om a poate Bae ent satearh tetey a moet a = a . Cite ten - ~ pear reeves i in om ; te cerchione tpi chepatenanas allows ok ab a =i as pots esese $349 TRANSACTIONS OF THE American Microscopical Society VOLUME XXXVII 1918 TRANSACTIONS OF THE American Microscopical Society ORGANIZED 1878 INCORPORATED 1891 PUBLISHED OQUARTEREY BY THE SOCIETY EDITED BY THE SECRETARY VOLUME XXXVII NUMBER ONE Entered as Second-class Matter December 12, 1910, at the Post-office at Decatur, Illinois, under act of March 3, 1879. DEcATuR, ILL. REvIEW Printinc & STATIONERY Co. 1918 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR VOLUME XXXVII, Number 1, January 1918 Insects as Carriers of Disease, by Malcolm Evan MacGregor............ Ps Acanthocephala of North American Birds, with Plates I to V, by H. J. Wianin Cleauerc cc rintras etl euler a heriocis ig a se oot ta scaMlaley s aleler ere) cya Sretteveh eet 19 Branchiobdellid Worms (Annelida) from Michigan Crawfishes, by Max Wehbe Seg Set aa le ee MN ee 8 Se EA Leg trae rear 49 Notes and Reviews: A Chart on General Plant Histology and Physiology (Plate VI), Raymond J. Pool; Method of Mounting Anatomical Preparations for Exhibition, G. G. Scott; Green Light for Demon- strating Living Cestode Ova, M. M. Ellis; A New Method of Stain- ing Tissues Containing Nerves, Fontana’s Spirochete Stain, Simple Method of Cleansing Old Slides, Menthol for Narcotizing, abstracted by V. A. Latham; Freshwater Biology (Ward and Whipple); An Introduction to the History of Science (Libby) ; A Short History of Science (Sedgwick and Tyler); Biochemical Catalysts in Life and Read easityy: CEE T ORIG ) shoe ots oh acd wah tence os ae ataecled ae ear at alan 4S Sane ane of fs 53 Minutes ot the Pittsbure Meeting. aie5 2.5 he soe aes ole aig Sas caeraeiaate 7i PAAR SU ECCDOEE (6 a5, ois 8 oh altel visita kslosaiseoarehai ot Alga Ga monde sielkaitasene saree 72 WEES GEE SUMEDOEEN S: Go)) db nek snob etna son neh Who save EME, ks AS ate age 73 (This Number was issued on March 25, 1918) OFFICERS President =) No. ES. (GRIRVING 2 ois. 52! 40,5 Sis cies s amie bole eee sires Pittsburg, Pa. First Vice President: H.M. WHELPLEY................-0000- St. Louis, Mo. Secona Vice President: (GC. (0. ESTERLY ..oe sos 33 ove sie ne Los Angeles, Cal. Secretar ye) (che WoGAEEOWy os ade. Ssidieid Selete weal ete bere ole wie eee one Beloit, Wis. Dv CRSUFEKS ERS yc VAM OCTBAVE! « S'c'5.8 2 eis Sinks oe Da Ale o oe aie Urbana, IIl. Gustodian> | MAGNUS (EFEAUME Halas Siete. soviet ee lantels kore se iets Meadville, Pa. ELECTIVE MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1 ey INTE Dh ee a ee ASS AEG "2 3 Boulder, Colo. DESPRE RERT Soe aye airs wie ais abla cee 5 50 p siaieis wi a ele Svs sib lelesopginibl arn Sine Manhattan, Kas. EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Past Presidents Still Retaining Membership in Society ALBERT McCa.ta, Ph.D., F.R.M.S., of Chicago, Ili. Geo. E Fett, M.D., F.R.M.S., of Buffalo, N. Y., Simon Henry Gace, B.S., of Ithaca, N. Y., at Chicago, IIl., 1883 at Detroit, Mich., 1890 at Ithaca, N. Y., 1895 and 1906 A. Currrorp Mercer, M.D., F.R.M.S., of Syracuse, N. Y., at Pittsburg, Pa., 1896 at New York City, 1900 at Denver, Colo., 1901 at Winona Lake, Ind., 1903 at Sandusky, Ohio, 1905 A. M. Briere, M.D., of Columbus, Ohio, C. H. E1icenmann, Ph.D., of Bloomington, Ind., E. A. Birce, LL.D., of Madison, Wis., Henry B. Warp, A.M., Ph.D., of Urbana, IIl., S. lumb hio, 4 ( Herpert Oszorn, M.S., of Columbus, Ohio ai Minacapalie ans gid at Washington, D. C., 1911 at Cleveland, Ohio, 1912 at Philadelphia, Pa., 1914 at Columbus, Ohio, 1915 at Pittsburg, Pa., 1917 A. E. Hertzver, M.D., of Kansas City, Mo., F. D. Heap, Ph.D., of Philadelphia, Pa., CHARLES BrooKover, Ph.D., of Louisville, Ky., Cuartes A. Kororp, Ph.D., of Berkeley, Calif., M. F. Guyer, Ph.D., of Madison, Wis., The Society does not hold itself responsible for the opinions expressed by members in its published Transactions unless endorsed by special vote. TRANSACTIONS OF American Microscopical Society (Published in Quarterly Installments) Vol. XXXVII JANUARY 1918 No. 1 INSECTS AS CARRIERS OF DISEASE By Matcotm Evan MacGrecor Wellcome Bureau of Scientific Research So much has been said about insects since the War began that it is, I think, advisable that some attempt should be made to sum- marize our knowledge of the more important insect-borne diseases and their vectors. While insects have long been suspected of being responsible for the transmission of serious diseases, it may be said that practically the whole of our knowledge of insects in this rdle has been acquired within the past twenty years. So rapidly, how- ever, has the charge of this offence been made out against them that, although it is common knowledge they have been proved guilty, it is not generally realized upon how many counts the verdict rests. It has lately been my good fortune to give class instruction for the War Office to officers of the R. A. M. C. who are proceed- ing to the East, and, in order to bring home to my audience the importance of the connection between insects and disease, I have compiled the tables which I now publish. These can in no way claim to be complete, but merely present the more important insect- borne diseases, including important human diseases that on certain grounds are suspected of having insect vectors. With these tables I also publish one (Table VI) which includes the chief insects and acarina that are directly the cause of disease in man and his domestic animals. To complete the list of insect-transmitted diseases would demand the consideration not only of other mammals as hosts, but also of avian and reptilian hosts. In the present instance this would be to carry the subject beyond general interest, but it must be remembered, therefore, that, long as the present list of charges is, insects are not here arraigned on all the counts that might with justice be preferred against them. Reprinted from Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, Sept. 15, 1917; xx, 18. 8 M. E. MAC GREGOR During the last few years medical entomology has been rapidly establishing itself an an invaluable branch of preventive medicine, and with the outbreak of the present War a great deal of interest and study has been devoted to this subject in Europe, notably in connection with the transmission of typhus fever by lice, and the dissemination of bacteria and other organisms by flies. Moreover, the importance of insect vectors has been generally realized, and many of the astonishing interactions between pathogenic micro- organisms and certain arthropoda have become popular knowledge. Centuries ago insects were suggested as being possibly con- cerned in the spread of disease, and from time to time such logical hypotheses were advanced that it is surprising that the establishment of the truth was not sooner forthcoming. In 1577 Mercurialis, an Italian physician, suggested that plague, which was then ravaging Europe, was spread by flies feeding upon the diseased and dead, and later depositing feecal matter on food consumed by healthy persons. This idea held ground, and various suggestions occur as to the spread of disease by flies in the literature of the eighteenth century. Edward Bancroft in 1769 advanced the theory that “yaws’” was transmitted by flies feeding on diseased subjects, and carrying the contagion by settling on open wounds or scratches on healthy per- sons. In 1848 Dr. Josiah Nott, of Mobile, Alabama, published a remarkable article in which he gave reasons for supposing that yellow fever was an insect-borne disease. However, although he mentioned many insects, he did not specify any insect as the particu- lar vector. The connection between malaria and the mosquito had long been held, it is said, by the Italian and Tyrolese peasants, and even by the natives of East Africa, but the first charge brought against the mosquito in the spread of disease by scientific authority was in connection with yellow fever. In 1853 Dr. Daniel Beauperthuy, a French physician, wrote ably arguing that yellow fever and other fevers were transmitted by mosquitoes, but in those days there being no accepted belief in a contagium vivum, he concluded that the virus was obtained from decomposing material that the mosquito had consumed, and which INSECT CARRIERS OF DISEASE ) was later accidentally inoculated into man. MRaimbert in 1869 showed by experiment that anthrax could be disseminated by flies. Epoch-making in the history of our knowledge of insect vectors was Manson’s discovery in 1878 that Filaria bancrofti was spread by mosquitoes, but at first he thought the filarie escaped from the insect into water, and reached man in this manner. Later work by Manson and his colleagues determined the exact means of trans- mission. It was not until twenty-eight years after Beauperthuy’s theory that Charles Finlay, an American of Havana, in 1881 definitely attributed the transmission of yellow fever to a mosquito of a definite species. He had noticed the connection that seemed to exist between the presence of large numbers of Stegomyia fasciata and the prevalence of yellow fever. He then attempted to transmit the disease experimentally by the bites of this mosquito, and al- though his experiments are open to criticism, there is no doubt that he did succeed in doing so. Three years later, in 1883, another American, A. F. A. King, advanced the first well formulated mosquito-malaria theory, and in 1898 Ross, in India, demonstrated beyond doubt the important role played by mosquitoes in the transmission of malaria. In 1899 the American Yellow Fever Commission (Reed, Car- roll, Lezear, and Agramonte) were sent to Cuba, and were there able to demonstrate with certainty that yellow fever is transmitted by S. fasciata. It is interesting thus to note the almost parallel development in time of our knowledge of two of the most important insect-borne diseases. To deal even briefly with the historical aspects of our knowledge of other diseases tabulated below would be to consume a large amount of space, and the foregoing account will have indi- cated the path that has led to subsequent discoveries whose histories are readily available. I will pass, therefore, to a few notes on each of the tables. Notes To TABLE I.—DIsEASES OF UNKNOWN ORIGIN The majority of these diseases are doubtless caused by living viruses; often organisms of ultra-microscopic size, and commonly referred to as “filterable viruses.” 10 M. E. MAC GREGOR In the case of pellagra it would appear, however, from the most recent work that, although it is still considered by many persons to be a possible insect-borne disease (and, according to Sambon, having a likely vector in either the Ceratopogonine or Simulude), Goldberger in America considers it a disease now cer- tainly attributable to vitamine-starvation through an wnbalanced diet. If this is the case, there is no causative organism and no vector, and pellagra should be ruled out of present consideration. The question, nevertheless, is by no means settled. The virus of acute anterior poliomyelitis is still not isolated with certainty. Flexner and his colleagues have been able to culti- vate a filterable micro-organism which produced the disease in experimental animals, and more recently Rosenow and his fellow workers have isolated a polymorphous streptococcus, with which they were also able to proauce paralysis in certain animals. Nuzum and Herzog were able to do likewise by a Gram-positive micrococcus isolated from the brain and spinal cord of persons dead from the disease. Poliomyelitis has been very generally suspected of being trans- mitted by insects, particularly by Stomoxys calcitrans (the stable- fly), fleas, and Tabanide (gad-flies). Nevertheless, it appears more likely that it has an eerial transmission, infection being acquired through the buccal and nasal mucous membranes. The causative organism of Rocky Mountain spotted fever, Wol- bach claims to have discovered in the bodies of infective ticks (Der- macentor venustus ). Notes To TABLE JI.—DIsEASES OF BACTERIAL ORIGIN In the majority of cases, diseases of this class have an indirect transmission by insects—that is to say, instead of the organism entering the body of the host through inoculation by the bite of an insect (direct transmission), the organisms are carried in or on the insect’s body, and are deposited by contact on human food or skin abrasions, and in this manner cause infection. Bacillus tuberculosis may be disseminated by house-flies feeding on infective sputum, as was first shown by Spillman and Haushalter (1887), and subsequently by the investigations of other workers. N. B.—Names between Tasce I, THE MORE IMPORTANT INSECT-BORNE DISEASE OF UNKNOWN ORIGIN square brackets = certain vectors; names without square brackets = probable vectors; names followed by ? = possible vectors. Organism Host Disease Vector De reigre fren ro ean aot Dengue (breakbone fever) er [Sandflies (Phlebotomus), Mosquitoes. C. fatigans; S. fas- Three-day fever, syns. “Dog ciata] ; Poseurs iets Hare Me ates disease,’ Sandfly fever, Phle- {Sandflies (Phlebotomus), Mosquitoes. C. fatigans; S. fas- botomus fever ciata] Ceeraieve etaie cele de AO Yellow fever noe ee [Mosquitoes (Stegomyia fasciata)] Ree stete ote are we 500 Trench fever SOE rays Lice ? ? Salivary toxin? she dy oBe Tick paralysis (American) ciate [Ticks, (Dermacentor venustus)] ? Salivary toxin? fre ee wae Tick paralysis (Australian) est [Ticks (Ixodes ricinus)] Papestars atio eee 2 Be Rocky Mountain spotted feve [Ticks (Dermacentor venustus)] : Petetere teat ate Ud Ae Japenese river fever (shima [Mites (Larval trombidiide)] “aka mushi’” mushi Reetatas ware SAG bu ae Acute anterior poliomyelitis siene ? Many insects have been claimed as vectors, notably Stomoxys calcitrans? Pees mate ees dg wie Pellagra Save tan acre ? Gnats of the genus Simulium have been claimed? Poeiais inv eee ? sats Typhus fever site eee [Lice] - Taare II. THE MORE IMPORTANT INSECT-BORNE DISEASES OF BACTERIAL ORIGIN N. B.—Names between square brackets = certain vectors; names without square brackets = probable vectors; names followed by ? = possible vectors. The word “flies” includes in the main: Musca domestica, Fannia sps., Calliphora sps., Lucilia sps., and Sarcophaga sps. Organism Host Disease Vector Bacillus anthracis els iets .».» Man and animals Anthrax aye ... Flies], Tabanid@? Beetles? F zy dysenterie ... thes wie’ ot: ere --- Bacillary dysentery dite [Flies] (Musca domestica, Calliphora sps., Lucilla _sps.) : zh lepre aiale eine tele id 400 -.. Leprosy wee ahi LIES Fleas? Bed-bugs? Skin mites? : : Mosquitoes? # paratyphosus A arene wane ae ac ae Paratyphoid fever ats [Flies] a B ofthe “aes ide Fate aes 4 # Ee a eesl 2 pestis a tere arts dire ” and rats ... Plague ACD ..-. [Fleas] 4 tuberculosis aiie aCe ” and animals Tuberculosis ... ... Flies, cockroaches, fleas? Bed-bugs? Bacillus typhosus Riise ae verste wee Lae pense Dy DHOIantever -»- [Flies] Bartonia bacilliformis «x-bodies stake ie fee cee Verruga AG ... [Phlebotomus verrucum] : Spirillum cholere SAD wile ave dd shale -.-- Cholera arts ... [Flies], cockroaches, ants. Although the main channel of infection is the consumption of infected food and water 12 M. E. MAC GREGOR With the high vitality and resistance to drying possessed by the B. tuberculosis, the possibly long incubation period within the body and the insidious onset of the disease, the danger from Musca domestica in this connection is still not sufficiently recognized. Human infection with plague and typhus has been shown to be acquired principally by the entrance of the virus through skin lesions, the insect vector having been crushed either during or after the act of blood-sucking. The stomach contents or infected excreta may be rubbed into the lesions or gain entry through abrasions caused by scratching. This, however, does not preclude the possibility of direct infec- tion also occurring, at least sometimes in the case of plague, as the infected flea has the proventriculus occluded by the plague organ- isms when the flea infection is at its height. Septiceemia following mosquito bites occasionally happens, and as likely as not the path- ogenic organisms are introduced when the mosquito bites. Direct transmission by blood-sucking insects may possibly also occur in certain instances in the spread of tuberculosis and leprosy. If Wolbach’s organism (see Table I and notes thereto) is proved to be the cause of Rocky Mountain spotted fever, this will also be a disease of bacterial origin with direct transmission through a tick, Dermacentor venustus. Notes To TABLE II]I.—DIsEASES OF SPIROCHZTAL ORIGIN With these diseases the usual method of transmission is direct —that is to say, through the bites of the insect vectors. Exceptions occur in the case of relapsing fever transmitted indirectly by lice, and yaws where Musca domestica may at times convey the organism from diseased to healthy persons. Notes To TABLE IV.—DISEASES OF PROTOZOAL ORIGIN Both direct and indirect methods of transmission by insects occur with diseases of this class. With the intestinal parasites, indirect transmission takes place by the flies feeding on feces con- taining the resistant stages (cysts), and later depositing them on human food and drinking water either by regurgitation of the stomach contents, or more often per anum, as Wenyon and O’Con- c Organism Host Micrococcus melitensts ead Ane Diplococcus intracellularis —... on Man fs pemphigi contagiost mies yu. Taste IJ.—(Continued.) Tropical impetigo Tasle III. Disease Man and goats... Undulant fever; syns. Malta fever, Mediter- ranean fever, Remit- tent fever aire ... Cerebrospinal fever ... Vector [Flies]. Although the main channel of infec- tion is the consumption of goat’s milk Flies? [Lice] THE MORE IMPORTANT INSECT-BORNE DISEASE OF SPIROCHATAL ORIGIN N. B.—Names between square brackets = certain vectors; names without square brackets = probable vectors; names followed by ? = possible vectors. The word “flies” includes in the main:—Musca domestica, Fannia sps., Calliphora sps., Lucilia sps., and Sarcophaga sps. Organism Host Spirocha@ta carteri ROrhS Soe Man Aen nde duttont Rec ort " erage a! gallinarum ateceomeentey Fowls Aa 4 novyi Siraawe tele Man wits zy pertenuis Seren WY apc ” recurrentis AC eerie, Lu cee a berbera Steen te aie Disease Indian relapsing fever African 2 Spirochetosis ai American relapsing fever ... Yaws (Frambeesia) aie European relapsing fever ... North African relapsing fever . TaBLeE IV. eee Mel (Tick fever) Wes Vector [Lice] [Ticks (O. moubata, O. savigny)) [Argas persicus] [Lice] Flies? [Lice]. [Lice] Bed-bugs? THE MORE IMPORTANT INSECT-BORNE DisEAsES OF ProTozoAL ORIGIN N. B.—Names between square brackets = certain vectors; names without square brackets = probable vectors; names followed by ? = possible The word “flies” includes in the main: Organism Host Entameba histolytica -.. Man ares Lamblia intestinalis* Pare 3 seme Plasmodium malarie sere As Noo 4 vivax ae 2 arate ay falciparum oa =F are vectors, Disease ... Ameebic dysentery ... Flagellate ” ere «+» Quartan malaria ...— ... Benign tertian malaria ... Malignant or subtertian malaria Musca domestica, Fannia sps., Calliphora sps., Lucilia sps., and Sarcophaga sps. Vector ... [Flies] ... L[Flies) ..- [Anopheline mosquitoes] ... [Anopheline mosquitoes] ... [Anopheline mosquitoes] 14 M. E. MAC GREGOR nor have shown recently.t_ Needless to say, infection also occurs— and perhaps principally—by mechanical and erial transmission of the cysts to food and water. The majority of the protozoal blood parasites have insect vectors, on which they depend solely for transmission, and in cer- tain cases these vectors are specific: Malaria, Anophelines; sleep- ing sickness, Glossine ; European relapsing fever, Pediculi. Other insect-borne blood parasites are apparently able to be transmitted by more than one vector, i. e., Kala-azar, bed-bug (Patton) ; kala-azar, Triatoma rubofasciatus (Donovan); Souma (Trypanosomiasis), Glossine ; Souma (Stomoxys calcitrans). Notes To TABLE V.—DISEASES OF HELMINTHAL ORIGIN With the exception of possible infection with certain helminths, resulting from the carriage by flies of helminth ova from feces and subsequent deposition of the ova on food, the insect-borne helminths all undergo part of their life-history in the body of the insect vector. Thus the adult Filaria bancrofti live in human lymphatic glands. The ova find their way into the blood-stream, where they hatch to the Microfilariz, and some are taken up from the blood when a mosquito bites a person harbouring the organisms. These, if they have entered the stomach of Culex fatigans, or other intermediate host, soon make their way to the thoracic muscles of the mosquito, where they undergo definite metamorphosis. When this is complete (usually in from sixteen to twenty days) the worms make their way into the mosquito’s proboscis, and when next it pierces the skin of some victim the filariz burst through the pro- boscis sheath and make their own passage through the skin, from which they soon travel to some lymphatic gland, where they become sexually mature, and the cycle is repeated. Similarly, Dipylidium caninum passes part of its life-history in the rat flea, and becomes sexually mature in the dog or man. The ova are ingested by the larval flea, and infection by the cysticercoid stage follows the acci- dental ingestion of the flea by the definite host. “The Carriage of Cysts of Entameba histolytica and other protozoa, and eggs of Parasitic Worms by House-flies, with some Notes on the Resistance of Cysts to Disinfect- ants and other Agents.” C. M. Wenyon and F. W. O’Connor, Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps, May, 1917, p. 522. TasLe IV.—(Continued.) Organism Host Disease Vector Leishmania tropica eee . ae ... Oriental sore re: eat -». Flies? Fleas? Phlebotomus? Hippobosca? ee donovani fev Le stare ... Kala-azar Ath Sere ... Bed-bugs? Fleas? Triatoma? tt sp. incerta naw ste Mere ... Espundia Re ave ..» Probably some tropical blood-sucking Insect 2 infantum ... Children Nat ... Leishmaniasis aL Rare ..+ Fleas? Trypanosoma gambiense -». Man aves ..- Sleeping sickness... RG ... [Glossina palpalis (Tsetse flies)] ae rhodesiense eine 4 moe pare | Leon aad ... (Glossina morsitans) ” u 2 brucei ... Cattle and horses ... Fly sickness (Nagana) ies ... (Glossina morsitans) _” Ps td lewisi en ate Grave ... Rat trypanosomiasis aleve ... Rat louse? and [Rat fleas (Ceratophyllus fasciatus), Ctenocephalus canis] bg evansi .-.- Horses, mules, camels Sutras acs core aie tere io flies (Tabanidew), Tabanus striat- us Schizotrypanum crusi --» Man AP --» Chaga’s disease ... sera ... [Triatoma (Conorhinus) megistus] Babesia bigeminum eee Cattle stale -.. Red-water fever ... nae ... [Ticks (Margaropus annulatus)) td ovis ane «++ Sheep aac ..- Piroplasmosis Seto Ante ..» [Ticks (Rhipicephalus bursa)] fe! canis mais wre WORE sere ... Malignant jaundice ee ... [Ticks (Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Hemaphysalis leachi)] ” caballi Bite ... Horses and mules ... Piroplasmosis tiare On ... [Ticks (Dermacentor reticulatus)] Nuttallia equi Ge cere Us ” atin ot Rae ara ... (Ticks (Rhipicephalus evertsi)] ? Chlamydozoa ? atic Perey Evel AGO .»» Ophthalmia egyptica and other ophthal- [Flies] mic conditions *By some authorities Lamblia intestinalis is not regarded as pathogenic, TaBLe V. THE MORE IMPORTANT INSECT-BORNE DisEASES OF HELMINTH ORIGIN N. B.