versity of inecticut ibraries Sflc; ' o Ty^*"^ rii»e »iAft25'4J Part I, Argasidae] [October, 1908 TICKS A MONOGRAPH OF THE IXODOIDEA By GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL M.A., M.D., Ph.D., Sc.D, F.R.S. Fellow of Magdalene College Quick Professor of Biology in the University of Cambridge CECIL WARBURTON M.A., F.Z.S. Christ's College, Zoologist to the Royal Agricultural Society W. F. COOPER and L. E. ROBINSON B.A., F.Z.S., F.L.S. A.R.C.Sc. (Lond.) CAMBRIDGE AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON : CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, FETTER LANE (C. F. CLAY, Manager) AND H. K. LEWIS, GOWER STREET NEW YORK: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS ¥&l LEIPSIC : BROCKHaUS _ BERLIN : A. ASHER & CO. BOMBAY AND CALCUTTA: MACMILLAN Sc CO., LTD. THE MACMILLAN i COMPANY NEW YORK Published by the Cambridge University Press THE JOURNAL OF HYGIENE EDITED BY GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL, M.D., Ph.D., Sc.D., F.R.S. QUICK PBOTESSOB OF BIOIiOGT IN THK UMIVKBBXTT OF CAUBBIOOE Ijr CONJUNCTION WITH JOHN S. HALDANE, M.D., F.R.S. ARTHUR NEWSHOLME, M.D., F.R.C.P. BSAOSB tK VBYBlOtOa^ IN THB MEDIOAti OFFIOBB TO THB tJNIVBEHiTT OP OXFOBD LOOAL GOVBRHMBNT BOABD CHARLES J. MARTIN, M.B., D.Sc, F.R.S. DIBECTOB OF THB LI8TBB rNSTITCTE OF PBBVKNTIVK MEDICINE, LONDON The Journal of Hygiene is issued quarterly. A volume containing about 500 pages, with plates and figures, is issued annually. Volumes I, 11, and III (1901-3) complete. In Four Parts, paper covers, 15*. net per volume. Bound in buckram, 18s. 6o?. net per volume. Volumes IV, V, VI, and VII (1904-7) complete. In Four Parte, paper covers, 21s. net per volume. Bound in buckram, 25s. net per volume. The subscription price is £1. Is. per volume (post-free), payable in advance ; single numbers 7s. net (Plague Numbers, Voi VI, no. 4, Vol. VII, nos. 3 and 6, and Vol. Vm, no. 2, Price 6». net each.) Subscriptions may be sent to any Bookseller, or to Mb C. F. CLAY, Manager, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Fetter Lane, London, E.C. CONTENTS OF VOL. VIII, NO. 4 (October 1908) {All rights reserved) Boycott, A. E. and Damant, G. C. C. Experiments on the Influence of Fatness on Susceptibility to Caisson Disease. 44.5 CuRRiE, J. K. Abnormal Reactions to Horse Serum in the Serum Treatment of Cerebrospinal Fever. (Three Figures.) 457 DucKERiNG, G. Elmhirst. The Cause of Lead Poisoning in the Tinning of Metals. (One Figure.) . . . . . 474 RuFFER, Marc Armand and Willmorb, J. Graham. The Drinking Water of Steamships 504 Green, Alan B. Some Experiments on Immunity against Vaccinia in Animals . . . . . . . .521 Green, Alan B. The Influence of Temperature, and some other Physical Conditions, on Calf Vaccine. (One Figure.) 525 Watson, Herbert EdmEston. A Note on the Variation of the Rate of Disinfection with Change in the Concentration of the Disinfectant. (One Figure.) . . . . . .536 Wilson, W. James. Bacteriological Obseryations on Colon Bacilli infecting the Urinary Tract, with special remarks on certain Colon Bacilli of the " Anaerogenes " class . 543 Abstracts of Official Publications, etc. The Campaign against Ankylostomiasis in Porto Rico .... 553 Publications received 556 TICKS A MONOGRAPH OF THE IXODOIDEA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, C. F. CLAY, Manager. ILontJon: FETTEE LANE, E.G. eFUinbursij : 100, PRINCES STREET. ALSO ILonton : H. K. LEWIS, 136, GOWER STREET, "W.C. Etipjifi: F. A. BROCKHAUS. iSerlin: A. ASHER AND CO. j^efa gorfe: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS. aSomfaag ant CTakutta : MACMILLAN AND CO., Ltd. [All rights reserved] QL TICKS (^^ A MONOGRAPH OF THE lAfhC IXODOIDEA By GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL M.A., M.D., Ph.D., Sc.D., F.R.S. Fellow of Magdalene College Quick Professor of Biology in the University of Cambridge CECIL WARBURTON M.A., F.Z.S. Christ's College, Zoologist to the Royal Agricultural Society W. F. COOPER and L. E. ROBINSON B.A., F.Z.S., F.L.S. A.R.C.Sc. (Lond.) Cambridge at the University Press 1908 im. CambrtOgt: PRINTED BY JOHN CLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS \> PREFATORY NOTE THE discovery of the economic importance of ticks as carriers of disease to man and domesticated animals has led to a vast increase of our knowledge of this group. No existing work in any language attempts to deal with the subject in a comprehensive manner, and the student is confronted with a very extensive and widely scattered literature from which he derives an impression of hopeless confusion. There is therefore urgent need for a work of the nature here attempted. The book will deal with the Classification, Structure and Biology of Ticks, the study of the group having occupied the authors for several years. Practically all that has been published on the subject has received adequate consideration. The parts on Classification have entailed much labour since it was found necessary to revise a large amount of the work which has been done by others. The book will be very fully illustrated by numerous text figures and plates, the majority of which are original, the remainder reproduced from the best sources. It was at first intended to publish a full account of the Ixodoidea or Ticks as a complete vohime, but the increasing demand for a work dealing with this group of parasites has caused us to decide to issue without delay the part relating to the Argasidae. Other parts will follow, and the whole, we hope, will be ready in about a year. The parts will be complete in themselves but are designed to form a volume of about 500 pages when all the parts have been published. Each part will be issued in a stiff paper cover and will include a bibliography printed on one side of thin paper so that the references can be conveniently cut out and gummed on index cards. A complete bibliography, including all the publications cited in each part, Avill conclude the volume. In the text the Harvard system of references is adopted, the year and page of the authors' papers being added after their names. Unless otherwise stated all the authors cited have been consulted in the original. The completed volume will also contain an adequate intro- duction, which we think it better to omit for the present. Cambridge August 1908 PAET I THE ARGASIDAE by G. H. F. NUTTALL and C. WARBURTON aided by W. F. COOPER and L. E. ROBINSON NOTE. G. H. F. Nuttall and C. Warburton are responsible for the systematic portion of this Part, while the biological section has been almost en- tirely in the hands of the former. W. F. Cooper and L. E. Robinson have assisted in collating the literature on the subject. CONTENTS OF PART I THE ARGASIDAE SECTION I DEALING WITH THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE ARGASIDAE (Illustrated by 3 plates and 116 figures in the text.) PAGE The features which distinguish the Argasidae from the Ixodidae ... 1 Family characters, synonymy and literature relating to the Argasidae . . 2-3 The genus Argas : generic characters, synonymy and literature ... 4 List of species ............. 5 Terms and signs used in the descriptions 6 Key for the determination of species of Argas 8 Description, Synonymy, Iconography and Literature relating to the following species : Argas persicus ............. 8 reflexus ............. 22 hermanni ............ 27 cucwnerinus ............ 28 transgariepinus ........... 29 hrumpti 30 aequalis . ............ 33 vespertilionis ............ 34 transversa ............ 5 hrevipes ............. 5 The genus Ornithodoros : synonymy and literature, generic characters . 39 List of species 41 Key for the determination of species of Ornithodoros ..... 42 Vlll Conteiits Description, Synonymy, Iconography and Literature relating to the following species : Ornithodoros savignyi „ mouhata „ coriaceus „ turicata „ talaje . „ pavimentosus „ erraticus „ tholozani „ lahorensis „ furcosus „ megnini „ canestrinii •)■> papillipes „ morbillosus PAGE 42 46 55 57 59 62 63 65 67 70 71 78 79 80 SECTION II DEALING WITH THE GENERAL BIOLOGY OF THE ARGASIDAE— THE EFFECTS OF THEIR BITES,— THEIR RELATION TO THE SPREAD OF DISEASE, ETC. The genus Argas. Argas persicus : Life history from the egg to the adult . . . . 81 Eflfects of bite on man and animals 85 Economic importance 87 In relation to disease 88 Methods of destroying 90 Argas reflexus : Life history 91 Eflfects of bite 92 In relation to disease .......... 94 Argas brumpti, eflfects of bite, habits, etc. ...... 95 The genus Ornithodoros. Ornithodoros moubata : Life history ....... 96 Eflfects of bite, treatment, prevention 98 In relation to disease .......... 100 Ornithodoros coriaceus, biology, effects of bite, etc 102 „ turicata 102 „ talaje . 103 „ tholozani 103 „ megnini .......... 103 For what is known regarding other species of Argasidae in this respect see Section I. The internal anatomy will be considered in the general introduction to the completed volume. LIST OF ILLUSTEATIONS Plate I. Fig. 1. Fig- 2. Fig. 3. Fig. 4-5. Plate II. Fig. 1-2 Plate III. Fig. 1-2 Argas reflexus ^, dorsum. „ reflexus $ , venter. „ persicus $, dorsum. „ vespertilionis, last stage nymph, dorsum and venter .to face p. 4 Ornithodoros savignyi 5 , dorsum and venter 42 talaje var. capensis, dorsum and venter to face p. 60 IN THE TEXT FIGURE A and B. Schematic, to show differences between Argasidae and Ixodidae 1. Ornithodoros coriaceus $ with names of parts referred to in the descriptions of Argasidae ....... 2. Argas persicus ^ , the capitulum with names of parts referred to in the descriptions of Argasidae 3-4. A. persicus 9 , dorsum and venter 5-8. A. persicus, details of integumental structure 9. A. persicus, the anus ..... 10. ^. jjemcMs, the spiracle .... 11-12. A. persicus, the male and female genital orifices, etc. . 13-14. A. persicus, the capitulum and lateral view of the pali 15-18. A. persicus, the digits of the chelicerae, the hypostome, and tarsus I seen in profile 19-23. A. persicus, representing stages of development from unfed larva to second stage nymph .... 24-25. A. persicus, the larva, dorsum and venter . 26. A. persicus, tarsus and foot, and hypostome of larva 27-28. A. reflexus ^ , dorsum and venter 29-32. A. reflexus, a palpal hair, digits and hypostome . 33. A. reflexus, tarsi I and IV . 34-35. A. hermanni, digit and hypostome 36-37. A. transgariepinus 9 , dorsum and venter . 38-41. .4. /;;•;< ;»/; 1893, p. 715.— Neumann, 1888, p. 89 ; 1892 a, p. 92 ; 1892 b, p. 96; 1896, p. 3, etc., and 1908, p. 26.— Blanchard, 1890, p. 329.— Canestrini, 1890, p. 530; 1892, p. 582.— Trouessart, 1891, p. 290; 1892, p. 35.— Efisio, 1892, p. 257.— Marx, 1892, p. 233.— Du Buysson, 1896.— Moniez, 1896, pp. 499-509.— Osborn, 1896, p. 255.— Morgan, 1899, p. 137.— Ward, 1900a, p. 196; 1900b, p. 437.— Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 401.— Banks, 1904, p. 45.— Aclogue, 1905, p. 536 (in- accessible).—Dbnitz, 1907, p. 24.— Pocock, 1907, p. 189.— Nuttall, 1908, p. 390. — Banks, 1908, p. 14, and many recent authors making casual mention. (Not to be confused with Argas Seoul., 1835, crustacean ; Arges Hann., 1835, crustacean ; Arges Goldf., 1839, crustacean ; Arges Val., 1840, fish ; Argus Boh., 1761, mollusk ; Argus Scop., 1777, lepidopteron ; Argus Poli, 1795, mollusk ; Argus Temm., 1815, bird; Argus Walk., 1837, arachnoid.) Carios Latreille, 1796, p. 176 ; 1806, p. 161. — Kolenati, 1857, p. 16. —Canestrini, 1890, p. 480.— Neumann, 1896, p. 19. Rhynchoprion Hermann, 1804, p. 69. — Heyden, 1826, p. 612. — Treviranus, 1831, p. 188.— Latreille, 1829, p. 288.— Canestrini, 1890, p. 531.— Trouessart, 1891, p. 290.— Railliet, 1893, p. 715.— Neumann, 1896, p. 3. (Not to be confused with Rhynchoprion or Rhyncoprion Oken, 1815, dipteron ; Rhynchoprium Marx, 1895, arachnoid.) Caris Latreille, 1806, p. 161 ; type, vespertilionis { = Carios renamed for no obvious reason); 1829, p. 290.— Risso, 1826, p. 182.— Heyden, 1826, p. 613.— Latreille, 1835, p. 511.— Gerstaecker, 1863, p. 343. (See also Audouin, 1832, p. 413.)— Dugfes, 1834 c, p. 14 (regards it as Argas larva). — Kolenati, 1857, p. 15 ; 1858, p. 4. — Murray, 1877, p. 181. — Canestrini and Fanzago, 1877, p. 184. — Haller, 1882, p. 312.— Canestrini, 1890, p. 480.— Trouessart, 1891, p. 290.— Neumann, 1896, p. 19.— Pocock, 1907, p. 189. (Not to be confused with Caris Fisch., 1821, col.) " Rhyachoprion {sic) Hermann," of Duges, 1834 c, p. 14. In our opinion the genus Argas comprises six well established species : 1. 2. persicus reflexus 3. 4. 5. 6. transgariepinus brumpti aequalis vespertilionis There are four doubtful species : 7. cucumerinus (possibly = reflexus var. magnus) . 8. hermanni (near to reflexus var. magtius) 9. transversa Banks, 1902, p. 70, PI. II, Fig. 9. (Species founded on one specimen ; description insufficient.) 10. brevipes Banks, 1908, p. 15, PI. I, Figs. 3, 4. (Descrip- tion insufficient. Legs shorter than in A. persicus; may be but a variety.) 8 22 29 30 33 34 28 27 6 Family Argasidae The following species have been suppressed : americanus, chinche, mauritianus, miniatus, radiatus, sanchezi = A. persicus ; columbae, magnus, marginatus — A. reflexus (including var. magnus) ; kochi = A. transgariepinus ; decussata, elUptica, fischeri, inermis, longimcma, pipistrellae, pidchella = A. vespertilionis ; strogu- loides Gervais, 1844, p. 231, is a purely nominal species (Nn., 1896, p. 25). A.forskali Audouin, 1827, p. 430, figured as a hexapod larva in Savigny, 1826, PI. IX, Fig. 13 (1 and 2 g.); mentioned in Duges, 1834, p. 32 ; called Hyalomma Forskaelii (Aud.) by C. L. Koch, 1844, p. 222 ; possibly if. aegyptium according to Nn., 1896, p. 24, and 1901, p. 255. Explanation of terms and signs used in tlie following diagnoses. L. = the extreme length of the tick. W. = its width at the widest part. {I. and 10. refer to length and width of various structures.) Dorsum = the whole dorsal surface of the body. Mammillae = imnu.te hemispherical or conical protuberances into which the integument is generally raised. Discs =i\ie foveolae, patellae, scutella, pits of other authors, see Figs. 6, 7, 23. Venter = the whole ventral surface of the body. spiracle = the " peritreme " or " stigmal plate " of some authors. vulva = t\xQ genital orifice of the female. grooves = \inei^r depressions. In Fig. 1 note pre-anal groove, post-anal groove and post-anal median groove. /o^o?s = prominent integumental ridges. In Fig. 1 note supra-coxal and coxal folds. earner ostome = the cavity in which the capitulum lies. hood=t\\Q projection of the integument forming the walls of the camerostome. Capitulum = the "rostrum," " head" or " false head " of various authors (Fig. 2). basis capituli or shortly &ase = the basal ring, etc., of most authors. h7/post077ie = th.e "maxiUa," "radula," "labium," or " Unterkiefer " of various authors. The dentition is indicated by figures on either side of a vertical line. Thus 3 | 3 means three longitudinal files of teeth on each half of the hypostome. chelicerae =t'he "mandibles" or " pseudo-chelicerae " of some authors. The terminology usually applied to the portions of the digit of the chelicerae appears to us wrong and confusing, and we prefer to recognise (1) an " internal article," the latter bearing a " dorsal process " which is a portion of it (not articulated), and (2) an "external article" which articulates with the internal article upon its outer side. 1. internal article — " median apophysis " or " immovable finger " of some authors. dorsal jtwoce5s=" internal apophysis" of some authors. 2. external arft'c^e = " external apophysis" or "free" or "movable finger" of some authors. Genus Argas 7 Palps, the pedipalpi, 4-jointed, leg-like appendages on either side of the hypostome. (For details of the capitulum consult Fig. 2.) Legs, six articles, coxa, trochanter, femur, tibia, protarsus and tarsus are always recognisable, and there may be additional " false articulations." Articles 1 and 6 are generally referred to as the coxa and the tarsus respectively, the others being indicated by their numbers. Certain dorsal prominences often present on articles 5 and 6 are referred to as humps or dorsal protuberances. ---eye Supracoocal fold — genital orifice eye coxal fold spiracle median postanal groove preanal grooue- transuerse postanal grooue Fig. 1. Ventral aspect of Ornithodoros coriaceus i with names of parts referred to in the descriptions (Nuttall, 1908, Fig. 2). Palp article 4 Art. 3 -Internal \^f>^^f -External \ofChelicera . hypostome 7^ I ^^^-'- \-—\-St^afl or A Ha TK, J\\ 11 .Chelicera Fig. 2. Capitulum of Argas persiciis s with names of parts referred to in the descriptions (Nuttall, 1908, Fig. 4). 8 (a) (h) (c) (d) (e) Genus Argas l^QY for the determination of species of Argas. (Exclusive of doubtful species q.v. p. 5) [Body circular .... I „ oblong .... [Margin striate .... \ „ with quadrangular " cells " [Body sub-conical in front I „ rounded in front [Dorsum with polygonal depressed areas I „ without „ „ „ 'Body scarcely narrower in front, capitu- lum very small and posterior Body narrower anteriorly, capitulum large and more anterior vespertilionis b persicus d e hrumpti aequalis transgariepinus reflexus PAGE 34 30 33 29 22 ARGAS PERSICUS (Oken) 1818\ Synonymy. Owing to its wide geographical distribution (q.v.) due, it appears to us, to the distribution of its chief host, the domesticated fowl, this species has been given a great many specific names : Rhynchoprion persicum Oken, 1818, p. 1567. Argas persicus Fischer de Waldheim, 1823, p. 269. Argas mauritianus Guerin-Meueville, 1829-43. — Megnin, 1880, p. 134 (only men- tioned). Neumann, 1901, p. 256, examined a dried specimen collected by Desjardins in Mauritius (Paris Mus.) and identified it as A. persicus. Argas miniatus C. L. Koch, 1844, p. 219 ; 1847, p. 32 (PI. I, Fig. 4, legend states it is a (J but text states ^ is unknown. Description insufiicient, specimen from Demerara, Brit. Guiana. Original description translated in Neumann, 1896, p. 24). Neumann, 1901, p. 255, examined the type. Name commonly used by American writers and others, see var. miniatus. Argas americanus Packard, 1872, p. 740, identified with A. miniatus by Neumann, 1901, p. 255. Synonymy explained by Salmon and Stiles (1901, p. 406) : — Ercolani (1859) gave the name A. americanus Latreille to a form which is parasitic in the ears of horses in San Domingo, and Gamgee (1871) did like- wise, consequently the specific name atnericanus has to lapse. Again, Amhlyomma americanum was placed under Rhynchoprion by Hermann (1804), but Rhyncho- prion = Argas. For this reason Railliet (1893, p. 718) gave the tick the name of Argas radiatus (see below). Acarus americanus L. {Acarus nigvM de Geer) 1 The priority for this species has hitherto been given to Fischer de Waldheim. Argas 2)ei^sicus 9 placed under Rhynchoprion by Hermann was probably A mblyomma americanum according to Neumann, 1901, p. 255.— Ward, 1900 b, p. 196. Argas sanchezi Alf. Dug^s, 1891, p. 20 and Neumann, 1896, p. 16. Referred to A. miniatus by Neumann, 1901, p. 255, after seeing the type. This name recurs occasionally in the literature, vide Ward, 1900 b, p. 198. — Banks, 1901, p. 590 ; 1902, p. 568, etc. Argas chinche Goudet, referred to A. miniatus by Neumann, 1901, p. 344 (no reference). Argas radiatus Railliet, 1893, p. 718. Neumann examined Koch's type of A. miniatus and degraded radiatus. Argas miniatus firmatus Neumann, 1896, p. 12, a variety based on 1 $ from Algiers. Argas persicus var. miniatus Neumann, 1905, p. 240. (Neumann finds no constant difference between A. miniatus and the type, and largely because of its distribu- tion retains it as a variety. We see no reason for recognising the variety.) Popular names : "Fowl tick" (America, Australia and Africa), "Adobe tick"' in Arizona and New Mexico. In S. Africa "Wandluis" or "Tampan" (Lounsbury, 1900). In Persia " Miana bug," " Miane bug," " Mialleh de Mianeh," " Garib- guez " or " Guerib-guez," the last name meaning " stranger bug " according to Churchill, 1880, p. xxi (see also Tholozan, 1881, Megnin, 1880, p. 134) ; " M^ll^h " (Dupre, 1819, p. 324), "mall^h" (Fischer de Waldheim, 1823, p. 272) = native name; "punaise de Miana" (Kotzebue, 1819, p. 180), Schlimmer (1874) states it is called "bhebguez" ("Shebgaz," according to Churchill, 1880, p. xxi, meaning " biting at night ") at Chahroude and Bestham. Iconography : Oken, 1818, PI. XIX, Figs. 1-4, notes resemblance to A. rejlexus. He gives sketchy figures of A. persicus ; dorsal and ventral aspects. — Fischer DE Waldheim, 1823, PI. I, Figs. 8-10, shows dorsal aspect with correct distri- bution of the discs ; ventral aspect and capitulum not so good. — Savigny, 1826, PI. IX, Fig. 8, dorsal aspect, very good considering the date when it was drawn. — Gu^RiN-M^NEViLLE, 1829-43, PL VI, Fig. 3, of J. mauritianus dorsal aspect. Fig. 3a part of capitulum. Both figures inaccurate. — Koch, 1847, PI. I, Fig. 4. — KoLLAR- (date?) is stated by Heller, 1858, to have figured the capitulum. — Heller, 1858, Pis. I-IV, deals chiefly with the internal anatomy. — Packard^, 1872, Fig. 68, referred to by Neumann, 1901, p. 255 {A. americanus). — Megnin, 1880, PI. VI, Fig. 3 (poor, A. mauritianus). — Laboulb^ne and Megnin, 1882, Pl. XXI, Figs. 1-10 ; none of them accurate, except that of the capitulum, which is fair. PI. XXIII, Figs. 1, 2, represent the larva and egg. — DuGfes^, 1891, Plate referred to by Neumann, 1901, p. 255 {A. sanchezi). — Marx in Osborne, 1896, PI. Ill, Figs. 3-3 k. Drawings by Marx of A. americanus 9 and larva. — Neumann, 1896, p. 8, Figs. 4, 5, of digit (2 views) and tarsus I ; Figs. 6, 7 {A. americanus), details of integument, 8* anus, 9* digit, 10* hypo- storae, 11 tarsus IV; Figs. 16-21 {A. sanchezi), details of integument, digit, hypostome, tarsus I, larval hypostome and ambulacrum. (Here reproduced, ' "Adobes" are sun-dried bricks used in building houses. ^ Inaccessible. Pohl and Kollar (1823) mention Argasidae. ^ These figures could not be studied, the originals being inaccessible. * Figures marked by a star are reproduced in this work. 10 Genus Argas except Figs. 5, 6, 9, 11, 16, 18 aud 20, which duplicate the others since the species americanns and sanchezi no longer hold.) — Woods \ 1898, Figs. 20a, b, referred to by Salmon and Stiles under bibliography (1901, p. 402) A. americanus. — Hassall, 1899, Coloiu-ed Plate XVI {Argas americanus) of $ , dorsal and ventral aspects : reproduced in Salmon and Stiles (1901). Text Fig. 16, larva (dorsum) ; Fig. 17, ventral view of the larva (otherwise good), omits the coxae ; Figs. 18, 19, larval capitulum ; Figs. 20-22, larval ambulacrum (leg I), drawn like Figs. 16 and 17 from living specimens.— Ward, 1900a, Fig. 2; 1900b, Fig. 260, re- ferred to inSalmon andStiles, 1901, p. 402.— Salmon and Stiles, 1901, A. miniatus, Coloured PI. LXXVIII, 9 , reproduction of Hassall, 1899, PI. XVI. They give a number of excellent text figures, of which those marked by a star are repro- duced by us. Figs. 56, 57, views of chelicera complete. Figs. 71, 72* $ ; 73 portion of the marginal skin ; 74* tarsus I of adult ; 75, anus ; 77, 78*, larva (dorsum and venter) ; 79, larval capitulum (quite as well shown in Fig. 78, but both omit the two hairs on the basis capituli figured by Hassall) ; 80, larval mandibles ; 81, larval Haller's organ.— Lounsbury, 1903, gives a photograph illustrating A. persicus upon a sliver of wood torn from a fowl house ( x 2), and a plate showing the 9 (ventral aspect), the larva (dorsal aspect) and a part of the larval capitulum. He gives Wheler's photograph of the male (dorsum). — Blanchard, reproduced in Neveu-Lemaire, 1904, p. 154, Figs. C and D, are very inaccurate, and appear to be only poor copies from Savigny (1827). The same figure appears in Perroncito (1882 and 1901) and is copied from Perroncito by V. Linstow (1894).— Banks, 1904, Fig. 71, ? venter, poor.— Froggatt, 1906, Figs. 1 and 2, showing Argas in crevices of splintered wood, and mouth-parts of tick.— Wheler, 1906, Fig. 39* the S, dorsum.— Donitz, 1907, PL II, Figs. 9, 10$, 13, 14 larval leg. — Reaney, 1907, p. 401, two very bad figures of larva and female.^MANSON, 1908, PI. IV, coloured figure of adult (0 dorsum. — Nuttall, 1908, Fig. 4 ^ capitulum*.— Banks, 1908, PI. I, Figs. 1, 2, legs 1 and 4. Literature. Papers marked " 0 " contain no original matter or only make casual mention of ^. persicus. 1818. Oken, pp. 1567-1570.-1819. DuPRifi, p. 323, refers to efiects of bite. Passage quoted in Fischer de Waldheim, 1823, p. 272.— Kotzebue, pp. 180, 194, rough description, fully quoted in Fischer de Waldheim, 1823, pp. 272- 274. Dwells on effect of bites on man.— 1821. Porter^. — 1823. Fischer de Waldheim, pp. 269-273, gives brief description, dwells especially on effect of bite.— 1828. Szovits^.- 1829. Latreille, b, p. 289. 0.-1829-43. Gu^rin- Mi^NEViLLE, p. 17, only refers to plate and habitat {A. mauritianus). — 1833. CuviER, cited by George, 1876, p. 224, as referring to A. persiciis. — 1844. DuGfes, cited by Laboulbfene and Megnin, 1882. — Koch, C. L., p. 219. A. miniatus, described in 18 words. — Walkenaer, p. 232. Also cited by Heller, 1858, p. 297. Passage translated in Churchill, 1880a.— 1847. Koch, C. L., p. 12. A. miniatus. 0.-1849. Lucas, H., p. 317. 0.-1855. Kuchen- ^ These figures could not be studied, the original being inaccessible. * Figures marked by a star are reproduced in this work. 2 Cited in bibliography by Huber, 1899. A. persiciis 11 MEISTER, p. 423. O.— 1858. Heller, C, pp. 297-326. Distinguished the sexes and describes and figures the $ and $ genital orifice. Spiracle between legs 3, 4. Heller gives the first detailed study of the internal anatomy. — Kollar, cited by Heller, 1858, p. 297, as giving first description and figure of capitulum. —1862. HusEMANN, p. 248.— 1863. Gerstaecker, C. E. A., p. 344. 0.— 1867. Laboulb^ne, A., p. 54, obviously compiled from Fischer de Waldheim, 1823 iq.v.). — 1872. Packard, pp. 740, 741 {A. americana), cited by Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 402.-1873. Fomouze, inaccessible i. — 1874. Schlimmer, cited in Nuttall, 1899, p. 46. Notes occurrence in different parts of Persia and records effects of bite. — Spicer, p. 209, quotes Walkenaer, 1844. — Taschenberg, p. 171.-1875. Fritsch, p. 61 1.— 1877. Packard in Murray, p. 182 {A. ameri- canus). — 1880. Churchill, S., p. xx, cites older authors and adds a few observations of his own. — Ernodf, p. 256 1. — M^gnin, P., p. 134. More fully dealt with in Laboulbfene and Megnin, 1882. — Goudet, J., cited by Megnin (1880) as having described and figured "^. americamcs de Geer" and that it looked like an Argas (see synonymy) = " chinche " or "nigua" in Colombia. Megnin (1892, p. 67) thinks it must be 0. talaje. — 1881. Tholozan. See Laboulbfene, 1881.— Laboulb^ne, A., (27, vii). Report from Tholozan. Cited in full in Laboulbfene and Megnin, 1882, p. 327.— 1882. Bordier, p. 131, cited by Nuttall, 1899, p. 47.— Cobbold, p. 77. — LABouLBfeNE and Megnin, p. 327, deal at length with A. persicus, very diffuse, omit many essentials but describe development and sexes. — Perroncito, p. 450. 0. — Tholozan, p. 15 1. — 1885. MEGNIN, p. 460 {A. americanus)'^. — 1890. Blanchard, ii, p. 883 et seq. — 1892. Marx, p. 234 {A. mnericanus)'^. — 1893. Hoehr, p. 348 {A. americamisY. — Railliet, p. 718 {A. radiatus). — Riley and Howard, p. 267 {A. americana, also A. americanus)^. — Webster, p. 149 {A. americanusY, inaccessible. — 1894. Francis, p. 452 {Argus americanusy.—w. Linstow, p. 120. 0. — 1895. Braun, p. 258. 0. — Howard, p. 41 7 {A. americanus) 2. — Lounsbury, p. 657.— Marx, p. 199 {A. amet-icafms)^.— Riley and Howard. — Packard, p. 417. — 1896. Dubreuilh and Beille, p. 79. O. — Fuller, p. 593. General description of fowl tick. — Neumann, pp. 9-12, 24, 25 (A. americanus). — Osborn, H., p. 256, quotes Packard's description verbatim (A. americanus). — 1898. Woods, p. 102 {A. amei-icanus)'^. — 1899. Hart, p. 180 {A. amei-icamis) in Trinidad. — Hassall, pp. 496-500 {A. americanus). — Lounsbury, repr. A fuller account in his publication of 1903. — Marlatt, C. L. (11, viii). O. — Morgan, p. 137 {A. americanus)'^. — Nuttall, pp. 46, 47, cites older literature regarding effects of bite. — Taschenberg, 1900, p. 738. 0.— Utility, p. 185, inaccessible^.— 1900. Ward, H. B., p. 197, quotes Packard's description; mentions "J. sanchezV as another species. — Ward, H. B., p. 437 {A. americanus). — 1901. Froggatt, p. 1349, inaccessible, cited in Hunter and Hooker's Bibliogr. — Neumann, pj). 255, 256. — Perroncito, p. 561. 0. — Salmon and Stiles, pp. 402-406, give a very full description {A. miniatus), which we have utilized in part. — 1902. Brown, p. 86, cited by Lounsbury, 1903, p. 6, re oviposition. — 1903. Lounsbury, pp. 1-15, gives a very good description of the different stages and the biology. (Cited in text.) — MARCHOUXand Salimbeni, p. 569. Regarding spirillosis in fowls. — 1904. Banks, ' Cited in bibliography by Huber, 1899. ' Cited in bibliography by Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 402. 12 Genus Argas p. 331. 0. Described as "^. miniata." — Lounsbury (November. Repr., brief mention), see Lounsbury, 1903. — Mosler and Peiper, p. 346. 0. — Neveu- Lemaire, p. 154. 0. — 1905. Borrel and Marchoux, p. 362. Regarding spirillosis in fowl. — Neumann, p. 240.— Nuttall, p. 22. 0. — Robertson, p. 561, quoted by Hunter and Hooker, 1907.— 1906. Braun, p. 371. 0.— Froggatt, pp. 14-18 ; gives general account of life historj' and habits ; measures for tick destruction in infested fowl houses {A. americanus). — 1907. Donitz, W., p. 27. — Hunter and Hooker, p. 71. Reaney, p. 401.— 1908. Hooker, a, p. 39. — Manson, p. 204. 0. — Nuttall, p. 394 et seq. — Banks, p. 15. (Not " Ai-gas americanus Latreille " of Ercolani, 1859, p. 248; Gamgee, 1871, p. 219. Not " Argas americanus De Geer" of Megnin, 1880, p, 134. (Megnin thought it an Argas from a figure published by J. Goudet; no reference.) Acarus americanus see Amhlyomma ameri- canum. Dolly, 1894, p. 980. From Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 402.) With the exception of a few unimportant papers all of the above have been consulted in the original. Specific Description. (Refer to Figs. 2—26, PI. I, Fig. 3.) Adults : — Body ovate or quite oval, widest towards the posterior end. Margin (150-200 fx wide), composed of quadrangular units or " cells," each enclosing a circular pit. Discs numerous, oval or round, arranged as shown in figures 3, 4. Venter : anus nearly central, with smooth anal ring ; spiracles small (125 /a) crescentic, equal to about half the width of the anal ring; genital opening between coxae I and II \ Capitulum: base ventrally with four long hairs directed forwards, two post-hypostomal, one near the articulation of each palp (post-palpal). Palps about twice as long as hypostome, second article longest, the others equal in length. Chelicerae (see Figs. 15 a and h). Hypostome indented, 6 or 7 fine denticles on each half distally, followed by stout teeth 2 | 2, the numbers of teeth increasing to 3 | 3, 4 | 4, 5 | 5 basally, the teeth decreasing in size, not attaining the external border nor extending beyond half the length of the hypostome. Legs : sub-equal and similar ; coxa I distinctly separated from coxa II in $ ; coxae II, III and IV contiguous; article 3 the longest ; articles 3 and 4 broader distally ; tarsi with very slight dorsal protuberance. The above description applies to both sexes, which differ chiefly in the slightly smaller size of the ^ — which is slightly narrower in front (ovate, PI. I, Fig. 3) — and in the appearance of the genital orifice (Figs. 11, 12). The latter is slit-like and broader than the capitulum 1 See Figs. 11, 12. In gravid ? it may be more anterior, as in Fig. 4. A. persicus 13 immediately behind which it lies in the % (it is situate between coxae II according to Laboulbene and Megnin, 1882, p. 333). In the digits, palp, integument, tarsus ; larva (showing intes- tinal caeca apparently passing into the legs), the ovum. — Blanchard, 1890. —Neumann, 1896, p. 38, Fig. 35*. — Dubreuilh and Beille, 1896, p. 80, Fig. 8 (copied from Laboulbene and Megnin). — Braun, 1906, p. 373. O. {Argas papilUpes Birula, 1895, pp. 38-44, Fig. 35 ; digits of J and $ ; referred here by Neumann, 1901, p. 259. See 0. papilUpes, p. 79.) Native name: "Kene"or "sheep bug" in Persia (Laboulbfene and Megnin, 1882, p. 329). Adults : Body (the (/ varies from 4x2 mm. to 6 x 4 mm. ; the % from 8x4 mm. to 10x5 mm.), with lateral borders nearly straight and parallel, tapering abruptly, but sinuously, to a rounded process in front, and broadly rounded behind; a broad margin is marked off from the rest of the dorsum by a well-defined marginal groove. Integument coarsely shagreened, then, with numerous short hairs, longer and more apparent anteriorly; hemispherical granulations 40 — 60 jj, in diameter ; giving the effect of a network of meshes limited by creased folds ; one mesh out of every 5 or 10 bears a long hair. Discs similar to those of 0. erraticus, but relatively smaller; seven on the anterior median prominence arranged in three rows (3, 2, 2), surrounded by an irregular circle of similar discs whence a median row starts posteriorly, double at its origin and reaching the posterior border. A short row on each side, and other scattered discs. On the ventral surface discs occupy the depressions and grooves. No eyes. Venter: pre-anal groove deep, concave behind; post-anal groove nearly straight; median post-anal groove nearly reaching the posterior border; sexual orifice in ^ and $ between coxae II ; anal frame wider than long (300 X 350 /Lt); anus with seven or eight long hairs on each side. Spiracles (350 yu,), crescentic. Capitulum : palps tapering, and not much longer than the hypostome; chelicerae (digits. Figs. 93, 94). The hypostome differs in the sexes: in the f^, it is somewhat spatulate and indented, a crown of small teeth being followed by two rows of three teeth on each side, the middle rows not ftir apart ; then three or four rows of simple squamiform teeth ; in the $ , it is somewhat lanceolate, and the dentition 66 Genus Ornitliodoros is 2 I 2 throughout, the median rows being far apart. Four long hairs (post-hypostoraal and post-palpal) on the base of the capitulum, as in 0. avignyi. Legs fairly long and slender; coxae II — IV contiguous ; tarsi 2 — 4 with terminal dorsal protuberance prominent, pointed and directed distally, the terminal portion tapering. Short hairs on all articles, longest on the tarsi. Fig. 93. Figs. 93 and 94. O. tholozani. Left digits of d. The tick, once infected, may harbour the parasite for months and transmit it when it has occasion to feed. Finally, MoUers (1907, p. 277) finds that the spirochaete is transmitted to the third generation of ticks, the second generation having been fed on blood free from spirochaetes; such ticks may infect animals (rats, monkeys) by their bites. Filariasis in Man: Christy (1903, p. 187) considered that 0. monhata is capable of transmitting Filaria perstans to man. In this disease the filarial embryos circulate in the blood. Feldmann (190.5, p. 64), whose statements have been criticised by Kerr (1905, p. 126), advanced the extraordinary hypothesis that the ticks infected with filariae lay their eggs in bananas stored in native huts and in some way give off the worms which are eaten with the bananas by the natives. Wellman (1907 and MS.) states that he has observed a certain degree of development of F. perstans embryos in moubata. His results are very suggestive, since he worked with moubata which he raised from the egg. The matter requires further investigation. Spirochaetosis in Foiuls. It is interesting to note that Fiilleborn and Mayer (1908, p. 31) have found that they could transmit Spirochaeta marchouxi (see p. 88) by means of 0. moubata in experiments con- ducted in Hamburg. In the positive experiments which they report, the ticks had fed twice before upon infected fowls. The ticks were infective for 103 days after feeding on a fowl harbouring the spirochaetes in its blood. Brumpt (1901, p. 578) observed that the parasites of tertian malaria degenerated inside the gut of moubata and ticks fed on himself after feeding on malarial blood produced no ill effects. 1 Massey(1905, p. 225) and Wellman (1905, p. 97) also observed the spirochaetes in Angola. The epidemiology and history of the disease in German E. Africa are discussed by Werner (1906, p. 776). 102 Biology ORNITHODOROS CORIACEUS. Effects of bite and feeding habits : two females bit Mrs Z. Nuttall through her clothing and inflicted painful wounds, " their bites were intolerably sharp and painful, and both wounds bled a good deal — but notwithstanding, there has been intermittent irritation ever since" (this persisted after 4 months, and the seat of the bite was still dis- coloured and the puncture covered by a scab). Eight months after the bite was inflicted there remained a nodule which occasionally itched. The natives of Tehuantepec, Mexico, fear this tick for the reason that the bites are severe and often do not heal for a long time. The females immediately proceeded to feed, on arrival in Cambridge, when placed upon a fowl. They fed for 45 minutes and 1 hour 40 minutes respectively, and drew a large amount of blood. The bites caused intense ecchymosis, measuring about one inch in diameter. Whilst feeding the palps did not penetrate the wound as once observed in the case of 0. savignyi, but both specimens exuded clear fluid as observed in 0. moubata. ORNITHODOROS TURICATA. Effects of bite : the " turicata," as the Mexicans call it, may cause serious injury by its bite. According to Duges (1876) it has been known to be fatal to pigs. This author also states that chickens fed on turicatas died about the third day. The effect of the bite in man is especially bad if the turicata's capitulum is torn off, and, where this occurs, Duges recommends the use of the cautery, otherwise it causes severe itching, and an ulcer forms at the spot bitten, and this may persist for months, or there may develop erysipelatoid dermatitis, lymphangitis, the formation of bullae containing serum about the puncture, at times gangrene, subcutaneous abscesses, etc. In three cases he reports general symptoms following the bite. In two of these a vein had been punctured by a turicata. One patient had difficulty in speaking and swallowing, swelling and numbness spreading over the whole body, accompanied by vomiting and diarrhoea. In another patient all these symptoms subsided within an hour, when an urticaria made its appearance, accompanied by profuse perspiration. Duges says people are reported as having died from the bites of turicatas, the noxious effects of which he attributes to a venom, a peculiar idiosyncrasy existing in certain individuals. Biology ' 103 ORNITHODOROS TALAJE. Habitat, Effect of bite, etc. : Salle (1849, p. 342) and his companion, Jules, were severely bitten by 0. talaje in May, 1847, at Casa Vieja de Gastoya. They were awakened out of sound sleep by "atrocious itching on the hands and face," and on lighting a candle found their hands were " covered with blood and blotches like large bites of bugs." The mule- teer said the bites were due to "talajas." The ticks infest old houses, retreating into the crevices of the walls, which are built of bamboo and covered with mortar. The talajas bite at night and disappear by morning. Salle states "my hands and ears were much swollen, and I suffered horribly " ; a fortnight elapsed before he recovered from the effects. 