the low catch in the North Atlantic Area is unknown. It is noted, however, that nearly as many fish of age 4 and older were caught off southern Long Island during the closing weeks of the season in the Middle Atlantic Area as were taken during the entire summer in the North Atlantic Area. 18 The size of fish in the catches also had an important bearing on the summer yield in most areas in 1957. The data presented in tables 9 and 10 showed that the average size of fish in the donninant age groups contributing to the summer catches was the smallest in the past 3 years. The significance of this finding perhaps is most evident from an example provided by the fish- ery in the Middle Atlantic Area. In 1956 an estimated 1.3 billion fish produced a catch of 402,000 tons, whereas in 1957, 1.4 billion fish contributed a catch of only 342,000 tons. A possible explanation for the smaller size of fish of ages 1 and 2 in the 1957 summer catches is that pre- vailing drought conditions may have reduced the available plankton food supply in the inshore waters where these age groups normally are con- gregated in greatest abvmdance. Pre- cipitation during June, July, and August generally was less than 50 percent of normal from the Carolinas to southern New England (U. S. Weather Bureau, 1958). It also was pointed out (p. 5) that in contrast to previous summers, schools in the Middle Atlantic Area occurred farther offshore where they were less accessible to capture in the deeper waters. The larger fish in the younger age groups, therefore, may not have been represented in the catches in proportion to their actual abundance in the stock, resulting in a reduction in size of fish caught. An alternative hypothesis is that the relatively greater nunnber of fish in the 1955 and 1956 year classes increased competition for food--i.e., less food was available to the individual --and growth conse- quently was reduced. It also should be pointed out that the decrease in average size of fish in the younger age groups in the summer catches could have resulted from in- creased fishing effort. Along this line, it is of interest to note that the greatest relative decrease in average size of fish occurred in the Chesapeake Bay and Middle Atlantic Areas where in- creases in fishing effort have been proportionately greatest. Further in- vestigation of this apparent relation- ship appears to be highly desirable. SUMMARY This, the third in a series of re- ports, summarizes and discusses data obtained from the catch- sampling program conducted by th3 Bureau of Commercial Fisheries on the menhaden stocks along the Atlantic coast of the United States in 1957. The purpose of the sannpling program is to furnish data for determining the relation between fluctuations in the catch and changes in the connposition of the Atlantic menhaden (Brevoortia tyr annus) population. The 1957 purse-seine catch of At- lantic menhaden amounted to 632,000 tons, of which 576,000 tons were taken in the "sumnner" fishery. The catch was 14 percent below that of the previous year, and the fishing effort expended in taking it (31,600 sets) was 8 percent greater. The Middle Atlantic Area furnished the greatest portion of the catch (54 percent), while the South At- lantic Area furnished the least (7 percent). Catch per unit of effort in the summer fishery declined from that of the previous 2 years in all areas except Chesapeake Bay, while in the North Carolina fall fishery it was greater than that of the previous year and nearly equalled that of 1955. The 1957 fishery could be charac- terized as spotty. In the South Atlantic Area, adverse weather was partly responsible for the sporadic fishing off Fernandina, Fla., and Southport, N. C. In Chesapeake Bay, numerous small schools pro- vided productive fishing through the entire summer. Drought con- ditions during June, July, and August may have been responsible for the shifty availability of schools in the inshore coastal waters of the Mid- dle and North Atlantic Areas. Liarge schools which congregated off southern Long Island in October produced the heaviest vessel catches of the entire summer