PIBLD. DASGRA RALISTS a. 5) ©. a % € Ls Cl jo * PLD APP LL LLL IFIED % ransactions * Po. OX VOLUME II, No. 1. POPPI PS PL LIF IP LIFILLII III OTTAWA, EADARA. (OF rlizen Pr iniing and Publi shi se0r0g Company, Petealfe Ot. 188%. 41883. 1884. OTTAWA FrELD-NATURALISTS’ CLUB. TRANSACTIONS NO: 5. VOL ie NO. I. GOIN TaN aS: PaGe rset Officers: 1883284) Sa). fccscveie « cia) svorejalesssrasarerereieseres vad ASS ara Seislaing siserstee scr manele List of Standing WOMIMUtCESaa tee rat lat neta csie one arnt ee mae Se SAE 2 aTStOLe COTFESPONCINE MOCMPELSK.s se siecle cwiisiec.selevwiele sve clesaicijnsrceiwncls cine = Sayan slon an’ 2 PITH GLO LIVIN DOTS saree ceialers olan ateve a1 cs ao Ne rasicve ajo. vie opel erscsicelal Sein 8/didlavaieGreie Obie oale oe eae ne 3 PAM Ti DIREC POLL Oe COUN Cll sx, score acamsateyarcloiavarertrele Givinreiecraveiaieieraveeae at qavecoisiannls: e ere rere ore taiaievorele sions 5 PRE DATUUO TSS VALE TELON Uae cinore ssotere sictes ciate ictal aia cuclOstonie sisi o/s re.s euiaie alael@arnievs aawiais siclecinelnatas Greiner 7 LTA gn swustOLe ONATONS aN CLIX CHANEES so |e siessciesaicies dee, sicccierersll cettaineeecmreleieacs a WOMBLE CTO cre ctacioten cocceete wis sie eel aherort meaning aatre, wave ecaliravars: Gueveits. vase: -oiteyatornr eiaiw ole a: aueture eve phate creielerane 9 Repcriote Delegate townoyal Society Of Canadair. ccaccsec sic) ovis) cieiitiens melee nmonene 12 Inaugural Address of the President SWAN ercc UGE On DOR meric ae H, Beaumont Small 15 WNotesionithe®: Hora Ottawaensis. 2... cc sncses0scncdes fate alas nei dais vajeraereieveisle James Fletcher 29 On the Sand Plains of the Upper Ottawa.......... duo Neielvig, is Boiswlalevelas ine ae eltiniee es E. Odlum 38 histof Ottawa Hossils, with introduction. ..00.....000. vescrsseces eras -Henry M. Ami 54 Edible and Poisonous Fung Mies scarecetens Ole. syaroraiaustslaiivare bravest vers slerosi 6 she a Oe geo J. Macoun 62 List of Ottawa Caleanteni: WILLING TO OULG CLOW eleieicvs sisrersictejefe celslcle clelefevelele W.H. Harrington 67 WSELC LOTT ae cyetois ountialoes Gesicievs Memon oath mec lensewaces . Z B. Tyrrell a On the Occurrence of Phosphate in Nature. poecn The Deer of the Ottawa Valley.......... F P. Lett 101 IREPOLUO fst NS (x COLOLTCAIOE EHUIVGIT tiacels eioreiae sioiweievelcoters ah on Oe ni niaieloleye nl efehave) dovere's everace ainiele cielaeiorernere 118 Reportiosathopso tanicalwb ran Cha tmy fare 1a avectoielacrs « toresc eloisite is cera rererelataielorciauw ulefetesimacime ci eteiiers 122 Note on Doassansia oceulta........... ; .W. G. Farlow 127 IREpOnuO Lito CONCHOLOSICAl Bb raANGlia cartels slslolin iacovssslarviown d\etsietelersters ie avein sloise aie hokeic olen oslo 130 HReROTE OlKUN CEH NEGMOLOLICallebs PATI Clit. saya zraveavaporerayerst avai eis a c1sinjfe ceo eke abe cvereve eaves eVezelfesBve Seaselsjesla.sierere 134° Reportot the Omibhological Branly vatesosmaevecisesis cose chleneee, = Mintiemecielerc sale Gieveriesietave 141 HVSTHON ACLU e210 Ol OR OBESTAT lie svete-s e. eare(svereterse cleo sss athe cieleveiale aievave cree ovevere weirs miauerelonreteriereiare 148 OTTAWA, CANADA. CITIZEN PRINTING AND PUBLISHING COMPANY, 3I METCALFE STREET, 1884 Patron : HIS EXCELLENCY THE MARQUESS OF LANSDOWNE, GOVERNOR-GENERAL OF CANADA. President : H. BEAUMONT SMALL, M.D. Vice-Presidents : ist.—R. B. WHYTE, | 2nd.—PROF. J. MACOUN. Secretary: W. H. HARRINGTON. Crensurer : WM. P. ANDERSON. Vibravian : HENRY M. AMI. Conunittec : J. FLETCHER, | }.. B. PYRRELE; | W. L.. S€GRie Standing Committees of Council ; Publishing.—W™m. P. ANDERSON, W. H. HARRINGTON, J. FLETCHER. Excursions.-—R. B. WHyTtEe, H. M. Ami, W. L. Scort. Soirees.—Pror. J. Macoun, J. FLETCHER, J. B. TYRRELL. Corresponding Members : Pin, A. J., AoA.,, Cite, CPR. Port Magy Ee} SAUNDERS, Pror. Wm., 7. 2.S.C., President Entomological Society of Ontario, London, Ont. Epwarps, HEnry, 185 East 116th Street, New York. ANDERSON, Rev, Duncan, JZ 4., Spruce Cliff, Levis, Que, PS Or Vil MBE. Adams, F. D., B.A. Se. Cuzner, W. J. Allan, W. A. Ami... M., BUA. Davy, R. A., GE. Anderson, W. P., C.£. Dawson, G. M., D.S., Assoc. R.S.M., Anderson, Mrs. W. P. LEGS. He tC. Armstrong, John R. Devlin, KR. J. Armstrong, Rev. Wm. J.A. Dickenson, E. A. Dimock, W. D., B.A. Balland, .Rev J. B., O.M1., DD. Dixon, F. A. Baptie, Geo., U.A., M.D. Donaldson, B. Barlow, A. E. Bate, H. Gerald. Ewart, D. Bell, E. B. Bennetts, F. K. Faribault, E. R. Billings, B. Ferrier, W. £. Billings, W. R. Fleming, Sandford, C.Z., C.I.G., Boardman, Wm. F. WV Le ia SAO Boulton, J. G., Staf-Com. R.N. Fletcher, James. Bourinot, Ji. G., £.LS.C. Fletcher, Mrs. J. Bowman, Amos, Fortescue, L. Bradley, Inglis W. Fortescue, Mrs. L. Bristow, A. A. Fuller, Thos., 2.C.A. Bristow, Mrs. A. A. Broadbent, Raiph L. Garvock, W. B. Brough, Jas. 8. Geddes, Alfred. Brumell, H. Pareth. Gemmill, J. A. Burgess, T. J. W., .D., (London, Giroux, N. J. Ont). ~ . Grant, Miss Isabel L. Butterworth, C. A. Grant, J. AS aD. WR. Ss, TGS, LAB S.C. Campbell, Wm. Grant, Miss Jessie. Casey, Maurice W. Grant, Miss Mary. Castleman, J. 8., (Casselman). Greene, G. M. Chamberlin, Mrs. B. Griffin, W. H. Chisholm, A. Grignard, A. Chrysler, F. H., B.A. Coleman, L. H. Hale, J. Coté, P. M. Hardie, John. Cousens, W. C., U.D. Hardie, T. Melville. Craig, Wm., (Russell). Harmon, Miss A. Maria. a 3 Harrington, W. H. Harrington, Mrs. W. H. Harris, W. Dale. Harrison, Edward. Hodgins, John. Johnson, Geo. Johnson, E. V., C.£. Kearns, J. C. Keeiey, D. H. Kilgannon, A. P., C.£. Lamvart, //on. O. H. Lampey, Wm. G. Lutchford, F.R., B.A. Lee, Miss K. G. LeSueur, W’. D., B-A., LeSueur, Mrs. W. D. Lett, Vi. P- Lindsay, A. Loux, Wm., .Wv.D. (Russell). Lowe, John. MacCraken, John I., 5.A. McConnell, R. G., B.A. Se. McGill, A., B.A. Se. MacLaughlin, T. J. McLaughlin, 8. McLean, J. D. McMillan, John, J/.A. Macoun, John, J. 4A., Tf RS.C. Macoun, J. M. Martin, E. D. Matheson, D. May, George. Nicholson, M. Vernon. Odlum, E., 4/.4., (Pembroke). Oxley, James M., LL.B. Parris, Miss Oriana. Parris, Wm. Perley, Henry F., C.Z Poirier, P. 8. vee Saye re + Rauscher, Rudolf. Richard, Louis N., B.A. Se. © Sawyer, D. J. B. Scott, Miss Lilian. Scott, R. D’Arcy. Scott, Wm. Scott, W..L. Selwyn, A. R. RSG. Shaw, James F. Short, John. Small, H. Beaumont, 1/.D. Small, H. B. Smith, Henry R. Smith, W. H. Sowter, E. T. W. Steers, C. J. Stewart, J. C. Summerby, Wm. J., 1/.A.(Russell). Symes, Miss E. Symes, P. B., A.K.C. C., LL.D., FR Thorburn, John, ¥.A., LL.D. Tomlinson, J., CZ. Tyrrell, J. B., B.A., 2.GS. Verner, J. W. D. Watters, Henry. Watts,:d. W. Hook Gcm. Warwick, F. W. (Buckingham). White, Geo. R. W hite, Lieut-Col. Wm. Whiteaves, J. F., F.G.S., FRSC. Whyte, Miss Isabella. Whyte, J. G. Whyte, R. B. Whyte, Mrs. R. B. Wicksteed, R. J., B.C.L., LL.D.,. Willimott, Chas. W. Wood, H. 0O., P.L.S. (Billings Bridge). Wright’ Geo. C. (Hull). Wright, W. R. Young, Jomes. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COUNCIL, To the Members of the Ottawa Pield-Naturalists’ Club: In presenting a report on the work of the Club during the year just closed, the Councii can claim that a large amount of valuable work has been accomplished. Through an oversight in last year’s report no mention was made of the Botanical Class which’ had been conducted during the winter (1882-83) by the President, Mr. James Fletcher. The class was continued in the field during the past collecting season with great success, and has added much botanical strength to the Club. Four regular excursions of the Club were held during the summer. The first was on the 26th May to Kingsmere, a favourite resort of the members. The second was to Casselman on 23rd June, and was perhaps the best excursion yet hell by the Club. The third was a very pleasant trip to Buckingham on 2nd August, while the fourth, through the kindness of Capt. Goulet, of Aylmer, who placed a steam- boat at the disposal of the Club, was to the beautiful Chats Falls on 12th September. In addition, many sub-excursions were held by the different branches on Saturday afternoons, which aided largely in inves- tigating the natural history of the localities visited. Seven soirées were held during the winter, at which valuable papers aud reports were presented, and at which the attendance was very satisfactory. A synopsis of the discussions has been prepared with a view to publication in the ‘fransactions. Classes have been conducted by Prof. Macoun and Mr. Fletcher, in Ornithology and Botany respectively, which will undoubtedly add to the future working strength of the Club. For the prizes announced by the Council for the best collection made during the year in each branch there were no competitors except in Botany, for which the prize—a copy of Gray’s manual-- has been awarded to Miss Isabel L. Grant, as recommended in the report of the leaders of the branch. For the prize offered by the President, Dr. Smull, there were no competitors. The Librarian reporis that a large number of 5 6 exchanges have been received, and that 71 copies of Transactions have been distributed to various societies and correspondents of the Club. Owing to a series of unavoidable delays, the Transactions (No. 4) for 1882-83 were not published as early as would have been desirable, but arrangements have been made with a view to, prevent a repetition of such delays in publication. To improve the standing: of the Club and to enable it to apply to the Ontario Government for a grant to assist 16 in carrying on its work, it was found necessary to have it incorporated, and the requisite papers were accordingly prepared and registered by Messrs. Scott, MacTavish & MacCraken, who very generously declined to accept any fee from the Club therefor. A petition for a grant was also prepared and forwarded to the Minister of Edneation. Under the con- ditions of incorporation, it becomes necessary to make an amendment to one of the rules, and it is proposed at the same time to make such other amendments as may be deemed advisable in order to secure the most satisfactory management of the Club. Thirty-nine new members were elected during the year, and the present membership is 128, as compared with 108 reported last year. The Rev. Duncan Anderson, M.A., of Spruce Cliff, Levis, Que., a prominent Ornithologist, was elected a corresponding member. The Treasurer’s balance sheet shows that there are no claims outstanding against the Club. ‘The reduction in the balance reported is due partly to an increase in several items of expenditure, and partly to a decrease in the amount of back fees received, and in the sale of Transactions. Nineteen meetings of the Jouncil were held during the year, at which there was an average two- thirds attendance of the members, notwithstanding the absence of several of them from the city during the summer. In conclusion, the Council has much pleasure in informing you that His Excellency the Marquis of Lansdowne has graciously consented to become Patron of the Club in the place of our late Governor General the Marquis of Lorne. W. H. HARRINGTON, , Secretary. Orrawa, 18th March, 1884. 7 Rea SU RHA shot ACT EMR NUT Of Receipts and Expenditure for 1883-84. RECEIPTS. EXPENDITURE. Balance from 1882-83... $ 40 31 Stationery, Printing, etc. $ 25 76 Membership Fees....... 109 00 Excursion Expenses..... 23 58 Excursion Receipts..... 24 20 Soirée dO“ Gcea TIGS5 Soirée Gl “Hobo 6 10 Cost of Transactions No.4 116 25 Sales of Transactions... 10. 25 Balance on hand....... 12 32 $189 86 $189 86 WM. P. ANDERSON, 18th March, 1884. Treasurer. LIBRARIAN’S LIST OF DONATIONS AND EXCHANGES. New Brunswick Natural History Society:—*“ Bulletin.” No. 2. Massachusetts Horticultural Society:—“ Transactions,” 1883. Part I. “ Schedule of Prizes,” 1884. Montreal Natural History Society: —“ Canadian Naturalist.” Vol. X, Nos. 7and 8. ‘“ Canadian Record.” Vol. I, No. 1. Buffalo Naturalists’ Field Club:—*“ Bulletin.” Nes. 3, 4 and 5. Boston Zodlogical Society: —‘ Quarterly Journal.” Vol. IL, Nos. 2, 3 and 4. Vol. III, No. 1. Cambridge Entomological Club:—“ Psyche.” Vol. IIT, Nos. 101-2. Vol. IV, Nos. 105-116. Joseph M. Wade:—“ Ornithologist and Odlogist.” Vol. VII, Nos. 13-24. Vol. VIII, Nos. 1-12. John B. Smith:—“ N. A. Heliothine.” 8 American Museum of Natural History:—“ 14th Annual Report.” “ Bulletin.” No. 4. Henry Edwards:—*“ Papilio.” Vol. III, Nos. 3-10. Canadian Institute:—‘“ Proceedings.” Vol. [, No. 4, 5. College of Ottawa:—* Prospectus and Course of Studies, 1£83-4.” Joseph F. James:—‘‘ Revision of the Genus Clematis of the U.S.” Epping Forest and County of Essex Naturalists’ Field Club:—‘* Trans- actions.” Vol. III. Part 7. ; Physikalisch-Okonomischen Gessellschaft, Kénigsberg. Schriften der— 1882. Prof. J. Macoun:—“ Catalogue ot Canadian Plants.”: Part I. Academy of Natural Sciences, California:—‘ Constitution and By-laws.” « Proceedings.” Vols.. V,"V EL, and Part) of Vola Vit George Dimock:—“ Minutes of Meetings of Cambridge Entomological Club, 1883.” “ Microscopy and Histology.” G. E. Davenport:-— Catalogue of the Davenport Herbarium.” ‘“ Sup- plement to ditto.” “ Distribution of Ferns in U.S.A.” R. H. Ward:—* Report on Micrometry.” Toronto Natural History Society:—“‘ Check and Label Lists of Insects of Canada.” United States Geological Survey:—“ Second Annual Report,” 1880-81. “ Hayden’s Geographical and Geological Surveys of the Territories,” Parts | and 2 (1878). “Maps for ditto.” ‘ Monograph, No. 2, Tertiary History of the Grand Canyon District, Dutton.” “Atlas for ditto.” ‘ Bulletin.” No. 1. Lamteth Field Club:-—“ Report,” 1882. American Association for the Advancement of Science:—‘ Proceedings Montreal Meeting,” 1882. James Fletcher:—‘ Reports of Ontario Fruitgrowers’ Association,” 188] and 1882. Torrey Botanical Club:—“ Bulletin.” Vol. XI, Nos. 1 and 2. J. A. Lintner:—“ First Annual Report of the State Entomologist of New York State.” CO Net a Ut TON. (Adopted at a Special General Meeting held 28th March, 1884.) 1. Name and Object.—This Club shall be called the Ottawa Field Naturalists’ Club, and its object shall be the study of the Natural History of this Locality. 2. Officers.—The Officers of the Club shall consist of a President, first and second Vice-Presidents, a Secretary, a Treasurer, and a Libra- rian, who, together with three other members of the Club, shall form a Council, all of whom shall be elected annually, and shall be eligible for re-election, and who shall have the management of all the business of the Club. In the event of any vacancy occurring in the’ Council during the year the same may be filled by the election of a successor at any of its reguar meetings. 3. Auditors.—There shall be two Auditors, elected annually, to examine the Treasurer’s accounts for the following year and report thereon at the next annual meeting. 4. President and Vice-Presidents.—The President shall direct all the business of the Club, and preside at all meetings of the Club and Council; his duties, in the event of his absence, devolving on the Vice-Presidents in their order. 5. Secretary.—The Secretary shall give previous notice to each member of the Club of every meeting of the Club, and to each member of the Council of every meeting of the Council; shall make and keep a true record of the Proceedings of all Meetings of the Club and of the Council; have custody of the Constitution, By-laws, and Records of the Club, and conduct its general correspondence. 6. Treasurer.—The Treasurer shall be charged with the collection and custody of the funds of the Club, and keep a regular account thereof, which shall always be open to the inspection of the Council. He shall also submit at each annual meeting a statement showing the financial condition of the Club. 9 10 7. Librarian.—tThe Librarian shall have charge of all publications of the Club, and shall distribute the same under the direction of the Council. He shall also have the custody of all books and papers belonging to the Club, and shall supervise their circulation among the members. 8. Council.—The Council shall, as business may require, meet from time to time at the call of the President, or of any two officers; shall control all matters affecting the welfare of the Club, subject to this Constitution; shall have full control of the funds of the Club, and shall report its proceedings to the members at the Annual Meeting. 9. Annual Meeting—The Annual Meeting of the Club shall be held on the Third Tuesday in March, at which, in addition to other business, the Annual Report of the Council shall be read, and the Council and Auditors for the following year elected, by ballot after nomination, by a majority of the members present. 10. Special Meetings.—A Special General Meeting of the Club may be called by the Council; and shall be called on requisition of not less than ten members, specifying the business they wish brought before the meeting. The Council shall call the meeting within fourteen days from the receipt of the requisition, giving one week’s notice. No other business shall be transacted than that mentioned in the notice. 11. Conduct of Meetings.—The presence of ten members shall be required to constitute any general meeting of the Club, and of three members to constitute a meeting of the Council. All meetings shall be conducted under such by-laws and rules of procedure as may from time to time be adopted. 12. Proceedings.—Excursions in summer, and Evening Meetings and Classes of Instruction in winter, shall be held, and the Transactions of the Club shall be periodically published; all arrangements for which shall be made by the Council. 13. Members.—Any lady or gentleman desiring to join the Club shall send a written application, signed by the applicant and endorsed by the recommendation of two members, to the Secretary, and if approved shall be elected at the next meeting of the Council. Members desiring to leave the Club must previously settle all dues and signify their intention in writing to the Secretary. 11 14. Corresponding Members.—The Council shall have the power of electing Corresponding Members, who shall be persons not residing in Ottawa or its immediate vicinity, but who may be desirous of promot- ing the objects of the Club. Corresponding Members shall not be required to pay membership fees. 15. Annual Fee._-The annual membership fee shall be one dollar,. payable in advance, due on the third Tuesday in March, and no member in arrears shall be entitled to any of the privileges of the Club. New members to pay the fee for the current year upon election. The payment of the annual fee to entitle a member to receive a copy of the Transactions, as published, and to admission to the Club Soirées, without further charge. 16. Amendments.—This Constitution may not be changed or amended except by a special meeting of the Club called for that purpose, and by a two-third vote of the members present. REPORT TO THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA. (Read at the Second General Meeting, May, 1883.) In the rules adopted at the organization of the Club which I have the hcnour to represent, its object is thus briefly stated: “to study the Natural History of this locality.” During the four years of its existence, a strictly local character has been maintained, and to this we ascribe whatever success the Club bas attained. The general management is under the control of the usual officers, elected annually, but the scientific work is directed by “ Leaders” selected by the Council. The «luties of these “‘ Leaders” are:—To render any assistance in their power to members engaged in collecting and studying in their respective branches; to bring together for mutual aid and encouragement the members interested in the same subject;. to organize and direct work- ing parties; to keep notes of work done, and to report to the Council at the close of the season. _ We are divided into six sections: —Geology—including Palon- tology; Mineralogy and Lithology; Botany; Entomology; Conchology; Ornithology ; General Zodlogy. During the summer our work is entirely in the field. Once a month an excursion is held to some point ten or twelve miles distant, which is well attended, not only by members, but also by their friends. ‘On the first and third Saturdays of each month, afternoon expeditions are taken by members of each branch, under the direction of the Leaders. In addition, throughout the whole season individual work is prosecuted with much zeal and assiduity. In the winter, evening meetings are held once a month. Papers, bearing on the work done during the summer, are read and discussed; collections and specimens are exhibited, and the reports of the Leaders are received. Classes have been conducted for beginners in Botany and ~ Entomology, and it is intended to form others as they may be found wequisite in any branch. Prizes are given by the Club for the best collection in each branch. The President also offers a prize for the best record of original work. 12 13 ‘That the advantages of the-Club may not be confined to the mem- ‘bers, nor the results of our labours be lost to the future, Transactions are published annually. They contain the President’s address; the Secretary’s report; reports of progress in the sections; lists of objects collected and the papers read at the winter meetings. Perhaps the most valuable are the lists. Those of plants, insects, birds, fishes and shells are already very complete. Each year they are added to and new ‘ones commenced. The papers are altogether upon local subjects, and partake both of scientific and economic interest. A few titles will convey an idea of their character:—Geology of the Ottawa Paleozoic Basin, by Dr. Selwyn; Cystidean Life, by Dr. Grant; Laurentian Rocks, by Mr. Adams; Asbestos, by Mr. Anderson; and Coleoptera, injurious to our Pines, by Mr. Harrington. The Museum which we aid our sister society, the Literary and Scientific, in maintaining, also partakes of our exclusive character, ‘consisting entirely of collections made in this vicinity. In a few years we hope to have a museum in which the whole natural resources of this district may be easily studied. Our steady growth and extending influence are very gratifying. Our Club is under the distinguished patronage of His Excellency the Governor-General, and the roll shows gome 120 members; among them being the names of no less than eight Fellows of your Honourable Society. Letters seeking information are continually received, not only from residents of this neighbourhood, but also from more distant towns. Our “ Transactions” and our system have been most. favourably com- mented upon by the leading scientific journals of America, England and Europe; and the continued energy of our members leads us to hope that the vigour of our future will be as marked as that of our past. H BEAUMONT SMALL, M.D., Delegate. —* > ¢ —_f st 4% ik 4 PRESIDENT’S INAUGURAL ADDRESS. H. Beaumont Smart, M.D. (DELIVERED 6TH DECEMBER, 1883.) Members of the Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club, Ladies and Gentlemen: It is with feelings of pleasure mingled with fear that I find myself in the position to welcome you upon this the fifth year of our Club’s history. To feel that I have been considered worthy of occupying the position of President is an undoubted pleasure; yet there is ever the fear that the honour entrusted to me is greater than I have the power tO maintain. Your confidence, I can assure you, has been appreciated; and, in addition to what my actions may imply, I will simply ask you to accept my most hearty thanks for placing me in this honourable position. From its beginning the Club has ever had my co-operation and good wishes; its welfare I have ever striven to promote. The incursions into the realms of Dame Nature, and the friendly intercourse with fellow members have always proved a source of pleasure and relaxation from other more serious duties of everyday life. The acceptance of the office was not without deep consideration on my part. I felt its importance—was aware of the duties it would require—knew that much time would have to be devoted to its work— and weighing all these things carefully, I accepted it, trusting to your forbearance, determining to fulfil all its obligations to the utmost of my ability. Perhaps that which lent greatest weight to my decision was the friendly relations existing with all my confréres in the Council, upon whom I felt I could rely for every aid to make my term easy and successful. Of the many difficulties that must of necessity be met, one in particular will ever overshadow all my eftorts. I refer to the brilliant career of my predecessor in office, for a more untiring, energetic officer, ‘or a more successful period in the history of any club, could not be wished for. Previous to 1879 Natural History in