0. talaje, according to Guerin-Meneville (1849), causes intoler- able itching and pain by its bite. Megnin (1885) says its saliva may be venomous like that of a mosquito or tarantula. This stands in direct contradiction to his previously expressed views regarding A. persicus (q.v.). ORNITHODOROS THOLOZANI. Effects of bite: Megnin (1882, and 1892, p. 66) claimed that the bite of this tick is harmless. He allowed one which had starved for years to bite his hand. It sucked itself full in about half an hour, the pain produced being less than that of a leech. The only effect was the formation of a violet ecchymosis 6 mm. in diameter about the bite. As Johannessen (1885, p. 347) very properly remarks, one experiment by Megnin (in France) with a tick which had been kept starving for years, has no value as proving that its bite is innocuous under normal conditions. ORNITHODOROS MEGNINI. The life history of this species has been recently studied by Hooker (1908 a, pp. 40, 42, 45, 51) who placed bags over the ears of infested cattle and safeguarded the bags by cords tied about the horns so as to prevent their being displaced. The larvae, having gained entrance to the ear of the host, attach themselves deep down in the folds of the skin and gorge themselves. They moult upon the host after about 5 days and the nymphs continue feeding sometimes for months. In one case a nymph abandoned the host's ear 35 days after the larva had been 104 Biology introduced, in other cases the nymphs still remained attached after 98 days had elapsed. "After leaving the ears as nymphs, these ticks usually crawl up several feet from the ground and secrete themselves in cracks and crevices, where in about 7 days in September, after leaving the ear, they shed a membranous skin and appear as adults without spines." Fertilization then takes place and oviposition commences, after which the female dies. Eggs are not laid by unfertilized females and the latter may live a long time. In summer the larvae hatch out after 11 days. As far as we know the life history of megnini is unique amongst the Ixodoidea since but one moult (larva to nymph) takes place upon the host and the nymph stores up enough food to make it unnecessary for the adult to feed before fertilization and oviposition take place. Hooker believes that the adults probably never feed, and we would note that this view gains support from the fact that the adult capitulum (Fig. 103) is very small and that the hypostome (see p. 73) is unarmed, no similar structure being known to us in other ticks. Even the structure of the digit appears modified in that the external article does not bear the usual outwardly directed teeth (see Fig. 104, digit of female). The peculiar habit of the replete nymph of creeping upward several feet from the ground before moulting appears to Hooker to be correlated with the tick's parasitic habits, for when the adults mate and the females oviposit, the larvae which issue from the eggs are placed in an advantageous position where they can readily gain access to the ears of their hosts. Injurious Effects: Salmon and Stiles (1901, pp. 413, 414) write: "Judging from letters received by this bureau (The Bureau of Animal Industry, Washington, D.C.), the ear tick is accused of causing a variety of troubles. Some correspondents report sickness and even death among cattle as having been caused by the parasite, while others are not inclined to attach so much importance to its presence. Owing to their position in the ear, it is not possible to use any very drastic measures against them, but, as a rule, if any bland oil, such as linseed or olive oil, is poured into the ear, the ticks will soon vacate ; they are not killed by this treatment, hence every tick caught should be crushed in order to prevent increase." Simpson (1901) readily removed a nymph from the ear of a gentleman by introducing a pledget of cotton containing a little chloroform into the ear. Longevity {unfed): Megnin (1885) states that he kept some 0. megnini alive unfed for two years. BIBLIOGRAPHY The titles (about 300) given in the following bibliography refer to the Argasidae. Throughout the book the Harvard System of References to the bibliography has been adopted. Wherever an author has been cited in the text the date of publication (and usually the page) has been added in brackets. In the following bibliography the names of the authors are given in alphabetical order, the names being followed by the date of publication, the title of the paper and the Journal, etc. where the paper was published. The Roman numerals after the name of the Journal or book indicate the number of the volume, and the figures printed in ordinary type refer to the page. In some cases a short comment upon the contents of the publication accompanies the reference. Unless otherwise stated the quotations are from the original papers. Aclogue, A. (1905), Les Argas. Le Cosmos, N.S., Liii. 536 (inaccessible). Agassiz, L. (1846), Nomendatoris zoologici Index Universalis, continens nomina systematica dassium, ordimtm, familiarum et genermn animalium omnium, tam viventium quam fossilmm, secundum ordinem alphabeticum unicum disposita adjectis homonymiis plantarum, nee nan variis adnotationihvjS et emendationibus, pp. viii + 393, 4°, Soloduri. (Only lists genera : Argas, Ixodes, etc.) Ajutolo, G. d' (1898), Nuovi casi di Argas rejlexus parassita dell' uomo. Rend. Accad. 1st. Bologna, ii. 222-223. Alt, K. (1892a), Die Taubenzecke als Parasit des Menschen. Miinchen. med. Wochenschr., xxxix. 531-533, 2 Figs. (Cited by Nuttall, 1899, p. 45, A. rejlexus.) (1892b), Die Taubenzecke als Parasit des Menschen. Thiermed. Rundschau, Halle a. S., vi. 265-269. (1 Sept. ; A. rejlexus.) (1893), Die Taubenzecke als Parasit des Menschen. Centralhl. f. BacterioL, XIV. 468. (Rev. by Kniippel.) Audouin, J. V. (1827), Description de I'Egypte, ou recueil des observations et des recherches qui ont ete faites en figypte pendant I'expedition de I'armee frangaise, public par les ordres de sa majeste I'empereur Napoleon le Grand, ed. 2, xxii. Zoologie. (1832), Lettres pour servir de raateriaux h, I'histoire des Insectes. Premiere Lettre, contenant des Recherches sur quelques Araignees parasites des genres Pte'ropte, Carls, Argas, et Ixode, adx'essee a M. Leon Dufour. Ann. d. set. nat., Paris, XXV. 401^425, Pis. IX, Figs. 8-10 ; XIV, Figs. 1-4. (Argasidae and Ixodidae.) 4 I Bihliograpliif s Austen, E. E. (1906), An insect enemy of the disseminator of human tick fever in Angola. Jouni. Trop. Med., Lond., ix. 113. (Describes Phoneryates bicoloripes, sent by Welhnan.) Banks, N. (1901a), Acarina in "Some Spiders and other Arachnida from Southern Arizona." Proc. U.S. Nat. Museiim, xxiii. 590. {A. persicus and Ixodes sp. not identified.) (1901b), Some Arachnida from New Mexico. Proc. Acad. Nat. Set., Phil- adelphia, Liii. 568-597. {A. persicus found at Deming.) (1902b), Papers from the Hopkins-Stanford Galapagos Expedition, 1898-1899, vol. VII., Entomological Results (6), The Arachnida. Proc. Wash. Acad. Set., IV. 70, PI. II, Fig. 9. {Argas transversa, n.sp., and mention of Amhlyomma pilosum Nn. both at Albemarle Island.) (1904a), Some Arachnida of California. Proc. California Acad. Sci. (3), in. 331-376, PI. XLI, Fig. 57 (Zoology). (1904 b), A treatise on the Acarina or Mites. Proc. U.S. National Mus., xxviii. 1-114, 201 text-figs. (Ticks : pp. 42-49, Figs. 71-85.) (1907), A catalogue of the Acarina, or Mites, of the United States. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., xxxii. 595-625. (1908), A revision of the Ixodoidea, or Ticks of the United States. U.S. Bep't of Agricult., Bureau of Entomology, Technical Series No. 15. GO pp., 10 Plates. Washington D.G. (issued 6. vi. 1908). van Beneden, P. J. (1883), Animal Parasites and Messmates. 3rd ed., 83 Figs., 274 pp. London : Kegan Paul, Trench and Co. (brief mention of Ticks). Berlese, A. (1885), Acarorum systematis specimen. Boll, della Soc. Ent. Italiana, XVII. 121-144. (1888), Acari Austro-Americani. Bollettino della Soc. Entom. Italiana, xx. 193. (1888-1892), Acari, Mi/7-iopoda et Scorpiones hucusciue in Italia reperta. Padua [Re Ticks : see Fasciculi 47 and 49 (1888), 55 (1889), 58 (1891), 61 (1892).] (1889), Acari africani tres illustrati. Atti d. Soc. veneto-trentina di sc. naturali, X. 289-300, PI. VII, Figs. 2-4. Bianconi, G. A. (1867), Sul Rhynchoprion columbae Herm. o Argas reflexus Latr. con una Tavola. Mem. dell' Accad. d. sc. deW Istituto di Bologna (2), vii. 107- 112, 1 PI. Birula, A. (1894 and 1895), Ixodidae novi vel parum cogniti Musei Zoologici Academiae Cacsareae Scientiarum Petropolitanae. i. Bull, de V Acad. Imp. des Sc. de St Petersbourg, ser. 5, ii. (4), April, p[). 353-364, Pis. I, II. Blanchard, R. ( ), "Parasites Animaux" in Bouchard's Traite de Pathol. Gene'rale, vol. ii. Paris. (1890), Traite de la Zoologie mcdicale, ll. 883, Figs. 388-883. (Refers to different Argasidae.) Bocquillons ( ), Storia med. fra gli Aracnidi, p. 113. Cited by Bianconi, 1867, p. 107. (Casual reference to Argas reflexus.) Bordier, A. (1882), L'argas persicus. Journ. de Therapeutique, ix. 131-133. (Cited by Nuttall, 1899, p. 47.) 8*— 2 Bihliography 5 Borrel and Marchoux (1905), Argas et spirilles. Compt. rend. Soc. hiol., lviii. 362- 3(i 4. (J. fiersicus.) Boschnlte (1860), Argas re/lexm, sds Para.sit an iMenschen. Virchoio's Archiv, xviii. 5r)4^r);j(j. (Cited by Nuttall, 1899, p. 44.) (1879), Ueber den Argas re/lextix. Virchotv's Archiv, Lxxv. 5G2. (Cited by Nuttall, 1899, p. 40.) Brandes, G. (1892a), Ueber die Arga.sidae. S.B. Ver. Sachs. Thiir, pp. 17 and 22. (Cit. Zool. Record, 1892.) (1892 b), Ueber die Familie der Zecken. Ber. ii. d. Sitzungen d. naturforsch. GescUseh. zu lialU im Jahre 1892, 8-11. (1897), Argas refiexxis als gelegentlicher Parasit des Menschcn. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. m. Parasitenk., xxii. 747-752. Braun, M. (1883), Die thierischen Parasiten des Menschen nehst einer Anleitung zur praktisehen Beschaftigung mit der Helminthologie fiir Studirende mid Aerzte, pp. i-viii + 1-233, Figs. 72. (See Braun, 1895.) (1895), Die thierische^i Parasiten des Menschen: ein Handhuch fiir Studirende und Aerzte, Wurzburg, ed. 2, pp. 283, Text-Fig.s. 147. {Ixodidae, see pp. 257- 259, Figs. 127-130, none original.) (XI. 1906), The Animal Parasites of Man. London : John Bale, Sons and Danielsson, Ltd., 3rd edition, 453 pp., 294 illustrations in text. 26x17 cm. (Ticks, pp. 360-374, Figs. 236-239, none original and all poor. Numerous mistakes.) Brown, A. A. (1902), "Fowl Tick {Argas miniatus).'" Journ. Dep. Agric. Victoria, I. 86-9U and 209-212. (Inaccessible ; cited by Lounsbury, 1903, p. 6.) Brumpt, E. (1901), Notes et observations sur les maladies parasitaires. Arch, de Parasitol., iv. 561-580. (p. 578 re effects of bites of 0. mouhata.) Caiman, W. T. (15. IV. 1905), Omithodoros savignyi var. caecum [should be caecus']. Journ. Tropical Medicine, viii. (8) 124. {0. moubata.) Canestrini, G. (1890), Prospetto delV Acarofa^ma italiana ; Famiglie: Tetranychini, Lvodini, Argasini, iv. 427-540, Tav. xxxvii.-XLiii. Padova. (1892a), Prosjoe^to delV Acarofauna italiana ; Intorno alia metamorfosi degli Ixodini (Nota). Abbozzo del sistema acarologico ; Famiglia dei Phytoptini (Phytoptidae), v. 543-722, Tav. xliv.-lix. Padova. Canestrini, G., and Fanzago, F. (1877), Intorno agli acari Italiani. Atti del reale Istituto Venetu di scienze, lettcre ed arti, ser. 5, iv. (1877-78) (1 [for Nov., 1877]), 69-208, Tav. ii.-vii. (Reprint paged 1-140, citations made from the latter.) Chatelin (1882), [Effects of bite of A. reflexus on man]. Soc. Entomol. de France, Seance du 24. v. 1882. (Cited by Laboulbene and MegTiin, 1882, p. 340, and Railliet, 1895, p. 717.) Christophers, S. R. (1906), The Anatomy and Histology of Ticks. Scientific Memoirs by Officers of the Med. and Sanit. Depots of the Gov't of India, Calcutta, N.S., No. 23, Pis. I-VI, 55 pp. Christy, C (1903), "Tick Fever" in Man. (Including a note by R. I. Pocock.) Brit. Med. Journ., ii. 653 ; also appeared in Thompson and Johnston Laboratories Report, V. 187-189, PI. XV. BUMof/raphy 7 Churchill, S. (1880 a), Note on Argas persicus. Proc. Entom. Soc. Land., pp. xx -xxiii. Glaus, C. (1880), GrundzUge der Zoologle, i. 821, 8", Marburg. (1887), Lehrhuch der Znnlogw, 4te Aufl. Marburg and Leipzig : N. G. Elwert. [pp. 470-474 give a brief description of cliief features of Ixodes and rei)i'oduce three figures from Pagonsteclier (1860, 1861) : Irodes ria'nus, general internal anatomy (Fig. 443); Argtts, $ and (^ sexual organs (Fig. 444); I.vodcs, rostrum (Fig. 450).] Cobbold, T. S. (1879), Parasites; a treatise on the Entozoa of man and animals, ineliiding some account of the Ectozoa. Pp. xi + 508, figs. 85, London. (1882), Human parasites. A manual of reference to all the Icnoirn species of Entozoa and Ectozoa luhich are fotind infesting man. 88 i)p. London : Longmans, Green and Co. (Brief mention of ticks on pp. 77, 78.) Cook, A. R. (1904), Relapsing fever in Uganda. Journ. Trop. Med., 15 .Ian., p. 24. (Epidemics of the disease in Budu and Mengo (Uganda), in 1903, found spiro- chaetes in the blood of patients : he observed the disease in 1899, at Mengo.) Cuvier, G. (1833), Arachnidae, with additions by Grifhths and Pigeon. (Cited by (xeorge, 1876, p. 224, as referring to Argas persicus and .1. pipistrellae (last figured). See Dugfes and Edwards (no date).) Dolly, C. (1894), Synonymatic table of the animal parasites of man and of the animals commonly associated with him. An illustrated dictionary/ of medicine, biology, and allied sciences, etc., by George M. Gould. Philadelphia, pp. 978- 1021, Figs. (Cited by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Donitz, W. (1906), Ueber Afrikanische Zecken. Sitzungsber. d. Gesellsch. Naturfor- schender Freunde, Jahrg. 1906, No. 5, pp. 143-148, 8 Figs., reprint. (1907), Die wirtschaftlich wichtigen Zecken mit besonderer Beritchichtigung AfriJcas. 127 pp., 38 Figs, and 6 Plates. Leipzig: J. A. Barth. (IX. 1907), Insekten als Verbreiter von Krankheiten : Die Zecken. Ber. ii. d. XIV. Internat. Kongr.f. Hygiene u. Demogr., Berlin 23-29 Sept., 1907, ii. 179-188. Dowson, J. (1. VI. 1895), Poisonous tick. Brit. Med. Journ., i. 1201. (Followed by a short note by R. I. Pocock.) Dubreuilh, W. (1900), " Demiatozoaires" in Pratique dermatologique. T. r., 8", Paris : Masson. Dubreuilh, W., and Beille, L. (1896), Les parasites de la peau humaine. 185 pp., 22 text-figs. Paris : Masson et Cie. (Date taken from Huber, 1899, p. 15 ; original undated ; ticks referred to pp. 68-84, Figs. 4-8.) Du Buysson (1896), Observations sur les accidents produits par la piqilre des Acariens du genre Argas. Ann. Soc. Entomol., 10 pp. (Cited by Huber, 1899, p. 15.) Dug^S, A. (1876), Repertorio de Guanajuato, Mexico. (Cited by Megnin, 1885, pj). 463, 466, etc., who gives translated extracts and reports on subsequent personal communications received from Duges and Aleman. Also cited by Neumann, 1892, Malad. Parasit., p. 101.) (1883), Naturaleza de Mexico, v. 195. (Cited by Megnin, 1885, pp. 465, 472, who gives a figure of A. megnini Dugfes. Cited by Neumann, 1896, p. 16.) — — (1884), Turicata y garrapata de Guanajuato. La Naturaleza, Periodica cient'ifico de la Sociedad Mcvicana de Historia natural, vi. (1882-1884), Mexico, pp. 195-198, PI. IV. (MS. dated Nov., 1882.) Bihliof/raphy 9 Dugds, A. (1891), La Naturaleza (2), i. 20, 1 PI. (Cited by Neumann, 1896.) Dug^S, A. L. (1834a), Recherches sur I'ordre des Acariens en general et la famille dcs Tvonibidics en particulier ; Premiere memoire. Ann. de sci. nat.^ Paris, s^r. 2, I. ZooL, pp. 5-46, PI. I. (Reprint paged 1-42.) (1834 c), Recherclies sur Pordre des Acariens ; Troisi^'nie mdmoire. Remarques sur la famille des Gamases. Ann. de nci. nat., Paris, ser. 2, ii. Zool., pp. 18-63, Pis. VII, VIII. (Reprint paged 1-44.) (1836), Recherches sur I'ordre des Acariens en general (i) et la ffimille des Trombidies en particulier (ii). Remarques sur la famille des Hydracnes (iii). Ann. des Sc. nat., 2*= ser., Zool. T. i., reprint i)p. 42, PI. I (i. Memoire) ; ibid. pp. 30, Pis. X, XI (II. Mem.) ; ibid., vol. il. pp. 46, Pis. VII and VIII. Dug^S, A. L., and Milne Edwards (no date), " Arachnides " in La lUgne Animal, by G. Cuvier. Paris: Masson. (Figs, illustr. Ixodoidea on PI. XXVII.) Duprd (1819), Voyage en Per so fait dans les annees 1807, 1808 et 1809, il. 324. Paris. (Lengthy quotations of essential parts in Fischer de Waldheim (1823), Laboulb^ne (1867), and Laboulbtjne and Mc'gnin (1882) : A. persicus.) Button, J. E., and Todd, J. L. (XI. 1905), The Nature of Human Tick-Fever in the Eastern part of the Congo Free State (dated 28. iii. 1905). Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine — Memoir xvii., 18 pp., 9 Charts ; see also Brit. Med. Jonrn., II, 1259, 1260. Efisio, M. (1892), Saggio d' un catalogo metodico dei principali e piti comuni animali invertebrati della Sardegna. Bollettino della Societd Romana per gli studi Zoologica, I. (6), 246-282. (Cited by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Ellison, A. (1903a), Birds killed by ticks. Zoologist, Lond. (743), 4. s. (77), v. 7, May 15, p. 194. (Refers to midges, no word of ticks !) Ercolani, G. B. (1859), Nihovi elementi teorico-pratid di medicina veterinaria; Dei parassiti dei morbi parassitarii degli animali domestici, pp. 550, Bologna. (Cited in bibl. by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Ernouf, Baron (1880), Le Caucase, la Perse, etc., cPapres les relations de M. de Thielmann, p. 256. Paris, 1880. {A. persicus, cit. Huber, 1899, p. 16.) Fabricius, J. C (1794), Eritomologia systematica, emendata et axLcta, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species adjectis synonyniis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus, IV. pp. 472 + index, pp. 5, Hafniae. (Ticks : see pp. 425-434.) (1805), Sy sterna antliatorum secundum ordhies, genera, species adjectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus, pp. xiv + 15-372 + 30, \2°, Brunsvigae. Fanzago. See Canestrini and Fanzago. Feldmann (1905a), Ueber Filana perstans im Bezirk Bukoba. ii. Theil mit 1 Tafel. Arch. f. Sckijfs- u,. Tropen-Hygiene, IX. (2), 62-65. (1905b), On Filaria perstans in the Bukota District. (Transl. by T. S. Kerr of the preceding : Feldmann, 1905 a.) Journ. Tropical Medicine, viii. (8), 125- 126. (Should be " Feldmann " and " Bukoba.") Fischer de Waldheim, G. (1823), Notice sur I'Argas de Perse (Mallfeh de Mianfeh) decrit par les voyageurs sous le nom de punaise venimeuse de Miana. Mem. Soc. imp. de nat. de Moscou, vi. 269-283, PI. XXIII, Figs. 1-11. (Figs. 1, 2 Lv. camelinus, 3-7 Ix. ricinus, 8-11 Argas persicus, Fischer n.sp. Gives an account of known species of ticks, quoting other authors.) BihliodmpJni 11 Fischer de Waldheim, G. (1824), T)u Mallah do Miana, insoctc dc Perwe, dit punaise veiiimcusc (Abstract of Fischer von Waldhcini, 1828, by J. J. Virey.) .hmrn. de pharm., Paris, v. 10 (5), Mai, pp. 2-42-24.'). (Note by Latreille, p. 245.) Fischer, H. (1849). See Gene, 1849. Francis, M. (1894), Veterinary Science. Bidl. Xo. 30, Texas Agn'c. Exp. Sta., March, pp. 486 458, Pis. I-III, (Cited by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Fritsch, G. (1875), Ueber die sogen. " (xiftwanze von Mianah." Sitzungsher. d. Ucnelhch. natiirf. Freunde zn Berlin., pp. 01-64. {A. per/sictis, cit. Huber, 1899, p. 16.) Froggatt, W. W. (1901), The fowl tick {Argus 1 )•(/('.?" in Dechambre's Dietionnaire encyclop. des sci. vird., VI. 53, 54. (Quoted verl>atiiu l)y Laboulb^ne and Megnin, 1882, pp. 325- 327.) Lahoulb^ne, A., and Megnin, P. (1882), Memoire sur les Arga.s de Perse. Journ. d'- ranat. et de la p/iysiol. Pari.s, xviii. 317-341, Pis. XXI-XXIII. Latreille, P. A. (1796), Precis des caracteres ge'neriques des insectes, disposes dans un urdrc natiirel. An v. pp. xii + 201, 12", Brive. (Carios : p. 177.) (1804), Histoire naturelle, generate et 'particuliere, des crustaces et des insectes. An XII., VIII. pp. 411, 8°, Paris. {Cans: p. 55.) {lS(^),Gene7-acrustaceorumetinsectorum,l. pp. xviii + 302, Tab. i-xvi. {Caris : p. 161.) (1829), Crustaces arachnides et partie des insectes. Cuviei-'s Le r^gne animal, Paris, IV. pp. 584, 8°. {See Ixodes, pp. 287-290.) - — — (1835), Uober Caris respertilionis. Isis von Oken, Jena (6), pp. 511, 512. Leach, W. E. (1815), A tabular view of the external characters of four classes of animals, which Linne arranged under Insecta ; with the distribution of the genera composing three of these classes into orders, etc., and descriptions of several new genera and species. (Read April — June, 1814.) Trans, of the Linnaean Society, London, xi. 306-400. (Ixodoide;i : pp. 396-399.) Linstow, 0. von Q894), Die Giftthiere und ihre Wirkung auf den Menschen, 148 pp., 54 Figs. Berlin: Aug. Hirscbwald. (Brief reference to Ticks (J ;;9a.s), pp. 120- 121.) Bibliography 19 Livingstone, D. (1857), Missionar)/ Travels and Researches in South Africa^ etc., 711 pp. (Ticlcs : pp. 382, 383, 628, 629.) London : John Murray. (1874), The last Journals of David Livingstone, in Central Africa, from 1865 to his death, continued by a narrative of his last moments, etc., by H. Waller. 2 vols., 360 + 346 pp. (Ticks: vol. ii. pp. 33, 115.) London: J. Murray. Lounsbury, C. P. (1895), Fowl ticks (letter from T. W. Parker answered by C. P. L.). Af/ric. Jourit., Ci\\)e Town, viil. (25), pp. 657, 658. — — (1899a), Pig lice, alias Tampans. Agric. Jonrn., Cape Town, xiv. (4), Feb. 16, p. 240. (Tampan = Ornithodoros.) (1899b), Ticks. Report of the (JovH Entomologist for the year 1898. Cape of (rood I/ope Dep't of Agric, Cape Town, 1899, pp. 43-46, PI. IX. (1900 a), Notes on some South African Ticks. Proc. V-2th Ann. Meeting of the Assoc, of Econ. Entomologists. Issued by U.S. Dep't of Agric, Division of Entomology. Bulletin No. 26, n.s. Washington, pp. 41-48. {Amblyomma hebraeuni, U. aegypti^im, Rh. decoloratus, Rh. evertsi,. Orn. savignyi, Arg. persicus.) (1900b), Insect bites and the effects thereof. Canadian Entomologist, xxxii. 17-24. (Bites of ticks, not insects. Argas, Orn. samgnyi or tampan.) (1902), (Tick investigations) Tampan not associated with heartwater (p. 65) — Tick-Heartwater investigations (pp. 2-4, 29-74) — Tick Malignant Jaimdice investigations (pp. 4-9) — Tick, catching and destruction (pp. 3, 4, 49, 71), Pis. IV-VI. Report of the Gov't Entomologist for the year 1901, Cape of Good Hope DepH of Agric Cape Town, 1902. (Tampan = Ornithodoros.) (IX. 1903), The fowl tick. Studies on its life-cycle and habits. Agric. Journ., Cape Town, 15 pp., 3 Pis., repr. (XI. 1904), External parasites of fowls. Agric. Journ., Cape of Good Hope. No. 27, Repr., 5 pp., 4 Figs. (Includes a .short account of Argas persicus ; more fully treated in Lounsbury (IX. 1903).) Lucas, H. (1849), Exploration scientifique de VAlgerie. Zoologie i. Histoire naturelle des Animaux articulds, Part I, pp. 316, 317. Ludwig, H. (1886), Leunis' Synopsis der Thierkimde, 3. Aufl. ii. pp. xvi + 1231, Figs. 1160, Hannover. (Git. in bibl. by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Manson, P. (1903), Tropical Diseases. A Manual of the Diseases of Warm Climates. 3rd ed. Cassell and Co., London, 756 pp. {Re Ornithodoros mo^ibata see pp. 713, 714.) (1908), Tropical Diseases. A Manual of Diseases of Warm Climates. London: Cassell and Co., Ltd., 876 pp. (Ticks described, pp. 202-205 and figured on coloured PI. IV : Boophilus (? annvlatus) $ , Lxodes ricinus 5 [both gorged], Orn. mouhata, A. persicus, all in dorsal aspect.) Marchoux, E., and Salimbeni, A. (IX. 1903), La Spirillose des Poules. .1 nn. d. riiist. Pasteur, xvii. 56i)-580, repr. Marlatt, C. L. (11. VIII. 1899), A Californian Tick. Canadian Entomologist, p. 229, repr. (Argas'i found in Santa Lucia Mts.) Marx, G. (1892a), Notes on the Classification of the Ixodidae. Proc Entomol. Soc Washington, ii. 232-236. (Cynorhoestea proposed as a Sub-order of Acarina to 9*— 2 Bibliography 21 include all ticks (Argasidae, Ixodidae, Escliatucephalidac, Haemalastoridae, Rhipistcmiidao) under -l groups : ( 'atastouiata, Antistomata.) Marx, G. (1892b), On the morphology of the ticks. Proc. Eutomol. Soc. WaMnyton, II. 271-287. (Historical sketch re Antistomuta ; larvae, adults, detailed morphology.) (1895), Obituary Notice of his Work. Plate illustrating following species published in connection with obituary, Proc. Ent. Sac. Wash., vol. iii. p[). 195- 201 : Rhynchopnon spinosum { = Ornitliodoros megnini, nymph), Ornlthodoros arnericanus ( = 0. megnini, adult), Argas amencanus. Massey, A. Y. (1905), Spirillosis in Portuguese West Africa. Journ. Trop. Med., VIII. 225. (Describes a case in man.) Mdgnin, P. (I. 1868), La famille des Ixodes. Journ. de med. ve'te'r. vdlit., vi. 423. (1876a), ]\leinoire sur I'organisation et la distribution zoologique des acarieris de la Famille des Gamasides. Journ. de Vanut. et de la Physiol., Paris, xii. xMai-Juin, pp. 288-336, Pis. VII, VIII. (1880a), Les Parasites et les Maladies Parasitaires chez Vhomme, les animaux domestiqiies et les animaux saiwages avec lesquels ils penvent etre en contact; in- sectes, arachnides, crustace's, pp. 478, Figs. 65, Pis. XXVI, 8", Paris. (Ticks: pp. 106-136, 322, 344, 363, 403, 422.) (1882), Experience sur Taction nocive des Argas de Perse. Compt. rend. Soc. de biol., Paris, Sdr. 7, iv. 305-307. (1885), Les Argas du Mexique. Journ. de Vanat. et de la physiol., Paris, xxi. 460-474, Pis. XX, XXI. (1892), Les Acariens Para-^ites. {Encyclope'die Scientifique des Aide-memoire.) Paris: Gauthier-Villars et Fils. 40 Figs., 182 pp., 12«. {See pp. 25-67: Chapter ii., " Famille des Ixodides.") (1895 a), Les parasites articules chez Vhomme et les animaux utiles {maladies quails occasionnent). 2. ed. des parasites et maladies parasitaires, augmentee d'un appendice sur les parasites des cadavres. 2 vols., 1 pi., 510 pp. ; atlas, 1 pi., 26 ]., 26 pp., 8". Paris : G. Masson. (15. X. 1895), Sur les pretendus roles pathog^niques des Tiques ou Ixodes. Bull, de Vacad. de mid., xxxiv. 354-369. M^gnin, P., and Laboulbene (1882), Sur les Argas de Perse. Compt. Rendus Soc. liiol., Paris, Sc'^r. 7, iv. p. 577. {See full paper under Laboulb^ne and Megnin.) Mingazzini (1898), Zoologia medica, pp. 245-249. {A. rejtexus, cit. Huber, 1899, p. 16.) Mollers, B. (1907), Experimentelle Studien liber die Uebertragung des Riickfallfiebers durch Zecken. Ztschr. f. Hyg. u. Infektionskr., LViii. 277-286. Moniez, R. (1896), Traite de Parasitologic, pp. 499-509. (Refers especially to A. rejiexus, mentions other Argasidae; cited by Huber, 1899, Heft 2; 1900, Heft 4.) Moquin-Tandon (1860), Elements de Zoologie me'dicale. (Cited by older authors re ticks and in Huber's bibliography (1900, Heft 4).) (1861), Elements of Medical Zoology, tran.slated and edited by Robert Thomas Hulme, pp. 423, Figs. 124, London. (Cited by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Blhliography 23 Morgan, H. A. (1899a), Ticks and Texas Fever. RvU. No. 56, ser. 2, Louisiana A(/nr. Exp. St.a., ]>\\ 128-141, Pis. I-IX. Mosler, F., and Peiper, E. (1894), Thierische Parasiten, 1st ed., in Nothnagel's Specielle Pathol, u. Tkerapie, vi. 345 y>\>., 124 Figs., 8". Wien : Alfred Holder. (Pp. 320-322 brief mention of ticks, nothing original, including two figures. See note to 2nd ed.) (1904), Tieriscke Parasiten, 2n(i ed., 37(1 pp., 162 Figs. Wien : Alfred Holder. (Brief reference to Ticks on p[). 344-346 ; one Fig. of Argan reflexus after Pagenstecher ; contains nothing original except that a Fig. (No. 140) of Ixodes ricinus after Kiichenmeister is desci'ibed in the legend as Dermani/ssus gallinae ! This correct in the 1st ed., p. 320.) Murray, A. (1877), Economic Entomology ; Aptcra, r. i)p. iii.-xxiii., 3-433, with numerous text-iigures. London : Chapman and Hall (South Kensington Museum Science Handbooks). {Sec Ixodoidea, pp. 180-204, 28 Figs., of which 9 appear original (?) ; all poor however tind mostly copied from Koch, C. L., 1847.) Neumann, L. G-. (1888), Traite'des maladies parasitaires non-microbienncs des aninumx do)nesti(ji(es, pp. 673, Figs. 306. Paris. (1892a), Traite des maladies parasitaires no7i-microbiennes des animaux domes- tiques, 2. ed., pp. 767, Figs. 364. Paris. (1892b), A treatise on the parasites and parasitic diseases of the domesticated animals, pp. 800, Figs. 364. Paris. (1896), Revision de la famille des Ixodides. I. Argasines. Me'm. Soc. Zool. de France, IX. pp. 1-44, Figs. 1-36. (1901), Revision de la famille des Ixodides. 4«^ Memoire. Mem. Soc. Zool. de France, xiv. 249-372, 18 Figs. (1905), Notes sur les Ixodides, III. Arch, de Parasitol., ix. 225-241. (1906), Notes sur les Ixodides, IV. Arch, de Parasitologic, x. 195-219, 17 Figs. (1907), Notes sur les Ixodides, V. Arch, de Parasitologic, xi., pp. 215-232, Figs. 1-14. (V. 1907), Note XI, Quatre nouvelles esp^ces d'lxodides. Notes from the Leyden Museum, xxix. 88-100, 7 Figs. (XII. 1907), Note sur les Ixodidae recueillis dans les ties de l'(jcean Indien par M. J. Stanley Gardiner. Trans. Linn. Soc, London, 2 ser.. Zoology, xii. 193- 194. (III. 1908), Notes sur les Ixodides, VI. Arch. d. Parasitologic, xii. 1-27, 16 Figs. Neveu-Lemaire, M. (1904), Parasitologic animale, 2nd ed. {Precis de Me'decine, No. 1), 218 pp., 301 Text- Figs. Paris: F. R. de Rudeval. (Ixodoidea: 151-157, 4 Figs. ; none original.) Newstead, R. (XI. 1905), On the External Anatomy of Ornithodoros moubata. Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Memoir xvii. pp. 21-26, 1 Map, Pis. I-IV. (30. XII. 1905), On tlie pathogenic Ticks concerned in the distribution of disease in man, with special reference to the differential characters in Ornitho- doros moubata. Brit. Med. Journ., pp. 1695-1697 ; also Lancet, CLXix. pp. 365- 385. Bibliography 25 Nuttall, G. H. F. (1899), On the rule of insects, arachnids and rnyriapods, as carriers in the spread of \)acterial and parasitic diseases of man and animals. A critical and historical study. Johns Hopkins Hospital Reports, viii. 154 pp., 3 Plates. Published also in part in Hygienisdie Rundschau, 1899, ix. See especially pp. 402-408. (1905), Ticks and tick-transmitted diseases. (Paper read 9. xii. 1904.) Trans. Epidemiol. Soc, London, N.S., vol. xxiv., Session 1904-1905, pp. 12-32, 1 Map. (VII. 1908), The Ixodoidea or Ticks. Journ. Roy. Inst. Puhl. Health, xvi. 385-403, 7 Figs., 1 Diagr. (original). Harben Lecture I. (VIII. 1908), Spirochaetosis in Man and Animals. Journ. Roy. Inst. Puhl. Health, xvi. 449-464. Harben Lecture II. (Argasidae in relation to disease.) Oken (1818), Sogenannte giftige Wanze in Persien. Isis, 1818, pp. 1567-1570, PI. XIX, Figs. 1-4. Osborn, H. (1896), Insects affecting domestic animals : an account of the species of importance in North America, with mention of related forms occurring in other animals. U.S. DepH of Agrimdt., Division of Entomol., Bidletin No. 5, N.S. (Washington D.C.), 302 pp., richly illustrated. Packard, A. S. (1872), "Arachnida" in f^»S'. Geological Survey of the territories, etc., p. 740, Fig. 68. {Argas americanus : description reprinted by Osborn, 1896, p. 256.) (1893), Note on A. americanus. Insect Life, v. 267, 348. (1895), Note on the chicken tick {Argas americanus, Pack.). Insect Life, vii. 417, 418. Pagenstecher, H. A. (1861), A. reflexus. Virchoiv's Arch., xix. p. 457. (Cited by Pagenstecher, 1862.) (1862), Zur Anatomic von Argas reflexiis. Zeitschr. f. loiss. Zoologie, XI. 142- 155, PI. XVI. Pavesi, P. (1884), Materiali per lo studio della faiuia tunisina. II. Aracnidi. Annali del Museo Vivico di Storia Naturale di Genova, xx. pp. 483-485. Perroncito, E. (1882), / Parassiti deW uomo e degli animali utili, p. 459. (See next title.) (^1901), / Parassiti delV uomo e degli animali utili e le piit comuni malattie da es.fi prodotte. Profilassi e cura relativa, pp. 276, Text-Figs., 25 Plates. Milano : F. Vallardi. (Pp. 561-568 relate to ticks, 2 Figs., one after Giirlt, the other very similar to Blanchard's of A. persicus.) Planchoi), L. (1895), Observations sur la resistance vitale de V Argas reflexus, Latr. Feuille des Jeun. Naturalist., (3) xxvi. 29. (Cit. Huber, 1899, p. 15 ; inaccessible.) Plehn, A. (1902), Tropenhygiene. (Cited by Werner, 1906, p. 779, as stating that the natives of German E. Africa have long referred fever to bites of " papasi '' (Suaheli for tick).) Pocock, R. I. (23. I. 1900), On a collection of insects and arachnids made in 1895 and 1897, by Mr C. V. A. Peel, F.Z.S., in Somaliland, with descriptions of new species. 9. Chilopoda and Arachnida. Proceedings Zool. Soc. of London, 1900, Text, pp. 49-51 (relate to ticks), PI. Ill, Fig.s. 1-1 c^, 2-2/ Bibliography 27 Pocock, R. I. (1903). See Christy, 1903, p. 188. (1907), Article "Ticks," in A System of Medicine by many Authors, edited by Allbutt and RoUeston (London : Macniillan), vol. ii. Part ii., pp. 187-203. (Partial Bibliography, contains numerous inaccuracies.) Pohl and Kollar (1823), Brasiliens vorzilglich Idstiye Insecten. Wien. {Argasidae: title cit. by Huber, 1899, p. 14 ; inaccessible.) Porter (1821), Travels. (Die giftigen Wanzen in Persien. Froriep. Not. i. No. 12) : cited thus by Huber, 1899, p. 16, as referring to A. persicus. Railliet, A. (1886), JEleoients de zoologie medicale et agricole, pp. xv + 1053. Figs. 705, 8". Paris. (1893), Traite de zoologie me'dicale et agricole., fasc. 1, pp. 736, Figs. 494. (1895), Traite de zoologie me'dicale et agricole, 2nd ed. Paris : Asseliu et Houzeau. (Ticks: pp. 703-718, Figs. 478-488.) Raspail, F. V. (1839), Rech. d'hist. nat. sur les insectes morbipares. Gaz. des hopitaux (2), i. p. 9. (Cited by Terrenzi, 1893, pp. 73-76, and Braun, 1895, p. 258, in connection with Argas reflexus.) "R. E." (1874), Argas reflexus. Science Gossip, 1874, p. 161. Reaney, M. F., (V. 1907), Spirillosis in domestic fowls. Brit. Med. Joimi., i. 1118. (Only a note.) (XI. 1907), Fowl spirillosis. Ind. Med. Gaz., xlii. 401, 402. (2 Figs., bad.) Reclus, A. (1880), Exploitations aux isthmes de Panama et de Darien, en 1876, 1877, 1878. Lc Tour du Monde, 1880, xxxix. 396-398. Riley, C. V. (1887), Poisonous Insects. Reference Handh. Med. Sci., v. 741-760, Figs. 2971-3020. (Cited in Bibl. by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Riley, C. V., and Howard, L. 0. (IV. 1895), A new chicken plague in Texas, and the cattle tick affecting hor.ses. Insect Life, v. 267, 348. (Further absti-acts of pa[)ers on ticks in general (unimportant), Ibid., vi. 58, 165.) Risso, A. (1826), Histoire naturelle des principales productions de V Europe meridionale et principalement de celles des environs de Nice et des Alpes Alaritimes, vol. v. viii-l-402, Pis. I-V, Paris. (Cited by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Rivolta and Delprato (1880), Ornitliojatria, p. 314. (.4. reflexus, cit. Huber, 1899, p. 16.) Robertson, F. H. (1905), Fowl tick experiments. Jo2crn. Bep't Agric. West Australia, XII. 561-563. (Cited by Hunter and Hooker, 1907.) Rollinat, R., and Trouessart, E. (1897), Sur la reproduction des chauves-souris. II. Les Rhinolophes et Note sur leur parasites epizoiques. Mem. de la Soc. Zool. de France, x. 114-138. {See re Ixodidae, pp. 136, 137.) Roncisvalle, D. M. (1899), Intorno agli effetti morbosi degli Ixodidi sull' uomo. Atti delV Accad. Gioenia di Sc. Nat. in Catania, Lxxvi. (Cited by Perroncito (1901, p. 562) re ticks attacking man. Also cit. in Entomol. News, Philadelphia, XI. p. 506.) Sall^ (1849), Rev. Mag. Zool., p. 342. (Description of sufferings from Argas {Orni- tltodoros) talaje, translated in Murray, A., 1877, pp. 183, 184.) Salmon, D. E., and Stiles, C. W. (1901), The cattle ticks (Ixodoidea) of the United States. Xlth Annual Report of the Bureau of Animal Industry, U.S. DepH of Agric, Washington, pp. 380-488, Figs. 42-257. Blhliograpliji 29 Sanibon, L. W. (1900), Ticks and Tick Fevers. Journ. of Tropical Med., ii. 217-223. Sctnchez, J. (1893), Accidentes producidos por las garrapatas. In Sanchez's Zool. rued, mexic, 8", Mexico, 21. Savigny, J. (1826), Description de I'Egypte. Planches do zoologie. Ai-achnides, PL IX. Schellack, C. (18. IV. 1908), Uebei-tragungsversuche der Spirochaete gallinarttm diirch Ary()rdier, 1882, p. 132.) Schnee (1908), Uebcr das Vorkonmien von Argas in Deutschland. Arch. f. Schifs- H. Tropen-Hijij., xii. 32. Schneidemiihl, Gr. (1896), Lekrhnch der Vergleichenden Patlwlogie nnd Therapie des Meiisclien nnd der Hausthiere fiir Thierdrzte, Arzte und Studirende, 2. Lief., pp. 209-448, 8". Leipzig. Siebold, K. T. E. von (1850), " Parasiten," in Handwiirterh. d. Physiol, mit Buchicht auf physiol. Path., Braunschweig, ii. pp. 641-692. (Cited in Bibl. by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Simpson, J. C (27. IV. 1901), Case of a parasite — " Argas (or Ornithodorus) rnegnini Dugcs — in each ear. Lancet, 7 pp., 3 P^igs. repr. Spicer, W. W. (1874a), The Canterbury tick. Science Gossip, lxxiv. p. 185. — (1874b), Ibid., p. 209. Stiles, C. W. (See Salmon and Stiles.) Stiles, C. W., and Hassall, A. (26. III. 1901). Notes on parasites, 55-.^7. A pupa- like stage in the development of the spinose ear tick (Ornithodoros megnini) of cattle. f^^S". Dep't of Agr. Bureau of Animal Industry, Circular No. 34, 2 pp.j repr. Sundvall, C J. (1833), Conspectus Arachnidarum Lund. In Acad. Carolina. (Michael, 1883, p. 34, gives Sundvall's classification.) Szovits (1828), Ueber die Wanzen von Miana. Froriep. Not., xxii. No. 478. {A. persicus, cit. Huber, 1899, p. 16.) Taschenberg, E. L. (1873), Mitteilung iiber die einheimische Saumzecke. Zeitschr. f. d. gesamint. Naturwiss., XLI. 381. (Cited by Brandes, 1897.) (1874), The Canterbury tick {Argas rejlexus). Science Gossip, 1874, p. 171. (1880), Praktische Insektenkunde. 5. Theil. 238 pp., 43 Figs. Bremen : M. Hcinsius. (Ticks: pp. 150-153; describes Lvodes spec, Argas reflexus, and gi\es 2 small original figures, the large adult Argas (!) has only 6 legs.) (1900), Die Insekten Tausendf Ussier und Spinnen, being vol. ix. of Brehm's Thierleben. Leipzig u. Wien. 764 pp. (Ixodoidea ; pp. 733-741.) Taschenberg, 0. (date ?), Einiges iiber niitzliche und schadliche Thiere. Die Natur XLVi. (Cited by Lucas. Lucas, 1898, says the paper is interesting re poison (jf Argus ; inaccessible.) Terrenzi, G. (1893-1894), Sopra un Acaro {Argas rejiexm) trovato per la prima volta in Italia parassito sull' uomo. Riv. ital. Sci. Nat., xiv., 73-76, 97, 98. Bibliography 31 Tholozan, J. D. (1882), Dcs plK'Homenes inorbicles i)roduits par la piqAre des parasites voisiiis de.s Ixodes, les Argas de Perse. Afem. Soc. Biol., p. 15. {A. persicm, cit. Huber, KSUi), p. 17.) Tonnel (14. XI. 1906), L' Argas re^exns i)arasite de Thomme. Semaine Med., No. 46, p. 552. (Abstract of paper which appeared in a recent number of VEcho med. du Nord.) Townsend, C H. T. (1893), Ticks in the ears of horses. Journ. N.Y. Entomol. Soc, 1. (2), June, pp. 49-52. (0. megnini.) Treviranus, G. R. (1831), Ueber den Bau der Nigua {Acarus americanus L., Acarv^ nigua De Geer). Zeitschr. f. Physiologie. Heidelberg and Leipzig, iv. (2), pp, 185-191, Taf. XV. xvi. (Cited by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Trouessart (1891 and 1892), Considerations generales sur la classitication des Acarieus, suivies d'un essai de classitication nouvelle. licviie des sd. nat. de I'ouest, Paris, i. (4), Oct., pp. 289-308; ii. (1), Jan., pp. 20-54. (Cited in Bibl. by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Trouessart, E. L. (no date, ca. 1896 ?), Les parasites des habitations huiuaiues, 1 68 pp., 53 Figs. Paris: Masson. (Ticks: pp. 122, 123, Fig. 50; little about ticks, and nothing original.) Utility (1899), The poultry tick. The Agrie. Gaz., Tasmania, vi. (10), April, p. 185. (Inaccessible.) Verrill, A. E. (1870), The external parasites of domestic animals : Their effect and remedies. Fourth Annual Report of the Secretary of the Connecticut Board of Agriculture (1869-70), 1870, pp. 72-122, Figs. 1-47. (Cited in Bibl. by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Wagner, E. (1876), Manual of General Pathology, translated from the sixth German edition by John van Duyn and E. C. Seguin, pp. x + 728, 8", New York, Wm. Wood and Co. (Brief mention of ticks. ) Walckenaer, C. A. de, and Gervais, P. (1837-47), Histoire naturelle des Insectes (Suites a Bufibn). Aptt;res. 4 vols., 52 Pis. Paris : Roret. (First work on general classification of ^l/>Soc. Trop. Med., ii. boiuid reprints. 