Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. Do WEP awtMEN El Or AGRICULTURE, BUREAU OF CHEMISTRY—BULLETIN No. 94. H. W. WILEY, Chief of Bureau. StUDIES ON APPLES. 1. SToRAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. Il. INsoLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES OR Marc. Ill. Microscopic anp Macroscopic Examt- NATIONS OF APPLE STARCH. BS W. D. BIGELOW, H. C. GORE, AND B. J. HOWARD, OF THE BUREAU OF CHEMISTRY. tit isin By ] Ny aA PY PT Isa! W's Tee ih =a Pl ll WASHINGTON : PRINTING je) Uae GOVERNMENT OFFICE. FEUER OF SR ANSMIT TAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, BUREAU OF CHEMISTRY, Washington D. C., April 12, 1905. Str: I have the honor to transmit herewith the manuscript of a report on some studies made in the division of foods and in the micro- chemical laboratory of this Bureau on the development of apples, espe- cially under different conditions of storage, and to recommend the publication of the same as Bulletin No. 94 of the Bureau of Chemistry. This investigation has been in progress for the past two years, and some preliminary work was done prior to that time by Mr. J. 5. Burd. The work was originated, planned, and directed by Mr. W. D. Bige- low, chief of the division of foods. The analytical and bibliographical data should be, for the most part, accredited to Mr. H. C. Gore, though Mr. E. M. Chace and Mr. W. L. Dubois participated in the analytical work. The third section of the report, comprising the microscopic studies, photographs of the fruit, and the specific gravity determinations, is entirely the work of Mr. J. B. Howard, chief of the microchemical laboratory. The investigation has been made in collaboration with Messrs. William A. Taylor and G. Harold Powell, of the office of pomological investigations, Bureau of Plant Industry, who have selected and pro- cured the samples and furnished facilities for their transportation and cold storage. They havealso taken an active interest in planning the work and discussing its results, and have furnished all of the pomo- logical data. Very respectfully, Jal Me \ivisnsie, Clogs Hon. JAMES WILSON, Secretary of Agriculture. CO Nala N GTS: Page. I. Storage, respiration, and growth......-.--- To 5 eh Ge a Ee, Sees 9 Review of work on the ripening and respiration of fruits -......---. 9 hemipening olapples im common storagess2=-2. 2 2.2... 22222222 Se 20 Weseripwon-ot the vanieties-analyzed--= Se. 2 22. f ees ee 20 DWeseriptionandsanalyses olsampless 2545. St eS: 72) Wiscussionuoisvanahyirealedutas ae eee he eee ee he ie 24 Rhewripeninesohapplesaunicoldistorages: =. Sao dl RESIS Oley SES: et eer he om ee Ge I oe sh 32 Results with samples taken out of cold storage.....-.---------- 39 The respiration of apples in common and cold storage......-------- 40) Description of apparatus and methods employed.-....-.--.---.- 40 Resuliscal respiration expemments <2. 2. 24 2b 2 ne Pts Se 42 Teiay ss ve O alae Cae 0) DCS ee eS ie i eee ee 44 Results of consecutive analyses of growing apples..-.---------- 45 Discussion of changes occurring during growth -.....---------- 46 CHIC MoeoleamelGiomet tere srt reese eS vole OS So ee 65 Mie Ain soliiple-carhoimycnrates Or MALC. 22-25 ee Bd gaa ee eet en Re 67 IBCeuIne Oelieserm tte. aan a, Seen tense e osme ote Pe oe 67 PAR SEONG NG ROMIE Ware ee ena eR eS e AGS ia i Sw SSL 67 Comments on the problems mvolvedia 2.05.52. 55- 62-5 - - +e 86 PARAS CoO PLE LINER aot: > yep ee Sean mney aie Se cd i 2 kc. ed 87 auc ULONIGO fe SATIN |) LC Near eee eee se ie MeN eee Ny aoe ND) 87 RRCOULES EOSIN LYSIS 2 -Mt=s Ampere meaner eal ok ae 88 111. Microscopic and macroscopic examinations of apple starch.-.....------. 89 LESSORS TOME GT OCs ei gat Se eS ty > 8) Let RIP Se eee a 89 SHAE CHE SUITE Mees EMI ONS poe he So Mo 0 er eR ee ee 89 Veakening of cell walls and increase of intercellular air... ---- 92 11 Lx STPTST To OPT 0 CRS a eae te pa PINE Regn a en ae ey SS 94 ‘| OH SLOWING Pe 8 a Aap ed aahaiy us nc 7B A aie en mR me Oc em 94 Grameen, Steve CI COMbeni eee nis sya eee eS 95 TULA STIG) TST eee ye ane SI al. SR sted eg Re le ERSTE, NS he ae 98 2 RED 1 SURO Ta Gale] 01 We See ee a lt a aeRO, 2 ol ONE DA ik pe ete ad 100 ,¥ | : > ; . . eae . " 7 , F * S ; . a - } . j | I / ; - i ade iP re ‘ oe fe sy Sieh ae ae aes ILLUSTRATIONS. PLATES. Piate I. Fig. 1.—Apple tissue, showing starch in apple cells. Fig. 2.—Apple Fic. SINGIN Sn SOE SE Ih Se ES Oe eR eee Il. Location and gradual disappearance of apple starch—Winter Para- GISen (HOUR eswl= GO) ere ae te ee ene er ON ee 2 III. Location and gradual disappearance of apple starch—Ben Davis (fig- IBS cig esc Joe rghit eee reer Re Dena eek ely es os ae a | IV. Location and gradual disappearance of apple starch—Huntsman “J 15. 14. 15. (TE GATIRES AON Se eae ie Ee eles ER ea VY. Location and gradual disappearance of apple starch—Yellow Trans- PREC Hes (OCR CSS io), ea rere pee GE rey IS SS SS oes Sa the TEXT FIGURES. Chart showing results of analyses of Rhode Island Greening apples in COMIUMOMESLOTAC CE ayers hs eyed we oe dou oe otek Chart showing results of analyses of Northern Spy apples in common EOE LO Crs Semen serene irony va A Nera Re Sec SS Soli SS 2 eke ea Chart showing results of analyses of Winesap apples in common SUOEAG Cer ety aia eny seer ar oy eee wee ee a UEP Seok Chart comparing results of analyses of three varieties of apples in common storage Chart showing results of analyses by C. A. Brown, jr., of Baldwin ap PLCSeta COMMON USCOLAG Cee es ae owe ES eS Chart showing results of analyses by Kulisch of apples stored at cellar temperature -..-- Brera tns tener MENG ere EL yo Ie es Chart showing results of analyses of Ben Davis apples picked August 15, 1902, and kept under varying conditions of storage ....-------- Chart showing results of analyses of Ben Dayis apples picked Sep- tember 15, 1902, and kept under varying conditions of storage -..-- Chart showing results of analyses of Winesap apples picked August 15, 1902, and kept under varying conditions of storage --...-..---- Chart showing results of analyses of Winesap apples picked Septem- ber 15, 1902, and kept under varying conditions of storage emetisedsem respirationvexpeniments 2 -82..4.cc > fos Ses 22s | Se Chart comparing results of analyses of Ben Davis apples used in res- piration experiments and kept in cold storage and at cellax tem- perature Chart showing chemical changes in summer apples ( Early Strawberry ) during growth Chart showing chemical changes in summer apples (Bough) during BAUME Be ten eae ee at es 2 ee eS ee ee Chart showing chemical changes in summer apples (Yellow Trans- parent) during growth Fig. 16. 17; 18. Ligh 25. ILLUSTRATIONS. Chart showing average chemical changes during growth in the three summer yarieties: 2. o2 2225-4. s- eee Ce AE sae a ee Chart showing chemical changes in winter apples (Ben Davis) during Chart showing chemical changes in winter apples (Huntsman) during prowthys so) tect ions. ee oo 2 Chart showing chemical changes in winter apples (Winter Paradise) during erowth .....--.------- 33222 . Chart showing average chemical changes during growth of the three winter varieties :.-....2.2-22. 5.2203 SS eee Page. Chart showing chemical changes during growth of summer apples ~ (Early Strawberry )—in grams per apple-....- eLearn eee . Chart showing chemical changes during growth of summer apples (Bough )—in grams per apple-..-.----- Jot snhes ket Oe ees . Chart showing chemical changes during growth of summer apples (Yellow Transparent)—in grams per apple: —2 22252 asso] - ses eee . Chart showing average chemical changes during growth of the three varieties of summer apples—in grams perapple-.--.-.-------.---- Chart showing chemical changes during growth of winter apples ( Ben Davis)—in grams per apple... 2... 32s ass] . Chart showing chemical changes during growth of winter apples (Huntsman )—in grams per apple - 2222 22 Sass eee eee ee Chart showing chemical changes during growth of winter apples (Winter Paradise)—in grams per:apple: 22 222222 eee Chart showing average chemical changes in the three varieties of winter apples examined—in grams per apple..---..-------------- . Chart showing results of analyses of growing apples by Lindet—in percentages of total solids.........- ud RG Bek pee ee . Cross section of apple, showing structure and location of parts... .--- STUDIES ON APPLES. I. STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. REVIEW OF WORK ON THE RIPENING AND RESPIRATION OF FRUITS. In the following résumé of works on this subject, the review of Gerber” has been used as a guide to the French memoirs on the subject. The earliest source available in the original was the paper of Bérard.? This author carried on elaborate researches on the ripening and res- piration of fruits, his results apparently contradicting those of De Saussure,° whose conclusions were considered not to be sufficiently well established by experiments, De Saussure having put forth the idea that green fruits act like leaves toward. the atmosphere surround- ing them, in light or darkness. Bérard studied the effect produced by unripe strawberries and many other unripe fruits on the air surrounding them by keeping them for twenty-four-hour periods in air in large flasks sealed by mercury. He found in all cases an increase of carbon dioxid at the expense of oxygen, and in no case the reverse change. Similar experiments were tried on fruits still attached to the tree (apricots, peaches, and plums), with the result that the fruit did not mature, but became withered and browned, showing apparently that oxygen is necessary for the ripening of fruits. Experiments are also described in which fruits were kept for long periods of time in inert gases—carbon dioxid, hydrogen, or nitrogen, and in vacuo. These experiments were not considered successful, for it was found that the fruit lost its odor and acquired a disagreeable taste. In the second contribution” methods for the analysis of fruits are presented, and analyses given of many fruits when green and when ripe, viz, apricots, currants, cherries, plums, peaches, and pears. De Saussure“ confirmed his previous work, published in 1804, by a report of new experiments, which differ widely in their results from “ Annales des sciences naturelles, 1896 (8), 4: 1. 6 Ann. chim. phys., 1821 (2), 16: 152, 225. ¢ Recherches chimiques sur la yégétation, Paris, 1804. @Ibid., p. 225. ¢Ann. chim. phys., 1821 (2), 19: 1438, 225. 10 STUDIES ON APPLES. those of Bérard.“ The air in which the fruit was kept was examined at shorter intervals than in the experiments of Bérard, and this may account for the disagreement of their results, though De Saussure believed that the glass containers used by Bérard were too small, so that crowding or overheating may have taken place. De Saussure reiterated that green (unripe) fruits act on the air like leaves, differing only in intensity of action, which is less in the ease of fruits. During the night oxygen disappeared and was replaced by carbon dioxid, which was partly absorbed by the fruit, absorption being less in free than in confined air. The fruits consumed, volume for volume, more oxygen in the dark when they were very green than when they approached maturity. On exposure to sunlight they gave off part or all of the oxygen of the carbon dioxid which they had absorbed in darkness, and used up all the carbon dioxid from the atmosphere in which they were inclosed. Green fruits could even remove the carbon dioxid from an atmosphere artificially charged with several per cent of the gas. Couverchel’ contributed two papers of much interest, in which the ideas of several early writers on the subject are given. These ideas were founded largely on theory rather than on experiment. From the early work of Sennebier are quoted the following items of interest: The fruits which have yellowed in ripening are more succulent than green fruits, are nearer decay, are more gummy than resinous, and are more soluble in water. Perhaps the phlogiston may have less energy because it is more attenuated, the fiber loosens, the mass of the fruit increases, etc. Sennebier supposed that the fruit suffered a loss in phlogiston (corresponding to a gain in oxygen). Ina later work he says: ** The taste of fruits, at first bitter, becomes acid, then sweet. The astrin- gent principle which appears before the formation of vegetable acid changes to sugar by oxidizing.” This writer considered that galliec acid was the ** unfinished” vegetable acid, completed by the oxygen which it appropriated. ** It is certain,” he adds, *‘ that the acids oxi- dize more and more; for example, citric acid in green grapes passes, by oxidation, into tartaric acid.” This idea appears to have been cur- rent among the chemists of the time, since it was specifically denied by Frémy in 1544 in the case of grapes. (See Frémy, p. 11.) Other early writers are quoted by Couverchel, showing at what an early date the functions and fate of the changing constituents of growing fruits were studied and how varied were the notions con- cerning them. For example, Lamarck and Decandolle considered that oxygen arising from the decomposition of carbon dioxid acted on the mucilage of the fruit, changing it to sugar. Berthollet thought @ Loc. cit. ’J. pharm. chim., 1821 (2), 7: 249; and Ann. chim. phys., 1831 (2), 46: 147. STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. jul that the acid flavor of green fruits was produced by oxygen, which was only very teebly held in combination in the fruit. This first paper by Couverchel gives results of the analysis of juice of apricots and grapes at different stages of growth, determinations of density, acidity, dry weight (in vacuo), gum, sugars (weighed as dried sirup), ash, and soluble ash. In the second contribution, in 1831,¢ further quotations from early writings are given. Of much interest is that from the work of Ingenhouz:? All fruits, day and night, exhale a mephitic air, and possess the power to render the surrounding air unwholesome. I have been very much astonished to find a poison in fruits which are so much eaten, the more since the finest fruits possess this power in high degree. * * * Couverchel differed from his predecessors, believing the presence of air to be only incidental in the ripening of fruits, and that ripening @oes on by action of principles contained in the fruit. It may be, he says, that the sap becomes acidified in its passage through the young branches to the ovary by reason of the decomposition of water and absorption of the oxygen. The acids so formed may act on the gela- tin and give rise to sugars, sugars being considered as intermediate substances between the mucilages and the vegetable acids, containing more oxygen than the former and less than the latter. In 1844 Frémy¢ discussed the work of Bérard on the respiration of fruits. He confirmed the observation that fruits consume oxygen, giving off carbon dioxid, and carried out an experiment similar to those of Bérard. In Frémy’s work the unripe fruit, attached to the tree instead of being kept in a closed jar as in the experiments of Bérard, was coated with varnish, in this way stopping the normal respiratory changes. (Growth was found to cease, as in the experi- ments of Bérard. The air contained in green and in ripe fruits was analyzed by boiling slices of the fruit in brine and analyzing the air which separated. The presence of a ferment causing the respiratory changes was sug- gested, although a pear, after it was ground, gave off no carbon dioxid gas, whereas before grinding carbon dioxid was freely evolved. The old idea that the acids change in ripening (see p. 10) was refuted in the case of grapes, by the recognition of tartaric acid in the very young fruit. Unripe fruit was profoundly altered by soaking in dilute sodium carbonate, but no conclusions are drawn. Objection is made to the statement that starch can form the sugar found in fruit, since the sugar «Loe. cit. bVersuche mit Pflanzen, 1786, 1: 64; 2: 61, 221, through Gerber, loc. cit. ¢Compt. rend., 1844, 19: 784. 12 STUDIES ON APPLES. (glucose) formed from starch by the action of acids was found by Biot to be not the same as the sugar in fruits. Some of the ideas of Frémy were vigorously combated by Cou- verchel.“ , A-very valuable contribution to the subject of the analysis of fruits by Buignet,’ which appeared in 1860, is of interest because of the methods given for the determination of many constituents of the straw- berry. Water, acid, sugars, fat, soluble and insoluble protein, mare, nitrogen-free parenchyma, pectin, odoriferous principles, coloring matters, and ash are worked out. Strawberries containing the least water are said to contain the most sucrose, and this is explained on the hypothesis that the acid and sucrose are contained in different cells, and in the presence of much water these diffuse more readily than in drier berries, a more rapid inversion ensuing. Sucrose is believed to be the initial sugar formed. Results for many varieties of strawber- ries are tabulated. A later paper’ gives results concerning sugars in fruit in the form of a summary of 14 conclusions, some of which are as follows: Sucrose is found in many fruits, becoming inverted in the ripening, sometimes completely, e. g@., in grapes, currants, and figs: sometimes partially, e. g., in bananas, apricots, peaches, plums, apples, and pears. No relation exists between sucrose and the acidity of fruits, but the sugar is probably inverted by a nitrogenous ferment. This was proved by showing that, after precipitating with alcohol, the sucrose remained unchanged; that after neutralizing an original sample of juice with calcium carbonate, the inversion still went on; and that in bananas, which have no free acid, starch is rapidly changed to sucrose. Invert sugar prevents the crystallization of sucrose, but the latter sugar was isolated in crystals from a number of fruits by a pro- cedure which is described. Starch was not found in fruits (except the banana), but a tannin-like, astringent principle is described as oceur- ring in unripe fruits, which decolors an iodin solution, yielding a pre- cipitate which, when treated with acid, yields a glucose sugar, the same as that formed from nut galls. The starch and tannin found in the banana are said to disappear simultaneously, giving rise to cane sugar. Finally we are told that a difference exists between sugars of fruits according as they are produced under action of vegetable forces, or Without it, e. g., bananas contain more sucrose and less invert sugar when allowed to ripen on the tree than if ripened after picking. Berthelot and Buignet” worked on the ripening of oranges. Two samples of green oranges were studied. Several fruits from each “Compt. rend., 1844, 19: 1) 14. ’J. pharm. chim., 1859 (3), 86: 81-111 and 170-198; résumé in Compt. rend., 1859, 49: 276-278. ¢Compt. rend., 1860, 41: 894. @[bid.: 1094. STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 13 sample were analyzed, the remainder being kept for some time in a dry place at an even temperature, when another analysis was made. No figures were given, and changes in the sugar only are reported, but these changes were remarkable, because, while the invert sugar remained nearly constant, the sucrose increased, calculated either on the basis of juice or on that of soluble solids. This was considered as a very curious change to take place in an acid fruit. It is the more notable when it is remembered that the green fruit contains no starch. Cahours“” noted that ripe oranges evolved carbon dioxid, consuming oxygen at the same time, and that when all the oxygen was used up the carbon dioxid evolution still continued. It also continued in an atmosphere of nitrogen. Chatin’ considered that the carbon dioxid evolved by ripening fruits resulted from the oxidation of the tannin, since, as the fruit ripened, tannin disappeared. Frémy° called attention to the three periods in the life Wirore of a fruit—growth, ripening, and decay. | Corewinder” gave an analysis of ripe bananas, and later’ studied bananas from ripeness to decay during a period of eighteen days, dur- ing which sugars were determined at 10 different times. The sucrose fell from 15.90 to 2.84 per cent; total sugar from 21.80 to 14.68 per cent; and invert sugar increased from 3.90 to 11.84 per cent. Beyer’ studied the growth of gooseberries, analyzing them every few days from the time when the fruit was very small until it was ripe. The complete analysis of the fruit at each picking is reported, including sugar, acid, protein, ash, fat, and nitrogen-free residue. No determinations of sucrose were made. A notice of work done by Pasteur in 1866 is found in a review of literature on the ripening of grapes by Fitz (p. 14). Pasteur cast doubt upon the idea that the acid in ripening grapes gave rise to sugar, by discovering that in sour varieties the acid actually increased during ripening. Petit? published discussions on the ripening of grapes. He con- sidered that during ripening the sugar came from the cellulose in the fruit, the cellulose first changing to acid by oxidation, and the acid then becoming sugar with the evolution of carbon dioxid. Both sucrose and reducing sugar were found .in the leaves of the grape, cherry, and peach, but in the grape itself only reducing sugar was present. “Compt. rend., 1864, 58: 495 and 653. bTbid., 1864, 58: 576. ¢Ibid., p. 656. @Tbid., 1863, 57: 781. é Ann. agron., 1876, 2: 429. fLandw. Versuchs-Stat., 1865, 7: 355. gCompt. rend., 1869, 69: 760; and ibid., 1873, 77: 944. 