—Names between square brackets = certain vectors. The word “flies” includes in the main: Musca domestica, Fannia sps., Calliphora sps., Lucilia sps., and Sarcophaga sps. Organism Host Disease Vector Dipylidium caninum ... Man and dogs ... Teniasis (tapeworm) ... ... [Dog louse (Trichodectes latus)]; [Dog flea (Ctenocephalus canis)]; and the [Human flea (Pulex irritans)] Ova of certain helminths Man Ati ... Helminthiasis (parasitic worms) [Flies] | Microfilaria bancrofti ite « at ... Filariasis (Elephantiasis) ... [Mosquitoes (Culex and Anopheles sps.)] Loa loa trae in Ms ScrC .». Calabar swellings aoe Ah Hees fiies (Chrysops dimidiata and Chrysops silacea Filaria immitis. | .». Dogs ie ... Dog filariasis are ... (Mosquitoes (Culex and Anopheles sp.)] Hymenolepis diminuta Rats, and occasionally Tzniasis ce aes no Lees) man CQTAOIpad) 91T] 10}09A, AO bie Bae al DuLosouryzuns) OyMbso~) EE 30799, VNIaVIY GNV SLOASN] OL AIAVINAIBLLV ATLOAZAIAG SASVASICG LNVLYOdNI (ueu SNART sine aseasiq ueW ysoP] *10}99A Ule}I9D = sjoyeIq sIenbs us9Mjeq suIeN—g ‘N NISIYO SNONNY AO SUsvVaSIQ] ANUOM-LOASNT LINVLYOdWI AXON AH] eee UOT SNOIULIND 91IZAIG arqnd pue Areyyixe eee Pog, ‘ peey a4} JO stsojnoipag BOIqe Os tO Mots you vido) (4931 _.S199015)) “ (ws [IueA,, Pal[eo-os 243) eee soe “ce siqI}euLsaq apie UOTZE}LIIT SNOSUEINI 919AIZG io SIseIAul O11}Se siseIAw [eseN eee sae Ul aseasip Surdaes9) “ “ee eee “cc “ce ae “ee SISBIAUL [PULIIC SISEIAW [BUIJop pue ‘IeB[MNolIne ‘jeseNy “ce “ “ee “ec ac “ec “ae “ “e “ee SISEIAU JE[NOSNU puke [eUlsop ‘;eur}sozUT eee eee “e ae “ae ae “e “e siseidul [euljsojuy aseasiq sjeuirue pur “ “é one eee uey --* sjemIue pue _, eee ose ueW eee “++ sass0yy (uew » FIXATION K PLATE VI AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY 57 erly balanced conception of the chief features of the subject in question. Such figures may be constructed in great detail and with much technical skill or they may be more or less crude and diagrammatic and still be of great value to the learner. With the information gained from careful studies of plant anatomy and plant processes the student should be able to fill in the missing details of a general- ized drawing and to interpret properly the diagrammatic features of the figure. This being possible, a diagram of the kind submitted herewith should be exceedingly helpful and, indeed, illuminating. It was solely because of the success of these methods in this depart- ment that I was led to publish these brief notes and the diagram in the hope that they might be suggestive in some degree to my fellow workers in biological fields. The figure as published here has been revised and redrawn from a similar figure published in 1914 by the writer in a labora- tory manual of plant physiology. The older diagram was later enlarged and worked out in the form of a wall chart. The reader will understand, of course, as he looks at this diagram that the relative proportions of the various structures exhibited are not intended to be represented at all as they actually occur in the living plant. In fact the proportions are mostly so unnatural as to be grotesque and even misleading if the student or reader does not understand how to interpret them in the light of what has been said in the above paragraphs. He is supposed to have acquired this understanding in his courses of study dealing with the plant. The figure merely helps him to see the imterrelations of the facts of his- tology and physiology graphically summarized in the features of the chart. The chart represents in a more or less diagrammatic man- ner an epitome of the great facts of histology and physiology. Many additional entries might be made upon the chart, but the danger is in so multiplying details that the real purpose of the sketch may be obscured behind the maze of unessential details. That would be a serious blunder in the use of this method of teaching or learning. I believe that it is one of the chief duties of a teacher to epi- tomize very carefully his subject as fully as possible by whatever 58 NOTES, REVIEWS, ETC. methods he may devise. In so far as he is successful in this prac- tice so far will the students in his classes carry away with them a definite and compact and possibly useful body of knowledge upon the subject taught. Such a chart as this has been found very useful in such an epitome, and the method in general is successful in application. Raymonp J. Poot, Pu. D. The University of Nebraska. A METHOD FOR MOUNTING ANATOMICAL PREPARATIONS FOR ; EXHIBITION Oftentimes students in comparative anatomy make excellent preparations which are worthy of preservation. But this is not done as a rule because of the trouble in mounting. A glass strip of just the right size to fit into the exhibition jar must be found. The preparation is with difficulty tied by thread to the glass plate. If one could only “pin” into glass! The following method is sug- gested as a solution. A mixture of hard paraffin, beeswax and lampblack is melted up and poured into a paper box cover about the size needed had a glass plate been used. The mixture in the cover should be between %4 and % inch deep. It should be allowed to cool somewhat and then on this bed the preparation should be placed and pressed down into it somewhat. A few small pins can easily be made to fasten it securely. When the matrix is cooled they can be clipped off on the back. Labels can also be easily attached to parts of the dissection. The entire cover can now be placed in cold water for a few minutes. When hardened the cover can be cut away with a knife—the paraffin background cut down to just the size that will fit into the glass jar—care being taken to make it fit in snugly. The jar can now be filled with formalin and the cover fastened on. The black background makes the objects stand out distinctly and the preparation never becomes loosened from its wax bed. The whole operation takes but a few minutes time. G. Gi Scorn Department of Biology, College of the City of New York. AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY 59 GREEN LIGHT FOR DEMONSTRATING LIVING CESTODE OVA By projecting the light from a small arc through two screens, one of Picric Acid yellow and one of Methyl Blue blue, a green light was obtained which gave a peculiarly sharp definition to the details of living Cestode ova. The eggs were studied on a slide under either low or high power. This light has been used in connection with the demonstration of the eggs of Dipylidium ca- ninum, Tenia crassicollis and Hymenolepis nana. The color screens were prepared by staining lantern slide plates, after dissolving out the silver with Hypo from the unexposed plate, in either a weak solution of Picric acid or Methyl Blue. In each case the film was stained until it showed a distinct color when washed in water. University of Colorado. M. M. ELtIs. A NEW METHOD OF STAINING TISSUES CONTAINING NERVES Captain Sydney M. Cone, M. D. (J. Am. Med. Assn., Jan. 19, 1918) proposes the following method for nerves, which he says is excellent in bringing out axis cylinder and medullary sheaths, being approached only by Bielschowsky’s Axis Cylinder stain. The latter requires days, and does not give contrast staining. (1) Harden in 4% formaldehyde for 6 days; (2) carry thru graded alcohols to ether and absolute alcohol; (3) embed in cel- loidin and cut 10-20 microns, washing in water; (4) stain 15 min- utes in carbol fuchsin, washing rapidly in water; (5) place in 1% osmic acid 5 minutes; (6) wash rapidly, and stain for 1 minute in 50% aqueous solution of safranin; (7) place in 1% acid alcohol 1 minute; and in 95% alcohol for 2 minutes; (8) place in absolute alcohol and clove oil alternately until sections appear deep pink and translucent; (9) place in xylene 2 minutes, and mount in Canada balsam. Paraffin sections sometimes stain fairly well, but it is not safe, as xylene used to remove the paraffin before staining interferes with the process. The formaldehyde hardening is essential for the success of the stain. [I wonder whether terpineol could not be used here, or berga- mot, or naphtha, or even toluol. It would be a good thing if labora- 60 NOTES, REVIEWS, ETC. tory workers would give the newer results for clearing agents that do not decolorize stains, used after imbedding in (a) celloidin or parlodion, or (b) paraffin.—V. A. Latuam, Abstractor.] FONTANA’S SPIROCHETE STAIN Fontana’s method of staining spirochetes involves the use of the following preparations:—1l. Fixing fluid: acetic acid, 1 c.c.; formalin, 20 c.c.; distilled water, 100 cc. 2. Mordant: tannic acid, 5 gm.; phenol solution (1 per cent), 100c.c. 3. Silver solution: Prepare a 0.25 per cent solution of nitrate of silver, which may be done with sufficient accuracy by dissolving a small crystal in half a test tube of distilled water and adding just enough ammonia solu- tion to cause a slight permanent turbidity. 4. Distilled water. 3. Process: Prepare the slide to be stained by spreading the material from the syphilitic lesion very thinly on a clean slide, allow- ing to dry spontaneously ; fix by pouring on the fixing fluid, pouring it off after a few seconds. Renew immediately, and perform this process several times. The total duration of this stage should be not less than a minute. Wash well in distilled water, flood with the mordant, apply gentle heat until steam arises, and allow the process to continue for half a minute; wash thoroughly in distilled water (15 to 30 seconds), flood with the silver solution, again warm gently for half a minute, wash, blot and dry. Mount in balsam for per- manent specimens. The spirochetes are stained jet black, and appear larger than when stained by ordinary methods. Cedar oil causes the spirochetes to pale. Vi AL SIMPLE METHOD OF CLEANING OLD USED SLIDES Johnson (J. Am. Med. A., Dec. 8, 1917) suggests soaking slides indefinitely (24 hours at least) in full strength commercial (house- hold) ammonia, followed by rinsing with water and wiping clean. Stained smears of all kinds, immersion oil, balsam mounts are equally well cleaned. The same supply may be used repeatedly if kept in tightly closed receptacle. V.-AL UE: MENTHOL FOR NARCOTIZING Don’t forget that menthol is an effective reagent in narcotizing or anzsthetizing lower forms of life such as Rotifers, Infusoria, or even small crustacea. Vo Aris AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY 61 FRESH WATER BIOLOGY Teachers in America have been eagerly awaiting this volume for several years. The knowledge of the plans of the editors and publishers, including as they have the collaboration of a large num- ber of active biologists, has inevitably become wide spread. The need of such a work, planned on a scale that would be at once liberal and feasible, has been so genuine that it was assured in advance of a very wide use among teachers and working biologists. The unanimous verdict will be that every reasonable expecta- tion has been met by Professors Ward and Whipple and their helpers, in spite of the fact that the delays inevitable in getting such a synthetic task before the public will cause many of the contributors themselves to feel the need of revising their work by the time of its first appearance. All teachers of Biology, all advanced students of any group, all amateurs who use the micro- scope on living things, will find “Fresh Water Biology” a necessary part of their equipment. The volume is, in many ways, very close to the kind of work which has long been fostered and advanced by the American Micro- scopical Society and its Transactions. An organized interest in limnological work was manifest as early as 1899, at which meeting a Limnological Commission, consisting of Professors Birge, Eigen- mann, Kofoid, Ward and Whipple, was appointed to “unify, extend, and stimulate limnological work in this country.” The following year this Commission made a report which anticipated much of the ecological work done since with the fresh-water forms of this country, and unquestionably gave inspiration and impetus to the studies on which this book is based. While the volume cannot be listed among the annual “Transactions” of the Society, certain it is that much of the contributory work leading to this fine showing in American fresh-water Biology has been done by members of this Society and published in one form or another in its Transac- tions. So close is this enterprize to what this Society has been encour- aging in every possible way for many years, that the pages of the Transactions are now freely offered the editor and collaborators, 62 NOTES, REVIEWS, ETC. pending new editions of the book, for such supplementary and revisional statements as may be necessary from time to time to keep the accounts and keys of the various groups up to date. Such a cooperative arrangement would contribute greatly both to the convenience of our membership and to the most effective use of this manual. The work is much too compendious and condensed to allow an adequate statement even of its scope, much less to bring to our readers any of its specific contents. In general the material pre- sented is to be classified under three headings: (1) General dis- cussion of the conditions of life and of the effective study of organ- isms; (2) the biological conditions, method of collection, culture and preservation of the special groups; and (3) systematic keys, with descriptions and illustrations of the classes, orders, families, genera, and representative American species of the groups treated. Under the first head may be included the introductory chapter by Professor Ward, the chapter on “Conditions of Existence” by Professor Shelford, on “Methods of Collecting and Photograph- ing” by Professor Rieghard, and the concluding chapter by Pro- fessor Whipple on ‘“‘Technical and Sanitary Problems,” as related to fresh waters. The biological features of the special groups are treated at the beginning of the appropriate chapters. The chap- ters on Bacteria, Larger Aquatic Vegetation, and Aquatic Verte- brates are confined to this aspect, making no effort at systematic display. The following experts furnish the systematic chapters: Ed- gar W. Olive, Blue-green Alge; Julia W. Snow, Other Fresh Water Alge; C. H. Edmondson, Amceboid Protozoa; H. W. Conn and C. H. Edmondson, Flagellate and Ciliate Protozoa; Edward Potts, The Sponges; Frank Smith, Hydra and Other Fresh Water Hydrozoa; Caroline E. Stringer, The Free-living Flatworms ; Henry B. Ward, Parasitic Flatworms; Wesley R. Coe, The Nemerteans; N. A. Cobb, Free-living Nematodes; H. B. Ward, Parasitic Round- worms; H. S. Jennings, The Wheel Animalcules; H. B. Ward, Gastrotricha; Frank Smith, Aquatic Chetopods; J. Percy Moore, The Leeches; A. S. Pearse, The Fairy Shrimps; E. A. Birge, The AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY 63 Water Fleas; C. Dwight Marsh, Copepoda; R. W. Sharpe, Ostra- coda; A. E. Ortman, Higher Crustaceans; R. H. Wolcott, The Water Mites; James G. Needham, Aquatic Insects; Charles B. Davenport, Moss Animalcules; Bryant Walker, The Mollusca. Two devices in the arrangement of the systematic matter call for comment. The guide numbers in the artificial keys are arranged in accordance with a plan developed by Professors Forbes and Smith at the University of Illinois. Each guide line begins with a number. In addition to its own appropriate number which leads, there follows in parentheses the alternative number (or numbers) which indicates the contrasted line to which the seeker must go if that particular legend is not diagnostic. This is true both of the earlier and the later guide lines in a given series. If a given key line is acceptable the further guiding number is at the close of the line. The device thus gives a perfect system of cross references both forward and backward between categories of a given grade. This is unnecessary in brief keys; but where there are scores of intervening subordinate categories it is a great convenience. The name and description of a species, all the supplementary biological facts concerning it and the illustration are included in a solid panel between its own key line and the next. This gives a convenient compactness which is very satisfying. The general impression which follows examination of the book is the perfectly enormous amount of material condensed into its somewhat more than 1000 pages. This means, of course, great brevity, and yet no one interested in these groups can feel that the interesting and important matter has been left out. To one whose studies are confined largely to a single group there must come a renewed and enlarged sense of the representative character of the fresh-water organisms. One has brought home to him also the vast incompleteness of our records of the American distribution of even the better known fresh-water species. It ought to be pos- sible in connection with the extended use and further revision of such a work as this to get a better account of specific range in this country. It seems ungenerous to mention slight imperfections where so much has been brought to our aid. However, the appearance 64 NOTES, REVIEWS, ETC. of the chapters on Protozoa and Oligochztes is marred by the use of occasional cuts too heavy and opaque to give any true idea of the delicacy of the organisms. Figure 982 of Chetogaster is an example of this. A list of important references, in no case purporting to be a complete bibliography, concludes each chapter. An adequate index, including important descriptive terms and all of the scientific names used in the keys, concludes the book. Fresh Water Biology, by Henry B. Ward and G. C. Whipple, with a staff of Specialists collaborating. Pages ix and 1111, with 1547 text figures. John Wiley and Sons, New York and London, 1918. Price, $6.00. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE Nothing which has come to the attention of the reviewer puts more convincingly the meaning of the history of science than the preface of this little book by Professor Libby. “The history of science has something to offer to the humblest intelligence. It is a means of imparting a knowledge of scientific facts and principles to unschooled minds. “The history of science is an aid in scientific research. It places the student in the current of scientific thought, and gives him a clue to the purpose and necessity of the theories he is required to master. It presents science as the constant pursuit of truth rather than the formulation of truth long since revealed; it shows science as progressive rather than fixed, dynamic rather than static, a growth to which each may contribute. “It is only by teaching the sciences in their historical develop- ment that the schools can be true to the two principles of modern education, that the sciences should occupy the foremost place in the curriculum and that the individual mind in its evolution should rehearse the history of civilization. “The history of science should be given larger place than at present in general history. History of science studies the past for the sake of the future. It is a story of continuous progress. It is rich in biographical material. It shows the sciences in their interrelations, and saves the student from narrowness and pre- mature specialization. It affords a unique approach to the study AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY 65 of philosophy. It gives an interest in the applications of knowledge, offers a clue to the complex civilization of the present, and renders the mind hospitable to new discoveries and inventions. “The history of science is hostile to the spirit of caste. It reveals men of all grades of intelligence and of all social ranks co-operating in the cause of human progress. It is a basis of intel- lectual and social homogeneity. “Science is international,—English, Germans, French, Italians, Russians—all nations—contributing to advance the general interests. [The teaching of it] cannot fail to enhance in the breast of every young man or woman faith in human progress and good will to all mankind.” In method, this introduction takes up certain great scientific relations and applications, and treats these largely in connection with the personality of the men who have contributed their solu- tions. Some of the graphic chapter headings will carry the sug- gestion of method and of content:—1. Science and Practical Needs —Egypt and Babylonia; 2. Influence of Abstract Thought—Greece: Aristotle ; 3. Scientific Theory Subordinated to Application—Rome: Vitruvius; 4. The Continunity of Science—the Medieval Church and the Arabs; 6. Scientific Method; 7. Science as measurement; 8. Cooperation in Science; 9. Science and the Struggle for Lib- erty; 10. Interaction of all the Sciences; 11. Science and Religion; 12. Reign of Law; 14. Scientific Prediction; 16. Science and War; 17. Science and Invention; 19. The Scientific Imagination; 20. Science and Democratic Culture. The presentation is simple, direct, vivid, untechnical, and well suited to the intelligent reader with general interests. An Introduction to the History of Science, by Walter Libby. [Illustrated; 288 pages. Houghton, Mifflin Company, Boston, 1917. Price, $1.50, postpaid. A SHORT HISTORY OF SCIENCE Evidently the stay and the work of M. Sarton in this country is helping create an atmosphere in which we may prophesy an exten- sion of interest in the history of science. In this atmosphere our own American teachers, who have been doing something in this field for their students, are being encouraged to bring their work to the 66 NOTES, REVIEWS, ETC. more general audience. All this is very much worth while and will stimulate the giving of similar courses in many of our schools and colleges, both to culture the general student and to unify the scien- tific consciousness of the student of science. The book under review is by Professors Sedgwick and Tyler and embodies very largely the well known course of lectures on the subject begun by the senior author in Massachusetts Institute of Technology more than twenty-five years ago. The purpose is expressed by the authors thus,—“To furnish a broad general per- spective of the evolution of science, to broaden and deepen the range of the students’ interests, and to encourage the practise of discriminating scientific reading, . . . by furnishing the student and the general reader with a concise account of the origin of that scientific knowledge and that scientific method which, especially within the last century, have come to have so important a share in shaping the conditions and directing the activities of human life.” The general treatment is broadly chronological and geographic, —following the origin and rise of the wonderfully varied civiliza- tions of the near-Mediterranean peoples and their distinctive marks upon the progress of knowledge, of its applications, and of the method and spirit which its right pursuit demands of its followers. The chapter headings indicate this phase of the treatment: Early Civilizations; Early Mathematical Science in Babylonia and Egypt; Beginnings of Science; Science in the Golden Age of Greece; Greek Science in Alexandria ; Decline of Alexandrian Science; The Roman World,—The Dark Ages; Hindu and Arabian Science; Progress to 1450 A. D.; A New Astronomy and the Beginnings of Modern Natural Science ; Mathematics and Mechanics in the Sixteenth Cen- tury; Natural and Physical Science in the Seventeenth Century ; Beginnings of Modern Mathematical Science; Science in the Eigh- teenth Century; Modern Tendencies in Mathematical Science; Ad- vances in Science in the Nineteenth Century. Within these general headings, further analysis and presenta- tion are based upon a combination of biography, the rise and solu- tion of problems, and the discovery of the principles which have proved significant and fruitful. Topics like the following raise the expectations of the reader and indicate the emphasis: Primitive AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY 67 Interpretations of Nature; Astrology; Primitive Counting and Geometry ; Mathematics in Egypt; the Calendar and Measurements of Time; Greek Mathematics; Pythagoras; Beginnings of Rational Medicine; the Hippocrates; the Sophists; Circle Measurements ; Aristotle; Euclid; Archimedes; Earth Measurements; Beginnings of Human Anatomy; Mathematics and Astronomy at Alexandria; Ptolemy ; Hindu Astronomy; Arabian Contributions to Mathematics and Astronomy; Renaissance and Sciences ; Alchemy ; the Compass ; Clocks; Textiles; Printing; the New Astronomy,—Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Kepler, Galileo; Medicine and Chemistry, Anatomy ; Vesalius ; Higher Algebraic Equations and Symbolic Algebra; Gre- gorian Calendar; Harvey and Blood Circulation; Studies of the Atmosphere, Barometer, gases; Phlogiston; Beginnings of Chem- istry ; Bacon and Descartes; and thus on to the great wave of mathe- matical and natural science discoveries of the eighteenth and nine- teenth centuries which cannot even be enumerated here. The book is enlivened thruout by appropriate quotations from the men who did the work and from appreciative commentators on that work. In a series of appendices are more lengthy documents, —as, the oath of Hippocrates, Dedications by Copernicus and Har- vey, Gallileo before the Inquisition, and the like. Appendix I enumerates and discusses briefly some leading inventions of the last two centuries. The volume closes with a table of the important dates in the history of science and of civilization, a brief list of reference books, and an index. Each chapter closes with a list of references. The book is attractively made up and printed. A Short History of Science, by Sedgwick and Tyler. Illustrated, 474 pages. The Macmillan Co., New York, 1917. Price, $3.50. BIOCHEMICAL CATALYSTS IN LIFE AND INDUSTRY This volume discusses only the proteolytic enzymes, being the second volume by the author on enzymes and their uses. A pre- liminary chapter discusses the nature of the transformations that