L I B R.ARY OF THE UN IVLR.SITY OF ILLINOIS 57 2. OS .... _• i UNIVERSITY LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN The person charging this material is responsible for its renewal or return to the library on or before the due date. The minimum fee for a lost item is $125.00, $300.00 for bound journals. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for disciplinary action and may result in dismissal from the University. Please note: self-stick notes may result in torn pages and lift some inks. Renew via the Telephone Center at 217-333-8400 846-262-1510 (toll-free) or circlib@uiuc.edu. Renew online by choosing the My Account option at: http://www.library.uiuc.edu/catalog/ 2,05 m ^5 *' ILL^s SURVEY AND EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR BY DONALD COLLIER CURATOR, SOUTH AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY AND ARCHAEOLOGY AND JOHN V. MURRA mtR<Y n ANTHROPOLOGICAL SERIES FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME 35 MAY 15, 1943 PUBLICATION 528 W SURVEY AND EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR SURVEY AND EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR DONALD COLLIER CURATOR, SOUTH AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY AND ARCHAEOLOGY AND JOHN V. MURRA iHfc LIBKAKY OF THE MAY 2 01943 own/Easily of iujnp'> ANTHROPOLOGICAL SERIES FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY VOLUME 35 MAY 15, 1943 PUBLICATION 528 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY FIEID MUSEUM PRESS ) J2-. 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT THE PUBLICATION OF THIS PAPER HAS BEEN MADE POSSIBLE BY A GRANT FROM THE INSTITUTE OF ANDEAN RESEARCH. A LIST OF PUBLICATIONS FOR THE INSTITUTE, OF WHICH THIS PAPER IS NUMBER 9b, APPEARS ON PAGES 107-108. A CONTENTS PAGE List of Illustrations 9 Preface 11 Introduction 15 I. The Survey 18 Southern Chimborazo 18 Zula 18 Maguaso 22 Alausi 23 Azuay-Cahar Region 26 Loja Province 30 Carapali 31 Chilpas 32 Guando 32 Catamayo Valley 33 II. Cerro Narrio 35 Introduction 35 Excavations 36 Pottery 44 Cerro Narrio Wares • 46 Narrio Red-on-Buff 46 Variant A 49 Variant B 49 Variant C 49 Variant D 50 Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine 50 Canar Polished 53 Granulated Ware 54 Narrio Gross 54 Clay Seats or Drums 56 Intrusive Wares 56 Group X 58 Quartz-Studded 58 Red Engraved 58 Black Engraved 59 Gray Engraved 59 Glossy Red Engraved 59 7 8 CONTENTS PACE Glossy Red Negative 60 Red Banded Incised 61 Puruha-Tuncahuan 62 Elen Pata 62 San Sebastian 63 Tuncahuan 63 Peruvian Influences 66 Artifacts 67 Stone 67 Bone 68 Shell 69 Metal 69 Clay 70 Houses 70 Burials 72 III. Other Sites in the Canar Valley 74 IV. Prehistory of Canar Valley 79 V. Conclusions 86 Appendix A: Paste Analysis of Cerro Narrio Wares, by Sharat K. Roy 91 Appendix B: Distribution of Sherds by Trench Levels at Cerro Narrio 92 Bibliography 95 Index 103 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES 1. Pottery and metate from Zula. 2. Pottery from Zula. 3-4. Pottery from Hacienda Maguaso. 5. Pottery from Alausi and Guasuntos. 6. Sherds from Alausi. 7. Sherds from Macas. 8-10. Pottery from Azuay. 11. Sherds from Sumay Pamba and Guando. 12. Sherds from Trapichillo, Catamayo Valley. 13. Cerro Narrio: general views. 14. Cerro Narrio: views of site and Trench 6. 15. Cerro Narrio: Trench 1 and hearth in Trench 4. 16-17. Narrio Red-on-Buff. 18. Narrio Red-on-Buff: decorative features. 19. Narrio Red-on-Buff: Variants A, B and C. 20. Narrio Red-on-Buff: Variant D. 21-23. Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine. 24. Cerro Narrio: anthropomorphic and zoomorphic decorations. 25-26. Canar Polished. 27. Cerro Narrio: granulated ware and compoteras with painted feet. 28. Narrio Gross. 29. Narrio Gross and Quartz-Studded. 30. Clay seats. 31. Red Engraved and Black Engraved. 32. Glossy Red Engraved. 33. Glossy Red Engraved and Gray Engraved. 34. Glossy Red Negative, Glossy Red Engraved and Red Banded Incised. 35-36. Elen Pata. 37. San Sebastian. 38. Tuncahuan: Variant A. 39. Tuncahuan: Variant B. 40. Tuncahuan: Variant D. 41. Tuncahuan: Variants C, E and F. 42-43. Cerro Narrio: unique sherds of possible coastal affiliation. 44. Cerro Narrio: unique sherds. 45. Inca pottery. 46. Inca and Chimu pottery. 47. Cerro Narrio: stone artifacts. 48. Cerro Narrio: bone artifacts. 49. Shell artifacts. 50. Metal artifacts. 51. Clay artifacts. 52-54. Vessels and sherds of Cashaloma type. 10 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS TEXT FIGURES PAGE 1. Ground plan and section of Churo de Llullin, Zula 19 2. Ground plan of corrals at Zula 21 3. Map showing archaeological sites at Sumay Pamba 30 4. Plan of north section of Trench 1, Cerro Narrio 37 5. Vertical section of east wall of Trench 1, Cerro Narrio 39 6. Plan of Trench 3, Cerro Narrio, showing postholes of Late house ... 40 7. Plan of Trench 4, Cerro Narrio, showing postholes of Late house ... 41 8. Plan showing postholes and stones of upper house in Trench 6, Cerro Narrio 43 9. Plan showing postholes of lower house in Trench 6, Cerro Narrio ... 45 10. Narrio Red-on-Buff rim forms 47 11. Rim forms of Narrio Red-on-Buff, Variant C 49 12. Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine rim forms 51 13. Carlar Polished rim forms 55 14. Narrio Gross rim forms 57 15. Narrio Red-on-Buff rim forms at Shillu 74 16. Percentage distribution by trench level of Cerro Narrio wares 79 17. Schematic representation of Narrio ceramic chronology 80 18. Chronological positions of sites in Cahar Valley 83 MAPS PACING TAGE 1. Map of Ecuador, showing archaeological sites 11 2. Map of Canar Valley 36 3. Map of Cerro Narrio, showing trenches excavated 38 %^s^? "^ PREFACE This report presents the results of field work carried out in Ecuador during the fall and winter of 1941. The authors spent three months in the southern highland making a brief survey of the general region and excavating in the Province of Canar. The expedition was one of ten archaeological projects in Central and South America sent out by the Institute of Andean Research under the sponsorship of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs. The Institute financed the field work and largely financed the cost of publishing this report. We are particularly indebted to Dr. George C. Vaillant, Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Institute, and to Dr. Fay-Cooper Cole, of the University of Chicago, who was Director of the Ecuador project. We wish to express our gratitude to Colonel Clifford C. Gregg, Director of Field Museum, through whose co-operation and inter- est it was made possible for the senior author to be absent from the Museum in order to participate in the expedition, and who made available to us the facilities of the Museum while we were organizing the expedition, and during the time that this report was in preparation. Field Museum also contributed to the cost of publishing the report. During our stay in Ecuador we made many friends and received hospitality and assistance from numerous individuals. Foremost among these was Sr. Anibal Buitron Chaves, who spent three months with the expedition. Sr. Buitron was an ever-cheerful companion, and undertook enthusiastically and efficiently the tasks of survey work and excavation. To him should go a share of the credit for the results that were achieved. We shall remember with warm pleasure the days passed with him in the field. Without the good will and assistance which we received from officials of the Ecuadorean government, our work would have been impossible. To Dr. Julio Tobar Donoso, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Dr. Abelardo Montalvo, Minister of Education, and Dr. A. Aguilar Vasquez, Minister of Interior, we wish especially to acknowledge our indebtedness for issuing letters of recommendation to public officials in the area where we travelled, and for facilitating our work in other ways. We were cordially received and materially assisted by the National Academy of History in Quito. This organization took a 11 12 PREFACE lively interest in our plans and problems, and through its good offices we made essential contacts with government officials and with other persons who were helpful to us. The Academy further assisted us by appointing a commission to inspect the archaeological material which we recovered. Through the recommendation of this commis- sion, and of the Academy, we received the necessary official permits to bring the material to the United States for study. We wish to thank the following officials of the Academy: Dr. Julio Tobar Donoso, Director; Cristobal de Gangotena y Jijon, Sub-Director; J. Roberto Paez, Secretary; Senator Isaac Barrera, Editor of the Boletin; and Dr. Jose Gabriel Navarro. We are especially grateful to Sr. Carlos Vivanco, Chief of the Boundary Archives and Pro- Secretary of the Academy, for many kindnesses. Dr. J. Jijon y Caamano, the leading archaeologist of Ecuador, graciously gave us access to his magnificent archaeological collection in Quito, and permitted us to photograph specimens from southern Ecuador. He was very helpful while we were becoming oriented, and made useful suggestions concerning the material we collected in the field. United States Ambassador Boaz Long took a personal interest in our work and helped us in innumerable ways. For his friendship and assistance we are most grateful. He enthusiastically supported the plan to have an Ecuadorean participate in our field work, and he gave us material help in arranging for Sr. Buitron to accompany us. We wish also to thank Messrs. Gerald Drew, Harry Reed, Sam Olden, Jr., and Alexander Hurd, all of the Embassy staff, for technical assistance, encouragement, and friendship. We wish to acknowledge our indebtedness to Mr. and Mrs. Edwin N. Ferdon, Jr. Since 1939 Mr. Ferdon has been conducting an archaeological survey in Ecuador for the School of American Research and the University of Southern California, under the auspices of the National Academy of History in Quito. To the Ferdons we are grateful for many kindnesses, and for advice and invaluable assistance while in Ecuador and after our return to the United States. While in the field, we received hospitality and assistance from many individuals. Sr. Bolivar Guevara and his brother, Alonso, were our hosts at Hacienda Zula, and generously gave us every facility. We carried away with us from Zula happy memories of our visit. Sr. Carlos Arias Eguiguren gave us valuable informa- tion about Loja, and arranged for us to stay at his three haciendas, PREFACE 13 Carapali, Seucer, and Sumay Pamba, in the Canton of Saraguro. Sr. Carlos Burneo, National Deputy for Loja, made available to us the facilities of Hacienda Uduzhi in Saraguro. We are greatly indebted to Sr. Leandro Torres, of Cuenca, and his son, Alfonso, for permission to excavate at Cerro Narrio and Shillu, and to Sra. Esther Palacios de Martinez and her mother for allowing us to work at Cashaloma. Sr. Ezequiel Clavijo, of Cafiar, was helpful to us on our first visit to Canar, and later in selecting undisturbed areas for excavation at Cerro Narrio. Special thanks are due our obreros at Canar, who worked faithfully and took turns guarding the excavations at night. For permission to study and photograph their archaeological collections we are grateful to the following persons: Sr. J. Jijon y Caamano, of Quito; Padre Eugenio Goetz and Sr. Angel Alberto Gallegos, of Riobamba; the Mother Superior of the Convento San Francisco de Sales, Alausi; the Rector of the Colegio Benigno Malo (Arriaga Collection), Sr. Joaquin Cordoba (Cordero Collection), and Padre Miguel Duran, all in Cuenca; Sr. Jose' Pio Eguiguren (Le- querica Collection), Loja; and Sr. Max Konanz, Guayaquil. Ing. Jacobo Vorbeck presented interesting specimens to the expedition. Sr. Carlos Zevallos Men^ndez, Director of the Museum at the Colegio Vicente Rocafuerte in Guayaquil, gave us help in becoming oriented in Ecuador. We wish to mention also the warm hospitality and friendship of Misses Anne B. Cacioppo and Bertha Marsch in Quito. The following persons also were generous in giving us help and information: Dr. Victor Gabriel Garc6s, Quito; Sr. Alfredo Chaves, Quito; Mr. Juan L. Gorrel, Quito; Sr. Pablo Hanibal Vela, Director del Departamento de Turismo, Quito; Dr. W. C. Mclntyre, Banos; Sr. Miguel Wagner, Guayaquil; Sr. Arturo Montesinos Malo and Dr. Tomas Vega Toral, Cuenca; the Rector of the Colegio Bernardo Valdivieso, Loja; Mr. John McClung, Loja; and Mr. Maurice Stacey, San Lucas. In the preparation of this report we have received the help of numerous individuals. We are especially grateful to Dr. Paul S. Martin, Chief Curator of the Department of Anthropology in Field Museum, for wise advice and constant encouragement. We wish also to thank the following members of the Museum staff: Dr. Sharat K. Roy, Curator of Geology, for identification of minerals and for the preparation and examination of micro-sections of pottery; Dr. Fritz Haas, Curator of Lower Invertebrates, for identification 14 PREFACE of shells; Mr. George Quimby, Assistant Curator of American Archaeology, for help in pottery analysis; Mr. John Pletinckx, for ceramic restoration; Mr. Robert Yule, Assistant in Archaeology, for his careful execution of maps and plans; and Mr. John Janecek, Staff Illustrator, for making drawing and charts. We are indebted to Mrs. Iva Osanai Schmitt and Mr. Leonard Johnson for aid in sorting and classifying pottery. Finally, we are grateful to Miss Lillian Ross, Associate Editor of Scientific Publications, for seeing the report through the press. Donald Collier September 2, 19^2 John V. Murra INTRODUCTION Our original intention in going to Ecuador had been to conduct a survey in the extreme southern highland to determine the relation of earlier archaeological material to the known late Inca horizon, and to discover what tie-ups there were, if any, with northern Peru. Upon our arrival in Quito in September, 1941, this plan had to be modified because of the conflict between Peru and Ecuador, which made work in southernmost Ecuador impossible. After further reading in the literature, we decided to work in the southern highland, even though we could not penetrate as far south as originally planned. The central and northern highlands were already known from the extensive work of Sr. Jijon (1914, 1920a,. 1927) and others. The central coast was known from the work of Saville (1907, 1910). For the past two years Edwin N. Ferdon, Jr., had been carrying out an extensive survey in the coastal region, as well as excavations on Santa Elena peninsula (1940b, 1941a). Verneau and Rivet (1912, 1922) had illustrated pottery vessels from the southern highland. Uhle had done some preliminary work in the region, and both he (1922c, 1928b, 1931) and Jijon (1930) had published interpretative discussions of the area, although systematic descriptive data were few. The southern coast was and is archaeologically unknown, but the military situation there eliminated that area as a place to work. It was therefore decided to make a reconnaissance in the southern part of the Province of Chimborazo, and in the provinces of Canar, Azuay, and Loja, with the hope of finding one or more sites that would yield stratigraphic data. Uhle reported finding in the southern highland a clear Inca horizon, as well as two other cultures, one of which he called "Mayoid" and traced directly from Central America, and the other which he believed to have been derived from the "Mayoid" cul- ture. He related this early "Mayoid" culture to Proto-Nazca in Peru. The month of September was spent in Quito for orientation and in order to secure the necessary government permits. Very helpful contacts were made with members of the National Academy of History and with other persons interested in Ecuadorean archaeology. Arrangements were made with Sr. Bolivar Guevara to visit his hacienda in southern Chimborazo, and with Sr. Carlos Arias to visit his haciendas in the Canton of Saraguro in Loja. 15 16 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR It was our intention to take with us into the field a young Ecuadorean to gain experience in archaeology. Through the efforts of Dr. Jaime Barrera of Quito we met Sr. Anibal Buitron Chaves, a young Quito school teacher with a keen interest in the prehistory and present-day Indian population of his country. As a result of the interest of Dr. Abelardo Montalvo, Minister of Education, Sr. Buitron was given a leave of absence from his teaching duties, and he spent three months with us in the field. The month of October was spent in the Province of Chimborazo. For ten days we were the guests of Sr. Guevara and his brothers at Hacienda Zula, on the high paramo on the upper Chambo drainage in southern Chimborazo. Here we carried out a surface survey and made test excavations in several places. From Zula we returned to Riobamba, where we made brief trips along the Chambo River and to Punin, and studied and photo- graphed the collections of Padre Goetz, at the Colegio San Felipe, and of Sr. Alberto Gallegos. The former collection contained pottery from Zula, as well as from the general vicinity of Riobamba, and the latter consisted of pottery from Hacienda Maguaso on the middle Chambo. From Riobamba we went to Alausi in order to study a collection at the Convento San Francisco de Sales. This collection was of special interest because it contained sherds which tied up with finds made later in Canar to the south. From Alausi we proceeded by train to Tambo, and thence by automobile to Cuenca. The month of November was spent in a rapid survey in the provinces of Azuay, Canar, and Loja, and in the study of three important collections in Cuenca, namely, the Arriaga Collection at the Colegio Benigno Malo, the collection of Padre Miguel Duran, and the Cordero Collection. The most im- portant site visited from Cuenca was Cerro Narrio near Canar, one of Uhle's "Mayoid" sites. The trip from Cuenca to Loja was made by plane. While in Loja we inspected the Lequerica Collection, and visited one local site and two sites in the Catamayo Valley to the west of Loja. From Loja we proceeded by muleback northward, and in the Canton of Saraguro we visited four sites. These were Carapali, Chilpas near Hacienda Seucer, Guando, which we reached from Hacienda Uduzhi, and Sumay Pamba on the Rio Jubones. The last site was of