Ottawa ran at Lars 16 random. Such societies as had been formed were devoted to science in general; very little work of any local value had been handed down to us; no effort had been made to study the resources of this neighbour~ hood; there had been no practical working parties, no co-operation of forces; each student followed his own bent, and in many cases trod an unencouraged and unsympathetic path. Seeing whata field there was to. work, and knowing how much could be accomplished by united efforts, our worthy ex-President conceived the idea of the Club; his energy carried it into effect, and his contagious zeal and activity have main-~ tained its successful career. During one year as Vice-President, and three successive years aS President, the bulk of the labour fell on his shoulders, not only the arduous duties of .managing, but also the more valuable work of directing the various branches of natural history, for there is hardly a branch in which there is not some student who can trace a fondness for nature to his assistance and enthusiasm. The result of his efforts is such as he can look at with pride, and were nothing further accomplished he has done enough to have his name for ever associated with the development of our local natural resources. To those who remember the condition of the study of natural science before the formation of this Club, its present popularity and progress tell of a very material change. Workers are now united and” their efforts systematized. . Numbers have been induced to enter upon the study, some of whom form our most active members. Branches hitherto unnoticed now possess energetic searchers. Our Transactions are very creditable. They place on record much local information, valuable not only to us as residents, but to all others, more especially those who may reside here in the future. ‘The geology and stratigraphy are very clearly explained, many minerals of economic value are described, the lists of plants, birds, fishes and shells are ot incalculable value; each year they are added to and perfected, new ones commenced, and before another four years shall have passed, the resources of this district will be so thoroughly known that we shall be sighing for fresh fields to explore and conquer. Already longing eyes are being cast upon surrounding regions. Our limits will soon become a question requiring deep consideration, but I can see that our domain will eventually comprise all that natural basin drained by the Ottawa 17 River ; our chief care being not to extend it too rapidly, but only as. each foot of ground is worked. Our published lists must continue to. comprise only such objects as may be obtained in a day’s outing ; or when they are from any greater distance the locality must be specially named. With such a record for the Club, what wonder that I fear the difti- culty of maintaining its good name and aiding in its bright future. The vista presented to our view is unlimited, for not only is the per- fecting of our neighbourhood before us, but a national work has been begun—could our example but start similar clubs in other districts, their work when added to ours would complete a system unequalled for simplicity and completeness. The scheme is quite feasible. Already several clubs have written for our rules and have commenced a system of field-work. There are naturalists in every district, to start whose energies some central force only is required. Could our national centre of Natural History but see its way clear to assume this duty, the most favourable results would inevitably follow. During the period that has elapsed since I entered into office much work has-been accomplished. The summer has come and gone, during which season the Club has exhibited great activity. This is really the most important period of our year, and the field-work that by which we inust hope to maintain our reputation. To its attractions we owe the favour in which the Clubis held, and the popularity it has gained, and by it we must strive to retain the interest of the members. During the present year the Council has giveu special attention to such work. In the intervals between the regular excursions—in addition to the frequent afternoon and early morning outings—sub-execursions were held every second Saturday afternoon. he leaders received the names of those who wished to accompany the parties and notified each one of the spot to be visited. _ When the locality was favourable two or more divisions would unite. | The progress in some branches has been very pleasing, encouraging the leaders to continue such outings another season, with hopes of still greater success. The regular excursions were also as numerous as in previous years. - It was feared that the sub-excursions would detract from the success of these larger gatherings, but the results show that our fears were not realized. The opening of . 18 the Canada Atlantic Railway has brought new districts within our limits. All who visited Casselman must have been charmed with it as a favourable locality for all departments of natural history. The vast expanse of primeval forest, too soon to be invaded by the lumberman’s axe, affords an opportunity of studying nature that must be seized by our botanists. Late in the season Capt. Goulet, of Aylmer, conveyed the Club in one of his steamers to the “‘ Chats” rapids, affording a most enjoyable excursion, and the members who took advantage of his kind- ness, have, I am happy to announce, presented him with a valuable binocular glass as a mark of their appreciation. In the month of May the meeting of the Royal Society brought many eminent naturalists to our city. It is to be regretted that the - Club did not in some way publicly 1eceive them, so as to enable the members to become acquainted with its savants. Another year it is hoped steps will be taken to remedy this oversight. As you are aware the Council of that Society, in order to inform themselves upon the condition of science and literature in the country, invited repre- sentatives of leading societies to be present at their meeting, and report upon their individaal work. The courteous manner in which the representatives of societies were received and the privileges extended to us made the meeting one continuous source of pleasure. When the reports were read I felt proud of the Club I represented, as no other showed such practical work and usefulness as our own, while the many complimentary remarks received afterwards gave evidence that our system had attracted attention. The papers read were of no interest t> us as a local Club, they dwelt upon, science in general. Several papers were read by members of our Club, but as they were also Fellows of the Society we received no credit for them. Shonld any ‘other members at future meetings wish to present papers, they may do so through their representative, and they will certainly be received with the attention they deserve. The removal of the Ottawa Literary and Scientific Society to thei” new and more suitable quarters was seized upon as an opportunity to ‘secure a permanent place of meeting. As that Society had decided to remodel their museum, continuing one of a local character only, and as it was necessary for us to possess a permanent collection of specimens, — a) i eed 19 rather than form a second and what would have been a rival one, we offered to supply theirs, in consideration of permanent rooms. The conditions are the same as formerly, but as more attention is now to be devoted to the museum, our members will be expected to contribute more freely. The curator will inform us what the museum possesses, donations may then be sent to the Council, who will see that the gift is properly credited. Let us be free and liberal, keeping the Society in our debt ; they have always acted in a friendly manner; let all our endeavours be to continue the amicable relations that should ever exist. Our winter soirées will continue as in the past. The programme prepared presents many features which must prove attractive. The papers of Dr. Dawson and Professor Macoun upon subjects regarding which they are so eminent authorities, will be highly instructive. The paper by Mr. Odlum, one of our new members, residing in Pembroke, is a new feature. This talented gentleman has kindly consented to visit us for the purpose of reading his paper and being present at one of our meetings. I would remind you that in addition to the published subjects there will always be room for notes and communications from the members. It is net necessary that they should be of marked scientific value; some uncommon visit of a bird or insect, or an unusual growth of a plant will prove of interest, and anything that causes discussion will be of value. Should information be required on any point, queries will not be out of order. The result of the summer's collecting may be exhibited that we may learn what others are doing or what the Club possesses. Hach one should feel that the success of the evening in part depends on himself. The aim of all should be to make it as interesting and as profitable as possible, so that we may have, not one long formal] lecture, but short papers followed by discussions of an informal character, becoming even conversational. This year we intend to take notes of the discussion, and embody in the Transactions such remarks as are of a local character bearing upon the subject. The usual prizes are offered to the members for competition. The Club prize remains unchanged; that given by the President embraces a wider field than hitherto, for confining it to additions to published lists was not productive of such good results as was expected, and it is b 20 now open to papers on original work in any department. This, it is hoped, will cause some to exercise their power of observation and impel them to advance in the domain of original research——that only true means of making science progressive. There is one point I would ask you to think over before the annual meeting, that is the name of the Club, which, I think, should be changed, so that it will read the Ottawa Naturalists’ Field Club, instead of the Ottawa Field-Naturalists’ Club. The change of a name is a serious matter always. Here it can hardly be called a change, rather an alteration, and in my opinion a correction. It affords me much pleasure to be able to announce that His Excellency the Marquess of Lansdowne has graciously consented to become the patron of the Club, and I can only hope that our work may prove as interesting to him as it did to his predecessor, the Marquess of Lorne, who always spoke in the kindest manner of our efforts. To a person following the study of natural history, nothing is more essential than a knowledge of the system by which the members of that vast kingdom are classified. | Without this a very important purpose of a name is lost. A name is not simply for the purpose of saving a description when we wish to indicate an object, but it is also intended to intimate the group to which it belongs, and its position or rank in the natural series. ‘The former is of course of primary importance, but the latter is the deeper and more scientific meaning, the inability to apply which constitutes the difference between the ordinary observer or collector and the naturalist. | A person about to travel to a strange country looks on the map to find the position of the spot he is about to visit, notes what other places there are in the neighbourhood and their relative distances. So upon entering the domain of nature should one glance over the map of that country. He should search for his special province and compare it with others, that he may learn its relative position and extent. He should make himself acquainted with its boundaries, and should become familiar with the bordering districts. Should this information be wanting, one of the greatest sources of gratification is lost. In an ordinary ramble innumerable interesting objects are passed by and not noticed. The characters which rank one object above another are not known. Relations and analogies of the greatest importance fail to attract attention, nor does he recognize a part in its many modifications. Upon entering a museum such knowledge is again requisite to appre- ciate what is gathered there. We can only pity the person who wonders why bats are not with birds, or why snakes, eels and worms are in different cases. Throughout nature there are certain principles or relations which, when searched for, furnish the only true guides, and very tew observa- tions of these show that nature has undoubtedly followed a certain plan in producing organized beings. As these beings are scattered all over the globe, inhabiting different elements, this plan is considerably altered and disfigured by modifying influences. The aim is to discover this plan, to trace it through intricate paths, to recognize it in various disguises, and when fully worked out, to draw the lines of demarcation which serve to divide and sub-divide such groups as may be formed. To accomplish this end, the affinities which one object bears towards another must be closely studied. In the animal kingdom those of real importance are found in the internal vital structures, where we must search for the resemblances of a permanent character. A single organ or set of organs maybe selected and followed through its many stages, but the greatest precision is obtained when the organism is considered in the totality of its parts. The external markings though not to be depended upon for permanent characters are fonnd to be of value in determining the minor differences. and forming the lesser divisions. However, as the same influences that modify externally affect the internal arrangement to some extent, these more crude characters serve to point out the path we wish to follow. Such principles may be discovered in a!l systems having any claim to be natural, their correctness depending on the closeness with which the guide has been followed. In the system of Aristotle, formed more than two thousand years ago, we find the first evidences of a natural classification. He studied closely the circulation, and separated all animal life into two groups, corresponding to our vertebrates and invertebrates. One he formed of all those animals possessing red blood, in the other he placed all with a colourless fluid. His further divisions 22 were into those living on the earth, in the water, and in the air, A fourth group comprised all lower forms under the name of vermes. With no previous researches to guide him, and but limited material to study from, he produced this accurate division which all subsequent investigations have only confirmed. For two thousand years this system was accepted. Upto the time of Linnzus, no other successful attempt was made, naturalists devoting their energies to discovering and naming species. Linnzeus seeing the correctnesss of the principle’ adopted, did not form a new scheme, but extended his researches and made a further division into classes. (Addendum A.) It is not for the system that we are indebted to Linneus, but for the firm foundation upon which he placed the science of natural history. He it was who permaneatly formed the divisions of class, order, family, genus, species, and perhaps his most valuable legacy was the method of giving double names, based on the generic and specific characters—a boon few properly realize. His system was published in 1759, and for the next sixty years naturalists devoted themselves to correcting and improving upon it. The beginning of our century saw a marked advance. The Linnzan system was then discarded and that which forms the foundation of all present systems was adopted. In 1819 Cuvier gave to the world the result of his labours, which has continued with slight modification to the present day. I place with it that taught by Principal Dawson, he being our leading Canadian authority, and his system being a fair example of the many in vogue at the present day. (Addenda B. & C.) Cuvier has selected the nervous structures as the means of deter- mining his groups, at the same time giving due weight to the changes in the other vital organs. At one end he separates all possessing a brain and spinal cord extending throughout the body, and an internal skeleton, from which they derive the name vertebrata. At the other end he makes a group of all not formed on the bilateral plan, the parts radiat- ing {rom a common centre, hence their name radiata. The remainder is divided into mollusca and articulata. In the former the nerve centres are scattered irregularly throughout their structure, all being connected with two chief centres situated over the throat. In the other group the nerve centres are arranged as a double chain extending the length of the Stalin) #9 23 body, a set being placed in each articulation or ring. The nervous system is not wholly considered. In the vertebrates a perfect system of respiration and circulation, the complicated digestive process, together with the number of special senses, are all distinctive characters which leave no doubt about placing this group at the head of the list. Of the relative position of the next two groups Cuvier was uncertain. They were not placed one after another, but side by side, the mollusks having a slight precedence. This he allowed, as in them he considered the circulation in closed vessels was more pertectly performed, respiration approached nearer the higher type, and the digestive organs were nearly as complex as in the vertebrates. The articulates he thought iower, as modifications in the vital processes became evident, respiration was not performed by a single organ, but by a series of chambers scattered throughout the body, and circulation and digestion were also performed on a more simple plan. Modern observers however have altered this, placing the articulates decidedly in front. Their external skeletons— the bilateral symmetry of all parts—the distinct members for locomo- tion, and the superior power of directing their movements, place them in a higher scale. The mollusks, on the other hand, although having greater developments of some structures, are otherwise more lowly constituted, their irregularity of structure and want of symmetry causing them to approach the radiates. The last group was easily placed at the foot of the link. Their want of special sense, their simplicity of structure and function, make it difficult to distinguish many of them from the vegetable kingdom. In the formation of classes the same general characters rule, whilst in addition certain characteristics of the group are considered. With the vertebrates, although the various functions are studied, the classes are really formed on the same plan as in the Linnean system. The articulate classes depend on external characters chiefly. The arachnids are highest as they have pulmonary respiration; and are furnished with eight legs. Insects have head, thorax and abdomen, legs six in numver. Crustaceans have their bodies divided into thorax and abdomen, and legs more numerous. Annulata are composed of numerous rings, legs rudimentary and no proper division into head, thorax or abdomen. ‘The cephalopods are the highest of their group, having many resemblances not only to the 24 articulates but also to the vertebrates. The next two classes are accord- ing to their shells. The last class consists of those constructed internally on the plan of the mollusks, but externally resembling the lower group. The radiate classes extend from the well known star fishes to the simple celled infusoria. In deciding the scale of the natural series a certain method has always presented itself, that is, to select a certain point as a standard, compare the objects we wish to rank, and when compared, that which most nearly approaches the standard has precedence. In selecting the standard, that end of the scale is most naturally chosen which is the perfection of all types. Thus, throughout the whole animal kingdom, when we speak of a thing being highly or lowly developed, we refer to it as approaching near to or departing from the likeness of man in the construction of its parts. Up to the time of Cuvier the idea was to form one continuous line from the highest to the lowest form of animal life. Cuvier renounced this plan, placing many of his sub-kingdoms and classes on almost equal footing. He, however, failed to explain the discrepancies or elucidate the plan of his series. This want of regularity has always perplexed classifiers who have followed the Cuvierian school. Macleay, a Scotch naturalist, attempted to arrange all in groups represented by circles, the series being continuous where the circles came in contact. The whole difficulty is due to their observation not being based upon proper theories, These systems have been formed on certain characters, with- out first discovering why these characters were present or ascertaining by what theory they could be explained. They failed to recognize the import of their facts and vontinued their investigations in the wrong direction. At the same time that Cuvier was constructing his animal kingdom, and probably from the same influences that caused him to look deeper than his predecessors, others also commenced to investigate the subject, and although no system was evolved, the principles upon which we must build a system purely natural were discovered. All other systems were formed by studying the characteristics of the natural groups, and then bringing together all to which they could be applied. This method studies nature as a whole, from the most lowly FY we 25 formed to its highest type, and then draws the lines of demarcation, separating group from group. Adult forms are not alone considered. Tt follows the development of each object from its earliest condition, also enlists into its service many extinct forms, and by this means a purely natural system is created, the series being traced from the lowest to the highest creation. I have made a rough outline of the system of Haeckel, based on this method, which is given that you may obtain an insight. In these methods many points require to he proven, many obscurities to be cleared up. There is much work to be done, work which must advance slowly, but as the greater number of leading naturalists are following this plan, we can look forward to possessing, In due time, a perfect system. Of the further division into orders, families, genera and species, the two latter are the most important, as from them the name of the object is derived. The species is the ore of real value, as it is the unit of our systems. When among several individuals we find a peculiarity of form or external marking—tangible and constant—we recognize it as a specific difference, and give it a name according to some peculiar mark- ing it possesses. When among several with such specific differences there is a general resemblance in internal structure, and often to a great extent in external characters, we recognize a natural group and name it agenus. The families and orders are very unsatisfactory, the terms giving no idea of their value. Their distinctions are some general external character which indicates a peculiarity of interna! structure. Mammal orders are according to the hoof and teeth, birds according as they are made for swimming, wading, perching, etc. ; insects according to the character and number of their wings. It is in these lesser divisions that we find the great differences of the many systems. Each specialist generally works independently of those in other branches; one gives a value to his divisions that another does not recognize, reducing orders and making families more numerous or increasing the number of orders and lessening the families. This constructing upon individual authority is very detrimental to the progress of science, as is also the custom of giving names by the same primitive plan. There is hardly an object that has not two or more names, and in indicating it, it is not enough to give a single authority, but it is becoming necessary to give 26 he authority for both the generic and specific names. Another diffi- culty that is increasing te an alarming extent is that of the numerous varieties that are being recognized ; so plentiful are they, that a triple name is now becoming as common as a double one. However, as every evil works its own cure, so from this state we may hope to derive a more simple science, where one name only wili be recognized and no authority required-——a custom now being advocated by many American naturalists. Hitherto the feeble state of natural history has compelled Cana- dian naturalists to cling to the skirts of our friends in the United States, depending solely on them as our authorities. But now with our rapid advance we require a national authority upon such matters, and it is pleasing to know that in the Geological and Natural History Survey, we have our wants supplied. — During the past year, under its authority, has been issued the first part of a catalogue of Canadian plants prepared by Prof. Macoun, which must become our recognized authority. No doubt the energetic director, Doctor Selwyn, will, as researches under his direction are extended, use all endeavours to continue the publication of such aids to enquirers in all other branches of natural history. In offering you these few remarks, my object has been to point out how very important, and what a_ source of gratification must be a knowledge of this nature. If I have impressed you with its value, a little study on your part will soon familiarize you with the subject. Could more of our beginners see it in this light, we should have fewer back-sliders and a host of earnest and energetic workers. In this age it is becoming fashionable to be versed in science, and numbers rush wildly after nature and think they understand what is seen. But they soon tire and wonder where the attraction lies. Others energetically learn names and make collections, but they also tire and gradually lose interest. Would they but master these principles and learn to read the book of nature, its illustrations would afford them unthought-of attractions, and ever present something new. , I would advise all who begin the study to learn the principles of nature, and I promise as their reward a rich treat—a life-long pleasure. s © 27 Nothing is so requisite to the busy mind as relaxation, and how can it be better obtained than by retiring to her solitudes and making com- parison of all the grand and beautiful things that nature has given us. Mr. W. P. Anperson asked whether any analogy could be traced between the classifications of the animal and vegetable kingdoms. The PresipEnT said he thought not, as the classifications were formed quite independently of one another. Pror, Joun Macoun was of opinion that there might be, for in plants, as in animals, there were four principal types: the thallophytes corresponding to the radiates; the acrogens and endogens to the mollusea and articulata, and the exogens to the vertebrata. To make the analogy still more marked he compared the gymnosperms, the lowest form of exogens, with the marsupials and monotremes, the lowest forms of mammalia. ADDENDA. A.