take place in the living cell, the inorganic catalysts, the biochemical catalysts, the theories as to their mode of operation, and a classifi- cation of proteolytic enzymes based on the number of molecules of 68 NOTES, REVIEWS, ETC. water they are capable of fixing in a molecule of albumin. Follow- ing Schutzenberger’s conception of the structure of the polypeptide molecule, the author presents a very attractive and cogent statement of the mechanism of progressive hydrolysis of these molecules under ferment action. The general discussion proceeds under these heads:—The Coagulating Catalysts,—thrombin, myosinase, and rennet; Pepsin; Trypsin, both pancreatic and from various animal and vegetable sources; Erepsins, including those secreted in the intestines, the poorly defined peptolytic enzymes which act on so-called peptones, nucleases which transform the phosphoric nucleo-proteins, argin- ase, and a small group of creatin-destroying catalysts; and the Amz- dases, the group of enzymes which aid in the final decomposition of the amino-acids,—the last stages of the reduction of the protein molecule before assimilation or excretion. The statement of the nature, origin, mode of isolation, prop- erties, and physiological role of these vital substances is extremely lucid, and meets the need of the general biologist who has not the opportunity to keep abreast with the more technical aspects of this department of biochemistry. Most general readers will be especially attracted to Part VI, which deals with the applications of these organized catalysts to medicine and industry, together with the grounds upon which such applications are possible. The author traces the use and abuses of pepsin in therapeutics, and progress made in standardizing tests of its efficiency both as to dissolving and in actual peptonizing power. Reference is made to peptones, both peptic and pancreatic, offered as an easily assimilable diet for greatly debilitated patients. Sim- ilar preparations are used in making culture broths in bacteriolog- ical laboratories. In a similar way diagnosis of stomach states is made by analysis of the gastric contents at different stages of test meals, with a view to obtaining the amount of chemical change, the acidity, and the enzymic contents. The author holds that the disrepute into which this determination has fallen is due to poor methods of application rather than to any fault of the principle itself. In preservation and use of grains and flours native proteolytic AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY 69 enzymes, and those produced by micro-organisms on the surface of the grains or placed in the flour purposely, bring changes that must be considered. So in brewing and in grain distillation, these biological catalysts play an essential role. The same processes are seen in the milk ferments and in the ripening of cheeses. In the latter some of the enzymes are native to the milk, some are pro- duced by micro-organisms, and rennet is added artificially. There is an interesting discussion of the relation of the pro- teolytic milk ferments to intestinal putrefaction. The writer him- self has done work with the Bulgarian ferment, and his views as to the cause of the benevolent intestinal action of the various clotted milks are contrasted with those of Metchnikoff and others. Other topics discussed are :—putrefaction, enzymes operative in tanning, biocatalysts of the soil, assimilation of atmospheric nitro- gen, fertilizers, recovery of nitrogenous wastes, and artificial nitro- genous foods. As the outcome, largely, of his own experiments the author sums up his conclusions in respect to the last item thus:—“It ap- pears that there is ample proof that the organism draws all its nitrogenous constituents from the hydrolysis of proteins. These may result either from the actual process of digestion, or from artificial means, like the action in vitro of proteolytic enzymes or the action of concentrated acids. In all events, these [artificially reduced nitrogen molecules] are directly assimilable substances and should be considered as food materials of great nutritive value. In fact, it has been established that a mixture of amino-acids, containing qualitatively and quantitatively all the principal products of the complete hydrolysis of proteins, can replace the albuminoid foods, and as such maintain the animal organism in nitrogenous equilibrium.” The writer is convinced that nutrition can ultimately be effected more economically and rationally by the substitution of some of these artificially produced nitrogenous foods for the com- plex natural ones, such as meat. Each chapter is followed by a bibliography ; and an index closes the book. The mechanical part is well done. Biochemical Catalysts in Life and Industry, by Jean Effront. Translated by Samuel C. Prescott, 752 pages. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1918. Price, $5.00, postpaid. PROCEEDINGS of the American Microscopical Society MINUTES OF THE PITTSBURG MEETING The thirty-sixth annual meeting of the American Microscopical Society was held in affiliation with the A. A. A. S. at Pittsburg, Pa., Dec. 29, 1917. In the absence of President Guyer, Vice-President Griffin acted as chairman. The report of the Custodian was presented and was accepted, ordered printed and referred for audit to a committee consisting of Professor Grif- fin and any other Pittsburg members whom he might select. The Treasurer’s report for the years 1916 and 1917 was accepted and referred to an auditing committee consisting of Drs. Latham and McCalla of Chicago. The Society approved the recommendation of the Treasurer that the fiscal year be regarded as extending from Dec. 1 to Nov. 30. The following officers were duly nominated and elected for the con- stitutional periods: President, Professor L. E. Griffin, University of Pitts- burg; First Vice-President, Dr. H. M. Whelpley, St. Louis; Second Vice- President, Professor C. O. Esterly, Occidental College; Secretary, T. W. Galloway, Beloit College (for two years); Custodian, Magnus Pflaum, Esq. In connection with the re-election of Mr. Pflaum it was noted that he has been custodian for eighteen years continuously since the formation of the office, having been Treasurer for three years before. A cordial vote of appreciation was extended him for this long and efficient service. Professor Max M. Ellis of University of Colorado and Professor J. E. Ackert of Kansas State Agricultural College were chosen as the elective members of the Executive Committee for 1918. Professors Grifin and Galloway were appointed a committee to approve and print the minutes. Adjourned. T. W. Gatitoway, Secretary. 72 MINUTES SPENCER-TOLLES FUND Custodian’s Report for the Years 1916 and 1917 Amount reported in TG soi cide eee oe eee $4489.32 Sane Oly 1916) Dividends ee ioe Tay aia $ 134.67 ely) 45 1SIG: SDivademasnite s). ade sais tet rordina we ties Miele eee 138.69 Pec.) 6, 1916: (Salei pti ransactions :))s ))s/.6 bonis eaaicexeene 60.00 Bec:/15, 1916) Sale jor Mransactions 3.024 issn fee emote 60.00 CU ST TOG. So vaAeTES Hs) lee 6 Sys cis Wis ccioere ulead wivwele etree 142.86 536.22 $5025.54 etl ds OL7 A ONVIGEMUS Cen RU Wl tno menhe Gesu a ralg $ 150.75 PCOS HADET. EMVIGEMES ) le odie ois Netemieiniojctetale eee cetes aieereee 155.28 306.03 $5331.57 GRAND TOTALS AU CONETIBUHORS ae ite Nieisd Sa uitlo miaalie eis a eee a dwrmcaiereere $ 800.27 ATE Sales Of TransSactecarsy ye ee Ne te ate le 878.38 ATE Te KMEmbEnSHigs eee snot s cet ole ole eemretel aie tele lee 300.00 AMD Taterest and (Dividends' (253.0. sess assay ein oe ecient 3542.92 $5521.57 LESS PAU MaraMIPS eee. iota el wa mbliclen teldian vad cheisiets eke ale muntomtetetm mete $ 150.00 WlbyDites on) tafe ‘Members tick. ocias oc ce sae cae cule wits 40.00 190.00 $5331.57 Life Members: (Robert Brown, dec’d); J. Stanford Brown; Seth Bunker Capp; Henry B. Duncanson; A. H. Elliott; John Hately. Contributors of $50 and over: John Aspinwall; Iron City Microscop- ical Society; Magnus Pflaum; Troy Scientific Society. Macnus Prraum, Custodian. Pittsburgh, Pa., Dec. 29, 1917. We, the undersigned committee, hereby certify that we have carefully examined the above account for the years 1916 and 1917 and found the same correct. L. E. Grirrin, Chm. Auditing Committee. MINUTES : 73 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TREASURER OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY December 24, 1915, to December 24, 1916 RECEIPTS Bates on, band)tromy TODS i oe Ae aU crt) er et $ 476.65 Merabershigi QUES: | sos oe s.2 ai ce Re AEROS Pe AAR EEE Ur 532.10 LGREESEE NB LG S15 ex stop NA UE Rees DIG Br cay Pies NE Le Ns AN ae nN IR OS ae a 129.00 STI SC DCL Space erat Feat tene aS RUA a Epa a lhe as ayreria an equ uN Enh Sma a 302.20 Salesvo fee DEATISACHONS a Va seer alee ical eae chat ieraih cpa nia atsaees Sieitepall 150.40 RAV CEEISEE Sie Meee ats eee ene tee Nene Ete Le oy aL) Mtn ata aaa toreta 184.90 MEAGRE nei S ok Aha Sata eer ra GTA «ele chaser erate: Se tahets hoa 2.68 SEAR CEEIDES At Mer Ae Rael ye ce A wh sie oa ieee Neca ate $1777.93 EXPENDITURES Prntine Transactions, volume 34, nov 4. o0.06 vcd ios cece samiiees $ 269.28 Proatine Transactions, volume 35, nos). 1,:2, and. 3)... fi.5.05.. 2609s 592.13 Biates or wransactions) volume) o4, Om 48 eas ose niia ainemeienic 8.91 Plates for Transactions, volume 35, nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 (in part).... 74.92 PMMESRENS MICH ATEC ETEIRE cr ooo ists Wiel es eae titers Ee uae ene ae She ee 37.00 Office expenses; stenography, supplies, etc.— SSE CE CEE Wine sch eters ta coc Sica teas aCe aoe = are eC tS ce ee eee era 134.59 BER E ASE MER 8 oil Ue Lech, AY eheea ia SE Ue gO Lone SSeS 26.70 Postage and express— CS ECSUTLE 9 5 pr NRE MERE oe UL A ea UR NC Pr REP BT 2 SR St ah 109.78 TISRERVE BN eS GS aetna ie EE A Ee nt RU VON eRe i. ct FPR 31.90 Ra ated E ALISACTIONS) iaig(s nosed at en ne eae ee eae he pee 16.16 Spencer-Tolles Fund from sales of sets of Transactions to U. of Pa. ANGTEOS NOEs Dames Ue oe aceaaan rd beth st UL e anes Sethe mS 120.00 Pixchase. of partial:'sets’of Fransactions, 2.56 ose. uae eee ce 45.50 Expenses of Secretary at Columbus meeting, 1915................... 31.65 SVEST EAA Be eh NPE RY iP lW SRA aS e a LEN ACEO Och ALOR A 5.70 woe. Eheaes Tae tell 231 imate PB ante SR ih Cpe AA ce CAN PO Rae SE 273.71 $1777.93 Respectfully submitted, H. J. Van CLeAvE, Treasurer. Feb. 15, 1918. We hereby certify this statement corresponds with the Treasurer’s book. V. A. LatHaM, GEORGE Epwarp FELL, Auditing Committee. 74 MINUTES ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TREASURER OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY For the year beginning Dec. 25, 1916, and ending Dec. 21, 1917 RECEIPTS Balance on hand ‘from 1916. 0/0/20. Sarees at eee eee ee $ 273.71 Membership iGUesie rari sie nate vss es ele Ae ANCL a ss Seed at a 880.00 MIEIATION s TEES it artite ct Cates isisle eos oes yar e e cle a means Caan ane a ee 42.00 BSISGTIDELS OAR hee ep con ake dice Sic shatters tie Sieieiu oho Me wld eine Ea aa 119.80 MIIGUOE SL TARSACTIONIS. ollctslosciatass ito Bele de ak hhc coe elas et ae 174.00 DROLET RISET SNe Casey eh RCo gece See tl Ul UR tel a 435.00 Partial mavinentutor Cuts, 2. ccc cee sand) ion Sabe vei cas cine oa ee eee 23.14 MRIEAN CVERENPES ei eitcin es otan Galstad eels bie wrens eater blo son gt ne $1947.65 EXPENDITURES Printing) transactions. -voOlime (5. t10.04 s mntoesa sae aes aml oe eee $ 259.28 Prntine Transactions, volume 36, nos; 1,:2,'and 3 2)..4.....0 Gaon 543.74 Pistes) tor ylransactions volime roo slOn adore ceiciae eis cists sitters ieee 29.64 Phites) tor) Transactions, volunie 36, nos. 1) 2) 3; 49.5... =. se eee 78.35 Postace arid iepressy ak ole iss etic cheeks okeniss Wid ns oe teen ae ree 75.42 Office expenses— SS ECTELAEY |)’ aes c chon araie ecb gS wide e ocala oleh do oun sn ee eR ance atin aie ee eno 73.37 PTCASHEET ee veal Othe eek iced wi ttemaeeinilove aie GEC ene serch e ieee ea 32.26 In part payment of Secretary’s expenses to Pittsburg meeting...... 50.00 Binding set’ of; 0 ransactions fOr Sale’. cic eicisie eters sole wists) ng sporocyst-> cercaria- > distomulum- >adult distome or with heavy redia tail and eye-spots See = veer. in snail in insect in fresh water or fishes (exception- crustacean ally in other ver- _ tebrates) IMPORTANT REFERENCES Blanchard, R. 1891. Notices Helminthologiques. Mem. Soc. zool., France, 4:420-489; 38 figs. Braun, M. 1900. Trematoden der Chiroptera. Ann. d. K. K. Naturhist. Hof-mus., 15; 217-236; 1 Taf. Cooper, A. R. 1915. Trematodes from Marine and Fresh-Water Fishes. Trans. R. Soc. Canada, (3)9:181-205; 3 pl. Linton, E. 1893. On Fish Entozoa from Yellowstone National Park. Rept. U. S. Com. of Fish and Fisheries, 1889-1891 :545-564; 5 pl. 1898. Trematode Parasites of Fishes. Proc. Nat. Mus., 20:507-548; 15 pl. 1901. Parasites of Fishes of the Woods Hole Region. Bull. U. S. Fish Com. for 1899 :405-492; 34 pl. Looss, A. 1902. Ueber neue und bekannte Trematoden aus Seeschildkréten. Nebst Eréterungen zur Systematik und Nomenclatur. Zool. Jahrb., Syst., 16: 411-894; 12 Taf. Miiller, O. F. 1788. Zoologica danica. 4 vol.in 2. Havniae. 225 pp., 160 pl. Nicoll, Wm. 1909. Studies on the Structure and Classification of Digenetic Trematodes. Quar. Jour. Micr. Sci., n.s., 53:391-487; 2 pl. Odhner, T. 1905. Die Trematoden des Arktischen Gebietes. Fauna Arctica, 4:291-372; Subat. 1910. Nordostafrikanische Trematoden. Fascioliden. Results Swedish Zool. Exp., 1901. Stockholm. 170 pp.; 6 Taf. Olsson, P. 1876. Bidrag till Skandinaviens Helminthfauna. Stockholm. 35 pp.; 4 Taf. Osborn, H. L. 1903. Bunodera cornuta sp. nov.: a New Parasite from the Crayfish and Cer- tain Fishes of Lake Chautauqua, N. Y. Biol. Bull., 5:63-73; 7 figs. 198 E. C. FAUST Stafford, J. 1904. Trematodes from Canadian Fishes. 1. Zool. Anz., 27:481-495. Ward, H. B. 1894. On the Parasites of the Lake Fish. Proc. Am. Micr. Soc., 15:173-182, 1 pl. 1918. Parasitic Flatworms, in Ward and Whipple’s Fresh-Water Biology, 365- 453, 113 textfigs. Wedl, C. 1857. Anatomische Beobachtungen iiber Trematoden. Sitz. K. Akad. Wiss., Wien. Math.-naturwiss., 26:241-278, 4 Taf. . EXPLANATION OF FIGURES (Code ages ree hes: cirrus pouch Sy ee ee shell gland "Cotes rue eam cecum |B Le Nera anterior and posterior testes 56 ca Pea vitelline duct EUS Sart, ener ene uterus CEN neers egg Veet pax eet bation vitellaria Pe ware genital pore Vl, tna anaes vas deferens IL CS 2. eres Laurer’s canal VS nase seminal vesicle Oi das eae ovary Se Rien excretory bladder Die pharynx SLE eo ootype Bea eee receptaculum seminalis DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES PLATE XIV Stephanophiala farionis. 1.—Ventral view, X 54; 2.—lateral view of oral sucker and papillae, X 105; 3.—detail of portion of integument lateral to acetabulum, showing spines, X 180; 4.—egg, X 180. Stephanophiala vitelloba. 5.—Dorsal view, X 54; 6.—dorsal view of head, show- ing papillae, X 105; 7.—egg, X 240; 8.—detail of sex organs in region of ootype, X 180; 9.—cross section of worm just anterior to acetabulum, X 180; 10.—cross section thru ovary, X 180; 11.—cross section thru posterior testis, X 180; 12.—cross section thru region of ootype, X 180; 13.—detail of lateral papilla, X 180. PLATE XV Crepidostomum cornutum. 14.—Ventral view, X 34; 15.—detail of anterior end, X 24. Crepidostomum illinoiensis. 16.—Ventral view, X 105; 17.—detail of anterior end, ventral view, X 180; 18.—egg, X 330; 19.—diagram of lateral aspect, X 75. Acrolichanus petalosa. 20.—Ventral view, X 34; 21.—median sagittal section, X 34; 22.—detail of anterior end, X 24; 23.—egg, X 330; 24.—cross section thru region of genital pore, X 75; 25.—cross section thru region of ootype, X 75; 26.—cross sec- tion thru anterior testis, X 75; 27.—detail of genital organs, X 50; 28.—section thru lateral papilla, X 105; 29.—ventral view of young fluke, X 34. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY VOL. XXXVII 2 aa cae x HS) An 7 Beep D * h = SF > J 4 sy be y 3 me tz 4 : ts \ \t > Y eha\ \ Saris x) 5 PLATE XIV TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY VOL. XXXVII OL ay Be ASL iy S So an Se : i 2 — “7 ) ar = te aide. > WF (, aN ar hye x = o~ ats be x FAUST PLATE XV ie here Be a le ‘ By ly eee? ; : p ‘ a9) SINSYLSVA TA De Ea Noctk ht i fy eS erie -r J L% .4 mars AME z ey 6 P oS ae > y j i Mh we é | ea es te ie of ? Bi: wh ' « 4 i , 1 iy Nhe's 7 _ t ” \ ’ . 4 F ‘ ' * t . ’ * : ke. eo! a! ag “—< Walt ne Mik y ae sj * “ 4 | er “0 ; A hate . ; ” os 7 Lt . a q a” ai ‘ y ee 2 G ; * q 2 iy Lr os + ie a - 7 ; ae DEPARTMENT OF NOTES AND REVIEWS It is the purpose, in this department, to present from time to time brief original notes, both of methods of work and of results, by members of the Society. All mem- bers are invited to submit such items. In addition to these there will be given a few brief abstracts of recent work of more general interest to students and teachers. There will be no attempt to make these abstracts exhaustive. They will illustrate progress without attempting to define it, and will thus give to the teacher current illustrations, and to the isolated student suggestions of suitable fields of investigation.—[Editor.] AQUATIC MICROSCOPY To those of us who remember the first thrills of work with the micro- scope it is not easy to understand why there are not more amateur stu- dents of nature who cultivate a life interest in the microscope. Very much of the early enthusiasm of this Society was given to it by those who were using the microscope in amateur exploration of the marvels of nature. The American schools and colleges make much use of the microscope, but those who are most interested in these things tend to go on into the study of some more or less technical aspect of the subject. It would seem however, if our teaching were as effective and inspiring as it should be, that more of our students would thruout life continue an amateur interest in this charming field. Perhaps, as we grow older in America and achieve more leisure and more general interest in culture, we may again increase the number of those who untechnically use the microscope for the mere love of its interesting revelations. In England there are many such, and numerous simple handbooks have been issued which helpfully guide the beginner. Dr. Stokes has been a long-time exponent and writer for such students in this country. His little book, now in its fourth edition, has done its part to keep alive amateur interest. The author undertakes in the simplest and most concrete way possible to answer the questions of the embryo naturalist, such as:—‘How can I best find and collect the microscopic plants and animals? How can I tell them apart and deter- mine what they are and how they are named? What outfit will I need, and how can I prepare my material for profitable study?” These questions are answered in the following chapters: I, The Microscope and its Parts; II, Common Aquatic Plants Useful to the 200 AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY Microscopist; III, Desmids, Diatoms, and Fresh Water Algz; IV, Rhizo- pods; V, Infusoria; VI, Hydra; VII, Aquatic Worms (and Insect Larve); VIII, Rotifera; IX, Freshwater Polyzoa; X, Entomostraca and Phyllo- poda; XI, Water Mites and Water Bear. The especial virtues of the book are in its untechnical language, its simple descriptions, its concrete keys and synopses, and its outline draw- ings. The author states that, with the exception of a few western forms, every type of organism mentioned in the book was taken by him from a single pond in central New Jersey. Aside therefore from its value as a guide for the study of nature, it has a value as a contribution to intensive study of a limited locality. The same features which make it useful to the independent beginner will make the book helpful to the students of elementary Biology in high school and college, and stimulate to more effective field work. Aquatic Microscopy FOR BEGINNERS, by Alfred G. Stokes. Fourth edition, revised and enlarged; 324 pages, illustrated. John Wiley & Sons, New York and London. Price $2.25 net, postpaid. AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY 201 Albert McCalla, M.A., Ph.D., F.R.M.S., died suddenly of heart failure at 9:15 p.m., on Thursday, June 6th, 1918, at his late residence, 2316 Calumet Avenue, Chicago. He was 72 years of age and his demise came after more than a year of ill health. He was the son of Thomas McCalla, one of the first bankers of Chicago, and Marianne Davisson, and was the brother of the late Mary Ella McCalla. Of Scotch descent, he was of South Carolina and Virginia lineage. Mr. McCalla was much interested in scientific research and received a number of degrees. He was possessed of unusual expert ability with the microscope and was the inventor of an attachment widely used in days gone by. He graduated from the old Chicago High School and was the winner of the Foster Medal; graduated from Monmouth College; was one of the founders of Beta Theta Pi at the old Chicago University. He was a member of the following organizations: Fellow Royal Microscopical Society, London. Past-President American Microscopical Society. Past-President Llinois Microscopical Society. Member American Association for the Advancement of Science. Member First Presbyterian Church, Chicago. Member Sons of the Revolution. Member Beta Theta Pi Fraternity. He taught at Parsons College and later at Lake Forest College. He is survived by his wife, Eleanor Hamill McCalla, daughter of the late Honorable and Mrs. Smith Hamill, and four children, Helen Wayne McCalla, Thomas Clarendon McCalla, Major Lee A. McCalla, U.S. A., and Paul Hamill McCalla. TRANSACTIONS OF THE American Microscopical Society ORGANIZED 1878 INCORPORATED 1891 PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE SOCIETY EDITED BY THE SECRETARY T. W. GALLOWAY BELOIT, WISCONSIN VOLUME XXXVII NuMBER FouR Entered as Second-class Matter August 13, 1918, at the Post-office at Menasha, Wisconsin, under act of March 3, 1879. Acceptance for mailing at the special rate of postage provided for in Section 1103, of the Act of October 3, 1917, authorized Oct. 21, 1918 The Collegiate Press GrorcE BANTA PUBLISHING COMPANY MENASHA, WISCONSIN 1918 ee ee TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR VOLUME XXXVII, Number 4, 1918 A New Species of Rynchelmis in North America, with Plate XVI by F. Smith EAT el Wig BG Ml DT (ol SEES ee Me Nee SE Re ee Done Ss ea oe ED Ek Lr Development of the Wolffian Body in Sus Scrofa Domesticus, with Plate XVII FOP RER by bdward! |. Angles Ay Meo TD). s..cstcscss Saco see ne Variation in the Horizontal Distribution of Plankton in Devils Lake, North WOR Oba ab yy irik! Gx MODENE § 2ct.05- sesh orig et eee ee ee Notes and Reviews: Genetics in Relation to Agriculture (McGraw-Hill); Nitrate Cellulose as a Substitute for Celloidin, by Chas. H. Miller OFFICERS President?) Ts) is GRTRRIN ee ae el ate ie eee ee eee ee Pittsburg, Pa. First Vice-President? 1. Mi WRELPLEV 2 ios eee ee ee ee St. Louis, Mo. second Vice President: ‘C..O. HMsTemEw ON i es sale ee a Los Angeles, Cal. weer etary: Lai Wa GALLO WAN ates oles ue estes coer ere ee Beloit, Wis. Treasurer: TH. J. VAN CLBAVE 43.20.65. 