special interest because it tied up with Cerro Narrio. Upon our return to Cuenca, we had reached the conclusion that the most favorable place to carry out excavations was in the Canar INTRODUCTION 17 Valley, because of the variety of ceramic types found there and be- cause there was good promise of encountering stratified deposits at Cerro Narrio. Accordingly, we established headquarters at Cafiar, and during December we excavated at Cerro Narrio and at two other sites in the valley. Although Cerro Narrio had been gutted by treasure hunters and was literally covered with pits and craters, we were able to find small undisturbed areas on various parts of the site. Strati- graphic excavation in deposits two to three meters in depth revealed a clear transition from early to late ceramic types, with intrusive influences from the north in late times. The cross-checking of the Narrio sequence with the ceramics from Shillu and Cashaloma, two shallow, late sites in the same valley, confirmed the coming in of northern wares in late times, and added the final Inca horizon. Upon completion of the work in Cafiar, the excavated material was sent to Quito, where it was washed and packed for shipment to the United States. The material is deposited at Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago. The period of three months spent in southern Ecuador was too brief to accomplish more than a preliminary attack on the area. Our reconnaissance, in particular, barely scratched the surface, and it was weakest in the Province of Azuay, where there are remains definitely related to those of the Cafiar Valley. The principal con- tribution of our work has been the establishing of a stratigraphic sequence for the Cahar Valley, and the placing in this sequence of certain intrusive wares from the Puruha region and elsewhere to the north. I. THE SURVEY One of the first problems facing the survey was the gap between the Puruha area, north of Riobamba, which had been investigated and reported on by Sr. Jijon y Caamano, and the southern provinces for which "Mayoid" cultures had been reported by Uhle. At the time of the survey, only one small collection from this area was known in the literature (Uhle, 1931, pp. 32-36) but the published data were promising. Southern Chimborazo zula Before our departure from Quito, Sr. Bolivar Guevara invited us to visit his property lying in the southeast corner of the Province of Chimborazo, at the headwaters of the Chambo River. Some archaeological remains had been excavated in the past in this area, and several structures, allegedly of Incaic origin, had been reported. From the point of view of our interests the ranch was ideally located, and we went there early in October. The Zula ranch house lies in a valley at an elevation of 3,650 meters on the paramo, southeast of Palmira and due east of Alausi. The rest of the ranch lies between 3,800 and 4,000 meters, high on a windswept, grassy plateau just north of the great Nudo del Azuay, the natural wall connecting the two Cordilleras and separating Chimborazo from southern Ecuador. Near Palmira we saw the "queen's steps" (Proano, 1918g) which seemed to be nothing but agricultural terraces. Certainly their size prevented them from being steps for anybody but a race of giants in forty-league boots. In the Zula area we were told of six churos, allegedly Inca tambos or resting stations for messengers or the armed forces. Their name, which in Quechua means "snail," comes from their alleged spiral character. We visited two of these structures: Churo de" Llullin and Churo de Chuqui Pucara. The following other churos were listed for the area: Pomamarca, Chiniguayco, Potrero, and Rey Llilla. The last is supposed to be the largest. The churos are usually placed on high points dominating the neighboring countryside and have stone-faced terraces built concentrically. There is no. spiral ramp of any kind connected with them. The walls are made of irregular rocks piled up without any mortar. At Llullin (Fig. 1), 18 THE SURVEY 19 about 3 km. northeast of Zula, the topmost platform carries a small circular stone structure about 2 meters high, with a small rectangular chamber north of it. At the eastern end of the basic platform there is a large rectangular stone structure. At Llullin several pits were sunk on the different platforms, in the central circular structure and in the eastern chamber, with disappointing results. The few sherds found were coarse and non- FlG. 1. Ground plan and section of Churo de Llullin, Zula. descript, and did not help in identifying the builders of these structures. These churos differ from lambos and other structures of the Incas described by Verneau and Rivet (1912, pp. 76-78) for the area, in size, configuration, and absence of worked stone. Who their builders were is as yet not clear, although the Incas probably did not do the job. We were also unable to identify the builders of numerous corrals spread through the countryside. They are multicameral structures with floors somewhat below ground level. The stone walls are about 2 meters thick and from 1 to 2 meters high. At Challan, on a ridge above Zula, a test trench 1 by 2 meters was sunk in the corner of one of these enclosures, which was 24 by 16 meters (Fig. 2). The soil was very hard, with a few nondescript sherds, and hardpan was reached at 63 cm. The walls, which were 2 meters thick and about 20 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR 2 meters high, were carelessly constructed of large, undressed boulders. The floor appeared to have been sunk below the base of the wall. There is no indication as to the possible use of these structures. There were more than twenty on this ridge alone. Several other spots in the area were examined, and several trenches eventually sunk on a flat ridge to the east of Challan (called by us Z6). A trench 3 meters long and 1.5 meters wide was sunk into the brown soil, and a profusion of sherds was recovered. Apparently this place was an interment ground, as nine burials were opened within a very limited space. We were not able to locate the village site to which this burial ground belonged. From the ceramic evidence, the people of Z6 were a jire-Jncaic group clearly related to Puruha groups farther north (Jijon, 1927). Though it may be possible, and quite likely, that they were the builders of the churos and corrals discussed above, no concrete evidence was uncovered to support such a hypothesis. Injury case, they appearjto have been a fairly late group, practicing agriculture, Ujsing theMlama. and possessing a knowledge of metallurgy. The most prevalent ceramic type in burials at Z6 is the globular jar with one lug (PI. 1, Figs. 1, 2, and 4). In one instance there are two lugs, both on the same side of the vessel. Some of the jars are unslipped and unpolished, while others show red slip and are somewhat smoothed and polished. In a few cases there is a negative black design between shoulder and rim, with white painted lines delimiting the field (PI. 1, Fig. 4). A red-slipped, polished compotera1 also was found in a burial. The supporting foot is perforated in three places (PI. 1, Fig. 5). A small jar with flaring rim is slipped white all over the outside. Just inside the rim is a band of red, and there may have been some red dots on the outside also. Several bowl forms are present in the sherd material. One of them is polished inside and out, except for an area on the outside of the bottom. There is some dark red slip on the inside of the vessels. Other bowls are plain and unslipped. Some of the rims also suggest larger jars with flaring rims, of coarser pottery. They are heavily grit- tempered, and are less well finished than the forms described above. Some notched rims, ears, and lugs on and below the rim, and an occasional handle complete 1 The compotera ("fruit bowl") is a footed bowl found frequently in Ecuador, Colombia, and Panama. THE SURVEY 21 the picture of Z6 ceramic forms. In the case of one of the larger vessels, a band of crudely incised chevrons, reminiscent of Puruha designs, is found on the upper shoulder. Various members of the family owning the land have excavated at one time or another on their property, and their finds have been dispersed among collectors. Father Eugenio Goetz of Riobamba, who owns an interesting collection, has received several Zula pieces SITE Zi (ZULA) Fig. 2. Ground plan of corrals at Zula. which expand our knowledge of Upper Chambo ceramics and rein- force their bonds to the north. Thus a vessel with anthropomorphic neck and two double ears or handles (PI. 2, Fig. 4) Is clearly Puruha, although it lacks the negative design so characteristic of Elen Pata (Jijon, 1927, vol. 1, pis. 53-71). Other Zula types found in the collection include a polished red cantimplora1 with white bands on the neck (PI. 2, Fig. 1), several jars and cantimploras with negative designs on the body (PI. 2, Figs. 3 and 6), and several bowls, round or shaped like a truncated cone, with "drinking tube" (PI. 2, Figs. 2, 5, and 7). All have their parallels in the Puruha area (Jijon, 1927, vol. 1, pi. 109). 1 The cantimplora ("canteen") is a jar with tall neck and is flattened from front to back, suggesting an army canteen. The term is applied to this form of vessel throughout the Andes. 22 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR The forms in this collection are not the product of stratigraphic excavation, and may have come from several levels. The parallels with Puruha crosscut the periods established for that area by Sr. Jijon and are simpler and cruder than the prototypes. Only addi- tional excavation will clear up the exact relationship, but it appears that Puruha people drifted up onto the paramo, leaving some of the fancier trimmings farther north. We recovered few artifacts from the Zula area. A large stone metate (PI. 1, Fig. 3), a well-worn and sturdy object, points to the agricultural occupations of the people. Today barley and potatoes are grown at this altitude, but not maize. Although numerous llama bones were found in the debris, we did not encounter any bone tools. This lack could probably be overcome through excavation in house sites. A slim, fairly well-worked copper topu was found in Burial 9 at Z6. MAGUASO Following the Chambo River north, there is a site south of Pungala on the Maguaso hacienda belonging to Sr. Angel Alberto Gallegos. It is quite probable that the site was a stratified one, but it was not scientifically excavated. The collection is now in Riobamba where we had the opportunity to examine it. Pungala is listed as being within the main area of Puruha occupancy (Jijon, 1927, vol. 1, p. 2). The ceramics seem to fit the general Chimborazo- Puruha pattern, but there are several new forms and decorations. The following types were noted in the Gallegos Collection. Incised jars are numerous and are incised on the body. Triangles and chevrons are the main decorative elements (PI. 3, Figs. 1, 2, and 4). There are eight bowls placed on low tripods (PI. 3, Fig. 6). Most of these have lugs below the rim and triple incised lines along the body. The inside of one bowl is divided into quadrants filled ith incised hatchings and concentric diamonds (PI. 3, Fig. 3). The compotera, that ubiquitous Chimborazo form, is also present. The supporting foot is sometimes perforated. Most of the vessels are shallow and undecorated. In one case a negative design, 4 cm. wide, is found on the rim of the bowl. The inside is painted red along the rim and has a red circular spot in the center. The tie-up with Tuncahuan compoteras from farther north is unmistakable. A very unusual compotera is illustrated in Plate 4, Figure 5. The foot is white, slipped, and hollow. The bottom, between foot T THE SURVEY 23 and shoulder, has a black slip, while from there to the rim the vessel is slipped white again. On this white slip black chevrons and diagonal lines have been painted, some of them with an orange outline. Another vessel, a double tripod with hoja de cabuya1 legs, has a similar red band on the inside of the bowls, and a red spot in the center of each. The two bowls are connected through a hole in their joint wall. The arc connecting them is not functional (PI. 3, Fig. 5). A red-slipped tripod jar with four double, incised welts is a more unusual piece (PI. 3, Fig. 7). The bottoms of the feet are incised, to imitate toes. This ornamentation shows affiliation with Huavalac pottery, in the Puruha region, as does a black jar (PI. 3, Fig. 4). Another ware, represented by two bowls and a tall jar with flaring rim, has pink or reddish slip with geometric white painted designs (PL 4, Figs. 1, 2, and 4). A jar unusual in both shape and decoration is illustrated in Plate 4, Figure 3. The whole body is covered with a whitish slip. There are several black parallel negative lines around the neck. The area between the lines is painted red. On the body there are several double and single scrolls outlined in negative painting with the whitish dots shining through. The scrolls are then painted red. It looks like an exuberant Tuncahuan form. ALAUSI The one collection from the area which was mentioned in the literature came from Alausi (Uhle, 1931, pp. 32 fl\), a town in southern Chimborazo, on the Quito-Guayaquil railroad. Here the Salesian Mothers had assembled in their convent2 a small museum containing numerous pieces from the coast of Ecuador and also some from the Alausi area. Most of these local wares came from one pit and were quite different from archaeological materials to the north as well as from those of Zula, located due east from Alausi. Their known affiliations are clearly to the south, in the Cafiar Valley, though even there they are distinctly intrusive.3 1 "Leaf of century plant" (agave), a name suggested by Sr. Jijon (1927, vol. 2, p. 149). 2 San Francisco de Sales. 3 These unusual wares at Alausi were found on the property of Sra. Cristina Ricaurte. 24 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR These ceramic forms are characterized by very good, thin pottery, slipped and polished on the outside and ornamented with engraved designs from rim to shoulder. According to Uhle (1931, p. 33, footnote 1) the best pieces of this type were taken to Quito and lost in the fire which seriously damaged the Universidad Central there in 1929. Incidentally, a manuscript dealing with these wares was also lost.1 The fragments still available are not numerous and fall into the following categories: Glossy Black Engraved is a type of varying thickness, having numerous rows of punctates (PI. 5, Figs. 1-4). Punctate zones are separated by engraved lines from polished zones which may be plain or engraved with single or double circles. The grooves created through engraving are filled with limonite. The shapes seem to run to straight-walled jars. Black Engraved is less polished and designs are created through alteration of hatched and plain polished fields (PI. 5, Figs. 5-7). Rhom- boids, triangles, and step-designs are frequent. Gray Engraved, with the exception of the paste color, is similar to Black Engraved (PI. 5, Fig. 9). Brown Engraved is probably a variety of Black Engraved (PI. 5, Fig. 10). The shoulder of a jar with flaring rim is decorated with engraved triangles, the alternating areas being hatched. Glossy Red Engraved is a buff ware with red slip on the out- side surface, and is characterized by the absence of punctate zones. While the shapes are similar to Black Engraved, the lines here are really linear punctates, which are also filled with limonite. Straight lines, cross-designs, hatched rhomboids, and occasionally curved lines are the ornamental motifs (PI. 6, Figs. 1-5, and 8). The ware is highly polished. A variety of this ware, while polished all over, is slipped only in certain delimited areas. Thus, in Plate 6, Figures 6 and 7, the inside of the step-design and the group of concentric circles are red, while the rest is the natural color of the clay. This suggests that the engraving took place after the vessel was sun-dried, but before it was painted and fired. A very thin variety of Gray Engraved is represented by only two sherds, with engraved groups of three concentric circles (PI. 6, Figs. 9-10). 1 Communication from Uhle to Sr. Vicente Merchan, editor of the Alausi weekly newspaper. THE SURVEY 25 A few fragments of globular jars with carelessly engraved zones on a red-slipped body are also found (PL 5, Figs. 11-13). They differ in thickness, shape, and surface treatment from other engraved wares and have no parallels elsewhere. The collection at Alausi also contains an interesting ware with bands delimited by incised lines. Alternate areas are painted red and polished. Owing to the fragmentary nature of these vessels it is hard to make out the designs employed. A T-form band is fre- quent, with additional sharp-angled bands (PI. 6, Figs. 11-12, and 15). This ware is much thicker than any others in the collection. It is found farther south and also at Macas, in the Oriente. We have applied to this ware the name Red Banded Incised. Large vessels, of cruder pottery, with tall upright walls and bottoms studded on the inside with bits of quartz are also found (PL 6, Figs. 13-14). Each studded row is separated by an incised line. Presumably these were yuca (manioc) graters, and similar vessels have been found to the south and west. Finally, a few sherds of Narrio Red-on-Buff (see detailed dis- cussion in Chapter II) are also found (PL 5, Figs. 14-17). Besides the unusual wares described above, the Alausi area has produced ceramic evidence that ties it up with the rest of the Province of Chimborazo and its aboriginal inhabitants, the Puruha. Thus, Sr. Merchan has in his possession a globular jar with one lug, with white painted designs all around the rim. This jar strikingly resembles the negative painted vessel from Zula (PL 1, Fig. 4). Also a small compotera, well smoothed, with negative design on body and rim, and red overpaint, seems to tie up very well with similar Tuncahuan vessels discovered in the heart of the Puruha country. The Salesian Mothers have also witnessed excavations at Gua- suntos, where apparently Incaic-influenced vessels were recovered. Their similarity with Puruha-Incaic vessels from farther north is close (Jijon, 1927, vol. II, pi. 134). The same burial yielded a triple red bowl with communicating sections, with white painted designs (PL 5, Fig. 8). Other pieces in the convent's museum confirm the tie-up with Zula, already suggested by Sr. Merchan's vessels. They come from all over the Alausi area and are the usual globular jars and com- poteras. One undecorated cantimplora and a small, well-smoothed truncated conical vessel from Gonzol complete the collection. 