14 STUDIES ON APPLES. Dupré,” however, noted a positive increase in acid in grapes during ripening, disproving the conclusion of Petit. Neubauer’ studied the ripening of grapes. The complete analysis of two varieties of grapes at successive stages of growth is presented. No satisfactory explanation could be given for the great increase of sugar that took place on ripening. Famintzin® published the results of a study of the ripening of grapes, which is of much interest because it explains the hitherto unknown source of the sugars which appear in the grape on ripening. He used both chemical and microscopical methods. ‘Twelve analyses of a variety of growing grapes are given and the results discussed. The unripe grape contains no starch, but the stems of the fruit are full of starch, which disappears as the grape ripens. Tannin was present throughout the very young fruit, but later occurs only in the outer laver of the fruit pulp and in the embryo. This work was confirmed by Hilger,’ who followed the changes of water, ash, sugar, and acid content in the leaves and fruit of the grape during growth. The stems of the fruit were found to be full of starch, which disappeared when the rapid increase of sugar began. The increase of sugar for a period of six days at the ripening time was from 3.87 to 7.70 per cent in the case of one variety, and from 5.33 to 7.71 per cent in another, during which time the starch in the stems disappeared. Mercadante’ believed that the sugars were formed at the expense of the gummy matters in the fruit, and also from acids, the fruit being thus considered to be the seat of the formation of sugar. Macagno’ showed that sugar formation takes place in the leaves, not in the fruit of the grape. Saintpierre and Magnien’ held a similar view. These-authors first give a review of the literature on fruit ripening. They found that ripening fruits give off carbon dioxid in light or darkness, that they absorb or give off water according as they are kept in a moist or dry place, and that acid and sugar come to the fruit through the stem. The acid is believed to be used up in respiration, the sugar meanwhile concentrating in the fruit until in its turn it furnishes the carbon dioxid for combustion. Pollacci,” studying the after ripening of grapes, found that the sugar increased and the acid decreased in grapes stored after picking. “Weinlaube, 1870, p. 274, through A. Fitz, Ann. Oenol. 2: 241. /Landw. Versuchs-Stat., 1869, 11: 416. ¢ Ann. Oenol., 1871, 2: 242. 7 Landw. Versuchs-Stat., 1874, 17: 245. ‘Gazzetta chimica Italiana, 1875, 5th ser., p. 125, through Gerber, loc. cit. / Compt. rend., 1877, 85: 763, 810, through Gerber, loc. cit. ?Ann. agron., 1878, 4: 161. "Tbid., 1877, 3: 629. STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 15 Lechartier and Bellamy” published two papers which give results of experiments with apples stored in sealed vessels. Large quanti- ties of carbon dioxid gas were evolved during the long periods of time in which the fruit was under observation. Very considerable quanti- ties of alcohol were found, and the presence of yeast cells in the par- enchyma cells of the sound apple is noted. These observations have never been confirmed, neither alcohol nor yeast celis occurring in an apple whose skin is intact; however, so far as is known no work has been done since on apples held in sealed chambers. Pfeiffer’? gives a review of the chemical study of fruits. In the same paper are given the results and a discussion of the study of the orowth of apples and pears. Crude fiber, ash, protein, sugar, acid, water, and pectin and dextrin, are all shown to increase during growth, the constituents of the apple increasing more rapidly in the three varieties studied than those of the pear, of which two varieties were used. Mach¢ carried on work on the growth and ripening of grapes and later” extended the work to other fruits, viz, apples, pears, mulber- ries, strawberries, red and black currants, cherries, and peaches. With grapes he found that the fruit grows rapidly in size until it begins to color, then grows more slowly. Sugar develops slowly at first, but after the coloring of the grape, very rapidly. The percent- age of acid remains about constant till ripening begins, when it falls. Tannin is present in the largest quantity at first. Starch is present in the growing shoots in the leaves and in the grape stems. It disap- pears, however, as the fruit ripens. Unfortunately, with the other fruits studied, no determinations of sucrose are made. Ricciardi’ followed the ripening of bananas, the starch being found to give rise to sucrose. The author agreed with Buignet/’ that in the banana ripened on the tree there is no invert sugar, but this point is not brought out in the analysis given. No alcohol was found in the over-ripe fruit. The work of De Luca is used as a basis for further work by Gerber’ on the ripening of olives. In De Luea’s paper” a table showing the growth of the olive from June to February is given. Thirty-four examinations were made on different dates to determine the average weight and density. Picked olives yielded more oil when they were allowed to stand in oxygen, or in air in daylight, than when analyzed at once or after they were kept in carbon dioxid. The presence of a bitter principle was noted in green olives, removable by prolonged soaking in water. Mannite was found in considerable quantity in the fruit and leaves of the olive tree and was isolated by extracting with «Compt. rend., 1869, 69: 356, 466. €Compt. rend., 1882, 96: 393. 6 Ann. Oenol., 1876, 5: 271. Oc elte ¢Ibid., 1877, 6: 409. g Compt. rend., 1897, 125: 658. @ Ibid., 1879, 8: 46. h Tbid., 1861, 53: 380. 16 STUDIES ON APPLES. hot alcohol. It was believed by the author to be essential for the production of oil, though this could not be proved. In a second contribution” the results of successive analyses of the pulp of the olives for oil are given. The percentage increased by large increments, but irregularly (probably because of the small sample used— three fruits) with the growth. The presence of a chlorophylllike body in the pulp was observed, becoming less in quantity as the fruit approached ripeness. The proportion of pulp to pit is given. The third paper’ discusses mannite. Determinations of mannite in the fruit during growth are given. It was found to occur in widely varying amounts up to 1.54 per cent of the dry matter. The mannite and the chlorophyll-like body disappeared as the fruit ripened and seemed to be closely connected with the formation of oil. Upon the results of the above work, and from his own experiments on the respiration of olives, Gerber ¢ considers that he has established direct proof of the transformation of sugar-like bodies, especially man- \ nite, into oils. When the respiratory quotient O “(ratio by volume of carbon dioxid produced to oxygen consumed) is greater than unity, and no acids are disappearing to furnish the extra carbon dioxid by breaking down (which he believes takes place in acid fruits), mannite is believed to be passing over into olive oil with the evolution of water and carbon dioxid. Roussille% presented consecutive analyses of the leaves and fruit of the olive tree during the growing season. He determined that the oil did not undergo migration from the leaves to the fruit, but was formed in the fruit. Funaro*’ gives a short review of previous work, noting that of De Luca (see p. 15) and the paper of Harz,’ and concludes that the oil is formed by special secreting cells containing an unknown material. The author then gives his results in tabular form, which represent the growth of the olive, the weight and dimensions of the fruit, the moisture content of flesh and stone, and the total ether extract in flesh and stone. Mannite was found in small quantities in fruits and leaves. Its presence in fruits at the end of the growing season contradicted the conclusions of De Luca, who states that it disappears as the fruit increases in oil. According to Funaro this indicates that mannite prob- ably has nothing to do with the formation of oil. This view is in accordance with conclusions reached by Hartwich and Uhlmann.’ These authors considered @lucose to be the material “Compt. rend., 1862, 55: 470. ¢ Landw. Versuchs-Stat., 1880, 25: 52. oT bid., 56: 506. J Ann. prak. Pharm., 19: 161. ¢Tbid., 125: 658. 9 Arch. Pharm., 1902, 240: 471. d Ann. agron., 1878, 4: 230. LL STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. af from which oil is formed, and affirm that mannite does not occur in the fruit of the olive. Keim“ studied changes in the composition of the flesh of cherries at intervals of from seven to ten days. As the fruit ripened the percent- age of water decreased, and both acid and sugar increased with total dry matter. In the early stages of growth, citric, malic, and succinic acids were present, but nine days before ripeness the succinic acid disappeared. Dextrose and jievulose are always present, while inosite, which at first was present in appreciable quantity, diminished to a mere trace. Sucrose was present in smallamount. No starch was found in the fruit save in the outer green layer of the very young fruit, but it occurred in the parenchyma cells of the fruit stem in increasing amounts as the fruit ripened. Kulisch’ presented a valuable discussion of the changes in the con- stituents of ripening fruits, giving also an account of.a study of the changes which a variety of apples underwent on storing at cellar tem- perature. The fruit from two trees of the same variety in the same orchard were employed and analyzed separately, so that the results have further interest in showing how the composition of fruit from different trees of the same variety, grown under the same cultural conditions, may vary. (See p. 31 and fig. 6, p. 30.) _ The growth of a single variety of apples was thoroughly studied by Lindet,° who examined the fruit at fifteen-day intervals through the growing season (see p. 24 and fig. 29, p. 63). He established the fact that the acid content gradually became less, and that the starch increased by degrees until the fruit began to ripen, when it decreased eradually. Sucrose and invert sugar increased steadily up to the last analysis. A portion of each sample received was left in darkness and analyzed at intervals. The starch decreased gradually to about 0.8 per cent, sucrose and invert sugar increased, while total carbohydrates fell, allowance being made for loss of moisture by the fruit on being kept. These changes are recognized as taking place: (1) The change of starch into sucrose; (2) the inversion of sucrose; and (8) the con- sumption of invert sugar in respiration. The change of starch into sucrose is said to be a chemical phenomenon whose mechanism escapes us. ‘The localization and disappearance of starch in apples.is described, and a description of the starch grains is given. C. A. Browne, jr.,” noted the starch and sugar changes of a sample of Baldwin apples, picked green, obtaining results similar to those of Lindet and those obtained in the Bureau of Chemistry. Otto’ also «7ts. anal. Chem., 1892, 30: 401, abstr. in Agr. Science, 1892, 6: 387. bLandw. Jahrb., 1892, 21: 871. ¢Ann. agron., 1894, 20: 5-20. @Penn. State Dept. Agr., Bul. 58. eCentrbl. agrikulturchem. (Biedermann), 1902, 31: t07. 27981—Bul. 9405-2 18 STUDIES ON APPLES. studied the growth and ripening of a variety of apples, noting that the percentage of water, acid, and starch decreased more or less uniformly, while dry matter, extract, sucrose, and reducing sugar increased. In another contribution by Otto” a study of the changes which go on in common storage is presented. Samples of eight varie- ties of apples were analyzed before and after cellar storage. A gradual diminution of all constituents was found except in two cases in which, while the acid and starch decreased, the total sugar showed a slight increase. In further work done by Otto? it was found that the starch in ripe apples when they were allowed to sweat in piles was entirely converted into sugar in two or three weeks, the fruit thus becoming more valua- ble for cider making. The contribution of Gerber“ to the subject of the ripening of fruits is of considerable importance. The work is of some length, occupying 280 pages. First, the work of various writers on respiration and car- bohydrate, acid, and tannin changes in growing and ripening fruits is reviewed, together with the resulting hypotheses regarding these functions. The author then describes the methods and apparatus employed by him in the researches which are described. The relative intensity of respiration and the value of the respiratory quotient, CO, RON sath ep : yey, Hos: “©, > are the chief criteria used. ‘The fruit (a single fruit in case of apples) is held in a sealed glass container, and the air of the chamber is analyzed aftera time. The air is then renewed and the experiment repeated, the temperature being held constant. In this way the inten- sity of respiration and the respiratory quotient—i. e., the ratio of carbon dioxid given off by the fruit to the oxygen consumed—may be observed. The method is first employed with apples. It is noted that unripe apples breathe much more rapidly than ripe apples. The respiratory \ quotient, ~¢ *, is found to be greater than unity in the case of growing apples, but it is considered that it is impossible to determine to what constituent this fact is due, because, although the constituent, malic acid—which is suspected of furnishing the extra carbon dioxid— decreases relatively to the other constituents (though increasing in absolute quantity) during growth, it is impossible to determine whether or not the sap which is supplied to the apple varies in composition during the period of growth. More definite results are considered to be obtained with apples during the period of after-ripening—1. e., ripen- ing after picking—because here no sap is added to the fruit. Apples “Centrbl. agrikulturchem, (Biedermann), 1902, 31: p. 104. bLandw. Versuchs-Stat., 1902, 56: 427. ¢ Loc. cit. (see p. 9). STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. IL, were examined during this period. The influence of temperature, quantity of acid present in the fruit, variety of apple, and the effect of quartering the apples on the intensity of respiration and on the respiratory quotient are described. Apples respire more rapidly at 30° and at 33° than at 18° C. Apples relatively high in acid respire more rapidly and have a higher respiratory quotient than apples low inacid. The influence of cutting the apple into quarters is to increase the intensity of respiration and’ respiratory quotient. Similar researches were carried out with grapes, citrus fruits, almonds, peaches, plums, and apricots. The existence of a respira- tory quotient greater than unity due to the combustion of acids is considered by the author to be established, and numerous conclusions concerning the effect of various factors on the function are given. Work with molds is described, the respiratory quotient of these organisms growing on different media being determined, and the results are believed to furnish direct support to the conclusions which the author has drawn from his work with fruits. Other fruits, Japanese persimmons (Diospyrus khaki zend)1), bananas, sorbes (Sorbus domestica), and medlars (Jlespilus germanica) were now examined by the method of the author. In persimmons tannin is believed to disappear by direct combustion, with no formation of sugar, this conclusion, however, depending on the results of an analy- sis of a single persimmon. The conclusion reached with the acid fruits, that the combustion of the acids is reponsible for the excess of carbon dioxid given off over oxygen consumed, possesses a certain probability merely because of the uniformity of the results obtained with a wide range of varieties of acid fruit. Gerber’s work is valuable as sugeesting certain auxiliary work that may be carried on in connection with the chemicai work necessary to the study of the ripening of fruit. His theories should be considered as hypotheses which must be confirmed by suitable scientific methods before they can be seriously regarded. Such data should be consid- ered as indications of facts only. The number of individual speci- mens in the samples examined and the methods employed do not warrant that any greater weight be given to the data. At the same time it is shown that the examination of the respiratory changes in fruits is easily made, and that fruits of different varieties and different degrees of maturity vary materially in the intensity of their respira- tion. The method would probably be of value in supplementing chemical work on growing or ripening fruits. From the above review it will be recognized how varied are the conclusions reached by workers with ripening fruits. With better chemical knowledge, particularly concerning sugars and starch, satis- factory agreements are found between the work of various modern authors working with apples and grapes. It must be considered that 20) STUDIES ON APPLES. sach variety of fruit presents a different set of relations between its constituents, and that each fruit contains a variety of undetermined substances in considerable amount which make changes between known constituents difficult to demonstrate. No general conclusions can therefore be reached until each kind of fruit is worked with as far as possible through the stages of growth and ripening, and only as the undetermined material in fruits is gradually worked out will the chemistry of fruits become clear. THE RIPENING OF APPLES IN COMMON STORAGE. In the summer of 1901 the preliminary work on the ripening of fruit was begun. Eight varieties of apples were selected, and each one was examined several times, the chief object being the study of meth- ods of analysis. No consecutive data were obtained, but the experi- ence gained was valuable in beginning the work in the following year. This preliminary work on the subject was done principally by Mr. J. 5. Burd. DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIETIES ANALYZED. The following descriptions of the varieties of apples employed in the investigation is furnished by the pomologist of the Bureau of Plant Industry: BEN DAVIS. Fruit medium to large, yellowish, splashed and striped with red. Flesh somewhat tough and lacking in juice; flavor mild subacid. A winter variety of excellent keep- ing quality. BOUGH (Synonym Sweet Bough). Fruit above medium in size, pale greenish yellow. Flesh very tender, with a rich, sweet flavor. An early summer variety ripening overa period of two or three weeks. Keeps but a few days under ordinary conditions after being picked from the tree. EARLY STRAWBERRY. A small roundish apple striped and stained with bright and dark red. Flesh tender, with a sprightly, brisk, subacid flavor. A midsummer variety in season for several weeks. HUNTSMAN (synonym Huntsman Favorite). Fruit large, pale vellow, sometimes shaded with pale red or deep yellow in the sun. Flesh rather coarse, tender, of a mild, rich, subacid flavor. A winter variety of fairly good keeping quality. NORTHERN SPY. Fruit large, greenish yellow, covered with light and dark stripes of purplish red. Mesh tender, with a fine, sprightly subacid flavor. A winter variety of good keep- ing quality under favorable conditions, but quite subject to decay, if roughly handled, - on account of thin skin and tender flesh. STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 21 RHODE ISLAND (synonym Rhode Island Greening) . Fruit medium to large, dark green, becoming greenish yellow when ripe. Flesh tender, crisp, with a rich, acid flavor. An early winter variety of fair keeping quality, quite subject to scald after midwinter, except under very favorable condi- tions. ' WINESAP. Fruit medium in size, of a fine dark red color. Flesh firm, crisp, with a rich, subacid flavor. A winter variety of excellent keeping quality, except for being somewhat subject to scald in late winter and spring. / WINTER PARADISE. Fruit rather large, dull green, with a brownish blush or faint striping. Flesh fine- grained, sweet, and sprightly, with a distinctive and marked aroma. A winter apple of good keeping quality. YELLOW TRANSPARENT. Fruit medium in size, clear greenish yellow in color.