—LINNZUS. Diviston A.—Heart of 4 cavities,—2 ventricles, 2 warm and red. auricles,—blood Viviparous—Mammalia. Class I Oviparous— A ves « 1a Division B.—Heart of 2 cavities,—blood red and cold. Having lungs—Amphibia. cee LTR Having gills— Pisces. eS SEV, Division C.—Heart of 1 cavity,—blood white and cold. Having antenne, Undergoing transformation,—Jnsecta. “ Vv Having tentacula, No transfermation,—Vermes. cer SV B.—Dawson. VERTEBRATA. Mammalia— Mammals. Aves —Birds. Reptilia—Reptiles. Pisces— Fishes. ARTICULATA. Arachnida—Spiders and Mites. Tnsecta—Insects. Crustacea—Lobsters, ete. Annulata— Worms. . Mo .uusca. Cephalopoda— Cuttle-fish. Gasteropoda—Univalve Shells, Lamellibranchiata—Bivalves. Heterobranchiata—Tunicates. RADIATA. Echinodermata—S tar-fishes. Anthozoa—Coral animals. Acalephze—Jelly-fish. Protozoa—Animalculz, Sponges. VERTEBRATA. Mammalia. Aves. Reptilia. Pisces. Mo.uusca. Cephalopoda. Pteropoda. Gasteropoda. Acephala. Brachiopoda. Cirrhopoda. 9 “a 8 C.—CuVIER. ARTICULATA. Annelida. Crustacea. Arachnida. Insecta. RaDIATA. Echinodermata. Entozoa. Acalephe. Polypi. Infusoria. D.—ArtTerR HAECKEL. MoneEra. Ne & eS $ “2 = e o a pe ? é Infusoria, ete. GASTRA@A. (Primitive intestinal cavity.) *SUI[MBID ACGLOMI. (Bloodless Worms.) Ca@LoMATI. (Worms with blood.) Stil Sponge, Acalephe. Protozoa E Zoophyta 2 Vermes 3 Mollusea 4 Echinodermata 5 Arthropoda 6 Vertebrata 7 — } | 29 NOTES ON THE FLORA OTTAWAENSIS, WITH SPECIAL. REFERENCE TO THE INTRODUCED PLANTS. JAMES FLETCHER. Read 20th December, 1883. My object in preparing these notes for the Club is chiefly to explain certain points in the flora Ottawaensis which might possibly be misleading to non-resident botanists. In the drawing up of this list which was published in the first part. of the Transactions there were one or two important omissions. The first of these was that there was no mention made of the limits of the locality in which the plants were collected. There is, no doubt, much room for difference of opinion as to what the limits of ‘this locality ’” should be, and it is possible that for useful work it would be better not to tie down all the branches to the same area; for instance, the extent of country which it is necessary for the Geologist to examine is far greater than that required by the Botanist, in forming a general idea of the Geology or Botany of a district, and the same may %e said of the Ornithologist and Entomologist. It is not for me to make any Suggestions here as to what should be the limits of any branch; nor is this a convenient time to discuss such a subject; but I will merely state. that ‘“ this locality,” as far as the compilation of the list of plants was concerned, has up to this time been understood to mean a distance of about 12 miles in any direction from the city, that is, about the dis- tance a collector could travel on foot, when collecting, and return in one day. The extreme limits in different directions have included the country lying between Meech’s Lake, in the Chelsea Mountains, on one side and the Mer Bleue on the other. Down the Ottawa river, East Tem- pleton and Green’s Creek have been included, and, up the river, Britannia. and the islands above Aylmer. There is still a large amount of work to be done in working up the country comprised within these limits. Several districts have not been worked at all and others only visited occasionally. Now, with regard to the list itself. A bare list of names gives no. idea at all of the prevalence of any species in a locality, and this is one of the most important points the Botanist wants to know. Certain plants which are very common in some localities may be very rare here- 30 and vice versa. Then again plants natives of this country, but not indigenous in this locality, occasionally get introduced either by accident or are originally brought here as ornamental plants. These should in some way be indicated as such, or students examining the lists will be deceived. We have now published four parts of Transactions, in all of which there are lists of plants; but only in the last has any of the above necessary information been given. I hope at some future day the Club may publish a full synoptical list of the plants of this locality, giving a short account of each in the same manner that Prof. Fowler did of the plants cf New Brunswick; but in the meantime it has appeared to me that by clearing up the ground as far as we have gone, and drawing attention to some of the most interesting species mentioned in the list, useful work might be done, and that ismy excuse for reading to you to-night what may be to many an uninteresting and dry paper. First of all, I regret to say there are one or two names which have been placed on the list by mistake, of these mention must be made of Amelanchier alnifolia, Aster longifolius, A nove-anglie, Vaccinium vacillans, Sporobolus heterolepis, and also Lychnis diurna—for Lychnis vespertina. There are also one or two concerning which some doubt exists. Anemone multifida, D.C. A single specimen of this plant was given to me by Dr. Small, in 1877, without any data. He told me after- wards that he believed it had been found near the Ritle Range; but as it has never been re-discovered since, the record is not certain. T7ri- JSolium agrarium, L. This name is considered by European botanists to he asynonym of 7’. procumbens, Li. var. My reason for saying there is some doubt about this species is that, although Prof. Macoun only mentions two forms in his new catalogue, we have in Canada apparently three distinct forms, one like each of the European varieties, and this much more robust, erect and conspicuous species, of which I have found specimens two feet in height. It is not common, but has been found several times. However, it always has the appearance of an introduced plant, and it is just possible that the change in habit may be due to climate and soil. Polygonum dumetorum, LiHer. Froma very careful examination of the descriptions of P. dumetorum as well as of a large series of ol specimens from different localities, I cannot satisfy myself that we have the type here, or even in Canada, at all. The variety scandens, Gray, has twice been found in this locality and is a much handsomer plant. nothera chrysantha, Mx. I notice that Professor Macoun has included both this and @. pumila, L. in his catalogue. I have always been under the impression that these two were only varietal forms of one species dependent on the locality where they grew; pumila is found in wet spots by the sides of rivers or in low fields, chrysantha on gravelly banks and in drier places. During the past summer I havehad in flower in my garden a few specimens which varied so much in appear- ance although grown from seed taken from the same plant but which were placed under different circumstances, that I have not yet altered my opinion. If they really be distinct chrysantha must be added to the Flora Ottawaensis. The study of the introduced plants of any locality has many very attractive features; there are so many fields for speculation, and yet, at the same time, with a little study, such a large proportion of the theories can be tested. ‘“ Introduced plants” as understood in the compilation of the Flora Ottawaensis, meant those plants which, when accidentally introduced, were able to survive and mature their seeds sufficiently for these seeds to again grow and complete their cycle of existence. Of course all conspicuous and showy garden flowers which are commonly cultivated for ornament, but which occasionally occur as garden escapes, were omitted. It is not always easy to determine when a plant should be included in snch a list and when not, for it must be borne in mind that by far the larger number of garden flowers are not wild flowers improved by cultivation and so changed in appearance, but wild flowers from other parts of the world only slightly, if at all, altered by climate or the habitat they are placed in. ‘There are a great many of our common wild flowers which are grown with the greatest care in Europe, as for instance the lovely little Anemone Heputica which is the first to remind us of the return of spring, or the deliciously scented May- flower (Lpigwa repens) which under the name of Trailing Arbutus is a favourite green-house plant, also the gorgeous Ladies’ Slippers (Cypri- pedium) with many others of the curious orchid family ; and even here, 32 we ourselves grow in our gardens plants from other parts of the Dominion, as the beautiful British Columbian shrubs, the flowering currant (Ribes Sanguinea) and Syringa, (Philadelphus Lewisii). These lovely shrubs, which are among the most conspicuous objects of our gardens, are found on every hillside west of the Cascades in British Columbia. From the same province, but considerably rarer, are two or three species of Rhododendron. These conspicuous plants, however, do not give the Botanist trouble, because their very beauty draws sufficient attention to them for their whole history to be known—the difficulty is with the inconspicuous plants, such as creep in uninvited and unawares among other seeds ; in fact what we call weeds. But what is a weed? “The dictionaries tell us,” says Dr. Gray (Am. Jl. Se. 3 8. xviii, p. 161), ‘‘any useless or troublesome plant.” “ Every plant which grows in a field, other than that of which the seed has been (intentionally) sown,” says the Penny Cyclopedia. The Treasury of Botany defines it “any plant which obtrusively occupies cultivated or dressed ground to the exclusion or injury of some particular crop intended to be grown. Thus even the most useful plants may become weeds if they appear out of their proper place. The term is sometimes applied to any insigni- ficant-iooking or unprofitable plants which grow profusely in a state of nature and also to any noxious or useless plant.” Dr. Gray’s own definition is ‘plants which tend to take prevalent possession of soil used for man’s purposes irrespective of his will.” Of course in our list of introduced plants those species are omitted which occupy ground in -a state of nature, but which also as weeds conspicuously intrude into culti- vated fields, as Hrigeron Canadense and Ambrosia artemisicfolia perhaps the most weedy looking plants we have. Some plants as Trifolium repens ‘the white or Dutch clover, are truly useful when grown as crops, but ‘a great nuisance when they occur as weeds. Here, as in most of the other parts of settled North America, a large proportion, in fact nearly all, of the aggressive weeds are immigrants from Europe, and it may not ‘be amiss to consider shortly the reason of this, for it is rather remark- able that it should be the case. It is strange, too, that some which are “a great nuisance. here as weeds, in their own country are not at all plentiful, and the converse of this is also true; some species which in Europe are most irrepressible are here hardly able to secure a foothold, 33 but unluckily these are comparatively few, and it is a notable fact that, although so many species of our common aggressive weeds have come to us from Europe, very few from this side have held their own in the old world. A partial reason for this may be that up to this time much more seed has been brought here from Europe for farms and gardens than has been sent back from this side. Dr. Gray’s theory, however, is probably the correct one, and it accounts for the large proportion of the European introduced plants becoming so objectionable here. He points out that, up to a quite recent date, our whole country was covered with forests, and consequently all the indigenous plants would be forest plants. It is apparent, therefore, that for this reason they would be unsuited to live in the open spaces when cleared. On the other hand the hardy European ragamuffins used to pick up a scanty living among flag-stones and upon rubbish heaps, would grow apace when introduced into our rich virgin soil, where there were no rivals to oppose them; thus it is merely a phase of the old story—the survival of the fittest. Of course this argument would also apply to seeds accidentally taken to Europe; they would be unable to survive without the constant supply of moisture in the atmosphere which, through many generations, they had been used to in their native forest. This leads us to another theory viz. : that one so ably advocated before the Royal Society of Canada, by Prof. Macoun, to the effect that the humidity of the atmosphere is the chief element which affects the distribution of the different species of plants. Prof. Claypole (Rep. 3, Mont. Hort. Soc.) argues very elaborately, and possibly with some reason, that the types of vegetation in Europe are of a more plastic nature than those of this continent, from having had, during a long period, to live under very varying circum- stances, and to adapt themselves to many different changes of habitat. In support of this theory he points out that the fossil Floras of Europe and the American of to-day, are very closely allied. He cites some very remarkable instances of Tertiary and Miocene plants, almost identical with existing American forms, and infers that the type of vegetation which we have here now, once existed in Europe as well; but froma lack of plasticity failed to survive. This theory may be partially true, but I think that the humidity of the atmosphere, namely the nature of the habitat, is the chief cause. If it were not she habitat which chiefly 34 affected the existence of introduced plants in any locality, one would suppose that it was due to some quality peculiar or characteristic of the seeds themselves; and this would be, possibly, the line of thought which the mind would naturally at first entertain. Upon examination, however, we are almost startled to find that all the wonderful appendages and beautiful contrivances_for the distribution of seeds, such as the copious pappus of the Composite, the silk of the Epilobium and Asclepias, the spinous, and hooked seeds of the Borraginacez, the attractive esculent fruits and mucilaginous cover- ings of some seeds as well as the buoyant qualities of the seeds and seedpods of certain plants, have little or no effect on the general question at large of the distribution of genera and species of plants over the surface of the globe. It is not so much a question of getting a seed to a certain locality, but of its survival when brought tkere. DeCandolle has worked out this idea in a masterly manner, in his **Geographie Botanique,” and shows from statistics that the inherent qualities of seeds and their receptacles only apply for their distribution in the localities or countries where the plants are indigenous. He draws attention te the fact that many of the plants which apparently have the most perfect contrivances for their transmission from one place to another have an exceedingly limited range, while others with no such appendages are much more widely distributed. The following lists give all the introduced plants which up to the present time have been found in this locality. Iam of opinion that the divisions proposed will be found convenient for the botanical student. List No. 1, Aggressive Weeds, gives the names of all those plants which are so well established as to require constant attention on the part of the husbandman to keep them in check. It will be noticed that some of the names are in italics, this is meant to denote that, although the plant is introduced, it is probable that it also existed here before that time as an indigenous plant. No. 2 embraces those plants, which, having been introduced, are gradually spreading over the locality, but are not yet sufficiently numerous to have become aggres- sive weeds. Of these the two Erodiums and Datura Tatula are interesting examples which were first grown here as Botanical specimens in 1881, but are now to be found in waste places all over the city. — 9 59) No. 3 comprises those species, which, although well established and possibly spreading in a certain locality, are not able to spread far from that spot. Good examples of this class are found in Rosa micrantha, Onopordon Acanthium and Daphne Mezereum, which occur in single localities where there are plants, which are doubtless many years old, but which do not spread by their seeds any distance. No. 4 is made up of those plants which grow for a short time and then suddenly disappear altogether. Most of these have been introduced with seed, or have escaped from gardens; and many of them too have doubtless been introduced from Europe in seed imported as food for caged birds. In this list the most interesting plants are Solanwm rostratum and Hordeum jubatum, the former being a Colorado plant, and the latter a North Western, and both far out of their proper range. They are generally to be found in some of the streets of the city every year; but never regularly nor in the same place every year. 1. AGGRESSIVE WEEDS. Plantago major, L. Verbascum Thapsus, L. Tinaria vulgaris, Miller. Nepeta Cataria, L. Calamintha Clinopodium, Benth. Galeopsis Tetrahit, L. LLeonurus Cardiaca, L. Lithospermum officinale, I. Echinospermum Lappula, Lehm. Ranunculus acris, b. Sisymbrium officinale, Scop. Brassica Sinapistrum, Boiss. Capsella Bursa-pastoris, Moench. Stellaria media, Smith. Silene noctiflora, L. Cerastium viscosum, L. e vulgatum, L. Portulaca oleracea, L. Hypericum perforatum, L. Malva rotundifolia, L. Trifolium pratense, L. KS repens, L. Medicago lupulina, L. Anthemis Cotula, D. C. Achillea millefolinm, L. Leucanthemum vulgare, Lam. —Gnaphalium uliginosum, L. Cirsium arvense, Scop. ‘s lanceolatum, Scop. Lappa officinalis, All. Cichorium Intybus, L. Taraxacum Dens-Leonis, Desf. Sonchus oleraceus, L. Por oaspery, Vill: C Cynoglossum officinale, L. Solanum nigrum, L. Chenopodium album, L. ie hybridum, L. Amarantus retroflexus, L. ae albus, L. Polygonum aviculare, L. as Persicaria, L. g Convolvulus, L. ees Hydropiper, L. Rumex Acetosella, L. / Serispus,, oll, Cannabis sativa, L, Poa compressa, L. “pratensis, L.. Festuca ovina, L. Triticum repens, L. 36 Panicum glabrum, Gaudin. a Crus-Galli, DL. Setaria glauca, Beauv. “« viridis, Beauv. 9 a. WELL ESTABLISHED AND SPREAD- ING. Ranunculus repens, L. Thlaspi arvense, L. Nasturtium officinale, R. Br. i. amphibium, Rh. Br. Barbaraca vulgaris, R. Br. Silene inflata, Smith. Lychnis Githago, Lam. Saponaria officinalis, L. Arenaria serpyllifolia, L. Malva moschata, L. Linum usitatissimum, L. Erodium cicutarium, L’ Her. < moschatum. Trifolium hybridum, L. Melilotus alba, Lam. es officinalis, Willd. Vicia Cracca, L. Pirus aucuparia. Potentilla argentea, L. Sedum acre, L. Conium maculatum, L. Pastinaci sativa, L. Galium verum, L. Kchinocystis lobata, T. and G. (not indig. here). Toula Helenium, L. Artemisia vulgaris, L. is biennis, Willd. (aot indig. here). Eampsana communis, L. Sonchus arvensis, L. Veronica arvensis, L. Mentha piperita, L. Eechium vulgare, L. Solanum Dulecamara, L. Nicandra physaloides, Gzertin. Datura Stramonium, L. - “Patula, di, Chenopodium urbicum, L. Rumex obtusifolius, L. Fagopyrum esculentum, Moench. Euphorbia Helioscopia, L. Phleum pratense, L. Poa annua, L. Bromus racemosus, L. ‘* secalinus, L. Triticum caninum, L. Panicum sanguinale, L. Phalaris Canariensis, L. 3. WELL ESTABLISHED BUT NOT SPREADING. Berberis vulgaris, L. Chelidonium majus, L, Nasturtium Armoracia, Fries. Brassica Napi. ee alba. campestris, L. Raphanus raphanistram, L. Silene armeria, L. Lychnis vespertina, Smith. Saponaria Vaccaria, L. Malva crispa, L. Trifolium arvense, L. “¢ _ procumbens, L. Robinia Pseudacacia, L. “¢ viscosa, Vent. Vicia sativa, L. Negundo aceroides, Moench. (not indig. here). Rosa micrantha, Smith. Sedum Telephium, L. Sherardia arvensis. Sicyos angulatus, L. (not indig. here). Daucus carota, L. Helianthus tuberosus, L. . annuus, L. Rudbeckia hirta, L. (not indig. here). Tanacetum vulgare, L. Artemisia absinthium, L. Onopordom Acanthium, L. Tragopogon pratensis, L. Campanula rapunculoides. Plantago lanceolata, L. st media, J. Verbascum Blattaria, L. Veronica agrestis, L. “ Mentha viridis, L. Hyssopus officinalis, L. Nepeta Glechoma, Benth. Sympbytum officinalis, L, Lycopsis, arvensis, L. Convolvulus arvensis, L. Hyoscyamus niger, L. Nicotiana rustica, L. Chenopodium Botrys, L. eS ain brosioides, L. Daphre Mezereum. Euphorbia Cyparissias, L, Humulus Lupulus, L. (not indig. here). Salix fragilis, L. Populus alba, L. “< dilatata, Ait. Asparagus officinalis, L. Dactylis glomerata, L. Eragrostis pozoides, Beauy. Festuca elatior, L. “pratensis, L. Lolium perenne, L. Setaria Italica, Kunth. 4, UNCERTAIN TENURE. Papaver somniferum, L. 6 Rhoeas, L. Lepidium sativum, L. Brassica nigra, Koch. Camelina sativa, Crantz. OF Spergula arvensis, L. Malva sylvestris, LL. Abutilon Avicennae, Gaertn. Hibiscus Trionum, L. Vicia hirsuta, Koch. “* tetrasperma, Loisel. Anvium petroselinum, L. Carum Carui, L. Coriandrum sativum, L. Bupleurum rotundifolium, L. Ambrosia trifida (not indig. here). Senecio vulgaris, L. Centaurea Cyanus, L. Tragopogon porrifolius, L. Lysimachia nummularia, L. Anagallis arvensis, L. Satureia hortensis, L. Calamintha nepeta, Link. Lithospermum arvense, L. Lamium amplexicaule, L. Asperugo procumbens, L. Solanum rostratum, Dunal. Physalis Peruviana, L. es Philadelphica, Lam. cs pubescens, L. Blitum Bonus-Henricus, Reich. Polygonum orientale, L. Fagopyrum Tartaricum. Urtica dioica, L. Hordeum jubatum, L. (not indig. here). 38 THE SAND PLAINS AND CHANGES OF WATER-LEVEL OF THE UPPER OTTAWA. E. Opium, M.A. (PEMBROKE). —— Read 7th January, 1884. : By the Upper Ottawa, in this paper, is meant that portion of it which extends from the head of Coulonge Lake, a little below the lower end of Allumette Island, to the entrance of Deep River, about seven miles above the head of the same island. This takes in a stretch of nearly forty miles, following the coast line. Enough, indeed, for one attempt—too much to be very minutely handled. By a word picture we shall hurriedly outline the position and nature of this portion of the Ottawa Valley. a. The town of Pembroke is situated on the south side of the Upper Allumette Lake, and about twenty miles from each end of this section, This town furnishes a good point of reference. 