‘TRANSACTIONS ROYAL ‘SOCLETY OF VICTORIA. = VOL. I, PART 1 ican D. Sie. PL fe S., Fusnow OF Gon 5 Congr and Demonstrator AND ~ Agsistax? Lecronmn ix Brotogy’ IN THE UNIVERSITY OF eth) i ee Da ORGANI8ATION AND Caassirreation OF THE Cacixmes oh nh wits Dnscnrenions or tine Vicrortan Species. (With Mie MELBOURNE. ross FOR ee 2 BOYAL: socrnTY JULY, 1891 - PUBLISHING COMPANY, uaMITED, 270 post pErioe PLACE. DOV SOC hh ry OF VICTORIA. Patron: HIS EXCELLENCY THE EARL OF HOPETOUN, G.C.M.G. [President : PROFESSOR W. C. KERNOT, M.A., C.E. VicezPresidents : K. J. WHITH, F.B.A.S. | J. COSMO NEWBERY, B.Sc., C.M.G. Ibon, Treasurer : C2) BEACKHED, EC.s. Ibon. Secretaries : H. K. RUSDEN, F.RB.G:S. PROFESSOR W. BALDWIN SPENCER, M.A. bon. Librarian : JAMES E. NEILD, M.D. Council : hk. L. J, HLLERY, F.R.S. | H. MOORS. G. 8. GRIFFITHS, F.R.G.S. | PROF. H. LAURIE, LL.D. By We OW TOT ARGS. » PROBS Riots LYLE, MA« JAMES JAMIESON, M.D. ALEXANDER SUTHERLAND, M.A. A. H: 8: LUCAS, M.A;,. B.Sc. ©: A. TOPP, M.A., LL.B. PROF. ORME MASSON, M.A., D.Sc. Boi WAY, MA: TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF VICTORIA. WO. JUL PARI oe 1891. CONAN ES: A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES, sy Artur Denpy, D.Sc., F.L.8., Frtnow or Qurzn’s CoL~LEce and DrMoNSTRATOR AND Assistant LecturER IN BioLoGy IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE. PART I. ‘Tue ORGANISATION AND OLASSIFICATION OF THE CALCAREA Homocana, with Derscriprions oF THE VicTorIAN Species. (With Plates I.—-XI.) MELBOURNE, PUBLISHED FOR THE ROYAL SOCIETY BY THE SPECTATOR PUBLISHING COMPANY LIMITED, 270 POST OFFICE PLACE. JULY, 1891 It has been decided by the Council to devote Volume III. Of the Transactions to the publication of Dr. Arthur Dendys Monograph of Victorian Sponges. This forms the first part, and succeeding parts will be issued from time to time. — A MonoaraPH oF THE VICTORIAN SponaEs, BY ArtTHUR Dernpy, D.Sc., F.L.S., FELLOW oF QUEEN’s CoLLEGE AND DrMonsTRATOR AND AssISTANT LECTURER IN Biotogy IN THE University or MELBOURNE. PART I.—THE OrGANISATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE CatcarREA Homoce.a, witH DEscRIPTIONS oF THE VicTorIAN Species. (With Plates I.—XI.) (Read December 11, 1890). TABLE OF CONTENTS. PAGE. I.—INTRODUCTION Bs a0 ne mae Be ae ne 2 II—THE ORGANISATION OF THE CALCAREA HOMOC(GLA a me 5 A.—TuHeE OtyntHus TyPE no 56 Sa ae ne ae 5 B.—Tue Histonocy or THE CancarEA Homoca@ta Bd a ae 6 C.—Tue Canau SystEM OF THE CaLcAREA Homoca@na AS ILLUSTRATED BY THE VIcTORIAN SPECIES ae ote oe ae An se 23 D.—Tuer Canau SystEM oF THE CALCAREA Homoca@:La IN GENERAL .. ts 37 IlIl.—_THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE CALCAREA HOMOCGLA ay A 39 IV.—DESCRIPTIONS OF THE VICTORIAN SPECIES OF CALCAREA HOMOCGLA 45 Homoca:na SIMPLICIA Homocana REeticuLaTa Homoca:ta Rapiata DovstruL SPrcIES V.—DESCRIPTIONS OF PLATES Oc a O0 50 o0 De 72 2 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. I.—_INTRODUCTION. It is now nearly three years since the Port Phillip Biological Survey Committee of the Royal Society of Victoria placed in my hands for the purposes of investigation the splendid collection of sponges dredged by Mr. J. Bracebridge Wilson in the neigh- bourhood of Port Phillip Heads. Since that time Mr. Wilson has yearly added to the collection, which now numbers nearly two thousand specimens, and is certainly one of the finest collections of sponges in the world. In dealing with so large a mass of material the first thing necessary was to roughly sort out the specimens into their main groups. In order to accomplish even so much it was necessary to make many hundreds of microscopical preparations, and this preliminary work alone has already occupied a very considerable amount of time. Meanwhile I wrote to the Natural History Department of the British Museum and asked for fragments of all their Australian sponges for purposes of comparison and identification. Dr. Giinther, F.R.S., the Keeper of the Zoological Department of the Museum, responded to my request in the most liberal manner, and I have to offer him my most sincere thanks for sending me several hundred named specimens of Australian sponges, which are of the greatest value in determining the identity or otherwise of the various species in the Port Phillip collection with those previously described by other writers. I am also greatly indebted to Sir Frederick M‘Coy, F.R.S., who has most kindly placed at my disposal all the sponges in the National Museum at Melbourne ; to Mr. J. Gabriel for a number of valuable specimens dredged by him chiefly at Westernport (Victoria) ; to Professor W. Baldwin Spencer, M.A., for the valuable advice which he has always readily given on difficult points ; to the Rey. Walter Fielder, for assistance in making microscoyical preparations, and aboye all to Mr. J. Bracebridge Wilson, M.A., Head Master of the Church of England Grammar School, Geelong, for the great majority of the specimens and for several opportunities of accompanying him on his dredging trips and seeing the sponges in the living condition as they first come from the water. . I must also not omit to mention my indebtedness to the Council of the Royal Society of Victoria, who readily agreed to my suggestion that a special volume should be devoted to the monograph on the Victorian sponges, thus enabling the work to appear ultimately in the form of a separate publication instead of being scattered in a series of isolated papers through the Transactions of the A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 3 Society. Itis hoped that this plan of publication will render the work much more easy of reference to students. It will probably be a long time before the volume is completed, as the work can only be undertaken in the intervals between other duties. It is proposed to complete the examination of the collection systematically, sroup by group, and to publish the account of each larger or smaller group as soon as it is completed. The present contribution contains the account of the simplest and most lowly organised group of sponges, the Calcarea Homoceela. Considerable difficulty was experienced in working out this group owing to the very serious imperfection of our knowledge of the anatomy of these sponges. There appears to be a general idea that the Calearea Homoceela are all very much alike one another in organisation, and that such small differences as may exist are scarcely worthy of investigation. Heckel, indeed, in his famous Monograph of the Calcareous Sponges, recognises several distinct types of canal system, but he seems to regard them more as “ sports’ than anything else, and illustrates them all from what he considers to be a single species (A scandra reticulum).* I do not consider that there is any sufficient evidence in favour of such an extraordinary variation in canal system within the species as Heckel imagines. Of course the whole difficulty turns upon the question, ‘‘ What is a species ?”’ and this is a question which no man can presume to settle off-hand. Whatever else a species may be, however, there can be no doubt that such a thing has no existence in Nature, the term being used by zoologists and botanists merely as a matter of convenience to indicate a group of individuals which resemble one another to a certain extent.+ If, however, we are going to place in one and the same species forms so widely divergent in anatomical characters (canal system) as those which Heckel places in his Ascandra reticulum we might as well do away with the term altogether. Von Lendenfeld has added two types of canal system to the Calearea Homoceela, for which, while accepting Heckel’s views as to the intra-specific variation of the canal system in other forms, he creates two new families, Homodermide and Leucop- side. The former are supposed to be a transition form between the Asconidx and Syconid, and the latter between the Asconidie and Leuconide. The mania for dis- covering (or inventing) ‘‘ connecting links” has probably done an immense amount of harm to the progress of biological science. If zoologists would be content to describe what they see in a straightforward manner, instead of going out of their way to discover connecting links, the study of zoology in general and of spongology in particular would be greatly facilitated. *«Die Kalkschwiimme.’’ Vol. 8, Plate 20. | This question is further discussed later on, in the section dealing with the classification of the Calearea Homoceela. 4 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. The descriptions* given by Dr. von Lendenfeld both of Homoderma and Leucopsis are so inadequate and the specimens upon which the two new ‘‘ families” are based avowedly so minute, that I cannot help feeling considerable hesitation in accepting them without further evidence. In thus refusing to aceept Dr. von Lendenteld’s Homodermide and Leucopside without further evidence I am only following the example of so eminent a spongologist as Dr. Vosmaer.t These considerations have induced me to pay particular attention to the minute anatomy of the Calcarea Homoccela, and my researches have shown that in the more highly organised forms the canal system becomes far more complex than has been hitherto believed, leading to a complexity of organisation amongst the Homocela perhaps equal in degree, although different in kind, to any found at any rate amongst the Sycon Heterocela. Moreover my observations support those of Dr. von Lendenfeld in that Thave found a type of canal system closely agreeing with that of his Homoderma, but in a totally distinct species (Leucosolenia tripodifera, Carter sp.) of such a size and represented by so many specimens that mistake is impossible. In working out the Calearea Homoccela I have been much aided by the kindness of Mr. H. J. Carter, F.R.S., the well-known English writer on sponges. Some years ago Mr. Bracebridge Wilson forwarded large collections of sponges to Mr. Carter, by whom they were described in a series of papers in the “Annals and Magazine of Natural History,” the types being afterwards lodged in the British Museum. Thus many of the species with which I shall have to deal in this monograph have already been described by Mr. Carter, but the descriptions are brief, without illustrations, and the anatomy is scarcely touched upon. Thus it becomes a matter of great difficulty to recognise many of them, but this difficulty in the case of the Calcareous sponges has been to a large extent obviated by the kindness of Mr. Carter, who sent me a copy of his work with numerous manuscript illustrations and unpublished notes. For this and numerous other acts of kindness I must express my hearty thanks to Mr. Carter. Type specimens of the sponges described in the present work will be deposited in the Biological School of the Melbourne University, and it is proposed also to send a set to the National Museum in Melbourne and to the British Museum in London. * Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, Vol. IX., Part 4., pp. 1088, 1089. t Bronn’s ‘“‘ Klassen und Ordnungen des Thierreichs,” ‘‘ Porifera,” p. 387. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. Ou II.—THE ORGANISATION OF THE CALCAREA HOMOCGILA. A.—Tue Otyntuus Typr. In the hope that the present work may be of use to naturalists, and especially Australian naturalists, who are not professed spongologists, I propose to deal more in detail with the anatomical side of the question than would otherwise be necessary, and to commence by describing briefly what may be regarded as the simplest and most typical form of organisation met with in the group. We may then investigate the more readily in what manner and to how great an extent the other members of the group differ from this typical form. The simplest type of organisation met with in the group is known by Heckel’s term ‘‘ Olynthus”’,* and this name may conveniently be retaimed for the type of organisation in question, though not as indicating a ‘‘genus” in the ordinarily accepted meaning of that term. In the Olynthus type, then, the sponge consists of a small, thin-walled tube or sac, the lower end of which is closed and attached to some foreign object, while at the upper end is a large opening known as the osculuim. The wall of the tube, moreover, is perforated by numerous very minute apertures known as the inhalant pores or prosopyles.+ The prosopyles, the cavity of the tube (gastral cavity), and the osculum together constitute what is known as the canal system of the sponge, here met with in its simplest condition. The wall of the tube is made up of three distinct layers. On the outside is a single layer of flattened, plate-like, nucleated epithelial cells, polygonal in shape and in contact with one another at their edges; this layer is known as the ectoderm. On the inside is a single layer of ‘ collared cells” known as the endoderm, and between the endoderm and ectoderm is the mesoderm, consisting of a layer of gelatinous material in which are embedded the skeleton of the sponge (consisting of calcareous spicules) and various kinds of cells. The histological characters of these three fundamental layers will be described in detail later on, meanwhile it is important to remember that these three layers are found in all sponges and that they always exhibit the same essential characteristics, although numerous differences in detail are met with. * “Die Kalkschwamme,’’ Vol. 1, p. 219 etc. Vol. 3, Plate 1, Fig. 1. | The term ‘prosopyle” is used by Sollas, in his article on Sponges in the ‘ Encyclopadia Britannica,” to designate the openings of the inhalant canals into the flagellated chambers and to distinguish them from the inhalant pores on the surface of the sponge. Ina thin-walled Olynthus the inhalant pores and prosopyles are so close together that they may for all practical purposes be regarded as identical. In higher forms, however, it is very convenient to have distinct names for the two structures. 6 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. Throughout the life of the sponge a stream of water may be observed issuing through the osculum from the gastral cavity, the water which thus flows out being constantly replaced by smaller streams which flow in through the prosopyles. This stream of water is maintained by the activity of the flagella of the collared cells com- posing the endoderm. Such then, in brief, is the structure of the Olynthus, which is to be regarded as a single individual or Ascon-person.* No examples of the Olynthus type occur in the collection of Victorian sponges, but for an illustration I would refer students to Heeckel’s Ascetta (Leucosolenia) primordialis, admirably illustrated in his Atlas of the Calcareous Sponges.t It is probable that all Calcareous sponges pass through an Olynthus stage at an early period of their life history. B.—Tue Histotocy or THE CaLcaAREA Homoca.a. The Ectoderm. The true nature of the ectoderm of Calcareous sponges was first elucidated by Schulze in his well-known memoir on the structure and development of Sycandra vaphanus.' Heckel, in his Monograph on the Calcareous Sponges, had altogether failed to comprehend the true condition of things, and had confused the two layers, ectoderm and mesoderm, under the one name Exoderm (used as a synonym for Ectoderm). Useckel states§ that the ‘‘ exoderm”’ consists firstly of a ‘‘ syncytium,” and secondly of the spicules. ‘“* Syucytiuim nenne ich bei den Kalkschwammen die ganze Gewebsmasse, welche durch die Verschmelzung der Geisselzellen des Exoderms der Flimmerlarve entstanden ist, mit Ausschluss der darin gebildeten Kalknadeln. Dieses Syncytium ist aus folgenden Bestandtheilen zusammengesetzt: (1) der Sarcodine, einer hyalinen, structurlosen, contractilen Grundsubstanz, dem modificirten Protoplasma der verschmolzenen Zellen ; (2) den bleibenden und sich vermebrenden Kernen dieser Zellen, und (3) den Sficula-Scheiden, welche durch Verdichtung der Grundsubstanz rings um die Oberflaiche der Spicula entstanden sind.” Heckel himself, in his latest work on sponges, recognises his error, and acknowledges the correctness of Schulze’s view ; to quote his own words: ‘“‘ Three years later (in 1875) this conception was corrected by the accurate observations of Franz Hilhard Schulze, the excellent spongiologist, who has advanced in so many important directions the * We may conveniently retain this term although Heckel’s group name “‘ Ascones’’ has -been abandoned. } “Die Kalkschwimme,” Vol. 3, Plate 1. ae Balos ot und die Entwicklung von Sycandra raphanus Heckel.” Zeitschrift f. wissensch. Zoologie, Vol. § “Die Kalkschwamme,” Vol. I., p. 160. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. i knowledge of this class of Cwlenterata. Employing new methods of histological examination, he discovered on the surface of many sponges a delicate external pavement-epithelium not hitherto observed, and deduced from this observation the following important conclusions :— “The body of the sponges is originally composed not of two, but of three primitive cell-layers, corresponding to those which in the higher organised Metazoa are called exoderm, mesoderm and entoderm. The exoderm (or outer layer covering the external faces) and the entoderm (or inner layer lining the canal-system internally) are two simple epithelial plates, and between them is enclosed the mesoderm (or the middle layer); this latter isa kind of connective tissue, and produces not only the skeleton, but also the sexual cells (eggs and sperm). ‘“« The conception of the sponge-tissues given by F. EK. Schulze is now generally accepted, and it is very probable that it has general value, though it was not possible to demonstrate clearly in all sponges the delicate exodermal epithelium.”