- Flesh very tender; flavor sprightly, quite acid; one of the earliest of the summer apples. Ripens over a brief season and keeps but a short time. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSES OF SAMPLES. In the summer of 1902 the study was again taken up, four varieties being selected from three localities. The description of the samples of apples studied and such cultural data as were obtained are given in Table I. The analyses of the apples made from time to time while the samples were held in common storage are given in Table li. These results were also calculated to the basis of total solids and platted on graphic charts (figs. 1-4 and fig. 8), the actual changes in composition during the growth and development of the fruit being illustrated much more clearly in this way than by means of the numerical tables of analyses. In all of these charts the ordinates give the percentage of the various constituents and the abscisse the dates on which the exami- nations were made. “ ON APPLES. STUDIES ‘Od : ‘0d UONBAL TNO pur Surduads Sooy NOL opngyye ‘tlosqus Avpo ‘opuys AoUUOY ULOIY POALLOP 9UOJSAVOS ‘ [LOS ‘Od ‘Od ‘OSVTTL] puvw Surtvads ysno10yy 907 09 MOGVopnyzylLB ‘plosqns urvoyl AvpoO YALAL ‘Apurs ‘[LOS ‘0d ‘Od ‘0d ‘0d ‘od ‘SUOTITIPUOD [BANY[NO JO pLOVaI ON *STLOLO -BIA AT] BusNUN soot) ‘sdoOid TOAOD ADAOTO JO osn TenUUR f9BVIT pue surdAvids YSsn0L0Y] !plO saBod GZ 0} OT Sooty JOoFO IMOqGvopnI lB ‘pLlosqus urvoyl AVpoO YILA ‘Apurs ‘[Los ‘0d ‘od “TO TNU TOF paVyOLO UT JOT SSVI YALAL OANQTNO pos ‘podvids pavyoso S90] OOS‘ T MOGBopNnIVy[V ‘[Llosqus Avypo pues ‘pOARIs 10 AVPO pod AAV UYIM ‘AUOJS SUTVOT ABO ‘LOS ‘sojou [RangpuD sr ae 0) Oe ae Stet aca 0) Ose mies “BAM ‘UMO YS PIVIL0%) Feces i on OD ggicee Feeteess pert: [od ‘Brpouseyy POSTON IGE (o) oO Rees Bene sh (0) One teome Ranier ee ae ON Oa emer ata | Rc Ee Rema ni oa kO) Oba antenee Oop” TU ‘vruoxX [od ‘OPISPOO AK mages = pence) |) aerial re Cae OO ea eAcaN ‘RSRPUOUG YIWOS “AAITROO'T | pe OD Ea bosses gp: “LOTTUN “dd * BOO (gh os Eee. Dar Iodog * Aqiod ‘H Pe OSs sist SiO Dina SSUTYOUH “4 ): w | | “"---"-"OSIPBIBG TOUT AA | “="""" TIBUISJUN TOR LINAS OTS SON CLO UES S| ----quorRdsuBiy, MOTOR Se ter eiae eee TOLL OG sree es" ATIOQMBIIS ATIBA Z 220 oS So cee aaa en USO ULAR DCEO OG AGES} One pie “opi SIAR, UNG Trad OD steige ~- dusour Ay PADIS DOS SOOO YN EES Ld ULOYION | were e rere gf sulleatsy puLvisy opoyy ara a i cue Met ie ere emake U2 Oboe ied | ra XU) eet eee cere e eee eee e reese Qpeetes| 9 Opts: vere retest eeeeeeeeeess pees") gf oune Fete teers eee eee eee pees | Oper: Fgh ha Ne are Ted de ee AS |) eee Faas Soak Fs lee eee aN OLE) ot aT ROLLED |S “S06T SAO) Se-¢ malic bok ee SODnmee "| OGu dou BOD eer Hie OD ea SBIOIS POD |""" Op--*” Prge waaat 0) Ofrmemintel rtrd tl] () 9S5BIOIS UOULUTOD | OZ “120 x ~ ‘OSRLIOIS UOULTIOD PUB YIMOLS JO SASBIS 19IBT 9 “WO oe ee” I59F COM RIT We. 0n) oO op. ope” ‘OSRIOIS UOULTIOD PUB YIMOLS JO S9sRIS 191BT] 1% any ‘TO6I ‘SISATBUR SIU Jo e1RGg ‘COGT PUY EO6I—paripnys sajddp fo sajdups sof ppp JOLnyNd Pun aavdidosay—"T ATAV YL C6F9 P6F9 £6F9 Icke GGPO OZF9 9ZLI CRLL Q60T CHOOT Sts -A [BU 1S1y "ON u ) [Vlas 23 STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. ‘SUOTVB[NI[RO UL posn JON p pee G9E” 69%" | 862° | Sele cece SSSESS A eae eee ener EHO? || OgDe> Pe ere 00% eco | ea: (Opes eS C0sae ass OHO? || Gaye eeeezer My | ane” Reece | i “STM OpLOU AM) yO Aqt) -ABIS | dY1O | -ods xo ae” Te" 8&" Be Cr eee 6o'0 | 880 QO MA | °J0 MIg q ase jo “ysB Ajrur( | [R10 -BALY C10" 6€0° SEG 810° 980° O0€ “0 160° CEO cred itopeotces eal) | Gi ees CCORORCSONON Bien tee 90 lad’ | "70 dag’ |°0 lad Kagel No j | “uosd | °9184 aid | -O171U | -1d to é , | [8104 | -o1d n[os ee eto -OOLV “Ud SOIJIN lV ‘aHYsOs UOULWMOD UL pjay sajddv Jo sashjnun “SsuUvS -0JU0g “SOT NTLID ‘OVP STUY I9IJB JUISqB YorvyS o 186 CoML L0°LL 9% TL. GG SI iu Pat ser 9L SI 10 GL SL 11 18 6 Rae “IIp “ILp IL “GL 6 L “WIOA -UL SB /suBsns [BIOL 16'8 ve L G68 G& 8& r9 IG cI IL vL 868 89°L G8 TT 6P 88 L8- 06 60 08 90 16 69 6¢ 99 CT ID1D OS OO rm && 80 60 6G 68'S 60°¢ 8c PF YO dag COD ABBOD "VIOA -UL SB | sind | ns Sut) -oup -OY ‘ayeuOqsed tuNTSsR}Od SV q ‘quad sed G9 AQ poonpod SUONBUTTAIOJOP TYOIvIS v Gy OGhi |, 28148 eke! 8.0 | 8L°S | 0G IAG 756) — |" 1.9! CORE EGS ice CuO0C 18 lO ta eecEG | Places | Oncw PANG C Me Onee iO kPa Cie GealeLouc GANA EG — a y= O6e oRSecn | Sk0c4@) Ga |) 019 OLS |:18"s COME TET) I | P6°L | 66°L STAB p an GeO Lone. LG 7p) OGABNCS, =) Sir | GG "sg £9 °§ 0¢78 84 —| 0°§-) CONG WLS aL OG AB ee | Ole ra| GL-T 86°L |§°3638 GuI—| 6°L—-} LL Ip | 80°% YG MOS =) Gt R= CHCs | ONCE OGE ING | On Ge O8 8L°S WGN SOL te 06°F | 16°F (LGN E I po 20'S | GLP |8°0G3808'°L —-| 9°8— HEC | EG SLMS Di) Gi bo 'T L9'T Gc1eB G0 9 —) S83 -§€— OG Waa LN Fh ah Gh C6" SGU Ee GONG) Va Oli Omer 6P I | 6¢°L GAB MORO lan 99°T | $8 FOIV 86 —| PL— CLL | PR GP \S°toIB 86 —| 9:9— | 6 NAPE “Neen ey sl tg PLS | 9L°S | 029BGZ'°6 —| 9°¢- SONG mouee UG: AAS If fh te 99°F | 9L°F | EME OW SN GCaina RE ONCE SHOCAT CM Gu el GONG ae GViG) | S0G,G. > | x6 81.09, || Sore — OGHGRARGSialen a Code Gone lbs Ones Pld! Pd) Oo ‘Ao Ao uoy | ‘uo rar “UOIS -ONp |-BZIRT | | : -IOAUL =aNG FOUhAchises oa d10Jog ‘asoIOng “MONRZLIVOg ILUYINIISUO) — "TT pb YOIBIS | | aTAV |, | 66° SL 91 | 6 OF* CLOT | T OP’ =| G6 °CT | 8T “AON GP” 9 9L | &@ OF PL SL OF 96 “LT LG” FO ST Gh £0 “LT 0g" ZO 9L cg" G69 | L “AON 79° 09°. | 9 “00 “CO6L pp’ | SL ST | GE “UBe | | “SO6L | ie IE KS EXAL | Gh, §9 CT | GL “90” | 9¢° | OL ST | I 9090 OL’ | G6 9T | 4 “AON WAP Wet) AE ee) s10X0) 00°T | 68°ST | GT 4dos FOL | 09'PI | Gz “sny “GO6BL Gy IS AL Tt oki WE rN LANE NE aks haL Si a 19°9T | 46 “UBe Bes ana Inari LE “uve Wigs = Wee eS aes | | “S061 9F° | P8°SL | Ig “ood 9F° | 9S ST | GL 00d Ee a (OSM Ik ORKOL OL” 89°CT | Z “AON 8° PL'SE | 9 400 86° | GPL | ST 3dog PLT | 49°SL | G3 -sny ‘po lad |") “dT | “GOB Peg ‘SPI[OS “SISA[TRUR PRY | [BIOL | JO 9)¥q op op oO) 0) Qpit tye oR eee op--7"- a rats ee sete op-777- Ae cts SULIT) puev[s—, opoyy | “Joe A | C8IL 9LIT POLL OPI 6L4I1T COIL PPL PSIL 69IT 9CTL 9611 0606 C69T L9GL SLIT PCIL SoTL IGIL 960T O&8G 61LG L9G GG0G 1606 P69T OGL LLIL CCIL LOI OGL C60L 24 STUDIES ON APPLES. Discussion oF ANALYTICAL Data. By referring to the graphic chart of Rhode Island Greening apples (fig. 1) it will be noted that the examination made on August 25 gave a sucrose content of 13 per cent on the basis of total solids. The con- tent of sucrose increased steadily until about November 7, when the maximum was reached. During this time the content of starch had decreased, and the curve representing the decrease of starch is almost the reverse of the curve representing the increase of sucrose. ‘The sucrose reached the maximum on the date mentioned, November 7, after which it rapidly decreased, and the date of the disappearance of the starch was almost, if not quite, coincident with that of the maxi- mum content of sucrose. The entire crop of apples was picked between October 6 and Novem- ber 7, and unfortunately during that period, owing to the congested condition of the railroads, it was impossible to obtain samples of fruit, and the changes of composition taking place just at the time of ripen- ing were not studied in as. great detail as had been planned. It is probable that after picking the changes of composition may have pro- gressed more rapidly than would have been the case if they could have been left on the tree. The sum of the starch and sucrose (starch calculated as sucrose) is shown to decrease up to the point where the starch entirely disap- peared. After this time the sucrose content decreases much more rapidly. The content of invert sugar increases from the earliest examination throughout the experiment. The curve representing the content of invert sugar is approximately the reverse of the curve representing first the decrease of starch and sucrose, and later the decrease of sucrose. It will also be noted on the chart (fig. 1) that the total content of sugar (calculated as invert sugar) increased from the first examination to the date of the disappearance of the starch. After this date the curve representing the total sugar as invert merges with the curve representing the total carbohydrates as invert sugar. This latter curve does not include the cellulose. In the Rhode Island Greening apples the total carbohydrate content decreased to some extent after the disappearance of the starch. In the cases of the other varieties of apples previously mentioned, and some varieties to be described later, the percentage of total carbohydrates did not materially change during the later stages of the growth and development of the fruit. At the same time a slight increase of carbohydrates expressed in terms of total solids seemed to occur during the growth of the apple before its separation from the tree, and a decrease occurred after picking, especially during long storage. Up to the point of the maximum starch content the percentage of total carbohydrates increases rapidly. This point is discussed in greater detail subse- 25 STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. ga | ees ge [i Lt | a2 a BEES S ceSans HOSE Pass See NSERC 0 Supe \naueSeeE as ea Hh bef 12a a Tee a | Ln a a SSS eT a YS Sa a a [Ge | 8 WS BN EN (aS eal PN a HG AE SESS a i GEBESS Bl a H26ed = es a se el eee eae oo ae Za a senee REE ee Nemoto op aA A Hg SiGe ABNER ARBBEALINN Fia@. 1.—Chart showing results of analyses of Rhode Island Greening apples in common storage at room temperature (total solids basis) 26 STUDIES ON APPLES. SRR EERE REECE BSTeDoess se BISISETSIT ISte (etc Ie Ap ieee bela HEARASDS SS Jai ee is SSeS BERR RSS SRe4e0See BERR R RES Sosy eke eae sa | oS oe Ts i a a Se / FS [ BREIERY, BERES a a et EME G2 BREE SRE S Ses, ERS IT 2s | es ae SEEsaanGnseeecaasneeseseeeeee SenUGGREnTap -cauSbErSTeEEEEEeD ed as ae Pee es [eG sc BBS / Beane ES< Ses keeeesake Bt SS [a L eae aL BN BREA EERE SHUlSmeawas NOV. DEC. JAN. Fie. 2.—Chart showing results of analyses of Northern Spy apples in common storage at room tem- perature (total solids basis). SEPT. 1902 OCT. STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 27 sy. SDDS SBaS SS oh SES eea \ CGE eos ogee ae eS ae ee LLLLELLL bad Soe EEC nee ES Bene Zoo SSeS paisalele leet aloo b Aare sane sence ee Ge eee A 2S HT babe BER Zaae eT a a 19 ocT. 1902 NOV. Fic. 3.—Chart showing results of analyses of Winesap apples in common storage at room tempera- ture (total solids basis). . Fic, STUDIES ON APPLES. |_| | | ot tt Bs BERGER RBS ee BEENGEGE Gees. oo | N DP SERES fh alee SERERER OP Zee Se oa BRREPNrP See SEwees Oe Ge Sie ANS dal Creal ela AVé400008ee——— =" HeMeic 2 CECE HEHEHE Ba pA Eas ee ae a a H+ op ceca teestestastae || | |) IA, a Ea | 1 y | ae A a | | ba pe (2aeen8 5 JRA feel tebe ACEC PA se eS SUZ el §| Hees Shap eanee Oran viim yl TINT | 1 AG GG if Anes 1 8 Khode Island Greening — ——— Northern Spy — — — — WinNeSAp 4. 1.—Chart comparing results of analyses of three varieties of apples in common storage at room temperature (total solids basis). 29 STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. ae2anm Baal AREY Gana eeaeas SiS) 6 ae BES Feaeeee 10 20 30 AUG. 1899 SEPT. __ |_| (00) oO 2 %o (Calculated to total solids basis. ) Fic. 5.—Chart showing results of analyses by C. A. Browne, jr., of Baldwin apples in common storage at room temperature. 30 STUDIES ON APPLES. Sey eu ELT eT TT eT TET eA “ SEE a aALEeeeyy CREPETLRETALEANGURIT ia ee ae ikem (aa es Blea oe +e ee eae fa oa ae iad = “ Oo 2 wos gee | | eal | i | HIUTEELEALHAAEEEEY GG00000 PETE eet NT ESAEH PCCP ENN OEE EEE ES asa ene aS PALL LTT ASV | seer ~ TESS Ea ae a PLP Se Sea Se rE ETS) e ES ee ap jf paseo EE ay eee a ; EPA APAAATGMEBEAHOTONOTOWOAUOUOTOTOUEE AAT NITE pin ao RORERRORARERERRE Se: 90 ASE ENACT TTS oS Lae ar Sranene SCE CUE AAG PNET EE INTENT EET EEE EEE LTTE Tere BRBRRRSSHERESE SEAL Gold Parmiine A Gold Parmiine B -------- Fic. 6.—Chart showing results of analyses by Kulisch of apples stored at cellar temperature. (Cal- culated to an assumed basis of 17 per cent of total solids.) STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 3l queatly with reference to immature fruit (see page 52). It is greatly to be regretted that this study was not begun at an earlier date, when the apples were less mature. Apparently they had reached, or per- haps passed, the maximum starch content before the first sample was secured, and a complete study of the life history of the fruit of course could not be made with the material taken. Certain irregularities in these results are due to the fact that the apples were grown at some distance from Washington, and two or three days elapsed from the time they were picked until they were used in analysis, these condi- tions not haying been sufliciently understood when the work was begun. Further information on this subject is found on page 50. The acid content of the apple (on the percentage basis) decreased per- ceptibly throughout the experiment. The foregoing comments on Rhode Island Greening apples are equally applicable to the results on the Northern Spy and the Wine- sap apples, platted in figures 2 and 3. The similarity of the curves representing the content of each ingredient is strikingly brought out in figure 4, in which the three varieties are compared. For further comparison with these results those obtained by Dr. C. A. Browne, jr.,“ on Baldwin apples have been calculated to total solids and are presented in graphic form in figure 5. The results obtained by Kulisch,? who worked with apples stored at cellar temper- ature, have also been recalculated, using an assumed total solid basis of 17 per cent, and the results are presented graphically in figure 6. It will be noted that in all respects the results of Browne and of Kulisch are analogous to those obtained in this Bureau. Doctor Browne’s experiment, however, was begun with apples in a more immature state than was the case with the work done in the Bureau of Chemistry, and for that reason more complete results were obtained, although his first examination also was made after the point of maxi- mum starch content was passed. The work of Kulisch was carried on with two samples of apples of the same variety from the same orchard, but picked from different trees. His results show what wide varia- tions in chemical composition may occur in fruit of the same variety grown under the same cultural conditions but on different trees. THE RIPENING OF APPLES IN COLD STORAGE. Late in August, 1902, an experimental export shipment was made of early-picked Ben Davis and Winesap apples from southern Illinois for the purpose of determining whether it would be profitable to place these apples on the London market so early in the season. The fruit had been picked About August 15. Some weeks later samples of both — @ Pa. State Dept. of Agr., Bul. No. 58. 6 Landw. Jahrb., 1892, 21: 871. 32 STUDIES ON APPLES. varieties were secured from lots from the same locality, picked at the same time, which had been kept in cold storage in Chicago. Samples were also secured of the same varieties picked at the usual time, about September 15, from trees in the same locality and situated similarly to those from which the export shipments had been taken. Early in October two barrels of each variety from each picking were shipped to Washington from Chicago in refrigerator cars. By special arrange- ment the apples were sent direct from cold storage to the cars and from the cars to the cold-storage rooms in Washington without expos- ing them to a higher temperature for more than a few moments at a time. It is regretted that samples of the early-picked apples were not obtained at the time of picking, but owing to the commercial impor- tance of the shipment in question it seemed advisable to work with this special lot. The apples were received on October 10 and were exam- ined then and at varying intervals afterwards. RESULTS OF ANALYSES. The analytical results are found in Table III, and the platted data in figures 7, 8, 9, and 10. The date of the last examination reported in this bulletin was April 27, 1904. It is improbable, however, even if they had been made, that continued analyses would have been of any material value since the apples of all varieties were decaying rapidly. Owing to this fact it is suggested that the results of such analyses would jead to incorrect conclusions regarding the change in composition of apples in storage, because of a probable selective tendency of the rot, it being possible that apples of a certain compo- sition may decay more rapidly than those of a different kind. At the same time no law has been discovered which seems to control or regulate the development of the decay in fruit. The selective ten- dency of decay is suggested, therefore, as a possibility which might lead to erroneous results in the work, and not as a probability indi- cated by the work itself. At the same time it is worthy of comment that after October 21, 1903, when decay began, the change of com- position of the apples in storage which remained sound was noticeably different from the change occurring prior to that date. With reference to the solids, the carbohydrates tended to increase after October 21, in the case of the early-picked Ben Davis and the late-picked Ben Davis and Winesap apples. The change in content of carbohydrates was more gradual in the case of the early-picked W inesap. 33 STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. = s Hit 7.—Chart chen results of analyses of Ben Davis Or ae August 15, 1902, and under varying conditions of storage (total solids basis). 981—Bul. 94—05——3 ld ‘ . - 34 STUDIES ON APPLES. | He CET tH I HH HE BOELRRSOE TTA LUT Ue LTT Sot EEEEnEEed EE EEE TRA bape sMaNoe3007 cs seeeneee et MUUERENEEREELELEE MELLEL Abi28 pl tee OMT eee LTT Seat ~=CUL HEURAGETLLE Ses caaHOTGTRONOLONONEOLT nit EHH ded. Pe PO HNOROGNNGODGKAUURER POCCCEECCCEEC NSC He HARTRWOWOWOVOTL AAUAHAHAGH OHAGHGG\ CHAEAONGOUGEUONAUMOGUGUAGAORUONGONGGUORUOTAENOLGENGGyeCqOLUEL HH aS ee BAUHEAKUGOULGRHNOMUSAUUEAUERLLGHUSOLUGAUSOAUGOUSOUSOKUOUUUGLUOOLUGLLOULUGILUGLL PA SUBRUAOONSAENOAGRNUEUROOERRED aa Hi wali DORGRERRRER REE a es a Walle SAN ORMAUAGHGHGUAUNGRAONORAGNOAWOWGCOQVGRDOWUCWONONUET Ree See ee BOGRORRORE CECE ere Eo Pee cee oa tn te as ee 6 18 18 1727 16 26 8 18 26 17_ 27 ra 0 a TC a oe Te : Fic. 8.—Chart showing results of analyses of Ben Davis apples picked Suis 15, 1902, and kept under varying conditions of storage (total solids basis). Tasie III.—Analyses of cold-storage apples. BEN DAVIS, PICKED AUGUST 15, 1902. Polarization. Suerose. = Aca ae Ream | Total Real wate oe ap tal = Starch.) Before By po-| By re- sugar he! SES eG Ao Seater ciliee inver- | Afterinversion.| lariza-| duc- | a8 | invert sion. tion. tion. | invert. 7 : | i ae 1902. Per ct. | Per ct. | Per cent.| ° V. Oe STG: Per ct. | Per ct. | Per ct. 1147 | Oct. 10] 17.90] 0.684 0.75 | —3.3 —8.1 at 23.4 3.67 | 3.69 7.32 1903. ‘| 2148 | Jan. 19} 17.02} .689 None. | —4.4 —8.3_ at 24 2,99'| 2.99 8.27 | 2883 | Feb. 16 17.41 | . 592 None. | —4.3 —8.4 at 21 beg Ws Fea dg tY/ 8.27 4516 | Mer. 31 | 16.60] .548 None. | —4.5 —7.37 at 25.7 2. 22 2.33 8.38 5992] May 5 16.83 | .482 None. | —4.8 | 4 75 at 25 2eas 2.04 8.61 6489 | June 15 | 16.92 470 None. | —5.05 —7.7 at 25.7 2.05) 1.81 8. 70 7290 | Oct. 21 16. 80 258 NOn eG: 7s Se eee ee | eee eee joveealeait 8. 34 7829 | Dec. 17 16. 86 . 240 None. | —d.8 —7.9 at 22 1.61 1.42 8. 64 ) 1904, | ; 7304 | Jan. 29 15. 97 . 240 None. | —5.8 —7.37 at'22 1.20 1.04 8. 26 1009 | Apr. 27 | 16.21 . 190 None: |< - 222 os satan «is amy et 95 8.33 | a ae Se | | Sein BEN DAVIS, PICKED SEPTEMBER 15, 1902. 1902. 1148 | Oct. 10 16.99 0,570 0.50 —2.8 —8.3 at 23.4 4,20 4.16 6.96 | 1903. 9150 | Jan. 19 | 16.52 . 43 None, —3.9 —8.6 at 24 3.61 3. 62 7.49 2884 | Feb. 16 17. 25 | 920 None. —3.7 —§.8 at 21 3.87 3. 84 7.72 14517 | Mar. 81 | 16.99 . 459 None. —3.5 —8, 14 at 25.7 3. 