fish- ery. Although fish were present in abundance on the North Carolina 19 fall fishing grounds, unfavorable weather limited the number of fish- ing days. 4. The most productive unit fishing areas (200 sets and over) in 1957 were located (a) in the vicinity of Fernandina, Fla., and Cape Fear, N. C; (b) in Chesapeake Bay and coastal waters immediately north of Cape Charles; (c) along the coasts of Delaware, New Jersey, and western Long Island; and (d) Narragansett Bay. 5. Samples from the catch showed that the 1955 and 1956 year classes (fish of ages 3 and 2 respectively) shared almost equally in providing over four -fifths of the catch. The 1956 year class constituted the greatest portion of the summer catches in the South Atlantic and Chesapeake Bay Areas, whereas the 1955 year class dominated the summer catches in Middle and North Atlantic Areas. The 1957 year class (age 0) accounted for about three- fourths of the number of fish in the fall catch off North Carolina. There was a decline in the proportion of fish in older year classes in 1957. 6. Data on length and weight showed that fish of the dominant age group in the summer catches in all areas were smaller in 1957 than fish of the same ages in the previous 2 years. LITERATURE CITED JUNE, FRED C, AND JOHN W.REINT- JES. 1959. Age and size composition of the menhaden catch along the Atlantic Coast of the United States, 1952-55; with a brief review of the commercial fish- ery. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Special Scientific Re- port--Fisheries No. 317, 65 pp. 1960. Age and size composition of the menhaden catch along the Atlantic Coast of the United States, 1956; with a brief review of the comnnercial fishery. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Spe- cial Scientific Report--Fish- eries No. 336, 38 pp. U. S. WEATHER BUREAU. 1958. Climatological data. National summary. U. S. Weather Bu- reau, Annual Summary 1957, vol. 8, no. 13, 138 pp. MS #1028 20 APPENDIX TABLES I 0) la § u 4) C H -H c 0) C 0) I* ^ d ■P a) CO H •H -P tj <; O -P C i3 0) o 0 CQ D* (U - U (Q ± -^ ^ 0) d B ^, ^+^ S H 0) ^ C •t-i o _, -d n oj CO cd X d II S •"n Eh CO ^ OJ I d I t\ • (1) H en (U o II (U o II c„ CQ -d 0) (U 0) II en S m 0) H i 3 o EH CVJVDJ- OJMDOO 1-1 mt^VD O CVJM3 OJ [--VDVOCOVDH t^t^CVJ rOGJH C\J H H OJ on3- u^ OOH CO W < m EH IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIHIIIIIIIOJ J- [i< IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIHIIHIIIIIIIH m S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H H C\J EH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 It— ^CVJONOJf-VDCVlC^O-*VDOJroaJH i OaOLTNU^-d-H OJOMD OOHH iH H OJ ooj- rOH CO H Ph 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OJ ro J- M3-:tt— HVDHOonHcOOJOJH i HLT^Ir-OVDr-ll^-VO-* OJH H H OJ H H LTN ON 2 H H Ol H OJ H On rH EH C?J0O0JO'vOf-orot— vOOJoD^onirNcOOVOVOi-lt^H 1 i 1 i i on fe OJOJCT\t^OrnOJf-C--cOOJ_:tLr\OCTNOOCOOJ lOJH 1 1 i i i OJ OJ oo J- J- no on ro ro oo oo j- Lr\ on rH on 2 1 H rv-i t-in mt— lAcQ u^ ir-H 00 m\oco OCO -d- H H i i i i i i H O EH lOnoJOJOHHiiiHiIilllllllllllll OJ OJ H o fe imoJrjOJHiiii iiiiiiiiiii R} 2 iiOHcOirHiiiHiiiiiiiiiiiiliii ^ M length (mni.) J- ON-* Q\-:t OnJ- 0\-* On-* On-* On-* OnJ" On-* ON-d- CT\-* g>^ On-* H H OJ OJ on on^ ^ ua irwx) M3 C— l>-cO coaNONpOrHrHOJOJon P-ij- HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOJOJOJOJOJOJOJOJOJ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H H OJ OJ on m^ ^ irs u\\o \o f- t— co cOONONOOHHOJOJon m^ Hr-^HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHOJOJOJOJOJOJOJOJOJ 1 EH 22 (0 •rt 0) 0) J3 c o •H ■p p a >H V <1) +> 01 (11 d 'Ti •H > (11 -P oj ft pi fp CO ,Q •H 0) t>l h M d -P 0) •H CO (U T) •H ft ^ -d cfl H CO C) >3 0) C se ■H (U •v & ^ (U -p ^ o -(»VO on J- (jN(^0-d-v£) CTNcX) O\c0-* H H H C\J on^-* OOH H H o ON Lf\ EH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 H fo 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 rH 1 1 1 H S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -^ EH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H H P-H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H H 