26 excavations in southern ecuador Azuay-Canar Region Cuenca is the largest city in southern Ecuador and the natural urban center for the area. After finishing our work at Alausi, we went to Cuenca to examine its collections and determine our future line of activity. Southern Ecuador was occupied in pre-Incaic times by the Cafiari people and was conquered by the Incas during the reign of Tupac Yupanqui in the middle of the fifteenth century. The in- fluence of the Incas can be clearly seen in this region, where they built Tomebamba, a large imperial center, near whose site modern Cuenca is located. They also built Inga-pirca, a fortress near Cafiar, and many other smaller places. These structures have been studied and described in various publications (see Uhle, 1923c; also Jijon, 1929; Arriaga, 1922; Vega Toral, 1920, 1928, 1929; Matovelle, n.d., and 1921). On the other hand, the pre-Incaic peoples in the area, the Canari in Azuay and Cahar and the Paltas in Loja, are much less known, particularly in so far as identification of archaeological remains with ethnographic data is concerned. The Canari language is insufficiently known; it became extinct some time during the seven- teenth century and only a limited vocabulary based mostly on place names and patronymics has been worked out (Cordero Palacios, 1924; Jijon, 1919b, pp. 375-380; Verneau and Rivet, 1912, pp. 29- 36). Several affiliations of this language have been suggested. Arriaga felt that the Canari had Carib affiliations (Arriaga, 1922, pp. 79-95), but his evidence is insufficient. Uhle had thought at an earlier time that there was a close relationship between Canari and Mochica, spoken on the north coast of Peru (Jijon, 1927, vol. 2, p. 201). At a later date (Uhle, 1931, p. 11) he felt that the Canari spoke a Chorotegan language, which is not so great a contradiction, as he felt that the Chimu civilization of the North Coast and the "Mayoid" cultures of Carlar were both of direct Central American descent. Sr. Jijon (Jijon, 1927, vol. 2, pp. 201 ff.) has proposed a grouping of several southern Ecuadorean and north Peruvian languages into a Puruha-Mochica family, of which Canari would be a member, although it is admitted that Puruha and Canari were apparently mutually unintelligible. The whole matter requires additional investigation, which Sr. Jijon has undertaken and which may be forthcoming in his latest work, of which only the first volume, dealing with the northern part of the country, is now available (Jijon, 1941). THE SURVEY 27 Whatever the linguistic affiliations, there was no archaeological complex available which could be definitely labeled as Canari. Antiquities from this area had been discussed and photographically reproduced, but it was clear that the authors were dealing with several complexes which had not been separated through strati- graphic excavation (Gonzalez Suarez, 1878, 1892; Verneau and Rivet, 1912, 1922; Arriaga, 1922). It can be presumed that at least the later horizons within the area, particularly those showing strong Incaic influences, are representative of' the Canari people. These late horizons vary considerably within the area here under consideration. Preoccupied with the relation of the "Mayoid" cultures reported for the area by Uhle (Uhle, 1922c) to the expected Canari remains, as well as with their alleged Central American origins, we under- took a study of the local collections. The largest ceramic group in the area is housed in the local colegio. It was collected by Sr. Ezequiel Clavijo in the Province of Cafiar and sold by him to the school, which has decided to use it as the nucleus for a museum, named after the late Jesus Arriaga. Most of the materials in this collection are from Cerro Narrio, although Inga-pirca and several other sites in the Canar region are also represented. There was no doubt of the Inca horizon in this area, as many ceramic specimens have an indubitable Cuzco cast. It was hard to distinguish clearly among the numerous other forms, and a trip to Cerro Narrio seemed indicated. The abundance of surface sherds found by us at Cerro Narrio, their obvious relation to the "Mayoid" wares described by Uhle, and the apparent existence of stratified remains there, induced us to return eventually to this place for an intensive excavation. In Cuenca we also visited the collections of the late Luis Cordero and of Padre Miguel T. Duran. Most of the material in these collections came from east and southeast of Cuenca in the Chordeleg, Sigsig, and Quinjeo areas. Several attempts to deepen our under- standing of these forms through a visit to Chordeleg were frustrated because the bridges were washed out. The problem of why late horizons in the Canar area are so different from similarly late horizons in the eastern Azuay area is as yet unsolved. Both areas were presumably inhabited by the Canari people before the coming of the Incas and both have an early "Mayoid" horizon. The careful survey of eastern Azuay is most important for future archaeological work in southern Ecuador. 28 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR A detailed description and discussion of Canar ceramics and artifacts will be found in Chapters II, III, and IV. At present, there are no archaeological data based on systematic excavation for the Province of Azuay. Azuay pottery, as known from the above collections and from the abundant illustrations in Verneau and Rivet (1922), seems to contain numerous anthropo- morphic forms usually represented by human faces engraved or modeled on necks of jars. Three different treatments of the human face can be distinguished. A. The eyes are an incised circle with a central punctate. The nose is modeled with lateral punctates for nostrils. The mouth is usually an incised line. In some instances the eyes and mouth are engraved rather than incised. The ears are small and modeled, with a punctate. These vessels are slipped red and some have no other decoration on the body (PI. 8, Figs. 1-4); others are engraved all over the body with a charac- teristic step-and-zigzag design (PI. 9, Figs. 1-4, and 6). B. The second type is characterized by modeled, coffee-bean eyes, long, prominent nose with punctate nostrils, large, modeled ears, and a modeled ridge outlining the lower face. The body may be slipped but otherwise plain (PI. 9, Fig. 5), or it may be decorated with engravings (PI. 9, Figs. 7-9). This type is found through much the same area as type A, as well as in late horizons at Cerro Narrio. C. The two vessels of the third group came from the region of Azogues and Chordeleg and are slipped a deep red, both inside and out. The eye is a modeled ellipsoid, surrounded by a modeled ridge. The nose is modeled, with flaring nostrils. Eyebrows are also modeled. Ears are in low relief, while the mouth is made of two semi-lunar ridges with prominent, pendent, lower lip. One of the vessels has handles and one has a series of modeled loops above the maximum diameter (PI. 10, Figs. 1-3; cf. also Verneau and Rivet, 1922, pi. 46, fig. 1). There are two similar vessels in the Lequerica Collection in Loja, but their provenience is not known. There are other forms reported for the area, but they are not very numerous and the sample is not large enough to allow classifica- tion. A very interesting vessel (PI. 10, Fig. 4) in the Duran Collec- tion is reported to have come from the Descanso area between Azogues and Cuenca. It is of coastal Chavin type and is supposed to have been washed out of a bank by the rains. A diligent search THE SURVEY 29 by our group on the hills from which the find was reported failed to reveal any sherds of similar type. The fragments found there showed definite Incaic decorations and were usually of a coarse, utilitarian ware. Also of interest is a double communicating jar with overall negative painting on the outside (PI. 10, Fig. 5). Such negative polka dots are suggestive of early ceramics in the Province of Chimborazo. Gold objects have frequently been found in the area, sometimes in amazing quantities. Detailed description and discussion can be found in Uhle (1922b), Gonzalez Suarez (1878), Saville (1924), and Heuzey (1870). Uhle (1922b, p. 112) has made an attempt to classify the cultures of the area and has published a chronology for them. He finds a Maya period, a Tiahuanaco-influenced era, two post-Tiahuanaco periods and the Incaic wave. His descriptions are very limited and unsatisfactory. No proof of any kind is brought in support of his views. Duran (1938a) follows Uhle in this classification. Obviously only stratigraphic excavation will clarify the relations i existing between the different Azuay cultures. Uhle has reported finding what he calls his "Mayoid" culture throughout Canar, Azuay, and Loja. In our survey we were quite interested in this distribution, and although frequently we were unable to find what we now call the Early Narrio horizon, it was possible to confirm its presence at the confluence of the Rircay and Saraguro rivers in southernmost Azuay. So far as our survey is concerned this is also its southernmost authenticated extension in Ecuador. At the confluence of the Rircay and Saraguro rivers, at an elevation of about 800 meters, there is a large hacienda called Sumay Pamba, belonging to the Arias family. Numerous remains have repeatedly attracted attention and sites by that name have been described and illustrated by Verneau and Rivet (1912, pp. 106-113) and Uhle (1923c, Maps 8, 9, and 10). By comparing the data discussed by them, one can see that they refer to two different ruins at Sumay Pamba. A third site was located by our party. For purposes of clarification we are presenting a map (Fig. 3) show- ing the geographic relation between Sumay Pamba A, described by Rivet; B, mapped by Uhle; and C, visited by us. The first two sites are large stone-walled enclosures which Rivet and Uhle believe to be Incaic. Discussion of a similar site in the Catamayo Valley can be found on page 34. 30 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR Sumay Pamba C, examined by us, consists of a buried stone structure and sherd areas on the bluff above the river confluence. The sherds there showed close affinity with Narrio Red-on-Buff wares (PL 11, Figs. 1 and 3; cf. Chapter II). There were some Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine sherds, and some Narrio Gross. Canar Polished bowls with ring bases were also present. The general impression is one of close similarity to Narrio wares. Intrusive M N 0 500 1000 *r METERS y \0 $y~ J**SsK^ c 7 A v° .▲. \o \° B IP /© )«*> >P (Q )*< Fig. 3. Map showing archaeological sites at Sumay Pamba. wares of northern provenience found in late horizons at Cerro Narrio are absent here. There is no evidence of Incaic influence. Some of the ceramics at this site were different from those farther north. Thus, shallow bowls with rows of large punctates on the outside of the rim, polished red slip and white paint are occasionally found (PI. 11, Figs. 5-6). Other bowls are red-slipped and decorated with applique quartered bumps (PI. 11, Fig. 2), while a third type of red-slipped bowl with very straight rim is highly polished. Some engraved sherds are also found. The outside is gray and polished, with parallel grooves and rows of bullet-shaped punctates (PI. 11, Fig. 4). Loja Province Beyond the Jubones we continued our survey into Loja Province, which is virtually terra incognita archaeologically. Different occupations have been reported, particularly by Uhle, but these THE SURVEY 31 have not been substantiated by evidence. In pre-Incaic times, the Palta Indians, of Jivaro and therefore of presumed Arawak affilia- tion, occupied the area (Verneau and Rivet, 1912, pp. 36-39, 113-115; Jijon, 1919b, pp. 380-392). Certain ceramics, to be dis- cussed below, have been identified with the Palta occupation. On the whole, however, information of archaeological nature about the group is minimal. Of the different other occupations postulated for this southern-^ most Ecuadorean province, the "Mayoid" would be the earliest J (Uhle, 1922c). In our survey we found no evidence for this con- > tention, either in the sites we visited in Canton Saraguro or in the Catamayo Valley. A site which Uhle dug near the city of Loja was visited and the original pits were found. Even the laborers used by the German investigator were located. There was no evidence of Red-on-Buff ceramics whatever, and the peones could not remember finding anything beyond a figurine, which is probably the one figured by Uhle (1935, fig. 3). The sherds jiLthe area are coarse and nondescript. In a large collection in the city of Loja belonging to the late Father Lequerica, there were three or four tiny sherds which might have been "Mayoid," but the bulk was peculiar to the area. This, of course, does not preclude the possibility of eventual location of these Canar-Azuay wares in Loja, although we found none. Proto-Panzaleo II, an early culture of north and central Ecuador, is also represented in Loja, according to Uhle (1927a, p. Ill) and Jijon (1930, pp. 141-142, pis. 17, fig. 1; 19, fig. 2). Similarly, the Tuncahuan period, allegedly represented over most of Ecuador, is also found in Loja (Jijon, 1927, vol. 1, p. 91; and 1930, p. 179, fig. 26 [2]). Another occupation postulated for the area is Tia- huanaco. Jijon (1927, vol. 1, p. 134) feels that Loja was the province in Ecuador which showed strongest Tiahuanaco influence, while Uhle claims that figurines of an "Epigonal" character have been found in Loja (Uhle, 1920b, p. 52, note). The evidence for these statements has never been discussed or published. If we accept Tiahuanaco influence in some of the gold objects from Azuay (Means, 1931, pp. 162-167) it is quite probable that it came by way of Loja. Unfortunately, so far nothing concrete has been shown to come from that province that could be definitely labeled Tiahuanaco. CARAPALI Our survey party visited several sites in the Saraguro area on the properties of Messrs. Arias and Burneo. At several points 32 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR called Ayaloma and Llunlli, above the Carapali hacienda at an elevation of 2,700 meters, there was abundant evidence of aboriginal occupation. The tops of hills were terraced and the ceramics were of a coarse, undecorated type. Only this utilitarian ware was found. The dominant forms are wide-mouthed jars and com- poteras, the feet of which show an occasional touch of red slip. The ware is coarsely tempered and dull orange in color. CHILPAS The same ware was found in abundance at a ridge called Chilpas (elevation 3,200 meters), midway between Hacienda Seucer and Hacienda San Jose\ There it was sparingly mixed with Incaic forms and the tempering was less coarse than that of the ware found at Carapali. More vessels show evidence of painting, particularly on rims, and one bowl has alternate bands of red and white on the outside. Shallow compoteras with perpendicular walls and a single perforation in the foot are frequent, as are coarse bowls with similarly straight walls. Tripod vessels and wide-mouthed jars with slightly flaring rims, all coarse and poorly smoothed, are also frequent. A multicameral structure with stone walls of Incaic construction is located on top of the ridge. GUANDO A large site which was probably inhabited by the same people is located at Guando, a high ridge (elevation 3,400 meters) about 15 km. south of Hacienda Uduzhi. Here the northern and southern approaches to a flat ridge top are terraced, and some of the terraces are faced with stone. The terraces are 1.5 to 3 meters high. Ceramic material is very abundant and forms a mound in one spot at the center of the ridge. The sherds are piled up very densely and form a deposit 1.5 meters deep and 5 meters in diameter. Several smaller trash-pits were also found. The ceramics here follow the pattern found in the area. The ware is utilitarian and crude. Only a few vessels are slipped or polished. Mica temper which could be seen at Chilpas is more frequent here. Shallow and flat-topped compoteras are in evidence. As at Chilpas, the feet of the compoteras have a single perforation just below the bowl (PI. 11, Fig. 8). Perforated feet are common in central Ecuador, but vessels from that area usually have three windows cut into the clay. Tripod bowls, crude shallow dishes and other utilitarian shapes are frequent. A ring-based bowl and a scalloped rim were peculiar to Guando, as was the evidence of THE SURVEY 33 /fabric impression_on the inside of bowls (PI. 11, Fig. 7). This two- strand, plain twined pattern is the only fabric impression reported for Ecuador. The fragments on which it occurs are in no way dif- ferent from typical Saraguro wares in other respects. CATAMAYO VALLEY After an unsuccessful search for "Mayoid" sites around the city of Loja, and because of our inability to proceed to the Peruvian border on account of the conflict then going on, we descended into the Catamayo Valley, which is west of Loja. The Catamayo Valley is much lower (elevation about 750 meters) than the surrounding highlands. It is a dry, hot area, with tropical vegetation near the river and arid wastelands beyond. Its importance lies in the fact that the Catamayo becomes the Chira River which flows southwest and empties into the Pacific well down on the north coast of Peru. Eventual tie-ups with that coast would be of considerable interest. Trapichillo is located two kilometers west of La Toma. It was an area of dense aboriginal occupation as shown by the numerous remains spread over a large area. The most typical pottery for the area is a coarse utilitarian ware, orajige jn_cpk>r, with irregular appli- que" rims, some straight and some flaring (PI. 12, Figs. 1-2). This pottery is barely smoothed, showing no evidence that it was polished or slipped. Bowls, jars with flaring rims, and tripods are present. A different ware, somewhat coarser than the preceding, uses applique" bands of clay just below the rim on the exterior of vessels. These bands, 1.3 to 2.2 cm. in width, sometimes parallel the