Historic, archived document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. ref haar Aer] syd hites tet AT fe Se USSG Aly AAC Tr neat fiz yA Heth asta hs on - vine nitty ie it et RrR ees 22 ser if ere Belial a iit ga ian as speicgs titat hen Roath citar Reefer host wi eterets oe ase by “ye npn ee cise: 71 . yd nt ro ts ule mle A Aly - Tw * ince Lhe Sede ahaa VW day Ve 8 OOD. eoptioe yey ve eats - Aatetotire ve -— perme ror) ve 4 wt ad be! te Lteretes Bee e WE ry wee YUE =e pms an ves +s eee ee ree a ytd Secplites cere dora! era) Hrd Bh ba mer di Ci La Cat beeen ¥ Sa bstars a A hp etewe EA Rha rey vepeee pe Feat be bac oe 3 M yn wade SM wy dt ad tn ds ih ead piney " herpes eget “4 Aleve lrevtatog soe - LUMA U se 4 wn yE eey y ses cant Diba A. andi Whe decks if 9k Ril ih do z - Lohan were renee 9 aeerera % Ae dnd Md 08 tpt de er Be i ti a tb 98 dod J Feat Se ho Coe Fi Tite ada Metts ek ve 08 PENG Rye Y yOey | om eet bedi hth bean tyes ee we edat Nh At dA Shh De I Pee 9 ew ew gers CE ee Ger «weg vty we oreene a tdi iehtha Te Ltt ls =a poy wie iy ieee vee ww cay a shen ie Bn aaa wig eelay wre es Vey ee 9 Sie FOO W vere YY ery eee eer ey PA teat TA Bidet te thle te Fou ye ay ey we Bd ow ye ew ve # py Bre Ose Lae Tene 6 eee Ree SS Heron "g 8 erent National Agricultural Library y S y és %, Qe : %, eae A cy pe LE ys < eA o, ® ~. *, we GRATE > (ais esa Au ye %e, A VON > ¢ ET fas *%, ge LON Ae ee CI w#H hel ons Base ae ae a A iy oe den" a , age! sat & t @ 4 ar a é | ee pel: Ce ) = ff mp Ss 7 es pS eit Hyjbh< é rs a , paper ‘ Dt + “fea. Pi 7 4 - 4 oe ot 7 » « — . , : ' we ian hae a m = “mm. United States << Department of =; Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station Research Note PNW-425 June 1985 Abstract Introduction Tree Basal Area as an Index of Thermal Cover for Elk J. Edward Dealy LIBRARY U.S. FOREST SERVICE BERKELEY Po is Se PSW FOREST AND RANGE EXPERIMENT STATION AUG 7 1985 STATION LIBRARY COPY , The relationship of basal area to crown closure was studied in five major forest types of the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. The regressions developed give wildlife and forest managers a tool for estimating the amount of crown closure if data are not available from stand examinations. Information is used in determining quantity and quality of elk thermal cover. Keywords: Basal area, crown closure, thermal cover, wildlife habitat, Cervidae. Thermal cover for elk is a habitat feature, such as a stand of conifer trees, that provides protection against changes in an animal’s body temperature above and below critical tolerances (thermoregulation). Generally, as crown closure increases, the effectiveness of a stand to provide thermal cover improves. Optimum thermal cover is determined by the animal as well as by the habitat. Changes in season, temperature, wind, and radiation create different thermoregulation demands on the animal. Crown closures that provide optimum thermal cover under one set of weather conditions may not be optimum under others. Variability among and within conifer stands often provides a wide range of crown closure and thermal cover characteristics that correspond to animals’ changing needs. For summer ranges in the Blue Mountains region of Oregon and Washington, the optimum level of elk thermal cover for management purposes is defined as a stand of coniferous trees at least 12 m (40 ft) tall and exceeding an average of 70 per- cent crown closure (Thomas and others 1979). Use varies with the animals’ needs and the amount of cover; for example, during summer high temperature periods, elk need clumps of trees that provide dense shade (often 90 to 100 percent crown closure and multitiered crowns) for maximum cooling (Leckenby and Adams 1981), whereas on a winter range the best available thermal cover may be less than op- timum for protection. A better understanding of optimum thermal cover under a variety of weather, site, and seasonal conditions will help managers to appropriately manipulate forest stands