59 3.40 7.538 5993 | May 5 16.79 | .899 None; |c2.c oul eee eee 3.11 7.62 6490 | June 15 17.22 | .§99 None. | —4.8 —8.8 at 24.8; 58.10 4, 43 7.05 | 7291 | Oct. 21 17.19 28 NOn6 So) iis ccc hcle tcc co eee le irene 2.05 8.04 | 7330 | Dee. 17 16. 20 180 None. —5,8 —7,81 at22' | 1.91 1.75 8.15 | aStarch determinations re aka ed by 0.5 per cent. » Not used in calculation. STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 30 Taste II].—Analyses of cold-storage apples—Continued. WINESAP, PICKED AUGUST 15, 1902. Polarization. Sucrose. Redu- | Acid cing Total seri ate of , : i suge pore hee | aa as Starch. | Before : ; By po-| Byre- | sugar ae CC ae ae aa i ” | malic. inver- | After inversion.| lariza-| duc- | as TaeTE sion. tion. tion. | invert. : | Per ct. | Per cent. Ory Nie °C | Perct.| Per ct. |. Per ct. | Per ct. 4 : 1143 | Oct. 20 | 17.52 | 0.663 | 1.00 | —3.8 —7.5- at 22 2.82 2.63 8.72 11. 49 1903. | 2149 | Jan. 19) 17.06} .569 | None.| —4.8) —7.25 at 24 1.88 1.74 9. 88 tale Al 98855) Heb. 16) 17208 ) -.572.| None. —5 Ae tral 1. 76 1.68 | 10..07 11. 84 4518 | Mar. 31} 17.07 486 None. —o9.4 —7.4 at 25.7 1.56 | ait. 84 10.28 | a12.22 5994 | May 5 17.35 —. 469 INKS S| |Sn ue noan lone aagoer tected lsoeaeece 123 10. 36 11. 65 6491 | June 15 | 17.62, .459 None. 6.0 —7.6 at 26 1.24 1.01 10. 85 11.91 W292 | Oct. 215). 16.34: .376 INOm ei ree cee |sosaceoeedseccses|seooneda .57 9. 65 10. 35 73al | Dec. 17) 16°31 . 380 None. —6.6 7h CHOP aHET lla enn .64 9.98 10. 65 1904. 730) | Jan. 29 | 16.81 | .310 None. —6.4 | =e AOy ated eal lene ao .52 | 10.08 10. 63 11010 | Apr. 27} 16.34 . 300 NOME. |lcedo5eoe lsoabee aochonounsallesaucsoe \iSoRoeeaS 9:90 sl eases | | WINESAP, PICKED SEPTEMBER 15, 1902. 1902. | | 1142 | Oct. 20 16.84 | 0.684 0.86 | —3.1 —7.2 at 22 SHIGE Cet cy 8.01 | @11.66 1903. 2151 | Jan. 19 | 16.65 .610 None. | —4.3 —7.0 at 24 2.46 ONTO e28 11. 92 2886 | Feb. 16 | 17.10 .611 None. | —4.75 —8. 25 at 21 2.68 2.48 9.51 12.12 4519 | Mar. 31 | 17.03 .037 | None. | —o.05 —8. 14. at 25.7 2.39 2.53 | 9.96 12. 62 5995 | May 5! 17.638 0407) ea NOME. | <—5: 2 --8.1 at 25 2.24 2.14 | 10.03 12. 28 6492 | June 15 16.87 .476 | None. | —d.5 —7.6 at 26 LAGS ae aR 1 el ON 46 12.05 7293 | Oct. 21 16. 77 AAD el ararIN ULE ae eee eec|| a Stee op ee ee, PS 74 9.65 10. 43 7302 | Dec. 17 | 16.89 .440 | None. | —6.8 —8.2 at 22 1.07 .97 10.14 11.16 1904. | | | (BAe | deh, BE NE SB ceil None. | —6.1 —7.37 at 22 97 | SOE eel Olle 10.95 11011 | Apr. 27 16. 60 ey ead eee NOM Casa erates mua ale aoe were yeas 84 84 10. 60 11.49 : | | a Not used in calculations. When these four lots of apples were received, only a small amount of starch was present in the early-picked samples and in the late- picked Winesap, while the starch had entirely disappeared from the late-picked Ben Davis. On the date of the second examination, Jan- uary 19, 1903, the starch in all the samples had entirely disappeared. RESULTS wirH SAMPLES TAKEN OUT OF CoLD STORAGE. On this date samples were removed from cold storage and kept in a dry room in the laboratory at a temperature of about 70° F., where, owing to the dryness of the atmosphere, they lost their moisture con- tent rapidly; before they were finally discarded some apples were evidently drier than others, and in many cases while one side of the apple was firm and plump the other was dry and shriveled. On this account great care In sampling was necessary and in spite of all the precautions taken the variations in composition were greater than was desirable. It was necessary also to take larger samples for analysis than would otherwise have been used. 36 STUDIES ON APPLES. TasLe 1V.—Analyses of apples removed from cold storage and held in common storage. BEN DAVIS, PICKED AUGUST 15, 1902. =. | Polarization. Sucrose. Reduc- Serial| Date of | Total Acid as) Giarchi Berorel Ee By ing No. |analysis.| solids. malic. inver- | After inversion. | polari- | reduc- pel ce i sion. zation. | tion. ere 1903. Per cent. | Per cent. OV. ee GF Pervct.\ Per et-.\ Per et 2148 | Jan. 19 17. 02 0.589 | None. | —4.4 — 8.3 at 24 2.99 2.99 8.27 2614 | Jan. 27 16. 91 .600 | None. | —3.9 | — 8.7 at 21 3. 641 2.42 8.71 2715 | Feb. 5 17. 67 .482 | None. | —d. 85 — 8.9 at 22 2.34 2.18 9.51 2826 | Feb. 11 17.91 | .506 | None. |. —5.9 — 8.3 at 25 1.85 1.88 9. 34 2891 | Feb. 17 17. 47 | .372 | None. | —6.95 — 8.8 at21 1.74 ete 9. 64 3531 | Feb. 25 18. 48 .405 | None. | —6.7 — 8.8 at 23.5 R61 s| SS Pepe: 10. 44 3078 | Mar. 2 18. 71 .311 | None.-| —6.5 8.74 at 23.5 1.72 1.45 10. 56 3724 | Mar. 16} 19.55 .250 | None. | —8.4 | —10.2 at 21.3 1.39 1.18 11.69 4464 | Mar. 28 | ~~ 20.26 255 , None. | —8. 25 —10.1 at 22.2 1.41 1.14 11.59 4659 | Apr. 13 | 21.34 918 | None. | —8.5 | —10.12at22.5| 1.23 .93 | 12.12 BEN DAVIS, PICKED SEPTEMBER 15, 1902. ls 190322 4 | 9150 | Jan. 19| 16.52/ 0.543 | None. | —3.9 | — 8.6 at 24 3.61 | 3.62] 7.49 2615 | Jan. 27| 16.69| .519| None.| —5.0 | — 8.8 at 21 2.88 | 43.48) 7.88 2716 | Fe». 5d FESY/ .426 | None. | —o9.0 — 9.1 at 22 3.14 j- 3.08 8:59 2827 | Feb. 11 17. 29 .401 | None. | —4.9 — 8.3 at 25 2:62) | 1a2248) | = (Shae 2892 | Feb. 17} 18.10 .306 | None. | —o.3 — 9.7 at 2l 204 A OA a EO aot 3532 | Feb. 25 18. 27 . B98 | None. | —6.2 — 9.4 at 23.5 2.45 | 2.52] 9.87 3579 | Mar. 2 18. 53 .320 | None. | —5.0 = FS at 2h 2 228 2 eee 2A Peery ai2o |) Wars lb js 19-54 .260 | None. | —7.75 | — 9.79 at 21.5 | 1.55 |} 1.78) 11.52 4465 | Mar. 28 20. 92 251 | None. | —7.4 | 10 sat 2252) = 2206) le 85 10.16 4660 | Apr. 13| 20.77 | 228 | None. | —8.5 | —11.0 at 22.5} 1.91 | 1.38 | 11.96 | | | WINESAP, PICKED AUGUST 15, 1902. | | | | 1903. | | 2149 | Jan. 19 17.06 | 0.569 | None. | —4.8 —7.25 at 24 | 1.88 (|) LTE 9588 2616 | Jan. 27 LTT | .o74 ! None. | —5d.5 — Sob able ie Sz 142 10. 70 2717 | Feb. 5 18.35 .413 | None. | —6.45 — S02 ab 22) | ee Lote 11. 69 2828 | Feb. 11 18.13 | .450 | None. | —5.8 —8.0 at25 | 1.69 1.19 PleT5 2893 | Feb. 17| 17.40 .412 | None. | —6.3 —7.9 at 21 TE OS Y reg 18) 10. 99 3533 | Feb. 25 | 18.87 .369 | None. | —6.8 —8.3 at 23.5 LL | -- -22 01 12.19 3080 | Mar. 2| 18.44 375 | None. | —6. 25 | —7.6 at 23.5} 1.11 .89 11.58 3726 | Mar. 16 19. 09 | .340 | None. | —7.05 6582 at 2 On eee eee .74 11. 82 4466 | Mar. 28 20. 88 | .281 | None. | —7.9 —9. 35 at 22.2 LO) 283-[)) tor 4661 | Apr. 13 20.79 250 | None —7, 95 | —9.57 at 22.5 a a Le . 83 13.13 | | | WINESAP, PICKED SEPTEMBER 15, 1902. =k See 2s “ a sf : ———.— 1903. 2161 | Jan. 19 16. 65 0.610 | None. | —4.3 —7.5 at 24 2.46 2.01 9, 28 2617 | Jan. 27 17.29 .643 | None. | —4.7 —8. 05 at 21 9.5449 Se )9G8h 2718 | Feb. 5 17. 83 | .543 | None. | —5.4 -—8. 50 at 22 QS Meo oae 10. 63 2829 | Feb. 11 18. 41 514 | None. | —5.8 —8.7 at 25 POA Ys) Wore Bi ga fil 10. 92 2894 | Feb. 17 18. 50 424 | None. | —6.5 —9. 07 at 21 US Ta Reese Bone -f~ 3584 | Feb. 25] 18.75| .415 | None. | —6.3 —8.83 at 23.5 | 1.94] 1.59] 11.86 3581 | Mar. 2 18. 29 .38) | None. | —6.1 —8.3 at 23.5 1.68 | 1.35) 11.05 3727 | Mar. 16 19.69 310 | None. | —7.4 —8. 53 at 21.5 . 85 | 1.29 12.19 aNot used in calculations. 11.30 a11.49 11. 83 adi 3s 12.29 12.31 11. 92 13.39 110 13. 44 11.71 12.56 13. 24 12.40 12.18 13. 25 12. 52 12.59 13.38 14.01. The results of the analyses of the apples removed from cold storage and kept in the laboratory appear in Table 1V, and they are shown graphically in figures 7, 8, 9, and 10. In spite of the irregularity of the curves it will be noticed that the apples ripened much more rapidly than those kept in cold storage, and that, before the samples were ist. # Ree Me semis oe ems ot ope | STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. =| PETE EEE EEE % CT 70 Pe BARRA ADR R RRA CCCPEEErn rE (Soi aS KEPT IN COLD STORAGE b = Removed TO Room 70°F. Removed To Cear 60° F, CC vA 10 STUDIES ON APPLES. 38 *(SISBV SPILOS [BJ0}) 0381048 JO SUOT}Ipuod SuLAIVA Jopun 4doyx pur ‘Z06T ‘Gl Joqurejdeg poxord sojdde dvsourA, JO SoSA[BUB JO S}[NSAI SULMOYS JIBYO—'OL “Ol AVANT bocipidy T uvN Tega dT poet nvr [ Coeio3g [AON [ 190 [| tdgG TT Sny TAA UT NAP OA SECT | EG BT) HA VSR * | cz eo € $2 yh Ub Mw a a 7 2 92 L u HOROURUROONRE DAUR EEUU RO NMERRURD RNR UONREN AREA ARRAREEREREEE EC EEEEEEEE Eee ESSE i PETE Meee eee eee ccadtoe PET naan aiALAE i Ser SEL EEE EEE EEE TT % (an i Pt HE HAUL cn F L | HH Hit cE mile Eas) et ete 2S eas Ea ate anne auatt Pe CoCo HL aa wmjace +H : ————4,0/ Wooy a Gow3y i i +H { ————— aninis ogni ay BORROTEEEE PE HEE CHET rT iat Danae Bam — ~ a STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. ov destroyed by rot, they had closely approximated ‘the composition attained by the apples in cold storage some months later. That is, the percentage of total sugars expressed as invert sugar and of acids expressed as malic acid reached about the same figure in those kept in the laboratory as was reached at a later date in those kept in cold storage. In one respect, however, the composition of the Ben Davis stored in the laboratory changed in a manner very different from that of the sample kept in cold storage: In the former the sucrose decreased before A pril 13, 1903, until it reached a lower figure for sucrose than was found. for the cold storage apples on April 27, 1904, more than twelve months later. The apples ripened in the laboratory contained a higher percentage of invert sugar and a lower percentage of cane sugar than ‘those ripened in cold storage at the time when each of them was ren- dered useless by decay. In the case of the Winesap apples, however, this difference in the changes in sucrose and invert sugar does not obtain. Approximately the same minimum for the sucrose was reached in the apples stored in the laboratory as in those in cold stor- age, the latter having reached a minimum sucrose content about Octo- ber 21, 1903, approximately seven months after the laboratory sample had been rendered useless by decay. It appears, so far as can be determined from this work, that the changes in composition (the content of starch, sugar, and acids) in cold storage do not greatly differ from those which occur in common stor- age, the chief difference being in the rapidity with which the changes take place. At the same time, the fact that the changes which take place in storage at ordinary temperatures give higher maximum values for invert sugar and lower minimum values for sucrose in some instances than those occurring in cold storage is worthy of consideration and further study. Asan illustration of this may be noted the scalding of apples in cold storage. Scald is probably caused or accompanied by a chemical change, but as yet this can not be demonstrated by chemical analysis. On May 5, 1903, samples were removed from cold storage and placed in a cellar temperature at about 60° F. Only one subsequent analysis of the apples so stored was made. They remained in good condition during the greater part of the summer, keeping much better than other cold storage apples bought on the market and removed to the same cellar and better than some apples removed directly from the trees to the cellar. The apples of both varieties picked on August 15, 1902, remained firm and in good condition until the latter part of July, 1903, and the last of them gave way to decay about the Ist of October, 1903. It was noticeable that a change in the ripening of all varieties occurred about October 1, 1903. After that period the ripening progressed somewhat more slowly than before. At the same time the apples 40 STUDIES ON APPLES. e which previously had been sound now began to decay. It is suggested that the two conditions may be due to the same cause; that is, the loss of vitality of the apples may have exposed them to decay and rot, or at least made them less resistant to rot, and at the same time may have led to slower changes in the composition of the fruit. As has been suggested in other connections, the apparent retarding in the ripening process may have been due to the greater susceptibility to decay of the ripest apples, and consequently to an increase in the percentage of the relatively greener apples on each successive examination. THE RESPIRATION OF APPLES IN COMMON AND COLD STORAGE. On October 20, 1902, a barrel of Ben Davis apples, grown at South Onondaga, N. Y., was secured for respiration experiments. DESCRIPTION OF APPARATUS AND METHODS EMPLOYED. Three stone jars of the form shown in figure 11 were secured as containers. These jars were the ordinary glazed stoneware chlorin Fic. 11.—Jar used in respiration experiments. generators with stoneware covers having a ground joint. As shown in the illustration, the jars were arranged to afford the passage of a slight current of air. A guard tube of soda lime, then a drying tube of eal- cium chlorid, and then a tube of moist pumice stone were connected in series before the apparatus. The last-named tube was for the purpose of moistening the air which passed through the apparatus, as the pas- sage of a dry current of air would desiccate the apples and cause them to shrink abnormally. The tube of calcium chlorid just before the pumice stone was used in order that by repeated weighings of the latter the amount of water carried over into the jar with the current of air might be determined. Connected in series after the generator were ee ne Ce ee ee STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 41 two caleium-chlorid tubes followed by two soda-lime tubes. The end of the second soda-lime tube contained calcium chlorid to prevent the loss of water from the soda lime. Finally there was a guard tube of soda lime. The current of air for this purpose was afforded by two bottles, one of which was filled with water and stood on a table, while the other was empty and was placed on the floor. Each bottle was 28 7 #17 +27 ~+7 ~#17 27 6 6 2 6 16 2 4 [apr] MAY JUNE J yuey TAG SEPT. 1903} J Cold storage Cellar temperature -------- Fic. 12.—Chart comparing results of analyses of Ben Davis apples used in respiration experiments and kept in cold storage and-at cellar temperature (total solids basis). closed with a two-holed stopper. A tube connected the bottom of the first bottle with the second, and each bottle was connected with one end of the train of absorption tubes, the full bottle acting as an aspirator, while the empty one supplied the pressure. The current of air entered the jar through a delivery tube, passed to the bottom of the jar, and issued from a delivery tube leading from the top. The three 492 STUDIES ON APPLES. jars were weighed and filled with apples taken from the same lot. One of the jars was placed in cold storage at a temperature of about 0° C. (32° F.); the second jar was placed in a cellar temperature of about 60° F.; the third jar was also placed in cold storage, but, instead of being supplied-with a current of air, it was sealed and not opened until September 19, 1903, when an analysis of the contents of the jar, both the apples and the gas, was made. In the case of the fruit in cold storage difficulty was experienced in several instances when the temperature read slightly below the freezing point, the water freezing in the tube connecting the two bottles. This difficulty was overcome by dissolving salt in the water employed to furnish a current of air. RESULTS OF RESPIRATION EXPERIMENTS. The results of the examination of the apples employed for the respi- ration experiment are given in the graphic chart shown in figure 12 and in Table V. These results coincide in a general way with the experiments in common storage and in cold storage already described. The fruit kept at a higher temperature ripened much more rapidly than that kept in cold storage. Moreover, the sucrose reached a lower minimum and the invert sugar a higher maximum in the experi- ‘ments conducted at the higher temperature. These facts also confirm those obtained in earlier experiments. As in the case of other experi- ments previously described (p. 39), the sucrose of the apples kept in cold storage reached a minimum about the same time (in this case June 16, 1903) that the invert sugar of the same apples reached a maximum. After that date the percentage of sucrose increased and the percentage of invert sugar decreased. It is again suggested that this may be due to the selective tendency of the rot of the apples, whether the rot was due to bacteria, fungus growths, or to physio- logical death; and further, that the more mature apples may be more subject to decay than the less mature, whatever the cause of the decay. During the progress of the experiments the carbon dioxid and water were determined at short intervals, usually daily, up to the time when the experiments at cellar temperature were discontinued owing to the exhaustion of the sample. At this time the apples in cold storage began to rot and the increased amount of carbon dioxid given out vitiated any conclusions which might have been drawn from the work had it been longer continued. The amounts of carbon dioxid given off from both jars are shown graphically in figure 12. On eom- paring the amount of carbon dioxid eliminated with the malic-acid curve it hardly seems possible that the carbon dioxid can be accounted for by the disappearance of malic acid, as several workers, notably Gerber (see p. 19), have considered to be the case. On the other hand, the curve representing the content of total carbohydrates, 43 STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. ‘SUOI}B[NI[BO UL posn JON a “O91 BP SI] LoIJB JUOSGB YOIBS p ‘SISA[BVUB. JO 91Bp 9Y} 0} dn poULIOF prxOrp UOGIBdD [B10] 9YY JO osB] UDdIOd OY] MOYS WUIN[OS SIG) UL SeINSY OYLo ‘SOSA[BUB JO SOIBP UIIMJO POULOJ PLIXOIp UOGIVS JO 98R J UDdIOd PUR IYSIOM OY} MOYS SUUINOD dSoy} UT SoInSY OUT, @ ‘yuoo red ¢°9 Aq poonpos SUONBULULIOJOP YOIRIS v OF8P - IEP” GBOE * Lb&s “0 OPP LT LOLs T POSS “T OZ2T “TL T¥s0 1 8668 ° Pr6L © PGLG ° CZLZ “0 UI) Lad 0°07 Bp 4B prxo -Ip MOqaBo [VIO P8FO° 89¢ °9 OSI ° OL0 “6T TPLO* 646 LT TPES 0 99 LP 80L0° SIG '% £960 ° G86 P8CT- 669 °8 6480" LOT 9 SPSL” [80 LT PSOT * O6L OT 1613" LOS VG 620 * L6L 68 gor'0 | 199/87. VU) ba * “SUDLY) q’PIXOIp WOGIvd JO OSBOTOUT “OSOIDUS UOIR ZLIB Od AUNOLVAEd NAL UVTITHO LV SIAVG NH quaundadaa Uwoypudsas ur pasn sayddp fo saslijnuy— A XTAV J, eae See eal ORG 66° 69 0 RNa Saree Ten piene SO d ceed at ol ene 4 baaa (p) PES “0 9% PL 61 “ydesg | Z0zL ‘CH 0&8) (0 00 LV UVE GAIVAS ‘SIAVG Nad Pg ah See 06°8 88 °¢ 88°36 Tybee ge Ral Soya Bai ent. ae 696° L¥ ST IZ ‘ydag | T1%Z G8 Lh 89°T 68 TL 8°FS 1B FOL — CBE 0G “PL CT ounf’ | 88p9 90 °L 18 T OL] L638 9 9— CGP - L9 FL 9% ABIN | 0929 612 66 1 61% 6G 7B LE L— CEP SS Ret | eg aca ae C6 ~ LOL 8z “Idy | PI6G GOC “SL rn) 68 9 08 6 COS L°GG 78 TL 9— JE Aree abel ake paeence OP” 60 PL I§ “ABN | OCSP 006 “FL OF 6 60°L CGS Gh @°$o 18 16 4 — QOS Pee Be itay toee ties 90S * 1G PL G “ABIN | S8CE OLT‘9L 96 6 68 °9 866 PS Ga 1648 G°L— [tnt Se SIN eee ey 9¢9 ° $I CT LE “UBL | E19G 008 ‘LT 696 09 °9 &8°G 96 °% CIS’ PL— CoS Sonera oF 965° 19 FL g¢ “UBL | Zo8T “S061 Cag aaa LT‘OL yL 9 38° 68° 6648 9 °L— G— [L‘Ov 089 °0 OF SL 0G “390 | SPIT “LO6L ‘Cal 08) “0 00 LY SIAVG NAG ees nee 60°8 Tez PL* 69° CG4G-GT — CUO se |isew cham ate | $98 ° €8 “SL 8z ‘Idv | CT6¢ C&L ‘8 F0'S8 SPL 8g ° 68° G°GG 1B LE OL — (A lea iat) Regehr SN Bde SEs 6S “§T PL ‘idy | TL9P OSL ‘FP 66 °L 89 FO'L C00 “TL LG¢ 18 9 9— Ss Sete hs paar ar CPS © 8¢ SL O€ “IBIN | POPP O&F ¢ LG'8 69 °L 9§8 64° G66 YB TEL — 6: = LPS - 8Z SI ST “IABIN | SO8s 020 ‘2 4¢°8 69 L 06° OL Le C'S 1B Gh L— 09> 8ZE° 60 SL G “APIN | RCE 0GZ°8 68°8 9T LZ fist 836 1 1% 3B pO °L— Ge “g-- L8¢ © 94 SI 9T “Gout | 288% OL9 “6 LL 8 Gawd LS. 0 PPT 1638 0 245 [Sis 60F- C8 $1 Le “UBL | ZL9Z GZL “IT 866 69 °L qc ‘1 G8 "1° C1648 6° L— ¢'¢— P6E © 08 ST G Vea [CSL “$06 OF6 “ZL [€ 6 PEL 88 1 GL SG LG3B 2 = Ons GO" P SPP’ PL PL LT “90d | CLIT 020 “OT 86 6 Is ‘9 10°§ 60S 0698 LL Gates 00° IGP * 88 FL L ‘AON | SCTT Hime ges olen ice OE PL '9 &8 § 686 Teaver Cem IZ 0 089 °0 OP ST 0@ 390 | SPIT “SUUDLY) “YUID AO | “WUId MA | “UII dag PUD) Ma 79) (0) ‘Ao ‘Ao WUD LOT PUI) hag PUI) bad “GOBL “UOIs “UOT RZI “UOISIOAUT ioe i ven ee, 0 Ae ES 7 “UOISIOAUTL LOUP VV se ; | ‘sojdde yo Beate Bate SENN Aq eile Ad » dLOJO tae “ony ‘sprfos. | ‘sisAeUe) ow VUSIOM Iejoy, |Buronpoy S¥Y ploy [B10], JO 018 | ;elreg 44 STUDIES ON APPLES. expressed as invert sugar, is approximately the reverse of the curve representing the evolution of carbon dioxid. The probability that the carbon dioxid results from the decomposition of carbohydrate bodies is strengthened by the fact that after protracted storage the apple has apparently lost vitality, and changes in composition proceed much more slowly than in the early days of storage. It is probable that at this time the quantity of carbon dioxid given.off by reason of the original transpiration of the sound apple would be considerably less than when chemical processes were more vigorous. 