6. The Allumette extends throughout a great part of the locality under examination. : ce. The Culbute flows on the north between Allumette Island and the Quebec shore. d. The Upper and Lower Allumette lakes separate Allumette Island from Ontario on the south. e. At the head of the island, westward about eight miles from Pembroke, are the Narrows, where the water flows in a swift current. 7, Eastward from Pembroke, about four miles, are three rapids almost parallel, and unnavigable. These are the Allumette, Lost Chenal and Beckett’s. The last is farthest south, the first farthest north, and the Lost Chenal in the centre. g- Morrison’s Island lies between the two first mentioned, and Beckett’s Island between the two last. h. At the lower end of the Allumette are Paquette’s Rapids, a series of swift, but not very dangerous, currents extending about four miles from Westmeath Village to the head of Coulonge Lake. From the foot of these rapids, the Ottawa, grand, placid and majestic, glides along, joined by the Culbute, into which the Black River enters from Quebec, a couple of miles from its mouth. 39 The beautiful Coulonge Lake lies spread out eastward from this point and is the eastern limit of our subject of study. Turning our attention to the western limit, we may safely say that the scenery among the islands of the Paquette’s, up the Culbute, around the Lost Chenal, through the Allumette lakes, Allumette Bay with its many islands, the Sturgeon Lake and entrance to Deep River, is as fine and enchanting as any to be seen in Canada east of the Rocky Mountains. Dr. Perkins, of Boston, accompanied the writer last summer in circumnavigating the Allumette, and passed through a large part of the district mentioned. This gentleman pronounced it as * grand and beautiful” as anything he had seen in Europe; and he had at that time travelled over most of the Continent. It has been the privilege of the writer to travel over and around our large lakes, through the prairies of the Northwest, the Thousand Islands of the St. Lawrence, the ten thousand islands of Lake Huron, to the head waters of the Ottawa, through the States of Michigan, Minnesota, Dakota and New York, over every tributary on the north shore of the mighty St. Lawrence from the head of Lake Superior to Montreal city ; and, in all these glory-containing regions, the scenery of the Upper Ottawa is not surpassed and seldom equalled. To locate more accurately we may notice that this district lies along latitude 45° 50’, longitude 76° 40’ to 77° 40’, Pembroke being 77° 10’. Height of the Upper Allumette above the sea level 400 feet. The Meteorological Station of Pembroke, under the charge of Mr. A. Thompson, is 423 feet above the sea level. For the most part the important sand plains lie on the south side of the Ottawa. The ancient Laurentians skirt the north side of the river, scarcely retreating over a mile at any place. We may ‘contrast the coast lines of the two provinces as follows: Ontario lies compara- tively low, undulating, and quite unpretentious ; but is well supported by ranges of hills farther south. Quebec, on the north, presents a rugged, massive, broken and barren appearance. w. On the Ontario side, the Chalk River sand plain begins a little above Chalk River Station, twenty miles west of Pembroke, which town it almost reaches. There are a few broken range interruptions towards the lower end of this plain. These interruptions harmonize in 40 position with the rapids, and are parts of natural barriers between a higher level westward and a lower level eastward. At places may be noticed sand ridges. These lie between ancient mouths of rivers, some of which remain to this day, as the Indian, Muskrat, and Petawawa, while others are quite extinct. Following these sand ridges mentioned, or in the direction of the diverging rivers, we invariably come gradually to higher ridges of native rock. The Chalk River Plain wants only the grass to give us a beautiful and extensive tract of prairie land, but as it is wretchedly barren sand, nothing will grow on it to any extent except ferns, small pines and blueberries, the latter in great abundance. b. Eastward from Pembroke the sand stretches struggle with the rising and rocky bases of distant hills which skirt the Ottawa from Westmeath in the direction of Renfrew town. At last the old hills with their stores of marble get the upper hand, and the sand tracts are terminated for a time. c. Back from the Ottawa and between Pembroke and Renfrew there is another factor to be taken into consideration. This stretch of nearly forty miles, ‘extending beyond our present limits, is variegated with sand, clay and irregular hills of rock. One low and very even clay bed contains over 1,000 acres of good and well cultivated land. Before passing to the Qnebec side of the river a few facts may be given which will afterwards form a groundwork of some explanatery remarks. There are many small patches of sand varying from say ten acres to a few square yards. Most of these are easily understood. ‘The operations which are forming the smaller are going on in the presence of the observer. The larger accumulations are met with suddenly after passing ridges of rock in the direction of the running water, while they gradually disappear as-we approach the next range. Wherever there is a small sand patch there is an old but weather-worn ridge of rock close at hand. Nearly always the order is this: Hard massive rock, next large angular boulders of the same, then rolling stones, after which come pebbles, then coarse, followed by fine, sand. The first is always np stream, while the others range in regular order, ending with fine sand farthest down the current. Where there are clay beds mixed 4| with sand the rock ridges are generally farther away, and show a vari- ation in their composition. Speaking carefully we may say that “clay is a soft earth which is plastic and may be moulded with the hands, consisting of alumina, to which it owes its plasticity, and also silica with water.” Putting it chemically we get alumina (Oy, Al,Q) silica (Si O.) and water (H,'O). Tt results from the slow disintegration of one of the constituents of granite rocks, and when chemically pure is called alumina. The farther from the source of formation the purer is the clay, the nearer to its source the more sand is mixed up with ir. Lime, magnesia, oxide of iron and other ingredients are often present. The oxide of iron is a very common and abundant factor along the Ottawa Valley. By careful examination the basins of ancient rivers can be easily followed, with their rapids and stretches of calm water. Even the small bays of olden times may be noted. The kinds, quaiities and layers of sand must be our guide, always aided, of course, by the con- figuration of the immediate locality. Having referred to the qualities of sand and clay we shall now specify. So far as soils are concerned they may be said to come from two kinds of rock, granite and trap. Granites consist of quartz, feldspar and mica, the Jatter generally an insignificant factor. Quartz is flint, or the silica of the chemist. When the granite hills and ridges are washed down by water the ccarse quartz sand lies along the sides and at the immediate base of the hills, while the feldspar is ground to a fine tenacious clay an‘ is carried forward into the valleys. Hence the soil in the flats of granite districts consists of a cold, stiff, wet and impervi- ous clay which needs much manure, draining and labour to make it pro- ductive. The hillsides are almost useless, as they consist nearly altogether of quartz grit. Such are the Quebec slopes of the district we are now studying, but their valleys are too narrow, cramped and water hedged to give sufticient space for the sifting out of the feldspar from the quartz silt. Hence these narrow -valleys are formed of ground-down feldspar and the finer quartz sand, the coarser being left along the mountain sides and close to their bases. It is on this accouné that the French hubitants rejoice in their moderately fertile 42 fields. -In some places the writer has noticed solid bodies of feldspathic clay, but always at a distance from the rock ranges. ‘This clay is ‘known to many under the appellation of pipeclay, and is finer in tex- ture and more coherent than marl. Trap rocks on the other hand, consist of feldspar and hornblende. From this we see that f Idspar is common to both granite and trap. Out of 100 parts of feldspar there are 65 parts of silica, 18 of alumina and 17 of potash and soda; while of 100 parts of hornblende there are 42 parts of silica, 14 of alumina, 12 of lime, 14 of magnesia, 14 of oxide of iron. A granite soil in addition to the silicious sand consists chiefly of silica, alumina and potash, derived from the feldspar. A trap soil, in addition to the silica, alumina and potash of the feldspar contains also much lime, magnesia and iron oxide, derived from its hornblende. Hence as a hornblende soil, or more comprehensively a trap soil, contains more of the inorganic substances most important to plant composition, it is more valuable because more productive than granite soil. There are a few fine stretches of the former, but many of the latter, along the Upper Ottawa. Using this method of comparison, we must conclude that the Upper Ottawa region will never be a first class farming country ; at the very best it can only expect to be considered. middling. But we must return to our line of general observation. Large tracts containing thousands of acres, like the Uhalk River Plain, are difficult to explain. ~ The student must: travel to the mountains miles away, and take in the different ranges, their bearings and the various streams and rivers which have operated during the long ages of the past. In fact it is necessary to make out the differences of water level over vast areas and the causes of the changes in the water line. It is remarkable to see how the terraced work of Morrison's Island fits into the lower system of terraces at the mouth of Black River, where it enters the Calbute.. These points are about ten miles apart. The broad Chalk River Plain corresponds in its two levels with the two definitely marked steppes standing out on the Laurentians near the . head of Coulonge Lake. These two points are at least thirty miles apart. They appear to have been formed during the same water level. 43 At one time, and probably within a thousand years, there was a grand and mighty lake in whose depths were hidden all the Chalk River Plain, the Pembroke district, Allumette Island, and thousands of the arable acres between Renfrew and Pembroke. There were in fact two distinct periods, one of which represented a lake 200 feet deeper than the Upper Allumette, and the other 100 feet deeper. In passing down the Culbute, or emerging from among the islands of the Paquette’s, the terraced ranges which remain as marks of old water levels show themselves quite prominently, and add much to the beauty, splendour and majesty of the scenery. In tracing the various systems of change in the water coast. line, the interest becomes intense as it is discovered, without doubt, thit at one time there was a vast body of fresh water lying over the present Ottawa River, and extending in length over a hundred miles and in width from ten to thirty. In climbing many old weather beaten and water washed rock ranges one can see clearly the holes, cauldrons and water scored channels of bygone days. At the head of Allumette Bay, into which an ancient river emptied, there are many markings left as guides for the future generations. To aid the sceptic, who is naturally hard to convince, in under- standing that the writer is not simply drawing on bis imagination concerning this ancient lake with its far-reaching systems of rivers, most of which are now either wholly dried up or turned into other outlets than the Ottawa River; we shall ask him to add 200 or even 300 feet to the depth of water already indicated. In such case he will have before his vision a body of water as large or larger than Lake Superior itself. During the summer of 1876 A. P. Coleman, Ph. D., at present Professor of Geology and Natural History in Victoria University, B. E. McKenzie, B.A., M.D., of Riverside, Toronto, F. Munson, B.Sc., and the wricer had the pleasure of exploring the whole valley from Ottawa City to the head waters of the Ottawa River. At the head of Lake Temiscamingue we noticed a magnificent range of fossiliferous limestone. - It app2ared to be perched on the top of the granite rock ; but part of it reached into the waters of the lake 44 and was lost to view. We climbed-to its top, 200 feet or more from the water level, and examined it very carefully. Jn richest profusion and in every direction fossils of many kinds were lying. Of course this alone proves the presence cf un inland sea, or a continental ocean. But the point of present interest is the fact that in every direction the operations of water may be noticed. Now if there were grinding, wearing and boring operations of water, we conclude that these took place under the action of rushing rivers. To anyone who has a knowledge of the configuration of the Ottawa Valley the above mentioned fact is enough to prove the presence of a vast inlanl sea which has passed through all the neces- sary changes in the direction of diminution and contraction in order to. leave us our present beautiful river with its islands, lakes, rapids, nar~ rows and variegated coastings. | On the Quebec side of the river there are several. interesting patches of sand ranging from 50 to 300 acres in extent, and many smaller, The most important are at Fort William, the Chapeau and Lynch’s Bay. With these may be included the lower half of Allumette Island. No observer need look long for the cause of these sand beds. Every step of the formation, which is still going on in some parts, may be seen at any time that the snow is off the ground. At one time there were small rivers at many of these places, which were among the ancient feeders of the great lake system of the Ottawa Valley. These. are forever gone from the face of the earth. The Chapeau district is important from the fact that there are two distinct and prominent water lines. One of these corresponds with the second steppe at the head of the Coulonge Lake, and also witi the Chalk River Plain, which is the largest within the forty miles under consideration. The ‘average height of the lower of these two near Chapeau is. about 20 feet, and of the upper about 120. Through the upper and almost on a level with the lower, a large creek or small river meanders. from among the Laurentians, and quietly loses itself in the gently flow- ing Culbute. The lower part of Allumette Island is a solid mass of sand, an‘l is. on the same general plain as the lower range at the Chapeau. 45 About four-fifths of the whole surface of the island and fully three~ fourths of its entire length were formed by sand washed down from the mountains of Quebec, as were also many of the sand patches on the Ontario side. Let us now look into the causes of these formations and changes. It may seem almost superfluous to make any special and minute refer- ences to the origin of these or any sand_plains. But it will be of help to some if a few of the particulars are given. Sand is finely ground rock. Mountain ranges are constantly worn down by the action of heat, frost, wind and rains of the ever-varying seasons. Tt is instructive to watch closely all these agents as they do their work. Any day in the year, any hour in the day, the student may examine and learn much. ‘To quote from notes of a trip through the mountains last July will aid us in this connection. “ We left our camp near the Chapeau, walked along the sand, among the beautiful pines on the lower level a little way back from the Culbute, and ascended the first height of 120 feet. The view thus gained was fine, and a very pleasing foretaste of what was to foliow. Directing our steps towards the mountains about three miles distant, we crossed a beautiful river with wonderful embankments of sand over 100 feet high. Here we sat, observed and wondered. During perfect calmness of the air the sand kept sliding down in ten thousand almost inperceptible streams, and was hurried along by the swift waters of the river. This sand is forming a bed near and beyond the mouth of the river. ** At one place in this plateau valley there is a washout close to the point of observation. By a rough but. sufficiently careful method of calculation we concluded that from 2,000,000 to 4,000,000 cubic feet of sand had been washed away from one small field. Rain begins to fall. The ascent is begun in earnest. The top of the highest peak must be reached. More than an nour is spent in climbing from crag to crag. At length we look down hundreds of feet below us on clouds and rainstorm. ‘‘To stand on the Laurentians during a July rainstorm, and to tuke in all the strange and hazy grandeur, is one of the richest 46 treats of a lifetime. The heavens are cleared in patches, the sun shines through the rifts, the rain falls, and rainbow-tinted glory decorates the heavens. ‘The sight is truly grand. “Tn ascending these mountains we started from their resting places large and small stones, which rolled down hundreds of feet. Boulders when displaced bounded forth with tremendous force and crashed through the trees below with irresistible violence. “Streams caused by the falling rain were hastening down the precipices and gorges, carrying with them myriads of shining sand grains. These if examined under the microscope would be found to be granules of mica, quartz, feldspar and hornblende. On the very sum- mit could be seen the simplest formation of these streams. Many almosi invisible streams, each formed by a few drops of rain, were uniting and forming minute currents of water following the inclines and slightest indentations of the rocks. On careful examination fine grains of sand could be detected even in the spreading-out rain drops and on the bare head of the hardest and smoothest gneiss rock. In descending we reached the converging points of the sthaller streams, and finally the home of the torrents furiously leaping through the deep gorges, and issuing with terrific force to join ‘the brimming river.’ Here we noticed something more than sand. Pebbles and small sized Stones were violently borne along and deposited in the less rapid water. ‘These are covered by the sand and soon lost to sight, but aid in filling up the valley. “Tn sunshine and calm we ascended the same peaks the next day. Along the top, at the very summit, we looked carefully to see .if any sand grains were left. To our great astonishment, in every direction, we found sand in quantities varying from a cubic foot to a single grain. “Our curiosity being aroused, we examined not only the top of the bare peak, but the tops of loose boulders, and even the upper edges of small sized stones, Strange but true, this next day after a drenching rainstorm, which finished up not suddenly but very gradually, and in the warm month of July, grains of sand were lying loose on every . spot which was examined. “ Another similar rainstorm would wash these grains away, and their places in turn would be occupied at once by other sparkling points. 47 “On further observation we discovered a constant movement of exceedingly fine sand dust caused by the gentlest zephyrs. While descending we noticed several places where the sand was actually trick- ling down the crevices. Streams of sand, varying and spasmodically fluctuating, were constantly lessening the mass above and filling the hollows below. “‘ So far we have said but little concerning the cause of sand forma- tion or rather rock wearing during summer weather. At any time during the warm summer months fine sand dust may be discerned even on clean-looking boulders by means of a small magnifier. “The weather-beaten exterior of all rocks is more or less cracked and granulated. Numberless fine cracks ramify in all possible direc- tions. Many of these are invisible to the naked eye. When the rain falls the water saturates the surface. After a little while the tempera- ture rises. The expansion of the moisture in the cracks pries off many small grains of sand. In fact we are safe in saying that during the months of warm weather the contraction of the rock surface in the night, and the expansion consequent upon the heat of the following day, without any reference to dampness, wears away the rocks con- stantly.” When we remember that this section of the valley under consider- ation belongs to the oldest of all geological periods our interest must increase. Geologists have marked out over thirty geological divisions. Here, however, there is one, the oldest, the Archean, of which Dana says: ‘ There was first an age or division of time when there was no life on the globe ; or if any existed this was true only in the later part of the age, and the life was probably of the very simplest kinds. The Arcuzean stands apart as preparatory to the age of invertebrates.” Now in saying that this district belongs to only one geological period we do not mean that there has been no change during the many ages of the past. But we do mean that the rocks are Archean with a base surrounding of their own refuse and ruins. Some would prefer to say that the first and last geological periods meet in this valley. Here the Aozoic stanas out in majestic sublimity, looking down upon the only child of its many years, ‘This could be called the Quaternary period, and, Minerva-like, came from the head rather than the loins of its pro- 4 (o2) genitor. Siace the latter is nothing but the ground grit of the former, it is immaterial whether we say there is a blending of two periods, or the full age and chronicled history of the Archean alone. This history may be epitomized as follows : a. The earth’s foundation rocks were formed during the first geo- logical period. b. In many parts of the world the earth building went forward. c. Various courses of material, called stratifications, have been deposited upon these foundation stones. d. Many parts of the old formation rock were never utilized for building purposes ; as the Laurentians of the Ottawa District. e. As they were not built upon they were left unprotected. f. The warring elements during many cycles of time have con- ‘tinued to grind these foundation stones to powder, which still lies at their base in the form of sand plains. Passing forward to another part of this subject, we acknowledge frankly that there are serious difficulties staring us in the face. The changes of the water level are necessarily linked with the different sand plains. It is absolutely essential to have different kinds of measurements for our work, such as present water depths, mountain heights and water levels as compared with the sea. The length and breadth of rivers, lakes and plains are also needed. Anyone knows that the acquisition of all these and many other measurements involve much labour, time and expense. Few earnest students of nature are blessel with all the requisites for accurate observation concerning much of vast importance. Besides, the time marks of the Ottawa Valley are very indistinct. Their language is scarcely known as yet, and is hard to master. One kind of measure- ment alone is left us, and that may give us some help whea acquired and used. This is space and lineal measurement. We venture to express an ardent wish that before many years have passed away a tabulated list of careful observations and measurements may be obtain- able. In this connection we deem it quite in place to suggest that the Government establish a meteorological station at the Chapeau, and also at DesJoachims. We think, moreover, that the weather gaugers at these stations should be required to give extensive and accurate lists of actual measurements of heights and distances. 