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • m EH llliilliiIlllHHHlCVJiiCVJiHHIIII ON f-H llilll IIHHHIIIIOJIHHIIII t-- S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I (M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OJ OJ EH 1 1 1 1 1 lCVlHCVlJ-u^J■-d•(J^(X)H^-vDu^J■mHO^t^(^H i i -* -* P-H 1 H iH C\J J- on J- J- MD cn^ o 0\ H -4- OJ i-H t— -^ (^J H 1 1 H H OJ H (^ J- -* Ol (>n -* OJ S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iCMio\cnLr\t~t~t~--:taDO(y\0jr^r-\ i i i H H -* c^roH (3N H H Bi H r-{ CJ^ rn a\ CO -:t 1^^ -^ a\ <''^Q\H "^ a\ (Si CO CM CM r-\ H CJ ooj-_J- onH H OJ OJ CVJ f^ 1 1 UAVC uAO^Lr^(^JVDc^Ou^Lr\OJHOJH-=t-=tH(^JH i i i I i I HLr>OU5-a3 cO ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 rH CO H 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 M i-i 1 1 1 1 1 ' ' OJ fc 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 ' ' H Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i i ■ i ' ' r-lf-lHCOHrHHp-lHiMH g £ 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 icyHHicvjcummirs^c— r-\£30c\JCTvONO\oojmc\jHi * i i i i' ' r-f rS r-{ H <-i •-{ i-i r-f H H g OJ ^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I OJ H m-^ cO^O[--OJHt-^(T\lJ^a^l^^cOOJ^-^^^-^-^-mo^^£)^ro^Hf^OJOJr^lt i i i i |l ' H OJ r^irwD lA^ mroOJH [^ 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 lOJHH'^t^-:t^-r^Jl/^lr^cr.Ol/^^P^OCOr^l^\COO-=^t^O^M^^-vC'^^onHHH i I I i i I' ' HWmmoJOJrHHH If; m M £ 1 1 I 1 t |(^rH0JgHt~-0Jp\O-:*J-0NH r^vD ^-a- t-- on^O OOvomi i^^cji i i i i |1 ' rH iH EH H 1 ^ OJ f^v£)a3 OD o irs-^ lA O OJCO O Oco -^ OJ rl ON-* Lf\ rnoncvj H i i i I i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i " H H W OJ H H lA h H 1 1 1 1 f^m^ OJOD f^r-l-=r C— iA,-|ONCOOJ-:Jt--rHVOHOJHOJI 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 |I ' r-J H H OJ fA3 I--CO rj OD lA,* f^H r^ 1 £ 1 1 IHWH'~IONONr^LfNOJLrNLrvOno\ A LA OiAQiAOiTsOLAOiAOiAOiAO LTNOLTvOiAOiAOiAO irvOiAOirvOirsOiAOLTsOiAOiAOirvOi-r* O ^^Cn OJ m m^ J- ir\ir\'O^Dt— r-coco 0\a\0 Or-(H OJOJm mj- ^ ialtsm^vd c~-t~-q3co onOnO OHi-IWOJCO mj- _4- irMTiTtL HHHMHrHHHHHHHHHHwKOJOlCJOJOJCJOJOJCJOJOJOJOJOJftOJWCUcnrntAc^cvirn 1 24 0\ H +> a < XI £ t (U o 0) fe; -d ■1 +> n () 01 a XI f) m s § « ai 0) c m iH 01 ja 01 fi 1 •H 0) J3 Ci3 > t^ ^^ o tH g tn ^ a 01 10 ^ i> o H H f-co vD CO f- ooco i i H i I H u^ ON >- u^ C\J m £ 1 1 1 1 IH 1 lCVJHH^O-*t— COCOHCOOVOOJI 1 I 1 I 1 m EH 1 I 1 1 iHH 1 iHCViirNir\t^mir\vot— ^/^vDO^-^oc\^- rnc\j i i i ih H H on on^ u>vo vo ^o -* on h H l/N li, 1 1 1 1 IH 1 1 1 1 1 l^/^^£lCT\^DonH-=^cOH onj- co o onn i i i i H HOJCvjonono^oncvJH o cy S 1 1 1 1 1 IH 1 IHHlTiOr-j^OS cn^^ HCO mj-ONHHIHI II 1 I CO EH 1 1 IH IH-=rOCT\cOcO-*Cvj|--MDt-ajJJ-J-OJ-CyOJ IH 1 1 1 1 1 1 cyj-v£)co C\JUAV£) onoNcoj- onoJH H f-l H H o li. 1 1 1 1 1 1 H f^'^ CO O H on r— t— H ON-=f cO-*-^-^HHlHi l 1 I I I H COJ-u-\MDf-t— u^-=t-aJHH Si S 1 1 IH iHonE^ir\ocoHONO\0\ir^ono^OVD IHH i i i i i i i i H on^3- t--S)cOmj- onc^HH CO LTN H EH HU^CVJJ^VOHIIHHIIIllllllllilillllilli ol (i. HCVJCVjmonHii lllllllllllllll! III1IIII H S imirHoniiiHHilllitiiiiillililiiiii o\ 1 J3 3 0) 1 H • Q Q i-{ r-i 04^ m m3 J- u-N uwo vo t— t-co coo\o\OOHHajCyon on3 j- i/> u^ CJCJC\JC\lcjC\JCVICJCOCvjCuCOCMCvJC\JCJCVjOJWCVlonono^o^ononrnonononono- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OLnoir\OLrNOi/NOLrNOLr\oifNOLf\oiJ^ou^OLnoirNOir\oi/NOi^Oi^ Kcjc3c3c\jCvlCVJCUWWCycjCVIOJCVicvlOj'wwSjonrn(?ir?ionononroroononon 1 25 ON S ^ M .-H OJ J- CO I^co ooco ID CI a i 5 n ^ •H 1 +j •H +> II n p H ■H Fi •V +> 9 to ?3 0) ^ 4-1 t) 13 II «l n k, c CI ^ 91 1 fl "l ^ n a .5 S^ I I I H cd •P o if^i 1 lHr^aJlJ•^t^J■^^u^o^^r^mJ•lr^^Ou^^-^-t^H^^ H H ro^ vo t^vo ON O O OS NO CO CO H <; CO tn ''111' 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 rH 1 1 H 1 ' OJ Pk 1 ( 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 f-H 1 t H 1 1 CM S 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 ■ t— ti lllll'''llilllllllHHOTi^lHHll H H fi, lllll'llll IllCJl-^IMrHIl CO s lllllllllllllillllHHHIIlllll oo VO Eh IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIILfNU^f—VD m^ rH i f^ I H fin I'liii iiiiiHr-oooooxic^iH OJ M .