1.055]. 4.75 5. 85 43.12 b6851 | July 11 | 13.89 j-== ===] -33 —3.30 | —6.35 at 26 g-dl | 2232 | 6232 8.76 40. 54 6842 | July 7 | 13.47 . 98 2.34 |—3.60 | —5. 65 at 30 fe Gleateetl 6451) 574093 6. 66 47. 06 6845 | July 10 13.7 1.02 2.86 |—4.35 | —6.10 at 26 | 1:35] 1.38 5.19 6.64 | 52.92 6856 | July 15 | 13.62 | -.92 POGt 425 6 60 abs. | 6b) 1.620) 531 12 7,01 b- 7 50.62 6863 | July 17 | 14.16 | .88 2.24 |—4.0 | —8.03 at28 |¢3.14) 2.01 5. 56 7.68 63.5 b6907 | Aug. 5 | 13.39 . 61, -00 |—2.8 |—6.16 at 27.6 | 2.63 | 2.40| 5.76 8.38 58. 06 6883 | July 22 | 14.20 =D 1.78 |—3.0 | —7.92at28 |¢3.83} 2.70} 5.05) -7.89 64. 52 6888 | July 24 | 14. 84 76 299) 224, — 6.60 at 29 13029) 1 3-2) 5.15 8.53 67.70 6895 | July 29 | 14.82 | 70 1,19 |—2.4 |—6.7iat32 | 3.42] 3.10) 5.38 8. 64 64. 80 6901 | Aug. 5 | 15.14 | 76 -9f |—1.4 | —6.60 at 27.6-| 4.07 | 4.16 | 5.14 9.52 72.15 | | } | SUMMER APPLES—BOUGH. l | l 1903. | 6422 | June 11 | 13.49 | 0.295 2.00 |—3.4 |—3.4 at 25 0.00 0.06 5: Di) 504 37. 88 6520 | June 17 | 13.66 .315 2.47 |—3.75 | —4.4 at 26.2 so 61 5.40 | 6.04 55. 20 66752 | June 23 | 13.74 295 -76 |—3.0 |—4.3 at 2h 99 - 9, 6.03 | 7.02 51. 30 6777 | Jume 25 | 14. 44 248 2.52 |—3.8 | —5. 65 at 26 ee By eo, 5. 83 7.17% | 75.34 668,0 | July 3 | 18.95 |\..-...- 43 |—L.4 | —5.65 at 27 See | SOFT Oe 8. 58 | 64.00 6838 | July 2); 14.27 | -348 2.16 |—3.3 | —4.60 at 27 101s |e 1205 5. 92 7.02 | 96.94 b6852 | July 11 | 13.24 |\....-..: .36 |—4.15 | —6.2 at 26 UN TIA 7.04 | 8.76| 93.24 6843 | July 7 | 14.39 178 1.79 |—4.1 | —5.55 at 30 1.14 1.40 6. 22 7.69 104. 00 6846 | July 10 | 14.95 211 2.00 |—5.5 | —6.85 at 26 1.04] 1.10 7. 06 8.22 97.30 6857 | July 15 | 14.08 194 HAO E64 822) ab 2deo eee 42 | al 29 TAL | 58:00) 1082p 6864 | July 17 | 15.24 275 1.52 |—5.5 | —8.35 at 28 ESs00F Pe ris08) a tele 923s pL b6908 | Aug. 5 | 14.18 201 | 19 |—3.4 | —5.78 at 27.6 1.86 SO) |e eos 8. 02 119.40 6884 | July 22 | 15.42 181 | 2.13 |—3.5 | —5. 40 at 28 1.48 | 1.69 5.15 6.93 108.60 6889 | July 24 | 16.86 188 1.10 |—3.8 | —7.10 at 29 Yeites |e Baas: 6.88 | 9.54 | 126.30 6896 | July 29 | 16.78 | .164 | 2.43 |—4.3 | —7.26 at 32 2235 1582 |" 6.86 |- 8.78 98. 64 | | | | SUMMER APPLES—YELLOW TRANSPARENT 1903. 6421 | June 11 | 11.46 EL 1.49 |—3.2 | —3.85 at 25 0.50 0.38 3.70 4.10 | 30. 54 6521 | June 17 | 12.28 1. 44 1.41 |—3.2 | —4.84 at 26.2 0 77 hea kee? 5 4.4l | S91. > 132540 66753 | June 23 | 11.72 123 .30 |—3.4 | —5.06 at 24 1.28 UE! IG snOahda| a groleago 6778 | June 25 | 12.28 1.22 1.49 |—3.05 —5. 65 at 26 2.01 1.98 4.50 6.58 57.95 b6839| July. S$ 11-45 "\.-2...- {- .12 |—3.75 | —5.9 at 27 1. 67 1.63 6. 27 (LE 48. 30 6836 | July 2 | 12.96 ET 1.46 |—3.75 | —6.35at27 | 2.02 PAG 4.45 6. 67 76. 52 BE850' |) July 11) 12-21 |=. 2. 22. 04 |\—4.10 | —6.55 at 26 © 1.89 1.86 6.24 8.20 | 74.950 6844 | July 7 12.65); 1.00 -96 |—4.25 | —6. 75 at 30 1.96 | 1.93 5. 96 8.00 87.34 6847 July 10. 13.18 81 .60 |—4.05 | —7.10 at 26 PRE || DE BY) 6.18 8.67 | 91.78 6858 | July 15 | 13.39 . 96 yt \-4. 30") — 3 Ab 23. ly 2/30, 2.22) o-81 |. 8.15 | 89:60 6865 July 17 | 13.90 | -95 | 1.04 |—3.70 | —8.8 at 28 OSC foe 9in 5.96 |* 29.02} 97500 66909 | Aug. 5 | 13.40 61 09323) || —G-go ab 27.6 2.41 2.76 DeSSuln cane onl s 1Oouae 6885 | July 22 13.85 | °.89 |} . .87-—3.9 | —8.25 at 28 3.39 | 3.30 De 20 Salone eel Qa 6890 | July 24 | 14.62 .94 .39 |—3.2 | —7.6 at 29 Br Eee be 5. 93 QUE ale9 5 |/ —7.04 at 32 2.81 2.74 6.01 8.89 99.36 6394 July 29 | 13.99 | .79 53 |—3.! aStarch determinations reduced 0.5 per cent. b All figures in italics give analyses of apples held in the ice box since the preceding date. ' ¢ Not used in calculation, 46. -- STUDIES ON APPLES. TaBLeE VI.—Analyses of growing apples—Continued. WINTER APPLES—BEN DAVIS. Polarization. Sucrose. 3 |Reduc-| Total |,,.- : Acid ; ie Weight Serial| Date of | Total : Starch. |Before| E ‘By po-| By re-| ing su-| sugar a= No. | analysis. | solids. shane. ane After inver- joy i7a- duc- | 88% as as : apple | sion. SOR: | tion. | tion. ea ete ee | | | } | | | | 1903. | Perct.| Perct.| Per cent.| °V. | °V °C | Per ct.| Per ct.| Per ct. | Per ct. | Grams 6493 | June 16 | 13.63 | 1.64 2.23 |—1.3 | —2.0 at 25 0.54 | 0.49] 2.35 3.87.| 15.40 6833 | June 30 | 13.37 | 1.27 3.03 |—1.55 | —2.35 at 27 G24 te GF 3. 04 3.74 | 32.47 BESaS uy) AS | 1S. 58u|2 455. = 72 |\—1.8. |—3.4 at 23.5 | 1.23 |, -1.21 3.09 6.36 | 2. 11 6891 | July 28 | 15.71 . 89 3.67 |—2.65 | —3.96 at 32 1.04} 1.13 4,52 Spill 58. 60 6923 | Aug. 18 | 14.92 .78 Si Giese eee aes aces sae 1.46 4.36 5. 90 95.4 7258 | Sept. 24 | 15.05 5 5y. 2.40 "|escc co acei ee ce ee oto eee ban oe 7.56.| 130.2 7285 | Oct. 15 | 14.86 2 1246) Sass 3 a eee eee eee | 3:13) 5230 8.60 | 167.9 W294: |i OCts -23))| J4s82, | eee ee 294 \ooe.. oe] 2-8 ees cee ceeee| seeeer 3:92 | 5.53 9.60 | 149.5 7303 | Oct. 30 | 14.68 | .43, .38 |—1.7_ | —6.87. at 24.1 | 4.30| 3.87 | 5. 84 9.91 | 178.6 7308 | Nov. 5j| 15.73 Schl Boerne —1.95 | —7.15 at 23.7 | 3.99] 3.71] 95.83 9.74 | 147.4 | | WINTER APPLES—HUNTSMAN. | 1903. | | | | 6494 | June 16 | 12.75 | 1.43 | 1.55 |—1.2 | —1.76 at25 | 0.43 | 0.47 2.54 3. 04 | 15. 6834 | June 30 | 13.46 | 1.12 | 2.69 |—1.1 |—1.90at27 | .62 OOM eros 4.04} 31.70 a6s5, | July 13 | 12°96) Sj ose -69 |—1.7 —3.00 at 23.5 1.00 LOO n| Siroseen 6.26 | ~ 25.69 6892 | July 28 | 15.33 80 3.69 |--2.0 | —3.74 at 32 1538 -|) 124))_ 4530") = 526i) |= ogee 6924 | Aug. 18 | 14.07 60 Pe Peery mre RE Im cots eS Sek 1.78 4.08 5.95 | 98.50 7259 | Sept. 24 | 14. 03 Sie TOO: 42 25 SAS Se See ee a es | 3.09 5. 08 8.33) 118.9 7286 | Oct. 15 | 13.50 40 | SS UE Geeseed Iporeeeseaacaecelocescas | 3.65 5.56 9.40 , 163.6 B2ODE FOG. Zon las2osles ences Det) chs oe ali ees ee ee | ee | 4.82 4.98 | 10.05 166.8 7304 | Oct. 30 | 13.08 41 19 |+ .5 |—4.9 at24.1 | 4.49 | 4.26 4.82 pa a re ED 7309 | Nov. 5 | 13.39 OBO) |i ccece see + .3 | —5.55 at 23.7 | 4.49 | 4. 4.83 9.36 163.0 | { | | 1903. | | | | 6495 | June 16 | 13.57 | 0.38 1.98 |-1.9 |—2.2 at25 | 0.93] 0.32] 412|° 4.45) 18.35 6835 | June 30 | 12.60 164.» (2193 | 23 5) Sa ae a7 16 22} 4.00| 4.23| 29.63 a6855 | July 13 | 13.16 |...-.-. 61 |—-3.2 |—3.8 at 28.5 46| .41| 6.40| 6.88 | 25:41 6893 | July 28/14.30| .12| 2.42 |-2.9 |—3.74 at 32 67| .77| 5.53| 6.34| 55.19 6925 | Aug. 18 | 14.07 12, 159-15 69: [2 ha ee eee ea 1.09| 5.58] 6.68| 97.56 7260 |.Sépt: 24 | 13:88:| G09] | Sketg) | soe ele ee ee eee 1.93] 5.44| 7.47] 144.8 7287 | Oct. 15 | 14.40} .10 Mite Pe MM Seedy 2.35| 6.37] 8.84] 94.96 7296 | Oct. 23 | 14.22 |....... 1 SS Blame ho Sb ie aaa rim 2.90} 6.58} 9.63| 140.9 7305 | Oct. 30|14.22| .12| .28 |—3.2 |—7.1 at24.1| 3.99] 2197|° G74) 9.871 deers 7310 | Nov. 5|13.93| .09| None. |—4.1 |—8.2 at23.7| 3.14] 2.51| 6.72| 9.36] 105.4 | | | | a All figures in italics give analyses of apples held in the ice box since the preceding date. Discussion OF CHANGBS OCCURRING DURING GROWTH. In terms of total solids the composition of the summer apples is shown graphically in figures 13 to 15, inclusive. The results of this work give a much more complete account of the life history of the apple than was obtained in the previous year. By referring to the graphic chart for the Early Strawberry (fig. 18) as an illustration of the summer apples, it is seen that the starch content increased from June 11, 1903, the date of the first examination, until June 25, when the maximum starch content was attained. From that time until August 5 the starch steadily decreased. and on that date the sample examined still contained 6 per cent of starch based on the total solid content of the apple. The apples were not in a good state of preservation, however, for by this time all had fallen from the trees and none in a condition suit- STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 47 able for analysis could be obtained. ‘The last stages of ripening, therefore, could not be followed. ‘This same observation is true of the other varieties of summer apples. No sample could be obtained which became fully ripe in the chemical sense—that is, in which the starch had completely disappeared. In the first sample of summer apples examined very little sucrose CAE ce ae Lie te Y * | Net TS ee NUTTY HTN N BERN NS, HE NT ‘ Ht Hh be HUE HL EELS | nH bee d TTT Z| a (xem eal oa ea SS Ea Ee SE (a Be J ee EN VR da eT el PS a a a >< Se Refrigerated subsamples --------- Fic. 13.—Chart showing chemical changes in summer apples (Early Strawberry) during growth (total solids basis). was found, showing that the work was begun early in the life history of the fruit. The content of sucrose increased steadily, however, until the end of the experiment. It is specially noteworthy that the per- centage of sucrose increased even while the starch was forming. At the beginning of this work the sample contained a larger percentage 48 STUDIES ON APPLES. of invert sugar than starch and.the percentage of invert sugar increased steadily until the sample was examined on July 4. Later the percentage of invert sugar decreased. This does not mean, how- ever, that an actual loss of invert sugar is indicated, as will be seen by consulting figure 21, in which the composition of the fruit in grams TETHER ELT TTT Tg ag SU UAGEEATATTTHEERD Hite HEU ARSE ELEC GNOIOHOMONGWGUONBNGAE ci HH RRIF ARNG REAR RRR RN DZ Ae NUE A . 4 \| N a ELEN NSPE AACN tHE BRAUER See ag BEREShaAL if ace \ GAB RGRED S| Esl [ras ees] Ss] ER Se eae RSE ky |_| eal N \ AA re ee Bei ec Sa | a NI fe af | | | aes = ae al eS INS ia Eves 4 JS AO AN = Ne! Sees iannend | = aa i au | HR ails hic. 14.—Chart showing chemical changes in summer apples (Bough) during growth (total solids basis). per apple is given. The reason for the apparent loss of invert sugar—- that is, for the decrease in the percentage of invert sugar—is due to the rapid growth of the seh s after the date mentioned. This growth of the apples after July 2 amounted, in the case of the Karly Straw- berry apple, to 29 grams, the weight increasing from 43 grams on July 2 to 72 grams on August 5. STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 49 . In figure 16 the average composition of the three varieties of sum- mer apples during growth is shown graphically in the form of com- posite curves. In this it is seen that the conclusions already drawn from the Early Strawberry apple were true of each of the varieties. The curves representing the content of each of the substances deter- SSS) (SS SSS2/ 9S] ASS] SSS SS SSS SSeS nS | SS Bee Al Refrigerated subsamples - ------- Fig. 15.—Chart showing chemical changes in summer apples (Yellow Transparent) during growth (total solids basis). | mined from time to time in the summer apples are very irregular. | This is apparently due to the fact that summer apples usually do not ripen with the uniformity of later varieties. An effort was made at the beginning to secure apples of uniform ripeness, but in spite of | 27981—Bul. 94—05 —4 50 STUDIES ON APPLES. this it doubtless happened that in some cases a larger percentage of relatively green apples was obtained than in others. In addition to this, the chemical composition. of the apples changes very rapidly after they are picked from the trees. This is a matter which was not well understood at the beginning of the work and the error caused FLETHETEEEEEEE it rh riGg. lo.—Chart showing thereby fe was not guarded average chemical changes during growth in the three summer varieties | (total solids basis). against : is fully as it might have been. Owing to the fact that the apples were grown in West Virginia, from twenty-four to thirty-six hours elapsed from the time they were picked until analysis was begun in the laboratory. It was supposed that this lapse of time would not cause great changes in the composition of the pees meer vig yt re ! —R SS SS ss :hLlhUre Sh STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. Sul apples, but it was found that such was not the case. At each picking the sample was divided into two portions, one of which was placed in a refrigerator at a temperature of from 12° to 15° C. (58.6° to 59° F.), and the apples so kept were examined after the lapse of several days. The results of the examinations of these subsamples which were kept in the refrigerator are printed in italics in Table VI, and they are also expressed on the charts (figs. 13 to 16) by dotted lines. Referring to figure 13, in which the composition of the Karly Straw- berry apples, based on total solids, is shown graphically, it is seen that the composition of the sample of apples received June 17, 1903, changed with remarkable rapidity. The sample at that time contained 24 per cent of starch, 4.6 per cent of sucrose, and 24 per cent of invert sugar. After being kept in the refrigerator six days, it was examined and found to contain 5.9 per cent of starch, 12.9 per cent of sucrose, and 38.2 per cent of invert sugar. Thus, in six days the apples which were picked from the trees and kept in the dark at a temperature con- siderably lower than that to which those remaining on the trees were exposed, contained less starch than the apples which ripened fully on the trees forty-three days later, and almost as high a content of invert sugar. At the same time it must be borne in mind that the apples remaining on the trees during this period continued to grow the whole time, whereas the transformation of starch in case of the apples stored in the ice box was limited to a few days. For this reason the parallel drawn is not entirely applicable. On several succeeding dates the samples drawn from the trees were preserved in the refrigerator for a few days with similar results. It was found with each successive picking that apples which were stored in the refrigerator developed somewhat more slowly than on the pre- ceding occasion. Thus, each succeeding curve representing the change of the apples kept in the refrigerator is a little less vertical than that preceding it. This demonstrates that the less mature the fruit is when gathered the more rapid are the changes tending to maturity after picking. It would seem, therefore, that, from a commercial stand- point, apples which are fairly mature may be expected to retain a more constant composition than those picked in an immature state. The same generalization also applies to the charts representing the changes in composition in other varieties of summer apples, and are especially borne out in the composite chart (fig. 16), which gives the average of the results obtained with the three varieties of summer apples. ; The work on the winter apples was much more satisfactory than that on the summer appies, because of the fact that they ripened more simultaneously and the problem of securing a representative sample was not so difficult. For this reason the curves representing the changes of composition of the winter apples (as shown by figures 17 5Y STUDIES ON APPLES. to 20, inclusive) are much more uniform than in the charts just preced- ing, which represent the composition of the summer apples. The work on the winter apples began on June 16, 1903, and extended until November 5, 1903. These curves illustrate much better the early life history of the fruit than those representing the work of the previous year. As in that year, the sucrose curve is almost exactly the reverse of the starch curve. This is only true, however, after the maximum content of starch has been reached, which was between June 30 and July 28 with the Ben Davis apples, on July 28 with the Huntsman apples, and on June 30 with the Winter Paradise apples. It must be understood that no one of these dates is suggested as the exact date of the maximum content of starch in the apple. It is only intended to represent the maximum cortent of starch on the various dates when the apples were examined. On the whole, however, the maximum content can not have varied greatly from the date given, and the maximum percentage determined must also be approximately correct. The observation as to the uniformity of results applies equally to all of the determinations made. On the date of the first examination— June 16—the content of sucrose based on total solids was 4 per cent. The percentage of sucrose increased regularly until the last examina- tion, which was made on November 5, when it amounted to 25.4 per cent of the total solid content of the.apple, the rate of increase being apparently no greater before the maximum content of the starch than afterwards. It would appear that during its own growth and accumu- lation a portion of the starch is converted into sucrose. Unlike the summer apples, the percentage of invert sugar here increased from the date of the first examination to approximately the date of the last, so that even in percentage composition the amount of invert sugar present did not reach its maximum until the maturity of the fruit. In all three of the varieties of winter apples studied the percentage of malic acid decreased from the first examination to the full maturity of the fruit. The percentage of total sugar estimated as invert sugar increased steadily from the first examination to full maturity. It is a notable fact that after the maximum content of starch is reached the percentage of starch and invert sugar taken together remains approximately constant. As in the case of the preceding studies, the average composition of the three varieties of winter apples has been expressed in the form of a composite chart which is given in figure 20. In many respects it was considered that a graphic statement showing the actual increase in weight of the various constituents of the apple determined would have a more definite meaning than the changes in_ chemical composition on the percentage basis. Before examination each sample was weighed so that the data were secured for this caleu- lation. In figures 21 to 28 the changes of the apples just considered, both summer and winter varieties, are represented in terms of grams per apple, 53 STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. SRHORUUSLIOOLE 7 Hit | HE Th i inn Hl rT Tor t Tt HD i Coe eal a oo ULL HL TEE rte pe ae il anHoez aot nn i nat i Ci ra +H | cit a A AAGHRRRRENUEHE a : I Poo a anit r PoC I DUUMAGNOAD oo HOMERS UEEe Poe ee MOUUOORUREN sannnnnnnanull BanLOOH HUGHHERRE Mean ‘ iain ORAAOUT at ar! Wadi 4 TELL 6 eee NGHEEEERURRL SUCHORROOERREEIR SNRGHUERERREE OUKBEROROROEEE \ Fie. 17,—Chart showing chemical changes in winter apples (Ben Davis) during growth (total solids basis). ES. ON APPL a ES STUDI CE SIRE *(SISQ SPI[OS [B}0]) [JMOIZ Zutinp (uBursjunyZ) solddv 10,UIM Ul sosuUBYyd [ROTUIOYO SULMOYS WBYO—'ST “OI oe iil - ee oe oe el PS BBB ees Bi Sib VAbseaRseay 54 i D5 STORAGE, RESPIRATION, ANID GROWTH. 0s % *(SISB SPILOS [BI0OL) YIMOLS SuULINp (OSIpvIV_ 10]UTM\) Sopddv 10, UIM UL sodUBYO [BOLMLOYO SULMOYS JAVYO—'6L * y 1snonw ! Ae Cr Ane OT | SNOF 01 02 oe Ov 0s 09 ON APPLES. STUDIES 56 09 02 aa LAT LL vad POA er aH Tato oT TT ° TTT STORAGE. RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 5 He HE rr [|| | ite Ul HY JUNE 1903. JULY 1903 a 1903. Refrigerated subsamples -------- Fic. 21.—Chart showing chemical changes during growth of summer apples (Early Strawberry )—in grams per apple. aaneee a) } Refrigerated subsamples -------- Fig. 22.—Chart showing chemical changes during growth of summer apples (Bough)—in grams per apple. EAS ae Oars eS ee eT AUGUST 1908. q o— - = = 5 5 7 Z a a wil - Z Mi ba 2 Z he 3 — " ci 5 Awa = oT > tL 9 S © ain = ef Z Ps om cf a Seles Vas 6 “e g [ae |S ra Sh = ae a a =i a mx 1S _| , 8 PY Avge Ee amit [aie be oR ae ios ae ESN nL ia Soe if eee ae Cal ha fe lhe alone ae hee ee 8 leases a ao) a eee | fo) 5 4 Ge 2 Hy =ie.