3.0)don ene ee Urbana, Ill Custodian: MAGNUS (PFLAUM. Jo.ss.0icseot eee Se Meadville, Pa. EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Past Presidents Still Retaining Membership in the Society Smon Henry GAGE, B.S., of Ithaca, N.Y., : at Ithaca, N. Y., 1895 and 1906 A. CLIFFORD MERcER, M.D., F.R.M.S., of Syracuse, N. Y., at Pittsburg, Pa., 1896 A. M. Bere, M.D., of Columbus, Ohio, at New York City, 1900 C. H. E1GENMANN, Ph.D., of Bloomington, Ind., at Denver, Colo., 1901 E. A. BrrcE, LL.D., of Madison, Wis., at Winona Lake, Ind., 1903 Hnery B. Warp, A.M., Ph.D., of Urbana, IIl., at Sandusky, Ohio, 1905 HERBERT OsBorNn, M.S., of Columbus, Ohio, at Minneapolis, Minn., 1910 A. E. Hertzter, M.D., of Kansas City, Mo., at Washington, D. C., 1911 F. D. HEALD, Ph.D., of Pullman, Wash. at Cleveland, Ohio, 1912 CHARLES BROOKOVER, Ph.D., of Louisville, Ky., at Philadelphia, Pa., 1914 Cartes A. Korom, Ph.D., of Berkeley, Calif., at Columbus, Ohio, 1915 M. F. Guyver, Ph.D., of Madison, Wis., at Pittsburg, Pa., 1917 The Society does not hold itself responsible for the opinions expressed by members in its published Transactions unless endorsed by special vote. TRANSACTION OF ; American Microscopical Society (Published in Quarterly Instalments) Vol. XXXVII DECEMBER, 1918 No. 4 A NEW SPECIES OF RHYNCHELMIS IN NORTH AMERICA* F. Smit AND L. B. DIcKEY The worms described in this paper are part of a series of Oligochaeta obtained by Miss Bessie R. Green from the vicinity of Flathead Lake in Montana during the summer of 1914, while at the Biological Station maintained by the University of Montana. The Rhynchelmis speci- mens were collected in July by A. G. Vestal and M. J. Elrod, for whom the species is named, from a creek near the Station, and included several mature specimens and a number of immature ones. But two species and a variety of Rhynchelmis have previously been known. R. limosella Hoffmeister is a common European species, and the Asiatic species R. brachycephala and its variety bythia have been somewhat recently made known by Michaelsen (1901 and 1905). We now describe a distinct but somewhat closely related species from North America. A modification of the definition of the genus in a few characters is necessary, and a still closer relationship between Rhynchelmis and the North American genera Sutroa and Eclipidrilus becomes apparent. RHYNCHELMIS HOFFMEISTER Setae simple. Spermiducal pores paired on 10.f Oviducal pores paired in intersegmental groove 11/12. Spermathecal pores paired on 8. Longitudinal muscle layer completely separated into eight longitu- dinal bands. Transverse blood vessels, two pairs, in each of most somites. Spermaries and spermiducal funnels paired in 10, or two pairs in 9 and 10; sperm ducts, one or two pair, opening into a pair of long atria. Ovaries paired, in 11. Spermathecae paired, in 8, without diverticula opening into the spermathecal ducts, ampullae communicating with the alimentary tract. * Contributions from the Zoological Laboratory of the University of Illinois, No. 106. } Arabic numerals are used to designate the somites, counted from the anterior end. 208 SMITH AND DICKEY RHYNCHELMIS ELRODI SP. NOV. Length, 47-65 mm. Somites, 133-177. Proboscis long and slender. Setae closely paired. Clitellum on 9-17. Spermiducal, oviducal, and spermathecal pores nearly in seta line ab. Longitudinal muscle bands not spirally rolled at edges. Ventral vessel forked in 7, and connected with dorsal vessel in 1. First nephridia in 13. Spermaries paired, in 10. Spermiducal] funnels, one pair; sperm ducts, one pair, imbedded in the walls of the atria. Albumen glands lacking. Spermathecae, one pair in 8; communicating by ducts with the alimentary tract. From the mucky banks of a creek near the Biological Station at Flat- head Lake in western Montana. Holotype and paratypes in the collection of the senior author (Cat. No. 1058). The more important facts of structure were gained from the study of a series of sagittal sections of the 33 anterior somites of one specimen, and of two series of transverse sections from the anterior 18 somites of each of two other specimens, of which one is the type. EXTERNAL CHARACTERS Alcoholic specimens, apparently sexually mature, are 47-65 mm. in length, and 0.9-1.25 mm. in diameter in the region of the clitellum, where the diameter is greatest. In the anterior half of the worm the body is nearly circular in cross section, unlike other described species of Rhyn- chelmis, and elsewhere.it is not decidedly quadrilateral. In one appar- ently complete specimen, the number of somites is but 133, while in another it is 177. The number of somites in other specimens varies be- tween these extremes and approximates 150. The anterior part of the prostomium is prolonged into a slender tentacle-like proboscis. The setae are closely paired and the distances between the pairs are approxi- mately indicated by the formula; aa*:bc:dd=3:5:5. The setae are sig- moid, slightly more curved at the distal end, slender, and simple. The average length is about 0.27 mm., and the diameter at the nodulus is about 0.01 mm. The nodulus is at about one-third of the length of the seta from the distal end. The clitellum is developed on 9-17 and encroaches slightly on the adjacent somites. It is most strongly thickened on 10-16, and is devel- * Letters are used to designate the setae of either side of a somite, beginning with a for the most ventral one and proceeding in order to d for the most dorsal one. NEW SPECIES OF RYNCHELMIS IN NORTH AMERICA 209 oped ventrally as well as dorsally. The spermiducal pores are paired on 10, slightly anterior to 10/11, and nearly in line with the ventral setae, The oviducal pores are small, in 11/12, and in line with the ventral setae. The spermathecal pores are paired on 8, posterior to the ventral setae. INTERNAL CHARACTERS The brain lies dorsad of the mouth, in the first somite, and is similar in form to that of R. limosella, as figured by Vejdovsky (1876). The ventral nerve cord is closely adherent to the body wall throughout its length. The layer of longitudinal muscle fibers is in eight distinct bands, as in other species of the genus, but the edges of these bands are not rolled as in R. limosella (Vejdovsky, 1884, pl. 16, figs. 1 and 2), and in R. brachycephala and its variety, as described by Michaelsen (1905:62-63). The alimentary tract is simple in character, like that of the other species. The ventral vessel forks in 7 and the two anterior branches unite near the brain with the dorsal vessel. A pair of transverse vessels in the pos- terior part of each of somites 2-6, connect the dorsal vessel with the branches of the ventral; and similar transverse vessels in 7-12, connect the dorsal and ventral vessels. In one specimen there is a similar vessel on one side of 13.. The paired posterior transverse vessels of somites posterior to 12 are connected with the dorsal vessel only. They have a few caecal branches and often extend only part way down the sides of the body. There is a pair of transverse vessels in the anterior part of each of most somites posterior to 7. The first pair are somewhat shorter and more simple, but those of somites posterior to 8 extend to the ventral side and have several caecal branches. In the somites that have been examined, posterior to 12, each of these vessels is connected with the ventro-lateral wall of the intestine by a branch which extends obliquely dorsad and mesad from that part of the vessel lying in the ventro-lateral part of the body cavity. Ventro-intestinal vessels connect the ventral vessel with the ventro-median wall of the intestine (fig. 1). In somites 10 or 11 to 18 or 19 inclusive, these vessels, usually three in number, enter peculiar glandular bodies which are closely associated with the ventro- median wall of the intestine and correspond to the blutdriisen described by Michaelsen (1901:178) in R. brachycephala. These blood glands (fig. 1) are more intimately united with the wall of the intestine in R. elrodi than are those of the other species. 210 SMITH AND DICKEY In the specimens examined, the most anterior nephridia are in 13 or 14, and they are more or less irregularly distributed posteriorly. There are sometimes a pair in a somite, sometimes a single one, and often none at all. Just posterior to the septum which supports the nephridial fun- nel, there is an enlargement similar to that found in a considerable num- ber of other species of lumbriculids. The nephridiopores are in the line of the ventral seta bundles and a short distance anterior to them. There is but one pair of spermaries and they project freely into 10 from their attachment to the posterior face of 9/10. A pair of sperm sacs extend posteriorly on either side of the alimentary tract, from their openings in septum 10/11, at least as far as to somite 30, in some speci- mens. ‘The spermiducal organs are similar in their main features to those of other species of the genus; but there is no trace of more than one pair of sperm ducts or spermiducal funnels, and those present belong to somite 10. The funnels are on 10/11, below and laterad of the openings of the sperm sacs, and the dorsal edges of the funnels extend into the sacs, along their ventral wall for a short distance. In tracing each sperm duct from the funnel towards the external pore, we havea relatively slender duct which extends posteriorly through several somites in the cavity of the cor- responding sperm sac, to a position at which it enters the posterior end of a much larger and tubular atrium which extends anteriorly into 10 and then, bending ventrally, joins the body wall, posterior to the ventral setae, and opens to the exterior at the spermiducal pore. There is a general correspondence between the main features of the spermiducal organs, as outlined above, and those of the other species of the genus; but a more detailed study yields distinct differences, as will appear later. From the funnel the sperm duct first extends ventrad along the septum and then anteriad to the atrium which it follows closely to the place of their union. The duct and atrium are merely in contact in somite 10, but in the anterior part of the sperm sac the duct becomes more strongly flattened against the atrial wall, and about opposite 11/12, in the type specimen, it enters the tissue of the atrial wall (fig. 2, sd) and follows it to a point near the posterior end of the atrium, where duct and atrium merge and their cavities become continuous. ‘This intimate relation of duct and atrium is more like the condition found in certain species of Eclipidrilus than it is like that of the other species of Rhynchelmis. In the type specimen the atrium extends posteriorly to 15, and in the other sectioned specimens not so far. Numerous small glandular masses NEW SPECIES OF RYNCHELMIS IN NORTH AMERICA 211 or prostate glands which are much like those of other species of the genus, are attached to the outer surface of the atrium (fig. 2, pr). The ectal ends of the atria are apparently protrusible and may function as penial organs. In somite 9, in other species of Rhynchelmis, there are organs, either one or a pair, which are known by various names: albumen glands, Kopulationsdriisen, etc. There are no recognizable traces of such organs in R. elrodi. There is but one pair of ovaries and these are in 11 and are attached to the septum 10/11. The paired ovisacs extend posteriorly from 11/12 and closely invest the corresponding sperm sacs except where ova prevent. They extend through several somites posteziad of the sperm sacs. Paired oviducal funnels are on the anterior face of the septum 11/12, and the very short oviducts open to the exterior in the segmental groove 11/12 in line with the ventral setae. Paired spermathecae in 8, correspond closely with those of the other species of the genus. They open to the exterior posteriad of the ventral seta bundles of 8; the ducts are without diverticula; and the ampullae open through narrowed duct-like portions into the alimentary tract. In one specimen the spermathecae have no connection with the alimentary tract and the diameter of the lumen is much less than normal. This is probably due to degeneration, since the spermaries are small and apparently at a stage of inactivity and yet the sperm sacs are well distended with sperm cells. SYSTEMATIC RELATIONSHIPS The new species has important characters that ally it closely with the Eurasian species of Rhynchelmis, and others in which it is nearly related to Sutroa (Beddard, 1892; Eisen, 1888, 1891) and Eclipidrilus. The simple pointed setae, and much elongated atria are characters shared by all of them. In having an intervening somite between the spermathecal and atrial somites; in the communication between the spermathecae and the alimentary tract; and in the lack of differentiation of each atrium into a “sperm reservoir’ or “storage chamber” and a penial organ with narrowed connecting duct; it resembles the species of Rhynchelmis and Sutroa and differs from those of Eclipidrilus (Michaelsen, 1901:150; Smith, 1900:473). It is nearer to Rhynchelmis than to Sutroa, in having the spermathecae paired and without diverticula; but resembles the latter rather than the previously known species of the former, in having no atrial remnants (albumen glands) in somite 9. To the writers the rela- EM SMITH AND DICKEY tionships to Rhynchelmis seem more significant and they include it in that genus. One important difference between Rhynchelmis and Sutroa disappears when we find simple, paired spermathecae, and absence of atrial remnants in 9, characterizing the same species. It is interesting to note that the possibility of the existence of such a species of Rhyn- chelmis as R. elrodi has already been forecast by Michaelsen (1908:163). “Tch bin in meinen Betrachtungen dieser Reduktionsverhiltnisse dann noch einen Schritt weiter gegangen. Von Rhynchelmis brachy- cephala ausgehend, sagte ich mir, dass es kein morphologisch sehr bedeut- samer Vorgang sei, wenn nun die rudimentiren, Samentrichterlosen Samenleiter des vorderen Paares und die verlassenen, ihrer Hauptfunk- tion enthobenen Atrien des vorderen Paares ganz schwinden. Es wiirde dann ein Zustand des minnlichen Geschlechtsapparates eintreten, der mit dem urspriinglich einfachpaarigen Apparat durchaus iiberein- stimmte.”’ In R. limosella (fig. 3) there are two pair of spermaries and spermiducal funnels in 9 and 10, and two pair of sperm ducts joining the paired atria of 10. In 9 there are paired organs resembling atria but without the atrial function since no sperm ducts are connected with them. They are the “albumen glands” and presumably represent an additional pair of atria which in ancestors were joined by the sperm ducts connected with the spermiducal funnels of 9. In R. brachycephala (fig. 4) and its variety bythia, the spermaries and spermiducal funnels of 9 have disappeared and there is a partial disappearance of the related pair of sperm ducts, while the atrial organs of 9 are still represented. In R. elrodi (fig. 5) there is a complete disappearance of the reproductive organs of 9, and we have simply the single pairs of spermaries, spermiducal funnels, sperm ducts, and atria in 10. We also have a single pair of ovaries and of ovi- ducts which are in 11. The location of the single pair of spermathecae in R. elrodi, two somites anterior to the one containing the male organs, which would otherwise seem rather peculiar, is easily understood on the assumption that this species has been derived from ancestors similar to R. limosella._ In accordance with the views of Michaelsen, these in turn were presumably derived from Lamprodrilus-like ancestors in which each pair of sperm ducts had its own pair of atria independent of others. NEW SPECIES OF RYNCHELMIS IN NORTH AMERICA 213 LITERATURE CITED BEDDARD, F. E. 1892. A Contribution to the Anatomy of Sutroa. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 37 195-202. EISEN, GUSTAV. 1888. On the Anatomy of Sutroa rostrata, a New Annelid of the Family of Lum- briculina. Mem. California Acad. Sci., 2:1-8. 1891. Anatomical Notes on Sutroa alpestris, a New Lumbriculide Oligochete from Sierra Nevada, California. Zoe, 2:322-334. MICHAELSEN, W. 1901. Oligochaeten der Zoologischen Museen zu St. Petersburg und Kiew. Bull. Acad. Imp. Sci. St. Petersburg, (5), 15:137-215. 1905. Die Oligochaeten des Baikal-Sees. Wiss. Ergebn. Zool. Exped. Baikal- See, unter Leit. v. A. Korotneff. 1 Lief., pp. 1-68. 1908. Pendulations-Theorie und Oligochiten, zugleich eine Erérterung der Grundziige des Oligochiten-Systems. Mitt. Nat. Mus. Hamburg, 25: 153-175. SmiTH, F. 1900. Notes on Species of North American Oligochaeta. IV. Bull. Ill. State Lab. Nat. Hist., 5:459-478. VEJDOVSKY, FRANZ. 1876. Anatomische Studien an Rhynchelmis Limosella Hoffm. (Euaxes filiros- tris Grube). Zeit. f. wiss. Zool., 27:332-361. 1884. System und Morphologie der Oligochaeten. 166 pp., Prag. 214 SMITH AND DICKEY EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVI Fig. 1. Rkynchelmis elrodi. Transverse section through the posterior part of somite 17: int, intestine; bg. blood gland; vi, ventro-intestinal vessel; vv, ventral vessel; ss, sperm sacs. Fig. 2. The same. Transverse section through the atrium near the place of en- trance of the sperm duct: at, atrium; sd, sperm duct; pr, prostate glands; s, developing sperm cells. Semi-diagrammatic. Fig. 3. Rhynchelmis limosella. Diagram showing relations of the reproductive organs of one side: sy, spermary; sd, sperm duct; at, atrium; al, albumen gland; oy, ovary; od, oviduct; st, spermatheca. Fig. 4. Rhynchelmis brachycephala. Similar diagram: adapted from figure of Michaelsen (1901:179). Fig. 5. Rhynchelmis elrodi. Similar diagram. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY VOL. XXXVII PLATE XVI SMITH AND DICKEY DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 215 DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY IN SUS SCROFA DOMESTICUS Epwarp J. ANGLE, A.M.M.D. The results embodied in this paper are from studies undertaken some years ago. At that time it was realized that the investigation was far from complete and publication was delayed with the hope of further study—a hope never realized—of the source of origin of the several por- tions of the urinary tubules. In the light of recent research the publica- tion of the paper at this late date is largely that the illustrations may prove of some permanent value. HISTORICAL The Wolffian bodies (Corps de Wolff, Urniere, Mesonephros, Primi- tive Kidney) were discovered by Casper Fr. Wolff in the year 1759, who regarded them as representing the embryonic period of the true kidney (Metanephros). They received their present name from H. Rathke in 1825; this only applied to the Wolffian bodies of birds, as Rathke termed the same organs in mammals Okensche KGrper. In 1824 Jacobson intro- duced the name of primordialniere and discovered that in birds these bodies secreted uric acid, which was conducted away by the allantois. The first mention of the mesonephros in man was made by J. Frey Meckel (1809) in his work on comparative anatomy. Meckel describes in fairly accurate language the mesonephros of an embryo 1 mm. long; but evidently was in doubt as to what the organ was, as he later asks the question—“are these structures the common source from which lungs, liver, kidneys, adrenals and sexual organs later have their origin?” The older writers (Wrisberg, Dzondi, Oken, Emmert and Hochstetter) had many fanciful theories regarding the role of the Wolffian body, re- garding it either as the beginning of the kidney or as the horn of the utereus. Rathke (25) led the way to a true conception by discovering the origin of the true kidney in an embryo chick of six days and showed that the Wolffian body was related to the kidneys as the gills are to the lungs. The glomerulus of the mesonephros was discovered by J. Miiller (30). The honor is due Miiller for having first accurately and correctly followed the developmental changes of this organ in a large series of embryos. 216 ANGLE The smallest of Miiller’s embryos hada length of 20mm. In this embryo he describes the adrenals, which are quite large and covered by the true kidney, the kidney and ureter, the Wolffian bodies with their conducting sexual portions. The Wolffian body is described as a long flat organ which is in relation on its lateral surface with the sexual duct. Miiller emphasizes the fact of the early disappearance of the Wolffian body in man; for in his next embryo which was 3 cm. long he found between excretory duct and sexual gland (does not mention whether testes or ovary) a long spur which is the remaining trace of the Wolffian body. The chief merit of Miiller’s work consists in his having discovered the réle which the Wolfhan body plays in the development of the sexual ducts. Among the noted early investigators was Valentin (35) whose work principally relates to mammals. In the Wolffian body, Valentin distin- guished two portions; an outer half which consists only of canals and an inner portion made up principally of coiled vessles (Malpighian bodies). Valentin adds parenthetically that in spite of great pains it is frequently difficult to determine the direct connection of the Wolffian tubules with the Wolffian duct. ; When one considers the imperfection of optical instruments in use at the period when Miiller, Rathke and Valentin lived, one can only wonder at the accuracy of their observations. In mammals, von Baer (37) says, that the primordialnieren arise and disappear as in birds and that their structure clearly points to the general characters of secretory glands. Bischoff (42) remarks that the Wolffian bodies are only to be found in very young human embryos and that in the second month only faint traces of the glands are to be found. This author agrees with J. Miiller, Rathke, Jacobson, E. von Baer that the Wolffian body is an excretory organ. Koebelt (47) observed the atrophy of the Wolffian body in man and higher mammals and from his work concludes that the epididymis of the male is a homologue of the epoophoron in the female. Waldeyer (70) devoted his attention to the early developmental changes of the Wolffian body in the chick, mammals and man and found the phases of development in the two latter in no way different from the former. From the fact that the Wolffian canals in their several portions are lined with different forms of epithelium, Waldeyer came to the con- clusion that there were two types of canals in the gland and from this fact differentiated them into a sexual and a urinary portion; from the former arises the epoophoron or epididymis and from the latter the DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 217 paroophoron or paradidymis. This opinion was concurred in by Rathke, Dursy and J. Miiller. All investigators prior to 1870 regarded the Wolffian tubules as arising either as evaginated blind sacks from the Wolffian duct or from dif- ferentiation of the mesoblastic tissue of the middle plate. In the year 1874 a new theory was promulgated by the independent investigations of three men, Semper (75), Balfour (74) and Schultz (75) who came to the conclusion that in Selechians the segmental Wolfhan canals are in relation with the coelom by means of nephrostomes. According to Semper these segmental canals arise from hollow invagina- tions of the pleuro-peritoneal epithelium. Balfour regarded the canals as arising from solid buds from the intermediate cell mass, the buds later acquiring a lumen. Gétte (75), working independently of the preceding authors, found in amphibia that the Wolffian tubules arise as hollow outgrowths from the urogenital fold of the peritoneum. This observation was confirmed by Spengel (76) and Fiirbringer (78). Spengel and F. Meyer, working independently discovered in 1875 that the amphibian Wolffian body possesses peritoneal funnels and the former regards the Wolffian body of amphibians as possessing a segmental formation and holds that its peri- toneal funnels deserve as in Selachians, the name of segmental nephro- stomes. Fiirbringer (78) has shown in Petromyzon that the first anlage of the Wolffian body originates from segmentally arranged cell cords which arise from the peritoneal epithelium. In 1875 KGlliker (75) investigated the origin of the Wolffian tubules of amniota which agrees with the anamnia in its essential features. In reptiles according to Braun (77) the Wolffian tubules arise from buds which had previously been evaginated from the coelom epithelium; these buds are segmental as in Selachians and solid as in mammals, and become segmental vesicles. The connection with the peritoneum soon vanishes. Thus we see in the seventies a strange concord of opinion; in all verte- brates which had been investigated the theory of Semper and Balfour regarding Selachians was confirmed. Sedgwick (80) advanced the view later that the Wolffian tubules in the chick do not arise as peritoneal evaginations as announced by Semper and Balfour but arise through a differentiation of the Wolffian Mesoblast. Soon after this Weldon (83) showed for Lacerta that the Wolffian tubules do not originate, as held by Braun, from peritoneal evagination but 218 ANGLE according to the theory of Sedgwick. The theory advanced by Sedgwick for birds and Weldon for reptiles was opposed by Janosik (85) who had investigated the subject in the chick. Mihalkovics (85) agrees with Sedgwick and Weldon that in Sauropsida the Wolffian canals do not arise as a growth from the coelomic epithelium but by differentiation of the Wolffian mesoblast. Hoffmann (89) investigated the Wolffian canals of Lacerta and found that they arise similar to those in Selachians, with the difference that the constriction of the nephrostome from the lateral plates occurs at an earlier period. According to Martin (88) in rabbits the anlage of the canals is dif- ferentiated from the middle plate and later loses connection with the mesoblastic somites. Kollman (92) is authority for the statement that the middle plates in amniota are segmental. This conclusion was arrived at by surface ob- servation and confirmed by sections. In man the same conditions could not be directly shown but can be