rims; in others they zigzag on the neck. The bands are decorated with double rows of reed punctates (PL 12, Figs. 3-5). In one case the applique" band undulates in wide loops, suggesting a snake. It, too, shows a double punched line (PI. 12, Fig. 6). The third common ware is thinner and finer than the others. It is not slipped, is orange in color and well smoothed. The shapes for the most part are bowls, and jars with flaring rims. The outside, below the rim, is decorated with painted lines running vertically or horizontally, and sometimes crisscrossing each other (PL 12, Figs. 7-10). Their color varies from purple through maroon almost to black. In a few cases there is a narrow band of purple festoons painted on the inside of the bowl just below the rim. These wares are also abundantly represented in the Lequerica Collection already mentioned. They are presumably from the 34 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR Province of Loja, though not necessarily from Trapichillo. Sr. Jijon y Caamafio has indicated in a private communication that he believes the sherds to be of Palta manufacture. Another site in the same valley, located six kilometers south of La Toma on the property of Dr. Jose Maria Eguiguren, is known as Valle Hermoso. The sherds there were few and nondescriptly utilitarian. A large stone- walled structure, 650 meters long by about 500 meters wide, is also located on the property. It is very similar to structures mentioned in the Jubones Valley (p. 29). The outside wall, paralleling the road, is about one meterjugh, and the cross walls, which divide the whole enclosure into long, narrow stalls, barely protrude above the surface. Verneau and Rivet (1912, p. 112) suggest that such structures could have been used for ware- houses or barracks by the Incas. If they had been used in this way, the walls would be considerably higher, or if they had fallen, the ground would be full of rubble. Such is not the case. Uhle (1923c, p. 12) thinks that they were irrigated fields. Whatever their use, the builders of the enclosures are not certain to have been the Incas. No ceramic evidence of Inca occupation was found. The senior author of this report has seen somewhat similar walled enclosures on the north and central coast of Peru, particularly in the Casma Valley, where they are pre-Inca, though definitely late. A visit to the oft-mentioned Lequerica, Collection was not as fruitful as it might have been, because of the loss of the collector's catalogue. Father Lequerica died a few years ago, after accumulat- ing a large collection from the area. Each item was recorded and catalogued, but unfortunately the heirs misplaced the records. Therefore we were unable to consider a group of vessels of Late Chimu type, because their exact provenience was unknown. Had they been found at Loja, the importance of this collection would have been great. As mentioned earlier, there were a few sherds in the collection which tied up with the Canar area. The presence of engraved and polished fragments suggests a late intrusion from the north. We are not sure that these sherds came from Loja. One interesting sherd is reddish and shows grooving or incising with a wide and rounded tool, besides some punctates. Such "pressed out" decoration is extremely rare at Narrio but appears to be frequent in the north Peruvian highlands. II. CERRO NARRIO Introduction In familiarizing ourselves with the literature on Ecuadorean archaeology there was one site that kept reappearing in both Uhle's and Jijon's writing. Concrete data were few, but the value of the site in theoretical consideration appeared to be great. It was one of the most important "Mayoid" sites in the Cuenca-Canar region and it was said to be the type site for a later, derived civilization — that of the "clay seats." Here and there hints were dropped about connections with Tuncahuan horizons to the north and Tiahuanaco to the south. Its name, Cerro Narrio, appears in text or footnotes in every article dealing witlfEcuadorean prehistory published after _ 1922. The large collection of Narrio ceramics at the Colegio Benigno Malo in Cuenca convinced us that the significance of the site had not been exaggerated. Contact was made with Sr. Ezequiel Clavijo of Cafiar, who had sold the above collection to the colegio. Sr. Clavijo had been active for the past twenty-five years in the Cafiar region, deriving a fair income from his devotion to treasure-hunting. Cerro Narrio, a steep-sided hill approximately 100 meters high, is 700 meters west of and across the Rio Quillohuac from the town of Cafiar, at an elevation of 3,100 meters (PI. 13, upper; Maps 2 and 3). A desolate place, virtually without any vegetation, it attracted Sr. Clavijo as early as 1914, because of the abundance of potsherds and other evidence of aboriginal occupation. Through the years he dug here and there, occasionally being rewarded for his efforts with a whole pot, a row of beads, or other Indian trinkets, the market for which was always steady in Cuenca. In January, 1922, this idyllic picture was blasted wide open. A local boy, Pepe Are>alo, found some gold objects while playing on the hill. What happened next is best described by Max Uhle (1922 f): All Cafiar is extremely excited by the finds made some time early last week. Digging folk have invaded Narrio hill and their numbers are growing every day. They consider themselves masters of the situation and no pro- vincial force available could dislodge them, if you remember their naturally obdurate character. Saturday there were perhaps two hundred persons working on the hill; yesterday and today there were four hundred or so. An even larger mob hung around curiously watching the proceeding. Five tents have so far been installed. Many people work day and night; the dawn finds them digging, and they live, eat and sleep on the hill. From far or 35 36 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR near, Narrio reminds you of an ant hill with expeditions going forth in all directions to investigate the neighboring area. The road to the hill is full of working ants — food vendors, spectators, and diggers going back with or without loot. The digging folk are getting nobler; lawyers and society people are forming excavating companies. Recently a new company with ample resources was formed, mostly made up of lawyers, 32 in all, ready to go into action any minute now. Other companies are formed constantly on the hill itself. The whole surface has already been parcelled out and the end of this madness cannot yet be seen. And here are the facts. Occasionally gold has been found and is still being found. It is rarely solid gold. Most of the time copper shines brilliantly and blinds the masses. It is very doubtful if even two pounds of gold were recovered. ' The finds did not improve as time went by, and in 1941 only three men kept the faith and continued digging. Clavijo had meanwhile accumulated a large collection of pottery and other artifacts which he sold in 1940 to the colegio in Cuenca. The hill showed the signs of these efforts. A heavy, crunching carpet of Red-on-Buff sherds covered its lower reaches and upper platform. Large holes and yawning caves, only half filled by wind and rain, were everywhere, and in places the contours of the hill had been considerably altered (PI. 13, lower; PI. 14). It seemed as if every- thing had been disturbed and no place was available for excavation. But the remarkable quality and wide variety of our surface collec- tions, as well as the assurance of Uhle that the site was stratified, indicated that a concerted effort should be made to find undisturbed spots where the "Mayoid" cultures could be dug for and studied. Excavations Eventually we stayed in Canar a month, and with a crew of eight laborers sank sixteen trenches and test pits on various parts of the hill (Map 3). These trenches varied from 1 by 1 to 4 by 12 meters and they usually were more than 2 meters deep, some going even beyond 3 meters. Interest in treasure-hunting was still suffi- cient in Canar to make it necessary to guard our excavations at night to prevent looting. An excavation technique was employed that was adapted to such a disturbed site. Frequently, separating walls were left stand- ing between the holes dug by treasure hunters. Such land-bridges 1 Uhle was present at the height of these activities and observed the treasure hunters at work. He acquired pottery and objects of metal from the diggers, and this is the material he has reported on. He did not carry out systematic excavations at Cerro Narrio. VA £■ %, %K :\ iHt Libhfchl OF THE VALLE DE CANAR ij^js*; lower edges 01 hills -...: higher hills 0 100 Z50 500 —r-—- — ~~^^ ■ . • •• .• : ■ ■ ■ • ■ wr^ ' %. ; ^W*** y.:}::'y^9S!giitia0 MAP 2. MAP OF CANAK VALLEY P pit \ # postholes \ limit of excavation ^ \ MMMMffT METERS Fig. 4. Plan of north section of Trench 1, Cerro Narrio. 37 38 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR represented perfect testing grounds, and after preliminary clearing to see any possible natural strata in the soil or any evidence of disturbance, these were stratigraphically excavated. In such cases the vertical cutting method was used, with objects and sherds from every level carefully separated. Where pits had to be sunk, the levels were always 15 cm. thick, while in cases where natural strati- fication could be seen before digging, excavation followed natural lines, returning to artificial 15 cm. levels only when no strata could be discerned. The trenches on the top platform of Cerro Narrio, Nos. 6-10, were shallower than the rest. This proved significant, as later analysis showed that this part of the hill was inhabited only during the later period of occupancy. Apparently the whole hill had been occupied at one time or an- other, and houses were located in trenches 1, 3, 4, and 6. On the whole, however, there seems to be some discrepancy between the number of houses and the immense quantity of ceramic material found. Uhle has suggested that parts of the hill were used only for ceremonial purposes. It has also been suggested that this pottery was used as grave goods by a people attaching considerable impor- tance to seeing that their dead went to the other world fully equipped with ceramic utensils. Be this as it may, the hill gives the impression of a gigantic ceramic trash heap, and 33,434 sherds whose provenience was certain were recovered, not counting several thousand sherds picked up on the surface because some special feature of shape, texture, or finish had caught the eye of the investigator. The trenching and test pitting were done in an attempt to cover methodically the different parts of the hill. Trench 1 was 10 meters long and 2 wide. It was sunk in the lower reaches on the west side of the hill in a relatively undisturbed area. The levels were all 15 cm. thick, and the trench was 2.20 meters deep. Five burials, flexed and apparently in sitting position, were uncovered. Four of these burials contained no grave goods, and the fifth, which probably contained copper objects, was robbed during the night, before guards had been posted. These burials were covered with piles of boulders. The northern part of the trench con- tained charred maize in level 9, and a pit and postholes cut into the hardpan at a depth of 1.80 meters (Fig. 4; PI. 15, upper). A 6-meter profile (Fig. 5) was drawn on the east side of the trench and a 1 by 1 meter test pit sunk in an apparently undisturbed El. of Confoi C I /'"" • • • •"■- • OUHMWTI « V®* . ... (A CERRO NARRIO 39 area of this face, in order to check through vertical cutting the results achieved through horizontal excavation. Trench 2 (2 by 2 meters) was on the east side of the hill. Hardpan was reached at a depth of 60 cm. But for some intrusive engraved sherds, little was recovered from this trench. Trenches 3 and U were sunk in a terrace on the east shoulder of the hill. Originally 2 meters square, these trenches were enlarged to follow out posthole structures which were uncovered. surfoce soil light brown soil dark brown loam white, lumpy earth 0 25 50 light brown soil brown soil dark soil too yellow sandy soil dark brown fill orange hardpan red hardpan (burned) CENTIMETERS Fig. 5. Vertical section of east wall of Trench 1, Cerro Narrio. Trench 3 was begun as a pit 2 meters square and cut down in 15 cm. levels. Postholes were found in the fill at a depth of 50 cm. The trench was then enlarged to follow out the postholes, revealing a rectangular posthole structure measuring 4 by 4 meters in the north end of the trench (Fig. 6), and a profusion of small, shallow postholes in no discernible order in a southern extension of the trench. The original 2-meter square was then cut down in 15 cm. levels until hardpan was reached at a depth of 2.45 meters. In level 7 an alignment of rocks was uncovered. Below these were three adult burials. The bodies were tightly flexed, two lying on the right side and one on the face. There were no artifacts asso- ciated with these burials. Trench 1+, on the terrace to the northeast of Trench 3, was like- wise begun as a pit 2 meters square. At the bottom of 60 cm. of • postholes /////. test section limit of excavation • • \ \ \ \ • * \ • \ H M l-l l-l l-l I- \ • \ \ \ \ \ \ ? \ Fig. 6. Plan of Trench 3, Cerro Narrio, showing postholes of Late house. 40 • pestholes h hearth lined with stones 7/////, test section limit of excavation Fig. 7. Plan of Trench 4, Cerro Narrio, showing postholes of Late house. 41 42 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR fill rich in coarse, thick sherds, four postholes were found in a line parallel to the direction of the terrace. The line of these holes was followed by means of a narrow trench, revealing a rectangular struc- ture 4 by 11 meters, with rounded corners on the inner side of the terrace (Fig. 7). The fill inside the structure was then removed. Next the whole structure was cut down 25 cm. in two levels in an attempt to find a floor. Sections of well-packed floor were found at the bottom of the second level but did not extend over the whole structure. At this level there was much ash, evidence of charred, matted paja, and a well-made stone-lined hearth (PL 15, lower). The postholes extended from 15 to 25 cm. below this level. The original 2-meter square, enlarged to 2 by 4 meters, was then cut down in 15 cm. levels until hardpan was reached at a depth of 2.50 meters. Six small postholes in a line parallel to the terrace were found cut into the hardpan. Trench 5 was on the west slope of the hill; 2 meters wide, 1.10 meters deep, it was abandoned after one meter of excavation be- cause of the poor sherd yield. Trench 6 was on the top platform of Cerro Narrio, one of the most pitted places on the hill. Huge holes, 10 meters and more in diameter, had been sunk by the treasure hunters, and folklore had it that some were from 7 to 10 meters deep. Many boulders studded the place and the local people claimed that "walls" were to be found everywhere. It was decided to investigate this claim and to see what new data could be obtained about ceramics. A rectangular structure of boulders and some postholes were found, evidently a room in a large multicameral structure (PL 14, lower). Unfortunately this was impossible to follow out because of the pitting. Even the walls of this one room had been bitten into twice (Fig. 8). Several test pits were sunk inside and outside the structure. Another posthole wall was found lower down, in the hardpan at 1.60 meters (Fig. 9), but could not be followed out because of the coming of the rainy season, which made impossible the removal of the large amount of overburden. Trench 7 was dug near Trench 6 in an attempt to check the data from the latter. A combination of natural and artificial levels was used, and the trench was carried to a depth of 1.25 meters. Trench 8 had some very clearly delimited natural levels, though it also showed mostly evidence of a later occupation. It was 1.45 meters deep. / n a it t> o^ ^ tW SP c^\axS I Q^Qkj w '---/ '~o< 9 postholes Q^) stones IH^I modern pits limits of excovation Fig. 8. Plan showing postholes and stones of upper house in Trench 6, Cerro Narrio. Superimposed transparent sheet shows stones which lay immediately above postholes. 43 4-' EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR fill rich in coarse, thick sherds, four posthdles were found in a line parallel to the direction of the terrace. The line of these holes was followed by means^f a narrow trench, revealing a rectangular struc- ture 4 by 11 ;^^^^pivith rounded corners -on the inner side of the terrace (Fig. ||||g||pe fill inside-the structure was then removed. Next the "w^^^stfucture was cut down\ 25 cm. in two levels in an attenipt torfind a founl u^ections of-, well-packed floor were the bo^toftj,^ t$ie seconcb Igvel but\xUd- fiot ektend over s^ructfrre. J^At this level there $as (mftcfeFasm evidence atted^fe, and^ well-madejS^-foedEJarth (PI. 15, poath^le^Q^teAd^^OWft) ft) 25 cm. below^his level. ^€imarged to 2 wy 4 meters; was then cut ifpardpan wa^^^ied at a depth of 2.50 les in a linej|pi||pl to the ^errace were as on tr^^vest st] the Ware'* Tar|io, one of the most ore in diameter, had it that some t^ Local people claimed fhgf^UJ w>^' ^ided to at new data ce^jld be obtained cr^ cause of;^p||poor sher^ Trench tfjvas"6n the x< pitted plajipQn the hillV-1 had beenjpik by the tr€ were fr6jff|f to 10 meters/ Many^oulqers studd< that "jdpfs" were to be0 investfgprte this , .". , ill. LEVELS TRENCH 16 LEVELS TRENCH 4M fW*«* 90- A B0- /\ f . vf/ 70- i? / f / 50- / 40- / 30- E0- ': i \ '•.« 10- J^\. Z3*> 0-i f^ \ ?