to provide this component of elk habitat. ~~ $ TATION LIBRARY COPY J. EDWARD DEALY is principal research ecologist at the Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experi- ment Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, PO. Box 909, Juneau, Alaska 99802. Methods Results and Discussion The objective of this study was to determine if crown closure of conifers in un- managed natural stands in the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington could be predicted from tree basal area measurements. If so, stand basal area, which is usually available, could be used to estimate crown closure and in turn to help managers manipulate stands to achieve optimum thermal cover. Plots were located in six geographical areas of the Blue Mountains region of Oregon and Washington: (1) the north portion of the Umatilla National Forest (Walla Walla District); (2) the north portion of the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest (Wallowa Valley District and Hells Canyon National Recreation Area); (3) the southeastern portion of the Umatilla National Forest (Ukiah and Dale Districts plus part of the Baker District of the Wallowa-Whitman National Forest); (4) the 4 southwest portion of the Umatilla National Forest (Heppner District); (5) the Malheur — National Forest (Prairie City and John Day Districts); and (6) the Ochoco National Forest (Paulina District). Plots were established by Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife research scientists at specific locations used by elk during all seasons (Leckenby and | Adams 1981); 609 plots were stratified into five Society of American Foresters cover — types (Eyre 1980) and were identified by symbols (Hall 1976) (referred to as “formation-associations ’): Cover type (SAF) No. Symbol (Hall 1976) Interior Ponderosa Pine 237 CP Interior Douglas-Fir 210 CD Grand Fir 213 CW Lodgepole Pine 218 CL Engelmann Spruce- Subalpine Fir 206 CE All plots sampled were in unmanaged stands (there was no evidence of tree removal). A single sample of basal area, using a basal area factor of 10 (Dilworth and Bell 1967) was taken at each plot with a prism. Four readings of crown closure ~ were taken at cardinal directions and 15 feet from the plot center with a type A densiometer (Lemmon 1956) and were averaged. For each cover type, crown closure and basal area (BA) were related by use of regression analysis. An empirical fit of the data was made by using the models of Y as a function of Logio (X + 1), and Y as a function of various powers of x (x1, x2, and x3). From this analysis the equation model percent crown cover = a + b[LOG;> (BA+1)] was found to be the best fit. For 70 percent crown closure in CP, CD, CW, SL, and CE formation-associations, the corresponding basal area values are 190, 80, 64, 145, and 70 square feet per acre, respectively (figs. 1-5). The percentage of variation in crown closure ' associated with basal area (r2) ranged from 0.21 for CE to 0.49 for CW (table 1). : These regressions are best used in cases where crown closure data are not 3 available. It should be noted that, whatever the basal area, when 70 percent crown ; closure is approached on most curves (figs. 2-4), reliability is relatively high (con- : fidence limits are narrow). F tests for all the regressions presented for formation- associations were significant (p < 0.01). These regressions apply only to unthinned stands. Use of these regressions to judge the level of thermal cover that will remain after a stand is thinned is not ap- propriate. Crown characteristics of remnant trees after cutting in a dense stand are different from crown characteristics of an open stand that developed naturally to the same level of closure. Use of the crown closure-basal area relationships described here would overestimate crown closure—sometimes dramatically. 