49 In this paper it has been already assumed that at one time there was an extensive inland lake, which has gradually lessened till a few small lakes and river stretches alone remain. The cause of the diminu- tion is easily seen. The water has worn down the channels at what were formerly rapids. When vast quantities of water rush annually over rock surfaces the river beds must be lowered. Observation will show that the rapids of the Upper Ottawa are natural barriers hetween an upper and a lower water level, and between the rapids there are even lakes or large river expansions. Witha given quantity of water, a constant unit of time, and a homogeneous hardness of rock, the rate of lowering of channel must be regular unless the seasons, rains and freshets vary greatly. Even if all these were constant and regular at present, we would be unable to locate the time in the past when the mountains were 100 feet higher, or when any given river channel was 20 feet higher than now. By an examination of the rocks we can easily perceive that the hardness varies. For example, the rock beds at the Narrows, a few miles west of Pembroke, are very hard, say seven degrees out of a pos- sible ten. But the channel rocks of the Allumette Rapids at the opposite end of the lake from the Narrows, are only five degrees of hardness. These rocks are a fine sandstone compacted with a bluish or brown clay. The corroding action of the water tells readily upon the clay, and thus the sand grit is washed from the surface. What do we learn from this simple fact? This : The space between the two rapids must be gradually drained of its water by the greater corrosion of the lower rapids. This means that the present Upper Allumette Lake is drying up, or draining off through the Allumette Rapids becoming lower. This in turn means that the now navigable “ Narrows” will in ‘time become too steep and shallow for steamboats to pass. But the now unnavigable Allumette Rapids by that time will be navigable. These are changes going forward to-day, an1 will be facts of the future. Again let us compare four parallel rapids, the Allumette, the Lost Chenal, Beckett’s Chenal and the “ High Water Portage,” an old chan_ nel of the river, but now completely dry even during high water. The vocks of these four channels are all of different degrees of hardness. 50 The “ High Water Portage” rocks are the hardest, Beckett’s Chenal next, then the Lost Chenal, and lastly the Allumette. After examining these different channels, their positions, their volumes of water and the whole basin, we find that the volumes of water vary in inverse order, beginning with the Allumette, the largest ; which means that the oldest channel has least water (it has none now), while over the soft bed of the youngest the bulk of the Ottawa rushes with a constantly increasing effect. My attention was attracted to the ‘‘ High Water Portage” by the bare and dry water-eaten rocks. The channel is as easily traced as if carrying water. The rocks are extremely hard. Beckett's Chenal shows a softening in its bed, but the Lost Chenal is more marked in this respect: clayey sandstone beginning to show itself. But when the Allumette bed is examined the conclusion must be that this chan- nel is destined to carry all the water of the Ottawa alone. Then there will be three old and dry channels. This is an inevitable result unless the present soft Allumette channel bed is thinly built upon a hard and more enduring foundation. By this particular comparison and con- clusion we are now prepared to rise to a higher plane of study. In such a system of scattering mountains as the Laurentians there are and have been many rivers. These rivers have had many mountain barriers to overcome. They have passed over the lower parts, and cut their way through the softer ridges. At one time in the past a river has rushed wildly along through a rugged and adamantine channel. Now in the later ages of the world the same river lashes itself into fury as it passes through a channel 100 feet below. Some beautiful and clearly outlined old channels of the Ottawa are easily seen not far below Aylmer. The Paquette’s Rapids at the head of the Coulonge Lake are com- ; posed of harder rock than the bed of the Allumette. The result will be that the Upper and Lower Allumette lakes will eventually form one navigable stretch, limited at the western extremity by the ‘“‘ Narrows,” and at the eastern by the Paquette’s, At one time the ridges back from Westmeath connected with the ranges on the Quebec side of the river. Over these ridges the mighty Ottawa River Lake hurled itself into a vast abyss of seething waters at 51 least 200 feet below. From this fact, and also from many observations at scores of points westward along both shores and for hundreds of miles up the river we have concluded that there was once a mighty and expansive inland lake of fresh water, as previously stated. In the interests of science and natural history this and other science associations should memorialize the Government to aid im accumulating vast stores of facts and observations. The present meteorological system is good, but needs extending and perfecting. More work needs to be performed. Not only should the general geology of Canada be studied on an extensive plan, but the tem thousand points of minutest details should be secured and placed within the reach of the earnest students of nature. Mr. Wo. P. Anperson said he had, during the previous summer, seen the district described in Mr. Odlum’s paper, and was then greatly impressed by its beautiful scenery and geological interest, and could now bear testimony to the fidclity of Mr. Odlum’s graphic descriptions. He enlarged upon the nature of the sand flats at the mouth of the Petewawa and in the vicinity of Fort William, and described the granitic islands at the Narrows. He did not consider the evidence adduced by Mr. Odlum in favour of a much higher level of water by any means conclusive, as it was well known that changes of level were of constant occurrence, particularly near volcanic centres, which made it quite probable that the fossiliferous beds alladed to had been deposited at a much lower level, and raised when the Laurentians were subject te seismic disturbances; just as similar action was, even in the present day, insuring our planet against the fatal dead level so feared by Me. Odlum. He had also proved, by personal observation and measurements upon the sand hills of the Assiniboine Valley, that under certair conditions, the wind was so directed into currents by the inequalities of the ground as to actually drift sand up hill, and deposit it on the very tops of certain hills where different currents met and counteracted { F 3 ~ oS each other, so thatit was unsafe to infer that the tops of present sand hills had at some past time been beneath the surface of the waters.* Pror. Macoun drew attention to the effect of sand plains upon temperature and rain fall. He had frequently noticed on the great plains of the Northwest that clouds in passing over tracts destitute of vegetation, and consequently radiating much heat -were rendered invisible and dispersed, but when carried over wooded regions, again appeared and were frequently precipitated in refreshing rains. Dr. May (Ontario Education Department) congratulated the anembers on the activity of the Club. He corroborated the statements of Prof. Macoun, and made special reference to the injury co. tinually being done to the country by the reckless deyastation of the forests, which ‘were now known to be s) necessary in equalizing the water supply. Dr. R. J. Wicksteep stated that his own observations sustained the theory advanced by Mr. Odlum as to the extent of the country oace covered by the Ottawa River, or rather by the chain of lakes or expansions, at one time connected by that river. In October last, while on a lecturing tour in aid of church missions, he had spent some days in that district. The line of travel from Westmeath to Rockingham does not deviate much from a due southwest course, or one at right angles to that of the present Ottawa River. The distance between these points is, as the crow flies, about 40 miles, but by the stage route 65 miles. At Westmeath, on the Lower Allumette Lake, (an expansion of the River Ottawa) there lies to the west, the large Allumette Island, (evidently an ancient sand bar or shoal) dividing the river into two parts. To the north, and distant about six miles is seen the high (Quebec shore of the 1iver. From Westmeath to Beachburg, seven miles, the soil is light sand, deposited by the mighty river once flowing * Mr. Anderson appears inclined to think that his reference to “the Sand Hills of the Assiniboine Valley” is suffi ient to throw some doubt on my explana- tion concerning the sand formations. Having travelled on foot over the Assiniboine sand hills, as well as the Ottawa plains, I may state there is a marked difference. Any person who wishes to examine closely will find that the Assiniboine hills are free of stone, boulders and drif*, whereas the Ottawa sand plains are well dotted with all these, showing remains of pine roots, knots and branches, cedars and various other remnants of floated matter. But when hills of sand are formed by wind currents, boulders and other heavy material will be absent. (Note by Mr, Odlum.) 53 there. From Beachburg to Cobden, nine miles, the road descends into an old lake bottom, the lake represented by Musk Rat Lake, stiff clay soil and banks-proclaiming this fact. The land rises abruptly from the lake to Cobden, and the soil becomes sandy again; but whtn about one mile from Cobden, the road dips again and proceeds on corduroy over clay lands and marsh bottoms, for about three miles. The line of road then commences to rise, and thence to Eganville and beyond to Rock- ingham the ascent is quick,and the country rugged, the habitat of those giants of the forest, the white pine and hemlock trees. His impression was that in very ancient times a mighty stream rushed over the country extending from the present Quebec shore of the Ottawa River to the neighbourhood of Eganville; and that the sand was deposited behind ripple bars formed by rocky prominences. The mud or silt was the deposite of two sluggish lake-like streams, now almost dried up and runniug no longer; the one represented by the Musk Rat Lake and River, and the other indicated by the Osceola River, running about three miles to the southwest of Musk Rat Lake. Mr. W. H. Harrineton having travelled up the Ottawa as far as Deux Rivieres, and through the district described by Mr. Odlum was able to bear testimony to the very abundant evidences of former high water levels, as evidenced by the sand plains so well described and by the unmistakeably water.worn and sculptured rocks seen on all the portages, and along the banks of the river. In the water-scored rock bottoms of old rapids are frequently found conspicuous cylindrical holes, varying greatly in depth and diameter, which are undoubtedly due to ancient powerful currents, and which are popularly known as pot holes. These abound in the vicinity of Ottawa, at varying distances from the river, and at different elevations above its present level; sometimes. forming natural wells of which settlers have availed themselves. At Deux Rivieres is shown a notable one called ‘“Noah’s Churn” which is situated many feet above the river, in the rocks on the upper side of the “Devil’s Portage.” Although very symmetrical in shape, it is not of unusual size, being only about three and one-half feet in diameter and some eight or ten feet deep, the exact depth not being determinable on account of the hole being partially filled with earth. The name D4 indicates that local tradition does not in this instance sustain the view expressed by Mr. Odlam,-that these high-water levels may have existed only a thousand years ago. LIST OF FOSSILS FROM OTTAWA AND VICINITY. Henry M. Amt, B.A., Seconp AssIsTANT PALHONTOLOGIST TO THE GEOLOGICAL SuRVEY OF CANADA. Read 7th January, 1884. INTRODUCTION. In order to bring together in as systematic and compact -a form as possible the numerous species representing the fauna of the Paleozoic and other rocks about Ottawa—heretofore scattered in the various paleontological publications of the Geological Survey of Canada, and chiefly from the pen of the late Mr. E. Billings—it has been deemed advisable to catalogue the same. The list is a purely local one, and is intended merely as a basis for future operations in this locality. Valuable assistance was obtained from the elaborate collections made by officers of the survey during years past, especially those of the late Messrs. E. Billings and James Richardson. Only those species which are of local interest appear in the list. The number of these has been considerably increased by the subsequent researches of Messrs. T. C. Weston, Walter R. Billings and A. H. Foord, F.G.8., as also by the evidence obtained after five seasons’ collecting in this locality by the “writer. The species are classed under the respective formations to which they belong. It has been deemed neither requisite nor even advisable to refer the species and genera to sub-orders and families, seeing that at present so much diversity of opinion exists on the subject. Only the class under which the generic and specific names appear is mentioned, and will, no doubt, prove quite sufficient for all purposes. 5d There are included in the list 253 species as representing the fossil fauna and flora of our rocks. This number will evidently be swollen considerably by subsequent researches, as the measures are highly fossiliferous and the exposures extremely numerous. Some species described and recorded by Billings and others, have been excluded from the list because the types are lost or misplaced — these it would be well to bear in mind as desiderata. Several new species of Paleozoic Polyzoa, recently described by Mr. A. H. Foord, and published by the Geological Survey, are incor- porated in the list. The valuable catalogue of Paleozoic Fossils by Mr. S. A. Miller, of Cincinnati, Ohio, has been used to advantage. CAMBRO-SILURIAN SYSTEM. CHAZY FORMATION. PROTOZOA. Stromatocerium rugosum, Hall. Pouyzoa. Prasopora Selwyni, Nicholson. BRACHIOPODA. Lingula Belli, Billings. Orthis imperator, Billings. Rhynchonella plena, Hall. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. : Cyrtodonta breviuscula, Billings. GASTROPODA. Pleurotomaria pauper, Billings. ANNELIDA. Serpulites dissolutus, Billings, or a very closely allied species. CRUSTACEA. Isotelus canalis, Conrad. Leperditia Canadensis var. nana, Jones. 56 BIRD’S EYE AND BLACK RIVER FORMATION Protozoa. Receptaculites occidentalis, Salter. Stromatocerium rugosum, Hall. PoLypl. Columnaria Halli, Nicholson. Streptelasma profundum, Hall. Tetradium fibratum, Safford. BRACHIOPODA. Rhynchonella increbescens, Hall. Streptorhynchus filitextus, Hall. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA, Cyrtodonta subtruncata, Hall. GASTROPODA. Pleurotomaria subconica, Hall. : CEPHALOPODA. Cyrtoceras falx, Billings. Ry sinuatum, Billings. ee vagans, Billings. Gonioceras anceps, Hall. Oncoceras constrictum, Hall. Orthoceras (Ormoceras) Bigsbyi, Stokes. ef bilineatum, Hall. & decrescens, Billings. ig rapax, Billings. CRUSTACEA. Illzenas Conradi, Billings. rs ovatus, Billings. x Trentonensis, Emmons. Leperditia gracilis? Jones. TRENTON FORMATION. PLANT#&! Buthotrephis gracilis, Hall. Palzophycus obscurus, Billings. Licrophycus minor, Billings. a Ottawaensis, Billings. eS succulens, Hall. PROTOZOA. Astylospongia parvula, Billings. Pasceolus globosus, Billings. Receptaculites lowensis, Billings. a occidentalis, Salter. t bo | —) Po.yret. Diplograptus amplexicaulis? Hall. Paleophyllum divaricans, Nicholson. Petraia Ottawaensis, Billings. Protarea vetusta, Hall. Streptelasma corniculum, Hall. CRINOIDEA. Archeocrinus lacunosus, Billings. cs marginatus, Billings. es microbasalis, Billings. pyriformis, Billings. Calceocrinus articulosus, Billings sp. ee inzequalis, Billings sp. Cleiocrinus magnificus, billings. a regius, Billings. Dendrocrinus gregarius, Billings. oe humilis, Billings. ee proboscidiatus, Billings. es rusticus, Billings. uC sinilis, Billings. Glyptocrinus decadactylus, Hall. oe parvus, Hall. 6 quinquepartitus, Billings. sf ramulosus, Billings. Heterocrinus Canadensis, Billings. Ss tenuis, Billings. Hybocrinus conicus, Billings. se tumidus, Billings. Tocrinus subcrassus, Meek and Worthen. Lecanocrinus elegans, Billings. cL levis, Billings. Paleocrinus angulatus, Billings. | a pulchellus, Bi'lings. es rhombiferus, Billings. Porocrinus conicus, Billings. Reteocrinus stellaris, Billings. CyYSTOIDEA. Amygdalocystites florealis, Billings. at ‘var. levis, W. R. Billings. me radiatus, Billings. ue tenuisiriatus, Billings. Ateleocyst'tes Huxleyi, Billings. Comarocystites punctatus, Billings. Glyptocystites multiporus, Billings. Lichenocrinus crateriformis, Hall. 58 Pleurocystites elegans, Billings. se filitextus, Billings. iS robustus, Billings. “é squamosus, Billings. ASTEROID. Agelacrinites Billingsi, Chapman. sf Dicksoni, Billings. Cyclocystoides Halli, Billings. Edrioaster Bigsbyi, Billings. Palasterina stellata, Billings. Petraster rigidus, Billings. Stenaster pulchellus, Billings. bie Salteri, Billings. Teeniaster cylindricus, Billings. POLYZOA. Amplexopora discoidea, James sp. Arthroclema pulchellum, Billings. Batostoma Ottawaense, Foord. Constellaria antheloidea, Hall. vi florida var. plana, Ulrich. oe ypa regularis, Foord. Witicicat Nicholson. Heterotrypa solitaria, Ulrich. Homotrypa similis, Foord. Monotrypella Trentonensis, Nicholson. Monticulipora Billingsi, Foord. “ parasitica, Ulrich. Ue Westoni, Foord. Prasopora affinis, Foord. =f oculata, Foord. oa Selwyni, Nicholson. Ptilodictya falciformis, Nicholson. * maculata, Ulrich. = pavonia, d’Orbigny. Retepora Trentonensis, Hall. Spatiopora areolata, Foord. Stictopora acuta, Hall. paupera, Ulrich. Tetradium? Peachii, var, Canadense, Buiesineohe: Camerella hemiplicata, Hall. bi! bisuleata, Emmons. Discina Circe, Billings. Lepteena sericea, Sowerby. Lingula Philomela, Billings. Foord. 59 ‘Orthis Iphigenia, Billings. “« — Merope, Billings. ‘¢ subquadrata, Hall. ‘¢ — testudinaria, Dalman. “« tricenaria, Conrad. Platystrophia biforata, Schlotheim, var. lynx, Rhynchonellaincrebescens, Hal. y recnrvirostra, Hall. Orthisina Verneuili, Eichwald. Streptorhynchus filitextus, Hall. ys planumbonus,, Hall. -Strophomena alternata, Conrad. ts deltoidea, Conrad. et recta, Conrad. a Thalia, Billings. Trematis Ottawaensis, Billings. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. Ambonychia amygdalina, Billings. Ctenodonta gibbosa, Hall. Ss levata, Hall. a ge nasuta, Hall. Modiolopsis carinata, Billings. = Gesneri, Billings. Pterinea Trentonensis, Conrad. PTEROPODA. Conularia Trentonensis, Hall. GASTROPODA. Bellerophon bilobatus, Sowerby. “ sulcatinus, Emmons, Cyclonema Montrealense, Billings. Ecculiomphalus Trentonensis, Conrad. Murchisonia bellicincta, Hall. & gracilis, Hall. ee Milleri, Hall. Ophileta Ottawaensis, Billings. Pleurotomaria Daphne, Billings. Subulites Richardsoni, Billings. me subfusiformis, Billings. Trochonema umbilicatum, Hall. CEPHALOPODA. Endoceras proteiforme, Hall. Orthoceras amplicameratum, Hall. “s Ottawaense, Billings. es Python, Billings. xe vulgatum, Billings. as Xiphias, Billings. Kichwall. 60 ANNELIDA. Conchicholites flexuosus, Hall. Serpulites dissolutus, Billings. CRUSTACEA. Asaphus megistos, Locke. «« platycephalus, Stokes. Bronteus lunatus, Billings. Calymene senaria, Conrad. Cheirurus pleurexanthemus, Green. Dalmanites Achates, Billings. es Bebryx, Billings. callicephalus, Green. Encrinurus vigilans, Hall. Harpes Dentoni, Billings. ‘* Ottawaensis, Billings. Illenus Americanus, Billings. ee Milleri, Billings. UTICA FORMATION. Hypbrozoa. Didymograptus annectans, Walcott sp. sy flaccidus, Hall. Diplograptus mucronatus? Hall. a pristis? Hisinger. es quadrimucronatus, Hall. Sagenella ambigua, Walcott. PoLyzoa. Stictopora acuta, Hall. BRACHIOPODA. Leptzena sericea, Sowerby. Leptobolus insignis, Hall. “ occidentalis?, Hall. Lingula Daphne, Billings. «¢ obtusa, Hall. * Progne, Billings. ‘¢ quadrata, Eichwald. Orthis testudinaria, Dalman. Schizocrania filosa, Hall. Siphonotreta Scotica, Davidson. Strophomena alternata, Conrad. Zygospira Headi, Billings. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA, Lyrodesma pulchellum, Hall. Modiolopsis modiolaris, Hall. 61 Orthodesma parallelum, Hall. Pterinea insueta, Conrad. . Trentonensis, Conrad. PTEROPODA. Conularia Hudsonia, Emmons. as Trentonensis, Hall. GASTROPODA. Bellerophon bilobatus, Sowerby. Murchisonia Milleri, Hall. Pleurotomaria subconica, Hall. Trocholites ammonius, Conrad. CEPHALOPODA. Endoceras proteiforme, Hall. eS ‘ var. tenuistriatum, Hall. Orthoceras amplicameratum, Hall. <¢ coralliferum, Hall. = lamellosum, Hall. ANNELIDA. Serpulites dissolutus, Billings. CRUSTACEA. Asaphus Canadensis, Chapman. oS platycephalus, Stokes. Calymene senaria, Conrad. Cheirurus pleurexanthemus, Green. Triarthrus Becki, Green. <¢ glaber, Billings. eh spinosus, Billings. Leperditia cylindrica, Hall. 2 @ She — seks wea Ate nya LEDA CLAY AND SAXICAVA SAND PLANTA. Fucus sp. Populus balsamifera, Linnzeus. ’ Potamogeton sp. Potentilla Canadensis, Linnzeus. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. Macoma fragilis, Fabricius. Mytilus edulis, Linneeus. Portlandia arctica, Gray. Saxicava rugosa, Linnezeus. 62 PIScEs. Cyclopterus lumpus, Linneeus. Mallotus villosus, Cuvier. CETACEA. Phoca Greenlandieca: ALLUVIUM (sHELL-MARL DEPOSIT.) GASTROPODA. Amnicola porata, Say. Conulus fulvus, Draparnaud. Hyalina arborea, Say. “ indentata, Say. Limnza desidiosa? Say. “« galbana, Binney. “« stagnalis, Linneus. Mesodon albolabris, Say. «+o war. dentifera, Binney. S Sayul, Binney. Patula alternata, Say. Physa heterostropha, Say. Planorbis bicarinatus, Say. a campanulatus, Say. o parvus, Say. Valvata tricarinata, Say. EDIBLE AND POISONOUS FUNGI. Pror. JoHN Macoun, M.A., F.L.S., F.R.8.C., Boranist. TO THE GEOLOGICAL AND Naturat History SurVEY OF CANADA. Read 31st January 1884. The title of my paper needs but little explanation, as I only apply it to those fungi which by common consent are admitted to be edible or suspicious or poisonous. These may be found in abundance in our woods and fields, or by our roadsides at various times during the summer. I may say with truth that Canadian fungi are almost unknown as regards their numbers, their value as food or their injurious effects on the human system. It is therefore with some diflidence that I approach a subject which to me is less familiar than any other branch of 63 the vegetable kingdom, and which possibly to you may have no interest whatever. For myself, I entered on their study at the suggestion of my chief, Dr. Selwyn, Director of the Geological and Natural History Survey, and now, when I stand only at the portal of the vast unex- plored region beyond, I ask your attention to a few of the facts already gleaned, and hope they may not be altogether without interest, and even profit. At present the greater number of systematic botanists recognize five great divisions or classes in the vegetable kingdom, of which the fifth or lowest is named thallogens or thallophytes, because organisms of this class instead of growing upright expand into a thallus consist- ing of parenchyma alone, and never exhibiting a marked distinction into root, stem and foliage. All plants of this class are flowerless. This class includes five orders, Viz. : LICHENS. Funai. ALGH. DEsMIDIACE#, single cells of a green colour, found in fresh water. DraTromMace&, single cells of brown colour, and having silicious cell walls, found in sea and fresh water. The plants in the first order, lichens, are never aquatic, but grow on bark of trees, earth or rock, and draw their nourishment from the air. Fungi, on the other hand, are parasitic, and live by appropriating the juices of living plants to their own use or the organized matter of dead and decaying animal or vegetable. Algze are almost strictly aquatic, the greater number of them being seaweeds. You will note that these three orders, although quite closely related, are kept apart by their special modes of obtaining nourishment, and that the fungi always use prepared food even if by so doing they destroy that which man has laid up for himself. Those species which produce rust, smut, mildew and many other plant diseases are parasitic and prey exclusively on living plants, while mushrooms (agarics) and puff-balls live on dead and decaying matter. As the purpose of this paper is not to give the classifications of the order, I sball pass at once to the section named the Agaricini, as it 64 is to this division that the greater number of the toadstools and mush- rooms of our woods and fields belong, and to these J will at once direct your attention. We mentioned that fungi had no flowers, and in this division as well as in all others they begin by the production of filamentous threads or attenuated cells which appear like the roots of the fungus which afterwards appears. These threads are called the mycelium, and are the true vegetation of the fungi. What are denominated fungi are therefore the fruit and not the whole plant, as many believe. Agarics or mushrooms are merely rounded tubercles which are formed on the mycelium below the surface. Some of these rapidly enlarge, burst through an outer covering (called the volva or wrapper), which is left at the base, thrust out a stalk or stipe bearing at its top a rounded body—the pileus, or cap. Underneath this cap are the lamelle or gills that occupy the whole lower surface, and which consist of a series of plates which bear over their whole surface naked sporules, which on examination under a microscope will be found grouped in fours. The drawing before you is that of the Fly Amanita (Amanita muscaria), one of the most beautiful and widely distributed as well as most dangerous and highly organized of our agarics. This species is commonly found in the depths of the forest, generally under firs or ‘pines, and in the months of June and July is a very conspicuous object in the northern woods. Last June it was a lovely sight in the woods of Nova Scotia near Annapolis. The specimen before you, with many others, was obtained in Rideau Hail woods by Mrs. Chamberlin, In the North of England and Scottish Highlands it is a most lovely object in the dark fir woods, and its crimson pileus when lighted up by a sun- beam falling aslant through the thick foliage is a sight never to be forgotten. In Northeastern Asia this species is a favourite drug to produce intoxication amongst the Russians and natives of Kamtschatka. The fungi are collected in the hottest month and hung up to dry. When taken to produce intoxication small pieces are rolled up and swallowed without chewing. Our next drawing is that of the edible mushroom (Agaricus campestris), which is so well known that its praises need not be ts 65 recited. There are numerous varieties of it in fields and gardens and ‘along our roadsides, but were its value as au article of food better known it would be extensively cultivated and largely take the place of meat on our tables, as it contains nearly as much nutrition, pound for pound, as our best beefsteak. At present only a few of its forms are gathered, and large quantities go to decay through ignorance of their value. The next figure is a life-like representation of the tall cylindrical agaric (Coprinus comatus), which is another common and esculent species. In the latter part of last September this species was a very prominent object on many lawns in the western part of the city, grow- ing in groups or singly, and often throwing up stems nearly a foot high. No one seemed to touch it, and bushels of them went to waste for want of collectors, This species is highly nutritions and quite as palatable as the mushroom, and is apparently better suited for catsup, as it contains a great deal of juice, and if allowed to become old soon melts away. In passing to decay, like all the genus (coprinus), it dis- solves into a black fluid. Rhind says: ‘If this be collected and boiled with a little water, and a few cloves added to prevent it getting mouldy in keeping, and passed through a filter, it furnishes an excellent bistre for painting.” * Numerous other species of agarics might be cited and dwelt upon, but time will not permit of anything but a passing notice, which I can best do by explaining these beautiful drawings furnished by “ our artist,” whom I am happy to see amongst us to-night. (A collection of water colour paintings by Mrs. Chamberlin was here exhibited.) Another section of this vast family is represented by the morel (Morchella esculenta), which differs from the agaric in having, in com- mon with all the lower forms of fungi, their whole interior, tuough often of a very large size, filled with a multitude of asci (elongated sacs), enclosing single or double sporules such as are found in lichens. This fact has caused some late writers to claim a closer connection be- tween fungi and lichens than I am able with my limited knowledge to perceive. 