* The Calcisponge in which Schulze discovered the ectodermal epithelium was Sycandra vaphanus, one of the Heterocela. It was of course tolerably safe to assume that a similar ectodermal layer exists also in the Homocela, but I am not aware that this has hitherto been definitely proved. Poléjaeff,} indeed, gives a figure of a section of Leucosolenia poterium in which what are evidently intended for ectodermal cells appear, but the figure is very diagrammatic, and there appears to be no mention of the ectodermal cells anywhere in the letterpress. As a matter of fact I find that the ectoderm of the Homocela agrees precisely with what Schulze has described for Sycandra raphanus, and what I myself found and described in Grantia labyrinthica.| xcept in the case of very well preserved speci- mens it is a matter of great difficulty to make out satisfactorily the structure of the ectodermal epithelium. In cases, however, where the specimen has been at once immersed in a sufficient quantity of strong spirit and the sections carefully prepared by means of the paraffin method, care being taken to avoid overheating, the ectoderm generally appears in section as a delicate but sharp outline with a moniliform or beaded appearance due to the swelling caused by the presence of the nucleus in the centre of each cell. In my sections of Leucosolenia wilsoni, n. sp., for example, I found the ectoderm unusually well preserved. In sections vertical to the plane of its extension it presented the appearance described above (PI. VII., Figs. 2, 3), but where it happened to be cut tangentially, or sliced off, its true character could readily be seen (Pl. VII., Fig. 4). It consists of thin, flattened, plate-like cells, * Report on the Deep-Sea Keratosa of the ‘Challenger ’’ Expedition, p. 13. | Report on the Calcarea of the ‘ Challenger”? Expedition, Plate 3, Fig. 1. } ‘Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges, III.—On the Anatomy of Grantia labyrinthica, Carter, and the so-called I’amily Teichonidw.” Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, January, 1891. 8 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. polygonal in outline, and each with a swelling in the centre where the nucleus is situate. The cell itself averages about 0-0136 mm. in diameter, and the nucleus, which is very distinctly outlined and more or less spherical (or perhaps somewhat flattened in the same manner as the cell), has a diameter of about 0°0034 mm. Within the nucleus appear a few small, deeply staining granules. Around the nucleus the protoplasm is highly granular, exactly as described by Schulze, while towards the periphery of the cell it becomes gradually hyaline. Adjacent cells are in contact at the edges, and all together form a single-layered, continuous epithelium over the out- side of the Ascon-tube. As a rule, in ordinary preparations, although the nuclei and granules of the ectoderm cells may be clearly enough visible, it is very difficult to distinguish the outlines. Von Lendenfeld* observes: ‘‘The whole outer free surface of the Sponge is covered with a low Epithelium, consisting of flat covering cells, each of which may possess one swinging cilia.” ‘This author habitually figures cilia on the ectodermal cells both of calcareous and non-calcareous sponges, and it would be interesting to know if he has actually seen them or merely assumed their presence, perhaps from observing currents in the surrounding water. It does not seem to me probable that the ectodermal cells of the Calcarea Homoccela are ciliated. The Endoderm. According to Heckel} the cells (termed by Sollas ‘‘choanocytes” and by Carter ‘‘spongozoa,’” but generally known as ‘‘collared cells’) of which the endoderm in the Calearea Homoccela is entirely composed are so uniform in structure, not only amongst the Caleareous sponges but also in other groups, that the description of one species will serve for all. Until recently this has been the general view and it has become customary with some spongologists to figure the collared cells in their drawings like so many bricks in the plan of a building, apparently without taking the least trouble to investigate for themselves the true state of the case. No onecansuppose, for stance, that Poléjaeff ever saw the collared cells in the not too well preserved material at his disposal anything like so plainly or so regularly arranged as he figures them in his Reports on the Calcarea and Keratosa of the ‘‘Challenger’ Expedition. The structure of the collared cells having been made out by James-Clark,{ Carter,§ Heckel|| and Schulze{] in a few cases, it was assumed that all collared cells were the same, and * Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, Vol. 1X., Part 2, p. 318. “Die Kalkschwamme.” Vol. I. p. 137. “ Spongie ciliatz, as Infusoria flagellata.” Memoirs of the Boston Society of Natural History, Vol. i. Part 3, 1867. : “Notes Introductory to the Study and Classification of the Spongida.’ Annals and Magazine of Natural History. Ser. 4, Vol. xvi., 1875. || “ Die Kalkschwémme,”’ loc. cit. “| Loc. cit. Or ++ A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 9 spongologists seem to have thought themselves justified in figuring them in what was considered to be the orthodox manner whether they had been able to make out the structure or not. Certainly they were tolerably correct as to what may be called the typical form of the collared cell, and before passing on to describe the various modifications which have been shown to exist by more independent investi- gation we may with advantage describe the structure of this typical form. Typically, then, the collared cell consists of a rounded or sometimes cylindrical body produced above into a neck or collum. The neck is surmounted by a long, vibratile, whip-like flagellum, and the flagellum is surrounded by a very delicate, transparent, membranous collar which is usually more or less funnel-shaped and is inserted on the collum around the base of the flagellum. In the body of the cell is a large nucleus, provided sometimes, if not always, with a distinct nucleolus. ‘The protoplasm around the nucleus is more or less granular and sometimes contains, according to James-Clark, Carter and Heckel, one or more contractile vacuoles. Both collar and flagellum appear to be capable of complete retraction and in this retracted condition the collared cells are generally met with in sections. According to Carter* the collared cell (spongozoon), after removal from the body of the sponge, may be seen moving about the field of the microscope in the form of an Ameba, with or without the flagellum. It is not improbable that the amoeboid phase may also occur normally within the sponge. For further details and excellent figures I may refer the reader to the works of James-Clark, Carter, Heckel, and Schulze last quoted. In his article on Sponges in the “Encyclopedia Britannica” (lid. [X.), Sollas first showed that in some Tetractinellid forms a peculiar modification of the collared cells occurs, and he gives further details in his Report on the ‘‘ Challenger” Tetractinellida. This modification consists in the fusion of the margins of the collars of adjacent collared cells in such a manner as to form a distinct membrane, stretching from collar to collar and perforated by eireular apertures through which the flagella project. Soon after this I discovered the same membrane very clearly shown in a horny sponge (Carter’s Stelospongus flabelliformis), and proposed} for it the name ‘ Sollas’s membrane.” Bidder also mentioned} its existence in Caleareous sponges, a discovery confirmed by myself in the case of Grantia labyrinthica.\ So far, however, no one had been able to see both Sollas’s membrane and the flagella of the collared cells co-existent, but since then I have very clearly seen both at once in * Loc. cit. + “Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges, II.—On the Anatomy and Histology of Stelospongus Jlabelliformis, Carter; with Notes on the Development.” Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, December, 1888. | Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. VI., Part 4, p. 183. § “Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges, III.,”’ loc. cit. 10 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. preparations of the siliceous sponge Halichondria panicea.* Yor more detailed descriptions and illustrations of this remarkable modification of the collared cells in certain sponges I must refer the reader to the writings of Sollas and myself just quoted. Sollas, again,t has pointed out that in the calcareous sponges the collared cells are usually, if not always, larger than in other sponges, a statement which is supported by my own observations. According to Heckel, the collared cells in the Calearea range from 0-005 to 0:009 mm. in diameter, while in the non-calcareous sponges Sollas gives the diameter of the collared cells as only 0-003 mm. Enough has been said to show that the collared cells are not so uniform in structure in all sponges as has generally been supposed, and I must now make a few observations on the condition of these elements in the Calcarea Homoccela. We have seen above that the collared cell is a more or less polymorphic structure, and this polymorphism is exhibited mainly in a great readiness to withdraw the collar and flagellum into the protoplasmic body of the cell. The mere act of removing a sponge from the water and placing it in alcohol seems, as a rule, to be sufficient to cause the total retraction of the collars and flagella, and it is in this condition of retraction that the collared cells are generally found in microscopical preparations. Even in this state, however, they are readily recognisable. Exactly as the ectodermal cells form an epithelial membrane over the outside of the Ascon- tube, so the endodermal, collared cells form a continuous epithelium lining the inside of the tube. For the sake of clearness this liming of collared cells is coloured red in all the figures. When looked at from above or below this epithelium presents the appearance shown in the red-coloured portion of Figure 5, PI. VI. It consists of a number of retracted collared cells lying side by side. The individual cells are small, in Leucosolenia cavata, for example, measuring about 0:0085mm. in diameter. They usually appear more or less polygonal from mutual pressure, although at the same time, owing, doubtless, to shrinking caused by the action of reagents, they generally stand alittle apart from one another in the sections, so that the outline of each is distinctly visible. The nucleus of each cell is generally clearly visible ; in Leucosolenia cavata its diameter is only about half that of the cell itself. The collared cells, and especially the nucleus, stain deeply with the ordinary staining fluids, such as Borax Carmine and Kleinenberg’s Hematoxylin, and are thus rendered very conspicuous in stained preparations. The usual appearance of the collared cells, when seen in sections taken at right angles to the surface which they cover, is shown in Figure 4, Pl. VI. * «Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges, IV.—On the Flagellated Chambers and Ova of Halichondria panicea.” Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, January, 1891. } Article “Sponges.” Encyclopedia Britannica, Ed. 1X. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. ils In many cases the collared cells appear to be but very feebly attached to the underlying layer of mesoderm, and frequently they come away over large areas in the course of preparation. Hence, sometimes, they cannot be found at all. Occasionally, however, the collared cells are exceptionally well preserved and only partially retracted, even in ordinary sections prepared by the paraffin method. This is the case in one of my preparations of Leucosolenia proxima. Figure 3, Pl.VILI. shows three collared cells placed side by side in a row, and each one exhibits the characteristic collar still expanded. The collars are funnel-shaped or tubular, and come into contact at their margins, without, however, forming a distinct Sollas’s membrane. Of course in the case of collars which thus come into contact at their margins, a temporary fusion may take place as between any two naked masses of protoplasm, and in this manner Sollas’s membrane in all probability first arose. Between the bodies of the cells, filing up the interstices, a transparent substance is seen, which is probably part of the gelatinous ground substance of the mesoderm in which the bodies of the collared cells are partially embedded. Figure 4, Pl. VIII. shows another collared cell from the same preparation which has become entirely separated from the rest of the sponge and yet distinctly exhibits its tubular collar. None of these cells show the flagellum, which always seems to be retracted before the collar. The transverse diameter of the body of the collared cell is, in this species, scarcely 0:005mm., while the length of the body and collar taken together is 0°013mm. Even in the small group of the Calcarea Homoccela at least one interesting deviation from what may be regarded as the typical condition of the collared cells is found, and probably more will subsequently be shown to occur when the subject receives the attention which it deserves. ‘The peculiarity to which I now refer occurs in the very remarkable species Leucosolenia tripodifera, Carter sp., and is illustrated by Vigures 5and 6, PI.VIII. In the first place there is a well-developed Sollas’s membrane in the ordinary position. ‘The flagella of the cells are retracted, but the collars are in some cases well preserved and funnel-shaped. Their margins do not come into direct contact, but are united by the membrane, which runs from one to another at right angles to the long axes of the collars. In vertical sections this membrane appears as a thin, sharp line running parallel to the row of collared cells, and at a little distance (about the length of a collared cell body) from it (Fig. 6). Not only, however, is Sollas’s membrane present, but it presents in itself a very peculiar modification. Instead of being perfectly smooth the outer surface is thickly studded with delicate, rod-like processes of uniform length and projecting at right angles from it into the gastral cavity. ‘These processes are about 0-007 mm. in length and 0-0012 mm. in diameter ; they stain lightly and have a distinctly granular appearance ; they are arranged with great regularity and occur in specimens from different localities, so that they would appear to be of constant occurrence in the species. From their general appearance one 12 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. is at first tempted to imagine that they are bacilli, but their constancy and peculiar and regular arrangement argue strongly against this view. If, on the other hand, we suppose that Sollas’s membrane serves to catch or filter food particles from the streams of water flowing through the sponge, as maintained by Bidder and myself, then it seems possible that the curious rod-like processes in Leucosolenia tripodifera may be a further device for the same purpose. Such, at any rate, is the only explanation which I can offer of their presence, although I freely admit that it is far from being proved to be the correct one. The Mesoderm. The mesoderm consists of a gelatinous ground-substance in which are embedded the spicular skeleton and various cell-elements. The Ground-Substance.*—This is usually but feebly developed in the Calearea Homocela. It is doubtless of an inter-cellular nature and formed probably as a secretion of certain of the cells embedded in it, though to which of these cells it owes its origin we cannot with certainty say. Heckel, indeed, sayst that “it is secreted by the connective tissue cells of the mesoderm, which are derived originally from the primary exoderm cells,” and this view is probably correct. In the Homoceela, and, indeed, so far as we at present know, in all the Calcavea, the ground-substance is clear and transparent and destitute of the numerous granules so characteristic of many horny sponges (¢.g., Stelospongos flabelliformis). Upon the extent to which the sround-substance is developed depends the thickness of the mesodermal layer. In some species, é.g., Leucosolenia lucas: (P1. IV., Fig. 1) the mesoderm forms a very thin and inconspicuous layer. In others, however, such as L. stolonifer (PI. VL., Fig. 1), L. cavata (PI.VI., Fig. 4) and L. wilson: (P1. VII., Figs. 2, 3), it is much more strongly developed and forms a layer of considerable thickness. Immediately around each spicule the ground substance is concentrated in the form of a delicate “ spicule sheath,” visible as a distinct structureless membrane when the spicule itself is dissolved out by means of weak acids. The Mesodermal Cell-Elements—The different kinds of mesodermal cell-elements as yet recognised in the Calcarea Homoccela are as follows :— (1.) The ordinary multipolar or Stellate Connective Tissue Cells ave the most abundant. In Leucosolenia stolonifer, for example (P1.VI., Figs. 1, 3), these cells, though very small, are easily visible and plentiful. Each consists of a small, deeply staining, *“*Maltha” of Heckel. Report on the Deep-Sea Keratosa of the ‘‘ Challenger ’’ Expedition, p. 15. | Loe. cit. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 13 spherical nucleus, about 0:0025 mm. in diameter, around which is aggregated a small body of granular protoplasm running out in various directions into long, thread- like processes. Adjacent cells are united together by these processes so as to form a network, as in higher sponges. Similar cells are shown in the case of Leucosolenta cavata on Pl. VI., Figs. 4, 5. We may mention here a very remarkable development of the stellate connec- tive tissue cells which takes place in Leucosolenia proxima. In this sponge the cells in question, instead of all remaining embedded in the gelatinous ground-substance between the ectoderm and endoderm in the normal manner, have grown out between the collared cells of the endoderm into the gastral cavity, where they form a delicate network, as shown on PI. VIIT., Fig. 2. The cells composing this network are of very large size, but otherwise do not differ from normal multipolar mesoderm cells, They are nucleated and around the nucleus are a number of granules. Some of the proto- plasmic processes of the cells retain connection with the mesoderm of. the tube-wall, thus supporting the network in the gastral cavity. Such an extraordinary develop- ment of the mesoderm seems almost incredible, but it is far too distinct and obvious in my numerous sections of the sponge in question to admit of any doubt; moreover it leads on to a still further development in the same direction in an allied species (Leucosolenia wilsont), which will be fully described in dealing with the canal system. (2.) The Ameboid Cells (‘‘Wanderzellen’’ of German authors) are difficult to distinguish from the ordinary stellate ones, closely resembling the latter with the long processes cut off. They are somewhat more massive and rounded in outline. (3.) Lam not able to state with certainty whether or not sub-dermal Gland Cells occur in the Homocela. In Leucosolenia ventricosa, however, I have found certain elements resembling to a great extent the sub-dermal gland cells described by me* in Grantia labyrinthica, but I do not venture to express a definite opinion as to their nature. (4.) In some cases certain of the mesodermal elements become specially modified to form more or less plate-like Endothelial Cells. These occur in two distinct situations and differ in character accordingly. ‘The two kinds of mesodermal pavement cells (endothelial cells) which Thave as yet met with in the group are (a) the lining cells of the embryo-containing cavities and (b) the cells which ensheath the spicule-rays projecting into the gastral cavity. I have shown elsewhere} that in Sfelospongos the developing embryos are lodged in special cavities, excavated, as it were, in the substance of the mesoderm, and that * “Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges, IIT.,”’ &e. loc. cit. t ‘Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges, II.,”’ &e. loc. cit. 14 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. these cavities are lined by a single layer of gigantic pavement cells whose function appears to be to supply the growing embryo with nourishment. Poléjaeff* had previously called attention to ‘the extraordinary growth of the endothelial cells surrounding the growing embryos” in various horny sponges. Schulzet long since showed that the embryos of Sycandra raphanus lie in special cavities in the mesoderm lined by flattened pavement cells, and I have found the same thing in ° Grantia labyrinthica.t Butin neither of these two cases do the pavement cells of the embryo capsule exhibit anything remarkable in size or form, as in the horny sponges referred to above. Similar endothelial capsules occur around the ova of Leucosolenia pelliculata, but do not require further description. I have now, however, to record the occurrence, in Leucosolenia wilsom, of embryo capsules composed of large, thick, plate-like cells resembling, though on a smaller scale, those found in Stelospongos. The peculiar position of the embryos in Leucosolenia wilsont will be described later on, when we come to speak of the canal system. Suffice it now to observe that they le in spherical cavities excavated in the mesoderm. ‘The cavity itself is about 0°14 mm. in diameter, and is lined by a single layer of large, polygonal cells of unusual thickness (Pl. VII., Fig.3). Hach cell is about 0:028 mm. in diameter, and 0:009 mm. in thickness. The protoplasm composing it is highly granular and stains well. The nucleus is small and spherical, measuring only about 0:005 mm. in diameter; owing doubtless to the granular nature of the protoplasm surrounding it, it is not easy to make out. There can be no doubt that the function of these cells is to supply the developing embryo with nutriment, but I haye not seen any connection between them and the ectodermal cells of the embryo such as I have described in Stelospongos. We have next to deal with the endothelial cells which ensheath the spicule-rays projecting into the gastral cavity. In many Homoccela quadriradiate spicules are present, and the apical ray usually, if not always, projects through the layer of collared cells into the cavity of the Ascon-tube (gastral cavity). Probably in all cases this projecting ray is not naked, but clothed by an investing sheath of flattened, plate-like, nucleated cells. This cellular sheath is very distinctly shown in my preparations of Leucosolenia stolonifer (Pl. VI., Fig. 2), and again in Leucosolenia ivipodifera. If the spicule is dissolved out by means of weak acid, as happens in staining the preparations by the borax-carmine method, the cellular sheath is left as an empty, elongated, conical bag, hanging on to the wall of the gastral cavity. The cells composing the sheath somewhat resemble the cells of the ectoderm, and are arranged like them in a single layer. Their nuclei are very distinct, about 0°0034 mm. in * Report on the Keratosa of the “‘ Challenger ” Expedition, p. 52. wa t ue den Bau und die Entwicklung yon Sycandra raphanus Heckel.” Zeitschrift f. wissensch. Zoologie, ol. xxy. Suppl. { “Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges, III.,”’ &e. loc. cit. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 15 diameter, and stain deeply, but the actual outlines of the cells I have not been able to distinguish. The collared cells of the endoderm are not continued over this sheath, but, as shown in PI. VI., Figs. 1, 2, cease abruptly around its base. These structures must not be corfounded with the ordinary ‘ spicule sheath” always found investing Calcareous sponge-spicules (vide supra). The latter has been shown by Heckel* to ‘be simply a concentration of the gelatinous ground-substance immediately surrounding the spicule, and has no cellular structure. The origin of the cellular spicule sheaths is open to debate. I prefer at present to regard them as mesodermal structures, but, on the other hand, there is nothing to prove that they are not endodermal. If, however, they are endodermal then Lenden- feld’s emended diagnosis of the Homoccela as ‘‘Calcispongie the entoderm of which consists throughout of frilled flagellate cells,’ + will no longer hold good. ‘The spicules themselves are certainly mesodermal in origin, and if they can penetrate through the endoderm what is to prevent them from carrying with them an investment of mesodermal cells? Probably these cells are really calcoblasts, which secrete constant additions of carbonate of lime whereby the spicule is enabled to maintain its growth. It is not certain which of the mesodermal cells, as a general rule, function as calcoblasts (7.e., secrete the spicules), but I have elsewhere given it as my opinion that the ordinary stellate connective tissue cells do the greater part of the work. (5.) The next mesodermal elements of which we haye to speak are the Reproductive Cells. Schulze,§ Polejaeff,|| and others have shown that the ova and spermatozoa in Calcareous (and, indeed, other) sponges develop in the mesoderm, and are formed directly from the amceboid cells (** Wanderzellen”’). The ovum is formed simply by increase in yolume of the amceboid cell and the spermatozoon by a process of fission; for further details of these processes, I must refer to the works of Schulze and Poléjaeff just quoted. The spermatozoa I have not seen, at any rate in the Calearea Homoceela, but we may assume that they resemble more or less closely those described by Poléjaeff in Sycandra raphanus, consisting of a very minute spherical head and a very long and slender tail (0°03 mm. long). * Die Kalkschwiimme.”’ {| Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, Vol. IX., Part 4, p. 1083. | In my memoir on the Anatomy of Grantia labyrinthica (loc. cit. supra) I have proposed to distinguish between two kinds of spicule-secreting cells, or calcoblasts, in the Caleareous sponges, viz., primary calcoblasts, within which the spicules take their origin as in mother cells, and secondary calcoblasts, which add successive layers of carbonate of lime to the spicule after it has once been formed. I am not aware that anyone has ever yet seen a primary calcoblast, but their existence is rendered probable by the analogy of siliceous sponges, in which the smaller spicules are often seen within mother cells (primary silicoblasts). ‘The ordinary stellate connective tissue cells, or some of them, probably function as secondary calcoblasts, as also do the endothelial cells ensheathing the rays of spicules which project into the gastral cavity. § ‘Ueber den Bau und die Entwicklung yon Sycandra raphanus Heckel.” Zeitschrift f. wissensch, Zoologie, Vol. XXV. Suppl. || ‘Ober das Sperma und die Spermatogenese hei Sycanda raphanus Heekel.” (* Aus. dem LXXXVI. Bande der Sitzb. der k, Akad, der Wissensch., 1 Abth. Noy. — Helt, Jahrg., 1882.) 16 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. The ova, on the other hand, are easily recognisable, and frequently met with in preparations. Figure 4, Plate VI., for example, shows an ovum of Lezcosolenia cavata, lying in the gelatinous ground-substance of the mesoderm beneath the layer of collared cells. This ovum is simply a very large ameceboid cell, about 0.025 mm. im its longer diameter, with an oval form and avery distinct nucleus about 0-006 mm. in diameter. The nucleus is granular, and stains (in this case) more deeply than the surrounding protoplasm, which is also granular. Around this ovum are congregated a number of other mesodermal cells (probably amceboid) of much smaller size. These are probably the commencement of the characteristic capsule which seems generally to surround the developing embryo of calcareous sponges. Possibly the particular ovum here described is not adult, for it does not present quite the characteristic appearance of a ripe calcisponge ovum. In a specimen of Leucosolenia pelliculata, however, I found very numerous mature ova of much more characteristic structure, and these may be taken as a type for the whole group. In this species the wall of the Ascon-tube is very thin, and the mesoderm is but feebly developed. The mature ova, on the other hand, are very large, their shorter diameter measuring two or three times the thickness of the wall of the tube. Hence, wherever an ovum occurs, the tube-wall is swollen out, and the swelling always projects inwards, into the gastral cavity, and not outwards, for the ovum hes inside the layer of rigid spicules composing the skeleton of the sponge. Hence the layer of collared cells lining the gastral cavity is lifted up into a mound-like swelling over each ovum, exactly as I have described in the case of the developing embryos of Grantia labyrinthica.* Moreover, the ovum already lies in a distinct cavity lined by a delicate endothelial membrane just like the embryo capsule of Sycandra raphanus or Grantia labyrinthica. ~ The ovum itself (PI. VIIL., Fig. 7) is usually irregularly oval in longitudinal section, flattened on the side which lies next to the spicules and swollen out on the other. It measures about 0-085 mm. in longest diameter. The nucleus is very large, and its shape appears to follow that of the ovum to which it belongs; its longer diameter measures about 0-042 mm. in length ; it lies pretty nearly in the centre of the ovum. There is always one very large spherical nucleolus whose position in the nucleus varies. It lies sometimes towards one end, sometimes to the side, and in one case I distinctly saw the nucleolus lying half inside the nucleus and half in the surrounding proto- plasm. The nucleolus is about 0-01 mm. in diameter. With regard to the more minute structure of these different parts of the ovum we must notice that the body of the ovum (7.e., the part outside the nucleus) is a naked mass of coarsely granular protoplasm which stains very deeply. The-nucleus is enclosed in a very distinct * «On the Pseudogastrula Stage in the De al : ” : i i Victoria, 1889, p. 93, g velopment of Calcareous Sponges.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 17 nuclear membrane, which stains deeply, and it is itself composed of a much more finely granular material which stains less deeply than the outside protoplasm. The nucleolus stains more deeply than any other part and appears to be homogeneous and devoid of structure. In addition to the large nucleolus there are generally visible in the nucleus a number of very much smaller bodies resembling the nucleolus in appearance, but it is doubtful whether they have really the same composition as the latter, especially when we compare them with similar bodies in the ovum of Lewcoso- lenia depressa, which I propose to describe next. In my only specimen of Leucosolenia depressa adult ova are extremely abundant. Like the embryos in the closely allied species, Lewcosolenia wilsoni, the ova are imbedded in the mesodermal tissue which in part blocks up the cavities of the Ascon-tubes (gastral cavities), but there is no definite layer of large, plate-like, nutritive cells around each. Such may, however, be formed later on as the embryo develops. The ova are of great size, measuring 0°17 mm. in longer diameter, and, as is usually the case with the ova of the same sponge, are all in very much the same state of development and resemble one another closely. Figure 8, Plate VIII., repre- sents a section of one of these ova. ‘The outline of the section is indicated by the dotted line and, to save labour, only a portion of the protoplasm outside the nucleus is filled in. ‘The ova vary somewhat in shape and may be described as irregularly spherical. Owing to the absence of spicules from the surrounding tissues they are not definitely flattened on one side as in Leucosolenia pelliculata. The nucleus is very large indeed, 0:076 mm. in diameter, and approximately spherical. The nucleolus is distinct and also spherical, 0°0085 mm. in diameter. Within the nucleolus several small, highly refringent granules are visible. The body of the ovum, outside the nucleus, 1s composed (principally at any rate) of distinct, closely packed, more or less spherical granules, each about 0-003 mm. in diameter ; the whole forming a deeply-staining mass. The nucleus is composed as usual of a very finely granular and less deeply-staining substance, and is invested in a very distinct, deeply-staining membrane. Just inside this membrane, and for the most part touching it, lies an irregular row of spherical granules closely resembling in size and other characters the granules of the outer protoplasm. ‘These granules occur in the some position with great constancy in all the ova, and form a character- istic and conspicuous feature. They look as if they were granules belonging to the outer protoplasm which have actually passed through the nuclear membrane. Whether this passage is normal or pathological (due to reagents) I know not. In Leucosolema pelliculata we have already seen similar granules, but they are not arranged with anything like the same regularity around the inside of the nuclear membrane, nevertheless a tendency towards such arrangement may sometimes be observed, as is shown in Figure 7, Plate VIII. In the latter species also I noticed, as 18 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. described above, the nucleolus itself half in and half out of the nucleus, and this fact supports the supposition that the granules of the outer protoplasm may under certain circumstances pass through the nuciear membrane (in the opposite direction to that in which the nucleolus appeared to be travelling). Another feature of considerable interest in the ova of Leucosolenia depressa is the presence im the nucleus of distinct traces of a nuclear network, composed of very delicate, branching and anastomosing threads, which seem to stain more darkly than the surrounding protoplasm, and appear somewhat as shown in the figure. These examples may suffice to illustrate the structure of the ovum of the Calearea Homoccela, and indeed, of calcareous sponges in general.* Although the adult sponge is generally admitted to be amongst the simplest and most lowly of organisms, the ovum appears to be possessed of a complexity of structure far beyond what might be expected, and this complexity appears especially to concern the nucleus. Such then are the various cell-elements which take part in the formation of the -mesoderm of the Calcarea Homocela, but in addition to these there occur in the mesoderm of Leucosolenia cavata a great number of bodies whose nature is still a matter of conjecture, but which may be conveniently described in this place. Yellow Granules —The bodies in question lie embedded in large numbers and grouped at fairly regular intervals in the mesoderm beneath the layer of collared cells (Pl. VI., Figs. 4 and 5); they consist of spherical granules (perhaps small cells), mostly aggregated in very definite clusters and each with a dark spot in its centre (nucleus ?). The arrangement of the granules in each aggregation is peculiar and characteristic. First they may be arranged in a solid heap of comparatively small size, about 0:025 mm. in diameter. This appears to be an immature condition (Pl. VI., Fig. 5). Sometimes there appears in such a heap a dark area resembling a nucleus, which seems to indicate that the whole mass of granules may be originally a single nucleated cell. Then the granules, each about 0°0023 mm. in diameter, appear to spread themselves out, so that in the next stage, which I regard as the more advanced condition, they form a ring surrounding an empty, discoid or sometimes crescentic space (Pl. VI., Fig. 5). One side of the ring appears to be always thicker (7.¢., composed of more granules) than the other, which may be composed of only a single row of granules. The diameter of this annular ageregation of small cells or granules is about 0-034 mm. * For further particulars as to the ova of sponges vide Dendy, ‘‘ Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges,” III. and IV., loc. cit. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 19 The nature of these “yellow granules,” as I propose to call them, is extremely enigmatical and the first question which presents itself is, do they really belong to the sponge in which they are found or are they parasitic or symbiotic organisms ? There are two arguments in favour of the view that they really belong to the sponge. (1) They occur in great numbers, arranged in the same manner and having the same characteristic structure in all specimens of Leucosolema cavata that I have examined, so much so as to form one of the most striking characteristics of the species. (2) They bear a rather striking resemblance to the developing flagellated chambers described by me in the embryo of Stelospongos flabelliformis.* On the other hand there are very serious arguments against this view. (1) They are only known to occur in this species and, perhaps, in Lewcosolenia coriaceat and L.. osculuim (vide infra) (I find them also in L. dubia but it is not impossible that that ‘“‘species’” may be a young form of L. cavata.) (2) With the exception of the structures already mentioned in the embryos of Sfe/ospongos flabelliformis they are unlike any other structures found in sponges, and it is scarcely conceivable that they can be developing flagellated chambers, or masses of collared cells, because the true collared cells in L. cavata are plainly visible, altogether different in appearance and distributed in a totally different manner. The idea that they might form a kind of accessory chambers at one time commended itself to me but I can see nothing to warrant such a supposition ; moreover the crescentic or discoid space in the centre of the annular group of granules shows no connection with the canal system of the sponge. (8) The behaviour of the granules towards reagents is not altogether what one would expect if they were really sponge-cells. Their colour, when mounted in balsam without staiming, is distinctly yellowish. They stain well, however, with hematoxylin. When treated with solution of iodine alone, or with iodine and sulphuric acid, no blue colour is discernible, but when fragments of the sponge are boiled in caustic potash solution for the purpose of isolating the spicules the yellow granules withstand the action of the potash and appear in the preparations of the spicules. This last observation leads me to * «Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges, II. &c.” Quart. Journ. Micro. Sei., Dee. 1888 (vide especially Pl. XXXIII. Fig. 23.) + In a paper in the Annals and Magazine of Natural History for July 1884 (pp. 21, 22), Mr. Carter describes certain granular bodies in Bowerbank’s Leucosolenia coriacea which must I think be of a similar nature to the yellow granules of Leucosolenia cavata. He deseribes them fully, but unfortunately without figures; the description runs as follows :— “Taking the granule singly, it is spherical, translucent, and glairy, glistening from refraction of light, of a faint yellow tinge, and varying under 1-6000th of an inch in diameter, although rarely attaining this size in this state. They are, when in sitw, congregated round a nucleated cell (the ‘ Kern’) which is often so indistinct here as to be very difficult to see, owing to its delicate (? polymorphic) structure and the opaque mass which the granules form when closely applied to it in juxtaposition; or they are scattered throughout the syncytium in the same way as in the Foraminifera 0 Todine does not turn them purple, nor does liquor potasse dissolve them; but strong nitric acid appears to destroy their sphericity, which may be brought back again by the addition of liquor potassw. ‘This glairy refractive appearance gives them the aspect of fat or albumen; while, like the green granules in Spongilla, they appear in the sulphur-yellow and scarlet varieties of Grantia clathrus (—=Le ucosolenia coriacea] to be the seat of these colours respectively, when they might be termed ‘pigmental.’ It is possible that they grow into the larger cells of the protoplasm (the ‘ Kerne’), from which they appear to be derived, when they may fulfil other offices, . . » But whatever the oflice of the granules may be no one as yet has demonstrated beyond conjecture what they fare or what purpose they may subserve either in the sponges or in the Rhizopoda,—so they are still called ‘ the granules.’ 20 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. suppose them to be of vegetable nature. The iodine-sulphuric acid test is to my mind by no means a conclusive one, and in spite of my failure to detect starch or cellulose by its means I am inclined to favour the view that these very characteristic and remarkable bodies are symbiotic alge. To judge from a passage in Mr. Carter’s description of Leucosolenia (Clathrina) cavata* and from the fact that the yellow granules occur abundantly in a specimen of that sponge sent by him to the British Museum and thence to me, I think that Mr. Carter must have seen them. The passage referred to runs as follows :—‘ Structure that above mentioned, whose staple is the ‘ tubulated thread,’ of which the wall is very thin and skeletally composed of a single layer of radiate spicules held together by sarcode supporting the softer parts, which here appear to consist chiefly of a layer of spongozoa in juxtaposition, and not gathered into the form of ampullaceous sacs, together with a remarkable quantity of those organs which consist of nucleated cells surrounded by an abundance of glistening spherical granules, which Heckel has figured and named ‘nucle’ (Kerne) of his ‘ Syncytium.’” The portion of the passage italicised leaves no doubt in my mind that Mr. Carter refers to the yellow granules, but he is probably mistaken in supposing that they have anything to do with the nuclei of Heckel’s “‘ Syncytium.” The latter are simply the nuclei of the various cells which compose the ectoderm and mesoderm, and these also are clearly visible in my preparations of Leucosolenia cavata (PI. VI., Fig. 5). The Skeleton—Having now discussed all the cell-elements which occur embedded in the ground-substance of the mesoderm, we come next to the skeleton. The skeleton of all caleareous sponges consists of isolated spicules never united together into fibres or networks as in the siliceous forms. We will first speak of the spicules themselves and then of their arrangement. The excellent researches of von Ebnert+ have recently thrown much light upon the physical nature of the calcareous sponge-spicule. According to this author the spicule contains no organic basis, but is a crystalline formation, composed chiefly of calespar, but with an admixture of other salts :—‘‘ Die Nadeln der Kalkschwaémme sind hauptsichlich aus Kalkspath bestehende, keine organische Substanz enthaltende Individuen von Mischkrystallen, deren diussere Form—ohne Begrenzung durch wahre Krystallflachen—yon der specifischen Thatigkeit eines lebenden Organismus bedingt ist und deren innere Structur, obwohl vollstindig krystallinisch, durch eine * “Annals and Magazine of Natural History,” June, 1886, p. 502. t “Uber den feineren Bau der Skelettheile der Kalkschwimme nebst Bemerkungen iiber Kaikskelete iiberhaupt.” (‘‘ Aus dem XCY. Bande der Sitzb. der kais. Akad. der Wissensch. I. Abth. Mirz-Heft., Jahrg. 1887.’’) A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 21 eigenthiimliche Vertheilung der Gemengtheile mit der ausseren Form in Beziehung steht.” The spicules, as already stated, are formed as secretions of certain mesodermal cells, and each is invested by a very delicate organic sheath which is, however, no part of the spicuie itself, but simply a concentration of the gelatinous sround-substance surrounding it. Three, and only three, main forms of spicules occur amongst the Calcarea, and all three occur amongst the Homocela. They are—(1) The triradiate spicules, which are by far the commonest, and which seem to be the primitive form amongst the Calearea. (2) The quadriradiate spicules. (3) The oxeote spicules. Trivadiate Spicules—Wach consists of three rays or arms radiating from a common centre. Of these spicules Heckel distinguishes* three groups—(1) Regular trivadiates, in which the three angles and the three rays are alike. (2) Sagittal trivadiates, in which two of the angles, or two of the rays, form a pair, while the third is in some way different. (3) Irregular trivadiates, in which the three rays, or the three angles, or both, are al] unlike. ‘This classification is convenient ; but it must be carefully borne in mind that the three types are not sharply defined, but merge insensibly into one another, so that it is often impossible to say, without very exact measurement, to which of the three groups a particular spicule should be referred. In the simplest cases the rays of the spicule are straight, and generally sharp- pointed at the extremity. Frequently, however, they become more or less curved. The curvature may take place either in the plane of the three rays, as, for example, in the case of many sagittal spicules, where the two paired rays often curve either towards or away from one another; or the rays may curve in such a manner that if the spicule be laid on a level surface it will rest on the apices of the rays only, with the centre of the spicule elevated to a greater or less extent. An excellent example of this latter kind of curvature is shown in the so-called ‘ tripod-spicules’’ of Leucosolenia tripodifera (Pl. XI., Fig. 5). Amongst the Calcarea Homoccela I have frequently noticed that the spicules on the outside of a sponge colony are more robust, and also exhibit a greater degree of curvature than those in the interior (c.g., Leucosolenia tripodifera). In the sagittal triradiates the two paired rays are known as the /aéeral or oral rays, the angle between them as the oval angle and the unpaired ray as the basal ray. Quadriradiate Spicules.—With Heckel, I regard the quadriradiate spicule as a derivative of the triradiate, and the fourth ray, which projects from the centre of the spicule in a plane at right angles to that of the other three, as a secondary develop- * «Die Kalkschwiimme.’”’ Vol. I., p. 187. 22, A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. ment. The three primary rays are spoken of by Heckel as the facial rays, and the fourth as the apical ray. As in the case of the triradiates the quadriradiate spicules may be classified as recular, sagittal and irregular. In some species triradiate spicules pass almost insensibly into quadriradiates, the apical ray appearing first as a tiny wart in the centre of the spicule, and only a very few quadriradiates occurring amongst a vast majority of triradiates. Sometimes only one or two quadriradiates can be found in a preparation, and it is quite impossible to be certain, from the mere fact that no quadriradiates at all can be found, that none exist in the sponge. Hence the hopelessness of attempting to classify the Calcarea by their spicules alone or even principally. Oxeole Spicules (Oxea).—I use this term for the spicules named by Heckel “¢ Stabnadeln,” because they resemble in form the siliceous spicules to which the term ‘“‘oxeote’’ was originally applied by Mr. Ridley and myself in our Report on the Monaxonida of the ‘Challenger’ Expedition. The oxeote spicule has only a single axis, and thus consists of a simple rod which, in its most typical condition, is spindle- shaped and pointed at the two ends, which are precisely similar. ‘This typical condition, however, is seldom found, ‘The spicule is nearly always curved, and one end is nearly always of different shape to the other. It appears to me, however, useless to attempt to give special names to all the varieties of oxeote spicules. Further details as to the forms assumed by the spicules in different species are unnecessary in this place, the nomenclature having been explained I must refer the student for further particulars to Heckel’s monograph and to the systematic portion and illustrations of the present memoir (Plates IX., X., XI.). With regard to the arrangement of the spicules in the Calecarea Homoccela there are one or two points of general interest which offer themselves for consideration. In the simplest case the skeleton consists of triradiates only, placed side by side with considerable regularity in a single layer in the thickness of the mesoderm. If the spicule be sagittal it is so placed that the lateral rays and oral angle are directed towards the osculum and the basal ray towards the base of the sponge. If quadri- radiates be present they appear nearly always to be so placed that the apical ray projects through the endoderm into the gastral cavity, generally curving upwards towards the osculum, and thus affording a protection against the entrance of parasites. If, on the other hand, oxeote spicules be present, they seem always to lie nearer to the ectoderm than either the triradiates or quadriradiates, and very commonly one end,which is usually slenderer and more sharply pointed than the other, projects outwards and upwards through the ectoderm, forming a protection to the outside of the sponge. The position and arrangement of these three kinds of spicules is well illustrated in Leucosolenia lucasi (Pl. IV., Fig. 1). A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 23 C.—Taer Canat System oF THE CaLtcAREA Homocaia As ILLUSTRATED BY THE VICLORIAN SPECIES. The portion of our subject with which we have now to deal is perhaps the most difficult. We have already described the Olynthus type, and have seen that it consists essentially of a narrow, thin-walled tube, open at one end only. Now the question before us is—Given a narrow tube capable of indefinite elongation and capable also of branching and anastomosing to an indefinite extent, to determine how mary different forms the sponge colony resulting therefrom may assume. It will be seen that under the term ‘“‘canal system” I include not only the canal system of the individual Ascon-person, but also that of the sponge colony as a whole. This 1s necessary, for in some cases, as we shall see (e.g., Leucosolenia cavata), the individuals of which the colony is composed are so intimately united together that we can no longer disentangle them, and we cannot treat of the canal system of one Ascon-tube without at the same time treating of that of its neighbours; indeed, the individuals no longer have each its own canal system, but the colony has a canal system common to them all. The canal system of the colony is of course determined by the manner in which the individual Ascon-tubes are united together, and hence in describing the canal system we must at the same time describe the form of the colony, and vice versd. In the more complex forms of Calcarea Homoccela it is almost as impossible to recognise individuals as it is in the most highly developed sponges such as the Keratosa, and the term canal system is equally applicable, with the same significance, to both. The Olynthus is the individual unit of the sponge, and must be regarded as a single animal developed directly from: a smele ovum. It may in fact be compared to a Hydra. But the Olynthus has generally, like the Hydra, a strong tendency to form buds or branches, but, unlike in Hydra, these branches never separate from the parent. ‘They form with the parent permanent colonies, as in such hydroids as Obelia. Still we have no difficulty as yet in distinguishing the individuals (Ascon- persons) which compose the sponge colony from one another, each is only connected with its fellows at the base, and each has its own gastral cavity and its own osculwm. But now the different members of each colony begin to branch more and more, and to fuse with one another wherever the branches come in contact, communications being established at these points between adjacent gastral cavities. Thus more or less complex networks of tubes are formed, and every chance of distinguishing between the individual ‘persons’? which compose the colony is lost. We only know, from analogy, that the whole sponge is a colony, and not a single individual. In this anastomosis of the different members of the colony to form complex networks, and their consequent loss of individuality, the sponge colony differs widely from the 24 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. hydroid colony. The connection between the individuals which compose the colony is a far more intimate one than in any other colonial metazoa. The entire colony now behaves as one individual, it has its own characteristic size and shape, its own exhalant openings (oscula* or pseudoscula) and its own inhalant pores (psewdopores) and external skin (pseudoderm). We must now describe in detail the principal modifications which the sponge colony, and as a direct consequence the canal system of the colony, present amongst the Victorian Calcarea Homoccela. According to the modifications in the form of the colony and of the canal system I propose to divide the genus Lewcosolenia, which with Poléjaeff and Vosmaer I regard as the sole genus of Homoccela, into three sections, Simplicia, Reticulata, and Radiata. We will deal with these divisions in order, beginning with the least complex. Section |. smMPLicra. The Simplicia include such simple Olynthus types as never form colonies, and also those colonial forms in which the whole colony consists of individuals (Ascon-persons) which may branch, but which never form complex anastomoses nor give off radial tubes, so that the individuality of the different members of the colony is always recognisable. As already stated, no species which permanently retain the simple Olynthus form have been met with amongst the Victorian Sponges, The simplest form which we have appears to be Leucosolenia lucasi. This sponge is very minute, the individuals (Ascon-persons) of which the colony is composed measuring only about 2 or 3 mm. in length and O°7 mm. in diameter. The colony increases by budding, the buds appearing on the parent tube first as blind outgrowths, which subsequently develop each an osculum at its free end. Hence the whole colony forms a loose, branching mass of indefinite size and shape, attached to some foreign object. A portion of such a colony is represented on Plate I., Figure 1. Each individual tube resembles an Olynthus except that instead of being closed at its lower extremity it remains in open communication with its neighbours. ‘The minute structure of a single individual is shown on Plate IV., Figure 1. It consists of a thin-walled, sub-cylindrical or sometimes nearly conical tube with a wide osculum *The osculum of a compound sponge is not strictly homologous with the osculum of an Olynthus, but corresponds to a number of Olynthus oscula run together. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 25 at its upper extremity. ‘The thin wall of the tube is perforated by numerous circular inhalant pores (prosopyles) placed in the intervals between the spicules and leading directly from the exterior into the gastral cavity. The diameter of the prosopyles in the spirit-preserved specimen is about 0°01 mm. but they may have been a good deal larger in life, (According to Heckel* the inhalant pores |Twbi porales| are not permanent structures but appear and disappear again in the living sponge with no regularity. They appear in any part of the tube wall simply by a process of shrinking away of the surrounding soft tissues. The ectoderm appears to be the first part to give way and the endoderm the last. Then they disappear again by a reversal of the process, the collared cells being the last to close in and resume their original position. When they have closed completely no trace is left of their existence. Hence it happens that in spirit-preserved specimens the prosopyles are often not visible ; they are completely closed. In other cases their position is indicated only by gaps in the layer of collared cells, the ectoderm and the mesoderm only having closed in. The diameter of the fully open prosopyles is usually, according to Heckel, from 0:01-0:02 mm.) The number of the prosopyles is very great, as will be seen by reference to Figure 1, Plate IV. A slight advance in complexity is exhibited by Leucosolenia stolonifer. Here the individual Ascon-persons arise from a creeping, tubular, stolon-like structure (the spongorhiza) which spreads over the substratum on which the colony is growing in every direction. The spongorhiza may perhaps be regarded as the parent of the colony, it grows horizontally itself but its buds (the younger Ascon-persons) grow upwards and become much wider in diameter than the parent tube. The parent spongorhiza also produces short downward outgrowths which serve to attach the colony to the substratum on which it grows (Pl. L., Fig. 2). A strong tendency to form a spongorhiza is also exhibited in Leucosolenia lucasi but is not so well marked as in L. stolonifer. ‘The spongorhiza is comparable to the similar structure (iydrorhiza) found in many hydroids. The upright Ascon-persons of Leucosolenia stolonifer resemble those of L. lucast except in their very much greater size and inthe greater thickness of the tube wall. They rarely branch or anastomose, and, except when very young, each one is provided with a wide terminal osculum ; the youngest individuals end blindly. When fully grown they attain a height of about 35 mm., and a diameter of about 3°5 mm.; they narrow slightly towards the osculum. Owing to the unusual thickness of the Ascon- tube wall the inhalant pores are somewhat different from those of L. ducasi. They are no longer simply circular apertures perforating a thin membrane. ‘The wall of the tube averages about 0:14 mm. in thickness, and its outer surface is extremely uneven. Numerous wide apertures, or depressions, lead into irregular canals in the thickness * “Die Kalkschwimme” Vol. I., p. 220, et seq. 26 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. of the wall. These canals, after branching slightly and diminishing greatly in diameter, terminate in small openings (the true prosopyles), only about 0-02 mm. in diameter, which perforate the layer of collared cells (Pl. VI., Fig. 1). The elongation of the inhalant pores into distinct canals is due to the unusual thickness of the mesoderm. Since these canals appear to be lined by an ingrowth of the ectodermal epithelium they are probably more permanent structures than is usually the case with the inhalant pores of the Calcarea Homoccela. Possibly they are capable of opening and closing only at the gastral end (prosopyle) where they perforate the layer of collared cells. Section I]. ReTIcULATA. In this section of the genus the sponge colony forms a more or less complex network of branching and anastomosing tubes, and it is no longer possible to distinguish the individual Ascon-persons of which the colony is composed. The canal system presents great variations within the section, and before proceeding to describe individual examples it will be as well to give an outline scheme of the chief types, of which I recognise six, and which I propose to distinguish as_ types A, B, C, D, HE, F of the reticulate form of canal system. These six types of canal system may be arranged in two groups, which I propose to regard as subsections of the Reticulata, and to term Indivisa and Subdivisa respectively. Subsection 1. IJndivisa. The gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes composing the colony retain the primitive hollow condition, there being no ingrowth of the mesoderm or endoderm. Division 1.—The colony forms a loose network of tubes (Ascon-tubes) still well separated from one another, and without a common investing skin (pseudoderm). Hence there are no definite pseudopores. Type A., with the characters of the division. Example.—Leucosolenia dubia, n. sp. Dwision 2.—The colony is formed of tubes (Ascon-tubes) branching and anastomosing in a very complex manner. The whole colony forms a compact mass, and the outer walls of the outer tubes generally become specially thickened and contain specially large spicules, forming a more or less definite investing skin (pseudoderm). This skin is perforated by numerous small apertures, the pseudopores, which communicate with the narrow interspaces between the Ascon- A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 21 tubes in the interior of the colony. The pseudoderm is also perforated by larger exhalant openings (oscula or pseudoscula). Subdivision 1.—The exhalant openings, through which the water leaves the sponge, are true oscula, z.e., they lead directly into a space lined by collared cells and formed by the union of a number of Ascon- tubes. Type B., canal system normal. E-xanples.—Leucosolenta stipitata, n. sp. Leucosolenia pulcherrima, ni. sp. Type C., canal system reversed. Example.—Leucosolenia cavata, Carter sp. Subdivision 2.—The exhalant openings through which the water leaves the sponge are pseudoscula, z.c., they lead at first into a space not lined by collared cells, but, presumably, by ectoderm. This space is a pseudogaster, it really lies outside the colony and is formed probably by the upgrowth of the colony around it. The Ascon-tubes open into the pseudogaster. Type D., with the characters of the subdivision. Example.—Leucosolenia ventricosa, Carter sp. Subsection 2. Subdivisa. The gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes are more or less subdivided into incomplete chambers by ingrowths of mesoderm, or of both mesoderm and endoderm. Type -.—The collared cells have not yet spread in over the ingrowths of mesoderm. Example.—Leucosolenia proxima, n. sp. Type .—The collared cells have spread in over the ingrowths of mesoderm. Examples.—Leucosolenia wilsont, nu. sp. Leucosolenia depressa, lL. Sp. Having thus briefly reviewed the six types of canal system which I have found amongst the Victorian reticulate Homocela we may pass on to describe somewhat more in detail an example of each. 28 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. Type A.—-Leucosolenia dubia consists of a network of tubes spreading in many planes and varying in the closeness of its meshes not only in different specimens but even in different parts of the same colony. Figure 3, Plate I., represents a small portion of a colony enlarged four times. We cannot of course distinguish the Ascon-persons of which the colony is composed, we can only distinguish between what I propose to call Ascon-tubes and interspaces. The Ascon-tubes are of course lined by collared cells (endoderm) and the interspaces by ectoderm. Although the interspaces in the outer portions of the colony (and indeed also in the inner portions) are often no wider than the Ascon-tubes themselves yet no definite external skin (pseudoderm) is formed, and hence no definite pseudopores. The structure of the Ascon-tube is the same asin the Homoccela Simplicia. It is cylindrical and about 0-5 to 1 mm. in diameter, but varies a good deal in different parts of the same colony. True oscula are occasionally visible on the upper surface of the colony. ‘Two or three Ascon-tubes open by the same osculum and the diameter of the latter is rather less than that of an Ascon-tube. The prosopyles are not visible in my specimens, they are probably closed. As the thickness of the tube-wall is unusually great (about 0-1 mm.) the inhalant pores must be elongated, probably they resemble those of Leucosolema stolontfer described above. Type B.—The simplest example of this type is afforded by Leucosolenta stipitata. The entire colony is only about 8 mm. in height and is perched on the summit of a short stalk. Figures 4, 5, 6, Plate I., show the external form. The colony consists of a network of Ascon-tubes so disposed that there is one main tube running vertically through the centre of the colony, into which the remaining tubes debouch. The main tube is probably not to be regarded as the parent stock from which the others have been budded out but as formed by the fusion of a number of tubes to form a single axial cavity. Itis lined throughout by collared cells and ends at the summit of the colony in a single, wide, true osculum. Figure 2, Plate IV., shows a vertical section through the colony, in which the relations of the different Ascon-tubes is made clear. Irom this it will be seen that tie interspaces are necessarily confined to the peripheral portions of the colony. The outer tubes of the colony are very wide and the interspaces between them correspondingly small, hence there is a common pseudoderm formed by the outer walls of the outer tubes, in which the interspaces appear as definite pseudopores (Pl. I., Fig. 6). The pseudoderm is strengthened by spicules of somewhat greater size than those found in the interior of the colony. ‘The walls of the Ascon-tubes are very thin and the prosopyles are very clearly visible in my stained preparations both in the inner and outer tubes of the colony ; they are circular apertures about 0-02 mmm. in diameter. Another good illustration of this type is found in Leucosolenia pulcherrima, the only point of difference to notice as regards the canal system being the presence A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 29 of several true oscula instead of a single one, but this character is probably not constant. Figure 7, Plate I., shows the external form of the colony and Figure 3, Plate IV., the arrangement of the canal system. Type C.—The only example which I know of this very remarkable, reversed type of canal system is afforded by Lewcosolenia cavata. This sponge forms large, massive colonies (Pl. II., Fig. 7) which may attain a height of four or five inches (100 or 125 mm.) The colony is characteristically flattened from side to side and also on the upper surface. Onthe upper surface are a large number of true oscula, each surrounded by a membranous collar (Pl. V., Fig. 1). Between the oscula are a few small pseudopores but the majority of the pseudopores occur on the sides of the colony as little oval openings closely scattered all over the well-developed pseudoderm (PI. II., Fig. 7). The lowermost portion of the colony, which is also the oldest portion and the part attached to the substratum on which the sponge grows, consists of a number of well separated, although branching and anastomosing Ascon-tubes, In short, the first-formed part of the colony retains the comparatively simple form of type A (e.g., Leucosolenia dubia), except that the Ascon-tubes for the most part grow vertically upwards, being connected together by cross-branches. In this first-formed portion of the colony there is no difficulty in distinguishing between Ascon-tubes and interspaces, the latter are wide, and there is no investing skin (pseudoderm) around the outer portion of the colony, and hence no definite pseudopores. But now as the colony grows older and larger a remarkable change im the mutual relations of the Ascon-tubes and interspaces takes place. ‘This change affects only the newly formed portions of the colony, and leaves the old portion at the base in its original condition. The change takes place somewhat as follows:—As the young Ascon-tubes grow upwards the outer members of the colony fuse together so that their outer walls form a definite pseudoderm, leaving small apertures, the pseudopores, which still place the interspaces inside the colony in communication with the outside world. At the same time all the Ascon-tubes, outer and inner, increase in diameter and become extremely irregular in form, branching and anastomosing very freely. In proportion as the Ascon-tubes become expanded and irregular, so do the interspaces between them become constricted and well defined, until at last the tubes and interspaces appear to have changed places entirely, the tubes having become irregular interspaces, and the interspaces definite tubes. For this extraordinary condition I propose to use the term ‘‘ reversal of the canal system.” The pseudopores in the external skin of the colony now lead into narrow tubular inhalant canals, while the oscula on the top of the sponge communicate with the irregular spaces between these inhalant canals. These irregular spaces really represent the Ascon-tubes, and are lined on the inside of their walls by collared cells, while the narrow inhalant canals, which resemble in 30 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. appearance the original Ascon-tubes, are lined on the owtszde of their walls by collared cells, so that a section across one of these inhalant canals looks like a section of an Ascon-tube turned inside out. The tubular oscula are also lined inside by collared cells. It is almost impossible to imagine a more complete loss of individuality on the part of the Ascon-persons which make up the colony than is exhibited in this sponge. It is difficult to convey in words a clear idea of the real state of the case, but I hope that reference to the figures will enable the reader to follow my description. Figure 1, Plate V., is a slightly diagrammatic view of a young colony cut in half vertically. Figure 2, Plate V., 1s a diagram, simplified as far as possible, and intended merely to show how the well-defined Ascon-tubes of the lower part of the colony become transformed into irregular interspaces in the upper portion, and vice versd. The layer of collared cells is, as usual, coloured red. As already stated, this diagram is very much simplified; thus all the tubes are made vertical instead of branching and ramifying in every direction, and no inhalant canals are represented as entering from the sides of the colony as they mostly do in nature. As, in the upward growth of the colony, the true Ascon-tubes gradually become transformed into irregular interspaces, and the true interspaces become gradually converted into definite tubes, a transition stage is reached at a certain point in which there are no definite tubes at all, and both Ascon-tubes and interspaces are represented by a series of irregular cavities. This condition usually prevails over a considerable portion of the centre of the colony (the portion marked x in Fig. 2, Pl. Y.), so that here we have instead of tubes and interspaces two systems of irreeular cavities. All the cavities of each system communicate freely with one another, but the one system never communicates with the other except through the minute inhalant pores (prosopyles) in the tube walls, which latter now form a very complex and irregular series of undulating membranes dividing the two systems of cavities. It is still possible to determine whether a given cavity in the sponge is gastral cavity or interspace by examining carefully its bounding membrane, and observing on which side the collared cells le.* The undulating membrane (= Ascon-tube walls fused together) exhibits the usual characteristics of the Ascon-tube wall except for the presence in it of the yellow granules described above (p. 18). The mesoderm is, however, well developed, so that the wall averages about 0-035 mm. in thickness. I have not succeeded in detecting the prosopyles, apparently they are all closed. Type D.