assumed as the Wolffian canals are arranged segmentally and the Wolffian vesicles show segmental charac- ters. In the same year Field (91) made a study of amphibians. He came to no conclusions in Amblystoma although he considers it probable that the tubules arise fror ‘a proliferation of the peritoneal epithelium but not from a true invagination. DESCRIPTION The Wolffian body is the chief occupant of the embryonic Wolffian ridge; in Anamnia it is the chief renal organ throughout life; in Amniota on the contrary it disappears during embryonic life, being entirely re- placed by the true kidney (metanephros), with the exception of a small portion of the cephalic end which is retained and becomes a constituent of the developing sexual gland. In its primitive form the Wolffian body consists of a series of trans- verse tubules emptying into the Wolffian duct. As Sempter (75) has shown for Plagiostomes there is one tubule for each body somite. A mesonephros in the simple form in which it is first produced devel- opmentally is retained permanently, as Gegenbaur has shown, only in Bdellostoma, a species of Cyclostomes. Here the organ consists accord- ing to J. Miiller of short transverse tubules whose proximal closed ends DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 219 are invaginated by glomeruli and which open after a short course into the Wolffian duct. In all remaining vertebrates the mesonephros is metamorphosed into a more voluminous and complicated organ and shown manifold changes over the simple form. Here we find a distal strongly convoluted tube opening into the Wolffian duct by means of a collecting tube; the proximal distended portion of the canal becoming a: Bowman’s capsule and lastly a peritoneal opening leading up to the glomerulus. This latter however is not found in the amniota as maintained by Hert- wig (92) who claims that it is present in the three higher classes of verte- brates. I have searched diligently for traces of this in the chick, rabbit, cat and pig, and have found no evidence of the presence of such a canal. The Wolffian body develops in the intermediate cell mass which is formed when the mesoblastic somites are constricted off from the lateral plates; it arises through a union of the median portions of the latter and is best known under the name of middle plate. It has been amply shown that the coelomic epithelium of the middle plate represents without exception the anlage of the sexual glands and I shall attempt to show that the middle plate itself represents the anlage of the excretory apparatus and that the latter contains no traces of coelomic epithelium; thus is shown the de- scent of the entire anlage from mesoblast. Preceding the appearance of the anlage of the Wolffian tubules there appears an accumulation of mesoblastic cells on the mesial and ventral side of the Wolffian duct. These cells assume a radial appearance and become hollowed out to form small vesicles. These vesicles were termed mesonephric vesicles by Remak (50) and segmental vesicles by M. Braun (77). Braun found in lizards the number of vesicles to corre- spond with the number of segments but in birds Mihalkovics (85) has found the vesicles more numerous than the mesoblastic somites. In Sus I have found from two to three vesicles for each somite and conse- quently the term segmental vesicle of Braun is inappropriate for birds and mammals. The Wolffian vesicles are either oval or circular in out- line when viewed in sections and are lined with columnar epithelium. These epithelial cells have large clear and well defined nuclei and each cell possesses a deeply staining nucleolus. In Figures 1, 2, and 3, the relations of the Wolffian vesicles to surrounding parts are clearly shown; Figures 1 and 2 are transverse sections from the proximal portion of the Wolffian body of an embryo 2.5 mm. long. The Wolffian vesicle (w. v.) is seen in the above figures to be situated ventral and medianwards from 220 ANGLE the Wolffian duct (w. d.) and is in close relation ventrally with the coe- lom epithelium of the middle plate. Dorsally the vesicles are in relation with the mesoblastic somites (m. s.) and medianwards with the aorta (a). The Wolffian duct in these figures has not as yet acquired a lumen. Just posterior and a trifle lateral to the Wolffian duct a small blood vessel is visible, this is the vena cardinalis (v. c.) which is closely related to the growth of the Wolffian body. As the Wolffian body grows and enlarges the cardinal vein is forced to assume a position dorsal to the Wolffian ridge. Its position is readily seen in figures 7, 21, 9 and 10. The first two of these sections are from embryos three mm. long and the two latter from embryos four mm. long. Its shape varies greatly as will be seen in comparing the figures 9 and 10. In embryos a little older (5 mm.) it will be seen in figures 12, 18 and 19 that the cardinal vein (v. c.) is situated near the dorso-median angle of the Wolffian ridge, and is in close relation with the Malpighian bodies (m. b.) which are fully developed in embryos of 5 mm. length. The Wolffian vesicles (w. v.) are shown in an oblique section in figure 3, which is from the distal end of the Wolffian body of a three mm. em- bryo. The vesicles here are in relation laterally with the Wolffian duct (w. d.) and medianwards with the aorta (a). The small amount of mesoblastic tissue surrounding the vesicles is particularly noticeable. The origin of the anlage of the Wolffian canals is a subject which has engaged the serious attention of embryologists for the past score of years and has given rise to a voluminous literature. Among the amniota, birds have received the attention of a majority of investigator, reptiles still less and mammals least of all, which is not at all commensurate with their position and importance in the animal scale. The names of Kolliker, Renson, Kollmannm, Egli, His, H. Meyer, Nagel and Mihalkovics are in the foreground of investigators on the development of urogenital or- gans of mammals. Three views have been advanced for the origin of the Wolffian tubles: (a) The Wolffian Tubules Arise Similarly to the Tubules of Other Glands That is as Hollow Evaginations from the Wolffian Duct. This theory was advanced by Remak in 1850 and was accepted by Waldeyer (70) with the distinction that the tubule only is an outgrowth from the duct, the Malpighian body arising from the mesoblast independently and later joins the tubule. It is only necessary to examine sections of young DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 221 embryos in which the Wolffian vesicles are yet separate from the Wolffian duct to show the incorrectness of this view (w. v., Figures 1, 2 and 3). (b) A More Modern Theory is that the Tubules take their Origin from an Evagination of Cell Cords or Buds from the Coelomic Epithelium of the Middle Plate. This was first advanced by Balfour (75) and Semper (75) for Selachinas. Among workers on amniota the adherents of this theory are Braun (77), Weldon (83), Kélliker (79), Kollmann (82), Siemerling (82), Sedgwick (81) and Rensen (83). Sedgwick held this theory only for that portion of the Wolffian body which develops anterior to the six- teenth mesoblastic somite. In reptiles according to Braun the tubules arise from funnel shaped invaginations of the coelom epithelium which are then constricted off from the latter and become the segmental vesicles, and which are present in numbers corresponding to the body segments. These vesicles secondarily unite with the Wolffian duct. The vesicle proper becomes the future Malpighian body while the tubule arises from a short canal which connects the vesicle with the Wolffian duct. Weldon holds the same theory as Braun but merely makes the statement without any evidence. According to Kélliker in embryo chicks of the sehond day, there are to be seen, on the median side of the urogenital ridge club-shaped buds of epithelial cells which are growing in towards the connective tissue of the Wolffian blastem. Kolliker observed fine fissures in these cell cords, which he regarded as portions of the coelomic cavity constricted off with the cells. The connection with the coelomic cavity is lost only after the tubules have made their union with the Wolffian duct. Kolliker observed the same in the rabbit with the exception that no fissures were present. Kollmann examined embryos of mouse and rabbit and confirmed in toto the view of Kélliker. Renson (in chick, rabbit and rat) divides the Wolffian body into two portions, a proximal extending from the seventh to the eleventh somite and a distal, extending from the eleventh somite to the pelvis. In the first named region the tubules arise from isolated buds of the pleuro-peritoneal epithelium while in the latter the tubules are differentiated from the intermediate cell mass which had previously arisen from an ingrowth of the pleuro-peritoneal epithelium in the form of a longitudinal plate. The cells which become anlagen of canals are arranged around small lacunae. The lacunae are the remains of small 222 ANGLE fissures when the longitudinal plate was constricted off from the coelom epithelium. The remainder of the lacunae form the cavities of the Malpighian bodies. Renson regards the pronephros and mesonephros as being homologous organs; a view which is untenable at the present time. Hertwig (92) in his text book of embryology says: ‘The collective evidence of investigators shows that the Wolffian canals arise from the pleuro-peritoneal epithelium of the middle plate from which solid cell cords are formed and pass in towards the side of the Wolffian duct. In the higher vertebrates the development of the primitive kidney is to a certain extent abbreviated, in so far as the separate cords of cells which arise at the constricting off of the primitive segments lie very close to- gether and constitute an apparently undifferentiated cell mass out of which the mesonephric tubules subsequently appear to have been dif- ferentiated. The source of its material (mesonephros) is either directly or indirectly the epithelium of the body cavity as it has been possible to prove in many cases in Selachians, amphibia and amniota.” (c) The third view is that the Wolffian tubules are derived independently of previous existing epithelium through differentiation of the Wolffian meso- blastic tissue. This view was first advanced by Remak (50) and accepted by His (80), Bornhaupt (67), Egli (76), Sernoff (76), Mihalkovics (85) and H. Meyer (90). Balfour (79), Sedgwick (80) and Fiirbringer (78) hold this view for that portion of the Wolffian body developing distal from the sixteenth somite. Mihalkovics (85) has made a very thorough and exhaustive study of the development of the Wolffian body in the lizard and chick and finds no evidence whatever to substantiate the views of Braun, Kélliker and Rensen. Mihalkovics has shown that the tubules of chick and lizard which correspond to the seventh to the eleventh somite inclusive arise from the coelom epithelium and that each tubule is connected with the coelom cavity by means of a funnel shaped nephro- stome. At the median side of each nephrostome and projecting out from the root of the mesentery is a free glomerulus. It is admitted by all modern investigators that the above constitutes the head-kidney or pro- nephros which is in no way connected or homologous with the Wolffian body. The error of Balfour, Sedgwick and others arose no doubt from the fact that they regarded the pronephros as the anterior portion of the Wolffian body. I have verified the work of Mihalkovics in the chick and find no nephrostomes or free glomeruli farther distal than the body DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 223 somite. Sedgwick makes the sixteenth somite the point of differentiation. His (80) in description of embryo “a” says that the thickness of the walls of the Wolffian duct at an early period is double the size of that structure later on. This fact would cause him to conclude that the tubules arise from the duct by a fold and a consequent thinning out at this point if the collective evidence of vertebrates did not point to their formation from the Wolffian mesoblast. Nagel (89) in his description of two human embryos rejects the coelom theory in toto and while admitting that his embryos were much too old to give information on this point says if it were not for the opinion of His (see above) he would be inclined to believe that the tubules arise as outgrowths from the Wolffian duct. In order to prove unequivocally that the Wolffian tubules arise from the meso- blastic tissue of the middle plate one must have embryos of such ages which will show the complete .cycle of changes from undifferentiated mesoblastic tissue to fully formed Wolffian vesicles. From this point of view I am unfortunate in the selection of my subject material as in my youngest embryos (2.5 mm.) the segmental vesicles are already well formed and differentiated from the surrounding tissue (see w. v. figures 1 and 2). If the vesicles arose from the coelom epithelium one would expect to find some indication of this occurrence at the point to where they were constricted off from the latter, opposite to the vesicles, but by observing the vesicles (w. v.) in figures 1 and 2, it will be seen that no fissures, thinning out of the epithelium, or depression of the latter are to be found. The anlage of the Wolffian canals develop in a distally extending direction and in the embryo from which figures 1 and 2 are taken the vesicles are well formed at the proximal end. At the distal end of this embryo the cells of the mesoblastic tissue are just arranging themselves around a common center and no lumen is present. Another point which adds considerable confirmatory evidence is the fact that the immature vesicles at the distal end are no nearer the coelom epithelium than the more fully developed vesicles of the proximal end; which should be the case if the vesicles arose from the coelom epithelium. In the embryo (3 mm. long) from which figures 7 and 21 are taken one finds separating the coelom epithelium from the underlying blastem, first a compact layer of connective tissue (c. t.) and second an intercellular space (i. s.) each of which amounts to more than the thickness of a tubule. With the exception of the point at which the tubules adjoin the Wolffian duct the 224 ANGLE coelom epithelium is separated from the underlying structures in this embryo. As previously stated, I admit that my evidence is not complete but all the facts which I found point strongly to the origin of the Wolffian canals from the mesoblastic cells of the middle plate. I hope in the near future to obtain younger embryos which will unequivocally settle this point. While the theories regarding the origin of the anlage of the Wolfhan canals are numerous there is a corresponding scarcity of accounts describing the changes by which the primary vesicles are metamorphosed into a fully developed canal, ending distally in a Malpighian body and proximally opening into the Wolffian duct. Sedgwick (80) gives the following account which is decidedly indefinite, ‘from the inner and dorsal wall of the vesicle a glomerulus is ultimately developed. The whole structure grows enormously and gives rise to the Malpighian body and complicated coils of the later Wolffian tubule. The question as to whether or no there are outgrowths from the Wolffian duct to meet the independently developed Wolffian tubules is not easy to answer. I am not now in a position to give a definite answer and will merely state that there are appearances in my sections which incline me to the opinion that there are outgrowths from the Wolffian duct which in the case of the primary Wolffian tubules are solid but hollow in the case of the secondary and tertiary tubules.” Waldeyer (65) regarded the tubule proper as an outgrowth from the Wolffian ducts while the Malpighian body develops separately in the intermediate cell mass and later joins the tubule. Braun (77) holds in reptiles that there is a short connecting canal given off from the Wolffian duct which joins the segmental vesicle and that by the lengthening out of this canal the tubule proper is developed; while the Malpighian body is formed from the vesicle itself. The most painstaking and the only complete account which I can find is by Mihalkovics (85)and he gives in detail, illustrated by a number of figures, the various changes assumed by the vesicle in its conversion into a Wolffian tubule. He gives an account of this process in both the lizard and the chick and as they agree in all essential points it will serve our purpose to relate briefly a summary of this change occurring in the chick. The Wolffian vesicles are situated at the median side of the Wolffian duct and their contiguous surfaces are in close contact and at the point of union, there is a melting away of the cells and a communication is formed connecting the lumen of both vesicle and duct. At the same time that the above is occurring the round DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 225 form of the vesicle becomes flattened by the sinking in of its dorsal wall and asa result we see in cross section, a half moon shaped body the lateral wall of which is joined to the median side of the Wolffian duct, and its convex wall is ventral and at the median side of the urogenital ridge, close to the coelom epithelium and its median point directed towards the aorta. In the concavity of the half moon is an aggregation of connective tissue which is the anlage of the future glomerulus. The short canal which connects the vesicle with the Wolffian duct is the anlage from which, when fully developed, a tortuous tubule arises; while the Malpighian body alone arises from the half moon shaped Wolffan vesicle. This account of Mihalkovics for the chick is entirely different from what I have found in Sus. In the pig the Wolffian vesicle assumes an oval form with its long diameter directed dorso-ventralwards, the walls of the Wolffian vesicle and duct being in close contact. Shortly after this the two are connected by a short canal, which is given off from the dorso-median wall of the Wolffian duct and uniting at the dorso-lateral border of the vesicle. In figure 4 the vesicle (w. v.) is seen united to the Wolffian duct (w. d.) by a short curved canal as above described. By comparing figures 1 and 2 with figure 4 it will be seen at this stage that the middle plate has increased considerably in size and now projects into the body cavity and from this period on will be designated as the Wolffian ridge. The vesicle having become oval has receded back from the coelom epithelium (c. e.) and its long diameter is vertical to the body axis. Otherwise the relations of the vesicle to surrounding tissues and organs are not changed from what was described in figures 1 and 2. A lumen in the canal connecting vesicle and Wolffian duct is not present at this early period (4). As to the origin of this canal whether derived from the vesicle or from the Wolffian duct I can not positively state, but it would seem that it is derived from the latter, from the fact that its cells like those of the Wolffian duct have taken the stain with great avidity while the cells lining the vesicle have pale nuclei. By comparing figures 4 and 5 it will be seen that the next stage of development is brought about by the sinking in of the median wall of the vesicle at point ‘a’ and causes the latter to assume somewhat of an ‘S’ shape (figure 5) whereby the anlage of the three portions of each tubule and Malpighian body can be differ- entiated. The proximal portion of the tubule (5) is quite narrow and it now has a distinct lumen and curves dorsally and passes under the ventral border of the cardinal vein (c. v.) and shortly afterwards unites with the 226 ANGLE second portion of the tubule at point 1 (figure 1). The second portion of the tubule extends from 1 to 2 and is spindle shaped(figure 5). This second portion curves ventralwards with a slight lateral deviation and then becomes constricted at point 2, then makes a sharp curve median- wards and passes over into the third portion of the tubule. This third portion extends from point 2 to anlage of the Malpighian body and like the first portion is quite narrow. The third portion is directed median- wards and is parallel with the ventral surface of the Wolffian ridge. The anlage of the Malpighian body is the expanded distal end of the third portion of the tubule (5) and its median surface is in close relation with the aorta (A). In figure 6, a trifle older stage is shown and the several portions of the tubule are more clearly defined than in figure 5. From the preceding account it will be seen that the two distal portions of each tubule and the Malpighian capsule are derived from the Wolffian vesicle. By comparing figures 4, 5 and 6, it will be seen that the lumen of the two distal portions of the tubule and the Malpighian capsule are filled with darkly stained formative cells while in figure 6 no such cells are present in the proximal (first) portion of tubule. This fact is additional evidence that the first portion of the tubule arises as an outgrowth from the Wolffian duct. In figure 8 the first portion of the tubule and the Wolffian duct are also seen to enclose these building cells but I think it purely accidental here and believe they have migrated from the other portions of the tubule, after union with the Wolffian duct; for in figure 3, from a section showing Wolffian vesicles (w.v.) and Wolffian duct, the former are seen to enclose these formative cells while the latter has a clear lumen. Mihalkovics (85) represents the glomerulus as developing pari passu with the tubule. In Sus this does not seem to be the case. In an embryo of three mm. from sections of which figures 21 and 22 are taken the canals in the proximal three-fourths of the gland have assumed their typical curves, but the expanded distal end of tubule which is the anlage of the Malpighian body (a. m. b.), shows no evidence of invagination. In figure 20, the anlage of Malpighian body shown in figure 22 is seen more highly magnified; it is to be noticed that no evidences of invagina- tion are to be seen. In embryos from 3 to 3.5 mm. the changes relative to the invagination of the Malpighian capsule and the formation of the glomerulus are first to be seen. The origin of the Malpighian tuft of vessels (glomerulus) has, so far as I have been able to ascertain, received very little attention from workers in this field of embryology. The only DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 227 detailed account I have found is by Mihalkovics (85) who accepts the theory advanced by Gétte (74) and Fiirbringer (78) for amphibia and Braun (77) for reptiles. Mihalkovics found in the chick that the invagi- nation of the Malpighian capsule went on pari passu with the develop- ment of the tubule and that first a collection of mesoblastic cells are noticed around the dorsal wall of the capsule and these later are invagi- nated into the capsule and become the anlage of the glomerulus. At this period no branches are seen approaching the Malpighian body from the aorta. Soon after invagination has occurred, groups of darkly stained cells are to be seen among the connective tissue of the glomerulus anlage. According to Mihalkovics these darker stained cells are first transformed into colorless and then colored blood corpuscles; surrounding connective connective tissue becoming the coiled vessels. Mihalkovics quotes Romiti and Schafer as giving this origin for the blood corpuscles and their enclosing vessel walls, for other organs. I do not doubt the perfect physiological propriety of this view but as a matter of fact it does not occur here. In figure 7, from an embryo 3 mm. long, the changes pre- paratory to formation of the glomeruli are to be seen. It will be noticed. in this figure that the aorta (a) is relatively of large size and that opposite the median point of the Malpighian capsule, there is an evagination of the aorta and at this point a diverticulum is given off from the latter, which passes outwards into the connective tissue of the Wolffian ridge and comes in close relation with the dorsal wall of the Malpighian cap- sule. The wall of the aorta is continuous with the wall of the diverticu- lum and the latter is seen to be filled with numerous blood vessels enclos- ing blood corpuscles. In some cases I find no diverticulum from the aorta, but a number of small blood vessels instead which ramify on the dorsal surface of the capsule; preparatory to invagination of the latter In figure 17, from an embryo of 4 mm. in length the glomerulus is com- mencing to invaginate while in figure 16 a fully