66 Our representative of the morel is before you, but those that are acquainted with the true species will observe that this form has an undulated, irregular, gvrose pileus, while the true species has an ovate pileus with firm ribs surrounding deep pits. In colour this species is browner, and as an article of food not so pleasant to the taste. This form is named Gyromitra esculenta, or the edible gyromitra, while the morel is named Morchella eseulenta, arly in spring this species may be found in some profusion in most woods in the vicinity of the city, and was particularly abundant in the woods at the back of Rideau Hall last May and June. Besides these, I have gathered two species ot helvella at Belleville, both of which are esculent. Closely related to these are the truffle family, which are of such economic importance in the South of Europe, but of which we have no representatives. There is still another section which claims more than a passing notice. I mean the puff-balls. These forms, which are included in the genus lycoperdon, are, according to Professor Peck, all esculent when gathered young and cooked before the spores turn yellow. One species, Lycoperdon giganteum, grows to an enormous size, and specimens are on record which were over three feet in diameter. Professor Peck men- tions one that was a little over eight feet in cireumference and weighed 47 lbs. He says it looked at a distance like a small boulder, and would make a meal for a good sized family. One writer recommends that when one of these large ones is found only a part of it should be taken —enough for a meal—and another part next day, and so on. In this. way one of them might serve a family for a week. It is said that when the growirg plant is wounded the wounds heal and are filled up with new tissue. Another species, the cup-shaped puff-ball, is very abundant on our ‘western prairies, forming great rings with the edible mushroom. In summer of 1879, wken exploring on the piains northwest of Qn’Ap- pelle, we came upon multitudes of this species, ranging in size from a man’s fist to his head, and the same species was gathered in thousands north of the Cyprus Hills and west of Strong Current Creek. Mush- rooms being in myriads, we did not eat many messes-of puff-balls, for when a man ate a mallard and about half a peck of mushrooms at a sitting he had quite sufficient for one meal. * * rr: * f 67 Mr. FiuercHer was surprised to hear that the fly agaric, as figured before the meeting, was identical with the European species, which, instead of having the pileus of a yellowish brown colour, has one of a most intense scarlet. He mentioned as a curious fact that in Italy, where fungi form a large portion of the food, the State Inspector of Fungi condemns the Agaricus campestris as unwholesome on account of the large number of edible species superior to it. Mrs. Trarit, of Lakefield, Ont., so long known in Canada as a writer on natural history, expressed her pleasure at having had an opportunity of attending the meeting, and had collected in Central Ontario many of the species depicted in the plates shown. LIST OF OTTAWA COLEOPTERA. W. Hacue Harrineron. Read 14th February, 1884. INTRODUCTION. Having by request of the Council prepared for publication a list of Ottawa Coleoptera, it is almost imperative that it should be introduced by a brief paper, showing under what conditions it appears. Although it should only be considered as preparatory to a more extended and perfect list, to be issued wlen a fuller knowledge of our fauna has been gained, it will serve as a basis on which to build in the future, and may, I hope, be found not without a present value. The difficulties enccuntercd in its preparation have been great, but the result brings with it a reward in that much necessary work has now been completed and that future progress will he the more readily made. -The classification followed in the list is that of Drs. LeConte and Horn, published last year by the Smithsonian Institute, and the arrangement of the families therefore differs from that of other Cana- dian lists. Under this classification the coleoptera of North America, are divided into eighty-three families, of which we have represented so e 68 far sixty-seven. The number of named species in my list is 926,* but more than 200 species are yet undetermined, so that the total num- ber of species which have been taken is about 1,150. Every possible precaution has been taken to guard against errors such as have unfortunately greatly lessened the value of some recent Canadian lists. A large proportion of my elateridz, buprestide, cerambycide and chrysomelide were named for me by the late Dr. LeConte, and I am indebted to Mr. John B. Smitht for abundant help in the determination of species in other families. Without the assist- ance so generously given by these gentlemen it would indeed have been impossible for me yet to prepare my list. The principal value of a local list, other than as a mere catalogue of a collection, is due to the information it affords as to the gecgraphical distribution of species. The consideration of this question must, how- ever, be postponed until it has received the careful attention it so richly deserves. Meanwhile I have made a rough general comparison of our fauna with such lists as I have in my possession, with a view to finding which groups are most fully, or most meagrely represented, and of gaining an idea as to the total number of species likely to occur here. Six lists have been used in this comparison. First, a list pub- lished by Mr. Pettit (Can. Ent., vols. II and II[), of 1,143 species taken at Grimsby, Ont. Second, a list by Messrs. Reinecke and Zesch of about 1,400 species captured in the vicinity of Buffalo. Third, a list published by Mr. Couper (Can. Sport. and Nat.) of 1,012 species recorded from the Province of Quebec. Fourth, a list by Messrs. Hubvard and Schwarz of 1,246 species recorded from the Lake Superior region. Fifth, a list by the same authors of 1,787 from the lower peninsula of Michigan. Sixth, one by Mr. Schwarz of 1,457 species captured in Florida. The three last were published in Vol. X VII of the Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, and were very kindly sent to me by Dr. LeConte only a few weeks before his lamented death. All these lists contain more species than that which I have pre- pared, but the reason in each case is not difficult to determine. Com- * Increased by further determinations to 1,003. } Now a corresponding member of the Club. 69 mencing with the Quebec list, it must be remembered that it is for the whole Province, and that it includes all species recorded therefrom. Nominally it contains 1,012 species, but many of the names are merely synonyms for, or varieties of, other species. The Lake Superior and Michigan lists include all species then known from these extensive dis- tricts, while that of Florida deals with a very large and varied country having a particularly rich flora and fauna. The only really local lists are those of Grimsby and Buffalo. I do not know how long Mr. Pettit collected at the former place, but from the extent of his list and from his reputation as a coleopterist it is probable that he was working for many years. The Buffalo list is the result, as stated by the authors, of the labour of seventeen years, during which period all their leisure hours were exclusively devoted to the accumulation and study of the _ Species occurring in their vicinity. Our Ottawa coleoptera have (with the exception of a few species secured at Club excursions) been collected within a radius of ten or twelve miles, and nearly all the species have been taken since the for- mation of the Club, or within the past six years. I am indebted to Mr. James Fletcher for a number of species, and to Mr. A. W. Hanham, a former member, for several, while a few specimens have been received from other members. The few families to which special attention has been given in col- lecting are found by comparison with the above lists to be very well represented, but in many families the number of species is very small. Carabide, for instance, are represented in the Grimsby list by 156 species, Lake Superior 202, Michigan 204 and Buffalo 186, while we have as yet only 114. Again, the water-beetles—dytiscide, gyrinide and hydrophilide—are: Grimsby 80 species, Lake Superior 119, Michigan 104, Buffalo 77 and Ottawa only 65. As water beetles are apparently as numerous in these latitudes as. they are farther south (the Florida list gives only 60 or 65 species), we should have very many more species on our list. If 119 species occur at Lake Superior, the fauna of which most closely resembles ours, there seems to be no reason why our list should rot contain at least 100, when our rivers, lakes and other waters are examined with any degree of care. 70 Many other large groups have also been almost entirely neglected, and will yield, when properly investigated, many additional species. If there were a few more collectors the different localities could be properly examined, and the list of Ottawa species carried within a year or two to probably fifteen hundred, and eventually to fully two thousand. Until more of my species are determined it would be almost useless to make any general comparison of our fauna with that of other districts, but I have tabulated three families in which the species are fully determined, with the following results. Of elateride we have more species than are enumerated in any of the previously mentioned lists, with the exception of the Quebec one, which has an equal number, viz., 89. The others have respectively, Grimsby 77, Lake Superior 82, Michigan 80, Buffalo 74, and Florida 52. Of the latter species only nine, or seventeen per cent., have occurred here. Three of these ( Alaus occulatus, A. myops and Melanotus communis) are common to all the lists, while one (fornax badius) is unrecorded in any of the others. Of Grimsby species we have 51, Lake Superior 51, Michigan 48, Buffalo 48, and Quebec 58, or sixty-five per cent. That our fauna is essentially a northern one is shown not only by the absence of the Florida species, but from the fact that of 40 species contained in a list of Green Mountain coleoptera (R. Hayward and H. Savage, Quart. Journal Boston Zodlogical Soc.) we have 29, cr seventy-five per cent. In buprestidz the species enumerated are as follows: Ottawa 37, Grimsby 35, Lake Superior 30, Michigan (which alone exceeds Ottawa) 38, Quebec 28, Buffalo 34, and Florida 29. From the Green Moun: tains seven species are given, of which we have all. Of the species from the former localities we have from sixty to sixty-five per cent., ex- cept of the Florida species, only seven of which, or about twenty-four per cent., occur here. Of these seven species two are the common injurious insects known as the apple tree borer (Chrysobothris femorata) | and the raspberry borer (Agrilus ruficollis ). Of cerambycidz there are in the Ottawa list 106 species, Grimsby 103, Lake Superior 78, Michigan 86, Buffalo 138, Quebee 111, and Florida 76. We have 60 per cent. of Buffalo species, 63 per cent. of Grimsby, 65 per cent. of Quebec, 68 per cent. of Michigan, and 73 per — “i cent. of Lake Superior, but only 13 per cent. or ten species of the Florida list. Of 32 Green Mountain species we have 24, or seventy- five per cent. Only two species are common to all the lists, viz., A ylotrechus colonus and Urographis fasciatus. Adding together the three families we have just considered, the totals are: Ottawa 231 species, Florida 157, Lake Superior 190, Michigan 204, Grimsby 215, Quebec 228, and Buffalo 246, or fifteen more than Ottawa. This comparison clearly shows that, were all the other families fully worked up, our collections would be very largely increased. Although my list contains many species not previously recorded from Canada, it is yet doubtful whether any species new to science have been captured. When Dr. LeConte was here last summer he took home with him a box of rare species and afterward sent mea partial list in which three new speciest were indicated. Unfortunately these species, as well as the unnamed remainder, have been probably sorted into his vast collections, and are thas lost to us, although luckily not lost to science. There are many rare and interesting species worthy of special mention, but for want of time such consideration must be deferred. Species, one hundred and ten in number, marked with an asterisk (*), have apparently not been previously included in lists of Canadian coleoptera. OTTAWA COLEOPTERA. ee - Gytc . CICINDELIDE, Calosoma frigidum, Kirby. Cicindela longilabris, Say. calidum, Fabr. x . . . sim ' 6-guttata, Fab. ElaphrusClairvillei, Kirby. purpurea, Oliv. cicatricosus, Lec. var. limbalis, K1. ruscarius, Say. vulgaris, Say. Blethisa quadricollis, Hald. 12-guttata, De}. Dyschirius nigripes, Lec. repanda, Dej. globulosus, Say. hispidus, Lec.* CARABID. ay Omophron americanum, De). Clivina americana, De). Cychrus Lecontei, De). Nomius pygmeus, De}. - + Dr. Horn has since determined one of these to be Malachius Ulkei, Horn. Bembidium inzequale, Say. nitidum, Kirby. americanum, Dej. nigrum, Say. planum, Hald. bimaculatum, Kirby. rupestre, De}. dorsale, Say. intermedius, Kirby. pictum, Lec. 4-maculatum, Linn. several unnamed species. Tachys flavicauda, Say. nanus, Gyll. incurvus, Say. sp. Patrobus longicornis, Say. Pterostichus adoxus, Say. dilligendus Chd.* coracinus Newm. stygicus, Say. lucublandus, Say. luctuosus, De}. corvinus, Dej. mutus, Say. orinomum, Leach. erythopus, De}. femoralis, Kirby. mandibulazis, Kirby. Lophoglossus serutator, Lec. Amara avida, Say. exarata, Dej.* angustata, Say. ‘ impuncticolis, Say. polita, Lec.* obesa, Say. Diplochila impressicollis, Dej. Badister notatus, Hald. pulchellus, Lee. Calathus gregarius, Say. impunctata, Say. Platynus sinuatus, De}. extensicollis, Say. decorus, Say. anchomenoides, Rand. melanarius, Dej. propinquus, Gemm.,* ~) bo cupripennis, Say. var. nitidulum, De}. excavatus, Dej. picticornis, Newm. ruficornis, Lec. lutulentus, Lec. 8-punctatus, Fabr. placidus, Say. obsoletus, Say. quadripunctatus, Dej. Olisthopus micans, Lec. Anchus pusillus, Lee. Lebia grandis, Hentz. tricolor, Say. viridis, Say. pumila, Dej. ornata, Say. furcata, Lec. Metabletus americanus, Dej. Callida punctata, Lec. Cymindis pilosa, Say. borealis, Lec.* Brachynus americanus, Lec. perplexus, Dej. medius, Harris. alternans, De}. fumans, Fabr. Chleenius tomentosus, Say. niger, Rand. impunctifrons, Say. tricolor, Dej, solitarius, Say. sericeus, Forst. Anomoglossus emarginatus, Say. Brachylobus lithophilus, Say. Agonoderus pallipes, Fabr. partiarius, Say. Harpalus erraticus, Say. viridizneus, Beauy. caliginosus, Fabr. pennsylvanicus, De}. herbivagus, Say. laticeps, Lec. basilaris, Kirby. Stenolophus conjunctus, Say, dissimilis, Dej. ochropezus, Say. carus, Lec. Bradycellus vulpeculus, Say. ruprestris, Say. Anisodactylus rusticus, De). nigrita, Dej. discoideus, De}. baltimorensis, Say. (Xestonotus) lugubris, De). (Amphasia) interstitialis, Say. (Spongopus) verticalis, Lec. HALIPLID&. Haliplus triopsis, Say. ruficollis, Dej. Cnemidotus 12-punctatus, Say. DLDYtTIScID®. Laccophilus maculosus, Germ, Hydroporus, inequalis, Fabr. hybridus, Aubé.* affinis, Say. rotundatus, Lec. consimilis, Lec. spurius, Lec. modestus, Aubé dichrous, Mels.* americanus, Aubé?* signatus, Mannh. tristis, Payk. notabilis, Sharp.* sp. near persimilis, Cr. three unnamed species. Coptotomus interrogatus, Fabr. ybiosoma bifarius, Kirby. Agabus, sp. aeneolus, Cr. stagninus, Say. punctulatus, Aubé, Rhantus binotatus, Harris. Colymbetes sculptilis, Harris. longulus, Lec. Dytiscus Harrisii, Kirby. fasciventris, Say. Cordieri, Aubé. Acilius fraternus, Harris. - GYRINID&. Dineutes assimilis, Aubé. Gyrinus borealis, Aube. two unnamed species. HYDROPHILD#. Helophorus lacustris, Lec. obscurus, Lec. vai.* lineatus, Say. tuberculatus, Gyll. Hydrochus rufipes, Mels.* Hydraena pennsylvanica, Kiesw. Hydiophilus glaber, Hb. Ochthebius sp. Hydrocharis obtusatus, Say. Berosus striatus, Say. Philhydrus cinctus, Say. diffusus, Lec. perplexus, Lee. sp. Hydrocombus lacustris, Lec. rotundatus, Say. Hydrobius fuscipes, Linn. feminalis, Lec.* subcupreus, Say. Cercyon preetextatum, Say. pygmeeum, II1.* unipunctatum, Linn. several unnamed species. Cryptopleurum vagans, Lec. SILPHIDA. Necrophorus pustulata, Hersch. orbicollis, Say. tomentosa, Web. Silpha surinawensis, Fab. lapponica, Hb. noveboracensis, Forst, ineequalis, Fab. americana, Linn. Choleva terminans, Lec. Prionocheeta opaca, Lec. Hydnobius, substriatus, Lec.* Anisotoma punctostriatus, Kirby. Liodes globosa, Lec. geminata, Horn.* sp. Agathidium oniscoides, Beauv. revolvens, Lec. sp. ScyDM£NIDA. Scydmeenus fossiger, Lec. basilis, Lee. fatuus, Lec. n. sp. PSELAPHID®. Ctenistes piceus, Lec. Tyrus humeralis, Aubé. .Pselaphus Erichsonii, Lec. Tychus longipalpus, Lec. Bryaxis conjuncta, Lee. Brendelii, Horn.* puncticollis, Lee.* propingua, Lee. rubicunda, Aubé. tomentosa, Lec.* Decarthron abnorme, Lec. formiceti, Lec. Batrisus globosus, Lec. STAPHYLINIDA. Falagria venustula, Er. Homaualota lividipennis, Mann. sp. Tachyusa, species unnamed. Aleochara lata, Grav. “ gracilicornis, Fauvel, MSS. * Oxypoda tenebrosa, Fauvel. sp. Gyrophena corruscula, Er.* Quedius molochinus, Gray. sp. Listotrophus cingulatus, Grav. Creophilus maxillosus, Linn. Staphilinus vulpiaus, Nordm. cinnamopterus Grav. violaceus, Grav. cxesareus, Cederh. 74 Ocypus ater, Grav. Philonthus cyanipennis, Fabr. aeneus, Rossi. niger, Mels.* debilis, Grav. palliatus, Grav. micans, Grav. brunneus, Grav. leetulus, Say.* agilis (?)* quadricollis, Fauvel MSS. varicolor, Boh. Xantholinus cephalus, Say. hamatus, Say. Diochus Schaumii, Kraatz. Dianous ccerulescens, Gyll.* Stenus juno, Fabr. flavicornis, Er. several unnamed species. Euestethus americanus, Er. Cryptobium bicolor, Grav. pallipes, Grav. Lathrobium grande, Lee. eollare, Er. rubripenne, Fauvel.* Stilicus sp. Lithocaris confluens, Say. Peederus littorarius, Er. Sunius longiusculus, Mann. Tachinus luridus, Er. flavipennis, Dej. Tachyporus jocosus, Say. brunneus, Fabr. Erchomus ventriculus, Er. Conosoma crassum, Gray. basale, Er. Bolitobius niger, Grav. cinctus Grav. intrusus, Horn. sp. Bryoporus rufescens, Lee. cribratus Fauvel.* Mycetoporus lepidus, Grav.* americanus, Er. Oxyporus rufipennis, Lec. femoralis, Grav. Bledius semiferrugineus, Lee. Trogophlens nitellus, Fauvel.* Geodromicus nigrita, Mull.* Homalium sp. Anthobium sp. Micropeptus tesserula, Curt. TRICHOPTERYGID. Ptenidium evanescens, Msh.* Nephanes Jeviusculus, Matth.* Trichopteryx sp. SCAPHIDIID®. Scaphidium 4-guttatum, Say. Scaphisoma convexum, Say. Taxidium gammaroides, Jee. PHALACRIDA. Phalacrus politus, Mels. Olibrus consimilis, Msh. sp. CoRYLOPHID. Sacium lugubre, Lec. sp. Corylophus marginicollis, Lec. CoccINELLID&. Megilla maculata, DeG. Hippodamia 5-signata, Kirby. convergens, Gueér. 13-punctata, Linn. parenthesis, Say. Coccinella trifasciata, Linn. 9-notata, Herbst. 5-notata, Kirby. monticola, Muls. sanguinea, Linn. Adalia frigida, Schn. vipunctata, Linn. Harmonia picta, Rand. Anatis 15-punctata, Oliv. Psyllobora 20-maculata, Say. Chilocorus bivulnerus, Muls. (i Brachyacantha ursina, Fabr. var. 10-pustulata, Mels. Hyperaspis signata, Oliv. proba, Say. bigeminata, Rand.* undulata, Say. Scymnus fraternus, Lec. ?* he morrhous, Lec. punctatus, Mels. sp. ENDOMYCHID. Lycoperdina ferruginea, Lec. Mycetina perpulchra, Newm. vittata, Fabr. Endomychus biguttatus, Say. EROTYLID®. Languria gracilis, Newm, var. Dacne 4-maculata, Say. Megalodacne heros, Say. Mycotretus pulchra, Say. sanguinipennis, Say. Triplax thoracica, Say. CoLYDIID. Synchita fuliginosa, Mels. Cicones marginalis, Mels. Ditoma quadriguttata, Say. Cerylon castaneum, Say. Philothermus glabriculus, Lec. CucusID. Silvanus planatus, Germ. bidentatus, Fabr. Catogenus rufus, Fabr. Cucujus clavipes, Fabr. Pediacus fuseus, Er. Lezmophleus bigattatus, Say. conyexulus, Lec.* Dendrophagus glaber, Lec. Brontes dubius, Fabr. CRYPTOPHAGID. Telmatophilus americanus, Lec. Antherophagus ochraceus, Lec. convexulus, Lec. Paramecosoma serrata, Gyll. Cryptophagus, sp. Atomaria ephippiata, Zimm. several unnamed species. MYcETOPHAGID2. Mycetophagus punctatus, Say. flexuosus, Say. bipustulatus, Mels. pluripunctatus, Lec. obsoletus Mels. sp. Triphyllus humeralis, Kirby. Litargus tetraspilotus,. Lec. Typhcea fumata, Linn. DERMESTID®. Byturus unicolor, Say. Dermestes nubilus, Say. lardarius, Linn. bicolor, Fabr.* Attagenus megatoma, Fabr. Anthrenus varius, Fabr. muszeorum, Linn. Cryptorhopalum ruficorne.* Orphilus ater, Er. glabratus, Er.* var. HISTERID&. Hister Harrisii, Kirby. interruptus, Beauv. | abbreviatus, Fabr. defectus, Lec.* 16-striatus, Say. americanus, Payk. exaratus, Lec.