—This type of canal system is exemplified in Leucosolenia ventricosa. In this species the colony forms large, compact, irregular masses, with uneven, undulating outer surface rising into mounds and ridges. In the typical * As the collared cells very readily become detached and float away in spirit specimens, the task is rendered still more difficult, unless the material is very well preserved. If the collared cells have gone we can still tell on which side they lay by the position of other structures in the wall, as, for example, the position of the spicules and yellow granules. In well-preserved specimens, however, collared cells can easily be found. j A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 31 forms there is in the centre of the colony a wide space or hollow in the form of a tube, penetrating almost to the base of the colony and opening above by a wide pseudosculum surrounded by a membranous frill or collar. This cavity is the pseudogaster. Its irregularity in form, the fact that it often shows subsidiary openings through the wall of the colony iv addition to the terminal pseudosculum, and, above all, the fact that it is not lined by collared cells, all point to the conclusion that it is not a true gastral cavity but really les outside the colony and is formed by the latter erowine up in the form of a thick wall around a central space. Figure 8, Plate I, shows a very small specimen drawn three times the natural size. Figure 9, Plate I. shows the external appearance of a larger specimen, and Figure 10, Plate I. shows the same specimen cut in half longitudinally so as to exhibit the pseudogaster. The colony (7.e. the thick wall of the pseudogaster) is made up of a dense plexus of branching and anastomosing Ascon-tubes separated from one another by well-developed interspaces and opening by true oscula into the pseudogaster, All over the outer surface of the colony are numerous pseudopores, leading into the interspaces between the Ascon-tubes. They are small rounded or oval openings, ranging in diameter from about 0.3 to nearly 1 mm., and they are separated from one another by intervals of about the same breadth as themselves. The investing skin or pseudoderm of the colony is in this species remarkably well developed and it is clearly differentiated into two parts. (1) The part covering the outside of the sponge and perforated by the pseudopores, and (2) The part linmg the pseudogaster, not perforated (as a rule at any rate) by any pseudopores but by numerous true oscula, arranged in groups, as shown in Fieure 10, Plate I. Now the first of these two parts consists of a great number of Ascon-tubes fused together side by side so as to leave small but frequent interspaces, the pseudopores. These outer Ascon-tubes are much smaller than those in the interior of the colony, but their outer walls are very thick and strengthened by very large spicules. Hence the skin on the outer surface of the sponge is a thick double membrane in which the sastral cavities of its component Ascon-tubes are still present as small spaces lined by collared cells (Pl. IV., Fig. 4). The portion of the pseudoderm which lines the pseudogaster constitutes, on the other hand, a very distinct and easily separable membrane, about 0-1 mim. in thickness, perforated by the exhalant openings of the Ascon-tubes (true oscula). This membrane, however, instead of showing a number of spaces lined by collared cells in the thickness between its two surfaces, is solid, consisting of the usual gelatinous mesodermal eround-substance with cells and spicules embedded in it, and lined on each side by 32 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. ectoderm. The walls of the fused Ascon-tubes of which it is probably, like the outer portion of the pseudoderm, composed, have grown together and obliterated the gastral cavities, and the collared cells have disappeared. ‘The openings of the Ascon-tubes (v.e., oscula) appear to be formed secondarily; an Ascon-tube approaches the inner side of the membrane and the wall of the tube fuses with it. Then a perforation is established through the fused portion, leading from the gastral cavity of the Ascon-tube into the pseudogaster. Around the pseudosculum the lining membrane of the pseudogaster is continued into a frill or collar (Pl. I., Fig. 10). This is the only way in which I can explain the formation of the lining membrane of the pseudogaster, which differs essentially from the wall of an Ascon- tube in that it is not lined on either surface by collared cells, but on both by an epithelium of ordinary plate-like cells. We find an analogous process going on in the stalks of stipitate Calcisponges, which, originally formed out of one or more Ascon- tubes (or flagellated chambers in the higher forms), become solid by the obliteration of the cavities of the tubes and the disappearance of the collared cells.* We come now to speak of the structure of the Ascon-tubes themselves. These, as already stated, are much narrower on the outside of the colony than elsewhere, and their outer walls are very thick (0.14 mm.) and contain numbers of very large spicules, so as to form a hard, resistent skin over the whole outer surface, penetrated by the pseudopores. As the Ascon-tubes approach the pseudogaster, towards which, notwithstanding their complex branching and anastomosing, the course of all the principal tubes is directed, their diameter increases and their walls become much thinner, so that while the Ascon-tubes themselves may have a diameter of 0.5 mm., their walls measure only about 0.05 mm. in thickness. Still these walls are very strong and firm, for they are supported by a very well developed skeleton of good-sized spicules, though much smaller than those on the outer surface. The inhalant pores (prosopyles) in the walls of the Ascon-tubes are clearly visible in my preparations. ‘They are simply circular apertures about 0-085 mm. in diameter. The interspaces between the Ascon-tubes are wide and irregular, and continue right up to the lining membrane of the pseudogaster without diminishing in size. They communicate with the exterior through the small pseudopores on the outer surface of the colony. Type E.—This very remarkable type of canal system, in which is shown the * Compare my account of the development of the stalk in Grantia labyrinthica. (Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges III. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, January, 1891.) 2 v co A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES, first indication of the subdivision of the gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes by mesodermal inegrowths, is exemplified in Leucosolemia proxima. The external appearance of this sponge is represented in Figures 1 and 2, Plate II. The colonies are small, only about 7 or 8 mm. in diameter, and attached to foreign objects, such as the stems of Algz, by means of root-like processes. Over the upper surface of the colony are numerous small true oscula, each raised on a conical projection. The surface of the colony is pitted by numerous pseudopores. Except for the ingrowth of the mesoderm into the gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes the canal system agrees with type B, as will be seen at once by reference to Ficure 1, Plate VIII., representing a vertical section through the colony. The pseudopores on the outer surface of the colony are oval and measure about 0:27 mm. in longer diameter (in the specimen selected). They lead into perfectly irregular inter- spaces between the Ascon-tubes. The Ascon-tubes have thin walls measuring about 0°028 mm. in thickness. The inhalant pores (prosopyles) which perforate the tube-walls are, as usual, small circular apertures, easily visible in my preparations as areas devoid of collared cells and about 0-014 mm. in diameter; they may very likely be larger when fully opened. The Ascon-tubes of which the colony is composed collect together into several larger tubes, each of which leads up to and opens through an osculum. In many of the Ascon-tubes, and especially in the larger branches which lead up to the oscula, there is plainly visible a network (Pi. VIII., Figs. 1, 2) of large, nucleated, stellate cells, sometimes appearing only near the wall of the tube, leaving the central portion of the gastral cavity quite empty, but at others stretching right across from wall to wall in the section. These stellate cells resemble ordinary mesodermal connective tissue cells except in their large size. The network which they form inside the gastral cavity remains connected with the mesoderm in the tube-wall by means of certain of the long slender processes of the cells, which penetrate between the collared cells of the endoderm. It appears to me highly probable that this network of cells has a nutritive function and serves to entangle food particles floating in the stream of water which flows through the tubes. There is no trace of a similar network in the interspaces between the Ascon-tubes. It seems very strange that the mesoderm should thus break through the endoderm and come to lie on both sides of it. A somewhat analogous occurrence takes place in the case of the ovum of Grantia labyrinthica, which, as I have elsewhere* shown, breaks through the ectoderm and hangs suspended in the inhalant canals awaiting fertilisation;} but this is only a temporary condition and more easily understood, for the ovum at an early stage is known to possess the power of amoeboid movement. * « Studies on the Comparative Anatomy of Sponges, III. On the Anatomy of Grantia labyrinthica, Carter, and the so-called family Teichonidm.”’ Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, January, 1891. { A careful re-examination of my preparations of Grantia labyrinthica, since this was written, has made me doubt the correctness of this observation, it being difficult to determine the true nature of the cavities in which the ova are suspended, 34 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. Type F.—This, the last type of reticulate canal system, is obviously a further development of type E, and hence especially interesting. It is best exemplified in Leucosolenia wilsont. The canal system exactly resembles that of Leucosolenia proxima except that the mesodermal ingrowths into the gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes are more strongly developed and the collared cells have spread in over them, so that the mesoderm is again covered all over by a layer of endoderm. ‘The result of this proceeding is to divide the Ascon-tubes into a series of irregular and incomplete chambers, by means of what Heckel terms ‘ endogastric septa.” The entire sponge forms a low, irregular, encrusting growth (Pl. II., Figs. 3, 4) attached to the substratum by short, root-like processes. On the upper surface are the minute oscula, each on the summit of a small and almost solid, conical projection, and also numerous pseudopores which (on the upper surface of the sponge) are elongated and slit-like. Owing to the partial blocking up of the Ascon-tubes by the endogastric septa the whole sponge acquires an unusual degree of solidity, which is a very characteristic feature of the species. The pseudopores lead direct into the irregular and perfectly empty interspaces, about which there is nothing to attract attention. ‘These lead through the inhalant pores (prosopyles), which are easily visible in some parts of my preparations and measure about 0.02 mm. in diameter, into the Ascon-tubes. The Ascon-tubes, after collecting several together, open through the minute oscula at the apices of the conical projections (Pl. VII., Fig. 1). The appearance of the Ascon-tubes in section varies a good deal in different parts of the same colony and would seem to depend upon their age. In parts of the colony which seem to have been newly formed they are comparatively thin-walled, the wall of the tube being only about 0.04 mm. in thickness, while the inhalant pores (prosopyles) are clearly visible. The mesodermal ingrowths, also, are not nearly so strongly developed as in older tubes, consisting simply of a loose network of stellate cells, over which, however, the collared cells have already spread themselves. In the older parts of the colony the walls of the Ascon-tubes are thicker, the mesodermal ingrowths are more solid and the network of stellate ceils of which they are at first composed is hardly visible through the dense layer of collared cells which invests it. This condition is represented in Figures 2 and 8, Plate VII. In the thick walls of the Ascon-tubes small stellate cells can be seen imbedded in the gelatinous ground- substance. The prosopyles are not visible in my sections of the older parts of the colony, being apparently closed. No spicules are developed in the mesodermal ingrowths in the gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes, so that if any doubt existed as to the position and extent of the originally simple and perfectly hollow Ascon-tubes the arrangement of the skeleton would be sufficient at once to determine it. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 85 In many of the older tubes developing embryos* were found suspended in the middle of the gastral cavity, embedded in the mesoderm and surrounded by a peculiar capsule ; but these have already been described. A similar, if not identical, condition of the Ascon-tubes, characterised by the formation of endogastric septa, was long since described by Heckel in his Ascetta primordialis var. loculosa and A. clathrus vay. clathrina.+ Srotion II]. raprara. This section of the genus, as its name implies, includes such species as exhibit a radiate structure—the sponge consisting of a single central Ascon-tube from which smaller tubes are budded off radially. The only example of the section with which I am as yet acquainted is Leucosolema tripodifera, a very interesting sponge originally described by Mr. Carter under the name Clathrina tripodifera. Fortunately, a considerable number of specimens of this sponge have come into my hands, including a piece of one of Mr. Carter’s type specimens in the British Museum, so that I have been able fully to elucidate the anatomy of the species, an undertaking greatly facilitated by the large size to which the sponge grows. One specimen in my possession is nearly four inches (100 mm.) in height, and two inches (50 mm.) in diameter, it is represented of the natural size in Figure 6, Plate II. The remainder of my specimens, however, are none of them more than about one inch and a half (88 mm.) high, and three quarters of an inch (19 mm.) in diameter (Pl. IL., Fig. 5). The whole sponge resembles a very thick walled sack, ‘The cavity of the sack is the gastral cavity of the central Ascon-tube, which is extraordinarily large, its transverse diameter being as great as, or greater than, the thickness of the wall of the sack. This cavity terminates in a wide osculum at the summit of the sponge (PI. V., Fig. 3). The thick wall of the sack is made up of a great number of radial tubes given off from the central tube, into which they open by means of irregular groups of openings (Pl. V., Fig. 3). The way in which these radial tubes are formed is very plamly shown in one of my specimens, represented in a slightly diagrammatic manner in Figure 3, Plate V. At the summit of the sponge, immediately below the osculum, the wall of the large central Ascon-tube is very thin and membranous and there are no radial tubes developed as yet, so that it looks as if the osculum were surrounded by a membranous oscular frmge. ‘The * In the closely-allied species Leucosolenia depressa, ova only were found, in the same position as the embryos in L. wilsoni. {| “ Die Kalkschwiimme,”’ Vol. 2, pp. 23, 85. Vol. 3, Pl. IV., Vig. 5. 36 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. uppermost part of the sponge, in fact, is still in the condition of a simple Ascon- person, with an unusually wide gastral cavity, whose thin walls (about 0-025 mm. thick) exhibit the usual structure, being lined by a layer of collared cells on the inside, and perforated by numerous inhalant pores (prosopyles). At a short distance below the osculum, however, small, hollow buds make their appearance as outgrowths of the thin tube-wall. These buds are at first simple and unbranched. As they grow older they elongate and branch freely towards their distal ends, which terminate blindly; this condition prevails lower down in the colony. The branches of these numerous radial tubes he close to one another, frequently touching, and form all together the thick wall of the sponge, which, of course, oradually increases in thickness as the colony grows older and is hence much thicker in the lower than in the upper portion of the sponge. Occasionally the cavities of the radial tubes communicate directly one with another but this does not seem to be at all general ; an instance is shown in Figure 4, Plate V. As they branch towards their distal extremities the radial tubes become gradually narrower (PI. V., Fig. 4) and their blind ends, for the most part in contact with one another, and protected by special spicules, form the outer surface of the sponge. Abundant small interstices are left between the ends of the radial tubes, which serve for the admission of water into the irregular interspaces between the radial tubes. The structure of the individual radial tubes is shown in Figure 4, Plate V., and conforms to the usual Ascon type. The inhalant pores (prosopyles) are very distinctly shown in my preparations, they are simply circular apertures about 0.014 mm. in diameter. The interspaces between the radial tubes are wide and irregular, widening as they approach the wall of the central Ascon-tube. By cutting off portions of the wall of the central Ascon-tube and staining them separately, as well as by means of sections, I have been able to prove beyond doubt that the central cavity of the sponge is really lined by collared cells; its wall in fact presents the same structure as those of the radial tubes and is, like the latter, perforated by inhalant pores (prosopyles). According to Mr. Carter this species is sometimes lipostomous, or devoid of osculum. He says,* describing the general form of the sponge, “ conical, rather compressed, sessile, fixed, with cloaca and wide mouth; or ovoid and free, with cloacal cavity but o mouth, that is Heckel’s ‘Auloplegma’-form.” If Mr. Carter’s account be correct it is a very remarkable thing, and I cannot at all understand how the stream of water is kept up through the sponge when there is no osculum. *Annals and Magazine of Natural History, June, 1886, p. 505. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 37 Certainly if the sponge is to continue to exist there must be some exhalant opening ; moreover, if there be no osculum, why should there be a “cloacal cavity,’ as Mr. Carter calls it? I can understand the sponge having been perhaps damaged, and its growth consequently disturbed, and the osculum perhaps concealed by overgrowth of the neighbouring parts, but I cannot believe that there exists a sponge with no exhalant opening (vide infra). Abnormalities in the form of the sponge may certainly occur, for in-one of my specimens a kind of secondary osculum, if one may use the term, has been established near the base of the sponge, the radial tubes being absent over a small area and the thin wall of the central Ascon-tube perforated by a relatively large opening. Whether this is the result of injury or not it is impossible to say, but it seems not unlikely. D.—Tse Cana SyYsteM oF THE CaLCAREA Homoca@LA IN GENERAL. After what has been said in the previous section there remains but little to add concerning the canal system of the Homoccela. The Victorian species of Leucosolenia so completely represent the genus that a knowledge of their anatomy is nearly all that is required to understand the anatomy of the Homoccla in general. The different forms of canal system enumerated and described above include with a few doubtful exceptions all the known types, and even add to those already described. The most important exceptions to this statement are what are known as the lipostomous forms, 7.e., forms without any osculum, including Heckel’s “ artificial genera,” Clistolynthus and Auloplegma, the former being a simple Olynthus with no osculum, and the latter a reticulate colony with no osculum. According to Heckel the osculum may be entirely wanting, and then part of the prosopyles (Tubi porales, Heckel) serve for the admission of water and part for its expulsion from the gastral cavity. Itis a significant fact that amongst the numerous forms of Homoccla which I have had the opportunity of examining, I have never met with an example of what can be considered as true lipostomy. Certainly, as I have pointed out previously (in the case of Leucosolenta lucasi and L. stolonifer) the young Ascon-persons, formed as buds from the parent tube, at first end blindly and acquire an osculum only when they reach a certain age; but this is only an immature condition, and it seems to me not impossible that Heeckel’s Clistolynthus may simply be an immature form in which the osculum is not yet developed. As to the Auloplegma form, I cannot help regarding this as simply a reticulate colony in which the oscula, opening cither into a pseudogaster or directly on the surface of the colony, have been overlooked owing to their small size. In those forms provided with a pseudogaster which L have examined (e.g., Leucosolenia ventricosa) I have always been able to find direct 38 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. communication between the gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes and the pseudogaster. Then again we must not forget that in many sponges the osculum has the power of closing up entirely, and many forms described as lipostomous are probably only forms in which the osculum is temporarily closed, possibly by the action of the spirit in which the specimen has been preserved. I am unwilling to admit without further evidence that species exist in which the prosopyles serve both as incurrent and excurrent openings, there being no special excurrent opening or openings present in the adult sponge. Even, however, if we admit the existence of truly lipostomous Homocela, there is no reason to alter or add to the classification of the canal system proposed above, for the lipostomous forms might stand side by side in the various groups with the ordinary osculate types. Of the fifteen ‘artificial genera” described by Heckel and diagnosed in the next section of the present memoir, the first seven, Olynthus, Olynthella, Olynthium, Clistolynthus, Soleniscus, Solenula and Solenidium fall under my section Homocela simplicia ; Nardorus, Nardopsis, Nardoma, Tarrus, Tarropsis and Tarroma are reticulate forms, while the last genus Ascometra is, according to Heckel, a compound of several of the preceding genera in a single colony, but I prefer to regard it as a colony composed of individuals in various stages of development. Concerning the types of canal system represented by von Lendenfeld’s genera Homoderma and Leucopsis* there is little to say; Homoderma, if it really be a Homoccelous sponge, comes under my section Radiata, while Leucopsis is too imperfectly described to be taken into serious consideration, though as far as we can judge from the description and figure it appears to be simply a reticulate Leucosolenia with well developed pseudogaster. As to Heckel’s Ascaltis canariensis and Ascaltis lamarckit, which von Lendenfeld nowt includes in his family Homodermide, I cannot see any reason for placing them amongst the radiate Homocela. The endodermal papilla which project into the gastral cavity around the apical rays of the quadriradiates appear, to judge from Heeckel’s description and figures,} to be merely exaggerations of the slight projections of the endoderm which frequently surround the bases of projecting spicule-rays (cf. Leucosolenia stolonifer, Pl. VI., Fig. 1) and they certainly in no way indicate the formation of radial tubes, which originate as outgrowths and not as ingrowths. A moment's reflection will show that such ingrowths of the endoderm as those figured by Heckel could never give rise to the formation of radial tubes. * Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales. Vol. IX., Part 4, pp. 1088, 1089. Tt ‘Das System der Spongien.” (Separatabdruck aus den Abh ; gi Gegelisshatty Peete tea (Sep us den andlungen der Senckenbergischen naturforschenden } “Die Kalkschwimme,” Vol. 2, pp. 52, 60. Vol. 3, Plate IX, Figs. 1, 2, 3, 5. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 39 UI.—THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE CALCAREA HOMOCCLA. In classifying the Calcarea we have two primary sets of characters to guide us ; these are (1) the structure of the imdividual (person) and (2) the structure of the sponge-colony as a whole. Heckel apparently considers the structure of the individual to be the most umportant. In his great monograph of the group, he distinguishes three ‘ families” of calcareous sponges :— 1. Ascones,* = Calcisponges ‘‘ mit Loch-Canalen.”’ 2. Leucones, = Calcisponges ‘‘ mit Ast-Candlen.” 3. Sycones, = Calcisponges ‘‘ mit Strahl-Candalen.” But here already we are landed in confusion, for the ‘‘ Loch-Canalen,”’ ‘“ Ast- Canalen,” and ‘Strahl-Canalen ” are not homologous or even comparable structures. The Loch-Canalen of the Ascones (Homoccela) are simply the inhalant pores (prosopyles) in the thin wall of the Ascon-person, while the “ Strahl-Canalen” of the Sycones are totally distinct structures, being really, according to Heckel, the homologues of entire Ascon-persons, and the Sycon-person as a whole equivalent to a colony of Ascon- persons formed by gemmation. Each “ Strahl-Canal” is, according to this view,t nothing but an Ascon-person, and each certainly has its own ‘ Loch-Canalen” exactly as ina typical Homoccelous (Ascon) form. If Heckel’s opinion that the Sycon-person is equivalent to a colony of Ascon- persons is correct, he really makes use of the form of the colony and not of the structure of the individual as the family characteristic of the Sycones. When, however, he comes to subdivide the Ascones (—= Homoccela) into genera he denies the value of the form of the colony as a whole as a natural character, relying entirely for the distinction of what he terms his ‘natural’? genera upon the structure of the skeleton, and using the form of the colony only in what he terms his “artificial” system. Accordingly we find two schemes of classification in Heckel’s monograph placed side by side, the artificial and natural, as he calls them. We will consider at present * Heeckel’s Ascones are equivalent to our Homocala, his Leucones and Sycones to the Heterocala. | Ido not wish to commit myself at present to any definite view on this question, which will be discussed in a later portion of the present work. 40 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. only that part of each system which deals with the Calcarea Homoccela (Ascones), of which the following is an epitome* :— Genus Genus Genus Genus Genus Genus Genus Genus Genus Genus Genus Genus Genus Genus (a.) NaTURAL SYSTEM. Family Ascones. Ascetta.—Spicules all triradiate. Ascilla.—Spicules all quadriradiate. Ascyssa.—Spicules all oxeote. Ascaltis.—Spicules partly trivadiate, partly quadrivadiate. Ascortis—Spicules partly trivadiate, partly oxeote. Asculmis.—Spicules partly quadriradiate, partly oxeote. Ascandra.—Spicules partly trivadiate, partly quadriradiate and partly oxeote. (p.) ARTIFICIAL SYSTEM. Family 1. Olynthida. Ascones consisting of a single person with a single osculum. Olynthus.—A single person with naked osculum. Olynthella.—A single person with probosciform osculum. Olynthinm.—A single person with the osculum provided with a fringe. Family 2, Clystolinthida. Ascones consisting of a single person without any osculum. Clystolynthus.—A single person without an osculum. Family 8. Soleniscida. Ascones consisting of a colony of simple persons provided with oscula. Soleniscus.—A colony of simple persons with naked oscula. Solenula.—A colony of simple persons with probosciform oscula. Solenidium.—A colony of simple persons with fringed oscula. * “Die Kalkschwimme,” Vol. I., pp. 84, 85. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. Al Family 4. Nardopsida. Ascones forming a colony with a single common osculum. Genus 8. Nardorus.—A colony with a single naked osculum. Genus 9. Nardopsis.—A colony with a single probosciform osculum. Genus 10. Nardoma.—A colony with a single fringed osculum. Family 5. Tarromida. Ascones in which the sponge 1s composed of several colonies, each with a single osculum. Genus 11. Tarrus.—A colony composed of several Nardorus colonies. Genus 12. Tarropsis.—A colony composed of several Nardopsis colonies. Genus 18. Tarroma.—A colony composed of several Nardonia colonies. Family 6. Auloplegmida. Ascones consisting of a colony with no osculum. Genus 14. Auloplegnia.—A colony with no osculum. Family 7. Ascometrida. Ascones consisting of a colony in which several generic forms are united. ; Genus 15. Ascometra.—A colony consisting of several generic forms united. The second of these two extremely ingenious schemes of classification is well termed by its author artificial, but this term, as it seems to me, applies equally well to the so-called “natural” system. Neither system is in itself sufficient, and the use of the two side by side by Heckel has led to an almost hopeless confusion in the nomenclature of genera and species, as every spongologist finds to his cost when endeavouring to identify a calcareous sponge. The fault of each system lies in the fact that it is based upon a single group of characters, and the imadequateness of the ‘natural system,’ which Heckel principally uses, is shown by the host of ‘ generic,” ‘ specific,’ and ‘* connective ” varieties which he has been obliged to create, The first species described in Heckel’s monograph is Ascetla primordialis and this embraces seyen generic varieties, four specific varities and three connective varieties, each with a different name. ‘The only ‘ Species-character ” given is a short description of the spicules, and no type of the species is described ; and so on for the other species. 49, A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. Allforms of Homoccela, no matter what their anatomical peculiarities, which happen to have spicules of the same shape, are brought by Heckel under a single “species.” Now there are only three fundamental forms of spicules in the entire group of calcareous sponges, viz., the trivadiate, quadriradiate and oxeote, and each of these may vary greatly in shape within a single specimen. Moreover some portions of a colony may contain say oxeote or quadriradiate spicules, while other portions taken from the same specimen may contain none. Heckel was well aware of this variation in the spiculation and hence his “‘ connective varieties,’ which often bring the same species under two or three distinct genera. I grant that there are certain forms of spicules which may be regarded as typical for each species, but the presence of similar spicules is not alone sufficient to justify us in including under one specific name forms which otherwise differ widely in organisation. Heckel’s natural genera are particularly artificial, and this might be expected when we see that the same series of generic diagnoses, depending solely upon the combinations of the three types of spicules, is made to serve for all his three families of calcareous sponges. Since neither of Heckel’s alternative systems will satisfy the requirements of the modern zoologist we must find a new method, and in this new method we must be content to follow the example of workers in other branches of zoology and give up all hope of finding a royal road to classification. In other words, we must make use of as many characters as possible and not of as few, and in this way—classifying by an assemblage of characters*—we may fairly hope to make satisfactory progress. At the same time we must not forget that Heckel’s classification of the Calcarea was the first serious attempt at anything of the kind; that he had an extremely difficult task to deal with, and that immense credit is due to him for the energy and perseverance with which he led the way in this department of biology. All schemes of classification are but tentative and each must give place to later modifications as our knowledge advances, for evolution plays as important a part in our study of organisms as 1t does in the history of the organisms themselves. Of course we shall find that different characters often contradict one another, forms which agree in spiculation may differ widely in canal-system, and vice-versa. So great is the variation in both these characters amongst the Calcarea Homoccela and so difficult is it to determine which is the most important that Poléjaeff has, in his work on the Calcarea of the ‘Challenger’ Expedition, abandoned all Heckel’s seyen natural genera of Homocela and fallen back upon the old genus Leucosolenia * “No doubt organic beings, like all other objects, can be classed in many ways, either artificially by single characters or more naturally by a number of characters.”—Darwin, “ Origin of Species,” Ed. VL., p. 364. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 43 of Bowerbank as the sole genus of the group. In this I agree with Poléjaeff, but at the same time, as a mere matter of convenience and not necessarily as indicating genetic relationship, I prefer to subdivide the genus into sections and subsections according to the nature of the canal system of the colony. I prefer to make use of the canal system for this purpose rather than the spiculation, for I have frequently found the spiculation varying greatly in different parts of the same colony but never so the canal system (except m cases where a later-formed portion of the colony shows an advance in organisation as compared with an earlier-formed portion, as, for example, in Lewcosolenia cavata; but this is simply a case of different ontogenetic stages being present simultaneously. May not a similar state of affairs have given rise to Miklucho-Macleay’s* and Heckel’s statements as to the co-existence of different types of canal system in the same colony, as in Heckel’s genus Ascometra ?). On the other hand I have excellent series of specimens of obviously the same species in which the canal system is remarkably constant (e.g., Leucosolenia cavata, L. tripodifera, L. pelliculata). Moreover the canal system offers a wider range of characters to choose from than do the combinations of spicules, of which seven only are possible. The classification which I therefore propose to make use of for the Calcarea Homoceela is as follows :— Order Homocela (Poléjaeff). Calcareous sponges in which the endoderm consists throughout of collared cells. Genus, Leucosolenia (Bowerbank). With the characters of the order. Section 1. Homocela Sinplicia. Homoccela in which the Ascon-persons either remain solitary and do not form colonies or they form simple colonies in which the component Ascon-persons may branch but never form complex anastomoses nor give off radial tubes, so that the individuality of the different members of the colony is easily recognisable. Section 2. Homocela Reticulata.t Homocoela in which the sponge-colony forms a more or less complex network of branching and anastomosing tubes, so that it is no longer possible to distinguish the individual Ascon-persons of which the colony is composed. * Jenaische Zeitschrift, Vol. 1V., 1868. { This section is practically synonymous with Gray’s genus Clathrina, used by Carter in his descriptions of the Victorian sponges (loc. cit.). 