developed Malpighian body, from a 5 mm. embryo, is shown; the glomerulus being entirely invaginated and surrounded by a Malpighian capsule. The cells seen in the glomeruli of figures 16 and 17 are the nuclei of the endothelial cells of the coil vessels, and the wavy outline of the latter is seen in figure 16. In figure 16 in the cells lining the Malpighian capsule the transition from cylindrical to cubical and later to connective tissue is clearly shown. Figure 13 also represents a mature Malpighian body but owing to greater pressure there is less space between glomerulus and capsul thane is seen 228 ANGLE in figure 16. In figures 18 and 19, from an embryo 5 mm. long the Mal- pighian bodies are fully developed and the large branches given off to the glomeruli from the aorta are seen. Each fully developed Wolffian canal consists of three typical portions, a dorsal (first), ventral (third) and middle (second) which are connected by two sharp curves. The dorsal portion cylindrical in form affords the connection with the Wolffian duct and then curves dorsalwards along the lateral edge of the Wolffian ridge and then passes medianwards along the ventral edge of the cardinal vein and approaches close to the aorta, on the inner side of the ridge, where it makes a sharp curve and passes over into the spindle shaped middle portion of tubule. The middle portion passes ventralwards and then curves under the first portion and here makes a sharp curve and passes into the anterior portion of the tubule which is directed medianwards and passes close to and almost parallel with the ventral surface of the Wolffian ridge and then expands into the capsule of the Malpighian body, at the median ventral angle ' of the ridge. The above described relations are readily seen in figures 8 and 12, the first or posterior portion of the tubule extends from the Wolffian duct (w. d.) to point designated (1) where there is a sharp curve. The middle or second spindle shaped portion extends from point (1) to (2) where we find the second sharp curve. The anterior or third portion of tubule extends from point (2) to the Malpighian capsule. In figures 9 and 10 (left section) the proximal two-thirds of first portion of tubule (t. w.) isseen. In figure 12 a complete tubule with its Malpighian body is shown. In figure 8 the tubule is seen arising from the ventral side of the Wolffian duct, an occurrence which I have only found two times in examining several thousand sections of this region. In figure 12 at point (s) (in first portion of the tubule) there is seen a sharp secondary curve. In figure 8 from a somewhat younger embryo this secondary curve is present but less sharply defined. I do not find a description of this secondary curve in the writings of any author who has investigated the Wolffian body. While each Wolffian canal shows three typical positions it is impossible to find any two canals which are identical throughout their entire course. In embryos of 5 mm. from sections of which figures 18 and 19 are taken, it is no longer possible to recognize the entire course of a tubule. As the Wolffian body develops the tubules lengthen out and new curves arise, giving the canals a highly tortuous and convoluted course. DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 229 ‘With the formation of the primary tubules and their glomeruli the growth of the Wolffian body is by no means complete. Two factors contribute to the further growth of this organ; first the lengthening out of the several portions of each tubule, the intensification of the primary curves and by the addition of new ones; second by the formation of secondary, tertiary and quaternary canals. I shall designate as secondary canals all tubules developing subsequent to the primary set. As the origin of the primary mesonephric tubules gave rise to several theories, we have likewise a number of different views regarding the origin of the secondary. (a) The first view—The secondary tubules and their glomeruli arise either by fission or buds from the primary set. Either of these processes may have as a starting point the wall of the Malpighian capsule or the tubule itself. Braun (77) found in reptiles and Spengel (76) in amphibia that the primary glomeruli are first divided by fissures which continue along the course of the tubule until the Wolffian duct is reached. In Selachians according to the statements of Sedgwick (80) and Balfour (74) the glomeruli is the starting point of proliferation; cell buds grow out from the latter and towards the Wolffian tubules lying in front of them with which their blind ends fuse. After this union has been effected they detach their other end from the parent tissue. Renson (83) held the same view for birds but gives no adequate proof. In discussing the origin of the secondary canals in the human embryo Nagel (89) says one finds numerous accumulations of epithelial cells in the middle of the sections and which might lead one to think the further growth of the tubules occurs through differentiation of the Wolffian tissues. But the examination of whole series of sections shows most clearly that these epithelial collections stand in direct relation with the previous formed canals and that they represent the solid ends of the same. Nowhere is there to be seen the transition of the cells of the Wolffian tissue to the epithelial cells which would be the case of the latter arose from the former. The solid end pieces of the canals are sharply defined from the surrounding tissues as the canals themselves. From this an- alysis Nagel concludes that the later development of the Wolffian canals in man occurs through a process of buds or outgrowths of the previously formed canals. Sedgwick (80) in describing this process in the chick does not seem to arrive at a definite conclusion but thinks that the second- ary arise from the dorsal walls of the primary set of tubules. 230 ANGLE (b) Second view—The secondary canals arise like the primary from invaginations of the coelom epithelium. Fiirbringer (78) is an advocate of this theory and says that the secondary canals arise from the coelom epithelium on the median side of the primary canals and passes into the Wolffian tissue in the form of cell cords which later lose their primary connection. (c) Third view—The secondary canals and glomeruli arise indepen- dently of the primary through a process of differentiation of the Wolffian mesoblast. This view was first advanced by Bornhaupt and later con- firmed by Balfour (79) and Mihalkovics (85). My own investigations are in perfect accord with this later view and I will attempt to show that in Sus the secondary canals arise independent of the coelom epithelium and primary tubules, through a differentiation of the mesoblastic cells of the Wolffian ridge. Mihalkovics (85) in reptiles and birds finds no evidence that the secondary canals arise from the primary through fission or buds. According to Sedgwick (80) the secondary canals of the chick arise dorsal from the primary and the tertiary dorsal from the secondary; but Mihalkovics has shown that the secondary canals may arise either ventral, dorsal or intermediate from the primary. Investigations of the origin of the secondary canals in Sus is difficult from the fact that the secondary canals do not appear until the primary are quite fully formed. In figures 8, 21 and 22 the several portions of each tubule are readily seen, no secondary canals have as yet appeared. Like the primary, the secondary canals develop in a proximal-distalward extending direction. In figure 21 from the proximal region of the Wolffian body of an embryo 3 mm. long, I find the first changes which lead up to the formation of the secondary canals; midway between the spindle shaped second portion of the primary canal and the aorta there are to be seen several collections of mesoblastic cells which are closely packed together. These cells take the stain with great intensity.and contrast strongly with the sur- rounding connective tissue. I find no branches from the aorta approach- ing these groups of cells nor any thickening or invaginations extending in from the overlying coelom epithelium. These cells are at quite a dis- tance from the latter and even though epithelial cords were present it would be difficult to conceive their passage through connective tissue, intercellular spaces and primary tubules and finally reach the designated point in figure 21. In figure 11 from an embryo 4 mm. long we see the next stage in the development of a secondary canal (t. w.); here a base- DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 231 ment membrane is present and the darkly stained mesoblastic cells are assuming a radial arrangement and lumen i just appearing in the vesicle. The shape of this secondary vesicle is oblong, its width being about one- half of its length; while cross sections of primary vesicles are nearly round (figures 1, 2 and 3). The next period of development is also seen in figure 11 where the anlage of a secondary canal is just ventral to the above described vesicle and has assumed somewhat of a ladle shaped form. By comparing the anlage of these two tubules (figure 11) it will be seen that the median portion of the vesicle becomes the anlage of the Malpighian body while the lateral portion becomes the tubule proper. This occurs in much the same way as described in the primary vesicles (figures 4, 5 and 6), although the process of differentiation of the vesicle into a tubule is somewhat abbreviated in the case of the secondary canals. As to the division of a Malpighian body by fissure or buds growing out from it—I have carefully examined the sections of a dozen embryos ranging in size from 3 to 5 mm. and nowhere find evidence of such occur- ences. In regard to Nagel’s view (89) that the secondary canals arise as outgrowths from the primary I can feel sure in saying that it does not occur. One can find numerous sections similar to figure 14 which appear like the outgrowth of a secondary tubule from a primary, but such is not the case for by following this outgrowth in consecutive sections it will be found to continue into a secondary tubule and the apparent blind sack to be caused by a sharp curve which the tubule made before joining the collective portion of the primary canal. According to Mihalkovics (85) secondary canals in the chick are formed either dorsal, ventral or medianwards from the primary. By comparing figures 9, 10 and 21, it will be seen that the first portion of the primary tubule passes very close to the lateral surface of the Wolffian ridge and then curves backward to the cardinal vein and lies directly in front of the ventral surface of the latter. From this it will be seen that there is but little space for secondary canals to develop dorsal from the primary and I have only found one in- stance of this occurrence which is shown in figure 15. The secondary canals do not arise ventralwards from the primary for a like want of space (figure 9) but are found to develop medianwards from the primary (figure 11). The secondary glomeruli are situated lateral and dorsal from the primary; the latter occupying a position near the inner portion of the gland just dorsal to the germinal epithelium (g. e.). The relations of primary and secondary Malpighian bodies are shown in figure 10. 232 ANGLE In the chick of five or six days Mihalkovics finds from 12 to 18 Wolfhan tubules opening into the Wolffian duct in each body somite and that it is no uncommon occurrence to find three tubules emptying into the duct in the same section and besides the tubules which open direct into the Wolffian duct he finds from 20 to 40 indirect tubules in each somite. These indirect tubules empty into the collective (first) portion of a direct canal. This would make a total of from thirty to sixty direct and indirect tubules for each body somite. I find in Sus from 2 to 3 tubules emptying into the Wolffian duct in each body somite. In embryos of four, five, eight and fifteen mm. respectively the number of direct canals remains practically the same, that is two to three to each somite. In embryos of four to five mm. length (figures 10, 11-18, 19) from two to three Malpighian bodies are to be seen in each section in the middle two-thirds of the Wolffian body. In embryos ranging in size from 8 mm. to 1-5 10 cm. one frequently finds from six to eight Malpighian bodies in a single section. From this one naturally comes to the conclusion that all or nearly all of the secondary canals in Sus are indirect; emptying into the collective portion of a primary canal. The examination of a number of sections demonstrates the correctness of this as can be seen in figures 14 and 19. In figure 11 the proximal end of the anlage of a secondary canal is in contact with the median wall of a primary tubule and later will open into it. I have only found one instance in which two tubules open into the Wolffian duct in the same section. This is shown in figure 15, the outer of the two tubules being a secondary while the inner is a primary one. Thus it appears that an occasional secondary tubule opens directly into the Wolffian duct, but is quite a rare occurrence. Lincoln, Nebraska. LITERATURE CONSULTED BaALrour, A. 1874. A preliminary account of the development of the Elasmobranch Fishes. Q.J.M.S. 1874. 1879a. Head-Kidney in the Chick. Q.J.M.S. 1879. 1879b. Text book of comparative Embryology. 1879. BAER, E. VON 1837. Ueber Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere. Koenigsberg. 1837. BiscHorr, Tu. L. W. 1842. Ent. der Siugethiere und des Menschen. Leipsig. 1842. DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 233 BoRNHAUPT 1867. Untersuchungen ueber die Ent. des Urogenitalsystems beim Hiinche. Riga. 1867. Braun, M. 1877. Urogenital system, reptiles. Arb. Zool. Zoot. Inst. Wuerzburg. IV, 113-228. Ect, TH. 1876. Sexual Organs. Zurich. 1876. FIEeLpD, H. H. 1891. The development of the pronephros and segmental duct in amphibia. Bull. Museum Comp. Anatomy of Harvard Univ. Vol. XXI, No. 5, 1891. FUERBRINGER, 1878. 1878. Zur Verleichenden Anatomie und Ent. der Excretionsorganie der Verte- braten. Gegenbaur’s Morph. Jahrbuch. Vol. IV, 1878. GASSER, E. 1877. Die Entstehung des Wolff’schen Ganges bei embryonen Hiihnern U. Gisen. Archiv. f. M. Anat. Bd. XIV. 1877. GoETTE A. 1875. Die Entwickelungsgeschichte der Unke. Leipzig. 1875. HeERTWIG, O. 1892. Text-book of Embryology of Man and Mammals, translated from the second German edition by Dr. Mark. Macmillan & Co. 1892, His, W. 1868. Untersuch. uber die Erste Anlage des Wirbelthierleibes. Leipzig. 1868. 1880. Anatomie Menschlicher Embryonen. Heft. I-II. Leipzig. 1880. HOFFMANN, C. K. 1889. Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Urogenitalorgane bei den Reptilien. Z. {. W. Zool. Bd. XXXXVIII. 1889. JACOBSON. 1824. Det. Kongl. danske Videnskabernes Selskab etc. Kjébenhavn. JANOSIK. 1885. Histologisch-embryologische Untersuchungen uber das Urogenital- system. Sitzungsber. des Kais. Akod. d. W. zu Wien. Bd. LXXXXI. 1885. 1887. zwei junge Mensch. Embryonen. A. f. M.A. Bd. XXX. 1887. KoBELtT. 1847. Der Nebeneierstock des Weibes. Heidelberg. 1847. KOLLMANN. 1892. Die Rumpfsegmente Mensch. Embryonen von 13-35 Urwirbeln. Archiv. f. Anat. u. Ent. 1892. KO.LirKer, A. 1875. Uber die erste Ent. des Sadugethierembryos. Verh. d. Phys. -Med. Ges. zu Wiirzburg. 1875. 1879. Ent. des Menschen und der hoheren Thiere. Zweite Auflage. 1879. 234 ANGLE MARTIN. : 1888. Uber die Anlage der Urniere beim Kaninchen. Archiv. f. Anat. y. Ent. 1888. MEYER, H. 1890. Die Ent. der Urniere beim Mensch. A.g.M.A. Bd. XXXVI. 1890. MECKEIL, J. FR. 1809. Beitrige zur Vergleichenden Anatomie. Bd. I. 1809. MIHALKOVICS. 1885. Untersuchunger tiber die Ent. des Harn u. Geschlechtsapparates der Amnioten. Int. Monat. f. Anat. Bd.II. 1885. Mrnort, C. 1892. Text-book of a human Embryology. William Wood & Co. 1892. MEYER, FR. 1875. Beitrag zur Anatomie des Urogenitalsystems der Selach. u. Amphibien. Sitzungsber. der Naturf. Ges. zu Leipzig. 1875. MULteEr, J. 1830. Bildungsgeschichte der Genitalien aus Anatomischer Untersuchungen Embryonen des Menschen u. der Thiere. Duseldorf. 1830. NAGEL, W. 1889. Ent. des Urogenitalsystems des Menschen. A. f. M. A. Bd. XXXIV. 1889. RATHEE, H. 1825. Beobachtungen u. Betrachtungen uber die Ent. der Geschlechtswerk- zeuge etc. Neue Schriften d. Gesellsch. in Danzig. Bd. I. REMAK. 1850. Untersuchungen iiber die Entwickelung der Wiebelthiere. Berlin. 1885, RENSEN, G. 1883. Development of head Kidney & Mesonephros in Birds and Mammals. A. f. M. A. XXII. 1883. RUcKERT, J. 1892. Entwickelung der Excretionsorgane. Ergebnisse der Anatomie und Entwickelungsgeschichte. Bd. I. Wiesbaden. 1892. SEDGWICK, A. 1880. The development of the kidney in its relation to the Wolffian body in the chick. Q. J. M.S. Vol. XX. 1880. 1881. Early development of Anterior portion of the Wolffian duct and body in the chick. Q.J.M.S. Vol. XXI. 1881. SEMON, R. 1891. Urogenitalsystem. Jena Zeit. Naturw. Bd. XXVI. 1891. ScHAFER, E. G. 1890. Quains Anstomy. Tenth edition. Vol. I. Part 1. 1890. ScHuttz, A. 1875. Zur Ent. des Selachieries. A. f. M. A. Bd. XI. 1875. DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 235 SEMPER. 1875. Des Urogenitalsystem der Plagiostomen und seine Bedeutung fur das der iibrigen Wirbelthiere. Arb. Zool.-Zoot. Inst. Wurzburg. 1875. SIEMERLING. 1882. Beitrige zur Embryologie der Excretionsorgane des Vogels. Marburg. 1882. SERNOFF. 1876. Beitrage zur Anatomie und Ent. der Geschlechtsorgane. Inaug. Diss. Zurich. 1876. SPENGEL. 1876. Des Urogenitalsystem der Amphibien. Arb. aus d. Zool.-Zoot. Inst. Wiirzburg. Bd. III. 1876. VALENTEN, G. 1835. Handbuch der Entwickelungsgeschichte des Menschen. U.S. W. Ber- lin. 1835. WALDEYER, W. 1865. Anatomische Untersuchung eines Menschlichen Embryo von 28-30 Tagen. Leipzig. 1865. 1870. Ejierstuck und Ei. Leipzig. 1870. WELDON. 1883. Note on the early development of Lacerta Muralis. Q. J. M.S. Vol. XXXII. 1883. WIEDERSHEIM, R. 1890. Urogenitalsystem, Reptiles. A. f. M. A. Bd. XXXIII. 1890. WHE, J. W. von. 1889. Excretory organs Selachians. A. f. M. A. Bd. XXXIII. 1889. Wotrr, C. Fr. 1759. Theoria Generationis. Halae. 1759. ANGLE LIST OF REFERENCE LETTERS Ofovsadssasvoresttesseienass aorta IND BAe es anlage Malpighian body ELE Sere ele as ee coelom or body cavity CON Ey, capsule COE tee Stee coelom epithelium CHE greet ak a notochord GE ees eae connective tissue Pee Oi tary ARM A epiblast [Aer te i ta glomerulus of the Malpighian body (dies WAS As EAE ab genital epithelium PLR See hee BAPE Sarees genital ridge tes ear eees intercellular space | tine aa ve athe A! hypoblast (| ROR eenerie eat tA Malpighian body NILE See ee medullary canal WIRES oir c sesso ccnascceseeate mesentery GED ee ra or es eae middle plate MS Ie Be cet hak mesoblastic somite oer eRe mesoblast NS a ene ae spinal chord SONGS 2 Pease somatopleuric layer of mesoblast SD MR cic a splanchnopleuric layer of mesoblast | CRRA SE see nee ac intestine PW sorereiese ss esas Wolffian tubule ie Biter aaeehee primary Wolffian tubule 1a os RRO Sear A secondary Wolffian tubule DG sree coh cst setiow: Cardinal vein RIS Scent erence eee spermatic vein UD Rie Rene tes Wolffian duct RED Mae seater en ey est Wolffian vesicle LP eee Hebe Wolffian ridge DEVELOPMENT OF THE WOLFFIAN BODY 237 EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVII Fig. 1. Cross section form the proximal end of the Wolffian body of an embryo 2.5mm.long. IIJ—4 x 100. Fig. 2. Left side of figure 1 more highly magnified I—5 X 190. Fig. 3. An oblique section passing through the distal end of a 3 mm. embryo. The Wolffian duct and three Wolffian vesicles areshown. III—5 X 280. Figs. 4 and 5. Cross sections from the distal end of a 4 mm. embryo. I—S5 x 190. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XVIII Fig. 6. Cross section from the distal end of a4mm. embryo. I—5 X 190. Fig. 7. Cross section from the middle third of the Wolffian body of a 3 mm. em- bryo. III—4 x 100. Fig. 8. Cross section through the middle third of the Wolffian body of a 3 and 5-10 mm.embryo. III—3 x 140. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XIX Fig. 9. Cross section through the proximal end of Wolffian body of a 4 mm. embryo. I—5 X 190. Fig. 10. Cross section through Wolffian bodies of middle third of a 4 mm. em- bryo 1—3 X 66. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XX Fig. 11. Cross section through the middle third of the Wolffian body of a4 mm. embryo. IV—3 X 125. Fig. 12. Cross section through the distal end of a 5 mm. embryo. IV—3 X 125. Fig. 13. Shows the Malpighian body seen in fig. 12 more highly magnified. III— 5 X 280. Fig. 14. Cross section through the middle third of Wolffian body of a 4 mm. embryo, showing Wolffian duct and proximal portions of Wolffian tubules. I—S xX 190. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXI Fig. 15. Cross section through the middle third of Wolffian body of a 4 mm. embryo, showing Wolffian duct and proximal portions of Wolffian tubules. I—S x 190. Fig. 16. Cross section through a fully developed Malpighian body of a 5 mm. embryo. I—5 X 190. Fig. 17. Cross section through a Malpighian body in which the glomerulus is un- dergoing invagination froma4mm.embryo. I—7 X 300. 238 ANGLE EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXII Fig. 18. Cross section through middle third of the Wolffian body of a5 mm. em bryo. X 160. Fig. 19. Cross section through the distal end of a Wolffian body of a 5 mm. em- bryo. I—4 X 39. EXPLANATION OF PLATE XXIII Fig. 20. Anlage of Malpighian body before invagination of capsule has occurred. From anembryoof3mm. III—5 X 280. Fig. 21. Cross section through the proximal end of Wolffian body of a 3 mm. embryo. IV—3 X 125. Fig. 22. Cross section through the middle third of the Wolffian body. From the ame embryo as Fig. 21. III—4 X 125. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY VOL. XXXVII PLATE XVII ANGLE = el - * ~ se » > ; ’ ° ae 7 a = a . , ’ : . 7 , yj 4 \ ‘ 4, . 4 ae “ J 4 . ; f ‘ . ; £ , ; . 1 “=v , ; / ke a i Ke ° x 1 H é k - . ( ; ‘ hi ‘ ; ; ‘ > ; 4 * 4 / - 4 ” oe ay saps , a= ~s ~ a oe ‘ - “ XXVIT Xx. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY VOL ANGLE PLATE XVIII - ANGLE RICAN MICROSCOPICAL AME nee S BS be be I le Se ROS QS) Hn a S : i= i S WH 3 N o soa PLATE X1Ix : Circds TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY VOL. XXXVII ° OOgo oo OOo a8 6 fe] eS Pas 20, 33 ay ace Po e0%,s a we eee = Woe. > S Oe Os SBE OAS Oke Os mob ANGLE PLATE XX ANGLE Ol aM Ae MOORE eae 3 8 XVIT XX. VOL. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY PLATE XXT TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY VOL. XXXVII ve lam @ £92 aD ANGLE PLATE XXII TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY VOL. XXXVII ANGLE PLATE XXIII a = ay % ' ‘ eee me HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANKTON 239 VARIATION IN THE HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANK- TON IN DEVILS LAKE, NORTH DAKOTA ERIK G. MoBerc! The horizontal distribution of plankton has been studied by several investigators and varied results have been obtained. It is usually held, however, that under uniform physical conditions the distribution of the plankton is uniform. The question is of great importance since in quantitative plankton investigations the amount of plankton found at a certain station is usually taken as representative of a large area. For several years plankton studies have been carried on at the Biolo- gical Station at Devils Lake, North Dakota, under the direction of Dr. R. T. Young, and in connection with these studies collections were made during the summer of 1914, to determine whether the organisms in Devils Lake showed any diurnal movements. For this purpose collections were made shortly after noon, just after sunset, and shortly before sunrise from the surface, the 0.6 m., the 2.1 m., and the 3.6 m. levels, the depth of the lake at that place being about 4m. All the samples were taken in identically the same place and on all occasions the velocity of the wind and the condition of the sky were similar. The samples, each of 500 cc., were concentrated to 10 cc., and counted according to the Sedgwick- Rafter? method. In each case the total number of individuals in two or three cells, and therefore in 100 cc. or 150 cc. of the original sample, were counted. The results obtained are shown in Table I. TABLE I SHOWING THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS PER LITER OF WATER 1:00-2:30 p.m. 8:30-9:30 p.m. 3:00-4:00 a.m. Depth Crustacea | Rotifera | Crustacea | Rotifera | Crustacea | Rotifera NUMACe ee 40 310 110 770 160 480 Oot vee Ls 20 440 90 * 920 240 560 7 Hie Wh ri Veen Bee. 25 380 95 680 280 360 3:6) mireo eee 125 330 270 940 260 580 Total all levels.. 