-1 VD NO 2 llllIllllllIllllllTNt/NVOONHlOJllll CO -* u-\ EH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iH J- ON-3- 0^1 CM ITN H LTN CM H 1 H CM CM on OJ H -* H Ph 1 1 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IrHCMu-NroONCOOurxCMHl •-\ ^ t-\ t-i S 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 ' ' lHtT-i[~-oooot^HI 1 1 1 H rH rH H H -* EH lllllllllllHIHIrH r- J- -d- 00 CO 1^ On-* I 1 I I H m PO J- CM H OJ CJN H FiH 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Ir-Hl 1 Ir-llCMONO-* mCO -d^ 1 1 1 1 o\ H H 21 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IH 1 It~-CM.*CM-*aiHI 1 1 1 1 H CM r-l H o^ EH I 1 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 1 1 ionromt--i/NONDVOCJN mNO H H H i i i H mcM CM rH H -* L/^ H P-H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o-| 1 CM-d- O rH CT\-* OJ UA rH H rH 1 1 1 H r-l H H H oo CO s 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 lmIO"nr^rHOu^^-L^^rHr^l i i i i i H CM H H 1^ C\) EH iCl 1 IHHCM l.JJ-rOr-1 f-CO -a-NONOCOiTNCM IH I ' I I 1 H r-l CM ro-d- POH OJ piK inOi 1 1 1 IHI 1 l-d-CMaDU^OOf^CM^-L/NHI 1 I I 1 1 1 H CM CM H CM H H S 1 1 1 1 IHHH lJ--d-ONC3NC:N cn\o m^ H 1 H I H H CM H H OJ H H H ti 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a P^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II ON s Ill'' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 a O EH I 1 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '' 1 1 1 1 1 1 c^ ol fe 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H H H s 1 '1 1 '■ 1 1 1 1 ' 1 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 CO ON c g 0) — . H ON-d- ON-d- ON-=f ON-d- ON-i"- O-d- ON-* ON-d- ON-d- ON.* C^N-* ON-* ON-* CJN-* H CM CM C^i m.* .* u> ITNVO ^ [~- t-00 COCnOnOOHHCMCMC^. m.* J- ITN CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMOJrorornrornonrornrnroro 1 1 i 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LrNOl/NOlPvOl^Ol/NOU^Ol/NOtTNOl^OLrNOLrNOL/NOLrNOirNO H CM CVJ oo ro^ .*u^^/^VDNDt^^-cococT^aNOOHHCMCM^o mj- j- itn CMCMOJCMOJCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMCVJcMCMrooomonropnmmmmro H EH 27 1 m ^^ a ^i 0) 0) ^4 ^ (Q >5 0) 0) O •^^ H ^ d cS CO dJ o (U (D iH S -H &i3^ ^ CVJ H C\J i 1 H J- I-- CM u-\ J- COCO CM VO on GJ H H H CM ro OOCM H H m VD CO H piH 1 1 I 1 1 CM OOCO I-- OO ^- u\^ CMi-lt^OOOOOHHCM 1 IH CM CO OnMD CO cm CO t— -d- CM H H H H H H O l/N ON s 1 1 I 1 UN l^- ITN LTMTN O On f-^ rH UA O^ t~- O^H I 1 1 1 1 CM ON CM CO M3 O C7N J- CM H H H r-i H H o H CJN H EH t-CT\HCMJ-^COHirNCMOOOOOOCMCM 1 IH 1 I 1 1 1 1 t—OOUAOOONOO t-t^-H OnLTN^ H r^ rH r-i H H H f^ LfNC—l/NVDONONOOOJt-ONOCOOOLrNHCM 1 IH 1 1 1 1 1 1 oo ITNCO ITN OO^ CO CO OO J- CM CM CM oo s CM O J- -d- O CM J- OO CO CO CO l^ t-- ITN H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J- C— VD [-- LfNj CO CO t— LTN CM H VD ON LTN O EH Ot— CM|IHII1IIIIIIIII1<'<<'' CM oo s Pr^ J- ITN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 < > H H ^ S VOCMCMllHIIIIIIIIIIllll''''! CM •^ -P -a- •H t • OnCTNQNCKCTNONC^OnOnOnCTnONONCTnCTNONON ONONCTNONC3NC3NC7NONO H CM co^ LTNMD f-CO ON Q H W COJ- LTNVp CM OOJ- irwo I--CO CT\H HHHHHHHHHCMCOCMaJCMOJOJ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I oooooooooopooooooooopoooo CM onj- LTNMD t^co ON O H CM OO^ t/\VD t^CO c:n p H CM OOJ- UNVD HHHHHHHHHHCMCMCMCMCMCMCM • H 28 ^ si Ti o (I) 01 d 6 m (1) 0) -p ^ (U o Tl +> 03 •p o o d (1) £3 CO ■l-l g m 1 s (U (1) to to § Xi P< o •H g ^ o > a ll o a . -p o () d +> lU C) II & (U H ^ 0) -P ^ a F ■H 11 H .5 y 1 1 ^ 2 C 4) P< P< H f^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 •! 1 rH 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 rH S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I < I > O ro EH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 H 1 1 mn HIIIIlllHHI ON Ph llllllllHIHllHHHllllIIIHi-IIIIIIII t- " a 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 C\J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ OJ W EH 1 1 lCMJ■$7>2i2> ooooooooopooooooooopoooooooooQOQ ^^ mS ^« oso ^ a m^ u^vo ^^« ON J^ j^ 8 m^ u.