44 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. Subsection 1. IJndivisa. The gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes composing the colony retain their primitive hollow condition, there being no ingrowths of mesoderm or endoderm. Subsection 2. Subdivisa. The gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes are more or less completely subdivided into chambers by ingrowths of mesoderm or of both mesoderm and endoderm. Section 8. Homocela Radiata. Homocela in which the sponge consists of a single, central Ascon-tube from which secondary tubes are budded off radially. This classification will, so far as I am aware, serve to include all the known forms of Homoceela with the doubtful exceptions of Heeckel’s A scometra and von Lendenfeld’s Leucopsis,* concerning both of which we require further details. Ascometra may, as I have already suggested, simply represent a series of ontogenetic stages present at the same time, for there can be little doubt that the most complex adult forms pass through several stages, beginning with the Olynthus, in their life history ; while the extremely doubtful Leucopsis is probably only one of the Homocela reticulata, and whatever it is it is so insufficiently described that we cannot possibly recognise it. In distinguishing species all characters are of use, and a well-marked difference in any cne character is, in my opinion, a sufficient justification for a distinct specific name. ‘This, of course, necessitates a good many specific names, but it is better to have too many than too few, and so long as each form is properly described increase of species only adds to our knowledge, while the merging of many forms under one name makes hopeless confusion, for the author who does so seldom thinks it necessary to give an adequate description of each variety and it then becomes impossible to sort them out and to determine which is really the type of the species. The term species is, as I understand it, a purely arbitrary one, meaning simply an assemblage of individuals more or less resembling one another and presumably descended from a common parent, but whether a particular individual belongs to a particular species or not is a question which each observer must decide for himself. + * Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, Vol. IX., part 4, p. 1089. | ‘From these remarks it will be seen that I look at the term species as one arbitrarily given, for the sake of convenience, to a set of individuals closely resembling each other, and that it does not essentially differ from the term variety, which is given to less distinct and more fluctuating forms. The term variety, again, in comparison with mere individual differences, is also applied arbitrarily, for convenience’ sake.”—Darwin, ‘ Origin of Species,” Ed. VI., p. 42. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 45 IV.—DESCRIPTIONS OF THE VICTORIAN SPECIES OF CALCARKA HOMOCGLA. I follow Poléjaeff* in dividing the calcareous sponges into two orders, Homocela and Heterocela. The term Homoceela, as already stated, is synonymous with Heeckel’s term . Figure 7.—Leucosolenia cavata. Part of a large colony, seen from the side. (The specimen has been cut, and one of the cut surfaces is seen in perspective on the right.) From a photograph ; natural size. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 13 PLATE III. Figure 1,—Leucosolenia protogenes. Part of a large specimen; natural size. Figure 2.—Leucosolena pelliculata. A good-sized specimen; x 2. Figure 3.—Leucosolenia ventricosa, var. solida. Part of a large colony; natural size. Figure 4.—Leucosolenia depressa. Upper surface of the specimen; natural size. Figure 4a.—Leucosolenia depressa. Lower surface of the specimen; natural size. PLATE IV. Figure 1.—Leucosolenia lucasi. The upper portion of a single Ascon-person, highly magnified. At the summit of the tube is shown the wide osculum (o0.) and in the right hand upper portion of the figure a piece of the thin wall of the tube is supposed to be cut away so as to show the gastral cavity. The collared cells are coloured red and the spicules blue. a.v. Apical ray of quadriradiate spicule projecting into the gastral cavity. o. Osculum. ox. Oxeote spicule projecting from the outer surface of the tube wall. pr. Prosopyle. va, 'Trivadiate and quadriradiate spicules lying in the thickness of the mesoderm. Figure 2.—Leucosolenia stipitata. Vertical section, passing through the osculum, of the specimen represented in Figure 6, Plate I.; showing the arrangement of the canal system. For the sake of clearness the thickness of the walls of the Ascon-tubes is slightly exaggerated, ‘The endoderm is coloured red. (Zeiss ag, Oc. 2, Camera.) g.c. Gastral cavity. it. Interspace between Ascon-tubes. o. Osculum. fp. Pseudopore. fd. Pseudoderm. Figure 3.—Leucosolenia pulcherrima. Vertical section, passing through an osculum, of the specimen represented in Figure 7, Plate I.; showing the arrangement of the canal system. The endoderm is coloured red. (Zeiss ay, Oc. 2, Camera.) st. Stalk. Other lettering as in Figure 2. 74 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. Figure 4.—Leucosolenia ventricosa. Vertical section, passing through the pseudosculum, of the small specimen represented in Figure 8, Plate I.; showing the arrangement of the canal system. The endoderm is coloured red. (Zeiss a, Oc. 2, Camera.) o. Opening of Ascon-tube into pseudogaster (—osculum in Figures 2 and 8). pd! The portion of the pseudoderm which forms the lining membrane of the pseudogaster. p.g. Pseudogaster. p.o. Pseudosculum. Other lettering as in Figure 2. PLATE VY. Figure 1.—Leucosolenia cavata. A small colony cut in half vertically to show the arrangement of the canal system. Hnlarged and slightly diagrammatic. In the lower portion of the figure are seen the narrow Ascon-tubes separated by wide inter- spaces: in the upper portion are seen the narrow, tubular, inhalant canals (—inter- spaces of the lower portion) separated by wide, irregular cavities (=merged gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes) out of which the oscula open. a.t. Ascon-tubes in their primitive condition, forming the lower- most portion of the colony. Gastral cavities of the Ascon-tubes merged into irregular spaces. int. Interspaces between Ascon-tubes. it! Interspaces transformed into narrow inhalant canals. o. Osculum. f. Pseudopore leading into wide irregular interspace. p. — Pseudopore leading into narrow, tubular interspace. pd. Pseudoderm. Figure 2.—Leucosolenia cavata. Simplified diagram, based upon Figure 1, to illustrate the reversal of the canal system. The endoderm is coloured red and the space occupied by the merged gastral cavities is coloured black (except where the endodermal lining is seen en face). For the sake of clearness all the tubes are represented as unbranched and running vertically instead of in every direction as A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 75 they really do (cf. Figure 1). The transition between the normal and the reversed portions of the canal system takes place in the area marked x, where it will be seen that there are really no tubes at all but two systems of spaces separated by an undulating membrane. Lettering as in Figure 1. Figure 3.—Leucosolenia tripodifera. A small specimen the upper portion of which has been divided longitudinally so as to exhibit the arrangement of the canal system. The red colour indicates the distribution of the collared cells, which are visible wherever the central cavity or the radial tubes have been cut into. The figure also shows how the radial tubes originate as little hollow diverticula (r't') of the wall of the central cavity a short way below the osculum, at first unbranched but as they grow older (r.t.) branching freely. g.c. Gastral cavity. int. Interspaces between radial tubes, o. Osculum. op. Openings of radial tubes into gastral cavity. y.t. Nadial tubes. rt’. Young radial tubes. Figure 4.—Leucosolenia tripodifera. Small portion of a thin section along the radial tubes seen under a low power of the microscope. In the upper right-hand part of the section the tubes are not cut into and their walls are seen en face. Hilsewhere the tubes are cut right through so as to show their walls only in section. The endoderm is coloured red and the spicules blue. a. Anastomosis between two neighbourig radial tubes. pr. Prosopyle. i.s. Large “tripod” spicules protecting the blind outer ends of the radial tubes. Other letterig as in Figure 3. PLATE VI. Figure 1.—Leucosolenia stolonifer. Small portion of a transverse section of the wall of an Ascon-person. ‘The endoderm is coloured red and the spicules blue. (Zeiss C, Oc. 2.) 76 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. ap.v. Apical ray of quadviradiate spicule, projecting into the gastral cavity. ect. EKctoderm. end. Kndoderm. i.c. Inhalant canal. mes. Mesoderm. pr. Prosopyle. st. c. Stellate cell of mesoderm. Figure 2.—Leucosolenia stolonifer. The projecting apical ray of a quadriradiate spicule, enclosed in its cellular sheath. (Zeiss I’, Oc. 2.) ap. v. Apical ray. c.c. Collared cells around the base of the spicule ray. sp. s. Sheath of flattened endothelial cells around the spicule ray. Figure 3.—Leucosolenia stolonifer. A multipolar connective tissue cell of the mesoderm (Zeiss. F', Oc. 2). Figure 4.—Leucosolenia cavata. Vertical section of tube-wall (Zeiss F, Oc. 2). c.c. Collared cells. ect. Nucleus of ectoderm cell. mes. Mesodermal ground-substance. ov. Ovuin, surrounded by other mesodermal cells. sp. Spicule. st. c. Stellate cell of mesoderm. y. gr. Group of yellow granules. Figure 5.—Leucosolema cavata. Portion of tube-wall laid out flat and examined as a transparent object; the entire thickness is supposed to be in focus. (Zeiss F, Ocr2s) y. §”. 1. Young (solid) group of yellow granules. y. §7. 2, Fully developed group of yellow granules with central space. Other lettering as in Figure 4. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. TCE PLATE VII. Anatomy and histology of Leucosolema wilson. (Red=endoderm; blue= spicules). Figure 1.—Part of a vertical transverse section of the specimen represented in Figure 3, Plate II.; showing the arrangement of the canal system. (Zeiss ay, Oc. 2, Camera.) em. HKmbryo. g.c. Gastral cavities of Ascon-tubes, more or less subdivided by endogastric septa. mt. Interspaces between Ascon-tubes. o. Osculum. fp. Pseudopore. fd. Pseudoderm. r. Root-like process which attaches the sponge to the substratum. Figure 2,—Part of a section of a single Ascon-tube more highly magnified (Zeiss C, Oc. 2, Camera); showing the subdivision of the gastral cavity by endogastric septa. The collared cells appear to form several layers in some places, but this is probably due chiefly, if not entirely, to the irregularity of the surface which the endoderm covers causing the latter to be often cut tangentially. ect. Jctoderm. e. Ss. Hndogastric septum. g.c. Gastral cavity. st. c. Stellate cells in mesoderm. Figure 3.—Section similar to that represented in Figure 2, but with the endo- gastric septa more developed and containing embryos lying in special cavities lined by large endothelial cells. (Zeiss C, Oc. 2, Camera.) em. Himbryo. n.c. Nutriant endothelial cells forming the embryo-capsule. n.c. An embryo capsule cut tangentially so as to show the polygonal form of the endothelial cells. Other lettering as in Figure 2. Figure 4. Ketodermal epithelium seen in a tangential section of an Ascon-tube. (Zeiss I’, Oc. 2, Camera.) 78 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. Figure 5.—Small portion of a thin section of an Ascon-tube, showing how the collared cells spread in from the wall of the tube over the mesodermal ingrowths, thus forming with the latter the endogastric septa. (Zeiss F, Oc. 2.) c.c. Collared ceils. mes. Mesoderm of the tube-wall. mes’. Inerowth of mesoderm into the gastral cavity. PLATE YIII. Figure 1.—Leucosolema proxima. Vertical section of the specimen represented in Figure 1, Plate H.; showing the arrangement of the canal system. The endoderm is coloured red. (Zeiss a,, Oc. 2, Camera.) g.c. Gastral cavity of Ascon-tube. int. Interspace between Ascon-tubes. 0. Osculum. p. Pseudopore. pd. Pseudoderm. iP Root-like attaching process. st. c. Stellate mesoderm cells forming a network in the gastral cavity. Figure 2.—Leucosolenia proxima. A small portion of a section more highly magnified (Zeiss F', Oc. 2); showing part of the wall of an Ascon-tube and part of the network of stellate mesodermal cells in the gastral cavity. c.c. Collared cells (collars and flagella completely retracted). ect. HKetoderm. mes. Mesodermal ground-substance. nu. Nucleus of stellate cell. sp. Spicule. st. c. Network of stellate cells in the gastral cavity. Figures 3, 4.—Leucosolenia proxima. Group of three collared cells and isolated collared cell. The collars are still extended but the flagella are withdrawn. (Zeiss F, Oc. 4.) col. Collar. nu. Nucleus. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 79 Figure 5.—Leucosolenia tripodifera.. Small portion of a section of the tube- wall, showing the arrangement of the collared cells and Sollas’s membrane, with the rod-like bodies. ° c.c. Collared eells. v. b. Rod-like bodies. s. m. Sollas’s membrane. Figure 6.—Leucosolenia tripodifera. Portion of a section similar to that repre- sented in Figure 5, but more highly magnified. col. Collar of collared cell. Other lettering as in Figure 5. . Figure 7.—Leucosolenia pellieulata. Section of an ovum (Zeiss F’, Oc. 2). gr. b. Granular body of the ovum. no. Nucleolus. nu. Nucleus. Figure 8.—ZLeucosolenia depressa. Section of an ovum (Zeiss F, Oc. 2). The outline of the section is indicated by a dotted line, the granular body of the ovum being filled in only at one place. gr. Granules lying just within the nuclear membrane. n.m. Nuclear membrane. n.n. Nuclear network. Other lettering as in Figure 7. PLATE IX. Spicules. Fieure 1.—Leucosolenia lucasi. a. ‘'Triradiate. b. Quadriradiates; facial view, the apical ray represented as seen in optical section at its base. b.' Quadriradiate; side view, showing the apical ray (a. 7.) in full length, the three facial rays being broken off short. c. Oxeotes. Figure 2.—Leucosolenia stolonifer. b. Quadriradiates; facial view, the apical ray represented as seen in optical section at its base. 6.’ Quadriradiates; side view, showing normal apical ray (a. .) in full length. b.” Quadriradiates; side view, showing immensely hypertrophied apical ray (a. 7.) in full length. c. Oxeotes. 80 A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. Figure 8.—Leucosolenia dubia. a. ‘Triradiates. a.' Strongly sagittal triradiate (abnormal). b. Quadriradiate; facial view, the apical ray represented as seen in optical section at its base. c. Oxeotes. Fieure 4.—Leucosolenia cavata. a. ‘'Triradiates. b. Quadriradiate; facial view, the apical ray represented as seen in optical section at its base. c. Oxeotes. Figure 5.—Leucosolenia stipitata. Triradiates from the body of the sponge. Nore.—The figures are all drawn to the same scale, with Zeiss’s camera lucida, and multiplied by about 260 diameters. After the drawings were completed it was found that the camera employed caused a certain amount of distortion; this, however, only affects the largest spicules to any perceptible degree, causing some of the rays to be unduly elongated. As full descriptions and measure- ments of the spicules are given in the text it is hoped that the error thus introduced will not cause any serious inconvenience. PLATE X. Spicules. Figure 1.— Leucosolenia pelliculata (Specimen A). a. ‘Triradiates. a.' Sagittal oscular triradiate. Quadriradiates; facial view, the apical ray represented as seen in optical section at its base. b.' Quadriradiate; side view, showing the full leneth of the apical ray (a. 7.), the facial rays being broken off short. 6." Sagittal oscular quadriradiate; facial view, the apical ray represented as seen in optical section at its base. Figure 2.—Leucosolenia pelliculata. (Specimen D.) Lettering as in Figure 1. A MONOGRAPH OF THE VICTORIAN SPONGES. 51 Figure 3.—Leucosolenia pulcherruna. a. Ordinary deep-lying triradiates. a.’ Stout, curved dermal triradiates. Fieure 4.—Leucosolenia ventricosa. a. ‘Triradiates of various sizes. b. (uadriradiates; facial view, the apical ray represented as seen in optical section at its base. c. Oxeote. Nore. —The note after the description of Plate IX. applies equally to this plate. PLATE XI. Spicules. Figure 1.—Leucosolenia protogenes. Trivadiates of different sizes. Figure 2.—Leucosolenia proxima. Triradiates of different sizes. Fieure 3.—Leucosolema wilson. Trivadiates of different sizes. Fieure 4.—Leucosolenia depressa. a. ‘Triradiates. b. Quadriradiates; facial view, the apical ray represented a op. seen in optical section at its base. Figure 5.—Leucosolenia tripodifera. a. ‘T'riradiates. t a.' Dermal trivadiate (tripod spicule), side view. b. Quadriradiates; facial view, the apical ray represented as seen in optical section at its base. b.' Quadriradiate; side view, showing the apical ray (a. 7.) at full leneth; one of the facial rays is broken off and one represented as seen in optical section at its base. b." Quadrivadiate; facial view, showing the whole of the much curved apical ray (a. /.). Norn.—The note after the description of Plate IX. applies equally to this plate. Trens LS. Victoria Vol3 Flere/ ii Sag e4 am DA Tr 2 wee oa f drthur Dendy de (I. Leucosolenia lucasi2L.stolonifer 3L.dubia, 45,6,Lstipitata 7Lpulcherrima, 89,10, L. ventricosa) A hur Dendy del, e€ proto (l2,Leucosolenia proxima, 3,3, 4, Lwilsoni, 9, 6,L. tripodifera, Z L. cavata-) RC: 2 ln, a : ty = * =<. ote F ~. , oe Be -_ i ‘ a aT I=) CY Trans B.S Victor, DIST Wid ad nat.del, ed. tidh 7 (| Leucosolenia protogenes, 2 L pelliculata3.L ventricosa, var solida,4.4.a. |. depressa) --—— ANATOMY Fig | Leucosolenia lucasi, 2.L.stipitata, 3.L.pulcherrima, 4.L ventricoss | NT LL <—<<— @ y as vee as AYY ary Cpa ad eS A AX I> 2 456 « ANATOMY Art} > De, Ly del . 5 . iil alae ima (1.2. Leucosolenia cavata, 3.4. L.tripodifera.)} , ee —— eo A i | Vy rt \) S } ma] KN) > 2) ) } ~ \ , | ; \C) 2) =< — 2 * : = i 3 a> ae 5 _—- esse a \ * er ~ = Kini © 2 S ee re = K™ ~ ie =o * | l j 4 wy oe - y =H 8 r & SS ‘ = S S @ See 8 2 e sees. Huse s ©, OS a Es a —_ — _ i} — a am ANATOMY & HISTOLOGY (1.2.3 Leucoso r) , JERAY LE: Ath / 45 | cavata.,) enia stolonifer , ¥ ‘ @. . 1 a ‘ ‘ ‘ itt ‘ . « . é . ’ ‘ 4 ‘ aan . 4 7 . } ' ¥ t \ . at’ i ‘ ' ‘’ , } a ANATOMY & HISTOLOGY (Leucosolenia wilsoni| 2) 2 ©6088 6068668808 OGE O80 y a pre : fs TO} as @ tT) ee ¢¢® Ceeee® @ eee@ eee 2 . EZ 1 60806 x S Ody << 4 4 7 : yy ALCL? Lk nay Aéel ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY (123.4. Leucosolenia proxima 5.6.L.tripodifera 7L.pelliculata, 8..depresse i: 5D Sy N Arthur Denadly del Ao al (Oy Oe oS (| Leucosolenia lucasi,2 L.stolonifer 3 Ldubia, 4 Lcavata Trans. FUS. Victoria Vol3 Plate /O - SHICULES (12. Leucosolenia pelliculata,3 L. pulcherrima, 4, L ventricosa.) ts Ls, iss =o — as Ciara 4 it Md Fh aha. ek ‘ aA ba - . 7 > es 2 %) : f 3.L.wilsoni,4.Ldepressa, 5.L.tripodifera) » MITHS! SONIAN INSTITUTION LIBRARIES wii tn 3 9088 01308 8