|| 4 26 a eige = ce <= joy — Le yD aes, ale a eS i A ee nn a a5 «ff é fl PAs a 2 28 o ia 2» (ape ea Se |S Pa ae ee See z ae mn aos eal eal sees eel oS] = 2 of Ee (SP Seen eg sa ed | pea 5 a 3 Fe (ame a ea fe Bd 5s 3s = Be ea oes eee [eres nae ee (| a = a= (eee FSS (Se a a | & 22 iE peu peal = = im (epee (oe aaa eS =e = ot pees (Cast (Sine ee ee I Pa e a Pas MS (Ee esc MS a) @ 2 (er oe ee BP E : [ST ct al Cac (a a i Re “ a ope eran ers [ | Pe [ee = calves Wel o (pe a er oe a “A So AVS Ld bo [cea ess ee oe } E N \ o) a pe Cy (ee (a Nes ad \ : a z [=e ae eas Pa ad ; E s £ a el a BRA Dd SST 7 2 a Ee atl besifaed eel as a s E Se) aa a a as Z 3 p r=] (>| - 5 I eS ee ees S) ae el Se es a 3 eS eee | ae cereal ae ee [cos eee ama [es L BB ea Seah Sew gS Fee a ee Pe (es Ee ie a es a “i tg [pe | en TN . el) ee ee : oO in = M 2 = = | Vers) . = a to or Q = =] = iv) } = oS e) er @ 5 ° S ° = 2S S| oe @ w Qu GS 5 = i=) GQ ge rs fo) = SE o) Lone) = 2) ct @ 5 © Ke) = @ A ite oe) @ =) is) © = Kc oF i=) tee} i] E Q uo} oO 5 ~ uo} i 2 ea8w j10dI5% 438.0190 Ma PT TM B | al = Ba te Bi Ty Tr RH KH 158) Bl wl Bl Bi 4 Ty Ty 4 Bint wi Bil PT STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. Eaee Eee cH : Eee REA oo SNES! Hoy | rT | FEC ESHaPz Booze pa | i: a Deze bales Py Ty HiDBOEBEEEa HIMNESS Es eaasS [Ff 4 CTY Bae [any os gt] fn ns | es] BICWBAl) Jee BGR NERS LTT leas Te BIBER BRERA EEe CT TT Cas) SESE oe SIBSER tees BiBeaD TTT oC TT Th ) GDB hae Wy Ty Ty Ba 11 oe eee ject owe Eee [TWSt TT Ty SSG eESeaa BGGavAbSaeee CCC BEaea' NEBSORRSRRBaae RSENS Sb Ree Oo sebSRESeeoooa Gia GOBER ehSaaeheaeaa' Bs ped Hee HERE EEE EEE EEE Statatete else SUeSSESEUEEGEEEE anf ffl ff ead EBOSSOS lee oR COON CEN ES. DIES ON APPL STU 60 AON | 4390190 PEEDEPeES ie Seok WSS ak a eae) 61 STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. ¥390190 ‘o[ddv riod survis ul— ve (OSIPBIBY IOJUIA\) S ¥3IBWI1dIS o[ddv 191UIM JO YIAMoI8 ulmnp SoSUBYD [BVOIMIOYO SUIMOYS WABYO— "LZ “OTT EESEEESSERRENNe DURES eee AN ON APPLES. STU DIES 62 4 ‘ojddv iod survis UI—poulumvxo s0[ddv¥ 10JUIM JO SOIJOLIBA J0IY} OY} UT SOSULYID [BOTUIOYD OSRIOAB SUIMOYS JIVYO—'SzZ “DIA 3 vaa0190 SELEFTED hana CO MEET Ae aneRmein PONIES A Ise 82 0 HOO scsRhepenneee SS | Ay vapepeedt | TT TT er ———— NG EBBEEEEESESMNRIBe BESS GEBERESSS0S5N SNES SSESERSRR WSRRSESERREa 0)\2a SSREBESERERSA GREE SSeeaaIS + tt tes HH ne ripe : : H H | |] a : aa ! we tats] $+ 4+-4+-+4-4 > STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 63 In the case of the summer apples the curves representing the changes of composition in terms of grams per apple, as in the preceding charts in which percentage composition alone was represented, are very irregular, owing to the fact, as previously stated, that it was very dif- ficult to secure a representative sample, the season of ripening being so irregular that it was impossible to secure samples having an equal number of relatively ripe apples. Irregularities of the curves in fig- ures 21 to 24, representing the summer apples, are due to this fact. In the charts just mentioned the actual weight of starch increased from the date of the first analysis until July 17 in the case of the Karly % | | | % Lt ++ ul at 60 60) \ Gg Be ‘\ 70 5 n . mt 4} wy iN 60 6) uae 50 2 SO TTT rc PEt a EET 40 | » +14 Pept pp 30 E) 3 Pen MT 20) RT 20 } jt in | | + Cc. N i Be h | Je We AL Ml] z ; f aS > IS 10 is Pe 10 1 pay S820 ig Tal cH A % | 41 021 “27. a4 a= 4 18 at 30 7 oH Subsamples stored in dark -------- Fig. 29.—Chart showing results of analyses of growing apples by Lindet (calculated to an assumed basis of 20 per cent of total solids). Strawberry apples, and until July 2 in the case of the Yellow Trans- parent. The percentage of starch in the Yellow Transparent apples remained almost constant until July 23. The irregularities in the curves representing the starch content in the Bough apples were so great as to render conclusions from this curve impracticable. It is probable that the maximum starch content of this variety was attained on July 2, the same date as in the case of the Yellow Transparent. On two subsequent occasions, however (July 22 and 29), a higher content of starch was noted, but on each of these dates the content of sucrose 64 STUDIES ON APPLES. was correspondingly lower than would have been expected from pre- ceding and succeeding analyses. On account of the irregularities in the starch content of the Bough apples, the last of the curve representing the starch content of the composite sample is of little value, and the same is true of the curve representing sucrose. On the whole it is apparent that the starch content increased until the early part of July, after which it steadily decreased. On the other hand, the sucrose content increased regularly from the first analysis to the full maturity of the fruit. The same is true of the invert sugar. Turning now to the succeeding charts (figs. 25 to 28) the curves representing the changes of composition of the winter apples are again found to be more satisfactory than in the case of the summer apples. Owing to the more uniform ripening of this fruit and the consequent greater uniformity attained in the selection of samples, the curves are much more regular. The maximum content of starch in winter apples was attained on August 18, at least a month later than in the case of the summer apples just considered. After reaching the maximum starch content the sucrose increased. more rapidly than before and maintained a fairly rapid increase until the apples were fully matured. The content of invert sugar, total sugar, total carbo- hydrate, and total solids remained reasonably constant from the first analysis to the full maturity of the fruit. In the series of plattings indicated by the star after the date of analysis (figs. 25, 27, and 28), the analyses were calculated to the weight of the largest average weight of apples received up to the time when analyzed, as the sample received consisted of smaller apples. As in the case of the summer apples duplicate samples were taken, one of which was subjected to analysis immediately on its receipt in the laboratory, the other being placed in a refrigerator and allowed to stand for some time before it was examined. Owing to the press of other work, however, examinations of these subsamples were not made. In figure 29 are given representative results obtained by Lindet which illustrate somewhat more clearly the change of composition of apples during ripening than does the tabular form in which they were given by the author. The apples were of cider varieties. The results as given by him were entirely on the original composition of the apples. The content of water was not given, and for the calculation of the fig- ures here given a total solid content of 20 per cent was assumed. While this is probably not entirely correct, it can not be greatly dif- ferent from the true amount. One interesting feature of Lindet’s work was the storage in the dark of a portion of the samples analyzed at each picking. The temperature at which the apples were stored is not given. Lindet did not appear to observe the more rapid ripening of the immature fruit, and that fact was not apparent in the table of composition which he published. The graphic representation here STORAGE, RESPIRATION, AND GROWTH. 65 given, constructed from his figures, makes itevident. This article was found subsequent to the completion of the writers’ work on the same subject, but it is confirmed by the latter in all respects. As indicated by the results of Lindet and those obtained by the writers (as given in figures 13 to 16), the green apples ordinarily mature much more rapidly when stored than when left on the tree. It is also equally true that the apples which were picked earliest matured more rapidly than those picked at a later date, and the invert sugar content of the earliest picked apples reached a higher figure after picking than that of those picked at a later time. ** Maturing” in this connection is regarded from a chemical point of view only, especially with regard to the decrease of malic acid and starch, and the increase of sucrose and invert sugar. Germination tests, conducted at 20° C. on the seeds of all samples of the six varieties of growing apples studied in 1903, were made by the seed laboratory of the Bureau of Plant Industry, Department of Agri- culture, under the direction of Dr. J. W. T. Duvel. In all cases nega- tive results were obtained, except in two instances—Huntsman (serial No. 7286), in which case a germination of 2 per cent was noted, and Winter Paradise (serial No. 7260), which gave 6 per cent. METHODS OF ANALYSIS. PREPARATION OF SAMPLE. The sample was quartered, cores removed, twice passed through a meat grinder, and received in a fruit jar (provided with a cover) from which the various portions were weighed out. The methods of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists were followed in general, but on account of various changes introduced as the work progressed, they are given here in detail. DETERMINATION OF TOTAL SOLIDS. A sample of about 10 grams was weighed into a tared flat-bottomed lead dish, stirred with a little water, and evaporated to nearly constant weight in a vacuum oven at a temperature not higher than 70° C., and in a vacuum of 16 to 20 inches. DETERMINATION OF TOTAL ACID. Samples weighing 10 or 20 grams were weighed in a counterpoised sugar dish, and washed into a beaker of about 400 ce capacity with about 300 cc of water, brought to a boil, cooled somewhat (while the beaker remained covered with a watch glass), titrated with tenth normal sodium hydroxid, using phenolphthalein as indicator, and the result expressed as malic acid. DETERMINATION OF SUGARS. Five times the normal weight for the Schmidt and Haensch polariscope, 130.24 grams, was weighed in a counterpoised sugar dish, washed into a 500-ce flask, and 25 ce of basic lead acetate” was added, the mixture made nearly up to the mark, « Prepared according to the directions given in Bul. 65, p. 84, Bureau of Chemistry, U.S. Dept. of Agr. 27981—Bul. 94—05——5 66 STUDIES ON APPLES. shaken, and allowed to stand over night. The solution was then filtered, the lead nearly all removed by dry sodium sulphate, followed by dry sodium carbonate, the solution again filtered, and the filtrate used in the determination of sugars by polar- imetric and gravimetric methods. The Clerget method was used for the polari- metric work, calculating by the formula as modified by Tolman, ?¢ viz: a=) - = = T 141.85-+ .062b—> Soxhlet’s method was used in the determination of reducing sugar as invert before and after inversion. The tables of Meissl and Wein were used, and the cuprous oxid was filtered off on Gooch crucibles and weighed as such, as described by Munson. ? DETERMINATION OF STARCH. Fifty grams of pulp were weighed into a clean cloth bag, the mouth of the bag closed with a rubber band, and the contents squeezed with the hand or lemon squeezer, and then washed with portions of about 25 ce of water until the washings amounted to about 250 ec. The last washings were in all cases neutral to litmus and free from reducing sugar. The starch was settled from the washings by means of a centrifugal machine, repeatedly washed by stirring with fresh portions of water and settling, and transferred to a 300-cc flask, roughly graduated at 200 cc. The mare from the cloth bag, separated as completely as possible by scraping with a spatula, was washed into the flask, and the whole made up to 200 cc. Twenty cubic centimeters of approximately 25 per cent hydrochloric acid (sp. gr. 1.125) was added, and the whole heated for three hours in, not on, the steam bath under an air con- denser. The mixture was then cooled, almost neutralized by sodium hydroxid, cooled again, made up to 300 cc, filtered, and 25 ce portions employed for the determination of dextrose by Allihn’s method. ¢ DISCUSSION OF METHOD FOR STARCH. Determinations by the above method are all 0.5 to 0.8 per cent too high, owing to bodies not starch which remain in the mare and become partially hydrolyzed to reducing bodies by the acid treatment. The supernatant liquors from the centrifugal machine always give a test for starch, but the quantity of starch present is very minute. Satisfactory results could not be obtained by the diastase method, because it was impossible to break all the cells. The diastase did not have ready access to the swollen starch grains, and the complete washing out of dextrin was not possible. The direct extraction of the sugars by alcohol was tried, but was found less convenient than the water extraction. Other methods for the determination of starch in fruits have been deseribed, among which the methods of Browne and Lindet are given as worthy of special consideration. “ Bul. 73, p. 70, Bureau of Chemistry, U.S. Dept. of Agr. b Ibid, p. 65. ¢ Bul. 65, p. 49, Bureau of Chemistry, U.S. Dept. of Agr. @ [bid, p. 58. 0 INSOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES OR MARC. 67 C. A. Browne, jr.,¢ determined starch by the following method: One hundred grams of finely grated pulp were washed upon a muslin filter with repeated quantities of cold water until the filtrate amounted to two liters, the muslin being squeezed after each addition of water. The washed out starch was allowed to settle, the supernatant liquid poured off, and the starch collected on a hardened filter and washed with water. The starch was determined by the official diastase method with the exception that sodium hydroxid instead of sodium carbonate was used for neutralization after the hydrolysis with hydrochloric acid. The residue on the filter was also run by the diastase method, in case it showed any reaction with iodin. Not more than 0.1 to 0.2 per cent of starch, calculated on the original bulk, was ever found in this residue. Lindet? used the following procedure, depending on the solvent action of salicylic acid on starch: One hundred grains of pulp were placed on a filter and washed with 5 to 6 liters of water, to which a little mustard oil was added to prevent fermentation. The filter and contents were introduced into a flask with 250 cc of water, 2 grams of salicylic acid, and 100 grams of salt, and boiled for three hours under a return condenser. The volume of the resulting solution was meas- ured and the solution polarized, corrections being made for the volume of solid constituents. The percentage of starch was calculated from the rotation observed, the rotatory power of the dextrin being taken as (@)p=+177. The method was checked by hydrolyzing the dextrin obtained to dextrose and determining the latter by means of Fehling’s solution. II. INSOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES OR MARC. PECTIN BODIES. HistoricaAL REvIEw. Good reviews of the literature and descriptions of pectins have been made by von Lipmann,’ Tollens,? Hebert,’ and by Mangin,/ the latter having taken up the work from the botanist’s point of view. In order to bring the subject before American investigators the present review is presented. The pioneer work in the field was done by Braconnot,’ who found pectins very widely distributed in plants, occurring in the dahlia, in Jerusalem ‘artichokes, celery, carrots, onions, in stems and leaves of «J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1901, 23: 869. b Ann. agron., 1894, 20: 5. ¢ Chemie der Zuckerarten, 1895, p. 924-936. @ Handbuch der Kohlenhydrate, 1888 ed., p. 242-246, 1895 ed., p. 242-247. é Ann. agron., 1900, 26: 34-50. J J. bot., 1891, 5: 400, 440; 1892, 6: 12. g Ann. chim. phys., 1825 [2], 28: 173. 68 STUDIES ON APPLES. herbaceous plants, in the cortical layers of trees, and in fruits. So con- stant was its occurrence in his researches that this author regarded it as one of the principal constituents of all plants. He considered it to be similar, if not entirely identical, with the principle in plants vaguely described as jelly. The method given by Braconnot for obtaining pectin (as pectic acid) from roots containing starch is to pulp the roots, wash out with water to remove sugar, then boil the mare with dilute hydrochloric acid, wash, and heat the starch-free and sugar-free mare with very dilute potash or soda. There results a mucilaginous slightly alkaline liquid, from which hydrochloric acid separates pectic acid as a jelly. So prepared, pectic acid had a feebly acid reaction to litmus and was slightly soluble in hot water, but the filtered liquor did not precipitate on cooling, and barely reddened litmus. It was, however, coagulated by alcohol, by metallic salts, and even by sugar. Dried on a capsule it appeared as transparent leaflets which loosened from the capsule as they dried. These were slightly swelled by cold water, and dissolved slightly in boiling water. = + 186° to 300°) and to form easily soluble, alkali salts dialysing readily, while the other salts are insoluble and gelatinous. He sepa- ‘ated up to 80 per cent of mucie acid, but noted that pectic acid from different sources and prepared by different methods behaved very differently in regard to yield of mucic acid; some giving the above high percentage, while others gave very little, and still others no mucic acid whatever. Those yielding high percentages of mucic acid showed the highest rotatory power (up to [@],=+300°), and on hydrolysis passed over principally into galactose, while those showing low percentages of mucic acid gave exclusively or almost exclusively arabinose. Such characteristics are indicated by the author in case of pectin from beet mare. Sugar-free beet mare was allowed to stand several days with 1 per cent of hydrochloric acid, then pressed out, and the filtrate concen- “7Zts. Ver. d. Zucker-Ind., 1891, 41: 295, 667. Compt. rend., 1894, 119: 1012; 1895, 120: 110; 1895, 121: 726. eOsterr.-Ung. Zts. Zucker-Ind. Landw. 21: 546; 23: 268, through Chemie der Zuckerarten, yon Lippman, 1895, p. 927, 928. 76 STUDIES ON APPLES. trated at the lowest possible temperature. Alcohol was added and resulting gelatinous precipitate after filtering off was dissolved in water. After digesting for one hour with 1 per cent hydrochloric acid at 60° C., and filtering, two precipitates were formed on fractional precipitation of the filtrate with alcohol. The first, after repeated solution and precipitation with water and alcohol respectively, was a white weakly acid mass, precipitated by barium chlorid and lead ace- tate, of strongly dextro-rotatory power ([@]p=-+ 167.4°), and yielding 20 per cent of mucic acid on oxidation. The second, after purifica- tion in the same way, was an amorphous white substance, precipitated by lead acetate, but not by barium chlorid, showing less dextro- rotation ([@]p»>=+ 123.8°), and gave no muciec acid on oxidation, but yielded with phloroglucin and hydrochloric acid an intense color reaction denoting pentoses or pentosans. Tromp de Haas and Tollens“” gave the ultimate composition and products of hydrolysis by sulphuric acid of pectins from many sources. Their results showed that the relation of hydrogen and oxygen in these bodies was nearly 1 to 8, as required by the carbohy- drate formula, and that the pectin bodies which they-studied contained no complex which gave rise to dextrose, but that complexes were pres- ent which yielded pentose sugars and galactose on hydrolyzing with acids. Tollens’ in a later paper says that pectin bodies may probably be regarded as glucosides, since the acid reaction, combination with bases, and slightly higher oxygen-hydrogen ratio of extracted pectins indi- cate the presence of carboxyl groups. The pectin in the plant may not have acid properties, but may exist as a lactone. Andrlik® discusses the action of dilute hydrochloric acid in the cold on beet mare. A pectin of specific rotatory power ([@]p=+214.4° to 220) was extracted, and purified by repeated precipitation with alco- hol. The longer the acid acted on the beet marc, the more insoluble in water was the pectin dissolved. Bourquellot and Hérissey,/ and later Bourquellot’ alone, studied the extraction of pectins with hot water, and the effect of two enzyms on the dissolved bodies. A 1 per cent solution of pectins from gentian root was gelatinized by a solution of pectase within 40 minutes, and also by limewater, sodium hydroxid followed by hydrochloric acid, neutral and basic lead acetates, ferric chlorid, magnesium sulphate, and ammonium sulphates, but not by sodium sulphate. The pectin was not reducing and was dextro-rotatory ([@]p>=+82.3°). Acidified water extracted a more dextro-rotatory body ([a@],)=+145.3' “#Ann. Chem. (Liebig), 1895, 286: 278. bIbid., 1895, 286: 292. ¢Zts. Gacker-Ind. Bohm., 1894, 19: 101, throngh Chem. Centrbl. 