16 pp., 4 Figs. (1907), Preliminary notes on some bodies found in ticks — Ornith. motibata (Murray) — fed on blood containing emliryos of Filar in perstans (Manson). Brit. Med. Journ., ii. 142. Werner i,1906), Zur Epidemiologic des afrikanischen Recurrens. Arch. f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hyg., x. 776-781. (Discusses the epidemiology of African si)irochaetosi8 in German E. Africa and its history, with incidental mention of ticks.) Westwood, J. 0. (1877), The President's Address. Proc. Entomol. Soc, London, 1877, pp. xxxvii Ixxxi. (Refers briefly to the " Blyborough tick" on p. Ixii.) Wheler, E. G. (1899 and 1900), (nassification of British Ticks. Science Gossip, 1899, PI). 363-365 ; 1900, pp. 11, 12, 37-41 (17 Figs.). (1901), Note on a remarkable stigmatic organ in the Nymph of Omithodoros megnini (Dugfes). (2 Figs, in text.) Journ. Quekett Microscop. Club, ser. 2, viii. 61, 62 ; also Jowm. iXeiv Vork Entomol. Soc, 1893, pp. 49-52, also included under Simpson, 1901, q.v. (1902), Parasitically inoculated diseases. Traus. of the Highland and Agr. Soc. of Scotland, 20 pp., repr. (III. 1906), British Ticks. Journal Agric. Set., Cambridge, i. 400-429, Pis. V-X. White, A. (1846), List of Annulosa (principally Insects) found on the journey of Henry H. Methuen, Esq., see Appendix to H. H. Methuen, Life in the Wilder- ness, or Wanderings in South Africa ; p. 363, PI. II, Fig. 4. Wickson, E. J. (1892), Ticks in the ear. Pacific Rural Press, March 19, p. 264. (Inaccessible.) Bihllofjraphy 35 Wood, H. C, and Fitz, R. H. (1897), The Practice of Medicine, pp. x + 1088, 8", I'hiladclpliia. (Cited in VA\A. by Salmon and Stiles, 1901.) Woods, P. T. (1898), Insects aftecting poultry. Farm Poultry/, i.\, (6), March 15, pp. 1U2, 103, Figs. 19, 20. (Cited in Bibl. by Salmon and Stilos, 1901.) Ziirn, F. A. (1872), Die Schmarotzer auf und in dem Kurper unxerer Ilaussdugethiere, soirie die dnrc/i erstere reranlassten Krankheiten, deren Behandluny und Verhiitung. Theil I : Die thierischen Parasiten. (4 Tafeln.) 236 pp. Weimar : B. F. Voigt. (A very short account of ticks on pp. 37, 38, only 2 species mentioned, and one of these, " I. ricinus 9," badly tigured. No original matter.) (1882), Die Knmkheiten des Hausgefliigels, p. 78. {A. rejlexus, c\t. Hiiber, 1889, p. 16.) Important for Medical Men, Economic Biologists and Zoologists PUBLISHED BY THE CAStBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS PARASITOLOGY A SUPPLEMENT TO THE c JOURNAL OF HYGIENE Edited by George H. F. Nuttall, F.R.S., Quick Professor of Biology ia the University of Cambridge, and A. E. Shipley; F.R.S., University Lecturer in the Advanced Morphology of the Invertebrates. When the Journal of Hygiene was founded it was announced that papers on Parasitology " in relation to hygiene and preventive medicine " would be published in its pages. It has however been felt for some time that the Journal was becoming unduly burdened with papers dealing with the anatomy of mosquitoes, fleas, protozoa and other parasites — of great importance in themselves — but having only an indirect relation to hygiene and preventive medicine. The remarkable development of parasitology in recent years, and the increase in our knowledge of the part played by parasites in human and animal diseases, demand a means of publication, in the English language, of original papers dealing with the subject in its widest sense. It is proposed in future to relegate all such papers to Parasitology. Papers on the subjects we have mentioned are now scattered in journals of widely different character, into some of which they are but grudgingly admitted. We trust that Parasitology will fulfil the purpose the editors have in view, of encouraging the study of parasitology, especially in relation to disease, by providuig a means for the publication of papers relating to pathogenic and disease-transmitting parasites. It is therefore hoped that this publication will appeal not only to medical men at home and abroad, but to veterinarians, zoologists and agriculturalists. Parasitology, though a supplement to the Journal of Hygiatie, will be issued in the form of a separate yearly volume of four to five hundred pages. The parts will be issued when sufficient material has accumulated. The sub- scription price is .£1. Is. per volume (post-free), payable in advance; single numbers 7s. net. S'ubscribers to the Journal of Hygiene may obtain single numbers of Parasitology at the reduced price of 5s. net, or may become sub- scribers at the reduced rate of Ids. Subscriptions may be sent to any Bookseller, or to Mb C. F. CLAY, Manaqbr, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Fetter Lane, London, E.C. (The Contents of the first three numbers of Parasitology are given on the next page.) PARASITOLOGY (continued) CONTENTS OF VOL. I. NO 1. (March 1908.) Jordan, K., and Rothschild, The Hon. N. C. Revision of the Non- Combed Eyed Siphonaptera (Plates I — VII and 1 text figure), pp. 1—100. CONTENTS OF VOL. L NO. 2. (June 1908.) Castellani, a. Note on a Liver Abscess of Amoebic Origin in a Monkey (Plate VIII), pp. 101—102. Imms, a. D. On the Larval and Pupal stages of Anopheles maculipennis Meigen (Plates IX, X), pp. 103—133. NuTTALL, G. H. F., and Graham-Smith, G. S. The Mode of Multipli- cation of Piroplasma bovis and P. pifkeci in the Circulating Blood compared with that of P. cards, with Notes on other species of Piroplasma (Plate XI and 4 diagrams), pp. 134 — 142. NuTTALL, G. H. F. Note on the Behaviour of Spirocha€ta£ in Acanthia lectularia, pp. 143 — 151. NuTTALL, G. H. F., Cooper, W. F. and Robinson, L. E. The Structure and Biology of ffaemaphysalis punctata Canestrini and Fanzago, I. (Plates XII — XVI, of which two are coloured, and 9 text figures), pp. 152—181. Masterman, E. W. G. Hirudinea as Human Parasites in Palestine, pp. 182—185. Harding, W. A. Note on a Gnathobdellid Leech (Limnatis sp. ?) from Angola (1 figure), pp. 186—189. Shipley, A. E. Note on Cystidicola farionis Fischer, A thread- worm Parasite in the Swim-bladder of a Trout, pp. 190 — 192. Leiper, R. T. Note on the Anatomy of Gystidicola farionis, pp. 193 — 194. CONTENTS. OF VOL. I. NO. 3. (October 1908.) Turner, G. A. Bilharziosis in South Africa, pp. 195—217. Cleland, J. Burton. Note on Spirochaetes in Castration Tumours of Pigs, pp. 218— 219. Nuttall, George H. F. and Graham-Smith, G. S. Notes on the Drug Treatment of Canine Piroplasmosis, pp. 220—226. Durham, Herbert E. Notes on Nagana and on some Haematozoa observed during my travels, pp. 227 — 235. Minchin, E. a. Note on the Polymorphism of Trypanosoma Gambiense (Plate XVII), pp. 236— 237. Nuttall, George H. F., Cooper, W. F. and Robinson, L. E. On the Structure of " Haller's Organ " in the Ixodoidea (Plate XVIII and 1 text figure), pp. 238—242. Nuttall, George H. F. and Graham-Smith, G. S. The Development of Piroplasma canis in Culture (Plate XIX and 1 text figure), pp. 243—260. Part II, Izodidae] [May, 1911 TICKS A MONOGRAPH OF THE IXODOIDEA By GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL M.A., M.D., Ph.D., Sc.D., F.R.S. Fellow of Magdalene College Quick Professor of Biology in the University of Cambridge CECIL WARBURTON M.A., F.Z.S. Christ's College, Zoologist to the Royal Agricultural Society W. F. COOPER and L. E. ROBINSON B.A., F.Z.S., F.L.S. A.R.C.SC. (Lond.) PART II By GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL and CECIL WARBURTON CAMBRIDGE AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON: FETTER LANE. C. F. CLAY, Manager AND H. K. LEWIS, GOWER STREET EDINBURGH : 1 GO, PRINCES STREET BERLIN : A. ASHER & CO. LEIPSIC : F. A. BROCKHAUS NEW YORK : G. P. PUTNAM's SONS BOMBAY AND CALCUTTA : MACMILLaN & CO., LTD. I THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK THE JOURNAL OF HYGIENE EDITED BY GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL, M.D., Ph.D., Sc.D., F.RS. QUICK PBOPESSOB OF BIOLOGY IN THE TJNIVHR8ITT Ot CAUBKIDOH IK CONJUNCTION WITH JOHN S. HALDANE, M.D., F.R.S. ARTHUR NEWSHOLME, M.D., F.R.C.P. RBADER IN PHTSIOtOGT IK THE BfEDICAIj OFFICSB TO THE UNIVEKSITt OF OXFOBD LOCAl QOVBRNMEKT BOARD CHARLES J. MARTIN, M.B., D.Sc, F.R.S. DIRECTOR OF THE MStEB INSTrnjTE OF PREVENTlVB kEOlOIRE, LONDOS The Journal of Hygiene is issued as material acciuntilates, A volume containing four or more parts and about 500 pages, with plates and figures, is issued annually. Volumes I, II, and III (1901-3) complete. In Four Parts, paper covers, 15*. net per volume. Bound in buckram, 18«. Qd. net per volume. Volumes IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX and X (1904-10) complete. In Four Parts, paper covers, 2 Is. net per volume. Bound in buckl-am, 25a. net per volume. The subscription price is £1. 1«. per volume (post-free), payable in advance. (Plague Numbers, Price Ss. net each.) Subscriptions may be sent to any Bookseller, or to Mb C. F. CLAY, Manager, Cambridge University Press, Fetter Lane, London, E.G. CONTENTS OF VOL. XI, NO. 1 (March 1911) MoRdAN, H. DE R. The Differentiation of the Mannite-fermenting Group of B. dysmiteriae with Special Reference to Strains Isolated from Various Sources in this Country. BAiNbRiDGE, F. A. and Dudfield, R. An Outbreak of Acute Gastro- enteritis caused by B. paratyphosus (B.). PenfOLD, W. J. Studies in Bacterial Variation. With special reference to the chemical functions of the members of the typhoid-coli group. (With Plate I, and 9 Charts.) Bainbridge, F. a. and O'Brien, R. A. On the Paratyphoid Group of Bacilli. Trommsdorff, R., Rajchman, L. and Porter, Agnes E. A Severe Outbreak of Food Infection Caused by a Paratyphoid Carrier. Hewlett, R. Tanner, Villar, Sidney and Revis, Cecil, On the Nature of the Cellular Elements Present in Milk. Part III. The Milk of Animals other than the Cow. (For the British dairy farmers' association.) Porter, A. E. The Precipitin, Complementbinding, and Antiopsonic Tests in Tuberculous and Normal Cattle. Seidelin, Harald. The Quantitative Estimation of Indole. Chick, Harriette, and Martin, C. J. The Fleas Common on Rata in Different Parts of the World and the Readiness with which they Bite Man. (With Plate II) TICKS A MONOGRAPH OF THE IXODOIDEA PART II CAMBKIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS 3Lontion: FETTER LANE, E.G. C. F. CLAY, Manager Gfiinburgf): 100, PRINCES STREET ILonton: H. K. LEWIS, 136, GOWER STREET, W.C. iSnlin: A. ASHER AND CO. ILcipjig: F. A. BROCKHAUS i^eta Sorfe: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS 3Sombag anti Calcutta: MACMILLAN AND CO., Ltd. All rights reserved TICKS A MONOGRAPH OF THE IXODOIDEA By GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL M.A., M.D., Ph.D., Sc.D., F.R.S. Fellow of Magdalene College Quick Professor of Biology in the University of Cambridge CECIL WARBURTON M.A., F.Z.S. Christ's College, Zoologist to the Royal Agricultural Society W. F. COOPER and L. E. ROBINSON B.A., F.Z.S., F.L.S. A.R.C.Sc. (Lond.) Cooper Laboratory for Economic Research, Watford PART II Cambridge at the University Press 191 1 IXODIDAE Section I. CLASSIFICATION Section II. THE GENUS IXODES by GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL and CECIL WARBURTON PREFACE TO PAET II WE greatly regret the delay which has occurred in the publication of this the second part of our work. The delay has not been due to any lack of diligence on our part but to various difficulties which we encountered in the preparation of our manuscript. For, when we came to make a careful study of Ixodes, we found it necessary to re- write almost all of the specific descriptions after personally examining such types as were accessible. This necessitated journeys to Berlin, Paris, Toulouse and London (British Museum), and a considerable correspondence with heads of Museums, owners of type specimens, and others in many places throughout the world. We commence Section I of this part with (1) an historical review dealing with the classification of ticks. This, and the succeeding chapter (2), dealing with the superfamily Ixodoidea, might, perhaps, with more propriety have appeared at the commencement of Part I, but it is chiefly with regard to the Ixodidae that taxonomic difficulties have been encountered, and, moreover. Chapter 2 forms a necessary connecting link leading to the matter which follows. In Chapter 3 we have gone with some detail into the generic diagnoses of Ixodidae, these being illustrated in a manner not attempted hitherto if we except the crude figures accompanying the publication of Lahille. Section II, which forms tlie bulk of Part II, concerns itself solely with the genus Ixodes, but for some of the matter contained in the appendices. At the commencement of the section, under Synonymy, we give our reasons for suppressing various generic and subgeneric names which have been applied to forms included by us in this genus. We definitely condemn many species which are merely nominal, and we have referred others to the category of " Doubtful Species," as will be seen by reference to the lists at the end. Under doubtful species we include such as are founded on immature forms or which have been vi Preface imperfectly described ; we propose to retain them in this category until they may have been properly described and shown to be valid by their authors or other workers. We do not consider it justifiable, in the present state of our knowledge, to found species on immature forms, a proceeding which might be warranted if the immature forms of all established species were known, whereas this is only true of 8 out of 51 species in the case of Ixodes. We agree in the main with Neumann in the synonomies of species, both valid and condemned, but we have in some instances arrived at different conclusions. Our lists of condemned genera and species and of doubtful species, which have been compiled by one of us (G. H. F. N.) with great labour, sufficiently demonstrate the difficulties we have encountered in separating the wheat from the chaff. These lists should at least prove useful to those desiring to avoid the giving of already preoccupied names to new species o^ Ixodes, Some of the synonyms must, from the nature of things, necessarily be regarded as tentative. Of the innumerable species of Ixodes that have been described, we are only able to recognize 51, and there may be but 48 which are valid. As will be seen from the text, a number of species and their various stages are adequately described and figured by us for the first time. The notes on Biology refer to matters of special interest relating to some of the species. We have added thereto two appendices dealing (I) with oviposition in Ornithodorus moubata, and (II) with the adaptation of ticks to the habits of their hosts. The appendices are reprinted from papers by Nuttall and Merriman and by Nuttall, which have recently appeared in Parasitology, Vol. iv (1911), and which bear directly upon the subject in hand. Illustrations. Curiously enough, some of the commonest species have never been accurately figured before, or figured at all : we have endeavoured to make good this deficiency. The 94 new illustrations in the text, like our earlier ones, are in most cases reproduced from large drawings made from unmounted specimens preserved in alcohol. The drawings were made with the aid of a camera-lucida mounted on a Zeiss binocular microscope and used in conjuuction with a Zeiss drawing-board. A scale drawn to one side of the figure usually indicates the magnification employed. Certain highly magnified figures of the capitulum, hypostome and other structures Preface vii were drawn from specimens mounted in balsam, using a monocular microscope, any errors of interpretation due to the transparency of the chitin in the mounted specimen being corrected by reference to the opaque object. We lay great stress on the avoidance of errors due to the examination of mounted specimens; figures of ticks drawn from such specimens are exceedingly misleading. Where a figure is re- produced from a freehand drawing, it is referred to as a "sketch " in the accompanying legend. We attach much importance to the illustration of the main structural characters in conjunction with the descriptions, for they convey a much more accurate and rapid impression to the mind than any amount of description. There are certain structures which should be figured in nearly all instances, and we have included them in most of our illustrations. The Part contains 202 text-figures (several being marked A and B) and 14 figures comprised in four plates, the total number of figures being 216. Text-Figures. Of the 94 new figures 84 were drawn by G. H. F. Nuttall^ 6 ,, ,, F. M. Hewlett I 3 ,, ,, C. Warburton ( * 1 was drawn by L. E. Robinson j Of the 107 previously 1 u,- ^- i m ,,.,,,. !■ 48 are from pubhcations by Neumann published figures J 32 ,, ,, Nuttall and Warburton, jointly, or as separate authors 4 „ ,, Wheler 2 „ ,, Salmon and Stiles 1 is from a publication by Evans 1 ,, ,, Lewis 2 are from publications by Nuttall, Cooper and Eobinson, and Nuttall and Merriman 18 are reprinted from Parts I and II to illustrate matters treated of in the appendices 202 Plate-Figures. Of the 4 new figures 2 are from photographs by E. G. Wheler 2 ,, ,, L. E. Robinson The 10 published figures are all from Wheler 14 * We have made it a rule to consult together about most of our figures, with a view to ensuring their accuracy. viii Prejace The figures reproduced from Neumann are mostly printed from the original blocks. These have all been purchased from the publishers of his papers, or they have been duplicated from the original blocks with the kind consent of Professor Neumann and of the editors of the various journals in which they were published. Mr E. G. Wheler has generously presented us with the blocks used in the illustration of his papers, together with numerous unpublished photographs of ticks. Of the figures by other authors, we have only chosen such as appear suitable for the purposes of this book. We have decided to publish our whole Bibliography as it stands in the form of a separate fasciculus ; should further references be necessary in connection with succeeding parts, short supplementary lists of references will be appended to the respective parts. We shall be much indebted to any of our readers who may draw our attention to errors and omissions. A cknowledgments. We are specially indebted to Professor L. G. Neumann, of Toulouse, for the generous aid he has given us throughout, not only in placing his valuable collection of types at our disposal, but also in helping us with his advice and counsel. Our thanks are also due to Geheimrath Professor W. Donitz, of Berlin, for friendly encouragement and ready aid repeatedly given. The following Institutions and gentlemen have helped us very materially by the loan of types and, in some cases, the gift of co-types : The Berlin Museum (gift of /. schillingsi Neumann co-types, through the courtesy of Geheimrath W. Donitz and Professor Dahl) ; the Paris Museum (gift of " /. transversalis Lucas" co-types, through the courtesy of Professor Bouvier) : the Hamburg Museum (loan of various types, through the courtesy of Professor Kraepelin) ; the Bureau of Entomology, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. (gift and loan of various specimens (some of which were identified by Mr N. Banks) thanks to the courtesy of Dr L. O. Howard). The Hon. N. C. Rothschild presented us with a very extensive collection of ticks from all parts of the world, many specimens not having been identified. We, how^ever, discovered that the collection included Neumann's /. australiensis (types) and /. nitens (types). The Rev. O. Pickard- Cambridge, F.R.S., sent us, on loan, the unique remaining type of /. putus (a nymph) in his collection. Professor A. Birula, of St Petersburg, presented a specimen Preface ix of /. signatus (type locality). Dr S. Hadwen, of Vancouver, British Columbia, presented various stages of /. angustus (types of cT, o and larvae). Dr J. H. Ashworth and Mr W. Evans, of Edinburgh, presented us with our /. caledonicus (types of $, o and larva). Mr E. G. Wheler presented a valuable collection, including some types of /. tenuirostris. Numerous specimens have been sent to us by Mr C. P. Lounsbury, Union Entomologist, S. Africa. Much material has reached us in the form of collections sent for determination ; we may especially cite the following sources : The Leland Stanford Junior University, California (courtesy of Professor Vernon L. Kellogg) ; the Dublin Museum (courtesy of Professor G. H. Carpenter and Dr Scharff ) ; the Entomo- logical Research Committee for Tropical Africa (our thanks are due to the Committee's Secretary, Mr Guy A. K. Marshall, for his uniform courtesy) ; the Indian Museum, Calcutta (courtesy of Dr N. Annandale). We have been permitted to retain specimens from these various collections. "We, are, moreover, personally indebted to numerous gentleman for aid, as stated in the notes on the specimens in our collection appended to the scientific descriptions. The original literature on various species of Ixodes, whilst very extensive, is in nearly all instances quite useless to the systematist, because many descriptions are short and vague and others, whilst very lengthy, omit to mention the specific characters whereby the species can be distinguished from others. We, of course, except the excellent descrip- tions of Professor Neumann, from which we have obtained much help. Almost all recent papers dealing with ticks are merely compilations from Neumann. The publications of Donitz are a marked exception to the rule. The papers by Banks have been of some assistance to us, though we have too often found his descriptions imperfect, and his illustrations greatly wanting in accuracy. G. H. F. N. C. W. Cambridge, May, 1911 a5 EERATA. 107, lines 1 and 26, for Sarconyssus read Sai-conissus 134, line 4 from below, for Sarconyssus Kolenati, 1857, p. 21 read Sarconissus Kolenati, 1856 and 1857, p. 21 line 5 from below for Dermanyssus Kolenati, 1857, p. 20 read Dermanissus Kolenati, 1856 and 1857, p. 20 CONTENTS OF PART II THE IXODIDAE SECTION I DEALING WITH THE CLASSIFICATION OF TICKS PAGE Historical Review relating to Classification, with Summary and Conclusions 105 The Superfamily IXODOIDEA Synonymy and litei'ature . 113 The superfamily characters defined . . . . . . 114 Ihe Family IXODIDAE Synonymy and literature . . . . . . . . 115 The family characters defined 115 Classification of the Ixodidae^ togetlier with an illustrated descrip- tion of the main characters of the different genera belonging to the family ........... 116 Explanation of the terms and signs used in the descriptions . 127 SECTION II I. THE GENUS IXODES LATREILLE, 1795. Synonymy and literature .......... 133 The generic characters defined . . . . . . • . . . 135 Keys for the determination of species of Ixodes : Males 135 Females ............. 137 Nymphs 140 Larvae ..... ...... 141 Xll Contents Specific descriptions of valid species and of their varieties and subspecies N.B. The signs $ , $ , o , L, alongside the specific names indicate the various developmental stages of each species which are known to science. 1. ricimcs (^ , 9 > o , L „ with three varieties : scapularis ^ , ovatus 9 californicus $ 2. nigricans $ 3. acuminatus 4. dentatus 9 5. diversifossus 6. minor ^, $ 7. holiviensis ^ , $ , 8. fuscipes 9 9. scidphis $ 10. spinicoxalis $ 11. marxi $. 12. pratti $, $ 13. ruhidus $ , o 14. hexagomis ^, $, o, L „ with one variety : cookei ^ , 15. nitens $ . 16. bicornis $ 17. auritidus $ 18. hrunneus $, o, L 19. cavipalpus $ , $ 20. angustus ^ , $ , o , L 21. caledonicus $ , o , L 22. fossulaius ? . 23. acutitarsiis 9 • 24. gigas $ . 25. rubicundus (J, $ „ with one var: 26. simplex $ , o . 27. japonensis $ . 28. canisuga ^ , $ , o , 29. texanus $ 30. stilesi ? . 31. neumanni 5 , o 32. percavatus $ . „ with one variety : rothschildi 33. pilosus $ , $ , o , L „ with ? one variety : howardi $ , 34. lunatus $ 35. rasws (J, $ ? iety : limbatus Contents Xlll c^, ? 36. ugandanus (J, ? • ,, with one subspecies : djaroiuntsit 37. cordifer $ 38. holocyelus (^ , ? , o 39. sehillingsi c? , ? . o 40. ornithorhynch ?' ? , o 41. tasmani $ 42. tenuirostris cJ, $,o, L 43. fecialis $ „ with one variety : aegrifossiis $ 44. australiensis $ 45. vestitus $ , o , L 46. putus (J , ? , o 47. signatus ^ > o , L . 48. unicavatus $ , o , L 49. loricatus (J, 9 „ with one variety : spinosus $ 50. coxaefiircattis $ . . . . 51. vespertilionis (J, 95 0)L Geographical distribution of the Genus Ixodes List of condemned and doubtful species of Ixodes, including their synonymy and literature, by G. H. F. Nuttall Notes on doubtful species Notes on the biology of Ixodes, by G. H. F. Nuttall with a special index and including two appendices : I. The process of copulation in Ornithodorus moubata, by G. H. F Nuttall and G. ]\lerrinian . II. On the adaptation of Ticks to the habits of their hosts, by G. H. F. Nuttall Index to valid species of Ixodes, together with a list of the collections in which the types are to be found PAOB 230 233 233 235 238 242 244 246 248 250 250 252 256 261 264 266 269 270 271 278 280 291 294 318 324 346 LIST OF ILLUSTEATIONS PLATES Plate IV. Ixodes ricinus. Fig. 1. cj, dorsum x 12. Fig. 2. (5^, „ (mounted specimen). Fig. 3. ?, » X 12. Fig. 4. $ , venter x 9. Fig. 5. o, dorsum x 12. Fig. 6. L, „ X 12. Fig. 7. Copulation. facing p. 144 Plate V. Ixodes tenuirostris and Ixodes putus. facing p. 246 Fig. 1. /. tenuirostris (J, venter. Fig. 2. „ $, „ X 11 (mounted specimen). Fig. 3. /. putus (J, dorsum x 7. Fig. 4. „ ? , „ X 7. Plate VI. Ixodes vespertilionis. feting p. 276 Fig. 1. $ (unfed), dorsum x 7. Fig. 2. ? (replete), „ Plate VII. Ixodes ricinus, females ovipositing in a glass dish, x |. facing p. 310 IN THE TEXT (Figs. 115-138 with the names of parts indicated in accordance with the generic descriptions in the text.) FIGURE PAGE 115. Illustrating Ixodes: I. ricinus ^, dorsum and venter . . . 117 116. „ ,, /. hexagonus 9 (replete), dorsum and venter . 117 117. „ „ /. cavipalpus ^, capitulum, dorsal and ventral aspects 118 List of Illustrations XV FIGURE 118. Illustrating Ixodes: I. cavipalpus $ , capitulum, dorsal and ventral aspects ...... „ /. bicornis $ , capitulum, ventral aspect Haemaphysalis : H. tcellhigtoni ^ , dorsum and venter $ , dorsum ...... Dermacentoi- : D. variegatus var. kamskadalus ^, dorsum and venter „ D. variahilis ^ i capitulum and scutum Rhipicentor : R. bicornis ^ and $ , dorsal aspects . „ R. bicornis ^, venter .... Rhipicephahis : Rh. bursa (J, dorsum „ Rh. sanguineus ^ , venter „ Rh. sirnpsoni 5 » capitulum and scutum Margaropus: M. vnnthemi ,^ , venter „ M. winthemi $ , capitulum and scutum Boophilus : B. decoloratus ^ , dorsum and venter ,, B. anmdatus $ , capitulum and scutum. Hyalomma : Hyal. aegyptium ^ , dorsum and venter „ Hyal. aegyptium $ , capitulum, dorsal and ventral aspects Amblyomma : A. cooper i ^, dorsum and venter „ A. variegatum. $, part of venter „ A. cooperi $ , dorsum 136 a and b. Digit of chelicera of Haemaphysalis pimctata, $ 137. Spiracles of 15 species of Ixodidae .... Tarsi (4th) of 10 species of Ixodidae Ixodes ncinus ^ , dorsum and venter „ „ (J, capitulum, dorsal and ventral aspects „ „ (J, tarsi 1 and 4 .... „ „ ^ and 9 ) digits and hypostomes „ „ 5 , dorsum, part of venter, etc. „ „ 5) capitulum, dorsal and ventral aspects „ ,, o, dorsum aud venter „ „ o, capitulum, dorsal and ventral aspects „ ,, L, dorsum and venter „ ,, L, capitulum, dorsal and ventral aspects Ixodes ricinus var. scapidaris ^ i capitulum and scutum, part of venter, etc Ixodes nigricans $ , essential parts .... 151. Ixodes acuminatus $ , venter ..... 152. „ ,, 9, hypostome and digit 153. Ixodes dentatus $ , capitulum, ventral aspect . 154. „ „ ? , coxae and trochanters . 155. Ixodes minor ^, venter 156. ,, „ (J, venter 157. „ „ S, basis capituli, dorsal aspect . 119. 120. 121. 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. 127. 128. 129. 130. 131. 132. 133. 134. 135 a. 135 b. 138. 139. 140. 141. 142. 143. 144. 145. 146. 147. 148. 149. 150. 118 118 119 120 120 121 121 122 122 122 123 123 124 124 125 125 126 126 126 128 131 132 148 149 149 149 150 150 151 152 153 153 157 160 161 161 163 163 164 164 165 XVI List of Illustrations FIGURE 158. Ixodes 159. )» 160. Ixodes 161. » 162. » 163. Ixodes 164. j> 165. Ixodes 166. » 167. Ixodes 168. Ixodes 169. Ixodes 170. n 171. Ixodes 172. >> 173. 175. 176. >) 177. J? 178. Ixodes 179. Ixodes 180. Ixodes 181. ■)■> 182. Ixodes 183. „ 184. Ixodes 185. 186. 187. Ixodes 188. 189. minor ^, hypostome . „ $ , essential parts holiviensis ^, dorsum, venter, hypostome, spiracle, tarsus 4 „ $ , capitulum and scutum, part of venter, spiracle ,, o, dorsum, venter, tarsus 4 . fuscipes 9 , capitulum and scutum, capitulum in ventral aspect, coxae, spiracle and tarsus 4 . „ 5 J capitulum and scutum, coxae with part of capitulum ...... spinicoxalis $ , basis capituli and scutum, coxae with par of capitulum .... „ $ , hypostome ...... marxi $ , capitulum and scutum, part of venter, etc. . pratti 9) capitulum and scutum, capitulum in ventral aspect coxae, spiracle and tarsus 4 . ncbidus 5 , dorsum, part of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 „ o, capitulum and scutum, part of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 ..... hexagonus (J, dorsum and venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 „ 9 , (gorged), dorsum and venter, spiracle an< tarsus 4 „ 9 ) capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 . „ $ , capitulum, dorsal, ventral and lateral aspects „ 9 5 tarsi 1 and 4, highly magnified „ o , capitulum and scutum, part of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 .... . „ L, dorsum, venter, tarsus 3, hypostome . nitens $ , capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 ...... . hicornis $ , part of venter, hypostome .... auritulus ^ > capitulum in ventral and dorsal aspects, with scutum 5) ? > hypostome ....... hrunneus $ , capitulum and scutum, coxae, capitulum in ventral aspect ..... „ $ , digit, hypostome, ventral aspect of basis capituli with coxae I .... . cavipalpus ^ , dorsum, capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects „ ^ and $ , spiracles and digits „ $ , capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects angustus ^, dorsum and venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 „ 9 > capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 .... . „ o, capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 PAGK 165 166 167 168 168 169 169 172 172 173 174 176 176 178 179 180 180 180 181 181 185 186 188 188 191 191 193 193 194 195 196 197 List of Illustrations xvii FIGURE 190. Ixodes 191. Ixodes 192. 193. >' 194. Ixodes 195. Ixodes 196. Ixodes 197. Ixodes 198. J) 199. Ixodes 200. Ixodes 201. 55 202. Ixodes 203. )5 204. 55 205. 55 206. 55 207. 55 208. 55 209. 55 210. Ixodes 211. 212. Ixodes 213. Ixodes 214. 215. Ixodes 216. 55 217. Ixodes 218. 55 219. 55 220. 55 221. 55 222. Ixodes 223. 55 224. Ixodes angustus L, dorsum, venter, tarsus 3 .... . caledonicus 9 5 capitukun and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 ..... . „ o, capituhnn and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 ...... „ L, capitulum, scutum, coxae, tarsus 3, anal grooves fossiilatus 9 , capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 acutitarsus 9 ) dorsum, digit, coxae .... gigas ^, dorsum and venter ...... rubieundv^ cJ, venter, hypostome ..... ,, 9 1 capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, etc. simplex 9 5 ca[)itulum and scutum ..... japonensis 9 5 capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects . ,, 9 5 tlofsal and ventral aspects of the body, spiracle and tarsus 4 . . . . canisuga ^, dorsum and venter .... „ ^, capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects 55 ^5 hypostome ^5 legs 1-4 „ 9 , capitulum and scutum, capitulum in ventral aspect . . ... ,, 9 , (gorged), venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 „ o , capitulum and scutum, part of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 .... „ L, dorsum, venter, tarsus 3 . texanus 9 5 capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 . . . . „ 9 5 capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 .... stilesi 9 5 capitulum and scutum, palp in profile, digit neumanni 9 5 capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 . . . . „ o, capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 . . . . percavatus 9 s capitulum and scutum ,, 9 5 f'^'i'e part of venter .... pilosus (^, dorsum and venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 „ 9 5 dorsum (without capitulum), venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 ..... ,, 9 5 capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects „ o , dorsum and venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 „ L, dorsum and venter, tarsus 3 and digit lunatiis 9 5 dorsum ....... „ 9 5 venter ....... rasus (^, venter, digit, hypostome .... PAGE 197 199 200 200 201 202 204 205 206 208 209 209 210 211 211 211 212 212 213 213 215 215 217 218 219 220 220 222 223 224 224 225 227 227 228 XVlll List of Illustrations FIGUKE 225. Ixodes 226. »5 227. Ixodes 228. )) 229. Ixodes 230. Ixodes 231. 11 232. 11 233. Ixodes 234. 11 235. 236. Ixodes 237. 11 328. 11 239. Ixodes 240. 11 241. Ixodes 242. 11 243. )) 244. )> 245 rt and b. 246. Ixodes 247. Ixodes 248. 11 249. 11 250. Ixodes 251. 11 252. 11 253. 11 254. Ixodes 255. 11 256. 11 257. 11 258. 11 259. 11 260. 11 rasics ? , dorsum, venter, tarsus 4, spiracle aud figures showing variability .... „ $ , digit, hypostome, tarsi 1 and 4 ugandanus $, venter, hypostome . „ $ , capitulum and scutum cordifer (J, venter, tarsus 4 . holocyclits (J, venter, hypostome . „ 5 , capitulum and scutum, venter (replete), hypo stome ....... „ o , capitulum in dorsal aspect schillingsi (^ , venter, tarsus 4, digit .... „ $ , capitulum and scutum, venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 „ o , capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 ornithorhynchi $ , (two specimens) dorsum and venter, spiracle „ 5 ) tarsi 1 and 4 ?, digit, hypostome. tasmani $ , capitulum and scutum, hypostome, end of tarsus 1 with foot . „ $ , dorsum, venter, spiracle tenuirostris $, capitulum 11 6i P*''^ of venter . „ $ , capitulum and scutum „ $ , ventral aspect of capitulum, with coxae I Ixodes fecialis $ , capitulum and scutum, ventral aspect of capitulum with coxae I fecialis var. aegrifossus $, capitulum and scutum australiensis $ , capitulum and scutum, capitulum in ventral aspect ...... ,j 5 » venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 J, 5 1 ventral aspect of capitulum and coxae I vestitus 5 , capitulum and scutum 11 ? 1 capitulum in ventral aspect, and essential parts „ o, dorsum, parts of venter, leg 4, etc. „ L, dorsum, venter, leg 3 putus Si dorsum, venter, side view, hypostome, spiracle „ 5, dorsum, venter, side view of palp, spiracle tarsus 4 .... „ $, dorsum „ $, capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects „ 5 , scutum, digit, hypostome, tarsus 4 11 ? 5 spiracle „ o , capitulum and scutum, capitulum in ventral aspect, coxae with trochanters, spiracle, tarsus 4 229 230 231 232 234 235 237 238 239 240 241 243 243 243 245 245 246 246 247 247 249 249 251 251 251 253 254 255 255 257 258 258 259 259 259 259 List of TllnMrations XIX 261. Ixodes signatus 5 , capitulum and scutum, capitulum in ventral aspect, palp in jjrofile, coxae, spiracle, tarsi 1 and 4, hypostome .... 262 262. „ „ 5 ) venter of gorged specimen 262 263. ,, „ o , capitulum and scutum, capitulum in ventral aspect, coxae, anal groove, spiracles and tarsus 4 263 264. „ ,, L, capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, tarsus 3 263 265. Ixodes unicavatus 9 ? capitulum and scutum ..... 265 266. „ „ o , capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 ..... . 265 267. ,, ,, L, capitulum and scutum, jjarts of venter and tarsus 3 ...... . 265 268. Ixodes loricatus ^, dorsum and venter ...... 267 269. „ „ 5 ) capitulum in dorsal aspect .... 267 270. Ixodes loricatus var. spinosus ^ , capitulum, scutum, jjarts of venter, etc. 269 271. Ixodes coxaefurcatus (^ , dorsum, venter, sj^iracle, tarsus 4 . . 270 272. Ixodes vespertilionis ^, venter ........ 273 273. „ „ (^, capitulum in dorsal aspect .... 273 274. „ „ (J, digit and hypostome 273 275. „ „ c?, leg 1 273 276. „ „ ^, foot 273 277. ,, „ ? , capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 . . . 274 278. „ „ $ , hypostome and digit 274 279. „ ,, $ , capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects . 274 280. „ „ o, capitulum and scutum, parts of venter, spiracle and tarsus 4 . . . . 275 281. „ „ L, capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects, with scutum, coxae and tarsus 3 . 275 282. „ „ L, digit 275 283. Hypostome of Ixodes ricinus $, taken whilst copulating . . 305 284-287. Process of oviposition in Ixodes ricinus 309 288. Ornithodorus mouhata $, with empty spermatophore attached to vulva 319 289. A series of eggs of different species of Ixodoidea to show their relative sizes 330 290-299. Hypostomes of Argasidae compared 332 300-307. „ „ Ixodidae „ 343 105 SECTION I THE CLASSIFICATION OF TICKS. I. Historical Review of the Subject ^ Although the classification of ticks may be considered as dating from Linnaeus (1746, p. 479), who included them under Acari in the large genus Acarus, scientific nomenclature did not actually commence until the time of Latreille. This author (1795, p. 15) called the Acari " tiques " and divided them into 11 genera of which two were Ai^gas and Ixodes. Later (1804, p. 46) he included these two genera with five others {Sarcoptes, Uropoda, etc.) under Riciniae. Hermann (1804, p. 63) included Rhynchoprion (Argas) and Gynorhaestes (Ixodes) under Acarina, but kept them far apart, not recognizing their close relationship. Leach (1815, p. 387) called the Acarina Monomerosornata., and divided them into 11 families, one of which, Ixodides, included Argas, Ixodes and Europoda. He was succeeded by von Heyden (1826, p. 608), who upset previous classifications and again separated Argas from Ixodes. Sundevall (1833) divided the Acari into six families, one of which, Ixodides, included ticks only, viz. Argas and Ixodes. DuGfes (1834, p. 5) divided the group into seven families, one of which, Ixodei, included Ixodes, and Gamasei included Argas. C. L. Koch (1844, p. 220 ; 1847, p. 13) ranked ticks in a special order distinct from the Acari, naming the order Ricini, which included three families: 1. Argasiden (Argasides, in English, with two genera: Argas and Ornithodoros) ; 2. Ixodiden (Ixodide.