100 Number of plots 89 Formula Percent crown closure = -28 50 + 43.20 [LOG « (BA+1)]) r 45 & 3 i) Crown closure (percent) Le) (=) 0 10 20 50 100 200 Basal area (square feet) Figure 1—Regression curve showing crown closure as a function of basal area for the Ponderosa Pine (CP) formation-association. Number of plots) 110 Formula: Percent crown closure = -1.27 + 37.33 [LOG (BA+1)]} i 32 80 ~~ apse 8 i“ ® & 60 o 70 percent crown closure for 5 optimum thermal cover for elk ” oO B 40 iS s i“ oO 20 i) 10 20 50 100 200 250 Basal area (square feet) Figure 2.—Regression curve showing crown closure as a function of basal area for the Douglas-Fir (CD) formation-association. 100 Number of plots: 318 Formula: Percent crown closure = -5.55 + 41.59 [LOG 1. (BA+1)] re 49 80 ~~ = = o o a 2 60 70 percent crown closure for 5 optimum thermal cover for elk te =) n & © 40 = F3 = O 20 0 10 20 50 100 200 250 Basal area (square feet) Figure 3.—Regression curve showing crown closure as a function of basal area for the White Fir (CW) formation- association. 100 Number of plots: 55 Formula: Percent crown closure = -20.29 + 41.80 (LOG 1. (BA+1)] rm 41 80 = ¢ @ © o & 60 @ i= =} a) & oO 40 70 percent crown closure for § optimum thermal cover for elk (2) & oO 20 (0) 10 20 50 100 200 250 Basal area (square feet) Figure 4.—Regression curve showing crown closure as a function of basal area for the Lodgepole Pine (CL) formation-association. Number of plots: 37 Formula: Percent crown closure = -5.01 + 40.46 [LOG 1» (BA+1)] m2) 80 - — — ° a 2 60 70 percent crown closure for -— F o optimum thermal cover for elk = =] n AJ © 40 ‘= = ° = O 20 0 10 20 50 100 200 250 Basal area (square feet) Figure 5.—Regression curve showing crown closure as a function of basal area for the Engelmann Spruce- Subalpine Fir (CE) formation-association. Table 1—Values by formation-association for regression coefficients a and b in the formula percent crown cover = a + b[LOG;0(BA+1)], plus information for evaluating reliability of the crown closure-basal area correlations! ee Sampled basal area Significance of Number Fille ia ee Formation- of association plots Maximum Minimum a b F r2 eee CP 89 220 10 —28.50 43.20 0.01 0.45 CD 110 280 10 = 1027. Sio3 01 acy CW 318 320 10 — 5.55 41.59 .01 .49 GL 55 270 10 —20.29 41.80 .01 .41 CE 37 270 20 = 5.01 40.46 .01 “2 ee ee SS 1/ Symbols are from Hall (1976), cover types from Eyre (1980): “C” designates a stand of conifers; P, Ponderosa Pine; D, Douglas-Fir; W, White (or Grand) fir; L, Lodgepole Pine; and E, Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir; r?, coefficient of determination. Literature Cited Dilworth, J.R.; Bell, J.F. Variable plot cruising. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State Unive sity Book Stores, Inc.; 1967. 117 p. Eyre, F.H., ed. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, © DC: Society of American Foresters; 1980. 148 p. + map. Hall, Frederick C. Pacific Northwest ecoclass identification: concept and codes. R-6 Regional Guide 1-3. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station; 1976. 44 p. Leckenby, Donavin A.; Adams, A.W. “Bud.” Eastern Oregon cover study interim — report. Inf. Rep. Ser. Wildl. 81-1. La Grande, OR: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Research and Development Section; 1981. 68 p. Lemmon, Paul E. A spherical densiometer for estimating forage overstory density. Forest Science. 2: 314-320; 1956. Thomas, Jack Ward; Black, Hugh, Jr.; Scherzinger, Richard J.; Pedersen, Richard J. Deer and elk. In: Thomas, Jack Ward, ed. Wildlife habitats in managed forests: the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. Agric. Handb. 553. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; 1979: 104-127. The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the National Forests and National Grasslands, it strives — as directed by Congress — to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Applicants for all Department programs will be given equal consideration without regard to age, race, color, sex, religion, or national Origin. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station 319 S.W. Pine St. PO. Box 3890 Portland, Oregon 97208