^ ^« gj^^f^i^^ EH 29 < 1^ 0) i) ■p ^ at Tl Tl ?! ■P o c m ai CQ ^ (fl 6 a il •3 O 0> Si H n* w n to ;S a 3 •H 71 r: •H f) •H 1 t u +> +> Q ■ 3 Eh !>, ^ tJ V C V Vl b ■ 5 □ 1 --;5a3^s3g^^^g^^S|;g,§^gg^^s^|g^Sg^^s^^K^5S?^f^3S>^8» << On B 1 1 1 t 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 ( I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I < I >) I i (■<> I b 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 £ t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OS EH 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ) I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 &, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 E 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I i • I t- EH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 6< 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 VD EH lllllillllllllilllllllllllllllllHlHlHi-ilHlCJIHOJH [«. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 S lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIlli-IIHHIHiCMlHrHH UA Eh llllllllllltllllllllllllllHllHlllHlHl'-IHHtllHlCU (=. lllllIIIIIIIIIIIIlllllllllllli-lllllltlHIHIllHIH H llllllllillllllllllllllltlHIIIIIiHiHIIHIIIItlH -^ &H lllllllllllllllllltlllllr-4HllCgC\imOJHltOJlHllt-d-rHOJH^ t. lllllllllltlllllllllllllHHiliHHIHlllHllltllHHiHCVJ s III 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 r-1 H mn HI IrHlHI 1 I-J-IHICU ro EH 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 iHIHC\lcy-=rC\JCJLi-\OJCO u~s-d- CO roOJirNii^r-ia\VOJ-'^Da\V£iJ-co 0\ 0\-=t ir\\r\t~ CT\ H HHHHCVJ HrH H b liiiliillilllllH'-(H-:tiC\J POCO j^ mir\ir\ iri^ vd On t^ cnao J- H l/^-3■ lf\ OJ on t-- u^ O CT\ H aj_5-^ u^t-CJiTN^ Ht-CT\ONC-vS cOt-^-=t- OJOJO CT\00 CO \o t-ir\-d- J- r?SH H N H H ■^ ^^cyn^mmromojcvjHHHHHH fc 1 1 I lOJHHJ-OOJomMr\onHHOJ\OOJ roco VO»\0O-JVOQQ i-+"-:t rj CO CO CO VO ifWO LTN-^ m C^_d- fO CO W H r4 H S 1 1 1 1 1 1 mo roco Hr-tC^W^iJ^Lr\C7\r^t— mco ONt-H ir\voHir\Qir\vDOH^ ir\co v£> OJ a\ h--* md r--\o W H H H cO C\l mt- 0\-4- t-CONCO U>riOcOVD\OU^t--4--5-^-* mo^ffJHHH i-IrHCQHHi-tr-lH H EH Hu^-^ 0^<^JOnocOcO COu^CTNMDt^OCOCOrH t- 0\V0 romiTNj-HroCJl lOJrHHCMl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HCVJ-d--^COCTN-^ONON^Wt-vOCnCVJr-^OJ H H H H H r-i H p^ 1 1 MD O OJ m cn\D Q-:tOHWHt-^Oc0^vOJ-OJirNHWmiHH 1 1 1 IHCVJI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H W rH J- -d- vi5 t- C^CO ^O^ CM CVJ H H H s 1 m0J0NWC0-:tOt-C0V0c0-:tVDm0JOLP,rH ir\^ CO OjmrHHWHIlOJHI 1 1 1 1 III 1 1 II 1 1 HfHmirvCOrjaNC0vZ)POmr-(H rA 4- •H H 1 30 0> V IB ■♦-' i ^ I § I i i I ? I H O e i 4 J. CO a J? " 1 af?S«'8!«Si'&3S5^«S5!-aR«Kd'^°^^aS'"'"-' ■ ,HH ...,,■, .H ® s o\ e< 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 H I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OJ fr. 1 I 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 H 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H z 1 1 1 I I 1 I I I i 1 I H 1 I t 1 1 t t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H CO El 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OJ fe 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 I 1 1 t 1 1 : t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t H I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 I 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H r^ H 1 1 H 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 r-l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 I I ■ I 1 1 1 > I I 1 1 1 1 1 u* b. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I <-* Z IIHIlllllllr-lllllllllHllllllllllllllllllllllllll ^ U3 EH HCJHH^OJCMOJ-d- CTN^ CVJ O m_:f mv£) O-tmOJHOJtfNO-iiHI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IHHI 1 1 1 1 1 1 IH ^ Pb rtlCJHi lHHir^P^<^i^OJmoi^a\n-iHHHJA(^iHl I i i IHHI I I I i i i ir< ?; Z 1 1 iH-^HHOJHU}rnCJVCHHHC\i^iHlHl II II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 S; ITN ei r.J OJ H J- n-)CT\^ l/\cO iTNCA^ rj C7n-^-=|- -4- u^H f'^OJ m.^ POO! H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i r 1 1 m Ph WOJHCJHf^ iHOJmmmuMr\CUm ro.