*^, in English, with four genera : Hyalomma, Haemalastor, Amblyomma and Ixodes) ; and 3. Rhipi- stomiden (with four genera: Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Rhipistoma and Rliipicephalus) ; families 2 and 3 were distinguished from each other by the possession of long and short palps respectively. Koch's classification was generally adopted by subsequent authors, and has ^ A number of classical authors refer to ticks. See Bibliography under Aristotle, Cato, Varro, Columella, Pliny, Sammonius, Aldi'ovandi. N. I, 8 106 Olassijication stood the test of time, with some modifications, better than any other which has been advanced. Gervais (in Walckenaer and Gervais, 1844, p. 229), however, at the same period, divided Acarina simply into seven genera, of which one genus, Ixodes, included all the ticks. Nicolet (1855, p, 381) divided aerial and terrestrial (in contrast to aquatic) mites into five groups, one of which was Ixodides. FiJRSTENBERG (1861, p. 208) took over the classification of ticks from C. L. Koch, without making any change. Donnadieu (1875) included Argas under Ixodides. Mi^gnin (1876 a, p. 293; 1877, p. 86; 1880, p. 117; and 1892, p. 25) gave the Ixodides as one of eleven divisions of Acarina. Murray (1877, p. 185) divided mites into eight families, of which one, family 5, was the Ixodidae. Kramer (1877, p. 215) likewise gave ticks family rank under the name Ixodidae, and Michael (1883, p. 50) includes Argas in the family Ixodidae. Canestrini and Fanzago (1877, p. 110) divided the family Ixodini into four genera : Ixodes, Hyalomma, Haemaphysalis and Rhipicephalus. Karsch (1879, p. 96) established the genus Margaropus. Canestrini (1890, p. 491) subsequently divided the family Ixodidae (or Ixodinae) into three groups: I. Poliopli, with almost the whole venter "'' coraz- zato," i.e. covered by chitinous plates, literally " cuirassed " (one genus : Ixodes), II. Tetraopli, with four adanal shields (two genera: Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus), III. Anopli, with naked venter (two genera : Dermacentor and Haemaphysalis). Ordered according to the structure of the palps, he divided the Ixodidae into two sections : A. Cultri- palpi (Genera Ixodes and Hyalomma), and B. Conipalpi (Genera Phaulixodes^ [Berlese], Rhipicephalus, Dermacentoi' , Haemaphysalis and Herpetobia^ [Canestrini]). He confined his classification to the Italian ticks, of which he had a personal knowledge. Canestrini (1892, p. 563) places ticks under Acaroidea as an order Metastigmata comprising two families: 1. Ixodidae, 2. Argasidae. Marx (1892a, p. 233) follows, in a measure, the classification of C. L. Koch, but substitutes Cynorhaestea for Ricini (Ricinus being preoccupied), and ranks Cynorhaestea as a suborder instead of an order; he divided the suborder into two tribes, or groups : I. Catastomata, comprising two families : 1. Argasidae (with two genera : Argas and Ornithodoros), and 2. Eschatocephalidae (provisionally forming a "connecting link between the two tribes ") ; and 11. Antistomata, comprising three families: 1. Haemalastoridae (with two genera: Haemalastor and ' Since condemned, recognized as nymphal forms : Phaulixodes = Rhipicephalus, Herpetobia = Haemaphysalis. Classification 107 Sai'conyssus), 2. Ixodidae (with three genera: Ixodes, Amblyomnia and Hyalomma), 3. Rhipistomidae (with five genera: Boophilus, Rhipi- cephalus, Dermacentor, Rhipistonui and Haemaphysalis). Soon after- wards, Banks (1894, p. 209) established the superfatnily Ixodoidea, which we retain in this work. Neumann (1896, p. 2) placed ticks (Ixodides) as a family in the order Acari, and divided them into two subfamilies : I. Argasinae (with two genera: Argas and Ornithodoros), and II. Ixodinae ; he sub- sequently (1897, p. 325 and 1899, p. 107) recognized three tribes under Ixodinae : Tribe 1. Ixodae (= Cultripalpi of Canestrini, including four genera: Ixodes, Hyalomma, Amblyomma and Aponomma); Tribe 2, Rhipicephalae (= Conipalpi of Canestrini, including three genera : Rhipicephalus, Dei^macentor and Haemaphysalis); and Tribe 3 to include Haemalastor. By Haemalastor he meant to refer to forms like Ixodes vespertilionis, of which there are many bad species ; he, however (1899, p. 166), recognised its close affinity to Ixodae, except for the structure of the j/" capitulum, and gives Haemalastor only generic rank after Ixodes. He founded the genus Aponomma (1899, p. 180) to include Amblyomraa-like forms, differing from Amblyomma in not possessing eyes, and in having broader bodies, besides occurring almost exclusively on Ophidia and Saiiria. Neumann (1901, p. 318) briefly reviews the subject of classification, and notes the fact that C. L. Koch and himself were the only authors who based their classi- fications upon an extended study of actual specimens. He (p. 321) condemns Phaidixodes Berlese and Herpetobia Canestrini ; Haemalastor Koch is referred to Hyalomma ; Sarconyssus Kolenati is referred to Eschatocephalus Frauenfeld; (p. 276) Boophilus Curtice is united to Rhipicephalus; Rhipistoma Koch and Opisthodon Canestrini, Gonixodes Duges are included under Haemaphysalis ; Caris Latreille, Crotonus Dumeril, Cynorhaestes Hermann are referred to as " des synonymes plus ou moins precis d' Eschatocephalus et di' Ixodes"; Pseudixodes ^a\\ev is referred to Dermacentor; Ophiodes Murray falls into synonymy {= Apo- nomma), Xiphiastor Murray, and Adenopleura Macalister are condemned as undeterminable, being possibly Amblyomma spp. ; Margaropus Karsch is stated to be nothing more " qu'un individu anormal de Rhipicephalus annidatus (Say) var. microplus." After thus clearing the ground of a good deal of lumber, he (p. 322) reiterates that he is in agreement with most zoologists in regarding the Ixodidae as merely a family of the order Acarina, and he divides the family into ten genera which he groups into two subfamilies : I. Ixodinae divided into two tribes : 8-2 108 Classification 1. Ixodae (Genera Ixodes, Eschatocephalus, Aponomma, Amhlyomma aud Hyalonima), 2. Rhipicephalae (Genera Haemaphy sails, Rhipicephcdus a.nd Dej'macentor); and II. Argasinae (Genera J.?'^as and Ornithodoros). Salmon and Stiles (1901, p. 384), whilst following Neumann with regard to the grouping of the various genera, raise the ticks to the rank of a superfaraily, as had been done by Banks. They simply raise Neumann's subfamilies and tribes to the rank of families and sub- families respectively. Their classification is as follows : Snperfamily Ixodoidea comprising two families : I. Argasidae (Genera Argas and Ornithodoros), and II. Ixodidae, including two subfamilies : 1. Rhipicephalinae^ (Genera Rhipicephalus, Boophilus, Haemaphy salis and Dermacentor), and 2. Ixodinae (Genera Ixodes, Eschatocephalus, Aponomma, Amhlyomma and Hyalomma). Neumann next (1902, p. 115) established the genus Geratixodes. In 1904, p. 444, he created the subgenus Euixodes, to include all Ixodes other than Geratixodes and Eschatocephalus, both of which were degraded to subgenera. (We include all of these in the one genus Ixodes in this work, see pp. 133-135, and do not see a valid reason for retaining the subgenera.) Neumann (1904, p. 444) attempted, further, to order the genera of his subfamily Ixodinae according to their real affinities, a task, as we have seen, previously attempted by Canestrini (1890), and Marx (1892). Nevertheless, the original order adopted by C. L. Koch (1844), depending upon the relative length of the palps, had hitherto been generally accepted, and was until now retained by Neumann. As pointed out by Neumann (1904, p. 445), the relative length of a single structure like the capitulum does not give a safe basis for classification, since, in the absence of •type specimens for purposes of comparison, it leaves too much to the personal judgment of the naturalist in defining what is "long" and what is "short." Although of undoubted use, the division of Ixodinae into the two tribes mentioned is unnatural and misleading, since it leads to misconceptions regarding the real relationships existing between the genera. Thus Ixodes and Hyalomma, included in Tribe 1, are not nearly so closely related as Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus, the latter serving as the type of Tribe 2. Moreover, the presence or absence of eyes, whilst of generic value, is of no value as a means of ordering the genera according to their affinities, ^ Lahille (1905, p. 12) remarks that the subfamily should be styled Dermacentorinae aud not Rhipicephalinae, if the rules of nomenclature are to be strictly adhered to, for Dermacentor (Koch, 1844, p. 235) has priority over Rhipicephalus (Koch, 1844, p. 238). Classification 109 for it brings Ixodes, Aponomma and Haemaphysalis together on the one hand, and Amhlyomma, Hyalomma, Rhipicephalus and Dermacentor on the other. Neumann considers it essential to take as a basis of chxssification some external feature which is determined by a difference in anatomical structure. Such a feature is to be found in the grooves on the ventral surface. This would lead us back to the principle adopted by Canestrini {vide supra), who was struck by the affinities existing between Hyalomma and Rhipicephalus. Canestrini did not include Amhlyomma and Aponomma under his Anopli, because he confined himself to genera occurring in Italy, Neumann agrees that Canestrini's groups Poliopli and Tetraopli are homogeneous, but that this does not hold for the group Anopli, which includes Amhlyomma {Aponomma'^), Dermacentor and Haemaphysalis. {Amhlyomma and Aponomma are obviously allied, but Dermacentor and Haemaphysalis remain disconnected.) Neumann attempted to represent the supposed affinities between the different genera by the following plan, wherein the position and length of the connecting lines indicate approximately the degrees of affinity : Ixodes Haemaphysalis Hyalomma Amblyomma Aponomraa I I Rhipicephalus — ■ — Dermacentor Neumann adopts Canestrini's groups as sections in the subfamily Ixodinae, substituting names derived from type genera for the cor- responding names given by Canestrini, thus : Section I. Ixodeae (for Poliopli). „ 2. Rhipicephaleae (for Tetraopli). „ 3. Amhlyommeae (for Anopli). Neumann characterizes the sections as fullows : 1. Ixodeae : ^ venter entirely covered by shields. Anal groove contouring the anus in front and independent of the genital grooves. Eyes absent. Capitulum elongate. 2. Rhipicephaleae : (/ venter bearing two adanal shields, usually acciimpanied by accessory shields. Anal groove contouring the anus behind and usually joining the genital grooves in front. Eyes present. Capitulum long or short. 3. Amblyommeae : ^ venter devoid of shields. Anal groove as under 2. Eyes often present. Capitulum as under 2. ^ We regard Aponomma as simply a subgenus oi Amhlyomma. 110 Classification Neumann (1907 a, p. 26), in his latest paper in which he deals with classification, includes the following genera under the various sections above mentioned : I. Ixodeae (Ixodes), II. Rhipicephaleae (Rhipicepha- lus, Margaropus^, Hyalomma), and III. Amblyommeae {Amhlyomyna, Dermacentor, Aponomma, Haemaphysalis). Lahille (1905, pp. 11 et seq.) places ticks in a suborder, Arpagostoma", comprising two families : I. Argasidae, and II. Ixodidae ; he divides the latter into three groups according to the c^s: Group 1. Anopli (without ventral plates) including four genera: Aponomma and Neumanniella (eyeless = anommata) and Amblyomma and Dermacentor (ommata); Group 2. Artiopli (with an even number of ventral plates) including three genera : Hyalomma, Rliipicephalus and Boophilus (all possessing eyes) ; and, finally. Group 8. Perissopli (with five ventral plates), comprising three genera : Ixodes, Eschatocephalus and Ceratixodes (anommata). Lahille (p. 16) founded the genus Neumanniella, of which more presently, to include Ixodes transversalis Lucas, 184-4 ; 1845, p. 61, PI. I, Fig. 3 = Aponomma transversale (Lucas) Neumann, 1899, p. 188, Fig. 42. Warburton (vii. 1907, p. 90) proposed the following classification: IXODOIDEA Argasidae Ixodidae I , . _j Prostriata Metastriata . I 1 Brevirostrata Longirostrata I 1 I 1 Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2 Argas Ixodes Haemaphysalis Dermacentor Hyalomma Amblyomma Oruithodoros^ Rhipicentor* Aponomma Rhipicephalus Margaropus Boophilus Among the Ixodidae he separated widely Ixodes from the other genera as Prostriata, which refers to the anal grooves surrounding the anus in front, whereas in all the other genera the anal groove curves about the anus posteriorly. The latter are grouped under Metastriata, and are divided into two sections : Brevirostrata and Longirostrata, according as they possess a short or long capitulum ; and each section naturally falls into two groups, as indicated above. Banks (vili. 1907, ^ Meaning Boophihis Curtice, and including Margaropus Karsch. - Should be Harpagostoiita (from barpagon = a grappling iron). 3 We have not hitherto adopted the latinized transcription Ornitliodorus but shall do so henceforth in accordance with the rules laid down in The International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. * Since added. Classification 111 p. G2, as stated in Banks, 1908, pp. 13, 14) advanced another classifica- tion. He divides Ixodidae into two subfamilies : I. Ixodinae {Ixodes and Ceratixodes^), having the anal groove in front of the anus, and, II. Amblyomminae (including the other genera of ticks) having the anal groove posterior to the anus. He divides the Amblyomminae into four tribes as follows : 1. Rhipicephalini (including lihipicephcdus and Margaropus). 2. Haemaphysalini {Haemaphysalis). 3. DermaceiUorini {Dermacentor). 4. Amblyommiiii {Amhlyomma, Aponomma and Hyalomma). DONITZ (1907 a, pp. 1-8, reprint) re-established the genus Margaropus Karsch, 1879, which Neumann (1901, p. 281) had regarded as a monstrosity of " Rhipicephalus amudatus var. micropla." Neumann has never recognized the genus Boophilus Curtice ; he continued to include Boophilus under Rhipicephalus until he became convinced of the validity of the genus Margaropus, when he concluded that it had priority over Boophilus. Since then, he has referred species of Boophilus to Margaropus, but as we shall see, both genera are perfectly distinct and valid. NUTTALL and Warburton (1907, p. 398) founded the genus Rhipicentor. DoNiTZ (1910, p. 400) passes under review the recent attempts at classification by Neumann, Lahille, Warburton and Banks. He agrees with us in condemning Eschatocephalus and Geratixodes and referring them to Ixodes, and he also recognizes the genera Boophilus and Margaropus as distinct. He condemns Neumanniella Lahille, 1905, until there is better reason for recognizing such a genus. It will be remembered that Neumann (1899, p. 188) stated that Aponomma transversale (Lucas) Neumann possessed no anal groove, and might, consequently, be referred to another genus if another species resembling it were found. Lahille, however, founded the genus Neumanniella without ever having seen the types. Donitz denies that we know enough of the relationship existing between the genera (apart from Ixodes) grouped under Ixodidae to reach any final conclusions regarding their arrangement in respect to each other; it is possible that differences of internal structure may prove of help in the future. He prefers, in a measure, the older classification of Neumann which arose out of that originally advanced by Koch. Koch, as we have seen, divided ticks 1 Made a subgenus by Neumann, 1904, and now suppressed by us and by Donitz, 1910. 11*2 Classification into three families : Argasidae, Ixodidae (with long palps) and Rhipi- stomidae (with short palps). The relative length of these structures is certainly convenient in the practical work of determination. Banks (1908, p. 12) objects to too much weight being laid on the relative length of the palps, partly on the ground that it hardly permits us to "distinguish some species of Amblyoinma from Dermacentor." DoNlTZ does not approve of Neumann's subsequent adoption (1904) of the plan of Canestrini (1890), the latter's Poliopli, Tetraopli and Anopli corresponding to Ixodeae, Rhipicephaleae and Amblyomnieae of Neumann. As Doriitz points out, Ambli/omma are not Anopli ; a number possess small chitinous plates^ (analogous to the plates in Ixodes) situated posteriorly upon the ventral surface. Again, Mar- garopus has a ventral plate corresponding to the median plate in Ixodes, but Margaropus, by its general structure, is allied to BoophiliLS and Rhqncephalus, i.e. Tetraopli (Rhipicephaleae), and not to Poliopli (Ixodeae). Banks (1908, p. 13) very properly criticizes the classification of Lahille (190o), which is based on the characteristics of the (f, and thus separates Hyalomnia widely from Amhlyomma, most authors agreeing that they are allied, the $s being at times difficult to distinguish. Banks fails to see "the importance of secondary sexual characters " which lead to Lahille's classification, and considers that they " are certainly not of sufficient value to characterize groups higher than genera and are better employed for groups of lesser rank." DoNiTZ (1910, p. 401) likewise objects to Lahille's classification on the ground already stated that Amhlyomma are not Anopli, and that Margaropus would be classed as Perissopli, whereas they are closely related to Artiopli. He agrees with Warburton and with Banks in separating the genus Ixodes widely from the other genera, because of the structure of the anal groove, apart from other important differences. Donitz (p. 403) divides the Ixodidae into three divisions ; I. Ixodeae (one genus, Ixodes), II. Amblyommeae (=Longirostrata of Warburton, with three genera : Amhlyomma, Aponomma, Hyalomma), and III. Rhipice- phaleae (=Brevirostrata of Warburton, with six genera: Rhipicephalus, Boophilus, Margaropus, Dermacentor, Rhipicentor and Haemaphysalis). Banks (1908, pp. 13, 14) does not agree with the classification of Warburton in so far as the latter places Dermacentor with Rhipicephalus. Banks considers this ill-advised, and places Dermacentor close to Am- hlyomma. The genus Rhipicentor Nuttall and Warburton, 1907, however, directly links Rhipiceplialus to Dermucentor, as is indicated by the 1 " Plaques" in our desciiptions, see Fig. 135a. Ixodoidea 113 name, and the discovery of this intermediate type confirms the view advanced by Warburton. Banks agrees with us in not placing Hijalomma near Rhipicephalus, as has been done by Neumann (1907 a, p. 26). Summar]/. The perusal of the foregoing account of the views held by different authors who have written upon the classification of ticks, shows that a great deal of confusion has undoubtedly existed. At a fairly early date, the Argasid and Ixodid ticks were recognized as possessing very distinctive features. The confusion that has arisen is mainly due to efforts in classifying the Ixodidae. The proposal to separate the latter into two distinct sections (Warburton, Banks) is based on anatomical grounds, i.e. the structure of the anal groove in the Prostriata in conti^ast to the Metastriata. In some ticks (Boophilus, Margaropus) the anal groove may be obsolete ; they are, however, obviously related to other metastriate forms in general structure. It appears advisable, only as a matter of convenience, to give these sections the new names (suggested by Warburton), in view of the great confusion of subfamily, tribal, group, and other names, all of which have been based on the original generic names. The division of the Metastriata into Brevirostrata and Longirostrata is also one of convenience, and their subdivision into two groups each follows naturally when the characters of the genera are taken as a whole. With regard to the genus Neumanniella Lahille, 1905, to which reference has been made in the preceding pages, we would state that we have examined the types of Ixodes transversalis Lucas and agree witii Neumann in retaining the species under Aponomma. On very careful examination we have detected traces of an anal groove posterior to the anus. Consequently the genus Neumanniella falls into synonymy. Superfamily IXODOIDEA Banks, 1894. Synonymy and Literature : Genus Acarus (in part) Linnaeus, 1746, p. 479. Family Riciniae (in part) Latreille, 1804, p. 46 ; 1806, p. 151 ; 1829, p. 286. Risso, 1826, p. 180. Oudemans, 1896, p. 191. Family Ixodides Leach, 1815, p. 396 (includes Europoda). Sundevall, 1833. Fuller, 1896, p. 763. Family Ixodea Burmeister, 1837, p. 579. Grube, 1859, p. 455. Gerstaecker, 1860, p. 464. 114 Ixodoidea Order Ricini Koch, 1844 ; also 1847, p. 5. Fiirstenberg, 1861, p. 208. Canestrini, 1890, p. 482. Genus Ixodes Gervais, in Walckenaer and Gervais, 1844, p. 229. Family Ixodida Kiichenmeister, 1855, p. 421. Kolenati, 1857, p. 19. Group Ixodides Nicolet, 1855 (cited by Michael, 1883-1887). Family Ixodidae Leach, in Gerstaecker, 1863, p. 343 ; 1873, p. 464. Murray, 1877, p. 185. Conil, 1877, p. 28. Kramer, 1877. Glaus, 1880, p. 652. Michael, 1883, p. 50. Berlese, 1885, p. 131. Ludwig, 1886, p. 612. Riley, 1887, p. 744. Marx, 1892, p. 232. Trouessart, 1892, p. 28. Neumann, 1892 b, p. 94. Railliet, 1893, p. 631. Braun, 1895, p. 257. Osborn, 1896, p. 255. Ward, 1900 (a), p. 193, and {b\ p. 430. Neumann, 1901, p. 322. Stiles and Hassall, 1901, p. 1. Neumann, 1904, p. 444. Lahille, 1905, p. 16. Wheler, 1906, p. 400. Pocock, 1907, p. 190. Donitz, 1907, p. 1. Neumann, 1907 a, p. 26. Newstead, Dutton and Todd, 1907, p. 99. Bonnet, 1908, p. 247. Blanchard, 1909, p. 80. Family Ixodides Donnadieu, 1875. Megnin, 1876 a, p. 293; 1877, p. 86; 1880, p. 117 ; 1892, p. 25. Railliet, 1886, p. 495 ; 1895, p. 703. Neumann, 1888, p. 82 ; 1892 a, p. 90 ; 1896, p. 1 ; 1897, p. 324; 1899, p. 107 ; and subsequently to 1910. Blanchard, 1890, p. 322 ; 1909, p. 5. Brumpt, 1910, p. 510. Order Metastigmata Canestrini, 1892, p. 563. Suborder Cynorhaestea Marx, 1892, p. 233. Suborder Arpagostoma Lahille, 1905, p. 11. (Should be Harpagostoma.) Superfamily Ixodoidea Banks, 1894, p. 209. Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 383. Warburton, 1907, p. 90. Banks, 1907, p. 62, and 1908, p. 7. Nuttall, Warburton, Cooper and Robinson, 1908, p. 1 (Part I of this work). Castellani, 1910, p. 460. Superfamily Characters. Acari of the suborder Metastigmata {the breathing apertures being somewhat posteriorly situated) charac- terized by the possession of a movable false head, or capitidum, of a special structure. It consist?, of a basal portion {basis capituli), a pair of palps, protrusible chelicei'ae with digits serrate externally, and a rigid hypostome almost always toothed on its ventral surface. All are blood- sucking mites, parasitic on animals. N.B. The Acarina, or Mites, arc divided into the suborders Vermiformia, Astigmata, Metastigmata, Helerostigmata, Prostigmata, Notostigmata. Besides the Ixodoidea, the Metastigmata include the Onhatidae and the Gamasidae. The only mites in the least likely to be confounded with the Ixodoidea are the remarkable group of Gekobiidae, parasitic on lizards. Their mouth-parts strongly resemble those of the ticks, but they belong to the suborder Prostigmata, having their breathing orifices near the palps. The Ixodoidea are divided into two families, I. the Argasidae (see Part 1) and II. the Ixodidae. Ixodidae 115 II. Family IXODIDAE Murray, 1877. Synonymy and Literature: Family Ixodei Diigfes, 1834 n, p. 15; 1834 c, p. 33. Family Ixodiden Koch, 1844, p. 220; 1847, p. 13. Furstenberg, 1861, p. 208. Family Ixodidds Gervais and van Beneden, 1859, p. 460. Family Ixodidae Murray, 1877, p. 185. Pavesi, 1884, p. 483. Canestrini, 1890, p. 530 ; 1892, pp. 5G3, 581 ; 1897, p. 468. Trouessart, 1892, p. 22. Supino, 1897 a, p. 241. Pocock, 1900 a, p. 48. Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 384. Banks, 1905, p. 42. Lahille, 1905, pp. 11 ei! seq. Banks, 1907, p. 62. Hunter and Hooker, 1907, p. 46. Manson, 1907, p. 205. Warburton, 1907, p. 89. Banks, 1908, pp. 12 et seq. Nuttall, Warburton, Cooper and Robinson, 1908, p. 1. Donitz, 1910, p. 400. Stiles, 1910, p. 12. Family Ixodini Canestrini and Fanzago, 1877, p. 110. Canestrini, 1890, pp. 475, 491 ; 1892, p. 558. Family Ixodinae Karsch, 1880, p. 41. Tribe Ixodid^S Megnin, 1880, p. 120. Subfamily Ixodidae Berlese, 1885, p. 131. Tribe Ixodin^S Railliet, 1886, p. 495. Neumann, 1888, p. 89; 1892 a, p. 93. Subfamily Ixodinae Trouessart, 1892, p. 38. Railliet, 1895, p. 704. Neumann, 1896, p. 2 ; 1827, p. 325 ; 1899, p. 107. Ward, 1900 (a), p. 196 ; {b) p. 435. Neumann, 1904, p. 444; 1907 a, p. 26. Howard, 1908, p. 89. Blanchard, 1910, pp. 55-77. Brurapt, 1910, p. 510. Tribe Ixodinae Neumann, 1892 b, p. 96. Group or Tribe Antistomata Marx, 1892 a, p. 233, Family Characters \ Scutate ticks luith terminal capitulum and spiracles posterior to coxae IV. Sexual dimorphism marked, the males being almost entirely covered by the scutum, and incapable of great distention ; while the scutum of the distended female appears as a small shield behind the capitulum. Porose areas present on the $ capitulum. Where eyes are present they ar'e situated laterally upon the scutum. 'The fourth article of the palp is reduced to form a tactile papilla. Type genus : Ixodes. 1 In this connection refer to Explanation of Terms and Signs used in the descriptions, p. 127. 116 Classification of Ixodidae CLASSIFICATION OF THE IXODIDAE. There are nine genera: Ixodes, Haemapliysalis, Dermacentor, Rhijncentor, Rhipicephalus, Margaropus, Boophilus, Hyalomma and Amhlyomma (including the sub-genus Aponomma). They present varying degrees of affinity, which may be indicated by arranging them into groups according to the following scheme : Ixodidae I ^ — 1 Prostriata Metastriata , I . , Brevirostrata Longirostrata I — ^ n r ^ n Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2 I.I I ' 1. Ixodes 2. Haemaphysalis 3. Dermacentor 8. Hyalomma 9. Amblyomma 4. Rhipicentor (Aponomma) 5. Rhipicephalus 6. Margaropus 7. Boophihis Ixodes is clearly marked off from the other genera by a number of characteristics, of which the most striking are the anal groove sur- rounding the anus in front (Prostriata) and the absence of festoons. The remaining genera fall naturally into two divisions: the one characterized by a comparatively short, and the other by a comparatively long capitulum. Occasionally, forms are encountered which are aberrant in this respect. SECTION I. PROSTRIATA. With anal grooves surrounding the anus in front. Genus (1) Ixodes: inornate, without eyes and without festoons; spiracles round or oval ; palps and basis capituli of variable form ; coxae either unarmed, trenchant, spurred or bifid ; tarsi without spurs. Sexual dimorphism pronounced, especially with regard to the capitulum ; iii the (/ the venter is covered by non-salient plates : one pregenital, one median, one anal, two adanal and two epimeral plates. Figs. 115-119. Type species : Ixodes ricinus (Linnaeus). Ixodidae: Genus Ixodes 117 IXODES -^u/ur-U-r, Fig. 115. I. ricinns (Linn.), c? : in dorsal and ventral aspects (from Nuttall, 1908, G. H.F.N, del.). ^cuZu^i'n. Fig. 116. I. hexagomis Leach, 1815, ? (replete) : in dorsal and ventral aspects (Original, G. H. F. N. del.) 118 Ixodidae: Greniis Ixodes cii-acZ alCcc/k- 3 Fig. 117. 7. cavipalpus Nuttall and Warbnrton, 1908, c7 : capituhim in dorsal and ventral aspects (from Nutt. and Warb., G. H. F. N. del.). "y'^^jS^nr^ Fig. 118. I. cavipalpus, Nutt. and Warb., 1908, ? : capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects (from Nutt. and Warb., G. H. F. N. del.). Fig. 119. /. bicomis Neumann, 1906, ? : capitulum in ventral aspect to show auricula. (Neumann del.) Ixodidae : Gciuih Haeinap}uiHal\>^ IH) SECTION II. METASTRIATA. With anal groove contouring the anus behind. Note : In two genera, Boopliilus and Margaropns, clearly attributable to this section by their general structure, the anal groove is faint or obsolete. Any tick in which the anal groove cannot be made out may with safety be referred to the Metastriata. (a) Brevirost7'ata. Group 1. Genus (2) Haemaphysalis : inornate, without eyes hut with festoons; with usually short conical jmlps whose second articles pro- ject laterally beyond the basis capituli, which is rectangular dorsally. With dorsal process on first trochanter. Usually of small size and but slightly chitinized. Sexual dimorphism slight. The (/ shows no ventral plates or shields. Spiracles in . 142 (mouth-parts). — 1902. Neumann, p. 115 (genus Eschatocephalv^ ^ Inaccessible, cite^ in bibliography by Salmon and Stiles, 1901. '^ 0 denotes that the paper contains nothing worth noting. 134 Genus Ixodes maintained^ and that of Ceratixodes created). — 1904. Neumann, p. 444 {Ixodes to include 3 subgenera : Eidxod.es, Ceratixodes and Eschatocephahis, vide infra). — 1905. Lahille, pp. 12, 28 (classification). — 1906. Neumann, p. 195 (coitus and sexual dimorphism). — 1907. Donitz, p. 88 (useful) ; Pocock, p. 190 (classification) ; Himter and Hooker, p. 54. — 1908. Nuttall, pp. 385 et seq. (structure, biology, oviposition) ; Bonnet, p. 253 (descriptions condensed from Neumann ; figures original, but poor) : Banks, p. 55 ; Howard, p. 92. — 1909. Rohr, p. 135 (quotes Neumann, also with regard to species enumerated); Blanchard, pp. 80 et seq. (brief descriptions and lists of species, largely drawn from Neumann and other authors since). — 1910. Donitz, pp. 400, 432 (classifi- cation discussed) ; Stiles, pp. 12-17 (classification) ; Brumpt, Fig. 353 (copulation). Cynorhaestes Hermann, 1804, p. 66 {pro parte) and subsequent authors. — 1826, Risso, p. 183 ; Heydeu, p. 610. — 1831, Treviranus, p. 188, after which the name fell into synonymy. (Referred to as Cynorrhaestes Hermann by Fabricius, 1805, p. 351, and Dug5s, 1834 c, p. 33; as Cynoraesthes by Latreille, 1829, p. 287 ; as Cynochaestes by Meguin, 1880, p. 120 ; as Cynorhoestes by Trouessart, 1891, p. 290.) Crotonus Dumeril, 1822, p. 56. — 1829, p. 401 (C. ricinus = I. ricinus (Linn.)). Haemalastor Koch, 1844, p. 223 ; 1847, p. 49 (type, H. longirostris). Used partly as equivalent to Esckatocephalus {vide infra) by Kolenati, 1857, p. 437 ; 1860, p. 578 ; Karsch, 1880, pp. 141 et seq. ; Megnin, 1880, p. 120 {Haemalostor) [sic\; and Neumann, 1899, p. 178. Note : Haemalastor was established by C. L. Koch to include one species {longirostris), of which he only knew the 9- Neumann, 1901, p. 290, dis- covered, however, upon examination of the type, that it possessed eyes, in consequence of which he referred it to the genus Hyalomma. Consequently, the genus Haemalastor disappears, together with the single species upon which it was founded. For list of species referred to Haemalastor by various authors, see List of condemned species. Eschatocephalus Frauenfeld, 1853, p. 55. Recognized by L. Koch, 1877, p. 150; Joseph, 1882, p. 16 ; Neumann, 1899, p. 179, and 1901, p. 290 (name revived), and all subsequent authors except Donitz, 1910. For a list of species referred to Esckatocephalus by various authors, see List of condemned species. Note: Esckatocephalus was retained as a genus by Neumann (1902, p. 116) until 1904, p. 445, when he made it a subgenus oi Ixodes, because he considered that the generic characters were insufficient to maintain the generic rank, the differences "being only specific." He states that "the ^, by virtue of its claviform palps, which are circular on cross section, differs sufficiently from other Ixodes to place this species (meaning /. vespertilionis) in a subgenus." Still retained as a genus by Blanchard, 1909, p. 96. We are of the same opinion as Donitz, 1910, p. 400, that there is no valid reason for retaining the genus, and we have condemned Esckatocephalus as a subgenus. Dermanyssus Kolenati, 1857, p. 10 = Ixodes {vide List of condemned species). Sarconyssus Kolenati, 1857, p. 21 (various " species " = /x'oo?es vespertilionis. See List of condemned species). Hyalomma Pickard-Cambridge, 1878, p. 222, Hyalomma puta = Ixodes putus q.v. Ceratixodes Neumann, 1902, p. 115. The main points whereby the genus can be Key to Species 135 distinguished were originally stated to be : the convex inner surface of the palp, and the pointed extremity of the third palpal article in the ^ ; the slightly hollow internal surface and swollen ends of the palps in the $ ; anal grooves of $ as in Ixodes, but absent in the $ ; anal and adanal shields in the ^ . Neumann, 1904, p. 444, subsequently recognized that the 9 (-^• piitus q.v.) differed so slightly from other $ Ixodes, that the genus could not be retained ; the $ was found to possess an anal groove and the ^ only difters from other ^ Ixodes in respect to its palps. He therefore degraded Ceratixodes to a subgenus. Still retained as a genus by Blanchard, 1909, p. 97. Euixodes Neumann, 1904, p. 444. A subgenus founded to include all Ixodes other than Cei'atixodes and Eschatocephalus (the latter genera reduced to subgenera). Since we see no reason for retaining the latter subgenera, Euixodes falls into the synonymy of Ixodes. Generic Characters. Anal grooves embracing the anus anteriorly, and usually uniting in a pointed arch or the arc of a circle. Scutum always inornate, and without eyes. No festoons. Spiracles round or oval. Tarsi without spurs {except in Ixodes putus). The male scutum is aliuays surrounded by a prominent marghial body-fold, and the male venter presents seven non-salient chitinous plates, namely, a 2iregenital, a median, an anal, two adanal and tivo epimeral plates. The genital aperture is comparatively posterior in both sexes, and in the distended female the legs occupy a very anterior position. There is marked sexual dimorphism as regards the hypostome. Figs. 115-119. N.B. In most species the second article of the palp is narrowed at the base, leaving a space between it and the hypostome, and this gives the ticks a peculiar facies easily recognized by the naked eye. There are, however, exceptions. Type species : Ixodes ricinus (Linnaeus) Latreille, 1804. Key for the determination of species of Ixodes. Males. There are 21 species of males recorded of which one {pratti, p. 174) has not been adequately described. PAGE [Body with 5 posterior brushes of hairs . , . putus 256 I „ without such hairs . . . . .1 Legs inordinately long. ..... vespertilionis 272 ,, moderately „ . . . . .2 [Basis capituli with dorsal punctate excavation . coxaefurcatus 270 I „ „ without ,, „ .3 136 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Genus Ixodes Dorsum showing two lateral folds „ „ one „ fold (Anal grooves divergent ( „ ,, convergent jAnal grooves convergent \ „ „ parallel or divergent [Anal grooves approaching but not uniting behind ( „ „ uniting behind, . . . . [Anal plate oval, basis capituli with median point I ventrally ....... 1 Anal plate racket-shaped, basis capituli tricuspid [ ventrally ....... [Coxa IV with long internal spur . I ,, „ without long internal spur [Tarsus 4 humped some distance from end . I „ „ tapering [A single distinct spur on coxa I . (Two spurs or none ..... [Median ventral plate about as broad as long . [ „ „ „ much longer than broad Coxa I with two spurs .... „ „ without spurs ; at most slightly pointed [Both spurs very long and close together I „ „ otherwise ..... [Both spurs short, subequal .... (Inner spur long and strong, outer short. Strong cornua ; anal grooves short, divergent No cornua ; anal grooves long, parallel rTarsi humped .... \ „ tapering .... Coxae trenchant ..... „ not trenchant .... [Punctations very fine, equal ( „ unequal, nearly obsolete 4 PAGE 5 loricatus 266 holocyclus 235 6 10 pilosus schillingsi cordifer 9 rasus ugandanus 11 12 hexagonus ricinus 13 16 gigas 14 15 boliviensis minor angustus canisuga 17 tenuii'ostris 18 cavipalpus ruhicundus 221 238 233 228 230 178 147 203 166 164 195 210 246 193 204 Kcif to Species 137 Females. 1. 2. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. There are 48 species known by their females. [Legs inordinately long (on bats) . (Legs moderate ...... [Anal grooves horseshoe shaped or closed behind I „ „ sub-parallel or divergent [Anal grooves horseshoe shaped . I „ „ closed behind .... (Coxa I with two long sharp spurs ; well-marked auriculae (Madagascar) .... Coxa I otherwise ..... 'Coxa I with a long internal spine ; auriculae (on monkeys, Africa) ..... Coxa I with no internal spine ; no auriculae (on cattle, S. Africa) ..... JAnal grooves a circle (Africa) I „ „ an oval, pointed behind . Coxa I with sharp internal spur . ,, „ without internal spur Scutum broader than long, palps short, with article 1 much enlarged .... Scutum longer than broad, palps long, normal (Australia) ....... [Coxae practically unarmed .... [Some of the coxae with distinct spurs . Scutum broadest quite in front (on marine birds) „ ,, near middle or posteriorly fScutum broadest behind the middle ( ,, „ in middle or a little anteriorly fScutura broader than long .... I „ longer than broad .... (Palps with article 1 greatly enlarged on ventral aspect ....... Palps with article 1 small .... vespertilionis 274 1 2 8 3 iimatus 4 226 schillingsi 239 pilosus 222 7risus 229 6 ugandanus 232 7 australiensis 250 holocyclus 236 9 20 piitus 258 10 11 14 12 13 tasmani 244 ornithorhynchi 242 10 138 Genus Ixodes 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. {Anal grooves short, strongly divergent (Europe, on small mammals) ...... Anal grooves long, sub-parallel (Australia) . [Article 1 of palps enlarged, cup-like (Australia) . 1 „ „ „ normal [Anal grooves short, divergent .... I „ „ long, sub-parallel .... [Scutum sub-circular; slight cornua I „ elongate ; no cornua (on bats) (Sharp spurs on trochanters (Africa) (No trochantal spurs ...... /Coxae trenchant; scutum smooth, with fine punc- I tations (Africa) ...... Coxal borders rounded ; scutum rugose, with large punctations ...... {Scutum slightly rugose ; widest rather in front of middle (Europe) Scutum very rugose ; widest in middle (America) (No internal spur, but a blunt external spur on coxa I ....... . Coxa I with internal spur ..... {Spurs on trochanters (? on birds, Nightingale Island) ........ No spurs on trochanters ..... /Porose areas large, confluent, occupying most of basis capituli (on marine birds) Porose areas tranversely elongate, separate (on marine birds) ....... ^Internal coxal spur long ..... J „ „ „ short; a slight external spur I, or tooth ........ [A strong external spur ..... (External spur short or absent .... (Both spurs long, parallel, sub-equal (India) (Internal spur much the longer .... [Anal grooves short, anus very postei'ior (Mexico). \ „ „ long (Brazil) tenuirostris 247 fecialis 248 vestitiis 252 15 16 17 japonensis simplex 208 207 cavipalpus 18 194 ruhicundus 206 19 camsuga texanus 212 214 21 23 percavatus 22 220 unicavatus 264 signatus 261 24 33 25 27 acutitarsus 202 26 hicornis 186 fuscipes 169 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. Key to Species Cornua well marked, sharp . . . . . „ faint or absent . . . . . jPorose areas large, near together (N. America) . I „ „ small, far apart (America) (Hypostome very long and pointed ; anus very posterior (Italy) Hypostome normal {Punctations on scutum large and few; coxal spine very long (Sumatra) Punctations small and numerous [Anal grooves short ; auriculae strong ( „ „ long; no auriculae . {Porose areas transversely elongate (Madeira) (possibly identical with ricinus) Porose areas less elongate . J Scutum nearly as broad as long . I „ elongate, distinctly longer than broad [Anal grooves pointed in front ; tarsi humped I „ ,, rounded in front .... {Scutum oval; auriculae, but no cornua (America) „ cordiform ; cornua, but no auriculae (America) ....... (Article 1 of palp with anteriorly directed spur (oi birds, Brazil) ....... No such spur ....... (Basis capituli winged, pointed laterally (S. America) ........ Basis capituli normal ...... [Tarsus 4 humped, or narrowing abruptly I „ „ tapering more or less gently [Anal grooves rounded in front .... I „ ,, pointed „„.... [Basis capituli elongate ..... \ „ „ broader than long .... ''Slight sharp cornua, porose areas oval, longer than broad (Chili) . No cornua, porose areas much broader than long (N.Zealand) 139 PAGE 28 29 sculptus 171 diversifossus 163 acuminatus 161 30 spinicoxalis 171 31 holiviensis 167 32 nigricans 159 ricinus 1.50 34 36 hexagonus 179 3.5 dentatus 162 pratti 174 auritulus 187 37 loricatus 267 38 39 43 40 42 fossulatus 201 41 stilesi 216 neumanni 218 10—2 140 Genus Ixodes 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 'Scapulae long and sharp ; basis capitiili broadest anteriorly (Mexico) ...... Scapulae short and rounded ; basis capituli tri- angular (America) ...... (Scutum nearly twice as long as broad (1"3 x "7 mm.) with rounded sides (S. America) Scutum less elongate, with angular sides /Anal grooves not reaching posterior border ; J strong white hairs on scutum (on birds) I Anal grooves reaching posterior border ; scutal . V hairs short or absent ..... Basis capituli broader than long ; porose areas almost confluent . , . Basis capituli longer than broad ; porose areas separate ....... Sharp auriculae ; anal grooves rounded in front (on mouse, Christmas Island) .... No auriculae ; anal grooves pointed in front (America) ....... ruhidus 175 marxi 173 ■minor 165 44 hrunneus 190 45 caledonicus 198 46. nitens 185 angustus 196 Nymphs. N.B. Of the 22 nymphal forms recorded there are 19 species described sufficiently to be included in the following key. Not included are fuscipes, p. 170 ; hrunneus, p. 190 ; siniplex, p. 208. 2. 5. With legs inordinately long „ „ otherwise (Scutum without cervical grooves 1 ;, with [Scutum with lateral grooves 1 „ without lateral grooves . (Coxae unarmed .... I „ armed .... (Palp with article 1 large and pointing forward I „ „ „ „ otherwise (With anal grooves fused to a point behind . ( ;, „ ., otherwise . , vespertilionis 27.: tenuirostris 2 3 9 vestitus 4 angustus 5 holocyclus 6 248 254 197 237 Key to Species 141 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 10. 17. [With anal grooves in the form of a horseshoe I „ „ „ parallel or divergent [With long palps, concave externally . I „ palps otherwise .... [With tarsus 4 tapering 1 ,. „ ,) humped [With coxae unarmed . \ „ „ armed [With tarsus 4 humped I „ „ ,, othervi^ise [With very long scutum (With short, very broad scut {Coxae with small blunt protuberance postero externally Coxae with marked spurs postero-externally [Without auriculae .... [Otherwise ...... [Trochanters with postero-external spur ( „ without postero-external spur With anal grooves horseshoe-like „ „ „ otherwise With scutum longer than broad . ,, „ as long as broad With scutum about as broad as long „ „ narrow, elongate 17 7 holiviensis 169 8 ricinus 151 ruhidus 176 10 12 canisuga 213 11 putus 259 ornithorhynchi 242 hexagonus 181 13 unicavatus 265 14 15 neumanni 219 schillingsi 241 16 signatus 263 caledonicus 199 pilosus 224 loricatus 268 Larvae. N.B. There are 14 species whose larvae have been recorded, three of which (fuscipes, p. 170; branneus, p. 190; loricatus, p. 268) have not been adequately described nor figured. The following key, therefore, relates to but 11 species. 1. [With legs inordinately long ( „ „ otherwise .... [Scutum with cervical grooves absent . I „ » „ „ present . vespertilionis 275 1 tenuirostris 248 2 142 Genus Ixodes 2, 3. 4. 5. 6. jScutum with lateral grooves .... vestitus 255 \ „ without lateral grooves . ... 3 (Coxae unarmed ....... 4 ( „ with spurs ...... 7 [Palp with article 1 large and pointing forward . angustus 197 ] „ otherwise ....... 5 [Capitulum with dorsal ridge pointing out laterally pilosus 224 ( „ otherwise . . . . . .6 ("Basis capituli with latero- ventral protuberances . canisuga 213 ( „ „ „ ventral ridge . . . hexagonus 181 w (Basis capituli without auriculae .... unicavatus 265, 266 ( „ „ with auriculae .... 8 {Scutum with cervical grooves diverging widely behind 9 Scutum with cervical grooves otherwise . . signatus 263 Coxa IV with two spurs caledonicus 200 ,, „ without two spurs .... ricinus 152 143 SPECIFIC DESCRIPTIONS OF VALID SPECIES OP IXODES AND OF THEIR VARIETIES AND SUBSPECIES 1. IXODES RICINUS^ (Linnaeus, 1746 and 1758). Pis. IV and VII, Text-figs. 115, 139-148. Synonymy: not Reduvius Charleton, 1668, p. 49. IRicimis caninus Ray, 1710, p. 10 (Synon. in Walckenaer and Gervais, 1844, p. 236). ?. not Acarus reduvius Linnaeus, 1746, p. 479. >S>/st. naiur. 1758, 10th edit., p. 616; 1788, 13th edit., p. 2925. Acarus ricinus Linnaeus, 1746, p. 480 ; 1758, p. 615 ; 1788, p. 2925. Eegarding the synonymy of this species, Neumann (1901, pp. 281-282) writes as follows : "Linnaeus, in his Fauna suecica (1746), describes under No. 1192 an Acarus ovinus, which he makes synonymous with Reduvncs Charleton {Onomasticon zooicum, 1668) and Pediculus ovinus Rajus (Historia insectorum, 1710). In his Systema naturae (10th edit., 1758, p. 615), Linnaeus changes his Acarus ovinus to Acarus reduvius, and gives it under this new name as No. 1966 in Fauna suecica (2nd edit., 1761), retainiiig his synonymies. On referring to the text and the figures of the writers cited by Linnaeus, it is clearly evident that the writers mentioned were dealing with Melophagus ovinus and not one of the Acari. It is consequently due to an error that Linnaeus placed Reduvius or Pedicidus ovinus in his genus Acarus. Whatever may have been the form to which he desired to attach the name Acarus reduvius, this name loses all taxonomic value, and it is necessary to revive the name of Ixodes ricinus {Acarus ricinus Linnaeus), which applies to the same species of tick and does not lead to confusion." Acarus ricinoides de Geer, 1778, vii, p. 98 ; p. 101 {reduvius). Ixodes ricinus Latreille, 1804, i, p. 156 (?). Ixodes reduvius Latreille, 1804, p. 51. ^ According to Dubreuilh, 1900, p. 450, the word Ricinus, used to signify a tick by Pliny, gave its name to the castor-oil plant, as stated by Dioscorides, iv, 161, because the seeds of the latter resemble a tick {i.e. the gorged females). 144 Genus Ixodes Cynorhaestes reduvms Hermann, 1804, p. 65. Ci/norhaestes ricinus Hermann, 1804, p. 66. Ixodes megathyreus Leach, 181.5, xi, p. 398. Ixodes hipunctatus Risso, 1826, v, p. 183. Cynorhaestes hermanni Risso, 1826, v, p. 183. Cynorhaestes megathyreus (Leach) Risso, 1826. Crotonus ricinus Dumeril, 1829, liv, p. 401. Ixodes traheatus Audouin, 1832, xxv, p. 420 ( 9 )• Ixodes plumheus Duges, 1834, i (2), p. 20. not Ixodes plumheus Dugfes, 1834 c, PI. VII, Figs. 7-12 { = Rhipicephahis s^.). Ixodes reduvius Hahn, 1834, ii, p. 62. Ixodes fvscus Koch, 1835, Heft xxxvii. Ixodes lacertae Koch, 1835, Heft xxxix ; 1844, p. 234, larvae and nymphs, fide Canestrini, 1890, p. 497. Ixodes rufus Koch f I^^^^^' 1^35, Heft v, No. 11, Heft xxxvii. No. 8 ; 1844, Ixodes sidcatus Koch -;' P" ^32 ; 1847, p. 21. The types examined by Neumann Ixodes sciuri Koch | (^^^l' PP" 281-289) proved to be 7. ricinus nymphs, all V collected in Germany. Ixodes reduvius Linu., in Koch, 1835, Heft v, No. 11. Ixodes pustularum Lucas, 1866, vi ; Bidl., p. Ivii. Ixodes fodiens Murray, 1877, p. 191. As synonym in Neumann, 1899, p. 122. Neumann, 1904, p. 45, rightly states that this name is Murray's, not Megnin's, as stated by Murray, 1877, and quoted from the latter by Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 465. Ixodes ovatus Neumann, 1899, p. 116; in part, see Neumann, 1904, p. 452, where he states the lot of ovatus was subsequently found to comprise ricinus. — Donitz, 1905, p. 132. Ixodes ovatus Neumann, 1899, as modified by Neumann, 1904, p. 452 = Zro(/es ricinus var. ovatus (Neumann) Nuttall and Warburton, 1911. Ixodes reduvius (Linnaeus) in Railliet, 1895, p. 706 ; Neumann, 1899, p. 112, and many subsequent writers. In N. Tyne Valley, where they occur commonly on sheep, they are locally known as "face ticks," since they are found in this situation on sheep (Wheler, 1899). Styled the "Castor-bean tick" by Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 463, and several subsequent authors. The castor-bean is however much more like a gorged Amblyomma $. (See footnote, p. 143.) The synonymy of this species might be extended almost indefinitely. We confine ourselves, however, to the names concerning which little doubt can be entertained. Iconography: De Geer, 1778, PI. V {Ac. ricinoides), Figs. 16-19, ? dorsum, part of capitulum, tarsus ; PL VI {Ac. reduvius), Figs, 1-8, $ dorsum, spiracle (recognized as such), capitulum, tarsus, ^ and $ in copula (recognized as coitus), (^ dorsum, capitulum. Excellent, considering the date ; better than some figures printed a hundred years later. — Audouin, 1832, PI. XIV, Figs. 3rt-?i {traheatus).— Dngbs, 1834, PI. VII, Figs. 7-12 {plumheus).— Rahn, 1834, TICKS PLATE IV Fig. 1. Fig. 2. Fig. 3. Fig. 4. Fig. 5. Fig. 6. Fig. 7. Figs. 1-7. Ixodes ricinus. Fig. 1. cf dorsum, x 12. (Wheler, 1906, Fig. 16.) Fig. 2. (J venter (mounted specimen). (Original, E. G. Wheler, phot.) Fig. 3. ? dorsum, x 12. (Wheler, 1906, Fig. 17.) Fig. 4. ¥ venter, x 9. (Wheler, 1906, Fig. 11.) Fig. 5. o dorsum, x 12. (Wheler, 1906, Fig. 18.) Fig. 6. L dorsum, x 12. (Wheler, 1906, Fig. 19.) Fig. 7. ? with one ,? coupled and a second tf "waiting his turn." (Wheler, 1906, Fig. 36.) Reprinted (Fig. 2 excepted) from the original blocks illustrating the paper by E. G. Wheler, Journ. Aijric. (Cdnibridge), Vol. i. /. riclnns 145 II, PI. LXVI, Fig. 152 (c^).— Koch, 1835-44, Heft 5, Fig. 11 (reduvtus ?); Heft 37, Figs. 5-7 {ricinus S, $s), Fig. 8 (scmri) ; Heft 39, Fig. 11 (lacertae), Figs. 3, 4 (fuscus S^ 9), Fig- " {ruftcs, 9 )•— Pageiistecher, 1861, ii, PL I, Figs. 1-10 ; PI. II, Figs. 1-22. Really excellent figures of anatomy. — Megnin, 1867, i, PI. IV. — Murray, 1877, Fig. 2 (fodieiis; figure useless).— Haller, 1882, PI. V, Fig. 4 (rici)ms).—BrAun, 1883, Figs. 55, 56 (ricinus).— Railliet, 1886, p. 348 (ricinus). — Aurivillius, 1886, Figs, a and 6 of $ ; very poor. — Berlese, 1888, fasc. XLix, PI. VI {reduvius, $ dorsum, venter, capitulum and scutum, etc. ; poor) ; 1889, fasc. LV, No. 16, giving generic characters of Ixodes : (^ venter and spiracle ; 9 capitulum in ventral aspect, capitulum, scutum, spiracle ; larva, ventral aspect ; a digit. Outline figures, recognizable as ricinus. — Neumann, 1888, Fig. 47. — Canestrini, 1890, PI. XLIII, Figs. 1-1 ^r (/. reduvius) : ^ venter, hypostome ; 9 dorsum (fed and unfed), part of capitulum, digit, etc. (very poor). Figs. 3-3 & '■^ Phauli.vodes rufus (Koch)" dorsum, digit, hypostome ; scarcely recognizable. — Blanchard, 1890, Figs. 592- 595 (ricmMs).— Neumann, 1892, Figs. 53-55.— Megnin, 1892, Fig. 4 ; outline figures of egg, larva, nymph and female, with details all very inaccurate. — Mosler and Peiper, 1894, Fig. 110 (ricinus). — Neumann, in Railliet, 1895, Fig. 481 ; i-eproduced V)y Salmon and Stiles, 1901, Fig. 222, and by other authors ; (^ venter, capitulum, tarsus 4 and foot. Somewhat schematic (reduvius). — Gene, in Railliet, 1895, Fig. 480 ( $ ovipositing, original figure by Gene). — Braun, 1895, Figs. 127, 128 (ricinus). — Megnin, 1895, figs, worthless, of different stages.— Osborn, 1896, Fig. 155; poor.— NilesS 1898, PI. IV, Figs. 3-6 (ricinus). -Morgan!, 1899, Pis. VII, VIII, Figs. 1-5 (ricm«s).— Neumann, 1899, Fig. 1, ^ 9 digits (reduvius) ; Figs. 2, 3, hypostome and digit of ^ and 9 (ovatus), here reproduced. — Wheler, 1899, pp. 38, 39 (reduvius), various stages, ^, 9i o and larva, from photographs of mounted and unmounted specimens ; somewhat too freely retouched. — Lewis, 1900, figures illustrating process of copulation. — Salmon and Stiles, 1901, coloured Plate XCIII, Figs. 223, 224, 9 (gorged), much enlarged, dorsum and venter ; PI. XCIV, Figs. 225, 226, 9 capitulum in ventral aspect, capitulum and scutum, much enlai'ged (they omit lateral grooves on scutum). — Kossel, Schiitz, Weber and Miessner, 1903, Pis. I-III, 18 excellent photomicrographs of all stages, with details of structure. — Mohler, 1905, PI. I, Figs. 2, 2a, 26 (9 sketchy, coloured).— Nordeuskiold, 1905, text- figures, illustrating anatomy and histology. — Wheler, 1900, Pis. VII, VIII, reproductions of photographs of (a) mounted specimens (^ and 9 )> poor ; and (b) of unmounted ( (^ , 9 dorsum and venter, o and larva ; here reproduced) ; Pi. X, Fig. 38, shows an abnormality : a 9 minus capitulum ; Fig. 36 ( (J and 9 in copula) ; other figures illustrate gorged 9 > ^^^^ ? ovipositing. — Donitz, 1907, PI. VI, Figs. 34-36, 38, ^ and 9 capitula, ^ venter ; good.— Banks, '1908, PI. II, Figs. 9, 10, 13 ; PI. IX, Fig. 5, brief description of 9 only; figures relate to 9 '^^d ^^'^ poor.— Bonnet, 1908, p. 254, Figs. 15, 16; poor. — Nordeuskiold, 1908, Pis. XXVI-XXVIII, Text-figs, a and 6; histology, im- portant.— Nuttall, 1908, Figs 5-7, o, larva, ^, reproduced here. — Blanchard, 1909, p. 91, Figs. 102-105 (after Neumann and Bonnet).— Samson, 1909 a, Pis. IX-XII, 18 text-figs, (anatomy, histology and biology); 1909b, PI. IX, 1 Inacces.sible, cited by Salmon and Stiles, 1901. 146 Genus Ixodes 7 text-figs, (spermatogenesis). — Braun and Liihe, 1910, Figs. 89, 90. Original, ^ venter and 5 capitulum in ventral aspect. Good representations after drawings by A. Dampf. Literature : 1710. Ray, p. 10 {Ricinus caninus). — 1746. Linnaeus, p. 480 {Acarus ricmus).— 1758. Linnaeus, p. 615 {Acarus ricinus, not Ac. reduvius; latter confused with Melophagus ovinus). — 1778. de Geer, pp. 98, 101 {Acams ricinoides, Ac. reduvius ; mechanism of bite described, coitus, etc.). — 1804. Hermann, pp. 65, 67 {Cynorhoestes reduvius and C. ricinus). Latreille, p. 51 (/. reduvius) ; p. 156 (/. ricinus)^. — 1805. Fabricius, p. .351 (/. ricinus). — 1807. Chabrier, p. .366 ; Illiger % p. .370.-1815. Leach, p. .398 (/. megathyreus on hedgehogs and dogs); p. 397 (/. ricinus on dogs). — 1817. Miiller^, p. 278 (7. ricinus). — 1826. von Heyden, p. 610 ; Risso, p. 18.3 (/. hipunctatus, Cyn. hermanni, Cyn. megathyreus (Leach)). — 1829. Dumeril, p. 401 (Crotonus ricinus) ; von Heyden, p. 288. — 1831. Treviranus, p. 191. — 1832. Audouin, p. 420 (/. traheatus). — 1834. Hahn, p. 62, 0^; Dugfes, p. 20 (/. plumbeus). — 1835-44. Koch, Heft 37, No. 5 (S); H. 5, No. 11 ; H. 37, No. 8 (/. sciuri); No. 3 (7. fuscus on deer) ; No. 7 (/. rufus, 9 , on deer) ; No. 1 1 (/. lacertae, o on Lacerta agilis, Munich). — 1837. Burmeister, p. 579 (/. marginatiis). — 1844. Walckenaer and Gervais, p. 236 ; Gene, pp. 1 et seq., a very valuable contribution to the biology and structure of ricinus ; the first author to describe oviposition in ticks. — 1847. Koch, p. 21 . (/. sciuri and /. fuscus) ; p. 20 (/. ricimis) ; p. 22 (/. lacertae). — 1850. von Siebold, p. 546, passages quoted by Leydig, 1855, p. 468 and Heller, 1858, p. 311 re spermatozoa. Also cited by Samson, 1909, p. 216. — 1855. Klichenmeister, p. 422 (mere cited description of $ /. ricinus).— ISbl . Kolenati, p. 24.— 1858. Milner^, pp. 6, 13.-1859. Gervais and van Beneden, p. 411. — 1861. Moquin-Tandon, p. 302. Pagen- stecher, pp. 1-38, important regarding structure and biology ; figs, often reproduced since, thus : Claus, 1887, p. 470, anatomy of body, and Braun, 1906, p. 364, etc.— 1863. Gerstaecker 2, p. 344.-1864. Cox, p. 82 (on dogs and ferrets, but may have been hexagonus). — 1866. Lucas, p. Ivii (/. 'pustidarum).—l8&J. Megnin, p. 107.-1869. Packard^, p. 613.-1870. Verrill2, p. 118.-1876. Wagner, p. 129, 0.-1877. Murray, p. 191 (/. fodiens) ; Canestrini and Fanzago, pp. 110, 180 ; Conil, p. 26. — 1877. Murray, pp. 190, 193 (/. fodiens, vide synonymy); quotes Lucas, 1866, and Megnin, 1867. — 1878. ConiP, p. 100.— 1879. Cobbold, pp. 267, 350.-1880. Haller, p. 38 ; Megnin, p. 127 ; Oudemans, p. xvii ; Taschenberg, p. 151, 0. — 1881. Bertkau, p. 145 (copulation and oviposition) ; Haller, (a), p. 165. — 1882. Haller, p. 309. ■ — 1883. Braun, pp. 211 et seq.; van Beneden, p. 142, 1 ricinus, penetrating beneath the skin in man ; thinks ticks do so normally ! — 1885. Johannessen, p. 401 (ettects of bite on man).- — 1886. Railliet, p. 497. Aurivillius, {a), p. 105, 3 figures of ? (poor); (6), p. 139, same paper as preceding ; tick beneath the .skin of a fox. Ludwig, p. 612. — 1888. Neumann, p. 90 ; Berlese, fasc. xlix, n. 6; Winkler, p. 113 (anatomy). — 1889. Berlese, figures. — 1890. Canestrini, pp. 474 et seq. ; Blanchard, pp. 324 et seq. — 1891. Blanchard, p. 689 (penetration 1 Most authors after this date refer to the species as either ricinus or reduvius. - Cited in bibliography by Salmon and Stiles, 1901, unimportant. 3 The sign 0 denotes that the publication referred to contains nothing worth noting. /. ricinus 147 beneath human skin, excision of a $ ricinus) ; BatelH, pp. 78 et seq. (physiology of digestion). — 1892. Neumann, p. 95 ; Megnin, p. 32 ; Efi.sio', p. 256 ; Janson and Tokisliige', p. 349.-1894, iNIosler and Peiper, p. 320 ; Dolly i, p. 1000.— 1895. Braun, p. 257 ; Neumami, in Railliet, p. 707 (figs.) ; Railliet, p. 706 ; Megnin, p. 364 ; poor description and worse figures. — 1896. Osborn, p. 262, brief mention; Oudemans, p. 191; Schneidemiihl, p. 339; Dubreuilh and Beille, p. G9, O.— 1897. Wood and Fitzi, p. 346.— 1898. Nilesi, pp. 29, 45 ; Weich.selbaum, \). 325. — 1899. Morgan, p. 129, 0 ; Neumann, p. 116 (/. ovatas in part), p. 112 (/. reduvius) ; Wheler, pp. 38, 49 (biology and structiu-e) ; MossoS p. 20; Nuttall, 1899, p. 42, cites Dubreuilh, 1838, Despri;s, 1867, and others re effects of bite. — 1900. Kossel and Weber, relation to redwater in Finland. Ward, (a), p. 203 ; (6), p. 436. Lewis, p. 383 (copulation observed and figured'. — 1901. Salmon and Stiles, p. 262 (translation of Neumann) ; Neumann, p. 281 ; Lewis, p. 154 (mouth-parts) ; Perroncito, p. 562 (effects of bite). — 1902. Kossel, pp. 853 et seq., relation to redwater in Finland and Germany ; Wheler, pjj. 1-20, biology and structure. — 1903. Kossel, Schiitz, Weber and Miessner, pp. 39-50, relation to redwater, structure and biology. — 1904. Megnin, p. 569. — 1905. Nordenskiold, p. 485, figs, (excellent work upon the histology) ; Louping 111 and Braxy Committee's Report, pp. 21 et seq., 0. Mohler, 1905, p. 14, 0.— 1906. Wheler, p. 411 ; Vassal, p. 285, also Martin, p. 105 (experiments with trypanosome infection : negative) ; Braun, p. 364. — 1907. Donitz, p. 90 ; Pocock, p. 201 (cites Wheler, 1902).— 1908. Nuttall (figures illustrating a lecture, reproduced here) ; Banks, p. 24, 0 ; Bonnet, p. 254, 0; Galli- Valerio, p. 611, biology; Nordenskiold, p. 637, histology, important ; Stockman (reprint, relation to redwater). — 1909. Samson, (a), pp. 185-236 ; (6), pp. 486-499 (see under Iconography, Nordenskiold, (a), p. 511 (spermatogenesis) ; (6), p. 30 (development) ; (c), p. 449 (anatomy and histology, important)). Blanchard, p. 91. Ashworth, p. 133. — 1910. Braun and Liihe, p. 178, 0 ; Samson, pp. 1 et seq., dissertation, anatomy and biology. Male (PI. IV, Text-figs. 115, 139-142) : average L. 245, W. 1-33 mm.^ Body dark red-brown, narrow in front, broadly rounded behind, very ' Cited in bibliography by Salmon and Stiles, 1901, unimportant. 2 Note regarding measurements : The size of different specimens may vary, thus 6 d' s, comprised in two lots collected iu England (N. 933, 934), measured in mm.— Scutum Length, including Body ^ ' n capltulum width length width f 2-6 V- 1-3 1-85 1-1 Lot 933 2-5 1-4 20 1-2 (2-3 1-35 1-75 1-1 ('2-5 1-4 1-9 1-1 Lot 934 \ 2-4 1-3 1-8 I'O ( 2-2 1-2 1-6 0-95 Wheler (xii. 1899), who has made numerous measurements, states that the length varies from 2-35 to 2*8 mm. Neumann (1899, p. 113) gives the size at 2-5 x 1-5 mm. The size of the unfed ? is given at 2-85 x 3*25 mm., and that of the gorged s at 148 Genus Ixodes convex when gorged. Marginal fold slight, generally of lighter colour than the scutum. Scutum (average 1'8 x 1"1 mm.) glossy with very numerous fine punctations ; cervical grooves very superficial ; lateral grooves absent, or their commencement faintly indicated. Numerous fairly long scattered white hairs. Emargi nation moderate, scapulae blunt. Venter: genital orifice large, between coxae III; pregenital plate nearly twice as long as broad ; median plate fairly broad with rounded sides, aual plate with lateral borders divergent, adanal plates narrowing posteriorly. Spiracles large, oval, with long axis directed Fig. 139. I. ricinm ) i and ? digits, respectively, 138 /x and 140 /xZ., viewed from the dorsal surface. (Nuttall and Warburton, 1908, Figs. 4 and 5.) ' Accentuated in Fig. 184. 194 Genus Ixodes Female (Figs. 185, 186), more or less fed : L. 2-9 to 5, W. 1-8 to 3'3 mm. Body brown, with a few scattered hairs. Scutum {I. 1'3 to 1"4, w. 1 to 1*2 mm.) dark brown, long oval with slightly sinuous posterior border ; cervical grooves shallow, almost reaching the margin ; no lateral grooves ; numerous fine shallow punctations. Vente?- brown, with scattered hairs, long at the sides ; vulva between coxae IV ; anal grooves nearly reaching the posterior border and slightly divergent ; spiracles round, whitish. Capitulum (Fig, 186) fairly long (09 mm.), base tri- angular, with piriform porose areas far apart ; palps with article 2 concave externally (whence " cavipalpus ") owing to lateral prominence proximally ; hypostome long and narrow with a crown of small teeth followed by dentition 2 j 2. (Digit; see Fig. 185 B.) Legs as in ^f, but coxae I-II close together, III distant from II, and IV more distant from III ; coxa I pointed, II-IV with straight posterior borders. Fig. 186. /. cavipalpus ? : capitulum in (A) dorsal and (B) ventral aspects. (Nuttall and Warburton, 1908, Fig. 3.) Description based on (N, 245) 2 ^/'s and 7 $s from a baboon (Cyno- cephalus habuin), Kansanshi, N.W. Rhodesia, 1. 1907 (Dr A. Yale Massey) ; (N. 353) 1 (/" from a native haby, Benguella Hinterland, Angola, xii. 1907 (Dr F. Creighton Wellman) ; and (N. 394) ^b, % s from the last- named source, 1908. This species strongly resembles /. pilosus (p. 221), but may be readily distinguished from it by the anal grooves and the absence of a lateral groove on the $ scutum. /. cuujiistns 195 20. IXODES ANGUSTUS Neumann, 1899. Figs. 187-190 (original). Lit. etc. : Ixodes angustus Neumann, 1899, p. 136 (no figure). not Ixodes angustus Neumann, 1901, p. 284, Fig. 4 (digit of 9 ). In this pai)er Neumann re-described what he took to be angustus from 2 $ s found on Didelphys azarai, Buenos Ayres (C. Berg coll.). Banks (1908, v. infra) has pointed out tliat this second description relates to an entirely different form which Neumann (1910, p. 30) has since recognized as /. loricatus. In con- sequence of this mistake Neumann (1910) suppresses the species angustzis, but this does not appear to us to be permissible, for the type specimen first described (1899) still exists, and is a perfectly distinct species. Ixodes angustus Neumann, in Banks, 1904, p. 331 ; 1908, p. 29, PI. IV, Fig. 2 ( $ capitulum, scutum, coxae and spiracle ; sketchy, but not very inaccurate). Male^ (Fig. 187) : oval, rather narrower in front, broadest in the middle. Scutum (1"4 x '9 mm.) convex, marginal fold moderate; numerous fine, shallow punctations and short white hairs; a rather well-defined pseudo-scutum ; cervical grooves shallow, divergent ; lateral grooves indicated by slight marginal ridges on the pseudo-scutum. Venter : genital orifice opposite the second intercoxal space ; pregenital plate of irregular form, short; median plate sub-trapezoid, longer than broad, narrower in front ; anal plate with sides very slightly diverging ; adanal plates rhomboidal. Spiracle sub-circular, its ventral borde'- somewhat pointed. Capitulum: base trapezoid, broader in Fig. 187. I. angustus s : dorsum, venter, spiracle and tarsus 4. From specimen (N. 1065) found on squirrel, Mt Lehman, British Columbia, S. Hadwen coll. (Original, G. H.F.N, del.) ^ Banks, 1908, p. 30, appears to have seen the male ; his description covers five lines and is quite inadequate. The o and larva have not been hitherto figured or described. 196 Genus Ixodes front, punctate ; palps short, with very convex inner contour and slightly convex outer contour ; article 2 broader anteriorly than long, article 3 about equal in length to article 2, article 1 somewhat sharply prominent ventrally ; hypostome small, armed only on its anterior third with 3 I 3 rather obscure sub-equal teeth, about 4 per file. Legs : coxae all bidentate, the inner spur of coxa I fairly long and strong; small internal and external spurs on coxae II-IV, internal spur on IV almost obsolete. Tarsi moderate, tai-sus 4 tapering obliquely ; pad long. Female (Fig. 188) : Body elongate, with numerous fine punctations and short white hairs. Scutum (15 x I'l mm. Nn.) much longer than broad, broadest at the anterior third, where there are distinct lateral angles ; cervical grooves shallow, long, diverging gradually ; lateral grooves indicated by straight ridges reaching the border near the posterior end of the scutum ; numerous small punctations, most evident posteriorly ; scapular angles very sharp and prominent ; a few scattered hairs. Vente7': vulva between coxae III ; anal groove rather ogival in front, with sides nearly parallel ; spiracle transversely oval. Capitulum : base triangular dorsally, slightly longer than broad, the posterior border straight, cornua absent. Porose areas large, of rather indefinite contour, the interval less than their length. Palps long, article 2 half as long again as article 3, article 3 rather pointed in front. Hypostome long, sharply pointed, 2 | 2 then 3 | 3 sharp teeth. Legs as in the . IS7 = Boophilus anmdatiis (Say) Curtice, 1891. californicus Banks, 1904, p. 369, PI. XLI, Fig. 57 ; 1908, p. 24, PI. II, Fig. 12 = I. ricinus var. californicus (Banks) Nuttall and Warburton, 1911. camelinus Fischer von Waldheim, 1823, p. 13, PL, Figs. 1 and i = Hyalomma aegyptium (Linn.). cenereohcs Lucas, 1840, pp. 47, 48, PL VII, Fig. 10 (after Gervais, 1844, p. 244). Insufficiently described ; see Neumann, 1899, p. 165; from Canary Islands. ckelifer Megnin, 1880, p. \Z% = Haemaphysalis concinna Koch, 1844. chordeilis Packard, 1867, p. 61 — Haemaphysalis leporis palustris (Packard), /o?e Neumann, 1897, p. 343, but stated to be a distinct species of Haemaphysalis by Banks, 1908, p. 34. ductus Fabricius, 1805, p. 356 ; undeterminable. cinctus Lucas, 1840, pp. 47, 48, PL VII, Fig. 12 (after Gervais, 1844, p. 243). Insufficiently described ; from Canary Islands. columbae Fabricius, 1805, p. ZbQ^Argas reflects, "communis" Marx (label: no date) = /. ricinus var. scapularis (Say) Nuttall and Warburton, 1911. cookei Packard, 1869 a, p. 61 = hexagonus var. cookei (Packard) Nuttall and Warburton, 1911 ; not Haemaphysalis concinna Koch, as stated in Neu- mann, 1897, p. 338. cormiger Kolenati, 1857, p. 431, PL VI, Fig. 52 (very poor) = Hyalomma aegyptium (Linn.) (i^) found on camel, dog, sheep, on the steppes of Kisil-Kum, Sea of Aral. coxalis Gervais, 1842, p. 47 ; Walckenaer and Gervais, 1844, p. 249. Judging from original description may be a Dermacentor ^ ; from New Holland. crenattts Say, 1821, p. 76; 1859, p. 20. Original description useless. crenulatus Koch, 1835-1844, H. 39, Figs. 8, 9 ; 1844, p. 232 (listed) ; 1847, p. 22 = 7. hexagonus Leach, 1815, from Germany. "7. crenulatus Koch," as described by Cane-strini and Fanzago, 1877, p. 116, is undeterminable. 19—2 284 Genus Ixodes crnciarius Fitch, 1872, p. 366 ( = /. cookei fide Banks, 1908, p. 53) = /. kexa- gonus var. cookei Nuttall and Warburton, 1911. decorosus L. Koch, 1867, p. iAl—Aponomma decorosum (L. Koch) Neumann, 1899, p. 194. distipes Murray, 1877, p. 194. Purely nominal species ; see Neumann, 1899, p. 161. From Tunis. dugesii Gervais, 1844, p. 242 (Walckenaer and Gervais), /. plurnbeus Dugfes renamed = ? Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille), as suggested in Neumann, 1897, p. 385, but undeterminable from description. On dogs in France. dugesii Gervais, in Mdgnin, 1880, p. 126, Fig. 44 = Boophilus sp. elegans Guerin, 1829-1843, p. 16, PI. VI, Fig. \ = Amblyomnia variegatum, (Fabricius), 1794 ; in Neumann, 1899, p. 268. elegans Neumann, 1910, p. 191, Fig. 1=7. stilesi Neumann, 1911 (original name preoccupied ; species renamed.) elephantinus (Linn.) Fabricius, 1805, p. 351 {Ac. elephantinus Linn.) = ? Amhlyomma elephantinus (Linn.). erinacei Audouin, 1832, p. 415, PI. XIV, Fig. 32 ( $ ) = /. hexagonus Leach, 1815, in Neumann, 1899, p. 129. erinaceus Murray, 1877, p. \QQ = hexagonus Leach, 1815. erraticus Say, 1821, p. 77 ; 1859, p. 20. Original description useless ; found in S. United States. eudyptidis Maskell, 1885. See Notes on Doubtful Species, p. 291, and /. putus. eudyptidis Maskell, 1885, in Neumann, 1899, p. 128 = /. neumanni Nuttall and Warburton, 1911. eudyptidis var. signata Neumann, 1904, p. 451 = /. signatus Birula, 1895. exilipes Lucas, 1846, p. 63, PI. I, Fig. 5. Undeterminable ; on Lacerta ocellata, from Algiers. fabricii Audouin, 1827, p. 428 (description of plates) = /Tyafomma aegyptium (Linn.). fimhriatus Kramer and Neuman, 1883, p. 518 = Ixodes putus (Pickard- Cambridge, 1878). fiavidus Koch, 1844, p. 233 ; 1847, pp. 22, 103, PI. XXI, Fig. 77 ( ? ); Neumann, 1899, p. 227, states that it is a o from Rio de J emeiro = Amblyomma dissimile Koch. flavipes Koch, 1835-1844, H. 39, Fig. 2 ; 1847, p. 21 {G&YmAny)= I. vesper til ionis Koch, 1844. flavomaculatus Lucas, 1846, p. 56, PI. I, Fig. 1 ( ,^ ); 1851, p. 120 ; 1867, p. lxxii = Aponomma exornatum (Koch) 1844, in Neumann, 1899, p. 186. fodiens Murray (not Megnin), 1877, p. 191 = i-icitius (Linn.) Latreille, 1806. forskali Audouin, 1827, p. 430. An undeterminable Argas ; see our Part I, p. 6. fuscolineatus Lucas, 1847, p.c. Description useless ; from India. fuscomaculatus Lucas, 1873, p. xxi. Probably an Amhlyomma. See Neumann, 1899, p. 160 ; from S. America. fuscous {fuscus) Say, 1821, p. 79 ; 1859, p. 22. Original description useless. fuscus Koch, 1835-1844, H. 39, Figs. 3, 4 ; 1844, p. 232 (listed); 1847, p. 21 = ricinus (Linn.), in Neumann, 1899, p. 112, I Condemned Sijecies, etc. 285 gervaisi Lucas, 1847, p. j.c\\ = Aponomma gervaisi {ljVLca,ii), in Neumann, 1899, p. 182. globulosus Supino, 1897, p. 18, PI. Ill, Figs. 11-15 ; 1897, p. 249, PI. XII, Fig. 7, (tarsus). Description insufficient ; from Burma. glohuhis Lucas, 1860, p. 538. Insufficiently described, may be an Aponomma. gracileiitus Lucas, 1845, p. 58, PI. I, Fig. 2 {6) = Hyalomma aegyptium (Linn.), in Neumann, 1899, p. 286. granulatus Supino, 1897. See Notes on Doubtful Species, p. 291. herrerae Dug5s, 1887? p. 487; 1891, PI. VIII, Fig. 5 {^) = Amhlyomma cajennense Koch, 1844. hexagonus Leach, in Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 467. See synonymy of /. hexagonus var. cookei. hexagonus var. inckoatus Neumann, 1901, p. 28S = canisuga Johnston, 1849, p. 371. hexagonus var. longispinosus Neumann, 1901, p. 283 = /. hexagonus var. cookei (Packard) Nuttall and Warburton, 1911. hippopotamensis Denny, 1843, p. 313, PI. XVII, Fig. 2 { ^ ) = Amblyomma hippopotamensis (Denny), in Neumann, 1899, p. 256. hirsutus Birula, 1895, p. 356, PI. I, Figs. 7-9; Neumann, 1899, p. 162. Description and figures insufficient. From Aleutian Islands and E. Siberia. Given as synonym of /. putus by Banks, 1908, p. 54. hispanus (Fabricius) Fabr., 1805, p. 353 {Acarus hispanus Fabricius, 1794, p. 426) = probably Hyalomma aegyptium (Linn.). hispanus Kolenati, 1857, p. 431, PL VI, Fig. 52 {'^)'i— Hyalomma aegyptium (Linn.), in Neumann, 1899, p. 286. histrio (Fabricius) Fabr., 1805, p. 352 {Acarus histrio Fabricius, 1794, Suppl., p. 571). Undeterminable. holsatus (Fabricius) Fabr. 1805, p. 355 {Acarus holsatus Fabr.); 1794, p. 428. Undeterminable, probably young of ricinus or hexagonus ; see Neumann, 1899, p. 157. holsatus Fabricius, in Kolenati, 1857, p. 24, PI. 11 = Dermacentor retieulatus (Fabricius, 1794) in Neumann, 1897, p. 360. We agree in referring it to this species after consulting the original description. huma7ius Koch, 1844, p. 233 ; 1847, p. 104, PI. XXI, Fig. 78 ( ^) = Amblyomma dissimile Koch ; see Neumann, 1899, p. 227 ; a o, from Brazil. hydrosauri Denny, 1843, p. 314, PI. XVII, Fig. 4 = Amblyomma hydrosauri (Denny), in Neumann, 1899, p. 197. iguanae (Fabr.) Fabricius, 1805, p. 354 {Acarus iguanae Fabr., 1794, iv, p. 427) = Amblyovima igtianae. imperfectus Neumann, 1899, p. 118. See Notes on Doubtful Species, p. 292. indentatus Gamgee, \SQ^ = Boophilus anmdatus (Say), in Neumann, 1897, p. 408. indus (Linn.), Syst. nat., ii, 1022 ; Fabricius, 1794, p. 428 (/. indus) ; 1805, p. 355. Undeterminable. inermis Neumann, 1901, p. 283. See Notes on Doubtful Species, p. 292. intermedius Neumann, 1899, p. 132 ; 1904, p. 451=/. neumanni Nuttall and Warburton, 1911. 286 Genus Ixodes . j%ivenis Neumann, 1899, p. 124. See Notes on Doubtful Species, p. 292. kelloggi Nuttall and Warburton, 1907, p. 396 = /. hrunneus Koch, 1844. , . lacertae Koch, 1835-1844, H. 39, Fig. 11 ; 1847, p. 22 (Germany) =rimiMS (Linn.), in Neumann, 1899, p. 112. "Zr. lacertae" in Pagenstecher, 1861. p. 41, Fig. 22 ; may be the same. laevis Neumann, 1899, p. I'i?) = acutitarsus (Karsch), 1880. lagotis (rervais, 1849, y>. 49. Insufficiently described ; may be a Haemaphysalis. Zeac/n'i Audouin, 1827, p. 428. (Savigny, PI. IX, Fig. 9) = Iluemaphysalis leachi (Audouin). leporis-palustris Packard, 1867, p. Ql = Haemaphysalisleporis-palustris (Packard). Imeatus (Fabricius) Fabr., 1805, p. 354. (Acarus lineatus Fabricius, 1794, p. 428.) Undeterminable. linnei Audouin, 1827, p. 428 ; Savigny, 1825, PI. IX, Fig. 12 ; Walckenaer and Gervais, PI. XXXIII, Fig. 1 = Rhipicephahis s.^.1 Undeterminable. Upsiensis (Fabricius) Fabr., 1805, p. 354. {Acarus lipsiensis Fabricius, 1794, pp. 427, 428) = young of ricimis or hexagonus ; see Neumann, 1899, p. 157. lividus Leach, 1824, ii, in Koch, 1844, p. 234 (undeterminable) = young of ricinus or hexagonus in Neumann, 1899, p. 157. lividus van Beneden, 1873, XL. A purely nominal species from Vesperugo. No description ; see Neumann, 1899, p. 160. longipes Lucas, 1879, p. I's.xiv = vespertib'onis Koch, 1844, p. 232 ; in Neumann, 1899, p. 169. luteus Koch, 1844, p. 232 ; 1847, p. 102, PI. XX, Fig. 75 ( ? ). Species based by Koch on one o from S. Africa. Neumann, 1899, p. 146, and 1901, p. 285, referred a $ to this species, the tick having been taken from a wild dog in Africa (Paris Museum). Insufficiently described. marginalis Hahn, 1834, p. 63, PI. LXVI, Fig. 153. Useless description, undeterminable. marginalis in Gervais, 1844, p. 242 = ? (Salmon and Stiles, 1901. Synonymy of /. ricinus). marginalis Koch, 1835-1844, ii, p. 63, PI. LXVI, Fig. 53 (after Gervais). Insufficiently described ; see Neumann, 1899, p. 165. marginatus (Fabricius) Fabr. 1805, p. 354 {Acarus marginatus Fabricius, 1794, p. 427) = ^r^as reflexus (Fabr.) Latreille, 1796. mai-ginatus Burmeister, 1837, p. 579 = /. ricinus, fide Oudemans, 1896, p. 191 in Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 466. marmoratus Eisso, 1826, p. \S'^ = Dermacentor reticulatus (Fabricius) 1794, in Neumann, 1897, p. 360. maskellii Kirk, 1887, p. 66. Undeterminable, description useless. Found on Albatross {Diomedia exidans), New Zealand. megathyreus Leach, 1815, p. 398 = /. 7-icinus (Linn.). mixtus Moniez, 1896, p. A91 = Amhlyomma mixtum Koch = Amblyomma caj'en- nense (Fabr.), in Neumann, 1901, p. 348 (Index). moreliae L. Koch, 1867, p. 241 = Amblyomina moreliae (L. Koch), according to Neumann, 1899, p. 258. Description insufficient to make it a good species, however, in our opinion. Found at Bi'isbane on Morelia argus var. fasciolatu Jan. Condemned Species, etc. 287 naponensis Packard, 1867, p. Qb = Denncicentor electus Koch in Neumann, 1897, p. 366 ; but electus = D. variabilis (Say, 1821) /t/e Stiles, 1910, p. 29. nigrolineatus Packard, 1867, \>\). 66, Ql = Dennaecntor nigrolineahis (Packard) Banks, 1907, /?o?e Stiles, 1910, p. 51. Insufficiently described by Packard, who appeared to describe a (^ as a $ ; doubtfully referred to Haemaphy- salis concinna Koch by Neumann, 1897, p. 338. nigua (de Geer) Latreille, 1804, p. 52 = Ainblyomma aniericantim (Liini.) Koch, 1844 ijide Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 475. nigua Guivin = AvMyomma americanum (Linn.) Koch, 1844, in Ne'imann, 1901, p. 342 (Index). ohliquus Koch, 1844, p. 232 ; 1847, p. 99, PI. XX, Fig. 73 (? and its scutum). Insufficiently described. obseuriis Fabricius, 1805, p. 355. Undeterminable. obscurus Neumann, 1899, p. 121 = nigricans Neumann, 1908, p. 75. (Renamed, name preoccupied.) ophiophilus Miiller, 1831, p. 233, PI. LXVII = ? Aponomma gervaisi (Lucas), 1847, in Neumann, 1899, p. 182. orbiculatus Say, 1821, p. 76 ; 1859, p. 20. Original description useless. Found on Sciurus capistratus, S. United States. ^'' oregonensis" (label), in U. S. National Museum = Dermacentor salmoni Stiles, 1910, pp. 55, 60. ovatus Neumann, 1899, p. 116, Figs. 2, 3 = in partrjcm? 8. )) Experiment II. 18. X. 1905. 23. )) 24. n 18. I. 1906. Experiment I. 10. x. 1905. Many larvae were placed on a hedgehog in a tick-proof cage. 68 larvae dropj^ed off' gorged. 365 „ f'O )) » )) „ Nymphs began to emerge from the larval skins. Thirty of these nyrophs were placed on a hedgehog. 1 0 nymphs dropped off gorged. Many larvae were placed on a hedgehog. 250 larvae dropped oft' gorged. Nymphs began to emerge. 1. VIII. 1906. 50 nymphs were placed on a hedgehog. 5. „ 20 „ dropped off gorged. It follows that the larvae remain attached to the host for 3-6 days, and the nj'mphs for 4-5 days, when raised on hedgehogs in the laboratory at a temperature of about l.