* carolinus, Payk. Lecontei, Mars. parallelus, Say. coarctatus, Lee. 76 cylindricus, Payk. sp. Saprinus fraternus, Say. Teretrius americanus, Lee.. NITIDULID#. Brachypterus urtice, Fabr. Carpophilus niger, Say. brachypterus, Say. Colastus truncatus, Rand. Epurea estiva, Linn. rufa, Say. truncatella, Mann. sp. Nitidula bipustulata, Fabr. rufipes, Linn. ziczac, Say. Phenolia grossa, Fabr. Omosita colon, Linn. Tps fasciatus, Oliv. var. 4-signatus, Say. sanguinolentus, Oliv. confluens, Say. vittata, Say. Rhizophagus remotus, Lec. TROGOSITID. Trogosita mauritanica, Linn. dubia, Horn. sp. Peltis ferruginea, Linn. Calitys scabra, Thunb. Grynocharis 4-lineata, Mels. Thymalus fulgidus, Er. LATHRIDIID. Stephostethus liratus, Lec. Lathridius, species unnamed. Corticaria pumilus, Mels. species unnamed. BYRRHID®. Clytilus varius, Fabr. Byrrhus americanus, Lec. Pettitii, Horn. Syncalypta echinata, Lec.* Limnichus punctatus, Lec. PARNIDA. Psephenus Lecontei, Hald. Stenelmis vittipennis, Zimm.* HETEROCERID. Heterocerus mollinus, Kies. two unnamed species. DASCYLLIDE. Ectopria nervosa, Mels. var. thoracica, Zieg). Prionocyphon discoideus, Say. Scirtes orbiculatus, Fabr.* tibialis, Guér. Cyphon collaris, Guér.* ruficollis, Say. variabilis, Thunb. obscurus, Guér. ELATERID®. Tharops obliquus, Say. Deltometopus amoenicornus, Say. Dromeeolus cylindricollis, Say. Fornax badius, Mels.* Hornii, Bv.* orchesides, Newm. Microrhagus imperfectus, Lec. pectinatus, Lec. triangularis, Say. Hypoceelus frontosus, Say.* Epiphanis cornutus, Esch. Sarpedon scabrosus, By.* Adolocera avita, Say. aurorata, Say. obtecta, Say. brevicornis, Lec. Alans occulatus, Linn. myops, Fabr. Cardiophorus amictus, Mels. 17 convexulus, Lee. Cryptobypnus abbreviatus, Say pectoralis, Say. Elater nigricollis, Germ. linteus, Say. discoideus, Fabr. semicinctus, Rand. vitiosus, Lec. apicatus, Say. luctuosus, Lec. impolitus, Mels. nigricans, Germ. var. pedalis, Germ. var. fuscatus, Mels. nigrinus, Payk.* pullus, Germ. mixtus, Hbst. miniipennis, Lec. sanguinipennis, Germ. rubicus, Say. obliquus, Say. protervus, Lec. Drasterivs dorsalis, Say. Megapenthes stigmosus, Lee. Ludius abruptus, Say. Agriotes mancus, Say. fucosus, Lec. . stabilis, Lec. limosus, Lec. oblongicollis, Mels.* Dolopius lateralis, Esch. Betarmon bigeminatus, Rand. Melanotus decumanus, Er. scrobicollis, Lec. ? fissilis, Say. communis, Gyll. parumpunctatus, Mels. Limonius confusus, Lec. aeger, Lec.* sp. aurifer, Lee. Campylus denticornis, Kirby. Pityobius anguinus, Lec. Athous Brightwelli, Kirby. acanthus, Say. cucullatus, Say. rufifrons, Rand. discalceatus, Lec. Sericosomus fusiformis, Lec. incongruus, Lec. viridanus, Say. Corymbites virens, Schr. vernalis, Hentz. tesselatus, Linn. resplendens, Esch. cylindriformis, Hbst. spinosus, Lec. tarsalis, Mels. sulcicollis, Say. fallax, Say.* medianus, Germ. sulcatus (1) triundulatus, Rand. hamatus, Say. hieroglyphicus, Say. cruciatus, Linn. aeripennis, Kirby. splendens, Ziegl. inflatus, Say. Oxygonus obesus, Say. Asaphes memnonius, Hbst. var. brevicollis, Lec. decoloratus, Say, var. aereus, Mels. THROSCIDA. Throscus constrictor, Say. alienus, Bonv. BuPRESTID. Chaleophora virginiensis, Dr. liberta, Germ. fortis, Lec. Dicerca prolongata, Lee. divaricata, Say. a lurida, Fabr. tenebrosa, Kirby. chrysea, Mels. lugubris, Lee. Poecilonota cyanipes, Say. Buprestis fasciata, Fabr. var. sexplagiata, Lec. 78 consularis, Gory. maculiventris, Say. striata, Fabr. Melanophila longipes, Say. fulvoguttata, Harris. Anthaxia viridicornis, Say. viridifrons, Gory. inornata, Rand. Chrysobothris femorata, Fabr. trinervia, Kirby. dentipes, Germ. pusilla, Lap.* floricola, Gory.* sexsignata, Say. Harrisii, Hentz. Agrilus ruficollis, Fabr. fulgens, Lec. otiosus, Say. bilineatus, Web. interruptus, Lec. torpidus, Lec. politus, Say. egenus, (Gory. putillus, Say.* sp.* (a) Brachys erosa, Mels. LAMPYRID. Calopteron reticulatum, Fabr. . var. apicale, Lec. Celetes basalis, Lec. Lopheros fraternus, Rand. Eros thoracicus, Rand. coccinatus, Say. humeralis, Fabr. Plateros modestus, Say. caniculatus, Say. Calochromus perfacetus, Say. Lucidota atra, Fakr. Ellychnia corrusca, Fabr. Pyropyga nigricans, Say. Pyractomena borealis, Rand. Photinus ardens, Lec. (a) Unknown to Dr. LeConte and not in Dr. Horn’s collection. . Photuris peunsylvanica, DeG. Podabrus nothoides, Lec. (?)* tiicostatus, Say. rugosulus, Lec. diadema, Fabr. modestus, Say. punctatus, Lec. Telephorus carolinus, Fabr. scitulus, Say. rotundicollis, Say. tuberculatus, Lec. _bilineatus, Say. Silis percomis, Say. Malthinus occipitalis, Lec. var. difficilis, Lec. MALACHIDA. Collops vittatus, Say. tricolor, Say. Malachius Ulkei, Horn.* Anthocomus Erichsoni, Lec. flavilabris, Say ? Attalus morulus, Lec. CLERID. Cymatodera inornata, Say. Trichodes Nuttali, Kirby. Clerus nigripes, Say. thoracicus, Oliv. Thanasimus trifasciatus, Say. dubius, Fabr. var. rubriventris, Lec. Thaneroclerus sanguineus, Say. Hydnocera humeralis, Say. var. difficilis, Lec. pallipennis, Say. verticalis, Say. Chariessa pilosa, Forst. Laricobius rubidns, Lec. Corynetes violaceus, Linn. PriniID#. Ptinus fur, Linn. Eucrada humeralis, Mels. 19 Oligomerus sericans, Mels. Hadrobregmus carinatus, Say. foveatus, Kirby. Anobium notatum, Say. Trypopitys sericeus, Say. Xyletinus fucatus, Lec. Hemiptychus punctatus, Lec.* Ceenocara oculata, Say. Ptilinus thoracicus, Rand. Endecatomus rugosus, Rand. Bostrychus bicornis, Web. Dinoderus porcatus, Lec. substriatus, Payk. punctatus, Say.* CuPESID&. Cupes concolor, Westw. CIOID#. Rhipidandrus parodoxus, Beauv. Cis, species unnamed. SPHINDID#. Sphindus americanus, Say. LUCANID. Dorcus parallelus, Lee. Platycerus quercus, Weber. depressus, Lec. Ceruchus piceus, Weber. ScARABZIDA. Onthophagus Hecate, Panz. Atenius gracilis, Mels. Dialytes striatulus, Say. Aphodius fossor, Linn. hyperboreus, Lec.* fimetarius, Linn. granarius, inn. ruricola, Mels. vittatus, Say. inquinatus, Fabr. bicolor, Say. ‘Odontaeus cornigerus, Mels. Geotrupes Egeriei, Germ. Blackburnii, Fabr. Trox porcatus, Say. aequalis, Say. scaber, Linn. Hoplia trifasciata, Say. Dichelonycha elongatula, Sch6n, subvittata, Lec. testacea, Kirby. canadensis, Horn. (?) albicollis, Burm. Serica sericea, I]. vespertina, Schon. Diplotaxis sordida, Say. tristis, Kirby. Lachnosterna fusca, Fréhl. two unnamed species. Ligyrus relictus, Say. Xyloryctes satyrus, Fabr. Osmoderma eremicola, Knoch. seabra, Beauv. Trichins affinis, Gory. SPONDYLID®. Parandra brunnea, Fabr. CERAMBYCID#. Orthosoma brunneum, Forst. Tragasoma Harrisii, Lec. Asemum moestum, Hald. ‘Criocephalus agrestis, Kirby. Tetropium cinnamopterum, Kirby. Gonocallus collaris, Kirby. Dularius brevilineus, Say. Hylotrupes ligneus, Fab. Phymatodes dimidiatus, Kirby. thoracicus, Muls.* Merium proteus, Kirby. Callidium janthinum, Lec. antennatum, Newm. aereum, Newm.* Elaphidion villosum, Fabr. parallelum, Newm. 80 incertum, Newm. Obrium rubrum, Newm. Callimoxys sanguinicoliis, Oliv. Molorchus bimaculatus, Say. Purpuricenis humeralis, Fabr. Cyllene robiniae, Forst. Plagionotus speciosus, Say. Calloides nobilis, Harr. Arhopalus fulminans, Fabr. Xylotrechus colonus, Fab. sagittatus, Germ. undulatus, Say. Neoclytus capraea, Say. muricatulus, Kirby. erythocephalus, Fabr. Clytanthus ruricola, Oliv. Microclytus gazellula, Hald.* Cyrtophorus verrucosus, Oliv. Euderces picipes, Fabr. Atimia confusa, Say. Desmocerus palliatus, Forst. Rhagium lineatum, Oliv. Centrodera decolorata, Harr. Toxotus Schaumii, Lec. vitsiger, Rand. Pachyta monticola, Rand. Anthophilax attenuatus, Hald. Acmaeops proteus, Kirby. pratensis, Laich. Gaurotes cyanipennis, Say. Bellamira scalaris, Say. Typocerus velutinus, Oliv. Leptura plebeja, Rand. subhamata, Rand. abdominalis, Hald. (?)* (b) capitata, Newm. zebra, Oliv. saucia, Lec.* sphaericollis, Say. 6-maculata, Lec. nigrella, Say. canadensis, Oliv. chrysocoma, Kirby. proxima, Say. (b) Specimen retained by Dr. LeConte as “doubtful.” vittata, Oliv. mutabilis, Newm. pubera, Say. Psenocerus supernotatus, Say. Monohammus maculosus, Hald.* scutellatus, Say. confusor, Kirby. marmoratus, Rand. Dorcaschema nigrum, Say. Goes pulverulentus, Hald.* occulatus, Lec. Acanthoderes decipiens, Hald. Leptostylus aculifer, Say. parvus, Lec.* commixtus, Hald. macula, Say. Liopus variegatus, Hald. alpha, Say. punctatus, Hald.* cinereus, Lec. Lepturges symmetricus, Hald. signatus, Lec. querci, Fitch. facetus, Say. Hyperplatys aspersus, Say. maculatus, Hald. Urographis fasciatus, DeG. Acanthocinus obsoletus, Oliv. Hoplosia nubila, Lec. Pogonocherus penicellatus, Lec. mixtus, Hald. Hupogonius tomentosus, Hald. vestitus, Say. subarmatus, Lec. Saperda calcarata, Say. mutica, Say.* candida, Fabr. vestita, Say. discoidea, Fabr. tridentata, Oliv. lateralis, Fabr. moesta, Lec. concolor, Lec. Oberea amabilis, Hald. bimaculata, Oliv. Tetraopes tetraophthalmus, Forst. 81 CHRYSOMELID&. Donacia lucida, Lac. proxima, Kirby. subtilis, Kunze. var. fulgens, Lec. pubescens, Lec.* emarginata, Kirby. cuprea, Kirby, var. auryfera, Lec. jucunda, Lec.* flavipes, Kirby. acqualis, Kirby. sp. Heemonia nigricornis, Kirby. Orsodacna Childreni, Kirby. Zeugophora abnormis, Lec.* Syneta ferruginea, Germ. Lema trilineata, Oliv. Anomeea laticlavia, Forst. Chlamys plicata, Fabr. var. polycocca, Lec. Cryptocephalus mammifer, Newm. var. sellatus, Suffr. var. pretiosus, Mels. var. luteipennis, Mels. badius, Suffr.* 4-aculatus, Say. Schreibersii, Suffr. Pachybrachys viduatus, Fab, femoratus, Oliv.* tridens, Mels. litigiosus, Suffr. var. Diachus auratus, Fabr. catarius, Suffr. Monachus saponatus, Fabr. Xanthonia 10-notata, Say. villosula, Mels. Adoxis vitis, Linn, Glyptoscelis pubescens, Fabr. Chrysochus auratus, Fabr. Tymnes tricolor, Fab. Paria aterrima, Oliy. 6-notata, Say. var. 4-notata, Say. Graphops pubescens, Mels. Colaspis puncticollis, Say. Prasocuris Phellandru, Il. varipes, Lee. Doryphora clivicollis, Kirby. 10-lineata, Say. Chrysomela elegans, Oliv. multiguttis, Stal. var. labyrinthica, Lee. philadelphica, Linn. var. spiree, Say. multipunctata, Say. var. Bigsbyana, Kirby. Plagiodera lapponica, Linn. viridis, Meis. Phylicdecta vulgatissima, Sinn. Phylobrotica decorata, Say. discoidea, Fabr. Diabrotica 12-punctata, Fabr. vittata, Fabr. Trirhabda canadensis, Kirby. Galeruca 6-vittata, Lec.* rufosanguinea, Say. decora, Say. sp. near decora. sagittarie, Kirby. Oedionychis vians, Ill. quercus, Fabr. Disonycha limbicollis, Lec. alternata, Il. caroliniana, Fabr.* glabrata, Fabr. triangularis, Say. collaris, Fabr. Haltica bimarginata, Say. chalybea, Iil. ignita, Ill. Crepidodera helxines, Linn. cucumeris, Harr. Orthaltica copalina, Fabr. Systena hudsonias, Forst. frontalis, Fabr. marginalis, Il. Longitarsus testaceus, Lec. sp. Phyllotreta vittata, Fabr. Dibolia aerea, Mels. Psyllhiodes punctulata, Mels. Odontota rubra, Web. nervosa, Panz. sp. (1) Chelymorpha argus, Licht. Coptocycla aurichalcea, Fabr. _ guttata, Oliv. BRUCHID. Bruchus pisi, Linn. cruentatus, Horn.* sp. 'TENEBRIONID A. Phellopsis obcordata, Kirby. Nyctobates pennsylvanica, DeG. Ipthimus opacus, Lec. serratus, Mann. Upis ceramboides, Linn. Haplandrus concolor, Lee. Xylopinus saperdioides, Oliv. Tenebrio molitor, Linn. tenebrioides, Beauv. castaneus, Knoch. (?) Blapstinus interruptus, Say. Tribolium ferrugineum, Fabr. madens, Charp. Paratenetus punctatus, Sol. two unnanied species. Diaperis hydni, Fabr. - Hoplocephala bicornis, Oliv. Platydema excavatum, Say. flavipes, Fabr. ' americanum, Lap. Scaphidema aeneolum, Lec. Hypophloeus parallelus, Mels, Boletotherus bifureus, Fabr.. Boletophagus corticola, Say. depressus, Rand. Strongylium terminatum.* CISTELID. Allecula nigrans, Mels. Hymenorus pilosus, Mels. niger, Mels. Cistela brevis, Say. nts sericea, Say. Isomira 4-striata, Coup. Mycetochares bicolor, Coup. binotata, Say. three unnamed species. Capnochroa fuliginosa, Mels. Androchirus fuscipes, Mels. LAGRIID#&. Arthomacra aenea, Say. MELANDRYID. Tetratoma truncorum, Lec. Penthe obliquata, Fabr. pimelia, Fabr. Synchroa punctata, Newm. Melandrya striata, Say. Emmesa labiata, Say. Phryganophilus collaris, Lec. Xylita laevigata, Hellen. Zilora hispida, Lec. Enchodes sericea, Hald. Serropalpus striatus, Hellen. Hypulus simulator, Newm. n. sp. Scotochroa basalis, Lec.* Dircea liturata, Lec. Symphora flavicollis, Hald- rugosa, Hald. Eustrophus bicolor, Fab. bifasciatus, Say. tomentosus, Say. sp. Hallomenus scapularis, Mels. Orchesia castanea, Mels. gracilis, Mels. Canifa pallipes, Mels. Stenotrachelus arctatus, Say. Mycterus scaber, Hald. PYTHIDA. Crymodes discicollis, Lec. Boros unicolor, Say. Pytho niger, Kirby. 8 83 americanus, Kirby. Salpingus virescens, Lec. Sp. OEDEMERID®. Ditylus cceruleus, Rand. Asclera ruficollis, Say. .puncticollis, Say. CEPHALOIDA. Cephaloon lepturides. MOoORDELLID&. Anaspis flavipennis, Hald. rufa, Say. Tomoxia bidenta, Say. Mordella borealis, Lec. melaena, Lec. scutellaris, Fabr. marginata, Mels. irrorata, Lec.* Mordellistena trifasciata, Say. limbalis, Mels. scapularis, Say. aspersa, Mels.* comata, Lec.* pectoralis, Lec.* fuscipennis, Mels. ambusta, Lee var.* ANTHICID. Corphyra Newmani, Lec. lugubris, Say. fulvipes, Newm. terminalis, Say.* Notoxus anchora, Hentz. sp. Xylophilus fasciatus, Mels. basalis, Lee. two unnamed species. Anthicus formicarius, Laf. fulvipes, Laf.* cinctus, Say.* thoracicus Laf.* two unnamed species. PyRocHROID. Pyrochroa flabellata, Fabr. femoralis, Lee. Schizotus cervicalis, Newm. Dendroides canadensis, Latr. concolor, Newm. MELOID. Meloe angusticollis, Say. americanus, Leach. n. sp.2 Macrobasis unicolor, Kirby. RAIPIPHORID#. Pelecotoma flavipes, Mels. RHINOMACERID#. Rhinonacer pilosus, Lec. RHYNCHITID&. Rhynchites cyanellus, Lec. zratus, Say.* . ATTELABID. Attelabus rhois, Boh. OTIORHYNCHID#. Phyxelis rigidus, Say. Otiorhynchus ligneus, Oliv. Scythropus elegans, Coup. CURCULIONID&. Sitones flavescens, Marsh. Trichalophus alternatus, Say. Ithycerus noveboracensis, Forst. Apion herculaneum, Smith.* Walshii Smith.* segnipes, Say.* several unnamed species. Phytonomus nigrirostris, Fabr. (0/6) 1 Listronotus caudatus, Say. Maerops solutus, Boh. several unnamed species. Pissodes strobi, Peck. affinis, Rand. Hylobius pales, Hbst. var. stupidus, Boh. Dorytomus mucidus, Say. longulus, Lec.* Grypidius equiseti, Fabr.* Procas picipes, Steph.* Tanysphyrus, lemne, Fabr. Anchodemus angustatus, Lec.* Otidocephalus Chevrolatii, Horn.* Magdalis barbita, Say. olyra, Hbst. inconspicua, Horn. armicollis, Say. Anthonomus quadrigibbus, Say. signatus, Say. rubidus, Say. sues Lec. musculus, Say. sp. near disjunctus, Lec. Orchestes niger, Horn. * subhirtus, Horn.* Elleschus ephippiata, Say. bipunctatus, Linn.* Gymnetron teter, Fabr. Conotrachelus nenuphar, Hbst. posticatus, Boh. Pseudomus truncatus, Lec.* Tyloderma zereum, Say. Cryptorhynchus obliquefasciatus, Boh. Acoptus suturalis, Lec.* Mononychus vulpeculus, Fabr. Ceutorhynchus dicipiens, Lec.* Coelogaster cretura, Hbst. Madarus undulatus, Say. Stethobaris tubulatus, Say.* Balaninus rectus, Say. nasicus, Say. BRENTHIDA. Eupsalis minuta, Drury. CALANDRID&. Spenophorus pertinax, Oliv. sculptilis, Uhler. Dryopthorus corticalis, Say. Cossonus platalea, Say. Rhyncholus oregonensis, Horn.* Stenoscelis brevis, Boh. + ScOLYTID. Pityophthorus materiarius, Fitch. puberulus, Lec. sparsus, Lec. * Xyloterus retusus, Lec. bivittatus, Hb. Xyleborus czelatus, Eich. Tomicus calligraphus, Germ. pini, Say. Hylesinus opaculus, Lec. Phlceosinus dentatus, Say. Dendroctonus terebrans, Oliv. Hylastes cavernosus, Zimm. Hylurgops, pinifex, Fitch. ANTHRIBIDA. Allandrus bifasciatus, Lec. Hormiscus saltator, Lec. Authribus cornutus, Say. Cratoparis lunatus, Fabr. Famiuies, 67; Genera, 524; Species, 1,003. 86 SUCTORIA. J. B. Tyrreti, B.A., F.G.S., of THE GroLtocicaL AND NATURAL History SuRVEY OF CANADA. Read 14th February, 1884. It would be almost a truism to say that we are indebted to Lin- neus for first giving the fleas a systematic position in the animal _kingdom. He ranked them under the genus pulex, and placed this genus, along with many other dissimilar ones it is true, in the order aptera, an order under the class insecta. Lamarck also placed them under the same order, and it was left for Latreille in 1805 A.D. to separate them under the name suctoria, though he afterwards aban- doned it and adopted the name siphonaptera for these insects. In 1826 Kirby and Spence used the name aphan‘ptera for the same group, which is that ordinarily used in English books on entomology. In 1844 Gervais described all the species then known of the genus pulex, in a work by Walkeraer and Gervais on ‘“ Aptera,” a work which is still the principal book of reference on all the so-called apterous insects. In 1867 Landois gave us a careful description of the anatomy of the dog-flea (Pulex canis). and in 1880 O. Taschenberg in an exhaustive paper redescribed all the species that were then known, and after a careful examination of those found on a number of different animals considered that, with the exception of ten described species which he had not seen, all could be referred to 24 species grouped under five genera. The insect itself, as most of you are aware, is of a dark brown colour and from 7, to 4 in. in length, according to the species to which it belongs ; is strongly compressed laterally, and possessed ot powerful legs adapted for leaping. The head is relatively small, usually rounded on the upper side, and in most species more or less evenly curved from the neck to the point of insertion of the oral appencages. The hinder border of the head projects in two wing-like chitinous processes, which are inserted between the wings of the thorax, while at the same time the hinder border of the head overlaps the front of the thorax in its whole extent. This is noticeable, as it is very different from the arrangement 87 in the diptera, with which the fleas are usually allied. ‘The head is divided into two nearly equal parts by the antennary groove, in front of which are placed the eyes (when these are present) and the oral appendages. The eyes are simple, and normally appear as dark brown or black spots close to the antennary groove and towards the lower side of the head. On the side of the head are seen several chitinous hairs, which from their position and size in different species form useful specific characters. These are used in assisting the insect to obtain a strong hold on the skin of its host. The oral appendages are adapted for suction and consist of a pair of free plates and a tube made up of five separate pieces. The free plates are the maxillae, and are usually triangular in outline and of a dark chitinous colour. Each maxilla bears at its base a four-jointed palps, the joints of which are of different lengths in the different species, and are partly covered with fine hairs. These are the organs which were hy old observers taken for the antenne. The peculiar sucking tube is formed from the lower lip or labium, the mandibles and an impair piercing tube or lingua. The labium is impair at its base, then bifurcates, dividing into two four-jointed palps, each of which is hollowed out on the inner side. On the upper side this palp is thick, but it thins out and becomes mem- braneous on the lower side, being in shape somewhat like the blade of a hollow ground razor. 'Chese two half tubes lie together and enclose the mandibles and the lingua. The paired mandibles are long, narrow, longitudinally ribbed, and are also deeply excavated along the inner side, while the borers, except at the base, are strongly serrated, the teeth becoming more prominent towards the outer end. In the tube formed by the mandibles, which are generally pressed close together, lies the suctorial organ, or lingua, in the form ofa flattened needle, coarsely serrated on the upper border and traversed by a narrow canal, along which runs a very slender trachea or air-tube. At its hinder end it enlarges into a rounded sac before opening into the oesophagus. This organ is considered by some as representing the apper lip or labrum, but, on account of its mode of insertion rather 88 than from any developmental relations, we have considered it,’on the authority of many entomologists, as homologous to the lingua in other insects. "i After thus considering the oral sppendages at considerable length for so short a paper, as they are the parts which render the order most annoying, if not to ourselves at all events to our domestic favourites, we must hasten on to describe some of the other parts in the anatomy of these insects. | The antennz are hidden in the grooves which run obliquely back- wards and downwards across the head, and it is but seldom, and then only in a few species, that we see them carried erect. Behind the groove on each side a row of small hairs is usually present. The antenna itself is composed of three segments, the third being divided by a number of transverse membraneous joints by means of which it can be lengthened and shortened at the pleasure of the insect. On the back of this segment can be seen in some species a number of small sacs which are probably auditory. Towards its base it contracts con- siderably to the point where it articulates with the second segment. A row of strong bristles is often present around the anterior end of this latter, standing like guards around the terminal segment. The thorax is small and composed of three separate segments pro- tected by a chitinous covering, each composed of a dorsal piece or notum, and two lateral pieces or pleurae, which latter are largely developed at the expense of the sternum. The pleurae are more or less freely joined to the notum, the anterior ones being thrown forward almost under the head. On the posterior borders of the pleurae of the two hinder segments of the thorax small scales are present, which by some entomologists are considered as rudimentary wings, though by others this homology is denied. The pronotum on its hinder border is often provided with a collar of bristles which from their different size and number serve as good characters for distinguishing the species. The legs, which are attached to the pleurae of the three thoracic segments, are large, increasing in size from the first to the third pair, and adapted for leaping. The whole leg is, like the rest of the body, laterally compressed, and consists of five joints, viz., the very large coxa, the trochanter, the femur, the tibia, and the tarsus or foot, which 89 in its turn-is divided into five joints and ‘terminated by two strong claws. The relative length of these tarsal joints is usually used asa distinctive specific character. The abdomen constitutes the largest part of the body, and is made up of nine segments, the greater number of which are covered by dorsal and ventral chitinous plates, which overlap those of the segment in front. The first segment, however, has a dorsal plate only ; the second to the seventh are normally formed. The eighth segment has a somewhat peculiar shape, and differs in the two sexes. In the female the dorsal plate is largely developed at the expense of the ventral, the latter being very much reduced ; while in the male the ventral plate is about equal in size to the dorsal. The pygidium or ninth and last segment, which is the smallest of all, is situated in a depression in the eighth, and is composed of three pieces, a dorsal and two ventrals. The former is oval in shape and surrounded by a chitinous ring which encloses 25-28 areoles, each of which bears in its centre a small stiff bristle. In the male this segment is thrown very much farther up on the dorsal surface than in the female. Respiration is carried on through a system of trachez, which, open on the surface of the body in ten pairs of stigmata, two on each of the thoracic rings and the seven anterior segments of the abdomen. The alimentary canal is composed of a short~ straight oesophagus opening into a cylindrical stomach, from which the food passes by a short intestine to the anus, situate below the ninth abdominal segment. Two salivary glands open by a single duct into the oesophagus, and four glands, which probably serve the purpose of a liver, open into the lower end of the stomach. The eggs of the flea are small white oval bodies, which, when newly laid, on account of their viscous exterior, adhere to anything with which they may come in contact. The larva is footless and made up of thirteen nearly equal segments, the anterior of which, the head, is hard, chitinous, and bears the antenne and oral appendages, though eyes are absent. The oral appendages are composed of a pair of conical toothed mandibles, a pair of chitinous maxillae, with a two-jointed palp attached on each side, and an upper and lower lip. A small provisional organ, like that on the 90 bill of a chick, is also present, as a chitinous knob on the dorsal surface, for the purpose of breaking the shell of the egg. The second to the eleventh segments are each provided with a pair of lateral stigmata. The thirteenth segment is provided posteriorly with two strong spines, which are the principal organs of locomotion. The larva, after leading a very active life for a short time, spins a cocoon about it and passes into the pupa state. In this state of development the struc- ture of the body corresponds to that of the adult insect, all the organs of manducation and locomotion being present. After remaining in the pupa state for about thirty days the insect emerges as the perfect imago. Having taken more time than I had originally intended in describing the anatomy of these interesting parasites, a mere mention of afew of the more common and characteristic species must suftice. Pulex (Sarcopsylla ) penetrans.