^ fHOJOJromojOJHl I I i I I I I i I i i II i 1 I I i I i ^ z i 1 lOJClVO-*-d-VDOJU3 cn\o ^OJi-(HHlHllHHIllllllllllllllllll|lll s J- Eh ^ t^^H OCO Of^fH f-CO C\J U\Jt rjrj-*rj-*Cy_*HW-*CUHHl 1 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 t^ » b. cnjit r^inj- CM ooh U> ir\ rovo ost— ^osOJo^-*0J-*i-4OJ-4-OJHHi i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i 3: z m 0^ mvD vo*^ t--v£) lf\Oj li^^O^ t— UNCJ CVJ W i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i t i I i i i 1 (V) EH tArjco CT\0-*irvmoNHco b- t---st ^mojrncvjiHiiiHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ^ Eb r< r-f if\ LTNco O ir\ cn t—^D US US C^ cn m r^ CM CO C4 t H t 1 IHI 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 g Z ^ o m^ OJ^iiCvjirsmcMLrvr-trHCJiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiiiiiiiitiiii § OJ EH ^-inHf^HCViCVJlCUHilf^^lHOJIHr-llllllllllll Il|lllltl1il -^ 5 h. j^-oOHCMHCViCVJir-fii lOJiHOiiiHli II ii ■ II 1 ■ iltl i il i Z mCJlHlillHHIIHllllHlllllllllllllillllllllllllIlt § H EH 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 t , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 h 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 t 01 S Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t CO § s a s^S' R® p§ g; » 3 a ?^ sf R® p§ 8; & 3 » s^j^ R® PS- g^ » s a ^3" ?;® PS s; & s R (Pis' R® CS lA ITS uMTMA u\ if\u\ if\\£ \d \o \o^\o\o^'^\o ^--^-t--^-^-^-t^h-^-^-a5cooocoGocococo^5co 0\O^O^O^C^C^C^ ir\ Irs vMTMrt trs us us irs ir\o..^4=-^^^^coco^oKf^i;&;^£^ViS'S''r^"^'^^yi-SSR^i;i2'g■i:^t::^o . M . . . . ■ 2 ro H-p-rorov/iro—ivjiH ovcd^ji rouj ro vo'l^u) 'Jo wlij vB*^ ronj ^cooNvJifoijPcD-jrotv)! i i i i i i •^ ^ _^ h'^ HHHrororouj-F' -p'vji a\-j on on ct\ on cr\ ^r-ui uj js'uo tjo uj rv) h ro -p-u 4:-0Dvjn (--vo ONO CKuj t^vi ^ro-j --iL^ ou) vo ON 1 03-J 1 i i i i i i i i i i i 1^ HHHroHI-'HHHH H On— J ODUJ v/l0N-p'Ovjir0VDUJSJl--]r000-P'Hr0.I h-*HI HI 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 2 •p- ro H M H M -P" O VJl -^ 03—] 03V1U) ■P'UILO rOHcorOHIItHIIIIHIIIlllllllllllll >») 03 H ODCoro*^HODOvncoCDCDKOcoo\ONroroi Hroi f-"! i hi i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ^3 ro fo -p'co ODNJi HLON/iujON-JHHroiroHi i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i ■ i i ■ ■ i i 2 VJl ON ONU) coHullOooHrorOIHHHIIII.llllllHIIIIIIIIIlIlllill •^ H y-- H H !-• CO co—i ONvo ou) ononvh CD—i rorocoiroHiiiiiiiHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 1^ 0N\0 H ^Jl \0 ON 4^ ON Jr-vn VnONHrOIICOIIIIIIIIIIlllIll 1 2 On ONa>4::'-P'-l=-rOU0COrOllllilllllllHIIIIII|llllll|l||||ll ■^ H H H H ro--)^nvocoa3--]^ON\jiNjioNHroi itoi i t ihi i i i i i i i i i i t i i i i i i i i i 1-3 t-'K>l--IHi^l-'HHHHh' Illlllllllllllllllll 2 -J HIHHHItoHIIIIIIIHIIIIltllll lllllll •^ rororoHrocoLoroHHHHiiiHii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii H 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 2 CD 1 1 ■ I 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 '^ 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 h3 > 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 ^ I 1 > 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 >^ ■ I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H "^ S'~^ S::^"7i-^ o\ONNJi-4 on^n/ivh on-j onctn^ ODOo-g— i-j-ovncouj -p-cj cooo to h -I ON -J ojon -e-ONN/i 4:- -J ro -1 NJi 4=- j^-no v/i &-I -p- o u) ui on 4:- ro H*S^-j rou) ro *-u) vn 4=-p-ro H on H H E I h3 H I rt- 1 o o" 0 P> CO 2. r? B (Q 3 3 O O -^ S p. B- c+ > (D c+ H 3 a e+ fD H* 32 01 T) o (1) ^ <) p •H n) -P -p n A Tf -p •P <: <) a fi % (0 E5 rf- ?> 91 CO J3 +3 ■9 (5 •H O § 111 a ^ 01 Hh en en 0) C CQ <^ H =1 Pi H tn -P o +> •H 4-' II 0 p H h fll to •H ■^ 3 i >^ Hh I (U p< 1 r- f-VDOD t^VO l^VO U>^ ^D -=t- J- m (v^ PO r^rH OJ H H ^>">' s„ v-j u > . . iv, ^i, rn ^h rH so g^ << a\ Eh 1 1 1 I rH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H li. ■ ■■<■>> 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II, 1 S 1 1 1 1 r-) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,,,,, , H CO EH IIIHIIIIIIIHHIIHIIIHHIIHIHHIIIIIIIIIIIII S Ii| IIIHIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIHHIIIIHH Illlfll f- a l>l<>IIIIIIHIIIHIIIllllr-llll IIII1 ^ t— EH 1 OJ 1 ^ H oj m^ irwD t~- CM ooooi/N mvo ir\ on t^ ON OO^ QJ;J;^Cir\J;ONOVOCMt-lXM/NI^CVJJ-pnCUJ-HHHH