^*^ C. These results are in agreement with the statement by Knssel, Schiitz, Weber and Miessner (1903, p. 40), that larvae remain 3-6 days and nymphs remain 3—5 days upon the host before they become replete. These authors raised the ticks on cattle and guinea-pigs, Samson (1909, p. 186) reports that larvae and nymphs remain attached for four days to man, and as long as 10-14 days to lizards. Adults. Bertkau (1881, p. 14-5) reports that he once placed a hungry (/• and $ upon his arm, with the result that the (/* remained attached for oidy eight hours whilst the $ lemained upon him for eight days. Kossel and his colleagues once saw hungry /s readily attack a guinea-pig upon which they were placed ; they state that the $ remains attached for a week. According to Samson (1909, p. 216), the $ remains upon the host for 8-14 days. The fact that the ^ remains attached to the host but for brief periods explains why it has not as yet been observed to attack the host under other than experimental conditions. Site of attachment on the host. Kossel and his colleagues (1903, p. 39) state that all stages of the tick may be observed on cattle. The larvae and nymphs attack the beast about the head on the muzzle, eyelids and ears, and likewise on the udder. When placed experimentally upon cattle they attack any part of the host's body. Adult ticks attach themselves chiefly on the flanks, inside the legs, on the neck, udder, and in the pit about the anus and vulva. Males are frequently found running about upon the skin, but they have not been found sucking blood from cattle. They are frec^uently found 171 coitu with attached 20—2 300 Genus Ixodes females. I have found these ticks attached in similar situations on deer and roe-deer. On dogs they occur frequently about the head and neck. They attach themselves to guinea-pigs and rabbits inside and outside the ears and upon the eyelids and in other situations. Incidentally, I may mention that I have for several years utilized hedgehogs for raising experiments with very good results, since the bristles protect the ticks against injury from the host. The time required for Metamorphosis. Hatching of the eggs. A variable period of time elapses between oviposition and the hatching out of the eggs. According to Chabrier (1807, p. 366), the larvae issue from the egg after 2-3 weeks, but more recent observers record a longer period : Larvae emerge after : about 6 weeks (Kossel, Schiitz, Weber and Miessner, 1903, p. 40). „ 7 „ from 17. vi. to 4. viii. (Bertkau, 1881, p. 148). „ 8 „ „ 25. v. to 19. VII. at 65° F. (Wheler, xii. 1899). „ 22 „ „ 4. V. to 12. X. (Meek and Smith, cited by Wheler). „ 36 „ „ IX. to VI. (Ashworth, 1909, p. 133). As first noted by Gene (1844), the hexapod larva, when it issues from the egg, is almost transparent. It subsequently grows darker as the chitin hardens. Having exhausted its reserve food-supply, derived from the yolk of the egg, it attacks a host and sucks blood, abandoning the host when replete. Gorged larvae metamorphose into nymphs after a period which may be considerably prolonged by low temperature. Nymphs emerge after : (in summer) 1 month (Kossel, Schiitz, Weber and Miessner, 1903, p. 40). (in winter) 5 months ( „ „ „ „ „ „ „ ). ( „ ) 3 „ (in a room ; Nuttall, 1905, v. supra). As in the case of the larvae, the nymphs darken and harden for some days after they emerge from the larval skin. They in turn attack a host and abandon it when replete. Gorged nymphs metamorphose into adults after a period which like- wise varies according to temperature : Adults emerge after : (in summer) 2 months (Kossel, Schiitz, Weber and Miessner, 1903, pp. 40, 43). ( „ ) 2| „ : 29. V. to 19. vii. (Wheler, xii. 1899). (in winter) 7 „ (Kossel, Schiitz, Weber and Miessner, 1903, p. 43). (kept cool) 12 „ : 14. viil. 1899 to 4. viii, 1900 (Wheler, 1902), I Biology of 1. ricinus 301 Adults take about 10 days to harden and darken, remaining very quiet until this is accomplished and they are ready to attack a host (Wheler, XII. 1899). According to Kossel and his colleagues (1903, p. 40) the males emerge prior to the females. Longevity. The duration of life of ticks, removed from the host, varies gi'eatly according to the conditions under which they are kept. They are soon killed by desiccation: thus Wheler, (xii. 1899) found all stages did not survive over two to three days when placed in a dry empty bottle They resist cold: Wheler (1899, p. 7) found that females survived after exposure to "several degrees of frost"; and Kossel and his colleagues (1903, p. 43) convinced themselves that all stages survived exposure to the rigours of a German winter. The fact that the different stages hibernate accounts for the occasional occurrence of piroplasmosis amongst stall-fed cattle in winter, for bedding containing pathogenic ticks may at times be brought into cattle-sheds from tick-infested places. All stages may survive unfed for a considerable length of time in bottles containing dampened moss, filter paper, sand, or earth, as shown by the following records. Larvae (unfed) hatched 4. viii. 1898 were alive and active on 7. vi. 1899 : 101 months (Wheler 1899, p. 50). survived 19 months (Wheler, 1902). ,, for months (Kossel, Schiitz, Weber and Miessner, 1903, p. 40). Nymphs (unfed) survived 5 to 7 months (Nuttall, 1905, v. supra). „ „ „ 18 „ (Wheler, 1902). Adults (unfed) survived 15 to 27 months, having been derived from nymphs which took 12 months to undergo metamorphosis into adults (Wheler, 1902). partially-fed females, taken from a dog, survived one to three months, and two males placed in a vessel with chei-ries, died in 50 days (Galli-Valerio, 1908, p. 611). The time required to complete the Life-cycle. Wheler (xii. 1899) says that this species will, in fine, warm seasons, probably pass through at least two stages of its life in one year, but that in cold weather and when there is delay in finding a host, one stage may occupy a whole season. The term of its whole existence may, therefore, vary from 1^ to 3 years, and will in the majority of instances 302 Genus Ixodes last 1^ to 2 years. It seems, however, possible that a whole generation may be evolved in one season under very favourable conditions. Allowiug only ten days for a tick in the larval and pupal stages in which to harden after metamorphosis and to find a host, and 11 weeks for metamorphosis thereafter, Wheler calculates the time occupied as follows : Larva 13 weeks (1^ free, \ on host, 11 gorged). Nymph 13 „ (U „ I „ 11 „ )• Adult ? 7^ „ (U „ 2 „ 4 „ ). In one case the larvae fasted 40 weeks, and allowing 11 weeks for metamorphosis after an assumed feeding, practically a whole year would be accounted for. According to Kossel and his colleagues (1903, p. 43) it takes at least live months for a generation to develop ; our estimate, based on the following figures, gives the shortest period at about six months. On the basis of the observations here recorded, I would calculate the time it takes for a generation to develop on a warm-blooded host as follows : Days required Shortest period Longest period 8 27 42 49-252 10 300-570 3 6 Fecundated ? abandons the host. ¥ begins to oviposit after Larvae hatch out from the eggs after Larvae harden and wait to attack host No. 1 after Larvae remain upon the host for ... (Larvae, having abandoned the host, undergo metamorphosis. ) Nymphs issue from the larval skin after ... 28 84-140 Nymphs harden and wait to attack host No. 2 after 10 200-540 Nymphs remain upon the host for... ... 3 5 (Nymphs, liaving abandoned tlie liost, under- go metamorphosis.) Adults issue from the nymphal skiu after 50 210-360 Adults harden and wait to attack host No. 3 after 10 450-810 Adults ( ? s) remain upon the host for ... 8 14 Fecundated ? abandons the host Total = 178 days. 1345-2724 About 170 days probably represents the shortest possible time required for the completion of the life-cycle, if we deduct a few days from the usual time which appears to be necessary for hardening after Biology of 1. ricinns 303 ecdysis at each stage. It is quite clear that the time required may be very much prolonged under unfavourable conditions, and it is probable that in nature it is not infrequently prolonged to two and even three years. It should be noted that after very prolonged fasting we have frequently found various species of ticks too feeble to feed upon a host. Influence of Season and Local Conditions, etc. According to Kossel, Schutz, Weber and Miessner (1903, p. 39), ricinus, in Germany, occurs chiefly on damp water-logged land with rank vegetation comprised of long grass and bushes. Larvae and nymphs are found in large numbers on cattle, especially in May and June; few ticks in these stages are found on cattle at other seasons. The nymphs are the more commonly found throughout the year, and are more prone to attack man than the other stages. In the spring the larvae are encountered in masses on the ends of grass or twigs upon which they have climbed from the ground where the eggs were deposited by the female. Larvae, nymphs and females may be captured in a free state at the end of April, proving tiiat all stages may hibernate. They are readily captured by dragging a woollen clotii over infested grass and bushes. Samson (1909, p. 185) netted all stages from high grass along paths in damp woods about Berlin in the spring of the year. Kossel and his colleagues state that they are readily captured in the woods during the spring to autumn ; they are so numerous in some localities that when the cows return from pasture in the evening the farmers collect the ticks by the litre and feed them to chickens. Copulation. A survey of the literature shows that the process of copulation (or what I shall by preference term coupling^) in /. ricinus was observed at a very early date. De Geer (1778, p. 104) was the first to describe and figure the sexes coupled. In de Geer's figure the male is shown fixed with its venter upon the venter of the female, with its palps widely separated, and its chelicerae and hypostome deeply implanted in the female genital orifice, or vulva. Mtiller (1817, p. 278) also observed coupling in captive specimens, and stated that the sexes might remain thus united for a week. Gene (1844, p. 771) observed coupling during 1 The introduction of the s mouthparts into the vulva, hereinafter described, con- stitutes only a stage in the process of copulation ; see pp. 318 et seq. 304 Genus Ixodes May to October. He noted that the vulva appeared open in some females, whilst in others it appeared closed " as by a hymen," these being presumably virgins. He placed males with the latter and observed them enter into copulation. On turning the males over he saw that nought but the mouthparts had penetrated the vulva. He states that he actually saw three males coupling at once with one female : " fatto del quale non trovasi altri esempio negli annali della scienza^" Gene (p. 774), on closely observing coupling males, several times saw " two fusiform bodies, turgid and pearly white, protruding one on the right the other on the left of the median line close to the hypostome," When the male was disturbed these organs collapsed and were retracted into the interior of the mouthparts ; they could be clearly seen when they were slowly retracted. He concluded that these must be fecundating organs, but could not explain their mechanism, (We shall see that Lewis has also observed these organs.) C. L. Koch (1885-1844, p. 218) also expressed the belief that the male copulating organs are situated in the mouthparts. Von Siebold's (1850) statement that two fine ducts lead forward from the testes to the mouthparts of the male has never been confirmed. Pagenstecher (1861, p. 38), who described the male sexual organs, believed that the seminal fluid escapes from the male genital orifice when the sexes are apposed venter to venter, the genital orifices being approximated in some way for the purpose. Me'gnin (1878, p. xcii) affirms that the males possess a penis (!) which is directed toward the vulva by the male mouthparts. Glaus (1876, p. 574 and 1880, p. 652) wrongly states that the male capitulum is bent backward when coupling takes place, the reverse being the case. Bertkau (1881, p. 147) observed coupling, and he states that he found spermatozoa in all the females which had coupled under natural conditions or in captivity. Most of the females, on the other hand, which were found in a free state were found not to be fertilized. Bertkau holds that coupling constitutes copulation but does not explain how this can be the case. Wheler (1899, p. 7) states that he observed two pairs couple in a bottle after they had been captured on rushes. He also saw a male coupling with a gorged female after the specimens had been taken from a deer. He adds (xii. 1899) that coupling takes place between imfed adults and between replete females and males either upon the host or otherwise. He considered that the female became impregnated through the male ^ No subsequent author records any similar observations ; two of the males were, perhaps, only "crowding" the third. (See PI. VII, p. 310.) Biology of I. ricirms 305 mouth parts. Wheler sent specimens to Lewis (1900, p. 882) to study. The latter placed males and females together several times and repeatedly saw coupling occur. The male crept upon the venter of the female and probed about with its mouthparts, the palps being in their normal position whilst being passed to and fro across the vulva " until at length the female, which had remained hitherto entirely passive, began to show signs of responding : a slight, but very distinct alteration in colour of the surrounding parts took place, this being shortly followed by a relaxation of the peculiar crescent-shaped, flap-like opening. The palpi of the male were now immediately separated as widely as possible, the extremity of the rostrum was inserted under the flap and gradually pushed home until the entire organ was buried to its base." This union lasted some hours. Lewis gives figures of the sexes thus united, and of the $ and ^ hypostomes in ventral and lateral aspects. With regard to the cT hypostome he adds : " A little below the position of the last marginal teeth there are, however, what appear in a dry specimen to be two reflexed teeth, one on either side of the Fig. 283. Hypostome of Ixodes ricinus i in ventral and lateral aspects, showing at A, A^, the " tubular papillae " described by Lewis (1900, p. 385, PI. XXI, Figs. 4 and 5), median line, these being of larger size, thicker at the base and longer but not so sharp, and differing also in apparent structure from any others of their kind. On forcibly separating a male and female and examining the rostrum of the former immediately after its withdrawal from the vulva, I saw at once that these supposed teeth had increased in size and now presented the appearance of flexible semi-transparent tubular papillae, which conveyed the impression to my mind that here, possibly, were the organs by means of which the actual impregnation took place. I killed this tick without loss of time, and removing the entire capitulum before it had time to dry or contract, mounted it forth- with in glycerine. As thus mounted, with no preparation and no 306 Genus Ixodes pressure other than that of the coverglass, these papillae can still be seen in their distended condition under a ^-inch objective" (see Fig. 283). Lewis (21. VI. 1901) quotes a letter from Wheler in which the latter describes more fully his observations (previously referred to) made upon ticks placed in a bottle and which entered into union in the manner already described: " After about an hour I killed one pair with chloro- form and examined the female, without result. A second pair separated after a couple of hours. In this case plenty of spermatozoa were present in the female. There seems no doubt that I had separated the first pair prematurely. The third pair were still attached after 18 hours." Neumann (1906, p. 195) says correctly that coupling has actually been observed in but few species of Ixodes, but that in view of the homogeneity of the group it has been concluded that it is the rule in Ixodoidea : " the sperm being removed from the genital pore by the (/• rostrum and introduced into the $ pore." Neumann notes, ns we have done, that in no other genus of Ixodoidea are specimens received in which the sexes have died united and remained coupled in the preserva- tive fluid in which they were placed. He attributes this to the peculiar sexual dimorphism affecting the hypostome in Ixodes, meaning doubtless that the hypostomal teeth in the cTs are especially prominent. I agree that this appears to be the cause of the prolonged union not observed in any other genera and of many coupled pairs dying in situ. I may note, however, that in /. putus ^f the hypostome is practically unarmed, but that nevertheless the sexes couple as do other Ixodes. The subject certainly needs further study on living ticks (see further on pp. 317, 334-345). We have received many specimens of ricinus in alcohol which have died coupled, and frequently observed the coupled sexes alive on different hosts. Unfed and partially fed or replete females in captivity are promptly sought by the males. Under these conditions a male may be repeatedly driven away from a female and it will repeatedly return. At times the male is readily separated from the female ; at other times it dies in situ. Bertkau's observation, cited above, that females captured in a free state are rarely fertilized is doubtless explained by what Wheler (1906, p. 426) states regarding his never having found unfed females and males coupling under natural conditions upon herbage. On the other hand, when the unfed sexes were placed in a bottle, which was warmed by being carried in the pocket, coupling usually took place and lasted for hours. Samson (1909, p. 186) states that unfed ^fs may I Biology of I. riciiius 307 copulate and that $s may copulate several times; moreover that $s will only attach themselves to a host when fertilized, i.e. during or after copulation. The last statement requires confirmation. This author (p. 217) denies that the penetration of the (/ mouthparts into the % genital orifice (what we term coupling) represents coitus. On examining a $ which had been coupled for an hour with a cT, her goiioduct was found to be empty and no spermatophore was found in the ^Z* excretory ducts. That coitus should take place by means of the mouthparts of the f^ is difficult to understand because {a) the cT mouthparts cannot be brought in contact with the (/" genital orifice so as to receive the sperm therefrom ; (6) the structure of the (^ mouthparts shows no adaptation for this function ; and (c) the ^T mouthparts are immediately introduced into the vulva when the sexes meet. On one occasion what appeared to he true copulation was observed : a coupled pair had been observed for upwards of an hour when the ^40 0 Meles taxus 1 0 Lepus cuniculus . . . 1 0 Myopotamus coypu 1 0 Sciurus sp. 1 0 Canis vulpes 3' =L Canis familiaris . . . 3 + Ovis aries 1 + Sus scrofa 1 Homo sapiens 1 I. hexagonus var. 0 Lutra ... N. America. cookei ( (? ? known) 0 Mustela vison 0 Spermoplnlus 0 Weasel 0 Porcupine 0 Marmot 0 Pocket gopher ± Dog + Cat + Sheep I. canisuga ... ± Canis familiaris . . . ... 12 ^ Europe, N. Am- 0 ,, vulpes 2 erica. 0 Cotileriparia (bank-swallow) 3 0 Mustela furo ;2i 0 Meles taxus 0 Sciurus ... 0 Talpa europaea (larva) J + Equus caballus ... 1-2 + Ovis aries ) I.putus. On marine birds only ( c? only found in nests or beneath rocks and soil near nests) 0 Phalacrocorax verrucosus ... Europe, N. & S 0 Pygosceles taeniatus America, Asia, 0 Spheniscus magellanicus Australasia. 0 Fratercula arctica 3 0 Penguin sp. 2 0 Uria troile 1 0 Sea-gull sp. 1 0 Sula bassana 1 0 Fulmarus glacialis 1 0 Cormorant sp. 1 + Man (occasionally, see text, p. 34( )) 340 Ap2^e7idix II [62] Species Host's habits Number of Geographical times found distribution Host thereon of tick ^iy(c? found in caves etc. inhabited by bats). 0 0 0 0 0 0 Plecotus auritus ... ... Europe, Africa, Ehinolophus hipposideros Australia. ,, ferrum equinum ,, euryale ,, hippocrepis ,, blasius. 0 ,, clivosus 0 0 Vesperugo pipistrellus ,, tricolor. Ixodes putiis and vespertilionis are solely parasites of birds and bats, although putus may occasionally attack man when he approaches the infested birds' nests. With the exception of /. hexago7iiis\ including var. cookei, of which we have no particulars, the males of these species have never, apparently, been captured upon the host. On the other hand, the males of the other species have been found in the habitats of their hosts : canisuga in the nests of sand-martins (bank-swallows) and in a dog kennel, vespertilionis in caves inhabited by hats, putus in and about the nests of marine birds. In such localities the males would have ample opportunities of feeding upon their hosts for brief periods after the manner of male Argasidae, assuming that they do feed. It is conceivable, however, that such habitat-infesting males may not be blood-suckers at all. We have seen that Ornithodorus megnini J" does not feed, and that it nevertheless fertilizes the female. The same may hold for certain Ixodidae ^'^^- THE MACMILLAN COMPANY NEW YORK THE JOURNAL OF HYGIENE EDITED BY GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL, M.D., Ph.D., Sc.D., F.R.S. QUICK PR0FE8S0B OF BIOLOGY IN THE UNIVEKSITY OF CAMBRIDGE IN CONJUNCTION WITH JOHN S. HALDANE, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S. ARTHUR NEWSHOLME, C.B., M.D. LATE READRB IN PHYSIOLOGY IN THE MEDICAL OFFICER TO THE UNIVERSITY OP OXFORD LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOARD CHARLES J. MARTIN, M.B., D.Sc, F.R.S. DIEBCTOB OP THE USTEE INSTITUTE, LONDON J. C. G. LEDINGHAM, M.B., D.Sc. G. S. GRAHAM-SMITH, M.D. BACTERI0L0OI8T-IN- CHIEF, LISTER INSTITUTE, UNIVEESITY LECTURER IN HYGIENE, LONDON CAMBRIDGE M. GREENWOOD, Junr., M.R.C.S. STATISTICIAN, LISTER INSTITUTE, LONDON The Journal of Hygiene ia issued as material accumtdates. A volume containing about 500 pages, with plates and figures, is issued annually. Volumes I, II, and III (1901-3) complete. In Four Parts, paper covers 15s. net per volume. Bound in buckram, 18s. 6c?. net per volume. Volumes IV-XIV (1904-14) complete. In Four Parts, paper covers, 21s. net per volume. Bound in buckram, 25». net per volume. The subscription price is £1. Is. per volume (post-free), payable in advance Subscriptions may be sent to any Bookseller, or to Mr C. F. CLAY, Manager Cambridge University Press, Fetter Lane, London, E.C. CONTENTS OF VOL. XV, NO. 1 (July 1915) Hewlett, R. T. and Revis, C. On a Complement-stimulating Sub- stance in Cow's Milk. Brownlee, J. Studies in the Meaning and Relationships of Birth and Death Rates. II. Density of Population and Death Rate (Fan's Law). III. The Constitution of a Death Rate. (With one Chart.) IV. On the Range of Instances in which Geometrical Pro- gressions describe numerically processes of life, i.e. those processes which might be explained by a monomolecular reaction. V. On the difficulty that in applying the laws of physical chemistry to life processes, indices occur which suggest the actions of fractions of a molecule. Radcliffe, J. A. D. Complement Fixation in Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Mackintosh, J., Pennington, S. and Williams, R. S. The Supply of Non-tuberculous Dairy Stock. Haffkine, W. M. Concerning Inoculation against Plague and Pneu- monia and the Experimental Study of Curative Methods. Fletcher, W. The Wassermann and Luetin Reactions in Leprosy. EwART, R. J. The Influence of Age of the Grandparent at the Birth of the Parent on the Number of Children born and their Sex. (With one Text-figure.) Taylor, F. E. The Sterilisation of Vaccines ; and the Influence of the Various Methods Employed on their Antigenic Properties. (With one Chart.) TICKS A MONOGRAPH OF THE IXODOIDEA PART III CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS C. F. CLAY, Manager ILonton: FETTEK LANE, E.G. GEDinburgl): 100 PRINCES STREET ILontJon: H. K. LEWIS AND CO., 130, GOWER STREET, W.C. ILontion : WILLIAM WESLEY AND SON, 28, ESSEX STREET, STRAND ^t<03 lotk: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS JSombng, fflalciitta unb ffialiras: MACMILLAN AND CO., Ltd. STorcnto: J. M. DENT AND SONS, Ltd. rcikun: THE MARUZEN-KATUISHIKI-KAISHA All rights reserved Prof. L.-G. NEUMANN of Toulouse To whom we dedicate this fasciculus in grateful acknowledgment of the help he has given us TICKS A MONOGRAPH OF THE IXODOIDEA By GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL, M.A., M.D., Ph.D., Sc.D., F.R.S., Fdlow of Magdalene College, Quick Professor of Biology, University of Cambridge CECIL WARBURTON, M.A., F.Z.S., Christ's College, Zoologist to the Royal Agricultural Society W. F. COOPER, B.A., F.Z.S., F.L.S., of the Cooper Laboratory for Economic Research, Watford L. E. ROBINSON, A.R.C.Sc. (Lond.), of the Cooper Laboratory for Economic Research, Watford PART HI Cambridge : at the University Press 1915 IXODIDAE Part III. The Genus Haemaphysalis by GEORGE H. F. NUTTALL and CECIL WARBURTON PREFACE TO PART III WE have little to add to what has been stated in the Preface to Part II. The present fasciculus follows in order and deals with the genus Haemaphysalis of which we recognize 50 species and varieties ; three species (spinulosa, ohtusa and numidiana) being included although we are somewhat doubtful as to their validity. Many species hitherto regarded as valid are noted in our synonymic lists. All of our descriptions are original ; they include three new species and three new varieties, abeiTant forms and numerous hitherto un- described stages of known species. The terms and signs used are the same as in Part II, pp. 127-182, to which the reader is referred. Illusti^itions. We again lay stress upon the illustrations. Those appearing in the six plates are republished from papers by Nuttall, Cooper- and Robinson, and Nuttall respectively, and comprise 29 figures in addition to 144 figures in the text, making a total of 173 figures illustrating this Part. Of these figures, 24 are taken from other authors, the impressions being made from the original blocks. The majority of the new text-figures were drawn under our direction by Mr N. Cunliffe. The genus Haemaphi/salis has been very poorly illustrated hitherto and we have sought to make good this deficiency, many species, including their immature stages, being now figured for the first time. Of the 72 new text-figures 45 were drawn by N. Cunliffe 24 „ ,, G. H. P. Nuttall 2 „ „ N. Cunlitfe and E. Wilson 1 was drawn by C. Warburton Of the 72 previously J 21 are from publications by C. Warburton published text-figures^ 21 ,, ,, L. G. Neumann 17 „ „ C. Warburton and G. H. F. Nuttall 9 ,, ,, G. H. F. Nuttall 2 ,, ,, W. Donitz 1 is from a publication by L. E. Robinson 1 ,, ,, Nuttall, Cooper and Robinson 144 Most of the figures were drawn to scale, others, not so drawn, are described as " sketches." vi P^'eface A chno wledf) men ts. We gratefully acknowledge the generous gift of £100 from Mr and Mrs P. A. Molteno towards the expenses of publishing this work. We are especially indebted to the following gentlemen and institu- tions for access to material : Professor L.-G. Neumann (lately of Toulouse) has kindly lent us all of his types and has presented us with co-types wherever possible in exchange for similar specimens from our collection. We have to thank Dr L. Lavarra (Rome), Professor Gestro (Genoa Museum), Professor A. Brauer (Berlin Museum), Professor S. Schenkling (Deutsches Entomologisches Museum, Berlin-Dahlem) and Mr S. Hirst (British Museum) for the gift of co-types. We have received numerous specimens from the Imperial Bureau of Entomology (Mr Guy A. K. Marshall, Secretary) and from the many gentlemen whose names are mentioned as collectors in the text. The bracketed numbers accompanying the " records of specimens from different countries relate to catalogues in particular collections severally indicated by a letter or the name of the collection before the number. Thus all numbers preceded by " N " relate to specimens in our collection ; those preceded by " E " relate to specimens received for identification from the Imperial Bureau of Entomology, London. Other collections we have examined and determined are as follows : (Ash- worth) = Dr J. H. Ashworth, Zoological Department, University of Edinburgh ; (Berlin Mus.) = Zoologischcs Museum, Berlin ; (D.E.M.) = Deutsches Entomologisches Museum, Berlin-Dahlem ; (Genoa Mus.) = Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Genoa ; (Gowdey) = Mr C. C. Gowdey, Government Entomologist, Entebbe, Uganda ; (Ind. Mus.) = Indian Museum, Calcutta; (K.) = Mr N. B. Kinnear, Bombay Natural History Society; (Knuth)= Professor Knuth, Tierarztliche Hochschule, Berlin; (Liverpool) = Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine ; (Schtiffner) = Dr W. Schtitfner, Deli, Sumatra ; (Sweet) — Dr Georgina Sweet, University of Melbourne, Australia. Where two numbers are connected by = (thus E. 692 = N. 3153) the sign indicates that the specimens have been divided between the two collections E. and N. As stated in Part II, we shall be grateful to readers who may draw our attention to any errors and omissions. G. H. F. N. C. W. Cambridge, Septembe); 1915. CONTENTS OF PART III II. THE GENUS UAKMAPHYSALIS C. L. KOCH, 1814. Synonymy and Literature relating to the Genus ...... The Generic Characters defined ......... Keys for the determination of species of Hacmaphjsalia : Males Females Nymi)hs . Larvae Note to terms used ........... PAGE 349 351 Specific descriptions of valid s[)ecics and of their varieties N.B. The signs J^, 5 j o, L alongside of the specific names, indicate the various developmental stages (male, female, nymph, larva) which are known to science 1. inermis c^, ^, o, L . „ var. aponommoidcH 5 2. warhiirtoni J , $ 3. cinnaharina ^ ^ $ , o, L . „ var. p^mctata ^ , ? , o. 4. leporis-palmtris (^ , 9 ? o> L 5. inontgomeryi (^ , ? . 6. kinneari $ 7. uhurensis $ 8. fonnoseiisis S ■> 9 ' • 9. japonica ^ ,, var. douglasi (^ 10. papiiana ^ , 9 > O) L 11. Jlava (^,9 12. turturis ^ 13. aciculifer ^, 9 14. kochi (^, $ 15. birmaniae ,^ 16. silacca $ . 1 7. parmata ^ , 9 ? o, L 353 356 359 360 361 362 362 367 369 372 378 387 395 397 398 400 402 403 404 408 410 411 413 415 416 418 Vlll Contents 18. hystricis c?) ? • 19. bispinosa ^, $ , o, L „ var. intermedia ^, $ 20. parva (^ , $ , o, L . 21. cuspidata (^, $ , o, L 22. aculeata (^, $ 23. calcarata (J , ? , o . „ var. houyi ^, 24. calvus cJ, $ 25. spinigera ^ , '^ „ var. novae-guineae c , 9 , 26. concinna (^ , $ , o, L 27. simplex ^ , o . 28. ^eofcAi (J , $ , o, L 29. spinulosa $ 30. ohtusa $ . 31. numidiana cJ, $ 32. tvellingtoni ^ , $ , o, L 33. doenitzi cf, ?. 34. /iooo?j (^ , $ , o, L „ var. orientalis ^ , 9 35. hancrofti ^ , 9 » O) L 36. campanidata $, 9 37. howletti cj, ? • 38. vidita ^ . 39. humerosa (^ , ? , o 40. elongata ^ , ? 41. cornigera ^, 9 ,, var. anomala (^ 42. dentipalpis ^ . Geographical distribution and host« of th List of condemned and doubtful species synonymy and literature, by G. H Notes on the Biology of Haemaphysalis by G. H Haemaphysalis cinnaharina var. punctata „ cinnabanna „ leporis-palustris „ leachi „ coticinna . „ inermis Index to valid species of Haemapkys^ e Genus Haemaphysalis of Ha,emaphysalis, including F. Nuttall . Nuttall their alis^ together with a list of the collections in which the types and co-types are to be found PAGE 422 426 433 435 438 440 442 444 445 447 449 452 458 460 476 477 478 479 482 483 486 487 491 493 495 496 498 500 504 505 507 512 518 519 528 530 536 542 545 548 TICKS PLATE VIII oLors&l aspect ^^s.- ventraL aspect E Wilson, Cambridge HAEMAPHYSALIS PUNCTATA Can 5c Fan, The Larva TICKS N^mph Female (unfed) dorsal aspect Female (replete) 0 If ventral/ aspect HAEMAPHYSAL PLATE IX Male (replete) Male (unfed) E.Wilson.del et Uth Cambridge NGTATA Can. b. Fan. TICKS s.oh'' Fig.1. d.ch^ 9- dLOCGO^V - Fig.2. L.E.Iiancl JTorddel. Fig.3. s.ch- ^0 ..-d/ ch ch'. ■I :# ''s.d. bloc, cav Fig.4. PLATE X d.ch sh. \ I s.chr ■ '.>b.c. Fig.5. ■ s ch. F.g.6. d.ch d ch. 3s,2. > 3 if. ••:b.c. Fig.7. Morgan J. Kidd Richmond CoUoty Fig.8. TICKS PLATE XI a, nip. . - - '.ch. Fig. sh.. Fig.4. s.ch kd. pr Fig. 2. sh. LERand J, Ford. del. Fig.5. Fig. 6. Morgan 4Kidd Riohmond Collotype. TICKS PLATE XII W^ 1 Fig. I Fig-. 2 1# Fig-- 3 Fig:- 4 Fig. 5 TICKS PLATE XIII Fig. I Fig. 2 LIST OF ILLUSTEATIONS Frontispiece : Portrait of Professor L.-G. Neumann . . facing Title-page PLATES' Facing p. viii Plate VIII. Haemaphysalis cinnaharina var. punctata Larva : dorsal and ventral aspeets, x 62. Drawn from living specimen by J. Ford. Plate IX. Haemaphysalis cinnabariaa \ar. punctata Nymph in dorsal aspect, x 30. Female unfed, in dorsal jispect, x 20. „ gorged, in dorsal aspect, x 5 detail of siu-face more highly magnified to left. „ gorged, ventral aspect, x 5. Spiracle to right. Male unfed, dorsal aspect, x 15. „ replete, ventral aspect, x -20. ,, unfed. Posterior portion of ventral surface, showing appearance of festoons for comparison with those of the replete male, x 20. Drawn from living specimens by E. Wilson. Plate X. Haemaphysalis cinnaharina var. punctata Fig. 1. Capitulum of Female, dorsal aspect, x 85. Fig. 2. „ „ „ ventral aspect, x 85. Fig. 3. ,, „ Male, dorsal aspect, xllO. Fig. 4. ,, „ „ median portion with left palp, in ventral aspect, X 125. Fig. 5. „ ,, Nymph, dorsal aspect, x 220. Fig. 6. „ „ „ ventral aspect, x 220. Fig. 7. „ „ Larva, dorsal aspect, x400. Fig. 8. „ „ „ ventral aspect, x400. ' N.B. Plates VIII — XI are reprinted from Nuttall, Cooper and Robinson, vi. 1908 (Pis. VIII and XI); Plates XII and XIII are reprinted from Nuttall, iv. 1904 (Pis. XII and XIII). List of llhistratlons Plate XI. Haeindphijsalis cinnaharina var. punctata Fig. 1. Female : tactile hairs on infra-internal margin of palji, x 250. Fig. 2. Male : ventral surface, showing details of external structure, x30. Fig. 3. Larva : chelicerae, seen from the ventral surface, x 1000. Fig. 4. Female : right chelicera, seen from the ventral surface ; the sheath removed, x 250. Fig. 5. Male : left chelicera, seen from the ventral surface, x 250. Fig. 6. Male : light chelicera, lateral aspect ; sheath removed, x 250. Plate XII. tlueinaphysalis leuchi Fig. 1. Female ovipositing, ca. x 2^. Fig. 2. Larvae as they appear on emerging from the egg ; dorsal aspects, x20. Fig. 3. Nymph (unfed) ; ventral aspect. Balsam mount, x 20. Fig. 4. Showing three gorged nymphs in the centre, an unfed male to the left, an unfed female to the right. The male appears glossier than the female because of the scutum which covers its whole dorsum. The adults ai'e about the same size as the gorged nymphs from which they emerge. Fig. 5. Male in ventral aspect. Balsam mount, x 20. Plate XIII. Ilaemaphysalis leachi Fig. 1. Female in ventral asi)ect ; the scutum being seen by trans- parency. The body appears broader than in the male, x 20. Fig. 2. Male capitulum in ventral aspect, x 150. IN THE TEXT FIOrRE 308. Illustrating llaem essential parts 314. „ ivarburtoni (^ , dorsum and essential parts 315. ,, ,, $ , essential parts 316. „ cinnabarina ^, dorsum and essential parts 317. „ „ $ , essential parts . 318. „ „ ? , caijitulum and scutum 319. ,, „ o, essential parts 320. „ „ L, „ „ . . . 321. „ cinnabarina var. punctata : (J, dorsum and essential parts. 322. 9 , essential parts .... 351 363 364 365 366 368 370 371 373 374 374 375 376 381 382 List of IlhistrationH XI 323. Haemaphysalis 324. 325. 326. 327. 328. 329. „ 330. 331. 332. 333. 334. 335. 336. 337. 338. 339. 340. 341. 342. 343. 344. 345. 346. 347. 348. 349. 350. „ 351. 352. „ 353. „ 354. 355. 356. „ 357. 358. 359. „ 360. „ 361. 362. „ 362a. „ 363. 364. 365. cinnabarina var. pidictata : 9, capituluiu, scutmii, spiracle and tarsus IV o, dorsum and essential parts . leporis-palvMris ^, dorsum and essential parts „ ,, 9 > essential parts „ „ 9 > palps, tarsi I and IV . „ „ o, essential parts montfiompryi (^ , doi'suni and essential parts „ 9 ) essential parts . kinneari 9 ? essential i)arts .... ahorensis 9 • formoaends ^, dorsum and essential paiis „ $ , essential parts japonica ^, dorsum ..... „ (^, venter, spiracle papuana ^, dorsum, venter, spiracle 9 , capitulum, scutum, spiracle . » c?> atypical form : dorsum and essential parts „ o, essential parts .... flava (^, dorsum, coxae and spiracle . „ 5 1 essential 2>arts .... ttirturis ^ , dorsum and essential parts admlifer (J, „ „ „ „ ,, 9 J essential parts loc/n (^, dorsum and essential i)arts 5 , capitulum and scutum . hirmaniae ^, dorsum and essential parts . silacea 9 ■, dorsum and essential parts parmata (J, „ „ „ „ „ 9 ? essential paits .... ■>■> '^i 11 11 • • • • 11 '-'i 11 11 • • • • hystricia ^, dorsum and essential i)arts „ ^, dorsum, venter and spiracle . „ 9 ? essential parts .... „ 9 1 dorsum and essential i)arts bispinosa ^, dorsum, venter, spiracle, tarsus I\ ,, (^, dorsiun, part of venter, etc. . „ 9 ) essential parts „ 9 > P^ip ^iid tarsus IV ,, o, essent'al parts » ^1 11 11 ... bispinosa var. intermedia ^, capitulum „ „ „ 9 ) capitulum, scutum, etc parva (^, dorsum ....... PAGE 382 383 389 390 390 391 392 395 396 398 399 400 401 403 403 404 405 406 407 409 409 411 412 413 414 41G 417 419 419 420 420 423 423 424 424 427 428 429 429 430 430 434 434 436 Xll List of Illustrations FIGURK 366. Haemaphysalu 367. n 368. » 369. M 370. » 371. » 372. » 373. J> 374. 55 375. 55 376. 55 377. 55 378. 55 379. 55 380. 55 381. 55 382. 55 383. 55 384. 55 385. 55 386. 55 387. 55 388. 55 389. 55 390. 55 391. 5* 392. 5) 393. )5 394. 55 395. 55 396. 55 397. 55 398. 55 399. 55 400. 55 401. )5 402. 55 403. 55 404. 55 405. 55 406. 55 407. 55 408. 55 409. 55 parva ^, capituliim in ventral aspect, coxae I cuspidata (^ , dorsum, etc. .... „ $ , capituluin, scutum, etc. „ o, essential parts 55 ^^i )5 )» ... aculeata (^ , dorsum, etc 55 ? ) capitulum, scutum, etc. . calcarata (J, dorsimi, venter, spiracle and tarsus IV „ c^, palp „ ^, coxae and trochanters . „ $ , essential parts .... caltms (J, dorsum, venter, etc „ 5 , essential parts ..... spinigera (J, capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspect: „ 1^, coxae, palp, digit .... „ 9 5 scutimi, capitulum, tarsus IV „ 5 , coxae and spiracle .... spinigera var. novae-guineae (J, dorsum, venter, etc. „ ,, „ „ $ , essential parts „ „ „ „ o, dorsum, venter, etc. eoncinna ^, dorsum, part of venter, etc. „ (^, capitulum )j 6^ hypostome 6, digit .... „ $ ) essential parts 11 ^1 51 )5 • • )) -Lis )) )) • • simplex ^, dorsum, part of venter, etc. „ (^ , digit and palp . „ (J, coxae and trochanters „ ^, tar.sus IV . leachi (J, dorsum, etc. „ (^, showing variation in size „ (J, capitulum .... ,, (J, coxae ..... „ ^ and $ , digits „ 9 , dorsum and part of venter . „ o, dorsum, venter, etc. „ L, capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects ,, L, scutum ..... „ L, venter „ 9 , " var. indica" essential parts ,, (^ , " I'oningshergeri" dorsum etc „ 9 5 )) scutum, capitulum, spir acle, tarsus IV . PAGE 436 438 438 439 439 441 441 442 442 443 443 444 445 446 447 448 448 448 450 451 451 453 453 454 454 455 455 456 459 459 459 459 462 462 463 463 463 463 465 465 465 466 468 468 468 List of Illustrations Xlll FIGURE 411. Haemaphysali 412. )) 413. >» 414. » 415. » 416. »j 417. >» 418. 5» 419. )> 420. » 421. >> 422. » 423. )5 424. 5> 425. » 426. )> 427. 5) 428. »> 429. » 430. )> 431. » 432. 5) 433. )5 434. )i 435. )? 436. )) 437. )) 438. >7 439. )5 440. )) 441. )? 442. >5 443. J) 444. )» 445. » 446. >5 447. U 448. )> 449. » 450. t spinulosa 9 > scutum aiitl capital um . „ 9 > ventral aspect of capituluni, coxae I obtusa (^ , capitulum in dorsal ami ventral aspects, coxae I . numidiana ^, dorsum part of venter, etc. „ $ , scutum, capitulum, .spiracle wellingtoni ^, dorsum and venter „ 9 > dorsiun „ 9 ) hypostome and digit . „ o, essential parts doenitzi ^, dorsum .... „ 5 5 scutum, capitulum, spiracle, tarsus IV hoodi (^, dorsum, etc. .... „ 9 , scutum, capitulum, etc. „ o, essential parts >? '-'■) 11 )) • • • bancrofti ^, dorsum and essential parts „ 9 , essential parts » o, » „ • • campanulata ^, dorsum, coxae, spiracle „ $ , scutum, capitulum, spiracle, tarsus 1\ howletti (^ , dorsum and essential parts „ $ , essential parts . vidua ^, dorsum, etc. hnmerosa (^ , dorsum, etc. . „ $ , scutum and capitulum . elongata ^, dorsum and essential parts „ (^, pal]), part of venter „ 9 , dorsum part of venter, spiracle, tarsus I\ cornigera ^, „ „ „ „ „ (^, capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects coxae ...... (?, palp „ (J, coxae and trochanters „ $ , essential parts . „ var. anomcda ^J, capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects . dentipalpis ^ , capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects ^'^ longicomis" Nn. $> palp and coxa I cinnabarina var. punctata, longitudinal section of capi tulum „ „ „ process of oviposition . PAGE 476 476 477 478 478 480 480 480 480 481 482 482 484 484 485 485 488 488 489 489 491 491 493 494 495 496 496 499 499 500 501 502 502 502 503 504 505 513 525 527 349 Genus II. HAEMAPHYSALIS C. L. Koch, 1844. Synonymy and Literature. The following references only relate to publications which deal with the genus or cognate matters. Ixodes 1827. Audouin, p. 428 (/. lcachii=H. leachi). 