1895, 66: 1, 833. a@J, pharm. chim., 1898, [6] 7: 473; 1898, [6] 8: 145; 1899, [6] 9: 281. ‘Compt. rend., 1899, 128: 1241. INSOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES OR MARC. ae They found that the soluble ferments produced by Aspergillus niger partially hydrolyzed the pectose of gentian root, converting it into pectin. Pectin was hydrolyzed (rendered noncoagulable) by diastase from malt, but not by saliva or by emulsin. The pectin was said to yield mucic acid and arabinose like that from beet mare. Bourquellot defined pectins as substances which dissolve in water, yield mucic acid, and are coagulated by limewater, baryta water, and by pectase. The solutions were optically active, contrary to the results of Frémy ({a@]p= 82.3° to 194°). The ferment in malt which dissolves pectin he called pectinase.. Pectase and pectinase, added together to a pectin solution, ‘aused coagulation, then solution, similar to the effects of rennet and trypsin on casein. Javillier,“ using the methods of Bourquellot and Hérissey, obtained corroborating results with quince pectin. It was strongly dextro- rotatory ([a@],=188.2°), gave arabinose and mucic acid, and behaved toward malt diastase like the pectins obtained by Bourquellot. Votocék' and Sebor? obtained from beets, by the treatment with alkali, an arabic acid which they determined to be not a homogeneous compound, since different preparations showed varying rotatory pow- ers. Other evidence that the arabic acid was a mixture of similar substances was that varying quantities of arabinose and galactose were formed on hydrolysis of different preparations, and by hydrolyzing the acetylation product the original acid was not regained, but the products possessed different rotatory powers and contained different proportions of the groups which give rise to arabinose and galactose. A very pure glucosazone was obtained from the hydrolysis product of the arabic acid, so that three complexes may be present tan, and glucose. Bauer“ obtained various sugars from pectins from different sources— galactose from pear pectin, xylose from apple pectin, and other sugars not positively identified from orange peel. Widtsoe and Tollens” reported arabinose, xylose, and fucose in gum tragacanth, which Girard’ had found to be 60 per cent pectin. Cross’ considers that pectin may be ligno-cellulose free from incrusting materials, and suggests that it would be well to try the methods used for separating cellulose bodies on the pectins. araban, galac- @J. pharm. chim., 1899, [6] 9:163 and 513. b Zts. Zucker-Ind. Bohm., 1899, 24: through Chem. Centrbl., 1899, [2] 70: 1022, through J. Chem. Soc., 1900, 78:1, 208. ¢J. prak. Chem., 1891, [2] 48: 112; Landw. Versuchs-Stat., 1892, 41: 477; 1894, 43: 191; Verh. Vers. Deutsch, Ntf. u. Arzte, 1900, II, 1, Halfte, 99, Aachen, through Chem. Centrbl., 1901, [2], 72: 196. d Ber. d. chem. Ges., 1900, 33: 132. eIbid., 1875, 8: 340. J Ibid.. 1895, 28: 2609. 78 STUDIES ON APPLES. Mangin“” contributed a comprehensive review, referred to at the beginning of this paper, and studies which appear to be worth cor- roborating at least by the microchemist, and if proved to be reliable, they may be used in connection with chemical investigation. Mangin considers that pectic compounds are constant constituents of cell membranes; that pectose itself may be a mixture of several similar compounds or a single body; that pectose seems to be elaborated earlier than cellulose in young tissue, and forms the intermedullary layer in mature tissue; that it is not elaborated from cellulose; and that soft parenchymatous tissue is essentially characterized by a very close association of cellulose and of pectins. | Many coloring agents are stated to dye the pectins in plant tissues and differentiate them from cellulose but not from nitrogenous matters nor from lignin, suberin, or cutin, so that the number of suitable dyes issmall. These dyes are the safranines, methylene blue, ** bleu de nuit,” and naphthalene blue R in crystals. Safranine is said to color the nitrogenous bodies and lignin a cerise red, while the pectins are colored a yellow orange. Methylene and ‘‘bleu de nuit” color nitrogenous bodies and lignin a beautiful blue, while the pectins are colored a violet blue best seen by lamplight. A mixture of naphthalene blue R- in crystals and acid green J. E. E. E. (poirier) (equal parts of a 1 per cent solution of each) colors pectins violet and other bodies green. Ruthenium red is also recommended. The above review does not nearly do justice to Mangin’s contribu- tions. Since the methods used are distinctly microchemical, however, a more extended notice does not seem necessary in this connection. Much of the material found in Mangin’s review is also found in an article by Reynolds Green,’ who discusses the pectin bodies from the botanist’s point of view. Most of the facts brought out in the above review are tabulated, for convenience of reference, in Table VII (see p. 80). “Compt. rend. 1888, 107: 144; 1889, 109: 579; 1890, 110: 295; 1893, 116: 653; J. bot. 1891, 5: 400-440; 1892, 6: 12, 206, 235, 363; 1898, 7: 37, 121, 325. Science Progress, 1896, 6: 344. i 80 STUDIES ON APPLES. TABLE a | - | | | Page in Name. Author. Date. this Source. | | re- view. ReChinee=s sane: Braconnot...-.-.-- 1825 67 | A very wide range of plant tissues. | DOrsae.. ese Vauquelin ..--..- 1829 68 | (a) From carrot juice and (b) from the mare of earrot. DoRex = hse IN HUY KG Kes ee = eee 1838 697) Sicha eee eee | Doses as ia gee aA oa 1840) 69 |, Fruit juices\/--- = 5-25 - DORs a Chodnewes----- 1844 70 | Pears, apples ........- WO stoctes Poumarede and | 1846 691 a 2 ce ee eee are een Figuier. Dos ssnerse. lnysh Aegean 1847 72 | Fruit maresand fruit juices. DO. tee | Studev< csc eee 1864 TS NGS Le coe a See remnes Dors-se | Giverdy once ee 1875 | 73 | Gum tragacanth....-. DORs cee Scheibler......... 1879 fd) || BECUINATC 2 eeeeseeeee Doves. ...- Weisberg: ........- 188831) 74s eee GO o28 eer ee | Divas: Wohl and Van | 1888| 74 |..... do. 2 ees | | Niessen, | | | 1) fo ee | Herzfeld. ......... sv. | 75} Beet mare and or- | anges. Made VIL.— Tabular résumé of Preparation. The mare of the tissues is extracted with hot dilute alkali after exhaustion with dilute hydroehlorie acid. The product is pre- cipitated by acidifying the solution. (a) By precipitating with alcohol; (6) by extract- ing with dilute alkaliand acidifying. The juice is clarified by boiling, then precipitated by alcohol. The product is then purified by repeat- ed solution in water and precipiation with alco- ol. The crushed fruit is boiled with water, the product filtered, and the filtrate precipitated with alcohol. From mares by boiling with solutions of organic acids; from juices by precipi- tating with alcohol. soluble by boiling with water. From beet mare by heating with water; from oranges |. by precipitating the clear juice with alcohol. INSOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES the literature of the pectin bodies. OR MARC, 81 Properties. : | . Remarks. Solvents. | Precipitants. poe | As Renee Other properties. é Alkaline | Metallic salts; |.......-.-.-.- geet em Ser sane Mucie and oxalic | The product obtain- solutions. aleohol;: acid formed on ed by Braconnot is sugar. oxidation with probably the pee- nitric acid. tic acid of later workers. (GawWaiter sec) PAU cools | sae ye Si os (eames cra slayvalaall se terte wimialesatojars aoe The product from (b) al- () acids. the juice (4) was kali so- probably the pec- lutions. tin and that from the mare (6) the pectic acid of later workers, 6 ee Aye RSS aE ee tee ere pee el pean hae ape ee Combustion figures | Peetie acid was given for pectin believed to differ and pectic acid. from pectin only in its higher ash content. WIGNER ie ee a a Does not yield | Alkali hydrolysis | The existence of a sugar; meta- yielded the salt of mother substance pectic acid metapectic acid. in the cell walls formed. Combustion fig- | of fruits, which ures of lead salt | slowly passes into given. Boiling pectin as the fruits with water in- ripen, issuggested. creased the amount of lead which would combine with the pectin. naar GOR lea Glacetatern asses ee ee eae ee ea ees oe | eNeuLralimreaction: basic lead easily powdered. acetate; Combustion — fig- copper sul- ures given. Ap- t phate; lime ple pectin differs water; po- from pear pectin tassium hy- | in not dissolving droxid. in water to form a clear solution. | Pectins disappear as fruits ripen. = 2 pst eth se Selb cca SSE Sood ae Oo Se | OOS Aa reese tea ar ante fener aaa ea | Pectin was consid- ered to be identical | with cellulose. No | other authors agree with these. Walter ses |ATCOhol as = 2 Inactive..| Does not yield | Neutralin reaction, | sugar, but not precipitated gives meta- by lead acetate. pectin and The enzym pec- patapectice tase produces pec- acid. tosic acid. Solu- tions of alkalis change pectin to | pecticacid. Pyro- | pectic acid is pro- | duced on heating | to 200° C. | ool pe Sere DE SIS Se ces REE HSA | Se Bee eres ee Pe Ree as ee ed fc ae ae ah De A discussion only; | no data given. \\! CICS cet | Fe Sea er eee el DN (Se a ee nee A Rene oni eee ae ate peli ae | 200°, | | BR eau do ....| Alcohol; ba- |............| Arabinose ......| On heating the wa- | sic lead ace- | ter solution its | tate. | acidity gradually | __ increased. | 2 oS Reag 2 aE ee ee ee ees do ..........| Mucic acid formed | | from the beet | mare indicating | presence of galac- | Gehan Water ....} Alcohol; lead | From or- |.-..-- Goes eso | INIGIO EVO Bee ea ane Pectin considered to acetate. anges in- be a mixture of active. arabans and galac- tans. 27981— Bul. 94—05——6 STUDIES ON APPLES. . Tapie VII.—Tabular résumé of the . Bertrand and | Tromp de -Haas and Tollens. Bourquellot and Pectic acid .... Pectinie acid.. Page in : Date.} this Source. Preparation, re- view. Td. |e J cl entke es oe sab SSeS sini ee eee ele eee ee 16 | uc sSees aot b= oes 552 Set ee eee ee 16 | .02- sods - 22 e See oaae tee ee eee 76 |"Beet miareseeeo eee Cold dilute” hydrochloric - acid. ~ 76 | Gentian root -.--- _...| Extraction with hot water - 11\- QU CCl oes See eee | eee do.23525) 5:1 Se ee 77.| Pears, apples, OTAD C= |/3)) 5 Se ee a peel. 17 | weceed sale ee ee | ee 18>) - s-02 52. Sse ode one se] eee ee eee 60 |ics- oe eo | 70; Beetimareece-ee eee Boiling with sodium car- bonate. VOSA see GOs Fs Seat Boiling with dilute potassi- um hydroxid, then fil- tering and precipitating ~ with hydrochloric acid. a Pectines. <. osasaeeeee Treatment with alkali...... Old MSc nee tt ee ot | i oe ec em » of TL | Beet mare... -.ceerees Boiling with dilute hydro- | chlorie acid and precipi- | tating with alcohol, | 7) 44 iy i, INSOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES OR literature of the pectin bodies—Continued. MARC. 83 | Properties. . Spe te Polariza- | Results of acid | Solvents. | Precipitants. fans hydrolysis. | | | 2 BS eet Bae cio y nS: al sherallia a = Neuere ae Pentose sugars | and galactose. | | = "Ss roe Mone eae mera Re en ne) Se Water ....| Alcohol ...--. fe. ca) a ess Nahe eee oe | | 214.4°to | | pon BRIS ==. 40 Coagulated [a]pD = + | Arabinose-..- by pectase, | 82.3°and | limewater, | -188.2°. | sodium, hy- c | droxid fol- lowed by hydroc hlo- EVeG 1a C1 a: neutraland basic lead acetate, fer- ric chlorid, magnesium and ammo- | | nium sul- | phate. Se ORCS EOC aero ae [a] D = JSG Oe seer es 188.2°. 2 OER E Fe PES Dc RIN bate [ng Sear oe te Galactose and xylose. ohne pees eee a Sa ee 2 eS ae ae See ie ee } | PAM HEA CIOSOlUtIONS)|--- 52 .22-2-|--2c2 2 s22 7 nce solutions. SAUIEAMIS SE Sth 7 ACIG FSR SS tl aa ea | na ag Alkaline |....- IO pre emia] a Tans | ate ee ee he solutions. Petes era | fal Dp = + |e as sess 186° to | 300°. : | Meera eANCONO] x2. .|.°..--.-..2- ese ine eee ets | Other properties. Remarks. Coagulated by pec- | tase in presence | of salts of alka- line earth metals. Hydrogen to oxy- -genratioisnearly 1 to 8. Combus- | tion figuresgiven. | Author considers that pectin may be regarded as a glucoside. Mucie acid formed. Pectin hydrol- yzed by malt diastase, not by saliva or emul- sin. Mucie acid formed. Hydrolyzed by malt diastase. | Prolonged treat- ment with alkali gave metapectic acid. Noprecipi- tate would form on acidifying. Prolonged boiling in dilute alkali gave a solution from which noth- ing would precip- itate on acidify- ing, metapectic acid having been formed. Forms easily solu- ble alkali salts. Yields up to 80 per cent of mucic acid. Possesses a_ slight acid reaction. Pectins defined as bodies which dis- solve in water, yield mucie acid, coagulated by limewater, baryta water, and by pec- tase, and which are dextro rota- tory. | Discussion only; pec- tins may be ligno- cellulose free from incrusting mate- rials. | Discussion and mi- crosecopical work. Pectin a constant fundamental con- stituent in young tissues. 84 STUDIES ON APPLES. ; a Taste VII.—Tabular résumé of the Name. Uberpectic acid. Pectose Parapectin Metapectin Parapectic acid Pectosic acid ..|.. . Metapecticacid Do Metapecticacid (arabic acid). Pararabin Author. Date Chodnew.-....-.--- 1844 Bremniviess sean 1§47 Bee he COM See ees S| LSAT, Baa ee CO ee 1847 eat CO ee Sas, See Ona ees | 1847 Ghodnewenss- 5. 1844 WR ON faunas 1859 Scheibler......--- 1868 Reichardt ---- == 1875 ~l i Source. Preparation. Beet marGeesese ee Beet marc, after exhausting with dilute hydrochloric acid, was treated with al- Kali. Plant:tisSues>: 22.555 | Se eee Pectin == ee Boiling with water ......... ees do -...-.----------| Boiling with dilute acid -.-- Pace (Oe soses | Prolonged _ boiling with acids. Spe €02352- 5255-52222 -| breatnents.with she owen— zym pectase. Eee GO 223222 -26-25--e| Bollingawith al kel aes Beetimarers sos seere Boiling with milk of lime.. peas do ..-.....-....-.:| Heated with potassium hy- droxid, filtered, acidun- lated, and precipitated with alcohol. | | Carrots scowle alstsceca cs | eee ae See Se eee ee INSOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES OR MARC. 85 literature of the pectin bodies—Continued. Properties. F F Remarks : eke Pol - | Results of acid - ; Solvents. | Precipitants. yes hydrolysis. Other properties. Ee Se te eine A een ee a In ye eens ee | seers Soe eee ame aats Mu. NM RES ATaed as the'sub- ; F stance which gives rise to the pectin bodies. sae h eae 1 TRG TUUUGT RET Reese, Se a pee pees ae | ict a me | LE a eee Be exe ae 2a L@EKG! AEGUIGIES |e as te cececllecoucenacooscescos|| Ile jOSCinha AypnKGl [eee Damrete User parapectin, save — ehlorid. slightly acid. Sa ne Wicanol acids: pee eee a ANSI A TL OLMNC GA Sere! ieee seen |: salts. Been elie hese a eee el Acr a Din Ose lece ces ek SS formed. Bi geet Spates ea at iit |e ok eee Se Verysimilar to Schei- | bler’s arabie acid. 86 STUDIES ON APPLES. COMMENTS ON THE PROBLEMS INVOLVED. From the foregoing review pectin bodies would be defined as sub- stances of undetermined function, very widely distributed in plant tis- sues. Pectin bodies occur both in the juice and mare, i. e., in soluble and insoluble forms. The latter form, according to the work of Scheibler, Wohl, Van Niessen, and others, and from the work done in the Bureau of Chemistry, seems to be resolved into soluble forms by boiling with water. The solutions possess considerable viscosity, the property of forming jellies with precipitants—such as alcohol, sugars, solutions of salts, and pectase—and usually rotate polarized light to the right. The rotating power of the different pectin bodies appears to vary con- siderably. The distinctions laid down by Frémy as existing between the pectin bodies seem to be based on uncertain physical properties “@ and on the amount of lead with which they will combine. Criteria adopted by later workers are based mainly on chemical behavior and action on polarized light. - Chemically, pectin bodies are characterized by yielding reducing sugars, furfurol, and mucic acid in widely varying amounts, according to the source of the pectins and the method employed in isolating them. These variations may be largely due to varying degrees of hydration and to impurities in the pectin bodies examined. Dif- ferences in the pectin bodies themselves, however, are indicated by the results of Ullik and Herzfeld. Pectins are profoundly changed by alkalis with the formation of salts of the so-called pectic acid, the free acid being insoluble in water. Acid groups appear to be formed even by treatment with very dilute alkali fora very short time, so that extraction with alkali of pectins from plants does not recommend itself to the writers when a study of the dissolved material is desired. The most important problem appears to be the quantitative deter- mination of the pectin bodies occurring in a given tissue, because such a method could be used to determine the function of the material in plants—whether, for example, it is a reserve material, a by-product, is used for structural purposes, or has all three functions or two of them; whether the nature of the pectin body changes with the growth or age of the tissue, or possesses a practically constant com- position; whether the pectin bodies obtained from different sources are identical, are mixtures of the same substances (such as araban and galactan) in varying proportions, or are inherently different. It is of interest to note that all pectin bodies thus far studied have been derived from the softer tissues. The harder woody material has not been considered. aj. prak. Chem., 1884, 30: 370. Neue Ztg. Zucker-Ind., 1885, 14: 151. SO PO RE PEE ET in fo Sty tanta ls UY) ( INSOLUBLE CARBOHYDRATES OR MARC. ( if In this connection the following quotation from Cross and Bevan“ is of interest: It appears, therefore, generally, that the pectic group are compounds of carbo- hydrates of varied constitution with acid groups of undetermined constitution, asso- ciated together to form molecular complexes, more or less homogeneous, but entirely resolved by the continued action of simple hydrolytic agencies; and the pectocellu- loses are substances of similar character in which the carbohydrates are in part replaced by nonhydrolyzable celluloses. The general characteristics of the pecto- celluloses are therefore these: they are resolved by boiling with dilute alkaline solu- tions into cellulose (insoluble) and soluble derivatives of the noncellulose (pectin, pectic acid, metapectic acid); they are gelatinized under the alkaline treatment; they are ‘‘saturated compounds,’’ not reacting with the halogens, nor containing any groups immediately. allied to the aromatic series. Later in the same volume, page 221, Cross and Bevan refer to the parenchymatous tissue of fruits, Fesliey roots, etc., as being typical pectocelluloses. , This suggests the possibility that all insoluble pectin bodies occur- ring in the vegetable world are really in combination with cellulose and belong to the group of pectocelluloses. This idea is in part borne out by the results previously published by several writers and con- firmed by the results given on page 88, in which it is seen that iasolu- ble pectin bodies are changed to soluble form by boiling with water. If such insoluble pectin bodies, usually called pectoses, are really pectocelluloses, this action by which they are converted into soluble form Is really a splitting off of the pectin group from the cellulose complex. In this connection should be noted the recent work by Mangin,? in which attention is called to deposits which that writer considered to be caleium pectate between the cell walls of plant tissues. His con- clusions, however, have recently been disputed by Devaux,’ who asserts that this insoluble deposit was not really calcium pectate but true pectose. If it is found that the substance now known as pectose is really a pectocellulose, it is suggested by the writers that the latter term be employed to designate it and that the use of the term pectose, which is a misnomer and altogether misleading, be discontinued. ANALYSES OF APPLE MARC. PREPARATION OF SAMPLE. Fully ripe Rhode island Greening apples were taken from cold storage, wiped off, quartered, cores and bruised places removed, and passed through a meat grinder. The pulp was then exhausted with water by pressing out by hand in cloth bas wel successive jsouenoins a Gomes 2d ed., 1903, p. 217, 6 Loe. cit. (see p. 78). “Mémoires de la société des sciences physiques et naturelles de Bordeaux, 1903 [6 ]2 5-90: S88 STUDIES ON APPLES. of water until the wash water gave no test for reducing sugar. The resulting mare, amounting to 2.745 per cent of the ground fresh pulp, was spread out in shallow pans and placed on a steam radiator, and, after drying, was ground to a fine powder, exhausted with alcohol, and then with ether in a Soxhlet’s extractor. The alcohol removed any sugar remaining in the marc, and the extractions which occur on the skins of apples, namely, apple wax and a white solid, apple vitin.¢ Ether then removed very little from the marc, chiefly green color- ing matter. The ether was evaporated spontaneously and the mare . bottled. RESULTS OF ANALYSIS. Prepared as above, the mare was analyzed, with the following results: Taste VIII.—Analysis of apple mare. Water-free Determinations. |Air-dry basis. Bea b ePerncent: Per cent. WiStCr Grice hwo 2 tinkinwentictie nee ee es RE CES See oe eee eee eee 14.04" | so eee GellwloseGy = 2-3-2856 solo ke bce ee bR Saeko eae oa ns Sa eee eee eee 33. 