I 1 1 1 1 IH H HH HHHCvJHHHHH H H CM s r- t— OJ ONco ooo cT\ t-co H J- ^ ir\ CM c\j mcy CM OJ H i i i i i i i i i i i H r-i r-i r-i O o! ir\ EH CMro LTNJ; 0\cq f-cq t— C^ rOCJN-* COt-CMt^mf-olHCMOJHHHH 1 ICJHH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CMHCMHHHHH HH H H M3 s Ph LPvcO O ir% o CM mvD l/N-d- O CO ON ir\_d- OU^OJ\OCMHCMCMHHHH 1 ICMHH 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 r~i t-\ r-\ t-^ t~i t-i r-i H § S t^Ol^OC7NNO-:d-OJCMUNcnHU^mooCMCMHH I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 H H H 3 J- EH iO<5>. S -i-S •#. ifNU^CO^t-OONt- ro\o u^HCMonHHIOJllliiiiiiiiiiiii CM OJ S m OJ OJ H H H H H H •A fi. CJN t~- UNop vo CJN o -=t- J- H ^ o CO J- m ir\ J- H CM m H H i oj i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i hhhcmhhhhhi-Ihh S VD H LPvlnCD ITvl^H-* rOH IHmiHH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 m EH CM \0 IP> CO VO CM >^-=t- J- H OOH 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H H (JH VD ^ U^VO ^i3 CM V£) cn^ HCOHIIIHIIIIllllHllllllllllllltl g S LTNOIIOJIIIHIIIIIIIIIIII Iltiilllllllll CJ EH HlHHHICMIIIIlililiiiillililtiltlliliiiiit o (i. HIHHIlCMIIllllilllilllllllllllllllllltlli o! S I 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lA CO H EH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 cd fe 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CM H S I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ON ■P ?^<& 8^ & 3' a ^5> K® p^s g^ & 3 a ^5> K® ^^S' §^ g s a ?^s> K© g^S' g^ & S" a ^s> R>s ir\irMr\VOVDVOVON£)M3KON0^5MD t^t— ^-t--[^^-c^t^c— t^cocococococoaDcococo 0\ '^H-* H H H 1 H 1 1 1 1 H 1 m 1 1 1 H 1 CIH CM iii)(irirrr>lltrlit 1 i lA EH , 1 1 , 1 1 ( 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T 1 1 r 1 r 1 1 1 t t I t r I t t t t 1 t II Px 1,1,1,11,1111 111,11 1 1 I'l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 m S 1,1,11,11111111111,111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -d- EH 1,1 Ill,,,,, 1 1 1 1 1 1 r^ 1 1 r I r^ 1 1 H r li. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 11 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r^ 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 H 1 Rt a •H d ^5 X 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , I ,, I , 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r I f 1 1 ■-< 1 I 1 1 m EH 1, iiiliiii liiiiilH>HnilHr-IH t^^ »< 1 1 1 1 , 1 ,, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 CI 1 X , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , , 1 , , 1 , , 1 1 I 1 i 1 1 1 H > X -* m\0 Os^O Of^rOMHiiititlliilllittl»lllllllliilll<*«l<<< 4- 1 ° 3 8 ^ RS RS §-8 ^ § g.5 RS gg gg g § g.S g^ ^,g g§^§i^^gli^S,S R;.|^^i^ 8^1^!^ 34 +> 0) o -p tD s ■a {^ ^ CJ 4) h S 0) m o C 8 lU tQ 5 +3 <) m -P 8 It •H +3 H ^ •i i 3 « >. a Ix^ & OJ u i |1 •^ S I I ^ H tA^s-^a'Ra^.K^^s^'^afjf&f^s^^rt&a^RJSS""^-^'"^™^'^ ""•^' ■-•' ■ '^ '^ 1 OD B 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 rH I 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 rH 1 1 C\J Px 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I H I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H 1 1 Cvj £ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■ t- EH IIIIIIllHIrHIHIHlWIlHIIHHIrHIIIIIIIrHIIIIIllIII ^ pt. 1 ililHIHIHllHIIrHHIHIllllllHllllIIltll CO S llllllllHlrHlllllrHlllIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIlllllllll m ^ EH iH IHHrHC\JHU^U^MD-:tr-mmHMDVOOrjLr\t-OOVDH-4-n-)pHHrH IH 1 IHH 1 1 1 1 1 IrH 1 1 li. 1 I I 1 1 1 1 It^HIHH 1 IVDCyoOCO l/MAir\VO HJ-rOHrHHlrHI IrHHI 1 1 1 1 IHI 1 Vi3 S H tHHHOJHU^CM U^ J- VOOJCOHIJ-CVimiCJCJIIIIIIllllllllIIIIIIlI 3 ITN EH 1 1 1 H C\J H ON LTN iTvVD \D'^ a\ 0\-=J- O ONOD CO vo CO ^ ITN OO-^ HWHHWIIIIIIIHIIIIIH rH b 1 1 1 1 1 1 H H H rH rH 1 H IJ^OD ^0 vo VO J- uM--=f -=J- tnj- H OJ rH H H I 1 I 1 I 1 I H 1 1 1 1 1 H £ 1 1 1 rH CM HCC J' -=f l/M/N\0 to J^ VO^ COCM J^ H H 1 rH I I 1 1 1 I rH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H -^ EH 1 OJJ■^J-=^■r>^IMJ•l/^cDlr^o\l/^wcy^t--C^Joo tn>4D o m^ iHHCiiltHillllillllll HrHrHrH l^^^HH H OJ - 3 PH 1 I IrH irOOJ^r— m^LfM^COOC\JVOOC^ rOVD >■ < a £ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 ^ 1' ti s g^ & 9 a R^s- R® g^s^ §^ & 3 » ^f K® g^S' §^ & g a s^s- s^s p^ 8^ & s a i?