210 1460 565 3310 940 1980 + Numerals refer to notes beginning on p. 265. 240 MOBERG Even if there had been a vertical movement of the organisms the total number of individuals of one series should be approximately equal to that of another series. Instead we find that the evening series contains more than twice as many crustaceans as the noon series, and that collected in the morning more than four times as many. In the case of the rotifers the variations are not quite as large. These results seem to show that there had been horizontal movements of the plankton animals during the intervals between the periods of collecting. To test the horizontal distribution further and more directly several series of collections were made during the summers of 1914, 1915 and 1916. In some cases the samples were taken from a number of nearby points in a part of the lake where the physical conditions do not vary appreci- ably, while in others the entire series was collected from a fixed point at short intervals of time. The accompanying maps show the main part of the lake and the approximate locations of the stations at which the samples were obtained. In connection with some of the 1915 series the amount of phyto- plankton and of dissolved chemicals (oxygen, free and albuminoid am- monias, and CO* and HCO® ions) were determmed? in order to show the relation between the zooplankton and the food and chemical consti- tuents in the water. During 1914 and 1915 the Sedgwick—Rafter method of concentrating and counting was used in the plankton work, ten squares being counted in the case of the plants, but in the case of the animals the entire number of individuals in five cells (one-half of the collection) was counted. Except where specified the volume of each sample was 500 cc. and in all cases it was concentrated to 10 cc. During 1916 the collections were made by means of a pump anda plankton-net. The water was measured by means of a water meter and pumped thru the net where the organisms were retained. Five gallons (18927 cc.) were collected and concentrated to 18.9 cc., making a ratio of 1000 to 1. In five cells of each sample the entire number of zooplanktonts was counted. The results of the measurements and of the analyses are expressed as follows: depths in meters; temperatures in degrees Centigrade; oxygen in cubic centimeters per liter; ammonias as parts per million of nitrogen; carbonates as parts per million of CO? or HCO? ions; Nodularia (the only filamentous alga) in number of millimeters per liter; other algae (includ- ing Coelospherium, Gomphospheria, Dictyospherium, Chroococcus, HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANKTON 241 Merismopedia, and a number of others, less common), in standard units! per liter; diatoms, rotifers, and crustaceans in number of indivi- duals per liter. The variation in the horizontal distribution of the plankton may be studied from three different points of view; namely: (1) the variation of the total amount of plankton, (2) the variation of each species, and (3) the correlation between the zooplanktonts, the phytoplanktonts, and the physical and chemical conditions of the environment. ES ST Pe S- sx, te | oot ak fe a = | MAIN PORTION OF So. 4 | DEVILS LAKE,MD. Bx o | Lxplanarions: ; = — Shore Lyne 17 1883 < OEE EA ” n & 916 (Apres) 3 Sca/se of mervers. venir iz et 10 fog? ing loco 2220 102 Zé NC Maa ici i SF auc ance ye Poe aoe ty alien Cpe a fs = ¢ We LP gic: ae a ae [oS FF O82 Stotign Bier Nac CHAUTAUQUA rock eS) eee a Say Re Recemncorense NP SDN Mitta f + Grounds. \ ire Tslodgt seen ae rahe = ge iS 77 Tei, DEVILS LAKE INDIAN SPISY FIGURE 1 242 MOBERG The Sedgwick—Rafter method hardly lends itself to the study of the total amount of plankton but it may be roughly estimated by considering the occurrence of the more important species. The number of individuals of the different species, however, may be determined quite closely. ° Biologica l Station MAP Showin 2g the Portion of Devils Lake tn wArtch the Plankion Distribution was Studied, Explanations: A-, B-B, ete. = No. of Series 2,3, etc. = » *# Sample. 0 100 200 sha aie el Scale of Melers. & FIGURE 2 HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANKTON 243 Whipple’ states that the experimental error is not more than about ten per cent. In the case of some of the algae, the error is probably larger, especially since only ten squares were counted, and in considering the results this should be remembered; but for the animals it is probably less since a large portion of the sample was examined. Since in most cases the depth and the temperature were measured and the amount of chemi- cals determined, the results give some conception of the relation between the plankton and the environment. It must be remembered, however, that some of the variation in the chemicals is due to experimental error. NOTES ON THE DIFFERENT COLLECTIONS AND TABULATION OF RESULTS Series A. A set of eight samples was collected on August 19, 1914 from points lying in a straight line between the two shores of Creel Bay The distance between each two points was about 100 meters and the time required for the whole series was about a half hour. The greatest depth between the two shores was 4.5 meters at points 5 and 6. At no point does the depth vary more than one meter and the character of the bottom is uniform, the points 1 and 8 being outside the littoral zone. At the time of collecting the sky was clear and there was almost no wind. Only the animals were counted and the results are shown in Table IT. TABLE II SHOWING DATA FoR SERIES A (Amt.=Amount. % var.=variation from the mean in per cent) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 )|)s | |S | |§ | — | ucx-_ Memperature<:-. sch 21.8; +3.3} 21.5} +1.9) 21.0] —0.4; 21.0} —04 Brachionus satanicu......... 108 | —39.7| 48 | —73.2| 128 | —28.4| 140 | —21.8 Brachionus miilleri.......... 44 | +62.9| 40 | +48.1) 36 | +33.3} 24 | —11.1 Pedaliont/2ei.c a anne, 248 | —32.6| 540 | +46.7| 300 | —18.5) 324 | —11.9 Moirias.2 2420 te aes rane 104 | —13.3} 40 | —66.6| 16 | —86.6} 92 | —23.3 Cyclops: 25. eee ee 16 | +10.3) 4 | —69.2} 4 | —69.2) 24 | +846 Diaptomwus...........00-....| 0 |—100.0) 4 |+100.0|/ 8 |+300.0} 0 |—100.0 1a) LT eas iene ke le 80 | +66.6| 36 | —25.0| 28 | —41.7| 48 0.0 244 MOBERG TABLE II (Continued) Sample 5 Sample 6 Sample 7 Sample 8 SSS SSS, Ess eee ee Temperature..........| 20.8) —1.4| 20.8] —1.4| 21.0] —04) 21.8) +3.3] 21.1 Brachionus satani- CUS.crcccseeeeeeeee.-.-| 356 | +98.9| 292 | +63.1} 200 | +11.7| 160 | —10.5} 179.0 Brachionus miilleri} 16 | —40.7/ 36 | +33.3} 4 | —85.1) 16 | —40.7| 27.0 iPedalion ese... 564 | +53.2| 372 +1.1) 372 +1.1} 224 | —39.1} 368.0 IMOITIA 2 Oates 44 | —63.3} 148 | +23.3| 144 | +20.0} 372 |+210.0] 120.0 KY COPS 5.22023 Sssdeses 24 | +84.6} 28 | +93.1 4 | —69.2} 12 —7.6| 14.5 Diaptomus}........... 4 |+100.0/; 0O |—100.0) 0O |—100.0) 0 |—100.0 2.0 Nauplii....................) 84 | +75.0} 48 0.0; 16 | —66.6| 44 —8.3| 48.0 These analyses show a large variation of all the species and especially of the Crustacea. The total number of animals is almost constant, how- ever, since one form is numerous where another is scarce. ‘The tempera- ture varies one degree but does not seem to have any effect on the num- ber of animals. The variations shown by the different species are sum- marized in Table III. TABLE III PERCENT OF VARIATION FROM MEAN OF SERIES A Brachionus satanicusS.............0.-c.c+-c-+ +43.4 +98.9 —73.2 124 Brachionus miilleri.........0...0....ceeee + 44.4 +62.9 —85.1 148.0 Ped alionumes meetin te sercleees eo Re ae SS +53.2 —39.1 92.3 INEQIN OMe eee ce rte Tee Reh + 63.3 +210.0 —86.6 296.6 Cyclops Meco cs tes mesos tei sess eenke +61.0 +93.1 —69.2 162.3 ING Uplii ees ey ee otra ras oe +35.4 +75.0 — 66.6 141.6 Series B. These samples were collected on August 25, 1914, in the same locality and under the same weather conditions as those of series A, but the distances between the different points of series B were about twice as large, and 1000 cc., instead of 500 cc., were concentrated. No separate counts were made of the different species but the animals are grouped under Crustacea and Rotifera. The Crustacea include: Moina, HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANKTON 245 Diaptomus, Cyclops, and Copepod Nauplii. The Rotifera include: Brachionus satanicus, B. miilleri,’ Pedalion, and a few Asplanchna. The results are shown in Table IV. TABLE IV SHOWING DATA FOR SERIES B (Amt.=amount. % var.=variation from mean in per cent) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 De Oe nl Amt. |% var| Amt.| % var.| Amt. |% var.| Amt. |% var. | Mean Temperature.......... 1G etd becereto ea fe al ebye] bea eerste Mi WS eto| Leer eee 15:2 [tae Crustacea.............. 198 |—44.7| 355 —0.8) 552 | +54.2] 326 —8.9| 358 Rotitera...........0-- 162 |—46.2| 427 | +41.8} 316 +4.9! 298 —1.0| 301 For the Rotifera the mean variation from the average is +23.4% the maximum variation +42%, and the minimum variation —45.7%, making a range of 87.7%. For the Crustacea the figures are: mean +27.1%, maximum +54.3%, minimum —44.6%, range 98.9%. Here again the crustaceans show a larger variation than the rotifers, altho the former are more numerous. Series C. This series was collected on June 6, 1915, from points lying in a straight line parallel to the shores of Creel Bay, point 1 lying just south of where the collections of series A and B were made, and point 5 a short distance inside the mouth of the bay. The sky was clear, the time required about one hour, and the distance between each two points about 250 meters. The results are shown in Table V. The very slight variation in depth shows no effect upon the organisms. The chemicals, excepting the ammonias, show a uniform distribution, the variations not being greater than the errors of sampling and analysing. None of the plankton forms, nor the plankton as a whole, show any rela- tion to the amount of ammonias. It may be noted that most of the forms were scarce at point 1, and abundant at point 5, but at the inter- vening points the total amount of plankton appears quite constant. Table VI summarizes the variation of the different plankton forms. FOI Lte- Zl VZ—- SOL Liet 7ST 6+ 09T 9°Sp— 09 weer cece r ene reece eeseseseccscses mydneyy 200th fOr 16 eo= ZL ec 88 9°99+ OST 1 ee oases) liane sors snu0jydeiq 02 o'ost+ 9¢ 0'09— 8 0'0r+ 8Z 0'07—- oT 0'0r— Gliese cn eee SIpHLA sdops4y rel! EST 86 c= 8 o's7+ OI CO ZI (00S S0 = |""= “qysaajAs vuyoueldsy BLC — lerc=- (a6 SN WY Ses 961 SOs+ g7e°= |6:eo— sol |e ir Bel selc we: wMoTUUAy UOTTepad ral 9°99— P Cee 91 0'0 ral ogo 8 9°99+ Cee |e LoyNu snuomorrg 6ST 79S+ OF o'st7+ ze ¢9— 2 (Si 02 Lec= (tee. | Poca snorueyes SNUOIyIRIg 000'ss¢e|6'ss+ 000‘8SS|S'F+ 000‘FLE\T 6¢— 000‘'8TZ|/¢° 47+ 000°9SF|Z 6r— OOO ST ee aezTy 19y10 008‘F8 | TE—- 0008S |S°ZT— 000°02 |L:Sh— 000°9F |F'S6+ 000F9T|F T+ 000‘98 J" vuasrunds virepnpoN 519-6 — 709) 3=«@'b+ ao — |\0t-+ C= tp 06s §=|r'7— TS se eee See uorOOH ree lect ene Ir-zt— sz. Ire siz lezt+ zz 6+ QZ rrsvrrnsesnentsenernneun moro) epeeectansocesr S| ceatactancseés 79 a secveveee eae lostesesececcevecs set locsecenenesces $9 capeevesessens 79 waskppondtes e® 79 SIRE OEE Season AF y,00()) hie = (S—|00'T 00 cT'T ¢'8z— | 18'0 gos | SLT O'S b== (59610: of 2 vluouUy prourmnqy,y [St 02 —s0—— 10ST'0 O'Sb+ |06T'0 O'7P— |9L0°0 Re— 0710 OMS COT 9 ae aes VIUOWUIY 994,J 1S Su4+ cs S 2+ (eG 61+ Gs 86 OT 8'6— OF ome eds serernscceeveseensseseseeesens yideq ueayy java %} = ‘qwy wa %| ‘quy ra %| ‘yuy wa Y%| “ywoy ea % quUIYy g ajdures 7 ajdures ¢ ajdures Z adres T 9]dures (sojqe} SnorAaid Ul sv SuOTyeIAZIqqY) dQ SaIIyag AOI VIVG A aTavi HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANKTON 247 TABLE VI PRECENT OF VARIATION FROM MEAN OF SERIES C Mean Maximum | Minimum Range TES LE a: eae a ane eS ED ah SID +93.4 —45.7 139.1 Other Algae: Maas We eae ore +55.9 —49.2 105.1 Brachionus satanicus................:.00 s20v 8 +56.2 —53.1 109.3 Brachionus miilleri..................00:006 +40.0 +66.6 — 66.6 133.2 Redaliont): icin sesan ny eas +29.9 +50.5 —41.1 91.8 Aaplanehaa ied: eee 2 ies ies +118.7 — 100.0 218.7 Gyclops25/5 Ge eee een ee +48.0 +80.0 —60.0 140.0 Dipptomasit)...5 sokes ee. cesccsentatincrs + 26.6 +66.6 —33.3 99.9 Nailin pets eee tate sere enees + 33.0 +44.9 —45.6 90.5 Series D. This series was collected on June 21, 1915, well out in the main part of the lake as shown on the map. A very slight south-west wind was blowing and the sky was clear. The time required was about one hour and the distance between two points about 200 meters. Table VII shows the results. These analyses show a uniformity of physical and chemical conditions, except in the case of the free ammonia which varies to an unusual extent. Since it is present in small amounts it is probable that the greater part of its variation is due to experimental error. No relation is shown between the amount of ammonia and the amount of plankton. All the animals, and especially the adult crustaceans, occur in small numbers, so that some of them will be excluded in tabulating the variation percentages. It is important to note that at point 3 all animals, except Cyclops and the nauplii, are absent, while at point 4 most of them are quite numerous. The summary of the variations is shown in Table VIII. TABLE VIII PERCENT OF VARIATION FROM THE MEAN OF SERIES D Mean Maximum | Minimum Range INodnlariany scmete end oe cl +51.9 +61.2 —72.1 133.3 Other Alode hana tek so. =paleles +22.3 —14.6 36.9 Brachionus satanicus..............-ccc-000-- +138.1 +276.2 — 100.0 376.2 Brachionus miilleri......0.0... cece. +81.8 +118.2 —100.0 218.2 Redalions): Ae War core Uaen fae nue ee ae 5/( +77.1 — 100.0 Viel Nauplii.. 3.2 iie eee ear eee +50.0 +100.0 —80.0 180.0 02 0'0z— oT 0'08— r OF 00 02 P 0°001T— 0 0:00T— 0 0 o'00¢+ 91 P 00 v 0'007+ ral 0. 0°00T — 0 T o'00¢+ r 0°00 — 0 0 0'00T+ 0 OL Lois ical 0001 — 0 96 Said Ho 09 IT PSt+ 91 0'00T— 0 F 7stt+ $7 TOT 7OL7+ Ose 0'00T — 0 8 Cis— oT OOO'LST| 9'FTI— OOO'FET | SF 000‘0ST 000‘Z6T | Z7E— 00s‘t9 {idles O00'8T | 9°%P+ 000‘Z6 O0O'FOT | S'TE— 119 9°6+ OL9 Or 18S Ses c0= 809 9€Z Stats 6£7 o'¢+ €F7Z 9£7 (ii ome 97Z 180 ro= r8°0 os= 08'0 160 ost r6'0 O10 OO0r— | 900 00F— | 900 oro 0'00T+ | 07°0 zS°9 Bl ck cO-+ cs‘ cog ene oF9 Seas ee 602 ssnsannens| gan 0°02 sassennnaeenl gg Ls cos gs oT 9°¢ gs Silas gg uvoy "IVA % *‘yUIy ‘IVA % *yULY “yuUIy "rea % “qUry P ojduies ¢ ajdures Z aduies T o[duies 000°FF tseceePscescccedssenes STIS snuojzdeiq PPreeee eee Teer eeeerrerrii gs SIPLITA sdopAg pate eee neeeeenes T1}saA[As euyourldsy iesbsissakeesiniteanates woud; Uolepag methine cancer esses To];NUL snuoTpoRIg fel’ sae kee snorueyes SNUOTPORIg wee ceecencccccccccsseseccsases aes[V 19qIO Raa eaomoaxbibiein euastumds eLUILP[NpOoN cecvecenecncesseevyccasscrcessseccos uorOooH (soqqe} snoracid url sv suoTyRTAIqqy) q saraag aod vIVG TIA a TdVL HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANKTON 249 Series E. This series was collected on July 27, 1915, from an an- chored raft some distance from the shore, where the depth was about four meters. The four samples were taken at fifteen minute intervals beginning at 11:30 a.m. and continuing until 12:15 p.m. The wind was blowing from the south causing small waves, which increased in size toward the end of the series. Cloudiness and sunshine alternated at short intervals thruout the period. The results of the analyses are shown in Table IX. The temperature and the chemicals are almost constant. The first sample shows a small amount of both plants and animals while in sample 4 the zooplanktonts are abundant. Table X summarizes the percentages. TABLE X PERCENT OF VARIATION FROM MEAN OF SERIES E Mean Maximum | Minimum Range Moudilariae stot 180k nae e kee +10.8 +10.5 —21.5 32.0 AEH OES ACh ns Sertteceec seat sas tees eae ae 740 +14.0 —9.0 23.0 GHAELOCEIOS Seon eee + 34.7 +36.1 —42.9 79.0 @eEnem GIAtOMS oF oo ae 3 scteasseess, +69.5 +139.0 —65.9 204.9 Brachionus satanicuS..........ccccccecceee- + 39.3 +78.6 —41.2 119.8 Brichionussmullent... 79.8 oe: +28.2 +54.3 —54.3 108.6 Bedalioui. eee eee eh +17.8 +35.6 —16.3 51.9 Gyclopsh sec ee ae UE ee! +25.0 +50.0 —50.0 100.0 PAPLOMLOS Ste eee ee ae ae! +50.0 +75.0 —100.0 175.0 Naa tieecs ee eee cee oe IED, +73.1 —70.1 143.2 Series F and G. These two series were collected on August 3, 1915, at the same point as was series E. Series F represents samples taken from the surface, while the samples of series G were taken from a depth of three meters. The samples of the two series were taken alternately at fifteen minute intervals, the period between the collecting of two sam- ples of the same series therefore being a half hour. The first collection was made at 2:00 p.m. The sky was clear and there was almost no wind. The results of the analyses of series F are shown in Table XI. These analyses show the physical and chemical factors to be quite constant, and the total amount of plankton seems fairly evenly distri- buted, except in 1 where all the animals and most of the plants are absent or few in number. The results are summarized in Table XII. L9 I $2 6£7 P8T PLE 000'TF oos‘eL 00S‘Z8T 000‘¢FT ¢gs OFZ S60 £00 679 uroyy Levee Ort osz7+ 07 00 144 gce+ VCE ¢'ps+ P8C Cul Vaees 077 6S9— 000°FT 67h 000°7% 06- 000°99T ¢oI+ 000‘8ST (0) | B= PLS (Gq) 4 os+ OO'T 00 £00 1 al eps L¢e'9 “rea % “‘yuULYy p ajdures TOL— 0Z ¢'0r— OF oLo+ 76 Henne eee eeeenweee eer eee eee rere sy “-mdnen osz+ 87 0'0 OT 0'00T pa 0 Aen erent een ennee STPLOIS snu0jderq 00 514 o'ost 9¢ 0'0s— ZI Hee eee e meena nee eennnne SIPIIA sdopAg OfL— 807 £9 im AG SOLS (IU) 5 eee cra Van aney CONE Rad ae+ 9g] v7 O8I ¢Fo— BQ fees Lo]|NU snuoryoerg 98L+ 899 c9C— 917 Cas cee Snoruvzes sNUOTpIeIg 61e— oo00'z%e =| 7IS— 00002 | O'6ET+ OOO Ge Se eee sumojzeIq] 19TIO Beer 000°86 | S'97— 000'%S | T9e+ OOOO RS a foroUl]e SOTED0}9eq) OrT+ 000‘80Z c0o- 000‘Z8T Ly- 000‘FLT Renee nent meee een en eee eanenne avs[V 1Iy10 6r+ 000‘OST | 79+ O00'%ST | STZ— COU Ore Bs oc vuasiunds vieynpoN cT— 916 z7+ 866 60+ Q6S | iitteeemtet: uot §QODH 07— 1Sz eo— o7 6 $+ BGT [rereeseecnesevsctenceenneesetensnn uot *Q) Ca 060 = 06°0 gars 0] 0) Rese es ct eIMoUIY plourundqry 00 £00 00 +00 00 500 eters eruourMTYy oor V~- 99 Tit 9¢'9 ween eeee Creed eee eee TTT eee Cee eee eens CeCe r rere rere reer reer ee eee uwashxO ‘eA % *yULYy "rea % *yULYy "IVA % “JULY ¢ ajdures Z adures T 9jdures (sayqe} snotAaid ul sv suolelAaiqqy) a sarwas wod VIVG XI HTIAVL 8I LLL- a T7TI+ OF I IiI+ 0Z Cac ee g if Vv dle ae'e'vld Recess swivels a eWER CC RE er mydney (4 o7o0e+ 8 0001 — 0 0001 — 0 0001 — Oe ype Set: SyLoIs snuroydercy 1)! 0'0z— 8 009+ OT 009+ 91 0001 — Opeatr oo i ee sipuia sdopAD L8T est 967 Ses Ore F'6S— 9L ,08— 9¢ Sol 60- FOI Sb+ Or 617+ 871 PH) Goes 08 OOOTT | 8'T8— 000% Sen OOOFT | &Zz7+ OO0O'FT | ¢Zz+ 000‘FI 000‘8ET | FI— 000‘OFT | 9°78+ 000'7SZ | 8'S— 000'OST | ¢'8L—- 000‘0¢ 000'EFT | Se— OO0'8ET | e'et+ 000'Z9T | 747+ 000‘%8T | T'Le— 000‘06 000's0z | I'ST— 000‘FLT | 617— 000‘09T | ¢4— 000061 | #rr+ 000'962 $P9 y= 809 (OG T¢9 Soar S99 Let P19 $02 Str 87Z 6t+ FIZ vr Sol oor 6LT 0s'0 ooz+ | 09°0 ooz+ | 09°0 o0z~— | OF0 ooz— | OF'0 Z0'0 00 z0'0 00 z0'0 00 z0'0 00 Z0'0 £9 91+ v9 00 ae) Oi z9 00 9 6°02 Or Sed 4 61+ f1Z 6T— $02 oT $02 uvoyl "IVA % “yuy ‘Ita % quy "IVA % yury Iva % *yULy L ajdures ¢ oydures ¢ ajdurrs T ojdureg (saqqe} snotaoid ur se suorjerAcrqqy) J STUNTS AOI VIVG IX WTaVL 252 MOBERG TABLE XII PERCENT OF VARIATION FROM MEAN OF SERIES F Mean Maximum | Minimum | Range Nodularia la on wetats, shes + 22.2 +444 —21.9 66.3 OthertAlyaeres ne ey oe ee ee + 20.3 +27.2 —37.1 64.3 GHAGEOCEROST the ae iiestceMoccecriatsccas +42.0 +82.6 —78.3 160.9 Other MDimtomse sees seek cee: +40.9 ays —81.8 109.1 Brachionus satanicus.............cescccee +12.8 +21.9 —23.8 45.7 PPEGNTO TI ery te ee ea MUS Bee +70.0 +81.8 —80.7 162.5 (G2 76 le) cota ED Se Ace eee a +60.0 +60.0 — 100.0 160.0 Taife rye LV Dae A SW BEE Or +66.6 +122.2 —77.7 199.9 Table XIII shows the results of the analyses of series G. Here the total amount of plankton varies considerably since the variation of the different species is more or less parallel. The chemicals are quite con- stant. A summary of the variation of the different plankton forms is shown in Table XIV. Series H. Since in the previous collections comparatively few crus- taceans had been obtained, it was decided to collect larger samples. On October 15, 1915, four samples were therefore collected from approxi- mately the same points as those of series C during clear and almost per- fectly calm weather. Two liters of each sample were filtered thru fine bolting cloth. This allowed the diatoms and some of the algae to pass thru but retained all the crustaceans and rotifers. This was determined TABLE XIV PERCENT OF VARIATION FROM MEAN OF SERIES G ee oe Mean Maximum | Minimum Range DS Gon br Fake F: Wane saopoo Na a ae a ana +26.4 +50.0 —47.4 97.4 Other/Al wae wenr ee erece ce seccwsh tees + 37.0 +74.0 —47.1 121.1 CHRELOCETOS reer e see eae -seoncace areas +50.8 +51.6 —81.3 132.9 Other Diatoms; ee ee estes +36.8 +57.9 —36.8 94.7 Brachionus satamicus...........0e0cee + 34.7 +47.8 —62.5 110.3 Wedalion so: eka ee eee ees rateo ces +78.2 +153.7 —86.0 239.7 Cyclops cc... tera eee aera +35.1 +65.2 —43.5 108.7 Diaptomius):. 8... o sy atiaes cnesconaieces +50.0 +100.0 —50.0 150.0 LES To) 1 Raa Anite oe preter p nee Sy secre +63.6 +78.2 —92.7 170.9 TABLE XIII DATE FOR SERIES G (Abbreviations as in previous tables) Sample 2 Sample 4 Sample 6 Sample 8 Amt. % var. Amt. % var. Amt. % var. Amt. % var. Mean ORV lenin. cea rate 6.0 +1.6 6.2 +1.6 6.2 +1.6 6.1 0.0 6.1 ree vAMIMO Dl Asesscnnvererten: 0.02 0.0 0.02 0.0 0.02 0.0 0.02 0.0 0.02 Albuminoid Ammonia............ 0.40 — 20.0 0.40 — 20.0 0.60 | -+20.0 0.60 | +20.0 0.50 CO; ion... "i 219 —3.9 217 —4.8 199 —12.7 Di +21.5 228 HCO; ion 618 —0.5 622 —0,2 645 +3.9 601 —3.2 621 Nodularia 78,000 +2.6 | 114,000 +50.0 | 40,000 —47.4 | 72,000 —5.3 76,000 GUEG DOANE AG oc, is caseiedssnetivscecntae 104,000 —47.1 | 342,000 +74.0 | 172,000 —12.5 | 168,000 —14.5 | 196,500 (CHRETOCETOSEs asa ateiiescscsesees 102,000 —20.3 | 192,000 +50.0 | 24,000 —81.3 | 194,000 +51.6 | 128,000 OPHEE IDIAGOMS, «ct savscnrestvercn: 30,000 +57.9 | 12,000 —36.8 | 12,000 —36.8 | 22,000 +15.8 19,000 Brachionus satanicus.............. 1,652 +25.6 1,944 +47.8 493 —62.5 eal? —10.9 1,315 Betlalionssenttins ation ean 28 —69.9 236 +153.7 13 —86.0 | . 96 +3.2 93 CANE) 0) ee rn 52 —43,.5 96 +4.3 67 —27.2 152 +65.2 92 MOS er LOM tieec sevavesesssevieresrtcoses 32 +100.0 8 —50.0 8 —50.0 16 0.0 16 NERC Urea tarkresteviesevisivise+anes 72 —34.5 164 +49.1 8 —92.7 196 +78.2 110 254 MOBERG by an examination of the filtrate. No chemical analysis was made and the plants were not counted. The results are shown in Table XV. TABLE XV DATA FOR SERIES H (Abbreviations as in previous tables) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Depth see eo 4.6, —10.7) 5.2) +1.0) 5.3) +2.9) 5.5] +6.8)* 5.15 Temperature.......... 1s) ea ee pol |Aia: F| Me ee D:D) Sete se 9.0). ech eee Mona besten 124 |+129.6| 23 | —57.4| 47 | —13.0} 22 | —59.3 54 Diaptomu............... 0 |—100.0} 4 | —48.4| 27 |+248.4) 0 |—100.0} 7.75 + Ea | ” xX ” ” ” ” ” 0.0 ” XIII ” ” ” ” ” +9.5 ” XIV ” ” ” ” ” +4.3 ”? Nay ” ” ” ” ” + 14.7 ” DOA L 99 ” ” ” »” + 10.3 ” XVIII ” ”? ” ” ” + 8.4 Average value for all the series Ys i +9.4 In figuring the results by Reighard’s method the variations of series II of the above series become +23.1% and —43.1%. The last variation is much greater than any other and Reighard states that it “is possibly sufficient to be referable to a ‘swarm.’ ” Similarly Apstein” studied the distribution in some of the German lakes by collecting thirty-one series, each of from two to five hauls. All the catches of a series were taken from equal depths from different parts of a lake. The catches (eighty in all) were undoubtedly all obtained from the pelagic zone at equal depths, but it is probable that the depth HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANKTON 261 of the lake differed at the different stations. The mean value of the variation from the mean of all the series is found to be +5.5%, corre- sponding to +9.4% for Reighard’s data. The highest variation found by Apstein is +22.8%. Apstein also counted the individual species in three series, (one of three and two of two catches) and reports some data published by Za- charias in 1895. From Apstein’s data I computed the percentages for Diaptomus and Cyclops of two of the series, the catches of the third being made in widely different parts of the lake. Tables XXIII and XXIV give Apstein’s figures together with the percentages. TABLE XXIII RESULTS OBTAINED FROM APSTEIN’S DATA FOR DOBERSDORFER SEE (Amt.