^**/ — 1 1 1 1^"^ fijir,.,--l >, i i "^ TRENCH lN LEVELS TRENCH 15 Fig. 16. Percentage distribution by trench level of Cerro Narrio wares. These graphs are based on the tables in Appendix B. For the sake of readability only the curves for the four basic wares at Cerro Narrio (Narrio Red-on-Buff, Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine, Caiiar Polished, and Narrio Gross) are shown. Note that the critical point at which the rising curve of Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine in- tersects the falling curve of Narrio Gross in each case falls between levels 3 and 4. Narrio Red-on-Buff reaches its maximum at about the same point and thereafter decreases, while Canar Polished is at its maximum near the bottom of each trench and fades out near the critical point. This critical point may be taken as the divi- sion between the Early and Late periods. tinuity from early to late, which makes us feel that only one people has occupied this area and that the changes described are due to the normal cultural development of an aboriginal group. Thus, Narrio Red-on-Buff ceramics are found throughout the different trench levels, and while certain new forms and decorative motifs 79 80 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR appear in this ware in later times, the basic ceramic component remains virtually unchanged. We have given the names of Early and Late Cerro Narrio to the two complexes found on that hill. There is no doubt of their temporal relationship. While the Late period is not isolated by a sterile layer from the Early one, it is made up of ceramic forms, No rn'o R-on-B a> c a> a> L -a o 2 2 CD .n CO => P 1 1/1 c/» ±- 2: £ — < £ c c ?o* a 2 — — C£0-w~_ox c rn'o nar rian nsta rian rn'o )Up rthe D OOOOOOw-O ZO>0>202 - Inca , ^ Horizon Late , , Period _._ .__ -- — — — Early Period Constant except for late jar and bowl forms Fig. 17. Schematic representation of Narrio ceramic chronology. artifacts and other cultural evidence of peculiar cast which were found consistently in the sixteen trenches, where the two horizons are clearly stratified. The stratigraphic relationships of the Early and Late ceramic types are shown in Figures 16 and 17 (cf. also Appen- dix B). It was not a sudden invasion or a break-up of the old culture that we are witnessing in the valley, but rather a gradual change of the culture patterns. Ceramic forms grew rougher, there was less evidence of contact with the sea, metals appeared, there was contact and probably trade with at least two new and different cul- tural centers. At the end of the Late period it appears that the Inca conquest terminated the occupation of Cerro Narrio. PREHISTORY OF CANAR VALLEY 81 Below are listed the known cultural traits comprising the Early and Late complexes at Cerro Narrio. Revision and particularly amplification of the Early complex will obviously be needed before the prehistory of this area can be clearly understood. Early Complex Ceramics Narrio Red-on-Buff (pp. 46-49). Variants A, B and C (pp. 49-50). Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine (pp. 50-52). Canar Polished (pp. 53-54). Granulated ware (p. 54). Anthropomorphic designs; depression with applique clay pellet for eye. Artifacts Stone (pp. 67-68). Ground knives, pottery-smoothers, beads, flat carved pendants, figurines. Bone (pp. 68-69). Awls of deer long bones, worked deer scapulae, use of deer antler for tools (presence of deer and rabbit bones indicates use of these animals for food; no evidence found of llama or guinea pig). Shell (p. 69). Pendants and beads of marine and fresh-water shells, probably spon- dylus shell figurines, large land-snail shells with engraved spiral design, possible use of land snails for food. Clay (p. 70). Pottery-smoothers and spindle whorls made from sherds, one mini- ature ax head of clay found. Metal No evidence of use of metal; probably little used. Houses (pp. 70-72). Vertical pole structures of undetermined shape. Burials No evidence found. Agriculture Maize; probably other crops, though no direct evidence found. Late Complex Ceramics Narrio Red-on-Buff, continued (pp. 46-49). Variant D. Narrio Gross (pp. 54-56); "Coffee-bean" eye. Intrusive. Group X (pp. 58-62). Red Engraved. Black Engraved. Glossy Red Engraved. 82 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR Quartz-Studded. Red Banded Incised. ' Northern group (pp. 62-66). Puruha (San Sebastian, Elen Pata, Huavalac). Tuncahuan. Variants A, B, C, D, E and F. Artifacts Stone (pp. 67-68). One chipped projectile point, celts, perforated ax heads, spindle whorls, atlatl spurs, beads. Bone (pp. 68-69). Awls, needles, bodkins, spatula, small polished rods, notched sticks, whistles, rings, fragments of worked scapulae, brocket deer antler points, sting-ray spines, use of llama and deer. Shell (p. 69). No shell artifacts (apparent decrease of contacts with sea). Land snail shells used as grave goods. Clay (p. 70). Flat gross figurines, vessel fragments used as pottery-smoothers and as spindle whorls. Drums or seats. Metal (pp. 69-70). Copper axes and topus. Gold ornaments and gilded copper appar- ently introduced in this period. Houses (pp. 70-72). Pole houses, ellipsoid or rectangular in form, with thatched roofs of coarse grass. In very late times and possibly only for special purposes house poles were reinforced with stones. Burials (pp. 72-73). Flexed, apparently sitting. Covered with boulders. Grave goods frequent; include artifacts, ornaments, land snail shells. Agriculture Maize and other crops (?; no evidence found); manioc imported (?). The picture presented above is confirmed by additional survey and excavation at Quillohuac, Shillu and Cashaloma. Shillu, through its lack of Red-on-Buff Fine pottery and because of the presence of Red-on-Buff Late forms and of intrusive wares of Group X, can be dated as Late Cerro Narrio. The absence of intrusive Northern wares is in accord with the physical evidence of shallow, short occupation. It confirms the evidence that the two different outside influences during Late Cerro Narrio came at different times, with only the earlier affecting the people of Shillu. Cashaloma, while basically of Cerro Narrio type, is considerably later than Shillu. The dominant outside influence here is the Incaic, reflected both by typical Cuzco forms and native vessels showing the southern empire's influence. Thereby the sequence PREHISTORY OF CANAR VALLEY 83 established at Narrio is extended into the fifteenth century, con- firming simultaneously the possibility of Incaic influences at Narrio proper, which were none too certain. The temporal relations of the sites in Canar Valley are shown in Figure 18. Early Cerro Narrio ties up with the different "Mayoid" sites in Azuay listed by Uhle (1922c, pp. 206-207), of which Chaulla- bamba, Carmen and Huancarcuchu seem the most important.1 In this article he unfortunately discusses pottery and artifacts without Inca Narrio Shillu Cashaloma Horizon Loie Period Early Period Fig. 18. Chronological positions of sites in Canar Valley. regard for provenience. It is impossible to tell where the majority of forms came from. But it is clear that these sites share Narrio Red-on-Buff and Red-on-Buff Fine pottery, line luster and bulbous decoration, and some forms of Canar Polished, as well as certain characteristic shell and stone figurines and ornaments. Some of the unique sherds from Early levels at Cerro Narrio (Pis. 42-43) show similarities to coastal forms, but the latter are still insufficiently known for definite commitment. In later times, the associations to the south become less marked. It is very possible that similarity will become apparent when a stratigraphic excavation is undertaken, with due attention to statisti- cal frequencies. There is little in common between Late* Cerro Narrio and the more spectacular forms discussed in the Survey (p. 28) as being late on the headwaters of the Santiago in Azuay. 1 Uhle has proposed the term "Mayoid" for the Early Cerro Narrio complex (1922c, 1928b, 1935), while Jijon (1930) prefers to call it Chaullabamba. 84 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR To the north, the earliest influence within the Late period at Narrio (Group X) has also affected the Chanchan and Upano valleys. This influence, reflected at Alausi through Engraved, Red Banded Incised, Quartz-Studded and White-on-Red wares and at Macas through the latter three only, has not yet been traced to its focal point. The evidence is clear that Group X is just as much intrusive at Alausi as it is at Narrio, and this is probably true at Macas also. The group does not seem to be found in the northern , highlands, which are fairly well known. Because of resemblance to Quartz-Studded vessels from Huigra and Esmeraldas and black engraved pottery from Manabi, Group X may have come from the coast. The geographic position of Macas suggests the Oriente jungles as another possible point of origin. The evidence seems to favor most the coastal side, but an adequate answer will require additional investigation. Shortly after Group X, Puruha influences began to be felt at Narrio. This wave connects not only three diverse Puruha periods (San Sebastian or Guano, Elen Pata and Huavalac) but also allegedly earlier Tuncahuan levels with the latest occupation at Cerro Narrio. While not very strong, this influence cross-dates the Canar Valley with aboriginal cultures of the Chimborazo Province and tends to alter the succession proposed for them (Jijon, 1927, 1930) by tele- scoping several periods. Finally, this late dating of some northern forms is confirmed by finds made at Joyaczhi, high up in the Nudo del Azuay. There several variants of Tuncahuan (Jijon, 1930, pi. 25) are found along 1 with sherds decorated with Incaic-influenced Cashaloma reed-punc- tates (Jijon Collection). There seems little doubt that in the period just preceding the Inca conquest the Puruha people were increasing their sphere of influence to the south. In the Late period, as in the Early levels, contacts with the littoral are hinted at by the presence of a few intrusive sherds of coastal cast, but the data are insufficient for a definite statement. There remains the problem of identification of the different periods discussed above with aboriginal tribes inhabiting the area in historic times. There seems to be little doubt that the Canari people lived on the upper reaches of the Naranjal before, during and after the Incaic conquest. Incaic artifacts and evidence of Incaic influences are found in direct association with a Late Cerro Narrio complex at Cashaloma and probably at Narrio. As no other ethnic group besides the Canari has been reported for the area, we are bound PREHISTORY OF CANAR VALLEY 85 to conclude that Cerro Narrio ceramics and artifacts were manu- factured and used by Canari Indians. If this be true, Early Cerro Narrio represents the cultural equipment with which the Cafiaris moved into the area. Where they came from is unknown at present. Even discounting Uhle's Totonac-Chosotegan-Panamanean hypoth- esis (1931), it is still logically possible that the group represented by our pottery came from the Ecuador coast, although there is no evidence to prove this. They spread through the provinces of Azuay and Canar, the different units eventually pursuing their individual lines of development in comparative isolation. From the survey evidence it seems that the area around Cuenca and the upper reaches of Rio Santiago was a center of Canari development from the early Cerro Narrio or Chaullabamba base. As stated in the Survey (p. 27), this later development, consistent in itself, differs from a chronologically similar horizon across the range in the Canar Valley. Isolation of the two areas from each other, and diverse outside contacts, with southern and perhaps eastern influences in Azuay, would account for this diversification. Thus, the late differences between Canar and Azuay are not necessarily an argu- ment against our tentative equation of Early and Late Cerro Narrio with the Canari Indians. V. CONCLUSIONS Our survey and excavations in southern Ecuador have produced the following results. We have established a stratigraphic chronology for the Canar Valley. At its upper end this chronology is tied in with the Inca horizon, thus giving it a terminal date of 1450-1500. The early part of the chronology can be extended into the Province of Azuay to the south on the basis of similar ceramics found there, and through the presence of intrusive wares it is possible to relate the Canar sequence to the aboriginal remains in Chimborazo, the next province to the north. We are unable to see in Canar ceramics the close resemblances to Central America which have been em- phasized by Uhle and Jijon, and which first attracted us to Cerro Narrio. Rather, we are inclined to identify the Canar remains with the Canari Indians, who are known to have occupied the region at the time of the Inca conquest. Although vessels of apparent north Peruvian coastal provenience occur sporadically in southern Ecuador, Peruvian influence is not evident in the local ceramics. The Canar Valley chronology consists of an early period (Early Cerro Narrio), a late period (Late Cerro Narrio), and a final Inca horizon. The Early and Late period complexes are described in full in Chapter IV. The Early and Late periods were found clearly stratified in the deep refuse deposits at Cerro Narrio. There was no clear break between the two periods but a transition in which early wares faded out and new ones appeared. A basic ware lasted throughout the occupation of Cerro Narrio, showing only minor changes in form and decoration. There is therefore reason to believe that the two periods represent not separate occupations of the hill but the developing culture of a single people, who probably were the Canari Indians. Intrusive in the Late period at Cerro Narrio were found two groups of ceramics. The first (Group X), which we believe to be slightly earlier in time at Cerro Narrio than the second, includes Black Engraved, Red Engraved, Glossy Red Engraved, Quartz- Studded, and Red Banded Incised, as well as White-on-Red. These wares were found consistently in a horizon near the beginning of the Late period. The second and later group includes Puruha wares, typical of the Province of Chimborazo to the north, and Tuncahuan wares, found in Chimborazo and still farther north, all of which were found closely associated in the latest horizon of occupation at the summit of Cerro Narrio. In these intrusive Puruha wares we 86 CONCLUSIONS 87 have identified types which Sr. Jijon has placed in three separate periods, namely, San Sebastian, Elen Pata and Huavalac. That these two intrusive ceramic groups were not contempora- neous was confirmed by our excavations at Shillu. This was a shallow site containing Cerro Narrio wares of Late type associated with Group X intrusives; no Puruha-Tuncahuan intrusives were found. Some Incaic and Inca-influenced vessels have been reported from Cerro Narrio, but we found no clear Inca horizon there. How- ever, at Cashaloma, a site of Late Cerro Narrio period, definite and ample evidence of Inca influence was found in the upper levels. To sum up the situation in the Canar Valley, at Cerro Narrio we have represented an early and a late period, with two groups of northern intrusives in the Late period, and scanty evidence of Inca influence. At Shillu we have a pure Late period site with Group X intrusives only. Cashaloma is a Late period site showing definite Inca influence toward the end of its occupation. Early Cerro Narrio wares have been reported by Uhle for several sites in the Province of Azuay to the south of Canar, and their presence at Sumay Pamba on the Jubones extends the distribution to the northern edge of the Province of Loja. The presence of Late Cerro Narrio wares in Azuay has not been established, although future stratigraphic excavation may well reveal them there. The Late Cerro Narrio sherds at Sumay Pamba make it likely that this period is represented farther north in Azuay also. Certain non-Narrio and presumably late ceramic types in collections from Azuay suggest the possibility that in Azuay in the Late period ceramic development followed a different line from that in the Canar Valley. Group X intrusives are present at Alausi on the western slope in Chimborazo, and at Macas at the eastern foot of the Andes. Group X thus came to the Canar Valley from the north. Too little is known as yet to determine the focus of this influence, and it may ultimately prove to have come either from the coast or the jungle. The former is the more probable place of origin. We found late Puruha pottery at Zula on the upper Chambo and at Alausi. These places are within the area of extension of Puruha already suggested by Sr. Jijon. South of the Rio Jubones in Saraguro our survey revealed no evidence of Cerro Narrio pottery or of other wares typical of Azuay. Saraguro wares are crude and utilitarian, and at present cannot 88 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR be tied up with surrounding areas. There is evidence of an Inca horizon here. Local painted wares were found in the Catamayo Valley west of Loja. These do not affiliate to the north, nor can we at present see much resemblance to known Peruvian types, although more knowledge of the Peruvian highland and coast immediately to the south may make evident some sort of tie-up. Large stone enclosures in the Catamayo Valley are similar to ones on the Jubones reported by Verneau and Uhle as being Incaic. In the former place we found no Incaic sherds. These structures are somewhat suggestive of late stone enclosures on the coast of Peru (e.g., in the Casma Valley). The problem of Central American connections remains unsolved. Southern Ecuador is the area showing clearest Mayoid, Chorotegan and Panamanean connections of any of the Andean cultures, accord- ing to Uhle. We are convinced that these direct connections are not realities and that the concrete similarities, when graphically pre- sented, cannot be confirmed. The difficulty seems to lie in the fact that in all of his comparative work Uhle uses the isolated trait as the comparable unit. Whenever he does engage in concrete examination of data, which is none too frequently, he tends to extract the unique and favorable fact from its context, consistently ignoring the larger pattern (1923a, 1924, 1931). Also, as Lothrop has pointed out (1940, p. 423), he neglects the chronology which has been developed and improved for Middle America. His only attempt to reconcile the calendar of the Mayas with their supposed migrations consists in criticism of Lehman's correlation (1923b), and in suggestions as to the relative antiquity of Maya and Totonac remains. On the other hand, Uhle was right in feeling that Tuncahuan influences in Canar were later than Early Cerro Narrio (his "Mayoid" levels). As has been pointed out, Tuncahuan ceramics are part of the latest outside wave to penetrate the Canar area, shortly before the Incaic conquest. This would seem to throw some doubt on the feeling of Sr. Jijon (1927, vol. 2, p. 182, footnote 2) that