^^ K® ps^ g; s 3 Sg83a^isS^Sg8Sa^i^®^s48Sa^i^SRSg8S8|>|^^ EH 35 Appendix Table 11. — Mean fork length and weight in samples from purse-seine catches, South Atlantic Area, excluding North Carolina fall fishery, 1957 (Numbers of fish in parentheses) PORK LENGTH (Trnri.) Age Males Females Both sexes 0 1 2 3 .... 128.7 (31) 167.5 (601) 188.7 (912) 2i^l.O (1) 129.0 (29) 166.6 (536) 190.8 (951) 210.7 (3) 128.8 (60) 167.0 (1137) 189.8 (1863) 218.2 (h) WEIGHT (g.) 0 3h.'? (31) 30.2 (29) 32.i+ (60) •X. • • • • 83.2 (596) 82.4 (532) 82.8 (1128) 2 113.8 (910) 119.2 (950) 116.6 (i860) 3 ..-. 251.0 (1) 170.0 (3) 190.2 (k) Appendix Table 12. — Mean fork length and weight in samples from purse-seine catches, Chesapeake Bay Area, I957 (Numbers of fish in parentheses) FORK LENGTH (mm.) Age Males Females Both sexes 0 160.0 (3) 156.8 (8) 157.6 (11) 1 182.0 (IOU6) 178.5 (1^6U) 180.0 (2510) 2 222.2 (197) 220.1 (2i+3) 221.0 (hko) 3 .-.• 217.5 (2) 22i^.i+ (7) 222.9 (9) k .... 267.0 (1) 267.0 (1) 5 .... - 252.0 (1) 252.0 (1) WEIGHT (g.) 0 .... 73-3 (3) 66.2 (8) 68.2 (ri) 1 101.8 (I0i;6) 93.2 (ikGk) 96.8 (2510) 2 171. J+ (197) 170. i+ (2U3) 170.8 (1^0) 3 161.0 (2) 187.0 (7) 181.2 (9) (1) h .... _ _ 257.0 (1) 257.0 5 .... - 327.0 (1) 327.0 (1) 36 Appendix Table I3. — Mean fork length and weight in samples from purse-seine catches. Middle Atlantic Area, 1957 (Numbers of fish in parentheses) FORK LPINGTH (mm.) Age Males Females Both sexes 1 199.2 (718) 200.1 (682) 199.6 (lUoo) 2 239.2 (2291) 2i+1.6 (2339) 21^0. if (k630) 3 .... 275.5 (180) 282.7 (209) 279 A (389) h .... 303.8 (108) 312.6 (1U9) 308.9 (257) 5 .... 309.^ (58) 316.6 (75) 313.5 (133) 6 .... 310.7 (h7) 321.7 (59) 316.8 (106) 7 .... 311.5 {h) 282.0 (1) 305.6 (5) 8 .... 321.0 (1) 327.0 (1) 32^^.0 (2) 9 .... 328.0 (1) 326.0 (1) 327.0 (2) WEIGHT (g.) 1 II+7.7 (718) 150.7 (682) 1I4.9.2 (ii+oo) 2 252.5 (2291) 261.6 (2338) 257.1 (^629) 3 .... 1^08.8 (180) U46.3 (209) 1^28.9 (389) k .... 559.0 (108) 611.2 (li+9) 589.2 (257) 5 .... 58U.2 (58) 625.9 (75) 607.7 (133) 6 .... 580.1^ (1+7) 653.6 (59) 621.1 (106) 7 .... 557.5 (h) 622.0 (1) M+3.0 (1) 53^.6 (5) 8 .... 639.0 (1) 630.5 (2) 9 .... 662.0 (1) 605.0 (1) 633.5 (2) 37 Appendix Table Ik. — Mean fork length and weight in samples from purse-seine catches. North Atlantic Area, I957 (Numhers of fish in parentheses) FORK LENGTH (mm.) Age Males Females Both sexes 1 222.1 (9) 215.1 (12) 218.1 (21) 2 26U.O (585) 268.6 (521) 266.2 (1106) 3 •••• 287.0 (2UU) 296.2 (270) 291.8 (51U) i^ .... 30i+.o (265) 313.^ (356) 309. U (621) 5 .... 312.3 (197) 321.0 (?]1) 316.8 (U08) 6 .... 315.1 (211) 22k. k {31k) 320.7 (525) 7 .... 317.1^ (hi) 325.6 (58) 322.2 (99) 8 .... 328.8 (h) 316.7 (7) 321.1 (11) 9 .... 332.0 . (1) - 332.0 (1) WEIGHT (g.) 1 200.0 (9) 182. i+ (12) 190.0 (21) 2 3^^3-0 (585) 362.0 (521) 352.0 (1106) 3 .... Ui,i,.l (2U3) i+95.5 (270) U7I.2 (513) k .... 529.0 (265) 593.6 (355) 566.0 (620) 5 .... 573.6 (196) 639.0 (210) 607. U (1^06) 6 .... 592.0 (210) 669.7 (312) 638. U (522) 7 .... 618. 3 (Ul) 689.9 (58) 660.2 (99) 8 .... 69^+. 5 W 712. i+ (7) 705.9 (11) 9 .... 612.0 (1) - 612.0 (1) 38 Appendix Table 15.--Mean fork length and weight in samples from purse -seine catches. North Carolina fall fishery, I957 (Numbers of fish in parentheses) FORK LENGTH (mm.) Age Males Females Both sexes 0 129 A (98) 129.0 (111) 129.1 (209) 1 178.9 (20) I8I+.9 (9) 180.8 (29) 2 280.9 (112) 289.0 (112) 285.0 (22U) ^ 297.6 (71) 306.8 (83) 302.5 (15^) k .... 308.2 (73) 317.1 (119) 313.7 (192) 5 .... 3II+.2 (71) 32i+.0 (76) 319.2 (IU7) 6 .... 31^.7 (kQ) 327.2 (66) 321.9 {llh) 7 .... 311.0 (3) 327.1 (8) 322.7 (11) 8 .... - - 33^.5 (2) 33^.5 (2) WEIGHT (g.) 0 35.7 (98) 35.0 (111) 35.3 (209) 1 88.8 (20) 105.0 (9) 93.8 (29) 2 ii29.8 (112) U7U.0 (112) ii51.9 (22U) 3 .... 512. i^ (71) 563.9 (83) 51^0.1 (I5i+) k .... 561.8 (73) 632.8 (119) 605.8 (192) 5 .... 600.5 (71) 668.7 (76) 635.8 (1U7) 6 .... 596.6 (U8) 682.0 (66) 6U6.0 (lli+) 7 .... 596.0 (3) 688.9 (8) 663.5 (11) 8 .... - 783.5 (2) 783.5 (2) 39 GPO 806239 MS'fiSr''"'- 5 WHSE OiSl