1849. Gervais, p. 49 (/. lagotis= Haemaphysalis n]).). 1869. Packard, p. 67 (/. chordeilis=H. cinna- harina Koch ; /. leporis-palustris = U. leporis-palustris). 1880. Megnin, p. 132 (7. chelifer=H. concinna Koch ^). See further under our list of condemned species. Haemapliysalis 1844. Koch, p. 237 (genus first defined. Four species : 1 H. rosea, 2 cinnabarina, 3 sanguinolenta, and 4 concinna, of which dnnaharina and concinna are good species). 1847. Koch, p. 25. 1877. Canestrini and Fanzago, p. 110 ; Murray, p. 199. 1890. Canestrini, pp. 483, 493. 1892. Canestrini, p. 581 ; Marx (a), p. 233, (6), p. 283 ; Trouessart, p. 47. 1895. Railliet, p. 714 (nothing original). 1897. Neumann, pp. 326, 358 (key for determination) ; Supino, pp. 241, 243. 1900. Ward (a), p. 200 (nothing original). 1901. Salmon and Stiles, pp. 457-459, figs. 219-221 (from Neumann, 1897 ; they give short generic diagnosis, synonymy, bibliography and transla- tion of Neumann's key). 1905. Labille, pp. 14, 15, 44, 154. 1906. Buy, p. 118 (generic characters tabulated) ; Wheler, p. 420. 1907. Donitz, pp. 15, 67, 111 ; Hunter and Hooker, p. 52 (incomplete generic diagnosis) ; Pocock, p. 190 (key to genera of ticks) ; Warburton (a), p. 92, pi. VII, fig. 2 (classifica- tion briefly treatedl 1908. Banks, pp. 13, 20, 32 ; Bonnet, p. 259 (condensed from Neumann), figs. 28-30 (poor) ; Nuttall (VII), p. 16 (oviposition described and figured) ; Nuttall, Cooper and Robinson, p. 155 ; Warburton (IV), p. 508 (diflficulties of classification discussed). 1909. Blanchard, pp. 145-147 (generic characters defined, key to species following Neumann) ; Hunter (VI), p. 255 (thinks ground birds disseminate immature stages) ; Rohr, p. 141 (nothing original, quotes Neumann and Aragao). 1911. Neumann (cr), p. 105 (gives key to 13 species recognised as valid together with brief notes on 13 doubtful species ; four species comprise nine subspecies) ; Nuttall, p. 67 (habits of ticks in relation to hosts ; behaviour of male considered) ; Nuttall and Merriman, p. 44 (males of this genus, in common with other Metastriate ticks, have a ehitinous flap over the sexual orifice) ; Nuttall and Warburton, p. 119 (of this book ; generic characters fre.shly defined and figured). 1912. Hooker, Bishopp and Wood, p. 89 (nothing original) ; Warburton (VII), p. 122 (generic charactei-s discussed). 1913. Nuttall, p. 195 (structure of hypostome and variability observed in the genus) ; Patton and Cragg, p. 627 (genus defined and key for determination taken from Neumann, 1911 a). N. I. 23 350 Genus Haemaphysalis Wrongly spelt Haemophijsalis by Canestrini, 1884, p. 113, and by a few other authors. Haemaphysalis concinna Koch, designated as the type of the genus by Neumann, 1901, p. 340. Rhipistoma 1844. Koch, p. 239 (two species : 1 R. leachii, 2 R. ellipticum). 1847. Koch, p. 27 (but on p. 135 R. ellipticum is transferred to the genus Rhipi- cephalus ; both ellipticum and leachii, however, = Haemaphysalis leachi (Audouin, 1827). 1861. Furstenberg, p. 208. 1878. Karsch, p. 337 ("ii. leachii"). 1888. Dugfes, p. 129. 1890. Canestrini, p. 483.^ 1892. Marx (a), p. 233 ; (6), p 283. 1896. Osborn, p. 261 {R. leporis which = //aema- physalis leporis-palustris (Packard, 1869)). 1897. Neumann, p. 326 (given as a synonym of Haemaphysalis). 1901. Salmon and Stiles, p. 457 (follow Neumann as do also subsequent authors). Wrongly spelt Rhipidostoma by Karsch, 1878 ; Duges, 1888 ; also misspelt Rhiphistoma by Osborn, 1896, and the authors who quote him and the spelling of the foregoing writers. Rhipistoma leachii Koch, may well be designated as the type of the genus although R. ellipticum might serve as well ; since they are synonymous. Salmon and Stiles, 1901, p. 457, cite Marx as if he had designated '' H. leachii" as the type, but he did not do so. Rhipicephalus 1847. Koch, p. 135 {R. llipticus = H. leachi). 1877. L. Koch (6), p. 196 {R. e.vpositicius = moat probably H. cinnabarina \a.v. punctata (Canestrini and Fanzago, 1877). Gonixodes 1888. Dugfes, p. 129. 1897. Neumann, p. 343 (as a synonym of HaemapJiysalis ; subsequent authors agree with Neumann. Gonixodes rostralis Dugfes, the only species = partly Haemaphysalis leporis-palustris (Packard, 1869)). Herpetobia 1890. Canestrini, pp. 486, 493, 527. 1891. Canestrini, p. 719. 1897. Neumann, pp. 327, 329 (as a synonym of Haemaphysalis ; we agree with Neumann. Herpetobia sidcata Canestrini, the only species = probably Haemaphysalis cinnabarina var. punctata (Canestrini and Fanzago, 1877) ; immature stages which Canestrini, 1891, p. 719, supposed might prove to belong to one of the already established genera). Opisthodon 1897. Canestrini, p. 468 {0. cuscobius the type = H. cuscobia, a nominal species). Supino (o) and (6), p. 252, gives the following 3 species : 1 0. asiaticus, which Neumann regards as a nominal species : we have examined the type and find it to be H. leachi; 2 0. canestrinii, and 3 0. gestroi Supino = likewise H. leachi. Neumann, 1897, p. 326, gives Opisthodon as a synonym of Haema- physalis, with which we agree. Wrongly spelt Opistodon by Wheler, 1906, p. 420, and either authors. Prosopodon 1897. Canestrini (a), p. 417 (name proposed as a substitute for Opisthodon which the author found to be preoccupied ; one species, P. cziscobiics = merely a nominal species). Merely listed by Blanchard, 1909, p. 150, and Neumann, 1911a, p. 105. Not Pseudixodes Haller, 1882, p. 311, as stated by Canestrini, 1890, pp. 485-526. Generic Characters 351 Generic Characters : Metastriata, i.e., with anal grooves embracing the i(7ius poster io)iy. Usually of small size. Scutum inornate and without eyes, and in the female, without lateral grooves. Capitulum With base sub-rectangular, and with palps normally short and conical, broadest near the posterior end of article 2, which {except in rare cases) projects laterally beyond the base. Sexual dimorphism slight, the male possessing no ventral plates or shields. Coxa I never bifid ; trochanter I with a blade-like dorsal retrograde process. The chief difficulties presented by the genus Haemaphysalis arise from the absence of characteristics — such as eyes, colour-markings, anal armature in the ^, etc. — which are of great specific value in other genera. The prevailing colour is yellow, in ungorged specimens, and the general integument is rather highly chitinised, so that those structures which in most ticks are conspicuous by their comparative <,aJ/:a^ '^'^^^■^ i^/'o^'i*:/! Fig. 308. HdemitjiJnjmlis loellimitoni s in dorsal and ventral aspects, ? in dorsal aspect. (Reprinted from Pai't II, Fig. 120.) To show the generic characters and nomenclature of parts. hardness stand out in less salient relief. Thus, the scutum of an unfed nymph is sometimes only visible after rather close examination. The capitulum is in most cases much alike in the cf and % so that in many species identification is almost equally easy from either sex. There are exceptional cases, however (e.g. H. concinna, H. cornigera, etc.), in which the ^ palps have striking peculiarities not found in those of the % . The sexes are more frequently dimorphic as regards the coxal armature. Wherever the coxal spines are strongly developed in the produced backward (Australia) . . . humerosa 497 lOtherwise ........ 2 (Basis capituli with ventral cornua . . .3 i „ „ without ventral cornua . . 5 jBasis capituli rectangular (N. and S. America) . leporis-palusti^is 391 1 „ „ with pointed projecting sides . 4 /-Occurring in Europe, N. Africa, Asia Minor, \ Transcaucasia .... cinnabarina var. punctata 382 lOccurring in N. and S. America . . . cinnabarina 375 j'Palp with lateral salience slight, articles 2 and 3 sub-equal ....... 6 .10 6. iPalps with lateral salience marked Cornua veiy strong (Ceylon) inconspicuous ^ (Palpal article 3 longer than 2 (Asia) I „ „ 2 at least as long as 3 cuspidata 439 7 ivellingtoni 481 8 360 Genus Haemaphy sails PAGE [Scutum broader than long (Africa) . . . parmata 420 I „ sub-circular . . . . . .9 Basis capituli shorter than palps ; lateral palpal salience rounded (Asia) .... papuana 406 9. i Basis capituli as long as palps, lateral salience pointed (Asia, E. Africa, New South Wales) hispinosa 430 or (India, Ceylon) parva 437 rPalp with lateral salience bearing a ventral 10. \ retrograde point 11 I „ without such a point . . . .13 rCoxal spurs distinct and sharp (Africa) . . calcarata 443 11- i or c, var. houyi^ 445 I „ „ weak and inconspicuous . . .12 -^2 (Refer to Figure (Africa, Asia, N. S. Wales) . leachi 465 i „ „ „ (New Guinea, Queensland) spinigera var. novae-guineae 450 13 JTrochantal spurs present (Queensland) . , hancrofti 490 1 „ „ absent 14 rBasis capituli with sides rounded; no cornua 14. \ (Europe) concinna 455 IBasis capituli rectangular ; with distinct cornua . 15 [Tarsi humped (Madagascar) .... simplex 458 1 „ otherwise (Africa) hoodi 485 Larvae. We know the larvae of 14 species and varieties. All known larvae have hypostomes with dentition 2 j 2. (Basis capituli with ventral cornua (America) leporis-palustris 391 (Basis capituli otherwise 1 rPalps, when joined, forming an obtuse angle 1. \ (Africa, Asia, N. S. Wales) .... leachi 465 IPalps otherwise ...... 2 {Palpal article 2 not protruding laterally (Europe, Transcaucasia) inermis 365 Palpal article 2 protruding .... 3 ^ H. calcarata var. hoinji has a slight ventral spur on trochanter I which is not discoverable in the type o. Key to sjyecies 361 3. 5. G. Basis capituli without distinct cornua „ „ otherwise (Basis capituli without projecting lateral angles 1 „ „ with projecting lateral angles (Europe, N. Africa, Asia Minor, Transcaucasia) . cinnabarina var. punctata or (America) .... cinnabarina .Basis capituli with posterior border straight (Europe) ...... (Asia, E. Africa, N. S. Wales) . { (Africa) (India, Ceylon) ..... Basis capituli with posterior border concave (Asia) jCoxa I spinose ...... ( „ I with blunt tuberosity (Africa) Coxae II and III unarmed (Ceylon) . „ II and III slightly armed Basis capituli broader than long (Queensland) . bancrofti „ „ narrow (Asia) .... papiuma concinna bispinosa parmata parva wellingtoni 7 hoodi cuspidata 383 375 456 431 420 437 481 485 439 490 407 I^ote to Terms and Signs. Ventral corruia is a new term whereby we describe processes protruding from the postero-lateral angles of the ventral surface of the basis capituli. So far we have only observed them in H. leporis-palustris (all stages ; see Figs. 325, .326, 328, 329), and in H. cinnabarina (o and L ; see Figs. 319, 320), as well as in its var. punctata (o and L, Fig. 324). Spiracle. The letters A and D, in connection with the figures of the spiracle, indicate its orientation with regard to the body of the tick : A = anterior, D = dorsal. The explanation of the other terms and signs will be found in Part II. pp. 127-132. 362 SPECIFIC DESCRIPTIONS OF VALID SPECIES OF HAEMAPHYSALIS AND OF THEIR VARIETIES 1. HAEMAPHYSALIS INERMIS Birula, 1895. Figs. 309-312. Lit., Synon. and Icon. : Haemaphysalis inermis Birula, 1895, pp. 360, 361, PI. II, Figs. 7-9 ( 5 capitiilum, showing porose areas, anus, coxa I ; evidently drawn from balsam-mounted si)ecimen, therefore misleading) ; Latin description of $ only. Neumann, 1901, p. 264 ; gives French translation of Birula's description. Neumann, 1911 o, p. 116; listed as a doubtful species. Haemaphysalis amhigua Neumann, 1901, pp. 262, 263 (not figured) ; the descrip- tion given by the author agrees in all essentials ; he only refers to the 9 j the description being based on 6 $ probably of French origin, from E. Simon's collection. Neumann, 1906, p. 217 ; describes a more highly chitinized 5 in which he thought he perceived a trace of eyes (specimen in British Museum). Bomiet, 1908, p. 260 ; describes the 9 i" two line.s and states that it probably does not occur in France, being Asiatic ; his Fig! 30, of the ? capitulum, is bad. Blanchard, 1909, p. 148, Fig. 178 ; species merely listed and figure reproduced from Bonnet. Neumann, 1911 a, p. 109, states the species occurs in France. Male (Fig. 309): Scutum 27xl-9 to l-74xl-24 mm.i, fairly glossy, convex, dark, with very many small discrete j^unctations, rather linearly ' The scutums of 10 c? , collected by Brumpt in France, measured in mm. : 2-4 xl-6 2-2 xl-6 2 -38 X 1-7 2-08 X 1-3.5 2-3 xl-6 2-0 X 1-4.5 2-25 X 1-6 2-0 X 1-4 2-23x1-55 1-74x1-24 H. inermis 363 arranged towards the posterior end, and leaving a few non-punctate islands, the largest being median and longitudinal ; no cervical or lateral grooves ; festoons short and ill-defined. Capitulum very small, and departing widely from the form normal to Haeniaphysalis; base rectangular, with rounded angles, broader than long, deeply pitted on its dorsal surface ; palps clavate ; article 1 easily visible dorsally ; articles 2 and 3 not clearly separated, not salient at the base, broadest Fig. 309. //. inermis i (N. 739 d). Dorsum, and more highly magnified detail of capitulum and legs. Specimen found on fox at Surnabad, Transcaucasia, 1903, by Dr E. Dschunkowsky. Original, N.C. del. towards the distal end ; hypostome 2 [ 2. Venter: genital orifice between coxae II ; spiracle very large, elongate, tapering only slightly. Legs fairly long and strong ; all the coxae with a single short pointed spur, internal on coxae I and IV, median on coxae II and III ; trochanter I very large, with broad, blunt dorsal retrograde spur ; tarsus IV swollen in the middle and tapering gradually ; pad short. 364 Greniis Haeniaphysalis Female (Fig. 310) : Scutwn broader than long or the reverse, 1"24 to 0"9 mm. long\ with rather sinuous contour; punctations numerous, uniform, discrete ; cervical grooves far apart, shallow and inconspicuous. Dorsal surface of body closely and finely punctate ; festoons distinct when unfed. Capitulum departing widely, as in the J', from the normal Haemaphysalis form ; the base sub-rectangular but rather salient postero-laterally ; no cornua ; porose areas very large, deep, circular, separated by their diameter, a triangular pit in the posterior part of their interval. Palps as in , long-oval ; cervical grooves normal ; lateral grooves including the first festoon Fig. 330. Haemaphy salts moiitgomeriji 6 ■ Dorsum, right palp (P) in profile, spiracle, anal grooves, coxae with trochanters, tarsus IV. (G. H. F. N. and F.M.H. del.) Nuttall, 1912, Fig. 7. 1 Five (? gave the following measurements in mm. : Scutums Capitulums 2-5 X 1-6 0-4 2-3 X 1-4 0-5 2-3 X 1-4 0-5 2-0 X 1-4 0-5 1-9 X 1-3 0-4 396 Genus Haemai)liy sails and attaining half the body-length ; festoons longer than broad. Gapi- tulura : 0'4 to 0'5 mm. long, base with lateral borders almost straight, converging behind ; corniia pointed, continuous with the crescentic dorsal ridge ; ventral ridge sharp, with trenchant lateral angles ; palps with article 2 protruding slightly, about a third longer than article 3 ; articles 2 and 3, viewed laterally (P in Fig. 330), bear sharp protruding recurved spines ventrally ; hypostome 5 j 5 or 6 | 6, armed nearly to the base with 12 distinct teeth per external file, besides finer denticles and a large corona. Venter : hairy, genital orifice between coxae II ; spiracle large with well-marked postero-dorsal elongation. Legs rela- tively strong ; coxae I-IV with a long, pointed, retrograde spur, longest on coxa I ; trochanters with pointed spurs ; tarsi short, tapering from near the pseudoarticulation, bearing a small distal spur, and, in some specimens, a slight median protuberance ventrally; pads almost as long as the claws. Female (Fig. 331): Scutum 0*9 x 11 mm.^, cordiform, with slight lateral angles, broadly rounded behind ; cervical grooves well-marked, extending slightly beyond half the length ; punctations poorly marked. Fig. 331. Haemaphijtialis montgomeryi ? . Capitulum and scutum, capitulum in ventral aspect, coxae with trochanters, spiracle and tarsus IV. (F. M. H. del.) Nuttall, 1912, Fig, 8. 1 All of the ? were but partly gorged ; they measured roundly 4 mm. in length. H. klnneari 397 uniformly distributed. Capituluin 0 5 iiini. long, resembling that of (/*, but broader, shorter, with cornua less pron(nmced ; porose areas small, oval, far apart, converging in front, placed anteiiorly. Venter : vulva between coxae II; spiracle with dorsal and posterior margins flattened. Legs resembling those of tlie (/, but the spurs on coxae and trochanters less pronounced; tarsi tapering gradually, unarmed. Described from 9 from dog, place not stated, collected III. 1911, by Mr E. R. Hewlett; (Ind. Mus. TM/3, TM/6) $s, from bullock, collected xii. 1911, at Nagercoil ; (N. 3072 = Ind. Mus. 2173/17) ^ $ from Hemitragus hylocrius, Parambikulam, Cochin State, ix. 1914, F. H. Gravely coll. Mysore: (N. 1071 h), ^ ?, from cow. Bangalore, collected i. 1910, by Mr W. H. Marshall. Bombay Presidency : (N. 863), from calves, and (N. 869) from foxhounds, at Belgaum, collected in 1909, by Captain F. H. C. Hutchinson, I.M.S. ; (Ind. Mus. 1117/17) d", found at Gaunter, Panwell, ii. 1911 ; (N. 2529 h), (/ $, from bullocks, collected x. 1913, at Poena by Major Eassie and presented by Colonel E. R. C. Butler ; (Mr Hewlett's coll.) adults from lion, shot 11. HI. 1909, in Gaur Forest, Kathiawar ; (N. 2002) ?, from Felis tigris, Kadra, Kanara, xi. 1910, N, B. Kinnear coll. Ceylon : Dr Aide Castellani, in 1906, sent us four lots (N. 150), from dogs, Nugegoda; (N. 148) from polecat, KoUupitiya ; (N. 151) from Mouse- deer, Cinnamon Gardens ; (N. 152) from pig. Government Model Farm, near Colombo. Colonel B. Skinner, R.A.M.C, in 1906, sent us three lots; (N. 186 a) from country cat, Borlesgama; (N. 187) from dog; (N. 188) from black monkey, Raygam Koili. Mr E. E. Green sent us two lots (N. 510) $s, from dog ; (N. 515 6) $s, from cattle, Matara, vii. 1906. We have a specimen (N. 891) $ , from cattle, presented by Mr E. G. Wheler in 1906. We have determined (E. 876 a = N. 2901, E. 771) adults and nymphs found on the goat, at Hakgala, 23. vii. 1913 and 27. ill. 1914, and (E. 708) on cattle, at Peradeniya, 31. v. 1913, by A. Rutherford. Burma: (N. 1384 a) from goat, Rangoon, collected ix. 1911, by Dr H. H. Marshall. Andaman Islands : (Ind. Mus. 1118/17) ^, from dog, at Ross, collected iii. 1911, by O. Paiva. Federated Malay States : Dr W. M. Scott has sent us (N. 2459) cfs $s, found on fowls, in. 1913, at Singapore. China : We have received through Mr T. V. Sherrin (N. 1372) 1 $, from Nemorhaedus cinereus, Jehang, and (N. 1373) 6 cT 5 $ , from Cervulus sp.. Fen Tuang Shan, An- Wei ; we have, moreover. H. blsplnosa 433 determined numerous specimens (Berlin Mus. No. 179) from Chinese roebuck {II ydropotes inermis), Herr Lemm coll., and (D.E.M. 3, 4, 10 ; N. 2905, 2976) from dog and other (?) hosts, collected at Tsingtau, 7. VIII. 1914, by Prof. Hoffmann. Japan : The late Professor W. Donitz presented us with co-types (N. 129) of his H. neumanni, with shorter spurs. H. calciiH 447 Described from 3 ^ and 1 % (N. 2120 a), taken from huffalo, Sekong River, Sandakan, British North Borneo, 19. iv. 1918, Dr H, F. Conyngham coll. A large species allied to H. montgomeriji Nuttall, 1912, but differing therefrom as follows : basis capituli and scutum broad, fourth coxal spur less developed, venter not hairy, ventral spur of article 2 of (/ palp more divergent, etc. Types in Cambridge. 25. HAEMAPHYSALIS SPINIGERA Neumann, 1897. Figs. ;380-383. Lit. and Icon. : Ncuuiaun, 1897, pp. 3.52-3.54, Fig. 18 (^J pii-lp, digit aud coxae, herein reproduced) ; Neumann, 1901, p. 264 ; Neumann, 1911 a, p. 113, Figs. 59, 60 (condensed from his earlier description ; omits the figure of the digit) ; Blanchard, 1909, p. 157, Fig. 195 (four-line description with figure ; both taken from Neumann). Male (Figs. 380, 381). Scutum oval, about 2*5 x 1-5 mm., broader posteriorly, finely punctate all over ; cervical grooves shallow, parallel ; Fig. 380. H. spinigera i . Capitulnm in dorsal and ventral aspects. Drawn from a balsam-mounted type specimen taken from a bear. Only the surface structures are shown. Original, G. H. F. N. del. lateral grooves short, very concave internally, including no festoon ; festoons long. Capitulum. : base rectangular, finely punctate dorsally, cornua strong ; palps short, article 2 fairly salient laterally, with a retrograde spine at the ventro-lateral angle ; article 3 much broader than long, with a short stout ventral tooth; hypostome 5 | 5, 9 or 10 teeth per file. Venter: spiracle oval, with slight dorsal process. Legs : relatively stout ; coxa I with a long mternal spur; short spurs at the middle of the posterior border of coxae II and III, a very long internal spur on coxa IV ; tarsi tapering, pad long. 29—2 448 Genus Haemaphysalis Fig. 381. H. spinigera g : (1) left digit, x 320 ; (2) left palp in ventral aspect, x 65 ; (3) coxae, x45. Drawings from the type. Neumann, 1897, Fig. 18. Female (Figs. 382, 383). Scutum sub-circular, 1-2 x 1-1 mm., with very fine punctations irregularly distributed ; cervical grooves faint. o Fig. 382. Fig. 383. H. spinigera, ? . Fig. 382. Capitulum and scutum, capitulum in ventral aspect, tarsus IV. Drawn from one of our specimens (N. 1998). Original, N. C. del. Fig. 383. Coxae of right side and spiracle. Drawn from a type specimen mounted in balsam. The tick was found on an Indian bullock. Original, G. H.F. N. del. H. spiiiigera 449 sub-parallel. Capitulum : base rectangular, much broader than long ; porose areas oval, for apart, a small median pit in the interval ; cornua fairly strong; palps relatively longer than in the c/, but with the same characteristics; hypostome 4 1 4. Venter : spiracle sub-rectangular, dorsal process almost absent. Legs : coxa I with a fairly strong internal spine ; a very small spur on coxae II-IV ; tarsi tapering, pad long. Our description is based on specimens (N. 1998, cf ? ) found on Felis tigris, at Kadra, Kanara, India, xi. 1910, by N. B. Kinnear. and on others (N. 2388 5 ) 2 ,, 0-9 xO-9 1-81 xl-24 ,, >■> ,, 0-87 xO-9 1-8 xl-18 ,, ,, ,, 0-87 xO-9 {Footnote continued overleaf) 450 Genus Haema/physalis Fig. 384. H. spinigera var. novae-guineae i . Dorsum and venter, spiracle and tarsus IV. • (N. 2673.) Original, N. C. del. 3 of the palps is almost unbroken ; the lateral salience of article 2 is longer and more retrograde in direction ; there is a slight but distinct dorsal spine in the middle of the posterior border of article 2. Legs : the spurs on coxae I-III are very short and blunt ; whereas in the type there is a long spur on coxa I and well-marked spurs, longer than broad, on coxae II and III. The long needle-like spur on coxa IV is present in both forms. Female (Fig. 385). Scutum: ranges in size from 1"1 x 0*9 to 0'78 X 0'91 mm.^ Capitulum like that of the ^T, and presenting similar differences from that of the type. Legs : spur on coxa I slight. Nymph (Fig. 386). Scutum about 0-52 x 0*54 mm.-, sub-circular, with a few faint punctations and well-marked sub-parallel cervical grooves. Capitulum with the characteristics of the % less pronounced ; 1-7 xl-14 1-7 xl-08 1-68 X 1-15 1-66 X 1-05 Specimens from Queensland. 0-85 X 0-95 0-85 X 0-92 0-84 X 0-95 0-8 xO-95 0-8 xO-9 0-78 x 0-91 Specimens from Queensland. 1 See note 2, p. 449. '^ The scutums of 5 nymphs measured as follows in mm. : 0-54 X 0-54 0-48 x 0-53 0-52 X 0-54 0-44 x 0-53 0-51 X 0-55 H. spinigera var. novae-guinecie 451 Fig. 385. H. spinigera var. novae-guineae ? . Scutum, capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects, coxae with trochanters, spiracle and tarsus IV. (N. 2673,) Original, N. C. del. Fig. 386. H. spinigera var. novae-guineae, nymph. Dorsum and venter, spiracle and tarsus IV. (N. 2673.) Original, N. C. del. comua distinct ; hypostome 4 4. Spiracle circular. Legs as in the $. Described from ^ ^,1 % and os (N. 2673), from bandicoot, Manus, Admiralty Islands, German New Guinea, 20. ix. 1913, A. F. Eichhom coll. We have since determined (Sweet No. 463 = N. 2832) 9 ^ and 13 ? from kangaroo, Northern Territory, Queensland, Australia : and 452 Genus Haemaphy salts (N. 3011 = Berlin Mus. No. 185) many cT ? o and L from Perameles dorevanus, Astrolahe Bay, German New Guinea. After this description was written and the figures completed, we were able to examine speci- mens of H. novae-guineae Hirst ( All comprised in one lot of typical specimens. (Berlin 22 h) from G. E. Africa N. 496 c from Java N. 954 (I from Borneo N. 1060 c from Paining Ind. Mus. 5994/10 from Bengal N. 1225 Abyssinia \ Typical Specimens. 2-4 xl-3"! 2-4 xl-5h 2-45 X 1-5 j 1-5 xO-8 1-4 x0-8i l-35xO-9J Three specimens of 11. koningsbergeri type. //. leachi var. indica type. A small form. H. leachi 463 Fig. 400. Fig. 401. Fig. 400. H. leachi 0-8 xO-75 )> 1-33 X 0-93 (N. 221) 0-76x0-ft ,, 1-3 X 1-0 31—2 480 Genus Haeinaphysalis Fig. 416. Fig. 417. Fig. 416. H. welUngtoni g , dorsum and venter. Fig. 417. H. loellingtoni ? , dorsum. Nuttall and Warbiirton xii. 1907, Fig. %, A, B and C. G. H.F.N, and E.W. del. Fig. 418. H. welUngtoni ?. H. hypostome, 250 ytt 1. D. digit 100 ;t 1. Nuttall and Warburton, xu. 1907, Figs. 10, 11. G. H. F. N. del. Fig. 419. H. welUngtoni nymph. Capitulum in dorsal and ventral aspects, scutum, coxae with trochanters, spiracle and tarsus IV. (N. 1057 from Selangor.) Original, N. C. del. H. loellmgtoni 481 very large (0"G mm. I.), with characteristics of Sa7)ibu7' deer, Bode River, Sandakan Bay, iv. 1913 ; (N. 2119 b) tribntion and Hosts 509 AFRICA [cont.) Countries where the sjjeeies occur ASIA numidiana Algeria obtusa Island of Eeunion parmata Uganda, British East Africa, Congo Free State, Gold Coast, Sierra Leone, Cameroon silacea Cape Colony simplex Madagascar spinulosa Uganda A aburcnsis India (Abor Country) aculeata Ceylon, India birmaniae Burma bispinosa India (widely distributed). bispinosa var. inter- media calvus campanulata cinnabarina var. punctata Burma, Assam, Ceylon, Andaman Islands, Malaya, China, Jaj^an, Borneo India (widely distributed), Ceylcjn British North Borneo India, China, Japan Asia Minor, Transcaucasia (? Japan, doubtful, see text p. 387) (mole-rat), Avicanthus jyvmillis (os.), Anonuilurus orientalis (squirrel), Lepus sp., Erinaceus albiventris, Erinaceus sp. Birds: Drijoscopns turalii and nightingale Beptiles: Itonyx capensis, Testudo sp. (os.) Erinaceus sp. unknown I'olaiiioclioerus porcus, Ovis arics, Capra hircus, Bos taurus, antelope, bushbuck, hartebeeste, Canis familiar is Bos tawus Ericulus setosm, Erinaceus sp. unknown unknown Tra(julus nwiiunina Cervulus muntjac, Atlierura iiuicrura Mammals: Canis jamiliaris, jackal, Felis tigris, F. domesticus, Vivcr- ricula mulaccensis, Bos bubalis, B. taurus, Hemitraijus hylocrius, Nemorhaedus cinereus, Ovis aries, Capra hircus, Eqnus caballus, Sus scrofa, Cervulus sp., Cervus sp., mouse deer, Hijdropotes in- ermis, Macacus sp., Talpa sp. Birds: Gallus domesticus iS'^aramals: Felis caracal, F.ornata, F. domesticus, F. ajinis, Caitis pallipes, C. vulpes, Cyon [Cuon) dukhunensis. Hyaena hyaena. Bos taurus, 5ws cristatus, Erinaceus micropus, Lepus ruficaudatus, Mil- lardia meltada Bos bubalis Bos taurus, Equus caballus, Cervus sp., Canis familiaris, Mus sp. Bos taurus, Ocis aries, Capra hircus, Flquus caballus, Canis vulpes, Ursus sp. , Lepus sp. 33 510 Genus Haemaphysalis ASIA {cont.) corniijera cornujera var. ano- mala Countries wliere the species occur India, Federated Malay States, Singapore, Bor- neo, Sumatra, Judea India cuitpidata Ceylon dentipalpis Federated Malay States doenitzi Singapore fiava Japan, India formosensis Formosa, Burma howlctti India hy.stricts Burma, Assam, Cey China, Federated Malay States, Sumatra, Borneo, Formosa inermis Transcaucasia (? Japan) inermis var. aponom- India, Japan vioides japonica Japan, China japonica var. doag- China lasi kinneari India leachi Transcaucasia, India, matra, Java, Borneo, Federated Malay States montgomeryi India Hosts Cervus aristotelis, Bos bubalis, Felis tigi-is, wild pig Cants liq)us Tragulus memmina, Pnradoxuriis nigcr, Herpestes mungo Fclis chaus water-hen Cants familiaris, Siis cristatus, Bos taurus, Ovis aries, Eqiius caballus Canisfantiliaris, Hystrix hengalensis or Ursits torqnatus Eqntis caballus Mammals : Hystrix bengalensis, Erinaceus sp., Ursits torquatus, U. malayamis, Felis tigris, Ganis familiaris, Sus scrofa, S. celeben- sis Reptiles : Geoemyda sjnnosa Bos tauriis, Naemorhaediis crispus, Canis sp. (fox) Bibos sp. (Himalayan zebu), Eqttus caballus Naemorhaedus crisjnis, roebuck roebuck Felis tigris Mammals (chiefly Carnivora) : Ursus sp., U. malayamis, Felis affinis, F. bengalensis, F. chaus, F. ne- bulosa, F. tigris, F. caracal, F. pardus, Viverra zibetha, Viverra sp., Canis aureus, C. indicus, C. familiaris, Cyon (Cuon) dukhu- nensis, Paradoxuriis sp., Herpestes mitngo, Centrococcyx intermedins, Millardia meltada Reptiles (Testudiniae) : Nicoria tri- juga, Testudo elongata Equus caballus, Bos taurus, Ovis aries, Canis familiaris I ^ Geographical Distrlbulioit and Hosts 511 ASIA (cunt.) papuaiia Countries where the 8i)euie8 occ in- New Guinea, Borneo, Java, Sumatra, Federated Ma- lay States parva Ceylon, India spiiiiijera India. Ceyluii, Judca spinigeni var. mivtu'- German Now Guinea, gitineae Queensland Uirturis Ceylon vidua Federated Malay Status icarburloiii China, Western Siberia, Formosa well'uKjtoni Borneo, Sumatra, Federated Malay States, Siani, Anda- man Islands AUSTRALASIA bancrofti Queensland bispinosa New South Wales humerosa Australia leachi New South Wales AMERICA cinnabariua United States, Canada kochi leporis-palustris Brazil United States, Canada, Mexico, Panama, Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina Hosts Gania fdmiliarin, Uraus mahiyanns, Felis thjris, F, pardtis, Sux sp. Felis viverrina, F. pardus, Lepns I'uficaudatus, Lepus sp. Felis tigrh, F. pdrdus, Uisus sp. , bullock Kangeroo sp., I'cramclvn sp., Hydro- mys sp. Turtur suratemis Paradi)xiinis sp. Nemorhaedus (Serow goat). Bos tauriis Mammals : Canis familiaris. Bos bubalis, but oftener from Birds: fowl, goose, turkey Macropus dorsalis, M. yiyanteus, Bettonyia penicillata Equus caballiis, Bos taurus Ferameles iiuicrttra, P. nasuta Equus caballus Birds (chieHy) : Cliordeilis popetiie, turkey, meadow lark, jackdaw, red-winged blackbird, marsh- hawk, quail, ruffed grouse (in the United States) Mammals: Bos taunts, Man (in Canada) Cervus campestris, C. ntfus Mammals (chiefly Leporidae) : Lepus americanus, L. auduboni, L. bairdi, L. braziliensis, L. dalli, L. jyalus- tris, Dasyprocta agouti, Eqttus caballus, Felis domesticus, pine squirrel Birds: robin, quail, meadow lark, chaparal cock. Brewer's blackbird, thrush, jackdaw, blue jay, magpie, Penelope obscura (in the United States) 33—2 512 Genus Haemaphy sails LIST OP CONDEMNED AND DOUBTFUL SPECIES OF HAEMAPHYSALIS INCLUDING THEIR SYNONYMY AND LITERATURE The .species are ordered according to the genera to which they have at various times been referred. The list of good species will he found on p. 548. See also further particulars under the Synonymy of Hae ma ph// salts on p. 349. Haemaphysalis Koch, 1844. afrimna C. W. Howard, viil. 1909, repr. PL XXXIV = //. hoodi Warburton and Nuttall, vi. 1909, p. 62. amhigua Neumann, 1901, p. 262 ; 1906, p. 217 ; 1911 o, p. 109 ; Bonnet, 1908, p. 260, Fig. 30 ; Blanchard, 1909, p. 148, Fig. 178 (from Bonnet) = ^. inennis Birula, 1895, p. 360. asiatica (Supino, 1897) Neumann, 1897, p. '357 = 11. leachi (Audouin, 1827). See further under Opisthodon asiaticus. Listed as a valid species by Blanchard, 1909, p. 148, and as a doubtful species by Neumann, 1911 a, p. 115. " birmaniae Supino, 1897 " in Neumann, 1911 a, p. 109 = ir. bispinosa Neumann, 1897. "bispinosa Neumann" in Neumann, 1901, p. 261 = 11. hystricis Supino, 1897. caHes^/'iMU (Supino, 1897) Neumann, 1897, p. 'ibl = H. leachi (Audouin, 1827) Neumann, 1897 ; Blanchard, 1909, p. 148, lists it as a valid species ; Neumann, 1911 a, p. 115, lists it as a doubtful species. chordeilis (Packard, 1869) = //^, dnnabarina Koch, 1844. '■'■ chordeilis Banks, 1908" in Blanchard, 1909, p. 148 = i/. cinnahanna Koch, 1844. '■'■chordeilis Packard" in Hunter and Bishopp, 1911, p. 229 (and subsequent American authors) =Zr. dnnabarina Koch, 1844. ^'' cinnaberina" Koch, 1847, p. 123=^. dnnabarina Koch, 1844, p. 237. "cocdnea" mentioned casually by Bonnet, 1906c, p. 544, doubtless meant for IT. condnna Koch, 1844. '■'• condnna condnna Koch" in Neumann, 1911 «, p. 110, a sub-species = i:f. concinna Koch, 1844. condnna kochi (Neumann) Neumann, 1911 «, p. Ill, a sub-species = if. con- dnna Koch, 1844, and other (doubtful) species. concinna. var. kochi Neumann, 1905, p. 239 = ff. condnna Koch, 1844, and other (doubtful) species. condnna longicornis (Neumami) Neumann, 1911 «,}). Ill, a sub-species ; described as H. longicornis Neumann, 1901, p. 261, Fig. 2 (reproduced) from 2 $ fomid on cattle, at Kempsey, N. S. Wales, mounted as microscopic speci- mens ; degraded to a variety of H. condnna Koch, 1844 (//. concinna var. Condemned Species 513 longicornis (Neumatui)) by Neumann, 1905, j). 237, and finally raised by that author to a sub-speuies. It is in our opinion impossible to determine the species to which the tick belongs on the evidence of mounted speci- mens, at any rate without other confirmatory evidence. H. mncinna 9 is scarcely to be identified in the absence of the characteristic ^, and a purported 9 > coming from a remote country whence the ^ has not been derived, is open to grave suspicion. Wa re[)roduce Neumann's figure for what it is worth. Fig. 448. H. iDiigicoriiis Neumann, 1901, Fip. 2. ? (P) palp in ventral aspect, (//) coxa I. JI. longicornis Neumann is listed by Rainbow, 1906, p. 165, as an Aus- tralian species on Neumann's authority. Blanchard, 1909, p. 148, Fig. 184, who reproduces Neumann's figure, inchides this tick in the synonymy of H. concinna Koch. We prefer to regard it as a doul)tful species. concinna var. longicornis (Neumann) Neumann, 1905, p. 237 ; ride supra. crassa Warburton, 1908, p. 516 ; listed as a valid species by Blanchard, 1909, p. 150 = ^. cinnaharina var. punctata (Can. and Fan.). cnscobia (Canestrini, 1897) Neumann, 1897, p. 356 = merely a nominal species. See further under Opisthodon cuscolmcs. Listed as a valid species by Blanchard, 1909, p. 150, and as a doubtful species by Neumaim, 1911 a, p. 115. erinacei Pavesi, 1884, p. 484 ; merely a nominal species, the description being insufticient. We quote from the original all that might serve for its identification : ^Ualc : 3 x 2 mm., finely j^unctate, cervical grooves divergent, lateral grooves present, sexual orifice facing coxae II, coxae imarmed. Female: scutum 1 mm. long, broadening and rounded behind, anterior borders parallel. — Found by Marquis Doria on Erinaceus algirus at Gebel Resas, Tunisia, in 1881. Pavesi consid(>rs the tick allied to H. 514 Genus Haemaphu sails concinna ; it may be identical with this species as Neumann states (1897, p. 331). Neumann, 1909, p. 151, and 1911 (/, p. 116, lists the species as doubtful. flava as listed by Neumann since 1897, p. 333 = a confusion of species which may have included H. flava Nn., H. campanulata Warburton, and //. japonica Warburton, q.v. flava armata (Neumann) Neumann, 1911 «, p. 112, a sub-species = Zr. ^aya Neumann, 1897, p. 333. flMva var. armata Neumann, 1905, p. ^2'il = H. flava Neumann, 1897, p. 333. flava flava (Neumann) Neumann, 1911 «, p. 112, a sub-species = iT. japonim Warburton, 1908. gestroi (Supino, 1897) Neumann, 1897, p. Zbl = H. leachi (Audouin, 1827). Neumann, 1902, p. 128, regarded the species as allied to H. leachi; Blanehard, 1909, p. 151, lists it as valid ; Neumann, 1911a, p. 115, lists it as a doubtful species. hirudo L. Koch, 1877 a, p. 786, not figured. Undeterminable from the author's description ; he may have been dealing with a HaemaphysalU ; a $ from Japan. Neumann, 1897, p. 341, at first referred specimens of his own to Koch's species because they also came from Japan, but afterwards renamed them H. concinna var. kochi Neumann, 1905, p. 239, realizing that in the absence of the type, the species hirudo was purely nominal. We fully agree with Neumann with regard to the foregoing but do not recognize his var. hochi as valid (see text p. 456). H. hirudo is listed as a doubtful species by Blanehard, 1909, p. 151, and by Neumann, 1911 a, p. 116. " hystricis Supino " in Neumann, 1902 a, p. 128, and 1911 «, p. 109 = //. bispinosa Neumann, 1897, p. 341. japonnica Warburton, 1908, p. 512. Name misspelt; should read H. japonica. lagotis (Gervais) of Neumann, 1901, p. 265 = merely a nominal species, for Ixodes lagotis Gervais, 1849, whilst it may have been a Uaemaphysalis, was too poorly described to make this certain. Listed as a nominal species of Haemaphysalis by Blanehard, 1909, p. 152, and as a doubtful species by Nevunann, 1911a, p. 116. leachi australis (Neumann) Neumann, 1911 a, p. 115, a sub-species = ^. leachi (Audouin, 1827). leachi var. australis Neumann, 1905, p. 238 = //. leachi (Audouin, 1827). leachi leachi Neumann, 1911a, p. 114, a sub-species = /T. leachi (Audouin, 1827). " leporis Packard " in Rohr, 1909, pp. 144-146 (quotes Neumann's description) = if. leporis-palustris (Packard, 1869). "•leporis (Packard)" in Nemnann, 1897, p. 343; 1901, p. 262 and 1911 a, p. Ill = H. leporis-palustris (Packard, 1869). leporis var. proxima Aragao, 1911, p. 167, PL XI, Figs. 4, 5 {^) = H. leporis- palustris (Packard, 1869). '•'■leporis-palustris Packard "in Hunter and Bishopp, 1911, p. 228 = //^. leporis- palustris (Packard, 1869). longicornis Neumann, 1901, p. 261 ; a doubtful species, see discussion above under H. concinna longicornis (Neumann). Condemned SjJecles 515 longipalpis Warburtoii, xir. 1910, p. 399=//. anuleata Lavarra, 1905, p. 255. marmorata Berlese, 1887, Fasc. 47, No. 4, PI. II {$) = Dermacentor reticulatus (Fabricius, 1794). micropla C'anestrini, 1887, p. 104, IM. IX, Figs. 3, 5; also in Berle.se, 1888 = Rhipicephalua microplus (Canestrini) Canostriiii, 1890, \>. ^^9^ = Boop/dlus annulutus var. microplus according to Neuiuauu, 1901, p. 280. Tieumanni Donitz, 1905, pp. 127-129, Figs. 4-6 = //. 6ispino«« Neumann, 1897, p. 341. neumanni Douitz in Blanchard, 1909, \t. 154 (merely listed); in Neumann, 1911«, p. 109; I in Yakiraoff and Kohl-Yakimoft; 1911, p. 418 = /r. hispinosa Neumann, 1897, p. 341. '"'■ peregrina Cambridge," listed as a doubtful sjieciesby Neumann, 1911 (/, p. 116. See under peregrinus. '■^ per egr huts Cambridge " in Neumann, 1897, p. 327 ; see below. peregrinus O. Pickard-Caml)ridge, 1889, p. 406, 2 figures. Description and figures useless ; purely a nominal species. The author informed us that the types are lost. Included by Neumaiui, 1897, p. 327, in the .synonymy oi H. punctata { = cinnabarina vav. pimet'it. 417 (footnote) = /T. cuscobia (Cane- strini) in Blanchard, 1909, p. 150. See above under Opisthodon the generic name which the author found was preoccupied and for which he substituted Prosopodon. Rhipicephalus Koch, 1844. ellipticus Koch, 1847, p. 135, PL XXX, Fig. 111. Species based on one 9 from the Cape of Good Hope. Judging from the description and figure, we may safely conclude that the tick was H. leachi {A.