82 39.33 ES Ea gS Ai ae ee es eee PEPE SRE Se os assoccck se seee cero: 27.68 32. 20 Rentosans @ i505 2022s Seen Ba tk Sea et See a ee ee Perea he) 26.51 Proven @. soso St ce. 3 ee ee ee ee ee | 3. 50 4.07 ASR Son oe ewes s ciinons oak ets be deka ke ae re, eat Rea ea ee | 96 Jt? Soluble in boiling water: f Hirst, HOULS: so. 22 ssa yee See he ee ee ee Se eee ee eee 20. 83 24.23 SECONG*MOUE se. =. ees Beek eae ae ee a ee 8.52 9.91 Dhird Howre Ss .2 2.3 os Melee 2s | Stee eee eee 4. 37 5.08 ROUEEAINOUT oe oc ah oo st ora Se noe ee ee 2.67 3.10 Bifthshour 2.222252 Se ee as eS ee ee Boa) 2.94 SEXUH HOUT 25.25 22S oe Sao eS Se ee ny Ti ee ap 1. 92 2.23 Total. 2.2.55 24 5. coe eet Se: Oe eee 40. 84 47.49 Soluble in 1 per cent sodium hydroxid by Gifferenceg .................-.- 62. 94 56. 80 Residue from boiling-water treatmenth -_...... 2.22. .2 222 eee eee 46. 60 54. 22 Residue from 1 per cent sodium-hydroxid treatment @...............-.--- 37. 06 43. 20 a Dried at 100° to constant weight. b Method of Cross and Bevan, ‘‘ Cellulose,”’ p. 95. ¢ No starch was present, but the mare hydrolyzed by hydrochlorie acid, as in the method for starch (see p. 66), gave the above percentage of reducing sugar calculated as starch. @ Bul. 65, Bureau of Chemistry, U. 8. Dept. of Agr., p. 173; Cir. 7, Bureau of Chemistry, U.S. Dept. Agr., revised edition, p. 1. eN x 6.25. J Twenty grams of mare were boiled with 400 ce of water under a return condenser for successive periods of 1 hour each; the product was filtered after each boiling through a cloth bag, the residue washed and returned to flask, and the filtrate evaporated and weighed. 9 The actual amount dissolyed may be somewhat higher than is indicated here, owing to hydration (see footnote ‘‘h).”’ AIt will be noted that the sum of the residue and material extracted by boiling water is greater than 100 per cent (101.71 per cent dry basis), probably indicating hydration of one or both of the products. ‘ Five grams of the air-dry mare were boiled with 200 ce of 1 per cent sodium hydroxid for one-half hour, this being the first treatment described for the determination of cellulose by the chlorination method deseribed by Cross and Bevan. It will be noted that 11.02 per cent (dry basis) is soluble in sodium hydroxid, and not dissolved by the hot-water treatment. But it is probable that longer treatment with boiling water would have removed larger amounts. It seems impossible to make sharp separations. It will also be noted that the lignin (removed by chlorin and sodium sul- “Seifert, Landw. Versuchs. Stat., 1894, 45:29. EXAMINATIONS OF APPLE STARCH. 89 phite treatments in method for cellulose) amounts to but 3.87 per cent of the dry marc.@ The pectin removed during the first hour of boiling was soluble in water. It yielded 46.58 per cent of pentosan and 54.6 per cent ‘‘ starch” (°) and showed a rotatory power of [@|p =71.2° to 78.7°; i. e., a 1.851 per cent solution polarized at 3.8° to 4.2° in a Schmidt and Haensch polariscope in a 10-cm tube. The pectin removed during the second. hour gave 41.46 per cent of pentosan and 30.02 per cent ‘* starch.” It was impossible to get a solution clear enough to polarize. No mucic acid determinations were made. Whether pectin in apple marc is a series of bodies of similar consti- tution but of different degrees of hydration, or whether it is a mixture of bodies of different kinds, was not determined. This could be found out by examining, by the criteria of yields of reducing sugar on hydro- lysis with acid, pentosans, and mucic acid, the portions obtained by fractional extraction with boiling water from the tissue and by a simi- lar examination of the products resulting from fractional precipitation of the water extract with alcohol. It is hoped that such studies may be made. III. MICROSCOPIC AND MACROSCOPIC EXAMINATIONS OF APPLE STARCH. MICROSCOPIC STUDIES. S1zE oF STARCH GRAINS. The presence of starch in apples is in itself no new consideration. Buignet® in his work upon the apple failed to find starch present, although the filtered juice from green fruit was colored blue with iodin, which phenomenon was accredited to the presence of tannin. Accord- ing to Lindet,” the earliest mention of starch in apples was made by Grignon’ in 1887. Lindet himself describes the general features con- cerning the disappearance of the starch, and gives as the size of the erains 6 to 20 microns. An examination of the starch as it normally occurs in the tissues will show that the grains are generally compounded, being composed of from 2 to 5 simple grains. In preparing samples of apple starch, the grating of the flesh usually results in tearing these compound grains apart, so that grains having a truncated form very greatly pre- dominate, as is shown in Plate I. “That is, 43.20 per cent was insoluble in 1 per cent sodium bydroxid and 39.33 per cent of cellulose was obtained, so that 3.87 per cent was removed by the treat- ments with chlorin and sodium sulphite. bSee footnote—c, page 88. ¢J. phar. chim., 1859, (3) 36: 81-111. @ Ann. agron., 1894, 20: 5-20. ¢Le Cidre Doin. 90 STUDIES ON APPLES. The individual grains are small and vary in size from 1 to 16 microns, though generally they are between 4and 10 microns. Browne“ found the average size of the grains to be about 9 microns, but the measure- ments made in the Bureau of Chemistry show that the average varies widely, according to the condition of maturity of the fruit. In Table IX are given the results of measurements of grains from several varieties. An examination of these results will show that, generally speaking, the starch grains from within the core line are smaller than those from the torus flesh. In only three specimens, out of the 47 which were examined with this point in mind, did the reverse condition occur. It is true, however, that in nearly ripe apples the figures might give a slightly erroneous idea, inasmuch as there does not appear to be so much decrease in the average size of the grains as might be expected. In this connection, however, it must be remembered that the number of starch grains has decreased very much, and the great majority of those which figured in earlier measurements have disappeared, leaving only a few stray grains behind. The smallest-sized grains which the writer has been able to identify and measure are those slightly less than 1 micron in diameter. The writer has also occasionally found what seemed to be stray starch grains remaining in apparently normal cells of apples which appeared fully ripe. Such grains are rare, however, and the cause for their persistence is not at all clear, though it is pos- sible that it is due to a condition within the cells themselves, resulting in a vitality too low to carry on the ordinary metabolic change. All the specimens of each variety were taken from the same orchard so that the variations arising from differences in climate and soil have been eliminated. TaBLeE IX.—Starch-grain dimensions. PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS (GROWING FRUIT). =A Ar. date oF i. : : = - es See Serial Date of | give of grains in torus Size of grains within — ' Variety. examina- P . - aS b . . > No. rari flesh. core line.} 1902. Microns. Microns. eet = York Imperial. .25 225 eC EE oe el ee ee 7. 3 (2.8 tO. 2) 6.0 (2.4 to 11.2) sackoee GTIMES ose = ask Sack Sore ee ee ee Ores 10. 2 (6.0 to 16.0) 6.0 (2.4 to 11. 23% areas | be Ey Aer > COMMON-STORAGE APPLES. 4 1120 | Rhode Island Greening: - AS pee ut eS ee ened 5.5 (3.2 to 8.8) 2.9(1.6to 6.4) Bie sm = FSET aoe se mel hee don. 6.0 (2.4 to 9.6) 4.2(1.6to 8.0) ES is te My Se eae CPR SS | ae do 4.9(1.6to 9.6) 4.2(1.6to 8.0)7 LD SR Se AL Se eee. eee t sf ee do 4.2(1.6to 9.6) | 3.1(0.8to 6.4% A VONR OG. oe 0G oe ao 8 i Sh ee 5.1(1.6to 9.6) 3.6(0.8 to 8. 0) a Pa. Dept. of Agr., bulletin 5s. - 6The mean diameter of the starch grains in each specimen is given, followed by the minimum and — maximum diameters in parenthesis; then the average of the mean diameters for all specimens exam-_ ined on the same date is given, followed by the lowest and highest diameters found in the group. Se ree a siete EXAMINATIONS OF APPLE STARCH. Taste 1X.—Starch-grain dimensions—Continued. COMMON-STORAGE APPLES—Continued. 91 KS YSN —r——— —S—SEO SS : Date of | a; eet d : Neiee Serial Sy Gn -amina.| 5ize Of grains in torus | Size of grains within No Variety. gunna flesh. oe ees 1127 | Rhode Island Greening: Microns. Microns. | 1 Naa TE Pe ae RES eee i arelooa he See acca Oct. 7 4.7(2.4to 8.0) 3.8(1.6 to 7.2) Bee on re ey eee ayes 200 4.6(1.6to 8.0) 3.7(1.6 to 8.0) AOS Ree he eee Sane Ce kc ea eae ..do 5.7(1.6 to 9.6) 4.4(0.8 to 8.0) | NCTA Orso ee See eee ree aciens siaicie |Weisie aie aes 5.0 (1.6 to 9.6) 3.9 (0.8 to -8.0) 1121 | Agree Spy: 1s NU Sa ee ee ha a moe Sept. 17 7.0 (2.4 to 14. 4) 4.0(1.6 to 7.2 | = IN A ets Ae i ee Oe Ree et an ..do 6.7 (2.4 to 138.6) 4,2(1.6to 7.2 | Ss erly le 5 eco aga a eee ..do 9.5 (1.6 to 12.0) 3.7(1.6 to 5.6 | 1D) ona banter ae aCe en ee ree nei ..do 8.1 (4.0 to 13. 6) 4.8 (1.6 to 8.8 | IAW CLAD Cie areata te ote tyne a erasure [imme ee erciee 7.8 (1.6 to 14, 4) 4.2(1.6to 8.8 - 1128 | Northern Spy: YN EBs aes Sips en A Ne Ba Oct. 7 5.3 (2.4 to 9.6) 3.7(1.6 to 9.6 SB er ees ieee A rear hao areata do 5.5 (1.6 to 11. 2) 4.2 (1.6 to 11.2 Cee a neers ce wie Satis wise --do 6.4 (1.6 to 9.6) 4.7 (2.4 to 11.2 AWERNGO asad occosdgadsconesSuea|loouscosade 5. 7 (1.6 to 11. 2) 4,2(1.5 to 11.2 1154 | Northern Spy+ SI NSE 5 ARE: ake oie ae Re RGN a Oa Nov. 8 5.1 (2.6 to 10.5) 5x4" (35d toON e749 1D See OScons Ge cca ane ee AR ae HO) 5.2 (1.7 to 8.8) 5.3 (2.6 to 9.6 i AY erage BE Bre COREE Reacts GDS neCeror 5.1 (1.7 to 10.5) 5.3(2.6 to 9.6 1122 | Ben Davis: Te Seta fe Nai 5 rier age ee eS Sept. 19 9.2 (3.2 to 15. 2) 5.3 (1.6 to 12.8 Bi eee pa ares apron ee --do. 9.0 (3.2 to 16.8) 3.9(1.6to 9.6 apa eee eet kar ee Cae oe a (0K) q 8.6 (4.0 to 13.6) 5.9 (2.4 to 10.4 INGLES es 3 eo Ba Sige el CCIE 8.9 (3.2 to 16.8) 4.8 (1.6 to 12.8 1145 | Ben Davis: | Nee Peet eg ate Sa aN os fa RD Oct. 23 3.6 (0.8 to 8.0) No starch present. 133 UoresGed ose CaSe eS Sea eee Oo 4.6 (1.6 to 8.0) No starch present. IAS VCMT A Crete Sees Rete Ses, ie, atae | wie weraiste Soe 4.1(0.8to 8.0) ld Gal SBemeD avis ates sae ee eae sre een Oct. 23 No starch present. No starch present. ftase Bem Daryi sete ese ee Nov. -7 3.5(0.8 to 5.3) 3.1(0.8 to 6.0) HMG4S IB Enel aS eee soe eee a Noy. 18 No starch present. No starch present. 1123 | Winesap: | ope aetiologies eee Sept. 19 9.5 (4.8 to 12.8) 5.6 (2.4 to 14. 4) TBS ie ee cae cae Se ana a ofr .-do 9.6 (4.0 to 14.4) 8.8 (5.6 to 18.6) Caer ee es ee earn aes wae o ..do 0.0 (2.4 to 16. 0) 5. 4 (2.4 to 11. 2) LTO RO ACES Ae asec 6 ee eee |e ame 9.7 (2.4 to 16.0) 6.6 (2:4 to 14. 4) 1126 | Winesap: | ON ps ot SERS IEE eT ea Oct 7 7.3 (4.0 to 11.0) 4:8(1.6 to 8.0) | 13) oon oa Se tyne ohne do 7.1 (2.4 to 12.0) 4.9(1.6 to 9.6) (Os dose He Boos one De See Been aaee ee .-do 6.9 (2.4 to 12,0) 3.0(1.6to 8.0) IMCS Soin a aRe ARO Oe OE ns aeons 7.1 (2.4 to 12.0) 4.2 (1.6 to 9.6) 1144. Winesap: IRS Sai see UAE Teg tat ae Re Oct.. 23 5.8 (2.4 to 8.0) No starch present. 1B) e258 JE ee Se eee ee ...do 5.9 (2.4 to 9.6) No starch present. IN WETS Osis a Sea ae Sone ae ees eat Deemer 5.8 (2.4 to 9.6) 1156 | Winesap: | PAW eee mre Oe mid de A A ls Nov. 8 7.2 (1.7 to 15. 8) 6.4 (2.6 to 11.4) | 5s stele se i 2 A lee ee eal ais) ere do 5.5 (0.8 to 11. 4) 7.0 (3.5 to 11.4) | IN GORASE SS Soe Se ee ee [eee 6.3 (0.8 to 15.8) 6.7 (2.6 to 11.4) 1165 | VN Ta PERSE ga See Oe le an ee Noy. 18 starch present No starch present. COLD-STORAGE APPLES. 1142 | Winesap: Wal Mise Pe AS AN a Sy ee Se Oats 23 5.9 (3.0 to 12.0) No starch present. lene Li eae ile ee ee ee edo 6.0 (2.4 to 11.0) No starch present. INSET ERO ee ae Oo og TCR | (eee 5.9 (2.4 to 12.0) No starch present. 1143 | Winesap: 4 Ja SS Seis ith ae ace oe OE Oct. 23 5.6 (1.6 to 9.6) No starch present. 1B Se Smee CoS Sa Cane eer ts P| (ee eS 5.7 (2.4 to 11.0) No starch present. (WOM SE cas Gea as cts aoast epee oecllesteesseer 5.6 (1.6 to 11.0) 1147 Ben Davis: 0 ; IN ESSE poh BOR See ER ae see emer ees Oct. 23 4-3 (1.7 to 8.0) No starch present. Ra ta eet eM Se Nn eo eats ota Edo 3.8 (1.7 to 7.0) No starch present. Pee tS 8 Loreto ee yet tse ere Sees Se do. 4.9 (1.7 to 10.0) No starch present. 1D) SBE0 oe BoE SE ae eee ener do. 5.0 (1.7 to 8.8) No starch present. PEL AR CM eee cea) Ase Sec sta ieee meee 4.5 (1.7 to 10.0) No starch present. 1148 | Ben Davis: « RU ee eet riic Sn cine ns ae Scsee seas Oct. 23 6.3 (1.7 to 10.5) No starch present. 1b 2a Gat Re Oe eee tae .-do 4.8 (1.7 to 9.6) No starch present. ORE er see teed ears oats So Selec ..do 5.3 (1. 7 to 10: 5) No starch present. TD) soe oie On RO ee in eA ve Semen ..do 6.0 (2.6 to 8.8) No starch present. AST CLV YO? Bs Sts AAS A | do 6.6) (1. 7 to 10:5) No starch present. a Picked September 15. 6 Picked August 15. <© bo STUDIES ON APPLES. WEAKENING OF CELL WALLS AND INCREASE OF INTERCELLULAR AIR. During the fall of 1901, in the course of the examination of certain varieties, the intercellular air in the flesh of the fruit seemed to increase constantly. This led to the making of some determinations of the specific gravity of apples at different periods. The only tests, however, which were made during the first season’s work, were carried out in December. The next summer and autumn a number of esti- mations were made at different stages in the growth and maturity of the fruit, the results showing that the specific gravity diminishes to the extent of 2 to 5 per cent. The results given, however, are the average specific gravities of from two to four specimens, and toward the latter part of the experiment it became apparent that the results would have possessed more value if a larger number of specimens had been used. In determining this factor the entire apple was used, and hence is not to be considered as representing the exact specific gravity of the flesh, though comparisons made for the purpose of this work showed that the results were only shghtly below that of the flesh when taken alone. The results of this work are tabulated in Table X. TABLE X.—WSpecific gravity of whole fruit. L yO : Serial : Se ey ra Date of Specifie mee Variety. analysis. gravity. 23667 | Baldwin FE te aah Se a Te te ee os Os Hat ouoas Dec. 10,1901 0. 823 536704|' Tonathan 2s. . 2. 2UtUs ole os Pec a ee ee eee ee | ene doe ckewcs 799 290221A\ York Tmperial)/: Cats Susteis. soci on eine ne ere eee ee July 22, 1902 938 D5219 NW MGriNIes (2b a NE a tes REE Sh sy ee |e GOES G Se 8506 23069 4 NOrth ern: Sp yrs 8 ee eee cae cee cee See eeiceee See Ee eee eee eee eas Dee. 10,1901 802 23668") Rhode Island: Gmreempip a. 32 0 a. ee cases te eee oe ee ae ee ees dossces 823 23658"|) ROMND VISES ee ee eS eae RN DO Vg plats at Ry ea done 753 QOZLSn eee ne (6 Ka yee ee Ie a eerste OS Na ee ee aN ee od oe July 22,1902 . 823 LT26" | WWAMOSAID icin hohe OSE SA See Scare re SAS e era tare ar So ee a Oct.” “751902 8529 L658 |e oe oe CC (a Re ne Ree I Ue eR Ee MR OS A eh Sa eh ry Ses Nov. 18, 1902 . 8284 U2149y 22 eee GO SEF se Be eS Se EAD aE Fo ee a Jan. 20,1903 . 8726 DPA a GOs see oA tee Re eo See Se Eee UO ea . 8480 11.20|-RhodeAlsland, Greenimgys,...252:52 se; oe oe see oe ee eee ee eee eee Sept. 15, 1902 . 8337 MD Tiel eel GO isc aa hs SRE Se I ee SE Se Rd Sa Oe eee One Oct 7, 1902 . 8297 NIN epee ONS ae en a Se eR EES ea Np RH lg eg ane ee Noy. 18, 1902 . 8272 20210 | Base GO) oie ee ee EE Re SR hla ae ne Jan. 15,1908 S083 PA ai Koj. | te te (0 V0 Yeeeah Oe a ere ee ere Oni eee Li Mads Dek Lorie: Ge Re ate Jan. 28,1903 7994 LI22 |) Northern! S py sac nec Sk oe ee 5 ee ee ee ee Sept. 15, 1902 8513 L239 eee CO: scien cet oe Se ok BS ten ee Oct 7, 1902 $275 Ua eee OO). conn eek ee eee ee aes Nov. 18, 1902 S092 ©1146 OM DAVIS: So jeco epee ee ee eee ae a ee Oct. 23,1902 . 7588 Dot Re ee (1 ee rey ones ae ete See Per Per eo oe nee eke Novy. 18, 1902 7832 II7{0) | | ee O25 Fe ei od ot hon, ee Rr ee doce 7890 rs Bi: 7 Ft Nee GO). ve c8 cones cd Be ae no aes Laren Oct. 23,1902 7T7D4 PANG oS See GO wis scn Se SS ed es BAe ee ee Jan. 20,1903 | . 7722 DNAS ee eee GO oF eee ote eee eee ee een oe | Oct. 23,1902 . 7919 DOU! sears 6 (0 nn a ee mneneee CRU Se aise oo AR dt Jone aos oe seo oe ote Jan. 20,1908 . 7961 iD | sos OO oe iciene bin So ies oe Se ee ae ce Nov. 18, 1902 | 7799 QOD |= cm ae CLO wae mjattinsln oe ab see spice cle e oe ee ae eee are ee Jan. 28,1903 | 7698 887 |....- 6 (0 nie et eevee tals Spcte lS Sa Gin OP ee pee oie aha he tact es oie Feb. 19, 1903 | 7120 FO eee (6 (0 nee Sa eee ene ROR REM le Ee St ee eS ah eg ree a Ge Mar. 3, 19038 7680 @:3803>'|\. 32... GOs. kee oe teee Ee ee ee ere Mar. 18, 1903 7A31 44494 |..... Oran Bsc PEE a os ae eye eatin wren Ce tee ee oe eee re Mar. 30,1903 | 7736 1 Ay pl aa Ge osc: od See is le Ss Oe Fe ee | Apr. 15,1903 | 7684 M5915 |...--. Oe wale aioe shape onus 08 uelal erence cre cen tere Oe eT ee ane Apr. 29, 1903 | 7685 rea Eel lan eae DOs. ean Sean sae ee ese tl ce fr oe ee ene eee eee May 12,1903 7732 Les | ees rhe CLO Sete nia wean Sha tli mle hwo ws MINS leone OO eee eT Jan. 28,1903 7507 aa a ee LL Ss cise a talc a orcas AMIN alge ae Re es ee na nn Mar. 38,1903 | TADS CABZO a: so CLO oaks cate Sosre sc pve whe Cal's 6 lay te IE Re PO nce et nee ee Mar. 31, 1903 | 7645 e6914 |..4.. 0 a AR pe pee ey Se eee Oe ieet eee ers pee ee Apr. 29,1903 | 7703 62500 |e 0 ae GO Sree Ste Me wise nw Wie Sin wk ie a elke ok De eR May 26,1908 | 7529 a Pieked August 15. » Picked september 15, ¢ Pieked September 15-20, ¢Used in respiration experiment, cellar temperature, e Used in respiration experiment, cold-storage temperature, EXAMINATIONS OF APPLE STARCH. 93 The appearance of more intercellular air in the tissues and the con- sequent lessening of the specific gravity of the fruit are also correlated with the *‘mealiness” of the fruit. It is a matter of common knowl- edge that certain apples when ripe are more ** mealy” than others, and that in some varieties this quality increases greatly just before decay. If a small piece of a mealy apple is carefully crushed and then exam- ined under the microscope, it is found that the cells, for the most part, have not been ruptured, but have simply been separated from each other. This has been made possible by the softening of the middle lamelle of the cell walls, which occurs in the last stages of ripening. The middle lamella becomes so very weak that under a slight shearing force it gives way, thus allowing the adjacent cells to separate without rupturing their walls. In the earlier stages of the ripening of the fruit a very different condition exists, because then the middle lamelle are strong, and the cells rupture instead of splitting apart when subjected to pressure. The softening of the middle lamella may also be artificially accom- plished by boiling. starchecontent) ses. =a aaa eae E None. Pirate V.— Yellow Transparent. 6890: July 24, 1903: staréhycomtents Je == eee eran ene eee 0. 35 Serial No. 6894; July 29, 1903; .starch:contente 32 =~ 2 pee s= eee .53 7054; August 24, 1903; starch content.....--...-..- None. August $1,'1903;-starehcontent =ss2ee 2-55. eae None. O a” ae pan te i ee | — Bul. 94, Bureau of Chemistry. U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. PiPAnerle FiG. 1.—APPLE TISSUE, SHOWING STARCH IN CELLS. (ENLARGED 40 DIAMETERS.) FiG. 2.—APPLE STARCH. (ENLARGED 200 DIAMETERS). aw ” Bul. 94, Bureau of Chemistry, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. PLATE Il. 1 | | | | | | | | , | | | | Fig. 1.—August 18, 1903. Fig. 2.—September 25, 1903. Fig. 3.—October 15, 1903. Fig. 4.—October 23, 1903. Fig. 5.—October 30, 1903. Fig. 6.—November 5, 1903. LOCATION AND GRADUAL DISAPPEARANCE OF APPLE STARCH, WINTER PARADISE. Bul. 94, Bureau of Chemistry, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. PLATE III. \| i i Fig. 1.—August 18, 1903. Fig. 2.—September 25, 1903. Fig. 3.—October 23, 1903. Fig. 4.—October 80, 1903. | —<— | POONER cre g Fig. 5.—November 5, 1903. LOCATION AND GRADUAL DISAPPEARANCE OF APPLE STARCH, BEN DAVIS. Bul. $4, Bureau of Chemistry, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. PLATE IV. Fig. 4.—October 23, 1903. ee a — — = Fig. 5.—October 30, 1903. Fig. 6.—November 5, 1903. LOCATION AND GRADUAL DISAPPEARANCE OF APPLE STARCH, HUNTSMAN. Bul. 94, Bureau of Chemistry, U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. PLATE V. Fig. 1.—July 24, 1903. Fig. 2.—July 29, 1903. Fig. 3.—August 24, 1903. Fig. 4.—August 24, 1903, Oh ae \ Fig. 5.—August 31, 1903. LOCATION AND GRADUAL DISAPPEARANCE OF APPLE STARCH, YELLOW TRANSPARENT.