Tuncahuan peoples worked and lived in Chimborazo in the period before a.d. 750. The Puruha Indians allegedly entered the area shortly after- wards and were still there when the Cuzco legions marched through. The evidence at Cerro Narrio clearly places Tuncahuan and the various Puruha levels in the same late chronological position. This evidence does not necessarily contradict the temporal differentiation of the Tuncahuan occupation from that of the CONCLUSIONS 89 Puruha in Chimborazo. But it does shrink highland chronology to at most four or five centuries prior to the arrival of the Incas in Ecuador. It supports Means' contention (1931, pp. 157-164) that the different Puruha periods can be telescoped, although his argument in terms of the "Archaic" style is not acceptable today. The occurrence side by side of Elen Pata ceramics dated 850-1300 by Sr. Jijon with Tuncahuan pottery believed to go back to the beginning of the Christian era, raises legitimate doubts as to the validity of the chronology proposed. It is only through additional work that the problems confronting Ecuadorean archaeology will be solved. The systematic survey of the country undertaken by Mr. Edwin N. Ferdon, Jr., for the School of American Research is in that respect an excellent project. Although Mr. Ferdon has as yet been unable to work in the southern highland, this area is included in his future program and should yield important results. The region included in the Azogues-Cuenca-Cumbe-Sigsig-Paute pentagon is the one that demands most immediate survey and excavation. Stratified sites probably exist there, and careful work will check our Canar chronology as well as extend it. The placing of Tiahuanaco influences, suggested by the Chordeleg gold artifacts, into our Cafiari chronology will also be very helpful. Finally, the relation to other Peruvian cultures such as Chavin and Chimu might be cleared up. The same problem can be fruitfully attacked in Loja, with a survey of the Jubones and the Catamayo-Chira drainages indicated as the most pressing project. The Palta occupation of Loja, whose linguistic affiliations are in the Oriental jungle and whose archaeology is virtually unknown, presents the problem of Amazonic influences in Andean development, variously suggested by Rivet and Lothrop but never archaeologically tested. To the north, a survey of the Naranjal and Chanchan drainages might shed light on the origin of the Cerro Narrio complex, and clarify Group X and its affiliations. Finally, the Macas area and if possible the entire Upano Valley should be investigated. The correlation shown there with Alausi and Narrio, through Group X wares, raises again the problem of Amazonic intrusion, already suggested for Loja. Only additional work, however, can remove these relationships from the realm of pure speculation. 90 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR We have mentioned certain evidence of outside cultural in- fluence in the highland of southern Ecuador: evidence of contact with the Ecuadorean coast and the Amazonic jungle, of trade with the north coast of Peru in pre-Incaic times, and of possible Tia- huanaco influence in metal objects from Azuay. Despite the hints of contacts with Peru, Peruvian influences in southern Ecuador appear to have been surprisingly slight. In general, we have the impression that Ecuador affiliates more closely with Colombia than with Peru. Ecuador occupies a strategic position for studying the problem of cultural interchange between the Andean region and Central America. Such traits as certain styles of stone sculpture, methods of constructing tombs, forms of pottery (e.g., tripod vessels), nega- tive painting on pottery, and metallurgical techniques link Ecuador to the south with Peru and to the north with Colombia and Central America. These and other traits held in common by the Andean region and Central America have varying geographical distributions and appear to be of different ages. It is therefore highly improbable that the spread of these traits can be explained satisfactorily in terms of a single cultural wave or a number of closely related cultural waves. It appears at present that the cultural resemblances between South and Central America resulted from diffusion in both directions and over a long period of time. These general considerations, as well as the fact that we cannot see the very specific resemblances claimed, lead us to disagree with Uhle's and Jijon's theories of direct Maya and Chorotegan influence in Ecuador. Apparently there are no short cuts to the solution of the problem of Central American connections with Andean civili- zations. Systematic excavations to establish as fully as possible the patterns of aboriginal life, as well as reliable chronologies, are needed before comparative work can yield decisive results. APPENDIX A: PASTE ANALYSIS OF CERRO NARRIO WARES BY Sharat K. Roy Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine. — The clay consists of a base or ground mass of microcrystalline micaceous substance, probably mont- morillonitic, with a large proportion of pumice particles (temper) showing a moderate degree of rounding. Pale green and brown augite, brown biotite, sodic plagioclase, and quartz grains, make up the rest. Also present are relatively large masses of tuff of lighter color, but otherwise similar character; these may represent an earlier ashfall, which has been washed into the basin of deposition during the settling of the latter. Apparently the clay is obtained from a bed of volcanic debris, not too far from the site of eruption. The recognizable mineral components are quite fresh, and show little alteration by weathering or firing. Narrio Red-on-Buff. — The paste is easily distinguishable from that of Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine. The microcrystalline base is finer-grained, and darker, containing much black or dark brown opaque oxide. No pumice fragments are present, but calcic plagio- clase (temper) is abundant. Particles of fine-grained rhyolite are also numerous. Quartz, green hornblende, green augite, and red- brown biotite are also present. Narrio Gross. — The paste contains considerable quartz (temper) and is more like Red-on-Buff than Red-on-Buff Fine. Canar Polished. — Temper consists of fragments of plagioclase, quartz, rhyolitic ash, green and brown hornblende and augite, red- brown biotite, and some pumice of the type seen in Narrio Red-on- Buff Fine. The matrix is similar to that of Narrio Red-on-Buff. Apparently all the samples are of the same general derivation, volcanic debris. Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine differs from the others in the abundance of pumice fragments, and paucity of plagioclase. Merely from examination of the sections it cannot be said whether the respective samples represent distinct ashfalls, or merely phases of one fall, the differences being due to natural sedimentation proc- esses, or possibly treatment (washing, etc.) by the potter. Probably more than one fall is indicated. 91 APPENDIX B: DISTRIBUTION OF SHERDS BY TRENCH LEVELS AT CERRO NARRIO In tables 1-5 are shown the percentages for each ware in each level for trenches IN, 4M, 15, 16 and 6 (inside house).1 The first four are typical of the trenches dug on the shoulders and lower platforms of Cerro Narrio, while Trench 6 is representative of the trenches dug in the Late deposits on the top platform of the hill. Certain minor types, because of the small number of sherds belong- ing to them, have been grouped together for convenience. Thus Variants A, B and D of Narrio Red-on-Buff have been included with Narrio Red-on-Buff, the intrusive engraved types have been lumped under one heading, and the Puruha and Tuncahuan groups are each listed under their respective names. It should be noted again that we use the term "ware" in a general sense to refer to pottery types and to broader ceramic groupings. Table 1. — Distribution by Level of Sherds in Trench 6 (inside House) Percentage of total sherds in level Wares Lev. 1 Narrio Red-on-Buff 67.7 Narrio Red-on-Buff (Variant C) Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine 3.2 Cariar Polished 3.2 Granulated Narrio Gross 22 . 7 Engraved Puruha 3.2 Tuncahuan Others Lev. 2 Lev. 3 64.9 42.9 6.3 0.9 3.9 24^3 1.8 51.4 0.6 i'.k 0^6 0.6 Lev. 4 Lev. 5 Lev. 41.0 39.0 65. 7.7 51^3 58.2 2^8 34 '. Lev. 7 Total No. 58.9 268 7.7 2.6 20 3 2.6 28.2 224 14 1 7 1 All wares. Total number of sherds 31 111 154 39 141 23 39 538 1 The dimensions of these trenches are as follows: IN is 2 by 3.3 meters, and 1.8 meters deep; 4M is 2 by 4 meters, and 2.5 meters deep; 6 (inside house) is approxi- mately 3 by 6 meters, and 1.6 meters deep; 15 is 1 by 1 meter, and 2.6 meters deep; 16 is 1 by 1 meter, and 2.10 meters deep. 92 -z . CO t- CO ^ O OS C— ■ CO t-h 2 O 00 ■ — i ONt-l-CO -hM OJ2 00 00 CO ^h -^ •3 . OS 00 i-h Tf t- SO rP t}< CO OS So 00 r- I to CO i— I 00 COCO "5|Z oi ►J !OOH ■ ■ ■ t-co . . . •CO - 00 CO O t- t- lO > ►J 00 o CO -* Tt O T-H ■ CO T-H T-H o CO 01 »* as i— < ■* • • 00 > o> ■J cot-h Tjl 00 T-t o ■ •o OS CO CO CO lO a 00 T-H (MOOOOrH • CO t- IO -^ co CO 00 -"# • ■ o > - T-H O lO as os'io co • CO i1-1 CO IO • co as cd co • • • CO > 01 IO • .— i io co co • CO '. rH m ,_ . no co co as t-h • co > CI t- ■ rflOOWH •o rf CO ■ as co • t- os • • o > as ■ lO ■ ■^< io ■ co ^< ■ CO CO CO Tf oo oo -^t1 as go ■ ■ t- > at 00 O IO as io o oo io ■o C4 t-h C- O 00 IO t- ">* -Tj< -# > t- O cd co t-h as o •oo stssc mm i i c c. O Ol t- as • Tf CO ■ c EH PQ o t- co o CV Qj ~Z Qj *h r-r-> < ,2v2 §v2 <^3 o ax cacacrjCH,t_sj£-;3 §5 HO o CO 0- ~ t- ■ r-H CO • ■ J t-h • ioco • 3 t-H ■ 00 2 co • o m • ■ > •>* • T-H CO • jjj t-H • 00 2 Tf co o t> t- o > t-h o t-aioo -^ co co Tf as t- co > as o c~ o t-h o . M CO- 2 toco tjiooco >' CO O hiioioo CI X o OS 00 ic CO t-h O ■ ■ -* os ?i ■"* as o cd as t* ■ ■ o ■>* HH 1-1 CD • ■ z oo co -^c tOTjifO • ^ > ta t-O CJ t£> t-h CO • id Q ii J rH t- « V e t- T* t~ tJHCCOS • •CO CIS IO CO C/J 60 as o C~ t- CO T-H • lO •o 5U -r Ik tl HK o co V. ►H co t~ • OOTfC1) ■ t~ "& os 00 > "e > o 00 ■ -T* 00 T-H CD ■ CD y~{ CO T-J o s 03 "& > T-HO co as t-h co to -r* CO CO •<* O • io oo •oo s ,2: Ct> ►J ■* ■^ e o e o H s= rf 00 td as as -* -«r)< • CO t~ bn -^f 5 PQ *-. > 0i 00 o ■*Wh® ■ Ot-H IO co Tt CO ■ CO o as co o to O t-h t-h io EHtH mm ii i i-^ C^ C ^ C QJ ? ?o ?x oi m c ai — ai BS' >ri O U 3 u ^ go |2*S s „K ^ S fit t< 3 " « C3 03 OJoJthWcSS-i-' 93 3d £^ a - 2 e > lO ■ lO o oorH _ CO ■ rH CO CO ■ 00 U3 ;rj OS • 00 • > rH c CM in O o © — 00 i CM O 3 (M CM CM CO no U0CM hcoo m co oo woo O5 00C0 CM ■<# lO CO COlO SCctl 3 3 mm ??U?| -CT3 ^-C.22-0 a> a e Dr; cu ^i /™\ — i^ TiT r*v f^ ^ cc! "3 . IC CM CO COC5 i wC CM CCt~ ,-Z fr- CO I o ^ in , >~_ in cc! c • "-*>-; id US . can- can- as «-. — o CM 00 CM-rX ■ CO • • ■ • % T ■ CMCM • O ■ h3 ' 00 rH rH OS • couo > 00 • — 'oi • • j CM • CO So- OS OS ■ CM • • • • > t-t ■ CM •<* ■ — ' . ~ rH . oo • oo ■ oo co ■ oo • • • • o CO • OC0 ■ — • J CO ■ CO K OS • t- 00 CO 8 N • OlOO • ■ J -H ■ 00 fc- o ■ O O OO • • ■ • -a m r-l ■ 00 t- — i CO • g ^ CO • lO .... CO •e> » ■<# ■ O rr CM rg 42 £ us • oo-* • gjCO- iCrH ^S cc O •S ia t- iO - "* 00 C- Ht-Nt- • • -oo "5 53 > •• ■« "2 oOO CO CO CM U0 • ■ • O ® g J lO CM r-t ■ . • t, U CO 0* ".CM • CO U0 OS ■ • -rH % CO ■ CO rH - t- • ■ • rH _; CO ■ rH ■ rH . . . N OS ■ rwdcoOSCO -coo % -rl< • OOOOrH • O rH J CO • h CM - CM oo «ecc 3 3 CO 00 ■«* o CQPQ m II I I c a. O Ol 00 ■** -rt< o cac3~ — ' cs co *- ccs c _. 3 — Zr? ZuOZHdnhO M S^ « (J « » C 3 3+! ZZ ZOOZHPhHO 94 BIBLIOGRAPHY In an attempt to compile a complete bibliography on the archaeology of Ecuador we have included, in addition to the works we have consulted and those cited in the text, many publications which we have not seen. The most important specific and general works are marked with an asterisk. Abbreviations AUC Anales de la Universidad Central, Quito, Ecuador BANH Boletin de la Academia Nacional de Historia, Quito, Ecuador BSE Boletin de la Sociedad Ecuatoriana de Estudios Historicos, Quito, Ecuador AMNH Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History, New York FMNH Anthropological Series, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago RCHC Revista de la Sociedad de Historia de Cuenca, Ecuador JSAP Journal de la Societe des Americanistes de Paris Anthony, Raoul, and Rivet, Paul 1908. Recherches anatomiques sur les ossements (os des membres) des abris sous roches de Paltacalo. Bulletins et Memoires de la Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, ser. 5, vol. 9, pp. 314-430. Arriaga, Jesus 1922. Apuntes de arqueologia Canar. Cuenca. Bamps, Anatole 1879. Les antiquites ecuatoriennes du Musee Royal d'Antiquites de Bruxelles. Compte Rendu du Congres des Americanistes, 3rd Session, vol. 2, pp. 47-143, 40 plates. Brussels. 1887. Tomebamba, antique cite de l'empire des Incas. Louvain. 1888. Les antiquites ecuatoriennes du Musee Royal d'Antiquites de Bruxelles. Bulletin de la Societe Royale Beige de Geographie, vol. 12, pp. 121-152, 253-284. Illustrated. Barbarena, Santiago 1893. Origen de las tribus indigenas del Ecuador. Repertorio Salvadoreno, pp. 13-23. San Salvador. Barrera, Isaac J. 1918. El Padre Don Juan de Velasco. BSE, vol. 1, pp. 136-144. 1938. La prehistoria ecuatoriana. Realidades Ecuatorianas, Publicaciones de la Universidad Central, pp. 9-42. Bergsoe, Paul *1937. The metallurgy and technology of gold and platinum among the pre- Columbian Indians. Ingenio'rvidenskabelige Skrifter, No. A44. Copen- hagen. *1938. The gilding process and the metallurgy of copper and lead among the pre-Columbian Indians. Ingeni0rvidenskabelige Skrifter, No. A46. Copen- hagen. Beuchat, H. 1912. Manuel d'archeologie americaine. Paris. 95 96 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR Bollaert, William 1860. Antiquarian, ethnological and other researches in New Granada, Equador, Peru and Chile. London. 1870. On the ancient or fossil pottery found on the shores of Ecuador. Mem- oirs of the Anthropological Society of London, vol. 3, pp. 163-166. Buitron Chaves, Anibal 1942. Reconocimiento arqueologico del alto Ecuador austral. BANH, vol. 22, No. 59, pp. 153-173. Cermak, Kliment 1894. Prahistorische Altertiimer von Ecuador in America. Zeitschrift fur Ethnologie, vol. 26, pp. 470-471. *Cieza de Leon, Pedro de 1553. Parte primera de la chronica del Peru. Seville. Clement, Andre 1932. Note sur la durete des haches pre-colombiennes de l'Equateur et du Mexique. JSAP, n. ser., vol. 24, pp. 85-91. 1935. Contribution a l'etude de la metalurgie pre-colombienne. JSAP, n. ser., vol. 27, pp. 418-458. Cody, Bertha P. 1941. Gold ornaments of Ecuador. Masterkey, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 87-95, 3 figs. Southwest Museum, Los Angeles. Corbett, John M. 1941. A copper mould from Ecuador. El Palacio, vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 34-37. CORDERO PALACIOS, OCTAVIO 1924. El Quichua y el Canari. Cuenca. Crespo Ordonez, Ricardo 1923. Exportation de objetos arqueologicos. *Dorsey, George A. 1901. Archaeological investigations on the island of La Plata. FMNH, vol. 2, No. 5. Duran, Miguel T. 1930. Entierros en Huapan. RCHC, No. 16, pp. 168-176, 2 plates. 1931. La civilization tiahuanaquense en Hatun-Canar. RCHC, No. 18, pp. 190-202; No. 19, pp. 310-319. 1936. Introduction a nuestros estudios arqueologicos. RCHC, No. 26, pp. 99-104. 1937. Dos cartas. RCHC, No. 29, pp. 1-8. 1938a. Cuyes y Jima. RCHC, No. 31, pp. 201-209. 1938b. Las ruinas de Xochicalco y Chimu. RCHC, No. 32, pp. 328-333. Espinosa, Luis Dario 1931. Discurso. RCHC, No. 18, pp. 166-171. Etzelt, Franz 1936. Restos de mamiferos de las tobas pleistocenas de Punin, Ecuador. AUC, No. 298. Farabee, W. C. 1921. A golden hoard from Ecuador. The Museum Journal, vol. 12, pp. 43-52. Philadelphia. BIBLIOGRAPHY 97 Ferdon, Edwin N., Jr. 1940a. Investigacion arqueologica en el Ecuador. BANH, vol. 29, No. 55, pp. 103-108. 1940b. The archaeological survey of Ecuador. El Palacio, vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 137-144. *1 940. Reconnaissance in Esmeraldas. El Palacio, vol. 47, No. 12, pp. 257-274. *1941a. Reconnaissance in Esmeraldas. El Palacio, vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 7-15. *1941b. The excavation at La Libertad. El Palacio, vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 38-42. 1941c. Preliminary notes on artifacts from La Libertad, Ecuador. El Palacio, vol. 48, pp. 204-210. 1942. Excavaciones arqueologicas cerca de la Libertad, provincia de Guayas. BANH, vol. 22, No. 59, pp. 75-81. and Corbett, John Maxwell 1941. Depositos arqueologicos de La Tolita. BANH, vol. 21, No. 57, pp. 5-15. Gonzalez de la Rosa, Manuel 1908. Les Caras de l'Equateur et les premiers resultats de l'expedition G. Heye sous la direction de M. Saville. JSAP, n. ser., vol. 5, pp. 85-93. Gonzalez Suarez, Federico *1878. Estudio historico sobre los Caharis, antiguos habitantes de la provincia del Azuay en la Republica del Ecuador. Quito. *1892. Atlas arqueologico ecuatoriano. Quito. 1904. Prehistoria ecuatoriana. Ligeras reflexiones sobre las razas indigenas que poblaban antiguamente el territorio actual de la Republica del Ecuador. 87 pp., 5 plates. Quito. 1910. Investigaciones arqueologicas sobre los aborigenes del Carchi y de Imbabura. Quito. 1915. Notas arqueologicas. Quito. 1922. See 1878. Second edition published in Cuenca. Grijalva, Carlos E. 1921. Nombres y pueblos de la antigua provincia de Imbabura. BANH, vol. 1, Nos. 3-4, pp. 33-70. 1938. La expedition de Max Uhle a Cuasmal o sea la proto-historia de Imba- bura y Charchi. Quito. Hamy, E. T. 1882. Le tombeau de Tres Molinos, pres Guano. Decades Americanae, Nos. 1-2, pp. 27-28. 1897. Galerie americaine du Musee d'Ethnographie de Trocadero. 50 plates. Paris. Heuzey, M. L. 1870. Le tresor de Cuenca. Gazette des Beaux-Arts, vol. 4. Paris. HUERTA RENDON, FRANCISCO 1940. Una civilization precolombina en Bahia de Caraquez. Revista del Colegio Nacional Vte. Rocafuerte, No. 51, pp. 85-96. Guayaquil. Jijon y Caamano, Jacinto 1912. El tesoro de Itschimbia. London. *1914. Contribution al conocimiento de los aborigenes de Imbabura. Madrid. 1918a. Una punta de Jabalina de Puengasi (Pichincha). BSE, vol. 1, No. 2, p. 109. 98 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR 1918b. Artefactos prehistoricos del Guayas. BSE, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 253-275, 14 plates. 