—the Chicoe or Jigger—is found in tropical countries. The female bores into the feet and ankles of men, and many of the domestic animals, and, the abdomen being distended as the ova undergo development, swells up to about the size of a pea, causing often very severe inflammation. Pulex irritans is the flea usually found in filthy dwellings, the larva being in the dust and dirt on and around the floors. It is distinguished from others ordinarily met with by having no colity of bristles around the neck. ; Pulex canis is found on dogs, cats., ete. It has a prominent collar around its neck and a row of bristles along the under side of the head. Pulex fasciatus is found on the rat, mouse, etc. It has a row of bristles around the neck, but none on the lower side of the head. Pulex ( Typhlopsylla ) assimilis is found on the mole, shrew, eéte., and has been found by Mr. J. F, Whiteaves, of this city, on the chip- munk, Zamias striatus. The body is long and thin, the eyes are rudi- mentary, and there is a row of eighteen bristles around the neck. 3) ON THE OCCURRENCE OF PHOSPHATES IN NATURE GrEorcE M. Dawson, D.S., F.G.S., Assoc. R.S.M., Erc., Assistant DirEcTOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA. Read 28th February, 1884. In proposing to review, in soshorta paper, as this must necessarily be, a subject so extensive as that indicated by the title, a difficult task has been undertaken, and I cannot hope to do more than touch upon its main points. In the first place it may be proper to enquire why phosphate materials are now so much sought for as fertilizers. It has been said laconically that ‘Phosphorus is life,” but this like most bold generalizations is but a partial, and’ even misleading statement of the fact. Certain it is, however, that this element, variously combined, is present in all living tissues, whether vegetable or animal, and though in small quantity only, is absolutely essential to these tissues, and, therefore, to the manifestation of life. | Animals, depending ultimately for their subsistence on plants, derive from these their supplies of phosphorus, together with the other substances necessary for their nutrition. Unlike the animal, the plant is capable of living, ultimately, on inorganic substances, and while deriving a large part of its food from the air, is absolutely dependent on the soil for those incombustible constituents which, when the plant is burnt, remain as ash. Without these the growth of the plant is impossible, and it is therefore necessary to ensure a sufficient supply of them in the soil. Phosphorus, in a state of combination, is one of these, and that to which I wish particularly to refer. In following this substance from the soil to the plant, from the plant to the animal, and from the ,animal again to the soil, we find a system of circulation, which, under certain conditions, might go on indefinitely. In a state of nature, this cycle is generally complete, but it is interfered with and broken by the present organization of humanity, and more particularly by those arrangements which have resulted in the massing of population in large towns. - In these it is found neces- sary to remove the effete and excrementitious matters by a system of 92 sewage, which results in draining the phosphates, and other substances: valuable from an agricultural point of view, into the sea, where they may be considered as absolutely lost. Victor Hugo, in a well known passage, contrasts the wealth to be seen rolling through the streets of Paris to that which is silently but steadily flowing away by the sewers beneath, which he maintains is greater. Be this as it may, in this particular case there is a continuous process on a large scale in action, by which the land is deprived of its phosphates, and particularly in a country like this, which exports great quantities of food material, with their contained phosphates, to be consumed abroad. Some years ago (1869) Mr. Gordon Brown calculated the amount of phosphorus actually contained in the grains annually shipped from the port cf Montreal, estimating it for this purpose in the form of phosphoric acid. Wheat contains about 58, (eight tenths) per cent. of phosphoric acid, or about 16 pounds to each ton, and as the total shipments of wheat amounted to 292,534 tons, the quantity of phosphoric acid sent away in it equalled 2,340 tons. Taking the average quantity of this substance contained in good soils, he found that this meant the total exhaustion to a depth of 12 inches— in so far as phosphates are concerned—of 70,320 acres, and would require the use of 5,850 tons of apatite of good quality as manure to maintain the fertility of the fields. Adding to this the amount of phosphoric acid contained in other grains exported he found the total loss in the year to be 2,574 tons of phosphoric acid, representing a value of over $500,000. With such statistics in evidence it will not be necessary to enlarge further on the necessity of discovering a source of supply of phosphates for our fiélds, and for this we must have recourse to some specially concentrated natural deposits. _ What therefore is the nature of these, how have they been formed, and where do they occur? In answering these questions, it must be remembered that soils have been produced by the decay and disintegration of rocks, and have derived their contained phosphates from the rocky crust of the earth. Good soils contain say about 52, (two-tenths) per cent. of phosphoric acid, and on analysing rocks chemically or microscopically we find phosphates— generally calcic phosphate—present in them in similar small proportions, 93 In some crystalline rocks we find apatite, or crystalline calcic phosphate so abundant that it can easily be recognized under the microscope. It is needless to say, however, that the percentage of phosphate present in ordinary rock masses is quite too small to suit them to be used as fertilizers for exhausted soils. We must have recourse to some richer sources of supply, and the concentration of phosphates in nature is generally found to have been brought about by organic agency. Of these concentrated deposits of phosphatic matter we may first glance at those known as Guanos. These are essentially composed of excrements of sea birds. Extensive accumulations of this character can occur only in dry climates, for though formed wherever sea birds congregate in great numbers, the rainfall is usually sufticient to remove them before they reach important dimensions. Guanos are naturally divided into two classes, though between the extremes of these there are many intermediate varieties. These classes have been named respectively nitrogenous and _ phosphatic Those of the first class occur in exceptionally dry climates, such as are found on the coast and adjacent islands of Peru, Bolivia and Chili, where rain seldom or never falls. In these the nitrogenous constituents of the organic matter—converted by decomposition into ammonia salts—remain as a part of the mass. In phosphate guanos, on the contrary, the rainfall has been sufficient to remove the whole or nearly the whole of the very soluble ammonia salts, while not enough to wash away the phosphatic material. Guanos of this class are of common occurrence in the West Indian islands, and in some of these in which the subjacent coral rock is penetrated by caverns, only such parts of the phosphatic accumulations are preserved as have been washed into these subterranean hollows through fissures, or have penetrated to them in solution through the porous coral rock. In the Ardennes region of the south of France, phosphatic deposits occur which, in my opinion, are very similar in origin to those just alluded to. These, however, are very much older and in fact include fossils of Tertiary age, and so far as known, none of modern forms.. They fill irregular cavernous fissures which traverse the surface of plateaus composed of Jurassic limestone, and it would appear that the higher parts of these plateaus have at one time formed an archipel- 94 ago of bird-frequented islands in a Tertiary Sea. The phosphate or phosphorite from these deposits is known commercially as Bordeaux phosphate—from its port of shipment—and though very irregular in its occurrence, is largely worked and exported. Phosphatic deposits like these, however, directly referable to surface accumulations by sea birds, are as a rule quite modern. With rare local exceptions any which may have been found in the earlier geological p2riods have been washed away and lost; the very process of submersion, necessary as a preliminary step to the preservation by burial in the strata, causing their dissipation. Most of the truly fossil phosphates found in connection with the older rocks have been formed in a quite different manner. To under- stand this we may examine first such modern deposits as the “Mussel Muds” of Prince Edward Island. These are accumulations produced in shallow tidal estuaries where great numbers of molluscs and other marine organisms are going to decay, so rich in phosphates and organic matter as to be of great value locally as a manure. Deposits more or less closely resembling these are found in many parts of the modern sea bottom and along the coast, and where just such deposits have been buried deeply, and included in some of the older formations, they produce what are known as “Coprolite beds.” This term, however, it must be explained, is in general very loosely applied. It should be restricted to the fossil excrements of various animals, which are occasionally found in the rocks, and often in such beds as those just referred to, but seldom even then constitute more than a small part of the phosphatic matter, most of which usually occurs as concretions or nodules. These have resulted from that slow process of drawing together of like particles in the mass, which is usually designated concretionary action, but is not in all cases fully understood. A frag- ment Of shell, or bone, or a tooth frequently serves as the nucleus of ‘such a concretion, and when the material is abundant such concretions frequently coalesce and form almost continuous layers. The so-called coprolite beds of Cambridgeshire, Bedfordshire and other localities in England, and those of Carolina, in the Southern States, are of this mature. The last named deposit dates no farther back than the Tertiary, 95 and consists of a layer, usually from six to fifteen inches in thickness charged with nodules of calcic phosphate and containing also bones, teeth and shells, the pores of which have been more or less completely filled with the same material. This deposit lies at no great depth below the surface, and is still nearly horizontal. In some places it is below high-water mark, and large quantities of the phosphatic nodules are obtained by dredging in some of the estuaries and channels which penetrate the low alluvial country. Where the nolule-bed occurs above the sea level it is worked by a system of trenching, the finer material being washed away on gratings, and the nodules then dried—generally by artificial heat—before being sent to the mill. A long way farther back in time are the ‘Coprolite” beds of the south of England, which date in fact from the Cretaceous period. Where this deposit occurs at an inconsiderable depth below the surface, it is worked by a system of trenching similar to that empioyed in Carolina, the soil being carefully put to one side and subsequently restored, and the land again brought under tillage. As the deposits are thin, it does not pay to follow them to any great depth, but some years ago the annual product was as much as 25,000 tons. These can be considered only as instances of the mode of occur- rence of phosphatic materials in the geological series. | Deposits more or less closely analogous to those described and sufficiently rich to work are found in a number of other localities, which we have not now time to consider, ‘There is reason to believe that phosphatic or “coprolitic’’ nodular deposits have been found wherever the local conditions were favourable and large quantities of animal matter were in process of accumulation and decay, throughout the entire geological series. Going a great way back in geological history, we find instances of this in Canada in parts of the Chazy subdivision of the Silurian, in the graptolitic shales ot the Quebec group, and even in the Cambrian rocks of St. John. It is true that none of these deposits are of importance from an economic point of view; for instances of workable deposits in these paleozoic rocks we must turn elsewhere. They are merely mentioned here for the purpose of connecting the occurrence of naturally concen- trated phosphatic materials as found in the newer rocks, with the deposits of the same material found in the oldest known rocks—those of the Laurentian period. 96 In the Laurentian rocks—which are those characterizing the great -country to the north of the Ottawa, and elsewhere very largely developed in Canada—we have a great volume ot sediments, deposited in an ocean of vast antiquity, the earliest in fact of which we find any traces: - These sediments which, no doubt, originaily resembled in their main features those of later ages, have since been so completely metamorphosed that their materials have entered into new combinations among them- selves and become entirely crystalline. While, therefore, still consisting of the materials originally deposited, they resemble them as little in appearance as do the crude ingredients of glass the finished product. There can, however, be no doubt of the original sedimentary origin of these Laurentian rocks, the change from muds and sands—and I would _ also include contemporaneous volcanic materials—to wholly crystalline rocks such as these, is seen in less metamorphosed formations in various parts of the earth’s crust, and has been traced in all its stages. If, therefore, ordinary limestones were originally present in these old rocks, -we would expect them now to have assumed a wholly crystalline character, and to appear as marbles. Contained beds of a peaty or coaly nature might be expected to pass into crystalline carbon or graphite, and pbosphatic nodular or coprolitic layers could appear only as crystalline calcic phosphate or apatite. As a matter of fact we find all three of these substances in the Lanrentian, and though the proof may not be absolute that their origin and appearance -was at first the same as that of analogous materials in the newer rocks, the evidence is all in that direction. The main facts in regard to the mode of occurrence of these deposits of apatite in Canada, so far as cur knowledge goes, must be very briefly presented. Some of the beds in the Laurentian series are found to be comparatively rich in apatite, crystals and crystalline masses of this mineral being scattered through them. This is the case in some of the marbles, occasionally in the iron ores, and also particularly in connection’ with the pyroxenic rocks. In addition to these, in which the apatite may be considered as generally distributed, certain layers, apparently of the character of beds, occur, consisting of nearly pure apatite, or containing so large a proportion of the mineral as to pay for working. Still further, we find distinct veins and fissures which have Bi been filled with apatite by processes of segregationin which the mineral is found either nearly pure, or, more frequently, mingled with crystals of other substances. Though the exportation of these Canadian deposits may, [ believe, be considered as still in its infancy, it has already assumed considerable proportions. Quoting from an interesting paper read a few days ago by Dr. Sterry Hunt, before the American Institute of Mining Engineers, we find that the amount shipped from Montreal, in 1883, was 17,840 tons, of which a portion was delivered in Hamburg and Steckholm, but the greater part went to British ports. Of this amount 15,000 tons were from Quebec, the remainder from Ontario. It is estimated, according to Dr. Hunt, that the shipments during the present year will amount to 24,000 tons. Besides the very wide spread of these apatite deposits and their great economic importance, one of the most striking facts so far developed is their great irregularity. Taking into consideration the extremely disturbed character of the Laurentian rocks, this is easily understood. Layers and veins which may, before the great folding and kneading together of these rocks, have possessed considerable regularity and uniformity, have been, as a consequence of the excessive distur- bance, folded and dislocated in every sense, leading to the production of large pockets and irregular masses of apatite which may now be connected only by narrow and twisted seams, or may occupy what appear to be completely isolated positions. This being the case, it may be asked : can a Geological Survey do’ anything to aid in the discovery of apatite and the development of this mining industry? Fortunately we are not quite without a clue in the matter. It has already been discovered (largely by Mr. Vennor’s work) that certain broad zones of the Laurentian series, (in part already traced out and mapped,) contain most of the workable deposits of apatite, while extensive intervening belts of country show comparatively little apatite and offer little encouragement to the miner. These zones are pretty clearly recognizable by their composition and character, and though much has already been done in the matter of defining them, much more yet remains to do. They can, it would appear, be mapped down with a degree of certainty nearly as great as regions capable of 98 yielding good lumber, or lands suitable for farming can be defined by explorations with these particular ends in view. The further question involved in the utilization and working of special local deposits is also- one requiring sagacity and special knowledge, but cannot be considered as within the province of a public survey. Like the enquiry as to how given tree will afford, or how best to lay out a certain plot of a couple of hundred acres for farming purposes, many feet of sawn lumber a this remains to be determined by the person who wishes to utilize these for his own pecuniary benefit. Mr. J. Fraser Torrance being called upon, at the suggestion of the lecturer, explained that the heaviest deposits of phosphate in the County of Ottawa lie along the valley of the Cievres. As you move either eastwards or westwards from tkis river, the deposits usually become more and more intermixed with calcite, until they finally cease to be profitably workable. The methods of mining employed ave of the rudest and most elementary kind. The only hoisting and pumping machinery employed (with very rare exceptions) is a tub on the end of a rope swung over the pit by a derrick worked with one horse. The pits are almost all quite as wide at the mouth as below and are well calcu- lated to collect all the surface water, snow, etc. The managers have evidently adopted the maxim of Louis XV: “ After me the deluge.” Deeper sinking will be attended with great difficulty on account of the quantity of water collected in these shallow pits. Almost all of the pits visited by him were neither veins nor beds, but irregular segregations from the surrounding rock. In. most cases it was hard to tell where to draw the line between the ore and the waste rock. One reason why so little apatite was converted into superphosphate in Canada hé believed to be the reckless manner in which the materials were mixed and branded in former days by the company at Brockville. The farmers had no guarantee that any two barrels of the same brand would be of even approximately equal value for their lands. He hoped these errors had all been corrected since his visit to Brockville years ago. The Ontario Agricultural College at Guelph is doing good service in convincing farmers of the practical value of such fertilizers. 99 Although we exported 19,000 tons of apatite last year, almost every ton of it was shipped to Great Britain and Europe. The quantity sent to the United States was trifling. This was the more remarkable as a large amount of American capital is invested in our Canadian apatite deposits. From the statistics supplied to him by Mr. Nimmo at Washington, it appeared that in the year ending 30th June, 1883, the United States imported 49,381 tons of crude phosphate, valued at $429,391; 39,119 tons of Kainit, valued at $246,231, and 7,666 tons of superphosphate, valued at $120,576. Of this quantity, 1,262 tons of crude phosphate and all the superphosphate came from Britain. It. thus seems reasonable to infer that some of our Canadian apatite was merely reshipped to the United States from Great Britain without any fresh treatment there, while a much larger quantity was first converted into superphosphate there and shipped in that form to the United States. ; The only explanation of this anomaly seemed to be that it was a fresh proof of the conservative nature of trade. ‘The American dealers were in the habit of importing from Britain long before our Canadian deposits of apatite were opened. When these were first opened it was done by men more familiar with the English market than the American. It was less “ bother” to ship from Montreal to the Mersey or to Bristol, than to load barges there for New York. After the trade was once established no determined effurt seems to have been. made to direct it into fresh channels. | It was worth while to notice also in this connection that, although plumbago to the value of $361,949 was imported into the United States: last year, not ore pound of it came from Canada. The lack of skill or reckless folly of our miners in shipping inferior stuff to gain a temporary profit has given Canadian plumbago a bal name that it may be almost impossible to overcome. Mr. Hoffmann’s admirable report showed that it was really quite as good as that from Ceylon. Mr. F. D. Apams stated that in the Transactions of the Geological Society of Stockholm for April, 1883, H. Sjogren had given a very interesting account of the apatite deposits at Oedegarden in Bamle, Norway. At this one locality alone, in 1882, between 700 and 800 men were employed in mining the apatite, and about 15,000 tons were: g : 100 raised. The rocks of the district are quartzites overlain by mica-schists, hornblende schists, gabhos and dipyr-diorites, which pass into one another. The apatite veins occur only in the gabho and dipyr-diorite, or in the immediate vicinity of these rocks, which, although contem- poraneous with the other schists, are considered to have probably had an eruptive origin. He believed the apatite to have been derived from the gabho and dipyr-diorite, and deposited by water in clefts caused by the contraction of the rock on“cooling. The apatite- deposits of Norway and Canada being so like one another in many respects, it might be supposed that when such a constant relation between the apatite and gabho was found to exist in the former country, a similar relation would obtain in the latter, but this was apparently not the case. The dipyr-diorite had, however, lately been recognized by him among a collection of rock fragments, from the vicinity of Arnprior, sent to the Survey for examination, and a description of it would shortly be published. 101 THE DEER OF THE OTTAWA VALLEY. ENWeden J boyd, Read 13th M arch, 1884. The moose (Alce Americanus, Jardine, considered by many naturalists to be identical with Alce malchis, Linnzeus, of the old world) or American elk, is the largest of all deer now existing in the world, although much inferior in size to the ancient Irish elk, which must have been an animal of gigantic proportions, if we are to judge by the size and weight of the ponderous antlers occasionally found in the bogs of Ireland many feet beneath the surface. Some specimens of these great horns have been exhumed, with a spread of twelve feet, which will give some idea of the magnitude of the animal which carried them. The American moose, according to the conclusions of all scientific naturalists, is a true elk, identical with the ancient Irish elk, the Scandinavian and the Asiatic elk. A moose of the largest size, when fat, will weigh upwards of fifteen hundred pounds.