=number per cubic meter. % var.=variation from the mean in percent) Sample 27a Sample 27e Sample 27c Amt. | %var.| Amt. | %var.| Amt. | %var.| Mean CyelOpss..ie ecg: 122,088 | +6.7 | 93,024 | —18.6 | 128,016 | +11.9 | 114,377 Diaptomu........... 328,320 | —7.6 } 198,208 | —44.5 | 539,947 | +51.8 | 355,492 TABLE XXIV RESULTS OBTAINED FROM APSTEIN’S DATA FOR GR. PLONER SEE (% var.=percent of variation from mean) No. pr. catch | % var.| No. pr. catch | % var. | Mean Wy clopsiie es ke eos 887 —1.5 915 +1.5 901 Diaptomu...................+ 26 —13.3 34 +13.3 30 (Natale O88 28s 372 4-13.1 286 —13.1 329 In Dobersdorfer See Cyclops shows a mean variation of + 12.4% anda range of 30.5%. For Diaptomus the figures are: +34.5% and 96.0%. In the case of Gr. Pliner See the variation for each catch and the mean variation are the same since there are only two series. The percentages are much lower than those for Dobersdorfer See. 262 MOBERG In the series collected by Zacharias Hyalodaphnia has a mean varia- tion of +7% and a range of 15.7%, and the copepods a mean of +5.9% and a range of 15.1%. (Table XXV). These figures, as well as those of Apstein, are much lower than the Devils Lake figures, and correspond more nearly with those obtained by Reighard and by Apstein for the total amount of plankton. TABLE XXV RESULTS OBTAINED FROM ZACHARIAS’ DATA Amt.=number per volume. % var.=variation from mean) Schlossgarten Alesborg Rott’s Gart’n Amt. | % var. Amt. | % var.| Mean Hyalodaphnia................... 630 | +10.5 540 —5,2 570 Copepodaes sok. 720 —8.9 810 +2.5 790 BOSMINAS Wee See ee 150 0.0 150 0.0 150 Kofoid" tested the longitudinal distribution of the plankton in Illinois River by making “a series of ten catches in immediate succession from a boat anchored in mid-channel.’”’ The current was flowing at the rate of nearly two miles an hour, and the time required for collecting was about two hours. The catches therefore represent plankton taken from a body of water about three milesin length. From the centrifuged material the volume of plankton per cubic meter was computed and the following percentages were obtained: mean +3.6%, maximum +8.6%, minimum —5.5%, and the range 14.1%. Kofoid’s results thus show a smaller variation than those of Reighard and of Apstein, but cannot very well be compared to samples obtained from a lake, especially during calm weather. The distribution of Daphnia hyalina in Lake Geneva was studied by Gandolfi-Hornyold and Almeroth” during the summer of 1913. Vertical hauls were made with a net and the number of individuals in each catch were counted. All the catches taken from the same depth on the same day were then compared, regardless of the location and the depth of the lake at the place where the collections were made. From some data given by the authors the percentages were computed and are shown in Table XXVI. HORIZONTAL DISTRIUBTION OF PLANKTON 263 TABLE XXVI RESULTS OBTAINED FROM Data GIVEN IN GANDOLFI-HoRNYOLD AND ALMEROTH’S TABELLE I Depth of |Depth of Naber per Mean % var. Mean Range Lake catch eiech from mean _ |lvar. in %} of var. in m. in m. in % 40 yl by aa fo (E —87.5 E} 45 E E 9 E E —62.5 E| 15 E 10-0 E 41 E 24 E +70.8 E +89.2 241.7 10:5, E Bi ask E —70.8 E iE) Liey Gigs | | E+4+154.2 Ej 45 —E E 185 E (E -19.7 E| E 20-0 E E 230:5 | E E/ +19.7 39.4 40 E E 2/6 E) E +19.7 E) 40 E| | E 236 E | (E —17.0E | a 30-0 |, E E ( 284.5 |, E ei +17.0 34.0 40 E | = 333. B | E +17.0 E} The catches taken by hauling the net from a depth of ten meters show a large variation, but the percentages decrease as the depth and the num- ber of organisms increase. In some cases the depth of the lake varies considerably but this does not seem to have any effect on the number of organisms. “Swarms” or aggregates, similar to those seen in Devils Lake, have been discussed several times by different investigators, e.g. by Huitfeldt- Kaas,® Reighard,* and Ward. The aggregates usually consist of Cladocera and in many cases they have been observed near the shore, but occasionally in free water. No great consideration is given them, however, since they are supposed to occur but seldom and therefore do not greatly effect the results of quantitative plankton studies. The comparatively irregular distribution shown by the zooplankton in Devils Lake is in all probability very constant since about the same results were obtained for all the series. The methods used are quite thoro and no large error is possible. It is significant, also, that both the Sedgwick- Rafter method and the pump method give about the same variation per- centages in many cases. It is hardly conceivable that the organisms in Devils Lake should have a more irregular distribution than those else- where, but no work has been done that can be exactly compared to that 264 MOBERG done on Devils Lake. Gandolfi-Hornyold and Almeroth’s results show a large variation of Daphnia hyalina but the distances between the col- lecting stations were probably great and there were differences in depth and probably also in temperature. Apstein’s and Zacharias’ counts of the individual species show a distribution quite similar to that usually found for the total amount of plankton.* Catches made with a net, as in the above mentioned cases, represent the number of individuals in a vertical column of water, and it is possible that the vertical distribution for the different catches differed altho the total amount for the entire column differed but slightly from that of another column. If this were the case the horizontal distribution for the different levels would differ. The collections made in Devils Lake to test the vertical distribution (see table I) show a large difference in the number of animals of a column of water between two periods of collecting. Moreover when a large volume of water is collected, especially with a net, the differences in distribution tend to be reduced, since by this method several thickly populated por- tions of water may be included, while on the other hand the small sample usually collected for filtration in the Sedgwick-Rafter method may be obtained entirely either from a volume of water containing a “swarm” or from one where the organisms are scarce. This method is conse- quently the more precise for studying the local distribution of plankton forms. Nor can the distribution of the total amount of plankton in Devils Lake be compared to that in other lakes, since the data for the former concern the individual species only. In the majority of cases it appears, however, that some species make up in volume or weight for the diffi- ciency caused by others. Since the main portion of plankton usually consists of algae a large variation of the animals does not greatly effect the distribution of the plankton as a whole. CONCLUSIONS From the results obtained by the study of the horizontal distribution of the plankton in Devils Lake the following conclusions may be drawn: (1) The zooplankton in Devils Lake shows a great irregularity in horizontal distribution, and this irregularity cannot be correlated with any variations in amount of phytoplankton or in the chemical and physi- cal environment. It is more likely due to the habit of swarming among plankton animals, due perhaps to a social instinct, similar to that found HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF POANKTON 265 in many other groups of the animal kingdom. Plankton swarms are at times visible, even at considerable distances, to the naked eye. (2) With larger samples (19 litres) the variations tend to be reduced, but even here they are at times greater than in the smaller ones (% litre). (3) Similar, tho in general smaller variations have been found by other workers, but no exact comparison with their results is possible, since their methods have been different. (4) Definite conclusions regarding the distribution of the phytoplank- ton can not be drawn, owing to the inaccuracy in the method of its emun- eration. In general, uowever, it appears to be more uniformly distributed than the zooplankton. (5) These variations invalidate the usual assumption that a given sample of water is representative of a large area, at least in respect to its animal inhabitants, and necessitate the collection of large numbers of samples before definite conclusions regarding their distribution or move- ment can be drawn. NOTES 1Qwing to Mr. Moberg’s absence on military duty in France, I have taken the liberty of editing his paper, adding some observations as footnotes and making a few changes in the text. The conclusions are mainly my own, but apart form these, and a few other minor alterations, the paper is his. R.T. Young. 2 See Whipple “The Microscopy of Drinking Water.” 1914, pp. 28 et seq. 8 The chemical analyses were made by Dr. Fred H. Heath of the University of North Dakota. 4 Whipple, /.c. p. 42. Whipple, /.c. p. 41. 6 In the Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, Vol. XI, pp. 373-4, Rousselet has described a new species of Brachionus from Devils Lake, under the name of spatio- sus. As this form closely resembles B. miilleri, and numerous transitional forms occur, it is here included in the latter species. R.T. Y. 7 In series H, only two litres of water were taken. In series I and J, in which 19 litres were taken, the variations are seen in general to be smaller than the average, as is to be expected. (Compare tables XVIII and XX and XXI) Even here, however, some of the variations exceed the average, while others are almost as great. (Compare the range of 184.6 for Diaptomus in series J, table XX, with the average for this genus of 172.8 in table XXT; Cyclops 121.2 in series I, table XVIII, with the average, 136.9 in table XXI, and Moina, 173.9 in series I with the average of 184.9 in table X XI.) In general, the more numerous the individuals of a species, the smaller the variations in their number. This also is to be expected. The variations in the phytoplankton 266 MOBERG are probably partly attributable, as Mr. Moberg has stated, to experimental error. In part they are probably also due to chance variations in distribution. For example, in one case in which Nodularia was exceedingly abundant, I observed it clumped to- gether in numerous small patches. If one or two of such masses happened to be in- cluded in a 500 cc sample, while another sample was free from them, they would readily explain the observed differences. Many of the variations in the zooplankton may also probably be due to chance, especially in those series where only 500 cc of water were filtered. Even so they indicate the difficulty, if not impossibility of obtaining reliable results by the Sedgwick-Rafter method, in the case at least of the zooplankton. Such an assumption is, however, wholly inadequate to explain such a variation aS is shown by Brachionus satanicus in samples 3 and 4, ser. D. table VII, in one of which 380 individuals were present in 500 cc, while another contained 0. Similarly 124 Pedalion were present in one of these samples and none in another. Vice versa, sample 3, in which no rotifers whatever occurred, contained 12 Cyclops, while sample 4, in which rotifers were abundant contained only 4 Cyclops. The comparatively few Cyclops present can hardly have determined the difference in number of the roti- fers. The two samples were taken at points only about 200 metres apart in the main body of the lake which is roughly 15 x 7 Km in extent. The day was clear with but little wind and the physical and chemical conditions at the two stations were virtually identical, as may be seenin table VII. An explanation of such variations, as due either to chance or experimental error is, in my opinion, wholly excluded. For further evidence of a similar character see Diaptomus, samples 2 and 4, ser. J, table XIX, in which 19 litres were sampled; Moina and Brachionus satanicus, sam- ples 1 and 2 and Diaptomus, samples 3 and 4, ser. H, table XV, in which two litres were sampled; Brachionus Satanicus and Nauplii samples 3 and 4, Ser. E, table IX; Pedalion, samples 1 and 5 and Nauplii, samples 5 and 7, Ser. F, table XI, and Brachion- us Satanicus, and Pedalion, samples 4 and 6, and Nauplii, samples 4, 6 and 8, Ser. G, table XIII. These conclusions are furthermore supported by direct field observations. (See FAs) Ree aN 8 The following is from my notebook: ‘‘9-17-17. I notice copepod swarms very clearly today. In places, usually in streaks, the water is milky with Diaptomus, in others very few. Occurred at surface. Sunny . . . 9-18-17. I notice numerous copepod (mostly Moina) swarms in the surface water near shore, these forming streaks in the water visible plainly at a distance of several feet. I made a collection of one of these swarms, 500 cc, which I concentrated by filtering thru No. 20 bolting cloth. Collection made by simply dipping up some of the swarm ina quart jar. . . ” This collection when concentrated to 30 cc and counted gave approximately 70,000 individuals per litre! This number, moreover, is probably somewhat too low, owing to a number of the animals adhering to the pipette in transferring to the count- ing cell) Reda. Yi: ® Reighard “A Biological Examination of Lake St. Clair,” Bulletin of the Mich- igan Fish Commission, 1894, No. 4. 10 Apstein “Das Siisswasserplankton, Methode and Resultate der quantitative Untersuchung,” 1896, pp. 51 et seq. HORIZONTAL DISTRIBUTION OF PLANKTON 267 1 Kofoid “The Plankton of the Illinois River,” Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History, 1903, pp. 269 et seq. 12 Gandolfi-Hornyold and Almeroth, “Mitteilungen iiber die Verteilung von Daphnia hyalina Leydig im Genfer See (Petit Lac), Internat. Revue d. ges. Hydrobiol. u. Hydrogr., 1915, Bd VII, pp. 426-432. 13 Huitfeldt-Kaas, ‘‘Plankton in Norwegischen Binnenseen,” Biol. Centralblatt, 1898, Bd XVIII, pp. 625 et seq. 14 Reighard, l.c. p. 32 et Seg. 15 Ward “A Biological Examination of Lake Michigan” Bulletin of the Michigan Fish Commission, 1896, No. 6, pp. 62-64. 16 Tn the case of Cyclops and Diaptomus for Dobersdorfer See, Apstein finds a somewhat larger variation. The mean for Cyclops is 12.4%, and for Diaptomus 34.5%. For Diaptomus the maximum is +51.8% and the minimum —44.2%, mak- ing a range of 96%. In the 10-0 meter catches Gandolfi-Hornyold and Almeroth find a large variation, but in the catches from greater depths it is considerably smaller. DEPARTMENT OF NOTES AND REVIEWS It is the purpose, in this department, to present from time to time brief original notes, both of methods of work and of results, by members of the Society. All mem- bers are invited to submit such items. In addition to these there will be given a few brief abstracts of recent work of more general interest to students and teachers. There will be no attempt to make these abstracts exhaustive. They will illustrate progress without attempting to define it, and will thus give to the teacher current illustrations, and to the isolated student suggestions of suitable fields of investigation.—[Editor.] GENETICS IN RELATION TO AGRICULTURE Under this title Professors Babcock and Clausen have brought to- gether in a most valuable way two winning groups of interests. The development of agriculture as an application of various underlying sciences has been one of the very creditable outcomes of scientific pro- gress. And the growth of the educational aspects of agriculture has been the wonder of modern education, which with the aid of shrewdly used political appeals has made more than one of our universities the tail to an agricultural kite. On the other hand, none of the divisions of bio- logical science approaches that of genetics in the impetus which it has given in recent years to research. This is true whether we are thinking primarily of the discovery of new facts or of the theoretical conclusions to be had from them. If therefore we acquiesce, as we probably must, in the authors’ statement that no field of science contributes more of eco- nomic worth than genetics does to the complex called agriculture, we have a measure of the possibilities of a book on this subject. In the opinion of the reviewer the book is peculiarly valuable, not merely to agricultural students for whom it is primarily written, but for teachers and students of biology everywhere, for the general reader, and for the breeder. A very rich selection of illustrative material has been made— much of it from sources not familiar to the general student. The subject is treated under three heads: Fundamentals; Plant Breeding; Animal Breeding. Part 1, dealing with the Fundamentals of genetics comprises fourteen chapters. Biologists will agree, I believe, that the various hypotheses have been fairly stated and the pros and cons of the more uncertain ques- tions justly given. The illustrative material is pertinent and modern. AMERICAN MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY 269 Part 2 discusses Plant Breeding in twelve chapters and contains such representative chapters as, Historical Introduction, Varieties in Plants, Composition of Plant Populations, Selection, Utilization of Hybrids, Mutations, Graft Hybrids and other Chimeras, Breeding Plants for Disease Resistance, Methods of Plant Breeding. Part 3, Animal Breeding includes thirteen chapters. These run parallel to those of part 2, with some of peculiar interest added—as for example, Disease and Related Phenomena in Animal Breeding, Sex Determination in Animals, Fertility in Animals, and Some Beliefs of Practical Breeders. The latter deals briefly with the scientifiic grounds for disbelief in telegony, maternal impression, prepotency, and the like. The concluding chapter states the grounds for a becoming modesty in relation both to the quantity and the precision of our present knowl- edge of animal genetics. The book contains also a glossary, a list of the literature cited, and an adequate index. It is richly illustrated with pictures, diagrams, and tables. It is an attractively made book, and is sure to prove a useful and satisfying one. GENETICS IN RELATION TO AGRICULTURE, by E. B. Babcock and R. E. Clausen. Pp. xx +675, fully illustrated. The McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1918. NITRATE CELLULOSE AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR CELLOIDIN Asa result of the war the importation of celloidin has been interrupted and the microscopist has been compelled to look about for workable, substitutes. Parlodion has been found to be very satisfactory, and can be obtained from the Arthur H. Thomas Company, Philadelphia. In this laboratory, however, we have had such excellent results with nitrate cellulose (soluble cotton) that I feel justified in calling it to the attention of other workers. Although never in very general use, soluble cotton as an embedding medium has been known for some time, and has been used for a number of years in the laboratory of Dr. Adolf Meyer, John Hopkins Hospital, as a routine method of embedding. It has two valua- ble features—the cost is less than any of the other practical celloidin substitutes, and its preparation is comparatively simple. Nitrate cellulose is shipped in strong alcohol, and upon reaching the laboratory is put through the following process: It is washed first in several changes of 95% alcohol and squeezed nearly dry; then in two changes of absolute alcohol, after which it is dissolved in equal parts of absolute alcohol and ether, filtered through absorbent gauze into a flat 270 NOTES AND REVIEWS dish and placed under a bell jar to evaporate until dry. It is then cut into thin strips and put into a thermostat for several hours at a tempera- ture of 37, the door of the thermostate being left ajar to allow for the escape of the ether fumes. When the chips are thoroughly dry they are stored in air-tight bottles ready for use. Where haste is necessary the filtration through gauze may be dispensed with, the cotton being de- canted as it dissolves and evaporates slowly under a bell jar. The bottles are then placed in the thermostat under the same conditions as described above. This, however, is a crude method, useful in ordinary work, but not to be followed where careful infiltration is desired. For embedding we use the same technique as for celloidin. Eight wide mouthed, cork-stoppered bottles are cleansed and thoroughly dried. The solutions are made up in such a way that each 100 cc. contains 2, 4, 6, etc., up to 16 grammes (by weight) of the soluble cotton. Tissue that has been thoroughly dehydrated and immersed in equal parts of absolute alcohol and ether, is then passed through these graded solutions, being left 24 hoursin each. If the tissue is to be cut immediately it is mounted on a fibre block and hardened in chloroform or in 80% alcohol. Nitrate cellulose can be obtained from Maas & Waldstein, New York. Cuas. H. MILLER Department of Embryology Carnegie Institution of Washington LIST OF MEMBERS HONORARY MEMBERS CrisP, FRANK, LL.B., B.A., F.R.M.S., 5 Landsdowne Road, Notting Hill, London, England Bg eas ds CI 0 Se ae Be ete) oi ep ORO errno ee Philadelphia, Pa. LIFE MEMBERS Brown, J. STANFORD, Ph.B., A.M.......... P. O. Box 38, Far View, Black Hall, Conn. ep Sct, BUNKER:..../...ca: pce P. O. Box 2054, Philadelphia, Pa. DuNCANSON, ProF. HENRY B., A.M..........2..22::0::00e0e: R. F. D.3, Box 212, Seattle, Wash. EEIORT: | PROF: A Bier RelA ses reese esc ecestape re 52 E. 41st. St., New York City. UAE UG FON A 5 See eee rae eda carne Chicago Beach Hotel, Chicago, Ill. MEMBERS The figures denote the year of the member’s election, except ’78, which marks an original member. The TRANSACTIONS are not sent to members in arrears, and two years arrearage forfeits membership. (See Article IV of By-Laws.) MEMBERS ADMITTED SINCE THE LAST PUBLISHED LIST HEATH, R. F. McCLENAHAN, ETHEL M., Lewis, I. F. WarrEN, D. T. WItson, Ray W. Von Kirnsmmp, R. B. ACKERT, JAMES EDWARD, 711...0..0.0.0.0..000...0000--- Kas. State Ag. Col., Manhattan, Kas. ALLEN, HARRISON SANBORN, M.A., 715............ 442 Farmington Ave., Waterbury, Conn. ALLEN; WM. RAY, MA. 715... i.cc0.-cs0c-7- 212 So. Washington St., Bloomington, Ind. PRE EGPAIS WN REP PTD Br ACMI 04h ogh ceyases sono civanecancnenpnap Beacons High School, Fresno,Cal. ANDERSON, aBiMMeAC ING 07 es oo hood. cos os ccxtecsseen Sessa tbedc caves, Station A, Lincoln, Nebr- IAN RASS fey Gente eo Des ce ee ee ans, 540 S. Main St., Manchester, Ill. ARNOLD. DRANK il Osta were: een 408 House Building, Pittsburg, Pa. UENO. WMS \ Ls) Nias peer mee pee, ks! 21 Park Rd., Wyoming, Pa. ATHERTON, Prof. L. G., A.B., M.S,, 712................ State Normal School, Madison, S. D. NTA} (0,0) 0) 3 LR ORL? fs SON ower tet Je 2) SN 16 Seneca Parkway, Rochester, N. Y. Darwin. HERBERT B., 713... ic .scsccoscccisscteieseesese, 927 Broad Street, Newark, N. J. Barker, FRANKLIN D., Ph. D, ’03......0....0-.00:--- University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Neb. BARnepENES Sc WEA U0 ee. Clemson College, S. C. BASS, Cor toe 3515 Prytania Street, New Orleans, La. BAUSCH, “TO WARE (829 ct a secle scactncs 179 N. St. Paul St., Rochester, N. Y. WAUSCH. 7) NUIEDENM Eee te Re St. Paul St., Rochester, N. Y. BEANS) Ac WES ORE Ace pene i 2811 Benvenue Ave., Berkeley, Cal. Becer, Warrinwen. Wipes tone ec St. Mary College, Dayton, Ohio 272 LIST OF MEMBERS Breer, Arpers, 1.7 Biss ACMies O40. a a eae La. State Univ., Baton Rouge, La. IBENNEHOEE, | [1D MES 7132. oe ec i Gen SCENE Alfred College, Alfred, N. Y. BENNETT, HENRY C., 93000. ceeeceeeess Hotel Longacre, 157 W. 47th St., New York City BETTS) JOHN Bi Sd ts 1a eta a i 111 Market St., Camden N. J. BINEORD; RAYMOND Phil. i ore ae 226 College Ave., Richmond, Ind. BIRGE PROF: FAS Sco: LED. FOO ea iy) neue 744 Langdon St., Madison, Wis. Neat, Ves yd) FP EAA Ba Ba ie VAR Alain ha 530 Wilson Bldg., Dallas, Texas BLT IVE IME SIDS PBI eo ine ees 2G Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Booty, Mary A., F.R.MLS., F.R.P.S., ’82.....60 Dartmouth St., Springfield, Mass. ROVERS MEM Nek AINE OD ALY Sak eer ey 6140 Columbia Ave., Philadelphia, Pa. Brove; Howarn, S.) PhD: 13.0.0: 433 E. Alder Street, Walla Walla, Wash. BROOKOVER, CHAS., A.B., M.S., ’05..0....c.cccesccecseeee Univ. of Louisville, Louisville, Ky. BROWNADR Rete h eer tek LUE ue GN ny William Nast College, Kiukiang, China BROWNING, SIDNEY HowarpD, ’11................ Royal London Ophthalmic Hospital, London Brinn CHARTERS IAD EaBe Wl oye soo 14 E. 56th St., Kansas City, Mo. BrYANT, Pror. Eart R., A:M., 710.............. Muskingum College, New Concord, O. BULL, JAMES EDGAR, /HSO) 792) 2 ee 141 Broadway, New York City BULIITT, PROP. ]S Ae NA! IVES ir ae eee tan AU ce) Chapel Hill, N. C. BUNKER GEOL iC. BSA O70 Bob Se Se NEES Ra ee 4 1K Gatun, Canal Zone Buse, ‘Karr iG vAL TAUB ny aire ere LV eae Bixley Station, Columbus, O. Yop ogrs