1919a. Artefactos prehistoricos del Guayas. BSE, vol.2, No. 5, pp. 169-172. *1919b. Contribucion al conocimiento de las lenguas indigenas, que se hablaron en el Ecuador interandino y occidental, con anterioridad a la conquista espafiola. BSE, vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 340-413. *1920a. Nueva contribucion al conocimiento de los aborigenes de la provincia de Imbabura. BSE, vol. 4, No. 10, pp. 1-120; vol. 4, No. 11, pp. 183-245. 1920b. Los tincullpas y notas acerca de la metalurgia de los aborigenes del Ecuador. BSE, vol. 5, Nos. 13-14, pp. 4-45. 1922. La edad del bronce en America del Sur. BANH, vol. 4, No. 9, pp. 119-126, 1 plate. *1927. Puruha: contribucion al conocimiento de los aborigenes de la provincia del Chimborazo. 2 vols., Quito. (Reprinted from BANH, Nos. 6, 12, 14, 17-26, 1921-24.) 1929. Notas de arqueologia cuzquefia. Dios y Patria, Nos. 22-23. Riobamba. *1930. Una gran marea cultural en el noroeste de Sudamerica. JSAP, n. ser., vol. 22, pp. 107-197. 1933. Curso de prehistoria ecuatoriana dictado en la Universidad Central de Quito. Printed by Universidad Central. Quito. *1941. El Ecuador interandino y occidental. Vol. 1. Quito. and Larrea, Carlos M. 1918. Un cementerio incasico y notas acerca de los Incas en el Ecuador. Revista de la Sociedad Juridico-Literaria, vol. 20, pp. 159-260. Quito. (Reprinted by Universidad Central. Quito, 1918.) Joyce, T. A. 1912. South American archaeology. London. *Kidder, Alfred, II 1940. South American penetrations into Middle America, in The Maya and their neighbors, pp. 441-459. New York. Larrea, Carlos M. 1919. Notas acerca de dos objetos arqueologicos de oro hallados en Imbabura. BSE, vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 208-216, 2 plates. and Jijon Y Caamano, Jacinto 1919. Notas acerca de la arqueologia de la provincia de Esmeraldas. Con- tribucion al conocimiento de los aborigenes de La Tola. BSE, vol. 3, Nos. 7-8, pp. 87-109. Le Gouhir, Jose Maria 1922-24. Tesis de la prehistoria ecuatoriana. Series I— III in Revista de la Asociacion Catolica de la Juventud Ecuatoriana. Series IV, Los Caras, RCHC, No. 9, 1923, pp. 436-452; No. 10, 1924, pp. 1-20. 1939. Estudios de la prehistoria ecuatoriana. BANH, vol. 18, No. 54, pp. 38-58. 1940. Estudios de la prehistoria ecuatoriana. BANH, vol. 19, No. 55, pp. 68-103. Leon, Segundo 1935. Excavaciones de tolas realizadas en la region de Intag. AUC, No. 293, pp. 187-207. Leon, Tito de 1939. Ingapirca; monumento incasico que el Ecuador esta perdiendo. Re- vista Municipal, Guayaquil, vol. 14, No. 59, pp. 54-59. BIBLIOGRAPHY 99 *Lothrop, Samuel K. 1940. South America as seen from Middle America, in The Maya and their neighbors, pp. 417-429. New York. Markham, Clements R. 1864. On quartz cutting instruments of the ancient inhabitants of Chanduy, near Guayaquil. Anthropological Review (Journal of the Anthropological Society of London), vol. 2, pp. 57-61. Matovelle, Julio J. M. n.d. Las Ruinas de Tomebamba. Cuenca. 1921. Cuenca de Tomebamba. Cuenca. Means, Philip Ainsworth 1931. Ancient civilizations of the Andes. New York. Mera I., Juan Leon 1919. Las cuevas de San Pedro. BSE, vol. 2, No. 5, pp. 196-207. Mora, Alfonso M. 1938. Apuntaciones de prehistoria sobre restos de civilizaciones americanas. RCHC, No. 30, pp. 170-192; No. 31, pp. 243-266. Moreno Mora, M. 1922. Contribution al estudio de la linguistica y etnologia canaris. Revista de Colegio Nacional Benigno Malo, vol. 1, No. 1. Cuenca. Orchard, W. C. 1925. Minute gold beads from La Tolita, Ecuador. Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation, Indian Notes, vol. 2. Pastor, Cesar Alfonso 1918. Barros precolombinos del Ecuador. Boletin de la Real Academia de Historia, vol. 72, pt. 6. Madrid. Proano, Juan Felix 1918a. Tradiciones de Cacha — La familia Duchicela. El Observador, No. 75. Riobamba. 1918b. Tradiciones de Puruha — La fortaleza de Cacha. El Observador, No. 76. Riobamba. 1918c. El Ilustrisimo Sr. Gonzalez Suarez y la historia del antiguo reino de Quito del P. Juan de Velasco. El Observador, No. 77. Riobamba. 1918d. La historia del antiguo reino de Quito del P. Juan de Velasco y la arqueologia ecuatoriana. El Observador, No. 79. Riobamba. 1918e. El baluarte de Macaji (Callana Pamba). El Observador, No. 86. Riobamba. 1918f. La tola de Macaji. El Observador, Nos. 81 and 89. Riobamba. 1918g. Los monumentos incasicos de Palmira. El Observador, No. 91. Riobamba. 1918h. Monumentos arqueologicos en el valle de Guano. El Observador, Nos. 108 and 139. Riobamba. 1923. Puruha, su arqueologia, sus tradiciones. Dios y Patria, vol. 1, No. 1. Riobamba. Rivet, Paul *1908. La race de Lagoa Santa chez les populations pre-colombiennes de l'Equateur. Bulletins et Memoires de la Societe d'Anthropologie de Paris, ser. 5, vol. 9, pp. 209-274. 100 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR Roth, Walter E. 1924. An introductory study of the arts, crafts, and customs of the Guiana Indians. Bureau of American Ethnology, 38th Annual Report. Rumazo Gonzalez, Jose 1933. El Ecuador en la America prehispanica. 207 pages, 10 plates. Saville, Marshall H. *1907. The antiquities of Manabi, Ecuador. Contributions to South American Archaeology, George G. Heye Expedition, *vol. 1. New York. 1909. Archaeological researches on the coast of Esmeraldas. Sixteenth Con- gress of Americanists, Vienna, pp. 337 ff. *1910. The antiquities of Manabi, Ecuador. Contributions to South American Archaeology, George G. Heye Expedition, vol. 2. New York. 1914. Precolumbian decoration of teeth in Ecuador. American Anthro- pologist, vol. 16, pp. 387-390. 1924. The gold-treasure of Sigsig, Ecuador. Leaflets of the Museum of the American Indian, No. 3. Spillman, F. 1928. Estudio comparado de craneos humanos antiguos procedentes de la provincia del Carchi, Ecuador. AUC, vol. 40, No. 264. Spinden, H. J. 1939. Archaeological survey of the northern Andes. Transactions of the New York State Academy of Science, ser. 2, vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 83-87. Stoepel, K. Th. 1913. Archaeological discoveries in Ecuador and southern Colombia during 1911. Eighteenth International Congress of Americanists, pp. 251-258. London. Sullivan, M. L. R. and Hellman, Milo *1925. The Punin calvarium. AMNH, vol. 23. 1938. El craneo de Punin. AUC, vol. 60, No. 304, pp. 729-742. Talbot, Francisco 1924. Ruinas de Joyaczhi. RCHC, No. 10, pp. 85-90. Uhle, Max 1889. Kultur und Industrie sudamerikanischer Volker. Vol. 1. Leipzig. *1920a. Los principios de las antiguas civilizaciones peruanas. BSE, vol. 4, No. 12, pp. 448-458. 1920b. Los principios de la civilization en la sierra peruana. BSE, vol. 4, Nos. 13 and 14, pp. 44-56, 7 plates. 1922a. Origenes centro-americanos. BANH, vol. 4, No. 9, pp. 1-7. *1922b. Sepulturas ricas de oro en la provincia del Azuay. BANH, vol. 4, No. 9, pp. 108-114. *1922c. Influencias mayas en el alto Ecuador. BANH, vol. 4, Nos. 10-11, pp. 205-240, 50 plates; vol. 5, Nos. 12, 13 and 14, pp. 1-3. 1922d. The excavations at Caiiar. The Panamerican Magazine, vol. 34, No. 4. London. 1922e. El problema paleolitico americano. BANH, vol. 5, Nos. 12, 13 and 14, pp. 302-316, 5 plates. 1922f. Las Huacas de Canar. JSAP, vol. 14, pp. 242-244. *1923a. Civilizaciones mayoides de la costa pacifica de Sudamerica. BANH, vol. 6, Nos. 15, 16 and 17, pp. 87-92, 4 plates, 1 map. BIBLIOGRAPHY 101 1923b. Toltecas, Mayas y civilizaciones sudamericanas. BANH, vol. 7, No. 18, pp. 1-33, 15 plates. *1923c. Las ruinas de Tomebamba. 6 plates, 11 maps. Quito. 1924. Cronologia y relaciones de las antiguas civilizaciones panamenas. BANH, vol. 9, Nos. 24, 25 and 26, pp. 190-207, 8 plates. 1926a. Los elementos constitutivos de las civilizaciones suramericanas. AUC, vol. 36. 1926b. Excavaciones arqueologicas en la region de Cumbaya. AUC, vol. 37. *1927a. Las antiguas civilizaciones esmeraldenas. AUC, vol. 38. 1927b. Estudios esmeraldefios. AUC, vol. 39. 1928a. Las ruinas de Cuasmal. AUC, vol. 40. 1928b. Desarollo y origen de las civilizaciones americanas. Proceedings, Twenty-third International Congress of Americanists, pp. 31-43. New York. 1928c. Spate Mastodonten in Ecuador. Proceedings, Twenty-third Inter- national Congress of Americanists, pp. 247-258. New York. 1929. Estado actual de la prehistoria ecuatoriana. Quito. 1930. El reino de Quito. BANH, vol. 10, Nos. 27, 28 and 29. *1931. Las antiguas civilizaciones de Manta. BANH, vol. 12, Nos. 33, 34 and 35, pp. 5-72, 11 plates. 1933. Estudio sobre las civilizaciones del Carchi e Imbabura. Quito. *1935. Die alten Kulturen Perus im Hinblick auf die Archaeologie und Geschichte des amerikanischen Kontinents. Berlin. 1936. Las antiguas civilizaciones del Ecuador y Peru. BANH, vol. 13, Nos. 36-39. 1937. Las ruinas de Cochasqui. Revista del Museo Nacional de Lima, vol. 6, pp. 86-91. 1939. Las ruinas de Cochasqui. BANH, vol. 18, No. 54, pp. 5-14. Vega Toral, Tomas 1920. La Tomebamba de los Incas. Cuenca. 1928. El castillo de Inga-Pirca. RCHC, No. 14, pp. 87-99. 1929. El castillo de Inga-Pirca. RCHC, No. 15, pp. 43-100. Velasco, Juan de 1841-44. Historia del reino de Quito en la America meridional. Quito. Verneau, R. 1907. Les collections anthropologiques ecuatoriennes du Dr. Rivet. JSAP, n. ser., vol. 4, pp. 209-224. and Rivet, Paul *1912. Ethnographie ancienne de l'Equateur. Vol. 1. Paris. *1922. Ethnographie ancienne de l'Equateur. Vol. 2. Paris. Villiers, Cecil H. 1931. Observaciones sobre las ruinas incasicas de Molleturo (Azuay). RCHC, No. 19, pp. 277-289, 1 plate. Von Buchwald, Otto 1909. Ecuatorianische Grabhiigel. Globus, Braunschweig, vol. 96, pp. 154-157. 1917a. Tolas ecuatorianas. El Grito del Pueblo, Nos. 5532, 5534. Guaya- quil. 1917b. Tolas ecuatorianas. Physis, vol. 3, pp. 250-262, 6 figs. Buenos Aires. 102 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR 1918a. Migraciones sud-americanas. BSE, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 227-236. 1918b. Notas acerca de la arqueologia del Guayas. BSE, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 237-252. 1920. Notas etnologicas del Ecuador occidental. BSE, vol. 4, No. 11, pp. 285-293, 7 plates. 1921. Un sello cilindrico. BSE, vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 155-156, 1 plate. Wallace, Alfred Russel 1853. A narrative of travels on the Amazon and Rio Negro. London. Wilson, J. S. 1886. Geological notes of the Pacific coast of Ecuador and on some evidences of the antiquity of man in that region. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, vol. 22, pt. 1, pp. 567-570. Wolf, Theodor 1880. Hieroglyphische Steinschrift aus Ecuador. Zeitschrift fur Ethnologie, vol. 12, pp. 222-223. INDEX Agriculture, 22, 81, 82 Alausi, 23-25, 84, 87 Amazonic influence in highland of Ecuador, 31, 68, 69, 84, 89 Arawak, Palta affiliation with, 31 Artifacts from Cerro Narrio, bone, 68, 69; clay, 70; metal, 69, 70; shell, 69; stone, 67, 68 Atlatl spur, 69 Awls, bone, 68 Ax, copper, 70 Azuay, 27-29 Beads, shell, 69; stone, 67 Burials, 20, 38, 39, 72, 73, 76 Cahar Valley, prehistory of, 79-85; temporal relations of sites in, 83 Cahari, language, 26; people, 26, 84, 85, 86 Carapali, 31 Carmen, 83 Carved ornaments, stone, 68 Cashaloma, 75-78, 82, 83 Catamayo Valley, 33, 34, 88 Celt, stone, 67 Central America, relation of Ecuador to, 15, 26, 56, 63, 85, 86, 88, 90 Cerro Narrio, activities of treasure hunters at, 35, 36; description of site, 35; excavations at, 36-44; periods at, see Early and Late Cerro Narrio Chambo River, 18, 22, 87 Chanchan Valley, 58, 84, 89 Chaullabamba, 51, 64, 83, 85; see also "Mayoid" Chavin, 28 Chilpas, 32 Chimu, 66 Chira River, 33 Chiriqui, relation of clay seats to, 56 Chorotegan language, relation of Cahari to, 26 Chronology, 29, 63, 64, 66, 79, 80, 86-89 Churo de Llullin, 19 Churos, 18, 19, 20 Clavijo, Ezequiel, 27, 35, 67 "Clay seat" culture, 35, 56, 75 Collections, archaeological, 13; Arriaga 27; Central University of Quito Museum of, 61; Cordero, 27, 28 Duran, 27-29; Gallegos, 22, 23 Goetz, 21. 22; Jijon, 12, 70, 84 Konanz, 69; Lequerica, 28, 31, 33, 34; San Francisco de Sales, Con- vent of, 23-25 Copper, objects of, 70 Cordero Palacios, Octavio, 26 Corrals, Zula, 19, 20 Cross-dating, 82-84, 86, 88 Deer, 68 Early Cerro Narrio, 80-87 Ecuadorean coast, relation of southern highland to, 58, 59, 66, 69, 83-85, 89 Elen Pata, 62, 63, 84, 89 Esmeraldas, 58, 84 Estolica; see Atlatl spur Ferdon, E. N., Jr., 12, 15, 89 Figurines, pottery, 70; shell, 67, 69; stone, 67 Gold, objects of, from Azuay, 29, 89; from Cerro Narrio, 35, 36, 69 Gonzalez Suarez, Federico, 27 Guando, 32 Guano; see San Sebastian Guasuntos, 25 Hearth, 42, 71 Houses, 38, 39, 42, 70-72, 81, 82 Huancarcuchu, 83 Huavalac, 63, 84, 87 Huigra, 58, 84 Inca: conquest of Cahari, 26, 80; horizon, in Azuay, 26, 29, in Canar, 26, 67, 76, 82-84, 87, in Saraguro, 32, 88, in southern Chimborazo, 19, 25, in southern Ecuador, 15, 86; influence, at Cashaloma, 76, 77, 78, 82, 84, at Cerro Narrio, 67, 83, at Chilpas, 32, at Guasuntos. 25, at Joyaczhi, 84, at Sumay Pamba, 29, 88, at Valle Hermoso, 34 ; see also Pottery, Inca Inga-pirca, 26, 63 Jijon y Caamano, Jacinto, 15, 25, 26, 31, 34, 35, 61, 63, 64, 70, 83, 84, 87, 88, 89 Jivaro Indians, 31 Joyaczhi, 58, 77, 84 Jubones River, 29, 30, 87 Land-snail shells, used as food, 69; in burials, 69, 72 Late Cerro Narrio, 80, 81, 83-87 Llama, 20, 68 Loja, 30-34, 89 Lothrop, S. K., 88 103 104 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR Macas, 25, 58, 61, 65, 84, 87, 89 Maguaso, Hacienda, 22 Maize, 22, 38, 81, 82 Manabi, 59, 84 Manioc, 82 Manioc-grater, 25, 58 "Mayoid" culture or period, in Azuay, 26, 27, 29, 83; in Cafiar, 26, 27; at Cerro Narrio, 35, 44, 64; in Loja, 31; in southern Ecuador, 15; see also Pottery, "Mayoid" ware Means, P. A., 31, 89 Metate, 22 Mochica language, 26 Naranjal River, 84 Needles, bone, 68 Nudo del Azuay, 18, 62, 84 Paja (paramo grass) probably used for thatch, 42, 71, 82 Palta Indians, 26, 31, 34, 89 Panpipes, pottery, 70 Pendants, shell, 69 Peruvian coast, 33, 34 Postholes, 38, 39, 42, 70, 71, 72 Pottery Black Engraved, 24, 59, 75, 76 Brown Engraved, 24 Cafiar Polished, 53, 54, 74, 79, 83, 91; color and paste, 53; decoration, 53; form, 53; surface treatment, 53 Chavin, Coastal, 28 Chimu, 34, 66 "clay seats" or drums, 35, 56, 75 decoration: anthropomorphic, 21, 28, 52, 53, 54, ears, 20, 28, eye, treat- ment of, 28, 52, 54, face, treatment of, 28, 52, 53, 54, mouth, 28, 54, nose, 28, 52; brushed surface, 54; engraved, 24, 28, 30, 58, 59, 60; fabric impression, 33; incised, 22, 23, 25, 49, 56, 58, 61, 62, 63, 76; limonite in grooves, 24, 59; nega- tive design, 20, 21, 22, 25, 29, 53, 60, 61, 64, 65, 66; painting, 49, 50, 51, 52, 56, 59, 60, 61, 62, 64, 65, 66; polish, 48, 50, 51, 53, 54, 56, 59, 60, 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 76, line luster, 48, 49, 52, 54, 76, 83; punctates, linear, 24, reed, 33, 76, 84; slip, 48, 49, 53, 54, 56, 58, 59, 60, 62, 64, 76, 77; rims, notched, 20; zoomorphic, 52, 62 Elen Pata, 62, 63, 84 form: bulbous vessels, 52, 83; cantim- plora, 21, 25; compotera, 20, 22, 25, 32, 50, 63, 75, 76, 77, 78; cooking vessels, 50, 51, 56; double jar, 29; "drinking tube," 21, 62; fruit- bowl, see compotera; plates, 53; ring base, 53; shoe-shaped, 49; triple bowl, 25; tripod vessels, 22, 23, 32, 33, 54, 75, 76, hoja de cabuya legs, 23, 54, 76; storage jars, 54, 56 Glossy Black Engraved, 24, 59 Glossy Red Engraved, 24, 59, 60, 74, 75, 76 Glossy Red Negative, 60, 61, 74 Granulated ware, 54 Gray Engraved, 24, 59 Group X, 58-62, 82, 84, 86, 87, 89 Huavalac, 63, 84 Inca, 27, 77, 78 Intrusive wares at Cerro Narrio, 56- 66, 80, 84, 86, 87 Localities and sites: Azuay, 27-29; Cafiar, 27; Carapali, 32; Casha- loma, 75-78, 82, 83; Catamayo Valley, 88; Cerro Narrio, 44-66 Chilpas, 32; Gonzol, 25; Guando 32, 33; Guasuntos, 25; Macas, 25 58, 61, 65, 84, 87, 89; Maguaso, 22 23; Quillohuac, 74; Saraguro, 87 88; Shillu, 75, 82; Sumay Pamba 30; Trapichillo, 33; Zula, 20-22 "Mayoid" ware, 51 Narrio Gross, 54, 56, 74, 76, 79, 91 ; color and paste, 54; decoration, 56; form, 54; surface finish, 56 Narrio Red-on-Buff, 25, 46-50, 74, 75, 76, 77, 79, 83, 91; color and paste, 48; decoration, 48; form, 48; Late forms, 48, 50; surface finish, 48; Variant A, 49; Variant B, 49; Variant C, 49; Variant D, 50 Narrio Red-on-Buff Fine, 50-52, 74, 75, 76, 77, 83, 91; color and paste, 51; decoration, 51; form, 51; sur- face finish, 51 paste analysis, 91 Peruvian influences, 28, 66, 67 Puruha, 21, 62, 63, 86, 87 Quartz-Studded, 25, 58, 75, 78, 84 Red Banded Incised, 25, 61, 75, 84 Red Engraved, 58, 59, 75, 76 San Sebastian, 63, 84 Tacalzhapa, 56; see also "Clay seat" culture terminology, 46 Tuncahuan, 22, 23, 25, 63-66, 86, 87 Variant A, 64; Variant B, 64 Variant C, 65; Variant D, 65 Variant E, 66; Variant F, 66 White-on-Red, 65, 74, 75, 78, 84 Pottery-smoothers, clay, 70; stone, 68 Projectile points, stone, 67; possible use of sting-ray spines as, 68, 69 Proto-Nazca, 15 Proto-Panzaleo II, 31, 64 Puruha, area, 18, 22, 25, 87; influence in Cafiar, 84, 88; movement south- INDEX 105 ward, 22, 84; people, 25; see also Pottery, Puruha Puruha-Mochica, proposed language family, 26 Quillohuac, 74 Rabbit, 68 Rivet, Paul, see Verneau and Rivet Roth, Walter E., 69 San Francisco de Sales Convent, 23, 25 San Sebastian, 84, 87 Santiago River, 82, 83, 85 Saraguro, 30-33, 87, 88 Shell, engraved design on, 69 Shillu, 75, 82, 87 Sites; see Pottery, localities Spatula, bone, 68 Spindle whorls, 67, 68, 70 Sting-ray spines, 68, 69 Stratification, 17, 79, 80, 86 Sumay Pamba, 29, 30, 87 Tacalzhapa, 56; see also "Clay seat" culture Tambos, Inca, 18, 19, 34 Thatch, see Paja Tiahuanaco, 29, 31, 35, 66, 89 Tomebamba, 26, 78 Trapichillo, 33 Tuncahuan; chronological relation, to Early Cerro Narrio, 63, 64, 66, 88, to Puruha, 63, 88, 89; period, in Canar, 35, 63, 64, 84, in Loja, 31; see also Pottery, Tuncahuan Uhle, Max, 15, 26, 27, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 44, 46, 51, 56, 64, 66, 67, 69, 72, 83, 85, 87, 88 Upano Valley; see Macas Valle Hermoso, 34, 88 Verneau, R., and Rivet, P., 19, 26, 27-29, 31, 34, 64, 70 Wallace, A. R., 68 Whistle, bone, 68 Yuca; see Manioc; Manioc-grater Z6, site, 20 Zula, 18-22, 87 PLATES Plate 1. FOTTERY AND METATE FROM ZULA, SITE Z6 Fig. 1. Burial 8; diameter 16 cm. Fig. 3. 