\\do\\n\, 1827); we agree in this with Neumann. See also under Rhipistoma. expositicins L. Koch, 1877 6, p. 196 = most probably E. ciimabarina var. punctata (Can. and Fan.), judging from the description. Rhipistoma Koch, 1844 (misspelt " Rhipidostoma " by Karsch, 1878, and Dugfes, 1888, and " Rhiphistoma" by Osborn, 1896). ellipticum Koch, 1844, p. 23d = Rhipicephalus ellipticus Koch, 1847, p. 135 (.see above) = Zr. leachi (Audouin, 1827). leachii in Koch, 1844, p. 239 (cites Savigny), and in Karsch, 1878, p. 337 = //. leachi (Audouin, 1827). The type of the genus Rhipistoma. leporis in Osborn, 1896, p. 261=^. leporis-palustris (Packard, 1869). 518 Genus Haemaplufsalis NOTES ON THE BIOLOGY OF HAEMAPHYSALIS By G. H. F. NUTTALL. Referring to the list of 50 species and varieties enumerated in the table at the end of this fasciculus, the table serving likewise as an index, the reader will find that the various stages of each species and variety known to science give the following figures : The cT $ o Z are known in 14 species and varieties. cf ? O „ „ „ 4 c/ O c/ only 18 1 8 5 It follows that these species and varieties are known by 45 5 „ 7 ,, 8 „ 9-10 3 8. vni> 1905 16^0. 30 477 142 6fi 40 15 ,, -4 ,, 5-6 ,, 7 ,, 8-9 ,, 10 „ 11 4 ,, 17. XI. 1905 10^ c. 10 ,, 21 — 5 " ■28. XI. 1905 12° C. 21 30 18 ,, 13 ,, 1-5 ,, 16 — 6 >» 19. XII. 1905 12° C. •2 7 5 ,, 7 ,, 8-13 ,, 14-19 7 Rabbit 2. VI. 1905 17° 0. 3 5 4 „ 13 ,, 14 „ 15 ~ 8 " 6. VI. 1905 17° C. 116 119 30 ,, 7 8 ,, 9 — 91 Sheep 27. VI. 1914 17° C. 60 90 33 5 „ 7 ,, 8 „ 9 Nymphs 1 Hedgehog 29. VII. 1905 20° C. 152 by day 12 — 2 >5 3. XII. 1905 12° C. 33 „ 25-27 — 3 " 19. XII. 1905 12° C. 4 on 1 1 day 13 „ H „ 20 (34 lost). 4 >> 22. I. 1906 8°C. 1 1 „ 32 ,, 33 (22 lost). 5 >> 17. III. 1901) 11° C. 7 11 4 4 8 11 „ 11 „ 12 M l:^ „ 14-17 „ 18-20 „ 21-29 (5 lost). ' Added to previously published record. 522 Genus Haetitaphu sails No. of Lot Host Date when put on host Host main tained at a temp, of Number of gorged ticks collected on succeeding days Remarks Nymphs. 6 Hedgehog 11. IV. 1906 12° C. 7 on day 9 (33 lost). 7 14. V. 1006 13° C. 3 10 4 „ 7 „ 8 „ 9 (13 lost). Adults ( ? ). 1 Hedgehog 9-11. IX. 1905 12° C. 1 „ 14 Put on with 1 „ 17 males, none 3 „ 18 lost. Conclusions from the foregoing protocol regarding the time H. cin- naharina var. punctata remains upon the host: Larvae placed upon a hedgehog in June-August, the host being maintained at 16-17° C, remain 3-11 days upon the host, the majority dropping off gorged after 4-7 days. In November-December, the temperature being 10-12° C, they remain upon the host 7-21 days, the majority dropping off gorged after 13-21 days. When placed on rabbits and sheep in June, at 17° C. they drop off gorged after 6-15 days. Nymphs, placed on hedgehogs at 20"^ C, all dropped off by day 12; at 11-13° C. they dropped off after 7-29 days; at 8° C. after 32-33 days. Adults ( $ ) remained upon the hedgehog at 12° C. for 14-18 days. Note: — Stockman (1911), who raised H. cinnaharina var. punctata on cattle and sheep, records that. Remain on host Average period Larvae 4—12 days 5 — 9 days Nymphs 4—17 4—13 Adults 6—30 9—22 The time required by H. cinnabarina var. punctata for metamorphosis. In the protocols dealing with this section I include those of Stockman with my own : Egg to Larva Observer No. Date when first eggs were laid Time required for meta- Date when first morphosis larvae appeared (days) Tempera ture Nuttall 1 4. IV. 1905 25. VI. 1905 82 14° C. Stockman 16/3 20. V. 1907 2. VIII. 1907 74 — „ — — — 38 — Remarks The shortest time observed. Biolofjii of II. cinnabar ilia var. punctata 523 Larva to Nymph. Nuttall Stockman No. 1 2 32 33 Nymph to Adult. Date when larvae gorged on host '20. XII. lyor, 1. I. 190() 30. VII. 1907 .30. VIII. 1907 30. VIII. 1907 Time reiiuired for nieta- Oate w)icn nH)rphosi.s 'J'enipera- nymphs emerged 8. V. 2. VI. 15. in. 29. IV. 30. IV. lOOC) 1900 1908 1908 1908 ( 2 12. VII. 1914 12. IX. 1914 02 Stockman 30 20. X. 1907 11. III. 1908 142 )) 27 29. IX. 1907 30. III. 1908 182 „ 53 10. X. 1907 1. V. 190H 197 \ ,, 32 12. X. 1907 30. IV. 1908 200 ,, 21 12. IX. 1907 3. IV. 1908 203 )> 29 20. IX. 1907 30. V. 1908 252 Remarks This being the maximum period in 1 out of 9 lots. Remarks At 10° C. Most of the lot were dead. At ca. 10° C; all iu 90 days'. Hibernated at outside temperature. Ditto, and after starving 182 days raised to adults. Hibernated at outside temperature. ^ Record since added. 524 Genus Haemaphy salts Adults. Observer No. Date of emergence Date to which adults survived Longevity unfed (days) Remarks Nuttall .1 13. I. 1906 — 255 At 12° C. Lived longer, death not noted. ,, 2 18. IV. 1906 — 160 ,, „ ,, Stockman 16/4 6. IX. 1906 18. IV. 1907 224 At outside temp., feeble when state recorded. Oviposition. The manner in which the female H. cinnaharina var. punctata lays her eggs was illustrated by me in the Harben Lectures 1908, p. 398, but I kept no records of the time it takes for the tick to oviposit and did not count the number of eggs laid by single females. Judging from memory a female would lay 3000-5000. When the opportunity arises I shall have enumerations made. Apart from this the only other observations recorded are those of Stockman which are likewise incom- plete. He states that the shortest and longest times which elapsed before oviposition commenced were 10 and 211 days respectively, the female usually ovipositing 24-29 days after abandoning the host. Some gorged females (Lot 27) survived 216 days without ovipositing. He gives no temperature records in his protocols; the only records with dates are the following: stockman No. 16/3 16/4 Female dropped from host 12. XI. 1906 12. X. 1906 Eggs first laid on 20. V. 1907 15. II. 1907 Oviposition commenced after 189 days 124 „ Stockman does not state how long oviposition lasts, but he says that the process may be interrupted with the onset of cold weather and resumed when the weather is warm. The following description of the process of oviposition in H. cinna- harina var. imnctata is quoted from Nuttall (vii. 1908, p. 398): "In the accompanying figure (Fig. 450) I have illustrated the successive stages I have observed in the process of oviposition in Haemaphysalis. Prior to oviposition the capitulum is retracted so that it lies in a depression beneath the scutum, the vulva approaching the capitu- lum. When about to oviposit, a remarkable organ (which I named ' Gene's organ,' after its discoverer) is protruded between the scutum and capitulum. The organ appears in the form of two vesicles containing hyaline secretion, the vesicles being protruded and retracted rhythmically whilst being completely extruded. When Gene's organ 2P j2 d 3 '$ !z; o r=) CO 1 34 526 Genus Haeinaphysalis appears, the capitulum is depressed (Fig. 450 at 2) and the vuh^a is arched upwards. The eapituhim next disappears in the depth of the pit, and the ovipositor protrudes from the vulva through being evaginated (8). The two halves or vesicles of Gene's organ grow in size and show two glove-finger-like processes (4-8). The ovipositor grows in length, forcing apart the vesicles (5), and the e^g appears (6) and is protruded (7), after which the ovipositor is quickly retracted (8), the egg being left between the vesicles and the capitulurn reappearing beneath. Next (9), the vesicles begin to collapse and disappear (10), leaving the egg resting upon the back of the capitulum, which presently is tossed backward (11), so as to ' shovel ' the egg upward and backward upon the scutum. The capitulum is then slowly depressed (12), and Gene's organ reappears prior to the laying of another egg. It takes two to four minutes to lay an egg, the intervals between ovipositions varying somewhat in length. This process is repeated for each egg, and entails a good deal of labour." In Fig. 449 the position of Gene's organ (" ovipositing gland ") is shown in a schematized longitudinal section through the capitulum of the female. Summary. Haemapliysalis cinnaharina var. punctata seeks a host three times, feeding thereon in the larval, nymphal and adult stages. It readily attaches itself to the host 4-12 days after each ecdysis and is easily reared under experimental conditions upon hedgehogs, rabbits, sheep, cattle and ferrets. The larvae usually remain upon the host 4-7 days, although they may remain attached anywhere from 3 to 19 days. The nymphs usually remain attached for about a week, but this period of attachment may range from 4 to 33 days. Adult females remain attached for 6 to 22 days, the longer stay upon the host is doubtless due to their waiting to be fertilized. Males and females both behave like those of H. leachi, q.v. My observations suggest that when a hedgehog (hibernating host) is maintained a t'a low temperature, the larvae and nymphs remain somewhat longer upon the host than in warm weather. The time required for metamorphosis is governed by temperature, being much prolonged by cold. The larvae may hatch from the egg after 38 days (Stockman's shortest time) to 82 days (at 14° C, Nuttall); the nymphs may emerge after 14 days (Stockman's mininum) to 159 days (at 10" C, Nuttall) or after as long a period as 243 days (Stockman's maximum); the adults emerge after 7 to 229 B'wloijij of H. cinnubarma var. pamtata 527 Fig. 4/)0. Illustrating the mechanism of oviposition observed in H. cinnabarina var. punctata. For description see text. (13) is a schematic sketch. Drawn from living specimens so as to show the different stages of the process in sequence. (Nuttall, 1908, p. 399.) 34—2 528 Greiius HaeniapJnjsalis days (Stuckman's iiiiiiimum and maximum); my observations show a range of 17 days (at 30" C.) to 107 days (at 9° C). The longevity of the unfed tick is very marked; the records of Stockman and the writer show that larvae may survive for 803 days, nymphs for 252 days, adults 255 days; all stages are therefore able to hibernate readily in this condition. The time which elapses between the dropping of the gorged female from the host and the commencement of oviposition is markedly influenced by temperature, ranging accordingly from 10 to 211 days (Stockman). Data are lacking as to the duration of oviposition and the number of eggs laid by single females. In nature, the tick will probably be able to complete its life cycle in a year but it may well run into two years in our climate. Taking average figures from the data recorded above, the cycle may be completed in 125 da3's, but the developmental period may of course be much prolonged : Time required in days From the time egg is laid to emergence of larva ... 38 Larva hardens ... ... ... ... 7 Larva stays on host ... ... ... ... 6 Metamorphosis: Larva to Nymph ... ... 14 Nymph hardens ... ... ... ... 7 Nymph stays on host ... ,.. ... ... 7 Metamorphosis: Nymph to Adult ... ... 15 Adult hardens ... ... ... ... 7 Adult (?) stays on host ... ... ... 14 Gorged ? after dropping off host, begins to lay after ... 10 125 days Haemaphysalis cinnabarina. This tick requires three hosts upon which to feed as a larva, nymph and adult. The first to raise the tick were Hooker, Bishopp and Wood (1912, p. 98), who state that the larvae feed 5-12 days on rabbits or guinea-pigs; they twice failed to feed on fowls. Metamorphosis from larva to nymph takes 14 days at 79° F. or 76 days at 54° F. Some unfed nymphs lived up to 55-75 days. Nymphs, placed on cattle, fed for 5-8 days, and then underwent metamorphosis to adults in 26 days at 68° F., or in 186 days at 60° F. (average temperature). Adults survived unfed for 100-305 days. A female (probably unfertilized) remained for 19 days upon an ox; she then dropped off replete and survived for 172 days, but did not oviposit. The following observations were made by me in Cambridge with the Jiiitlotjl/ of II. riiniahariiKi ;")'JU progeny of 2 $ (N. 2452) taken from (■(((tie in Winnipc^g, Ciuijulu, and for which I am indebted to Mr .J. \i. N. Harrison. 'V\\v. ticks were raised on rabbits in exj)eriniental (;ag(!s at loom tempei-ature (al)out 15" C.) in the la])oi'atory. "^I'he ticks were kipl in an incnb;itoi- at. 30" C. during nu'taniorjihosis. The recently emer-ged larvae were placed on a rabbit mi 27. .\1. 1918: No. of gorged larvae collected on HUcce. 270 ,, (; 5(50 7 306 .» '^ 160 ,, '.) 98 10 Til 11 1.5 „ 12 1-2 i;5 The first nymplis emerged on 11. XII. I!)l'i, i.e., nietanKJiphosis from larva to nymph lasted 10-1 1 days at 80' C. (HO F.). On 0. i. 1914 the ii\in])lis (100) were placed on a rabbit: -Ni). of «or«e(l iiyini>liH collettti-rl on succeKsive days 'A oil (lay H •t ., '.< •A „ 11 r, ,, 12 1 „ i:j 2 „ 14 'A „ 15 2 ,, 17 The first adults emerged on 10. II. 1914, i c., metamorj)hosis from nymph to adult lasted 2S days at 80 ' ( ■. My residts accord witJi those of the American aiitjiois, but, the nymphs I'cmaiiK'd longer u[jon the host. Longevity of unfed ticks. /j((rv(ie which emerged 7. XI. i!)l8, died after 48 days. Ni/mphs which emerged 1 1. xii. 1918, died aftei- 84 days (at rootn temperature). 530 Genus Haemaphysalls Haemaphysalis leporis-palustris. ~ The life-history of this species has been studied experimentally by Hunter and Hooker (1907, pp. 53-54), Hooker (1908, pp. 47-48), Rohr (1909, pp. 100-110), Hunter and Bishopp (1911, pp. 228-229), Hooker, Bishopp and Wood (1912, pp. 90-96), and Hadwen (1912, pp. 97-98). Rohr's observations were made in Brazil, his " Haemaphysalis proxima " having been found on wild rabbits and agouti; Hadwen studied the species in Canada, specimens having been collected in Manitoba and British Columbia from Lepiis americanus; the remaining authors' investigations were carried out in Dallas, Texas. In the following pages I have sought to arrange the data supplied by these authors so as to present them in a uniform manner. A summary will be found at the end of the section. Time the tick remains upon the host. Larvae: drop off gorged beginning on the 5th day according to Hooker (in October in Texas; host not stated). Rohr found that they remain 6-11 days on the rabbit, he records an experiment in Brazil, as follows: 6th day 10 lar vae di opped oft 7 , 139 8 , lul 9 , 00 10 24 11 •5 12 0 no more collected Total 389 Hooker, Bishopp and Wood give two experiments on rabbits and on cattle: larvae dropped off gorged Rabbit I Rabbit II Cattle 4th day 0 5 0 5 ,, 25 77 19 6 ,, 27 71 75 7 „ 33 29 27 8 ,, 7 5 11 9 ,, 5 1 2 10 1 4 0 Totals 98 192 134 Biologn of II. li'poris-palustriii 5ol Hadwon placed larvae on a tame rabbit (in Canada 12. iv. 1912) with the foUowinu" results: tjtli day 10 larvae dropped off t^or^'ed 7 .. 44 „ B „ 17 „ 9-10 ,, ^ „ Total 107 Nymphs: drop off gorged on the (ith day (from rabbit?) according to Hooker. Ruhr states that they remain (J-ll days on labbits and he records an expei-iment as folhnvs: 0th day 'd nymphs droi)pcd off gorged 7 ,, 12 ,, 8 ,, 48 ,, 9 „ 11 ,, 10 ■'> ,, 11 3 ,, 12 0 no more collected Hooker, Bishop}) and Wood state that the nymphs remain 4-8 da3's on the host, mostly 5-6 days; they carried out 4 experiments. Hadwen placed 32 nymphson a tame rabbit and 4 dropped off gorged after 6-7 days. Adults: accoi-ding to Rohr, the $ remains 19-25 days on the rabbit before it drops off gorged, whereas the (/ remains on the host long after the $ has left. Dead J's are commonly found attached to the host's skin. Hooker, Bishopp and Wood had difficulties in studying the adults; they only record the behaviour of 2 $ which dropped off gorged on the 19th and 21st day respectively. Time required for metamorphosis. Egg to Larva: reckoned from the time the eggs are laid, according to Rohr, the larvae emerge after 47-(31 days at ca. ■21-22'= C. (15 observations) 22-29 ,, „ 30" C. (3 „ ) none hatched out at 35° C. Hooker, Bishopp and Wood record that larvae emerge after 22 days at ca. 32° C. (out of doors in vi.-vii. 1909) 23 ,, ,, 28° C. (in laboratory in VI.-VII.) 34 ,, ,, 28° C. ( „ ,, v.-vi.) 24 „ 25° C. ( „ IX. 1907) 24 ,, „ 25° C. ( „ „ IX. 1907) 34 ,, „ 25° C. ( „ V.-VI. 1910) 532 ■ Genus Haem(q}]nisalis Hadwen found that the larvae emerged 47 days after the eggs were laid in May 1910; in 45 days after the eggs were laid in July 1911. Hunter and Hooker (1907) state that metamorphosis lasted 24-31 days in May-September. Larva to Nymph: reckoned from the time the larvae drop off gorged from the host, Rohr found that the nymphs emerged after 1.5-22 days at ca. 20-21'^ C. (5 observations) 8-12 ,, ,, 26-27° C. (5 „ ) 7-9 ,, ,, 30° C. (3 „ ) the ticks died without moulting at 35° C. Hooker, Bishopp and Wood recoid that the nymphs emerged after 18 days at ca. 20° C. (in March) 134 „ „ 16-5° C. (in November) Hooker gives 18 days as the time required for metamorphosis in October. Nymph to Adult: reckoned from the time the gorged nymphs abandon the host, Rohr found that the adults emerge after 19-2() days at ca. 20-22° C. 10-17 ,, ,, 27° C. Hooker, Bishopp and Wood record that the adults emerge after 11 days at ca. 28° C. (.June 1908) 89 ,, „ 15° C. ( „ ) 124 ,, was the longest period observed These authors noted no difference between the j" and $ in respect to the time required for metamorphosis. Hadwen records that from 12 gorged nymphs there emerged 2 adults after 53 days, and 1 adult after 58 days, in July-September, 1911. Longevity of unfed ticks. Larvae: Hooker, Bishopp and Wood found that larvae which emerged early in the summer, died in about 60 days; others which emerged in June, 1906, survived up to 258 days. Nymphs: these survived, in three experiments, for 78, 246 and 307 days respectively, the ticks being kept in the laboratory. Specimens taken from a rabbit survived for 342 days. Adults: a ^ lived for 403 days, a % for 588 days, both having emerged in May. Jiioloffji of II. Irj}oris-pa/t(stris 533 Oviposition. According to Rohr, the gorged and fecundated females begin to oviposit after 2- 5 days, and oviposition lasts 14-21 days at ca. 21' C. 13-15 ,, ,, „ 31-57 ,, „ 15 "C. Tlie female dies without ovipositing when maintained at 0°C. Hooker, Bishopp and Wood state that females begin to oviposit 3-15 days after they abandon the host, i.e. after 3 days at ca. 32^ C. (June 1910) 15 „ „ 20*^0. (March li»10) 8 days in the spring and summer being the average for 25 ? s observed According to Hadwen the female begins to oviposit aftei* 18 days (1 ? in May 1910) 8 ,, (15 „ „ 1911) (5 ,, (1 ? „ July 1911) The number of eggs laid per female varies as follows: Hunter and Hooker record that a % laid 1112 eggs; they give such small numbers of eggs as having been laid by three other females that I conclude they must have been disturbed or that they were imperfectly gorged specimens. Rohr's observations are given in detail. The largest number of eggs laid by one of five females was 2389 ; about 1820 would represent the average number. The most replete females lay the most eggs. The number of eggs laid per day, varied from 2 to 287 ; larger numbers per day were laid when the females were maintained at a higher temperature. We select two examples out of five tabulated by Rohr as showing the number of eggs laid by two females on successive da3-s. The first tick began to oviposit on the 5th day and died within 24 hours after oviposition had ceased as indicated by the +. Day 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 — — 46 75 79 112 158 178 148 176 172 187 118 82 134 76 49 27 19 2 + 52 298 148 105 46 171 236 161 209 92 225 135 99 159 132 58 84 44 23 22 10 — + Totals 1830 and 23S9 respectively. The female usually dies 0-4 days after oviposition has ceased (at 21° C), but she may survive 2-28 days at a lower temperature (15° C). Hooker, Bishopp and Wood record that 8 females laid 59-2240 eggs apiece, averaging 1517 ; they also note that the most gorged females lay the most eggs. One female oviposited for 20 days, the maximum number of eggs laid per day being 308. Females survi\i' 0-5 da^^s after oviposition has ceased. 534 Genus Haemaplty sails Weights and measurements. Rohr gives a number of data which I have compressed in tabular rm as follows : Egg Weiglit in mgr. 0-07 Average of 1000 Size in mm. 0-58 X 0-49 Average of 10 Larva: uufed 0-055 200 0-72x0-52 ,, replete 0-35 — 1-25x0-93 Nymph: unfed 0-2 20 1-22x0-85 ,, replete 2-0 — 2-16x1-47 ]\Iale: unfed 0-67 10 1-86x1-28 ,, fed 0-70 — 2-0 xl-28 Female": unfed 1-10 10 3-87x1-37 ,, replete 349-0 — 10x7-5x6-0 The foregoing measurements are of the length x breadth x thickness; in the case of the gorged female only the largest size and weight attained is given. A female which weighed 334'5 mgr. laid 1853 eggs, and, after ovi- position had ceased, she weighed 78 mgr. Hooker, Bishopp and Wood note that a female which laid 2240 eggs measured 11 "3 x 7 '5 x 5'3 mm. Insect enemies. Ixodiphagustexunns L. O. Howard (1907, p. 375) was first discovered in engorged nymphs of H. leporis-pahistris taken from wild rabbits in March and May, 1907, in Jackson County, Texas, by J. D. Mitchell. Summary and Remarks. H. leporis-pahistris requires three hosts upon which to feed in the larval, nymphal and adult stages respectively, as was first shown by Hunter and Hooker (1907), who state that it attacks wild rabbits in such numbers in Montana, U.S.A., that the animals may be weakened and thus rendered easy to capture. The larvae remain upon the host for 4-11 days, the majority taking 7-8 days to gorge ; nymphs remain attached for 4-11, the majority gorging in 6-8 days. The males persist upon the host which the females have abandoned ; they may die whilst attached to the skin. Rohr states that copulation must take place at night upon the host as he has never succeeded in observing the process by day. The female remains attached to the host 17-25 days. The time required for metamorphosis is infiuenced by temperature: Larvae emerge from the egg after 22-29 days at 30" C, or after 47-61 days at ca. 22° C. ; nymphs emerge after 7-9 days at 30° C, or after 134 days at 16-5° C. ; adults emerge after 10-17 days at 27° C. or after 89 days at Biology of TT. leporia-pahf^trifi 535 15° C, in one case they only emerged ut'tor 124 days. Longevity of unfed ticks : larvae survived 258 days, nymphs up to 342 days, a male and female lived up to 403 and 588 days respectively. Oviposition commences 2-18 days after the female has abandoned the host, the process lasting 14-57 days according to the surrounding temperature ; oviposition does not occur at 0" C. The female dies 0-28 days after she has ceased laying her quota of eggs. The normal number of eggs appears to be 1800-2400, laid at the maxiininii rate of abi)iit 800 in 24 hours. • Hooker states, from personal observation, that large numbers of larvae and lesser numbers of nymphs, when replete, abandon the host during the daytime. He regards this as a remarkable adaptation of the tick to the habits of their usual hosts, the haie and rabbit. These remain during the daytime in their resting places ov " forms " and roam at night. The gorged ticks, dropping from the host in the forms, undergo metamorphosis in a situation which favours their finding a host when they emerge and are ready to feed. The observation is certainly suggestive and it would be interesting to learn if other species of ticks behave in a similar manner. The ticks usually attach themselves about the ears and heads of rabbits. Laboratory experiments by the authors quoted above (p. 530), indicate that H. leporis-paUistris may, under favourable conditions, complete its life-cycle once or twice in a year. This supposition is strengthened by the statement of Hooker, Bishopp and Wood that all stages occur at all seasons upon their hosts in nature in the United States. Judging from the foregoing data the life-cj^cle may be completed in 87 to 405 days, as follows : Time required in days Minimum Maximum From the time the egg is laid to the emergence of the larva ...... Larva hardens ...... Larva stays on host ..... Metamorphosis : Larva to Nymph . Nymph hardens ...... Nymph stays on the host .... Metamorphosis: Nymph to Adult . Adult hardens ....... Adult ( ? ) stays on host Gorged ? , having dropped from the host, begins to lay eggs after ..... Totals 87 to 405 days 22 (at .30' C.) f)l (at 22^C.) 7 7 4 11 7 (at 30°C.) 134 (at 10-5° C.) 7 7 4 11 10 (at27^C.) 124 (at?°C.) 7 V 17 25 2 (at 21° C.) 18(at?°C.) 536 Genus Haemcvphy sails Haemaphysalis leachi\ Mr Charles P. Lounsbury, Union Entomologist, South Africa, was the first to raise this tick experimentally and to demonstrate that it transmits canine piroplasmosis in Africa. The protocols of his experi- ments (1901, pp. 5-G; 1902, pp. 5-7; 1904, pp. 27-29) give the main points in the life-history of the species. From his brief statements regarding the tick, the following data are abstracted : H. leachi is a three-host tick. The larvae and nymphs may drop off gorged from the host as early as 48 hours after being put on. The female remains upon the host for 9 days (minimum) to 12-15 days. The time required for metamorphosis from egg to larva is 30-46 days in summer and 80-110 days in winter; the nymph emerges from the larval skin in 10-12 days in summer; the adult emerges from the nymphal skin in 18-20 days in summer and 70-105 days in winter. A female laid 4200 eggs. The males remain upon the host for many weeks, they release their hold upon the skin of the host and seek the females. By using an incubator he hastened the process of meta- morphosis so that he was able to raise three generations in a year. The tick abandons the dying host. The following records relate (a) to ticks received in 1902-1906 from Mr Lounsbury, Cape Colony, S. Africa (they were used for infection of dogs with Piroplasma cams), and (b) to ticks received 23. ill. 1912 from Mr R. E. Montgomery, Nairobi, B. E. Africa. The last named were the progeny (larval stage) of two replete females collected beneath a box in which a jackal had been kept. The first and second generations raised in the laboratory are numbered respectively 1737 I and 1737 II. The time H. leachi remains upon the host. Host No. of Lot Date wlien l)ut on host Host main- tained at a temperature of Number of gorged ticks collected on succeeding days Larvae. Hedgehog 10 10. X. 190o 10'^ C. 126 on day 4 250 „ 5 ■j» 11 18. X. 1905 9"C. 104 „ 5 c> „ fi 12 28. X. 1905 9^ C. 0 „ 6 1 Reprinted, witli slight changes and additions, from Nuttall, iv. 1913, pp. 93-99. Blolufj!/ ^'f il If'avhi y.n Host Larvae. Hc'dKebo'l Jackal No. of Lot Jackal 17:^7 "I" Adults. (Female. Date when put on host 1(). XI. IDOG Number of Most main- Kortjed ticks taineii at a collected on temperature of succeeding days Reniarli^s 24. III. 1912 Dog 1737 "II" 22. XI. 1912 Nymphs. Hedgehog 10 . 25. IV. 190(5 11 11. V. 1906 18^ C. 20^ C. 19 on day 4 17 M 5 C „ 6 7 „ 7 4 „ 8 8 ,, 9-10 3 ,. 11 1 ,, 3 r.4 M 4 500 M 5 3.50 „ 6 .SO ,. 7 44 ,. 3 375 ,, 3 36 ,, 5 20 11 14. V. 1906 11° C. 3 12 2 ., 3 M 7 13 4. VI. 1906 16'^ C. 4 11 -5 1737 "I" 11. V. 1912 23° C. 13 1 y day 7 Larvae put on host 88 days (at 17° C.) after ecdysis. Progeny of 1737 1, V 11. SOputon, 20 recovered. 30puton, 17 recovered. 20 put on, 4 recovered. 13 nymphs put on host 15 days after ecdysis; all recovered. 19. v. 1912 23° C. 24 on 81 48 19 6 3 day 4 „ 5 „ 6 „ 7 ,, 9 ,, 11 Nymphs put on host 23 days after ecdysis. 27. v. 1912 22° C. 12 51 5 3 7 „ 3 „ 4 „ 5 „ 7 „ 9 Nymphs put on host 31 days after ecdysis. 1 29. v. 1902 Koom temp. ,, 12- 15 2 4. VI. — ,, 11- 12 — 3 18. I. 1904 ,, — ., 11 — 4 26. I. , — „ 14 — 5 21. X. ,, 10° C. — „ 12- 13 — 6 22. X. ,, 10° c. — M 14 — 538 Genus Haemaph}) sails Number of No. of Lot Date when put on liost Host main- tained at a temperature of gorged ticks collected on succeeding days Remarks Adults. (Female.) Jackal 1737 3. VII. 1912 20° C. 2 on day 10 Adults (7 cf , 7 ? ) put "I" 1 2 1 „ 12 ., 14 M 16 on host 32 days after ecdysis ; 6 ? 's re- covered. >> 1737 15. vn. 1912 20° C. 5 8 Adults (about 100 s "I" •5 18 10 7 1 1 1 9 „ 10 „ 11 „ 12 „ 13 ,. 14 „ 16 and ? ) put on host 44 days after ecdysis ; 48 ? 's recovered. The time required by H. leachi for metamorphosis. The time required for metamorphosis is reckoned as follows: — (1) F,gg to Larva: from the date on which the female began ovipositing to the day on which the first larvae emerged from the egg-shells ; (2) I.arva to Nynqih : from the date on which the larvae dropped off gorged to the day on which the first nymphs emerged ; (3) Nymph to Adult : from the date on which the nymphs dropped off gorged to the day on which the first adults emerged. i Egg to Larva. Lot Eggs laid on Larvae emerged after Eggs main tained at 1 15. XII. 1903 63 days — 2 14. III. 1904 80 12^ C. 3 2. V. 1904 58 13° C. 17371 16 . vii.-l VIII. 1912 26 -37 20° C. ^ See table relating to the progeny of 39 ? 's, etc. p. 540. Larva to Nymph. Lot la lb Ic Id 2 3 17371 Nymph to Adult. 1 2 1737 I Host Date on which gorged larvae dropped off host Nymphs emerged after Ticks maintained throughout at Ferret Rabbit 13. 10. VII. 1904 30 days 33 17° C. Hedgehog 11. ,, 32 J J Kid 20. VI. 1904 44 ,, Dog 2. IX. 1904 35 11° c. Hedgehog 23-24. X. 1905 39 10° c. Jackal 27-30. III. 1912 31 Adults emerged after 24-26° C. Rabbit 25. VII. 1904 42 days 14° C. Hedgehog 30. IV. 1906 70 14° C. Jackal 23. V. 1912 15-16 24-26° C. Blohijji of H. hachi ooO Longevity of unfed H. leachi. The longevity of the unfed tick is reckoned from the date of its emergence from the egg in the case of the larva, from the larval skin in the case of the nymph, from the uymphal skin in the case of the adult. Larvae. Lot Date of emergence Keiiiarks 1 12. VIII. 1904 StilllivelyafteroGdaysatlBC. In jar on earth. 2 '1\). VI. 1004 Dead after 44 days at 17'' C. 17371 12. vrii. 1912 Of the progeny of 32 ? 's isolated in separate corked tubes at room-temperature in semi-darkness, 8 lots were found dead after 322, 355, 360, 3(50, 362, 376, 376 and 400 days respec- tively ; about 2o"/„ of the larvae, composing each of the remaining 24 lots, survived for 354-378 days when they were used for raising experiments*. * Note added since the publication of the pajDcr from which this is extracted. Nymphs. 1737 I 7. XII. 1912 Lively after 61 days at 12"-^ C. Then raised to adults. Adults, lieceived vii. 1903 from Cape Colony, survived ca. 210 days at room temperature, and when placed on a dog produced infection with piroplasmosis. Observations relating to oviposition, etc. Lot No. Date wlien gorged females ilropped from host Oviposition began after Ticks maintained at temperature of 1 X. 1903 60 days Cool room. 2 l.-iii. 1904 47 ,, 3 3. III. „ 24 ,, 4 24. V. „ 18 16° C, 5-8 iv.-v. ,, 14 16-21° C. 17371 vii.-viii. 1912 3-5 23° 0. * * This holds for 33 out of 35 ? 's, the two remaining oviposited on days 9 and 12 respectively. Summary. Haeiuaphysalis leachi requires three hosts upon which t(^ feed chu-ing its larval, nymphal and adult stages. It readily attaches itself to the host at each stage in about a week after ecdysis. It is easily reared under experimental conditions upon a number of different hosts (jackal, dog, ferret, hedgehog, goat, labbit), and it ap|)ears to be inuiiaterial upon which of these hosts it feeds. The larva and nymph i-emain attached to the host foi- .3-7 days (2-8 days, Lounsbury), occasionally longer; the females remain attached longer, i.e. 8-16 day.s. The males 540 Genus Haeniaphj /sails Record relating to 39 H. leachi $ 's {Lot 1737 1) and their progeny. 1 -S.2 _ c4 o ° ° 5 0) t^'CO 1 10 3 25 2 — 27 2 10 4 26 5 — 26 3 12 4 29 5 2982 29 4 14 5 29 6 3626 28 5 14 3 31 8 4575 30 6 16 4 28 13 3362 28 7 8 4 32 5 3660 30 8 8 0 26 8 3043 29 9 8 4 21 5 — 28 10 8 9 27 8 2400 32 11 8 4 21 0 — 30 12 9 4 26 7 4803 33 13 9 3 34 15 3815 32 14 9 4 17 1 — 30 15 9 5 24 9 3595 33 16 9 5 31 12 — 32 17 10 4 22 13 — 30 18 10 3 30 31 3763 30 19 10 3 24 5 — 29 20 10 3 29 7 4817 29 21 10 3 31 15 — 29 22 10 4 32 6 — 29 23 10 4 29 3 3811 29 24 10 4 29 2 — 30 25 10 3 30 3 — 30 26 10 4 29 3 3395 32 27 10 — — — — — 28 10 3 30 15 — 30 29 10 5 30 6 — 30 30 10 — — — — — 31 10 5 28 6 — 29 32 11 — — — — — 33 12 — — — — — 34 10 3 30 6 — 30 35 10 3 26 3 — 31 36 10 12 — — * — 37 13 3 28 2 — 30 38 14 3 28 0 — 34 39 16 5 37 10 — 37 16. VII.- 10. VIII.- at 20° C. 12. viii.- 1. VIII. 12 11. IX. 12 11. IX. 12 at 22-5° C. at20°C. at20°C. * Laid a few unfertilized eggs. Biology of IL leachi :A\ may remain upon the host for many weeks (according to Lounsbury). The temperature of the air within the limits observed (9-23'' C.) appears to exert h'ttle or no influence upon the time the tick remains upon the host, the warmth emanating from the hxtter being doubtless sufficient to keep the ticks active. The time required for metamorphosis ' is influenced by temperature, thus the larvae hatch after 26-37 days at 20° C, in 58 to 80 days at 12-13° C; the nymphs emerge, as a rule, after 30 to 40 days; adults emerge after 15-16 days at 24-26 C. whereas they may only emerge after 42-70 days at 14' C. The longevity of the unfed tick is considerable when the conditions are favourable ; in small corked bottles some larvae were still active after 399 days, the nymphs after 61 days and the adults after about 210 days when maintained at room temperature in semi-darkness and all stages fed upon their hosts after these periods. When males and females are simultaneously placed upon the host they scatter, but the sexes are found attached in close proximity to each other after 2-3 days. Copu- lation must take place upon the host, though it has never been actually observed. (Lounsbury has seen males, which he had marked, detach themselves and reattach themselves close to females ; a male may mate with more than one female.) I find that the males do not seek the females as do Ixodes when the sexes have been removed from the host. The time which elapses before oviposition commences, after the replete female a andons the host, is markedly influenced by temperature ; thus, when females were placed at 23° C. they began to lay after 3-5 days, at 1 6-21° C. after 14-18 days, at lower temperatures after 24, 47 to 60 days. Whereas an occasional female dies as soon as oviposition has ended, others may survive for a few days or, in exceptional cases, for a month The female lays from 2400 to 4800 eggs. H. leachi begins to abandon its host on the approach of death in a manner that neither Lounsbury nor myself has observed in other ticks. In nature, this tick may doubtless run twice through its life cycle in a year. By the use of an incubator, as first shown by Lounsbury, this author succeeded in raising three generations in a year. Taking average figures from my protocols of ticks raised under favourable conditions, the cycle may be completed in 123 days, as follows : ' See reference to Lounsbury's observations on p. 536. 35 542 Genus Haemapliy sails Time required, in days From the time egg is laid to emergence of larva 30 (Eggs to 20° C.) Larva hardens 7 Larva stays on host 5 Metamorphosis : Larva to Nymph 31 (Larvae at 17° C.) Nymph hardens 7 Nymph stays on host ... 5 Metamorphosis : Nymph to Adult 15 (Nymphs at 24°C.) Adult hardens 7 Adult ? stays on host ... 12 Gorged ? drops from host and waits before layi ag 4 123 days Relation of H. leachi to disease, H. leachi occurs all over Africa, and wherever it occurs it is the carrier of a very fatal disease in dogs known as canine piroplasmosis or malignant jaundice. The relation of the tick to this disease and the pathology, parasitology and treatment of the malady, are fully treated in the following papers, the titles of which will be found in Biblio- graphies I and II of this work : Nuttall, 1904, pp. 219-257 ; 1905, pp. 12-32 ; ix. 1908, pp. 513-526. Nuttall and Graham Smith, vn. 1905, pp. 237-249 ; 1906, pp. 536-651 ; 1907, pp. 232-272; x. 1908, pp. 243-260; ix. 1909, pp. 211-214, 215-228. Nuttall and Hadwen, vn. 1909, pp. 156-191; ix. 1909, pp. 229-235. Nuttall, x. 1913, pp. 302-320. Many of these papers are illustrated. Haemaphysalis concinna. The only observations on the biology of this species are by Brumpt in France, who has kindly supplied me with his MS. notes thereon. Brumpt has found the adults only upon deer, attached in the cervical region, especially along the mane, occasionally at the base of the ears, and rarely elsewhere. When placed experimentally upon dogs, they attached themselves anywhere. The sexes are found attached close together upon deer. Nymphs and larvae were found by Brumpt on deer and hedgehog and it is probable that they occur on other mammals ; they attach themselves anywhere upon the hosts mentioned. Biology of H. eoncinna 543 Time the tick remains upon the host. The Larvae, a few days after emergence, attach themselves quickly to a variety of hosts (deer, hedgehog, dog, guinea-pig, rat, mouse) and gorge themselves with blood or lymph in 8-10 days ; nearly all of them abandon the host in 3-5 days. The Nymphs, a few days after emerging, attach themselves to the same hosts as do the larvae and feed to repletion in 8-12 days, mostly abandoning the host in 4-5 days. The Adults, after fasting for weeks or months, attach themselves to the host whereon they copulate, probably after 4 days, for the sexes are then found attached close together with their venters juxtaposed. The fertilized female becomes replete in 8-10 days ; she is then slate- coloured and weighs on an average, when fully gorged, 0"35 g. Unfertilized females may stay for several weeks upon the host remaining about a third gorged. Time required for metamorphosis. Egg to Larva : the larvae emerge some weeks after the eggs are laid and they are capable of living for a long time unfed. Larva to Nymph: nymphs emerge 17 days after they abandon the host as gorged larvae when maintained at 25-30° C. From 64 gorged larvae found upon a hedgehog, 64 nymphs emerged. NympJi to Adult: adults emerge after 22 days at 25° C. From 4 gorged nymphs found on a stag at Chantilly there emerged 4 cT after 2 months: from 15 gorged nymphs found on a hedgehog there emerged 15 adults. Certain incompletely gorged nymphs undergo metamorphosis to adults very slowly and they often die before it is completed. H. eon- cinna differs in this respect from certain species of ticks, for instance Amblyomma cayennense (as seen by Aragao, 1912, p. 96), Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and R. sanguineus (Nuttall, 1913, p. 195; Cunliffe, 1914, p. 372), Dermacentor reticulatus (as seen by Brumpt), wherein im- perfectly gorged nymphs were found to give rise to small adults. Oviposition. At a temperature of 18° C, oviposition occurs in about the second week. The eggs are larger than those of Ixodes ricinus, they are dark salmon coloured. Each female usually lays upwards of 1000 eggs. 544 Genus Haemaphy sails Table showing the prevalence of Haemaphy salts on Deer in France as observed hy Dr E. Brumpt. Number of deer examined Total 29 Date 1911 3. XI. 7. XII. 16. XII. 1912 24. I. 13. II. 20. II. 27. II. 28. II. 18. III. 4. III. 30. III. 13. IV. 17. IV, 24. IV. 31. IX. 3. X. 8.x. 14.x. 21. X. 21. X. 24.x. 18-19 XI. and XII. 1913 28. IV. 30. IV. Locality * Fontainebleau Indre Fontainebleau Vienne Indre Compiegne Fontainebleau Indre Fontainebleau Chantilly H. concinna 02 03 ?14 L 1 Q3 ^1 cf 18 (f - ? many ^3 . . .