78 cm. long and 66 cm. wide. Fig. 2. Burial 8; diameter 12.5 cm. Fig. 4. Burial 7; diameter 13 cm. Fig. 5. Burial 8; height 17 cm. THE UBRMtf OF THE IHUHM! * *»m Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 1 2 alas. "^■^ J^^^ Plate 2. POTTERY FROM ZULA; GOETZ COLLECTION Fig. 1. Height 37 cm. Fig. 4. Height 39 cm. Fig. 2. Diameter 12.5 cm. Fig. 5. Diameter 14 cm. Fig. 3. Diameter 13 cm. Fig. 6. Diameter 19.5 cm. Fig. 7. Diameter 15 cm. THE LIBRARY OF THE mimn * ***** Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 2 c t Mpy ZuA 7 ti Plate 3. POTTERY FROM HACIENDA MAGUASO GALLEGOS COLLECTION Fig. 1. Diameter 16 cm. Fig. 4. Diameter 13 cm. Fig. 2. Diameter 17 cm. Fig. 5. Height 10.5 cm. Fig. 3. Diameter 16 cm. Fig. 6. Diameter 13 cm. Fig. 7. Diameter 12 cm. Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 3 Plate 4. POTTERY FROM HACIENDA MAGUASO GALLEGOS COLLECTION Fig. 1. Diameter 12.5 cm. Fig. 3. Diameter 17 cm. Fig. 2. Diameter 13 cm. Fig. 4. Diameter 18 cm. Fig. 5. Diameter 10 cm. THE UBBM1 Of THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 4 Plate 5. POTTERY FROM ALAUSI AND GUASUNTOS COLLECTION OF CONVENTO SAN FRANCISCO DE SALES Figs. 5-7. Black Engraved; Alausi. Figs. 1-4. Glossy Black Engraved; Fig. 10. Brown Engraved; Alausi. Alausi. Figs. 11-13. Carelessly Engraved Red; A 1 mi m Fig. 8. White-on-Red; Guasuntos; height 6.5 cm. FlGS. 14-17. Narrio Red-on-Buff; Fig. 9. Gray Engraved; Alausi. Alausi. Of ^.uuutt Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 5 4 h. . .-:"&» *t f MT"" Plate 6. SHERDS FROM ALAUSI COLLECTION OF CONVENTO SAN FRANCISCO DE SALES Figs. 1-8. Glossy Red Engraved. Figs. 11-12, 15. Red Banded Incised. Figs. 9-10. Thin Gray Engraved. Figs. 13-14. Quartz-Studded. THE LIBRAE OF THE umvuumty «f Hxmm Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 6 » * w ^♦Ifts Plate 7. SHERDS FROM MACAS COLLECTION OF UNIVERSIDAD CENTRAL Figs. 1-9. Red Banded Incised. Fig. 16. White-on-Red. Figs. 10-15. Local wares(?). Fig. 17. Quartz-Studded. Of THt Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate *m Plate 8. POTTERY FROM AZUAY Fig. 1. Type A face; probably from Quinjeo; diameter 31 cm.; Cordero Collection. Fig. 2. Type A face; probably from Quinjeo; height 16 cm.; Duran Collection. Fig. 3. Type A face; provenience unknown; diameter 12 cm.; Cordero Collection. Fig. 4. Type A face; provenience unknown; height 24 cm.; Cordero Collection. Fig. 5. Aberrant type A face (Janus type); provenience unknown; diameter 22 cm.; Cordero Collection. THE LI6HAKY OF THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 8 Plate 9. POTTERY FROM AZUAY Fig. 1. Type A face; Cullca, near Cuenca; height 16.5 cm.; Verneau and Rivet, 1922, plate 53. Fig. 2. Type A face; Paute; height 12 cm.; Verneau and Rivet, 1922, plate 50. Fig. 3. Type A face; Paute; height 18 cm.; Verneau and Rivet, 1922, plate 53. Fig. 4. Type A face; provenience unknown; height 12 cm.; Duran Collection. Fig. 5. Type B face; provenience unknown; height 17.5 cm.; Cordero Collection. Fig. 6. Type A face; Paute; height 14.7 cm.; Verneau and Rivet, 1922, plate 53. Figs. 7-8. Type B face (Janus); Cojitambo; height 13.5 cm.; Verneau and Rivet, 1922, plate 52. Fig. 9. Type B face; provenience unknown; height 14.5 cm.; Duran Collection. THE UBRM OF THE iimvwin af ***** Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 9 Plate 10. POTTERY FROM AZUAY; DURAN COLLECTION Fig. 1. Type C face; Chocar, Caiiar; height 14.5 cm. Fig. 2. Type C face; Gualaceo; height 11 cm. Fig. 3. Type C face; Charatsol, near Azogues; height 15 cm. Fig. 4. Coastal Chavin type; Puente de El Descanso, Azuay; height 23 cm. Fig. 5. Non-communicating double vessel with negative design; provenience unknown; height 6 cm. I hi. u...... OF THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 10 w Plate 11. SHERDS FROM SUMAY PAMBA AND GUANDO Scale 1 : 2 Fig. 1. Red-on-Buff; Sumay Pamba, site C. Fig. 2. Red-slipped ware; Sumay Pamba, site C. Fig. 3. Red-on-Buff; Sumay Pamba, site C. Fig. 4. Gray ware; Sumay Pamba, site C. Figs. 5-6. Red-slipped bowl rims; Sumay Pamba, site C. Fig. 7. Sherd with fabric impression on interior; Guando. Fig. 8. Red-slipped compotera; Guando. BBiifiiiftfv at Mjuifti* Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 11 ■•■• Plate 12. SHERDS FROM TRAPICHILLO, CATAMAYO VALLEY Scale 1: 2.5 Figs. 1-2. Orange ware with applique rims. Figs. 3-6. Brick-red ware, applique bands with punctates. Figs. 7-10. Orange ware with purple painted bands. OF THE imw«ttfflr ft* UM*W Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 12 < ~: '*&* * * Plate 18. NARRIO RED-ON-BUFF: DECORATIVE FEATURES Scale 1 : 3 Fig. 1. Pinched line low on shoulder; Cerro Narrio, Trench IN, level 5. Fig. 2. Pinched line on shoulder; Cerro Narrio, Trench IS, level 10. Fig. 3. Punctates on neck; Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 4. Pinched line on shoulder, purple lines; Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 5. Punctates on neck, purple lines; Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 6. Pinched line on shoulder, purple lines; Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 7. Punctates on neck; Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 8. Notched welt on neck; Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 9. Notched welt on body; Cerro Narrio, Trench IS, level 9. Fig. 10. Punched welt below neck; Shillu, Pit 1, level 1. Fig. 11. Notched welt; Cerro Narrio, Trench IS, level 11. Fig. 12. Notched welt; Cerro Narrio, Trench IS, level 12. THE LIBHAtllf Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 18 fr Plate 19. CERRO NARRIO: NARRIO RED-ON-BUFF Scale 1: 3.1 Fig. 1. Trench IN, level 9. Fig. 2. Trench IN, level 10. Fig. 5. Trench IN, levels 11-12. Fig. 6. Trench IN, level 7. Variant A Fig. 3. Trench 1M, level 10. Fig. 4. Trench IS, level 13. Variant B Fig. 7. Trench 1M, level 13. Fig. 8. Trench 1M, level 9. Fig. 9. Surface. Fig. 10. Trench IN, level 10. Fig. 11. Trench 4M, level 6. Variant C Fig. 12. Trench 1 (stratification test), level 11. Fig. 13. Trench 3, level 4. OF THE S Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 19 ... .-•••' 7 10 Plate 20. NARRIO RED-ON-BUFF Scale 1: 3.2 Variant D Fig. 1. Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 2. Cerro Narrio, Trench IS, level 3. Fig. 3. Cerro Narrio, surface. Figs. 4-6. Shillu, surface. Figs. 7-8. Cerro Narrio, surface. Figs. 9-12. Shillu, surface. Figs. 13-14. Cerro Narrio, surface. Figs. 15-17. Nail impressed; Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 18. Pear-shaped jar; Cerro Narrio, Trench 2, level 2. Fig. 19. Nail impressed; Cerro Narrio, surface. OF THE Field Museum of Natural History D i Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 20 4 ^*^ 3 10 ^^^^^^^ , 13 \ V 17 18 fin* 16 19 Plate 21. NARRIO RED-ON-BUFF FINE Scale (Figs. 4-9) 1: 3 Fig. 1. Cerro Narrio, Trench 4M, level 4; height 19 cm. • Fig. 2. Provenience unstated; diameter 12.2 cm.; Uhle, 1922c, fig. 26. Fig. 3. Cerro Narrio, diameter 19 cm.; Arriaga Collection. Fig. 4. Rim interior; Cerro Narrio, Trench 11, level 12. Fig. 5. Rim exterior; Cerro Narrio, Trench 1M, level 12. Fig. 6. Rim interior; Cerro Narrio, Trench 11, level 10. Fig. 7. Rim interior; Cerro Narrio, Trench 11, level 11. Fig. 8. Rim interior; Cerro Narrio, Trench 15, level 12. Fig. 9. Rim interior; Cerro Narrio, Trench IS, level 5. Fig. 10. Provenience unstated; diameter 14 cm.; Uhle, 1922c, fig. 22, A. OF THE tMW&WTy ft? NUilMM* Field Museum of Natural Historv Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 21 i w Plate 22. CERRO NARRIO: NARRIO RED-ON-BUFF FINE Scale 1 : 3 Painted decorations Fig. 1. Trench 15, level 6. Fig. 5. Surface. Fig. 2. Trench 1M, level 13. Fig. 6. Trench 11, level 9. Fig. 3. Surface. Fig. 7. Trench 15, level 4. Fig. 4. Trench 11, level 3. Fig. 8. Surface. Fig. 9. Red spiral, and vertical line luster; surface. Fig. 10. Trench 11, level 12. Fig. 11. Trench IN, level 10. Fig. 12. Surface. Line luster Fig. 13. Trench 11, level 5. Fig. 14. Trench 15, level 9. Figs. 15-19. Surface. OF THE lUttMUWTV ft* MWm Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 22 4 4 m 10 12 13 14 V 16 0 # 4 17 ,8 19 Plate 23. CERRO NARRIO: NARRIO RED-ON-BUFF FINE Scale 1: 2.6 Line luster Figs. 1-3. Surface. Fig. 4. Trench 11, level 5. Jars with bulbous bodies Fig. 5. Trench 15, level 10. Fig. 7. Trench 4M, level 7. Fig. 6. Trench IS, level 11. Figs. 8-10. Surface. Fig. 11. Trench 11, level 9. Zoomorphic heads Fig. 12. Trench 11, level 11. Figs. 13-14. Trench 4M, level 7. THE LIBRARY OF THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 23 * * » %j^ .. #JL. 4,-r * 13 12 %J 14 Plate 24. CERRO NARRIO: ANTHROPOMORPHIC AND ZOOMORPHIC DECORATIONS Scale 1: 2.5 Fig. 1. Trench 1M, level 13. Fig. 2. Trench IN, level 9. Fig. 3. Surface. Early forms Fig. 4. Trench IS, level 9. Fig. 5. Surface. Fig. 6. Trench 1M, level 10. / Fig. 7. Trench 14, level 5. Fig. 8. Surface. Fig. 9. Trench 6, level 2. Late forms Fig. 10. Trench 10, level 5. Fig. 11. Trench 6, level 2. Fig. 12. Surface. THE LlSfl OF THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 24 % t V r Q. K 12 Plate 25. CANAR POLISHED Fig. 1. Provenience unstated; diameter 10.5 cm.; Uhle, 1922c, fig. 44. Fig. 2. Provenience unstated; diameter 27 cm.; Uhle, 1922c, fig. 45. Fig. 3. Cerro Narrio, Trench 11, level 12; diameter 16.5 cm. Fig. 4. Cerro Narrio, Trench IN, level 9; diameter 12.5 cm. Fig. 5. Cerro Narrio, Trench 11, level 11; diameter 12.5 cm. • - OF THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 25 Plate 26. CERRO NARRIO: CANAR POLISHED Scale 1: 3.2 Bowls with scalloped rims Fig. 1. Trench IN, level 5. Fig. 2. Trench 1M, level 13. Fig. 3. Trench 11, level 11. Engraved bowl with vertical wall Fig. 4. Trench 4M, level 3. Negative design on interior surface Fig. 5. Trench 4M, level 8. Fig. 7. Trench 4M, level 8. Fig. 6. Trench 4M, level 7. Fig. 8. Trench 13, level 12. Fig. 9. Trench 3, level 5. Jars ivith flaring neck and constricted rim Fig. 10. Trench 1M, level 10. Fig. 12. Trench 1M, level 8. Fig. 11. Line luster; surface. Fig. 13. Trench IS, level 3. OF THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 26 ^Mfcj w * m 12 13 Plate 27. CERRO NARRIO: GRANULATED WARE AND COMPOTERAS WITH PAINTED FEET Scale 1:2.5 Granulated ware Fig. 1. Trench 4M, level 9. Fig. 2. Trench IN, level 8. Fig. 3. Trench 4M, level 8. Compotera feet with red painted lines Fig. 4. Trench 9, level 8. Fig. 6. Trench IS, level 6. Fig. 5. Trench IS, level 9. Figs. 7-10. Surface. - - OF THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 27 Plate 28. CERRO NARRIO: NARRIO GROSS Fig. 1. Trench 6, level 2; height 42 cm. Fig. 2. Trench 6, level 2; height 17.5 cm. Fig. 3. Trench 6, level 2 ; height 76 cm. OF THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 28 Plate 29. NARRIO GROSS AND QUARTZ-STUDDED Scale (Figs. 1-5) 1: 3.2 Narrio Gross Fig. 1. Bowl with horizontal handle; Cerro Narrio, Trench 6, level 2. Fig. 2. Tripod leg; Cerro Narrio, Trench 6, level 3. Quartz-Studded Fig. 3. Cerro Narrio, surface. Figs. 4-5. Shillu, surface. Fig. 6. Huigra; diameter approximately 32 cm.; Konanz Collection. OF THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 29 Plate 30. CLAY SEATS Fig. 1. Cerro Narrio, surface; height 6 cm. Fig. 2. Cerro Narrio, height approximately 28 cm.; Jijon Collection. Fig. 3. Shillu, Pit 1, level 5; height 11 cm. Fig. 4. Shillu, Pit 3, level 3; length 16 cm. Fig. 5. Cerro Narrio, Trench 8, level 3; length 12 cm. Fig. 6. Cerro Narrio, diameter 25 cm.; Duran Collection. Figures 1, 3, and 5 are fragments of seat bottoms and are shown upside down. OF THE Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 30 Plate 31. RED ENGRAVED AND BLACK ENGRAVED Scale 1: 3.2 Red Engraved Figs. 1-2. Cerro Narrfo, surface. Fig. 5. CerroNarrio, Trench 1M, level 4. Fig. 3. Cerro Narrio, Trench 2, level 2. Fig. 6. Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 4. Shillu, surface. Fig. 7. Shillu, Pit 1, level 5. Black Engraved Figs. 8-9. Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 12. Cerro Narrio, Trench 6, level 2. Fig. 10. Cerro Narrio, Trench 1 (strati- „ ,0^ x, .^ uoi io _ _ ^ n , \ _ v FlG. 13. CerroNarrio, Trench 2, level 2. ncation test), level 3. Fig. 11. Shillu, surface. Fig. 14. Cerro Narrio, surface. Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 31 12 13 Plate 32. GLOSSY RED ENGRAVED Scale 1: 3.2 Fig. 1. Shillu, surface. Fig. 2. Cerro Narrio, Trench 6, level 7. Fig. 3. Cerro Narrio, Trench IS, level 2. Fig. 4. Shillu, Pit 1, level 1. Figs. 5-7. Shillu, surface. Fig. 8. Shillu, Pit 1, level 4. Fig. 9. Cerro Narrio, Trench 6, level 4. Figs. 10-11. Shillu, surface. Fig. 12. Cerro Narrio, Trench IS, level 4. Fig. 13. Shillu, Pit 1, level 3. Figs. 14-15. Cerro Narrio, surface. OF THE MOW «F M#WW$ Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 32 * warn I 7**$ 10 13 14 ,. Plate 33. GLOSSY RED ENGRAVED AND GRAY ENGRAVED Scale (Figs. 4-7) 1: 1.3 Glossy Red Engraved Fig. 1. Shillu, Pit 1, level 1; height 14.5 cm. Fig. 2. Shillu, Pit 1, levels 2-3; height 13.5 cm. Gray Engraved Fig. 3. Red-slipped body below engraved area; Shillu, surface; height 9.5 cm. Figs. 4-5. Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 6. Cerro Narrio, Trench 1 (stratification test), level 3. Fig. 7. Cerro Narrio, Trench IN, level 3. OF THE wmm * mm Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 33 Plate 34. GLOSSY RED NEGATIVE, GLOSSY RED ENGRAVED AND RED BANDED INCISED Scale 1: 2.7 Figs. 1-2. Glossy Red Negative; Shillu, surface. Fig. 3. Aberrant Glossy Red Engraved; Cerro Narrio, Trench IN, level 4. Fig. 4. Glossy Red Negative; Shillu, surface. Fig. 5. Aberrant Glossy Red Engraved (fragment of same vessel as Figure 3); Cerro Narrio, Trench IN, level 4. Fig. 6. Aberrant Glossy Red Engraved (fragment of same vessel as Figures 3 and 5); Cerro Narrio, Trench IN, level 4. Red Banded Incised Figs. 7-8. Cerro Narrio, surface. Fig. 11. Cerro Narrio, Trench 6, level 4. Fig. 9. Shillu, Pit 2, level 5. Fig. 12. Shillu, surface. Fig. 10. Shillu, surface. Fig. 13. CerroNarrio, Trench IS, level 5. Fig. 14. Shillu, surface. lion/ ' OF THE *W Of tijjmm Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 34 # §P* k V 10 ■ ■^oc^ III** 10 15 17 20 Plate 54. VESSELS AND SHERDS OF CASHALOMA TYPE, SHOWING INCA INFLUENCE Fig. 1. Canar; height approximately 45 cm.; Konanz Collection. Fig. 2. Canar; height 15 cm.; Arriaga Collection. Fig. 3. Cashaloma, surface; length 10 cm. Fig. 4. Cashaloma, Pit 4, level 3; length 10.5 cm. Fig. 5. Canar; height 22.5 cm.; Arriaga Collection. Fig. 6. Canar; height approximately 20 cm.; Konanz Collection. Fig. 7. Canar; height approximately 34 cm.; Konanz Collection. THE LIBRARY OF THE >< A* UJJMDIS Field Museum of Natural History Anthropology, Vol. 35, Plate 54 THE LIBRARY OF THE PUBLICATIONS FOR THE INSTITUTE OF ANDEAN RESEARCH Projects in Latin America Under the Sponsorship of The Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs NORTHEASTERN MEXICO la. Ekholm, Gordon F. Excavations at Tampico and Panuco in the Huasteca. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 39, pt. 1. NORTHWESTERN MEXICO 2a. Kelly, Isabel. Excavations in western Jalisco. University of California, Ibero-Americana, No. 25. CENTRAL COAST OF PERU 3a. Strong, William Duncan, and Willey, Gordon R. Archaeological notes on the central coast of Peru, in Archaeological Studies in Peru, 1941-42. Papers in Archaeology and Ethnology of the Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, vol. 1, pt. 1. 3b. Strong, William Duncan, and Corbett, John M. A ceramic sequence at Pachacamac, Peru, in Archaeological Studies in Peru, 1941-42. Papers in Archaeology and Ethnology of the Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, vol. 1, pt. 2. 3c. Willey, Gordon R. Excavations in the Chancay Valley, Peru, in Archaeo- logical Studies in Peru, 1941-42. Papers in Archaeology and Ethnology of the Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, vol. 1, pt. 3. 3d. Willey, Gordon R. A supplement to the pottery sequence at Ancon, Peru, in Archaeological Studies in Peru, 1941-42. Papers in Archaeology and Ethnology of the Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, vol. 1, pt. 4. CHILE 4a. Bird, Junius. Excavations in northern Chile. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 38, pt. 4. VENEZUELA AND THE WEST INDIES 5a. Howard, George D. Excavations at Ronquin, Venezuela. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 28. 5b. Osgood, Cornelius. Excavations at Tocoron, Venezuela. Yale Univer- sity Publications in Anthropology, No. 29. 107 108 EXCAVATIONS IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR 5c. Osgood, Cornelius. The Ciboney culture of Cayo Redondo, Cuba. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 25. 5d. Osgood, Cornelius, and Howard, George D. An archaeological survey of Venezuela. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 27. 5e. Rouse, Irving. Archaeology of the Maniabon Hills, Cuba. Yale Uni- versity Publications in Anthropology, No. 26. COLOMBIA 6a. Bennett, Wendell C. Archaeological regions of Colombia: a ceramic survey. Yale University Publications in Anthropology. 6b. Ford, James A. Excavations in the vicinity of Cali, Colombia. Yale Uni- versity Publications in Anthropology. SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS OF PERU 7a. Kidder, Alfred, II. Some early sites in the northern Lake Titicaca basin. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, vol. 27, No. 1. 7b. Rowe, John Howland. An introduction to the archaeology of Cuzco. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, vol. 27, No. 2. 7c. Tschopik, Marion Hutchinson. Some notes on the archaeology of the Department of Puno, Peru. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, vol. 27, No. 3. SOUTHERN COAST OF PERU 8a. Newman, Marshall T. Some Indian skeletal material from the coast of Peru. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, vol. 28, No. 1. 8b. Tello, Julio C. Paracas. University of San Marcos, Lima. NORTHERN PERU AND ECUADOR 9a. McCown, Theodore D. Survey of northern Peru: Huamachuco. Uni- versity of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, vol. 42, No. 1. 9b. Collier, Donald, and Murra, John V. Survey and excavations in southern Ecuador. Field Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Series, vol. 35. CENTRAL AMERICA 10a. Longyear, John. Excavations in Salvador. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, vol. 9, No. 2. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS-URBANA 3 0112 004043805 $mi MfeSBfW 1 JHHH HE I a 1 9 1